jftLVªh la- Mh- ,y- (,u) 04@0007@2003µ05
REGD. NO. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05
izkf/dkj ls izdkf'kr
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
lkIrkfgd
WEEKLY
la- 31]
ubZ fnYyh, tqykbZ 28—vxLr 3] 2013] '[email protected] 6—Jko.k 12] 1935
No. 31]
NEW DELHI, JULY 28—AUGUST 3, 2013, SATURDAY/SRAVANA 6—SRAVANA 12, 1935
Hkkx esa fHkUu i`"B la[;k nh tkrh gS ftlls fd ;g i`Fkd ladyu ds :i esa j[kk tk lds
Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation
Hkkx II—[k.M 3—mi&[k.M (ii)
PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)
Hkkjr ljdkj ds ea=kky;ksa (j{kk ea=kky; dks NksM+dj) }kjk tkjh fd, x, lkafof/d vkns'k vkSj vf/lwpuk,a
Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India
(Other than the Ministry of Defence)
dk£ed] yksd f'kdk;r rFkk isa'ku ea=kky;
(dk£ed vkSj izf'k{k.k foHkkx)
ubZ fnYyh] 24 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1502-—dsaæh; ljdkj ,rn~}kjk fnYyh fo'ks"k
iqfyl LFkkiuk vf/fu;e] 1946 (1946 dk vf/fu;e la- 25)
dh /kjk 6 ds lkFk ifBr /kjk 5 dh mi&/kjk (1) }kjk iznÙk
'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, dsjy jkT; ljdkj] x`g (,e) foHkkx]
fr:ouariqje dh fnukad 22 twu] 2013 dh vf/lwpuk th-vks-
(,e-,l-) la- 158@2013@x`g }kjk izkIr lgefr ls voS/ ekuo
rLdjh ls lacaf/r iqfyl Fkkuk usMqEck'ksjh esa iathÑr ekeyk
vijk/ la[;k 1568@12 ,oa 835@2012 rFkk iqfyl eq[;ky;]
vijk/ 'kk[kk] fr:ouariqje esa iathÑr ekeyk vijk/ la[;k
726@lhvkj@vkslhMCY;w&II@bZds,e@2012 ,oa 755@lh vkj@vks lh
MCY;w&II@bZ osQ ,e@2012 esa rFkk mi;qZDr mfYyf[kr vijk/ksa ls
lacaf/r ;k muls lEc¼ vijk/ksa esa fd, x, iz;klksa] nq"izsj.kkvksa
vkSj "kM~;a=kksa rFkk mlh laO;ogkj esa fd, x, ;k mUgh rF;ksa ls
mRiUu fdlh vU; vijk/ ;k vijk/ksa dk iathdj.k@vUos"k.k djus
ds fy, fnYyh fo'ks"k iqfyl LFkkiuk ds lnL;ksa dh 'kfDRk;ksa vkSj
{ks=kkf/dkj dk foLrkj leLr dsjy jkT; ds lEcU/ esa djrh gS A
¹ la- 228@38@2013&, oh Mh&II)º
jktho tSu] voj lfpo
3196 GI/2013
(3739)
MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES
AND PENSIONS
(Department of Personnel and Training)
New Delhi, the 24th July, 2013
S.O. 1502.—In exercise of the powers conferred
by sub-section (1) of Section 5 read with section 6 of the
Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (Act No. 25
of 1946), the Central Government with the consent of the
State Government of Kerala, Home (M) Department.
Thiruvananthapuram vide Notification G.O. (Ms.)
No. 158/2013/Home, dated 22nd June, 2013, hereby extends
the powers and Jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi
Special Police Establishment to the whole of the State of
Kerala for registration/investigation of cases Crime Nos.
1568/12 and 835/2012 registered at Police Station
Nedumbassery and cases Crime Nos, 726/CR/OCW-II/
EKM/2012 and 755CR/OCW-II/EKM/2012 registered at
Police Headquarters, Crime Branch Thruvananthapuram
relating to illegal human trafficking and attempts, abetments
and conspiracy in relation to or connection with the above
mentioned offences and any other offence or offences
committed in the course of the same transaction or arising
out of the same facts.
[ No. 228/38/2013-AVD-II]
RAJIV JAIN, Under Secy.
3740
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ubZ fnYyh] 24 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1503-—dsaæh; ljdkj ,rn~}kjk fnYyh fo'ks"k
iqfyl LFkkiuk vf/fu;e] 1946 (1946 dk vf/fu;e la- 25)
dh /kjk 6 ds lkFk ifBr /kjk 5 dh mi&/kjk (1) }kjk iznÙk
'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, dsjy jkT; ljdkj] x`g (,e) foHkkx]
fr:ouariqje dh fnukad 3 ebZ] 2013 dh vf/lwpuk la- th-vks-
(,e-,l-) la- 120@2013@x`g] ,lvkjvks la- 407@2013 }kjk izkIr
lgefr ls dsjy jkT; fo|qr cksMZ] xqtjkr mQtkZ fy- ,oa mM+hlk iu
mQtkZ fuxe dks la;qDr :i ls vkoafVr cSrj.kh osLV dksy CykWd esa
fdlh Hkh vfu;ferk ls lEc¼ iz;kl] nq"izsj.kk rFkk "kM~;a=k rFkk
mlh laO;ogkj ds Øe esa fy, x, ;k mUgha rF;ksa ls mRiUu fdlh
vU; vijk/ ;k vijk/ksa dk] dsanz ;k jkT; ds fdlh vf/fu;e ds
v/hu vUos"k.k djus ds laca/ esa fnYyh fo'ks"k iqfyl LFkkiuk ds
lnL;ksa dh 'kfDr;ksa vkSj {ks=kkf/dkj dk foLrkj lEiw.kZ dsjy jkT;
esa djrh gS A
¹ la- 228@3@2013&, oh Mh&IIº
jktho tSu] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 24th July, 2013
S.O. 1503.—In exercise of the powers conferred
by sub-section (1) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the
Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (Act No. 25
of 1946), the Central Government with consent of the State
Government of Kerala, Home (M) Department.
Thiruvananthapuram, vide S.R.O. No. 407/2013,
Notification G.O. (Ms.) No. 120/2013/Home dated 3rd May,
2013, hereby extends the powers and Jurisdiction of the
members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the
whole of the State of Kerala for investigation into any
irregularities in the joint allocation of Baitarni West Coal
Block to Kerala State Electricity Board, Gujarat Power
Corporation Limited and Orissa Hydro Power Corporation
and attempts, abetments and consipiracy in relation to or
in connection with the above mentioned offences and
any other offence or offences committed in the course of
the same transaction or arising out of the same facts.
[No. 228/3/2013-AVD-II]
RAJIV JAIN, Under Secy.
ubZ fnYyh] 25 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1504-—dsaæh; ljdkj ,rn~}kjk naM izfØ;k lafgrk]
1973 (1974 dk vf/fu;e la- 2) dh /kjk 24 dh mi&/kjk (8)
}kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, ,rn~}kjk] vkjlh
5(,l)@2011&eqe- (b'kjr tgka eqBHksM+ ekeyk) esa rFkk vihyksa]
iqujh{k.kksa ;k mlls lacaf/r ;k lac¼ vU; ekeyksa esa ds-v- C;wjks
dh vksj ls xqtjkr ds ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; ds le{k mifLFkr
gksus ds fy, Jherh bafnjk t;¯lg] Hkkjr dh vij egkU;k;oknh
dks fo'ks"k vfHk;kstd fu;qfDr djrh gS A
¹la- 225@40@2013&, oh Mh&IIº
jktho tSu] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 25th July, 2013
S.O. 1504.—In exercise of the powers conferred
by sub-section (8) of Section 24 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure, 1973 (Act No. 2 of 1974), the Central
Government hereby appoints Smt. Indira Jaisingh,
Additional Solicitor General of India as Special Public
Prosecutor for appearing on behalf of CBI in RC 5(S)/
2011-Mum (Ishrat Jahan encounter case) before the
Hon’ble High Court of Gujarat and appeals, revisions or
other matter connected therewith and incidental thereto.
[ No. 225/40/2013-AVD-II]
RAJIV JAIN, Under Secy.
foÙk ea=kky;
(jktLo foHkkx)
eq[; vk;qDr lhek&'kqYd dk dk;kZy;
psUuS] 22 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1505-—Hkkjr ljdkj] foÙk ea=kky;] jktLo foHkkx]
ubZ fnYyh n~okjk fnukad 01&07&1994 dh vf/lwpuk la-
33@94&lhek&'kqYd (,u-Vh-) ds rgr v/ksgLrk{kjh dks iznÙk
vf/dkjksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, rFkk fnukad 07&03&2002 dh
vf/lwpuk la- 14 ,oa 15@2002&lh-'kq- (,u-Vh-) ds lkFk ifBr
lhek&'kqYd vf/fu;e] 1962 dh /kjk 152 ds [kaM (d) ds
v/hu] eSa] ekyk JhokLro] eq[; vk;qDr] lhek&'kqYd] lhek&'kqYd
Hkou] psUuS] ,rn~}kjk rfeyukMq jkT;] fr:oYYkqoj ftyk esa iksUusjh
rkywd esa fLFkr ^^dkVVqiYyh xzke** dks lhek&'kqYd vf/fu;e]
1962 dh /kjk 9 ds varxZr HkkaMkxkj.k LVs'ku ?kksf"kr djrh gw¡ A
¹iQk- la- 2@90@2013&eq-vk-dk- (iz'kk-)º
ekyk JhokLrok] eq[; vk;qDr
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue )
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF
CUSTOMS
Chennai, the 22nd July, 2013
S.O. 1505.—In exercise of the powers delegated
to the undersigned vide Notification No. 33/94-Customs
(NT) dated 1st July, 1994 by the Government of India,
Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, New Delhi
under clause (a) of Section 152 of the Customs Act, 1962
read with Notification Nos. 14 and 15/2002-Cus.(NT), dated
7-3-2002 as amended, I, Mala Srivastava, Chief
Commissioner of Customs, Custom House, Chennai hereby
declare ‘‘Kattupalli Village” Ponneri Taluk in Tiruvallur
District, State of Tamil Nadu, to be a warehousing station
under Section 9 of the Customs Act, 1962.
[ F. No. 2 /90/2013-CCO(Admn.)]
MALA SRIVASTAVA, Chief Commissioner
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3741
dk;kZy; eq[; vk;dj vk;qDr
t;iqj] 22 tqykbZ] 2013
la- 05@2013&14
dk-vk- 1506-—vk;dj fu;e] 1962 ds fu;e 2lh , ds
lkFk iBuh; vk;dj vf/fu;e 1961 (1961 dk 43oka) dh /kjk
10 ds [k.M (23 lh) dh mi&[k.M (vi) ds n~okjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa
dk iz;ksx djrs gq, eq[; vk;dj vk;qDr] t;iqj ,rn~}kjk fnukad
20&04&2012 ,oa vkxs ds fy;s dfFkr /kjk ds mís'; ls ¶fpYMsªu
,dsMseh lkslkbVh] vyoj¸ (LFkkbZ [kkrk la[;k&AAATC9914F)
dks Lohd`fr nsrs gSa A
2- c'krsZ fd lfefr vk;dj fu;e] 1962 ds fu;e 2 lh ,
ds lkFk iBuh; vk;dj vf/fu;e] 1961 dh /kjk 10 ds mi&[kaM
(23lh) dh mi&/kjk (vi) ds çko/kuksa ds vuq:i dk;Z djsas A
¹Øekd% eqvkvk@vvkvk@(eq-)@t;@10(23lh)(vi)@13&14@2168º
vrqys'k ¯tny] eq[; vk;dj vk;qDr
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME
TAX
Jaipur, the 22nd July, 2013
No. 05/2013-14
S.O. 1506.—In exercise of the powers conferred
by sub-clause (vi) of clause (23C) of Section 10 of the
Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961) read with rule 2CA of the
Incom-tax Rules, 1962 the Chief Commissioner of
Income-tax, Jaipur hereby approves “M/s Children
Academy Society, Alwar” for the purpose of said section
for with effect from 20-4-2012 and onwards:
Provided that the society conforms to and complies
with the provisions of sub-clause (vi) of clause (23C) of
Section 10 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 read with rule 2CA
of the Income-tax Rules, 1962.
[No. CCIT/JPR/ITO(Tech.)/10(23C)(vi)/2013-14/2168]
ATULESH JINDAL, Chief Commissioner of Income-tax
t;iqj 22 tqykbZ] 2013
la- 03@2013&14
dk-vk- 1507-—vk;dj fu;e] 1962 ds fu;e 2lh , ds
lkFk iBuh; vk;dj vf/fu;e] 1961 (1961 dk 43oka) dh /kjk
10 ds [k.M (23 lh) dh mi/kjk (vi) ds n~okjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa
dk iz;ksx djrs gq, eq[; vk;dj vk;qDr] t;iqj ,rn~}kjk
fu/kZj.k o"kZ 2012&13 ,oa vkxs ds fy, dfFkr /kjk ds mís'; ls
¶lkekftd vuqla/ku fodkl lfefr] t;iqj¸ (LFkkbZ [kkrk
la[;k&AADTS8652F) dks Lohd`fr nsrs gSa %
c'krsZ fd lfefr vk;dj fu;e] 1962 ds fu;e 2 lh , ds
lkFk iBuh; vk;dj vf/fu;e] 1961 dh /kjk 10 ds [kaM
(23lh) dh mi&/kjk (vi) ds çko/kuksa ds vuq:i dk;Z djs A
¹Øekad% eqvkvk@vvkvk@(eq-)@t;@10(23lh)(vi)@13&14@2169º
vrqys'k ¯tny] eq[; vk;dj vk;qDr
Jaipur, the 22nd July, 2013
No. 03/2013-14
S.O. 1507.—In exercise of the powers conferred
by sub-clause (vi) of clause (23C) of Section 10 of the
Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961) read with rule 2CA of the
Incom-tax Rules, 1962 the Chief Commissioner of
Income-tax, Jaipur hereby approves “Samajik Anusandhan
Vikas Samiti, Jaipur” for the purpose of said Section for
the A.Y. 2012-13 onwards :
Provided that the society conforms to and complies
with the provisions of sub-clause (vi) of clause (23C) of
Section 10 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 read with rule 2CA
of the Income-tax Rules, 1962.
[No. CCIT/JPR/ITO(Tech.)/10(23C)(vi)/2013-14/2169]
ATULESH JINDAL, Chief Commissioner of Income-tax
t;iqj] 22 tqykbZ] 2013
la- 04@2013&14
dk-vk- 1508-—vk;dj fu;e] 1962 ds fu;e 2 lh , ds
lkFk iBuh; vk;dj vf/fu;e] 1961 (1961 dk 43oka) dh /kjk
10 ds [k.M (23 lh) dh mi&/kjk (6) ds }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk
iz;ksx djrs gq, eq[; vk;dj vk;qDr] t;iqj ,rn~}kjk fu/kZj.k
o"kZ 2012&13 ,oa vkxs ds fy;s dfFkr /kjk ds mís'; ls ^^eS- lkbZu
bUVjus'kuy ,UVjizkbtst] t;iqj** (LFkkbZ [kkrk la[;k&AAHTS
4207 N) dks LohÑfr nsrs gSa A
2- c'krsZ fd lfefr vk;dj fu;e] 1962 ds fu;e 2 lh ,
ds lkFk iBuh; vk;dj vf/fu;e] 1961 dh /kjk 10 ds mi[kaM
(23lh) dh mi&/kjk (vi) ds izko/kuksa ds vuq:i dk;Z djs A
¹Øekad % eqvkvk@vvkvk@(eq-)t;@10(23lh)
(vi)@2013&14@2170º
vrqys'k ¯tny] eq[; vk;dj vk;qDr
Jaipur, the 22nd July 2013
No. 04/2013—14
S.O. 1508.—In exercise of the powers conferred
by sub-clause (vi) of clause (23C) of Section 10 of the
Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961) read with rule 2CA of the
Income-tax Rules, 1962 the Chief Commissioner of Income-
tax, Jaipur hereby approves “M/s Sine International
Enterprise, Jaipur” for the purpose of said section for the
A. Y. 2012-13 onwards :
3742
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Provided that the society conforms to and complies
with the provisions of sub-clause (vi) of clause (23C) of
Section 10 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 read with rule 2CA
of the Income-tax Rules, 1962.
[No. CCIT/JPR/ITO (Tech.)/10 (23C) (vi)/2013-14/2170]
ATULESH JINDAL, Chief Commissioner of
Income tax
(foÙkh; lsok,a foHkkx)
ubZ fnYyh] 22 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1509-—Hkkjrh; LVsV cSad (leuq"kaxh cSad) vf/
fu;e] 1959 dh /kjk 26 dh mi&/kjk (2d) ds lkFk ifBr /kjk
25 dh mi&/kjk (1) ds [k.M (xd) }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk
iz;ksx djrs gq,] dsUnzh; ljdkj] ,rn~}kjk] LVsV cSad vkWiQ ifV;kyk
ds fo'ks"k lgk;d Jh ujs'k xkSM+ (tUe frfFk % 21&04&1964)] dks
fnukad 22&07&2013 ls ;k mudh fu;qfDr dh vf/lwpuk dh
rkjh[k ls rhu o"kZ dh vof/ ds fy, vFkok LVsV cSad vkWiQ
ifV;kyk ds deZdkj deZpkjh ds :i esa muds in ij cus jgus rd
vFkok vkxkeh vkns'kksa rd] buesa ls tks Hkh igys gks] LVsV cSad
vkWiQ ifV;kyk ds funs'kd e.My esa deZdkj deZpkjh funs'kd
fu;qDr djrh gS A
¹iQk- la- 6@26@2012&chvks&Iº
fot; eYgks=kk] voj lfpo
(Department of Financial Services)
New Delhi, the 22nd July, 2013
S.O. 1509.—In pursuance of the clause (CA) of
sub-section (1) of Section 25 read with sub-section (2A)
of Section 26 of the State Bank of India (Subsidiary Banks)
Act, 1959, the Central Government hereby appoints
Shri Naresh Gaur (Date of Birth : 21-04-1964) Special
Assistant, State Bank of Patiala as Workmen Employee
Director on the Board of Directors of State Bank of Patiala
for a period of three years with effect from 22-07-2013 or
till he ceases to be a Workmen Employee of the State Bank
of Patiala, or until further orders, whichever is the earliest.
[F. No. 6/26/2012-BO-I]
VIJAY MALHOTRA, Under Secy.
ubZ fnYyh] 26 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1510-—jk"Vªh; cSad (izca/ ,oa izdh.kZ mica/ )
Ldhe] 1970@1980 ds [kaM 3 ds mi&[kaM (1) ds lkFk ifBr
cSaddkjh daiuh (miØeksa dk vtZu ,oa varj.k) vf/fu;e]
1970@1980 dh /kjk 9 dh mi&/kjk 3 ds [kaM ([k) }kjk iznÙk
'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] dsUnzh; ljdkj] ,rn~}kjk] uhps nh xbZ
lkj.kh ds dkye 2 esa fofu£n"V O;fDr;ksa dks mDr lkj.kh ds
dkye 3 esa fofu£n"V O;fDr;ksa ds LFkku ij dkye (1) esa
fofu£n"V cSadksa esa ljdkj }kjk ukfer funs'kd ds :i esa rRdky
izHkko ls vkSj vxys vkns'k gksus rd] ukfer djrh gS %&
(1)
(2)
(3)
lsUVªy cSad
MkW- ds-ih- Ñ".ku]
Jh vkyksd V.Mu
vkWiQ bafM;k
vij lfpo]
vk£Fkd dk;Z foHkkx
cSad vkWiQ bafM;k Jh vuwi o/kou]
Jh mes'k dqekj
la;qDr lfpo]
foÙkh; lsok, foHkkx
bafM;u cSad
Jherh lq/k Ñ".ku]
MkW- jtr HkkxZo
la;qDr lfpo]
O;; foHkkx
dsujk cSad
MkW- jtr HkkxZo]
Jherh lq/k Ñ".ku
la;qDr lfpo]
vk£Fkd dk;Z foHkkx
¹iQk- la- 6@3@2012&chvks&Iº
Js;k xqgk] funs'kd
New Delhi, the 26th July, 2013
S.O. 1510.—In exercise of the powers conferred by
clause (b) of sub-section (3) of Section 9 of the The
Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of
Undertakings) Act, 1970/1980, read with sub-clause (1) of
clause 3 of the Nationalised Banks (Management and
Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970/1980, the Central
Government, hereby nominate the persons specified in
column 2 of the table bwlow as Government Nominee
Director of the Banks specified in column 1 thereof, in
place of persons specified in column 3 of the said table,
with immediate effect and until further order :—
(1)
(2)
(3)
Central Bank
Dr. K. P. Krishnan,
Sh. Alok Tandon
of India
Additional Secretary,
Department of Eco-
nomic Affairs
Bank of
Sh. Anup Wadhawan, Sh. Umesh Kumar
India
Joint Secretary, Deptart-
ment of Financial
Services
Indian Bank
Smt. Sudha
Dr. Rajat Bhargava
Krishnan, Joint
Secretary Depart-
ment Expenditure
Canara Bank
Dr. Rajat Bhargava,
Smt. Sudha Krishnan
Joint Secretary,
Department of
Economic Affairs
[F. No. 6/3/2012-BO-I]
SREYA GUHA, Director
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3743
ubZ fnYyh] 26 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1511-—jk"Vªh; d`f"k vkSj xzkeh.k fodkl cSad
vfèfu;e] 1981 (1981 dk 61) dh /kjk 6 dh mi&/kjk (1) ds
[k.M (?k) }kjk çnÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk ç;ksx djrs gq,] dsUæh; ljdkj]
,rn~}kjk] Jh vjfoUn dqekj la;qDr lfpo] foÙkh; lsok,a foHkkx]
foÙk ea=kky;] ubZ fnYyh dks rRdky çHkko ls vkSj vxys vkns'kksa
rd] Jh mes'k dqekj ds LFkku ij jk"Vªh; d`f"k vkSj xzkeh.k fodkl
cSad (ukckMZ) ds funs'kd e.My esa funs'kd ukfer djrh gS A
¹iQk- la- 6@3@2012&chvks&Iº
Js;k xqgk] funs'kd
New Delhi, the 26th July, 2013
S.O. 1511.—In exercise of the powers conferred
by clause (d) of the sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the
National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development Act,
1981 (61 of 1981), the Central Government, hereby nominate
Shri Arvind Kumar, Joint Secretary, Department of Financial
Services, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi as a Director on
the Board of Directors of the National Bank for Agriculture
and Rural Development (NABARD) with immediate effect
and until further orders vice Shri Umesh Kumar.
[F. No. 6/3/2012-BO-I]
SREYA GUHA, Director
ubZ fnYyh] 30 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1512-—chek fofu;ked vkSj fodkl çkf/dj.k
vf/fu;e] 1999 (1999 dk 41) dh /kjk 4 }kjk çnÙk 'kfDr;ksa
dk ç;ksx djrs gq,] dsUæh; ljdkj] ,rn}kjk Jh vuwi o/kou]
la;qDr lfpo] fofÙk; lsok,a foHkkx] foÙk ea=kky; dks Jh vjfoUn
dqekj ds LFkku ij rRdky çHkko ls vFkok vxys vkns'k gksus rd]
chek fofu;ked vkSj fodkl çkf/dj.k (vkbZvkjMh,) ds
va'kdkfyd lnL; ds :i esa fu;qDr djrh gS A
¹iQk- la- 11@6@2003&chek&IIIº
fç;k dqekj] funs'kd
New Delhi, the 30th July, 2013
S.O. 1512.—In exercise of the powers conferred
by Section 4 of the Insurance Regulatory and Development
Act, 1999 (41 of 1999), the Central Government hereby
appoints Shri Anup Wadhawan, Joint Secretary,
Department of Financial Services, Ministry of Finance as
Part-time Member of the Insurance Regulatory and
Development Authority (IRDA)vice Shri Arvind Kumar,
Joint Secretary, DFS with immediate effect and until further
orders.
[F. No. 11/6/2003-Ins.-III]
PRIYA KUMAR, Director
ubZ fnYyh] 30 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1513-—jk"Vªh; vkokl cSasd vf/fu;e] 1987 (1987
dk 53) dh /kjk 6 dh mi&/kjk (1) ds [k.M (M-) }kjk çnÙk
'kfDr;ksa dk ç;ksx djrs gq,] dsUæh; ljdkj] ,rn~}kjk
Jh vuqjkx tSu] vkbZ,,l] la;qDr lfpo ds LFkku ij
Jh vjfoUn dqekj] vkbZ,,l] la;qDr lfpo (vkbZ-,iQ-)] foÙkh;
lsok,a foHkkx] foÙk ea=kky;] ubZ fnYyh dks rRdky çHkko ls rFkk
vxys vkns'kksa rd jk"Vªh; vkokl cSad (,u,pch) ds funs'kd
eaMy esa funs'kd ukfer djrh gS A
¹iQk- la- 24@17@2010&vkbZ,iQ&IIº
vrh'k ¯lg] funs'kd (vkbZ,iQ&IIº
New Delhi, the 30th July, 2013
S.O. 1513.—In exercise of the powers conferred by
clause (e) of sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the National
Housing Bank Act, 1987 (53 of 1987), the Central
Government hereby nominates Shri Arvind Kumar, IAS,
Joint Secretary (IF), Department of Financial Services,
Ministry of Finance, New Delhi as a Director on the Board
of Directors of National Housing Bank (NHB) with
immediate effect and until further orders vice Shri Anurag
Jain, IAS, Joint Secretary.
[F. No. 24/17/2010-IF-II]
ATEESH SINGH, Director (IF-II)
ubZ fnYyh] 30 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1514-—o"kZ 2000 esa ;Fkkla'kksf/r Hkkjrh; y?kq
m|ksx fodkl cSad vf/fu;e] 1989] dh /kjk 6(1) (x) }kjk
çnÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk ç;ksx djrs gq,] dsUæh; ljdkj] ,nr~}kjk]
Jh vuqjkx tSu ds LFkku ij Jh vjfoUn dqekj] la;qDr lfpo]
foÙkh; lsok,a foHkkx dks rRdky çHkko ls rFkk vxys vkns'kksa rd
Hkkjrh; y?kq m|ksx fodkl cSad ds funs'kd e.My esa funs'kd ds
:i esa ukfer djrh gS A
¹iQk- la- 24@05@2002&vkbZ,iQ&I ([kaM&IV)º
vrh'k ¯lg] funs'kd (vkbZ,iQ&IIº
New Delhi, the 30th July, 2013
S.O. 1514.—In exercise of the powers conferred by
Section (6) (1) (C) of the Small Industries Development
Bank of India Act, 1989 as amended in the year 2000, the
Central Government hereby nominates, Shri Arvind Kumar,
Joint Secretary, Department of Financial Services, Ministry
of Finance, New Delhi as Director on the Board of Small
Industries Development Bank of India with immediate effect
and until further orders vice Shri Anurag Jain.
[F. No. 24/05/2002-IF-I (Vol. IV)]
ATEESH SINGH, Director (IF-II)
3744
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
fons'k ea=kky;
(lhihoh izHkkx)
ubZ fnYyh] 29 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1515-—jktuf;d vkSj dkSalyh; vkWfiQlj
('kiFk vkSj iQhl) ds vf/fu;e] 1948 (1948 dk 41) dh /kjk
2 ds [kaM (d) ds vuqlj.k esa dsanz ljdkj ,rn~}kjk Jh eksfgrs'k
'kekZ] lgk;d dks 29 tqykbZ] 2013 ls Hkkjr ds dkSalykokl] nqcbZ]
lgk;d dksalqyj vfèkdkjh ds drZO;ksa dk ikyu djus ds fy,
izkf/d`r djrh gS A
¹la- Vh- 4330@1@2006º
vkj- ds- isfjufM;k] mi lfpo (dksalqyj)
MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS
(CPV Division)
New Delhi, the 29th July, 2013
S.O. 1515.— In pursuance of the clause (a) of the
Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular Officers (Oaths
and fees) Act, 1948 (41 of 1948), the Central Government
hereby authorize Shri Mohitesh Sharma, Assistant in
Consulate General of India, Dubai to perform the duties of
Assistant Consular Officer with effect from 29-7-2013.
[No. T. 4330/l/2006]
R. K. PERINDIA, Dy. Secy. (Consular)
LokLF; ,oa ifjokj dY;k.k ea=kky;
(LokLF; ,oa ifjokj dY;k.k foHkkx)
ubZ fnYyh] 23 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1516-—dsUnz ljdkj] Hkkjrh; fpfdRlk ifj"kn~ vf/fu;e] 1956 (1956 dk 102) dh /kjk 12 dh mi&/kjk (2) }kjk iznÙk
'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] Hkkjrh; fpfdRlk ifj"kn~ ls ijke'kZ djus ds ckn] mDr vf/fu;e dh f}rh; vuqlwph esa ,rn~}kjk fuEufyf[kr
la'kks/u djrh gS] uker%—
mDr vuqlwph esa ¶usiky¸ 'kh"kZd ds rgr — ¶f=kHkqou fo'ofo|ky;] usiky¸ ds le{k] 'kh"kZ ^mikf/* ds rgr ¹blds ckn tSlk fd
dkWye (2) esa lan£Hkr gSº] ^fMIyksek esa ;Fkk mfYyf[kr vgZrk dh izÑfr* ¹blds ckn tSlk fd dkWye (3) esa lan£Hkr gSº rFkk ¶laf{kfIr¸
¹blds ckn tSlk fd dkWye (4) esa lan£Hkr gSº] vafre izfof"V vkSj mlls lacaf/r izfof"V ds i'pkr~] fuEufyf[kr izfof"V;ka varLFkkfir
dh tk,zxh] uker%—
(2)
(3)
(4)
^^ ,e Mh (vkarfjd
¶MkDVj vkWiQ esfMflu
f=kHkqou fo'ofo|ky;] usiky
vk;q£oKku)**
(vkarfjd vk;q£oKku)**
¹vk;q£oKku laLFkku] egkjktxat] dkBekaMq] usiky esa
izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa f=kHkqou
fo'ofo|ky;] usiky }kjk o"kZ 1997 esa ;k blds ckn
iznku dh xbZ ;g vgZrk ekU;rkizkIr gksxhº A
lHkh ds fy, fVIi.kh %
1-
izos'k dh la[;k izfro"kZ pkj fo|k£Fk;ksa rd lhfer dj nh xbZ gS A
2-
LukrdksÙkj ikB~;Øe dks iznku dh xbZ ,slh ekU;rk dh vf/dre vof/ 5 o"kks± ds fy, gksxh ftlds mijkUr bldk uohdj.k
djkuk gksxk A
3-
mi&[kaM (4) dh vko';drk ds vuqlkj ekU;rk dk le; ij uohdj.k u djkus ds ifj.kkeLo:i lacaf/r
LukrdksÙkj ikB~;Øe esa izos'k vfuok;Z :i ls can gks tk,azxs A
¹la- oh-&11015@1@2011&,ebZ&ih&Iº
/qzo pØorhZ] voj lfpo
MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE
(Department of Health and Family Welfare)
New Delhi, the 23rd July, 2013
S.O. 1516.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of the Section 12 of the Indian Medical Council
Act, 1956 (102 of 1956), the Central Government, after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby makes the following
further amendments in the Second Schedule to the said Act, namely:—
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3745
In the said Schedule under the heading “Nepal” — against “Tribhuvan University, Nepal”, under the headings
‘Title’ [hereinafter referred to as column (2)], ‘Nature of qualifications as stated in diploma’ [hereinafter referred to as
column (3)] and “Abbreviation” [hereinafter referred to as column (4)], after the last entry and entry relating therto the
following shall be inserted, namely:—
(2)
(3)
(4)
“MD (Internal Medicine)”
“Doctor of Medicine
Tribhuvan University, Nepal
(Internal Medicine)”
[This shall be a recognized qualification when
granted by Tribhuvan University, Nepal in respect
of students being trained at Institute of Medicine,
Maharaj Gunj, Kathmandu, Nepal on or after 1997].
Note to all :
1.
The number of admissions are restricted to Four students per year.
2.
The recognition so granted to a Postgraduate Course shall be for a maximum period of 5 years, upon which it shall
have to be renewed.
3.
Failure to seek timely renewal of recognition as required in sub-clause (4) shall invariably result in
stoppage of admissions to the concerned Postgraduate Course.
[No. V.-11015/1/2011-ME-P-I]
DHRUV CHAKRAVARTY, Under Secy.
ubZ fnYyh] 23 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1517-—dsUnz ljdkj] Hkkjrh; fpfdRlk ifj"kn~ vf/fu;e] 1956 (1956 dk 102) dh /kjk 12 dh mi&/kjk (2) }kjk iznÙk
'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] Hkkjrh; fpfdRlk ifj"kn~ ls ijke'kZ djus ds ckn] mDr vf/fu;e dh f}rh; vuqlwph esa ,rn~}kjk fuEufyf[kr
la'kks/u djrh gS] uker%—
mDr vuqlwph esa ¶usiky¸ 'kh"kZd ds rgr — ¶f=kHkqou fo'ofo|ky;] usiky¸ ds le{k] 'kh"kZ ^mikf/* ds rgr ¹blds ckn tSlk fd
dkWye (2) esa lan£Hkr gSº] ^fMIyksek esa ;Fkk mfYyf[kr vgZrk dh izÑfr* [blds ckn tSlk fd dkWye (3) esa lan£Hkr gS] rFkk ¶laf{kfIr¸
¹blds ckn tSlk fd dkWye (4) esa lan£Hkr gSº] vafre izfof"V vkSj mlls lacaf/r izfof"V ds i'pkr~] fuEufyf[kr izfof"V;ka var%LFkkfir
dh tk,zxh] uker%—
(2)
(3)
(4)
^^ ,e Mh (Mhoh,y)¸
¶MkDVj vkWiQ esfMflu (Ropk foKku
f=kHkqou fo'ofo|ky;] usiky
,oa ;kSu jksx rFkk dq"B jksx foKku)**
¹vk;q£oKku laLFkku] egkjktxat] dkBekaMq] usiky esa
izf'kf{kr d, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa f=kHkqou
fo'ofo|ky;] usiky }kjk o"kZ 2007 esa ;k blds ckn
iznku dh xbZ ;g vgZrk ekU;rkizkIr gksxhº A
lHkh ds fy, fVIi.kh %
1-
izos'k dh la[;k izfro"kZ pkj fo|k£Fk;ksa rd lhfer dj nh xbZ gS A
2-
LukrdksÙkj ikB~;Øe dks iznku dh xbZ ,slh ekU;rk dh vf/dre vof/ 5 o"kks± ds fy, gksxh ftlds mijkUr bldk uohdj.k
djkuk gksxk A
3-
mi&[kaM (4) dh vko';drk ds vuqlkj ekU;rk dk le; ij uohdj.k u djkus ds ifj.kkeLo:i lacaf/r
LukrdksÙkj ikB~;Øe esa izos'k vfuok;Z :i ls can gks tk,azxs A
¹la- oh-&11015@1@2011&,ebZ&ih&Iº
/qzo pØorhZ] voj lfpo
3746
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
New Delhi, the 23rd July, 2013
S. O. 1517.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of the Section 12 of the Indian Medical Council
Act, 1956 (102 of 1956), the Central Government, after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby makes the following
further amendments in the Second Schedule to the said Act, namely:—
In the said Schedule under the heading “Nepal” — against “Tribhuvan University, Nepal”, under the headings
‘Title’ [hereinafter referred to as column (2)], ‘Nature of qualifications as stated in diploma’ [hereinafter referred to as
column (3)] and “Abbreviation” [hereinafter referred to as column (4)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto the
following shall be inserted, namely:—
(2)
(3)
(4)
“MD (DVL)”
“Doctor of Medicine (Dermatology &
Tribhuvan University, Nepal
Venereology and Leprosy)”
[This shall be recognized qualification when granted
by Tribhuvan University, Nepal in respect of students
being trained at Institute of Medicine, Maharaj Gunj,
Kathmandu, Nepal on or after 2007].
Note to all :
1.
The number of admissions are restricted to Four students per year.
2.
The recognition so granted to a Postgraduate Course shall be for a maximum period of 5 years, upon which it shall
have to be renewed.
3.
Failure to seek timely renewal of recognition as required in sub-clause (4) shall invariably result in
stoppage of admissions to the concerned Postgraduate Course.
[No. V.-11015/1/2011-ME-P-I]
DHRUV CHAKRAVARTY, Under Secy.
ubZ fnYyh] 23 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1518-—dsUnz ljdkj] Hkkjrh; fpfdRlk ifj"kn~ vf/fu;e] 1956 (1956 dk 102) dh /kjk 12 dh mi&/kjk (2) }kjk iznÙk
'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] Hkkjrh; fpfdRlk ifj"kn~ ls ijke'kZ djus ds ckn] mDr vf/fu;e dh f}rh; vuqlwph esa ,rn~}kjk fuEufyf[kr
la'kks/u djrh gS] uker%—
mDr vuqlwph esa ¶usiky¸ 'kh"kZd ds rgr — ¶f=kHkqou fo'ofo|ky;] usiky¸ ds le{k] 'kh"kZ ^mikf/* ds rgr ¹blds ckn tSlk fd
dkWye (2) esa lan£Hkr gSº] ^fMIyksek esa ;Fkk mfYyf[kr vgZrk dh izÑfr* [blds ckn tSlk fd dkWye (3) esa lan£Hkr gS] rFkk ¶laf{kfIr¸
¹blds ckn tSlk fd dkWye (4) esa lan£Hkr gSº] vafre izfof"V vkSj mlls lacaf/r izfof"V ds i'pkr~] fuEufyf[kr izfof"V;ka varLFkkfir
dh tk,zxh] uker%—
(2)
(3)
(4)
^^ ,e ,l (vfLFk foKku)¸
¶ekLVj vkWiQ ltZjh
f=kHkqou fo'ofo|ky;] usiky
(vfLFk foKku)**
¹vk;q£oKku laLFkku] egkjktxat] dkBekaMq] usiky esa
izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa f=kHkqou
fo'ofo|ky;] usiky }kjk o"kZ 2001 esa ;k blds ckn
iznku dh xbZ ;g vgZrk ekU;rkizkIr gksxhº A
lHkh ds fy, fVIi.kh %
1-
izos'k dh la[;k izfro"kZ rhu fo|k£Fk;ksa rd lhfer dj nh xbZ gS A
2-
LukrdksÙkj ikB~;Øe dks iznku dh xbZ ,slh ekU;rk dh vf/dre vof/ 5 o"kks± ds fy, gksxh ftlds mijkUr bldk uohdj.k
djkuk gksxk A
3-
mi&[kaM (4) dh vko';drk ds vuqlkj ekU;rk dk le; ij uohdj.k u djkus ds ifj.kkeLo:i lacaf/r
LukrdksÙkj ikB~;Øe esa izos'k vfuok;Z :i ls can gks tk,azxs A
¹la- oh-&11015@1@2011&,e bZ&ih&Iº
/qzo pØorhZ] voj lfpo
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3747
New Delhi, the 23rd July, 2013
S. O. 1518.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of the Section 12 of the Indian Medical Council
Act, 1956 (102 of 1956), the Central Government, after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby makes the following
further amendments in the Second Schedule to the said Act, namely:—
In the said Schedule under the heading “Nepal” — against “Tribhuvan University, Nepal”, under the headings
‘Title’ [hereinafter referred to as column (2)], ‘Nature of qualifications as stated in diploma’ {hereinafter referred to as
column (3)} and “Abbreviation” [hereinafter referred to as column (4)], after the last entry and entry relating therto the
following shall be inserted, namely:—
(2)
(3)
(4)
“MS (Orthopaedics)”
“Master of Surgery
Tribhuvan University, Nepal
(Orthopaedics)”
[This shall be recognized qualification when granted
by Tribhuvan University, Nepal in respect of students
being trained at Institute of Medicine, Maharaj Gunj,
Kathmandu, Nepal on or after 2001].
Note to all :
1.
The number of admissions are restricted to Three students per year.
2.
The recognition so granted to a Postgraduate Course shall be for a maximum period of 5 years, upon which it shall
have to be renewed.
3.
Failure to seek timely renewal of recognition as required in sub-clause (4) shall invariably result in
stoppage of admissions to the concerned Postgraduate Course.
[No. V.-11015/1/2011-ME-P-I]
DHRUV CHAKRAVARTY, Under Secy.
ubZ fnYyh] 23 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1519-—dsUnz ljdkj] Hkkjrh; fpfdRlk ifj"kn~ vf/fu;e] 1956 (1956 dk 102) dh /kjk 12 dh mi&/kjk (2) }kjk iznÙk
'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] Hkkjrh; fpfdRlk ifj"kn~ ls ijke'kZ djus ds ckn] mDr vf/fu;e dh f}rh; vuqlwph esa ,rn~}kjk fuEufyf[kr
la'kks/u djrh gS] uker%—
mDr vuqlwph esa ¶usiky¸ 'kh"kZd ds rgr — ¶ch-ih- dksbjkyk LokLF; foKku laLFkku] /ju] usiky¸ ds le{k] 'kh"kZ ^mikf/* ds rgr
¹blds ckn tSlk fd dkWye (2) esa lan£Hkr gSº] ^fMIyksek esa ;Fkk mfYyf[kr vgZrk dh izÑfr* {blds ckn tSlk fd dkWye (3) esa lan£Hkr
gS} rFkk ¶laf{kfIr¸ ¹blds ckn tSlk fd dkWye (4) esa lan£Hkr gSº] vafre izfof"V vkSj mlls lacaf/r izfof"V ds i'pkr~] fuEufyf[kr
izfof"V;ka var%LFkkfir dh tk,zxh] uker%—
(2)
(3)
(4)
^^ ,e ,l (vkschth)¸
¶ekLVj vkWiQ ltZjh
ch-ih- dksbjkyk LokLF; foKku laLFkku] /ju] usiky
(izlwfr ,oa L=kh jksx foKku)**
¹ch-ih- dksbjkyk LokLF; foKku laLFkku] /ju] usiky
esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa
ch-ih- dksbjkyk LokLF; foKku laLFkku] /ju] usiky
(le fo'ofo|ky;) }kjk o"kZ 2003 esa ;k blds ckn
iznku dh xbZ ;g vgZrk ekU;rkizkIr gksxhº
lHkh ds fy, fVIi.kh %
1-
izos'k dh la[;k izfro"kZ nks fo|k£Fk;ksa rd lhfer dj nh xbZ gS A
2-
LukrdksÙkj ikB~;Øe dks iznku dh xbZ ,slh ekU;rk dh vf/dre vof/ 5 o"kZ ds fy, gksxh ftlds mijkUr bldk uohdj.k
djkuk gksxk A
3748
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
3-
mi&[kaM (4) dh vko';drk ds vuqlkj ekU;rk dk le; ij uohdj.k u djkus ds ifj.kkeLo:i lacaf/r
LukrdksÙkj ikB~;Øe esa izos'k vfuok;Z :i ls can gks tk,azxs A
¹la- oh-&11015@1@2011&,e bZ&ih&Iº
/qzo pØorhZ] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 23rd July, 2013
S. O. 1519.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of the Section 12 of the Indian Medical Council
Act, 1956 (102 of 1956), the Central Government, after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby makes the following
further amendments in the Second Schedule to the said Act, namely:—
In the said Schedule under the heading “Nepal” — against “B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan,
Nepal”, under the headings ‘Title’ [hereinafter referred to as column (2)], ‘Nature of qualifications as stated in diploma’
{hereinafter referred to as column (3)} and “Abbreviation” [hereinafter referred to as column (4)], after the last entry and
entry relating thereto the following shall be inserted, namely:—
(2)
(3)
(4)
“MS (OBG)”
“Master of Surgery
B. P. Koirala Institute of Health
(Obstetrics & Gynecology)”
Sciences, Dharan, Nepal
[This shall be a recognized qualification when
granted by B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences,
Dharan, Nepal (Deemed University) in respect of
students being trained at B. P. Koirala Institute of
Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal on or after 2003].
Note to all :
1.
The number of admissions are restricted to Two students per year.
2.
The recognition so granted to a Postgraduate Course shall be for a maximum period of 5 years, upon which it shall
have to be renewed.
3.
Failure to seek timely renewal of recognition as required in sub-clause (4) shall invariably result in
stoppage of admissions to the concerned Postgraduate Course.
[No. V.-11015/1/2011-ME-P-I]
DHRUV CHAKRAVARTY, Under Secy.
ekuo lalk/u fodkl ea=kky;
(mPprj f'k{kk foHkkx)
(jktHkk"kk ;wfuV)
ubZ fnYyh] 24 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1520-—dsUæh; ljdkj] jktHkk"kk (la?k ds 'kkldh;
iz;kstuksa ds fy, iz;ksx) fu;e] 1976 ds fu;e 10 ds mi fu;e (4)
ds vuqlj.k esa] ekuo lalk/u fodkl ea=kky; (Ldwy f'k{kk ,oa
lk{kjrk foHkkx) ds varxZr dsanzh; fon~;ky; laxBu ds fuEufyf[kr
3 {ks=kh; dk;kZy;ksa rFkk 14 dsanzh; fon~;ky;ksa dks] ,sls dk;kZy;ksa ds
:i esa] ftlds 80 izfr'kr ls vf/d deZpkjh&o`Un us fgUnh dk
dk;Zlk/d Kku izkIr dj fy;k gS] vf/lwfpr djrh gS %
1-
dsanzh; fon~;ky; laxBu] {ks=kh; dk;kZy;] xzkaM ijsM jksM]
vkxjk Nkouh] mRrj izns'k &282001
2-
dsanzh; fon~;ky; laxBu] {ks=kh; dk;kZy;] jkWph] ukedqe
ifjlj] jkWph] >kj[kaM& 834 010
3-
dsanzh; fon~;ky; laxBu] {ks=kh; dk;kZy;] xqokgkVh] fuilhM
jksM] tokgj uxj] xqokgkVh] ftyk&dke:i] eSVªks] vklke&
781 022
4-
dsanzh; fon~;ky;] cjisVk] d`".kuxj] cjisVk Vkmu]
vklke&781 301
5-
dsanzh; fon~;ky;] dfyEiksax] ftyk&nk£tfyax] if'pe
caxky &734 301
6-
dsanzh; fon~;ky;] vyhiqjnokj taD'ku] ftyk&tyikbZxqMh]
if'pe caxky&736 123
7-
dsanzh; fon~;ky;] rqjk] ukftax cktkj] vjk;eSy] ftyk&
osLV xkjks fgYl] es?kky;& 794 001
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3749
8-
dsanzh; fon~;ky;] ok;qlsuk] ckxMksxjk] ftyk&nk£tfyax]
if'pe caxky &734 421
9-
dsanzh; fon~;ky;] ,u- ,p- ih- lh- flaxrke] if'pe
caxky &737 124
10-
dsanzh; fon~;ky; ] vkbZ- vkbZ- Vh-] xqokgkVh] ftyk&dke:i]
vklke& 781 039
11-
dsanzh; fon~;ky;] felk Nkouh] Mkd?kj&felk] ftyk&uxkao]
vklke& 782 138
12-
dsanzh; fon~;ky;] [kkuikjk] tokgjuxj] dke:i] eSVªks]
vklke& 781 022
13-
dsanzh; fon~;ky;] fnjkax] if'pe dkesax] v:.kkpy izns'k]
790 101
14-
dsanzh; fon~;ky;] ch-,l- ,iQ- cSaoqQBiqj] lkyqxkMk]
tyikbZxqMh] if'pe caxky&734 008
15-
dsanzh; fon~;ky;] usgq ifjlj] erykbZ] meflaM] eufdujksg]
f'kykax & 793 022
16-
dsanzh; fon~;ky;] xksyikjk] ts- Vh- ,l- Hkou] csyrksyk]
cynekjh] vklke &783 121
17-
dsanzh; fon~;ky;] jkEch] ,u- ,p- ih- lh- (Vh- ,y- Mh-
ih&2)] jsax] nk£tfyax] if'pe caxky&21
¹la- 11011&1@2013&jk-Hkk-,-º
vuUr dqekj flag] la;qDr lfpo
MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCE
DEVELOPMENT
(Department of Higher Education )
(O. L. Unit)
New Delhi, the 24th July, 2013
S.O. 1520.—ln pursuance of sub. rule (4) of rule 10
of the Official Languages (Use for Official Purposes of the
Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government hereby
notifies the following 3 Regional Offices and 14 Kendriya
Vidyalayas of Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan under the
Ministry of Human Resource Development, (Department
of School Education & Literacy) as offices, whose more
than 80% members of the staff have acquired working
knowledge of Hindi :
1. Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan, Regional Office,
Grand Parade, Agra cantt.,Uttar Pradesh -282 001
2. Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan, Regional Office,
Namkum Campus Ranchi, Jharkhand - 834 010
3. Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan, Regional Office,
Guwahati, NPCCD Road, Jawaharnagar Khanapara,
Guwahati, Distt. Kamrup Assam - 781022
4. Kendriya Vidyalaya, Barpeta Krishannagar, Barpeta
Town, Assam-781301
5. Kendriya Vidyalaya, Kalimpong, Distt. Darjiling,
West Bengal- 734301
6. Kendriya Vidyalaya, Alipurduar JN P.O. Jalpaiguri,
West Bengal-736 123
7. Kendriya Vidyalaya, Tura, Najing Bazar, Araymail,
West Garo Hills- Meghalaya-794001
8. Kendriya Vidyalaya, AFS, Bagdogra, Distt.
Darjiling, West Bengal-734 421
9. Kendriya Vidyalaya, NHPC, Singtam, West Bengal-
737 134
10. Kendriya Vidyalaya, IIT, Guwahati, Distt.-
Kamrup, Assam - 781 039
11. Kendriya Vidyalaya, Misa Cantt. PO Misa, Distt.
Nagaon, Assam - 782 138
12. Kendriya Vidyalaya, Khanapara Jawaharnagar,
Kamrup Metro, Assam - 781022
13. Kendriya Vidyalaya, Dirang, West Kameng,
Arunachal Pradesh - 790 101
14. Kendriya Vidyalaya, BSF, Baikunthpur, Salugara,
Jalpaiguri, West Bengal-734 008
15. Kendriya Vidyalala, Nehu Campus, Matlai,
Usmind, Mankinroh, Shillong-793 022
16. Kendriya Vidyalaya, Goalpara, JTS Building,
Beltola, Baldmari, Assam-783 121
17. Kendriya Vidyalaya, Rambi, NHPC, (TLDP-II),
Reang, Darjiling West Bengal-21
[No. 11011-1/2013-O. L. U.]
ANANT KUMAR SINGH, Jt. Secy.
foKku vkSj izkS|ksfxdh ea=kky;
(foKku vkSj izkS|ksfxdh foHkkx)
ubZ fnYyh] 23 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1521-—dsUæh; ljdkj] jktHkk"kk (la?k ds 'kkldh;
iz;kstuksa ds fy, iz;ksx) fu;e] 1976 ds fu;e 10 ds mi&fu;e
(4) ds vuqlj.k esa] foKku vkSj izkS|ksfxdh foHkkx ds Lok;Ùk 'kklh
laLFkku ^^vk?kkjdj vuqla/ku laLFkk] iq.ks** dks ftuds 80% ls
vf/d deZpkfj;ksa us fgUnh dk dk;Zlk/d Kku izkIr dj fy;k gS]
vf/lwfpr djrh gS A
¹la- bZ&11028@1@2013&jk-Hkk-º
ih- ,u- izlkn] funs'kd (iz'kk- ,oa jk- Hkk-)
3750
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
MINISTRY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
(Department of Science and Technology)
New Delhi, the 23rd July, 2013
S.O. 1521.—In pursuance of Sub-rule (4) of Rule
10 of the Official Language (Use for Official Purposes of
the Union) Rules, 1976 the Central Government hereby
notifies the Autonomous Institute "AGHARKAR
RESEARCH INSTITUTE, PUNE" of Department of Science
and Technology the 80% and more staff whereof have
acquired working knowledge of Hindi.
[No. E.-11028/1/2013 (O.L.)]
P. N. PRASAD, Director (Admn. & O. L.)
lkaf[;dh vkSj dk;ZØe dk;kZUo;u ea=kky;
ubZ fnYyh] 12 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1522-—dsUæh; ljdkj] jktHkk"kk (la?k ds 'kkldh;
iz;kstuksa ds fy, iz;ksx) fu;e] 1976 (;Fkk la'kksf/r 1987) ds
fu;e 10 ds mi&fu;e (4) ds vuqlj.k esa] lkaf[;dh vkSj
dk;ZØe dk;kZUo;u ea=kky; ds v/hu {ks=k ladk;Z izHkkx] jk"Vªh;
izfrn'kZ losZ{k.k dk;kZy; ds {ks=kh; dk;kZy;] eksgkyh dks] ftlds
80 izfr'kr deZpkfj;ksa us fgUnh dk dk;Zlk/d Kku izkIr dj fy;k
gS] Hkkjr ds jkti=k esa vf/lwfpr djrh gS A
¹la- bZ&11011@2@2006&¯gnhº
,l- ,l- c/kou] la;qDr lfpo
MINISTRY OF STATISTICS AND PROGRAMME
IMPLEMENTATION
New Delhi, the 12th July, 2013
S.O. 1522.—In pursuance of Sub-rule (4) of Rule
10 of the Official Language (Use for Official purposes of
the Union) Rules, 1976 (as amended - 1987), the Central
Government hereby notify the Regional Office, Mohali of
Field Operation Division, NSSO under the Ministry of
Statistics and Programme Implementation in the Gazette
of India where 80 percent of the staff has acquired the
working knowledge of Hindi.
[No. E -11011/2/2006 Hindi]
S. S. BADHAWAN, Jt. Secy.
ubZ fnYyh] 12 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1523-—dsUæh; ljdkj] jktHkk"kk (la?k ds 'kkldh;
iz;kstuksa ds fy, iz;ksx) fu;e] 1976 (;Fkk la'kksf/r 1987) ds
fu;e 10 ds mi&fu;e (4) ds vuqlj.k esa] lkaf[;dh vkSj
dk;ZØe dk;kZUo;u ea=kky; ds v/hu {ks=k ladk;Z izHkkx] jk"Vªh;
izfrn'kZ losZ{k.k dk;kZy; ds {ks=kh; dk;kZy;] iksVZ Cys;j dks]
ftlds 80 izfr'kr deZpkfj;ksa us fgUnh dk dk;Zlk/d Kku izkIr
dj fy;k gS] Hkkjr ds jkti=k esa vf/lwfpr djrh gS A
¹la- bZ&11011@2@2006&¯gnhº
,l- ,l- c/kou] la;qDr lfpo
New Delhi, the 12th July, 2013
S. O. 1523.—In pursuance of Sub-rule (4) of Rule
10 of the Official Language (Use for Official purposes of
the Union) Rules, 1976 (as amended - 1987), the Central
Government hereby notify the Regional Office, Port Blair
of Field Operation Division, NSSO under the Ministry of
Statistics and Programme Implementation in the Gazette
of India where 80 percent of the staff has acquired the
working knowledge of Hindi.
[No. E-11011/2/2006-Hindi]
S. S. BADHAWAN, Jt. Secy.
ubZ fnYyh] 12 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1524-—dsUæh; ljdkj] jktHkk"kk (la?k ds 'kkldh;
iz;kstuksa ds fy, iz;ksx) fu;e] 1976 (;Fkk la'kksf/r 1987) ds
fu;e 10 ds mi&fu;e (4) ds vuqlj.k esa] lkaf[;dh vkSj
dk;ZØe dk;kZUo;u ea=kky; ds v/hu {ks=k ladk;Z izHkkx] jk"Vªh;
izfrn'kZ losZ{k.k dk;kZy; ds mi&{ks=kh; dk;kZy;] gehjiqj dks]
ftlds 80 izfr'kr deZpkfj;ksa us fgUnh dk dk;Zlk/d Kku izkIr
dj fy;k gS] Hkkjr ds jkti=k esa vf/lwfpr djrh gS A
¹la- bZ&11011@2@2006&¯gnhº
,l- ,l- c/kou] la;qDr lfpo
New Delhi, the 12th July, 2013
S.O. 1524. —In pursuance of Sub-rule (4) of Rule
10 of the Official Language (Use for Official purposes of
the Union) Rules, 1976 (as amended - 1987), the Central
Government hereby notify the Sub-Regional Office,
Hamirpur of Field Operation Division, NSSO under the
Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation in
the Gazette of India where 80 percent of the staff has
acquired the working knowledge of Hindi.
[No. E-11011/2/2006-Hindi]
S. S. BADHAWAN, Jt. Secy.
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3751
miHkksDrk ekeys] [kk| vkSj lkoZtfud forj.k ea=kky;
(miHkksDrk ekeys foHkkx)
Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks
ubZ fnYyh] 23 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1525-—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks fu;e] 1987 ds fu;e 7 ds mi&fu;e (1) ds [kaM ([k) ds vuqlj.k esa
Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks ,rn~}kjk vf/lwfpr djrk gS fd uhps vuqlwph esa fn, x, ekud esas la'kks/u fd;k x;k gS A
vuqlwph
Øe la- la'kksf/r Hkkjrh; ekud dh
la'kks/u dh la[;k
la'kks/u ykxw gksus dh
la[;k vkSj o"kZ
vkSj frfFk
frfFk
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1-
vkbZ ,l 4622% 2003 fLFkj&Oghy xsV
la'kks/u la[;k 2]
31 tqykbZ] 2013
ds lajpukRed fMtkbu dh fliQkfj'ksa
tqykbZ] 2013
(rhljk iqujh{k.k)
bl la'kks/u dh izfr;k¡ Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks] ekud Hkou] 9] cgknqj 'kkg t+iQj ekxZ] ubZ fnYyh&110002] {ks=kh;
dk;kZy;ksa % ubZ fnYyh] dksydkrk] p.Mhx<+] psUubZ] eqEcbZ rFkk 'kk[kk dk;kZy;ksa % vgenkckn] caxykSj] Hkksiky] Hkqous'oj] dks;Ecrwj]
xqokgkVh] gSnjkckn] t;iqj] dkuiqj] ukxiqj] iVuk] iw.ks rFkk fr:ouUrkiqje esa fcØh gsrq miyC/ gSa A Hkkjrh; ekudksa dks
http://www.standardsbis.in ij baVjusV }kjk [kjhnk tk ldrk gS A
¹lanHkZ MCY;w vkj Mh 12@Vh&1º
ts- lh- vjksM+k] oSKkfud ^,iQ* ,oa izeq[k (ty lalk/u foHkkx)
MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION
(Department of Consumer Affairs)
(BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS)
New Delhi, the 23rd July, 2013
S.O. 1525.—In pursuance of clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987,
the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendment to the Indian Standard, particulars of which is given in the
Schedule hereto annexed have been issued :
SCHEDULE
Sl.No.
No. Title and Year of the
No. and year of the
Date from which
Indian Standards
amendment
the amendment
shall have effect
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1.
IS 4622 : 2003
Amendment No. 2
31st July, 2013
Recommendations for Structural
July 2013
Design of Fixed-Wheel Gates
(Third Revision)
3752
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Copies of this Standards are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan, 9, Bahadur
Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi- 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi, Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chennai, Mumbai and
also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati, Hyderabad, Jaipur,
Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna, Pune, Thiruvananthapuram. On line purchase of Indian standard can be purchased from BIS Sales
Portal http://www.standardsbis.in
[Ref. WRD 12 /T-1]
J. C. ARORA, Scientist ‘F’ & Head (Water Resources Deptt.)
ubZ fnYyh] 25 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1526-—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks fu;e] 1987 ds fu;e 7 ds mifu;e (1) ds [kaM ([k) ds vuqlj.k esa Hkkjrh; ekud
C;wjks ,rn~}kjk vf/lwfpr djrk gS fd ftu Hkkjrh; ekudksa ds fooj.k uhps vuqlwph esa fn, x, gSa os LFkkfir gks x, gSa %—
vuqlwph
Øe
LFkkfir Hkkjrh; ekud(dksa) dh la[;k] o"kZ
u;s Hkkjrh; ekud }kjk
LFkkfir frfFk
la[;k
vkSj 'kh"kZd
vfrØfer Hkkjrh;
ekud vFkok ekudksa]
;fn dksbZ gks] dh la[;k
vkSj o"kZ
1-
IS 15858 % 2013
—
30 twu] 2013
dkWVu lhM Mhfy¯UVx e'khujh—fon~;qr rkiu
vkSj nzo pkfyr in~ofr lfgr Mhfy¯UVx
e'khu&fof'kf"V
2-
IS 15859% 2013
—
30 twu] 2013
dkWVu lhM Mhfy¯UVx e'khujh—,vj tsV ,oa
ukW;ykWu cz'k e'khu lfgr c¯iQx e'khu&
fof'kf"V
3-
IS 15860% 2013
—
30 twu] 2013
dkWVu lhM Mhfy¯UVx e'khujh—veksfu;k
ok"id lfgr veksfu;k dkWVu lhM
U;wVªkykbtj e'khu&fof'kf"V
4-
IS 15861% 2013
—
30 twu] 2013
dkWVu lhM Mhfy¯UVx e'khujh—LØcj]
lkbDyksu] fpeuh] gqM ,oa laokrd lfgr
iznw"kd fu;a=kd iz.kkyh&fof'kf"V
5-
IS 15862% 2013
—
30 twu] 2013
dkWVu lhM Mhfy¯UVx e'khujh—,plh,y xSl
mRiknd bdkbZ—fof'kf"V
bu ekudksa dh izfr;k¡ Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks] ekud Hkou] 9] cgknqj 'kkg tiQj ekxZ] ubZ fnYyh&110002] {ks=kh; dk;kZy;ksa % ubZ
fnYyh] dksydkrk] pSUubZ] eqEcbZ p.Mhx<+ rFkk 'kk[kk dk;kZy;ksa % vgenkckn] caxykSj] Hkksiky] Hkqous'oj] dks;Ecrwj] xqokgkVh] gSnjkckn]
t;iqj] dkuiqj] ukxiqj] iVuk] iw.ks rFkk dksfp esa fcØh gsrq miyC/ gSa A
¹lanHkZ ,iQ,Mh@th&128º
dqekj vfuy] oSKkfud ^,iQ* ,oa izeq[k ([kk| ,oa Ñf"k)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3753
New Delhi, the 25th July, 2013
S.O.
1526.—In pursuance of Clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987,
the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards, particulars of which are given in the Schedule
hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each :
SCHEDULE
Sl.
No. & Year of the Indian
No. & Year of Indian
Date of
No.
Standards
Standards, if any,
Establishment
Superseded by the
New Indian Standard
1.
IS 15858: 2013
—
30 June, 2013
Cotton seed delinting machinery—
Delinting machine with electrical
heating and hydraulic system—
Specification
2.
IS 15859: 2013
—
30 June, 2013
Cotton seed delinting machinery—
Buffing machine with air jet and
nylon brush—Specification
3.
IS 15860 : 2013
—
30 June, 2013
Cotton seed delinting machinery—
Ammonia cotton Seed neutralizer machine
with ammonia vaporizer—Specification
4.
IS 15861: 2013
—
30 June, 2013
Cotton seed delinting machinery—
Pollution control system with
scrubber, cyclone, chimney, hoods
and ducting—Specification
5.
IS 15862: 2013
—
30 June, 2013
Cotton seed delinting machinery—
HCI gas generation unit-
Specification
Copy of these standards are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur
Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi-110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi, Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chennai, Mumbai and also
Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal, Bhubhneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati, Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur,
Nagpur, Patna, Pune and Kochi.
[Ref. FAD/G-128]
KUMAR ANIL, Scientist ‘F’ and Head (Food & Agri.)
ubZ fnYyh] 29 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk-
1527-—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks fu;e] 1987 ds fu;e 7 ds mifu;e (1) ds [kaM ([k) ds vuqlj.k esa Hkkjrh; ekud
C;wjks ,rn~}kjk vf/lwfpr djrk gS fd uhps vuqlwph esa fn, x, ekud(dksa) esa la'kks/u fd;k x;k@fd;s x;s gSa A
vuqlwph
Øe
la'kksf/r Hkkjrh; ekud(dksa) dh la[;k]
la'kks/u dh la[;k vkSj frfFk
LFkkfir frfFk
la[;k
o"kZ vkSj 'kh"kZd
1-
vkbZ,l 877% 1989 lfØf;r dkcZu pw£.kr
la'kks/u la[;k ua- 2
31 tqykbZ] 2013
vkSj nkusnkj ds uewus ysus vkSj ijh{k.k dh
tqykbZ 2013
i¼fr;ksa dh fof'kf"V dk elkSnk (nwljk
iqujh{k.k)
3754
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
bu Hkkjrh; ekudksa dh izfr;k¡ Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks] ekud Hkou] 9] cgknqj'kkg tiQj ekxZ] ubZ fnYyh&110 002] {ks=kh;
dk;kZy;ksa % ubZ fnYyh] dksydkrk] p.Mhx<+] pSUubZ] eqEcbZ rFkk 'kk[kk dk;kZy;ksa % vgenkckn] caxykSj] Hkksiky] Hkqous'oj] dks;Ecrwj]
xqokgkVh] gSnjkckn] t;iqj] dkuiqj] ukxiqj] iVuk] iw.ks rFkk fr:ouUrkiqje esa fcØh gsrq miyC/ gSa A Hkkjrh; ekudksa dks http://
www.standardsbis.in }kjk baVjuSV ij [kjhnk tk ldrk gS A
¹lanHkZ lh,pMh 1@vkbZ,l 877º
MkW- jktho ds- >k] oSKkfud ^,iQ* ,oa izeq[k (jlk;u)
New Delhi, the 29th July, 2013
S.O.
1527.—In pursuance of clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987
the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards, particulars of which are given
in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued :
SCHEDULE
Sl.
No. & Year of the Indian
No. and year of
Date from which the
No.
Standards
the amendment
amendment shall have
effect
1.
IS 877:1989 Activated carbons,
Amendment No. 2
31 July, 2013
powdered and granular—
July 2013
Methods of sampling and test
(second revision)
Copy of this standards is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan, 9, Bahadur Shah
Zafar Marg, New Delhi-110 002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi, Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chennai, Mumbai and also Branch
Offices : Ahmadabad, Bangalore, Bhopal, Bhubneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati, Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur,
Patna, Pune, Thiruvananthapuram. On line purchase of Indian standard can be made at :http://www.standardsbis.in.
[Ref CHD/1/IS 877]
Dr. RAJIV K. JHA, Scientist ‘F’ & Head (CHD)
ubZ fnYyh] 29 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk-
1528-—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks fu;e] 1987 ds fu;e 7 ds mi&fu;e (1) ds [kaM ([k) ds vuqlj.k esa Hkkjrh; ekud
C;wjks ,rn~}kjk vf/lwfpr djrk gS fd uhps vuqlwph esa fn, x, ekud(dksa) esa la'kks/u fd;k x;k@fd;s x;s gSa A
vuqlwph
Øe
la'kksf/r Hkkjrh; ekud (dksa) dh la[;k]
la'kks/u dh la[;k vkSj frfFk
LFkkfir frfFk
la[;k
o"kZ vkSj 'kh"kZd
1-
vkbZ,l 15489 % 2004 isUV] IykfLVd
la'kks/u la[;k ua- 1
31 tqykbZ] 2013
beY'ku&fof'kf"V
tqykbZ 2013
bu Hkkjrh; ekud dh izfr;k¡ Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks] ekud Hkou] 9] cgknqj 'kkg tiQj ekxZ] ubZ fnYyh&110 002] {ks=kh;
dk;kZy;ksa % ubZ fnYyh] dksydkrk] p.Mhx<+] psUubZ] eqEcbZ rFkk 'kk[kk dk;kZy;ksa % vgenkckn] caxykSj] Hkksiky] Hkqous'oj] dks;Ecrwj]
xqokgkVh] gSnjkckn] t;iqj] dkuiqj] iVuk] iw.ks rFkk fr:ouUrkiqje esa fcØh gsrq miyC/ gSa A Hkkjrh; ekudksa dks http://www.standardsbis.in
}kjk baVjuSV ij [kjhnk tk ldrk gS A
¹lanHkZ lh,pMh 20@vkbZ,l 15489º
Mk- jktho ds- >k] oSKkfud ^,iQ* ,oa izeq[k (jlk;u)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3755
New Delhi, the 29th July, 2013
S.O.
1528.—In pursuance of clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987
the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards, particulars of which are given
in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued :
SCHEDULE
Sl.
No. and Year of the Indian
No. and year of
Date from which the
No.
Standards
the amendment
amendment shall have
effect
1.
IS 15489 : 2004 Paint, Plastic
Amendment No. 1
31 July, 2013
Emulsion—Specification
July 2013
Copy of this Standards is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan, 9, Bahadur Shah
Zafar Marg, New Delhi-110 002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi, Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chennai, Mumbai and also Branch
Offices : Ahmadabad, Bangalore, Bhopal, Bhubhneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati, Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur,
Patna, Pune, Thiruvananthapuram. On line purchase of Indian standard can be made at : http://www.standardsbis.in.
[Ref : CHD 20/IS 15489]
Dr. RAJIV K. JHA, Scientist ‘F’ & Head (CHD)
ubZ fnYyh] 30 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1529-—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks fu;e] 1987 ds fu;e 7 ds mi&fu;e (1) ds [kaM ([k) ds vuqlj.k esa Hkkjrh; ekud
C;wjks ,rn~}kjk vf/lwfpr djrk gS fd ftu ekudksa dk fooj.k uhps vuqlwph esa fn;k x;k gaS os LFkkfir gks x;s gSa %
vuqlwph
Øe la- LFkkfir Hkkjrh; ekudksa (dh)
u;s Hkkjrh; ekud }kjk
LFkkfir frfFk
la[;k] o"kZ vkSj 'kh"kZd
vfrØfer Hkkjrh; ekud
vFkok ekudksa] ;fn dksbZ gks]
dh la[;k vkSj o"kZ
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1-
vkbZ ,l 8112 % 2013 lk/kj.k iksVZySaM lhesaV]
vkbZ ,l 8112 % 1989
31]tqykbZ 2013
43 xzsM& fof'kf"V (nwljk iqujh{k.k)
bl Hkkjrh; ekud dh izfr Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks] ekud Hkou] 9] cgknqj 'kkg t+iQj ekxZ] ubZ fnYyh&110002] {ks=kh;
dk;kZy;ksa % ubZ fnYyh] dksydkrk] p.Mhx<+] psUubZ] eqEcbZ rFkk 'kk[kk dk;kZy;ksa % vgenkckn] caxykSj] Hkksiky] Hkqous'oj] dks;Ecrwj]
xqokgkVh] gSnjkckn] t;iqj] dkuiqj] ukxiqj] iVuk] iw.ks rFkk dksfp esa fcØh gsrq miyC/ gSa A
¹lanHkZ lhbZMh@jkti=kº
lh- vkj- jktsUæk] oSKkfud ^,iQ* ,oa izeq[k (flfoy bathfu;jh)
New Delhi, the 30th July, 2013
S.O. 1529.—In pursuance of clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules,
1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards, particulars of which are given in the
Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each :
SCHEDULE
Sl. No.
No. and Year of the Indian
No. and Year of the
Date of Establishment
Standards Established
Indian Standards, if
any, Superseded by the
New Indian Standard
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1.
IS 8112 : 2013 Ordinary Portland Cement
IS 8112 : 1989
31 July 2013
43 Grade-Specification (Second Revision)
3756
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Copy of these Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan, 9, Bahadur
Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi- 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi, Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chennai, Mumbai and also
Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati, Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur,
Nagpur, Patna, Pune, Kochi.
[Ref. CED/Gazette)]
C. R. RAJENDRA, Scientist ‘F’ & Head (Civil Engg.)
ubZ fnYyh] 30 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1530-—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks fu;e] 1987 ds fu;e 7 ds mi&fu;e (1) ds [kaM ([k) ds vuqlj.k esa
Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks ,rn~}kjk vf/lwfpr djrk gS fd uhps vuqlwph esa fn;s x;s ekud (dkas) esas la'kks/u fd;k x;k@fd;s x;s gSa A
vuqlwph
Øe la- la'kksf/r Hkkjrh; ekud (dksa) dh
la'kks/u dh la[;k
LFkkfir frfFk
la[;k o"kZ vkSj 'kh"kZd
vkSj frfFk
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1-
vkbZ ,l 101 (Hkkx 6@vuqHkkx1) %1988
la'kks/u la[;k ua- 3]
31 tqykbZ] 2013
jax jksxuksa] ok£u'kksa vkSj lacaf/r mRiknksa ds
tqykbZ] 2013
uewus ysus vkSj ijh{k.k dh i¼fr;ksa Hkkx 6
LFkkf;Ro ijh{k.k vuqHkkx 1 laèkuu dh
ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa vkærk dh izfrjksf/rk
(rhljk iqujh{k.k)
bu Hkkjrh; ekudksa dh izfr;k¡ Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks] ekud Hkou] 9] cgknqj 'kkg t+iQj ekxZ] ubZ fnYyh&110002] {ks=kh;
dk;kZy;ksa % ubZ fnYyh] dksydkrk] p.Mhx<+] psUubZ] eqEcbZ rFkk 'kk[kk dk;kZy;ksa % vgenkckn] caxykSj] Hkksiky] Hkqous'oj] dks;Ecrwj]
xqokgkVh] gSnjkckn] t;iqj] dkuiqj] ukxiqj] iVuk] iw.ks rFkk fr:ouUrkiqje esa fcØh gsrq miyC/ gSa A Hkkjrh; ekudksa dks
:http://www.standardsbis.in }kjk baVjuSV ij [kjhnk tk ldrk gS A
¹lanHkZ lh,pMh 20@vkbZ,l 101 (Hkkx 6@vuqHkkx 1)º
MkW- jktho ds- >k] oSKkfud ^,iQ* ,oa izeq[k (jlk;u)
New Delhi, the 30th July, 2013
S.O. 1530.—In pursuance of clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987,
the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards, particulars of which are given
in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued :
SCHEDULE
Sl.No.
No. and year of the
No. and year of the
Date from which
Indian Standards
amendment
the amendment
shall have effect
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1.
IS 101(Part 6/Sec 1) : 1988
Amendment No. 3
31 July, 2013
Methods of sampling and test for July, 2013
paints, varnishes and related
products Part 6 Durability Tests
Section 1 Resistance to humidity
under conditions of condensation
(Third Revision)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3757
Copy of this Standards is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan, 9, Bahadur
Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi- 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi, Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chennai, Mumbai and
also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati, Hyderabad, Jaipur,
Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna, Pune, Thiruvananthapuram. On line purchase of Indian standard can be made
at :http://www.standardsbis.in
[Ref. CHD 20 /IS 101 (Part 6/Sec 1)]
Dr. RAJIV K. JHA, Scientist ‘F’ & Head (CHD)
ubZ fnYyh] 30 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1531-—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks fu;e] 1987 ds fu;e 7 ds mi&fu;e (1) ds [kaM ([k) ds vuqlj.k esa
Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks ,rn~}kjk vf/lwfpr djrk gS fd uhps vuqlwph esa fn;s x;s ekud (dkas) esas la'kks/u fd;k x;k@fd;s x;s gSa %
vuqlwph
Øe la- la'kksf/r Hkkjrh; ekud (dksa) dh
la'kks/u dh la[;k
LFkkfir frfFk
la[;k] o"kZ vkSj 'kh"kZd
vkSj frfFk
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1-
vkbZ ,l 1288 % 1982 [kfut ftIle ds
la'kks/u la[;k ua- 1]
31 tqykbZ] 2013
fy, ijh{k.k dh i¼fr;k¡
tqykbZ] 2013
(nwljk iqujh{k.k)
bu Hkkjrh; ekudksa dh izfr;k¡ Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks] ekud Hkou] 9] cgknqj 'kkg t+iQj ekxZ] ubZ fnYyh&110002] {ks=kh;
dk;kZy;ksa % ubZ fnYyh] dksydkrk] p.Mhx<+] psUubZ] eqEcbZ rFkk 'kk[kk dk;kZy;ksa % vgenkckn] caxykSj] Hkksiky] Hkqous'oj] dks;Ecrwj]
xqokgkVh] gSnjkckn] t;iqj] dkuiqj] ukxiqj] iVuk] iw.ks rFkk fr:ouUrkiqje esa fcØh gsrq miyC/ gSa A Hkkjrh; ekudksa dks
:http://www.standardsbis.in }kjk baVjuSV ij [kjhnk tk ldrk gS A
¹lanHkZ lh,pMh 1@vkbZ,l 1288º
MkW- jktho ds- >k] oSKkfud ^,iQ* ,oa izeq[k (jlk;u)
New Delhi, the 30th July, 2013
S.O. 1531.—In pursuance of clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of Rules 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987,
the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards, particulars of which are given
in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued :
SCHEDULE
Sl. No.
No. and year of the
No. and year of the
Date from which
Indian Standards
amendment
the amendment
shall have effect
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1.
