jftLVªh laö Mhö ,yö&33004@99

REGD. NO. D. L.-33004/99

vlk/kj.k

EXTRAORDINARY

Hkkx III—[k.M 4

PART III—Section 4

izkf/dkj ls izdkf'kr

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

la- 317]

ubZ fnYyh] c`gLifrokj] fnlEcj 5] 2013@vxzgk;.k 14] 1935

No. 317]

NEW DELHI, THURSDAY, DECEMBER 5, 2013/AGRAHAYANA 14, 1935

egkiRru iz’kqYd izkf/kdj.k

vf/klwpuk

eqEcbZ] 3 fnlEcj] 2013

lalalala- Vh,,eih@41@2013&lhvksihVh

Vh,,eih@41@2013&lhvksihVh

Vh,,eih@41@2013&lhvksihVh-&egkiRru U;kl vf/kfu;e] 1963 ¼1963 dk 38½ dh /kkjk 48 vkSj 49 }kjk iznRr ‘kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,]

egkiRru iz’kqYd izkf/kdj.k ,rn~}kjk layXu vkns’kkuqlkj] vkns’k la- Vh,,eih@49@2011&lhvksihVh fnukad 1 vizSy }kjk vuqeksfnr vius ekStwnk njeku esa fu/kkZfjr

ihvks,y mRiknksa ij ?kkV’kqYd dh leh{kk djus ds fy, dksphu iRru U;kl ls izkIr izLrko dk fuiVku djrk gSA

egkiRru iz’kqYd izkf/kdj.k

ekeyk la

ekeyk la- Vh,,eih@41@2013&lhvksihVh

Vh,,eih@41@2013&lhvksihVh

dksje%

(i)

Jh Vh-,l- ckyklqczg~e.;e] lnL; ¼foRr½

(ii)

Jh lh-ch- flag] lnL; ¼vFkZ’kkL=½

vkns'k

¼uoEcj 2013 ds 15osa fnu ikfjr½

;g ekeyk dksphu iRru U;kl ¼lhvksihVh½ ls mlds ekStwnk njeku esa fu/kkZfjr fd, x, ihvks,y mRiknksa ij ?kkV’kqYd izHkkjksa dh leh{kk djus ds fy,

izkIr gq, izLrko ls lacaf/kr gSA

lhvksihVh ds ekStwnk njeku vkns’k la- Vh,,eih@49@2011&lhvksihVh] fnukad 1 vizSy] 2013 }kjk vuqeksfnr fd;k x;k Fkk ftls 10 twu] 2013 dks

Hkkjr ds jkti= esa vf/klwfpr fd;k x;k FkkA

3-1-

lhvksihVh us vius i= fnukad 19 vxLr] 2013 }kjk ihvks,y mRiknksa ij ?kkV’kqYd izHkkjksa dh leh{kk djus ds fy, vuqjks/k fd;k FkkA bl laca/k esa]

lhvksihVh }kjk fd, x, fuosnuksa dks uhps lkjc) fd;k x;k gS%&

(i)

dksphu vkW;y VfeZuy ¼lhvksVh½] ukWFkZ VSadj cFkZ ¼,uVhch½ vkSj lkÅFk VSadj cFkZ ¼,lVhch½ ih,l;w tSls chihlh,y&dsvkj] ,pihlh,y vkSj

vkbZvkslh,y }kjk dPps rsy lfgr ihvks,y mRiknksa dk 1996&97 ls ?kkV’kqYd njksa esa fcuk dksbZ o`f) fd, vkt dh rkjh[k rd #0 65 izfr

Vu dh nj ls izgLru dj jgs gSaA

(ii)

Ok”kZ fnlEcj 2007 esa chihlh,y&dsvkj }kjk ,lih,e dh ‘kq:vkr fd, tkus ds ckn] lhvksVh esa izgfLrr ek=k esa dkQh gn rd deh vkbZ

gSA chihlh,y&dsvkj dh fjQkbfuax {kerk esa 7-5 ls 9-5 ,e,eVh izfro”kZ dh o`f) ds ckotwn bl lefiZr lqfo/kk dh mi;ksx {kerk esa deh

vkbZ gSA

(iii)

lhvksihVh vkSj chihlh,y&dsvkj ds chp 11 twu] 2003 dks gq, le>kSrk Kkiu ds vuqlkj] iRru dks lhvksVh esa 9-14 eh- Mqcko cuk, j[kus

dh t:jr gSA rFkkfi] eS0 bafM;k xsVos VfeZuy izkbosV fyfeVsM ¼vkbZthVhih,y½ ds lkFk lkafofnd ck/;rk ds fgLls ds :Ik esa] lhvksihVh dks

cFkZ D;w 8&D;w 9 esa 12-5 eh0 Mqcko cuk, j[kuk gSA pwafd lhvksVh D;w 8 vkSj D;w 9 tSls leku {ks= esa gS] blfy, lhvksVh esa 12-5 eh0 dk

Mqcko miyC/k FkkA bl izdkj] chihlh,y&dsvkj vkSj vU; rsy ih,l;w us u dsoy fcuk fdlh vfrfjDr ykxr ds xgjs Mqcko dk vkuan

mBk;k gS vfirq xgjs Mqcko okys iksrksa rFkk of/kZr iklZy vkdkjksa dks ykdj ekyHkkM+s dh ferO;;rk ds eku ls ykHk Hkh mBk;k gSA

5118 GI/2013

(1)

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY

[PART III—SEC. 4]

(iv)

vkbZthVhih,y esa daVsuj izgLru izpkyu Qjojh 2011 esa vkbZlhVhVh] okykjikne esa LFkkukarfjr gks pqds gSaA blfy,] D;w 8 vkSj D;w 9 esa

12-5 Mqcko cuk, j[kus dh ck/;rk [kRe gks pqdh gSA iRru dks lhvksVh esa dsoy 9-14 eh- Mqcko cuk, j[kus dh t:jr gS vkSj 12-5 eh-

Mqcko cuk, j[kus ds fy, dksbZ vkSfpR; ugha Fkk tSlk fd;k x;k Fkk] fo’ks”k :Ik ls lhvksVh esa de gksrh ek=kvksa ds en~nsutjA

(v)

vr% iRru us Mqcko dks de djds 9-14 eh0 djus vFkok ihvks,y mRiknksa ij ?kkV’kqYd ds ykxr fooj.k dh leh{kk djus dk fu.kZ; fy;k

gSA pwafd lexz iksr lacaf/kr vk; ?kkVk n’kkZrh gS] blfy, vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k dh vkuqikfrd ykxr dks ihvks,y mRiknksa esa izHkkftr fd;k x;k

FkkA rFkkfi] vf/klwpuk fnukad 10 twu 2013 esa bl izkf/kdj.k }kjk la’kksf/kr fd, x, vuqekuksa esa] ihvks,y mRiknksa ds fy, izHkkftr fud”kZ.k

ykxrksa ij bl izkf/kdj.k }kjk fopkj ugha fd;k x;k FkkA blds QyLo:Ik o”kZ 2012&13 ls 2014&15 ds fy, ihvks,y izgLru xfrfof/k esa

vf/k’ks”k gqvk FkkA

(vi)

Mqcko dks de djus ds fy, iRru dh bPNk ds ckjs esa lwfpr djus ds fy, twu 2013 esa rsy ih,l;w ds lkFk ,d cSBd vk;ksftr dh xbZ

FkhA rsy ih,l;w us bPNk O;Dr dh Fkh fd lhvksVh esa 12-5 eh0 Mqcko cuk, j[kk tkuk pkfg, vkSj bl laca/k esa ns; vfrfjDr izHkkj ogu

djus ds fy, lger Fks] c’krsZ ,sls izHkkj bl izkf/kdj.k }kjk vuqeksfnr fd, x, gksaA

3-2-

lhvksihVh }kjk dgh xbZ vU; ckrksa dks uhps lkjc) fd;k x;k gS%&

(i)

Vh,,eih fn’kkfunsZ’k izklafxd dk;Zokfg;ksa esa lqfopkfjr fjdkWMksZa ds le{k izdV =qfV;ksa dh lhek rd lhfer djus ds fy, vkns’kksa dh leh{kk

djus dh vuqefr nsrs gSa] c’krsZ ,slk vkosnu 2005 ds fn’kkfunsZ’kksa ds [kaM 3-3-1 }kjk vkf/kdkfjd jkti= esa vf/klwpuk ds 30 fnuksa ds Hkhrj

nkf[ky fd;k x;k gksA

(ii)

bl izkf/kdj.k ds le{k ;g fuosnu lhvksihVh esa vlk/kkj.k fLFkfr dh otg ls ihvks,y izgLru xfrfof/k ds fy, vkns’kksa dh leh{kk djus ds

fy, gS D;ksafd ;g fcuk deUl;wjsV vk; ds vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ij gksus okys O;; dh otg ls xfrfof/k esa xaHkhj ?kkVk fLFkfr ds lkFk la?k”kZ

dj jgk gSA

(iii)

fiNys lkr o”kksZa ds nkSjku iRru dk foRrh; dk;Zfu”iknu uhps rkfydkc) fd;k x;k gS%&

(#0 djksM+ksa esa)

fooj.k

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

2012-13

izpkyu vk;

212.08

219.94

208.40

232.07

276.08

307.10

311.61

izpkyu O;;

147.57

181.20

195.46

232.95

274.49

282.14

367.39

izpkyu vf/k’ks”k@?kkVk

64.51

38.73

12.94

-0.88

1.59

24.96

-55.78

,Q ,aM ,e vk;

21.28

27.62

21.38

19.23

35.69

35.10

134.43

,Q ,aM ,e O;;

59.13

61.86

49.07

107.61

123.36

143.98

143.80

fuoy vf/k’ks”k@?kkVk

26.66

4.49

-14.75

-89.26

-86.08

-83.91

-65.15

izpkyu vuqikr (%)

100

118

(iv)

31 ekpZ 2013 dks iRru dk dqy uqdlku #0 298-84 djksM+ gSA orZeku esa izfrekg #0 20 djksM+ ds jktLo vUrj dk lkeuk djrk gS vkSj

viuh isa’ku U;kl fuf/k dk mi;ksx vizSy 2013 ls vkxs isa’ku ds Hkqxrku ds fy, fd;k tk jgk gSA rc rd jktLo vUrj yxHkx #0 7 ls

#0 8 djksM+ izfr ekg gSA

(v)

dksphu iRru varjkZ”Vªh; f’kfiax pSuyksa ds fudV fLFkr vius HkkSxksfyd&j.kuhfrd :Ik ls egRoiw.kZ LFkku ds fy, e’kgwj gS( ;g bu pSuyksa

dk fudVre egkiRru gSA bu ekxksZ ls lehirk egRoiw.kZ gS D;ksafd bu ekxksZ ij pyus okys cM+s ty;ku ekxZ ls U;wure foiFku dh vis{kk

djrs gq, iRruksa dks Nwus ds fy, gSA

(vi)

bldk HkkSxksfyd ykHk Hkkjh vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ds HkkSxksfyd&eksjQyksftdy ds lkFk vkrk gSA 21 fefy;u ?ku ehVj ds okf”kZd flyVs’ku Hkkj

ij] lhvksihVh dks Hkkjr esa vf/kdre flyVs’ku Hkkj ds lkFk iRru cuus ds fy, M;wfc;l fMLVhD’ku vftZr fd;k gSA bl izdkj] vuqj{k.k

fud”kZ.k iRru ij izeq[k leL;k jgk gSA

(vii)

Hkkjr esa vf/kdrj vU; iRruksa esa etcwr igkM+h ckWVe gS] rkfd ,d ckj vf/kd ykxr ls iwath fud”kZ.k iwjk gks tk, rks blds lkFk dk;Z

djus ds fy, yxHkx dksbZ flyVs’ku ugha gS] tks bEiykbZ djrk gS fd vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k dh vko’;drk ugha gSA ijUrq] dksphu iRru esa

dhpM+ okyk ckWVe gS] tks flyVs’ku rFkk vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ls tqM+k gqvk gSA

(viii)

lhvksihVh esa fud”kZ.k djkj esa ewY;&fu/kkZj.k dh i)fr 2000&01 ls ^gVk, x, flYV dk izfr ?ku ehVj^^ ls ^lEiw.kZ fofufnZ”V vof/k esa pSuy

ds Mqcko dk vuqj{k.k^ esa ifjofrZr dh xbZ gSA tcfd ;g xgjkbZ;ka miyC/k djokus dh T;knk izHkkoh dk;Zi)fr gS] ;g vf/kd [kphZyh gks

tk,xh D;ksafd blds fy, Bsdsnkj dks o”kZ Hkj fud”kZ.k O;ofLFkr djuk gksxk tSlk vU; iRruksa esa ugha djuk iM+rk gSA

fooj.k

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

2012-13

fud"kZ.k {kerk ¼,e ?k- eh-½

vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr

¼#0 djksM+ksa esa½

56.83

66.22

84.37

63.72

123.92

izpkyu ykxr ¼#0 djksM+ksa esa½

195.46

232.95

274.49

282.14

367.39

izpkyu ykxr izfr’kr

29%

28%

31%

23%

34%

¹Hkkx IIIµ[k.M 4º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vlk/kj.k

(ix)

izpkyu ykxr ds izfr’kr :Ik esa vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k O;; dksydkrk iRru U;kl ¼dsvksihVh½ ds fy, dsoy nwljk gS] tSlkfd 2010&11 ds fy,

vkadM+s uhps fn[kk, x, gSa%&

dksydkrk

ksydkrk

ksydkrk dksphu

dksphu

esesesesaxywj

axywj

dkaMyk

ikjknhi

eq:xkao

fotkx

fotkx Tks,uihVh

Tks,uihVh

Tks,uihVh ,echihVh

,echihVh

,Uuksj

psUubZ

Rkwrhdksfju

(x)

dsvksihVh vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ij izfro”kZ yxHkx #0 400 djksM+ [kpZ djrk gS tcfd lhvksihVh us yxHkx #0 105 djksM+ $ lfoZl VSDl

izfro”kZ ds fy, Mªsftax dkiksZjs’ku vkWQ bafM;k ds lkFk 3 o”kksZa ds fy, fud”kZ.k gsrq djkj fd;k gSA o”kZ 2012&13 esa] dksphu iRru us vuqj{k.k

fud”kZ.k ij #0 123-92 djksM+ [kpZ fd, gSaA lHkh vU; egkiRruksa us vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ij #0 50&60 djksM+ izfro”kZ ls de [kpZ fd, gSaA

(xi)

rFkkfi] dsvksihVh rFkk lhvksihVh esa vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k O;; ds laO;ogkj ds chp dkjfMuy vUrj gSA dsvksihVh ds vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k O;; dk

yxHkx 90 izfr’kr Hkkjr ljdkj }kjk fuf/kfjr fd;k tkrk gS blfy, bls iRru mi;ksDrkvksa ls olwy djus dh vko’;drk ugha gksxh

tcfd lhvksihVh dks vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ds fy, dksbZ lfClMh ugha feyh gS vkSj blfy, bls iRru mi;ksDrkvksa ls olwyh djuh gksxhA

(xii)

vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ij O;; iksr lacaf/kr izHkkjksa ¼ohvkjlh½ ds ek/;e ls iRruksa }kjk olwy fd;k tkrk gSA blfy,] lhvksihVh esa ohvkjlh vU;

izfrLi/khZ iRruksa ls mPprj gSA

12 ?kaVs fojke ds fy, fofHkUu iRruksa esa 14]036 thvkjVh okys iksr ds fy, ohvkjlh

ohvkjlh

vesfjdh

MkWyj esa

dksphu

psUubZ

rwrhdksfju

Tks,uihVh

eqUnzk

dksyEcks

17162

8066

8361

5468

8379

2803

(xiii)

iRru dks izfrLi/kkZ cuk, j[kus ds fy, ohvkjlh ij fj;k;rsa nsuh gksaxhA mlesa lhek,a gSa ftlesa ohvkjlh vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k O;; ds lkFk vkxs

yknk tk ldrk gSA bl izdkj dh Vh,,eih ;kstuk esa] iRru ds jktLo ncko ds fu/kkZj.k ds fy, iRru ds jktLo dks okfil tksM+k tkrk

gSA ;g fuosnu fd;k x;k gS fd bl lhek rd iRru dk jktLo ncko le>k tk ldrk gS] D;ksafd ;g okLro esa ohvkjlh jktLo Qksjxksu

vFkok lsdjhQkbTM gSA

(xiv)

nwljh rjQ] lhvksihVh dh rqyuk esa vU; iRruksa ij vf/kd mPprj njsa vnk djus okyh rsy dEifu;ksa ds lkFk ihvks,y ds fy, ?kkV’kqYd

c<+kus dh xqatkb’k gS] tSlkfd fuEufyf[kr rkfydk ls ns[kk tk ldrk gS%&

iRru

dksfPp

U;w esaxywj

eqUnzk

ikjknhi

dksydkrk

dkdhukMk

,Uuksj

?kkV’kqYd

¼#0 izfr eh-V-½

112.5

134

100

(xv)

lhvksihVh esa ihvks,y ds fy, #0 65 izfr eh-V- dk ?kkV’kqYd Vh,,eih ds vfLrRo esa vkus ls igys fu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k Fkk vkSj vc Hkh fcuk

cnyko ds tkjh gSA nj #0 160 izfr eh-V- gksuh pkfg, Hkys gh bls MCY;wihvkbZ o`f);ksa ds fy, lek;ksftr fd;k x;k gksrkA Hkys gh ;fn

bls 60 izfr’kr dh lhfer lhek rd MCY;wihvkbZ o`f);ksa ls lwpdkafdr fd;k x;k gksrk tSlk 2008 fn’kkfunsZ’kksa esa ifjdfYir fd;k x;k gS]

;g vkt #0 96 izfr eh-V- gksuk pkfg, FkkA ijUrq Vh,,eih ykxr&fu/kkZj.k rjhds ds v/khu] ?kkV’kqYd o”kZ 1996 ls #0 65 izfr eh-V- ij

fu/kkZfjr cuk gqvk gS D;ksafd ;g xfrfof/k vf/k’ks”k esa gSA

Vh,,eih fn’kkfunsZ’kksa ds vuqlkj 2012&13 esa lhvksVh] ,uVhch rFkk ,lVhch vk;

(#0 djksM+ksa esa

#0 djksM+ksa esa

#0 djksM+ksa esa)

C;ksjs

vk;

O;;

vf/k’ks”k@?kkVk

iRru ns;rk,a

3.07

30.35

-27.28

ikbyVst

11.19

34.99

-23.80

cFkZ fdjk;k

4.31

29.66

-25.35

dqy ¼d½

18.57

95.00

-76.43

?kkV’kqYd ¼[k½

22.00

6.87

15.13

dqy vk; ¼d½ $ ¼[k½

40.57

101.86

-61.29

(xvi)

pwafd bl izkf/kdj.k }kjk vaxhd`r ijaijkxr n`f”Vdks.k ?kkV’kqYd esa o`f) dh vuqefr ugha nsxk] blfy, lhvksihVh us ekStwnk iz’kqYd pØ ds

fy, lkekU; iz’kqYd la’kks/ku ds fgLls ds :Ik esa fuosnu fd;k Fkk fd iz’kqYdksa esa o`f) fd, tkus dh t:jr ugha gSA rFkkfi] izkf/kdj.k ls

vuqjks/k fd;k x;k gS fd gekjh foRrh; fLFkfr ij fopkj djrs gq, ihvks,y ?kkV’kqYd esa o`f) fd, tkus ij fopkj fd;k tk,A

(xvii) Vh,,eih fn’kkfunsZ’k] 2005 esa dqN ,slk ugha gS tks dsoy ohvkjlh ls olwy fd, tkus okys vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k O;; dh vis{kk djsA ;g

Vh,,eih }kjk ifjpkfyr ykxr izi= gS tks n’kkZrk gS fd vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k O;; ohvkjlh esa gh yknk tk,xk ?kkV’kqYd esa ughaA

(xviii) bldh isD;wyj ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa fn;k x;k gS fd iRru us ,lvksvkj ij izkf/kdj.k dks vius lHkh fuosnuksa esa ohvkjlh dh ctk; ?kkV’kqYd esa

vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k O;; yknus dh dksf’k’k dh FkhA rFkkfi] izkf/kdj.k us bls gj ckj [kkfjt+ djus ds fy, mi;qDr ik;k FkkA ¼bl laca/k esa]

lhvksihVh us vius lkekU; la’kks/ku izLrko ij bl izkf/kdj.k }kjk ikfjr fd, x, 2007] 2010 vkSj 2013 ds iz’kqYd vkns’k ds izklafxd lkj

iqu% izLrqr fd, gSaA½

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY

[PART III—SEC. 4]

(xix)

VSDl njsa vkSj fofu;fer iz’kqYd fu/kkZfjr djus esa izHkko vkSj ?kVuk ds chp fVIi.kh ns[kuk egRoiw.kZ gSA

(xx)

;g fn;k x;k gS fd ohvkjlh dh vkf[kjdkj ?kVuk vkSj rsy f’kiesaV ds fy, ?kkV’kqYd ds lkFk&lkFk iRru rsy dEifu;ksa ij gS] ohvkjlh

ds ek/;e ls vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k O;; dk cks> Hkh T;knk ugha Mkyk tkuk pkfg,A okLro esa] ohvkjlh ds :Ik esa iRru ds fMVjesaV ds fy,

dsoy ohvkjlh d`R;ksa esa gh vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k O;; yknus ds fy, ncko igys ls gh xSj&izfrLi/kkZRed gSa tcfd ?kkV’kqYd esa o`f) fd, tkus

dh xqatkb’k vHkh Hkh gSA ;g uksV fd;k tk, fd lkekU; ekud ls foiFku U;w esaxywj iRru U;kl ds ekeys esa bl izkf/kdj.k }kjk igys gh

fd;k tk pqdk gSA

(xxi)

fnlEcj 2007 esa chihlh,y }kjk flaxy IokbaV ewfjax ¼,lih,e½ ds laLFkkiu dk lhvksihVh dh foRrh; fLFkfr;ksa ij fu.kkZ;d izHkko iM+sxkA

,lih,e ij ?kkV’kqYd #0 25 izfr eh-V- gS tcfd og vkarfjd cFkksZa ¼lhvksVh] ,uVhch rFkk ,lVhch½ esa #0 65 izfr eh-V- gSA ,lih,e us

lHkh dPps rsy dks ogka ij foifFkr fd;k gSA iRru ds rsy jktLoksa us nksckjk #0 90-95 djksM+ ds 2006&07 ds Lrj dks ikj djus esa 4

lkyksa dk le; fy;k Fkk] vkSj ;g dsoy 2011&12 esa Fkk fd rsy jktLo #0 103-75 djksM+ us 2006&07 ds Lrj dks ikj fd;k gSA gkykafd

dPpk rsy vkSj ihvks,y mRikn iRru ds ;krk;kr ds 70 izfr’kr gSa] iRru ds jktLoksa dk dsoy ,d&frgkbZ gh igys ds 43 izfr’kr ds

foijhr bl O;olk; ls vc l`ftr fd, x, gSa] tSlkfd uhps fn, x, vkadM+ksa ls ns[kk tk ldrk gS%&

dksphu iRru U;kl dk rsy jktLo

(#0 djksM+ksa esa

#0 djksM+ksa esa

#0 djksM+ksa esa)

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

2012-13

lhvksVh

65.68

58.39

19.21

26.07

24.9

31.39

23.5

,uVhch

17.67

12.37

10.89

12.68

16.48

14.37

13.58

,lVhch

7.6

7.04

1.44

2.77

2.6

5.85

3.47

,lih,e

5.95

40.18

19.39

46.22

52.34

63.26

dqy

90.95

83.75

71.72

60.91

90.20

103.75

103.81

izpkyu vk;

212.08

220.09

208.4

232.07

276.08

307.75

311.61

fgLlsnkjh %

43%

38%

34%

26%

33%

34%

33%

(xxii) tc dPpk rsy FkzqiqV lhvksVh ls ,lih,e rd fuokZflr fd;k x;k Fkk] lhvksVh esa {kerk mi;ksx 26 izfr’kr ij igqap x;k Fkk] jktLoksa ls

ldyr% vf/kd VfeZuy ij O;; ds lkFk tc fud”kZ.k ij fopkj fd;k tkrk gSA ijUrq] chihlh,y] tks vc Hkh lhvksVh esa FkzqiqV dk 87

izfr’kr gS] vHkh Hkh lhvksVh ij 12-5 eh0 Mqcko pkgrk gSA blfy,] og vk/kkj ftlij izkf/kdj.k us 2007 ds njeku esa ?kkV’kqYd esa ynkbZ

vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k O;; dh vuqefr nh Fkh] orZeku iz’kqYd pØ ds fy, vkt Hkh oS/k jgsaxsA

lhvksihVh esa ,lih,e ls igy

lhvksihVh esa ,lih,e ls igys vkSj ckn esa lhvksVh esa rsy FkzqiqV

s vkSj ckn esa lhvksVh esa rsy FkzqiqV

Ok”kZ

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

2012-13

FkzqiqV ,e,eVh esa

7.52

6.57

2.2

2.22

2.7

1.93

{kerk mi;ksx

100%

87%

29%

30%

36%

26%

lhvksVh ls vk; ¼#0 djksM+ksa esa½

65.68

58.39

19.21

26.07

24.9

31.39

23.5

(xxiii) LkhvksihVh ,lih,e dh ‘kq:vkr ds ckn ls Hkh lhvksVh esa 12-5 eh0 Mqcko cuk, gq, gS D;ksafd iRru daVsuj VfeZuy izpkyd] Mhih oYMZ] ds

lkFk gqbZ ykblsal djkj ds ek/;e ls lkafofnd :Ik ls ck/;dkjh Fkk fd daVsuj cFkksZa D;w 8 vkSj D;w 9 esa 12-5 eh0 Mqcko cuk, j[kk tk, tks

lhvksVh dh rjg ds leku {ks= eas FksA

(xxiv) lhvksVh esa 12-5 eh0 Mqcko dk rsy dEifu;ksa fo’ks”kr% chihlh,y }kjk ykHknk;d :Ik ls mi;ksx fd;k x;k gSA o”kZ 2012&13 esa VSadj cFkksZa

¼lhvksVh] ,uVhch rFkk ,lVhch½ esa 3-39 ,e,eVh ihvks,y ds la;qDr FkzqiqV esa ls] 1-31 ,e,eVh 9-14 eh0 ls vf/kd Mqcko ds lkFk iksrksa eas

fy;k x;k FkkA o”kZ 2011&12 esa rnuq:ih vkadM+k 4-32 ,e,eVh esa ls 2-59 ,e,eVh FkkA ekyHkkM+k ykHk ds ys[kk ij rsy dEifu;ksa dks ykHk]

3 MkWyj izfr eh-V- ekyHkkM+k ykHk dk vuqeku yxkrs gq,] o”kZ 2012&13 esa #0 19-65 djksM+ (1.31*3*50/MkWyj) vkSj o”kZ 2011&12 esa

#0 38-85 djksM+ (2.59*3*50/MkWyj) gksuk pkfg, FkkA fd rsy dEifu;ka] fo’ks”kr% chihlh,y] lhvksVh esa 12-5 eh0 ds Mqcko dh vis{kk

djrh gSa] mi;qZDr ls izekf.kr gksrk gSA chihlh,y lhvksihVh ls vuqjks/k djrk jgk gS fd lhvksVh esa 12-5 eh0 ds Mqcko dks cuk, j[kk tk,A

lhvksihVh ,slk djus ds fy, lger gS c’krsZ rsy dEifu;ka xgjs Mqcko ds fy, vfrfjDr ?kkV’kqYd vnk djsaA

(xxv) ;g fuosnu fd;k x;k gS fd lhvksihVh us lhvksVh ds mPprj Mqcko ds ,sls izko/kku ij dksbZ ykxr izHkkftr ugha dh Fkh] ;gka rd fd

chihlh,y vkSj vU; rsy dEifu;ksa us cM+s iklZy vkdkj okys iksr ykus ds fy, vkSj 2011 rd ifj.kkeh eku ferO;f;rk,a vftZr dh gSaA D;w

8 & D;w 9 cFkZ ij 12-5 eh0 Mqcko cuk, j[kus ds fy, lhvksihVh dh ck/;rk lekIr gks xbZ tc daVsuj VfeZuy izpkyu Qjojh] 2011 esa

vkbZlhVhVh] okykjikne esa LFkkukarfjr dj fn, x,A lhvksVh esa mPprj Mqcko cuk, j[kus ij dksbZ O;; vc lhvksVh esa ihvks,y izpkydksa

ij iwjh rjg ls vkjksI; gksrs gSaA

(xxvi) ;g ns[kk tk, fd lhvksihVh dk ekStwnk ewo fopkj ds ckn dqN ugha gSA D;w 8 & D;w 9 cFkksZa ij vkjthlhVh ls okykjikne ij vkbZlhVhVh

rd py jgs daVsuj izpkyuksa ds 3 lIrkg ds Hkhrj] lhvksihVh us 12-5 eh- ij lhvksVh esa Mqcko cuk, j[kus ds fy, visf{kr 2011&12 ds

fy, vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k O;; ds fy, #0 15 djksM+ vnk djus ds fy, chihlh,y dks dgk gS( ml le; dksbZ tokc ugha FkkA

(xxvii) Ok”kZ 2012&13 esa] iRru us lhvksVh esa 12-5 eh- Mqcko cuk, j[kus ds fy, fud”kZ.k vuqj{k.k ij dqy #0 123-92 djksM+ esa ls #0 46-33 djksM+

[kpZ fd, FksA tc vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr esa lqfopkfjr fd;k tkrk gS rks ;g Li”V gS fd iRru lhvksVh esa vius izpkyuksa ij uqdlku dj

jgk gSA

¹Hkkx IIIµ[k.M 4º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vlk/kj.k

(xxviii) lhvksVh esa FkzqiqV dk 87 izfr’kr chihlh,y ij vkjksI; gS] ijUrq os Hkh ogka ij U;wure FkzqiqV dh xkjaVh nsus dh ftEesnkjh ugha ysuk pkgrs gSaA

rFkkfi] bl rF; ls chihlh,y }kjk tkudkjh izrhr gksrh gS fd lhvksVh dk mi;ksx 2006&07 ds Lrjksa ls 26 izfr’kr fxjk gS] vkSj fd

VfeZuy ds fy, jktLo vUrj gS ftls iwjk fd, tkus dh vko’;drk gSA

(xxix) ijUrq chihlh,y Hkh iRru ls ;g pkgrk gS fd og lhvksVh dks izfr&lgkf;dh ds fy, ,lih,e izpkyuksa esa fdlh vf/k’ks”k dk mi;ksx djsA

lhvksihVh ds lkFk ,evks;w esa ‘krZ ds fy, chihlh,y fcUnq ftlesa ;g fn;k x;k gS fd ,d ckj ,lih,e ij FkzqiqV 9 ,e,eVh ij igqap tkrk

gS rks #0 25 izfr eh-V- ds ?kkV’kqYd esa v/kkseq[kh la’kks/ku ds fy, ckrphr djuh gksxhA ,lih,e ij 9 ,e,eVh FkzqiqV fcUnq 2012&13 esa

igyh ckj Hkax gqvk FkkA ¼o”kZ 2007&08 ls 2014&15 ds fy, lhvksihVh dh foRrh; fLFkfr ds lanHkZ esa] lhvksihVh us vius lkekU; la’kks/ku

izLrko ds 2007] 2010 vkSj 2013 ds iz’kqYd vkns’kksa ds izklafxd i`”Bksa ds lkj Hksts gSaA½

(xxx) ekeyksa dks dEikmaM djus ds fy,] la’kksf/kr ;krk;kr iwokZuqeku vkSj ifj.kkeh vk; vuqeku 2013 esa njeku ds fy, lkekU; la’kks/ku vkns’k esa

fo’okl fd, x, gSa tks ldy vfr&vuqekuksa gks tk,axsA vokLrfod :Ik ls mPp ;krk;kr vuqekuksa ls iz’kqYd de gksxk vkSj ykxrksa dh de

olwyh ls vkf[kjdkj foRrh; vfLFkjrk gksxh( blfy, ekuuh; izkf/kdj.k ls ;g vuqjks/k fd;k x;k gS fd okLrfod ;krk;kr MkVk ds vk/kkj

ij iz’kqYdksa ij iqu% dk;Z fd;k tk,A iRru us ihvks,y ds ;krk;kr iwokZuqeku ds laca/k esa fuEufyf[kr fuosnu fd, gSa%&

(d)

iRru us ‘kq: esa ¼twu 2012 esa½ o”kZ 2012&13] 2013&14 vkSj 2014&15 ds fy, 14 ,e,eVh ds dPps rsy rFkk FkzqiqV dk vuqeku

yxk;k Fkk ftlesa ls 9-5 ,e,eVh ,lih,e ij izgfLrr fd, tkus ds fy, vuqekfur fd;k x;k Fkk vkSj 4-5 ,e,eVh cFkksZa ijA

([k)

pwafd ,lih,e rFkk xksfn;ksa esa FkzqiqV dk vuqikr Øe’k% 68 izfr’kr vkSj 32 izfr’kr ifjxf.kr gqvk gS] blfy, vk; ds vuqekuu

ds iz;kstu ds fy, ,lih,e rFkk cFkksZa ij vuqekfur ihvks,y ;krk;kr dh fgLlsnkjh fu/kkZfjr djus ds fy, o”kZ 2012&13 ls

2014&15 gsrq Øe’k% 14-40] 16-00 rFkk 17-23 ,e,eVh ij dksphu iRru }kjk ¼vxLr 2012 esa½ izsf”kr la’kksf/kr ihvks,y ;krk;kr

vuqekuksa ij Vh,,eih }kjk ;g vuqikr ykxw fd;k x;k FkkA rnuqlkj] vk; vuqeku fu/kkZfjr djus ds fy, izkf/kdj.k }kjk

lqfopkfjr la’kksf/kr ;krk;kr vuqeku fuEuor~ gSa%&

Ok”kZ

;krk;kr vuqeku ¼,e,eVh esa½

vk; vuqeku ¼yk[kksa esa½

,lih,e

(68%)

vU; cFkZ

vU; cFkZ (32%)

dqy ;krk;kr vuqeku

,lih,e

vU; cFkZ

dqy

2012-13

9.79

4.61

14.40

2448.00

2995.20

5443.20

2013-14

10.88

5.12

16.00

2720.00

3328.00

6048.00

2014-15

11.72

5.51

17.23

2929.10

3583.84

6512.94

(xxxi) (d)

o”kZ 2012&13 ls 2014&15 ds fy, Øe’k% 4-61] 5-12 rFkk 5-51 ,e,eVh ij cFkksZa ij FkzqiqV esa ifj.kkeh vuqikr dk vaxhdj.kA

mi;qZDr o”kksZa ds fy, ,lih,e ij rnuq:ih ;krk;kr Øe’k% 9-79] 10-88 rFkk 11-72 ,e,eVh gks x;k FkkA ;g fuosnu fd;k

x;k gS fd ,lih,e ij dPpk rsy vk;kr fdlh egRoiw.kZ rjhds ls 9-5 ,e,eVhih, dh ekStwnk fjQkbfuax {kerk dks ikj ugha

dj ldrk tcrd fd chihlh,y dh dksfPp fjQkbujh 2016&17 esa laHkkfor viuh fjQkbfuax {kerk dk foLrkj ugha djrk gSA

;g ekeyk cFkksZa ij ihvks,y izgLru ds fy, ds Hkh fHkUu ugha gS] pwafd ihvks,y vf/kd ;k de dsifVo gS] rsy dEifu;ksa fo’ks”kr%

chihlh,y }kjk iw.kZr% fu;af=rA

([k)

rFkkfi] dksphu iRru U;kl }kjk la’kkksf/kr ;krk;kr iwokZuqekuksa ds ihNs dkj.k eYVh&;wtj fyfDoM VfeZuy ¼,e;w,yVh½ vkSj

,yihth VfeZuy tSlh dqN ifj;kstuk,a ‘kq: gksus dh mEehn Fkh] nksuksa iwjs ugha gq, Fks tSlk iapo”khZ; ;kstuk esa vuqeku yxk;k

x;k FkkA okLro esa] ,e;w,yVh rFkk ,yihth VfeZuy vkbZvkslh,y ds fy, ukekadu ds v/khu ihihih ifj;kstuk ds ek/;e ls

vc la;qDr fd, tk jgs gSa] vkSj ekStwnk iz’kqYd pØ dh lekfIr ij gh ‘kq: gksus dh mEehn gSA

