⁄UÁ¡S≈˛UË ‚¢¯ «UË¯ ∞‹¯ (∞Ÿ) Æy/ÆÆÆ|/wÆÆxóÆz

REGD. NO. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05

¬˝ÊÁœ∑§Ê⁄U ‚ ¬˝∑§ÊÁ‡ÊÃ

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

‚ÊåÃÊÁ„U∑§

WEEKLY

la- 6]

ubZ fnYyh, tuojh 30—iQjojh 5] 2011] 'kfuokj@ek?k 10—ek?k 16] 1932

No. 6]

NEW DELHI, JANUARY 30—FEBRUARY 5, 2011, SATURDAY/MAGHA 10—MAGHA 16, 1932

ß‚ ÷Êª ◊¥ ÁèÊãŸ ¬Îc∆U ‚¢ÅÿÊ ŒË ¡ÊÃË „ÒU Á¡‚‚ Á∑§ ÿ„U ¬ÎÕ∑§ ‚¢∑§‹Ÿ ∑§ M§¬ ◊¥ ⁄UπÊ ¡Ê ‚∑§

Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

÷Êª IIóπá«U xó©U¬-πá«U (ii)

PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)

÷Ê⁄UÃ ‚⁄U∑§Ê⁄U ∑§ ◊¢òÊÊ‹ÿÊ¥ (⁄UˇÊÊ ◊¢òÊÊ‹ÿ ∑§Ê ¿UÊ«∏U∑§⁄U) mÊ⁄UÊ ¡Ê⁄UË Á∑§∞ ª∞ ‚Ê¢ÁﬂÁœ∑§ •ÊŒ‡Ê •ÊÒ⁄U •Áœ‚ÍøŸÊ∞¢

Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India

(Other than the Ministry of Defence)

x`g ea=kky;

ubZ fnYyh] 28 tuojh] 2011

dk- vk- 352-—jk"Vªifr] dsUnzh; flfoy lsok (oxhZdj.k] fu;a=k.k vkSj vihy) fu;e] 1965 ds fu;e 9 ds mifu;e (2)] fu;e

12 ds mifu;e (2) ds [kaM ([k) vkSj fu;e 24 ds mifu;e (1) ds }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, Hkkjr ljdkj ds x`g ea=kky;

dh dk-vk- la- 3386 rkjh[k 27 flrEcj] 2002 dh vf/lwpuk] ftls Hkkjr ds jkti=k Hkkx&2] [k.M&3] mi[k.M (2) esa rkjh[k

26 vDrwcj] 2002 esa izdkf'kr fd;k x;k Fkk] fuEufyf[kr la'kks/u djrh gSa] vFkkZr~ %µ

mDr vf/lwpuk dh vuqlwph esa] Hkkx&II vkSj Hkkx&III ds LFkku ij fuEufyf[kr dks lfEefyr fd;k tk,] vFkkZr~ %µ

“Hkkx&II

lk/kj.k dsUnzh; lsok lewg ^x*

inksa dk o.kZu

fu;qfDr izkf/dkjh

'kkfLr;ka vf/jksfir djus ds fy, l{ke

vihy izkf/dkjh

izkf/dkjh vkSj os 'kkfLr;ka ftUgsa og

vf/jksfir dj ldsxk (fu;e 11 dh

en la[;kad ds izfr funsZ'k ls)

izkf/dkjh

'kkfLr;ka

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

x`g ea=kky;] vklwpuk C;wjks

lHkh lewg ^x* in

264 GI/2011

(951)

952

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(i) vklwpuk C;wjks ds

lgk;d funs'kd (LFkkiu)

lgk;d funs'kd ;k

lHkh

la;qDr funs'kd@mi funs'kd

eq[;ky; esa

la;qDr mi funs'kd

(LFkkiu)

;k vij mi funs'kd

(LFkkiu)

(ii) leuq"kaxh vklwpuk C;wjks

lgk;d funs'kd (LFkkiu)

lgk;d funs'kd ;k

lHkh

la;qDr funs'kd@mi funs'kd

ds eq[;ky; esa

la;qDr mi funs'kd

(LFkkiu)] leuq"kaxh

;k vij mi funs'kd

vklwpuk C;wjks

(LFkkiu)

(iii) leuq"kaxh vklwpuk C;wjks

leuq"kaxh vklwpuk C;wjks ds

lgk;d funs'kd ;k

lHkh

la;qDr funs'kd@mi funs'kd

ds fu;a=k.k ds v/hu lgk;d

eq[;ky; ds lgk;d funs'kd@

la;qDr mi funs'kd

(LFkkiu)] leuq"kaxh

funs'kd ;k la;qDr mi funs'kd

lgk;d funs'kd (LFkkiu)

;k vij mi funs'kd

vklwpuk C;wjks

;k vij mi funs'kd ds dk;kZy;

(LFkkiu)

esa

(iv) eq[; vkizokl vf/dkjh] eq[; vkizokl vf/dkjh]

eq[; vkizokl

lHkh

la;qDr funs'kd@mi funs'kd

psUubZ ds dk;kZy; esa

psUubZ

vf/dkjh] psUubZ

(LFkkiu) leuq"kaxh vklwpuk

C;wjks] psUubZ

(v) fonsf'k;ksa fo"k;d izknsf'kd leuq"kaxh vklwpuk C;wjks ve`rlj]

lgk;d funs'kd ;k

lHkh

la;qDr funs'kd@mi funs'kd

jftLVªhdj.k vf/dkjh (ve`rlj]

caxykSj] fnYyh gSnjkckn]

la;qDr mi funs'kd

(LFkkiu) leuq"kaxh vklwpuk

caxykSj] fnYyh] gSnjkckn]

dksydkrk vkSj eqEcbZ eq[;ky;

;k vij mi funs'kd

C;wjks”]

dksydkrk vkSj eqEcbZ) ds

esa lgk;d funs'kd (LFkkiu)

(LFkkiu)

dk;kZy; esa

fonsf'k;ksa fo"k;d izknsf'kd (i) ls (iv)

jftLVªhdj.k vf/dkjh

¹iQk- la- 14@,lvks (lh)@2010 (1)@vC;wjks@ilZ- 1º

gjh'k pUnj] mi lfpo

fVIi.k&&ewy vf/lwpuk dk-vk- la[;kad 3386] rkjh[k 27 flrEcj] 2002 dks] Hkkjr ds jkti=k Hkkx&II] [k.M&3] mi[k.M (ii) esa

rkjh[k 26 vDrwcj] 2002 esa izdkf'kr fd;k x;k Fkk A

MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS

New Delhi, the 28th January, 2011

S.O. 352 .— In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-rule (2) of rule 9, clause (b) of sub-rule (2) of rule 12 and

sub-rule (1) of rule 24 of the Central Civil Services (classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965, the President hereby

makes the following amendments in the Notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Home Affairs published

in the Gazette Notification of India, Part-II, Section-3, Sub-section (ii), on 26th October, 2002, vide number S.O. 3386, dated

the 27th September, 2002, namely:—

In the Schedule to the said notification, for Part-II and Part-III, the following shall be substituted, namely:—

“Part-II

General Central Service Group ‘C’

Description of the Post

Appointing Authority

Authority competent to impose

Appellate Authority

penalties and penalties which it

may impose (with reference to

item numbers in rule 11)

Authority

Penalties

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

Ministry of Home Affairs Intelligence Bureau

All Group ‘C’ posts

(i) At the Headquarters

Assistant Director

All

Joint Director/Deputy

of Intelligence Bureau.

(Establishment)

or Joint Deputy

Director (Establishment)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

953

Director or Additional

Deputy Director

(Establishment).

(ii) At the Headquarters

Assistant Director

All

Joint Director/Deputy

of Subsidiary Intelligence

(Establishment)

or Joint Deputy

Director (Establishment)

Bureau.

Director or Additional

Subsidiary Intelligence

Deputy Director

Bureau

(Establishment).

(iii) In the office of the

Assistant Director/

Assistant Director

All

Joint Director/Deputy

Assistant Director or

Assistant Director

or Joint Deputy

Director (Establishment)

Joint Deputy Director or

(Establishment) of SIB

Director or Additional

Subsidiary Intelligence

Additional Deputy Director

Headquarters.

Deputy Director

Bureau.

under the control of Subsi-

(Establishment).

diary Intelligence Bureau.

(iv) In the office of the

Chief Immigration Officer,

Chief Immigration

All

Joint Director/Deputy

Chief Immigration Officer,

Chennai.

Officer, Chennai.

Director (Establishment)

Chennai.

Subsidiary Intelligence

Bureau, Chennai

(v) In the office of the

Assistant Director

All

Joint Director/Deputy

Foreigners Regional

(Establishment) at the

or Joint Deputy

Director (Establishment)

Registration Officer (Amritsar, Headquarters of Subsidiary

Director or Additional

Subsidiary Intelligence

Bangalore, Delhi, Hyderabad, Intelligence Bureau Amritsar Deputy Director

Bureau”

Kolkata and Mumbai).

Bangalore, Delhi, Hyderabad, (Establishment ).

Kolkata and Mumbai,

Foreigners Regional

(i) to (iv)

Registration Officer.

[F. No. 14/SO (C)/2010 (1)/IB/Pers. I]

HARISH CHANDER, Dy. Secy.

Note : The principle notification was published in the Gazette of India, on the 26th October, 2002, in Part-II, Section-3, Sub-

section (ii), vide number S. O. 3386, dated the 27th September, 2002.

dk£ed] yksd f'kdk;r rFkk isa'ku ea=kky;

(dk£ed vkSj izf'k{k.k foHkkx)

ubZ fnYyh] 25 tuojh] 2011

dk- vk- 353-—dsanzh; ljdkj ,rn~}kjk vkradoknh rFkk foèoa'kdkjh fØ;kdyki (fuokj.k) vf/fu;e] 1987 (1987 dk

vf/fu;e la- 28) dh /kjk 13 dh mi&/kjk (1) ds ijUrqd ds varxZr iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, mDr vf/fu;e 9 ds varxZr

vtesj (jktLFkku) ds U;k;ky; esa laLFkkfir vkradoknh rFkk foèoa'kdkjh fØ;kdyki (fuokj.k) ukfer ekeys tks fd fnYyh fo'ks"k iqfyl

LFkkiuk }kjk laLFkkfir ekeyk la- vkjlh- 37 (,l)@93@ts-ih-vkj- (lhfj;y jsy ce CykLV ekeys 1993) ds lapkyu ds fy, ds-v- C;wjks

ds ofj"B yksd vfHk;kstd Jh vkj-ch- 'kekZ dks fo'ks"k yksd vfHk;kstd ds :i esa fu;qDr djrh gS A

¹la- 225@43@2010&, oh Mh&IIº

vkj- ds- xqIrk] voj lfpo

MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS

(Department of Personnel and Training)

New Delhi, the 25th January, 2011

S. O. 353.—In exercise of the powers conferred under the proviso to sub-section (1) of Section 13 of the Terrorist

and Disruptive Activities (Provention) Act, 1987 (Act No. 28 of 1987), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri R. B.

Sharma, Senior Public Prosecutor of Central Bureau of Investigation as Special Public Prosecutor for conducting prosecution

of case No. R. C. 37 (S)/93/JPR. (Serial Train Bomb Blasts Cases 1993) instituted by Delhi Special Police Establishment in

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

954

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

designated Terrorist and Distruption Activities (Prevention) cases Court at Ajmer (Rajasthan)

constituted under 9 of the said Act and other matters connected therewith or incidental thereto.

[No. 225/43/2010-AVD-II]

R. K. GUPTA, Under. Secy.

dk;kZy; vk;qDr] dsUæh; mRikn ,oa lhek 'kqYd

Hkksiky] 7 fnlEcj] 2010

ozQe la- 15@2010

dk- vk- 354-—Jh ,e- vkbZ- vthe] v/h{kd] lewg [k] dsUnzh; mRikn ,oa lhek 'kqYd] vk;qDrky; Hkksiky] fuorZu dh vk;q

izkIr djus ij] fnukad 30 uoacj] 2010 dks vijkg~u esa 'kkldh; lsok ls fuo`Ùk gq;s A

¹ iQk- la- II@(03)@08@2010&bZVh- 1º

vjfoUn ¯lg] vk;qDr

OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER, CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX

Bhopal, the 7th December, 2010

No. 15/2010

S. O. 354.—Shri M. I. Azim, Superintendent, Group ‘B’, Customs & Central Excise, Bhopal having attained the

age of superannuation, retired from Government service in the afternoon of 30th November, 2010.

[C. No. II (3)/08/2010- ET. I]

ARVIND SINGH, Commissioner

Hkksiky] 13 tuojh] 2011

ozQe la- 01@2011

dk- vk- 355-—Jh iapksyh yky oekZ] dj lgk;d] lewg x] dsUnzh; mRikn ,oa lhek 'kqYd] vk;qDrky; Hkksiky] fuorZu dh

vk;q izkIr djus ij] fnukad 31 fnlacj] 2010 dks vijkg~u esa 'kkldh; lsok ls fuo`Ùk gq;s A

¹ iQk- la- II@(03)@08@2010&bZVh- 1º

vjfoUn ¯lg] vk;qDr

Bhopal, the 13th January, 2011

No. 01/2011

S. O. 355.—Shri Pancholi Lal Verma, Tax Assistant, Group ‘C’, Customs & Central Excise, Bhopal having attained

the age of superannuation, retired from Government service in the afternoon of 31st December, 2010.

[C. No. II (3)/08/2010- ET. I]

ARVIND SINGH, Commissioner

foÙk ea=kky;

(jktLo foHkkx)

(dsUæh; izR;{k dj cksMZ)

ubZ fnYyh] 24 tuojh] 2011

dk- vk- 356-—loZlk/kj.k dh tkudkjh ds fy, ,rn~}kjk ;g vf/lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd dsUnz ljdkj }kjk vk;dj

fu;ekoyh] 1962 (mDr fu;ekoyh) ds fu;e 5x vkSj 5Ä ds lkFk ifBr vk;dj vf/fu;e] 1961 (mDr vf/fu;e) dh /kjk 35 dh

mi&/kjk (1) ds [kaM (ii) ds iz;kstukFkZ dj fu/kZj.k o"kZ 2011&2012 ls vkxs vkjksX;/ke Xykscy ,M~l fjlpZ iQkmaMs'ku] eqtÝiQj uxj

dks fuEufyf[kr 'krks± ds v/hu vkaf'kd :i ls vuqla/ku dk;Zdykiksa esa yxs ^vU; laLFkk* dh Js.kh esa vuqeksfnr fd;k x;k gS] vFkkZr~ %&

(i) vuqeksfnr laxBu dks iznÙk jkf'k dk mi;ksx oSKkfud vuqla/ku ds fy, fd;k tk,xk_

(ii) vuqeksfnr laxBu vius ladk; lnL;ksa vFkok vius ukekafdr Nk=kksa ds ekè;e ls oSKkfud vuqla/ku djsxk_

(iii) vuqeksfnr laxBu oSKkfud vuqla/ku ds fy, blds }kjk izkIr jkf'k ds laca/ esa vyx [kkrk cgh j[ksxk ftlesa vuqla/ku

djus ds fy, iz;qDr jkf'k n'kkZbZ xbZ gks] mDr vf/fu;e dh /kjk 288 dh mi&/kjk (2) ds Li"Vhdj.k esa ;Fkk ifjHkkf"kr fdlh ys[kkdkj

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

955

ls ,slh [kkrk&cgh dh ys[kk ijh{kk djk,xk vkSj mDr vf/fu;e dh /kjk 139 dh mi&/kjk (1) ds varxZr vk; fooj.kh izLrqr djus dh

fu;r frfFk rd ,sls ys[kkdkj }kjk fof/or lR;kfir ,oa gLrk{kfjr ys[kk ijh{kk fjiksVZ ekeys esa {ks=kkf/dkj j[kus okys vk;dj vk;qDr

vFkok vk;dj funs'kd dks izLrqr djsxk_

(iv) vuqeksfnr laxBu oSKkfud vuqla/ku ds fy, izkIr nku rFkk iz;qDr jkf'k dk vyx fooj.k j[ksxk vkSj mi;qZDr ys[kk ijh{kk

fjiksVZ ds lkFk ys[kk ijh{kd }kjk fof/or lR;kfir ,sls fooj.k dh izfr izLrqr djsxk A

2- dsanz ljdkj ;g vuqeksnu okil ys yxh ;fn vuqeksfnr laxBu %&

(d) iSjkxzkiQ 1 ds mi&iSjkxzkiQ (iii) esa mfYyf[kr ys[kk cgh ugha j[ksxk_ vFkok

([k) iSjkxzkiQ 1 ds mi&iSjkxzkiQ (iii) esa mfYyf[kr viuh ys[kk ijh{kk fjiksVZ izLrqr ugha djsxk_ vFkok

(x) iSjkxzkiQ 1 ds mi&iSjkxzkiQ (iv) esa mfYyf[kr oSKkfud vuqla/ku ds fy, izkIr nku ,oa iz;qDr /ujkf'k dk fooj.k izLrqr

ugha djsxk_ vFkok

(?k) viuk vuqla/ku dk;Z djuk can dj nsxk vFkok blds vuqla/ku dk;Z dks tk;t ugha ik;k tk,xk_ vFkok

(Ä) mDr fu;ekoyh ds fu;e 5x vkSj 5Ä ds lkFk ifBr mDr vf/fu;e dh /kjk 35 dh mi&/kjk (1) ds [kaM (ii) ds

izko/kuksa ds vuq:i ugha gksxk rFkk mudk ikyu ugha djsxk A

¹vf/lwpuk la- 06@2011@iQk- la-@203@40@2010&vk-d-fu-&IIº

vt; xks;y] funs'kd (vk- d- fu-&II)

MINISTRY OF FINANCE

(Department of Revenue)

(Central Board of Direct Taxes)

New Delhi, the 24th January, 2011

S. O. 356—It is hereby notified for general information that the organization Arogyadham Global Aids Research

Foundation, Muzaffarnagar has been approved by the Central Government for the purpose of clause (ii) of sub-section (1)

of Section 35 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (said Act), read with Rules 5C and 5E of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 (said Rules),

with effect from AY 2011-2012 onwards in the category of ‘Other Institution’, partly engaged in research activities subject

to the following conditions, namely :-

(i) The sums paid to the approved organization shall be utilized for scientific research;

(ii) The approved organization shall carry out scientific research through its faculty members or its enrolled

students;

(iii) The approved organization shall maintain separate books of accounts in respect of the sums received by it for

scientific research, reflect therein the amounts used for carrying out research, get such books audited by an

accountant as defined in the explanation to sub-section (2) of Section 288 of the said Act and furnish the

report of such audit duly signed and verified by such accountant to the Commissioner of Income-tax or the

Director of Income-tax having jurisdiction over the case, by the due date of furnishing the return of income

under sub-section (1) of Section 139 of the said Act;

(iv) The approved organization shall maintain a separate statement of donations received and amounts applied

for scientific research and a copy of such statement duly certified by the auditor shall accompany the report

of audit referred to above.

2. The Central Government shall withdraw the approval if the approved organization :-

(a) fails to maintain separate books of accounts referred to in sub-paragraph (iii) of paragraph 1; or

(b) fails to furnish its audit report referred to in sub-paragraph (iii) of paragrph 1; or

956

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

sub-paragraph (iv) of paragraph 1; or

(d) ceases to carry on its research activities or its research activities are not found to be genuine; or

(e) ceases to conform to and comply with the provisions of clause (ii) of sub-section (1) of Section 35 of the said

Act read with rules 5C and 5E of the said Rules.

[Notification No. 06/2011/F. No. 203/40/2010-ITA-II]

AJAY GOYAL, Director (ITA-II)

fons'k ea=kky;

(lhihoh izHkkx)

ubZ fnYyh] 17 tuojh] 2011

dk- vk- 357-—jktuf;d vkSj dksalyh; vkWfiQlj ('kiFk vkSj iQhl) ds vf/fu;e] 1948 dh /kjk 2 ds [kaM (d) ds vuqlj.k

esa] dsanz ljdkj ,rn~}kjk Jhefr jpuk [kUMwtk] vij Js.kh fyfid dks 17&1&2011 ls Hkkjr ds jktnwrkokl] iSfjl esa lgk;d dksalqyj

vf/dkjh ds drZO;ksa dk ikyu djus ds fy, izkf/Ñr djrh gS A

¹la- Vh&4330@1@2006º

vkj- ds- isfjufM;k] voj lfpo (dksalqyj)

MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS

(CPV Division)

New Delhi, the 17th January, 2011

S. O. 357. —In pursuance of the clause (a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular Officers (Oaths and

fees) Act, 1948 (41 of 1048), the Central Government hereby authorize Smt. Rachna Khanduja, UDC Embassy of India,

Paris to perform the duties of Assistant Consular Officer with effect from 17th January, 2011.

[No. T-4330/01/2006]

R. K. PERINDIA, Under Secy. (Consular)

LokLF; ,oa ifjokj dY;k.k ea=kky;

(LokLF; ,oa ifjokj dY;k.k foHkkx)

ubZ fnYyh] 8 uoEcj] 2010

dk-vk- 358-—Hkkjrh; fpfdRlk ifj"kn~ vf/fu;e] 1956 (1956 dk 102) dh /kjk 11 dh mi&/kjk (2) }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa

dk iz;ksx djrs gq, dsUnz ljdkj Hkkjrh; fpfdRlk ifj"kn~ ls ijke'kZ djds] vgZrk ukekoyh esa ifjorZu ds dkj.k mDr vf/fu;e dh izFke

vuqlwph esa fuEufyf[kr vkSj la'kks/u djrh gS uker%—

(d) ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk 'kh"kZd ¹blds ckn dkye (2) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº ds vUrxZr ^^Mk- ,uVhvkj LokLF; foKku

fo'ofo|ky;] fot;okMk** ds lkeus iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr :i ¹blds ckn dkye (3) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº 'kh"kZd ds varxZr vafre

izfof"V ,oa mlls lacaf/r izfof"V ds ckn fuEufyf[kr dks var£o"V fd;k tk,xk] uker %&

(2)

(3)

¶peZ] jfrt rFkk dq"B jksx foKku esa fMIyksek**

MhMhoh,y

(;g o"kZ twu] 2009 vFkok mlds ckn MDdu fpfdRlk foKku egkfo|ky;)]

fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa gSnjkckn esa izf'kf{kr Mk- ,u-Vh-vkj-

LokLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky;] fot;okMk }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr

fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

^^MkWDVj vkWiQ esfMflu (tujy esfMflu)**

,e Mh (tujy esfMflu)

(;g o"kZ twu] 2009 vFkok mlds ckn ^^ujk;.kk esfMdy dkyst] usYyksj

vka/z izns'k** esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa Mk- ,u-Vh-vkj-

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

957

LokLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky;] fot;okMk }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr

fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

^^MkWDVj vkWiQ esfMflu (,ukVkseh)**

,e Mh (,ukVkseh)

(;g o"kZ twu] 2009 vFkok mlds ckn ^^ujk;.kk esfMdy dkyst] usYyksj

vka/z izns'k** esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa Mk- ,uVhvkj

LokLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky;] fot;okMk }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr

fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

^^peZ] jfrt rFkk dq"B jksx foKku esa fMIyksek**

MhMhoh,y

(;g o"kZ uoEcj] 2009 vFkok mlds ckn ^^vywjh lhrkjke jktq ,dsMeh vkiQ

esfMdy lkblsat] byq:] vka/z izns'k** esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds

laca/ esa Mk- ,uVhvkj LokLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky;] fot;okMk }kjk LohÑr

fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

^^eftLVªkj vkiQ fp:jx, (tsfuVks ;wfjujh ltZjh)**

,e lh ,p (tsfuVks ;wfjujh ltZjh)

(;g o"kZ uoEcj] 1993 vFkok mlds ckn ^^xka/h fpfdRlk dkyst] gSnjkckn]

vka/z izns'k** esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa Mk- ,uVhvkj

LokLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky;] fot;okMk }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr

fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

([k) ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk 'kh"kZd ¹blds ckn dkye (2) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº ds vUrxZr ^^mLekfu;k fo'ofo|ky;]

gSnjkckn** ds izfr iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr :i ¹blds ckn dkye (3) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº 'kh"kZd ds varxZr vafre izfof"V ,oa mlls

lacaf/r izfof"V ds ckn fuEufyf[kr dks var£o"V fd;k tk,xk] uker%&

^^eftLVªkj vkiQ fp:jx, (tsfuVks ;qfjujh ltZjh)**

,e lh ,p (tsfuVks ;wfjujh ltZjh)

(;g o"kZ 1993 vFkok mlds ckn ^^xka/h fpfdRlk dkyst] gSnjkckn] vka/z

izns'k** esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa mLekfu;k fo'ofo|ky;]

gSnjkckn }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

(x) ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk 'kh"kZd ¹blds ckn dkye (2) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº ds vUrxZr ^^vka/z izns'k LokLF; foKku

fo'ofo|ky;] fot;okMk** ds lkeus iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr :i ¹blds ckn dkye (3) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº 'kh"kZd ds varxZr vafre

izfof"V ,oa mlls lacaf/r izfof"V ds ckn fuEufyf[kr dks var£o"V fd;k tk,xk] uker%&

^^eftLVªkj vkiQ fp:jx, (tsfuVks ;qfjujh ltZjh)**

,e lh ,p (tsfuVks ;wfjujh ltZjh)

(;g o"kZ 1993 vFkok mlds ckn ^^xka/h fpfdRlk dkyst] gSnjkckn] vka/z

izns'k** esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa vka/z izns'k LokLF;

foKku fo'ofo|ky;] fot;okMk }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr

fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

(?k) ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk 'kh"kZd ¹blds ckn dkye (2) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº ds vUrxZr ^^iVuk fo'ofo|ky;** ds

lkeus iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr :i ¹blds ckn dkye (3) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº 'kh"kZd ds varxZr vafre izfof"V ,oa mlls lacaf/r izfof"V

ds ckn fuEufyf[kr dks var£o"V fd;k tk,xk] uker%&

^^MkDVj vkiQ esfMflu (iQksjsafld esfMflu)**

,eMh (iQksjsafld esfMflu)

(;g o"kZ 1967 vFkok mlds ckn ^^iVuk fpfdRlk egkfo|ky;] iVuk** esa

izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa iVuk fo'ofo|ky; }kjk LohÑr

fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

(2)

(3)

958

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(Ä) ekU;rk izkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk 'kh"kZd ¹blds ckn dkye (2) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº ds vUrxZr ^^ch- ,u- eaMy fo'ofo|ky;]

fcgkj ** ds lkeus iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr :i ¹blds ckn dkye (3) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº 'kh"kZd ds varxZr vafre izfof"V ,oa mlls

lacaf/r izfof"V ds ckn fuEufyf[kr dks var£o"V fd;k tk,xk] uker%&

^^fMIyksek bu vkFkksZifMDl**

Mh- vkFkksZ

(;g o"kZ vxLr] 2009 vFkok mlds ckn ^^ekrk xqtjh esfMdy dkWyst]

fd'kuxat] fcgkj** esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa ch ,u

eaMy fo'ofo|ky;] fcgkj }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk

vgZrk gksxh) A

(p) ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk 'kh"kZd ¹blds ckn dkye (2) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº ds vUrxZr ^^ia- jfo 'kadj 'kqDyk

fo'ofo|ky;] eè; izns'k ** ds lkeus iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr :i ¹blds ckn dkye (3) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº 'kh"kZd ds varxZr vafre

izfof"V ,oa mlls lacaf/r izfof"V ds ckn fuEufyf[kr dks var£o"V fd;k tk,xk] uker%&

^^fMIyksek bu ySfjuxksykWth ,aM vksVksykWth**

Mh- ,y vks

(;g o"kZ vxLr] 1981 vFkok mlds ckn ^^ts-,u-,e- esfMdy dkWyst]

jk;iqj] eè; izns'k** esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa ia- jfo

'kadj 'kqDyk fo'ofo|ky;] eè; izns'k }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr

fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

(N) ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk 'kh"kZd ¹blds ckn dkye (2) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº ds vUrxZr ^^xqtjkr fo'ofo|ky; ds lkeus

iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr :i ¹blds ckn dkye (3) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº 'kh"kZd ds varxZr vafre izfof"V ,oa mlls lacaf/r izfof"V ds ckn

fuEufyf[kr dks var£o"V fd;k tk,xk] uker%&

^^MkWDVj vkWiQ esfMflu (iQksjsafld esfMflu)**

,e Mh (iQksjsafld esfMflu)

(;g o"kZ 1985 esa vFkok mlds ckn Jherh ,u ,p ,y E;qfufliy esfMdy

dkWyst] vgenkckn esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa xqtjkr

fo'ofo|ky; }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

(t) ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk 'kh"kZd ¹blds ckn dkye (2) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº ds varxZr ^^ljnkj iVsy fo'ofo|ky;

xqtjkr** ds lkeus iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr :i ¹blds ckn dkye (3) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº 'kh"kZd ds varxZr vafre izfof"V ,oa mlls

lacaf/r izfof"V ds ckn fuEufyf[kr dks var£o"V fd;k tk,xk] uker%&

^^MkDVj vkiQ esfMflu (ck;ksdsesLVªh)**

,e Mh (ck;ksdsesLVªh)

(;g ebZ] 2009 esa vFkok mlds ckn izeq[k Lokeh esfMdy dkWyst] djkelkM]

xqtjkr esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa ljnkj iVsy fo'ofo|ky;]

xqtjkr }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

(>) ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk 'kh"kZd ¹blds ckn dkye (2) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº ds varxZr ^^ohj ukjen nf{k.k xqtjkr

fo'ofo|ky; xqtjkr** ds lkeus iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr :i ¹blds ckn dkye (3) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº 'kh"kZd ds varxZr vafre izfof"V

,oa mlls lacaf/r izfof"V ds ckn fuEufyf[kr dks var£o"V fd;k tk,xk] uker%&

^^ekLVj vkiQ ltZjh (izlwfr ,oa L=kh jksx)**

,e ,l (vkschth)

(;g ebZ] 2009 esa vFkok mlds ckn lwjr E;quhfliy baLVhV~;wV vkWiQ

esfMdy ,tqds'ku ,aM fjlpZ] lwjr esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds

laca/ esa ohj ukjen nf{k.k xqtjkr fo'ofo|ky;] xqtjkr }kjk LohÑr fd,

tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

^^ekLVj vkiQ ltZjh (vfLFk jksx foKku)**

,e ,l (vkFkksZ-)

(;g ebZ] 2009 esa vFkok mlds ckn lwjr E;quhfliy baLVhV~;wV vkWiQ esfMdy

,tqds'ku ,aM fjlpZ] lwjr esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa ohj

(2)

(3)

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

959

ukjen nf{k.k xqtjkr fo'ofo|ky;] xqtjkr }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij

ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

(×k) ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk 'kh"kZd ¹blds ckn dkye (2) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº ds varxZr ^^'ksj , d'ehj fpfdRlk foKku

fo'ofo|ky; (ekun fo'ofo|ky;)** ds lkeus iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr :i ¹blds ckn dkye (3) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº 'kh"kZd ds

varxZr vafre izfof"V ,oa mlls lacaf/r izfof"V ds ckn fuEufyf[kr dks var£o"V fd;k tk,xk] uker%&

^^MkWDVj vkWiQ esfMflu (,lih,e@dE;qfuVh esfMlu)**

,eMh (,lih,e@dE;qfuVh esfMlu)

(;g o"kZ vizSy] 2006 esa vFkok mlds ckn 'ksjs&,&d'ehj baLVhV~;wV vkWiQ

esfMdy lkbalst] Jhuxj] ts ,aM ds esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds

laca/ esa 'ksjs&,&d'ehj baLVhV~;wV vkWiQ esfMdy lkbalst (ekun fo'ofo|ky;)

}kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

^^MkWDVj vkWiQ esfMflu (dk£M;ksyksth)**

Mh,e (dk£M;ksyksth)

(;g o"kZ 1997 esa vFkok mlds ckn 'ksjs&,&d'ehj baLVhV~;wV vkiQ esfMdy

lkbalst] Jhuxj] ts ,aM ds esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa

'ksjs&,&d'ehj baLVhV~;wV vkWiQ esfMdy lkbalst (ekun fo'ofo|ky;) }kjk

LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

(r) ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk 'kh"kZd ¹blds ckn dkye (2) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº ds varxZr ^^tEew fo'ofo|ky;** ds lkeus

iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr :i ¹blds ckn dkye (3) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº 'kh"kZd ds varxZr vafre izfof"V ,oa mlls lacaf/r izfof"V ds ckn

fuEufyf[kr dks var£o"V fd;k tk,xk] uker%&

^^izlwfr ,oa L=kh jksx foKku esa fMIyksek**

Mhthvks

(;g o"kZ 1979 esa vFkok mlds ckn xouZesaV esfMdy dkyst] tEew esa

izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa tEew fo'ofo|ky; }kjk LohÑr

fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

(Fk) ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk 'kh"kZd ¹blds ckn dkye (2) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº ds varxZr ^^d'ehj fo'ofo|ky;** ds

lkeus iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr :i ¹blds ckn dkye (3) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº 'kh"kZd ds varxZr vafre izfof"V ,oa mlls lacaf/r izfof"V

ds ckn fuEufyf[kr dks var£o"V fd;k tk,xk] uker%&

^^ekLVj vkWiQ ltZjh (vksiFksyeksyksth)**

,e ,l (vksiFksyeksyksth)

(;g o"kZ 1989 esa vFkok mlds ckn xouZesaV esfMdy dkyst] tEew esa

izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa tEew fo'ofo|ky; }kjk LohÑr

fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

^^fMIyksek bu vkiFksyeksyksth**

Mhvks

(;g o"kZ 1987 esa vFkok mlds ckn xouZesaV esfMdy dkyst] tEew esa

izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa d'ehj fo'ofo|ky; }kjk LohÑr

fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

(n) ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk 'kh"kZd ¹blds ckn dkye (2) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº ds varxZr ^^jktho xka/h LokLF; foKku

fo'ofo|ky; caxykSj** ds lkeus iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr :i ¹blds ckn dkye (3) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº 'kh"kZd ds varxZr vafre izfof"V

,oa mlls lacaf/r izfof"V ds ckn fuEufyf[kr dks var£o"V fd;k tk,xk] uker%&

^^MkWDVj vkWiQ esfMflu (izlwfr jksx rFkk L=kh jksx foKku)**

,e Mh (vkschth)

(;g o"kZ ebZ 2009 esa vFkok mlds ckn ds ,l gsxMs esfMdy vdsMeh

eaxykSj esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa jktho xka/h LokLF;

(2)

(3)

960

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

foKku caxykSj fo'ofo|ky; }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk

vgZrk gksxh) A

(/) ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk 'kh"kZd ¹blds ckn dkye (2) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº ds varxZr ^^ds ,y bZ fo'ofo|ky;

dukZVd** ds lkeus iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr :i] ¹blds ckn dkye (3) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº 'kh"kZd ds varxZr vafre izfof"V ,oa mlls

lacaf/r izfof"V ds ckn fuEufyf[kr dks var£o"V fd;k tk,xk] uker%&

^^MkWDVj vkWiQ esfMflu (dk£M;ksyksth)**

Mh ,e (dk£M;ksyksth)

(;g o"kZ tqykbZ] 2009 esa vFkok mlds ckn ts ,y ,u esfMdy dkyst]

csyxkao] dukZVd esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa ds ,y bZ

fo'ofo|ky;] dukZVd }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk

vgZrk gksxh)A

(u) ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk 'kh"kZd ¹blds ckn dkye (2) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº ds varxZr ^^cEcbZ@eqEcbZ fo'ofo|ky;**

ds lkeus iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr :i ¹blds ckn dkye (3) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº 'kh"kZd ds varxZr vafre izfof"V ,oa mlls lacaf/r

izfof"V ds ckn fuEufyf[kr dks var£o"V fd;k tk,xk] uker%&

^^MkWDVj vkWiQ esfMflu (euksf'pfdRlk)**

,e Mh (euksf'pfdRlk)

(;g o"kZ 1973 esa vFkok mlds ckn xzkaV esfMdy dkyst esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk

jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa cEcbZ@eqEcbZ fo'ofo|ky; }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus

ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh)A

^^fMIyksek bu lkbdksyksftd esfMflu**

Mhih,e

(;g o"kZ 1966 esa vFkok mlds ckn xzkaV esfMdy dkyst esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk

jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa cEcbZ@eqEcbZ fo'ofo|ky; }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus

ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh)A

^^MkWDVj vkWiQ esfMflu (,UMksØhuksyksth)**

Mh ,e (,UMksØhuksyksth)

(;g o"kZ 1993 esa vFkok mlds ckn Vh-,u- esfMdy dkyst esa izf'kf{kr fd,

tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa cEcbZ@eqEcbZ fo'ofo|ky; }kjk LohÑr fd,

tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh)A

^^MkWDVj vkWiQ esfMflu (jsfM;ks Mk;xuksfll)**

,e Mh (jsfM;ks Mk;xuksfll)

(;g o"kZ 1995 esa vFkok mlds ckn eqEcbZ gkLihVy eqEcbZ esa izf'kf{kr fd,

tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa eqEcbZ fo'ofo|ky; }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij

ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh)A

(i) ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk 'kh"kZd ¹blds ckn dkye (2) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº ds varxZr ^^egkjk"Vª LokLF; foKku

fo'ofo|ky;] ukfld** ds lkeus iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr :i ¹blds ckn dkye (3) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº 'kh"kZd ds varxZr vafre izfof"V

,oa mlls lacaf/r izfof"V ds ckn fuEufyf[kr dks var£o"V fd;k tk,xk] uker%&

^^MkWDVj vkWiQ esfMflu (euksf'pfdRlk)**

,e Mh (euksf'pfdRlk)

(;g o"kZ 1973 esa vFkok mlds ckn xzkaV esfMdy dkyst] eqEcbZ esa izf'kf{kr

fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa egkjk"Vª LokLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky;]

ukfld }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh)A

^^fMIyksek bu lkbdksyksftdy esfMflu**

Mhih,e

(;g o"kZ 1966 esa vFkok mlds ckn xzkaV esfMdy dkyst] eqEcbZ esa izf'kf{kr

fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa egkjk"Vª LokLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky;]

ukfld }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh)A

(2)

(3)

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

961

^^MkWDVj vkWiQ esfMflu (jsfM;ks Mk;xuksfll)**

,e Mh (jsfM;ks Mk;xuksfll)

(;g o"kZ 1995 esa vFkok mlds ckEcs gkLihVy baLVhV~;wV vkiQ esfMdy lkbalst]

eqEcbZ esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa egkjk"Vª LokLF; foKku

fo'ofo|ky;] ukfld }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk

gksxh)A

(iQ) ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk 'kh"kZd ¹blds ckn dkye (2) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº ds varxZr ^^gkseh HkkHkk jk"Vªh; laLFkku

(ekun fo'ofo|ky;)] eqEcbZ** ds lkeus iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr :i ¹blds ckn dkye (3) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº 'kh"kZd ds varxZr

vafre izfof"V ,oa mlls lacaf/r izfof"V ds ckn fuEufyf[kr dks var£o"V fd;k tk,xk] uker%&

^^fMIyksek bu jsfM;s'ku esfMflu**

Mhvkj,e

(VkVk eseksfj;y lsaVj] eqEcbZ esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa

gkseh HkkHkk jk"Vªh; laLFkku (ekun fo'ofo|ky;)] eqEcbZ }kjk LohÑr fd,

tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh)A

fo'ofo|ky;] iq.ks** ds lkeus iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr :i ¹blds ckn dkye (3) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº 'kh"kZd ds varxZr vafre izfof"V

,oa mlls lacaf/r izfof"V ds ckn fuEufyf[kr dks var£o"V fd;k tk,xk] uker%&

^^fMIyksek bu ifCyd gsYFk**

Mhih,p

( ;g uoEcj] 2009 esa vFkok mlds ckn Mk- Mh- okbZ ikfVy esfMdy

dkyst] fiEijh] iq.ks esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa Mk- Mh-

okbZ ikfVy fo'ofo|ky;] iq.ks }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr

fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh)A

^^eftLVªkj vkiQ fp:jfx;s (U;wjks ltZjh)**

,e lh ,p (U;wjks ltZjh)

(;g vDrwcj] 2009 esa vFkok mlds ckn Mk- Mh-okbZ ikfVy esfMdy dkyst]

fiEijh] iq.ks esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa Mk- Mh-okbZ ikfVy

fo'ofo|ky;] iq.ks }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk

gksxh)A

(Hk) ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk 'kh"kZd ¹blds ckn dkye (2) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº ds varxZr ^^Mk- Mh-okbZ- ikfVy

fo'ofo|ky;] uoh eqEcbZ** ds lkeus iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr :i ¹blds ckn dkye (3) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº 'kh"kZd ds varxZr vafre

izfof"V ,oa mlls lacaf/r izfof"V ds ckn fuEufyf[kr dks var£o"V fd;k tk,xk] uker%&

^^MkDVj vkiQ esfMflu (jsfM;ks Mk;xuksfll)**

,e Mh (jsfM;ks Mk;xuksfll)

( ;g tqykbZ] 2009 esa vFkok mlds ckn Mk- Mh-okbZ- ikfVy esfMdy dkyst]

gkLihVy ,aM fjlpZ lsUVj] uoh eqEcbZ esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds

laca/ esa Mk- Mh-okbZ ikfVy fo'ofo|ky;] uoh eqEcbZ }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus

ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh)A

^^{k;jksx ,oa Nkrh jksx esa fMIyksek**

MhVhlhMh

(;g twu] 2009 esa vFkok mlds ckn Mk- Mh- okbZ- ikfVy esfMdy dkyst]

gkLihVy ,aM fjlpZ lsUVj] uoh eqEcbZ esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds

laca/ esa ineJh Mk- Mh-okbZ- ikfVy fo'ofo|ky;] uoh eqEcbZ }kjk LohÑr

fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh)A

(e) ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk 'kh"kZd ¹blds ckn dkye (2) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº ds varxZr ^^f'kokth fo'ofo|ky;¸ ds

lkeus iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr :i ¹blds ckn dkye (3) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº 'kh"kZd ds varxZr vafre izfof"V ,oa mlls lacaf/r izfof"V

ds ckn fuEufyf[kr dks var£o"V fd;k tk,xk] uker%&

(2)

(3)

962

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

^^MkDVj vkWiQ esfMflu (tujy esfMflu)**

,e Mh (tujy esfMflu)

(;g ebZ] 2008 esa vFkok mlds ckn Mk- Mh-okbZ ikfVy esfMdy dkyst]

dksYgkiqj esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa f'kokth fo'ofo|ky;

}kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rk izkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh)A

(;) ekU;rk izkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk 'kh"kZd ¹blds ckn dkye (2) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº ds varxZr ^^Mk- Mh-okbZ- ikfVy

fo'ofo|ky;] dksYgkiqj** ds lkeus iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr :i ¹blds ckn dkye (3) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº 'kh"kZd ds varxZr vafre

izfof"V ,oa mlls lacaf/r izfof"V ds ckn fuEufyf[kr dks var£o"V fd;k tk,xk] uker%&

^^MkWDVj vkWiQ esfMflu (tujy esfMflu)**

,e Mh (tujy esfMflu)

(;g ebZ] 2008 esa vFkok mlds ckn Mk- Mh-okbZ ikfVy esfMdy dkyst]

dksYgkiqj esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa Mk- Mh- okbZ ikfVy

fo'ofo|ky;] dksYgkiqj }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk

vgZrk gksxh)A

(j) ekU;rk izkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk 'kh"kZd ¹blds ckn dkye (2) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº ds varxZr ^^nÙkk es?ks vk;q£oKku laLFkku

fo'ofo|ky;] ukxiqj** ds lkeus iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr :i ¹blds ckn dkye (3) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº 'kh"kZd ds varxZr vafre izfof"V

,oa mlls lacaf/r izfof"V ds ckn fuEufyf[kr dks var£o"V fd;k tk,xk] uker%&

^^MkWDVj vkWiQ esfMflu (cky jksx)**

,e Mh (cky jksx)

(;g ebZ] 2009 esa vFkok mlds ckn ts-,u- esfMdy dkyst] Lokaxh] o/kZ esa

izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa nÙkk es?ks vk;q£oKku laLFkku

fo'ofo|ky;] ukxiqj }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk

gksxh)A

(y) ekU;rk izkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk 'kh"kZd ¹blds ckn dkye (2) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº ds varxZr ^^ikafMpsjh fo'ofo|ky;¸ ds

lkeus iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr :i ¹blds ckn dkye (3) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº 'kh"kZd ds varxZr vafre izfof"V ,oa mlls lacaf/r izfof"V

ds ckn fuEufyf[kr dks var£o"V fd;k tk,xk] uker%&

L=kh jksx ,oa izlwfr foKku esa fMIyksek

Mhthvks

(;g tqykbZ] 2009 esa vFkok mlds ckn egkRek xka/h esfMdy dkyst ,oa

vuqla/ku laLFkku] iqM~Mqpsjh esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa

ikafMpsjh fo'ofo|ky;] }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk

vgZrk gksxh) A

^^cky LokLF; esa fMIyksek**

Mhlh,p

(;g tqykbZ] 2009 esa vFkok mlds ckn egkRek xka/h esfMdy dkyst ,oa

vuqla/ku laLFkku] iqM~Mqpsjh esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa

ikafMpsjh fo'ofo|ky;] }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk

vgZrk gksxh)A

(o) ekU;rk izkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk 'kh"kZd ¹blds ckn dkye (2) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº ds varxZr ^^iatkc fo'ofo|ky;** ds

lkeus iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr :i ¹blds ckn dkye (3) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº 'kh"kZd ds varxZr vafre izfof"V ,oa mlls lacaf/r izfof"V

ds ckn fuEufyf[kr dks var£o"V fd;k tk,xk] uker%&

MkWDVj vkWiQ esfMflu (,lih,e@lkeqnkf;d fpfdRlk)

,eMh (,lih,e@lkeqnkf;d fpfdRlk)

(;g vDrwcj] 2006 esa vFkok mlds ckn ljdkjh esfMdy dkyst paMhx<+ esa

izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa iatkc fo'ofo|ky;] }kjk LohÑr

fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

(2)

(3)

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

963

^^MkWDVj vkWiQ esfMflu (iQkWjsfUld fpfdRlk)**

,eMh (iQkWjsfUld fpfdRlk)

(;g vizSy] 2006 esa vFkok mlds ckn ljdkjh esfMdy dkyst] paMhx<+ esa

izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa iatkc fo'ofo|ky;] }kjk LohÑr

fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

('k) ekU;rk izkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk 'kh"kZd ¹blds ckn dkye (2) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº ds varxZr ^^jktLFkku fo'ofo|ky;** ds

lkeus iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr :i ¹blds ckn dkye (3) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº 'kh"kZd ds varxZr vafre izfof"V ,oa mlls lacaf/r izfof"V

ds ckn fuEufyf[kr dks var£o"V fd;k tk,xk] uker%&

MkWDVj vkWiQ esfMflu@ekLVj vkWiQ ltZjh (izlwfr ,oa)

,eMh@,e ,l (izlwrh ,oa L=kh jksx)

L=kh jksx)

(;g o"kZ 1978 esa vFkok mlds ckn ts,y,u esfMdy dkyst] vtesj esa

izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa jktLFkku fo'ofo|ky;] }kjk

LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

^^laKkgj.k foKku esa fMIyksek**

Mh,

(;g o"kZ tqykbZ] 1968 esa vFkok mlds ckn ljnkj iVsy esfMdy dkyst]

chdkusj esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa jktLFkku fo'ofo|ky;]

}kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

("k) ekU;rk izkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk 'kh"kZd ¹blds ckn dkye (2) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº ds varxZr ^^jktLFkku LokLF; foKku

laLFkku] t;iqj** ds lkeus iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr :i ¹blds ckn dkye (3) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº 'kh"kZd ds varxZr vafre izfof"V ,oa

mlls lacaf/r izfof"V ds ckn fuEufyf[kr dks var£o"V fd;k tk,xk] uker%&

MkWDVj vkWiQ esfMflu@ekLVj vkWiQ ltZjh (izlwfr ,oa

,eMh@,e ,l (izlwrh ,oa L=kh jksx)

L=kh jksx)

(;g o"kZ 1978 esa vFkok mlds ckn ts,y,u esfMdy dkyst] vtesj esa

izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa jktLFkku fo'ofo|ky; }kjk

LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶laKkgj.k foKku esa fMIyksek¸

Mh,

(;g o"kZ tqykbZ] 1968 esa vFkok mlds ckn ljnkj iVsy esfMdy dkyst]

chdkusj esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa jktLFkku fo'ofo|ky;]

}kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

(g) ekU;rk izkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk 'kh"kZd ¹blds ckn dkye (2) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº ds varxZr ^^MkW- vkj,e,y vo/

fo'ofo|ky;] mÙkj izns'k** ds lkeus iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr :i ¹blds ckn dkye (3) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº 'kh"kZd ds varxZr vafre

izfof"V ,oa mlls lacaf/r izfof"V ds ckn fuEufyf[kr dks var£o"V fd;k tk,xk] uker%&

¶L=kh jksx ,oa izlwfr foKku esa fMIyksek¸

Mhthvks

(;g tuojh] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn bZjkl y[kuÅ esfMdy dkyst]

y[kuÅ esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa MkW- vkj,e,y

vo/ fo'ofo|ky;] mÙkj izns'k }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr

fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

^^{k; rFkk Nkrh jksx foKku esa fMIyksek**

MhVhlhMh

(;g fnlEcj] 2009 esa vFkok mlds ckn bZjkl y[kuÅ esfMdy dkyst]

y[kuÅ esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa MkW- vkj,e,y vo/

fo'ofo|ky;] mÙkj izns'k }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk

vgZrk gksxh) A

(2)

(3)

964

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

¶euksfpfdRlk esa fMIyksek¸

Mhih,e

(;g fnlEcj] 2009 esa vFkok mlds ckn bZjkl y[kuÅ esfMdy dkyst]

y[kuÅ esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa MkW- vkj,e,y vo/

fo'ofo|ky;] mÙkj izns'k }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk

vgZrk gksxh) A

^^cky LokLF; esa fMIyksek**

Mhlh,p

(;g fnlEcj] 2009 esa vFkok mlds ckn bZjkl y[kuÅ esfMdy dkyst]

y[kuÅ esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa MkW- vkj,e,y vo/

fo'ofo|ky;] mÙkj izns'k }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk

vgZrk gksxh) A

¶vksVksySfjuxksyksth esa fMIyksek**

Mh,yvks

(;g tuojh] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn bZjkl y[kuÅ esfMdy dkyst]

y[kuÅ esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa Mk- vkj,e,y vo/

fo'ofo|ky;] mÙkj izns'k }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk

vgZrk gksxh) A

(d d) ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk 'kh"kZd ¹blds ckn dkye (2) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº ds varxZr ^^dkyhdV fo'ofo|ky;]

dsjy** ds lkeus iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr :i ¹blds ckn dkye (3) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº 'kh"kZd ds varxZr vafre izfof"V ,oa mlls lacaf/r

izfof"V ds ckn fuEufyf[kr dks var£o"V fd;k tk,xk] uker%&

^^MkDVj vkWiQ esfMflu (jsfM;ksMk;xuksfll)**

,eMh (jsfM;ks Mk;xuksfll)

(;g vDrwcj] 1999 esa vFkok mlds ckn dkyhdV esfMdy dkyst] dkyhdV

dsjy esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa dkyhdV fo'o|ky;]

}kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

^^esfMdy jsfM;ks Mk;xuksfll**

Mh,evkjMh

(;g o"kZ 1984 esa vFkok mlds ckn dkyhdV esfMdy dkyst] dkyhdV

dsjy esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa dkyhdV fo'ofo|ky;]

}kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

^^eftLVªkj fp:jx, (U;wjks ltZjh)**

,e lh ,p (U;wjks ltZjh)

(;g o"kZ 1998 esa vFkok mlds ckn dkyhdV esfMdy dkyst] dkyhdV

dsjy esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa dkyhdV fo'ofo|ky;]

}kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

([k [k) ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk 'kh"kZd ¹blds ckn dkye (2) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº ds varxZr ^^enqjS fo'ofo|ky;** ds

lkeus iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr :i ¹blds ckn dkye (3) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº 'kh"kZd ds varxZr vafre izfof"V ,oa mlls lacaf/r izfof"V

ds ckn fuEufyf[kr dks var£o"V fd;k tk,xk] uker%&

^^MkDVj vkWiQ esfMflu (iQkjsfUld esfMflu)**

,eMh (iQkjsfUld esfMflu)

(;g o"kZ 1981 esa vFkok mlds ckn fr:usyosyh esfMdy dkyst] fr:usyosyh]

rfeyukMq esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa enqjS dkejkt

fo'ofo|ky;] }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk

gksxh)A

(x x) ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk 'kh"kZd ¹blds ckn dkye (2) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº ds varxZr ^^enqjS dkejkt fo'ofofo|ky;**

ds lkeus iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr :i ¹blds ckn dkye (3) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº 'kh"kZd ds varxZr vafre izfof"V ,oa mlls lacaf/r

izfof"V ds ckn fuEufyf[kr dks var£o"V fd;k tk,xk] uker%&

(2)

(3)

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

965

^^MkDVj vkWiQ esfMflu (iQkjsfUld esfMflu)

,eMh (iQkjsfUld esfMflu)

(;g o"kZ 1981 esa vFkok mlds ckn fr:usyosyh esfMdy dkyst] fr:usyosyh]

rfeyukMq esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa enqjS dkejkt

fo'ofo|ky;] }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk

gksxh)A

(?k ?k) ekU;rk izkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk 'kh"kZd (blds ckn dkye (2) ds :i esa fu£n"V) ds varxZr ^^enzkl fo'ofo|ky;** ds

lkeus iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr :i (blds ckn dkye (3) ds :i esa fu£n"V) 'kh"kZd ds varxZr vafre izfof"V ,oa mlls lacaf/r izfof"V

ds ckn fuEufyf[kr dks var£o"V fd;k tk,xk] uker%&

^^MkWDVj vkWiQ esfMflu (iQkjsfUld esfMflu)**

,eMh (iQkjsfUld esfMflu)

(;g o"kZ 1981 esa vFkok mlds ckn fr:usyosyh esfMdy dkyst] fr:usyosyh]

rfeyukMq esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa enzkl fo'ofo|ky;]

}kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh)A

(ÄÄ) ekU;rk izkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk 'kh"kZd (blds ckn dkye (2) ds :i esa fu£n"V) ds varxZr ^^fn rfeyukMq Mk- ,ethvkj

esfMdy fo'ofo|ky;** ds lkeus iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr :i (blds ckn dkye (3) ds :i esa fu£n"V) 'kh"kZd ds varxZr vafre

izfof"V ,oa mlls lacaf/r izfof"V ds ckn fuEufyf[kr dks var£o"V fd;k tk,xk] uker%&

^^MkWDVj vkWiQ esfMflu (iQkjsfUld esfMflu)¸

,eMh (iQkjsfUld esfMflu)

(;g o"kZ 1981 esa vFkok mlds ckn rfeyukMq esfMdy dkyst] fr:osyh]

esfMdy dkyst] fr:osyh rfeyukMq esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds

laca/ esa fn rfeyukMq MkW- ,ethvkj esfMdy fo'ofo|ky; psUubZ }kjk

LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh)A

Ñi;k lHkh uksV djsa fd

1- LukrdksÙkj ikB~;Øe esa iznku dh xbZ ekU;rk vf/dre 5 o"kZ dh vof/ ds fy, nh tk,xh vkSj blds i'pkr~ bldk uohdj.k djok;k

tkuk gksxk A

2- mi /kjk ([kaM) 4 esa ;Fkk visf{kr le; ij ekU;rk ds uohdj.k djok, tkus esa foiQy gksus ij LukrdksÙkj lacaf/r ikB~;Øeksa esa izos'k

jksd fn;k tk,xk A

¹la- ;w- 12012@161@2010&,ebZ (ih&II)º

vfurk f=kikBh] voj lfpo

MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE

(Department of Health and Family Welfare)

New Delhi, the 8th November, 2010

S.O. 358.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of the Section 11 of the Indian Medical Council

Act, 1956 (102 of 1956), the Central Government, after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby makes the following

further amendments in the First Schedule to the said Act, due to change of nomenclature of the qualification namely:—

In the said Schedule—

(a) against “Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences, Vijayawada ” under the heading ‘Recognised Medical Qualification’

[hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation for

Registration’ [ hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely :—

(2)

(3)

966

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(2)

(3)

“Diploma in Dermatology, Venerology & Leprosy”

DDVL

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted

by Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences, Vijayawada in

respect of students being trained at Deccan College, of Medi-

cal Sciences, Hyderabad on or after June, 2009.)

