SRI T.KURMA RAO S/O RAMULU OBTAINED “KONDA KAPU” ST CASTE

CERTIFICATE - CASE REFERRED TO THE DISTRICT LEVEL SCRUTINY

COMMITTEE - DLSC ENQUIRED AND SUBMITTED IT’S FINDINGS THAT THE

INDIVIDUAL DOES NOT BELONG TO “KONDA KAPU” CASTE.

COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE,

VISAKHAPATNAM.

[1]

CANCELLATION OF FALSE CASTE CERTIFICATE

Read :

1.

Letter DT:08.01.1988 of the Chief Pers. & Admn Manager, Hindustan

Petroleum Corporation Limited, Visakhapatnam.

2.

This office letter RC.N0.11868/1987/TW DT: 12.09.1989

3.

This office (M) RC.N0.11868/1987/C5 DT:20.07.2007

4.

RC.N0.6672/2007/RCRI DT:04.02.2013 of the Revenue Divisional Officer,

Visakhapatnam.

5.

This office Notice (M) RC.N0.1806/2012/C5 DT:09.12.2013

6.

RC.NO.71/2014/C DT:04.07.2014 of the Tahsildar, Paderu

7.

RC.NO.511/2015/C DT:30.01.2016 of the Tahsildar, Visakhapatnam

Urban

Registered No. HSE-49/2016

W.No.26

AMARAVATI, TUESDAY , JULY 3, 2018

G.214

PART II - MISCELLANEOUS NOTIFICATIOSN OF INTEREST TO THE PUBLIC

--x--

NOTIFICATIONS BY HEADS OF DEPARTMENTS Etc.,

2

ANDHRA PRADESH GAZETTE, July 3, 2018

8.

This office Notice (M) RC.N0.1806/2012/C5 DT: 14.06.2016

9.

Letter DT:08.07.2016 of the Deputy General Manager, Hindustan

Petroleum Corporation Limited, Visakhapatnam

10. Findings DT:23.12.2016 of the DLSC Committee, Visakhapatnam

11. Explanation DT: 13.03.2017 of Sri Thomurothu Kurma Rao S/o Ramulu

resident of D.No.14-50/13, T4, Plot No.17, Vijaya Sai Enclave, Near

Simhachalam Depot, Visakhapatnam

ORDER :

(M) D.DIS.NO.1806/2012/C5,- The Manager (Personal), Visakha Refinery,

Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Visakhapatnam requested the District Authority

to verify the genuineness of the caste of their employee of Sri.Thomorothu Kurma Rao

s/o late Ramulu who is claiming ST-Konda Kapu. As per the organization request initially

the matter has been referred to the MRO, Visakhaptnam who submitted his report

stating that Sri Thomurothu Kurma Rao does not belongs to Konda Kapu caste but

he belongs to Plain Kapu and further requested to refer the case to the Sub Collector,

Paderu. Accordingly, the same was referred to the Sub Collector, Paderu, who in turn

after conducting enquiry has reported that there is no family with the surname of

“Thomurothu” has been resided in Paderu Division and hence it is a false caste

certificate. As such, the then District Collector, Viskahaptnam requested the HPCL

authorities to take action against the said employee. Accordingly, HPCL has initiated

action against the individual by issuing Charge Sheet and conducted domestic enquiry

in the matter and found guilty of the charges leveled against him.

Aggrieved by the disciplinary action of HPCL, Sri Thomurothu Kurma Rao

has filed a Writ Petition No.7225/1999 against l).the District Collector, Visakhapatnam,

2).the Visakha Refinery, rep by its GM, HPCL, Visakhapatnam and 3).the Chief Material

Manager, Visakha Refinery, HPCL, Visakhapatnam with a prayer that, the order or

direction of the District Collector, Visakhapatnam vide RC.N0.11868/87/TW

DT: 12.09.1989 as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and the same may be set

aside and further to direct, the 2nd respondent company to drop all further proceedings

against the petitioner in pursuance of the District Collector order in RC.N0.11868/87/

TW DT: 12.09.1989. The WP No.72725/1999 has been disposed vide order

dt.22-8-2006. The operative part of the said order (para 5 & 6 ) are as follows:

* * *

ANDHRA PRADESH GAZETTE, July 3, 2018

3

“Para 5: it is obvious that the District Collector, who is the competent authority

at the relevant point of time to cancel the caste certificate, did not cancel the

caste certificate of the petitioner as such.