(x)

okLro esa] 2012&13 esa dksphu iRru esa ihvks,y dk izkIr fd;k x;k FkzqiqV dsoy 13-90 ,e,eVh jgk gS ftlesa ls ,lih,e

10-06 ,e,eVh ys[kkafdr fd;k x;k gSA ekStwnk o”kZ 2013&14 ¼vizSy&tqykbZ½ ds fy,] ihvks,y FkzqiqV 4-92 ,e,eVh gS ftlesa ls

,lih,e fgLlsnkjh 3-45 ,e,eVh gSA ,lih,e rFkk cFkksZa ij la;qDr vk; vuqeku bl izdkj o”kZ 2012&13] 2013&14 rFkk

2014&15 ds fy, Øe’k% #0 54-43] 60-48 vkSj 65-13 djksM+ gks x;k gS tcfd blds foijhr lHkh mi;qZDr o”kksZa ds fy, izkjafHkd

vuqeku #0 53 djksM+ izfro”kZ FkkA ;g fuosnu fd;k x;k gS fd 2012&13 ds fy, ihvks,y ?kkV’kqYd vk; ,lih,e rFkk xksfn;ksa

nksuksa ij fopkj djrs gq, dsoy #0 48-01 djksM+ gks tk,xkA

(xxxii) ,lih,e rFkk vU; cFkksZa ij vius izkjafHkd lkekU; la’kks/ku izLrko esa lhvksihVh }kjk vuqekfur ihvks,y dkxksZ dk vuqikr 68 izfr’kr vkSj

32 izfr’kr ds vuqikr esa FkkA Vh,,eih us vxLr 2012 esa iRru }kjk izsf”kr ihvks,y ds la’kksf/kr dkxksZ vuqekuksa ij ;gh vuqikr ykxw fd;k

Fkk vkSj ,lih,e rFkk vU; cFkksZa esa dkxksZ vuqeku ij ckaVk FkkA

(xxxiii) ;g fuosnu fd;k x;k gS fd mi;qZDr n`f”Vdks.k dk vko’;d fgLlk iRruksa dks mudh lsokvksa ds fy, nj ^;krk;kr D;k ogu dj ldrk gS^

ds fy, vuqefr nsuk gksxkA loksZPp ysfVV;wM dk foLrkj djrs gq, gh lhvksihVh tSlk iRru viuh ekStwnk fLFkfr esa] Hkkjh vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k

O;; }kjk de vkadk tk,xk vkSj Hkkjr ljdkj ls fdlh lgkf;dh vFkok ctVh; leFkZu ds ykHk fcuk foRrh; O;ogk;Zrk dk dqN lsecysal

ikuk laHko gksxkA

(xxxiv) tc lhvksihVh esa vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k O;; dh olwyh ds czaV dks ogu djus ds ys[kk ij fcYdqy vf/kd ohvkjlh igys ls gS vkSj fd ohvkjlh

esa vkSj o`f);ka vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k O;; esa o`f) djus dh olwyh ds fy, lk/; ugha gSa] geus Hkh ;g n’kkZ;k gS fd ;krk;kr ihvks,y ds fy,

mPprj ?kkV’kqYd ogu djus ds fy, bPNqd gS] izkf/kdj.k dks blds fy, vokMZ tkjh djuk pkfg, D;ksafd iRru tSls ,Uuksj rFkk dkdhukMk

1996 esa lhvksihVh ds ekeys esa fu/kkZfjr fd, x, #0 65 izfr ,eVh dh rqyuk esa Øe’k% #0 100 izfr eh-V- rFkk #0 134 izfr eh-V- olwy

fd;k tk jgk gSA

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY

[PART III—SEC. 4]

(xxxv) izkf/kdj.k ls vuqjks/k fd;k x;k gS fd lhvksVh esa 12-5 eh0 Mqcko ds fy, t:jh vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k O;; dk iwjh rjg ls cks> Mkyrs gq,

ihvks,y ds fy, ?kkV’kqYd ij fopkj djs tSlk chihlh,y us bPNk O;Dr dh FkhA U;w easxywj iRru ds ekeys esa ekuuh; izkf/kdj.k }kjk ,sls

n`f”Vdks.k dks fy;k x;k gS] tSlk blus 2007 ds vkns’k esa ik;k FkkA

(xxxvi) tcfd ;g Li”V gS fd izHkkj ykxr tEkk izfrykHk n`f”Vdks.k ij fu/kkZfjr fd, x, gSa tSlk 2005 fn’kkfunsZ’kksa eas vis{kk dh xbZ gS] of/kZr

Mqcko vFkkZr~ ,lVhch rFkk ,uVhch tks 9-14 eh0 Mqcko ij izpkyu tkjh j[ks gq, gSa] ds ek/;e ls egRoiw.kZ <ax ls of/kZr lqfo/kk,a izkIr ugha

djus okys dkxksZ ds fy, ,dleku iz’kqYd igyh ckj esa lgh ugha fn[kkbZ nsxkA ijUrq lHkh vkarfjd VSadj cFkksZa ij ihvks,y ds fy, ,dleku

?kkV’kqYd dh vuq’kalk dh xbZ gS D;ksafd rsy dEifu;ka yxkrkj de Mqcko okys VfeZuy ij ynkbZ ds fy, iksr ysrh jgrh gS vkSj mPprj

Mqcko lhvksVh ij VkWi vi djrh gSaA lhvksihVh ds ihvks,y FkzqiqV esa bldh dksfPp fjQkbujh ds ys[kk ij chihlh,y dk fizMksfeusal] tks

VSadj cFkksZa ds ek/;e ls fjQkbu fd, x, mRiknksa ds lapyu ds fy, O;oLFkkvksa rFkk ,lih,e ds ek/;e ls dPps rsy dk vk;kr djrk gS]

lHkh vkarfjd VSadj cFkksZa ij ihvks,y ds fy, ,dleku ?kkV’kqYd izLrkfor djus ds fy, nwljk dkj.k gSA

(xxxvii) lhvksihVh us 18&2&2011] og rkjh[k tc ls daVsuj izgLru xfrfof/k;ka fofyaXMu vkbySaM ls okykjikne esa fuokZflr gqbZ Fkh] ls ?kkV’kqYd

dh bl nj ds iwoZO;kih fu/kkZj.k ds fy, Hkh izkFkZuk dh gS] bl izdkj ml {ks= esa 12-5 eh- ij Mqcko cuk, j[kus ds fy, iRru dh t:jr

lekIr gks jgh gSA ,slk djrs gq,] izkf/kdj.k dks ;g ;kn fnyk;k tkrk gS fd chihlh,y #0 65 izfr eh-V- ?kkV’kqYd tks lhvksVh esa 9-14

eh0 Mqcko cuk, j[kus ds lhvksihVh ij vf/kjksfir ck/;rk ls vf/kd ,d Hkh #i;k vnk fd, fcuk 2006 ls 2011 rd 12-5 eh0 Mqcko dk

fu%’kqYd ykHk mBkrk jgsxkA

(xxxviii) lhvksihVh bl ekeys esa chihlh,y dh laosnu’khyrkvksa ls ifjfpr gS] fd ,lih,e ij iRru }kjk fd, x, dksbZ vf/k’ks”k lhvksVh ij xgjs

Mqcko ds vuqj{k.k dh izfr&lgkf;dh ds fy, vo’; bLrseky fd, tkus pkfg,A blfy,] ,lih,e ij vf/k’ks”kksa ds fy, miyC/k djokus ds

ckn dPps rsy rFkk ihvks,y izpkyu esa dsoy fuoy jktLo vUrj dks lhvksVh ds fy, vko’;d vfrfjDr ?kkV’kqYd dh x.kuk esa fy;k x;k

gSA

(xxxix) Xk.kuk,a n’kkZrh gSa fd lhvksVh esa xgjs Mqcko ds fy, vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k O;; ds fy, 2011&12 esa #0 15 djksM+ ds Hkqxrku ds fy, iRru ds

vuqjks/k ds ckotwn] lhvksihVh ml o”kZ ds fy, vfrfjDr ?kkV’kqYd ds fy, gdnkj ugha gS tc ,lih,e ls vf/k’ks”k ij fopkj fd;k x;k gSA

rFkkfi] lhvksihVh }kjk ml o”kZ ds fy, vf/k’ks”k jktLo dh dksbZ okilh vFkok lek;kstu dh ekax ugha dh xbZ gS D;ksafd ,lih,e ij 9

,e,eVh dk FkzqiqV tks #0 25 izfr eh-V- dk ?kkV’kqYd fofufnZ”V djrk gS] ml o”kZ esa Hkax ugha fd;k x;k FkkA

(xL)

mi;qZDr fuosnu ds vk/kkj ij] blus 18 Qjojh 2011 vFkkZr~ ,lih,e ls ?kkV’kqYd ds lek;kstu ds ckn o”kZ 2012&13 ds fy, #0 45-90

ih,eVh] 2013&14 ds fy, #0 52-60 ih,eVh vkSj 2014&15 ds fy, #0 84-78 ih,eVh ds okykjikne esa fofyaXMu vkbySaM ls fuokZflr

daVsuj izgLru xfrfof/k;ksa dh rkjh[k ls iwoZO;kih izHkko ls ihvks,y ij vfrfjDr ?kkV’kqYd vuqeksfnr djus dk vuqjks/k fd;k gSA bl izdkj]

o”kZ 2012&13 ls 2014&15 ds fy, vuqeksnu gsrq vuqjks/k fd;k x;k dqy ?kkV’kqYd Øe’k% #0 110-90 ih,eVh] #0 117-60 ih,eVh vkSj #0

149-78 ih,eVh gSA ihvks,y izgLru ds fy, lhvksihVh }kjk izsf”kr ykxr fooj.k dk lkj uhps fn;k x;k gS%&

(#0 yk[kkas esa)

fooj.k

okLrfod

vuqeku

2011-12

2012-13

2013-14

2014-15

Ykkxr

3979.09

5811.74

6224.49

7117.32

vkjvkslhbZ

222.51

319.41

266.34

500.02

dqy ykxr

4201.60

6131.156

6490.83

7617.34

nj izfr Vu #0 esa

97.26

180.86

185.45

217.64

?kVk;k% ekStwnk ?kkV’kqYd #0 esa

65.00

vfrfjDr ?kkV’kqYd

32.26

115.86

120.45

152.64

fuoy vf/k’ks”k@?kkVk

-1399.60

-3931.15

-4215.83

-5342.34

,lih,e&?kkV’kqYd

2229.10

2375.00

,lih,e ?kkV’kqYd ij fopkj djus ds ckn fuoy jktLo vUrj

829.50

-1556.15

-1840.83

-2967.34

vfrfjDr ?kkV’kqYd ¼#0 izfr Vu½

-19.20

45.90

52.60

84.78

(xLi) ?kkV’kqYd ds iwoZO;kih fu/kkZj.k ls rsy dEifu;ksa ls olwyh esa dksbZ Hkze vFkok buljekmaVscy eqf’dysa ugha gksaxh] D;ksafd vkarfjd VSadj cFkZ

ml lhek rd rsy dEifu;ksa }kjk yxHkx iw.kZ :Ik ls iSVuZlkbt fd, x, gSa] iRru ds fy, ,ethVh ds ykHk ds fcuk ,yfcVA

(xLii) lhvksihVh us bl izkf/kdj.k ls mi;qZDr vkns’k ‘kh?kz tkjh djus dh izkFkZuk dh gS] rkfd iRru rsy dEifu;ksa dks og Mqcko miyC/k djok ldsa

tks os VfeZuy esa vis{kk djsa] fcuk dksbZ uqdlku mBk,] vkSj jk”Vªh; fgr ,d&nwljs esa mRre ykus ds fy, iRru vkSj iRru mi;ksDrkvksa nksuksa

}kjk lcljo fd;k x;k gksA

(xLiii) (d)

ihvks,y ds fy, #0 65 ih,eVh ds ekStwnk ?kkV’kqYd esa o`f) djus dk izLrko fd;k x;k gS tksfd fuEuor~ gS%&

Ok”kZ

2011-12

2012-13

2013-14

2014-15

ihvks,y izgLru xfrfof/k ds fy, izLrkfor la’kksf/kr ?kkV’kqYd

¼izfr eh-V-½

45.80

(izLrkfor

dVkSrh)

110.90

117.60

149.78

¹Hkkx IIIµ[k.M 4º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vlk/kj.k

([k)

lhvksihVh us 18 Qjojh 2011 vFkkZr~ og rkjh[k tc daVsuj izgLru xfrfof/k;ka okykjikne esa fuokZflr dh xbZ Fkha ls iwoZO;kih

izHkko ls o`f) fd, tkus dk izLrko fd;k x;k gSA

izLrko dks Lohdkj djrs le;] lhvksihVh ls gekjs i= fnukad 4 flrEcj 2013 }kjk vuqjks/k fd;k x;k Fkk fd 13 flrEcj 2013 ls igys dqN fcUnqvksa

ij lwpuk Hksts] tks izLrko dh izkjafHkd laoh{kk ij ns[kh xbZ FkhA lhvksihVh us vius i= fnukad 9 flrEcj 2013 }kjk viuk tokc Hkstk FkkA gekjs }kjk ekaxh xbZ

lwpuk vkSj mlij lhvksihVh }kjk izsf”kr tokc uhps rkfydkc) fd, x, gSa%&

Ø-lalalala-

gekjs }kjk ekaxh xbZ lwpuk

lhvksihVh }kjk izsf”kr tokc

(i)

fiNys vkns’k esa ihvks,y xfrfof/k ds fy,

lhvksihVh }kjk vuqekfur vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k

ykxr o”kZ 2012&13 esa #0 1570-96 yk[k]

o”kZ 2013&14 esa #0 1629-46 yk[k vkSj

2014&15 esa #0 1722-24 yk[k FkhA blds

foijhr fd lhvksihVh us vc ekStwnk izLrko

esa 2012&13 esa #0 4633-00 yk[k] 2013&14

esa #0 4937-00 yk[k vkSj o”kZ 2014&15 esa

#0 5633-00 yk[k dh vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k

ykxr dk vuqeku yxk;k gSA ihvks,y ds

fy, vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr ds vuqekuu esa

la’kks/ku ds dkj.k@vk/kkj vuqekuu ds

of/kZr Lrj ds fy, vkSfpR; ds lkFk HkstsaA

tSlkfd izLrko esa mYys[k fd;k x;k gS] iRru us vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ij Hkkjh O;; fd;k gS tc

vU; egkiRruksa ls rqyuk dh tkrh gSA iRru Hkkjr ljdkj ls fuf/k izkIr ugha dj jgk gSA

blfy,] ;g jkf’k iRru }kjk iz’kqYd ds ek/;e ls olwy dh tkuh gSA

rsy ih,l;w lhvksVh esa 12-5 ehVj Mqcko dks cuk, j[kus ij tksj ns jgs gSa rkfd os cM+s iksr

yk ldsa vkSj ifjogu esa eku dh ferO;;rk izkIr djus ds fy, cM+s iklZy yk ldsaA

tc iRru us 2011 esa fiNys lkekU; iz’kqYd la’kks/ku ds y, izLrko tek fd;k Fkk rks iRru

us lhvksVh esa 12-5 ehVj Mqcko cuk, j[kus ds fy, fud”kZ.k ykxr ds fgLls ds :Ik esa o”kZ

2012&13] 2013&14 vkSj 2014&15 ds fy, Øe’k% #0 1570-96 yk[k] #0 1629-46 yk[k vkSj

#0 1722-24 yk[k vkcafVr fd, FksA rFkkfi] ;g ykxr 2 fefy;u ?ku ehVj dh ek=k izkIr

djus ds fy, gh yh xbZ Fkh tks M;wQsfju IokbaV ls lhvksVh rd pSuy ds fy, FkhA

mlds ckn] vkarfjd ppkZvksa esa ;g crk;k x;k Fkk fd lhvksVh esa 12-5 ehVj Mqcko lqfuf’pr

djus ds fy, vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k O;; izHkkftr djus dh lgh i)fr lhvksVh rd vkarfjd

pSuy ds ek/;e ls ckg~; igqap pSuy ls gVk, tkus okys flYV dh lao/kZukRed ek=k ij

fopkj djus ds fy, gksxk] vkSj ;g ns[kk x;k gS fd bl laca/k esa vfrfjDr :Ik ls gVk, x,

flYV dh ek=k 6-9 fefy;u ?ku eh- ¼ckg~; rFkk vkarfjd pSuyksa ds fy, 3-8 fefy;u ?ku

ehVj vkSj 3-1 fefy;u ?ku ehVj½ gks tkrk gSA Mªsftax dkiksZjs’ku vkWQ bafM;k fyfeVsM ds

lkFk ekStwnk djkj esa ‘krksZa ds vk/kkj ij] vkjksI; ykxr 2012&13 ds fy, #0 46-33 djksM+]

2013&14 ds fy, #0 49-37 djksM+ vkSj blh rjg 2014&15 ds fy, #0 56-33 djksM+

ifjxf.kr fd;k x;k gSA

(ii)

lhvksihVh ds ekStwnk izLrko dk bl

izkf/kdj.k

}kjk

vkns’k

la-

Vh,,eih@49@2011&lhvksihVh fnukad 1

vizSy 2013 }kjk vuqeksfnr fiNys iz’kqYd

la’kks/ku esa lqfopkfjr dkxksZ lacaf/kr

xfrfof/k;ksa vkSj iksr lacaf/kr xfrfof/k;ksa ds

ykxr fooj.kksa ,oa iRru dh lexz ykxr

fLFkfr ij Hkh izHkko iM+sxkA lhvksihVh us

dsoy ihvks,y xfrfof/k ds fy, ykxr

fooj.k Hkstk gSA blfy,] lhvksihVh ls

vuqjks/k gS fd o”kZ 2012&13] 2013&14 vkSj

2014&15 ds fy, fu/kkZfjr izk:iksa esa lexz

iRru ds fy, lesfdr ykxr fooj.k ds

lkFk dkxksZ lacaf/kr rFkk iksr lacaf/kr

xfrfof/k&okj ykxr fooj.k HkstsA

iRru us iquxZ.kuk dh gS vkSj 2012&13 ls 2013&14 vof/k ds fy, lesfdr ykxr fooj.k

vkSj dkxksZ] iksr lacaf/kr] laink xfrfof/k gsrq xfrfof/k&okj ykxr fooj.k Hksts gSaA iRru us

dkxksZ rFkk iksr lacaf/kr xfrfof/k;ksa ds v/khu mi&xfrfof/k&okj ykxr fooj.k Hkh Hksts gSaA

(iii)

d`Ik;k foLr`r x.kukvksa ds lkFk ?kkV’kqYd

izHkkjksa esa izLrkfor o`f) dh otg ls laHkkfor

o”kZokj izksn~Hkwr vfrfjDr jktLo HkstsaA

?kkV’kqYd izHkkjksa esa izLrkfor o`f) dh otg ls iRru dks laHkkfor izksn~Hkwr vuqekfur vfrfjDr

jktLo fuEuor~ Hkstk x;k gS%&

Ø-

lalalala-

fooj.k

2012-13

(okLrfod

okLrfod

okLrfod)

2013-14

(iwokZuqeku

iwokZuqeku

iwokZuqeku)

2014-15

(iwokZuqeku

iwokZuqeku

iwokZuqeku)

ihvks,y dkxksZ ;krk;kr

¼fefy;u eh-V-½

3.39

3.50

vfrfjDr ?kkV’kqYd nj

¼#0 izfr Vu½

45.90

52.60

84.78

?kkV’kqYd ls vfrfjDr

jktLo ¼#0 djksM+ksa esa½

15.56

18.41

29.67

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY

[PART III—SEC. 4]

lhvksihVh us foLr`r ykxr fooj.k Hkstk gSA ;g uksV fd;k tk, fd izLrkfor vfrfjDr

?kkV’kqYd ,lih,e ij ?kkV’kqYd jktLo ij fopkj djus ds ckn fu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k gSA

;g uksV fd;k tk, fd 2013&14 vkSj 2014&15 ds fy, ;krk;kr iwokZuqeku ladsrkRed gSa

vkSj gky gh ds o”kksZa esa iRru esa izgfLrr ihvks,y dh ek=k esa mrkj&p<+ko ns[ks x, gSa

tSlkfd uhps rkfydk esa n’kkZ;k x;k gS%&

(fefy;u ehfVªd Vuksa esa

fefy;u ehfVªd Vuksa esa

fefy;u ehfVªd Vuksa esa)

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

2012-13

3.40

3.84

3.67

4.32

3.39

rsy ih,l;w VSadj cFkksZa ds ek/;e ls iRru dks fdlh lqfuf’pr ek=k dk oknk ugha dj jgs gSaA

blfy,] vfrfjDr ?kkV’kqYd nj ds ek/;e ls vuqekfur lao/kZukRed jktLo mi;ksDrkvksa }kjk

yk, x, ihvks,y ds ek=k esa vkxs [kkfjt dh fLFkfr esa vftZr ugha fd;k tk ldrkA bl

rF; ij fopkj djrs gq,] Vh,,eih rsy ih,l;w dks mi;qDr funs’k tkjh djs fd ihvks,y

mRiknksa ds lkis{k iwokZuqekuksa ds izgLru esa deh] ;fn dksbZ gks] dh fLFkfr esa Ik;kZIr :i ls

iRru dks {kfriwfrZ djsA

Vh,,eih iRru ds izLrko ij vius fu.kZ; dks vafre :Ik nsrs le; fuEufyf[kr fcUnqvksa ij

fopkj djs%

(d). pwafd foRrh; o”kZ 2012&13 igys gh iwjk gks pqdk gS vkSj vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ij iRru us

#0 123-92 djksM+ [kpZ fd, gSa] blfy, mi;ksDrk ¼rsy ih,l;w½ ftUgksaus mPprj Mqcko vkSj

ifjogu dh ferO;;rkvksa ds ykHk mBk, gSa] ,deq’r jkf’k dk Hkqxrku djrs gq, iRru }kjk

[kpZ dh xbZ vfrfjDr ykxr dks fMÝs djuk pkfg,A

([k). foRrh; o”kZ 2013&14 dk izFke vk/kk o”kZ yxHkx lekIr gksus okyk gS] vfrfjDr

?kkV’kqYd nj 1&4&2013 ls ykxw fd;k tkuk pkfg, rkfd iRru lhvksVh esa 12-5 eh- Mqcko

dks cuk, j[kus ds fy, vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ij vfrfjDr O;; [kpZ ds fy, {kfriwfrZ dh xbZ gSA

5.1.

fu/kkZfjr ijke’khZ izfØ;k ds vuqlkj] lhvksihVh izLrko fnukad 19 vxLr 2013 lac) mi;ksDrkvksa@mi;ksDrk laxBuksa dks mudh fVIif.k;ksa ds fy, vxzsf”kr

fd;k x;k FkkA

5.2.

pawfd lhvksihVh }kjk vius i= fnukad 9 flrEcj 2013 }kjk nkf[ky fd, x, xfrfof/k&okj@mi&xfrfof/k&okj lesfdr ykxr fooj.k fo”k; izLrko ij

dk;Zokgh djus ds fy, izklafxd gSa] lhvksihVh ds i= fnukad 9 flrEcj 2013 dh izfr Hkh chihlh,y lfgr lac) mi;ksDrkvksa@mi;ksDrk laxBuksa dks vxzsf”kr dh xbZ

FkhA lhvksihVh dh lykg ij] ;g izLrko vU; rsy ih,l;w vFkkZr~ ,pihlh,y vkSj vkbZvkslh,y dks muds fVIif.k;ksa ds fy, vxzsf”kr fd;k x;k FkkA

5.3.

Hkkjr isVªksfy;e dkiksZjs’ku fyfeVsM ¼chihlh,y½ ls izkIr fVIif.k;ka lhvksihVh dks izfriqf”Vlwpuk :Ik esa Hksth xbZ FkhaA lhvksihVh us vius i= fnukad 30

flrEcj 2013 }kjk chihlh,y dh fVIif.k;ksa dk izR;qRrj fn;k FkkA

5.4.

Hkkjrh; jk”Vªh; iksrLokeh ,lksfl,’ku ¼vkbZ,u,l,½ ls izkIr gqbZ fVIif.k;ka lhvksihVh dks vxzsf”kr dh xbZ FkhaA gesa bl ekeys dks vafre :Ik fn, tkus

rd vkbZ,u,l, dh fVIif.k;ksa ij lhvksihVh ls dksbZ izfriqf”V izkIr ugha gqbZ FkhA

iksr ifjogu ea=ky; ¼,evks,l½ us lhvksihVh ds yafcr iz’kqYd ekeyksa ij ppkZ djus ds fy, vius i= la- 8¼13½@2013&Vh,,eih fnukad 4 vDrwcj

2013 }kjk ubZ fnYyh esa 8 vDrwcj 2013 dks ,d cSBd vk;ksftr dh FkhA iz’kqYd ekeyksa esa ls ,d ekeyk blds ekStwnk njeku esa fu/kkZfjr ihvks,y mRiknksa ij

?kkV’kqYd izHkkjksa dh leh{kk ds fy, lhvksihVh ls izkIr izLrko FkkA mDr cSBd ds dk;Zo`Rr gesa izkIr ugha gq, gSaA cSBd ds nkSjku fuEufyf[kr fcUnq mBk, x, Fks%&

(i)

lhvksihVh }kjk mBk, x, fcUnq ds laca/k esa fd bl izkf/kdj.k }kjk fiNys vkns’k esa lqfopkfjr ;krk;kr vokLrfod :Ik ls vf/kd gS vkSj iwjk

ugha fd;k tk,xk] iz’kqYd vkns’k ds izklafxd vuqPNsn dks m)fjr djrs gq, Li”V fd;k x;k Fkk fd bl izkf/kdj.k us o”kZ 2012&13 ls

2014&15 ds fy, iRru dh ykxr fLFkfr ij igqapus ds fy, iRru }kjk ;Fkk izsf”kr ;krk;kr vuqekuksa ij fo’okl vkSj fopkj fd;k gSA

(ii)

lhvksihVh dks ;g crk;k x;k Fkk fd vc izsf”kr ykxr fooj.kksa esa iRru us gky gh ds iz’kqYd vkns’k fnukad 1 vizSy 2013 vkSj 10 twu

2013 dks vf/klwfpr esa bl izkf/kdj.k }kjk lqfopkfjr vuqekuksa ds lanHkZ esa ;krk;kr] vk; vkSj vf/kdka’k vuqeku la’kksf/kr fd, gSaA pwafd

iRru }kjk izeq[krk ls mBk, x, ekStwnk izLrko esa eq[; eqn~nk gS fd ihvks,y xfrfof/k ls lacaf/kr vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k Vh,,eih vkns’k esa

ohvkjlh ds fy, fd, x, vkcaVu dh ctk; ihvks,y izgLru xfrfof/k ds ykxr fooj.k esa lqfopkfjr fd;k tkuk pkfg,] iRru dks ;g

lq>ko fn;k x;k Fkk fd vizSy 2013 vkns’k esa ihvks,y xfrfof/k ds fy, vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr ds vkcaVu ls lacaf/kr la’kks/ku ds flok;]

bl izkf/kdj.k }kjk ;Fkk lqfopkfjr vuqekuksa dks cuk, j[kk tk,A lhvksihVh cSBd esa fn, x, lq>ko dh tkap djus ds fy, lger FkkA

(iii)

tSlkfd Åij crk;k x;k gS] lhvksihVh us vizSy 2013 ds iz’kqYd vkns’k esa lqfopkfjr vuqekuksa dks la’kksf/kr fd;k gSA pawfd lhvksihVh }kjk

nkf[ky fd, x, la’kksf/kr ykxr fooj.kksa dh dk;Zokgh esa fopkj.kh; le; ‘kkfey gksxk vkSj lhvksihVh }kjk vfHkO;Dr ,Dlhtsalh ds

en~nsutj vkSj ;fn lhvksihVh vizSy 2013 esa bl izkf/kdj.k }kjk ;Fkk lqfopkfjr vuqekuksa dks cuk, j[kus ds fy, lgefr ugha nsrk gS rks

izdV fcUnq fd D;k vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k O;;ksa dks doj djus ds fy, nj izklafxd mi;ksDrkvksa dh lgefr ls rnFkZ vk/kkj ij vuqeksfnr fd;k

tk ldrk gSA rFkkfi] lhvksihVh us ihvks,y mRiknksa ds fy, ?kkV’kqYd dh izLrkfor vfrfjDr nj ds fy, izklafxd mi;ksDrkvksa dh lgefr

Hkstus esa viuh vleFkZrk O;Dr dh gSA

¹Hkkx IIIµ[k.M 4º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vlk/kj.k

7.1.

,evks,l }kjk 8 vDrwcj 2013 dks vk;ksftr dh xbZ cSBd ds ckn] lhvksihVh us vius i= fnukad 8 vDrwcj 2013 }kjk rnFkZ vk/kkj ij ihvks,y dh

?kkV’kqYd nj esa izLrkfor o`f) vuqeksfnr djus dh ekax dh FkhA bl laca/k esa lhvksihVh }kjk fd, x, eq[; fuosnu uhps fn, x, gSa%&

(i)

lhvksihVh izLrko fnukad 19 vxLr 2013 chihlh,y rFkk vU; rsy dEifu;ksa ds lkFk ppkZvksa ds vk/kkj ij tek fd;k x;k Fkk vkSj iRru

ds fy, fcuk dealjsV vk; ds lhvksVh esa vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ds fy, iRru }kjk fd, x, Hkkjh O;; dks iwjk djus ds fy, rkRdkfydrk ds

en~nsutj tek fd;k x;k FkkA

(ii)

(d)

bl izkf/kdj.k us iRru dks 2013 esa tkjh fd, x, iz’kqYd la’kks/ku vkns’k esa bl izkf/kdj.k }kjk ;Fkk la’kksf/kr ;krk;kr] vk;

rFkk O;; ds vkadM+ksa dks cuk, j[krs gq, ihvks,y xfrfof/k ds v/khu fud”kZ.k ykxrksa dks ‘kkfey djus ds ckn la’kksf/kr ykxr

fooj.k tek djus dk lq>ko fn;k FkkA

([k)

rFkkfi] ;Fkk iwokZuqekfur vk;] tks iapo”khZ; ;kstuk@okf”kZd ;kstuk ds fy, iwokZuqekfur ;krk;kr ds vkadM+ksa ij vk/kkfjr Fkh]

,y,uth VfeZuy] ,e;w,yVh] ekMuZ dksy VfeZuy vkSj cYd lhesaV VfeZuy tSlh izeq[k ifj;kstukvksa ds ‘kq: gksus esa foyac dh

otg ls iwjh ugha gks ik,xhA

(x)

dPps rsy rFkk ihvks,y ds ekeys esa] fo’ks”k :Ik ls ,e;w,yVh ds ‘kq: gksus esa foyac us lHkh x.kukvksa dks vilsV fd;k gSA

blfy,] vkadM+ksa ij vk/kkfjr vk; iwokZuqeku iwjs ugha fd, tk ldsaxsA

(?k)

osruksa rFkk etnwjh esa la’kks/ku vkSj lhvksVh esa mrjkbZ miLdj ds laLFkkiu dh otg ls ewY;gzkl esa O;; vkadM+ksa esa cnyko gq,

gSaA

(³)

lHkh izklafxd eqn~nksa ij fopkj djrs gq,] lhvksihVh ihvks,y ds fy, ?kkV’kqYd nj gsrq izkFkZuk djrk gS tksfd fuEuor~ gS%&

2013-14

2014-15

ekStwnk ?kkV’kqYd ¼#0 izfr eh-V-½

65.00

vfrfjDr ?kkV’kqYd ¼#0 izfr eh-V-½

45.90

52.60

84.78

dqy

110.90

117.60

149.78

(iii)

njeku esa Vh,,eih }kjk igys ls vuqeksfnr vk; rFkk O;;ksa esa cnyko djus ds fy, izLrko dh tkap djus esa T;knk le; yx ldrk gSA

iRru dh xaHkhj fuf/k fLFkfr ij fopkj djrs gq,] ?kkV’kqYd dh la’kksf/kr nj vf/klwfpr djus esa vkSj foyac ls iRru U;kl dks uqdlku

gksxkA

(iv)

iRru fiNys dbZ eghuksa ds nkSjku Hkkjh foRrh; ladV ls xqtj jgk gSA iRru bl fLFkfr esa ugha gS fd vDrwcj 2013 ekg ds fy, osru rFkk

isa’ku laforfjr dj lds vkSj dbZ vU; lkafofnd Hkqxrku gSa tks fuf/k;ksa dh deh dh otg ls yafcr j[ks x, gSaA

(v)

pwafd ?kkV’kqYd ij leh{kk izLrko fopkjk/khu jgk gS] iRru lhvksVh esa xgjs Mqcko okys iksrksa dks O;ofLFkr djuk tkjh j[ks gq, gaSA la’kksf/kr

nj dks vafre :Ik ugha fn, tkus dh otg ls iRru dks uqdlku gks jgk gSA

7.2.

mi;qZDr fLFkfr ds en~nsutj] iRru us rnFkZ vk/kkj ij rRdky izHkko ls ¼o”kZ 2013&14½ ds fy, #0 117-60 ds izLrkfor iz’kqYd dh olwyh djus ds fy,

mi;qDr vkns’k tkjh fd;k Fkk rkfd iRru of/kZr ds ek/;e ls vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ij izksn~Hkwr O;; dk fgLlk olwy dj ldsA

7.3.

;g ns[kk x;k gS fd iRru }kjk izLrkfor rnFkZ nj mlds ewy izLrko esa iRru }kjk ;Fkk izLrkfor ds leku FkhA lhvksihVh us vius ewy izLrko esa

izLrkfor ?kkV’kqYd nj dks cuk, j[kus dk izLrko fd;k gS vkSj o”kZ 2013&14 ds fy, #0 117-60@Vu ds rnFkZ vuqeksnu ds fy, ekax dh gSA

izLrko rFkk lhvksihVh ds i= fnukad 9 flrEcj 2013 dh izkFkfed tkap ij] lhvksihVh ls gekjs i= fnukad 15 vDrwcj 2013 }kjk dqN fcUnqvksa ij

lwpuk Hkstus dk vuqjks/k fd;k x;k FkkA gekjs }kjk ekaxh xbZ lwpuk vkSj mlij lhvksihVh }kjk izsf”kr tokc uhps rkfydkc) fd, x, gSa%&

Ø-lalalala-

gek

gekjs }kjk ekaxh xbZ lwpuk

js }kjk ekaxh xbZ lwpuk

lhvksihVh }kjk izsf”kr tokc

(i)

lhvksihVh us gekjs }kjk mBk, x, dqN

fcUnqvksa dk tokc Hkstrs le; vius i=

fnukad 9 flrEcj 2013 }kjk crk;k Fkk fd

ihvks,y xfrfof/k ij vkjksI; fud”kZ.k ykxr

o”kZ 2012&13 ls 2014 ds fy, gky gh ds

lkekU; la’kks/ku izLrko esa lhvksihVh }kjk

Øe’k% #0 1570-96 yk[k] #0 1629-46 yk[k

vkSj #0 1722-24 yk[k dks la’kksf/kr dj

ekStwnk izLrko esa rnuq:ih vof/k ds fy,

Øe’k% #0 4633 yk[k] #0 4937 yk[k vkSj

#0 5633 yk[k fd;k x;k gSA bl lanHkZ esa]

d`Ik;k ihvks,y xfrfof/k esa vkcafVr vuqj{k.k

fud”kZ.k ykxr ds la’kksf/kr vuqekuksa ds fy,

foLr`r x.kuk,a Hksts vkSj bl iz;kstu ds fy,

Mªsftax dkiksZjs’ku vkWQ bafM;k fyfeVsM ds

lkFk fd, x, djkj dh izfr;ksa ds lkFk bls

lefFkZr fd;k x;k gSA

pSuyksa ds fofHkUu LFkkuksa esa vkcafVr la’kksf/kr vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ek=k dh foLr`r x.kuk,a uhps nh

xbZ gSa%&

lhvksVh ds fy, vkjksI; vuqj{k.k

fud”kZ.k 12-5 ehVj Mqcko

vkbZlhVhVh ds fy, vkjksI; vuqj{k.k

fud”kZ.k 14-5 eh0 Mqcko

vkarfjd pSuy cFkksZa ds fy, vkjksI;

vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k 10-7 eh- Mqcko

dqy ek=k

csflu

igqapekxZ pSuy

csflu

igqapekxZ pSuy

csflu

igqapekxZ pSuy

ckg~;

pSuy

vkarfjd

pSuy

ckg~;

pSuy

vkarfjd

pSuy

ckg~;

pSuy

vkarfjd

pSuy

0.0

3.8

3.1

1.5

3.0

1.5

0.0

2.2

2.9

18.0

ihvks,y xfrfof/k ds fy, vkcafVr vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr ds la’kksf/kr vuqekuksa dh foLr`r

x.kuk uhps nh xbZ gS%&

12-5 ehVj Mqcko ij

ckg~; pSuy ij 3-8 fefy;u

ehVj

vkarfjd pSuy ij 3-1

fefy;u ?ku ehVj

nj izfr ?ku ehVj

#0 48.80

#0 73.20

fud"kZ.k ykxr

#0 18.54 djksM+ .

