85 GI/2015

(1)

jftLVªh laö Mhö ,yö&33004@99

REGD. NO. D. L.-33004/99

vlk/kj.k

EXTRAORDINARY

Hkkx III —[k.M 4

PART III—Section 4

izkf/dkj ls izdkf'kr

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

la- 07]

ubZ fnYyh] lkseokj] tuojh 5] 2015@ikS"k 15] 1936

No. 07]

NEW DELHI, MONDAY, JANUARY 5, 2015/PAUSA 15, 1936

egkiRru iz

egkiRru iz’kqYd

’kqYd

’kqYd izkf/kdj.k

izkf/kdj.k

vf/klwpuk

eqEcbZ] 24 fnlECkj] 2014

lalalala- Vh,,eih@30@2014&ihihVh

Vh,,eih@30@2014&ihihVh

Vh,,eih@30@2014&ihihVh-&egkiRru U;kl vf/kfu;e 1963 ¼1963 dk 38½ dh /kkjk 48 ds varxZr iznRr ’kfDr;ksa dk mIk;ksx djrs gq, egkiRru iz’kqYd

izkf/kdj.k ,rn~}kjk ikjknhi iRRku U;kl ¼ihihVh½ ls izkIr gkcZj eksckby ØsUl ¼,p ,p lh½ ds iz’kqYd lhek fu/kkZj.k izLrko dks fuEufyf[kr vkns’kkuqlkj fuiVkrk gSA

rFkk ;g vkns’k fo’ks"k :Ik ls fdlh ,d lsok iznkrk ij ugha cfYd ihihVh esa lHkh lsok iznkrkvksa ij leku :Ik ls ykxw gksxkA

egkiÙku

egkiÙku iz’kqYd

iz’kqYd

iz’kqYd izkf/kdj.k

izkf/kdj.k

dsl la

dsl la- Vh,,eih@30@2014

Vh,,eih@30@2014

Vh,,eih@30@2014-ihihVh

ihihVh

ikjknhi iÙku U;kl

- - -

vkosnd

dksje

¼i½

Jh Vh- ,l- ckyklqczã.;u] lnL; ¼foRr½

¼ii½

Jh lh- ch- flag] lnL; ¼vFkZ’kkL=½

vkns

vkns’k’k’k’k

¼uoEcj] 2014 ds 28osa fnu ikfjr½

;g ekeyk gkcZj eksckby ØsUk ¼,p,elh½ ds iz’kqYd lhek fu/kkZj.k fdlh ,d lsok iznkrk ds lanHkZ esa ugha cfYd ihihVh ds lHkh lsok iznkrkvksa ij

leku:Ik ls ykxw] ikjknhi iÙku U;kl ls izkIr izLrko ls lEcaf/kr gSA

2- ;g ;kn fd;k tk, fd ihihVh ij LFkkfir gkcZj eksckby Øsu Ikz;ksx ds iz’kqYd fu/kkZj.k ls lEcfU/kr ihihVh ls izkIr izLrko dks bl izkf/kdj.k us vius fnukad

30 fnlEcj] 2009 ds vkns’k }kjk fuiVku fd;k FkkA ;g vkns’k Hkkjr ljdkj ds jkti= fnukad 12 tuojh] 2010] jkti= la[;k 21 }kjk vf/klwfpr fd;k x;k FkkA

ihihVh ij ,p,elh ds iz;ksx dk iz’kqYd fnlEcj] 2009 esa bl izdkj fu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k Fkk fd ;g iz’kqYd lhfyax nj Fkh rFkk lkekU; :Ik ls ihihVh ij ykxw Fkh

rFkk fdlh ,d ¼fof’k"V½ lsok iznkrk ls lEcfU/kr ugha FkhA tSlk fd iz’kqYd ekxZn’khZ 2005 ds mi&[k.M 7-2 esa bafxr fd;k x;k Fkk vkSj Hkkjr ds jkti= esa vkns’k

dh vf/klwpuk ds 15 fnu lekfIr ls rhu o"kZ ds fy, oS/k FkkA

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY

[PART III—SEC. 4]

3-1

twu] 2014 esa ih ih Vh us 1000 Vu /kfjrk dh ,p ,e lh dk iz’kqYd fu/kkZfjr djrs gq, 2 fofHkUu izLrko tek

fd,A ;g crkuk gS fd ,p ,e lh ds iz;ksx ds lkekU; iz’kqYd dh oS/krk 26 tuojh] 2013 dks lekIr gks xbZ rFkk ih ih Vh

ds }kjk igyk izLrko ,p ,e lh ds iz’kqYd dks tuojh 2013 ds ckn fu/kkZfjr djus gsrq Fkk] blus nwljk izLrko tek fd;k

tks dfFkr vfrfjDr ,p ,e lh ds iz’kqYd fu/kkZj.k gsrq Fkk fd ih ih Vh vfrfjDRk ,p ,e lh dks dk;Z ij yxkus gsrq fufonk

vkeaf=r djus tk jgk gSA

3-2

bl lEcU/k esa gekjs i= fnukad 20 twu] 2014 ds i= }kjk rqjUr ih ih Vh dks lwfpr fd;k fd tks nks izLrko

fnukad 6@7 twu vkSj 7 twu] 2014 dks ih ih Vh us nks rjg dh iz’kqYd nj izkIr djus gsrq] ,d gh /kkfjrk okyh ,p ,e lh

¼100 VUk ,p ,p lh½ ds fy, fn, gSa os iz’kqYd ekxZn’khZ 2005 dh /kkjk 7-2 ds vuq:Ik ugha gSaA blfy, ih ih Vh dks vuqjks/k

fd;k x;k Fkk fd vius izLrkoksa dks u;s Lo:Ik esa la’kksf/kr dj] dkuwu lEer ih ih Vh ij ,p ,e lh ds iz;ksx dk ,d

leku ’kqYd fu/kkZj.k tks fd fdlh ,d ¼fof’k"V½ lsok iznkrk ls lEcfU/kr u gks rFkk vfrfjDr ,p ,e lh ds vf/kdkj o

O;oLFkk dh Li"Vrk ds lkFk izLrqr djsaA””

3-3

vkxs] ih ih Vh us ubZ ØsUk ds fy, mPp iz’kqYd dk izLrko bl vk’k; ls lkspdj j[kk Fkk fd mPp mRikndrk

okyh ubZ ØsUk ls lsok iznkrk dks vPNh nj izkIr gksA ih ih Vh ls vuqjks/k fd;k x;k Fkk fd dq’kyrk ls tqM+s iz’kqYd dk

izLRkko djsa] bl rjg vPNh dq’kyrk gsrq izksRlkgu rFkk fu/kkZfjr ekudksa ls de dq’kyrk gsrq izksRlkgu izkIr gksA ;g Hkh ih

ih Vh ds laKku esa yk;k x;k Fkk fd dq’kyrk ls tqM+k iz’kqYd <a+kpk vU; phtksa ds lkFk fLFkfr ds vuq:Ik gksxk tc 100 Vu

ls vyx fofHkUu {kerk okyh ØsUk iz;ksx esa yk;h xbZ gksA

4-1

bl Hkwfedk esa ih ih Vh us vius 17 tqykbZ] 2014 ds i= }kjk gkcZj eksckby ØsUk ¼,p ,e lh½ ds iz;ksx dk iz’kqYd

fu/kkZj.k dk izLrko tek fd;kA ih ih Vh ds }kjk fn;s x;s izLrko ds tks eq[; lq>ko Fks os la{ksi esa fuEufyf[kr gSa A

¼i½

bl dh x.kuk ,d ,p ,e lh dh okLrfod Okkf"kZd izgLru {kerk 2 fefy;u ehfVªd Vu dks /;ku esa j[k

dj dh xbZ gSA ;g fu"d"kZ 2007&08 ls 2013&14 rd ,p ,e lh }kjk dkxks± ds okLrfod izgLru dk

vkSlr fudky dj fd;k x;k gSA

¼ii)

gkcZj eksckby ØsUk dh dher bl ds fuekZrk nkjk izLrkfor fd;s x;s ctVh; vk/kkj ij yh x;h gSA tks

34-30 yk[k ;wjks gS vkSj 2-70 yk[k ;wjks blds ifjogu dh ykxr ds fy, ekus x;s gSaA lhek 'kqYd 25%

ekuk x;k gSA lHkh lekos'kh ykxr dh x.kuk Hkkjrh; #i, esa 3700 yk[k #i, dh xbZ gS vkSj 2-70 yk[k

viÝaV çhfe;e] C;kt vkSj dk;Z'khy iwath dh vfrfjä jkf'k 950 yk[k #i, eku dj ,p ,e lh dh

dher 4650 yk[k ekuh x;h gSA

¼iii½

fofHkUu enksa ds vUrxZr ifjpkyu O;; Vh,,eih }kjk fu/kkZfjr Lrj ls fy, fy, x;s gSaA ;|fi bu enksa

ij okLrfod O;; vf/kd gSa] tSlk fd iqtsZ fons'kksa ls fy;s tkus gSa vkSj mudk Hkqxrku fons'kh eqækvksa esa

fd;k tkuk gSA ,p ,e lh dh mPp dher dks ykxw djus ls ;g ihihVh ij dkxks± dh izgLru ykxr esa

o`f) djsxk tks xzkgdksa dks grksRlkfgr vkSj ifj.kke esa dkxks± vkl&ikl ds canjxkgksa ds fy, foLFkkfir

gks tk,xkA

¼iv½

ikjknhi iksVZ esa gkcZj eksckby Øsu dk LFkkiu rsth ls dkxks± fudklh ds fy, cqjh rjg ls vko';d gS]

rkfd mRikndrk vkSj lexz ykHkçnrk esa o`f) gksA ihihVh ykblsal nsus vkSj jktLo dekus ds fy, cgqr

mRlqd ugha gS cfYd bldh mRlqdrk vf/kd dkxks± dk izgLru djus esa gS tks ,p ,e lh LFkkiu ls

ihihVh dh dk;Z {kerk dks c<k,xkA

¼v½

27-06-2014 dks Hkqous'oj esa ,d dsl ¼mPp U;k;ky; esa ,p ,e lh dk dqN ekeyk½ dh la;qä lquokbZ ds

nkSjku ifjpkydsak }kjk o`f) çko/kku djus ds fy, tksj fn;k tk jgk Fkk D;kasfd ifjpkyu O;; esa b±/ku

vkSj Je ykxr tks vkSlr ls vf/kd mPp nj ij gj lky c<+ jgh gSaA bl dks ns[krs gq, ;g izLrko fd;k

tkrk gS fd Ck<ksrjh nj dher baMsDl ds 60% ij tks ihihVh ds vU; izkstsDV~l ds fy, Hkh gS mPpre

lhek 3% ls vf/kd u gksA Åij of.kZr ckrksa dks /;ku esa j[k dj fu/kkZj.k nj fons’kh dkxks± ds fy, 82-45

rFkk rVorhZ ds fy, 49-47 cSBrh gSA

4-2

ihihVh }kjk x.kuk dh ,p ,e lh dh izfrVu nj dk dher fooj.k fuEu izdkj gS%&

Ø-la-

fooj.k

vk/kkj

dk;kZUo;u

Ykk[k esa

100 Vu eksckby gkcZj Øsu dh dher

¼yk[k esa½ ¼MCY;w Mh oh½ ¼2963-70 yk[k

okLrfoda½

3700-00

vU; [kpsZ ¼e’khu lapkyu gsrq vU;

vko;d lqfo/kk,a] viÝaV izhfe;e C;kt

rFkk dk;Z’khy iw¡th vfrjsd ds lkFk½

vU; [kpkZsa dk

fooj.k

Ykk[k esa

fofHkUu nsunkj

¼2 eghus½

150-00

viÝaV izhfe;e

750-00

dy iqtsZ

50-000

dqy

950-00

dqy iw¡th dher

4650-00

¹Hkkx IIIµ[k.M 4º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vlk/kj.k

Okkf"kZd {kerk ¼fefy;u Vu esa ½

2-.00

III

Ikzpkyu dher

¼v½

b±/ku dh dher

¼okLrfodrkuqlkj½

0-08 yh@Vu

jsV izfr yh- 72@&

115-20

¼c½

ejEer rFkk vuqj{k.k dher ¼midj.k

dh dher ds 5% dh nj ls½

¼Vh , ,e ih ds vuqlkj½

;kaf=d midj.k dh dher

dk 5%

5% * 3700 yk[k

185-00

¼l½

Ckhek

¼Vh , ,e ih ds vuqlkj½

;kaf=d midj.k dh dher

dk 1%

1% *

3700 yk[k

37-00

¼n½

voewY;u

¼Vh , ,e ih ds vuqlkj½

dEiuh ,DV esa of.kZr ekunaMksa

ds vuqlkj

10-34% *

3700 yk[k

382-58

¼d½

ykblsal ’kqYd

vk/kkj nj ds vuqlkj

1200 izfr eghuk]

12 eghus

0-14

¼[k½

vU; [kpsZ I ds 5% dh nj lsA

¼Vh , ,e ih ds vuqlkj½

dqy fu/kkZfjr lEifr dk 5%

5%*

700 yk[k

185-00

dqy ¼Øe la[;k v ls [k½

904-92

16% dh nj ls vkj vks lh bZ

¼voewY;u ds lkeaTkL; ds ckn½

yxkbZ xbZ i¡wth dk 16%

16%*

4650 yk[k

744-0

dqy dher rFkk fuos’k ij vk;

III + IV

1648-92

fdjk;k iz’kqYd izfr f’k¶V

VII

fdjk;k iz’kqYd izfr Vu ¼fons’kh½

1648-92

yk[k@

2 fefy;u

82-45

VIII

fdjk;k iz’kqYd izfr Vu

60%*]

82--45

49-97

4-3

ih ih Vh ds fnukad 17 tqykbZ] 2014 ds i= ls ;g ns[kk x;k fd bl lEcU/k esa ih ih Vh ekud nj dk izk:Ik ugha

j[k ik;k FkkA 2005 dh ekxZnf’kZdk dh /kkjk 3-2-4 ds vUrxZr izLrkfor iz’kqYd dk laogu iz;ksxdrkZvksa ds chp djuk

vko’;d gSA gekjs fnukad 23 tqykbZ] 2014 ds i= }kjk ih ih Vh dks vuqjks/k fd;k x;k Fkk fd izLrkfor ekud nj dk

izk:Ik mudks ’kkflr djus dh 'krks± ds lkFk j[ksaA

4-4

vkxs tSls fd ih ih Vh us Hkfo"; esa lsok nsus okys lsok iznkrkvksa ds uke mtkxj ugha fd;s Fks ftuls fd bl ekeys

ds lEcU/k esa lykg e’kfojk fd;k tk ldrk FkkA gekjs mi;ZqDr i= ds ek/;e ls ;g Hkh vuqjks/k fd;k x;k Fkk fd gksus okys

lsok iznkrkvksa ds uke muds lEidZ fooj.k ds lkFk mtkxj djsaA

4-5

bl vk/kkj Hkwfedk esa] ih ih Vh us vius 2 vxLr] 2014 ds i= ds vUrxZr] ih ih Vh ij ,p ,e lh lsok iznkrkvksa

ds lEidZ fooj.k ds lkFk ekud njksa dk izk:Ik mtkxj fd;kA ekud nj dk izk:Ik bl izdkj gS%&

uksV : Åij of.kZr vk/kkj nj dkxks± dh lHkh Jsf.k;ksa gsrq gSA daVsuj izgLru orZeku izko/kkuksa ds vu:Ik gksxkA

fu/kkZfjr lykg e’kfojk dh izfØ;k ds vuqlkj ih ih Vh ls izkIr 17 tqykbZ] 2014 vkSj 2 vxLr] 2014 ds izR;sd

izLrko dh izfr lacaf/kr iz;ksxdÙkkZvksa@iz;ksxdÙkkZvksa ds lewgksa es muds fopkj tkuus ds fy, laofgr dh xbZA iz;ksxdÙkkZvksa ds

lewg ls izkIr lq>ko okilh lwpukFkZ ¼QhM cSd½ ih ih Vh dks Hksts x, ih ih Vh us vius fnukad 30 flrEcj] 2014 ds bZ esy

rFkk 20 vDVwcj] 2014 ds i= }kjk iz;ksxdÙkkZvksa@iz;ksxdÙkkZvksa ds lewg ds lq>koksa dk tokc fn;kA

izLrko dh izkjfEHkd tk¡p ds vk/kkj ij gekjs 11 flrEcj] 2014 ds i= ds ek/;e ls ih ih Vh dks dqN eqn~nksa ij

lwpuk@Li"Vhdj.k ds fy, vuqjks/k fd;k x;k FkkA ih ih Vh us vius 30 flrECkj] 2014 ds i= }kjk bldk tokc fn;k FkkA

iz'uksa dk mRrj nsrs gq, ih ih Vh us iqu% izLrko j[kkA gekjs }kjk mBk;s x, iz’u RkFkk ih ih Vh ds mRrj uhps lkj.khc¼ gSaA

Ø - la-

dkxks± izgLru izfrfnu

nj izfr Vu

fons’kh

rVorhZ

6000 ls uhps

65-96

39-58

6001&7000

74-21

44-53

7000 ls Åij

82-45

49-47

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY

[PART III—SEC. 4]

Ø-

la-

gekjs }kjk mBk;s x;s iz’u

ih ih Vh }kjk fn;s x;s mRrj

ihihVh ;g lqfuf’pr djs fd lanfHkZr

izLrko ihihVh ij ,p,elh ds iz;ksx dks

lkekU; mPpre lhek nj fdlh O;fDrxr

¼fof'k"V½ lsok iznkrk ds lanHkZ ds fcuk r;

dh xbZ gS tSlk fd ekxZnf'kZdk 2005 dh

/kkjk 7-2 esa of.kZr gSA

i= la[;k bZ MCyw@MCyw,l@ Vsd04@2014¼485½

fnukad 17 tqykbZ] 2014 ds }kjk fd;k x;k izLrko ih ih Vh ij ,p

,e lh dh lkekU; mPpre lhek nj fu/kkZj.k djus gsrq gSA

¼v½ izLrkfor 82--45 eh- Vu izHkkj iz’kqYd

dh ckr djsa rks ;g ns[kk x;k gS fd

2007&08 ls 2013&14 ds le; esa

vkSlru okLrfod dkxks± dk izgLru] 1

u- ,p ,e lh dks vk/kkj cukdj fd;k

x;k gSA lkekU; {kerk vk/kkfjr iz’kqYd ls

foeq[k gksdj okLofodrk vk/kkfjr iz’kqYd

vk/kkj viukus ij U;k; laxr Li"Vhdj.k

dh vko';drk gSA

lkekU; {kerk vk/kkfjr iz’kqYd ls foeq[krk iÙku iz;ksxdrkZvksa ls

le;≤ ij fopkj foe'kZ ij vk/kkfjr rFkk 2009 eas fu/kkZfjr dh

xbZ nj izpkydksa ds fy, vkd"kZd ugha Fkh ftl dkj.k ls fiNyh

fufonk tkjh djus ij dksbZ tcko ugha feyk ;|fi fufonk dks rhu ckj

c<k;k x;k FkkA

¼c½ iz’kqYd ekxZnf'kZdk 2005 dh /kkjk 7-2

dk vuqlj.k djrs gq, bl izkf/kdj.k us

futh izpkydksa }kjk gkCkZj eksckby Øsu

¼,p ,e lh½ izpkyu ds iz’kqYd dh

mPpre lheknj dk fu/kkZj.k fd;k gSA ;s

futh izpkykd eq[; iÙku U;klksa ij

izpkyu djrs gSa tSls U;w eSaxykSj iksVZ VªLV

¼,u ,e ih Vh½ oh vks fpnEojkuj iksVZ

VªLV ¼oh vks lh ih Vh½ vkSj

fo'kk[kkiV~Vue iksVZVªLV ¼oh ih Vh½ vkSj

lh ,Q ,l ds ekeys esa oQj ;kMZ lqfo/kk

tks tokgj yky usg: iksVZ VªLV ¼ts ,u

ih Vh½ ij gS, ih ih Vh dks vuqjks/k fd;k

x;k fd vius izLrko dk foxr fofHkUu

izpkydksa }kjk okLrfod ;krk;kr izgLru

ds vykok ,p ,e lh dh lkekU; {kerk

ds vk/kkj ij iquokZyksdu djsA ;g

mYys[kuh; gS fd fnlEcj] 2009 esa ih ih

Vh ij fdjk;k iz’kqYd ds fu/kkZj.k djrs

le; ,p ,e lh dh lkekU; {kerk ds

vk/kkj ij fu/kkZfjr fd;s Fks rFkk ;s ml

le; ih ih Vh us izLrkfor fd;s FksA ,p

,e lh dh lkekU; {kerk dks fudkyus ds

fy, ogh fof/k viukuh pkfg, A

22-9-2014 dh la;qDr lquokbZ ds ifj.kkeLo:Ik u;k IkzLrko rS;kj fd;k

x;kA la’kksf/kr izLrko rS;kj dj fn;k x;k gSA

Ikh ih Vh us dsoy izpkydksa }kjk izfro"kZ

ds vk/kkj ij ,p ,e lh }kjk o"kZ

2007&08 ls 2013&14 esa dkxks± izgLru

dk fooj.k fn;k gS bl laca/k esa ih ih Vh

izR;sd izpkyd }kjk 70% iz;ksx ds ckn

vkSlru izfrfnu izgLrj nj mtkxj djsA

(24 ?kaVs * 70%=16.80 ?kaVs) rhu eq[;

