32;

THE GAZETTE OF TNDIA : SEPTEMBER S, 2001/BliADRA 17, 1923

[PART JI—SEC. 3(hi)]

ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDTA

ORDFR

New Delhi, the 18th June, ?00l

O. N. 114.—Whereas, Shri Malojirao Sadashiv

Mogal,

At-Mauje

Sukene, Post-Kasabc

Sukene,

Tal.-Niphftd, Disl.-Nashik, Maharashtra, a contest-

ing candidate for the General Ejection to Legis-

lative

Assembly

f.om

70-Niphad

Assembly

Constituency

held

September,

1999

was

disqualified by the Election Commission of India

vide its order No. 76

MT-LA/99

dated

9th

October, 2000 under section 10A of the Represen-

tation of the People Act 1951 for failure to lodge

the account in the manner as required by the

said Act and Rule made thereunder ; and

Whereas,

the

said

Shri

Malojirao

Sadashi v

Mogal had submitted a petition dated 18th July

1999 before the Election Comniijjion

India

for removal of disqualification

imposed on him,

giving reasons for his

failure

lodge

the

account in the manner ; and

Whereas, afler

considering

the said petiiion

and taking into account all material facts of the-

case the Election Commission, in exercise of the

powers

conferred

the Section

11 of

the

Representation of the People Act, 1951, has vide

its order dated 18th Juno, 2001 lias removed the

disqualification of Shri Malojirao Sadashiv Mogal

imposed

upon

him

by the CommisMon's order

dated 9th October, 2000 under section 10A of

the said Act with effect from

18th June, 2001,

for the remaining period ;

Now, therefore, the name of the said Shri

Malojirao Sadashiv Mogal appearing at SI. No.

12 in the Table appended to the

Commission's

order No. 76/MT-LA/99 dated 9th October, 2000

shall be deemed to have been omitted from the

said order with elfect from 18th June, 2001.

[No. 76/MT-LA/99]

By Order,

C. R. BRAHMAM, Secy

P. 3

ORDER

New Delhi, the 7th August, 2001

O.N. 115.-—Whereas, the Election Commission is satisfied that-the contesting candidates specified in column

(3) of the Table below of the General Election to the House of the People, 1999 held from the Constituency specified

in column (2) against his/her name has failed to lodge an account of his/her election expenses as shown in column

(4) of the said Table, as required by the Representation of the People Act, 1951 and the Rules made thcicundeis.

And whereas, the said candidates have not furnished any reason or explanation for the said failure even after

due notice and the Election Comnr'ssion is satisfied that he/she has no good reason or justification for the said

failui e.

Now, therefore, in pursuance of Section 10A of the said Act, the ElecLion Commission lieieby declares the

persons specified in column (3) of the Table below to be disqualified for being chosen as and foi being, a member

of cither House of the Parliament or the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of States (or a period of 3

years from the date of this order.

TABLE

SI.

No. & Name of the

Parliamentary Constituenc

. ) ~

~'~(2)""

13-Vijayawada

-do-

Name of the contesting candidates

(3)

Shri Sudh;ikarEi Reddy Lakkireddy,

2/58/4, Market Street,

Jammalamadugu, Cuddapah District.

Shri Parasa Yesu Ratnam,

36-8-36, Nehru Nagar, Vijayawada,

Shri Rajanala Gopikrishna,

9-65-46, Sykamvari Veedhi,

Kothapeta, Vijayawada,

Shri Rama Mohana Rao Yalamanchili,

40-9-98, Saiiiagar, Vijayawada.

Shri Shivarathri Ealaiah,

Sannur Village, Rayaparthy (M),

Warangal Dist.

Reason for disqualification

(4)

Failed to lodge the account of

election expenses at all;

-do-

-dr-

-do-

[No. 76/AP-HP/99]

By Order,

BABU RAM, Secy.