#0 22.69 djksM+

lfoZl VSdl @

12.36%

#0 02.29 djksM+

#0 02.81 djksM+

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY

[PART III—SEC. 4]

dqy fud”kZ.k ykxr

#0 20.83 djksM+

#0 25.50 djksM+

ldy tksM+

#0 46.33 djksM+

vizSy 2011 ls ekpZ 2014 rd iRru pSuyksa esa vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykus ds fy, iRru rFkk eS-

MhlhvkbZ fyfeVsM ds chp djkj dh iqf”V djus okys nLrkostksa dh izfr;ka Hksth gSaA Hksts x, djkj

dh izfr ds vuqlkj] vuqj{k.k ds fy, fud”kZ.k ykxr fuEufyf[kr gS%&

2011-12 #0 104.40 djksM+

2012-13 #0 105.30 djksM+

2013-14 #0 109.80 djksM+

lhvksihVh izLrko ls ;g fofnr gS fd iRru

ds vkarfjd gkjcj esa fLFkr ukWFkZ VSadj cFkZ

¼,uVhch½] lkÅFk VSadj cFkZ ¼,lVhch½ vkSj

dksphu vkW;y VfeZuy ¼lhvksVh½ dPpk rsy

vkSj ihvks,y mRiknksa dk izgLru djrs gSaA

iRru us crk;k gS fd 12-5 ehVj dk of/kZr

Mqcko lhvksVh esa O;ofLFkr fd;k tkuk gS vkSj

mldk ykHk lhvksVh esa izgfLrr dkxksZ iksrksa ds

fy, miyC/k gksxkA ,uVhch rFkk ,lVhch es

Mqcko dsoy 9-14 ehVj ij O;ofLFkr fd;k

tkuk crk;k x;k gSA bl lanHkZ esa] d`Ik;k bl

rF; ds vkyksd esa ,lVhch rFkk ,uVhch esa

izgfLrr ihvks,y lfgr vkarfjd gkjcj ij

lHkh ihvks,y dkxksZ ds fy, ,dleku :Ik ls

izLrkfor of/kZr ?kkV’kqYd olwy djus ds fy,

vk/kkj dk vkSfpR; crk,a fd of/kZr Mqcko ds

ykHk bu nks cFkksZa vFkkZr ,lVhch vkSj ,uVhch

esa miyC/k ugha gSA

lHkh vkarfjd VSadj cFkksZa esa ihvks,y ds fy, ,dleku ?kkV’kqYd iRru }kjk izLrkfor fd;k x;k

gS D;ksafd rsy dEifu;ka fuEurj Mqcko VfeZuy ij ynku ds fy, yxkrkj iksr ysrs gSa vkSj rc

mPprj Mqcko lhvksVh esa p<+krs gSaA lhvksVh esa mrkjs x, cM+s vk;kr iklZy izkIr fd, tkus ds

le; Hkh vkSj muds vuqjks/k ij ,uVhch@,lVhch esa LFkkukarfjr fd, tk jgs gSaA dksphu iRru

tks ,lih,e ds ek/;e ls dPps rsy dk vk;kr djrk gS vkSj VSadj cFkksZa ds ek/;e ls fjQkbaM

mRiknksa ds vkokxeu dh O;oLFkk djrk gS] ds ihvks,y FkzqiqV esa blds dksfPp fjQkbujh ds ys[kk

ij chihlh,y dk fizMksfeusal gSA

izLrko izLrqr fd, tkus ls igys chihlh,y ds lkFk gqbZ ppkZ ds nkSjku] mUgksaus vkarfjd gkjcj

esa lHkh VSadj cFkksZa ds fy, ?kkV’kqyd dh ,dleku nj j[kus dk lq>ko fn;k FkkA Vh,,eih dks

lacksf/kr muds i= fnukad 18&09&2013 esa] chihlh,y us leku ?kkV’kqYd fjtkbe ds v/khu Hkh

lkÅFk dksy cFkZ ‘kkfey djus dk lq>ko fn;k FkkA rFkkfi] iRru dk er gS fd pwafd lkÅFk

dksy cFkZ esa lqfo/kk,a ,uVhch rFkk ,lVhch esa miyC/k lqfo/kkvksa dh vis{kk cgqr dg gS] vU;

VSadj cFkksZa ds lkFk ,llhch ds lekos’ku ds fy, chihlh,y dk lq>ko vkSfpR;ijd ugha gSA

fiNys lkekU; la’kks/ku vkns’k esa fofHkUu xfrfof/k;ksa@mi&xfrfof/k;ksa ds chp lhvksihVh }kjk vuqekfur rFkk vkcafVr vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr] fiNys

lkekU; la’kks/ku vkns’k fnukad 1 vizSy 2013 esa bl izkf/kdj.k }kjk lqfopkfjr vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr vuqeku vkSj iRru }kjk vius i= fnukad 9 flrEcj 2013

}kjk vius ekStwnk izLrko ij nkf[ky fd, x, ykxr fooj.k esa lhvksihVh }kjk izsf”kr la’kksf/kr vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr uhps rkfydkc) dh xbZ gS%&

Ø-lalalala-

fooj.k

lhvksihVh }kjk vius njeku ds lke

lhvksihVh }kjk vius njeku ds lkekU;

kU;

la’kks/ku ds fy, fiNys izLrko lqfopkfjr

Vh,,eih }kjk vius vkns’k fnukad 1 vizSy

2013 }kjk lqfopkfjr

lhvksihVh }kjk vius i= fnukad 9&9&2013

esa ekStwnk izLrko ij lqfopkfjr

2012-13

2013-14

2014-15

2012-13

2013-14

2014-15

2012-13

2013-14

2014-15

vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr

iksr lacaf/kr xfrfof/k

(i).

iRru ns;rk,a

3504.45

3634.95

3841.92

4028.10

4178.10

4416.00

2586.41

2772.62

3163.49

(ii).

ikbyVst

3504.45

3634.95

3841.92

4028.10

4178.10

4416.00

2586.41

2772.62

3163.49

(iii). cFkZ fdjk;k

3504.45

3634.95

3841.92

4028.10

4178.10

4416.00

2586.41

2772.62

3163.49

dkxksZ izgLru xfrfof/k

(i).

ihvks,y

1570.96

1629.46

1722.24

----

-----

4633.00

4937.00

5633.00

dqy vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr (1)

+ (2)

12084.31

12534.31

13248.00

12084.31

12534.31

13248.00

12392.23

13254.86

15123.47

[k.

vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr

dks iwjk djus ds fy,

lqfopkfjr

jktLo

fgLlsnkjh dk fgLlk*

iksr lacaf/kr xfrfof/k

(i).

iRru ns;rk,a

708.60

856.00

1027.17

1417.19

1712.01

2054.33

890.52

856.00

1027.17

(ii).

ikbyVst

708.60

856.00

1027.17

1417.19

1712.01

2054.33

890.52

856.00

1027.17

(iii). cFkZ fdjk;k

708.60

856.00

1027.17

1417.19

1712.01

2054.33

890.52

856.00

1027.17

tksM+ ¼[k½

2158.8

2568.00

3081.51

4251.57

5136.03

6162.99

2671.56

2568.00

3081.51

vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr dk ‘ks”k

¼d&[k½

9925.51

9966.31

10166.49

7832.74

7398.28

7085.01

9720.67

10686.86

12041.96

¹Hkkx IIIµ[k.M 4º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vlk/kj.k

vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ds fgLls dks iwjk djus ds fy, jktLo fgLlsnkjh ds 25 izfr’kr ij fopkj fd;k Fkk tcfd bl izkf/kdj.k us ml O;; dks iwjk djus ds

fy, jktLo fgLlsnkjh ds 50 izfr’kr ij fopkj fd;k FkkA

10.1. bl ekeys esa la;qDr lquokbZ 29 vDrwcj 2013 dks lhvksihVh esa vk;ksftr dh xbZ FkhA lhvksihVh us vius izLrko dk ikoj IokbaV izLrqrhdj.k fn;k FkkA

la;qDr lquokbZ esa] lhvksihVh rFkk lac) mi;ksDrkvksa@laxBu fudk;ksa us vius fuosnu is’k fd, FksA

10.2. Hkkjr isVªksfy;e dkiksZjs’ku fyfeVsM ¼dksfPp fjQkbujht fyfeVsM½ us Hkh lhvksihVh ds izLrko ij laf{kIr ikoj IokbaV izLrqrhdj.k fn;k FkkA

11.1. la;qDr lquokbZ esa] lhvksihVh ls mlds i= 8 vDrwcj 2013 }kjk vxzsf”kr o”kZ 2011&12 rFkk 2012&13 ds fy, Mªsftax dkiksZjs’ku vkWQ bafM;k ¼MhlhvkbZ½

dh vuqca/k izfr esa fufnZ”V dh xbZ ykxr ds lkis{k mlds i= fnukad 9 flrEcj 2013 }kjk la’kksf/kr vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr ds vuqekuksa esa csesy ds dkj.k Li”V

djus dk vuqjks/k fd;k x;k FkkA

11.2. bl laca/k esa] lhvksihVh us vius i= fnukad 31 vDrwcj 2013 }kjk fuEufyf[kr Li”V fd;k gS%&

(i)

vuqca/k ds vuqlkj] 2012&13 ds nkSjku vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ds dk;Z ds fy, lhvksihVh }kjk Lohd`r dher #0 105-30 djksM+ gSA bl jkf’k ds

vykok] iRru dks [kaM 9-1 & ^^vuqorhZ dher fHkUurkvksa ds fy, dher lek;kstu^^ ¼izfr izsf”kr½ esa ;Fkk nh xbZ bZa/k dher esa o`f) ds fy,

MhlhvkbZ dks {kfriwfrZ djuh gksxhA nksuksa Hkqxrkuksa ij] iRru dks fu/kkZfjr njksa ij lfoZl VSDl vnk djuk gksxkA 2012&13 esa] iRru us bZa/ku

o`f) lfgr #0 110-29 djksM+ dk O;; fd;k FkkA bl izdkj] 12-36 izfr’kr dh nj ls lfoZl VSDl lfgr vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ij dqy O;; #0

123-92 djksM+ gksxkA

(ii)

2013&14 ds fy, vuqcaf/kr jkf’k #0 109-80 djksM+ gSA iRru dks mEehn gS fd bZa/ku o`f) lfgr o”kZ ds nkSjku O;; #0 118 djksM+ gksxkA

;g uksV fd;k tk, fd ;g jkf’k 2013&14 ds fy, gekjs la’kksf/kr vuqekuksa esa ‘kkfey dh xbZ gSA blfy,] iRru us bl ‘kh”kZ ds v/khu #0

132-54 djksM+ dh jkf’k dk vuqeku yxk;k gS ftlesa 12-36 izfr’kr dh nj ls lfoZl VSDl ‘kkfey gSA

(iii)

iRru dks o”kZ 2014&15 ds fy, iRru pSuyksa ds vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ds dk;Z dk VsaMj fudkyuk gksxkA izLrko tek fd, tkus ds le;] o”kZ

2014&15 ds fy, #0 151-23 djksM+ dk O;; vuqekfur fd;k x;k FkkA rFkkfi] MhlhvkbZ lfgr laHkkoh cksyhnkrkvksa ds lkFk gky gh esa gqbZ

ppkZvksa ij vk/kkfjr gS] ;g vuqeku yxk;k x;k gS fd dher esa vkxs vkSj o`f) gksxhA blfy,] #0 150 djksM+ dh jkf’k ¼fcuk lfoZl VSDl½

2014&15 ds fy, ctV vuqekuksa esa miyC/k djokus ds fy, lqfopkfjr dh xbZ gSA

12.

gekjs vuqjks/k ij] lhvksihVh us ckn esa vius i= bZesy fnukad 5 uoEcj 2013 }kjk 1 vizSy 2013 ls 31 vDrwcj 2013 vof/k ds fy, iRru cFkZ ij

izgfLrr ihvks,y ;krk;kr vkSj ,lih,e ij izgfLrr dPps rsy dk czsdvi Hkstk x;k gS tksfd fuEuor~ gS%&

Ø-lalalala-

cFkZ uke

dkxksZ izdkj

Ekk=k ¼Vuk

Ekk=k ¼Vuksa esa½

sa esa½

cksV Vªsu fi;j ¼chVhih½

ihvks,y mRikn

26826

lkmFk dksy cFkZ ¼,llhch½

ihvks,y mRikn

26065

lkmFk VSadj cFkZ ¼,lVhch½

ihvks,y mRikn

134439

ukWFkZ VSadj cFkZ ¼,uVhch½

ihvks,y mRikn

978215

dksphu vkW;y VfeZuy ¼lhvksVh½

ihvks,y mRikn

1205286

mi tksM+

2370831

flaxy IokbaV ewfjax ¼,lih,e½

dPpk rsy

6374750

ldy tksM+

8745581

13.

bl ekeys esa ijke’kZ laca/kh dk;Zokfg;ka bl izkf/kdj.k ds dk;kZy; ds vfHkys[kksa esa miyC/k gSaA izkIr gqbZ fVIif.k;ksa vkSj lac) i{kksa }kjk dh xbZ fVIif.k;ksa

dk lkj izklafxd i{kksa dks vyx ls Hkstk tk,xkA ;s C;ksjs gekjh osclkbV http://tariffauthority.gov.in ij miyC/k djok, tk,axsA

14.

bl ekeys dh dk;Zokgh ds nkSjku ,d= dh xbZ lexz lwpuk ds lanHkZ esa] fuEufyf[kr fLFkfr izdV gksrh gS%&

(i)

bl izkf/kdj.k us vius njeku ds lkekU; la’kks/ku ds fy, dksphu iRru U;kl ds izLrko dk fuiVku djrs gq, ,d vkns’k la-

Vh,,eih@49@2011&lhvksihVh fnukad 1 vizSy 2013 ikfjr fd;k Fkk ftls 10 twu 2013 dks Hkkjr ds jkti= esa vf/klwfpr fd;k x;k FkkA

;gka ij mYys[k djuk izklafxd gS fd lhvksihVh }kjk nkf[ky fd;k x;k lkekU; la’kks/ku izLrko bl izkf/kdj.k }kjk 1 vizSy 2013 dks

fuiVk;k x;k Fkk] lhvksihVh us lHkh iz’kqYd enksa dh njksa esa ;FkkfLFkfr cuk, j[kus dk izLrko fd;k x;k FkkA

rS;kj fd, x, rFkk iz’kqYd vkns’k fnukad 1 vizSy 2013 ds lkFk layXu fd, x, ykxr fooj.k esa o”kZ 2012&13 ls 2014&15 ds fy, ykxr

fLFkfr dk vuqeku yxk;k x;k FkkA o”kZ 2012&13 ds fy, lexz iRru gsrq iz’kqYd ds ¼rRdkyhu½ ekStwnk Lrj ij ykxr fLFkfr esa yxHkx 20

izfr’kr dk ?kkVk n’kkZ;k x;k Fkk tks iwjh rjg ls #0 75-17 djksM+ ifjxf.kr gqvk FkkA vuqorhZ nks o”kksZa 2013&14 vkSj 2014&15 ds fy,]

ykxr fooj.k us 0-29 izfr’kr dk ekewyh vf/k’ks”k n’kkZ;k Fkk] tks iwjh rjg ls #0 2-67 djksM+ ifjxf.kr fd;k x;k FkkA pwafd vkns’k ds

izHkkoh gksus ds le; rd o”kZ 2012&13 [kRe gks pqdk gksxk] blfy, o”kZ 2013&14 vkSj 2014&15 ds fy, ykxr fLFkfr ij vkf[kjdkj fopkj

fd;k x;k FkkA

nks o”kksZa 2013&14 vkSj 2014&15 dh vof/k ds fy, laink xfrfof/k ds vykok lexz iRru ds fy, vuqekfur ykxr fLFkfr #0 71-63 djksM+

dk vf/k’ks”k vFkkZr 8-59 izfr’kr dk vkSlr fuoy vf/k’ks”k n’kkZ;k FkkA rFkkfi] Lohdkj djrs gq, fd 31 ekpZ 2012 ds vuqlkj ,DP;wfj;y

ewY;kadu ds vuqlkj isa’ku fuf/k esa #0 1273 djksM+ dk Hkkjh deh gqbZ Fkh vkSj fd iRru us vius lkeus is’k foRrh; ladV Ikj fopkj djrs

gq, vkSj ;g Hkh Lohdkj djrs gq, fuf/k dks c<+kus dk izLrko ugha fd;k Fkk fd o”kZ 2012&13 ds fy, vuqekfur ykxr fLFkfr us #0 46-37

djksM+] laink xfrfof/k dks NksM+dj] ?kkVk n’kkZ;k Fkk] vxys nks o”kksZa 2013&14 ls 2014&15 ds fy, ¼rRdkyhu½ ekStwnk iz’kqYd dks tkjh j[kus

ds fy, lhvksihVh dk izLrko vuqeksfnr fd;k x;k FkkA

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY

[PART III—SEC. 4]

(ii)

lhvksihVh }kjk nkf[ky fd;k x;k ekStwnk izLrko dksphu vkW;y VfeZuy ¼lhvksVh½ esa 12-5 ehVj Mqcko cuk, j[kus ds fy, iRru }kjk

izksn~Hkwr vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr ds fy, {kfriwfrZ dh ekax ds fy, gS ftlesa iRru us crk;k gS fd izeq[k rsy mi;ksDrk chihlh,y ds lkFk

iRru }kjk fd, x, le>kSrk Kkiu ¼,evks;w½ dh xqatkb’k ls ijs gSA lhvksihVh us crk;k gS fd chvksVh izpkyd bafM;k xsVos VfeZuy izkbosV

fyfeVsM ¼vkbZthVhih,y½ }kjk lhvksihVh ds lkFk fd, x, djkj ds vuqlkj iRru dks iRru ds cFkZ D;w 8 vkSj D;w 9 esa vkbZthVhih,y }kjk

izpkfyr daVsuj VfeZuy ds fy, 12-5 ehVj dk Mqcko cuk, j[kuk FkkA pwafd lhvksVh Hkh mlh {ks= esa Fkk] blfy, rsy mi;ksDrkvksa us 12-5 ds

of/kZr Mqcko dk ykHk mBk;k Fkk vkSj fcuk dksbZ vfrfjDr vkmVxks ds xgjs Mqcko okys iksrksa dks ykdj ekyHkkM+s esa eku dh bdkWueht+ dk

ykHk Hkh mBk;k FkkA iRru us fuosnu fd;k gS fd vkbZthVhih,y us Qjojh 2011 esa okykjikne esa vkbZlhVhVh esa vius izpkyuksa dks

LFkkukarfjr dj fn;k Fkk vkSj blfy, lhvksihVh D;w 8 vkSj D;w 9 ij 12-5 ehVj dk of/kZr Mqcko cuk, j[kus ds fy, ck/;dkjh ugha gSA

crk;k x;k gS fd twu 2003 esa chihlh,y ds lkFk lhvksihVh }kjk fd, x, ,evks;w ds vuqlkj] iRru dks lhvksVh esa dsoy 9-14 ehVj Mqcko

cuk, j[kuk FkkA ijUrq] rsy ih,l;w eq[;r% chihlh,y] us iRru ls lhvksVh esa 12-5 ehVj ds of/kZr Mqcko dks cuk, j[kus dk vuqjks/k fd;k

Fkk Hkys gh vkbZthVhih,y us vius daVsuj izpkyu vkbZlhVhVh] okykjikne esa LFkkukarfjr dj fn, FksA iRru lhvksVh esa ihvks,y mi;ksDrkvksa

ds fy, 12-5 ehVj dk visf{kr Mqcko miyC/k djokus ds fy, lger Fkk ijUrq lhvksVh esa ihvks,y mi;ksDrkvksa ds fy, iRru }kjk

izksn~Hkwr@izksn~Hkwr fd, tkus ds fy, vuqekfur vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr dh olwyh djus ds fy, {kfriwfrZ dh ekax dh gSA

bl ifjizs{; esa] iRru us dksphu vkW;y VfeZuy ¼lhvksVh½] ukFkZ cFkZ VSadj ¼,uVhch½ vkSj lkmFk cFkZ VSadj ¼,lVhch½ ij iRru ds cFkZ ij

izgfLrr ihvks,y ds fy, #0 65@Vu dh ekStwnk ?kkV’kqYd nj esa o`f) o”kZ 2012&13 esa #0 110-90 izfr Vu] o”kZ 2013&14 esa #0 117-60

izfr Vu vkSj o”kZ 2014&15 esa #0 149-78 Vu dh ekax djus okyk ekStwnk izLrko nkf[ky fd;k gSA

(iii)

ekStwnk izLrko nkf[ky djus ds fy, lhvksihVh ds eq[; nkoksa dks uhps lkjc) fd;k x;k gS%&

(d)

fiNys lkekU; la’kks/ku vkns’k esa] lhvksihVh us vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr ds Hkkx dks ihvks,y xfrfof/kr esa izHkkftr fd;k FkkA

rFkkfi] bl izkf/kdj.k us 1 vizSy 2013 ds vius vkns’k esa iRru }kjk vaxhd`r n`f”Vdks.k dh vuqefr ugha nh FkhA la’kksf/kr

ykxr fooj.k esa bl izkf/kdj.k us iRru }kjk izHkkftr vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr dks iksr lacaf/kr mi&xfrfof/k;ksa ds fy,

ihvks,y xfrfof/k esa iqu% forfjr fd;k x;k Fkk tcfd 2005 ds iz’kqYd fn’kkfunsZ’kksa esa ,slk mYys[k ugha fd;k x;k gSA

lhvksihVh us fuosnu fd;k gS fd blds iRru ij mPp flyVs’ku dh otg ls lhvksihVh dh vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr dksydkrk

iRru U;kl ds ckn nwljh mPpre gSA bl izkf/kdj.k }kjk lEiw.kZ vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr dk cks> iksr lacaf/kr xfrfof/k ij

yknus ds rjhds ls iwoZdky esa iksr lacaf/kr cnykoksa esa rhoz c<ksrjh gqbZ tcfd ihvks,y ds fy, ?kkV’kqYd nj o”kZ 1996&97 ls

#0 65@& izfr Vu ds leku Lrj ij cuk, j[kk x;k gSA mi;qZDr fLFkfr ds en~nsutj] vkSj blfy, Hkh fd pwafd iRru dks

lhvksVh esa 12-5 ehVj dk visf{kr Mqcko] ihvks,y mi;ksDrkvksa ds vuqjks/k ij] miyC/k djokus ds fy, lhvksVh esa vfrfjDr

vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr [kpZ djuk gksxk vkSj ;g Lohdkj djrs gq, fd iRru mi;ksDrk mlds fy, iRru dks {kfriwfrZ djus ds

fy, lger gSa] iRru us ihvks,y xfrfof/k ds fy, vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr ds izHkktu ds vius n`f”Vdks.k dks Lohdkj djus dk

vuqjks/k fd;k gSA

([k)

lhvksihVh }kjk izsf”kr vkSj 2013 esa lhvksihVh ,lvksvkj ds lkekU; la’kks/ku vkns’k esa bl izkf/kdj.k }kjk fo’okl fd, x,

la’kksf/kr ;krk;kr iwokZuqeku ldy vfr&vuqeku gSaA fiNys iz’kqYd vkns’k esa lhvksihVh }kjk vuqekfur la’kksf/kr ;krk;kr izkIr

ugha fd;k tk ldk gSA blfy,] iRru us ekStwnk izLrko esa vc izsf”kr la’kksf/kr ;krk;kr vuqekuksa ij fopkj djus dk vuqjks/k

fd;k gSA

(iv)

(d)

fiNys iz’kqYd vkns’k esa iksr lacaf/kr xfrfof/k ds fy, vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr ds izHkktu ls lacaf/kr mi;qZDr (iii) ¼d½ ij

lhvksihVh }kjk dgh xbZ ckr ds laca/k esa] ;gka ij mYys[k djuk izklafxd gS fd 2005 fn’kkfunsZ’k iz’kqYd ds fu/kkZj.k ds fy,

c`gr~ fn’kkfunsZ’k fu/kkZfjr djrs gSaA 2005 ds fn’kkfunsZ’kksa dh ?kks”k.k ds ckn] bl izkf/kdj.k us egkiRru U;kl }kjk iz’kqYd izLrko

nkf[ky djus ds fy, izk:Ik fu/kkZfjr fd;k FkkA ;gka ij ;g mYys[k djuk Hkh izklafxd gksxk fd egkiRru U;kl eS0 ,l-ch-

fcfyeksfj;k ,aM dEiuh }kjk rS;kj fd, x, vkSj iksr ifjogu ea=ky; }kjk Hkkjr ljdkj ds egkys[kk fu;a=d ds lkFk

fopkj&foe’kZ ls Lohdkj fd, ys[kkadu izk:iksa dk vuqlj.k fd;k gSA egkiRru U;klksa }kjk iz’kqYd la’kks/ku izLrko nkf[ky djus

ds fy, bl izkf/kdj.k }kjk fu/kkZfjr izk:Ik ykxr fooj.k esa fofHkUu xfrfof/k;ksa@mi&xfrfof/k;ksa ds chp foLrkj ls fofHkUu

ykxr rRoksa dk izHkktu fu/kkZfjr djrk gS vkSj lkekU;r% eS0 ,l-ch- fcfyeksfj;k ,aM dEiuh ds ys[kkadu izk:iksa dh iqf”V gS

ftls egkiRru U;klksa }kjk vuqlfjr fd;k x;k gSA egkiRru U;klksa }kjk iz’kqYd la’kks/ku izLrko nkf[ky djus ds fy, fu/kkZfjr

izk:Ik ds vuqlkj] xksfn;ksa rFkk canj esa vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr fudf”kZr flYV ds vk/kkj ij iRru lsokvksa vkSj cfFkZax ds chp

izHkkftr fd;k tkuk gS vkSj pSuy fud”kZ.k ds fy, izksn~Hkwr vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr dks iRru ns;rkvksa rFkk ikbyVst xfrfof/k

ds chp izHkkftr fd;k tkuk gSA ;g mYys[kuh; gS fd o”kZ 2010&11 vkSj 2011&12 ds fy, dksphu iRru U;kl ds okf”kZd ys[ks

Hkh iksr lcaf/kr xfrfof/k ds v/khu vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr fjiksVZ djrs gSa vkSj ihvks,y dkxksZ ds fy, dkxksZ lacaf/kr xfrfof/k ds

fy, bl ykxr dk dksbZ vkcaVu ugha fn[kkrs gSaA lhvksihVh ds fiNys iz’kqYd la’kks/ku vkns’k esa bl izkf/kdj.k }kjk vaxhd`r

n`f”Vdks.k iz’kqYd izLrko nkf[ky djus ds fy, fu/kkZfjr izk:Ik ds vuqlkj gS vkSj lHkh egkiRru U;klksa ij ,dleku :Ik ls

vuqlfjr fd;k tkrk gSA

U;w esaxywj iRru U;kl esa fd, x, foiFku ds ckjs esa lhvksihVh }kjk mfYyf[kr fcUnq ds laca/k esa] ;g ns[kuk gksxk fd bl

izkf/kdj.k us lhvksihVh ds lkekU; la’kks/ku vkns’k fnukad 25 tuojh 2007 esa crk;k Fkk fd U;w easxywj iRru esa nks izeq[k

mi;ksDrkvksa }kjk izgfLrr dPps rsy vkSj ykSg v;Ld ds fy, ?kkV’kqYd nj fu/kkZfjr djrs le; U;w esaxywj iRru U;kl ds

ekeys esa] fud”kZ.k ykxr ds izklafxd fgLls lfgr lHkh iksr lacaf/kr ykxr vkSj izgLru ykxr izfr Vu ?kkV’kqYd nj ij igqapus

ds fy, ,d lkFk lqfopkfjr fd, x, gSa rkfd cM+s vkdkj ds rsy rFkk v;Ld iksrksa ds fy, xgjk Mqcko cuk, j[kus dh ykxr

NksVs iksrksa ij ugha Mkys x, gSa ftUgsa ,slh xgjkbZ dh vko’;drk ugha gksrh gSA okLro esa] U;w esaxywj iRru U;kl ds ekeys esa

vuqlfjr n`f”Vdks.k m/kkj ysrs gq,] bl izkf/kdj.k us 25 tuojh 2007 ds mDr iz’kqYd vkns’k esa iRru }kjk izgfLrr izeq[k

¹Hkkx IIIµ[k.M 4º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vlk/kj.k

?kVdksa ds fy, fo’kk[kkiRrue iRru U;kl vkSj U;w esaxywj iRru U;kl tSls dqN vU; egkiRru U;klksa }kjk fd, x, vxys

iz’kqYd la’kks/ku ds le; dkxksZ rFkk iksr nksuksa ds fy, dPps rsy ds fy, i`Fkd ykxr fooj.k nkf[ky djus ds fy, iRru dks

lykg nh Fkh vkSj ml le; lhvksihVh }kjk fd, x, fuosnuksa ds en~nsutj ihvks,y xfrfof/k ds fy, vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr

ds izHkktu dh vuqefr nh FkhA

Ok”kZ 2010 esa lhvksihVh ds vxys lkekU; la’kks/ku izLrko ij dk;Zokgh djrs le;] iRru ls iSjk 7-2 Ø-la- I (10)(i) esa ;Fkk

izfrosfnr 2007 ds iz’kqYd vkns’k esa iznRr lykg ds vuqlkj iRru cFkksZa esa vkSj ,lih,e ij izgfLrr dPps rsy ds fy, dkxksZ

rFkk iksr lacaf/kr xfrfof/k nksuksa ds fy, dPps rsy ds fy, i`Fkd ykxr fooj.k nkf[ky djus dh lykg nh xbZ FkhA rFkkfi]

lhvksihVh us 2007 ds iz’kqYd vkns’k esa lykg vuqlkj ihvks,y ds fy, i`Fkd ykxr fooj.k nkf[ky ugha fd;k FkkA bl

izkf/kdj.k us iz’kqYd vkns’k fnukad 23 Qjojh 2010 ds iSjk esa izfrosfnr dkj.kksa ls fd ihvks,y izgLru dk eq[; fgLlk iRru

dh tsV~Vh ls chihlh,y&dsvkj,y }kjk izpkfyr ,lih,e esa LFkkukarfjr fd;k x;k gS ftlds fy, i`Fkd iz’kqYd <kapk Lohd`r

djuk t:jh ugha Fkk fd ihvks,y izgLru xfrfof/kr ds fy, vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr ds vkcaVu fgLls dks tkjh j[kus dk

ifjn`’; gSA Qjojh 2010 ds iz’kqYd vkns’k esa vuqlfjr n`f”Vdks.k iksr lacaf/kr xfrfof/k;ksa ds fy, vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr ds

izHkktu ds laca/k esa 1 vizSy 2013 ds gky gh ds lkekU; la’kks/ku vkns’k esa vuqlfjr fd;k x;k FkkA ekStwnk izLrko esa iRru

}kjk fd;k x;k fuosnu fd bldks ihvks,y mi;ksDrkvksa ds vuqjks/k ij lhvksVh esa 12-5 ehVj dk Mqcko O;ofLFkr djuk gksxk

tksfd iRru ds Mqcko Lrj ls ijs gS ekStwnk izLrko esa iRru dk ,d u;k fuosnu cuk, j[kus ds fy, ekuk x;k gSA mi;qZDr ds

en~nsutj] ;g ik;k x;k gS fd 1 vizSy 2013 ds blds iz’kqYd la’kks/ku vkns’k esa fd, x, vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr ds izHkktu

ds laca/k esa lhvksihVh }kjk crkbZ xbZ ,slh dksbZ xyrh fn[kkbZ ugha nsrh gSA

([k)

;krk;kr iwokZuqekuksa ij (iii) ¼[k½ esa lhvksihVh }kjk dgh xbZ ckr ds laca/k esa] iz’kqYd vkns’k fnukad 1 vizSy 2013 ds iSjk

11(iv)(x) dk lanHkZ mfYyf[kr djuk izklafxd gS ftlesa ;g izfrosfnr fd;k x;k gS fd lhvksihVh }kjk vuqekfur la’kksf/kr

;krk;kr fcuk fdlh la’kks/ku ds lqfopkfjr fd, x, gSaA tSlkfd mDr vkns’k ds iSjk 11(v)(d)(i) esa crk;k x;k gS] ,lih,e

rFkk iRru ds cFkZ ds cph la’kksf/kr ihvks,y iz’kqYd dk czsdvi ugha Hksts tkus dh otg ls] o”kZ 2012&13 ls 2014&15 ds fy,

iRru }kjk izsf”kr ihvks,y dk la’kksf/kr ;krk;kr iRru }kjk ykxw fd;k x;k dkxksZ fgLlsnkjh ykxw djrs gq, Øe’k% 32 izfr’kr

vkSj 68 izfr’kr ij iRru ds cFkZ rFkk ,lih,e esa izHkkftr fd;k x;k gSA bl izdkj] bl izkf/kdj.k us fiNys iz’kqYd vkns’k esa

ykxr fLFkfr dk fu/kkZj.k djrs le; lhvksihVh }kjk izsf”kr la’kksf/kr ;krk;kr vuqekuksa ij iwjh rjg ls fo’okl fd;k FkkA

blfy, lhvksihVh us 1 vizSy 2013 ds vkns’k esa lqfopkfjr ;krk;kr iwokZuqekuksa ij ,slh dksbZ =qfV fn[kkbZ nsus ds ckjs esa ugha

crk;k FkkA

(x)

;gka ij ;g crkuk izklafxd gS fd lkekU; la’kks/ku ekeys dh lEiw.kZ dk;Zokgh ds nkSjku tks vizSy 2013 esa gky gh esa gh

lekfgr fd;k x;k gS] lhvksihVh us ;g ugha crk;k Fkk fd ,evks;w esa visf{kr Lrj ls ijs ihvks,y mi;ksDrkvksa ds fy, vuqj{k.k

fud”kZ.k ykxr ogu djsxk vkSj blfy, ykxr ihvks,y xfrfof/k esa izHkkftr dh tkuh pkfg,A blds }kjk mfYyf[kr dkj.k ds

fy, ihvks,y mi;ksDrkvksa ls vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr olwy djus ds fy, ekStwnk izLrko esa lhvksihVh }kjk ,d fd;k x;k

fuosnu ,d u;k fuosnu gSA

ekpZ 2005 ds iz’kqYd fn’kkfunsZ’kksa ds [kaM 3-3-1 ds vuqlkj] izklafxd dk;Zokgh esa lqfopkfjr vfHkys[kksa ds lkeus izdV =qfV;ksa ds

lanHkZ esa gh leh{kk dh tk ldrh gSA ;g Li”V gS fd lhvksihVh us vkns’k fnukad 1 vizSy 2013 dh ekax djus okys fjdkMZ ds

lkeus izdV fdlh =qfV dks LFkkfir ugha fd;k gSA

rFkkfi] ekpZ 2005 ds iz’kqYd fn’kkfunsZ’kksa ds [kaM 3-1-8- tks iRru U;klksa dks lgh vkSj Ik;kZIr dkj.kksa ls le; ls igys iz’kqYd

ds la’kks/ku dk izLrko djus dh leFkZrk iznku djrk gS] ds en~nsutj vkSj ekStwnk izLrko esa lhvksihVh }kjk crkbZ xbZ vlk/kkj.k

fLFkfr ds en~nsutj vkSj ;g Hkh Lohdkj djrs gq, fd ihvks,y mi;ksDrkvksa dks Hkh of/kZr ?kkV’kqYd nj djus djus ds fy,

lger gksuk gksxk ;fn ihvks,y mi;ksDrkvksa }kjk ekax dh xbZ 12-5 ehVj dk of/kZr Mqcko miyC/k djokus ds fy, vuqj{k.k

fud”kZ.k ykxr dks iwjk djus ds fy, iRru dks leFkZrk iznku fd, tkus gsrq bl izkf/kdj.k }kjk vuqeksfnr fd;k tkrk gS] ;g

izkf/kdj.k iRru ds izLrko ij fopkj djus ds fy, izo`Rr gSA rFkkfi] lEiw.kZ fo’ys”k.k ihvks,y mi;ksDrkvksa ds vuqjks/k ij

lhvksVh cFkksZa esa 12-5 ehVj ds of/kZr Mqcko dks cuk, j[kus ds fy, iRru dks leFkZ cuk, tkus gsrq #0 65 izfr Vu dh ekStwnk