Jsf.k;ksa ds fy, tSls&Mªkb oYd] czsd oYd

rFkk vU;] vyx ls 2007-08 ls 2013-14

ds fy, djsA

70% iz;ksx ij] o"kkZuqlkj vkSlru oFkZ fnu izgLru nj rhu eq[;

Jsf.k;ksa esa gS tSls&Mªkb oYd] czsd oYd rFkk vU;] izpkydksa }kjk izkIr

dh xbZ gS] fuEu izdkj gS%&

¼v½ Mªkb oYd dkxks±

Øe

la-

Ok’kZ

70% iz;ksx ij izpkyd }kjk vkSlru izgLru nj

izfrfnu Vu@fnu

Tks ,l

ih ,y

Lkh vkj

bZ MCY;w

Lkh

vkj bZ

MCY;w

vks ,l

vks ,l ,y

2009&10

8942

6174

2010&11

11554

8688

2011&12

13232

11827

2012&13

9768

8076

9366

7088

2013&14

10102

9539

8088

10793

8914

¹Hkkx IIIµ[k.M 4º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vlk/kj.k

¼c½ czsd oYd dkxks±

Øe

la-

Ok"kZ

70% iz;ksx ij izpkyd }kjk vkSlru

izgLru nj izfrfnu Vu@fnu

Tks ,l ih

Lkh

vkj

bZ MCY;w

Lkh vkj

bZ MCY;w

vks ,l

2009&10

498

2010&11

779

2011&12

673

2012&13

609

2013&14

428

506

¼l½ vU; dkxks±

Øe

la-

Ok"kZ

70% iz;ksx ij izpkyd }kjk vkSlru izgLru

nj izfrfnu Vu@fnu

Tks

ih ,y

Lkh vkj

bZ MCyw

Lkhvkj

bZ MCyw

vks ,l

2009&10

2010&11

2011&12

596

664

2012&13

756

2013&14

526

508

fQj Hkh ihihVh izR;sd o"kZ esa ,d ,p,elh rFkk lgk;d ds rkSj ij

,d vfrfjDRk ,p ,Ek lh dk izLrko dj jgh gSA ftlds fy, vyx

dkxks± dh miyC/krk izHkkfor gksxhA

¼v½ ,d ,p ,p lh dh i¡wth dher 37

djksM+ ds vykok ihihVh us blds fofHkUu

nsunkjksa viÝUV izhfe;e rFkk dy iqtsZ

dqy feykdj 9-50 djksM+ ,p ,e lh dh

dher esa tksM+ fn;s gSaA bl lEcU/k esa ;gk¡

;g dguk mfpr gS fd midj.k dh

dher ds vykok ¼LFkkukiu ds le; rd½

dksbZ vkSj dher midj.k dh iw¡th dher

esa lekfgr ugha dh tkrhA ,sls izLrko

leku :Ik ls fofHkUu iÙku U;klksa tSls

Åij of.kZr gS rFkk ih ih Vh Hkh mlesa

,d gS] esa ,p ,Ek lh dk lkekU; fdjk;k

iz’kqYd fu/kkZfjr djrs le; viuk;s x;s

FksA

¼2009 esa ,p ,e lh ds fdjk;k iz’kqYd

dk fu/kkZj.k½

22-9-2014 dh la;qDr lquokbZ ds ifj.kkeLo:Ik la’kksf/kr izLrko cuk;k

x;k gSA

¼c½

mi;qZDr ls fcuk izfrdwy gq, ihihVh

fuEufyf[kr dks mtkxj djsA Li’V djs

RkFkk U;k; laxr Bgjk,A

¼i½ ih ih Vh dk izLrko] dqN fuf’pr

ekun.Mksa ij ,p ,e lh ds iz’kqYd

fu/kkZj.k dk gS] 2005 iz’kqYd ekxZnf’kZdk esa

dksbZ ekun.M mYysf[kr ugha gSA ;fn o"kZ

2008 dh cgqmn~ns’kh; dkxks± oFkZ gsrq]

viÝUV iz’kqYd fu/kkZj.k ekxZnf’kZdk dk

lUnHkZ fy;k tk, ftlesa midj.k dh iwath

dher ds 5% esa fofHkUu izdkj dh dhers

ftlesa dk;Z’khy iw¡th dk vfrjsd Hkh

‘kkfey gS dks lekfgr fd;k x;k gSA

Ikh ih Vh us vU; [kpsZ Hkh midj.k dh

22-9-2014 dh la;qDr lquokbZ ds ifj.kkeLo:Ik la’kksf/kr izLrko cuk;k

x;k ¼fQj Hkh ih ih Vh us fofHkUu nsunkfj;ksa dh en rFkk dy iqtks± dh

en dks Øsu dh iw¡th dher ls utjvankt ugha fd;k gS tSlk fd

la’kksf/kr izLrko esa gSA½

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY

[PART III—SEC. 4]

vftZr dher ds 5% ds cjkcj ekus gSa] ;fn

,slk gksrk gS rc fofHkUu nsunkjksa rFkk dy

iqtkZsa dks vyx ls tksMus ij nks ckj

fxurh gks tk,xhA blfy, ihihVh fLFkfr

Li’V djs fd 150 yk[k dk fofHkUu

nsunkfj;ksa ds fy, 2 ekg dk D;k vk/kkj

gS] rFkk 50 yk[k ds dy iqtks± dk

dk;kZUo;u esa lg;ksx D;k gS\

¼ii½ fdlh fo’ks"k lsok iznkrk fd fcuk

lkEkkU; iz’kqYd fu/kkZj.k dh vko”;drk

gSA ih ih Vh Li"V djs fd 750 yk[k ,d

ckj dk viÝaV izhfe;e ,d lsok iznkrk

}kjk fd;k vkHkkf’kr gksrk gS rFkk /kkjk 7-2

ds nk;js esa cSBrk gSA

750 yk[k foxr fufonk izfØ;k ls fy, x;s Fks ysfdu la’kksf/kr izLrko

esa ea=ky; ds funZs’kkuqlkj utjvankt dj fn, x,A

,p ,e lh dk HkkMk iz’kqYd fu;feRk djrs

le; fofHkUu eq[; iÙku U;klksa tSls fd

Åij fn;s x;s gSa] ihihVh ds ekeys lfgr

¼2009 esa ,p ,e lh dk HkkM+k fu/kkZj.k½

b±/ku dh dher 70 yhVj izfr ?kaVk 4000

?kaVs izfro"kZ dks vk/kkj cukdj ekuh xbZ

gSA bl lEcU/k esa ihihVh ls vuqjks/k gS fd

0-08 yhVj izfr Vu ds miHkksx v/kkj dks

U;k; laxr Bgjk,A

0-08 yhVj izfr Vu dh lax.kuk 70 yhVj izfr ?kaVk ds miHkksx

Qkbfyax ?kVd dks 0-9 ekurs gq,] dkxks± ?kuRo 0-8 vkSj 32 lkbZfdy

izfr ?kaVk ds lkFk xzso {kerk 37 lh oh ,e gSA miHkksx nj mfpr gS

RkFkk ;g dkMyk dh rqyuk esa de gSA

mMhlk LVsohtslZ fy ¼vks ,l ,y½ us

viuh fVIIk.kh es dgk gS ftldh izfr ih

ih Vh dks vxzsf’kr dh tk pqdh gS fd

voewY;u dEiuh ,DV 2013 ds vuqlkj

18-10% gksuk gh pkfg,A ih ih Vh] vks ,l

,y ds lq>ko ij iqu% dk;Z djs rFkk

voewY;u dEiuh ,DV 2013 ds izkok/kkuksa

ds vuq:Ik gksA

mMhlk LVsohtslZ ds dFku dks /;ku esa j[kdj voewY;u dh la’kksf/kr

lax.kuk ih ih Vh }kjk dh x;h gSA

¼v½ ihihVh ;g lqfuf’pr djs fd blds

}kjk ekuh x;h ykblsal ’kqYd dh nj tks

ihihVh us lax.kuk dh gS] c<s gq, ?kVd

dks mfpr nj ls feykdj ihihVh ij

izpfyr vk/kkj nj ds leku gSA ihihVh

viuh vk/kkj nj esas ykblsal iz’kqYd ds

lanHkZ dks Hkh bafxr djsA

Øe la[;k 1 ¼v½ /kkjk 2.13 ykblsal ’kqYd ¼ist 20 vk/kkj nj 2011½

ds vuqlkj] ,p,elh }kjk ?ksjs x;s LFkku ds eqrkfcd ykblsal iz’kqYd

j[kk x;k gSA o`f¼ ?kVd dks ugha ekuk x;k gSA blds dqy ;ksx dks

c<k;k x;k gS D;ksafd ,p ,e lh }kjk izpkyu ds fy, iz;ksx fd;k

x;k {ks=Qy izLrko esa fn;s x;s {ks=Qy ls vf/kd gSA

¼c½ tSlk fd ihihVh dks irk gS fd

ihihVh ij ,p,elh ds iz’kqYd dh nj dk

fu/kkZj.k fnukad 30 fnlEcj] 2009 ds

iz’kqYd vkns’k ds }kjk ,p,elh ds

ykblsal o"kZ dk vkns’k le; 7 eghus FkkA

bl lEcU/k esa 30 fnLkEcj] 2009 ds

iz’kqYd vkns’k ds vuqPNsn 12 ¼vi½ ¼c½ ¼v½

dks lanfHkZr fd;k tk ldrk gSA ,slk gksrs

gq, ihihVh us ykblsal ’kqYd dks 12 eghus

ds fy, ekuk] ihihVh bldk U;k; laxr

mRrj nsA

Ykblsal iz’kqYd 12 eghus ds fy, fy;k x;k D;ksafd ,p,elh izpkydksa

}kjk ?ksjk x;k {ks=] tc j[kj[kko u gks rc LVksj ds fy, iz;ksx gksrk

gSA ckn esa ihihVh us vius 19 uoEcj] 2014 ds bZ esy ¼ist 189@c½ esa

dgk gS fd ,p,elh izpkydksa }kjk ykblsal iz’kqYd fcuk fdlh foPNsn

ds ekfld vk/kkj ij ns; gSA

¹Hkkx IIIµ[k.M 4º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vlk/kj.k

ihihVh] o"kZ ds vk/kkj ij] ,p,elh }kjk

o"kZ 2010&11 ls 2013&14 ds izgLru dk

vkSlr izfr’kr bafxr djsa ftlesa fon’kh

rFkk rVorhZ dkxks± gksA

Øe

la-

o"kZ

dkxks± izgLru

Vu@ o"kZ

Ikzfr’kr

fons'kh

rVorhZ

dqy

fons’kh

rVorhZ

2010&11 4011780

117044

4128824

97-17

2-83

2011&12 4903255

69710

4972965

98-60

1-40

2012&13 6922181

59093

6981274

99-15

0-85

2013&14 5719910

34985

5754895

99-39

0-61

,p,elh }kjk fons’kh rFkk rVorhZ dkxks± izgLru bl izdkj gS%&

¼v½ 2009 esa] ihihVh ij HkkMk iz’kqYd r;

djrs oDr izfrfnu ds Øsu ds izn’kZu dk

iz’kqYd] vyx ls izR;sd izdkj ds dkxks±

ds fy, vyx ls j[kk x;k Fkk tSls Mªkb

cYd dkxksZ] czsd cYd dkxks± rFkk vU;

dkxksZA fopkfjr izLrko RkFkk mMhlk LVsoh

MkslZ fyfeVsM }kjk fVIi.kh] ihihVh us ,d

lkekU; izn’kZu vk/kkfjr nj lHkh dkxks±

tSls Mªkb cYd dkxksZ] czds dkxks± rFkk

vU; dkxks± gsrq izLrkfor dh gSA fiNys

iz’kqYd fu/kkZj.k ds oDr viuk;s x;s jkLrs

ls foeq[k gksus dk dkj.k vLi"V gSA

ihihVh izn’kZu ls tqMs HkkMk Ikz’kqYd dks

izR;sd izdkj ds dkxks± tSls Mªkb cYd

dkxksZ] czds dkxks± rFkk vU; ds fy,

izLrkfor djsaA

izn’kZu ls tqM+k HkkM+k iz’kqYd izR;sd izdkj ds dkxks± tSls Mªkb cYd

dkxksZ] czds dkxks± rFkk vU; dk izLrko layXu gSA

¼c½ ihihVh Ck<ksrjh dk izLrko dher

bZMsDl ds 60% ds cnyko rd, ihihVh

ds izkstsDVl ds fy, mPpre 3% Fkk A

ihihVh bl lEcU/k esa, fuEufyf[kr dks

Li"V djas A

(i)

ihihVh dk izLrko iz’kqYd

ekxZnf’kZdk 2005 ds v/khu fopkfjr gSA

,slk gksus ij ihihVh Li"V djsa fd D;k

;g lgh gksxk fd iz’kqYd dks dher

bZMsDl ds 60% ds cnyko rd j[kk tk,

tSlk fd 2008 dh ekxZ nf’kZdk esas gSA

Ck<ksrjh dk izLrko tks dher dher bZMsDl ds 60% ij gS] ihihVh ds

lHkh izkstsDV ds fy, 2008 dh lEiw.kZ ekxZ nf’kZdk dh /kkjk 2-8 ds

vuqlkj gSA

(ii)

Ck<ksrjh dks 3 % rd izfrcfU/kr

j[kus dks Li"V djsa A

3 % rd izfrcfU/kr j[kuk Ck<ksrjh mPpre dh lhek ds fy, gSA

bl laca/k esa HkkM+k iz’kqYd 82-45 izfr eh-

Vu tks iRru }kjk fudkyk x;k gS dks]

700 Vu izfrfnu ls Åij ds mRiknu ds

vkSlr ds fy, vk/kkj fy;k x;k gSA bl

lEcU/k esa ;g /;ku nsus ;ksX; gS fd

ihihVh ij 2009 esa HkkM+k iz’kqYd fu/kkZfjr

djrs le; MªkbZ dkxkZs ds mRiknu dk osap

ekfdZsx Lrj] MªkbZ cYd dkxkZs gsrq 12500

Vu izfrfnu] czsd CkYd dkxks± ds fy,

6000 Vu vkSj vU; ds fy, 3750 Vu

FkkA lHkh izdkj ds dkxks± ds izn’kZu dh]

7000 Vu izfrfnu ls uhps csap ekfdZax dks

U;k;laxr :Ik ls Li"V fd;k tk;A tSlk

fd ohlk LVhy fyfeVsM ¼ohlh,y½ vkSj

ohlk ludksØ fyfeVsM ¼oh,llh,y½ us

7000 Vu izfrfnu dh ek=k dk fu/kkZfjr iz;ksxdrkZvksa vkSj izpkydksa dh

lqfo/kk ds vuqlkj j[kk x;k gS rkfd dksbZ fookn u gksA fQj Hkh dqN

LVkso 2009 dh ekxZ nf’kZ;ksa ds leku j[ks x;s gSaA

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY

[PART III—SEC. 4]

tSlk fd Åij of.kZr gS ihihVh la’kksf/kr izLrko j[k pqdk gSA cnyko ,p,elh dh iawth dher ifjorZu rd gSA

ftldk dkj.k 2 vfrfjDr xzsOl vkSj dk;Z’khy iw¡th dh en esa ifjorZu gS] ftldk ifj.kke ifjpkyu dher esa vUrj ftldh

lax.kuk iw¡th dher ds izfr’kr ds fglkc ls dh tkrh gSA ihihVh us voewY;u dks Hkh 18-10% ekuk gS tcfd igys ;s mls

10-34% eku pqds gSaA tqykbZ] 2014 ds izkjafHkd izLrko rFkk flrEcj 2014 ds la’kksf/kr izLrko dh rqyukRed fLFkfr uhps

lkj.kh c¼ dh xbZ gS%&

Øe

la-

fooj.k

ekud

IkzkjfEHkd izLrko

tqykbZ] 2014

Lka’kksf/kr flrEcj] 2014 dk

izLrko

yk[k esa

100 Vu gkcZj eksckby Øsu

dh dher ¼yk[k½

¼MCY;w Mh oh½

¼2963-70 okLrfod½

3700-00

3900-00

vU; [kpsZ ¼e’khu lapkyu

ds fy, vU; vko’;d

lqfo/kk,a] viQaV izhfe;e

C;kt rFkk dk;Z’khy iw¡th

vfrjsd ds lkFk½

vU; [kpkZsa dk

fooj.k

Ykk[k esa

fofHkUu

nsunkfj;kWa

¼2eghus½

150-00

viÝaV

izhfe;e

750-00

dy iqtsZ

50-000

dqy

950-00

Ykk[k esa

fofHkUu

nsunkfj;kWa

¼2 eghus½

150-00

dy iqtsZ

50-000

dqy

200-00

dqy iw¡th dh dher

4650-00

4100-00

Okkf"kZd {kerk fefy;u Vu

esa

2-00

III

izpkyu dh dher

¼v½

bZ/ku dh dher ¼okLrfodrk

vuqlkj½

0-08 yh-

izfrVu nj

72@& izfr

yh-

115-20

ns[kk fd izfrfnu mRiknu dh csap ekfdZsx

dks fuEu Lrj ij j[kuk iksr ds nwljs

nkSjksa ds le; dks c<k;sxk ftlls blls

tqM+s vU; [kpks± esa c<ksrjh gksxhA ihihVh

dks HkkMk iz’kqYd ds fy, bl izLrko esa

,p,plh csap ekfdZax Lrj 12500 Vu MªkbZ

cYd dkxks± 6000 Vu LVhu ,.M vkSlr

dkxks± rFkk 3750 Vu vU;ksa ds fy, dk

vuqlj.k djuk pkfg,A ftldk ,p,elh

dk HkkMk iz’kqYd fu/kkZj.k esa vU; iRruksa

ij Hkh leku :Ik ls vuqdj.k gksrk gSA

gekjs] 23 tqykbZ] 2014 ds i= ds ek/;e

ls vuqjks/k djus ds ckotwn ihihVh us

izLrkfor njksa dks ykxw djus okyh ’krs±

izLrkfor ugha dh gSA ihihVh ,p,elh

}kjk izgLru fd;s tkus okys izR;sd] izdkj

ds izLrkfor dkxks± ds iznZ’ku ls tqMs

iz’kqYd dh olwyh dks ’kkflr djus okyh

’krZ izLrkfor djsaA

izLrkfor njksa ds ykxw djus dks ’kkflr djus okyh ’krs± layXu gSA

¹Hkkx IIIµ[k.M 4º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vlk/kj.k

¼c½

ejEer o j[kj[kko dher

midj.k dh dher ds 5%

dh nj ls

¼Vh , ,e ih ds

vuqlkj½

Ek’khujh midj.k dh dher

ds 5% ij

3700 yk[k

185-00

3900 yk[k

195-00

¼l½

Ckhek

¼Vh , ,e ih ds vuqlkj½

Ek’khujh midj.k dh dher

ds 1% ds cjkcj

3700 yk[k

37-00

1% 3900 yk[k

39-00

¼n½

voewY;u

¼Vh , ,e ih ds vuqlkj½

dEiuh ,DV ds izko/kkuksa ds

vuqlkj

10-34%

3700 yk[k

382-58

18-10% MCY;w Mh oh

3900 yk[k ij

492-60

¼/k½

Ykkblsal ’kqYd

vk/kkj nj ds vuqlkj

1200 izfr

eghuk

12 eghus

0-14

1200 izfr eghuk

12 eghus

0-72

¼u½

vU; [kpsZ 5% dh nj ls

¼Vh , ,e ih ds vuqlkj½

vftZr LFkkbZ lEifr dh

dher dk 5%

5% 700

yk[k

185-0

5% 3900 yk[k

195-00

dqy Øe la[;k (v) ls

¼u½

904-92

1037-52

voewY;u ds lkeatL; ds

ckn vkj vks lh bZ 16% dh

nj ls

yxkbZ xbZ iw¡th dk 16%

16%

4650 yk[k

744-00

16%

4100 yk[k dk

656-00

dqy dher rFkk fuos’k ij

okilh

II+IV

1648-92

yk[k

2 fefy;u

1639-52

izfr f’k¶V mPpnj

VII

mPp nj izfr Vu ¼fons’kh½

1648-92

yk[k@2

fefy;u Vu

82--45

1693-52 yk[k

2 fefy;u Vu

84-68

VIII

mPPk nj izfr Vu ¼rVorhZ½

60%

82-85

49-47

60%, 84-68

50-81

8-1

lanfHkZr ekeys dh la;qDr lquokbZ 22 flrEcj] 2014 dks ihihVh ds Hkqous”oj ifjlj esa gqbZ FkhA ihihVh us vius

izLrko dk ,d laf{kIr ikoj IokabV iztsUVs’ku fn;k FkkA la;qDr lquokbZ esa ihihVh laEcfU/kr iz;ksxdÙkkZvksa laLFkkuksa@lsok

iznkrkvksa us viuk i{k j[kkA

8-2

tSlk fd la;qDr lquokbZ esa fu.kZ; gqvk Fkk ihihVh dks] gekjs fnukad 25 flrEcj] 2014 ds ek/;e ls vuqjks/k fd;k

x;k fd dqN fcUnqvksa ij dkjZokgh djsaA blds tokc esa ihihVh us vius doj i= 30 flrEcj] ds ek/;e ls tokc fn;kA

la;qDr lquokbZ esa dkjZokgh ds tks fcUnq fu/kkZfjr fd;s x;s rFkk mlds ckn ihihVh ds mÙkj uhps lkj.khc} gSaA

