jftLVªh lañ Mhñ ,yñ—(,u)04@0007@2003—18
vlk/kkj.k
EXTRAORDINARY
Hkkx II — [k.M 2
PART II — Section 2
izkf/kdkj ls izdkf'kr
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
lañ 21]
ubZ fnYyh] lkseokj] fnlEcj 17] 2018@vxzgk;.k 26] 1940 ¼'kd½
No. 21] NEW DELHI, MONDAY, DECEMBER 17, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 26, 1940 (SAKA)
bl Hkkx esa fHkUu i`"B la[;k nh tkrh gS ftlls fd ;g vyx ladyu ds :i esa j[kk tk ldsA
Separate paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation.
REGISTERED NO. DL—(N)04/0007/2003—18
LOK SABHA
————
The following Bill was introduced in Lok Sabha on 17th December, 2018:—
BILL NO. 181 OF 2018
A Bill to protect the rights of married Muslim women and to prohibit divorce by
pronouncing talaq by their husbands and to provide for matters connected
therewith or incidental thereto.
BE it enacted by Parliament in the Sixty-ninth Year of the Republic of India as
follows:—
CHAPTER I
PRELIMINARY
1. (1) This Act may be called the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage)
Act, 2018.
(2) It shall extend to the whole of India, except the State of Jammu and Kashmir.
(3) It shall be deemed to have come into force on the 19th September, 2018.
Short title,
extent and
commencement.
2
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA EXTRAORDINARY
[PART II—
2. In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,—
(a) ‘‘electronic form’’ shall have the same meaning as assigned to it in
clause (r) of sub-section (1) of section 2 of the Information Technology Act, 2000;
(b) ‘‘Magistrate’’ means a Judicial Magistrate of the first class exercising
jurisdiction under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, in the area where the
married Muslim woman resides; and
(c) ‘‘talaq’’ means talaq-e-biddat or any other similar form of talaq having
the effect of instantaneous and irrevocable divorce pronounced by a Muslim
husband.
CHAPTER II
DECLARATION OF TALAQ TO BE VOID AND ILLEGAL
3. Any pronouncement of talaq by a Muslim husband upon his wife, by words,
either spoken or written or in electronic form or in any other manner whatsoever, shall be
void and illegal.
4. Any Muslim husband who pronounces talaq referred to in section 3 upon his
wife shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years, and
shall also be liable to fine.
CHAPTER III
PROTECTION OF RIGHTS OF MARRIED MUSLIM WOMEN
5. Without prejudice to the generality of the provisions contained in any other law
for the time being in force, a married Muslim woman upon whom talaq is pronounced
shall be entitled to receive from her husband such amount of subsistence allowance, for
her and dependent children, as may be determined by the Magistrate.
6. Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force,
a married Muslim woman shall be entitled to custody of her minor children in the event of
pronouncement of talaq by her husband, in such manner as may be determined by the
Magistrate.
7. Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973,—
(a) an offence punishable under this Act shall be cognizable, if information
relating to the commission of the offence is given to an officer in charge of a police
station by the married Muslim woman upon whom talaq is pronounced or any
person related to her by blood or marriage;
(b) an offence punishable under this Act shall be compoundable, at the instance
of the married Muslim woman upon whom talaq is pronounced with the permission
of the Magistrate, on such terms and conditions as he may determine;
(c) no person accused of an offence punishable under this Act shall be released
on bail unless the Magistrate, on an application filed by the accused and after hearing
the married Muslim woman upon whom talaq is pronounced, is satisfied that there
are reasonable grounds for granting bail to such person.
8. (1) The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Ordinance, 2018, is
hereby repealed.
(2) Notwithstanding such repeal, anything done or any action taken under the said
Ordinance shall be deemed to have been done or taken under the provisions of this Act.
Definitions.
21 of 2000.
Talaq to be
void and
illegal.
Punishment for
pronouncing
talaq.
Custody of
minor children.
Subsistence
allowance.
Offence to be
cognizable,
compoundable,
etc.
2 of 1974.
2 of 1974.
Repeal and
savings.
Ord. 7
of 2018.