?kkV’kqYd nj ds vykok ihvks,y ds fy, fo’ks”k fud”kZ.k nj fu/kZfjr djus dh lhek rd lhfer fd;k x;k gSA ekStwnk dk;Zokgh

esa] lhvksihVh us dkxksZ rFkk iksr lacaf/kr xfrfof/k;ksa ds Hkhrj mi&xfrfof/k;ksa ds fy, dkxksZ] iksr rFkk laink lacaf/kr xfrfof/k;ksa

vkSj mi&xfrfof/k;ksa ds fy, xfrfof/k&okj ykxr fooj.k ds lkFk lexz iRru ds fy, lesfdr ykxr fooj.k ds lkFk ihvks,y

xfrfof/k ds fy, ykxr fooj.k Hkstk gSA iRru us okLrfodrkvksa ds lkFk 2012&13 ds vuqekuksa dks v|ru fd;k gS vkSj fiNys

iz’kqYd vkns’k dks vuqeksfnr djrs le; bl izkf/kdj.k }kjk lqfopkfjr vuqekuksa ds foijhr o”kZ 2013&14 vkSj 2014&15 ds fy,

;krk;kr] vk; rFkk vU; vuqekuksa ds la’kksf/kr vuqeku Hkh Hksts FksA rFkkfi] mi;qZDr dkj.kksa ls fd ;g dk;Zokgh ihvks,y ds fy,

izfr Vu fo’ks”k fud”kZ.k ysoh fu/kkZfjr djus ds fy, lhfer gS] lEiw.kZ fo’ys”k.k dqN la’kks/kuksa tksfd vuqorhZ vuqPNsnksa esa ;Fkk

Li”V fd, x, vuqlkj ihvks,y ds fy, izfr Vu fo’ks”k fud”kZk nj ij igqapus ds fy, visf{kr gSa] ds v/khu o”kZ 2012&13 ls

2014&15 ds fy, 1 vizSy 2013 ds fiNys iz’kqYd vkns’k esa bl izkf/kdj.k }kjk ;Fkk lqfopkfjr vuqekuksa dks cuk, j[kus ds fy,

fd;k x;k gSA

(v)

vkxs c<+us ls igys ;gka ij ;g mYys[k djuk izklafxd gS fd o”kZ 2012&13 ls 2013&14 ds fy, ihvks,y gsrq ?kkV’kqYd esa la’kks/ku ds fy,

vxLr 2013 esa izLrko nkf[ky djus ds ckn lhvksihVh us vius i= fnukad 8 vDrwcj 2013 }kjk o”kZ 2013&14 ds fy, #0 117-60 izfr eh-

V- ij ihvks,y mRiknksa ij rnFkZ ?kkV’kqYd izHkkj ds vuqeksnu dh ekax djus okyk izLrko nkf[ky fd;k FkkA ;g ns[kk x;k gS fd o”kZ

2013&14 ds fy, lhvksihVh }kjk izLrkfor rnFkZ nj o”kZ 2013&14 ds fy, ewy izLrko esa ;Fkk izLrkfor ds leku gSA 2005 ds iz’kqYd

fn’kkfunsZ’kksa dk [kaM 2-17-1 ls 2-17-4 ,sls u, dkxksZ@lsok ds fy, izLrko nkf[ky fd, tkus gsrq izko/kku fu/kkZfjr djrs gSa ftuds fy,

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY

[PART III—SEC. 4]

ekStwnk njeku esa dksbZ iz’kqYd fu/kkZfjr ugha fd;k x;k gksA ;s fn’kkfunsZ’k iRru dks rc rd varfje vof/k ds fy, rnFkZ vk/kkj ij izLrkfor

iz’kqYd dh lekukUrjr% olwyh djus ds fy, iRru dks vuqefr Hkh iznku djrs gSaA bl iz;kstu ds fy,] ;g nj rqyuh; lsok@dkxksZ ds fy,

ekStwnk vf/klwfpr iz’kqYd ds vk/kkj ij foifFkr djuk gksxk vkSj lac) mi;ksDrkvksa dh ijLij lgefr ls ,slk djuk gksxkA ekStwnk ekeys esa]

izLrkfor iz’kqYd ekStwnk ?kkV’kqYd nj ds la’kks/ku ds fy, u fd u, dkxksZ@lsok ds fy,A blds vykok] lhvksihVh us iRru }kjk izLrkfor

rnFkZ nj ds fy, lac) mi;ksDrkvksa dh lgefr Hkh ugha Hksth gSA nj ds rnFkZ vuqeksnu dh ekax djus ds fy, lhvksihVh }kjk nkf[ky fd;k

x;k izLrko fnukad 8 vDrwcj 2013 2005 ds iz’kqYd fn’kkfunsZ’kksa ds [kaM 2-17-1 ls 2-17-4 ds izko/kkuksa dk vuqikyu ugha djrk gS vkSj

blfy, ;g izkf/kdj.k dksbZ rnFkZ vuqeksnu iznku djus dh fLFkfr esa ugha gSA rFkkfi] lhvksihVh dks fdlh vykHkdkjh fLFkfr eas ugha j[kk x;k

gS pwafd bl izkf/kdj.k us bl ekeys dks gkFk esa fy;k Fkk vkSj varfjr vof/k ds fy, nj vuqeksfnr djus dh ctk; vafre nj fu/kkZfjr dh

FkhA

(vi)

ihvks,y xfrfof/k ds fy, vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr dk vkcaVu

fiNyh iz’kqYd la’kks/ku dk;Zokgh ds nkSjku] lhvksihVh us iksr lacaf/kr mi&xfrfof/k;ksa vFkkZr~ iRru ns;rk,a] ikbyVst rFkk cFkZ fdjk;k ds

vykok ihvks,y ¼dkxksZ izgLru½ xfrfof/k ds fy, vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr vuqeku ds izHkktu Hkkx dk izLrko fd;k FkkA fnukad 1 vizSy

2013 ds iz’kqYd vkns’k ds vuqPNsn 11 (vi) (p) esa izfrosfnr dkj.kksa ls] o”kZ 2012&13 ls 2014&15 ds fy, lhvksihVh }kjk vuqekfur

vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr Qjojh 2010 esa lhvksihVh ds iwoZorhZ iz’kqYd la’kks/ku vkns’k esa vuqlfjr n`f”Vdks.k ds vuqlkj iksr lacaf/kr xfrfof/k

ds v/khu mi&xfrfof/k;ksa iRru ns;rkvksa] ikbyVst rFkk cFkZ fdjk;s esa izHkkftr fd;k x;k FkkA

tSlkfd igys crk;k x;k gS] lhvksihVh us fuosnu fd;k gS fd ihvks,y mi;ksDrkvksa }kjk fd, x, vuqjks/k ij iRru ls ;g vis{kk dh xbZ gS

fd chihlh,y ds lkFk iRru }kjk fd, x, le>kSrk Kkiu ds vuqlkj visf{kr 9-14 ehVj ds Mqcko ds LFkku ij lhvksVh esa 12-5 ehVj dk

Mqcko O;ofLFkr fd;k tk,A bl otg ls ihvks,y xfrfof/k esa gksus okys ?kkVs ds fy, iRru dks {kfriwfrZ djus ds fy, rsy mi;ksDrk lger

gSa tksfd eq[; rsy mi;ksDrk &chihlh,y ds vius izpkyuksa dks ,lih,e esa LFkkukarfjr fd, tkus ds ckn ihvks,y ;krk;kr esa deh dh otg

ls Hkh gSA mi;qZDr fLFkfr ds en~nsutj] ihvks,y xfrfof/k ds fy, vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr ds izklafxd fgLls ds izHkktu ds fy, lhvksihVh

}kjk fd, x, vuqjks/k dks Lohdkj fd;k x;k gSA ;gka ij mYys[k djuk izklafxd gS fd iksr lacaf/kr xfrfof/k esa vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr ds

izHkktu djus dh fu/kkZfjr dk;Zi)fr ls ;g foiFku lhvksihVh }kjk lkeus ykbZ xbZ vlk/kkj.k ifjfLFkfr;ksa ds en~nsutj t:jh gks x;k gS

rkfd ihvks,y mi;ksDrkvksa ls #0 65 izfr Vu dh ekStwnk nj ds vykok olwy dh tkus okyh izfr Vu fo’ks”k fud”kZ.k ysoh ij igqapk tk

ldsA

(vii)

vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr ds la’kksf/kr vuqeku

vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr ds la’kksf/kr vuqeku %

fiNys iz’kqYd la’kks/ku vkns’k esa lhvksihVh }kjk vuqekfur dqy vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr o”kZ 2012&13 ls 2014&15 ds fy, Øe’k% #0 120-

84 djksM+] #0 125-34 djksM+ vkSj #0 132-48 djksM+ gS ftlij fo’okl fd;k x;k Fkk vkSj vizSy 2013 vkns’k ds iSjk 11 (vi) (p) esa ;Fkk

izfrosfnr fcuk fdlh la’kks/ku ds lqfopkfjr fd;k x;k FkkA iRru }kjk vc nkf[ky fd, x, ykxr fooj.kksa esa] ;g ns[kk x;k gS fd iRru us

vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ds vuqekuksa dks rnuq:ih vof/k ds fy, la’kksf/kr dj Øe’k% #0 123-92 djksM+] #0 132-55 djksM+ vkSj #0 151-23 djksM+

dj fn;k gSA iRru }kjk vxzsf”kr Mªsftax dkiksZjs’ku vkWQ bafM;k ¼MhlhvkbZ½ ds lkFk lhvksihVh }kjk fd, x, vuqca/k dh izfr n’kkZrh gS fd

rhu o”kksZa vFkkZr~ 2011&12 ls 2013&14 ds fy, vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k gsrq ykxr Øe’k% #0 104-40 djksM+] #0 105-30 djksM+ vkSj #0 109-80

djksM+ tek lfoZl VSDl gSA vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr ds la’kksf/kr vuqekuksa dk MhlhvkbZ ds lkFk gq, vuqca/k dh izfr esa n’kkZbZ xbZ njksa ls esy

ugha FkkA lhvksihVh us Li”V fd;k gS fd vuqca/k izfr esa fufnZ”V nj ds vykok] iRru dks vuqca/k ds [kaM 9-1 esa ;Fkk nh xbZ bZa/ku dher esa

o`f) ds fy, {kfriwfrZ djuh gksxhA iRru us bls nLrkost ds izklafxd fgLls dh izfr ls izekf.kr fd;k gSA iRru us o”kZ 2012&13 esa bZa/ku

o`f) vkSj lfoZl VSDl lfgr #0 123-92 djksM+ dk okLrfod O;; fd;k FkkA iRru us ;g Hkh Li”V fd;k gS fd gkykafd o”kZ 2013&14 ds

fy, vuqcaf/kr jkf’k #0 109-80 djksM+ gS] O;; bZa/ku o`f) lfgr #0 118 djksM+ vuqekfur fd;k gS ftls o”kZ 2013&14 ds fy, blds

la’kksf/kr vuqekuksa esa Hkh lqfopkfjr fd;k x;k gSA iRru us ykxr fooj.k esa o”kZ 2013&14 ds fy, #0 132-54 djksM+ ds O;; dk vuqeku

yxk;k gS ftlesa lfoZl VSDl ‘kkfey gSA ;gka ij crkuk izklafxd gS fd lhvksihVh ds iz’kqYd vkns’k fnukad 1 vizSy 2013 esa ykxr enksa ds

vuqekuu esa vuqer okf”kZd o`f) 6-5 izfr’kr gSA vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ds la’kksf/kr vuqeku #0 132-54 djksM+ o”kZ 2012&13 esa izfrosfnr okLrfod

vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr ls 6-6- izfr’kr dh o`f) n’kkZrs gSa tks 1 vizSy 2013 ds blds ekeys esa vuqer Lrj ls mPprj ik;k x;k gSA o”kZ

2013&14 ds fy, vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr fiNys iz’kqYd vkns’k esa vuqlfjr lexz n`f”Vdks.k ds vuqlkj o”kZ 2012&13 ds fy, izfrosfnr

okLrfod vkadM+ksa ls 6-5 izfr’kr dh o`f) Lohdkj djrs gq, lqfopkfjr fd;k x;k gSA rnuqlkj] lqfopkfjr la’kksf/kr vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr

lhvksihVh }kjk vuqekfur #0 132-54 ds LFkku ij #0 131-97 djksM+ gSA

Ok”kZ 2014&15 ds fy,] iRru us #0 151-23 djksM+ ds vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr dk vuqeku yxk;k gS tks o”kZ 2013&14 ds fy, lhvksihVh }kjk

vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr ds la’kksf/kr vuqekuksa esa 14 izfr’kr dh o`f) n’kkZrk gSA iRru us crk;k gS fd o”kZ 2014&15 ds fy, iRru pSuyksa ds

vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ds dk;Z dk VsaMj vHkh fd;k tkuk gS vkSj MhlhvkbZ lfgr laHkkoh cksyhnkrkvsa ds lkFk iRru dh ppkZvksa ds vk/kkj ij o”kZ

2014&15 ds fy, iwokZuqekfur fd;k x;k gS vkSj bls mEehn gS fd dher vkxs vkSj c<+sxhA iRru us crk;k gS fd 2014&15 ds ctV

vuqekuksa esa vuqekfur vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr #0 150 djksM+ ¼fcuk lfoZl VSDl½ gSA

pwafd gky gh ds lkekU; la’kks/ku ds nkSjku ftls 1 vizSy 2013 dks lekgkfjr fd;k x;k Fkk] izpkyu ykxr ds vuqekuu esa Lohd`r okf”kZd

o`f) 6-5 izfr’kr gS] o”kZ 2014&15 ds fy, la’kksf/kr vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr 1 vizSy 2013 ds vkns’k ds iz’kqYd vkns’k esa izpkyu ykxr ds

vuqekuu esa Lohd`r okf”kZd o`f) ds vuqlkj o”kZ 2013&14 ds la’kksf/kr vuqekuksa esa 6-5 izfr’kr dh okf”kZd o`f) Lohd`r djrs gq, o”kZ

2014&15 ds fy, la’kksf/kr vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr dks la’kksf/kr fd;k x;k gSA rnuqlkj] bl fo’ys”k.k esa lqfopkfjr vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr

ds fy, la’kksf/kr vuqeku o”kZ 2013&14 ls 2014&15 ds fy, #0 131-97 djksM+ vkSj #0 140-55 djksM+ gS tcfd rnuq:ih vof/k ds fy,

¹Hkkx IIIµ[k.M 4º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vlk/kj.k

lhvksihVh }kjk #0 132-48 djksM+ vkSj #0 151-23 djksM+ dk vuqeku yxk;k x;k gSA o”kZ 2012&13 ds fy,] vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr

lhvksihVh }kjk izksn~Hkwr okLrfod O;; ds gksrs gq, #0 123-92 djksM+ ij lqfopkfjr dh xbZ gSA

(viii)

fofHkUu xfrfof/k;ksa ds fy, vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr ds izHkktu dh la’kksf/kr fgLlsnkjh

fofHkUu xfrfof/k;ksa ds fy, vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr ds izHkktu dh la’kksf/kr fgLlsnkjh % % % %

(d)

fiNys iz’kqYd la’kks/ku ds nkSjku] lhvksihVh us vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr dks iksr lacaf/kr xfrfof/k ds v/khu iRru ns;rkvksa]

ikbyVst rFkk cFkZ fdjk;ksa esa vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr ds izHkktu ds vykok ihvks,y xfrfof/k esa o”kZ 2012&13] 2013&14 vkSj

2014&15 ds fy, Øe’k% #0 1570-96 yk[k] #0 1629-46 yk[k vkSj #0 1722-24 yk[k izHkkftr fd;k gSA ykxr fooj.k ls ;g

ns[kk x;k gS fd vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ds izHkktu dh izfr’kr fgLlsnkjh iksr lacaf/kr xfrfof/k ds v/khu rhu mi xfrfof/k;ksa ds

izR;sd ds fy, 29 izfr’kr ¼87 izfr’kr½ vkSj ihvks,y xfrfof/k ds fy, ‘ks”k 13 izfr’kr gSA

ekStwnk izLrko esa iRru }kjk nkf[ky fd, x, fooj.k esa] ;g ns[kk x;k gS fd iksr lacaf/kr xfrfof/k vkSj ihvks,y xfrfof/k ds

vf/khu mi&xfrfof/k;ksa ds chp vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr ds izHkktu dh fgLlsnkjh esa cnyko gSA ekStwnk izLrko esa nkf[ky fd,

x, ykxr fooj.kksa esa] iRru us iksr lacaf/kr xfrfof/k ds v/khu rhu mi xfrfof/k;ksa ds izR;sd esa dqy vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k dk

20-87 izfr’kr dqy 62-61 izfr’kr vkSj ‘ks”k 37-39 izfr’kr ihvks,y xfrfof/k ds fy, izHkkftr fd;k gSA

([k)

tc ihvks,y xfrfof/k ds fy, vf/kd vkcaVu gsrq Li”Vhdj.k ekaxk x;k Fkk rks lhvksihVh us Li”V fd;k Fkk fd iRru us vius

iwoZorhZ izLrko esa dsoy 2 fefy;u ?ku eh- ds fy, ihvks,y xfrfof/k gsrq vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr ij fopkj fd;k Fkk tks

MQfju IokbaV ls lhvksVh rd pSuy ds fy, FkkA blus vc lhvksVh rd vkarfjd pSuy ds ek/;e ls ckg~; igqap pSuy rd

gVk, tkus okys flYV dh lao/kZukRed ek=k ij fopkj djrs gq, ihvks,y xfrfof/k esa vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k O;; ds izHkktu dh ek=k

dks la’kksf/kr fd;k gSA iRru us o”kZ 2012&13 ds fy, ihvks,y xfrfof/k ds fy, vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr #0 4633-00 ds laca/k

esa foLr`r x.kuk,a Hksth gSa vkSj Li”V fd;k gS fd vfrfjDr :Ik ls gVk, x, flYV dh ek=k lhvksVh cFkZ ds fy, 6-9 fefy;u

?ku eh- gksrh gS tksfd fiNys lkekU; la’kks/ku izLrko esa ifjdfYir 2 fefy;u ?ku eh- ls vf/kd gSA rhu mi&xfrfof/k;ksa vFkkZr~

iRru lsok] ikbyVst rFkk cFkZ fdjk;s ds izR;sd esa izHkkftr la’kksf/kr vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr o”kZ 2012&13 ds fy, #0 2586-41

yk[k gS tksfd dqy feykdj #0 7759-23 yk[k gSA ;fn o”kZ 2012&13 ds fy, #0 4633-00 yk[k dh ihvks,y xfrfof/k esa

izHkkftr la’kksf/kr vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr tksM+h tkrh gS rks dqy vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr #0 12392-23 yk[k ifjxf.kr gksxh]

tSlk lhvksihVh }kjk Hkstk x;k gSA ;g okLrfod vk/kkj ij crk;k x;k gSA vuqorhZ nks o”kksZa ds fy, Hkh] la’kksf/kr vuqekfur

vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr izHkktu dh la’kksf/kr fgLlsnkjh ykxw djrs gq, iRru }kjk izHkkftr dh xbZ gSA

Ikksr lacaf/kr mi&xfrfof/k;ksa vkSj ihvks,y xfrfof/k ds chp vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr ds izHkktu dh fgLlsnkjh esa la’kks/ku ds fy,

dkj.k Li”V djrs gq, lhvksihVh }kjk izsf”kr Li”Vhdj.k ds en~nsutj vkSj ;g Hkh Lohdkj djrs gq, fd rsy ih,l;w vFkkZr~

chihlh,y] vkbZvkslh,y vksj ,pihlh,y ftUgsa iRru }kjk nkf[ky fd, x, ykxr fooj.k muds fVIif.k;ksa ds fy, vxzsf”kr fd,

x, Fks] lfgr fdlh Hkh mi;ksDrk us iRru }kjk la’kksf/kr vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr ds izHkktu ij dksbZ foijhr fVIi.kh ugha dh

Fkh] ,d vksj iRru lsok] ikbyVst] cFkZ fdjk;s ds chp vkSj nwljh vksj lhvksihVh }kjk vuqlfjr ihvks,y xfrfof/k ij vuqj{k.k

fud”kZ.k ykxr ds izHkktu dh la’kksf/kr fgLlsnkjh ij fo’okl fd;k x;k gS vkSj bl fo’ys”k.k esa lqfopkfjr fd;k x;k gSA

(x)

rnuqlkj] o”kZ 2012&13 ds okLrfod vkadM+ksa ij vk/kkfjr crk, x, #0 123-92 djksM+ dh la’kksf/kr vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr vkSj

mi;qZDr ¼[k½ eas ;Fkk Li”V lhvksihVh }kjk ihvks,y xfrfof/k ds fy, vkSj iksr lacaf/kr xfrfof/k ds v/khu iRru ns;rkvksa]

ikbyVst vkSj cfkZ fdjk;s esa bldk izHkktu bl fo’ys”k.k esa lqfopkfjr fd;k x;k gSA o”kZ 2013&14 vkSj 2014&15 ds fy,] 6-5

izfr’kr dk o`f) dkjd ykxw djus ls vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr ds vuqekuksa esa fd, x, la’kks/ku ds en~nsutj] iksr lacaf/kr

xfrfof/k ds v/khu rhu mi&xfrfof/k;ksa ds izR;sd esa izHkkftr vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr o”kZ 2013&14 ds fy, #0 2754-53 yk[k]

o”kZ 2014&15 ds fy, #0 2933-57 yk[k gS tcfd blds LFkku ij rnq:ih vof/k ds fy, lhvksihVh }kjk lqfopkfjr #0 2772-62

yk[k vkSj #0 3163-49 yk[k gSA ihvks,y xfrfof/k ds fy, izHkkftr vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr o”kZ 2013&14 esa #0 4934-15 yk[k]

o”kZ 2014&15 esa #0 5254-86 yk[k gS tcfd blds LFkku ij rnuq:ih vof/k ds fy, lhvksihVh }kjk lqfopkfjr #0 4937-00

yk[k vkSj #0 5633-00 yk[k gSA

(?k)

fiNys iz’kqYd la’kks/ku vkns’k ds nkSjku] chvksVh izpkyd ls vuqekfur jktLo fgLlsnkjh izkfIr;ksa dk 50 izfr’kr iRru ns;rkvksa]

ikbyVst vkSj cFkZ fdjk;s ls vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr dks iwjk djus ds fy, lqfopkfjr fd;k x;k Fkk tcfd blds foijhr iRru

}kjk 25 izfr’kr ij fopkj fd;k x;k FkkA vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr dks iwjk djus ds fy, jktLo fgLlsnkjh izkfIr;ksa ds vuqeku

fiNys iz’kqYd vkns’k esa bl izkf/kdj.k }kjk ;Fkk lqfopkfjr cuk, j[ks x, gSaA ihvks,y izgLru xfrfof/k ds lanHkZ esa] iRru us

fiNys iz’kqYd la’kks/ku izLrko ds lkFk&lkFk ekStwnk izLrko esa ihvks,y izgLru xfrfof/k dh vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr dks iwjk

djus ds fy, jktLo fgLlsnkjh izkfIr;ksa ds fdlh fgLls ij fopkj ugha fd;k FkkA ;g Lohdkj djuk gksxk fd ihvks,y xfrfof/k

dks vkcafVr vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr 12-5 ehVj ds of/kZr Mqcko dks cuk, j[kus ds fy, ihvks,y mi;ksDrkvksa dh fof’k”V ekax

dks iwjk djus ds en~nsutj gSA blfy,] jktLo fgLlsnkjh izkfIr dks ihvks,y izgLru xfrfof/kr ds fy, vuqekfur vuqj{k.k

fud”kZ.k ykxr ls izfr&lgkf;dh djus dh t:jr ugha gSA blfy,] ihvks,y xfrfof/k dh vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr dks iwjk djus

ds fy, jktLo fgLlsnkjh izkfIr;ksa ds fdlh Hkkx dks izHkkftr ugha djus dk lhvksihVh }kjk vaxhd`r n`f”Vdks.k gekjs fo’ys”k.k esa

Hkh cuk, j[kk x;k gSA

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY

[PART III—SEC. 4]

(ix)

dPps rsy vkSj ihvks,y ds fy, la’kksf/kr ;krk;kr vuqeku%

(d)

fiNys iz’kqYd la’kks/ku ds nkSjku] lhvksihVh us ewyr% o”kZ 2012&13 ls 2014&15 ds izR;sd o”kZ ds fy, 14 fefy;u ehfVªd Vu

¼,e,eVh½ ij ihvks,y ;krk;kr dk vuqeku yxk;k Fkk ftlesa ls iRru us cFkksZa ij 9-5 ,eVhih, vkSj 4-5 ,eVhih, ,lih,e ds

;krk;kr dk vuqeku yxk;k Fkk] tSlkfd vizSy 2013 ds vkns’k ds vuqPNsn la- 12(v)(d)(i) esa izfrosfnr fd;k x;k gSA

mlds ckn] iRru us 12oha iapo”khZ; ;kstuk ds vuqlkj ;krk;kr vuqekuksa dks la’kksf/kr fd;k Fkk vkSj lexz ihvks,y ;krk;kr

la’kksf/kr dj o”kZ 2012&13 ls 2014&15 ds fy, Øe’k% 14-40 fefy;u Vu izfr o”kZ ¼,eVhih,½] 16 ,eVhih, vkSj 17-23

,eVhih, fd;k FkkA tSlkfd vizSy 2013 vkns’k ds iSjk 11 (v) (d) esa mYys[k fd;k x;k gS] gekjs fo’ys”k.k esa] o”kZ 2012&13

ls 2014&15 ds fy, iRru }kjk izsf”kr ihvks,y dk la’kksf/kr ;krk;kr iRru }kjk ykxw dh xbZ dkxksZ dh izfr’kr fgLlsnkjh

vaxhd`r djrs gq, iRru cFkZ vkSj ,lih,e ds chp Øe’k% 32 izfr’kr vkSj 68 izfr’kr vuqikr esa izHkkftr fd;k FkkA

ifj.kkeLo:i] ,lih,e ij dPps rsy ds fy, #0 25 izfr Vu vkSj iRru cFkZ ij izgfLrr ihvks,y ds fy, #0 65 izfr Vu dh

?kkV’kqYd nj ykxw djrs gq, vk; vuqekuksa dks Hkh la’kksf/kr fd;k FkkA

iRru us EkkStwnk dk;Zokgh esa dgk gS fd ,lih,e dk ;krk;kr 9-5 ,e,eVhih, ls vf/kd ugha gks ldrk vkSj blfy, ,lih,e

ij dPps rsy ds fy, vk; dk vuqekuu o”kZ 2012&13 ls 2014&15 ds izR;sd o”kZ ds fy, 9-5 ,eVhih,y ij lhfer fd;k x;k

gSA bl lanHkZ esa] ;g crkuk izklafxd gS fd ekStwnk dk;Zokgh ds nkSjku] iRru us crk;k gS fd o”kZ 2012&13 esa izgfLrr lexz

dPps rsy vkSj ihvks,y ;krk;kr 13-90 ,e,eVhih,y gS ftlesa ls 10-06 ,e,eVhih, dPpk rsy ,lih,e ij izgfLrr fd;k

tkrk gS vkSj ihvks,y dk 3-84 ,eVhih, iRru cFkksZa ij izgfLrr fd;k tkrk gSA blds vykok] 1 vizSy 2013 ls 31 vDrwcj

2013 rd izFke lkr eghuksa esa izgfLrr okLrfod ihvks,y rFkk ,lih,e ;krk;kr 8-75 fefy;u Vu crk;k x;k gS ftlesa iRru

ds cFkksZa ij ihvks,y dk 2-37 fefy;u Vu vkSj ,lih,e ij dPps rsy dk 6-37 fefy;u Vu ‘kkfey gSA o”kZ 2013&14 ds izFke

lkr eghuksa ds fy, izgfLrr crk, x, ,lih,e ij dPps rsy vkSj iRru cFkksZa ij okLrfod ihvks,y ;krk;kr ;fn 2013&14 ds

iwoZ o”kZ ds fy, vuqeku yxk;k tkrk gS] ;g iRru cFkksZa esa ihvks,y dk 4-06 fefy;u Vu vkSj ,lih,e ij 10-92 fefy;u Vu

dPpk rsy ifjxf.kr gksxkA pwafd lhvksihVh }kjk izgfLrr okLrfod ;krk;kr n’kkZrk gS fd iRru us 9-50 ,eVhih, ls vf/kd

,lih,e ij dPpk rsy izgfLrr fd;k gS] blfy, lhvksihVh }kjk ;Fkk lqfopkfjr 9-50 ,eVhih,y ij ,lih,e ds dPpk rsy

;krk;kr dks lhfer j[kus dk dksbZ vkSfpR; ugha gSA

iRru cFkZ ij 3-39 fefy;u Vu ihvks,y ds fy, ihvks,y mRikn vkSj ,lih,e ij 9-5 fefy;u Vu dPpk rsy ls lhvksihVh

}kjk vuqekfur ?kkV’kqYd vk; o”kZ 2012&13 ds fy, iRru }kjk izgfLrr crk, x, okLrfod ;krk;kr ds vuqlkj ugha ik;k

x;k gS vkSj o”kZ 2013&14 ds fy, vuqekfur ;Fkkuqikfr ;krk;kr iRru }kjk izgfLrr okLrfod ihvks,y rFkk dPps rsy ds izFke

lkr eghuksa ij vk/kkfjr gSA

o”kZ 2012&13 ds fy, iRru }kjk miyC/k djok, x, okLrfod ;krk;kr vkadM+ksa ds en~nsutj] o”kZ 2012&13 ds fy, fiNys

iz’kqYd la’kks/ku vkns’k esa vuqekfur iRru cFkksZa ij ,lih,e rFkk ihvks,y ij dPps rsy dk ;krk;kr la’kksf/kr dj ,lih,e ij

10-06 ,e,eVhih, dPpk rsy vkSj iRru cFkksZa ij ihvks,y dk 3-84 ,eVhih, fd;k gSA o”kZ 2012&13 ds fy, iRru ds cFkksZa ij

,lih,e rFkk ihvks,y ij dPps rsy ls ?kkV’kqYd vk; ds vuqekuu esa Hkh rnuq:ih la’kks/ku fd;k x;k gSA

([k)

o”kZ 2013&14 ds fy,] ;g ns[kk x;k gS fd fiNys iz’kqYd la’kks/ku vkns’k esa ,lih,e ij dPps rsy dk ;krk;kr 10-88 fefy;u

Vu lqfopkfjr fd;k x;k gS tks o”kZ 2013&14 ds fy, lkr eghuksa ds okLrfod vkadM+ksa ds vk/kkj ij foifFkr ,lih,e ij

10-92 fefy;u Vu ds ;Fkkuqikfrr dPpk rsy ;krk;kr vuqeku ds cgqr djhc gSA blfy,] o”kZ 2013&14 ds fy, ,lih,e ij

dPps rsy ds ;krk;kr rFkk vk; vuqekuksa ds lanHkZ esa dksbZ la’kks/ku ugha fd;k x;k gSA

Ok”kZ 2013&14 ds fy, 10-88 fefy;u Vuksa ij lqfopkfjr ,lih,e ij dPps rsy dk ;krk;kr o”kZ 2012&13 esa izgfLrr 10-06

fefy;u Vu ds okLrfod ;krk;kr ls 8-15 izfr’kr o`f) n’kkZrk gSA mlds foijhr] vizSy 2013 vkns’k esa o”kZ 2014&15 ds fy,

vuqekfur ,lih,e ij dPps rsy dk ;krk;kr 11-72 fefy;u Vu o”kZ 2013&14 ds ;krk;kr vuqekuksa ls 7-77 izfr’kr dh o`f)

n’kkZrk gS tksfd rRdky iwoZorhZ o”kZ 2013&14 esa ,lih,e ij dPps rsy ;krk;kr esa vftZr o`f) Lrj ds vuqlkj gSA bl vkSfpR;

ij] ,lih,e dk dPpk rsy ;krk;kr fiNys iz’kqYd vkns’k esa ;Fkk vuqekfur o”kZ 2014&15 ds fy, 11-72 fefy;u Vu ij cuk,

j[kk x;k gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa] o”kZ 2013&14 vkSj 2014&15 ds fy, ,lih,e ls vk; vuqeku Hkh fiNys iz’kqYd vkns’k esa Øe’k%

#0 2420 yk[k vkSj #0 2929-10 yk[k ij ;Fkk vuqekfur cuk, j[kk x;k gSA

(x)

iRru us vius ekStwnk izLrko esa fuosnu fd;k gS fd lkekU; la’kks/ku izLrko esa vuqekfur ihvks,y ;krk;kr mPprj Lrj ij Fkk

vkSj bls de djus dk vuqjks/k fd;k FkkA vc nkf[ky fd, x, ykxr fooj.k esa] lhvksihVh us o”kZ 2013&14 vkSj 2014&15 ds

izR;sd o”kZ ds fy, ihvks,y xfrfof/k esa ?kkV’kqYd vk; ds vuqekuu ds fy, 3-5 fefy;u Vu izfro”kZ ij iRru cFkZ ij ihvks,y

;krk;kr dk vuqeku yxk;k gSA iRru us gekjs vuqjks/k ij 1 vizSy 2013 ls 31 vDrwcj 2013 rd o”kZ 2013&14 ds izFke lkr

eghuksa ds fy, iRru ds cFkksZa ij izgfLrr okLrfod ;krk;kr 2-37 fefy;u Vu izsf”kr fd;k gSA iRru cFkksZa ij ihvks,y ;krk;kr

2013&14 ds izFke lkr eghuksa ds fy, izgfLrr crk, x, okLrfod ihvks,y ;krk;kr ds vk/kkj ij 2013&14 ds iw.kZ o”kZ ds

fy, ;Fkkuqikr fu/kkZfjr fd, x, gSaA rnuqlkj] o”kZ 2013&14 ds fy, iRru ds cFkZ ij ihvks,y dk ;krk;kr 4-06 fefy;uVu

ij lqfopkfjr fd;k x;k gS vkSj mlls vk; #0 65 izfr Vu dh izpfyr ?kkV’qkYd nj ykxw djrs gq, #0 2639 yk[k ij

vuqekfur fd;k x;k gSA

(?k)

o”kZ 2014&15 ds fy, fiNys iz’kqYd la’kks/ku vkns’k esa vuqekfur ihvks,y ;krk;kr 5-51 fefy;u Vu rRdky fiNys o”kZ

2013&14 ds vuqekuksa 5-12 fefy;u Vu esa 7-6 izfr’kr dh o`f) nj n’kkZrk gSA mlds foijhr] 4-06 fefy;u Vu ij lkr eghuksa

ds okLrfod vkadM+ksa ds vk/kkj ij o”kZ 2013&14 ds fy, vuqekfur ;Fkkuqikfrr ihvks,y ;krk;kr o”kZ 2012&13 esa iRru }kjk

izgfLrr 3-84 fefy;uVu ds okLrfod ihvks,y ;krk;kr esa 5-7 izfr’kr dh o`f) n’kkZrk gSA ekStwnk izLrko esa lhvksihVh }kjk

¹Hkkx IIIµ[k.M 4º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vlk/kj.k

fd, x, fuosnuksa ds en~nsutj fd fiNys iz’kqYd vkns’k esa lqfopkfjr ihvks,y ;krk;kr mPprj Lrj ij gSa vkSj 2012&13 ds

iw.kZ o”kZ vkSj 2013&14 ds lkr eghuksa ds fy, foifFkr ihvks,y ;krk;kr esa okLrfod o`f) ij vk/kkfjr gS] fiNys iz’kqYd vkns’k

esa lqfopkfjr o”kZ 2014&15 ds fy, ihvks,y ;krk;kr dk vuqeku 5-51 fefy;u Vu la’kksf/kr fd;k x;k gS vkSj o”kZ 2013&14 esa

ihvks,y ;krk;kr esa vftZr 5-7 o`f) ykxw djrs gq, 4-29 fefy;u Vu ij lqfopkfjr fd, x, gSaA ifj.kkeLo:i] o”kZ 2014&15

ds fy, ihvks,y xfrfof/k ds fy, ykxr fooj.k esa vk; vuqeku Hkh la’kksf/kr ihvks,y ;krk;kr ij #0 65 izfr Vu dh

?kkV’kqYd nj ykxw djrs gq, la’kksf/kr fd;k gS vkSj #0 2789-42 yk[k ij vuqekfur fd;k x;k gSA

