2786 GI/2013
(3193)
fof/k vkSj U;k; ea=ky;
¼fof/k dk;Z foHkkx½
ubZ fnYyh] 25 twu] 2013
dk-vk- 1225-
—jk"Vªifr] fnukad 28 ebZ] 2013 ls Jh gfju
ih- jkoy] ofj"B vf/koDrk dk vij egklkfyflVj] Hkkjr dk mPpre
U;k;ky; ds in ls R;kxi= Lohdkj djrs gSaA
[Qk-la- 18¼9½@2009&U;k-]
vkj- ,l- 'kqDy] la;qDr lfpo ,oa fof/k lykgdkj
MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE
(Department of Legal Affairs)
New Delhi, the 25th June, 2013
S.O.1225.—The President is pleased to accept the
resignation of Shri Harin P. Raval, Senior Advocate as
Additional Solicitor General, Supreme Court of India with
effect from 28th May, 2013.
[F.No. 18(9)/2009-Judl.]
R. S. SHUKLA, Jt. Secy. & Legal Adviser
dkfeZd] yksd f'kdk;r rFkk isa'ku ea=ky;
¼dkfeZd vkSj izf'k{k.k foHkkx½
ubZ fnYyh] 26 twu] 2013
dk-vk -1226-
—dsUnzh; ljdkj ,rn~}kjk naM izfØ;k lafgrk]
1973 ¼1974 dk vf/kfu;e la- 2½ dh /kkjk 24 dh mi&/kkjk ¼8½
}kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, fnYyh fo'ks"k iqfyl LFkkiuk
¼dsanzh; vUos"k.k C;wjks½ dh vksj ls ubZ fnYyh fLFkr fnYyh mPp
U;k;ky; vkSj Hkkjr ds lokSPp U;k;ky; esa
vkjlh&03¼,½@2004@,lh;w-&IX@ubZ fnYyh ¼gfj;k.kk dk
tschVh HkrhZ ?kksVkyk½] ekeys ls mRiUu vihyksa] iqujh{k.kksa
rFkk blls lac) vU; ekeyksa dk lapkyu djus ds fy,
Jh fl)kFkZ ywFkjk] vij egkU;k;f/koDrk dh fu;qfDr ls
lacaf/kr vf/klwpuk la- ,Q la- 225@22@2013&,ohMh&II dks
okil ysrh gSA
[Qk-la- 225@22@2013&,ohMh&II]
jktho tSu] voj lfpo
jftLVªh la- Mh- ,y- (,u) 04@0007@2003µ05
REGD. NO. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05
izkf/dkj ls izdkf'kr
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
lkIrkfgd
WEEKLY
la- 27]
ubZ fnYyh, twu 30—tqykbZ 6] 2013] 'kfuokj@vk"kk<+ 9—vk"kk<+ 15] 1935
No. 27]
NEW DELHI, JUNE 30—JULY 6, 2013, SATURDAY/ASHADHA 9—ASHADHA 15, 1935
Hkkx esa fHkUu i`"B la[;k nh tkrh gS ftlls fd ;g i`Fkd ladyu ds :i esa j[kk tk lds
Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation
Hkkx II—[k.M 3—mi&[k.M (ii)
PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)
Hkkjr ljdkj ds ea=kky;ksa (j{kk ea=kky; dks NksM+dj) }kjk tkjh fd, x, lkafof/d vkns'k vkSj vf/lwpuk,a
Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India
(Other than the Ministry of Defence)
3194
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 6, 2013/ASHADHA 15, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC
GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS
(Department of Personnel and Training)
New Delhi, the 26th June, 2013
S.O. 1226.—In exercise of the powers conferred by
sub-section (8) of Section 24 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure, 1973 (Act No. 2 of 1974), the Central
Government hereby withdraws the notification No. F.No.
225/22/2013-AVD-II dated 4.4.2013 regarding appointment
of Shri Sidharth Luthra, Additional Solicitor General, in
Delhi High Court and Supreme Court of India at New Delhi,
for conducting appeals, revisions and other matters arising
out the case RC 03(A)/2004/ACU-IX/New Delhi (JBT
Recruitment Scam of Haryana) on behalf of the Delhi
Special Police Establishment (Central Bureau of
Investigation).
[F. No. 225/22/2013-AVD-II]
RAJIV JAIN, Under Secy.
foÙk ea=ky;
¼jktLo foHkkx½
¼dsUnzh; mRikn 'kqYd vk;qDr dk dk;kZy;] csaxywj&II
vk;qDrky;½
csaxywj] 21 twu] 2013
la- 01@2013&14
dk-vk-1227µ
.—lhek&'kqYd vf/kfu;e] 1962 dh /kkjk 152
ds [kaM ¼d½ ds v/khu Hkkjr ljdkj] foÙk ea=ky;] jktLo foHkkx]
ubZ fnYyh ds fnukad 1 tqykbZ ] 1994 dh vf/klwpuk la- 33@94&lh-
'kq-¼,u-Vh-½ vkSj foRr ea=ky;] jktLo foHkkx] Hkkjr ljdkj] ubZ
fnYyh }kjk fnukafdr 25&10&2001 ds vf/klwpuk la- 122@2004&lh-
'kq-¼,u-Vh-½ esa ;Fkk la'kksf/kr ds tfj, eSa] v'kksd] vk;qDr] dsanzh;
mRikn 'kqYd] csaxywj&II, vk;qDrky;] csaxywj] iznRr 'kfDr;ksa dk
iz;ksx djrs gq, dukZVd jkT; ds rqedwj ftyk esa fLFkr losZ la- 9 ,oa
22] veyiqjk xkao] e/kqfxjh jksM] rqedwj rkywd ds v/khu vjdsjs
iksLV dks lhek 'kqYd vf/kfu;e] 1962 dh /kkjk 9 ds v/khu 100%
fu;kZrksUeq[k ,dd ¼bZ-vks-;w-½ dks LFkkfir djus dh lhfer mís'; ds
fy, HkkaMkxkj LVs'ku ,rn~}kjk ?kksf"kr djrk gwaA
[lh-la- IV/16/20/2013 bZ-vks-;w-] csa-&II]
v'kksd] vk;qDr
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
(OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL
EXCISE
BANGALORE-II, COMMISSIONERATE)
Bangalore, the 21st June, 2013
No. 01/2013-14
S.O.1227.—In exercise of powers delegated to the
undersigned under Section 9 of the Customs Act, 1962
read with Notification No. 33/1994-Cus (NT) dated 1-7-
1994 as amended by Notification No. 122/2004-Cus (NT)
dated 25-10-2001 issued by the Ministry of Finance,
Department of Revenue, Government of India, New Delhi,
under Clause (a) of Section 152 of the Customs Act, 1962,
I, Ashok, Commissioner of Central Excise, Bangalore II,
Commissionerate, Bangalore hereby declare Survey No. 9
& 22, Amalapura Village, Madhugiri Road, Arakere Post
falling under Tumkur Taluk, Tumkur District in the State of
Karnataka, as warehousing station under Section 9 of the
Customs Act, 1962 for the limited purpose of setting up of
a 100% EOU.
[C.No. IV/16/20/2013/EOU, BG-II]
ASHOK, Commissioner
¼foÙkh; lsok,a foHkkx½
ubZ fnYyh] 21 twu] 2013
dk-vk-
1228µ.—jk"Vªh;d`r cSad ¼izca/k ,oa izdh.kZ mica/k½
Ldhe] 1970@1980 ds [kaM 3 ds mi&[kaM ¼1½ ds lkFk ifBr cSaddkjh
daiuh ¼miØeksa dk vtZu ,oa varj.k½ vf/kfu;e] 1970@1980 dh
/kkjk 9 dh mi&/kkjk 3¼t½ vkSj ¼3&d½ }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk
iz;ksx djrs gq,] dsUnzh; ljdkj] ,rn~}kjk Jh lquhy dqekj ekgs'ojh
¼tUe frfFk % 10-08-1964½ dks mudh fu;qfDr dh vf/klwpuk dh
rkjh[k ls rhu o"kZ dh vof/k ds fy, vFkok vxys vkns'kksa rd] tks
Hkh igys gks] ;wdks cSad ds funs'kd e.My esa va'kdkfyd xSj&ljdkjh
funs'kd ukfer djrh gSA
[Qk-la- 6@24@2011&chvks&I]
fot; eYgks=k] voj lfpo
(Department of Financial Services)
New Delhi, the 21st June, 2013
S.O.1228.—In exercise of the powers conferred
by sub-section 3(h) and (3-A) of Section 9 of the Banking
Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings)
Act, 1970/1980 read with sub-clause (1) of clause 3 of
the Nationalized Banks (Management and Miscellaneous
Provisions) Scheme, 1970/1980, the Central Government
hereby nominates Shri Sunil Kumar Maheshwari
(DoB : 10.08.1964) as part-time non-official director on
the Board of Directors of UCO Bank for a period of three
years, from the date of notification of his appointment or
until further orders, whichever is earlier.
[F.No. 6/24/2011-BO-I]
VIJAY MALHOTRA, Under Secy.
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tqykbZ 6] 2013@vk"kk<+ 15] 1935
3195
ubZ fnYyh] 26 twu] 2013
dk-vk-
1229µ.—jk"Vªh;d`r cSad ¼izca/k ,oa izdh.kZ mica/k½
Ldhe] 1970@1980 ds [kaM 3 ds mi&[kaM ¼1½ ds lkFk ifBr cSaddkjh
daiuh ¼miØeksa dk vtZu ,oa varj.k½ vf/kfu;e] 1970@1980 dh
/kkjk 9 dh mi&/kkjk 3¼t½ vkSj ¼3&d½ }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk
iz;ksx djrs gq,] dsUnzh; ljdkj] ,rn~}kjk Jh lykgqíhu valkjh ¼tUe
frfFk 30-07-1946½ dks mudh fu;qfDr dh vf/klwpuk dh rkjh[k ls
rhu o"kZ dh vof/k ds fy, vFkok vxys vkns'kksa rd] tks Hkh igys
gks] ;wdks cSad ds funs'kd e.My esa va'kdkfyd xSj&ljdkjh funs'kd
ukfer djrh gSA
[Qk-la- 6@29@2011&chvks&I]
fot; eYgks=k] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 26th June, 2013
S.O.1229.—In exercise of the powers conferred
by sub-section 3(h) and (3-A) of Section 9 of the Banking
Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings)
Act, 1970/1980 read with sub-clause (1) of clause 3 of
the Nationalized Banks (Management and Miscellaneous
Provisions) Scheme, 1970/1980, the Central Government
hereby nominates Shri Salahuddin Ansari (DoB : 30.07.1946)
as part-time non-official director on the Board of Directors
of UCO Bank for a period of three years, from the date of
notification of his appointment or until further orders,
whichever is earlier.
[F.No. 6/29/2011-BO-I]
VIJAY MALHOTRA, Under Secy.
ubZ fnYyh] 26 twu] 2013
dk-vk-1230
.—jk"Vªh;d`r cSad ¼izca/k ,oa izdh.kZ mica/k½
Ldhe] 1970@1980 ds [kaM 9 ds mi&[kaM ¼1½ vkSj ¼2½ ds lkFk
ifBr cSaddkjh daiuh ¼miØeksa dk vtZu ,oa varj.k½ vf/kfu;e]
1970@1980 dh /kkjk 9 dh mi&/kkjk ¼3½ ds [kaM ¼³½ }kjk iznÙk
'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] dsUnzh; ljdkj] ,rn~}kjk cSad vkWQ
egkjk"Vª ds fo'ks"k lgk;d Jh jkenso y{ehpan lk;nhoky ¼tUe
frfFk 03-07-1956½ dks 21-07-2013 dks ;k mlds ckn in dk izHkkj
laHkkyus dh rkjh[k ls rhu o"kZ dh vof/k ds fy, vFkok cSad vkWQ
egkjk"Vª esa muds deZpkjh ds in ij cus jgus rd vFkok vxys
vkns'kksa rd] tks Hkh igys gks] cSad vkWQ egkjk"Vª ds funs'kd e.My
esa deZdkj deZpkjh funs'kd fuq;Dr djrh gSA
[Qk-la- 6@25@2012&chvks&I]
fot; eYgks=k] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 26th June, 2013
S.O.1230.—In exercise of the powers conferred by
clause (e) of sub-section (3) of Section 9 of The Banking
Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act,
1970/1980 read with sub-clause (1) and (2) of clause 9
of The Nationalized Banks (Management and
Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970/1980, the
Central Government hereby appoint Shri Ramadev
Laxmichand
Saydiwal
(DoB : 03-07-1956), Special Assistant, Bank of Maharashtra,
as Workmen Employee Director on the Board of Directors
of Bank of Maharashtra for a period of three years with
effect from the date of his taking over the charge of the
post on or after 21-07-2013 or until he ceases to be an
Workmen Employee of Bank of Maharashtra or until further
orders, whichever is the earlier.
[F.No. 6/25/2012-BO-I]
VIJAY MALHOTRA, Under Secy.
ubZ fnYyh] 26 twu] 2013
dk-vk-1231
.—jk"Vªh;d`r cSad ¼izca/k ,oa izdh.kZ mica/k½
Ldhe] 1970@1980 ds [kaM 9 ds mi&[kaM ¼1½ vkSj ¼2½ ds lkFk
ifBr cSaddkjh daiuh ¼miØeksa dk vtZu ,oa varj.k½ vf/kfu;e]
1970@1980 dh /kkjk 9 dh mi&/kkjk ¼3½ ds [kaM ¼p½ }kjk iznÙk
'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] dsUnzh; ljdkj] Hkkjrh; fjtoZ cSad ls
ijke'kZ djus ds i'pkr~ ,rn~}kjk iatkc us'kuy cSad ds eq[;
izca/kd Jh fnyhi dqekj lkg ¼tUe frfFk % 24-11-1958½ dks mudh
fu;qfDr dh vf/klwpuk dh rkjh[k ls rhu o"kZ dh vof/k ds fy,
vFkok iatkc us'kuy cSad esa muds vf/kdkjh ds in ij cus jgus rd
vFkok vxys vkns'kksa rd] tks Hkh igys gks] iatkc us'kuy cSad ds
funs'kd e.My esa vf/kdkjh deZpkjh funs'kd fuq;Dr djrh gSA
[Qk-la- 6@17@2012&chvks&I]
fot; eYgks=k] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 26th June, 2013
S.O.1231.—In exercise of the powers conferred by
clause (f) of sub-section (3) of Section 9 of The Banking
Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act,
1970/1980 read with sub-clause (1) and (2) of clause 9 of
The Nationalized Banks (Management and Miscellaneous
Provisions) Scheme, 1970/1980, the Central Government
after consultation with the Reserve Bank of India, hereby
appoint Shri Dilip Kumar Saha (DoB : 24-11-1958), Chief
Manager, Punjab National Bank, as Officer Employee
Director on the Board of Directors of Punjab National
Bank, for a period of three years, from the date of
notification of his appointment or until he ceases to be
an officer of the Punjab National Bank or until further
orders, whichever is the earliest.
[F.No. 6/17/2012-BO-I]
VIJAY MALHOTRA, Under Secy.
3196
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 6, 2013/ASHADHA 15, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
LokLF; ,oa ifjokj dY;k.k ea=ky;
¼LokLF; ,oa ifjokj dY;k.k foHkkx½
ubZ fnYyh] 9 uoEcj] 2012
dk-vk-1232
.— dsUnzh; ljdkj Hkkjrh; fpfdRlk ifj"kn vf/kfu;e] 1956 ¼1956 dk 102½ dh /kkjk 11 dh mi&/kkjk ¼2½ n~okjk iznÙk
'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, Hkkjrh; fpfdRlk ifj"kn ls ijke'kZ djus ds ckn] ,rn~}kjk vgZrk ds uke esa cnyko ds dkj.k mDr vf/kfu;e dh
igyh vuqlwph esa fuEufyf[kr vkSj la'kks/ku djrh g®] vFkkZr~%—
mDr vuqlwph esa&
d½
^^ve`rk fo'o fon~;kihB fo'ofo|ky;] dksph] dsjy** ds lkeus 'kh"kZd ^ekU;krkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk* [vc ds ckn LrHk ¼2½
ds :i esa lan£Hkr] ds varxZr vafre izfof"V vkSj mlls lacaf/kr izfof"V ds ckn 'kh"kZd ^iathdj.k ds fy, la{ksi.k* [vc ds ckn
LrHk ¼3½ ds :i esa lan£Hkr] ds vUrxZr fuEufyf[kr vUr%LFkkfir fd;k tk,xk] vFkkZr~%&
¼2½ ¼3½
^^ekLVj vkWQ ltZjh ¼tujy ltZjh½**
,e ,l ¼tujy ltZjh½
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ;fn ;g ve`rk Ldwy vkWQ esMhflu]
,El] dksph esa izf'f{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa ds laca/k esa ve`rk fo'o fo|kihBe
fo'ofo|ky;] dksph] dsjy n~okjk ebZ] 2012 esa vFkok mlds i'pkr~ iznku dh
xbZ gksA½
^^vksVksykWth ,oa ySfjaxykWth esa fMIyksek**
Mh ,y vks
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ;fn ;g ve`rk Ldwy vkWQ esMhflu]
,El] dksph esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa ds laca/k esa ve`rk fo'o fo|kihBe
fo'ofo|ky;] dksph] dsjy n~okjk ebZ] 2012 esa vFkok mlds i'pkr~ iznku dh
xbZ gksA½
^^vfLFk jksx foKku esa fMIyksek**
Mh vkFkksZ
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ;fn ;g ve`rk Ldwy vkWQ esMhflu]
,El] dksph esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksasa ds laca/k esa ve`rk fo'o fo|kihBe
fo'ofo|ky;] dksph] djsy n~okjk ebZ] 2012 esa vFkok mlds i'pkr~ iznku dh
xbZ gksA½
^^izlwfr ,oa L=h jksx esa fMIyksek**
Mh th vks
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ;fn ;g ve`rk Ldwy vkWQ esMhflu]
,El dksph esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa ds laca/k esa ve`rk fo'o fo|kihBe
fo'ofo|ky;] dksph]djsy n~okjk ebZ] 2012 esa vFkok mlds i'pkr~ iznku dh
xbZ gksA½
^^esMhdy jsfM;ks FkSjsih fMIyksek**
Mh ,e vkj Vh
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ;fn ;g ve`rk Ldwy vkWQ esMhflu]
,El dksph esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa ds laca/k esa ve`rk fo'o fo|kihBe
fo'ofo|ky;] dksph] djsy n~okjk ebZ] 2012 esa vFkok mlds i'pkr~ iznku dh
xbZ gksA½
^^peZ jksx] ;kSu jksx ,oa dq"B jksx foKku
Mh Mh oh ,y
esa fMIyksek
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ;fn ;g ve`rk Ldwy vkWQ esMhflu]
,El dksph esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa ds laca/k esa ve`rk fo'o fo|kihBe
fo'ofo|ky;] dksph]djsy n~okjk ebZ] 2012 esa vFkok mlds i'pkr~ iznku dh
xbZ gksA½
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tqykbZ 6] 2013@vk"kk<+ 15] 1935
3197
Mh lh ,p
^^cky LokLF; esa fMIyksek**
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ;fn ;g ve`rk Ldwy vkWQ
esMhflu] ,El dksph esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa ds laca/k esa ve`rk fo'o
fo|kihBe fo'ofo|ky;] dksph]djsy n~okjk ebZ] 2012 esa vFkok mlds i'pkr~
iznku dh xbZ gksA½
,e Mh ¼jsfM;ks funku½
^^MkDVj vkWQ esMhflu ¼jsfM;ks funku ½**
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ;fn ;g ve`rk Ldwy vkWQ
esMhflu] ,El dksph esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa ds laca/k esa ve`rk fo'o
fo|kihBe fo'ofo|ky;] dksph]djsy n~okjk ebZ] 2012 esa vFkok mlds i'pkr~
iznku dh xbZ gksA½
^^esMhdy jsfM;ks funku esa fMIyksek
Mh ,e vkj Mh
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ;fn ve`rk Ldwy vkWQ esMhflu]
,El dksph esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa ds laca/k esa ve`rk fo'o
fo|kihBe fo'ofo|ky;] dksph] djsy n~okjk ebZ] 2012 esa vFkok mlds i'pkr~
iznku dh xbZ gksA½
^^us= jksx foKku esa fMIyksek
Mhs vks
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ;fn ve`rk Ldwy vkWQ esMhflu]
,El dksph esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa ds laca/k esa ve`rk fo'o
fo|kihBe fo'ofo|ky;] dksph] djsy n~okjk ebZ] 2012 esa vFkok mlds i'pkr~
iznku dh xbZ gksA½
¼[k½ ^^dkyhdV fo'ofo|ky;] djsy** ds lkeus 'kh"kZd ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk ¼vc ds ckn LrHk ¼2½ ds :i esa lan£Hkr½ ds
varxZr vafre izfof"V vkSj mlls lacaf/kr izfof"V ds ckn 'kh"kZd ^iathdj.k ds fy, la{ksi.k ¼vc ds ckn LrHk ¼3½ ds Li esa
lan£Hkr½ ds vUrxZr fuEufyf[kr vUr%LFkkfir fd;k tk,xk] vFkkZr~ %µ
MkWDVj vkWQ esfMlhu ¼iSFkksykWth½
,e Mh ¼iSFkksykWth½
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ;fn ;g esfMdy dkWyst] f='kwj]
dsjy] eas izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa ds laca/k esa] dkyhdV fo'ofo|ky;]
dsjy n~okjk twu] 2012 esa vFkok mlds i'pkr~ iznku dh xbZ gks A½
¼x½ ^^jktho xka/kh LokLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky;] caxyq:** ds lkeus 'kh"kZd ^ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk* vc ds ckn LrHk ¼2½ ds
:i esa lan£Hkr] ds vzarxZr vafre izfof"V vkSj mlls lacaf/kr izfof"V ds ckn 'kh"kZd ^iathdj.k ds fy, la{ksi.k* vc ds ckn LrHk
¼3½ ds :i esa lan£Hkr] ds vUrxZr fuEufyf[kr vUr%LFkkfir fd;k tk,xk] vFkkZr~%&
^^MkDVj vkWQ esfMflu@ekLVj vkWQ
,eMh@,e ,l ¼izlwfr ,oa L=h jksx½
ltZjh ¼izlwfr ,oa L=h jksx½**
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ;fn ;g uoksn; esMhdy dkWyst]
jk;iqj] dukZVd] esa izf'f{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa ds laca/k esa] jktho xka/kh
LokLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky;] casxyq# n~okjk ebZ] 2012 esa vFkok mlds i'pkr~
iznku dh xbZ gks A½
^^MkDVj vkWQ esfMflu ¼QkeZdksykWth½**
,eMh ¼QkeZdksykWth½
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ;fn ;g ,d Qknj ewyj esMhdy
dkWyst eaxykSj] dukZVd] esa izf'f{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa ds laca/k esa] jktho
xka/kh LokLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky;]casxyq#] n~okjk ebZ] 2012 esa vFkok mlds
i'pkr~ iznku dh xbZ gksA½
¼?k ½ ^^egkjk"Vª LokLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky;] ukfld] egkjk"Vª** ds lkeus 'kh"kZd ^ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk [vc ds ckn LrHk
¼2½ ds :i esa lan£Hkr] ds varxZr vafre izfof"V vkSj mlls lacaf/kr izfof"V ds ckn 'kh"kZd ^iathdj.k ds fy, la{ksi.k* [vc ds
ckn LrHk ¼3½ ds :i esa lanfHkZr] ds vUrxZr fuEufyf[kr vUr%LFkkfir fd;k tk,xk] vFkkZr~%&
¼2½ ¼3½
3198
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 6, 2013/ASHADHA 15, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
^^MkDVj vkWQ esMhflu ¼peZ] jksx] ;kSu
,e Mh ¼Mh oh ,y½
jksx ,oa dq"B jksx foKku½
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ;fn ;g MkWñ olarjko iokj
esMhdy dkWyst ,oa vuqla/kku dsanz] ukfld] egkjk"Vª] esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs
fo|kfFkZ;ksa ds laca/k esa] egkjk"Vª LokLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky;] ukfld] egkjk"Vª
n~okjk ebZ] 2012 esa vFkok mlds i'pkr~ iznku dh xbZ A½
^^laKkgj.k foKku esa fMIyksek**
Mh ,
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ;fn ;g MkWñ olarjko iokj esMhdy
dkWyst ,oa vuqla/kku dsanz] ukfld] egkjk"Vª] esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa
ds laca/k esa egkjk"Vª LokLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky;] ukfld] egkjk"Vª n~okjk twu]
2012 esa vFkok mlds i'pkr~ iznku dh xbZ gks A½
^^MkDVj vkWQ esMhflu ¼jsfM;ks funku@jsfM;ksyksth½
,e Mh ¼jsfM;ks funku@jsfM;ksykth½ ¼jsfM;ks funku½** ¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr
fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ;fn ;g MkWñ olarjko iokj esMhdy dkWyst ,ao vuqla/kku
dsasnz] ukfld] egkjk"Vª] esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa ds laca/k esa] egkjk"Vª
LokLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky;] ukfld] egkjk"Vª n~okjk twu] 2012 esa vFkok
mlds i'pkr~ iznku dh xbZ gks A½
^^MkDVj vkWQ esMhflu ¼tujy
,e Mh ¼tujy esMhflu½
esMhflu½**
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ;fn ;g MkWñ olarjko iokj esMhdy
dkWyst ,ao vuqla/kku dsasnz] ukfld] egkjk"Vª] esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa
ds laca/k esa] egkjk"Vª LokLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky;] ukfld] egkjk"Vª n~okjk twu]
2012 esa vFkok mlds i'pkr~ iznku dh xbZ gks A½
^^ekLVj vkWQ ltZjh ¼vksVks jkbZuks
,e ,l ¼bZ ,u Vh½
ySfjaxksykWth½**
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ;fn ;g MkWñ olarjko iokj esMhdy
dkWyst ,ao vuqla/kku dsasnz] ukfld] egkjk"Vª] esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa
ds laca/k esa] egkjk"Vª LokLF; foKku fo'ofon~;ky;] ukfld] egkjk"Vª n~okjk
twu] 2012 esa vFkok mlds i'pkr~ iznku dh xbZ gks A½
^^ekLVj vkWQ ltZjh ¼vfLFk jksx
,e ,l ¼vkWFkksZ½
foKku½**
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ;fn ;g MkWñ olarjko iokj esMhdy
dkWyst ,ao vuqla/kku dsasnz] ukfld] egkjk"Vª] esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa
ds laca/k esa] egkjk"Vª LokLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky;] ukfld] egkjk"Vª n~okjk twu]
2012 esa vFkok mlds i'pkr~ iznku dh xbZ A½
^^MkDVj vkWQ esMhflu@ekLVj vkWQ
,e Mh@,e ,l ¼us= jksx foKku½
ltZjh ¼us= jksx foKku½**
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ;fn ;g MkWñ olarjko iokj esMhdy
dkWyst ,ao vuqla/kku dsasnz] ukfld] egkjk"Vª] esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa
ds laca/k esa] egkjk"Vª LokLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky;] ukfld] egkjk"Vª n~okjk twu]
2012 esa vFkok mlds i'pkr~ iznku dh xbZ gks A½
^^ekLVj vkWQ ltZjh ¼tujy esMhflu½**
,e ,l ¼tujy ltZjh½
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ;fn ;g MkWñ olarjko iokj esMhdy
dkWyst ,ao vuqla/kku dsasnz] ukfld] egkjk"Vª] esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa
ds laca/k esa] egkjk"Vª LokLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky;] ukfld] egkjk"Vª n~okjk twu]
2012 esa vFkok mlds i'pkr~ iznku dh xbZ gks A½
¼2½ ¼3½
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tqykbZ 6] 2013@vk"kk<+ 15] 1935
3199
lHkh ds laca/k esa uksV% 1- fdlh LukRdksÙkj ikB~;Øe ds fy, iznÙk ,slh ekU;rk 5 o"kks± dh vf/kdre vof/k ds fy, gksxh] ftlds mijkar bldk
uohuhdj.k djokuk iM+sxkA
2- mi&[kaM 4 esa ;Fkkisf{kr ekU;rk ds le;iwoZd uohuhdj.k laca/kh vis{kk esa vlQy jgus dk vfuok;Zr% ifj.kke lacaf/kr LukRdksÙkj ikB~;Øe
esa nkf[kyk can djus ds :i esa fudysxkA
[la- ;w- 12012@79@2012&,ebZ¼ih&II)]
vuhrk f=ikBh] voj lfpo
MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE
(Department of Health and Family Welfare)
New Delhi, the 9th November, 2012
S.O.1232.— In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of the Section 11 of the Indian Medical Council
Act, 1956 (102 of 1956), the Central Government, after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby makes the following
further amendments in the First Schedule to the said Act, due to change of nomenclature of the qualification namely:—
In the said Schedule—
(a) against "Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham University, Kochi, Kerala" under the heading 'Recognised Medical
Qualification ' [hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading
'Abbreviation for Registration' [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely:—
(2)
(3)
"Master of Surgery(General Surgery)"
MS (General Surgery)
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham University, Kochi, Kerala in respect of
the students being trained at Amrita School of Medicine, AIMS,
Kochi on or after May, 2012.
"Diploma in Otology & Laryngology"
DLO
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham University, Kochi, Kerala in respect of
the students being trained at Amrita School of Medicine, AIMS,
Kochi on or after May, 2012.
"Diploma in Orthopaedics"
D. Ortho.
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham University, Kochi, Kerala in respect of
the students being trained at Amrita School of Medicine, AIMS,
Kochi on or after May, 2012.
"Diploma in Gynaecology & Obstetrics"
DGO
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham University, Kochi, Kerala in respect of
the students being trained at Amrita School of Medicine, AIMS,
Kochi on or after May, 2012.
"Diploma in Medical Radio Therapy"
DMRT
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Amrita VishwaVidyapeetham University, Kochi, Kerala in respect
of the students being trained at Amrita School of Medicine, AIMS,
Kochi on or after May, 2012.
3200
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 6, 2013/ASHADHA 15, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
"Diploma in Dermatology, Venreology & Leprosy"
DDVL
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham University, Kochi, Kerala in respect
of the students being trained at Amrita School of Medicine, AIMS,
Kochi on or after May, 2012.
"Diploma in Child Health"
DCH
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham University, Kochi, Kerala in respect
of the students being trained at Amrita School of Medicine, AIMS,
Kochi on or after May, 2012.
"Doctor of Medicine (Radio Diagnosis)"
MD (Radio Diagnosis)
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham University, Kochi, Kerala in respect
of the students being trained at Amrita School of Medicine, AIMS,
Kochi on or after May, 2012.
"Diploma in Medical Radio Diagnosis"
DMRD
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham University, Kochi, Kerala in respect
of the students being trained at Amrita School of Medicine, AIMS,
Kochi on or after May, 2012.
"Diploma in Opthalmology"
DO
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham University, Kochi, Kerala in respect
of the students being trained at Amrita School of Medicine, AIMS,
Kochi on or after May, 2012.
(b) against "Calicut University, Kerala" under the heading 'Recognised Medical Qualification' [hereinafter referred to as
column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading 'Abbreviation for Registration' [hereinafter
referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely:—
"Doctor of Medicine (Pathology)"
MD (Pathology)
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Calicut University, Kerala in respect of the students being trained
at Govt. Medical College, Thrissur, Kerala on or after June, 2012.
(c) against "Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Bangalore" under the heading 'Recognised Medical Qualification'
[hereinater referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading 'Abbreviation for
Registration' [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be insterted, namely:—
"Doctors of Medicine/Master of Surgery
MD/MS (OBG)
(Obstetrics & Gynaecology)"
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Bangalore in respect
of students being trained at Navodaya Medical College Raichur,
Karnataka on or after May, 2012.
"Doctor of Medicine(Pharmacology)"
MD (Pharmacology)
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Bangalore in respect of
students being trained at Father Muller Medical College Mangalore,
Karnataka on or after May, 2012.
¼2½ ¼3½
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tqykbZ 6] 2013@vk"kk<+ 15] 1935
3201
d) against "Maharasthtra University of Health Sciences, Nashik, Maharashtra" under the heading 'Recognised Medical
Qualification' [hereinater referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading
'Abbreviation for Registration' [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be insterted, namely:—
¼2½ ¼3½
"Doctor of Medicine(Dermatology, Venerology
MD (DVL)
& Leprosy)"
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, Nashik, Maharashtra
in respect of students being trained at Dr. Vasantarao Pawar Medical
College & Research Centre, Nashik, Maharashtra on or after May,
2012.
"Diploma in Anaesthesia"
DA
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, Nashik, Maharashtra
in respect of students being trained at Dr. Vasantarao Pawar Medical
College & Research Centre, Nashik, Maharashtra on or after June,
2012.
"Doctor of Medicine (Radio Diagnosis/Radiology)" MD (Radio Diagnosis/Radiology)
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, Nashik, Maharashtra
in respect of students being trained at Dr. Vasantarao Pawar Medical
College & Research Centre, Nashik, Maharashtra on or after June,
2012.