Para 6: Therefore, though there are reasons to find the Caste certificate to

be defective or fake by the competent authority; until the same culminate

into an actual order of cancellation by the competent authority, i.e., the District

Collector, subject to the further enquiry, as per the procedure prescribed under

G.O.Ms.No.282, dated.19.12.1980, no further orders can be passed in the

present Writ Petition. However, if any further proceedings are to be initiated,

the procedure prescribed under the Regulation of SC Act 16 of 1980, which

came into force since 16th May 1997, has to be followed. Since no procedure

either under G.O.Ms.No.282, dated 19.12.1988, or under the S.C. Act 16 of

1980 Act has been followed, no further orders need be passed in this writ

petition.”

Pursuant to the orders of the Hon’ble High Court in WP 7225/1995

dt.22-8-2006, the Chief Manger- HR, HPCL, Visakhapatnam requested the District

Collector to cause enquiry and to issue orders. As such, the then Collector,

Visakhapatnam has referred the said matter to the Revenue Divisional Officer,

Visakhapatnam and requested to enquire on caste and social status of Sri Thomurothu

Kurma Rao. Accordingly, the Revenue Divisional Officer, Visakhapatnam has submitted

his report vide reference 4th read above. The report of the Revenue Divisional Officer,

Visakhapatnam reveals that,

A. Sri Thomurothu Kurma Rao has attended for enquiry on 16.09.2012 and

deposed that his forefathers are native of Saripalli village of Paderu Mandal

and migrated to Vizianagaram for their livelihood and settled in Vizianagaram.

He further stated that, he was joined in HPCL during the year 1979 as Head

Man and presently working there only. During the course of enquiry he has

given his family tree as detailed below.

4

ANDHRA PRADESH GAZETTE, July 3, 2018

B. During the enquiry the following Xerox documents were submitted by Sri

Thomurothu Kurma Rao in support his claim.

1. Caste Certificate issued by the then Tahsildar, Visakhapatnam

D.Dis.No.2205/81/A4 Dt.15.07.1981.

2. Caste certificate issued by the then Tahsildar, Visakhpatnam vide Rc.No.2020/

78 Dt.28.06.1978.

3. TC issued by the Head Master, Mrs.A.V.N. High School, Visakhapatnam.

4. Record sheet issued by the HM, Sri Rama Upper Primary School, Municipal

Corporation, Chengalaraopeta, Visakhapatnam.

C. During the enquiry, the Revenue Divisional Officer, Visakhapatnam has

noticed that, the family members of Sri T.Kurma Rao are not belong to

ANDHRA PRADESH GAZETTE, July 3, 2018

5

ST-Kondakapu and they belongs to OC and moreover the wife of Sri T.Kurma

Rao and his children are also not claimed the Caste of ST and all are belong

to OC community and living under the social status of OC (Kapu).

D. Sri T.Kurma Rao has not produced any documentary evidence to show that,

he belongs to ST-Konda Kapu community except the old certificate issued

earlier by the then Tahsildar and T.C. Therefore it shows that Sri T.Kurma

Rao himself obtained the Job in the category of ST quota fraudulently and

enjoying the benefits.

E. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Visakhapatnam finally opined that, it is a fit

case to place the matter before the DLSC as per the norms specified under

G.O.Ms.No.58/SW (J) Dept., Dt.12.05.1997 to take further suitable action.

On considering the report of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Visakhapatnam

and according to the Section 5 (1) of the Andhra Pradesh (Scheduled Caste, Scheduled

Tribes & Backward Class Regulation of Issue of Community Certificate Act, 16 of

1993 read with Rule 9 of the AP (SC, ST & BCs) Regulation of Issue of Community

Certificate Act, 1997, the Caste Status claim of Sri Thomurothu Kurma Rao S/o Ramulu

has been referred to the District Level Scrutiny Committee under the Chairmanship of

the Joint Collector, Visakhapatnam for scrutiny and enquiry and to submit it’s findings/

recommendations.