Øe

la-

Laka;qDr lquokbZ esa fuf.kZr eqnsa

ih ih Vh ds mRrj

(i)

Lka;qDr lquokbZ esa mifLFkr miHkksDrkvksa us ihihVh }kjk

fudkys x;s ,p ,e lh ds izfr Vu fMLpktZ nj ij

vfu”prrk tkfgj dhA lquokbZ ds nkSjku ihihVh us fMLpktZ

nj yxHkx 7000 ekuus dk mYys[k fd;k dqN iz;ksxdÙkkZvksa

dk er Fkk fd 7000 Vu izfrfnu fMLpktZ nj de gSA bl

lEcU/k esa] ihihVh bl laca/k esa fMLpktZ nj dh leh{kk djus

ds fy, lger gqvk FkkA blfy, ihihVh blds izkjEHk ds

izLrko dh ,p ,elh dh fMLpktZ nj dh leh{kk djus ds

fy, lger gqvk FkkA blfy, ihihVh blds izkjEHk ds izLrko

dh ,p ,e lh dh fMLpktZ nj dh leh{kk djsa A

fMLpktZ nj tks 6000 Vu ekuh xbZ Fkh 7000 Vu

ekuh tk ldrh gS tSls fd dbZ iz;ksxdÙkkZvksa us

dgk gSA ;g fMLpktZ nj ,d nj ij vkus gsrq

iz;ksx dh tk ldrh gSA fQj Hkh vPNh fMLpktZ nj

ij izpkydksa dks iqjLdkj rFkk rFkk de nj ij

nf.Mr fd;k tk ldrk gSA

(ii)

viÝUV Hkqxrku ds lEcU/k esa tSlk fd ihihVh us iw¡th vnn

ekuk gS rFkk la;qDr lquokbZ esa lgefr nh gSA ihihVh

ea=ky; ls izkIr fyf[kr vuqns’kksa dh izfr tks viÝUV

Hkqxrku ds ckjs esa ,d O;fDr desVh dh flQkfj’kksa ij

vk/kkfjr gS dks mtkxj djsaA

ihihVh ds }kjk mtkxj fd;s x, nLrkost dh izfr

,d i= gS tks 24 tqykbZ] 2014 dks fMIVh lsdsVªh

fefuLVªh vkQ f’kfiax ¼,e vks ,l½ ls izkIr gqvk gSA

tks e’khuhdj.k izkslsl ,V ihihVh ds vk/kkj ij gS

crk;k x;k gS fd ihihVh dks fdu fcUnqvksa ij

dk;Zokgh djuh gSA viÝUV Hkqxrku ls lEcfU/kr

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY

[PART III—SEC. 4]

dk;ZfcUnq tks ,e vks ,l ds i= esa gS oSls gh uhps

fn;k x;k gSA

ikjknhi iÙku dks jktLo Hkkx ekMy dks :dkoV

ds fy, n.M /kkjk ds lkFk viukuk pkfg,A tSlk

fd vU; eq[; iÙkuksa }kjk u;s VsaMj esa ikyu fd;k

tk jgk gS u fd viÚaUV ’kqYd ,d=hdj.k] jktLo

Hkkx ,d=hdj.k ;k dsoy viÝUV ’kqYd bR;kfnA

dsoy jktLo Hkkx ,d=hdj.k ekWMy gh Øsu

iznkrkvksa esa izfr;ksfxrk dh Hkkouk iSnk dj ldrk

gSA

(iii)

Lka;qDr lquokbZ esa ihihVh us dgk Fkk fd iw¡th dher 37

djksM+ ,d xzso ds lkFk ,d ,p,elh dh dher gSA tcfd

ihihVh dks fujUrj izpkyu gsrq nks vkSj xzso pkfg,A ihihVh

nks vkSj xzso dh dher tksM+us gsrq vius izLrko dh leh{kk ds

fy, lger gqvk FkkA blfy, ihihVh ,p,elh dh iwath

dher dks la’kksf/kr djds RkFkk la’kksf/kr izLrko la’kksf/kr

dk;Zokgh ds lkFk izLrqr djsaA

fcUnq dher dks la’kks/ku ds fy, ys fy;k x;k gSA

9-1

la;qDr lquokbZ ds ckn lhost f’kfiax ,.M ykftLVd fyfeVsM us vius fnukad 23 flrEcj] 2014 ds i= }kjk vius

fopkj izxV fd;sA of.kZr i= esa ,l ,l,y,y us dgk fd la;qDRk lquokbZ esa izkf/kdj.k ds ps;jeSu rFkk ihihVh ds ps;jeSu

us mtkxj fd;k Fkk fd ,p,elh dk iz’kqYd 1000@& izfr daVsUkj izfr ifjogu ihihVh ij gksxk tSlk fd igys ,p,elh

izpkydksa dks Hkqxrku fd;k tkrk FkkA bl lanHkZ esa ,l,y,y us bl izkf/kdj.k dks vuqjks/k fd;k fd ,p,elh ds daVsuj

izgLru iz’kqYd nj fu/kkZj.k gsrq ldqZyj tkjh djs tSlk fd ehfVax esa muds iksr lapkydksa dks larq’V djus gsrq mn~?kks’k fd;k

x;k FkkA

9-2

Åij dgs x;s i= fnukad 23 flrEcj] 2014 dh izfr ihihVh dks gekjs i= fnukad 26 flrEcj 2014 }kjk vxszf’kr

dh x;h Fkh ftlesa mudh fo’ks"k fVIi.kh ekaxh xbZ FkhA ihihVh us vius 20 vDrwcj] 2014 ds i= }kjk] vU; iz;ksxdÙkkZvksa dh

fVIi.kh dk tcko nsrs gq, mYysf[kr fd;k fd ,p,elh ds }kjk daVsuj izgLru dh nj la’kksf/kr dh tk pqdh gS rFkk

flrEcj] 2014 ds la’kksf/kr izLrko esa mYysf[kr dh x;h gSA

10-

izdj.k esa ijke’kZ ls lacaf/kr izfØ;k,a bl izkf/kdj.k ds dk;kZy; esa fjdkMZ ij miyC/k gSaA izkIr dh xbZ fVIif.k;ksa

vkSj laca} i{kksa }kjk dh xbZ ftjg ds lkjka’k lacaf/kr i{kksa dks vyx ls fHktok;s tk,axsA ;s gekjh osclkbV

http://tariffauthority.gov.in. ij Hkh miyC/k gSA

11-

izdj.k ij dkjZokbZ ds nkSjku ,df=r dh xbZ lwpuk dh lexzrk ds lanHkZ ls fuEufyf[kr fLFkfr mHkjrh gSA

¼i½

ØsUk lacaf/kr lqfo/kk dk izko/kku egkiÙku U;kl vf/kfu;e 1963 dh /kkjk 48 esa lwphc¼ lsokvksa esa ls ,d

gS vo,o ØsUk laca/kh lqfo/kk iznku djus gsrq iz’kqYd dks bl izkf/kdj.k }kjk fu;fer fd;k tkuk gSA

egkiÙku U;kl vf/kfu;e 1963 dh /kkjk 48 ds lkFk ifBr /kkjk 42¼4½ esa vis{kk dh xbZ gS fd egkiÙku

U;kl vf/kfu;e 1963 dh /kkjk 42¼3½ ds vUrxZr vf/kd`r O;fDr;ksa }kjk iznÙk fof’k"V lsokvksa ds laca/k esa

njksa dks ;g izkf/kdj.k vf/klwfpr djsa] mu ekeyksa esa tgka /kkjk 42¼3½ ds vUrxZr izkf/kdj.k O;oLFkk ch vks

Vh dU’kslu ,xzheSaV ls brj jkLrs ls dh xbZ gS] ogka ekpZ 2005 ds iz’kqYd ekxZn’khZ dh /kkjk 7-2 bl

izkf/kdj.k ls vis{kk djrh gS fd og vyx&vyx lsok iznkÙkkvksa ds lanHkZ ds fcuk ,slh lsokvksa ds fy,

mPpre nj r; djsa ftls laca/k iÙkuksa ij leku :Ik ls ykxw fd;k tk,A ;g Lej.k jgs fd ih ih Vh nj

gkcZj eksckby ØsUk ¼,p ,e lh½ ds iz;ksx ds fy, lkekU; mPpre iz’kqYd r; djus dk vH;kl fnlacj]

2009 esa fd;k tk pqdk FkkA vc fQj ih ih Vh fcuk fdlh O;fDrxr lsok iznkrk dks lanHkZ esa j[krs gq, ih

ih Vh ij ,p ,e lh ds iz;ksx ds fy, ,d lkekU; iz’kqYd nj r; djus dk izLrko yk;h gSA ;|fi ih

ih Vh bl ckjs esa dqN ugha crkrh fd bldk izLrko vuqPNsn 7-2 ds vUrxZr gS ;g Lohdkjuk pkfg, fd

izeq[k egkiÙku U;kl ij lkekU; mPpre nj dk r; gksuk 2005 ds iz’kqYd ekxZn’khZ dh /kkjk 7-2 ls

’kkflr gksA

¼ii)

tks iz’kqYd fnlacj] 2009 esa r; fd;k x;k Fkk mldh oS/krk tuojh] 2013 esa lekIr gks xbZ gSA fnlEcj]

2009 dk iz’kqYd vkns’k eqdneksa ls Hkjk gqvk Fkk rFkk dfFkr vkns’k ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; mM+hlk }kjk

jn~n fd;k tk pqdk gS rFkk bl izkf/kdj.k }kjk mPp U;k;ky; ds vkns’k dks pqukSrh nsus okyh ekuuh;

mPp U;k;ky; esa nk;j ;kfpdk Hkh [kkfjt dh tk pqdh gSA vr,o fnlEcj] 2009 ds iz’kqYd vkns’kds

vUrZxr iz’kqYd pØ ds fy, gS vkSj Øsu ds orZeku ykxr ij vk/kkfjr gSA ,d ubZ Øsu mRikndrk ds

ekud o fo’oluh;rk dks cuk, j[ksxh rFkk :dkoV le; dks de djsxhA

(iii)

ih ih Vh us ’kq: esa viuk izLrko 2014 esa nk;j fd;kA ckn esa gekjs }kjk mi;ksxdÙkkZvksa@lsok iznkrkvksa

ds lkFk la;qDr lquokbZ ds nkSjku gq, fopkj&foe’kZ ds vk/kkj ij mBk, x;s lokyksa dk tokc nsrs gq, ih

ih Vh us la’kksf/kr izLrko nk;j fd;k gSA tSlk fd igys crk;k x;k gS] la’kks/ku dks eq[; rkSj ij nks vad

¹Hkkx IIIµ[k.M 4º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vlk/kj.k

vfrfjDRk xzScks dh dher rFkk dkedj iwath ?kVd esa cnyko dks /;ku es j[krs gq, ,p ,e lh dh iwath

ykxr esa cnyko dh lhek rd ns[kk tkuk gS] tks bl izdkj lapkfyr ykxrksa esa cnyko ykrh gSA o

ftldh x.kuk iwath ykxr ds rkSj ij dh tk ldrh gSA blds }kjk fopkfjr ewY;ákl dh nj esa Hkh dqN

cnyko izLrkfor fd;s tk pqds gSA ih ih Vh }kjk bl izdj.k ds izlaLdj.k ds nkSjku nh xbZ lwpuk@

izek.ki=ksa dk flrEcj] 2014 ds bl la’kksf/kr izLrko ds lkFk bl fo’ys"k.k esa fopkj fd;k tkrk gSA

¼iv½

2005 dh iz’kqYd ekxZnf’kZ;ksa dh /kkjk 2-4-1 iÙku izpkyuksa ds izR;sd vo;o dh ekud laca/kh ykxr dk

fodkl djus ds fy, iz;kl djus dh lnk vis{kk djrh gSA ,p ,e lh ds iz;ksx gsrq iz’kqYd r; djus ds

fy, dksbZ Hkh fof’k"V ekxZn’kZu u gh 2005 dh iz’kqYd ekxZnf’kZ;ksa vkSj u gh 2008 ds iz’kqYd ekxZnf’kZ;ksa esa

vf/kdfFkr dh xbZ gSA

mDr ekxZnf’kZ;ksa dh /kkjk 7-2] ftlds rgr izLrko fopkj.kh; gS] lkQ rkSj ij iz’kqYd r; djus dh dksbZ

fo’ks"k iz.kkyh ugha crkrh cfYd fcuk lapkyd dk fopkj fd, fcuk iz’kqYd izLrkoksa ds Qkbfyax ,oa iz’kqYd

r; djus ds fofHkUu dk;Zfof/kd vk;keksa ds ckjs esa crkrh gSA pwafd /kkjk 2-4-1 ds vUrxZr ekudksa dk vyx

leqPp; fodflr fd;k x;k gS] 2008 ds iz’kqYd ekxZnf’kZ;ksa esa fu/kkZfjr ekudksa ij gh ih ih Vh }kjk

vaxhd`r ekudksa dh rkfdZdrk dk ijh{k.k djus gsrq Hkjkslk fd;k x;k gS] ;g mYys[kuh; gS fd nwljs izeq[k

iÙku U;klksa ij ,p ,e lh ds fy, iz’kqYd r; djus gsrq lacaf/kr ekeyksa esa ,p ,e lh ¼2005 ds

ekxZnf’kZ;ksa dh /kkjk 7-2 }kjk ’kkflr½ ds iz;ksx ds fy, iz’kqYd r; djrs le; bl izdkj dh i}fr

vaxhd`r dh xbZ gSA

¼v½

100 Vu ,p ,p lh dh {kerk%&

¼d½

,p ,e lh ds mi;ksx ds fy, izLrkfor fdjk;k HkkM+k r; djus ds fy, ih ih Vh us foxr lkr

o"kks± dh vof/k 2007&08 ls 2013&14 dks vk/kkj ekurs gq, ,d ,p ,e lh }kjk mBk;s x,

vkSlr okLrfod dkxks± dk fopkj esa j[kk gSA

¼[k½

iz’kqYd ekxZnf’kZ;ksa 2005 dh /kkjk 7-2 ds vuqlkj vkSj bl izkf/kdj.k }kjk vaxhd`r lkekU;

mPpre iz’kqYd r; djus dh i}fr dk vuqlj.k djrs gq, iz’kqYd ekxZnf’kZ;ksa dh /kkjk 7-2 ds

vUrxZr futh lapkydksa }kjk dqN izeq[k iÙku U;klksa tSls uohu eaxykSj iÙku U;kl ¼,u ,e ih

Vh½ oh vks fpnkEckjukj iÙku U;kl ¼oh vks lh Vh½ vkSj fo’kk[kkiVue~ iÙku U;kl ¼oh ih Vh½ esa

,p ,e lh ds lapkyu ds fy, ih ih Vh ls fof’k"V rkSj ij ,p ,e lh dh {kerk ij vk/kkfjr

ctk; fofHkUu lsok iznkrkvksa }kjk fiNys okLrfod ;krk;kr laHkkyus dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, vius

izLrko ij leh{kk djus ds fy, izkFkZuk dh gSA bl laca/k esa ih ih Vh dks ;g Hkh bafxr fd;k

x;k Fkk fd fnlEcj] 2009 esa ih ih Vh ij ,p ,e lh ds fy, fdjk;k HkkM+k r; djus ds nkSjku

ml le; ih ih Vh }kjk izLrkfor ,p ,e lh dh ekunaM {kerk ds vk/kkj ij fdjk;k HkkM+k

fu/kkZfjr fd;k x;kA

¼x½

fof’k"V fourh ds ckotwn ih ih Vh us ,p ,Ek lh dh ekunaM {kerk ij fopkj ugha fd;k] le;

ds rids ds lkFk ykxr esa c<+krjh dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, o"kZ 2009 esa fu/kkZfjr nj o"kZ 2013 ;k

2014 esa vkd"kZd ugha gks ldrh] ysfdu ;g bu lc ekeyksa esa vuqlj.k dh tkus okyh EkkSfyd

i}fr ls fopfyr gksus dk dksbZ vk/kkj ugha gks ldrk gSA ih ih Vh ds mi;ksxdrkZvksa ds lkFk

fopkj foe’kZ ds nkSjku tks irk pyk gS rFkk ftls ekunaM {kerk ij vk/kkfjr i}fr ls fopyu

gksus dk ,d dkj.k crk;k tkrk gS] mls bl izkf/kdj.k dks miyC/k ugha djk;k x;k gSA bl

fLFkfr dks ?;ku esa j[krs gq, bl izkf/kdj.k dk ,p le lh ds fy, iz’kqYd fu/kkZj.k djus dh

ekunaM {kerk ij vk/kkfjr i}fr ftldk lHkh izeq[k iÙku U;klksa esa ,sls ekeyksa eas leku :Ik ls

vuqlj.k fd;k tkrk gS] ls fopfyr gksus dk bjknk ugha gSA fu"iknurk ls tqM+k o ekunaM i}fr

ij vk/kkfjr iz’kqYd dk fu/kkZj.k lapkyd dks lapkyuksa esa dk;Zdq’kyrk ykus ds fy, izksRlkfgr

djsxk vkSj mi;ksxdrkZvksa dh vdk;Zdq’ky lapkyuksa ls laj{k.k djrk gSA

¼?k½

ih ih Vh rhu dkxks± oxks± vFkkZr MªkbZ cYd dkxksZ] czsd cYd dkxks± o vU; dkxks± dks laHkkyus

ij fopkj djrk gSA ;|fi ih ih Vh us vf/kdre {kerk ds fu/kkZj.k ds fy, dkxks± ds fdlh Hkh

oxZ ds fy, dkxks± dks laHkkyus dh nj ij fopkj ugha fd;k x;kA izfrfnu 7]000 Vu ls Åij

mRikndrk dk lEcU/k izLrkfor 82-45 izfr Vu dh nj fdlh ekunaM ;k oSKkfud fo’ys"k.k ij

vk/kkfjr ugha gSA cfYd lsok iznkrk dh vkjkenk;drk ls esy djus ds fy, gSA vr,o bl

fo’ys"k.k esa vU; izeq[k iÙkuU;klksa esa 100 Vu ,p ,e lh ds fy, iz’kqYd esas fu/kkZj.k esa leku:Ik

ls vaxhd`r izca/ku ekun.M ds vuqlkj 12500 Vu izfrfnu MªkbZ cYd dkxks± ds izca/ku nj] 6000