“Doctor of Medicine (General Medicine)”

MD (General Medicine)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted

by Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences, Vijayawada in

respect of students being trained at Narayana Medical

College, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh on or after June, 2009.)

“Doctor of Medicine (Anatomy)”

MD (Anatomy)

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted

by Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences, Vijayawada in

respect of students being trained at Narayana Medical

College, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh on or after June, 2009.)

“Diploma in Dermatology, Venerology & Leprosy”

DDVL

( This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted

by Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences, Vijayawada in

respect of students being trained at Alluri Sitarama Raju

Academy of Medical Sciences, Eluru, Andhra Pradesh on or

after November, 2009.)

“Magistrar of Chirurgiae (Genito Urinary Surgery)”

M. Ch (Genito Urinary Surgery)

( This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted

by Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences, Vijayawada in

respect of students being trained at Gandhi Medical College,

Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh on or after 1993.

(b) against “Osmania University, Hyderabad under the heading ‘Recognised Medical Qualification’ [ hereinafter

referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation for Registration’

[ hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely :—

“Magistrar of Chirurgiae (Genito Urinary Surgery)”

M. Ch (Genito Urinary Surgery)

( This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted

by Osmania University, Hyderabad in respect of the students

being trained at Gandhi Medical College, Hyderabad, Andhra

Pradesh on or after 1993.)

Qualification’ [ hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading

‘Abbreviation for Registration’ [ hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely :—

“Magistrar of Chirurgiae (Genito Urinary Surgery)”

M. Ch (Genito Urinary Surgery)

( This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted

by Andhra Pradesh University of Health Sciences, Vijayawada

in respect of the students being trained at Gandhi Medical

College, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh on or after 1993.)

(d) against “Patna University” under the heading ‘Recognised Medical Qualification’ [hereinafter referred to as column

(2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation for Registration’ [ hereinafter referred

to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely :—

“Doctor of Medicine (Forensic Medicine)”

MD (Forensic Medicine)

( This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

967

by Patna University, in respect of the students being trained at

Patna Medical College, Patna, on or after 1967.)

(e) against “B. N. Mandal University Bihar” under the heading ‘Recognised Medical Qualification’ [ hereinafter

referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation for Registration’

[ hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely :—

“Diploma in Orthopaedics”

D. Ortho.

( This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted

by B. N. Mandal University, Bihar in respect of the students

being trained at Mata Gujri Medical College, Kishanganj, Bihar

on or after August, 2009.)

(f) against “Pt. Ravi Shankar Shukla University, Madhya Pradesh” under the heading ‘Recognised Medical Qualification’

[ hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation

for Registration’ [ hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely :—

“Diploma in Laryngology & Otology”

DLO

( This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted

by Pt. Ravi Shankar Shukla University, Madhya Pradesh in

respect of the students being trained at Pt. J. N. M. Medical

College, Raipur, Madhya Pradesh on or after 1981.)

(g) against “Gujarat University” under the heading ‘Recognised Medical Qualification’ [ hereinafter referred to as

column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation for Registration’ [ hereinafter

referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely :—

“Doctor of Medicine (Forensic Medicine)”

MD (Forensic Medicine)

( This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted

by Gujarat University, in respect of the students being trained

at Smt. NHL Municipal Medical College, Ahmedabad, on or

after 1985.)

(h) against “Sardar Patel University Gujarat” under the heading ‘Recognised Medical Qualification’ [ hereinafter

referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation

for Registration’ [ hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely :—

“Doctor of Medicine (Biochemistry)”

MD (Biochemistry)

( This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted

by Sardar Patel University, Gujarat in respect of students being

trained at Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Gujarat

on or after May, 2009.)

(i) against “Veer Narmad South Gujarat University Gujarat” under the heading ‘Recognised Medical Qualification’

[ hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation

for Registration’ [ hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely :—

“Master of Surgery (Obstetrics & Gynaecology)”

MS (OBG)

( This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted

by Veer Narmad South Gujarat University, Gujarat in respect of

students being trained at Surat Municipal Institute of Medical

Education & Research, Surat, Gujarat on or after May, 2009.)

“Master of Surgery (Orthopaedics)”

MS (Ortho.)

( This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted

by Veer Narmad South Gujarat University, Gujarat in respect

of students being trained at Surat Municipal Institute of

Medical Education & Research, Surat, Gujarat on or after

May, 2009.)

(2)

(3)

968

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(j) against “Sher-I-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences (Deemed University)’’ under the heading ‘Recognised Medical

Qualification’ [ hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading

‘Abbreviation for Registration’ [ hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely :—

“Doctor of Medicine (SPM/Community Medicine)”

MD (SPM/Community Medicine).

( This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted

by Sher-I-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences (Deemed

University, in respect of students being trained at Sher-I-

Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, J & K on or

after April, 2006.)

“Doctor of Medicine (Cardiology)”

DM (Cardiology).

( This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted

by Sher-I-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences (Deemed

University, in respect of students being trained at

Sher-I-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, J & K

on or after April, 1997).

(k) against “Jammu University” under the heading ‘Recognised Medical Qualification’ [ hereinafter referred to as

column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation for Registration’ [ hereinafter

referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely :—

“Diploma in Obstetrics & Gynaecology”

DGO

( This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted

by Jammu University in respect of students being trained at

Govt. Medical College, Jammu, J & K on or after 1979).

(l) against “Kashmir University” under the heading ‘Recognised Medical Qualification’ [ hereinafter referred to as

column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation for Registration’ [ hereinafter

referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely :—

“Master of Surgery (Ophthalmology)”

MS (Ophthalmology).

( This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted

by Kashmir University in respect of students being trained at

Govt. Medical College, Srinagar, J & K on or after 1989).

“Diploma in (Ophthalmology)”

D O

( This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted

by Kashmir University in respect of students being trained at

Govt. Medical College, Srinagar, J & K on or after 1987).

(m) against “Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Bangalore” under the heading ‘Recognised Medical Qualification’

[ hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation

for Registration’ [ hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely :—

“Doctor of Medicine (Obstetrics & Gynaecology)”

MD (OBG).

( This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted

by Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Bangalore in

respect of students being trained at K. S. Hegde Medical

Aademy, Mangalore on or after May, 2009.)

(n) against “KLE University, Karnataka” under the heading ‘Recognised Medical Qualification’ [ hereinafter referred

to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation for Registration’

[ hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely :—

“Doctor of Medicine (Cardiology)”

D M (Cardiology).

( This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted

by KLE University, Karnataka in respect of students being

trained at J. L. N. Medical College, Belgaum, Karnataka on or

after July, 2009).

(2)

(3)

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

969

(o) against “Bombay/Mumbai University” under the heading ‘Recognised Medical Qualification’ [ hereinafter referred

to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation for Registration’

[ hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely :—

“Doctor of Medicine (Psychiatry)”

M D (Psychiatry)

( This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted

by Bombay/Mumbai University in respect of students being

trained at Grant Medical College, Mumbai, on or after July,

1973).

“Diploma in Psychological Medicine”

D P M

( This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted

by Bombay/Mumbai University in respect of students being

trained at Grant Medical College, Mumbai, on or

after 1966).

“Doctor of Medicine (Endocrinology)”

D M (Endocrinology)

( This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted

by Bombay/Mumbai University in respect of students being

trained at T. N. Medical College, Mumbai, on or after 1993).

“Doctor of Medicine ( Radio Diagnosis)”

M D ( Radio Diagnosis)

( This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted

by Mumbai University in respect of students being trained at

Bombay Hospital Institute of Medical Sciences, Mumbai on or

after 1995).

(p) against “Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, Nashik” under the heading ‘Recognised Medical Qualification’

[ hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation

for Registration’ [ hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely :—

“Doctor of Medicine (Psychiatry)”

M D (Psychiatry)

( This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted

by Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, Nashik in

respect of students being trained at Grant Medical College,

Mumbai, on or after 1973).

“Diploma in Psychological Medicine”

DPM

( This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted

by Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, Nashik in

respect of students being trained at Grant Medical College,

Mumbai, Karnataka on or after 1966).

“Doctor of Medicine ( Radio Diagnosis)”

M D ( Radio Diagnosis)

( This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted

by Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, Nashik in

respect of students being trained at Bombay Hospital Institute

of Medical Sciences, Mumbai on or after 1995).

(q) against “Homi Bhabha National Institute (Deemed University), Mumbai” under the heading ‘Recognised Medical

Qualification’ [ hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading

‘Abbreviation for Registration’ [ hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely :—

“Diploma in Radiation Medicine”

D R M

( This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted

by Homi Bhabha National Institute (Deemed University),

Mumbai in respect of students being trained at Tata Memorial

Centre, Mumbai).

(2)

(3)

970

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(r) against “Dr. D. Y. Patil University, Pune” under the heading ‘Recognised Medical Qualification’ [ hereinafter referred

to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation for Registration’

[ hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely :—

“Diploma in Public Health”

D P H

( This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted

by Dr. D. Y. Patil University, Pune in respect of students being

trained at Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Pimpri, Pune on or

after November, 2009).

“Magistrar of Chirurgiae (Neuro Surgery)”

M. Ch (Neuro Surgery)

( This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted

by Dr. D. Y. Patil University, Pune in respect of students being

trained at Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Pimpri, Pune on or

after October, 2009).

(s) against ‘‘Padamshree Dr. D. Y. Patil University, Navi Mumbai” under the heading ‘Recognised Medical Qualification’

[hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation for

Registration’ [ hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely :—

“Doctor of Medicine (Radio Diagnosis)”

MD (Radio diagnosis)

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted

by Padamshree Dr. D. Y. Patil University, Navi Mumbai in

respect of students being trained at Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical

College, Hospital & Research Centre, Navi Mumbai on or after

July, 2009).

“Diploma in Tuberculosis & Chest Diseases”

DTCD

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted

by Padamshree Dr. D. Y. Patil University, Navi Mumbai in

respect of students being trained at Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical

College, Hospital & Research Centre, Navi Mumbai on or after

June, 2009).

(t) against ‘‘Shivaji University ” under the heading ‘Recognised Medical Qualification’ [ hereinafter referred to as

column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation for Registration’ [ hereinafter

referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely :—

“Doctor of Medicine (General Medicine)”

MD (General Medicine)

( This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted

by Shivaji University, in respect of students being trained at

Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Kolhapur on or after May, 2008).

(u) against ‘‘Dr. D. Y. Patil University, Kolhapur ” under the heading ‘Recognised Medical Qualification’ [ hereinafter

referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation for

Registration’ [ hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely :—

“Doctor of Medicine (General Medicine)”

MD (General Medicine)

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted

by Dr. D. Y. Patil University Kolhapur , in respect of students

being trained at Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Kolhapur on or

after May, 2008).

(v) against ‘‘Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences University, Nagpur ” under the heading ‘Recognised Medical

Qualification’ [ hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading

‘Abbreviation for Registration’ [ hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely :—

(2)

(3)

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

971

“Doctor of Medicine (Paediatrics)”

MD (Paediatrics)

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted

by Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences University

Nagpur , in respect of students being trained at J. N. Medical

College, Swangi, Wardha on or after May, 2009).

(w) against “Pondicherry University,” under the heading ‘Recognised Medical Qualification’ [ hereinafter referred to

as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation for Registration’

[ hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely :—

“Diploma in Gynaecology & Obstetrics”

DGO

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted

by Pondicherry University in respect of students being trained

at Mahatma Gandhi Medical College, & Research Institute,

Puducherry on or after July, 2009).

“Diploma in Child Health”

D C H

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted

by Pondicherry University in respect of students being trained

at Mahatma Gandhi Medical College & Research Institute,

Puducherry on or after July, 2009).

(w.) against “Punjab University,” under the heading ‘Recognised Medical Qualification’ [ hereinafter referred to as

column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation for Registration’

[ hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely :—

“Doctor of Medicine (SPM/Community Medicine)”

MD (SPM/Community Medicine)

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted

by Punjab University in respect of students being trained at

Govt. Medical College, Chandigarh on or after July, 2006).

“Doctor of Medicine (Forensic Medicine)”

MD (Forensic Medicine)

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted

by Punjab University in respect of students being trained at

Govt. Medical College Chandigarh on or after April, 2006).

(x) against “Rajasthan University,” under the heading ‘Recognised Medical Qualification’ [ hereinafter referred to as

column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation for Registration’

[ hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely :—

“Doctor of Medicine (Master of Surgery)”

MD/MS (Obst. & Gynae.)

(Obstetrics & Gynaecology)

( This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted

by Rajathan University in respect of students being trained at

J. L. N. Medical College, Ajmer on or after 1978).

“Diploma in Anaesthesia”

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted

by Rajasthan University in respect of students being trained at

Sardar Patel Medical College Bikaner on or after July, 1968.

(y) against “Rajasthan University of Health Sciences, Jaipur” under the heading ‘Recognised Medical Qualification’

[hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation for

Registration’ [ hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely :—

“Doctor of Medicine (Master of Surgery”

MD /MS (Obst. & Gynae.)

(Obstetrics & Gynaecology)

(2)

(3)

972

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted

by Rajasthan University of Health Sciences, Jaipur in respect

of students being trained at J. L. N. Medical College, Ajmer on

or after 1978.

“Diploma in Anaesthesia”

D A

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted

by Rajasthan University of Health Sciences, Jaipur in respect

of students being trained at Sardar Patel Medical College,

Bikaner on or after July, 1968).

(z) against “Dr. RML Avadh University, Uttar Pradesh” under the heading ‘Recognised Medical Qualification’

[ hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation

for Registration’ [ hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely :—

“Diploma in Gynaecology & Obstetrics”

D G O

( This shall be a recognised medical qualification when

granted by Dr. RML Avadh University, Uttar Pradesh in

respect of students being trained at Era’s Lucknow Medical

College, Lucknow on or after January, 2010).

“Diploma in Tuberculosis & Chest Diseases”

D T C D

( This shall be a recognised medical qualification when

granted by Dr. RML Avadh University, Uttar Pradesh in

respect of students being trained at Era’s Lucknow Medical

College, Lucknow on or after December, 2009).

“Diploma in Psychological Medicine”

D P M

( This shall be a recognised medical qualification when

granted by Dr. RML Avadh University, Uttar Pradesh in respect

of students being trained at Era’s Lucknow Medical College,

Lucknow on or after December, 2009).

“Diploma in Child Health”

D C H

( This shall be a recognised medical qualification when

granted by Dr. RML Avadh University, Uttar Pradesh in respect

of students being trained at Era’s Lucknow Medical College,

Lucknow on or after December, 2009).

“Diploma in Otolaryngology”

D L O

( This shall be a recognised medical qualification when

granted by Dr. RML Avadh University, Uttar Pradesh in respect

of students being trained at Era’s Lucknow Medical College,

Lucknow on or after January, 2010).

(aa) against “Calicut University Kerala” under the heading ‘Recognised Medical Qualification’

[ hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation

for Registration’ [ hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely :—

“Doctor of Medicine (Radio Diagnosis)”

MD (Radio Diagnosis)

( This shall be a recognised medical qualification when

granted by Calicut University, in respect of students being

trained at Calicut Medical College, Calicut Kerala on or after

October, 1999).

(2)

(3)

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

973

“Diploma in Medical Radio Diagnosis”

DMRD

( This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted

by Calicut University, in respect of students being trained at

Calicut Medical College, Calicut Kerala on or after October,

1984).

“Magistrar Chirurgiae (Neuro Surgery)”

M. Ch (Neuro Surgery)

( This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted

by Calicut University, in respect of students being trained at

Calicut Medical College, Calicut Kerala on or after October,

1998).

(bb) against “Madurai University” under the heading ‘Recognised Medical Qualification’ [ hereinafter referred to as

column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation for Registration’ [ hereinafter

referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely :—

“Doctor of Medicine (Forensic Medicine)”

MD (Forensic Medicine)

( This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted

by Madurai University, in respect of students being trained at

Tirunelveli Medical College, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu on or after

1981).

(cc) against “Madurai Kamraj University” under the heading ‘Recognised Medical Qualification’ [ hereinafter referred

to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation for Registration’

[hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely :—

“Doctor of Medicine (Forensic Medicine)”

MD (Forensic Medicine)

( This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted

by Madurai Kamraj University, in respect of students being

trained at Tirunelveli Medical College, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu

on or after 1981).

(dd) against “Madras University Chennai” under the heading ‘Recognised Medical Qualification’ [hereinafter referred

to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation for Registration’

[hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely :—

“Doctor of Medicine (Forensic Medicine)”

MD (Forensic Medicine)

( This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted

by Madras University, in respect of students being trained at

Tirunelveli Medical College, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu on or after

1981).

(ee) against “The Tamilnadu Dr. MGR Medical University Chennai” under the heading ‘Recognised Medical Qualification’

[hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation for

Registration’ [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely :—

“Doctor of Medicine (Forensic Medicine)”

MD (Forensic Medicine)

( This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted

by The Tamilnadu Dr. MGR Medical University, Chennai in

respect of students being trained at Tirunelveli Medical Col-

lege, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu on or after 1981).

Note to all : 1.

The recognition so granted to a Postgraduate Course shall be for a maximum period of 5 years, upon

which it shall have to be renewed.

Failure to seek timely renewal of recognition as required in sub-clause-4 shall invariably result in

stoppage of admissions to the concerned postgraduate Course.

[No. U. 12012/161/2010-ME (P. II)]

ANITA TRIPATHI, Under Secy.

(2)

(3)

974

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ubZ fnYyh] 30 uoEcj] 2010

dk-vk- 359-—dsUæh; ljdkj] nar fpfdRlk vf/fu;e] 1948 (1948 dk 16) dh /kjk (10) dh mi/kjk (2) }kjk iznÙk

'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, Hkkjrh; nar fpfdRlk ifj"kn~ ls ijke'kZ djds] mDr vf/fu;e ds vuqlwph ds Hkkx 1 esa fuEufyf[kr la'kks/u

djrh gS] uker%&

2- eg£"k n;kuan fo'ofo|ky;] jksgrd }kjk iznku dh tk jgh nar fpfdRlk fMfxz;ksa dks ekU;rk nsus ds ckjs esa nar fpfdRlk

vf/fu;e] 1948 (1948 dk 16) dh vuqlwph ds Hkkx&1 esa Øe la[;k 25 ds lkeus dkWye 2 ,oa 3 dh ekStwnk izfof"V;ksa esa blds i'pkr~

fuEufyf[kr izfof"V;ksa dks var£o"V fd;k tk,xk %&

¶IV- ekuo jpuk nar fpfdRlk dkWyst] iQjhnkckn

(i)

nar fpfdRlk ltZjh esa cSpyj

ch Mh ,l] eg£"k n;kuan fo'ofo|ky;] jksgrd¸

(;fn fnukad 07&09&2010 dks ;k mlds ckn iznku dh xbZ gS )

¹iQk- la- oh- 12017@116@2005&Mh bZº

lwcs ¯lg] mi lfpo

New Delhi, the 30th November, 2010

S.O. 359.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of Section 10 of the Dentists Act, 1948 (16 of

1948), the Central Government, after consultation with the Dental Council of India, hereby, makes the following amendments

in Part-I of the Schedule to the said Act, namely:-

2. In the existing entries of column 2 & 3 against Serial No. 25, in Part-I of the Schedule to the Dentists Act, 1948

(16 of 1948) pertainting to recognition of dental degrees awarded by Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, the following

entries shall be inserted thereunder:-

‘‘IV Manav Rachna Dental College, Faridabad

(i)

Bachelor of Dental Surgery

(if granted on or after 07-09-2010)

BDS, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak”

[F.No.V-12017/116/2005-DE]

SUBE SINGH, Dy. Secy.

ubZ fnYyh] 1 fnlEcj] 2010

dk-vk- 360-—Hkkjrh; fpfdRlk ifj"kn~ vf/fu;e] 1956 (1956 dk 102) dh /kjk 11 dh mi/kjk (2) }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk

iz;ksx djrs gq, dsUnz ljdkj Hkkjrh; fpfdRlk ifj"kn~ ls ijke'kZ djds lEc¼ fo'ofo|ky; ds uke esa ifjorZu ds dkj.k mDr vf/fu;e

dh izFke vuqlwph esa fuEufyf[kr vkSj la'kks/u djrh gS uker%—

(d) Jh osadVs'oj vk;q£oKku laLFkku (ekun fo'ofo|ky;) vkU/z izns'k ds lkeus 'kh"kZd ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk ¹tksfd

vkxs dkWye(2) ds :i esa lan£Hkr gSºds varxZr vafre izfof"V vkSj mlls lacaf/r izfof"V ds ckn 'kh"kZd iathdj.k ds fy, la{ksi.k ¹tksfd

vkxs dkWye (3) ds :i esa lan£Hkrº ds lkeus fuEufyf[kr 'kkfey fd;k tk,xk] vFkkZr~

(2)

(3)

¶MkWDVj vkWiQ esfMflu (bUMksØhuksykWth)¸

Mh-,e-(bUMksØhuksykWth)

(;g tqykbZ] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn Jh osadVs'oj vk;q£oKku laLFkku] vkU/z izns'k esa

izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa Jh osadVs'oj vk;q£oKku laLFkku (ekun

fo'ofo|ky;) vkU/z izns'k }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ) A

([k) futke vkq;£oKku laLFkku (ekun fo'ofo|ky; ) gSnjkckn] vkU/z izns'k ds lkeus 'kh"kZd ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk

¹tksfd vkxs dkWye (2) ds :i esa lan£Hkr gSº ds varxZr vafre izfof"V vkSj mlls lacaf/r izfof"V ds ckn 'kh"kZd iathdj.k ds fy,

la{kis.k ¹tksfd vkxs dkWye (3) ds :i esa lan£Hkr gSº ds lkeus fuEufyf[kr 'kkfey fd;k tk,xk] vFkkZr~

¶MkDVj vkWiQ esfMlu (jhesVksykWth)¸

Mh ,e (jhesVksykWth)

(;g tqykbZ] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn futke vk;q£oKku laLFkku] gSnjkckn] vkU/z izns'k

esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa futke vk;q£oKku laLFkku] gSnjkckn] vkU/z izns'k

}kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

975

(x) mLekfu;k fo'ofo|ky;] gSnjkckn ds lkeus 'kh"kZd ekU;rk izkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk ¹tksfd vkxs dkWye (2) ds :i esa lan£Hkr

gSº ds varxZr vafre izfof"V vkSj mlls lacaf/r izfof"V ds ckn 'kh"kZd iathdj.k ds fy, la{ksi.k ¹tksfd vkxs dkWye (3) ds :i esa lan£Hkr

gSº ds lkeus fuEufyf[kr 'kkfey fd;k tk,xk] vFkkZr~

¶ekLVj vkWiQ ltZjh (us=k jksx foKku)¸

,e ,l (us=k jksx foKku)

(;g 1975 esa vFkok mlds ckn dkdfr;k esfMdy dkyst] okjaxy] vkU/z izns'k esa

izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa mLekfu;k fo'ofo|ky;] gSnjkckn }kjk LohÑr

fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ) A

(?k) dkdfr;k fo'ofo|ky;] vkU/z izns'k ds lkeus 'kh"kZd ekU;rk izkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk ¹tksfd vkxs dkWye (2) ds :Ik esa

lan£Hkr gSº ds varxZr vafre izfof"V vkSj mlls lacaf/r izfof"V ds ckn 'kh"kZd iathdj.k ds fy, la{ksi.k ¹tksfd vkxs dkWye (3) ds :i

esa lan£Hkr gSº ds lkeus fuEufyf[kr 'kkfey fd;k tk,xk] vFkkZr~

¶ekLVj vkWiQ ltZjh (us=k jksx foKku)¸

,e ,l (us=k jksx foKku)

(;g 1975 esa vFkok mlds ckn dkdfr;k esfMdy dkWyst] okjaxy] vkU/z izns'k esa

izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa dkdfr;k fo'ofo|ky;] vkU/z izns'k }kjk

LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ) A

(Ä) vkU/z izns'k LokLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky;] fot;okMk] vkU/z izns'k ds lkeus 'kh"kZd ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk ¹tksfd

vkxs dkWye (2) ds :i esa lan£Hkr gSº ds varxZr vafre izfof"V vkSj mlls lacaf/r izfof"V ds ckn 'kh"kZd iathdj.k ds fy, la{ksi.k ¹tksfd

vkxs dkWye (3) ds :i esa lan£Hkr gSº ds lkeus fuEufyf[kr 'kkfey fd;k tk,xk] vFkkZr~

¶ekLVj vkWiQ ltZjh (us=k jksx foKku)¸

,e ,l (us=k jksx foKku)

(;g 1975 esa vFkok mlds ckn dkdfr;k esfMdy dkyst] okjaxy] vkU/z izns'k esa

izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa vkU/z izns'k LokLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky; }kjk

LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

(p) Mk- ,uVhvkj vk;q£oKku fo'ofo|ky;] fot;okMk] vkU/z izns'k ds lkeus 'kh"kZd ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk ¹tksfd vkxs

dkWye (2) ds :i esa lan£Hkr gSº ds varxZr vafre izfof"V vkSj mlls lacaf/r izfof"V ds ckn 'kh"kZd iathdj.k ds fy, la{ksi.k ¹tksfd vkxs

dkWye (3) ds :i esa lan£Hkr gSº ds lkeus fuEufyf[kr 'kkfey fd;k tk,xk] vFkkZr~

¶ekLVj vkWiQ ltZjh (us=k jksx foKku)¸

,e ,l (us=k jksx foKku)

(;g 1975 esa vFkok mlds ckn dkdfr;k fpfdRlk egkfo|ky; okjaxy] vkU/z izns'k esa

izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa MkW- ,uVhvkj LokLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky;]

fot;okMk }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶MkDVj vkWiQ esfMlu (MjesVksywth]

,e Mh (Mhoh,y)

ohuhjksyksth ,oa ysizkslh)¸

(;g ebZ] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn MsDdu vk;q£oKku egkfo|ky; vkU/z izns'k esa

izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa MkW- ,uVhvkj LokLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky;]

fot;okMk }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶fMIyksek bu pkbYM gsYFk¸

Mhlh,p

(;g ebZ] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn ,loh,l fpfdRlk egkfo|ky;] egcwc uxj vkU/z

izns'k esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa MkW- ,uVhvkj LokLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky;]

fot;okMk }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

(N) ch ,u e.MYk fo'ofo|ky;] fcgkj ds lkeus 'kh"kZd ekU;rk izkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk ¹tksfd dkWye (2) ds :i esa lan£Hkr gSº ds

varxZr vafre izfof"V vkSj mlls lacaf/r izfof"V ds ckn 'kh"kZd iathdj.k ds fy, la{ksi.k ¹tksfd vkxs dkWye (3) ds :i esa lan£Hkr gSº

ds lkeus fuEufyf[kr 'kkfey fd;k tk,xk] vFkkZr~

(2)

(3)

976

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

¶fMIyksek bu vksClVsfVªd ,.M xk;ukdksykth¸

Mhthvks

(;g ekpZ] 2010 eas vFkok mlds ckn ekrk xqtjh fpfdRlk egkfo|ky;] fd'kuxat] fcgkj

esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa ch ,u e.My fo'ofo|ky; fcgkj }kjk

LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

(t) jkaph fo'ofo|ky;] >kj[k.M ds lkeus 'kh"kZd ekU;rk izkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk ¹tksfd vkxs dkWye (2) ds :i esa lan£Hkr gSº

ds varxZr vafre izfof"V vkSj mlls lacaf/r izfof"V ds ckn 'kh"kZd iathdj.k ds fy, la{ksi.k ¹tksfd vkxs dkWye (3) ds :i esa lan£Hkr

gSº ds lkeus fuEufyf[kr 'kkfey fd;k tk,xk] vFkkZr~

¶fMIyksek bu Dyhfudy iSFkksyksth¸

Mhlhih

(;g 1979 esa vFkok mlds ckn jktsUnz vk;q£oKku laLFkku] jkaph esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs

fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ eas jkaph fo'ofo|ky;] >kj[kaM }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr

fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶fMIyksek bu vksFkksZisfMDl¸

Mh vksFkksZ

(;g 1981 esa vFkok mlds ckn jktsUnz vk;q£oKku laLFkku] jkaph esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs

fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa jkaph fo'ofo|ky;] >kj[k.M }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr

fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

(>) Hkkouxj fo'ofo|ky;] Hkkouxj] xqtjkr ds lkeus 'kh"kZd ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk ¹tksfd vkxs dkWye (2) ds :i esa

lan£Hkr gSº ds varxZr vafre izfof"V vkSj mlls lacaf/r izfof"V ds ckn 'kh"kZd iathdj.k ds fy, la{ksi.k ¹tksfd vkxs dkWye (3) ds :i

esa lan£Hkr gSº ds lkeus fuEufyf[kr 'kkfey fd;k tk,xk] vFkkZr~

¶ekLVj vkWiQ ltZjh (vks/ksaisfMDl)¸

,e ,l (vksFkksiasfMDl)

(;g o"kZ vizSy] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn ljdkjh fpfdRlk egkfo|ky;] Hkkouxj]

xqtjkr esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa Hkkouxj fo'ofo|ky;] Hkkouxj]

xqtjkr }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶MWkDVj vkWiQ esfMflu (fiQft;ksykth)¸

,e Mh (fiQft;ksykth)

(;g o"kZ ekpZ] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn ljdkjh fpfdRlk egkfo|ky; Hkkouxj] xqtjkr

esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa Hkkouxj fo'ofo|ky;] Hkkouxj] xqtjkr }kjk

LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ) A

¶MkWDVj vkWiQ esfMflu (iQksjsfUld esfMlu)¸ ,e Mh (iQksjsfUld esfMflu)

(;g o"kZ ekpZ] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn ljdkjh fpfdRlk egkfo|ky; Hkkouxj] xqtjkr

esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa Hkkouxj fo'ofo|ky;] Hkkouxj] xqtjkr }kjk

LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶MkWDVj vkWiQ (ekbØksck;ksyksth)¸

,e Mh (ekbØksck;ksyksth)

(;g o"kZ ekpZ] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn ljdkjh fpfdRlk egkfo|ky; Hkkouxj] xqtjkr

esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa Hkkouxj fo'ofo|ky;] Hkkouxj] xqtjkr }kjk

LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh)A

¶MkWDVj vkWiQ esfMflu ({k; jksx rFkk Nkrh

,e Mh (Vhch ,.M jslifjVjh fMtht)

jksx@'olu rU=k jksx)¸

(;g o"kZ vizSy] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn ljdkjh fpfdRlk egkfo|ky;] Hkkouxj]

xqtjkr esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa Hkkouxj fo'ofo|ky;] Hkkouxj]

xqtjkr }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh)A

(2)

(3)

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

977

¶fMIyksek bu Vwcjdwyksfll ,.M psLV Mhftt¸

MhVhlhMh

(;g o"kZ vizSy] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn ljdkjh fpfdRlk egkfo|ky; Hkkouxj] xqtjkr

esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa Hkkouxj fo'ofo|ky;] Hkkouxj] xqtjkr

}kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶fMIyksek bu pkbYM gsYFk¸

Mhlh,p

(;g o"kZ vizSy] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn ljdkjh fpfdRlk egkfo|ky; Hkkouxj] xqtjkr

esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa Hkkouxj fo'ofo|ky;] Hkkouxj] xqtjkr

}kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶fMIyksek bu vksDLVsfVªDl ,.M xk;ukdksyksth¸

Mhthvks

(;g o"kZ vizSy] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn ljdkjh fpfdRlk egkfo|ky; Hkkouxj] xqtjkr

esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa Hkkouxj fo'ofo|ky;] Hkkouxj] xqtjkr

}kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶fMIyksek bu Dyhfudy iSFkksyksth¸

Mhlhih

(;g o"kZ vizSy] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn ljdkjh fpfdRlk egkfo|ky; Hkkouxj] xqtjkr

esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa Hkkouxj fo'ofo|ky;] Hkkouxj] xqtjkr

}kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

(.k.k) ve`rkfo'o fo|kihBe~] dks;EcwVj ds lkeus 'kh"kZd ekU;rk izkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk ¹tksfd vkxs dkWye (2) ds :i esa

lan£Hkr gSº ds varxZr vafre izfof"V vkSj mlls lacaf/r izfof"V ds ckn 'kh"kZd iathdj.k ds fy, la{ksi.k ¹tksfd vkxs dkWye (3) ds :i

esa lan£Hkr gSº ds lkeus fuEufyf[kr 'kkfey fd;k tk,xk] vFkkZr~ %µ

¶MkDVj vkWiQ esfMflu (isfM;kfVªDl)¸

,e Mh (isfM;kfVªDl)

(;g o"kZ twu] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn ve`rk Ldwy vkWiQ esfMflu] dksfPp esa izf'kf{kr

fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa ve`rk fo'o ihBe~] dks;EcVwj }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij

ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

(V) dqUuwj fo'ofo|ky;] dsjy ds lkeus 'kh"kZd ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk ¹tksfd vkxs dkWye (2) ds :i esa lan£Hkr gSº ds

varxZr vafre izfof"V vkSj mlls lacaf/r izfof"V ds ckn 'kh"kZd iathdj.k ds fy, la{ksi.k ¹tksfd vkxs dkWye (3) ds :i esa lan£Hkr gSº

ds lkeus fuEufyf[kr 'kkfey fd;k tk,xk] vFkkZr~ %µ

¶MkWDVj vkWiQ esfMflu (isfM;kfVªDl)¸

,e Mh (isfM;kfVªDl)

(;g ekpZ] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn vk;q£oKku vdkneh] ifj;kje~] dqUuwj esa izf'kf{kr

fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa dqUuwj fo'ofo|ky;] dsjy }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij

ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

(B) dkyhdV fo'ofo|ky;] dsjy ds lkeus 'kh"kZd ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk ¹tksfd vkxs dkWye (2) ds :i esa lan£Hkr gSº

ds varxZr vafre izfof"V vkSj mlls lacaf/r izfof"V ds ckn 'kh"kZd iathdj.k ds fy, la{ksi.k ¹tksfd vkxs dkWye (3) ds :i esa lan£Hkr

gSº ds lkeus fuEufyf[kr 'kfey fd;k tk,xk] vFkkZr~ %µ

¶ekLVj vkWiQ ltZjh (vksiFkkdksyksth)¸

,e ,l (vksFkksZ)

(;g twu] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn ljdkjh esfMdy dkyst] f=klwj esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk

jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa dkyhdV fo'ofo|ky;] dsjy }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij

ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶MkWDVj vkWiQ esfMflu (lkbpsVªh)¸

,e Mh (lkbpsVªh)

(;g twu] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn ljdkjh fpfdRlk egkfo|ky;] f=klwj] dsjy esa

izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa dkyhdV fo'ofo|ky;] dsjy }kjk LohÑr

fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

(2)

(3)

978

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

¶ekLVj vkWiQ esfMflu (jsfM;ks Mk;Xuksfll)¸ ,e Mh (jsfM;ks Mk;Xuksfll)

(;g uoEcj] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn ljdkjh esfMdy dkyst] f=klwj esa izf'kf{kr fd,

tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa dkyhdV fo'ofo|ky;] dsjy }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij

ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶ekLVj vkWiQ esfMflu (isfM;kfVªDl)¸

,e Mh (isfM;kfVªDl)

(;g twu 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn ljdkjh esfMdy dkyst] f=klwj esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk

jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa dkyhdV fo'ofo|ky;] dsjy }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij

ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

(M) dsjy fo'ofo|ky;] dsjy ds lkeus 'kh"kZd ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk ¹tksfd vkxs dkWye (2) ds :i esa lan£Hkr gSº ds

varxZr vafre izfof"V vkSj mlls lacaf/r izfof"V ds ckn 'kh"kZd iathdj.k ds fy, la{ksi.k ¹tksfd vkxs dkWye (3) ds :i esa lan£Hkr gSº

ds lkeus fuEufyf[kr 'kkfey fd;k tk,xk] vFkkZr~ %µ

¶fMIyksek bu Duhfudy isFkksyksth¸

Mhlhih

(;g 1963 esa vFkok mlds ckn ljdkjh esfMdy dkyst]fr:ouUriqje] dsjy esa izf'kf{kr

fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa dsjy fo'ofo|ky;] dsjy }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij

ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

(<) dqosEiw fo'ofo|ky; ds lkeus 'kh"kZd ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk ¹tksfd dkWye (2) ds :i esa lan£Hkr gSº ds varxZr

vafre izfof"V vkSj mlls lacf/r izfof"V ds ckn 'kh"kZd iathdj.k ds fy, la{ksi.k ¹tksfd vkxs dkWye (3) ds :i esa lan£Hkr gSº ds lkeus

fuEufyf[kr 'kkfey fd;k tk,xk] vFkkZRk~ %µ

¶MkWDVj vkiQ esfMflu (iQksjsfUld esfMflu)¸ ,e Mh (iQksjsfUld esfMflu)

(;g 2002 esa vFkok mlds ckn tsts,e esfMdy dkyst] nko.kxsjs] dukZVd esa izf'kf{kr

fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa dqosEiw fo'ofo|ky; }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij

ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶fMIyksek bu esfMdy jsfM;ks Mk;xuksfll¸

Mh,evkjMh

(;g 1979 esa vFkok mlds ckn tsts,e esfMdy dkyst] nko.kxsjs] dukZVd esa izf'kf{kr

fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa dqosEiw fo'ofo|ky; }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij

ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

(.k) jktho xka/h vk;q£oKku fo'ofo|ky;] caxykSj ds lkeus 'kh"kZd ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk ¹tksfd vkxs dkWye (2) ds

:i esa lan£Hkr gSº ds varxZr vafre izfof"V vkSj mlls lacaf/r izfof"V ds ckn 'kh"kZd iathdj.k ds fy, la{ksi.k ¹tksfd vkxs dkWye (3)

ds :i esa lan£Hkr gSº ds lkeus fuEufyf[kr 'kkfey fd;k tk,xk] vFkkZr~ %µ

¶MkDVj vkWiQ esfMflu (iQksjsfUld esfMflu)

,e Mh (iQksjsfUld esfMflu)

(;g 2002 esa vFkok mlds ckn tsts,e esfMdy dkyst] nko.kxsjs] dukZVd esa izf'kf{kr

fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa jktho xka/h vk;q£oKku fo'ofo|ky;] caxykSj }kjk

LOkhÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rk izkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶fMIyksek bu esfMdy jsfM;ks Mk;xuksfll¸

Mh,evkjMh

(;g 1979 esa vFkok mlds ckn tsts,e esfMdy dkyst] nko.kxsjs] dukZVd esa izf'kf{kr

fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa jktho xka/h vk;q£oKku fo'ofo|ky;] caxykSj }kjk

LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶MkWDVj vkWiQ esfMflu (iSFkksyksth)¸

,e Mh (iSFkksyksth)

(;g twu] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn osnsgh vk;q£oKku ,oa vuqla/ku laLFkku] caxYkkSj esa

izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa jktho xka/h vk;q£oKku fo'ofo|ky; caxykSj

}kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

(2)

(3)

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

979

¶MWkDVj vkiQ esfMflu (U;wjksyksth)¸

,e Mh (U;wjksyksth)

(;g tqykbZ] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn ,e- ,l- jkeS;k esfMdy dkyst] caxykSj esa

izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa jktho xka/h vk;q£oKku fo'ofo|ky;] caxykSj

}kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶MkWDVj vkiQ esfMflu@ekLVj vkiQ

,eMh@,e ,l (,UkkVkWeh)

ltZjh (,ukVkWeh)¸

(;g tqykbZ] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn Jh fl¼kFkZ esfMdy dkyst] Vqedqj] dukZVd esa

izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa jktho xka/h LokLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky;]

caxykSj }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶MkWDVj vkiQ esfMflu (fiQft;ksykWth)¸

,eMh (fiQft;ksykWth)

(;g twu] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn Jh fl¼kFkZ esfMdy dkyst] Vqedqj] dukZVd esa

izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ eas jktho xka/h vk;q£oKku fo'ofo|ky;] caxykSj

}kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶MkWDVj vkiQ esfMflu ({k; jksx ,oa 'olu

,eMh (Vh-ch- jsLihjsVjh@iqyeksujh esfMflu)

jksx@iqyeksujh esfMflu)¸

(;g ebZ] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn ;susiks;k esfMdy dkyst] eaxyksj] dukZVd esa

izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa jktho xka/h LokLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky;]

caxykSj }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶MWkDVj vkiQ esfMflu (fofdj.k funku)¸

,eMh (fofdj.k funku)

(;g twu] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn dseisxksMk vk;q£oKku laLFkku] caxykSj] dukZVd esa

izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa jktho xka/h LokLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky;]

caxykSj }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶laosnukgj.k foKku esa fMIyksek¸

Mh,

(;g ebZ] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn ,eohts esfMdy dkyst] caxykSj] dukZVd esa izf'kf{kr

fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa jktho xka/h LokLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky;] caxykSj }kjk

LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

(r) ^ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk* 'kh"kZd ds varxZr ¶iwuk fo'ofo|ky;¸ ¹tksfd vkxs dkWye (2) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº ds

lkeus ^iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr uke* 'kh"kZd ds varxZr vafre izfof"V ,oa mlls lacaf/r izfof"V ¹blds ckn dkWye (3) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº

ds ckn fuEufyf[kr var£o"V fd;k tk,xk] vFkkZr~ %µ

¶MkWDVj vkWiQ esfMflu (fiQft;ksykWth)¸

,e Mh (fiQft;ksykWth)

(;g 1994 esa vFkok mlds ckn :jy esfMdy dkyst yksuh] egkjk"Vª esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk

jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa iwuk fo'ofo|ky; }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr

fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

(Fk) ^ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk* 'kh"kZd ds varxZr ¶izoj vk;q£oKku laLFkku (ekun fo'ofo|ky;)] yksuh¸ ¹tksfd vkxs

dkWye (2) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº ds lkeus ^iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr uke* 'kh"kZd ds varxZr vafre izfof"V ,oa mlls lacaf/r izfof"V ¹blds

ckn dkWye (3) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº ds ckn fuEufyf[kr var£o"V fd;k tk,xk] vFkkZr~ %µ

¶MkWDVj vkWiQ esfMflu (fiQft;ksykWth)¸

,e Mh (fiQft;ksykWth)

(;g 1994 esa vFkok mlds ckn :jy esfMdy dkyst yksuh] egkjk"Vª esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk

jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa izoj vk;q£oKku laLFkku (ekun fo'ofo|ky;] yksuh) }kjk

LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

(2)

(3)

980

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

¶ekLVj vkWiQ ltZjh (bZ,uVh)¸

,e ,l (bZ,uVh)

(;g twu] 2010 dks vFkok mlds ckn :jy esfMdy dkyst] yksuh] egkjk"Vª esa izf'kf{kr

fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa izoj vk;q£oKku laLFkku (ekun fo'ofo|ky;]yksuh)

}kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶vksVksysfjaxksykWth esa fMIyksek¸

Mh,yvks

(;g twu] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn :jy esfMdy dkyst yksuh] egkjk"Vª esa izf'kf{kr

fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa izoj vk;q£oKku laLFkku (ekun fo'ofo|ky;] yksuh)

}kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

(n) ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk 'kh"kZd ds varxZr ¶ukxiqj fo'ofo|ky;¸ ¹tksfd vkxs dkWye (2) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº ds

lkeus ^iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr uke* 'kh"kZd ds varxZr vafre izfof"V ,oa mlls lacaf/r izfof"V ¹blds ckn dkWye (3) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº

ds ckn fuEufyf[kr var£o"V fd;k tk,xk] vFkkZr~

¶tu LokLF; esa fMIyksek¸

Mhih,p

(;g 1982 esa vFkok mlds ckn xouZesaV esfMdy dkyst] ukxiqj] egkjk"Vª esa izf'kf{kr

fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa ukxiqj fo'ofo|ky; }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rk&

izkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

(/) ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk 'kh"kZd ds varxZr ¶vkjVh,e ukxiqj fo'ofo|ky;¸ ¹tksfd vkxs dkWye (2) ds :i esa

fu£n"Vº ds lkeus ^iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr uke* 'kh"kZd ds varxZr vafre izfof"V ,oa mlls lacaf/r izfof"V ¹blds ckn dkWye (3) ds

:i esa fu£n"Vº ds ckn fuEufyf[kr var£o"V fd;k tk,xk] vFkkZr~

¶tu LokLF; esa fMIyksek¸

Mhih,p

(;g 1982 esa vFkok mlds ckn xouZesaV esfMdy dkyst ukxiqj] egkjk"Vª esa izf'kf{kr

fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa vkjVh,e ukxiqj fo'ofo|ky; }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus

ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

(u) ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk 'kh"kZd ds varxZr ¶egkjk"Vª LokLF; foKku laLFkku] ukfld¸ ¹tksfd vkxs dkWye (2) ds :i

esa fu£n"Vº ds lkeus ^iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr uke* 'kh"kZd ds varxZr vafre izfof"V ,oa mlls lacaf/r izfof"V ¹blds ckn dkWye (3) ds

:i esa fu£n"Vº ds ckn fuEufyf[kr var£o"V fd;k tk,xk] vFkkZr~

¶tu LokLF; esa fMIyksek¸

Mhih,p

(;g 1982 esas vFkok mlds ckn xouZesaV esfMdy dkyst] ukxiqj esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs

fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa egkjk"Vª LokLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky;] ukfld }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus

ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶MkWDVj vkWiQ esfMflu (o`Dd foKku)¸

Mh ,e (o`Dd foKku)

(;g 1993 esa vFkok mlds ckn cksEcs vk;q£oKku vLirky laLFkku] eqEcbZ esa izf'kf{kr fd,

tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa egkjk"Vª LokLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky;] ukfld }kjk LohÑr

fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶MkWDVj vkWiQ esfMflu (iQksjasfld esfMflu)¸ ,e Mh (iQksjasfld esfMflu)

(;g 1995 esa vFkok mlds ckn Vh ,u esfMdy dkyst] eqEcbZ esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs

fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ eas egkjk"Vª LokLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky;] ukfld }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus

ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

(2)

(3)

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

981

¶iQksjasfld esfMflu esa fMIyksek¸

Mh ,iQ ,e

(;g 1986 esa vFkok mlds ckn Vh ,u esfMdy dkyst] eqEcbZ esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs

fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa egkjk"Vª LokLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky;] ukfld }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus

ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶cky LokLF; esa fMIyksek¸

Mhlh,p

(;g twu] 1996 esa vFkok mlds ckn Vh ,u esfMdy dkyst] eqEcbZ eas izf'kf{kr fd, tk

jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa egkjk"Vª LokLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky;] ukfld }kjk LohÑr fd,

tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶eftLVªkj vkWiQ fp:ft, (U;wjks ltZjh)¸

,e lh ,p (U;wjks ltZjh)

(;g tuojh] 1989 esa vFkok mlds ckn ,y Vh ,e esfMdy dkyst] eqEcbZ esa izf'kf{kr

fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa egkjk"Vª LokLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky;] ukfld }kjk

LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶ekLVj vkWiQ ltZjh (bZ,uVh)¸

,e ,l (bZ,uVh)

(;g 1993 esa vFkok mlds ckn lathou esfMdy iQkmaQMs'ku bZ,uVh LukrdksÙkj izf'k{k.k

laLFkku] fejkt] egkjk"Vª esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa egkjk"Vª LokLF;

fOkKku fo'ofo|ky;] ukfld }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk

gksxh) A

¶vksVksys¯jxksykWth esa fMIyksek¸

Mh,yvks

(;g 1992 esa vFkok mlds ckn lathou esfMdy iQkmQaMs'ku bZ,uVh LukrdksÙkj izf'k{k.k

laLFkku] fejkt] egkjk"Vª esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa egkjk"Vª LokLF;

foKku fo'ofo|ky;] ukfld }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶MkWDVj vkWiQ esfMflu (iSFkksykWth)¸

,eMh (iSFkksykWth)

(;g tqykbZ] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn egkjk"Vª vk;q£oKku ,oa vuqla/ku laLFkku] ykrqj]

egkjk"Vª esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa egkjk"Vª LokLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky;]

ukfld }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶ekLVj vkWiQ ltZjh (us=k foKku)¸

,e ,l (us=k foKku)

(;g twu] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn egkjk"Vª vk;q£oKku ,oa vuqla/ku laLFkku] ykrqj]

egkjk"Vª esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa egkjk"Vª LokLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky;]

ukfld }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶ekLVj vkWiQ ltZjh (bZ,uVh)¸

,e ,l (bZ,uVh)

(;g tqykbZ] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn ,u-ds-ih- lkYos vk;q£oKku ,oa vuqla/ku dsUnz

laLFkku] ukxiqj] egkjk"Vª esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa egkjk"Vª LokLF;

foKku fo'ofo|ky;] ukfld }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk

gksxh) A

¶ekLVj vkWiQ ltZjh (us=k foKku)¸

,e ,l (us=k foKku)

(;g twu] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn ,u-ds-ih- lkYos vk;q£oKku ,oa vuqla/ku dsUnz

laLFkku] ukxiqj] egkjk"Vª esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa egkjk"Vª LokLF;

foKku fo'ofo|ky;] ukfld }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶MkDVj vkWiQ esfMflu (cky fpfdRlk)¸

,e Mh (cky fpfdRlk)

(;g tqykbZ] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn ,u-ds-ih- lkYos vk;q£oKku ,oa vuqla/ku dsUnz

laLFkku] ukxiqj] egkjk"Vª esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa egkjk"Vª LokLF;

foKku fo'ofo|ky;] ukfld }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

(2)

(3)

982

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

¶MkWDVj vkWiQ esfMflu (tujy esfMflu)¸

,e Mh (tujy esfMflu)

(;g tqykbZ] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn ,u-ds-ih- lkYos vk;q£oKku ,oa vuqla/ku dsUnz

laLFkku] ukxiqj] egkjk"Vª esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa egkjk"Vª LokLF;

foKku fo'ofo|ky;] ukfld }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶MkWDVj vkWiQ esfMflu@ekLVj vkiQ ltZjh

,e Mh@,e,l(vkschth)