(³)

;g ns[kk x;k gS fd lhvksihVh us iRru cFkksZa ij ihvks,y ;krk;kr vkSj ,lih,e ij dPps rsy ds vuqeku dks de fd;k gS]

blus iksr lacaf/kr vk; esa rnuq:ih dVkSrh ugha dh gSA ihvks,y iksrksa dh la[;k esa dVkSrh ds ckjs esa iRru }kjk dksbZ C;ksjs

miyC/k ugha djok, tkus dh otg ls] ;g laHko ugha gS fd vuqekfur ihvks,y ;krk;kr esa dVkSrh dh otg ls iksr lacaf/kr

vk; esa dVkSrh mi;qDrr% fu/kkZfjr djuk laHko ugha gSA rFkkfi] Lohdkj djrs gq, fd iRru cFkZ ij ihvks,y ;krk;kr o”kZ

2012&13 ls 2014&15 ds fy, Øe’k% 17 izfr’kr] 21 izfr’kr vkSj 22 izfr’kr dVkSrh djus ds fy, vuqekfur fd;k x;k gS]

ihvks,y ;krk;kr ds vuqekuksa ij ekStwnk fo’ys”k.k fiNys iz’kqYd vkns’k esa fo’okl fd;k x;k Fkk ftldk iksr lacaf/kr vk; dks

de djus ij izHkko iM+k Fkk ijUrq mlh le; iksr lacaf/kr vk; esa dVkSrh dk vuqeku yxkus ds fy, visf{kr C;ksjs lhvksihVh

}kjk ugha Hkstus dh otg ls] o”kZ 2012&13 ds fy, 5 izfr’kr dh rnFkZ dVkSrh] vkSj o”kZ 2013&14 rFkk 2014&15 ds izR;sd o”kZ

esa 7 izfr’kr dks fiNys iz’kqYd vkns’k esa lqfopkfjr iRru ns;rkvksa] ikbyVst rFkk cFkZ fdjk;s ds vk; vuqekuu esa fy;k x;k

gSA

(x)

Åij fn, x, fo’ys”k.k ds vkyksd esa] lexz iRru ds fy, ykxr fooj.k vkSj fiNys iz’kqYd la’kks/ku vkns’k esa lqfopkfjr o”kZ 2012&13 ls

2014&15 ds fy, fofHkUu eq[; xfrfof/k;ksa@mi&xfrfof/k;ksa ds fy, la’kksf/kr fd, x, gSaA la’kksf/kr ykxr fooj.k vuqca/k&I ¼d½ ls ¼c½ :Ik

esa layXu fd, x, gSaA la’kksf/kr ykxr fooj.kksa ds lkjc) ifj.kke fuEufyf[kr gSa%&

Ø-lalalala-

fooj.k

izpkyu vk;

¼#0 djksM+ksa esa½

fuoy vf/k’ks”k@¼?kkVk½

¼#0 djksM+ksa esas½

fuoy vf/k’ks”k@¼?kkVk½ izpkyu vk; ds

izfr’kr :i esa

vkSlr

vf/k’ks”k@?kkVk

2012-

2013-

2014-

Total

2012-

2013-

2014-

Total

2012-

2013-

2014-

lexz lhvksihVh

367.10

417.07

467.88

1252.05

-91.14

-47.01

-10.28

-148.43

-24.83%

-11.27%

-2.20%

-11.86%

dkxksZ lacaf/kr

124.81

141.97

160.61

427.39

-40.98

-32.47

-21.88

-95.33

-32.83%

-22.87%

-13.62%

-22.31%

iksr lacaf/kr

195.43

227.33

258.61

681.37

-21.36

18.24

47.77

44.65

-10.93%

8.02%

18.47%

6.55%

laink

46.86

47.76

48.67

143.29

-28.80

-32.78

-36.18

-97.76

-61.45%

-68.63%

-74.34%

-68.22%

lexz lhvksihVh

laink vfrfjDr

320.24

369.31

419.21

1108.76

-62.34

-14.23

25.90

-50.68

-19.47%

-3.85%

6.18%

-4.57%

dkxksZ izgLru

lkekU; dkxksZ

25.98

30.74

35.27

91.98

-65.45

-64.97

-64.00

-194.42

-251.95% -211.39% -181.48%

-211.38%

ihvks,y

24.96

26.39

27.89

79.24

-35.90

-38.12

-40.50

-114.53

-143.82% -144.46% -145.21%

-144.52%

moZjd

4.52

4.67

13.71

0.86

0.54

0.37

1.77

19.10%

11.85%

7.94%

12.91%

,lih,e & ?kkV’kqYd

25.15

27.20

29.29

81.64

25.15

27.20

29.29

81.64

100.00%

100.00%

,Q-lh- isfj;kj

0.12

0.13

0.38

-0.62

-0.65

-0.66

-1.93

-519.14% -516.72% -505.70%

-513.63%

Hkj.k vkSj [kkyh djuk

1.56

1.64

1.72

4.93

-7.54

-7.83

-8.00

-23.37

-482.60% -476.87% -464.20%

-474.26%

jktLo fgLlsnkjh dk

50%

42.52

51.36

61.63

155.51

42.52

51.36

61.63

155.51

100.00%

100.0%

dqy

124.81

141.97

160.61

427.39

-40.98

-32.47

-21.88

-95.33

-32.83%

-22.87%

-13.62%

-22.31%

iksr lacaf/kr

iRru ns;rk,a

43.68

50.71

57.75

152.14

21.49

29.28

37.35

88.13

49.20%

57.74%

64.68%

57.92%

ikbyVst

77.23

89.66

102.11

269.00

-22.87

-12.29

-1.18

-36.34

-29.62%

-13.71%

-1.15%

-13.51%

cFkZ fdjk;k

41.87

48.61

55.35

145.83

6.14

13.48

20.90

40.52

14.66%

27.73%

37.76%

27.78%

‘kq”d xksnhdj.k

0.30

0.90

-0.32

-0.35

-0.37

-1.04

-106.90% -115.66% -122.44%

-115.0%

usg: ‘krkCnh

0.00

-36.39

-25.88

-25.74

-88.02

Tky vkiwfrZ &cktZ

0.75

0.78

0.82

2.35

-0.11

-0.10

-0.09

-0.30

-14.35%

-13.25%

-11.10%

-12.85%

ty vkiwfrZ & rV

0.16

0.17

0.49

-0.77

-0.81

-0.85

-2.43

-495.24% -497.81% -492.41%

-495.11%

,lih,e & ikbyVst rFkk

30.38

36.03

41.03

107.45

10.40

13.85

16.67

40.92

34.24%

38.43%

40.62%

38.09%

lqj{kk izHkkj

1.07

3.21

1.07

3.21

100.00%

100.00%

dqy

195.43

227.33

258.61

681.37

-21.36

18.24

47.77

44.65

-10.93%

8.02%

18.47%

6.55%

(d)

mi;qZDr fLFkfr ls ;g ns[kk tk ldrk gS fd o”kZ 2012&13 ls 2014&15 ds fy, lexz iRru gsrq iz’kqYd ds ekStwnk Lrj ij

vuqekfur foRrh; fLFkfr yxHkx &11-86 izfr’kr dk ?kkVk n’kkZrk gSA iwjh rjg ls] ?kkVk 1 vizSy 2013 ds iz’kqYd la’kks/ku

vkns’k esa vuqekfur #0 ¼&½ 72-50 djksM+ ds dqy ?kkVs ds foijhr #0 ¼&½148-43 djksM+ ifjxf.kr gksrk gSA 1 vizSy 2013 ds

iz’kqYd vkns’k dks ikfjr djrs le;] nks o”kksZa 2013&14 vkSj 2014&15 ds fy, vuqekfur ykxr fLFkfr ij fopkj djus dk

fu.kZ; fy;k x;k Fkk D;ksafd foRrh; o”kZ 2012&13 igys gh lekIr gks pqdk gSA ekStwnk izLrko esa ykxr fLFkfr dk fo’ys”k.k

djrs le; ;gh n`f”Vdks.k vc Hkh cuk, j[kk x;k gSA nks o”kksZa 2013&14 rFkk 2014&15 ds fy, fLFkfr rnuq:ih vof/k ds fy,

fiNys vkns’k esa iznf’kZr 0-29 izfr’kr ds vf/k’ks”k ds foijhr ¼&½6-47 izfr’kr vkSlr ?kkVk n’kkZrk gSA iwjh rjg ls] dqy ?kkVk

1 vizSy 2013 ds iz’kqYd vkns’k esa vuqekfur #0 2-67 djksM+ ds vf/k’ks”k ds foijhr #0 ¼&½57-30 djksM+ ifjxf.kr gksrk gSA

([k)

iwjh rjg ls] ,dy vk/kkj ij] iksr lacaf/kr xfrfof/k vizSy 2013 vkns’k esa vuqekfur #0 9-26 djksM+ ds dqy fuoy vf/k’ks”k ds

foijhr mDr nks o”kksZa ds fy, #0 66-02 djksM+ dk dqy fuoy vf/k’ks”k n’kkZrh gSA ;g igys vuqekfur 1-79 izfr’kr ds fuoy

vf/k’ks”k ds foijhr 13-59 izfr’kr dk vkSlr fuoy vf/k’ks”k ifjxf.kr gksrk gSA dkxksZ izgLru xfrfof/k rnuq:ih vof/k ds fy,

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY

[PART III—SEC. 4]

vizSy 2013 vkns’k esa vuqekfur #0 62-37 djksM+ ds dqy fuoy vf/k’ks”k ds foijhr #0 ¼&½54-35 djksM+ dk dqy ?kkVk n’kkZrh

gSA izfr’kr ds :Ik esa] vkSlr ?kkVk 1 vizSy 2013 ds fiNys iz’kqYd vkns’k esa vuqekfur 19-65 izfr’kr ds vkSlr vf/k’ks”k ds

foijhr ¼&½17-96 izfr’kr ifjxf.kr gksrk gSA

(x)

laink xfrfof/k ls lacaf/kr ykxr fLFkfr bl dk;Zokgh esa dksbZ cnyko ugha fd;k x;k gSA

(?k)

nks o”kksZa dh vof/k ds fy, laink xfrfof/k ds vykok lexz iRru ds fy, vuqekfur ykxr fLFkfr vizSy 2013 esa vuqekfur

#0 71-63 djksM+ vf/k’ks”k ds foijhr #0 11-66 djksM+ dk dqy vf/k’ks”k n’kkZrh gS vkSj rnuq:ih vof/k ds fy, vuqekfur izpkyu

vk; ds izfr’kr ds vuqlkj] fuoy vf/k’ks”k fiNys iz’kqYd vkns’k esa vuqekfur 8-59 izfr’kr ds vkSlr fuoy vf/k’ks”k ds foijhr

1-48 izfr’kr dk vkSlr ifjxf.kr gksrk gSA orZeku dk;Zokgh ds lkis{k 1 vizSy 2013 ds iz’kqYd vkns’k esa fo’okl dh xbZ ykxr

fLFkfr esa rS;kj fd, x, ykxr fooj.k esa nks o”kksZa 2013&14 vkSj 2014&15 ds fy, lexz fLFkfr esa #0 59-97 djksM+ ¼#0 71-63

djksM+ ?kVko #0 11-66 djksM+½ dk vUrj Åij fn, x, fo’ys”k.k eas Li”V fd, x, dkj.kksa ls fiNys iz’kqYd vkns’k esa lqfopkfjr

ykxr fooj.k esa fd, x, lek;kstuksa dh otg ls gS vkSj o”kZ 2013&14 rFkk 2014&15 ds fy, bldk izHkko laf{kIr :Ik ls uhps

rkfydkc) fd;k x;k gS%&

(#0 yk[kksa esa

#0 yk[kksa esa

#0 yk[kksa esa)

Ø-lalalala-

fooj.k

2013-14

2014-15

dqy

(i)

fiNys iz’kqYd vkns’k esa fo’okl fd, x,

vuqekuksa ds lkis{k vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr esa

o`f) dk izHkkoA

663.41

807.58

1470.99

(ii)

ihvks,y ;krk;kr ij vuqekfur dVkSrh ds ys[kk

ij ihvks,y ls ?kkV’kqYd vk; esa dVkSrh dk

izHkkoA

689.00

794.42

1483.42

(iii)

ihvks,y ;krk;kr esa vuqekfur dVkSrh ds ys[kk

ij iksr lacaf/kr vk; esa 7 izfr’kr dh rnFkZ

dVkSrh dk izHkko

1422.46

1619.86

3042.32

(iv)

dqy (i + ii + iii)

2774.87

3221.86

5996.73

(³)

vuqorhZ vuqPNsn esa ;Fkk pfpZr vuqeksfnr iRru ds cFkZ vFkkZr~ lhvksVh] ,uVhch rFkk ,lVhch esa izgfLrr ihvks,y mRiknksa rFkk

dPps rsy ds fy, izfr Vu vk/kkj ij fo’ks”k fud”kZ.k ysoh dh ‘kq:vkr ds lkFk ekStwnk dk;Zokgh esa] iRru dks lhvksVh esa

vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr dks iwjk djus ds fy, nks o”kksZa 2013&14 ¼1 uoEcj 2013 ls vkxs½ ls 31 ekpZ 2015 rd ds fy,

#0 22-14 djksM+ dk vfrfjDr jktLo vftZr gksxkA

bl vkns’k esa vuqeksfnr fo’ks”k fud”kZ.k ysoh ls izksn~Hkwr gksus dh laHkkouk okys jktLo ij fopkj djus ds ckn] o”kZ 2013&14 vkSj

2014&15 ds fy, dqy fuoy vf/k’ks”k vc rS;kj fd, x, ykxr fooj.k esa vuqekfur laink xfrfof/k ds flok; #0 11-66 djksM+

ls c<+dj #0 33-80 djksM+ gks tk,xkA ;g vizSy 2013 ds fiNys iz’kqYd vkns’k esa lqfopkfjr #0 71-63 djksM+ ds dqy jktLo

ds Hkhrj gksxk ftlesa bl izkf/kdj.k us 31 ekpZ 2012 dks ,DP;wfj;y ewY;kadu ds vuqlkj vkSj flok; laink xfrfof/k ds o”kZ

2012&13 ds fy, vuqekfur #0 46-37 djksM+ ds fuoy vf/k’ks”k ds en~nsutj Hkh vis{kk dh rqyuk esa isa’ku fuf/k esa #0 1273

djksM+ dh Hkkjh deh ds en~nsutj lhvksihVh }kjk ;Fkk izLrkfor rRdkyhu ekStwnk njeku esa ;FkkfLFkfr cuk, j[kus dk fu.kZ;

fy;k FkkA flok; laink xfrfof/k o”kZ 2012&13 ds fy, fuoy ?kkVk ekStwnk dk;Zokgh esa rS;kj fd, x, ykxr fooj.k esa

#0 62-34 djksM+ dh o`f) dk vuqeku yxk;k x;k gSA

tSlkfd igys crk;k x;k gS] vc rS;kj fd, x, ykxr fooj.k esa n’kkZ, x, ml ekeys ds fy, ?kkVs esa o`f) vFkok lexz

jktLo vf/k’ks”k esa dVkSrh of/kZr vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr vSj ihvks,y ;krk;kr esa dVkSrh dh otg ls gksrk gS vkSj ?kkV’kqYd

vk; esa ifj.kkeh dVkSrh rFkk iksr lacaf/kr vk; esa vuqekfur rnFkZ dVkSrh ds lkis{k fiNys iz’kqYd vkns’k esa fo’okl fd, x,

vuqekuksa ds lkis{k gSA ;gka ij nksgjkuk izklafxd gS fd lEiw.kZ dk;Zokgh vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr olwy djus ds fy, fof’k”V

iRru cFkksZa ij izgfLrr ihvks,y mRiknksa rFkk dPps rsy ds fy, fo’ks”k izfr Vu fud”kZ.k nj fu/kkZfjr djus ds lhfer iz;kstu ls

dh xbZ gSA lhvksihVh us ihvks,y ds fy, ekStwnk ?kkV’kqYd nj esa Å/oeqZ[kh la’kks/ku dh ekax dh flok; fdlh Hkh vU; iz’kqYd

en esa la’kks/ku dh ekax ugha dh FkhA ,slh fLFkfr esa] iRru cFkksZa vFkkZr~ lhvksVh] ,uVhch rFkk ,lVhch esa izgfLrr ihvks,y

mRiknksa vkSj dPps rsy ds fy, fo’ks”k izfr Vu fud”kZ.k ysoh fu/kkZfjr djus ds flok; 1 vizSy 2013 ds iz’kqYd vkns’k esa

vuqeksfnr njeku esa ;FkkfLFkfr cuk, j[kh xbZ gSA

(xi)

lhvksihVh us vius izpkyuksa dks okykjikne esa vkbZthVhih,y LFkkukarj.k ds lkFk D;w 8 vkSj D;w 9 esa 12-5 ehVj dk Mqcko O;ofLFkr

djus ds fy, iRru ds nkf;Ro dh rkjh[k vFkkZr~ 18 Qjojh 2011 ls iwoZO;kih izHkko ls ihvks,y ls ?kkV’kqYd nj esa o`f) dh ekax dh FkhA

blus ckn esa foRrh; o”kZ 2012&13 ls ihvks,y ds ?kkV’kqYd nj esa iwoZO;kih la’kks/ku dh ekax dh FkhA nksuksa rsy ih,l;w vFkkZr~ chihlh,y ,oa

vkbZvkslh,y us nj esa iwoZO;kih la’kks/ku ij vkifRr mBkbZ Fkh vkSj Hkkoh izHkko ls ykxw djus dk vuqjks/k fd;k FkkA ;gka ij mYys[k djuk

izklafxd gS fd 2005 ds iz’kqYd fn’kkfunsZ’k iwoZO;kih izHkko ls njksa ds vuqeksnu iznku fd, tkus dh vuq’kalk ugha dh Fkh] pwafd o”kZ 2012&13

igys gh lekIr gks pqdk Fkk] fiNys iz’kqYd la’kks/ku vkns’k ikfjr djrs le;] o”kZ 2013&14 vkSj 2014&15 ds fy, ykxr fLFkfr dk

vkf[kjdkj fo’ys”k.k fd;k x;k FkkA fo’ks”k izfr Vu fud”kZ.k ysoh ij igqapus ds fy, ekStwnk ekeys esa ;gh n`f”Vdks.k vuqlfjr fd;k x;k gSA

rnuqlkj] o”kZ 2013&14 vkSj 2014&15 ds fy, ihvks,y xfrfof/k ds fy, ykxr fLFkfr ij fopkj fd;k x;k gSA blfy,] o”kZ 2012&13 ls

iwoZO;kih izHkko ls fo’ks”k fud”kZ.k ysoh ds fy, vuqeksnu dh ekax dks Lohdkj ugha fd;k tk ldrkA

¹Hkkx IIIµ[k.M 4º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vlk/kj.k

(xii)

;gka ij mYys[k djuk izklafxd gS fd ihvks,y ds fy, ?kkV’kqYd nj esa Å/oeqZ[kh la’kks/ku dh ekax djus okyk lhvksihVh dk izLrko ihvks,y

xfrfof/k ls lacaf/kr ykxr fooj.k esa vkus okys ?kkVs dh olwyh ds fy, gS tks eq[;r% iksvks,y ;krk;kr ,oa iwoZorhZ vuqekuksa esa dVkSrh vkSj

iRru }kjk la’kksf/kr vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr dh otg ls gSA ihvks,y ds fy, la’kksf/kr ?kkV’kqYd nj ij igqapus ds fy,] iRru us ihvks,y

xfrfof/k ds fy, vuqekfur fuoy ?kkVs ds foijhr ,lih,e xfrfof/k ls vuqekfur lEiw.kZ fuoy vf/k’ks”k lek;ksftr fd;k FkkA

;gka ij mYys[k djuk izklafxd gS fd chihlh,y us nkok fd;k gS fd ,lih,e ds fy, 2003 esa lhvksihVh ds lkFk gLrk{kj fd;k x;k

,evks;w ,lih,e ij dPps rsy dh ?kkV’kqYd nj esa dVkSrh ifjdfYir djrk gS ;fn ,lih,e ij ek=k 9-00 ,eVhih, ikj djrh gSA mUgksaus

fVIi.kh dh Fkh fd gkykafd ,lih,e ij ek=k 9 ,eVhih, ls vf/kd gks pqdh gS] lhvksihVh us ,lih,e ij dPps rsy ds fy, ?kkV’kqYd nj esa

fdlh dVkSrh dk izLrko ugha fd;k gSA ;g mYys[kuh; gS fd bl dk;Zokgh esa iRru ihvks,y ds fy, izLrkfor la’kksf/kr ?kkV’kqYd nj ij

igqapus ds fy, ihvks,y esa ?kkVs ds foijhr ,lih,e xfrfof/k ls lEiw.kZ fuoy vf/k’ks”k dks igys gh lek;ksftr dj pqdk gS] ftls ihvks,y ds

fo’ks”k fud”kZ.k ysoh ij igqapus ds iz;kstu ls lqfopkfjr fd;k x;k gSA

(xiii)

2013&14 ds izFke lkr eghuksa ds fy, iRru }kjk izsf”kr ihvks,y rFkk dPpk rsy ds okLrfod ;krk;kr ls lacaf/kr lwpuk ls] ;g ns[kk x;k

gS fd lhvksihVh ukWFkZ cFkZ cFkZ ¼,uVhch½] lkÅFk VSadj cFkZ ¼,lVhch½ vkSj cksV Vªsu fi;j ij iRruksa cFkksZa esa ihvks,y mRiknksa dk izgLru

eq[;r% ,lih,e ij djrk gSA pwafd 12-5 ehVj dk of/kZr Mqcko dsoy lhvksVh esa gh cuk, j[kus dh vko’;drk gS] blfy, iRru ls

,lVhch rFkk ,uVhch rfkk lhvksVh ij lHkh ihvks,y dkxksZ ds fy, ,dleku :Ik ls ?kkV’kqYd esa izLrkfor o`f) olwy djus ds vk/kkj dk

vkSfpR; crkus dk vuqjks/k fd;k x;k FkkA

iRru us Li”V fd;k gS fd ihvks,y iksr ,uVhch rFkk ,lVhch esa dkxksZ mrkjrk vFkok p<+krk gS vkSj rc lhvksVh dks LFkkukarfjr fd;k tkrk

gS vkSj 12-5 ehVj ds of/kZr Mqcko dk ykHk izkIr djrk gSA blfy,] lhvksihVh us vuqjks/k fd;k gS fd cFkksZa & ,uVhch] ,lVhch vkSj lhvksVh

dks ,d i`Fkd Js.kh ds :Ik esa cjkcj ekuk tkuk pkfg, vkSj izLrkfor ?kkV’kqYd nj ,uVhch] ,lVhch vkSj lhvksVh ij izgfLrr ihvks,y ds

fy, ,dleku :Ik ls ykxw fd;k tkuk pkfg,A chihlh,y us bl fLFkfr dk leFkZu fd;k gS vkSj lgefr O;Dr dh gS fd la’kksf/kr

?kkV’kqYd nj ,uVhch] ,lVhch rFkk lhvksVh ij izgfLrr ihvks,y ds fy, ykxw dh tkuh pkfg,A

rFkkfi] chihlh,y us crk;k gS fd dqN futh i{k ihvks,y buiqV ds fy, ,llhch dk iz;ksx dj jgs gSa blfy, izLrkfor la’kksf/kr ?kkV’kqYd

nj ,llhch ij izgfLrr ihvks,y ij foLrkfjr vkSj ykxw fd;k tkuk pkfg, vkSj rsy ih,l;w ds fy, ,dleku O;ogkj gksuk pkfg,A

lhvksihVh us bl lanHkZ esa Li”V fd;k gS fd ,llhch ij iRru 12]000 ds vf/kdre MhMCY;wVh ds lkFk 9-14 ehVj Mqcko vkSj 16]000 dk

foLFkkiu miyC/k djokrk gS tksfd ,uVhch rFkk ,lVhch ij miyC/k lqfo/kk dh vis{kk cgqr de gSA iRru us vkxs ;g Hkh Li”V fd;k gS fd

,llhch ekVupsjh pSuy esa ?kkV dh vU; lkbM ij gSA ;g Hkh iqf”V dh xbZ gS fd ,llhch ij izgfLrr ihvks,y iksrksa dks lhvksVh esa 12-5

ehVj ds of/kZr Mqcko dk ykHk ugha feyrk gSA olwyh&;ksx; iz’kqYd ekpZ 2005 ds iz’kqYd fn’kkfunsZ’kksa ds [kaM 2-11-1 esa ;Fkk fofufnZ”V

miyC/k djokbZ xbZ lqfo/kkvksa ds lkFk ‘kq: fd;k tkuk pkfg,A iRru }kjk izsf”kr Li”Vhdj.k ds en~nsutj vkSj iz’kqYd fn’kkfunsZ’k fLFkfr dks

en~nsutj j[krs gq,] ;g mi;qDr vkSj vkSfpR;ijd ugha ik;k x;k gS fd ,llhch ij izgfLrr ihvks,y of/kZr iz’kqYd vnk djs tc os

lhvksVh esa of/kZr Mqcko dk ykHk ugha ys jgs gksaA blds vykok] chihlh,y ds lq>ko ls ,llhch esa izgfLrr ihvks,y ls

lhvksVh@,uVhch@,lVhch rd izfrlgkf;dh dk izokg vk,xkA ,slh fLFkfr esa] ,llhch esa izgfLrr ihvks,y rFkk dPpk rsy ,oa cksV Vªsu

fi;j iRru ds cFkZ esa izgfLrr ihvks,y ls fo’ks”k izfr Vu fud”kZ.k ysoh ij igaqpus ds fy, nk;js ls ckgj j[ks tkrs gSaA

(xiv)

lhvksihVh us ihvks,y ds ?kkV’kqYd nj esa ekax dh xbZ o`f) ij igqapus ds fy, o”kZ 2013&14 vkSj 2014&15 ds izR;sd ds fy, 3-50 fefy;u

Vu ds ihvks,y ;krk;kr ij fopkj fd;k gSA chihlh,y us o”kZ 2013&14 ds fy, 3-70 fefy;u Vu vkSj o”kZ 2014&15 ds fy, 3-90 fefy;u

Vu lhvksVh] ,uVhch rFkk ,lVhch ij ihvks,y ;krk;kr n’kkZ;k gSA rFkkfi] vuqekfur ;krkkr ds fy, chihlh,y }kjk vk/kkj ugha fn;k x;k

gSA bl fo’ys”k.k ds iz;kstu ds fy,] lhvksVh] ,uVhch rFkk ,lVhch ds fy, iRru }kjk izsf”kr izFke lkr eghuksa ¼vFkkZr~ 1 vizSy] 2013 ls

31 vDrwcj 2013½ ds fy, o”kZ 2013&14 ds fy, okLrfod ihvks,y ;krk;kr 2-317 fefy;u Vu iwjs o”kZ ds fy, ;Fkkuqikfrr fd;k x;k gS

vkSj 3-97 fefy;u Vu ij ,sls igqaps ;krk;kr ij fopkj fd;k x;k gSA o”kZ 2014&15 ds fy, bu rhu iRru cFkksZa dk ihvks,y ;krk;kr

2013&14 ihvks,y ;krk;kr vuqeku dks vk/kkj :Ik esa ysrs gq, vkSj 2012&13 ds okLrfod vkadM+ksa ls vf/kd o”kZ 2013&14 esa ihvks,y

;krk;kr esa vftZr 5-7 izfr’kr dh o`f) ykxw djrs gq, fu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k gSA ;gka ij mYys[k djuk izklafxd gS fd ihvks,y xfrfof/k ls

vk; vuqekuu iRru ds cFkZ ij izgfLrr lexz ihvks,y ;krk;kr ds lanHkZ esa fd;k x;k gSA tcfd] ihvks,y ds fy, fo’ks”k fud”kZ.k nj

fu/kkZfjr djus ds fy,] lhvksVh] ,lVhch rFkk ,uVhch dk izklafxd ihvks,y ;krk;kr lhvksihVh ds izLrko ds vuqlkj lqfopkfjr fd, x, gSaA

mi;qZDr fo’ys”k.k ds vkyksd esa] fo’ks”k izfr Vu fud”kZ.k ysoh ij igqapus ds fy, lqfopkfjr lhvksVh] ,uVhch rFkk ,lVhch dk ihvks,y

;krk;kr o”kZ 2013&14 ds fy, 3-97 fefy;u Vu vkSj o”kZ 2014&15 ds fy, 4-20 fefy;u Vu gSA fopkj djrs gq, fd vuqeksfnr fo’ks”k

fud”kZ.k ysoh vuqorhZ vuqPNsn esa Li”V fd, x, dkj.kksa ls 1 uoEcj 2013 ls ykxw dh xbZ gS] o”kZ 2013&14 ds fy, lhvksVh] ,uVhch rFkk

,lVhch ds fy, ihvks,y ;krk;kr 2013&14 ds ikap eghuksa vFkkZr~ uoEcj 2013 ls ekpZ 2014 ds fy, ;Fkkuqikr lqfopkfjr fd;k x;k gSA

(xv) (d)

lhvksihVh us ihvks,y ds fy, ?kkV’kqYd nj esa o”kZ&okj ifjdfyr o`f) o”kZ 2012&13 ds fy, #0 45-90 izfr Vu] o”kZ 2013&14

ds fy, #0 52-60 izfr Vu vkSj o”kZ 2014&15 ds fy, #0 84-78 izfr Vu gSA rnuqlkj] lhvksihVh }kjk izLrkfor ihvks,y ds

fy, la’kksf/kr ?kkV’kqYd nj o”kZ 2012&13 ds fy, #0 110-91 izfr Vu] o”kZ 2013&14 ds fy, 117-60 izfr Vu vkSj o”kZ

2014&15 ds fy, #0 149-78 izfr Vu gSA tSlkfd igys crk;k x;k gS] ihvks,y ds fy, fo’ks”k izfr Vu fud”kZ.k ysoh o”kZ

2013&14 vkSj 2014&15 ds fy, ykxr fLFkfr ds vk/kkj ij fu/kkZfjr dh xbZ gSA gekjh dk;Zokgh esa] o”kZ 2013&14 vkSj

2014&15 ds fy, ihvks,y xfrfof/k esa lesfdr fuoy ?kkVk fLFkfr o”kZokj fHkUu&fHkUu nj ifjdfyr djus dh ctk; lqfopkfjr

dh xbZ gSA tSlkfd igys crk;k x;k gS] o”kZ 2013&14 vkSj 2014&15 ds fy, #0 5649-10 yk[k ij vuqekfur ,lih,e

xfrfof/k ls dqy fuoy vf/k’ks”k iRru }kjk vuqlfjr n`f”Vdks.k ds vuqlkj nks o”kksZa 2013&14 vkSj 2014&15 ds fy, ihvks,y

xfrfof/k esa vuqekfur dqy fuoy ?kkVk ds izfr lek;ksftr fd;k x;k gSA

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY

[PART III—SEC. 4]

Lka{ksi esa] ,lih,e esa vf/k’ks”k ds lek;kstu ds ckn nks o”kksZa 2013&14 vkSj 2014&15 ds fy, ihvks,y xfrfof/k esa #0 2213-81

yk[k dk fuoy ?kkVk 1 uoEcj 2013 ls 31 ekpZ 2015 rd ihvks,y mRikn ds 5-85 fefy;u Vu ;krk;kr ckaVk x;k gS vkSj

,slk foifFkr #0 37-84 izfr Vu gksrk gS ftls #0 38@& izfr Vu esa iw.kkZafdr fd;k x;k gSA

([k)

iRru dk ekStwnk njeku iRru cFkksZa ij izgfLrr dPps rsy vkSj iRru cFkksZa ij izgfLrr ihvks,y mRiknksa ds fy, #0 65 izfr

Vu dh ?kkV’kqYd nj fu/kkZfjr djrk gSA iRru us ihvks,y ds fy, #0 65 izfr Vu dh ekStwnk ?kkV’kqYd nj dks la’kksf/kr djus

dk izLrko fd;k gSA iRru ls ;g irk yxk;k x;k gS fd ihvks,y ds fy, izLrkfor la’kks/ku ihvks,y mRiknksa ,oa lhvksVh]

,uVhch rFkk ,lVhch ij izgfLrr dPps rsy ls lacaf/kr gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa] iRru cFkksZa vFkkZr~ lhvksVh] ,uVhch rFkk ,lVhch ij

izgfLrr dPps rsy vkSj ihvks,y mRiknksa nksuksa ij vuqeksfnr fo’ks”k fud”kZ.k nj ykxw gksxhA

(x)

tSlkfd igys crk;k x;k gS] iRru us ihvks,y ds ekStwnk ?kkV’kqYd nj dks #0 65 izfr Vu ls la’kksf/kr dj o”kZ 2012&13 ls

2014&15 ds fy, Øe’k% #0 110-91 izfr Vu] #0 117-60 izfr Vu vkSj #0 149-78 izfr Vu djus dk izLrko fd;k gSA Lohdkj

djrs gq, fd fof’k”V cFkksZa vFkkZr~ lhvksVh] ,uVhch vkSj ,lVhch ij izgfLrr ihvks,y ij lao/kZd nj ykxw dh tkuh gS vkSj

,llhch rFkk vU; CkFkksZa ij izgfLrr ihvks,y ij foLrkfjr ugha fd;k tkuk gS vkSj ;g Hkh Lohdkj djrs gq, fd iznku fd;k

x;k vuqeksnu iRru dks eq[;r% of/kZr vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr ds ys[kk ij gksus okyh ihvks,y xfrfof/k esa ?kkVs dks iwjk djus esa

iRru dks leFkZ cukus ds fof’k”V iz;ktu ds fy, gS vkSj ;g Hkh Lohdkj djrs gq, fd chihlh,y rFkk lhvksihVh nksuksa us

Lohdkj fd;k gS fd ;g rc rd ds fy, varfje iz’kqYd O;oLFkk gS tc rd lhvksVh ij ihvks,y ;krk;kr o”kZ 2015&16 esa czsd

bou IokbaV ij igqap tk,xk] #0 65 izfr Vu ds ekStwnk ihvks,y ?kkV’kqYd nj ds lkFk vkesfyr djus dh ctk; lhvksVh]

,uVhch rFkk ,lVhch ij izgfLrr ihvks,y ij fo’ks”k izfr Vu fud”kZ.k ysoh vuqeksfnr djus ds fy, ;g mi;qDr ik;k x;k gSA

iRru cFkksZa ij izgfLrr ihvks,y mRiknksa vkSj dPps rsy ds fy, #0 65 izfr Vu dh ekStwnk ?kkV’kqYd nj ekStwnk njeku esa ;Fkk

fu/kkZfjr tkjh jgsxhA

#0 65 izfr Vu dh ekStwnk ?kkV’kqYd nj ds vykok] iRru cFkZ vFkkZr~ lhvksVh] ,uVhch rFkk ,lVhch ij izgfLrr ihvks,y rFkk

dPps rsy ds fy, fo’ks”k fud”kZ.k ysoh #0 38@& izfr Vu ij vuqeksfnr dh xbZ gSA iRru cFkZ ij ihvks,y rFkk dPps rsy ls

fo’ks”k izfr Vu fud”kZ.k ysoh ij igqapus ds fy, x.kuk,a vuqca/k&1¼p½ :Ik esa izsf”kr fd;k x;k gSA lhvksihVh }kjk ;Fkk izsf”k.k

x.kukvksa vkSj gekjs fo’ys”k.k esa lqfopkfjr la’kksf/kr x.kukvksa dk lkj uhps rkfydkc) fd; x;k gS%&

Ø-lalalala-

fooj.k

iRru }kjk vius i= fnukad 09&09&2013 }kjk izsf”kr

la’kksf/kr vuqeku

ekStwnk izLrko ds fy, lqfopkfjr vuqeku

2012-13

2013-14

2014-15

2012-13

2013-14

2014-15

nj ij igqapus ds fy, lqfopkfjr ihvks,y ;krk;kr

¼,e,eVh½

3.39

3.50

3.39

3.97

4.20

ihvks,y xfrfof/k esa fuoy ?kkVk

-3931.34

-4215.83

-5342.34

-3589.65

-3812.43

-4050.48

,lih,e xfrfof/k esa fuoy vf/k’ks”k

2375.00

2515.00

2720.00

2929.10

,lih,e xfrfof/k esa fuoy vf/k’ks”k ds lek;kstu ds

ckn ihvks,y esa fuoy jktLo ?kkVk ¼2&3½

-1556.34

-1840.83

-2967.34

-1074.65

-1092.43

-1121.38

ihvks,y ;krk;kr

¼gekjs fo’ys”k.k esa] 2013&14 ds fy, ihvks,y ;krk;kr

o”kZ 2014&15 ds fy, ;Fkkuqikr vk/kkj tek ;krk;kr

ij uoEcj 2013 ls vkxs lqfopkfjr fd;k x;k gS½

3.39

3.50

5.85

lhvksihVh }kjk fu/kkZfjr vfrfjDr ?kkV’kqYd ¼#0 izfr

Vu½A ¼gekjs fo’ys”k.k esa] iRru cFkksZa vFkkZr~ lhvksVh]