Vu izfrfnu czsd cYd dkxks± ds ckjs esa rFkk 3750 Vu izfrfnu vU; dkxks± ds ckjs esa fopkj

fd;k tkrk gSA

¼M-½

izfro"kZ 4000 dk;Z ?kaVksa dks ekunaM Lrj ij dk;Z ?kaVs ekurs gq, ¼tSlk fd nwljs iÙku U;klksa ij

/kkjk 7-2 ds rgr ,p ,e lh ds iz’kqYd fu/kkZj.k ij fopkj fd;k x;k gS½ ,p ,e lh dh ekunaM

{kerk MªkbZ cYd dkxks± ds fof’"V izca/k esa 2-98 fefy;u Vu] czsd cYd dkxks± dh fof’k"V izca/k

esa 1-43 fefy;u Vu rFkk vU; dkxks± ds fof’k"V izca/k esa 0-89 fefy;u Vu fudyrs gSaA

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY

[PART III—SEC. 4]

¼vi½

iw¡th ykxr

¼d½

ih ih Vh esa 100 Vu ,p ,e lh dh iw¡th ykxr dk vuqeku 4100 yk[k yxk;k gSA bl iw¡th

ykxr esa rhu ?kVd vFkkZr~ ,p ,e lh dh ,d 37 lh ch ,e xzSc ds lkFk ykxr 3700 yk[k

vkSj 2 xzScksa dh ykxr 200 yk[k vkSj fofHkUu nsunkfj;ksas ,oa vfrfjDRk dy&iqtks± ij 200 yk[k

rd vk;s vU; [kpks± dks “kkfey fd;k tkrk gSA

¼[k½

ih ih Vh }kjk ,p ,e lh dh dher@ykxr dh lgk;rk esa fn, x, nLrkosth lk{; ,p ,Ek lh

dh ewy ykxr 34]30]000 ;wjks izfrfcfEcr djrh gSA ;krk;kr ?kVd 2]70]000 ;wjks lkFk esa

ih ih Vh }kjk fopkjkFkZ 80 izfr ;wjks fofu;e nj rFkk 25% lhek ’kqYd nj ds ?kVd dks fopkj esa

j[krs gq, ih ih Vh }kjk ,p ,Ek lh dh ykxr 3700 yk[k fudkyh tkrh gSA

bl ekeys ds fo’ys"k.k ds le; izfpfyr fofue; nj dks izfrfcfEcr djus ds fy, ,p ,e lh

dh ykxr ;krk;kr ij vk;s [kpsZ lfgr fofue; nj dks 77-09 izfr ;wjks le> dj v|ruhdj.k

fd;k x;k gSA tSlk fd ih ih Vh us izLrkfor fd;k gS ,p ,e lh ds mRifjofrZr ykxr ij

25% lhek ’kqYd dk fopkj fd;k x;k gSA

¼x½

ih ih Vh us xSzcks dh ykxr ds leFkZu esa dksbZ nLrkost lEcU/kh lk{; izLrqr ugha fd, gSa ;|fi

,d xSzcks dh fopkfjr 100 yk[k dh ykxr dks rdZlaxr ns[kk tkuk pkfg, nwljs viÝaV@lanfHkZr

iz’kqYd ekeys tgkWa xSzcks dh mi;ksfxrk ij fopkj fd;k tkrk gS o xSzcks dh fopkj.kh; ykxr ds

lanHkZ ds lkFk lR;kfir fd;k tkrk gSA blfy, bl fo’ys’k.k esa xSzcks dh ykxr ij Hkjkslk fd;k

x;k gSA

¼?k½

ih ih Vh us yxHkx 200 yk[k rd dh nwljh iw¡th ykxr ij fopkj fd;k gS ftlls fd fofHkUu

nsunkfj;ksa dks 150 yk[k o 50 yk[k ds vfrfjDr dy&iqtks± dks fn[kk;k tk;sA bl fo"k; esa ;g

yxrk gS fd ih ih Vh dk fopkj dk;Z’khy i¡wth dks lekfo"V djuk gSA vxj ekxZnf’kZ;ksa esa

fofgr cgqmn~ns’kh; dkxks± VfeZuy o vU; dkxks± VfeZuy ds fy, ekunaM dh rjQ lEcU/k ns[kk

tk, vU; phtksa ds lkFk lkFk ;g midj.k ykxr ij 5% ij vusd izdkj d i¡wth ykxr dk

eqvkotk iznku djrh gS ftlls dk;Z’khy iw¡th dhs vfrfjDr jkf’k o fuekZ.k ds nkSjku C;kt

lekfo"V gksA

¼M½

blfy, vxj 3765-41 dh vuqekfur iw¡th ykxr ds 5% dks /;ku esa j[kk tk;s ;g

188-27 yk[k fudyrh gS

¼vii½

lapkyu ykxr

¼d½

bZa/ku

nwljs iÙku U;klksa ij 100 Vu ,p ,Ek lh ds fy, ekyHkkM+k fdjk;k fu/kkZfjr djrs le;

70 yhVj izfr ?kaVk ,p ,Ek lh ds fy, 4000 ?kaVs izfro"kZ ds b±/ku miHkksx ij fopkj fd;k x;k gSA

ih ih Vh us vius izLRkko esa fQfyax ?kVd] dkxks± ?kuRo] xzSc {kerk bR;kfn dks /;ku esa j[krs gq,

0-08 yhVj izfrVu rd b±/ku ds miHkksx dk vuqeku yxk;k x;k gSA 0-08 yhVj izfrVu ds

vk/kkj ij b±/ku dk miHkksx ih ih Vh ds dFkukuqlkj 70 yhVj izfr?kaVk vk/kkfjr fopkj fd;s x;s

b±/ku miHkksx ls de gSA

mM+hlk LVsosMksjl fyfeVsM ¼vks ,l ,y½ ,oa mRdy psEcj vkWQ dWke’kZ ,aM baMLVzh ¼;w lh lh

vkbZ½ us ih ih Vh }kjk fopkj fd;s x;s b±/ku miHkksx dks vi;kZIr crk;k gSA

bl laca/k esa 70 yhVj izfr ?kaVs ds miHkksx ij fopkj djrs gq, tSlk fd nwljs ,p ,Ek lh ekeyksa

esa xkSj fd;k x;k gS ;g cYd dkxks± ds laca/k esa yxHkx 0-09 yhVj izfr Vu ¼70 yhVj izfr

?kaVk@744 Vu izfr ?kaVk½] cszd cYd dkxks± ds laca/k esa 0-19 yhVj izfr Vu ¼70 yhVj izfr

?kaVk@357 Vu izfr ?kaVk½] rFkk vU; dkxks± ds laca/k esa 0-31 yhVj izfr Vu ¼70 yhVj izfr

?kaVk@223 Vu izfr ?kaVk½ dh [kir fudkyrh gSA bl izdkj tSlk fd ih ih Vh ds }kjk Bhd gh

yk;k x;k gS fd bu miHkksx ekunaMksa dks ih ih Vh }kjk xkSj fd;s x;s 0-08 yhVj izfr Vu dh

[kir ls c<+dj ns[kk tkuk pkfg,A

bl laca/k esa ;gk¡ ;g crkuk mfpr gS fd ih ih Vh ij ,p ,Ek lh ds lHkh izdkj ds dkxks± tSls

fd MªkbZ cYd dkxksZ] cszd cYd dkxks± o vU; dkxks± ds izca/ku ij fopkj fd;k x;k gSA ,sls

ifjn`’; esa tcfd ,p ,e lh dk MªkbZ cYd dkxks± dks gSaMy djus ds fy, fo’ks’k :Ik ls iz;ksx

fd;k tkrk gS] ih ih Vh }kjk fopkj izfr Vu 0-08 yhVj dh [kir mi;qDr gks ldrh gSA

gkykafd] vxj ,p ,Ek lh dks cszd cYd dkxks± ;k vU; dkxks± dks mrkjus o p<+kus ds fy,

fof’"V :Ik ls yxk;k tkrk gS] ih ih Vh }kjk fopkj izfrVu 0-08 yhVj [kir Ik;kZIr ugha gks

ldrhA TkSlk fd vU; izeq[k iÙku U;klksa ij ,d :Ik ls fopkj leku ekeyksa dh fLFkfr dks

ns[krs gq, 4000 izfro"kZ ds fy, 70 yhVj izfr ?kaVk izfr ,p ,e lh ds b±/ku esa [kir ds fopkj

dks mfpr eglwl fd;k x;k gSA

vkerkSj ij b±/ku ykxr dk vuqeku yxkus ds fy,] lkekU; gkbZLihM Mhty dh dher ij fopkj

fd;k tkrk gSA mM+hlk ds ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; ds funsZ’kksa ds vuqikyu esa ih ih Vh esa ,p ,e

lh ds fy, iz’kqYd fu/kkZj.k ls lacaf/kr ijke’kZ dh dk;Zokgh ds nkSjku] dqN lsok iznkrkvksa us

izLrqr fd;k fd os ,p ,e lh lapkyuksa ds fy, izhfe;e Mhty dk mi;ksx djrs gSas tks lkekU;

¹Hkkx IIIµ[k.M 4º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vlk/kj.k

,p ,l Mh ls eagxk gS ftl ij ih ih Vh }kjk dksbZ vkifÙk ugha dh xbZA bl ifjn`’; esa ;g

eglwl fd;k tkrk gS fd b±/ku ykxr ij igqWpus ds fy, ekStwnk izhfe;e Mhty nj 60-83 izfr

yhVj ij fopkj fd;k tk;sA

¼[k½

ejEer o j[k&j[kko ykxr] chek ykxr vkSj vU; [kpks± esa 5% ] 1% o 5% dk ih ih Vh }kjk

,p ,Ek lh dh iw¡th ykxr esa vuqeku gSA tc vU; izeq[k iÙku U;klksa ij ,p ,Ek lh ds iz;ksx

ds fy, iz’kqYd fu/kkZj.k fd;k tkrk gS ftls mijksDr [kpks± ds vuqeku ds fy, fopkj izfr’kr ds

lkFk ns[kk tkrk gSA ;g ugha fn[krk fd ih ih Vh us mijksDr [kpks± rd igqWpus ds fy, fofo/k

iw¡th ykxr ds ?kVd ij Hkh fopkj fd;k x;k gSA

¼x½

ewY;ákl

mM+hlk LVsosMksjl fyfeVsM ¼vks ,l ,y½ }kjk dh xbZ fVIif.k;ksa dk tckc nsrs gq, ih ih Vh us

blds la’kksf/kr izLrko esa 18-10 % dk ewY;ákl ekuk gS tks dfFkr rkSj ij dEiuh vf/kfu;e

2013 ds izko/kkuksa ij vk/kkfjr gSA gkaykfd ih ih Vh us dEiuh vf/kfu;e 2013 ds ml izklkafxd

izko/kku dks lanfHkZr ugha fd;k gS ftlds vk/kkj ij 18-10 % izfro"kZ ewY;ákl fudyrk gSA

bl laca/k esa bls ;gk¡ mYys[k djuk izklafxd gS fd pSUubZ iÙku U;kl ¼lh ,p ih Vh½ ls izkIr

,p ,e lh ds mi;ksx’kqYd fu/kkZj.k ds fy, izLrko ds fuiVku ds nkSjku lh ,p ih Vh us rc

;g is’k fd;k Fkk fd dEiuh vf/kfu;e 2013 ¼vuqHkkx 123 [k.M lh ¼ds½ ¼2½ o dEiuh vf/kfu;e

2013 ds Ø e la- 6 ds vURkxZr vulwph II ds uksV ds vuqlkj½ ds vuqlkj izko/kku lq>ko nsrs gSa

fd Hkkjh fYk¶V midj.k dk mi;ksx thou 20 o"kZ ekuk tk;] ;g 5% izfro"kZ dh ewY;ákl dh

nj ls tkrh gS] gkaykfd ;g vf/kfu;e ;g Hkh lq>ko nsrk gS fd rhu ikjh lapkyu ds ekeys es

ewY;ákl nj ekStwnk nj ds 100 % c<+kbZ tk;A bldk eryc ;g gqvk fd 5% dh ewY;ákl nj

nqxuh gksdj 10% gks tkrh gSA rnuqlkj ,p ,e lh ds ekeys esa ewY;ákl dks ,p ,e lh ds

iw¡th ykxr ds 10% ij ekuk x;kA dEiuh vf/kfu;e 2013 ds izklkafxd izko/kkuksa ds ladsr ds

vkHkko esa ftlds vk/kkj ij ih ih Vh us 18-10 % izfro"kZ ewY;ákl fudkyk, ij fopkj djus dh

fLFkfr esa ugha gSA vr,o ;g lh ,p ih Vh }kjk rc fn;s x;s izlax ds vk/kkj ij 10% izfro"kZ

ekuh tkrh gSA

¼?k½

ykblsal ’kqYd

iÙku dh tehu ds fy, ykblsal ’kqYd dks lacaf/kr izeq[k iÙku U;kl dh njksa ds iSekus ¼,l vks

vkj½ esa fu/kkZfjr njksa ds vk/kkj ij vuqeku yxk;k tkrk gSA ih ih Vh us 12 ekg dh vof/k ds

fy, vuqekfur dh gSA ih ih Vh }kjk vuqekfur 500 oxZ eh- ds {ks= dh vko’;drk ij Hkjkslk

trk;k tkrk gSA ykblsal ’kqYd ds nj ds lanHkZ esa ih ih Vh us iÙku dh njksa ds izpfyr iSekus esa

fu/kkZfjr ykblsal ’kqYd eku pqdh gS vkSj iÙku us ykblsal ’kqYd esa o`f} dkjd ij fopkj ugha

fd;kA

o"kZ 2014 ds nkSjku izpfyr ’kqYd ij igqapus ds fy, ih ih Vh }kjk loaf/kZr dkjd ij fopkj u

djus dk dkj.k vLi"V cuk gSA vkxs ;g Hkh Li"V ugha gS fd fdl o"kZ ls ih ih Vh 12/- izfr

oxZ ehVj dh nj dks ykxw djrh gS tSlk fd ih ih Vh dk fiNyk lkekU; lalks/ku izLrko vFkkZr~

2011 o 2007 ¼tc bl izkf/kdj.k us ih ih Vh ds lkekU; la’kks/ku izLrkoksa dk fuiVkjk fd;k½

ykblsal ’kqYd dh nj 12/- izfroxZ eh- izfrfcfEcr djrs gSaA o"kZ 2007 ls igys dh fLFkfr miyC/k

ugha gSA

mijksDr fLFkfr dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, iÙku }kjk vuqekfur 12/- izfroxZ eh- izfrekg dh nj dk

fo’ys"k.k esa fcuk o`f}dkjd dks ?;ku esa j[kdj fopkj fd;k tkrk gSA pwafd miyC/k ,l vks vkj

esa 12@&izfroxZ eh- fu/kkZfjr gS lsok iznkrkvksa }kjk iÙku ds ykblsal dk Hkqxrku dsoy blh Lrj

esa gksxkA pwafd ykblsal ’kqYd fcuk fdlh czsd ds lapkyd }kjk ns; gS] tSlk fd iÙku us iqf"V dh

gS] bl fo’ys"k.k us iwjs 12 ekg dh vof/k ds fy, ykblsal ’kqYd ij fopkj fd;k tkrk gS ctk;

,p ,e lh ds 7 eghus dh fuf’Ø; vof/k ftles vkeRkkSj ij fnlacj 2009 ds ih ih Vh ,p ,Ek

lh vkns’k lfgr vU; izeq[k U;klksa ds ,p ,e lh ekeyksa dks fuiVkus esa fopkj fd;k tkrk gSA

¼viii½ ,p ,e lh dh vuqekfur iwathxr ykxr ds 16 % ij fu;ksftr iw¡th ij ykHk dh vuqefr izkIr gksA

¼ix½

bl izdkj okf"kZd jktLo vko’;drk] tks okf"kZd lapkfyr ykxr vkSj fu;ksftr iw¡th ij ykHk dh dqy

jkf’k gS] ihihVh }kjk vuqekfur 1633-91 yk[k ds jktLo vko’;drk dh rqyuk esa 1693-52 yk[k fudyrh

gSA

¼x½

ljdkj dh uhfr ds vuqlkj] rVh; dkxks± ¼ih vks ,y lfgr m"eh; dks;yk] dPpk rsy] ykSg v;Ld rFkk

ykSg v;Ld iSysV½ ds fy, fj;k;rh iz’kqYd lkekU; dkxksZ@iksr laca/kh dj dk 60% ls vf/kd ugha

fu/kkZfjr fd;k tkuk gSA bl izkf/kdj.k RkFkk ihihVh ij ljdkj }kjk rVh; dkxks± ds fy, fj;k;rh njksa ls

lacaf/kr uhfr ck/; gSA blfy, tSlk fd vks ,l ,y us fourh dh gS fons’kh dkxks± rFkk rVh; dkxks± ds

fy, ,d nj r; djuk lEHko ugha gSA fdlh Hkh ekeys es rVh; dkxkZs ij fj;k;r dh vuqefr fons’kh

dkxks± ds fy, nj dh x.kuk esa lfUufgr gSA ihihVh }kjk fn;s x;s foojk.k ls ;g ns[kk tkrk gS fd o"kZ

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY

[PART III—SEC. 4]

2010&11 ls 2013&14 ds nkSjku ,p,elh }kjk izca/k fd;s x;s fons’kh ,oa rVh; dkxks± dk vkSlr vuqikr

98-71 % 1-29 Bgjrk gSA bl fLFkfr ij fopkj fd;k tkrk gSA

¼xi½

bl izdkj dsoy Mªkb cYd dkxks± ds izca/k ds ekeys esa 2-98 fefy;u Vu] dsoy Ckszd cYd dkxks± ds

ekeys esa 1-43 fefy;u Vu o 0-89 fefy;u Vu dsoy vU; dkxks± ds izca/k ds ekeys esa vkSj

1633-91 yk[k dh okf"kZd jktLo dh t:jr ij vk/kkfjr rFkk rVh; o fons’kh dkxks± ds vuqikr ds vk/kkj

ij ,p,elh dh ekunaM {kerkk dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, Mªkb cYd dkxks± ds fy, izfrVu nj 55-18 izfr eh-

Vu] cszd cYd dkxks± ds fy, 114-97 izfr eh- Vu] vU; dkxks± ds fy, 183-95 izfr eh- Vu iÙku }kjk

izLrkfor Mªkb cYd dkxks± ds fy, 84-68 izfr eh- Vu] czsd cYd dkxks± ds fy, 176-11 izfr eh- Vu rFkk

vU; dkxks± ds fy, 281-95 izfr eh- Vu dh rqyuk esa fudyrk gSA

¼xii½

bl izkf/kdj.k }kjk vuqeksfnr rFkk ihihVh }kjk izLrkfor nj esa vUrj dk eq[; dkj.k ekunaM {kerk ij

vk/kkfjr i}fr tks fd bl izkf/kdj.k }kjk ,dN= :Ik ls nwljs izeq[k iÙku U;klksa ds leku ekeyksa ds

fuiVku esa vaxhd`r dh gS] o ihihVh }kjk mldh okLrfod@vuqekfur iz’kqYd x.kuk ij vk/kkfjr i}fr esa

vUrj ds dkj.k gSA

¼xiii½ ¼v½

;gk¡ ;g mYysf[kr djuk mfpr gksxk fd ihihVh us vius flrEcj 2014 ds la’kksf/kr izLrko esa