(vkschth)¸

(;g tqykbZ] 2010 dks vFkok mlds ckn ,u-ds-ih- lkYos vk;q£oKku ,oa vuqla/ku dsUnz

laLFkku] ukxiqj] egkjk"Vª esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa egkjk"Vª LokLF;

foKku fo'ofo|ky;] ukfld }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶MkWDVj vkWiQ esfMflu (iSFkksykWth)¸

,e Mh (iSFkksykWth)

(;g tqykbZ] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn ,u-ds-ih- lkYos vk;q£oKku ,oa vuqla/ku dsUnz

laLFkku] ukxiqj] egkjk"Vª esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa egkjk"Vª LokLF;

foKku fo'ofo|ky;] ukfld }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶ekLVj vkWiQ ltZjh (tujy ltZjh)¸

,e ,l (tujy ltZjh)

(;g tqykbZ] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn ,u-ds-ih- lkYos vk;q£oKku ,oa vuqla/ku dsUnz

laLFkku] ukxiqj] egkjk"Vª esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa egkjk"Vª LokLF;

foKku fo'ofo|ky;] ukfld }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶esfMdy fofdj.k funku esa fMIyksek¸

Mh,evkjMh

(;g twu] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn ,u-ds-ih- lkYos vk;q£oKku ,oa vuqla/ku dsUnz

laLFkku] ukxiqj] egkjk"Vª esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa egkjk"Vª LokLF;

foKku fo'ofo|ky;] ukfld }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶peZ foKku] osujksykWth ,oa dq"B esa fMIyksek¸ Mh Mh oh ,y

(;g tqykbZ] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn ,u-ds-ih- lkYos vk;q£oKku ,oa vuqla/ku dsUnz

laLFkku] ukxiqj] egkjk"Vª esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa egkjk"Vª LokLF;

foKku fo'ofo|ky;] ukfld }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk

gksxh) A

¶ekLVj vkWiQ ltZjh (tujy ltZjh)¸

,e ,l (tujy ltZjh)

(;g twu] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn , lh ih ,e esfMdy dkyst] /wys] egkjk"Vª esa

izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa egkjk"Vª LokLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky;] ukfld

}kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶ekLVj vkWiQ ltZjh@MWkDVj vkWiQ esfMflu

,e Mh@,e (izlwfr foKku ,oa L=kh jksx foKku)

(izlwfr foKku ,oa L=kh jksx foKku)¸

(;g twu 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn ,lhih,e esfMdy dkyst] /wys] egkjk"Vª esa izf'kf{kr

fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa egkjk"Vª LokLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky;] ukfld }kjk

LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶MkWDVj vkWiQ esfMflu (tujy esfMflu)¸

,e Mh (tujy esfMflu)

(;g twu] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn ,lhih,e esfMdy dkyst] /wys] egkjk"Vª esa izf'kf{kr

fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa egkjk"Vª LokLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky;] ukfld }kjk

LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶MkWDVj vkWiQ esfMflu (iSFkksykWth)¸

Mh ,e (iSFkksykWth)

(;g twu] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn ,lhih,e esfMdy dkyst] /wys] egkjk"Vª esa izf'kf{kr

fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa egkjk"Vª LokLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky;] ukfld }kjk

LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

(2)

(3)

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

983

(i) ^ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk* 'kh"kZd ds varxZr ¶cksEcs@eqEcbZ fo'ofo|ky;¸ ¹tksfd vkxs dkWye (2) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº

ds lkeus ^iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr uke* 'kh"kZd ds varxZr vafre izfof"V ,oa mlls lacaf/r izfof"V (blds ckn dkWye (3) ds :i esa

fu£n"V) ds ckn fuEufyf[kr var£o"V fd;k tk,xk] vFkkZr~ %µ

¶MkWDVj vkWiQ esfMflu (o`Dd foKku)¸

Mh ,e (o`Dd foKku)

(;g 1993 esa vFkok mlds ckn cksEcs vkq;£oKku vLirky laLFkku] eqEcbZ esa izf'kf{kr fd,

tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa cksEcs@eqEcbZ fo'ofo|ky;] }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rk

izkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶MkWDVj vkWiQ esfMflu (iQksjasfld esfMflu)¸ ,e Mh (iQksjsafld esfMflu)

(;g 1995 esa vFkok mlds ckn Vh ,u esfMdy dkyst] eqEcbZ esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs

fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa cksEcs@eqEcbZ fo'ofo|ky; }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr

fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶iQksjasfld esfMflu esa fMIyksek ¸

Mh,iQ,e

(;g 1986 esa vFkok mlds ckn Vh ,u esfMdy dkyst] eqEcbZ esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs

fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa cksEcs@eqEcbZ fo'ofo|ky; }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr

fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶cky LokLF; esa fMIyksek ¸

Mhlh,p

(;g twu] 1996 esa vFkok mlds ckn Vh ,u esfMdy dkyst] eqEcbZ esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk

jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa cksEcs@eqEcbZ fo'ofo|ky; }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr

fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶eftLVªkj vkiQ fp:jth (U;wjks ltZjh) ¸

,elh,p (U;wjks ltZjh)

(tuojh] 1999 esa vFkok mlds ckn ,y- Vh- ,e- fpfdRlk egkfo|ky;] eqEcbZ esa izf'kf{kr

fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa cksEcs@eqEcbZ fo'ofo|ky; egkjk"Vª }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus

ij ekU;rk izkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

(iQ) ¶ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk¸ 'kh"kZd ¹blds ckn dkye (2) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº ds vUrxZr ¶f'kokth] fo'ofo|ky;]

egkjk"Vª¸ ds izfr iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr :i ¹blds ckn dkye (3) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº 'kh"kZd ds varxZr vafre izfof"V ,oa mlls

lacaf/r izfof"V ds ckn fuEufyf[kr dks var£o"V fd;k tk,xk] uker%&

¶ekLVj vkWiQ ltZjh (bZ,uVh)¸

,e,l (bZ,uVh)

(;g 1993 esa vFkok mlds ckn izf'k{k.k laLFkku] fejkt] egkjk"Vª esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs

fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶fMIyksek bu vksVksyks¯jxksyksth¸

Mh,yvks

(;g 1992 esa vFkok mlds ckn ts- ,u- esfMdy dkyst] Lokaxh] o/kZ esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk

jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa izf'kf{k.k laLFkku] fejkt]egkjk"Vª }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij

ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

fo'ofo|ky;] dksYgkiqj] egkjk"Vª¸ ds izfr iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr :i ¹blds ckn dkye(3) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº 'kh"kZd ds varxZr

vafre izfof"V ,oa mlls lacaf/r izfof"V ds ckn fuEufyf[kr dks var£o"V fd;k tk,xk] uker%&

MWkDVj vkWiQ esfMflu (lkbdsVªh)

,e- Mh- (lkbdsVªh)

(;g tqykbZ] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn Mh-okbZ- ikfVy esfMdy dkyst] dksYgkiqj esa

izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa Mh-okbZ- ikfVy fo'ofo|ky;] dksYgkiqj }kjk

LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

(2)

(3)

984

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

MkWDVj vkWiQ esfMflu (,usLFkhfl;k)

,e Mh (,usLFkhfl;k)

(;g tqykbZ] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn Mh-okbZ- ikfVy esfMdy dkyst] dksYgkiqj esa

izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa Mh-okbZ- ikfVy fo'ofo|ky;] dksYgkiqj }kjk

LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

MkWDVj vkWiQ esfMflu (ekbØksck;ksykWth)

,e Mh (ekbØksck;ksykWth)

(;g twu] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn Mh-okbZ- ikfVy esfMdy dkyst] dksYgkiqj esa izf'kf{kr

fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa Mh-okbZ- ikfVy fo'ofo|ky;] dksYgkiqj }kjk LohÑr fd,

tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

ekLVj vkWiQ ltZjh (vkIFkkyeksykWth)

,e Mh (vkIFkkyeksykWth)

(;g tqykbZ] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn Mh-okbZ- ikfVy esfMdy dkyst] dksYgkiqj esa

izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa Mh-okbZ- ikfVy fo'ofo|ky;] dksYgkiqj }kjk

LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

ekLVj vkWiQ esfMflu@ekLVj vkWiQ ltZjh

Mhthvks

(izlwfr jksx foKku ,oa L=khjksx foKku)

(;g twu] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn Mh-okbZ- ikfVy esfMdy dkyst] dksYgkiqj esa izf'kf{kr

fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa Mh-okbZ- ikfVy fo'ofo|ky;] dksYgkiqj }kjk LohÑr fd,

tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

(Hk) ¶ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk¸ 'kh"kZd ¹blds ckn dkye (2) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº ds vUrxZr ¶ineJh MkW-Mh-okbZ- ikfVy

fo'ofo|ky;] iq.ks¸ ds izfr iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr :i ¹blds ckn dkye (3) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº 'kh"kZd ds varxZr vafre izfof"V ,oa

mlls lacaf/r izfof"V ds ckn fuEufyf[kr dks var£o"V fd;k tk,xk] uker%&

eftLVªkj vkiQ fp:jxqos (U;wjks ltZjh)

,e- lh,p (U;wjks ltZjh)

(;g vDVwcj] 2009 esa vFkok mlds ckn Mh-okbZ- ikfVy esfMdy dkyst] dksYgkiqj esa

izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa Mh-okbZ- ikfVy fo'ofo|ky;] iq.ks] }kjk LohÑr

fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

(e) ¶ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk¸ 'kh"kZd ¹blds ckn dkye (2) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº ds vUrxZr ¶mRdy fo'ofo|ky;

mM+hlk¸ ds izfr iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr :i ¹blds ckn dkye (3) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº 'kh"kZd ds varxZr vafre izfof"V ,oa mlls lacf/r

izfof"V ds ckn fuEufyf[kr dks var£o"V fd;k tk,xk] uker%&

¶eftLVªkj vkiQ fp:jxos¸ (isfM;kfVªd ltZjh) ,e-lh,p (isfM;kfVªd ltZjh)

(;g tqykbZ] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn ,l-lh-ch- esfMdy dkyst] mM+hlk esa izf'kf{kr

fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa ¶ mRdy fo'ofo|ky; mM+hlk¸ }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus

ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶eftLVªkj vkiQ fp:jxos¸ (IykfLVd ltZjh)

,e-lh,p (IykfLVd ltZjh)

(;g tqykbZ] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn ,l-lh-ch- esfMdy dkyst] mM+hlk esa izf'kf{kr

fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa ¶mRdy fo'ofo|ky;] mM+hlk¸ }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus

ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

(;) ¶ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk¸ 'kh"kZd ¹blds ckn dkye (2) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº ds vUrxZr ¶ckck iQjhn fo'ofo|ky;

vkWiQ gsYFk lkbal] iQjhndksV] iatkc¸ ds izfr iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr :i ¹blds ckn dkye (3) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº 'kh"kZd ds varxZr

vafre izfof"V ,oa mlls lacaf/r izfof"V ds ckn fuEufyf[kr dks var£o"V fd;k tk,xk]uker%&

MkWDVj vkWiQ esfMflu (isfM;kfVªd)

,e Mh (isfM;kfVªd)

(;g twu] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn Jh xq: jkenkl baLVhV;wV vkWiQ esfMdy lkbal ,aM

fjlpZ] ve`rlj eas izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ eas ¶ckck iQjhn fo'ofo|ky;

(2)

(3)

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

985

vkiQ gsYFk lkbal] iQjhndksV] iatkc¸ }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk

vgZrk gksxh) A

MWkDVj vkWiQ esfMflu (jsfM;ksMkXuksfll)

,e Mh (jsfM;ksMkXuksfll)

(;g twu] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn Jh xq: jkenkl baLVhVÔwV vWkiQ esfMdy lkbal ,aM

fjlpZ] ve`rlj esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa ¶ckck iQjhn fo'ofo|ky;

vkiQ gsYFk lkbal] iQjhndksV] iatkc¸ }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk

vgZrk gksxh) A

ekLVj vkWiQ ltZjh (vkIFkkyeksykWth)

,e ,l (vkIFkkyeksykWth)

(;g twu] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn Jh xq: jkenkl baLVhVÔwV vWkiQ esfMdy lkabl ,aM

fjlpZ] ve`rlj esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa ¶ckck iQjhn fo'ofo|ky;

vkiQ gsYFk lkbal] iQjhndksV] iatkc¸ }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk

vgZrk gksxh) A

(dd) ¶ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk¸ 'kh"kZd ¹blds ckn dkWye (2) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº ds vUrxZr ^^jktLFkku fo'ofo|ky;**

ds izfr iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr :i ¹blds ckn dkye (3) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº 'kh"kZd ds varxZr vafre izfof"V ,oa mlls lacaf/r izfof"V

ds ckn fuEufyf[kr dks var£o"V fd;k tk,xk] uker %&

¶MkWDVj vkWiQ esfMflu (iSFkksykWth)¸

,e Mh (iSFkksykWth)

(;g 1984 esa vFkok mlds ckn ,l-ih- esfMdy dkyst] chdkusj esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs

fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa ¶jktLFkku fo'ofo|ky;¸ }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr

fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶fMIyksek bu pkbYM gsYFk¸

Mh-lh-,p-

(;g 1969 esa vFkok mlds ckn ,l-ih- esfMdy dkyst] chdkusj esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs

fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa ¶jktLFkku fo'ofo|ky;¸ }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr

fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶fMIyksek bu ,usLFkhfl;k¸

Mh-,-

(;g 1981 esa vFkok mlds ckn vkj-,u-Vh- esfMdy dkyst] mn;iqj esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk

jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa ¶jktLFkku fo'ofo|ky;¸ }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr

fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶fMIyksek bu iQksjsafld esfMflu¸

Mh,iQ,e

(;g 1990 esa vFkok mlds ckn ,l ,e ,l esfMdy dkyst] t;iqj esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk

jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa ¶jktLFkku fo'ofo|ky;¸ }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr

fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶MkWDVj vkiQ esfMflu ¸(fiQft;ksyksth)

,eMh (fiQft;ksyksth)

(;g 1969 esa vFkok mlds ckn ,l-ih- esfMdy dkyst] chdkusj esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs

fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa ¶jktLFkku fo'ofo|ky;¸ }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr

fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

([k[k) ¶ ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk¸ 'kh"kZd ¹blds ckn dkye (2) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº ds varxZr ¶jktLFkku fo'ofo|ky;¸

ds izfr iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr :i ¹blds ckn dkye (3) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº 'kh"kZd ds varxZr vafre izfof"V ,oa mlls lacaf/r izfof"V

ds ckn fuEufyf[kr dks var£o"V fd;k tk,xk] uker%&

(2)

(3)

986

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

¶MkWDVj vkiQ esfMflu¸ (iSFkksykth)

,e Mh (iSFkksykth)

(;g 1984 esa vFkok mlds ckn ,l-ih- esfMdy dkyst] chdkusj esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs

fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa ¶jktLFkku fo'ofo|ky;¸ }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rk izkIr

fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶fMIyksek bu pkbYM gsYFk¸

Mh-lh-,p-

(;g 1969 esa vFkok mlds ckn ,l-ih- esfMdy dkyst] chdkusj esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs

fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa ¶jktLFkku fo'ofo|ky;¸ }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rk izkIr

fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶fMIyksek bu ,usLFkhfl;k¸

Mh-,-

(;g 1981 esa vFkok mlds ckn vkj- ,u-Vh- esfMdy dkyst] mn;iqj esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk

jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa ¶jktLFkku fo'ofo|ky;¸ }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rk izkIr

fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶fMIyksek bu iQksjsafld esfMflu¸

Mh,iQ,e

(;g 1990 esa vFkok mlds ckn ,l,e,l esfMdy dkyst] t;iqj esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs

fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa ¶jktLFkku fo'ofo|ky;¸ }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rk izkIr

fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶MkDVj vkiQ esfMflu¸ (fiQft;ksyksth)

,eMh (fiQft;ksyksth)

(;g 1969 esa vFkok mlds ckn ,l-ih- esfMdy dkyst] chdkusj esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs

fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa ¶jktLFkku fo'ofo|ky;¸ }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr

fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

(xx) ¶ ekU;rk izkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk¸ 'kh"kZd ¹blds ckn dkye (2) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº ds vUrxZr ¶Mk- ,ethvkj fpfdRlk

fo'ofo|ky;] pSUubZ] rfeyukMq¸ ds izfr iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr :i ¹blds ckn dkye (3) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº 'kh"kZd ds varxZr

vafre izfof"V ,oa mlls lacf/r izfof"V ds ckn fuEufyf[kr var£o"V fd;k tk,xk] uker %µ

¶ekLVj vkWiQ ltZjh¸ (b,uVh)

,e ,l (b,uVh)

(;g ekpZ] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn ratkoqj esfMdy dkyst] ratkoqj] rfeyukMq esa

izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa Mk-,ethvkj fpfdRlk fo'ofo|ky;] psUubZ

}kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rk izkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶MWkDVj vkWiQ esfMflu¸ (iSFkksykth)

,e Mh (iSFkksykth)

(;g ekpZ@vizSy] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn dks;EcVwj esfMdy dkyst] rfeyukMq esa

izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa Mk- ,ethvkj fpfdRlk fo'ofo|ky;] psUubZ

}kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶ekLVj vkWiQ ltZjh¸ (b,uVh)

,e ,l (b,uVh)

(;g ekpZ] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn dks;EcVwj] esfMdy dksyt] dks;EcVwj] rfeyukMq

esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa Mk-,ethvkj fpfdRlk fo'ofo|ky;] psUubZ

}kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶MkWDVj vkWiQ esfMflu¸(,usLFkhfl;k)

,e Mh (,usLFkhfl;k)

(;g ekpZ] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn fr:usyosyh esfMdy dkyst] fr:usyosyh] rfeyukMq

esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa Mk- ,ethvkj esfMdy ;wfuo£lVh] psUubZ

}kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

(2)

(3)

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

987

¶ekLVj vkWiQ ltjh¸ (vkÝFkkyeksyksth)

,e ,l (vkÝFkkyeksyksth)

(;g ekpZ] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn fr:usyosyh esfMdy dkyst] fr:usyosyh rfeyukMq

esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa Mk- ,ethvkj fpfdRlk fo'ofo|ky;] psUubZ

}kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶ekLVj vkWiQ ltZjh¸ (vkFkksZisfMd)

,e ,l (vkFkksZisfMd)

(;g vizSy] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn fr:usyosyh esfMdy dkyst] fr:usyosyh rfeyukMq

esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa Mk- ,ethvkj fpfdRlk fo'ofo|ky;] psUubZ

}kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶MWkDVj vkWiQ esfMflu¸ (U;wjksykth)

,e Mh (U;wjksykth)

(;g vxLr] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn fr:usyosyh esfMdy dkyst] fr:usyosyh

rfeyukMq esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa Mk- ,ethvkj fpfdRlk fo'ofo|ky;]

psUubZ }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

(//) ¶ekU;rk izkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk¸ 'kh"kZd ¹blds ckn dkye (2) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº ds vUrxZr ¶vyhx<+ eqfLye

fo'ofo|ky;] mÙkj izns'k¸ ds izfr iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr :i ¹blds ckn dkye (3) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº 'kh"kZd ds varxZr vafre

izfof"V ,oa mlls lacaf/r izfof"V ds ckn fuEufyf[kr dks var£o"V fd;k tk,xk] uker %µ

¶MWkDVj vkWiQ esfMflu¸ (lkbdsVªh)

,e Mh (lkbdsVªh)

(;g twu] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn ts-,y-,u- esfMdy dkyst] vyhx<+] mÙkj izns'k esa

izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa ¶vyhx<+ eqfLye fo'ofo|ky;] mÙkj izns'k¸

}kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

(M+M+) ¶ekU;rk izkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk¸ 'kh"kZd ¹blds ckn dkye (2) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº ds vUrxZr ¶bykgkckn fo'ofo|ky;]

mÙkj izns'k¸ ds izfr iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr :i ¹blds ckn dkye (3) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº 'kh"kZd ds varxZr vafre izfof"V ,oa mlls

lacaf/r izfof"V ds ckn fuEufyf[kr dks var£o"V fd;k tk,xk] uker %µ

¶MkDVj vkWiQ esfMflu¸ (VÔwcjdqyksfll ,aM

,e Mh (VÔwcjdqyksfll ,aM fjfLisjsVjh@psLV fMtht)

fjfLisjsVjh@psLV fMtht)

(;g 1978 esa vFkok mlds ckn ,e-,y-,u- esfMdy dkyst] bykgkckn+] mÙkj izns'k esa

izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa ¶bykgkckn fo'ofo|ky;] mÙkj izns'k¸ }kjk

LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rk izkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

(pp) ¶ ekU;rk izkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk¸ 'kh"kZd ¹blds ckn dkye (2) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº ds vUrxZr ¶N=kifr 'kkgwth egkjkt

fo'ofo|ky;] y[kumQ] mÙkj izns'k¸ ds izfr iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr :i ¹blds ckn dkye (3) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº 'kh"kZd ds varxZr

vafre izfof"V ,oa mlls lacaf/r izfof"V ds ckn fuEufyf[kr dks var£o"V fd;k tk,xk] uker %µ

¶MkDVj vkWiQ esfMflu¸ (V;wcjdqyksfjl ,aM)

,eMh(VÔwcjdqyksfll ,aM fjLisjsVjh@psLV fMtht)

fjLisjsVjh@psLV fMtht)

(;g twu 1978 esa vFkok mlds ckn ,e-,y-,u- esfMdy dkyst] bykgkckn m©Ùkj izns'k esa

izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa ¶N=kifr 'kkgwth egkjkt fo'ofo|ky;]

y[kumQ¸ mÙkj izns'k }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

(2)

(3)

988

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(NN) ¶ekU;rk izkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk¸ 'kh"kZd ¹blds ckn dkye (2) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº ds varxZr ¶MkW- vkj ,e ,y vo/

fo'ofo|ky;] mÙkj izns'k¸ ds izfr iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr :i ¹blds ckn dkye (3) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº 'kh"kZd ds varxZr vafre

izfof"V ,oa mlls lacaf/r izfof"V ds ckn fuEufyf[kr dks var£o"V fd;k tk,xk] uker%µ

¶ekLVj vkWiQ ltZjh¸ (tujy ltZjh)

,e ,l (tujy ltZjh)

(;g twu] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn bjk y[kumQ esfMdy dkyst] y[kumQ] mÙkj izns'k esa

izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa ¶Mk- vkj-,e-,y- vo/ fo'ofo|ky;] mÙkj

izns'k¸ }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶MkDVj vkWiQ esfMflu¸ (dE;qfuVh esfMflu) ,e Mh (dE;qfuVh esfMflu)

(;g twu] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn bjk y[kumQ esfMdy dkyst] y[kumQ] mÙkj izns'k

esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa ¶Mk- vkj-,e-,y- vo/ fo'ofo|ky;] mÙkj

izns'k¸ }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶MkDVj vkWiQ esfMflu¸ (iQkekZdksyksth)

,eMh (iQkekZdksyksth)

(;g tqykbZ] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn bjk y[kumQ esfMdy dkyst] y[kumQ] mÙkj izns'k

esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa ¶Mk-vkj-,e-,y-vo/ fo'ofo|ky;] mÙkj

izns'k¸ }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rk izkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

¶MkDVj vkWiQ esfMflu¸ (,usLFkhfl;k)

,eMh (,usLFkhfl;k)

(;g twu] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn bjk y[kumQ esfMdy dkyst] y[kumQ] mÙkj izns'k

esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa ¶Mk-vkj-,e-,y- vo/ fo'ofo|ky;] mÙkj

izns'k¸ }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rk izkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

(tt) ¶ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk¸ 'kh"kZd ds varxZr ¹blds ckn dkye (2) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº if'pe caxky LokLF;

foKku fo'ofo|ky;] dksydkrk ds izfr ¶iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr :i¸ ¹blds ckn dkWye (3) ds :i esa fu£n"Vº 'kh"kZd ds varxZr

vafre izfof"V ,ao mlls lacaf/r izfof"V ds ckn fuEufyf[kr dks var£o"V fd;k tk,xk] uker %µ

¶ekLVj vkWiQ ltZjh@MkDVj vkWiQ esfMflu

,e ,l@,eMh (vkschth)

(vkschth)¸

(;g twu@tqykbZ] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn cnZoku esfMdy dkyst] cnZoku] if'pe

caxky esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa nh osLV caxky ;wfuoZflVh vkWiQ gsYFk

lkbalsl] dksydkrk }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh) A

^^ekLVj vkWiQ ltZjh (vkFkksZisfMDl)**

,e ,l (vkFkksZisfMDl)

(;g ebZ] 2010 esa vFkok mlds ckn dydÙkk us'kuy esfMdy dkWyst] dksydkrk] if'pe

caxky esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa nh osLV caxky ;wfuoZflVh vkWiQ gsYFk

lkblsat] dksydkrk }kjk LohÑr fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh A

lHkh ds fy, fVIi.kh %

fdlh LukrdksÙkj ikBÔØe dks ,slh iznku dh xbZ ekU;rk dh vf/dre vof/ 5 o"kZ ds fy, gksxh

ftlds mijkar bldk uohdj.k djkuk gksxk A

mi /kjk 4 esa vko';drk vuq:i le; ij ekU;rk dk uohdj.k u gksus ds ifj.kkeLo:i lacaf/r

LukrdksÙkj ikBÔØe esa vfuok;Z :i ls izos'k can gks tk,xk A

¹la- ;w- 12012@180@2010&,ebZ(ih II)º

vuhrk f=kikBh] voj lfpo

(2)

(3)

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

989

New Delhi, the 1st December, 2010

S.O. 360.— In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of the section 11 of the Indian Medical Council

Act, 1956 (102 of 1956), the Central Government, after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby makes the following

further amendments in the first Schedule to the said Act, due to change of nomenclature of the qualification namely:—

In the said Schedule-

(a) against ‘‘Sri Venkateswara Institute of Medical Scinences (Deemed University ), Andhra Pradesh’’ under the

heading ‘Recognised Medical Qualification ’ [hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entray relating

thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation for Registration’ [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be

inserted, namely:—

(2)

(3)

‘‘Doctor of Medicine (Emdorcrinology)”

DM (Endorcrinology)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by

SriVenkateswara Institute of Medical Sciences(Deemed University), Andhra

Pradesh in respect of students being trained at Sri Venkateswara Institute of

Medical Sciences,Andhra Pradesh on or after July, 2010.)

(b) against ‘‘Nizam’s Institute of Medical Sciences (Deemed University), Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh” under the

heading ‘Recognised Medical Qualification’ [ hereinafter referred to as column (2)] , after the last entry and entry relating

thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation for Registration’ [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be

inserted, namely:—

‘‘Doctor of Medicine (Rheumatology)”

DM (Rheumatology)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Nizam’s

Institute of Medical Sciences/Deemed University), Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh

in respect of students being trained at Nizam’s Institute of Medical Sciences,

Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh on or after July, 2010.)

referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation for Registration’

[hereinafter referred to as column(3)], the following shall be inserted, namely:—

‘‘Master of Surgery (Ophthalmology)”

M S (Ophthalmology)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Osmania

University, Hyderabad in respect of the students being trained at Kakatiya

Medical College, Warangal, Andhra Pradesh on or after 1975.)

(d) against ‘‘Kakatiya University, Andhra Pradesh” under the heading ‘Recognised Medical Qualification’ [here-

inafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation for

Registration’ [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely:—

‘‘Master of Surgery (Ophthalmology)”

MS (Ophthalmology)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Kakatiya

University, Andhra Pradesh in respect of students being trained at Kakatiya

Medical College,Warangal, Andhra Pradesh on or after 1975.)

(e) against ‘‘Andhra Pradesh University of Health Sciences, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh’ under the heading

‘Recognised Medical Qualification’ [hereinafter referred to as column (20)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto

under the heading ‘Abbreviation for Registration’ [hereinafter referred to as column (30)], the following shall be inserted,

namely:—

‘‘Master of Surgery (Ophthalmology)”

M S (Ophthalmology)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Andhra Pradesh

University of Health Scoences, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh in respect of the

students being trained at Kakatiya Medical College, Warangal, Andhra Pradesh

on or after 1975.)

(f) against ‘‘Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences, Vijayawada” under the heading ‘Recognised Medical Qualifi-

cation’ [hereinafter referred to as column(2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation

for Registration’ [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely:—

990

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

‘‘Master of Surgery (Ophthalmology)”

M S (Ophthalmology)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Dr. NTR

University of Health Sciences,Vijayawada in respect of the students being trained

at Kakatiya Medical College, Warangal, Andhra Pradesh on or after 1975.)

‘‘Doctor of Medicine (Dermatology,

M D (DVL)

Venerology & Leprosy)”

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Dr. NTR

University of Health Sciences, Vijayawada in respect of the students being

trained at Deccan College of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh on

or after May, 2010.)

‘‘Diploma in Child Health”

DCH

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Dr. NTR

University of Health Sciences, Vijayawada in respect of the students being

trained at S.V.S. Medical College, Mahabubnagar, Andhra Pradesh on or after

May, 2010.)

(g) against ‘‘B.N. Mandal University, Bihar” under the heading ‘Recognised Medical Qualifiaction’ [hereinafter

referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation for Registration’

[hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely:—

‘‘Diploma in Obstetrics & Gynaecology” DGO

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by B.N. Mandal

University, Bihar in respect of the students being trained at Mata Gujri Medical

College, Kishanganj, Bihar on or after March, 2010.)

(h) against ‘‘Ranchi University, Jharkhand” under the heading ‘Recognised Medical Qualification’ [hereinafter

referred to as column (2)], after the last entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation for Registration’ [hereinafter

referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely:—

‘‘Diploma in Clinical Pathology”

DCP

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Ranchi

University, Jharkhand in respect of the students being trained at Rajendra

Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi on or after 1979.)

‘‘Diploma in Orthopaedics”

D. Ortho.

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Ranchi

University, Jharkhand in respect of the students being trained at Rajendra

Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi on or after 1981.)

(i) against ‘‘Bhavnagar University, Bhavnagar, Gujarat” under the heading ‘Recognised Medical Qualification’

[hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation for

Registration’ [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely:—

‘‘Master of Surgery (Orthopaedics)”

M S (Ortho.)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Bhavnagar

University Bhavnagar, Gujarat in respect of the students being trained at Govt.

Medical College, Bhavnagar, Gujarat on or after April, 2010.)

‘‘Doctor of Medicine (Physiology)”

M D (Physiology)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Bhavnagar

University, Bhavnagar, Gujarat in respect of the students being trained at Govt.

Medical College, Bhavnagar, Gujarat on or after March, 2010.)

‘‘Doctor of Medicine (Forensic Medicine)” M D (Forensic Medicine)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Bhavnagar

University, Bhavnagar, Gujarat in respect of the students being trained at Govt.

Medical College, Bhavnagar, Gujarat on or after March, 2010.)

( 2)

( 3)

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

991

‘‘Doctor of Medicine (Microbiology)”

M D (Microbiology)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Bhavnagar

University, Bhavnagar, Gujarat in respect of the students being trained at Govt.

Medical College, Bhavnagar, Gujarat on or after March, 2010.)

‘‘Doctor of Medicine (Tuberculosis &

M D (TB & Chest/Respiratory Diseases)

Chest/Respiratory Diseases)”

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Bhavnagar

University, Bhavnagar, Gujarat in respect of the students being trained at Govt.

Medical College, Bhavnagar, Gujarat on or after April, 2010.)

‘‘Diploma in Tuberculosis &

DTCD

Chest Diseases”

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Bhavnagar

University, Bhavnagar, Gujarat in respect of the students being trained at Govt.

Medical College, Bhavnagar, Gujarat on or after April, 2010.)

‘‘Diploma in Child Health”

DCH

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Bhavnagar

University, Bhavnagar, Gujarat in respect of the students being trained at Govt.

Medical College, Bhavnagar, Gujarat on or after April, 2010.)

‘‘Diploma in Obstetrics & Gynaecology” DGO

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Bhavnagar

University, Bhavnagar, Gujarat in respect of the students being trained at Govt.

Medical College, Bhavnagar, Gujarat on or after April, 2010.)

‘‘Diploma in Clinical Pathology”

DCP

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Bhavnagar

University, Bhavnagar, Gujarat in respect of the students being trained at Govt.

Medical College, Bhavnagar, Gujarat on or after April, 2010.)

(oo) against ‘‘Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Coimbatore” under the heading ‘Recognised Medical Qualification’

[hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation for

Registration’ [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely:—

‘‘Doctor of Medicine (Paediatrics)”

MD (Paediatrics)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Amrita

Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Coimbatore in respect of the students being trained at

Amrita School of Medicine, Kochi on or after June, 2010.)

(k) against ‘‘Kannur University, Kerala” under the heading ‘Recognised Medical Qualification’ [hereinafter re-

ferred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation for Registration’

[hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely :—

‘‘Doctor of Medicine (Paediatrics)”

MD (Paediatrics)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Kannur

University, Kerala in respect of Students being trained at Academy of Medical

Sciences, Pariyaram, Kannur, Kerala on or after March, 2010.)

(l) against ‘‘University of Calicut, Kerala ” under the heading ‘Recognised Medical Qualification’[hereinafter

referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation for Registration’

[hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely :—

‘‘Master of Surgery (Ophthalmology)”

MS (Ophth.)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by University of

Calicut, Kerala in respect of students being trained at Govt. Medical College, Thrissur,

Kerala on or after June, 2010.)

( 2)

( 3)

992

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

‘‘Doctor of Medicine (Psychiatry)”

MD (Psychiatry)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by University

of Calicut, Kerala in respect of students being trained at Govt. Medical College,

Thrissur, Kerala on or after June, 2010).

‘‘Doctor of Medicine (Radio Diagnosis)” MD Radio Diagnosis)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by University

of Calicut, Kerala in respect of students being trained at Govt. Medical College,

Thrissur, Kerala on or after November, 2000).

‘‘Doctor of Medicine (Paediatrics)”

MD (Paediatrics)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by University of

Calicut, Kerala in respect of students being trained at Govt. Medical College,

Thrissur, Kerala on or after June, 2010).

(m) against ‘‘Kerala University, Kerala” under the heading ‘Recognised Medical Qualification’ [hereinafter referred

to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation for Registration’ [herein-

after referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely:—

‘‘Diploma in Clinical Pathology”

DCP

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Kerala Uni-

versity, Kerala in respect of students being trained at Govt. Medical College,

Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala on or after 1963).

(n) against ‘‘Kuvempu University” under the heading ‘Recognised Medical Qualification’ [hereinafter referred to

as column(2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation for Registration’[hereinafter

referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely:—

‘‘Doctor of Medicine (Forensic Medicine)” MD (Forensic Medicine)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Kuvempu

University in respect of students being trained at J.J.M. Medical College ,

Davangere, Karnataka on or after 2002).

‘‘Diploma in Medical Radio Diagnosis ”

DMRD

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Kuvempu

University in respect of students being trained at J.J.M. Medical College,

Davangere, Karnataka on or after 1979).

(o) against ‘‘Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Bangalore” under the heading ‘Recognised Medical

Qualification’ [hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading

‘Abbreviation for Registration’ [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely:—

‘‘Doctor of Medicine (Forensic Medicine)” MD (Forensic Medicine)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Rajiv Gandhi

University of Health Sciences, Bangalore in respect of students being trained at

J.J.M. Medical College, Davangere, Karnataka on or after 2002).

‘‘Diploma in Medical Radio Diagnosis”

DMRD

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Rajiv Gandhi

University of Health Sciences, Bangalore in respect of students being trained at

J.J.M. Medical College , Davangere, Karnataka on or after 1979).

‘‘Doctor of Medicine (Pathology)”

MD (Pathology)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Rajiv Gandhi

University of Health Sciences,Bangalore in respect of the students being trained

at Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences & Research, Bangalore on or after June,

2010).

( 2)

( 3)

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

993

‘‘Doctor of Medicine (Neurology)”

DM (Neurology)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Rajiv Gandhi

University of Health Sciences,Bangalore in respect of students being trained at

M.S. Ramaiah Medical College, Bangalore on or after July, 2010).

‘‘Doctor of Medicine/Master of Surgery

MD/MS (Anatomy)

(Anatomy)”

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Rajiv Gandhi

University of Health Sciences,Bangalore in respect of students being trained at

Sri Siddhartha Medical College, Tumkur, Karnataka on or after July, 2010).

‘‘Doctor of Medicine (Physiology)”

MD (Physiology)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Rajiv Gandhi

University of Health Sciences, Bangalore in respect of students being trained at

Sri Siddhartha Medical College, Tumkur, Karnataka on or after June, 2010).

‘‘Doctor of Medicine (Tuberculosis &

DM (TB & Resp. Disease/Pulmo. Medicine)

Respiratory Diseases/Pulmonary Medicine)”

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Rajiv Gandhi

University of Health Sciences,Bangalore in respect of students being trained at

Yenepoya Medical College, Mangalore, Karnataka on or after May, 2010).

‘‘Doctor of Medicine (Radio Diagnosis)”

MD (Radio Diagnosis)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Rajiv Gandhi

University of Health Sciences, Bangalore in respect of students being trained at

Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangalore Karnataka on or after

June, 2010).

‘‘Diploma in Anaesthesia”

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Rajiv Gandhi

University of Health Sciences,Bangalore in respect of students being trained at

M.V.J. Medical College, Bangalore, Karnataka on or after May, 2010).

(p) against ‘‘Poona University” under the heading ‘Recognised Medical Qualification’ [hereinafter referred to as

column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation for Registration’ [hereinafter

referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely :—

‘‘Doctor of Medicine (Physiology)”

DM (Physiology)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Poona

University in respect of students being trained at Rural Medical College, Loni,

Maharashtra on or after 1994).

(q) against ‘‘Pravara Institute of Medical Sciences (Deemed University), Loni” under the heading ‘Recognised

Medical Qualification’ [hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the

heading ‘Abbreviation for Registration’ hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely :—

‘‘Doctor of Medicine (Physiology)”

MD (Physiology)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Pravara

Institute of Medical Sciences (Deemed University), Loni in respect of

students being trained at Rural Medical College, Loni, Maharashtra on or after 1994).

‘‘Master of Surgery (ENT)”

MS (ENT)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Pravara

Institute of Medical Sciences (Deemed University), Loni in respect of students

being trained at Rural Medical College, Loni, Maharashtra on or after June, 2010).

‘‘Diploma in Otolaryngology”

DLO

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Pravara

Institute of Medical Sciences (Deemed University). Loni in respect of students

being trained at Rural Medical College, Loni, Maharashtra on or after June,

2010).

( 2)

( 3)

994

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(r) against ‘‘Nagpur University” under the heading ‘Recognised Medical Qualification’ [hereinafter referred to as

column (2)] after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation for Registration’ [hereinafter

referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely :—

‘‘Diploma in Public Health”

DPH

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Nagpur

University in respect of students being trained at Govt. Medical College, Nagpur,

Maharashtra on or after 1982).

(s) against ‘‘RTM Nagpur University” under the heading ‘Recognised Medical Qualification’ [hereinafter referred

to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation for Registration’ [herein-

after referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely :—

‘‘Diploma in Public Health”

DPH

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by RTM Nagpur

University in respect of students being trained at Govt. Medical College, Nagpur,

Maharashtra on or after 1982).

(t) against ‘‘Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, Nashik” under the heading ‘Recognised Medical Quali-

fication’ [hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbrevia-

tion for Registration’ [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted namely :—

‘‘Diploma in Public Health”

DPH

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Maharashtra

University of Health Sciences, Nashik in respect of students being trained at

Govt. Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra on or after 1982).

‘‘Doctor of Medicine (Nephrology)”

DM (Nephrology)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Maharashtra

University of Health Sciences, Nashik in respect of students being trained at

Bombay Hospital Institute of Medical Sciences, Mumbai on or after 1993).

‘‘Doctor of Medicine (Forensic Medicine)”

MD (Forensic Medicine))

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Maharashtra

University of Health Sciences, Nashik in respect of students being trained at

T.N. Medical College, Mumbai on or after 1995).

‘‘Diploma in Forensic Medicine”

DFM

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Maharashtra

University of Health Sciences, Nashik in respect of students being trained at

T.N. Medical College, Mumbai on or after 1986).

‘‘Diploma in Child Health”

DCH

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Maharashtra

University of Health Sciences, Nashik in respect of students being trained at

T.N. Medical College, Mumbai on or after June,1996).

‘‘Magistrar of Chirurgiae (Neuro Surgery)”

M.Ch. (Neuro Surgery)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Maharashtra

University of Health Sciences, Nashik in respect of students being trained at

L.T.M. Medical College, Mumbai on or after January, 1989).

‘‘Master of Surgery (ENT)”

MS (ENT)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Maharashtra

University of Health Sciences, Nashik in respect of students being trained at

Sanjeevan Medical Foundation ENT PG Training Institute, Miraj, Maharashtra

on or after 1993).

‘‘Diploma in Otolaryngology”

DLO

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Maharashtra

University of Health Sciences, Nashik in respect of students being trained at

( 2)

( 3)

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

995

Sanjeevan Medical Foundation, ENT PG Training Institute, Miraj, Maharashtra

on or after 1992.)

‘‘Doctor of Medicine (Pathology)”

MD (Pathology)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Maharashtra

University of Health Sciences, Nashik in respect of the students being trained at

Maharashtra Institute of Medical Sciences & Research, Latur, Maharashtra on

or after July, 2010.)

‘‘Master of Surgery (Ophthalmology)”

MS (Ophthalmology)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Maharashtra

University of Health Sciences, Nashik in respect of the students being trained at

Maharashtra Institute of Medical Sciences & Research, Latur,Maharashtra on

or after June, 2010.)

‘‘Master of Surgery (ENT)”

MS (ENT)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Maharashtra

University of Health Sciences, Nashik in respect of the students being trained at

NKP Salve Institute of Medical Sciences & Research Centre, Nagpur, Maharashtra

on or after July, 2010.)

‘‘Master of Surgery (Ophthalmology)”

MS (Ophthalmology)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Maharashtra

University of Health Sciences, Nashik in respect of the students being trained at

NKP Salve Institute of Medical, Sciences & Research Centre, Nagpur,

Maharashtra or after June, 2010.)

‘‘Doctor of Medicine (Paediatrics)”

MD (Paediatrics)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Maharashtra

University of Health Sciences, Nashik in respect of the students being trained at

NKP Salve Institute of Medical Sciences & Research Centre,Nagpur, Maharashtra

on or after July, 2010.)

‘‘Doctor of Medicine (General Medicine)”

MD (General Medicine)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Maharashtra

University of Health Sciences, Nashik in respect of the students being trained at

NKP Salve Institute of Medical Sciences & Research Centre,Nagpur, Maharashtra

on or after July, 2010.)

‘‘Doctor of Medicine /Master of Surgery

MD /MS(OBG)

(OBG)”

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Maharashtra

University of Health Sciences, Nashik in respect of the students being trained at

NKP Salve Institute of Medical Sciences & Research Centre,Nagpur, Maharashtra

on or after July, 2010.)

‘‘Doctor of Medicine (Pathology)”

MD (Pathology)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Maharashtra

University of Health Sciences, Nashik in respect of the students being trained at

NKP Salve Institute of Medical Sciences & Research Centre,Nagpur, Maharashtra

on or after July, 2010.)

‘‘Master of Surgery (General Surgery)”

MS (General Surgery)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Maharashtra

University of Health Sciences, Nashik in respect of the students being trained at

NKP Salve Institute of Medical Sciences & Research Centre,Nagpur, Maharashtra

on or after July, 2010.)

‘‘Diploma in Medical Radio Diagnosis”

DMRD

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Maharashtra

University of Health Sciences, Nashik in respect of the students being trained at

NKP Salve Institute of Medical Sciences & Research Centre,Nagpur, Maharashtra

on or after June, 2010.)

( 2)

( 3)

996

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

‘‘Diploma in Dermatology, Venerology

DDVL

& Leprosy”

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Maharashtra

University of Health Sciences, Nashik in respect of the students being trained at

NKP Salve Institute of Medical Sciences & Research Centre,Nagpur, Maharashtra

on or after July, 2010.)

‘‘Master of Surgery (General Surgery)”

MS (General Surgery)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Maharashtra

University of Health Sciences, Nashik in respect of the students being trained at

A.C.P.M. Medical College, Dhule, Maharashtra on or after June, 2010.)

‘‘Master of Surgery/Doctor of Medicine

MS /MD(OBG)

(Obstetrics & Gynaecology)”

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Maharashtra

University of Health Sciences, Nashik in respect of the students being trained at

A.C.P.M. Medical College, Dhule, Maharashtra on or after June, 2010.)

‘‘Doctor of Medicine (General Medicine)” MD (General Medicine)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Maharashtra

University of Health Sciences, Nashik in respect of the students being trained at

A.C.P.M. Medical College, Dhule, Maharashtra on or after June, 2010.)

‘‘Doctor of Medicine (Pathology)”

MD (Pathology)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Maharashtra

University of Health Sciences, Nashik in respect of the students being trained at

A.C.P.M. Medical College, Dhule, Maharashtra on or after June, 2010.)

(u) against ‘‘Bombay/Mumbai University” under the heading ‘Recognised Medical Qualification’ [hereinafter

referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation for Registration’

[hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely:—

‘‘Doctor of Medicine (Nephrology)”

DM (Nephrology)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Bombay/

Mumbai University in respect of the students being trained at Bombay Hospital

Institute of Medical Sciences, Mumbai on or after 1993.)

‘‘Doctor of Medicine (Forensic Medicine)”

MD (Forensic Medicine)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Bombay/

Mumbai University in respect of students being trained at T.N. Medical College,

Mumbai on or after 1995.)

‘‘Diploma in Forensic Medicine”

DFM

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Bombay/

Mumbai University in respect of students being trained at T.N. Medical College,

Mumbai on or after 1986.)

‘‘Diploma in Child Health ”

DCH

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Bombay/

Mumbai University in respect of the students being trained at T.N. Medical

College, Mumbai on or after June, 1996.)

‘‘Magistrar of Chirurgiage (Neuro Surgery)” M.Ch (Neuro Surgery)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Bombay/

Mumbai University in respect of students being trained at L.T.M. Medical

College, Mumbai on or after January, 1999.)

(v) against ‘‘Shivaji University” under the heading ‘Recognised Medical Qualification’ [hereinafter referred to as

column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation for Registration’ [hereinaftter

referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely:—

( 2)

( 3)

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

997

‘‘Master of Surgery (ENT)”

MS (ENT)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Shivaji

University in respect of the students being trained at Sanjeevan Medical Foun-

dation ENT PG Training Institute, Miraj, Maharashtra on or after 1993.)

‘‘Diploma in Otolaryngology”

DLO

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Shivaji

University in respect of the students being trained at Sanjeevan Medical Foun-

dation ENT PG Training Institute, Miraj, Maharashtra on or after 1992.)

(w) against ‘‘Dr. D.Y. Patil University, Kolhapur, Maharashtra” under the heading ‘Recognised Medical Qualifica-

tion’ [hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation

for Registration’ [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely:—

‘‘Doctor of Medicine (Psychiatry)”

MD (Psychiatry)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by D.Y. Patil

University, Kolhapur in respect of students being trained at Dr. D.Y. Patil

Medical College, Kolhapur on or after July, 2010.)

‘‘Doctor of Medicine (Anaesthesia)”

MD (Anaesthesia)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by D.Y. Patil

University, Kolhapur in respect of students being trained at Dr. D.Y. Patil

Medical College, Kolhapur on or after July, 2010.)

‘‘Doctor of Medicine (Microbiology)”

MD (Microbiology)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by D.Y. Patil

University, Kolhapur in respect of students being trained at Dr. D.Y. Patil

Medical College, Kolhapur on or after June, 2010.)

‘‘Master of Surgery (Ophthalmology)”

MS (Ophthalmology)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by D.Y. Patil

University, Kolhapur in respect of students being trained at Dr. D.Y. Patil

Medical College, Kolhapur on or after July, 2010.)

‘‘Diploma in Obstetrics & Gynaecology” DOG

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by D.Y. Patil

University, Kolhapur in respect of students being trained at Dr. D.Y. Patil

Medical College, Kolhapur on or after June, 2010.)

(x) against ‘‘Dr. D.Y. Patil University, Pune” under the heading ‘Recognised Medical Qualification’ [hereinafter

referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation for Registration’

[hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely :—

‘‘Magistrar of Chirurgiae (Neuro Surgery)”

M.Ch (Neuro Surgery)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by D.Y. Patil

University, Pune in respect of students being trained at Dr. D.Y. Patil

Medical College, Pimpri, Pune on or after October, 2009.)

(y) against ‘‘Utkal University, Orissa” under the heading ‘Recognised Medical Qualification’ [hereinafter referred

to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation for Registration’ [herein-

after referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely :—

‘‘Magistrar of Chirurgiae (Paediatric Surgery)” M. Ch (Paediatric Surgery)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Utkal

University, Orissa in respect of students being trained at S.C.B.

Medical College, Cuttack, Orissa on or after July, 2010.)

‘‘Magistrar of Chirurgiae (Plastic Surgery)” M. Ch (Plastic Surgery)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Utkal

University, Orissa in respect of students being trained at S.C.B.

Medical College, Cuttack, Orissa on or after July, 2010.)

( 2)

( 3)

998

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(z) against ‘‘Baba Farid University of Health Sciences, Faridkot, Punjab” under the heading ‘Recognised Medical

Qualification’ [hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading

‘Abbreviation for Registration’ [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely :—

‘‘Doctor of Medicine (Paediatrics )”

MD (Paediatrics)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Baba Farid

University, of Health Sciences, Faridkot, Punjab in respect of students being

trained at Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Medical Sciences & Research, Amritsar

on or after June, 2010.)

‘‘Doctor of Medicine (Radio Diagnosis)”

M.D (Radio Diagnosis)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Baba Farid

University, of Health Sciences, Faridkot,Punjab in respect of students being

trained at Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Medical Sciences & Research, Amritsar

on or after June, 2010.)

‘‘Master of Surgery (Ophthalmology)”

MS(Ophthalmology)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Baba Farid

University, of Health Sciences, Faridkot, Punjab in respect of students being

trained at Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Medical Sciences & Research, Amritsar

on or after June, 2010.)

(aa) against ‘‘Rajasthan University” under the heading ‘Recognised Medical Qualification’ [hereinafter referred to

as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation for Registration’ [hereinafter

referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely :—

‘‘Doctor of Medicine (Pathology)”

MD (Pathology)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Rajasthan

University in respect of students being trained at S.P. Medical College, Bikaner

on or after 1984.)

‘‘Diploma in Child Health”

DCH

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Rajasthan

University in respect of students being trained at S.P. Medical College, Bikaner

on or after April,1969.)

‘‘Diploma in Anaesthesia”

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Rajasthan

University in respect of students being trained at R.N.T. Medical College, Udaipur

on or after 1981.)

‘‘Diploma in Forensic Medicine”

DFM

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Rajasthan

University in respect of students being trained at S.M.S. Medical College,

Jaipur on or after 1990.)

‘‘Doctor of Medicine (Physiology)”

MD (Physiology)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Rajasthan

University in respect of students being trained at S.P. Medical College, Bikaner

on or after October, 1969.)

(bb) against ‘‘Rajasthan University of Health Sciences, Jaipur” under the heading ‘Recognised Medical Qualifica-

tion’ [hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation

for Registration’ [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely :—

‘‘Doctor of Medicine (Pathology)”

MD (Pathology)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Rajasthan

University of Health Sciences, Jaipur in respect of students being trained at S.P.

Medical College, Bikaner on or after 1984).

( 2)

( 3)

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

999

‘‘Diploma in Child Health’’

DCH

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Rajasthan

University of Health Sciences, Jaipur in respect of students being trained at S.P.

Medical College, Bikaner on or after April, 1969).

‘‘Diploma in Anaesthesia’’

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Rajasthan

University of Health Sciences, Jaipur in respect of students being trained at

R.N.T Medical College, Udaipur on or after 1981).

‘‘Diploma in Forensic Medicine’’

DFM

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Rajasthan

University of Health Sciences, Jaipur in respect of students being trained at

S.M.S. Medical College, Jaipur on or after 1990).

‘‘Doctor of Medicine (Physiology)’’

MD (Physiology)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Rajasthan

University of Health Sciences, Jaipur in respect of students being trained at S.P.

Medical College, Bikaner on or after October, 1969).

(cc) against ‘‘Tamilnadu Dr. MGR Medical University Chennai’’ under the heading ‘Recognised Medical Qualifica-

tion’ [hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation

for Registration’ [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely :—

‘‘Master of Surgery (ENT)”

M S (ENT)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by The Tamilnadu

Dr. MGR Medical University, Chennai in respect of the students being trained

at Thanjavur, Medical College, Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu on or after March, 2010).

‘‘Doctor of Medicine (Pathology)’’

MD (Pathology)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by The Tamilnadu

Dr. MGR Medical University, Chennai in respect of the students being trained

at Coimbatore, Medical College, Coimbator, Tamil Nadu on or after March/April,

2010).

‘‘Master of Surgery (ENT)’’

MS (ENT)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by The Tamilnadu

Dr. MGR Medical University, Chennai in respect of the students being trained

at Coimbatore, Medical College, Coimbator, Tamil Nadu on or after March, 2010).

‘‘Doctor of Medicine (Anaesthesia)’’

MD (Anaesthesia)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by The Tamilnadu

Dr. MGR Medical University, Chennai in respect of the students being trained

at Tirunelveli Medical College, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu on or after March, 2010).