"Doctor of Medicine(General Medicine)"
MD(General Medicine)
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, Nashik, Maharashtra
in respect of students being trained at Dr. Vasantarao Pawar Medical
College & Research Centre, Nashik, Maharashtra on or after June,
2012.
"Master of Surgery(Oto-Rhino-Laryngology)"
MS(ENT)
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, Nashik, Maharashtra
in respect of students being trained at Dr. Vasantarao Pawar Medical
College & Research Centre, Nashik, Maharashtra on or after June,
2012.
"Master of Surgery(Orthopaedics)"
MS(Orthopadedics)
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, Nashik, Maharashtra
in respect of students being trained at Dr. Vasantarao Pawar Medical
College & Research Centre, Nashik, Maharashtra on or after June,
2012.
"Doctor of Medicine/Master of Surgery
MD/MS (Ophthalmology)
(Ophthalmology)"
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, Nashik, Maharashtra
in respect of students being trained at Dr. Vasantarao Pawar Medical
College & Research Centre, Nashik, Maharashtra on or after June,
2012.
"Master of Surgery(General Surgery)"
MS (General Surgery)
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, Nashik, Maharashtra in
3202
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 6, 2013/ASHADHA 15, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
respect of students being trained at Dr. Vasantarao Pawar Medical
College & Research Centre, Nashik, Maharashtra on or after June, 2012.
Note to all: 1.
The recognition so granted to a Postgraduate Course shall be for a maximum period of 5 years, upon
which it shall have to be renewed.
2.
Failure to seek timely renewal of recognition as required in sub-clause-4 shall invariably result in
stoppage of admissions to the concerned Postgraduate Course.
[No. U. 12012/79/2012-ME(P-II)]
ANITA TRIPATHI, Under Secy.
ubZ fnYyh] 19 uoEcj] 2012
dk-vk-1233 µ
.—dsUnzh; ljdkj Hkkjrh; fpfdRlk ifj"kn vf/kfu;e] 1956 ¼1956 dk 102½ dh /kkjk 11 dh mi /kkjk ¼2½ }kjk iznÙk
'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] Hkkjrh; fpfdRlk ifj"kn ls ijke'kZ djus ds ckn] ,rn}kjk vgZrk ds uke esa cnyko ds dkj.k mDr vf/kfu;e dh
izFke vuqlwph esa fuEufyf[kr vkSj la'kks/ku djrh gS] vFkkZr~%
mDr vuqlwph esa µ
¼d½ ^^jktLFkku LokLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky;] t;iqj** ds lkeus 'kh"kZd ^ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk* [vc ds ckn LraHk ¼2½ ds :i
esa lanfHkZr]ds varxZr vafre izfof"V vkSj mlls lacaf/kr izfof"V ds ckn 'kh"kZd ^iathdj.k ds fy, la{ksi.k* [vc ds ckn LrHk ¼3½
ds :i esa lanfHkZr] ds varxZr fuEufyf[kr var%LFkkfir fd;k tk,xk] vFkkZr~%µ
¼2½ ¼3½
^^MkWDVj vkWQ esMhflu ¼peZ jksx] ;kSu jksx ,oa dq"B jksx½**
,e Mh ¼Mh oh ,y½
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ;fn ;g jktdh; esMhdy dkWyst]
dksVk] jktLFkku esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fon~;kfFkZ;ksa ds laca/k esa jktLFkku
LokLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky; ] t;iqj }kjk twu] 2012 esa vFkok mlds i'pkr
iznku dh xbZ gks½A
¼[k½ ^^Jh ckykth fon~;kihB fo'ofo|ky; iqMqpsjh** ds lkeus 'kh"kZd ^ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk* [vc ds ckn LraHk ¼2½ ds :i
esa lanfHkZr] ds varxZr vafre izfof"V vkSj mlls lacaf/kr izfof"V ds ckn 'kh"kZd ^iathdj.k ds fy, la{ksi.k* [vc ds ckn LrHk ¼3½
ds :i esa lanfHkZr] ds varxZr fuEufyf[kr var%LFkkfir fd;k tk,xk] vFkkZr~%µ
¼2½ ¼3½
^^MkWDVj vkWQ esMhflu ¼iSFkksykWth½**
,eMh ¼iSFkksykWth½
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ;fn ;g egkRek xka/kh esMhdy
dkWyst ,oa vuqla/kku laLFkku] iksaMhpsjh esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fon~;kfFkZ;ksa ds
laca/k esa Jh ckykth fon~;kihB fo'ofo|ky; ] iqMqpsjh }kjk vizSy] 2012 esa
vFkok mlds i'pkr iznku dh xbZ gks½A
¼x½ ^^n rfeyukMq MkW ,e th vkj esMhdy fo'ofo|ky; ] psUubZ** ds lkeus 'kh"kZd ^ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk* [vc ds ckn
LraHk ¼2½ ds :i esa lanfHkZr] ds varxZr vafre izfof"V vkSj mlls lacaf/kr izfof"V ds ckn 'kh"kZd* iathdj.k ds fy, la{ksi.k* [vc
ds ckn LrHk ¼3½ ds :i esa lanfHkZr] ds varxZr fuEufyf[kr var%LFkkfir fd;k tk,xk] vFkkZr~%µ
¼2½ ¼3½
ekLVj vkWQ ltZjh ¼vfLFk jksx foKku½
,e ,l ¼vfLFk jksx foKku½
¼;g ,d ekU;rk izkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ;fn ;gka LVsayh esMhdy dkWyst]
psUubZ esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fon~;kfFkZ;ksa ds laca/k esa rfeyukMq MkW ,e th vkj
esMhdy fo'ofo|ky;] psUubZ }kjk vizSy] 2012 vFkok mlds i'pkr iznku
dh xbZ ½A
^^MkWDVj vkWQ esMhflu ¼fQft;ksykWth½**
,e Mh ¼fQft;ksykWth½
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ;fn ;g fr#usYosyh esMhdy
dkWyst] fr#usYosyh esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa ds laca/k esa n rfeyUkkMq
MkW ,e th vkj esMhdy fo'ofo|ky;] psUubZ }kjk vizSy] 2012 vFkok mlds
i'pkr iznku dh xbZ ½
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tqykbZ 6] 2013@vk"kk<+ 15] 1935
3203
¼?k½ ^^Lokeh foosdkuan lqHkkjrh fo'ofo|ky;] esjB] mÙkj izns'k** ds lkeus 'kh"kZd ^ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk* [vc ds ckn LraHk
¼2½ ds :i esa lanfHkZr] ds varxZr vafre izfof"V vkSj mlls lacaf/kr izfof"V ds ckn 'kh"kZd ^iathdj.k ds fy, la{ksi.k* [vc ds
ckn LrHk¼3½ ds :i esa lanfHkZr] ds vUrxZr fuEufyf[kr vUr%LFkkfir fd;k tk,xk] vFkkZr~%&
¼2½ ¼3½
^^ekLVj vkWQ ltZjh ¼tujy ltZjh½**
,e ,l ¼tujy ltZjh½
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ;fn ;g lqHkkrhZ esMhdy dkWyst
esjB] mÙkj izns'k esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fon~;kfFkZ;ksa ds laca/k esa] Lokeh foosdkuan
lqHkkrhZ fo'ofon~;ky;] esjB] mÙkj izns'k n~okjk ebZ 2012 esa vFkok mlds i'pkr~
iznku dh xbZ½
¼M½ ^^if'pe caxky LokLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky;] dksydkrk** ds lkeus 'kh"kZd ^ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk* [vc ds ckn LraHk ¼2½ ds :i
esa lanfHkZr] ds varxZr vafre izfof"V vkSj mlls lacaf/kr izfof"V ds ckn 'kh"kZd
^iathdj.k ds fy, la{ksi.k* [vc ds ckn LrHk ¼3½ ds :i esa lanfHkZr] ds
vUrxZr fuEufyf[kr vUr%LFkkfir fd;k tk,xk] vFkkZr~%&
¼2½ ¼3½
^^ekLVj vkWQ ltZjh ¼us= jksx foKku½**
,e ,l ¼us= jksx foKku½
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ;fn ;g cnZoku esMhdy dkWyst
cnZoku] esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fon~;kfFkZ;ksa ds laca/k esa] if'pe caxky LokLF;
foKku fo'ofon~;ky;] dksydkrk n~okjk ebZ] 2012 esa vFkok mlds i'pkr
iznku dh xbZ½
^^us= jksx foKku esa fMIyksek**
Mh vks
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ;fn ;g cnZoku esMhdy dkWyst
cnZoku] esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fon~;kfFkZ;ksa ds laca/k esa] if'pe caxky LokLF;
foKku fo'ofon~;ky;] dksydkrk n~okjk o"kZ 1994 ls 2006 esa iznku dh xbZ½
^^MkDVj vkWQ esMhflu ¼lkeqnkf;d esMhflu½**
,e Mh ¼jsfM;ks funku@jsfM;ksyksth½
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ;fn ;g cnZoku esMhdy dkWyst
cnZoku] esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fon~;kfFkZ;ksa ds laca/k esa] if'pe caxky LokLF;
foKku fo'ofon~;ky;] dksydkrk n~okjk ebZ] 2012 esa vFkok mlds i'pkr
iznku dh xbZ½
^^MkDVj vkWQ esMhflu ¼euksfpfdRlk½**
,e Mh ¼euksfpfdRlk½
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ;fn ;g cnZoku esMhdy dkWyst
cnZoku] esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fon~;kfFkZ;ksa ds laca/k esa] if'pe caxky LokLF;
foKku fo'ofon~;ky;] dksydkrk n~okjk vizSy] 2012 esa vFkok mlds i'pkr
iznku dh xbZ½
^^MkDVj vkWQ esMhflu ¼Qksjsafld esMhflu½**
,e Mh ¼Qksjsafld esMhflu½
¼;g ,dekU;rk izkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ;fn ;g cnZoku esMhdy dkWyst
cnZoku] esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fon~;kfFkZ;ksa ds laca/k esa] if'pe caxky LokLF;
foKku fo'ofon~;ky;] dksydkrk n~okjk ebZ] 2012 esa vFkok mlds i'pkr
iznku dh xbZ½
^^MkDVj vkWQ esMhflu ¼tujy esMhflu½**
,e Mh ¼tujy esMhflu½
¼;g ,d ekU;rk izkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ;fn ;g cnZoku esMhdy dkWyst
cnZoku] esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fon~;kfFkZ;ksa ds laca/k esa] if'pe caxky LokLF;
foKku fo'ofon~;ky;] dksydkrk n~okjk twu] 2012 esa vFkok mlds i'pkr
iznku dh xbZ½
3204
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 6, 2013/ASHADHA 15, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
^^ekLVj vkWQ ltZjh ¼tujy ltZjh½**
,e ,l ¼tujy ltZjh½
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ;fn ;g cadqjk lfEeykuh esMhdy
dkWyst cadqjk] esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fon~;kfFkZ;ksa ds laca/k esa] if'pe caxky
LokLF; foKku fo'ofon~;ky;] dksydkrk n~okjk twu] 2012 esa vFkok mlds
i'pkr iznku dh xbZ½
^^MkWDVj vkWQ esMhflu ¼cky jksx foKku½**
,e Mh ¼cky jksx foKku½
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ;fn ;g cadqjk lfEeykuh esMhdy
dkWyst cadqjk] esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fon~;kfFkZ;ksa ds laca/k esa] if'pe caxky
LokLF; foKku fo'ofon~;ky;] dksydkrk n~okjk twu] 2012 esa vFkok mlds
i'pkr iznku dh xbZ½
^^MkWDVj vkWQ esMhflu ¼tujy esMhflu½**
,e Mh ¼tujy esMhflu½
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ;fn ;g cadqjk lfEeykuh esMhdy
dkWyst cadqjk] esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fon~;kfFkZ;ksa ds laca/k esa] if'pe caxky
LokLF; foKku fo'ofon~;ky;] dksydkrk n~okjk twu] 2012 esa vFkok mlds
i'pkr iznku dh xbZ½
^^MkWDVj vkWQ esMhflu@ekLVj vkWQ ltZjh
,e Mh@,e ,l ¼vks ch th½
¼izlwfr ,oa L=h jksx foKku½**
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ;fn ;g cadqjk lfEeykuh esMhdy
dkWyst cadqjk] esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fon~;kfFkZ;ksa ds laca/k esa] if'pe caxky
LokLF; foKku fo'ofon~;ky;] dksydkrk n~okjk twu] 2012 esa vFkok mlds
i'pkr iznku dh xbZ½
^^MkWDVj vkWQ esMhflu ¼laKkgj.k½**
,e Mh ¼laKkgj.k½
¼;g ,dekU;rk izkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ;fn ;g uhyjru ljdkj esMhdy
dksydkrk dkWyst esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fon~;kfFkZ;ksa ds laca/k esa] if'pe
caxky LokLF; foKku fo'ofon~;ky;] dksydkrk n~okjk ebZ] 2012 esa vFkok
mlds i'pkr iznku dh xbZ½
lHkh ds lEca/k esa uksV% 1 fdlh LukRdksrj ikB~;Øe ds fy, iznr ,slh ekU;rk 5 o"kks± dh vf/kdre vof/k ds fy, gksxh] ftlds mijkar
bldk uohuhdj.k djokuk iMsxkA
2- mi&[kaM&4 esa ;Fkkisf{kr ekU;rk ds le;iwoZd uohuhdj.k lac/kh vis{kk esa vlQy jgus dk vfuokZ;r% ifj.kke lacaf/kr LukRdksrj
ikB~;Øe esa nkf[kyk can djus ds :i esa fudysxkA
[ lañ ;wñ 12012@78@2012&,e bZ (ih&II)]
vuhrk f=ikBh] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 19th November, 2012
S.O. 1233.— In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of the section 11 of the Indian Medical
Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956), the Central Government, after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby makes
the following further amendments in the First Schedule to the said Act, due to change of nomenclature of the qualification
namely:-
In the said Schedule-
(a)
against "Rajasthan University of Health Sciences, Jaipur" under the heading 'Recognised Medical Qualification'
[hereinafter referred to as column (2) ], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading
'Abbreviation for Registration' [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted,
namely:—
¼2½ ¼3½
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tqykbZ 6] 2013@vk"kk<+ 15] 1935
3205
"Doctor of Medicine (Dermatology, Venerology
MD(DVL)
& Leprosy)"
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Rajasthan University of Health Sciences, Jaipur in respect of
students being trained at Govt. Medical College, Kota, Rajasthan
on or after June, 2012.)
(b)
against "Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth University, Puducherry" under the heading 'Recognised Medical Qualification'
[hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading
'Abbreviation for Registration' [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely:-
(2) (3)
"Doctor of Medicine (Pathology)"
MD(Pathology)
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth University Puducherry in respect of students
being trained at Mahatma Gandhi Medical College, & Research
Institute, Pondicherry on or after April 2012.)
(c)
against "The Tamil Nadu, Dr. MGR Medical University, Chennai" under the heading 'Recognised Medical
Qualification' [hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the
heading 'Abbreviation for Registration' [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted,
namely:-
(2) (3)
"Master of Surgery (Orthopaedics)"
MS(Orthopaedeics)
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
The Tamil Nadu Dr. MGR Medical University Chennai in respect
of students being trained at Stanley Medical College, Chennai on
or after April, 2012.)
"Doctor of Medicine (Physiology)"
MD(Physiology)
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
The Tamil Nadu Dr. MGR Medical University Chennai in respect
of students being trained at Tirunelveli Medical College, Tirunelveli
on or after April, 2012.)
(i) against "Swami Vivekanand Subharti University, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh" under the heading 'Recognised Medical
Qualification' [hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading
'Abbreviation for Registration' [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely:-
(2) (3)
"Master of Surgery (General Surgery)"
MS(General Surgery)
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Swami Vivekanand Subharti University Meerut, Uttar Pradesh in
respect of students being trained at Subharti Medical College,
Meerut, Uttar Pradesh on or after May, 2012.)
(j)
against "West Bengal University, of Health Sciences, Kolkata" under the heading 'Recognised Medical
Qualification' [hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the
heading 'Abbreviation for Registration' [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted,
namely:-
(2) (3)
"Master of Surgery (Ophthalmology)"
MS(Ophthalmology)
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
West Bengal University of Health Sciences, Kolkata in respect of
students being trained at Burdwan Medical College, Burdwan on
or after May, 2012.)
"Diploma in Ophthalmology"
DO
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
West Bengal University of Health Sciences, Kolkata in respect of
students being trained at Burdwan Medical College, Burdwan from
(2) (3)
3206
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 6, 2013/ASHADHA 15, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1994 to 2006.)
"Doctor of Medicine (Community Medicine)"
MD(Community Medicine)
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
West Bengal University of Health Sciences, Kolkata in respect of
students being trained at Burdwan Medical College, Burdwan on
or after May, 2012.)
"Doctor of Medicine (Psychiatry)"
MD(Psychiatry)
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
West Bengal University of Health Sciences, Kolkata in respect of
students being trained at Burdwan Medical College, Burdwan on
or after April, 2012.)
"Doctor of Medicine (Forensic Medicine)"
MD(Forensic Medicine)
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
West Bengal University of Health Sciences, Kolkata in respect of
students being trained at Burdwan Medical College, Burdwan on
or after May, 2012.)
"Doctor of Medicine (General Medicine)"
MD(General Medicine)
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
West Bengal University of Health Sciences, Kolkata in respect of
students being trained at Burdwan Medical College, Burdwan on
or after June, 2012.)
"Master of Surgery (General Surgery)"
MS(General Surgery)
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
West Bengal University of Health Sciences, Kolkata in respect of
students being trained at Bankura Sammilani Medical College,
Bankura on or after June, 2012.)
"Doctor of Medicine (Paediatrics)"
MD(Paediatrics)
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
West Bengal University of Health Sciences, Kolkata in respect of
students being trained at Bankura Sammilani Medical College,
Bankura Sammilani on or after June, 2012.)
"Doctor of Medicine (General Medicine)"
MD(General Medicine)
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
West Bengal University of Health Sciences, Kolkata in respect of
students being trained at Bankura Sammilani Medical College,
Bankura on or after June, 2012.)
"Doctor of Medicine/Master of Surgery
MD/MS(OBG)
(Obstetrics & Gynaecology)"
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
West Bengal University of Health Sciences, Kolkata in respect of
students being trained at Bankura Sammilani Medical College,
Bankura on or after June, 2012.)
"Doctor of Medicine (Anaesthesia)"
MD(Anaesthesia)
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
West Bengal University of Health Sciences, Kolkata in respect of
students being trained at Nilratan Sircar Medical College, Kolkata
on or after May, 2012.)
(2) (3)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tqykbZ 6] 2013@vk"kk<+ 15] 1935
3207
Note to all: 1. The recognition so granted to a Postgraduate Course shall be for a maximum period of 5 years, upon
which it shall have to be renewed.
2.
Failure to seek timely renewal of recognition as required in sub-clause-4 shall invariably result in stoppage
of admissions to the concerned Postgraduate Course.
[No. U.12012/78/2012-ME(P-II)]
ANITA TRIPATHI, Under Secy.
ubZ fnYyh] 2 tuojh] 2013
dkñvkñ 1234-
—dsUnzh; ljdkj] Hkkjrh; fpfdRlk ifj"kn vf/kfu;e] 1956 ¼1956 dk 102½ dh /kkjk 11 dh mi&/kkjk ¼2½ }kjk iznÙk
'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, Hkkjrh; fpfdRlk ifj"kn ls ijke'kZ djus ds ckn ,rn~}kjk mDr vf/kfu;e dh igyh vuqlwph esa fuEufyf[kr vkSj
la'kks/ku djrh gS uker%
mDr vuqlwph esa&
¼d½ ^^egk_f"k ekd±Ms'oj fo'ofo|ky;] ewYykuk&vEckyk] gfj;k.kk** ds lkeus ^ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk* [blds vkxs dkWye
¼2½ ds :i esa lanfHkZr] ds varxZr 'kh"kZd ^iathdj.k ds fy, lais{k.k* [blds vkxs dkWye ¼3½ ds :i esa lanfHkZr] ds varxZr
vafre izfof"V vkSj blls lacaf/kr izfof"V ds ckn fuEufyf[kr vUr%LFkkfir fd;k tk,xk] vFkkZr~%&
¼2½ ¼3½
^^MkWDVj vkWQ esMhflu@ekLVj vkWQ
,eMh@,e ,l ¼,ukVkWeh½
ltZjh ¼,ukVkWeh½**
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh tc ;g ,eñ,eñ vk;q£oKku vkSj
vuqla/kku foHkkx] vEckyk esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa ds laca/k esa]
egk_f"k ekd±Ms'oj fo'ofo|ky;] ewYykuk vEckyk] gfj;k.kk }kjk twu] 2012
esa vFkok mlds i'pkr~ iznku dh xbZ gksA½
^^MkWDVj vkWQ esMhflu ¼jsfLijsfVª
,eMh ¼jsfLijsfVª esMhflu½
esMhflu½**
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh tc ;g ,eñ,eñ vk;q£oKku vkSj
vuqla/kku foHkkx] vEckyk esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa ds laca/k esa]
egk_f"k ekd±Ms'oj fo'ofo|ky;] ewYykuk vEckyk] gfj;k.kk }kjk twu] 2012
esa vFkok mlds i'pkr~ iznku dh xbZ gksA½
^^MkWDVj vkWQ esMhflu
,eMh ¼,usfLFkf'k;k½
¼,usfLFkf'k;k½**
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh tc ;g ,eñ,eñ vk;q£oKku vkSj
vuqla/kku foHkkx] vEckyk esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa ds laca/k esa]
egk_f"k ekd±Ms'oj fo'ofo|ky;] ewYykuk vEckyk] gfj;k.kk }kjk twu] 2012
esa vFkok mlds i'pkr~ iznku dh xbZ gksA½
^^MhIyksek bZu ,usfLFkf'k;k**
Mh ,
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh tc ;g ,eñ,eñ vk;q£oKku vkSj
vuqla/kku foHkkx] vEckyk esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa ds laca/k esa]
egk_f"k ekd±Ms'oj fo'ofo|ky;] ewYykuk vEckyk] gfj;k.kk }kjk twu] 2012
esa vFkok mlds i'pkr~ iznku dh xbZ gksA½
^^ekLVj vkWQ ltZjh ¼izlwfr vkSj L=h
,e ,l ¼vks ch th½
jksx½**
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh tc ;g ,eñ,eñ vk;q£oKku vkSj
vuqla/kku foHkkx] vEckyk esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa ds laca/k esa]
egk_f"k ekd±Ms'oj fo'ofo|ky;] ewYykuk vEckyk] gfj;k.kk }kjk twu] 2012
esa vFkok mlds i'pkr~ iznku dh xbZ gksA½
3208
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 6, 2013/ASHADHA 15, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
^^ekLVj vkWQ ltZjh ¼lkekU; ltZjh½**
,e ,l ¼lkekU; ltZjh½
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh tc ;g ,eñ,eñ vk;q£oKku vkSj
vuqla/kku foHkkx] vEckyk esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa ds laca/k esa]
egk_f"k ekd±Ms'oj fo'ofo|ky;] ewYykuk vEckyk] gfj;k.kk }kjk twu] 2012
esa vFkok mlds i'pkr~ iznku dh xbZ gksA½
^^MkWDVj vkWQ esMhflu@QekZdkWyksth**
,e Mh ¼QekZdkWyksth½
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh tc ;g ,eñ,eñ vk;q£oKku vkSj
vuqla/kku foHkkx] vEckyk esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa ds laca/k esa]
egk_f"k ekd±Ms'oj fo'ofo|ky;] ewYykuk vEckyk] gfj;k.kk }kjk twu] 2012
esa vFkok mlds i'pkr~ iznku dh xbZ gksA½
^^ekLVj vkWQ ltZjh ¼vkWFkksZisMhDl½**
,e ,l ¼vkWFkksZisMhDl½
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh tc ;g ,eñ,eñ vk;q£oKku vkSj
vuqla/kku foHkkx] vEckyk esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa ds laca/k esa]
egk_f"k ekd±Ms'oj fo'ofo|ky;] ewYykuk vEckyk] gfj;k.kk }kjk twu] 2012
esa vFkok mlds i'pkr~ iznku dh xbZ gksA½
^^MhIyksek bZu vkWFkksZisMhDl**
Mhñ vkWFkksZñ
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh tc ;g ,eñ,eñ vk;q£oKku vkSj
vuqla/kku foHkkx] vEckyk esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa ds laca/k esa]
egk_f"k ekd±Ms'oj fo'ofo|ky;] ewYykuk vEckyk] gfj;k.kk }kjk vizSy]
2011 esa vFkok mlds i'pkr~ iznku dh xbZ gksA½
^^MkWDVj vkWQ esMhflu¼cky
,e Mh ¼cky jksx foKku½
jksx foKku½**
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh tc ;g ,eñ,eñ vk;q£oKku vkSj
vuqla/kku foHkkx] vEckyk esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa ds laca/k esa]
egk_f"k ekd±Ms'oj fo'ofo|ky;] ewYykuk vEckyk] gfj;k.kk }kjk vizSy]
2011 esa vFkok mlds i'pkr~ iznku dh xbZ gksA½
^^MkWDVj vkWQ esMhflu
,eMh ¼ekbZdzksck;ksykWth½
¼ekbZdzksck;ksykWth½**
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh tc ;g ,eñ,eñ vk;q£oKku vkSj
vuqla/kku foHkkx] vEckyk esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa ds laca/k esa]
egk_f"k ekd±Ms'oj fo'ofo|ky;] ewYykuk vEckyk] gfj;k.kk }kjk twu] 2012
esa vFkok mlds i'pkr~ iznku dh xbZ gksA½
^^MkWDVj vkWQ esMhflu ¼tSo jlk;u½**
,e Mh ¼tSo jlk;u½
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh tc ;g ,eñ,eñ vk;q£oKku vkSj
vuqla/kku foHkkx] vEckyk esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa ds laca/k esa]
egk_f"k ekd±Ms'oj fo'ofo|ky;] ewYykuk vEckyk] gfj;k.kk }kjk twu] 2012
esa vFkok mlds i'pkr~ iznku dh xbZ gksA½
^^MkWDVj vkWQ esMhflu
,e Mh ¼QkWjsafld esMhflu½
¼QkWjsafld esMhflu½**
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh tc ;g ,eñ,eñ vk;q£oKku vkSj
vuqla/kku foHkkx] vEckyk esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa ds laca/k esa]
egk_f"k ekd±Ms'oj fo'ofo|ky;] ewYykuk vEckyk] gfj;k.kk }kjk twu] 2012
esa vFkok mlds i'pkr~ iznku dh xbZ gksA½
¼2½ ¼3½
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tqykbZ 6] 2013@vk"kk<+ 15] 1935
3209
^^MkWDVj vkWQ esMhflu
,e Mh ¼leqnk; esMhflu½
¼leqnk; esMhflu½**
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh tc ;g ,eñ,eñ vk;q£oKku vkSj
vuqla/kku foHkkx] vEckyk esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa ds laca/k esa]
egk_f"k ekd±Ms'oj fo'ofo|ky;] ewYykuk vEckyk] gfj;k.kk }kjk twu] 2012
esa vFkok mlds i'pkr~ iznku dh xbZ gksA½
^^MkWDVj vkWQ esMhflu
,eMh ¼jsfM;ksykWth@jsfM;ks funku½**
¼jsfM;ksykWth@jsfM;ks funku½**
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh tc ;g ,eñ,eñ vk;q£oKku vkSj
vuqla/kku foHkkx] vEckyk esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa ds laca/k esa]
egk_f"k ekd±Ms'oj fo'ofo|ky;] ewYykuk vEckyk] gfj;k.kk }kjk twu] 2012
esa vFkok mlds i'pkr~ iznku dh xbZ gksA½
lHkh ds fy, fVIi.kh% 1- LukrdksÙkj ikB~;Øe ds fy, Lohd`fr 5 o"kZ dh vf/kdre vof/k ds fy, gksxh] ftlds ckn bldh iqujh{kk dh tk,xhA
2- mi&/kkjk 4 esa visf{kr vuqlkj ekU;rk dks le; ij uohdj.k ugha djkus ds QyLo:i lacaf/kr LukrdksÙkj
ikB~;Øeksa esa fujiokn :i ls nkf[kyk cUn gks tk,xkA
[lañ ;wñ 12012@86@2012&,ebZ¼ih&II½]
vfurk f=ikBh] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 2nd January, 2013
S.O. 1234.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section(2) of the section 11 of the Indian Medical
Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956), the Central Government, after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby makes
the following further amendments in the First Schedule to the said Act, due to change of nomenclature of the qualification
namely:—
In the said Schedule—
(a)
against "Maharishi Markandeshwar University, Mullana-Ambala, Haryana" under heading 'Recognised Medical
Qualification' [hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the
heading 'Abbreviation for Registration' [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted,
namely;-—
¼2½ ¼3½
"Doctor of Medicine/Master of Surgery (Anatomy)" MD/MS (Anatomy)
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Maharishi Markandeshwar University, Mullana-Ambala, Haryana
in respect of students being trained at M.M. Institute of Medical
Sciences & Research, Ambala on or after June, 2012.)
"Doctor of Medicine (Respiratory Medicine)"
MD (Respiratory Medicine)"
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Maharishi Markandeshwar University, Mullana-Ambala, Haryana
in respect of students being trained at M.M. Institute of Medical
Sciences & Research, Ambala on or after June, 2012.)
"Doctor of Medicine (Anaesthesia)"
MD (Anaesthesia)
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Maharishi Markandeshwar University, Mullana-Ambala, Haryana
in respect of students being trained at M.M. Institute of Medical
Sciences & Research, Ambala on or after June, 2012.)
"Diploma in Anaesthesia"
DA
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Maharishi Markandeshwar University, Mullana-Ambala, Haryana
in respect of students being trained at M.M. Institute of Medical
Sciences & Research, Ambala on or after June, 2012.)
¼2½ ¼3½
3210
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 6, 2013/ASHADHA 15, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
"Master of Surgery (Obstatrics & Gynaecology)"
MS (OBG)
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Maharishi Markandeshwar University, Mullana-Ambala, Haryana
in respect of students being trained at M.M. Institute of Medical
Sciences & Research, Ambala on or after June, 2012.)
"Master of Surgery (General Surgery)"
MS (General Surgery)
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Maharishi Markandeshwar University, Mullana-Ambala, Haryana
in respect of students being trained at M.M. Institute of Medical
Sciences & Research, Ambala on or after June, 2012.)
"Doctor of Medicine (Pharmacology)"
MD (Pharmacology)
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Maharishi Markandeshwar University, Mullana-Ambala, Haryana
in respect of students being trained at M.M. Institute of Medical
Sciences & Research, Ambala on or after June, 2012.)
"Master of Surgery (Orthopaedics)"
MS (Orthopaedics)
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Maharishi Markandeshwar University, Mullana-Ambala, Haryana
in respect of students being trained at M.M. Institute of Medical
Sciences & Research, Ambala on or after June, 2012.)
"Diploma in (Orthopaedics)"
D. Ortho.
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Maharishi Markandeshwar University, Mullana-Ambala, Haryana
in respect of students being trained at M.M. Institute of Medical
Sciences & Research, Ambala on or after April, 2011.)
"Doctor of Medicine (Paediatrics)"
MD (Paediatrics)
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Maharishi Markandeshwar University, Mullana-Ambala, Haryana
in respect of students being trained at M.M. Institute of Medical
Sciences & Research, Ambala on or after April, 2011.)
"Doctor of Medicine (Microbiology)"
MD (Microbiology)
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Maharishi Markandeshwar University, Mullana-Ambala, Haryana
in respect of students being trained at M.M. Institute of Medical
Sciences & Research, Ambala on or after June, 2012.)
"Doctor of Medicine (Biochemistry)"
MD (Biochemistry)
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Maharishi Markandeshwar University, Mullana-Ambala, Haryana
in respect of students being trained at M.M. Institute of Medical
Sciences & Research, Ambala on or after June, 2012.)
"Doctor of Medicine (Forensic Medicine)"
MD (Forensic Medicine)
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Maharishi Markandeshwar University, Mullana-Ambala, Haryana
in respect of students being trained at M.M. Institute of Medical
Sciences & Research, Ambala on or after June, 2012.)
¼2½ ¼3½
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tqykbZ 6] 2013@vk"kk<+ 15] 1935
3211
"Doctor of Medicine (Community Medicine)"
MD (Community Medicine)
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Maharishi Markandeshwar University, Mullana-Ambala, Haryana
in respect of students being trained at M.M. Institute of Medical
Sciences & Research, Ambala on or after June, 2012.)
"Doctor of Medicine (Radiology/Radiodiagnosis)"
MD (Radiology/Radiodiagnosis)
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Maharishi Markandeshwar University, Mullana-Ambala, Haryana
in respect of students being trained at M.M. Institute of Medical
Sciences & Research, Ambala on or after June, 2012.)