Mªkb cYd dkxksZ] czsd cYd dkxks± rFkk vU; dkxks± ds izgLru jsV izLrkfor djus ds vykok ,p

,e lh ds }kjk daVsuj izgLru nj 2000@& izfr daVsuj Hkh izLrkfor fd;s gSA tcfd ihihVh us

,p ,e lhs }kjk daVsuj izgLru nj ij igq¡pus dk dksbZ vk/kkj ,p ,e lh dh jktLo

vko’;drk ds fglkc ls mtkxj ugha fd;k gSA

¼c½

bl lEcU/k esa ;gk¡ ;g ;kn fnykuk izklafxd gS fd vHkh dqN fnu igys bl izkf/kdj.k us vius

vkns’k la[;k Vh,,eih@25@25013&,e vks ih Vh fnukad 04 vxLr] 2014 }kjk 100 Vu ,p

,e lh }kjk izgLru fd;s tkus okys daVsuj dk iz’kqYd fu/kkZfjr fd;k gSA 100 Vu ,p ,e lh

dh daVsuj izLru dh lkekU; {kerk ds lEcU/k es] vkns’k ds dkj.k mYysf[kr gSA izgLru nj 20

Qsjs izfr ?kaVk izfr ,p ,e lh eku fy;k x;k gSA vHkh ds ekeys esa blh rjg 20 Qsjs dh izgLru

nj ekudj] ,p ,e lh dh lkekU; {kerk 80000 daVsuj] ;fn dsoy daVsuj izgLru gks, fudkyh

x;h gSA vkxs 1633-91 yk[k jktLo dh vko’;drk dks /;ku esa j[krs gq,] tSlk fd fiNys

iSjkxzkQ esa fopkj foe’kZ gks pqdk gS] ,p ,e lh ds }kjk daVsuj izgLru dh nj 2042@&

fudyrh gSA

blhfy, bldks bl le:Ik esa ugha viuk;k tk ldrk D;ksafd bldk dkj.k ;g gS fd daVsuj

cgqr izdkj ds fofHkUu Js.kh rFkk vkdkj esa gksrs gSa tSls Hkjk gqvk@[kkyh] 20^@40^ vkSj 40^ ls

Åij Vh bZ ;w esa izgLrfjr] [krjs okys] cMas+ vkdkj okys tks jktLo dh vko’;drk ij vlj

MkysaxsA mnkgj.k ds fy, 40^ ds ,d daVsuj dk izgLru iz’kqYd] 20^ okys dk 1-5 xquk] 40^ ls

cMs+ dk 20^ okys dk 2 xquk] [krjs okys daVsuj dk iz’kqYd lkekU; daVsuj ls 1-25 xquk gksxkA

bl rjg ds fo’ys"k.k dh vuqifLFkfr esa ihihVh ij] ,p,elh }kjk izgLru nj dks fuf’pr djuk

lEHko ugha gSA vkxs] dhs tSlk igys Hkh dgk tk pqdk gS fd ,p ,e lh }kjk daVsuj izgLru dh

nj iRru }kjk vius flrEcj] 2014 ds izLrko esa 2000 izfr daVsuj izLrkfor dh tk pqdh gSA

blds ifj.kke Lo:Ik iz;ksxdrkZ@lsok iznkrk bl rjg ds izLrko ls vufHkK gSaA

laiw.kZ fLFkfr ds ifjis{; esa ihihVh dks lq>ko fn;k tkrk gS fd og ,d vPNh rjg ls fo’ys"k.k

fd;k gqvk izLrko nk;j djs] ;fn og ,slk pkgrk gS fd ,p ,e lh }kjk fofHkUu izdkj ds

daVsujksa dh izgLru nj ij ig¡qpk tk; ¼80000 daVsujksa dh lkekU; {kerk ds vUnj½ tks jktLo

{kerk 1633-91 yk[k] tks fd igys ls gh vkdfyr dh tk pqdh gS ij vk/kkfjr gksA

¼l½

dk;Zokgh ds nkSjku] bl ekeys ds lEcU/k esa tks fd ihihVh us vk/kkj nj ds izLrko esa lanfHkZr

fd;k gS fd dqN iz;ksx drkZvksa@lsok iznkrkvksa us crk;k gS fd ,p ,e lh izpkyd ihihVh ij

orZeku esa 1000 #Ik;s izfr daVsuj izgLr iz’kqYd olwy jgs gSaA bl izkf/kdj.k us] ihihVh ij] ,p

,e lh }kjk daVsuj izgLru dh dksbZ nj vHkh rd fu/kkZfjr ugha dh gSA mi;qZDr olwyh dk

vk/kkj vKkr gSA blfy, ihihVh dks lq>ko fn;k tkrk gS fd ,slh iz’kqYd olwyh ls nwj jgs rFkk

fdlh lsok iznkrk dks Hkh fdlh olwyh dh vkKk u ns tks bl izkf/kdj.k }kjk Lohd`r u dh xbZ

gksA

¼n½

,slh dksbZ ?kks"k.kk u rks bl izkf/kdj.k rFkk u gh ihihVh }kjk la;qDr lquokbZ esa dh x;h Fkh fd

,p ,e lh dk iz’kqYd 1000@& izfr daVsuj izfr Qsjk ihihVh ij gksxk tSlk fd ,l ,l ,y

,y us fd;k gSA tc ihihVh ls bl fo"k; esa fo’ks"k fVIi.kh ekaxh x;h rc ihihVh us Hkh fdlh

,slh ?kks"k.kk dks fuf’pr ugha fd;k gS ysfdu lkekU;r;k dg fn;k gS fd blus izLrkfor daVsuj

izgLru nj dks flrEcj] 2014 ds la’kksf/kr izLrko es izLrkfor fd;k gSA

¼xiv½

Åij dh fLFkfr ds vuqlkj ihihVh }kjk fn;s x;s dher fooj.k esa lq/kkj fd;k x;k gSA lq/kkj fd;k x;k

dher fooj.k layXud ds :Ik esa layXu gSA

¼xv½

¼v½

ekxZ n’khZ 2005 dh /kkjk 5-9 iz’kqYd dks mRikndrk ds oasp ekdZ Lrj esa tksM+us ds fy, dgrh gS

tc vPNs iznz’kZu ds fy, iqjLdkj rFkk osap ekdZ Lrj ls de izn’kZu ds fy, n.M dh O;oLFkk

¹Hkkx IIIµ[k.M 4º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vlk/kj.k

gksA blh rjg izn’kZu ls tqM+k iz’kqYd dsoy ihihVh dks gh ugha cfYd vU; eq[; iRru U;klksa dks

Hkh tgkWa lsok iznkrkvksa }kjk ,p ,e lh yxk;kh xbZ gS ds fy, Hkh fuf’pr fd;k x;k gS dkxks±

iz’kqYd fuf’pr fd;k x;k tSls Mªkb cYd dkxksZ] czsd cYd dkxks± rFkk vU; dkxks± rFkk ;g

Øe’k% 12500 Vu izfrfnu] 6000 Vu izfrfnu rFkk 3750 Vu izfrfnu fd vk/kkj izn’kZu dks

ekudj fd;k x;k gSA izgLru {kerk dks Hkh lkekU; {kerk dk vk/kkj ekuk x;k gSA

¼c½

viuh vk/kkj iz’kqYd nj tks flrEcj 2014 ds la’kksf/kr izLrko ds lkFk j[kh x;h Fkh ihihVh us

izn’kZu ls tqM+k iz’kqYd izLrkfor fd;k gS ftldk vk/kkj izn’kZu Lrj 7001&9000 Vu izfrfnu

Mªkb cYd dkxks± ds fy, 3501&5500 Vu izfrfnu] czsd cYd dkxks± ds fy, 2001&4000 Vu

izfrfnu vU; dkxks± gsrq gSA vk/kkj Lrj ls Åij fdlh Hkh c<ksrjh gsrq ihihVh us] vk/kkj iz’kqYd

esa ¶ysV 5% dh c<ksrjh dk izLrko j[kk gS rFkk vk/kkj Lrj ls uhps ds fy, ihihVh us] vk/kkj

iz’kqYd esa 5% deh dk izLrko j[kk gSA vk/kkj izn’kZu Lrj tks ihihVh }kjk izLrkfor fd;k x;k

gS fdlh fo’ys’k.k ds lkFk ugha gSA

¼l½

tSls fd igys ppkZ dh tk pqdh gS] dk;ZQyu ekun.M 12500 Mªkb cYd dkxks± gsrq 6000 Vu

izfrfnu] czsd cYd dkxks± gsrq vkSj 3750 Vu izfrfnu vU; dkxks± gsrq gS] vk/kkj nj ij igqWpus

ds fy, x.kuk esa fy, x;s gSA blfy, dV vkWQ fcUnq dks Hkh lkekU; Lrj izgLru] lHkh izdkj

ds dkxks± ls tksM+us ds fy, vuqjks/k fd;k tkrk gSA tSlk fd Åij dgk x;k gSA

¼n½

vPNs izn’kZu gsrq iqjLdkj ds fooj.k ds lEcU/k esa ihihVh dk 5% dh c<ksrjh dk izLrko tks

orZeku ifjis{; Hkh izpfyr gS dks ekuk tkrk gSA tcfd vk/kkj Lrj ls uhps ds izn’kZu ds fy,

n.M Lo:Ik tks izLrko gS] ,p ,e lh izpkyd dks bl fLFkfr esa igqWpk tk ldrk gS fd og

vko’;d vuqekfur okf"kZd jktLo Hkh iwjk u dj ldsA bl izdkj izpkyd gkfudkjd voLFkk esa

igqWp tk;sxkA blfy, ;g lgh ekuk x;k gS fd vk/kkj Lrj ls uhps ds izn’kZu dks fy, fcuk]

,p ,e lh izpkyd bl voLFkk esa gksuk pkfg, fd og fo’ks"k dkxks± dSVsfxjh esa de ls de

vk/kkj iz’kqYd izkIr dj ldsA fLFkfr ds vuqlkj] izn’kZu Lrj ds ?kVus ij vk/kkj Lrj ls uhps

dh] dksbZ ?kVh iz’kqYd nj ugha ekuh tkrh gSA

¼xvi½

ihihVh }kjk izLrkfor lkekU; fVIif.k;ka tks mu ekeyksa ds lkeUtL; es gS tks eq[; iRru U;klksa ds fy,

vuqeksfnr gS, dk vuqeksnu fd;k tkrk gSA

¼xvii½ ihihVh dk izLrko tks izLrkfor nj dks gksy lsy izkbl baMsDl ¼MCyw ih vkbZ½ dh 60% ek=k ds lkFk

lwfpc} djus gsrq gS] bl lwphdj.k dks mPpre 3% rd j[kuk ekxZ nf’kZdk 2008 ds vuqlkj gSA tSls fd

,p,elh ds iz’kqYd fu/kkZj.k dk izLrko ekxZ nf’kZdk 2005 ds vuqlkj izLrkfor fd;k x;k gS blfy, bl

izLrko dks vuqeksfnr djuk laHko ugha Ikk;k x;k gSA

12-1

ifj.kkeLo:i] Åij fn;s x;s dkj.kksa vkSj lEiw.kZrk ds lkFk oqf} ds iz;ksx ds vk/kkj ij ;g izkf/kdj.k izLrkoksa dk

tks vHkh izpyu es gS rFkk lsD’ku 2-5¼c½ izpkfyr vk/kkj nj ihihVh ds v/;k; II dkxks± lEcfU/kr iz’kqYd es gS dks] fuEu

vuqlkj cnyus dk vuqeksnu djrh gSA

2-15

¼c½

O;fDrxr izpkydksa }kjk LFkkfir dh x;h 100 Vu gkcZj eksckbYk Øsu ds iz;ksx ds iz’kqYdA

¼i½

MªkbZ cYd dkxksZ

uksV%& o`f)dkjh mPpre njsa ifjxf.kr djus ds fy, tSlk fd Åij fn[kk;k x;k gS fd igys

1000 Vu ds fy, vk/kkj nj dks c<kdj 105% fd;k x;k gS RkFkk nwljs 1000 Vu ds fy, vk/kkj

nj dk 110 % c<k;k x;k gSA blh izdkj 14500 Vu ls vkxs nj fudkyus ds fy, ogh fof/k

viukbZ tk;A

¼ii½

czsd cYd dkxks± ds fy,

Izfrfnu Øsu ds izn’kZu dk

vkSlr ¼ehfVªd Vu es½

mPpre lhek

fons kh

rVorhZ

12500

55-18

33-11

12501&13500

57-94

34-77

13501&14500

60-70

36-42

vkSlr nSfud Øsu

fu’iknurk ¼eh-Vu esa½

mPpre nj izfr Vu ¼:Ik;s esa½

fons’kh

rVh;

6000

114-97

68-98

6001&7000

120-72

72-43

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY

[PART III—SEC. 4]

uksV%

o`f} dkjh mPp njsa ifjxf.kr djus gsrq] tSlk fd mij fn[kk;k x;k gS] igys 1000 Vu

ds fy, vk/kkj nj dks c<kdj 105% fd;k x;k gS] 7000 Vu ls vkxs ds fy, nj

ifjxf.kr djus ds fy, Hkh ;gh fof/k viukbZ tk;sxhA

¼iii½

vU; dkxks± ds fy,

uksV%

o`f} dkjh mPp njsa ifjxf.kr djus gsrq] tSlk fd mij fn[kk;k x;k gS] igys 1000 Vu

ds fy, vk/kkj nj dks c<kdj 105 % fd;k x;k gS] 4750 Vu ls vkxs ds fy, nj

ifjxf.kr djus ds fy, Hkh ;gh fof/k viukbZ tk;sxhA

uksV~l %

¼i½

izfrfnu dh iksr?kkV vkSlr fu’iknurk dh x.kuk djus dk lw= fuEukuqlkj gS%

,p ,e lh }kjk yknh xbZ@mrkjh xbZ dqy ek=k

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&X 24 ?kaVs

iksr izpkyu ds vkjaHk ls iw.kZrk rd fy;k x;k dqy le;

¼ii½

iksr esa@ls dkxks± ds ynku@mrjkbZ ds vkjaHk ls mldh iw.kZrk rd izfrfnu dh iksr?kkV vkSlr

fu’iknurk ds vuqlkj Øsu fdjk;k izHkkj dh leqfpr nj ykns@mrkjs x, dkxks± dh laiw.kZ ek=k ds fy,

iÙku mi;ksx drkZvksa ls olwyh ds fy, pquh tk;sxhA

¼iii½

;fn ,d ,p ,e lh fdlh nwljh ,p ,e lh ;k bZ ,y ,y Øsu@ Øsuksa ds lkFk dke djrh gS rks Øsu

dh izfrfnu iksr?kkV fu"iknurk ,p ,e lh yksMehVj }kjk fjdkMZ dh xbZ ek=k ds vk/kkj ij lqfuf’pr

dh tk;xhA

¼iv½

;fn Øsu esa ,d ?kaVs ls vf/kd dh [kjkch vk tk,]tc rd iksr iksr?kkV ls jokuk gks] ,p ,e lh }kjk

izgfLrr ek=k dk fu/kkZj.k Øsu esa [kjkch vkus ls igys yksM x;s@mrkjs x, dkxks± dh ek=k dks fglkc esa

ysdj mls Øsu ds dke ds ?kaVksa ls foHkkftr fd;k tk, vkSj ,sls HkkxQy dks 24 ls xq.kk djds fd;k

tk,A

¼v½

;fn ,p ,e lh ds izpkyu esa yxkrkj nks ?kaVs ls vf/kd le; rd :dkoV vk tk, ftlds fy, ,p ,e

lh dks ftEesnkj u Bgjk;k tk lds] rks iksr esa Øsu ds izpkyu ds dqy le; dh x.kuk djrs le; Øsu

dks leqfpr NwV iznku dh tk,xh] nks ?kaVs ls de le; ds fy, ,p ,e lh ds izpkyu Eks vkbZ :dkoV

ij mi;ZqDr iz;kstu ds fy, fopkj ugha fd;k tk,xk] ,slh :dkoV ftlds fy, ,p ,e lh mRrjnk;h gS

dksbZ NwV ugha nh tk,xhA ,p ,e lh ds dke djus ds nkSjku ynku@mrjkbZ izpkyuksa esa lHkh :dkoVksa

dks iksr ds LVhoMksj }kjk nSfud iksr fu"iknurk fjiksVZ esa izekf.kr fd, tkus dh vko’;drk gSA

¼vi½

,p ,e lh esa [kjkch ds dkj.k ;k dke u djus ds dkj.k ;fn iksr dks LFkkukarfjr djuk vko’;d gks

tkrk gS rks #- 1]00]000 ¼,d yk[k :Ik;s ek=½ ds v/kZnaM ds lkFk&lkFk] iksr ?kkV ls yaxjxkg rd iksr

dks LFkkaukarfjr djus ds izHkkj Øsu&izpkyd ls olwys tk,xsa] bl izdkj olwys x;s LFkkukarj.k izHkkj iksr ds

,tsUV dks okil fd, tk,xs tcfd vFkZnaM dh jkf’k iÙku }kjk vius ikl j[kh tk,xhA

¼vii½

vkSlr fu"iknurk ij fookn ds ekeys esa] iÙku U;kl dk fu.kZ; vfUre vkSj ck/;dkjh gksxkA”

12-2

vuqeksfnr nj Hkkjr ds jkti= esa bl vkns’k dh vf/klwpuk dh frfFk ds ckn 30 fnu chr tkus ij izHkkoh gksxh vkSj

rhu o"kZ rd izHkkoh jgsxh] bl izkf/kdj.k }kjk fof’k"V :Ik ls foLRkkj u fd, tkus dh n’kk esa fn;k x;k vuqeksnu Lopfyr

:Ik ls [kRe gks tk,xkA

13-3

iz’kqYd ekxZnf’kZ;ksa dh /kkjk 7-2 ds vuqlkj] bl izkf/kdj.k }kjk gkcZj eksckby Øsuksa ds fy, vuqeksfnr nj mPpre

nj gS vkSj iÙku ij leku lqfo/kk,sa@lsok,sa iznku djus ds fy,] fdlh fo’ks iznkrk dk mYys[k fd, fcuk] leku :Ik ls ykxw

gksxhA iz’kqYd ekxZnf’kZ;ksa dh /kkjk 7-2 ds vuqlkj] iÙku izkf/kdkj O;oLFkk esa mi;qDr :Ik ls ,d vko’;d “krZ Mkydj ;g

lqfuf’pr djs fd izkf/kd`r lsok iznkrk fu/kkZfjr mPpre nj ls vf/kd olwy u djsA

Vh- ,l- ckyklqczã.;u] lnL; ¼foÙk½

[foKkiu&III@4@vlk-@143@2014]

vkSlr nSfud Øsu

fu’iknurk ¼eh-Vu esa½

mPpre nj izfr Vu¼:Ik;s esa½

fons’kh

rVh;

3750

183-95

110-37

3751&4750

193-14

115-89

¹Hkkx IIIµ[k.M 4º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vlk/kj.k

lalalalayXud

yXud

पारादीप

पारादीप पन

पन

पन यास

यास

यास पर

पर

पर मोबइल

मोबइल

मोबइल हाब र

हाब र

हाब र ेन

ेन

ेन ारा

ारा

ारा ित

ित

ित टन

टन

टन हतन

हतन

हतन दर

दर

दर पर

पर

पर पँचने

पँचने

पँचने केकेकेके िलए

िलए

िलए संगणना

संगणना

संगणना प

प

(लाख

लाख

लाख टन

टन

टन मममम) ) ) )

.स.