In pursuance to the above instructions of the District Collector, Visakhapatnam,

the Joint Collector & Chairman, DLSC Committee has issued notice in form-VI to the

individual vide reference 5th read above with a request to attend for hearing on

21.12.2013 before the committee and to furnish the documentary evidence in support

of his community claim. On 21.12.2013, Sri Thomurothu Kurma Rao S/o Ramulu has

appeared before the committee and stated that, his parents belong to ST Community

and his forefathers are native of Saripalli Village of Paderu Mandal. But, he did not

shown any documentary evidence to prove his caste. During the course of enquiry, the

DLSC has obtained the reports on caste status from the Tahsildar, Paderu and

Tahsildar, Visakhaptnam Urban.

The Tahsildar, Paderu has reported vide reference 6th read above that, the

fore fathers of Sri Thomurothu Kurma Rao S/o Ramulu were once resided in Saripalli

Village of Paderu Mandal and subsequently they migrated from the Village and the

villagers of Sariapalli village have stated that, they were not aware of the caste status

of Sri Thomurothu Kurma Rao S/o Ramulu and place of migration of his forefathers.

6

ANDHRA PRADESH GAZETTE, July 3, 2018

The Tahsildar, Visakhapatnam Urban has reported vide reference 7th read

above that,

1. Sri Thomurothu Kurma Rao S/o Ramulu, is a resident of D.No: 14-50, Vijaya

Sai Enclave, Simhachalam Depot, Gopalapatnam Visakhapatnam.

2. His parents native place is Edurupalli Village of Paderu Mandal. His father

was a blacksmith worker. His mother was a house wife.

3. They have migrated from Paderu to Vizianagaram and further to

Visakhapatnam for eking of their livelihood. Since his parents migrated at 2

years of his age from Paderu to Visakhapatnam city and settled in the city,

the individual does not know about the customs & habits of Kondakapu

community.

4. The individual admitted in a statement that he never visited his native place

(Paderu) during his lifetime. He has completed his primary & secondary

education in Visakhapatnam. In the school records his caste was registered

as ST-Kondakapu. Based on the school records & Transfer Certificates (TC),

the individual might have been obtained ST-Kondakapu caste certificate from

Taluk office Visakhapatnam vide RC.NO.2020/78, DT:28.06.1978.

5. Based on the said certificate, the individual has again obtained ST-Kondakapu

caste certificate vide D.DIS.NO:2205/81/A4, DT: 15.07.1981. Based on these

two certificates, the individual might have obtained employment in HPCL

under ST reservation.

6. Sri Thomurothu Kurma Rao is married to Smt.Bhavani who belongs to Kapu

community and she is a house wife. They are blessed with two children namely

T.Vinod Kumar and T.Venkata Tulasi lakshmi. He never utilized ST reservation

to his children education. Further. Sri Thomurothu Kurma Rao S/o Ramulu

has also given written statement stating that he does not know about the

customs & habits of Kondakapu community. His family members i.e., two

brothers also married with OC Kapu community women. His daughter married

with OC Kapu community person.

7. The relevant old records (office files) pertaining to the certificates said to be

issued from Tahsildar, Visakhaptnam are not traced in the record room of

Tahsildar’s Office, Visakhapatnam despite diligent search. The Tahsildar,

Visakhapatnam finally opinioned that, his caste status may be considered

as Non ST community.

ANDHRA PRADESH GAZETTE, July 3, 2018

7

In pursuance to the reports of the Tahsildar, Paderu and Visakhapatnam Urban,

the DLSC Committee has again called for hearing on 18.06.2016 for conduct of enquiry

on the subject matter. The individual has appeared before the committee. While asking

about the original caste certificate of the individual, Sri Thomurothu Kurma Rao

S/o Ramulu has stated that, the original certificate have been submitted to the HPCL

authorities at the time of appointment. As such, a letter has been addressed to HPCL

authorities for production / supply the original caste certificate of the individual.

