REGD. NO. D. L.-33004/99
The Gazette of India
EXTRAORDINARY
PART I—Section 1
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
No. 267 ]
NEW DELHI, FRIDAY, OCTOBER 11, 2002/ASV1NA 19, 1924
3187 GI/2002
(1)
2
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: EXTRAORDINARY
[PART I—SEC. I]
3
4
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: EXTRAORDINARY
[PART I—SEC. 1)
5
MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY
(Department of Commerce)
(DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF ANTI-DUMPING AND ALLIED DUTIES)
INITIATION NOTIFICATION
New Delhi, the 8th October, 2002
Subject: Initiation of Anti-Dumping investigation concerning imports of Caustic Soda from Chinese Taipei,
Indonesia and EU excluding France.
No. 14/39/2002-DGAD.—M/s Alkali Manufacturers Association of India (AMAI),
Delhi on behalf of the Domestic industry has filed a petition, in
accordance with the customs Tariff (Amendment) Act, 1995 and Customs
Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-Dumping Duty
on dumped articles and for determination of duty) Rules, 1995 before the
Designated Authority (hereinafter referred to as the Authority) alleging
dumping of Caustic Soda from Chinese Taipei, Indonesia and EU
excluding France (hereinafter called subject countries) and has requested
for Anti-Dumping investigation and levy of Anti-Dumping Duties
retrospectively from the date of initiation of investigation.
!•
Domestic Industry:- The petition has been filed by M/s. Alkali
Manufactures Association of India (AMAI), Delhi on behalf of the
domestic industry. The Association represents most of all the domestic
manufacturers of Caustic Soda in India.
The petition has been
expressedly been supported by the following domestic producers, i.e.
M/s. DCW Ltd., Mumbai, M/s. Gujarat Alkalies & Chemicals Ltd.,
Baroda, M/s. Search Chem. Industries Ltd., Mumbai, M/s. Grasim
Industries Ltd., Nagada (MP), M/s. SIEL Chemical Complex, Punjab,
M/s. Bihar Caustic & Chemicals Ltd., Jharkhand, M/s. Jayshree
Chemicals Ltd., Orissa and M/s. Andhra Sugars Ltd., Tanaku,. These
petitioners companies represents 40.09% of the subject good under
production and with support of M/s. Indian Petrochemicals Corporation
Ltd., Vadodara, M/s. Standard Alkali, Mumbai, and M/s. DCM Shriram
Consolidated Ltd., New Delhi they represent 55.67%. As per the evidence
available petitioners have the standing to file the case for anti dumping
investigation on behalf of domestic industry as per rule 5 of Anti
Dumping Rules.
6
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: EXTRAORDINARY
[PART I—SEC, 1]
2.
Product under consideration:- The product under consideration
is known as Sodium Hydroxide Commonly known as Caustic Soda
(hereinafter referred to as subject goods). It is chemically known as
NAOH.. It is an inorganic chemical and is soapy, strongly alkaline
odorless chemical. Caustic Soda finds application in various fields like
manufacture of pulp and paper, newsprint, viscose yarn, staple fiber,
aluminum, cotton, and laundry soaps, detergent, dyestuff drugs and
Pharmaceuticals, vanaspati, petroleum refining, etc. Caustic Soda is
available in two forms i.e. Lye and solids. The present investigation
covers all forms of Caustic soda. Caustic Soda is classified under chapter
28 of the customs sub-headings 2815.11 and 2815.12 of custom tariff
Act, 1975. The classification is, however indicative only and is in no way
binding on the scope of the present investigation.
Petitioners have
requested to initiate the anti dumping investigation against the product
under consideration irrespective of the types/grades under which they
are being imported.
3.
Countries involved: The countries involved in the present
investigation are Chinese Taipei, Indonesia and EU excluding France
(hereinafter referred to as subject countries).
4.
Like articles: Caustic Soda produced by the domestic industries
and imported from subject countries are comparable in terms of
characteristic functions, uses, product specification, pricing, distribution
and marketing, and tariff classification of the goods.