Note to all: 1. The recognition so granted to a Postgraduate Course shall be for a maximum period of 5 years, upon
which it shall have to be renewed.
2.
Failure to seek timely renewal of recognition as required in sub-clause-4 shall invariably result in stoppage
of admissions to the concerned Postgraduate Course.
[No.U.12012/86/2012-ME(P-II)]
ANITA TRIPATHI, Under Secy.
ubZ fnYyh] 23 tuojh] 2013
dkñvkñ 1235-
—Hkkjrh; fpfdRlk ifj"kn vf/kfu;e] 1956 ¼1956 dk 102½ dh /kkjk 11 dh mi&/kkjk ¼2½ }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk
iz;ksx djrs gq, dsUnzh; ljdkj] Hkkjrh; fpfdRlk ifj"kn ls ijke'kZ djds ,rn}kjk mDr vf/kfu;e dh izFke vuqlwph esa fuEufyf[kr vkSj
la'kks/ku djrh gSa uker%
^^egkjk"Vª LokLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky; ] ukfld ds ckn vkSj ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk** 'kh"kZd [blds ckn dkye ¼2½ esa ;Fkk
lanfHkZr] ds varxZr vfUre izfof"V** ds lkeus ^^iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr :i** [blds ckn dkye ¼3½ esa ;Fkk lanfHkZr] 'kh"kZd ds
varxZr mlls lacaf/kr izfof"V esa fuEUkfyf[kr dks varfoZ"V fd;k tk,xk] uker%
¼2½ ¼3½
^^MkWDVj vkWQ esMhflu ¼ekbZdzksck;ksykWth½**
,eñMhñ ¼ekbZdzksck;ksykWth½
¼;g twu 2012 esa vFkok mlds ckn egkjk"Vª vk;qfoZKku ,oa vuqla/kku laLFkku]
ykrwj] egkjk"Vª esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;kas ds laca/k esa egkjk"Vª LokLF;
foKku fo'ofo|ky; ] ukfld }kjk Lohd`r fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk
vgrkZ gksxh½A
lHkh ds laca/k esa uksV% 1- fdlh LukRdksrj ikB~;dze ds fy, iznr ,slh ekU;rk 5 o"kksZa dh vf/kdre vof/k ds fy, gksxh] ftlds mijkar bldk
uohuhdj.k djokuk iMsxkA
2- mi&[kaM 4 esa ;Fkkisf{kr ekU;rk ds le;iwoZd uohuhdj.k laca/kh vis{kk esa vQly jgus dk vfuok;Zr% ifj.kke lacaf/
kr LukRdksrj ikB~;dze esa nkf[kyk can djus ds :i esa fudysxkA
[lañ ;wñ 12012@4@2013&,ebZ ¼ih&II½]
vuhrk f=ikBh] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 23rd January, 2013
S.O. 1235.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section(2) of the section 11 of the Indian Medical
Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956), the Central Government, after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby makes
the following further amendments in the First Schedule to the said Act, namely:—
In the said Schedule—
(a)
against "Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, Nashik" the under heading 'Recognised Medical
Qualification' [hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the
¼2½ ¼3½
3212
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 6, 2013/ASHADHA 15, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
heading 'Abbreviation for Registration' [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted,
namely;—
¼2½ ¼3½
"Doctor of Medicine (Microbiology)"
MD (Microbiology)
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, Nashik in respect of
students being trained at Maharasthra Institute of Medical Sciences
& Research, Latur, Maharashtra on or after June, 2012.)
Note to all: 1. The recognition so granted to a Postgraduate Course shall be for a maximum period of 5 years, upon
which it shall have to be renewed.
2. Failure to seek timely renewal of recognition as required in sub-clause-4 shall invariably result in
stoppage of admissions to the concerned Postgraduate Course.
[No.U.12012/4/2013-ME(P-II)]
ANITA TRIPATHI, Under Secy.
ubZ fnYyh] 23 tuojh] 2013
dkñvkñ 1236-
—Hkkjrh; fpfdRlk ifj"kn vf/kfu;e] 1956 ¼1956 dk 102½ dh /kkjk 11 dh mi /kkjk ¼2½ }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx
djrs gq, dsUnzh; ljdkj] Hkkjrh; fpfdRlk ifj"kn~ ls ijke'kZ djds ,rn}kjk mDr vf/kfu;e dh izFke vuqlwph esa fuEufyf[kr vkSj la'kks/ku
djrh gS
uker%
^^if'pe caxky LokLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky; ] dksydkrk** ds ckn vkSj ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk** 'kh"kZd [blds ckn dkye ¼2½
esa ;Fkk lanfHkZr ] ^^varxZr izfof"V** ds lkeus ^^iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr :i** [blds ckn dkye ¼3½ esa ;Fkk lanfHkZr ] 'kh"kZd ds varxZr
mlls lacaf/kr izfof"V esa fufEUkfyf[kr dks varfoZ"V fd;k tk,xk] uker%
¼2½ ¼3½
^^MkWDVj vkWQ esMhflu ¼isMh;kVªhDl½**
,eñMhñ ¼isMh;kVªhDl½
¼;g ebZ] 2011 esa vFkok mlds ckn dydÙkk us'kuy esMhdy dkWyst]
dksydkrk esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo/kkfFkZ;ks ds laca/k esa if'pe caxky LokLF;
foKku fo'ofo|ky;] dksydkrk }kjk Lohd`r fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk
vgrkZ gksxh½A
lHkh ds laca/k esa uksV%
1- fdlh LukRdksrj ikB~;Øe ds fy, iznr~r ,slh ekU;rk 5 o"kksZa dh vf/kdre vof/k ds fy, gksxh] ftlds mijkar
bldk uohuhdj.k djokuk iM+sxkA
2- mi&[kaM 4 esa ;Fkkisf{kr ekU;rk ds le;iwoZd uohuhdj.k laca/kh vis{kk esa vQly jgus dk vfuok;Zr ifj.kke
lacaf/kr LukRdksrj ikB~;Øe esa nkf[kyk can djus ds :i esa fudysxkA
[lañ ;wñ 12012@1@2013&,ebZ ¼ih&II½]
vuhrk f=ikBh] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 23rd January, 2013
S.O. 1236.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section(2) of the Section 11 of the Indian Medical
Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956), the Central Government, after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby makes
the following further amendments in the First Schedule to the said Act, namely:—
In the said Schedule—
(a)
against "West Bengal University of Health Sciences, Kolkata" under the heading 'Recognised Medical
Qualification' [hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the
heading 'Abbreviation for Registration' [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted,
namely:—
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tqykbZ 6] 2013@vk"kk<+ 15] 1935
3213
"Doctor of Medicine (Paediatrics)"
MD (Paediatrics)
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
"West Bengal University of Health Sciences, Kolkata" in respect
of students being trained at Calcutta National Medical College,
Kolkata on or after May, 2011.)
Note to all: 1. The recognition so granted to a Postgraduate Course shall be for a maximum period of 5 years, upon
which it shall have to be renewed.
2. Failure to seek timely renewal of recognition as required in sub-clause 4 shall invariably result in
stoppage of admissions to the concerned Postgraduate Course.
[No.U.12012/1/2013-ME(P-II)]
ANITA TRIPATHI, Under Secy.
ubZ fnYyh] 12 Qjojh] 2013
dkñvkñ 1237-
—Hkkjrh; fpfdRlk ifj"kn vf/kfu;e] 1956 ¼1956 dk 102½ dh /kkjk 11 dh mi /kkjk ¼2½ }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx
djrs gq, dsUnz ljdkj] Hkkjrh; fpfdRlk ifj"kn ls ijke'kZ djds ,rn}kjk mDr vf/kfu;e dh izFke vuqlwph esa fuEufyf[kr vkSj
la'kks/ku djrh g® uker%
mDr izFke vuqlwph esa ^^ekU;rk izkIr fpfdRlk vgrkZ** 'kh"kZd [blds ckn dkye ¼2½ esa ] ds varxZr ^^iafMr chñ Mhñ 'kekZ LokLF;
foKku fo'ofo|ky;] jksgrd] gfj;k.kk ^^ds lkeus ^^iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr :i** [blds ckn dkye ¼3½ esa] 'kh"kZd ds varxZr fuEufyf[kr
dks varfoZ"V fd;k tk,xk] uker%
¼2½ ¼3½
^^cspyj vkWQ esMhflu vkSj cSpyj vkWQ ltZjh**
,eñchñchñ,lñ
¼;g uoEcj] 2012 esa vFkok mlds ckn iafMr chñ Mhñ 'kekZ ihthvkbZ,e,l]
jksgrd] gfj;k.kk esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa ds laca/k esa iafMr- ch-Mh-
'kekZ LokLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky;]jksgrd] gfj;k.kk }kjk Lohd`r fd, tkus ij
ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgrkZ gksxh½A
^^cSpyj vkWQ esMhflu vkSj cSpyj vkWQ ltZjh**
,e-ch-ch-,l
¼;g uoEcj] 2012 esa vFkok mlds ckn] egkjktk vxzlsu esMhdy dkWyst]
vxzksgk] fglkj] gfj;k.kk esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa ds laca/k esa iafMr
ch-Mh- 'kekZ LokLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky;] jksgrd] gfj;k.kk }kjk Lohd`r fd,
tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgrkZ gksxh½A
[lañ;wñ 12012@83@2012&,ebZ ¼ih&II½]
vuhrk f=ikBh] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 12th February, 2013
S.O. 1237.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of the Section 11 of the Indian Medical
Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956), the Central Government, after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby makes
the following further amendments due to change of affiliating university in the First Schedule to the said Act, namely:—
In the said First Schedule against "Pt. B.D. Sharma University of Health Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana" under the
heading 'Recognized Medical Qualification' [in column (2)] before the first entry and entry relating thereto the heading
'Abbreviation for Registration" [in column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely:—
¼2½ ¼3½
Bachelor of Medicine and
M.B.B.S.
Bachelor of Surgery
(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted by
Pt. B.D. Sharma University of Health Sciences Rohtak, Haryana in
respect of students being trained at Pt. B.D. Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak
Haryana on or after November, 2012.)
Bachelor of Medicine and
M.B.B.S.
¼2½ ¼3½
3214
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 6, 2013/ASHADHA 15, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Bachelor of Surgery
(This shall be recognized medical qualification when granted by
Pt. B.D. Sharma University of Health Sciences Rohtak, Haryana in
respect of students being trained at Maharaja Agarsen Medical
College, Agroha, Hissar, Haryana on or after November, 2012.
[No. U.12012/83/2012-ME(P-II)]
ANITA TRIPATHI, Under Secy.
ubZ fnYyh] 22 Qjojh] 2013
dk-vk- 1238-
—dsUnzh; ljdkj Hkkjrh; fpfdRlk ifj"kn vf/kfu;e] 1956 ¼1956 dk 102½ dh /kkjk 11 dh mi&/kkjk ¼2½ }kjk iznÙk
'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, Hkkjrh; fpfdRlk ifj"kn ls ijke'kZ djus ds ckn] ,rn~}kjk fo'ofo|ky; ds uke esa cnyko ds dkj.k mDr vf/kfu;e
dh igyh vuqlwph esa fuEufyf[kr vkSj la'kks/ku djrh gSs] vFkkZr~%
mDr izFke vuqlwph esaµ
¼d½
^^egkjk"Vª LokLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky;] ukfld** ds lkeus 'kh"kZd ^ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk* [vc ds ckn LraHk ¼2½ ds
:i esa lanfHkZr] ds varxZr vafre izfof"V vkSj mlls lacaf/kr izfof"V ds ckn 'kh"kZd ^iathdj.k ds fy, lais{k.k* [vc ds ckn
LraHk ¼3½ ds :i esa lanfHkZr] ds varxZr fuEufyf[kr var% LFkkfir fd;k tk,xk] vFkkZr~%µ
¼2½ ¼3½
^^ekLVj vkWQ ltZjh** ¼vkWFkksZisMhDl½
,e ,l ¼vkWFkksisMhDl½
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ;fn ;g ,u- ds- ih- lkYos vk;qfoZKku
laLFkku ukxiqj] egkjk"Vª esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa ds laca/k esa egkjk"Vª
LokLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky;] ukfld] }kjk twu 2012 esa vFkok mlds i'pkr~
iznku dh xbZ½A
¼[k½ ^^mRdy fo'ofo|ky;] vksMhlk** ds lkeus 'kh"kZd ^ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk ¼vc ds ckn LraHk ¼2½ ds :i esa lanfHkZr½ ds
varxZr vafre izfof"V vkSj mlls lacaf/kr izfof"V ds ckn 'kh"kZd ^iathdj.k ds fy, lais{k.k* ¼vc ds ckn LraHk ¼3½ ds :i esa
lanfHkZr½ ds varxZr fuEufyf[kr var% LFkkfir fd;k tk,xk] vFkkZr~%µ
¼2½ ¼3½
^^MkDVj vkWQ esMhflu
,e Mh ¼ekbØksck;ksykth½
¼ekbØksck;ksykth½**
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ;fn ;g ,l- lh- ch- esMhdy
dkWyst] dVd] vksMhlk esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa ds laca/k esa mRdy
fo'ofo|ky;] vksMhlk] }kjk ebZ] 2012 esa vFkok mlds i'pkr~ iznku dh xbZ½A
¼x½ ^^foØe fo'ofo|ky;] mTtSu] e/; izns'k** ds lkeus 'kh"kZd ^ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk* [vc ds ckn LraHk ¼2½ ds :i esa
lanfHkZr] ds varxZr vafre izfof"V vkSj mlls lacaf/kr izfof"V ds ckn 'kh"kZd ^iathdj.k ds fy, lais{k.k* [vc ds ckn LraHk ¼3½ ds
:i esa lanfHkZr] ds varxZr fuEufyf[kr var% LFkkfir fd;k tk,xk] vFkkZr~%µ
¼2½ ¼3½
^^ekLVj vkWQ ltZjh ¼izlwfr ,oa L=h jksx½**
,e ,l ¼vks ch th½
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ;fn ;g jDleuhcsu nhipan xnhZ
esMhdy dkWyst] mTtSu] e/; izns'k esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa ds
laca/k esa] foØe fo'ofo|ky;] mTtSu] e/; izns'k] }kjk flrEcj] 2012 esa vFkok
mlds i'pkr~ iznku dh xbZ½A
^^MkWDVj vkWQ esMhflu ¼fofdj.k@funku½**
,e Mh ¼[email protected] funku½
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ;fn ;g jDleuhcsu nhipan xnhZ
esMhdy dkWyst] mTtSu] e/; izns'k esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa ds
laca/k esa] foØe fo'ofo|ky;] mTtSu] e/; izns'k] }kjk flrEcj 2012 esa vFkok
mlds i'pkr~ iznku dh xbZ½A
¼2½
¼3½
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tqykbZ 6] 2013@vk"kk<+ 15] 1935
3215
^^ekLVj vkWQ ltZjh ¼us= jksx foKku½**
,e ,l ¼us= jksx foKku½
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ;fn ;g jDleuhcsu nhipan xnhZ
esMhdy dkWyst] mTtSu] e/; izns'k esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa ds
laca/k esa] foØe fo'ofo|ky;] mTtSu] e/; izns'k] }kjk flrEcj] 2012 esa vFkok
mlds i'pkr~ iznku dh xbZ½A
^^MkWDVj vkWQ esMhflu ¼ekbZØksck;kWyksth½+**
,e Mh ¼ekbØksck;kWyksth½
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ;fn ;g jDleuhcsu nhipan xnhZ
esMhdy dkWyst] mTtSu] e/; izns'k esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa ds
laca/k esa] foØe fo'ofo|ky;] mTtSu] e/; izns'k] }kjk flrEcj] 2012 esa vFkok
mlds i'pkr~ iznku dh xbZ½A
^^MkDVj vkWQ esMhflu ¼QkekZdkWyksth½**
,e Mh ¼QkekZdkWyksth½
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ;fn ;g jDleuhcsu nhipan xnhZ
esMhdy dkWyst] mTtSu] e/; izns'k esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa ds
laca/k esa] foØe fo'ofo|ky;] mTtSu] e/; izns'k] }kjk flrEcj] 2012 esa vFkok
mlds i'pkr~ iznku dh xbZ½A
^^MkDVj vkWQ esMhflu ¼iSFkksykWth½**
,e Mh ¼iSFkksykWth½
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ;fn ;g jDleuhcsu nhipan xnhZ
esMhdy dkWyst] mTtSu] e/; izns'k esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa ds
laca/k esa] foØe fo'ofo|ky;] mTtSu] e/; izns'k] }kjk flrEcj] 2012 esa vFkok
mlds i'pkr~ iznku dh xbZ½A
^^MkDVj vkWQ esMhflu ¼peZ jksx
,e Mh ¼Mh oh ,y½
foKku] jfrt jksx foKku ,oa dq"B jksx½**
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ;fn ;g jDleuhcsu nhipan xnhZ
esMhdy dkWyst] mTtSu] e/; izns'k esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa ds
laca/k esa] foØe fo'ofo|ky;] mTtSu] e/; izns'k] }kjk flrEcj] 2012 esa vFkok
mlds i'pkr~ iznku dh xbZ½A
^^MkDVj vkWQ esMhflu ¼laKkgj.k foKku½**
,e Mh ¼laKkgj.k foKku½
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ;fn ;g jDleuhcsu nhipan xnhZ
esMhdy dkWyst] mTtSu] e/; izns'k esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa ds
laca/k esa] foØe fo'ofo|ky;] mTtSu] e/; izns'k] }kjk flrEcj] 2012 esa vFkok
mlds i'pkr~ iznku dh xbZ½A
^^ekLVj vkWQ ltZjh ¼vkWVks jkbZuks ySfjaxksykWth½
,e ,l ¼dku] ukd] xyk½
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ;fn ;g jDleuhcsu nhipan xnhZ
esMhdy dkWyst] mTtSu] e/; izns'k esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa ds
laca/k esa] foØe fo'ofo|ky;] mTtSu] e/; izns'k] }kjk flrEcj] 2012 esa vFkok
mlds i'pkr~ iznku dh xbZ½A
^^MkDVj vkWQ esMhflu ¼Ropk jksx foKku]
,e Mh ¼Mh oh ,y½
;kSu jksx foKku] ,oa dq"B jksx½**
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ;fn ;g vle esMhdy dkWyst]
Mhc#x<+] vle esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa ds laca/k esa] Jhear 'kadjnso
LokLF; foKku fo'ofo|ky;] xqokgVh] vle] }kjk o"kZ 2010 esa vFkok mlds
i'pkr~ iznku dh xbZ½
¼2½ ¼3½
3216
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 6, 2013/ASHADHA 15, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
^^MkDVj vkWQ esMhflu
,e Mh ¼eu% fpfdRlk foKku½
¼eu%fpfdRlk foKku½**
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ;fn ;g jDleuhcsu nhipan xnhZ
esMhdy dkWyst] mTtSu] e/; izns'k esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa ds
laca/k esa] foØe fo'ofo|ky;] mTtSu] e/; izns'k] }kjk flrEcj 2012 esa vFkok
mlds i'pkr~ iznku dh xbZ½A
^^MkWDVj vkWQ esMhflu ¼f'k'kq jksx foKku½**
,e Mh ¼f'k'kq jksx foKku½
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ;fn ;g jDleuhcsu nhipan xnhZ
esMhdy dkWyst] mTtSu] e/; izns'k esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa ds
laca/k esa] foØe fo'ofo|ky;] mTtSu] e/; izns'k] }kjk flrEcj 2012 esa vFkok
mlds i'pkr~ iznku dh xbZ½A
^^MkWDVj vkWQ esMhflu ¼lkeqnkf;d fpfdRlk½**
,e Mh ¼lkeqnkf;d fpfdRlk½
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ;fn ;g jDleuhcsu nhipan xnhZ
esMhdy dkWyst] mTtSu] e/; izns'k esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa ds
laca/k esa] foØe fo'ofo|ky;] mTtSu] e/; izns'k] }kjk flrEcj 2012 esa vFkok
mlds i'pkr~ iznku dh xbZ½A
^^MkWDVj vkWQ esMhflu ¼Qs¶Mksa laca/kh fpfdRlk½**
,e Mh ¼Qs¶Mksa laca/kh fpfdRlk½ ¼;g ,d ekU;rk izkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh
;fn ;g jDleuhcsu nhipan xnhZ esMhdy dkWyst] mTtSu] e/; izns'k esa izf'kf{kr
fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa ds laca/k esa] foØe fo'ofo|ky;] mTtSu] e/; izns'k]
}kjk flrEcj 2012 esa vFkok mlds i'pkr~ iznku dh xbZ½A
^^MkWDVj vkWQ esMhflu ¼lkekU; fpfdRlk½**
,e Mh ¼lkekU; fpfdRlk½
¼;g ,d ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh ;fn ;g jDleuhcsu nhipan xnhZ
esMhdy dkWyst] mTtSu] e/; izns'k esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa ds
laca/k esa] foØe fo'ofo|ky;] mTtSu] e/; izns'k] }kjk flrEcj 2012 esa vFkok
mlds i'pkr~ iznku dh xbZ½A
lHkh ds fy, fVIi.kh%
1- LukrdksÙkj ikB~;de ds fy, Lohd`r ekU;rk 5 o"kZ dh vf/kdre vof/k ds fy, gksxh ftlds ckn bldh iqujh{kk
dh tk,xhA
2- mi&/kkjk ¼4½ esa visf{kr ekU;rk dks le; ij uohdj.k ugha djkus ds QyLo:i lacaf/kr LukrdksÙkj ikB~;Øeksa esa
fujiokn :i ls nkf[kyk can gks tk,xkA
[lañ ;wñ&12012@16@2013&,ebZ ¼ih&II½]
vuhrk f=ikBh] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 22nd February, 2013
S.O. 1238.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of the Section 11 of the Indian Medical
Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956), the Central Government, after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby makes
the following further amendments in the First Schedule to the said Act, namely:—
In the said Schedule—
(a)
against "Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, Nashik" under the heading 'Recognised Medical
Qualification' [hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the
heading 'Abbreviation for Registration' [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted,
namely:—
¼2½ ¼3½
"Master of Surgery (Orthopaedics)"
MS (Orthopaedics)
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Maharashtra Univesity of Health Sciences, Nashik in respect of
¼2½ ¼3½
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tqykbZ 6] 2013@vk"kk<+ 15] 1935
3217
students being trained at N.K.P. Salve Institute of Medical Sciences,
Nagpur, Maharashtra on or after June, 2012.)
(b)
against "Utkal University, Orissa" under the heading "Recognised Medical Qualification” [hereinafter referred
to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading 'Abbreviation for Registration'
[hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be insered, namely:—
¼2½ ¼3½
"Doctor of Medicine (Microbiology)"
MD (Microbiology)
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Utkal University, Orissa in respect of students being trained at
S.C.B. Medical College, Cuttack, Orissa on or after May, 2012.)
(c)
against "Vikram University, Ujjain Madhya Pradesh" under the heading 'Recognised Medical Qualification'
[hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading
'Abbreviation for Registration' [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be insered,
namely:—
¼2½ ¼3½
"Master of Surgery (Obstetrics & Gynaecology)"
MD (OBG)
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Vikram Univesity, Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh in respect of the students
being trained at Ruxmaniben Deepchand Gardi Medical College,
Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh on or after September, 2012.)
"Doctor of Medicine (Radiology/Radio Diagnosis)" MD (Radiology/Radio Diagnosis)
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Vikram University, Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh in respect of the
students being trained at Ruxmaniben Deepchand Gardi Medical
College, Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh on or after September, 2012.)
"Master of Surgery (Ophthalmology)"
MS (Ophthalmology)
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Vikram Univesity, Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh in respect of the students
being trained at Ruxmaniben Deepchand Gardi Medical College,
Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh on or after September, 2012.)
"Doctor of Medicine (Microbiology)"
MD (Microbiology)
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Vikram University, Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh in respect of the
students being trained at Ruxmaniben Deepchand Gardi Medical
College, Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh on or after September, 2012.)
"Doctor of Medicine (Pharmacology)"
MD (Pharmacology)
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Vikram University, Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh in respect of the
students being trained at Ruxmaniben Deepchand Gardi Medical
College, Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh on or after September, 2012.)
"Doctor of Medicine (Pathology)"
MD (Pathology)
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Vikram University, Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh in respect of the
students being trained at Ruxmaniben Deepchand Gardi Medical
College, Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh on or after September, 2012.)
"Doctor of Medicine (Dermatology, Venerology
MD (DVL)
and Leprosy)"
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Vikram University, Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh in respect of the
students being trained at Ruxmaniben Deepchand Gardi Medical
College, Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh on or after September, 2012.)
¼2½ ¼3½
3218
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 6, 2013/ASHADHA 15, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
"Doctor of Medicine (Anaesthesia)"
MD (Anaesthesia)
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Vikram University, Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh in respect of the
students being trained at Ruxmaniben Deepchand Gardi Medical
College, Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh on or after September, 2012.)
"Master of Surgery (Oto-Rhino-Laryngology)"
MS (ENT)
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Vikram University, Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh in respect of the
students being trained at Ruxmaniben Deepchand Gardi Medical
College, Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh on or after September, 2012.)
“Doctor of Medicine (Psychiatry)"
MD (Psychiatry)
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Vikram University, Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh in respect of the
students being trained at Ruxmaniben Deepchand Gardi Medical
College, Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh on or after September, 2012.)
"Doctor of Medicine (Paediatrics)"
MD (Paediatrics)
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Vikram University, Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh in respect of the
students being trained at Ruxmaniben Deepchand Gardi Medical
College, Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh on or after September, 2012.)
"Doctor of Medicine (Community Medicine)"
MD (Community Medicine)
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Vikram University, Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh in respect of the
students being trained at Ruxmaniben Deepchand Gardi Medical
College, Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh on or after September, 2012.)
"Doctor of Medicine (Pulmonary Medicine)"
MD (Pulmonary Medicine)
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Vikram University, Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh in respect of the
students being trained at Ruxmaniben Deepchand Gardi Medical
College, Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh on or after September, 2012.)
"Doctor of Medicine (General Medicine)"
MD (General Medicine)
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Vikram University, Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh in respect of the
students being trained at Ruxmaniben Deepchand Gardi Medical
College, Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh on or after September, 2012.)
Note to all: 1. The recognition so granted to a Postgraduate Course shall be for a maximum period of 5 years, upon
which it shall have to be renewed.
2.
Failure to seek timely renewal of recognition as required in sub-clause-4 shall invariably result in stoppage
of admissions to the concerned Postgraduate Course.
[No. U-12012/16/2013-ME(P-II)]
ANITA TRIPATHI, Under Secy.
ubZ fnYyh] 8 ekpZ] 2013
dkñvkñ 1239-
— Hkkjrh; fpfdRlk ifj"kn~ vf/kfu;e] 1956 ¼1956 dk 102½ dh /kkjk 11 dh mi /kkjk ¼2½ }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk
iz;ksx djrs gq, dsUnzh; ljdkj] Hkkjrh; fpfdRlk ifj"kn~ ls ijke'kZ djds ,rn~}kjk mDr vf/kfu;e dh izFke vuqlwph esa fuEufyf[kr vkSj
la'kks/ku djrh gSA
¼2½ ¼3½
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tqykbZ 6] 2013@vk"kk<+ 15] 1935
3219
mDr izFke vuqlwph esa ^^ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk** 'kh"kZd [blds ckn dkye ¼2½ esa ]] ds varxZr** ^^mRdy fo'ofo|ky;] vksMhlk ds
lkeus ^^iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr :i** [blds ckn dkye ¼3½ esa ] 'kh"kZd ds varxZr fuEufyf[kr dks varfoZ"V fd;k tk,xk] uker%—
¼2½ ¼3½
^^cSpyj vkWQ esMhflu vkSj cSpyj vkWQ ltZjh**
,e-ch-ch-,l-
¼;g izfro"kZ 100 ,eñchñchñ,l - Nk=ksa ds okf"kZd izos'k lfgr vxLr] 2012 esa
vFkok mlds ckn dfyaxk vk;qfoZKku laLFkku] Hkqous'oj] vksMhlk esa izf'kf{kr
fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa ds laca/k esa mRdy fo'ofo|ky;] vksMhlk }kjk Lohd`r
fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh½A
[lañ ;wñ 12012@76@2004&,eñbZñ ¼ih&II½]
vfurk f=ikBh] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 8th March, 2013
S.O. 1239.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of the Section 11 of the Indian Medical
Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956), the Central Government, after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby makes
the following further amendments in the First Schedule to the said Act.
In the said First Schedule after “Utkal University, Orissa” and under the heading 'Recognised Medical Qualifi-
cation' [hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading/Abbrevia-
tion for Registration' [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely:—
¼2½ ¼3½
"Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery"
MBBS
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Utkal University, Orissa in respect of students being trained at
Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Orissa with
annual intake of 100 MBBS students on or after August, 2012.)
[No. U. 12012/76/2004-ME (P-II)]
ANITA TRIPATHI, Under Secy.
ubZ fnYyh] 11 ekpZ] 2013
dkñvkñ 1240-
— Hkkjrh; fpfdRlk ifj"kn~ vf/kfu;e] 1956 ¼1956 dk 102½ dh /kkjk 11 dh mi&/kkjk ¼2½ }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk
iz;ksx djrs gq, dsUnzh; ljdkj] Hkkjrh; fpfdRlk ifj"kn~ ls ijke'kZ djds ,rn~}kjk mDr vf/kfu;e dh izFke vuqlwph esa fuEufyf[kr vkSj
la'kks/ku djrh gS] uker% %—
mDr izFke vuqlwph esa ^^ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk** 'kh"kZd [blds ckn dkye ¼2½ esa ] ds varxZr ^^rhFkZdj egkohj fo'ofo|ky;]
eqjknkckn] mÙkj izns'k** ds lkeus ^^iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr :i** [blds ckn dkye ¼3½ esa ] 'kh"kZd ds varxZr fuEufyf[kr dks varfoZ"V
fd;k tk,xk] uker %—
¼2½ ¼3½
^^cSpyj vkWQ esMhflu vkSj cSpyj vkWQ ltZjh**
,eñchñchñ,lñ
¼;g izfro"kZ 100 ,eñchñchñ,lñ Nk=ksa ds okf"kZd izos'k lfgr fnlEcj] 2012 esa
vFkok mlds ckn rhFkZdj egkohj esMhdy dkWyst ,aM fjlpZ lasVj] eqjknkckn]
mÙkj izns'k esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa ds laca/k esa rhFkZdj egkohj
fo'ofo|ky;] eqjknkckn] mÙkj izns'k }kjk Lohd`r fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr
fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh½A
[lañ ;wñ 12012@500@2007&,eñbZñ ¼ih&II½]
vfurk f=ikBh] voj lfpo
3220
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 6, 2013/ASHADHA 15, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
New Delhi, the 11th March, 2013
S.O. 1240.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of the Section 11 of the Indian Medical
Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956), the Central Government, after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby makes
the following further amendments in the First Schedule to the said Act.
In the said First Schedule after "Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh" and under the heading
'Recognised Medical Qualification' [hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto
under the heading 'Abbreviation for Registration' [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted,
namely:—
¼2½ ¼3½
"Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery"
MBBS
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
"Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh" in
respect of students being trained at Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical
College & Research Centre, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh with annual
intake of 100 MBBS students on or after December, 2012.)—
[No.U. 12012/500/2007-ME(P-II)]
ANITA TRIPATHI, Under Secy.
ubZ fnYyh] 19 ekpZ] 2013
dkñvkñ 1241-
—Hkkjrh; fpfdRlk ifj"kn vf/kfu;e] 1956 ¼1956 dk 102½ dh /kkjk 11 dh mi /kkjk ¼2½ }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx
djrs gq, dsUnzh; ljdkj] Hkkjrh; fpfdRlk ifj"kn ls ijke'kZ djds ,rn~}kjk mDr vf/kfu;e dh izFke vuqlwph esa fuEufyf[kr vkSj
la'kks/ku djrh gSa A
mDr izFke vuqlwph esa ^^mRdy fo'ofo|ky; vksMhlk** ds ckn vkSj ^^ekU;rk izkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk** 'kh"kZd ¼blds ckn dkye ¼2½
esa ;Fkk lanfHkZr½ ds varxZr** vafre lkeus ^^iathdj.k ds fy, laf{kIr :i** [blds ckn dkye ¼3½ esa ;Fkk lanfHkZr] 'kh"kZd ds varxZr mlls
lacaf/kr izfof"V esa fuEufyf[kr dks varfoZ"V fd;k tk,xk] uker%—
¼2½ ¼3½
^^cSpyj vkWQ esMhflu vkSj cSpyj vkWQ ltZjh**
,eñchñchñ,lñ
¼;g izfro"kZ 100 ,eñchñchñ,l Nk=ksa ds okf"kZd izos'k lfgr vxLr] 2012 esa
vFkok mlds ckn vk;qfoZKku laLFkku vkSj ,l ;w ,e vLirky] Hkqous'oj]
vksMhlk esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|kfFkZ;ksa ds laca/k esa mRdy fo'ofo|ky;]
vksMhlk }kjk Lohd`r fd, tkus ij ekU;rkizkIr fpfdRlk vgZrk gksxh½A
[lañ ;wñ 12012@84@2004&,eñbZñ ¼ih&II½]
vfurk f=ikBh] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 19th March, 2013
S.O. 1241.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of the Section 11 of the Indian Medical
Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956), the Central Government, after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby makes
the following further amendments in the First Schedule to the said Act.