IS 1288 : 1982 Methods of
Amendment No. 1
31th July, 2013
test for mineral gypsum
July, 2013
(second Revision)
Copy of this Standards is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan, 9, Bahadur
Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi- 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi, Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chennai, Mumbai and
also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati, Hyderabad, Jaipur,
Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna, Pune, Thiruvananthapuram. On line purchase of Indian standard can be made at
:http://www.standardsbis.in
[Ref. CHD 1 /IS 1288]
Dr. RAJIV K. JHA, Scientist ‘F’ & Head (CHD)
isVªksfy;e vkSj izkÑfrd xSl ea=kky;
ubZ fnYyh] 27 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk-
1532-—dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slk izrhr gksrk gS fd yksd fgr esa ;g vko';d gS fd iVuk ls eksfrgkjh vkSj csrkyiqj
rd isVªksfy;e inkFkks± ds ifjogu gsrq ftyk lkju] jkT; fcgkj esa bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkuh pkfg, A
vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slh ikbiykbu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, vko';d izrhr gksrk gS fd ml Hkwfe esa ftlds Hkhrj mDr
ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkus dk izLrko gS vkSj tks bl vf/lwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa o£.kr gS] mi;ksx dk vtZu fd;k tk, A
vr% vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbUl (Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/dkj dk vtZu) vf/fu;e] 1962 (1962
dk 50) dh /kjk 3 dh mi/kjk (1) }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] mDr Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/dkj dk vtZu djus ds vius
vk'k; dh ?kks"k.kk djrh gSA
dksbZ O;fDr] tks mDr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa fgrc¼ gS] ml rkjh[k ls ftldks] Hkkjr ds jkti=k esa ;Fkk izdkf'kr bl
vfèklwpuk dh izfr;ka lk/kj.k turk dks miyC/ djk nh tkrh gS] bDdhl fnu ds vUnj] Hkwfe ds Hkhrj ikbiykbu fcNk, tkus gsrq mi;ksx
ds vf/dkj ds vtZu ds fy,] Jh v:.k dqekj >k] fc-iz-ls- o l{ke izkf/dkjh bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM] (ikbiykbUl fMohtu)
iVuk] iks-vks- <syok] flikjk] ftyk iVuk] fiu% 800020] fcgkj dks fyf[kr :i eas vk{ksi Hkst ldsxkA
vuqlwph
ftyk % lkju
jkT; % fcgkj
ekStk@xzke
losZ@Cykd@la- (IyksV la-)
lc&Mho&la-
{ks=kiQy
gsDVs;j
vkjs
oxZ ehVj
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
jk;iqj csuxoku
313(unh)
00
32
16
Fkkuk uacj % 523
121(unh)
07
44
35
65
00
28
79
78
00
46
49
111@330
00
29
97
[kokliwj [kqnZ
248 (dPpk jkLrk)
00
01
64
Fkkuk uacj % 510
53
00
01
78
52
00
10
20
51
00
00
38
50
00
00
20
54
00
00
20
60
00
03
72
61
00
01
86
62
00
02
16
65
00
01
10
66
00
02
65
67
00
00
20
68
00
01
87
71
00
01
09
72
00
02
21
73
00
02
53
74
00
03
16
75
00
00
47
3758
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3759
42
00
01
04
76
00
00
78
77
00
00
43
41(dPpk jkLrk)
00
00
14
40
00
05
75
39
00
00
20
13
00
03
42
14
00
01
12
15
00
02
75
16
00
00
96
19
00
00
20
20
00
00
20
12
00
07
09
11
00
04
08
10
00
00
20
7
00
00
37
8
00
06
16
6
00
04
63
5
00
01
19
1
00
00
66
[kokliwj
177
00
05
03
Fkkuk uacj % 513
bLekbyiqj
183
00
01
10
Fkkuk uacj % 509
181
00
07
51
182
00
05
78
180
00
00
88
118
00
07
64
119
00
00
98
120
00
00
24
117
00
00
53
115
00
01
18
114
00
10
32
121
00
04
70
122
00
00
24
123
00
00
24
113
00
00
42
96(jkLrk)
00
03
23
50
00
00
20
49
00
07
50
48
00
03
35
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3760
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
47
00
00
24
43
00
04
03
44
00
00
24
42
00
03
08
39
00
00
37
40
00
00
20
38
00
03
83
37
00
00
58
36
00
00
24
36@219
00
00
78
38@216 (dPpk jkLrk)
00
01
13
txnh'kiqj
993
00
01
68
Fkkuk uacj % 508
939
00
01
79
940
00
00
20
941
00
00
20
832
00
00
20
938
00
04
81
937
00
02
99
936
00
03
43
835
00
05
20
836
00
07
96
837
00
00
20
845
00
04
72
846
00
00
20
844
00
00
20
851
00
01
33
850
00
02
95
849
00
00
48
858
00
02
54
859
00
00
20
857
00
01
21
864
00
02
14
865
00
01
36
863
00
00
52
872
00
01
54
871
00
01
94
870
00
01
91
693
00
01
34
874
00
01
90
875
00
01
50
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3761
876
00
00
20
691
00
01
97
692
00
01
38
639
00
00
20
878
00
02
00
634
00
04
86
633
00
00
20
635
00
03
49
636
00
00
20
307(jkLrk)
00
01
36
311
00
00
20
312
00
16
96
313
00
02
78
314
00
00
20
267
00
00
36
268
00
00
20
266
00
03
16
265
00
05
89
264
00
05
74
263
00
09
54
253
00
00
77
262
00
02
20
254
00
04
42
255
00
08
80
256
00
00
20
244
00
01
44
245
00
03
85
238
00
00
20
243
00
12
01
240
00
00
20
241
00
03
50
242
00
09
70
pd tekyh
31
00
03
04
Fkkuk uacj % 507
54
00
00
66
32
00
05
69
30
00
00
34
29
00
00
20
33
00
16
46
35
00
00
20
37
00
02
46
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3762
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
38
00
02
48
39
00
02
12
40
00
00
20
41
00
05
58
42
00
01
78
7(jkLrk)
00
02
62
14
00
00
32
15
00
00
20
13
00
08
52
12
00
00
20
9
00
01
51
11
00
00
92
10
00
05
60
4
00
10
15
dkthiwj
584
00
06
26
Fkkuk uacj % 514
585
00
05
41
586
00
17
16
720
00
00
20
583
00
00
31
587
00
04
75
580
00
00
20
579
00
02
17
578
00
00
20
597
00
00
20
598
00
14
51
577
00
00
68
576
00
00
20
599
00
04
91
600
00
05
66
601
00
09
22
602
00
03
71
605
00
00
20
607
00
00
20
567
00
00
65
606
00
11
63
565
00
06
23
562
00
04
82
561
00
00
20
529
00
02
48
528
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3763
530
00
07
50
531
00
02
57
532
00
00
20
535
00
00
20
533
00
06
64
534
00
06
44
520
00
00
40
519
00
06
97
518
00
02
87
468 (jsYkos)
00
05
87
453(jsYkos)
00
04
74
463
00
03
11
464 (jkLrk)
00
01
40
422
00
05
30
426
00
00
61
425
00
02
57
423
00
10
20
424
00
00
90
421
00
01
85
419
00
00
37
420
00
05
28
418
00
00
20
415
00
00
20
417
00
04
08
416
00
04
02
62
00
00
85
61
00
01
79
59
00
04
86
58
00
02
29
54
00
02
64
53
00
03
60
52
00
12
12
51
00
04
91
48
00
00
20
47
00
08
78
45
00
00
52
44
00
00
20
46
00
03
53
43
00
03
30
42
00
05
47
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3764
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
4
00
00
20
gluiqjk n[khyh[ky
103 (ukyk)
00
01
96
Fkkuk uacj % 517
64
00
06
66
63
00
03
65
62
00
07
55
61
00
03
52
56(ukyk)
00
02
77
1(ukyk)
00
03
07
gluiqjk
77
00
04
48
Fkkuk uacj % 516
75
00
06
71
74
00
18
55
73
00
00
46
98
00
05
72
69
00
15
13
67
00
12
17
52 (fiQYM psuy)
00
01
22
33
00
11
12
32(fiQYM psuy)
00
01
24
31
00
07
01
26
00
00
83
30
00
01
69
29
00
00
20
27
00
02
82
28
00
04
64
19
00
08
88
6
00
00
20
20
00
06
29
5
00
05
15
4
00
04
72
1
00
04
51
2
00
00
20
tykyiwj
7
00
01
97
Fkkuk uacj % 515
6
00
03
06
5
00
01
14
4
00
01
45
3
00
03
06
2
00
03
71
1
00
00
50
ehtkZiwj
39
00
01
06
Fkkuk uacj % 497
38(fiQYM psuy)
00
02
39
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3765
244
00
00
52
32
00
12
50
31
00
06
44
30
00
05
30
29
00
00
20
28
00
05
50
26 (jkLrk)
00
05
27
12
00
02
38
13
00
08
88
14
00
00
20
21
00
02
93
20
00
13
09
1(dsuky)
00
02
81
/jeiqjk
516
00
03
00
Fkkuk uacj % 305
442
00
04
18
443
00
00
20
450
00
00
20
453
00
15
44
454
00
00
73
457
00
00
20
452
00
17
08
458
00
05
06
459
00
00
20
439
00
07
82
438(dsuky)
00
01
72
289(dsuky)
00
04
66
243
00
00
77
242
00
00
20
288
00
01
99
287
00
03
06
286
00
02
83
285
00
03
48
284
00
03
08
283
00
02
44
282
00
03
19
281
00
02
56
280
00
01
61
279
00
12
77
278
00
00
64
277
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3766
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
thydkckn
1436
00
01
39
Fkkuk uacj % 495
1435
00
10
04
1432
00
03
87
1432@1535
00
01
16
1431
00
04
16
1431@1534
00
01
26
1428
00
19
49
1427
00
05
71
1426
00
02
50
1423
00
05
42
1422
00
01
74
1421
00
01
28
1418
00
02
23
1419
00
00
32
1414
00
00
20
1417
00
06
58
1415
00
04
07
1416
00
00
20
1393
00
09
35
1400
00
03
91
1401
00
00
20
1399
00
00
20
1383
00
04
05
1382
00
00
93
1403
00
05
28
1382@1537
00
09
95
1404
00
04
89
1380
00
00
20
1370
00
00
20
1371(fiQYM psuy)
00
00
52
1372
00
00
54
1331
00
19
46
1332
00
02
98
1332@1538
00
02
84
1333
00
02
18
1333@1539
00
01
60
1342
00
01
15
1329 (fiQYM psuy)
00
01
84
1328
00
00
20
1327@1536
00
00
70
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3767
1327
00
06
89
1321
00
04
60
1320
00
02
65
1322
00
01
54
1326
00
00
20
1322
00
05
10
1319
00
01
14
1316(fiQYM psuy)
00
01
89
ihjkjh
1371(fiQYM psuy)
00
01
68
Fkkuk uacj % 306
1427
00
27
00
1426
00
06
13
1428
00
29
29
1424
00
00
20
1429
00
00
20
1398
00
36
43
769
00
02
14
761
00
02
15
762
00
01
54
763
00
01
98
767
00
01
70
768
00
00
20
1430 (dPpk jkLrk)
00
01
27
njh;ko xat Fkkuk uacj % 303
2(ukyk)
00
00
20
egkjkt xat
44(fiQYM psuy)
00
01
80
Fkkuk uacj % 308
43
00
02
97
42
00
04
33
41
00
04
25
40
00
02
64
39
00
02
03
38
00
02
67
37
00
03
98
35
00
03
86
34
00
04
21
32
00
05
01
31
00
00
86
30
00
10
13
23
00
02
07
29
00
00
20
22
00
03
48
21
00
06
26
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3768
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
20
00
03
00
18
00
02
41
14
00
02
49
13
00
03
61
12
00
03
52
11
00
11
17
10
00
01
79
4
00
04
63
2
00
01
21
1(jkLrk)
00
02
57
chlwuiqjk
2350(jkLrk)
00
03
04
Fkkuk uacj % 314
2348
00
05
60
2346
00
00
20
2347
00
06
35
2340
00
03
54
2339
00
03
14
2338
00
03
65
2311
00
03
02
2315
00
03
44
2318
00
02
80
2294
00
02
98
2293
00
03
32
2290
00
06
41
2291
00
00
20
2286
00
05
17
2285
00
03
17
2228(fiQYM psuy)
00
02
96
2227
00
16
26
2229
00
04
31
2230
00
02
09
2226
00
01
63
2231
00
04
19
2225
00
10
44
2224
00
00
85
2223(fiQYM psuy)
00
01
43
2134
00
06
13
2129
00
08
70
2026
00
05
41
2027
00
02
21
2028
00
03
10
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3769
2025
00
00
20
2031
00
04
52
2032
00
00
20
2039
00
04
80
2040
00
03
92
2042
00
04
74
2048
00
03
68
2022(fiQYM psuy)
00
01
43
1911
00
04
33
1912
00
04
10
1913
00
03
05
1914
00
02
22
1915
00
04
50
1918
00
02
66
1919
00
00
48
1939
00
00
20
1990(fiQYM psuy)
00
01
04
1950
00
02
52
1995
00
03
37
1994
00
00
20
1987
00
11
30
1988
00
00
20
1986
00
06
68
1985
00
06
61
1983
00
00
20
1958(fiQYM psuy)
00
00
83
1952
00
03
70
1951
00
00
91
1953
00
07
22
1954
00
00
20
1956
00
05
72
1955
00
05
27
1860(jkLrk)
00
01
08
1856(jkLrk)
00
01
03
1811
00
07
26
1810
00
05
10
1808
00
00
20
1809
00
04
91
1804
00
04
30
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3770
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1805
00
00
60
1802
00
03
02
1800
00
00
20
1799
00
02
96
1730 (fiQYM psuy)
00
03
44
1727
00
03
76
1726
00
04
40
1725
00
02
72
1719
00
00
20
1720
00
06
46
1717
00
05
72
1712
00
02
87
1711
00
03
19
1710
00
00
20
1707
00
03
35
1706
00
02
03
1705
00
02
16
1700
00
00
71
1702
00
02
70
1684
00
00
20
1683
00
00
20
1701
00
01
40
1685
00
03
54
1686
00
02
53
1688
00
01
64
1689
00
00
20
1687
00
02
90
1691
00
01
63
1692
00
03
32
1693
00
00
34
1493
00
02
16
1694
00
00
20
1281
00
05
64
1284
00
06
10
1280
00
00
20
1277
00
00
74
1278
00
05
57
1276
00
06
16
1275
00
05
02
1274
00
02
08
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3771
1272
00
00
95
1271
00
00
20
1270
00
00
20
1237
00
00
20
1238
00
00
20
1273
00
02
50
1236
00
04
08
1239
00
01
00
1240
00
04
30
1241
00
04
42
1200
00
00
20
1242
00
02
84
1199
00
00
72
1198
00
04
63
1169 (fiQYM psuy)
00
01
86
1120
00
09
14
1121
00
00
20
1118
00
00
20
1123
00
00
20
1119
00
02
96
1122
00
06
05
1125
00
03
25
1131
00
00
20
1130
00
00
20
1126
00
02
63
1127
00
05
56
1128
00
06
78
1129
00
00
84
1054 (jkLrk)
00
01
84
706 (jkLrk)
00
01
30
1008
00
00
29
1009
00
08
96
1010
00
00
20
1011
00
09
49
1012
00
03
29
1013
00
02
89
1014
00
01
72
1015
00
01
55
1018
00
02
64
1019
00
08
87
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3772
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
935(dsuky)
00
01
07
833
00
14
29
834
00
00
80
837
00
09
43
836
00
00
20
838 (fiQYM psuy)
00
01
06
845
00
00
20
846
00
18
40
848
00
00
20
847
00
02
09
886 (fiQYM psuy)
00
01
68
112
00
10
06
113
00
07
12
111
00
01
30
114
00
02
76
115
00
00
23
116
00
14
96
109
00
00
20
117
00
04
02
108
00
08
69
90
00
03
78
91
00
00
20
89
00
03
24
73
00
03
07
80
00
00
24
79
00
02
20
74
00
00
74
77
00
00
20
76
00
00
20
78
00
05
98
eksckjdiqj
884
00
09
41
Fkkuk uacj % 317
886
00
00
20
887
00
00
20
880
00
03
16
883
00
16
88
876
00
09
29
875 (jkLrk)
00
01
82
874 (jkLrk)
00
01
12
873
00
06
55
835
00
05
24
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3773
836
00
05
03
838
00
06
38
837
00
00
20
839
00
02
22
840
00
07
68
841
00
01
27
843
00
00
29
842
00
13
69
818 (fiQYM psuy)
00
01
38
737
00
17
15
733
00
17
22
732 (fiQYM psuy)
00
01
44
730
00
05
15
714
00
07
39
715
00
07
31
713
00
08
57
716
00
00
20
709
00
02
66
708
00
00
89
710
00
03
16
711
00
01
52
712
00
00
20
695
00
10
03
694
00
05
53
682
00
09
85
681
00
06
13
680
00
00
20
683
00
00
68
678
00
00
20
679
00
08
15
697 (jkLrk)
00
01
79
ekyk 'ksjiqj
664 (jkLrk)
00
01
44
Fkkuk uacj % 315
90
00
05
96
89 (fiQYM psuy)
00
02
71
91
00
00
55
88
00
02
24
77
00
10
13
74
00
00
20
78
00
09
08
79
00
01
19
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3774
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
80
00
00
20
72
00
11
72
71 (fiQYM psuy)
00
01
60
70
00
02
68
69
00
00
54
68
00
00
92
67
00
01
90
64
00
06
66
63
00
03
79
59
00
02
27
50
00
02
89
58
00
00
90
52
00
16
40
53
00
00
20
51
00
03
30
153 (fiQYM psuy)
00
01
37
ekyk ehtkZ rqdjk
151 (fiQYM psuy)
00
01
20
Fkkuk uacj % 291
15
00
14
76
13
00
21
82
12 (jkLrk)
00
00
92
11 (jkLrk)
00
00
84
10 (jkLrk)
00
01
00
6
00
02
80
5
00
03
80
7
00
07
88
4
00
06
61
3
00
08
03
egenk
4288
00
05
31
Fkkuk uacj % 334
4287
00
00
31
4289
00
00
71
4286
00
11
42
4285
00
03
08
4296 (ukyk)
00
01
01
4772
00
06
87
4283
00
22
97
4282 (jkLrk)
00
01
96
4281 (jkLrk)
00
04
59
4280 (dsuky)
00
00
91
4279
00
24
86
4209 (jkLrk)
00
02
94
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3775
4207
00
00
38
4206
00
00
20
4201
00
10
10
4202
00
03
04
4198
00
04
64
4203
00
07
36
4204
00
01
08
esgh;u
286
00
01
47
Fkkuk uacj % 290
285
00
06
77
288
00
00
20
284
00
00
30
289
00
06
97
342
00
00
37
297
00
08
59
296
00
00
20
340
00
00
42
339
00
00
77
338
00
01
56
298
00
10
30
323
00
06
88
1360
00
00
20
299
00
00
49
300
00
00
33
322
00
08
29
301
00
00
32
302
00
00
89
312
00
03
85
303
00
02
36
304
00
02
78
305
00
08
76
310
00
02
87
309
00
04
40
417(dsuky)
00
02
72
419
00
18
35
420
00
01
16
421
00
06
77
425
00
00
20
424
00
00
20
423
00
12
72
428
00
12
16
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3776
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
430
00
06
69
429
00
00
20
195(jkLrk)
00
02
27
658
00
02
88
657
00
03
65
656
00
00
20
660
00
02
93
661
00
03
52
659
00
02
06
105
00
01
65
662
00
03
16
104
00
03
86
663
00
04
34
103
00
08
48
664
00
00
38
102
00
09
52
49
00
04
60
48
00
04
40
44
00
21
22
665
00
00
20
45
00
00
76
41
00
08
30
42
00
03
96
37
00
00
20
43
00
04
41
1(dPpk jkLrk)
00
01
28
eouk
832 (fiQYM psuy)
00
01
37
Fkkuk uacj % 286
831
00
08
45
830
00
04
00
829
00
06
35
835
00
05
03
836
00
01
58
828
00
01
04
827
00
06
29
825
00
01
72
824
00
01
86
823
00
04
00
821
00
03
54
817
00
06
52
816
00
03
16
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3777
815
00
03
44
812
00
07
55
813
00
00
95
811
00
21
65
808
00
03
46
807
00
00
20
713(fiQYM psuy)
00
06
55
716
00
01
55
719
00
17
09
720
00
02
09
407
00
04
92
408
00
04
40
409
00
04
01
410
00
02
47
411
00
03
30
412
00
05
02
413
00
14
02
401
00
05
25
414
00
02
96
399
00
14
36
387(fiQYM psuy)
00
01
62
398
00
00
20
365
00
06
59
364
00
06
22
363
00
06
19
362
00
03
08
361
00
04
40
360
00
08
20
355(fiQYM psuy)
00
01
60
357
00
12
26
356
00
11
23
342
00
05
77
343
00
03
61
349
00
00
67
348
00
05
74
344
00
00
40
347@2035
00
09
17
346
00
00
76
347
00
00
48
2(jsYkos)
00
14
71
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3778
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
3
00
05
41
4
00
05
17
1272(dPpk jkLrk)
00
01
12
la/ku
1108(dPpk jkLrk)
00
00
88
Fkkuk uacj % 342
1083
00
00
20
1083
00
33
08
1084
00
00
20
1082
00
21
24
1072(dPpk jkLrk)
00
00
89
1071
00
00
20
¹iQk- la- vkj&25011@20@2013&vksvkj&Iº
iou oqQekj] voj lfpo
MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS
New Delhi, 27th July, 2013
S.O. 1532.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that a
pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited in Dist. Saran in the State of Bihar for ‘Patna to Motihari and
Baitalpur Pipeline’ for the transportation of Petroleum Product;
And, whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary
to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which is described in the
Schedule annexed to this notification;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals
Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention
to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on
which the copies of the notification issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of
India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the
pipeline under the land, to Shri Arun Kumar Jha B.A.S. & Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited. (Pipelines
Division) P.O. Dhelwan, Sipara, Dist. Patna (Bihar.) Pin – 800020.
SCHEDULE
Dist.: Saran
State : Bihar
Mouja / Village
Survey/BlockNo.
Sub-Div-No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
RAIPUR BENGAWAN
313(River)
00
32
16
Thana Number : 523
121(River)
07
44
35
65
00
28
79
78
00
46
49
111/330
00
29
97
KHAWASPUR
248-(Cart Track)
00
01
64
KHURD
53
00
01
78
Thana No:-510
52
00
10
20
51
00
00
38
50
00
00
20
54
00
00
20
60
00
03
72
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3779
61
00
01
86
62
00
02
16
65
00
01
10
66
00
02
65
67
00
00
20
68
00
01
87
71
00
01
09
72
00
02
21
73
00
02
53
74
00
03
16
75
00
00
47
42
00
01
04
76
00
00
78
77
00
00
43
41(Cart Track)
00
00
14
40
00
05
75
39
00
00
20
13
00
03
42
14
00
01
12
15
00
02
75
16
00
00
96
19
00
00
20
20
00
00
20
12
00
07
09
11
00
04
08
10
00
00
20
7
00
00
37
8
00
06
16
6
00
04
63
5
00
01
19
1
00
00
66
KHAWASPUR Thana No.513
177
00
05
03
ISMAILPUR
183
00
01
10
Thana Number :- 509
181
00
07
51
182
00
05
78
180
00
00
88
118
00
07
64
119
00
00
98
120
00
00
24
117
00
00
53
115
00
01
18
114
00
10
32
121
00
04
70
122
00
00
24
123
00
00
24
113
00
00
42
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3780
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
96(Road)
00
03
23
50
00
00
20
49
00
07
50
48
00
03
35
47
00
00
24
43
00
04
03
44
00
00
24
42
00
03
08
39
00
00
37
40
00
00
20
38
00
03
83
37
00
00
58
36
00
00
24
36/219
00
00
78
38/216 (Cart Track)
00
01
13
JAGDISHPUR
993
00
01
68
Thana Number :- 508
939
00
01
79
940
00
00
20
941
00
00
20
832
00
00
20
938
00
04
81
937
00
02
99
936
00
03
43
835
00
05
20
836
00
07
96
837
00
00
20
845
00
04
72
846
00
00
20
844
00
00
20
851
00
01
33
850
00
02
95
849
00
00
48
858
00
02
54
859
00
00
20
857
00
01
21
864
00
02
14
865
00
01
36
863
00
00
52
872
00
01
54
871
00
01
94
870
00
01
91
693
00
01
34
874
00
01
90
875
00
01
50
876
00
00
20
691
00
01
97
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3781
692
00
01
38
639
00
00
20
878
00
02
00
634
00
04
86
633
00
00
20
635
00
03
49
636
00
00
20
307(Road)
00
01
36
311
00
00
20
312
00
16
96
313
00
02
78
314
00
00
20
267
00
00
36
268
00
00
20
266
00
03
16
265
00
05
89
264
00
05
74
263
00
09
54
253
00
00
77
262
00
02
20
254
00
04
42
255
00
08
80
256
00
00
20
244
00
01
44
245
00
03
85
238
00
00
20
243
00
12
01
240
00
00
20
241
00
03
50
242
00
09
70
CHAK JAMALI
31
00
03
04
Thana Number :-507
54
00
00
66
32
00
05
69
30
00
00
34
29
00
00
20
33
00
16
46
35
00
00
20
37
00
02
46
38
00
02
48
39
00
02
12
40
00
00
20
41
00
05
58
42
00
01
78
7(Road)
00
02
62
14
00
00
32
15
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3782
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
13
00
08
52
12
00
00
20
9
00
01
51
11
00
00
92
10
00
05
60
4
00
10
15
QAZIPUR
584
00
06
26
Thana Number :- 514
585
00
05
41
586
00
17
16
720
00
00
20
583
00
00
31
587
00
04
75
580
00
00
20
579
00
02
17
578
00
00
20
597
00
00
20
598
00
14
51
577
00
00
68
576
00
00
20
599
00
04
91
600
00
05
66
601
00
09
22
602
00
03
71
605
00
00
20
607
00
00
20
567
00
00
65
606
00
11
63
565
00
06
23
562
00
04
82
561
00
00
20
529
00
02
48
528
00
00
20
530
00
07
50
531
00
02
57
532
00
00
20
535
00
00
20
533
00
06
64
534
00
06
44
520
00
00
40
519
00
06
97
518
00
02
87
468(RAILWAY)
00
05
87
453(RAILWAY)
00
04
74
463
00
03
11
464(Road)
00
01
40
422
00
05
30
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3783
426
00
00
61
425
00
02
57
423
00
10
20
424
00
00
90
421
00
01
85
419
00
00
37
420
00
05
28
418
00
00
20
415
00
00
20
417
00
04
08
416
00
04
02
62
00
00
85
61
00
01
79
59
00
04
86
58
00
02
29
54
00
02
64
53
00
03
60
52
00
12
12
51
00
04
91
48
00
00
20
47
00
08
78
45
00
00
52
44
00
00
20
46
00
03
53
43
00
03
30
42
00
05
47
4
00
00
20
HASANPURA DAKHILIKHAL
103(Nala)
00
01
96
Thana Number - 517
64
00
06
66
63
00
03
65
62
00
07
55
61
00
03
52
56(Nala)
00
02
77
1(Nala)
00
03
07
HASANPURA
77
00
04
48
Thana Number :- 516
75
00
06
71
74
00
18
55
73
00
00
46
98
00
05
72
69
00
15
13
67
00
12
17
52(FIELD CHENNAL)
00
01
22
33
00
11
12
32(FIELD CHENNAL)
00
01
24
31
00
07
01
26
00
00
83
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3784
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
30
00
01
69
29
00
00
20
27
00
02
82
28
00
04
64
19
00
08
88
6
00
00
20
20
00
06
29
5
00
05
15
4
00
04
72
1
00
04
51
2
00
00
20
JALALPUR
7
00
01
97
Thana Number :- 515
6
00
03
06
5
00
01
14
4
00
01
45
3
00
03
06
2
00
03
71
1
00
00
50
MIRZAPUR
39
00
01
06
Thana Number :- 497
38(Field Channel)
00
02
39
244
00
00
52
32
00
12
50
31
00
06
44
30
00
05
30
29
00
00
20
28
00
05
50
26(Road)
00
05
27
12
00
02
38
13
00
08
88
14
00
00
20
21
00
02
93
20
00
13
09
1(Canal)
00
02
81
DHARAMPURA
516
00
03
00
Thana Number :- 305
442
00
04
18
443
00
00
20
450
00
00
20
453
00
15
44
454
00
00
73
457
00
00
20
452
00
17
08
458
00
05
06
459
00
00
20
439
00
07
82
438(Canal)
00
01
72
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3785
289(Canal)
00
04
66
243
00
00
77
242
00
00
20
288
00
01
99
287
00
03
06
286
00
02
83
285
00
03
48
284
00
03
08
283
00
02
44
282
00
03
19
281
00
02
56
280
00
01
61
279
00
12
77
278
00
00
64
277
00
00
20
JILKABAD
1436
00
01
39
Thana Number : 495
1435
00
10
04
1432
00
03
87
1432/1535
00
01
16
1431
00
04
16
1431/1534
00
01
26
1428
00
19
49
1427
00
05
71
1426
00
02
50
1423
00
05
42
1422
00
01
74
1421
00
01
28
1418
00
02
23
1419
00
00
32
1414
00
00
20
1417
00
06
58
1415
00
04
07
1416
00
00
20
1393
00
09
35
1400
00
03
91
1401
00
00
20
1399
00
00
20
1383
00
04
05
1382
00
00
93
1403
00
05
28
1382-1537
00
09
95
1404
00
04
89
1370
00
00
20
1371(Field Channel)
00
00
52
1372
00
00
54
1331
00
19
46
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3786
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1332
00
02
98
1332/1538
00
02
84
1333
00
02
18
1333/1539
00
01
60
1342
00
01
15
1329(Field Channel)
00
01
84
1328
00
00
20
1327/1536
00
00
70
1327
00
06
89
1321
00
04
60
1320
00
02
65
1322
00
01
54
1326
00
00
20
1322
00
05
10
1319
00
01
14
1316(Field Channel)
00
01
89
PIRARI Thana Number : 306
1371(Field Channel)
00
01
68
1427
00
27
00
1426
00
06
13
1428
00
29
29
1424
00
00
20
1429
00
00
20
1398
00
36
43
769
00
02
14
761
00
02
15
762
00
01
54
763
00
01
98
767
00
01
70
768
00
00
20
1430(Cart Track)
00
01
27
DARIYAW GANJ
2(Nala)
00
00
20
Thana Number : 303
MAHRAJ GANJ Thana Number :- 308
44(Field Channel)
00
01
80
43
00
02
97
42
00
04
33
41
00
04
25
40
00
02
64
39
00
02
03
38
00
02
67
37
00
03
98
35
00
03
86
34
00
04
21
32
00
05
01
31
00
00
86
30
00
10
13
23
00
02
07
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3787
29
00
00
20
22
00
03
48
21
00
06
26
20
00
03
00
18
00
02
41
14
00
02
49
13
00
03
61
12
00
03
52
11
00
11
17
10
00
01
79
4
00
04
63
2
00
01
21
1(Road)
00
02
57
BISHUNPURA
2350(Road)
00
03
04
Thana Number :- 314
2348
00
05
60
2346
00
00
20
2347
00
06
35
2340
00
03
54
2339
00
03
14
2338
00
03
65
2311
00
03
02
2315
00
03
44
2318
00
02
80
2294
00
02
98
2293
00
03
32
2290
00
06
41
2291
00
00
20
2286
00
05
17
2285
00
03
17
2228(Field Channel)
00
02
96
2227
00
16
26
2229
00
04
31
2230
00
02
09
2226
00
01
63
2231
00
04
19
2225
00
10
44
2224
00
00
85
2223(Field Channel)
00
01
43
2134
00
06
13
2129
00
08
70
2026
00
05
41
2027
00
02
21
2028
00
03
10
2025
00
00
20
2031
00
04
52
2032
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3788
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2039
00
04
80
2040
00
03
92
2042
00
04
74
2048
00
03
68
2022(Field Channel)
00
01
43
1911
00
04
33
1912
00
04
10
1913
00
03
05
1914
00
02
22
1915
00
04
50
1918
00
02
66
1919
00
00
48
1939
00
00
20
1990(Field Channel)
00
01
04
1950
00
02
52
1995
00
03
37
1994
00
00
20
1987
00
11
30
1988
00
00
20
1986
00
06
68
1985
00
06
61
1983
00
00
20
1958(Field Channel)
00
00
83
1952
00
03
70
1951
00
00
91
1953
00
07
22
1954
00
00
20
1956
00
05
72
1955
00
05
27
1860(Road)
00
01
08
1856(Road)
00
01
03
1811
00
07
26
1810
00
05
10
1808
00
00
20
1809
00
04
91
1804
00
04
30
1805
00
00
60
1802
00
03
02
1800
00
00
20
1799
00
02
96
1730(Field Channel)
00
03
44
1727
00
03
76
1726
00
04
40
1725
00
02
72
1719
00
00
20
1720
00
06
46
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3789
1717
00
05
72
1712
00
02
87
1711
00
03
19
1710
00
00
20
1707
00
03
35
1706
00
02
03
1705
00
02
16
1700
00
00
71
1702
00
02
70
1684
00
00
20
1683
00
00
20
1701
00
01
40
1685
00
03
54
1686
00
02
53
1688
00
01
64
1689
00
00
20
1687
00
02
90
1691
00
01
63
1692
00
03
32
1693
00
00
34
1493
00
02
16
1694
00
00
20
1281
00
05
64
1284
00
06
10
1280
00
00
20
1277
00
00
74
1278
00
05
57
1276
00
06
16
1275
00
05
02
1274
00
02
08
1272
00
00
95
1271
00
00
20
1270
00
00
20
1237
00
00
20
1238
00
00
20
1273
00
02
50
1236
00
04
08
1239
00
01
00
1240
00
04
30
1241
00
04
42
1200
00
00
20
1242
00
02
84
1199
00
00
72
1198
00
04
63
1169(Field Channel)
00
01
86
1120
00
09
14
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3790
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1121
00
00
20
1118
00
00
20
1123
00
00
20
1119
00
02
96
1122
00
06
05
1125
00
03
25
1131
00
00
20
1130
00
00
20
1126
00
02
63
1127
00
05
56
1128
00
06
78
1129
00
00
84
1054(Road)
00
01
84
706(Road)
00
01
30
1008
00
00
29
1009
00
08
96
1010
00
00
20
1011
00
09
49
1012
00
03
29
1013
00
02
89
1014
00
01
72
1015
00
01
55
1018
00
02
64
1019
00
08
87
935(Canal)
00
01
07
833
00
14
29
834
00
00
80
837
00
09
43
836
00
00
20
838(Field Channel)
00
01
06
845
00
00
20
846
00
18
40
848
00
00
20
847
00
02
09
886(Field Channel)
00
01
68
112
00
10
06
113
00
07
12
111
00
01
30
114
00
02
76
115
00
00
23
116
00
14
96
109
00
00
20
117
00
04
02
108
00
08
69
90
00
03
78
91
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3791
89
00
03
24
73
00
03
07
80
00
00
24
79
00
02
20
74
00
00
74
77
00
00
20
76
00
00
20
78
00
05
98
MOBARAKPUR
884
00
09
41
Thana Number :- 317
886
00
00
20
887
00
00
20
880
00
03
16
883
00
16
88
876
00
09
29
875(Road)
00
01
82
874(Road)
00
01
12
873
00
06
55
835
00
05
24
836
00
05
03
838
00
06
38
837
00
00
20
839
00
02
22
840
00
07
68
841
00
01
27
843
00
00
29
842
00
13
69
818(Field Channel)
00
01
38
737
00
17
15
733
00
17
22
732(Field Channel)
00
01
44
730
00
05
15
714
00
07
39
715
00
07
31
713
00
08
57
716
00
00
20
709
00
02
66
708
00
00
89
710
00
03
16
711
00
01
52
712
00
00
20
695
00
10
03
694
00
05
53
682
00
09
85
681
00
06
13
680
00
00
20
683
00
00
68
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3792
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
678
00
00
20
679
00
08
15
697(Road)
00
01
79
MALA SHERPUR
664(Road)
00
01
44
Thana Number :- 315
90
00
05
96
89(Field Channel)
00
02
71
91
00
00
55
88
00
02
24
77
00
10
13
74
00
00
20
78
00
09
08
79
00
01
19
80
00
00
20
72
00
11
72
71(Field Channel)
00
01
60
70
00
02
68
69
00
00
54
68
00
00
92
67
00
01
90
64
00
06
66
63
00
03
79
59
00
02
27
50
00
02
89
58
00
00
90
52
00
16
40
53
00
00
20
51
00
03
30
153(Field Channel)
00
01
37
MALA MIRZA TUKRA
151 (Field Channel)
00
01
20
Thana Number : 291
15
00
14
76
13
00
21
82
12(Road)
00
00
92
11(Road)
00
00
84
10(Road)
00
01
00
6
00
02
80
5
00
03
80
7
00
07
88
4
00
06
61
3
00
08
03
MAHAMDA
4288
00
05
31
Thana Number : 334
4287
00
00
31
4289
00
00
71
4286
00
11
42
4285
00
03
08
4296(Nala)
00
01
01
4772
00
06
87
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3793
4283
00
22
97
4282(Road)
00
01
96
4281(Road)
00
04
59
4280(Canal)
00
00
91
4279
00
24
86
4209(Road)
00
02
94
4207
00
00
38
4206
00
00
20
4201
00
10
10
4202
00
03
04
4198
00
04
64
4203
00
07
36
4204
00
01
08
MEHIAN
286
00
01
47
Thana Number : 290
285
00
06
77
288
00
00
20
284
00
00
30
289
00
06
97
342
00
00
37
297
00
08
59
296
00
00
20
340
00
00
42
339
00
00
77
338
00
01
56
298
00
10
30
323
00
06
88
1360
00
00
20
299
00
00
49
300
00
00
33
322
00
08
29
301
00
00
32
302
00
00
89
312
00
03
85
303
00
02
36
304
00
02
78
305
00
08
76
310
00
02
87
309
00
04
40
417(Canal)
00
02
72
419
00
18
35
420
00
01
16
421
00
06
77
425
00
00
20
424
00
00
20
423
00
12
72
428
00
12
16
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3794
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
430
00
06
69
429
00
00
20
195(Road)
00
02
27
658
00
02
88
657
00
03
65
656
00
00
20
660
00
02
93
661
00
03
52
659
00
02
06
105
00
01
65
662
00
03
16
104
00
03
86
663
00
04
34
103
00
08
48
664
00
00
38
102
00
09
52
49
00
04
60
48
00
04
40
44
00
21
22
665
00
00
20
45
00
00
76
41
00
08
30
42
00
03
96
37
00
00
20
43
00
04
41
1(Cart Track)
00
01
28
MAWNA Thana Number - 286
832 (Field Channel)
00
01
37
831
00
08
45
830
00
04
00
829
00
06
35
835
00
05
03
836
00
01
58
828
00
01
04
827
00
06
29
825
00
01
72
824
00
01
86
823
00
04
00
821
00
03
54
817
00
06
52
816
00
03
16
815
00
03
44
812
00
07
55
813
00
00
95
811
00
21
65
808
00
03
46
807
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3795
713(Field Channel)
00
06
55
716
00
01
55
719
00
17
09
720
00
02
09
407
00
04
92
408
00
04
40
409
00
04
01
410
00
02
47
411
00
03
30
412
00
05
02
413
00
14
02
401
00
05
25
414
00
02
96
399
00
14
36
387(Field Channel)
00
01
62
398
00
00
20
365
00
06
59
364
00
06
22
363
00
06
19
362
00
03
08
361
00
04
40
360
00
08
20
355 (Field Channel)
00
01
60
357
00
12
26
356
00
11
23
342
00
05
77
343
00
03
61
349
00
00
67
348
00
05
74
344
00
00
40
347/ 2035
00
09
17
346
00
00
76
347
00
00
48
2(Railway)
00
14
71
3
00
05
41
4
00
05
17
1272(Cart Track)
00
01
12
SANDHAN
1108(Cart Track)
00
00
88
Thana No : 342
1083
00
00
20
1083
00
33
08
1084
00
00
20
1082
00
21
24
1072(Cart Track)
00
00
89
1071
00
00
20
[F. No. R-25011/20/ 2013-OR-I]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
ubZ fnYyh] 27 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk-
1533-—dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slk izrhr gksrk gS fd yksd fgr esa ;g vko';d gS fd iVuk ls eksfrgkjh vkSj csrkyiqj
rd isVªksfy;e inkFkksZ ds ifjogu gsrq ftyk lkju] jkT; fcgkj esa bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkuh pkfg, A
vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slh ikbiykbu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, vko';d izrhr gksrk gS fd ml Hkwfe esa ftlds Hkhrj mDr
ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkus dk izLrko gS vkSj tks bl vf/lwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa o£.kr gS] mi;ksx dk vtZu fd;k tk, A
vr% vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbUl (Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/dkj dk vtZu) vf/fu;e] 1962 (1962
dk 50) dh /kjk 3 dh mi/kjk(1) }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] mDr Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/dkj dk vtZu djus ds vius vk'k;
dh ?kks"k.kk djrh gSA
dksbZ O;fDr] tks mDr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa fgrc¼ gS] ml rkjh[k ls ftldks] Hkkjr ds jkti=k esa ;Fkk izdkf'kr bl
vfèklwpuk dh izfr;ka lk/kj.k turk dks miyC/ djk nh tkrh gS] bDdhl fnu ds vUnj] Hkwfe ds Hkhrj ikbiykbu fcNk, tkus gsrq mi;ksx
ds vf/dkj ds vtZu ds fy,] Jh v:.k dqekj >k] fc-iz-ls- o l{ke izkf/dkjh bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM] (ikbiykbu fMohtu)
iVuk] iks-vks- <syok] flikjk] ftyk iVuk] fiu% 800020] fcgkj dks fyf[kr :i eas vk{ksi Hkst ldsxkA
vuqlwph
ftyk % lkju
jkT; % fcgkj
ekStk@xzke
losZ@Cykd@la- (IyksV la-)
lc&Mho&la-
{ks=kiQy
gsDVs;j
vkjs
oxZ ehVj
1
2
3
4
5
6
esFkokyh;k
463¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
00
60
Fkkuk uacj % 343
467
00
02
72
466
00
04
91
465
00
02
05
464
00
00
20
468
00
16
81
462
00
01
30
469
00
02
99
471
00
00
20
470
00
16
42
459
00
00
20
458
00
02
69
837 ¼vu ykbUM dsuky½
00
01
72
456
00
07
55
450
00
06
95
451
00
00
54
316
00
00
77
315
00
10
02
314
00
01
36
88
00
00
60
89
00
03
28
83
00
00
20
91
00
00
20
92
00
00
78
87
00
01
42
93
00
05
47
3796
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3797
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
95
00
07
94
100
00
00
20
96
00
00
20
97
00
09
53
98
00
02
41
99
00
00
20
110
00
00
20
141¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
01
50
66
00
00
20
64
00
02
10
63
00
08
65
62
00
01
44
60
00
01
63
61
00
06
36
33
00
00
20
32
00
00
20
31
00
00
20
30
00
00
20
29
00
00
20
34
00
05
78
35
00
11
77
36
00
00
78
28
00
07
00
26
00
00
20
27
00
01
84
pu pkSju
825
00
07
38
Fkkuk uacj % 345
824
00
29
39
816
00
00
20
815
00
00
20
814
00
02
83
813
00
02
82
224
00
05
65
225
00
07
81
223
00
00
85
222
00
01
02
221
00
01
03
220
00
00
95
219
00
00
41
218
00
00
47
217
00
00
73
226
00
31
46
216
00
01
58
215
00
01
96
3798
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
214
00
02
52
213
00
03
64
234
00
00
20
212¼jkLrk½
00
01
13
211¼jkLrk½
00
03
31
210¼jkLrk½
00
02
23
177
00
03
67
178
00
05
77
176
00
00
20
175
00
06
70
174
00
05
46
173
00
04
01
gluiqjk
480
00
00
52
Fkkuk uacj % 344
481
00
13
03
472¼fQYM psuy½
00
01
43
470
00
05
00
469
00
01
08
468
00
00
81
471
00
09
96
472¼fQYM psuy½
00
01
68
473
00
11
16
464
00
05
09
465
00
04
91
472¼fQYM psuy½
00
01
34
466¼fQYM psuy½
00
01
72
467
00
04
11
185
00
19
24
188
00
00
20
186
00
19
32
187@492
00
00
20
176
00
03
35
182
00
00
20
183
00
45
41
jruiqjk
20
00
05
07
Fkkuk uacj % 283
19
00
14
21
18
00
06
00
14
00
06
60
12
00
17
66
11
00
07
18
972¼jkLrk½
00
01
59
971¼jkLrk½
00
01
45
970¼jkLrk½
00
02
19
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3799
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
cjgkeiqj
4958¼ukyk½
00
01
95
Fkkuk uacj % 277
4277
00
00
20
4278
00
05
44
4281
00
04
94
4280
00
08
54
4279
00
07
53
4291¼ukyk½
00
01
77
4282
00
00
20
4293
00
07
23
4292
00
19
61
4295¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
00
92
4329
00
06
84
4330
00
14
91
4339¼ukyk½
00
01
08
4340
00
23
96
4326¼ukyk½
00
02
73
4353
00
23
27
4352
00
17
76
4351
00
26
83
4350
00
10
27
3555¼ukyk½
00
01
34
3547
00
00
42
3546
00
00
58
3545
00
00
75
3542
00
01
26
3541
00
01
14
3540
00
00
20
3535
00
02
08
3534
00
01
92
3533
00
02
22
3530
00
02
81
3531
00
00
20
3529
00
03
43
3526
00
03
00
3523
00
02
96
3524
00
00
20
3522
00
00
69
3521
00
05
40
3518
00
05
74
3519
00
00
20
3516
00
03
10
3517
00
01
12
3515
00
02
26
3514
00
01
16
3800
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3513
00
01
85
3511
00
03
52
3509
00
00
20
3510
00
06
12
3506
00
04
34
3507
00
00
20
3501
00
00
20
3505
00
01
13
3502
00
06
13
3500¼ukyk½
00
00
88
3293
00
18
46
3294
00
08
87
3295
00
03
23
3296
00
00
20
3292
00
02
74
3291
00
00
20
3275
00
03
80
3272
00
04
66
3268
00
01
57
3267
00
01
52
3266
00
04
01
3265
00
03
56
3264
00
03
54
3247
00
03
74
3246
00
03
59
3245
00
01
64
3226
00
00
20
3244
00
02
90
3227
00
00
20
3243
00
04
22
3228
00
00
20
3242
00
03
46
3241
00
03
29
3229
00
01
54
3232
00
01
31
3240
00
02
36
3239
00
02
16
3233
00
02
40
3238
00
01
11
3237
00
00
88
3234
00
04
82
3235
00
01
50
3211¼ukyk½
00
01
31
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3801
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3210¼ukyk½
00
01
22
lh/kokyh;k
926¼ukyk½
00
00
92
Fkkuk uacj % 276
924
00
00
82
925
00
02
32
917
00
08
49
916
00
03
10
915
00
02
75
918
00
08
70
923
00
00
20
922
00
00
20
921
00
00
36
920
00
00
63
919
00
00
35
904
00
06
77
553
00
02
87
552
00
03
63
551
00
05
94
550
00
04
94
549
00
03
87
544
00
03
27
545
00
00
20
543
00
02
73
542
00
01
88
541
00
00
87
540
00
00
64
539
00
00
37
538
00
00
33
536
00
00
20
537
00
00
20
Qdqyh
3099¼ukyk½
00
01
38
Fkkuk uacj % 260
3005
00
03
09
3006
00
02
50
3008
00
00
20
3007
00
01
59
3003
00
00
20
3004
00
04
13
3013
00
00
20
3012
00
00
20
3043
00
00
20
3042
00
00
20
3014
00
06
42
3015
00
00
20
3020
00
05
33
3802
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3021
00
02
05
3022
00
08
71
3037
00
00
20
3029
00
05
78
3030
00
02
44
3035
00
00
20
3031
00
00
87
3032
00
01
06
3028
00
00
20
3027
00
08
09
3026
00
00
20
3025
00
00
20
3033
00
04
26
3034
00
00
20
2924¼ukyk½
00
00
71
2882
00
08
37
2881
00
00
20
2883
00
03
70
2886
00
02
93
2885
00
04
69
2889
00
01
14
2904
00
00
70
2884
00
00
20
2905
00
05
01
2906
00
00
86
2907
00
00
20
2911
00
05
45
2910
00
03
03
2909
00
00
20
2711¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
00
67
2678
00
00
20
2677
00
07
58
2673
00
00
20
2674
00
01
29
2675
00
03
28
2676
00
00
49
2672¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
00
86
2670
00
07
52
2664
00
04
28
2663
00
00
99
2662
00
00
20
2669
00
00
20
2666
00
02
05
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3803
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
2667
00
00
20
2665
00
02
21
2632
00
04
05
2642
00
00
20
2631
00
00
20
2630
00
00
39
2633
00
01
91
2634
00
00
68
2641
00
00
20
2635
00
02
19
2629
00
00
89
2628
00
04
00
2627
00
00
89
2610¼ukyk½
00
09
37
2626
00
00
41
2624
00
00
20
1197
00
00
97
1205¼jkLrk½
00
00
65
1226
00
03
49
2622
00
00
20
1227
00
03
26
1229
00
03
71
1230
00
03
57
1231
00
03
45
1232
00
01
44
1233
00
00
20
214¼jkLrk½
00
06
06
1256
00
00
20
1257
00
04
76
1258
00
03
21
1259
00
03
32
1260
00
03
45
1261
00
02
82
1253
00
00
20
1265
00
05
59
1262
00
00
91
1264
00
00
20
1265
00
01
41
1989
00
00
20
1988
00
01
57
1987
00
05
91
1986
00
08
01
1985
00
12
81
3804
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
1971
00
00
20
1984
00
04
32
1973
00
06
76
1974
00
04
46
1975
00
00
37
1949
00
03
85
1669
00
00
20
1948
00
03
53
1947
00
02
46
1946
00
06
58
1947
00
01
17
1945
00
03
66
1903
00
01
49
1904
00
00
20
1902
00
00
56
1897
00
19
50
1894
00
00
20
1901
00
00
37
1900
00
00
68
1899
00
00
28
1898
00
00
20
1895
00
00
20
1896
00
01
41
1850
00
03
45
1849
00
15
00
1848
00
00
20
1847
00
03
87
1802
00
00
20
1845
00
01
63
1846
00
06
99
1803
00
00
20
1804
00
00
20
1826
00
10
94
1827
00
00
20
1806
00
01
77
1825
00
03
32
1821
00
04
90
1824
00
01
34
1822
00
06
01
1823
00
02
02
1819
00
00
20
1820
00
02
01
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3805
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
jktey fijkjh
212
00
13
53
Fkkuk uacj % 261
211
00
00
20
218@1110
00
00
20
218
00
00
20
219
00
00
20
220
00
00
20
213
00
07
07
217
00
05
01
216
00
04
71
215
00
04
54
236
00
07
63
235
00
00
20
237
00
03
09
238
00
03
52
234
00
00
20
239
00
03
40
240
00
03
93
241
00
06
96
255
00
00
20
252
00
12
30
253
00
00
20
251
00
07
94
262@1112
00
00
20
250
00
04
25
262
00
00
20
249
00
04
34
267
00
00
14
268
00
00
35
269
00
04
64
283
00
01
21
280
00
15
14
279
00
00
20
281
00
01
26
308
00
05
16
306
00
19
29
316
00
00
20
354
00
02
02
353
00
01
51
352
00
02
51
351
00
02
02
350
00
02
62
342
00
13
65
349
00
02
07
348
00
01
29
3806
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
343
00
05
57
341
00
05
23
378
00
02
65
379
00
03
16
386
00
00
95
385
00
00
43
380
00
03
90
384
00
00
20
374
00
02
75
373
00
00
44
381
00
04
30
382
00
04
05
383
00
00
25
411¼ukyk½
00
01
68
420
00
06
54
427
00
00
20
419
00
06
87
421
00
07
07
422
00
00
20
424
00
03
24
423
00
04
40
425
00
02
49
Vsduokl
3252¼unh½
00
04
52
Fkkuk uacj % 263
3263
00
01
13
3250¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
01
26
3230
00
03
91
3231
00
00
20
3229
00
17
53
3228
00
07
74
3237
00
00
20
3170
00
06
94
3172
00
00
20
3152
00
00
20
3171
00
01
07
3175
00
00
20
3169
00
03
07
3163
00
00
52
3164
00
00
20
3168
00
09
38
3179
00
00
05
3144
00
02
01
3180
00
07
91
3186
00
00
20
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3807
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3143
00
00
04
3142
00
00
20
3103
00
01
88
3104
00
00
20
3102
00
16
07
3101
00
01
39
3100
00
00
20
3107
00
01
99
3106
00
00
20
3108
00
01
17
3097
00
04
33
3098
00
00
20
3111
00
00
53
3096
00
05
62
3095
00
03
88
3094
00
07
40
3092
00
00
20
3091
00
00
20
3093
00
00
20
3068
00
01
64
3031
00
01
10
3029
00
03
78
3066
00
01
73
3064
00
02
21
3063
00
02
34
3062
00
06
55
3050
00
00
27
3061
00
00
96
3060
00
00
97
3058
00
01
71
3057
00
01
01
3056
00
02
63
3055
00
02
50
3054
00
02
02
3251
00
00
65
3252
00
00
20
3053
00
00
20
3250
00
00
87
3249
00
00
88
3248
00
00
74
3247
00
00
31
3246
00
04
60
3045
00
00
20
3808
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
2913
00
00
48
3204¼ukyk½
00
02
69
3005¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
01
55
jsokjh
1032¼ukyk½
00
01
47
Fkkuk uacj % 262
2757¼ukyk½
00
01
75
1142
00
02
82
1143
00
02
27
1144
00
00
50
1145
00
00
34
1141
00
06
31
1140
00
01
89
1139
00
01
15
1138
00
01
64
1137
00
00
20
1136
00
08
85
1135
00
02
63
1134
00
01
13
1133
00
00
20
1128
00
06
90
1129
00
00
20
1127
00
00
20
1147
00
00
20
1148
00
08
57
1120
00
04
84
1119
00
01
57
1121
00
00
47
1118
00
03
95
1117
00
03
89
1150
00
01
12
1116
00
01
55
1114
00
00
20
1113
00
09
89
1112
00
02
93
1111
00
03
37
1101
00
00
33
1096
00
00
20
1097
00
03
43
1098
00
03
60
1095
00
00
31
1094
00
01
44
1093
00
04
60
1099
00
01
14
1092
00
03
96
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3809
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
1091
00
05
40
1090
00
00
72
1089
00
05
01
1082
00
00
55
1083
00
07
38
1084
00
00
20
1076
00
01
09
1075
00
07
46
1074¼ukyk½
00
01
49
1073¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
02
09
1054
00
04
93
1055
00
00
25
1056
00
00
20
1053
00
12
61
1052
00
06
01
1051
00
06
08
1050
00
03
60
1018
00
01
69
1049
00
01
21
1048
00
00
20
1019
00
07
61
1020
00
00
20
1022
00
24
95
1031
00
00
20
1014
00
04
08
1029
00
00
48
1026
00
00
20
1023
00
07
38
1024
00
03
60
1025
00
04
91
1059¼ukyk½
00
00
79
1071¼ukyk½
00
00
95
506
00
00
33
507
00
00
20
508
00
07
65
510
00
00
37
499
00
00
20
511
00
11
94
549@2780
00
00
20
512
00
00
28
514
00
04
74
515
00
05
28
517
00
00
20
3810
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
516
00
04
77
518
00
02
38
532
00
00
44
528
00
00
61
531
00
00
20
529
00
10
64
527
00
02
58
525
00
00
20
526
00
00
20
375
00
00
20
376
00
05
13
394
00
05
88
392
00
00
20
377
00
03
78
378
00
05
54
379
00
01
09
381
00
04
97
368
00
00
20
382
00
01
81
383
00
01
94
386
00
00
20
385
00
00
20
384
00
03
82
364
00
01
87
367
00
00
20
365
00
02
16
362
00
00
20
363
00
00
39
337
00
04
58
336
00
00
20
338
00
01
22
346
00
03
26
339
00
04
75
340
00
00
20
335
00
00
20
334
00
03
37
333
00
03
47
608¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
02
74
332¼ukyk½
00
02
82
330
00
00
20
329
00
02
49
324
00
03
22
323
00
04
38
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3811
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
322
00
03
12
321
00
01
72
319
00
02
26
318
00
02
18
317
00
04
14
316
00
04
37
315¼ukyk½
00
01
25
314
00
03
05
313
00
04
69
309
00
03
28
308
00
00
24
297
00
00
20
295
00
04
51
294
00
00
92
293
00
03
20
280
00
02
62
279
00
02
36
274
00
00
20
269
00
00
20
275
00
03
29
268
00
03
74
263
00
01
08
264
00
05
30
266
00
00
20
265
00
00
20
257
00
00
65
256
00
02
54
255
00
03
08
254
00
03
90
250
00
00
62
249
00
02
66
248
00
02
21
247
00
04
23
246
00
01
99
238
00
00
20
277¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
00
25
ikS[kj HkhUMk
389
00
02
88
Fkkuk uacj % 236
388
00
11
47
387
00
00
20
385
00
00
20
386
00
01
64
382¼jkLrk½
00
02
70
366
00
01
91
3812
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
365
00
00
37
367
00
01
80
370
00
01
54
368
00
00
27
369
00
04
36
378
00
00
20
377
00
00
27
376
00
02
68
375
00
02
83
301
00
00
20
349
00
10
47
339
00
00
54
348
00
03
19
347
00
02
37
341
00
00
20
346
00
01
45
345
00
00
74
344
00
01
17
342
00
00
20
343
00
04
54
292
00
00
20
280¼ukyk½
00
01
62
284
00
00
42
291
00
04
67
255
00
02
66
254
00
00
14
256
00
06
67
258
00
05
63
261
00
01
79
260
00
00
70
262
00
00
20
259
00
06
02
264
00
01
01
211
00
00
20
263
00
00
20
265
00
05
29
209
00
01
06
208
00
02
43
266
00
01
23
207
00
04
55
197
00
03
10
198
00
02
25
199
00
04
68
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3813
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
195
00
00
20
200
00
01
04
190
00
00
20
201
00
00
99
166
00
09
89
15
00
00
20
167
00
04
26
192
00
00
32
168
00
04
41
188
00
01
99
189
00
00
20
169
00
07
09
187
00
00
20
183
00
00
20
170
00
04
50
171
00
02
56
¹iQk- la- vkj&25011@20@2013&vksvkj&Iº
iou oqQekj] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 27th July, 2013
S.O. 1533.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that a
pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited in Dist. Saran in the State of Bihar for ‘Patna to Motihari and
Baitalpur Pipeline’ for the transportation of Petroleum Product;
And, whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary
to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which is described in the
Schedule annexed to this notification;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals
Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention
to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on
which the copies of the notification issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of
India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the
pipeline under the land, to Shri Arun Kumar Jha B.A.S. & Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited. (Pipelines
Division) P.O. Dhelwan, Sipara, Dist. Patna (Bihar) Pin – 800020.
SCHEDULE
Dist.: Saran
State : Bihar
Mouja /Village
Survey/BlockNo.
Sub-Div-No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq. mtr.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
METHWALIA
463(Cart Track)
00
00
60
Thana Number : 343
467
00
02
72
466
00
04
91
465
00
02
05
464
00
00
20
468
00
16
81
462
00
01
30
469
00
02
99
3814
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
471
00
00
20
470
00
16
42
459
00
00
20
458
00
02
69
837(Unlined Canal)
00
01
72
456
00
07
55
450
00
06
95
451
00
00
54
316
00
00
77
315
00
10
02
314
00
01
36
88
00
00
60
89
00
03
28
83
00
00
20
91
00
00
20
92
00
00
78
87
00
01
42
93
00
05
47
95
00
07
94
100
00
00
20
96
00
00
20
97
00
09
53
98
00
02
41
99
00
00
20
110
00
00
20
141(Cart Track)
00
01
50
66
00
00
20
64
00
02
10
63
00
08
65
62
00
01
44
60
00
01
63
61
00
06
36
33
00
00
20
32
00
00
20
31
00
00
20
30
00
00
20
29
00
00
20
34
00
05
78
35
00
11
77
36
00
00
78
28
00
07
00
26
00
00
20
27
00
01
84
CHAN CHOURAN
825
00
07
38
Thana Number - 345
824
00
29
39
816
00
00
20
815
00
00
20
814
00
02
83
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3815
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
813
00
02
82
224
00
05
65
225
00
07
81
223
00
00
85
222
00
01
02
221
00
01
03
220
00
00
95
219
00
00
41
218
00
00
47
217
00
00
73
226
00
31
46
216
00
01
58
215
00
01
96
214
00
02
52
213
00
03
64
234
00
00
20
212(Road)
00
01
13
211(Road)
00
03
31
210(Road)
00
02
23
177
00
03
67
178
00
05
77
176
00
00
20
175
00
06
70
174
00
05
46
173
00
04
01
HASANPURA
480
00
00
52
Thana Number : 344
481
00
13
03
472(Field Channel)
00
01
43
470
00
05
00
469
00
01
08
468
00
00
81
471
00
09
96
472(Field Channel)
00
01
68
473
00
11
16
464
00
05
09
465
00
04
91
472(Field Channel)
00
01
34
466(Field Channel)
00
01
72
467
00
04
11
185
00
19
24
188
00
00
20
186
00
19
32
187/492
00
00
20
176
00
03
35
182
00
00
20
183
00
45
41
RATANPURA
20
00
05
07
Thana Number - 283
19
00
14
21
3816
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
18
00
06
00
14
00
06
60
12
00
17
66
11
00
07
18
972(Road)
00
01
59
971(Road)
00
01
45
970(Road)
00
02
19
BARHAMPUR
4958(Nala)
00
01
95
Thana Number - 277
4277
00
00
20
4278
00
05
44
4281
00
04
94
4280
00
08
54
4279
00
07
53
4291(Nala)
00
01
77
4282
00
00
20
4293
00
07
23
4292
00
19
61
4295(Cart Track)
00
00
92
4329
00
06
84
4330
00
14
91
4339(Nala)
00
01
08
4340
00
23
96
4326(Nala)
00
02
73
4353
00
23
27
4352
00
17
76
4351
00
26
83
4350
00
10
27
3555(Nala)
00
01
34
3547
00
00
42
3546
00
00
58
3545
00
00
75
3542
00
01
26
3541
00
01
14
3540
00
00
20
3535
00
02
08
3534
00
01
92
3533
00
02
22
3530
00
02
81
3531
00
00
20
3529
00
03
43
3526
00
03
00
3523
00
02
96
3524
00
00
20
3522
00
00
69
3521
00
05
40
3518
00
05
74
3519
00
00
20
3516
00
03
10
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3817
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3517
00
01
12
3515
00
02
26
3514
00
01
16
3513
00
01
85
3511
00
03
52
3509
00
00
20
3510
00
06
12
3506
00
04
34
3507
00
00
20
3501
00
00
20
3505
00
01
13
3502
00
06
13
3500(Nala)
00
00
88
3293
00
18
46
3294
00
08
87
3295
00
03
23
3296
00
00
20
3292
00
02
74
3291
00
00
20
3275
00
03
80
3272
00
04
66
3268
00
01
57
3267
00
01
52
3266
00
04
01
3265
00
03
56
3264
00
03
54
3247
00
03
74
3246
00
03
59
3245
00
01
64
3226
00
00
20
3244
00
02
90
3227
00
00
20
3243
00
04
22
3228
00
00
20
3242
00
03
46
3241
00
03
29
3229
00
01
54
3232
00
01
31
3240
00
02
36
3239
00
02
16
3233
00
02
40
3238
00
01
11
3237
00
00
88
3234
00
04
82
3235
00
01
50
3211(Nala)
00
01
31
3210(Nala)
00
01
22
SIDHWALIA
926(Nala)
00
00
92
3818
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
Thana Number - 276
924
00
00
82
925
00
02
32
917
00
08
49
916
00
03
10
915
00
02
75
918
00
08
70
923
00
00
20
922
00
00
20
921
00
00
36
920
00
00
63
919
00
00
35
904
00
06
77
553
00
02
87
552
00
03
63
551
00
05
94
550
00
04
94
549
00
03
87
544
00
03
27
545
00
00
20
543
00
02
73
542
00
01
88
541
00
00
87
540
00
00
64
539
00
00
37
538
00
00
33
536
00
00
20
537
00
00
20
PHAKULI
3099(Nala)
00
01
38
(Thana No : 260)
3005
00
03
09
3006
00
02
50
3008
00
00
20
3007
00
01
59
3003
00
00
20
3004
00
04
13
3013
00
00
20
3012
00
00
20
3043
00
00
20
3042
00
00
20
3014
00
06
42
3015
00
00
20
3020
00
05
33
3021
00
02
05
3022
00
08
71
3037
00
00
20
3029
00
05
78
3030
00
02
44
3035
00
00
20
3031
00
00
87
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3819
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3032
00
01
06
3028
00
00
20
3027
00
08
09
3026
00
00
20
3025
00
00
20
3033
00
04
26
3034
00
00
20
2924(Nala)
00
00
71
2882
00
08
37
2881
00
00
20
2883
00
03
70
2886
00
02
93
2885
00
04
69
2889
00
01
14
2904
00
00
70
2884
00
00
20
2905
00
05
01
2906
00
00
86
2907
00
00
20
2911
00
05
45
2910
00
03
03
2909
00
00
20
2711(Cart Track)
00
00
67
2678
00
00
20
2677
00
07
58
2673
00
00
20
2674
00
01
29
2675
00
03
28
2676
00
00
49
2672(Cart Track)
00
00
86
2670
00
07
52
2664
00
04
28
2663
00
00
99
2662
00
00
20
2669
00
00
20
2666
00
02
05
2667
00
00
20
2665
00
02
21
2632
00
04
05
2642
00
00
20
2631
00
00
20
2630
00
00
39
2633
00
01
91
2634
00
00
68
2641
00
00
20
2635
00
02
19
2629
00
00
89
2628
00
04
00
3820
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
2627
00
00
89
2610(Nala)
00
09
37
2626
00
00
41
2624
00
00
20
1197
00
00
97
1205(Road)
00
00
65
1226
00
03
49
2622
00
00
20
1227
00
03
26
1229
00
03
71
1230
00
03
57
1231
00
03
45
1232
00
01
44
1233
00
00
20
214(Road)
00
06
06
1256
00
00
20
1257
00
04
76
1258
00
03
21
1259
00
03
32
1260
00
03
45
1261
00
02
82
1253
00
00
20
1265
00
05
59
1262
00
00
91
1264
00
00
20
1265
00
01
41
1989
00
00
20
1988
00
01
57
1987
00
05
91
1986
00
08
01
1985
00
12
81
1971
00
00
20
1984
00
04
32
1973
00
06
76
1974
00
04
46
1975
00
00
37
1949
00
03
85
1669
00
00
20
1948
00
03
53
1947
00
02
46
1946
00
06
58
1947
00
01
17
1945
00
03
66
1903
00
01
49
1904
00
00
20
1902
00
00
56
1897
00
19
50
1894
00
00
20
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3821
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
1901
00
00
37
1900
00
00
68
1899
00
00
28
1898
00
00
20
1895
00
00
20
1896
00
01
41
1850
00
03
45
1849
00
15
00
1848
00
00
20
1847
00
03
87
1802
00
00
20
1845
00
01
63
1846
00
06
99
1803
00
00
20
1804
00
00
20
1826
00
10
94
1827
00
00
20
1806
00
01
77
1825
00
03
32
1821
00
04
90
1824
00
01
34
1822
00
06
01
1823
00
02
02
1819
00
00
20
1820
00
02
01
RAJMAL PIRARI
212
00
13
53
(Thana No. 261)
211
00
00
20
218/1110
00
00
20
218
00
00
20
219
00
00
20
220
00
00
20
213
00
07
07
217
00
05
01
216
00
04
71
215
00
04
54
236
00
07
63
235
00
00
20
237
00
03
09
238
00
03
52
234
00
00
20
239
00
03
40
240
00
03
93
241
00
06
96
255
00
00
20
252
00
12
30
253
00
00
20
251
00
07
94
262/1112
00
00
20
3822
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
250
00
04
25
262
00
00
20
249
00
04
34
267
00
00
14
268
00
00
35
269
00
04
64
283
00
01
21
280
00
15
14
279
00
00
20
281
00
01
26
308
00
05
16
306
00
19
29
316
00
00
20
354
00
02
02
353
00
01
51
352
00
02
51
351
00
02
02
350
00
02
62
342
00
13
65
349
00
02
07
348
00
01
29
343
00
05
57
341
00
05
23
378
00
02
65
379
00
03
16
386
00
00
95
385
00
00
43
380
00
03
90
384
00
00
20
374
00
02
75
373
00
00
44
381
00
04
30
382
00
04
05
383
00
00
25
411(Nala)
00
01
68
420
00
06
54
427
00
00
20
419
00
06
87
421
00
07
07
422
00
00
20
424
00
03
24
423
00
04
40
425
00
02
49
TEKNWAS
3252(Nadi)
00
04
52
Thana No. 263
3263
00
01
13
3250(Cart Track)
00
01
26
3230
00
03
91
3231
00
00
20
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3823
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3229
00
17
53
3228
00
07
74
3237
00
00
20
3170
00
06
94
3172
00
00
20
3152
00
00
20
3171
00
01
07
3175
00
00
20
3169
00
03
07
3163
00
00
52
3164
00
00
20
3168
00
09
38
3179
00
00
05
3144
00
02
01
3180
00
07
91
3186
00
00
20
3143
00
00
04
3142
00
00
20
3103
00
01
88
3104
00
00
20
3102
00
16
07
3101
00
01
39
3100
00
00
20
3107
00
01
99
3106
00
00
20
3108
00
01
17
3097
00
04
33
3098
00
00
20
3111
00
00
53
3096
00
05
62
3095
00
03
88
3094
00
07
40
3092
00
00
20
3091
00
00
20
3093
00
00
20
3068
00
01
64
3031
00
01
10
3029
00
03
78
3066
00
01
73
3064
00
02
21
3063
00
02
34
3062
00
06
55
3050
00
00
27
3061
00
00
96
3060
00
00
97
3058
00
01
71
3057
00
01
01
3056
00
02
63
3055
00
02
50
3824
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3054
00
02
02
3251
00
00
65
3252
00
00
20
3053
00
00
20
3250
00
00
87
3249
00
00
88
3248
00
00
74
3247
00
00
31
3246
00
04
60
3045
00
00
20
2913
00
00
48
3204(Nala)
00
02
69
3005(Cart Track)
00
01
55
REWARI No. 262
1032(Nala)
00
01
47
2757(Nala)
00
01
75
1142
00
02
82
1143
00
02
27
1144
00
00
50
1145
00
00
34
1141
00
06
31
1140
00
01
89
1139
00
01
15
1138
00
01
64
1137
00
00
20
1136
00
08
85
1135
00
02
63
1134
00
01
13
1133
00
00
20
1128
00
06
90
1129
00
00
20
1127
00
00
20
1147
00
00
20
1148
00
08
57
1120
00
04
84
1119
00
01
57
1121
00
00
47
1118
00
03
95
1117
00
03
89
1150
00
01
12
1116
00
01
55
1114
00
00
20
1113
00
09
89
1112
00
02
93
1111
00
03
37
1101
00
00
33
1096
00
00
20
1097
00
03
43
1098
00
03
60
1095
00
00
31
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3825
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
1094
00
01
44
1093
00
04
60
1099
00
01
14
1092
00
03
96
1091
00
05
40
1090
00
00
72
1089
00
05
01
1082
00
00
55
1083
00
07
38
1084
00
00
20
1076
00
01
09
1075
00
07
46
1074(Nala)
00
01
49
1073(Cart Track)
00
02
09
1054
00
04
93
1055
00
00
25
1056
00
00
20
1053
00
12
61
1052
00
06
01
1051
00
06
08
1050
00
03
60
1018
00
01
69
1049
00
01
21
1048
00
00
20
1019
00
07
61
1020
00
00
20
1022
00
24
95
1031
00
00
20
1014
00
04
08
1029
00
00
48
1026
00
00
20
1023
00
07
38
1024
00
03
60
1025
00
04
91
1059(Nala)
00
00
79
1071(Nala)
00
00
95
506
00
00
33
507
00
00
20
508
00
07
65
510
00
00
37
499
00
00
20
511
00
11
94
549/2780
00
00
20
512
00
00
28
514
00
04
74
515
00
05
28
517
00
00
20
516
00
04
77
3826
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
518
00
02
38
532
00
00
44
528
00
00
61
531
00
00
20
529
00
10
64
527
00
02
58
525
00
00
20
526
00
00
20
375
00
00
20
376
00
05
13
394
00
05
88
392
00
00
20
377
00
03
78
378
00
05
54
379
00
01
09
381
00
04
97
368
00
00
20
382
00
01
81
383
00
01
94
386
00
00
20
385
00
00
20
384
00
03
82
364
00
01
87
367
00
00
20
365
00
02
16
362
00
00
20
363
00
00
39
337
00
04
58
336
00
00
20
338
00
01
22
346
00
03
26
339
00
04
75
340
00
00
20
335
00
00
20
334
00
03
37
333
00
03
47
608(Cart Track)
00
02
74
332(Nala)
00
02
82
330
00
00
20
329
00
02
49
324
00
03
22
323
00
04
38
322
00
03
12
321
00
01
72
319
00
02
26
318
00
02
18
317
00
04
14
316
00
04
37
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3827
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
315(Nala)
00
01
25
314
00
03
05
313
00
04
69
309
00
03
28
308
00
00
24
297
00
00
20
295
00
04
51
294
00
00
92
293
00
03
20
280
00
02
62
279
00
02
36
274
00
00
20
269
00
00
20
275
00
03
29
268
00
03
74
263
00
01
08
264
00
05
30
266
00
00
20
265
00
00
20
257
00
00
65
256
00
02
54
255
00
03
08
254
00
03
90
250
00
00
62
249
00
02
66
248
00
02
21
247
00
04
23
246
00
01
99
238
00
00
20
277(Cart Track)
00
00
25
POKHAR BHINDA
389
00
02
88
Thana Number - 236
388
00
11
47
387
00
00
20
385
00
00
20
386
00
01
64
382(Road)
00
02
70
366
00
01
91
365
00
00
37
367
00
01
80
370
00
01
54
368
00
00
27
369
00
04
36
378
00
00
20
377
00
00
27
376
00
02
68
375
00
02
83
301
00
00
20
349
00
10
47
339
00
00
54
348
00
03
19
347
00
02
37
341
00
00
20
346
00
01
45
345
00
00
74
344
00
01
17
342
00
00
20
343
00
04
54
292
00
00
20
280(Nala)
00
01
62
284
00
00
42
291
00
04
67
255
00
02
66
254
00
00
14
256
00
06
67
258
00
05
63
261
00
01
79
260
00
00
70
262
00
00
20
259
00
06
02
264
00
01
01
211
00
00
20
263
00
00
20
265
00
05
29
209
00
01
06
208
00
02
43
266
00
01
23
207
00
04
55
197
00
03
10
198
00
02
25
199
00
04
68
195
00
00
20
200
00
01
04
190
00
00
20
201
00
00
99
166
00
09
89
15
00
00
20
167
00
04
26
192
00
00
32
168
00
04
41
188
00
01
99
189
00
00
20
169
00
07
09
187
00
00
20
183
00
00
20
170
00
04
50
171
00
02
56
[F. No. R-25011/20/2013-OR-I]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
3828
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
ubZ fnYyh] 27 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1534-—dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slk izrhr gksrk gS fd yksd fgr esa ;g vko';d gS fd iVuk ls eksfrgkjh vkSj csrkyiqj rd
isVªksfy;e inkFkksZ ds ifjogu gsrq ftyk lkju] jkT; fcgkj esa bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkuh pkfg, A
vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slh ikbiykbu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, vko';d izrhr gksrk gS fd ml Hkwfe esa ftlds Hkhrj mDr
ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkus dk izLrko gS vkSj tks bl vf/lwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa o£.kr gS] mi;ksx dk vtZu fd;k tk, A
vr% vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbUl (Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/dkj dk vtZu) vf/fu;e] 1962
(1962 dk 50) dh /kjk 3 dh mi&/kjk (1) }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] mDr Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/dkj dk vtZu djus ds
vius vk'k; dh ?kks"k.kk djrh gSA
dksbZ O;fDr] tks mDr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa fgrc¼ gS] ml rkjh[k ls ftldks] Hkkjr ds jkti=k esa ;Fkk izdkf'kr bl
vfèklwpuk dh izfr;ka lk/kj.k turk dks miyC/ djk nh tkrh gS] bDdhl fnu ds vUnj] Hkwfe ds Hkhrj ikbiykbu fcNk, tkus gsrq mi;ksx
ds vf/dkj ds vtZu ds fy,] Jh v:.k dqekj >k] fc-iz-ls- o l{ke izkf/dkjh bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM] (ikbiykbu fMohtu)
iVuk] iks-vks- <syok] flikjk] ftyk iVuk] fiu% 800020] fcgkj dks fyf[kr :i eas vk{ksi Hkst ldsxk A
vuqlwph
ftyk % lkju
jkT; % fcgkj
ekStk@xzke
losZ@Cykd@la- (IyksV la-)
lc&Mho&la-
{ks=kiQy
gsDVs;j
vkjs
oxZ ehVj
1
2
3
4
5
6
legqrk
legqrk
legqrk
legqrk
legqrk
6407
00
02
50
Fkkuk uacj
Fkkuk uacj
Fkkuk uacj
Fkkuk uacj
Fkkuk uacj-&234
-&234
-&234
-&234
-&234
6406
00
06
99
6405
00
03
36
6404
00
08
34
6410
00
00
20
6397
00
02
69
6412
00
02
27
6413
00
00
20
6402
00
02
88
6401
00
03
83
6403
00
01
08
6400
00
02
80
6432
00
00
20
6431
00
00
20
6433
00
00
14
6399
00
01
76
6434
00
02
52
6392
00
01
23
6440
00
02
59
6441
00
04
68
6439
00
00
58
6442
00
03
87
6443
00
04
80
6444
00
00
80
6447
00
00
20
6445
00
05
23
6446
00
06
24
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3829
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3830
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
6451
00
00
62
6553
00
04
90
6552
00
01
92
3971
00
00
20
6479
00
00
20
3969
00
37
45
3968
00
00
20
3980
00
05
28
3962
00
00
25
3961
00
02
10
3960
00
00
20
3956
00
00
20
3946
00
01
12
3981
00
03
92
3982
00
00
76
3983
00
00
20
3984
00
00
20
3945
00
09
24
3944
00
01
75
3943
00
12
44
3922
00
00
20
3995
00
00
96
3931
00
01
95
3932
00
00
20
3930
00
02
70
3929
00
03
22
3928
00
02
27
3927
00
02
53
4000
00
00
20
3926
00
08
85
4001
00
08
65
4002
00
00
45
4004
00
00
20
4005
00
15
92
4006¼jkLrk½
00
01
34
4007¼jkLrk½
00
01
31
4008¼jkLrk½
00
02
18
4009
00
06
47
4010
00
02
29
4011
00
14
20
4012
00
05
28
4013
00
15
28
4014
00
02
01
4024
00
11
09
4027
00
27
87
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3831
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4031
00
01
27
4034
00
04
28
4033
00
03
18
4032
00
03
74
3859
00
05
05
3851
00
22
57
3852
00
02
77
3853
00
02
10
3850
00
00
20
3823
00
04
80
3854
00
00
20
3830
00
00
20
3822
00
06
06
3824
00
00
56
3749
00
03
79
3748
00
04
48
3750
00
01
74
3745
00
00
20
3751
00
06
95
3752
00
00
20
3753
00
00
20
3744
00
00
20
3743
00
03
44
3754
00
09
82
3755
00
03
35
3756
00
02
86
3757
00
03
41
3740
00
00
20
3760
00
04
73
3759
00
00
20
3761
00
07
32
4143
00
00
20
3762
00
09
58
4142
00
01
69
4141
00
01
65
4139
00
01
01
4140
00
07
84
4138
00
01
07
4159
00
11
39
4157
00
00
20
4160
00
00
66
4158
00
02
27
4186
00
12
75
4184
00
00
20
4184
00
01
59
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3832
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
4185
00
06
76
4187
00
02
81
4188
00
08
23
4189
00
08
86
4190
00
01
79
4191
00
00
20
4214¼jkLrk½
00
04
15
4256
00
05
00
4222
00
00
36
4223
00
07
54
4228
00
01
88
4229
00
00
20
4227
00
04
86
4226
00
00
20
4230
00
06
26
4231
00
00
20
4233
00
06
65
4235
00
03
95
4238
00
00
20
4236
00
03
54
4237
00
05
61
5791
00
01
56
4240
00
00
66
5790
00
06
74
5789@7184
00
00
20
5789
00
06
99
5788@7182
00
00
79
5788
00
06
92
5786
00
00
20
5787
00
02
00
dksik
dksik
dksik
dksik
dksik
767
00
13
75
Fkkuk uacj
Fkkuk uacj
Fkkuk uacj
Fkkuk uacj
Fkkuk uacj-&231
-&231
-&231
-&231
-&231
763
00
00
20
766
00
05
90
764
00
01
46
765
00
04
33
760
00
02
32
583
00
00
66
584
00
09
60
585
00
02
86
586
00
00
20
580
00
06
06
579
00
00
42
590
00
00
20
591
00
08
18
578
00
03
72
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3833
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
592
00
06
23
564
00
02
04
563
00
08
29
593
00
00
20
562
00
01
01
559
00
02
29
560
00
04
88
558
00
06
18
557
00
00
84
556
00
10
55
533
00
00
20
555
00
01
53
545
00
00
20
534
00
04
45
542
00
02
67
535
00
00
84
541
00
05
24
540
00
03
90
397
00
05
67
396
00
00
27
321
00
00
20
322
00
00
20
317
00
00
63
316
00
00
73
315
00
00
91
313
00
05
81
283¼jkLrk½
00
00
87
254
00
04
19
253
00
06
93
252
00
04
34
251
00
00
11
250
00
00
47
249
00
01
62
248
00
02
08
247
00
05
61
246
00
00
73
181
00
04
91
185
00
06
01
182
00
00
20
183
00
00
20
184
00
02
63
173
00
00
20
171
00
00
20
172
00
06
89
168
00
00
74
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3834
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
170
00
04
70
169
00
01
30
156
00
15
24
155
00
00
20
157
00
03
92
159
00
00
93
158
00
04
05
110
00
02
95
111
00
02
57
127
00
00
20
112
00
05
26
113
00
04
22
114
00
07
24
115
00
00
51
116
00
01
77
117
00
00
20
12
00
16
72
120
00
00
20
119
00
00
20
6
00
14
22
7
00
00
56
5
00
16
49
eqlsgjh
eqlsgjh
eqlsgjh
eqlsgjh
eqlsgjh
815
00
01
32
Fkkuk uacj
Fkkuk uacj
Fkkuk uacj
Fkkuk uacj
Fkkuk uacj-&233
-&233
-&233
-&233
-&233
809
00
09
87
810
00
08
12
806
00
00
20
811
00
00
20
812
00
00
20
805
00
07
84
799
00
05
33
804
00
05
70
803
00
03
72
802
00
02
01
782
00
06
33
783
00
00
40
784
00
00
20
781
00
09
05
780
00
00
40
776
00
07
77
777
00
01
15
775
00
04
45
772
00
04
37
771
00
00
64
770
00
03
38
768
00
03
80
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3835
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
767
00
05
09
766
00
01
85
760
00
04
35
759
00
04
24
748
00
04
19
745
00
01
66
742
00
02
52
741
00
00
20
736
00
07
78
740
00
01
01
737
00
07
82
700
00
07
62
697
00
04
57
696
00
04
69
690
00
02
04
694
00
00
20
695
00
03
96
691
00
04
80
692
00
00
97
687
00
11
71
686
00
00
99
685
00
06
01
675
00
00
20
684
00
04
14
683
00
05
88
682
00
02
13
681
00
01
52
679
00
00
20
680
00
00
20
vuoy
vuoy
vuoy
vuoy
vuoy
1448
00
02
90
Fkkuk uacj
Fkkuk uacj
Fkkuk uacj
Fkkuk uacj
Fkkuk uacj-&199
-&199
-&199
-&199
-&199
1449
00
00
20
1447
00
02
81
1450
00
00
31
1445
00
03
68
1444
00
01
58
1443
00
01
54
1439
00
01
71
1438
00
02
16
1437
00
02
35
1435
00
04
10
1434
00
00
39
1367¼jkLrk½
00
00
75
1430
00
00
20
1431
00
04
03
1432
00
02
14
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3836
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1429
00
01
25
1510¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
01
49
1368
00
00
76
1369
00
09
41
1364
00
09
92
1351
00
02
51
1363
00
00
20
1355
00
00
20
1350
00
06
05
1372
00
00
20
1373
00
02
32
1374
00
00
20
1346
00
00
20
1349
00
04
33
1348
00
03
53
1320
00
00
20
1347
00
01
48
1321
00
02
81
1322
00
02
89
1323
00
00
20
1324
00
01
95
1319
00
01
20
1317
00
00
20
1326
00
00
20
1325
00
02
35
1298
00
04
92
1299
00
02
90
1297
00
00
20
1301
00
02
09
1289
00
02
63
1300
00
00
38
1290
00
05
08
1288
00
03
22
1292
00
00
20
1287
00
01
84
1286
00
00
41
1291
00
06
31
1283
00
03
98
1284
00
02
52
1285
00
00
36
1281
00
07
46
1274
00
01
50
1275
00
03
92
1280
00
00
37
1277
00
00
20
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3837
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
1276
00
11
88
1265
00
03
16
1264
00
00
20
1266
00
04
39
1267
00
06
64
1144
00
00
61
1143
00
02
90
1142
00
00
20
1140
00
00
20
1268¼jkLrk½
00
02
21
ihvkuks
ihvkuks
ihvkuks
ihvkuks
ihvkuks
2091¼jkLrk½
00
02
83
Fkkuk uacj
Fkkuk uacj
Fkkuk uacj
Fkkuk uacj
Fkkuk uacj-&200
-&200
-&200
-&200
-&200
2493
00
10
54
2494
00
00
20
2488
00
02
07
2487
00
00
20
2489
00
08
03
2490
00
03
52
2473
00
00
20
2474
00
00
20
2491
00
13
58
2472
00
01
92
2471¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
02
63
2099
00
38
05
2098
00
01
87
2097
00
00
20
2096
00
00
20
2081
00
04
63
2076
00
07
52
2075
00
00
20
2077
00
08
48
2079
00
00
32
2078
00
07
94
2069
00
00
20
2067
00
05
91
2066
00
04
92
2065
00
05
61
2064
00
00
25
2062
00
00
20
2059
00
00
20
2061
00
06
20
2060
00
00
98
2040
00
00
20
2104
00
02
00
2107
00
00
39
2106
00
03
60
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3838
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2105
00
04
72
2121
00
00
20
2039
00
01
24
2122
00
00
85
2038
00
01
75
2035
00
00
20
2037
00
05
09
2036
00
02
08
1975
00
03
76
1976
00
06
53
1980
00
08
02
1979
00
00
20
1981
00
06
24
1982
00
16
80
1973¼fQYM psuy½
00
01
64
1969
00
00
48
1968
00
00
20
1966
00
07
32
1967
00
07
37
1964
00
00
20
1965
00
05
34
1950
00
01
22
1944
00
03
41
1945
00
00
83
1946
00
00
20
1943
00
11
16
1941
00
00
70
1938
00
00
20
1942
00
07
71
1940
00
00
20
1424¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
03
39
1413
00
00
31
1411
00
00
20
1399
00
08
21
1400
00
02
97
1398
00
00
42
1401
00
03
12
1402
00
10
30
1396@2628
00
00
20
1396
00
00
20
1395¼ukyk½
00
00
97
1394¼ukyk½
00
00
97
1391
00
07
61
1389
00
25
33
1392¼ukyk½
00
01
68
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3839
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
1393¼ukyk½
00
02
00
1438
00
06
85
1441
00
33
92
1442
00
00
20
1489¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
01
54
39
00
09
74
38
00
34
58
36
00
08
20
37¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
01
35
42
00
02
64
41
00
00
20
43
00
09
25
44
00
14
10
21
00
06
00
20¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
01
06
17
00
00
25
18
00
13
83
19
00
00
20
8
00
00
20
9
00
10
64
10 ¼fQYM psuy½
00
01
02
ljh iÎh
ljh iÎh
ljh iÎh
ljh iÎh
ljh iÎh
163@166 ¼fQYM psuy½
00
01
39
Fkkuk uacj
Fkkuk uacj
Fkkuk uacj
Fkkuk uacj
Fkkuk uacj-&152@1
-&152@1
-&152@1
-&152@1
-&152@1
161
00
05
00
162
00
00
20
157
00
17
26
lk/kiqj Nrj
lk/kiqj Nrj
lk/kiqj Nrj
lk/kiqj Nrj
lk/kiqj Nrj
661¼ukyk½
00
01
82
Fkkuk uacj
Fkkuk uacj
Fkkuk uacj
Fkkuk uacj
Fkkuk uacj-&197
-&197
-&197
-&197
-&197
660
00
00
56
587
00
05
46
586
00
03
80
584
00
00
20
588
00
03
21
591
00
00
20
581
00
02
45
582
00
00
20
580
00
14
95
578
00
00
20
529
00
03
62
576
00
00
40
574 ¼ukyk½
00
01
92
523
00
02
60
524
00
00
20
525
00
09
35
526
00
08
05
528 ¼ukyk½
00
01
20
527
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3840
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
531
00
00
20
530
00
05
54
532
00
00
20
533
00
00
20
529
00
04
75
549
00
05
06
548
00
05
53
550
00
01
04
547
00
12
15
546
00
01
09
544
00
00
20
540
00
00
53
539
00
00
20
542
00
04
85
541
00
04
78
463 ¼ukyk½
00
01
27
452
00
00
20
449
00
00
20
451
00
03
84
450
00
05
81
447
00
00
20
446
00
01
12
445
00
05
50
433
00
00
20
444
00
00
20
442
00
01
13
441
00
03
01
434
00
01
08
428
00
00
20
435
00
03
87
436
00
00
94
427
00
00
95
426
00
07
42
425
00
04
03
424
00
00
97
422
00
10
70
421
00
02
34
610@666 ¼dsuky½
00
02
73
418 ¼dsuky½
00
01
43
csyljk
csyljk
csyljk
csyljk
csyljk
2974
00
00
26
Fkkuk uacj
Fkkuk uacj
Fkkuk uacj
Fkkuk uacj
Fkkuk uacj-&152
-&152
-&152
-&152
-&152
2973
00
09
02
2958¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
02
27
2957
00
09
93
2956
00
00
20
2955
00
03
29
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3841
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
1764¼ukyk½
00
01
43
1763
00
10
68
1762
00
12
89
1781
00
03
56
1782
00
01
38
1783
00
00
20
1780
00
06
81
1779
00
00
20
1784
00
04
81
1785
00
03
33
1787
00
01
85
1788
00
00
20
1786
00
01
53
1758
00
00
20
1793
00
07
68
1792
00
01
41
1794
00
03
49
1797
00
03
20
1796
00
10
90
1799¼jkLrk½
00
00
92
1915¼jkLrk½
00
01
59
1737
00
05
46
1738
00
01
35
1739
00
04
65
1692
00
05
06
1690
00
00
20
1691
00
04
27
1684
00
00
20
1689
00
00
20
1687
00
01
56
1688
00
04
19
1693
00
00
20
1655
00
02
82
1654
00
00
20
1694
00
02
58
1696
00
01
05
1695
00
00
40
1636
00
00
84
1697
00
00
89
1699
00
00
21
1700
00
00
20
1633
00
01
22
1635
00
01
27
1634
00
01
09
1632
00
03
91
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3842
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1627
00
00
46
1631
00
03
26
1630
00
01
94
1628
00
01
71
1629
00
00
61
1626
00
02
07
1619
00
00
20
1625
00
00
20
1620
00
06
38
1622
00
00
20
1621
00
01
14
1608
00
00
20
1614
00
00
52
1613
00
00
20
1610
00
06
06
1611
00
05
17
1612¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
02
56
1375
00
09
13
1376
00
12
09
1373
00
01
00
1374
00
04
92
1377
00
00
20
1372
00
00
35
1367
00
01
71
1364
00
00
21
1365
00
04
07
1361
00
02
16
1358
00
03
73
1366
00
00
20
1355
00
02
39
1354
00
01
87
1353
00
00
56
1351
00
04
29
1255
00
05
10
1256
00
04
70
1250
00
01
77
1249
00
01
46
1246
00
03
30
1244
00
01
14
1243
00
01
64
1242
00
01
68
1240
00
05
74
1241
00
00
20
1239
00
02
09
1238
00
00
20
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3843
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
1236
00
05
09
1237
00
00
20
1155
00
03
58
1158
00
02
96
1259
00
00
20
1162
00
02
29
1161
00
00
20
1163
00
02
30
1165
00
00
20
1166
00
02
11
1167
00
02
77
1164
00
00
20
1170
00
09
32
1171
00
00
20
1172
00
00
20
1180
00
01
29
1179
00
00
20
1177
00
03
07
1173
00
00
37
1176
00
01
97
1178
00
00
20
1175
00
02
65
1174
00
05
15
1196¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
00
83
815
00
02
00
814
00
02
13
813
00
01
77
816
00
00
20
817
00
02
40
819
00
02
58
818
00
05
01
840
00
02
23
842
00
02
37
843
00
01
87
844
00
02
67
846
00
03
72
847
00
03
54
849
00
13
73
875
00
05
21
876
00
03
55
896
00
01
24
897
00
01
17
898
00
02
39
901
00
04
56
902
00
02
23
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3844
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
905
00
02
35
906
00
02
86
908
00
00
91
909
00
02
24
911
00
01
46
910
00
05
75
939
00
00
42
940
00
01
51
941
00
01
35
942
00
00
54
944
00
06
81
945
00
03
96
943
00
00
20
952
00
01
80
947
00
02
16
951
00
04
39
954
00
00
20
955
00
00
20
956
00
00
20
972
00
00
20
973
00
00
20
948
00
00
50
949
00
00
44
950
00
06
68
980
00
03
14
981
00
00
20
979
00
02
63
976
00
00
20
977
00
03
56
978
00
03
23
983
00
00
40
1046 ¼jkLrk½
00
00
97
408
00
00
92
407
00
04
21
405
00
00
77
406
00
02
74
403
00
00
20
404
00
00
20
421
00
00
20
422
00
04
52
420
00
00
20
423
00
07
14
425
00
00
20
424
00
00
20
430
00
00
66
426
00
02
31
427
00
03
92
390
00
00
89
389
00
09
62
360
00
00
20
385
00
00
20
386
00
00
20
361
00
00
89
388
00
03
11
387
00
03
17
369
00
03
18
370
00
00
20
366
00
04
27
368
00
01
62
367
00
04
48
365
00
03
30
255
00
00
20
256
00
06
97
257
00
00
20
320
00
00
82
259
00
01
12
266
00
07
25
267
00
00
32
265
00
01
99
268
00
05
86
264
00
00
20
271
00
00
20
269
00
04
61
279
00
00
20
33
00
02
52
20
00
06
86
19
00
02
85
16
00
00
20
21
00
00
20
18
00
03
11
17
00
05
36
14
00
02
85
13
00
01
00
12
00
04
30
22
00
00
20
11
00
08
96
9
00
05
04
10
00
00
20
8
00
00
55
106 ¼dsuky½
00
02
36
¹iQk- la- vkj&25011@20@2013&vksvkj&Iº
iou oqQekj] voj lfpo
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3845
New Delhi, the 27th July, 2013
S.O. 1534.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that a
pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited in Dist. Saran in the State of Bihar for ‘Patna to Motihari and
Baitalpur Pipeline’ for the transportation of Petroleum Product;
And, whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary
to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which is described in the
Schedule annexed to this notification;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals
Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention
to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on
which the copies of the notification issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of
India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the
pipeline under the land, to Shri Arun Kumar Jha B.A.S. & Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited (Pipelines
Division) P.O. Dhelwan, Sipara, Dist. Patna (Bihar.) Pin-800020.
SCHEDULE
Dist.: Saran
State : Bihar
Mouja / Village
Survey/BlockNo.