• 1>5

ORDER

New Delhi, the 7th August, 2001

O.N. 116.—Whereas, the Election Commission is satisfied that the contesting candidates specified in column

(3) of the Table below of the General Election to the House of the People, 1998 held from the Constituency speci-

fied in column (2) against his/her name has failed to Judge an account of his/her election expenses as shown m col urn

(4) of the said Table, as required by the Representation of the People Act, 1951 and the Rules made thereunder: n

And whereas, the said candidates have not furnished any reason or explanation for the said failure even aftea

due notice and the Election Commission is satisfied that he/she has no good reason or justification for the said

failure;

Now, therefore, in pursuance of Section 10A of the said Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the

persons specified in column (3) of the Table below to be disqualified for being chosen as and for being, a member

of either House of the Parliament or the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of States for a period of 3 years

from the date of this order.

TABLE

SI.

No.

(1)

',2.

No. & Name of the

Parliamentary Constituent

(2)

16-Bapatla

18-Ongole

3I-Secunderabad

-do-

Name of the Contesting candidates

Shri Chebrolu Yesupardha,

S/o Pakccraiah Professor,

Andhra Christian Theological Colhige,

Gandhinagar, Hyderabad-80.

Shri Madhavarapu Nagendra,

KakoUuvaripalli, Varikuntapadu Mandal,

Nellore Distt,, Andhra Pradesh.

Slid Ganta Satyanarayana Reddy,

H.No. 3-3-160, Kutbiguda, Hyderabad.

Shri K.S. Ganesh Rao,

H.No. 6-3-193/1, Jainagar Colony,

New Bhoiguda, Sccunderabad-500380.

Shri Thummala Praful Rum Reddy,

H.No. 1-4-879/91/B, Gandhinagar,

Bank Colony, Hyderabad-80.

Shri A. Manoj Kumar,

H.No. 6-1-132/71, Opp. Water Tank,

Padmaraonagar, Secunderabad-500061.

Shri Slceva Galleli,

H.No. 5-14-58, Laxminagar,

Moula Ali, Hyderabad-500040.

Reason for disqualification

(4)

Failed to lodge the account of

election expenses at all.

-do-

[No. 76/AP-HP/98]

By Order,

BABU RAM, Secy.

:i?8

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2001/BHADRA 17, 1923

[PART II—SEC. 3(iii)]

ORDER

New Delhi, the 7th August, 2001

O.M. 117.-Whereas, the Election Commission is satisfied that the contesting candidates specified in column

(3) of the Table below of the General Election to the Andhrn Pradesh Legislative Assembly, 1999, held from, the

Constituency specified in column (2) against his/her name has failed to lodge an account of hip/her election expenses

as shown in column (4) of the said Table, as required by the Representation of the People Act, 1951 and the Rules

made thereunder :

And whereas, the said candidates have not furnished any reason or explanation for the said failure even after

due noticc and the Election Commission is satisfied that he/she has no good reason or justification for Ihe said fai-

lure ;

Now, therefore, in pursuance of Section 10A of the said Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the

persons specified in column (3) of the Table below to be disqualified for being chosen as and. for being, a member

of cither House of the Parliament or the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of States for a period of 3 years

from the date of this order.

TABLE

SI.

No.

No. & Name of the

Assembly Constituency

(2)

80—Mylavaram

-do-

85 — Gudivada

-do-

Name of the Contesting Candidates

(3)

Shri Manda Ravi Kumar,

H.No. 6.31/3, VTPS(Post)

Ibrahimpatnam (V) & (M),

Andhra Pradesh.

Shri Y. Murali Krishna Naidu.

D. No. 1.1.5.25/B, •

Jbrahimpatnam (V) & (M),

Andhra Pradesh.

Smt. Prathiputi Vandanam,

D. No. 8.122, Velvadam(V),

Mylavaram (Ml

Andhra Pradesh.

Shri Gopala Krishna Murthy Mekala,

Door, No. 5/147-1,

Ashok Nagar, Vijayawada,

Andhra Pradesh.