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tqykbZ 6] 2013@vk"kk<+ 15] 1935
3221
In the said First Schedule after "Utkal University, Orissa" and under the heading 'Recognised Medical Qualification'
[hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading 'Abbreviation for
Registration' [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely:—
¼2½ ¼3½
"Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery"
MBBS
(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by
Utkal University, Orissa in respect of students being trained at
Institute of Medical Sciences & SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar,
Orissa with annual intake of 100 MBBS students on or after August,
2012.
[No. U.12012/84/2004-ME(P-II)]
ANITA TRIPATHI, Under Secy.
Rule, 1976, the Central Government hereby notifies
following offices of the Office of Chief Postmaster
General, Kerala Circle. Thiruvananthapuram of the
Department of Posts where more than 80% staff has
acquired the working knowledge of Hindi:—
1.
Sr. Superintendent of Post Offices, Palakkad
Division-678001
2.
Supreintendent of Post Offices, Tirur Division-
676104
3.
Sr. Superintendent of Post Offices, Aluva Division-
683101
4.
Superintendent of Post Offices, Iddukki Division-
685584
5.
Postal Stores Depot, Thiruvananthapuram-695023
6.
Superintendent of Post Offices, Tiruvalla Division-
689101
7.
Kerala Circle Stamp Depot, Kochi-682020
8.
Superintendent of Post Offices, Manjeri Division-
676121
[No. 11017-1/2011-OL]
MEERA HANDA, Dy. Director General (Philately/OL)
;qok dk;ZØe ,oa [ksy ea=ky;
ubZ fnYyh] 28 twu] 2013
dkñvkñ 1243-
—dsUnzh; ljdkj ,rn~}kjk jktHkk"kk ¼la?k ds
'kkldh; iz;kstuksa ds fy, iz;ksx½ fu;e 1976 ds fu;e 10 ds mi&
fu;e ¼4½ ds vuqlj.k esa ;qok dk;ZØe vkSj [ksy ea=ky; ds
Lok;Rr'kklh dk;kZy; Hkkjrh; [ksy izkfèdj.k] usrkth lqHkk"k {ks=h;
dsanz] y[kuÅ ftlds 80% ls vfèd deZpkjho`a) us ¯gnh dk
dk;Zlkèd Kku izkIr dj fy;k gS] dks vfèlwfpr djrh gSA
[lañ bZ&11011@2@2008&fgñ,ñ]
Fkaxysefy;u] mi lfpo
lapkj ,oa lwpuk izkS|ksfxdh ea=ky;
¼Mkd foHkkx½
ubZ fnYyh] 1tqykbZ] 2013
dkñvkñ 1242-
—µjktHkk"kk fu;e ¼la?k ds 'kkldh; iz;kstuksa
ds fy, iz;ksx½] 1976 ds fu;e 10 ds mi&fu;e ¼4½ ds vuqlj.k
esa dsanz ljdkj] Mkd foHkkx ds vèhuLFk dk;kZy; eq[; iksLVekLVj
tujy] dsjy l£dy] fr#oauriqje ds fuEufyf[kr vèhuLFk
dk;kZy;ksa dks] ftlds 80 izfr'kr ls vfèd vfèdkfj;ksa ,oa
deZpkfj;ksa us ¯gnh dk dk;Zlkèd Kku izkIr dj fy;k gS] vfèlwfpr
djrh gS%
1- ofj"B vèh{kd Mkd?kj dk;kZy;] ikyDdkM
eaMyµ678001
2- vèh{kd Mkd?kj dk;kZy;] fr:j eaMyµ676104
3- ofj"B vèh{kd Mkd?kj dk;kZy;] vkyqok eaMyµ683101
4- vèh{kd Mkd?kj dk;kZy;] bMqDdh eaMyµ685584
5- Mkd HkaMkj fMiks] fr#ouariqjeµ695023
6- vèh{kd Mkd?kj dk;kZy;] fr#oYyk eaMyµ689101
7- dsjy l£dy LVkai fMiks] dksfPpµ682020
8- vèh{kd Mkd?kj dk;kZy;] eatsjh eaMyµ676121
[lañ 11017&1@2011&jkñHkkñ]
ehjk gk.Mk] mi egkfuns'kd ¼fQySVyh@jktHkk"kk½
MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS AND
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
(Department of Posts)
New Delhi, the 1st July, 2013
S.O. 1242.—In pursuance of Rule 10(4) of the
Official Language (use for official purposes of the Union)
3222
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 6, 2013/ASHADHA 15, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
MINISTRY OF YOUTH AFFAIRS AND SPORTS
New Delhi, the 28th June, 2013
S.O. 1243.—In pursunce of sub-rule (4) of Rule of 10 of Official Language (use for official purpose of the
Union) Rule, 1976, the Central Government hereby notifies Sports Authority of India, Netaji Subhas Regional Centre,
Lucknow an autonomous office of Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports, whereof more than 80% staff have acquired
working knowledge of Hindi.
[No. E-11011/2/2008-H.U.]
THANGLEMLIAN, Dy. Secy.
miHkksDrk ekeys] [kk| vkSj lkoZtfud forj.k ea=ky;
¼miHkksDrk ekeys foHkkx½
¼Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks½
ubZ fnYyh] 23 ebZ] 2013
dkñvkñ 1244- µHkkjrh; ekud C;wjks fu;e] 1987 ds fu;e 7 ds mi&fu;e ¼1½ ds [kaM ¼[k½ ds vuqlj.k esa Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks
,rn~}kjk vfèlwfpr djrk gS fd uhps vuqlwph esa fn;s x;s ekud¼dksa½ esa la'kksèu fd;k x;k@fd;s x;s gSa %&
vuqlwph
Øe
la'kksfèr Hkkjrh; ekud¼dksa½ dh la[;k]
la'kksèu dh la[;k vkSj frfFk
LFkkfir frfFk
la[;k
o"kZ vkSj 'kh"kZd
1
vkbZ,l 11673%1992 lksfM;e
la'kksèu dh la[;k 4]
31 ebZ] 2013
gkbZiksDyksjkbV dh fof'kf"V ¼igyk
ebZ 2013
iqujh{k.k½
bl Hkkjrh; ekud dh izfr;ka Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks] ekud Hkou] 9] cgknqj'kkg tQj ekxZ] ubZ fnYyh&110 002 {ks=h; dk;kZy;ksa%
ubZ fnYyh] dksydkrk] p.<+hx<+] pSUubZ] eqEcbZ] rFkk 'kk[kk dk;kZy;ksa% vgenkckn] caxykSj] Hkksiky] Hkqous'oj] dks;Ecrwj] xqokgkVh] gSnjkckn]
t;iqj] dkuiqj] ukxiqj] iVuk] iw.ks rFkk fr#oUurkiqje esa fcØh gsrq miyCè gSaA Hkkjrh; ekudksa dks http:/www.//standardsbis.in }kjk baVjusV
ij [kjhnk tk ldrk gSA
[lanHkZ lh,pMh 1@vkbZ,l 11673]
Mkñ jktho dsñ >k] oSKkfud ^,Q* ,oa izeq[k ¼jlk;u½
MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION
(Department of Consumer Affairs)
(BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS)
New Delhi, the 23rd May, 2013
S.O. 1244.—In pursuance of clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rule, 1987, the
Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards, particulars of which are given in the
Schedule hereto annexed have been issued:—
SCHEDULE
Sl.
No. and year of the
No. and year of
Date from which the
No.
Indian Standards
the amendment
amendment shall have effect
1.
IS 11673:1992 Sodium
Amendment No. 4
31 May, 2013
Hypochlorite Solution-
May 2013
Specification (First revision)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tqykbZ 6] 2013@vk"kk<+ 15] 1935
3223
Copy of this Standard is avilable for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan, 9 Bhadur Shah
Zafar Marg, New Delhi-110 002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi, Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chennai, Mumbai and also
Branch Offices: Ahmedabad,. Bangalore, Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati, Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur,
Nagpur, Patna. Pune, Thiruvananthapuram. On line purchase of Indian Standard can be made at:http:/www.standardsbis.in.
[Ref. CHD 1/IS 11673]
Dr. RAJIV K. JHA, Scientist 'F' & Head (CHD)
ubZ fnYyh] 26 twu] 2013
dkñvkñ 1245-
—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks fu;e 1987 ds fu;e] 7 ds mi&fu;e ¼1½ ds [kaM ¼[k½ ds vuqlj.k esa Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks
,rn~}kjk vfèlwfpr djrh gS fd uhps vuqlwph esa fn; x;s ekud ¼dksa½ esa la'kksèu fd;k x;k@fd;s x;s gSa%µ
vuqlwph
Øe
la'kksfèr Hkkjrh; ekud dh la[;k] vkSj
la'kksèu dh la[;k vkSj frfFk
la[;k
o"kZ
la'kks/ku ykxw gksus dh frfFk
¼1½
¼2½
¼3½
¼4½
1
vkbZ,l 5476%1986 iVlu ls
la'kksèu la[;k 1]
ebZ 2013
lEcfUèr 'kCnksa dh 'kCnkoyh
ebZ 2013
¼igyk iqujh{k.k½
bl la'kksèu dh izfr Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks] ekud Hkou] 9] cgknqj'kkg tQj ekxZ] ubZ fnYyh&110 002 {ks=h; dk;kZy;ksa% ubZ fnYyh]
dksydkrk] p.Mhx<+] pSUubZ] eqEcbZ] rFkk 'kk[kk dk;kZy;ksa% vgenkckn] caxykSj] Hkksiky] Hkqous'oj] dks;Ecrwj] xqokgkVh] gSnjkckn] t;iqj]
dkuiqj] ukxiqj] iVuk] iw.ks rFkk fr#ouUriqje esa fcØh gsrq miyCè gSaA
[lanHkZ Vh,DlMh@th&25]
izHkkdj jk;] oSKkfud ^bZ* ,oa izeq[k ¼Vh,DlMh½
New Delhi, the 26th June, 2013
S.O. 1245.—In pursuance of clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standard Rules. 1987, the
Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards, particulars of which are given in the
Schedule hereto annexed have been issued:—
SCHEDULE
Sl.
No., Title and year of Indian
No. and Year of the
Date from which the
No.
Standards
amendment
amendment shall have
effect
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1
IS 5476:1986 Glossary of Terms
Amendment No. 1
May 2013
relating to Jute
May 2013
Copy of this amendment is avilable for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan, 9 Bhadur Shah Zafar
Marg, New Delhi-110 002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi, Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chennai, Mumbai and also Branch
Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati, Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna.
Pune, Thiruvananthapuram.
[Ref. TXD/G-25]
PRABHAKAR RAI, Scientist 'E' and Head (TXD)
3224
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 6, 2013/ASHADHA 15, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ubZ fnYyh] 26 twu] 2013
dkñvkñ 1246- &Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks fu;e] 1987 ds fu;e] ds mi&fu;e ¼1½ ds [kaM ¼[k½ ds vuqlj.k esa Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks ,rn~}kjk
vfèlwfpr djrk gS fd ftl Hkkjrh; ekud dk fooj.k uhps vuqlwph esa fn;k x;k gS og LFkkfir gks x;k gS%&
vuqlwph
Øe
LFkkfir Hkkjrh; ekud ¼dksa½ dh la[;k]
u;s Hkkjrh; ekud }kjk vfrØfer
LFkkfir frfFk
la[;k
o"kZ vkSj 'kh"kZd
Hkkjrh; ekud vFkok ekudksa] ;fn
dksbZ gks] dh la[;k vkSj o"kZ
¼1½
¼2½
¼3½
¼4½
1
vkbZ,l 15884% 2010 izR;korhZ
&
26&06&2013
fn"V èkjk &lfØ; mtkZ ds fy, la;ksftr
LFkSfrd iquHkZqHkqxrku ehVj ¼Js.kh 1 o 2½ &
fof'kf"V
bl Hkkjrh; ekud dh ,d izfr Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks] ekud Hkou] 9] cgknqj'kkg tQj ekxZ] ubZ fnYyh&110 002] {ks=h; dk;kZy;ksa% ubZ
fnYyh] dksydkrk] p.Mhx<+] psUubZ] eqEcbZ rFkk 'kk[kk dk;kZy;ksa% vgenkckn] caxykSj] Hkksiky] Hkqous'oj] dks;Ecrwj] xqokgkVh] gSnjkckn] t;iqj]
dkuiqj] ukxiqj] iVuk] iw.ks rFkk fr:ouUrkiqje esa fcØh gsrq miyCè gSaA
[lanHkZ bZVh 13@Vh&46]
Mh- xksLokeh] oSKkfud ^,Q* ¼fon~;qr rduhdh foHkkx½
New Delhi, the 26th June, 2013
S.O. 1246.—In pursuance of clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987,
the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards, particulars of which is given in the Schedule
hereto annexed has been issued :
SCHEDULE
Sl.
No. & Year of the
No. & Year of the Indian
Date of
No.
Indian Standard
Standards, if any,
Establishment
Superseded by the New
Indian Standard
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1
IS 15884 : 2010 Alternating
26-06-2013
Current Direct—Connected Static
Prepayment Meters for Active Energy
(Class 1 and 2)—Specification
Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan, 9, Bahadur Shah
Zafar Marg, New Delhi-110 002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi, Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chennai, Mumbai and also
Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati, Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur,
Nagpur, Patna, Pune, Thiruvananthapuram.
[Ref. ET 13/T-46]
D. GOSWAMI, Scientist ‘F’ (Electrotechnical Deptt.)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tqykbZ 6] 2013@vk"kk<+ 15] 1935
3225
ubZ fnYyh] 27 twu] 2013
dk-vk- 1247-&
Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks fu;e] 1987 ds fu;e 7 ds mifu;e ¼1½ ds [kaM ¼[k½ ds vuqlj.k esa Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks ,rn~}kjk
vf/klwfpr djrk gS fd vuqlwph esa fn;s ekud¼dksa½ esa la'kks/ku fd;k x;k@fd;s x;s gaS%
vuqlwph
Øe
la'kksf/kr Hkkjrh; ekud¼dksa½
la'kks/ku dh la[;k
la'kks/ku ykxw gksus
la[;k
dh la[;k o"kZ vkSj 'kh"kZd
vkSj frfFk
dh frfFk
¼1½
¼2½
¼3½
¼4½
1
vkbZ,l 3024% 2006 fn'kkRed d.k
la'kks/ku la[;k 4
fo|qr bLikr dh pnj ,oa iRrh
twu 2013
26 twu] 2013
¼nwljk iqujh{k.k½
bl Hkkjrh; ekud dh izfr;ka Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks] ekud Hkou] 9] cgknqj 'kkg tQj ekxZ] ubZ fnYYkh&110002] {ks=h; dk;kZy;ksa%
ubZ fnYyh] dksydkrk] paMhx<+] psUubZ] eqEcbZ rFkk 'kk[kk dk;kZy;ksa% vgenkckn] caxykSj] Hkksiky] Hkqous'oj] dks;Ecrwj] xqokgkVh] gSnjkckn]
t;iqj] dkuiqj] ukxiqj] iVuk] iq.ks rFkk fr:ouUrkiqje esa fcØh gsrq miyC/k gSaA
[lanHkZ ,eVhMh 4@Vh&69]
ih- ?kks"k] oSKkfud ^,Q* ,oa izeq[k ¼,eVhMh½
New Delhi, the 27th June, 2013
S.O. 1247.—In pursuance of clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987,
the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Amendment(s), Indian Standards, particulars of which are given in
the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each :
SCHEDULE
Sl.
IS No. & Title of the amendment(s)
No. & year of the
Date from which
No.
Amendment(s)
the amendment
shall have effect
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1
IS 3024 : 2006 Grain Oriented Electrical Steel
Amendment No. 4
26 June ,2013
Sheet and Strip (Second Revision)
June, 2013
Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan, 9, Bahadur Shah
Zafar Marg, New Delhi-110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi, Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chennai, Mumbai and also
Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati, Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur,
Nagpur, Patna, Pune, Thiruvananthapuram.
[Ref. MTD 4/T-69]
P. GHOSH, Scientist 'F' & Head (MTD)
ubZ fnYyh] 28 twu] 2013
dk-vk- 1248-&
Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks fu;e 1987 ds fu;e] 7 ds mifu;e ¼1½ ds [kaM ¼[k½ ds vuqlj.k esa Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks ,rn~}kjk
vf/klwfpr djrk gS fd ftu Hkkjrh; ekudksa ds fooj.k uhps vuqlwph esa fn;s gSa os LFkkfir gks x;s gSa %
3226
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 6, 2013/ASHADHA 15, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
vuqlwph
Øe
LFkkfir Hkkjrh; ekud¼dksa½
u;s Hkkjrh; ekud }kjk
LFkkfir frfFk
la[;k
dh la[;k o"kZ vkSj 'kh"kZd
vfrØfer Hkkjrh;
ekud vFkok ekudksa]
;fn dksbZ gks] dh la[;k
vkSj o"kZ
1
vkbZ,l 15298¼Hkkx 3½% 2011@vkbZ,lvks
—
30 twu] 2013
20346 % 2004 futh lqj{kk miLdj Hkkx 3
laj{kh QqVfo;j ¼igyk iqujh{k.k½
bl Hkkjrh; ekud dh izfr;ka Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks] ekud Hkou] 9] cgknqj 'kkg tQj ekxZ] ubZ fnYYkh&110002] {ks=h; dk;kZy;ksa%
ubZ fnYyh] dksydkrk] paMhx<+] psUubZ] eqEcbZ rFkk 'kk[kk dk;kZy;ksa% vgenkckn] caxykSj] Hkksiky] Hkqous'oj] dks;Ecrwj] xqokgkVh] gSnjkckn]
t;iqj] dkuiqj] ukxiqj] iVuk] iq.ks rFkk fr:ouUrkiqje esa fcØh gsrq miyC/k gSaA Hkkjrh; ekudksa dks http://www.standardsbis.in }kjk baVjuSV
ij [kjhnk tk ldrk gSA
[lanHkZ lh,pMh 19@vkbZ,l 15298¼Hkkx 3½@vkbZ,lvks 20346]
ds- ds- iky] oSKkfud ^bZ*
New Delhi, the 28th June, 2013
S.O. 1248—In pursuance of clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987, the
Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards, particulars of which are given in the Schedule
hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each :
SCHEDULE
Sl.
No. & Year of the
No. & Year of Indian
Date of Established
No.
Indian Stardard Established
Standards, if any,
Superseded by the
New Indian Standard
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1
IS/ISO 15298 (Part 3): 2011/ISO 20346: 2004
—
30 June 2013
Personal Protective Equipment Part 3
Protective Footwear (First Revision)
Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan, 9, Bahadur Shah
Zafar Marg, New Delhi-110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi, Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chennai, Mumbai and also
Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati, Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur,
Nagpur, Patna, Pune ,Thiruvananthapuram. On line purchase of Indian Standard can be made at : http://www.standardsbis.in.
[Ref. CHD 19/IS 15298(Part 3)/ISO 20346]
K. K. PAUL, Scientist 'E'
ubZ fnYyh] 28 twu] 2013
dk-vk- 1249-
—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks fu;e 1987 ds fu;e] 7 ds mifu;e ¼1½ ds [kaM ¼[k½ ds vuqlj.k esa Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks ,rn~}kjk
vf/klwfpr djrk gS fd ftu Hkkjrh; ekudksa ds fooj.k uhps vuqlwph esa fn;s x, gSa os LFkkfir gks x;s gSaA
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tqykbZ 6] 2013@vk"kk<+ 15] 1935
3227
vuqlwph
Øe
LFkkfir Hkkjrh; ekud¼dksa½ dh la[;k
u;s Hkkjrh; ekud }kjk
LFkkfir frfFk
la[;k
o"kZ vkSj 'kh"kZd
vfrØfer Hkkjrh;
ekud vFkok ekudksa]
;fn dksbZ gks] dh la[;k
vkSj o"kZ
1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1
vkbZ,l 15298¼Hkkx 2½%2011@vkbZ,lvks
—
30 twu] 2013
20345%2004 futh lqj{kk miLdj Hkkx 2
laj{kh QqVfo;j ¼igyk iqujh{k.k½
bl Hkkjrh; ekud dh izfr;ka Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks] ekud Hkou] 9 cgknqj 'kkg tQj ekxZ] ubZ fnYYkh&110002] {ks=h; dk;kZy;ksa% ubZ
fnYyh] dksydkrk] paMhx<+] psUubZ] eqEcbZ rFkk 'kk[kk dk;kZy;ksa% vgenkckn] caxykSj] Hkksiky] Hkqous'oj] dks;Ecrwj] xqokgkVh] gSnjkckn]
t;iwj] dkuiqj] ukxiqj] iVuk] iq.ks rFkk fr:ouUrkiqje esa fcØh gsrq miyC/k gSaA Hkkjrh; ekudksa dks http://www.standardsbis.in }kjk baVjuSV
ij [kjhnk tk ldrk gSA
[lanHkZ lh,pMh 19@vkbZ,l 15298¼Hkkx 2½@vkbZ,lvks 20345]
ds- ds- iky] oSKkfud ^bZ*
New Delhi, the 28th June, 2013
S.O. 1249.—In pursuance of clause (b) of sub-rule(1) of Rules 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987,
the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards, particulars of which are given in the Scheduled
hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each:
SCHEDULE
Sl.
No. & Year of the
No. & year of Indian
Date of Established
No.
Indian Standard Established
Standards, if any
Superseded by the
New Indian Standard
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1
IS/ISO 15298 (Part 2): 2011/ISO 20345:2004
—
30 June 2013
Personal protective equipment Part 2
Safety Footwear (first revision)
Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar
Marg, New Delhi-110 002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi, Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chennai, Mumbai and also Branch
Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati, Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna,
Pune and Thiruvananthapuram. On line purchase of Indian standard can be made at: http://www.standardsbis.in.
[Ref. CHD 19/IS 15298(Part 2)/ISO 20345]
K. K. PAUL, Scientist 'E'
ubZ fnYyh] 28 twu] 2013
dk-vk- 1250-
—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks fu;e 1987 ds fu;e 7 ds mifu;e ¼1½ ds [kaM ¼[k½ ds vuqlj.k esa Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks ,rn~ }kjk
vf/klwfpr djrk gS fd ftu Hkkjrh; ekudksa ds fooj.k uhps vuqlwph esa fn;s x, gSa os LFkkfir gks x;s gS %
3228
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 6, 2013/ASHADHA 15, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
vuqlwph
Øe
LFkkfir Hkkjrh; ekud¼dksa½
u;s Hkkjrh; ekud }kjk
LFkkfir frfFk
la[;k
dh la[;k o"kZ vkSj 'kh"kZd
vfrØfer Hkkjrh;
ekud vFkok ekudksa]
;fn dksbZ gks] dh la[;k
vkSj o"kZ
1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1
vkbZ,l 299%2012 ,Y;wehuks QSfjd
—
30 twu 2013
fof'k"V ¼ikapoka iqujh{k.k½
bl Hkkjrh; ekud dh izfr;ka Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks] ekud Hkou] 9 cgknqj 'kkg tQj ekxZ] ubZ fnYYkh&110002] {ks=h; dk;kZy;ksa% ubZ
fnYyh] dksydkrk] paMhx<+] psUubZ] eqEcbZ rFkk 'kk[kk dk;kZy;ksa% vgenkckn] caxykSj] Hkksiky] Hkqous'oj] dks;Ecrwj] xqokgkVh] gSnjkckn] t;iqj
dkuiqj] ukxiqj] iVuk] iq.ks rFkk fr:ouUrkiqje esa fcØh gsrq miyC/k gSaA Hkkjrh; ekudksa dks http://www.standardsbis.in }kjk baVjuSV ij [kjhnk
tk ldrk gSA
[lanHkZ lh,pMh 1@vkbZ,l 299]
ds- ds- iky] oSKkfud ^bZ*
New Delhi, the 28th June, 2013
S.O. 1250.—In pursuance of clause (b) of sub-rule(1) of Rules 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987,
the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards, particulars of which are given in the Scheduled
hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each:
SCHEDULE
Sl.
No. & Year of the
No. & year of Indian
Date of Established
No.
Indian Stardard Establishment
Standard, if any
Superseded by the
New Indian Standard
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1
IS 299:2012 Alumino Ferric—Specification
—
30 June 2013
(fifth revision)
Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur Shah
Zafar Marg, New Delhi-110 002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi, Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chennai, Mumbai and also
Branch Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati, Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur,
Patna, Pune and Thiruvananthapuram. On line purchase of Indian standard can be made at: http://www.standardsbis.in.
[Ref. CHD 1/IS 299]
K. K. PAUL, Scientist 'E'
ubZ fnYyh] 1 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1251-&
Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks fu;e 1987 ds fu;e 7 ds mifu;e ¼1½ ds [kaM ¼[k½ ds vuqlj.k esa Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks ,rn~ }kjk
vf/klwfpr djrk gS fd ftu Hkkjrh; ekudksa ds fooj.k uhps vuqlwph eas fn;s x, gSa os LFkkfir gks x;s gSa %
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tqykbZ 6] 2013@vk"kk<+ 15] 1935
3229
vuqlwph
Øe
LFkkfir Hkkjrh; ekud¼dksa½
u;s Hkkjrh; ekud }kjk
LFkkfir frfFk
la[;k
dh la[;k o"kZ vkSj 'kh"kZd
vfrØfer Hkkjrh;
ekud vFkok ekudksa]
;fn dksbZ gks] dh la[;k
vkSj o"kZ
¼1½
¼2½
¼3½
¼4½
1
vkbZ,l 10558%2013 ,Y;wehfu;e 'kksj xSaxos&
—
vizSy 2013
fof'kf"V ¼igyk iqujh{k.k½
2
vkbZ,l 3175%2013 vkarfjd ngu baftu&ikbi
—
ebZ 2013
tksM+ksa ds fy, lhfyax ok'kj fof'kf"V
¼nwljk iqujh{k.k½
3
vkbZ,l 3732%2013 n`< ykbQjSQSV&fof'kf"V
—
ebZ 2013
¼igyk iqujh{k.k½
bl Hkkjrh; ekud dh izfr;ka Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks] ekud Hkou] 9 cgknqj 'kkg tQj ekxZ] ubZ fnYYkh&110002] {ks=h; dk;kZy;ksa ubZ
fnYyh] dksydkrk] paMhx<+] psUubZ] eqEcbZ rFkk 'kk[kk dk;kZy;ksa% vgenkckn] caxykSj] Hkksiky] Hkqous'oj] dks;Ecrwj] xqokgkVh] gSnjkckn]
t;iqj] dkuiqj] ukxiqj] iVuk] iq.ks rFkk fr:ouUrkiqje esa fcØh gsrq miyC/k gSaA
[lanHkZ VhbZMh@th&16]
ih- lh- tks'kh] oSKkfud ^,Q* ,oa izeq[k ¼VhbZMh½
New Delhi, the 1st July, 2013
S.O. 1251.—In pursuance of clause (b) of sub-rule(1) of Rules 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987,
the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards, particulars of which are given in the Scheduled
hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each:
SCHEDULE
Sl.
No., Years and Title of the
No. & year of Indian
Date of Established
No.
Indian Stardard Established
Standard, if any
Superseded by the
New Indian Standard
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1
IS 10558:2013 Aluminium shore
April 2013
gangways—Specification
(First revision)
2
IS 3175:2013 Internal combustion engine—
May 2013
Sealing washers of pine unions—
Specification (Second revision)
3
IS 3732:2013 Rigid liferafts—
May 2013
Specification (First revision)
Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur Shah
Zafar Marg, New Delhi-110 002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi, Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chennai, Mumbai and also
Branch Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati, Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur,
Patna, Pune and Thiruvananthapuram.
[Ref. TED/G-16]
P. C. JOSHI, Scientist 'F' & Head (Transport Engg.)
3230
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 6, 2013/ASHADHA 15, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
dks;yk ea=ky;
ubZ fnYyh] 3 tqykbZ] 2013
dkñvkñ 1252-
—dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ;g izrhr gksrk gS fd blls mikc) vuqlwph esa of.kZr ifj{ks= dh Hkwfe esa ls dks;yk vfHkizkIr gksus dh
laHkkouk gS(
vkSj js[kkad la[;k lh&1 ¼bZ½ III ,Qvkj@889&1112] rkjh[k 2 uoEcj] 2012] dk ftlesa mDr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkw&{ks= vUrfoZ"V gS]
fujh{k.k] osLVuZ dksyQhYM~l fyfeVsM ¼jktLo foHkkx½] dksy bLVsV] flfoy ykbZUl] ukxiqj&440001 ¼egkjk"Vª½ ds dk;kZy; esa ;k eq[;
egkizca/kd ¼,DlIyksjs'ku izHkkx½] dsUnzh; [kku ;kstuk vkSj fMtkbu laLFkku] xksaMokuk iWysl] dkads jksM] jkatphµ834001 ds dk;kZy; esa ;k
dks;yk fu;a=d] 1 dkmafly gkml LVªhV] dksydkrk&700001 ds dk;kZy; esa ;k ftyk dysDVj] ukxiqj ¼egkjk"Vª½ ds dk;kZy; esa fd;k tk
ldsxk(
vr% vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] dks;yk /kkjd {ks= ¼vTkZu vkSj fodkl½ vf/kfu;e] 1957 ¼1957 dk 20½ ¼ftls blesa blds i'pkr~ mDr
vf/kfu;e dgk x;k gS½ dh /kkjk 4 dh mi/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk iznRr 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, iwoksZDr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa dks;ys dk iwosZ{k.k
djus ds vius vk'k; dh lwpuk nsrh gS(
iwoksZDr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa fgrc) dksbZ O;fDr bl vf/klwpuk ds izdk'ku dh rkjh[k ls uCcs fnu dh vof/k ds Hkhrj {ks=h;
egkizca/kd] osLVuZ dksyQhYM~l fyfeVsM] ukxiqj {ks=] iksLV tjhiVdk] rglhy ukxiqj] ftyk ukxiqj&440014 ¼egkjk"Vª½ ;k egkizca/kd] osLVuZ
dksyQhYM~l fyfeVsM] Hkwfe vkSj jktLo foHkkx] dksy bLVsV] flfoy ykbUl] ukxiqj&440 001 ¼egkjk"Vª½ ds dk;kZy; esa]&
¼i½
mDr vf/klwpuk dh /kkjk 4 dh mi&/kkjk ¼3½ ds v/khu dh xbZ fdlh dkjZokbZ ls gqbZ ;k lEHkor% gksus okyh fdlh {kfr ds fy,
vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 ds v/khu izfrdj dk nkok dj ldsxh( ;k
¼ii½ mDr vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 13 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ ds v/khu iwosZ{k.k vuqKfIr;ksa ds izHkkoghu gksus ds laca/k esa ;k mDr vf/kfu;e dh
/kkjk 13 dh mi&/kkjk ¼4½ ds v/khu [kuu iV~Vs ds izHkkoghu gksus ds fy, izfrdj dk nkok dj ldsxk vkSj mls mDr vf/kfu;e dh
/kkjk 13 dh mi/kkjk ¼1½ ds [kaM ¼i½ ls ¼iv½esa fofufnZ"V enksa dh ckcr mixr O;; dks minf'kZr djus ds fy, iwoksZDr Hkwfe ls
lacaf/kr lHkh ekufp=ksa] pkVksZ± vkSj vU; nLrkostksa dks ifjnRr dj ldsxkA
vuqlwph
laxe CykWd
ukxiqj {ks=
ftyk&ukxiqj ¼egkjk"Vª½
[js[kkad la[;k&lh&1 ¼bZ½III/,Qvkj@889&1112] rkjh[k 2 uoEcj] 2012]
Øzñ lañ
xzke dk uke iVokjh lfdZy la[;k
rglhy
ftyk {ks=Qy
fVIi.kh
¼gsDVj esa½
1-
xks.M[Skjh
24
dyes'oj
ukxiqj
22-25
Hkkx
2-
isU<+kjh
6
fgaxuk
ukxiqj
312-80
Hkkx
3-
cM+/kkeuk
6
fgaxuk
ukxiqj
82-58
Hkkx
4-
loj/kksVk
6
fgaxuk
ukxiqj
129-14
Hkkx
5-
flUdk
59
fgaxuk
ukxiqj
28-65
Hkkx
6-
laxe
50
fgaxuk
ukxiqj
191-34
Hkkx
7-
[kSjh ¼iUukl½
50
fgaxuk
ukxiqj
482-47
Hkkx
8-
/kkuksyh ¼fdUgh½
50
fgaxuk
ukxiqj
126-37
Hkkx
dqy {ks=% 1375-60 gsDVj ¼yxHkx½
;k 3399-11 ,dM+ ¼yxHkx½
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tqykbZ 6] 2013@vk"kk<+ 15] 1935
3231
lhek o.kZu%
d&[k
js[kk xzke xks.M[kSjh esa fcUnq ^d* ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke xks.M[kSjh ls gksdj xqtjrh gqbZ] xzke xks.M[kSjh ,oa xzke is.<kjh dh
lfEefyr lhek dks ikj djrh gS] fQj xzke is.<+kjh ls xqtjrh gqbZ xzke is.<+kjh ,oa xzke oM+/kkeuk dh lfEefyr lhek dks ikj
djrh gqbZ] xzke cM+/kkeuk esa ls xqtjrh gqbZ fcUnq ^[k* ij feyrh gSA
[k&x
js[kk xzke oM+/kkeuk esa ls xqtjrh gqbZ xzke oM+/kkeuk rFkk laxe dh lfEefyr lhek dks ikj djrh gqbZ xzke laxe esa fcUnq ^x* ij
feyrh gSA
x&?k
js[kk xzke laxe ls xqtjrh gqbZ] xzke laxe ,oa xzke /kkuksyh ¼fdUgh½ dh lfEefyr lhek dks ikj djrh gqbZ xzke /kkuksyh
¼fdUgh½ ds fcUnq ^?k* ij feyrh gSA
?k&d
js[kk xzke /kkuksyh ¼fdUgh½ esa ls xqtjrh gqbZ xzke /kkuksyh ¼fdUgh½ rFkk xzke [kSjh ¼iUukls½ dh lfEefyr lhek dks ikj djrh
gqbZ xzke [kSjh iUukls esa ls xqtjrh gS fQj xzke [kSjh ¼iUukls½ ,oa flUdk dh lfEefyr lhek dks ikj djrh gS] fQj xzke flUdk
esa ls xqtjrh gqbZ xzke flUdk ,oa xzke isU<+kjh dh lfEefyr lhek dks ikj djrh gS rFkk xzke isU<+kjh esa ls xqtjrh gS vkSj xzke isU<+kjh
rFkk xzke xks.M[kSjh dh lfEefyr lhek dks ikj djrh gqbZ xzke xks.M[kSjh esa vkjafHkd fcUnq ^d* ij feyrh gSA
[la- 43015@36@2012&ihvkjvkbZMCY;w&I]
oh- ,l- jk.kk] voj lfpo
MINISTRY OF COAL
New Delhi, the 3rd July, 2013
S.O. 1252.— whereas it appears to the Central Government that Coal is likely to be obtained from the land in the
locality described in the Schedule annexed hereto;
And Whereas the plan bearing number C-1(E)III/FR889-1112] dated the 2nd November, 2012 containing of the
areas of land described in the said Schedule may be inspected at the office of the Western Coalifields limited (Revenue
Department), Coal Estate, Civil Lines, Nagpur-440 001 (Maharashtra) or at the office of the Chief General Manager
(Exploration Division), Central Mine Planning and Design Institute, Gondwana Palace, Kanke Road, Ranchi-834 001 or
at the office of the Coal Controller, 1, Council House Street, Kolkata-700001 or at the office of the District Collector,
Nagpur (Maharashtra);
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas
(Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 (20 of 1957), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), the Central Govern-
ment hereby gives notice of its intention to prospect for coal in the land described in the abforesaid Schedule;
Any person interested in the land described in the aforesaid Schedule may—
(i)
claim compensation under section 6 of the said Act for any damage caused or likely to be caused by any
action taken under sub-section (3) of Section 4 of the said Act; or
(ii)
claim compensation under sub-section (1) of section 13 of the Act in respect of prospecting license ceasing
to have effect or under sub-section (4) of section 13 of the Act for mining lease ceasing to have effect and
deliver all maps, charts and other documents relating to the aforesaid land to show the expenditure incurred
in respect of items specified in clauses (i) to (iv) of sub-section (1) of Section 13 of the said Act.
to the office of the Area General Manager, Western Coalifields Limited, Nagpur Area, Post Jaripatka, Tahsil Nagpur,
District Nagpur- 440014 (Maharashtra) or General Manager, Western Coalifields Limited, Land and Revenue Depart-
ment, Coal Estate, Civil Lines, Nagpur-440 0014 (Maharashtra) within a period of ninety days from the date of publica-
tion of this notification.