िववरण

पी

पी पी

पी

पी टी

टी

टी केकेकेके 29.9.2014

29.9.2014

29.9.2014 केकेकेके संशोिधत

संशोिधत

संशोिधत ताव

ताव

मममम रखा

रखा

रखा गया

गया

गया अनुमान

अनुमान

टी

टी ए एम

एम

एम पी

पी

पी ारा

ारा

ारा मोडरेट

मोडरेट

मोडरेट कया

कया

कया गया

गया

अनुमान

अिधकतम

अिधकतम मता

मता

ाई बक

काग

ेक बक

काग

अय

काग

(i)

काग भाग

100%

(ii)

काग हतन दर टन म ित दन

12500

6000

3750

(iii)

काग हतन दर टन म ित घंटा

744

357

223

(iv)

एक वष म कुल काय दवस

4000

(v)

िबचाराथ एच एम सी क सं!या

(vi)

"ि#गत काग $मता (i*ii*iv*v)

2976190

1428571

892857

(vii)

वाषक

वाषक हतन

हतन

हतन मता

मता

मता (लाख

लाख

लाख टन

टन

टन मममम)

29.76

14.29

8.93

(viii)

वाषक

वाषक हतन

हतन

हतन मता

मता

मता (िमिलयन

िमिलयन

िमिलयन टन

टन

टन मममम)

2.00

2.98

1.43

0.89

IIIIIIII

पूँजी

पूँजी लागत

लागत

(i)

2 %ेव के साथ 100 टन मोबाइल हाबर &ेन क

कमत

पी पी टी - (€ 3430000+ € 270000)*

Rs 80

टी ए एम पी-(€ 3430000+ € 270000)*

Rs 77.09

2,960.00

2,852.33

(ii)

अित'र# 2 %ेव क कमत

200.00

(iii)

सीमा शुक एच ए0 सी क कमत के 25 क

दर से

740.00

713.08

(iv)

अय पूँजी कमत (पी पी टी- 200 लाख *पये)

(टी ए एम पी- पूँजी कमत का 5)

200.00

188.27

योग

योग II (i+ii)

II (i+ii)

4,100.00

3,953.68

III

चालन

चालन लागत

लागत

लागत ित

ित

ित वष

वष

(i)

ईधन लागत :

(पी पी टी-0.08 लीटर ित टन, रेट ित लीटर

72.20 लाख टन) (टी ए एम पी- 70 लीटर ित

घंटा, दर 60.83 ित लीटर 4000 घंटे)

115.20

170.32

(ii)

रख रखाव और मर,मत

(पी पी टी - उपकरण क कमत के 5 क दर से )

(टी ए एम पी- उपकरण क कमत के 5 क दर से

)

195.00

197.68

(iii)

बीमा (पूँजी कमत का 1%)

39.00

39.54

(iv)

अवमूयन(पीपीटी- 18.10 % पूँजी कमत के

ड/लू डी बी का) (टी ए एम पी- पूँजी कमत का

10 %)

492.60

395.37

(v).

लाइसस शुक

(पी पी टी और टी ए एम पी-12 *पये ित वग

मीटर ित महीना, 500 वग मीटर, 12 महीने)

0.72

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY

[PART III—SEC. 4]

(vi)

अय खच3 पूँजी कमत का 5 %

195.00

197.68

कुल

कुल चालन

चालन

चालन क मत

क मत

क मत ( i i i i सेसेसेसे vivivivi का

का

का योग

योग

योग)

1,037.52

1,001.3

1,001.32

िनवेिशत

िनवेिशत पूँजी

पूँजी

पूँजी पर

पर

पर आय

आय

आय 16 %

16 %

16 % क

क

क दर

दर

दर सेसेसेसे

656.00

632.59

अनुमािनत

अनुमािनत वाषक

वाषक

वाषक राजव

राजव

राजव क

क

क आव#कता

आव#कता

आव#कता:

(अ). कुल चालन कमत

1,037.52

1,001.32

(व). िनवेिशत पूँजी पर आय

656.00

632.59

(स). कुल राजव क आव6कता

1,693.52

1,633.91

633.91

क मत

क मत ित

ित

ित मी

मी

मी. . . . टन

टन

ाई बक

काग

ेक

बक

काग

अय

काग

duVsuj

ाई बक

काग

ेक बक

काग

अय

काग

(अ).

). कुल

कुल

कुल वाषक

वाषक

वाषक आव#कता

आव#कता

आव#कता (लाख

लाख

लाख मममम)

1,693.52

1,633.91

(व).

). मता

मता

2000000

297619

2976190

1428571

892857

(स).

). क मत

क मत

क मत ित

ित

ित मी

मी

मी. . . . टन

टन

(i) िवदेशी

84.68

176.1

281.9

2000.0

55.18

114.97

183.95

(ii) तटवत8

33.11

68.98

110.37

TARIFF AUTHORITY FOR MAJOR PORTS

NOTIFICATION

Mumbai, the 24th December, 2014

No. TAMP/30/2014-PPT.— In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 48 of the Major Port Trusts Act,

1963 (38 of 1963), the Tariff Authority for Major Ports hereby disposes of the proposal received from the Paradip Port

Trust (PPT) for fixation of ceiling tariff for the Harbour Mobile Crane (HMC), to be applied commonly at the PPT

without reference to any particular service provider, as in the Order appended hereto.

TARIFF AUTHORITY FOR MAJOR PORTS

Case No. TAMP/30/2014-PPT

Paradip Port Trust

- - -

Applicant

QUORUM:

(i)

Shri. T. S. Balasubramanian, Member (Finance)

(ii)

Shri. C. B. Singh, Member (Economic)

ORDER

(Passed on this 28th day of November 2014)

This case deals with the proposal received from Paradip Port Trust (PPT) for fixation of ceiling tariff for the

Harbour Mobile Crane (HMC), to be applied commonly at the PPT without reference to any particular service provider.

It may be recalled that this Authority vide its Order dated 30 December 2009 had disposed of the proposal

received from PPT fixing tariff for the use of Harbour Mobile Crane (HMC) installed at PPT. This Order was notified in

the Gazette of India on 12 January 2010 vide Gazette No. 21. The tariff for the use of HMC at PPT so fixed in December

2009 was a ceiling rate to be applied commonly at the PPT without reference to any particular service provider, as

stipulated in Clause 7.2 of the tariff guidelines of 2005, and was valid for a period of three years after expiry of 15 days

from the date of notification of the Order in the Gazette of India.

3.1.

In June 2014, the PPT had submitted two different proposals for fixation of tariff for HMC of 100 tonne

capacity. Given that the validity of the common tariff for the use of the HMC at PPT has expired on 26 January 2013,

the 1st proposal submitted by the PPT was for fixing the tariff for the HMC beyond January 2013. It had submitted the

2nd proposal for fixation of tariff for the said additional HMC on the ground that the PPT is going to invite tender for

engagement of additional HMC.

3.2.

In this connection, it was immediately communicated to PPT vide our letter dated 20 June 2014 that the two

proposals dated 6/7 June 2014 and 7 June 2014 filed by PPT seeking two different set of rates for the same capacity of

HMC viz. 100T HMC is not seen to be in line with clause 7.2. of the tariff guidelines of 2005. The PPT was, therefore,

¹Hkkx IIIµ[k.M 4º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vlk/kj.k

requested to recast its proposal and file a single revised proposal with governing conditions, proposing to fix one

common tariff for the use of HMC to be applied commonly at the PPT without reference to any particular service

provider duly clarifying the authorisation arrangement envisaged for the additional HMC.

3.3.

Further, since the PPT had proposed higher rate for a new crane apparently stemming from the intention that a

new crane with a higher productivity should fetch a better rate for the service provider, the PPT was requested to

propose performance linked tariff, thereby providing incentives for better performance and disincentive for performance

below the benchmark level. It was also brought to the notice of PPT that the performance linked tariff structure will also,

inter alia, suit the situation, when cranes of capacity different from the normative level of 100 tonnes are placed in

operation.

4.1.

In this backdrop, the PPT vide its letter dated 17 July, 2014 has submitted its proposal for fixation of tariff for

the use of Harbor Mobile Crane (HMC). The main submissions made by the PPT in its proposal are summarized below:

(i)

The calculations have been made considering the annual capacity of one HMC as 2 Million Metric

Tonne. This has been arrived considering the average actual cargo handled by one HMC during the

period from 2007-08 to 2013-14.

(ii)

The cost of the Harbour Mobile Crane has been taken as per the budgetary offer received from the

manufacturer which is 34.30 lakh Euro and 2.70 lakh Euro has been considered towards cost of

transportation. The customs duty has been considered at 25%. The all-inclusive cost of the HMC in

Indian Rupees works out to ` 3700 lakhs. Considering the upfront premium, interest and working

capital margin to the tune of ` 950 lakhs, the cost of the HMC has been considered at ` 4650 lakhs.

(iii)

The operating expenditure under different heads have been taken as per the norms fixed by the TAMP

even though the actual expenditure on these heads are more, as the spares are to be procured from

abroad and payments are to be made in foreign currencies. Processing a high rate for HMC may lead

to increase in the overall cost of handling of cargo in PPT which may discourage the customers and

result in diversion of cargo to nearby ports.

(iv)

The installation of Harbour Mobile Crane is badly necessary in Paradip Port for early evacuation of

cargo so that the productivity and overall profitability will increase. PPT is not very keen to earn

revenue by granting license to the operators, rather it is keen to handle more cargo which will enhance

the performance of PPT with deployment of HMCs.

(v)

During the joint hearing on 27.06.2014 at Bhubaneswar (relating to some HMC High Court matter),

the operators were insisting to have an escalation provision since the operating expenditure includes

fuel and labour costs which are increasing every year at average high rate. In view of this, it is

proposed to escalate the rate at 60% of the price index as applicable to PPP projects subject to a

maximum limit of 3%. Considering the above, the revised rate per tonne stands at ` 82.45 for Foreign

Cargo and `49.47 for coastal cargo.

4.2.

The cost statement furnished by the PPT to arrive at per tonne rate of HMC is as under:—

Sr.

No.

Particulars

Basis

Workings

` in Lakhs

Cost

100T

Mobile

Harbour Cranes (` Lakhs)

(WDV) (` 2963.70 lakh

original

3700.00

Other Expenses (all other

facilities

required

for

operation of machine and

includes upfront premium

interest

working

capital

margin)

Statement of

other

expenses

` in

Lakh

1 Sundry Debtors

(2 months)

150.00

Upfront

Premium

750.00

Spares

50.00

Total

950.00

950.00

Total Capital Cost

4650.00

Annual

capacity

(in

2.00

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY

[PART III—SEC. 4]

Million Tonnes)

III

Operating Cost

(a)

Fuel cost

(As per actuals)

0.08 ltrs per

tonne Rate per

Ltr. ` 72/-

115.20

(b)

Repairs & Maintenance cost

@ 5% of Equipment cost

(As per TAMP)

5% on cost of mechanical

equipment

5%*

` 3700 lakhs

185.00

(c)

Insurance (As per TAMP)

1% on cost of mechanical

equipment

1%* `3700 lakhs

37.00

(d)

Depreciation

(As

per

TAMP)

As per norms prescribed in

Companies Act

10.34%*

`3700 lakhs

382.58

(e)

License Fee

As per scale of rates

`1200 per

month*12 months

0.14

(f)

Other Expenses @ 5% of I

(As per TAMP)

5% of gross fixed asset value

5%* `700 lakhs

185.00

Total=SL No. (a) to (f)

904.92

ROCE@16%

i.e.,

after

adjustment of depreciation

16% on Capital employed

16%*

`4650 lakhs

744.00

Total cost plus Return on

Investment

III + IV

1648.92

Hire charges per shift

VII

Hire

charges

per

tonne

(Foreign)

`1648.92 lakhs/

2 million tonnes

82.45

VIII

Hire

charges

per

tonne

(Coastal)

60%*

` 82.45

49.47

4.3.

It was seen from the PPT proposal dated 17 July 2014 in reference that the PPT did not furnish the draft Scale

of Rates. Since Clause 3.2.4 of the 2005 Guidelines requires circulation of the proposed tariff to the users, the PPT was

requested vide our letter dated 23 July, 2014 to furnish the proposed draft Scale of Rates along with conditions

governing the application of rates.

4.4.

Further, since, the PPT has not furnished the names of the prospective service providers, who may have to be

consulted on the case in reference, the PPT was also requested vide the above referred letter to furnish the names of the

prospective service providers along with their contact details.

4.5.

In this backdrop, the PPT undercover of its letter dated 2 August, 2014 has furnished the contact details of the

service providers of HMC at PPT as well as the draft scale of rates as given below:

Note:

The above Scale of Rate is applicable for all the type of cargo. The container handling will be

as per the existing rate.

In accordance with the consultative process prescribed, a copy each of the proposal dated 17 July 2014 and 2

August, 2014 received from the PPT was circulated to the concerned users/user organisations and Service Providers

seeking their comments. The comments received from the users/user organisations and Service Providers were

forwarded to the PPT as feedback information. The PPT has responded to the comments of the users/user organisations

vide its e-mail dated 30 September, 2014 and letter dated 20 October, 2014.

Based on a preliminary scrutiny of the proposal, the PPT was requested vide our letter dated 11 September,

2014 to furnish information/clarification on some issues. The PPT has responded vide its letter dated 30 September,

2014. While responding to the queries, the PPT has furnished a revised proposal. The queries raised by us and the

response of PPT thereon are tabulated below:

Sl. No.

Queries raised by us

Response by PPT

The PPT to confirm that the proposal under

reference is for fixing the common ceiling rate for

the use of HMC at the PPT, without reference to

The Proposal made vide letter no EM/WS/TECH-

04/2014(485) dated 17th July, 2014 is for fixing a

common ceiling rate for the use of HMC at PPT.

Sl.

No.

Cargo handled per day

Rate in ` per tonne

Foreign

Coastal

Below 6000

65.96

39.58

6001-7000

74.21

44.53

Above 7000

82.45

49.47

¹Hkkx IIIµ[k.M 4º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vlk/kj.k

any particular service provider, as stipulated in

clause 7.2 of the tariff guidelines of 2005.

(a). To arrive at the proposed hire charge of

` 82.45 per MT, the PPT is seen to have

considered the average of the actual cargo handled

by 1 No. of HMC during the period from 2007-08

to 2013-14, as base. The deviation from normative

capacity based tariff to actual traffic based tariff

needs justification.

The deviation from normative capacity based tariff was

based on the discussion held with port users from time

to time. Further, the rate fixed in 2009 is no more

attractive for the operator for which PPT has not got any

response during last tender even thougha it was

extended 3 times.

(b). In terms of clause 7.2 of the ‘Tariff Guidelines,

2005’ and following the approach adopted by this

Authority in fixation of common ceiling tariff

under Clause 7.2 of the tariff guidelines of 2005

for operation of Harbour Mobile Crane (HMC) by

private operators at some of the major port trusts

like New Mangalore Port Trust (NMPT), V.O.

Chidambaranar

Port

Trust

(VOCPT)

and

Visakhapatnam Port Trust (VPT) and in the case of

CFS–Buffer yard facility at Jawaharlal Nehru Port

Trust (JNPT), the PPT is requested to review its

proposal based on the normative capacity of the

HMC, instead of considering the past actual traffic

handled by the different service providers. In this

connection, it is noteworthy that even during the

fixation of hire charges for HMC at PPT in

December 2009, the hire charge was fixed based

on the normative capacity of the HMC as then

proposed by PPT. The same approach to be

adopted to determine the normative capacity of the

HMC.

The fresh proposal has been prepared based on the

outcome of the joint hearing held on 22.09.2014. The

revised proposal is furnished.

The PPT has given only the details of the operator

wise and yearwise cargo handled througha HMC

during the years 2007-08 to 2013-14. In this

connection, the PPT to furnish the average per day

handling rate achieved by each of the operators at

70% utilization (24 hrs * 70%=16.80 hrs) for three

broad categories of cargo viz. dry bulk, break bulk

and other cargo separately for each of the year

during the period 2007-08 to 2013-14.

The average year wise berth day handling rate achieved

by each operators at 70% utilization for three broad

categories of Cargo viz. Dry bulk, Break bulk and other

are as follows:

(A) DRY BULK CARGO

Sl.

No.

Year

Average Handling rate per day by operators

at 70% utilisation in Tonne /Day

JSPL CREW-1 Crew-2 Osl-1

OSL-2

1. 2009-10

8942

6174

2. 2010-11

11554

8688

3. 2011-12

13232

11827

4. 2012-13

B/D

9768

8076

9366

7088

5. 2013-14

10102

9539

8088

10793

8914

(B) BREAK BULK CARGO

Sl.

No.

Year

wise

Average Handling rate per day by operators

at 70% utilisation in Tonne/Day

JSPL CREW-1 Crew-2 OSL-1 OSL-2

2009-10

498

2010-11

779

2011-12

673

2012-13

609

2013-14

428

506

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY

[PART III—SEC. 4]

(C) OTHER CARGO

Sl.

No.

Year

wise

Average Handling rate per day by operators

at 70 % utilisation in Tonne/Day

JSPL CREW-1 CREW-2OSL-1 OSL-2

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

596

664

2012-13

Nil

756

2013-14

526

508

However, PPT is proposing to have one HMC in each

berth with an additional HMC as standby for which the

cargo availability for individual HMC will be affected.

(a) Apart from the capital cost of one HMC at `37

crores, the PPT has added the cost towards sundry

debtors, upfront premium and spares aggregating

to `9.50 crores to the capital cost of HMC. In this

connection, it is relevant here to mention that apart

from the cost of the equipment (incurred upto its

installation), no other cost is factored into the

capital cost of equipment. Such an approach has

been uniformly followed while determining the

normative hire charge of HMC at various major

port trusts as listed above including in the case of

PPT (fixation of hire charge for HMC in 2009).

The revised proposal has been made based on the

outcome of the joint hearing held on 22.09.2014.

(b) Without prejudice to the above, the PPT to

furnish/clarify/justify the following:

(i)

The proposal of PPT is to fix tariff for

HMC based on certain norms. No norms have been

prescribed under 2005 tariff guidelines. If a

reference is drawn to the norms prescribed for

multipurpose cargo berth under 2008 upfront tariff

setting Guidelines, Miscellaneous cost under

capital cost to the tune of 5% of equipment cost is

considered to cover other cost including working

capital margin.

The PPT has also considered other

expenses at 5% of the Gross value of the

equipment. That being so, consideration of sundry

debtors and spares separately is seen to be double

counting. Therefore, the PPT to clarify the position

bringing out the basis for 2 months considered for

sundry debtors at `150 lakhs and spares at `50

Lakhs supported with working.

The revised proposal has been made based on the

outcome of the joint hearing held on 22.09.2014.

[However, the PPT has not ignored the Sundry Debtors

component and cost of spares component from the

capital cost of the crane as seen from the revised

proposal].

(ii)

When a common tariff is required to be

fixed without reference to individual service

provider, the PPT to clarify whether consideration

of `750 Lakhs being the one time upfront premium

apparently quoted by one service provider fits into

the frame work of clause 7.2.

`750 lakhs had been obtained during last tendering. But,

the same has been ignored in the revised proposal as per

the directive of ministry.

While determining the hire charge of HMC at

various major port trusts as listed above including

in the case of PPT (fixation of hire charge for

HMC in 2009), the fuel cost has been considered

based on the fuel consumption of 70 litres per hour

for 4000 hours per annum. In this connection, the

PPT is requested to justify the basis of

consumption of 0.08 litres per tonne.

The consumption of 0.08 litres per Tonne has been

calculated from the consumption of 70 Liters per hour

taking the filling factor of 0.9, cargo density 0.8 and

cycle of 32 per hour with grab capacity of 37 CBM. The

consumption rate is reasonable and it is less as

comparison to Kandla.

The Orissa Stevedores Ltd (OSL) has stated in

their comments, a copy of which has been

forwarded to PPT that the depreciation has to be at

The

observation

Orissa

Stevedores

Ltd

depreciation has been taken into consideration while

calculating the revised tariff by PPT.

¹Hkkx IIIµ[k.M 4º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vlk/kj.k

18.10% as per Companies Act, 2013. The PPT to

examine the suggestion of OSL and rework the

cost of depreciation based on the provisions of the

Companies Act, 2013.

(a)

The PPT to confirm that the rate of

licence fee considered by it in its calculation, is as

per the prevailing Scale of Rates of PPT after

applying escalation factor at the appropriate rate.

The PPT to also indicate the reference of the

Licence Fees in its Scale of Rates.