Sub-Div.-No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
SAMAHUTA
6407
00
02
50
Thana Number : 234
6406
00
06
99
6405
00
03
36
6404
00
08
34
6410
00
00
20
6397
00
02
69
6412
00
02
27
6413
00
00
20
6402
00
02
88
6401
00
03
83
6403
00
01
08
6400
00
02
80
6432
00
00
20
6431
00
00
20
6433
00
00
14
6399
00
01
76
6434
00
02
52
6392
00
01
23
6440
00
02
59
6441
00
04
68
6439
00
00
58
6442
00
03
87
6443
00
04
80
6444
00
00
80
6447
00
00
20
6445
00
05
23
6446
00
06
24
6451
00
00
62
6553
00
04
90
6552
00
01
92
3846
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3847
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3971
00
00
20
6479
00
00
20
3969
00
37
45
3968
00
00
20
3980
00
05
28
3962
00
00
25
3961
00
02
10
3960
00
00
20
3956
00
00
20
3946
00
01
12
3981
00
03
92
3982
00
00
76
3983
00
00
20
3984
00
00
20
3945
00
09
24
3944
00
01
75
3943
00
12
44
3922
00
00
20
3995
00
00
96
3931
00
01
95
3932
00
00
20
3930
00
02
70
3929
00
03
22
3928
00
02
27
3927
00
02
53
4000
00
00
20
3926
00
08
85
4001
00
08
65
4002
00
00
45
4004
00
00
20
4005
00
15
92
4006 (Road)
00
01
34
4007 (Road)
00
01
31
4008 (Road)
00
02
18
4009
00
06
47
4010
00
02
29
4011
00
14
20
4012
00
05
28
4013
00
15
28
4014
00
02
01
4024
00
11
09
4027
00
27
87
4031
00
01
27
4034
00
04
28
4033
00
03
18
4032
00
03
74
3859
00
05
05
3851
00
22
57
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3848
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
3852
00
02
77
3853
00
02
10
3850
00
00
20
3823
00
04
80
3854
00
00
20
3830
00
00
20
3822
00
06
06
3824
00
00
56
3749
00
03
79
3748
00
04
48
3750
00
01
74
3745
00
00
20
3751
00
06
95
3752
00
00
20
3753
00
00
20
3744
00
00
20
3743
00
03
44
3754
00
09
82
3755
00
03
35
3756
00
02
86
3757
00
03
41
3740
00
00
20
3760
00
04
73
3759
00
00
20
3761
00
07
32
4143
00
00
20
3762
00
09
58
4142
00
01
69
4141
00
01
65
4139
00
01
01
4140
00
07
84
4138
00
01
07
4159
00
11
39
4157
00
00
20
4160
00
00
66
4158
00
02
27
4186
00
12
75
4184
00
00
20
4184
00
01
59
4185
00
06
76
4187
00
02
81
4188
00
08
23
4189
00
08
86
4190
00
01
79
4191
00
00
20
4214 (Road)
00
04
15
4256
00
05
00
4222
00
00
36
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3849
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4223
00
07
54
4228
00
01
88
4229
00
00
20
4227
00
04
86
4226
00
00
20
4230
00
06
26
4231
00
00
20
4233
00
06
65
4235
00
03
95
4238
00
00
20
4236
00
03
54
4237
00
05
61
5791
00
01
56
4240
00
00
66
5790
00
06
74
5789/7184
00
00
20
5789
00
06
99
5788/7182
00
00
79
5788
00
06
92
5786
00
00
20
5787
00
02
00
KOPA
767
00
13
75
Thana Number:231
763
00
00
20
766
00
05
90
764
00
01
46
765
00
04
33
760
00
02
32
583
00
00
66
584
00
09
60
585
00
02
86
586
00
00
20
580
00
06
06
579
00
00
42
590
00
00
20
591
00
08
18
578
00
03
72
592
00
06
23
564
00
02
04
563
00
08
29
593
00
00
20
562
00
01
01
559
00
02
29
560
00
04
88
558
00
06
18
557
00
00
84
556
00
10
55
533
00
00
20
555
00
01
53
3196—M-8
Mss. 443 to 480
3849
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3850
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
545
00
00
20
534
00
04
45
542
00
02
67
535
00
00
84
541
00
05
24
540
00
03
90
397
00
05
67
396
00
00
27
321
00
00
20
322
00
00
20
317
00
00
63
316
00
00
73
315
00
00
91
313
00
05
81
283(Road)
00
00
87
254
00
04
19
253
00
06
93
252
00
04
34
251
00
00
11
250
00
00
47
249
00
01
62
248
00
02
08
247
00
05
61
246
00
00
73
181
00
04
91
185
00
06
01
182
00
00
20
183
00
00
20
184
00
02
63
173
00
00
20
171
00
00
20
172
00
06
89
168
00
00
74
170
00
04
70
169
00
01
30
156
00
15
24
155
00
00
20
157
00
03
92
159
00
00
93
158
00
04
05
110
00
02
95
111
00
02
57
127
00
00
20
112
00
05
26
113
00
04
22
114
00
07
24
115
00
00
51
116
00
01
77
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3851
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
117
00
00
20
12
00
16
72
120
00
00
20
119
00
00
20
6
00
14
22
7
00
00
56
5
00
16
49
MUSEHRI
815
00
01
32
Thana Number : 233
809
00
09
87
810
00
08
12
806
00
00
20
811
00
00
20
812
00
00
20
805
00
07
84
799
00
05
33
804
00
05
70
803
00
03
72
802
00
02
01
782
00
06
33
783
00
00
40
784
00
00
20
781
00
09
05
780
00
00
40
776
00
07
77
777
00
01
15
775
00
04
45
772
00
04
37
771
00
00
64
770
00
03
38
768
00
03
80
767
00
05
09
766
00
01
85
760
00
04
35
759
00
04
24
748
00
04
19
745
00
01
66
742
00
02
52
741
00
00
20
736
00
07
78
740
00
01
01
737
00
07
82
700
00
07
62
697
00
04
57
696
00
04
69
690
00
02
04
694
00
00
20
695
00
03
96
691
00
04
80
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3852
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
692
00
00
97
687
00
11
71
686
00
00
99
685
00
06
01
675
00
00
20
684
00
04
14
683
00
05
88
682
00
02
13
681
00
01
52
679
00
00
20
680
00
00
20
ANWAL
1448
00
02
90
Thana Number : 199
1449
00
00
20
1447
00
02
81
1450
00
00
31
1445
00
03
68
1444
00
01
58
1443
00
01
54
1439
00
01
71
1438
00
02
16
1437
00
02
35
1435
00
04
10
1434
00
00
39
1367(Road)
00
00
75
1430
00
00
20
1431
00
04
03
1432
00
02
14
1429
00
01
25
1510(Cart Track)
00
01
49
1368
00
00
76
1369
00
09
41
1364
00
09
92
1351
00
02
51
1363
00
00
20
1355
00
00
20
1350
00
06
05
1372
00
00
20
1373
00
02
32
1374
00
00
20
1346
00
00
20
1349
00
04
33
1348
00
03
53
1320
00
00
20
1347
00
01
48
1321
00
02
81
1322
00
02
89
1323
00
00
20
1324
00
01
95
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3853
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
1319
00
01
20
1317
00
00
20
1326
00
00
20
1325
00
02
35
1298
00
04
92
1299
00
02
90
1297
00
00
20
1301
00
02
09
1289
00
02
63
1300
00
00
38
1290
00
05
08
1288
00
03
22
1292
00
00
20
1287
00
01
84
1286
00
00
41
1291
00
06
31
1283
00
03
98
1284
00
02
52
1285
00
00
36
1281
00
07
46
1274
00
01
50
1275
00
03
92
1280
00
00
37
1277
00
00
20
1276
00
11
88
1265
00
03
16
1264
00
00
20
1266
00
04
39
1267
00
06
64
1144
00
00
61
1143
00
02
90
1142
00
00
20
1140
00
00
20
1268(Road)
00
02
21
PIANO
2091(Road)
00
02
83
Thana Number : 200
2493
00
10
54
2494
00
00
20
2488
00
02
07
2487
00
00
20
2489
00
08
03
2490
00
03
52
2473
00
00
20
2474
00
00
20
2491
00
13
58
2472
00
01
92
2471(Cart Track)
00
02
63
2099
00
38
05
2098
00
01
87
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3854
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2097
00
00
20
2096
00
00
20
2081
00
04
63
2076
00
07
52
2075
00
00
20
2077
00
08
48
2079
00
00
32
2078
00
07
94
2069
00
00
20
2067
00
05
91
2066
00
04
92
2065
00
05
61
2064
00
00
25
2062
00
00
20
2059
00
00
20
2061
00
06
20
2060
00
00
98
2040
00
00
20
2104
00
02
00
2107
00
00
39
2106
00
03
60
2105
00
04
72
2121
00
00
20
2039
00
01
24
2122
00
00
85
2038
00
01
75
2035
00
00
20
2037
00
05
09
2036
00
02
08
1975
00
03
76
1976
00
06
53
1980
00
08
02
1979
00
00
20
1981
00
06
24
1982
00
16
80
1973(Field Channel)
00
01
64
1969
00
00
48
1968
00
00
20
1966
00
07
32
1967
00
07
37
1964
00
00
20
1965
00
05
34
1950
00
01
22
1944
00
03
41
1945
00
00
83
1946
00
00
20
1943
00
11
16
1941
00
00
70
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3855
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
1938
00
00
20
1942
00
07
71
1940
00
00
20
1424(Cart Track)
00
03
39
1413
00
00
31
1411
00
00
20
1399
00
08
21
1400
00
02
97
1398
00
00
42
1401
00
03
12
1402
00
10
30
1396/2628
00
00
20
1396
00
00
20
1395(Nala)
00
00
97
1394(Nala)
00
00
97
1391
00
07
61
1389
00
25
33
1392(Nala)
00
01
68
1393(Nala)
00
02
00
1438
00
06
85
1441
00
33
92
1442
00
00
20
1489(Cart Track)
00
01
54
39
00
09
74
38
00
34
58
36
00
08
20
37(Cart Track)
00
01
35
42
00
02
64
41
00
00
20
43
00
09
25
44
00
14
10
21
00
06
00
20(Cart Track)
00
01
06
17
00
00
25
18
00
13
83
19
00
00
20
8
00
00
20
9
00
10
64
10(Field Channel)
00
01
02
SAREA PATTI Thana No : 152/1
163/166 (Field Channel)
00
01
39
161
00
05
00
162
00
00
20
157
00
17
26
SADHPURCHHATAR Thana Number : 197 661(Nala)
00
01
82
660
00
00
56
587
00
05
46
586
00
03
80
584
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3856
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
588
00
03
21
591
00
00
20
581
00
02
45
582
00
00
20
580
00
14
95
578
00
00
20
529
00
03
62
576
00
00
40
574(Nala)
00
01
92
523
00
02
60
524
00
00
20
525
00
09
35
526
00
08
05
528(Nala)
00
01
20
527
00
00
20
531
00
00
20
530
00
05
54
532
00
00
20
533
00
00
20
529
00
04
75
549
00
05
06
548
00
05
53
550
00
01
04
547
00
12
15
546
00
01
09
544
00
00
20
540
00
00
53
539
00
00
20
542
00
04
85
541
00
04
78
463(Nala)
00
01
27
452
00
00
20
449
00
00
20
451
00
03
84
450
00
05
81
447
00
00
20
446
00
01
12
445
00
05
50
433
00
00
20
444
00
00
20
442
00
01
13
441
00
03
01
434
00
01
08
428
00
00
20
435
00
03
87
436
00
00
94
427
00
00
95
426
00
07
42
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3857
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
425
00
04
03
424
00
00
97
422
00
10
70
421
00
02
34
610/666(canal)
00
02
73
418(canal)
00
01
43
BELSARA
2974
00
00
26
Thana Number:152
2973
00
09
02
2958(Cart Track)
00
02
27
2957
00
09
93
2956
00
00
20
2955
00
03
29
1764(Nala)
00
01
43
1763
00
10
68
1762
00
12
89
1781
00
03
56
1782
00
01
38
1783
00
00
20
1780
00
06
81
1779
00
00
20
1784
00
04
81
1785
00
03
33
1787
00
01
85
1788
00
00
20
1786
00
01
53
1758
00
00
20
1793
00
07
68
1792
00
01
41
1794
00
03
49
1797
00
03
20
1796
00
10
90
1799(Road)
00
00
92
1915(Road)
00
01
59
1737
00
05
46
1738
00
01
35
1739
00
04
65
1692
00
05
06
1690
00
00
20
1691
00
04
27
1684
00
00
20
1689
00
00
20
1687
00
01
56
1688
00
04
19
1693
00
00
20
1655
00
02
82
1654
00
00
20
1694
00
02
58
1696
00
01
05
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3858
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1695
00
00
40
1636
00
00
84
1697
00
00
89
1699
00
00
21
1700
00
00
20
1633
00
01
22
1635
00
01
27
1634
00
01
09
1632
00
03
91
1627
00
00
46
1631
00
03
26
1630
00
01
94
1628
00
01
71
1629
00
00
61
1626
00
02
07
1619
00
00
20
1625
00
00
20
1620
00
06
38
1622
00
00
20
1621
00
01
14
1608
00
00
20
1614
00
00
52
1613
00
00
20
1610
00
06
06
1611
00
05
17
1612(Cart Track)
00
02
56
1375
00
09
13
1376
00
12
09
1373
00
01
00
1374
00
04
92
1377
00
00
20
1372
00
00
35
1367
00
01
71
1364
00
00
21
1365
00
04
07
1361
00
02
16
1358
00
03
73
1366
00
00
20
1355
00
02
39
1354
00
01
87
1353
00
00
56
1351
00
04
29
1255
00
05
10
1256
00
04
70
1250
00
01
77
1249
00
01
46
1246
00
03
30
1244
00
01
14
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3859
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
1243
00
01
64
1242
00
01
68
1240
00
05
74
1241
00
00
20
1239
00
02
09
1238
00
00
20
1236
00
05
09
1237
00
00
20
1155
00
03
58
1158
00
02
96
1259
00
00
20
1162
00
02
29
1161
00
00
20
1163
00
02
30
1165
00
00
20
1166
00
02
11
1167
00
02
77
1164
00
00
20
1170
00
09
32
1171
00
00
20
1172
00
00
20
1180
00
01
29
1179
00
00
20
1177
00
03
07
1173
00
00
37
1176
00
01
97
1178
00
00
20
1175
00
02
65
1174
00
05
15
1196(Cart Track)
00
00
83
815
00
02
00
814
00
02
13
813
00
01
77
816
00
00
20
817
00
02
40
819
00
02
58
818
00
05
01
840
00
02
23
842
00
02
37
843
00
01
87
844
00
02
67
846
00
03
72
847
00
03
54
849
00
13
73
875
00
05
21
876
00
03
55
896
00
01
24
897
00
01
17
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3860
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
898
00
02
39
901
00
04
56
902
00
02
23
905
00
02
35
906
00
02
86
908
00
00
91
909
00
02
24
911
00
01
46
910
00
05
75
939
00
00
42
940
00
01
51
941
00
01
35
942
00
00
54
944
00
06
81
945
00
03
96
943
00
00
20
952
00
01
80
947
00
02
16
951
00
04
39
954
00
00
20
955
00
00
20
956
00
00
20
972
00
00
20
973
00
00
20
948
00
00
50
949
00
00
44
950
00
06
68
980
00
03
14
981
00
00
20
979
00
02
63
976
00
00
20
977
00
03
56
978
00
03
23
983
00
00
40
1046(Road)
00
00
97
408
00
00
92
407
00
04
21
405
00
00
77
406
00
02
74
403
00
00
20
404
00
00
20
421
00
00
20
422
00
04
52
420
00
00
20
423
00
07
14
425
00
00
20
424
00
00
20
430
00
00
66
426
00
02
31
427
00
03
92
390
00
00
89
389
00
09
62
360
00
00
20
385
00
00
20
386
00
00
20
361
00
00
89
388
00
03
11
387
00
03
17
369
00
03
18
370
00
00
20
366
00
04
27
368
00
01
62
367
00
04
48
365
00
03
30
255
00
00
20
256
00
06
97
257
00
00
20
320
00
00
82
259
00
01
12
266
00
07
25
267
00
00
32
265
00
01
99
268
00
05
86
264
00
00
20
271
00
00
20
269
00
04
61
279
00
00
20
33
00
02
52
20
00
06
86
19
00
02
85
16
00
00
20
21
00
00
20
18
00
03
11
17
00
05
36
14
00
02
85
13
00
01
00
12
00
04
30
22
00
00
20
11
00
08
96
9
00
05
04
10
00
00
20
8
00
00
55
106(Canal)
00
02
36
[F. No. R-25011/20/ 2013-OR-I]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3861
ubZ fnYyh] 27 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk-
dk-vk-
dk-vk-
dk-vk-
dk-vk- 1535-—dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slk izrhr gksrk gS fd yksd fgr esa ;g vko”;d gS fd iVuk ls eksfrgkjh vkSj
csrkyiqj rd isVªksfy;e inkFkksZ ds ifjogu gsrq ftyk floku] jkT; fcgkj esa bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs”ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbiykbu fcNkbZ
tkuh pkfg,(
vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slh ikbiykbu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, vko”;d izrhr gksrk gS fd ml Hkwfe esa ftlds Hkhrj
mDr ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkus dk izLrko gS vkSj tks bl vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa of.kZr gS] mi;ksx dk vtZu fd;k tk,(
vr% vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbUl ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½ vf/kfu;e] 1962 ¼1962
dk 50½ dh /kkjk 3 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk iznÙk “kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] mDr Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/akdkj dk vtZu djus ds
vius vk”k; dh ?kks’k.kk djrh gS A
dksbZ O;fDr] tks mDr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa fgrc) gS] ml rkjh[k ls ftldks] Hkkjr ds jkti= esa ;Fkk izdkf”kr bl
vf/klwpuk dh izfr;ka lk/kkj.k turk dks miyC/k djk nh tkrh gS] bDdhl fnu ds vUnj] Hkwfe ds Hkhrj ikbiykbu fcNk, tkus gsrq
mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj ds vtZu ds fy,] Jh v:.k dqekj >k] fc-iz-ls- o l{ke izkf/kdkjh bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs”ku fyfeVsM ¼ikbiykbu
fMohtu½ iVuk] iks-vks- <syok] flikjk] ftyk iVuk] fiu% 800020] fcgkj dks fyf[kr :i eas vk{ksi Hkst ldsxkA
vuqlwph
ftyk % floku
jkT; % fcgkj
ekStk@xzke
losZ@Cykd@la- (IykWV la-)
lc&Mho&la-
{ks=kiQy
gsDVs;j
vkjs
oxZ ehVj
1
2
3
4
5
6
tykyiwj
tykyiwj
tykyiwj
tykyiwj
tykyiwj
2232&ukyk
2232&ukyk
2232&ukyk
2232&ukyk
2232&ukyk
00
00
00
00
00
10
10
10
10
10
72
72
72
72
72
Fkkuk uacj&236
Fkkuk uacj&236
Fkkuk uacj&236
Fkkuk uacj&236
Fkkuk uacj&236
2233&ukyk
2233&ukyk
2233&ukyk
2233&ukyk
2233&ukyk
00
00
00
00
00
01
01
01
01
01
08
08
08
08
08
2238
00
01
65
2239
00
13
27
2240
00
00
20
2242
00
05
00
2247
00
04
91
2248
00
03
49
2258
00
10
30
2257
00
12
90
2256
00
01
43
2300
00
12
27
2299
00
09
48
2304
00
06
08
2305
00
03
99
2306
00
00
20
2307
00
01
10
2308
00
02
37
2309
00
03
25
2314
00
01
14
2315
00
10
68
2316
00
06
12
2233&ukyk
2233&ukyk
2233&ukyk
2233&ukyk
2233&ukyk
00
00
00
00
00
01
01
01
01
01
46
46
46
46
46
2226&ukyk
2226&ukyk
2226&ukyk
2226&ukyk
2226&ukyk
00
00
00
00
00
03
03
03
03
03
80
80
80
80
80
3862
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3863
2225&ukyk
2225&ukyk
2225&ukyk
2225&ukyk
2225&ukyk
00
00
00
00
00
07
07
07
07
07
35
35
35
35
35
1075¼dsuky½
1075¼dsuky½
1075¼dsuky½
1075¼dsuky½
1075¼dsuky½
00
00
00
00
00
01
01
01
01
01
78
78
78
78
78
1074¼dsuky½
1074¼dsuky½
1074¼dsuky½
1074¼dsuky½
1074¼dsuky½
00
00
00
00
00
01
01
01
01
01
16
16
16
16
16
1073¼dsuky½
1073¼dsuky½
1073¼dsuky½
1073¼dsuky½
1073¼dsuky½
00
00
00
00
00
02
02
02
02
02
38
38
38
38
38
988
00
00
20
987
00
02
30
986
00
06
94
986@9306
00
05
11
815
00
00
20
814
00
00
20
985
00
04
57
817
00
02
44
818
00
04
10
822
00
07
85
820
00
00
20
821
00
00
20
836
00
00
20
833@9307
00
06
69
833
00
04
03
834
00
10
18
775
00
00
20
777
00
05
89
786
00
05
18
787
00
00
20
778
00
02
35
779
00
03
87
785
00
04
48
784
00
01
60
735
00
00
20
780
00
00
26
781
00
03
07
782
00
01
49
783
00
00
20
738
00
01
63
739
00
00
20
737
00
07
25
744
00
02
19
745
00
00
20
743
00
00
75
748
00
09
69
749
00
00
95
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3864
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
429¼jkLrk½
429¼jkLrk½
429¼jkLrk½
429¼jkLrk½
429¼jkLrk½
00
00
00
00
00
01
01
01
01
01
18
18
18
18
18
311
00
13
18
310
00
00
20
313
00
02
39
328
00
05
21
324
00
04
87
325
00
02
08
327
00
00
20
273
00
07
93
274
00
00
20
326
00
00
35
267
00
00
20
269
00
08
14
268
00
05
04
259
00
00
20
251
00
01
19
252
00
01
76
253
00
01
97
256
00
00
76
254
00
02
58
255
00
09
28
239
00
00
20
244
00
00
20
243
00
00
78
245
00
00
20
242
00
02
86
241
00
03
54
236
00
01
60
3457
00
02
00
235
00
00
34
233
00
00
20
234
00
00
20
3458
00
10
47
enkjhpd
enkjhpd
enkjhpd
enkjhpd
enkjhpd
919&ukyk
919&ukyk
919&ukyk
919&ukyk
919&ukyk
00
00
00
00
00
02
02
02
02
02
80
80
80
80
80
Fkkuk uacj&235
Fkkuk uacj&235
Fkkuk uacj&235
Fkkuk uacj&235
Fkkuk uacj&235
920&ukyk
920&ukyk
920&ukyk
920&ukyk
920&ukyk
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
20
20
20
20
20
918&ukyk
918&ukyk
918&ukyk
918&ukyk
918&ukyk
00
00
00
00
00
05
05
05
05
05
09
09
09
09
09
906&ukyk
906&ukyk
906&ukyk
906&ukyk
906&ukyk
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
88
88
88
88
88
917
00
00
71
907
00
03
08
908
00
04
73
911
00
00
31
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3865
904
00
00
51
909
00
01
54
903
00
06
49
900
00
03
83
902
00
00
20
901
00
00
20
899
00
04
20
898
00
00
20
895
00
06
34
882
00
01
28
881
00
01
08
880
00
02
40
874
00
09
91
869&jkLrk
869&jkLrk
869&jkLrk
869&jkLrk
869&jkLrk
00
00
00
00
00
01
01
01
01
01
11
11
11
11
11
750&jkLrk
750&jkLrk
750&jkLrk
750&jkLrk
750&jkLrk
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
20
20
20
20
20
748
00
00
20
875
00
00
20
810
00
00
20
751
00
04
31
803
00
01
27
802
00
01
08
801
00
00
20
804
00
00
89
805
00
04
29
806
00
04
31
797&ukyk
797&ukyk
797&ukyk
797&ukyk
797&ukyk
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
40
40
40
40
40
791
00
00
20
807
00
00
89
808&ukyk
808&ukyk
808&ukyk
808&ukyk
808&ukyk
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
20
20
20
20
20
795&ukyk
795&ukyk
795&ukyk
795&ukyk
795&ukyk
00
00
00
00
00
01
01
01
01
01
09
09
09
09
09
796&ukyk
796&ukyk
796&ukyk
796&ukyk
796&ukyk
00
00
00
00
00
01
01
01
01
01
04
04
04
04
04
792
00
00
20
793
00
00
66
794&ukyk
794&ukyk
794&ukyk
794&ukyk
794&ukyk
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
20
20
20
20
20
779
00
02
62
778
00
02
31
777
00
02
30
774
00
05
87
775
00
00
35
773@1191
00
00
20
773
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3866
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
772
00
00
20
cxkSjk
cxkSjk
cxkSjk
cxkSjk
cxkSjk
5674
00
06
41
Fkkuk uacj&234
Fkkuk uacj&234
Fkkuk uacj&234
Fkkuk uacj&234
Fkkuk uacj&234
5675
00
05
80
5676
00
00
80
5677
00
03
09
5680
00
05
82
5681
00
02
01
5682
00
03
01
5717
00
04
82
5715
00
06
42
5714
00
02
13
5691
00
01
78
5692
00
00
93
5693
00
02
68
5694
00
02
83
5695
00
02
31
5696
00
02
36
5699
00
02
22
5700
00
01
80
5701
00
04
95
1472
00
02
29
1471
00
00
76
1470
00
02
19
1405
00
05
53
1404
00
08
68
1407
00
01
86
1409
00
04
62
1408
00
00
20
1413
00
02
45
1414
00
03
70
1417
00
01
96
1419
00
02
19
1420
00
08
35
1385
00
00
20
1124
00
14
70
1115
00
00
36
1116
00
15
55
721
00
05
63
720
00
05
51
719
00
05
94
718
00
04
14
634
00
02
44
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3867
656
00
00
20
657
00
10
50
633
00
00
20
649
00
01
72
648
00
20
71
640
00
05
72
639
00
00
20
641
00
01
65
642
00
01
01
643
00
03
79
106
00
07
38
107
00
00
20
108
00
00
20
105
00
00
46
104
00
03
19
109
00
04
06
103
00
05
17
110
00
02
85
111 jkLrk
jkLrk
jkLrk
jkLrk
jkLrk
00
01
42
112
00
00
48
145
00
05
12
113
00
04
12
143
00
08
85
142
00
06
27
140
00
00
20
141
00
05
11
139
00
07
13
134
00
00
20
138
00
06
18
deljk
deljk
deljk
deljk
deljk
1387
00
02
56
Fkkuk uacj&232
Fkkuk uacj&232
Fkkuk uacj&232
Fkkuk uacj&232
Fkkuk uacj&232
1386
00
00
79
1400
00
04
08
1399
00
08
75
1401
00
05
94
1402
00
09
03
1398&dPpk jkLrk
1398&dPpk jkLrk
1398&dPpk jkLrk
1398&dPpk jkLrk
1398&dPpk jkLrk
00
00
00
00
00
01
01
01
01
01
67
67
67
67
67
1394
00
00
20
1395
00
00
20
1403
00
21
08
1404
00
00
72
1127
00
00
90
35 ¼vsu-vsp-&85½
35 ¼vsu-vsp-&85½
35 ¼vsu-vsp-&85½
35 ¼vsu-vsp-&85½
35 ¼vsu-vsp-&85½
00
00
00
00
00
04
04
04
04
04
41
41
41
41
41
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3868
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
741
00
01
17
1407
00
00
44
740
00
01
94
731
00
00
20
739
00
03
91
738
00
01
22
1403
00
02
12
1398
00
01
41
1394
00
11
53
1393
00
05
22
1392
00
01
19
1376
00
08
16
1377
00
02
12
1375
00
07
45
1374
00
00
73
1372
00
07
13
1371
00
04
10
1370
00
04
10
1369
00
04
58
1132
00
00
20
1368
00
00
42
1365
00
08
37
1364
00
06
14
1133
00
00
10
1134
00
00
80
1363
00
03
43
1136
00
03
69
1135
00
00
20
1137
00
04
85
1138
00
00
20
1150&jkLrk
1150&jkLrk
1150&jkLrk
1150&jkLrk
1150&jkLrk
00
00
00
00
00
01
01
01
01
01
34
34
34
34
34
1153
00
02
85
1152
00
02
15
1337
00
34
03
1158
00
00
20
1331
00
21
26
1330
00
06
55
1328
00
00
92
1327
00
00
20
739
00
00
70
738
00
04
91
737
00
02
48
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3869
736
00
00
20
733
00
00
77
734
00
07
89
735
00
06
07
732
00
00
20
274&jsyos
274&jsyos
274&jsyos
274&jsyos
274&jsyos
00
00
00
00
00
09
09
09
09
09
85
85
85
85
85
722
00
14
80
721
00
22
14
720
00
00
11
691
00
01
55
690 ¼jkLrk½
690 ¼jkLrk½
690 ¼jkLrk½
690 ¼jkLrk½
690 ¼jkLrk½
00
00
00
00
00
01
01
01
01
01
23
23
23
23
23
689 ¼ukyk½
689 ¼ukyk½
689 ¼ukyk½
689 ¼ukyk½
689 ¼ukyk½
00
00
00
00
00
02
02
02
02
02
35
35
35
35
35
cyqgh
cyqgh
cyqgh
cyqgh
cyqgh
296
00
02
06
Fkkuk uacj&233
Fkkuk uacj&233
Fkkuk uacj&233
Fkkuk uacj&233
Fkkuk uacj&233
207
00
07
28
207@322
00
09
01
206
00
02
77
205
00
02
75
204
00
01
99
208 ¼ugj½
208 ¼ugj½
208 ¼ugj½
208 ¼ugj½
208 ¼ugj½
00
00
00
00
00
01
01
01
01
01
26
26
26
26
26
203
00
00
20
319
00
12
24
320
00
00
20
317
00
00
29
316
00
08
75
199
00
04
30
198
00
00
45
108 ¼ugj½
108 ¼ugj½
108 ¼ugj½
108 ¼ugj½
108 ¼ugj½
00
00
00
00
00
01
01
01
01
01
74
74
74
74
74
150
00
04
09
149
00
03
74
154
00
07
49
156
00
07
11
155
00
00
62
157
00
08
02
111
00
10
66
110
00
03
96
112
00
00
20
109
00
14
12
103¼dPpk jkLrk½
103¼dPpk jkLrk½
103¼dPpk jkLrk½
103¼dPpk jkLrk½
103¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
00
00
00
00
02
02
02
02
02
52
52
52
52
52
102
00
05
70
101
00
03
64
100@299
00
03
60
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3870
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
87
00
12
03
96
00
07
02
309
00
05
58
305
00
00
57
94
00
00
20
95
00
12
61
304
00
00
20
94@326
00
13
74
93
00
10
31
1¼ugj½
1¼ugj½
1¼ugj½
1¼ugj½
1¼ugj½
00
00
00
00
00
01
01
01
01
01
38
38
38
38
38
ckyMhg
ckyMhg
ckyMhg
ckyMhg
ckyMhg
76
00
08
18
Fkkuk uacj&183
Fkkuk uacj&183
Fkkuk uacj&183
Fkkuk uacj&183
Fkkuk uacj&183
77
00
00
20
75
00
00
20
78
00
00
20
79
00
02
08
80
00
00
20
90
00
09
66
91
00
00
46
74¼dPpk jkLrk½
74¼dPpk jkLrk½
74¼dPpk jkLrk½
74¼dPpk jkLrk½
74¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
00
00
00
00
01
01
01
01
01
29
29
29
29
29
56
00
02
82
55
00
08
97
54
00
00
20
53
00
00
73
51
00
00
20
97
00
09
42
96
00
03
23
95
00
01
38
94
00
00
20
98
00
06
69
99
00
04
22
101
00
00
20
100
00
07
38
102
00
00
22
103
00
11
25
jkuhckjh
jkuhckjh
jkuhckjh
jkuhckjh
jkuhckjh
339
00
00
91
Fkkuk uacj&182
Fkkuk uacj&182
Fkkuk uacj&182
Fkkuk uacj&182
Fkkuk uacj&182
355
00
17
74
347
00
00
20
346
00
00
20
348
00
05
23
349
00
09
61
351
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3871
350
00
05
28
301
00
00
20
352
00
03
91
353
00
00
20
290
00
00
20
289
00
03
66
288
00
10
92
287
00
06
61
264
00
00
20
266
00
05
99
271
00
04
08
282
00
00
20
270
00
00
20
273
00
02
42
272
00
07
42
223
00
00
20
275
00
01
07
274
00
04
01
222
00
00
20
221
00
02
55
220
00
06
37
cSnkiqj
cSnkiqj
cSnkiqj
cSnkiqj
cSnkiqj
588
00
00
52
Fkkuk uacj&184
Fkkuk uacj&184
Fkkuk uacj&184
Fkkuk uacj&184
Fkkuk uacj&184
585
00
00
20
589
00
14
44
593
00
00
20
590
00
08
49
591
00
04
82
592
00
04
07
602
00
02
48
603
00
00
90
604
00
00
20
605
00
00
20
965¼jkLrk½
965¼jkLrk½
965¼jkLrk½
965¼jkLrk½
965¼jkLrk½
00
00
00
00
00
03
03
03
03
03
77
77
77
77
77
966
00
00
20
964
00
06
31
963
00
15
05
956
00
00
20
962
00
07
08
959
00
00
20
961
00
05
98
960
00
01
11
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3872
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
819
00
05
45
820
00
02
51
821
00
02
31
823
00
01
73
824
00
01
86
825
00
02
08
828
00
01
33
831
00
01
14
832
00
01
04
827
00
01
44
835
00
01
39
836
00
02
44
837
00
03
45
838
00
04
95
839
00
01
10
840
00
00
93
841
00
01
05
fc'kwuiqjk
fc'kwuiqjk
fc'kwuiqjk
fc'kwuiqjk
fc'kwuiqjk
1538
00
01
85
Fkkuk uacj&165
Fkkuk uacj&165
Fkkuk uacj&165
Fkkuk uacj&165
Fkkuk uacj&165
1537
00
00
20
1536
00
00
20
1535
00
00
20
1534
00
00
20
1539
00
02
07
1540
00
02
15
1541
00
03
83
1542
00
03
22
1547
00
00
20
1543
00
10
58
1546
00
03
00
1532
00
00
90
1544
00
02
24
1545
00
00
20
1640¼jkLrk½
1640¼jkLrk½
1640¼jkLrk½
1640¼jkLrk½
1640¼jkLrk½
00
00
00
00
00
02
02
02
02
02
19
19
19
19
19
758
00
06
85
764
00
02
94
759
00
03
56
760
00
01
84
761
00
03
59
762
00
00
20
719
00
07
06
748
00
01
18
720
00
01
10
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3873
718
00
00
51
721
00
01
26
722
00
07
15
730
00
00
95
729
00
00
20
731
00
03
94
732
00
00
41
735
00
02
26
735
00
02
00
736
00
03
35
740
00
00
20
739
00
00
20
656
00
00
20
738
00
08
20
688
00
04
14
687
00
03
61
686
00
02
83
685
00
02
97
661
00
04
89
662
00
03
27
666
00
03
26
667
00
02
67
641
00
02
27
639
00
02
32
640
00
02
25
275
00
02
40
434
00
04
17
433
00
01
00
432
00
02
95
431
00
01
51
430
00
00
83
429
00
02
64
428
00
02
74
427
00
05
35
424
00
01
29
289
00
00
20
425
00
03
03
426
00
00
20
422
00
00
20
423
00
10
14
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3874
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
283
00
00
20
403
00
01
05
402
00
05
14
399@1641
00
06
37
398
00
01
09
397
00
02
16
385
00
02
43
386
00
02
77
387
00
00
35
307¼jkLrk½
307¼jkLrk½
307¼jkLrk½
307¼jkLrk½
307¼jkLrk½
00
00
00
00
00
01
01
01
01
01
13
13
13
13
13
374
00
00
20
372
00
00
20
378
00
01
27
379
00
04
08
380
00
03
91
381
00
01
02
382
00
00
20
373
00
09
16
369
00
09
64
368
00
04
39
367
00
02
46
366
00
02
78
365
00
04
61
364
00
08
47
363
00
02
47
336
00
05
74
362
00
05
87
337
00
03
62
361
00
01
22
359
00
03
27
358
00
00
20
356
00
00
20
351
00
00
20
360
00
01
17
355
00
02
39
352
00
02
22
350
00
10
88
349
00
01
61
#dqUnhiwj
#dqUnhiwj
#dqUnhiwj
#dqUnhiwj
#dqUnhiwj
1635&jkLrk
1635&jkLrk
1635&jkLrk
1635&jkLrk
1635&jkLrk
00
00
00
00
00
01
01
01
01
01
60
60
60
60
60
Fkkuk uacj&168
Fkkuk uacj&168
Fkkuk uacj&168
Fkkuk uacj&168
Fkkuk uacj&168
1634
00
02
53
1630
00
00
64
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3875
1629
00
02
34
1636
00
00
20
1628
00
02
85
1627
00
01
48
1637
00
00
40
1625
00
03
73
1626
00
01
09
1621
00
00
20
1622
00
06
60
1619
00
02
97
1615
00
00
20
1616
00
03
09
1613
00
03
50
1611
00
03
65
1609
00
02
80
1588
00
02
55
1589
00
02
58
1594
00
00
20
1593
00
01
45
1596
00
00
20
1592
00
00
20
1595
00
01
65
1599
00
01
76
1598
00
00
35
1575
00
02
22
1572
00
03
06
1571
00
04
71
1569
00
00
43
1508
00
00
20
1570
00
02
00
1567
00
03
35
1566
00
01
67
1565
00
01
13
1564
00
00
63
1512
00
00
20
1513
00
03
97
1561
00
00
20
1562
00
00
20
1514
00
03
78
1515
00
03
39
1534
00
05
63
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3876
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1516
00
02
02
1517
00
04
00
1518
00
00
82
1519
00
04
92
1520
00
00
26
1526
00
04
08
1528
00
01
66
1625
00
04
47
1637
00
00
48
1527
00
05
74
1409
00
08
88
1445
00
00
69
1446
00
00
20
1444
00
00
20
1410
00
04
67
1412
00
03
26
1411
00
00
71
1413
00
05
31
1414
00
01
73
1254
00
03
96
1230
00
00
20
1255
00
00
80
1257
00
00
20
1258
00
00
20
1253
00
00
45
1249
00
01
91
1248
00
02
14
1247
00
02
61
1246
00
03
32
1245
00
04
31
1244
00
00
20
1242
00
08
30
1243
00
04
37
1220&dsuky
1220&dsuky
1220&dsuky
1220&dsuky
1220&dsuky
00
00
00
00
00
03
03
03
03
03
17
17
17
17
17
1211
00
00
20
1209
00
02
02
1212
00
05
00
1214
00
00
35
1213
00
02
01
1215
00
00
47
1216
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3877
1207
00
03
81
1208
00
01
78
1206
00
03
87
1205
00
00
20
1201
00
00
65
1203
00
00
20
1204
00
07
19
999
00
00
20
360
00
02
08
358
00
00
20
361
00
07
48
362
00
00
41
359
00
02
22
367
00
10
39
356
00
06
07
355
00
17
21
354
00
01
64
516
00
10
17
517
00
00
20
518
00
00
89
507
00
06
56
520
00
04
21
519
00
04
00
521
00
02
33
506
00
00
20
529
00
00
20
530
00
00
20
528
00
02
89
527
00
02
58
526
00
05
14
577
00
06
61
576
00
00
20
578
00
03
65
579
00
02
31
574
00
00
78
573
00
00
89
572
00
06
19
571
00
00
20
561
00
03
35
570
00
00
43
569
00
02
21
562
00
01
88
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3878
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
567
00
05
70
565
00
00
20
566
00
06
29
txnh'kiqj
txnh'kiqj
txnh'kiqj
txnh'kiqj
txnh'kiqj
597
00
00
99
Fkkuk uacj&160
Fkkuk uacj&160
Fkkuk uacj&160
Fkkuk uacj&160
Fkkuk uacj&160
598
00
00
20
599
00
00
20
603
00
02
70
602
00
04
44
601
00
02
29
600
00
01
73
612
00
00
20
593
00
06
17
592
00
02
21
591
00
00
89
587
00
00
20
613
00
08
24
614
00
10
45
616
00
04
22
617
00
02
62
618
00
01
87
619
00
02
89
625
00
03
84
620
00
00
92
624
00
04
24
621
00
00
20
626
00
00
32
623
00
03
51
548
00
04
56
547
00
08
18
549
00
00
20
551
00
03
03
546
00
12
65
655
00
00
20
665
00
00
20
657
00
00
96
659
00
02
75
545
00
00
53
544
00
00
69
543
00
00
20
660
00
04
34
661
00
04
64
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3879
663
00
00
20
662
00
00
20
671
00
02
12
672
00
00
20
676
00
01
80
675
00
01
79
670
00
00
20
674
00
03
83
677
00
00
20
678
00
00
97
679
00
04
66
681
00
01
28
680
00
00
20
740¼jkLrk½
740¼jkLrk½
740¼jkLrk½
740¼jkLrk½
740¼jkLrk½
00
00
00
00
00
02
02
02
02
02
90
90
90
90
90
1005
00
00
27
1004
00
00
20
1003
00
03
17
875
00
00
65
974
00
00
20
876
00
04
93
1002
00
04
12
997
00
01
89
878
00
00
20
988
00
05
14
995
00
00
20
1001
00
09
62
999
00
00
80
991
00
07
89
970
00
02
82
990
00
00
53
969
00
01
72
971
00
04
59
910
00
01
74
911
00
00
20
909
00
02
00
908
00
03
79
907
00
02
68
906
00
07
23
905
00
08
59
903
00
03
85
902
00
01
41
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3880
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ckaxjk
ckaxjk
ckaxjk
ckaxjk
ckaxjk
3581
00
05
95
Fkkuk uacj 156
Fkkuk uacj 156
Fkkuk uacj 156
Fkkuk uacj 156
Fkkuk uacj 156
3582
00
02
85
3583
00
00
20
3578¼jkLrk½
¼jkLrk½
¼jkLrk½
¼jkLrk½
¼jkLrk½
00
02
03
3003
00
00
60
3002
00
00
20
3004
00
10
74
3005
00
00
20
3006
00
02
85
3007
00
05
71
3008
00
07
79
3010
00
00
20
3014
00
01
53
3013
00
00
20
3015
00
02
62
3048
00
00
20
3047
00
00
20
3048
00
00
20
3046
00
00
60
3045
00
01
32
3016
00
01
58
3044
00
04
42
3018
00
00
20
3043
00
10
43
3042
00
05
02
3041
00
00
48
3040
00
02
80
3031
00
02
61
3036
00
00
66
3034
00
00
20
3035
00
05
07
3095¼jkLrk½
¼jkLrk½
¼jkLrk½
¼jkLrk½
¼jkLrk½
00
01
08
3099
00
03
79
3098
00
00
20
3100
00
00
33
3101
00
04
84
3102
00
01
30
3164
00
04
26
3103
00
00
20
3104
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3881
3163
00
02
92
3172
00
03
14
3171
00
01
51
3173
00
05
91
3180
00
00
20
3174
00
02
10
3175
00
00
20
3177
00
01
74
3176
00
07
24
3157
00
00
20
3156
00
04
26
3155
00
08
28
3154
00
02
45
3188
00
00
69
3189
00
10
69
3190
00
00
20
3204¼jkLrk½
¼jkLrk½
¼jkLrk½
¼jkLrk½
¼jkLrk½
00
01
92
3220
00
01
60
3219
00
04
35
3215
00
09
24
3214
00
00
20
3217
00
00
20
3216
00
03
26
3223
00
00
20
3213
00
00
82
3212
00
00
20
3211
00
00
20
3224
00
08
82
3208
00
08
19
3235
00
00
32
3207
00
03
00
3236
00
03
88
2489
00
00
36
3642
00
01
79
2488
00
14
85
2487
00
00
20
2493¼jkLrk½
¼jkLrk½
¼jkLrk½
¼jkLrk½
¼jkLrk½
00
01
98
2503
00
22
41
2505
00
00
20
2501
00
07
77
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3882
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2509
00
02
74
2510
00
01
89
2513
00
00
20
2498
00
09
62
2497
00
00
20
2463¼jkLrk½
¼jkLrk½
¼jkLrk½
¼jkLrk½
¼jkLrk½
00
03
20
2404
00
00
20
2408
00
02
46
2409
00
04
69
2410
00
06
16
2458
00
00
20
2457
00
06
01
2459
00
05
14
2460
00
04
51
2461
00
01
38
2452
00
05
39
2453
00
03
63
2454
00
00
20
2455
00
00
20
2446@3640
00
00
63
2447
00
00
60
2446
00
08
55
2419
00
00
20
2445
00
02
78
2420
00
02
02
2421
00
08
53
2423
00
00
20
2422
00
07
96
2424
00
04
95
2195
00
00
20
2425
00
01
51
2186
00
00
20
2187
00
04
84
2188
00
07
30
2189
00
03
59
3236@3642
00
00
20
2181¼jkLrk½
¼jkLrk½
¼jkLrk½
¼jkLrk½
¼jkLrk½
00
01
19
2151
00
03
49
2180
00
00
20
2150
00
02
16
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3883
2149
00
00
20
2152
00
06
09
2153
00
05
80
2154
00
09
32
2147
00
00
20
2155
00
04
72
2157
00
00
20
2156
00
00
20
¹iQk- la- vkj&25011@14@2013&vksvkj&Iº
iou oqQekj] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 27th July, 2013
S.O. 1535.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest
that a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited in Dist. Siwan in the State of Bihar for ‘Patna
to Motihari and Baitalpur Pipeline’ for the transportation of Petroleum Product;
And, whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is
necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which
is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and
Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby
declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the
date on which the copies of the notification issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as
published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of
the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land, to Shri Arun Kumar Jha B.A.S. & Competent
Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited. (Pipelines Division) P.O. Dhelwan, Sipara, Dist. Patna (Bihar.) Pin –
800020.
SCHEDULE
Dist.: Siwan
State : Bihar
Mouja / Village
Survey/BlockNo.
Sub-Div-No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
JALALPUR
2232-Nala
00
10
72
Thana No-236
2233-Nala
00
01
08
2238
00
01
65
2239
00
13
27
2240
00
00
20
2242
00
05
00
2247
00
04
91
2248
00
03
49
2258
00
10
30
2257
00
12
90
2256
00
01
43
2300
00
12
27
2299
00
09
48
2304
00
06
08
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3884
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2305
00
03
99
2306
00
00
20
2307
00
01
10
2308
00
02
37
2309
00
03
25
2314
00
01
14
2315
00
10
68
2316
00
06
12
2233-Nala
00
01
46
2226-Nala
00
03
80
2225-Nala
00
07
35
1075(CANAL)
00
01
78
1074(CANAL)
00
01
16
1073(CANAL)
00
02
38
988
00
00
20
987
00
02
30
986
00
06
94
986/9306
00
05
11
815
00
00
20
814
00
00
20
985
00
04
57
817
00
02
44
818
00
04
10
822
00
07
85
820
00
00
20
821
00
00
20
836
00
00
20
833/9307
00
06
69
833
00
04
03
834
00
10
18
775
00
00
20
777
00
05
89
786
00
05
18
787
00
00
20
778
00
02
35
779
00
03
87
785
00
04
48
784
00
01
60
735
00
00
20
780
00
00
26
781
00
03
07
782
00
01
49
783
00
00
20
738
00
01
63
739
00
00
20
737
00
07
25
744
00
02
19
745
00
00
20
743
00
00
75
748
00
09
69
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3885
749
00
00
95
429(ROAD)
00
01
18
311
00
13
18
310
00
00
20
313
00
02
39
328
00
05
21
324
00
04
87
325
00
02
08
327
00
00
20
273
00
07
93
274
00
00
20
326
00
00
35
267
00
00
20
269
00
08
14
268
00
05
04
259
00
00
20
251
00
01
19
252
00
01
76
253
00
01
97
256
00
00
76
254
00
02
58
255
00
09
28
239
00
00
20
244
00
00
20
243
00
00
78
245
00
00
20
242
00
02
86
241
00
03
54
236
00
01
60
3457
00
02
00
235
00
00
34
233
00
00
20
234
00
00
20
3458
00
10
47
MADARICHAK
919-Nala
00
02
80
Thana No-235
920-Nala
00
00
20
918-Nala
00
05
09
906-Nala
00
00
88
917
00
00
71
907
00
03
08
908
00
04
73
911
00
00
31
904
00
00
51
909
00
01
54
903
00
06
49
900
00
03
83
902
00
00
20
901
00
00
20
899
00
04
20
898
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3886
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
895
00
06
34
882
00
01
28
881
00
01
08
880
00
02
40
874
00
09
91
869-Brick Road
00
01
11
750-Brick Road
00
00
20
748
00
00
20
875
00
00
20
810
00
00
20
751
00
04
31
803
00
01
27
802
00
01
08
801
00
00
20
804
00
00
89
805
00
04
29
806
00
04
31
797-Nala
00
00
40
791
00
00
20
807
00
00
89
808-Nala
00
00
20
795-Nala
00
01
09
796-Nala
00
01
04
792
00
00
20
793
00
00
66
794-Nala
00
00
20
779
00
02
62
778
00
02
31
777
00
02
30
774
00
05
87
775
00
00
35
773/1191
00
00
00
773
00
00
00
772
00
00
20
BAGAURA
5674
00
06
41
Thana No-234
5675
00
05
80
5676
00
00
80
5677
00
03
09
5680
00
05
82
5681
00
02
01
5682
00
03
01
5717
00
04
82
5715
00
06
42
5714
00
02
13
5691
00
01
78
5692
00
00
93
5693
00
02
68
5694
00
02
83
5695
00
02
31
5696
00
02
36
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3887
5699
00
02
22
5700
00
01
80
5701
00
04
95
1472
00
02
29
1471
00
00
76
1470
00
02
19
1405
00
05
53
1404
00
08
68
1407
00
01
86
1409
00
04
62
1408
00
00
20
1413
00
02
45
1414
00
03
70
1417
00
01
96
1419
00
02
19
1420
00
08
35
1385
00
00
20
1124
00
14
70
1115
00
00
36
1116
00
15
55
721
00
05
63
720
00
05
51
719
00
05
94
718
00
04
14
634
00
02
44
656
00
00
20
657
00
10
50
633
00
00
20
649
00
01
72
648
00
20
71
640
00
05
72
639
00
00
20
641
00
01
65
642
00
01
01
643
00
03
79
106
00
07
38
107
00
00
20
108
00
00
20
105
00
00
46
104
00
03
19
109
00
04
06
103
00
05
17
110
00
02
85
111 (Road)
00
01
42
112
00
00
48
145
00
05
12
113
00
04
12
143
00
08
85
142
00
06
27
140
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3888
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
141
00
05
11
139
00
07
13
134
00
00
20
138
00
06
18
KAMSARA
1387
00
02
56
Thana No-232
1386
00
00
79
1400
00
04
08
1399
00
08
75
1401
00
05
94
1402
00
09
03
1398-Cart Track
00
01
67
1394
00
00
20
1395
00
00
20
1403
00
21
08
1404
00
00
72
1127
00
00
90
35-NH85
00
04
41
741
00
01
17
1407
00
00
44
740
00
01
94
731
00
00
20
739
00
03
91
738
00
01
22
1403
00
02
12
1398
00
01
41
1394
00
11
53
1393
00
05
22
1392
00
01
19
1376
00
08
16
1377
00
02
12
1375
00
07
45
1374
00
00
73
1372
00
07
13
1371
00
04
10
1370
00
04
10
1369
00
04
58
1132
00
00
20
1368
00
00
42
1365
00
08
37
1364
00
06
14
1133
00
00
10
1134
00
00
80
1363
00
03
43
1136
00
03
69
1135
00
00
20
1137
00
04
85
1138
00
00
20
1150-ROAD
00
01
34
1153
00
02
85
1152
00
02
15
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3889
1337
00
34
03
1158
00
00
20
1331
00
21
26
1330
00
06
55
1328
00
00
92
1327
00
00
20
739
00
00
70
738
00
04
91
737
00
02
48
736
00
00
20
733
00
00
77
734
00
07
89
735
00
06
07
732
00
00
20
274-Railway
00
09
85
722
00
14
80
721
00
22
14
720
00
00
11
691
00
01
55
690 (Road)
00
01
23
689 (Nala)
00
02
35
BALUHI
296
00
02
06
Thana No-233
207
00
07
28
207/322
00
09
01
206
00
02
77
205
00
02
75
204
00
01
99
208 (Unlined Canal)
00
01
26
203
00
00
20
319
00
12
24
320
00
00
20
317
00
00
29
316
00
08
75
199
00
04
30
198
00
00
45
108 (Unlined Canal)
00
01
74
150
00
04
09
149
00
03
74
154
00
07
49
156
00
07
11
155
00
00
62
157
00
08
02
111
00
10
66
110
00
03
96
112
00
00
20
109
00
14
12
103 (CART TRACK)
00
02
52
102
00
05
70
101
00
03
64
100/299
00
03
60
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3890
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
87
00
12
03
96
00
07
02
309
00
05
58
305
00
00
57
94
00
00
20
95
00
12
61
304
00
00
20
94/326
00
13
74
93
00
10
31
1 (Unlined Canal)
00
01
38
BALDIH
76
00
08
18
Thana No-183
77
00
00
20
75
00
00
20
78
00
00
20
79
00
02
08
80
00
00
20
90
00
09
66
91
00
00
46
74 (CART TRACK)
00
01
29
56
00
02
82
55
00
08
97
54
00
00
20
53
00
00
73
51
00
00
20
97
00
09
42
96
00
03
23
95
00
01
38
94
00
00
20
98
00
06
69
99
00
04
22
101
00
00
20
100
00
07
38
102
00
00
22
103
00
11
25
RANIBARI
339
00
00
91
Thana No-182
355
00
17
74
347
00
00
20
346
00
00
20
348
00
05
23
349
00
09
61
351
00
00
20
350
00
05
28
301
00
00
20
352
00
03
91
353
00
00
20
290
00
00
20
289
00
03
66
288
00
10
92
287
00
06
61
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3891
264
00
00
20
266
00
05
99
271
00
04
08
282
00
00
20
270
00
00
20
273
00
02
42
272
00
07
42
223
00
00
20
275
00
01
07
274
00
04
01
222
00
00
20
221
00
02
55
220
00
06
37
BAIDAPUR
588
00
00
52
Thana No-184
585
00
00
20
589
00
14
44
593
00
00
20
590
00
08
49
591
00
04
82
592
00
04
07
602
00
02
48
603
00
00
90
604
00
00
20
605
00
00
20
965 (ROAD)
00
03
77
966
00
00
20
964
00
06
31
963
00
15
05
956
00
00
20
962
00
07
08
959
00
00
20
961
00
05
98
960
00
01
11
819
00
05
45
820
00
02
51
821
00
02
31
823
00
01
73
824
00
01
86
825
00
02
08
828
00
01
33
831
00
01
14
832
00
01
04
827
00
01
44
835
00
01
39
836
00
02
44
837
00
03
45
838
00
04
95
839
00
01
10
840
00
00
93
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3892
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
841
00
01
05
BISHUNPURA
1538
00
01
85
Thana No-165
1537
00
00
20
1536
00
00
20
1535
00
00
20
1534
00
00
20
1539
00
02
07
1540
00
02
15
1541
00
03
83
1542
00
03
22
1547
00
00
20
1543
00
10
58
1546
00
03
00
1532
00
00
90
1544
00
02
24
1545
00
00
20
1640(ROAD)
00
02
19
758
00
06
85
764
00
02
94
759
00
03
56
760
00
01
84
761
00
03
59
762
00
00
20
719
00
07
06
748
00
01
18
720
00
01
10
718
00
00
51
721
00
01
26
722
00
07
15
730
00
00
95
729
00
00
20
731
00
03
94
732
00
00
41
735
00
02
26
735
00
02
00
736
00
03
35
740
00
00
20
739
00
00
20
656
00
00
20
738
00
08
20
688
00
04
14
687
00
03
61
686
00
02
83
685
00
02
97
661
00
04
89
662
00
03
27
666
00
03
26
667
00
02
67
641
00
02
27
639
00
02
32
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3893
640
00
02
25
275
00
02
40
434
00
04
17
433
00
01
00
432
00
02
95
431
00
01
51
430
00
00
83
429
00
02
64
428
00
02
74
427
00
05
35
424
00
01
29
289
00
00
20
425
00
03
03
426
00
00
20
422
00
00
20
423
00
10
14
283
00
00
20
403
00
01
05
402
00
05
14
399/1641
00
06
37
398
00
01
09
397
00
02
16
385
00
02
43
386
00
02
77
387
00
00
35
307(ROAD)
00
01
13
374
00
00
20
372
00
00
20
378
00
01
27
379
00
04
08
380
00
03
91
381
00
01
02
382
00
00
20
373
00
09
16
369
00
09
64
368
00
04
39
367
00
02
46
366
00
02
78
365
00
04
61
364
00
08
47
363
00
02
47
336
00
05
74
362
00
05
87
337
00
03
62
361
00
01
22
359
00
03
27
358
00
00
20
356
00
00
20
351
00
00
20
360
00
01
17
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3894
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
355
00
02
39
352
00
02
22
350
00
10
88
349
00
01
61
RUKUNDIPUR Thana No.-168
1635-Road
00
01
60
1634
00
02
53
1630
00
00
64
1629
00
02
34
1636
00
00
20
1628
00
02
85
1627
00
01
48
1637
00
00
40
1625
00
03
73
1626
00
01
09
1621
00
00
20
1622
00
06
60
1619
00
02
97
1615
00
00
20
1616
00
03
09
1613
00
03
50
1611
00
03
65
1609
00
02
80
1588
00
02
55
1589
00
02
58
1594
00
00
20
1593
00
01
45
1596
00
00
20
1592
00
00
20
1595
00
01
65
1599
00
01
76
1598
00
00
35
1575
00
02
22
1572
00
03
06
1571
00
04
71
1569
00
00
43
1508
00
00
20
1570
00
02
00
1567
00
03
35
1566
00
01
67
1565
00
01
13
1564
00
00
63
1512
00
00
20
1513
00
03
97
1561
00
00
20
1562
00
00
20
1514
00
03
78
1515
00
03
39
1534
00
05
63
1516
00
02
02
1517
00
04
00
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3895
1518
00
00
82
1519
00
04
92
1520
00
00
26
1526
00
04
08
1528
00
01
66
1625
00
04
47
1637
00
00
48
1527
00
05
74
1409
00
08
88
1445
00
00
69
1446
00
00
20
1444
00
00
20
1410
00
04
67
1412
00
03
26
1411
00
00
71
1413
00
05
31
1414
00
01
73
1254
00
03
96
1230
00
00
20
1255
00
00
80
1257
00
00
20
1258
00
00
20
1253
00
00
45
1249
00
01
91
1248
00
02
14
1247
00
02
61
1246
00
03
32
1245
00
04
31
1244
00
00
20
1242
00
08
30
1243
00
04
37
1220-canal
00
03
17
1211
00
00
20
1209
00
02
02
1212
00
05
00
1214
00
00
35
1213
00
02
01
1215
00
00
47
1216
00
00
20
1207
00
03
81
1208
00
01
78
1206
00
03
87
1205
00
00
20
1201
00
00
65
1203
00
00
20
1204
00
07
19
999
00
00
20
360
00
02
08
358
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3896
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
361
00
07
48
362
00
00
41
359
00
02
22
367
00
10
39
356
00
06
07
355
00
17
21
354
00
01
64
516
00
10
17
517
00
00
20
518
00
00
89
507
00
06
56
520
00
04
21
519
00
04
00
521
00
02
33
506
00
00
20
529
00
00
20
530
00
00
20
528
00
02
89
527
00
02
58
526
00
05
14
577
00
06
61
576
00
00
20
578
00
03
65
579
00
02
31
574
00
00
78
573
00
00
89
572
00
06
19
571
00
00
20
561
00
03
35
570
00
00
43
569
00
02
21
562
00
01
88
567
00
05
70
565
00
00
20
566
00
06
29
JAGDISHPUR
597
00
00
99
Thana No.-160
598
00
00
20
599
00
00
20
603
00
02
70
602
00
04
44
601
00
02
29
600
00
01
73
612
00
00
20
593
00
06
17
592
00
02
21
591
00
00
89
587
00
00
20
613
00
08
24
614
00
10
45
616
00
04
22
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3897
617
00
02
62
618
00
01
87
619
00
02
89
625
00
03
84
620
00
00
92
624
00
04
24
621
00
00
20
626
00
00
32
623
00
03
51
548
00
04
56
547
00
08
18
549
00
00
20
551
00
03
03
546
00
12
65
655
00
00
20
665
00
00
20
657
00
00
96
659
00
02
75
545
00
00
53
544
00
00
69
543
00
00
20
660
00
04
34
661
00
04
64
663
00
00
20
662
00
00
20
671
00
02
12
672
00
00
20
676
00
01
80
675
00
01
79
670
00
00
20
674
00
03
83
677
00
00
20
678
00
00
97
679
00
04
66
681
00
01
28
680
00
00
20
740(ROAD)
00
02
90
1005
00
00
27
1004
00
00
20
1003
00
03
17
875
00
00
65
974
00
00
20
876
00
04
93
1002
00
04
12
997
00
01
89
878
00
00
20
988
00
05
14
995
00
00
20
1001
00
09
62
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3898
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
999
00
00
80
991
00
07
89
970
00
02
82
990
00
00
53
969
00
01
72
971
00
04
59
910
00
01
74
911
00
00
20
909
00
02
00
908
00
03
79
907
00
02
68
906
00
07
23
905
00
08
59
903
00
03
85
902
00
01
41
BANGRA
3581
00
05
95
Thana No.-156
3582
00
02
85
3583
00
00
20
3578(ROAD)
00
02
03
3003
00
00
60
3002
00
00
20
3004
00
10
74
3005
00
00
20
3006
00
02
85
3007
00
05
71
3008
00
07
79
3010
00
00
20
3014
00
01
53
3013
00
00
20
3015
00
02
62
3048
00
00
20
3047
00
00
20
3048
00
00
20
3046
00
00
60
3045
00
01
32
3016
00
01
58
3044
00
04
42
3018
00
00
20
3043
00
10
43
3042
00
05
02
3041
00
00
48
3040
00
02
80
3031
00
02
61
3036
00
00
66
3034
00
00
20
3035
00
05
07
3095(ROAD)
00
01
08
3099
00
03
79
3098
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3899
3100
00
00
33
3101
00
04
84
3102
00
01
30
3164
00
04
26
3103
00
00
20
3104
00
00
20
3163
00
02
92
3172
00
03
14
3171
00
01
51
3173
00
05
91
3180
00
00
20
3174
00
02
10
3175
00
00
20
3177
00
01
74
3176
00
07
24
3157
00
00
20
3156
00
04
26
3155
00
08
28
3154
00
02
45
3188
00
00
69
3189
00
10
69
3190
00
00
20
3204(ROAD)
00
01
92
3220
00
01
60
3219
00
04
35
3215
00
09
24
3214
00
00
20
3217
00
00
20
3216
00
03
26
3223
00
00
20
3213
00
00
82
3212
00
00
20
3211
00
00
20
3224
00
08
82
3208
00
08
19
3235
00
00
32
3207
00
03
00
3236
00
03
88
2489
00
00
36
3642
00
01
79
2488
00
14
85
2487
00
00
20
2493(ROAD)
00
01
98
2503
00
22
41
2505
00
00
20
2501
00
07
77
2509
00
02
74
2510
00
01
89
2513
00
00
20
2498
00
09
62
2497
00
00
20
2463(ROAD)
00
03
20
2404
00
00
20
2408
00
02
46
2409
00
04
69
2410
00
06
16
2458
00
00
20
2457
00
06
01
2459
00
05
14
2460
00
04
51
2461
00
01
38
2452
00
05
39
2453
00
03
63
2454
00
00
20
2455
00
00
20
2446/3640
00
00
63
2447
00
00
60
2446
00
08
55
2419
00
00
20
2445
00
02
78
2420
00
02
02
2421
00
08
53
2423
00
00
20
2422
00
07
96
2424
00
04
95
2195
00
00
20
2425
00
01
51
2186
00
00
20
2187
00
04
84
2188
00
07
30
2189
00
03
59
3236/3642
00
00
20
2181(ROAD)
00
01
19
2151
00
03
49
2180
00
00
20
2150
00
02
16
2149
00
00
20
2152
00
06
09
2153
00
05
80
2154
00
09
32
2147
00
00
20
2155
00
04
72
2157
00
00
20
2156
00
00
20
[F. No. R-25011/14/2013-OR-I]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
3900
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
ubZ fnYyh] 27 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1536-—dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slk izrhr gksrk gS fd yksd fgr esa ;g vko';d gS fd iVuk ls eksfrgkjh vkSj csrkyiqj rd
isVªksfy;e inkFkks± ds ifjogu gsrq ftyk floku] jkT; fcgkj esa bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkuh pkfg, A
vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slh ikbiykbu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, vko';d izrhr gksrk gS fd ml Hkwfe esa ftlds Hkhrj mDr
ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkus dk izLrko gS vkSj tks bl vf/lwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa o£.kr gS] mi;ksx dk vtZu fd;k tk, A
vr% vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbUl (Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/dkj dk vtZu) vf/kfu;e] 1962 (1962
dk 50) dh /kkjk 3 dh mi&/kjk(1) }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] mDr Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/dkj dk vtZu djus ds vius
vk'k; dh ?kks"k.kk djrh gS A
dksbZ O;fDr] tks mDr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa fgrc¼ gS] ml rkjh[k ls ftldks] Hkkjr ds jkti=k esa ;Fkk izdkf'kr bl
vfèklwpuk dh izfr;ka lk/kj.k turk dks miyC/ djk nh tkrh gSa] bDdhl fnu ds vUnj] Hkwfe ds Hkhrj ikbiykbu fcNk, tkus gsrq mi;ksx
ds vf/dkj ds vtZu ds fy,] Jh v:.k dqekj >k] fc-iz-ls- o l{ke izkf/dkjh bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs”ku fyfeVsM] (ikbiykbu fMohtu)
iVuk] iks-vks- <syok] flikjk] ftyk iVuk] fiu% 800020] fcgkj dks fyf[kr :i eas vk{ksi Hkst ldsxk A
vuqlwph
ftyk % floku
jkT; % fcgkj
ekStk@xzke
losZ@Cykd@la- (IyksV la-)
lc&Mho&la-
{ks=kiQy
gsDVs;j
vkjs
oxZ ehVj
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
Hkh[kk cu
Hkh[kk cu
Hkh[kk cu
Hkh[kk cu
Hkh[kk cu
28
00
10
03
Fkkuk uacj&169
Fkkuk uacj&169
Fkkuk uacj&169
Fkkuk uacj&169
Fkkuk uacj&169
26
00
14
11
40
00
04
55
22 ¼jkLrk½
22 ¼jkLrk½
22 ¼jkLrk½
22 ¼jkLrk½
22 ¼jkLrk½
00
0000
0000
02
0202
0202
34
3434
3434
16
00
05
15
43
00
00
20
44
00
00
20
36
00
00
20
41
00
09
87
42
00
03
86
15
00
00
20
2331
00
01
38
2332 ¼unh½
2332 ¼unh½
2332 ¼unh½
2332 ¼unh½
2332 ¼unh½
00
0000
0000
03
0303
0303
57
5757
5757
nsmjh;k
nsmjh;k
nsmjh;k
nsmjh;k
nsmjh;k
381 ¼unh½
381 ¼unh½
381 ¼unh½
381 ¼unh½
381 ¼unh½
00
0000
0000
03
0303
0303
25
2525
2525
Fkkuk uacj&153
Fkkuk uacj&153
Fkkuk uacj&153
Fkkuk uacj&153
Fkkuk uacj&153
382 ¼jkLrk½
382 ¼jkLrk½
382 ¼jkLrk½
382 ¼jkLrk½
382 ¼jkLrk½
00
0000
0000
01
0101
0101
36
3636
3636
379 ¼jkLrk½
379 ¼jkLrk½
379 ¼jkLrk½
379 ¼jkLrk½
379 ¼jkLrk½
00
0000
0000
00
0000
0000
20
2020
2020
384
00
00
38
387
00
00
20
378
00
04
12
377
00
00
20
371
00
05
35
373
00
00
20
372
00
00
20
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3901
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3902
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
370
00
01
03
369
00
02
82
368
00
03
42
366
00
00
25
367
00
07
41
8
00
00
20
9
00
00
20
10
00
00
53
11
00
00
81
12
00
03
00
13
00
10
22
364
00
00
20
16
00
00
20
17
00
00
20
15
00
00
20
20
00
09
28
21
00
00
20
22
00
00
20
19
00
01
32
18
00
00
32
24
00
02
40
25
00
02
16
26
00
02
66
29
00
00
85
30
00
00
20
1183 ¼jkLrk½
1183 ¼jkLrk½
1183 ¼jkLrk½
1183 ¼jkLrk½
1183 ¼jkLrk½
00
0000
0000
05
0505
0505
75
7575
7575
1251
00
08
37
1250
00
01
91
1249
00
00
20
1437
00
00
20
1436
00
00
20
1252
00
01
31
1253
00
04
26
1254
00
04
44
1266
00
07
42
1265
00
01
26
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3903
1267
00
02
45
1267@3930
00
01
24
1268
00
00
20
1281
00
01
96
1282
00
07
06
1311
00
05
50
1310
00
00
20
1312
00
02
98
1313
00
00
20
1314
00
04
92
1315
00
00
20
1317
00
00
78
1318
00
03
33
1323
00
07
74
1324@3931
00
00
20
1325
00
00
20
1329
00
00
34
1330
00
13
47
1332
00
03
50
1812
00
16
17
ch’kwuiwj egkSjh Fkkuk uacj&154
ch’kwuiwj egkSjh Fkkuk uacj&154
ch’kwuiwj egkSjh Fkkuk uacj&154
ch’kwuiwj egkSjh Fkkuk uacj&154
ch’kwuiwj egkSjh Fkkuk uacj&154
2727
00
04
45
2728
00
06
28
2732
00
05
68
2729
00
00
20
2733
00
04
74
2731
00
00
20
2734
00
02
53
2735
00
00
20
2739
00
09
48
2738
00
10
40
2740
00
00
57
2737
00
02
39
2804
00
06
78
2831
00
01
91
2830
00
02
75
2826
00
03
44
2827
00
02
71
2828
00
02
53
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3904
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2806
00
00
20
2825
00
00
20
2823
00
11
34
2822
00
01
82
2821
00
06
07
2819
00
04
82
2818
00
00
20
2820
00
00
20
2855
00
01
63
2817
00
00
20
2816
00
01
73
2815
00
00
20
2813
00
00
20
2856
00
06
54
2857
00
03
71
2858
00
07
52
2859
00
00
20
2896
00
07
48
2895
00
05
21
2891
00
01
93
2892
00
00
20
2890
00
03
44
2889
00
03
87
2885
00
08
52
2882
00
03
27
2883
00
03
76
2881
00
05
54
2879
00
04
30
2930 ¼jkLrk½
2930 ¼jkLrk½
2930 ¼jkLrk½
2930 ¼jkLrk½
2930 ¼jkLrk½
00
0000
0000
02
0202
0202
35
3535
3535
1959
00
00
20
1954
00
21
47
1951
00
00
84
1955
00
08
32
1956
00
00
32
1949
00
03
00
1973
00
01
01
1948
00
18
55
1974
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3905
1947
00
04
76
1946
00
05
16
1945
00
03
70
1944
00
06
04
1943
00
04
81
1942
00
04
55
1941
00
04
44
1940
00
04
40
1938
00
05
02
1937
00
00
20
1933
00
13
46
1932
00
02
97
2917¼jkLrk½
2917¼jkLrk½
2917¼jkLrk½
2917¼jkLrk½
2917¼jkLrk½
00
0000
0000
06
0606
0606
85
8585
8585
1931
00
00
38
1863
00
00
20
1857
00
07
12
1856
00
01
25
1855
00
00
85
1844
00
00
38
1843
00
00
20
1751
00
00
85
1752
00
00
20
1750
00
01
83
1749
00
09
85
1748
00
01
52
lwjchj
lwjchj
lwjchj
lwjchj
lwjchj
213
00
18
25
Fkkuk uacj&152
Fkkuk uacj&152
Fkkuk uacj&152
Fkkuk uacj&152
Fkkuk uacj&152
214
00
04
82
215
00
01
57
821
00
00
20
820
00
00
20
819
00
01
43
815
00
05
01
814
00
03
63
816
00
00
20
813
00
00
20
812
00
09
53
808
00
00
20
811
00
02
45
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3906
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
809
00
02
81
810
00
00
20
837
00
00
66
836
00
00
20
835
00
00
20
838
00
03
09
839
00
03
62
840
00
01
86
841
00
00
26
855
00
00
20
856
00
28
94
976
00
00
20
858
00
00
25
859
00
00
20
857
00
00
73
865
00
04
16
964
00
00
20
866
00
04
25
974
00
01
28
973
00
01
62
971
00
00
37
972
00
03
01
970
00
00
45
968
00
04
49
965
00
00
73
966
00
01
10
963
00
03
50
962
00
02
00
961
00
00
20
960
00
00
63
993
00
02
80
992
00
02
22
994
00
03
26
995
00
01
03
997
00
00
94
996
00
00
20
998
00
00
91
1229
00
00
60
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3907
1228
00
02
79
996
00
00
20
1227
00
04
96
1226
00
07
42
1225
00
00
20
1221
00
03
63
1222
00
05
32
1225
00
00
20
1220
00
02
63
1022
00
00
20
1219
00
04
41
1218
00
01
64
1217
00
00
43
1216
00
05
36
1223
00
00
20
1207
00
00
20
1209
00
04
65
1210
00
03
92
1208
00
06
04
1211
00
14
44
1204
00
00
77
1199
00
00
71
1198
00
07
65
1190
00
08
03
1185
00
06
06
1179
00
03
53
1178
00
00
20
1176
00
00
20
1174
00
00
20
1173
00
00
20
1175
00
00
20
1171
00
09
46
1162
00
00
39
1160
00
00
20
1163
00
02
85
1164
00
00
20
1170
00
00
20
1159
00
04
79
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3908
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1158
00
04
79
1041 ¼jkLrk½
1041 ¼jkLrk½
1041 ¼jkLrk½
1041 ¼jkLrk½
1041 ¼jkLrk½
00
0000
0000
02
0202
0202
21
2121
2121
1125
00
00
20
1328
00
01
22
1329
00
05
25
1330
00
01
79
1331
00
00
94
1332
00
03
89
1333
00
00
28
1340
00
03
16
1342
00
02
12
1343
00
00
20
1341
00
01
77
1339
00
07
37
1345
00
00
20
1348
00
03
11
1347
00
00
20
1350
00
00
20
1524
00
00
20
1349
00
03
15
1523
00
02
45
1524
00
00
20
1522
00
03
14
1520
00
05
71
1415 ¼dPpk jkLrk½
1415 ¼dPpk jkLrk½
1415 ¼dPpk jkLrk½
1415 ¼dPpk jkLrk½
1415 ¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
0000
0000
01
0101
0101
89
8989
8989
1405
00
05
30
1366
00
00
61
1365
00
00
20
1404
00
14
11
1406
00
10
55
1414
00
00
20
1407
00
02
13
1408
00
02
45
1409
00
04
39
1401
00
04
58
1400
00
01
66
1397
00
01
32
1424
00
01
11
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3909
1426
00
03
70
1427
00
09
30
1428
00
05
04
1429
00
00
99
1430
00
02
98
1431
00
00
20
bBkjh
bBkjh
bBkjh
bBkjh
bBkjh
772
00
14
69
Fkkuk uacj&145
Fkkuk uacj&145
Fkkuk uacj&145
Fkkuk uacj&145
Fkkuk uacj&145
773
00
00
20
808
00
05
15
809
00
00
20
807
00
11
09
806
00
08
02
805
00
06
28
804
00
07
23
651
00
01
94
650
00
04
02
649
00
09
32
648
00
04
36
647
00
02
17
813
00
03
34
634
00
00
20
635
00
00
20
814
00
25
45
815
00
11
96
615
00
04
84
614
00
00
20
816
00
00
20
620
00
01
16
619
00
00
90
616
00
04
87
618
00
01
77
617
00
00
93
395
00
07
18
394
00
18
97
396
00
00
20
397
00
00
20
398
00
00
20
399
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3910
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
400
00
00
20
401
00
01
52
402
00
00
74
403
00
00
20
404
00
00
20
405¼ukyk½
405¼ukyk½
405¼ukyk½
405¼ukyk½
405¼ukyk½
00
0000
0000
02
0202
0202
21
2121
2121
511
00
02
97
511@877
00
02
34
509¼jkLrk½
509¼jkLrk½
509¼jkLrk½
509¼jkLrk½
509¼jkLrk½
00
0000
0000
01
0101
0101
60
6060
6060
407
00
02
06
408
00
00
20
406
00
03
85
410
00
00
53
413
00
00
20
333
00
19
27
366
00
00
20
334
00
00
20
335
00
00
20
336
00
00
88
332
00
03
57
339
00
00
49
340
00
01
67
331
00
06
79
330@875
00
02
66
330
00
01
97
341
00
01
99
342
00
00
20
328
00
07
76
329
00
00
63
322
00
00
85
323
00
07
07
321
00
00
20
324
00
12
12
325
00
02
10
319 ¼fQYM psuy½
319 ¼fQYM psuy½
319 ¼fQYM psuy½
319 ¼fQYM psuy½
319 ¼fQYM psuy½
00
0000
0000
01
0101
0101
10
1010
1010
316
00
05
28
307
00
03
96
315
00
08
12
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3911
309
00
00
20
310
00
02
82
311
00
03
28
312
00
13
24
ggok
ggok
ggok
ggok
ggok
1152¼jkLrk½
1152¼jkLrk½
1152¼jkLrk½
1152¼jkLrk½
1152¼jkLrk½
00
0000
0000
01
0101
0101
67
6767
6767
Fkkuk uacj&130
Fkkuk uacj&130
Fkkuk uacj&130
Fkkuk uacj&130
Fkkuk uacj&130
1151
00
03
22
1150
00
01
38
1147
00
01
75
1146
00
03
28
1145
00
04
80
1143
00
06
76
1142
00
09
23
1141¼fQYM psuy½
1141¼fQYM psuy½
1141¼fQYM psuy½
1141¼fQYM psuy½
1141¼fQYM psuy½
00
0000
0000
00
0000
0000
79
7979
7979
1139
00
00
20
1138
00
05
53
1137
00
02
27
1126
00
00
20
1136
00
04
84
1134
00
29
31
1134@1483
00
00
20
txnh’kiwj
txnh’kiwj
txnh’kiwj
txnh’kiwj
txnh’kiwj
286
00
04
84
Fkkuk uacj&129
Fkkuk uacj&129
Fkkuk uacj&129
Fkkuk uacj&129
Fkkuk uacj&129
285
00
00
20
288
00
02
26
287
00
06
89
283
00
03
00
291
00
00
20
315
00
00
51
281
00
01
57
316
00
00
64
314
00
00
20
250
00
01
61
317
00
14
07
249
00
00
26
318
00
00
45
324
00
00
25
325
00
00
20
326
00
00
65
332
00
07
30
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3912
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
334
00
00
20
336
00
00
20
331
00
00
54
333
00
01
02
337
00
03
27
330
00
00
20
342
00
03
27
338
00
00
47
340
00
00
54
341
00
00
57
506
00
02
26
507
00
02
41
509
00
02
72
510
00
00
42
512
00
02
78
508
00
00
20
528
00
00
20
527
00
04
67
526
00
00
20
537
00
00
20
529
00
00
20
535
00
03
81
536
00
00
99
539
00
03
44
540
00
01
95
542
00
02
07
543
00
02
97
534
00
02
17
544
00
04
15
550
00
03
11
551
00
03
26
556
00
03
94
555
00
00
20
552
00
00
20
554
00
00
20
557
00
03
98
559
00
00
20
558
00
03
83
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3913
564¼jkLrk½
564¼jkLrk½
564¼jkLrk½
564¼jkLrk½
564¼jkLrk½
00
0000
0000
03
0303
0303
05
0505
0505
856
00
09
67
857
00
00
81
858
00
03
34
859
00
01
87
862
00
00
20
860
00
05
13
890
00
00
31
861
00
04
96
889
00
02
17
863
00
04
18
880
00
03
32
881
00
05
89
885
00
00
25
882
00
01
67
886
00
00
20
884
00
03
73
883
00
05
42
jhlkSjk
jhlkSjk
jhlkSjk
jhlkSjk
jhlkSjk
4469
00
01
12
Fkkuk uacj&131
Fkkuk uacj&131
Fkkuk uacj&131
Fkkuk uacj&131
Fkkuk uacj&131
4468
00
00
20
4467
00
00
20
4425
00
01
50
4426
00
01
15
4427
00
01
91
4433
00
07
82
4432
00
00
20
4434
00
04
52
4436
00
06
96
4437
00
00
59
4438
00
01
26
4447
00
07
12
4448
00
09
79
4449
00
00
20
4450
00
09
48
4451
00
05
83
4452
00
03
92
4453
00
09
76
4356
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3914
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
4454
00
00
93
4520
00
01
53
4519
00
01
62
4518
00
00
20
4521
00
03
76
4522
00
06
86
4531
00
00
20
4523
00
00
20
4530
00
00
20
4524
00
00
53
4525
00
02
27
4526
00
04
07
4527
00
03
87
4528
00
02
69
4529
00
00
47
3553
00
03
75
3509
00
08
31
3552
00
00
20
3510
00
02
29
3551
00
00
20
3511
00
02
31
3512
00
02
21
3513
00
01
75
3514
00
01
48
3508
00
01
20
3515
00
00
46
3516
00
05
69
3497
00
00
20
3496
00
00
20
3517
00
03
04
3518
00
02
18
3520
00
00
20
3494
00
00
47
3493
00
01
81
3519
00
06
30
3492
00
01
80
3491
00
02
34
3207
00
00
61
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3915
3211
00
07
08
3208
00
00
22
3210
00
00
20
3217
00
18
75
3215
00
00
20
3216
00
00
44
3219
00
04
17
3228
00
14
38
3227
00
02
15
3226
00
00
28
3225
00
00
20
3103¼jkLrk½
3103¼jkLrk½
3103¼jkLrk½
3103¼jkLrk½
3103¼jkLrk½
00
0000
0000
01
0101
0101
66
6666
6666
3007
00
03
02
2995
00
01
86
2994
00
00
20
2993
00
00
20
3000
00
02
48
3001
00
00
20
2996
00
06
28
2997
00
00
20
2999
00
04
69
2998
00
02
24
2865¼jkLrk½
2865¼jkLrk½
2865¼jkLrk½
2865¼jkLrk½
2865¼jkLrk½
00
0000
0000
01
0101
0101
46
4646
4646
2965
00
05
08
2966
00
00
20
2963
00
00
20
2964
00
04
32
2963
00
02
49
2958
00
01
91
2957
00
01
55
2956
00
03
28
2904
00
00
20
2905
00
00
29
2906
00
00
83
2955
00
02
00
2907
00
01
11
2908
00
02
15
2953
00
00
45
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3916
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2952
00
00
20
2951
00
00
20
2932
00
00
20
2900
00
00
20
2909
00
02
89
2910
00
01
47
2911
00
01
53
2912
00
04
45
2899
00
07
10
2913
00
01
26
2914
00
00
20
2896
00
00
20
2897
00
01
49
2898
00
04
49
2831
00
03
22
2879
00
04
65
2878
00
00
26
2877
00
00
20
2834
00
00
20
2833
00
10
08
2832
00
02
07
2829
00
00
20
2836
00
04
13
2835
00
06
34
2787
00
08
63
2786
00
00
20
2788
00
01
91
2662
00
02
81
2665
00
02
76
2661
00
00
20
2666
00
03
03
2671
00
03
34
2670
00
00
20
2672
00
00
20
2673
00
03
73
2674
00
05
06
2637
00
02
73
2638
00
03
60
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3917
2639
00
00
29
2640
00
06
55
2641
00
01
00
vxs;ku
vxs;ku
vxs;ku
vxs;ku
vxs;ku
4450
00
06
57
Fkkuk uacj&113
Fkkuk uacj&113
Fkkuk uacj&113
Fkkuk uacj&113
Fkkuk uacj&113
4445
00
02
89
4449
00
00
20
4448
00
01
01
4451
00
04
72
4452
00
00
20
4454
00
13
87
4543
00
03
91
4542
00
00
20
4455
00
04
76
4456
00
00
20
4535
00
17
98
4540
00
00
20
4538
00
00
57
4539
00
00
20
4537
00
00
20
4536
00
04
57
4527
00
00
35
4528
00
04
39
4526
00
00
20
4529
00
00
82
4533
00
00
20
4530
00
04
11
4512
00
00
20
4531
00
00
49
4511
00
04
61
4510
00
00
20
4509
00
00
34
4507
00
02
11
4506
00
00
20
4505
00
00
20
4508
00
06
43
4495
00
01
42
3668¼dPpk jkLrk½
3668¼dPpk jkLrk½
3668¼dPpk jkLrk½
3668¼dPpk jkLrk½
3668¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
0000
0000
02
0202
0202
42
4242
4242
4598
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3918
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
4599
00
03
46
4600
00
04
15
4601
00
00
60
4602
00
04
93
4603
00
05
57
4611
00
00
20
4610
00
01
63
4609
00
08
16
4606
00
01
51
4607
00
00
20
4608
00
08
33
3666
00
00
80
3665
00
04
72
3664
00
00
20
3701
00
00
20
3702
00
05
94
3703
00
00
61
3704
00
07
31
3705
00
00
20
3709
00
00
72
3708
00
02
94
3707
00
00
20
3710
00
00
20
3491
00
04
34
3489
00
00
29
3490
00
04
41
3492
00
01
52
3493
00
03
40
3488
00
00
20
3494
00
06
68
3496
00
00
20
3487
00
01
66
3485
00
00
20
3486
00
02
42
3495
00
03
20
3469
00
07
20
3468
00
04
08
3470
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3919
3464
00
04
62
3465
00
00
53
3463
00
01
72
3454
00
09
43
3453
00
00
59
3452
00
07
91
3451
00
00
20
3450
00
01
82
3449
00
04
24
3455
00
00
20
3445
00
01
21
3448
00
04
09
3446
00
01
01
3447
00
03
04
3443
00
00
20
3442
00
07
59
3439
00
00
20
3440
00
02
97
3441
00
10
98
3395
00
00
20
3420
00
01
24
3401
00
00
20
3402
00
01
60
3403
00
03
52
3404
00
05
02
3405
00
03
46
3406
00
02
20
3407
00
00
20
3332
00
00
25
3331
00
05
51
3330
00
00
20
3329
00
06
43
3324
00
00
20
3328
00
05
38
3326
00
04
52
3325
00
01
28
2843¼jkLrk½
2843¼jkLrk½
2843¼jkLrk½
2843¼jkLrk½
2843¼jkLrk½
00
0000
0000
01
0101
0101
66
6666
6666
2618
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3920
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2622
00
06
66
2620
00
01
91
2621
00
08
69
2590
00
02
78
2591
00
00
20
2589
00
01
60
2587
00
05
06
2588
00
04
67
2570
00
00
20
2578
00
07
23
2579
00
00
20
2577
00
03
71
2576
00
02
71
2531
00
06
44
2528
00
00
20
2532
00
01
93
2530
00
01
28
2524
00
01
07
2523
00
01
30
2520
00
00
63
2519
00
00
93
2533
00
01
56
1771
00
06
22
1743
00
00
41
1771@5002
00
00
75
1772
00
00
38
1773
00
00
56
1774
00
00
36
1775
00
00
37
1770
00
03
60
1769
00
00
88
1744
00
00
31
1767
00
02
63
1766
00
01
93
1765
00
00
20
1745
00
00
69
1746
00
00
93
1763
00
01
40
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3921
1762
00
01
31
1761
00
01
20
1747
00
01
84
1748
00
03
22
1760
00
00
93
1758
00
00
56
1757
00
00
34
1753
00
05
40
1750
00
00
20
1751
00
00
20
1754
00
00
20
1752
00
04
16
1807
00
04
94
1808
00
03
05
1809
00
02
26
1670
00
01
25
1810
00
01
94
1811
00
02
29
1665
00
01
66
1812
00
04
02
1664
00
03
35
1650@5021
00
02
46
1654
00
01
21
1655
00
09
39
1645
00
00
93
1644
00
00
20
1643
00
00
20
1642
00
00
20
1641
00
00
20
1640
00
00
20
1656
00
08
33
1636
00
08
70
1635
00
00
82
1527
00
04
26
1526
00
00
20
1525
00
00
20
1528
00
18
30
1529
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3922
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1522
00
11
24
1519
00
05
89
1521
00
06
19
1520
00
04
03
723 ¼jkLrk½
723 ¼jkLrk½
723 ¼jkLrk½
723 ¼jkLrk½
723 ¼jkLrk½
00
0000
0000
05
0505
0505
82
8282
8282
1512
00
01
68
1437
00
00
20
1436
00
03
25
1511
00
05
18
1510
00
06
62
1469
00
00
20
1471
00
01
06
1472
00
02
14
1470
00
00
80
1499 ¼dPpk jkLrk½
1499 ¼dPpk jkLrk½
1499 ¼dPpk jkLrk½
1499 ¼dPpk jkLrk½
1499 ¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
0000
0000
01
0101
0101
70
7070
7070
1473
00
02
74
1464
00
03
01
1463
00
00
20
1474
00
02
20
1353
00
32
74
1375
00
02
12
1376
00
03
92
1377
00
00
74
1378
00
02
96
1373
00
03
25
1371
00
00
27
1372
00
02
22
1370
00
02
24
1367
00
02
87
1368
00
02
76
1369
00
05
07
1360
00
01
71
1359
00
03
75
1358
00
01
64
1357
00
00
20
1299
00
01
34
1300
00
01
81
1301
00
01
91
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3923
1302
00
00
71
1303
00
00
20
1305
00
00
20
1306
00
03
60
1352
00
01
44
1342
00
21
82
1341
00
04
71
1330
00
05
10
1333
00
10
24
¹iQk- la- vkj&25011@14@2013&vksvkj&Iº
iou oqQekj] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 27th July, 2013
S.O. 1536.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that a
pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited in Dist. Siwan in the State of Bihar for ‘Patna to Motihari and
Baitalpur Pipeline’ for the transportation of Petroleum Product;
And, whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary
to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which is described in the
Schedule annexed to this notification;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals
Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention
to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on
which the copies of the notification issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of
India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the
pipeline under the land, to Shri Arun Kumar Jha B.A.S. & Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited. (Pipelines
Division) P.O. Dhelwan, Sipara, Dist. Patna (Bihar.) Pin – 800020.