3232
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 6, 2013/ASHADHA 15, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
SCHEDULE
Sangam Block
Nagpur Area
District Nagpur (Maharashtra)
(plan bearing number C-1(E)III/FR/889-112, dated 2nd November, 2012)
Sl. Name of village
Patwari Circle
Tahsil
District
Area (in
Remarks
No.
Number
hectares)
1
Gondkhairi
24
Kalmeshwar
Nagpur
22.25
Part
2
Pendhari
6
Hingna
Nagpur
312.80
Part
3
Waddhamana
6
Hingna
Nagpur
82.58
Part
4
Sawardhota
6
Hingna
Nagpur
129.14
Full
5
Sinka
59
Hingna
Nagpur
28.65
Part
6
Sangam
50
Hingna
Nagpur
191.34
Part
7
Khairi (Pannase)
50
Hingna
Nagpur
482.47
Part
8
Dhanoli (Kinhi)
50
Hingna
Nagpur
126.37
Part
Total area: 1375.60 hectares (approximately)
or 3399.11 acres (approximately)
Boundary description:
A-B:
Lines starts from Point 'A' from village Gondkhairi and passes through village Gondkhairi, then crosses
the common boundary of villages Gondkhairi and Pendhari and passes through village Pendhari, then
crosses the common boundary of villages Pendhari and Waddhamana and meets at Point 'B' in village
Waddhamana.
B-C:
Line passes through village Waddhamana, then crosses the common boundary of villages Waddhamana
and Sangam and meets at Point 'C' in village Sangam.
C-D:
Line passes through village Sangam and crosses the common boundary of villages Sangam and Dhanoli
(Kinhi) and meets at Point ‘D’ in village Dhanoli (Kinhi).
D-A:
Line passes through village Dhanoli (Kinhi), then crosses the common boundary of villages Dhanoli
(Kinhi) and Khairi (Pannase) and crosses the common boundary of villages Khairi (Pannase) and Sinka,
then crosses the common boudary of villages Khairi (Pannase) and Pendhari and crosses the common
boundary of villages Pendhari and Gondkhairi and meets at starting Point 'A'.
[No. 43015/36/2012-PRIW-I]
V. S. RANA, Under Secy.
ubZ fnYyh] 3 tqykbZ] 2013
dkñvkñ 1253-& dsUnzh; ljdkj us dks;yk /kkjd {ks= ¼vtZu vkSj fodkl½ vf/kfu;e] 1957 ¼1957 dk 20½ ¼ftls blesa blds i'pkr~
mDr vf/kfu;e dgk x;k gS½ dh /kkjk 4 dh mi/kkjk ¼1½ ds v/khu Hkkjr ljdkj esa dks;yk ea=ky; ds }kjk tkjh dh xbZ vf/klwpuk la[;kad
dkñvkñ 2349] rkjh[k 29 vxLr] 2011 tks Hkkjr ds jkti= ds Hkkx II, [kaM 3] mi[kaM (ii)] rkjh[k 3 flrEcj] 2011 esa izdkf'kr dh xbZ Fkh] ml
vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa fofufnZ"V ifj{ks= dh Hkwfe esa ftldk eki 103-000 gsDVj ¼yxHkx½ ;k 254-51 ,dM+ ¼yxHkx½ gS] dks;ys dk
iwosZ{k.k djus ds vius vk'k; dh lwpuk nh Fkh(
vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ;g lek/kku gks x;k gS fd mDr Hkwfe esa dks;yk vfHkizkIr gSA
vr% dsUnzh; ljdkj] mDr vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 7 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk iznRr 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, blls layXu vuqlwph esa of.kZr
102-181 gsDVj ¼yxHkx½ ;k 252-49 ,dM+ ¼yxHkx½ eki dh mDr Hkwfe esa ;k ml ij ds Hkw&lrg dk vtZu djus ds vius vk'k; dh lwpuk
nsrh gSA
fVIi.k 1%
bl vf/klwpuk ds v/khu vkus okys {ks= ds js[kkad la[;k ,lbZlh,y@ch,lih@th,e ¼ih,yth½@Hkwfe@437] rkjh[k 28 tuojh]
2013 dk fujh{k.k dyDVj] ftyk mekfj;k ¼e/; izns'k½ ds dk;kZy; esa ;k dks;yk fu;a=d] 1] dkmafly gkml LVªhV]
dksydkrk&700001 ds dk;kZy; esa ;k lkmFk bZLVuZ dksyQhYM~l fyfeVsM ¼jktLo vuqHkkx½] lhir jksM] fcykliqj&495006
¼NRrhlx<+½ ds dk;kZy; esa fd;k tk ldrk gSA
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tqykbZ 6] 2013@vk"kk<+ 15] 1935
3233
fVIi.k 2% mDr vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 8 ds mica/kksa dh vksj /;ku vkd`"V fd;k tkrk gS] ftlesa fuEufyf[kr mica/k gS%&
vtZu ds ckcr~ vkifRr;kW%
^^8- ¼1½ dksbZ O;fDr tks fdlh Hkwfe esa ftldh ckcr~ /kkjk 7 ds v/khu vf/klwpuk fudkyh xbZ gS] fgrc) gS] vf/klwpuk ds fudkys tkus
ls rhl fnu ds Hkhrj lEiw.kZ Hkwfe ;k mlds fdlh Hkkx ;k ,slh Hkwfe esa ;k ml ij ds fdUgha vf/kdkjksa dk vtZu fd, tkus ds ckjs esa vkifRr dj
ldsxkA
Li"Vhdj.k%&bl /kkjk ds vUrxZr ;g vkifRr ugha ekuh tk,xh fd dksbZ O;fDr fdlh Hkwfe esa dks;yk mRiknu ds fy, Lo;a [kuu lafØ;k,a
djuk pkgrk gS vkSj ,slh lafØ;k,a dsUnzh; ljdkj ;k fdlh vU; O;fDr dks ugha djuh pkfg,A
¼2½ mi/kkjk ¼1½ ds v/khu izR;sd vkifRr l{ke vf/kdkjh dks fyf[kr :i esa dh tk,xh vkSj l{ke vf/kdkjh] vkifRrdrkZ dks Lo;a lqus
tkus] fof/k O;olk;h }kjk lquokbZ dk volj nsxk vkSj ,slh lHkh vkifRr;ksa dks lquus ds i'pkr~ vkSj ,slh vfrfjDr tkap] ;fn dksbZ gks] djus ds
i'pkr~] tks og vko';d le>rk gS] og ;k rks /kkjk 7 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ ds v/khu vf/klwfpr Hkwfe dk ;k ,slh Hkwfe esa ;k ml ij ds vf/kdkjksa
ds laca/k esa ,d fjiksVZ ;k ,slh Hkwfe ds fofHkUu VqdM+s ;k ,slh Hkwfe esa ;k ml ij ds vf/kdkjksa ds laca/k esa vkifRr;ksa ij viuh flQkfj'ksa vkSj mlds
}kjk dh xbZ dk;Zokgh ds vfHkys[k lfgr fofHkUu fjiksV± dsUnzh; ljdkj dks mlds fofu'p; ds fy, nsxkA
¼3½ bl /kkjk ds iz;kstuksa ds fy, og O;fDr fdlh Hkwfe esa fgrc) le>k tk,xk tks izfrdj esa fgr dk nkok djus dk gdnkj gksxk] ;fn
Hkwfe ;k fdlh ,slh Hkwfe esa ;k ml ij ds vf/kdkj bl vf/kfu;e ds v/khu vftZr dj fy, tkrs gSaA**
fVIi.k 3% dsUnzh; ljdkj }kjk Hkkjr ds jkti=] Hkkx II, [k.M 3] mi&[k.M (ii) rkjh[k 4 vizSy] 1987 esa izdkf'kr vf/klwpuk la[;kad
dkñ vkñ 905] rkjh[k 20 ekpZ] 1987 }kjk dks;yk fu;a=d] 1] dkmafly gkml LVªhV] dksydkrk&700001 dks mDr vf/kfu;e dh
/kkjk 3 ds v/khu l{ke izkf/kdkjh fu;qDr fd;k tkrk gSA
vuqlwph
fiukSjk fMfiyfjax Cykd] Qst&2] tksfgyk {ks=
ftyk & mefj;k ¼e/; izns'k½
[js[kkad la[;k ,lbZlh,y@ch,lih@th,e¼ih,yth½@Hkwfe@437] rkjh[k 28 tuojh] 2013]
Hkw&lrg vf/kdkj%
Øñ
xzke dk
iVokjh
tujy
rglhy
ftyk
{ks=
fVIi.kh
lañ
uke
gYdk
la[;kad
gsDVj esa
la[;kad
1-
nsojh vegkbZ
67
334
ukSjkstkckn
mefj;k
65-730
Hkkx
2-
fiukSjk
67
413
ukSjkstkckn
mefj;k
36-451
Hkkx
dqy%&102-181 gsDVj ¼yxHkx½
;k 252-49 ,dM+ ¼yxHkx½
1- xzke nsojh vegkbZ ¼Hkkx½ esa vftZr fd, tkus okys IykV la[;k%
87 ¼Hkkx½] 88 ¼Hkkx½] 104 ¼Hkkx½] 105 ¼Hkkx½]
106 ¼Hkkx½] 107 ¼Hkkx½] 108 ¼Hkkx½] 109 ¼Hkkx½] 110 ¼Hkkx½] 111 ¼Hkkx½] 112 ¼Hkkx½] 130] 131 ¼Hkkx½] 132 ¼Hkkx½]
133 ls 139] 140 ¼Hkkx½] 143 ¼Hkkx½] 145 ¼Hkkx½] 147 ¼Hkkx½] 148 ls 183] 184 ¼Hkkx½] 185 ¼Hkkx½] 190 ¼Hkkx½] 191
¼Hkkx½] 192 ¼Hkkx½] 193] 194 ¼Hkkx½] 195 ¼Hkkx½] 196 ¼Hkkx½A
2-
xzke fiukSjk ¼Hkkx½ esa vftZr fd, tkus okys IykV la[;k%
493 ¼Hkkx½] 495 ¼Hkkx½] 496 ¼Hkkx½] 547 ¼Hkkx½] 549 ¼Hkkx½] 550 ¼Hkkx½] 551] 552] 553 ¼Hkkx½] 557 ¼Hkkx½] 558
ls 563] 565 ¼Hkkx½] 578 ls 587] 598 ¼Hkkx½] 599] 600] 605] 633 ¼Hkkx½A
3234
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 6, 2013/ASHADHA 15, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
lhek o.kZu%
d&[k
js[kk] xzke nsojh vegkbZ esa fcUnq ^^d** ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj IykV la[;kad 145] 147] 143] 140] 131] 88] 105] 106]
107@2] 107@1] 108] 109] 110] 111 ls gksdj tkrh gS fQj xzke fiukSjk esa izos'k djrh gS vkSj IykV la[;kad 547] 549] 550]
553] 557] 496] 495] 493] 565 ls xqtjrh gS vkSj fcUnq ^^[k** ij feyrh gSA
[k&x
js[kk] xzke fiukSjk ds IykV la[;kad 565 ls gksdj IykV la[;kad 563] 578] 586 ds iwohZ] IykV la[;kad 587] 598 ds iwohZ
vkSj nf{k.kh] 599 ds mÙkjh vkSj iwohZ] 600] 605 ds iwohZ lhek ls gksrh gqbZ tkrh gS vkSj fcUnq ^^x** ij feyrh gSA
x&?k
js[kk] xzke fiukSjk ds IykV la[;kad 605 ds nf{k.kh lhek vkSj 633 ls gksdj tkrh gS fQj xzke nsojh vegkbZ esa izos'k djrh
gS fQj IykV la[;kad 185] 184] 190] 191] 192] 194] 195] 196@1 ls gksrh gqbZ tkrh gS vkSj fcUnq ^^?k** ij feyrh gSA
?k&d
js[kk] xzke nsojh vegkbZ ds IykV la[;kad 196@1] 196@2] 145 ls gksdj xqtjrh gS vkSj vkjafHkd fcUnq ^^d** ij feyrh gSA
[lañ 43015&05@2011&ihvkjvkbZMCY;wµI]
ohñ ,lñ jk.kk] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 3rd July, 2013
S.O. 1253.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Coal number S.O. 2349,
dated the 29th August, 2011 issued under sub-section (1) of Section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and
Development) Act, 1957 (20 or 1957) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), and published in the Gazette of India,
Part-II, Section 3, sub-section (ii), dated the 3rd September, 2011, the Central Government gave notice of its intention
to prospect for coal in 103.000 hectares (approximately) or 254.51 acres (approximately) of the land in the locality
specified in the Schedule annexed to that notification.
And whereas the Central Government is satisfied that coal is obtainable in a part of the said land specified in the
Schedule appended to this notification.
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 7 of the said Act, the Central
Government hereby gives notice of its intention to acquire the land measuring 102.181 hectares (approximately) or
252.49 acres (approximately) as Surface Rights in and over the said land described in the Schedule apended hereto.
Note 1:
The plan bearing number SECL/BSP/GM(PLG)/LAND/437, dated the 28th January, 2013 of the area
covered by this notification may be inspected in the office of the Collector, District Umaria (Madhya
Pradesh) or in the office of the Coal Controller, 1, Council House Street, Kolkata-700001 or in the
office of the South Eastern Coalfields Limited (Revenue Section), Seepat Road, Bilaspur-495006
(Chhattisgarh).
Note 2:
Attention is hereby invited to the provisions of Section 8 of the said Act which provides as follows:—
Objection to acquisition:
"8. (1) Any person interested in any land in respect of which a notification under Section 7 has been issued may,
within thirty days of the issue of the notification, object to the acquisition of the whole or any part of the land or any
rights in or over such land.
Explanation.—It shall not be an objection within the meaning of this section for any person to say that he himself
desires to undertake mining operations in the land for the production of coal and that such operations should not be
undertaken by the Central Government or by any other person.
(2) Every objection under sub-section (1) shall be made to the competent authority in writing, and the competent
authority shall give the objector an opportunity of being heard either in person or by a legal practitioner and shall, after
hearing all such objections and after making such further inquiry, if any, as he thinks necessary, either make a report in
respect of the land which has been notified under sub-section (1) of Section 7 or of rights in or over such land, or make
different Reports in respect of different parcels of such land or of rights in or over such land, to the Central Government,
containing his recommendations on the objections, together with the record of the proceedings held by him, for the
decision of the Government.
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tqykbZ 6] 2013@vk"kk<+ 15] 1935
3235
(3) For the purposes of this section, a person shall be deemed to be interested in land who would be entitled to
claim an interest in compensation if the land or any rights in or over such land were acquired under this Act."
Note 3:
The Coal Controller, 1, Council House Street, Kolkata-700001, has been appointed by the Central
Government as the competent authority under section 3 of the said Act, vide Notificiation Number
S.O. 905, dated the 20th March, 1987, published in Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii) of the Gazette of
India, dated the 4th April, 1987.
SCHEDULE
Pinoura Depillaring Block, Phase-IInd, Johilla Area
District - Umaria (Madhya Pradesh)
[Plan bearing number SECL/BSP/GM(PLG)/LAND 437, dated the 28th January, 2013]
Surface Rights:
Sr.
Name of
Patwari
General
Tahsil
District
Area in
Remarks
No.
village
halk
number
hectares
1.
Deori Amhai 67
334
Nowrozabad
Umaria
65.730
Part
2.
Pinoura
67
413
Nowrozabad
Umaria
36.451
Part
Total:-102.181 hectares (approximately)
or 252.49 acres (approximately)
1.
Plot number to be acquired in village Deori Amhai (Part):
87 (P), 88 (P), 104 (P), 105 (P), 106 (P), 107 (P), 108 (P), 109 (P), 110 (P), 111 (P), 112 to 130, 131 (P),
132 (P), 133 to 139, 140 (P), 143 (P), 145 (P), 147 (P), 148 to 183, 184 (P), 185 (P), 190 (P), 191 (P),
192(P), 193, 194 (P), 195 (P), 196 (P)
2.
Plot numbers to be acquired in village Pinoura (Part):
493 (P), 495 (P), 496 (P), 547 (P), 549 (P), 550 (P), 551, 552, 553 (P), 557(P), 558 to 563, 565 (P), 578
to 587, 598 (P) 599, 600, 605, 633 (P).
Boundary description:
A-B
Line starts from point 'A' in village Deori Amhai and passes through plot number 145, 147, 143, 140,
131, 88, 105, 106, 107/2, 107/1, 108, 109, 110, 111 then enter in village pinoura and passes through 547,
549, 550, 553, 557, 496, 495, 493, 565 and meets at point 'B'.
B-C
Line passes in village Pinoura throught plot number 565, along eastern boundary of plot number 563,
578, 586, eastern and southern boundary of plot number 587, 598, northern and eastern boundary of plot
number 599, eastern boundary of plot number 600, 605 and meets at point 'C'.
C-D
Line passes in village Pinoura along southern boundary of plot number 605, through 633 then enter in
village Deori Amhai and passes through 185, 184, 190, 191, 192, 194, 195, 196/1 and meets at point 'D'.
D-A
Line passes in village Deori Amhai through plot number 196/1, 196/2, 145 and meets at starting point 'A'.
[No. 43015-05/2011-PRIW-I]
V. S. RANA, Under Secy.
isVªksfy;e vkSj izkdfrd xSl ea=ky;
ubZ fnYyh] 2 tqykbZ] 2013
dk- vk- 1254-
—dsUnzh; ljdkj dks yksdfgr eas ;g vko';d izrhr gksrk gS fd NRrhlx<+ jkT; esa ikjknhi ¼mM+hlk½ ls jk;iqj
¼NRrhlx<+½ ,oa jk¡ph ¼>kj[k.M½ rd isVªksfy;e mRiknkas ds ifjogu ds fy;s bafM;u vkW;y dkiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkuh
pkfg, A
3236
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 6, 2013/ASHADHA 15, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slh ikbiykbu fcNkus ds
iz;kstu ds fy;s ;g vko”;d izrhr gksrk gS fd ,slh Hkwfe esa
tks bl ls mikc) vuqlwph es of.kZr gS] vkSj ftlesa mDr
ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkus dk izLrko gS] mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk
vtZu fd;k tk, A
vr% vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut
ikbiykbu ¼Hkwfe es mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½
vf/kfu;e]1962 ¼1962 dk 50½ dh /kkjk 3 dh mi/kkjk ¼1½
}kjk iznÙk “kfDr;ks dk iz;ksx djrs gq, ml Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds
vf/kdkj dk vtZu djus ds vius vk”k; dh ?kks’k.kk djrh gS A
dksbZ O;fä, tks mDr vuqlwph eas of.kZr Hkwfe esa fgrc)
gS]ml rkjh[k ls, ftldks bl vf/klwpuk esa ;qDr Hkkjr ds
jkti= dh izfr;ka¡ lk/kkj.k turk dks miyC/k djk nh tkrh
gS] bDdhl fnu ds Hkhrj] Hkwfe ds uhps ikbiykbu fcNk,
tkus ds fy, mlesa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj ds vtZu ds lac/ka esa
Jh fnyhi dqekj vxzoky] l{ke izkf/kdkjh] ikjknhi&
lEcyiqj&jk;iqj&jk¡ph ikbiykbu ifj;kstuk, ,&13] lsDVj
1] voafr fogkj] jk;iqj &492006 ¼NRrhlx<+½ dks fyf[kr
#i eas vk{ksi Hkst ldsxk A
vuqlwph
rglhy % tStSiqj ftyk % tkatxhj&pkaik jkT; % NÙkhlx<
dz-
Xkkao dk uke
[kljk
{ks=Qy
la-
la-
gsDV;j
,;j oxZ ehVj
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
ijlnk
177/8
00
09
72
177/9
00
00
92
177/7,177/13
00
03
96
177/12
00
01
76
177/10
00
08
94
286/6
00
01
35
286/3
00
03
00
224
00
03
60
251
00
04
62
164/1
00
04
88
2
glkSn
1652
00
01
00
1696
00
14
94
2264
00
00
43
1676
00
00
35
1677
00
01
91
1693
00
04
59
1690
00
01
98
3
nsoj?kVk
851
00
00
36
869
00
02
40
792
00
01
87
856
00
01
01
728/1
00
01
89
844,845
00
06
70
4
cSgkxqM:
15
00
02
03
36
00
11
73
795
00
06
94
876
00
01
20
48/1
00
00
45
20
00
00
36
19
00
00
76
738
00
03
26
44
00
02
77
737
00
02
01
33
00
04
17
42
00
07
54
5. rqehMhg
45/26
00
20
16
46
00
11
44
88
00
00
66
268
00
03
25
293
00
02
08
45/1t
00
02
45
45/1B
00
01
71
266
00
11
15
68
00
00
47
77
00
00
94
53
00
00
55
52
00
02
28
56/6 d
00
03
78
6
dqVjkcksM
1556
00
02
95
1551/2
00
07
00
1
2
3
4
5
6
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tqykbZ 6] 2013@vk"kk<+ 15] 1935
3237
6 dqVjkcksM (tkjh)
1604/4
00
08
46
1290/3
00
00
20
1562/2
00
00
20
1562/4
00
00
53
1388/3
00
00
10
1388/2,1388/4
00
02
53
1272/7
00
03
42
1618
00
01
25
1385/1,1386/1
00
01
18
1561
00
00
69
1390
00
00
37
1382,1383
00
01
63
1378/1
00
01
97
1378/4
00
02
29
1299
00
02
92
1303
00
02
44
1302
00
01
66
1304
00
02
50
1358/1
00
00
15
1523
00
00
83
7
vksMs+dsjk
1097/4
00
09
90
1148/3
00
04
36
1411/3
00
00
44
1412/2
00
03
06
1414/4
00
07
56
1414/7
00
04
68
1467/3
00
04
50
1502/1
00
01
37
1502/2
00
05
16
1502/3
00
05
22
1510/2
00
01
11
244/3
00
01
80
244/6
00
01
40
244/7
00
02
60
2849/3
00
05
04
2899
00
01
97
7
vksMs+dsjk
2849/1
00
02
35
2852
00
05
28
2891/2
00
03
33
2897
00
05
58
415/3
00
01
12
495/6
00
02
10
2840 /dk VqdM+k 00
05
40
2895
00
01
32
1408/4
00
03
45
1408/1
00
01
01
1449
00
00
44
1510/2
00
01
11
1510/4
00
03
21
1513
00
01
22
1543
00
01
29
1098
00
02
46
1095
00
00
56
488
00
00
75
494/2
00
01
47
261
00
00
51
1276/2
00
05
07
195
00
00
52
31/1
00
01
44
53
00
00
58
1462/1
00
02
36
1284/2
00
00
53
1501
00
01
83
1415
00
00
62
1400
00
01
65
1397
00
00
12
44
00
01
27
197/2
00
00
56
412
00
01
15
410
00
03
09
1286/2
00
00
53
2851/2
00
02
54
2841
00
01
15
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
3238
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 6, 2013/ASHADHA 15, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
7 vksMs+dsjk (tkjh)
2901/2
00
07
75
1450
00
02
05
1394
00
01
12
8
xyxykMhg
715/1g
00
04
46
715/1Hk
00
00
38
715/1³
00
10
26
715/1Fk
00
02
73
715/1 .k
00
01
85
698
00
00
35
700
00
03
47
9
BBkjh
238
00
01
86
72
00
01
68
571
00
00
92
247
00
01
50
263/2
00
01
50
2545/2
00
08
28
597/1 dk VqdM+k 00
00
72
248
00
02
39
245
00
07
56
2024
00
29
14
2025
00
09
26
2023/ dk VqdM+k 00
32
02
246/1
00
03
00
62,63
00
01
72
67
00
00
40
2482
00
02
54
2520
00
02
00
2546
00
03
68
2539
00
01
50
567
00
00
58
237
00
04
01
103
00
01
18
101
00
02
51
59,60
00
03
15
98
00
00
28
9
BBkjh (tkjh)
570
00
03
14
102
00
03
63
10
xqpdqfy;k
16
00
00
30
¼egky uEcj&1½
11
xqpdqfy;k
98
00
12
97
¼egky uEcj&2½
70
00
00
70
12
xqpdqfy;k
81
00
05
11
¼egky uEcj&3½
80
00
00
26
84
00
00
20
88
00
00
84
98
00
29
16
83
00
00
74
13
uUnsyh
727/1
00
02
52
¼egky uEcj&1½ 658/2
00
08
04
667
00
09
75
730
00
01
29
662
00
04
51
811
00
00
54
813
00
02
13
725
00
02
59
653
00
01
90
666
00
05
41
818
00
03
91
663
00
05
89
721
00
03
86
719
00
01
91
716
00
00
67
14
uUnsyh
690
00
01
96
¼egky uEcj&2½
692
00
00
31
700
00
09
82
17
00
10
40
15
dksVsrjk
322
00
00
42
261
00
01
85
748
00
06
23
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tqykbZ 6] 2013@vk"kk<+ 15] 1935
3239
15
dksVsrjk (tkjh)
310
00
03
96
810
00
00
57
329
00
15
30
38
00
19
06
317
00
05
40
911,912/2
00
02
66
848
00
01
19
274
00
12
52
272
00
00
80
809
00
00
30
34
00
00
54
306
00
00
95
28
00
01
01
326
00
01
13
841
00
01
47
30
00
02
06
308
00
01
81
847
00
05
88
241
00
01
19
917
00
00
38
325
00
02
20
37
00
00
29
330
00
06
86
16
rqlkj
145
00
01
15
438
00
00
33
66
00
02
61
439
00
01
19
455
00
02
83
77
00
02
40
137
00
01
27
373
00
00
92
404
00
00
45
642
00
05
40
16
00
05
84
136
00
01
57
144
00
01
92
16
rqlkj (tkjh)
460
00
01
06
423
00
00
20
67
00
00
88
140
00
09
88
134
00
00
74
456
00
03
74
458
00
00
69
416
00
00
87
111
00
02
52
115
00
00
42
17
BwBh
581
00
07
46
571
00
04
67
678
00
06
84
83
00
09
36
578
00
03
15
650
00
18
00
569
00
05
15
559
00
07
17
544
00
00
89
580
00
02
93
665
00
17
03
545
00
02
27
673
00
06
96
557
00
00
61
552
00
04
06
[la- vkj&25011@28@2011&vksvkj&I]
iou dqekj] voj lfpo
MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS
New Delhi, the 2nd July, 2013
S.O. 1254.—Whereas, it appears to the Central
Government that it is necessary in the public interest that
for the transportation of petroleum products from Paradip
(Orissa) to Raipur (Chhattisgarh)& Ranchi (Jharkhand), a
Pipeline” should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation
Limited;
And w]hereas, it appears to the Central Government
that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary
to acquire the right of user in the land under which the
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
3240
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 6, 2013/ASHADHA 15, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described
in the schedule annexed hereto ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred
by sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and
Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land)
Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby
declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the
said schedule may, within twenty–one days from the date
on which the copies of the Gazette of India containing
this notification are made available to the General Public,
object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user
therein or laying of the pipeline under the land to
Shri Dilip Kumar Agrawal,Competent Authority, Indian
Oil Corporation Limited,Paradip – Sambalpur – Raipur –
Ranchi Pipeline Project, A-13, Sector -1, Avanti Vihar,
Raipur – 492006, Chhattisgarh.
SCHEDULE
Tehsil : Jajaipur District: Janjgir
State : Chhattisgarh
Champa
Sl.
Name of the
Khasara
Area
No. Village
No.
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
Parsada
177/8
00
09
72
177/9
00
00
92
177/7,177/13
00
03
96
177/12
00
01
76
177/10
00
08
94
286/6
00
01
35
286/3
00
03
00
224
00
03
60
251
00
04
62
164/1
00
04
88
2
Hasaud
1652
00
01
00
1696
00
14
94
2264
00
00
43
1676
00
00
35
1677
00
01
91
1693
00
04
59
1690
00
01
98
3 Devarghata
851
00
00
36
869
00
02
40
3 Devarghata
792
00
01
87
(Contd.)