‘‘Master of Surgery (Ophthalmology)’’

MS (Ophthalmology)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by The Tamilnadu

Dr. MGR Medical University, Chennai in respect of the students being trained

atTirunelveli Medical College, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu on or after March, 2010).

‘‘Master of Surgery (Orthopaedics)’’

MS (Orthopaedics)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by The Tamilnadu

Dr. MGR Medical University, Chennai in respect of the students being trained

atTirunelveli Medical College, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu on or after April, 2010).

‘‘Doctor of Medicine (Neurology)’’

DM (Neurology)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by The Tamilnadu

Dr. MGR Medical University, Chennai in respect of the students being trained

atTirunelveli Medical College, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu on or after August, 2010).

( 2)

( 3)

1000

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(dd) against ‘‘Aligarh Muslim University, Uttar Pradesh’’under the heading ‘Recognised Medical Qualification’

[hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation for

Registration’ [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely :—

‘‘Doctor of Medicine ( Psychiatry)’’

MD (Psychiatry)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by The Aligarh

Muslim University,Uttar Pradesh in respect of the students being trained at

J.L.N. Medical College, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh on or after June, 2010).

(ee) against ‘‘Allahabad University, Uttar Pradesh’’under the heading ‘Recognised Medical Qualification’ [herein-

after referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation for Registra-

tion’ [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely :—

‘‘Doctor of Medicine ( Tuberculosis &

MD (TB & Resp./Chest Diseases)

Respiratory/Chest Diseases)’’

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by

Allahabad University, Uttar Pradesh in respect of the students being trained at

M.L.N. Medical College, Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh on or after 1978).

(ff) against ‘‘Chhatrapati Shahuji Maharaj Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh’’under the heading

‘Recognised Medical Qualification’ [hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto

under the heading ‘Abbreviation for Registration’ [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted,

namely :—

‘‘Doctor of Medicine ( Tuberculosis &

MD (TB & Resp./Chest Diseases)

Respiratory/Chest Diseases)’’

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by

Chhatrapati Shahuji Maharaj Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh in

respect of students being trained at M.L.N. Medical College, Allahabad, Uttar

Pradesh on or after, 1979).

(gg) against ‘‘Dr. R.M.L. Avadh University, Faizabad, Uttar Pradesh’’under the heading ‘Recognised Medical

Qualification’ [hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading

‘Abbreviation for Registration’ [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely :—

‘‘Master of Surgery (General Surgery)’’

MS (General Surgery)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Dr. R.M.L.

Avadh University, Faizabad, Uttar Pradesh in respect of the students being

trained at Era’s Lucknow Medical College, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh on or after

June, 2010).

‘‘Doctor of Medicine (Community

MD (Community Medicine)

Medicine’’

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Dr. R.M.L.

Avadh University, Faizabad, Uttar Pradesh in respect of the students being

trained at Era’s Lucknow Medical College, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh on or after

June, 2010.

‘‘Doctor of Medicine (Pharmacology)’’

MD (Pharmacology)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Dr. R.M.L.

Avadh University, Faizabad, Uttar Pradesh in respect of the students being

trained at Era’s Lucknow Medical College, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh on or after

July, 2010).

‘‘Doctor of Medicine (Anaesthesia)’’

MD (Anaesthesia)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Dr. R.M.L.

Avadh University, Faizabad, Uttar Pradesh in respect of the students being

trained at Era’s Lucknow Medical College, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh on or after

June, 2010).

(hh) against ‘‘West Bengal University of Health Sciences, Kolkata’’under the heading ‘Recognised Medical

Qualification’ [hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading

‘Abbreviation for Registration’ [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely :—

‘‘Master of Surgery/Doctor of Medicine

MS/MD (OBG)

(OBG)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by The West

Bengal University of Health Sciences, Kolkata in respect of the students

being trained at Burdwan Medical College, Burdwan, West Bengal on or after

June/July, 2010).

( 2)

( 3)

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

1001

‘‘Master of Surgery (Orthopaedics)’’

MS (Orthopaedics)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by The West

Bengal University of Health Sciences, Kolkata in respect of the students being

trained at Calcutta National Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal on or after

May, 2010.)

Note to all :

1. The recognition so granted to a Postgraduate Course shall be for a maximum period of 5 years, upon

which it shall have to be renewed.

2. Failure to seek timely renewal of recognition as required in sub-clause-4 shall invariably result in stop-

page of admissions to the concerned Postgraduate Course.

[No. U. 12012/180/2010-ME-(P. II)]

ANITA TRIPATHI, Under Secy.

ubZ fnYyh] 3 fnlEcj] 2010

dk-vk- 361-—dsUæ ljdkj] nar fpfdRlk vf/fu;e] 1948 (1948 dk 16) dh /kjk (10) dh mi&/kjk (2) }kjk iznÙk

'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, Hkkjrh; nar fpfdRlk ifj"kn~ ls ijke'kZ djds] mDr vf/fu;e ds vuqlwph ds Hkkx&1 esa fuEufyf[kr la'kks/u

djrh gS] uker% %—

2- egkjk"Vª LokLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky;] ukfld }kjk iznku dh tk jgh nar fpfdRlk fMfxz;ksa dks ekU;rk nsus ds ckjs esa nar fpfdRlk

vf/fu;e] 1948 (1948 dk 16) dh vuqlwph ds Hkkx&I ds laca/ esa Øe la[;k 60 ds lkeus dkWye 2 rFkk 3 dh ekStwnk izfof"V;ksa esa blds

i'pkr~ fuEufyf[kr izfof"V;ksa dks var£o"V fd;k tk,xk %—

XII- N=kifr lkgw egkjkt f'k{k.k laLFkk] nar fpfdRlk egkfo|ky; vkSj vLirky] vkSjaxkckn

^^nar fpfdRlk ltZjh esa ekLVj

isfjvksMksaVksykWth

,e Mh ,l (isfj-)]

(;fn fnukad 8&7&2010 dks ;k mlds ckn iznku dh xbZA)

egkjk"Vª LOkkLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky;] ukfld] egkjk"Vª

vksjy ,aM esfDlyksiQsfl;y ltZjh

,e Mh ,l (vksjy ,aM esfDlyksiQsfl;y ltZjh)]

(;fn fnukad 3&7&2010 dks ;k mlds ckn iznku dh xbZA)

egkjk"Vª LOkkLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky;] ukfld

vksFkksZMksufVDl ,oa MsaVksiQsfl;y vkFkksZisfMDl]

,e Mh ,l (vksFkksZMksufVDl ,oa MsaVksiQsfl;y vkFkksZisfMDl)]

(;fn fnukad 25&6&2010 dks ;k mlds ckn iznku dh xbZA)

egkjk"Vª LOkkLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky;] ukfld A**

¹la- oh- 12017@41@2006&Mh bZº

vfurk f=kikBh] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 3rd December, 2010

S.O. 361.— In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of Section 10 of the Dentists Act, 1948 (16 of

1948), the Central Government, after consultation with Dental Council of India, hereby, makes the following amendments

in Part-I of the Schedule to the said Act, namely :—

2. In the existing entries of column 2 & 3 against Serial No.60, in Part-I of the Schedule to the Dentists Act, 1948

(16 of 1948) pertaining to recognition of dental degrees awarded by Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, Nashik,

Maharashtra, the following entries shall be inserted thereunder :—

‘‘XII

Chhatrapati Shahu Maharaj Shikshah Sanstha’s

Dental College & Hospital, Aurangabad.

Master of Dental Surgery

Periodontology

MDS (Periodontology), Maharashtra University of

( if granted on or after 8-7-2010)

Health Sciences, Nashik, Maharashtra.

Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery

MDS (Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery), Maharashtra

(if granted on or after 3-7-2010)

University of Health Sciences, Nashik.

Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopaedics

MDS (Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopaedics),

(if granted on or after 25-6-2010)

Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, Nashik.’’

[No. V-12017/41/2006-DE]

ANITA TRIPATHI, Under Secy.

( 2)

( 3)

1002

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ubZ fnYyh] 7 fnlEcj] 2010

dk-vk- 362-—dsUæ ljdkj] nar fpfdRlk vf/fu;e] 1948 (1948 dk 16) dh /kjk (10) dh mi&/kjk (2) }kjk iznÙk

'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, Hkkjrh; nar fpfdRlk ifj"kn~ ls ijke'kZ djds] mDr vf/fu;e ds vuqlwph ds Hkkx&1 esa fuEufyf[kr la'kks/u

djrh gS] uker% %—

2- MkW- Mh okbZ ikfVy fo|kihB] fiEijh] iq.ks }kjk iznku dh tk jgh nar fpfdRlk fMfxz;ksa dks ekU;rk nsus ds ckjs esa nar fpfdRlk

vfèkfu;e] 1948 (1948 dk 16) dh vuqlwph ds Hkkx&I esa Øe la[;k 91 ds lkeus dkWye 2 rFkk 3 dh ekStwnk izfof"V;ksa esa blds i'pkr~

fuEufyf[kr izfof"V;ksa dks var£o"V fd;k tk,xk %&

¶MkW Mh okbZ ikfVy nar fpfdRlk egkfo|ky; ,oa vLirky] fiEijh] iq.ks

ekLVj vkWiQ ltZjh

(i) isUMksMksfUVDl ,aM fizosfUVo MsfUVLVªh

,e Mh ,l (isUMksMksfUVDl ,aM fizosfUVo MsfUVLVªh)

(;fn fnukad 12&5&2010 dks ;k mlds ckn iznku dh xbZ gS)

MkW- Mh okbZ ikfVy fo|kihB] fiEijh] iq.ks

(ii) ifCyd gsYFk MsfUVLVªh

,e Mh ,l (ifCyd gsYFk MsfUVLVªh)

(;fn fnukad 13&5&2010 dks ;k mlds ckn iznku dh xbZ gS)

MkW- Mh okbZ ikfVy fo|kihB] fiEijh] iq.ks

(iii) isfj;ksMksUVksyksth

,e Mh ,l (isfj;ksMksUVksyksth)

(;fn fnukad 15&5&2010 dks ;k mlds ckn iznku dh xbZ gS)

MkW- Mh okbZ ikfVy fo|kihB] fiEijh] iq.ks

(iv) vksjy ,aM eSDlhyksiQsfl;y ltZjh

,e Mh ,l (vksjy ,aM eSDlhyksiQsfl;y ltZjh)

(;fn fnukad 20&5&2010 dks ;k mlds ckn iznku dh xbZ gS)

MkW- Mh okbZ ikfVy fo|kihB] fiEijh] iq.ks

(v) dUtosZfVo MsfUVLVªh ,aM baMksMksfUVDl

,e Mh ,l (dUtosZfVo MsfUVLVªh ,aM baMksMksfUVDl)

(;fn fnukad 14&5&2010 dks ;k mlds ckn iznku dh xbZ gS)

MkW- Mh okbZ ikfVy fo|kihB] fiEijh] iq.ks

(vi) izksLFkksMksafVDl ,aM Økmu ,aM fczt

,e Mh ,l (izksLFkksMksafVDl ,aM Økmu ,aM fczt)

(;fn fnukad 21&5&2010 dks ;k mlds ckn iznku dh xbZ gS)

MkW- Mh okbZ ikfVy fo|kihB] fiEijh] iq.ks

(vii) vksFkksZMksafVDl rFkk MsaVksiQsfl;y vksFkksZisfMDl

,e Mh ,l (vksFkksZMksafVDl rFkk MsaVksiQsfl;y

(;fn fnukad 18&5&2010 dks ;k mlds ckn iznku dh xbZ gS)

vksFkksZisfMDl) MkW- Mh okbZ ikfVy fo|kihB] fiEijh] iq.ks

(vii) vksjy esfMflu ,aM jsfM;ksyksth

,e Mh ,l (vksjy esfMflu ,aM jsfM;ksyksth)

(;fn fnukad 19&5&2010 dks ;k mlds ckn iznku dh xbZ gS)

MkW- Mh okbZ ikfVy fo|kihB] fiEijh] iq.ks

(ix) vksjy iSFkksyksth ,aM ekbØks ck;ksyksth

,e Mh ,l (vksjy iSFkksyksth ,aM ekbØks ck;ksyksth)

(;fn fnukad 18&5&2010 dks ;k mlds ckn iznku dh xbZ gS)

MkW- Mh okbZ ikfVy fo|kihB] fiEijh] iq.ks A¸

¹la- oh- 12017@3@2005&Mh bZ ([k.M&1)º

vfurk f=kikBh] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 7th December, 2010

S.O. 362.— In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of Section 10 of the Dentists Act, 1948 (16 of

1948), the Central Government, after consultation with Dental Council of India, hereby, makes the following amendments

in Part-I of the Schedule to the said Act, namely :—

2. In the existing entries of columns 2 & 3 against Serial No. 91, in Part-I of the Schedule to the Dentists Act, 1948

(16 of 1948) pertaining to recognition of dental degrees awarded by Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, the following

entries shall be inserted thereunder :—

‘‘Dr. D.Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital,

Pimpri, Pune

Master of Dental Surgery

(i)

Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry

MDS (Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry),

( granted on or after 12-5-2010)

Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune

(ii)

Public Health Dentistry

MDS (Public Health Dentistry),

( if granted on or after 13-5-2010)

Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

1003

(iii)

Periodontology

MDS (Periodontology),

(if granted on or after 15-5-2010)

Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune

(iv)

Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery

MDS (Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery),

(if granted on or after 20-5-2010)

Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune

(v)

Conservative Dentistry &

MDS

(Conservative Dentistry &

Endodontics

Endodontics),

(if granted on or after 14-5-2010)

Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune

(vi)

Prosthodontics & Crown & Bridge

MDS (Prosthodontics & Crown & Bridge),

(if granted on or after 21-5-2010)

Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune

(vii)

Orthodontics & Dentofacial

MDS (Orthodontics & Dentofacial

Orthopaedics

Orthopaedics),

(if granted on or after 18-5-2010)

Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune

(viii)

Oral Medicine & Radiology

MDS (Oral Medicine & Radiology),

(if granted on or after 19-5-2010)

Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune

(ix)

Oral Pathology & Microbiology

MDS (Oral Pathology & Microbiology),

(if granted on or after 18-5-2010)

Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune.’’

[No. V-12017/3/2005-DE (Vol.I)]

ANITA TRIPATHI, Under Secy.

ubZ fnYyh] 7 fnlEcj] 2010

dk-vk- 363-—dsUæ ljdkj] nar fpfdRlk vf/fu;e] 1948 (1948 dk 16) dh /kjk (10) dh mi&/kjk (2) }kjk iznÙk

'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, Hkkjrh; nar fpfdRlk ifj"kn~ ls ijke'kZ djds] mDr vf/fu;e ds vuqlwph ds Hkkx&1 esa fuEufyf[kr la'kks/u

djrh gS] uker% %—

2- egkjk"Vª LokLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky;] ukfld }kjk iznku dh tk jgh nar fpfdRlk fMfxz;ksa dks ekU;rk nsus ds ckjs esa nar fpfdRlk

vf/fu;e] 1948 (1948 dk 16) dh vuqlwph ds Hkkx&I esa Øe la[;k 60 ds XIV ds lkeus dkWye 2 rFkk 3 dh ekStwnk izfof"V;ksa esa blds

i'pkr~ okbZ-,e-Vh- nar fpfdRlk egkfo|ky; rFkk vLirky] uoh eqacbZ ds laca/ esa fuEufyf[kr izfof"V;ksa dks var£o"V fd;k tk,xk %—

^^nar fpfdRlk ltZjh esa ekLVj

(i) vksjy iSFkksykWth ,aM ekbØksck;ykWth

,e Mh ,l (vksjy iSFkksykWth)]

(;fn fnukad 13&7&2010 dks ;k mlds ckn iznku dh xbZ gksA)

egkjk"Vª LOkkLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky;] ukfld

(ii) datjosfVo MsafVLVªh rFkk baMksMksafVDl

,e Mh ,l (datjosfVo MsafVLVªh)]

(;fn fnukad 25&6&2010 dks ;k mlds ckn iznku dh xbZ gksA)

egkjk"Vª LOkkLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky;] ukfld

(iii) vksjy ,.M esfDlyksiQsfl;y ltZjh

,e Mh ,l (vksjy ltZjh)]

(;fn fnukad 29&6&2010 dks ;k mlds ckn iznku dh xbZ gksA)

egkjk"Vª LOkkLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky;] ukfld

(iv) isfjvksMksaVksykWth

,e Mh ,l (isfjvks-)]

(;fn fnukad 01&7&2010 dks ;k mlds ckn iznku dh xbZ gksA)

egkjk"Vª LOkkLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky;] ukfld

(v) vksFkksZMksufVDl ,oa MsaVksiQsfl;y vkFkksZisfMDl]

,e Mh ,l (vksFkksZ-)]

(;fn fnukad 3&7&2010 dks ;k mlds ckn iznku dh xbZ gksA)

egkjk"Vª LOkkLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky;] ukfld A**

¹la- oh-&12017@4@2005&Mh bZº

vfurk f=kikBh] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 7th December, 2010

S.O. 363.— In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of Section 10 of the Dentists Act, 1948 (16 of

1948), the Central Government, after consultation with the Dental Council of India, hereby, makes the following amendments

in Part-I of the Schedule to the said Act, namely :—

2. In the existing entries of columns 2 & 3 against XIV of Serial No. 60, in respect of Y. M. T. Dental College &

Hospital, Navi Mumbai, in Part-I of the Schedule to the Dentists Act, 1948 (16 of 1948) pertaining to recognition of dental

degrees awarded by Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, Nashik, the following entries shall be inserted thereunder:—

1004

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

‘‘Master of Dental Surgery

(i)

Oral Pathology & Microbiology

MDS (Oral Path.), Maharashtra University of

( if granted on or after 13-7-2010)

Health Sciences, Nashik

(ii)

Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics

MDS (Cons. Dent.), Maharashtra

(if granted on or after 25-6-2010)

University of Health Sciences, Nashik

(iii)

Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery

MDS (Oral Surgery), Maharashtra

(if granted on or after 29-6-2010)

University of Health Sciences, Nashik

(iv)

Periodontology

MDS (Perio), Maharashtra

(if granted on or after 1-07-2010)

University of Health Sciences, Nashik

(v)

Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics

MDS (Ortho.), Maharashtra

(if granted on or after 3-7-2010)

University of Health Sciences, Nashik.’’

[No. V-12017/4/2005-DE]

ANITA TRIPATHI, Under Secy.

ubZ fnYyh] 10 fnlEcj] 2010

dk-vk- 364-—dsUæ ljdkj] nar fpfdRlk vf/fu;e] 1948 (1948 dk 16) dh /kjk (10) dh mi&/kjk (2) }kjk iznÙk

'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, Hkkjrh; nar fpfdRlk ifj"kn~ ls ijke'kZ djds] mDr vf/fu;e ds vuqlwph ds Hkkx&1 esa fuEufyf[kr la'kks/u

djrh gS] uker%µ

2- gsepaæ vkpk;Z ukFkZ xqtjkr fo'ofo|ky;] ikVu }kjk iznku dh tk jgh nar fpfdRlk fMfxz;ksa dks ekU;rk nsus ds ckjs esa nar

fpfdRlk vf/fu;e] 1948 (1948 dk 16) dh vuqlwph ds Hkkx&I esa Øe la[;k 93 ds lkeus dkWye 2 rFkk 3 dh ekStwnk izfof"V;ksa esa blds

i'pkr~ fuEufyf[kr izfof"V;ksa dks var£o"V fd;k tk,xk %&

¶1- ujflag HkkbZ iVsy nar fpfdRlk egkfo|ky; vkSj vLirky] foluxj (xqtjkr)

nar&'kY; fpfdRlk Lukrd

chMh,l] gsepaæ vkpk;Z ukFkZ xqtjkr fo'ofo|ky;]

(;fn fnukad 2&7&2010 dks ;k mlds ckn iznku dh xbZA)

ikVu A¸

¹la- oh-&12017@78@2005&Mh bZº

vfurk f=kikBh] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 10th December, 2010

S.O. 364.— In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of Section 10 of the Dentists Act, 1948

(16 of 1948), the Central Government, after consultation with Dental Council of India, hereby, makes the following

amendments in Part-I of the Schedule to the said Act, namely :—

2. In the existing entries of column 2 & 3 against Serial No.93, in Part-I of the Schedule to the Dentists Act, 1948

(16 of 1948) pertaining to recognition of dental degrees awarded by Hemchandracharya North Gujarat University, Patan

the following entries shall be inserted thereunder :—

‘‘1

Narsinhbhai Patel Dental College & Hospital, Visngar (Gujarat).

Bachelor of Dental Surgery

BDS, Hemchandracharya North Gujarat University,

( if granted on or after 2-7-2010)

Patan.’’

[No. V-12017/78/2005-DE]

ANITA TRIPATHI, Under Secy.

ubZ fnYyh] 4 tuojh] 2011

dk-vk- 365-—dsUæh; ljdkj] Hkkjrh; fpfdRlk ifj"kn~ vf/fu;e] 1956 (1956 dk 102) dh /kjk 11 dh mi&/kjk (2) }kjk

iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] Hkkjrh; fpfdRlk ifj"kn~ ds ijke'kZ ds ckn mDr vf/fu;e dh çFke vuqlwph esa fuEufyf[kr la'kks/u

vkSj djrh gS] uker% %µ

mDr vuqlwph esa

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

1005

d- ^ekU;rkçkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk* ¹blds ckn dkye (2) ds :i esa fufnZ"Vº 'kh"kZd ds varxZr vkSj ^iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr :i* ¹blds

ckn dkye (3) ds :i esa fufnZ"Vº] 'kh"kZd ds varxZr vafre çfof"V ,oa mlls lacaf/r çfof"V ds ckn ¶iatkc fo'ofo|ky;¸ ds lkeus

fuEufyf[kr dks vUrfuZ"V fd;k tk,xk] uker %&

(2)

(3)

MkWDVj vkWiQ esfMflu@ekLVj vkWiQ ltZjh

(çlwfr foKku ,oa L=kh jksx foKku)

,eMh@,e,l (çlwfr foKku)

(fØf'p;u esfMdy dkyst] yqf/;kuk esa çf'kf{kr fo|kfFZk;ksa ds ckjs esa 1968 esa ;k mlds

ckn iatkc fo'ofo|ky; }kjk LohÑfr ds ckn ;g ekU;rkçkIr vgZrk gksxh)

[k- mDr vuqlwph esa ^ekU;rkçkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk* ¹blds ckn dkye (2) ds :i esa fufnZ"Vº 'kh"kZd ds varxZr vkSj ^iathdj.k

ds fy, laf{kIr :i* ¹blds ckn dkWye (3) ds :i esa fufnZ"Vº] 'kh"kZd ds varxZr vafre çfof"V ,oa mlls lacaf/r çfof"V ds ckn ¶ckck

iQjhn LokLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky;] iQjhndksV¸ ds lkeus fuEufyf[kr dks vUrfuZ"V fd;k tk,xk] uker% %µ

MkWDVj vkWiQ esfMflu@ekLVj vkWiQ ltZjh

(çlwfr foKku ,oa L=kh jksx foKku)]

,eMh@,e,l (çlwfr foKku)

(fØf'pu esfMdy dkyst] yqf/;kuk esa çf'kf{kr fo|kfFZk;ksa ds ckjs esa 1968 esa ;k mlds ckn

ckck iQjhn LokLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky; }kjk LohÑfr ds ckn ;g ekU;rk çkIr vgZrk gksxh)

lHkh ds fy, uksV% 1-

LukrdksÙkj ikB~;Øe dks bl çdkj çnku dh xbZ ekU;rk vf/dre 5 o"kZ dh vof/ ds fy, gksxh ftlds ckn bls

uohÑr fd;k tkuk gksxk A

mi&[k.M&4 esa ;Fkk visf{kr ekU;rk ds le; ij uohdj.k ugha fd, tkus ij lacaf/r ikB~;Øe esa ukekadu dks

fuf'pr :i ls can dj fn;k tk,xk A

¹la- ;w- 12012@187@2010&,ebZ (ih&II)º

vfurk f=kikBh] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 4th January, 2011

S.O. 365.— In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of Section 11 of the Indian Medical Council

Act, 1956 (102 of 1956), the Central Government, after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby makes the following

further amendments in the First Schedule to the said Act, due to change of nomenclature of the qualification namely :—

In the said Schedule—

(a) against ‘‘Punjab University’’ under the heading ‘Recognised Medical Qualification’ [hereinafter referred to as

column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation for Registration’ [hereinafter

referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely :—

(2)

(3)

‘‘Doctor of Medicine/Master of Surgery

MD/MS (OBG)

(Obsyetrics & Gynaecology)’’

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Punjab

University in respect of students being trained at Christian Medical College,

Ludhiana on or after 1968).

(b) against ‘‘Baba Farid University of Health Sciences, Faridkot’’ under the heading ‘Recognised Medical Qualification’

[hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation for

Registration’ [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely :—

‘‘Doctor of Medicine/Master of Surgery

MD/MS (OBG)

(Obstretrics & Gynaecology)’’

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Baba Farid

University of Health Sciences, Faridkot in respect of students being trained at

Christian Medical College, Ludhiana on or after 1968).

Note to all :

1. The recognition so granted to a Postgraduate Course shall be for a maximum period of 5 years, upon

which it shall have to be renewed.

1006

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2. Failure to seek timely renewal of recognition as required in sub-cause-4 shall invariably result in

stoppage of admissions to the concerned Postgraduate Course.

[No. U. 12012/187/2010-MEP(P-II)]

ANITA TRIPATHI, Under Secy.

ubZ fnYyh] 18 tuojh] 2011

dk-vk- 366-—dsUæ ljdkj] nar fpfdRlk vf/fu;e] 1948 (1948 dk 16) dh /kjk (3) ds rgr iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx

djrs gq, LokLF; ,oa ifjokj dY;k.k ea=kky; dh Hkkjr ljdkj vf/lwpuk la[;k ,l-vks- 430 fnukad 24 tuojh] 1984 esa fuEufyf[kr

la'kks/u djrh gS] uker% %—

2- mDr vf/lwpuk esa] ¶[kaM 3 ds mikca/ lfgr ifBr] [kaM (p) ds varxZr ukfer 'kh"kZ ds varxZr Ø- la[;k 2] vkSj Øe

la[;k 5 ds i'pkr~ fuEufyf[kr dks çfrLFkkfir fd;k tk,xk] uker%

¶2- MkW- tkslsiQ blkd]

ukfer

dsUæ ljdkj

18&1&2011

funs'kd] ,dsMfed rFkk ç'kklu]

vksFkksZMksafVDl foHkkx ds çksiQslj rFkk çeq[k

iq"ikfxfj nar fpfdRlk egkfo|ky;

fr:oYYkk] dsjy

(nar&fpfdRlk vf/fu;e] 1948 dh /kjk

6(4) ds lanHkZ esa fnukad 15&2&2010 ls

ikap o"kZ dh 'ks"k vof/ ds fy, os in

dk dk;ZHkkj laHkkys jgsaxs A)

5- MkW- galjkt çse lpnso

ukfer

dsUæ ljdkj

18&1&2011**

vè;{k] ppZ xsV /ekFkZ

esfMdy lkslkbVh]

58@2] v'kksd uxj] ubZ fnYyh&110018

¹la- oh- 12013@2@2009&Mh bZº

vfurk f=kikBh] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 18th January, 2011

S.O. 366.— In exercise of the powers conferred under section 3 of the Dentists Act, 1948 (16 of 1948), the Central

Government, hereby makes the following amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of

Health and Family Welfare No. S.O. 430 dated 24th January, 1984, namely :—

In the said notification under head ‘‘Nominated under clause (f) read with proviso to Section 3’’ for serial Nos. 2

&5 and the entries relating thereto, the following shall be substituted therein, namely :—

‘‘2. Dr. Joseph Issac

Nominated

Central Government

18-01-2011

Director, Academics & Administration,

Professor & Head of the Department of

Orthodontics, Pushpagiri College of

Dental Sciences, Tiruvalla, Kerala

(In terms of Section 6(4) of the Dentists

Act, 1948, he shall hold the office for the

remainder of the term of five years w.e.f. 15-02-2010)

Dr. Hans Raj Prem Sachdev

Nominated

Cenral Government

18-01-2011’’

Chairman, Church Gate Charitable

Medical Society

58/2, Ashok Nagar, New Delhi-110018

[No. V.12013/2/2009-DE]

ANITA TRIPATHI, Under Secy.

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

1007

miHkksDrk ekeys] [kk| vkSj lkoZtfud forj.k ea=kky;

(miHkksDrk ekeys foHkkx)

ubZ fnYyh] 22 uoEcj] 2010

dk-vk- 367-—dsUnzh; ljdkj dk] fofgr izkf/dkjh }kjk mls izLrqr fjiksVZ ij fopkj djus ds i'pkr~ ;g lek/ku gks x;k gS fd

mDr fjiksVZ esa o£.kr ekWMy (uhps nh xbZ vkÑfr ns[ksa) ckV vkSj eki ekud vf/fu;e] 1976(1976 dk 60) rFkk ckV vkSj eki ekud

(ekWMyksa dk vuqeksnu) fu;e] 1987 ds mica/ksa ds vuq:i gS vkSj bl ckr dh laHkkouk gS fd yxkrkj iz;ksx dh vof/ esa Hkh mDr ekWMy

;FkkFkZrk cuk, j[ksxk vkSj fofHkUu ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa mi;qDr lsok iznku djrk jgsxk_

vr%] vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] mDr vf/fu;e dh /kjk 36 dh mi&/kjk (7) vkSj mi&/kjk (8) }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs

gq, eSllZ tkWulUl bysDVªksfuDl] vkj CykWd] 38&ch] fny'kkn xkMZu] fnYyh&110095 }kjk fofu£er e?;e ;FkkFkZrk (;FkkFkZrk&III) okys

^^tsbZMCY;wch** Ük`a[kyk ds vadd lwpu lfgr vLopkfyr rksyu midj.k (bysDVªksfud osfczt) ds ekWMy dk] ftlds czkaM dk uke

¶tkWulUl¸ gS (ftls blesa blds i'pkr~ mDr ekWMy dgk x;k gS) vkSj ftls vuqeksnu fpÉ vkbZ ,u Mh@09@10@270 leuqnsf'kr fd;k x;k

gS] vuqeksnu izek.k i=k tkjh djrh gS A

mDr ekWMy ,d foÑr xst izdkj dk Hkkj lsy vk/kfjr vLopkfyr rksyu midj.k (bysDVªksfud osfczt) gS A bldh vf/dre

{kerk 40 Vu vkSj U;wure {kerk 100 fd- xzk- gS A lR;kiu ekieku vUrjky (bZ) 5 fd- xzk- gS A blesa ,d vk/s;rqyu ;qfDr gS ftldk

'kr izfr'kr O;odyukRed /kfjr vk/s;rqyu izHkko gS A izdk'k mRltZd Mk;ksM (,y bZ Mh) rksyu ifj.kke min£'kr djrk gS A midj.k

230 oksYV vkSj 50 gV~tZ izR;korhZ /kjk fo|qr iznk; ij dk;Z djrk gS A

vkÑfr &2 ekWMy dks lhfyax djus dk ;kstukc¼ Mk;xzke

Ldsy dh ckMh ds Nsnksa esa ls lh¯yx ok;j fudky dj lh¯yx dh tkrh gS A ekWMy dks lhycan djus ds mica/ dk ,d iz:ih

;kstukc¼ Mk;xzke mQij fn;k x;k gS A

midj.k esa dsfyczs'ku ds fy, ckgjh igqap gS A ckgjh dsfyczs'ku rd igqap dks jksdus ds fy, ,@Mh dkMZ@enj cksMZ esa fMi fLop

Hkh fn;k x;k gS A

vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj mDr vf/fu;e dh /kjk 36 dh mi&/kjk (12) }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, ;g ?kks"k.kk djrh

gS fd mDr ekWMy ds vuqeksnu ds bl izek.ki=k ds varxZr mlh fofuekZrk }kjk mlh fl¼kar] fMtkbu ds vuqlkj vkSj mlh lkezxh ls ftlls

mDr vuqeksfnr ekWMy fofuekZ.k fd;k x;k gS] fofu£er mlh Ük`a[kyk ds oSls gh esd] ;FkkFkZrk vkSj dk;Zikyu ds rksyu midj.k Hkh gksaxs tks

5 xzk- ;k mlls vf/d ds ¶bZ¸ eku ds fy, 500 ls 10]000 rd dh jsat esa lR;kiu ekieku varjky (,u) lfgr 5 Vu ls 200 Vu rd

dh vf/dre {kerk okys gSa vkSj ¶bZ¸ eku 1x10^ds] 2x10^ds ;k ds 5x10 ^ds] ds gSa] tks /ukRed ;k Í.kkRed iw.kk±d 'kwU; ds lerqY; gSa A

¹iQk- la- MCY;w ,e&21(186)@2010º

ch- ,u- nhf{kr] funs'kd] fof/d eki foKku

1008

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

(Department of Consumer Affairs)

New Delhi, the 22nd November, 2010

S.O. 367.—Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed

authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the

provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and

Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of

sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the

Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non-automatic weighing

instrument (Electronic Weighbridge) with digital indication of medium Accuracy (Accuracy class -III) of Series ‘‘JEWB”

and with brand name ‘‘JONSONS” (hereinafter referred to as the said Model), maunfactured by M/s Jansons Electronics,

R-Block, 38-B, Dilshad Garden, Delhi- 110095 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/10/270 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non-automatic weighing instrument (Electronic Weighbridge)

with a maximum capacity of 40 tonne and minimum capacity of 100 kg. The verification scale interval (e) is 5kg. It has a tare

device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing

results. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure-1 Top of Indicator

Figure-2 Schematic Diagram of sealing provision of the model

Sealing is done by passing the sealing wire from the body of the indicator through holes. A typical schematic

diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration.

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub-section (12) of Section 36 of the said, Act, the Central

Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of

similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and up to 200 tonne with

verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ‘e’ value of 5g. or above and with ‘e’ value of 1x10^k,

2x10^k,or 5x10^k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer

in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been

manufactured.

[ F. No.WM-21/(186)/2010]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

1009

ubZ fnYyh] 22 uoEcj] 2010

dk-vk- 368-—dsUnzh; ljdkj dk] fofgr izkf/dkjh }kjk mls izLrqr fjiksVZ ij fopkj djus ds i'pkr~ ;g lek/ku gks x;k gS fd

mDr fjiksVZ esa o£.kr ekWMy (uhps nh xbZ vkÑfr ns[ksa) ckV vkSj eki ekud vf/fu;e] 1976(1976 dk 60) rFkk ckV vkSj eki ekud

(ekWMyksa dk vuqeksnu) fu;e] 1987 ds mica/ksa ds vuq:i gS vkSj bl ckr dh laHkkouk gS fd yxkrkj iz;ksx dh vof/ esa Hkh mDr ekWMy

;FkkFkZrk cuk, j[ksxk vkSj fofHkUu ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa mi;qDr lsok iznku djrk jgsxk_

vr%] vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] mDr vf/fu;e dh /kjk 36 dh mi&/kjk (7) vkSj mi&/kjk (8) }kjk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,

eSllZ tkWulUl bysDVªksfuDl] vkj CykWd] 38&ch] fny'kkn xkMZu] fnYyh&110095 }kjk fofu£er e?;e ;FkkFkZrk (;FkkFkZrk&III) okys

^^tsbZlh,l** Ük`a[kyk ds vadd lwpu lfgr vLopkfyr rksyu midj.k (Øsu Vkbi) ds ekWMy dk] ftlds czkaM dk uke ¶tkWulUl¸ gS

(ftls blesa blds i'pkr~ mDr ekWMy dgk x;k gS) vkSj ftls vuqeksnu fpÉ vkbZ ,u Mh@09@10@271 leuqnsf'kr fd;k x;k gS] vuqeksnu

izek.k&i=k tkjh djrh gS A

mDr ekWMy ,d foÑr xst izdkj dk Hkkj lsy vk/kfjr vLopkfyr rksyu midj.k (Øsu Vkbi) gS A bldh vf/dre {kerk

5 Vu U;wure {kerk 20 fd- xzk- gS A lR;kiu ekieku vUrjky (bZ) 1 fd- xzk- gS A blesa ,d vk/s;rqyu ;qfDr gS ftldk 'kr izfr'kr

O;odyukRed /kfjr vk/s;rqyu izHkko gS A izdk'k mRltZd Mk;ksM (,y bZ Mh) rksyu ifj.kke min£'kr djrk gS A midj.k 230 oksYV

vkSj 50 gV~tZ izR;korhZ /kjk fo|qr iznk; ij dk;Z djrk gS A

vkÑfr &2 ekWMy dks lhfyax djus dk ;kstukc¼ Mk;xzke

Ldsy dh ckMh ds Nsnksa esa ls lh¯yx ok;j fudkydj lh¯yx dh tkrh gS A ekWMy dks lhycan djus ds mica/ dk ,d iz:ih

;kstukc¼ Mk;xzke mQij fn;k x;k gS A

midj.k esa dsfyczs'ku ds fy, ckgjh igqap gS A ckgjh dsfyczs'ku rd igqap dks jksdus ds fy, ,@Mh dkMZ@enj cksMZ esa fMi fLop

Hkh fn;k x;k gS A

vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj mDr vf/fu;e dh /kjk 36 dh mi&/kjk (12) }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, ;g ?kks"k.kk djrh

gS fd mDr ekWMy ds vuqeksnu ds bl izek.ki=k ds varxZr mlh fofuekZrk }kjk mlh fl¼kar] fMtkbu ds vuqlkj vkSj mlh lkezxh ls ftlls

mDr vuqeksfnr ekWMy fofuekZ.k fd;k x;k gS] fofu£er mlh Ük`a[kyk ds oSls gh esd] ;FkkFkZrk vkSj dk;Zikyu ds rksyu midj.k Hkh gksaxs tks 5 xzk- ;k

mlls vf/d ds ¶bZ¸ eku ds fy, 500 ls 10]000 rd dh jsat esa lR;kiu ekieku varjky (,u) lfgr 50 fd-xzk- ls 30 Vu

rd dh vf/dre {kerk okys gSa vkSj ¶bZ¸ eku 1x10^ds] 2x10^ds ;k 5x10 ^ds] ds gSa] tks /ukRed ;k Í.kkRed iw.kk±d ;k 'kwU; ds lerqY; gSa A

¹iQk- la- MCY;w ,e&21(186)@2010º

ch- ,u- nhf{kr] funs'kd] fof/d eki foKku

1010

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 22nd November, 2010

S.O. 368.—Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed

authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the

provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and

Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of

sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the

Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non-authomatic weighing

instrument (Crane type) with digital indication of medium Accuracy (Accuracy class -III) of Series ‘‘JECS” and with brand

name ‘‘JONSONS” (hereinafter referred to as the said Model), maunfactured by M/s Jansons Electronics, R-Block, 38-B,

Dilshad Garden, Delhi- 110095 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/10/271;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non-automatic weighing instrument (Electronic Weighbridge)

with a maximum capacity of 5 tonne. and minimum capacity of 20 kg. The verification scale interval (e) is 5kg. It has a tare

device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing

result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure-1

Figure-2 Schematic Diagram of sealing provision of the model

Sealing is done by pasing the sealing wire from the body of the machine through holes. A typical schematic

diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration.

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub-section (12) of Section 36 of the said, Act, the Central

Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of

similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg. and up to 30 tonne with

verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ‘e’ value of 5g. or above and with ‘e’ value of 1x10^k,

2x10^k,or 5x10^k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer

in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been

manufactured.

[ F. No.WM-21/(186)/2010]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

1011

ubZ fnYyh] 22 uoEcj] 2010

dk-vk- 369-—dsUnzh; ljdkj dk] fofgr izkf/dkjh }kjk mls izLrqr fjiksVZ ij fopkj djus ds i'pkr~ ;g lek/ku gks x;k gS fd

mDr fjiksVZ esa o£.kr ekWMy (uhps nh xbZ vkÑfr ns[ksa) ckV vkSj eki ekud vf/fu;e] 1976 (1976 dk 60) rFkk ckV vkSj eki ekud

(ekWMyksa dk vuqeksnu) fu;e] 1987 ds mica/ksa ds vuq:i gS vkSj bl ckr dh laHkkouk gS fd yxkrkj iz;ksx dh vof/ esa Hkh mDr ekWMy

;FkkFkZrk cuk, j[ksxk vkSj fofHkUu ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa mi;qDr lsok iznku djrk jgsxk_

vr% vc dsUnzh; ljdkj] mDr vf/fu;e dh /kjk 36 dh mi&/kjk (7) vkSj mi&/kjk (8) }kjk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,

eSllZ tkWulUl bysDVªksfuDl] vkj CykWd] 38&ch] fny'kkn xkMZu] fnYyh&110095 }kjk fofu£er e?;e ;FkkFkZrk (;FkkFkZrk&III) okys

^^tsbZlhds** Ük`a[kyk ds vadd lwpu lfgr vLopkfyr rksyu midj.k (dUolZu fdV osfczt) ds ekWMy dk] ftlds czkaM dk uke

¶tkWulUl¸ gS (ftls blesa blds i'pkr~ mDr ekWMy dgk x;k gS) vkSj ftls vuqeksnu fpÉ vkbZ ,u Mh@09@10@272 leuqnsf'kr fd;k x;k

gS] vuqeksnu izek.k i=k tkjh djrh gS A

mDr ekWMy ,d foÑr xst izdkj dk Hkkj lsy vk/kfjr vLopkfyr rksyu midj.k (dUolZu fdV osfczt) gS A bldh vf/dre

{kerk 40 Vu vkSj U;wure {kerk 100 fd- xzk- gS A lR;kiu ekieku vUrjky (bZ) 5 fd- xzk- gS A blesa ,d vk/s;rqyu ;qfDr gS ftldk

'kr izfr'kr O;odyukRed /kfjr vk/s;rqyu izHkko gS A izdk'k mRltZd Mk;ksM (,y bZ Mh) rksyu ifj.kke min£'kr djrk gS A midj.k

230 oksYV vkSj 50 gV~tZ izR;korhZ /kjk fo|qr iznk; ij dk;Z djrk gS A

vkÑfr 2µekWMy dks lhfyax djus dk ;kstukc¼ Mk;xzke

Ldsy dh ckMh ds Nsnksa esa ls lh¯yx ok;j fudky dj lh¯yx dh tkrh gS A ekWMy dks lhycan djus ds mica/ dk ,d iz:ih

;kstukc¼ Mk;xzke mQij fn;k x;k gS A

ckgjh dsfyczs'ku rd igqap dks jksdus ds fy, ,@Mh dkMZ@enj cksMZ esa fMi fLop Hkh fn;k x;k gS A

vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj mDr vf/fu;e dh /kjk 36 dh mi&/kjk (12) }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, ;g ?kks"k.kk djrh

gS fd mDr ekWMy ds vuqeksnu ds bl izek.k i=k ds varxZr mlh fofuekZrk }kjk mlh fl¼kar] fMtkbu ds vuqlkj vkSj mlh lkexzh ls ftlls

mDr vuqeksfnr ekWMy fofuekZ.k fd;k x;k gS] fofu£er mlh Ük`a[kyk ds oSls gh esd] ;FkkFkZrk vkSj dk;Zikyu ds rksyu midj.k Hkh gksaxs tks

5 xzk- ;k mlls vf/d ds ¶bZ¸ eku ds fy, 500 ls 10]000 rd dh jsat esa lR;kiu ekieku varjky (,u) lfgr 5 Vu ls 200 Vu

rd dh vf/dre {kerk okys gSa vkSj ¶bZ¸ eku 1x10^ds] 2x10^ds] ;k 5x10 ^ds] ds gSa] tks ?kukRed ;k Í.kkRed iw.kk±d ;k 'kwU; ds lerqY;

gSa A

¹iQk- la- MCY;w ,e&21(186)@2010º

ch- ,u- nhf{kr] funs'kd] fof/d eki foKku

1012

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 22nd November, 2010

S.O. 369.—Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed

authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the

provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and

Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of

sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the

Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non-automatic weighing

instrument (Conversion kit Weighbridge) with digital indication of medium Accuracy (Accuracy class -III) of Series

‘‘JECK” and with brand name ‘‘JONSONS” (hereinafter referred to as the said Model), manufactured by M/s. Jansons

Electronics, R-Block, 38-B, Dilshad Garden, Delhi-110095 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/10/272;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non-automatic weighing instrument (Conversion Kit

Weighbridge) with a maximum capacity of 40 tonne and minimum capacity of 100 kg. The verfication scale interval (e) is

5kg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display

indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure 2—Schematic Diagram of sealing provision of the model

Sealing is done by pasing the sealing wire from the body of the indicator through holes. A typical schematic

diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of

similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and upto 200 tonne with

verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ‘e’ value of 5g. or above and with ‘e’ value of 1x10^k, 2x10^k

or 5x10^k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in

accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been

manufactured.

[ F. No.WM-21 (186)/2010]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

1013

ubZ fnYyh] 22 uoEcj] 2010

dk-vk- 370-—dsUnzh; ljdkj dk] fofgr izkf/dkjh }kjk mls izLrqr fjiksVZ ij fopkj djus ds i'pkr~ ;g lek/ku gks x;k gS fd

mDr fjiksVZ esa o£.kr ekWMy (uhps nh xbZ vkÑfr ns[ksa) ckV vkSj eki ekud vf/fu;e] 1976 (1976 dk 60) rFkk ckV vkSj eki ekud

(ekWMyksa dk vuqeksnu) fu;e] 1987 ds mica/ksa ds vuq:i gSa vkSj bl ckr dh laHkkouk gS fd yxkrkj iz;ksx dh vof/ esa Hkh mDr ekWMy

;FkkFkZrk cuk, j[ksxk vkSj fofHkUu ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa mi;qDr lsok iznku djrk jgsxk_

vr%] vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] mDr vf/fu;e dh /kjk 36 dh mi&/kjk (7) vkSj mi&/kjk (8) }kjk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,

eSllZ feuVSd] ckckuxj ysu] jkckdfo] Vh,,y% te[k.Mh] ftyk cxydksV] dukZVd }kjk fofu£er e?;e ;FkkFkZrk (;FkkFkZrk oxZ&III) okys

^^,eVhVhVh** Ük`a[kyk ds vadd lwpu lfgr vLopkfyr rksyu midj.k (VscyVki Vkbi) ds ekWMy dk] ftlds czkaM dk uke ¶feuVSd¸ gS

(ftls blesa blds i'pkr~ mDr ekWMy dgk x;k gS) vkSj ftls vuqeksnu fpÉ vkbZ ,u Mh@09@10@255 leuqnsf'kr fd;k x;k gS] vuqeksnu

izek.k i=k tkjh djrh gS A

mDr ekWMy ,d foÑr xst izdkj dk Hkkj lsy vk/kfjr vLopkfyr rksyu midj.k (VscyVki izdkj) gS A bldh vf/dre

{kerk 30 fd-xzk- vkSj U;wure {kerk 100 fd- xzk- gS A lR;kiu ekieku vUrjky (bZ) 5 xzk- gS A blesa ,d vk/s;rqyu ;qfDr gS ftldk

'kr izfr'kr O;odyukRed /kfjr vk/s;rqyu izHkko gS A izdk'k mRltZd Mk;ksM (,y bZ Mh) izn'kZ rksyu ifj.kke min£'kr djrk gS A

midj.k 230 oksYV vkSj 50 gV~tZ izR;korhZ /kjk fo|qr iznk; ij dk;Z djrk gS A

vkÑfr 2µmidj.k ds ekWMy dk lhfyax izko/ku

Ldsy dh ckMh ds gksYl esa ls lh¯yx ok;j fudky dj lh¯yx dh tkrh gS A ekWMy dks lhycan djus ds mica/ dk ,d iz:ih

;kstukc¼ Mk;xzke mQij fn;k x;k gS A

midj.k esa ckgjh dsfyczs'ku rd igqap dh lqfo/k gS A ckgjh dsfyczs'ku rd igqap dks jksdus ds fy, ,@Mh dkMZ@enj cksMZ esa fMi

fLop Hkh fn;k x;k gS A

vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj mDr vf/fu;e dh /kjk 36 dh mi&/kjk (12) }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, ;g ?kks"k.kk djrh

gS fd mDr ekWMy ds vuqeksnu ds bl izek.k i=k ds varxZr mlh fofuekZrk }kjk mlh fl¼kar] fMtkbu ds vuqlkj vkSj mlh lkexzh ls ftlls

mDr vuqeksfnr ekWMy fofuekZ.k fd;k x;k gS] fofu£er mlh Ük`a[kyk ds oSls gh esd] ;FkkFkZrk vkSj dk;Zikyu ds rksyu midj.k Hkh gksaxs tks

1fe- xzk- ls 2 xzk- rd ds ¶bZ¸ eku ds fy, 100 ls 10]000 rd dh jsat esa lR;kiu ekieku varjky (,u) vkSj 5 xzk- ;k mlls vf/d ds

¶bZ¸ eku ds fy, 500 ls 10]000 rd dh jsat esa lR;kiu varjky (,u) lfgr 50 fd-xzk- rd dh vf/dre {kerk okys gSa vkSj ¶bZ¸ eku

1x10^ds] 2x10^ds] 5x10^ds] ds gSa] tks ?kukRed ;k Í.kkRed iw.kk±d ;k 'kwU; ds lerqY; gSa A

¹iQk- la- MCY;w ,e&21(157)@2010º

ch- ,u- nhf{kr] funs'kd] fof/d eki foKku

1014

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 22nd November, 2010

S.O. 370.—Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed

authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the

provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and

Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of

sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the

Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non-automatic weighing

instrument (Table top type) with digital indication of medium Accuracy (Accuracy class -III) of Series ‘‘MTTT” and with

brand name ‘‘MINTECH” (hereinafter referred to as the said Model), manufactured by M/s. Mintech, Babanagar Lane,

Rabakavi, Tal: Jamakhandi, Dist: Bagalkot, Karnataka and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/10/255;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non-automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with

a maximum capacity of 30kg. and minimum capacity of 100 g. The verfication scale interval (e) is 5g. It has a tare device with

a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result. The

instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure 2—Schematic Diagram of sealing provision of the model

Sealing is done by pasing the sealing wire from the body of the scale through holes. A typical schematic diagram

of sealing provision of the model is given above.

A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of

similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with verification scale interval (n)

in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ‘e’ value of 1mg to 2 g and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000

for ‘e’ value of 5g or more and with ‘e’ value of 1x10^k, 2x10^k or 5x10^k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal

to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials

with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[ F. No.WM-21 (157)/2010]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

1015

ubZ fnYyh] 22 uoEcj] 2010

dk-vk- 371-—dsUnzh; ljdkj dk] fofgr izkf/dkjh }kjk mls izLrqr fjiksVZ ij fopkj djus ds i'pkr~ ;g lek/ku gks x;k gS fd

mDr fjiksVZ esa o£.kr ekWMy (uhps nh xbZ vkÑfr ns[ksa) ckV vkSj eki ekud vf/fu;e] 1976 (1976 dk 60) rFkk ckV vkSj eki ekud

(ekWMyksa dk vuqeksnu) fu;e] 1987 ds mica/ksa ds vuq:i gS vkSj bl ckr dh laHkkouk gS fd yxkrkj iz;ksx dh vof/ esa Hkh mDr ekWMy

;FkkFkZrk cuk, j[ksxk vkSj fofHkUu ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa mi;qDr lsok iznku djrk jgsxk_

vr% vc dsUnzh; ljdkj] mDr vf/fu;e dh /kjk 36 dh mi&/kjk (7) vkSj mi&/kjk (8) }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs

gq, eSllZ feuVSd] ckckuxj ysu] jkckdfo] Vh,,y% te[k.Mh] ftyk cxydksV] dukZVd }kjk fofu£er e?;e ;FkkFkZrk (;FkkFkZrk oxZ&III)

okys ^^,eVhih,iQ** Ük`a[kyk ds vadd lwpu lfgr vLopkfyr rksyu midj.k (IysViQkeZ Vkbi) ds ekWMy dk] ftlds czkaM dk uke

¶feuVSd¸ gS (ftls blesa blds i'pkr~ mDr ekWMy dgk x;k gS) vkSj ftls vuqeksnu fpÉ vkbZ ,u Mh@09@10@256 leuqnsf'kr fd;k x;k

gS] vuqeksnu izek.k i=k tkjh djrh gS _

mDr ekWMy ,d foÑr xst izdkj dk Hkkj lsy vk/kfjr vLopkfyr rksyu midj.k (IysViQkeZ Vkbi) gS A bldh vf/dre

{kerk 1000 fd-xzk- vkSj U;wure {kerk 4 fd- xzk- gS A lR;kiu ekieku vUrjky (bZ) 200 xzk- gS A blesa ,d vk/s;rqyu ;qfDr gS ftldk

'kr izfr'kr O;dyukRed /kfjr vk/s;rqyu izHkko gS A izdk'k mRltZd Mk;ksM (,y bZ Mh) izn'kZ rksyu ifj.kke min£'kr djrk gS A

midj.k 230 oksYV vkSj 50 gV~Zt izR;korhZ /kjk fo|qr iznk; ij dk;Z djrk gS A

vkÑfr &2 ekWMy dks lhfyax djus dk ;kstukc¼ Mk;xzke

fMLIys dh ckMh esa ls lh¯yx ok;j fudky dj fMLIys ds jkbV lkbM@cSd lkbM esa lh¯yx dh xbZ gS A fMLIys dh csl IysV vkSj

Vki doj ds Nsn ls lhy dks tksM+k x;k gS] rc lhy ok;j bu nksuksa Nsnksa esa ls fudky dj lhy ls tksM+k x;k gS A ekWMy dks lhycan djus

ds mica/ dk ,d iz:ih ;kstukc¼ Mk;xzke mijksDr fn;k x;k gS A

midj.k esa dsfyczs'ku ds fy, ckgjh igqap gS A ckgjh dsfyczs'ku rd igqap dks jksdus ds fy, ,@Mh dkMZ@enj cksMZ esa fMi fLop

Hkh fn;k x;k gS A

vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj mDr vf/fu;e dh /kjk 36 dh mi&/kjk (12) }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, ;g ?kks"k.kk djrh

gS fd mDr ekWMy ds vuqeksnu ds bl izek.ki=k ds varxZr mlh fofuekZrk }kjk mlh fl¼kar] fMtkbu ds vuqlkj vkSj mlh lkezxh ls ftlls

mDr vuqeksfnr ekWMy fofuekZ.k fd;k x;k gS] fofu£er mlh Ük`a[kyk ds oSls gh esd] ;FkkFkZrk vkSj dk;Zikyu ds rksyu midj.k Hkh gksaxs tks

5 xzk- ;k mlls vf/d ds ¶bZ¸ eku ds fy, 500 ls 10]000 rd dh jsat esa lR;kiu ekieku varjky (,u) lfgr 50 fd-xzk- ls

5000 fd-xzk-rd dh vf/dre {kerk okys gSa vkSj ¶bZ¸ eku 1x10^ds] 2x10^ds 5x10 ^ds] ds gSa] tks ?kukRed ;k Í.kkRed iw.kk±d 'kwU; ds

lerqY; gSa A

¹iQk- la- MCY;w ,e&21(157)@2010º

ch- ,u- nhf{kr] funs'kd] fof/d eki foKku

1016

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 22nd November, 2010

S.O. 371.—Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed

authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the

provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and

Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of

sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the

Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non-automatic weighing

instrument (Platform type) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class -III) of Series ‘‘MTPF” and with

brand name ‘‘MINTECH” (hereinafter referred to as the said Model), maunfactured by M/s Mintech, Babanagar Lane,

Rabakavi, Tal. Jamakhandi, Dist. Bagalkot, Karnataka and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/10/256;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non-automatic weighing instrument (Platform type) with

a maximum capacity of 1000kg. and minimum capacity of 4kg. The verfication scale interval (e) is 200g. It has a tare device

with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result.