Shri Divi Pooma Chandra Rao,

Door No. 13/133,

Patimeeda, Gudivada,

Andhra Pradesh.

Shri Natjendra Rao Nandipu,

K anchertavanlpura m,

Pumarru Mandal,

, Andhra Pradesh.

Shri Baskfira Rao Puvvada,

Door. No. 3/71-B-2,

Main Road Lingavaram,

Gudivr-da Mandal,

Andhra Pradesh.

Reason for Disqualification

(4)

Failed to lodge the account of

election expenses at all.

-do-

-do~

-do-

Failed to lod.ee Ihe account of

election expenses in the manner

required by law.

329

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

J9.

85—-Gudivada

) 52—Rayachcty

153—Lakkireddipalli

156- Mydukur

-do-

158 —J.im ma laraadug u

159—K amalapur am

-do-

160—Pulivcndla

-4o-

-dp-

322-GajW) (SO

Shri Vallabhancni Ravi Sankar,

Door. No. 13/144-B,

Patlmeeda, Gudivada,

(Andhra Pradesh).

Shri Ramaiah Abbavaram,

D. No. $2/43,

Abbavuramvandla PaJle,

H/O Rayachcty, '

Andhra Pradesh.

Shri K, Gangi Reddy,

42/43, Bosc Nagar,

Rayachoty,

Andhra Pradesh.

Shri Jacobu Peddulapalle,

Malagudipadu (V),

Diguvanelatur (P\

B. Mattam M?ndal,

Andhra Pradesh.

Shri Veakata Subba Reddy Redyam,

D\impalagattu (V),

Khajipet Mandal,

Andhra Pradesh.

Shri Bellala Chinna Liikshmnaiah,

7/30, Kota Street,

Jarnmalamadugu,

Andhra Pradesh.

Shri Badulla Sab Badamsagari,

Nidujuwi (V), Ycnaguntla,

Pendlimarri Mandul,

Andhra Pradesh.

Shri Gaadluru Narayana Reddy,

2/237, Yerraguntla Mandal,

Andhra Pradesh.

Shri Pandillapallc Adilakshumma,

Nandipalle (v),

ICathajur (PO),

Vempalle Mandal,

Andhra Pradesh.

Shri Peddamallu Krishnareddy,

Peddakudala (V & P),

Lingala Mandal,

Andhra Pradesh.

SJiri Bhpskar Reddy NaUagari,

Door]Ko. 1/2J32,

Nagarigutta, Pulivcndla,

Andhra Pradesh.

§mt. Afljara Vathi Dasari,

H. No. 2-12, Svigatam (V),

Gajwe) Mandal,

Mqdak District^

JCA-P.)

Failed to lodge the account of

election expenses at all.

-do-

-do-

-do-

2669 GI/2001—2

330

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2001/BHADRA 17, 1923

[PART II— SEC. 3(iii)]

20.

21.

22.

23.

270 —Ha namkonda

-do-

-dc-

-do-

Shri Padidelu Thinipath;iiah,

H. No. 1-58, Konuitipally,

Mandal : Hasanparthy,

Warangal Dist.

And lira Pradesh.

Shri Nellutla Ramchandor Rao,

II. No. 1-7-149, Revenue Colony,

Subedari

Hanamkonda, Warangal.

Andhra Pradesh.

Shri Balaboina Upender,

H. No. 2-8-111, Waddepalli,

Hanamkonda Warangal Disirici,

Aridhru Pradesh.

Sliri Rayaburapu Rajashckhai¹.

H. No. 9-1-174,

Girmajipet, Warangul,

Andhra Pradesh.

Failed to lodge the account of

election expenses at all.

-do-

[No. 76/AP-LA/99J

By Ord.r,

BABU RAM, Secy,

4. ^r%

*CT«T

l 5r ufaft-r " 13. i .v-f^T^qT

^ V

faWFT

5fkfe "nNT, ^ ^ m Tf^T,^^ HTfa'FT%

[iT.