SCHEDULE
Dist. : Siwan
State : Bihar
Mouja / Village
Survey/Block No.
Sub-Div-No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
BHIKHA BAN
28
00
10
03
Thana No-169
26
00
14
11
40
00
04
55
22(ROAD)
00
02
34
16
00
05
15
43
00
00
20
44
00
00
20
36
00
00
20
41
00
09
87
42
00
03
86
15
00
00
20
2331
00
01
38
2332(NADI)
00
03
57
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3924
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
DEURIYA
381(NADI)
00
03
25
Thana No. 153
382(ROAD)
00
01
36
379(ROAD)
00
00
20
384
00
00
38
387
00
00
20
378
00
04
12
377
00
00
20
371
00
05
35
373
00
00
20
372
00
00
20
370
00
01
03
369
00
02
82
368
00
03
42
366
00
00
25
367
00
07
41
8
00
00
20
9
00
00
20
10
00
00
53
11
00
00
81
12
00
03
00
13
00
10
22
364
00
00
20
16
00
00
20
17
00
00
20
15
00
00
20
20
00
09
28
21
00
00
20
22
00
00
20
19
00
01
32
18
00
00
32
24
00
02
40
25
00
02
16
26
00
02
66
29
00
00
85
30
00
00
20
1183(ROAD)
00
05
75
1251
00
08
37
1250
00
01
91
1249
00
00
20
1437
00
00
20
1436
00
00
20
1252
00
01
31
1253
00
04
26
1254
00
04
44
1266
00
07
42
1265
00
01
26
1267
00
02
45
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3925
1267/3930
00
01
24
1268
00
00
20
1281
00
01
96
1282
00
07
06
1311
00
05
50
1310
00
00
20
1312
00
02
98
1313
00
00
20
1314
00
04
92
1315
00
00
20
1317
00
00
78
1318
00
03
33
1323
00
07
74
1324/3931
00
00
20
1325
00
00
20
1329
00
00
34
1330
00
13
47
1332
00
03
50
1812
00
16
17
BISHUNPUR MAHUARI
2727
00
04
45
Thana No. 154
2728
00
06
28
2732
00
05
68
2729
00
00
20
2733
00
04
74
2731
00
00
20
2734
00
02
53
2735
00
00
20
2739
00
09
48
2738
00
10
40
2740
00
00
57
2737
00
02
39
2804
00
06
78
2831
00
01
91
2830
00
02
75
2826
00
03
44
2827
00
02
71
2828
00
02
53
2806
00
00
20
2825
00
00
20
2823
00
11
34
2822
00
01
82
2821
00
06
07
2819
00
04
82
2818
00
00
20
2820
00
00
20
2855
00
01
63
2817
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3926
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2816
00
01
73
2815
00
00
20
2813
00
00
20
2856
00
06
54
2857
00
03
71
2858
00
07
52
2859
00
00
20
2896
00
07
48
2895
00
05
21
2891
00
01
93
2892
00
00
20
2890
00
03
44
2889
00
03
87
2885
00
08
52
2882
00
03
27
2883
00
03
76
2881
00
05
54
2879
00
04
30
2930(ROAD)
00
02
35
1959
00
00
20
1954
00
21
47
1951
00
00
84
1955
00
08
32
1956
00
00
32
1949
00
03
00
1973
00
01
01
1948
00
18
55
1974
00
00
20
1947
00
04
76
1946
00
05
16
1945
00
03
70
1944
00
06
04
1943
00
04
81
1942
00
04
55
1941
00
04
44
1940
00
04
40
1938
00
05
02
1937
00
00
20
1933
00
13
46
1932
00
02
97
2917(ROAD)
00
06
85
1931
00
00
38
1863
00
00
20
1857
00
07
12
1856
00
01
25
1855
00
00
85
1844
00
00
38
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3927
1843
00
00
20
1751
00
00
85
1752
00
00
20
1750
00
01
83
1749
00
09
85
1748
00
01
52
SURBIR
213
00
18
25
Thana No. 152
214
00
04
82
215
00
01
57
821
00
00
20
820
00
00
20
819
00
01
43
815
00
05
01
814
00
03
63
816
00
00
20
813
00
00
20
812
00
09
53
808
00
00
20
811
00
02
45
809
00
02
81
810
00
00
20
837
00
00
66
836
00
00
20
835
00
00
20
838
00
03
09
839
00
03
62
840
00
01
86
841
00
00
26
855
00
00
20
856
00
28
94
976
00
00
20
858
00
00
25
859
00
00
20
857
00
00
73
865
00
04
16
964
00
00
20
866
00
04
25
974
00
01
28
973
00
01
62
971
00
00
37
972
00
03
01
970
00
00
45
968
00
04
49
965
00
00
73
966
00
01
10
963
00
03
50
962
00
02
00
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3928
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
961
00
00
20
960
00
00
63
993
00
02
80
992
00
02
22
994
00
03
26
995
00
01
03
997
00
00
94
996
00
00
20
998
00
00
91
1229
00
00
60
1228
00
02
79
996
00
00
20
1227
00
04
96
1226
00
07
42
1225
00
00
20
1221
00
03
63
1222
00
05
32
1225
00
00
20
1220
00
02
63
1022
00
00
20
1219
00
04
41
1218
00
01
64
1217
00
00
43
1216
00
05
36
1223
00
00
20
1207
00
00
20
1209
00
04
65
1210
00
03
92
1208
00
06
04
1211
00
14
44
1204
00
00
77
1199
00
00
71
1198
00
07
65
1190
00
08
03
1185
00
06
06
1179
00
03
53
1178
00
00
20
1176
00
00
20
1174
00
00
20
1173
00
00
20
1175
00
00
20
1171
00
09
46
1162
00
00
39
1160
00
00
20
1163
00
02
85
1164
00
00
20
1170
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3929
1159
00
04
79
1158
00
04
79
1041 (ROAD)
00
02
21
1125
00
00
20
1328
00
01
22
1329
00
05
25
1330
00
01
79
1331
00
00
94
1332
00
03
89
1333
00
00
28
1340
00
03
16
1342
00
02
12
1343
00
00
20
1341
00
01
77
1339
00
07
37
1345
00
00
20
1348
00
03
11
1347
00
00
20
1350
00
00
20
1524
00
00
20
1349
00
03
15
1523
00
02
45
1524
00
00
20
1522
00
03
14
1520
00
05
71
1415(CART TRACK)
00
01
89
1405
00
05
30
1366
00
00
61
1365
00
00
20
1404
00
14
11
1406
00
10
55
1414
00
00
20
1407
00
02
13
1408
00
02
45
1409
00
04
39
1401
00
04
58
1400
00
01
66
1397
00
01
32
1424
00
01
11
1426
00
03
70
1427
00
09
30
1428
00
05
04
1429
00
00
99
1430
00
02
98
1431
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3930
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ITHARI
772
00
14
69
Thana No. 145
773
00
00
20
808
00
05
15
809
00
00
20
807
00
11
09
806
00
08
02
805
00
06
28
804
00
07
23
651
00
01
94
650
00
04
02
649
00
09
32
648
00
04
36
647
00
02
17
813
00
03
34
634
00
00
20
635
00
00
20
814
00
25
45
815
00
11
96
615
00
04
84
614
00
00
20
816
00
00
20
620
00
01
16
619
00
00
90
616
00
04
87
618
00
01
77
617
00
00
93
395
00
07
18
394
00
18
97
396
00
00
20
397
00
00
20
398
00
00
20
399
00
00
20
400
00
00
20
401
00
01
52
402
00
00
74
403
00
00
20
404
00
00
20
405(NALA)
00
02
21
511
00
02
97
511/877
00
02
34
509(ROAD)
00
01
60
407
00
02
06
408
00
00
20
406
00
03
85
410
00
00
53
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3931
413
00
00
20
333
00
19
27
366
00
00
20
334
00
00
20
335
00
00
20
336
00
00
88
332
00
03
57
339
00
00
49
340
00
01
67
331
00
06
79
330/875
00
02
66
330
00
01
97
341
00
01
99
342
00
00
20
328
00
07
76
329
00
00
63
322
00
00
85
323
00
07
07
321
00
00
20
324
00
12
12
325
00
02
10
319(Field Channel)
00
01
10
316
00
05
28
307
00
03
96
315
00
08
12
309
00
00
20
310
00
02
82
311
00
03
28
312
00
13
24
HAHWA
1152(ROAD)
00
01
67
Thana No. 130
1151
00
03
22
1150
00
01
38
1147
00
01
75
1146
00
03
28
1145
00
04
80
1143
00
06
76
1142
00
09
23
1141(Field Channel)
00
00
79
1139
00
00
20
1138
00
05
53
1137
00
02
27
1126
00
00
20
1136
00
04
84
1134
00
29
31
1134/1483
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3932
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
JAGDISHPUR
286
00
04
84
Thana No. 129
285
00
00
20
288
00
02
26
287
00
06
89
283
00
03
00
291
00
00
20
315
00
00
51
281
00
01
57
316
00
00
64
314
00
00
20
250
00
01
61
317
00
14
07
249
00
00
26
318
00
00
45
324
00
00
25
325
00
00
20
326
00
00
65
332
00
07
30
334
00
00
20
336
00
00
20
331
00
00
54
333
00
01
02
337
00
03
27
330
00
00
20
342
00
03
27
338
00
00
47
340
00
00
54
341
00
00
57
506
00
02
26
507
00
02
41
509
00
02
72
510
00
00
42
512
00
02
78
508
00
00
20
528
00
00
20
527
00
04
67
526
00
00
20
537
00
00
20
529
00
00
20
535
00
03
81
536
00
00
99
539
00
03
44
540
00
01
95
542
00
02
07
543
00
02
97
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3933
534
00
02
17
544
00
04
15
550
00
03
11
551
00
03
26
556
00
03
94
555
00
00
20
552
00
00
20
554
00
00
20
557
00
03
98
559
00
00
20
558
00
03
83
564(ROAD)
00
03
05
856
00
09
67
857
00
00
81
858
00
03
34
859
00
01
87
862
00
00
20
860
00
05
13
890
00
00
31
861
00
04
96
889
00
02
17
863
00
04
18
880
00
03
32
881
00
05
89
885
00
00
25
882
00
01
67
886
00
00
20
884
00
03
73
883
00
05
42
RISAURA
4469
00
01
12
Thana No. 131
4468
00
00
20
4467
00
00
20
4425
00
01
50
4426
00
01
15
4427
00
01
91
4433
00
07
82
4432
00
00
20
4434
00
04
52
4436
00
06
96
4437
00
00
59
4438
00
01
26
4447
00
07
12
4448
00
09
79
4449
00
00
20
4450
00
09
48
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3934
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
4451
00
05
83
4452
00
03
92
4453
00
09
76
4356
00
00
20
4454
00
00
93
4520
00
01
53
4519
00
01
62
4518
00
00
20
4521
00
03
76
4522
00
06
86
4531
00
00
20
4523
00
00
20
4530
00
00
20
4524
00
00
53
4525
00
02
27
4526
00
04
07
4527
00
03
87
4528
00
02
69
4529
00
00
47
3553
00
03
75
3509
00
08
31
3552
00
00
20
3510
00
02
29
3551
00
00
20
3511
00
02
31
3512
00
02
21
3513
00
01
75
3514
00
01
48
3508
00
01
20
3515
00
00
46
3516
00
05
69
3497
00
00
20
3496
00
00
20
3517
00
03
04
3518
00
02
18
3520
00
00
20
3494
00
00
47
3493
00
01
81
3519
00
06
30
3492
00
01
80
3491
00
02
34
3207
00
00
61
3211
00
07
08
3208
00
00
22
3210
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3935
3217
00
18
75
3215
00
00
20
3216
00
00
44
3219
00
04
17
3228
00
14
38
3227
00
02
15
3226
00
00
28
3225
00
00
20
3103(ROAD)
00
01
66
3007
00
03
02
2995
00
01
86
2994
00
00
20
2993
00
00
20
3000
00
02
48
3001
00
00
20
2996
00
06
28
2997
00
00
20
2999
00
04
69
2998
00
02
24
2865(ROAD)
00
01
46
2965
00
05
08
2966
00
00
20
2963
00
00
20
2964
00
04
32
2963
00
02
49
2958
00
01
91
2957
00
01
55
2956
00
03
28
2904
00
00
20
2905
00
00
29
2906
00
00
83
2955
00
02
00
2907
00
01
11
2908
00
02
15
2953
00
00
45
2952
00
00
20
2951
00
00
20
2932
00
00
20
2900
00
00
20
2909
00
02
89
2910
00
01
47
2911
00
01
53
2912
00
04
45
2899
00
07
10
2913
00
01
26
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3936
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2914
00
00
20
2896
00
00
20
2897
00
01
49
2898
00
04
49
2831
00
03
22
2879
00
04
65
2878
00
00
26
2877
00
00
20
2834
00
00
20
2833
00
10
08
2832
00
02
07
2829
00
00
20
2836
00
04
13
2835
00
06
34
2787
00
08
63
2786
00
00
20
2788
00
01
91
2662
00
02
81
2665
00
02
76
2661
00
00
20
2666
00
03
03
2671
00
03
34
2670
00
00
20
2672
00
00
20
2673
00
03
73
2674
00
05
06
2637
00
02
73
2638
00
03
60
2639
00
00
29
2640
00
06
55
2641
00
01
00
AGEYAN
4450
00
06
57
Thana No. 113
4445
00
02
89
4449
00
00
20
4448
00
01
01
4451
00
04
72
4452
00
00
20
4454
00
13
87
4543
00
03
91
4542
00
00
20
4455
00
04
76
4456
00
00
20
4535
00
17
98
4540
00
00
20
4538
00
00
57
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3937
4539
00
00
20
4537
00
00
20
4536
00
04
57
4527
00
00
35
4528
00
04
39
4526
00
00
20
4529
00
00
82
4533
00
00
20
4530
00
04
11
4512
00
00
20
4531
00
00
49
4511
00
04
61
4510
00
00
20
4509
00
00
34
4507
00
02
11
4506
00
00
20
4505
00
00
20
4508
00
06
43
4495
00
01
42
3668(CART TRACK)
00
02
42
4598
00
00
20
4599
00
03
46
4600
00
04
15
4601
00
00
60
4602
00
04
93
4603
00
05
57
4611
00
00
20
4610
00
01
63
4609
00
08
16
4606
00
01
51
4607
00
00
20
4608
00
08
33
3666
00
00
80
3665
00
04
72
3664
00
00
20
3701
00
00
20
3702
00
05
94
3703
00
00
61
3704
00
07
31
3705
00
00
20
3709
00
00
72
3708
00
02
94
3707
00
00
20
3710
00
00
20
3491
00
04
34
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3938
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
3489
00
00
29
3490
00
04
41
3492
00
01
52
3493
00
03
40
3488
00
00
20
3494
00
06
68
3496
00
00
20
3487
00
01
66
3485
00
00
20
3486
00
02
42
3495
00
03
20
3469
00
07
20
3468
00
04
08
3470
00
00
20
3464
00
04
62
3465
00
00
53
3463
00
01
72
3454
00
09
43
3453
00
00
59
3452
00
07
91
3451
00
00
20
3450
00
01
82
3449
00
04
24
3455
00
00
20
3445
00
01
21
3448
00
04
09
3446
00
01
01
3447
00
03
04
3443
00
00
20
3442
00
07
59
3439
00
00
20
3440
00
02
97
3441
00
10
98
3395
00
00
20
3420
00
01
24
3401
00
00
20
3402
00
01
60
3403
00
03
52
3404
00
05
02
3405
00
03
46
3406
00
02
20
3407
00
00
20
3332
00
00
25
3331
00
05
51
3330
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3939
3329
00
06
43
3324
00
00
20
3328
00
05
38
3326
00
04
52
3325
00
01
28
2843(ROAD)
00
01
66
2618
00
00
20
2622
00
06
66
2620
00
01
91
2621
00
08
69
2590
00
02
78
2591
00
00
20
2589
00
01
60
2587
00
05
06
2588
00
04
67
2570
00
00
20
2578
00
07
23
2579
00
00
20
2577
00
03
71
2576
00
02
71
2531
00
06
44
2528
00
00
20
2532
00
01
93
2530
00
01
28
2524
00
01
07
2523
00
01
30
2520
00
00
63
2519
00
00
93
2533
00
01
56
1771
00
06
22
1743
00
00
41
1771/5002
00
00
75
1772
00
00
38
1773
00
00
56
1774
00
00
36
1775
00
00
37
1770
00
03
60
1769
00
00
88
1744
00
00
31
1767
00
02
63
1766
00
01
93
1765
00
00
20
1745
00
00
69
1746
00
00
93
1763
00
01
40
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3940
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1762
00
01
31
1761
00
01
20
1747
00
01
84
1748
00
03
22
1760
00
00
93
1758
00
00
56
1757
00
00
34
1753
00
05
40
1750
00
00
20
1751
00
00
20
1754
00
00
20
1752
00
04
16
1807
00
04
94
1808
00
03
05
1809
00
02
26
1670
00
01
25
1810
00
01
94
1811
00
02
29
1665
00
01
66
1812
00
04
02
1664
00
03
35
1650/5021
00
02
46
1654
00
01
21
1655
00
09
39
1645
00
00
93
1644
00
00
20
1643
00
00
20
1642
00
00
20
1641
00
00
20
1640
00
00
20
1656
00
08
33
1636
00
08
70
1635
00
00
82
1527
00
04
26
1526
00
00
20
1525
00
00
20
1528
00
18
30
1529
00
00
20
1522
00
11
24
1519
00
05
89
1521
00
06
19
1520
00
04
03
723(ROAD)
00
05
82
1512
00
01
68
1437
00
00
20
1436
00
03
25
1511
00
05
18
1510
00
06
62
1469
00
00
20
1471
00
01
06
1472
00
02
14
1470
00
00
80
1499(Cart Track)
00
01
70
1473
00
02
74
1464
00
03
01
1463
00
00
20
1474
00
02
20
1353
00
32
74
1375
00
02
12
1376
00
03
92
1377
00
00
74
1378
00
02
96
1373
00
03
25
1371
00
00
27
1372
00
02
22
1370
00
02
24
1367
00
02
87
1368
00
02
76
1369
00
05
07
1360
00
01
71
1359
00
03
75
1358
00
01
64
1357
00
00
20
1299
00
01
34
1300
00
01
81
1301
00
01
91
1302
00
00
71
1303
00
00
20
1305
00
00
20
1306
00
03
60
1352
00
01
44
1342
00
21
82
1341
00
04
71
1330
00
05
10
1333
00
10
24
[F. No. R-25011/14/2013-OR-I]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3941
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
ubZ fnYyh] 27 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1537-—dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slk izrhr gksrk gS fd yksd fgr esa ;g vko';d gS fd iVuk ls eksfrgkjh vkSj csrkyiqj rd
isVªksfy;e inkFkksZ ds ifjogu gsrq ftyk lkju] jkT; fcgkj esa bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkuh pkfg, A
vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slh ikbiykbu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, vko';d izrhr gksrk gS fd ml Hkwfe esa ftlds Hkhrj mDr
ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkus dk izLrko gS vkSj tks bl vf/lwpuk ls layXu vuqlwfp esa o£.kr gS] mi;ksx dk vtZu fd;k tk,_
vr% vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] iSVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbUl (Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/dkj dk vtZu) vf/fu;e] 1962 (1962
dk 50) dh /kkjk 3 dh mi&/kjk (1) }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] mDr Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/dkj dk vtZu djus ds vius
vk'k; dh ?kks"k.kk djrh gSA
dksbZ O;fDr] tks mDr vuqlwfp esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa fgrc¼ gS] ml rkjh[k ls ftldks] Hkkjr ds jkti=k esa ;Fkk izdkf'kr bl
vfèklwpuk dh izfr;ka lk/kj.k turk dks miyC/ djk nh tkrh gS] bDdhl fnu ds vUnj] Hkwfe ds Hkhrj ikbiykbu fcNk, tkus gsrq mi;ksx
ds vf/dkj ds vtZu ds fy,] Jh v:.k dqekj >k] fc-iz-ls- o l{ke izkf/dkjh bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM] (ikbiykbu fMohtu)
iVuk] iks-vks- <syok] flikjk] ftyk iVuk] fiu% 800020] fcgkj dks fyf[kr :i eas vk{ksi Hkst ldsxkA
vuqlwph
ftyk % lkju
jkT; % fcgkj
ekStk@xzke
losZ@Cykd@la- (IyksV la-)
lc&Mho&la-
{ks=kiQy
gsDVs;j
vkjs
oxZ ehVj
1
2
3
4
5
6
djuiqjk
djuiqjk
djuiqjk
djuiqjk
djuiqjk
3217
00
03
23
Fkkuk uacj % 85
Fkkuk uacj % 85
Fkkuk uacj % 85
Fkkuk uacj % 85
Fkkuk uacj % 85
3216
00
01
42
3215
00
00
60
3209
00
04
55
3210
00
04
54
3211
00
08
36
3212
00
03
58
3213
00
00
20
3207
00
00
20
2343&dPpk jkLrk
00
00
88
2134
00
00
98
2131
00
00
20
2135
00
14
28
2136
00
01
46
2150
00
01
26
2149
00
03
18
2148
00
02
79
2146
00
01
57
2145
00
00
20
2147
00
00
20
2161
00
05
61
3942
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3943
2162
00
00
20
2160
00
03
90
2163
00
02
28
2159
00
00
80
2164
00
06
96
2165
00
07
67
2158
00
00
20
2106
00
02
90
2166&dPpk jkLrk
00
01
70
2176
00
00
20
2177
00
02
44
2193
00
02
16
2194
00
06
67
2196
00
00
67
2195
00
00
20
2197
00
01
60
2198
00
00
82
2192
00
00
20
2199
00
04
52
2206
00
02
09
2200
00
00
48
2205
00
04
94
2207
00
05
49
2214
00
00
20
2212
00
00
64
2213
00
05
22
2218
00
05
91
2217
00
00
20
2223
00
01
04
2224
00
05
59
2225
00
00
20
2046&dPpk jkLrk
00
00
72
1393
00
00
20
1391
00
11
50
1390
00
01
81
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3944
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1360
00
00
04
1389
00
05
16
1388
00
05
93
1383
00
00
22
1386
00
00
22
1387
00
00
20
1385
00
02
61
1384
00
03
54
1377
00
00
20
1378
00
00
20
1514
00
01
51
1466
00
01
18
1513
00
03
66
1512
00
11
05
1511
00
12
06
1510
00
01
03
1521
00
00
20
1491
00
01
20
1509
00
03
08
1508
00
05
04
1501
00
03
99
1505
00
00
20
1500
00
00
73
1499
00
03
14
1498
00
02
32
1502
00
00
20
1497
00
00
77
1526
00
19
12
1547&jkLrk
00
02
19
3227&dsuky
00
06
66
1564
00
04
97
jkeiqj
jkeiqj
jkeiqj
jkeiqj
jkeiqj
561
00
05
37
Fkkuk uacj % 87
Fkkuk uacj % 87
Fkkuk uacj % 87
Fkkuk uacj % 87
Fkkuk uacj % 87
563
00
12
44
565
00
00
18
566
00
15
93
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3945
623
00
03
48
596
00
07
40
622
00
03
01
595@719
00
04
26
597
00
05
97
617&dPpk jkLrk
00
00
20
620
00
00
20
600
00
00
20
601
00
09
75
602&dPpk jkLrk
00
01
21
ydr Nkijk
ydr Nkijk
ydr Nkijk
ydr Nkijk
ydr Nkijk
1899 ¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
00
90
Fkkuk uacj % 89
Fkkuk uacj % 89
Fkkuk uacj % 89
Fkkuk uacj % 89
Fkkuk uacj % 89
1508
00
00
38
1509
00
08
74
1510
00
03
12
1519
00
02
03
1520
00
05
87
1518
00
08
39
1515
00
00
20
1517
00
02
84
1521
00
01
22
1596
00
04
87
1525
00
01
76
1524
00
00
20
1526
00
07
08
1527
00
03
33
1528
00
00
20
1591
00
03
38
1589
00
02
17
1592
00
00
20
1587
00
00
40
1590
00
05
13
1588
00
03
36
1581
00
00
97
1609
00
03
25
1610
00
04
84
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3946
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1611
00
05
61
1612
00
04
09
1613
00
03
74
1614
00
04
09
1615
00
00
20
1677
00
00
25
1675
00
09
92
1674
00
01
38
1628
00
01
40
1629
00
06
30
1630
00
03
58
1633
00
00
20
1634
00
00
20
1631
00
00
62
1632
00
08
99
1645
00
00
21
1643
00
05
75
1642
00
00
69
1644
00
06
87
1646
00
06
30
1647
00
03
80
1649
00
00
59
1648
00
01
72
1404
00
00
20
1403
00
00
20
1390
00
04
77
1391
00
05
91
1393
00
01
45
1392
00
00
20
1388
00
00
33
1389
00
00
20
1386
00
00
20
1387
00
00
47
1385
00
00
74
1384&jkLrk
00
02
06
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3947
1379
00
00
20
1383
00
01
42
1380
00
08
73
1381
00
05
07
1368
00
02
35
1369
00
00
20
1367
00
00
38
1366
00
03
29
1363
00
02
85
1365
00
04
75
1364
00
00
20
465
00
03
21
466
00
10
58
469
00
02
19
494
00
05
82
495
00
01
61
493
00
05
83
492
00
00
20
516
00
00
20
491
00
02
73
490
00
03
04
489
00
00
63
488
00
00
20
517
00
01
87
518
00
06
44
524
00
00
20
519
00
05
30
521
00
08
39
520
00
00
20
522
00
06
40
523
00
01
33
535
00
01
56
534
00
00
20
252&fQYM psuy
00
01
63
562
00
00
46
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3948
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
564
00
00
20
563
00
05
36
566
00
02
26
567
00
00
20
565
00
02
94
570
00
02
44
569
00
00
20
571
00
09
92
591
00
00
20
572
00
02
94
590
00
08
34
589
00
00
20
586
00
06
91
587
00
04
46
/kkuk Mhg
/kkuk Mhg
/kkuk Mhg
/kkuk Mhg
/kkuk Mhg
277
00
08
80
Fkkuk uacj % 95
Fkkuk uacj % 95
Fkkuk uacj % 95
Fkkuk uacj % 95
Fkkuk uacj % 95
271
00
00
07
278
00
15
89
288
00
00
20
286
00
03
62
282
00
01
42
283
00
01
21
284
00
01
76
285
00
01
43
262
00
06
54
243
00
02
53
242
00
00
10
244
00
04
84
245
00
02
72
249
00
00
31
240
00
00
46
239
00
03
83
248
00
00
20
238
00
02
60
236
00
03
00
231
00
00
48
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3949
305
00
00
20
230
00
03
93
229
00
01
33
228
00
01
17
227
00
01
22
226
00
05
83
211
00
05
17
212
00
03
61
213
00
00
97
204&jkLrk
00
02
05
205
00
00
72
206
00
00
20
166
00
00
20
167
00
00
82
168
00
06
78
193
00
01
42
192
00
01
18
191
00
01
30
190
00
01
52
189
00
01
60
188
00
04
94
171
00
01
35
172
00
00
14
176
00
02
78
185
00
00
20
177
00
05
12
182
00
01
38
183
00
00
20
181
00
02
57
180
00
01
27
179
00
00
20
184&jkLrk
00
01
31
ikujs ds Hkqbu
ikujs ds Hkqbu
ikujs ds Hkqbu
ikujs ds Hkqbu
ikujs ds Hkqbu
216&jkLrk
00
01
29
Fkkuk uacj&93
Fkkuk uacj&93
Fkkuk uacj&93
Fkkuk uacj&93
Fkkuk uacj&93
54
00
02
14
55
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3950
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
56
00
00
20
53
00
03
25
58
00
04
60
60
00
00
20
59
00
00
20
63
00
02
29
64
00
00
61
65
00
01
41
71
00
00
21
70
00
04
11
72
00
00
20
79
00
00
20
73
00
02
18
78
00
01
45
77
00
00
86
80
00
02
20
82
00
00
29
83
00
02
94
84
00
04
19
85
00
00
20
86
00
00
99
87
00
02
25
88
00
02
89
89
00
10
90
26
00
08
91
33
00
00
20
25
00
06
27
19
00
10
45
21
00
02
55
22
00
00
20
20
00
07
19
4
00
03
10
3
00
00
20
jlqyiqj
jlqyiqj
jlqyiqj
jlqyiqj
jlqyiqj
1874
00
18
32
Fkkuk uacj % 99
Fkkuk uacj % 99
Fkkuk uacj % 99
Fkkuk uacj % 99
Fkkuk uacj % 99
1512
00
00
98
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3951
1511
00
00
20
1528&ukyk
00
01
40
1559
00
02
72
1560
00
03
33
1561
00
06
13
1558
00
00
90
1562
00
07
44
1563
00
03
78
1556
00
00
20
1564
00
02
97
1565
00
00
20
1555
00
00
90
1554
00
09
67
1553
00
05
10
1550
00
01
15
1551
00
07
37
1552
00
00
20
1599
00
00
75
1598
00
00
20
1600
00
01
37
1601
00
01
44
1602
00
00
40
1597
00
00
68
1596
00
03
10
1592
00
00
54
1595
00
03
49
1594
00
02
15
1593
00
01
84
1603
00
02
34
1604
00
05
18
1605
00
01
47
1608
00
00
94
1611
00
00
23
1610
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3952
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1622
00
02
73
1623
00
00
75
1628
00
00
20
1612
00
08
29
1613
00
01
01
1614
00
01
14
1615
00
00
20
1750
00
00
20
1749
00
05
24
1751
00
00
44
1752
00
00
26
1753
00
00
20
1748
00
06
39
1754
00
03
34
1744
00
00
40
1745
00
04
22
1755
00
00
20
1286&jkLrk
00
03
08
1038
00
00
20
1040
00
02
28
1041
00
03
52
1042
00
04
37
1043
00
08
43
1050
00
00
20
1044
00
01
76
1049
00
06
83
1048
00
02
88
1057
00
00
20
1047
00
02
81
1027
00
04
21
1026
00
04
08
1136
00
07
04
1010
00
00
20
1011
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3953
1135
00
00
35
1009
00
05
85
1008
00
01
79
1137
00
00
20
1138
00
03
00
1140
00
02
62
1007
00
00
20
1142
00
01
54
1141
00
00
99
1143
00
04
76
1149
00
03
06
1145
00
00
20
1148
00
01
40
1150
00
02
25
1147
00
02
50
1152
00
07
76
1153
00
01
25
1156
00
00
23
1208
00
01
08
1203
00
07
78
1157
00
00
20
1204
00
03
71
1200
00
05
01
1199
00
02
68
1198
00
03
26
1197
00
02
37
1194
00
01
16
1195
00
00
51
1186
00
00
20
1185
00
00
20
1184
00
00
20
1183
00
00
20
1196
00
06
59
1182
00
02
50
1181
00
02
63
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3954
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1180
00
02
45
1179
00
03
76
1175
00
03
90
1176
00
00
20
1174
00
03
49
1166
00
00
20
vklguh
vklguh
vklguh
vklguh
vklguh
4868
00
00
26
Fkkuk uacj % 7
Fkkuk uacj % 7
Fkkuk uacj % 7
Fkkuk uacj % 7
Fkkuk uacj % 7
4867
00
01
37
4866
00
01
21
4865
00
02
02
4862
00
00
50
4861
00
00
20
4864
00
04
84
4610
00
00
20
4863
00
01
79
4860
00
01
24
4859
00
03
24
4611
00
00
31
4612
00
00
20
4857
00
00
52
4858
00
03
80
4613
00
00
20
4855
00
01
36
4615
00
01
61
4853
00
00
20
4854
00
00
22
4616
00
03
67
4618
00
03
70
4617
00
06
50
4619
00
05
14
4342
00
23
12
4344
00
06
46
4345
00
00
20
4350
00
05
00
4349
00
01
52
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3955
4348
00
00
20
4351
00
04
20
4352
00
00
90
4353
00
07
44
4339&dPpk jkLrk
00
02
33
4338
00
01
41
4209
00
04
84
4210
00
05
64
4211
00
02
06
4212
00
00
23
4208
00
04
50
4207
00
00
20
4225&dPpk jkLrk
00
03
86
4213
00
00
20
4214
00
05
23
4215
00
02
78
4216
00
07
28
4221
00
01
27
4220
00
05
34
4217
00
00
20
4219
00
05
97
4229
00
00
20
4270
00
14
58
4268&jkLrk
00
02
64
4267
00
01
78
4266
00
00
20
4265
00
02
44
4264
00
01
76
4263
00
02
00
4262
00
01
48
4261
00
01
62
4260
00
04
79
4259
00
02
11
4258
00
01
32
4257
00
00
50
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3956
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
4256
00
05
73
4255
00
02
13
vrkjlu
vrkjlu
vrkjlu
vrkjlu
vrkjlu
4805
00
10
25
Fkkuk uacj % 6
Fkkuk uacj % 6
Fkkuk uacj % 6
Fkkuk uacj % 6
Fkkuk uacj % 6
4806
00
00
20
4802
00
01
27
4804&dPpk jkLrk
00
07
61
3912
00
00
41
3913
00
03
72
3914
00
02
49
3915
00
05
64
3911
00
00
20
3916
00
00
82
3910
00
03
14
3906
00
19
36
3907
00
00
20
3905
00
04
71
3918
00
00
20
3920
00
00
20
3903
00
01
87
3904
00
06
73
3923
00
01
85
3900
00
00
72
3899
00
25
54
3898
00
11
90
3961
00
07
73
3881
00
01
64
3880
00
11
76
3879
00
00
56
3882
00
06
86
3878
00
04
92
3872
00
05
13
3873
00
02
70
3869
00
06
29
3874
00
00
20
3862
00
16
75
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3957
3863
00
00
20
3847
00
00
20
3854
00
06
69
3853
00
12
49
vVMhyk
vVMhyk
vVMhyk
vVMhyk
vVMhyk
35
00
05
64
Fkkuk uacj % 101
Fkkuk uacj % 101
Fkkuk uacj % 101
Fkkuk uacj % 101
Fkkuk uacj % 101
34
00
00
30
31
00
02
79
36
00
00
20
30
00
10
76
41
00
00
20
29
00
04
31
28
00
04
45
25
00
06
24
26
00
01
98
23
00
05
31
22
00
05
11
21
00
04
89
20
00
00
20
19
00
03
78
18
00
06
40
17
00
06
49
14
00
02
61
13
00
01
03
11
00
00
20
10
00
00
20
NijkbFkh
NijkbFkh
NijkbFkh
NijkbFkh
NijkbFkh
541&ukyk
00
02
40
Fkkuk uacj % 102
Fkkuk uacj % 102
Fkkuk uacj % 102
Fkkuk uacj % 102
Fkkuk uacj % 102
542&ukyk
00
03
34
571
00
00
20
572
00
00
20
574
00
00
60
575
00
02
52
576
00
03
89
579
00
07
30
538
00
03
74
537
00
03
70
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3958
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
536
00
03
62
535
00
03
67
336
00
00
20
335
00
04
24
334
00
04
90
333
00
13
49
326
00
00
20
328
00
02
77
327
00
00
25
329
00
06
89
318
00
01
76
319
00
00
20
317
00
07
57
316
00
12
34
315
00
04
02
167
00
13
87
168
00
04
08
169
00
01
17
188
00
01
12
189
00
00
20
182
00
00
20
183
00
00
73
184
00
03
16
185
00
00
20
187
00
04
01
190
00
05
44
191
00
06
23
197
00
00
20
192
00
00
20
194
00
00
22
195
00
01
37
196
00
05
81
201
00
00
35
127
00
00
20
126
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3959
200
00
00
20
107
00
03
65
106
00
09
53
104
00
06
25
103
00
00
20
98
00
03
37
99
00
00
20
96
00
00
20
97&jkLrk
00
00
93
105&jkLrk
00
00
49
111&jkLrk
00
00
59
¹iQk- la- vkj&25011@21@2013&vksvkj&Iº
iou oqQekj] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 27th July, 2013
S.O. 1537.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that a
pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited in Dist. Saran in the State of Bihar for ‘Patna to Motihari and
Baitalpur Pipeline’ for the transportation of Petroleum Product;
And, whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary
to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which is described in the
Schedule annexed to this notification;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals
Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention
to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on
which the copies of the notification issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of
India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the
pipeline under the land, to Shri Arun Kumar Jha B.A.S. & Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited. (Pipelines
Division) P.O. Dhelwan, Sipara, Dist. Patna (Bihar.) Pin – 800020.
SCHEDULE
Dist.: Saran
State : Bihar
Mouja / Village
Survey/Block No.
Sub-Div-No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
KARANPURA
3217
00
03
23
Thana Number : 85
3216
00
01
42
3215
00
00
60
3209
00
04
55
3210
00
04
54
3211
00
08
36
3212
00
03
58
3213
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3960
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
3207
00
00
20
2343-cart track
00
00
88
2134
00
00
98
2131
00
00
20
2135
00
14
28
2136
00
01
46
2150
00
01
26
2149
00
03
18
2148
00
02
79
2146
00
01
57
2145
00
00
20
2147
00
00
20
2161
00
05
61
2162
00
00
20
2160
00
03
90
2163
00
02
28
2159
00
00
80
2164
00
06
96
2165
00
07
67
2158
00
00
20
2106
00
02
90
2166-cart track
00
01
70
2176
00
00
20
2177
00
02
44
2193
00
02
16
2194
00
06
67
2196
00
00
67
2195
00
00
20
2197
00
01
60
2198
00
00
82
2192
00
00
20
2199
00
04
52
2206
00
02
09
2200
00
00
48
2205
00
04
94
2207
00
05
49
2214
00
00
20
2212
00
00
64
2213
00
05
22
2218
00
05
91
2217
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3961
2223
00
01
04
2224
00
05
59
2225
00
00
20
2046-cart track
00
00
72
1393
00
00
20
1391
00
11
50
1390
00
01
81
1360
00
00
04
1389
00
05
16
1388
00
05
93
1383
00
00
22
1386
00
00
22
1387
00
00
20
1385
00
02
61
1384
00
03
54
1377
00
00
20
1378
00
00
20
1514
00
01
51
1466
00
01
18
1513
00
03
66
1512
00
11
05
1511
00
12
06
1510
00
01
03
1521
00
00
20
1491
00
01
20
1509
00
03
08
1508
00
05
04
1501
00
03
99
1505
00
00
20
1500
00
00
73
1499
00
03
14
1498
00
02
32
1502
00
00
20
1497
00
00
77
1526
00
19
12
1547-Road
00
02
19
3227-Canal
00
06
66
1564
00
04
97
RAMPUR
561
00
05
37
Thana Number : 87
563
00
12
44
565
00
00
18
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3962
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
566
00
15
93
623
00
03
48
596
00
07
40
622
00
03
01
595/719
00
04
26
597
00
05
97
617-Cart track
00
00
20
620
00
00
20
600
00
00
20
601
00
09
75
602-Cart track
00
01
21
LAKAT
1899-Cart track
00
00
90
CHHAPRA
1508
00
00
38
Thana Number : 89
1509
00
08
74
1510
00
03
12
1519
00
02
03
1520
00
05
87
1518
00
08
39
1515
00
00
20
1517
00
02
84
1521
00
01
22
1596
00
04
87
1525
00
01
76
1524
00
00
20
1526
00
07
08
1527
00
03
33
1528
00
00
20
1591
00
03
38
1589
00
02
17
1592
00
00
20
1587
00
00
40
1590
00
05
13
1588
00
03
36
1581
00
00
97
1609
00
03
25
1610
00
04
84
1611
00
05
61
1612
00
04
09
1613
00
03
74
1614
00
04
09
1615
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3963
1677
00
00
25
1675
00
09
92
1674
00
01
38
1628
00
01
40
1629
00
06
30
1630
00
03
58
1633
00
00
20
1634
00
00
20
1631
00
00
62
1632
00
08
99
1645
00
00
21
1643
00
05
75
1642
00
00
69
1644
00
06
87
1646
00
06
30
1647
00
03
80
1649
00
00
59
1648
00
01
72
1404
00
00
20
1403
00
00
20
1390
00
04
77
1391
00
05
91
1393
00
01
45
1392
00
00
20
1388
00
00
33
1389
00
00
20
1386
00
00
20
1387
00
00
47
1385
00
00
74
1384-Road
00
02
06
1379
00
00
20
1383
00
01
42
1380
00
08
73
1381
00
05
07
1368
00
02
35
1369
00
00
20
1367
00
00
38
1366
00
03
29
1363
00
02
85
1365
00
04
75
1364
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3964
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
465
00
03
21
466
00
10
58
469
00
02
19
494
00
05
82
495
00
01
61
493
00
05
83
492
00
00
20
516
00
00
20
491
00
02
73
490
00
03
04
489
00
00
63
488
00
00
20
517
00
01
87
518
00
06
44
524
00
00
20
519
00
05
30
521
00
08
39
520
00
00
20
522
00
06
40
523
00
01
33
535
00
01
56
534
00
00
20
252-Field Channel
00
01
63
562
00
00
46
564
00
00
20
563
00
05
36
566
00
02
26
567
00
00
20
565
00
02
94
570
00
02
44
569
00
00
20
571
00
09
92
591
00
00
20
572
00
02
94
590
00
08
34
589
00
00
20
586
00
06
91
587
00
04
46
DHANA DIH
277
00
08
80
Thana Number : 95
271
00
00
07
278
00
15
89
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3965
288
00
00
20
286
00
03
62
282
00
01
42
283
00
01
21
284
00
01
76
285
00
01
43
262
00
06
54
243
00
02
53
242
00
00
10
244
00
04
84
245
00
02
72
249
00
00
31
240
00
00
46
239
00
03
83
248
00
00
20
238
00
02
60
236
00
03
00
231
00
00
48
305
00
00
20
230
00
03
93
229
00
01
33
228
00
01
17
227
00
01
22
226
00
05
83
211
00
05
17
212
00
03
61
213
00
00
97
204-Road
00
02
05
205
00
00
72
206
00
00
20
166
00
00
20
167
00
00
82
168
00
06
78
193
00
01
42
192
00
01
18
191
00
01
30
190
00
01
52
189
00
01
60
188
00
04
94
171
00
01
35
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3966
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
172
00
00
14
176
00
02
78
185
00
00
20
177
00
05
12
182
00
01
38
183
00
00
20
181
00
02
57
180
00
01
27
179
00
00
20
184-Road
00
01
31
PANRE KE
216-Road
00
01
29
BHUIN
54
00
02
14
55
00
00
20
Thana Number : 93
56
00
00
20
53
00
03
25
58
00
04
60
60
00
00
20
59
00
00
20
63
00
02
29
64
00
00
61
65
00
01
41
71
00
00
21
70
00
04
11
72
00
00
20
79
00
00
20
73
00
02
18
78
00
01
45
77
00
00
86
80
00
02
20
82
00
00
29
83
00
02
94
84
00
04
19
85
00
00
20
86
00
00
99
87
00
02
25
88
00
02
89
89
00
10
90
26
00
08
91
33
00
00
20
25
00
06
27
19
00
10
45
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3967
21
00
02
55
22
00
00
20
20
00
07
19
4
00
03
10
3
00
00
20
RASULPUR
1874
00
18
32
Thana Number : 99
1512
00
00
98
1511
00
00
20
1528-Nala
00
01
40
1559
00
02
72
1560
00
03
33
1561
00
06
13
1558
00
00
90
1562
00
07
44
1563
00
03
78
1556
00
00
20
1564
00
02
97
1565
00
00
20
1555
00
00
90
1554
00
09
67
1553
00
05
10
1550
00
01
15
1551
00
07
37
1552
00
00
20
1599
00
00
75
1598
00
00
20
1600
00
01
37
1601
00
01
44
1602
00
00
40
1597
00
00
68
1596
00
03
10
1592
00
00
54
1595
00
03
49
1594
00
02
15
1593
00
01
84
1603
00
02
34
1604
00
05
18
1605
00
01
47
1608
00
00
94
1611
00
00
23
1610
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3968
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1622
00
02
73
1623
00
00
75
1628
00
00
20
1612
00
08
29
1613
00
01
01
1614
00
01
14
1615
00
00
20
1750
00
00
20
1749
00
05
24
1751
00
00
44
1752
00
00
26
1753
00
00
20
1748
00
06
39
1754
00
03
34
1744
00
00
40
1745
00
04
22
1755
00
00
20
1286-Road
00
03
08
1038
00
00
20
1040
00
02
28
1041
00
03
52
1042
00
04
37
1043
00
08
43
1050
00
00
20
1044
00
01
76
1049
00
06
83
1048
00
02
88
1057
00
00
20
1047
00
02
81
1027
00
04
21
1026
00
04
08
1136
00
07
04
1010
00
00
20
1011
00
00
20
1135
00
00
35
1009
00
05
85
1008
00
01
79
1137
00
00
20
1138
00
03
00
1140
00
02
62
1007
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3969
1142
00
01
54
1141
00
00
99
1143
00
04
76
1149
00
03
06
1145
00
00
20
1148
00
01
40
1150
00
02
25
1147
00
02
50
1152
00
07
76
1153
00
01
25
1156
00
00
23
1208
00
01
08
1203
00
07
78
1157
00
00
20
1204
00
03
71
1200
00
05
01
1199
00
02
68
1198
00
03
26
1197
00
02
37
1194
00
01
16
1195
00
00
51
1186
00
00
20
1185
00
00
20
1184
00
00
20
1183
00
00
20
1196
00
06
59
1182
00
02
50
1181
00
02
63
1180
00
02
45
1179
00
03
76
1175
00
03
90
1176
00
00
20
1174
00
03
49
1166
00
00
20
ASAHNI
4868
00
00
26
Thana Number : 07
4867
00
01
37
4866
00
01
21
4865
00
02
02
4862
00
00
50
4861
00
00
20
4864
00
04
84
4610
00
00
20
4863
00
01
79
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3970
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
4860
00
01
24
4859
00
03
24
4611
00
00
31
4612
00
00
20
4857
00
00
52
4858
00
03
80
4613
00
00
20
4855
00
01
36
4615
00
01
61
4853
00
00
20
4854
00
00
22
4616
00
03
67
4618
00
03
70
4617
00
06
50
4619
00
05
14
4342
00
23
12
4344
00
06
46
4345
00
00
20
4350
00
05
00
4349
00
01
52
4348
00
00
20
4351
00
04
20
4352
00
00
90
4353
00
07
44
4339-cart track
00
02
33
4338
00
01
41
4209
00
04
84
4210
00
05
64
4211
00
02
06
4212
00
00
23
4208
00
04
50
4207
00
00
20
4225- CT
00
03
86
4213
00
00
20
4214
00
05
23
4215
00
02
78
4216
00
07
28
4221
00
01
27
4220
00
05
34
4217
00
00
20
4219
00
05
97
4229
00
00
20
4270
00
14
58
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3971
4268-Road
00
02
64
4267
00
01
78
4266
00
00
20
4265
00
02
44
4264
00
01
76
4263
00
02
00
4262
00
01
48
4261
00
01
62
4260
00
04
79
4259
00
02
11
4258
00
01
32
4257
00
00
50
4256
00
05
73
4255
00
02
13
ATARSAN
4805
00
10
25
Thana Number : 06
4806
00
00
20
4802
00
01
27
4804-cart track
00
07
61
3912
00
00
41
3913
00
03
72
3914
00
02
49
3915
00
05
64
3911
00
00
20
3916
00
00
82
3910
00
03
14
3906
00
19
36
3907
00
00
20
3905
00
04
71
3918
00
00
20
3920
00
00
20
3903
00
01
87
3904
00
06
73
3923
00
01
85
3900
00
00
72
3899
00
25
54
3898
00
11
90
3961
00
07
73
3881
00
01
64
3880
00
11
76
3879
00
00
56
3882
00
06
86
3878
00
04
92
3872
00
05
13
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3972
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
3873
00
02
70
3869
00
06
29
3874
00
00
20
3862
00
16
75
3863
00
00
20
3847
00
00
20
3854
00
06
69
3853
00
12
49
ATDILA
35
00
05
64
Thana Number :
34
00
00
30
101
31
00
02
79
36
00
00
20
30
00
10
76
41
00
00
20
29
00
04
31
28
00
04
45
25
00
06
24
26
00
01
98
23
00
05
31
22
00
05
11
21
00
04
89
20
00
00
20
19
00
03
78
18
00
06
40
17
00
06
49
14
00
02
61
13
00
01
03
11
00
00
20
10
00
00
20
CHAPRAITHI
541-Nala
00
02
40
Thana Number :
542-Nala
00
03
34
102
571
00
00
20
572
00
00
20
574
00
00
60
575
00
02
52
576
00
03
89
579
00
07
30
538
00
03
74
537
00
03
70
536
00
03
62
535
00
03
67
336
00
00
20
335
00
04
24
334
00
04
90
333
00
13
49
326
00
00
20
328
00
02
77
327
00
00
25
329
00
06
89
318
00
01
76
319
00
00
20
317
00
07
57
316
00
12
34
315
00
04
02
167
00
13
87
168
00
04
08
169
00
01
17
188
00
01
12
189
00
00
20
182
00
00
20
183
00
00
73
184
00
03
16
185
00
00
20
187
00
04
01
190
00
05
44
191
00
06
23
197
00
00
20
192
00
00
20
194
00
00
22
195
00
01
37
196
00
05
81
201
00
00
35
127
00
00
20
126
00
00
20
200
00
00
20
107
00
03
65
106
00
09
53
104
00
06
25
103
00
00
20
98
00
03
37
99
00
00
20
96
00
00
20
97-Road
00
00
93
105-Road
00
00
49
111-Road
00
00
59
[F. No. R-25011/21/2013-OR-I]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3973
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
ubZ fnYyh] 27 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1538-—dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slk izrhr gksrk gS fd yksd fgr esa ;g vko';d gS fd iVuk ls eksfrgkjh vkSj csrkyiqj
rd isVªksfy;e inkFkks± ds ifjogu gsrq ftyk lkju] jkT; fcgkj esa bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkuh pkfg, A
vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slh ikbiykbu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, vko';d izrhr gksrk gS fd ml Hkwfe esa ftlds Hkhrj mDr
ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkus dk izLrko gS vkSj tks bl vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa of.kZr gS] mi;ksx dk vtZu fd;k tk,_
vr%] vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbUl (Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/dkj dk vtZu) vf/fu;e] 1962 (1962
dk 50) dh /kjk 3 dh mi/kjk (1) }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] mDr Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/dkj dk vtZu djus ds vius
vk'k; dh ?kks"k.kk djrh gSA
dksbZ O;fDr] tks mDr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa fgrc¼ gS] ml rkjh[k ls ftldks] Hkkjr ds jkti=k esa ;Fkk izdkf'kr bl
vfèklwpuk dh izfr;ka lk/kj.k turk dks miyC/ djk nh tkrh gS] bDdhl fnu ds vUnj] Hkwfe ds Hkhrj ikbiykbu fcNk, tkus gsrq mi;ksx
ds vf/dkj ds vtZu ds fy,] Jh v:.k dqekj >k] fc-iz-ls- o l{ke izkf/dkjh bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM] (ikbiykbu fMohtu)
iVuk] iks-vks- <syok] flikjk] ftyk iVuk] fiu% 800020] fcgkj dks fyf[kr :i eas vk{ksi Hkst ldsxkA
vuqlwph
ftyk % lkju
jkT; % fcgkj
ekStk@xzke
losZ@Cykd@la- (IyksV la-)
lc&Mho&la-
{ks=kiQy
gsDVs;j
vkjs
oxZ ehVj
1
2
3
4
5
6
nkmniqj
1(dsuky)
00
02
58
Fkkuk uacj&155
223
00
00
20
222
00
02
30
220
00
03
87
221
00
01
02
227
00
00
20
219
00
03
80
218
00
09
22
216
00
00
20
217
00
02
26
206
00
00
20
194
00
05
30
198
00
01
47
197
00
01
58
196
00
03
91
195
00
05
80
193
00
00
20
192
00
10
80
191
00
00
20
190
00
00
24
189
00
00
38
187(fiQYM psuy)
00
03
52
3974
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3975
383
00
04
89
389
00
00
20
384
00
04
75
385
00
06
16
388
00
13
20
387
00
00
20
435
00
00
20
436
00
05
90
437
00
10
75
438
00
00
20
449
00
04
71
448
00
09
77
447
00
03
62
453
00
00
20
445
00
04
23
444
00
00
20
446
00
23
36
460
00
00
20
461
00
01
95
471
00
00
20
469
00
23
77
468
00
00
20
530
00
04
27
529
00
00
20
528
00
08
77
531
00
00
20
532
00
02
47
533
00
06
61
523
00
00
20
534
00
06
94
539
00
06
10
535
00
00
23
538
00
00
60
537
00
01
49
536
00
00
20
546
00
00
31
545
00
00
20
547
00
10
27
549
00
18
73
557
00
03
37
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3976
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
558
00
00
20
556
00
08
39
555
00
00
20
550
00
03
34
551
00
02
96
552
00
05
63
553
00
02
03
554
00
00
82
604(dsuky)
00
02
00
605
00
00
20
7
00
00
78
606
00
03
20
607
00
01
62
608
00
00
54
tSriqj
2874
00
03
87
Fkkuk uacj&170
2875
00
06
38
2876
00
00
34
2873(fiQYM psuy)
00
01
23
2871
00
01
25
2870
00
03
17
2869
00
06
16
2868
00
11
82
2867
00
05
92
2864
00
00
20
2865
00
02
30
2866
00
04
78
2850(dPpk jkLrk)
00
01
67
2851
00
00
20
2708(fiQYM psuy)
00
01
33
2712
00
00
20
2711
00
09
96
2709
00
00
40
2714
00
00
35
2715
00
00
20
2717
00
00
20
2710
00
02
28
2702
00
00
20
2720
00
01
34
2721
00
02
23
2722
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3977
2701
00
02
48
2700
00
05
14
2699
00
01
24
2698
00
06
21
2697
00
02
51
2727(ukyk)
00
00
20
2695
00
00
20
2683
00
05
60
2696
00
12
90
2686
00
02
45
2694
00
00
50
2692
00
00
20
2687
00
03
13
2688
00
00
20
2689
00
03
09
2691
00
01
70
2690
00
01
34
2679
00
00
20
2736
00
00
48
2741
00
25
84
2678
00
02
62
2676
00
03
51
2675
00
05
12
2448(jkLrk)
00
01
08
2400
00
08
04
2401
00
00
20
2402
00
00
20
2399
00
02
27
2403
00
05
17
2433
00
02
90
2437
00
00
20
2432
00
05
53
2431
00
02
74
2430
00
00
29
2442
00
12
22
2429
00
00
20
2427
00
01
97
2426
00
04
71
2425
00
03
24
2424
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3978
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2423
00
06
31
2422
00
02
68
2420
00
00
20
2421
00
02
24
2416
00
00
51
2458
00
00
20
2459
00
03
50
2466
00
12
29
2467
00
01
99
2468
00
03
12
2469
00
02
26
2470
00
03
99
2471
00
01
55
2472
00
00
46
2473
00
00
20
2474
00
00
20
2391(ukyk)
00
01
84
2215
00
00
40
2214
00
01
41
2213
00
02
28
2212
00
02
46
2211
00
09
04
2210
00
05
77
2209
00
06
04
2208
00
02
18
2207
00
01
75
2206
00
02
65
2205
00
02
20
2200
00
03
05
2203
00
01
36
2202
00
01
44
2201
00
05
58
2197
00
09
30
2198
00
00
95
2196
00
01
82
2195
00
03
67
2193
00
05
57
2192
00
05
67
2191
00
05
93
2190
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3979
2189
00
00
20
2188
00
09
58
2187
00
08
66
2186
00
08
55
2184
00
07
71
2183
00
00
20
2185
00
05
16
2172
00
00
20
2174
00
01
50
2173
00
16
48
2170
00
00
25
2257(ukyk)
00
00
96
1419
00
03
19
1420
00
01
70
1425
00
01
90
1424
00
07
88
1430
00
03
62
1423
00
00
36
1431
00
05
40
1432
00
06
41
1433
00
00
20
1440
00
05
99
1439
00
02
48
1435
00
00
34
1438
00
02
48
1437
00
07
81
1436
00
00
49
1450(ukyk)
00
01
24
1449
00
01
63
407
00
14
13
1451(ukyk)
00
00
36
406
00
02
28
404
00
15
75
403
00
04
02
434
00
00
20
435
00
03
46
402(jkLrk)
00
01
31
400(jkLrk)
00
01
04
401(jkLrk)
00
01
42
366
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3980
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
361
00
09
07
365
00
00
58
362
00
06
54
363
00
04
82
354
00
02
43
338
00
02
31
339
00
00
20
340
00
00
20
337
00
02
55
336
00
02
49
341
00
02
95
335
00
01
39
334
00
02
64
342
00
00
20
333
00
00
83
329
00
00
20
328
00
07
66
327
00
03
38
326
00
07
51
345(jkLrk)
00
01
66
,uk;riqj
2035
00
02
01
Fkkuk uacj&156
2036
00
00
20
2034
00
00
20
2030
00
01
42
2031
00
04
41
2033
00
00
20
2032
00
01
86
2046
00
00
20
2029
00
00
39
2025
00
03
61
2024
00
05
24
2023
00
00
20
2018(ukyk)
00
01
41
ekus
1608@3345 (jkLrk)
00
01
72
Fkkuk uacj&169
1615
00
05
74
1611
00
00
20
1612
00
00
20
1614
00
04
61
1613
00
08
57
1604
00
02
23
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3981
1603
00
01
87
1602
00
02
09
1601
00
04
54
1599
00
05
02
1596
00
00
20
1598
00
03
93
1597
00
03
10
1594
00
02
37
1591
00
00
51
1592
00
01
70
1584
00
08
07
1582
00
04
97
1583
00
00
20
1576
00
03
08
1575
00
00
20
1577
00
03
53
1573
00
03
34
1572
00
02
41
1578
00
00
20
1568
00
11
67
1563
00
00
20
1569
00
00
20
1558
00
04
14
1557
00
00
25
1559
00
00
20
1560
00
02
67
1561
00
02
36
1562
00
00
41
1550
00
11
41
1551
00
01
42
1548
00
00
52
1549
00
03
56
1547
00
03
59
1546
00
04
22
1545
00
03
85
1544
00
03
85
1538
00
15
39
1445
00
00
20
1446
00
00
20
1536
00
01
17
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3982
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1537
00
00
47
1451
00
10
51
1423
00
00
20
1448
00
00
33
1449
00
06
33
1450
00
07
45
1437
00
01
80
1433
00
00
46
1434
00
08
86
1431
00
00
20
1435
00
02
00
791
00
00
20
1430
00
00
85
1429
00
04
05
792
00
03
83
793
00
00
20
810
00
07
38
811
00
06
11
812
00
02
60
815
00
01
98
816
00
10
21
817
00
00
20
806
00
00
41
824
00
03
36
836
00
03
32
837
00
00
20
835
00
00
59
838
00
03
95
839
00
03
83
854
00
12
80
857
00
01
41
856
00
08
92
859
00
08
68
710
00
54
88
863 (jkLrk)
00
02
82
866 (jkLrk)
00
02
78
920 (jsYkos)
00
07
72
921(jsYkos)
00
02
16
1285
00
04
83
1229
00
01
10
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3983
1228
00
00
20
1230
00
06
22
1233
00
08
14
1277
00
00
20
1276
00
00
20
1234
00
09
75
1237
00
00
94
1235
00
03
78
1232
00
00
20
1236
00
01
62
1218 (fiQYM psuy)
00
01
25
1214
00
00
83
1212
00
02
52
1211
00
00
67
1213
00
07
26
1148
00
00
20
1149
00
00
20
1151
00
00
20
1166
00
08
15
1165
00
07
97
1164
00
07
31
1162
00
04
79
1160
00
06
92
1161
00
00
20
1125
00
15
18
1119
00
04
90
1120
00
00
20
1118
00
03
23
1103
00
00
20
1117
00
00
20
1104
00
10
27
1105
00
05
15
1096
00
05
16
1091
00
02
92
1089
00
00
20
1090
00
02
86
1088
00
02
83
1086
00
05
47
1082
00
05
49
1080
00
04
50
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3984
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1076
00
00
20
1075
00
04
45
1065
00
07
52
1056
00
00
31
1055
00
07
77
1054
00
03
64
1046
00
08
52
1050
00
01
40
1047
00
00
57
1049
00
06
22
1048
00
02
57
1024
00
03
07
1025
00
05
20
1023
00
12
89
1027
00
11
26
1026
00
00
20
941(dsuky)
00
00
20
1019
00
00
20
1030 (dsuky)
00
01
15
gde
1065
00
01
35
Fkkuk uacj&167
1066(dsuky)
00
00
96
1067
00
08
67
1068
00
06
26
1069
00
00
20
1059
00
01
10
1058
00
00
20
1037
00
02
15
1036
00
01
58
1038
00
11
16
1039
00
02
89
1040
00
12
36
428
00
01
21
436
00
00
20
427
00
00
20
429
00
05
74
435
00
00
20
433
00
06
00
434
00
05
20
328
00
02
01
363
00
05
67
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3985
329
00
02
77
332
00
03
96
331
00
00
20
362
00
00
24
361
00
00
83
333
00
04
42
334
00
00
20
335
00
01
62
336
00
01
68
337
00
01
31
360
00
00
47
358
00
00
20
359
00
00
20
338
00
01
49
339
00
01
63
341
00
00
20
342
00
00
20
343
00
00
20
344
00
00
20
340
00
03
98
277
00
00
20
278
00
00
20
345
00
03
96
346
00
00
23
389
00
00
20
276
00
10
72
272
00
07
59
273
00
09
34
271
00
12
94
243
00
00
50
270
00
03
68
269
00
00
85
268
00
21
48
248
00
00
59
249
00
05
65
250
00
02
55
59
00
00
20
251
00
02
42
252
00
01
28
253
00
01
05
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3986
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
254
00
00
48
255
00
00
20
56
00
15
92
55
00
00
33
48
00
04
21
49
00
03
44
47
00
00
20
50
00
01
24
51
00
02
85
52
00
08
13
46
00
01
36
41
00
03
45
45
00
01
29
44
00
02
55
43
00
03
27
42
00
09
07
10
00
00
20
15
00
00
20
9
00
08
90
8
00
00
20
16
00
03
18
3
00
09
93
6
00
03
53
4
00
00
20
5
00
03
30
galjktiqj
1341
00
09
06
Fkkuk uacj&164
1342
00
09
85
1343
00
05
82
1344
00
22
13
1337
00
00
58
1345
00
17
95
1346
00
02
71
1325
00
21
75
1331
00
00
20
1328
00
07
66
1327
00
01
68
1323
00
00
20
1309
00
11
83
1308
00
01
19
1307
00
01
26
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3987
1306
00
00
82
1305
00
03
43
1291
00
00
20
1304
00
04
57
1292
00
05
79
1302
00
00
20
1301
00
04
91
1297
00
03
89
1298
00
00
52
1300
00
03
65
862
00
00
20
1299
00
00
95
323(jkLrk)
00
01
24
322(jkLrk)
00
01
18
321(jkLrk)
00
01
18
318
00
00
20
283
00
02
63
282
00
01
71
281
00
01
39
284
00
00
78
285
00
01
71
280
00
08
72
289
00
05
42
290
00
04
09
276
00
00
20
291
00
00
20
279
00
00
25
293
00
01
32
294
00
00
20
292
00
05
10
296
00
07
39
297
00
02
97
270
00
00
20
298
00
06
67
269
00
01
44
300
00
00
20
299
00
07
20
268
00
00
65
267
00
00
82
266
00
01
26
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3988
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
265
00
01
70
207
00
10
42
208
00
03
44
206
00
10
85
203
00
01
19
205
00
01
80
204
00
01
27
202
00
01
79
201
00
00
20
jktkiqj
1755
00
02
73
Fkkuk uacj&78
1812
00
01
33
1753
00
01
65
1752
00
00
24
1750
00
00
20
1749
00
00
20
1748
00
00
20
1742
00
02
53
1741
00
00
72
1740
00
00
58
1728
00
10
15
1729
00
02
83
1731
00
00
20
1730
00
05
52
1707
00
01
42
1708
00
02
95
1706
00
05
37
1705
00
00
70
1676&jkLrk
00
00
81
1675&jkLrk
00
00
93
1674&jkLrk
00
00
94
1667
00
07
36
1668
00
00
20
538
00
02
41
1666
00
03
83
541
00
01
78
542
00
02
11
1664
00
06
74
543
00
00
20
548
00
00
20
549
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3989
1655
00
03
92
1654
00
01
45
1653
00
02
08
1652
00
00
73
1638
00
03
72
1637
00
00
43
1636
00
00
47
1639
00
03
04
1635
00
02
60
1631
00
04
13
1630
00
00
20
1629
00
00
20
1628
00
03
35
1625
00
02
33
1624
00
02
38
1623
00
01
66
1622
00
01
47
1621
00
01
67
1620
00
01
73
1619
00
00
94
1618
00
00
81
1615
00
01
82
1617
00
01
27
1616
00
01
57
1614
00
05
84
1613
00
01
41
1612
00
02
05
588&jkLrk
00
02
47
591
00
03
48
828
00
02
57
592
00
01
64
813
00
00
22
814
00
00
20
827
00
03
06
826
00
03
32
825
00
06
20
832
00
00
20
833
00
00
20
840
00
05
76
839
00
01
07
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3990
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
841
00
06
96
1529
00
02
38
857
00
03
10
859
00
00
76
856
00
02
52
855
00
02
40
860
00
00
46
861
00
00
20
862
00
02
83
863
00
00
52
864
00
01
88
865
00
03
40
867
00
00
20
866
00
02
59
853
00
00
20
1521&dPpk jkLrk
00
01
56
305
00
10
15
295
00
02
00
304
00
00
83
303
00
00
54
296
00
04
31
302
00
01
73
298
00
00
85
280
00
01
22
297
00
02
07
281@1804
00
00
80
281
00
00
93
286
00
00
98
285
00
00
20
287
00
02
64
291
00
04
89
290
00
01
08
288
00
04
22
273
00
00
20
274
00
00
20
289
00
01
27
268
00
00
31
269
00
00
20
271
00
02
12
270
00
02
38
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3991
257
00
05
01
258
00
00
20
256
00
03
27
255
00
00
20
259&ukyk
00
01
10
153
00
02
97
152
00
00
20
154
00
14
86
155
00
00
20
160
00
00
20
150
00
00
20
149
00
00
20
161
00
00
54
162
00
00
75
163
00
01
01
165
00
01
45
164
00
02
33
142
00
01
51
141
00
02
59
140
00
06
94
139
00
02
61
138
00
00
20
136
00
08
27
135
00
03
18
133
00
01
96
132
00
01
57
877
00
10
85
945
00
03
85
943
00
02
67
942
00
06
01
941
00
13
29
940
00
00
36
939
00
00
20
931
00
19
56
930
00
07
46
923
00
00
20
917&ukyk
00
07
37
959&ukyk
00
06
96
46&ukyk
00
07
00
993
00
00
87
994
00
03
14
995
00
02
90
996
00
00
76
997
00
04
66
998
00
00
99
999
00
00
20
1008
00
09
77
1009
00
00
20
1007
00
01
55
1010
00
08
77
1011
00
04
93
16
00
17
56
17
00
04
75
15
00
15
79
14
00
00
20
13
00
06
65
12
00
03
38
11
00
00
64
9
00
00
20
venkjgh
1993
00
02
50
Fkkuk uacja-&79
1994
00
00
20
1989
00
03
03
1988
00
04
40
1987
00
06
56
1984
00
03
50
1982
00
04
07
1981
00
06
61
¹iQk- la- vkj&25011@21@2013&vksvkj&Iº
iou oqQekj] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 27th July, 2013
S.O. 1538.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that a
pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited in Dist. Saran in the State of Bihar for 'Patna to Motihari and
Baitalpur Pipeline' for the transportation of Petroleum Product;
And, whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary
to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which is described in the
Schedule annexed to this notification;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals
Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention
to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on
which the copies of the notification issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of
India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the
pipeline under the land, to Shri Arun Kumar Jha B.A.S. & Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited. (Pipelines
Division) P.O. Dhelwan, Sipara, Dist. Patna (Bihar.) Pin - 800020.
3992
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
SCHEDULE
Dist.: Saran
State : Bihar
Mouja / Village
Survey/Block No.