856
00
01
01
728/1
00
01
89
844,845
00
06
70
4
Baihagudru
15
00
02
03
36
00
11
73
795
00
06
94
876
00
01
20
48/1
00
00
45
20
00
00
36
19
00
00
76
738
00
03
26
44
00
02
77
737
00
02
01
33
00
04
17
42
00
07
54
5
Tumidih
45/26
00
20
16
46
00
11
44
88
00
00
66
268
00
03
25
293
00
02
08
45/1 G
00
02
45
45/1Tha
00
01
71
266
00
11
15
68
00
00
47
77
00
00
94
53
00
00
55
52
00
02
28
56/6 K
00
03
78
6
Kutrabod
1556
00
02
95
1551/2
00
07
00
1604/4
00
08
46
1290/3
00
00
20
1562/2
00
00
20
1562/4
00
00
53
1388/3
00
00
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tqykbZ 6] 2013@vk"kk<+ 15] 1935
3241
1388/2,1388/4
00
02
53
1272/7
00
03
42
1618
00
01
25
1385/1,1386/1
00
01
18
1561
00
00
69
1390
00
00
37
1382,1383
00
01
63
1378/1
00
01
97
1378/4
00
02
29
1299
00
02
92
1303
00
02
44
1302
00
01
66
1304
00
02
50
1358/1
00
00
15
1523
00
00
83
7
Odekera
1097/4
00
09
90
1148/3
00
04
36
1411/3
00
00
44
1412/2
00
03
06
1414/4
00
07
56
1414/7
00
04
68
1467/3
00
04
50
1502/1
00
01
37
1502/2
00
05
16
1502/3
00
05
22
1510/2
00
01
11
244/3
00
01
80
244/6
00
01
40
244/7
00
02
60
2849/3
00
05
04
2899
00
01
97
2849/1
00
02
35
2852
00
05
28
2891/2
00
03
33
2897
00
05
58
415/3
00
01
12
495/6
00
02
10
2840 /Ka Tukdha 00
05
40
2895
00
01
32
1408/4
00
03
45
1408/1
00
01
01
1449
00
00
44
1510/2
00
01
11
1510/4
00
03
21
1513
00
01
22
1543
00
01
29
1098
00
02
46
1095
00
00
56
488
00
00
75
494/2
00
01
47
261
00
00
51
1276/2
00
05
07
195
00
00
52
31/1
00
01
44
53
00
00
58
1462/1
00
02
36
1284/2
00
00
53
1501
00
01
83
1415
00
00
62
1400
00
01
65
1397
00
00
12
44
00
01
27
197/2
00
00
56
412
00
01
15
410
00
03
09
1286/2
00
00
53
2851/2
00
02
54
2841
00
01
15
2901/2
00
07
75
1450
00
02
05
1394
00
01
12
8 Galgaladih
715/1H
00
04
46
715/1BHa
00
00
38
715/1 Anga
00
10
26
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
3242
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 6, 2013/ASHADHA 15, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
715/1Tha
00
02
73
715/1 Anda
00
01
85
698
00
00
35
700
00
03
47
9
Thathari
238
00
01
86
72
00
01
68
571
00
00
92
247
00
01
50
263/2
00
01
50
2545/2
00
08
28
597/1 Ka Tukdha 00
00
72
248
00
02
39
245
00
07
56
2024
00
29
14
2025
00
09
26
2023/KaTukdha 00
32
02
246/1
00
03
00
62, 63
00
01
72
67
00
00
40
2482
00
02
54
2520
00
02
00
2546
00
03
68
2539
00
01
50
567
00
00
58
237
00
04
01
103
00
01
18
101
00
02
51
59, 60
00
03
15
98
00
00
28
570
00
03
14
102
00
03
63
10
Guchkuliya
16
00
00
30
(Mahal-1)
11
Guchkuliya
98
00
12
97
(Mahal-2)
70
00
00
70
12
Guchkuliya
81
00
05
11
(Mahal-3)
80
00
00
26
84
00
00
20
88
00
00
84
98
00
29
16
83
00
00
74
13
Nandeli
727/1
00
02
52
(Mahal-1)
658/2
00
08
04
667
00
09
75
730
00
01
29
662
00
04
51
811
00
00
54
813
00
02
13
725
00
02
59
653
00
01
90
666
00
05
41
818
00
03
91
663
00
05
89
721
00
03
86
719
00
01
91
716
00
00
67
14
Nandeli
690
00
01
96
(Mahal-2)
692
00
00
31
700
00
09
82
17
00
10
40
15 Kotetra
322
00
00
42
261
00
01
85
748
00
06
23
310
00
03
96
810
00
00
57
329
00
15
30
38
00
19
06
317
00
05
40
911, 912/2
00
02
66
848
00
01
19
274
00
12
52
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tqykbZ 6] 2013@vk"kk<+ 15] 1935
3243
272
00
00
80
809
00
00
30
34
00
00
54
306
00
00
95
28
00
01
01
326
00
01
13
841
00
01
47
30
00
02
06
308
00
01
81
847
00
05
88
241
00
01
19
917
00
00
38
325
00
02
20
37
00
00
29
330
00
06
86
16
Tushar
145
00
01
15
438
00
00
33
66
00
02
61
439
00
01
19
455
00
02
83
77
00
02
40
137
00
01
27
373
00
00
92
404
00
00
45
642
00
05
40
16
00
05
84
136
00
01
57
144
00
01
92
460
00
01
06
423
00
00
20
67
00
00
88
140
00
09
88
134
00
00
74
456
00
03
74
458
00
00
69
416
00
00
87
111
00
02
52
115
00
00
42
17
Thuthi
581
00
07
46
571
00
04
67
678
00
06
84
83
00
09
36
578
00
03
15
650
00
18
00
569
00
05
15
559
00
07
17
544
00
00
89
580
00
02
93
665
00
17
03
545
00
02
27
673
00
06
96
557
00
00
61
552
00
04
06
[No. R-25011/ 28 /2011-OR-I]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
Je vkSj jkstxkj ea=ky;
ubZ fnYyh] 10 twu] 2013
dkñvkñ 1255-
— vkS|ksfxd fookn vfèfu;e] 1947 ¼1947
dk 14½ dh èkjk ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh; ljdkj fizUlhiy] lSUV
LVhQu dkfyt]ds izcaèra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa
ds chp] vuqcaè esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vfèdj.k@Je U;k;ky; la- 1] ubZ fnYyh ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k
141@2012½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks
06&06&2013 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[Qk- la- ,y&42012@09@2012µvkbZvkj¼Mh;w½]
tksgu rksiuks] voj lfpo
MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT
New Delhi, the 10th June, 2013
S.O. 1255.—In pursuance of Section 2A (2) of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 141/
2012) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, No. 1, New Delhi as shown in the Annexure,
in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation
to the management of The Principal, St. Stephen's College,
which was received by the Central Government on
06/06/2013.
[F.No. L-42012/09/2012-IR(DU)]
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
3244
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 6, 2013/ASHADHA 15, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
JOHAN TOPNO, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE DR. R.K. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER,
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL
TRIBUNAL NO.1, KARKARDOOMA COURTS
COMPLEX, DELHI.
I.D. No. 141/2012
Mohd. Yasin S/o Wali Mohd.
R/o Servants Quarter No. 2,
Near Principal's Residence,
St. Stephen's College,
Delhi University,
Delhi-110007
....Workman
Versus
The Principal,
St. Stephen's College,
Delhi University,
Delhi-110007
..... Management
AWARD
Mohd. Yasin works as a mess helper with St. Stephen
College, University of Delhi, since 1992. In the year 2005,
his wife suffered burn injuries. On humiliation
considerations, St. Stephen's College (hereinafter
referred to as the College) decided to accommodate him
in quarter No. 2, attached with Principal's residence, as a
temporary measure. He assured the College that he will
vacate the said quarter as and when so demanded, since
the quarter was specially ment to accommodate servants
who were attached to the Principal's residence. On
9.11.10, the Principal of the College asked Shri Yasin to
vacate the quarter. Shri Yasin did not comply with the
request. On 29.11.10, he was again asked to vacate the
quarter, which request was also not complied with. The
College filed a suit for recovery of possession against
Mohd. Yasin, which pends adjudication before Civil Judge,
Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi. Mohd. Yasin also filed a Civil
suit seeking prohibitory orders against the College, which
suit was later on withdrawn by him. Thereafter he
approached the Conciliation Officer, thereby raising an
industrial dispute before him. Since the College contested
his claim, conciliation proceedings ended into a failure.
On consideration of failure report, submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, the appropriate Govt. referred the
dispute to the Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal No. 2,
New Delhi, for adjudication, vide No. 42012/09/2012-
ID(DU) New Delhi, dated 13.09.2013, with following
terms:
"Whether the action of the Principal/Management
of St. Stephen's College, University of Delhi, Delhi asking
the workman, Mess Helper, Mohd. Yasin S/o Wali Mohd.
to vacate the quarter No.2 and non deduction of rent/
license fees thereof from salary of December, 2010
onward by the principal/management of St. Stephen's
College, University of Delhi, Delhi is justified or not? If
not, What relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"
2. Claim statement was filed by Shri Mohd. Yasin
(hereinafter referred to as the claimant) pleading therein
that he was working as mess helper with the College since
1992. His wife suffered burn injuries in the year 2005,
for which she was treated at Sunder Lal Jain Hospital,
Ashok Vihar, New Delhi. The claimant was in dire need of
a reasonable accommodation, hence applied to the
College for allotment of a staff quarter on medical
grounds. The College allotted him quarter No. 2, attached
with the Principal's residence in Feb. 2008. On 9.11.10,
the Principal asked him to vacate the quarter. He sent
suitable reply to the letter. On 24.11.10 another notice
was sent by the Principal which was also replied by him.
Legal notice dated 15.12.10 was received by him, which
was also suitably replied. The College filed a civil suit,
wherein he had taken an objection that the dispute is an
industrial dispute and civil court has no jurisdiction to try
it. He filed a civil suit against the College, which was later
on withdrawn by him. He details that the College has
started deducting license fee towards that quarter from
his salary. The College has no right to cancel allotment
of the aforesaid quarter. There are about 60 group 'D'
emloyees with the College, out of whom 41 employees
have espoused his cause. He filed claim before the
Conciliation Officer and his dispute was referred for
adjudication. He claims that the College may be directed
not to ask him to vacate quarter No. 2 attached with the
Principal's residence and to restart deduction of licence
fee from his salary as usual.
3. Claim was demurred by the College pleading that
when wife of the claimant suffered burn injuries in 2005,
the claimant was accommodate in quarter No. 2 attached
with the Pincipal's residence as a temporary arrangement
with a condition that he would vacate it as and when
required since that quarter was ment for accommodation
of servants attached to the Principals residence like cook,
gardner, driver etc. The quarter was not a part of general
pool accommodation. As per rules of allotment no quarter
is set apart from allotment, on medical grounds. The
claimant never made any application for allotment of the
quarter on medical grounds. He was called upon to vacate
that quarter by way of service of written notices, but he
failed to comply the same. The College used to deduct
nominal amount of Rs. 900 as a license fee, which was
stopped from December 2010. A civil suit for recovery
of possession of the said quarter awaits adjudication.
Provision of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (in short
the Act), are not applicable. The dispute raised by the
claimant is not an industrial dispute within the meaning
of Section 2(k) of the Act. The claimant is not entitled to
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tqykbZ 6] 2013@vk"kk<+ 15] 1935
3245
any relief, hence his claim may be dismissed, pleads the
College.
4. Vide notification No. A-11016/3/2009-CLS-II,
New Delhi dated 03-04-2013, additional charge of the
post of the Presiding Officer, Central Government
Industrial Tribunal No. II, New Delhi, was assigned to the
undersigned by the appropriate Government and thus, this
case reached this Tribunal for adjudication.
5. Arguments were heared at the bar. The claimant
with the assistance of Shri B.K. Prasad and Sh. Om Prakash
Sharma, Advocates, advanced arguments over the matter.
None come forward on behalf of the College to raise their
submission. I have given careful considerations to the
arguments advanced at the bar and cautiously passed the
record. My findings on issues involved in the controversy
are as follows.
6. On perusal of reference order No. 42012/09/
2012-ID(DU) New Delhi, dated 13.09.2013, on the
strength on which the dispute was referred for
adjudication, it came to light that the dispute was raised
by the claimant before the Conciliation Officer as on
individual workman. Failure report No. ALC-HQSP/8(16)/
11 dated 19.01.2012 has been placed over the record by
the claimant. This report project that the dispute raised
by the claimant was espoused by a group of 41 employees
of the College. To support that fact, alleged espousal letter
is also available over the record. Contents of this letter
bring it over the record that a proposal was made by 41
employees to the effect that the claimant may raise his
dispute before the Conciliation Officer and on failure of
conciliation proceedings he may get adjudication of
industrial dispute from an industrial adjudicator by
peaceful means. Therefore a question for consideration
would be as to whether the above proposal is an espousal
of the cause of the claimant by 41 employees of the
College. Before adverting to this exercise, it would be
expedient to ascertain as to what "industrial dispute"
means? For an answer, definition of the term industrial
dispute is to be construed. For sake of convenience,
definition of the term "industrial dispute", as defined by
section 2(k) of the Act, is reproduce thus:
"(k) "Industrial dispute" means any dispute or
difference between employers and employers, or between
employers and workmen, or between workmen and
workmen, which is connected with the employment or
non-employment or the terms of employment or with the
conditions of labour, of any persons,"
7. The definition of "Industrial dispute" referred
above, can be divided into four parts, viz. (i) factum of
dispute, (2) parties to the dispute, viz. (a) employers and
employers, (b) employer and workmen, or (c) workmen
and workmen, (3) subject matter of the dispute, which
should be connected with-(i) employment or non
employment, or (ii) terms of employment, or (iii)
condition of labour of any person, and (4) it should relate
to an "industry".
8. The definition of "industrial dispute" is worded
in very wide terms and unless they are narrowed by the
meaning given to word "workman" it would seem to include
all "employers", all "employments" and all "workmen",
whatever the nature or scope of the employment may be.
Therefore, except in the case where there can be a dispute
between the employers and employers and workmen and
workmen, one of the parties to an industrial dispute must
be an employee or a class of employees. The first point,
therefore, to be noted, perhaps self evident, is that the
phrase " employer and workmen", the plural may include
singular on either side or any permutation of singular or
plural, the masculine including the feminine. In order,
therefore, to determine as to whether a controversy or
difference or a dispute is an "an industrial dispute' or not,
it must first be determined whether the workman
concerned or workmen sponsoring his cause satisfy the
conditions of clause(s) of section 2 of the Act. Here in
the case, the college does not dispute that the claimant is
workman within the meaning of clause(s) of section 2 of
the Act.
9. The Apex Court put gloss on the definition of
"industrial dispute" in Dimakuchi Tea Estate [1958(1) LLJ
500] and ruled that the expression "any person" in clause
(k) of section 2 of the Act must be read subject to such
limitation and qualification as arise from the context, the
two crucial limitations are (i) the dispute must be a real
dispute between the parties to the dispute (as indicated in
the first two parts of the definition clause) so as to be
capable of selttlement or adjudication by one party to the
dispute giving necessary relief to other, and (2) the person
regarding whom the dispute is raised must be one for
whose employment, non employment, terms of
employment or conditions of labour, as case may be, the
parties dispute for a direct or substantial interest. Where
workman raised a dispute as against their employment,
the person regarding whose employment, non employer,
terms of employment or conditions of labour, the dispute
is raised need not be strictly speaking "workman" within
the meaning of the Act, but must be one in whose
employment, non employer, terms of employment, or
conditions of labour the workmen as a class have a direct
or substantial interest. The observations made by the Apex
Court are to be extracted thus:
"We also agree with the expresssion "any person" is
not co extensive with any workman, particular or
otherwise, equal with other, that the crucial test is one of
community of interest and the person regarding whom
the dispute is raised must be one in whose employment,
non employment, terms of employment, conditions of
labour (as the case may be) the parties to the dispute have
a direct or substantial interest. Whether such direct or
substantial interest has been established in a particular
case will depend on its facts and circumstances."
3246
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 6, 2013/ASHADHA 15, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
10. In Kyas Construction Company (Pvt.) Ltd.
[1958 (2) LLJ 66] Apex Court ruled that an industrial dis-
pute need not be a dispute between the employer and his
workman and that the definition of the expression "indus-
trial dispute "is wide enough to cater a dispute raised by
the employers's workman with regard to non employment
of others, who may not be employed as workman at the
relevant time. The Apex Court in Bombay Union of Jour-
nalist [1961 (ii) LLJ 436] has observed that in each case
in ascertaining whether an individual dispute has acquired
the character of an industrial dispute, the test is whether
at the date of reference, the dispute was taken up as sub-
mitted by the union of the workmen of the employer
against whom, the dispute is raised by an individual work-
man or by an appreciable number of workemn. In order,
therefore, to convert an individual dispute into an indus-
trial dispute, it has to be established that it has been taken
up by the union of employees of the establishment or by
an appreciable number of the employees of the establish-
ment. As far as union of the workmen of establishment
itself is concerned, the problem of espousal by them gen-
erally presents little difficulty, since such workmen who
are members of such unions generally have a continuity
of interest with an individual employees who is one of
their fellow workman. But difficulty arise when the cause
of a workman, in a particular establishment is sponsored
by a union which is not of the workmen of that establish-
ment but is one of which membership is open to work-
men of their establishment as well as in that industry. In
such a case a union which has only microscopic number
of the workmen as its member, cannot sponsor any dis-
pute arising between the workmen and the management.
A representative character of the union has to be gathered
from the strength of the actual number of co workers spon-
soring the dispute. The mere fact that a substantial num-
ber of workmen of the establishment in which the con-
cerned workman was employee were also members of
the union would not constitute sponsorship. It must be
shown that they were connected together and arrived at
an understanding by a resolution or by other means and
collectively submitted the dispute.
11. The expression "industrial disputes" has been
construed by the Apex Court to include individual dis-
putes, because of the scheme of the Act. In Raghu Nath
Gopal Patvardhan [1957 (1) LLJ 27] the Apex Court ruled
as to what dispute can be called as an industrial dispute. It
was laid thereon that (1) a dispute between the employer
and a single workman cannot be an industrial dispute, (2)
it can not be per-se be an industrial dispute but may be-
come if it is taken up by a trade union or a number of
workmen. In Dharampal Prem Chand [1965 (1) LLJ 668]
it was commanded by the Apex Court that a dispute raised
by a single workman cannot become an industrial dispute
unless it is supported either by his union or in the ab-
sence of a union by substantial number of workmen. Same
law was laid in the case of Indian Express Newspaper
(Pvt.) Limited [1970 (1) LLJ 132]. However in Western
India Match Company [1970 (II) LLJ 256], the Apex Court
referred the precedent in Drona Kuchi Tea Estate's case
[1958 (1) LLJ 60] and ruled that a dispute relating to "any
person becomes a dispute where the person in respect of
whom it is raised is one in whose employment, non em-
ployment, terms of employment or conditions of labour,
the parties, dispute for a direct or substantial interest".
12. What a substantial or considerable number of
workmen would be in a given case, depend on particular
facts of the case. The fact that an "industrial dispute", is
supported by other workmen will have to be established
either in the form of a resolution of the union of which
workman may be member or of the workmen themselves
who support the dispute or in any other manner. From the
mere fact that a general union, at whose instance an "in-
dustrial dispute" concerning an individual workman is re-
ferred for adjudication, has on its roll a few of the work-
men of the establishment as its members, it cannot be
inferred that the individual dispute has been converted into
an "industrial dispute". The Tribunal has therefore, to con-
sider the question as to how many of the fellow workman
actually espoused the cause of the concerned workman
by participating in the particular resolution of the Union.
In the absence of a such a determination by the Tribunal,
it cannot be said that the individual dispute acquired the
character of an industrial dispute and the Tribunal will not
acquire jurisdiction to adjudicate upon the dispute. Nev-
ertheless, in order to make a dispute an industrial dis-
pute, it is not necessary that there should always be a reso-
lution of substantial or appreciable number of workmen.
What is necessary is that there should be some express
or collective will of a substantial or an appreciable mem-
ber of the workmen treating the cause of the individual
workman as their own cause. Law to this effect was laid
in P. Somasundrameran [1970 (1) LLJ 558].
13. It is not necessary that the sponsoring union is
a registered trade union or a recognized trade union. Once
it is shown that a body of substantial number of workmen
either acting through a union or otherwise had sponsored
the workman's cause, it is sufficient to convert it into an
industrial dispute. In Pardeep Lamp Works [1970 (1) LLJ
507] complaints relating to dispute of ten workmen were
filed before the Conciliation Officer by the individual
workmen themselves. But their case was subsequently
taken up by a new union formed by a large number of co
workmen, if not a majority of them. Since this union was
not registered or recognized, the workmen elected five
representatives to prosecute the cases of ten dismissed
workmen. Thus cases of the dismissed workmen were es-
poused by the new union, yet unregistered and unrecog-
nized. The Apex Court held that the fact that these dis-
putes were not taken up by a registered or recognized union
does not mean that they were not "industrial dispute".
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tqykbZ 6] 2013@vk"kk<+ 15] 1935
3247
14. It is not expedient that same union should remain
incharge of that dispute till its adjudication. The dispute
may be espoused by the workmen of an establishment,
through a particular union for making such a dispute an
"industrial dispute", while the workman may be represented
before the Tribunal for the purpose of section 36 of the
Act by a member of executive or office bearer of altogether
another union. The crux of the matter is that the dispute
should be a dispute between the employer and his
workmen. It is not necessary that the dispute must be
espoused or conducted only by a registered trade union.
Even if a trade union ceases to be registered trade union
during the continuance of the adjudication proceedings
that would not affect the maintainability of the order of
reference. Law to this effect was laid by the High Court
of Orissa in Gammon India Limited [1974 (II) LLJ 34].
For ascertaining as to whether an individual dispute has
acquired character of an individual dispute, the test is
whether on the date of the reference the dispute was taken
up as supported by the union of the workmen of the
employer against whom the dispute is raised by the
individual workman or by an appreciable number of the
workman. In other words, the validity of the reference of
an industrial dispute must be judged on the facts as they
stood on the date of the reference and not necessarily on
the date when the cause occurs. Reference can be made
to a precedent in Western India Match Co. Ltd. [1970 (II)
LLJ 256].
15. With above prelude in mind, now it would be
ascertained as to whether the dispute was espoused by
considerable number of the workmen in the establishment
of the College. The so called espousal letter has been
termed as "support letter". Recital of support letter details
that the College is taking steps to get the quarter vacated
from the claimant. Signatories to that support letter find
that action to be unjustified. They proposed that the
claimant may raise his dispute before the Conciliation
Officer and on failure of conciliation proceedings, the
claimant may get it adjudicated from an industrial
adjudicator. This support letter nowhere projects that the
signatories have taken up the cause of the claimant as their
own. The signatories do not intend to raise grievances of
the claimant before the authorities under the Act. They
simploy advice the claimant to approach the authorities
under the Act for redressal of his grievances. It is a crystal
clear that the signatories nowhere intend to take up cause
of the claimant for redressal by way of associating
themselves in adjudication process. It is evident that this
support letter is not an espousal of the cause of the
claimant before the authorities under the Act.
16. Assuming, though no admitting that the
signatories to this support letter intends to espouse the
cause of the claimant before the authorities under the Act,
yet this support letter would not help his cause. Sub-section
(2) of Section 10 of the Act, projects that when an
industrial dispute is applied in the prescribed manner and
the appropriate Government is satisfied that the persons
applying represent the majority of each party, it shall make
the reference accordingly, Rule 3 of the Industrial Disputes
(Central) Rules 1957 (in short the Rules) projects as to
in what form an application under sub-section (2) of the
Section 10 of the Act shall be made. Rule 4 provides as to
who shall sign the said application and its accompanying
statement. For sake of convenience provisions of the
aforesaid rules are extracted thus:
"3. Application.—An application under sub-section
(2) of section 10 for the reference of an industrial dispute
to a Board, Court, Labour Court, Tribunal or National
Tribunal shall be made in Form A and shall be delivered
personally or forwarded by registered post 1 [to the
Secretary to the Government of India in the Ministry of
Labour and Employment (in triplicate)] the Chief Labour
Commissioner (Central), New Delhi, and the Regional
Labour Commissioner (Central), and the Assistant Labour
Commissioner (Central) concerned. The application shall
be accompanied by a statement setting forth—
(a)
the parties to the dispute;
(b)
the specific matters in dispute;
(c)
the total number of workmen employed in the
undertaking affected;
(d)
an estimate of the number of workmen affected
or likely to be affected by the dispute; and
(e)
the efforts made by the parties themselves to
adjust the dispute".
"4. Attestation of Application.—The application and
the statement accompanying it shall be signed—
(a)
in the case of an employer by the employer
himself, or when the employer is an
incorporated company or other body
corporate, by the agent, manager or other
principal of the Corporation.
(b)
in the case of workmen, either by the President
and Secretary of a trade union of the workmen,
or by five representatives of the workmen duly
authorised in this behalf at a meeting of the
workmen held for the purpose;
(c)
in the case of an individual workman, by the
workman himself or by any officer of the trade
union of which he is a member or by another
workman in the same establishment duly
authorised by him in this behalf:
3248
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 6, 2013/ASHADHA 15, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Provided that such workman is not a member of a
different trade union".
17. Bare reading of the aforesaid rules make it
apparent that an application in case of workmen shall
be signed either by the President and Secretary of a trade
union or by five representatives of the workmen duly
authorized in that behalf at a meeting of the workmen
held for the purpose. In case of a dispute relating to
dismissal, discharge, retrenchment or otherwise
termination of a workman by his employer, the
application may be signed by the individual workman
himself or by any officer of the trade union or by another
workman in the same establishment, duly authorized by
him in this behalf. As admitted by the claimant himself
application berfore the Conciliation Officer was signed
by him individually. It was supported by the aforesaid
support letter signed by 41 employees of the College.
It is evident that this support letter nowhere answers
requirement of rule 4 of the Rules. Form A, appended
to the rules lays emphasis that such an application is to
be signed by the President and the Secretary of the trade
union or five representatives of the workmen duly
authorized in that behalf. When claim statement, filed
before the Conciliation Officer, was not signed by the
signatories of the so called support letters, the claim
was not filed before the Conciliation Officer in
accordance with the Rules. It cannot be said that the
cliam was espoused by considerable number of
workmen in the establishment of the College, when it
was raised before the Conciliation Officer. The dispute,
so raised by the claimant, had not acquired status of an
industrial dispute. It is not a dispute which answer
parameters of Section 2A of the Act, hence the claimant
individually cannot raise it. Thus it is evident that the
dispute had not acquired status of an industrial dispute.
It remained an individual dispute. The appropriate
Government was incompetent to refer it for
adjudication. The reference order cannot grant
jurisdiction to an industrial adjudication to enter into
adjudication of the dispute. Claim statement is,
accordingly, burshed aside. An award is, passed it be
sent to the appropriate Government for publication.
Dated: 16.05.2013
Dr. R. .K. YADAV, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 10 twu] 2013
dk-vk-1256-
—vkS|ksfxd fookn vfèfu;e] 1947 ¼1947
dk 14½ dh èkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh; ljdkj izkstd~V
MkbZjsDVj] ftjdksfu;e izkstd~V ,oa vnlZ ds izcaèra= ds lac)
fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaè esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd
fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèdj.k] psUubZ ds iapkV
¼lanHkZ la[;k 19] 20] 21] 22] 35@2009 ,oa 89] 90] 91]
92@2009½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 06-06-
2013 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[Qk- la- ,y&42012@14] 15] 16] 17@2010&vkbZ vkj ¼Mh
;w½] la- ,y&42011@26@2010&vkbZ vkj ¼Mh ;w½ la- ,y-
42012@43] 44] 44] 45] 46@2009&vkbZ vkj ¼Mh ;w½]
tksgu rksiuks] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 10th June, 2013
S.O. 1256.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government
hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 19, 20, 21, 22, 35/2010 and 89, 90, 91, 92/2009) of the Central Government
Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Chennai as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers
in relation to the Project Director, Zirconium Project and others and their workman, which was received by the Central
Government on 06.06.2013.
[F.No. L-42012/14, 15, 16, 17/2010-IR(DU),
No. L-42011/26/2010-IR(DU),
No. L-42012/43, 44, 45, 46/2009-IR (DU)]
JOHAN TOPNO, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
CHENNAI
Tuesday the 30th April, 2013
Present : A.N. JANARDANAN, Presiding Officer
I.D. Nos. 19, 20, 21, 22, 35/2010 and 89, 90, 91, 92/2009
(In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2(a) of Section
10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), between the Management of Zirconium Project and their workmen.
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tqykbZ 6] 2013@vk"kk<+ 15] 1935
3249
S.
I.D. No.
Reference
1st party
Workman/
2nd Party/
Appearance
No.
No. & Date
S/Sri
Petitioner
Respondent
for Respondent
1.
19/2010
L-12012/14/
P.
Ms. D.
1. Project Director
R1 - Sri B. Sekar,
2010-IR(DU)
Pillaimuthu
Geetha, S.
Zirconium
Advocate
dated
Anbazhagan,
Project
29.04.2010
Advocates
2. The Security
R2-M/s R.
Officer, M/s
Jayaprakash, K.
Alagu Security
Srinivasan, Advocates
Services, Tuticorin
2.
20/2010
L-42012/15/
G.
Ms. D.
1. Project Director
R1 - Sri B. Sekar,
2010-IR(DU)
Sahayaraj
Geetha, S.
Zirconium
Advocate
dated
Anbazhagan,
Project
29.04.2010
Advocates
2. The Security
R2-M/s R.
Officer, M/s
Jayaprakash, K.
Alagu Security
Srinivasan, Advocates
Services, Tuticorin
3.
21/2010
L-42012/16/
M.A.G. Boras Ms. D.
1. Project Director
R1 - Sri B. Sekar,
2010-IR(DU)
Geetha, S.
Zirconium
Advocate
dated
Anbazhagan,
Project
29.04.2010
Advocates
2. The Security
R2-M/s R.
Officer, M/s
Jayaprakash, K.
Alagu Security
Srinivasan, Advocates
Services, Tuticorin
4.
22/2010
L-42012/17/
E. Paulsamy
Ms. D.
1. Project Director
R1 - Sri B. Sekar,
2010-IR(DU)
Geetha, S.
Zirconium
Advocate
dated
Anbazhagan,
Project
29.04.2010
Advocates
2. The Security
R2-M/s R.
Officer, M/s
Jayaprakash, K.
Alagu Security
Srinivasan, Advocates
Services, Tuticorin
5.
35/2010
L-42011/26/
Mavatta
Ms. D.
1. Project Director
R1 - Sri B. Sekar,
2010-IR(DU)
Pothu
Geetha, S.
Zirconium
Advocate
dated
Thozhilalar
Anbazhagan,
Project
21.09.2010
Sangam
Advocates
2. The Security
R2-M/s R.
Tuticorin
Officer, M/s
Jayaprakash, K.
Alagu Security
Srinivasan, Advocates
Services, Tuticorin
6.
89/2009
L-42012/43/
Lionel John
Ms. D.
1. Project Director
R1 - Sri B. Sekar,
2009-IR(DU)
Thanamani
Geetha, S.
Zirconium
Advocate
dated
Anbazhagan,
Project
23.10.2010
Advocates
2. The Security
R2-M/s R.
Officer, M/s
Jayaprakash, K.
Alagu Security
Srinivasan, Advocates
Services, Tutirorin
7.
90/2009
L-42012/44/
S. Nelson
Ms. D.
1. Project Director
R1 - Sri B. Sekar,
2009-IR(DU)
Geetha, S.
Zirconium
Advocate
dated
Anbazhagan,
Project
23.10.2010
Advocates
2. The Security
R2-M/s R.
Officer, M/s
Jayaprakash, K.
Alagu Security
Srinivasan, Advocates
Services, Tuticorin
8.
91/2009
L-42012/45/
P. Nainar
Ms. D.
1. Project Director
R1 - Sri B. Sekar,
2009-IR(DU)
Geetha, S.
Zirconium
Advocate
dated
Anbazhagan,
Project
23.10.2010
Advocates
2. The Security
R2-M/s R.
Officer, M/s
Jayaprakash, K.
Alagu Security
Srinivasan, Advocates
Services, Tuticorin
3250
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 6, 2013/ASHADHA 15, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
9.
92/2009
L-42012/46/
T. Chendur
Ms. D.
1. Project Director
R1 - Sri B. Sekar,
2009-IR(DU)
Pandi
Geetha, S.
Zirconium
Advocate
dated
Anbazhagan,
Project
23.10.2010
Advocates
2. The Security
R2-M/s R.
Officer, M/s
Jayaprakash, K.
Alagu Security
Srinivasan, Advocates
Services, Tuticorin
COMMON AWARD
The Central Government, Ministry of Labour and
Employment vide the above order of references referred
the IDs mentioned above to this Tribunal for adjudication.
The schedule mentioned in the order of reference
in the above IDs are as under:
ID 19/2010
"Whether the contract between the management of
Project Director, Zirconium Project and their
contractor with regard to employment of Sri P.
Pillaimuthu is sham and bogus? If yes, whether the
action of the management in terminating the
services of the said workman w.e.f. 20.05.2009 is
legal and justified? If not, what relief the workman
is entitled to?"
ID 20/2010
"Whether the contract between the management of
Project Director, Zirconium Project and their
contractor with regard to employment of Sri G.
Sahayaraj is sham and bogus? If yes, whether the
action of the management in terminating the
services of the said workman w.e.f. 20.05.2009 is
legal and justified? If yes, what relief the workman
is entitled to?"
ID 21/2010
"Whether the contract between the management of
Project Director, Zirconium Project and their
contractor with regard to employment of Sri M.A.G.