The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure-2

Figure-2 Schematic Diagram of the sealing provision of the model

Sealing is done on the right side/back side of the display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display.

The seal is connected by whole in base plate and top cover of display, than seal wire is passed through these two holes

attached with seal. A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

The instrument has external control to calibration. A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board

to disable access to external calibration.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (12) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of

similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg and up to 5000kg with

verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ‘e’ value of 5g. or more and with ‘e’ value of 1x10^k, 2x10^k,or

5x10^k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in

accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been

manufactured.

[ F. No.WM-21/(157)/2010]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

1017

ubZ fnYyh] 22 uoEcj] 2010

dk-vk- 372-—dsUnzh; ljdkj dk] fofgr izkf/dkjh }kjk mls izLrqr fjiksVZ ij fopkj djus ds i'pkr~ ;g lek/ku gks x;k gS fd

mDr fjiksVZ esa o£.kr ekWMy (uhps nh xbZ vkÑfr ns[ksa) ckV vkSj eki ekud vf/fu;e] 1976(1976 dk 60) rFkk ckV vkSj eki ekud

(ekWMyksa dk vuqeksnu) fu;e] 1987 ds mica/ksa ds vuq:i gSa vkSj bl ckr dh laHkkouk gS fd yxkrkj iz;ksx dh vof/ esa Hkh mDr ekWMy

;FkkFkZrk cuk, j[ksxk vkSj fofHkUu ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa mi;qDr lsok iznku djrk jgsxk_

vr%] vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] mDr vf/fu;e dh /kjk 36 dh mi&/kjk (7) vkSj mi&/kjk (8) }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs

gq, eSllZ ,ou dkjiksjs'ku fy-] 15 ch] ¯ox nwljk ry] dey dqat] ,l-oh-jksM] va/sjh osLV] eqacbZ&400 058 }kjk fofu£er fo'ks"k ;FkkFkZrk

(;FkkFkZrk oxZ&I) okys ^^, ih&200&4** Ük`a[kyk ds vadd lwpu lfgr vLopkfyr rksyu midj.k (VscyVki Vkbi) ds ekWMy dk] ftlds

czkaM dk uke ¶,ou¸ gS (ftls blesa blds i'pkr~ mDr ekWMy dgk x;k gS) vkSj ftls vuqeksnu fpÉ vkbZ ,u Mh@09@10@235 leuqnsf'kr

fd;k x;k gS] vuqeksnu izek.k&i=k tkjh djrh gS A

mDr ekWMy ,d bySDVªks eSxusfVd iQkslZ dEisuls'ku ¯izlhiy ij vk/kfjr vLopkfyr rksyu midj.k gS A bldh vf/dre {kerk

200 xzk- U;wure {kerk 100 fd- xzk- gS A lR;kiu ekieku vUrjky (bZ) 1 fe- xzk- gS A blesa ,d vk/s;rqyu ;qfDr gS ftldk 'kr izfr'kr

O;dyukRed /kfjr vk/s;rqyu izHkko gS A fyfDoM fØLVu Mk;ksM (,y lh Mh) izn'kZ rksyu ifj.kke min£'kr djrk gS A midj.k 230

oksYV vkSj 50 gV~Zt izR;korhZ /kjk fo|qr iznk; ij dk;Z djrk gS A

vkÑfr&2 midj.k ds ekWMy dk lhfyax izko/ku

Ldsy dh ckMh ds gksYl esa ls lh¯yx ok;j fudky dj lh¯yx dh tkrh gS A ekWMy dks lhycan djus ds mica/ dk ,d iz:ih

;kstukc¼ Mk;xzke mQij fn;k x;k gS A

midj.k esa ckgjh dsfyczs'ku rd igqap dh lqfo/k gS A ckgjh dsfyczs'ku rd igqap dks jksdus ds fy, ,@Mh dkMZ@enj cksMZ esa fMi

fLop Hkh fn;k x;k gS A

vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj mDr vf/fu;e dh /kjk 36 dh mi&/kjk (12) }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, ;g ?kks"k.kk djrh

gS fd mDr ekWMy ds vuqeksnu ds bl izek.k&i=k ds varxZr mlh fofuekZrk }kjk mlh fl¼kar] fMtkbu ds vuqlkj vkSj mlh lkezxh ls ftlls

mDr vuqeksfnr ekWMy fofuekZ.k fd;k x;k gS] fofu£er mlh Ük`a[kyk ds oSls gh esd] ;FkkFkZrk vkSj dk;Zikyu ds rksyu midj.k Hkh gksaxs tks

1fe- xzk- ;k blls vf/d ds ¶bZ¸ eku ds fy, 50]000 ;k vf/d dh jsat esa lR;kiu ekieku varjky (,u) lfgr 50 fd-xzk- rd dh vf/

dre {kerk okys gSa vkSj ¶bZ¸ eku 1x10^ds] 2x10^ds] 5x10 ^ds] ds gSa] tks /ukRed ;k Í.kkRed iw.kk±d ;k 'kwU; ds lerqY; gSa A

¹iQk- la- MCY;w ,e&21(134)@2010º

ch- ,u- nhf{kr] funs'kd] fof/d eki foKku

1018

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 22nd November, 2010

S.O. 372.—Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed

authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the

provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and

Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of

sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the

Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non-automatic weighing

instrument (Table top type) with digital indication of specialAccuracy (Accuracy class -I) of Series ‘‘AP-200-4” and with

brand name ‘‘AVON” (hereinafter referred to as the said Model), maunfactured by M/s Avon Corporation Limited, 15,

‘B’ Wing, 2nd Floor, Kamal Kunj, S.V. Road, Andheri (W), Mumbai -400058 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/

09/10/235;

The said model is an electro magnetic force compensation based non-automatic weighing instrument with a

maximum capacity of 200g and minimum capacity of 100 mg. The verfication scale interval (e) is 1mg. It has a tare device

with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Liquid Crystal diode (LCD) display indicates the weighing results.

The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hz alternative current power supply.

Figure-1

Figure-2 Sealing Diagram

Sealing is done by pasing the sealing wire from the holes provided for sealing on both the side of the indicator. A

typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

The instrument has external control to calibration. A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board

to disable access to external calibration.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (12) of section 36 of the said, Act the Central

Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of

similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg. with verification scale interval (n)

50,000 or above for ‘e’ value of 1mg or more and with ‘e’ value of 1x10^k, 2x10^k, or 5x10^k, where k is a positive or negative

whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and

materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[ F. No.WM-21(134)/2010]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

1019

ubZ fnYyh] 22 uoEcj] 2010

dk-vk- 373-—dsUnzh; ljdkj dk] fofgr izkf/dkjh }kjk mls izLrqr fjiksVZ ij fopkj djus ds i'pkr~ ;g lek/ku gks x;k gS fd

mDr fjiksVZ esa o£.kr ekWMy (uhps nh xbZ vkÑfr ns[ksa) ckV vkSj eki ekud vf/fu;e] 1976 (1976 dk 60) rFkk ckV vkSj eki ekud

(ekWMyksa dk vuqeksnu) fu;e] 1987 ds mica/ksa ds vuq:i gS vkSj bl ckr dh laHkkouk gS fd yxkrkj iz;ksx dh vof/ esa Hkh mDr ekWMy

;FkkFkZrk cuk, j[ksxk vkSj fofHkUu ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa mi;qDr lsok iznku djrk jgsxk_

vr% vc dsUnzh; ljdkj] mDr vf/fu;e dh /kjk 36 dh mi&/kjk (7) vkSj mi&/kjk (8) }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs

gq, eSllZ ,ou dkjiksjs'ku fy-] 15 ch ¯ox] nwljk ry] dey dqat] ,l- oh- jksM] va/sjh osLV] eqacbZ&400 058 }kjk fofu£er mPp ;FkkFkZrk

(;FkkFkZrk oxZ&II) okys ^^, oh&902&6ds** Ük`a[kyk ds vadd lwpu lfgr vLopkfyr rksyu midj.k (VscyVki Vkbi) ds ekWMy dk]

ftlds czkaM dk uke ¶,ou¸ gS (ftls blesa blds i'pkr~ mDr ekWMy dgk x;k gS) vkSj ftls vuqeksnu fpÉ vkbZ ,u Mh@09@10@236

leuqnsf'kr fd;k x;k gS] vuqeksnu izek.k i=k tkjh djrh gS A

mDr ekWMy ,d foÑr xst izdkj dk Hkkj lsy vk/kfjr vLopkfyr rksyu midj.k (VscyVki izdkj) gS A bldh vf/dre

{kerk 6 fd-xzk- U;wure {kerk 25 xzk- gS A lR;kiu ekieku vUrjky (bZ) 5 xzk- gS A blesa ,d vk/s;rqyu ;qfDr gS ftldk 'kr izfr'kr

O;odyukRed /kfjr vk/s;rqyu izHkko gS A fyfDoM fØLVy Mk;ksM (,y lh Mh) izn'kZ rksyu ifj.kke min£'kr djrk gS A midj.k 230

oksYV vkSj 50 gV~Zt izR;korhZ /kjk fo|qr iznk; ij dk;Z djrk gS A

vkÑfr&2 midj.k ds ekWMy dk lhfyax izko/ku

baMhdsVj ds nksuksa rjiQ fn, x, lh¯yx ds fy, fn, gksYl esa ls lh¯yx ok;j fudky dj lh¯yx dh tkrh gS A ekWMy dks lhycan

djus ds mica/ dk ,d iz:ih ;kstukc¼ Mk;xzke mQij fn;k x;k gS A

midj.k esa ckgjh dsfyczs'ku rd igqap dh lqfo/k gS A ckgjh dsfyczs'ku rd igqap dks jksdus ds fy, ,@Mh dkMZ@enj cksMZ esa fMi

fLop Hkh fn;k x;k gS A

vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj mDr vf/fu;e dh /kjk 36 dh mi&/kjk (12) }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, ;g ?kks"k.kk djrh

gS fd mDr ekWMy ds vuqeksnu ds bl izek.k&i=k ds varxZr mlh fofuekZrk }kjk mlh fl¼kar] fMtkbu ds vuqlkj vkSj mlh lkexzh ls ftlls

mDr vuqeksfnr ekWMy fofuekZ.k fd;k x;k gS] fofu£er mlh Ük`a[kyk ds oSls gh esd] ;FkkFkZrk vkSj dk;Zikyu ds rksyu midj.k Hkh gksaxs tks

1fe- xzk- ls 50 fe- xzk- rd ds ¶bZ¸ eku ds fy, 100 ls 50]000 rd dh jsat esa lR;kiu ekieku varjky (,u) vkSj 100 fe- xzk- ;k mlls

vf/d ds ¶bZ¸ eku ds fy, 5000 ls 50]000 rd dh jsat esa lR;kiu ekieku varjky (,u) lfgr 50 fd-xzk- rd dh vf/dre {kerk

okys gSa vkSj ¶bZ¸ eku 1x10^ds] 2x10^ds ] 5x10^ds] ds gSa] tks /ukRed ;k Í.kkRed iw.kk±d ;k 'kwU; ds lerqY; gSa A

¹iQk- la- MCY;w ,e&21(134)@2010º

ch- ,u- nhf{kr] funs'kd] fof/d eki foKku

1020

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 22nd November, 2010

S.O. 373.—Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed

authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the

provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and

Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of

sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the

Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non-automatic weighing

instrument (Table top type) with digital indication of High Accuracy (Accuracy class -II) of Series ‘‘AV-902-6K” and with

brand name ‘‘AVON” (hereinafter referred to as the said Model), maunfactured by M/s. Avon Corporation Limited, 15, ‘B’

Wing, 2nd Floor, Kamal Kunj, S.V. Road, Andheri (W), Mumbai -400 058 which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/10/

236;

The said model is a strain gauge load cell based non-automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with a

maximum capacity of 6Kg. and minimum capacity of 25g. The verfication scale interval (e) is 0.5g. It has a tare device with

a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect. The Liquid Crystal Diode (LCD) display indicates the weighing results. The

instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure-1 Model

Figure-2 Sealing Diagram

Sealing is done by pasing the sealing wire from the holes provided for sealing on both the side of the indicator. A

typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

The instrument has external control to calibration. A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board

to disable access to external calibration.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (12) of Section 36 of the said, Act the Central

Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of

similar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg. and with number verification scale interval

(n) in the range of 100 to 50000 for ‘e’ value of 1mg. to 50mg. and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range

of 5000 to 50,000 for ‘e’ value of 100mg. or more and with ‘e’ value 1x10^k, 2x10^k or 5x10^k, k being the positive or negative

whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and

with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[ F. No.WM-21(134)/2010]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

1021

ubZ fnYyh] 9 fnlEcj] 2010

dk-vk- 374-—dsUnzh; ljdkj dk] fofgr izkf/dkjh }kjk mls izLrqr fjiksVZ ij fopkj djus ds i'pkr~ ;g lek/ku gks x;k gS fd

mDr fjiksVZ esa o£.kr ekWMy (uhps nh xbZ vkÑfr ns[ksa) ckV vkSj eki ekud vf/fu;e] 1976(1976 dk 60) rFkk ckV vkSj eki ekud

(ekWMyksa dk vuqeksnu) fu;e] 1987 ds mica/ksa ds vuq:i gSa vkSj bl ckr dh laHkkouk gS fd yxkrkj iz;ksx dh vof/ esa Hkh mDr ekWMy

;FkkFkZrk cuk, j[ksxk vkSj fofHkUu ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa mi;qDr lsok iznku djrk jgsxk_

vr% vc dsUnzh; ljdkj] mDr vf/fu;e dh /kjk 36 dh mi&/kjk (7) vkSj mi&/kjk (8) }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs

gq, eSllZ VSd flLVe] 17] ;'kksT;ksfr lkslk;Vh] Mh ,u lh gkbZ Ldwy ds ihNs] MksEchosYyh (bZ) eqacbZ&421201 }kjk fofu£er e?;e ;FkkFkZrk

(;FkkFkZrk oxZ&III) okys ^^ih,yVh&11** Ük`a[kyk ds vadd lwpu lfgr vLopkfyr rksyu midj.k (VscyVki Vkbi) ds ekWMy dk] ftlds

czkaM dk uke ¶Iykuj¸ gS (ftls blesa blds i'pkr~ mDr ekWMy dgk x;k gS) vkSj ftls vuqeksnu fpÉ vkbZ ,u Mh@09@10@104 leuqnsf'kr

fd;k x;k gS] vuqeksnu izek.k i=k tkjh djrh gS A

mDr ekWMy ,d foÑr xst izdkj dk Hkkj lsy vk/kfjr vLopkfyr rksyu midj.k (VscyVki izdkj) gS A bldh vf/dre

{kerk 30 fd-xzk- vkSj U;wure {kerk 100 xzk- gS A lR;kiu ekieku vUrjky (bZ) 5 xzk- gS A blesa ,d vk/s;rqyu ;qfDr gS ftldk 'kr

izfr'kr O;odyukRed /kfjr vk/s;rqyu izHkko gS A izdk'k mRltZd Mk;ksM (,y bZ Mh) izn'kZ rksyu ifj.kke min£'kr djrk gS A midj.k

230 oksYV vkSj 50 gV~tZ izR;korhZ /kjk fo|qr iznk; ij dk;Z djrk gS A

vkÑfr&2 ekWMy dks lhfyax djus dk ;kstukc¼ Mk;xzke

ckWVe IysV vkSj VkWi doj esa cuk, x, Nsnksa esa ls vkSj Ldsy dh ckMh esa ls lh¯yx ok;j fudky dj lh¯yx dh tkrh gS A ekWMy

dks lhycan djus ds mica/ dk ,d iz:ih ;kstukc¼ Mk;xzke mQij fn;k x;k gS A

midj.k esa ckgjh dsfyczs'ku rd igqap dh lqfo/k gS A ckgjh dsfyczs'ku rd igqap dks jksdus ds fy, ,@Mh dkMZ@enj cksMZ esa fMi

fLop Hkh fn;k x;k gS A

vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj mDr vf/fu;e dh /kjk 36 dh mi&/kjk (12) }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, ;g ?kks"k.kk djrh

gS fd mDr ekWMy ds vuqeksnu ds bl izek.k&i=k ds varxZr mlh fofuekZrk }kjk mlh fl¼kar] fMtkbu ds vuqlkj vkSj mlh lkexzh ls ftlls

mDr vuqeksfnr ekWMy fofuekZ.k fd;k x;k gS] fofu£er mlh Ük`a[kyk ds oSls gh esd] ;FkkFkZrk vkSj dk;Zikyu ds rksyu midj.k Hkh gksaxs tks

100 fe- xzk- ls 2 xzk- rd ds ¶bZ¸ eku ds fy, 100 ls 10]000 rd dh jsat esa lR;kiu ekieku varjky (,u) vkSj 5 xzk- ;k mlls

vf/d ds ¶bZ¸ eku ds fy, 500 ls 10]000 rd dh jsat esa lR;kiu ekieku varjky (,u) lfgr 50 fd-xzk- rd dh vf/dre {kerk

okys gSa vkSj ¶bZ¸ eku 1x10^ds] 2x10^ds ] 5x10 ^ds] ds gSa] tks /ukRed ;k Í.kkRed iw.kk±d 'kwU; ds lerqY; gSa A

¹iQk- la- MCY;w ,e&21(31)@2010º

ch- ,u- nhf{kr] funs'kd] fof/d eki foKku

1022

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 9th December, 2010

S.O. 374.—Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed

authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the

provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and

Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of

sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the

Central Government hereby approves and issues the certificate of approval of the model of non-authomatic weighing

instrument (Table top type) with digital indication belonging to Medium Accuracy (Accuracy class -III) of Series

‘‘PLT-11” and with brand name ‘‘PLANNER” (hereinafter referred to as the said Model), maunfactured by M/s TEC

Systems, 17, Yashojyoti Society, B/H.D.N.C. High School, Dombivalli (E), Mumbai -421 201 which is assigned the approval

mark IND/09/10/104;

The said model is a strain gauge load cell based non-automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with a

maximum capacity of 30Kg. and minimum capacity of 100g. The verfication scale interval (e) is 5g. It has a tare device

with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result.

The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure-1 Model

Figure-2 Sealing arrangement

Sealing is done by passing the sealing wire from the body of the scale through holes made in the bottom plate and

top cover. A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

The instrument has external control to calibration. A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board

to disable access to external calibration.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of

similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg. and with number of verification

scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10000 for ‘e’ value of 100mg. to 2g. and with number of verification scale interval (n)

in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ‘e’ value of 5g. or more and with ‘e’ value 1x10^k, 2x10^k or 5x10^k, k being the positive or

negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle,

design and materials with which, the approved model has been manufactured.

[ F. No.WM-21/(31)/2010]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

1023

ubZ fnYyh] 9 fnlEcj] 2010

dk-vk- 375-—dsUnzh; ljdkj dk] fofgr izkf/dkjh }kjk mls izLrqr fjiksVZ ij fopkj djus ds i'pkr~ ;g lek/ku gks x;k gS fd

mDr fjiksVZ esa o£.kr ekWMy (uhps nh xbZ vkÑfr ns[ksa) ckV vkSj eki ekud vf/fu;e] 1976(1976 dk 60) rFkk ckV vkSj eki ekud

(ekWMyksa dk vuqeksnu) fu;e] 1987 ds mica/ksa ds vuq:i gSa vkSj bl ckr dh laHkkouk gS fd yxkrkj iz;ksx dh vof/ esa Hkh mDr ekWMy

;FkkFkZrk cuk, j[ksxk vkSj fofHkUu ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa mi;qDr lsok iznku djrk jgsxk_

vr%] vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] mDr vf/fu;e dh /kjk 36 dh mi&/kjk (7) vkSj mi&/kjk (8) }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs

gq, eSllZ VSd flLVe] 17] ;'kksT;ksfr lkslk;Vh] Mh ,u lh gkbZ Ldwy ds ihNs] MksEchosYyh (bZ) eqacbZ&421201 }kjk fofu£er e?;e ;FkkFkZrk

(;FkkFkZrk oxZ&III) okys ^^ih,yih,iQ** Ük`a[kyk ds vadd lwpu lfgr vLopkfyr rksyu midj.k (IysViQkeZ Vkbi) ds ekWMy dk] ftlds

czkaM dk uke ¶Iykuj¸ gS (ftls blesa blds i'pkr~ mDr ekWMy dgk x;k gS) vkSj ftls vuqeksnu fpÉ vkbZ ,u Mh@09@10@105 leuqnsf'kr

fd;k x;k gS] vuqeksnu izek.k&i=k tkjh djrh gS A

mDr ekWMy ,d foÑr xst izdkj dk Hkkj lsy vk/kfjr vLopkfyr rksyu midj.k (IysViQkeZ Vkbi) gS A bldh vf/dre

{kerk 500 fd-xzk- U;wure {kerk 1 fd- xzk- gS A lR;kiu ekieku vUrjky (bZ) 50 xzk- gS A blesa ,d vk/s;rqyu ;qfDr gS ftldk

'kr&izfr'kr O;dyukRed /kfjr vk/s;rqyu izHkko gS A izdk'k mRltZd Mk;ksM (,y bZ Mh) izn'kZ rksyu ifj.kke min£'kr djrk gS A

midj.k 230 oksYV vkSj 50 gV~Zt izR;korhZ /kjk fo|qr iznk; ij dk;Z djrk gS A

vkÑfr&2 ekWMy dks lhfyax djus dk ;kstukc¼ Mk;xzke

fMLIys dh ckWMh esa ls lh¯yx ok;j fudky dj lh¯yx dh xbZ gS A e'khu dks diViw.kZ O;ogkjksa ls jksdus ds fy, lh¯yx dh xbZ

gS A ekWMy dks lhycan djus ds mica/ dk ,d iz:ih ;kstukc¼ Mk;xzke mQij fn;k x;k gS A

midj.k esa ckgjh dsfyczs'ku rd igqap dh lqfo/k gS A ckgjh dsfyczs'ku rd igqap dks jksdus ds fy, ,@Mh dkMZ@enj cksMZ esa fMi

fLop Hkh fn;k x;k gS A

vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj mDr vf/fu;e dh /kjk 36 dh mi&/kjk (12) }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, ;g ?kks"k.kk djrh

gS fd mDr ekWMy ds vuqeksnu ds bl izek.ki=k ds varxZr mlh fofuekZrk }kjk mlh fl¼kar] fMtkbu ds vuqlkj vkSj mlh lkexzh ls ftlls

mDr vuqeksfnr ekWMy dk fofuekZ.k fd;k x;k gS] fofu£er mlh Ük`a[kyk ds oSls gh esd] ;FkkFkZrk vkSj dk;Zikyu ds rksyu midj.k Hkh gksaxs

tks 5 xzk- ;k mlls vf/d ds ¶bZ¸ eku ds fy, 500 ls 10]000 rd dh jsat esa lR;kiu ekieku varjky (,u)

lfgr 50 fd-xzk- ls 5000 fd- xzk- rd dh vf/dre {kerk okys gSa vkSj ¶bZ¸ eku 1x10^ds] 2x10^ds 5x10 ^ds] ds gSa] tks /ukRed ;k Í.kkRed

iw.kk±d ;k 'kwU; ds lerqY; gSa A

¹iQk- la- MCY;w ,e&21(31)@2010º

ch- ,u- nhf{kr] funs'kd] fof/d eki foKku

1024

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 9th December, 2010

S.O. 375.—Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed

authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the

provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and

Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of

sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the

Central Government hereby approves and issues the certificate of approval of the model of non-automatic weighing

instrument (Platform type) with digital indication of Medium Accuracy (Accuracy class-III) of Series

‘‘PLPF” and with brand name ‘‘PLANNER” (hereinafter referred to as the said Model), maunfactured by M/s. TEC

Systems, 17, Yashojyoti Society, B/H.D.N.C. High School, Dombivalli (E), Mumbai -421201 which is assigned the approval

mark IND/09/10/105;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non-automatic weighing instrument (Platform type) with a

maximum capacity of 500Kg. and minimum capacity of 1kg. The verfication scale interval (e) is 50g. It has a tare device

with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect. The light emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result.

The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 1

Figure-2 Sealing arrangement

Sealing is done by pasing the sealing wire from the body of the display. Sealing is done to prevent the opening

of the machine for fraudulent practices. A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

The instrument has external control to calibration. A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board

to disable access to external calibration.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (12) of Section 36 of the said, Act, the Central

Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of

similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg. up to 5000kg. with verification

scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ‘e’ value of 5g. or more and with ‘e’ value 1x10^k, 2x10^k,or 5x10^k, where

k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the

same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[ F. No.WM-21/(31)/2010]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology

1028

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 9th December, 2010

S.O. 377.—Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority,

is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of

the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and

Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of

sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the

Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non-automatic weighing

instrument (Spring Balance Hanging & Dial Type) with analogue indication of ordinary Accuracy (Accuracy class -IIII)

of Series ‘‘APSB” and with brand name ‘‘APOLO” (hereinafter referred to as the said Model), maunfactured by M/s. Apolo

Scale Works, 16/A-1, Pili Kothi, Near Chatta Police Station, Chatta Bazar, Agra (UP) and which is assigned the approval

mark IND/09/10/243;

The said model is a spring based mechanical non-automatic weighing instrument (Spring Balance Hanging &

Dial Type) with a maximum capacity of 25Kg and minimum capacity of 1kg. The verification scale interval (e) is 100g. The

indication is of analogue type on a dial indicator.

Figure- 1

Figure-2 Schematic diagram of the Sealing arrangement

Sealing can be done by applying lead & seal wire through the holes provided on the bottam plat and top cover of

the instrument. Sealing shall be done to prevent opening of the weighing machine for fraudulent practice. A typical

schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub-section (12) of section 36 of the said, Act, the Central

Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of

similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 100kg with verification scale interval

(n) in the range of 100 to 1000 for ‘e’ value of 5g or more and with ‘e’ value of 1x10^k, 2x10^k,or 5x10^k, where k is a positive

or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle,

design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[ F. No.WM-21/(135)/2010]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

1029

dks;yk ea=kky;

vkns'k

ubZ fnYyh] 21 tuojh ] 2011

dk-vk- 378-—dks;yk /kjd {ks=k (vtZu vkSj fodkl) vf/fu;e] 1957 (1957 dk 20) (ftls blesa blds i'pkr~ mDr

vf/fu;e dgk x;k gS) dh /kjk 9 dh mi&/kjk (1) ds v/hu tkjh dh xbZ Hkkjr ljdkj ds dks;yk ea=kky; dh vf/lwpuk la[;kas

dk-vk- 1489 rkjh[k 3 twu] 2010 tks Hkkjr ds jkti=k] Hkkx II [kaM 3] mi&[kaM (ii) rkjh[k 12 twu] 2010 esa izdkf'kr dh xbZ Fkh] mDr

vf/lwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa o£.kr Hkwfe vkSj Hkwfe esa ;k ml ij ds lHkh vf/dkj (ftls blesa blds i'pkr~ mDr Hkwfe dgk x;k gS) mDr

vf/fu;e dh /kjk 10 dh mi&/kjk (1) ds v/hu lHkh foYyaxeksa ls eqDr gksdj] vkR;kafrd :i ls dsUnzh; ljdkj esa fufgr gks x, Fks_

vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj dk ;g lek/ku gks x;k gS fd lkmFk bZLVuZ dksyiQhYM~l fyfeVsM] fcykliqj (ftls blesa blds i'pkr mDr

ljdkjh dEiuh dgk x;k gS) ,sls fuca/uksa vkSj 'krksZa dk tks dsUnzh; ljdkj bl fufeÙk vf/jksfir djuk mfpr le>s] vuqikyu djus ds fy;s

jtkean gS _

vr%] vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] mDr vf/fu;e dh /kjk 11 dh mi&/kjk (1) }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] ;g funs'k nsrh

gS fd bl izdkj fufgr mDr 291-285 gsDVj Hkwfe vkSj ml ij ds lHkh vf/dkj] rkjh[k 12 twu 2010 ls dsUnzh; ljdkj esa bl izdkj fufgr

cus jgus dh ctk;] fuEufyf[kr fuca/uksa 'krksZa ds v/hu jgrs gq,] mDr ljdkjh dEiuh esa fufgr gks tk,axs] vFkkZr~ %&

1- ljdkjh dEiuh] mDr vf/fu;e ds mica/ksa ds v/hu ;Fkk vo/kfjr izfrdj] C;kt] uqdlku vkSj oSlh gh enksa dh ckcr fd,

x, lHkh lank;ksa dh dsUnzh; ljdkj dks izfriw£r djsxh_

2- ljdkjh dEiuh }kjk 'krZ (1) ds v/hu] dsUnzh; ljdkj dks lans; jdeksa dk vo/kj.k djus ds iz;kstu ds fy;s mDr vf/fu;e

dh /kjk 14 ds v/hu ,d vf/dj.k dk xBu fd;k tk,xk rFkk ,sls fdlh vf/dj.k vkSj ,sls vf/dj.k dh lgk;rk djus ds fy;s fu;qDr

O;fDr;ksa ds laca/ksa esa mixr lHkh O;;] mDr ljdkjh dEiuh }kjk ogu fd;s tk;saxs vkSj blh izdkj fufgr mDr Hkwfe esa ;k ml ij ds

vf/dkj ds fy;s ;k mlds laca/ esa tSls vihy vkfn lHkh fof/d dk;Zokfg;kas dh ckcr mixr lHkh O;; Hkh] blh izdkj mDr ljdkjh

dEiuh }kjk ogu fd;s tk;saxs_

3- ljdkjh dEiuh] dsUnzh; ljdkj ;k mlds ink/kfj;ksa dh] ,sls fdlh vU; O;; ds laca/ esa] {kfriw£r djsxh tks bl izdkj fufgr

mDr Hkwfe esa ;k ml ij ds vf/dkjksa ds ckjs esa dsUnzh; ljdkj ;k mlds in/kfj;ksa }kjk ;k muds fo:} fdUgh dk;Zokfg;ksa ds laca/ esa

vko';d gks_

4- ljdkjh dEiuh dks] dsUnzh; ljdkj ds iwoZ vuqeksnu ds fcuk] mDr Hkwfe vkSj vf/dkj dks fdlh vU; O;fDr dks varfjr djus

dh 'kfDr ugha gksxh_ vkSj

5- ljdkjh dEiuh] ,sls funs'kksa vkSj 'krksZa dk] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj }kjk tc dHkh vko';d gks] mDr Hkwfe ds fof'k"V {ks=kksa ds fy;s

fn, tk,a ;k vf/jksfir dh tk,] ikyu djsxh A

¹iQk- la- 43015@25@2008&ihvkjvkbZMCY;w &1º

,l- lh- HkkfV;k] funs'kd

MINISTRY OF COAL

ORDER

New Delhi, the 21st January, 2011

S.O. 378.— Whereas, on the publication of the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Coal

number S.O.1489, dated the 3rd June, 2010, published in the Gazette of India, Part-II, Section-3, Sub-section (ii) dated the

12th June 2010, issued under sub-section (1) of Section 9 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act,

1957 (20 of 1957), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), the lands as all rights in or over the land described in the Schedule

appended to the said notification (hereinafter referred to as the said land) vested absolutely in the Central Government free

from all encumbrances under sub-section (1) of Section 10 of the said Act;

And whereas, the Central Government is satisfied that the South Eastern Coalfields Limited, Bilaspur (hereinafter

referred to as the Government Company) is willing to comply with such terms and conditions as the Central Government

thinks fit to impose in this behalf ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 11 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby directs that the all rights of 291.285 hectares land in or over the said lands so vested shall with effect

from 12th June, 2010 instead of continuing to so vest in the Central Government, vest in the Government Company, subject

to the following terms and conditions, namely :—

The Government Company shall reimburse to the Central Government all payments made in respect of

compensation, interest, damages and the like, as determined under the provisions of the said Act ;

A Tribunal shall be constituted under section 14 of the said Act, for the purpose of determining the amounts

payable to the Central Government by the Government Company under conditions (1) and all expenditure incurred in

1030

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

connection with any such tribunal and persons appointed to assist the tribunal shall be borne by the Government Company

and similarly, all expenditure incurred in respect of all legal proceedings like appeals, etc. for or in connection with the rights,

in or over the said lands, so vested, shall also be borne by the Government Company ;

The Government company shall indemnify the Central Government or its officials against any other

expenditure that may be necessary in connection with any proceedings by or against the Central Government or its officials

regarding the rights in or over the said lands so vested ;

The Government Company shall have no power to transfer the said land and the rights to any other persons

without the prior approval of the Central Government ; and

The Government Company shall abide by such direction and conditions as may be given or imposed by the

Central Government for particular areas of the said lands, as and when necessary.

[F. No.-43015/25/2008-PRIW-I]

S. C. BHATIA, Director

isVªksfy;e vkSj izkÑfrd xSl ea=kky;

ubZ fnYyh] 21 tuojh ] 2011

dk-vk- 379-—dsUnzh; ljdkj] jktHkk"kk (la?k ds 'kkldh; iz;kstuksa ds fy, iz;ksx) fu;e] 1976 ds fu;e 10 ds mifu;e (4)

ds vuqlj.k esa isVªksfy;e vkSj izkÑfrd xSl ea=kky; ds iz'kklfud fu;a=k.kk/hu lkoZtfud {ks=k ds miØeksa ds fuEufyf[kr dk;kZy;ksa dks]

ftuds 80 ;k vf/d izfr'kr deZpkjho`Un us ¯gnh dk dk;Zlk/d Kku izkIr dj fy;k gS] vf/lwfpr djrh gS%&

fgUnqLrku isVªksfy;e dkiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM

mÙkj if'pe vapy & ,yihth

djkdk fc¯YMx] uVjkt flusek ds ikl]

vkJe jksM] vgenkckn & 380 009

xsy (bafM;k) fyfeVsM

vkapfyd dk;kZy;

7,] dsUll ikoj] 1 jkeÑ".k ekxZ

ukFkZ mLeku jksM] Vh uxj] psUubZ & 600017

th&10@8] inenhi Vkoj

r`rh; ry] lat; Iysl]

,e- th- jksM] vkxjk&282002

¹ la- 11011@1@2011 (¯gnh)º

tkudh vkgwtk] mi funs'kd (jk-Hkk-)

MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS

New Delhi, the 21st January, 2011

S.O. 379.— In pursuance of Sub Rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (Use for official porposes of the

Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government hereby notifies the following offices of the Public Sector Undertakings under

the administrative control of the Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas, in which 80 or more per cent of the staff have acquired

working Knowledge of Hindi:—

Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited

North -West Zone - LPG

Karaka Building, Near Natraj Cinema,

Ashram Road, Ahmedabad - 380009

Gail (India) Limited

Zonal Office,

7A, Kensas Power, I Ramakrishna Marg,

North Usman Road, T. Nagar, Chennai -600017

G-10/8, Padamdeep Tower

3rd Floor, Sanjay place

MG Road, Agra -282002

[ No.-11011/1/2011 (Hindi)]

JANKI AHUJA, Dy. Director (OL)

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

1031

ubZ fnYyh] 31 tuojh] 2011

dk-vk- 380-—dsUnzh; ljdkj dks yksdfgr esa ;g vko';d

izrhr gksrk gS fd ikjknhi (mM+hlk) ls jk;iqj (NÙkhlx<+) ,oa

jk¡ph (>kj[k.M) rd isVªksfy;e mRiknksa ds ifjogu ds fy;s

bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM }kjk ¶ikjknhi&lEcyiqj&jk;iqj&

jk¡ph ikbiykbu¸ fcNkbZ tkuh pkfg;s_

vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj dks mDr ikbiykbu fcNkus ds iz;kstu

ds fy, ;g vko';d izrhr gksrk gS fd ,slh Hkwfe] ftlds uhps

ikbiykbu fcNk, tkus dk izLrko gS vkSj tks bl vf/lwpuk ls

mikc¼ vuqlwph esa o£.kr gS] esa mi;ksx ds vf/dkj dk vtZu

fd;k tk,_

vr%] vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbu

(Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/dkj dk vtZu) vfèkfu;e] 1962 (1962

dk 50) dh /kjk 3 dh mi&/kjk (1) }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx

djrs gq,] muesa mi;ksx ds vf/dkj dk vtZu djus ds vius

vk'k; dh ?kks"k.k djrh gS_

dksbZ O;fDr] tks mDr vuqlwph esa o£.kr Hkwfe esa fgrc¼ gS]

ml rkjh[k ls ftldks Hkkjr ds jkti=k esa ;Fkk izdkf'kr bl

vfèklwpuk dh izfr;k¡ lk/kj.k turk dks miyC/ djk nh tkrh gSa]

bDdhl fnu ds Hkhrj] Hkwfe ds uhps ikbiykbu fcNk, tkus ds

fy,] mlesa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu djus ds laca/ esa

Jh izse pUn oekZ] l{ke izkf/dkjh] bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku

fyfeVsM] ikjknhi&lEcyiqj&jk;iqj&jk¡ph ikbiykbu ifj;kstuk]

xzkmaM Ýyksj] ch&CykWd] 'kkgnso Vkoj] ih-ih- dEikmUM]

jk¡ph&834001 (>kj[k.M) dks fyf[kr :i esa vk{ksi Hkst ldsxk A

vuqlwph

vapyµjfu;k

ftykµ[kawzVh

jkT;µ>kj[k.M

xkao dk uke

IykV la-

{ks=kiQy

gsDVs;j

,;j

oxZ

ehVj

xksgkje&131

1711

1331

1373

1360

1372

1371

1379

1380

1367

1389

1391

1368

xksgkje&131

1392

1393

1088

1087

1086

1084

1083

1076

1077

1078

1080

1094

1093

1095

1099

1098

1097

1104

1260

1105

1106

1009

1102

1259

1186

1184

1178

1180

1734

1189

1183

1181

1173

1182

1172

1166

1164

1191

1185

1032

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

xksgkje&131

1134

1133

1129

1128

1127

1126

1109

1108

1132

dksVkaxsj-130

609

608

628

606

607

605

633

601

602

600

599

598

586

597

596

588

587

589

577

dksVkaxsj-130

578

576

579

574

575

551

552

553

558

559

560

482

481

480

479

467

468

466

470

455

456

458

454

460

310

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

1033

dksVkaxsj-130

115

3939

124

fMxjh-99

2317

2293

2292

2289

2287

2286

2284

2282

2283

2280

2281

2300

2301

2305

2307

2311

2308

2185

2176

2173

2175

2321

2324

2488

2326

2340

2339

2338

2341

2342

2345

2346

fMxjh-99

2347

2348

2350

2358

2359

2360

2355

2399

2398

2397

2378

2396

2383

2382

2381

2380

3103

3104

3101

3099

3106

3108

3122

3129

3130

3131

3070

3135

3132

3065

3047

3134

3046

3045

3127

3077

xjbZ&100

138

137

140

141

181

155

156

1034

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

xjbZ&100

157

180

178

158

179

159

177

160

161

164

173

167

170

169

649

651

655

650

645

644

643

642

439

456

457

459

460

455

454

465

466

464

468

474

488

473

472

471

491

490

489

515

511

xjbZ&100

526

527

528

530

536

535

537

538

505

540

541

1114

453

154

rksdsu-129

225

210

224

223

217

220

218

320

278

279

275

274

272

264

265

384

611

612

613

615

610

609

581

603

583

602

601

600

599

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

1035

rksdsu-129

590

589

dqYgbZ-128

806

805

876

879

890

896

901

900

899

915

913

916

917

929

919

918

928

927

949

1120

1121

1122

1118

1117

1110

1123

1105

1108

1106

1107

1053

1054

1055

1057

1056

1180

1189

1228

1229

1230

1243

dqYgbZ-128

1241

1242

1240

1244

1237

1235

1234

1255

Vaxjdsyk-127

787

788

782

780

759

758

757

756

755

665

666

667

668

669

670

672

671

647

650

649

635

595

594

lhne-106

663

662

660

659

639

[kVaxk-126

182

181

178

177

179

175

187

1036

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

[kVaxk-126

174

166

173

168

170

169

167

136

137

135

134

133

dksM+kdsy-108

222

221

220

219

229

218

217

230

215

214

213

208

209

207

206

205

199

201

200

172

190

189

173

174

175

153

dksM+kdsy-108

152

154

155

140

127

134

133

128

129

131

132

113

108

109

110

171

505

506

507

597

600

601

612

616

617

652

651

649

650

648

647

646

645

632

635

636

631

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

1037

cubZ-107

2024

2012

2022

2013

2008

2016

1991

1990

1989

1988

1985

1987

2026

dsyks-110

100

101

102

103

123

117

116

121

168

169

167

179

164

159

158

dsyks-110

152

207

214

213

215

216

217

783

786

787

780

781

359

360

361

364

362

363

372

374

375

350

349

380

382

384

385

388

435

391

392

434

393

433

401

402

404

405

400

151

[iQk- la- vkj&25011@4@2011&vks vkj&1]

ch- ds- nÙkk] voj lfpo

1038

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 31st January, 2011

S.O. 380.—Whereas, it appears to the Central

Government that it is necessary in the public interest that

for the transportation of petroleum products from Paradip

(Orissa) to Raipur (Chhattisgarh) and Ranchi (Jharkhand),

a “Paradip- Sambalpur-Raipur-Ranchi Pipeline” should be

laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And whereas, it appears to the Central Government

that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is

necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described

in the schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and

Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land)

Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby

declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the

said schedule may, within twenty-one days from the date

on which the copies of this notification, as published in

the Gazette of India, are made available to the General

Public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of

user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to

Shri Prem Chandra Verma, Competent Authority, Indian

Oil Corporation Limited, Paradip - Sambalpur -Raipur -

Ranchi Pipeline Project, Ground floor, B-Block, Shahdeo

Tower, P.P. Compound, Ranchi-834001 (Jharkhand)

SCHEDULE

Anchal : Rania

District : Kunti

State : Jharkhand

Name of the

Plot No.

Area

Village

Hectare Are Sq. mtr.

Goharam-131

1711

1331

1373

1360

1372

1371

1379

1380

1367

1389

1391

1368

1392

1393

1088

1087

1086

Goharam-131

1084

1083

1076

1077

1078

1080

1094

1093

1095

.02

1099

1098

1097

1104

1260

1105

1106

1009

1102

1259

1186

1184

1178

1180

1734

1189

1183

1181

1173

1182

1172

1166

1164

1191

1185

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

1039

Goharam-131

1134

1133

1129

1128

1127

1126

1109

1108

1132

Kotanger-130

609

608

628

606

607

605

633

601

602

600

599

598

586

597

596

588

587

589

577

578

576

579

574

Kotanger-130

575

551

552

553

558

559

560

482

481

480

479

467

468

466

470

455

456

458

454

460

310

1040

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Kotanger-130

115

3939

124

Digri-99

2317

2293

2292

2289

2287

2286

2284

2282

2283

2280

2281

2300

2301

2305

2307

2311

2308

2185

2176

2173

2175

2321

2324

2488

2326

2340

2339

2338

2341

2342

2345

2346

2347

2348

Digri-99

2350

2358

2359

2360

2355

2399

2398

2397

2378

2396

2383

2382

2381

2380

3103

3104

3101

3099

3106

3108

3122

3129

3130

3131

3070

3135

3132

3065

3047

. 3134

3046

3045

3127

3077

Garai-100

138

137

140

141

181

155

156

157

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

1041

Garai-100

180

178

158

179

159

177

160

161

164

173

167

170

169

649

651

655

650

645

644

643

642

439

456

457

459

460

455

454

465

466

464

468

474

488

473

472

471

491

490

489

515

511

526

Garai-100

527

528

530

536

535

537

538

505

540

541

1114

.05

453

154

Toekn-129

225

210

224

223

217

220

218

320

278

279

275

274

272

264

265

384

611

612

613

615

610

609

581

603

583

602

601

600

599

590

589

1042

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Kulhai-128

806

805

876

879

890

896

901

900

899

915

913

916

917

929

919

918

928

927

949

1120

1121

1122

1118

1117

1110

1123

1105

1108

1106

1107

.04

1053

1054

1055

1057

1056

1180

1189

1228

1229

1230

1243

1241

1242

Kulhai-128

1240

1244

1237

1235

1234

1255

Tangarkela-127

787

788

782

780

759

758

757

756

755

665

666

667

668

669

670

672

671

647

650

649

635

595

594

Sidam-106

663

662

660

659

639

Khatanga-126

182

181

178

177

179

175

187

174

166

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

1043

Khatanga-126

173

168

170

169

167

136

137

135

134

133

Korakel-108

222

221

220

219

229

218

217

230

215

214

213

208

209

207

206

205

199

201

200

172

190

189

173

174

175

153

152

Korakel-108

154

155

140

127

134

133

128

129

131

132

113

108

109

110

171

505

506

507

597

600

601

612

616

617

652

651

649

650

648

647

646

645

632

635

636

631

1044

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Banai-107

2024

2012

2022

2013

2008

2016

1991

1990

1989

1988

1985

1987

2026

Kelo-110

100

101

102

103

123

117

116

121

168

169

167

179

164

159

158

Kelo-110

152

207

214

213

215

216

217

783

786

787

780

781

359

360

361

364

362

363

372

374

375

350

349

380

382

384

385

388

435

391

392

434

393

433

401

402

404

405

400

151

152

[F. No. R-25011/4/2011-OR-1]

B. K. DATTA, Under Secy.

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

1045

ubZ fnYyh] 31 tuojh] 2011

dk-vk- 381-—dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slk izrhr gksrk gS fd

yksd fgr esa ;g vko';d gS fd xqtjkr jkT; esa lyk;k ls mÙkj

izns'k jkT; esa eFkqjk rd isVªksfy;e ØqM ds ifjogu ds fy;s

¶lyk;k&eFkqjk ikbiykbu ds vUrxZr Mh&okWVyus¯dx ifj;kstuk**

ds dk;kZUo;u gsrq bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM }kjk ,d

ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkuh pkfg,_

vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj dks mDr ikbiykbu fcNkus ds iz;kstu

ds fy, ;g izrhr gksrk gS fd mDr Hkwfe esa] ftlds Hkhrj mDr

ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkus dk izLrko gS vkSj tks bl vf/lwpuk ls

layXu vuqlwph esa o£.kr gS] esa mi;ksx ds vf/dkj dk vtZu fd;k

tk,_

vr% vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbu

(Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/dkj dk vtZu) vfèkfu;e] 1962 (1962

dk 50) dh /kjk 3 dh mi&/kjk (1) }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx

djrs gq,] mDr Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/dkj dk vtZu djus ds

vius vk'k; dh ?kks"k.k djrh gS_

dksbZ O;fDr] tks mDr vuqlwph esa o£.kr Hkwfe ls fgrc¼ gS]

ml rkjh[k ls] ftldks Hkkjr ds jkti=k esa ;Fkk izdkf'kr bl

vfèklwpuk dh izfr;k¡ tulk/kj.k dks miyC/ djk nh tkrh gSa]

bDdhl fnu ds Hkhrj] mlesa mi;ksx ds vf/dkj dk vtZu djus

;k Hkwfe ds uhps ikbiykbu fcNk, tkus ds laca/ esa Jh Hkhe ¯lg]

l{ke izkf/dkjh] bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM] ikbiykbUl

izHkkx] 33] eqDrkuan uxj] xksikyiqjk okbZikl] t;iqj&302018

(jktLFkku) ds fy, fyf[kr :i esa vk{ksi Hkst ldsxk A

vuqlwph

rglhy % ekjokM+ taD'ku

ftyk % ikyh

jkT; % jktLFkku

Øe la- xzke dk uke [kljk la[;k

{ks=kiQy

gsDVs;j

,;j

oxZ

ehVj

nsoyh

1651

1652

1670(ljdkjh Hkwfe)

1653(ljdkjh Hkwfe)

1654/1

1654/2

1654

1655(ljdkjh Hkwfe)

1594

1595

1- nsoyh

1596

1597

1592

1199

1200

1183

1183/1679

1176

1177

1178

1179

1153/1

1153/2

1153

1135

1141

1136

1137

1104

1105

1106

1100

1098

1099

1101

1069

1068

1067

1205(ljdkjh Hkwfe)

1273

1274

1275

1276(lk-fu-fo-)

1277

1283

1049(ljdkjh Hkwfe)

1044

1043

1039(ljdkjh Hkwfe)

1009

1010

1046

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1- nsoyh

1012

1013

1002

999

981 (ljdkjh Hkwfe)

904

914

903(ljdkjh Hkwfe)

901

878

877

876

871

870(ljdkjh Hkwfe)

867

865

864

861

857

946

947

2. tsriqjk

244

226ljdkjh Hkwfe)

201

203

204

205

218

213

214

270

279

272(xzke iapk;r

Hkwfe)

278

273

3. dknw

202(ljdkjh Hkwfe)

201 (ljdkjh Hkwfe)

200(ljdkjh Hkwfe)

199(ljdkjh Hkwfe)

206(ljdkjh Hkwfe)

3. dknw

207(lk-fu-fo-)

208(ljdkjh Hkwfe)

211 (ljdkjh Hkwfe)

175

221

222

172

160

162

169

166

167

165

150

151

148

129

116 (ljdkjh Hkwfe)

114

113

109

112

111/1

39(ljdkjh Hkwfe)

4. xqMk dslj¯lg

678

679

680

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

1047

4. xqMk dslj¯lg

681/1

681/2

5. tfV;ksa dh <k.kh

2386

2357

235 4(ljdkjh Hkwfe)

2348

2347

2346

2345

2339 (ljdkjh Hkwfe)

2336 (ljdkjh Hkwfe)

2335 (ljdkjh Hkwfe)

1374/1 (ljdkjh Hkwfe)

1268

1263

1264

1260

1261

1255

1220

1221

1215

6. vkaxnks"k

216 (ljdkjh Hkwfe)

218 (ljdkjh Hkwfe)

220 (ljdkjh Hkwfe)

242 (ljdkjh Hkwfe)

247

246

248

249

250 (ljdkjh Hkwfe)

251

254 (ljdkjh Hkwfe)

370

367 (ljdkjh Hkwfe)

366

365 (ljdkjh Hkwfe)

351 (ljdkjh Hkwfe)

344

309

334

6. vkaxnks"k

327

228

7. jMkokl

1 (ljdkjh Hkwfe)

8. xknuk

263 (ljdkjh Hkwfe)

274 (ljdkjh Hkwfe)

273

275

276

280 (ljdkjh Hkwfe)

312

309

308

307

295 (ljdkjh Hkwfe)

282

286

287

288

225 (ljdkjh Hkwfe)

233

232

20 (ljdkjh Hkwfe)

189

190

194

198

199

205

202

217

216

166 (lk-fu-fo-)

151

150

144 (ljdkjh Hkwfe)

42 (ljdkjh Hkwfe)

1048

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

9. jk.kkokl

354

353

347

346

345

343

344

337

340

339

385

386

390

308 (jsYos)

101

102

104

10.oM+h

277

275

274

269/1

264

263

262

10.oM+h

54 (xzke iapk;r

Hkwfe)

36 (ljdkjh Hkwfe)

32 (xzke iapk;r

Hkwfe)

33 (xzke iapk;r

Hkwfe)

11. xksikokl

85 (ljdkjh Hkwfe)

110

109

107

104

59 (ljdkjh Hkwfe)

12.fuEoyhek.Mk

150

149

148

147

137

135 (ljdkjh Hkwfe)

134

130

133

114(ljdkjh Hkwfe)

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

1049

12.fuEoyhek.Mk

39 (ljdkjh Hkwfe)

13. ek.Mk

1009

1012

1008

1007

1022 (ljdkjh Hkwfe)

1023

1003

1024

1026

1029

1053 (ljdkjh Hkwfe)

1119

1118

1117

1137

1138

1110

1109

1094

1095

1086

1085 (ljdkjh Hkwfe)

1084

1201

1204

1233

1231 (ljdkjh Hkwfe)

1286

1285

1284

1283

1313

1314

1315

1316 (ljdkjh Hkwfe)

812

13. ek.Mk

801

802

804

805

806

799

733

735

738 (ljdkjh Hkwfe)

763

762

761

14. gehjokl

229

228

227

226

225

224

223

222

220

219

218 ( ljdkjh Hkwfe)

15.jktksyk [kqnZ

307

308

309/1

304

303

296

297

271

273

274

241

230

252

346

335 (ljdkjh Hkwfe)

345

208

206

197

1050

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

15. jktksyk [kqnZ

197/1

198/1

198/2

195

194

190

16.dUVkfy;k

376

375

374

373

372 (ljdkjh Hkwfe)

109 (ljdkjh Hkwfe)

110

111/1

112

115

17. oksjuMh

234

235 (ljdkjh Hkwfe)

237 (ljdkjh Hkwfe)

238 (ljdkjh Hkwfe)

260 (ljdkjh Hkwfe)

259

236 (ljdkjh Hkwfe)

256

255

262

263

149 (ljdkjh Hkwfe)

133

148

18.xqMkfxjh

100

101

103

102

106

[iQk- la- vkj&25011@5@2011&vks vkj&1]

ch- ds- nÙkk] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 31st January, 2011

S.O. 381.—Whereas, it appears to the Central

Government, that it is necessary in the public interest that

for the transportation of petroleum crude a pipeline from

Salaya in the State of Gujarat to Mathura in the State of

Uttar Pradesh, (Under Salaya-Mathura Pipeline De-

bottlenecking Project) should be laid by the Indian Oil

Corporation Limited;

And, whereas, it appears to the Central Government

that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is

necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under

which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which

is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and

Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land)

Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby

declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the

said schedule may, within twenty one days from the date

on which the copies of this notification issued under sub-

section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the

Gazette of India, are made available to the general public,

object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user

therein or laying of the pipeline under the land, to Shri

Bhim Singh, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation

Limited ( Pipelines Division), 33, Muktanand Nagar,

Gopalpura Byepass, Jaipur -302018 (Rajasthan).