In response to the request of the Joint Collector & Chairman, DLSC,

Visakhapatnam, the Deputy General Manager, HPCL, Visakha Refinery,

Visakhapatnam has stated that, the statement of Sri Thomurothu Kurma Rao S/o

Ramulu that he has submitted the original certificates to HPCL authorities at the time

of appointment is “False”, as they do not have any practice of obtaining the original

certificates from their employees and retaining them for any period or reason.

The following are the copies of documents submitted by the individual

Sri.K.Kurma Rao in support of his caste claim.

On perusal the reports of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Visakhapatnam,

Tahsildar, Visakhapatnam Urban & Paderu, the Deputy General Manager, HPCL,

Visakha Refinery, Visakhapatnam and as per the documentary evidence submitted by

the Sri Thomurothu Kurma Rao S/o Ramulu at the time of hearings, the DLSC

Committee has submitted the it’s findings as follows

1. On perusing, the above documents , it is observed that, the Caste mentioned

in the School certificates was based on the declaration submitted by his

Parents/Guardian. The caste certificates produced by the individual are

copies of the caste certificates. There are no original caste certificates

submitted by the individual. Hence, those documents cannot be taken into

consideration.

2. As per the statement given by the individual and report submitted by the

Revenue Divisional Officer, it is noticed that, no family member in the entire

family of Sri T.Kurma Rao has married Konda Kapu caste people. All family

members had matrimonial relations with plain Kapu people only. Sri

Thomurothu Kurma Rao wife also belongs to Kapu community only. Even the

daughter of Sri.T.Kurmarao has also married to a Kapu community person.

The marriage relations of himself and his family members, clearly prove that,

he is not following any tribal customs.

3. During enquiry by the DLSC, he did not submit any proof (or) Document that

he belongs to Konda Kapu Community.

4. Nor he produced any of his family members caste certificates that they belong

Konda Kapu community.

5. Nor he brought any of his relatives caste certificates for the DLSC enquiry

that they belong to Konda Kapu community.

6. No documentary evidence produced by him during the complete enquiry.

In view of the above, the DLSC opined that,

“the certificates produced by the individual had no validity and are not

reliable. The family tree itself speaks that, the entire family members

undergone matrimonial relations with plain Kapu people only. And there is

no documentary evidence to show that he belongs to Konda Kapu. Hence

recommended for cancellation of ST Konda Kapu certificate issued to Sri

T.Kurma Rao in 1978 and 1981 by the Tahsildar, Visakhapatnam Urban

and 1976 certificate by members of Legislative council.”

Based on the above findings / recommendations of the District Level Scrutiny

Committee, Visakhapatnam and according to the Section 5 (1) of the Andhra Pradesh

(SC, ST & BCs) Regulation of Issue of Community Certificate Act, 1993, a show cause

notice has been issued to Sri Thomurothu Kurma Rao S/o Ramulu on 19.01.2017

while enclosing a copy DLSC findings for submission of his representation / explanation

on the findings / recommendations of the DLSC within seven days from the date of

receipt of the show cause notice.

8

ANDHRA PRADESH GAZETTE, July 3, 2018

In response to the above show cause notice, Sri Thomurothu Kurma Rao S/o Ramulu

has submitted his explanation vide reference 11th read above, stating that .........

a) He came from poor family and in the year 1960 when he was admitted into

Sri.Rama UP School and his caste was recorded as “Konda Kapu-” and in

Transfer Certificate also the Head Mistres, AVNC High School, his caste

was recorded as “Konda Kapu”

b) In the year 1978, the Tahsildar, Visakhaptnam issued “Konda Kapu”

Certificate dt.30-10-78 to him.