Boras is sham and bogus? If yes, whether the action
of the management in terminating the services of
the said workman w.e.f. 20.05.2009 is legal and
justified? If not, what relief the workman is entitled
to?"
ID 22/2010
"Whether the contract between the management of
Project Director, Zirconium Project and their
contractor with regard to employment of Sri E.
Paulsamy is sham and bogus? If yes, whether the
action of the management in terminating the
services of the said workman w.e.f. 20.05.2009 is
legal and justified? If not, what relief the workman
is entitled to?"
ID 35/2010
"Whether the contract between the management of
Zirconium Project, Tuticorin and their contractor
M/s Alagu Security Services (P) Ltd. Chennai with
regard to employment of 45 security staffs (as
annexed) is sham and bogus? If yes, whether the
action of the management and contractor, in
terminating the services of said workmen, is legal
and justified? If not, what relief the workmen are
entitled to?"
ID 89/2009
"Whether the contract between the management of
Zirconium Complex and M/s Alagu Security
Services (P) Ltd., with respect to employment of
Sri A. Lionel John Thanamani is sham and bogus? If
yes, whether the action of the management in
terminating the services of the above workman
w.e.f. 01.05.2009 is legal and justified? If not, what
relief the workman is entitled to?"
ID 90/2009
"Whether the contract between the management of
Zirconium Complex and M/s Alagu Security
Services (P) Ltd. with respect to employment of
Sri S. Nelson is sham and bogus? If yes, whether
the action of the management in terminating the
services of the above workman w.e.f. 01.05.2009
is legal and justified? If not, what relief the workman
is entitled to?"
ID 91/2009
"Whether the contract between the management of
Zirconium Complex and M/s Alagu Security
Services (P) Ltd. With respect of employment of
Sri P. Nainar is sham and bogus? If yes, whether the
action of the management in terminating the
services of the above workman w.e.f. 28.04.2009
is legal and justified? If not what relief the workman
is entitled to?"
ID 92/2009
"Whether the contract between the management of
Zirconium Complex and M/s Alagu Security
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tqykbZ 6] 2013@vk"kk<+ 15] 1935
3251
Services (P) Ltd. With respect to employment of
Sri T. Chendur Pandi is sham and bogus? If yes,
whether the action of the management in terminating
the services of the above workman w.e.f. 01.05.2009
is legal and justified? If not, what relief the workman
is entitled to?"
2. After the receipt of Industrial Disputes, this
Tribunal has numbered it as ID 19, 20, 21, 22, 35 of 2010
and 89, 90, 91 and 92 of 2009 and issued notices to both
sides. Both sides entered appearance through their
Advocates and filed their Claim statements and separate
Counter Statements as the case may be. The Counsel for
the petitioners filed a memo stating that the workmen
whose case is espoused individually or by the Union seek
the same relief against the same Management and the
nature of the dispute is also the same. Joint enquiry will
help the petitioners and the Management to adduce
common evidence and it is prayed that the same be
allowed. The Respondents endorsed no objection to the
demand. On the side of the petitioners WW1 was
examined, common evidence was recorded in ID 35/2010
and Ex.W1 to Ex.W31 were marked. On the side of the
Respondents, MW1 and MW2 were examined in common
and Ex.M1 to Ex.M9 (series) and Ex.M10 and Ex.M11
marked. The award, herein, accordingly is passed as
common award for all the IDs and a complete copy of the
same containing the signature of the Presiding officer
will be kept in each of the separate ID file.
3. The averments in the Claim Statements in ID 35/
2010 mostly common or the same in all, but with minor
variations of individual particulars briefly read as
follows :
The petitioners viz. S/Sri P. Pillaimuthu, G.
Sahayaraj, M.A.G. Boras, E Paulsamy, Lionel John
Thanamanai, S. Nelson, P. Nainar, T. Chenthur Pandi,
Mavatta Pothu Thozhilalar Sangam (covering 45
workmen) joined the service of the Respondent.
Petitioner Pillaimuthu was employed under the First
Respondent as Security Guard from October 2008 through
the Contractor. From 20.05.2009 the Respondent did not
allow him to work and orally terminated his service.
Petitioner G. Sahayaraj was employed under the First
Respondent as Security Guard from 01.10.2007 through
the Contractor. From 20.05.2009 the Respondent did not
allow him to work and orally terminated his service.
Petitioner M.A.G. Boras was employed under the First
Respondent as Security Guard from October 1991 through
the Contractor. From 20.05.2009 the Respondent did not
allow him to work and orally terminated his service.
Petitioner E. Paulsamy was employed under the First
Respondent as Security Guard from December 1999
through the Contractor. From 20.05.2009 the Respondent
did not allow him to work and orally terminated his
service. Petitioner Lionel John Thanamanai was employed
under the First Respondent as Security Guard from
01.12.1991 through the Contractor. From 01.05.2009 the
Respondent did not allow him to work and orally
terminated his service. Petitioner S. Nelson was employed
under the First Respondent as Security Guard from
18.02.1998 through the Contractor. From 01.05.2009 the
Respondent did not allow him to work and orally
terminated his service. Petitioner P. Nainar was employed
under the First Respondent as Security Guard from
15.04.1990 through the Contractor. From 01.05.2009 the
Respondent did not allow him to work and orally
terminated his service. Petitioner Chendur Pandi was
employed under the First Respondent as Security Guard
from 21.04.1997 through the Contractor. From
01.05.2009 the Respondent did not allow him to work
and orally terminated his service. The cause of 45 workers
as per the list attached with the Claim Statement in ID 35/
2010 is espoused by the General Secretary of the Union,
Mavatta Pothu Thozhilalar Sangam. These 45 workers
were employed under the Respondents since they are
members of the Petitioner Union. The First Respondent
is a project of Deptt. of Atomic Energy of the Union
Government, which was proposed to be established in
1990 in Tuticorin. Even before establishing the factory
the First Respondent engaged initially 5 local people as
Security Guards. They were utilized for all the manual
works. The total project area extends to 1300 acres/526
acres. Needing more Security Guards R1 recruited more
hands in 1991. Initially those engaged as Security Guards
were utilized by R1 to do all odd and sundry jobs at project
site assisting the revenue officials, measuring the site,
cooking, movement of files, etc. when there were no basic
facilities like drinking water, electricity and gravel road
amenities. They assisted the Officers of the R1 from the
very inception of the project viz. surveying the land and
clearing the jungle, etc. as a perennial natured and essential
service work. Though engaged by the First Respondent
wages were paid through Topaz Security Services. They
were not aware of the consequences of the distinction
between the First and Second Respondent. From 1990 to
1997 (20 per day) Topaz Security Service, Madurai was
given contract and they paid wages to the workers and
from 1997 to 2000 (Rs. 30/- per day), the Second
Respondent was given contract and from 2000 to 2003
(Rs. 40/-) per day Federal Security Bureau, Madras and
from 2003-2008 (Rs. 80/- per day) to Topaz Security
Services and from January 2009 till termination
(Rs. 3720/- per month) to the Second Respondent was
given contract which was said to be for one year. Though
several contractors were there the workers continued
under all of them employed in the First Respondent
premises. The contract between the First and Second
Respondent is a sham and fraud denying them legal
benefits. The workers-security guards joined the Union
in 2007. Demand was made for minimum wages, canteen
facilities, wages for weekly off and paid holidays and
3252
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 6, 2013/ASHADHA 15, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
absorption under R1. Asst. Labour Commissioner during
his visit in September 2008 after enquiry directed R2 to
pay Rs. 120/- instead of Rs. 80/- and the differences for
October and November 2008. In July 2009 on a strike
notice on 25.07.2009 in the conciliation initiated by ALC
the 45 workers were terminated from service violating
Section-33 of the ID Act. No prior permission had been
obtained by the Respondents. Workers had rendered more
than 10 years of service under R1. R1 industry is
producing Zirconium metal from Zirconium available in
beach sand deposits where R1 does the mining of the
beach sand and process the same to get Zirconium Oxide
further processed to manufacture Zirconium Sponge. The
Mines Act 1952 is applicable to the Zirconium
Management industry. Mines Act defines the Agency under
Section-2(c) and mine under Section-2 from which it is
clear that Mines Act does not distinguish between a person
employed through an Agent or employed directly by an
owner. The workmen engaged through the Second
Respondent contract also come under the definition of
person employed. R1 engaged more than 100 workmen
in their industry and it is project of Nuclear Fuel Complex,
a major industrial unit of Deptt. of Atomic Energy. R1 is
an industrial establishment. The very contract between the
First Respondent and the Second Respondent, the fact that
CISF personnel are brought in the place of these workmen
also establishes that the job of Security Service is an
inevitable job under R1. The CISF is supposed to be
engaged only at the plant site and the Zirconium
Management is proposing to call for new tender to contract
out the security service of township area. The malafide
motive of R1 is thus clear. The action is only to punish
the workers for joining the Union raising demands. It is
unfair labour practice of the R1. The workmen are in
difficult situation to make their both ends meet. Fresh
recruitments were made for the post of Security Staff
after their termination. They are remaining unemployed.
Engagement is against the provisions of CLRA Act. Their
termination is illegal and unjustified violating Section-
25N, 25G, 25H and 33 of ID Act. Hence it is to be held
that the contract is sham and bogus and the termination is
illegal and unjustified directing the reinstatement of the
workmen with all benefits.
4. Counter Affidavit averments of the First
Respondent bereft of unnecessary details are as follows :
Petition is not maintainable in law or on facts. For
reasons of strategic importance Department of Atomic
Energy is vested with some special provisions and it is
the policy of the department that all the operating units
under it are guarded by paramilitary forces like Central
Industrial Security Force. Initially pending approval of
Ministry of Home Affairs sanctioning CISF for Zirconium
Complex, Palayakayal, private security had been depended
upon for preventing trespass as well as security of the
construction materials lying on the open ground extending
to 1300 acres acquired in the year 1991. Private Security
Agencies were engaged on open tender basis under which
in the past (i) M/s. Topaz Security Services, (ii) M/s. Alagu
Security Services (P) Ltd. (iii) M/s. Federal Security
Bureau had been engaged from time to time during
different periods commencing from 1991 to 2009.
Second Respondent was appointed on 31.12.2008 and an
agreement was entered into between it and on behalf of
Respondent No. 1 by Nuclear Fuel Complex for providing
security at a cost of Rs. 40,84,800 per annum for
employing 63 personnel to work on round the clock shifts.
The arrangement was for a period of 1 year w.e.f.
01.01.2009 or till induction of Central Industrial Security
Force in the complex of Palayakayal whichever was earlier.
As per Para-8 of the agreement the security personnel
were governed by terms and conditions of service entered
into with Respondent No. 2. Under no account any claim
or lien or service liability or compensation in respect of
their employment will lie against the Respondent No. 1.
Also, Respondent No. 2 shall abide by all Central and State
Acts, Schemes, Rules and Regulations made there under
pertaining to employment of labour/security personnel
and shall be responsible for payment of contributions for
Provident Fund, compensation and claim arising out of
such enactments, etc. Respondent No. 2 shall maintain
proper records, register of accounts in respect of the
personnel engaged by them for security services in the
premises of the Zirconium Complex as warranted by all
statutory enactments and shall furnish the same to
Respondent No. 1 for verification on demand. After four
months of the agreement R2 on 30.04.2009 served a
conditional notice on NFC either to increase contractual
amount by Rs. 40,000 per month on the ground that R2
was incurring a loss of Rs. 40,000 or to terminate the
agreement and requested the firm to be relieved from
01.08.2009. Since R2 agreed for a consolidated amount
of Rs. 40,84,800 including Service Tax request of R2
could not be acceded to. Hence the termination was
accepted and communication dated 25.07.2009 was given.
In view of recent terrorist attack in Mumbai using sea
route and also the threat perception by the terrorist
organizations to the strategic units of DAE, NFC on behalf
of Respondent No. 1 has expedited and inducted CISF on
20.07.2009 in conformity with the policy of the
department that no project site is left without security.
During the force of the contract R2 transferred some of
its Security Guards who have subsequently raised disputes.
In fact according to R2 services of some of its Security
Guards were not terminated but they have been intimated
to come and report for duty at Chennai vide letter dated
12.09.2009. R2 was ready to accommodate the Security
Guards transferred elsewhere since they had no other unit
in Tuticorin after termination of the agreement dated
31.07.2009. Hence the question of termination will not
come into picture either by R1 or R2 as stated by
petitioner. R2 has also written letter dated 15.08.2009 to
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tqykbZ 6] 2013@vk"kk<+ 15] 1935
3253
the Petitioner Union to advise the Security Guards to
report for duty without any further delay. R2 agreed to
provide the Security Guards with minimum educational
qualifications of 8th Standard whereas the Guards were
having less than the minimum qualification. Hence R2
asked them to report at Chennai branch. To the Security
Guards engaged through private security contractors from
1991 to 31.07.2009 payment was made by contractors
only. R1 never paid any payment. There was no employer
employee relationship between R1 and the Private
Security Guards. R1 also ensured payment of minimum
wages by R2. Demand for minimum wages, weekly off,
paid holidays and absorption under R1 is a futile exercise.
There is no question of termination by R1 or reinstatement
by R1. Security Guards were simply workers under
various Contractors. There being no mining activity by
R1 it will not fall under mine. Mines Act provisions do
not apply. ID Act is not applicable to R1 since contract
labourers are not its employees. In view of termination
having been served and accepted by R2, conciliation
proceedings initiated by RLC in response to strike notice
dated 25.07.2009 of the Petitioner Union to go on strike
from 11.08.2009 is not maintainable Hence there is no
question of termination of 45 workers in violation of
Section-33 of the ID Act. The agreement between R2 and
that on behalf of Respondent is not sham. The notice of
termination of contract served by R2 had to be accepted
by NLC. There is no question of unfair labour practice.
CISF has already been inducted for safeguarding the
factory premises of Respondent No. 1. There is no
provision dealing with the regularization of workmen as
defined in Section-2(1)(b) of Contract Labour
(Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970. No right is
conferred upon the contract labour to claim regularization
in contravention of the provisions of the Contract Labour
Act by Contractor or by the Establishment. The guards
cannot invoke theory of legitimate expectation or
regularization when appointment could be made only as
per selection process. Question of invoking Section-25N
or 25L does not arise. The process of the Zirconium
project is not a perennial one. The Atomic Power Plant
establishment being very sensitive and security of which
is to be governed by CISF as decided by Home Ministry
in the context of present day security threats from within
and outside the country, the private security guards-
contract workers cannot claim employment. The claim is
to be dismissed.
5. Counter Statement averments of the Second
Respondent briefly read as follows:
Petitioner suppressed material facts. R2 as
successful tenderer entered into an agreement on
01.01.2009 with R1 to provide complete security
coverage for their project area and had engaged 56
Security Guards, 6 Asstt. Security Officers and 1 Security
Officer. R1 terminated the contract w.e.f. 31.07.2009 and
thereupon R2 sent letters dated 19.10.2010 to all
employees individually and advised them to report at
Chennai which they did not comply. They insisted to be
employed under R1 and alleged to have been terminated
from service. R2 never terminated them and is ready to
provide job. It is denied that contract between and R1 and
R2 is sham and fraud. Demand of minimum wages has
already been settled between the parties. There is no
violation of Section-33 of the ID Act. There is no unfair
labour practice. The dispute is not maintainable as Central
Government is not an appropriate authority as regards R2
contractor is concerned. Claim is to be dismissed.
6. Points for consideration are :
(i)
Whether the contract between the
Management of Zirconium Project and their
various Contractors such as M/s Alagu
Security Services (P) Ltd., with regard to
employment of Security Staff as in the
Annexure to ID 35/2010 and the other
connected IDs is sham and bogus?
(ii) Whether the action of the management and
contractor in terminating the services of said
workmen is legal and justified?
(iii) To what relief the concerned workmen are
entitled?
7. Joint enquiry of the ID 35/2010 with ID Nos. 19,
20, 21 and 22/2010 and ID Nos. 89, 90, 91 and 92/2009
was allowed on 08.07.2011 as per order on memo filed
by the petitioner as conceded to by the Respondents 1 &
2 by endorsement on the same.
8. Common evidence in all the IDs was recorded in
ID 35/2010 consisting of the testimony of WW1 and
Ex.W1 to Ex.W31 on the side of the petitioners and the
oral evidence of MW1 and MW2 and Ex.M1 to Ex.M7,
Ex.M8 (series), Ex.M9 (series), Ex.M10 and Ex.M11 on
the side of the Respondents.
9. Points (i), (ii) and (iii)
Heard both sides. Perused the records, documents,
evidence and written arguments on the side of the R-1.
The prominent arguments on behalf of the petitioner
include that the Principal Employer having not got
registered for entering into contract labour and Contractor
not shown to have obtained the license that independent
contractor was engaged to supply contract agreement to
the First Respondent does not stand substantiated. In the
absence of any license there cannot be a valid contract. In
the absence of compliance with the provisions there
cannot be a valid contract and the same is only sham. When
according to MW1, the overall functional control over
the contract labour is exercised by First Respondent,
Principal Employer it is indicative of the fact that the
contract is only sham and nominal and that the workers
3254
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 6, 2013/ASHADHA 15, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
are direct workers under the Management. According to
MW2, First Respondent has disciplinary control and it
only shows that the workers are again direct workers under
the First Respondent. Even when without any instruction
from the First Respondent to engage the same set of
contract workers yet the same workers are engaged under
different Contractors and the said fact is indicative of the
fact that the workers are under the First Respondent. The
Attendance Sheets spreading over periods show at the end
of the page signature of the authority of the First
Respondent. The post of Security Staff is with perennial
natured work and not seasonal. If there is no vacancy now
at the planned site. they can be engaged in the township
They remained engaged for more than 10 years.
10. Reliance was placed on behalf of the petitioner
to the decisions of the Apex Court in:
BHILWARA DUGDH UTPADAK SAHAKARI S.
LTD. Vs. VINOD KUMAR SHARMA DEAD BY L.RS.
AND OTHERS (AIR-2011-SC-3546) wherein Apex Court
held "2. This Appeal has been filed against the impugned
judgments dated 23.08.2004 and dated 21.09.2004 passed
by the High Court of Judicature at Rajasthan. 3. This
Appeal reveals the unfortunate state of affairs prevailing
in the file of labour relations in our country. 4. In order to
avoid their liability under various labour statutes
employers are very often resorting to subterfuge by trying
to show that their employees are, in fact, the employees
of a contractor. It is high that this subterfuge must come
to an end. 5. Labour statutes were meant to protect the
employees/workmen because it was realized that the
employers and the employees are not on an equal
bargaining position. Hence, protection of employee as
required so that they may not be exploited. However, this
new technique of subterfuge has been adopted by some
employers in recent years in order to deny the rights of
the workmen under various labour statutes by showing
that the concerned workmen are not their employees but
are the employees/workmen of a contractor, or that they
are merely daily wage or short term or casual employees
when in fact they are doing the work of regular
employees".
SECRETARY, HARYANA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD
Vs. SURESH AND OTHERS (1999-2-LLN-612) wherein
it held "Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act,
1970, S.10 — Concept of contract labour and its effect
— Electricity Board of Haryana in order to keep its plants
and stations clean and hygienic, awarding the work to a
contractor— Work not of seasonal nature — Contract
itself stipulating number of employees to be engaged for
the said work — Overall control of working of contract
labour including administrative control remaining with the
Board — Board neither registered as principal-employer
nor contractor was licensed contractor — Held, on lifting
the veil its clear that there was no contract system with
the Board as work was of perennial nature — Contractor
has to be kept out — So-called contract system was only
a camouflage — Employer-employee relationship is
easily visualized — Employees who have worked for more
than 240 days in a year are entitled to be absorbed
permanently in the Board."
11. On behalf of the Respondent the conspicuous
arguments advanced include that it is on a contract for
agreement with Second Respondent that security
personnel were engaged to work on round-the-clock for
one year. As per Para-8 of the agreement the security
personnel were governed by terms and conditions of
service with no claim or lien for service liability or
compensation. R2 was bound to abide by rules and
regulations including maintenance of records, registers
furnishing the same to Rl. The agreement was terminated
for valid reasons after four months. Thereupon the
proposal to induct CISF as per the policy of the department
was brought about. R2 had transferred some of its security
guards elsewhere since they had no other unit in Tuticorin
but they did not report for duty there. R1 never maintained
Attendance Registers or Wage Registers of Security
Guards. Decision on deployment and control on shift
working were not of Rl. No appointment order has been
issued by R1. There is no disciplinary control over the
Security Guards by R1. Direct disbursement of wages was
not made by R1. The Zirconium project is never a perennial
one. Being very sensitive the security of the area is to be
governed by CISF as decided by the Home Ministry.
Private contract workers cannot be employed there. Now
the unit has gone on stream and is controlled by
Government Specialist Security Services. There is no
employer-employee relationship between R1 and the
Contract Labour. There is no contract with labourers and
R1.
12. Considering the pros and cons of the contentions
on either side and on the scrutiny of the records,
documents and evidence, I am led to the conclusion that
there is no force in the contentions on behalf of the
petitioner. With the commencement of the unit at
Palayakayal engagement of some security personnel
having become necessary for various purposes connected
with the safety and security of the materials there was
started engagement of some private men as security guards
initially from the locality and thereafter through the
independent contractors. The engagement of contract
labour through independent contractors is shown to be in
accordance with valid contracts specifying the terms and
conditions of such engagement. Though there is need of
registration and obtaining of license by the independent
contractor the specific case of the Respondent is that
license has been obtained though not produced. Though
there has been no proof of the fact of license having been
obtained and for registration made by the Principal
Employer to give rise to the commencement of the
contract labour system in the establishment, that perse is
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tqykbZ 6] 2013@vk"kk<+ 15] 1935
3255
not to substantiate that system has not commenced there.
The Respondent has been able to substantiate that despite
the prevalence of the contract labour system under the
establishment why it had to switch over to avoiding private
contract labour and to engage Government Specialist
Security Services. When specialist security guards are
appointed from among CISF personnel no doubt it is not
with an object of denying the benefits that might be
payable to the private security guards that they were
engaged and continued as contract labour. Marginal
discrepancie in the versions of witnesses tending to show
that there has been some control of First Respondent over
the work of the contract labour or such other
circumstances are not apt to lead to the conclusion that
the contract labour is capable of being considered as
directly employed under the First Respondent. Even with an
attempt to pierce the veil, if any, centering round the contract
for supply of labour at no stretch of imagination it can be
concluded that there is no real contract and that the contract
is mere sham or a camouflage. Therefore, I hold that the
contract between the Management of Project Director,
Zirconium Complex and their Contractor with regard to the
employment of the contract labour is not sham and bogus.
There is no termination of them by R1. The termination of
the contract labour by Contractor is a misnomer in that due
to absence of employment at the original place of
engagement they were being transferred to new stations or
Chennai at which they have not joined duty. Hence they kept
out of employment of their own volition only and there is no
actual termination by the Contractor. Consequently, the
workmen are not entitled to any relief.
13. The reference is answered accordingly.
(Dictated to the P.A., transcribed and typed by him,
corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on
this day the 30th April, 2013)
A. N. JANARDANAN, Presiding Officer
Witnesses Examined:
For the 1st Party/Petitioner
WW1, Sri T. Kurukkalanji
For the 2nd Party/Management MW1, Sri K.P.S.
Pillai
MW2, Sri S. Jayarajan
Documents Marked :
On the petitioner's side
Ex.No.
Date
Description
Ex.W1
31.03.2007
Advertisement in the news paper
Ex.W2
16.03.2009
Application called for absorption
Ex.W3
April 2009
Dispute raised by Nelson
Ex.W4
30.04.2009
Telegram sent by Mr. Lionel
John Dhanamani
Ex.W5
30.04.2009
Order passed in MP No. 1/2009
in WP 7252/2009
Ex.W6
22.06.2009
Conciliation of notice —
Nelson
Ex.W7
25.07.2009
Strike notice issued by the Union
Ex.W8
25.07.2009
Strike notice issued to the
Respondents
Ex.W9
28.07.2009
Conciliation notice
Ex.W10 31.07.2009
Failure Report
Ex.W11 15.08.2009
Letter by the First Respondent
to the Petitioner Union
Ex.W12 12.09.2009
Letter from the First Respondent
Ex.W13 24.09.2009
Letter to disburse the wages
Ex.W14 08.10.2009
Letter to the Second Respondent
regarding wages
Ex.W15 08.10.2009
2K Petition regarding bonus
Ex.W16 11.12.2009
Rejoinder filed by the Union
Ex.W17 11.12.2009
Reply
from
the
Second
Respondent
Ex.W18 21.12.2009
Letter from ACL to the Second
Respondent
Ex.W19 05.02.2010
Letter from the First Respondent
regarding attendance register
Ex.W20 12.02.2010
Complaint regarding wages
Ex.W21 10.06.2010
Conciliation notice
Ex.W22 12.08.2010
Reply from the Respondents
Ex.W23 16.08.2010
Conciliation notice
Ex.W24
Employment certificate issued
by the First Respondent and
other Contractors
Ex.W25 —
Bonus payable from 01.04.2007
to 31.12.2008
Ex.W26 —
Application by M.K. Pandian
Ex.W27 —
Application by Kurukalanji
Ex.W28 —
Attendance register from March
1998
Ex.W29 —
List of Members Union
Ex.W30 16.02.2010
Order passed in W.A.No. 672 of
2009
Ex.W31 —
List of Security Staff working in
NFC
Ex.No.
Date
Description
3256
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 6, 2013/ASHADHA 15, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
On the Management's side
Ex.No.
Date
Description
Ex.M1
31.12.2008
Acceptance letter for providing
complete security measure to
the project and township site of
Zirconium Complex by the
Chief Administrative Officer on
behalf of the President of India
to the 2nd Respondent
Ex. M2 01.01.2009
Agreement
between
the
Department of Atomic Energy,
Government of India and 2nd
Respondent
Ex.M3
30.04.2009
Requisition letter by the 2nd
Respondent to re-consider the
quoted rate/termination notice to
the Department of Atomic
Energy, Government of India,
Hyderabad
Ex. M4 28.05.2009
Reply submitted before the
Asstt. Labour Commissioner
(C), Madurai by the 1st
Respondent with reference to the
letter dated 21.05.2009
Ex.M5
25.07.2009
Requisition letter by the Chief
Administrative Officer for
termination of contract to the
2nd Respondent
Ex.M6
12.09.2009
Letter sent to the Chief
Administrative Officer by the
2nd Respondent with regard to
the status and dispute raised by
the petitioner with ACL, Madurai
Ex.M7
09.05.2008
Copy of the advertisement
issued by the 1st Opposite Party
together with the tender
documents
Ex.M8
17.04.2009
Copies of the said transfer letters
issued to the petitioners in ID
Nos. 89 (series)to 92 of 2009
and ID Nos. 19 to 22 of 2010
Ex.M9
19.08.2010
Copies of the letters sent by the
2nd Opposite Party to the
petitioners covered by the above
disputes advising them to report
at Chennai together with
acknowledgements/returned
covers
Ex.M10 12.08.2010
Copy of the Counter Statement
filed by the 2nd Opposite Party
before the Assistant Labour
Commissioner
Ex.M11 14.09.2010
Copy of the Counter Statement
filed by the 2nd Opposite Party
before the Assistant Labour
Commissioner
ubZ fnYyh] 10 twu] 2013
dk-vk-1257-
—vkS|ksfxd fookn vfèfu;e] 1947 ¼1947
dk 14½ dh èkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh; ljdkj ,XthD;wfVo
bUthfu;j ¼bZ½] lh-ih-MCyw-Mh- ds izcaèra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj
muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaè esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh;
ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèdj.k u- 1] ubZ fnYyh ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k
31@97½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 06-06-2013
dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[Qk- la- ,y&42011@93@1995&vkbZ vkj ¼Mh ;w½]
tksgu rksiuks] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 10th June, 2013
S.O. 1257.—In pursuance of Section 2A(2) of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 31/
97) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum
Labour Court No. 1, NEW DELHI as shown in the
Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers
in relation to the management of The Executive Engineer
(E), CPWD, which was received by the Central
Government on 06/06/2013.
[F. No. L-42011/93/1995-IR(DU)]
JOHAN TOPNO, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE DR. R.K. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER,
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL
TRIBUNAL NO. 1, KARKARDOOMA COURTS,
COMPLEX DELHI
I.D. No. 31/97
The General Secretary,
CPWD Karamchari Union,
C-15, Bhai Veer Singh Marg,
Goal Market,
New Delhi-110001.
Workman...
Versus
The Executive Engineer (E),
Hot Mix Ashphalt Plant Division
Ex.No.
Date
Description
(series)
(series)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tqykbZ 6] 2013@vk"kk<+ 15] 1935
3257
CPWD, I.P. Bhawan,
New Delhi-110002.
Management...
AWARD
Executive Engineer (Electrical), Mechanical &
Workshop Division, Central Public Works Department
(in short the management) engaged Shri Jaipal Saran as
Assistant Operator on muster roll with effect from
01.01.1979, purely on temporary basis. Regular post of
Khalasi was offered to him by the management, vide letter
dated 16.04.1984. Shri Jaipal Saran accepted that offer
and joined on the post of khalasi with effect from
17.08.1984. Shri Sudama Manjhi and Shri Ram Krishan,
engaged as Assistant Operator on muster roll in 1981 and
1982 respectively, were also offered posts of Khalasi,
which offer was not accepted by them. Subsequently they
were regularized on the posts of Assistant Operator by
the management in the year 1993. Shri Jaipal Saran felt
aggrieved and raised a demand on the management seeking
regularization on the post of Operator. When his demand
was not conceded to, he approached the CPWD
Karamchari Union (in short the union) for redressal of
his grievance. The union espoused his cause and raised a
dispute before the Conciliation Officer. Since the dispute
was contested by the management, conciliation
proceedings ended into a failure. On consideration of
failure report, submitted by the Conciliation Officer, the
appropriate Government referred the dispute to this
Tribunal for adjudication vide order No.-42011/93/95/
1R(DU), New Delhi dated 24.02.1997 with following
terms:
"Whether action of the management of the
Superintending Engineer Electrical, Co-ordination circle
(Electrical) and Executive Engineer (Electrical) Hot Mix
Ashphalt Plant Division, C.P.W.D„ New Delhi in not
counting the service period of Shri Jaipal Saran, Khalasi
as Assistant Operator and thereafter as Operator is
justified? If not, what relief the concerned workman is
entitled to?"
2. Claim statement was filed by Shri Jaipal Saran
pleading therein that he is a member of scheduled caste.
He was recruited through employment exchange against
direct recruitment quota on sanctioned post of Assistant
Operator on muster roll during September 1978. Though
he would have been recruited against quota available for
scheduled caste as Assistant Operator against regular post
yet management violated labour laws and forced him to
continue as daily wager Assistant Operator on muster roll.
He was kept as daily wage from September 1978 to
11.08.1984. The said act of the management amounts to
unfair labour practice. He discharged his duties honestly
to the entire satisfaction of his superiors. His services
were appreciated from time to time.
3. He projects that on 12.08.1984, he was
deliberately coerced to join duties as regular work charged
Khalasi. The said act on the part of the management also
amounts to unfair labour practice, for which they are liable
to be prosecuted. He was eligible/entitled for
regularization as Assistant Operator from the date of
initial appointment in September 1978 in pursuance of
memo No.63/01/168-NCS II, dated 31.01.1969. Shri
Sudama Manjhi and Shri Ram Krishan, appointed in 1981
and 1982 as Khalasi on muster roll, were promoted as
Operator in 1993. They were neither members of
scheduled caste nor senior to the claimant. He is entitled
to get all attendant benefits since September 1978 for
the post of regular work charged Assistant Operator/
Operator. He claims that benefits for the post of Assistant
Operator from September 1978 to August 1984 may be
accorded and he may be restored to the position of
Operator from August 1984 till date, besides payment of
wages for the post of Operator thereafter.
4. Claim was demurred by the management pleading
that Shri Jaipal Saran was engaged as Assistant Operator
with effect from 01.01.1979 purely on temporary basis
by the Executive Engineer, Mechanical & Workshop
Division, New Delhi. His engagement as Assistant
Operator was due to exigencies of work of casual nature.
When regular post of Khalasi was available, offer was
given to him to join that post. He accepted that offer and
joined as regular Khalasi on 17.08.1984. He submitted
his joining report accordingly. No unfair labour practice
was adopted by the management when offer for the post
of Khalasi was made to him. It does not lie in his mouth
to claim that he was coerced to join as Khalasi. A casual
muster roll worker can only be regularized against a
sanctioned post.
5. Shri Sudama Manjhi and Shri Ram Krishan were
also offered post of Khalasi, but they opted not to accept
that offer. They continued to work as daily rated Assistant
Operator on muster roll. To regularize casual workers,
working on muster roll, Government of India, created
8982 posts in various categories of work charged
establishment and regular classified establishment. When
aforesaid posts were created, Shri Sudama Manjhi and Shri
Ram Krishan, working as Assistant Operators, were
regularized on the post of Assistant Operator. It is wrong
to claim that the claimant is entitled for getting his
services rendered as muster roll casual employee,
counted. He cannot agitate that he is to be restored to the
position of Operator, besides financial benefits for that
post. His claim, being devoid of merits, may be dismissed,
pleads the management.