SCHEDULE

Tehsil : Marwar Junction

District : Pali State : Rajasthan

Sl. Name of

Khasra No.

Area

No. Village

Hectare Are Sq. mtr.

1. Deoli

1651

1652

1670(Govt. Land)

1653(Govt. Land)

1654/1

1654/2

1654

1655(Govt. Land)

1594

1595

1596

1597

1592

1199

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

1051

1. Deoli

1200

1183

1183/1679

1176

1177

1178

1179

1153/1

1153/2

1153

1135

1141

1136

1137

1104

1105

1106

1100

1098

1099

1101

1069

1068

1067

1205(Govt. Land)

1273

1274

1275

1276(P.W.D.)

1277

1283

1049(Govt. Land)

1044

1043

1039(Govt. Land)

1009

1010

1012

1013

1002

999

981 (Govt. Land)

1. Deoli

904

914

903(Govt. Land)

901

878

877

876

871

870(Govt. Land)

867

865

864

861

857

946

947

2. Jetpura

244

226(Govt. Land)

201

203

204

205

218

213

214

270

279

272( Gram

Panchayat Land)

278

273

3. Kadu

202(Govt. Land)

201 (Govt. Land)

200(Govt. Land)

199(Govt. Land)

206(Govt. Land)

207(P.W.D.)

208(Govt. Land)

211 (Govt. Land)

175

221

222

1052

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

3. Kadu

172

160

162

169

166

167

165

150

151

148

129

116 (Govt. Land)

114

113

109

112

111/1

39(Govt. Land)

4. Guda kesarsingh

678

679

680

681/1

681/2

5. Jatiyon Ki Dhani 2386

2357

2354(Govt. Land)

2348

2347

5. Jatiyon Ki Dhani 2346

2345

2339(Govt. Land)

2336(Govt. Land)

2335(Govt. Land)

1374/1(Govt. Land)

1268

1263

1264

1260

1261

1255

1220

1221

1215

6. Angdosh

216(Govt. Land)

218(Govt. Land)

220(Govt. Land)

242(Govt. Land)

247

246

248

249

250(Govt. Land)

251

254(Govt. Land)

370

367(Govt. Land)

366

365(Govt. Land)

351 (Govt. Land)

344

309

334

327

228

7. Radawas

1(Govt. Land)

8. Gadana

263(Govt. Land)

274(Govt. Land)

273

275

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

1053

8. Gadana

276

280(Govt. Land)

312

309

308

307

295(Govt. Land)

282

286

287

288

225(Govt. Land)

233

232

200(Govt. Land)

189

190

194

198

199

205

202

217

216

166(P.W.D.)

151

150

144(Govt. Land)

42(Govt. Land)

9. Ranawas

354

353

347

346

345

343

344

337

9. Ranawas

340

339

385

386

390

308(Railway)

101

102

104

10.Bari

277

275

274

269/1

264

263

262

54( Gram

Panchayat Land)

36(Govt. Land)

32( Gram

Panchayat Land)

1054

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

10.Bari

33( Gram

Panchayat Land)

11. Gopawas

85(Govt. Land)

110

109

107

104

59(Govt. Land)

12.Nimlimanda

150

149

148

147

137

135(Govt. Land)

134

130

133

114(Govt. Land)

39(Govt. Land)

13. Manda

1009

1012

1008

1007

1022(Govt. Land)

1023

1003

1024

1026

1029

1053(Govt. Land)

1119

1118

1117

1137

1138

1110

1109

1094

1095

1086

1085(Govt. Land)

1084

1201

1204

1233

1231 (Govt. Land)

1286

1285

1284

1283

1313

1314

1315

1316(Govt. Land)

812

801

802

804

805

806

799

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

1055

13. Manda

733

735

738(Govt. Land)

763

762

761

14.Hameerwas

229

228

227

226

225

224

223

222

220

219

218( Govt. Land)

15.Rajola Khurd

307

308

309/1

304

303

296

297

271

273

274

241

230

252

346

335(Govt. Land)

345

208

206

197

197/1

198/1

198/2

195

194

190

16.Kantaliya

376

375

374

373

372(Govt. Land)

109(Govt. Land)

110

111/1

112

115

17. Borandi

234

235(Govt. Land)

237(Govt. Land)

238(Govt. Land)

260(Govt. Land)

259

236(Govt. Land)

256

255

262

263

149(Govt. Land)

133

148

18.Gudangiri

100

101

103

102

106

[F. No. R-25011/5/2011-OR-1]

B. K. DATTA, Under Secy.

1056

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Je ,oa jkstxkj ea=kky;

ubZ fnYyh] 30 fnlEcj] 2010

dk- vk- 382-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh; ljdkj dksfPp fjiQkbujh

fyfeVsM] dksfpu ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa

ds chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn eas dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] ,j.kkdqye ds iapkV (lanHkZ

la[;k 21]22@2002) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

30&12&2010 dks izkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y&30011@62@2002&vkbZ vkj(,e)]

,y&30011@65@2002&vkbZ vkj(,e)º

jes'k flag] MsLd vf/dkjh

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

New Delhi, the 30th December, 2010

S. O. 382.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 21, 22/

2002) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum-

Labour Court, Ernakulm now as shown in the Annexure in

the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to

the management of Kochi Refineries Ltd. and their workmen,

which was received by the Central Government on

30-12-2010.

[ No. L-30011/62/2002-IR(M),

L-30011/65/2002-IR(M)]

RAMESH SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL

TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, ERNAKULAM

Present: Shri.P. L. Norbert, B.A., LL.B., Presiding Officer

(Tuesday the 16th day of November, 2010/

25th Karthikam, 1932)

I.D.98/2006

(I.D. 21/2002 of Labour Court, Ernakulam)

Union

The General Secretary,

Cochin Refineries Employees Association,

Ambalamughal,

Cochin - 682 302.

By Adv. Sri. C. S. Ajith Prakash.

Management:

The General Manager (HRM),

Kochi Refineries Ltd.,

Ambalamughal,

Cochin - 682 302.

By Advs. M/s. Menon & Pai.

I.D. 327/2006

(I.D. 22/2002 of Labour Court, Ernakulam)

Union

The General Secretary,

Cochin Refineries Workers Association,

VPP /427, Ambalamughal,

Cochin - 682 302.

By Adv. Sri. C. S. Ajith Prakash

Management:

The General Manager (HRM),

Kochi Refineries Ltd.,

Ambalamughal,

Cochin - 682 302.

By Advs. M/s. Menon & Pai

This case coming up for hearing on 3-11-2010, this

Tribunal-cum-Labour Court on 16-11-2010 passed the

following.

AWARD

These are references made under Section 10(1)(d)

of Industrial Disputes Act. The references are:

1. “Whether the quantum of punishment imposed

on Shri P. C. Gopalan was proportionate or not? If

not, what is the appropriate quantum of punishment

proportionate to the misconduct should have been

imposed. If not, what are other entitled benefit to

the workman?”.

2. ‘‘Whether the action of the management of Kochi

Refineries Ltd. in imposing the punishment of

reduction to lower grade on Shri V. K. G. Naidu is

justified? If not, to what relief the workman is

entitled?” .

2. The facts of the case in brief are as follows:—

The unions have questioned the disciplinary action

taken by Kochi Refinery Ltd. against Sri V. G. K. Naidu and

Sri P. C. Gopalan, employees of Kochi Refinery Ltd. and

Direct Board members of employees’ society. The

management company, Kochi Refinery Ltd. is running an

industrial canteen in the company premises through a

society by name CRECCS Ltd. since 1966. The society is

administered by a Board of Directors. There are seven

Director Board members as per the bye-laws of the society.

Out of them three are elected from among workers of the

management company and 4 are nominated by the

company. The tenure of the Director Board is 2 years.

Sri V. G. K. Naidu, P. C. Gopalan and M. Ravikumar were

elected to the Director Board for the period 1996-98. Besides

the canteen, the society is also running a co-operative

store. The cost of running the canteen is borne by the

company by providing subsidy. The supply of vegetables

and fruits to the canteen was done under a contract. As

per the decision of the Director Board one of the Directors

had to inspect and certify the quality and quantity of

vegetables and fruits supplied by the contractor to the

canteen. While so, there were widespread talk among

employees of the company that, there is malpractice in

certifying the quantity of vegetables and fruits supplied

to canteen by the contractor. The allegations were against

V. G. K. Naidu, P. C. Gopalan and M. Ravikumar (Directors).

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

1057

On 17-12-1997 the President of the society made a surprise

check of the vegetables and fruits supplied on that day

and found discrepancy in certifying the quantity of the

goods. Hence an emergency board meeting was called on

19-12-1997 and the matter was discussed. The 3 directors

were asked to explain about the allegations against them

and the discrepancy found in the quantity of the goods

certified by P. C. Gopalan. The contractor Sri K. G. Bose

was also summoned to explain about the difference in the

weight of goods supplied by him and the weight certified

by Sri P. C. Gopalan. Since the explanation of none of them

was satisfactory the board decided to stop the contract

with Sri K. G. Bose and take action against Sri P.C. Gopalan.

An enquiry was conducted against Sri P.C. Gopalan and

he was found guilty and punished by withholding one

increment with cumulative effect. Thereafter records with

regard to supply of goods prior to 17-12-1997 was checked

and further discrepancies were found. That is how the

present domestic enquiry originated and disciplinary

action against the directors was initiated. A joint domestic

enquiry was conducted. Sri Ravikumar was found not

guilty, but the other two were held guilty and SriV. G. K.

Naidu was demoted as Fire Truck Driver at the lowest

stage in Grade-V and Sri P. C. Gopalan as General

Craftsman (Fitter) at the lowest stage in Grade-VI. This is

questioned as per the references. Since the unions raised

a preliminary objection regarding the competency of

Kochi Refinery Ltd., instead of society, to take

disciplinary action that aspect was considered as a

preliminary issue and found that the company has the

authority and jurisdiction to take disciplinary action

against the Director Board Members of the society. Since

the facts and evidence are common these references are

jointly tried and evidence is adduced in I.D. 98/2006. The

contentions in both cases are common and are as

follows:—

3. According to the unions in both cases the CBI

had registered a crime in respect of the same incident. The

documents produced in enquiry by the management are

the same as collected by the investigating officer of CBI in

the crime. However at the end of investigation the CBI

had referred the case. On the same set of facts and

materials the company has initiated departmental action.

Since CBI has found that there are no sufficient materials

to prosecute accused 1 to 3 it was not proper and legal for

the management to have proceeded with the departmental

action. Allegation that higher quantity of vegetables and

fruits were certified by the directors is not true. In fact

lesser quantity was certified by the directors. Material

witnesses were not examined by the management. Many

documents were proved through incompetent witnesses.

The CBI Inspector took undue interest in prosecuting the

workmen in the enquiry. There is no evidence regarding

acceptance of bribe by the workmen. A prior disciplinary

action against SriP. C. Gopalan was settled between the

parties as the discrepancy in certifying the weight had

happened due to mere negligence.

4. According to the management the workmen had

certified receipt of higher quantities of vegetables and

fruits than actual, caused loss to the company and accepted

illegal gratification from the contractor. The matter was

investigated by the Senior Manager, Vigilance of the

company and found that there were irregularities in

certifying the quantities of vegetables and fruits. Hence a

complaint was lodged with CBI by the Chief Vigilance

Officer. CBI recommended departmental action. Hence

show-cause notices were issued to the workmen. Since

their replies were not satisfactory a domestic enquiry was

ordered and charge sheets were issued to the delinquents.

Full and fair opportunity was given to the delinquents in

the enquiry. The Enquiry Officer had complied with the

principles of natural justice. He found Sri V. G. K. Naidu

and SriP.C.Gopalan guilty of the charges and

Sri M.Ravikumar was exonerated. The disciplinary

authority of the company had called for representations

of the workmen with regard to the findings of Enquiry

Officer as well as proposed punishment suggested by the

disciplinary authority. The representations on both counts

were considered by the disciplinary authority and by

separate orders findings were confirmed and punishments

were imposed. Though the misconduct warranted dismissal

a lenient view was taken by the management and hence

the workmen were demoted in service. Both had filed Ops.

before Hon’ble High Court, but were dismissed. Though

appeals were filed they did not succeed. There is no legal

bar in initiating departmental action though police action

was dropped. Sri P. C. Gopalan was once punished for a

previous similar misconduct. The findings are based on

evidence.

5. In the light of the above contentions the following

points arise for consideration.

1. Are the findings sustainable?

2. Is the punishment proper?

6. The evidence consists of enquiry files alone which

are marked as Exts. M 1 to M 1 (c).

7. Point No. 1:—

Before I go into the merits of the case I propose to

consider certain preliminary objections raised by the

learned counsel for the unions.

(a) According to the learned counsel for the unions

the charge sheeted employees were elected to

the Director Board of the Society and not

1058

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

nominated by Kochi Refineries Ltd. Therefore

the management company has no jurisdiction

to take disciplinary action or impose

punishment. It has to be done by the society.

This issue was considered and answered as a

preliminary issue.

(b) It is then contended that charges are vague

and chargesheet is not accompanied by a

statement of allegations. The charge sheet

issued to Sri V.G.K. Naidu is contained at page

11 (running page) of Ext. M1 enquiry file and

that of P.C. Gopalan at page 19. The allegations

are that as Directors while verifying and

certifying quality and quantity of vegetables

and fruits supplied by the contractor to the

canteen they had inflated the weight and

acknowledged receipt of more quantity than

actual, that as a result loss was caused to the

company, that they had accepted bribe to the

tune of Rs. l,34,000 and that provisions of

certified standing orders of the company were

violated by them. The chargesheets were

preceded by a show cause notice. The notices

are contained at page 3 (V.G.K. Naidu) and

page 1 (P.C. Gopalan) of Ext. M1. The allegations

in the show cause notices are that the charge

sheeted employees had certified receipt of

higher quantities of vegetables and fruits than

what were actually supplied by the contractor,

and that they had received bribe. The reply of

Sri P.C. Gopalan to the notice is contained at

page 7 of Ext.M 1. His reply is that allegations

are vague. Company has no authority for taking

action. The contract for supply of vegetables

and fruits was arranged by the Director Board

and not by him. He denies that he had certified

receipt of higher quantities than actual. He

denies receipt of illegal gratification. Sri Naidu

in his reply (page 13) states that the contract

was arranged by the Director Board and not by

him. He had never certified receipt of higher

quantities of goods. He denies acceptance of

bribe. To the chargesheet no replies were

submitted as the charge sheeted employees

were not called upon to submit any reply as it

was a chargesheet cum notice of enquiry. The

Standing Orders of the company (Ext.M-27)

which pertains to the procedure in enquiry is

contained in SO 30.3. The relevant portion

reads:—

“A workman against whom an enquiry is to be

held shall be given written notice of his alleged

misconduct and will be given an opportunity to

explain the circumstances alleged against him”.

Standing Orders 30.3 does not contemplate a

chargesheet. What is required is only a notice. Therefore

the allegations in the notices are to be taken as the charges

against the delinquents. It is true that in the chargesheet it

is alleged that the delinquents had inflated the weight of

vegetables and fruits in the bills of the contractor and

certified receipt of more than the quantity actually supplied

by the contractor. Based on this allegation in the charge

sheet it is contended by the learned counsel for the unions

that the chargesheet is vague in as much as it is not

understood as to how the delinquents had inflated the

weight of vegetables and fruits in the bills. In fact the

delinquents had certified lesser quantities of goods than

what are shown in the bills by the contractor. It seems that

the learned counsel has culled out a part of the sentence

from the chargesheet and has projected it as a vague

allegation. But the 2nd part of the charge makes it clear

that the delinquents had certified receipt of more than the

quantity supplied. This is more clear from the show cause

notices where it is alleged that the delinquents had certified

receipt of higher quantities than actual. Therefore there is

no ambiguity in the charge that what was certified in the

bills by the delinquents was receipt of higher quantities of

vegetables and fruits than actual. While show cause

notices were replied no explanation was submitted to the

allegations in the chargesheet. In the light of the allegations

in the show cause notice there is no merit in the submission

of the learned counsel for the union that charges are vague.

Therefore the decision cited by the learned counsel for

the unions and reported in Viswamithran v. S.N. College

1997 1 KLJ 147 has no relevance, as it pertains to vagueness

of charges.

union that the delinquents had sought the assistance of a

lawyer to defend them. But the disciplinary authority in an

arbitrary manner rejected the request. The standing orders

of the company permit lawyer’s assisance for the defence.

The allegations are serious and records are very many.

Therefore it was all the more necessary to get the help of

a lawyer. To deny it is to deny fair play in the enquiry. To

support the contention the learned counsel relies on India

Photographic Co. Ltd. v. Saumitra Mohan Kumar 1984 LAB.

I.C.42. In that case the charge sheeted employee made a

request for the assistance of a lawyer in the enquiry. But it

was rejected. It was held by the Calcutta High Court that

the employee was facing a serious charge of forgery and

fraud affecting the reputation and future means of

livelihood. Hence denial of legal assistance may amount

to denial of natural justice. In the reported case the plaintiff

who was an employee of the defendant company had given

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

1059

delivery of 40 rolls of film to a customer. But he altered the

figure ‘40’ into ‘4’ by erasing ‘0’ in the copy of the order.

As a result the company received payment only of 4 rolls.

The employee was chargesheeted for manipulation of

records, dishonest and fraudulent delivery of goods and

misappropriation of sale proceeds. An enquiry was

ordered. The employee sought assistance of a lawyer which

was turned down by the company. The employee then

instituted a suit before City Civil Court, Calcutta to restrain

the company from proceeding with the domestic enquiry

without appointment of a lawyer for the employee. The

learned Chief Judge granted a temporary injunction

restraining the company from proceeding with the domestic

enquiry without allowing the request of the employee to

take the assistance of a lawyer. But it is relevant to note

the observation of the Calcutta High Court in para 14 of

the judgment that it would have taken a different view

than what was arrived at by the learned Chief Judge of the

City Civil Court (though it is a possible view) but for the

fact that being a Court of appeal it has its basic limitation

of a court of appeal. It is relevant to extract para 14.

“14. As we have pointed out herein before that

though court should ordinarily discourage legal

representation in domestic enquiry, it is open to a

reviewing court to consider whether the facts

constitute an exceptional case which demands that

legal representation should be allowed as otherwise

there may be a failure of the enquiry. In the present

case we find the learned Chief Judge in exercising

his judicial discretion was conscious of the actual

legal requirements and applied the correct legal

principles referred to herein before. On the facts of

the case, he thought that an exceptional case has

been made out and concluded that refusal of legal

representation would materially prejudice the

respondent at the enquiry which is likely to result in

failure thereof. We ourselves might on the same set

of facts have come to a different conclusion than

what was arrived at by the learned Chief Judge but

as a court of appeal we cannot set aside the decision

of the learned Chief Judge if the view taken by him is

a possible view and that had been arrived at on the

application of the correct principles of law. Since we

are unable to go so far as to hold that such a view

could not have been taken at all as we taken by the

learned Chief Judge, we are unable to interfere with

his decision. That perhaps is the basic limitation of

a court of appeal in a case like the present one as

pointed out by the Privy Council in the case of

Rehmatunnissa Begum v. Price, AIR 1917 PC 116’’.

Reliance was also placed on the decision of the Court

of Appeal, Civil Division in PETT v. Greyhound Racing

Association Ltd., (1968) 2 All E.R. 545. The appellant sought

the help of a counsel and solicitor. But it was not allowed.

The National Club Rules which was applicable to

Greyhound Racing Association which is the disciplinary

authority was silent as to the procedure in the enquiry. It

was held by the Court of Appeal that the appellant was

entitled to be represented by a lawyer as the enquiry being

one of serious importance to him.

So far as the present case is concerned the right for

representation is contained in SO 30.3. The relevant portion

reads:

“............................................ permitted to be defended only

by himself or by fellow workman of the company

............................................. .

Where the company has appointed a person for

holding an enquiry into the charge, it may by an order,

appoint an officer of the company or a legal or

‘‘ .............................. In such a case, the concerned

employee may take the assistance of another employee of

the company ........................................... and be permitted

to engage a legal or professional practitioner,

.......................or the company having regard to the

circumstances of the case, so permits”.

It is argued by the learned counsel for the unions

that the company has the discretion to permit

representation by a lawyer considering the nature of the

case. But the company did not consider the

circumstances and the serious nature of the case while

taking a decision. In page 80 of Ext.M 1 (a) proceedings

the request of the workmen is recorded by the Enquiry

Officer. But the order of the disciplinary authority is not

incorporated in the enquiry files. However the union

furnished a copy of the order at the time of hearing. It

shows that after quoting the provision in the Standing

Orders (30.3) the Disciplinary Authority ordered as

follows:—

“In view of this specific revision, we regret to inform

you that we are not in a position to favourably

consider your request for engaging a legal

practitioner for your defence”.

It is an admitted fact that the presenting officer of

the company was not a legal practitioner. Therefore as of

right the workmen could not have sought the assistance

of a lawyer to defend them. Regarding the nature of the

case no legal complications are involved. It is a simple

case of recording and certifying receipt of more quantity

of goods than actual. No doubt account books and bills

are there. Since such malpractice is alleged to have been

carried on for quite sometime naturally records are

voluminous. But that does not make the case complex. As

per S.O. 30.3 the Disciplinary Authority is not bound to

give reasons for rejecting the request of a charge sheeted

1060

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

employee for lawyer’s assistance. Hence on account of

that there is no denial of natural justice. That apart since

validity of enquiry is not challenged and enquiry is not

vitiated for violation of principles of natural justice, denial

of legal assistance cannot affect the findings.

(d) It is contended by the union that material

witnesses were not examined by the management in the

domestic enquiry. It is pointed out that the Senior Manager,

Vigilance, Sri M.T. Simon George who had investigated

the case and recorded statements of witnesses, Sri K.I.

Varghese, the partner of contractor in the vegetable

business and the Assistant Canteen Manager Sri Jaison

K. Joseph who has counter signed the bills of contractor,

were not examined. It is to be noted that it is for the

management to decide their witnesses and not for the

defence to dictate. What is important is whether the

witnesses examined on the management side have

supported the case of the management and whether that

evidence is sufficient to prove the guilt of delinquents.

The defence is free to summon anyone and examine on

their side. Therefore non examination of certain witnesses

by the management is not a reason to say that the findings

are perverse.

(e) It is then contended that the management had

produced only Photostat copies of documents and they

were marked in enquiry flouting even the elementary Rules

of evidence. The decision in Makhan Singh v. Narainpura

Co-op. Agrl. Service Society Ltd. AIR 1987 SC 1892 is cited

to support the contention. In that case the employee was

terminated from service on grounds of embezzlement and

unauthorized absence. No domestic enquiry was

conducted. The termination was challenged before Labour

Court. The management produced 3 photostat copies of

entries in the pass books and they were marked. The

originals were not produced. The employee had

questioned the genuineness of documents produced.

However the labour court accepted the documents

(photostat copies) and did not consider the question

whether the copies could be accepted without the originals.

The findings of the labour court was found unsustainable.

The award of the labour court as well as the judgment of

the High Court were set aside and the employee was

ordered to be reinstated.

So far as the present case is concerned, the workmen

had not objected to the marking of Photostat copies. The

bills of contractor are Exts.M7, M7(a), M8, M9, M10, M11,

M12 and 12(a). They are photostat copies. Their

genuineness were not questioned at the time of marking.

Besides the quantity of goods was verified and quantity

was certified in the bills by the workmen. The defence too

had produced photostat copies of some bills which were

received in evidence and marked in the enquiry as Exts.D1,

D4, D5 and D-27. The same rule is applicable to the defence

as well. Having not objected to the marking of photo copies

of not only bills but other documents as well, it is not

open now for the union to challenge. The original account

books maintained in the shop of vegetable merchant K.I.

Varghese were produced and marked as Exts. 13, 14 and

15. Photostat copies of relevant pages of M-13, 14 and 15

are marked as Ext.M-16. So also original bills Ext.M-17

were produced and their Photostat copies are Ext.M-18.

The account book maintained in the wholesale fruit shop

was produced and marked as Ext. M-19 and its photostat

copy as Ext. M-20. Exts.M21 to 26 are statements (original)

prepared by Sr. Accounts Officer of the management

showing the details of goods supplied like items, price,

quantity supplied, excess quantity certified etc. Most of

the remaining documents are photostat copies of

statements of witnesses recorded by Sr. Manager,

Vigilance, letters, show cause notices, charge-sheets,

minutes of board meetings, enquiry report etc. The

statements were marked through witnesses. No objection

was raised then. Now it is not open to the union to question

the admissibility of Photostat copies of documents. Besides

the strict Rule of Evidence is not applicable to domestic

tribunals.

(f) The next submission of the learned counsel for

the union is that all marked documents are not before the

court and therefore the court cannot appreciate and

analyse the evidence properly and assess the correctness

of the findings. Exts.M-13, 14, 15, 18 and 19 are not

available in the enquiry files. Some more documents were

missing initially and it is when the learned counsel for the

union drew the attention of the court as well the opposite

counsel that they were produced by a separate file and is

marked as Ext.M-1©. Still 5 documents are missing. Exts.

M -13, 14 and 15 are original books of accounts kept in the

wholesale vegetable shop of K.I. Varghese at Tripunithura.

Photostat copies of relevant pages of Ext.M-13, 14 and 15

are Ext.M-16 and it is available in the file. Even if the original

account books were available the relevant documents for

the purpose of deciding the issue are Ext. M-16. Hence

even in the absence of original books the photostat copies

of relevant folios (Ext.M-16) are sufficient for the purpose

of the case. Ext.M-16 was marked in enquiry when original

books were available before the Enquiry Officer. Ext.M-18

are photocopies of bills. But Ext.M-18 is missing while

their original Ext.M-17 is available. Therefore absence of

Ext. M-18 cannot prejudice the workmen. Ext.M-19 is the

account book of wholesale fruit shop at Perumbavoor. It

is missing. But its photostat copy Ext.M-20 is available.

Photostat copy was marked when original was before the

Enquiry Officer. Therefore that also cannot affect the

defence.

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

1061

(g) It was argued by the learned counsel for the

union that the CBI had registered a crime and investigated

the matter in respect of the same incident. But they could

not collect sufficient materials to charge-sheet the

workmen and hence they referred the case. It is not legal

or proper for the management company to have proceeded

with the domestic enquiry in the wake of the report of the

Inspector of Police, CBl. Page 399 of Ext.M-1 file contains

the final report of CBI submitted to CBI Court. It is

mentioned in the report that in order to ascertain actual

supply of goods the only evidence that was available was

the account books of Sri Syed Muhammed and V.A. Aliyar

who supplied vegetables and fruits to K.G. Bose, the

contractor. But their account books are not properly

maintained and some are even in the form of loose sheets.

The possibility of contractor procuring vegetables and

fruits from other sources cannot be ruled out. The

contractor used to purchase fruits and vegetables in bulk

and after supplying a portion to the shop of K.I. Varghese

the remaining goods used to be supplied to Cochin

Refineries Ltd. canteen. Hence the account books of

Sri Syed Muhammed and Aliyar cannot be taken at their

face value. The records maintained in the shop of Sri

Varghese are not maintained regularly in the normal course

of business. There is no evidence to establish that the

contractor had paid Rs. l,34,000 to the accused. Having

not come across any tangible evidence against the

workmen the CBI has referred the case. On the same

charges departmental action is taken. It is unfair and

illegal. To support his submission the learned counsel

has referred to the decision of High Court of Allahabad

reported in Bhagwat Charan v. State of V.U. 1973-II-LLJ

462 wherein it is held that an honourable acquittal by a

criminal court makes a departmental action on the basis

of the same charges incompetent. The reported decision

is with regard to a case when the criminal court had

enquired into the matter, assessed the evidence and came

to a conclusion that there was no evidence to convict

the accused. But in this case there was no occasion for

the CBI Court to consider the charges at all on merits.

Thus no judicial forum had any chance to analyse and

assess the evidence in respect of the accused persons.

Therefore the decision cited by the learned counsel has

no application. Even in a case of acquittal by a criminal

court departmental action is not barred except in the case

of same set of evidence in both cases on all fours.

Therefore that contention of the union is also not

sustainable.

(h) It was lastly contended by the learned counsel

for the union that the Enquiry Officer has not given reasons

in support of his findings. Ext.M 1 (a) file contains the

enquiry report. The Enquiry Officer has discussed the oral

and documentary evidence first. Thereafter he has entered

his findings which are contained at pages 38-42. The

Enquiry Officer while recording the findings has discussed

in a concise manner the evidence in support of the charges

as well as the submissions of the defence. No doubt

elaborate discussion of the evidence in support of each

point is not made systematically as in the case of a judgment

of a court. But it is not correct to say that evidence is not

discussed by the Enquiry Officer. It is on the basis of the

materials in enquiry that the findings are entered and not

on the basis of the weight of reasoning. There is possibility

of reaching the same conclusions on the basis of two

different views and reasoning. Just because reasons

recorded are not sufficient it cannot be said that the

findings are perverse. Therefore on that count also the

submission of the union cannot be sustained.

9. Coming to the merits of the case it is relevant to

note that the validity of enquiry is not challenged. Notice

of enquiry was given, copies of documents relied on by

the management were given, list of witnesses of the

management was furnished, charges were read over to the

delinquents, the management witnesses were cross

examined, the defence adduced oral and documentary

evidence, the disciplinary authority heard the delinquents

regarding the findings and opportunity was given to

represent with respect to proposed punishment. Thus

there are no procedural lapses in conducting the enquiry.

If thus the procedure of enquiry is followed and principles

of natural justice are complied with what is open to

challenge is the findings of Enquiry Officer. Unless the

findings are perverse enquiry cannot be said to be vitiated.

To say that the findings are perverse there should be no

material at all to support the charges. If there is some

evidence and some material on record the findings cannot

be termed as perverse. Therefore the question is, are there

materials or no materials to bring home the guilt of the

charge-sheeted employees.

10. The learned counsel for the union submitted that

there is no legal evidence worth reliable to support the

case of the management. Hence the findings are perverse.

To explain what is perversity the learned counsel cited the

case of Central Bank of India Ltd. v. Prakash Chand Jain

1969-II-LLJ 377. In that case the Central Bank had sought

approval of the disciplinary action under Section 33(2)(b)

of Industrial Disputes Act before the Industrial Tribunal.

The Industrial Tribunal held that the enquiry was fair and

proper but refused to grant approval of the proposed

punishment. This was challenged in appeal. Hon’ble

Supreme Court held that the Industrial Tribunal had the

jurisdiction to disregard the findings of Enquiry Officer

even if the procedure in enquiry is proper, while considering

an approval application under Section 33(2)(b) of Industrial

Disputes Act provided the findings are perverse.

1062

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Regarding perversity of the findings it was observed that

the test of perversity is that the findings may not be

supported by legal evidence. Yet another case of perversity

is that when the findings are such which no reasonable

person could have arrived at on the basis of the materials

before him. It was also observed by the Court that even

though the technical Rules of Evidence need not be

observed by an Enquiry Officer in a domestic enquiry, yet

the substantive rules of evidence which would form part

of the principles of natural justice cannot be ignored by a

domestic tribunal. A statement made in the absence of a

person against whom enquiry is held cannot be treated as

a substantive evidence and it is one of the basic principles

of natural justice. Previous statements made not in the

presence of the person accused of can be accepted only

after giving copies of such statements well in advance to

the charge sheeted employee. A domestic tribunal is not

justified in recording its findings on the basis of hearsay

evidence without having any direct substantive evidence

in support of such findings. Thus the decision deals with

a case where there is no legal evidence to support the

charges.

11. In the light of this legal position my endeavour

is to see whether the findings in the enquiry are based on

some materials or they are the presumptions and

assumptions of Enquiry Officer based on conjectures and

surmises.

12. The evidence adduced before the Enquiry Officer

consists of oral testimony of MWs.1 to 6 and documentary

evidence of Exts.M1 to M43 on the side of the management

and DWs.1 to 3 (charge sheeted employees) and Exts.D 1

to D-35 on the side of charge sheeted employees. Ext.M4

(page 23 to 44 of Ext.M 1 Enquiry file) is the minutes of

board meeting of different dates which show that contract

for supply of vegetables and fruits was awarded to

Sri K. G. Bose (MW2) for a period of six months initially

and thereafter it was extended for another six months. It is

the case of the management that when vegetables and

fruits are brought for supply to the canteen, one of the

directors has to take verify the quantity and quality of the

goods and certify the quantity in the bills of the contractor

which has to be counter signed by canteen manager.

However the learned counsel for the union submits that

there was no entrustment of such a duty to the directors.

But the submission does not appear to be correct. Sri P.C.

Gopalan in his reply to show cause notice (page 8 of Ext.M

1) admits that his roll was only to verify and certify the

quantity and quality of the vegetables as and when

supplied as a member of the purchase committee and he

denies that the contract with Sri K. G.. Bose was arranged

by him. So also SriV.G.K. Naidu in his reply to the show

cause notice (page 13 of Ext.M 1 file) admits that the goods

supplied by the contractor used to be taken delivery of by

the catering officer after inspecting, weighing and

satisfying with regard to the quantity and quality in the

presence of any of the available directors in charge of the

canteen and if none of the directors in charge of the

canteen is available, by any other director. Both Director

and the catering officer will counter sign the despatch

note. During the tenure of Sri V. G. K. Naidu he had counter

signed the despatch notes, verified the quantity and quality

only on a very few occasions and that too only after being

satisfied about the quantity and quality of the goods.

MW1 the President of the society has stated [page 92 and

93 of Ext.M 1 (a) file] that as per the decision of the director

board the members of the board has to verify the quality

and quantity of vegetables and fruits supplied to the

canteen. Ext.M-28 is the statement (page 274—286 of

Ext.M1) of Sri P.C. Gopalan (the workman) recorded by the

Senior Manager (Vigilance) of the company wherein it is

admitted that he had the duty as a director board member

to verify the goods supplied to the canteen. In the light of

the above evidence the contention, that there is no

entrustment of duty to verify the quantity and quality of

the goods supplied to canteen, is without merits. Even

otherwise the bills of contractor show that both charge

sheeted employees [Sri P.C. Gopalan and Sri V.G..K. Naidu]

have certified the quantity of goods on different dates.

13. The malpractice and fraud alleged against the

charge sheeted employees are that while certifying the

quantity of vegetables and fruits supplied by the contractor

they certified receipt of higher quantity than actual and the

contractor paid bribe as a quid pro quo. Exts.M7, M7(a),

M8, M9 to M-12(a) and M-17 are the bills of relevant dates

on which the fraud is alleged to have been committed by

Sri P.C. Gopalan and Sri V.G.K. Naidu. Exts. M -13 to M -15

are the account books (original) kept in the shop of

wholesale vegetable merchant of Thripunithura, Sri K.I.

Varghese. Ext.M-16 are the relevant pages of Ext.M-13 to

15. Ext.M-18 are the handwritten bills (chits) of vegetables

purchased from the shop of Aliyar during December 1997

but issued in the name of Sri K.I. Varghese. Ext.M-19 is the

account book of fruits purchased from the wholesale dealer

and Ext.M-20 is photostat copy of Ext.M-19. On verification

of the bills of the contractor with the account books M-16

& 20 the difference in weight was detected and disciplinary

action was initiated. As per the charge sheet Sri P.C. Gopalan

had certified higher quantity of goods on 54 days during

17-06-1997 to 16-12-1997, while Sri V.G..K. Naidu on 10 days

during16-08-1997 to 26-11-1997. For easy reference a table

is prepared showing dates of occurrence, items supplied,

concerned bills of the contractor relevant entries in the

account books of wholesale merchant, actual quantity

supplied, quantity certified by the charge sheeted employees

and excess quantity.

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

1063

In respect of Shri, P-C-Gopalan

Relevant

entries in

Actual

Bills of

Account

quantity

Quantity

Excess

contractor

books of

supplied

certified

quantity

Occurrence

Items

(page in

K-I-

by P-C-

certified

dates

Ext- M 1

Varghese

canteen

Gopalan

(Kg.)

file)

(page in

(Kg.)

Ext-M1)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

17-06-1997

Ash gourd

110

233

Spinach

’’

Drum stick

“

Plantain

233

259

270

18-06-1997

Bread fruit

111

’’

125

127

Yam

’’

Snake gourd

’’

Plantain

233

134

139

19-06-1997

Onion

112

232

Cabbage

’’

Bitter gourd

’’

Banana

232

140.5

146.5

20-06-1997

Ivy gourd

113

232

Tomato

’’

Bitter gourd

’’

28-06-1997

Green chilly

114,115

231

8.5

1.5

Beans

’’

Raw banana

’’

Carrot

’’

Ash gourd

’’

Yam

’’

Tomato

’’

Radish

’’

Mango

’’

Brindle berry

’’

Robusta

230

341

342

Banana

’’

171

176

02-07-1997

Raw banana

116

229

Yam

’’

Cucumber

’’

Plantain

229

124.5

126

1.5

Banana

’’

165

172

04-07-1997

Onion

117

228

Ivy gourd

’’

Bitter gourd

’’

05-07-1997

Ginger

118

228

3.5

0.5

Small onion

’’

Cabbage

’’

114

116

Yam

’’

Pumpkin

’’

Drum stick

’’

1064

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

05-07-1997

Banana

228

143

148

Robusta

’’

196

203

26-07-1997

Raw banana

119

227

30.5

9.5

Onion

’’

Potato

’’

Carrot

’’

Cluster bean

’’

122

125

Yam

’’

Beans

’’

Brindle berry

’’

Banana

227

139

169

Plantain

’’

198

215

Robusta

’’

272

287

01-08-1997

Raw banana

120

226

Ivy gourd

’’

Ash gourd

’’

Beans

’’

Green chilly

’’

Pumpkin

’’

02-08-1997

Raw banana

121

226

17.5

5.5

Onion

’’

159

165

Small onion

’’

Cabbage

’’

133

140

Carrot

’’

Drum stick

’’

08-08-1997

Ginger

122

225

Yam

’’

Snake gourd

’’

Green chilly

’’

Pumpkin

’’

Ladies finger

’’

Curry leaf

’’

09-08-1997

Long beans

123, 124

224

Raw banana

’’

Cabbage

’’

Onion

’’

Ivy gourd

’’

Yam

’’

100

Snake gourd

’’

Green chilly

’’

Mango

’’

Carrot

’’

Pumpkin

’’

Drum stick

’’

Ladies finger

’’

Cucumber

’’

Curry leaf

’’

2.5

0.5

12-08-1997

Ivy gourd

125

223

Green chilly

’’

Coriander leaf

’’

0.5

Bitter gourd

’’

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

1065

12-08-1997

Drum stick

’’

Plantain

223

165

183

Banana

’’

158

176

13-08-1997

Ginger

126

222

Ivy gourd

’’

Yam

’’

Beetroot

’’

100

Snake gourd

’’

Green chill

’’

9.5

1.5

Onion

’’

102

Plantain

222

137

165

Banana

’’

133.5

145

11.5

Pineapple

’’

340

370

15-08-1997

Long beans

127

221

Ginger

’’

Raw banana

’’

84.5

5.5

Onion

’’

115

121

Small onion

’’

Tomato

’’

Green chill

’’

8.5

1.5

Cucumber

’’

22-08-1997

Long beans

128

220

Onion

’’

100

01-10-1997

Ginger

129

219

Raw banana

’’

55.5

14.5

Onion

’’

Small onion

’’

Ash gourd

’’

Yam

’’

Tomato

’’

Snake gourd

’’

Bitter gourd

’’

Ladies finger

’’

Drum stick

’’

Banana

219

193

221.5

28.5

Robusta

’’

169

201

02-10-1997

Long beans

130

218

Onion

’’

Cabbage

’’

Carrot

’’

Cauliflower

“

’’

Mango

’’

Plantain

218

116

145

Banana

’’

157

190

Robusta

’’

114

145

03-10-1997

Ginger

131

217

Raw banana

’’

23.5

11.5

Onion

’’

Potato

’’

Cabbage

’’

Yam

’’

Tomato

’’

Green chilly

’’

Bitter gourd

’’

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

1066

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

03-10-1997

Drum stick

’’

Plantain

217

Plantain

’’

122

152

Banana

’’

106

145

04-10-1997

Long beans

132

216

110

Raw banana

’’

Onion

’’

105

Ash gourd

’’

Chinese potato

’’

115

Green chilly

’’

Bitter gourd

’’

Pumpkin

’’

Drum stick

’’

Cucumber

’’

Snake gourd

’’

7.5

22.5

Plantain

216

48.5

26.50

Banana

’’

140

166

Plantain

’’

260

291

06-10-1997

Onion

133

215

111

112

Potato

’’

Ladies finger

’’

26.5

0.5

Cabbage

’’

Yam

’’

Green chilly

’’

Tomato

’’

Robusta

215

210

241

Banana

’’

113

141

Plantain

’’

139

178

Pineapple

’’

368

398

07-10-1997

Ginger

134

214

Tomato

’’

Gooseberry

’’

114

125

Chilly

’’

Ladies finger

’’

Curry leaf

’’

1.5

0.5

Tamarind

’’

Banana

214

123

150

Plantain

’’

127

160

21- 10-1997

Ginger

142

202

Raw banana

’’

Onion

’’

106

123

Yam

’’

Spinach

’’

Tomato

’’

Chilly

’’

Potato

’’

120

130

Banana

202

118

167

Plantain

’’

112

155

22-10-1997

Raw banana

143

201

Onion

’’

Carrot

’’

Cauliflower

’’

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

1067

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

22-10-1997

Beans

’’

Cabbage

’’

117

135

Chilly

’’

Bitter gourd

’’

Banana

201

192

218

Robusta

’’

428

464

Plantain

’’

103 (78+25)

159

23-10-1997

Cabbage

144

200

Yam

’’

Tomato

’’

Pumpkin

’’

Goose berry

’’

Snake gourd

’’

Chilly

’’

Cucumber

’’

Banana

200

150

156

Plantain

’’

145

146

Banana

’’

100

105

Pineapple

’’

160

176

25-10-1997

Raw banana

145

198

110

155

Small onion

’’

Cabbage

’’

110

Ash gourd

’’

21.5

5.5

Yam

’’

Chilly

’’

Drum Stick

“

Cucumber

“

Tamarind

“

Banana

198

134

181

Plantain

“

27-10-1997

Onion

146

197

104

Cabbage

’’

Yam

’’

Drum Stick

’’

Ladies finger

’’

Plantain

’’

135

160

Banana

’’

125

153

Pineapple

’’

350

400

01-11-1997

Long beans

147, 148

196

100

105

Raw Banana

’’

Onion

’’

105

Carrot

’’

Ivy gourd

’’

Yam

’’

100

Snake gourd

’’

Chilly

’’

Drum stick

’’

Curry leaf

’’

Pumpkin

’’

Banana

“

169

190

Plantain

’’

122

147

Robusta

’’

266

300

04-11-1997

Raw banana

149

194

Onion

’’

110

Cabbage

’’

1068

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

04-11-1997

Carrot

’’

Ash gourd

’’

Yam

’’

105

Tomato

’’

Wild lemon

’’

Snake gourd

’’

Chilly

’’

Drum stick

’’

Cucumber

’’

15.5

4.5

Potato

’’

56.5

6.5

Plantain

’’

262

321

Plantain

’’

Banana

’’

155

186

05-11-1997

Raw banana

150

194

Potato

’’

Cauliflower

’’

220

240

Tomato

’’

Chilly

’’

Drum stick

’’

Tamarind

’’

Banana

’’

172

226

Plantain

’’

133

06-11-1997

Onion

151

193

106

Ash gourd

’’

Yam

’’

Snake gourd

’’

140

150

Robusta

193

251

286

Plantain

’’

110

135

Banana

’’

203

228.5

25.5

Pineapple

’’

150

160

07-11- 1997

Ash guard

152

193

Tomato

’’

Bitter guard

’’

105

Pumpkin

’’

Cauliflower

’’

Banana

“

160

203.5

43.50

Plantain

’’

140.5

179

38.5

Plantain

“

’’

144

193

08-11-1997

Raw Banana

153, 154

192

Carrot

’’

Yam

’’

Beans

’’

Snake gaurd

’’

Chilly

’’

Bittergaurd

’’

Pumpkin

’’

Drum Stick

’’

Ladies Finger

’’

Cucumber

’’

Mango

’’

Banana

’’

146

172.5

26.5

Robusta

’’

417

418

13-11-1997

Cabbage

155

190

Ash Gourd

“

’’

Snake Gourd

“

’’

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

1069

13-11-1997

Tomato

“

’’

Green Chilly

“

’’

Pumpkin

“

’’

37.5

6.5

Ladies finger

“

’’

Cucumber

’’

15-11-1997

Long beans

156

189

Ginger

’’

Raw banana

’’

Carrot

’’

Ivy gourd

’’

Yam

’’

Beans

’’

Snake gourd

’’

Mango

’’

Drum Stick

’’

Ladies finger

’’

Cucumber

’’

Chilly

’’

Banana

’’

137

153

Plantain

’’

18-11-1997

Onion

157

187

Brinjal

’’

Ash Gourd

’’

27.5

6.5

Tomato

’’

Chilly

’’

Raw banana

’’

100

Ladies finger

’’

Cucumber

’’

Drum stick

’’

Plantain

’’

175

210

Plantain

’’

105

Banana

’’

154

191

19-11- 1997

Onion

158

187

Chill

’’

Bitter Gourd

’’

Banana

’’

180

229

Plantain

’’

139

175

20-11-1997

Onion

159

186

190

200

Potato

’’

Wild lemon

’’

Snake gourd

’’

Pumpkin

’’

21-11-1997

Onion

160

185

110

Ivy Gourd

’’

Ash Gourd

’’

Yam

’’

Snake Gourd

’’

Chilly

’’

Bitter Gourd

’’

Cucumber

’’

Banana

’’

133

162

22- 11-1997

Ginger

161,162

184,185

Raw banana

’’

Onion

’’

100

110

Carrot

’’

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

1070

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

22- 11-1997

Ash gourd

’’

Yam

’’

105

Snake Gourd

’’

Chilly

’’

Pumpkin

’’

Drum stick

’’

Brindle berry

’’

Ladies finger

’’

Plantain

184

125

Plantain

’’

272

286

Banana

’’

154

189

Robusta

’’

153.5

156

2.5

24-11-1997

Long beans

163

183

Chilly

’’

Brinjal

’’

Bitter gourd

’’

Banana

183

120.5

131.5

Plantain

’’

25-11-1997

Carrot

164

182,183

Chilly

’’

Plaintain

’’

27-11-1997

Onion

165

181

Ash gourd

’’

Yam

’’

Snake gourd

’’

Chilly

’’

Pumpkin

’’

Drum stick

’’

25.5

2.5

Ladies finger

’’

Banana

’’

151

161

Plantain

’’

136

145

28-11-1997

Onion

166

180

Small onion

’’

Chilly

’’

Drum stick

’’

Cabbage

’’

Banana

180

152

167

Plantain

’’

108.5

137

28.5

Plantain

’’

Banana

’’

Pineapple

’’

29-11-1997

Ginger

167

180

Onion

’’

154

170

Cabbage

’’

Carrot

’’

Ivy gourd

’’

Yam

’’

Green chilly

’’

. 3

Coriander leaf

’’

Bitter gourd

’’

Pumpkin

’’

Cucumber

’’

Brindle berry

’’

Robusta

180

289

311

Banana

’’

124

140

Plantain

’’

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

1071

01-12-1997

Tomato

168 & 169

179

Snake gourd

’’

Wild lemon

’’

Bitter gourd

’’

Yam

’’

100

105

Cabbage

’’

02-12-1997

Raw banana

170

179

Cabbage

’’

Tomato

’’

Chilly

’’

Pumpkin

’’

Curry leaf

’’

Brindle berry

’’

Plantain

179

146

154

Banana

’’

160

174

04-12-1997

Onion

175

235

104

112

Yam

’’

Gooseberry

’’

100

110

Chilly

’’

Pumpkin

’’

Ladies finger

’’

Cucumber

’’

Banana

100

250

117

161

05-12-1997

Long beans

172,173

238

Ginger

’’

Onion

’’

132

Yam

’’

Cabbage

’’

Beans

’’

Snake Gourd

’’

Plantain

101

249

106

135

Banana

’’

193

236

09-12-1997

Onion

174

234

64.5

11.5

Small Onion

’’

Chinese Potato

’’

132

148

Yam

’’

100

120

Snake Gourd

’’

Chilly

’’

Pumpkin

’’

Bitter Gourd

’’

Banana

103

247

160

200

Plantain

’’

160

191

11-12-1997

Lemon

175

237

Gooseberry

’’

Snake Gourd

’’

107

Chilly

’’

Mango

’’

Plan tain

104

246

142

173

Banana

’’

187

226

13-12-1997

Ladies finger

176

236

Bitter gourd

’’

Beans

’’

Yam

’’

100

Banana

106

244

123

Robusta

’’

341

380

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

1072

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

16-12-1997

Ginger

177

240

Chilly

’’

Ash Gourd

’’

Pumpkin

’’

Ladies finger

’’

Curry leaf

’’

Banana

108

242

109

120.5

11.5

Plantain

’’

174

183

Plantain

’’

In respect of Shri. V.G.K.Naidu

Relevant

entries in

Actual

Bills of

Account

quantity

Quantity

Excess

contractor

books of

supplied

certified

quantity

Occurrence

Items

(page in

K-I-

by P-C-

certified

dates

Ext- M 1

Varghese

canteen

Gopalan

(Kg.)

file)

(page in

(Kg.)

Ext-M1)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

16-08-1997

Ginger

63(a)

221

Onion

’’

100

Bitter gourd

’’

116

129

Chilly

’’

Drum stick

’’

Ladies finger

’’

16.5

19.5

Tamarind

’’

Ash Gourd

’’

Cabbage

’’

115

118

23-09-1997

No records

15-10-1997

Plantain

139 (a)

207

118

142

Plantain

’’

228

249

Banana

’’

122

168

16-10-1997

Banana

139(b)

206

135

178

Plantain

’’

114

159

20-10-1997

Plantain

141(a)&(b)

203

297

311

Banana

’’

119

132.5

13.5

Robusta

’’

Pineapple

’’

350

399

24-10-1997

Plantain

144(a)

199

106

109

28-10-1997

Banana

80(a)

197

119

142

Plan tain

’’

Robusta

’’

240

272

Banana

’’

11- 11-1997

Plantain

87(a)

191

126

253

127

Banana

’’

150

179

Plantain

’’

300

328

17-11-1997

Banana

89(a)

188

114

133

Plan tain

’’

26-11-1997

Banana

95(b)

181

105

118.5

13.5

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

1073

14. MW3, Sr. Accounts Officer (Vigilance) too has

prepared a statement containing the above details and it

is Exts. M21 to 26. But the competency of MW3 in

assessing the excess quantity certified is questioned by

the union. It is relevant to note that he has prepared only

a table comparing the quantity in the bills of the contractor

with those in the account books of wholesale merchants.