c) In the year 1976, the then MLC Mr.M.A.Reddy issued “ konda Kapu”

certificate to him

d) After due process of selection by HPCL authorities, he was selected and

got job as Security Guard in a scale of Rs.725/- per month as Visakha

Refinery. At the time of his appointment he has produced all the original

record and his caste Konda Kapu ST certificate dated 30-10-1978 which

was issued by the Tahsildar,

e) He received a communication dt.26-6-1989 from the Administration of HPCL

authorities directing him to produce his caste certificates in original,

accordingly he has submitted his original caste certificates issued by then

MLC Mr.M.A.Reddy and another certificate dated 30-7-1981 issued by the

Tahsildar, Viskhapatnam.

f) He served with a departmental charge sheet dt.2-1-1993 by HPc authorities

wherein it was stated that as per the enquiry and order of the Distract

Collector dt. 12-9-1989, it is revealed that he had secured employment by

producing false caste certificate on that he has submitted his written

explanation to his employer along with school record and caste certificates.

The said enquiry concluded holding that he had produced false certificate

at the time of his admission and the HPCL authorities have issued a letter

dt.16-3-1994 by giving an opportunity by granting one month time to prove

his case. He was never served the order of the District Collector or the

reports of the Tahsildar, Visakhaptnam and the Sub Collector , Paderu

basing on which the Collector passed order dt.12-9-1989.Aggrieved by the

said order of the Dist. Collector dt.12-9-1989 he filed WP 7225/1995. The

Hon’ble High Court disposed the WP vide order dt.22-8- 1996.( as explained

in 2nd para)

ANDHRA PRADESH GAZETTE, July 3, 2018

9

g) He also submitted that he was born on 29-1-1954 and his caste and other

particulars are given by his parents to the concerned authorities, accordingly

the same was recorded in the school certificates and also subsequent to

the educational records.

h) He also stated that the reports of the Sub Collector and the Tashildar, Paderu

prove that his fore fathers were once resided in Saripalli village of Paderu

mandal and subsequently they migrated from the village, as such, he averred

that the findings of the above officers prove that his forefathers/parents are

residents of Paderu, as such his caste was mentioned as ‘Kondakapu”

i) He further stated that the report of the Tahsidlar, Visakhapatnam speaks

that the individual (T.Kurma rao s/o Ramulu) is a resident of Simhachalam,

and his parents native place was Edurupalli of Paderu mandal. His father

was a blacksmith worker, his mother was a hose wife and they have migrated

from Paderu to Vizianagaram and further to Visakhapatnam to eak out their

livelihood. Since, his parents migrated at the age of 2 years of the individual,

he does not know about the customs and habits of Konda kapu caste. He

averred that the report of the Tahsildar, Visakhapatnam established the fact

that his parents are residents of Paderu and subsequently came down to

Visakhapatnam for their livelihood as such his parents recorded his caste

as “ST- Kondakapu”. He further averred that the revenue officials

observations and their reports are in his favour .He also submitted that he

has performed the marriage of his daughter. His son aged about 32 years

who is an unemployee and suffering with hearing loss

j) The individual has quoted different sections of Indian Evidence Act and also

IPC and also some citations and rulings of the Hon’ble High Court in support

of his case and finally requested to set aside the order passed by the DLSC

and confirm his caste is as “ ST Konda Kapu and to issue necessary

proceedings to all concerned officers including HPCL authorities as

otherwise he will be put to irreparable loss and hardship.

After receiving his written explanation, again a notice has been issued to the

certificate holder i.e., Sri Thomurothu Kurma Rao S/o Ramulu in order to provide

another opportunity to the claimant to safeguard the principles of natural justice to

prove his case with a request to attend before the Collector, Visakhapatnam on

19-5-2018 at 11.00 AM in Collector’s Office, Visakhapatnam for making a

10

ANDHRA PRADESH GAZETTE, July 3, 2018

representation or any evidences if he wishes as per the Section 5 (1) of the Andhra

Pradesh (SC, ST & BCs) Regulation of Issue of Community Certificate Act, 1993,

Accordingly, the certificate holder i.e., Sri Thomurothu Kurma Rao S/o Ramulu

along with his counsel has attended before me on 19-5-2018 at 11.00 AM in Collector’s