SEC. 2]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA EXTRAORDINARY
3
STATEMENT OF OBJECTS AND REASONS
The Supreme Court in the matter of Shayara Bano Vs. Union of India and others and
other connected matters, on 22nd August, 2017, in a majority judgment of 3:2, set aside the
practice of talaq-e-biddat (three pronouncements of talaq, at one and the same time) practiced
by certain Muslim husbands to divorce their wives. This judgment gave a boost to liberate
Indian Muslim women from the age-old practice of capricious and whimsical method of
divorce, by some Muslim men, leaving no room for reconciliation.
2. The petitioner in the above said case challenged, inter alia, talaq-e-biddat on the
ground that the said practice is discriminatory and against dignity of women. The judgment
vindicated the position taken by the Government that talaq-e-biddat is against constitutional
moraility, dignity of women and the principles of gender equality, as also against gender
equity guaranteed under the Constitution. The All India Muslim Personal Law Board
(AIMPLB), which was the 7th respondent in the above case, in their affidavit, inter alia,
contended that it was not for the judiciary to decide matters of religious practices such as
talaq-e-biddat, but for the legislature to make any law on the same. They had also submitted
in the Supreme Court that they would issue advisories to the members of the community
against this practice.
3. In spite of the Supreme Court setting aside talaq-e-biddat, and the assurance of
AIMPLB, there have been reports of divorce by way of talaq-e-biddat from different parts
of the country. It is seen that setting aside talaq-e-biddat by the Supreme Court has not
worked as any deterrent in bringing down the number of divorces by this practice among
certain Muslims. It is, therefore, felt that there is a need for State action to give effect to the
order of the Supreme Court and to redress the grievances of victims of illegal divorce.
4. In order to prevent the continued harassment being meted out to the hapless married
Muslim women due to talaq-e-biddat, urgent suitable legislation was necessary to give
some relief to them. Therefore, to protect the rights of married Muslim women who are
being divorced by triple talaq, a Bill, namely, the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on
Marriage) Bill, 2017, was introduced in, and passed by, the Lok Sabha on the 28th December,
2017 and is pending in Rajya Sabha.
5. The aforesaid Bill proposed to declare the practice of triple talaq as void and illegal
and made it an offence punishable with imprisonment up to three years and fine, and triable
by a Judicial Magistrate of the first class. It was also proposed to provide subsistence
allowance to married Muslim women and dependent children and also for the custody of
minor children. The Bill further provided to make the offence cognizable and non-bailable.
6. Apprehensions have been raised in and outside Parliament regarding the provisions
of the pending Bill which enables any person to give information to an officer
in-charge of a police station to take cognizance of the offence and making the offence
non-bailable.
7. In order to address the above concerns, it has been decided to make the offence
cognizable, if the information relating to the commission of an offence is given to an officer
in-charge of a police station by the married Mulsim women upon whom talaq is pronounced
or any person related to her by blood or marriage. It is also decided to make the offence
non-bailable and compoundable at the instance of the married Muslim woman with the
permission of the Magistrate, on such terms and conditions as he may determine.
8. As the Bill is pending for consideration in Rajya Sabha and the practice of divorce
by triple talaq (i.e., talaq-e-biddat) was continuing, there was an urgent need to take
immediate action to prevent such practice by making stringent provisions in the law. Since
both Houses of Parliament were not in session and circumstances exist which render it
necessary for the President to take immediate action in the matter, the Muslim Women
(Protection of Rights on Marriage) Ordinance, 2018, with aforesaid changes was promulgated
on the 19th September, 2018.
9. Accordingly, to replace the said Ordinance, the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights
on Marriage) Bill, 2018 is being introduced in Parliament.
10. The legislation would help in ensuring the larger Constitutional goals of gender
justice and gender equality of married Muslim women and help subserve their fundamental
rights of non-discrimination and empowerment.
11. The Bill seeks to achieve the above objectives.
NEW DELHI;
RAVI SHANKAR PRASAD.
The 10th December, 2018.
MGIPMRND—2555GI(S3)—18-12-2018.
UPLOADED BY THE MANAGER, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA PRESS, MINTO ROAD, NEW DELHI–110002
AND PUBLISHED BY THE CONTROLLER OF PUBLICATIONS, DELHI–110054.
————
SNEHLATA SHRIVASTAVA
Secretary General
4
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA EXTRAORDINARY
[PART II—SEC. 2]
MANOJ
KUMAR
Digitally signed
by MANOJ
KUMAR
Date: 2018.12.21
18:06:21 +05'30'