He has done only clerical work which anybody could do if

records are provided. There is no question of competency

or incompetency of a person in preparing a statement like

Exts. M21 to 26. The defence also has prepared a similar

statement and it is Ext.D-28. It shows that the

chargesheeted employees had certified less quantity of

goods than the quantity supplied by the contractor

whereby the company gained a profit rather than suffered

a loss. But Ext.D-28 is prepared on the premise that what is

certified is a lesser quantity. However it is to be noted that

the charge is different. As per the charge the workmen

certified more quantity than actual. To be more precise the

contractor had written a higher quantity than the actual in

the bills. The chargesheeted employees certified a

marginally lesser quantity than what is written by the

contractor. But the certified quantity is far above the actual

quantity. As a result the company suffered loss. But the

union questions the correctness of Ext.M-16 account book

on the ground that it contains only loose sheets and it is

not a proper account. So also Ext.M-17 is challenged on

the ground that it consists of handwritten bills and not

printed bills. The CBI had perused these bills, but did not

rely on to chargesheet the delinquents. The CBI referred

the case for want of materials by Ext.D-34 final report. It is

reported in Ext. D-34 that the account books of one Syed

Mohammed and V.A. Aliyar were perused. But they are

not properly maintained and some are even in the form of

loose sheets. So also the records in the vegetable shop of

K.I. Varghese, Thripunithura are not regularly maintained

in the normal course of business and hence not admissible

as a piece of evidence. Thus the final report does not say

that the account books, Exts.M-13 to 15 (relevant pages

Ext.M 16) are loose sheets. Only the account book of Aliyar

and Syed Mohammed are in the form of loose sheets. The

original account books Exts.M-13 to 15 were produced

along with photostat copies of relevant pages of those

books (Ext.M-16). There is no evidence to show that the

original books were maintained in loose sheets. The original

books are not made available to this court, but only

Ext.M16 relevant pages of those books. Since the

Photostat copies were marked while the originals were

before the Enquiry Officer it is not important that the

original should be before this court to decide the issue.

Even if they are available relevant pages Ext.M-16 need

alone be looked into for the purpose of the case. Ext.M-16

is contained in page 179 to 233 of Ext. M1 file. It is seen

from Ext.M-16 that different items of vegetables sold on

different dates are recorded date wise. The folios of

account books are numbered. In these circumstances it is

not possible to agree with the contention of the union that

the account books of K.I.Varghese are not regularly

maintained. The defence has no case that Ext.M-16 is not

the true copy of relevant pages of Ext.M-13 to 15.

15. The next objection of the union is that the

contractor used to purchase vegetables and fruits not only

from the shop of K.I. Varghese but from other shops as

well. He was also supplying goods to other places like

CRL Club, Choice School etc. Sri Bose (MW2) has

admitted that he used to purchase vegetables and fruits

from different sources besides the shop of K.I. Varghese

[page 180 in Ext. M 1 (a)]. It has come out from his testimony

that whatever things that were not available in the shop of

Shri. K.I. Varghese and things that were in short supply,

were purchased from other shops. But there was a

partnership between contractor and Sri. K. I.Varghese for

the purpose of supply of goods to CRL canteen though

Sri. Bose alone was the contractor. It is relevant to note

the testimony of MW4 the Inspector of Police, CBI at

[page 272 and 273 of Ext.Ml(a)]. He has stated that

contractor Bose used to purchase goods from

Perumbavoor, Ernakulam and Thripunithura markets and

bring them to the shop of Sri.K.I. Varghese at Thripunithura.

Thereafter the goods which are to be supplied to canteen

are weighed separately and packed. The details of such

things are recorded in the account books of Sri K.I.

Varghese. Then bills to be given to the CRL canteen are

prepared and supply is made to the canteen. MW3, the Sr.

Accounts Officer of management, who prepared Exts.M-

21 to 26 statements with reference to Ext.M-16 account

book has stated that the accounts found in Ext.M-16 are

complete so far as the dates mentioned therein are

concerned [page 258 of Ext.M1(a)].

16. It is pointed out by the learned counsel for the

union that there was an agreement between K.I.Varghese

and Bose that towards loss suffered by Mr. Varghese, Mr.

Bose would pay Rs.50,000. This is in respect of the supply

of goods to CRL canteen. The agreement is Ext.D-12. It is

stipulated in the agreement that since the goods supplied

to CRL canteen was not properly accounted in the account

books by Mr. K. I.Varghese and his Accountant, Sri. K. I.

Varghese has suffered a loss of Rs.50,000 which shall be

compensated by Mr. Bose within 6 months. In the light of

Ext.D-12 it is argued by the learned counsel for the union

that Ext.M-16 does not contain proper account of the goods

supplied to the canteen. When Sri. Bose (MW2) was

questioned in the cross-examination it is admitted by Bose

that there was a dispute between him and Varghese

regarding the amount due to Varghese in the partnership

business. There was negotiation and settlement as per

Ext.D-12 and thereafter the partnership was dissolved

[page 164 in Ext.M1(a). He has also given evidence that

Ext.D-12 agreement was entered into because Ext. M-16

accounts are not complete page 182 of Ext.M1(a)]. He has

further stated that goods supplied to CRL canteen are

written in the account books Exts.M-13 to 15. However

supply of all days are not recorded in the account books.

1074

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

On a comparison of Ext.M-16 with bills of the contractor it

is seen that the items supplied to the canteen on different

dates as per the bills of the contractor perfectly matches

with the items in Ext.M-16 except the quantity. No doubt

Bose has admitted that he had purchased goods from other

shops other than that of K.I.Varghese whenever there was

shortage of goods in the shop of Varghese. To prove such

purchase the workmen have produced Exts.D-18, 19, 20,

21, 22 and 26. But none of them are bills, but request letters

for supply of goods and letters regarding the balance

amounts due. If goods were purchased on the alleged

dates from shops other than that of K.I. Varghese the

workmen could have produced either bills or account

books or handwritten chits of the vegetable shops and

fruit shops or at least examined the shop owners to prove

that on the alleged dates Mr. Bose had purchased goods

from their shops. That would have explained how and

why the quantity supplied is more than the quantity

recorded in Exts.M-16 and M-17. No such efforts were

made by the defence. The burden is on the defence to

prove the allegation that more than the quantity mentioned

in Exts. M 16 & 17 were supplied to canteen once those

accounts are found to be proper. The partnership between

Bose and Varghese was not regarding the entire business

in the shop of K.I. Varghese, but only with regard to supply

of goods to CRL canteen. That is because Bose did not

own a vegetable shop of his own while he entered into a

contract with the society for supply of goods. In order to

keep a record of the supply of goods to the canteen Exts.

M 13 to 15 were maintained and their relevant folios are

Exts.M-16.

17. It was submitted by the learned counsel for the

union that Bose is an unreliable witness as he is chopping

and changing his version. Ext.M-16 account book kept in

the shop of K.I. Varghese was admittedly written by Bose

and the worker of K.I. Varghese [page 179 of Ext.M1(a)].

Bose had agreed to pay Rs.50,000 to Varghese as full and

final settlement of the partnership account because

Varghese suffered a loss of Rs.50,000 due to discrepancy

in the account (page 182). To a question in the cross-

examination that Varghese suffered loss of Rs.50,000 due

to the fact that Exts.M-13 to 15 is not a true and correct

account of supply of goods to canteen, his answer is that

the account books are not complete because some days

accounts are not written in the account books. However

things supplied to the canteen are the things recorded in

Ext.M-16 (page 182). To another question that Varghese

suffered loss because of the incorrect recording of quantity

of goods in Exts.M-13 to 15, his answer is that quantity is

correctly recorded (page 184) . To another question that

there was an agreement between parties (Ext.D-12) because

Ext.M-13 to 15 did not contain proper account of the

partnership, his answer is that the agreement was

executed, not because the account is not proper, but it is

incomplete (page 185). To another suggestion that among

the things supplied to canteen there were more things

than mentioned in Ext.M-16, his answer is that whatever

goods that are mentioned in Ext.M-16 were supplied, but

some days’ supply is not recorded (page 185). The same

thing is repeated at page 197 & 198. It is seen from the

testimony of Mr. Bose that he used to purchase goods not

only from the shop of Varghese but from other sources as

well. However the account books Exts.M-13 to 15 contain

record of supply of goods to CRL canteen. While settling

the account with Varghese a loss of Rs.50,000 was

assessed, not because the quantity written in Exts.M-13

to 15 is incorrect but because some days' supply is not

accounted in Exts.M-13 to 15. I have already mentioned

that even though goods were purchased from other

sources they were brought to the shop of K.I. Varghese

and from there the quantity that is required to be supplied

to canteen is separately weighed and such quantity is

recorded in Exts.M-13 to 15 account books. Regarding

supply of goods to canteen alone there is partnership

business between Bose and Varghese and not with regard

to supply of goods to CRL Club or Choice School.

18. It was pointed out then by the learned counsel

for the union that Exts. D2, D8, D10, M5 and M6 which are

the letters written by Bose and statements given to

Vigilance Officer of the company do not contain a

consistent version. Ext.D2 dated 7-01-1998 is a letter to

the President of the society wherein Mr. Bose states that

he has not committed any fraud or given money to any of

the Directors of the Director Board in connection with the

supply of goods to the canteen. Ext.D8 dated 19-12-1997

is another letter of Bose to the President wherein he alleges

that account maintained in the shop of Varghese is not

correctly written with regard to quantity. This was done

by the worker of Bose in his absence. Hence that worker

was relieved from duty and the partnership was dissolved.

However he denies any fraud in the matter of supply of

goods to the canteen or payment of bribe to the directors.

Ext.D-10 is another letter dated 28-01-1998 written by Bose

to the President alleging that the society had terminated

his contract for supply of vegetables and fruits to the

canteen with a view to give contract to somebody else.

But the contract was terminated without notice or giving

compensation for the loss suffered by him. He also refers

to the incident of 17-12-1997 in connection with which the

disciplinary action was taken against P.E. Gopalan

previously. Ext.M5 is a statement of Bose given to Sr.

Manager (Vigilance) of management company on

2-07-1998 wherein he has stated that there was an oral

agreement between him and Varghese in May 1997

regarding supply of goods to canteen and sharing of profit

equally. He also stated that he had given commission to

Directors who certified more quantity of goods. Ext.M6

dated 14-07-1998 is another statement given by Bose to

the Vigilance wherein he has stated that some of the

directors used to certify more quantity of goods than actual.

Sri. Baiju Paul was his worker and was cited as a

management witness in the enquiry. But Sri. Gopalan and

V.G.K. Naidu approached Mr.Bose and promised to pay

Rs.2,000 to Baiju Paul if he is prevented from being a

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

1075

witness of the management. According to the learned

counsel for the union the above documents show that

Mr.Bose does not have a consistent version and is not a

reliable witness. During cross-examination Bose stated that

he had signed Exts.D2, D8 and D10 letters for getting bill

amounts from the society. After those letters he had

received Rs.2,00,000 in February 1998 (page 174 and 175).

It is to be noted that Exts.D2, D8 and D 10 contain a uniform

version that there is no fraud in the matter of supply of

goods to canteen. But in Exts.M5 and M6 he has a different

version that the directors used to certify more quantity

and he had paid commission to them. The suggestion of

the defence is that after giving Exts.M5 and M6 statements

the society had paid the balance bill amounts. This is

admitted by Bose (page 175 & 176). He also admits that he

was called to CBI office and the Inspector of Police had

asked him to state in enquiry as required by Presenting

Officer (page 173 & 174). No doubt the CBI Inspector had

no business in giving direction to witnesses in a domestic

enquiry. His duty was only to investigate the crime and he

had filed a final report, Ext. D-34. He was showing undue

interest in domestic enquiry. Mr. Bose was then taken in a

Maruti Omni Van of CRL to a double storied building near

a guest house along with the staff of the company and he

was asked to give evidence in enquiry in tune with the

version of Ext.M5 given to the Vigilance Sr. Manager (page

174).

19. Assuming that the witness Bose is an unreliable

witness still that cannot affect the prosecution case. The

records speak for themselves about the fraud committed

by the workmen. Besides there is the oral testimony of

MW1 the President of the Society, MW3 Senior Accounts

Officer (Vigilance), MW4 CBI Inspector and MW6 Deputy

Manager (Vigilance) in support of the case of the

prosecution. Thus the charge that the workmen had

certified receipt of higher quantities of vegetables and

fruits while accepting supply in the canteen stands proved

and the findings of the Enquiry Officer on that score

cannot be said to be perverse.

20. The next charge is that the 2 workmen and

another (M. Ravi kumar) had received illegal gratification

to the tune of Rs.134,000 from Bose during the period of

contract as a consideration for certifying higher quantity

of goods than actual. According to Bose the payment was

made through his friend Sri. M.V. Mathai (MW5). MW5

had given a statement to Sr. Manager Vigilance on

16-07-1998 which is Ext.M-30. It is seen from the statement

that he was then working as Manager with a Transporting

Contractor, Sri. T.P. Jacob of Ambalamughal. Sri. Bose and

Sri. K.I. Varghese are known to him as they are from the

same locality. He further stated that Bose used to entrust

money to him for handing over the same to Naidu. Bose

had thus entrusted money 7 or 8 times. Though he had not

counted the currency the amount entrusted every time

must have been around Rs.10,000. Naidu used to visit his

office and receive the money. A similar statement was given

to Inspector CBI on 24-09-1999 (Ext.M-31). The statement

was recorded by MW4 Inspector of CBI, Sri. R. Remesan

Nair. There Sri. Mathai says that his office is opposite to

the main gate of CRL. Bose and himself belong to the

same parish. The version regarding entrustment of money

by Bose and payment to Naidu is the same as in Ext. M -30.

However when Mathai was examined (as MW5) though

he admitted that he had given a statement to vigilance and

signed that statement (Ext.M-30) he retracted from that

version and said that he had stated so due to the then

prevailing circumstances (page 286 and 287). Hence he

was cross-examined by the management. On further

questioning he admitted that he was called to CBI office

once and he had given a statement to CBI Inspector as

well similar to the statement in Ext.M-30 (page 291).

According to him the circumstances that compelled him to

give Ext.M-30 statement is that Mr.Bose had borrowed

Rs 40,000 from him and when he demanded the money,

Bose expressed his inability to repay because of

cancellation of his contract by the society and pendency

of bills for payment. Mr. Bose had told that if a favourable

statement is given to the company to prosecute the

directors the bills would be paid. Accordingly he gave

Ext.M-30 statement. The suggestion of the learned counsel

for the management is that by the time Mathai had given a

statement (Ext.M-31) to CBI Inspector on 24-09-1999 all

the amounts due to Bose from the society were already

paid. When it was suggested to Mathai during cross-

examination that the society had released all bill amounts

by December 1998, his answer was that he was not aware

whether Bose had received money by then and he came to

know of it only a week prior to his examination in enquiry.

To the CBI he had given Ext.M-31 statement 1/2 years

after Ext.M-30 statement. Therefore Mathai had time to

retract from Ext.M-30 statement and could give a correct

version at least to the Inspector, CBI while Ext.M-31

statement was given. Having admitted Ext.M-30 & 31

statements as given to Vigilance and CBI, subsequent

deviation from it is only an afterthought and for extraneous

reasons. MW4 CBI Inspector has stated that he had

recorded the statement of Sri. Mathai (page 276). MW2

Bose during cross-examination and on insistence stated

that his average profit per month was Rs.10,000. His total

profit during a period of 6 months of contract was around

Rs.60,000. Therefore it is argued by the learned counsel

for the union that a person who made a profit of Rs.60,000

during the period of contract could not have given bribe

of Rs. l,34,000 to the workmen. But it is relevant to note

that it was to a persistent question by the defence that he

had said so and cannot mean that it is an accurate account

of his profit. Normally no businessman will disclose his

actual profit except for the purpose of tax. It is relevant to

note Ext.M-34 minutes of Director Board Meeting. Bose

was called before the Board and asked to explain the

incident with regard to supply of goods and payments to

the Directors. He told then that he had done business for

Rs.16,00,000 in the contract with the society and made a

profit of 10 to 15% during the period of contract (page 305

1076

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

of Ext.M1). If that be so, I don’t think that there is any

discrepancy in contending that Bose had given a bribe of

Rs.1,34,000 to the directors who had certified excess

quantity. According to Sri. Bose the money that was given

were shared by the three directors who had certified more

quantity of goods. In the above circumstances I hold that

there is no perversity in the finding of Enquiry Officer that

the workmen had received illegal gratifications from Sri.

Bose. The quantum of the payment is not very relevant.

Whatever be the amount that is given as bribe is bribe

itself, irrespective of the quantum and a misconduct within

the provisions of Standing Orders of the company.

21. In the light of the evidence and circumstances

aforesaid I hold that the findings of Enquiry Officer are

supported by materials on record and there is no merit in

the contention of the union that the findings are perverse.

22. Point No.2:- The punishment imposed on Sri.

P.C. Gopalan is demotion as General Craftsman (Fitter) at

the lowest stage in Grade VI w.e.f. 01-08-2001 and on Naidu

demotion as Fire Truck Driver/Panel Operator at the lowest

stage in Grade.V w.e.f. 01-08-2001. Since the misconduct

proved is serious in nature it can never be said that the

punishment imposed is in anyway harsh or excessive. That

apart, since the punishment is not one falling within S.11-

A of I.D. Act, i.e. discharge or dismissal, this court has no

power to interfere with the punishment.

In the result an award is passed finding that the

action of the management in imposing the punishment of

reduction to lower grade on Sri. V.G.K. Naidu is legal and

justified and the quantum of punishment imposed on Sri.

P.C. Gopalan is also legal, proper and proportionate to the

charges and both of them are not entitled for any relief.

The award will come into force one month after its

publication in the Official Gazette. Dictated to the Personal

Assistant, transcribed and typed by her, corrected and

passed by me on this the 16th day of November, 2010.

P. L. NORBERT, Presiding Officer

Appendix

Witness for the Unions

Nil.

Witness for the Management

Nil.

Exhibits for the Union

Nil.

Exhibits for the management

Documents in enquiry.

M 1 (a)

Deposition of witnesses.

M 1 (b)

Copies of show-cause notices issued to

the workmen, replies of workmen and

punishment

orders

issued

disciplinary authority.

M 1 (c)

Supplementary documents that the

management had omitted to incorporate

in Ext.M 1.

vkns'k

ubZ fnYyh] 3 tuojh] 2011

dk-vk- 383-µtcfd Hkkjrh; [kk| fuxe ds izca/u vkSj

muds dkexkjksa ds chp fo|eku ,d vkS|ksfxd fookn dks fnukad

26&10&2004 ds lela[;d vkns'k }kjk U;k;&fu.kZ;u gsrq dsUnzh;

ljdkj vkS|ksfxd U;k;kf/dj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky; la[;k 1] ubZ

fnYyh dks lan£Hkr fd;k x;k Fkk A

vkSj tcfd lacaf/r i{kdkjkas us bl ekeys dks U;k;&fu.kZ;u

gsrq jk"Vªh; U;k;kf/dj.k dks lan£Hkr fd, tkus ds laca/ esa ljdkj

dks vH;kosnu fn, Fks D;kasfd fookn esa varxzZLr eqík Hkkjrh; [kk|

fuxe ds fofHkUUk jkT;ksa esa fLFkr fMiqvksa ls lacaf/r gS A

vkSj tcfd ekuuh; fnYyh mPp U;k;ky; us fjV ;kfpdk

la[;k 3792@2004 esa ljdkj dks bl fookn dks jk"Vªh; vkS|ksfxd

U;k;kf/dj.k dks lan£Hkr fd, tkus rFkk fopkjkFkZ fo"k; dks

la'kksf/r fd, tkus dk funs'k fn;k gS A

vr% vc dsUnzh; ljdkj] vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947

(1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 7 [k }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs

gq, ,d jk"Vªh; vkS|ksfxd U;k;kf/dj.k dk xBu djrh gS ftldk

eq[;ky; eqEcbZ esa gksxk vkSj orZeku esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

U;k;kf/dj.k la[;k 1] eqEcbZ esa ihBklhu vf/dkjh U;k;ew£r

Jh ?ku';ke nkl dks blds ihBklhu vf/dkjh ds :i esa fu;qDr

djrh gS rFkk mDr vf/fu;e dh /kjk 10 dh mi&/kjk (1d)

}kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;kas dk iz;ksx djrs gq, mDr vkS|ksfxd fookn dks

la'kksf/r@vk'kksf/r fopkjkFkZ fo"k; ds lkFk U;k;&fu.kZ;u gsrq mDr

jk"Vªh; vkS|ksfxd U;k;kf/dj.k dks lan£Hkr djrh gS A

vkSj tcfd U;k;ew£r Jh ?ku';ke nkl us fnukad 6&2&2006

dks mDr jk"Vªh; vkS|ksfxd U;k;kf/dj.k dk dk;ZHkkj NksM+ fn;k

Fkk A

vr% vc ,d jk"Vªh; vkS|ksfxd U;k;kf/dj.k dk xBu

fd;k tkrk gS ftldk eq[;ky; eqEcbZ eas gksxk rFkk U;k;ew£r

Jh xkSjh 'kdj ljkZiQ] ihBklhu vf/dkjh dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

U;k;kf/dj.k la[;k 1] eqEcbZ ihBklhu vf/dkjh gksaxs rFkk mi;qZDr

fookn dks U;k;fu.kZ;u gsrq mi;qZDr jk"Vªh; vkS|ksfxd U;k;kf/dj.k

dks bl funs'k ds lkFk lan£Hkr fd;k tkrk gS fd U;k;ew£r Jh xkSjh

'kadj ljkZiQ] bl ekeys esa ml voLFkk ls vkxs dk;Zokgh djsaxs

tgka ij bls U;k;ew£r Jh ?ku';ke nkl us NksM+k Fkk vkSj rnuqlkj

mldk fuiVku djsaxs A

tgka rd bl ea=kky; ds fnukad 26&10&2004 ds lela[;d

vkns'k ds rgr ljdkj }kjk fo|eku fookn dks dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd U;k;kf/dj.k dks lan£Hkr fd, tkus dk laca/ gS]vkS|ksfxd

fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 dh /kjk 10 dh mi&/kjk 6 (d) ds

mica/ ykxw gksaxs A

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

1077

vuqlwph

^^D;k Hkkjrh; [kk| fuxe }kjk ifji=k uksfVl la[;k fnukad

1&7&2002 vkSj ifji=k la[;k 1 vkSj 2 nksuksa fnukad

19&1&2004 }kjk vius [kk|kUu gSaM¯yx dkexkjksa dh

le;ksifj etnwjh njksa dks 6&1@2 vkSj 8 cts ds chp le;ksifj

dk;Z gsrq etnwjh dh lkekU; njksa dk 1-25 xquk ls ?kVkdj

1-1 xquk vkSj vkxs 8 cts ds dk;Z gsrq lacaf/r jkT;ksa ds

nqdkuksa ,oa izfr"Bku vf/fu;e ds vuqlkj 1-1 xquk djus

dh dkjZokbZ fof/lEer rFkk U;k;ksfpr gS\ ;fn ugha] rks

dkexkj fdl jkgr ds ik=k gS\ **

¹la- ,y&22012@359@2003&vkbZ vkj(lh&II)º

Mh- ,l- ,l- ,l- jko] MsLd vf/dkjh

ORDER

New Delhi, the 3rd January, 2011

S.O. 383.— Whereas an industrial dispute between

employers in relation to management of FCI and their

workmen was referred for adjudication to Central

Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No.1,

New Delhi vide order of even number dated 26-10-2004.

And whereas the parties concerned made

representations to the Government for referring the matter

for adjudication to National Tribunal as the issue involved

in the dispute pertains to depots of FCI located at various

States.

And whereas the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi in

W.P. No. 3792/2004 has given a direction to the Government

to refer the dispute to a National Industrial Tribunal and to

modify the terms of reference.

Now, therefore the Central Government in exercise of

the powers conferred by Section 7B of the I.D. Act, 1947

(14 of 1947), hereby constitutes a National Industrial

Tribunal with the Head Quarters at Mumbai and appoint

Justice Shri Ghanshyam Dass, presently Presiding Officer,

CGIT No.1, Mumbai as its Presiding Officer, and in exercise

of the powers conferred by sub-section (1A) of Section 10

of the Industrial Disputes Act, hereby refers the said

Industrial Dispute to the said National Tribunal for

adjudication with revised/modified terms of reference.

And whereas Justice Shri Ghanshyam Dass

relinquished the charge of the said National Industrial

Tribunal on 6-2-2006.

Now, therefore, a National Industrial Tribunal is

constituted with Headquarters at Mumbai with Justice

Shri Gauri Shanker Sarraf, Presiding Officer of CGIT No.1,

Mumbai as its Presiding Officer and the above said dispute

is referred to the above said National Industrial Tribunal

for adjudication with a direction that justice Shri Gauri

Shanker Sarraf shall proceed in the matter from the stage at

which it was left by Justice Shri Ghanshyam Dass and

dispose of the same accordingly.

As regard the existing reference of the dispute made

by the Government vide this ministry’s order of even number

dated 26-10-2004 to Central Government Industrial Tribunal

No.1, New Delhi, the provisions of sub-section 6 (a) of

Section 10 of the I.D. Act 1947 will apply.

SCHEDULE

‘‘Whether the action of the Food Corporation of

India in reducing the rates of Overtime wages of its

food handling workers from 1.25 times to 1.1 times of

the normal rates of wages for overtime work between

6 -1/2 and 8 hours and further from as per the Shops

& Establishment Act of the respective states to 1.1

times for work beyond 8 hours both by Circular

Notice dated 1-7-2002 and Circulars No. 1 & 2 both

dated 19-1-2004 is legal and justified? If not, to what

relief the workmen are entitled?’’

[No. L-22012/359/2003-IR (C-II)]

D.S.S.S. RAO, Desk Officer

vkns'k

ubZ fnYyh] 3 tuojh] 2011

dk-vk- 384-µtcfd dsUnzh; ljdkj dk fopkj gS fd

ctkt bySfDVªdYl fyfeVsM ds izca/u ,oa muds deZdkjkas ds chp

,d vkS|ksfxd fookn fo|eku gS %

vkSj tcfd ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; vgenkckn

xqtjkr us izdh.kZ flfoy vkosnu la- 1711@2003 esa izdh.kZ flfoy

vkosnu la- 1943@2003 esa bl ekeys dks vkS|ksfxd fookn

vf/fu;e] 1947 ds izko/kuksa ds varxZr lqy>kus rFkk leqfpr

fu.kZ; ysus dk funs'k fn;k Fkk A

vkSj tcfd ctkt bySfDVªdYl fyfeVsM ds dbZ jkT;ksa esa

fLFkr izfr"Bku blls lac¼ vFkok izHkkfor gksus dh laHkkouk gS_

vkSj tcfd dsUnzh; ljdkj dk ;g fopkj gS fd mi;qZDr

fookn dk U;k;&fu.kZ;u jk"Vªh; U;k;kf/dj.k }kjk fn;k tkuk

pkfg,_

vkSj tcfd dsUnzh; ljdkj us vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e]

1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 7 [k }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx

djrs gq, Je ea=kky; ds fnukad 6&9&2004 ds vkns'k la-

,y&42012@144@2004&vkbZ vkj (lh&II) ds }kjk ,d jk"Vªh;

vkS|ksfxd U;k;kf/dj.k dk xfBr fd;k gS ftldk eq[;ky; eqEcbZ

esa j[kk x;k Fkk vkSj U;k;ew£r Jh ,l- lh- ik.Ms; dks bldk

ihBklhu vf/dkjh fu;qDr x;k Fkk rFkk mDr vf/fu;e dh /kjk

10 dh mi&/kjk (1&d) }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;kas dk iz;ksx djrs gq,

mDr vkS|ksfxd fookn dks U;k;&fu.kZ;u gsrq mijksDr jk"Vªh;

vkS|ksfxd U;k;kf/dj.k dks lan£Hkr fd;k x;k Fkk A

1078

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

vkSj tcfd U;k;ew£r Jh ,l- lh- ik.Ms; us fnukad

8&9&2004 dks mijksDr jk"Vªh; vkS|ksfxd U;k;kf/dj.k dk dk;ZHkkj

NksM+ fn;k Fkk A

vkSj tcfd dsUnzh; ljdkj] us fnukad 10&11&2005 ds

vkns'k }kjk jk"Vªh; U;k;kf/dj.k dks iquxZfBr fd;k Fkk vkSj U;k;ew£r

Jh ?ku';ke nkl dks blds ihBklhu vf/dkjh ds :i esa fu;qDr

fd;k Fkk A

vkSj tcfd U;k;ew£r Jh ?ku';ke nkl us fnukad 6&2&2006

dks mDr jk"Vªh; U;k;kf/dj.k dk dk;ZHkkj NksM+ fn;k Fkk A

vr% vc ,d jk"Vªh; vkS|ksfxd U;k;kf/dj.k dk xBu

fd;k tkrk gS ftldk eq[;ky; eqEcbZ esa gksxk ftlds ihBklhu

vf/dkjh jk"Vªh; vkS|ksfxd U;k;kf/dj.k 1] eqEcbZ esa U;k;ew£r

Jh xkSjh 'kdj ljkZiQ gksaxs rFkk mi;qZDr fookn dks U;k;&fu.kZ;u ds

fy, mDr jk"Vªh; vkS|ksfxd U;k;kf/dj.k dks bl funs'k ds lkFk

lan£Hkr fd;k tkrk gS fd U;k;ew£r Jh xkSjh 'kadj ljkZiQ] bl

ekeys esa ml Lrj ls vkxs dk;Zokgh djsaxs tgka U;k;ew£r

Jh ?ku';ke nkl us bls NksM+k Fkk rFkk rnuqlkj bl ekeys dks

fuiVk,axs A

¹la- ,y&42012@144@2004&vkbZ vkj(lh&II)º

Mh- ,l- ,l- ,l- jko] MsLd vf/dkjh

ORDER

New Delhi, the 3rd January, 2011

S.O. 384.— Whereas the Central Government is of

the opinion that an industrial dispute exists between

management of Bajaj Electricals Limited and their

workmen :

And whereas the Hon’ble High Court of Gujarat at

Ahemdabad in Misc. Civil Application No. 1943/2003 in

Misc. Civil Application No. 1711/2003 gave a direction to

consider the matter under the provision of Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 and take appropriate decision.

And whereas the establishment of Bajaj Electricals

Limited situated in more than one State are likely to be

interested in, or affected;

And whereas the Central Government is of the

opinion that the said dispute should be adjudicated by a

National Tribunal;

And whereas the Central Government in exercise of

the powers conferred by Section 7B of the I.D. Act, 1947

(14 of 1947), constituted a National Industrial Tribunal

vide Ministry of Labour Order No. L -42012/144/2004-IR

(C-II) dated 6-9-2004 with headquarters at Mumbai and

appointed Justice Shri S. C. Pandey as its Presiding

Officer, and in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-

section (1A) of Section 10 of the said Act, referred the said

Industrial Dsipute to the said National Industrial Tribunal

for adjudication .

And whereas Justice Shri S. C. Pandey relinquished

charge of the above National Industrial Tribunal on

8-9-2004.

And whereas the Central Government vide order

dated 10-11-2005 reconstituted the National Tribunal and

appointed Justice Shri Ghanshyam Dass as its Presiding

Officer.

And whereas Justice Shri Ghanshyam Dass

relinquished the charge of the said National Industrial

Tribunal on 6-2-2006.

Now, therefore, a National Industrial Tribunal is

constituted with Headquarters at Mumbai with Justice

Shri Gauri Shanker Sarraf, Presiding Officer of CGIT No.1,

Mumbai as its Presiding Officer and the above said dispute

is referred to the above said National Industrial Tribunal

for adjudication with a direction that justice Shri Gauri

Shanker Sarraf shall proceed in the matter from the stage at

which it was left by Justice Shri Ghanshyam Dass and

dispose of the same accordingly.

[No. L-42012/144/2004-IR (C-II)]

D.S.S.S. RAO, Desk Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 5 tuojh] 2011

dk- vk- 385-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh; ljdkj fgUnqLrku

isVªksfy;e dkiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj

muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky; ] ukxiqj ds

iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 25@2008) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh;

ljdkj dks 5&1&2011 dks izkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y&30011@6@2008&vkbZ vkj (,e)º

jes'k ¯lg] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 5th January, 2011

S. O. 385.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 25/2008)

of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour

Court, Nagpur now as shown in the Annexure, in the

Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to

the management of Hindustan Petrolem Corpo. Ltd. and

their workmen, which was received by the Central

Government on 5-1-2011.

[ No. L-30011/6/2008-IR (M)]

RAMESH SINGH, Desk Officer

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

1079

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI J. P. CHAND, PRESIDING OFFICER,

CGIT-CUM-LABOUR COURT, NAGPUR

Case No. CGIT/NGP/25/2008

Date : 21-12-2010

Petitioner/

Party No. 1

The General Secretary,

Bhartiya Janata Kamgar Mahasangh,

Maharashtra, 21/7 E, Press Mill Chawl,

Opp. Chacha Nehru Bal Bhawan,

Subhash Road,

Nagpur

Versus

Respondent/

Party No. 2

The Plant Manager,

Hindustan Petroleum Corp. Ltd.,

LPG Plant, Khapri,Wardha Road,

Nagpur.

AWARD

(Dated : 21st December, 2010)

In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of

sub-section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) (‘‘the Act’’ in

short), the Central Government has referred the industrial

dispute between the employers, in relation to the

management of Hindustan Petroleum Corp. Ltd., LPG

Plant and their workmen for adjudication, as per letter No.

L-30011/6/2008-IR (M) dated 29-7-2008, with the following

schedule :—

“Whether the action of the management of HPCL

in terminating the services of 28 workmen (as

mentioned in Annexure) engaged through the

contractor is legal and just? If not, to what relief the

workmen are entitled ?”

2. Though, in this case, the reference had been

recieved by the Tribunal on 7-8-2008 and the union

representative on behalf of the workmen had been directed

to file the statement of claim, till 19-10-2010, the statement

of claim had not been filed by the union representative.

However, in the interest of justice, on 19-10-2010, a last

chance was given to the union representative to file the

statement of claim on 21-12-2010. On 21-12-2010, non

appeared on behalf of the workman. No statement of

claim was also filed on that date. Hence the case was

closed for passing award.

3. From the facts that no statement of claim was filed

by the union representative on behalf of the workmen. It

is found that the workmen are not interested to proceed

with the case. Hence, it is necessary to pass a no dispute

award. Hence, it is ordered :

ORDER

The case be treated as ‘‘no dispute award’’, due to

the default of the workmen.

J. P. CHAND, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 5 tuojh] 2011

dk- vk- 386-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh; ljdkj fgUnqLrku

isVªksfy;e dkiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj

muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] ukxiqj ds iapkV

(lanHkZ la[;k 52@2007) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj

dks 5&1&2011 dks izkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y&30011@81@2004&vkbZ vkj (,e)º

jes'k ¯lg] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 5th January, 2011

S. O. 386.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 52/2007)

of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour

Court, Nagpur now as shown in the Annexure, in the

Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to

the management of Hindustan Petrolem Corpo. Ltd., LPG

Filling Plant, Khapri and their workmen, which was

received by the Central Government on 5-1-2011.

[ No. L-30011/81/2004-IR (M)]

RAMESH SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI J. P. CHAND, PRESIDING OFFICER,

CGIT-CUM-LABOUR COURT, NAGPUR

Case No. CGIT/NGP/52/2007

Date : 21-12-2010

Petitioner/

Party No. 1

The General Secretary,

Bhartiya Janata Kamgar Mahasangh,

Maharashtra, Tilak Putla Karyalaya,

Mahal,

Nagpur-440 002

Versus

Respondent/

Party No. 2

1080

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

The Plant Manager,

Hindustan Petroleum Corp. Ltd.,

LPG Filling Plant, Khapri,

Wardha Road,

Nagpur.

AWARD

(Dated : 21st December, 2010)

In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of

sub-section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of

Industrial Disdutes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) (‘‘the Act’’ in

short), the Central Government has referred the industrial

dispute between the employers, in relation to the

management of M/s. Hindustan Petroleum Corp. Ltd.,

(‘‘HPCL’’ in short) and their workmen for adjudication, as

per letter No. L-30011/81/2004-IR (M) dated 7-9-2007, with

the following schedule :—

“Whether the demand of the Bhartiya Janata

Kamgar Mahasangh, Maharashtra, Nagpur for

employment and regularization of S/Sh. Gajanan

Narayan Ghatate, Subhash Ajayabrao Navghare,

Sanjay Seshrao Bobde, Sriram Somaji Bhagat, Hari

Bhimrao Kolhe and Sanjay Sriram Bhagat, contract

workers in the service of M/s. Hindustan Petroleum

Corp. Ltd., LPG Filling Plant, Khapri, Nagpur

justified? If so, to what relief the concerned workmen

are entitled to?”

2. Though, in this case, the reference had been

recieved by the Tribunal on 25-9-2007 and the union

representative on behalf of the workmen had been directed

to file the statement of claim, till 19-10-2010, the statement

of claim had not been filed by the union representative.

However, in the interest of justice, on 19-10-2010, a last

chance was given to the union representative to file the

statement of claim on 21-12-2010. On 21-12-2010, non

appeared on behalf of the workman. No statement of

claim was also filed on that date. Hence the case was

closed for passing award.

3. From the facts that no statement of claim was filed

by the union representative on behalf of the workmen. It

is found that the workmen are not intersted to proceed

with the case. Hence, it is necessary to pass a no dispute

award. Hence, it is ordered :

ORDER

The case be treated as ‘‘no dispute award’’, due to

the default of the workmen.

J. P. CHAND, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 5 tuojh] 2011

dk- vk- 387-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14 dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh; ljdkj fgUnqLrku

isVªksfy;e dkiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj

muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] ukxiqj ds iapkV

(lanHkZ la[;k 2@2009) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj

dks 5&1&2011 dks izkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y&30011@24@2006&vkbZ vkj (,e)º

jes'k ¯lg] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 5th January, 2011

S.O. 387.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 2/2009)

of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Nagpur now as shown in the Annexure, in

the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation

to the management of Hindustan Petroleum Corpo. Ltd.

and their workmen, which was received by the Central

Government on 5-1-2011.

[ No. L-30011/24/2006-IR (M)]

RAMESH SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI J. P. CHAND, PRESIDING OFFICER,

CGIT-CUM-LABOUR COURT, NAGPUR

Case No. CGIT/NGP/2/2009

Date : 21-12-2010

Petitioner/

Party No. 1

The General Secretary,

Bhartiya Janata Kamgar Mahasangh,

Maharashtra, Tilak Putala Karyalaya,

Mahal,

Nagpur - 440 002

Versus

Respondent/

Party No. 2

The Plant Manager,

Hindustan Petroleum Corp. Ltd.,

LPG Plant, Khapri,

Wardha Road,

Nagpur.

AWARD

(Dated : 21st December, 2010)

In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of

sub-section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of

Industrial Disdutes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) (‘‘the Act’’ in

short), the Central Government has referred the industrial

dispute between the employers, in relation to the

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

1081

management of Hindustan Petroleum Corp. Ltd. (‘‘HPCL’’

in short) and their workmen for adjudication, as per letter

No. L-30011/24/2006-IR(M) dated 20-1-2009, with the

following schedule :—

“Whether the action of the management of

M/s. National Security Services, contractor of LPG

Plant of HPCL, Khapri Distt. Nagpur in terminating

the services of the contract security guards, namely,

S/Shri J. S. Thakre, R.K. Pawar, P.D. Aajatker,

S.H.Khade and H.C. Bobade w.e.f. 19-4-2005,

14-5-2005, 14-5-2005, 14-5-2005 and 23-6-2005

respectively is legal and justified? To what relief

the workmen are entitled ?”

2. Though, in this case, the reference had been

received by the Tribunal on 29-1-2009 and the union

representative on behalf of the workmen had been directed

to file the statement of claim, till 19-10-2010, statement of

claim had not been filed by the union representative.

However, in the interest of justice, on 19-10-2010, a last

chance was given to the union representative to file the

statement of claim on 21-12-2010. On 21-12-2010, non

appeared on behalf of the workman. No statement of

claim was also filed on that date. Hence the case was

closed for passing award.

3. From the facts that no statement of claim was filed

by the union representative on behalf of the workmen. It

is found that the workmen are not interested to proceed

with the case. Hence, it is necessary to pass a no dispute

award. Hence, it is ordered :

ORDER

The case be treated as ‘‘no dispute award’’, due to

the default of the workmen.

J. P. CHAND, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 5 tuojh] 2011

dk-vk- 388.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh; ljdkj Hkkjr isVªksfy;e

dkiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds

deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky; ] eqEcbZ ds iapkV (lanHkZ

la[;k 44@2005) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

5&1&2011 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&30015@2@2005&vkbZ vkj (,e)º

jes'k ¯lg] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 5th January, 2011

S.O.388.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No 44 of

2005) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-Labour

Court, Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure in the

Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to

the management of Bharat Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. and

their workmen, which was received by the Central

Government on 5-1-2011.

[No. L-30015/2/2005-IR (M)]

RAMESH SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 2, MUMBAI

PRESENT

K. B. KATAKE,

Presiding Officer

Reference No. CGIT-2/44 of 2005

Employers in Relation to the Management of Bharat

Petrolem Corporation Ltd.

The Chairman and Managing Director,

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.

Bharat Bhavan

Ballard Estate

Mumbai - 400 038.

AND

Their Workmen

The Secretary,

Mumbai Shramik Sangh,

Sangarsh,

Quarry Road

Bhandup (W)

Mumbai - 400078

APPEARANCES :

For the Employer :

Mr. R.S. Pai, Advocate.

For the Workmen :

No appearance.

Mumbai, dated 1st December, 2010

AWARD

1.The Government of India, Ministry of Labour and

Employment by its Order No. L-30015/2/2005-IR (M) dated

13-1-2005 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause

(d) of sub- section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of Section 10

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 have referred the

following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for

adjudication :—

“ Whether the contract between the contractor and

the BPCL is sham and bogus and is a camouflage to

deprive the workmen whose names are enlisted at

Exhibit ‘A’ from the benefits available to permanent

workers of the BPCL ?”

1082

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

“ Whether the workmen whose names are enlisted

at Exhibit ‘‘A’’ should be declared as permanent

workers and wages and consequential benefits be

paid to them ?”

Annexure ‘‘A’’

List of workmen working under Everst Farm & Gardens

Sr. No.

Name

Years of service

(1)

(2)

(3)

Anjanabai S. Kahar

Gangaram Nallappa

Sharanamma Balaram

Kantamma Nandu

Shashikala B. Dushing

Sitabai L. Kamble

Sundharrao Benjamin

Prabhakaran

Saraswati Kumbhar

10.

Kamlabi Savble

11.

Sushilabai Mohan Kumar

Kamble

12.

Kamlabai Paronna

Kamble

13.

Krishnabai Vithal

Mawarkar

14.

Chandrabhage D. Vaity

15.

Laxmibai R. Sebane

16.

Jetubai N. Jogdambar

17.

Julekhabai S. Abdullah

18.

Mirabai N. Kothawle

19.

Anusuya Bhagwat

Chinne

20.

Gangubai Y. Kamble

21.

Jayashree Y. Jadhav

22.

Kamble P. Khandu

23.

Raja Kandasari

24.

Janardhan D. Ayre

25.

Harishchandra

Manjrekar

26.

Balu Thorat

27.

Ramappa Betappa

28.

Saraswati M. Pawar

29.

Draupadi E. Dhave

30.

Rangappa Naidu

31.

Parvati A. Watkar

32.

Ashabai

33.

Martamma

34.

Narsamma Gangaram

35.

Laxmibai

36.

Shakuntalabai

37.

Kalawatibai

38.

Kashibai

39.

Panjabai

40.

Saraswatbai

41.

Neelabai

42.

Zaranabai

43.

Parvatibai

44.

Sindubai

45.

Surekhabai

46.

Sonmare Jagannath

47.

Prabhakar

List of workmen working under Subash Gardens in Co.

Sl. No.

Name

Years of service

Pradeep Tapase

Sanjay Kamble

Pandurang Thatte

Shyam Oak

Mangesh Gaikwad

Suresh Suryavanshi

Balaji Gire

Prabhakar Singade

Rausabhab Banayat

10.

Manshabai

11.

Kamalabai

12.

Ayamma

13.

Veeramma

14.

Parvitabai

15.

Tipamma

16.

Jagdevi

(1)

(2)

(3)

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

1083

Dilip Nana Thombe

Bhabudas Manohar

Rathod

Suresh Vithal Shinde

Yevan Tagaram Jairam

Mandakini D. Shinde

Ambadas N. Khude

2. In respone to the notices, the second party who is

trade union registered under Trade Union’s Act, 1926 filed

its statement of claim at Ex-8. According to it, 47 workmen

of their union were in employment of first party for

gardening, horticulture and environmental maintenance

department. They were employed through so called

contractor, M/s. Everest Farms and Gardens. The first party

Company has also enployed another 16 employees

through the so called contractor M/s. Subash Gardens.

The names of employees and years of their service are

given by a separate list at Ex.A, B & C. All the workmen are

members of second party union. though the workers were

employed by the first party, it is wrongly shown that, they

are employed through contractor. The contract between

Contractor and BPCL is infact sham and bogus therefore,

the workmen whose names are in list ‘A’ moved an

application requesting that they be declared as permanent

workers and wages and consequential benefits be given to

them. The first party company refused for the same.

Therefore matter was taken to ALC (C) for conciliation. As

conciliation failed the ALC (C) sent the industrial dispute

to Ministry of Labour. The Ministry of Labour sent the

reference to this Tribunal to determine whether the contract

between contractor and BPCL is sham and bogus and is

camouflage to deprive the workmen in list ‘A’ from the

benefit of permanent workers of BPCL and for declaration

whether workmen in list ‘A’ can be declared permanent

workers and whether they are entitled to the wages and

consequential benefits.

3. The first party BPCL has resisted the statement of

claim vide its written statement Ex.-11. They denied all the

allegations. According to them the workers in the list ‘A’

were engaged by the contractor namely Everest Farms

and Gardens, and M/s. Subash Gardens. They further

contended that, the employees were employed in the

Sports Club and Trombay Club and housing colony for

activities such as house keeping, gardening and

horticulture. Such activities do not fall in the definition

of ‘industry’ within the meaning of Section 2 (j) of the

Industrial Disputes Act. Therefore, they submitted that

the reference is not maintainable and the same is liable to

be rejected. The union has filed WP 741/91, before

Hon’ble Bombay High Court seeking abolition of contract

labour in the housing Colony, Trombay Club. The Hon’ble

Division Bench disposed of the said writ petition by its

order dated 13-1-2005 with a direction to the Government

to refer the matter. According to them as the said relief is

outside the jurisdiction of this Tribunal, the same deserves

to be rejected. The first party also denied all the contents

in the statement of claim and prays that the reference be

rejected.

4. In the light of rival pleadings, my learned

Predecessor has framed following issues at Ex-13 for

determination.

ISSUES

FINDINGS

(i)

Whether contract

between contractor

and first party is

sham and bogus

as alleged

In the negative

(ii)

Whether the workmen

whose names are

enlisted at Ex-A to

the schedule of

claim statement are

required to declare

as permanent

employees of the

first party?

In the negative

(iii)

Is second party

entitled for any

declaration?

In the negative

(iv)

What order?

As per order.

Issues nos. 1 to 3:—

5. The reference was kept for filing documents and

recording evidence of the second party union. The first

date of hearing was 2-7-2010. Before that, the union has

moved interim application. However, neither the union not

their advocate were present. Therefore their interim

application was kept for hearing along with the reference.

The union and their advocate stopped attending the

proceeding since January 2009. Even after framing of issues

union and their advocate remained absent. As the union

and their advocate remained absent and did not file their

documents of affidavit by way of evidence, the reference

deserves to be dismissed for want of prosecution. The

second party has not lead any evidence to show that the

contract between the contractor and BPCL is sham and

bogus. Therefore neither the contract can be declared bogus

and sham, nor the workmen are entitled to the declaration

that they are permanent employees of first party. So also

they are not entitled to the declaration in respect of pay

and ancillary benefits. Accordingly I decide these issues

nos.1 to 3 in the negative and proceed to pass the following

order :

(1)

(2)

(3)

1084

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ORDER

The reference stands rejected for

want of prosecution.

Date : 1-12-2010

K. B. KATAKE, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 10 tuojh] 2011

dk-vk- 389-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh; ljdkj Mkd foHkkx

ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ

la[;klhthvkbZVh@,ylh@vkj@118@2005) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks

dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 10&1&2011 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&40012@42@2005&vkbZ vkj (Mh;w)º

jes'k ¯lg] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 10th January, 2011

S.O. 389.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGIT/

LC/R/118/2005) of the Central Government Industrial

Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the

Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers

in relation to the management of Department of Post and

their workmen, which was received by the Central

Government on 10-1-2011.

[No. L-40012/42/2005-IR (DU)]

RAMESH SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

JABALPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/R/118/2005

PRESIDING OFFICER : SHRI MOHD. SHAKIR HASAN

Smt. Savitri Bai Joshi,

W/o Rakesh Joshi,

Shed No.104-B, Sector, 40 Quarters,

Near Ram Mandir, Piplani

Bhopal (MP)

. . .Workman/Union

Versus

The Sub Post Master,

Post Office,

Piplani.,

Bhopal (MP)

. ..Management

AWARD

Passed on this 27th day of December, 2010

1. The Government of India, Ministry of Labour vide

its Notification No.-L-40012/42/2005-IR (DU) dated

18-10-2005 has referred the following dispute for

adjudication by this Tribunal :—

“Whether the action of the management of Sub-

Post Master, Post Office, Bhopal in terminating

the services of Smt. Savitri Bai W/o Shri Rakesh

Joshi w.e.f. 14-8-03 is justified? If not, to what

relief she is entitled for ?”

2. The case of the workman in short is that

Smt. Savitri Bai was appointed as waterwoman in place of

her mother on 30-7-1988 on compassionate ground. On

becoming ill, she was absent from 18-5-2002 for treatment

when she became fit she came on 6-8-2003 with medical

certificate and filed application for resuming duty on

14-8-2003 but she was not allowed to join the duty, It is

stated that in each calendar year she had worked more

than 240 days but she had been terminated without

any notice and without giving any retrenchment

compensation. It is submitted that the reference be

passed in her favour and she be reinstated on the place.

3. The management also appeared and filed Written

Statement. The case of the management, interalia, is that

the workman was engaged as part time waterwoman in the

year 1988 as casual labour but she was absent from

25-2-2000. The notice was issued to her on 16-3-2001. She

had left the job at her on accord and therefore she is not

entitled to any relief.

4. The following issues are framed for

adjudication :—

I. Whether the action of the management in

terminating the service of Smt. Savitri Bai is

justified ?

II. To what relief she is entitled ?

5. Issue No. I

No evidence is adduced by either of the parties.

This clearly shows that Savitri Bai has failed to establish

the claim as has been sought for. The burden was on the

workman. In absence of any evidence, the issue is decided

in favour of the management.

6. Issue No. II

On the basis of the discussion made above, it is

clear that Smt. Savitri Devi is not entitled to any relief.

Accordingly, the reference is answered.

7. In the result, no dispute award is passed without

any costs.

9. Let the copies of the award be sent to the

Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment

as per rules.

MOHD. SHAKIR HASAN, Presiding Officer

F. 264-8

MSS 391-436

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

1085

ubZ fnYyh] 10 tuojh] 2011

dk-vk- 390.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh; ljdkj lriqjk {ks=kh;

xzkeh.k cSad ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds

chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] toyiqj ds iapkV(lanHkZ la[;k 40@04)

dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 05&01&2011 dks

izkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&12012@292@2003&vkbZvkj(ch&1)º

jes'k flag] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 10th January, 2011

S.O. 390—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby

publishes the award (Ref. No. 40/04) of the Central

Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court , Jabalpur

now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute

between the employers in relation to the management of

Satpura Kshetriya Gramin Bank and their workmen, received

by the Central Government on 05/01/2011.

[No. L-12012/292/2003-IR (B-I)]

RAMESH SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT,

JABALPUR

No. CGIT/LC/R/40/04

Presiding Officer : Shri Mohd. Shakir Hasan

The General Secretary,

K.G.B. Karmchari Union,

Motinagar, Ward No. 24

Balaghat

....Workman/Union

Versus

The Chairman,

Satpura Kshetriya Gramin Bank,

Behind Bus Stand,

Mandla (MP)

.....Management

AWARD

Passed on this 29th day of December, 2010

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour,

vide its Notification No. L-12012/292/2003-IR (B-I) dated

8-4-2004 has referred the following dispute for adjudication

by this tribunal :—

“ Whether the action of the management of the

Chairman, Mandla Balaghat Kshetriya Gramin Bank,

Mandla in not regularizing Shri Ashish Kumar

Kachwaha is legal and justified ? If not, to what

relief the workman is entitled?”

The case of the workman/Union in short is that

the workman was working as messenger-cum-safaiwala

from 28-6-95 to 29-11-03 on daily wages continuously at

Mandla Balaghat Kshetriya Gramin Bank, Mandla. The

Union is said to have raised issue to regularize the daily

wages employees. On failure with the management, the

Union raised industrial dispute before the Asstt. Labour

Commissioner (Central), Shahdol for regularizing him. But

instead of regularizing the daily wagers the management

terminated the service of the workman on 25-11-03. It is

stated that the workman was working as messenger-cum-

safai karamchari regularly for a long time with the

management. It is submitted that the workman be reinstated

and be appointed on permanent post of the said bank and

the account of provident fund be paid.