Sub-Div-No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
DAUDPUR
1(Canal)
00
02
58
Thana Number :155
223
00
00
20
222
00
02
30
220
00
03
87
221
00
01
02
227
00
00
20
219
00
03
80
218
00
09
22
216
00
00
20
217
00
02
26
206
00
00
20
194
00
05
30
198
00
01
47
197
00
01
58
196
00
03
91
195
00
05
80
193
00
00
20
192
00
10
80
191
00
00
20
190
00
00
24
189
00
00
38
187(Field Channel)
00
03
52
383
00
04
89
389
00
00
20
384
00
04
75
385
00
06
16
388
00
13
20
387
00
00
20
435
00
00
20
436
00
05
90
437
00
10
75
438
00
00
20
449
00
04
71
448
00
09
77
447
00
03
62
453
00
00
20
445
00
04
23
444
00
00
20
446
00
23
36
460
00
00
20
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3993
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3994
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
461
00
01
95
471
00
00
20
469
00
23
77
468
00
00
20
530
00
04
27
529
00
00
20
528
00
08
77
531
00
00
20
532
00
02
47
533
00
06
61
523
00
00
20
534
00
06
94
539
00
06
10
535
00
00
23
538
00
00
60
537
00
01
49
536
00
00
20
546
00
00
31
545
00
00
20
547
00
10
27
549
00
18
73
557
00
03
37
558
00
00
20
556
00
08
39
555
00
00
20
550
00
03
34
551
00
02
96
552
00
05
63
553
00
02
03
554
00
00
82
604 (Canal)
00
02
00
605
00
00
20
7
00
00
78
606
00
03
20
607
00
01
62
608
00
00
54
JAITPUR
2874
00
03
87
Thana Number :170
2875
00
06
38
2876
00
00
34
2873 (Field Channel)
00
01
23
2871
00
01
25
2870
00
03
17
2869
00
06
16
2868
00
11
82
2867
00
05
92
2864
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3995
2865
00
02
30
2866
00
04
78
2850(Cart Track)
00
01
67
2851
00
00
20
2708 (Field Channel)
00
01
33
2712
00
00
20
2711
00
09
96
2709
00
00
40
2714
00
00
35
2715
00
00
20
2717
00
00
20
2710
00
02
28
2702
00
00
20
2720
00
01
34
2721
00
02
23
2722
00
00
20
2701
00
02
48
2700
00
05
14
2699
00
01
24
2698
00
06
21
2697
00
02
51
2727(Nala)
00
00
20
2695
00
00
20
2683
00
05
60
2696
00
12
90
2686
00
02
45
2694
00
00
50
2692
00
00
20
2687
00
03
13
2688
00
00
20
2689
00
03
09
2691
00
01
70
2690
00
01
34
2679
00
00
20
2736
00
00
48
2741
00
25
84
2678
00
02
62
2676
00
03
51
2675
00
05
12
2448(Road)
00
01
08
2400
00
08
04
2401
00
00
20
2402
00
00
20
2399
00
02
27
2403
00
05
17
2433
00
02
90
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3996
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2437
00
00
20
2432
00
05
53
2431
00
02
74
2430
00
00
29
2442
00
12
22
2429
00
00
20
2427
00
01
97
2426
00
04
71
2425
00
03
24
2424
00
00
20
2423
00
06
31
2422
00
02
68
2420
00
00
20
2421
00
02
24
2416
00
00
51
2458
00
00
20
2459
00
03
50
2466
00
12
29
2467
00
01
99
2468
00
03
12
2469
00
02
26
2470
00
03
99
2471
00
01
55
2472
00
00
46
2473
00
00
20
2474
00
00
20
2391(Nala)
00
01
84
2215
00
00
40
2214
00
01
41
2213
00
02
28
2212
00
02
46
2211
00
09
04
2210
00
05
77
2209
00
06
04
2208
00
02
18
2207
00
01
75
2206
00
02
65
2205
00
02
20
2200
00
03
05
2203
00
01
36
2202
00
01
44
2201
00
05
58
2197
00
09
30
2198
00
00
95
2196
00
01
82
2195
00
03
67
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3997
2193
00
05
57
2192
00
05
67
2191
00
05
93
2190
00
00
20
2189
00
00
20
2188
00
09
58
2187
00
08
66
2186
00
08
55
2184
00
07
71
2183
00
00
20
2185
00
05
16
2172
00
00
20
2174
00
01
50
2173
00
16
48
2170
00
00
25
2257(Nala)
00
00
96
1419
00
03
19
1420
00
01
70
1425
00
01
90
1424
00
07
88
1430
00
03
62
1423
00
00
36
1431
00
05
40
1432
00
06
41
1433
00
00
20
1440
00
05
99
1439
00
02
48
1435
00
00
34
1438
00
02
48
1437
00
07
81
1436
00
00
49
1450(Nala)
00
01
24
1449
00
01
63
407
00
14
13
1451(Nala)
00
00
36
406
00
02
28
404
00
15
75
403
00
04
02
434
00
00
20
435
00
03
46
402(Road)
00
01
31
400(Road)
00
01
04
401(Road)
00
01
42
366
00
00
20
361
00
09
07
365
00
00
58
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
3998
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
362
00
06
54
363
00
04
82
354
00
02
43
338
00
02
31
339
00
00
20
340
00
00
20
337
00
02
55
336
00
02
49
341
00
02
95
335
00
01
39
334
00
02
64
342
00
00
20
333
00
00
83
329
00
00
20
328
00
07
66
327
00
03
38
326
00
07
51
345(Road)
00
01
66
ENAETPUR
2035
00
02
01
Thana Number :156
2036
00
00
20
2034
00
00
20
2030
00
01
42
2031
00
04
41
2033
00
00
20
2032
00
01
86
2046
00
00
20
2029
00
00
39
2025
00
03
61
2024
00
05
24
2023
00
00
20
2018(Nala)
00
01
41
MANE NO
1608/3345 (Road)
00
01
72
Thana Number :169
1615
00
05
74
1611
00
00
20
1612
00
00
20
1614
00
04
61
1613
00
08
57
1604
00
02
23
1603
00
01
87
1602
00
02
09
1601
00
04
54
1599
00
05
02
1596
00
00
20
1598
00
03
93
1597
00
03
10
1594
00
02
37
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
3999
1591
00
00
51
1592
00
01
70
1584
00
08
07
1582
00
04
97
1583
00
00
20
1576
00
03
08
1575
00
00
20
1577
00
03
53
1573
00
03
34
1572
00
02
41
1578
00
00
20
1568
00
11
67
1563
00
00
20
1569
00
00
20
1558
00
04
14
1557
00
00
25
1559
00
00
20
1560
00
02
67
1561
00
02
36
1562
00
00
41
1550
00
11
41
1551
00
01
42
1548
00
00
52
1549
00
03
56
1547
00
03
59
1546
00
04
22
1545
00
03
85
1544
00
03
85
1538
00
15
39
1445
00
00
20
1446
00
00
20
1536
00
01
17
1537
00
00
47
1451
00
10
51
1423
00
00
20
1448
00
00
33
1449
00
06
33
1450
00
07
45
1437
00
01
80
1433
00
00
46
1434
00
08
86
1431
00
00
20
1435
00
02
00
791
00
00
20
1430
00
00
85
1429
00
04
05
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4000
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
792
00
03
83
793
00
00
20
810
00
07
38
811
00
06
11
812
00
02
60
815
00
01
98
816
00
10
21
817
00
00
20
806
00
00
41
824
00
03
36
836
00
03
32
837
00
00
20
835
00
00
59
838
00
03
95
839
00
03
83
854
00
12
80
857
00
01
41
856
00
08
92
859
00
08
68
710
00
54
88
863 (Road)
00
02
82
866 (Road)
00
02
78
920 (Railway)
00
07
72
921(Railway)
00
02
16
1285
00
04
83
1229
00
01
10
1228
00
00
20
1230
00
06
22
1233
00
08
14
1277
00
00
20
1276
00
00
20
1234
00
09
75
1237
00
00
94
1235
00
03
78
1232
00
00
20
1236
00
01
62
1218 (Field Channel)
00
01
25
1214
00
00
83
1212
00
02
52
1211
00
00
67
1213
00
07
26
1148
00
00
20
1149
00
00
20
1151
00
00
20
1166
00
08
15
1165
00
07
97
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4001
1164
00
07
31
1162
00
04
79
1160
00
06
92
1161
00
00
20
1125
00
15
18
1119
00
04
90
1120
00
00
20
1118
00
03
23
1103
00
00
20
1117
00
00
20
1104
00
10
27
1105
00
05
15
1096
00
05
16
1091
00
02
92
1089
00
00
20
1090
00
02
86
1088
00
02
83
1086
00
05
47
1082
00
05
49
1080
00
04
50
1076
00
00
20
1075
00
04
45
1065
00
07
52
1056
00
00
31
1055
00
07
77
1054
00
03
64
1046
00
08
52
1050
00
01
40
1047
00
00
57
1049
00
06
22
1048
00
02
57
1024
00
03
07
1025
00
05
20
1023
00
12
89
1027
00
11
26
1026
00
00
20
941(Canal)
00
00
20
1019
00
00
20
1030 (Canal)
00
01
15
HAKAM
1065
00
01
35
Thana Number :167
1066(Canal)
00
00
96
1067
00
08
67
1068
00
06
26
1069
00
00
20
1059
00
01
10
1058
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4002
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1037
00
02
15
1036
00
01
58
1038
00
11
16
1039
00
02
89
1040
00
12
36
428
00
01
21
436
00
00
20
427
00
00
20
429
00
05
74
435
00
00
20
433
00
06
00
434
00
05
20
328
00
02
01
363
00
05
67
329
00
02
77
332
00
03
96
331
00
00
20
362
00
00
24
361
00
00
83
333
00
04
42
334
00
00
20
335
00
01
62
336
00
01
68
337
00
01
31
360
00
00
47
358
00
00
20
359
00
00
20
338
00
01
49
339
00
01
63
341
00
00
20
342
00
00
20
343
00
00
20
344
00
00
20
340
00
03
98
277
00
00
20
278
00
00
20
345
00
03
96
346
00
00
23
389
00
00
20
276
00
10
72
272
00
07
59
273
00
09
34
271
00
12
94
243
00
00
50
270
00
03
68
269
00
00
85
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4003
268
00
21
48
248
00
00
59
249
00
05
65
250
00
02
55
59
00
00
20
251
00
02
42
252
00
01
28
253
00
01
05
254
00
00
48
255
00
00
20
56
00
15
92
55
00
00
33
48
00
04
21
49
00
03
44
47
00
00
20
50
00
01
24
51
00
02
85
52
00
08
13
46
00
01
36
41
00
03
45
45
00
01
29
44
00
02
55
43
00
03
27
42
00
09
07
10
00
00
20
15
00
00
20
9
00
08
90
8
00
00
20
16
00
03
18
3
00
09
93
6
00
03
53
4
00
00
20
5
00
03
30
HANSRAJPUR Thana Number:
1341
00
09
06
164
1342
00
09
85
1343
00
05
82
1344
00
22
13
1337
00
00
58
1345
00
17
95
1346
00
02
71
1325
00
21
75
1331
00
00
20
1328
00
07
66
1327
00
01
68
1323
00
00
20
1309
00
11
83
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4004
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1308
00
01
19
1307
00
01
26
1306
00
00
82
1305
00
03
43
1291
00
00
20
1304
00
04
57
1292
00
05
79
1302
00
00
20
1301
00
04
91
1297
00
03
89
1298
00
00
52
1300
00
03
65
862
00
00
20
1299
00
00
95
323(Road)
00
01
24
322(Road)
00
01
18
321(Road)
00
01
18
318
00
00
20
283
00
02
63
282
00
01
71
281
00
01
39
284
00
00
78
285
00
01
71
280
00
08
72
289
00
05
42
290
00
04
09
276
00
00
20
291
00
00
20
279
00
00
25
293
00
01
32
294
00
00
20
292
00
05
10
296
00
07
39
297
00
02
97
270
00
00
20
298
00
06
67
269
00
01
44
300
00
00
20
299
00
07
20
268
00
00
65
267
00
00
82
266
00
01
26
265
00
01
70
207
00
10
42
208
00
03
44
206
00
10
85
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4005
203
00
01
19
205
00
01
80
204
00
01
27
202
00
01
79
201
00
00
20
RAJAPUR
1755
00
02
73
Thana Number :78
1812
00
01
33
1753
00
01
65
1752
00
00
24
1750
00
00
20
1749
00
00
20
1748
00
00
20
1742
00
02
53
1741
00
00
72
1740
00
00
58
1728
00
10
15
1729
00
02
83
1731
00
00
20
1730
00
05
52
1707
00
01
42
1708
00
02
95
1706
00
05
37
1705
00
00
70
1676-Road
00
00
81
1675-Road
00
00
93
1674-Road
00
00
94
1667
00
07
36
1668
00
00
20
538
00
02
41
1666
00
03
83
541
00
01
78
542
00
02
11
1664
00
06
74
543
00
00
20
548
00
00
20
549
00
00
20
1655
00
03
92
1654
00
01
45
1653
00
02
08
1652
00
00
73
1638
00
03
72
1637
00
00
43
1636
00
00
47
1639
00
03
04
1635
00
02
60
1631
00
04
13
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4006
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1630
00
00
20
1629
00
00
20
1628
00
03
35
1625
00
02
33
1624
00
02
38
1623
00
01
66
1622
00
01
47
1621
00
01
67
1620
00
01
73
1619
00
00
94
1618
00
00
81
1615
00
01
82
1617
00
01
27
1616
00
01
57
1614
00
05
84
1613
00
01
41
1612
00
02
05
588-Road
00
02
47
591
00
03
48
828
00
02
57
592
00
01
64
813
00
00
22
814
00
00
20
827
00
03
06
826
00
03
32
825
00
06
20
832
00
00
20
833
00
00
20
840
00
05
76
839
00
01
07
841
00
06
96
1529
00
02
38
857
00
03
10
859
00
00
76
856
00
02
52
855
00
02
40
860
00
00
46
861
00
00
20
862
00
02
83
863
00
00
52
864
00
01
88
865
00
03
40
867
00
00
20
866
00
02
59
853
00
00
20
1521-cart track
00
01
56
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4007
305
00
10
15
295
00
02
00
304
00
00
83
303
00
00
54
296
00
04
31
302
00
01
73
298
00
00
85
280
00
01
22
297
00
02
07
281/1804
00
00
80
281
00
00
93
286
00
00
98
285
00
00
20
287
00
02
64
291
00
04
89
290
00
01
08
288
00
04
22
273
00
00
20
274
00
00
20
289
00
01
27
268
00
00
31
269
00
00
20
271
00
02
12
270
00
02
38
257
00
05
01
258
00
00
20
256
00
03
27
255
00
00
20
259-Nala
00
01
10
153
00
02
97
152
00
00
20
154
00
14
86
155
00
00
20
160
00
00
20
150
00
00
20
149
00
00
20
161
00
00
54
162
00
00
75
163
00
01
01
165
00
01
45
164
00
02
33
142
00
01
51
141
00
02
59
140
00
06
94
139
00
02
61
138
00
00
20
136
00
08
27
135
00
03
18
133
00
01
96
132
00
01
57
877
00
10
85
945
00
03
85
943
00
02
67
942
00
06
01
941
00
13
29
940
00
00
36
939
00
00
20
931
00
19
56
930
00
07
46
923
00
00
20
917-Nala
00
07
37
959-Nala
00
06
96
46-Nala
00
07
00
993
00
00
87
994
00
03
14
995
00
02
90
996
00
00
76
997
00
04
66
998
00
00
99
999
00
00
20
1008
00
09
77
1009
00
00
20
1007
00
01
55
1010
00
08
77
1011
00
04
93
16
00
17
56
17
00
04
75
15
00
15
79
14
00
00
20
13
00
06
65
12
00
03
38
11
00
00
64
9
00
00
20
AMDARHI
1993
00
02
50
Thana Number :79
1994
00
00
20
1989
00
03
03
1988
00
04
40
1987
00
06
56
1984
00
03
50
1982
00
04
07
1981
00
06
61
[F. No. R-25011/21/2013-OR-I]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
4008
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
ubZ fnYyh] 27 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1539-—dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slk izrhr gksrk gS fd yksd fgr esa ;g vko';d gS fd iVuk ls eksfrgkjh vkSj csrkyiqj rd
isVªksfy;e inkFkks± ds ifjogu gsrq ftyk floku] jkT; fcgkj esa bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkuh pkfg, A
vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slh ikbiykbu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, vko';d izrhr gksrk gS fd ml Hkwfe esa ftlds Hkhrj mDr
ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkus dk izLrko gS vkSj tks bl vf/lwpuk ls layXu vuqlwfp esa o£.kr gS] mi;ksx dk vtZu fd;k tk, A
vr% vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbUl (Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/dkj dk vtZu) vf/fu;e] 1962 (1962
dk 50) dh /kjk 3 dh mi/kjk(1) }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] mDr Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/dkj dk vtZu djus ds vius vk'k;
dh ?kks"k.kk djrh gSA
dksbZ O;fDr] tks mDr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa fgrc¼ gS] ml rkjh[k ls ftldks] Hkkjr ds jkti=k esa ;Fkk izdkf'kr bl
vfèklwpuk dh izfr;ka lk/kj.k turk dks miyC/ djk nh tkrh gS] bDdhl fnu ds vUnj] Hkwfe ds Hkhrj ikbiykbu fcNk, tkus gsrq mi;ksx
ds vf/dkj ds vtZu ds fy,] Jh v:.k dqekj >k] fc-iz-ls- o l{ke izkf/dkjh bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM] (ikbiykbu fMohtu)
iVuk] iks-vks- <syok] flikjk] ftyk iVuk] fiu% 800020] fcgkj dks fyf[kr :i eas vk{ksi Hkst ldsxkA
vuqlwph
ftyk % floku
jkT; % fcgkj
ekStk@xzke
losZ@Cykd@la- (IyksV la-)
lc&Mho&la-
{ks=kiQy
gsDVs;j
vkjs
oxZ ehVj
1
2
3
4
5
6
lgwyh
6335
00
00
59
Fkkuk uacj&366
6333
00
00
20
6334
00
13
90
5884 ¼vsl-vsp-½
00
02
71
6121
00
00
20
6122
00
10
15
6145
00
01
01
6123
00
07
35
6144
00
00
20
6143
00
02
07
6158
00
21
23
6160
00
01
03
6161
00
00
38
6170
00
02
01
6162
00
01
19
6157
00
01
40
6177
00
11
23
6178
00
00
20
6176
00
09
93
6175
00
04
75
6174
00
00
90
6181
00
03
34
6182
00
03
58
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4009
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4010
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
lgwyh
6188
00
00
20
Fkkuk uacj&366
6173
00
03
40
6183
00
01
42
6186
00
02
07
6187
00
00
20
6185
00
05
67
6184
00
06
58
2142
00
00
20
6195
00
00
49
6193
00
00
20
2069
00
01
79
2068
00
00
20
2070
00
01
97
2071
00
00
64
2072
00
03
32
2067
00
00
20
2073
00
02
69
2074
00
03
08
2076
00
00
20
2075
00
05
01
2064
00
02
00
2078
00
01
30
2079
00
01
68
2080
00
10
10
2082
00
01
48
2085
00
03
11
2084
00
07
41
2083
00
15
31
2045
00
00
20
2046
00
00
20
1982
00
04
48
1983
00
00
20
1981
00
02
25
1980
00
01
85
1979
00
07
59
1977
00
00
37
1978
00
04
85
1974
00
08
76
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4011
lgwyh
1953
00
00
20
Fkkuk uacj&366
1955
00
10
37
1971
00
00
20
1972
00
00
20
1968
00
00
78
1956
00
04
58
1964
00
01
03
1967
00
03
26
1965
00
00
20
1966
00
01
44
1303@6860¼jkLrk½
00
04
80
1927¼jkLrk½
00
00
20
1304
00
07
78
1305
00
00
20
1308@6837
00
00
77
1308@6836
00
05
27
1309
00
04
99
1310
00
02
96
1311
00
09
53
1317
00
03
47
1318
00
06
43
1319
00
05
73
1290
00
21
38
1289
00
00
34
1288
00
07
47
1287
00
00
55
1286
00
05
67
1285
00
09
68
1284
00
03
08
1282
00
00
20
1283
00
00
93
gjhgalFkkuk uacj&362
6574
00
12
80
6573
00
00
20
Qthyiwj
1532
00
09
02
Fkkuk uacj&364
1531
00
01
91
1526
00
04
35
1525
00
08
04
1519
00
09
44
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4012
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Qthyiwj
1518
00
02
23
Fkkuk uacj&364
1517
00
03
25
1513
00
08
48
1514
00
03
25
1511
00
05
15
1515
00
00
56
1509
00
14
19
1510
00
00
20
1496
00
02
50
1508
00
07
04
1499
00
04
15
1498
00
05
93
1497
00
00
63
1493
00
05
72
1474
00
03
14
1475
00
00
20
1490
00
02
04
1489
00
03
06
1488
00
06
57
1479
00
24
39
1478
00
00
79
1480
00
00
20
1552
00
05
23
1467
00
00
55
1466
00
01
76
1417
00
02
97
1427
00
36
74
1424
00
00
20
1431
00
12
14
1433
00
07
64
1432
00
03
00
1434
00
07
99
1436
00
05
65
1435
00
10
61
1364
00
00
55
1363
00
03
27
1362
00
07
99
1361
00
06
78
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4013
Qthyiwj
1359
00
00
20
Fkkuk uacj&364
1353
00
00
27
1360
00
02
46
1354
00
09
48
1341
00
28
33
1339
00
01
10
1335
00
00
20
1336
00
03
60
1181¼Mªsu½
00
02
62
c/kksuh
552
00
00
20
Fkkuk uacj- 365
551
00
04
17
549
00
06
46
550
00
09
73
546
00
00
20
545
00
00
20
544
00
14
43
543
00
00
62
531
00
01
29
[kkuiwj [kSjarh
2577
00
00
20
Fkkuk uacj&363
2576
00
11
33
2578
00
01
64
2575
00
07
87
2570
00
14
03
2569
00
11
27
2566
00
09
93
2565
00
07
78
2564
00
14
96
1280
00
00
20
1281
00
00
20
1298
00
05
21
1299
00
04
75
1302
00
01
09
1301
00
01
68
1296
00
00
20
1300
00
00
95
1310
00
04
20
1305
00
00
20
1309
00
19
40
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4014
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
[kkuiwj [kSjarh
1308
00
07
59
Fkkuk uacj&363
1313
00
12
73
1399
00
02
36
1355
00
06
58
1354
00
00
20
1356
00
00
63
1357
00
02
47
1393
00
00
20
1358
00
07
79
1359
00
04
13
1389
00
09
81
1388
00
05
59
1386
00
04
57
1387
00
00
20
1385
00
08
05
1368
00
00
20
1369
00
00
20
1384
00
11
69
1380
00
08
18
1379
00
01
18
1378
00
00
84
1467¼jkLrk½
00
01
52
1488
00
04
85
1030
00
00
20
1489
00
02
62
1029
00
01
59
1023
00
03
28
1028
00
05
85
1027
00
04
51
1026
00
00
20
1025
00
00
20
1024
00
04
79
1020
00
01
09
1048
00
13
83
1019
00
01
57
1014
00
12
15
1015
00
00
92
1018
00
00
87
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4015
[kkuiwj [kSjarh
1013
00
05
20
Fkkuk uacj&363
996¼jkLrk½
00
02
32
1012
00
02
77
1011
00
15
62
1000 ¼dsuky½
00
00
69
1010
00
03
84
1002
00
07
43
963
00
00
20
1001
00
00
72
1009
00
06
08
1008
00
00
20
1003
00
08
31
1004
00
03
59
962¼jkLrk½
00
07
60
961
00
05
67
956
00
00
25
957
00
07
08
955
00
00
20
cYyh
1112
00
03
69
Fkkuk uacj&217
1113
00
00
20
1100
00
08
52
1101
00
00
20
1099
00
08
67
1082
00
07
89
1083
00
01
54
1081
00
17
73
1080
00
00
20
1079
00
00
20
999
00
00
20
997¼jkLrk½
00
00
84
996¼jkLrk½
00
04
67
995¼jkLrk½
00
01
44
968
00
05
59
947
00
02
99
940
00
00
20
945
00
05
94
946
00
00
20
944
00
04
99
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4016
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
cYyh
940@1155
00
00
20
Fkkuk uacj&217
941
00
01
23
943
00
03
68
942
00
00
50
935
00
13
44
934
00
05
14
933
00
03
41
415¼jkLrk½
00
01
68
416
00
00
20
399
00
00
20
385¼ukyk½
00
01
85
932
00
00
20
418¼jkLrk½
00
01
07
417
00
05
54
322
00
03
63
321
00
02
61
320
00
02
35
319
00
01
24
318
00
05
52
307
00
08
17
306
00
00
20
309
00
06
90
304
00
10
06
303¼jkLrk½
00
02
40
302
00
06
63
301
00
04
29
300
00
01
22
151
00
01
70
152
00
02
85
154
00
01
64
153
00
05
06
155
00
04
90
156
00
00
20
142
00
04
33
141
00
11
68
145
00
05
30
140
00
08
08
137
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4017
96¼jkLrk½
00
02
49
74
00
03
19
77
00
03
49
78
00
03
76
76
00
00
20
82
00
03
12
79
00
07
00
80
00
05
29
72
00
00
20
81
00
01
78
14
00
35
24
42
00
01
17
41
00
05
80
39@1115
00
02
04
39
00
04
01
38
00
00
20
40
00
00
97
37
00
11
54
14
00
01
05
36
00
18
33
3
00
00
23
ljsvk
909
00
02
22
Fkkuk uacj&218
904
00
08
38
905
00
02
70
906
00
02
41
907
00
03
14
908
00
02
32
897
00
01
65
898
00
11
15
891
00
02
96
834@1334¼lUMh ukyk½
00
05
78
flaxj iÎh
512
00
08
01
Fkkuk uacj&216
508
00
00
20
513
00
03
07
511
00
18
03
514
00
00
20
510
00
00
20
515
00
12
37
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4018
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
516
00
02
07
517
00
00
20
525
00
10
98
524
00
05
28
527
00
00
20
521
00
02
63
523
00
08
71
529
00
00
70
530
00
08
82
522
00
00
20
403
00
04
31
402
00
10
22
399
00
00
20
401
00
04
79
400
00
05
82
391
00
00
20
395
00
01
06
396
00
00
20
394
00
06
53
393
00
03
34
319
00
23
52
313
00
01
48
312
00
00
20
382
00
00
36
383
00
00
20
320
00
09
04
321
00
01
46
267
00
00
20
322
00
05
29
323
00
00
29
266
00
00
66
263
00
10
72
263
00
04
38
258
00
00
20
262
00
01
89
259
00
00
20
261
00
01
50
264
00
00
42
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4019
260
00
00
20
255¼jkLrk½
00
06
05
238
00
02
78
239
00
09
57
240
00
00
20
241
00
02
83
248
00
05
26
242
00
00
20
247
00
03
12
249
00
01
47
247
00
05
34
246
00
03
89
245
00
06
04
101
00
00
20
100
00
06
86
250
00
10
05
34 ¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
01
71
30
00
03
82
31
00
01
39
28¼ukyk½
00
01
41
29¼ukyk½
00
03
41
25
00
04
25
24
00
00
80
23
00
09
89
21
00
08
94
20
00
01
49
22
00
05
61
14
00
00
20
15
00
01
18
16
00
00
20
gluiwjok
730
00
07
58
Fkkuk uacj&302
718
00
06
25
729
00
00
20
717
00
00
20
719
00
10
04
728
00
00
20
720
00
00
52
721
00
08
70
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4020
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
714
00
00
49
722
00
00
20
707
00
02
21
709
00
01
01
708
00
04
71
706
00
03
81
711
00
04
46
704
00
22
14
697
00
00
93
696
00
04
40
698
00
00
47
699
00
00
20
700
00
00
20
701
00
00
20
702
00
00
20
695
00
19
77
694
00
00
20
476
00
06
46
475
00
02
63
474
00
02
91
473
00
03
79
472
00
04
86
55
00
02
56
54
00
09
53
53
00
08
36
52
00
00
20
81
00
00
20
47
00
00
28
46
00
12
60
45
00
05
67
44
00
00
20
1 ¼jkLrk½
00
02
12
epduk
2185
00
03
07
Fkkuk uacj&214
2186
00
00
20
2184
00
00
94
2183
00
01
49
2182
00
03
77
2181
00
03
67
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4021
2180
00
00
20
2179
00
02
70
2177
00
08
03
2178
00
00
20
2161
00
02
46
2163
00
00
20
2164
00
06
14
2165
00
00
28
2160
00
02
67
2159
00
02
52
2158
00
01
45
2148
00
02
49
2147
00
02
04
2145
00
01
96
2143
00
00
20
2144
00
04
80
2135
00
00
20
2136
00
00
20
2137
00
03
57
2129
00
16
48
2128
00
17
35
1362
00
01
68
1363
00
03
45
1365
00
02
03
1366
00
02
09
1361
00
05
59
1360
00
10
40
1359
00
03
31
1357
00
03
84
1356
00
05
51
1355
00
02
20
1354
00
02
07
1318
00
02
40
1317
00
12
06
1306
00
11
21
1210 ¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
01
90
1305
00
17
88
1188 ¼jkLrk½
00
02
30
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4022
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1187
00
00
91
1157 ¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
03
07
1152
00
07
10
1151
00
01
17
1153
00
05
70
1154
00
00
20
1150
00
02
11
1149
00
00
34
1148
00
00
20
1144
00
07
67
1143
00
05
67
1141
00
00
20
1119
00
01
17
1121
00
05
33
1142
00
00
30
1122
00
04
00
1123
00
02
07
1111
00
00
65
1124
00
12
03
1110
00
00
20
1109
00
00
20
1103
00
04
82
1104
00
04
50
1101
00
02
03
1105
00
08
87
1106
00
00
20
1100
00
00
20
idkSfy;k
102
00
00
20
Fkkuk uacj&301
101
00
08
33
100
00
00
20
99
00
03
68
109
00
00
64
98
00
01
89
97
00
02
03
96
00
03
32
110
00
00
20
95
00
05
96
94
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4023
93¼jkLrk½
00
01
16
92
00
00
71
89
00
00
20
91
00
06
70
90
00
05
94
87
00
00
20
86
00
00
20
85
00
00
20
87@797
00
01
12
djkguq
2370
00
08
30
Fkkuk uacj&155
2371
00
00
50
2369
00
05
21
2367
00
05
74
2366
00
12
15
2365
00
02
40
1611
00
01
92
1612
00
04
84
1613
00
02
68
1614
00
07
80
1610
00
00
20
1626
00
11
02
1623
00
00
37
1622
00
00
20
1621
00
00
20
1624
00
01
06
1632
00
00
20
1625
00
02
42
1627
00
00
20
1628
00
00
52
1631
00
00
86
1629
00
12
29
1630
00
00
20
1588
00
00
20
1589
00
00
20
1586
00
04
29
1585
00
08
00
1584
00
02
24
1583
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4024
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1582
00
01
86
1581
00
00
32
1579
00
01
44
1457
00
00
35
1464
00
06
88
1578
00
00
20
1463
00
00
70
1465
00
06
89
1471
00
01
51
1466
00
00
20
1467
00
00
20
1470
00
10
20
1473
00
03
59
1474
00
00
56
1475
00
00
20
1497
00
06
61
1496
00
03
28
1487
00
00
46
1495
00
00
62
1494
00
00
20
1488
00
00
80
1490
00
03
02
1491
00
04
38
1493
00
09
63
1492
00
04
45
1365
00
00
37
1366
00
03
59
1368
00
00
20
1367
00
02
11
1360
00
13
07
975
00
01
48
976
00
00
20
978
00
02
92
979
00
08
96
984
00
02
14
983
00
02
09
982
00
04
44
985
00
00
30
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4025
981
00
03
42
980
00
01
25
989
00
03
35
990
00
11
60
1226
00
00
20
1197
00
03
40
1168
00
10
20
1195
00
03
19
1196
00
00
25
1194
00
06
75
1171
00
00
20
1172
00
00
83
1193
00
01
55
1173
00
06
05
1188
00
04
60
1174
00
00
36
1187
00
03
70
1177
00
00
32
1181
00
14
64
1182
00
03
22
1148
00
09
73
HkSlk [ky
1418
00
04
89
Fkkuk uacj&154
1417
00
01
09
1419
00
00
74
1416
00
01
49
1420
00
00
20
1415
00
01
92
1414
00
01
89
1421
00
00
20
1379
00
01
27
1413
00
01
18
1382
00
00
20
1381
00
00
83
1380
00
02
10
1377
00
00
42
1376
00
03
68
1375
00
04
13
1356
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4026
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1357
00
05
56
1358
00
00
20
1373
00
00
20
1354
00
00
20
1344
00
04
05
1352
00
03
19
1353
00
00
20
1345
00
00
41
1351
00
01
58
1346
00
01
63
1347
00
03
98
1337
00
00
20
1336
00
01
74
1332
00
00
48
1334
00
04
80
1333
00
05
30
1322
00
00
20
1310
00
00
20
1321
00
04
02
1320
00
04
18
1319
00
02
87
1295
00
02
21
1816
00
00
20
1817
00
09
79
1820
00
00
20
1819
00
01
53
1818
00
08
78
975
00
00
20
973
00
07
90
974
00
08
50
969
00
06
22
970
00
00
20
967
00
00
20
968
00
03
74
996
00
00
20
997
00
01
95
998
00
07
14
999
00
02
46
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4027
1001
00
06
19
1002
00
02
21
1000
00
04
49
1003
00
04
65
1004
00
00
78
853¼jkLrk½
00
01
43
1005
00
04
02
1011
00
00
20
1006
00
01
88
1007
00
00
20
909
00
04
76
908
00
00
51
907
00
02
10
906
00
05
23
905
00
06
01
904
00
00
20
1044
00
01
21
903
00
01
42
1045
00
02
29
1046
00
02
60
1047
00
02
23
902
00
04
82
899
00
03
56
898
00
00
20
901
00
01
94
900
00
05
97
872
00
06
65
895
00
00
20
873
00
05
14
875
00
00
26
874
00
00
20
876
00
01
60
870
00
00
20
739
00
23
61
740
00
00
20
674
00
01
44
673
00
01
19
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4028
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
672
00
00
20
671
00
00
20
670
00
00
20
678
00
06
19
677
00
01
13
676
00
00
20
682
00
00
20
679
00
05
23
681
00
00
66
680
00
02
83
684
00
01
11
685
00
02
33
694
00
02
96
693
00
00
20
692
00
00
20
695
00
03
76
696
00
01
91
701
00
00
20
135
00
00
20
136
00
00
20
134
00
01
63
133
00
02
76
697
00
00
20
131
00
00
20
130
00
00
20
132
00
03
08
125
00
01
81
124
00
00
20
126
00
02
01
129
00
00
38
128
00
00
20
127
00
04
61
109
00
00
52
108
00
01
18
89
00
02
07
86
00
00
36
90
00
04
29
87
00
00
20
3196—M-13
Mss. 637 to 676
4028
88
00
00
38
91
00
05
10
107
00
01
83
106
00
00
20
105
00
00
20
96
00
00
20
94
00
00
65
95
00
07
59
97
00
00
49
52
00
02
98
55
00
00
20
56
00
00
20
51
00
02
62
50
00
00
20
53
00
02
16
49
00
00
39
48
00
03
49
47
00
00
20
46
00
03
74
45
00
00
20
41
00
00
20
40
00
02
64
39
00
01
31
38
00
04
33
32
00
00
20
34
00
03
55
35
00
00
20
33
00
04
31
21
00
06
81
22
00
00
58
20
00
05
40
19
00
00
20
4
00
00
32
3
00
00
20
¹iQk- la- vkj&25011@14@2013&vksvkj&Iº
iou oqQekj] voj lfpo
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4029
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
New Delhi, the 27th July, 2013
S.O. 1539.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that a
pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited in Dist. Siwan in the State of Bihar for ‘Patna to Motihari and
Baitalpur Pipeline’ for the transportation of Petroleum Product;
And, whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary
to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which is described in the
Schedule annexed to this notification;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals
Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention
to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on
which the copies of the notification issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of
India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the
pipeline under the land, to Shri Arun Kumar Jha B.A.S. & Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited. (Pipelines
Division) P.O. Dhelwan, Sipara, Dist. Patna (Bihar.) Pin – 800020.
SCHEDULE
Dist.: Siwan
State : Bihar
Mouja / Village
Survey/BlockNo.
Sub-Div-No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
SAHULI
6335
00
00
59
Thana No-366
6333
00
00
20
6334
00
13
90
5884-SH
00
02
71
6121
00
00
20
6122
00
10
15
6145
00
01
01
6123
00
07
35
6144
00
00
20
6143
00
02
07
6158
00
21
23
6160
00
01
03
6161
00
00
38
6170
00
02
01
6162
00
01
19
6157
00
01
40
6177
00
11
23
6178
00
00
20
6176
00
09
93
6175
00
04
75
6174
00
00
90
6181
00
03
34
6182
00
03
58
6188
00
00
20
6173
00
03
40
6183
00
01
42
4030
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4031
6186
00
02
07
6187
00
00
20
6185
00
05
67
6184
00
06
58
2142
00
00
20
6195
00
00
49
6193
00
00
20
2069
00
01
79
2068
00
00
20
2070
00
01
97
2071
00
00
64
2072
00
03
32
2067
00
00
20
2073
00
02
69
2074
00
03
08
2076
00
00
20
2075
00
05
01
2064
00
02
00
2078
00
01
30
2079
00
01
68
2080
00
10
10
2082
00
01
48
2085
00
03
11
2084
00
07
41
2083
00
15
31
2045
00
00
20
2046
00
00
20
1982
00
04
48
1983
00
00
20
1981
00
02
25
1980
00
01
85
1979
00
07
59
1977
00
00
37
1978
00
04
85
1974
00
08
76
1953
00
00
20
1955
00
10
37
1971
00
00
20
1972
00
00
20
1968
00
00
78
1956
00
04
58
1964
00
01
03
1967
00
03
26
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4032
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1965
00
00
20
1966
00
01
44
1303/6860-road
00
04
80
1927-road
00
00
20
1304
00
07
78
1305
00
00
20
1308/6837
00
00
77
1308/6836
00
05
27
1309
00
04
99
1310
00
02
96
1311
00
09
53
1317
00
03
47
1318
00
06
43
1319
00
05
73
1290
00
21
38
1289
00
00
34
1288
00
07
47
1287
00
00
55
1286
00
05
67
1285
00
09
68
1284
00
03
08
1282
00
00
20
1283
00
00
93
HARIHANS
6574
00
12
80
Thana No.-362
6573
00
00
20
FAZILPUR
1532
00
09
02
Thana No.-364
1531
00
01
91
1526
00
04
35
1525
00
08
04
1519
00
09
44
1518
00
02
23
1517
00
03
25
1513
00
08
48
1514
00
03
25
1511
00
05
15
1515
00
00
56
1509
00
14
19
1510
00
00
20
1496
00
02
50
1508
00
07
04
1499
00
04
15
1498
00
05
93
1497
00
00
63
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4033
1493
00
05
72
1474
00
03
14
1475
00
00
20
1490
00
02
04
1489
00
03
06
1488
00
06
57
1479
00
24
39
1478
00
00
79
1480
00
00
20
1552
00
05
23
1467
00
00
55
1466
00
01
76
1417
00
02
97
1427
00
36
74
1424
00
00
20
1431
00
12
14
1433
00
07
64
1432
00
03
00
1434
00
07
99
1436
00
05
65
1435
00
10
61
1364
00
00
55
1363
00
03
27
1362
00
07
99
1361
00
06
78
1359
00
00
20
1353
00
00
27
1360
00
02
46
1354
00
09
48
1341
00
28
33
1339
00
01
10
1335
00
00
20
1336
00
03
60
1181-Drain
00
02
62
BADHONI
552
00
00
20
Thana No.-365
551
00
04
17
549
00
06
46
550
00
09
73
546
00
00
20
545
00
00
20
544
00
14
43
543
00
00
62
531
00
01
29
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4034
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
KHANPUR KHAIRANTI Thana No.-363
2577
00
00
20
2576
00
11
33
2578
00
01
64
2575
00
07
87
2570
00
14
03
2569
00
11
27
2566
00
09
93
2565
00
07
78
2564
00
14
96
1280
00
00
20
1281
00
00
20
1298
00
05
21
1299
00
04
75
1302
00
01
09
1301
00
01
68
1296
00
00
20
1300
00
00
95
1310
00
04
20
1305
00
00
20
1309
00
19
40
1308
00
07
59
1313
00
12
73
1399
00
02
36
1355
00
06
58
1354
00
00
20
1356
00
00
63
1357
00
02
47
1393
00
00
20
1358
00
07
79
1359
00
04
13
1389
00
09
81
1388
00
05
59
1386
00
04
57
1387
00
00
20
1385
00
08
05
1368
00
00
20
1369
00
00
20
1384
00
11
69
1380
00
08
18
1379
00
01
18
1378
00
00
84
1467-Road
00
01
52
1488
00
04
85
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4035
1030
00
00
20
1489
00
02
62
1029
00
01
59
1023
00
03
28
1028
00
05
85
1027
00
04
51
1026
00
00
20
1025
00
00
20
1024
00
04
79
1020
00
01
09
1048
00
13
83
1019
00
01
57
1014
00
12
15
1015
00
00
92
1018
00
00
87
1013
00
05
20
996-Road
00
02
32
1012
00
02
77
1011
00
15
62
1000-Canal
00
00
69
1010
00
03
84
1002
00
07
43
963
00
00
20
1001
00
00
72
1009
00
06
08
1008
00
00
20
1003
00
08
31
1004
00
03
59
962-Road
00
07
60
961
00
05
67
956
00
00
25
957
00
07
08
955
00
00
20
BALLI
1112
00
03
69
Thana No-217
1113
00
00
20
1100
00
08
52
1101
00
00
20
1099
00
08
67
1082
00
07
89
1083
00
01
54
1081
00
17
73
1080
00
00
20
1079
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4036
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
999
00
00
20
997(ROAD)
00
00
84
996(ROAD)
00
04
67
995(ROAD)
00
01
44
968
00
05
59
947
00
02
99
940
00
00
20
945
00
05
94
946
00
00
20
944
00
04
99
940/1155
00
00
20
941
00
01
23
943
00
03
68
942
00
00
50
935
00
13
44
934
00
05
14
933
00
03
41
415(ROAD)
00
01
68
416
00
00
20
399
00
00
20
385(NALA)
00
01
85
932
00
00
20
418(ROAD)
00
01
07
417
00
05
54
322
00
03
63
321
00
02
61
320
00
02
35
319
00
01
24
318
00
05
52
307
00
08
17
306
00
00
20
309
00
06
90
304
00
10
06
303(ROAD)
00
02
40
302
00
06
63
301
00
04
29
300
00
01
22
151
00
01
70
152
00
02
85
154
00
01
64
153
00
05
06
155
00
04
90
156
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4037
142
00
04
33
141
00
11
68
145
00
05
30
140
00
08
08
137
00
00
20
96(ROAD)
00
02
49
74
00
03
19
77
00
03
49
78
00
03
76
76
00
00
20
82
00
03
12
79
00
07
00
80
00
05
29
72
00
00
20
81
00
01
78
14
00
35
24
42
00
01
17
41
00
05
80
39/1115
00
02
04
39
00
04
01
38
00
00
20
40
00
00
97
37
00
11
54
14
00
01
05
36
00
18
33
3
00
00
23
SAREA
909
00
02
22
Thana No-218
904
00
08
38
905
00
02
70
906
00
02
41
907
00
03
14
908
00
02
32
897
00
01
65
898
00
11
15
891
00
02
96
834/1334 Sandi Nala
00
05
78
SINGAR PATTI
512
00
08
01
Thana No-216
508
00
00
20
513
00
03
07
511
00
18
03
514
00
00
20
510
00
00
20
515
00
12
37
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4038
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
516
00
02
07
517
00
00
20
525
00
10
98
524
00
05
28
527
00
00
20
521
00
02
63
523
00
08
71
529
00
00
70
530
00
08
82
522
00
00
20
403
00
04
31
402
00
10
22
399
00
00
20
401
00
04
79
400
00
05
82
391
00
00
20
395
00
01
06
396
00
00
20
394
00
06
53
393
00
03
34
319
00
23
52
313
00
01
48
312
00
00
20
382
00
00
36
383
00
00
20
320
00
09
04
321
00
01
46
267
00
00
20
322
00
05
29
323
00
00
29
266
00
00
66
263
00
10
72
263
00
04
38
258
00
00
20
262
00
01
89
259
00
00
20
261
00
01
50
264
00
00
42
260
00
00
20
255(ROAD)
00
06
05
238
00
02
78
239
00
09
57
240
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4039
241
00
02
83
248
00
05
26
242
00
00
20
247
00
03
12
249
00
01
47
247
00
05
34
246
00
03
89
245
00
06
04
101
00
00
20
100
00
06
86
250
00
10
05
34 (CART TRACK)
00
01
71
30
00
03
82
31
00
01
39
28(NALA)
00
01
41
29(NALA)
00
03
41
25
00
04
25
24
00
00
80
23
00
09
89
21
00
08
94
20
00
01
49
22
00
05
61
14
00
00
20
15
00
01
18
16
00
00
20
HASANPURWA
730
00
07
58
Thana No-302
718
00
06
25
729
00
00
20
717
00
00
20
719
00
10
04
728
00
00
20
720
00
00
52
721
00
08
70
714
00
00
49
722
00
00
20
707
00
02
21
709
00
01
01
708
00
04
71
706
00
03
81
711
00
04
46
704
00
22
14
697
00
00
93
696
00
04
40
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4040
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
698
00
00
47
699
00
00
20
700
00
00
20
701
00
00
20
702
00
00
20
695
00
19
77
694
00
00
20
476
00
06
46
475
00
02
63
474
00
02
91
473
00
03
79
472
00
04
86
55
00
02
56
54
00
09
53
53
00
08
36
52
00
00
20
81
00
00
20
47
00
00
28
46
00
12
60
45
00
05
67
44
00
00
20
1(ROAD)
00
02
12
MACHAKNA
2185
00
03
07
Thana No-214
2186
00
00
20
2184
00
00
94
2183
00
01
49
2182
00
03
77
2181
00
03
67
2180
00
00
20
2179
00
02
70
2177
00
08
03
2178
00
00
20
2161
00
02
46
2163
00
00
20
2164
00
06
14
2165
00
00
28
2160
00
02
67
2159
00
02
52
2158
00
01
45
2148
00
02
49
2147
00
02
04
2145
00
01
96
2143
00
00
20
2144
00
04
80
2135
00
00
20
2136
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4041
2137
00
03
57
2129
00
16
48
2128
00
17
35
1362
00
01
68
1363
00
03
45
1365
00
02
03
1366
00
02
09
1361
00
05
59
1360
00
10
40
1359
00
03
31
1357
00
03
84
1356
00
05
51
1355
00
02
20
1354
00
02
07
1318
00
02
40
1317
00
12
06
1306
00
11
21
1210 (Cart Track)
00
01
90
1305
00
17
88
1188-road
00
02
30
1187
00
00
91
1157 (Cart Track)
00
03
07
1152
00
07
10
1151
00
01
17
1153
00
05
70
1154
00
00
20
1150
00
02
11
1149
00
00
34
1148
00
00
20
1144
00
07
67
1143
00
05
67
1141
00
00
20
1119
00
01
17
1121
00
05
33
1142
00
00
30
1122
00
04
00
1123
00
02
07
1111
00
00
65
1124
00
12
03
1110
00
00
20
1109
00
00
20
1103
00
04
82
1104
00
04
50
1101
00
02
03
1105
00
08
87
1106
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4042
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1100
00
00
20
PAKOULIYA
102
00
00
20
Thana No-301
101
00
08
33
100
00
00
20
99
00
03
68
109
00
00
64
98
00
01
89
97
00
02
03
96
00
03
32
110
00
00
20
95
00
05
96
94
00
00
20
93(ROAD)
00
01
16
92
00
00
71
89
00
00
20
91
00
06
70
90
00
05
94
87
00
00
20
86
00
00
20
85
00
00
20
87/797
00
01
12
KARAHANU
2370
00
08
30
Thana No-155
2371
00
00
50
2369
00
05
21
2367
00
05
74
2366
00
12
15
2365
00
02
40
1611
00
01
92
1612
00
04
84
1613
00
02
68
1614
00
07
80
1610
00
00
20
1626
00
11
02
1623
00
00
37
1622
00
00
20
1621
00
00
20
1624
00
01
06
1632
00
00
20
1625
00
02
42
1627
00
00
20
1628
00
00
52
1631
00
00
86
1629
00
12
29
1630
00
00
20
1588
00
00
20
1589
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4043
1586
00
04
29
1585
00
08
00
1584
00
02
24
1583
00
00
20
1582
00
01
86
1581
00
00
32
1579
00
01
44
1457
00
00
35
1464
00
06
88
1578
00
00
20
1463
00
00
70
1465
00
06
89
1471
00
01
51
1466
00
00
20
1467
00
00
20
1470
00
10
20
1473
00
03
59
1474
00
00
56
1475
00
00
20
1497
00
06
61
1496
00
03
28
1487
00
00
46
1495
00
00
62
1494
00
00
20
1488
00
00
80
1490
00
03
02
1491
00
04
38
1493
00
09
63
1492
00
04
45
1365
00
00
37
1366
00
03
59
1368
00
00
20
1367
00
02
11
1360
00
13
07
975
00
01
48
976
00
00
20
978
00
02
92
979
00
08
96
984
00
02
14
983
00
02
09
982
00
04
44
985
00
00
30
981
00
03
42
980
00
01
25
989
00
03
35
990
00
11
60
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4044
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1226
00
00
20
1197
00
03
40
1168
00
10
20
1195
00
03
19
1196
00
00
25
1194
00
06
75
1171
00
00
20
1172
00
00
83
1193
00
01
55
1173
00
06
05
1188
00
04
60
1174
00
00
36
1187
00
03
70
1177
00
00
32
1181
00
14
64
1182
00
03
22
1148
00
09
73
BHAISA KHAL
1418
00
04
89
Thana No-154
1417
00
01
09
1419
00
00
74
1416
00
01
49
1420
00
00
20
1415
00
01
92
1414
00
01
89
1421
00
00
20
1379
00
01
27
1413
00
01
18
1382
00
00
20
1381
00
00
83
1380
00
02
10
1377
00
00
42
1376
00
03
68
1375
00
04
13
1356
00
00
20
1357
00
05
56
1358
00
00
20
1373
00
00
20
1354
00
00
20
1344
00
04
05
1352
00
03
19
1353
00
00
20
1345
00
00
41
1351
00
01
58
1346
00
01
63
1347
00
03
98
1337
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4045
1336
00
01
74
1332
00
00
48
1334
00
04
80
1333
00
05
30
1322
00
00
20
1310
00
00
20
1321
00
04
02
1320
00
04
18
1319
00
02
87
1295
00
02
21
1816
00
00
20
1817
00
09
79
1820
00
00
20
1819
00
01
53
1818
00
08
78
975
00
00
20
973
00
07
90
974
00
08
50
969
00
06
22
970
00
00
20
967
00
00
20
968
00
03
74
996
00
00
20
997
00
01
95
998
00
07
14
999
00
02
46
1001
00
06
19
1002
00
02
21
1000
00
04
49
1003
00
04
65
1004
00
00
78
853(ROAD)
00
01
43
1005
00
04
02
1011
00
00
20
1006
00
01
88
1007
00
00
20
909
00
04
76
908
00
00
51
907
00
02
10
906
00
05
23
905
00
06
01
904
00
00
20
1044
00
01
21
903
00
01
42
1045
00
02
29
1046
00
02
60
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4046
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1047
00
02
23
902
00
04
82
899
00
03
56
898
00
00
20
901
00
01
94
900
00
05
97
872
00
06
65
895
00
00
20
873
00
05
14
875
00
00
26
874
00
00
20
876
00
01
60
870
00
00
20
739
00
23
61
740
00
00
20
674
00
01
44
673
00
01
19
672
00
00
20
671
00
00
20
670
00
00
20
678
00
06
19
677
00
01
13
676
00
00
20
682
00
00
20
679
00
05
23
681
00
00
66
680
00
02
83
684
00
01
11
685
00
02
33
694
00
02
96
693
00
00
20
692
00
00
20
695
00
03
76
696
00
01
91
701
00
00
20
135
00
00
20
136
00
00
20
134
00
01
63
133
00
02
76
697
00
00
20
131
00
00
20
130
00
00
20
132
00
03
08
125
00
01
81
124
00
00
20
126
00
02
01
129
00
00
38
128
00
00
20
127
00
04
61
109
00
00
52
108
00
01
18
89
00
02
07
86
00
00
36
90
00
04
29
87
00
00
20
88
00
00
38
91
00
05
10
107
00
01
83
106
00
00
20
105
00
00
20
96
00
00
20
94
00
00
65
95
00
07
59
97
00
00
49
52
00
02
98
55
00
00
20
56
00
00
20
51
00
02
62
50
00
00
20
53
00
02
16
49
00
00
39
48
00
03
49
47
00
00
20
46
00
03
74
45
00
00
20
41
00
00
20
40
00
02
64
39
00
01
31
38
00
04
33
32
00
00
20
34
00
03
55
35
00
00
20
33
00
04
31
21
00
06
81
22
00
00
58
20
00
05
40
19
00
00
20
4
00
00
32
3
00
00
20
[F. No. R-25011/14/2013-OR-I]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4047
ubZ fnYyh] 27 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk-
dk-vk-
dk-vk-
dk-vk-
dk-vk- 1540.—dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slk izrhr gksrk gS fd yksd fgr esa ;g vko”;d gS fd iVuk ls eksfrgkjh vkSj
csrkyiqj rd isVªksfy;e inkFkksZa ds ifjogu gsrq ftyk xksikyxat] jkT; fcgkj esa bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs”ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbiykbu
fcNkbZ tkuh pkfg,A vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slh ikbiykbu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, vko”;d izrhr gksrk gS fd ml Hkwfe esa
ftlds Hkhrj mDr ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkus dk izLrko gS vkSj tks bl vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa of.kZr gS] mi;ksx dk vtZu
fd;k tk,(
vr% vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbUl ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½ vf/kfu;e] 1962 ¼1962
dk 50½ dh /kkjk 3 dh mi&/kkjk¼1½ }kjk iznÙk “kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] mDr Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/akdkj dk vtZu djus ds
vius vk”k; dh ?kks’k.kk djrh gSA
dksbZ O;fDr] tks mDr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa fgrc) gS] ml rkjh[k ls ftldks] Hkkjr ds jkti= esa ;Fkk izdkf”kr bl
vf/klwpuk dh izfr;ka lk/kkj.k turk dks miyC/k djk nh tkrh gS] bDdhl fnu ds vUnj] Hkwfe ds Hkhrj ikbiykbu fcNk, tkus gsrq
mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj ds vtZu ds fy,] Jh v:.k dqekj >k] fc-iz-ls- o l{ke izkf/kdkjh bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs”ku fyfeVsM] ¼ikbiykbu
fMohtu½ iVuk] iks-vks- <syok] flikjk] ftyk iVuk] fiu % 800020] fcgkj dks fyf[kr :i eas vk{ksi Hkst ldsxkA
vuqlwph
ftyk % xksikyxat
jkT; % fcgkj
ekStk@xzke
losZ@Cykd@la- (IyksV la-)
lc&Mho&la-
{ks=kiQy
gsDVs;j
vkjs
oxZ ehVj
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
vtch uxj
1532
00
02
49
Fkkuk uacj&238
1632
00
07
14
1533
00
00
36
1631
00
00
20
1637
00
04
97
1638
00
05
15
1639
00
00
20
1640
00
07
11
1641
00
07
70
1642 jkLrk
00
06
14
793
00
02
95
794
00
12
59
795
00
00
15
796
00
00
20
797
00
00
20
782
00
11
42
786
00
00
20
783
00
00
80
4048
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4049
vtch uxj
781
00
11
42
Fkkuk uacj&238—tkjh
780
00
08
58
770
00
06
86
771
00
00
20
769
00
08
24
695
00
05
42
694
00
03
56
693
00
04
71
696
00
00
20
689
00
04
69
688
00
05
23
687
00
10
33
686
00
09
35
682
00
13
37
683
00
00
20
663
00
10
78
662
00
01
52
661
00
00
20
chykjiqj
255
00
00
20
Fkkuk uacj&282
254
00
12
98
253
00
20
84
251
00
17
63
144
00
09
82
143
00
11
83
136
00
05
85
135
00
06
80
128
00
00
20
127
00
00
20
129
00
25
05
126
00
03
59
125
00
09
28
124
00
07
84
'kkeiqj
405
00
11
08
Fkkuk uacj&279
406 dPpk jkLrk
00
00
68
407
00
20
27
408
00
00
20
429@2114
00
03
31
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4050
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
'kkeiqj
389
00
00
20
Fkkuk uacj&279&tkjh
431
00
05
80
430
00
01
19
433
00
02
73
432
00
05
23
388
00
00
20
387
00
00
20
386
00
00
20
434
00
12
29
435
00
00
28
348
00
04
27
344
00
03
89
337
00
07
74
339
00
01
62
338
00
03
46
326
00
02
03
325
00
03
57
340
00
00
64
324
00
03
34
327
00
01
52
323
00
03
27
322
00
01
70
321
00
01
85
318
00
03
87
317
00
03
68
316
00
03
66
315
00
03
27
314
00
03
10
313
00
03
15
312
00
03
84
311
00
02
09
310
00
03
47
579
00
00
20
309
00
03
59
308
00
02
64
581
00
00
20
307
00
03
52
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4051
'kkeiqj
583
00
00
51
Fkkuk uacj&279&tkjh
580
00
00
20
306
00
03
50
584
00
01
39
302
00
02
01
585
00
02
84
301
00
00
75
588
00
02
07
589
00
02
36
590
00
02
11
297
00
00
20
591
00
03
08
296
00
02
22
295
00
02
28
294
00
02
06
293
00
00
20
292
00
02
92
94
00
04
93
93
00
05
35
92
00
04
40
88
00
03
80
87
00
04
68
86
00
06
78
698
00
00
20
708
00
00
20
85
00
03
48
64
00
04
87
63
00
03
10
709
00
00
80
721
00
02
76
722
00
02
52
723
00
04
72
61
00
00
28
729
00
05
68
58
00
00
20
57
00
00
20
56
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4052
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
'kkeiqj
55
00
00
20
Fkkuk uacj&279&tkjh
54
00
00
20
730
00
05
62
731
00
05
22
732
00
00
20
745
00
05
21
746
00
05
60
743
00
00
20
747
00
11
27
748
00
06
45
751
00
00
47
750
00
01
07
749
00
01
15
763@2126 dPpk jkLrk
00
01
46
cq?klh
2083 dPpk jkLrk
00
01
40
Fkkuk uacj&278
1985
00
06
20
2013
00
06
55
2012
00
16
43
2009
00
00
20
1988
00
07
15
2007
00
00
44
1995
00
07
21
1996
00
00
20
1994
00
05
57
1993
00
00
20
1992
00
00
20
1998
00
03
94
1997
00
13
69
1999
00
05
98
2004
00
02
45
2005
00
00
20
2000
00
01
69
2003
00
13
41
2002
00
09
45
2001
00
00
20
1678
00
12
10
1677
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4053
cq?klh
1632
00
02
96
Fkkuk uacj&278&tkjh
1681
00
03
78
1682
00
00
95
1683
00
00
20
1631
00
06
33
1627
00
08
99
1626
00
07
53
1625
00
00
20
1585
00
13
37
1584
00
02
64
1583
00
04
69
1581
00
11
00
1580
00
01
63
1579
00
01
07
1578
00
04
84
1526
00
08
73
1500
00
08
26
1499
00
08
76
1489
00
05
07
1488
00
00
64
1490
00
03
21
1491
00
00
20
1492
00
02
85
1487
00
15
52
1485
00
00
20
1486
00
00
20
1261
00
00
20
1212
00
02
29
1259
00
00
78
1260 dPpk jkLrk
00
01
21
1158 dPpk jkLrk
00
01
07
1232
00
14
66
1233
00
04
14
1234
00
03
49
1235
00
03
59
1238
00
08
26
1241
00
03
61
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4054
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
cq?klh
1243
00
03
66
Fkkuk uacj&278&tkjh
1247
00
03
60
1246
00
05
81
1249
00
01
67
1250
00
01
30
1251
00
03
40
1252
00
03
20
1253
00
03
54
1254
00
03
41
1256
00
12
04
1258
00
04
04
660
00
04
04
659
00
03
76
658
00
02
67
656
00
02
39
655
00
00
20
654
00
02
72
653
00
02
57
613
00
05
60
623
00
06
08
622
00
00
20
621
00
00
20
627
00
03
10
626
00
02
26
607
00
01
13
631
00
03
35
632
00
01
61
633
00
07
01
634
00
06
58
635
00
00
20
603
00
00
20
604
00
00
20
581 jkLrk
00
01
43
569
00
00
20
567
00
01
64
568
00
02
68
563
00
00
79
562
00
01
79
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4055
cq?klh
560
00
08
08
Fkkuk uacj&278&tkjh
559
00
00
20
561
00
02
95
lh?kokyh;k
304
00
00
97
Fkkuk uacj&365
303
00
06
06
295
00
00
31
297
00
02
03
298
00
03
00
300
00
01
96
296
00
03
75
311
00
10
53
312
00
01
59
287
00
11
17
286
00
12
30
272
00
03
64
271
00
00
20
314
00
00
20
270
00
06
99
273
00
02
57
243
00
01
90
252
00
16
76
251
00
00
20
253
00
05
37
254
00
01
61
207
00
06
76
206
00
00
20
204
00
03
10
203
00
00
20
205
00
09
20
380
00
00
20
201
00
03
95
381
00
02
25
200
00
00
85
198
00
00
20
574
00
03
45
576
00
08
35
575
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4056
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
lh?kokyh;k
577
00
02
03
Fkkuk uacj&365&tkjh
578
00
00
20
579
00
00
20
583
00
11
56
572
00
06
31
582
00
00
20
571
00
01
21
570
00
00
20
564
00
00
20
584
00
11
32
602
00
01
72
603
00
06
17
604
00
00
20
605 jkLrk
00
03
56
613
00
00
37
610
00
01
60
609
00
03
34
606
00
06
60
607
00
04
57
608
00
00
20
eaxksyiqj
1457
00
01
67
Fkkuk uacj&367
1458
00
12
64
1452
00
00
20
Hkkstiqjok
307
00
06
80
Fkkuk uacj&366
306
00
07
90
315
00
09
03
312
00
00
20
314
00
00
36
316
00
08
39
317
00
04
61
322
00
05
71
321
00
06
31
323
00
03
07
320
00
05
80
279
00
00
20
319
00
02
65
324
00
05
45
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4057
Hkkstiqjok
278
00
01
03
Fkkuk uacj&366&tkjh
325
00
09
32
277
00
03
91
326
00
00
44
276
00
07
27
275
00
00
20
265 dPpk jkLrk
00
03
92
261
00
05
99
262
00
05
67
260
00
00
67
257
00
00
39
258
00
04
92
226
00
15
13
256
00
00
20
225
00
00
20
227
00
06
43
229
00
08
23
231
00
07
99
228
00
00
20
232
00
08
32
239
00
03
97
238
00
00
98
241
00
05
01
373
00
00
20
374
00
01
34
379
00
06
63
387
00
16
77
394
00
03
23
397
00
00
20
393
00
04
20
395
00
00
20
421¼jkLrk½
00
02
02
422 ¼jkLrk½
00
01
86
423 ¼jkLrk½
00
02
50
522
00
01
54
521
00
02
00
523
00
02
00
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4058
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Hkkstiqjok
524
00
01
92
Fkkuk uacj&366&tkjh
526
00
25
74
496
00
00
20
497
00
02
21
494
00
00
20
498
00
03
77
505
00
00
20
499
00
05
61
500
00
00
20
487
00
09
52
485
00
00
20
440
00
01
29
486
00
10
60
444
00
05
39
484
00
00
20
445
00
13
94
446
00
00
20
447
00
14
31
451
00
00
20
443
00
12
05
452
00
07
34
453
00
11
23
454
00
08
86
456
00
01
08
454@549
00
01
84
458
00
10
22
459
00
02
08
462
00
01
33
460
00
08
71
Vsdusokl
484¼jkLrk½
00
04
50
Fkkuk uacj&362
515
00
02
49
516
00
09
47
517
00
00
20
512
00
08
68
513
00
00
20
514
00
00
20
511
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4059
Vsdusokl
518
00
08
56
Fkkuk uacj&362&tkjh
519
00
03
81
520
00
01
62
521
00
05
09
522
00
00
20
568
00
00
29
559
00
03
14
560
00
00
20
558
00
00
61
556
00
04
19
557
00
04
53
974 ¼jkLrk½
00
01
12
764 ¼jkLrk½
00
01
19
975 ¼jkLrk½
00
00
95
768
00
00
47
778
00
05
86
777
00
01
58
772
00
00
20
769
00
18
18
766
00
00
20
767
00
01
28
dVs[kkl
323
00
01
73
Fkkuk uacj&396
317
00
13
57
316
00
01
23
312
00
11
33
315
00
00
20
314
00
00
20
313
00
00
20
310
00
00
20
311
00
01
46
306
00
14
09
305
00
00
20
16
00
07
42
298
00
01
29
296
00
00
20
297
00
04
79
17 dPpk jkLrk
00
03
23
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4060
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
dVs[kkl
18
00
03
89
Fkkuk uacj&396
266
00
00
20
265
00
00
94
264
00
03
26
261
00
00
20
19
00
00
20
263
00
04
96
262
00
05
85
268
00
01
44
255
00
05
92
254
00
02
47
253
00
01
74
256
00
11
22
84
00
00
20
259
00
01
94
83
00
01
48
81
00
09
49
69
00
00
20
80
00
02
36
87
00
00
20
79
00
01
52
78
00
08
09
77
00
03
95
91
00
11
36
76
00
00
20
92
00
00
42
93
00
06
98
100
00
06
68
102
00
17
57
103
00
00
20
104
00
09
31
111@816
00
02
22
egEeniqj
2549 ¼jkLrk½
00
03
13
Fkkuk uacj&370
2539
00
00
20
2538
00
00
20
2540
00
01
87
2541
00
06
53
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4061
egEeniqj
2548
00
00
57
Fkkuk uacj&370&tkjh
2546
00
08
25
2547
00
00
20
2545
00
03
98
2544
00
03
60
2542
00
01
13
2535
00
00
20
2543
00
01
36
2551
00
01
67
2552
00
00
20
2534
00
10
54
2554
00
02
52
2553
00
00
20
2526
00
01
15
2555
00
03
41
2556
00
00
20
2557
00
03
55
2559
00
00
20
2524
00
12
92
2558
00
00
28
2607
00
00
20
2606
00
01
46
2608
00
00
92
2605
00
04
30
2604
00
00
41
2609
00
00
20
2610
00
00
20
2612
00
05
96
2614
00
07
40
2615
00
01
63
2618
00
00
50
2617
00
07
94
2624
00
00
46
2619
00
00
20
2620
00
00
20
2625
00
04
56
2623
00
05
46
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4062
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
egEeniqj
2621
00
00
20
Fkkuk uacj&370&tkjh
2735
00
00
20
2622
00
00
31
2626
00
05
68
2633 ¼jkLrk½
00
01
05
2732
00
14
71
2734
00
00
20
2729
00
00
20
2730
00
10
71
2728
00
01
88
2726
00
05
81
2727
00
07
92
2750
00
05
50
2749
00
08
53
2784
00
05
29
2751
00
03
19
2752
00
01
95
2753
00
00
64
2783
00
00
20
2754
00
03
52
2755
00
00
20
2780
00
00
20
2782
00
09
58
2781
00
00
72
2840
00
01
79
2841
00
07
54
2842
00
00
20
3213 dPpk jkLrk
00
01
35
2874
00
00
26
2876
00
00
20
2873
00
03
20
2872
00
04
72
2871
00
01
17
2869
00
00
99
2868
00
00
20
2870
00
05
00
2863
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4063
egEeniqj
2867
00
01
58
Fkkuk uacj&370&tkjh
2866
00
04
55
2864
00
01
39
2865
00
10
44
2861
00
03
34
3213 dPpk jkLrk
00
02
35
2858
00
00
20
2860
00
07
55
2859
00
00
20
2923
00
00
20
3317 dPpk jkLrk
00
01
05
3308
00
03
12
3307
00
02
97
3309
00
00
29
3305
00
05
29
3306
00
00
20
3304
00
02
15
3310
00
02
88
3311
00
00
20
3301
00
01
91
3297
00
00
20
3300
00
03
24
3299
00
00
20
3298
00
06
25
3290
00
05
75
3291
00
04
52
3289
00
03
26
3292
00
00
50
3280
00
00
20
3287
00
06
32
3283
00
00
20
3284
00
00
70
3286
00
08
40
3285
00
01
14
3334
00
10
88
3268
00
00
20
3335
00
09
59
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4064
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
egEeniqj
3336
00
00
20
Fkkuk uacj&370&tkjh
3267
00
11
10
3266
00
00
20
3265
00
08
46
3375
00
02
08
3380
00
03
88
3381
00
00
20
3379
00
05
95
3377
00
01
09
3384
00
04
10
3385
00
04
59
3386
00
03
55
3387
00
10
74
3388
00
08
90
3390
00
00
20
3391
00
00
20
3389
00
04
75
ihijk
316
00
04
97
Fkkuk uacj&388
319
00
07
47
321
00
00
33
312
00
00
20
322
00
04
02
323
00
05
46
318
00
00
20
324
00
02
68
325
00
00
20
326
00
00
20
303&jkLrk
00
02
69
175
00
06
69
176
00
00
20
174
00
09
95
172&vsu-vsp-28
00
08
89
173&vsu-vsp-28
00
04
67
171
00
00
55
170
00
03
76
169
00
08
04
168
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4065
ihijk
164
00
03
87
Fkkuk uacj&388&tkjh
165
00
06
33
162
00
00
20
163
00
15
76
159
00
01
97
129
00
01
83
128
00
07
76
124
00
04
38
125
00
03
44
dk'kh Vsaxjkgh
47
00
00
20
Fkkuk uacj&371
46
00
01
82
38
00
07
39
39
00
00
20
37
00
05
40
36
00
04
70
34
00
02
26
28
00
02
85
29
00
05
29
30
00
01
25
31
00
04
89
32
00
01
43
5
00
04
84
10
00
06
97
6
00
00
26
11
00
00
20
9
00
00
51
8
00
05
26
7
00
02
15
12
00
00
20
13
00
14
89
xksikyiqj
791
00
11
32
Fkkuk uacj&389
783
00
11
22
779
00
00
20
780
00
09
47
782
00
00
20
781
00
02
33
777
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4066
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
gjiqj Vsaxjkgh
2557
00
00
20
Fkkuk uacj&387
2555
00
01
30
2553
00
05
30
2554
00
00
20
2510
00
00
36
2512
00
00
20
2509
00
09
95
2508
00
01
10
2504
00
00
20
2505
00
04
12
2503
00
08
94
2496
00
14
82
2606
00
00
85
2607
00
02
49
2608
00
05
08
2609
00
04
42
2612
00
05
10
2613
00
02
34
2614
00
05
79
2611
00
04
65
2672
00
07
63
2673
00
00
20
2671
00
05
08
2670
00
11
55
2667
00
02
36
2669
00
00
20
2665
00
01
01
2666
00
04
93
2152
00
06
62
2170
00
14
49
2153
00
32
49
2159
00
11
72
490
00
00
20
489
00
04
21
492
00
00
20
487
00
01
97
488
00
03
54
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4067
gjiqj Vsaxjkgh
486
00
02
42
Fkkuk uacj&387&tkjh
497
00
03
12
483
00
00
20
498
00
03
26
501
00
01
17
502
00
00
20
482
00
00
20
481
00
03
66
480
00
04
92
470
00
02
86
479
00
00
20
472
00
05
01
473
00
02
80
476
00
00
20
474
00
01
76
471
00
00
20
475
00
15
83
453
00
00
20
602¼jkLrk½
00
02
51
603¼jkLrk½
00
00
20
601
00
05
88
604
00
07
61
608
00
01
01
609
00
00
20
605
00
00
66
606
00
01
66
607
00
03
55
612
00
05
93
611
00
02
97
610
00
02
56
628
00
02
01
626
00
07
75
627
00
00
20
636
00
06
82
637
00
04
16
638
00
03
01
647
00
05
92
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4068
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
gjiqj Vsaxjkgh
648
00
00
20
Fkkuk uacj&387&tkjh
649
00
00
20
646
00
01
40
645
00
03
32
644
00
03
16
643
00
03
29
654
00
03
69
653
00
00
20
658
00
01
82
659
00
02
08
660
00
03
77
663
00
02
65
664
00
00
72
1754
00
03
33
1753
00
01
67
1743
00
04
77
1745
00
01
41
1741
00
01
01
2877 ¼jkLrk½
00
01
36
799 ¼jkLrk½
00
02
53
2879 ¼jkLrk½
00
02
18
1523
00
12
34
1526
00
00
20
1527
00
05
63
1522
00
05
89
1529
00
06
06
1530
00
03
71
1532
00
14
53
1533
00
02
61
1504
00
01
06
1501
00
09
96
1500
00
04
36
1499
00
01
21
1555
00
00
20
1498
00
07
09
1497
00
11
22
rsankliqj
601
00
09
61
Fkkuk uacj&464
599
00
03
04
598
00
01
38
597
00
04
99
551
00
04
92
454
00
00
20
552
00
05
09
593
00
00
20
553
00
02
16
554
00
03
68
555
00
00
65
587
00
03
85
586
00
00
69
574
00
04
34
575
00
08
82
585
00
00
20
582
00
05
06
576
00
01
19
573
00
00
20
577
00
05
24
578
00
00
28
500 ¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
01
37
424&xaMd unh
00
20
60
432&xaMd unh
00
03
79
433&xaMd unh
00
04
19
431&xaMd unh
00
00
20
434&xaMd unh
00
00
72
436&xaMd unh
00
05
88
437&xaMd unh
00
02
32
438&xaMd unh
00
00
22
439&xaMd unh
00
00
20
441&xaMd unh
00
00
20
442&xaMd unh
00
00
20
466&xaMd unh
00
09
33
[Qk- la- vkj&25011@19@2013&vksvkj&I]
iou dqekj] voj lfpo
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4069
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
New Delhi, the 27th July, 2013
S.O. 1540.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that a
pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited in Dist. Gopalgunj in the State of Bihar for 'Patna to Motihari
and Baitalpur Pipeline for the transportation of Petroleum Product;
And, whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is
necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which is
described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and
Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby
declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on
which the copies of the notification issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the
Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein
for laying of the pipeline under the land, to Shri Arun Kumar Jha B.A.S. & Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation
Limited. (Pipelines Division) P.O. Dhelwan, Sipara, Dist. Patna (Bihar.) Pin-800020.
SCHEDULE
Dist.: Gopalgunj
State : Bihar
Mouja / Village
Survey/BlockNo.
Sub-Div- No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
AJBI NAGAR
1532
00
02
49
Thana Number : 283
1632
00
07
14
1533
00
00
36
1631
00
00
20
1637
00
04
97
1638
00
05
15
1639
00
00
20
1640
00
07
11
1641
00
07
70
1642-ROAD
00
06
14
793
00
02
95
794
00
12
59
795
00
00
15
796
00
00
20
797
00
00
20
782
00
11
42
786
00
00
20
783
00
00
80
781
00
11
42
780
00
08
58
770
00
06
86
771
00
00
20
769
00
08
24
695
00
05
42
694
00
03
56
693
00
04
71
4070
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4071
AJBI NAGAR
696
00
00
20
Thana Number : 283—Contd.
689
00
04
69
688
00
05
23
687
00
10
33
686
00
09
35
682
00
13
37
683
00
00
20
663
00
10
78
662
00
01
52
661
00
00
20
BILARPUR
255
00
00
20
Thana Number : 282
254
00
12
98
253
00
20
84
251
00
17
63
144
00
09
82
143
00
11
83
136
00
05
85
135
00
06
80
128
00
00
20
127
00
00
20
129
00
25
05
126
00
03
59
125
00
09
28
124
00
07
84
405
00
11
08
SHAMPUR
406
Thana Number : 279
(CART TRACK)
00
00
68
407
00
20
27
408
00
00
20
429/2114
00
03
31
389
00
00
20
431
00
05
80
430
00
01
19
433
00
02
73
432
00
05
23
388
00
00
20
387
00
00
20
386
00
00
20
434
00
12
29
435
00
00
28
348
00
04
27
344
00
03
89
337
00
07
74
339
00
01
62
338
00
03
46
326
00
02
03
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4072
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
SHAMPUR
325
00
03
57
Thana Number : 279—Contd.
340
00
00
64
324
00
03
34
327
00
01
52
323
00
03
27
322
00
01
70
321
00
01
85
318
00
03
87
317
00
03
68
316
00
03
66
315
00
03
27
314
00
03
10
313
00
03
15
312
00
03
84
311
00
02
09
310
00
03
47
579
00
00
20
309
00
03
59
308
00
02
64
581
00
00
20
307
00
03
52
583
00
00
51
580
00
00
20
306
00
03
50
584
00
01
39
302
00
02
01
585
00
02
84
301
00
00
75
588
00
02
07
589
00
02
36
590
00
02
11
297
00
00
20
591
00
03
08
296
00
02
22
295
00
02
28
294
00
02
06
293
00
00
20
292
00
02
92
94
00
04
93
93
00
05
35
92
00
04
40
88
00
03
80
87
00
04
68
86
00
06
78
698
00
00
20
708
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4073
SHAMPUR
85
00
03
48
Thana Number :279—Contd.
64
00
04
87
63
00
03
10
709
00
00
80
721
00
02
76
722
00
02
52
723
00
04
72
61
00
00
28
729
00
05
68
58
00
00
20
57
00
00
20
56
00
00
20
55
00
00
20
54
00
00
20
730
00
05
62
731
00
05
22
732
00
00
20
745
00
05
21
746
00
05
60
743
00
00
20
747
00
11
27
748
00
06
45
751
00
00
47
750
00
01
07
749
00
01
15
763/2126
(CART TRACK)
00
01
46
2083
BUDHSI
(CART TRACK)
00
01
40
Thana No. :- 278
1985
00
06
20
2013
00
06
55
2012
00
16
43
2009
00
00
20
1988
00
07
15
2007
00
00
44
1995
00
07
21
1996
00
00
20
1994
00
05
57
1993
00
00
20
1992
00
00
20
1998
00
03
94
1997
00
13
69
1999
00
05
98
2004
00
02
45
2005
00
00
20
2000
00
01
69
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4074
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
BUDHSI
2003
00
13
41
Thana No. :- 278—Contd.
2002
00
09
45
2001
00
00
20
1678
00
12
10
1677
00
00
20
1632
00
02
96
1681
00
03
78
1682
00
00
95
1683
00
00
20
1631
00
06
33
1627
00
08
99
1626
00
07
53
1625
00
00
20
1585
00
13
37
1584
00
02
64
1583
00
04
69
1581
00
11
00
1580
00
01
63
1579
00
01
07
1578
00
04
84
1526
00
08
73
1500
00
08
26
1499
00
08
76
1489
00
05
07
1488
00
00
64
1490
00
03
21
1491
00
00
20
1492
00
02
85
1487
00
15
52
1485
00
00
20
1486
00
00
20
1261
00
00
20
1212
00
02
29
1259
00
00
78
1260
(CART TRACK)
00
01
21
1158
(CART TRACK)
00
01
07
1232
00
14
66
1233
00
04
14
1234
00
03
49
1235
00
03
59
1238
00
08
26
1241
00
03
61
1243
00
03
66
1247
00
03
60
1246
00
05
81
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4075
BUDHSI
1249
00
01
67
Thana No. :- 278—Contd.
1250
00
01
30
1251
00
03
40
1252
00
03
20
1253
00
03
54
1254
00
03
41
1256
00
12
04
1258
00
04
04
660
00
04
04
659
00
03
76
658
00
02
67
656
00
02
39
655
00
00
20
654
00
02
72
653
00
02
57
613
00
05
60
623
00
06
08
622
00
00
20
621
00
00
20
627
00
03
10
626
00
02
26
607
00
01
13
631
00
03
35
632
00
01
61
633
00
07
01
634
00
06
58
635
00
00
20
603
00
00
20
604
00
00
20
581(ROAD)
00
01
43
569
00
00
20
567
00
01
64
568
00
02
68
563
00
00
79
562
00
01
79
560
00
08
08
559
00
00
20
561
00
02
95
SIDHWALIA
304
00
00
97
Thana Number :365
303
00
06
06
295
00
00
31
297
00
02
03
298
00
03
00
300
00
01
96
296
00
03
75
311
00
10
53
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4076
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
SIDHWALIA
312
00
01
59
Thana Number :365—Contd.
287
00
11
17
286
00
12
30
272
00
03
64
271
00
00
20
314
00
00
20
270
00
06
99
273
00
02
57
243
00
01
90
252
00
16
76
251
00
00
20
253
00
05
37
254
00
01
61
207
00
06
76
206
00
00
20
204
00
03
10
203
00
00
20
205
00
09
20
380
00
00
20
201
00
03
95
381
00
02
25
200
00
00
85
198
00
00
20
574
00
03
45
576
00
08
35
575
00
00
20
577
00
02
03
578
00
00
20
579
00
00
20
583
00
11
56
572
00
06
31
582
00
00
20
571
00
01
21
570
00
00
20
564
00
00
20
584
00
11
32
602
00
01
72
603
00
06
17
604
00
00
20
605(ROAD)
00
03
56
613
00
00
37
610
00
01
60
609
00
03
34
606
00
06
60
607
00
04
57
608
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4077
MANGOLPUR
1457
00
01
67
Thana Number :367
1458
00
12
64
1452
00
00
20
BHOJPURWA
307
00
06
80
Thana Number :366
306
00
07
90
315
00
09
03
312
00
00
20
314
00
00
36
316
00
08
39
317
00
04
61
322
00
05
71
321
00
06
31
323
00
03
07
320
00
05
80
279
00
00
20
319
00
02
65
324
00
05
45
278
00
01
03
325
00
09
32
277
00
03
91
326
00
00
44
276
00
07
27
275
00
00
20
265 (Cart track)
00
03
92
261
00
05
99
262
00
05
67
260
00
00
67
257
00
00
39
258
00
04
92
226
00
15
13
256
00
00
20
225
00
00
20
227
00
06
43
229
00
08
23
231
00
07
99
228
00
00
20
232
00
08
32
239
00
03
97
238
00
00
98
241
00
05
01
373
00
00
20
374
00
01
34
379
00
06
63
387
00
16
77
394
00
03
23
397
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4078
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
BHOJPURWA
393
00
04
20
Thana Number :366—Contd.
395
00
00
20
421(Road)
00
02
02
422 (Road)
00
01
86
423 (Road)
00
02
50
522
00
01
54
521
00
02
00
523
00
02
00
524
00
01
92
526
00
25
74
496
00
00
20
497
00
02
21
494
00
00
20
498
00
03
77
505
00
00
20
499
00
05
61
500
00
00
20
487
00
09
52
485
00
00
20
440
00
01
29
486
00
10
60
444
00
05
39
484
00
00
20
445
00
13
94
446
00
00
20
447
00
14
31
451
00
00
20
443
00
12
05
452
00
07
34
453
00
11
23
454
00
08
86
456
00
01
08
454/549
00
01
84
458
00
10
22
459
00
02
08
462
00
01
33
460
00
08
71
TEKNEWAS
484(ROAD)
00
04
50
Thana Number :362
515
00
02
49
516
00
09
47
517
00
00
20
512
00
08
68
513
00
00
20
514
00
00
20
511
00
00
20
518
00
08
56
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4079
TEKNEWAS
519
00
03
81
Thana Number :362—Contd.
520
00
01
62
521
00
05
09
522
00
00
20
568
00
00
29
559
00
03
14
560
00
00
20
558
00
00
61
556
00
04
19
557
00
04
53
974 (ROAD)
00
01
12
764 (ROAD)
00
01
19
975 (ROAD)
00
00
95
768
00
00
47
778
00
05
86
777
00
01
58
772
00
00
20
769
00
18
18
766
00
00
20
767
00
01
28
KATEAKHAS
323
00
01
73
Thana Number : 396
317
00
13
57
316
00
01
23
312
00
11
33
315
00
00
20
314
00
00
20
313
00
00
20
310
00
00
20
311
00
01
46
306
00
14
09
305
00
00
20
16
00
07
42
298
00
01
29
296
00
00
20
297
00
04
79
17 (Cart Track)
00
03
23
18
00
03
89
266
00
00
20
265
00
00
94
264
00
03
26
261
00
00
20
19
00
00
20
263
00
04
96
262
00
05
85
268
00
01
44
255
00
05
92
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4080
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
KATEAKHAS
254
00
02
47
Thana Number :396—Contd.
253
00
01
74
256
00
11
22
84
00
00
20
259
00
01
94
83
00
01
48
81
00
09
49
69
00
00
20
80
00
02
36
87
00
00
20
79
00
01
52
78
00
08
09
77
00
03
95
91
00
11
36
76
00
00
20
92
00
00
42
93
00
06
98
100
00
06
68
102
00
17
57
103
00
00
20
104
00
09
31
111/816
00
02
22
MAHAMMADPUR
2549 (ROAD)
00
03
13
Thana Number :370
2539
00
00
20
2538
00
00
20
2540
00
01
87
2541
00
06
53
2548
00
00
57
2546
00
08
25
2547
00
00
20
2545
00
03
98
2544
00
03
60
2542
00
01
13
2535
00
00
20
2543
00
01
36
2551
00
01
67
2552
00
00
20
2534
00
10
54
2554
00
02
52
2553
00
00
20
2526
00
01
15
2555
00
03
41
2556
00
00
20
2557
00
03
55
2559
00
00
20
2524
00
12
92
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4081
MAHAMMADPUR
2558
00
00
28
Thana Number :370
2607
00
00
20
2606
00
01
46
2608
00
00
92
2605
00
04
30
2604
00
00
41
2609
00
00
20
2610
00
00
20
2612
00
05
96
2614
00
07
40
2615
00
01
63
2618
00
00
50
2617
00
07
94
2624
00
00
46
2619
00
00
20
2620
00
00
20
2625
00
04
56
2623
00
05
46
2621
00
00
20
2735
00
00
20
2622
00
00
31
2626
00
05
68
2633 (ROAD)
00
01
05
2732
00
14
71
2734
00
00
20
2729
00
00
20
2730
00
10
71
2728
00
01
88
2726
00
05
81
2727
00
07
92
2750
00
05
50
2749
00
08
53
2784
00
05
29
2751
00
03
19
2752
00
01
95
2753
00
00
64
2783
00
00
20
2754
00
03
52
2755
00
00
20
2780
00
00
20
2782
00
09
58
2781
00
00
72
2840
00
01
79
2841
00
07
54
2842
00
00
20
3213 (CART TRACK)
00
01
35
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4082
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
MAHAMMADPUR
2874
00
00
26
Thana Number :370
2876
00
00
20
2873
00
03
20
2872
00
04
72
2871
00
01
17
2869
00
00
99
2868
00
00
20
2870
00
05
00
2863
00
00
20
2867
00
01
58
2866
00
04
55
2864
00
01
39
2865
00
10
44
2861
00
03
34
3213 (CART TRACK)
00
02
35
2858
00
00
20
2860
00
07
55
2859
00
00
20
2923
00
00
20
3317 (CART TRACK)
00
01
05
3308
00
03
12
3307
00
02
97
3309
00
00
29
3305
00
05
29
3306
00
00
20
3304
00
02
15
3310
00
02
88
3311
00
00
20
3301
00
01
91
3297
00
00
20
3300
00
03
24
3299
00
00
20
3298
00
06
25
3290
00
05
75
3291
00
04
52
3289
00
03
26
3292
00
00
50
3280
00
00
20
3287
00
06
32
3283
00
00
20
3284
00
00
70
3286
00
08
40
3285
00
01
14
3334
00
10
88
3268
00
00
20
3335
00
09
59
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4083
MAHAMMADPUR
3336
00
00
20
Thana Number :370—Contd.
3267
00
11
10
3266
00
00
20
3265
00
08
46
3375
00
02
08
3380
00
03
88
3381
00
00
20
3379
00
05
95
3377
00
01
09
3384
00
04
10
3385
00
04
59
3386
00
03
55
3387
00
10
74
3388
00
08
90
3390
00
00
20
3391
00
00
20
3389
00
04
75
PIPRA
316
00
04
97
Thana Number:388
319
00
07
47
321
00
00
33
312
00
00
20
322
00
04
02
323
00
05
46
318
00
00
20
324
00
02
68
325
00
00
20
326
00
00
20
303-Road
00
02
69
175
00
06
69
176
00
00
20
174
00
09
95
172-NH28
00
08
89
173-NH28
00
04
67
171
00
00
55
170
00
03
76
169
00
08
04
168
00
00
20
164
00
03
87
165
00
06
33
162
00
00
20
163
00
15
76
159
00
01
97
129
00
01
83
128
00
07
76
124
00
04
38
125
00
03
44
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4084
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
KASI TENGRAHI Thana Number:371
47
00
00
20
46
00
01
82
38
00
07
39
39
00
00
20
37
00
05
40
36
00
04
70
34
00
02
26
28
00
02
85
29
00
05
29
30
00
01
25
31
00
04
89
32
00
01
43
5
00
04
84
10
00
06
97
6
00
00
26
11
00
00
20
9
00
00
51
8
00
05
26
7
00
02
15
12
00
00
20
13
00
14
89
GOPALPUR
791
00
11
32
Thana Number:389
783
00
11
22
779
00
00
20
780
00
09
47
782
00
00
20
781
00
02
33
777
00
00
20
HARPUR TENGRAHI
2557
00
00
20
Thana Number: 387
2555
00
01
30
2553
00
05
30
2554
00
00
20
2510
00
00
36
2512
00
00
20
2509
00
09
95
2508
00
01
10
2504
00
00
20
2505
00
04
12
2503
00
08
94
2496
00
14
82
2606
00
00
85
2607
00
02
49
2608
00
05
08
2609
00
04
42
2612
00
05
10
2613
00
02
34
2614
00
05
79
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4085
HARPUR TENGRAHI
2611
00
04
65
Thana Number:387—Contd.
2672
00
07
63
2673
00
00
20
2671
00
05
08
2670
00
11
55
2667
00
02
36
2669
00
00
20
2665
00
01
01
2666
00
04
93
2152
00
06
62
2170
00
14
49
2153
00
32
49
2159
00
11
72
490
00
00
20
489
00
04
21
492
00
00
20
487
00
01
97
488
00
03
54
486
00
02
42
497
00
03
12
483
00
00
20
498
00
03
26
501
00
01
17
502
00
00
20
482
00
00
20
481
00
03
66
480
00
04
92
470
00
02
86
479
00
00
20
472
00
05
01
473
00
02
80
476
00
00
20
474
00
01
76
471
00
00
20
475
00
15
83
453
00
00
20
602-Road
00
02
51
603-Road
00
00
20
601
00
05
88
604
00
07
61
608
00
01
01
609
00
00
20
605
00
00
66
606
00
01
66
607
00
03
55
612
00
05
93
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4086
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
HARPUR TENGRAHI
611
00
02
97
Thana Number:387—Contd.
610
00
02
56
628
00
02
01
626
00
07
75
627
00
00
20
636
00
06
82
637
00
04
16
638
00
03
01
647
00
05
92
648
00
00
20
649
00
00
20
646
00
01
40
645
00
03
32
644
00
03
16
643
00
03
29
654
00
03
69
653
00
00
20
658
00
01
82
659
00
02
08
660
00
03
77
663
00
02
65
664
00
00
72
1754
00
03
33
1753
00
01
67
1743
00
04
77
1745
00
01
41
1741
00
01
01
2877-Road
00
01
36
799-Road
00
02
53
2879-Road
00
02
18
1523
00
12
34
1526
00
00
20
1527
00
05
63
1522
00
05
89
1529
00
06
06
1530
00
03
71
1532
00
14
53
1533
00
02
61
1504
00
01
06
1501
00
09
96
1500
00
04
36
1499
00
01
21
1555
00
00
20
1498
00
07
09
1497
00
11
22
TENDASPUR
601
00
09
61
Thana Number:464
599
00
03
04
598
00
01
38
597
00
04
99
551
00
04
92
454
00
00
20
552
00
05
09
593
00
00
20
553
00
02
16
554
00
03
68
555
00
00
65
587
00
03
85
586
00
00
69
574
00
04
34
575
00
08
82
585
00
00
20
582
00
05
06
576
00
01
19
573
00
00
20
577
00
05
24
578
00
00
28
500-Cart Track
00
01
37
424-Gandak River
00
20
60
432-Gandak River
00
03
79
433-Gandak River
00
04
19
431-Gandak River
00
00
20
434-Gandak River
00
00
72
436-Gandak River
00
05
88
437-Gandak River
00
02
32
438-Gandak River
00
00
22
439-Gandak River
00
00
20
441-Gandak River
00
00
20
442-Gandak River
00
00
20
466-Gandak River
00
09
33
[F. No. R-25011/19/2013-OR-I]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4087
4088
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Je ,oa jkstxkj ea=kky;
ubZ fnYyh] 2 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1541-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ jkmjdsyk
LVhy IykaV] lqUnjx<+ ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds
deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh;
ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] Hkqous'oj ds iapkV
(lanHkZ la[;k 76@2012) çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks
2&7&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹iQk- la- ,y&29011@21@2012&vkbZ vkj (,e)º
tksgu rksiuks] voj lfpo
MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT
New Delhi, the 2nd July, 2013
S.O. 1541.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the common award (Ref.
No. 76/2012) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal/Labour Court, Bhubaneswar now as shown in
the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the
employers in relation to the management of Rourkela
Steel Plant, Sundargarh, and their workman, which was
received by the Central Government on 2-7-2013.
[ F. No. L- 29011/21/2012-IR(M)]
JOHAN TOPNO, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-
CUM-LABOUR COURT, BHUBANESWAR
Present :Shri J. Srivastava, Presiding Officer, C.G..I.T.-
Cum-Labour, Court, Bhubaneswar
I.D. Case No. 76/2012
Date of Passing Order-13th June, 2013
Between :
The Chief Executive Officer, SAIL,
Rourkela Steel Plant, At./PO. Rourkela,
Dist. Sundargarh, (Orissa)-769 003.
...Ist Party Management
(And)
The General Secretary,
Rourkela Shramik Sangh,
Shramik Mandir, Qrs. No. D-81,
Sector-18, Rourkela-769 003.
. . .2nd Party-Union
Appearances :
None. ... For the 1st Party-Management
None. ... For the 2nd Party-Union
ORDER
Case taken up today. Both the parties are absent.
The case is today fixed for filing of statement of claim by
the 2nd Party-Union, but neither any person on behalf of
the 2nd Party-Union turned up in the court nor filed any
statement of claim, though the 2nd Party-Union was
required to file the statement of claim within fifteen days
from the date of receipt of the order of reference. This
reference was received in this Tribunal on 16-8-2012. After
waiting for expiry of the stipulated period, when no
statement of claim was filed by the 2nd Party-Union, order
for issuing notice to the 2nd Party-Union was passed on
29-10-2012 and notice was issued accordingly. But no
statement of claim was filed by the date fixed. Thereafter
on 26-12-2012 an application from the General Secretary of
the 2nd Party-Union was received through post for grant
of six weeks time to file the statement of claim. But even
after lapse of more than six week’s time, the 2nd Party-
Union did not file any statement of claim or even took
pains to come to the court to see what happended to its
application and what order were passed in the case.
However more time than prayed for was given to the 2nd
Party-Union to file its statement of claim. Now nearly
ten months time is going to expire from the date of receipt
of this reference. Hence no further time can be given to
the 2nd Party-Union to come and prosecute its case. It
will be a wanton effort for this Tribunal to keep the case
pending any more. There might be that the parties have
entered into a settlement out of the court to resolve their
dispute between themselves. Therefore it would be
expedient to close the case and pass a no-dispute award.
2. Accordingly a no-dispute award is passed and the
reference is answered on the above terms.
J. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 2 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1542-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ esVykbiQ
bafM;k ba';ksjsa'k fyfeVsM ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds
deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/ eas fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh;
ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] ua- 1] eqEcbZ ds iapkV
(lanHkZ la[;k 13@2012) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj
dks 2&7&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹iQk- la- ,y&17012@37@2011&vkbZ vkj (,e)º
tksgu rksiuks] voj lfpo
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4089
New Delhi, the 2nd July, 2013
S.O. 1542.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 13/
2012) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/
Labour Court, No. 1, Mumbai now as shown in the
Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers
in relation to the management of M/s. Metlife India
Insurance Co. Ltd., and their workman, which was received
by the Central Government on 02-07-2013.
[ F. No. L- 17012/37/2011-IR(M)]
JOHAN TOPNO, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-NO. 1
MUMBAI
Present :
JUSTICE G. S. SARRAF, Presiding Officer
Reference No. CGIT-1/13 OF 2012
Parties : Employers in relation to the management of
M/s. Metlife India Insurance Company Ltd.
And
Their workman (Shri Madhusudan Ayodhya Prasad
Tiwari)
Appearances :
For the first Party
:
Absent
For the workman
:
Absent
State
:
Maharashtra
Mumbai, dated the 3rd day of May, 2013
AWARD
1. This is reference made by the Central Government in
exercise of its powers under clause (d) of sub-section
(1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947. The terms of reference given in the
schedule are as follows :
“Whether the action of the management of
M/s. Metlife Insurance Company Limited,
Mumbai, in terminating the services of
Shri Madhusudan Ayodhya Prasad Tiwari, Sales
Manager w.e.f. 4-5-2 0 11 is legal a n d
justified? What relief the worman is entitled to?”
2. After service of notice the workman was
present on 4-5-2012 and thereafter on 20-6-2012,
6-8-2012, 28-9-2012, 1-11-2012 6-12-2012, 7-2-2013
and on each date he sought time to file statement of claim.
the workman failed to turn up on 4-4-2013 on which date
he was given last chance to file statement of claim. He
has not attended the Court today and he has not filed any
statement of claim.
3. The first party has also not appeared inspite
of service of notice.
4. In the absence of any pleading or proof the
action of the first party cannot be held to be illegal or
unjustified.
5. The workman is not entitled to any relief.
Award is passed accordingly.
JUSTICE G. S. SARRAF, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 2 tqykbZ] 2013
dk- vk- 1543-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947
(1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ
bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM] ikuhir fjiQkbujh çkstsDV ds
çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/ esa
fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|kSfxd vf/dj.k@Je
U;k;ky;] paMhx<+ ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 44@2004) dks çdkf'kr
djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 2&7&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹iQk- la- ,y&30012@24@2004&vkbZ vkj (,e)º
tksgu rksiuks] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 2nd July, 2013
S.O. 1543.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the common award (Ref.
No. 44/2004) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal/Labour Court, Chandigarh now as shown in the
Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers
in relation to the management of Indian Oil Corporation
Ltd. Panipat Refinery Porject, and their workman, which
was received by the Central Government on 2-7-2013.
[F. No. L- 30012/24/2004-IR(M)]
JOHAN TOPNO, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL
TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT-II,
CHANDIGARH
Present: Sri A.K. Rastogi, Presiding Officer
Case No. I.D.44/2004 Registered on 30-11-2004
Sh. Narender S/o Sh. Om Prakash, Village Munak,
Tehsil Charaunda, Haryana, Karnal ...Petitioner
Versus
The Executive Director, Indian Oil Corporation Limited,
Panipat Refinery Project, Baholi, Panipat. ...Respondent
APPEARANCES :
For the Workman
Sh. Raj Kaushik, Adv.
For the Management
Sh. S. Kaushal, Adv.
4090
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
AWARD
Passed on 15-5-2013
Central Government vide Notification No. L-30012/
24/2004 -IR(M)) Dated 2/11/2004, by exercising its powers
under Section 10 sub-section (1) Clause (d) and Sub
section (2A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
(hereinafter referred to as ‘Act’) has referred the
following Industrial dispute for adjudication to this
Tribunal:—
“Whether the action of the management of Indian
Oil Corporation Limited Panipat Refinery, in terminating
the services of Sh. Narinder S/o Sh. Om Prakash, Helper
Gr.-I w. e.f. 11-6-2001 is just and legal? If not to what
relief the. workman is entitled to?”
.
.
As per claim statement workman had been
appointed. as Helper Grade-I in Power and Utility
Department and he had worked under control and
supervision in Oil Refinery Bohli (Pantipat) from 1-12-
1999 to11-6-2001. Respondent refused work to him on
11-6-2001 without assigning any reason and notice and
thus terminated his service illegally and wrongfully. The
workman has completed more than 240 days service and
the respondent has violated Section 25F of the Act. The
workman has alleged the violation of Section 25N; O, G
and H also of the Act. He has prayed for his reinstatement
with continuity in service and back wages.
Claim was contested by the respondent. It was
denied that workman was the employee of the respondent
or he had worked under the supervision and control of
the respondent. According to the respondent the workman
had been engaged by Contractor who had been assigning
for supervising his work. Contractor had deputed the
workman to work and the workman worked under the
control and supervision of the contractor. Contractor was
his pay master and there is no question of terminating
the service of the workman by the respondent.
A replication was filed by the workman to
reiterate his case.
In support of his case the workman examined
himself and relied on copies of attendance-sheet marked
(A & B). On behalf of management B.S. Sallan SHRM of
the respondent was examined. After his statement the
workman did not appear since 3-12-2007 A notice sent
by registered post on 30-6-2010 returned with the postal
endorsment hat he is not available on the given address'
hence the case was ordered to proceed ex-parte against
him on 3-9-2010.
I have heard the learned counsel for the management.
The learned counsel for the management argued that the
workman has pleaded to be an employee of the respondent
but there is nothing to prove the relationship of employer
and employee between the respondent and the workman.
The alleged attendance sheet marked ‘A & B’ filed by the
workman proves nothing. There is nothing to show that
they are the copies of the record maintained by the
respondent. From the statement of the workman it is clear
that he has no appointment letter, he was not registered
with the employment exchange, he had not seen any
advertisement of the post and he had not applied for the
job, he has not been issued any interview letter and neither
was he issued any termination order. It also clear from his
statement that no deduction of Provident Fund had been
made by the management and there is no proof that he
had been paid wages by the management. Thus there is
nothing to show that the workman was in the employment
of the bank and from the evidence of management witness
it is clear that the workman had been working with the
Contractor M/s. Prakash Construction of the respondent.
I agree that there is nothing, on record to show that
the workman was the employee of the respondent. I need
not to say that as the workman has alleged the relationship
of master and servant between the respondent and himself,
the burden was on him to prove the relationship and as he
has failed in proving the relationship he has no case. I
therefore hold that the workman was not in the employment
of respondent and there was no question or terminating
his services by the respondent. The reference is
accordingly answered against the workman. Hard copy
and soft copy of the award be sent to the Central
Government for further necessary action.
ASHOK KUMAR RASTOGI, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 2 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1544-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ Hkatk
feujYl izk- fyfeVsM] dsU>ksj ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj
muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa
dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|kSfxd vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] Hkqous'oj ds
iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 37@2004)] dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh;
ljdkj dks 2&7&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹iQk- la- ,y&26012@6@2004&vkbZ vkj (,e)º
tksgu rksiuks] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 2nd July, 2013
S.O. 1544.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the common award (Ref.
No. 37/2004) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal/Labour Court, Bhubaneshwar now as shown in
the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the
employers in relation to the management of M/s. Bhanja
Minerals (P) Ltd. Keonjhar, and their workman, which
was received by the Central Government on 2-7-2013.
[F. No. L- 26012/6/2004 IR(M)]
JOHAN TOPNO, Under Secy.
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4091
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-
CUM- LABOUR COURT, BHUBANESWAR
Present:
Shri J. Srivastava, Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-cum-Labour
Court, Bhubaneswar
Industrial Dispute Case No. 37/2004
Date of Passing: Award -17th June. 2013
Between:
The Managing Director,
,
M/s, Bhanja Minerals (P) Ltd.,
At. Park Street, PO. Keonjhar, Dist. Keonjhar, ( Orissa)
...1st Party-Management.