,uVhch rFkk ,lVhch ij izgfLrr ihvks,y mRiknksa

rFkk dPps rsy ls fo’ks”k izfr Vu fud”kZ.k ysoh dh

ukei)fr esa i`Fkd nj fu/kkZfjr dh xbZ gS ctk; blds

fd bls ekStwnk ?kkV’kqYd nj esa vkesfyr fd;k tk,A½

45.91

52.60

84.78

37.84

(#0 38-00 izfr Vu esa iw.kkZafdr)

mi;qZDr Ø-la- 6 ij vfrfjDr ?kkV’kqYd nj tksM+us ds

ckn lhvksihVh }kjk izLrkfor ihvks,y ds fy, la’kksf/kr

?kkV’kqYd

110.91

117.60

149.78

njeku ds vuqlkj tkjh j[kus ds fy,

ihvks,y gsrq ekStwnk ?kkV’kqYdA mlds

vykok] lhvksVh] ,uVhch rFkk ,lVhch

ij fo’ks”k fud”kZ.k ysoh ds :Ik esa #0

38-00 izfr Vu fu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k gSA

(xvi)

cFkZ ij Mqcko cuk, j[kus ds fy, iRru }kjk fd;k x;k O;; iksr lacaf/kr lsok gS vkSj igys mfYyf[kr vuqlkj fu/kkZfjr izk:Ik ds vuqlkj

iksr lacaf/kr xfrfof/k;ksa esa fy;k x;k gSA ekStwnk ekeys esa] rFkkfi] iRru }kjk fd, x, fuosnu ds en~nsutj fd ihvks,y mi;ksDrk vkSj rsy

ih,l;w bl ys[kk ij cks> dks ogu djus ds fy, rS;kj gS flok; iz’kqYd dh ek=k ij fookn ds] vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr dkxksZ C;kt ls

vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr olwy djus ds fy, lhvksihVh dks leFkZrk iznku djus ds lhfer iz;kstu ds fy, dkxksZ izgLru xfrfof/k ¼ihvks,y½

ds lkFk vfHkfpfg~ur fd;k x;k gS D;ksafd dkxksZ C;kt Hkh bl O;oLFkk ds fy, eatwjh ;ksX; gSA lko/kkuh ds mik; ds :Ik esa] ;g Li”V fd;k

x;k gS fd vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr dks dkxksZ izgLru xfrfof/k esa izHkkftr djus ds fy, fdlh vU; egkiRru U;kl }kjk ut+hj ds rkSj ij

m)fjr ugha fd;k tkuk pkfg,A lhvksihVh us lhvksVh esa of/kZr Mqcko dk ykHk vftZr djus okys ihvks,y dkxksZ mi;ksDrkvksa ls lao/kZukRed

iz’kqYd dh olwyh djus dk izLrko fd;k gSA blds en~nsutj vkSj Lohdkj djrs gq, fd rsy mi;ksDrk Hkh blds fy, lger gSa] ;g

izkf/kdj.k iRru cFkksZa vFkkZr~ lhvksVh] ,uVhch rFkk ,lVhch ij ihvks,y mRiknksa rFkk dPps rsy dk izgLru djus okys ihvks,y mi;ksDrkvksa

ls olwyh ds fy, lhvksihVh ds izLrko ij lgefr nsus ds fy, izo`Rr gSA

¹Hkkx IIIµ[k.M 4º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vlk/kj.k

bl ekeys dh dk;Zokgh ds nkSjku] dqN rsy mi;ksDrkvksa us lhvksihVh ls lhvksVh ij rRdky 12-5 ehVj dk Mqcko nksckjk ls ‘kq: djus dk

vuqjks/k fd;k Fkk vkSj 12-5 ehVj dk Mqcko cuk, j[kuk lqfuf’pr djus dk vuqjks/k fd;k FkkA lhvksihVh 12-5 ehVj dk Mqcko rRdky ‘kq:

djus vkSj ml Lrj ij cuk, j[kus ds fy, lger FkkA #0 38@& izfr Vu dh fo’ks”k izfr Vu fud”kZ.kysoh ds fy, iznku fd;k x;k

vuqeksnu bl ‘krZ ds v/khu gS fd lhvksihVh lhvksVh ij 12-5 ehVj Mqcko rRdky nksckjk ‘kq: djsxk vkSj ml Lrj ij cuk, j[ksxkA

(xvii) LkhvksihVh us crk;k gS fd rsy ih,l;w VSadj cFkksZa ds ek/;e ls iRru dks dksbZ lqfuf’pr ek=k dk opu ugha ns jgs gSaA blfy,] vfrfjDr

?kkV’kqYd nj ds ek/;e ls iwokZuqekfur lao/kZukRed jktLo mi;ksDrkvksa }kjk yk, x, ihvks,y dh ek=k esa vkSj dVkSrh dh fLFkfr esa vftZr

ugha fd;k tk ldsxkA bl fLFkfr ij fopkj djrs gq,] lhvksihVh us bl izkf/kdj.k ls vuqjks/k fd;k gS fd iwokZuqekuksa ds lkis{k ihvks,y

mRiknksa ds izgLru esa deh] ;fn dksbZ gks] dh fLFkfr esa Ik;kZIrr% iRru dks {kfriwfrZ ds fy, rsy ih,l;w dks mi;qDr funs’k tkjh djsA bl

lanHkZ esa] ;g Li”V fd;k tkrk gS fd bl izkf/kdj.k dk dk;Z egkiRru U;klksa ds ekeys esa 2005 ds iz’kqYd fn’kkfunsZ’kksa ds vuqlkj ykxr

tek n`f”Vdks.k dk vuqlj.k djrs gq, egkiRru U;kl vkSj ogka ij izpkyu djus okys futh VfeZuy }kjk miyC/k djokbZ xbZ lsokvksa ds

fy, iz’kqYd fu/kkZfjr djuk gSA bl izkf/kdj.k dks iRru ds jktLo esa deh dh fLFkfr esa iRru dks mi;qDrr% {kfriwfrZ djus ds fy,

mi;ksDrkvksa dks funs’k tkjh ugha dj ldrkA

(xviii) (d)

[kaM 3-2-8 ds vuqlkj] bl izkf/kdj.k }kjk vuqeksfnr njsa Hkkjr ds jkti= esa vkns’k dh vf/klwpuk dh rkjh[k ds 30 fnuksa ckn ls

izHkkoh gksaxhA vkiokfnd ekeyksa esa] njksa dk iwoZO;kih la’kks/ku izfrosfnr fd, tkus okys dkj.kksa ls Lohdkj fd;k tk ldrk gSA

iRru U;klksa dks la’kksf/kr iz’kqYd ykxw djus ds fy, viuh fcfyax iz.kkyh dks v|ru djus ds fy, iRru U;klksa dks le; fn;k

tkrk gS vkSj lHkh i{kksa dks vfxze lwpuk nh tkrh gSA ekStwnk ekeys esa] olwyh dk iz;kstu lhvksihVh dks rsy mi;ksDrkvksa ds

vuqjks/k ij [kpZ dh tkus okyh vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k ykxr olwy djus dh vuqefr iznku djuk gSA vuqj{k.k fud”kZ.k dh ykxr

ogu djus ds fy, lac) mi;ksDrk Hkh djkj esa gSaA blds ennsutj vkSj o”kZ 2012&13 dh ?kkVk fLFkfr ij fopkj djrs gq,] ;g

mi;qDr gS fd nj rRdky izHkko vFkkZr~ 1 uoEcj 2013 ls ykxw dh tk,A tSlkfd igys crk;k x;k gS] fo’ks”k nj ij igqapus ds

iz;kstu ls] o”kZ 2013&14 dk ihvks,y ;krk;kr 1 uoEcj 2013 ls lqfopkfjr fd;k x;k gSA tSlkfd igys crk;k x;k gS] fo’ks”k

nj ij igqapus ds iz;kstu ds fy,] o”kZ 2013&14 dk ihvks,y ;krk;kr 1 uoEcj 2013 ls lqfopkfjr fd;k x;k gSA ;gka ij

mYYks[k djuk izklafxd gS fd gkykafd vuqeksnu 1 uoEcj 2013 ls iznku fd;k x;k gS] 1 vizSy] 2013 ls 31 vDrwcj] 2013 rd

ihvks,y xfrfof/k esa lEiw.kZ fuoy ?kkVk #0 38@& izfr Vu dh fo’ks”k nj ij igqapus ds le; fy;k x;k gSA

([k)

iz’kqYd fn’kkfunsZ’k 3 o”kksZa dk iz’kqYd oS/krk pØ fofufnZ”V djrs gSaA bl fo’ys”k.k esa lqfopkfjr ykxr fLFkfr ekpZ 2015 rd gSA

blds vykok] blds njeku esa fu/kkZfjr vU; iz’kqYd enksa dh leh{kk ds lkFk bl iz’kqYd en dh leh{kk djuk mi;qDr gksxkA

,slh fLFkfr esa] 1 vizSy] 2013 ds iz’kqYd vkns’k esa bl izkf/kdj.k }kjk vuqeksfnr lhvksihVh ds blds njeku dh oS/krk ds lkFk

dks&VfeZuy cukus ds fy, ihvks,y izHkkj gsrq fo’ks”k fud”kZ.k ysoh dh oS/krk 31 ekpZ] 2015 rd fu/kkZfjr dh xbZ gSA

15.1. ifj.kkeLo:i vkSj mi;qZDr dkj.kksa ls] vkSj lexz fopkj&foe’kZ ds vk/kkj ij] ;g izkf/kdj.k bl ‘krZ ds v/khu iRru cFkksZa vFkkZr~ lhvksVh] ,uVhch vkSj

,lVhch ij izgfLrr ihvks,y mRiknksa vkSj dPps rsy ds fy, #0 38 izfr Vu dh fo’ks”k izfr Vu fud”kZ.k ysoh vuqeksfnr djrk gS fd lhvksihVh rRdky lhvksVh esa

12-5 ehVj dk Mqcko nksckjk ‘kq: djsxk vkSj mls ml Lrj ij cuk, j[ksxk vkSj ;g izkf/kdj.k v/;k;&III dkxksZ lacaf/kr izHkkj ds v/khu fuEufyf[kr vuqlwph 3-2-5

dk lekos’ku vuqeksfnr djrk gS%&

“3.2.5. lhvksVh] ,uVhch rFkk ,lVhch ij izgfLr

lhvksVh] ,uVhch rFkk ,lVhch ij izgfLr

lhvksVh] ,uVhch rFkk ,lVhch ij izgfLrr ihvks,y mRiknksa rFkk dPps rsy ds fy, fo’ks”k izfr Vu fud”kZ.k ysoh

r ihvks,y mRiknksa rFkk dPps rsy ds fy, fo’ks”k izfr Vu fud”kZ.k ysoh

(#0 esa)

Ø-lalalala-

fooj.k

bdkbZ

rVh;

fons'kh

iRru cFkksZa vFkkZr~ lhvksVh] ,uVhch rFkk ,lVhch ij izgfLrr ihvks,y mRiknksa

vkSj dPps rsy ds fy, fo’ks”k izfr Vu fud”kZ.k ysoh

izfr Vu

38.00

”

15.2. vuqeksfnr nj 1 uoEcj 2013 ls ykxw gksxh vkSj 1 vizSy 2013 ds iz’kqYd vkns’k esa bl izkf/kdj.k }kjk vuqeksfnr lhvksihVh ds njeku dh oS/krk ds lkFk

31 ekpZ 2015 rd dks&VfeZul oS/k jgsxhA

Vh-,l- ckyklqczg~e.;e] lnL; ¼foÙk½

[ foKkiu III@4@vlk/kkj.k@143@13]

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY

[PART III—SEC. 4]

TARIFF AUTHORITY FOR MAJOR PORTS

NOTIFICATION

Mumbai, the 3rd December, 2013

No.TAMP/41/2013-COPT .—In exercise of the powers conferred by Sections 48 and 49 of the Major Port

Trusts Act, 1963 (38 of 1963), the Tariff Authority for Major Ports hereby disposes of the proposal received from the

Cochin Port Trust for review of wharfage charges on the POL Products prescribed in its existing Scale of Rates

approved vide Order No.TAMP/49/2011-COPT dated 1st April, 2013 as in the Order appended hereto.

Tariff Authority for Major Ports

Case No. TAMP/41/2013-COPT

Cochin Port Trust

- - -

Applicant

QUORUM:

(i)

Shri T.S. Balasubramanian, Member (Finance)

(ii)

Shri C.B. Singh, Member (Economic)

O R D E R

(Passed on this 15th day of November, 2013)

This case relates to the proposal received by the Cochin Port Trust (COPT) for review of wharfage charges on

the POL products prescribed in its existing Scale of Rates.

2. The existing SOR of the COPT was approved vide Order No.TAMP/49/2011-COPT dated 1st April, 2013

which was notified in the Gazette of India on 10th June, 2013.

3.1. The COPT vide its letter dated 19 August 2013 has requested for review of the wharfage charges on the

POL products. In this connection, the submissions made by COPT are summarised below:

(i)

Cochin Oil Terminal (COT), North Tanker Berth (NTB) and South Tanker Berth (STB) handle POL

products including crude oil by PSUs like BPCL-KR, HPCL and IOCL at the rate of ` 65 per ton

since 1996-97 till date without any increase in the wharfage rates.

(ii)

After commissioning of SPM by BPCL-KR in the year December 2007, the quantity handled at COT

reduced substantially. The capacity utilisation of this dedicated facility reduced despite increase in the

refining capacity of BPCL-KR from 7.5 to 9.5 MMT per annum.

(iii)

As per MOU entered between COPT and BPCL-KR on 11th June, 2003, the port needs to maintain a

9.14m draft at COT. However, as part of the contractual obligation with M/s. India Gateway

Terminal Private Limited (IGTPL), the COPT has to maintain 12.5 m draft at berth Q8-Q9. As the

COT is in the same area as Q8 and Q9, the draft of 12.5 m was available at COT also. Thus, the

BPCL-KR and other oil PSUs enjoyed the deeper draft not only without incurring any additional cost

but also benefited by scale of economies of freight by bringing deeper drafted vessels and increased

parcel sizes.

(iv)

The container handling operations at IGTPL shifted to ICTT, Vallarpadam in February 2011.

Therefore, the obligation to maintain 12.5 draft at Q8 & Q9 came to an end. The port needs to

maintain only 9.14 m draft at COT and there was no justification for maintaining 12.5 draft as was

done, especially in view of the decreasing volumes at COT.

(v)

The port, therefore, decided to either scale down the draft to 9.14 m or review the cost statement of

Wharfage on POL Products. Since the overall vessel related income showed a deficit, a proportionate

cost of maintenance dredging was apportioned to the POL products. However, in the estimates

moderated by the Authority in the notification dated 10th June, 2013, the apportioned dredging costs

for POL products was not considered by the Authority. This resulted in surplus in the POL handling

activity for the year 2012-13 to 2014-15.

¹Hkkx IIIµ[k.M 4º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vlk/kj.k

(vi)

A meeting was held with oil PSUs in June 2013 to inform the desire of the port to lower the draft.

The oil PSUs desired that the 12.5 m draft at COT should be maintained and agreed to bear the

additional charges payable in this regard, provided such charges are approved by the Authority.

3.2.

The other points made by the COPT are summarised below:

(i)

The TAMP Guidelines allow review of orders to the limited extent of errors apparent on the face of

records considered in the relevant proceedings, provided such an application is filed within 30 days of

the notification in the Official Gazette vide Clause 3.3.1 of the 2005 Guidelines.

(ii)

This submission before the Authority is for review of orders for POL handling activity on account of

an extraordinary situation at the COPT as it is struggling with a serious deficit position in the activity

due to recurring expenditure on maintenance dredging without commensurate income.

(iii)

The financial performance of the port during the last seven years is tabulated below:

(` in crores)

Particulars

2006-

2007-

2008-09

2009-

2010-

2011-

2012-

Operating Income

212.08

219.94

208.40

232.07

276.08

307.10

311.61

Operating

Expenditure

147.57

181.20

195.46

232.95

274.49

282.14

367.39

Operating

Surplus/ Deficit

64.51

38.73

12.94

-0.88

1.59

24.96

-55.78

F & M Income

21.28

27.62

21.38

19.23

35.69

35.10

134.43

F & M Expenditure

59.13

61.86

49.07

107.61

123.36

143.98

143.80

Net

Surplus/

Deficit

26.66

4.49

-14.75

-89.26

-86.08

-83.91

-65.15

Operating

ratio

(%)

100

118

(iv)

The accumulated loss of the port as on 31st March, 2013 is `298.84 crores. It faces a revenue gap of

` 20 crores per month at present and has been utilizing its Pension Trust fund for payment of pension

from April 2013 onwards. Even then the revenue gap is around ` 7 to ` 8 crores per month.

(v)

Cochin Port is famed for its geo-strategically important location near the international shipping

channels; it is the Major Port nearest to these channels. Proximity to these routes is important as the

big ships plying these routes tend to touch only the ports requiring minimum deviation from the

route.

(vi)

Its geographical advantage comes with a geo-morphological disadvantage of heavy maintenance

dredging. At an annual siltation load of 21 million cu.m., the COPT has acquired the dubious

distinction of becoming the port with the maximum siltation load in India. Maintenance dredging has

thus been a major problem at the port.

(vii)

Most other ports in India have a hard rocky bottom, so that once the costly capital dredging is

completed, there is almost no siltation to deal with, which implies that there is no need for

maintenance dredging. But, Cochin Port has a muddy bottom, which is associated with siltation and

maintenance dredging.

(viii)

The method of pricing in the dredging contract in the COPT has been changed from ‘per cu. m. of silt

removed’ to ‘maintenance of draft of the channel throughout the period specified’, with effect from

2000-01. While this is a more effective method of providing depths, it tends to be more expensive as

it requires the contractor to maintain a dredger throughout the year unlike in other ports.

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY

[PART III—SEC. 4]

Particulars

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

2012-13

Dredging Quantity (M cu.m)

Maintenance Dredging Cost

( ` in crores)

56.83

66.22

84.37

63.72

123.92

Operating Cost ( ` in crores)

195.46

232.95

274.49

282.14

367.39

% to operating cost

29%

28%

31%

23%

34%

(ix)

Maintenance dredging expenditure as a percentage of operating cost is second only to Kolkata Port

Trust (KOPT), as the figures for 2010-11 below shown:

Kolkata

Cochin

Mangalore

Kandla

Paradip

Mormugao

Vizag

JNPT

MbPT

Ennore

Chennai

Tuticorin

(x)

The KOPT spends around ` 400 crores annually on maintenance dredging while the COPT has

contracted for maintenance dredging for 3 years with Dredging Corporation of India for around `105

crores + Service Tax per year. In 2012-13 Cochin Port spent ` 123.92 crores on maintenance

dredging. All other Major Ports spend less than ` 50-60 crores a year on maintenance dredging.

(xi)

There is, however, a cardinal difference between the treatment of maintenance dredging expenditure

in KOPT and COPT. Around 90% of the maintenance dredging expenditure of KOPT is funded by

Government of India so it does not have to recover from the port users whereas COPT does not

receive any subsidy for maintenance dredging and has therefore to recover it from Port Users.

(xii)

Expenditure on maintenance dredging is recovered by ports through Vessel Related Charges (VRC).

Hence the VRC at COPT is higher than that at other competing ports.

VRC for a Vessel with 14,036 GRT in various Ports for a 12 hour stay

VRC in USD

Cochin

Chennai

Tuticorin

JNPT

Mundra

Colombo

17162

8066

8361

5468

8379

2803

(xiii)

The port has to offer concessions on VRC to remain competitive. There are limits to which the VRC

can be further loaded with maintenance dredging expenditure. In the TAMP scheme of things, the

subsidy gets added back to the port’s revenue for assessment of the port’s revenue stress. It is

submitted that to this extent the port’s revenue stress gets understated, as it is actually VRC revenue

foregone or sacrificed.

(xiv)

On the other hand, there is scope for enhancing wharfage for POL, with oil companies paying much

higher rates at other ports as compared to COPT, as can be seen from the table below:

Port

Kochi

New

Mangalore

Mundra

Paradip

Kolkata

Kakinada

Ennore

Wharfage ( ` per

MT)

112.5

134

100

(xv)

The wharfage of `65 per MT for POL at COPT was fixed in 1996 before TAMP came into existence,

and is continuing unchanged even today. The rate should be ` 160 per MT even if it were adjusted for

WPI increases. Even if it were indexed to WPI increases to the limited extent of 60% as envisaged in

the 2008 Guidelines, it would have been ` 96 per MT today. But under the TAMP costing regime,

wharfage is continued to be prescribed at ` 65 per MT since 1996 as this activity is in surplus.

¹Hkkx IIIµ[k.M 4º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vlk/kj.k

COT, NTB & STB income in 2012-13 as per TAMP Guidelines:

( ` in crores)

Details

Income

Expenditure

Surplus/Deficit

Port Dues

3.07

30.35

-27.28

Pilotage

11.19

34.99

-23.80

Berth Hire

4.31

29.66

-25.35

Total (A)

18.57

95.00

-76.43

Wharfage (B)

22.00

6.87

15.13

Total income (A) + (B)

40.57

101.86

-61.29

(xvi)

Since the conventional approach adopted by the Authority would not permit an increase in wharfage,

COPT had made a submission as part of the General Tariff Revision for the current tariff cycle that

the tariffs need not be increased. However, the Authority is requested to consider an increase in POL

wharfage considering our financial situation.

(xvii)

There is nothing in the TAMP Guidelines, 2005 which require the maintenance dredging expenditure

to be recovered only from VRC. It is the cost formats circulated by TAMP which indicate that the

maintenance dredging expenditure shall be loaded only in the VRC and not in wharfage.

(xviii)

Given its peculiar circumstances, the port had consistently tried to load the maintenance dredging

expenditure in wharfage rather than in VRC in all its submissions to the Authority on SOR. The

Authority has, however, seen it fit to reject it each time. [In this connection, the COPT has

reproduced relevant extracts of 2007, 2010 and 2013 tariff order passed by the Authority on its

general revision proposal.]

(xix)

It is important to note the difference between impact and incidence in fixing tax rates as well as

regulated tariffs.

(xx)

Given that the ultimate incidence of the VRC and the wharfage for oil shipments vis-à-vis the port is

on the oil companies, the loading of maintenance dredging expenditure through VRC should not be

stressed too much. In fact, stressing for loading maintenance dredging expenditure only in VRC acts

to the detriment of the port as the VRCs are already un-competitively high whereas there is still scope

for increasing wharfage. It may be noted that the deviation from the general norm has already been

made by the Authority in the case of New Mangalore Port Trust.

(xxi)

The installation of the Single Point Mooring (SPM) by the BPCL in December 2007 impacted

COPT’s finances decisively. Wharfage at the SPM is ` 25 per MT while that at the inner berths

(COT, NTB and STB) is ` 65 per MT. The SPM diverted all the crude throughput there. The Port’s

oil revenues took 4 years to cross the 2006-07 level of ` 90.95 crores again, and it was only in 2011-

12 that the oil revenues, at ` 103.75 crores, exceeded the 2006-07 level. Even though crude and

POL products constitute 70% of the Port’s traffic, only one-third of the Port’s revenues are now

generated from this business as against 43% before, as the figures below show:

Oil Revenue of Cochin Port Trust

(` in crores)

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

2012-13

COT

65.68

58.39

19.21

26.07

24.9

31.39

23.5

NTB

17.67

12.37

10.89

12.68

16.48

14.37

13.58

STB

7.6

7.04

1.44

2.77

2.6

5.85

3.47

SPM

5.95

40.18

19.39

46.22

52.34

63.26

Total

90.95

83.75

71.72

60.91

90.20

103.75

103.81

Operating

income

212.08

220.09

208.4

232.07

276.08

307.75

311.61

% of share

43%

38%

34%

26%

33%

34%

33%

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY

[PART III—SEC. 4]

(xxii)

When crude throughput migrated from the COT to the SPM, capacity utilization at the COT plunged

to 26%, with expenditure on the terminal grossly exceeding revenues when maintenance dredging is

considered. But BPCL, which does 87% of the throughput at the COT even now, still wants 12.5m

draft at COT. Hence the ground on which the Authority has allowed loading maintenance dredging

expenditure in wharfage in the SOR of 2007, continues to be valid even today for the present tariff

cycle.

Oil Throughput at COT Before and After SPM in COPT

Year

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

2012-13

Throughput in MMT

7.52

6.57

2.2

2.22

2.7

1.93

Capacity Utilisation

100%

87%

29%

30%

36%

26%

Income from COT ( `

in crores)

65.68

58.39

19.21

26.07

24.9

31.39

23.5

(xxiii)

COPT kept maintaining 12.5m draft at COT even after the commissioning of the SPM since the Port

was contractually obligated through a Licence Agreement with the container terminal operator, DP

World, to maintain 12.5m draft at the container berths, Q8 and Q9 berths, which were in the same

area as that of COT.

(xxiv)

The draft of 12.5m at COT has been gainfully utilised by the oil companies, especially BPCL. Out of

the combined throughput of 3.39 MMT of POL at the Tanker berths (COT, NTB & STB) in 2012-13,

1.31 MMT was taken in vessels with draft more than 9.14m. The corresponding figure in 2011-12

was 2.59 MMT out of 4.32 MMT. The gain to the oil companies on account of freight advantage,

assuming a $3 freight advantage per MT, could be `19.65 crores (1.31*3*50/$) in 2012-13 and

` 38.85 crores (2.59*3*50/$) in 2011-12. That the oil companies, especially BPCL, require the draft

of 12.5 m at COT is evident from the above. BPCL has been requesting the COPT to continue the

draft of 12.5m. at the COT. The COPT has agreed to do so provided the oil companies pay additional

wharfage for the deeper draft.

(xxv)

It is submitted that COPT did not apportion any cost on such provision of higher draft at the COT,

even though BPCL and other oil companies utilized the higher draft to bring larger parcel size vessels

and availed the consequential scale economies till 2011. COPT’s obligation to maintain 12.5 m draft

at Q8 - Q9 berth ceased when the container terminal operations shifted to the ICTT, Vallarpadam in

February, 2011. Any expenses on maintaining the higher draft at COT are now solely attributable to

the POL operations at COT.

(xxvi)

It may be noted that the present move of COPT is by no means an afterthought. Within 3 weeks of

the container operations moving from RGCT on Q8 - Q9 berth to ICTT on Vallarpadam, COPT

addressed BPCL to pay `15 crores towards maintenance dredging expenditure for 2011-12 required

to keep the draft at COT at 12.5m; there was no reply at that time.

(xxvii) In 2012-13 the Port spent `46.33 crores of the total `123.92 crores on maintenance dredging, to

maintain 12.5m draft at the COT. When maintenance dredging is considered in the cost, it is clear

that the Port is making a loss on its operations at COT.

(xxviii) 87% of the throughput at COT is attributable to BPCL, but they do not want to take up responsibility

of guaranteeing a minimum throughput there. However, there does seem to be acknowledgement by

BPCL of the fact that utilisation of the COT has fallen to 26% of the 2006-07 levels, and that there is

a revenue gap for the terminal which needs to be covered.

(xxix)

But BPCL also wants the Port to use any surplus it is making in the SPM operations to cross-

subsidise the COT. BPCL points to the condition in the MOU with COPT which provides that once

throughput at the SPM reaches 9 MMT, there will be negotiations for a downward revision in the

wharfage of ` 25 per MT there. The 9 MMT throughput point at the SPM was breached in 2012-13

for the first time. [With reference to the financial position of the COPT for the years 2007-08 to

2014-15, the COPT has furnished the extracts of the relevant pages of the 2007, 2010 and 2013 tariff

order of its general revision proposal.]

(xxx)

To compound matters, the revised traffic projections and the consequential income estimates relied

upon in the General Revision Order for SOR in 2013 have turned out to be gross overestimates.

Unrealistically high traffic projections lead to lower tariff and under-recovery of costs, leading to

ultimate financial instability; hence it is urged to the Hon’ble Authority to re-work the tariffs based

¹Hkkx IIIµ[k.M 4º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vlk/kj.k

on realistic traffic data. The port has made the following submissions regarding traffic projection of

POL:

(a)

The Port initially projected (in June 2012) a steady crude and POL throughput of 14 MMT

for the years 2012-13, 2013-14 and 2014-15, of which 9.5 MMT was estimated to be

handled at the SPM and 4.5 MMT at the berths.

(b)

Since the proportion of the throughput at the SPM and the Docks worked out to be 68% and

32% respectively, this ratio was applied by the TAMP on the revised POL traffic estimates

furnished by Cochin Port (in Aug 2012) at 14.40, 16.00 and 17.23 MMT for the years 2012-

13 to 2014-15 to ascertain the share of estimated POL traffic at the SPM and the berths for

the purpose of estimation of income. Accordingly, the revised traffic estimates considered

by the Authority to ascertain the income estimate is as below:

Year

Traffic estimates (in MMT)

Income estimates (` in laths)

SPM

(68%)

Other

Berths

(32%)

Total traffic

estimates

SPM

Other

berths

Total

2012-13

9.79

4.61

14.40

2448.00

2995.20

5443.20

2013-14

10.88

5.12

16.00

2720.00

3328.00

6048.00

2014-15

11.72

5.51

17.23

2929.10

3583.84

6512.94

(xxxi)

(a)

Adoption of the ratio resulted in the throughput at the berths at 4.61, 5.12 and 5.51 MMT for

the years 2012-13 to 2014-15. The corresponding traffic at the SPM became 9.79, 10.88 and

11.72 MMT respectively for the aforesaid years. It is submitted that the crude oil import at

the SPM cannot exceed the present refining capacity of 9.5 MMTPA in any significant

manner until the BPCL’s Kochi Refinery expands its refining capacity, expected in 2016-17.

The case is no different for the POL handling at the berths also, since POL is more or less

captive, fully controlled by the oil companies, especially BPCL.

(b)

The reason behind the revised traffic projections by Cochin Port Trust, however, was the

expected commissioning of certain projects such as the Multi-User Liquid Terminal

(MULT) and the LPG Terminal, both of which did not materialize as projected in the Five

Year Plan. In fact, the MULT and the LPG Terminal are now being combined through a PPP

project under nomination to the IOCL, and expected to be commissioned at the end of the

current Tariff Cycle only.

(c)

In fact, the realized throughput of POL at Cochin Port in 2012-13 has been only 13.90 MMT

of which the SPM accounted for 10.06 MMT. For the current year 2013-14 (Apr-Jul), the

POL throughput is 4.92 MMT of which the SPM share is 3.45 MMT. The combined income

estimates at the SPM and the berths thus became ` 54.43, 60.48 and 65.13 crores for the

years 2012-13, 2013-14 and 2014-15 against the initial estimate of `53 crores per year for all

the aforesaid years. It is submitted that the POL wharfage income for 2012-13 turned out to

be only ` 48.01 crores considering both the SPM and the Docks.

(xxxii) The ratio of POL cargo estimated by the COPT in its initial general revision proposal at SPM and

other berths was in the ratio of 68% and 32%. TAMP applied the same ratio on the revised cargo

estimates of POL furnished by port in August 2012 and bifurcated at the cargo estimate at SPM and

other berths.

(xxxiii) It is submitted that an essential part of the above approach would be to allow the ports to price their

services at the rate ‘what the traffic can bear’. Only by extending the greatest latitude will a port such

as COPT in its present state, weighed down by heavy maintenance dredging expenditure, and without

the benefit of any subsidy or budgetary support from Government of India, be able to find some

semblance of financial viability.

(xxxiv) While the COPT already has an extremely high VRC on account of bearing the brunt of recovery of

maintenance dredging expenditure and that further increases in VRC are not feasible for recovery of

the increasing maintenance dredging expenditure, we have also shown that the traffic is willing to

bear a higher wharfage for POL should the Authority issue an award for the same, as ports like

Ennore and Kakinada are charging ` 100 per MT and `134 per MT respectively, compared to the ` 65

per MT fixed in the case of COPT as far back as in 1996.

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY

[PART III—SEC. 4]

(xxxv) The Authority is requested to consider a wharfage for POL fully loading the maintenance dredging

expenditure necessary for the 12.5m. draft at the COT which BPCL has desired. Such an approach

has been taken by the Hon’ble Authority in respect of the New Mangalore Port, as it has observed in

the Order of 2007.

(xxxvi) While it is clear that the charges are fixed on a cost plus return approach as required under the 2005

Guidelines, a uniform tariff for the cargo not availing significantly enhanced facilities through

increased draft, i.e., at STB & NTB which continue to operate at 9.14m. draft, may seem unfair at

first glance. But a uniform wharfage for POL at all the inner tanker berths is recommended because

the oil companies frequently get a vessel to load at the lower draft terminal and then top up at the

higher draft COT. The predominance of BPCL on account of its Kochi Refinery in the POL

throughput of COPT, which imports crude oil through the SPM and arranges for the movement of

refined products through the tanker berths, is another reason for proposing a uniform wharfage for

POL at all inner tanker berths.

(xxxvii) The COPT has also prayed for retrospective fixation of this rate of wharfage with effect from

18-2-2011, being the date on which container handling activities migrated from Willingdon Island to

Vallarpadam, thus ending the Port’s need to maintain the draft at 12.5m. in that area. In doing so, it

is reminded to the Authority that the BPCL would still be free-riding on the benefit of 12.5m. draft

from 2006 to 2011 without paying a single rupee over and above the `65 per MT wharfage which

imposed an obligation on the COPT of maintaining only a 9.14 m draft at COT.

(xxxviii)The COPT is mindful of the sensitivities of BPCL in the matter, that any surpluses made by the Port

at the SPM must be used to cross-subsidise the maintenance of a deeper draft at the COT. Therefore,

only the net revenue gap in the crude and POL operation after providing for the surpluses at the SPM

has been taken in computing the additional wharfage warranted for the COT.

(xxxix) The computations show that despite the Port’s request for payment of `15 crores in 2011-12 towards

maintenance dredging expenditure for the deeper draft at COT, COPT is not entitled to additional

wharfage for that year when the surplus from SPM is considered. However, no refund or adjustment

of surplus revenue for that year by COPT is warranted as the throughput of 9 MMT at the SPM upto

which the MOU stipulates a wharfage of ` 25 per MT, was not breached in the year.

(xL)

Based on the above submission, it has requested to approve additional wharfage on POL

retrospectively from 18 February 2011 i.e. from the date the container handling activities migrated

from Willingdon Island to Vallarpadam of ` 45.90 PMT for 2012-13, ` 52.60 PMT for 2013-14 and

` 84.78 PMT for 2014-15 after adjusting the wharfage from the SPM. Thus, the total wharfage

requested for approval for the years 2012-13 to 2014-15 is `110.90 PMT, `117.60 PMT and `149.78

PMT respectively. The gist of the cost statement furnished by the COPT for POL handling is

tabulated below:

( ` in lakhs)

Particulars

Actuals

Estimates

2011-12

2012-13

2013-14

2014-15

Cost

3979.09

5811.74

6224.49

7117.32

ROCE

222.51

319.41

266.34

500.02

Total cost

4201.60

6131.156

6490.83

7617.34

Rate per ton in `

97.26

180.86

185.45

217.64

Less: Existing Wharfage in `

65.00

Additional Wharfage

32.26

115.86

120.45

152.64

Net Surplus / Deficit

-1399.60

-3931.15

-4215.83

-5342.34

SPM- Wharfage

2229.10

2375.00

Net Revenue Gap after considering SPM

wharfage

829.50

-1556.15

-1840.83

-2967.34

Additional Wharfage (` per tonne)

-19.20

45.90

52.60

84.78

(xLi)

Retrospective fixation of the wharfage will not lead to any confusion or insurmountable difficulties in

recovery from the oil companies, as inner tanker berths are patronised almost wholly by the oil

¹Hkkx IIIµ[k.M 4º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vlk/kj.k

companies to the extent that they are almost captive facilities, albeit without the benefit of MGTs for

the Port.

(xLii)

The COPT has prayed to the Authority to issue orders as above at the earliest, so that the Port is able

to provide the oil companies the draft they require at the terminal, without suffering losses, and the

national interest is subserved by both the Port and the Port Users bringing out the best in each other.