The License fee has been considered for the space

occupied by the HMC as per sl.no. 1(a) of clause no

2.13–License fee (page-20 of Scale of Rate-2011). No

escalation factor have been considered. The amount has

been increased because the actual area required for the

operation of the HMC is more than the area considered

in the proposal.

(b)

As the PPT is aware, while fixing tariff

for HMC at PPT vide tariff order dated

30 December, 2009, the license fee for the HMC

for idling period of the year was considered for

months.

this

connection,

paragraph

No. 12(vi)(c)(v) of the order dated 30 December,

2009 may be referred. That being so, consideration

of license fee for 12 months by PPT needs

justification.

The license fee has been taken for 12 months as the area

is acquired by HMC operators due to utilization of the

area as store when there is no maintenance.

Subsequently, the PPT vide its email dated 19

November, 2014 (page 189/c) has stated that the license

fees is payable by the HMC operator on monthly basis

without any breakup.

The PPT to indicate the yearwise average

percentage of foreign and coastal cargo handled by

the HMC during the years 2010-11 to 2013-14.

The percentage of foreign and coastal cargoes handled

by HMC are as follows-

Year

Cargo handled in T/year

Percentage

Foreign

Coastal

Total

Foreign Coastal

1 2010-11 4011780

117044

4128824

97.17

2.83

2 2011-12 4903255

69710

4972965

98.60

1.40

3 2012-13 6922181

59093

6981274

99.15

0.85

4 2013-14 5719910

34985

5754895

99.39

0.61

(a)

During the fixation of hire charge for

HMC in PPT in December 2009, the hire charges

based on the daily performance of the Crane was

prescribed separately for each type of cargo viz.,

Dry Bulk Cargo, Break Bulk Cargo and for Others.

In the proposal under reference and as commented

by Orissa Stevedores Limited, the PPT has

proposed a common performance based rate for all

type of cargo viz., Dry Bulk Cargo, Break Bulk

Cargo and for Others. The reason for deviating

from the approach adopted during the last fixation

of hire charge remains unexplained. The PPT to

propose performance linked hire charge separately

for each type of cargo viz., Dry Bulk Cargo, Break

Bulk Cargo and for others.

The performance linked hire charge of each type of

cargo viz. Dry bulk, Break bulk and other as proposed is

enclosed.

(b)

The PPT has proposed to escalate the

proposed rate at 60% of the price index as

applicable to the PPP project subject to a

maximum limit of 3%. In this context, the PPT to

clarify the following:

(i)

The proposal of the PPT is being

considered as per the tariff guidelines of 2005.

That being so, the PPT to clarify whether it will be

appropriate to index the tariff to an extent of 60%

of the variation in price index as prescribed in

2008 guidelines.

The proposal for escalation of the rate at 60% of the

price index as applicable to PPP projects is as per clause

no 2.8-Over all approach of 2008 guidelines.

(ii)

The reason for restricting the escalation to

3% to be brought out.

The subject to a maximum limit of 3% is considered to

have a ceiling on the escalation.

10.

The hire charge of `82.45 per MT derived by the

port has been taken as the base for an average

output of above 7000 tonnes per day. In this

connection, it may be recalled that during the

fixation of hire charge for HMC in PPT in 2009,

The quantity of 7000 tonnes per day has been fixed for

convenience of the users and HMC operators to avoid

dispute. However, a few slabs have been kept in

comparison with the 2009 guide lines.

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY

[PART III—SEC. 4]

the benchmark level of output for Dry Bulk Cargo

was prescribed at 12500 tonnes per day, 6000

tonnes for Break Bulk cargo and 3750 tonnes for

Others. Benchmarking the performance level for all

types of cargo at a lower level of 7000 tonnes per

day may be justified. As observed by VISA Steel

Limited (VSL) and the VISA Suncoke Limited

(VSCL), benchmarking the per day output at a

lower level will increase the turnaround time of the

vessels with increase in the associated cost. The

PPT to follow the approach of prescription of hire

charges for HMC with benchmarking level of

12500 tonnes for dry bulk cargo, 6000 tonnes for

steel and bagged cargo at 3750 tonnes for others,

which is uniformly followed in respect of cases for

fixation of hire charge for HMC at other major port

trusts.

11.

Inspite of request made by us vide our letter of

even number dated 23 July 2014, the PPT has not

proposed conditionalities governing the application

of proposed rates. The PPT is to propose

conditionalities governing the levy of performance

linked tariff for each type of cargo proposed to be

handled througha HMC.

The conditionalities governing the application of

proposed rate are enclosed.

As stated above, the PPT has furnished a revised proposal. The revision is mainly seen to be to the extent of

change in the capital cost of HMC due to consideration of cost of 2 Nos. of additional grabs and change in the working

capital component, thereby resulting in changes in the operating costs which is calculated as a percentage of capital cost.

Also, the PPT has considered the rate of depreciation at 18.10% instead of 10.34% considered by it earlier.

A comparative position of the initial proposal of July 2014 and the revised proposal of September 2014 is tabulated

below:

Sr.

No.

Particulars

Norms

Initial proposal of July

2014

Revised proposal of

September 2014

` in Lakhs

` in lakhs

Cost

100T

Mobile

Harbour Cranes

(`Lakhs) (WDV)

(`2963.70 lakh original

3700.00

3900.00

Other Expenses (all other

facilities

required

for

operation of machine and

includes upfront premium

interest

working

capital

margin)

Statement

of other

expenses

` in

Lakh

950.00

` in

lakhs

Sundry

Debtors

months)

150.00

Spares

50.00

Total

200.00

200.00

1 Sundry

Debtors (2

months)

150.00

2 Upfront

Premium

750.00

3 Spares

50.00

Total

950.00

Total Capital Cost

4650.00

4100.00

Annual capacity (in

Million Tonnes)

2.00

III

Operating Cost

(a)

Fuel cost (As per actual)

0.08 ltrs per

tonne Rate per

Ltr. `72/-

115.20

(b)

Repairs & Maintenance cost

@5% of Equipment cost (As

per TAMP)

5% on cost of

mechanical

equipment

5%*

`3700 lakhs

185.00

5%*

`3900 lakhs

195.00

(c)

Insurance (As per TAMP)

1% on cost of

mechanical

equipment

1%*`3700 lakhs

37.00

1%*`3900 lakhs

39.00

¹Hkkx IIIµ[k.M 4º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vlk/kj.k

8.1.

A joint hearing on the case in reference was held on 22 September,,2014 at the premises of PPT in

Bhubaneshwar. The PPT made a brief power point presentation of its proposal. At the joint hearing, the PPT and the

concerned users/organization bodies/service providers have made their submissions.

8.2.

As decided at the joint hearing, the PPT was requested vide our letter dated 25 September, 2014 to take action

on some points. The PPT has responded under cover of its letter dated 30 September 2014. The points of action decided

at the joint hearing and the response of PPT thereon are tabulated below:

Sl.

No.

Points decided at the joint hearing

Response of PPT

(i)

The users present at the joint hearing had expressed

uncertainty on the discharge rate considered by the PPT to

arrive at the per tonne rate for HMC. During the hearing,

the PPT had made a mention about having considered the

discharge rate of about 7000 tonnes per day. Some of the

users were of the opinion that the discharge rate of 7000

tonnes per day is less. In this context, the PPT had agreed to

review the discharge rate of the HMC. The PPT, therefore,

to review the discharge rate of the HMC considered in its

initial proposal and furnish its revised proposal.

The discharge rate considered as 6000 tonnes

may be considered as 7000 tonnes as raised by

many users. This discharge rate may be

considered for arriving at a rate. However, for a

better discharge rate, the operator may be

rewarded and for a lower discharge rate, the

operator may be penalized.

(ii)

With reference to the upfront payment considered by PPT

as an item of capital cost, as agreed at the joint hearing, the

PPT to furnish a copy of the written instruction received by

it from the Ministry based on the recommendation of One

Man Committee regarding Upfront payment.

The copy of the document furnished by the PPT,

is a letter dated 24 July 2014, received by it

from the Dy. Secretary of Ministry of Shipping

(MOS), communicating the PPT about the

Action Points to be taken up by the PPT based

on the Report on Mechanisation Process at PPT.

The action point relating to the Upfront payment

as contained in the MOS letter is reproduced

below:

“Paradip Port should adopt revenue share

model with ‘penalty clauses for breakdown’ as

followed in other Major Ports in the new tender

instead of collection of upfront fees & Revenue

share or only upfront fee etc. Only revenue

share collection model may create more

competition among crane providers.”

(iii)

During the Joint hearing, the PPT had submitted that the

capital cost of `37 crores considered as the cost of 1 No. of

HMC is inclusive of cost of only 1 no. of grab, whereas, the

PPT would require 2 more grabs to ensure smooth

operation of HMC. The PPT had agreed to review its

proposal so as to include the cost of 2 more grabs. The PPT

to, therefore, revise the capital cost of the HMC and furnish

its revised proposal, based on the revised workings.

The observation is taken into account for revised

costing.

(d)

Depreciation (As per TAMP)

As per norms

prescribed in

Companies Act

10.34%*

`3700 lakhs

382.58

18.10%

WDV on

`3900 lakhs

492.60

(e)

Licensee Fee

As per scale of

rates

`1200 per

month*12

months

0.14

`1200 per

month*12

months*5

0.72

(f)

Other Expenses @5% of I

(As per TAMP)

5% of gross

fixed asset value

5%* `700 lakhs

185.00

5%* `3900

lakhs

195.00

Total=Sl. No. (a) to (f)

904.92

1037.52

ROCE@16% i.e., after

adjustment of depreciation

16% on Capital

employed

16%*

`4650 lakhs

744.00

16%*

`4100 lakhs

656.00

Total cost plus Return on

Investment

III + IV

1648.92

1693.52

Hire charges per shift

VII

Hire charges per tonne

(Foreign)

`1648.92 lakhs/

2 million tonnes

82.45

`1693.52 lakhs/

2 million tonnes

84.68

VIII

Hire charges per tonne

(Coastal)

60%*

`82.45

49.47

60%*

`84.68

50.81

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY

[PART III—SEC. 4]

9.1.

After the joint hearing, the Seaways Shipping and Logistics Limited (SSLL) vide its letter dated 23 September,

2014 has furnished its comments. In the said letter, the SSLL has mentioned that during the joint hearing, the Chairman

of the Authority and Chairman of PPT had declared that the HMC charges will be `1000/- per container per move at

PPT, as was paid by them earlier to the HMC operators. In this context, the SSLL has requested this Authority to issue a

circular towards fixation of HMC charges for handling of containers as declared in the meeting to convince their vessel

operators.

9.2.

A copy of the said letter dated 23 September 2014 was forwarded to PPT, vide our letter dated 26 September,

2014, seeking their specific comments. The PPT vide its letter dated 20 October, 2014, while responding to the

comments made by other users has mentioned that the rate on container handling througha HMC has been revised and

reflected in the revised proposal of September, 2014.

10.

The proceedings relating to consultation in this case are available on records at the office of this Authority.

An excerpt of the comments received and arguments made by the concerned parties will be sent separately to the

relevant parties. These details will also be made available at our website http://tariffauthority.gov.in.

11.

With reference to totality of the information collected during the processing of the case, the following position

emerges:

(i)

Provision of cranage facility is one of the services listed under Section 48 of the Major Port Trusts

Act, 1963 and, therefore, the tariff for providing cranage facility needs to be regulated by this

Authority. Section 42(4) of the MPT Act read with Section 48 requires this Authority to notify the

rates in respect of identified services provided by persons authorised under Section 42(3) of the MPT

Act. In cases where the authorization arrangement under Section 42(3) is other than by way of a BOT

Concession Agreement, Clause 7.2. of the tariff guidelines of March 2005 requires this Authority to

fix ceiling rates for such services to be applied commonly at the concerned ports without reference to

the individual service provider. It may be recalled that such an exercise of fixing common ceiling tariff

for the use of Harbour Mobile Crane (HMC) at PPT had earlier been undertaken in December 2009.

Now again, the PPT has come up with a proposal for fixation of a common ceiling rate of tariff for the

use of HMC at PPT without reference to any individual service provider. Though PPT is silent

whether its proposal is under Clause 7.2, it has to be recognised that fixation of common ceiling rate at

the Major Port Trusts is governed by Clause 7.2 of the 2005 Tariff Guidelines.

(ii)

The validity of the tariff fixed in December, 2009 has expired in January 2013. The Tariff Order of

December, 2009 was fraught with litigation and the said order has been set aside by the Hon’ble High

Court of Orissa and the appeal filed by this Authority in the Hon’ble Supreme Court challenging the

Order of the Hon’ble High Court also has been dismissed. Therefore, tariff for the tariff cycle covered

by the tariff Order of December, 2009 is required to be fixed afresh as per the directions of the

Hon’ble High Court of Orissa. The proposal filed in July, 2014 is for future tariff cycle and based on

the present cost of the Crane. A new crane will maintain productivity standard, reliability and keep the

downtime to the minimum.

(iii)

The PPT had initially filed its proposal in July, 2014. Subsequently, while responding to the queries

raised by us and based on the discussions held with the users/ service providers during the joint

hearing, the PPT has filed a revised proposal. As brought out earlier, the revision is mainly seen to be

to the extent of change in the capital cost of HMC due to consideration of cost of additional 2 Nos. of

grabs and change in the working capital component, thereby resulting in changes in the operating costs

which is calculated as a percentage of capital cost. Some change has also been proposed in the rate of

depreciation considered by it earlier. This revised proposal of September, 2014 alongwith the

information/ clarifications furnished by the PPT during the processing of the case is considered in this

analysis.

(iv)

Clause 2.4.1 of the tariff guidelines of 2005, inter alia, calls for making attempts to evolve normative

cost of each component of port operations. No specific guidelines have been laid down to fix tariff for

the use of HMCs, either under 2005 tariff guidelines nor under 2008 tariff guidelines.

Clause 7.2 of the said tariff guidelines, under which the proposal is being considered, does not specify

any particular tariff fixing methodology but only talks about the procedural aspects of filing tariff

proposal and fixing tariff irrespective of the operator. Since separate set of norms under Clause 2.4.1.

are not evolved, the norms prescribed in the tariff guidelines of 2008 are relied upon to test the

reasonableness of the norms adopted by the PPT. It is noteworthy that such an approach has been

adopted while fixing the tariff for the use of HMC in the cases relating to fixation of tariff for HMCs

(governed by Clause 7.2 of the 2005 guidelines) at other major port trusts. The proposal of PPT is

discussed elaborately in the subsequent paragraphs.

(v)

Capacity of the 100 Tonne HMC:

(a)

In order to arrive at the proposed hire charge for the use of HMC, the PPT has considered the

average of the actual cargo handled by 1 no. of HMC for a period of seven years in the past

from 2007-08 to 2013-14, as base.

¹Hkkx IIIµ[k.M 4º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vlk/kj.k

(b)

In terms of clause 7.2 of the ‘Tariff Guidelines, 2005’ and following the approach adopted by

this Authority in fixation of common ceiling tariff under Clause 7.2 of the tariff guidelines of

2005 for operation of HMC by private operators at some of the major port trusts like New

Mangalore Port Trust (NMPT), V.O Chidambaranar Port Trust (VOCPT) and Visakhapatnam

Port Trust (VPT), the PPT was specifically requested to review its proposal based on the

normative capacity of the HMC, instead of considering the past actual traffic handled by the

different service providers. In this connection, it was also pointed out to PPT that even during

the fixation of hire charges for HMC at PPT in December 2009, the hire charge was fixed

based on the normative capacity of the HMC as then proposed by PPT.

(c)

Inspite of the specific request, the PPT did not consider normative capacity of the HMC. In

view of cost escalation with efflux of time, the rate fixed in 2009 may not be attractive in the

year 2013 or 2014. But, this cannot be the ground to deviate from the fundamental approach

followed in all such cases. What transpired in the discussion, the PPT had with the users,

which is cited as one of the reasons to deviate from the normative capacity based approach,

has not been made available to this Authority. In view of this position, this Authority is not

inclined to deviate from the normative capacity based approach of fixing tariff for the HMC

uniformly followed in all such cases in other Major Port Trusts. The fixation of tariff based

on normative approach linked to performance would encourage an operator to bring

efficiency in operations and protects the users from inefficient operations.

(d)

The PPT envisages to handle three cargo categories viz., dry bulk cargo, break bulk cargo and

other cargo. However, the PPT has not considered cargo handling rate for any category of the

cargo, to determine the optimum capacity. The linkage of the proposed rate of `82.45 per

tonne to the per day output of above 7000 tonnes is not based on any norms or scientific

analysis but to suit the convenience of the service provider. Therefore, the handling rate of

12500 tonnes per day for dry bulk cargo, 6000 tonnes per day in respect of break bulk cargo

and 3750 tonnes per day in respect of other cargo as per the handling norms uniformly

adopted in fixation of tariff for a 100 Tonne HMC in the other Major Port Trusts are

considered in the analysis.

(e)

Considering 4000 working hours per annum as normative level of working hours (as

considered in fixation of tariff for HMC under Clause 7.2 at other Major Port Trusts) the

normative capacity of the HMC works out to 2.98 million tonnes incase of exclusive handling

of dry bulk cargo, 1.43 million tonnes incase of exclusive handling of break bulk cargo and

0.89 million tonnes incase of exclusive handling of other cargo.

(vi)

Capital Cost:

(a)

The PPT has estimated the capital cost of the 100 tonne HMC at `4100 lakhs. This capital

cost consists of three components viz., cost of the HMC at `3700 lakhs along with one grab

of 37 cbm, cost of 2 Nos. of grabs at `200 lakhs and other expenses to cover sundry debtors

and spares to the tune of `200 lakhs.

(b)

The documentary evidence furnished by the PPT in support of the cost of the HMC reflects

the basic cost of HMC at 3430000 Euros and transportation component to the tune of 270000

Euros with the exchange rate of `80 per Euro as considered by PPT and taking into account

the component of customs duty @ 25% on the cost of HMC, the cost of HMC is worked out

to `3700 lakhs by the PPT.

The cost of HMC including transportation has been updated by considering an Exchange rate

of `77.09 per Euro, to reflect the exchange rate prevailing at the time of analysis of this case.

The customs duty is considered at 25%, as proposed by the PPT, on the updated cost of

HMC.

(c)

The PPT has not furnished documentary evidence in support of cost of grabs. However, the

cost of one grab considered at `100 lakhs is seen to be reasonable when verified with

reference to cost of grabs considered in other upfront/reference tariff cases, where use of

grabs has been envisaged. The cost of grabs is, therefore, relied upon in the analysis.

(d)

The PPT has considered other capital cost to the tune of about `200 lakhs so as to factor the

sundry debtors at `150 lakhs and cost of spares at `50 lakhs. It appears that the intention of

the PPT in this regard is to cover the working capital component. If reference is drawn to the

norm prescribed in the guidelines for multipurpose cargo terminal as well as other cargo

terminals, it provides for consideration of miscellaneous capital cost at 5% of equipment cost

to cover working capital margin and Interest during construction, among other things.

Therefore, if 5% of the estimated capital cost of `3765.41 is considered, it works out to

`188.27 lakhs.

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY

[PART III—SEC. 4]

(e)

Thus, the total Capital cost of the HMC works out to `3953.68 lakhs as against `4100 lakhs

considered by the PPT.

(vii)

Operating Cost.

(a)

Fuel:

While prescribing the hire charge for a 100 tonne HMC at the other Major Port Trusts, the

fuel consumption of 70 litres per hour per HMC for 4000 hours per annum, is considered.

The PPT in its proposal, by considering the filling factor, cargo density, grab capacity etc.,

has estimated fuel consumption to the tune of 0.08 litres per tonne. The fuel consumption

based on 0.08 litres per tonne is reported to be less than the fuel consumption envisaged based

on 70 litres per hour, by PPT.

The Orissa Stevedores Limited (OSL) and Utkal Chamber of Commerce and Industry (UCCI)

have expressed inadequacy of the fuel consumption considered by the PPT.