(AND)
Their workman Shri Shri Rangadhar Patra,
S/o. Nirakar Patra, At./PO. Khendra, Via. Jhumpura,
Orissa, Keonjhar
...2nd Party- Workman.
Appearances :
Shri Sribatsa Mohap
:
For the 1st Party-
Auth. Representative
Management
None
:
For the 2nd Party-
Workman.
A WAR D
The Government of India in the Ministry of Labour
vide its letter No. L-26012/6/2004-IR(M) dated 17-5-2004
has referred an industrial dispute existing between the
employers in relation to the management of M/s. Bhanja
Minerals (P) Ltd. and their workmen in exercise of the
powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and
sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947 in respect of the following matter :
“Whether the action of the management of
M/s. Bhanja Minerals (P) Ltd., Inganijharan Iron &
Mn. Mines At/P.O. Inganijharan, Via Joda, Dist.
Keonjhar in terminating the services of Sh.
Ranghadhar Patra, S/o Nirakar Patra, At/PO.
Jhamopura, Dist. Keonjhar (Orissa) from
17-4-2001 without serving proper notice and also
without complying the provision of Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 is justified? If not, what relief the
workman is entitled to?”
2.The 2nd Party-workman in his statement of claim
has stated that he was engaged as semi-skilled worker by
the 1 st Party-Management on 5.2.1985 and was placed to
work in Inganijharan Iron Mines Area.He had worked under
the 1st Party-Management for more than 16 years
continuously without any break. During his tenure of
service he was never served with any notice or called for
any explanation for negligence or disobedience. He had
discharged his normal duties to the best of satisfaction of
his boss. Suddenly he was refused employment on
17.4.2001 without any reason. He was told by the manager
that there was no work for him and he would be called for
as and when there would be availability of work. But the
work was available and so many workers were working.
Thus the refusal of employment to the 2nd Party-workman
amounts to retrenchment. He was not served with any
notice nor was paid wages for one month in lieu of notice.
So provisions of Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes
Act are attracted in his case. Therefore, his termination is
illegal and he is entitled to be reinstated with full back
wages.
3.The 1st Party-Management has alleged in his reply
that the 2nd party-workman was working under the
contractor who had taken contract for the work from the
Management. So Shri Rangadhar Patra was not an
employee of the Management. It has further been alleged
that the 2nd Party-workman remained absent continuously
from 17-4-2001 without any intimation to the Management's
contractor. He suddenly came after more than six months
and claimed payment of gratuity from the 1st Party-
Management and then filed an application before the Asst.
Labour Commissioner (Central) for the same. The Assistant
Labour Commissioner (Central), Rourkela awarded an
amount of Rs. 6000 as gratuity to the workman who
subsequently challenged the order before the Regional
Labour Commissioner (Central), Bhubaneswar where he
admitted his retirement from service on 17-4-2001. After
hearing both the parties the Regional Labour Commissioner
(Central), Bhubaneswar being the appellate authority
passed order for payment of gratuity amounting to Rs.
14,220 along with 10% simple interest from 18-4-2001 to
the workman. The Management being the principal
employer had paid an amount of Rs. 22,705 on 23-2-2007
through bank draft which was received by the workman.
In view of the above the claim of the workman is illegal
and liable to be dismissed. The workman has not made the
sub-contractor as party to the case.
4. On the pleadings of the parties following issues
were framed :
ISSUES
1.
Whether the action of the Management of
M/s. Bhanja Minerals (P) Ltd., Inganijharan
Iron & Mn. Mines, At/PO. Inganijharan, Via.
Joda, Dist Keonjhar in terminating the services
of Shri Rangadhar Patra, S/o. Nirakar Patra,
At/PO. Jhamopura, Dist Keonjhar (Orissa)
from 17.4.2001 without serving proper notice
and also without complying the provisions of
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is justified?
2.
Whether the 2nd Party-workman has worked
for more than 240 days from the last preceding
year of termination of his service?
4092
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
3.
Whether the 2nd Party-workman is entitled
to the benefits of Section 25-F of the Industrial
Disputes Act?
4.
If not, what relief is the workman entitled
to?
5. The 2nd Party-workman except on 6.7.2005
never appeared before this Tribunal Labour Court. He
even sent his statement of claim through post on 8.5.2006.
He was given every chance to appear and contest the case,
but he never appeared as except on one date as stated
above. Therefore, the case was ultimately set exparte
against him on 16.1.2012.
6. The 1st Party-Management contested the case
and filed sworn affidavit of Shri Sribatsa Kumar Mohapatra
in evidence along with photostat copies of two documents.
FINDINGS
ISSUE NO. 1
7. Since the burden to prove this issue lies on the
2nd Party- workman and he has not discharged his burden,
it cannot be believed against the pleadings of the 1st Party-
Management that he was an employee of the 1st party-
Management and he was terminated from service with effect
from 17.4.2001 without taking re-course to the relevant
provisions of law made under the Industrial Disputes Act,
1947. The 1st Party-Management has categorically stated
in its pleadings that the 2nd Party-workman had admitted
his retirement from service on 17.4.2001 before the Regional
Labour Commissioner (Central), Bhubaneswar as is
reflected in the order passed by him on 23.1.2007 copy of
which has been annexed as Annexure-l to the affidavit of
Shri Sribatsa Kumar Mohapatra. Therefore, it is very much
doubtful that he was terminated from service by the 1st
Party-Management on 17.4.2001. Had the 2nd Party-
workman retired on 17.4.2001 he cannot be said to have
been terminated by the 1st Party- Management and in that
case retrenchment com~pensation under Section 25- F of
the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is not required to be
paid, Therefore the alleged action of the Management
regarding termination of the 2nd Party-workman from
service cannot be made a matter of dispute. This issue
thus decided against the 2nd Party-workman.
ISSUE NOS. 2 & 3
8. Since both the issues are co-related they are
taken up together for convenience sake.
9. The burden to prove these issues also lies on the
2nd Party-workman. But he has failed to adduce any
documentary or oral evidence in support of his claim of
having worked with the 1 st Party- Management for more
than 16 years or at least 240 days from the last preceding
year of alleged termination of his service. The 2nd Party-
workman has not dared to come to the witness box to
prove his allegations. On the other hand, the 1st Party-
Management has stated that the 2nd party-workman was
a contract worker, and not a direct employee of the 1st
Party-Management and this fact has been reiterated in the
affidavit evidence of Shri Sribatsa Kumar Mohapatra,
without admitting that he had worked under the 1st Party-
Management since 5.2.1985. In any case these issues
become insignificant or immaterial as the 2nd Party-
workman has stated to have retired from service and in
that case he is not entitled to the protection of the
provisions of Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act,
1947. These issues are decided accordingly against the
2nd Party-workman.
ISSUE NO. 4
10. In view of the findings recorded above under
Issues Nos. 1 to 3 the 2nd Party-workman is not entitled
to any relief and his claim is liable to be dismissed.
11. The reference is answered accordingly.
J. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 2 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1545-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ
vks,uthlh fyfeVsM] f'kolkxj] vle ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa
vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa
dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] xksgkVh ds
iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 3@2008) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh;
ljdkj dks 2&7&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹iQk- la- ,y&30015@8@2007&vkbZ vkj (,e)º
tksgu rksiuks] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 2nd July, 2013
S.O. 1545.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the common Award (Ref.
No. 3/2008) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal/Labour Court, Guwahati now as shown in the
Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers
in relation to the management of ONGC Ltd., Sibsagar,
Assam, and their workman, which was received by the
Central Government on 2-7-2013.
[ F. No.-L30015/8/2007-IR (M)]
JOHAN TOPNO, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR
COURT, GUWAHATI, ASSAM
Present :
SHRI L. C. DEY. MA., LL.B.,
Presiding Officer,
C.G..I.T.-Cum-Labour Court, Guwahati
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4093
In the matter of an Industrial Dispute between :
The Management of O.N.G.C., Sibsagar, Assam.
Vrs.
Their Workmen represented by the Secretary,
ONGC Field Party Contingent Workers’
Association, Jorhat, Assam
Ref. Case No. 03 of 2008.
APPEARANCES
For the Management :
Mr. P. K. Roy, Advocate.
Mr. S. K. Chakrabarty, Advocate.
Mrs. A. Chakrabarty, Advocate.
For the Union :
Mr. A. Dasgupta, Advocate.
Mr. S. Das, Advocate,
Miss M. Das, Advocate.
Date of Award : 31-5-2013
AWARD
1.
This Reference Case is initiated upon raising an
Industrial Dispute between the ONGC Field Party Workers’
Association, Jorhat and the management of ONGC Ltd.,
Sibsagar, which was referred by the Ministry of Labour &
Employment, Government of India, vide their Order No.
L-30015/8/2007-IR(M); Dated: 03-03-2008 u/s 10(1)(d)
of the I.D. Act, 1947. The Schedule of the Reference is
as under:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the demands of ONGC Field Party
Contingent Workers Association, namely, (i) for
restraining the management of ONGC from
introducing contract labour for contingent work and
to allow contingent work to be performed by the
members of their Union (ii) Quashing the tender
notice No. ER/MM/GSD/39/97-98 issued by the
Dy. GM (MM), Exploration Business Group,
ONGC, Sibsagar, Assam and (iii) to enforce the
certified Standing Orders relating to regularization
of 223 contingent workers, are just and legal? If so,
what directions need to be issued and to what relief
the 223 workmen are entitled to?”
2.
After registration of this Reference case, the
notices were served and both the parties namely, ONGC
Field Party Contingent Workers Association (hereinafter
called Workers’ Associations) and the Management of
ONGC Ltd., Sibsagar, Assam appeared and contested the
proceeding by filing Claim Statement/Written Statement.
The Workers Association raised a dispute before the
Regional Labour Commissioner (C) in the year 1996 claiming
regularization of a little more than about 100 workers
who completed the requisite period of service for
regularization. While the ONGC Ltd. (hereinafter called
the Management) resisted the claim of the workers before
the Assistant Labour Commissioner (C), Dibrugarh and on
failure to settle the dispute in the conciliation FOC report
was submitted by the Conciliation Officer to the
Government of India on 27-10-97. During the pendency
of the conciliation proceeding the management issued
formal Advertisement on 11.11.97 regarding engagement
of contract labourer through some individual contractors
in place of existing contingent workers. While the workers
association filed a Writ Petition being Civil Rule No.
5744/97 in the Gauhati High Court on 11-12-97 with
prayer for restraining the management from introducing
contract labourer in place of the contingent workers by
abolishing existing system, and the contingent works
performed by the members of the workers Association
shall be allowed to be continued as before and to quash
the tender notice issued by the management on 11-11-97;
and also for regularization of the members of the workers
Association under Standing Order of the ONGC.
Accordingly the Hon’ble Single Judge of the Gauhati High
Court disposed of the Civil Rule No.5744/97 on 15-9-98
directing that the Secretary to the Government of India,
Ministry of Labour and Employment, New Delhi or the
competent authority of the Central Government will pass
order under sub- section (5) of Section 12 of the Industrial
Dispute Act,1947 on the FOC Report dated 27-10-97.
In the mean time on 28-10-98 the Central Government
passed an order u/s 12(5) of the I.D. Act,1947 with their
views that there was no reason for referring a case to the
Industrial Tribunal for adjudication due to the reason as
under :
“The concerned workers are contingent/casual
workers, hence, their claim to regularize their service
is not valid.”
Subsequently the workers Association preferred
Writ Appeal being No. 352/98 which was dismissed with
observation that since an order has now been passed declining
the Reference, the only course open to the Applicant is to
approach this Court in Writ Proceeding, and allowed the
interim direction issued by the learned Single Judge at the
time of disposal of the Writ Petition to continue to operate
for a period of another 2 week from the date of passing of
the order. Thereafter, the workers Association preferred
another Writ Petition being No. Civil Rule No. 6771/98
before the Hon’ble Gauhati High Court & the Hon’ble High
Court disposed of the said Writ Petition with direction to
the Central Government to refer the claim of the members
of the petitioners/Association to regularize/ conversion of
their status as regular employees of the ONGC in accordance
with the Standing Order in force.
On being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the order
passed by the Hon’ble High Court in Civil Rule No. 6771/
98 the management of ONGC preferred an Appeal before
the Division Bench of the Hon’ble Gauhati High Court
vide Writ Appeal No.371/2005 against the judgment passed
4094
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
by the learned Single Judge which was also disposed of
holding that there was no infirmity in the order passed by
the learned Single Judge. Thereafter, the Management of
ONGC preferred a Special Leave Petition before the Hon’ble
Supreme Court against the judgment passed by the Gauhati
High Court in Writ Appeal No. 371/05 and the Hon’ble
Supreme Court while issuing the SLP was pleased to stay
operation of the impugned judgment and order dated 14-
11-06. In the mean time the Central Government in terms of
the judgment and order dated 15-9-98 passed in Civil Rule
No. 5744/97 made an order of this Reference vide order
dated 3-3-2008. Thereafter the management of ONGC filed
petition before the Apex Court stating that since the order
so passed by the Government was an attempt to over reach
jurisdiction of the Hon’ble Apex Court and in particular,
the interim order dated 2-3-2007 passed by the Hon’ble
Apex Court, prayed for staying operation of the order dated
14-11-06 passed by Hon’ble Gauhati High Court. The
Hon’ble Supreme Court passed an order of the stay of the
proceeding pending before this Tribunal and ultimately
the SLP (Civil) No. 3278/07 was disposed of on 10-11-08
modifying and restricting the terms of Reference and
directing this Tribunal to consider the cases of the workers
who claimed to have completed 240 days of work within a
period of 12 consecutive months in a year and also fulfilled
the conditions of regularization.
The case of the workers Association, inter-alia is
that the ONGC explore Oil and different kinds of Natural
Gases from different parts of the Country, and for that
purpose they collect some data called as seismic data under
the surface of the earth in order to assess the quantity of
natural gas and oil where available. This job is being
performed by the employees called Geo-Physical Field
Party. The members of the present workers Association are
called as Contingent Workers who require to assist the
Field Party in exploration of their mobile exploration work
which include laying of cables, Geo-phones and shot firing
for exploration in order to collect seismic data. Some of
them are engaged as Drivers, Clerks, General Store Keeper,
Peon etc. This operation of collection of seismic data, is
being carried throughout the year except rainy days and
during the rainy days, the contingent workers are engaged
in repairing and other relevant works including clerical and
other allied works. It is mentioned that there are about 223
(mentioned in Annexure-B of the claim statement) contingent
workers who are members of the present Association have
been working continuously since 1994 under the Deputy
General Manager (MM), ONGC, without any break till 1997.
The Association further stated that the ONGC have a
separate Standing Order to regulate the job of the
contingent workers and casual workers which is called the
Certified Standing Order for contingent employees of the
ONGC. The Clause 2(1) of the Standing Order stipulates
that the contingent workers are of two categories, namely
(a) Temporary (b) Casual. Clause-2(ii) contemplates that a
worker who has been on the roll of the Corporation and
has not less than 180 days of attendance in any period of
12 consecutive months shall be temporary workman, and
the workman who has put in not less than 240 days in any
period of 12 consecutive month and have possessed
minimum qualification prescribed by the Corporation may
be considered for conversion as regular employee while
Clause-2(iii) of the said Standing Order provides that the
workman who is neither temporary nor regular shall be
considered as casual workman; and that the member of the
present workers Association working under the Corporation
for a long spell of time have fulfilled the criteria laid down
in the Standing Order for their regularization. The eligible
workers have also approached the authority concerned for
their regularization but their grievances remained
unredressed. Despite having large number of vacant posts
which are being filled up from the open market the
contingent workers have not been regularized. Thereafter
the workers Association preferred intervention of the
Regional Labour Commissioner raising Industrial Dispute
for regularization of the members of the Association. While
the R.L.C(C) entrusted the Assistant Labour Commissioner
(C), who initiated the conciliation proceeding but it failed
and ultimately FOC was submitted.
The workers Association also alleged that during
the pendency of the process of regularization of contingent
workers the ONGC resorted to an unfair labour practice by
abolishing the contingent jobs performed through their
existing employees and proposed to get it done through a
Contractor. Such an act of the ONGC introducing contract
labour system is noting but to deprive the contingent
workers from their legitimate claim of regularization.
Subsequently, the ONGC in order to abolish contingent
system of employment informed the workmen not to attend
their duties from the month of July,1997 onwards. Upon
which the workers of the Association resorted to protest,
strike and representation before different authorities but
their dispute remain unsettled. In the mean time the Dy.
General Manager (MM), ONGC published an advertisement
in the Local English Daily namely, Eastern Clarion on 11-
11-97 calling for bid from the intending bidders to supply
contract labourer to do the job performed by the members
of the petitioner/Association and thereby the management
of ONGC was found determine to abolish the system of
contingent workers. The workers Association further
submitted that they had accepted the temporary job with
expectation to be regularized in terms of the Standing Order
and the deviation from the provision of the said Standing
Order by the ONGC Ltd. is violative of the Principle laid
down in Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and
it is against the public policy.
The workers Association further stated that the job
performed by the contingent workers were perennial in
nature and they used to work continuously throughout
the year while the management made some artificial break
with a view to deprive the workers from regularisition of
their services in terms of Standing Order; and in spite of
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4095
artificial break a large number of them have completed 240
days of continuous work within 12 consecutive month and
they are eligible to be regularized. It is contended by the
Association that the engagement of contract labourers
against such perennial jobs removing the existing workers
against the principle laid down in the Contract Labour
( Regulation and Abolition) Act,1970 and such illegal Act
of the management to engage contract labour is liable to
be rejected and the tender notice issued by the ONGC for
engagement of contract labour is also liable to be quashed;
and as the workers listed in Annexure-A after fulfilling the
conditions of Certified Standing Order they are entitled to
regularistation of their services. Hence, the workers
Association prayed for quashing the introduction of
Contract Labour system in place of contingent workers
and to direct the management for regularisation the service
of 223 number of contingent workers as mentioned in the
Annexure-A with effect from July,1997 with all consequential
benefit till the date of their resumption on duty.
3.
The Management of Oil and Natural Gas
Corporation Ltd. submitted their written Statement stating
inter-alia that the ONGC is a government owned Company
engaged in the business of exploration of Crude Oil and
Natural Gas in various parts of the Country and the ONGC
is duty bound to comply with the Constitutional
requirement under Article 16 of the Constitution of India
before offering job/service to any person and disengage
persons through contractors for performance of unskilled
nature of jobs like carrying and laying of cables and other
materials. With the liberalization and globalization of
economy, there is shift in Government Policies in respect
of exploration and production of oil and natural gas in
India and after announcement of New Exploration License
Policy by the Government of India. The ONGC along with
other Private Companies Indian and Foreign are
participating in Auction which is an open bidding process.
Thus the ONGC have to compete in the open market with
private and/or multinational companies to bid and win
petroleum exploration license like any other bidder. Under
the above circumstances the ONGC management can not
make any recruitment and/or regularization in anticipation
of success in any such future bidding process. After raising
of the dispute by the Workers Association, due to
development took place in the field of business of the
ONGC, which is directly bearing in the development claimed
by the Associations, management is not in a position to
deploy the members of the workers Association as claimed
by them, nor it has any sanctioned regular vacancies after
1999.
The management denied that all the workers given
in list in Annexure-A are the members of the Associations
and that all its members are contingent workers employed
by the ONGC as alleged. It is also denied by the
management that during off season, rainy days the
contingent workers are engaged for repairing and other
allied works including clerical and other works as alleged.
It is stated by the ONGC that the seismic survey is
conducted in selected fields which normally starts towards
the end of November and ends before the end of May next
year as the rain is the hindrance for seismic survey. It is
also added that the contingent workers are engaged
generally for laying cable, geophones and shifting materials
from one place to another but denied that such contingent
workers are engaged as Clerks, General Store Keeper or
Peon or clerical or any other allied jobs and there services
have never been required by the ONGC at any period
beyond the field season. As such, none of the said
contingent workers has ever completed 240 days in a year
and the contingent workers can never be engaged
permanently and or on regular basis because in the very
next field season seismic survey may be conducted in some
other fields and it may not be in the same locality, even may
be in different State or far away from the field where such
survey was undertaken last. It is also not possible for the
ONGC to carry these contingent labourers from one State/
place to another. It is further averred that while engaging
the contingent labourer their educational qualification or
other eligibility is required for making any recruitment in
the ONGC under their Recruitment Rule, has never been
considered and the seismic survey is being conducted in
primitive manner.
The ONGC mentioned that the workers Association
had challenged the process of engaging Contractors by
floating tender by filing Writ Petition in C.R. No. 5744
of 1997 but was unable to get any relief from the Hon’ble
High Court. It is also denied that these workers have been
working in the aforesaid job without any break till 1997 and
that the attendance register for that behalf were maintained
by the Party Chief in respect of Geophysical party. The
ONGC again stated that the Certified Standing Order for
contingent workers of the ONGC is always read with other
relevant guideline and subject to the constitutional
limitations and the Constitution being the Suprema Lex,
shall prevail over all other statutes.
The management again pleaded that they had a policy
of regularization during 1967 onwards when a guideline
was given to consider cases of absorption of contingent
workers where such are considered for engagement against
regular posts, if available, and no extra post was created
for their absorption; and that mere completing 240 days in
12 consecutive months was only one of the criteria, under
the guidelines issued vide Circular No. 27(70)/87-IR dated
16.07.1991. Other criteria required to fulfill for regularization
are laid down under Clause 4.2 of the above mentioned
executive instruction of ONGC in this regard are:
(i) They have completed 240 working days service in the
commission (now Corporation) in the 12 consecutive
months;
4096
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(ii) They are registered with the employment exchange;
(iii) They are held against regular post;
(iv) They posses the requisite qualification and experience
etc. laid down in the ONGC (R & P) regulation;
(v) No extra post will be created for absorption of
contingent workers and no relaxation in the
qualification will be accorded;
(vi) Relaxation in age-limit upto 35 years for technical cadres
and 30 years for non-technical cadres may be
accorded.
The management again denied the allegation that
they are indulging in unfair labour practice abolishing the
contingent jobs performed through the existing employees
and proposed to get it done through a contractor resulting
in deprivation of large number of contingent workers from
their claim of regularization. The management further denied
the averments made in paras-ll, 12,13,14,16,17,18 and 19 of
the claim statement filed by the Association. It is added by
the management that the Hon’ble Guwahati High Court
vide their judgment and order dated 12.3.98 in W.A.
No.352 of 1998 dismissed the Appeal filed by the workers
Association up-holding the Guwahati High Court’s order
passed in Civil Rule No.5744 of 1997, refusing to grant
the interim relief sought for by the workers Association.
It is further denied by the management that the Hon’ble
High Court did not issue any specific direction for
engagement of the contingent workers as alleged. Even
otherwise, none of them can be regularized in view of the
law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Secretary,
State of Karnataka-vs-Uma Devi and Ors. Reported in
(2006) 4 SCC 1. The management also said that the
members of the workers Association who raised the
dispute has no nexus and/or relationship even remotely,
with the floating of the tenders.
The management denying the statements made in
the Para-26 of the claim statements, stated that the workers
Association while raising the dispute vide their letter dated
21.6.96 had claimed that there were little more than 100
workers who have completed requisite period of service,
required for their regularization, but now the Association
has annexed a list of 223 persons claiming their
regularization and hence, the claim of the Association is
un-genuine apart from being legal and not maintainable in
law. The management of ONGC categorically denied that
the concerned documents in connection with the service
of the workers concerned, as alleged, are laying with the
custody of the management and as such, the claim for
calling the attendance register and the wage register for
security and verification of the claim of the Association is
wholly uncalled for, and it is the burden of the workers
Association to prove their own case and they can not shift
the burden in this manner. However, the plea of the workmen
that the documents like Identity Card, Certificate issued by
the Party Chief, etc. were lost by them is an attempt to make
out the case in favour of the Association. Further the
documents annexed by the Workers Association are
marked as Annexure-N (Exhibit-N) does not show in any
manner that any of the person named therein has
completed 240 days of work within a period of 12
consecutive months in a year, and the gate passes always
have a special validity dates and are issued for a different
purpose such as collection of arrears, bonus etc. and the
said documents can not form the basis of the claim for
regularization of service. It is also mentioned that the said
documents has annexed ( Exhibit-N) are on the face of it,
tempered with, overwritten and as such, fabricated.
The management also denied the averment made in
paragraphs-30,31 and 32. It is contended by the
management that the claim of the person beyond the
Annexure-N are only speculative and no legs to stand as
the person named in Annexure-N did not ever work as
contingent workers in the ONGC, their names have now
been added to make a false claim for regularization. Under
the above circumstances the management prayed for
answering the order of Reference as modified by the
Hon’ble Supreme Court in negative against the workers
Association.
4.
In order to assail the plea of the management
made in the written statement the Association submitted
Additional written statement and mentioned that the
statements made in the written statement by the
management are not supported by the materials on record.
In the written statement the Association beside the list of
the members of the Union, another list of workers/members
of the Union enclosed as Annexure-M who have sufficient
documents to prove that they have completed more than
240 days of work in a particular year such as, Sri Pinku
Dutta, Pabitra Das and Rajani Gogoi who have completed
240 days but their names were not appeared in Annexure-
M and although the workers were engaged as contingent
workers but most of them have completed 240 days service
in a particular year. The management, despite specific order
passed by the Hon’ble High Court in Civil Rule No.5744/
1997 deliberately engaged contract labour in place of
contingent workers with a view to deprive the members of
the Association. It is averred that the statement made in
paragraphs-16 & 17 of the W.S. filed by the management
are misleading, baseless and concocted as the workers
mentioned in Annexure- A are contingent workers directly
employed by the ONGC and the members of the workers
Association and most of the workers were recruited
through local employment exchange or through interview
of the Head Office considering their qualification and
experience. The Association pleaded that Pay register will
prove the facts regarding continuous engagement of the
concerned workers and the management also paid bonus
to almost all the workers besides other facilities including
medical facilities; and the workers have been working
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4097
continuously for a long period as such, it become essential
to introduce the Certified Standing Order to regularize
the service of the workers. It is added that the jobs
performed by the contingent workers are not unskilled in
nature rather most of the jobs are skilled jobs for which
license is required to be obtained from the appropriate
authority and they have to perform some works under the
roof during rainy season. The Association denied the
contents of paragraphs-22,23,24,27,29,30,31,32,33 to 35
of the Written Statement of the management and
mentioned that the management has been violating the
provision of the Certified Standing Order in all respect in
order to deprive the workers from their legitimate right/
benefit since the workers were working? against vacant
post of contingent workers.
5.
The Workers Association examined one witness
while the management examined two witnesses. Both the
parties have proved some documents in support of their
testimony. I have heard argument from both the sides at
length. Let me discuss the evidence adduced by both the
sides.
Workmen witness No.1, Sri Jitumoni Borah, The
Secretary, ONGC Field Party Contingent Workers
Association, Jorhat stated that the workers listed in
Annexure-A were engaged regularly for a long period
continuously and they were termed as Contingent workers
whose Attendance Registers were maintained by the party
Chief of the respective Geophysical parties. The ONGC
has a separate Standing Order to regulate the jobs of
contingent workers and casual workers, which was framed
under the provisions of Industrial Employment (Standing
Orders) Act,1946, called as “Certified Standing Orders
for contingent Employees of ONGC” (marked as Exhibit-
B). The Clause-2(i) of the Standing Order stipulates that
the contingent employees are of two categories, namely,
Temporary & Casual. Clause-2(ii) contemplates that a
workman who has been on the roll of the Corporation and
has not less than 180 days of attendance in any period of
12 consecutive month shall be temporary workman, and
240 days in any period of 12 consecutive months and who
possess the minimum qualification prescribed by the
Corporation may be considered as regular employee.
Clause-3(iii) of the said Standing Order provided that the
workman who is neither temporary nor regular, shall be
considered as casual workman. He mentioned that almost
all the workers indicated in Annexure-A (Exhibit-N) have
fulfilled the criteria laid down in the Standing Order for
regularization and they have approached the concerned
authority for regularization of the service of the concerned
eligible workers but the management did not take any
initiative towards any regularization, while the Association
adopted some agitational programmers to impress upon
the management to make an amicable settlement but the
management instead of regularizing the services of
contingent workers recruited some new persons from the
open market while the Association raised Industrial Dispute
before the Regional Labour Commissioner (C) and the
Assistant Labour Commissioner (C), Dibrugarh initiated
conciliation for settlement of the issue but it failed and this
Reference was initiated. W.W.1 mentioned that during the
course of conciliation the management adopted some unfair
labour practices with a view to abolish contingent system
of employments and to introduce contract labour system
issued formal advertisement on 11.11.97 regarding
engagement of contract labour through some contractors
vide Exhibit-E. Such a practice of engagement of contract
labourer by abolishing direct system of employment is
against the public policy as the members of the workers
Association accepted the temporary job with an expectation
that their services would be regularized in terms of the
Standing Order. Then the Association preferred a Writ
Application of Civil Rule No.5744/97 before the Hon’ble
High Court with prayer for restraining the management
from introducing contract labour for the contingent works
abolishing the existing system declaring the tender notice
issued by the management as illegal and liable to be
quashed and the members of the Association shall be
allowed to continue as before. An interim order in this regard
was also prayed for to the effect that further proceeding of
the operation of the said tender notice may be stayed but
the Hon’ble Single Judge admitted the petition declining
to pass any interim stay order. Subsequently on 23.12.97
the management issued a corrigendum to the earlier tender
notice published in Asian Age on 23.12.97 revising the
date of submission of tender to 16.12.97 and opening the
date of tender to 29.12.97 vide Exhibit-G. The aforesaid Civil
Rule No. 5744/97 was disposed of on 15.9.98 by the Hon’ble
High Court directing the Secretary to the Government of
India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi or the competent
authority of the Central Government to pass an order u/s 5
of Section 12 of Industrial Dispute Act on F.O.C. report
submitted by the Assistant Labour Commissioner (C),
Dibrugarh within a period of 2 months from the date of
receipt of the certified copy of judgment along with copy
of the Writ Petition from the workman Association; and
also with direction that until further orders passed by the
Central Government and until the dispute if referred is
adjudicated under the Industrial Dispute Act,1947 the
ONGC will as and when required and as far as practicable,
employ the said workmen named in Annexure-A to the Writ
Petition directly in accordance with the Rules and the law
which are applicable vide Exhibit-H. But the management
did not engage the said contingent workers and continued
the engagement of contract labour in place of contingent
workers. In the mean time the Central Government passed
an order u/s 12(c) of Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 opining
as :
“The concerned workers are contingent/casual
workers, hence their claim to regularize their service is not
valid”, vide Exhibit-I. While the Association preferred a
Writ Appeal No. 352/98 before the Division Bench before
the Hon’ble Guwahati High Court against the judgment of
Single Judge and the Division Bench disposed of the said
W.A. vide judgment (marked as Exhibit-K) holding that if
4098
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
the appellants were aggrieved by the order of Govt. of
India, Ministry of Labour, declining to refer the dispute for
regularization the only course open to the applicants to
approach the Court by Writ Proceeding vide Exhibit-J. Upon
this findings of the Hon’ble High Court the Association
filed a Writ petition No. Civil Rule 6771/98 (Exhibit-K) and
the Hon’ble High Court passed an order directing the Central
Government to refer the claims of the Association for
regularization/conversion of their status as regular employee
of the ONGC in accordance with the Standing Order in force.
Then the management preferred Writ Appeal against the
judgment of the learned Single Judge passed in Civil Rule
No.6771/98 and the said Writ Appeal being No.371/05
(Exhibit-L) was disposed of affirming the judgment of the
Single Judge. Thereafter, the management preferred SLP
(Exhibit-M) before the Hon’ble Supreme Court against the
Writ Appeal No.371/05. The Hon’ble Supreme Court disposed
of the said SLP vide order dated 10.11.08 (marked as Exhibit-
M).
The workman witness No.1 further stated that the
contingent workers were doing the works of perennial in
nature and they used to work continuously throughout
the year while the management in order to deprive the
workers from regularistion made some artificial break but a
large number of workers who have completed 240 days of
continuous work within a period of 12 consecutive months
to become eligible for regularization. When the contingent
workers raised demand for regularistion of their service in
terms of the Certified Standing Order through their Union,
the management adopted the policy of engagement of
contract labourer against the said contingent workers with
a view to frustrate the genuine demand of the workers
which is against the principle laid down in Contract Labour
(Regulation & Abolition) Act,1970 and hence the tender
notice issued by the management in this connection is
liable to be quashed. Further contention of the workman
witness No.1 is that the management and the workers are
bound to abide by the Provision of Certified Standing Order
and as the workers concerned listed in Annexure-A (Exhibit-
N) have fulfilled the conditions of Certified Standing Order
they are entitled to be regularized. It is pointed out that a
section of workers have lost their documents like Identity
Card, certificate issued by the management and some of
the workers have documents to show that they have
completed more than 240 days of work in a relevant year.
The W.W.l has produced the list of 87 numbers of workers
Vide Exhibit’ A’ who completed 240 days of work within
the relevant period of 12 consecutive months as shown in
Exhibits-N(1) to Exhibit-N(109).
The workmen witness No.1 further stated that the
job relating to seismic survey and other connected job in
which the contingent workers have been employed is part
and parcel of day to day activity of ONGC which issued
various Circulars and Directives in connection with the
engagement, regularization and termination of contingent
workers besides Certified Standing Order. The W.W.1
mentioned that the workers as listed in Annexure-A have
fulfilled the conditions for regularization. The documents
Exhibit-N series [ Exhibits-N(1) to N(109)] clearly proved
that the workers have completed 240 days of work within a
period of 12 consecutive months in a year and they were
recruited through local employment exchange and as such,
the workers involved in this case deserve regularization.
During his cross-examination the workmen witness
No.1 stated that neither he produced any document to
show that other members of the Association entrusted him
to conduct the case nor did he submit any document to
show that he was Secretary of the Field Party Contingent
Workers Association. He said that in Exhibit-A he had
mentioned the names of the contingent workers who are
the members of the Association but he has not submitted
any paper to show that in fact they are the members of the
Association. He admitted the fact that the Exhibit-N (17)
the Certificate shows that the period of service rendered
by Sri Pradip Borah w.e.f 1.11.95 to 30.6.96 whereas the
same document annexed in Writ Petition being Civil Rule
No.5744/97 (Exhibit-1) at page 35 shows the period of service
rendered by Pradip Borah is 1.12.95 to 30.6.96 but he does
not know who had done manipulation (Exhibit-N-17) just
to show the working days as 240 days; Exhibit-N(1) (Proved
in original) is his (WW.1) own certificate issued by the
Party Chief of G.P.32, ONGC which shows that the period of
service rendered by him w.ef. 8.11.94 to 6.7.95 but in the
page 44 in Civil Rule No.5744/97 (Exhibit-1) his certificate
shows the period from 20.12.93 to 5.5.94. However, he denied
the suggestion tendered by the management that in the
Exhibit-N-1 he had manipulated the dates as 8.11.94 to 6.7.95
instead of 22.11.93 to 16.5.94. The W.W.1 also mentioned
that Exhibit-N(36) ( Proved in original) the letter shows that
the Memo No.JRT/EBG/GP-32/C/Workers/93-94 dated
30.6.92 and the said certificate issued to Prafulla Saikia
covers the period of his engagement as 2.11.91 to 30.6.92;
at page No.27 in Civil Rule No.5744/97 (Exhibit-1) the
certificate No. JRT/EBG/GP-32/C/Workers/93-94 dated
30.6.92 shows that Prafulla Saikia has worked from
22.11.93 to 16.5.94; Exhibit-N(36). But he denied that
the Exhibit-N(36) was not submitted before the Hon’ble
High Court and that in Exhibit-N(36) he had manipulated
the date with effect from 2.11.91 to 30.6.92 instead of
22.11.93 to 16.5.94 and also the date 30.6.92 given by
the party Chief in place of the date 16.5.94. He
categorically denied that they have fabricated/tempered
the dates mentioned in Exhibit-N(1) to Exhibits-N(109);
and that all the workmen have completed 240 days. He
further denied that they have produced all the documents
containing Exhibit-N(l) to Exhibit-N(109) just to show
that they had worked 240 days in a year. He again
mentioned that he has not submitted any document to
show that there are vacant post in ONGC, nor any document
to show that his name was forwarded by the local
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4099
employment exchange, nor any document showing
educational qualification of the workers. He again denied
the suggestion tendered by the management that some of
the persons named in Exhibit-A as mentioned in his evidence
on-Affidavit do not possess any working certificate and
that the Party Chief had no authority to issue experience
certificate as indicated in some of the documents marked
as Exhibits- N(l) to N(109). He also denied that the
temporary Identity Cards issued to the workers do not show
the engagement in ONGC as contingent workers and that
the statements made in para-25 and 26 in his evidence on
Affidavit are false and also the documents submitted by
him in this case are false just to show their entitlement of
working of 240 days in ONGC.
6.
Management Witness No.1, Sri Amit Kumar
Khulbe, Chief Geophycist, Geophysical Service, ONGC
Ltd. who was duly authorized by the management of ONGC
to depose in this Reference Case, stated that originally a
dispute was raised by the ONGC Filed Party Contingent
Workers Association on 21.6.96 before the Regional
Labour Commissioner (C), Guwahati claiming that there
was little more than 100 workers who have completed
requisite period of service vide Exhibit-2 while the
ONGC management resisted the allegations on the ground,
inter-alia, that the workers at the relevant time were
engaged on contingent basis, for works related to seismic
survey, only during the field season, and that none of the
contingent workers has ever worked for continuous 240
days in 12 consecutive month in a year. Subsequently FOC
report was submitted by the Assistant Labour
Commissioner, Dibrugarh to the Government of India,
Ministry of Labour and Employment. In the mean time
the workers Association filed Writ Petition in Civil Rule
No.5744/97 before the Hon’ble High Court claiming their
regularistion as per provision of Certified Standing Order
of the ONGC but the documents annexed in the said Writ
Petition does not show that any of the member of the
workers Association have ever completed 240 days work
in a year, while the workers Association has now annexed
the same set of documents in the instant case changing/
altering the period of service rendered by them in the said
documents and the certified copy of the said Writ Petition
in Civil Rule No.5744/97 has already been proved as
Exhibit-l. According to the MW No.1, upon rejection of
the Writ Petition by the Hon’ble High Court vide order
dated 11.12.97 the workers Association preferred Writ
Appeal being Writ Appeal No.16/97 and in the said Writ
Appeal the workers Association has produced some
documents but none of those documents shows that any
of the member of the workers Association has completed
240 day in a year. He has produced the certified copy of
Writ Appeal of 16 of 1997 as Exhibit-4. But the W.P. No.
5744 was disposed of by the Hon’ble High Court without
granting any relief with direction to the Government,
Ministry of Labour, to pass order u/s 12(5) of Industrial
Dispute Act, 1947 upon the FOC report dated 27.10.97
submitted by the ALC (C). Again the Workers Association
on being dissatisfied preferred Writ Appeal being No. 352/
98 before the Division Bench of the Hon’ble High Court. In
the mean time the Central Government passed an order dt.
28.10.98 u/s 12(5) of the Industrial Dispute Act,1947 opining
that there was no reason for referring the case to the
Industrial Tribunal for adjudication due to the reason:-
“The concerned workers are contingent casual
workers, hence their claim to regularize their service is not
valid” .
The Division Bench of the Hon’ble High Court, on
the other hand, dismissed the Writ Appeal No. 352/98
holding that if the Appellant was aggrieved by the order of
the Government of India, declining to refer the dispute as
aforesaid the only course open to them was to approach
the Court in a Writ Proceeding. Then the workers
Association filed Writ Petition being Civil Rule No.6771/98
before the Hon’ble Guwahati High Court seeking quashing
of the order dated 28.10.98 of the Central Government and
for direction to the Government of India to make Reference
u/s 10 of the I.D. Act and also to direct the ONGC not to
engage contractors to perform the work by the contingent
work. On 30.3.05 the learned Single Judge allowed the Writ
Petition being Civil Rule No.6771/98 with direction to the
Government of India to refer the claim of the workers
Association for regularization. While the ONGC filed a Writ
Appeal being Writ Appeal No.371/05 against the judgment
and order passed by the learned Single Judge on 30.3.05
but the said Writ Appeal was dismissed. Then the
management preferred a Special Leave Petition before the
Hon’ble Apex Court which was admitted staying the
operation of the impugned judgment and order dated
14.11.06 passed by the Hon’ble High Court. In the mean
time the Ministry of Labour and Employment, Government
of India passed an order of Reference dated 15.9.98 and
referred the dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal. On
being approached by the Management the Hon’ble
Supreme Court passed an order staying the operation of
the order dated 14-11-06 the Division Bench of the Gauhati
High Court. Ultimately the Hon’ble Supreme Court after
hearing the parties was pleased to pass an order on
10-11-08 modifying and restricting the terms of Reference;
-the case of those workers who claimed to have
completed 240 days of work within a period of 12
consecutive months in a year and also fulfill the conditions
for regularization their cases would be considered by Central
Government Industrial Disputes, Tribunal Guwahati.
M. W-1 further stated that the seismic survey is
conducted at different places from time to time, which starts
towards the beginning of November and ends before the
ends of June, next year which is called field season and
during rainy season the survey work can not be done and
the service of the workers have never been required by the
ONGC at any period before the field season. Hence, none
4100
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
of the contingent workers of the Association has ever
completed 240 days in a year and they were never engaged
permanently or on regular basis due to the uncertainty that
the seismic survey would be carried out and conducted in
the same field in the same locality and may be in different
field locality or may be in different State or far away from
the field where survey were undertaken last and it would
not have been possible for the Management to carry those
contingent labourers from one state or place to another. It
is also mentioned that while engaging the contingent
labourers of the workers Association their educational
qualification or other eligibility as required for making any
recruitment in the ONGC as per recruitment Rules has never
been considered, and as the mode of conducting seismic
survey was done almost in a primitive manner unlike to
that of Western Countries. Hence, the ONGC decided to
improve the standard of quality and production introducing
modern sophisticated machineries and improved mode of
conducting the survey. In order to minimize the expenditure
and to improve the quality of works the management floated
the tenders and got the job done by the contractors
resulting in increase in production along with quality and
reduction of expenditure to a great extent. It is also
contended by the management witness No.1 that the names
of the workers given in Annexure-A to their Written
Statement are not the members of the workers Association
and they had not been working as contingent workers
continuously since 1994 under the Dy. General Manager
(MM), ONGC. He also said that it is not true that the workers
had been working in the aforesaid job without any break
till 1997, since the engagement of contingent workers are
carried out by the field party for a particular field season
and for specific period and fresh engagement, on need
basis, is done for each field season. He further said that
depending upon the period each worker works for a field
season, workers are paid bonus against claim made by
them and the record of operational report and the record
pertaining to bonus paid to the concerned workers and it
would show that none of the worker has completed 240
days in any year. In this regard he proved the filed party
operational report submitted by the Party Chief,
Geophysical PartyNo.10, Vide Exhibit-5 and Exhibit-5 (1)
for the season1992-93 which shows that total number of
field days for the field season is 180 days. It is also mentioned
that the worker Gajan Hazarika named at Annexure-N(30)
worked in party No.10 for field season 1992-93 but he did
not work 240 days in a year. The management witness No.1
also added some reports of the field party operational report
submitted by the Party Chief marked as Exhibit-6/6(1),
Exhibit-7/7(1), Exhibit-8/8(1), Exhibit-9(1), Exhibit-10/10(1),
Exhibit-12/12(1).
The Management witness No.1 also proved the
Bonus register of the Geophysical party No.10, Camp
Kathigaon for the field season 1996-97 the Ex-gratia
payment contingent Bill marked as Exhibit-14, Exhibit-15.
The management witness No.1 also said that none of the
contingent workers has worked 240 days in a year and the
job performed by the said workers are unskilled job as
well as the said workers were not engaged against any
particular post or vacancy nor the contingent workers ever
held any particular post and hence, the question of their
regularistion does not arise since they were engaged in
field season only and their service automatically ended
during the field season. He also stated that the gate passes
annexed by the workers Association are over written/
tempered with and as such fabricated.
Further contention of the management witness is
that as per the guidelines issued by the Corporate HQRS
dated 5-1-1987 and 3-9-1990 only General Manager or an
Officer of Higher Rank authorized by the General Manager
can issue service certificate while the party Chief is not an
officer of higher rank and as such, he can not issue service
certificate. In this regard he has proved the copy of Certified
Standing Order of ONGC and the orders issued by Corporate
HQRS dated 5-1-1987 and 3-9-1990 vide Exhibit-16, 16(1)
and 16(2) respectively. He also added the jobs performed
by the contingent workers are of non-perennial nature and
there is no notification issued by the appropriate
Government for abolition of contract labour in respect of
the job done in relation to seismic work during the field
season. He stated that the management, with a view to
survive in the changed scenario, after introduction of the
new Exploration Licensing Policy of the Government of
India, having lost its monopoly, had to cut its surplus
workforce by introducing Voluntary Retirement Scheme
since 1999 and hence, there is no question of creating any
post/vacancy for appointment/regularization of any of the
members of the workers Association. He has proved the
new Exploration Licensing Policy released by the
Government of India, Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas,
and the VRS vide Exhibit-17 and 18 respectively. Under the
above circumstances the management witness No.1
mentioned that the prayer of the worker Association made
in their claim statement are liable to be rejected; and the
Reference as modified by the Hon’ble Supreme Court is
liable to be answered in negative against the workers
Association.
During the cross-examination, management witness
no.1 stated that they used to engage contingent workers
while performing the Geophysical survey and there is no
time limit for exploration during the field season in the
Geophysical survey and the period of work depends upon
the volume of works. He also confirmed that Geophysical
survey is started preferably in the month of November,
during the dry period and it continues upto June
approximately. He further stated that before starting the
seismic survey they engage persons to perform preparatory
works which require 10 to 15 days approximately and after
completion of survey also it requires 10 to 15 days to wind
up the infrastructural materials and these jobs are done by
the contingent workers. He further said that the Identity
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4101
Cards are issued by them to the contingent workers for the
field season only. He categorically denied that the
contingent workers were engaged prior to 15 days to start
the job. He also said that Exhibit-l0 the operation report on
Geophysical Party No.88 for the field season 1994-95 was
submitted after completion of the work in the month of
November,1995. But he did not know whether the works of
G. P.88 was continued after 94-95 for another season 95-96.
He added that the former contingent workers sometimes
may be reengaged for another season on their approach
along with other new workers. The management witness
No.1 again mentioned that the party Chief is authorized to
issue memorandum and the Exhibit- N(l) and N(3); the
Identity Cards were issued by their Organistion and the
party Chief is the competent to issue the same. He also
said that some of the memorandums issued from their office
in prescribed format and signed by the party Chief who
was duly authorized. But the Exhibits-N(51), N(61), N(62),
N(73), N(105) and N(109), the Certificates though appears
to be issued by their Organistion but not in prescribed
format and he can not authenticated these Certificates. He
also denied the suggestion tendered by the Union that the
Exhibit-5 to Exhibit-12 were prepared by them for the sake
of this case; and that all the contingent workers completed
240 days in a year and as such, they are entitled to
regularization. He also denied the suggestion advanced
by the adverse party that the contingent workers were
terminated only to introduce contract labour in their places
and issuing tender notice Ext.ER/MM/GSD/39/97-98, and
that the contingent workers were terminated illegally i.e.
why they had invited the said tender.
7.
The Management witness No.2, Shri Ram
Chandra Mishra, the Chief Geo Physicist of ONGC, Boroda
who was the party Chief w.e.f. May,1993 to December,1994.
He categorically mentioned that the signature contained in
Exhibit- N(l) was put by him but all the dates are manipulated,
i.e. the date of issue of memorandum is shown as 6-7-95
whereas on 6-7-95 he was in Kolkata Office. He also stated
that the date inserted in page 44 of the memorandum in
Exhibit-1 is the correct date i.e. 5-5-1994, and the period of
service shown in Annexure-N(l) of Exhibit-A with effect
from 8-11-04 to 6-7-95 is manipulated, the correct period
would be 20-12-93 to 5-5-94 as mentioned at page 44 of
Exhibit-l ( Civil Rule No. 5744 of 1997). The period shown in
Exhibit-N(36) as 2-11-1991 to 30-6-1992 is not genuine and
manipulated though the signature contained in Exhibit-
N(36) appears to be his own but the date below his signature
in Exhibit-N(36) is manipulated, the correct period of
the memorandum should have been 22-11-93 to 16-5-94
as contained in the memorandum dated 16-5-94 (at page
27 of Exhibit-l). He also mentioned that the Annexure-B
of Exhibit-l is a genuine document but the memorandum
shown in the Exhibit- N(36) reflecting 93-94 but the period
of service has been manipulated as 2-11-91 to 30-6-92
because the documents printed for 93-94 the period of
service 91-92 cannot be given. He also added that since he
did not even joined in G.P.32 on 30-6-92 at Jorhat there is no
question of issue the Certificate on that day i.e. 30-6-92 by
him since he joined in G.P. No. 32 in November,1992. In his
cross-examination he said that the printed memorandums
are filled up by their Office Clerk and he signed the
memorandums after verification, and they used to maintain
Attendance Register for all the workers but he did not
submit the Attendance Register. He again stated that the
hand writing of the memorandum are not the hand writing
of office clerk and so far he knew no clerk has done these
manipulations. He also mentioned that as Party Chief he
used to issue temporary Identity Card to the workers to
facilitate to enter into the premises for duty. He denied the
suggestion tendered by the Association that they used to
engage contingent workers prior to one month of the
establishment of the camp in the base area and that after
completion of the works the contingent workers remained
there for 15/20 days to wind up the miscellaneous works.
He also categorically denied that the contingent workers
worked for 240 days in a field season within a period of 12
consecutive months and that the entry of their duties for
more than 240 days is reflected in Attendance Register
which was not produced before the Court.
8.
On careful scrutiny of the pleadings of both the
parties along with the evidence on record as discussed
above, it appears that initially the dispute was raised by
the workers Association regarding regularization of a little
more than 100 contingent workers and on failure of the
conciliation the Conciliation Officer submitted FOC report
and in the meantime the workers Association preferred Writ
Petition being No.Civil Rule No.5744/97 (Exhibit-1) before
the Hon’ble Gauhati High Court for regularization of the
services of the contingent workers and also for restraining
the Management from engaging the contract labour to
perform the job of the contingent workers but the Hon’ble
High Court passed an order directing the Government of
India to pass orders U/S 12(5) of I.D.Act, 1947 for granting
any relief as prayed for. On being dissatisfied the workers
Association preferred Writ Appeal in 352/98 which affirmed
the decision of the Hon’ble Single Bench of the Hon’ble
High Court passed in Civil Rule No. 5744/97. In the mean
time the Government of India passed an order u/s 12 (5) of
the I.D. Act,1947 opining as :
“the concerned workers are contingent/casual
workers, hence, their claim to regularize their service is not
valid”
Then the workers Association filed another Writ
Petition being Ne. 6771/98 before the Hon’ble Gauhati High
Court seeking quashing of the order dated 28-10-98 passed
by the Central Government and also for a direction to the
Government of India to make a reference u/s 10 of the
4102
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
I.D. Act. Accordingly the Hon’ble High Court allowed the
Writ Petition in Civil Rule No.6771/98 with direction to the
Government of India to refer the claim of the ONGC workers
Association for regularisaton etc. In the mean time the
Management of ONGC filed Writ Appeal No. 371/2005 against
the judgment and order passed in the Civil Rule No.6771/98,
but the said appeal was dismissed. While the Management
of ONGC filed Special Leave Petition being No.3278/07 before
the Hon’ble Supreme Court. Accordingly the Hon’ble
Supreme Court passed an order for issue of Notice staying
the operation of the impugned judgment and order of the
Division Bench of the Hon’ble High Court passed in Writ
Appeal No.371/05. Meanwhile, the Government of India,
Ministry of labour issued an order of reference in pursuance
of the order of the learned Single Judge, Gauhati High Court
passed in Civil Rule No.5744/97 and referred the dispute for
adjudication to this Tribunal (as per the Schedule mentioned
above) but the said Reference case was stayed in view of
the order dated 8-4-2008 passed by the Hon’ble Supreme
Court. Ultimately the Hon’ble Supreme Court after hearing
the parties was pleased to pass an order dated 10-11-08
modifying and restricting the terms of reference as under:
“We have heard learned counsel for the parties.
Learned counsel for the parties agreed that the cases
of those workers who claimed to have completed 240 days
of work within a period of 12 consecutive months in a year
and also fulfill the conditions for regularization their cases
would be considered by Central Government Industrial
Disputes, Tribunal Guwahati. The case of the petitioners
ONGC is that none of the workers have completed 240
days in a year. This dispute shall be adjudicated by the
Central Government, Industrial Tribunal, Guwahati. Since
the matter is pending for quite sometime, we request the
tribunal to decide the dispute between parties as
expeditiously as possible in any event within six months
from today. With these observations, the special leave
petition is disposed of” .
9.
Thus it is clear that the issue before this Tribunal
is to consider the case of those workers who have
completed 240 days of work within a period of 12
consecutive months in a year and also fulfilled the
conditions for regularization. To ascertain the period of
works done by the contingent workers, this Tribunal has
got no other alternative but to rely upon the documents
produced by the workmen vide Exhibit-N series (i.e. Exhibit-
N-l to Exhibits-N-109) and the documents relied upon by
the workers Association in the Civil Rule No. 5744/97
preferred by them before the Hon’ble High Court which
were submitted by the Management vide Exhibit-l series
(in 82 pages). Although, the workers Association in their
evidence mentioned that the Attendance Register of the
contingent workers were maintained by the Management
but the workers Association did not take any step for calling
for the Attendance Register nor any other document from
the custody of the Management in order to shift their
burden to establish their plea. It is found admitted that the
regularization of the workers is to be considered as per the
provisions of the Certified Standing Order and the relevant
Circulars/Orders issued by the ONGC Management from
time to time.
10. Let me examine the documents marked as
Exhibit-N series proved by the workers Association wherein
the particulars of 87 numbers of workers have been given.
The Exhibit-N(l) regarding engagement of workman
Jitumoni Bora (W.W.l) & Exhibit-N(2) the Identity Card
issued in the name of the workman, Jitumoni Bora, the
Secretary, ONGC Field Party Contingent Workers
Association, Jorhat, shows on the face of those documents
some over writing and mark of erasing on the date/period
of employment, the date of issue and the date of signature.
In Exhibit-N(l) the number of Memorandum i.e. JRT/EBG/
GP-32/C/Workers/94-95 dated 6.7.95 has been shown as
JRT/EBG/GP-32/C/Workers/93-94 Date 5.5.94 in the
documents at page 44 of Exhibit-l, submitted before the
Hon’ble High Court in Civil Rule No.5744/97( Exhibit-l) by
the Workers Association. In the said document the period
of engagement has been shown as 08.11.94 to 6.7.95 and
the date of issue of the Memorandum has been shown as
06.7.95 while in page 44 of the Exhibit-l the period of
engagement appears as 20.12.93 to 5.5.94 and the date of
issue of the Memorandum as 5.5.94. In Exhibit-N(2), the
validity period of issue of the temporary Identity Card has
been shown as 20.11.95 to 17.7.96 while in the similar
document at page-43 of Exhibit-l the period has been shown
as 23.01.95 to 17.04.95 and the Field season as 1994-95. In
Exhibit-N(2) the period 20.11.95 to 17.7.1996 appears to have
been typed out later on and the entries against the field
season 1994-95 has been disappeared. If we rely upon the
documents of page-44 and 43 in Exhibit-I, it is clear that the
concerned workman has not completed 240 days of work
during 1993-94 whereas the period of engagement from
8.11.94 to 6.7.95 as shown in Exhibit-N(1), the workman
appears to have completed 240 days but the said document
is found to be tempered/fabricate on the face of it. As such,
it cannot be admitted as it raised sufficient doubts in arriving
at the decision regarding the period of working days in
respect of the workman Sri Jitumoni Bora. Exhibit-N(3) &
N(4) appears to be Identity Card in respect of Amulya Saikia
issued by the Party Chief, GP-88 on 1.11.92 which was
valid upto June 1993 and the Exhibit-N(4) was issued without
giving any date for the field season 1994-95. In these
documents there is no specific period of working days. If
we accept the Exhibit-N(3) which was issued on 1.11.92
and the same was valid upto June,1993 the number of
working days appears less than 240 days. However, no
opinion can be formed on the Exhibit-N(4) as there is no
mention of period of engagement. In the Certificate marked
as Exhibit-N(5) regarding engagement of workman Nripen
Lohan, it appears that the said printed certificate has been
filled up in different hand writing with different ink and in
place of the total number of days both in figure and in word
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4103
there appears some manipulation and fabrication with
different hand writing as such, the said documents is liable
to rejected. The Identity Cards issued in the name of the
workmen Nripen Lahon marked as Exhibit-N(6), N(7), N(8)
do not reflect the period of engagement and hence, no
opinion can be drawn on these documents as to the period
of the works rendered by the workman Nripen Lohan. The
Exhibit-N(9), the Identity Card issued in the name of
workman Kula Dutta shows the field season 1995-96 and
nothing else, which was valid upto June 1996 and on the
basis of this Identity Card it can not be opined that the
workman has completed 240 days. Similarly in Exhibits-
N(10), N(11), & N(12) the Identity Card in respect of Jiban
Saikia and Promod Dutta there are the mention of season
1994-95, 1995-96 and valid upto June, 1992 respectively as
such, no inference can be drawn as to the working period
of the said workman.
Further in Exhibit-N(13), the certificate issued by the
Party Chief of G. P-23 in the name of the workman Nogen
Borah, it appears that there are some over writing/
manipulation in the date from 2.11.84 to 30.6.85 showing
240 days but this document can not be accepted due to
doubts as to its genuinity so the workman Nogen Borah is
not found to have established that he had completed 240
days of work. The Exhibit-N(14), the Identity Card issued
in the name of Ratul Dutta for the period valid upto
June,1996 and in the Exhibit-N(15), the Identity Card
issued against the said Ratul Dutta on 1.7.96 but both the
Identity Cards do not mention the period of employment.
The Identity Card marked as Exhibit-N(16) issued in the
name of Pradip Bora for the field season 1994-95 also
does not contain any date of engagement. In Exhibit-N(17),
the Memorandum issued in the name of workman Pradip
Bora shows the period of engagement with effect from
1.11.1995 to 30.6.1996 while in page 35 of Exhibit-1
the date of engagement has been shown with effect from
1.12.95 to 30.6.96 thus both the Exhibit-N(17) and page
35 of Exhibit-1 are found not the same in respect of the
date of engagement. Further in Exhibit-N(17) the date,
1.11.95 appears to have been fabricated/tempered as such,
the document marked as Exhibit- N(17) can not be
accepted. Exhibits-N(18), N(19) are the Identity Cards
in respect of the workman Amrit Kotoky and Torun Borah
but these cards do not show any specific period of work
moreover the dates of issue of these Identity Cards also
appears to have been over written. The Exhibit-N(20) to
Exhibit-N(22) are the Identity Cards in respect of the
workmen Gajen Hazarika issued on 2.11.93. These Cards
also do not reflect the period of work. Exhibit-N(23)
appears to be the Identity Card in respect of workman
Sushil Lahon but there is no mention of the period of
service. The Exhibits-N(24) & N(25) are the Identity
Cards in the name of workman Horeswar Boro but there
is no mention of the period of working days. Exhibits-
N(26) & N(27) are Identity Cards issued in favour of the
workman Profullo Bora issued on 1.11.95 and 11.11.96
respectively but there is nothing to show as to the working
period. Exhibit-N(28), N(29) are the Identity Cards in respect
of the workman Abony Gogoi and Robin Neog where there
is no mention of the working period. Exhibit-N(30) to Exhibit-
N(32) are the Identity Cards in respect of the workmen
Girin Baruah, Bidyut Baruah and Jayanta Kalita showing
the validity of the issue of the Identity Card for the period
03.11.95 to 30.6.96, 01.11.95 to 30.6.95 and 03.12.94 to June,95
respectively but there appears to be some over writing/
manipulation in the dates mentioned above. These Identity
Cards also do not specifically mentioned the period of
working days and hence, these are not acceptable. Exhibit-
N(33) , N(35), N(36), N(38) ,N(39) to N(40), N(44), N(49),
N(66), N(71) are the memorandum issued in favour of the
workmen Puneswar Borah, Prahlad Neog, Prafulla Saikia,
Rabul Neog, Biman Saikia, Devon Prasad Baruah, Ajit
Gohain, Ridip Borah, Ratul Sarmah and Mahendra Saikia
respectively, but on scrutiny it is seen that the dates of
working period are found tempered/ fabricated in all cases
and hence, these documents can not be accepted.
Exhibit-N(34) is the Identity Card issued in favour of the
workman Ajay Phukan but there is no mention of the
working period. Exhibit-N(37), N(41) to No.(43), N(47), N(48),
N(50), N(52), N(54) to N(59), N(63) to N(65), N(67) to N(70),
N(74), N(75), N(77), N(79), N(80) to N(88), N(90), N(92),
N(93), N(95) to N(102), N(107) and N(108) are the Identity
Cards issued in favour of the workmen Romen Bora, Nirmal
Neog, Ashok Bora, Dibeswar Chutia, Budheswar Dwora,
Tankeswar Saikia, Rajen Bora, Pulin Dutta, Robin Borgohain,
Romesh Gogoi, Bipul Bhuiya, Robi Borah, Rikeswar
Kochari, Nipul Saikia, Suresh Bora, Bibhu Charan Dutta,
Nayan Borah, Jitu Dutta, Romen Saikia, A. Kalita, Tapan
Bora, Ranjit Bora, Anil Kochari, Bipul Dwara, Amulya
Regon, Ridip Gogoi, Prabin Nagaria, Jyogeswar Mili, Gokul
Mili, Dul Borah, Rajib Saikia, Ajit Dutta, Ranjit Kr. Saikia,
Pranab Gogoi, Tapan Kakoti, Bipin Gogoi, Mridul Gogoi,
Dulu Bhuiya, Pabitra Dutta, Sujadul, Puna Gogoi, Ranjit
Rajkonwar, Makhon Neog, Pradip Bora, Nabajyoti Bora,
Padma Bora, respectively. On examination of these
documents it is found that in most of the Identity Cards the
dates of validity are found tempered and fabricated on the
face of those and in some of the documents the exact period
of validity have also not been mentioned. In such a situation
neither the aforesaid documents can be admitted nor any
opinion be formed in respect of the period of working of
the aforesaid workmen.
The Association has relied upon Exhibit-N(51) which
a list of off season workers issued by the Party Chief of GP-
33 it does not reflect any working days. Exhibit-N(60), is a
certificate issued in favour of the workman Prabin Ch. Borah
but there is no mention of period of work. The
Exhibit-N(61) is an experience certificate issued in the name
of the workman Suren Chutia showing the date of working
with effect from 9.11.84 to 15.7.85 but this certificate has
been written in different hand writing with different ink
also, as such, this certificate is also found doubtful. The
4104
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Exhibit-N(62) is a certificate issued in favour of the workman
Suren Chutia but the said certificate is found having without
any office seal as such, this so called experience certificate
cannot be accepted. Exhibit-N(72) is also a certificate issued
by the Party Chief of GP-36 in favour of Tankeswar Saikia
and this certificate also does not indicate any period of
work. The Exhibit-N(73) a list of workers who were engaged
during the off season in 1996 but there is no specific mention
of period of engagement.
The Association has also exhibited the Affidavits
marked as Exhibit-N(91) & N(94) sworn in by Sri Pranab
Gogoi and Sri Thaneswar Gogoi stating that they are known
as Bhogeswar Gogoi and Bepen Gogoi Respectively
without having any relevancy with the list of workers as
mentioned in the list appended with their claim statement
& hence these two documents are also found of no help to
the Association in connection with the calculation of
working days. The workman Witness No.1, Sri Jitumoni
Bora in his evidence clearly mentioned that altogether 87
numbers of workers have completed 240 days of work within
the relevant period of consecutive 12 months but the
supporting documents are found not at all acceptable and
reliable as observed above. In his cross-examination he
admitted that they have submitted a Writ Petition filed in
Civil Rule No.5744/97 vide Exhibit-1 wherein Exhibit-1(1) is
his signature. He also admitted the discrepancies made in
some of the entries in regard to the working period
mentioned in the documents annexed with Exhibit-1 and
those proved by him vide Exhibit-N(l) to Exhibit-N(109). He
categorically mentioned that he can not say who have
manipulated the said documents marked as Exhibit-N(l) to
Exhibit-N(109). Thus it is crystal clear that the documents
proved by the Association vide Exhibit-N(91) to Exhibit-
N(109) are found not acceptab1e in order to establish the
plea in order to justify their claim that all the workmen have
completed .240-days of service in 12 consecutive months
on the strength of the documents marked as Exhibit-N
series.
The Management Witness No.1 Sri Amit Kumar
Khulbe in his deposition categorically stated that the
seismic survey work is conducted in selected field which
begins towards beginning of November and ends before
the end of June next year; and none of the workers have
completed 240 days in a year. He also denied that all the
workers mentioned in the Annexure-A to the written
statement submitted by the Association were not the
workers of the said Association and most of them did not
work as contingent worker in ONGC since 1994. In support
of his contention the management witness No.1 has
submitted the Field Report of CDP seismic Survey vide
Exhibit-5 ( proved in original) for the field season 1992-93,
Exhibit-6 ( proved in original) is the operational report on
24/48 Fold CDP Reflection Survey for the season 1984-85;
Exhibit-7 ( Proved in original) is Operational Report on 48
Fold CDP Seismic Survey for the field season 1992-93;
Exhibit-8 ( proved in original), is the operational report on
48 Fold CDP seismic reflection survey for the field season
1993-94; Exhibit-9 (proved in original) the operational report
on 48 fold CDP seismic Reflection Survey for the field season
1994-95; Exhibit-10 (proved in original), the operational
report on 48 Fold CDP Reflection Survey for the field season
1994-95; Exhibit-11 (proved in original), the operational
report on 48 Fold CDP Seismic Survey for the field season
1991-92; Exhibit-12 (proved in original) operational report
on 48 Fold CDP Reflection Survey for the field season
1994-95. From the Exhibits-5 to Exhibits-12, it appears that
the field season started on 4.11.92 and closed on 2.5.93;
from 14.11.84 to 4.6.85; from 20.11.92 to 14.5.93; from 1.11.93
to 30.5.94; from 11.11.94 to 29.6.93; from 11.11.94 to 27.6.95;
from 17.10.91 to 27.5.92 and from 11.11.94 to 28.6.95
respectively. He also stated that the gate passes are issued
to the workers for various purposes and the same are issued
to the outsiders and the gate passes annexed by the
Association in the Written Statement are over written,
tempered and as such fabricated. The Management witness
No.2 Shri Ram Chandra Mishra categorically pointed out
that he was posted as Party Chief in ONGC, Jorhat with
effect from May,1993 to December, 1994 and was transferred
to Kolkata office on 29.5.95 and hence the signature
contained in Annexure N/1 of Exhibit-A is his own
signatures but the dates are manipulated. He also said that
the period of service in Anexure-N/l, N/36 are also
manipulated. From the discussion of evidence of workman
witness No.1 and Management witness No.1 & 2 as regards
period of 240 days of work in 12 consecutive months in
respect of the workmen as claimed by the Association it is
revealed that the document marked as Exhibit-N(l) to
Exhibit-N(109) which are the solitary supporting testimony
relied upon by the workers Association are not admissible
in law and even the testimony of the W.W.l is found not
reliable. Moreover, all the documents marked as Exhibit-N(l)
to Exhibit-N(109) are found not genuine, trustworthy and
free from doubts. On the other hand, the evidence of the
Management witness is found untwisted unshaken rather
supported by the documents relied upon by him.
11. Mr. S.Das, learned Advocate for the workmen
submitted that the workmen have been working under the
management of ONGC for long period and most of them
have completed 240 days of work within 12 consecutive
months but the management with a view to deprive the
workmen to be regularized made some artificial breaks
although they were engaged during the whole year and
even they were allowed to work under roof in the rainy
season. He also pointed out that the management simply
denied the contention of the workers and they have
suppressed the real fact for which they did not produce
the Attendance Register and Pay Roll of the workers.
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4105
Mr. P.K. Roy, learned Advocate for the Management, on
the other hand, vehemently opposing the contention of
Mr. S.Das, learned Advocate for the Association submitted
that it is the onus on the part of the workmen to stand on
their own leg in order to establish their pleadings; the
Association neither called for the record nor did produce
any authentic documents in support of their claims. Mr.
Roy also submitted that the Association have not come
with clean hand in order to secure equity since the
documents submitted by them vide Exhibit-N series are all
fabricated and tempered and as such, they are not entitled
to any relief. In this context Mr. Roy cited the decisions
held in Range Forest Officer-vrs-S.T.Hadimani reported in
(2002) 3 SCC 25, wherein it was observed that where the
workman’s claim that he had worked for more than 240
days in the year preceding his termination was denied by
the employer it is for the claimant to lead evidence to that
effect; and that the workmen’s affidavit was not sufficient
evidence for that purpose. He also brought to my notice
the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in BSNL& Ors.
vs-Mohesh Chand reported in(2008) 3 SCC 474 that the
legal position reiterated that initial onus is on the \workman
to prove that he worked for240 days in a year. Considering
the evidence adduced by both the sides and having regard
to the ratio of the cases cited by the learned Counsels I
find no force in the argument of Mr. S. Das, learned
Advocate for the Association.
12. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in their order dated
10.11.08 passed in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 3278
of 2007 directed this Tribunal to consider the case of those
workers who claimed to have completed 240 days of work
within a period of 12 consecutive months and also fulfilled
the conditions for regularization. It appears from the
pleadings of both the sides that both the parties relied
upon the Standing Order for contingent employees of the
ONGC (proved by the workmen as Exhibit-B) regarding
regularization of the workmen which was framed under
the Provision of Industrial Employment (Standing order)
Act,1946. Clause 2(ii) of the said Standing Order, provided
that the workman who has been on the Roll of the
Commission and has put in not less than 180 days of
attendance in any period of 12 months shall be a temporary
workman, provided that a temporary workman who has put
not less than 240 days of work in any period of 12
consecutive months and who possess the minimum
qualification prescribed by the Commission may be
considered for conversion as regular employee. Clause-
2(i) of the Certified Standing Orders as aforesaid laid down
the classification of workmen as the contingent employees
shall hereafter be classified as temporary and casual while
Sub-Clause-III of Clause-2 provided that the workman who
is neither temporary nor regular shall be considered as
casual workman. The Association also relied upon the
Office order No. 103(98)/67-ENT dated 1.8.67 issued by the
Assistant Director on behalf of the Director of
Administration ONGC (Enclosed as Annexure-A series with
the Additional Written Statement submitted by the
Association) and No.27(70)/87-IR dated 16.7.1991 issued
by the General Manager (Personnel), ONGC, wherein it has
been stipulated that the contingent workers may be
absorbed against the regular posts provided :-
(a) They have completed 240 working days service in the
Commission in the 12 consecutive months;
(b) They are registered with the Employment Exchange;
(c) They are held against regular posts;
(d) They possess requisite qualifications and experience
etc., laid down in the Recruitment Regulation of ONGC.
13. The Management in their W.S. as well as
evidence on oath categorically stated that the contingent
workers were appointed by them without considering their
requisite qualification nor on being recommended by the
local Employment Exchange; and the said contingent
workers were engaged for doing some unskilled and non-
perennial nature of work. The workman witness No.1 in his
evidence mentioned that the work done by the workman
was perennial in nature and they are having requisite
qualification but there is nothing on record to show that
the workmen were discharging the function of perennial in
nature and there requisite qualification for the posts held
by them. There is also no iota of evidence to show that the
workmen were appointed against any regular vacancy and
they were recommended by the local employment exchange.
In course of argument Mr. P.K.Roy, learned Advocate for
the Management submitted that the nature of work
discharged by the members of the contingent workers
Association are purely temporary and unskilled and they
are also not engaged against any regular vacancy and they
rendered services as casual employees for a particular
period i.e. during the field season which starts from the
month of November and closed on the first part of June
and as such, they are not entitled to regularization as
claimed. In support of his contention Mr. P.K.Roy, relied
upon the case in Secretary, State of Karnataka and ors—
vs- Umadevi(3) and Ors. (2006) 4 SCC. 1 wherein it was
observed that while, directing the appointment, temporary
or casual, be regularized or made permanent, the Courts are
swayed by the fact that the person concerned has worked
for some time and in some cases for a considerable length
of time; such an argument fails when tested on the
touchstone of constitutionality and equality of opportunity
enshrined in Article 14 of the Constitution; merely because
a temporary employee or a casual wage worker is continued
for a time beyond the term of his appointment, he would
not be entitled to be absorbed in regular service or made
permanent merely on the strength of such continuance, if
the original appointment was not made by following due
process of selection as envisaged by the relevant Rules. It
is also mentioned by their Lordship that it is not as if the
4106
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
person who accepted an engagement neither temporary
nor casual in nature is not aware of the nature of his
employment; he accepts the employment with open eyes.
It was further observed in Umadevi’s Case that Article 309
of the Constitution contemplated the drawing up of a
procedure and Rules to regulate the recruitment and
regulate the service conditions of appointees appointed to
Public Services Post in connection with the affairs of the
Union or in of the State; and the State being a Model
Employer enacted the EMPLOYMENT EXCHANGE
(COMPULSORY NOTIFICATION OF VACANCY)
ACT,1959 to ensure equal opportunity for employment
seeker which place obligation on the employer to notify
the vacancy that may arise in the various departments and
those vacancies based on the procedure. Mr. Roy, learned
Advocate for the management also relied upon the decision
laid down in Official Liquidator -vrs- Dayanand and Ors
published in (2008) 10 SCC 1.
14. The evidence on record shows that the
contingent workers were engaged by the Management for
the works to be done for field season i.e. for a particular
period & they were not appointed against any regular
vacancy notifying the Employment Exchange by the
employer, nor they could fulfill the other conditions for
regularization stipulated in the Certified Standing Order as
well as the Office Order issued by the ONGC from time to
time’as mentioned above. Further there is nothing on record
to show that the qualification of the workers were examined
by the management at the time of their engagement also
there is no evidence to show that the contingent workers
were appointed against regular vacancies.
15. During the course of the argument Mr. S.Das,
learned Advocate for the Association took the plea that
the Management in order to deprive the members of the
contingent workers Association, indulge in unfair labour
practice by adopting the Contract Labour System for doing
the works done by the workers Association through the
Contract labourers which is against the Principle of Law
and hence the Management should be restrained from
engaging the contract Labour and also to quash the Tender
Notice No. ER/MM/GSD/39/97-98 issued by the Dy.
General Manager (MM), Exploration Business Group,
ONGC, Sibsagar. He also added that the Management of
ONGC also followed the unfair Policy of giving some
artificial/ frictional breaks besides arbitrary, in order to
disentitled the workers from getting regularization. In this
connection Mr. Das, learned Advocate cited the decision
laid down in Division Forest Officer, Salooni, Chamba -
VRS - Singh reported in (2013 (137) FLR 100 H.P that
the State being welfare State could not indulge in unfair
labour practice to give artificial/ frictional break besides
arbitrary was also unreasonable and shortage of few days
should have been condoned. Hence Mr. Das learned
Advocate contended that the said tender Notice is liable
to be set aside and the members of the Field Party
Contingent Workers Association as mentioned in List
marked as Exhibit-A are entitled to be regularized.
16. Mr. P.K Roy, vehemently objected to the
submission of the learned Advocate for the Association
stating that the Management in pursuance of the new
Policy adopted by the Government regarding exploration
of Oil and Natural Gas in the Country and with a view to
resist in the competitive market, adopted different policies
for minimizing their establishment expenditure and to earn
profit by utilizing experts and skilled persons and also to
engage sophisticated as well as modern technique of
exploration followed the measures of restricting the
creation of posts and also abolishing some of the posts
by providing VRS Schemes; inviting for the Bids in the
market for procuring the service of labour through
contractor and as such there is no illegality on the part of
the Management in issuing the tender notice. He also
added that the Hon’ble Gauhati High Court as well as the
Apex Court in their Judgment passed in Civil Rule No.
5744/97, SLP(Civil) No.3278 of 2007 did not grant any
relief of quashing the Tender Notice published by the
Management as prayed for by the workmen; and hence
this Tribunal can not consider this prayer of the workmen
at this stage. Considering the above circumstances and
the submission of learned Advocates for both the sides as
well as having regard to the judgment and order passed by
the Hon’ble Gauhati High Court in Writ Petition being
Civil
Rule
No.
5744/97,
Writ
Appeal
No. 352/98 and SLP (Civil) No. 3278 of 2007, I find no
scope to entertain the claim of the Association as regards
quashing of the Tender Notice No. ER/MM/GSD/39/97-
98 issued by the Dy. General Manager (MM), Exploration
Business Group, ONGC, Sibsagar.
17. In view of my finding as well as the discussion
as above it can safely be held that the ONGC Field Party
Contingent Workers Association has miserably failed to
establish their claim that they have completed 240 days
of work within 12 consecutive months, also they could
not prove that they have fulfilled the other criterion for
regularisition as contemplated in the Certified Standing
Order of ONGC and Office orders/Memorandum issued
by the ONGC from time to time. Accordingly, I find no
hesitation to come to a conclusion that ONGC Field Party
Contingent Workers Association have failed to establish
their claim for regularisation and as such they are not
entitled to any relief.
18. In the result, this Reference is answered in
negtive against the ONGC Field Party Contingent
Workers Association.
Send the Award to the Government of India as per
procedure.
Given under my han d and seal of this Court on this
31st day of May, 2013, at Guwahati.
L. C. DEY, Presiding Officer
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4107
ubZ fnYyh] 2 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1546-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ ,l- lh-
lh- ,y- ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds
chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV (la[;k 25@2008)
dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 02&07&2013 dks
izkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹iQk- la- ,y& 22013@1@2013&vkbZ vkj(lh&IIº
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 2nd July, 2013
S.O. 1546.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central
Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,
Hyderabad (No. 25/2008) as shown in the Annexure, in the
Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the
management of SCCL and their workmen, which was
received by the Central Government on 02-07-2013.
[ F. No. L-22013/1/2013-IR(C-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AT HYDERABAD
PRESENT : Smt. M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer
Dated the 22nd day of May, 2013
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L. C. NO. 25/2008
Between :
Sri Bhuddavaram Giridhar,
S/o Sampath Kumar,
C/o Smt. A. Sarojana, Advocate,
Flat No. G7, Ground Floor,
Rajeshwari Gayatri Sadan,
Opp: Badruka Jr. College for Girls,
Kachiguda, Hyderabad.
. . .Petitioner
AND
1.
The General Manager,
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
Mandamarri Area, Mandamarri
Adilabad District.
2.
The Superintendent of Mines,
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
Kasipeta Mine, Mandamarri Area,
Mandamarri. Adilabad District. . . . Respondents
APPEARANCES:
For the Petitioner: M/s. A. Sarojana & K. Vasudeva
Reddy, Advocates
For the Respondent: Sri M.V. Hanumantha Rao,
Advocate
AWARD
Petitioner, Sri Bhuddavaram Giridhar who has been
working as a badli filler for the M/s. Singareni Collieries
Company Ltd., filed this petition invoking Sec.2A(2) of
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 seeking for declaring the
impugned order No.MMR/PER/D/072/4269 dated 7-8-2005
issued by the first respondent as illegal and arbitrary and
to set aside the same consequently direction the
respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service duly
granting all other consequential benefits such as continuity
of service, back wages and all other attendant benefits.
2. The averments made in the petition in brief are as follows:
Petitioner was appointed as badli filler in 1999 and
since then till the year 2002 he was regular to his duties.
During the year 2003 his leg got fractured accidentally and
further he suffered other family problems. A charge sheet
dated 29-12-2004 was issued alleging that petitioner
remained absent during the year 2003 which amounts to
misconduct under company standing order 25.25. He
submitted his explanation explaining his inability to perform
his duties regularly during that year but without considering
the same an enquiry was conducted with a predetermined
notion. During that enquiry petitioner was not given any
opportunity much less valid in nature. Basing on such lop
sided enquiry the enquiry officer held the charges as proved.
Basing on the erroneous findings of the enquiry officer
show cause notice dated 17.4.2005 was issued to which
petitioner submitted his reply. However, without considering
the merits of the same he was dismissed from service, with
effect from 18.8.2005 vide office order dated 7-8-2005.
Petitioner could not attend to his duties regularly during
the year 2003 only on account of his ill-health and other
family problems. He submitted the same to his authorities
time and again and also pleaded that he will attend the
duty without absence in future, but the same were not
considered. The action of the respondents in dismissing
the petitioner from service is wholly illegal, arbitrary,
violative of principles of natural justice. The enquiry was
not properly conducted. The procedure of enquiry was
not explained to the petitioner. He was not offered the
assistance of any defence assistant. Thus, he could not
effectively participate in the enquiry and he could not mark
the medical and other documents on his behalf to prove
his ill health. Though he has shown all the prescriptions
and other records pertaining to his continued ill health,
none of them were marked by the enquiry officer. The
submissions made by the petitioner were ignored on the
pretext that he could not substantiate his claim with relevant
4108
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
proof. As a result of the improper conduct of enquiry great
prejudice is resulted to the petitioner. He was not given
opportunity to produce his witnesses. The enquiry officer
relied upon the evidence of irrelevant witnesses who got
no personal knowledge of the charge alleged against the
petitioner and the documents which were neither shown
nor furnished to the petitioner either before or during the
enquiry and which are also not establishing the charge
alleged. No valid reasons are given for his findings by the
enquiry officer. The enquiry officer grossly erred in holding
the charges as proved. The enquiry officer and the
Disciplinary Authority proceeded with a preconceived
notion as if petitioner accepted the charges alleged, which
is not correct. The enquiry proceeding were not held in the
language known to the petitioner. The findings of
Disciplinary Authority are out side the scope of the charge
sheet as such the impugned order of dismissal order dated
7-8-2005 is liable to be treated as bad in law. Petitioner is
the sole bread winner of the family consisting of old aged
ailing parents, grant parents, wife and children. As a result
of petitioner's dismissal from service his family is rendered
without any livelihood. Petitioner could not attend to his
duties during the year 2003 only on account of his ill health
and family problems. Even otherwise the punishment of
dismissal from service is too harsh, excessive and
disproportionate to the charges alleged. Petitioner has not
gainfully employed elsewhere from the date of dismissal.
Without admitting the charges alleged against the petitioner
even if they are rightly held to be proved, petitioner craves
indulgence of this court to modify the punishment to any
other lesser punishment so as to survive himself and to
look after the family. Hence the petition.
4. Respondents filed their counter with averments in brief
as follows:
Petitioner has not followed the proper procedure to
entertain the industrial dispute, by straight away
approaching the court without seeking for conciliation.
The state amendment is not applicable to the Central
Government undertakings. Petitioner was dismissed from
service with effect from 18-8-2005, whereas he raised the
dispute in the year 2008 without explaining the reasons for
delay. Thus, the petition is liable to be dismissed for want
of maintainability, delay and latches. Petitioner was
dismissed from service on proved charge of absenteeism
after conducting a detailed domestic enquiry duly following
the principles of natural justice. Petitioner was initially
appointed as floating badli filler on 23-7-99 and continued
to be so till the date of his dismissal. His contention that he
was regular to the duties till the year 2002 is denied. His
other contention that in the year 2003 he sustained fracture
to his leg accidentally and suffered other family problems
is also denied. During the course of enquiry petitioner
submitted one OP ticket No.10508 from Area Hospital,
Ramakrishanpur for the period from 17-4-2003 to 21-10-2003.
Even during this period he remained absent at the hospital
from 18-6-2003 to 20-10-2003. When he was being extended
treatment at Colliery Hospital he should have continued
treatment and there was no need for his to be absent from
treatment. Hence, the period form 18-6-2003 to 20-10-2003
shall also be deemed as unauthorized absenteeism and it
can not be accounted as sick period. The period from
17-4-2003 to 17-6-2003 was not treated as absenteeism and
not included in the charge sheet. During the year 2003
petitioner has put in 10 musters only excluding the sick
period and remained unauthorisedly on all other days which
constitutes misconduct under respondent company's
Standing Orders 25.25 which reads as.
“25.25:- Habitual late attendance or habitual absence from
duty without sufficient cause. ”
Petitioner stated in his written statement that he
suffered fracture to his leg in April, 2003, under gone
treatment in area hospital Ramakarishnapur and in a private
hospital and assured to be regular to duties. But, he did
not submit any medical reports, prescription slips for the
alleged treatment he has under gone. He failed to
communicate his inability to attend duties to the unit level
authorities or to the area level Management as he was
supposed to do. He did not post any information at all.
Further, if he ought not to have absented from area hospital,
Ramakrishnapur. If he wants to be away from hospital, he
should have obtained prior permission from hospital
superintendent. Even after being declared fit for duty, he
was not regular to duties. His attendance before the
accident too is not satisfactory. In the year 2004 he put in
just 43 musters. Thus, his contention that he was not regular
to duties due to the fracture of the leg is not correct.
Petitioner claims that though he explained the reason for
his inability to attend duties, the merit of the same were not
considered and that with a pre-determined notion the
enquiry was conducted are all incorrect. Petitioner was
given every opportunity to defend his case, to submit
witnesses and to record evidence in his support and to
cross examine the witnesses examined on behalf of the
Management, during the enquiry. His contention that it is
a lop sided enquiry is incorrect. His further contention that
he was dismissed from service without considering merits
of his submissions is also incorrect. By giving full and fair
opportunity to the petitioner, in compliance of the principles
of natural justice, the enquiry was conducted and
disciplinary action was taken against him. The petitioner's
attendance to the duties, indicates that after issuance of
charge sheet and even before issuance of the charge sheet,
he was not regular to duties. Being a badli filler and an
under ground employee he was expected to put in minimum
190 musters per year. But he failed to do so. For the
absenteeism of the petitioner during the year 2002 he was
issued with a charge sheet and a punishment of reversion
to a lower stage by reducing to Special Piece Rate Allowance
by 02 with effect from 1.10.2002 was imposed. Despite giving
opportunity petitioner failed to correct himself, which
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4109
compelled the respondent to dismiss him from service. Since
petitioner is being below ‘C’ grade 1st respondent is
empowered to impose the penalty of dismissal against him
and it does not require approval from higher authorities.
Petitioner neither disputed the enquiry proceeding nor
objected for the presentation of the pay sheet clerk during
the course of enquiry. He did not cross examine the
Management witnesses when opportunity was extended
to him. The enquiry officer duly considered the oral and
documentary evidence adduced on record and gave his
reasoned finding. Petitioner failed to show as to why these
findings are not valid. The contention that findings of the
Disciplinary Authority are outside the scope of the charge
is also not correct. If any of the employees of the respondent
company whose work is inter linked and inseparable
remained absent it will affect the production results. Thus,
if anyone remains absent without prior leave or without
any justified cause it prejudices the interests of the
respondent company as it creates sudden void which at
times is very difficult to fill up. There will be no proper
planning and the already planned schedules suddenly get
disturbed, if there is no prior notice. That is the reason the
why respondent company is compelled to take serious
action on the unauthorized absence. Petitioner has put in
033, 103, 003, and 043 and nil musters in 1999, 2001, 2002,
2004 and upto 31-7-2005 respectively when he was expected
to put in minimum 190 musters in a calendar year. As such,
respondent company was constrained to dismiss him from
service. In view of the binding legal precedents governing
this area also the respondent's action in this regard is
justifiable. Petition is liable to be dismissed.