The two are
technically
and
commercially
substitutable
and it
is
used
interchangeably.
Therefore, for the purpose of investigation the Caustic
Soda produced by the petitioner is being treated as like product of
Caustic Soda (hereinafter referred to as subject goods) imported from
subject countries within the meaning of the Anti Dumping Rules.
5.
Normal value: The Authority notes that the petitioner has claimed
normal value of subject goods in Chinese Taipei, Indonesia, and EU
excluding France on the basis of information provided by the petitioner
form leading International journal, i.e., Chlor Alkali. Chlor Alkali reports
the prices of Caustic Soda in the domestic market in Chinese Taipei,
Indonesia, and EU excluding France.
Thus the authority has prHma
facie, consider the normal value of the subject goods in subject countries
on the basis of constructed cost of production as made available by the
petitioner and it has been considered by the Authority for the purpose of
initiation.
6.
Export Price: The export price has been claimed on the basis of
data obtained from Director General Commercial Intelligence and
Statistics, Kolkata and compiled from
secondary sources. Price
7
adjustments have been claimed on account of Ocean freight, marine
insurance, inland transportation in the country of exports, port handling
and port charges, commissions etc to arrive at the net export price.
There is sufficient evidence of export price and the adjustments claimed
for the subject goods from the subject countries.
7.
Dumping margin: There is sufficient evidence that the normal
value of the subject goods in the subject countries is significantly higher
than the net export price indicating prima-facie that the subject goods
are being dumped by the exporters from the subject countries.
8.
Injury and Causal Link : The petitioners have furnished evidence
regarding the injury having taken place as a result of the alleged
dumping in the form of fall in their market share because of increased
volurnc of dumped imports, decline in sales volume and utilisation of
capacity, lost sales and substantial decline in profitability for the
domestic industries. The Authority notes that the installed capacity and
availability of sufficiently freely disposable subject goods by the exporters
of Chinese Taipei coupled with the prevailing offer price of subject good
in India, pose a threat of material injury to the domestic industry by way
of price suppression and undercutting. There is prima-facie sufficient
evidence of the material injury being suffered by the petitioner caused by
dumped imports from subject countries.
9.
Initiation of Anti-Dumping investigation: The Authority in view
of the foregoing paragraphs, initiates anti-dumping investigation into the
existence, degree and effect of alleged dumping of the subject goods
originating in or exported from the subject countries.
10.
Period of investigation:
The period of investigation for the
purpose of present investigation is 1st January 2002 to 30th September
2002.
11.
Submission of Information: The exporters and importers known
to be concerned and domestic industry are being informed separately to
enable them to file all information relevant in the form and manner
prescribed.
Any other party interested to participate in the present
investigation may write to:
The Designated Authority
(Directorate General of Anti-Dumping & Allied Duties)
Government of India
Ministry of Commerce & Industry
brtyog Bhwvan, New ftotfiMiOOll.
8
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: EXTRAORDINARY
[PART I—SEC. 1]
12.
Time limit: Any information relating to this investigation should
be sent in writing so as to reach the Authority at the above address not
later than 40 days from the date of publication of this notification. If no
information is received within the prescribed time limit or the
information received is incomplete, the Authority may record their
findings on the basis of the facts available on record in accordance with
the Rules supra.
13.
INSPECTION OF PUBLIC FILE:
In terms of rule 6(7) any
interested party may inspect the public file containing non-confidential
versions of the evidence submitted by other interested parties.
14.
All interested parties shall provide a confidential summary in
terms of Rule 7 (2), for the confidential information provided as per Rule
7 (1) of the Rules supra.
15.
In case any interested party refuses access to and otherwise does
not provide necessary information within a reasonable period, or
significantly impedes the investigation, the Authority may record its
findings on the basis of the facts available to it and make such
recommendations to the Central Governments as deemed fit.
L. V. SAPTHAR1SHI, Designated Authority
Primed by the Manager, Govt. of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi-110064
and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi-] 10054