The management also appeared and filed written

statement. The case of the management, interalia, is that

the alleged workman is not a member of Mandla Balaghat

Kshetriya Gramin Bank. He was never appointed, nor was

undergone any process of selection nor his name was

sponsored by Employment Exchange. There was no

relationship of employer and employee between the

management and the workman. The Industrial Dispute Act,

1947 is not applicable. The workman is said to have been

engaged on daily wages on some occasion on existence of

exigency of work and his service came to an end on

completion of the work. The claim of the workman cannot

be tenable for regularization on his engagement for specific

work and for specific period. He had been paid of his

remuneration of the work done by him. It is submitted that

the workman is not entitled to any relief.

4. On the basis of the pleadings the following issues

are settled for adjudication -

I. Whether the workman was in continuous service

of messenger-cum-safaiwala in the management as

has been cldimed ?

II. Whether the workman is entitled for regularization

in the service of the Bank ?

III. To what relief the workman is entitled ?

5. Issue No. I

The Union/Workman has adduced oral and

documentary evidence in the case. The workman

Shri Ashish Kumar Kushwaha has stated that he was

appointed temporarily and no appointment letter was

issued. He has further stated that he was engaged on daily

wages. This clearly shows that he was not appointed as

messenger-cum -safaiwala rather he was engaged on daily

wages on exigency. He has stated that he had worked

continuously from 28-6-95 to 25-11-03 and for that he has

documents. He has further stated that he has no such proof

nor he has filed any document. His evidence shows that he

has no such proof to prove continuous engagement as

F. 264-8

MSS 391-436

1086

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

daily wages employee. Exhibit W-11 is paper Nos. 10/110

to 10/120. These papers are admitted by the management.

It shows that the workman had received stationeries on

different dates of the Bank. It does not show that he was in

continuous service. Rather it shows that he was engaged

from 1997 to 1999 occassionally. Exhibit W/12 is also Paper

Nos 10/122 to 10/153. These papers are admitted documents.

These papers also show that stationeries were receive by

the workman and had worked till 2002 occassionally. Exhibit

W-10 is a letter of the bank which shows that the workman

was daily wager from 1-4-2000 to 31-3-2001 and the form

was requisitioned for enrollment in the Provident Fund

office. This letter doesnot show that he was continuously

engaged till 25-11-2003. Exhibit W-9 is letter with regard to

the procedure of deduction of provident fund amount of

daily wagers. Thus the documentary evidence adduced by

the workman is not sufficient to prove engagement of the

workman continuously in the service of the management

6. On the other hand, the management has also

examined oral evidence. The management witness

Smt. Anita Dubey has denied that the workman had worked

continuously from 1995 to 25-11-2003 though he had worked

at Mandla Branch of the Bank. She has stated that he had

done part time job and payment was done on weekly basis

or daily basis. Her evidence doesnot corroborate that she

had worked continuously. Thus this is decided in favour

of the management and against the workman.

Issue No. II

It is an admitted fact that the workman is not in the

employment of the bank. Since he is not in the employment

of the Bank, the question of regularization in the service of

the bank doesnot arise. However it is established that he

was engaged on daily wages on exigency of work. the

workman has filed certain documents to show that the

management had a policy to regularize the daily wages

employees. Exhibit W/1 is the circular with regard to the

creation of posts of Messenger in regional Rural Banks.

Exhibit W/2 to W/4 are letters of the Bank. These letters are

with respect to the daily wagers who were engaged prior to

8-10-1984. These letters are not helpful to the workman.

Exhibit W/5 is a letter dated 19-12-2000 of the chairman of

the Bank to Central Office, R.R.B. Cell, Mumbai for seeking

instruction to regularise daily wagers. This letter doesnot

prove that the workman was entitled to be regularized.

Thus the documents filed by the workman doesnot prove

that the workman is entitled to be regularizedd as

messenger-cum-safai karmchari in the Bank . This issue is

accordingly answered.

8. Issue No. III

On the basis of the discussion made above, It is

clear that the workman is not entitled to any relief. The

reference is accordingly answered.

9. In the result, the award is passed without any

order to costs.

10. Let the copies of the award be sent to the

Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment

as per rules.

MOHD. SHAKIR HASAN, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 10 tuojh] 2011

dk-vk- 391.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh; ljdkj Hkkjr lapkj

fuxe fyfeVsM ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa

ds chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa yscj dksVZ lkaxyh

ds iapkV dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 10&1&2011

dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&40012@111@2005&vkbZvkj(Mh;w)º

jes'k flag] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 10th January, 2011

S.O. 391.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award of the Labour

Court , Sangli as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial

Dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited and their

workmen, which was received by the Central Government

on 10/01/2011.

[No. L-40012/111/2005-IR (DU)]

RAMESH SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER LABOUR

COURT AT SANGLI

(Presided over by Shri A. S. Kazi, B. A. LLM)

Ref. (I.D.A.) No. 52/2005

Exh. No.

BETWEEN

The Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd,

Government of India Enterprise,

(Through the Office of the General

Manger), Telecom, Sangli.

...1st Party

AND

(1) Kumar Yakub Madrasi,

R/o. Madrasi Colony, Khanbhag, Sangli.

(2) Rajaram Dattatraya Dalvi,

R/o. Plt. No. 37, Ganesh Park,

Kolhapur Road, Opposite Kusthi

Maidan, Sangli.

(3) Kullaya Shriram Madrasi,

R/o. Madrasi Colony, Khanbhag,

Sangli

....2nd Party

F. 264-8

MSS 391-436

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

1087

Claim :—

In the matter of reinstatement

with continuity of service and

full back wages.

CORAM :— A. S. Kazi, Presiding Officer

APPEARANCES :

Shri S. A. Bhosle, Government Pleader for 1st Party.

Shri K. D. Shinde, Advocate for 2nd Party.

AWARD

(Delivered on 7th July, 2010)

1. The Government of India, Ministry of Labour has

forwarded this reference U/sec. 10(2A) and 10 (1) (d) of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 for adjudication over the

following demand of the 2nd party :

Whether the action of the Management of Bharat

Sanchar Nigam Ltd., Through the Office of General

Manager, Telecom, Sangli, in terminating the services of

Shri Kumar Yakub Madrasi, Rajesh Dattatraya Dalvi and

Kullaya Shriram Madrasi by oral order of termination dated

15-8-2002 is just and legal ? If not, to what relief the workmen

are entitled ?

It may be noted that, in this peculiar case the Hon’ble

Bombay High Court in Writ Petition Nos. 5433/05 to 5435/

05 had directed the Government to make a reference of the

dispute of the petitioners for adjudication.

2. In the statement of claim filed by the three

workmen who are the 2nd party respectively at Exh. U-2,

U-4 and U-6 the 2nd party workmen have contended that,

they were in the employment of the 1st party respectively

as a Casual Employee doing the work of Cleaning,

Sweeping, Sanitary Wares, Wash Basins. The 2nd party at

serial No. 1 namely Kumar Yakub Madrasi claims to have

worked since 1992, similarly 2nd party at Serial No. 2 and

2nd party at Serial No. 3 namely Rajaram Dalvi and Kullaya

Madrasi claimed to have worked respectively since 1995

and 1990. All of them claim to have worked as a ‘‘ Class IV

Employees’’ and that they were illegally terminated by oral

order on 15-8-2002.

All of the workmen who are hereinafter referred

to a 2nd party claim that they were getting wages on

voucher and were doing work of a permanent nature but in

order to deprive them of the Status of Permanent Employee,

the 1st party has shown them as employed on contract

basis. It is further contended that their payment was made

on voucher and their work was Supervised Controlled and

got done by the Subordinates of the 1st party. So, there

was direct relationship of employer and employee. The

2nd party workmen worked very sincerely into the entire

satisfaction of the Superiors and there is no misconduct to

the discredit of the 2nd Party. There is no any memo, show

cause notice or charge-sheet issued in the entire service

tenure.

It is further contended that the 2nd party

workman have completed 240 days of service in each

calendar year. Thus, they have rendered ‘‘Continuous

Service’’ as defined Under Section 25B of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947. It is further contended that, on

14-8-2002 when the 2nd party workmen were on duty, one

Mr. C.G. Jagtap, Section Supervisor orally stated that the

2nd party workmen should not report for duty from

15-08-2002. This order was given at the instance of the 1st

party. In short, it is contended that, no charge-sheet was

issued, no enquiry was conducted and no opportunity of

hearing was given to the 2nd party workmen before their

termination. Similarly, the 2nd party workmen was not given

one months pay or one months notice or retrenchment

compensation and thus there is clear cut violation of Section

25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. It is alleged that,

the 2nd party workmen are terminated in order to recruit

the favourite candidates. No seniority list was published

prior to their retrenchment and the principle of last come,

first go is not oblige.Thus, it is alleged that, the 1st party

has committed the breach of Section 25F and 25G of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. So, the termination of the

2nd party workmen is illegal, unjustified and unwarranted.

Moreover, the 1st party had issued a Circular on

29-9-2000 for Regularisation of the Service of the workers

working in the Category of the 2nd party. The 2nd party

insisted to give them the benefit of the Circular dated

29-9-2000 which resulted in their illegal termination. By virtue

of said Circular, the 2nd party workmen were deemed to

have been regularised. Their termination therefore under

such circumstances is contended to be illegal on the face

of the record. Hence, it is prayed that the reference be

allowed with costs.

The 1st party filed its Written Statement

respectively at Exh. C-3, C-4 and C-5 to the claims of the

2nd party workmen. All the contents of the claim application

are denied in toto. It is contended that the work was given

to the 2nd party workmen purely on a temporary and

contract basis. It is contended that, the 1st party B.S.N.L.

is working under the Central Government (DOT) and hence

this Court has no jurisdiction to entertain the reference. It

is specifically denied that the 2nd party workmen were

employed as ‘‘Sweepers’’ on a permanent post. It is also

denied that the 2nd party workmen have rendered

‘‘Continuous Service’’ of 240 days in a year. It is further

contended that, there was no recuritment in the

organisation and hence no question arises of following

any seniority list. Therefore, there is no question of

violation of Section 25F and 25G of the Industrial Disputes

Act, 1947. It is further contended that, as the work was

given on contract basis, there is automatically termination

of contract of work on completion of the work within the

F. 264-8

MSS 391-436

1088

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

meaning of Section 2 (oo) (bb) of the Industrial Disputes

Act, 1947. It is further contended that the Circular issued

on 29-09-2000 is not applicable to the 2nd party because

the said Circular applies to regularisation of Casual

Workers and 2nd party was never working even as ‘‘Casual

Labourers’’. It is further contended that, the claim is not

filed within limitation. Hence, it is prayed that the reference

be dismissed with costs.

According to the rival pleadings of both parties

my learned predecessor framed the following issues below

Exh. O-4 those issues arise for determinant on before me

and I record my findings thereon for the reasons

enumerated hereinafter:

Issues

Findings

1. Does the 2nd party prove

In the affirmative.

that the 1st party illegally

terminated their services by

an oral order ?

2. To what relief, the 2nd party

As per final order.

is entitled ?

3. What order ?

As per final order.

REASONS

As to Issues No. 1 to 2 :—

Both these issues being interlinked are answered by

me together for the sake of convenience.

The 2nd party workmen filed their affidavits of

examination-in-chief respectively at Exh. U-8, U-9 and

U-10 and closed their evidence by filing the pursis at Exh.

U-12. The 1st party filed the pursis at Exh. C-13 that it does

not want to lead any oral evidence in the matter.

The first objection raised during the course of

the arguments by the 1st party is that, this Court has no

jurisdiction to entertain the present reference because

according to the Learned Counsel for the 1st party the

B.S.N.L. Ltd., is nothing but the Central Government. To

support his submission he has placed reliance upon a

ruling in the case of Bombay Telephone Canteen Employees

Association V/s. M.T.N.L. Bombay and Others, reported

in 1989 Mh. L.J. page No. 6 wherein the Hon’ble Division

Bench of the Bombay High Court held :

‘‘The Manager Telephone Nigam Ltd., Bombay is

nothing but the Central Government not

withstanding its incorporation as a separate company.

Consequently, the Maharashtra recognition of Trade

Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practice

Act has no applicability to a dispute between the

Nigam and its employees. No complaint against the

Nigam under the Act therefore is tenable’’.

For the same proposition reliance was placed by

the 1st party on the authority in the case of I.I.T. Bombay

V/s. Shahabuddin Usman Raut and Others, reported in 1997

VI. L.J. Page No. 439.

10.

Per contra, Learned Counsel for the 2nd party

Shri. K.D. Shinde, submitted that in the present case firstly

the reference has been made by the Central Government

as per the directions of the Hon’ble Bombay High Court in

Writ Petitions Nos. 5433/05 to 5435/05. Therefore, he

submitted that, the reference has been made not by the

‘‘State Government’’ but by the ‘‘Central Government’’.

Moreover, he submitted that the Telecom Department of

Union of India is engaged in commercial activity and is not

discharging any sovereign functions of the State and

therefore it is an ‘‘Industry’’ and so the reference is

maintainable under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. In

support of his submissions he relied upon the authority in

the case of General Manager, Telecom V/s. S. Shrinivasa

Rao and Others, reported in 1998 LAB I.C. Page No. 883, in

which the Hon’ble Apex Court was pleased to hold that

the Telecom Department was an ‘‘Industry’’.

11.

On hearing both the sides at length and after

going through the above case law relied on both the sides,

I find with due respect that the view taken by the Division

Bench of the Hon’ble Bombay High Court in Bombay

Telephone Canteen Employees Association Case cited at

Supra reported in 1989 Mh. L.J. Page No. 3 has been

expressly overruled by the Hon’ble Apex Court in 1998

LAB. I.C. Page No. 883. Therefore, there is no merit in the

submissions made on behalf of the 1st party that this

Court has no jurisdiction to entertain the present reference.

12.

It is the contention of the 2nd party workmen

that, they were Casual Workers on Class IV Posts and that

while terminating them the provision of Section 25F and

25G were not followed by the 1st party. As against this it is

contention of the 1st party that the 2nd party workmen

were working only as ‘‘Contractual Labourers’’ and there

was no relationship of employer and employee between

the 2nd party and 1st party. The various suggestions put

by the 1st party to the 2nd party workmen in cross-

examination on this point are denied by the 2nd party

workmen. It is pertinent to note here that the 2nd party

workmen moved an application at Exh. U-7 with a prayer

that 1st party may be directed to produce the Muster Rolls

of 2nd party workmen for their service tenure and also the

Circular dated 29-9-2000 for regularisation of Casual

Workers. However, the 1st party has only produced the

vouchers of payment made to the 2nd party workmen from

March 2001 to August 2002.

On perusal of the evidence on record, it appears that

all the 2nd party workmen were paid the wages by vouchers

directly by the 1st party. It also appears that the all worked

for a period of more than 240 days continuously because

those vouchers are of continuous payment to them since

March 2001 to August 2002.

F. 264-8

MSS 391-436

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

1089

13.

Now, in support of their contention that the

2nd party workmen are merely ‘‘Contractual Labourers’’

the 1st party has not led any oral evidence nor produced

any other documents. Their contention is that on the

payment vouchers the 2nd party workmen were described

as ‘‘Contractual Labourers’’ and therefore they may be held

to be so . But, no positive evidence is brought on record.

Even the Muster Rolls are not produced by the 1st party

nor they have produced the Circular dated 29-9-2000. So,

there is nothing to rebut the contention of the 2nd party

workmen that the 1st party employed them directly with-

out any Middle Man and that for reasons best known to

them the 1st party had deliberately shown them to the

working on Contract Basis. No evidence is also led by the

1st party to show that work is not available with them

presently. Moreover, admittedly no seniority list was

published before retrenching them nor any notice was

given to them. Even no compensation was paid to them as

required by law. It has to be remembered that the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 is a welfare legislation keeping in mind

the object that the fight between the Management and the

Workmen is an unequal fight and so in the absence of

positive evidence that the 2nd party workmen were mere

‘‘Contractual Labourers’’, merely on the basis of the

1st party referring them by said designation cannot make

them so.

14.

Learned Counsel for the 2nd party submitted

that seniority list has to be published to ensure due

compliance of Section 25G of the Industrial Disputes Act,

1947. I agree with him because this is the mandatory

requirement of Rule 81 of the Industrial Disputes

(Bombay) Rules, 1957. Therefore there appears to be non

compliance of Section 25F and 25G of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 by the 1st party. In the result I answer

issue No. 1 in the affirmative and proceed to pass the

following order.

ORDER

The reference is hereby partly allowed.

The 2nd party workmen namely Kumar Yakub

Madrasi, Rajaram Dattatraya Dalvi and Kullaya

Shriram Madrasi are hereby directed to be re-instated

with continuity of service and without back wages

w.e.f. 15-8-2002 within a period of two months from

today with regular wages consequent to continuity

of service.

No order as to costs.

Five copies of this award be send to the Desk

Officer, Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New

Delhi for publication and necessary action.

Sangli.

Date :- 7-07-2010.

A. S. KAZI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 10 tuojh] 2011

dk-vk- 392.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh; ljdkj nwj lapkj

foHkkx ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds

chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k

lhthvkbZVh@,ylh@vkj@17@2001) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh;

ljdkj dks 10&01&2011 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&40012@380@2000&vkbZvkj(Mh;w)º

jes'k ¯lg] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 10th January, 2011

S.O. 392.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGIT/

LC/R/17/2001) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in

the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation

to the management of Department of Telecom and their

workmen, which was received by the Central Government

on 10-1-2011.

[No. L-40012/380/2000-IR (DU)]

RAMESH SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT,

JABALPUR

No. CGIT/LC/R/17/2001

PRESIDING OFFICER: SHRI MOHD. SHAKIR HASAN

Shri Om Prakash S/o Hari Shankar,

R/o CTO Compound, Qtr. No. 7,

Type- II, Near High Court,

Jabalpur

...Workman/Union

Versus

The General Manager,

Telecom Department,

Jabalpur

...Management

A WARD

Passed on this 24th day of December, 2010

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour,

vide its Notification No. L-40012/380/2000-IR (DU) dated

17-11-2000 has referred the following dispute for

adjudication by this tribunal :—

“Whether the action of the management of General

Manager, Telecom Deptt. in terminating the services

F. 264-8

MSS 391-436

1090

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

of Shri Om Prakash S/o Shri Hari Shankar w.e.f.

2-11-95 instead of regularizing him is legal and justified?

If not, to what relief is the workman entitled ?”

2. The case of the workman in short is that he was

appointed as Safaiwala on 1-11-90 and worked till 1-11-95

continuously for five years. He obtained the temporary

status and he was terminated arbitrarily on 2-11-95 without

any show cause and without giving any opportunity. His

termination is illegal and unconstitutional. It is submitted

that the workman be reinstated with all consequential

benefits.

3. The management appeared and filed Written

Statement in the reference. The case of the management,

interalia, is that the management never worked with the

management. He has not disclosed that in which place he

was working and how he was appointed as daily wager.

He had never rendered continuous service of 240 days in

any calendar year. Under the circumstances, the reference

be answered in favour of the management.

4. On the basis of the pleadings of both the parties,

the following issues are framed for decision—

I. Whether the action of the management in

terminating the service of the workman w.e.f.

2-11-95 is legal and justified ?

II. To what relief the workman is entitled?

5. Issue No.1

According to the workman, he was appointed as

safaiwala on 1-11-90 and worked continuously till

1-11-95 when he was terminated from service. To prove

the case, the workman has adduced oral and documentary

evidence. The workman Shri Om Prakash has initially

supported his case. He has stated that he did not get any

appointment letter. He received wages in a month on the

basis of work done by him. He has denied that he worked

less than 240 days in every calendar year. The documents

filed by the workman give different picture. Exhibit W-I is

the statement certified by the authority and is admitted by

the management. This shows that he worked till Jan. 1994

as Casual Labour whereas the case is that he worked till

October 1995. Exhibit W/3 and W/4 are the payment

receipts. These receipts are of March 93, April 93, Nov.

93, Jan. 94, Feb. 94 and of 20-7-96 and 21-7-96. These

receipts do not establish that he worked continuously till

1-11-95 rather it shows that he worked as casual worker on

exigency even two days in 1996. His case is inconsistent

with the documents. Exhibit W/4 to W/11 are attendance

sheets but these are illegible and it is not showing that it is

of relevant period. These attendance sheets are not helpful

to the workman. Exhibit W/12 is Caste Certificate and

Exhibit W/13 is domicile Certificate. Thus the documents

filed by the workman do not prove that the workman was

in continuous service till 2-11-95 as has been provided

under Section 25-B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The workman during a period of twelve calendar months

preceding the date 2-11-95 with reference was not in

employment for 240 days or more of the management. It is

clear that the provision of Section 25 F of the I.D. Act,

1947 is not attracted. It is evident that the action of the

management is justified.

6. On the other hand, the management has also

adduced oral avidence. The management witness Shri

Jauhari Lal is Divisional Engineer. He has stated that he

has never been engaged 240 days in a calendar year. His

evidence does substantiate that he worked 240 days or

more preceding the date with reference. Thus this issue is

decided in favour of the management an against the

workman.

7. Issue No. II

On the basis of the discussion made above, it is

clear that the workman is not entitled to any relief.

Accordingly the reference is answered.

8. In the result, the award is passed without any

order to costs.

9. Let the copies of the award be sent to the

Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment

as per rules.

MOHD. SHAKIR HASAN, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 11 tuojh] 2011

dk-vk- 393.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh; ljdkj ch-lh-lh-,y-

ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vlulksy ds iapkV (dEiysaV la[;k

03@2002] ,siyhds'ku la[;k 1@2004 vkSj dEiysaV la[;k 01@2004)

dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 11&01&2011 dks

izkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&22013@1@2011&vkbZvkj(lh&II)º

Mh- ,l- ,l- Jhfuokl jko] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 11th January, 2011

S.O. 393.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award of the Central

Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Asansol

(filed under Section 33-A in the matter of Complaint No. 03/

2002, Application 1/2004 & Complaint No. 1/2004) as shown

in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the

employers in relation to the management of B.C.C.L. and

their workmen, which was received by the Central

Government on 11-1-2011.

[No. L-22013/1/2011-IR (C-II)]

D. S. S. SRINIVASA RAO, Desk Officer

F. 264-8

MSS 391-436

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

1091

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

ASANSOL

COMPLAINT No. 3 of 2002

Balmukund Sharma

.... Complainant

Vrs.

Agent. Dahibari Colliery, Mugma, Dhanbad & others

.... Opp. Party

APPLICATION 1 OF 2004

B.C.C.L.

...Applicant

Balmukund Sharma

.... Opp. Party.

COMPLAINT NO. 1 OF 2004

Balmukund Sharma

.... Complainant

B.C.C.L.

..Opp. Party.

This is a common order in all the three cases arising

out of the Ref. 44/99 and have been taken up simultaneously

for disposal as the subject matters in all the cases are

inextricably connected with each other and parties are same.

The applicant Balmukund Sharma (hereinafter

referred as workman) who was initially appointed as under

ground loader and joined in service on 24-10-1990 was re-

designated as Fitter Apprentice w.e.f. 10-09-1991. He was

transferred to different places in that capacity. His last

posting was in Victoria West Colliery where he worked on

03-06-1999 after which he was allegedly stopped from duty.

The I.D. has been raised on various grounds and for alleged

denial of his rightful claims for promotion to the category-

IV as Fitter and consequent upon failure conciliation by

lawful authority. Reference has been made to this Tribunal

for adjudication by the Central Government U/s 10 of the

I.D. Act 1947 ( Act in short) for adjudication which is

pending since 7-6-1999.

During pendency of the Reference Complaint

U/s 33 A of the act has been filed by the workman alleging

that the transfer order of the Management dated 12-9-2002

transfering him from Dahibari Colliery to Basanti Mata

Colliery and subsequent release order is violative of the

provisions contained in Section 33(1) of the Act. The

complaint has been registered as Complaint 3/2002. The

Management contested the same by filing written objection.

The management has maintained that the said transfer of

the workman is due to closure of the Mine and also

consequent upon the settlement reached between the

parties on termination of disciplinary proceeding after

service of a charge sheets and domestic enquiries. However,

his transfer from Dahibari Colliery w.e.f. 15-9-2002 which is

the subject matter of this case, according to the

management as per their written objection, is closure of

the mines.

The management has filed the application U/s

33A of the Act on 19-6-2004 (which has been registered as

application No. 1 of 2004) in which the management has

sought for aproval of their action in dismissing the workman

(OP) from service pending adjudication of the Reference

No. 44/1999 by holding that the action is independent of

and not connected to the reference . The allegation as per

their averment (in short) is that the workman was charge

sheeted vide CS No. 02 : 2091 dated 7-12-2002 for the alleged

willful absecne from duty without sufficient cause and

disobedience of lawful order of the higher authority by

the workman.The workman did not submit any satisfactory

reply. The charge of misconduct was duly established in

the domestic enquiry and as such the workman was

dismissed from service after being served with 2nd show-

cause and on being paid one month salary as per Section

33 (2)(b) of the Act.

4. The workman in reply to the allegation maintains

that the domestic enquiry was held despite his protest that

he will not get justice from the Enquiry Officer namely

Sri S. K. Ghosh working under the direct control of the

authority who charge sheeted him and that the Agent is not

the competent authority from inflicting major punishment .

The workman asserts that prior approval of this court has

not been obtained for the order of dismissal dated 16-01-

2004 and permission of the Court has been sought on the

same day. Challenging the action of the Management on

various other grounds as illegal he maintained that it is

connected with the Reference No. 44/1999. The workman

has urged for setting aside the dismissal order and prayed

for consequential benefits w.e.f. 16-01-2004.

Complaint No. 1/2004 has been registered on

23-04-2004 U/s 33(A) of the I. D. Act. filed by the workman

Balmukund Sharma with a prayer to set aside the dismissal

order issued against him by the Agent. Dahibari Colliery

not being lawfully competent to awarded major

punishment. The facts in the pleading of Application

1/2004 of the workman have been reiterated.

The Management in their written objection

reiterating the facts of their pleadings of Application No. 1

further maintains that the Agent of Dahibari Colliery is

lawfully competent to impose major punishment and that

he has not acted beyond his jurisdiction in passing

dismissal order against the workman. The Management

further maintains that the workman has been rightly

dismissed by authority for his act of misconduct and further

that the fairness of enquiry is a subject matter of the

proceeding in the Reference by the Court. The action of

the Management is not in contravention of the provision

of Section 33(A)(1) of the Act and hence the Management

urged for the dismissal of the complaint.

F. 264-8

MSS 391-436

1092

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

I have heard the workman Sri S. K. Pandey, the

authorized representative of the workman (whenever they

appeared) and the authorized Representative of the

Management in all the three proceedings . All of them

remained in conformity for hearing of the matter of all the

three cases together and their disposal by a common order

for their convenience and for proper appreciation and

effective adjudication. Also it became conducive to

determine the questions involved as the facts are

inextricably connected and parties are same. Above all it

does not prejudice either of the parties.

Needless to mention that the reference has been

made for an award on the dispute‘‘as to whether the action

of victoria west Colliery in denying regularization of Shri

Balmukund Sharma, Apprentice Fitter is justified ? If not,

to what relief is the workman entitled ?’’ The reference has

been registered in this Court on 7-6-1999. It is obvious that

conciliation proceeding started much early that Section 33

of the Act prohibits any alteration of condition of service

to the prejudice to the workman applicable to the parties

i.e. Employer and the employee immediately before the

commencement of the proceeding and also prohibits

discharge or punishment by dismissal or otherwise for any

misconduct connected with dispute save with the express

permission in writing of the authority i.e. The Court in this

case as the proceeding is pending here. The legal position

is that the ordinary right to alter the terms of the Employee’s

service to their prejudice or to terminate their service under

the gerneral law governing the contract of employment

has been banned subject to certain conditions. The

Employer’s has the liberty to take action during pendenlite

period if it is not punitive or malafide or does not amount to

victimization or unfair labour practice consistently with

the preservation of the Employees bonafide right to

maintain discipline and efficiency in the industry for

securing maximum production in a peaceful and

harrnonious atmosphere. At any rate in regard to actiion

covered by Section 33(1) and Sectiion 33(3) of the Act

previous permission from the Court has to be obtained by

the Employer while in regard to action falling U/s 33(2) the

Employer may obtain subsequent approval subject to

certain conditions. So the pivotal question now is to find

out whether the action of the Management is with regard

to the matter connected or not with the I.D. pending in this

Court since 7-6-1999 and whether it is a case of victimizatiion

and stems from unfair labour practice as the action of

dismissal is undoubtedly a punitive action.

The date chart below can be seen for better

apreciation the matter.

Date

Description

24-10-90

Appointment of the workman as U.G..

Loader at Basanti Mata Colliery.

11-9-91

Designation changed to Fitter

Apprentice Category 1

23-3-93

Transferred to Area Workshop

5-95

Transferred to Victoria West Colliery

3-1-96

Authorised to work as Lamp Issue

Clerk.

3-6-99

Last date of work as L.I.C and duty

stopped there after

7. 7-7-97-16-6-98 Conciliation pending on 1.D. raised by

workman.

24-6-98

Failure of conciliation reported by

A.L.C

7-6-99

Date of commencement of 1.D. case

Ref. 44/99

10. 16-1-2001

Workman was allowed to join at

Dahibari Colliery (4-6-1999 to

15-1-2001 period of absence)

11. 16-9-2002

Transferred to Basanti Mata Colliery

12. 7-10-2002

Filing of complaint No. 3/2002 by

workman against the transfer

13. 7-12-2002

Charge Sheeted for alleged willful

absence w.e.f. 16-9-02

14. 3-2-2003

Domestic Enquiry

15. 16-1-2004

Dismissal of the workman

16. 19-1-2004

Application by the Management vide

Application No.1/04 for approval

17. 23-4-2004

Complain by workman to set aside

dismissal order 16-1-2004.

The date chart above shows that after the raising

of the dispute the conciliation remained pending in the

labour commissionarate for the period 7-7-1997 to

16-6-1998 and the reference in this Court since 7-6-1999.

The Mangement is quite aware of pending of the dispute

and commencement of the I. D. in this Court. As a

belevolent Employer they are expected to handle the matter

lawfully with care & caution. Regularisation of service of

the workman in Apprentice Fitter is the moot question in

the reference and as such the allegation like denial of wages

in the clerical Grade (L.I.C.) is hence a matter of the reference

too. That being so the matter relating to transfer and alleged

coercion to the workman by the management to work under

ground can not be considered as unconnected with the

reference as it has not been done earlier. The workman

persistently alleged that he was being intentionally

transferred and was forced to work under ground as the

management was not pleased with him as he (workman)

took shelter of the Court against the whishes of the

management. As against the assertion of the workman

that he (workman) has never resisted his transfer earlier to

Victoria and that he resisted only when he was victimized

and was intentionally transferred to B. M Colliery and that

to work underground the management has no satisfactory

reply. The management simply maintains that the transfer

was effected for closure of the Mines and alongwith the

workman some others numbering 147 were transferred. It

F. 264-8

MSS 391-436

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

1093

is also true at the same time that some staff were retained

as maintenance staff as submitted by Sri S.K. Pandey

arguing on behalf of the workman. It stands to no reason

as to why the workman was not retained back in view of

the legal embargo in the matter pending in Court. It

becomes, thus, glaring that the workman’s transfer to B.

Mata Colliery to work underground was not usual but

was an intentional act of victimisation by flouting the legal

provision. There has been no convincing grounds to

believe that the management was constrained to transfer

the workman and forced him to perform a difficult nature

of work after commencement of the industrial dispute U/s

33A of the Act in the Court and in that respect before the

labour commissionarate and consequently the dismissal

of the workman for his alleged absence from duties which

stems from this illegal act of the management is bound he

considered as improper and illegal. Such an act of the

management in general and the decision making personnel

of the BCCL in particular on the other hand take them very

near to the boarder line of contempt. It is expedient for

them now to correct the wrongs caused to the workman

by adequeately compensating him besides his

reinstatement with full back wages immediately. In fine,

the application of the management(Application no. 1/2004)

for post facto approval of their action of dismissal of the

workman from service w.e.f. 16-1-2004 being not

sustainable under law is dismissed. The workman be

reinstated with full back wages and consequentical benefit.

The complain No. 1/2004 being squarely and fully covered

by the above order is disposed of accordingly in favour of

the workman. The subject matter of complaint No. 3/2002

too though come under the perview of the Section 33A

I.D. Act the action of the management being violative of

the provision on the same grounds as discussed above

and the relief sought by the workman being adequately

met by the above order (in Application No. 1/2004 and

Complaint 1/2004) no separate order on relief is passed

and same is disposed of accordingly.

Sd./-Illegible

Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 11 tuojh] 2011

dk-vk- 394-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh; ljdkj xkSj xzkeh.k

cSad ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/

dj.k @Je U;k;ky;] dksydkrk ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 02@2006)

dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 10&1&2011 dks izkIr

gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y&12011@17@2005&vkbZvkj(ch&I)º

jes'k flag] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 11th January, 2011

S.O. 394.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No 02/2006)

of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court , Kolkata as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial

Dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of Gaur Gramin Bank and their workman,

received by the Central Government on 10-1-2011.

[No. L-12011/17/2005-IR (B-I)]

RAMESH SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL

AT KOLKATA

Reference No. 02 of 2006

Parties : Employers in relation to the Management of

Gaur Gramin Bank

And

Their Workmen

Present : Mr. Justice Manik Mohan Sarkar, Presiding

Officer

Appearances :

On behalf of the Management :

None

On behalf of the Workmen :

None

State: West Bengal.

Industry : Banking.

Dated : 27th December, 2010

AWARD

By Order. No. L-12011/17/2005-IR (B-I) dated

9-01-2006 the Government of India, Ministry of Labour in

exercise of its powers under Section 10 (1) (d) and (2A)of

the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 referred the following

dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :

“ Whether the action of the management of Gaur

Gramin Bank, Malda by not fixing the basic pay of

Sri Baidyanath Basak to the next higher grade than

Sri Arunava Choudhury is justified & legal ? If not,

to what relief the concerned workman is entitled ?”

When the matter is called today, none appears

for either of the parties. It is evident that either of the parties

made no apearance for a pretty long time. In the order

dated 22-9-2010 it is found that two aplications dated

1-1-2009 and 7-9-2010 are pending in the record for disposal

but those applications could not be disposed of since the

pending in the record for disposal but those aplications

could not be disposed of since the parties did not apear,

specially the workmen union from which side those

applications were filed.

F. 264-8

MSS 391-436

1094

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Perused the contents of the said two

applications filed by the workmen and it is found that in

the application dated 1-1-2009 which was filed on

16-01-2009, the workmen union made a prayer before this

Tribunal for withdrawal of the present reference for some

reasons stated therein, but unfortunately the said

application was not disposed of. Secondly, and other

application was received by this Tribunal on 05-08-2010

and in the said application to the prayer was made from the

side of the workmen union for withdrawal of the present

reference again and in the said application, the earlier

application dated 01-01-2009 received by the Tribunal on

16-01-2009 has been referred.

The absence of the parties is perhaps for the

said prayer from the side of the workmen union for

withdrawal of the present reference. Since the present

reference has been received from the Government of India,

Ministry of Labour & Employment, permission for

withdrawal cannot be given to the workmen union though

at its instance the present reference has been made.

However, the present reference can be treated as disposed

of for non-prosecution.

In such circumstances, basing upon the prayers

made in the applications received on 16-1-2009 and

5-8-2010 it is presumed that no industrial disputed is

existing at present since the workmen union does not want

to pursue the present reference and so the present

reference is treated as disposed of on non-prosecution,

An Award is passed accordingly.

Dated, Kolkata,

27th December, 2010

JUSTICE MANIK MOHAN SARKAR, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 12 tuojh] 2011

dk-vk- 395-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh; ljdkj LVsV cSad

chdkusj vkSj t;iqj ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds

deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k] t;iqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 17@09)

dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 11&1&2011 dks izkIr

gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y&12012@145@2008&vkbZvkj(ch&I)º

jes'k ¯lg] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 12th January, 2011

S.O. 395.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No 17/09)

of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court , Jaipur now as shown in the Annexure in the

Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to

the management of State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur and

their workmen, which was received by the Central

Government on 11-1-2011.

[No. L-12012/145/2008-IR (B-I)]

RAMESH SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL

TRIBUNAL -CUM-LABOUR COURT, JAIPUR

PRESENT : Shri N. K. Purohit, Presiding Officer

I. D. No. 17 /09

Reference No. L-12012/145/2008-IR (B-I)

dated : 31-3-2009

General Secretary

Rajasthan Pradesh Bank workers Organization

C-13, Ojhaji Ka Bagh

Gandhi Nagar Mod, Jaipur.

V/s

Managing Director

State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur

Head Office, Tilak Marg

C-Scheme, Jaipur

AWARD

Dated : 29-12-2010

The Central Government in exercise of the powers

conferred under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and 2(A) of

Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 has referred

the following industrial dispute to thisTribunal for

adjudication which runs as under :—

“ Whether the action of the management of State

Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur, Jaipur though Managing

Director in denying the payment of interest of late

payment of annual increment to Sri Dharam Sing

Mankad from 1990 to 1995 in violation of bank circular

dated 3-2-1999 bearing No. Pers/102/98-99, is just

and fair? If not, what relief the workman concerned

is entitled to and from which date ?”

Pursuant to the receipt of reference order, the

registered notices were issued to both the parties. On

perusal of the proceedings , it appears that representative

on behalf of the non-applicant appeared on 7-4-10 &

representative on behalf of the union Shri R.C.Jain appeared

on 14-6-10 who sought time for filing claim statement but

on subsequent date i.e. 10-8-10 none appeared on behalf

of the applicant union therefore, order for ex-party

proceedings were drawn against him. On next date i.e.

5-10-10 Shri R.C. Jain appeared on behalf of the union &

moved an aplication to recall the order dated 10-8-10

F. 264-8

MSS 391-436

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

1095

whereby ex-party proceedings were drawn against the

union. The case was posted for filing reply & argument on

said application on 6-12-10 but on the said date none

appeared on behalf of the union, therefore, the application

dated 5-10-10 to recall the order dated 10-8-10 was

rejected.

The learned representative on behalf of the non-

applicant submitted that since no claim statement has been

filed, therefore, non-applicant did not want to submit any

statement. Therefore, case was posted for arguments on

21-12-10.

The representative on behalf of the union did

not appeared on 21-12-10 also. It is pertinent to mention

that even Shri R. C. Jain who appeared on behalf of the

union on earlier dates did not file any authority letter to

represent the workman.The learned representative for the

non-applicant submitted that in another CGIT case 19/09

which is pertaining to same workman the fact regarding

death of the workman has been brought on the record.

The claim statement has not been filed & there is

no material on record on the basis of which the reference

under adjudication can be decided on merits. Therefore,

‘‘No Claim Award’’ is passed in this matter. The reference

under adjudication is answered accordingly.

Award as above.

N. K. PUROHIT, Presiding Officer

vkns'k

ubZ fnYyh] 21 tuojh] 2011

dk-vk- 396-µtcfd dsUnzh; ljdkj dh ;g jk; Fkh fd

Hkkjrh; LVsV cSad ds izca/u vkSj muds dkexkjksa ds chp vkS|ksfxd

fookn fo|eku Fkk _

vkSj tcfd dsUnzh; ljdkj dh ;g jk; Fkh fd mijksDr

fookn esa jk"Vªh; egRo dk iz'u gS _

vkSj tcfd dsUnzh; ljdkj dh jk; Fkh fd mi;ZqDr fookn

dk U;k;&fu.kZ;u fdlh jk"Vªh; U;k;kf/dj.k }kjk fd;k tkuk

pkfg, _

vkSj tcfd vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk

14) dh /kjk 7 [k }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;kas dk iz;ksx djrs gq, dsUnzh;

ljdkj us Je vkSj jktxkj ea=kky; ds fnukad 7&11&94 ds

lela[;d vkns'k ds rgr ,d jk"Vªh; vkS|ksfxd U;k;kf/dj.k dk

xBu fd;k] ftldk eq[;ky; eqEcbZ esa j[kk x;k gS vkSj blds

ihBklhu vf/dkjh ds :i esa U;k;ew£r Jh vkj- th- fala/kdj dks

fu;qDr fd;k vkSj mijksDr vf/fu;e dh /kjk 10 dh mi&/kjk

(1d) }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;kas dk iz;ksx djrs gq, mijksDr vkS|ksfxd

fookn dks U;k;&fu.kZ;u ds fy, mijksDr jk"Vªh; vkS|ksfxd

U;k;kf/dj.k ds ikl izsf"kr fd;k _

vkSj tcfd Jh vkj- th- fla/kdj dk dk;Zdky 11&5&1995

dks lekIr gks x;k _

vkSj tc ,d jk"Vªh; vkS|ksfxd U;k;kf/dj.k dk xBu fd;k

x;k Fkk ftldk eq[;ky; eqEcbZ esa Fkk rFkk ftlds ihBklhu

vf/dkjh U;k;ew£r Jh vkj- ,l- oekZ Fks vkSj mijksDr fookn dks

bl funs'k ds lkFk U;k;fu.kZ;u ds fy, mijksDr vkS|ksfxd

U;k;kf/dj.k ds ikl izsf"kr fd;k x;k Fkk fd og ml pj.k ls

U;kf;d dkjZokbZ 'kq: djsaxs tgka ij U;k;ewfrZ Jh vkj- th- fla/kdj

}kjk mls NksM+k x;k Fkk A

vkSj tcfd U;k;ewfrZ Jh vkj- ,l- oekZ dk dk;Zdky

7&1&1998 dks lekIr gks x;k _

vkSj tcfd ,d jk"Vªh; vkS|ksfxd U;k;kf/dj.k dk xBu

fd;k x;k Fkk ftldk eq[;ky; eqEcbZ esa Fkk] ftlds ihBklhu

vf/dkjh U;k;ew£r Jh lh- ch- xkso/Zu Fks vkSj mijksDr fookn dks

bl funs'k ds lkFk U;k;fu.kZ;u ds fy, mijksDr jk"Vªh; vkS|ksfxd

U;k;kf/dj.k ds ikl izsf"kr fd;k x;k Fkk fd og ml pj.k ls

U;kf;d dkjZokbZ 'kq: djsaxs tgka ij U;k;ewfrZ Jh vkj- ,l- oekZ

}kjk mls NksM+k x;k Fkk A

vkSj tcfd U;k;ewfrZ Jh lh-ch- xkso/Zu dk dk;Zdky

08&01&2000 dks lekIr gks x;k A

vkSj tcfd ,d jk"Vªh; vkS|ksfxd U;k;kf/dj.k dk xBu

fd;k x;k Fkk ftldk eq[;ky; eqEcbZ esa Fkk] ftlds ihBklhu

vf/dkjh U;k;ew£r Jh ,l- lh- ik.Ms; Fks vkSj mijksDr fookn dks

bl funs'k ds lkFk U;k;fu.kZ;u ds fy, mijksDr jk"Vªh; vkS|ksfxd

U;k;kf/dj.k ds ikl izsf"kr fd;k x;k Fkk fd og ml pj.k ls

U;kf;d dkjZokbZ 'kq: djsaxs tgka ij U;k;ewfrZ Jh lh- ch- xkso/Zu

}kjk mls NksM+k x;k FkkA

vkSj tcfd Jh ,l- lh- ikaMs; dk dk;Zdky 08&09&2004

dks lekIr gks x;k A

vkSj tcfd ,d jk"Vªh; vkS|ksfxd U;k;kf/dj.k dk xBu

fd;k x;k Fkk ftldk eq[;ky; eqEcbZ esa Fkk rFkk ftlds ihBklhu

vf/dkjh U;k;ew£r Jh ?ku';ke nkl Fks vkSj mijksDr fookn dks bl

funs'k ds lkFk U;k;fu.kZ;u ds fy, mijksDr jk"Vªh; vkS|ksfxd

U;k;kf/dj.k ds ikl izsf"kr fd;k x;k Fkk fd U;k;ew£r Jh ?ku';ke

nkl ml pj.k ls U;kf;d dkjZokbZ 'kq: djsaxs tgka ij U;k;ewfrZ

Jh ,l- lh- ikaMs; }kjk mls NksM+k x;k FkkA

vkSj tcfd U;k;ewfrZ Jh ?ku';ke nkl us 06&02&2006 dks

mDr jk"Vªh; U;k;kf/dj.k dk dk;ZHkkj NksM+ fn;k A

blfy, vc ,d jk"Vªh; vkS|ksfxd U;k;kf/dj.k dk xBu

fd;k tkrk gS ftldk eq[;ky; eqEcbZ esa Fkk rFkk ftlds ihBklhu

vf/dkjh U;k;ew£r Jh xkSjh 'kadj ljkZiQ gksaxs vkSj mijksDr fookn

F. 264-8

MSS 391-436

1096

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 5, 2011/MAGHA 16, 1932

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

dks bl funs'k ds lkFk U;k;fu.kZ;u ds fy, mijksDr jk"Vªh; vkS|ksfxd

U;k;kf/dj.k ds ikl izsf"kr fd;k tkrk gS fd U;k;ew£r xkSjh 'kadj

ljkZiQ ml fLFkfr ls U;kf;d dkjZokbZ 'kq: djsaxs tgka ij U;k;ewfrZ

Jh ?ku';ke nkl }kjk mls NksM+k x;k FkkA

¹la- ,y&12011@15@1994&vkbZ vkj(ch&I)º

jes'k flag] MsLd vf/dkjh

ORDER

New Delhi, the 21st January, 2011

S.O. 396.— Whereas the Central Government was

of the opinion that an Industrial Dispute existed between

the management of State Bank of India and their

workmen ;

And whereas the Central Government was of the

opinion that the above dispute involved a question of

national importance ;

And whereas the Central Government was of the

opinion that the above dispute should be adjudicated by a

National Tribunal ;

And whereas the Central Government in exercise of

the powers conferred by Section 7B of the I.D. Act, 1947

(14 of 1947), constituted a National Industrial Tribunal

vide Ministry of Labour’s Order of even number dated

07-11-1994 with headquarters at Mumbai and appointed

Justice Shri R. G. Sindhakar as its Presiding Officer and in

exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1A) of

Sectiion 10 of the said Act, referred the said Industrial

Dispute to the said National Industrial Tribunal for

adjudication :

And whereas the term of Shri R. G. Sindhakar expired

on 11-05-1995 ;

And whereas, a National Industrial Tribunal was

constituted with headquarters at Mumbai with Justice

Shri R.S. Verma as its Presiding Officer and the said dispute

was referred to the said National Tribunal for adjudication

to proceed with the proceeding from the stage at what it

was left by Justice Shri R. G. Sindhakar ;

And whereas the term of Shri R. S. Verma expired on

7-1-1998 ;

And whereas, a National Industrial Tribunal was

constituted with headquarters at Mumbai with Justice

Shri C. V. Govardhan as its Presiding Officer and the said

dispute was referred to the said National Tribunal for

adjudication to proceed with the proceeding from the stage

at what it was left by Justice Shri R. S. Verma ;

And whereas the term of Shri C. V. Govardhan

expired on 8-1-2000 ;

And whereas, a National Industrial Tribunal was

constituted with headquarters at Mumbai with Justice

Shri S. C. Pandey as its Presiding Officer and the said dispute

was referred to the said National Tribunal for adjudication

to proceed with the proceeding from the stage at what it

was left by Justice Shri C. V. Govardhan ;

And whereas the term of Shri S. C. Pandey expired

on 8-09-2004 ;

And whereas, a National Industrial Tribunal was

constituted with headquarters at Mumbai with Justice

Shri Ghanshyam Dass as its Presiding Officer and the said

dispute was referred to the said National Tribunal for

adjudication to proceed with the proceeding from the stage

at what it was left by Justice Shri S. C. Pandey ;

And whereas Justice Shri Ghanshyam Dass

relinquished the charge of the said National Traibunal on

6-2-2006.

Now, therefore, a National Industrial Tribunal is

constituted with headquarters at Mumbai with Justice

Shri Gauri Shanker Sarraf as its Presiding Officer and the

above said dispute is referred to the said National Tribunal

for adjudication with direction that Justice Shri Gauri

Shanker Sarraf shall proceed with the proceeding from the

stage at what it was left by Justice Shri Ghanshyam Dass .

[No. L-12011/15/1994-IR (B-I)]

RAMESH SINGH, Desk Officer

vkns'k

ubZ fnYyh] 27 tuojh] 2011

dk-vk- 397-µtcfd dsUnz ljdkj dk ;g er Fkk fd

ctkt bySfDVªdYl fyfeVsM ds izca/u ds laca/ esa fu;ksDrkvksa vkSj

muds dkexkjksa ds chp blds lkFk layXu vuqlwph esa mfYyf[kr

ekeyksa ds laca/ esa ,d vkS|ksfxd fookn fo|eku gS _

vkSj tcfd dsUn ljdkj dk ;g er Fkk fd mi;qZDr fookn

dk U;k;&fu.kZ;u ,d jk"Vªh; vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k }kjk fd;k

tkuk pkfg,_

vkSj tcfd dsUn ljdkj] vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e]

1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 7 [k }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx

djrs gq, Je vkSj jkstxkj ea=kky; ds vkns'k la- ,y&42011@7@2009&

vkbZ vkj (Mh;w) fnukad 3&3&2008 }kjk ,d jk"Vªh; vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k dk xBu fd;k x;k Fkk ftldk eq[;ky; eqEcbZ esa Fkk

vkSj U;k;ew£r Jh lh- ih- feJk dks bldk ihBklhu

vf/dkjh fu;qDr fd;k x;k Fkk vkSj mDr vf/fu;e dh /kjk 10

dh mi&/kjk (1&d) }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;kas dk iz;ksx djrs gq, mDr

vkS|ksfxd fookn dks U;k;&fu.kZ;u gsrq mDr jk"Vªh; vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k dks lan£Hkr fd;k x;k Fkk A

vkSj tcfd U;k;ew£r Jh lh-ih- feJk dk dk;Zdky

2&04&2009 dks lekIr gks x;k Fkk rFkk mi;qZDr vkS|ksfxd fookn

ij vafre fu.kZ; vHkh rd yafcr gS _

F. 264-8

MSS 391-436

¹Hkkx IIó[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 5] 2011@ek?k 16] 1932

1097

vr%] vc ,d jk"Vªh; vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k dk xBu fd;k

tkrk gS ftldk eq[;ky; eqEcbZ eas gksxk vkSj ftlds ihBklhu

vf/dkjh Jh xkSjh 'kadj ljkZiQ gksaxs rFkk mi;qZDr jk"Vªh; vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k dks mi;qZDr fookn dks bl funs'k ds lkFk lan£Hkr fd;k

tkrk gS fd U;k;ew£r Jh xkSjh 'kadj ljkZiQ] bl ekeys esa ml

voLFkk ls vkxs dk;Zokgh djsaxs tgka U;k;ew£r Jh lh- ih- feJk us

bls NksM+k Fkk vkSj dkuwu ds vuqlkj bldk

fuiVku djsaxs A

vuqlwph

^^D;k ctkt bySfDVdYl fy- ds izca/u dh dkjZokbZ (i)

vuqca/ ds vuqlkj] 512 LFkk;h deZpkfj;ksa dh la[;k ugha j[k jgh

gS] rFkk (ii) lEiw.kZ Hkkjr esa daiuh dh fofHkUUk 'kk[kkvksa esa dk;Zjr

lh ,oa ,iQ ,tsaVksa }kjk yxk, x, deZdkjksa dks vius esa 'kkfey

djus ds ekeyksa esa fnukad 11&12&2004 ds f}i{kh; le>kSrs dks

fØ;kfUor ugha djuk fof/ lEer ,oa U;k;kSfpr gS \ ;fn ugha] rks

deZdkj fdu ykHkksa ds ik=k gSa \**

¹la- ,y&42011@7@2009&vkbZvkj(Mh;w)º

jes'k flag] MsLd vf/dkjh

ORDER

New Delhi, the 27th January, 2011

S.O. 397.— Whereas the Central Government was

of the opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the

management of Bajaj Electricals Limited and their workmen,

is respect of the Schedule hereto annexed.

And whereas the Central Government was of the

opinion that the said dispute should be adjudicated by a

National Industrial Tribunal ;

And whereas the Central Government in exercise of

the powers conferred by Section 7B of the I.D. Act, 1947

(14 of 1947), Constituted a National Industrial Tribunal

vide Ministry of Labour and Exployment Order No.

L -42011/7/2009-IR (DU) dated 3-3-2009 with headquarters

at Mumbai and appointed Justice Shri C.P. Mishra, as its

Presiding Officer, and in exercise of the powers conferred

by sub-section (1A) of Section 10 of the said Act, referred

the said Industrial Dsipute to the said National Industrial

Tribunal for adjudication .

And whereas, the term of Justice Shri C. P. Mishra

expired on 2-04-2009, and the above mentioned industrial

dispute is still pending final determination ;

Now, therefore, a National Industrial Tribunal is

constituted with Headquarters at Mumbai with Justice

Shri Gauri Shanker Sarraf as its Presiding Officer and

the above said dispute is referred to this National

Industrial Tribunal for adjudication with a direction that

Justice Shri Gauri Shanker Sarraf shall proceed in the

matter from the stage at which it was left by Justice

Shri C. P. Mishra and dispose of the same according to

law.

SCHEDULE

‘‘Whether the action of the management of Bajaj

Electricals Ltd. (i) in not maintaining strength of 512

permanent employees, as per Annexure, and (ii) in not

implementing the bipartite settlement dated 11-12-2004, in

matters of absorption of workmen engaged by C &F agents

working in different branches of the company all over

India, is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief the

workmen are entitled to ?’’

[No. L-42011/7/2009-IR (DU)]

RAMESH SINGH, Desk Officer

Printed by the Manager, Government of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi-110064

and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi-110054.