Office, Visakhapatnam. Sri.A.RamMohan, Advocate, Visakhapatnam has filed Vakalat

on behalf of the claimant. The counsel has reiterated the contents of the written

explanation submitted by the individual dt.13-3-2017 . The counsel further argued that

at the time of childhood of the Sri. Thomortholu Kurma Rao, his parents got recorded

the caste as “ST-Kondakapu” in school records, as such, there is no fault of the

individual in this regard and also submitted that the individual has already retired from

service due to attaining the age of superannuation and his retirement benefits have

not been settled so far due to pendency of caste enquiry and it is unjust to enquire

about his case after his retirement and finally requested to consider the written

explanation and also citations mentioned therein and set aside the order passed by

the DLSC and confirm his caste is as “ ST Konda Kapu in the interest of justice.

The written explanation of Sri.Thumurothu Kurma Rao and the arguments of his

counsel have been taken into consideration and examined. In his written explanation

the individual contended that “that the reports of the Sub Collector and the Tashildar,

Paderu prove that his fore fathers were once resided in Saripalli village of Paderu

mandal and subsequently they migrated from the village, as such, he averred that the

findings of the above officers prove that his forefathers/parents are residents of Paderu,

as such his caste was mentioned as ‘Kondakapu” His contention that as per the reports

of Sub Collector & Tahdildar, Pader his forefathers/parents are residents of Saripalli

village in Paderu mandal may be correct but his further contention that his forefather/

parents being residents of Saripalli village in Paderu mandal their case was mentioned

as “ ST- Konda Kapu” is not acceptable and this argument does not stand for litmus

test. It is pertinent to note that a good number of non-trials have been residing in different

pockets of Agency area covered by 11 mandals in Paderu division (including in Paderu

mandal) since ancient times but due to their mere residence in agency area they can

not claim that their caste as tribal category.

He also argued that since, his parents migrated at the age of 2 years of the

individual, he does not know about the customs and habits of Kondakapu (ST) caste

is also not acceptable. While he is claiming his case status as KondaKapu(ST) even

in plain areas, he ought to have the knowledge of customs and habits of the said caste

which are supposed to be observed by him wherever he resides.

ANDHRA PRADESH GAZETTE, July 3, 2018

11

It is astonishing to note that though Sri Thomurothu Kurma Rao S/o Ramulu has

been claiming Konda Kapu(ST) caste status and obtained Konda Kapu(ST) Certificates

form the Taahildar, Visakhaptnam and obtained job in HPCL by virtue of those caste

certificates , he did not choose to claim his own caste to his two own children

(son & daughter). He also not stated about his own brothers and sisters and their

caste status or atleast he has not mentioned about any of his relatives and their caste

status. This observation itself speaks a volume about the genuineness of the caste

claim (ST-Konda Kapu) of the individual Sri.T.kurma Rao.

Moreover the individual has failed to produce the original certificates either

before the DLSC or before this authority. His contention that he has handed over his

original caste certificates to HPCL authorities at the time of his joining in HPC is proved

to be false since in response to the request of the Joint Collector & Chairman, DLSC,

Visakhapatnam, the Deputy General Manager, HPCL, Visakha Refinery,

Visakhapatnam has stated that, “ the statement of Sri Thomurothu Kurma Rao S/o

Ramulu that he has submitted the original certificates to HPCL authorities at the time

of appointment is “False”, as they do not have any practice of obtaining the original

certificates from their employees and retaining them for any period or reason”.

The argument of the counsel that at the time of childhood of the Sri. Thomortholu

Kurma Rao, his parents have given the particulars of their caste etc., to the concerned

authorities and accordingly the same was recorded in the school certificates and also

subsequent to the educational records, as such, , there is no fault of the individual in

this regard is not acceptable. This contention does not stand for legal scrutiny since

the claimant is the ultimate beneficiary by securing the ST-Konda Kapu certificate and

by virtue of the same he got employment. He can not get any shelter by throwing the

responsibility on his parents on the pretext that at his childhood his parents got recorded

his caste as ST-Konda Kapu in school records. At least, the individual has not put forth

any justified reason why the individual has not chosen to claim the same case (i.e.,ST-

Konda kora) which is being claimed by him to his own two children. Moreover as per

the family tree of Sri.Thomoruthu Kurma Rao (as reported by the Revenue Divisional

Officer, Visakhapatnam) it is crystal clearly established that his own two children (Son

& Daughter) belong to Kapu (caste) which is very astonishing and peculiar.