5.
During the course of the present case proceedings,
for petitioner a memo has been filed conceding the validity
of domestic enquiry. Thereon the domestic enquiry has
been held to be valid by virtue ofthe order dated 5-2-2010.
6.
Ex.Wl and EX.Ml to M11 were marked with the
consent of the either party.
7.
Heard the arguments of either party.
8. The points for determination :
1.
Whether the respondent's action in issuing the
impugned order No.MMR/PER/D/072/4269 dated 7.8.2005
is legal and justified?
2.
To what relief he is entitled?
9. Point No (1) : As already observed above, the
petitioner conceded as to the validity of domestic enquiry
which lead to the order of this court holding that the said
domestic enquiry as valid. Thus, the voluminous pleading
on the part of the petitioner disputing with the correctness
of the procedure followed during the course of conducting
of the domestic enquiry and the alleged prejudice occurred
to him due to such alleged lapses, need not be considered.
When once petitioner concedes that the domestic enquiry
has been validly held, there is no need for reopening the
said matter.
10. Thus, the thing which remained to be considered
now on the pleadings of either party, is regarding, the
validity of the proceedings of the Disciplinary Authority
only. Accordingly, court heard either party, for the purpose
of Sec.11A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Thus, it is
to be verified whether the punishment awarded to the
petitioner by the Disciplinary Authority is proper, valid,
justifiable and in proportion to the charge alleged and
proved against him.
11. It is the contention of the petitioner that he could
not attend to the duties during the year 2003 regularly as
he suffered leg fracture accidentally during April, 2003 and
was under treatment from Area Hospital and also in private
hospitals. Apart from that he also prayed that he suffered
from some family problems. As to his sustaining leg fracture
and under going treatment in area hospital, is concerned
evidently, the respondents are not seriously disputing. It
is the contention of the respondents themselves that
considering the fracture injury sustained by the petitioner,
the sick period from 17.4.2003 to 17.6.2003 was not treated
as absenteeism and was not included in charge sheet. That
means, they are conscious of the fact that petitioner
sustained fracture injury to his leg and was under prolonged
treatment. Therefore, the contention of the petitioner that
he suffered fracture injury and was required prolonged
treatment is concerned it can be taken as an established
fact.
12. According to the Petitioner he was taking treatment
from private hospitals also. No doubt no documentary
evidence was produced to substantiate the same. But the
fact remains that a fracture injury requires a very prolonged
treatment and when a person suffers from a leg fracture, for
him to be able to walk normally even, he will be needing
substantial time. Thus, the absenteeism of the petitioner
which followed his accidentally sustaining leg fracture
injury is to be looked upon with due consideration.
13. As can be seen the from the material on record,
the enquiry report and other documents could not be served
on the petitioner personally, as he was not available and
after a publication was made in the news paper, he received
the same and has given an explanation stating that due to
fracture injury and consequent treatment in medical
hospitals he could not attend to the duty regularly and
promising that he would attend to duty regularly in future
if he is given an opportunity. The Disciplinary Authority
found that the said explanation is not satisfactory and
further accepting the fmdings of the enquiry officer and
taking that there are no extenuating circumstances to take
a lenient view in the matter, dismissed the petitioner from
services with effect from 18-8-2005 by virtue of the order
dated 7-8-2005 i.e., the impugned order.
14. As can be seen from the order of the Disciplinary
Authority referred to above, the Disciplinary Authority
has considered only the misconduct alleged in the charge
sheet dated 29-12-2004 basing on which the enquiry has
4110
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
been held against the petitioner for his unauthorized
absence during the year 2003. Whereas respondents have
pleaded about the various events of unauthorized absence
on the part of the petitioner, which never formed part of the
impugned disciplinary proceedings.
15. In the counter filed by the respondents a plea is
put forth regarding the previous misconduct and awarding
of punishment for the same to the petitioner. But no
supporting documents were filed to prove the same. Further
more, there is no reference of any such punishment in the
above referred order of the Disciplinary Authority.
16. No opportunity has been given to the petitioner
regarding the aggravated form of punishment, by assigning
reasons for the same either, as his previous conduct which
lead to imposition of earlier punishment or any such
analogous aspects. Thus there has been no opportunity
for the petitioner to verify the correctness of the reasons
which lead to the aggravated form of the punishment
imposed against him at any time prior to imposition of the
same and to state his pleas regarding punishment to be
imposed. Only in the counter filed before this court,
respondents pleaded about the previous conduct of the
petitioner, for the first time. Thus, it can not be taken as a
justified conduct on the part of the respondents.
17. When the documents produced on record are
considered one can reasonably understand that
considering the absenteeism of the petitioner during the
year 2003 alone, he has been dismissed from service in
spite of the fact that during the said year he suffered leg
fracture and has under gone prolonged medical treatment.
As per standing orders 25.25 ofthe respondent company,
only when there is a habitual absence from duty that too
without sufficient cause, it amounts to misconduct which
attracts punishment. In the present case, there is prolonged
absence from duty on the part of the petitioner. But it can
not be said that it is totally without sufficient cause. During
that period he suffered fracture to his leg accidentally and
under gone prolonged medical treatment. But, the fact
remains that he failed to intimate the concerned authorities,
regarding his inability to attend to the duties. It can not be
said that he was not in a position to pass on such
information. His conduct, in remaining absent from duty
without intimation and permission from the concerned
authorities, certainly would have resulted into substantial
prejudice to the interests of the respondent. Thus,
petitioner is certainly liable for punishment but in the given
circumstances, it shall not be dismissal from service.
18. The Standing Orders of the respondent company
spell out several punishments for the misconducts. The
last and gravest punishment provided for, is dismissal from
service. Thus, only for the persons who are incorrigible in
all respects, such is the punishment to be awarded, but not
to the case like petitioner, who could make out some
plausible reason for his remaining absent from duties during
the year 2003. But, as it can not be said that his conduct is
beyond re- proof altogether owing to the fact that he failed
to take prior permission/sanction of leave appropriate
punishment is to be imposed against him.
19. In view of the fore gone discussion, it can safely
be concluded that the punishment of dismissal of the
petitioner from service by virtue of impugned order dated
7-8-2005 passed by the 1st respondent is not maintainable.
But, as the conduct of the petitioner in remaining absent
from duty for long duration without intimation/sanction of
leave which would certainly resulted into prejudice to the
interests of the respondent company, appropriate
alternative punishment is to be imposed,by way of
modifying the punishment of dismissal from service imposed
againust him. On due consideration of the nature of the
misconduct for which the punishment is awarded and the
circumstances which the lead the Petitioner to commit such
misconduct, one can see that the reasonable punishment
to be awarded is stoppage of one increment with cumulative
effect only.
This point is answered accordingly.
20. In the result, petition is allowed. The impugned
order dated 7-8-2005 where under first respondent imposed
the punishment, dismissing the petitioner from the services
ofthe respondent company w.e.f. 18-8-2005 is hereby set
aside. Instead, the petitioner is awarded with the punishment
of stoppage of one increment with cumulative effect.
Petitioner shall be reinstated into service with immediate
effect, but he shall not be entitled for any back wages. He
is entitled for all other attendant benefits.
Award passed accordingly. Transmit.
Dictated to Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant
transcribed by her corrected by me on this the 22nd day of
May, 2013.
M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer
Appendix of evidence
Witnesses examined
Witnesses examined for the
for the Petitioner
Respondent
NIL
NIL
Documents marked for the Petitioner
Ex. Wl: Dismissal order dated 7-8-2005
Documents marked for the Respondent
EX. Ml: Office copy of charge sheet dt. 29-l2-2004
EX. M2: Explanation of the Petitioner to the charge sheet.
EX. M3: Office copy of enquiry notice dt.18-l-2005
EX. M4: Enquiry proceedings dt.22-l-2005
EX. M5: Enquiry report dt. 2l-2-2005
EX. M6: Office copy of lr. No.MMR/PER/D/072/2130
dt.17-4-2005
EX. M7: Undelivered cover with ack. for EX.M6
dt.30-4-2005
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4111
EX. M8: News paper notification in Andhra Jyothi daily
dt.5-7-2005
EX. M9: Acknowledgement dt.11-7-2005 for lr. No.MMR/
PER/D/ 072/2130 dt.17-4-2005
EX.Ml 0: Representation of the Petitioner.
EX. M11 : Dismissal order dated 7-8-2005.
ubZ fnYyh] 2 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1547-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ ,l- lh-
lh- ,y- ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds
chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 70@2007)
dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 02&07&2013 dks
izkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹iQk- la- ,y& 22013@1@2013&vkbZ vkj(lh&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 2nd July, 2013
S.O. 1547.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947 ), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central
Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,
Hyderabad (70/2007) as shown in the Annexure, in the
industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the
management of SCCL and their workmen, received by the
Central Government on 02-07-2013
[ F. No. L-22013/1/2013-IR(C-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT
AT HYDERABAD
PRESENT : Smt. M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI Presiding Officer
Dated the 29th day of May, 2013
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L. C. NO. 70/2007
Between :
Sri Rentala Murali,
S/o Kamel,
C/o Smt. A. Sarojana, Advocate,
Flat No. G7, Ground Floor,
Rajeshwari Gayatri Sadan,
Opp: Badruka Jr. College for Girls,
Kachiguda, Hyderabad.
.....Petitioner
AND
1. The General Manager,
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
Sreerampur(Projects) Area,
Sreerampur, Adilabad District.
2. The Colliery Manager/Superintendent of Mines,
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
1K 1A Incline, Sreeramput Area.
Adilabad district
. .. ..Respondents
APPEARANCES :
For the Petitioner:
M/s. A. Sarojana & K. Vasudeva
Reddy, Aavocates
For the Respondent:
Sri M.V. Hanumanata Rao,
Advocate
AWARD
This is a petition under Sec.2 A (2) of the I.D. Act,
1947 filed by the petitioner who worked as coal filler at IK
incline of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Limited
invoking seeking for declaring the impugned order
No.SRP(P)/P(IR)/35A/2K/938 dated 30-5-2000 issued by
first respondent as illegal and arbitrary and set aside the
same consequently directing the respondent to reinstate
the petitioner into
2. The averments made in the petition in brief are as follows:
Petitioner was appointed as badli filler on 11-4-1987
and confirmed as coal filler. He has been regular to his
duties till the year 1996. During the year 1997, as he suffered
with typhoid fever for which respondent company put him
in sick list from 20-8-1987 to 30-9-97 and also as his daughter
suffered ill health during that year which required him to
take her to various hospitals and also her being expired
unfortunately, petitioner was compelled not to be regular
to his duties. A charge sheet dated 30.-3-1998 was issued
alleging that petitioner was irregular to his duties during
the year 1997 which amounts to misconduct under
company’s Standing Orders No.25.25. He submitted his
explanation on 4-4-1998 giving the reasons for his inability
for attending the duties during the year 1997. Without
considering merits of his submissions enquiry was
conducted with a predetermined notion. During the enquiry
he was not given any opportunity much less valid in nature.
Basing on such lopsided enquiry, enquiry officer held the
charges as proved. Basing on such erroneous findings
Disciplinary Authority issued show cause notice dated
25-9-1998. Petitioner submitted his reply on 3-10-1998.
Without considering merits of the same he was dismissed
from service, vide the order dated 30-5-2000. The whole
enquiry was conducted in a routine and mechanical manner
with pre-determined intention to dismiss the petitioner from
service. First respondent failed to apply his mind
independently while passing the impugned order. Before
commencement of the enquiry, the enquiry procedure was
not explained to the petitioner and he was not offered the
assistance of the defence assistant. As he was not aware
of the enquiry procedure petitioner could not participate in
the enquiry effectively. Though the petitioner has shown
all the prescriptions and records which can substantiate
his defence regarding his ill-health and the ill-health of his
daughter, none of them were marked by the enquiry
officer and the enquiry officer ignored the submissions
4112
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
made by the petitioner at the end of the enquiry on the
pretext that petitioner could not substantiate his claim
with relevant proofs. It all happened due to improper
conduct of the enquiry and petitioner suffered great
prejudice. Approval of competent authority was not
obtained prior to passing the impugned order. No
opportunity was given to the petitioner to produce the
witnesses. Neither the findings of the enquiry officer nor
the impugned order does give any reasons much less valid
in nature. The enquiry officer and Disciplinary Authority
proceeded with misconceived notion that petitioner
admitted his guilt. The enquiry was not held in the language
known to the petitioner. Petitioner was not supplied with
any documents on which the enquiry officer placed his
reliance. Even the said documents do not establish guilt
of the petitioner. Subsequent to the issuance of the
impugned order, Management of M/s. Singareni Collieries
Company Limited conducted interviews for the workmen
who were dismissed from service on account of
absenteeism. In response petitioner also applied for the
same and attended the interview. He pleaded that as a result
of his dismissal from service, he and his family members
are facing hardships and starvation. He also assured the
Management that he would be regular to his duties, if he
is given re-appointment. But he was not given
re-appointment. He is the sole bread winner of his family
consisting of aged mother, wife and two children. Since
he was dismissed from service, his whole family rendered
without any livelihood. Punishment of dismissal from
service is too harsh, excessive and disproportionate to
the charges alleged. Petitioner’s inability to be regular to
his duties during the year 1997 was only on account of
his and his daughter’s ill health and family troubles but
not otherwise. On account of his financial stringencies
he could not approach the court earlier. With great
difficulty present petition is filed. Delay occurred due to
that reason only.
3. Resoondent's filed a counter with averments in
brief as follows:
Petitioner approached the court directly without
complying with the mandatory pre-requisite of the
conciliation. There are delay and latches on the part of
the petitioner in approaching the court. For these reasons
petition ought to have been dismissed in limini.
Petitioner’s contention that he suffered with typhoid fever
in the year 1997 is not correct. He is to be put to strict
proof that in the year 1997 his daughter also suffered ill-
health and he was to take her to various hospitals. No
single document is filed to prove all these contentions.
Since the explanation of the petitioner dated 4.4.98 to
the charge sheet issued to him was not satisfactory, the
enquiry was held. During the enquiry petitioner was given
full and fair opportunity basing on the enquiry, the enquiry
officer held the charges as proved. Thereafter, show cause
notice dated 25-9-98 was issued to the petitioner. For it
petitioner submitted his reply on 3-10-1998. Thereafter
on duly considering the merits of the submissions made
by the petitioner impugned order was passed. During the
enquiry petitioner did not file even a single document to
prove the ill health of himself and his daughter. Petitioner
attended the counseling on 27-8-1999 and assured the
Management in wiring that hence forth he would work
regularly but, even after the counseling he did not improve
his attendance, he was quite irregular to his duties. The
enquiry was conducted following the principles of natural
justice. Petitioner fully participated in it. The enquiry
procedure was duly explained to him. Petitioner has been
given sufficient opportunity to produce his witnesses after
explaining the procedure of the enquiry. Impugned order
is a well reasoned order. Petitioner expressed that he got
no objection to conduct the proceedings in English. All
the documents which were relied upon during the enquiry
were shown to the petitioner. Petitioner does not come
within the guide lines of reinstatement of the workmen
who were dismissed from service. Hence, he was not
reinstated. Punishment of dismissal from service is
neither harsh nor excessive nor disproportionate to the
charges leveled in this case as per the settled law. First
respondent is competent to issue the impugned order
without approval of any other authority. Petitioner is to
be put to strict proof that on account of his financial
stringencies he could not file the petition earlier. Petition
is liable to be dismissed.
4. During course of the present case proceedings
petitioner got filed a memo conceding the validity of
domestic enquiry held by the respondent company. There
on by virtue of the order dated 29-1-2009 this court held
the domestic enquiry held by the respondent is to be
treated as valid.
5. Both the parties were heard u/s 11 A of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. EX.Wl and EX.Ml to M8
were marked with the consent of either parties.
6. The pointes raised for determination are :
1. Whether the impugned order No. dated is liable
to be set aside, if so on what grounds?
2. Whether the petitioner is entitled to any relief?
3. To what relief?
7. Point (1) : It is an admitted fact that Petitioner
absented himself from duty during the period mentioned
in the charge sheet leveled against him. Ex.Ml is the charge
sheet dated 30-3-1998, Ex.M2 is the representation given
by the Petitioner in answer to Ex.Ml charge sheet,
whereunder he categorically admitted regarding his
absence from duty during the given period but he explained
the reasons for his absence stating that during the year
1997 due to extreme unavoidable circumstances like his
five years old daughter becoming seriously ill and
hospitalized and after prolonged treatment her being
expired on 7-1-1998. He said that the said child was
admitted in the Area hospital, Bellampally and there itself
she died and that as he was looking after his ailing child,
who was so seriously ill, he could not attend to his duties
regularly and further due to the mental shock suffered by
him on account of demise of his child he himself suffered
illness and was under medical treatment. He further stated
that due to the distance which he was to cover to attend to
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4113
his duties after attending his ailing child at Bellampally
hospital, he was unable to attend duties regularly. He
categorically pleaded in Ex.M2 that the absence from duty
on his part, was never intentional and that it was due to the
circumstances mentioned above and promised that he
would more carefully attend to his duties in future.
8. Inspite of the above referred representation made
by the Petitioner, respondents have not got satisfied and a
regular departmental enquiry was conducted against the
Petitioner. Petitioner participated in the said enquiry, as
can be seen from the Ex.M4 and M5 the enquiry report and
enquiry proceedings respectively. As can be seen from
Ex.M5 even during the enquiry, Petitioner admitted the
factum of his being absent from duty on the dates
mentioned in the charge sheet and gave an explanation
that owning to the sickness of himself and his child and
also due to the demise of his child, he could not attend
duties regularly at that time. When he made the statement
before the enquiry officer he was not subjected to any
cross examination with this regard, which means that truth
of these contentions is not being disputed with.
9. Thus, it is very much clear that owing to the sickness
of himself as well as his daughter and also demise of his
daughter who was so sick, Petitioner could not attend to
the duties regularly on the dates mentioned in Ex.MI charge
sheet. He reasonably explained in Ex.M2 that as he was
attending to his ailing child who was under going treatment
in Area Hospital, Bellampally and to attend to his duties
from Bellampally he was to cover considerable distance
and due to that reason also he could not attend to the
duties at the relevant time. Inspite of all these reasons
which were explained by the Petitioner and which were not
being disputed with, the enquiry officer has given a finding
in Ex. M4 report that Petitioner has been guilty of
misconduct of habitual absence without sufficient reason.
As can be seen from the contents of Ex.M4 the enquiry
officer was conscious of the fact that during the relevant
time Petitioner's daughter was seriously ailing and she
expired after prolonged treatment. Inspite of it, and
stressing on the fact that Petitioner pleaded guilty of his
being absent from duties, the learned enquiry officer gave
the finding that the guilt of the Petitioner for the charge
levelled against him is proved. But the fact remains that
there is sufficient and reasonable cause for the Petitioner
not being able to attend to the duties at the relevant time. It
can not be said that without there being any sufficient
cause Petitioner absented himself from duty.
10. Inspite of it, the Disciplinary Authority evidently
accepted the findings of the enquiry officer in total and
proceeded further in the matter. Ex.M8 is the final order
passed by the Disciplinary Authority. As can be seen from
this document, a copy of said enquiry report was supplied
to the Petitioner calling for his representation if any,
regarding the findings contained in the enquiry report and
in answer to the same Petitioner made representation dated
3.10.1998. The said representation is not filed before this
court. As per Ex.M8, 'Disciplinary Authority found the
contents of the said representation are not satisfactory
but he did not give any reasons for his arriving at the such
decision. He did not discuss the contents of the said
representation in Ex.M8 order. He awarded the punishment
of dismissal from service with immediate effect to the
Petitioner, by virtue of Ex.M8 order.
11. There are several other punishments provided
for, for the misconduct committed by the workmen of
the respondent company in Standing Orders Clause No.
26 of the respondent company. Dismissal from service is
the gravest punishment provided for. Therefore such
punishment can be awarded only in extreme cases where
gravest misconduct is alleged and proved. In the present
case, Petitioner, for sufficient reason and under the
extreme circumstances discussed above, could not attend
to the duties regularly at the relevant time, which resulted
into his being absent from duties on various dates
mentioned in Ex.M1 charge sheet. The record does not
disclose that Petitioner was habitual absentee from duties
and disciplinary action was taken against his for any such
previous misconduct. That means this is the first and only
disciplinary action taken against the Petitioner and as a
result of this disciplinary action itself Petitioner has been
removed from service. Why the various circumstances
explained by the Petitioner, as reasons for his inability to
attend the duties at the relevant time, were not acceptable
as sufficient cause for his absence from duties, either to
the enquiry officer or to the Disciplinary Authority, is
not explained any where on record. Both these officials
ignored the said explanation totally. Whereas, the
explanation given by the Petitioner is a sufficient cause
for any body to be absent from duties. Sickness of self
and serious sickness of his child which required his
attendance and which ultimately resulted into her demise
are certainly sufficient causes for a workman being absent
from duties.
12. Learned Counsel for the respondents relied upon
the principles laid down in the cases of State of UP and
others Vs. Ashok Kumar Singh and another reported in
1996(1) SCC 302 and North Eastern Karnataka Road
Transport Corporation,. Vs. Ashappa. In support of his
contention that absence from duty for a long time is
misconduct of such nature which does not deserve
leniency and which warrants the punishment of dismissal
from service. As can be seen from both these cases, the
workmen thereto have shown negligence and
disinterestedness towards duties by being absent from
duties long time without there being sufficient cause.
Whereas in the present case Petitioner could give
reasonable and sufficient causes for his absenteeism, as
already discussed above. Therefore, the principles laid
down in the above said legal precedents can not be made
applicable to the facts of the present case.
13. Learned Counsel for the respondent further
contended that Petitioner failed to produce death
certificate pertaining to his child and also failed to
produce any medical record to substantiate his
contentions. But the fact remains as already discussed
above, that when he made a statement during the enquiry
to the effect that owing to the sickness and consequential
4114
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
demise of his child and also his own sickness, he could not
attend to the duties, he was not at all been subjected to
any cross examination, which amounts to the
Management's acceptance to the truth of his contentions.
14. In view of the fore gone discussion of the
material on record, it can safely be held that Petitioner is
not guilty of the charge under Standing Orders 25.25, thus,
the order of dismissal from service passed against him
by virtue of Ex.M8 order is liable to be set aside.
This point is answered accordingly.
15. Point No. (II) :
In view of the finding given in point No.(I) above,
Petitioner is entitled for the relief of setting aside the
impugned order, i.e., Ex.M8 order and he is entitled for
reinstatement into service.
16. But the fact remains that Petitioner has not
applied for any leave and has not intimated the concerned
authorities about his inability to attend the duties before
absenting himself from duties. It certainly would have
caused inconvenience and hardship to the respondent
company. For the period of his absence he would not have
been paid any wages. That itself is not sufficient to remedy
the inconvenience suffered by the respondent.
17. Considering the circumstances, though
Petitioner will have to be ordered to be reinstated into
service, as far as back wages are concerned, he will be
entitled for 25% of the wages to which he would have
been entitled to, if he has been continued in service only.
He is entitled for continuity of service and all other
attendant benefits. This point is answered accordingly.
Result :
18. Point No. 3: In the result petition is allowed.
The impugned order passed by the first respondent
No.SRP(P)/P(IR)/35. A/2K/938 dated 30-5-2000
dismissing the Petitioner from service is declared as
illegal and arbitrary and is hereby set aside. Petitioner
shall be reinstated in service forth with. He shall be
entitled for 25% of the back wages for the period from
the date of his dismissal from service till the date of
publication of this order in official gazette. There after
he is entitled for full wages. Respondent shall pay the
wages accordingly. Petitioner is entitled for continuity
of service and all other attendant benefits.
Award passed accordingly. Transmit.
Dictated to Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant
transcribed by her corrected by me on this the 29th day
of May, 2013.
M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer
Appendix of evidence
Witnesses examined
Witnesses examined
for the Petitioner
for the Respondent
NIL
NIL
Documents marked for the Petitioner
Ex. Wl: Dismissal order dated 30-5-2000
Documents marked for the Respondent
Ex. M1: Charge sheet dated 30-3-1998
Ex. M2: Petitioner's explanation dated 4-4-1998
Ex. M3: Enquiry Notice to Petitioner dt.20-8-1998
Ex. M4: Enquiry report dt.19-9-98
Ex. M5: Enquiry proceeding dt. 29-8-98
Ex. M6: Notice dt. 25-9-98
Ex. M7: Representation of Petitioner 27-8-99
Ex. M8: Final Settlement notice dt.30-5-2000
ubZ fnYyh] 2 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1548-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ ,l- lh-
lh- ,y- ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds
chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV (la[;k 18@2012)
dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 02&07&2013 dks
izkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹iQk- la- ,y& 22013@1@2013&vkbZ vkj(lh&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 2nd July, 2013
S.O. 1548.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central
Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,
Hyderabad (18/2012) as shown in the Annexure, in the
industrial dispute between the employers in relation to
the management of SCCL and their workmen, which was
received by the Central Government on 02-07-2013
[ F. No. L-22013/1/2013-IR(C-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR
COURT AT HYDERABAD
PRESENT : Smt. M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer
Dated the 17th day of May, 2013
Industrial Dispute L. C. No. 18/2012
Between :
Sri Md. Gouse Moinuddin,
S/o M.A. Jabbar,
C/o Smt. A. Sarojana,
Advocate, Flat No.G-7, Ground floor,
Rajeshwari Gayatri Sadan,
Opp. Badruka Junior College for Girls,
Kachiguda,
Hyderabad
..............Petitioner
AND
1.
The General Manager,
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
Srirampur, Adilabad District.
2.
The Superintendent of Mines,
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
SSRP 3 & 3A incline, Srirampur,
Adilabad district
. . . .Respondents
APPEARANCES:
For the Petitioner:
M/s. A. Sarojana & K. Vasudeva
Reddy, Advocates
For the Respondent:
None
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4115
A WARD
This is a petition filed under Sec.2 A (2) of the I D.
Act, 1947 between the management of M/s. Singareni
Collieries Company Ltd., and their workman Sri Md. Gouse
Moinuddin and numbered in this Court as L.C.No. 18/2012
and notices were issued to the parties.
2. Petitioner has filed this petition against his
dismissal from service by the Respondent vide order
No.SRP/PER/13.008/893 dated 5-3-2010, without following
the procedure and seeking for reinstatement with all
consequential benefits.
3. Case stands posted for filing of counter and
documents by Respondents.
4. At this stage, Petitioner has filed IA 58/2013 for
advancement of main case from 18-5-2013 to 7-5-2013 and
filed a memo seeking for permission to withdraw his case.
6. In pursuance of the order in IA No.58/2013 dated
7-5-2013, this case is advanced to 7-5-2013. In the memo
filed by the Petitioner seeking for permission to withdraw
the petition, Petitioner pleaded that the management was
kind enough to offer employment to him subject to
withdrawal of the present dispute and that he be permitted
to withdraw the present dispute.
7. Notice given to Respondent. Heard both parties.
Petitioner is permitted to withdraw his case.
8. In the result, the case is dismissed as withdrawn.
Award is passed accordingly Transmit.
Dictated to Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant
transcribed by her and corrected by me on this the 7th day
of May, 2013.
M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer
Appendix of evidence
Witnesses examined
Witnesses examined
for the Petitioner
for the Respondent
NIL
NIL
Documents marked for the Petitioner
NIL
Documents marked for the Respondent
NIL
ubZ fnYyh] 2 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1549-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ ,l- lh-
lh- ,y- ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds
chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 41@2010)
dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 02&07&2013 dks
izkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹iQk- la- ,y& 22013@1@2013&vkbZ vkj(lh&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 2nd July, 2013
S.O. 1549.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central
Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,
Hyderabad (41/2010) as shown in the Annexure in the
industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the
management of SCCL and their workmen, which was
received by the Central Government on 02-07-2013.
[ F. No. L-22013/1/2013-IR(C-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR
COURT AT HYDERABAD
PRESENT : Smt. M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer
Dated the 7th day of May, 2013
Industrial Dispute L. C. No. 41/2010
Between :
Sri Anney Blessington,
S/o Sampath Kumar
C/o Smt. A. Sarojana,
Advocate, Flat No.G7, Rajeshwari Gayatri Sadan,
Opp. Badruka Jr. College for Girls,
Kachiguda, Hyderabad.
. . ..Petitioner
AND
1.
The General Manager,
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
Ramagundam Area-I, Ramagundam.
Karimnagar District.
2.
The Colliery Manager/Superintendent of
Mines,
M/s Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
GDK-2 & 2A incline,
Karimnagar District.
.. . .Respondents
APPEARANCES:
F or the Petitioner:
M/s. A. Sarojana
& K. Vasudeva Reddy,
Advocates
For the Respondent:
M/s. P.A.V.V.S. Sarma &
Vijayalaxmi Panguluri,
Advocates
A W ARD
This is a petition filed by the Petitioner Sri Anne
Blessington under Sec.2 A (2) of the I.D. Act, 1947 against
the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
and numbered in this Court as L.C.I.D.No. 41/2010 and
notices were issued to the parties.
2. Petitioner has filed this petition against his
dismissal from service vide order No.RG.I/PER/S/46/6944
dated 24-l1-2008 by the Respondent, without allowing
the procedure, seeking for reinstatement with all
consequential benefits. Respondent have filed counter
statement as well as documents in support of their
contentions.
3. Case stood posted for arguments on the validity
of domestic enquiry. At this stage, the matter has been
referred to Lok Adalath for amicable settlement.
4116
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
4. While things stood so, Petitioner has filed memo
seeking for permission to withdraw his case pleading that
the management was kind enough to offer employment to
him subject to withdrawal of the present dispute and that
he be permitted to withdraw his case. In the given
circumstances, the matter has been called to the regular
file from Lok Adalath.
5. Notice given to Respondents. Heard both parties.
Petitioner is permitted to withdraw his case.
6. In the result, the case is dismissed as withdrawn.
Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.
Dictated to Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant
transcribed by her and corrected by me on this the 7th day
of May, 2013.
M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer
Appendix of evidence
Witnesses
Witnesses examined
for the Petitioner
for the Respondent
NIL
NIL
Documents marked for the Petitioner
NIL
Documents marked for the Respondent
NIL
ubZ fnYyh] 2 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1550-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ ,l- lh-
lh- ,y- ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds
chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 39@2009)
dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 02&07&2013 dks
izkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹iQk- la- ,y& 22013@1@2013&vkbZ vkj(lh&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 2nd July, 2013
S.O. 1550.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central
Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,
Hyderabad (39/2009) as shown in the Annexure, in the
industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the
management of SCCL and their workmen which was
received by the Central Government on 02-07-2013
[ F. No. L-22013/1/2013-IR(C-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR
COURT AT HYDERABAD
PRESENT : Smt. M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer
Dated the 15th day of April, 2013
Industrial Dispute L. C. No. 39/2009
Between :
Sri Neelam Srinivas S/o Neelam Venkatrajam,
C/o Smt. A. Sarojana, Advocate, Flat No.G7,
Rajeshwari Gayatri Sadan, Opp. Badruka
Jr. College for Girls,
Kachiguda, Hyderabad
..Petitioner
AND
1.
The General Manager,
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
Ramaguandam Area-IV, Ramagundam,
Karimnagar district.
2.
The Colliery Manager,
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
OCP-II, Godavarikhani,
Karimnagar district
. .. ..Respondents
APPEARANCES:
For the Petitioner:
M/s. A. Sarojana, K. Vasudeva
Reddy & P. Basavaiah,
Advocates
For the Respondent:
Sri M. V. Hanumantha Rao,
Advocate
AWARD
This is a petition filed by the Petitioner Sri Neelam
Srinivas under Sec.2 A (2) of the I.D. Act, 1947 against the
management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
and numbered in this Court as L.C.I.D.No. 39/2009 and
notices were issued to the parties.
2. Petitioner has filed this petition against his
dismissal from service vide order No. RG4/PER/IR/049/708
dated 20/21-6-2004 by the Respondent without following
the procedure seeking for reinstatement with all
consequential benefits.
3. Case stands posted for arguments under Sec. l1(A)
of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
4. At this stage, Petitioner has filed memo seeking for
permission to withdraw his case pleading that the
management was kind enough to offer employment to him
subject to withdrawal of the present dispute and that
he -be permitted to withdraw his case.
5. Notice given to Respondents. Heard both parties.
Petitioner is permitted to withdraw his case.
6. In the result, the case is dismissed as withdrawn.
Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.
Dictated to Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant
transcribed by her and corrected by me on this the 15th
day of April, 2013.
M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer
Appendix of evidence
Witnesses examined
Witnesses examined
for the Petitioner for the Respondent
NIL
`
NIL
Documents marked for the Petitioner
NIL
Documents marked for the Respondent
NIL
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4117
ubZ fnYyh] 2 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1551-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ
,l lh lh ,y ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa
ds chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj
vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k
94@2007) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 2&7&2013
dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹iQk- la- ,y&22013@1@2013&vkbZ vkj (lh&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 2nd July, 2013
S.O. 1551.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award of the Central
Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,
Hyderabad (Reference No. 94/2007) as shown in the
Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers
in relation to the management of SCCL and their workmen,
which was received by the Central Government on
2-7-2013.
[ F. No. L- 22013/1/2013-IR (C-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT
AT HYDERABAD
Present : Smt. M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer
Dated the 26th day of April, 2013
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L. C. No. 94/2007
Between :
Sri Chuttakula Shyam Sunder,
S/o Venkata Rajam,
C/o Smt. A. Sarojana,
Advocate, Flat No. G7,
Rajeshwari Gayatri Sadan,
Opp. Badruka Jr. College for Girls,
Kachiguda, Hyderabad. ......Petitioner
AND
1. The General Manager,
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
KK-5 incline, Mandamarri Area, Mandamarri,
Adilabad District.
2. The Colliery Manager/Superintendent of Mines,
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
KK-5 incline, Mandamarri Area, Mandamarri,
Adilabad District.
.....Respondents
Appearances :
For the Petitioner :
M/s. A. Sarojana, K. Vasudeva
Reddy and P. Basavaiah,
Advocates.
For the Respodent :
Sri S.M. Subhani, Advocate.
AWARD
This is a petition filed by the Petitioner Sri Chuttakula
Shyam Kumar, under Sec. 2 A (2) of the I.D. Act, 1947
against the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries
Company Ltd., and numbered in this Court as L.C. I.D. No.
94/2007 and notices were issued to the parties.
2. Petitioner has filed this petition against his
dismissal from service vide order No. K5/2001/5/1464 dated
27/29-3-2001 by the Respondent without following the
procedure seeking for reinstatement with all consequential
benefits. Respondents have filed counter statement as
well as documents in support of their contentions. On filing
of memo conceding domestic enquiry as valid by the
Petitioner, Departmental enquiry held legal and valid.
3. Case stands posted for arguments under Sec. 11(A)
of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
4. At this stage, Petitioner has filed memo seeking
for permission to withdraw his case pleading that the
management was kind enough to offer employment to
him subject to withdrawal of the present dispute and that
he be permitted to withdraw his case.
5. Notice given to Respondents. Heard both parties.
Petitioner is permitted to withdraw his case.
6. In the result, the case is dismissed as
withdrawn. Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.
Dictated to Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant
transcribed by her and corrected by me on this the 26th
day of April, 2013.
M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer
Appendix of evidence
Witnesses examined
Witnesses examined for
for the Petitioner
the Respondent
NIL
NIL
Documents marked for the Petitioner
NIL
Documents marked for the Respondent
NIL
ubZ fnYyh] 2 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1552-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ
,l lh lh ,y ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa
ds chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj
4118
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SHRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k
84@2012) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 2&7&2013
dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹iQk- la- ,y&22013@1@2013&vkbZ vkj (lh&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 2nd July, 2013
S.O. 1552.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award of the Central
Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,
Hyderabad (Reference No. 84/2012) as shown in the
Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers
in relation to the management of SCCL and their workmen,
which was received by the Central Government on 2-7-2013.
[ F. No. L- 22013/1/2013-IR (C-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT
AT HYDERABAD
Present : Smt. M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer,
Dated the 27th day of April, 2013
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 84/2012
Between :
The President (Sri R. Kashi Ramulu),
Telengana Trade Union Council,
H. No. 3-5-247/3, Azmathpura,
Karimnagar.
......Petitioner
AND
The General Manager,
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
Mandamarri Area, Mandamarri,
Adilabad District-504231 .....Respondent
Appearances :
For the Petitioner :
M/s. A. Sarojana and K. Vasudeva
Reddy, Advocates.
For the Respondent :
NIL
AWARD
The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its
order No. L-22012/156/2012-IR (CM-II) dated 7-11-2012
referred the following dispute under section 10(1)(d) of
the I.D. Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal between
the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
and their workmen. The reference is :
SCHEDULE
‘‘Whether the action of the General Manager,
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Mandamarri
Area, Mandamarri, Adilabad District, in terminating
the service of Shri Kolipaka Anjaiah, Ex-Badli Filler,
KK-2 inc., SCCL, Mandamarri Area with effect from
27-2-2001 is justified or not? To what relief he
applicant is entitled for?”
The reference is numbered in this Tribunal as I.D.
No. 84/2012 and notices were issued to the parties.
2. Notices were issued to both parties and the same
were reported served. For Petitioner union Sri. K. Vasudeva
Reddy, Advocate and for Respondent Sri P.A.V.V.S. Sarma
have offered to file vakalat by th next date of hearing.
3. The case stands posted for appearance of parties
to 5-8-2013. While things stood so, Sri K. Vasudeva Reddy,
Advocate filed Vakalat for the Petitioner together with
petition i. e. IA No. 74/2013 invoking Sec. 36(4) of Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 seeking permission to appear for the
Petitioner. Further he filed I.A. No. 84/2013, seeking for
advancement of the case to 27-5-2013 and filed a memo
seeking for permission to withdraw the case. In the given
circumstances, IA No. 74/2013 and IA No. 84/2013 are
allowed. Sri K. Vasudeva Reddy, Advocate is permitted to
represent the Petitioner.
4. In pursuance of the order in IA No. 84/2013 dated
27-5-2013, this case is advanced to 27-5-2013. In the memo
filed by the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner, seeking for
permission to withdraw the petition, Petitioner pleaded that
the management was kind enough to offer employment to
him subject to withdrawal of the present dispute and that
he is to be permitted to withdraw the petition.
5. Notice given to Respondents. Heard both parties.
Workman Sri Kolipaka Anjaiah is permitted to withdraw his
case.
6. In the result, the case is dismissed as withdrawn.
Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.
Dictated to Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant
transcribed by her and corrected by me on this the 27th
day of May, 2013.
M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer
Appendix of evidence
Witnesses examined
Witnesses examined for
for the Petitioner
the Respondent
NIL
NIL
Documents marked for the Petitioner
NIL
Documents marked for the Respondent
NIL
ubZ fnYyh] 2 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk-1553-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk
14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ ,l lh lh ,y
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4119
ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 16@2008)
dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 2&7&2013 dks çkIr
gqvk Fkk A
¹iQk- la- ,y&22013@1@2013&vkbZ vkj (lh&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 2nd July, 2013
S.O. 1553.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award of the Central
Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,
Hyderabad (Reference No. 16/2008) as shown in the
Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers
in relation to the management of SCCL and their workmen,
which was received by the Central Government on 2-7-2013.
[ F. No. L- 22013/1/2013-IR (C-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT
AT HYDERABAD
Present : SMT. M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI,
Presiding Officer,
Dated the 27th day of May, 2013
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L. C. No. 16/2008
Between :
Sri Lingam Shankaraiah,
S/o Lingaiah,
C/o Smt. A. Sarojana,
Advocate, Flat No. G7,
Opp. Badruka Jr. College for Girls,
Kachiguda, Hyderabad. ......Petitioner
AND
1. The General Manager,
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
Mandamarri area, Mandamarri,
Adilabad District.
2. The Colliery Manager, KK-5A incline,
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
Mandamarri Area, Mandamarri,
Adilabad District.
.....Respondents
Appearances :
For the Petitioner :
M/s. A. Sarojana, K. Vasudeva
Reddy and P. Basavaiah,
Advocates.
For the Respondent :
Sri S.M. Subhani, Advocate.
AWARD
This is a petition filed by the Petitioner Sri Lingam
Shankaraiah under Sec. 2 A (2) of the I.D. Act, 1947 against
the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company
Ltd., and numbered in this Court as L.C. I.D. No. 16/2008
and notices were issued to the parties.
2. Petitioner has filed this petition against his
dismissal from service vide order No. P/MM/7/2/01/2334
dated 20-5-2001 by the Respondent without following the
procedure, seeking for reinstatement with all consequential
benefits. Respondents have filed counter statement as well
as documents in support of their contentions. On filing of
memo conceding domestic enquiry as valid by the
Petitioner, Departmental enquiry held legal and valid.
3. Case stands posted for arguments under Sec. 11(A)
of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. At this stage, the matter
has been referred to Lok Adalath for amicable settlement.
4. While things stood so, Petitioner has filed memo
seeking for permission to withdraw his case pleading that
the management was kind enough to offer employment to
him subject to withdrawal of the present dispute and that
he be permitted to withdraw his case. In the given
circumstances, the matter has been called to the regualr file
from Lok Adalath.
5. Notice given to Respondents. Heard both parties.
Petitioner is permitted to withdraw his case.
6. In the result, the case is dismissed as
withdrawn.
Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.
Dictated to Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant
transcribed by her and corrected by me on this the 27th
day of May, 2013.
M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer
Appendix of evidence
Witnesses examined
Witnesses examined for
for the Petitioner
the Respondent
NIL
NIL
Documents marked for the Petitioner
NIL
Documents marked for the Respondent
NIL
ubZ fnYyh] 2 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1554-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ ,l lh
lh ,y ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds
chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 98@2009)
4120
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SHRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 2&7&2013 dks çkIr
gqvk Fkk A
¹iQk- la- ,y&22013@1@2013&vkbZ vkj (lh&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 2nd July, 2013
S.O. 1554.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award of the Central
Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,
Hyderabad (Reference No. 98/2009) as shown in the
Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers
in relation to the management of SCCL and their workmen,
which was received by the Central Government on 2-7-2013.
[ F. No. L- 22013/1/2013-IR (C-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT
AT HYDERABAD
Present : SMT. M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI,
Presiding Officer,
Dated the 7th day of May, 2013
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L. C. No. 98/2009
Between :
Sri I. Ravi Shankar,
S/o I. Rayamallu,
C/o Smt. A.Sarojana,
Advocate, Flat No. G-7, Ground Floor,
Rajeshwari Gayatri Sadan,
Opp. Badruka Junior College for Girls,
Kachiguda, Hyderabad. ......Petitioner
AND
1. The General Manager,
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
Mandamarri Area,
Mandamarri, Adilabad District.
2. The Superintendent of Mines,
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
SMG-3 Incline, Mandamarri Area,
Mandamarri, Adilabad District.
.....Respondents
Appearances :
For the Petitioner :
M/s. A. Sarojana and K. Vasudeva
Reddy, Advocates
For the Respondent :
Sri M.V. Hanumantha Rao,
Advocate.
AWARD
This is a petition filed under Sec. 2A (2) of the I.D.
Act, 1947 between the management of M/s. Singareni
Collieries Company Ltd., and their workman Sri I. Ravi
Shankar and numbered in this Court as I.C. No. 98/2009
and notices were issued to the parties.
2. Petitioner has filed this petition against his
dismissal from service by the Respondent vide order No.
P/MM/7/2/00/1681 dated 16-4-2000 without following the
procedure seeking for reinstatement with all consequential
benefits.
3. Respondent have filed counter statement.
4. Both parties have filed their respective documents
and case stands posted for arguments on validity of
domestic enquiry by Respondents.
5. At this stage, Petitioner has filed IA 56/2013 for
advancement of main case from 1-7-2013 to 7-5-2013 and
filed a memo seeking for permission to withdraw his case.
6. In pursuance of the order in IA No. 56/2013 dated
7-5-2013, this case is advanced to 7-5-2013. In the memo
filed by the Petitioner seeking for permission to withdraw
the petition, Petitioner pleaded that the management was
kind enough to offer employment to him subject to
withdrawal of the present dispute and that he be permitted
to withdraw the present dispute.
7. Notice given to Respondent. Heard both parties.
Petitioner is permitted to withdraw his case.
8. In the result, the case is dismissed as withdrawn.
Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.
Dictated to Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant
transcribed by her and corrected by me on this the 7th day
of May, 2013.
M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer
Appendix of evidence
Witnesses examined
Witnesses examined for
for the Petitioner
the Respondent
NIL
NIL
Documents marked for the Petitioner
NIL
Documents marked for the Respondent
NIL
ubZ fnYyh] 2 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1555-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ ,l lh
lh ,y ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds
chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 1@2007)
dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 2&7&2013 dks çkIr
gqvk Fkk A
¹iQk- la- ,y&22013@1@2013&vkbZ vkj (lh&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4121
New Delhi, the 2nd July, 2013
S.O. 1555.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central
Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,
Hyderabad (1/2007) as shown in the Annexure in the
Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to
the management of SCCL and their workmen, which was
received by the Central Government on 2-7-2013.
[ F. No. L- 22013/1/2013-IR (C-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT
AT HYDERABAD
Present : Smt. M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer
Dated the 4th day of April, 2013
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L. C. No. 1/2007
Between :
Sri T. Krishna Murthy,
S/o T.V. Narasiah,
C/o Smt. A.Sarojana, Advocate,
Flat No. G-7, Ground floor,
Rajeshwari Gayatri Sadan,
Opp. Badruka Jr. College for Girls,
Kachiguda, Hyderabad. ......Petitioner
AND
1. The General Manager,
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
Sreerampur Area, Sreerampur,
Adilabad District.
2. The Dy. General Manager,
RK-7, incline, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
Sreerampur Area, Sreerampur,
Adilabad District.
.....Respondents
Appearances :
For the Petitioner :
M/s. A. Sarojana, & K. Vasudeva
Reddy, Advocates.
For the Respondent :
M/s. P.A.V.V.S. Sarma & Vijaya
Laxmi Panguluri, Advocates.
AWARD
Sri T. Krishna Murthy, who woked as badli filler at
RK.-7 incline, Ramakrishnapur in the Respondent company
(who will hereinafter be referred to as workman) has filed
this petition against the Respondents seeking for declaring
the proceeding No. SRP/PER/13.008/3530 dated 19-7-2004
issued by the Respondent No. 1 as illegal, arbitrary and to
set aside the same, consequently directing the 2nd
Respondent i.e., The Dy. General Manager M/s. Singareni
Collieries Company Ltd., RK-7 incline, to reinstate the
Petitioner into service, duly granting all the consequential
benefits such as continuity of service, back wages and all
other attendent benefits etc., and such other reliefs as
this court may deems fit.
2. The averments made in the petition in brief are as
follows :
The Petitioner was appointed as badli filler on
15-5-2000 in first Respondent company on compassionate
grounds and was posted to work in the office of 2nd
Respondent. On 10-1-2003 a charge sheet was served on
him alleging that he was absent from duty without
sanctioned leave or sufficient cause, which amount to
misconduct under the company’s Standing Order No. 25.25.
The Petitioner has submitted explanation on 23-4-2004
explaining the reasons for his inability to perform duties
during the said period. Without considering the same on
merits an enquiry was conducted with a pre-determined
notion. During that enquiry Petitioner was not given any
opportunity. Basing on such lop-sided enquiry, the Enquiry
Officer held the charges as proved. Basing on such
erroneous findings, the workman was dismissed from
service, vide office order dated 19-7-2004. The workman
has categorically prayed in his reply to the charge sheet as
well as during the course of enquiry that due to ill-health
and family problems he could not attend to the duties. He
also prayed that he will attend duty without absence in
future but, his submissions were not considered. The order
dated 19-7-2004 is wholly illegal, arbitrary and violative of
principles of natural justice. The workman was not explained
as to the procedure of the enquiry. He was not offered the
assistance of any defence assistant. The Enquiry Officer
and Disciplinary Authority proceeded with pre conceived
notion as if the workman has accepted the charges alleged
against him, which is factually incorrect. Neither of them
has considered the submission of the workman before
arriving at a conclusion. The enquiry was conducted in
the language not known to the workman and it was not
explained to him in the language known to him. Having
drafted the proceedings in English, the signatures of the
workman were obtained. As per the instructions issued by
the Respondent No.1 company the proceedings of the
enquiry are to be conducted in the language known to the
delinquent employee. The Enquiry Officer relied upon the
evidence of the irrelevant witnesses who have no personal
knowledge of the charge alleged against the Petitioner.
Though enquiry officer relied upon several documents to
substantiate the charges, none of those documents either
shown or furnished to the Petitioner either before or during
the course of enquiry. Even the documents marked do not
establish the charge alleged against him. The enquiry was
conducted in a routine and mechanical manner with a
predetermined intention to somehow or the other, put the
Petitioner to extreme hardship of dismissal from service.
First Respondent has not applied his mind independently
while issuing the impugned order of dismissal. Before
4122
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SHRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
issuing the said order, approval of competent authority
was not obtained. No opportunity was given to the
workman to produce his witness. Neither the findings of
the Enquiry Officer nor the interim order contained any
reasons much less valid in nature. Further more, the
punishment awarded is excessive and disproportionate to
the charges alleged against him. The workman was
appointed in the year 2000 on compassionate grounds. He
is not highly literate and he is not aware of the procedural
aspects and as such absenteeism occurred for some days
during the year 2002. If the court comes to a conclusion
that findings of the Enquiry Officer and Respondent No.1
are correct even then the workman craves indulgence of
the court to modify the punishment to that of lesser
punishment under Sec.11A of the Industrial Disputes Act,
1947 to enable the workman survive himself and also feed
his family members.
3. The Respondents filed his counter statement with
averments in brief as follows :
As far as coal mines are concerned appropriate
Government is Central Government. The proper procedure
to entertain any industrial dispute is after the failure of
conciliation which has not been done in the instant case.
Straight away the Petitioner has approached this Tribunal
and filed petition under Sec.2 A(2) of Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947 which is a state amendment is not applicable to
the Respondent company as the appropriate Government
is Central Government to which the State Amendment is
not applicable. The workman herein is an unauthorized
habitual absentee appointed as badli filler on 15-8-2000
and was working at RK.7 incline of Srirampur Area. He was
irregular in attending to his duties. He had put in 78 musters
in the year 2000 and 72 musters in the year 2001. He put in
only 43 musters in the year 2002. Hence, he was issued
with charge sheet dated 10-1-2003 for his habitual absence
from duty without justified cause for the year 2002 which
constitutes misconduct of under company's Standing
Orders No.25.25. The workman submitted his explanation
to the said charge sheet. As it was found to be
unsatisfactory, enquiry was ordered. The workman has
attended the said enquiry and fully participated in it. The
Enquiry Officer has explained the workman regarding the
procedure of the enquiry in the language known to the
Petitioner. When he was given option to have any assistant
in the enquiry, he declined to have such assistance. Two
witnesses were examined on behalf of the management
and workman himself deposed on his behalf. The enquiry
was conducted following the principles of natural justice.
The workman was asked whether he wants to cross examine
the management witnesses he declined to do so. Petitioner
in his deposition stated that due to ill-health he could not
attend to his duty regularly in the year 2002 and admitted
that he was absent to duty. Further, he stated that he has
taken treatment in private hospital for ill-health but he has
not produced any documentary proof. After conclusion of
the enquiry a report was submitted. Notice was issued to
the workman on 19-12-2003 along with copy of enquiry
report calling for his comments on the findings of the
Enquiry Officer. He has submitted his representation,
considering the same and also the enquiry report, the
Disciplinary Authority opined that it is not a case to take
lenient view and decided to terminate the services of the
workman. Accordingly, he was dismissed from service by
virtue of the proceeding dated 19-7-2004. The contention
of the Petitioner that before issuing the impugned order of
dismissal, without considering the merits of his submissions,
the enquiry was conducted and disciplinary action was
taken is all incorrect. His further contention that with pre-
conceived notion the enquiry was conducted in a routine
and mechanical manner is also incorrect. Petition is filed
after lapse of three years since the date of impugned order
and therefore, it is liable to be dismissed on the ground of
delay and latches.
4. A memo has been filed by the Petitioner stating
that he does not want to challenge the validity of
domestic enquiry and in the light of the said memo this
Tribunal has held that the domestic enquiry conducted by
the Respondent is valid. Since, the validity of domestic
enquiry has not been challenged by the workman, there is
no need for going into merits and demerits of the said
enquiry. Even, the evidence adduced on record need not
be re-appraised except for the limited purpose of verifying
whether the punishment awarded to the workman by the
Respondent No.1 is in proportion to the charges levelled
and established against him.
5. Heard the arguments of either party under Sec.11A
of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Written arguments filed
by either party and the same are considered.
6. Points that arise for determination are:
(1) Whether the punishment awarded to the
workman by virtue of impugned proceeding No.
SRP/PER/13.008/3530 dated 19-7-2004 is
disproportionate to the charges alleged and
established against the workman?
(2) Whether the workman is entitled for relief of
reinstatement into services and consequential
benefits?
7. Point No. (l) : As per the record, by virtue of
proceeding No.SRP/PER/13.008/3530 dated 19-7-2004, the
final order has been passed by the first Respondent,
dismissing the workman from service w.e.f. 19-7-2004. As
can be seen from this proceeding, the enquiry report
together with enquiry proceeding and also the
representation of the workman dated 23-4-2004, all have
been examined by the Disciplinary Authority and he
found the representation of the workman not satisfactory.
Further, since the charges levelled and proved against the
workman being serious, he found fit the punishment of
dismissal from service. It is further stated in this proceeding
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4123
that the Disciplinary Authority has gone through the
workman's past record and found that there are no
extenuating circumstances to take a lenient view.
8. Whereas as can be seen from the charge sheet
alleged against the workman, the allegations are that, in
total Petitioner has absented himself from duty for 156 days
in different spells during the year 2002 and it has been
gathered that the Petitioner has been habitually late to
duty or habitually absent from duty without sufficient
cause. For this, the workman has given explanation stating
that due to ill-health and family circumstances he could
not attend the duty regularly. He further stated that since
his health as well as family circumstances were set right, he
will attend the duties regularly. Having not accepted the
said explanation, the Departmental Enquiry was conducted.
During this enquiry also the workman has categorically
deposed while examining himself as defence witness, that
he absented from duty without leave or permission from
January, 2002 to September, 2002 due to ill-health.While he
was under cross examination, he was asked whether he
informed about the family planning operation of his wife to
SOM, RK-7 incline. For that, he answered that he has not
intimated. Further when he was questioned, as to, where
he took treatment for his ill-health, he said that he took
treatment in a private hospital and that he can not produce
any evidence in support of the said version.
9. From the above evidence on record and the various
explanations given by the workman, it can be seen that the
workman has admittedly absented himself from duty during
the year 2002 for substantial period and he has given
reasons for the said absence as family problems like his
wife undergoing family planning operation and his ill-health.
But the fact remains that he has not obtained any leave or
permission from his superiors before availing the leave.
But he categorically pleaded, time and again, that if an
opportunity has been given to him, he will attend to the
duties regularly and mend his ways.
10. This is the first enquiry conducted against
Petitioner, as can be seen from the record. If there is
mention of any other past record of absenteeism, such as
Petitioner has been habitually absent from duties previously
which lead to the cause of action to launch enquiry and
awarding any punishment previously, the action of the
Respondent dismissing the Petitioner from service, stands
justified. But, this is the very first Departmental enquiry
conducted against the workman whereas the gravest
punishment provided in the Standing Orders i.e., removal
of service is awarded to him, inspite of his repeated requests
that he will mend his ways and attend his duties regularly
if an opportunity is accorded to him.
11. Considering the above discussed circumstances,
and since, this is the first event of misconduct committed
by the Petitioner, for it, the gravest punishment provided
for, can not be taken as a proper punishment, especially
since he is pleading that he will be very regular in attending
duty in future if opportunity is accorded to him, it can
safely be concluded that the punishment awarded is
disproportionate to the charges levelled and proved against
the workman. Further more, the aggravating circumstances
if any which lead the Disciplinary Authority towards such
a gravest punishment are not mentioned in the impugned
proceeding dated 19-7-2004.
12. Considering the above discussion and material
on record, it can safely be concluded that the punishment
awarded to the Petitioner is disproportionate to the charges
levelled and proved against him and therefore it is to be
modified appropriately.
13. Point No. (II) : Consequent to the finding in point
No.(I), the Petitioner is entitled for reinstatement into
service, but as the misconduct is proved against him, proper
sentence is to be find out in the place of the removal from
service, which is found to be grossly disproportionate to
charges levelled and proved against him. Standing Order
No.26 of the Respondent company provides for eight modes
of punishment for misconduct. They are:-
(a) Warning, reprimand, censure.
(b) Fine
(c) Suspension without wages for a period not
exceeding ten days
(d) Stoppage of increment without cumulative effect
(e) Stoppage of increment with cumulative effect
(f) Reversion to a lower stage or a lower grade in a
time scale
(g) Removal/discharge from service
(h) Dismissal from service.
Stoppage of one increment without cumulative effect
provided in Standing Orders No. 26 Clause (d) is the proper
punishment for the charge alleged and proved against the
Petitioner workman, as it is the first event of misconduct
on his part. In view of the fore gone discussion and material
on record the Point No.(I) is answered accordingly.
14. In view of the fore gone discussion it can safely
be held that punishment awarded to the workman is to be
modified as follows: In the place of punishment of dismissal
from service awarded to the workman by virtue of the
proceedings No.SRP/PER/13.008/3530 dated 19-7-2004 he
is to be awarded the punishment of stoppage of one
increment without cumulative effect. Thus, he is to be
ordered to be reinstated into service with immediate effect.
But as far as back wages are concerned as he has not
worked for the Respondent, he can not be asked to be paid
the full wages. But, considering the fact that he was unable
to attend the duties due to the impugned order of the
Respondent company, but not voluntarily, he is entitled
for compensation of atleast 25% of his wages from the date
of his dismissal from service till the date of his reinstatement
4124
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SHRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
which shall be not later than one month from the date of
publication of the award. If there is any delay in
reinstatement, one month after the publication of award,
due to the inaction on the part of the Respondents, the
Petitioner will be entitled to be paid the full wages by the
Respondent. The Respondents are liable to pay full wages
to the Petitioner workman for the period of said delay also.
This point is answered accordingly.
Result :
15. In the result, the petition is allowed. The impugned
proceeding No.SRP/PER/13.008/3530 dated 19-7-2004, as
far as award of punishment is concerned, is hereby modified
from dismissal of service to stoppage of one increment
without cumulative effect. The Petitioner shall be reinstated
into service within one month after the date of publication
of this award. He is entitled for back wages @25% of his
regular wages, for the period from the date of his dismissal
from service till the date of his reinstatement. If he is not
reinstated into service, within the stipulated time of one
month after the publication of the award, he is entitled for
full wages from the date of'expiry of one month from the
date of publication of award.
Award passed accordingly. Transmit.
Dictated to Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant
transcribed by her corrected by me on this the 4th day of
April, 2013.
M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer
Appendix of evidence
Witnesses examined for the Petitioner NIL
Witnesses examined for the Respondent NIL
Documents marked for the Petitioner
NIL
Documents marked for the Respondent
NIL
ubZ fnYyh] 2 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1556-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ ,l lh
lh ,y ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds
chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 11@2006)
dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 2&7&2013 dks çkIr
gqvk Fkk A
¹iQk- la- ,y&22013@1@2013&vkbZ vkj (lh&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 2nd July, 2013
S.O. 1556.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 11/2006)
of the Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,
Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial
Dispute between the employers in relation to the
management of SCCL and their workmen, which was
received by the Central Government on 2-7-2013.
[ F. No. L- 22013/1/2013-IR (C-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT
AT HYDERABAD
Present : Smt. M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer
Dated the 26th day of April, 2013
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L.C.No. 11/2006
Between:
Sri Janagam Shankaraiah,
S/o Ellaiah,
C/o Smt. A. Sarojana,
Advocate, Flat No.G7, Rajeshwari Gayatri Sadan,
Opp. Badruka Jr. College for Girls,
Kachiguda, Hyderabad. ... . . .Petitioner
AND
1. The General Manager,
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
RG-I Area, Godavarikhani,
Karimnagar District.
2.The Colliery Manager/Superintendent of Mines,
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
GDK-2 incline, Godavarikhani,
Karimnagar District. . . . .Respondents
Appearances :
For the Petitioner : Sri. K. Vasudeva Reddy, Advocate
For the Respondent : Sri M. Shankar Narayan, Advocate
AWARD
This is a petition filed by the Petitioner Sri Janagam
Shankaraiah, under Sec.2 A (2) of the I.D. Act, 1947 against
the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company
Ltd., and numbered in this Court as L.C.I.D.No. 11/2006
and notices were issued to the parties.
2. Petitioner has filed this petition against his
dismissal from service vide order No. P.RG.I/32A/5465 dated
6-9-2001 by the Respondent without following the
procedure, seeking for reinstatement with all consequential
benefits. Respondents have filed counter statement as well
as documents in support of their contentions. On filing of
memo conceding domestic enquiry as valid by the
Petitioner, departmental enquiry held legal and valid.
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4125
3.
Case stood posted for arguments under Sec.
l1(A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. At this stage,
the matter has been referred to Lok Adalath for amicable
settlement.
4. While things stood so, Petitioner has filed memo
seeking for permission to withdraw his case pleading that
the management was kind enough to offer employment to
him subject to withdrawal of the present dispute and that
he be permitted to withdraw his case. In the given
circumstances, the matter has been called to the regular file
from Lok Adalath.
5. Notice given to Respondents. Heard both parties.
Petitioner is permitted to withdraw his case.
6. In the result, the case is dismissed as withdrawn.
Award is passed accordingly.
Transmit.
Dictated to Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant
transcribed by her and corrected by me on this the 26th
day of April, 2013.
M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer
Appendix of evidence
Witnesses examined for the Petitioner NIL
Witnesses examined for the Respondent NIL
Documents marked for the Petitioner
NIL
Documents marked for the Respondent
NIL
ubZ fnYyh] 2 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1557-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ ,llhlh,y
ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 41@2009)
çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 02@07@2013 dks çkIr
gqvk Fkk A
¹iQk- la- ,y&22013@1@2013&vkbZ vkj (lh&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 2nd July, 2013
S.O. 1557.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award of Central Govt.
Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Hyderabad (41/2009)
as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between
the employers in relation to the management of SCCL and
their workman, which was received by the Central
Government on 02-07-2013.
[ F. No. L-22013/1/2013-IR (C-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT
AT HYDERABAD
Present :
Smt. M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer
Dated the 27th day of May, 2013
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L.C. NO. 41/2009
Between :
Sri Shamsher Ali,
S/o Shabbir Ali,
C/o Smt. A. Sarojana,
Advocate, Flat No. G 7,
Opp. Badruka Jr. College for Girls,
Kachiguda, Hyderabad.
...Petitioner
AND
1.
The General Manager,
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
Ramagundram Area, Ramagundam,
Karimnagar District.
2.
The Colliery Manager,
M/s Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
GDK-1 Incline, Godavarikhani,
Karimnagar Dist.
.....Respondents
Appearances :
For the Petitioner :
M/s. A. Sarojana & K. Vasudeva
Reddy, Advocate.
For the Respondent :
Sri S.M. Subhani, Advocate.
AWARD
1.
This is a petition filed by the Petitioner Sri
Shamsher Ali under Sec. 2 A (2) of the I.D. Act, 1947 against
the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
and numbered in this Court as L.C.I.D. No. 41/2009 and
notices were issued to the parties.
2. Petitioner has filed this petition against his
dismissal from service vide order No. RG.I/PER/S/46/08
dated 2.1.2005 by the Respondent without following the
procedure seeking for reinstatement with all consequential
benefits. Respondents have filed counter statement as well
as documents in support of their contentions.
3. Case stands posted for arguments on the point of
validity of domestic enquiry. At this stage, the matter has
been referred to Lok Adalath for amicable settlement.
4126
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SHRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
4. While things stood so, Petitioner has filed memo
seeking for permission to withdraw his case pleading that
the management was kind enough to offer employment to
him subject to withdrawal of the present dispute and that
he be permitted to withdraw his case. In the given
circumstances, the matter has been called to the regular file
from Lok Adalath.
5. Notice given to Respondents. Heard both parties.
Petitoner is permitted to withdraw his case.
6. In the result, the case is dismissed as withdrawn.
Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.
Dictated to Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant
transcribed by her and corrected by me on this the 27th
day of May, 2013.
M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer
Appendix of evidence
Witnesses examined for the
Witnesses examined
Petitioner
for the Respondent
NIL
NIL
Documents marked for the Petitioner
NIL
Documents marked for the Respondent
NIL
ubZ fnYyh] 2 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1558-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ ,llhlh,y
ds çca/ra=k ds laca¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 46@2008)
çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 02@07@2013 dks çkIr
gqvk Fkk A
¹iQk- la- ,y&22013@1@2013&vkbZ vkj (lh&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 2nd July, 2013
S.O. 1558.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award of Central Govt.
Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Hyderabad (46/2008)
as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between
the employers in relation to the management of SCCL and
their workman, which was received by the Central
Government on 02-07-2013.
[ F. No. L-22013/1/2013-IR (C-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT
AT HYDERABAD
Present :
Smt. M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer
Dated the 26th day of April, 2013
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L.C. NO. 46/2008
Between :
Sri Embadi Ramesh,
S/o Narayana,
C/o Smt. A. Sarojana,
Advocate, Flat No. G 7,
Opp. Badruka Jr. College for Girls,
Kachiguda, Hyderabad.
...Petitioner
AND
1.
The General Manager,
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
Bellampalli Division, Bellampally,
Adilabad District.
2.
The Superintendent of Mines,
M/s Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
Goleti-1 incline, Bellampally Division,
Bellampally, Adilabad Dist.
.....Respondents
Appearances :
For the Petitioner :
M/s. A. Sarojana & K. Vasudeva
Reddy, Advocates.
For the Respondent :
Sri M.V. Hanumantha Rao,
Advocate.
AWARD
1.
This is a petition filed by the Petitioner Sri Embadi
Ramesh under Sec. 2 A (2) of the I.D. Act, 1947 against the
management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
and numbered in this Court as L.C.I.D. No. 46/2008 and
notices were issued to the parties.
2. Petitioner has filed this petition against his
dismissal from service vide order No. P.BPA/129/2964 dated
14.9.2000 by the Respondent without following the
procedure seeking for reinstatement with all consequential
benefits. Respondents have filed counter statement as well
as documents in support of their contentions. On filing of
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4127
memo conceding domestic enquiry as vild by the Petitioner,
departmental enquiry held legal and valid.
3. Case stands posted for arguments under Sec. 11(A)
of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
4. At this stage, Petitioner has filed memo seeking
for permission to withdraw his case pleading that the
management was kind enough to offer employment to him
subject to withdrawal of the present dispute and that he be
permitted to withdraw his case.
5. Notice given to Respondents. Heard both parties.
Petitoner is permitted to withdraw his case.
6. In the result, the case is dismissed as withdrawn.
Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.
Dictated to Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant
transcribed by her and corrected by me on this the 26th
day of April, 2013.
M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer
Appendix of evidence
Witnesses examined for the
Witnesses examined
Petitioner
for the Respondent
NIL
NIL
Documents marked for the Petitioner
NIL
Documents marked for the Respondent
NIL
ubZ fnYyh] 3 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1559-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ Hkkjrh;
thou chek fuxe gSnjkckn ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj
muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa
dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds
iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 60@2011) çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh;
ljdkj dks 02@07@2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹iQk- la- ,y&17011@9@2010&vkbZ vkj (,e)º
tksgu rksiuks] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 3rd July, 2013
S.O. 1559.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the common Award (Ref.
No. 60/2011) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal/Labour Court, Hyderabad now as shown in the
Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers
in relation to the management of Life Insurance
Corporation of India, Hyderabad, and their workman,
which was received by the Central Government on
02-07-2013.
[ F. No. L- 17011/9/2010-IR (M)]
JOHAN TOPNO, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT
AT HYDERABAD
Present :
Smt. M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer
Dated the 29th day of May, 2013
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L.C. NO. 60/2011
Between :
Sri A.V. Sagar,
S.R. No. 670001, S1,
Sapthagiri Enclave,
Rajeshwarinagar,
Kakinada-533003.
...Petitioner
AND
1.
The Regional Manager (P & IR),
Life Insurance Corporation of India,
South Central Zonal Office,
Jeevan Bhagya, Saifabad,
Hyderabad-500063.
2.
The Managar (P & IR),
DM LIC of India, Divisional Office,
Jeevan Godavari, Morampudi.
.....Respondents
Appearances :
For the Petitioner :
M/s. L. Sripal Reddy, Advocates.
For the Respondent :
Sri K.R.L. Sarma, Advocate.
AWARD
1.
The Government of India, Ministry of Labour
by its order No. L-17011/9/2010-IR(M) dated 5.10.2011
referred the following dispute under Section 10(1)(d) of the
I.D. Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal between the
management of Life Insurance Corporation of India and
their workman. The reference is,
SCHEDULE
‘‘Whether the action of the management of Life
Insurance Corporation of India, Rajahmundry imposing the
punishment of dismissal and recovery of Rs. 9,14,896 on
4128
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SHRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Shri A. Vidya Sagar is justified? What relief the concerned
workman is entitled to?’’
The reference is numbered in this Tribunal as I.D.
No. 60/2011 and notices were issued to the parties
concerned.
2. The case stands posted for filing of claim statement
and documents. Petitioner called absent and there is no
representation since long time. Inspite of giving fair
opportunity, claim statement was not filed by the Petitioner
and the matter is coming up since the year 2011. In the
circumstances, taking that Petitioner is not interested in
the proceedings, petition is dismissed.
Award passed accordingly. Transmit.
Dictated to Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant
transcribed by her and corrected by me on this the 29th
day of May, 2013.
M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer
Appendix of evidence
Witnesses examined for the
Witnesses examined
Petitioner
for the Respondent
NIL
NIL
Documents marked for the Petitioner
NIL
Documents marked for the Respondent
NIL
ubZ fnYyh] 3 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1560-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj vflLVsUV
lqifjuVsaMsUV vkjdyksftLV] Xokfy;j ds çca/ra=k ds laca¼ fu;kstdksa
vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa
dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds
iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k lh-th-vkbZ-Vh-@,y-lh-@vkj-@274@97) dks
çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 28&6&2013 dks çkIr
gqvk Fkk A
¹iQk- la- ,y&42012@42@1997&vkbZ vkj (Mh;w)º
tksgu rksiuks] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 3rd July, 2013
S.O. 1560.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGIT/
LC/R/274/97) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal-Cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the
Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers
in relation to the management of The Asstt.
Superintendent Archaeologist, Gwalior and their workman
which was received by the Central Government on
28-6-2013.
[ F. No. L- 42012/42/1997-IR (DU)]
JOHAN TOPNO, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/274/97
PRESIDING OFFICER: SHRI R.B.P A TLE
Shri Raghavendra Singh Bhadoriya,
C/o B.S.Jadon Ki Chakki ke Pass
Mohalla Jaganpura, Laghedi Dagar,
Gwalior
........Workman
Versus
Asstt. Supdt. Archaeologist,
Archaeological Survey of India,
Archaeological Museum Gwalior Fort,
Gwalior
........Management
AWARD
Passed on this 10th day of April, 2013
1. As per letter dated 25-9-97 by the Government of
India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is
received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under
Section-10 of I.D. Act, 1947 as per Notification No. L-42012/
42/97/IR(DU). The dispute under reference relates to :
" Whether the action of the management of Asstt.
Supdt. Archaeological Survey of India in terminating
Shri Raghavendra Singh Bhadoriya w.e.f. 4-12-96 is
justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled
for ?"
2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to
the parties. 1st party submitted his statement of claim at
Page 2/1 to 2/5. The case of 1st party workman is that he
was appointed on daily wages on 25-5-94. He was assigned
duty of watchman to watch and warn section of
Archaeological Museum, Gwalior Fort, Gwalior. He was
allowed to work till 7th June 1996. No appointment order
was given to him as daily wagers were not given
appointment orders by the department. That certificate was
given to him on 8-1-96. That orally his services were
terminated on 9-1-96 in violation of Section 25-F of I.D.Act.
That one month's notice was not issued, notice pay was
not paid to him. Retrenchment compensation was not paid.
Reasons for termination were not communicated. He
submitted representation against termination but reply was
not given. Conciliation proceeding under Section 2-A of
I.D.Act initiated before ALC(C), Bhopal. The dispute has
been referred.
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4129
3. 1st party workman submits that he had completed
240 days continuous service preceding his termination.
That his termination is in violation of Section 25-H of
I.D.Act. That list of retrenched employee was not supplied
to him. Rule 77 of I. D. Act is violated. That juniors were
returned in service in violation of Section 25-G. He prays
for setting aside his termination with regularization in
service with back wages.
4. IInd party management filed Written statement at
Page 7/1 to 7/4. It is submitted by IInd party that 1st party
workman was not appointed to any post in accordance
with the rules. His appointment was on basis of need of
work as he was appointed as temporary employee on daily
wages. Certificate was obtained by 1st party. He was
designated as per seniority of casual labours. He was
disengaged for want of funds. 1st party workman had
undertaken to work again. That the dispute is not tenable
under I.D.Act. That IInd party Archaeological Museum is
not an industry under I.D.Act. That the discontinuation of
workman from 1-12-96 to 31-12-96 was justified as per rules.
Notices were served on 1st party for such break. Other
contentions of 1st party workman are denied. It is submitted
that one months advance notice was issued on 31-10-96.
The postal receipt is produced. However instead of waiting
for one month and reporting on duty on 1-01-97, the
conciliation proceedings were filed before ALC(C), Bhopal.
The material facts were suppressed by the 1st party. In
conciliation proceeding, 1st party insisted for permanent
post. Consequently the dispute has been referred. It is
emphasized that Archaeological Survey of India is not an
industry. That 1st party is not entitled to the reliefs prayed
by him.
5. 1st party filed rejoinder at Page 8/1 to 8/2. It is
contended that the objections raised in the Written
Statement by Ilnd party that 1st party was appointed as
temporary employee as per need of work is denied. He
submits that his termination from service is illegal for
violation of Section 25-F of I.D. Act.The settlement was
made during conciliation proceeding and 1st party was
reinstated on 22-7-96. However the terms of settlement were
not complied by management. His services were terminated
as per order dated 31-10-96. it is further submitted that Ilnd
party sale tickets to visitors for entry in museums charging
Rs.5 per ticket. That Ilnd party is an industry. The claim of
1st party be allowed for reinstatement with back wages.
6. The controversy between parties is whether the
Ilnd party is an Industry has been decided by the Hon'ble
High Court in W.P.No.2229/2000. The award was passed
after 1st party filed affidavit of evidence. He was not cross-
examined and Ilnd party has not adduced evidence. My
predecessor has passed award on 9-6-2003 holding that
Archaeological Survey of India is not and Industry and
legality of termination could not be decided. The matter
was reopened on 2-9-05 on application filed by 1st paprty
workman along with High Court order dated 24-8-05 in Writ
Petition No. 191/03. In the said Writ Petition, Hon'ble High
Court observed that in various cases, it has been held that
the Archaeological survey of India and the Museum is an
industry and the Industrial Dispute Act is applicable to the
said establishment. Appeal No. 3637/97 decided on 2-5-97
which has been followed by this court in W.P.No. 1495/04
decided on 23-2-05. The matter was remanded back to this
Tribunal for further decision. The award dated 9-6-03 was
quashed.
7. Considering pleadings on record, the points which
arise for my consideration and determination are as under.
My findings are recorded against each of them for the
reasons as below :-
(i) Whether the action of the
management of Asstt. Supdt.
In Negative
Archaeological
Survey
of India In terminating
Shri Raghavendra Singh
Bhadoriya w.e.f. 4-12-96 is
justified?
(ii) If so, to what relief the 1st party workman is
workman is entitled to?
entitled to reinstatement
with 50 % back wages.
REASONS
8. As discussed above, Hon'ble High Court has
decided controversy about industry and held that the IInd
party management Archaeological Survey of India is an
Industry. Therefore it is necessary to decide whether the
termination of services of 1st party is legal. After remand,
1st party workman has filed affidavit of his evidence on
23-5-06 at Page 27/1 to 27/3. He has stated on oath that he
was engaged on daily wages from 25-5-94. He was
discontinued from 8-1-96. In conciliation proceeding,
settlement was arrived between parties. He was reinstated
from 26-7-96. He was apprehending his discontinuation by
IInd party. Therefore he had written letter to ALC(C), Bhopal
dated 30-7-96. That IInd party had given letter dated
31-10-96 that his services would be discontinued from
1-12-96 to 31-12-96. However his services were orally
terminated from 4-12-96. That he was not paid retrenchment
compensation. He had completed 240 days service. His earlier
affidavit filed at Page 11/1 to 11/3 covers his entire contention
in his statement of claim that his services were terminated
and one Mr. Ravi had been appointed as class-IV employee
on daily wages. That termination of service is in violation of
Rule 77 of Industrial Rules. Despite of repeated opportunities
4130
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SHRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
given to the IInd party, 1st party workman was not cross-
examined and order sheet dated 2-6-03 shows that though
1st party workman was present for cross-examination, Shri
D.N. Jha, Asstt. Supdt. was present for IInd party. He
refused to cross-examine. He also declined to adduce any
evidence in support of the contention of the management.
Thus the evidence of 1st party remained unchallenged.
IInd party not filed affidavit of evidence after remand of
the matter. Despite repeated notices sent to IInd party from
2006, management failed to appear and cross-examine the
witness and right to cross-examination by management
was closed on 10-1-08. IInd party did not file any evidence
after remand of the matter. It is surprised to say that the
IInd party has not participated in the proceeding for reasons
not known. The certificate produced by 1st party at page
3/3 shows that workman was continuously working from
May 94 to 7-1-96 and thereafter as per settlement dated
22-7-96 till his oral termination on 4-12-96. The services of
1st party are terminated without paying retrenchment
compensation. without displaying list of employees
retrenched. As such IInd party management has committed
violation of Section 25-H & G of I.D.Act.
9. Learned counsel for 1st party Mr. Upendra Singh
in support of their claim relies on ratio held in case of Shri
Anoop Sharma Versus Executive Engineer, Public Health
Division No.1, Panipat (Haryana) reported in 2010(5)
Supreme Court Cases 497. Their Lordship held:-
‘‘Non-compliance of clause (a), (b) of Sec-25-F renders
retrenchment nullity-burden lies on employer to lead
tangible evidence as to compliance with clauses (a) and (b)
of Section 25-F. Services of appellant workman terminated
allegedly by offering compensation in lieu of notice period.
Compliance with Section 25-F pleaded on ground that
workman refused to receive compensation. Finding that
compensation was sent after about three months of
termination, Labour Court set aside termination for non-
compliance with Section 25-F High Court reversing award
in writ jurisdiction on ground that workman's initial
engagement was not legal.
Their Lordship held High Court erred in interfering
with award of Labour Court in absence of pleadings that
initial engagement/appointment was illegal and when it did
not find that the award was vitiated by apparent error of
law. The employer failed to prove compliance with clause
(a) and (b) of Section 25-Fdirecting reinstatement with back
wages.’’
In para-25 of the judgment their Lordship observed
that the judgment of the constitution bench in State of
Karnataka Versus Umadevi and other decisions in which
this Court considered the right of casual, daily wage,
temporary and adhoc employees to be regularized/
continued in service or paid salary in the regular timescale,
appears to have unduly influenced the High Court's
approach in dealing with the appellant's challenge to the
award of the Labour court. In our view, none of those
judgments has any bearing on the interpretation of Section
25-F of the Act and employer's obligation to comply with
the conditions enumerated in that section.’’
10. Shri Bhupendra singh arguing for 1st party relies
on ratio held in case of Harjinder Singh versus Punjab
State Warehousing Corporation in 2010(3) Supreme Court
Cases 192. Their Lordship dealing with Section 25-G of
I.D.Act held that-
"Principle of 1st come last go needs to prove
continuous service. Reiterated workman not required to
prove he had worked for 240 days during twelve calendar
months preceding termination, sufficient to plead and
prove that while effecting retrenchment employer violated
rule of "last come first go" without any tangible reason."
"Their Lordship restored award passed by labour
Court for reinstatement with 50 % back wages. Their
Lordship observed that there was no justification in
entertaining new pleading raised by the corporation of for
the first time before it regarding illegality of initial
appointment."
The ratio in both the cases squarely applied to
present case at hand. The services of workman were
terminated in violation of Section 25-F, no retrenchment
compensation was paid, one month notice was not issued,
list of retrenched employees was not displayed. The Junior
employee was retained in service. For above reasons, I
record my finding in Point No.1 is Negative.
11. Point No.2 arises to what relief the workman is
entitled. As per my finding in Point No.1, termination of
services of workman is in violation of Section 25-G & H of
the Act. The evidence of workman shows that he is
unemployed. His evidence is not clear how he is maintaining
his family without earning. Considering the facts of the
case that 1st party workman was terminated from service in
the year 1996, in my considered view, reinstatement of
workman with 50 % back wages would be appropriate as
held in 2010(3) Supreme Court Cases 192. Accordingly I
record my finding in Point No. 2.
12. In the result, award is passed as under:-
"(1) Action of the management of Asstt. Supdt.
Archaeological Survey of India in terminating Shri
Raghavendra Singh Bhadoriya w.e.f. 4-12-96 is illegal.
(2) IInd party is directed to reinstate 1st party
workman Shri Raghvendra Singh Bhadoria with
50 % back wages."
R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4131
ubZ fnYyh] 3 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk-1561-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj tujy eSustj]
vkfMusUl iQSDVjh ds çca/ra=k ds laca¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa
ds chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj
vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k
lhthvkbZVh@,ylh@vkj@116@96) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh;
ljdkj dks 28&6&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹iQk- la- ,y&14011@03@1995&vkbZ vkj (Mh;w)º
tksgu rksiuks] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 3rd July, 2013
S.O.1561.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Diputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGIT/
LC/R/116/96) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the
Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers
in relation to the management of The General Manager,
Ordnance Factory and Their workman which was received
by the Central Government on 28-6-2013
[ F. No. L- 14011/03/1995-IR(DU)]
JOHAN TOPNO, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM -LABOUR COURT,
JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/116/96
SHRI R. B. P ATLE, Presiding Officer.
General Secretary,
Labour Union,
Ordnance Factory Khamaria,
Khamaria, Jabalpur
.....Workman/Union
Versus
General Manager,
Ordnance Factory,
Khamaria,
Jabalpur
.....Management
AWARD
Passed on this 3rd day of May, 2013
1. As per letter dated 24-4-96 by the Government of
India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is
received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under
Section -10 of ID Act, 1947 as per Notification No.L-14011/
3/95 IR(DU). The dispute under reference relates to:
“ Whether the reduction of pay scale of Ist party
workman Vikramaditya from Rs.1380 to Rs.1200 by
management of Ordnance Factory, Khamaria,
Jabalpur is legal? If not to what relief the workman is
entitled?”
2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to
the parties. Ist party workman submitted his statement of
claim at Page 11 to 17. The case of Ist party workman is
that charge sheet was issued to him under Rule 14 of CCS
Rules on the allegation for (i) threatening to ghao the
residence of Chairman/Secretary of NGO Association, (ii)
intimidation to employees (iii) participating on unauthorized
relay hunger strike (iv) Unauthorised use of loud speaker
etc. It is further contended that the workman denied the
charges against him under his reply dated 4-11-91. After
his reply, management revoked his suspension. He was
permitted to resume duties. In reply, the workman explained
the facts and circumstances of the alleged incident. He
had admitted that he being the activist of the Ordnance
Factory Labour Union, had made announcement in the
pandal requesting all the employees to participate in the
ongoing agitation called by the Union. The meeting held
demanding legitimate demands of the employees. He had
submitted that no disciplinary action was warranted as he
has only exercised his legitimate rights guaranteed under
the Constitution of India. The allegations against him were
not proved. There was no evidence before management to
hold charges proved against him. The punishment of
withholding pay scale is excessive, illegal. He submits that
order of punishment deserves to be set aside. The
application filed by him was dismissed without proper
consideration that the action of the management imposing
punishment without opportunity for his defence is illegal.
That Disciplinary Authority should have asked workman
for inspection of documents and cross-examination of the
witness of the management. The order of punishment is by
way of victimization as he supports grievances of the
employees being activist of the Union. On these ground,
workman prays for setting aside the order of reduction in
pay scale.
3. IInd party management filed Written Statement at
Page 21 to 24. It is submitted that the workman
unauthorisedly installed pandal and stated making
announcement to the effect that in case the NGO Staff did
not boycott the overtime on 7-9-91 as per the call given by
the union, a procession would be takenout from the said
pandal, the place selected for a Hunger Strike. The
procession was to proceed to the residence of the Secretary/
Chairman of the NGO’s Association where they would
demonstrate and gherao the said Secretary. It is submitted
that loudspeaker was used by the workman though not
permitted in the factory premises. The workman intimated
co-employees and participated in unauthorized relay
hunger strike on 7- 9-91. That charge sheet was issued to
the Ist party workman on 2-9-91. The details of the articles
of charges are given in para-3 of the Written Statement.
That in reply filed by workman, he submitted suspension
4132
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
should be revoked and a moderate and lenient view should
be taken in the matter. He did not wish have an enquiry
and if any misconduct was committed on his behalf, it was
done as Union Leader. He prayed for leniency.
4. Disciplinary Authority considering the reply of
workman come to the opinion that workman was guilty of
alleged misconduct, lenient view was taken and punishment
of reduction of pay from Rs.1380 per month to Rs.1200 was
imposed on 31-1-92. It is further pleaded that in case enquiry
is found violated, management retains right to prove
misconduct before Tribunal. IInd party prays for rejection
of the demand of the workman under reference.
5. My learned predecessor decided preliminary issue
and held that the enquiry is vitiated as per order dated
29-9-99. Management was permitted to prove misconduct
of the workman.
6. Considering pleadings on record, the points
which arise for my consideration and determination are as
under. My findings are recorded against each of them for
the reasons as below:-
(i)
Whether the misconduct alleged
In Nagative
against workman is proved ?
(ii) Whether the reduction of pay
In Nagative
scale of 1st party workman
Vikramaditya from Rs.1380 to
Rs.1200/- by management of
Ordnance Factory, Khamaria,
Jabalpur is legal ?
(iii) If so, to what relief the
The punishment
workman is entitled to?” .
of reduction of
pay of 1st party
workman as per
order dated
31-1-92 is set-
aside.
REASONS
7. The punishment of reduction in pay scale from
Rs.1380 to Rs.1200 is challenged. The enquiry is found
vitiated by my learned predecessor as per order dated
29-9-99. Though the IInd party management was permitted
to prove misconduct by adducing evidence, IInd party
has failed to adduce any evidence to prove the alleged
misconduct.
8. The evidence on affidavit was adduced by parties
only on the preliminary issue whether enquiry is fair and
properly conducted. The parties did not adduce any
evidence after the enquiry was found vitiated. Therefore I
record my finding on Issue No.1 in Negative.
9. Point No.2- As IInd party has failed to prove
misconduct, the action of IInd party in reduction of pay as
per order dated 31-1-92 cannot be sustained. It deserves
to be quashed and setaside. Accordingly I record my finding
on Point No.2.
10. Point No.3- In view of finding on Point No.1 & 2,
the order of punishment dated 31-1-92 imposed by
management of IInd party is illegal and cannot be sustained.