(xLiii) (a)

The existing wharfage of ` 65 PMT for POL is proposed to increase as follows:

Year

2011-12

2012-13

2013-14

2014-15

Revised Wharfage proposed for

POL handling activity (per MT)

45.80

(Reduction

proposed)

110.90

117.60

149.78

(b).

The

COPT

has

proposed

the

increase

with

retrospective

effect

from

18 February 2011 i.e. the date on which container handling activities migrated to

Vallarpadam.

4. While acknowledging the proposal, the COPT was requested vide our letter dated 4 September 2013 to furnish

information on a few points latest by 13 September 2013, which emerged on a preliminary scrutiny of the proposal.

The COPT vide its letter dated 9 September 2013 has furnished its reply. A summary of the information sought by us

and reply furnished by COPT thereon are tabulated below:

Sl. No.

Information sought by us

Reply furnished by COPT

(i)

Maintenance

dredging

cost

estimated by the COPT for

POL activity in last Order was

`1570.96 lakhs in 2012-13,

`1629.46 lakhs in 2013-14 and

`1722.24 lakhs in 2014-15. As

against that COPT has now in

the instant proposal estimated

the maintenance dredging cost

at `4633.00 lakhs in 2012-13,

`4937.00 lakhs in 2013-14 and

`5633.00 lakhs in the year

2014-15. The reasons / basis for

modification in the estimation

of maintenance dredging cost

for POL may be furnished, with

justification for the increased

level of estimation.

As already mentioned in the proposal, the port has been incurring

heavy expenditure on maintenance dredging when compared to

other Major Ports. Port is not getting funded by Government of

India. So, the amount has to be recovered through the tariff by the

port.

The Oil PSUs are insisting on maintenance of 12.5m draft at COT

so that they can bring bigger vessels and take out bigger parcels for

getting economies of scale in transportation.

When the port submitted the proposal for the last general tariff

revision in 2011, the port had allocated `1570.96 lakhs, `1629.46

lakhs and `1722.24 lakhs for the years 2012-13, 2013-14 and 2014-

15 respectively, being the portion of dredging cost for maintaining

12.5m draft at COT. However, this cost was taken for only the

quantity of 2 million cu.m. which was for the channel from

Dufferin Point to COT.

It was thereafter pointed out in internal discussions that the correct

method of apportioning the maintenance dredging expenditure for

ensuring 12.5m draft at COT would be to consider the incremental

quantity of silt to be removed from outer approach channel through

the inner channel upto COT, and it is seen that the quantity of silt

additionally removed in this regard comes to 6.9 million cu.m (3.8

million cu.m and 3.1 million cu.m for outer and inner channels).

Based on the terms in the existing contract with the Dredging

Corporation of India Ltd., the cost attributable is worked out as

`46.33 crores for 2012-13, `49.37 crores for 2013-14 and similarly

`56.33 crores for 2014-15.

(ii)

The instant proposal of COPT

will also have an impact on the

overall cost position of the port

as well as in the cost statements

of cargo related activities and

vessel

activities

considered in the last tariff

revision

approved

the

Authority

vide

Order

The port has reworked and furnished activity-wise cost statements

for cargo, vessel related, estate activity and also consolidated cost

statement for the period from 2012-13 to 2013-14. The port has

also furnished the sub-activity-wise cost statements under the cargo

and vessel related activity.

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY

[PART III—SEC. 4]

No.TAMP/49/2011-COPT

dated 1 April 2013. The COPT

has furnished cost statement

only for the POL activity. The

COPT is, therefore, requested

to furnish activity-wise cost

statements for cargo related and

vessel

well

consolidated cost statement for

the

port

whole

prescribed formats for the year

2012-13, 2013-14 and 2014-15.

(iii)

Please

furnish

additional

revenue

likely

accrue

yearwise due to the proposed

increase

the

wharfage

charges along with detailed

working.

The estimated additional revenue likely to accrue to the port due to

the proposed increase in the wharfage charges is furnished below:

Sl.

No.

Description

2012-13

(Actual)

2013-14

(Projection)

2014-15

(Projection)

POL

cargo

traffic (Million

MT)

3.39

3.50

Additional

wharfage rate

(` per tonne)

45.90

52.60

84.78

Additional

revenue

from

wharfage (` in

crores)

15.56

18.41

29.67

The COPT has furnished detailed cost statement. It may be noted

that the additional wharfage proposed is arrived at after considering

the wharfage revenue at SPM.

It may be noted that the traffic projection for 2013-14 and 2014-15

are indicative and there have been fluctuations in the volume of

POL handled at the port in the recent years as shown in the table

below:

(in Million Metric Tons)

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

2012-13

3.40

3.84

3.67

4.32

3.39

The Oil PSUs are not committing any assured volume to the port

through tanker berths. Hence, the incremental revenue projected

through additional wharfage rate may not be achieved in the event

of further reduction in the volume of POL brought by the users.

Considering this fact, TAMP may kindly issue appropriate direction

to Oil PSUs to compensate the port adequately in the event of

shortfall, if any, in handling of POL products vis-à-vis the

projections.

TAMP may consider the following points while finalising its

decision on the proposal of the port:

(a). Since the financial year 2012-13 has already completed and the

port incurred `123.92 crores on maintenance dredging, the users

¹Hkkx IIIµ[k.M 4º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vlk/kj.k

(Oil PSUs) who have enjoyed the benefits of higher draft and

economies of transport should defray the additional cost incurred

by the port by paying lumpsum amount.

(b). First half year of the financial year 2013-14 is nearing an end,

the additional wharfage rate should be made effective from

1.4.2013 so that the port is compensated for the extra expenditure

spent on maintenance dredging for maintaining 12.5m draft at

COT.

5.1. In accordance with the consultative procedure prescribed, the COPT proposal dated 19 August 2013 was

forwarded to the concerned users/ user organisations for their comments.

5.2. Since the consolidated cost statements as well as activity-wise/ sub-activity-wise cost statements filed by the

COPT vide its letter dated 9 September 2013 are relevant for processing the subject proposal, a copy of the COPT’s

letter dated 9 September 2013 was also forwarded to the concerned users/ user organisations including BPCL. On the

advice of the COPT, the proposal was also forwarded to the other oil PSUs i.e. HPCL and the IOCL seeking their

comments.

5.3. The comments received from the Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPCL) were forwarded to the COPT as

feedback information. The COPT vide its letter dated 30 September 2013 has responded to the comments of the BPCL.

5.4. The comments received from Indian National Shipowners’ Association (INSA) were forwarded to COPT. We

have not received the feedback from COPT on the comments of INSA till finalisation of this case.

6. The Ministry of Shipping (MOS) convened a meeting on 8 October 2013 at New Delhi vide its letter

No.8(13)/2013-TAMP dated 4 October 2013 to discuss the pending tariff cases of the COPT. One of the tariff cases

discussed was the proposal received from the COPT for review of wharfage charges on the POL products prescribed in

its existing Scale of Rates. No minutes of the said meeting are received by us. The following points emerged during

the meeting:

(i)

Regarding the point made by COPT that the traffic considered in the last Order by this Authority is

unrealistically high and will not materialise, it was clarified quoting the relevant paragraph of the

tariff Order that this Authority has relied upon and considered the traffic estimates as furnished by the

port for arriving at the cost position of the port for the years 2012-13 to 2014-15.

(ii)

It was pointed out to the COPT that in the cost statements now furnished, the port has revised the

traffic, income and most of the estimates with reference to the estimates considered by this Authority

in the recent tariff Order dated 1 April 2013 and notified on 10 June 2013. Since the core issue in the

current proposal highlighted by the port is that the maintenance dredging relating to POL activity

should be considered in the cost statement of POL handling activity instead of allocation done to

VRC in the TAMP Order, it was suggested to the port to retain the estimates as considered by this

Authority in the April 2013 Order except the modification relating to allocation of maintenance

dredging cost to POL activity. The COPT agreed to examine the suggestion made at the meeting.

(iii)

As brought out above, the COPT has revised the estimates considered in the tariff Order of April

2013. Since processing of the revised cost statements filed by the COPT will involve considerable

time and in view of the exigency expressed by the COPT and if the COPT does not agree to retain the

estimates as considered by this Authority in April 2013 Order, a point emerged whether a rate to

cover the maintenance dredging expenses can be approved on ad-hoc basis with the consent of the

relevant users. However, the COPT expressed its inability to furnish consent of the relevant users to

the proposed additional rate of wharfage for POL products.

7.1. Subsequent to the meeting held by the MOS on 8 October 2013, the COPT has vide its letter dated 8 October 2013

sought approval of increase proposed in the wharfage rate of POL on ad-hoc basis. The main submissions made by the

COPT in this regard are given below:

(i)

The COPT proposal dated 19 August 2013 was submitted based on protracted discussions with BPCL

and other oil companies and in view of the urgency to recoup the heavy expenditure incurred by the

port toward maintenance dredging at the COT without commensurate income for the port.

(ii)

(a)

The Authority had suggested the port to submit revised cost statements after including

dredging costs under POL activity, keeping the figures of traffic, income and expenditure as

moderated by the Authority in the tariff revision Order issued in 2013.

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY

[PART III—SEC. 4]

(b)

However, the income as projected, which was based on figures of traffic projected for the

Five Year Plan/ Annual Plan, will not materialize due to delay in commissioning of major

projects like LNG terminal, MULT, Modern Coal Terminal and the bulk cement Terminals.

(c)

In the case of Crude and POL, the delay in commissioning MULT especially has upset all

calculations. Hence, income projections based on the figures will not be realizable.

(d)

There are changes in expenditure figures due to imminent revision of salaries and wages as

well as in depreciation due to installation of unloading equipments in COT.

(e)

Considering all the relevant issues COPT prays for a wharfage rate for POL as under:

2013-14

2014-15

Existing Wharfage (` per MT)

65.00

Additional Wharfage (` per MT)

45.90

52.60

84.78

Total

110.90

117.60

149.78

(iii)

Making changes in the income and expenses already approved by the TAMP in the SOR may require

more time to examine the proposal. Considering the critical fund position of the port, a further delay

to notify the revised rate of wharfage may harm the port trust.

(iv)

The port has been undergoing tremendous financial crunch during the last couple of months. The

port is not in a position to disburse salary and pension for the month of October 2013 and there are

several other contractual payments, which are kept pending for want of funds.

(v)

Since the review proposal on wharfage has been under consideration, the port has been continuing to

accommodate deep drafted vessels at COT. Non-finalisation of the revised rate is resulting in loss to

the port.

7.2. In view of the above position, the port has requested to issue appropriate orders to levy the proposed tariff of

` 117.60 (for 2013-14) with immediate effect on an ad-hoc basis so that the port can recover part of the expenditure

incurred on maintenance dredging through the enhanced rate.

7.3. It is seen that the ad hoc rate proposed by the port was the same as proposed by the port in its original proposal.

COPT has retained the proposed wharfage rate as in its original proposal and sought for ad-hoc approval of `117.60/

tonne for the year 2013-14.

8. On preliminary examination of the proposal and the COPT’s letter dated 9 September 2013, the COPT was requested

vide our letter dated 15 October 2013 to furnish information on a few points. The COPT vide its letter dated

17 October 2013 has furnished its reply. A summary of the information sought by us and reply furnished by COPT

thereon are tabulated below:

Sl.

No.

Information sought by us

Reply furnished by COPT

(i)

The COPT has vide its letter

dated 9 September 2013 while

furnishing

response

few

points raised by us stated that

dredging cost attributable to

POL activity has increased from

`1570.96 lakhs, `1629.46 lakhs

and `1722.24 lakhs allocated by

COPT in the recent general

revision proposal for the years

2012-13 to 2014-15 respectively

to `4633 lakhs, `4937 lakhs and

`5633 lakhs respectively for the

corresponding period in the

current proposal. In this context,

please furnish detailed working

for

revised

estimates

maintenance

dredging

cost

Detailed workings of revised maintenance dredging quantity allocated

to various locations of the channels are furnished as under:-

Maintenance

Dredging

attributable to COT

at 12.5 m draft

Maintenance

Dredging

attributable to ICTT

at 14.5 m draft

Maintenance

Dredging

attributable to inner

channel Berths at

10.7 m draft

Total

Quan-

tity

Bas

Approach

Channel

Bas

Approach

Channel

Bas

Approach

Channel

Out-

Chan

nel

Inner

Chan

nel

Out-

Chan

nel

Inner

Chan

nel

Out-

Chan

nel

Inner

Chan

nel

0.0

3.8

3.1

1.5

3.0

1.5

0.0

2.2

2.9

18.0

¹Hkkx IIIµ[k.M 4º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vlk/kj.k

allocated to POL activity and

support it with copies of contract

entered

with

Dredging

Corporation of India Ltd. for this

purpose.

Detailed working of revised estimates of maintenance dredging cost

allocated to POL activity are furnished as under:-

At 12.5 m draft

3.8 million Cu. m at

Outer Channel

3.1 million Cu. m

at Inner Channel

Rate per Cu. M

`48.80

`73.20

Dredging cost

`18.54 crs.

`22.69 crs.

Service tax @

12.36%

`02.29 crs.

`02.81 crs.

Total Dredging

cost

`20.83 crs.

`25.50 crs.

Grand total

`46.33 crs.

Copies of the documents confirming the contract between the Port

and M/s.DCI Ltd., for carrying out maintenance dredging in the Port

channels from April 2011 to March 2014 are furnished. As per the

copy of the contract furnished, the dredging cost for maintenance is as

follows:

2011-12 `104.40 crores

2012-13 `105.30 crores

2013-14 `109.80 crores

It is understood from the COPT

proposal

that

North

Tanker

Berth (NTB), South Tanker

Berth (STB) and Cochin Oil

Terminal (COT) located at inner

harbour of the port handle crude

and POL products. The port has

stated that the increased draft of

12.5 mtrs. is to be maintained at

COT and benefit on the same

will be available for cargo

vessels handled at COT. The

draft at NTB and STB is stated

to be maintained at 9.14 mtrs.

only. In this context, please

justify the basis to levy the

proposed

increased

wharfage

uniformly for all POL cargo at

inner harbour including POL

handled STB and NTB in the

light of the fact that

the

economies of increased draft is

not available at these two berths

viz. STB and NTB.

A uniform wharfage for POL at all the inner tanker berths is proposed

by the Port because the oil companies frequently get a vessel to load

at the lower draft terminal ant then top up at the higher draft COT.

There are also instances of bigger import parcels getting lightered at

COT and subsequently being shifted to NTB/STB at their request.

The predominance of BPCL on account of its Kochi Refinery in the

POL throughput of Cochin Port, which imports crude oil through the

SPM and arranges for the movement of refined products through the

tanker berths.

During the discussion with BPCL prior to submission of the proposal,

they suggested to have a uniform rate of wharfage for all tanker berths

in the inner harbour. In their letter dated 18-09-2013 addressed to

TAMP, BPCL has suggested to include South Coal Berth also under

the same wharfage regime. However, the Port is of the view that since

facilities at South Coal Berth are much less than the facilities

available at NTB and STB, the suggestion of the BPCL for inclusion

of SCB along with other tanker berths is not justifiable.

9. The maintenance dredging cost estimated and allocated by COPT between various activities/ sub-activities in the last

general revision Order, maintenance dredging cost estimates considered by this Authority in last general revision Order

dated 1 April 2013 and the revised maintenance dredging cost furnished by the COPT in the cost statement filed by the

port vide its letter dated 9 September 2013 on the current proposal is tabulated below:

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY

[PART III—SEC. 4]

Sl.

No.

Particulars

Considered by COPT in the last

proposal for general revision of its

SOR

Considered by TAMP in its Order

dated 1 April 2013

Considered by COPT in its letter

dated 9.9.2013 on the current

proposal

2012-13

2013-14

2014-15

2012-13

2013-14

2014-15

2012-13

2013-14

2014-15

Maintenance

Dredging Cost

Vessel Related

Activity

(i)

Port Dues

3504.45

3634.95

3841.92

4028.10

4178.10

4416.00

2586.41

2772.62

3163.49

(ii)

Pilotage

3504.45

3634.95

3841.92

4028.10

4178.10

4416.00

2586.41

2772.62

3163.49

(iii)

Berth Hire

3504.45

3634.95

3841.92

4028.10

4178.10

4416.00

2586.41

2772.62

3163.49

Cargo Handling

Activity

(i)

POL

1570.96

1629.46

1722.24

----

-----

4633.00

4937.00

5633.00

TOTAL

MAINTENANCE

DREDGING COST (1)

+ (2)

12084.31

12534.31

13248.00

12084.31

12534.31

13248.00

12392.23

13254.86

15123.47

Part

Revenue Share

considered

meet

maintenance

dredging cost *

Vessel Related

Activity

(i)

Port Dues

708.60

856.00

1027.17

1417.19

1712.01

2054.33

890.52

856.00

1027.17

(ii)

Pilotage

708.60

856.00

1027.17

1417.19

1712.01

2054.33

890.52

856.00

1027.17

(iii)

Berth Hire

708.60

856.00

1027.17

1417.19

1712.01

2054.33

890.52

856.00

1027.17

Total (B)

2158.8

2568.00

3081.51

4251.57

5136.03

6162.99

2671.56

2568.00

3081.51

Balance of maintenance

dredging cost (A-B)

9925.51

9966.31

10166.49

7832.74

7398.28

7085.01

9720.67

10686.86

12041.96

* COPT had considered 25% of the Revenue share to meet part of the maintenance dredging whereas this Authority

had considered 50% of the Revenue share to meet that expense.

10.1.

A joint hearing in this case was held on 29 October 2013 at the COPT premises. The COPT made a power

point presentation of its proposal. At the joint hearing, the COPT and the concerned users/ organisation bodies have

made their submissions.

10.2.

The Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (Kochi Refineries Limited) also made a brief power point

presentation on the proposal of the COPT.

11.1.

At the joint hearing, the COPT was requested to explain the reasons for mismatch in the estimates of

maintenance dredging cost revised by COPT vide its letter dated 9 September 2013 vis-à-vis the cost indicated in the

contract copy of the Dredging Corporation of India (DCI) for the years 2011-12 and 2012-13 forwarded by COPT vide

its letter 8 October 2013.

11.2.

In this regard, the COPT vide its letter dated 31 October 2013 has clarified the following:

(i)

As per the contract, the price accepted by COPT for the work of maintenance dredging during 2012-

13 is `105.30 crores. Apart from this amount, the Port has to compensate DCI for escalation in the

fuel price as provided in Clause 9.1-“Price adjustment for subsequent price variations” (copy

furnished). On both the payments, the Port has to pay Service Tax at the prescribed rates. In 2012-13,

the Port incurred an expenditure of `110.29 crores, including fuel escalation. Thus, the total

expenditure on maintenance dredging including Service Tax @12.36% amounts to `123.92 crores.

(ii)

The amount contracted for 2013-14 is `109.80 crores. The Port expects that the expenditure would be

to the tune of `118 crores during the year including fuel escalation. It may please be noted that this

amount has been included in our Revised Estimates for 2013-14. Hence, the port projected an

amount of `132.54 crores under this head, which is inclusive of Service Tax @ 12.36%.

¹Hkkx IIIµ[k.M 4º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vlk/kj.k

(iii)

The port has to tender the work of maintenance dredging of port channels for the year 2014-15. At

the time of submitting the proposal, an expenditure of `151.23 crores was projected for the year

2014-15. However, based on our recent discussions with potential bidders including DCI, it is

expected that the price will go up further. Hence, an amount of `150 crores (without Service Tax) is

considered for providing in the Budget Estimates for 2014-15.

12. On our request, the COPT has subsequently vide its email dated 5 November 2013 furnished the break up of the

Crude handled at SPM and POL traffic handled at the port berth for the period 1 April 2013 to 31 October 2013 which

is given below:

Sl. No.

Berth Name

Cargo Type

Qty (in tons)

Boat Train Pier (BTP)

POL Products

26826

South Coal Berth (SCB)

POL Products

26065

South Tanker Berth (STB)

POL Products

134439

North Tanker Berth (NTB)

POL Products

978215

Cochin Oil Terminal (COT)

POL Products

1205286

Sub Total

2370831

Single Point Mooring (SPM)

CRUDE

6374750

Grand Total

8745581

13. The proceedings relating to consultation in this case are available on records at the office of this Authority. An

excerpt of the comments received and arguments made by the concerned parties will be sent separately to the relevant

parties. These details will also be made available at our website http://tariffauthority.gov.in.

14. With reference to the totality of the information collected during the processing of the case, the following position

emerges:

(i)

This Authority has passed an Order No.TAMP/49/2011- COPT dated 1 April 2013 disposing of the

proposal of the Cochin Port Trust for general revision of its Scale of Rates which was notified in the

Gazette on India on 10 June 2013. It is relevant to mention here that in the general revision proposal

filed by the COPT which was disposed by this Authority on 1 April 2013, the COPT had proposed

status quo in the rates of all the tariff items.

The cost statement drawn and appended to the tariff Order dated 1 April 2013 estimated the cost

position for the years 2012-13 to 2014-15. The cost position at the (then) existing level of tariff for

the port as a whole for the year 2012-13 showed a deficit of around 20% which in absolute term

worked out to `75.17 crores. For the subsequent two years 2013-14 and 2014-15, the cost statement

reflected a meagre surplus of 0.29%, which in absolute term worked out to `2.67 crores. Since the

year 2012-13 would have been over by the time the Order came into effect, the cost position for the

years 2013-14 and 2014-15 was finally considered.

The estimated cost position for the port as a whole excluding estate activity for the period of two

years 2013-14 and 2014-15 showed a surplus of `71.63 crores i.e. an average net surplus of 8.59%.

However, recognizing that there was a huge shortfall to the tune of `1273 crores in the pension fund

as per actuarial valuation as on 31 March 2012 and that the port had not proposed to augment the

fund considering the financial crunch faced by it and also recognizing the estimated cost position for

the year 2012-13 reflected a deficit to the tune of `46.37 crores excluding estate activity, the proposal

of COPT to continue with the (then) existing tariff for the next two years 2013-14 to 2014-15 was

approved.

(ii)

The current proposal filed by the COPT is to seek compensation for maintenance dredging cost

incurred by the port to maintain the draft at Cochin Oil Terminal (COT) at 12.5 mtrs. which the port

states is beyond the scope of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) entered by the port with the

main oil user BPCL. The COPT has stated that as per the Agreement entered by the COPT with the

BOT operator India Gateway Terminal Private Limited (IGTPL), the port had to maintain draft of

12.5 mtrs. for Container Terminal operated by IGTPL at Port’s berth Q8 and Q9. Since the COT was

also in the same area, the oil users got the benefit of increased draft of 12.5 and also availed the

benefit of the economies of scale in freight by bringing deeper draft vessels without incurring any

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY

[PART III—SEC. 4]

additional outgo. The port has submitted that the IGTPL has shifted its operations to ICTT at

Vallarpadam in February 2011 and hence the COPT is not obliged to maintain the increased draft of

12.5 mtrs. at Q8 and Q9. Reportedly, as per the MOU entered by COPT with BPCL in June 2003,

the port is obliged to maintain draft of 9.14 mtrs. only at COT. But, the oil PSUs mainly the BPCL,

has requested the port to continue to maintain the increased draft of 12.5 mtrs. at COT even after the

IGTPL has shifted its container operations to ICTT, Vallarpadam. The port agrees to provide the

required draft of 12.5 mtrs. to POL users at the COT but seeks compensation to recover the

maintenance dredging cost incurred/ estimated to be incurred by the port for the POL users at COT.

In this backdrop, the port has filed the current proposal seeking increase in the existing wharfage rate

of `65/ tonne for POL handled at the port’s berth at Cochin Oil Terminal (COT), North Berth Tanker

(NTB) and South Berth Tanker (STB) to `110.90 per tonne in the year 2012-13, `117.60 per tonne in

the year 2013-14 and `149.78 per tonne in the year 2014-15.

(iii)

The main contentions of the COPT for filing the current proposal are summarised below:

(a)

In the last general revision Order, the COPT had apportioned part of the maintenance

dredging cost to the POL activity. However, this Authority in its Order of 1 April 2013 has

not allowed the approach adopted by the port. This Authority in the modified cost statement

has re-distributed the maintenance dredging cost apportioned by the port to POL activity to

the vessel related sub-activities though there is no such mention in the tariff guidelines of

2005. The COPT has submitted that due to high siltation at its port, the maintenance

dredging cost of COPT is second highest next to Kolkatta Port Trust. The approach of

loading the entire maintenance dredging cost by this Authority to vessel related activity has

led to steep rise in the vessel related charges in the past whereas the wharfage rate for POL

has remained at the same level of ` 65 per tonne since the year 1996-97. In view of the

above position, and also since the port has to incur additional maintenance dredging cost at

COT to provide the desired draft of 12.5 mtrs. at COT, at the request of POL users, and also

recognising that the port users agree to compensate the port for the same, the port has

requested to accept its approach of apportionment of the maintenance dredging cost to the

POL activity.

(b)

The revised traffic projections furnished by the COPT and relied upon by this Authority in

the General Revision Order of the COPT SOR in 2013 are gross overestimates. The revised

traffic projected by the COPT in the last tariff Order has not materialised. The port has,

therefore, requested to consider the modified traffic estimates now furnished in the current

proposal.

(iv)

(a)

As regards the point made by the COPT at (iii) (a) above relating to apportionment of

maintenance dredging cost to the vessel related activity in the last tariff Order, it is relevant

here to mention that 2005 guidelines prescribe broad guidelines for fixation of tariff.

Subsequent to announcement of 2005 guidelines, this Authority has prescribed the format

for filing of the tariff proposal by Major Port Trust. It is also relevant to mention here that

the Major Port Trust follow the accounting formats devised by M/s.S.B. Billimoria & Co.

and accepted by Ministry of Shipping in consultation with Comptroller and Auditor General

of India. The format prescribed by this Authority for filing the tariff revision proposal by

Major Port Trusts prescribes in detail the apportionment of various cost elements between

various activities/ sub-activities in the cost statement and in general it is in conformity with

the accounting formats of M/s.S.B. Billimoria & Co which are followed by the Major Port

Trusts. As per the format prescribed for filing tariff revision proposal by Major Port Trusts,

the maintenance dredging cost at the docks and the bunder is to be apportioned between

berthing and port services based on the silt dredged and the maintenance dredging cost

incurred for channel dredging is to be apportioned between the port dues and pilotage

activity. It is noteworthy that the Annual Accounts of the Cochin Port Trust for the years

2010-11 and 2011-12 also report maintenance dredging cost under the vessel related activity

and do not show any allocation of this cost to the cargo related activity for POL cargo. The

approach adopted by this Authority in the last tariff revision Order of the COPT is in line

with the format prescribed for filing tariff proposal and is uniformly followed at all the

Major Port Trusts.

As regards the point referred by the COPT about the deviation made in the New Mangalore

Port Trust, it is to be noted that this Authority in the general revision Order of the COPT

dated 25 January 2007 has pointed out that in the case of the New Mangalore Port Trust

while fixing the wharfage rate for crude and iron ore handled by the two major users at the

New Mangalore Port, all the vessel related cost including the relevant portion of the

¹Hkkx IIIµ[k.M 4º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vlk/kj.k

dredging cost and the handling cost are considered together for arriving at the per tonne

wharfage rate so that the cost of maintaining deeper draft for the larger size oil and ore

vessels are not passed on to the small vessels which may not require such depth. In fact,

borrowing the approach followed in the case of the New Mangalore Port Trust, this

Authority in the said tariff Order of 25 January 2007, had allowed apportionment of

maintenance dredging cost to the POL activity in view of the submissions made by the

COPT at that time and had also advised the port to file a separate cost statement for crude oil

for cargo and vessel together at the time of next tariff revision as done by few other Major

Port Trusts like the Visakhapatnam Port Trust and New Mangalore Port Trust for major

commodities handled by the port.

While processing the next general revision proposal of the COPT in the year 2010, the port

was again advised to file a separate cost statement for crude oil for cargo and vessel related

activity together for crude handled at SPM and at port berths in line with the advice rendered

in the tariff Order of 2007 as recorded in para 7.2. Sr. No.I (10)(i). The COPT, however, did

not file separate cost statement for POL as advised in the tariff Order of 2007. This

Authority for reasons recorded in the para 12(viii) (c) of the tariff Order dated 23 February

2010 that major part of POL handling has shifted from the port’s jetty to the SPM operated

by the BPCL-KRL for which separate tariff structure is allowed did not find it necessary in

that scenario to continue to allocate part of the maintenance dredging cost to the POL

handling activity. The approach followed in the tariff Order of February 2010 was followed

in the recent general revision Order of 1 April 2013 as regards apportionment of

maintenance dredging cost to vessel related activities. The submission made by the port in

the current proposal that it has to maintain draft of 12.5 mtrs. at COT at the request of POL

users which is beyond the draft level the port is obliged to maintain is a new submission of

the port in the current proposal. In view of the above, it is found that there is no apparent

error as such pointed out by the COPT as regards apportionment of maintenance dredging

cost done in its tariff revision Order of 1 April 2013.

(b)

As regards the point made by the COPT at (iii) (b) on traffic projections, it is relevant to

draw reference to para 11(iv) (c) of the tariff Order dated 1 April 2013 wherein it is recorded

that the revised traffic estimated by the COPT are considered without any modification. As

pointed out in para 11(v)(a)(i) of the said Order, in the absence of the port furnishing the

break-up of the revised POL tariff between the SPM and the port’s berth, the revised traffic

of the POL furnished by the port for the years 2012-13 to 2014-15 was apportioned to the

port’s berth and the SPM at 32% and 68% respectively applying the cargo share applied by

the port. Thus, this Authority has fully relied upon the revised traffic estimates furnished by

the COPT while determining the cost position in the last tariff Order. Hence here also, the

COPT has not pointed out any apparent error as such on the traffic projections considered in

the Order of 1 April 2013.

(c)

It is relevant here to state that during the entire proceedings of the general revision case

which concluded only recently in April 2013, the COPT had never made known that the port

incurs maintenance dredging cost for the POL users beyond the level required in the MOU

and hence the cost should be apportioned to the POL activity. The submission made by the

COPT in the current proposal to recover the maintenance dredging cost from the POL users

for the reasons stated by it is a new submission.

As per Clause 3.3.1. of the tariff guidelines of March 2005, a review can be undertaken only

with reference to errors apparent on the face of the records considered in the relevant

proceedings. It is clear that the COPT has not established any error apparent on the face of

the record warranting a review of the Order dated 1 April 2013.

However, in view of the extraordinary situation brought out by the COPT in the current

proposal and keeping in view clause 3.1.8. of the tariff guidelines of March 2005 which

enables Port Trusts to propose revision of tariff ahead of schedule for good and sufficient

reasons and also recognizing that the POL users also agree to pay the increased wharfage

rate if approved by this Authority to enable the port to meet the maintenance dredging cost

to provide the increased draft of 12.5 mtrs. demanded by the POL users, this Authority is

inclined to consider the proposal of the port. The entire analysis is, however, limited to the

extent of determining the special dredging rate for POL in addition to the existing wharfage

rate of ` 65 per tonne to enable the port to recover the maintenance dredging cost incurred

by the port for maintaining the increased draft of 12.5 mtrs. at the COT berths at the request

of POL users. In the current proceedings, the COPT has furnished cost statement for POL

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY

[PART III—SEC. 4]

activity as well as consolidated cost statement for the port as a whole as well as activity-wise

cost statement for cargo, vessel and estate related activities and cost statements for sub-

activities within the cargo and vessel related activities. The port has updated the estimates

of 2012-13 with actuals and has also furnished modified estimates of the traffic, income and

other estimates for the years 2013-14 and 2014-15 as against the estimates considered by

this Authority while approving the last tariff Order. However, for the reasons explained

above that the exercise is limited to determine the per tonne special dredging levy for POL,

the entire analysis is done retaining the estimates as considered by this Authority in the last

tariff Order of 1 April 2013 for the years 2012-13 to 2014-15 subject to a few modifications

which are required to arrive at the per tonne special dredging rate for POL as explained in

the subsequent paragraphs.

(v)

Before proceeding ahead it is relevant here to mention that the COPT subsequent to it filing the

proposal in August 2013 for revision in the wharfage rate for POL for the years 2012-13 to 2013-14

has vide its letter dated 8 October 2013 filed a proposal seeking approval of ad-hoc wharfage charges

on the POL products at ` 117.60 per MT for the year 2013-14. It is seen that the ad-hoc rate

proposed by the COPT for the year 2013-14 is same as proposed in the original proposal for the year

2013-14. Clause 2.17.1. to 2.17.4. of the 2005 tariff guidelines prescribe provisions for filing a

proposal for a new cargo/ service for which no tariff is prescribed in the existing Scale of Rates. The

guidelines also allow the port to simultaneously levy the proposed tariff on ad-hoc basis for an

interim period till the final rates are notified by this Authority. For this purpose, the rate has to be

derived based on the existing notified tariff for comparable service / cargo and has to be with mutual

consent of the concerned users. In the existing case the tariff proposed is for revision of existing

wharfage rate and it is not for new cargo/ service. Moreover, the COPT has not furnished consent of

the concerned users to the ad-hoc rate proposed by the port. The proposal dated 8 October 2013 filed

by the COPT seeking ad-hoc approval of the rate is not found to be in compliance with the provisions

of clause 2.17.1. to 2.17.4. of the tariff guidelines of 2005 and hence this Authority is not in a

position to grant any ad-hoc approval. However, the COPT is not put into any disadvantageous

position since this Authority has taken up this case and fixed final rate instead of approving rate for

an interim period.

(vi)

Allocation of maintenance dredging cost to the POL activity.

During the last tariff revision exercise, the COPT had proposed to apportion part of the maintenance

dredging cost estimate to POL (cargo handling) activity apart from the vessel related sub-activities

viz. port dues, pilotage and berth hire. For the reasons recorded in paragraph 11 (vi) (f) of tariff

Order dated 1 April 2013, the maintenance dredging cost estimated by the COPT for the years 2012-

13 to 2014-15 were apportioned to the sub-activities port dues, pilotage and berth hire under the

vessel related activity in line with the approach followed in the earlier tariff revision Order of COPT

in February 2010.

As stated earlier, the COPT has submitted that at the request made by the POL users the port is

required to maintain draft of 12.5 mtrs. at the COT as against draft of 9.14 mtrs. required as per the

MOU entered by the port with BPCL. The oil users also agree to compensate the port for the deficit

arising in the POL activity on this account which is also attributable to shortfall in the POL traffic

after the main Oil user – BPCL shifted its operations to SPM. In view of the above position, the

request made by the COPT to apportion relevant part of the maintenance dredging cost to the POL

activity is acceded to. It is relevant here to mention that this deviation from the prescribed method of

apportioning the maintenance dredging cost to the vessel related activity is necessitated in view of

extra-ordinary circumstances brought out by the COPT so as to arrive at the per tonne special

dredging levy to be recovered from the POL users, in addition to the existing rate of ` 65 per tonne.

(vii)

Revised Estimates of the Maintenance Dredging Cost:

The total maintenance dredging cost estimated by the COPT in the last tariff revision Order is to the

tune of `120.84 crores, `125.34 crores and `132.48 crores for the years 2012-13 to 2014-15

respectively which was relied upon and considered without any modification as recorded in para

11(vi)(f) of the April 2013 Order. In the cost statements now filed by the port, it is seen that the port

has revised the estimates of maintenance dredging cost to `123.92 crores, `132.55 crores and

`151.23 crores for the corresponding period. The copy of the contract entered by the COPT with the

Dredging Corporation of India (DCI) forwarded by the port shows that the cost for maintenance

dredging for three years i.e. 2011-12 to 2013-14 is `104.40 crores, `105.30 crores and ` 109.80

crores respectively plus service taxes. The revised estimates of maintenance dredging cost could not

be matched with the rates indicated in the contract copy entered with the DCI. The COPT has

clarified that apart from the rate indicated in the contract copy, the port has to compensate DCI for

¹Hkkx IIIµ[k.M 4º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vlk/kj.k

escalation in the fuel price as provided in Clause 9.1 of the contract. The port has substantiated it

with copy of the relevant extract of the document. The port has reported to have incurred an actual

expenditure of ` 123.92 crores, including fuel escalation and service tax in the year 2012-13. The

port has further clarified that though the amount contracted for the year 2013-14 is `109.80 crores,

the expenditure is estimated to be ` 118 crores including fuel escalation which has also been

considered in its Revised Estimates for the year 2013-14. The port has projected an expenditure of

`132.54 crores for the year 2013-14 in the cost statement which is inclusive of service tax. It is

relevant to state here that the annual escalation allowed in the estimation of cost items in the tariff

Order dated 1 April 2013 of COPT is 6.5%. The revised estimates of maintenance dredging cost at

`132.54 crores show escalation of 6.6% over the actual maintenance dredging cost reported in the

year 2012-13 which is found to be higher than the level allowed in its case in 1 April 2013. The

maintenance dredging cost for the year 2013-14 is considered by allowing 6.5% escalation over the

actuals reported for the year 2012-13 in line with the overall approach followed in the last tariff

Order. Accordingly, the revised maintenance dredging cost considered is `131.97 crores as against

`132.54 crores estimated by COPT.