6. Vide order No.Z/22019/6/2007-IR(C II), New
Delhi dated 11.02.2008, case was transferred to Central
Government Industrial Tribunal No.II, New Delhi for
adjudication by the appropriate Government.
3258
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 6, 2013/ASHADHA 15, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
7. Claimant opted not to testify facts in support of
his claim. Shri K.C. Sharma, Assistant Engineer, deposed
facts on behalf of the management.
8. Vide notification No.A-11016/3/2009-CLS II,
New Delhi dated 03.04.2013, additional charge of the post
of the Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial
Tribunal No.II, New Delhi, was assigned to the undersigned
by the appropriate Government and thus the case reached
this Tribunal for adjudication.
9. Arguments were heard at the bar. Shri B.K. Prasad,
authorized representative, advanced arguments on behalf
of the claimant. Shri Subhash Chandra, Assistant Engineer,
presented facts on behalf of the management. I have given
my careful considerations to the arguments advanced at
the bar and cautiously perused the record. My findings on
issues involved in the controversy are as follows:
10. Shri K.C. Sharma, Assistant Engineer, swears in
his affidavit Ex. MW1/A, tendered as evidence, that the
claimant was engaged as Assistant Operator on muster
roll purely on temporary basis by the Executive Engineer,
Mechanical & Workshop Division, New Delhi. When he
was working on muster roll as Assistant Operator, he was
offered appointment as Khalasi on regular basis, vide
order No.10(5)/DCEC-VII/E-3/1427 dated 16.08.1984.
He accepted the offer and joined as Khalasi on regular
basis with effect from 17.08.1984. He submitted his
joining report, which is Ex. MW1/2. A Khalasi is promoted
on the post of Assistant Operator on the basis of his
seniority and that too after passing departmental test.
11. Casual/muster roll workers can be regularized
against sanctioned post only. Regular posts were created
for regularization of casual workers, working on muster
roll/hand receipt posts, vide order No/38/2/87/ECX dated
30.09.1992 and as such eligible daily rated workers were
regularized according to their seniority. The said order is
Ex. MW1/3. Shri Sudama Manjhi was working as Assistant
Operator on daily wages. He passed departmental test for
regularization to the post of Operator. When post was
available, he was appointed to the post of Operator vide
order dated 19.03.1993, which is Ex. MW1/6.
12. Facts unfolded by Shri Sharma remained un-
assailed. Therefore, out of facts pleaded by the parties
and those testified by Shri Sharma, it emerged that the
claimant was engaged as Assistant Operator on muster
roll purely on temporary basis on 01.09.1979.
Management engages muster roll employees in terms of
following instructions:
I. The muster roll labour should be employed for
essential works or original work done departmentally and
to the barest minimum. They should not be engaged for
long period on jobs relating to repairs (Memo No. 615-
EIV/WC dated 02.06.1964)
II. Supervisory staff should not be employed on
muster roll (Memo No. 615- EIV/WC dated 19.07.1954)
III.The muster roll staff should not be employed
for more than a year. All posts against which persons are
employed for more than a year should be taken on W.C.
Estt. and suitable persons be employed on these
jobs(Memo No.615-EIV/WC dated 14.09.1954).
IV.The muster roll staff should be employed on
(RTC) jobs of purely casual nature and services of such
employees should be terminated immediately on
completion of the job on which they are employed. The
employment of muster roll labour from 3 months to six
months should be approved by the superintending Engineer
and six months to a year by the Chief Engineer/Engineer-
in-Chief. (23/3/58; EIV(A) dated 27.06.1958).
13. As projected above, a muster roll labour is to
be engaged to the barest minimum. He cannot be engaged
for a period of more than one year. In case muster roll
employee is engaged on a post for more than a year, the
said post is to be taken on work charged establishment
and suitable person is to be employed on such post.
Service of muster roll employee is to be terminated
immediately on completion of the job on which he is
employed. In case of employment of muster roll
employee is for 3-6 months, it may be approved by the
Superintending Engineer. Thus, it is evident that muster
roll employee cannot expect continuity of his service.
Sword of Damocles hangs over his head and he is always
under a fear that his services may come to an end on
completion of the job, on which he is employed.
14. Conscious of these propositions, claimant
accepted offer of appointment on the post of regular
Khalasi, when it was so made to him by the management
on 16.08.1984. He submitted his joining report on
17.08.1984. On acceptance of the post of regular Khalasi,
he no more remained a muster roll Assistant Operator.
Shri Sudama Manjhi and Shri Ram Krishan, working as
Assistant Operator on muster roll since 1981 and 1982
respectively, were also offered posts of Khalasi, which
they opted not to join. They continued working as Assistant
Operator on muster roll, on casual basis. Therefore,
claimant reached different pedestal than one on which Shri
Sudama Manjhi and Shri Ram Krishan, were placed, when
he joined services as Khalasi on 17.08.1984. He cannot
claim equality with these two muster roll casual Assistant
Operators.
15. In Surender Singh (2007 (115) FLR 1003) the
Apex Court, commanded Government of India to create
some posts in various categories in work charged
establishment and regular classified establishments for
regularization of muster roll workers, working with the
management since long. In consonance with the directions
so given, the Government of India created 8982 posts in
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tqykbZ 6] 2013@vk"kk<+ 15] 1935
3259
various categories of work charged establishment and
regular classified establishments. When these posts were
created, Shri Sudama Manjhi and Shri Ram Krishan were
senior enough to be regularized on the post of Assistant
Operator, hence the management regularized their
services as such. Arbitration award for re-categorization
and reclassification of workmen in establishment of the
management was passed in the year 1988. It was
implemented with effect from 01.01.1973 (notionally)
and financial benefits were accorded with effect from
01.04.1981. On implementation of the Arbitration award,
post of Assistant Operator was merged with the post of
Operator. As such, Shri Sudama Manjhi and Shri Ram
Krishan reached the position of Operator. It is how the
heart of the claimant started wailing. Hind sight made him
to visualize that in case he would have continued working
as Assistant Operator on muster roll, he was bound to
reach the position of Operator. He lost sight of uncertainty,
which prevailed till additional posts were created by the
Government of India. Above circumstances make it
apparent that the claimant cannot put his case at par with
Shri Sudama Manjhi and Shri Ram Krishan.
16. Admittedly post of Assistant Operator, which
merged with the post of Operator, is promotional post.
Claimant was required to pass departmental test for that
promotion, which he never attempted. On the other hand,
Shri Sudama Manjhi and Shri Ram Krishan passed that
departmental test. This proposition also makes line of
demarcation in the two situations very clear and visible.
Thus, it is evident that the claimant cannot claim equality
with Shri Sudama Manjhi and Shri Ram Krishan. He also
failed to project case for regularization of his service on
the post of Assistant Operator, since on the date of
creation of additional posts, while working as regular
Khalasi with the management. Those additional posts were
not meant for persons like the claimant, who initially
worked as muster roll employee and subsequently got
regular appointment with the management.
17. In view of the reasons detailed above, it is crystal
clear that the claimant does not have a case for counting
of his service rendered by him as Assistant Operator on
muster roll, not to talk of his regularization on the post
of Operator when additional posts of 8982 posts were
created in various categories of work charged
establishment and regular classified establishment of the
management. His claim is devoid of merits. It is announced
that the management has not acted in an illegal or
unjustified manner when services, rendered by the
claimant, as Assistant Operator on muster roll, were not
counted and he was not regularized as Assistant Operator/
Operator, on creation of posts referred above. Action of
the management is found to be justified also. Claim put
forward by the claimant is brushed aside. An award is,
accordingly, passed in favour of the management and
against the claimant. It be sent to the appropriate
Government for publication.
Dated : 25.04.2013
Dr. R. K. YADAV, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 10 twu] 2013
dk-vk- 1258-
— vkS|ksfxd fookn vfèfu;e] 1947 ¼1947
dk 14½ dh èkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh; ljdkj dfe'kuj]
,eñlhñMhñ ds izcaèra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds
chp] vuqcaè esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vfèdj.k u-&1 ubZ fnYyh ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 73@2012½ dks
izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 06&06&2013 dks izkIr
gqvk FkkA
[Qkñ lañ ,y&42011@214@2011&vkbZvkj ¼Mh ;w½]
tksgu rksiuks] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 10th June, 2013
S.O 1258.— In pursuance of Section 2A (2) of the
Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 73/
2012) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court No.1, New Delhi as shown in the Annexure,
in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation
to the management of The Commissioner, MCD, which
was received by the Central Government on 06/06/2013.
[F.No.L-42011/214/2011-IR(DU)]
JOHAN TOPNO, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE DR. R.K. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER,
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL
TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT NO. 1,
KARKARDOOMA COURT
COMPLEX, DELHI
I.D. No.73/2012
Shri Fateh Singh through
The General Secretary,
Delhi Municipal Karamchari Ekta Union (Regd.)
780, Bali Maran,
Delhi-110006.
. . .Workman
Versus
The Commissioner,
Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD)
Town Hall, Chandni Chowk,
Delhi-110006
. . .Management
3260
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 6, 2013/ASHADHA 15, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
AWARD
Municipal Corporation of Delhi (in short the
Corporation) engages sweepers on muster roll. Workers
engaged on muster roll crave for regularization of their
services. Considering the demand raised by the employees
for regularization of their services, the Corporation
framed policy for their regularization in a phased manner,
subject to availability of posts and funds. In pursuance of
policy for regularization of muster roll employees in
phased manner, the Corporation regularized services of
Shri Fateh Singh, in September 2006, who was working
as safai karamchari. Feeling aggrieved by that act of the
Corporation, Shri Fateh Singh approached the Delhi
Mazdoor Karamchari Ekta Union (in short the union) for
redressal of his grievance. The union raised demand for
regularization of service of Sh.Fateh Singh with effect
from 01.04.2000, which demand was not conceded to by
the Corporation. The union raised a dispute before the
Conciliation Officer. Since the Corporation contested the
claim, conciliation proceedings ended into a failure. On
consideration of the failure report, submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, the appropriate Government
referred the dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication, vide
order No. L-42011/214/2011-1R(DU), New Delhi dated
13.03.2012 with following terms:
"Whether action of the management of Municipal
Corporation of Delhi in regularizing the workman, Shri
Fateh Singh, S/o Shri Jai Kishan, safai karamchari, with
effect from September 2006 instead of 01.04.2000 is
legal and justified? What relief the work entitled to and
from which date?”
2. Claimant, Shri Fateh Singh, was called upon by
the Tribunal to file his claim statement. He opted not to
file claim statement. He made a statement on oath
claiming that since his services have been regularized,
dispute between him and the Corporation stood satisfied.
Thus, it emerged that Shri Fateh Singh does not want to
raise grievances before the Tribunal.
3. Corporation presented facts before this Tribunal,
detailing therein that initially services of Shri Fateh Singh
were regularized with effect from 12.09.2006 as safai
karamchari. He accepted the proposal and joined as safai
karamchari with the Corporation. Subsequently, when Shri
Fateh Singh raised the issue, his case was considered again.
On consideration of facts, service of Shri Fateh Singh
was regularized as safai karamchari with effect from
01.04.2003, vide office order No.1798/DAIII-AC/
DEMS(HQ) dated 17.06.2011. All consequential benefits
have also been released in his favour.
4. Out of facts presented by the Corporation and,
the statement made by Shri Fateh Singh, it crystallizes
that services of Shri Fateh Singh have been regularized as
safai karamchari with effect from 01.04.2003 and all
consequential benefits have been released in his favour.
Shri Fateh Singh feels satisfied from the above situation
and does not want to raise grievances against his employer.
Consequently, it is evident that dispute between Shir Fateh
Singh and the Corporation no more remains to be
adjudicated. Resultantly, an award is, accordingly, passed.
It be sent to the appropriate Government for
publication.
Dated : 03.05.2013
Dr. R. K. YADAV, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYYkh] 10 twu] 2013
dk- vk-
1259-
— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947]¼1947
dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k e—] dsUnzh; ljdkj dfe'kuj]
,eñlhñMhñ ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds
chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/kdj.k u- 2] ubZ fnYyh ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 72@2012 dks
izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 06&06&2013 dks izkIr
gqvk FkkA
[Qkñ lañ ,y &42011@215@2011&vkbZ vkj ¼Mh;w½]
tksgu rksiuks] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 10th June, 2013
S.O. 1259.— In pursuance of Section 2A (2) of
the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 70/
2012) of the Central Goverment Industrial Tribunal cum
Labour Court No. 1, New Delhi as shown in the Annexure,
in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation
to the management of The Commissioner, MCD, which
was received by the Central Government on 06-06-2013.
[F.No. L-42011/215/2011-IR(DU)]
JOHAN TOPNO, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE DR. R.K. YADAV PRESIDING OFFICER
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL
TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT NO.1,
KARKARDOOMA COURT COMPLEX, DELHI
I.D.No.72/2012
Shri Dal Chand through
The General Secretary,
Delhi Municipal Karamchari Ekta Union (Regd.)
780, Bali Maran,
Delhi-110006.
Workman
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tqykbZ 6] 2013@vk"kk<+ 15] 1935
3261
Versus
The Commissioner,
Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD)
Town Hall, Chandni Chowk,
Delhi-110006
Management
AWARD
Municipal Corporation of Delhi (in short the
Corporation) engage) sweepers on muster roll. Workers
engaged on muster roll crave for regularization of their
services. Considering the demand raised by the employees
for regularization of their services, the Corporation
framed policy for their regularization in a phased manner,
subject to availability of posts and funds. In pursuance of
policy for regularization of muster roll employees in
phased manner, the Corporation regularized services of
Shri Dal Chand, in September 2006, who was working as
safai karamchari. Feeling aggrieved by that act of the
Corporation, Shri Dal Chand approached the Delhi
Mazdoor Karamchari Ekta Union (in short the union) for
redressal of his grievance. The union raised demand for
regularization of service of Dal Chand with effect from
01.04.2000, which demand was not conceded to by the
Corporation. The union raised a dispute before the
Conciliation Officer. Since the Corporation contested the
claim, conciliation proceedings ended into a failure. On
consideration of the failure report, submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, the appropriate Government
referred the dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide
order No. L: 42011/215/2011-IR(DU), New Delhi dated
13.03.2012 with the following terms:
"Whether action of the management of Municipal
Corporation of Delhi in regularizing the workman, Shri
Dal Chand, S/o Shri Chhatar Singh, safai karamchari, with
effect from September, 2006 instead of 01.04.2000 is
legal and justified? What relief the work entitled to and
from which date?
2. Claimant, Shri Dal Chand, was called upon by the
Tribunal to file his claim statement. He opted not to file
claim statement. He made a statement on oath claiming
that since his services have been regularized, dispute
between him and the Corporation stood satisfied. Thus, it
emerged that Shri Dal Chand does not want to raise
grievances before the Tribunal.
3. Corporation presented facts before this Tribunal,
detailing therein that initially services of Shri Dal Chand
were regularized with effect from12.09.2006 as safai
karamchari. He accepted the proposal and joined as safai
karamchari with the Corporation. Subsequently, when Shri
Dal Chand raised an issue, his case was considered again.
On consideration of facts, service of Shri Dalchand was
regularized as safai karamchari with effect from
01.04.2003, vide office order No.1798/DAIII-AC/
DEMS(HQ) dated 17.06.2011. All consequential benefits
have been released in his favour.
4. Out of facts presented by the Corporation and
the statement made by Shri Dal Chand, it crystallizes that
services of Shri Dal Chand was regularized as safai
karamchari with effect from 01.04.2003 and all
consequential benefits have been released in his favour.
Shri Dal Chand feels satisfied from the above situation
and does not want to raise grievances against his employer.
Consequently, it is evident that dispute between Shir Dal
Chand and the Corporation no more remains to be
adjudicated. Resultantly, an award is, accordingly, passed.
It be sent to the appropriate Government for publication.
Dated : 03.05.2013
Dr. R. K. YADAV, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYYkh] 10 twu] 2013
dkñ-vk- 1260-
— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947] ¼1947
dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k e—] dsUnzh; ljdkj dfe'kuj]
,eñlhñMhñ ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds
chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/kdj.k u- 1] ubZ fnYyh ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 70@2012 dks
izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 06&06&2013 dks izkIr
gqvk FkkA
[Qkñlañ ,y & 42011@216@2011 & vkbZ vkj ¼Mh;w½]
tksgu rksiuks] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 10th June, 2013
S.O. 1260 In pursuance of Section 2A (2) of the
Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 70/
2012) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-
cum-Labour Court No. 1, New Delhi as shown in the
Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers
in relation to the management of The Commissioner,
MCD, which was received by the Central Government on
06/06/2013.
[F.No. L-42011/216/2011-IR(DU)]
JOHAN TOPNO, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE DR. R.K. YADAV PRESIDING OFFICER
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL
TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT NO.1,
KARKARDOOMA COURT COMPLEX, DELHI
I.D.No.70/2012
3262
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 6, 2013/ASHADHA 15, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Shri Jagan through
The General Secretary,
Delhi Municipal Karamchari Ekta Union (Regd.)
780, Bali Maran,
Delhi-110006.
. . .Workrnan
Versus
The Commissioner,
Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD)
Town Hall, Chandni Chowk,
Delhi-110006
. . .Management
AWARD
Municipal Corporation of Delhi (in short the
Corporation) engages sweepers on muster roll. Workers
engaged on muster roll crave for regularization of their
services. Considering the demand raised by the employees
for regularization of their services, the Corporation
framed policy for their regularization in a phased mananer,
subject to availability of posts and funds. In pursuance of
policy for regularization of muster roll employees in
phased manner, the Corporation regularized services of
Shri Jagan, in September 2006, who was working as safai
karamchari. Feeling aggrieved by that act of the
Corporation, Shri Jagan approached the Delhi Mazdoor
Karamchari Ekta Union (in short the union) for redressal
of his grievance. The union raised demand for
regularization of service of Jagan with effect from
01.04.2000, which demand was not conceded to by the
Corporation. The union raised a dispute before the
Conciliation Officer. Since the Corporation contested the
claim, conciliation proceedings ended into a failure. On
consideration of the failure report, submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, the appropriate Government
referred the dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide
order No.L: 42011/216/2011-IR(DU), New Delhi dated
13.03.2012 with following terms:
"Whether action of the management of Municipal
Corporation of Delhi in regularizing the
workman, Shri Jagan, S/o Shri Hukum Singh, safai
karamchari, with effect from September 2006
instead of 01.04.2000 is legal and justified?
What relief the work entitled to and from which
date?”
2. Claimant, Shri Jagan, was called upon by the
Tribunal to file his claimstatement. He opted not to file
claim statement. He made a statement on oath claiming
that since his services have been regularized, dispute
between him and the Corporation stood satisfied. Thus, it
emerged that Shri Jagan does not want to raise grievances
before the Tribunal.
3. Corporation presented facts before this Tribunal,
detailing therein that initially services of Shri Jagan were
regularized with effect from 11.09.2006 as safai
karamchari. He accepted the proposal and joined as safai
karamchari with the Corporation. Subsequently, when
Shri Jagan raised an issue, his case was considered again.
On consideration of facts, service of Shri Jagan was
regularized as safai karamchari with effect from
01.04.2003, vide office order No.1741/DA-III-AC/
DEMS(HQ) dated 17.06.2011. All consequential benefits
have been also released in his favour.
4. Out of facts presented by the Corporation and
the statement made by Shri Jagan, it crystallizes that
services of Shri Jagan have been regularized as safai
karamchari with effect from 01.04.2003 and all
consequential benefits have been released in his favour.
Shri Jagan feels satisfied from the above situation and
does not want to raise grievances against his employer.
Consequently, it is evident that dispute between
Shri Jagan and the Corporation no more remains to be
adjudicated. Resultantly, an award is, accordingly,
passed. It be sent to the appropriate Government for
publication.
Dated : 03.05.2013
Dr. R.K. YADAV, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 11 twu] 2013
dkñvkñ 1261.— vkS|ksfxd fookn vfèfu;e] 1947 ¼1947
dk 14½ dh èkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj flafMdsV c®d ds
izcaèra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqcaè esa
fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèdj.k@Je
U;k;ky;] caxyksj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k lh- vkj uañ 44@2009½
dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 5-6-2013 dks izkIr gqvk
FkkA
[Qk-lañ ,y&12012@26@2009&vkbZ vkj ¼ch&II½]
'kh'k jke] vuqHkkx vfèdkjh
New Delhi, the 11th June, 2013
S.O. 1261.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CR No.
44/2009) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/
Labour Court, Bangalore now as shown in the Annexure
in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in
relation to the management of Syndicate Bank and their
workman, which was received by the Central Government
on 5.06.2013.
[F. No. L-12012/26/2009-IR (B-II)]
SHEESH RAM, Section Officer
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tqykbZ 6] 2013@vk"kk<+ 15] 1935
3263
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIUBNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
BANGALORE
Dated : 28th May 2013
PRESENT : SHRI S. N. NAVALGUND, Presiding Officer
C R No. 44/2009
I Party
II Party
Shri Devendrappa S Madiwal, The General Manager (P),
C/o Ramling Raichurkar,
Syndicate Bank, Regional
At PO Mulegaon,
Office, Nodal I R Cell,
Solapur Tehsil,
No. 69, 9th Main, 3rd
Solapur (Maharashtra).
Block, Jayanagar,
B’lore— 011.
APPEARANCES :
1 Party
:
Shri T Narayan Swamy,
Advocate
II Party
:
Shri Ramesh Upadhyaya,
Advocate
AWARD
1. The Central Government vide order No. L-12012/
26/2009-IR (B-II) dated 18.08.2009 in exercise of the
power conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-
section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act,
1947 (14 of 1947) made this reference for adjudication
with the following schedule:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of management of Syndicate
Bank in not considering for reinstatement and re-
empaneling (Status Quo) in respect of
Shri Devendrappa S Madiwal is legal and justified?
What relief the workman concerned may be
entitled?"
2. On receipt of the reference while registering it
in C R 44/2009 when notices were issued to both sides
they enter their appearance through respective -advocates
and filed the claim statement of the I Party on 25.05.2010
and the counter statement of the II party on 06.12.2010.
3. After completion of the pleadings when the
matter was posted for evidence of the II party, the learned
advocate while examining R Shankar Swamy who worked
as Branch Manager of Shahbad Branch at the relevant time
as MW 1 closed his side. Inter alia, the I party while filing
his affidavit examined himself on oath as WW 1 and did
not produce any documentary evidence. The learned
advocate appearing for both the sides have filed their
written arguments.
4. The I Party in his claim statement claims that he
was appointed as an Attender by the II Party in the year
1983 at Shahbad Branch and that on 16.12.2003 he was
asked to encash a cheque and on the same day pursuant to
a Police Complaint filed against him he was taken to the
Police Custody and that a case was filed against him in
CC No. 99/2000 before Judicial Magistrate, I Class,
Shahbad and that he has been honourably acquitted through
judgement dated 26.08.2006 and thereafter he submitted
representation to the II party along with copy of the
judgement with a request to reinstate him but the II Party
denied as a result he approached the ALC(C), Bellary and
as the II Party took adamant stand he submitted a failure
report and consequently the Central Government made
this reference for adjudication. Inter alia, the II party in
its counter statement contend that service of I Party was
availed as Temporary Attender at Shahbad Branch and that
he who was entrusted with a cheque of Rs. 1,50,000.00
drawn on State Bank of Hyderabad, Shahbad Branch for•
encashment he returned saying that same is lost and then
on a complaint filed by the then Manager, R Shankar
Swamy, at Shahbad Police Station the said police while
registering a case recovered the said cash from the house
of the I Party and charge sheeted him for the said offence,
hence, his services as a Temporary Sub-staff is
discontinued.
5. At the outset, I may say the wording reinstatement
in the schedule is restoring the name of the I Party in the
empanelled list of the II Party and not more than that and
keeping in mind this position, I now proceed to consider
whether the claim of the I Party for re- empanelling his
name is justified or not. According to the evidence of
R Shankar Swamy, MW 1 he worked as Branch Manager
at Shahbad Branch from May 2003 to May 2007 and that
I Party was in the empanelment of that Branch as
Temporary Attender and his services used to be taken in
the absence of Permanent Attender and that on 16.12.2003
when Vijay Kumar Kulkarni Permanent Attender was on
leave services of I party was availed and was sent to State
Bank of Hyderabad, Shahbad Branch with a cheque drawn
on State Bank of Hyderabad, Shahbad Branch for Rs.
1,50,000.00 intimating him to wait for him for
encashment of cheque but around 1115 hrs. he returned
to Bank stating that he had encashed the cheque and while
coming back towards the bank somebody snatched it and
that suspecting his conduct he lodged a complaint at
Shahbad Police Station and then during investigation
Police found cash in his house and ceased and thereafter
I Party never came to the Bank. Thus it is not a case of
illegal retrenchment attracting Section 25(F)(O) of the
3264
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 6, 2013/ASHADHA 15, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ID Act and as the I Party claims that he has been acquitted
of the alleged offence registered against him at Shahbad
Police Station consequent to the loss of cheque amount
and immediately after delivery of judgement by the
competent criminal court he approached the Manager of
Shahbad Branch with a copy of the judgement with a
request to re-empanel him and same was refused. Since
the claim of the I Party that he has been acquitted in CC
No. 99/2004 on the file of JMFC, Shahbad registered
pursuant to the complaint filed by MW 1 is not seriously
challenged but MW 1 has categorically admitted in his
cross-examination that after order in C C No. 99/2004
on the file of JMFC, Shahbad on 26.08.2006 I Party did
approach him and that he refused to give him work. When
MW 1 was the Branch Manager of Shahbad Branch at the
relevant time and pursuant to the complaint filed by him
against I Party he was charge sheeted in CC No. 99/2004
on the file of JMFC, Shahbad, when his claim that he has
been honourably acquitted in the said case through
judgement dated 26.08.2006 and that immediately he
approached the MW 1 with copy of the judgement with a
request for work and he refused to give him work in the
absence of any evidence by the II Party that he/I Party did
hide the amount encashed by him at his house and reported
the same snatched while he was on his way back after
encashment there is no justification for the II Party to
refuse to restore his name in the empanelment of the
temporary sub-staff of the Shahbad Branch. Under the
circumstances, I have arrived at onclusion the action of
the management of Syndicate Bank in not considering for
reinstatement and re-empanelling (status-quo) in respect
of Sh. Devendrappa S Madiwal is not legal and justified
and that I Party is entitle for restoration of his name in
the empanelled list of II Party Shahbad Branch. In the
result, I pass the following Order:
ORDER
"The reference is allowed holding that the action of
the management of Syndicate Bank in not
considering for reinstatement and re-empanelling
(status-quo) in respect of Sh. Devendrappa S
Madiwal is not legal and justified and that he is
entitle for restoration of his name in the empanelled
list of Temporary Sub-staff of II Party Shahbad
Branch."
(Dictated to U.D.C., transcribed by him,
corrected and signed by me on 28th May 2013).
S. N. NAVALGUND, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 11 twu] 2013
dk-vk- 1262-
—vkS|ksfxd fookn vfèfu;e] 1947 ¼1947
dk 14½ dh èkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ VªsMj vkSj
f'kikfiax izkbZosV fyñ ds izcaèra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds
deZdkjksa ds chp vuqcaè esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh;
ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèdj.k@Je U;k;ky; eqEcbZ ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ
la[;k lh th vkbZ Vh&1@10 vkQ 2008½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks
dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 6-6-2013 dks izkIr gqvk Fkk
[Qk-la- ,y&31012@01@2007&vkbZ vkj ¼ch&II½]
'kh'k jke] vuqHkkx vfèdkjh
New Delhi, the 11th June, 2013
S.O. 1262.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGIT-
110 of 2008) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal/Labour Court, Mumabi now as shown in the
Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers
in relation to the management of M/s Travel and Shipping
Private Ltd., and their workman, which was received by
the Central Government on 06.06.2013.
[F. No. L-31012/01/2007-IR (B-II)]
SHEESH RAM, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 1, MUMBAI
PRESENT: JUSTICE G.S. SARRAF , Presiding Officer
Reference No.. CGIT-110 of 2008
Parties: Employers in relation to the mamagement of
M/s. Travel & Shipping Private Limited
and
Their workman Natha Sahadu Landge
APPEARANCE:-
For the Management
:
No
For the Workman
:
Mr. Gavas, Advocate
Mumbai, dated 03rd day of April, 2013.
AWARD
This is a reference made by the Central Government
in exercise of its powers under clause (d) of sub-section
(1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947. The terms of reference given in the
schedule are as follows:
"Whether there is an employer-employee
relationship between M/s Travels & Shipping Pvt. Ltd.
Mumbai and Shri Natha Sahadu Landge? If yes whether
the demand of Shri Natha Sahadu Landge to reinstate him
in service with full back wages and continuity of service
w.e.f. 30.12.1999 with all attendant benefits is legal,
proper and justified? If so, to what relief Shri Natha Sahadu
Landge is entitled to?"
2. As per the order-sheet dated 06.1.2012 the
workman Natha Sahadu Landge has expired. Thereafter
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tqykbZ 6] 2013@vk"kk<+ 15] 1935
3265
learned counsel for the workman has sought a number of
adjournments for filing application to bring legal
representatives of the deceased workman on record.
Learned counsel for the workman today submits that he
has informed the heirs of the deceased workman but
nobody has contacted him and, therefore, he is not filing
application for bringing legal representatives of the
deceased workman on record.
3. Since the workman has expired and no application
has been filed to bring his legal representative on record,
therefore, these proceedings abate.
4. Award is passed accordingly.
JUSTICE G. S. SARRAF, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 1 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1263
—tcfd dksM la[;k Mh My@5470 ds varxZr
fnYyh {ks= esa eSllZ tqfcysaV ykbZQ lkb±flt fyfeVsM ¼,rnqijkUr
izfr"Bku ds :i esa lanfHkZr½ us deZpkjh Hkfo"; fufè ,oa izdh.kZ
micaè vfèfu;e] 1952 ¼1952 dk 19½ ¼,rnqijkUr vfèfu;e ds
:i esa lanfHkZr½ dh èkjk 17 dh mi&èkjk ¼1½ ds [k.M ¼d½ ds
varxZr NwV ds fy, vkosnu fd;k gSA
2- vkSj tcfd dsUnzh; ljdkj ds fopkj esa] v'knku dh njksa
ds lacaè esa mDr izfr"Bku ds Hkfo"; fufè fu;e mDr vfèfu;e dh
èkjk 6 esa fofufnZ"V fu;eksa dh rqyuk esa deZpkfj;ksa ds fy, de
mi;qDr ugha g® vkSj deZpkjh mDr vfèfu;e vFkok deZpkjh Hkfo";
fufè ;kstuk] 1952 ¼,rnqijkar ;kstuk ds :i esa lanfHkZr½ ds varxZr
ln`'k Lo:i ds fdlh vU; izfr"Bku esa deZpkfj;ksa ds lacaè esa nh
tkus okyh vU; Hkfo"; fufè izlqfoèkvksa dk Hkh ykHk mBk jgs g®A
3- vr% dsUnzh; ljdkj] vc mDr vfèfu;e dh èkjk 17 dh
mi èkjk ¼1½ ds [k.M ¼d½ }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,
bl lacaè esa le;≤ ij fofufnZ"V 'krks± ds v/;èhu] mDr izfr"Bku
dks vxyh vfèlwpuk rd 01-05-1996 ls mDr ;kstuk ds lHkh
micaèksa ds izHkko ls NwV iznku djrh gSA
[lañ ,l&35015@14@2012&,l,l&II½]
lqHkk"k dqekj] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 1st July, 2013
S.O. 1263.—Whereas M/s Jubliant Life Sciences
Ltd. [under Code No. DL/5470 in Delhi region]
(hereinafter referred to as the establishment) has applied
for exemption under clause (a) of sub-section (1) of
Section 17 of the Employees' Provident Funds and
Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (19 of 1952)
(hereinafter referred to as the Act).—
2. And whereas in the opinion of the Central
Government, the rules of the provident fund of the said
establishment with respect to the rates of contribution
are not less favourable to employees therein than those
specified in section 6 of the said Act and the employees
are also in enjoyment of other provident fund benefits
provided under the said Act or under the Employees'
Provident Funds Scheme, 1952 (hereinafter referred to
as the Scheme) in relation to the employees in any other
establishment of similar character.
3. Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers con-
ferred by clause (a) of sub-section (1) of Section 17 of
the said Act and subject to the conditions specified in
this regard from time to time, the Central Government,
hereby, exempts the said establishment from the opera-
tion of all the provisions of the said Scheme with effect
from 01-05-1996 until further notification.
[No. S-35015/14/2012-SS-II]
SUBHASH KUMAR, Under Secy.
Printed by the Manager, Govt. of India Press, Ring Road, Maya Puri, New Delhi-10064
and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi- 110054.