434/"T^rR--^fT . T . / 2 0 0 l ( 2 ) ]

New Delhi, the 27th August 2001

0. N. 118.—In e\e cise oT the powers

COJI-

ferred by Sub-^cc ion (I) of Section

22 of the

Representation of ;lie People Act, 1951 (43 of

1951), the El ;c aon ConiiTisMon

ludij.

tonsullation

wiih

ilie

Government

Punjab

hereby makes the¹ following funlier

amwidmcnls

in iis noiifi.-auon No.

434/PB-HP/98(2),

da'u-d

12ih January, 1998, namely :

1. For the existing entry

"Additional

Deputy

Commissioner

(Dev.),

Hoshiaipur"^j^ apporring

in column 2 of the (able appended to the said

notification

against

the

entry

"6. Rei urging

Officer

for 6-Hoshiarpur

Parliamentary

consti-

tuency" in column 1 thereof, tho WCKU:

"Assistant

Commissioner (Grievances), Hoshiarpur"

shall lie

su bstituted :

33!

2. For the existing entry

''Assistant Commi-

ssioner

(Grievances),

Faridkot"

appearing

columa 2 of the table appended to

the said

notification

against

the

entry

4t12. Returning

Officer for 11-faridkot Parliamentary Constituency"

in column V thereof,

the words,

"Executive

Magistrate, Faridkot" shall be substituted ;

• 3. For the existing entry "Additional Deputy Com-

missioner (Dev.) Faridkoi" appearing in column 2 of

the table appended to the said notification against

the entry "12. Returning Officer for

12-Faridkot

Parliamentary Constituency" in column ! thereof,

the words, "Sub Divisional Magistrate, Jaito" shall

be substituted; and

4. For the ex'sting entry "Secretary, Regional

Transport

Authority, Ferozepur" appeering in

column 2 of the table appended

to the said

notification

against the entry

"13. Returning

Officer for

13-Ferozepur Parliamentary Consti-

tuency" in column 1 thereof, the words, "District

Transport Officer,

Moga" shall be substituted.

[No. 434/PB-HP/20O1 (2)]

By Order,

K. R. PRASAD, Secy.

CORRIGENDUM

.New Delhi, the 29th August, 2001

O.-N. 119.—\n Commission's notification No.

76/HN-LA/2OOO (3), dated 9th July, 2001, -the

entry appearing at column

of SI.- No.' 26

against 89-Ateli assembly constituency shall be

read as "Sh. Om Parkash, Vill Akoli,

P.O.

Bhungarka,

Tehsil Narnaul,

Distt.

Mahender-

garh, Haryana".

"• " [No. 76/HN-LA/2000 (3)]

By Order, '

PRASAD,

Secy.

New Delhi, the 28th August, 2001

O. N. 120.—In pursuance of Section 106 of

the Representation of the People Act, 1951

(43 of 1951), the Election Commission of India

hereby

publishes the order of the High Court

of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh daxed

24th July, 2001 in Election Petition No. 1 of 2001

filed by Shri Kanwal Singh Bedharak • calling

in question the election of Rao Man Singh as ?

Member of Council of States from the State of

Haryana.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB

AND

HARYANA

CHANDIGARH

CIVIL

ORIGINAL

SIDE

ELECTION PETITION NO. 1 of 2001

Kanwa]

Singh

Bedharak

Patwari President

National Pandav Da! Party registered vide No.

56/89 Serial No. 169 as., per

Notification Chief

Election Commission . of India dated* 23-10-1989

and April 1991 Serial No. 206 of resident and

Voter of Village Naya Bans Had bast No. 131

Tehsil Ganaur Distt. Sonepat.

Petitioner

Versus

- Rao Ma%. Singh. Member of Rajya Sab'aa,

Indian^ Parliament

New Delhi.