For the year 2014-15, the port has estimated the maintenance dredging cost at `151.23 crores which

shows an increase of 14% over the revised estimates of the maintenance dredging cost by the COPT

for the year 2013-14. The port has stated that it is yet to tender the work of maintenance dredging of

port channels for the year 2014-15 and expenditure of ` 151.23 crores is projected for the year 2014-

15 based on the discussions of the port with potential bidders including DCI and it expects that the

price to escalate further. The port has stated that the maintenance dredging cost estimated in the

Budget Estimates 2014-15 is `150 crores (without Service Tax).

Since the annual escalation allowed in the estimation of the operating cost during the recent general

revision which concluded on 1 April 2013 is 6.5%, the revised maintenance dredging cost for the year

2014-15 is modified allowing 6.5% annual escalation over the revised estimates of the year 2013-14

in line with the annual escalation allowed in estimation of the operating cost in the tariff Order of 1

April 2013 Order. Accordingly, the revised estimates for maintenance dredging cost considered in

this analysis are `131.97 crores and `140.55 crores for the years 2013-14 and 2014-15 as against

`132.48 crores and `151.23 crores estimated by the COPT for the corresponding period. For the year

2012-13, the maintenance dredging cost is considered at `123.92 crores being the actual expenditure

reportedly incurred by the COPT.

(viii)

Revised share of apportionment of maintenance dredging cost to various activities:

(a)

During the last tariff revision, the COPT had apportioned the maintenance dredging cost to

the tune of `1570.96 lakhs, ` 1629.46 lakhs and `1722.24 lakhs for the years 2012-13,

2013-14 and 2014-15 respectively to the POL activity apart from apportionment of

maintenance dredging cost to the port dues, pilotage and berth hire under the vessel related

activity. It is seen from the cost statement that the percentage share of apportionment of

maintenance dredging worked out to 29% to each of the three sub activities under vessel

related activity (87%) and balance 13% towards POL activity.

In the cost statement filed by the port in the current proposal, it is seen that there is change in

the share of apportionment of maintenance dredging cost between the sub-activities under

the vessel related activity and the POL activity. In the cost statements filed in the current

proposal, the port has apportioned 20.87% of the total maintenance dredging to each of the

three sub activities under vessel related activity aggregating to 62.61% and balance 37.39%

towards POL activity.

(b)

When sought clarification for more allocation to POL activity, the COPT has clarified that in

its earlier proposal the port had considered maintenance dredging cost for POL activity for

only 2 million cu.m. which was for the channel from Dufferin Point to COT. It has now

modified the quantum of apportionment of the maintenance dredging expenditure to POL

activity considering the incremental quantity of silt to be removed from outer approach

channel through the inner channel upto COT. The port has furnished detailed working as

regards the maintenance dredging cost apportioned to POL activity at `4633.00 lakhs for the

year 2012-13 and clarified that the quantity of silt additionally removed comes to 6.9 million

cu.m for COT berth as against 2 million cu.m assumed in the last general revision proposal.

The revised maintenance dredging cost apportioned to each of the three sub-activities viz.

port service, pilotage and berth hire is `2586.41 lakhs for the year 2012-13 aggregating to

` 7759.23 lakhs. If the revised maintenance dredging cost apportioned to POL activity of

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY

[PART III—SEC. 4]

`4633.00 lakhs for the year 2012-13 is added, the total maintenance dredging cost works out

to ` 12392.23 lakhs, as furnished by COPT. This is reported to be on actual basis. For the

subsequent two years as well, the revised estimated maintenance dredging cost is

apportioned by the port applying the modified share of apportionment.

In view of the clarification furnished by the COPT explaining the reasons for modification in

the share of apportionment of maintenance dredging cost between vessel related sub-

activities and POL activity and also recognising that none of the users including the oil

PSUs viz. BPCL, IOCL and HPCL to whom the cost statements filed by the port were

forwarded for their comments have made any adverse remark on the apportionment of the

revised maintenance dredging cost by the port, the revised share of apportionment of

maintenance dredging cost on the one hand between port service, pilotage, berth hire and on

the other hand to POL activity followed by the COPT is relied upon and considered in this

analysis.

(c)

Accordingly, the revised maintenance dredging cost of `123.92 crores reported to be based

on actuals for the year 2012-13 and its apportionment to port dues, pilotage and berth hire

under the vessel related activity and to POL activity by the COPT as explained in (b) above

is considered in this analysis. For the years 2013-14 and 2014-15, in view of the moderation

done in the estimates of maintenance dredging cost arising out of application of escalation

factor of 6.5%, the maintenance dredging cost apportioned to each of three sub-activities

under vessel related activity is ` 2754.53 lakhs for the year 2013-14 and ` 2933.57 lakhs for

the year 2014-15 as against ` 2772.62 lakhs and ` 3163.49 lakhs considered by COPT for

the corresponding period. The maintenance dredging cost apportioned to POL activity is

`4934.15 lakhs in 2013-14 and `5254.86 lakhs in the year 2014-15 as against `4937.00 lakhs

and `5633.00 lakhs considered by COPT for the corresponding period.

(d)

During the last tariff revision Order, 50% of the estimated revenue share receipts from the

BOT operator was considered to meet the maintenance dredging cost from port dues,

pilotage and berth hire as against 25% considered by the port. The estimates of revenue

share receipts to meet the maintenance dredging cost are retained as considered by this

Authority in the last tariff Order. With reference to the POL handling activity, the port has

not considered any part of revenue share receipts to meet the maintenance dredging cost of

POL handling activity in the last tariff revision proposal as well as in the current proposal. It

has to be recognised that the maintenance dredging cost allocated to the POL activity is in

view of meeting the specific demand of POL users to maintain the increased draft of 12.5

mtrs. Therefore, the revenue share receipt need not cross subsidise the estimated

maintenance dredging cost for POL handling activity. Hence, the approach adopted by the

COPT of not apportioning any part of revenue share receipts to meet the maintenance

dredging cost of the POL activity is maintained in our analysis also.

(ix)

Revised traffic estimates for the Crude and POL:

(a)

During the last tariff revision, the COPT had originally estimated the POL traffic at 14

Million Metric Tonnes (MMT) for each of the years 2012-13 to 2014-15 of which the port

had estimated the traffic of SPM at 9.5 MTPA and 4.5 MTPA at the berths, as recorded in

paragraph no.12(v)(a)(i) of the Order of April 2013.

Subsequently, the port had revised the traffic estimates in line with the 12^th five year plan

and the overall POL traffic was revised to 14.40 Million Tonnes Per Annum (MTPA), 16

MTPA and 17.23 MTPA for the year 2012-13 to 2014-15 respectively. As stated in para 11

(v) (a) of the April 2013 Order, in our analysis, the revised traffic of the POL furnished by

the port for the years 2012-13 to 2014-15 was apportioned between the ports berth and the

SPM in the ratio 32% and 68% respectively adopting the percentage share of cargo applied

by the port. Consequently, the income estimates were also modified applying the wharfage

rate of `25 per tonne for crude at SPM and ` 65 per tonne for POL handled at port berth.

The port has in the current proceeding stated that the traffic of the SPM cannot exceed 9.5

MMTPA and hence has restricted the estimation of income for crude at SPM at 9.5 MTPA

for each of the years 2012-13 to 2014-15. In this context, it is relevant to state that during the

current proceedings, the port has reported that the overall crude and POL traffic handled in

the year 2012-13 is 13.90 MMTPA of which 10.06 MMTPA crude is handled at SPM and

3.84 MTPA of POL is handled at the port berths. Moreover, the actual POL and SPM traffic

handled in the first seven months from 1 April 2013 to 31 October 2013 is reported at 8.75

million tonnes consisting of 2.37 million tonnes of POL at the port’s berths and 6.37 million

tonnes of Crude at the SPM. The actual POL traffic at port berths and crude at SPM

¹Hkkx IIIµ[k.M 4º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vlk/kj.k

reportedly handled for the first seven months of the year 2013-14 if prorated for the full year

of 2013-14, it works out to 4.06 million tonnes of POL at port berths and 10.92 million

tonnes of crude at the SPM. Since the actual traffic handled by the COPT shows that port

has handled crude at SPM beyond 9.50 MTPA, there is no justification to restrict the crude

traffic of SPM at 9.50 MTPA as considered by the COPT.

The wharfage income estimated by the COPT from the POL products for 3.39 million

tonnes of POL at port berth and for crude at SPM at 9.5 million tonnes is not found to be in

line with the actual traffic reportedly handled by the port for the year 2012-13 and prorated

traffic estimated for the year 2013-14 based on first seven months of actual POL and crude

handled by the port.

In view of the actual traffic data made available by the port for the year 2012-13, the traffic

of the Crude at the SPM and POL at the port berths estimated in the last tariff revision Order

for the year 2012-13 is updated to the actual traffic of 10.06 MMTPA crude at SPM and

3.84 MTPA of POL at port berths. Corresponding modification is also done in the estimation

of the wharfage income from the crude at SPM and POL at port’s berths for the year 2012-

13.

(b)

For the year 2013-14, it is seen that the traffic of Crude at SPM considered at 10.88 million

tonnes in the last tariff revision Order is very much closer to the prorated crude traffic

estimate of 10.92 million tonnes at SPM derived based on the seven months actuals for the

year 2013-14. Hence, no modification is done with reference to the traffic and income

estimates of Crude at SPM for the year 2013-14.

The traffic of the Crude at SPM considered at 10.88 million tonnes for the year 2013-14

shows 8.15% growth over the actual traffic of 10.06 million tonnes handled in the year

2012-13. As against that, the traffic of crude at the SPM estimated for the year 2014-15 in

the April 2013 Order at 11.72 million tonnes shows a growth of 7.77% over the traffic

estimates of the year 2013-14 which is in line with the growth level achieved in the crude

traffic at the SPM in the immediate preceding year 2013-14. On this logic, the crude traffic

of the SPM is retained at 11.72 million tonnes for the year 2014-15 as estimated in the last

tariff Order. That being so, the income estimates from the SPM for the years 2013-14 and

2014-15 are also retained as estimated in the last tariff Order at `2720 lakhs and `2929.10

lakhs respectively.

(c)

The port in its current proposal has submitted that the POL traffic estimated in the general

revision proposal was on the higher side and has requested to scale it down. In the cost

statement now filed, the COPT has estimated the POL traffic at port berth at 3.5 million

tonnes per annum for estimation of wharfage income in the POL activity for the each of the

year 2013-14 and 2014-15. The port on our request has furnished the actual POL traffic

handled at the port’s berths for the first seven months of the year 2013-14 from 1 April 2013

to 31 October 2013 at 2.37 million tonnes. The POL traffic at port berths are proportionately

arrived for the full year of 2013-14 based on the actual POL traffic reportedly handled for

the first seven months of 2013-14. Accordingly, the traffic of POL at port’s berth for the

year 2013-14 is considered at 4.06 million tonnes and income therefrom is estimated at

` 2639 lakhs applying the prevailing wharfage rate of `65 per tonne.

(d)

The POL traffic estimated in the last tariff revision Order for the year 2014-15 at 5.51

million tonnes shows a growth rate of 7.6 % over the estimates of the immediate previous

year 2013-14 estimated at 5.12 million tonnes. As against that, the prorated POL traffic

estimated for the year 2013-14 based on seven months actual at 4.06 million tonnes shows a

growth of 5.7% over the actual POL traffic of 3.84 million tonnes handled by the port in the

year 2012-13. In view of the submissions made by the COPT in the current proposal that the

POL traffic considered in the last tariff Order are on the higher side and based on the actual

growth in the POL traffic derived for the full year 2012-13 and for seven months of 2013-

14, the estimate of POL traffic for the year 2014-15 considered in the last tariff Order at 5.51

million tonnes is moderated and considered at 4.29 million tonnes applying 5.7% growth

achieved in POL traffic in the year 2013-14. Consequently, the income estimates in the cost

statement for the POL activity for the year 2014-15 is also modified applying the wharfage

rate of ` 65 per tonne on the moderated POL traffic and is estimated at ` 2789.42 lakhs.

(e)

It is seen that whilst the COPT has scaled down the estimate of POL traffic at port berths

and crude at SPM it has not made corresponding reduction in the vessel related income. In

the absence of any details made available by the port about reduction in the number of POL

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY

[PART III—SEC. 4]

vessels, the GRT of POL vessel, etc., it is not possible to reasonably assess the reduction in

the vessel related income on account of reduction in the estimated POL traffic. However,

recognising that POL traffic at port berth is estimated to reduce by 17%, 21% and 22% for

the years 2012-13 to 2014-15 respectively, in the current analysis over the estimates of POL

traffic relied upon in the last tariff Order which ought to have an impact on reducing the

vessel related income but at the same time in the absence of the COPT furnishing the

requisite details for estimating reduction in the vessel related income, an ad-hoc reduction of

5% for the year 2012-13, and 7% in each of the years 2013-14 and 2014-15 is captured in

the income estimation of port dues, pilotage and berth hire considered in the last tariff Order.

(x)

In the light of the analysis given above, the cost statements for the port as a whole and for different

main activities / sub-activities for the years 2012-13 to 2014-15 considered in the last tariff revision

Order are modified. The modified cost statements are attached as Annex - I (a) to (r). Summarised

results of the modified cost statements are as follows:

Sr.

No.

Particulars

Operating Income

(` in crores)

Net Surplus / (deficit)

(` in crores)

Net Surplus / (Deficit) as a %

of operating income

Average

Surplus/

Deficit

2012-13

2013-14

2014-15

Total

2012-

2013-

2014-

Total

2012-13

2013-14

2014-15

COPT as a

whole

367.10

417.07

467.88

1252.05

-91.14

-47.01

-10.28

-148.43

-24.83%

-11.27%

-2.20%

-11.86%

Cargo

124.81

141.97

160.61

427.39

-40.98

-32.47

-21.88

-95.33

-32.83%

-22.87%

-13.62%

-22.31%

Vessel

195.43

227.33

258.61

681.37

-21.36

18.24

47.77

44.65

-10.93%

8.02%

18.47%

6.55%

Estate

46.86

47.76

48.67

143.29

-28.80

-32.78

-36.18

-97.76

-61.45%

-68.63%

-74.34%

-68.22%

COPT as a

whole excl

Estate

320.24

369.31

419.21

1108.76

-62.34

-14.23

25.90

-50.68

-19.47%

-3.85%

6.18%

-4.57%

Cargo

handling

General

cargo

25.98

30.74

35.27

91.98

-65.45

-64.97

-64.00

-194.42

-251.95%

-211.39%

-181.48%

-211.38%

POL

24.96

26.39

27.89

79.24

-35.90

-38.12

-40.50

-114.53

-143.82%

-144.46%

-145.21%

-144.52%

Fertiliser

4.52

4.67

13.71

0.86

0.54

0.37

1.77

19.10%

11.85%

7.94%

12.91%

SPM -

Wharfage

25.15

27.20

29.29

81.64

25.15

27.20

29.29

81.64

100.00%

100.00%

F.C. Periyar

0.12

0.13

0.38

-0.62

-0.65

-0.66

-1.93

-519.14%

-516.72%

-505.70%

-513.63%

Stuffing &

Destuffing

1.56

1.64

1.72

4.93

-7.54

-7.83

-8.00

-23.37

-482.60%

-476.87%

-464.20%

-474.26%

50% of

Revenue

42.52

51.36

61.63

155.51

42.52

51.36

61.63

155.51

100.00%

100.0%

Total

124.81

141.97

160.61

427.39

-40.98

-32.47

-21.88

-95.33

-32.83%

-22.87%

-13.62%

-22.31%

Vessel

related

Port Dues

43.68

50.71

57.75

152.14

21.49

29.28

37.35

88.13

49.20%

57.74%

64.68%

57.92%

Pilotage

77.23

89.66

102.11

269.00

-22.87

-12.29

-1.18

-36.34

-29.62%

-13.71%

-1.15%

-13.51%

Berth Hire

41.87

48.61

55.35

145.83

6.14

13.48

20.90

40.52

14.66%

27.73%

37.76%

27.78%

Dry docking

0.30

0.90

-0.32

-0.35

-0.37

-1.04

-106.90%

-115.66%

-122.44%

-115.0%

Nehru

Satabdhi

0.00

-36.39

-25.88

-25.74

-88.02

Water

supply -

Barge

0.75

0.78

0.82

2.35

-0.11

-0.10

-0.09

-0.30

-14.35%

-13.25%

-11.10%

-12.85%

¹Hkkx IIIµ[k.M 4º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vlk/kj.k

Sr.

No.

Particulars

Operating Income

(` in crores)

Net Surplus / (deficit)

(` in crores)

Net Surplus / (Deficit) as a %

of operating income

Average

Surplus/

Deficit

2012-13

2013-14

2014-15

Total

2012-

2013-

2014-

Total

2012-13

2013-14

2014-15

Water

supply -

Shore

0.16

0.17

0.49

-0.77

-0.81

-0.85

-2.43

495.24%

497.81% ^-492.41^%

495.11

SPM -

Pilotage &

Tug

30.38

36.03

41.03

107.45

10.40

13.85

16.67

40.92

34.24%

38.43%

40.62%

38.09%

Security

Charges

1.07

3.21

1.07

3.21 100.00% 100.00%

100.00%

100.00

Total

195.43

227.33

258.61

681.37

-21.36

18.24

47.77

44.65 -10.93%

8.02%

18.47%

6.55%

(a)

It can be seen from the above position that the estimated financial position at the existing

level of tariff for the port as a whole for the year 2012-13 to 2014-15 shows a deficit of

around -11.86%. In absolute terms, the deficit works out to ` (-)148.43 crores as against

total deficit of ` (-)72.50 crores estimated in the tariff revision Order of 1 April 2013. While

passing the tariff Order of 1 April 2013, it was decided to consider the estimated cost

position for the two years 2013-14 and 2014-15 as the financial year 2012-13 was already

over. The same approach is maintained now also while analysing the cost position in the

current proposal. The position for the two years 2013-14 and 2014-15 shows an average

deficit (-)6.47% as against surplus of 0.29% reflected in the last Order for the corresponding

period. In absolute terms, the total deficit works out to ` (-)57.30 crores as against surplus of

`2.67 crores estimated in the tariff Order of 1 April 2013.

(b)

In absolute terms, on a stand-alone basis, the vessel related activity shows a total net surplus

of `66.02 crores for the said two years as against total net surplus of `9.26 crores estimated

in the April 2013 Order. This works out to an average net surplus of 13.59% as against net

surplus of 1.79% estimated earlier. The cargo handling activity shows a total deficit of

` (-)54.35 crores as against total net surplus of ` 62.37 crores estimated in the April 2013

Order for the corresponding period. In terms of percentage, the average deficit works out to

(-)17.96% as against average surplus of 19.65% estimated in the last tariff Order of 1 April

2013.

(c)

The cost position relating to the estate activity does not undergo any change in this exercise.

(d)

The estimated cost position for the port as a whole excluding estate activity for the period of

two years shows a total surplus of ` 11.66 crores as against ` 71.63 crores surplus

estimated in the April 2013 tariff Order and in terms of percentage of estimated operating

income for the corresponding period, the net surplus works out to an average of 1.48% as

against average net surplus of 8.59% estimated in the last tariff Order. The difference of

`59.97 crores (`71.63 crores less `11.66 crores) in the overall position for the two years

2013-14 and 2014-15 in the cost statement prepared in the current exercise vis-à-vis the cost

position relied upon in the tariff Order of 1 April 2013 is on account the adjustments done in

the cost statement considered in the last tariff Order for reasons explained in the above

analysis and its impact for the years 2013-14 and 2014-15 is briefly tabulated below:

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY

[PART III—SEC. 4]

(` in lakhs)

Sl.

No.

Particulars

2013-14

2014-15

Total

(i)

Effect of increase in the maintenance dredging

cost vis-à-vis the estimates relied in the last tariff

Order

663.41

807.58

1470.99

(ii)

Impact of reduction in wharfage income from

POL on account of reduction estimated on POL

traffic

689.00

794.42

1483.42

(iii)

Impact of ad-hoc reduction of 7% in vessel

related income on account of reduction estimated

in POL traffic

1422.46

1619.86

3042.32

(iv)

Total (i + ii + iii)

2774.87

3221.86

5996.73

(e)

In the current exercise with the introduction of special dredging levy on per tonne basis for

POL products and crude handled at port’s berth viz. COT, NTB and STB approved as

discussed in the subsequent paragraph, the port is likely to earn additional revenue of `22.14

crores for the two years 2013-14 (from 1 November 2013 onwards) to 31 March 2015 to

meet the maintenance dredging cost at COT.

After considering the revenue likely to accrue from the special dredging levy approved in

this Order, the total net surplus for the years 2013-14 and 2014-15 will rise from `11.66

crores excluding the estate activity estimated in the cost statement now prepared to `33.80

crores. This will be within the total revenue surplus of `71.63 cores considered in the last

tariff Order of April 2013 wherein this Authority had decided to maintain status quo in the

then existing SOR as proposed by the COPT in view of huge shortfall to the tune of `1273

crores in the pension fund as compared to the requirement as per actuarial valuation as on 31

March 2012 and also in view of net deficit of `46.37 crores estimated for the year 2012-13

excluding estate activity. The net deficit for the year 2012-13 excluding estate activity is

estimated to increase to `62.34 crores in the cost statement prepared in current exercise.

As already brought out earlier, the reduction in the overall revenue surplus or increase in

deficit for that matter reflected in the cost statement now prepared arises on account of

increased maintenance dredging cost and reduction in the POL traffic and consequent

reduction in the wharfage income and adhoc reduction estimated in the vessel related

income vis-à-vis the estimates relied upon in the last tariff Order. It is relevant to reiterate

here that the entire exercise is done with a limited purpose of determining the special per

tonne dredging rate for POL products and crude handled at specific Port berths to recover

the maintenance dredging cost. The COPT has also not sought modification in any other

tariff item except for seeking upward revision in the existing wharfage rate for POL. That

being so, status quo is maintained in the Scale of Rates approved in the tariff Order of 1

April 2013 except for determining the special per tonne dredging levy for POL products and

crude handled at port berths viz. COT, NTB and STB.

(xi)

The COPT had earlier sought increase in the wharfage rate from POL retrospectively from 18

February 2011 i.e. from the date the obligation of the port to maintain draft of 12.5 mts at Q8 and Q9

ceased with the IGTPL shifting its operations to Vallarpadam. It has subsequently sought

retrospective revision in the wharfage rate of POL from the financial year 2012-13. Both the oil

PSUs i.e. the BPCL as well IOCL have raised objection on the retrospective revision in the rate and

have requested for prospective effect only. It is relevant to state here that the tariff guidelines of 2005

do not recommend granting approval of rates with retrospective effect. As stated earlier, since the

year 2012-13 was already over, while passing the last tariff revision Order, the cost position for the

years 2013-14 and 2014-15 was finally analysed. The same approach is followed in the instant case

for arriving the special per tonne dredging levy. Accordingly, the cost position for the POL activity

for the years 2013-14 and 2014-15 are considered. Therefore, according approval to the special

dredging levy retrospectively from the year 2012-13 cannot be acceded to.

¹Hkkx IIIµ[k.M 4º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vlk/kj.k

(xii)

It is relevant to state here that the proposal of the COPT seeking upward revision in the wharfage rate

for POL is to recover the deficit arising in the cost statement relating to the POL activity which arises

mainly on account of the revised maintenance dredging cost estimated by the port and reduction in

the POL traffic vis-à-vis the earlier estimates. For arriving at the revised wharfage rate for POL, the

port has adjusted the entire net surplus estimated from the SPM activity against the net deficit

estimated for the POL activity.

It is relevant to state here that the BPCL has contended that the MOU signed with COPT in 2003 for

SPM envisages reduction in wharfage rate of crude at SPM if volume at SPM crosses 9.00 MTPA.

They have argued that though the volume at SPM has exceeded 9 MTPA, the COPT has not proposed

any reduction in the wharfage rate for crude at SPM. It is noteworthy that in this exercise the port has

already set off the entire net surplus from SPM activity against the deficit in the POL for arriving at

the proposed revised wharfage rate for POL, which is considered for the purpose of arriving at the

special dredging levy for POL.

(xiii)

From the information relating to actual traffic of POL and crude furnished by the port for the first

seven month of 2013-14, it is seen that the COPT handles POL products at port berths at North

Tanker Berth (NTB), South Tanker Berth (STB), Cochin Oil Terminal (COT), South Coal Berth

(SCB) and Boat Train Pier and crude is mainly handled at SPM. Since the increased draft of 12.5

mtrs. is required to be maintained only at the COT, the port was requested to justify the basis to levy

the proposed increase in the wharfage uniformly for all POL cargo at COT as well as at STB and

NTB.

The port has clarified that POL vessels lighten or top up cargo at NTB and STB and then shift to

COT and get the advantage of the increased draft of 12.5 mtrs. The COPT has, therefore, requested

that berths - NTB, STB and COT should be treated at par as one separate class and the proposed

wharfage rate should be applied commonly to POL handled at NTB, STB and COT. The BPCL has

also endorsed this position and agrees that the revised wharfage rate should apply for POL handled at

NTB, STB and COT.

The BPCL has, however, stated that certain private players are using SCB for POL inputs hence

proposed revised wharfage rate should be extended and applied to POL handled at SCB as well to

have a level playing field for Oil PSUs. The COPT has in this context clarified that at SCB, port

provides 9.14 mtrs. draft with maximum DWT of 12,000 and displacement of 16,000, which is much

less than the facility available at NTB and STB. The port has also further clarified that SCB is on the

other side of the wharf at Mattancherry Channel. It has also confirmed that POL vessels handled at

SCB do not get the benefit of increased draft of 12.5 mtrs at the COT. Tariff leviable should be

commensurate with the facilities provided, as stipulated in clause 2.11.1 of the tariff guidelines of

March 2005. In view of the clarification furnished by the port and keeping in view the tariff

guideline position, it is not found appropriate and justified to require the POL handled at SCB berth

to pay the increased tariff when they are not getting the benefit of the increased draft at the COT.

Moreover, the suggestion of BPCL will result in flow of cross subsidy from POL handled at SCB to

COT/ NTB / STB. That being so, the POL and crude handled at SCB as well as Boat Train Pier are

kept outside the purview for arriving at the special per tonne dredging levy from POL handled at

port’s berth.

(xiv)

The COPT has considered POL traffic of 3.50 million tonnes for each of the years 2013-14 and 2014-

15 for arriving at the increase warranted in the wharfage rate of POL. The BPCL has indicated the

POL traffic at COT, NTB and STB at 3.70 million tonnes for the year 2013-14 and 3.90 for the year

2014-15. However, no basis for the estimated traffic is given by BPCL. For the purpose of this

analysis, the actual POL traffic for the year 2013-14 for the first seven months (i.e. from 1 April

2013 to 31 October 2013) furnished by the port for COT, NTB and STB at 2.317 million tonnes is

prorated for the full year and the traffic so arrived at 3.97 million tonnes is considered. The POL

traffic of these three port berths for the year 2014-15 is arrived taking the 2013-14 POL traffic

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY

[PART III—SEC. 4]

estimate as the base and applying 5.7% growth achieved in the POL traffic in the year 2013-14 over

the actuals of 2012-13 as already explained earlier. It is relevant to mention here that income

estimation from POL activity is done with reference to overall POL traffic handled at the port’s berth.

Whereas, for determining the special dredging rate for POL, the relevant POL traffic of COT, STB

and NTB are considered in line with the proposal of COPT. In the light of the above analysis, the

POL traffic of COT, NTB and STB considered to arrive at the special per tonne dredging levy is 3.97

million tonnes for the year 2013-14 and 4.20 million tonnes for the year 2014-15. Considering that

the special dredging levy approved is made effective from 1 November 2013 for the reasons

explained in the subsequent paragraph, the POL traffic for COT, NTB and STB for the year 2013-14

is considered proportionately for five months of 2013-14 i.e. from November 2013 to March 2014.

(xv) (a)

The COPT has computed increment in the wharfage rate for POL year-wise i.e. by `45.90

per tonne for the year 2012-13, `52.60 per tonne for the year 2013-14 and `84.78 per tonne

for the year 2014-15. Accordingly, the revised wharfage rate for POL proposed by the

COPT is `110.91 per tonne for the year 2012-13, `117.60 per tonne for the year 2013-14 and

`149.78 per tonne for the year 2014-15. As already stated earlier, the special per tonne

dredging levy for POL is arrived based on the cost position for the years 2013-14 and 2014-

15. In our exercise, consolidated net deficit position in the POL activity for the years 2013-

14 and 2014-15 is considered instead of computing year-wise differential rate. As stated

earlier, the total net surplus from the SPM activity estimated at ` 5649.10 lakhs for the two

years 2013-14 and 2014-15 is adjusted against the total net deficit estimated in the POL

activity for the two years 2013-14 and 2014-15 in line with the approach followed by the

port.

In short, the net deficit of ` 2213.81 lakhs in the POL activity for the two years 2013-14 and

2014-15 after setting off of the surplus in the SPM is spread over traffic of 5.85 million

tonnes of POL product from 1 November 2013 to 31 March 2015 and the per tonne rate so

derived comes to ` 37.84 per tonne, which is rounded off to `38/- per tonne.

(b)

The existing SOR of the port prescribes wharfage rate of ` 65 per tonne for Crude handled

at port berths as well as for POL Products handled at the port berths. The port has proposed

to revise the existing wharfage rate of ` 65 per tonne for POL. It is ascertained from the port

that the revision proposed for POL pertains to POL products as well as crude handled at

COT, NTB and STB. That being so, the special dredging rate approved will apply to both

Crude and POL products handled at port berths viz. COT, NTB and STB.

(c)

As stated earlier, the port has proposed to revise the existing wharfage rate of POL from

` 65 per tonne to `110.91 per tonne, ` 117.60 per tonne and `149.78 per tonne for the years

2012-13 to 2014-15. Recognising that the incremental rate is to be applied to the POL

handled at specific berths viz. COT, NTB and STB and not extended to POL handled at SCB

and other berths and also recognizing that the approval accorded is for specific purpose to

enable the port to recover the deficit in the POL activity arising mainly on account of

increased maintenance dredging cost and also recognizing that both BPCL and COPT admit

that it is an interim tariff arrangement till the POL traffic at COT will reach the break even

¹Hkkx IIIµ[k.M 4º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vlk/kj.k

point in the year 2015-16, it is found appropriate to approve the special per tonne dredging

levy on POL handled at COT, NTB and STB instead of merging it with the existing POL

wharfage rate of `65 per tonne. The existing wharfage rate of `65 per tonne for POL

products and crude handled at port berths will continue as prescribed in the existing Scale of

Rates.

In addition to the existing wharfage rate of ` 65 per tonne, a special dredging levy for POL

and crude handled at port berth viz. COT, NTB and STB is approved at ` 38/- per tonne.

The working for arriving at the special per tonne dredging levy from POL and crude at Port

berth is furnished as part of Annex - I(f). A summary of the working as furnished by the

COPT and modified working considered in our analysis is tabulated below:

Sr.

No.

Particulars

Revised Estimates furnished

by Port vide its letter dated

09.09.2013

Estimates considered for the

current proposal

2012-13

2013-14

2014-15

2012-13

2013-14

2014-15

POL

Traffic

(MMT)

considered to arrive at the

rate

3.39

3.50

3.39

3.97

4.20

Net Deficit in the POL

activity

-3931.34

-4215.83

-5342.34

-3589.65

-3812.43

-4050.48

Net Surplus in the SPM

Activity

2375.00

2515.00

2720.00

2929.10

Net Revenue Deficit in POL

after setting off Net Surplus

in SPM activity (2-3)

-1556.34

-1840.83

-2967.34

-1074.65

-1092.43

-1121.38

POL traffic

(In our analysis, POL traffic

for the 2013-14 is considered

from

November

2013

onwards on pro-rata basis

plus traffic for the year 2014-

15)

3.39

3.50

5.85

Additional Wharfage (` per

tonne) arrived by the COPT.

(In our analysis separate rate

the

nomenclature

special per tonne dredging

levy from POL products and

crude handled at port berths

viz. COT, NTB and STB is

prescribed

instead

merging it with the existing

Wharfage rate)

45.91

52.60

84.78

37.84

(Rounded off to

`38.00 per tonne)

Revised Wharfage for POL

proposed by COPT after

adding

the

additional

wharfage rate at Sr. No.6

above

110.91

117.60

149.78

Existing wharfage for

POL to continue as

per SOR. In addition

to that ` 38.00 per

tonne is prescribed as

special dredging levy

at COT, NTB and

STB

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY

[PART III—SEC. 4]

(xvi)

The cost incurred by the port towards maintaining draft at the berth is a vessel related service and is

captured in vessel related activities as per the format prescribed as stated earlier. In the instant case,

however, in view of the submission made by the port that the increased draft at the berth is

maintained at the request of the POL users and the oil PSUs agree to bear the burden on this account

except for the dispute on the quantum of the tariff, the maintenance dredging cost is identified with

cargo handling activity (POL) for limited purpose of enabling the COPT to realize the maintenance

dredging cost from the cargo interest since the cargo interest is also agreeable to this arrangement.

As a measure of abundant precaution, it is clarified that this should not be quoted as a precedence by

any other Major Port Trust for apportioning the maintenance dredging cost to the cargo handling

activity. The COPT has proposed to recover the incremental tariff from POL cargo users availing the

benefit of increased draft at COT. In view of this and recognising that the oil users also agree to the

same, this Authority is inclined to concur with the proposal of the COPT for recovery from POL

users handling POL products and crude at port berths viz. COT, NTB and STB.

During the processing of the case, some of the oil users had requested the COPT to restore the draft

of 12.5 mtrs. at COT immediately and ensure to maintain the draft at 12.5 mtrs. The COPT has

agreed to restore the draft at 12.5 mtrs immediately and to maintain it at that level. The approval

accorded to the special per tonne dredging levy of `38/- per tone is subject to the condition that the

COPT immediately restores the draft at 12.5 mtrs at COT and maintains it at that level.

(xvii)

The COPT has stated that the Oil PSUs are not committing any assured volume to the port through

tanker berths. Hence, the incremental revenue projected through additional wharfage rate may not be

achieved in the event of further reduction in the volume of POL brought by the users. Considering

this position, the COPT has requested this Authority to issue appropriate direction to Oil PSUs to

compensate the port adequately in the event of shortfall, if any, in handling of POL products vis-à-vis

the projections. In this context, it is clarified that the mandate of this Authority is to determine the

tariff for services provided by Major Port Trust and Private Terminal operating thereat following cost

plus approach as per the 2005 tariff guidelines in the case of Major Port Trusts. This Authority does

not have mandate to issue direction to users to compensate the port adequately in the event of

shortfall in the revenue of the port.

(xviii)

(a)

As per clause 3.2.8. the rates approved by this Authority come into effect 30 days after the

date of notification of the Order in the Gazette of India. In exceptional cases, retrospective

revision of rates can be allowed for reasons to be recorded.

Lead time is given to enable the port trusts to update their billing system to implement the

revised tariff and to give advance intimation to all the stakeholders. In the instant case, the

purpose of levy is to enable the COPT to recover the maintenance dredging cost being

incurred at the request of oil users. The concerned users are also in agreement to bear the

cost of maintenance dredging. In view of this and considering the deficit position of the

year 2012-13, it is appropriate that the rate comes into force with immediate effect i.e. from

1 November 2013. As stated earlier, for the purpose of arriving at the special rate, the POL

traffic of the year 2013-14 is considered from 1 November 2013. It is relevant to mention

here that though the approval is accorded from 1 November 2013, the entire net deficit in the

POL activity from 1 April 2013 to 31 October 2013 is captured while arriving at the special

rate of `38/- per tonne.

(b)

The tariff guidelines stipulate a tariff validity cycle of 3 years. The cost position considered

in this analysis is till March 2015. Further, it is appropriate to review this tariff item along

with the review of other tariff items prescribed in its Scale of Rates. That being so, the

validity of the special dredging levy for POL charge is prescribed till 31 March 2015 to

make it co-terminus with the validity of its Scale of Rates of the COPT approved by this

Authority in the tariff Order of 1 April 2013.