In this connection, considering the consumption of 70 litres per hour, as is considered in other

HMC cases, it works out to a consumption of about 0.09 litres per tonne (70 litres per hour/

744 tonnes per hour) in respect of dry bulk cargo, 0.19 litres per tonne (70 litres per hour/357

tonnes per hour) in respect of break bulk cargo and 0.31 litres per tonne (70 litres per hour/

223 tonnes per hour) in respect of other cargo. Thus, as rightly brought out by PPT, these

consumption norms are seen to be higher than the consumption of 0.08 litres per tonne

considered by the PPT.

In this regard, it is relevant here to mention that the HMC at PPT is envisaged to handle all

types of cargo i.e. dry bulk cargo, break bulk cargo and other cargo. In such scenario, when

the HMC is used exclusively to handle dry bulk cargo, the consumption of 0.08 litres per

tonne considered by the PPT may be appropriate. However, if the HMC is deployed

exclusively to handle break bulk cargo or other cargo, the consumption of 0.08 litres per tonne

considered by the PPT may not be sufficient. In view of this position, it is felt appropriate to

consider the fuel consumption of 70 litres per hour per HMC for 4000 hours per annum, as

uniformly considered at other Major Port Trusts for similar cases.

Generally, for estimating the fuel cost, the cost of normal High Speed Diesel (HSD) is

considered. During the consultation proceedings relating to fixing tariff for HMC in PPT, in

compliance to the directions of the Hon’ble High Court of Orissa, some of the service

providers had then submitted that they use premium diesel for HMC operations, which is

costlier than the normal HSD, which was not objected by the PPT. In such a scenario, it is felt

appropriate to consider the prevailing rate of premium diesel at `60.83 per litre, to arrive at

the fuel cost.

(b)

Repairs and Maintenance cost, Insurance cost and Other Expenses are estimated at 5%, 1%

and 5% of the capital cost of the HMC by PPT, which is seen to be in line with the

percentages considered for estimating the above said expenses, while fixing tariff for the use

of HMC at other major port trusts. The PPT is not seen to have considered the component of

the Miscellaneous Capital cost while arriving at the above said expenses. In our analysis, the

component of the Miscellaneous Capital cost is also considered while determining the above

mentioned expenses.

(c)

Depreciation:

Responding to the observation made by the Orissa Stevedores Ltd. (OSL), the PPT, in its

revised proposal has considered depreciation at 18.10%, reportedly based on the provisions of

the Companies Act, 2013. The PPT has, however, not quoted the reference to the relevant

provision of the Companies Act, 2013, based on which it has arrived at the depreciation rate

of 18.10%.

In this connection, it is relevant here to mention that during the disposal of the proposal

received from the Chennai Port Trust (CHPT) for fixation of Reference tariff for the use of

HMC, the CHPT had then submitted that the provisions as per the Companies Act, 2013

(Schedule II of section 123 Part C(K) (2) and notes under Serial No. 6 of the Companies Act

2013), suggest that the useful life of heavy lift equipment be considered as 20 years. This

translates to a depreciation rate of 5% per annum. However, the Act also suggests that the

depreciation rate be increased by 100% of existing rate in case of a three shift operation. This

would mean that the depreciation rate of 5% gets doubled to 10%. Accordingly, the

depreciation in the case of HMC was considered at 10% of capital cost of the HMC.

In the absence of indication of the relevant provision of the Companies Act, 2013, based on

which PPT has arrived at the depreciation rate of 18.10%, this Authority is not in a position to

¹Hkkx IIIµ[k.M 4º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vlk/kj.k

consider depreciation at 18.10% per annum. It is, therefore, considered at 10% per annum

based on the reference furnished by the CHPT then.

(d)

Licence fee:

The licence fee for port land is to be estimated based on the rates prescribed in the Scale of

Rates (SOR) of the respective Major Port Trusts. Licence fee has been estimated by the PPT

for an area of 500 sq. metres of land area at the rate of `12/- per sq. metre per month for a

period of 12 months. The requirement of the area of 500 sq. mtr as estimated by PPT is relied

upon. With reference to the rate of license fee the PPT has stated to have considered the

License fee as prescribed in the prevailing scale of rates of the port and the port has not

considered the escalation factor in the licence fee.

The reason for not considering escalation factor by the PPT to arrive at the licence fee

prevailing during the year 2014 remains unexplained. Further, it is not clear as to the year

from when the rate of `12/- per sq. metre is being implemented by the PPT, as the general

revision proposal of PPT in the past i.e. 2011 as well as 2007 (when this Authority has

disposed the general revision proposals of PPT), reflect the rate of licence fee at `12/- per sq.

metre. The position prior to the year 2007 is not available.

In view of the above position, the rate of `12/- per sq. metre per month is considered in the

analysis as estimated by the port, without considering escalation factor. Since the prescription

in the existing SOR is `12/- per sq.mtr., the payment of license by the service provider to the

port will be at this level only.

Since the license fee is payable by the operator without any break, as confirmed by the port,

the license fee is considered for the entire period of 12 months in the analysis, instead of

7 months idle period of the HMC generally considered while disposing HMC cases of other

major port trusts including the PPT HMC Order of December 2009.

(viii)

Return on Capital Employed is allowed at 16% of the estimated capital cost of the HMC.

(ix)

Thus, the annual revenue requirement, which is the sum total of the annual operating cost and the

return on the capital employed, works out to `1633.91 lakhs, as against the revenue requirement of

`1693.52 lakhs, estimated by the PPT.

(x)

As per policy direction of the Government, concessional tariff is to be prescribed for coastal cargo

(other than thermal coal and POL including crude oil, iron ore and iron ore pellets) not exceeding 60%

of the normal cargo/vessel related charges. The government policy of allowing concessional rate for

coastal cargo is binding on PPT as well as this Authority. Therefore, it is not possible to fix a common

rate for foreign cargo and costal cargo, as requested by the OSL. In any case, the concession allowed

on Coastal cargo is built into the calculation of rate for foreign cargo. From the details furnished by the

PPT, it is seen that the average ratio of foreign and coastal cargo handled by the HMC during the years

2010-11 to 2013-14 works out to 98.71 : 1.29. This position is considered.

(xi)

Thus, considering the normative capacity of the HMC at 2.98 million tonnes incase of exclusive

handling of dry bulk cargo, 1.43 million tonnes incase of exclusive handling of break bulk cargo and

0.89 million tonnes incase of exclusive handling of other cargo and based on the Annual revenue

requirement of `1633.91 lakhs and based on the ratio of foreign and coastal cargo, the per tonne rate

works out to `55.18 per MT for Dry Bulk Cargo, `114.97 per MT for Break Bulk Cargo and `183.95

per MT in respect of Other cargo, as against the rate of `84.68 per MT for Dry Bulk Cargo, `176.11

per MT for Break Bulk Cargo and `281.95 per MT for Other cargo, as proposed by the port.

(xii)

The difference in rate approved by this Authority and proposed by the PPT is mainly attributable to

difference arising due to consideration of the normative capacity based approach based on the

approach uniformly adopted by this Authority in the disposal of similar cases of other major port trusts

as compared to the approach considered by PPT of basing its calculations on the actual/estimated

traffic.

(xiii)

(a)

It is relevant here to mention that the PPT in addition to proposing of rates for handling Dry

Bulk Cargo, Break Bulk Cargo and Other cargo, has also proposed the rate for handling of

containers by HMC at `2000/- per container in its revised proposal of September, 2014.

However, the PPT has not furnished any basis or workings to arrive at the rate for handling

containers by the HMC, from the revenue requirement pertaining to HMC.

(b)

In this connection, it is relevant to recall here that recently, this Authority vide its Order

No. TAMP/25/2013-MOPT dated 04 August 2014 has fixed tariff for handling of containers by

a 100 tonne HMC. With regard to normative capacity of handling containers by a 100 tonne

HMC, for the reasons mentioned in the said Order, the handling rate of 20 moves per hour per

HMC was relied upon. Considering the same handling rate of 20 moves per hour and based on

4000 hours of operation of an HMC in the instant case, the normative capacity of the HMC at

PPT works out to 80000 containers incase of exclusive handling of containers. Further,

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY

[PART III—SEC. 4]

considering the revenue requirement of `1633.91 lakhs, as already discussed in the preceding

paragraph, the rate for handling a container by HMC works out to about `2042/-.

However, this cannot be prescribed as it is, for the reason that the share of various types of

containers comprising of different categories and sizes of containers i.e. laden and empty, 20’/

40’ and above 40’ containers in TEUs handled, hazardous, over dimensional, would have a

bearing on the revenue requirement. For example, the handling charges for one 40’ container

will be 1.5 times that for the 20’ container, the handling charges for one above 40’ container

will be 2 times that for the 20’ container, handling rate for hazardous containers will be 1.25

times of the normal container. In the absence of any such analysis made available by the PPT, it

is not found possible to prescribe rates for handling of containers by the HMC at PPT. Further,

as stated earlier, the rate for handling of containers by HMC at `2000/- per container has been

proposed by the port in its revised proposal of September 2014. As a result, the users/service

providers are unaware of such a proposal. In view of the overall position, the PPT is advised to

file a well analysed proposal, if it so desires, to arrive at the rate for handling various types of

containers (within the normative capacity of 80000 containers) by the HMC based on the

revenue requirement of `1633.91 lakhs, as already assessed.

(c)

During the proceedings relating to the case in reference as also mentioned by the PPT in its

draft Scale of Rates, it has been brought out by some users/service providers that the HMC

operators at PPT are currently charging `1000/- per container for handling containers. This

Authority has so far not prescribed any rate for handling of containers by the HMC at PPT. The

basis for the said levy is not known. The PPT is, therefore, advised to refrain from levying any

charges or allow levy of any charges by the service provider, which does not have the approval

of this Authority.

(d)

No declaration was made either by this Authority or by the PPT at the joint hearing that the

HMC charge will be `1000/- per container per move at the PPT, as claimed by the SSLL. When

sought specific comments of PPT in this regard, the PPT has also not confirmed any such

declaration but simply stated that it has proposed rate for container handling in its revised

proposal of September 2014.

(xiv)

Based on the above position, the cost statement furnished by the PPT has been modified. The modified

cost statement is attached as Annex.

(xv)

(a)

Clause 5.9 of the 2005 Guidelines calls for linking tariff to the benchmark levels of

productivity, providing incentive for better performance and disincentive for performance

below the benchmark levels. Accordingly, performance linked tariff has been prescribed not

only at PPT but also at other major port trusts where the use of HMC is envisaged based on

deployment of HMC by the service providers. The tariff has been prescribed for each type of

cargo i.e. dry bulk cargo, break bulk cargo and other cargo, by taking into account the base

performance level at 12500 tonnes per day, 6000 tonnes per day and 3750 tonnes per day

respectively, based on the handling rates considered while determining the normative

capacity.

(b)

In its proposed Scale of Rates furnished by the PPT alongwith its revised proposal of

September 2014, the PPT has proposed performance linked charges based on the base

performance level of 7001-9000 tonnes per day in respect of dry bulk cargo, 3501-5500

tonnes per day in respect of break bulk cargo and 2001-4000 tonnes per day in respect of

other cargo. For any increase in the performance level above the base level, the PPT has

proposed a flat 5% increase in the base rates and for any reduction in the performance level

below the base level, the PPT has proposed a flat 5% reduction in the base rates. The base

performance level proposed by PPT is not supported by any analysis.

(c)

As discussed earlier, the output norm of 12500 tonnes for dry bulk cargo, 6000 tonnes per day

for break bulk cargo and 3750 tonnes per day for other cargo has been considered to arrive at

the base rate. Therefore, the cutoff point is also required to be linked to the normative level of

handling rate for each type of cargo, as stated above.

(d)

With regard to prescription of incentive for better performance, a 5% increase at the level

proposed by the PPT and that also prevailing in the existing scenario is retained. However,

with regard to prescription of disincentive for under performance, if the rate for performance

below the benchmark level is prescribed, it may lead to the HMC operator not in a position to

recover the estimated annual revenue requirement, thereby putting the operator into a

disadvantageous position. Thus, it is felt appropriate that irrespective of performance below

the base level, the HMC operator should be in a position to atleast recover the base rate

pertaining to the specific cargo category. In view of this position, no rate at reduced level is

prescribed for any reduction in the performance level below the base level.

(xvi)

The general notes proposed by the PPT, which are found to be in consonance with the general notes

approved for similar cases at other Major Port Trusts, are approved.

¹Hkkx IIIµ[k.M 4º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vlk/kj.k

(xvii)

The proposal of the PPT to index the proposed rate to the whole sale Price Index (WPI) to the extent of

60% of the WPI, capping such indexation to 3% per annum is based on 2008 guidelines. Since the

proposal for fixation of tariff for HMC is processed under 2005 tariff guidelines, it is not found

possible to approve the proposed arrangement.

12.1.

In the result, and for the reasons given above, and based on a collective application of mind, this Authority

approves to replace the following provision in place of the existing provision contained at Section 2.15(B) in the

existing Scale of Rates of PPT in Chapter – II, Cargo related charges:

“2.15 (B)

Charges for use of 100 Tonne Harbour Mobile Crane installed by the private operators:

(i)

For Dry Bulk Cargo

Average daily crane

performance

( in Metric Tonne)

Ceiling rate per tonne

(in `)

Foreign

Coastal

12500

55.18

33.11

12501-13500

57.94

34.77

13501 – 14500

60.70

36.42

Note:

To calculate the incremental ceiling rates as shown above, the base rate was

enhanced to 105% for first thousand tonnes and for the 2nd thousand tonnes

the rate was enhanced to 110% of the base rate. The same methodology

shall also be adopted to calculate the rate beyond 14500 tonnes.

(ii)

For Break Bulk Cargo

Average daily crane

performance

( in Metric Tonne)

Ceiling rate per tonne

(in `)

Foreign

Coastal

6000

114.97

68.98

6001-7000

120.72

72.43

Note:

To calculate the incremental ceiling rates as shown above, the base rate was

enhanced to 105% for first thousand tonnes. The same methodology shall

also be adopted to calculate the rate beyond 7000 tonnes.

(iii)

For Other cargo

Average daily crane

performance

( in Metric Tonne)

Ceiling rate per tonne

(in `)

Foreign

Coastal

3750

183.95

110.37

3751-4750

193.14

115.89

Note:

To calculate the incremental ceiling rates as shown above, the base rate was

enhanced to 105% for first thousand tonnes. The same methodology shall

also be adopted to calculate the rate beyond 4750 tonnes.

Notes:

(i)

The formula for calculation of average berth-day output is as follows:-

Total Quantity loaded/unloaded by HMC X 24 hrs.

Total time taken from vessel commencement to completion

(ii)

According to the average berth-day output for the vessel from commencement to completion

of loading/discharge of cargo, the appropriate rate of crane hire charge will be chosen for

recovery from Port users for the full quantity of cargo loaded/discharged.

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY

[PART III—SEC. 4]

(iii)

If one HMC works with another HMC or ELL crane/s, the Berth-day output for the crane will

be ascertained on the basis of the quantity as recorded by the HMC’s load meter.

(iv)

In case of breakdown of the crane for more than one hour till the vessel leaves the berth, the

quantity handled by HMC will be determined taking into account cargo loaded/discharged

prior to break-down divided by crane working hours and multiplied by 24.

(v)

In case of stoppages of operation of HMC for more than two hours at a stretch for reasons not

attributable to the HMC, appropriate allowance will be allowed to the crane while calculating

the total time of crane operation in the vessel. Stoppages of HMC for less than 2 hours will

not be taken into consideration for the above purpose. No allowance will be allowed for

stoppages attributable to the HMC. All stoppages in loading/unloading operations during

working of HMC are required to be certified by the Stevedore of the vessel in the daily vessel

performance report.

(vi)

In case shifting of a vessel becomes necessary due to breakdown/non-performance of HMC,

the shifting charges of the vessel from berth to anchorage will be recovered from the crane

operator in addition to a penalty of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees one lakh ) only. The shifting

charges so recovered will be refunded to the vessel’s agent while the penalty will be retained

by the Port.

(vii)

In case of dispute on the average output, the decision of the Port Trust will be final and

binding.”

12.2.

The rate approved shall come into effect after expiry of 30 days from the date of notification of the Order in the

Gazette of India and shall remain in force for a period of three years. The approval accorded would automatically lapse

unless specifically extended by this Authority.

12.3.

As per clause 7.2. of the tariff guidelines, the rate approved by this Authority for Harbour Mobile Crane is a

ceiling rate and will apply commonly at the port for identical facility/ service offered at the port without reference to any

particular service provider. As per Clause 7.3. of the tariff guidelines, the Port Trust should ensure by suitably including

a necessary condition in the authorization arrangement that the authorized service providers do not charge more than the

prescribed ceiling rates.

T. S. BALASUBRAMANIAN, Member (Finance)

[ADVT. III/4/Exty./143/2014]

ANNEX

CALCULATION SHEET TO ARRIVE AT THE PER TONNE HANDLING RATE FOR THE 100 TONNE

MOBILE HAROUR CRANE AT PARADIP PORT TRUST

(Rs. in lakhs)

Sl.

No.

Description

Estimates furnished in the Revised

proposal of PPT dated 29.09.2014

Estimates as moderated by

TAMP

Optimal capacity

Dry

Bulk

Cargo

Break

Bulk

Cargo

Other

Cargo

(i)

Cargo Share

100%

(ii)

Cargo Handling rate in tonnes per day

12500

6000

3750

(ii)

Cargo Handling rate in tonnes per hour

744

357

223

(iv)

Total Working Hours in a year

4000

(v)

No. of HMCs considered

(vi)

Individual cargo capacity (i*ii*iv*v)

2976190

1428571

892857

(vii)

Annual Handling capacity (in lakh Tonnes)

29.76

14.29

8.93

(viii)

Annual Handling capacity (in Million tonnes)

2.00

2.98

1.43

0.89

CAPITAL COST

(i)

Cost of 100T Mobile Harbour Cranes With 2 Nos. of

Grab

PPT- (€ 3430000+ € 270000)* Rs. 80

TAMP-(€ 3430000+ € 270000)* Rs. 77.09

2,960.00

2,852.33

(ii)

Cost of additional 2 Nos. of Grabs

200.00

(iii)

Custom Duty @ 25% of cost of HMC

740.00

713.08

(iv)

Miscellaneous Capital Cost (PPT – Rs. 200 lakhs)

(TAMP - 5% of Capital cost)

200.00

188.27

TOTAL of II (i+ii)

4,100.00

3,953.68

III

OPERATING COST PER ANNUM

¹Hkkx IIIµ[k.M 4º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vlk/kj.k

(i)

Fuel Cost :

(PPT - 0.08 Ltrs per tonne* Rate per ltr Rs. 72 * 20

lakh Tonnes) (TAMP - 70

ltr per hour* `60.83 rate per ltr * 4000 hours)

115.20

170.32

(ii)

Maintenance & Repair:

(PPT - @ 5% on Equipment cost)

(TAMP - @ 5% on Equipment cost)

195.00

197.68

(iii)

Insurance @ 1% on Capital cost

39.00

39.54

(iv)

Depreciation:

(PPT - 18.10% of WDV of Capital cost)

(TAMP - 10% of Capital Cost)

492.60

395.37

(v).

License fee

(PPT & TAMP - Rs. 12/- per sq.mtr per month * 500

sq.mtr * 12 months)

0.72

(vi)

Other expenses @ 5% of Capital Cost

195.00

197.68

Total Operating Cost (Sum i to vi)

1,037.52

1,001.32

Return on Capital Employed @ 16%

656.00

632.59

Estimated Annual Revenue Requirement:

(a) Total Operating Cost

1,037.52

1,001.32

(b) Return on Capital Employed

656.00

632.59

1,693.52

1,633.91

Cost per MT

Dry

Bulk

Cargo

Brea

Bulk

Carg

Other

Cargo

Container

Dry

Bulk

Cargo

Break

Bulk

Cargo

Other

Cargo

(a) Total Annual Requirement (` in lakhs)

1,693.52

1,633.91

(b) Capacity

2000000

2976190

1428571

892857

(c) Cost Per MT

(i) Foreign

84.68

176.1

281.95

2000.00

55.18

114.97

183.95

(ii) Coastal

33.11

68.98

110.37

Printed by the Manager, Government of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi-110064

and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi-110054.