§g!\ .. ..Respondent

Petition under Sections 80 and 81 read with

Section 5100 of the'Representation of People Act.

1951 praying that keeping in view tiu facts aid

circumstances

mentioned

the

petition, . the

Tvwsfsnf p^titior¹ may kircl!^v be allowed and she

.byerelsction.-qf,the^_ returned/ candidate Rao

Man

Singh may kif»o1v be decWvr) void in the interest

of justice.

332

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2001/BHADRA 17, 1923

[PART II—SEC. 3(iii)3

Dated

tl#

24tti

July, 2001

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. C. KATHUR1A

Mr. Kanwal Singh Bedharak,

Petitioner,

person.

Election Petition No. I of 2001

Kanwal

Singh Bedharak

V. Rao

Man \Singh.

ORDER

R. C .

KATHUR1A, J.

Bye-election

for

one

scat of

Rajya

Sabha,

Parliament of India, was notified by the Election

Commission of India to be held on June 11, 2001.

Petitioner Kanwal Singh Bedharak, claiming himself

to be President

of National Pandav Dal Party

registered vide No. 56/89 (Serial No. 169) as per

Notification

dated October 23, 1989, issued by

the Chief Election Commissioner of India, and

resident and Voter of Village Naya Bans Hadbast

No. 131, Tehsil Gananr, District Sonopat, filed his

nomination

for

the

said

seat.

The

Assistant

Returning Officer

rejected

his

nomination

June 2, 2001 on the ground that the nomination

papers were not duty proposed by Members of

Haryana Vidhan Sabha and also because he had

not deposited the requisite security.

The said Re-

turning Officer declared Rao Man Singh, respondent,

as elected for the said seat. Challenge to the electio n

of the

respondent has been made by the petitioner

in this petition primarily on the ground that his no-

mination papers were wrongly rejected by the Assis-

tant Returning Officer. His other stand is that Daryao

Singh, brother of the petitioner, was in the custody

of Sube Sinflh at that time and for that reason said

Daryao Singh could not come and file his nomination

papers and, as such, the same were presented by the

petitioner. It is stated by the petitioner that because

of these circumstances, secunty deposit could not

be made and his name could not be got proposed from

the Members of Haryana Vidhan Sabha.

On secrutiny of the potition, it had been found

by the Registry that the petitioner had not deposited

security for costs of Rs. 2,000/-in terms of the pro.

visions of Sections 117 of the Representation of the

People Act, 1951 (hcreinaftej referred to as the Act)

read with Rule 7 of Chapter 4, Volume 5 of the Rules

& Orders of Punjab

& Haryana High Court. Other

defects have also been noticed by the Registry, but

they neod npt bo adverted to for the

purpose of

prosent controversy because deposit of Rs. 2,000/-

as security for costs is a condition precedent which

was required to be fulfilled by the petitioner at the

time of filling the present petition.

*P3 *The

petitioner, who argued jn person before

me, rend«eed the only explanation that as his brother

Daryao Singh was in confinement, the necessary de-

posit of Rs. 2,000/- as security for costs could not be

made by him. This can hardly be accepted as a valid

ground for non-compliance of the

porvisions of

Section 117 of the Act. It expressly lays down that

at the time of presenting an election petition, the pe-

titioner sha)l deposit in the High Court in accordance

with the Rules of the High Court a sum of two thousand

rupees as security for the costs of the petition.

Hav-

ing not complied with the above requirement, there

is no alternative for me but to dismiss this petition.

Consequently, this petition fails and is dismissed

in limine.

RC.

KATHURIA, Judge

July

24, 2001

[No. M2/CS-HR/1/2001]

By Order,

SHARAN PAL SINGH, Secy.

Printed by the Mtmainer, Govt. at India tiem, Ufa Koai, fin* DeBii4JM>64

Mid Published by the CortroOar of PubllcJUtom, Ddbi-IUXB*. 3901