The delinquent has not put forth any evidences/proofs regarding anthropological

and ethnological traits, deities, rituals, customs, mode of marriages, death ceremonies/

method of burial of dead bodies etc., which are being observed by them on par with

real Konda Kapu (ST) people in support of his caste claim. Though, the burden of

12

ANDHRA PRADESH GAZETTE, July 3, 2018

proof of his caste status lies on him, the individual Sri Thomurothu Kurma Rao has

miserable failed to do so. Further, the individual has quoted different sections of Indian

Evidence Act and also IPC and also some citations and rulings of the Hon’ble High

Court in support of his case which are irrelevant to the case on hand.

After hearing the individual and his counsel and on considering the contents of

the explanation of Sri Thomurothu Kurma Rao, and on perusal of the material placed

before me, taking into consideration of recommendations of the District Level Scrutiny

Committee, Visakhapatnam and in the absence of substantive evidences on part of

the certificate holder , I have no hesitation to accept the recommendation of the DLSC.

I am of the opinion that, Sri Thomurothu Kurma Rao S/o Ramulu does not belongs to

ST -Konda Kapu , as such, the certificates held by the individual deserve cancellation.

In view of the of the reasons explained above and in exercise of the powers

conferred under Section 5 (1) of the Andhra Pradesh (Scheduled Castes, Scheduled

Tribes and Backward Classes) Regulation of Issue of Community Certificate Act 1993

read with rule 9 (7) of the Andhra Pradesh (Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and

Backward Classes) Regulation of Issue of Community Certificate Rules, 1997, the ST

Konda Kapu caste certificate said to have been issued by the Tahsildar, Visakhapatnam

vide RC.NO.2020/78 dt:28.06.1978 & D.DIS.N0.2205/81/A4 DT: 15.07.1981 and MLC

on 07.07.1976 infavour of Sri Thomurothu Kurma Rao S/o Ramulu is hereby cancelled

with immediate effect.

A notification to this effect shall be published in the District Extra ordinary

Gazettee.

NOTE: AN APPEAL AGAINST THIS ORDER LIES TO THE GOVERNMENT WITHIN

30 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF RECEIPT OF THIS ORDER.

PRAVIN KUMAR,

Collector & District Magistrate,

Visakhapatnam.

Dated : 11-6-2018

ANDHRA PRADESH GAZETTE, July 3, 2018

13

To

Sri. Thomurothu Kurma Rao S/o Ramulu resident of D.No.14-50/13, T4, Plot No.17,

Vijaya Sai Enclave, Near Simhachalam Depot, Visakhapatnam.

14

ANDHRA PRADESH GAZETTE, July 3, 2018

NOTIFICATION

(M) D.DIS.NO.1806/2012C5,- In accordance with Section 5 (1) of the Andhra

Pradesh (Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Backward Classes) Regulation

of Issue of Community Certificate Act 1993 read with rule 9 (7) of the Andhra Pradesh

(Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Backward Classes) Regulation of Issue of

Community Certificate Rules, 1997 communicated in GO.MS.NO.58 Social Welfare

Department DT: 12.05.1997, the ST Konda Kapu caste certificate said to have been

issued by Tahsildar, Visakhapatnam Urban vide RC. NO. 2020/78 dt:28.06.1978 &

D.DIS.NO.2205/81/A4 DT: 15.07.1981 and MLC on 07.07.1976 infavour of Sri

Thomurothu Kurma Rao S/o Ramulu is hereby cancelled vide (M) R.DIS.

NO. 1806/2012/C5 DT: .05.2018.

Published and Uploaded by the Commissioner of Printing, Government of Andhra Pradesh at

Government Regional Press, Vijayawada, www.apegazette.cgg.gov.in

--x--

PRAVIN KUMAR,

Collector & District Magistrate,

Visakhapatnam.

Dated : 11-6-2018