The order of punishment therefore deserves to be
quashed. Ist party workman is therefore entitled to the
relief prayed by him. Accordingly I record my finding on
Point No.3.
11. In the result, award is passed as under:-
(1)The action of IInd party management in imposing
punishment of reduction of pay scale from Rs.1380 to
Rs. 1200 as per order dated 31-1-92 is Illegal.
(2)The said order of punishment is set aside and
management of IInd party is directed to pay the
difference of emoluments to Ist party as the punishment
of reduction of pay scale vide order dated 31-1-92 is
set-aside.
The difference of amount of pay be paid to the Ist
party workman in 4 weeks. In case of default, the amount
shall carry interest at the rate of 9 % per annum from the
date of award till its realization.
12.Let the copies of the award be sent to the
Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment
as per rules.
R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 3 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk-1562-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj tujy eSustj]
vkfMusUl iQSDVjh ds çca/ra=k ds laca¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa
ds chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj
vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k
lhthvkbZVh@,ylh@vkj@190@93) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh;
ljdkj dks 28&6&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹iQk- la- ,y&14012@08@1992&vkbZ vkj (Mh;w)º
tksgu rksiuks] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 3rd July, 2013
S.O.1562.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Diputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGIT/
LC/R/190/93) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal
-cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure,
in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation
to the management of The General Manager, Ordnance
Factory and their workman which was received by the
Central Government on 28-6-2013.
[ F. No. L- 14012/08/1992-IR(DU)]
JOHAN TOPNO, Under Secy.
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4133
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM -LABOUR COURT,
JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/190/93
SHRI R. B. PATLE, Presiding Offficer.
Shri Doodnath Singh,
President,
Ordnance Factory Khamaria Workers Union,
Khamaria, Jabalpur ....Workman/Union
Versus
General Manager,
Ordnance Factory, Khamaria,
Jabalpur .....Management
AWARD
Passed on this 18th day of March, 2013
1. As per letter dated 20-9-93 by the Government of
India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is
received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under
Section-10 of I.D. Act, 1947 as per Notification No. L-14012/
8/92-IR (DU). The dispute under reference relates to:
“Whether the action of the management of Ordnance
Factory, Khamaria, Jabalpur (MP) in imposing the
penalty of stoppage of annual increment for two
years on Shri Mahesh Prasad, T.No. S.O. 99/001329
vide their order dated 21-2-91 is justified? If not,
what relief he is entitled to?”
2. After notice, Ist party/workman failed to submit
statement of claim. Ist party is proceeded exparte on 16-2-
2006. IInd party submitted Written Statement at page 2/1
to 2/3. The claim of Ist party/workman is denied. It is
submitted on 9-8-90, from 22.00 hours to 07.00 hours, Ist
party workman was detailed on Durban duty but he was
absent from duty. At about 23.15 hours, about 30 to 35
persons alongwith one Ajay Charles had entered the
hospital in the factory and committed acts of violence.
Notice was issued to Ist party for absence/negligence in
duty as per Rule 16( 1) of Central Civil Service Rules. That
minor penalty withholding one increment was imposed for
misconduct committed by Ist party. That the Act of IInd
party is legal.
3. IInd party submitted affidavit of witness Shri
B.B.Singh covering all the material contentions of Written
Statement filed by IInd party. It is stated that for said
misconduct of Ist party, punishment of withholding one
increment is imposed.
4. Ist party/workman has not submitted statement
of claim neither adduced any evidence. The demand under
reference of Ist party therefore cannot be accepted.
5. In the result, award is passed as under:-
“ The Act of IInd party imposing punishment of stoppage
of annual increment of Ist party is just and legal.”
6. Let the copies of the award be sent to the
Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment
as per rules.
R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 3 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk-1563-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj phiQ tujy
eSustj] Vsfydke] ukxiqj ds çca/ra=k ds laca¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj
muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa
dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ
la[;k lhthvkbZVh@,ylh@vkj@91@96) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks
dsUæh; ljdkj dks 28&6&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹iQk- la- ,y&40012@251@1994&vkbZ vkj (Mh;w)º
tksgu rksiuks] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 3rd July, 2013
S.O.1563.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Dipute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGIT/
LC/R/91/96) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-
cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in
the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to
the management of The Chief General Manager, Telecom,
Nagpur and Their workman which was received by the
Central Government on 28-6-2013.
[ F. No. L-40012/251/1994-IR(DU)]
JOHAN TOPNO, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM -LABOUR COURT,
JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/91/96
SHRI R. B. PATLE, Presiding Offficer.
Shri Gulchand Sahu,
S/o Munnalal Sahu,
Near Bagudhana Gopal Factory,
Betul Gunj, Betul (MP) ....Workman
Versus
The Chief General Manager,
Telecom (RE) Project,
66, Bajajnagar, Nagpur ...Management
AWARD
Passed on this 21st day of March 2013
1. As per letter dated 27-3-96 by the Government of
India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is
received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under
4134
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Section-10 of I.D. Act, 1947 as per Notification No.
L-40012/251/94-IR (DU). The dispute under reference
relates to:
“Whether the action of the Chief General Manager,
Telecom (RE) Project, 66, Bajajnagar, Nagpur (MS)
in stopping Shri Gulchand S/o Munnalal Sahu, is
legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman
is entitled to?”
2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to
the parties, Ist party/workman submitted his statement of
claim at Page 7/1 to 7/3. It is case of Ist party workman that
he was employed by IInd party as casual labour from
June 1987. He was continuously working till July1989
abruptly he was discontinued without following process
of law. He further submits that he had completed 240 days
working in 12 calendar months preceding his retrenchment.
That he had requested management to regularize his
services and treat him as a permanent of the establishment
but instead of considering his request, the management
dispensed his services. He further submitted that in
Conciliation proceeding before ALC, IInd party had
admitted his working on its establishment. That Statement
of claim filed by Ist party workman was misplaced and he
filed fresh statement of claim. His contents that his services
are discontinued in violation of Section 25-G, H of ID Act.
He prayed for his reinstatement with all consequential
benefits.
3. IInd party management filed Written Statement at
page 8/1 to 8/3 of record. IInd party contents that applicant
was not appointed as per rule. He was engaged only as a
casual labour according to the need of the department.
That Ist party left work at his own without intimation to
the management. In June 89, Ist party workman worked for
18 days, thereafter he left the work. The breakup of working
days of Ist party is given in Para-2 of the Written Statement.
During July 87 to June 88, he had worked for 335 days,
from July 88, he had worked for 335 days, from July 88 to
Nov-88, to May 89, he was absent from work. It is submitted
that the Ist party workman has not completed 240 days
continuously during 12 calendar months from the date of
termination. The Railway Electrification was not a running
unit. Ist party himself left work. He is not terminated in
violation of provisions of ID Act. IInd party prayed for
rejection of his claim.
4. Considering pleadings on record, the points which
arise for my consideration and determination are as under.
My findings are recorded against each of them for the
reasons as below:-
(i)
Whether the action of the Chief
General Manager, Telecom (RE)
In Affirmative
Project, 66, Bajajnagar, Nagpur
(MS) in stopping Shri Gulchand
S/o Munnalal Sahu, is legal and
justified?
(ii)
If not, what relief the workman is
Workman is not
entitled to?”
entitled to any
relief prayed by
him.
REASONS
5. Ist party/workman is challenging his
discontinuation from service contending that he had
completed 240 days continuous service preceding his
retrenchment. That he was retrenched in violation of
Section 25-F , G and H of I.D.Act. IInd party denied those
contentions of the workman. The affidavit of evidence of
workman is filed stating the facts that he had completed
240 days service preceding his retrenchment. That he was
engaged by IInd party from May to June 1987 as casual
labour. He was continuously working till July 1989. His
attendance was entered in the muster roll. In his cross-
examination, Ist party says he received contention upto
Vth standard. He was working on daily wages, no written
exam was held prior to his engagement. He had not received
call from Employment Exchange. He had not received
appointment letter. He was doing work of laying cable in
the scheme. He had not read over the contents of affidavit
but signed on it.
6. In his further cross-examination, workman says
that from December 88 to May 89, he was discontinued
from work but he himself have not left the work. He was
working regularly. He denied sugestion that he had not
completed 240 days during any calendar year. That he
produced record about his working days.
7. That Ist party had produced copy of reply filed in
conciliation proceeding Exhibit W -1. The said document
also shows that in June 87 Ist party worked for 30 days,
from July 87 to June 88, he had worked for 335 days, from
July 88 to Nov-88, he worked for 127 days, from December
88 to May 89, he was not working, he had left the work.
Document Exhibit W-2 shows his working days as July 88
to November 88 - 17 days and thereafter June - 1989- 18
days. It also corroborate the contention of the IInd party
management.
8. The affidavit of evidence of management’s witness
Shri D.S. Thakur is filed covering the contentions taken in
Written Statement filed by IInd party that the workman
had left work without intimation from December 88 to May
1989. In June 1989 he worked for 18 days in July 88 to June
1989 he worked for 145 days. In his cross-examination,
management witness says that he has stated about
working days of the workman from the record available
with him. The suggestion of Ist party that workman was
denied that workman working 240 days. Evidence adduced
by Ist party is not satisfactory to establish that he had
worked for 240 days during 12 calendar months prior to
his retrenchment. Therefore Ist party is not covered as
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4135
workman under Section 25 (b) of LD.Act. Consequently
he is not entitled to protection under Section 25-F of
ID.Act. There is no violation of Section 25-G of the ID.Act.
9. Counsel for IInd party Mr. Khare relies on -
Ratio held in Secretary, State of Karnataka and others
Versus Umadevi and others in 2006(4) supreme Court Cases 1.
Their Lordship of the Apex Court held that Supreme Court
and High Courts should not issue such directions unless
the recruitment itself was made regularly and in terms of
the constitutional scheme.
That casual labor donot have any right to regular or
permanent public employment. Further temporary,
contractual, casual, adhoc or daily wage public
employment must be deemed to be accepted by the
employee concerned fully knowing the nature of it and
the consequences flowing from it.
Next reliance is placed on-
“ Ratio held in M.P.State Agro Industries
Development Corporation Ltd and Another Versus
S.C.Pandey in 2006(2) Supreme Court Cases 716.
Their Lordship dealing with casual labour, daily
wager held that a daily wager doesnot hold a post
as he is not appointed in terms of the provisions of
the Act and Rules framed thereunder and therefore
he doesnot derive any legal right.”
Reliance is also placed on ratio held in 2007(III)
MPWN 49. It is held by their Lordship that on completion
of work for more than 240 days, it doesnot confer the right
to regularization - it imposes certain obligation on employer
at the time of termination of services.
Same view was taken by their Lordship in case of
Batala Coop. sugar Mills Ltd. Versus Sowaran Singh
reported in 2005(8) Supreme Court Cases 481 .
10. Considering the evidence on record, Ist party
has failed to establish that he was working for 240 days
during 12 calendar months preceding his retrenchment.
Therefore he is not entitled to protection under Section
25-F of LD.Act. For above reasons, I record my finding in
Point No.1 in Negative.
11. In the result, award is passed as under:-
(1) Action of the management in stopping Shri Gulchand
S/o Munnalal Sahu, from work is legal and justified.
(2) 1st party/workman is not entitled to any relief as
prayed by him.”
12. Let the copies of the award be sent to the
Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment
as per rules.
R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 3 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk-1564-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj phiQ tujy
eSustj] ch-,l-,u-,y- Hkksiky ds çca/ra=k ds laca¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj
muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa
dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ
la[;k lhthvkbZVh@,ylh@vkj@47@2006) çdkf'kr djrh gS tks
dsUæh; ljdkj dks 28&6&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹iQk- la- ,y&40012@09@2006&vkbZ vkj (Mh;w)º
tksgu rksiuks] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 3rd July, 2013
S.O.1564.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Diputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT/
LC/R/47/2006) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the
Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers
in relation to the management of The Chief General
Manager, BSNL, Bhopal and their workman which was
received by the Central Government on 28-6-2013
[ F. No. L-40012/09/2006-IR(DU)]
JOHAN TOPNO, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM -LABOUR COURT,
JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/47/2006
PRESIDING OFFICER: SHRI R.B. P ATLE
Shri Chandrashekhar Sharma,
S/o Shri Babulal Sharma,
R/o Krishnapuram Colony,
Near Jhansi Tirdha,
Shivpuri
....Workman
Versus
The Chief General Manager,
Telecom, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited,
MP circle, Hoshangabad Road,
Bhopal (MP)
.....Management
AWARD
Passed on this 8th day of May, 2013
1. As per letter dated 8-8-2006 by the Government of
India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is
received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under
Section -10 of LD.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.
L-40012/9/2006- IR(DU). The dispute under reference
relates to:
4136
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
“Whether the action of the Chief General Manager,
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Bhopal in terminating
the service of Shri Chandrasekhar Sharma w.e.f.
1-6-2002 is justified? If not, to what relief the workman
is entitled for?”
2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to
the parties. Ist party workman submitted statement of
claim. The case of Ist party workman is that he was engaged
as helper by IInd party management. He was paid Rs. 2300
per month. His services were illegally terminated from
1-6-2002. That juniors were continued in service. Provisions
of Section 25-G, H of I. D. Act was not followed. That
Section 25 (N) (O) of I.D. Act were violated. That he was
not served one month’s notice, pay in lieu of notice was
not paid to him. Termination of his services is illegal. Ist
party workman prays for setting aside order of his
termination and submits for reinstatement with
consequential benefits.
3. IInd party management filed Written Statement.
All the material contentions of Ist party are denied. That
casual labours are engaged by IInd party as per exigency
of work. That the labours are engaged through contractor.
That since 1986, any body is not appointed. There is no
question of termination of service of workman as he was
not appointed by management. It is submitted that workman
is not entitled to retrenchment compensation. They have
not worked for 240 days in any of the calendar year.
Violation of Section 25-G, H is denied, IInd party prays for
rejection of claim of Ist party workman.
4. Considering pleadings on record, the points which
arise for my consideration and determination are as under.
My findings are recorded against each of them for the
reasons as below:—
(i)
Whether the action of the Chief
General Manager, Bharat Sanchar
In Affirmative
Nigam Ltd. Bhopal in terminating
the services of Shri Chandrasekhar
Sharma w.e.f. 1-6-2002 is justified?
(ii)
If so, to what relief the workman
Relief prayed
is entitled to?”
by workman
are rejected.
REASONS
5. Ist party workman has not submitted any evidence
in support of his claim. He has proceeded exparte on
2-3-12. The contentions of Ist party workman that he had
completed 240 days continuous service during each of
the year, that he was not paid retrenchment compensation,
was not paid notice pay is not substantiated by evidence.
IInd party filed affidavit of evidence of its evidence Shri
Pramod Kumar Jain. The witness of the management has
stated in affidavit that workman had not worked in the
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd., no appointment letter was
given to him. That the post is not vacant in the department.
The evidence of management’s witness remained
unchallenged as Ist party workman remained absent and
faild to cross-examine the witness. To sum up, workman
has not adduced evidence, the evidence of management
remained unchallenged. Ist party workman failed to
establish that action taken by management of IInd party
is illegal. For above reasons, I record my finding in Point
No. 1 in Affirmative.
6. Point No. 2 - In view of my finding in Point No. 1,
the workman is not entitled to relief prayed by him.
Accordingly I record my finding in Point No. 2.
7. In the result, award is passed as under:-
(1) Termination of Shri Chandrasekhar Sharma
w.e.f. 1-6-2002 is legal.
(2) Relief prayed by workman are rejected.
8. Let the copies of the award be sent to the
Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment
as per rules.
R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 3 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk-1565-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ ,iQ lh
vkbZ ds çca/ra=k ds laca¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- 2] p.Mhx<+ ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k
1576@2009) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 3&7&2013
dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹iQk- la- ,y&22011@66@2008&vkbZ vkj (lh,e&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 3rd July, 2013
S.O.1565.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Diputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 1576/
2009) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum -
Labour Court, No. 2, Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure,
in the Industrial dispute between the management of Food
Corporation of India, and Their workmen, received by the
Central Government on 3-7-2013.
[ F. No. L-22011/66/2008-IR(CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4137
ANNEXURE
IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL
TRIBUNAL- CUM -LABOUR COURT-II,
CHANDIGARH
Present: Sri A.K. Rastogi, Presiding Officer
Case No. I. D. 1576/2009
Registered on 13-2-2009
Sh. S .P. Sood, District Secetary,
Bhartiya Khadya Nigam Karamchari Sangh,
Food Corporation of India, Opposite Anaj Mandi,
Sirhind Road, Pariala,
....Petitioner
Versus
1. The Chairman-cum-Managing Director, Food
Corporation of India, 16-20, Barakhamba Lane, New Delhi.
2. The General Manager, Food Corporation of India,
Regional Office, Punjab #34 to 38, Sector 31A, Chandigarh.
3. The Executive Director (North), Food Corporation
to lndia, Plot No.2A, 2B, Sector 24, Gautam Budh Nagar,
Noida (U.P).
....Respondents
APPEARANCES
For the workman Sh. M.G. Sharma AR.
For the Management Sh. N.K. Zakhmi Advocate.
AWARD
Passed on June 14, 2013
Central Government vide Order No. L-22011/66/2008-
[IR(CM-II), dated 9-2-2009 by exercising its powers under
Section 10 Sub-section (1) Clause (d) and Sub-section
(2-A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter
referred to as ‘Act’) has referred the following Industrial
dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :—
‘‘Whether the action of the management of FCI in
imposing penalties on Sh. Shyam Lal Sharma in
charge-sheet No.21(BTI-3044)/97/795; Vig. Case No.
SGR 2547 and Vig. Case No. SGR 2662 is legal and
justified? To what relief is the workman concerned
entitled?’’
The case of the workman is that he was in the
employment of the management since 1976. The
management had punished him for the faults not committed
by him viz. :
(i) In Vigilance Case No.BTI-3044 dated 20-4-1998
he was punished by stoppage of one increment w.e.f.
1-1-1999 on the charge of misrepresentation/
misleading the department.The action was however
withdrawn by the management during the
conciliation proceedings after about 11 years. His
claim for replenishment of damages demanded by
him in the demand notice has not been satisfied.
(ii) In Vigilance Case No.SGR-2547/96 dated
10-2-1997 though the Inquiry Officer has held the
charges, of acceptance of BRL Rice having dehusk
15 per cent against permissible limit of 13 per cent
and discoloured refraction as 3.6 per cent and 3.5
per cent in stack No.C/3/8 and N/4 respectively as
against permissible limit of 3 per cent, not proved;
yet, the disciplinary authority issued a Dissent Note
and wrongly imposed the penalty of stoppage of
one increment without cumulative effect w.e.f.
1-1-2000.
(iii) In third case Vigilance Case No.SGR-2662/97
dated 5-10-1999 charges of acceptance of BRL Rice
in respect of dehusk refraction in stack/contact No.
3/O/417= 250 bags, H/2/109 = 250 bags and F/8/306
= 250 bags and broken refractions in stack No.F/8/
306 = 250 bags and E/5/305 = 250 bags framed against
the workman are not tenable. The results arrived at
RO lab have no veracity/sanctity. The margin of
allowances to cover up the human error allowed in
other cases was not given to workman.
The workman has prayed that the misjudgment as
well as disparity committed in his case be removed by
affecting a replenishment of the damages of Rs.9,50,000
suffered by the workman due to social setbacks, promotion
having been lost in between, physical harassment, mental
agony, financial losses, no benefit earned by way of
enhancement of educational qualifications during the
transitory period, loss of stagnation increments and
selection grade being TA-II since 1986 though now
promoted as TA-I w.e.f. February 2009. The promotion of
the workman from TA-II to TA-I was due in the panel of
2000 which may be granted in view of the workman being
innocent.
Claim was contested by the management and the
facts stated by the workman about the three charges
mentioned in the reference had been admitted. With regard
to Vigilance Case No.SGR 2662 it was further stated that
the disciplinary authority has imposed penalty of stoppage
of one increment without cumulative effect vide order
dated 5-10-1999. According to the management the
workman was not performing his duty with due diligence,
devotion and honesty and the conduct of the workman
reflected that he was involved in a number of vigilance
cases for which he was awarded penalty and in some of
the cases he was left with warnings.
Further, the management case regarding Vigilance
Case No.(BTI-3044)/97/795 is that the penalty of stoppage
of one increment without cumulative effect and that too
4138
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
withdrawn subsequently would not have caused loss to
the tune of Rs.9,50,000 to the workman. The workman has
failed to give the details as to how penalty of stoppage of
one increment without cumulative effect has been worked
out to such a huge amount. As per record total amount of
Rs.1,950 has been recovered from the salary of the workman
against penalty order dated 8-5-2008. Hence claim of the
workman in this regard is totally vague and is not tenable
in the eye of law. In this case he had been awarded
punishment due to mistake of identity of some other Sham
Lal TA-II and when this inadvertence came to the notice
of the management the order of punishment was withdrawn.
According to management in all the vigilance cases
except one the charges have been proved. There was no
disparity as alleged by the workman and the claim of
Rs.9,50,000 is baseless. In view of the facts of the case the
workman is not entitled to promotion as prayed. The claim
is therefore vague and deserves dismissal.
In support of his claim the workman examined himself
while on behalf of the management Sh. Mohinder Singh,
Assistant General Manager Vigilance was examined. Parties
relied on certain documents also.
I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and
also perused the evidence on record and the written
arguments filed by them.
Under reference is the action of the management in
imposing penalties on the workman in the following three
cases—
1. Charge-sheet No.21 (BTI-3044)/97/795,
2. Vigilance Case No.SGR-2547
3. Vigilance Case No.SGR-2662
Admittedly in all the three cases minor punishment
of stoppage of one increment without cumulative effect
had been given. In the first case however it was found
that the workman had been punished by inadvertence for
another employee of the same name Shyam Lal and
therefore the penalty was withdrawn. But this mistake was
deducted after about ten years during the conciliation
proceedings. Therefore admittedly in this case the penalty
imposed was not legal and justified and the same stands
withdrawn too. But the dispute is about the relief, the
workman claims to be entitled on account of the wrong
punishment in this case. It has been argued on behalf of
workman that damages worth Rs.9,50,000 were caused to
the workman by way of losing stagnation increment,
selection grade, mental agony and because of the
prolonged battle thrust upon the workman by the
management in the said case and the same may be recovered
from the salaries of the officials/officers concerned at
Regional Office, Chandigarh/Zonal Office Noida/Head
Quarter, New Delhi.
In this regard the management has argued that the
workman has failed to give any cogent reason; cause,
documents or any proof about having suffered loss of
Rs.9,50,000 while the management has proved that no loss
has been caused to the petitioner because as per record
total amount of Rs.l,950 has been recovered from the salary
of the workman against the penalty. During the cross-
examination the workman himself has categorically stated
that a stoppage of one increment resulted into a loss of
Rs. l,950 towards the salary only.
I agree with the learned counsel for the management
that there is no basis or justification for awarding damages
as claimed by workman. Moreover I am of the view that
only a relief of the ascertained amount may be awarded by
the Tribunal and the general damages on account of
‘‘social setbacks, promotion, having been lost in between,
physical harassment, mental agony, financial losses, no
benefit earned by way of enhancement of education and
qualifications during the transitory period’’ (as claimed in
para 8 of claim statement), can be awarded by the Tribunal
in an industrial dispute. The award of general damages is
in the domain of a Civil Court. I am of the view that the
workman is entitled to get back the amount of Rs.l,950
recovered from his salary, against penalty imposed in
Charge-sheet No.21(BTI-3044)/97/795.
With regard to Vigilance Case No.SGR-2547 it has
been argued on behalf of workman that though the Inquiry
Officer had not found the workman guilty yet the
disciplinary authority on the basis of his Dissent Note
which had been contested by the workman imposed the
penalty of stoppage of one increment without cumulative
effect though in this case also the workman was not guilty
since the rice samples had not been drawn in the presence
of the workman and management-witness has admitted
that superficially discoloured grains had been considered
under discoloured head instead of under slightly damaged
head. But the argument of the learned counsel for workman
in this regard is against the record. The management-
witness instead has stated that it is wrong to say that
even superficiary discoloured grain had been considered
as discoloured.
The learned counsel for the workman in this regard
has also relied on the statement of Sh. Dungar Singh,
CGAL, New Delhi Exhibit E3 given by him in some other
case. But that being a statement of a living person cannot
be considered in this case. Similarly Exhibit E 11 order of
FCI, Regional Office, Punjab, Chandigarh relating to some
other case cannot be considered in this case. It is true that
management-witness in his cross-examination was unable
to tell the ground on which the disciplinary authority had
disagreed with the Inquiry Officer but that cannot be a
ground for rejecting the Dissenting Note. It is important
to note that the said Dissenting Note was not filed by the
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4139
parties and the punishment awarded by the disciplinary
authority in this case also was a stoppage of one increment
without cumulative effect which is a minor punishment.
under Rule 11 of CCS(CCA) Rules. Rule 15(2) provides-
‘‘The disciplinary authority shall, if it disagrees with
the findings of the inquiry authority on any article
of charge, record its reasons for such disagreement
and record its own findings on such charge if the
evidence recorded is sufficient for the purpose.’’
Sub-Rule 3 of Rule 15 provides—
‘‘(iii) If the disciplinary authority having regard to
its findings on or any of the article of charges is of
the opinion that any of the penalties specified in
Clause (i) to (iv) of Rule 11 should be imposed on
the Government servant, it shall, notwithstanding
anything contained in Rule 16, make an order
imposing such penalty.’’
It is not the case of the workman that the disciplinary
authority in his Dissenting Note has not given the reasons
for dissent and has not recorded its findings on the charge.
The workman in his statement during cross-examination
has admitted to have received a show cause notice
regarding the Dissent Note, and to have replied that notice.
The learned counsel for management in this regard has
also argued that from the affidavit of management-witness
it is clear that during the year 1996 the workman had been
assigned the job to accept the rice stocks strictly
conforming to laid down specifications but he failed to do
so. In June 2006 a squad had visited Sunam Centre with a
view to adjudge the quality of rice stocks accepted by the
workman and others and had drawn representative samples
and on analysis the stocks of two samples accepted by
the workman had been found BRL. Charge-sheet SGR-
2547 had been issued in this regard for major penalty.
Inquiry Officer had exonerated the workman but the
disciplinary authority issued a memorandum containing
reasons of disagreement with the findings of Inquiry Officer
and serve upon the workman. The defence reply tendered
by the workman was found unsatisfactory and
consequently he was imposed minor penalty.
I agree with the learned counsel for management
that the punishment in this case cannot be said to be
illegal and unjustified.
It is true, as the learned counsel for workman has
argued that under Rule 15 of CCS(CCA) Rules, a period of
three months has been provided for passing orders on
inquiry report and the disciplinary authority in this case
passed the penalty order after about two years but that
cannot be a ground for holding the punishment order illegal.
Regarding third case Vigilance Case No. SGR-2662 it
has been argued by learned counsel for workman that
sampling was defective, the determination of the broken
refraction of the rice was made wrongly, analysis was
manual and to cover human error margin of allowance was
acceded by the management and the analysis was not
made properly. But the argument of workman in this regard
is not acceptable in the absence of any expert evidence.
The documents Exhibit E4, E8, E9, E13 to E15 cannot help
the workman in this regard.
It has also been argued on behalf of workman that in
SGR-2662 there were 62 consignments but only six
pertained to the workman, and other officials or officers
involved in rest of the 56 samples had been issued charge-
sheet under major penalties and one Harjas Rai Sharma
TA-II who was involved in 17 samples and had been
heavily penalized by the disciplinary authority got his
penalty modified by the Appellate/Reviewing
Authority.While the appeal of the workman was rejected
by the Appellate/Reviewing Authority. According to the
workman he was not given equal treatment.
In this regard it is important that the charge-sheet
with regard to other officials had not been filed in the case
and it is not known as to what were the charges against
them and whether their case was similar to that of workman.
I agree with the learned counsel for management that the
punishment in this case cannot be said to be illegal and
unjustified. In Vigilance Case No.SGR-2662 the workman
had been charge-sheeted under minor penalty and on
receipt of his defence reply, which was considered
unsatisfactory he was imposed again the penalty of
stoppage of one increment without cumulative effect.
Punishment cannot be said to be illegal or unjustified.
From the above going discussion it is clear that there
is nothing wrong and illegal in punishment awarded to
workman in Vigilance Case No.SGR-2547 and Vigilance
Case No.SGR-2662. The punishment awarded by
management in charge-sheet No. 21(DTI-3044) 97/795 was
admittedly wrong and has been withdrawn since then.
Amount of Rs.l,950 recovered from the workman, if not
already repaid to workman be paid to him. So far as the
relief of promotion from 2000 is concerned it is clear from
the statement of management-witness that the promotion
of workman had been withheld on account of cases
No. SGR 2527 and case No.SGR 2662. The workman is not
entitled to the relief claimed in this regard and in this way
he is not entitled to any other relief. The reference is
accordingly answered. Hard and soft copy of the award
be sent to the Central Government and copy of the award
be sent to the District Judge Patiala for information and
further necessary action.
ASHOK KUMAR RASTOGI, Presiding Officer
4140
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ubZ fnYyh] 3 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1566-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ ih- th-
vkbZ- ds çca/ra=k ds laca¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- 2] p.Mhx<+ ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k
763@2005) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 3&7&2013
dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹iQk- la- ,y&42012@211@2003&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 3rd July, 2013
S.O. 1566.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 763/
2005) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court No. 2, Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure,
in the Industrial Dispute between the management of PGI
and their workmen, received by the Central Government
on 3-7-2013.
[ F. No. L- 42012/211/2003-IR (CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL
TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT-II,
CHANDIGARH
Present : Sri A. K. Rastogi, Presiding Officer
Case No. I.D. No. 763/2005
Registered on 5-9-2005
Sh. Pawan Kumar S/o Sh. Motha Singh
House No. 1289, Phase I,
Ram Darbar, UT, Chandigarh
......Petitioner
Versus
The Director, PGI,
Sector-12, Chandigarh
.....Respondent
Appearances :
For the workman :
Sh. Arun Batra, Advocate.
For the Management :
Sh. N. K. Zakhmi, Advocate.
AWARD
Passed on 19th June, 2013
Central Government vide Notification No. L-42012/
211/2003-IR(CM-II) dated 17-8-2004 by exercising tis powers
under Section 10, Sub-section (1) Clause (d) and Sub-
section (2A) of the of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
(hereinafter referred to as ‘Act’) has referred the following
Industrial dispute for adjudication to the Tribunal :—
“Whether the action of the management of PGI,
Chandigarh in removing Sh. Pawan Kumar, Ex-
Safaiwala, from service w.e.f. 12.4.1997 is legal and
justified? If not, to what relief is the workman
entitled?”
As per claim statement the workman was working as
Safaiwala w.e.f. 11.1.1995 with the management. On
31.12.1996 he was arrested in connection of an FIR No.135
under Section 147, 149, 323, 452 and 380 of IPC. On account
of his arrest in the said case the management terminated
his services on 12.4.1997. The grievance of the workman is
that the management did not conduct any departmental
inquiry and without following the disciplinary action
procedure terminated his services in a slip shod manner
by holding a preliminary inquiry on the ground that he
remained in the police custody for more than 48 hours and
his conduct was unbecoming of an employee. He was not
given any opportunity of defence. The workman however
was subsequently acquitted on 6.9.2002 by the Court.
According to him he is entitled to reinstatement w.e.f.
12.4.1997 i.e. the date of his termination.
The claim was contested by the management and it
was stated that the workman was just a daily wager initially
appointed for a . period of 89 days. As he had been arrested
in the above mentioned criminal case and remained in
police custody from 31.12.1996 to 3.1.1997, hence a
preliminary inquiry was conducted giving full opportunity
to present/defend his case. In the inquiry he had given his
statement which was duly considered by the Inquiry Officer
and since he had remained in the police custody for the
period from 31.12.1996 to 3.1.1997 hence, his services were
terminated. Management has further pleaded that the
workman has been acquitted on account of benefit of
doubt and therefore his conduct does not warrant his
reinstatement. Further his appointment was not in
consonance of the Recruitment Rules hence, otherwise
also he has no legal right to claim employment.
In support of his case workman examined himself
and filed a copy of termination order and of judgment of
Criminal Court given in the criminal case. The documents
have been marked as ‘A’ and ‘B’. On behalf of the
management P.C. Akela, Senior Administrative Officer of
PGIMER examined himself and filed papers.Exhibit M2 to
M8.
I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and
perused the evidence on record. The facts of the case are
not in dispute. As is clear from the termination order Exhibit
M8 dated 12.7.1997 the services of the workman were
terminated after preliminary inquiry on the ground that
the workman had remained in police custody w.e.f.
31.12.1996 to 2.1.1997 and this conduct of the workman
was unbecoming of an employee.
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4141
The argument of the learned counsel for workman is
that the termination of the service is a major penalty and it
can be inflicted only after a departmental inquiry
conducted according to the principle of natural justice.·
The workman should have been charge-sheeted and
informed about the specific allegations along with
proposed evidence against him, he must have been
provided an opportunity to plead his case, the documents
should have been made available to him and an
opportunity of hearing should have been given to him.
Preliminary inquiry is not a departmental inquiry and is
simply a fact finding inquiry in which the participation of
the workman was not necessary even.
The learned counsel for the management on the
other hand argued that in the first place the workman was
a daily wager initially appointed for a period of 89 days
and no procedure had been followed in his appointment,
therefore he has no right to claim employment with the
management. Secondly in the inquiry he had been given
opportunity to present his case before the Inquiry Officer
and in his statement dated 21.3.1997 he had admitted that
he could not inform his superiors on account of his
ignorance of the rules in this regard. Therefore the
termination order is according to law and the workman is
not entitled to any relief.
It is true that workman had been appointed in a short
term vacancy as a daily wager on contract through
appointment letter Exhibit M2 but this appointment was
only for 89 days. The workman continued in the
employment of the management even after the period of
89 days mentioned in this letter. It is also true that there is
nothing on record to show that’ the workman had been
employed as per Recruitment Rules. Hence it is clear that
he has no right to the post but it does not mean that the
management is at liberty to throw the workman on streets
without following the procedure.
From the record it appears that instead of a charge-
sheet containing detailed information about the allegations
against him the workman had been handed over a Memo
Exhibit M5 issued by the Inquiry Officer requiring the
workman to attend his office on the given date and time to
explain his position. In the letter mentioned subject is
“regarding arrest of Sh. Pawan Kumar S/o Sh. Motha Singh,
Safaiwala PGI, Chandigarh.” Neither the date of arrest nor
the duration of custody nor the proposed evidence and
nor the reference of the Rule violated by the workman is
mentioned in the said memo.
Secondly, as is Clear from the termination order
Exhibit M8 the services of the workman were terminated
because he had remained under the police custody for
more than 48 hours under the provisions of Criminal
Procedure Code and his conduct was unbecoming of an
employee. There is no reference of any rule or provision
which declares the detention of a Government servant for
more than 48 hours as unbecoming of a Government
employee.
Here it is important to note that as per G.I., M.H.A.
Letter No.39/59/54-Est.(A) dated 25th February, 1955
referred at page 10 in para 2 under ‘GOVERNMENT OF
INDIA’S DECISION’ in Swami’s Compilation of Conduct
Rules it is the duty of a Government servant who may be
arrested for any reason to intimate the fact of his arrest
and the circumstances connected therewith to his official
superior promptly even though he might have
subsequently been released on bail. Failure on the part of
any Government servant to so inform his official superior
will be regarded as suppression of material information
and will render him liable to disciplinary action on this
ground alone, apart from the action that may be called for
on the outcome of the police case against him.
It shows that merely detention in a criminal case is
not sufficient to warrant any departmental action. It is the
failure of the Government servant to inform his superiors
about his detention which may invite disciplinary action
against him. In this case the services of the workman has
not been terminated on the ground that he did not inform
his superiors about his detention. But his services were
terminated simply on the ground of detention which in my
opinion is not according to law.
I am therefore of the view that in the present case
neither a proper departmental inquiry was conducted nor
the order dated 12.4.1997 of the management of PGI,
Chandigarh in removing the workman is according to law
and justified. The order dated 12.4.1997, therefore is
quashed and the workman is reinstated. The workman
however will not be entitled to any back wages and
continuous service in view of the fact that his appointment
was not according to rules. The management of PGI is
directed to reinstate the workman within one month after
receiving the copy of the award. The reference is
accordingly decided in favour of the workman. Hard and
soft copy of the Award be sent to the Central Government
and one copy of the Award be sent to the District Judge
Chandigarh for information and further necessary action.
A. K. RASTOGI, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 3 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1567-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ ,iQ-lh-
vkbZ- ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- 2] p.Mhx<+ ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k
537@2005) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 3&7&2013
dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹iQk- la- ,y&22012@233@1997&vkbZvkj (lh&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
4142
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
New Delhi, the 3rd July, 2013
S.O. 1567.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 537/
2005) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court No. 2, Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure,
in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation
to the management of FCI and their workmen, which was
received by the Central Government on 3-7-2013.
[ F. No. L- 22012/233/1997-IR (C-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL
TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT-II,
CHANDIGARH
Present : Sri A.K. Rastogi, Presiding Officer
Case No. 537/2005
Registered on 22.8.2005
Sh. Birbal Singh S/o Sh. Ishar Singh,
Khamal Kalan, Tehsil Suman, Sangrur
......Applicant
Versus
Regional Manager, FCI, RO (PB),
Sector 34, Chandigarh
....Respondent
APPEARANCES
For the Workman
-
Sh. R.P. Rana, Adv.
For the Management
-
Sh. Santokh Singh, Adv.
AWARD
Passed on 6.6.2013
Vide Order No. L-22012/233/97-IR(CM-II), dated
22.07.1998 the Central Government in exercise of the
powers conferred by Clause (d) of sub-section (1) and
Sub-Section 2(A) of Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act,
1947 (in short Act) has referred the aforesaid industrial
disputes for adjudication to the Tribunal.
“Whether the action of the management of Food
Corporation of India in terminating the services of
Sh. Birbal Singh S/o Sh. Isher Singh, w.e.f. 01.11.1992
is legal and justified? If not, to what relief is the
workman entitled and from which date?”
As per claim statement the workman had been
employed as Pelladar on 20.4.1985 and his services were
terminated on 1.11.1992 without any notice, charge-sheet,
inquiry and compensation. While terminating his services
juniors were retained and after his termination new hands
were also employed. He was a member of EPF. His
termination is illegal and unjustified. He has prayed for
his reinstatement with continuity of service and full back
wages.
Management filed written statement and
subsequently amended written statement. According to
management workman was never employed in FCI as
Pelladar hence, the question of termination from service
does not arise. It was also denied that he was member of
the Employees Provident Fund. According to management
he may be under the EPF through his employer
M/s Gurcharan Singh and Company who was the Handling
Transport Contractor during the period from 20.3.1991 to
19.3.1993. It was also denied that the FCI paid any salary
to the workman.
In evidence workman examined himself while on
behalf of management Mohinder Singh, Area Manager
was examined. Workman had summoned attendance
register from the management on which the management
had replied that since the workman was not in his
employment hence no record of his evidence was being
maintained by the management.
I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and
perused the evidence on record. I need not to say that
since the workman is alleging to be in the employment of
the management hence, it was for him to prove the fact.
He however has failed in proving the relationship of
employer and employee between the management and
himself. From his statement it is clear that he was not
registered with the Employment Exchange and there was
no notification in the newspapers for the vacancies. There
is no appointment letter and there is no evidence that he
was being paid by the management. He had filed a
photocopy of an I. Card issued from FCI but said nothing
in his statement about this document. The management
witness in his statement denied that the workman had
been employed by management or he was removed from
the service by the management.
From the evidence on record it is clear that the
workman has failed to prove his employment and
termination by the management. No question of legality
and justification of the termination from service of the
workman by the management arise. The reference is
answered against the workman. He is not entitled to any
relief. Let soft copy and hard copy of the award be sent to
the Central Government for further necessary action.
ASHOK KUMAR RASTOGI, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 3 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1568-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ ,iQ-lh-
vkbZ- ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa jk"Vªh; vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k]
eqacbZ ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 1@2007) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks
dsUæh; ljdkj dks 3&7&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹iQk- la- ,y&22012@28@2002&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4143
New Delhi, the 3rd July, 2013
S.O. 1568.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 1/
2007) of the National Tribunal, Mumbai as shown in the
Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the
management of Food Corporation of India and their
workmen, received by the Central Government on 3-7-
2013.
[ F. No. L- 22012/28/2002-IR (CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL,
MUMBAI
Present :
Justice G. S. Sarraf, Presiding Officer
COMPLAINT NO. NTB-1 OF 2007
(Arising out of Ref. No. NTB-1 of 2003)
Parties:
FCI Workers Union, Calcutta
.....Complainant
V/s.
Food Corporation of India,
New Delhi
..... Opposite Party
Appearance :
For the Complainant
:
Mr. Umesh Nabar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party
: Mr. Prabhakar Rao, Advocate
Mumbai, dated 30th day of May, 2013.
AWARD
The complainant has filed this complaint under
Section 33-A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
Final arguments heard.
The applicant has filed this complaint with the prayer
that the rate of payment of the wages applicable to the
workmen immediately before the commencement of the
proceedings under Ref. NO. NTB-1 of 2003 be restored
and the circular no. 16 of 2006 dt. 27. 7 .2006 and letter
No. IR(L)/3(6)/88- Vo1.III dt. 6.11.2006 be quashed and set
aside.
By circular no. 7/2007 dt. 9.10.2007 issued by the FCI
the circular no.16 dt. 27. 7 .2006 referred to hereinabove
has been kept in abeyance till the proceedings before the
National Industrial Tribunal in the instant matter are closed
and the Regional Offices have been directed to calculate
and implement the respective ASOR percent applicable to
DPS workers as per the Headquarters Circular no. l0/2006
dt 4.4.2006 till further orders.
It is thus clear that the circular no. 16 of 2006 dt.
27.7.2006 which changed the service conditions of the
workmen and which has been challenged by the F.C.I.
Workers Union by way of this complaint has already been
placed in abeyance by the F.C.I. till the disposal of Ref.
No. NTB-1 of 2003.
In view of the above the circular no. 16 of 2006 dt.
27.7.2006 will remain in abeyance till the decision in the
decision in Ref. No. NTB-1 of 2003 and thereafter the FCI
will issue fresh circular in accordance with the award in
NTB-l of 2003.
The complaint stands disposed of as above .
JUSTICE G. S. SARRAF, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 3 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1569-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ ,lbZlh,y
ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 46@2007)
çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 3&7&2013 dks çkIr gqvk
Fkk A
¹iQk- la- ,y&22012@30@2006&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 3rd July, 2013
S.O. 1569.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 46/
2007) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in the
Industrial Dispute between the management of Johilla Area
of SECL, and their workmen, received by the Central
Government on 3-7-2013.
[ F. No. L- 22012/30/2006-IR (CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM-LABOUR-COURT,
JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/46/07
PRESIDING OFFICER : SHRI R. B. PATLE
The President,
Koyla Mazdoor Sabha (HMS),
PO Nowrozabad,
Umaria (MP)
....Workman/Union
Versus
Chief General Manager,
Johilla Area of SECL,
PO Nowrozabad,
Umaria (MP)
....Management
4144
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
AWARD
Passed on this 6th day of June, 2013
1. As per letter dated 1-5-2007 by the Government
of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is
received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under
Section 10 of I.D. Act, 1947 as per Notification
No. L-22012/30/2006-IR(CM-II). The dispute under
reference relates to:
‘
“ Whether the action of the management of SECL in
non-payment of alleged deduction from salary and
not to stop such deduction from salary is legal and
justified? If not, to what relief are the workmen
entitled?”
2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to
the parties. However workman failed to appear. Workman
is proceeded exparte as per order dated 13-7-2011. IInd
party filed Written Statement on 16-5-2012.
3. IInd party contends that it is not case of other
party that any deduction is being made from the salary
continuously. That there was no deduction as alleged by
the workers. The workers voluntarily donated
contributions for performing Ramlila followed by
celebration of Durga Puja. The management formed Joint
Consultative Committee(JCC) for discussion of all the
issues arising at the colliery level. The representatives of
Central Trade Unions are members of the said JCC. That
Durga Puja are celebrated by the employees. The
expenditure required to celebrate the Durga Puja/
Celebrating Ramlila is arranged through a committee being
constituted with participation of Union representative as
well as the management. That the meeting of Puja
Committee was held on 19-9-04. The Committee
unanimously decided to collect donations category-wise
between Rs. 70 to Rs. 160. As per said decision, the
donation were collected from employees with their
consent. It is submitted that no other Union raised
objection to those donation except representative of HMS
Union. That as no objection was made by employees for
refund of donation, the reference needs to be rejected.
4. Considering pleadings on record, the points
which arise for my consideration and determination are as
under. My findings are recorded against each of them for
the reasons as below :—
(i) Whether the action of the
management of SECL non-
payment of alleged deduction
from salary and not to stop
such deduction from
salary is legal and justified?
In Affirmative
(ii) If so, to what relief the
Relief prayed by
workman is entitled to?”
workman are rejected.
REASONS
5. Present reference relates to legality of collection
of donation from salary. However the 1st party Union has
not participated in the reference, Statement of claim is not
filed, no evidence is adduced to substantiate their claim.
6. Management of IInd party filed Written Statement
and affidavit of evidence contending that the ‘donation
for Durga Puja were collected as per the JCC meeting held
on 19-9-2004. The evidence remained unchallenged.
Documents are produced. As the Union failed to submit
statement of claim and adduce evidence, action of the
management cannot be said illegal. For above reasons, I
record my finding in Point No.1 in Affirmative.
7. In the result, the award is passed as under :—
“Action of the management of SECL in non-payment
of alleged deduction from salary and not to stop
such deduction from salary is legal. The relief prayed
by 1st party Union is rejected.”
8. Let the copies of the award be sent to the
Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment
as per rules.
R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 3 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1570-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ ,lbZlh,y
ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 84@2003)
dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 3&7&2013 dks çkIr
gqvk Fkk A
¹iQk- la- ,y&22012@156@2002&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 3rd July, 2013
S.O. 1570.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 84/
2003) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in the
Industrial Dispute between the management of Sohagpur
Area of SECL, and their workmen, received by the Central
Government on 3-7-2013.
[ F. No. L- 22012/156/2002-IR (CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRlBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/84/2003
Presiding Officer : Shri R. B. Patle
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4145
The Secretary,
M.P.Koyla Mazdoor Sabha (HMS),
Sohagpur Area of SECL,
PO Dhanpuri,
Distt. Shahdol
....Workman/Union
Versus
Chief General Manager,
Sohagpur Area of SECL,
PO Dhanpuri,
Distt. Shahdol (MP)
....Management
AWARD
Passed on this 6th day of June, 2013
1. As per letter dated 8-5-2003 by the Government
of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is
received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under
Section 10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.
L-22012/156/2002-IR(CM-II). The dispute under reference
relates to :
“ Whether the demand of Shri Intezar Ali, Survey
Mazdoor, Baiga OCM of SECL under Sohagpur Area
(represented by M.P. Koyla Mazdoor Sabha) to
regularize him as Typist/Clerk w.e.f. 22-9-94 alongwith
payment of difference of wages is legal and justified?
If so, to what relief the workman is entitled to?”
2. After notice, Ist party/workman submitted
Statement of claim at page 2/1 to 2/3 contending that the
workman was entitled for regularisation claimed by him.
The IInd party management submitted Written Statement
at Page 7/1 to 7/8 denying all material contentions of 1st
party. The parties have adduced evidence. Today when
the case is fixed for cross-examination of management’s
witness, the 1st party submitted application that he desires
to withdraw the case. Workman is present and admits that
he is not interested to prosecute his claim, therefore the
claim needs to be disposed of.
3. In the result, award is passed as under :—
“Claim of 1st party/workman stands disposed of as
withdrawn.”
R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 3 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1571-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ MCY;wlh,y
ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 51@2007)
dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 3&7&2013 dks çkIr
gqvk Fkk A
¹iQk- la- ,y&22012@10@2007&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 3rd July, 2013
S.O. 1571.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 51/
2007) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in the
Industrial Dispute between the management of Western
Coalfields Limited, and their workmen, received by the
Central Government on 3-7-2013.
[F. No. L- 22012/10/2007-IR (CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
JABALPUR
No. CGIT/LC/R/51/07
Presiding Officer : SHRI R. B. PATLE
The General Secretary,
Bhartiya Koyla Khadan Mazdoor Sangh (BMS),
Vishwakarma Bhawan,
Post Parasia,
Distt. Chhindwara
...Workman/Union
Versus
Chief General Manager,
Western Coalfields Limited,
Kanhan Area,
PO Dungaria,
Chhindwara
...Management
AWARD
Passed on this 10th day of June 2013
1. As per letter dated 26-6-2007 by the Government
of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is
received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under
Section 10 of I.D. Act, 1947 as per Notification No. L-22012/
l0/2007-IR(CM-II). The dispute under reference relates to :
“Whether the action of the management of M/s WCL
in not correcting the date of initial appointment of
Shri Ramakant Singh as 4-5-1980 is legal and justified?
If not, to what relief is the workman entitled?”
2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to
the parties. 1st party workman failed to submit .his
statement of claim. He is proceeded exparte on 13-7-2011.
The management filed Written Statement on 19-12-2011.
The management of IInd party submits that the workman
along with other were engaged as casual labours
4146
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
intermittently as and when required basis. The management
decided to regularize those persons engaged as casuals
as soon as regular vacancy of General Mazdoor arose.
The eligibility of selection against regular vacancy is that
one should be ex-casual and have put in attendance not
less than 190/240 days.
3. It is further submitted that the Sub Area Manager,
Nandan Colliery opposed for regularization to 202 casual
workers into General Mazdoor Cat-I who had completed
190/240 days for underground and surface. That Ist party
workman was regularized as General Mazdoor along with
other labours whose name was appearing at Sl. No. 19 of
list. He was regularized w.e.f. 6-2-82. The list was approved
by General Manager, Kanhan Area on next day. The said
claim of 1st party for correction of date of appointment as
7-9-1980 cannot be accepted. IInd party prayed for rejection
of award.
4. Considering pleadings on record, the points
which arise for my consideration and’ determination are as
under. My findings are recorded against each of them for
the reasons as below :—
(i)
Whether the action of the
In Affirmative
management of M/s WCL in
not correcting the date of
initial appointment of Shri
Ramakant Singh as 4-5-1980
is legal and justified?
(ii) If so, to what relief the
Relief prayed by
workman is entitled to?”
workman is rejected.
REASONS
5. Ist party is praying for correcting of date of
regularization in General Mazdoor Category from 4-5-1980
as per the terms of reference. He failed to file his statement
of claim. Ilnd party submitted Written Statement and
contents that Ist party was regularized in General Mazdoor
Category-I from 6-2-1982. The affidavit of evidence of
management Mr. P. K. Tripathi also states that Ist party
workman was regularized in General Mazdoor category
from 6-2-84. The General Manager, Kanhan Area had
approved said list on 7-2-82. Evidence of witness remained
unchallenged. I find no reason to disbelieve his statement
on oath. For above reasons, I record my finding in Point
No.1 in Affirmative.
6. In the result, award is passed as under :—
“(1)
The action of the management of M/s WCL
in not correcting the date of initial
appointment of Shri Ramakant Singh as
4-5-1980 is legal and justified.
(2)
Relief prayed by workman is rejected.”
R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 3 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1572-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ ,lbZlh,y
ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 33@2007)
dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 3&7&2013 dks çkIr
gqvk Fkk A
¹iQk- la- ,y&22012@29@2006&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 3rd July, 2013
S.O. 1572.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 33/
2007) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in the
Industrial Dispute between the management of Johilla Area
of SECL, and their workmen, received by the Central
Government on 3-7-2013.
[ F. No. L- 22012/29/2006-IR (CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
JABALPUR
No. CGIT/LC/R/33/07
Presiding Officer : SHRI R. B. PATLE
The President,
Koyla Shramik Sabha (UTUC),
Central Committee,
Vindhya Colony,
Umaria (MP)
...Workman/Union
Versus
Chief General Manager,
Johilla Area of SECL,
PO Nowrozabad,
Umaria (MP)
...Management
AWARD
Passed on this 16-5-2013
1. As per letter dated 28-02-2007 by the Government
of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is
received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under
Section -10 of I.D. Act, 1947 as per Notification No. L-22012/
29/2006-IR(CM-II). The dispute under reference relates to :
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4147
“Whether the action of the management of SECL in
not providing employment to the dependent of Late
Shri Chamroolal Yadav is legal and justified? If not,
to what relief is the dependent of the deceased
workman entitled?”
2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to
the parties. Ist party dependent failed to appear. She was
proceeded exparte on 21-7- 2011.
3. Management filed Written Statement on 27-1-2012
“denying the claim of the depending for appointment on
compassionate ground. IInd party submits that under Rule-
10 of I.D.Act, the parties raising dispute needs to file
statement of claim with relevant documents. Ist party
workman has not complied said provisions. Union did not
filed any statement of claim. That the service conditions
of Coal Mine Workers are covered by Standing Orders,
NCWA, Circulars Instructions issued by management time
to time etc. clause 9.3.2/9/4/0/9.5.0 deals with providing
dependant employment in case a workman died during the
course of employment. The application is required to be
submitted within 5 years. That Ist party dependent had
not submitted application within 5 years. Late Chamroolal
Yadav was employed as loader, Token No. 377(P) died on
14-6-1985. The dependents did not approach to the
management for employment. The dependent is getting
family pension. Smt. Phoolbai, widow of deceased workman
submitted application for employment in 1995. Her
application could not be considered as highly belated.
The purpose of providing employment to the dependent
of Govt. servant dying in harness in preference to anybody
else is to mitigate hardship. Such appointments are
permissible on compassionate ground as per the rules.
Management submits that as application is submitted after
10 years, It cannot be considered.
4. Considering pleadings on record, the points
which arise for my consideration and determination are as
under. My findings are recorded against each of them for
the reasons as below :—
(i)
Whether the action of the
In Affirmative
management of SECL in not
providing employment to the
dependent of Late Shri
Chamroolal Yadav is legal
and justified?
(ii) If so, to what relief the
Relief prayed by
workman is entitled to?”
dependence of
deceased
workman is
rejected.
REASONS
5. The reference relates to denial of employment on
compassionate ground to widow of Late Chamroolal.
However the 1st party dependent has not submitted
statement of claim. 1st party workman is proceeded exparte.
Management of IInd party filed Written statement
contending that the application for compassionate ground
was submitted within 5 years, rather the application was
submitted after 10 years. As per rules, application cannot
be considered. Affidavit of management’s witness I.G.
Thulsidhara Kurup is filed covering most of the contention
of the IInd party in Written Statement. His evidence
remained unchallenged as the Ist party workman failed to
cross-examine the said witness of the management. IInd
party has produced copy of Implementation Instruction
Annexure M-l. Clause 3.6 provides that :—
“Provision of employment/monetary compensation
to female dependants of workmen who die while in
service and who are declared medically unfit as per
Clause 9.4.0 above would be regulated as under.-
(i)
In case of death due to mine accident, the
female dependent would have the option to
either accept the monetary compensation of
Rs. 3000 per month of employment irrespective
of her age.
(ii)
In case of death/total permanent disablement
due to causes other than mine accident and
medical unfitness under Clause 9.4.0 (NCWA-
V), if the, female dependent is upto the age of
45 years, she will have the option either to
accept the monetary compensation of Rs. 2000/
per month or employment.
6. Document Annexure M-2 produced by
management Item No. 242.6 reads as under :—
“ It was decided that the employment for
dependent under the provision of 9.3.2 , 9.4.0
and 9.5.0 will be considered on routine basis and
those cases which are older than 5 years or more
shall be reopened for consideration on case to
case basis.
In other words cases which are older than 5 years
or more will not be considered and it can only be
reopened if there is full justification for the same.”
7. In present case, as per affidavit of management’s
witness dependent has not filed Statement of claim neither
filed any evidence. The claim of Ist party dependent is not
substantiated. For above reasons, I record my finding on
Point No.1 in Affirmative.
8. In the result, award is passed as under:-
(i)
Action of the IInd party management in not
providing employment to the dependent of Late
Shri Chamroolal Yadav is legal.
(ii) Relief claimed by dependent of deceased
workman is rejected.
R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer
4148
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ubZ fnYyh] 3 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1573-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ ,l bZ lh
,y ds çca/ra=k ds laca¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky; tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 30@2010)
dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 3&7&2013 dks çkIr
gqvk Fkk A
¹iQk- la- ,y&22012@60@2009&vkbZ vkj (lh,e&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 3rd July, 2013
S.O. 1573.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. 30/2010)
of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial
Dispute between the management of Rajendra-Navgaon
Sub Area of SECL, and their workmen, received by the
Central Government on 3-7-2013.
[ F. No. L- 22012/60/2009-IR (CM-II)]
B.M.PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/30/2010 PRESIDING OFFICER:
SHRI R. B. PATLE
The President,
Koyla Mazdoor. Sabha (HMS),
Near G.M.Office,
Dhanpuri, Shahdol ......Workman/Union
Versus
Sub Area Manager,
Rajendra Navgaon sub Area of SECL,
PO Khairaha,
Shahdol (MP) .......Management
AWARD
Passed on this 11th day of June 2013
1. As per letter dated 25-3-2010 by the
Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi,
the reference is received. The reference is made to this
Tribunal under Section-10 of I.D. Act, 1947 as per
Notification No. L-22012/60/2009-IR(CM-II). The dispute
under reference relates to:
“Whether the action of the management of M/s
SECL in imposing penalty of removal/discharge
from service on Shri Khelawan S/o Shri Mangal
w.e.f. 27-11-2006 is legal and justified? To what
relief is the claimant workman entitled for ?”
2. Ist party Union is challenging removal/
discharge from service of workman Shri Khelawan in
the dispute under reference. Even after issuing notices,
the Union has not participated in the proceeding, no
statement of claim is filed. 1st party is proceeded exparte
on 5-12-2012.
3. IInd party management also not filed Written
Statement. From conduct of the 1st party, it is clear
that the parties are not pursuing or participating in the
dispute.
4. In the result, award is passed as under :—
“Reference is disposed off as No Distpute
Award.”
5. Let the copies of the award be sent to the
Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment
as per rules.
R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 3 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1574-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ MCY;w lh
,y ds çca/ra=k ds laca¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky; tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 70@2008)
dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 03&07&2013 dks
çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹iQk- la- ,y&22012@20@2008&vkbZ vkj (lh,e&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 3rd July, 2013
S.O. 1574.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award Ref. 70/2008 of
the Cent.Govt.Indus. Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur
as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between
the management of WCL, and their workmen, received by
the Central Government on 03-07-2013.
[ F. No. L- 22012/20/2008-IR (CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/70/08
Presiding Officer : Shri R. B. PATLE
General Secretary,
Sanyukta Koyala Mazdoor Sangh(AITUC),
CRO Camp, Iklehra,
Chhindwara
...Workman/Union
Versus
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4149
Chief General Manager,
WCL, Pench Area,
PO Parasia,
Chhindwara
...Management
AWARD
Passed on the 13th day of May, 2013
1. As per letter dated 9-6-2008 by the Government
of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference
is received. The reference is made to this Tribunal
under Section 10 of I.D. Act, 1947 as per Notification
No. L-22012/20/2008-IR(CM-II). The dispute under
reference relates to:
“Whether the action of the management of M/s
WCL in dismissing Shri Arif Khan w.e.f. 23-5-2007
is legal and justified? To what relief is the
concerned workman entitled?”
2. After receiving reference, notices were issued
to the parties. 1st party workmen despite of repeated
notices issued to him did not turn up or file his
statement of claim. 1st party was proceeded ex parte
on 21-1-2011.
3. Management filed ex parte Written Statement
on 12-5-2011. It is submitted that workman was working
as Haulage Khalasi at Vishnupuri U/G Mine No. 1, he
was habitual absentee from duty. He did not show
interest in his work. Despite of it, management granted
him several opportunities to improve his performance.
1st party workman was unauthorisely absent from July
2002. His whereabouts were not known. Chargesheet
were issued to him under clause 24,26.30 of Standing
Orders. The chargesheet was sent by registered post
on address recorded in Form B register, Registered
envelope was received back unserved. The Enquiry
Officer was appointed. Shri R.K. Sinha, Sr. Personnel
Officer was appointed as Enquiry Officer, Mr. Yezdas
Sr. Under Manager Vishnupuri was appointed as
management representative. Despite of memo issued
on 10-11-06, 16-12-06, 5-1-07, Ist party workman could
not be served. Public notice was issued in Delhi Raj
Express dated 1-2-07. The enquiry was conducted
against 1st party workman. Enquiry Officer recorded
finding and charges were proved. As per his
unauthorized absence, services of 1st party workman
were terminated as per order dated 21-05-07. IInd party
submits that termination of 1st party workman after
holding Departmental Enquiry is legal and prays for
rejection of claim of 1st party workman.
4. Considering pleadings on record, the points
which arise for my consideration and determination are
as under. My findings are recorded against each of
them for the reasons as below :—
(i)
Whether the termination
of Ist party workman
In Affirmative
Shri Arif Khan w.e.f.
23-5-2007 by the
management is legal ?
(ii) If so, to what relief the
As per final order
workman is entitled to ?”
REASONS
5. Present reference is directed for adjudication
of legality of termination of Ist party workman.
No statement of claim has been filed by workman. IInd
party filed Written Statement and contended that
unauthorized absence of workman was proved in
enquiry proceeding therefore services of Ist party
workman are terminated. Affidavit of evidence of IInd
party witness Shri R.S. Prasad is produced. He has
stated most of the facts pleaded in Written Statement
of IInd party. It is submitted that despite of repeated
notices and memos, Ist party remained absent in the
enquiry. From evidence in enquiry proceedings, charges
of unauthrized absence against workman are proved. In
pursuance of the report of the Enquiry Officer, services
of Ist party workman are terminated from 23-5-07. The
evidence of witness of IInd party gone unchallenged.
Ist party workman failed to participate in the reference
proceeding, failed to cross-examine the management’s
witness. He also not filed statement of claim.
Considering the evidence on record, as services of Ist
party workman are terminated for unauthorized absence
proved in the Enquiry Proceeding, action of the IInd
party is legal. Accordingly I record my finding on
Point No. 1 in Affirmative.
6. In the result, award is passed as under :—
(1) Action of the IInd party management in
terminating the services of 1st party workman
Shri Arif Khan w.e.f. 23-5-2007 is legal.
(2) Relief prayed by 1st party workman is rejected.
R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 3 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1575-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ , ,l
vkbZ ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky; tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 183@2001)
dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 03&07&2013 dks
çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹iQk- la- ,y& 42012@70@2001&vkbZ vkj (lh,e&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
4150
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
New Delhi, the 3rd July, 2013
S.O. 1575.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 183/
2001) of the Cent.Govt.Indus. Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,
Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute
between the management of Archaeological Survey of
India, and their workman, which was received by the Central
Government on 03-07-2013.
[ F. No. L- 42012/70/2001-IR (CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/183/2001
Presiding Officer : Shri R. B. PATLE
Shri Shivraj Singh,
S/o Pokhan Singh,
C/o Mahesh Prasad Dubey,
Postal Deptt. Chanderi,
Guna
...Workman
Versus
Asstt. Superindendent,
Archaeological Survey of India,
Archaeological Museum,
Singhpur Palace,
P.O. Chanderi,
Guna
..Management
AWARD
Passed on this 12th day of June, 2013
1. As per letter dated 27-11-2001 by the
Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi,
the reference is received. The reference is made to this
Tribunal under Section 10 of I.D. Act, 1947 as per
Notification No. L-42012/70/2001-IR(CM-II). The dispute
under reference relates to:
“Whether the action of the management of Asstt.
Supdt. Archaeologist, Archaeological Survey of
India, Chanderi in terminating the services of Shri
Shivraj Singh S/o Pokhan Singh w.e.f. 1-1-1996 is
justified ? If not, to what relief the workman is
entitled for ?”
2. After receiving reference, notices were issued
to the parties. Workman submitted statement of claim
at page 4/1 to 4/3. The case of Ist party workman is
that he was initially engaged on 1-7-94 on daily wages
against vacant post of watchman in regular
establishment after continuously working for more than
six months with the satisfaction of the management.
His name was sponsored from Employment Exchange,
selection process was undertaken, he was interviewed
by the management on 20-2-95. He was found suitable
for regular appointment. However he was appointed on
temporary basis from 21-2-95. After working for 544
days including holidays from 1-7-94 to 31-12-95, the
services were terminated from 1-1-1996. It is submitted
by workman that he was not paid retrenchment
compensation, no notice was issued to him, salary in
lieu of notice period was not paid to him. Shri Salim,
Vijay, Pappu, Bhallavi, Rajesh and Prakash were engaged
as watchman after his termination. He was not given
opportunity for re-employment. That the junior workmen
Vishram Singh, Indrapal and Salim working on daily
wages were inducted into regular establishment. The
Seniority list of daily wage workers was not published
on notice board at the time of his termination. He
submits that since his termination, he was required to
borrow money from his friends and relatives. His family
members are supporting for his basic necessity of life.
He is not gainfully employed. It is submitted that
termination of his service is in violation of Section 25-
F of I.D. Act, Rule-77 of Central Rules, 1957. He prays
for reinstatement with consequential benefits.
3. IInd party managment failed to file Written
Statement. As such proceeded ex parte on 7-9-07.
4. Considering pleadings on record, the points
which arise for my consideration and determination are
as under. My findings are recorded against each of
them for the reasons as below :—
(i)
Whether the termination
of the services of
In Negative
Shri Shivraj Singh
S/o Pokhan Singh
w.e.f. 1-1-1996 by
the Asstt. Supdt.
Archaeologist,
Archaeological Survey
of India, Chanderi is
justified ?
(ii) If so, to what relief the
As per final order
workman is entitled to ?”
REASONS
5. Workman is challenging termination of his
services from 1-1-96. That his services were terminated
in violation of Section 25-F, G & H. His juniors were
retained in service. He was not given notice, no
retrenchment compensation was paid. Pay in lieu of
notice was not paid to him. All those facts are covered
in affidavit of his evidence filed on 19-5-06. IInd party
management of Archaeeological survey of India failed
to participate in the proceeding. The evidence of
workman gone unchallenged. I find no reason to
disbelieve his evidence. The workman has produced
zerox copies of documents with list dated 27-12-2010.
However he has not rendered any of those documents
in his affidavit of evidence.
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4151
6. A bunch of citation is submitted on behalf of
workman. Ratio held in bunch of citation relates to
what is Industry as held in AIR-1978-Supreme Court
548(1). As there is no denial by the IInd party, the
issue doesnot arise. Therefore ratio held in all citations
in bunch submitted on his behalf needs no detailed
discussion. From unchallenged evidence of workman, it
is clear that he had completed 240 days continuous
service preceding his termination from 1-1-1996. His
services are terminated without giving retrenchment
compensation, not issuing notice or pay in salary in
lieu of notice. The list of retrenched employees were
not displayed on notice, junior employees were retained.
Thus the termination of service of workman is illegal
for violation of Sections 25-F, G & H of I.D.Act. I
accordingly record my finding on Point No. 1.
7. In the result, award is passed as under :—
(i) The action of the management of Asstt. Supdt.
Archaeologist, Archaeological Survey of India,
chanderi in terminating the services of Shri
Shivraj Singh S/o Pokhan Singh w.e.f. 1-1-1996
is illegal.
(ii) IInd party is directed to reinstate Shri Shivraj
Singh, S/o Shri Pokhan Singh with 50% back
wages.
R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 3 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1576-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ MCY;w lh
,y ds çca/ra=k ds laca¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky; tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 109@1993)
dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 03&07&2013 dks
çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹iQk- la- ,y&22012@44@1993&vkbZ vkj (lh,e&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 3rd July, 2013
S.O. 1576.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 109/
1993) of the Cent.Govt.Indus. Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,
Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute
between the management of WCL, and their workmen,
which was received by the Central Government on 03-07-
2013.
[ F. No. L- 22012/44/1993-IR (CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
JABALPUR
No. CGIT/LC/R/109/93
Presiding Officer : Shri R. B. PATLE
General Secretary,
M.P.K.K.M.P (HMS),
PO Junnardeo,
Distt. Chhindwara (MP)
...Workman/
Union
Versus
Manager,
WCL, Rakhikol Colliery,
Kanhan Area,
PO Rakhikol, Distt. Chhindeara (MP) ...Management
AWARD
Passed on this 13th day of June, 2013
1. As per letter dated 7-6-97 by the Government
of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference
is received. The reference is made to this Tribunal
under Section-10 of I.D. Act, 1947 as per Notification
No. L-22012/44/93-IR(CM-II). The dispute under
reference relates to:
“Whether the action of the Manager, Rakhikol
Colliery of WCL, Kanhan Area, PO Rakhikol Distt.
Chhindwara (MP) in dismissing the services of
Shri Bishram S/o Lotan, Casual Temp. D.P.R. w.e.f.
23-10-88 is justified ? If not, to what relief the
concerned workman is entitled to ?”
2. After receiving reference, notices were issued
to the parties. After notice, state of claim is submitted
by the Union at Pages 3. It is case of Union that
workman Shri Bisram Adivasi Truck Loader was
permanent worker, the work was of permanent nature.
He was working since 20-3-84. His work was neat and
clean. As and when management finds its manpower
surplus, the Adivasi and Harijans are the first target
due to illiteracy and poverty. That the management
put tham for her work and usually not provided full
scale in the month. That the services were verbally
terminated from 23-10-88 illegally. It is prayed that
workman be reinstated with back wages.
3. IInd party filed Written Statement at Page
5/1 to 5/4. IInd party submits that Bisram S/o Lotan
was casual employee, had not completed 190/240 day
attendance in any of the calendar year while in service
4152
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
of Rakhikol colliery. The workman was continuously
absent from duty from year 1987. For such absence
without permission, without intimation from authorities,
chargesheet was issued to him for unauthorized
absence. Enquiry of unauthorized absence was proved
beyond doubt. He was issued notice to appear and
participate in the enquiry. However the workman failed
to appear before enquiry officer. That the unauthorized
absence from duty is proved misconduct. As per report
of the Enquiry Officer for unauthorized absence from
1987 punishment of dismissal was imposed. The Ist
party is not entitled to relief prayed by him.
4. Ist party workman submitted rejoinder at page
8/1 to 8/3. His earlier contentions are reiterated that
services of workman are illegally terminated in violation
of provision of I.D. Act. That he had completed 240
days continuous service during each of the year .
5. The enquiry was held valid as per order dated
1-4-2011. The following points which arise for my
consideration and determination are as under. My
findings are recorded against each of them for the
reasons as below :—
(i)
Whether the charge of un-
In Affirmative
authorized absence against
workman is proved from
evidence in the Enquiry
proceeding.
(ii)
Whether the punishment of
In Affirmative
dismissal from service is just
and proper ?
(iii)
If so, to what relief the work-
Relief prayed
man is entitled to?”
by workman
is rejected.
REASONS
6. As discussed above as per order dated
1-4-2011, the enquiry held against workman is found
legal and proper. Workman has not adduced evidence
on other issues. Record of enquiry Proceedings is
produced by management with list at Page 16. The
evidence in enquiry shows that workman was absent
in the year 1987 without any intimation. At the time of
argument, learned counsel for management Mr. Shashi
argued that Coal Mine is essential industry. In absence
of the employee without intimation affects the working
of the mine. The unauthorized absence of workman is
proved from evidence in enquiry. The workman had
not participated in the enquiry. The misconduct is
proved from evidence. No evidence is adduced about
propriety of punishment of dismissal. I donot find
reason to interfere in the punishment. For the above
reason, I record my finding in Point No. 1, 2 in
Affirmative.
7. In the result, award is passed as under :—
(i) The action of the Manager, Rakhikol Colliery
of WCL, Kanhan Area, PO Rakhikol Distt.
Chhindwara (MP) in dismissing the services
of Shri Bishram S/o Lotan, Casual Temp.
D.P.R. w.e.f. 23-10-88 is justified.
(ii) Relief prayed by Ist party workman is rejected.
R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 4 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1577-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj LVsV cSad vkWiQ
ifV;kyk ds çca/ra=k ds laca¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds
chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky; paMhx<+&1 ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 2@2008)
dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 01&07&2013 dks
çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹iQk- la- ,y&12012@06@2008&vkbZ vkj (ch&1)º
lqefr ldykuh] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 4th July, 2013
S.O. 1577.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award Ref. 2/2008
of the Cent. Govt. Indus. Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,
No. 1, Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure, in the
industrial dispute between the management of State Bank
of Patiala, and their workmen, which was received by the
Central Government on 01-07-2013.
[ F. No. L- 12012/06/2008-IR (B-I)]
SUMATI SAKLANI, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRI S.P. SINGH, PRESIDING OFFICER,
CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIVUNAL-CUM-
LABOUR COURT-I, CHANDIGARH.
Case No. ID 2/2008.
Shri Dalel Singh Dahiya, House No.118, Behind Labour
Office, Bishan Saroop Colony, Panipat.
... Workman
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4153
Versus
(1) The Deputy General Manager, State Bank of
Patiala, Zonal Office, SCO-7, Sector-5, Panchkula
( Haryana)
(2) The Assistant General Manager-II, State Bank
of Patiala, SCO 9-10, Sector-25, HUDA, Panipat.
.....Management
Appearances :
For the workman :
Shri V. Sharma Advocate
For the management :
Shri S. K. Gupta Advocate
AWARD
Passed on 21-05-2013
Central Govt. vide letter No. L-12012/06/2008-IR
(B-I) dated 11-4-2008 has referred the following dispute
to this Tribunal for adjudication :
“Whether the action of the Asstt. General Manager,
State Bank of Patiala, Panipat Branch in imposing
penalty of removal from service of Sri Dalel Singh
Dahiya Ex-Head Cashier ‘E’ w.e.f 30-10-2005 is just,
fair and legal? If not, to what relief the workman is
entitled to and from which date ?”
2. The case of the workman as enumerated in claim
statement is that he joined the management of State Bank
of Patiala as Clerk-cum-Cashier, upgraded as Head Cashier
Category-E in the year 2002 and posted at Safidon Branch
of the bank. Suddenly he was placed under suspension by
leveling the charge on various lapses allegedly committed
by him during the posting at extension counter Municipal
Committee Safidon Branch. He was served with charge-
sheet which is as under :—
“While posted at Ext. Counter, Municipal
Committee Safidon of Safidon Branch you are alleged to
have committed certain acts of misconducts, which are
prejudiced to the bank’s interests, for which you are served
upon the following charge-sheet :—
Sh. Raj Singh Malik a customer of the Ext. Counter
made the following deposits at cash counter handled by
you at the Ext. counter Municipal Committee, Safidon. You
have given the counter folio slips of these deposits to the
Customer by putting bank’s receipts stamps under your
intitials and also made entries in his pass book, but you did
not deposit the amount in the Saving Bank a/c No. 11900-
15247 (New a/c No. 55109779290) of Sh. Raj Singh Malik
a customer maintaining saving bank a/c at the Ext. Counter,
Municipal Committee Safidon. The said money was
pocketed by you and defrauded the customer. Besides
pocketing the money, you tarnished the image of the bank.
The details of these deposits are mentioned hereunder.
Sr. Date of Deposit
Amount
1.
14-4-2004
4800.00
2.
16-7-2004
83000
3.
3-8-2004
200000
4.
18-8-2004
4800
5.
28-9-2004
60000
6.
14-10-2004
23000
7.
14-12-2004
4800
8.
22-12-2004
120000
9.
17-7-2005
200000
10. 28-7-2005
5700
11. 21-6-2005
4800
12. 16-9-2005
5700
13. 16-9-2005
120000
14. 29-2-2004
32000
You were called upon to explain you position on
10-10-2005 for the above irregularities, but you did not
submit the reply to the explanation despite you were
allowed to pursue the record of the branch, as requested
by you and you confirmed vide your acknowledgement
dated nil having pursued the record on 31-10-2005.
Thus aforesaid acts amounts to Gross Misconduct
in terms of Clause 5(j) of Memorandum of Settlement on
Disciplinary Action Procedure for workmen signed
between Indian Banks Association and The workmen
Unions at Mumbai on 10th April, 2002. You are advised to
submit your reply to the aforesaid charge sheet within
seven days from the date of receipt thereof failing which it
will be presumed that you have nothing to say and the
matter shall be proceeded with further.”
3. Regular departmental proceedings were held.
After conducting of the inquiry the workman was
provided with the copy of the inquiry report and was
served with show cause notice proposing the penalty of
major punishment, i.e. removal from service with
superannuation benefit. He was also granted personal
hearing by the disciplinary authority as well as by the
appellate authority. Appellate authority confirmed the
punishment of removal from service with superannuation
benefit. It is pleaded by the workman that appellate
authority rejected the appeal of the workman by non-
speaking order. It is pleaded by the workman that charge-
4154
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
sheet served upon him was without any list of documents
and list of witness and without any photocopy of the
document. It is further pleaded that allegations have
been levelled directly and in a pre-judged manner. He was
not allowed opportunity to file the defence statement. It is
further pleaded that findings of the Inquiry Officer are
based upon a case of no evidence and material documents
were considered by the Inquiry Officer behind the back of
the workman. Findings of the Inquiry Officer are not only
arbitrary and perverse but the same are result of distortion
of fact for the purpose of misleading the disciplinary
authority. It is a case of double jeopardy also. The findings
are without any assessment of evidence on the record of
inquiry. Crucial witnesses have not been examined and
therefore punishment order is liable to be vitiated. It is
further pleaded that order of removal from service is
unreasoned, non-speaking, arbitrary and perverse. The
copy of the proceedings recorded at the time of personal
hearing was not provided to the workman. It is pleaded
that the inquiry Officer conducted the inquiry against the
principle of natural justice and against the well-settled
principle of law. The workman was not provided with
opportunity of defence-during inquiry. It is prayed that
inquiry may be vitiated and order passed on the basis of
inquiry may be set aside and workman may be ordered to
be reinstated in service with full back wages.
4. The management filed written statement stating
there in that while the workman was posted at Safidon
Branch of the Bank a customer named Raj Singh Malik
made various deposits at cash counter. The workmen, given
the counter folio slips of the deposits'to the customer by
putting bank receipt stamp under his signature in token of
receipts of the amount and also made current entries in the
passbook of the customer. But the workman did not deposit
the amount in the Saving Bank Account of customer and
pocketed and misappropriated the same as many as
14 entries of the various amounts have been given in the
charge-sheet. When this misappropriation came to the
notice of the bank, workman was issued charge-sheet but
the workman preferred not to reply the same. Inquiry
proceedings were initiated. The Bank conducted the inquiry
in a fair and proper manner and in accordance with the
principles of natural justice. Disciplinary authority after
going through the inquiry report and evidence on record
inflicted the punishment of removal from service vide order
dated 30-6-2006 on the workman. Thus the management
adopted all fair and proper means to conduct the inquiry.
He was afforded full and proper opportunity to give his
defente and to prove his innocence. In view of the serious
misconduct committed by the workman the punishment of
removal from service was inflicted. It is also submitted by
the management that in case this Hon’ble Court comes to
the conclusion that inquiry has not been conducted in a
fair and proper manner and at any stage the principle of
natural justice has been violated during the inquiry
proceeding. In that eventuality the management reserve
its right to prove the charges before this Court. On merits
also it is pleaded by the management that inquiry was
conducted on various dates and the workman was given
full opportunity to prove his innocence but the punishment
was awarded after detailed and exhaustive inquiry. Therefore
the workman is not entitled for any relief and the reference
may be answere against the workman.
5. Replication was filed by the workman reiterating
the same contents as made in the claim statement. Workman
also placed on record his affidavit on the same pattern as
that of the claim statement.
6. My learned predecessor heard the arguments on
fairness of inquiry and vide order dated 22-7-2010 held as
under :—
“Thus I am of the view that enquiry was held in a fair
and proper manner. There has been no statutory lapse
while conducting the enquiry and there has also
been no violation of principle of natural justice while
conducting the enquiry by the enquiry officer.
There is a difference in conducting any enquiry in a
fair and proper manner and the decision making of the
enquiry officer and the disciplinary authority. There may
be cases where enquiry might have been conducted in a
fair and proper manner but the decision making i.e.; proving
of the charge by enquiry officer, may suffer with some
perversity. The enquiry officer might have taken into
consideration the evidence which was not on record or
has not considered the evidence which was not on record.
There may be the possibility of perversity in holding the
charge proved. For all these circumstances, it is mandatory
to afforded the opportunities to both of the parties on the
issue of perversity in decision making and on quantum of
punishment. Thus, both of the parties were afforded the
opportunity for adducing evidence on the following
issues :—
(1) The perversity in decision making of the enquiry
officer and the disciplinary authority, if any?
(2) The quantum of punishment.
Both of the parties are afforded the opportunity for
adducing evidence on the abovementioned issues on
10-8-2010. Parties be informed."
7. Now the limited question before this Tribunal is
whether there is any perversity in decision making of the
Inquiry Officer and the disciplinary authority and on
quantum of punishment. Learned counsel for the workman
during arguments submitted that the inquiry officer has
not called the complainant to prove the charges of
pocketing the money and misappropriating of the amount
as mentioned in the charge sheet. It is submitted by the
learned counsel for the workman that as the complainant
was not called therefore the workman was greatly
prejudiced by not calling the complainant before the Inquiry
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4155
Officer and he was also not subjected to cross-examination
by the workman on the charges. Learned counsel for the
workman also submitted that as crucial witness was not
examined therefore it is a fit case where the punishment of
removal which is harsh punishment cannot be imposed on
the workman. In support of his contention he has also
relied on judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court 1999 (1) SCT
303 Kuldeep Singh Vs. Commissioner of Police and 2005
(3) SCT 407 P.Erajan, lnspector of Police Vs. Deputy
Inspector General of Police,Trunelveli Range, a judgment
of Hon'ble Madras High Court to support his contentions.
It is prayed by the learned counsel for the workman that as
original complaint was not brought on record and crucial
witness was not produced, therefore, it is a fit case where
the punishment of removal from service can be substituted.
It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the
workman on quantum of punishment that removal from
service is harsh punishment and as the charges were not
proved complainant was not produced for cross-
examination by the workman, therefore, the punishment of
removal from service is very harsh and the workman is
entitled to reinstatement in service with full back wages
and other service benefits.
8. On the other hand the learned counsel for the
management submitted that the limited question before
this Tribunal is to see any perversity in decision making of
the Inquiry Officer and disciplinary authority and quantum
of punishment as per order dated 22-7-2010. From the
inquiry proceeding, not even a single instance has been
quoted by the workman that the Inquiry Officer has not
afforded opportunity to the workman. From the inquiry
preceding it is revealed that the workman was given
opportunity of defence and he was allowed to file reply to
the charge sheet but workman chose not to file the reply to
the charge sheet. Inquiry Officer was appointed with due
knowledge of the workman. Prosecution witnesses were
examined wherein the workman was allowed to cross-
examine the witnesses of the management. The workman
was also allowed to lead his defence during inquiry and,
there is not a single instance to show that the Inquiry
Officer was biased. The inquiry was conducted in
accordance with the principles of natural justice and he
was allowed full opportunity of defence Similarly the
disciplinary authority before inflicting the punishment
given show cause notice also given the personal hearing
to the workman and after completing all the formalities of
principle of natural justice inflicted the punishment of
removal from service which is not a swear one. Banking
institution runs on the faith of the public and the workman
was served with charge sheet as many as for pocketing the
money 14 times deposited by the customer of the bank.
He misappropriated the amount as proved from the inquiry
of eight transactions which is a very serious offence and
the punishment of removal from the service is very lesser
punishment. Rather the workman was to be given strict
punishment of dismissal from service so that other
employees may not indulge in such practice. The name of
the institution was badly affected by the act and conduct
of the workman and the workman is not entitled for any
relief whatsoever. The learned counsel for the management
also relied on the case laws 2006 (3) SLR 184 State Bank of
India an another Vs. Bela Bagchi and others, AIR 2000 SC
3028 State Bank of India Vs. Tarun Kumar Banerjee, 2009
(4) RSJ SC 444 UP State Road Tansport Corporation Vs.
Nanhe Lal Kushwaha, 1997 RSJ 692( Punjab & Haryana)
State of Punjab Vs. Nazar Singh and another 1997(3) RSJ
369 SC Punjab Dairy Development Corporation Ltd. and
another Vs. Kaka Singh, 2005(4) RSJ 636 (S.C.) V. Ramana
Vs. A.P.S.R.T.C. and others and 2007(3) RSJ page I.
9. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and
also gone through the case law submitted by both the
parties.
10. On 22-7-2010, the then presiding officer framed
the following Issues :
(1) The perversity in decision making of the enquiry
officer and the disciplinary authority, if any?
(2) The quantum of punishment.
11. From the perusal of the enquiry report it is clear
that enquiry officer found that the charges are partly
proved. Enquiry Officer while giving his findings clearly
mentioned that the charges to the extent marked as Ex.P-
6(1). Ex. P-7(1), Ex. P-8(1), Ex. P-9(1), Ex. P-l0(1), Ex. P-ll (1),
Ex. P-12 (1), Ex. P-13 (1), Ex. P-14 (1), Ex. P-15(1), Ex. P-16 (1),
Ex. P-17 (1), Ex. P-18 (1) were issued by the EPA as during
the enquiry the workman never denied having done so. It
is also proved that workman made the entries in his own
hand in the pass book of Shri Raj Singh Malik. Enquiry
Officer also observed that the charges not proved to the
extent that the entries dated 29-2-2004 for Rs. 32000/- and
workman is nothing to do with it being computerized
entry. The entry dated 17-7-2005 for Rs. Two lakhs is
concerned being Sunday which may not be a working day
in the normal course and BPO has not produced any
evidence to prove that it was a working day. The entry
dated 14-4-2004, 18-8-2004, 14-12-2004 and 21-6-2005 for
Rs. 4800/- each entry dated 28-7-2005 and 16-9-2005 for
Rs. 5700 each represent the cheques deposited by the
complainant and these are likely to be deposited after
collection. Thus from the perusal of the enquiry report, it is
clear that enquiry officer was not biased against the
workman nor any perversity occasioned.
12. It is pertinent to mention here that workman
himself examined as WWl and in cross-examination
workman stated that he cross-examined the witnesses of
the bank in departmental enquiry and enquiry officer given
him the opportunity of defence but he choose not to adduce
any defence evidence in enquiry. After supplying of the
copy of the enquiry report, disciplinary authority as well
as appellate authority provided him personal hearing. Thus
4156
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
the workman failed to point out any perversity in decision
making by the enquiry officer, disciplinary authority and
appellate authority. The case laws cited by the learned
counsel for the workman have no application in fact and
circumstances of the case. In fact, one of the case law cited
by the learned counsel for the management i.e. 2006 (3)
SLR 184 State Bank of India an another Vs. Bela Bagchi
and others apply to the facts and circumstances of the
case in hand being similar facts and circumstances in which
the punishment of dismissal from service was upheld by
the Hon’ble Supreme Court.
13. Thus it is held that there is no perversity at any
stage committed by the authorities of the bank and the
enquiry was conducted in a fair and proper manner adhering
to the settled principles of natural justice.
14. As regards quantum of punishment is concerned,
in view of the proved charges of misconduct of
misappropriation, the workman pocketed the money of a
customer and tarnished the image of the bank. The bank
lost confidence in him. Moreover the punishment of removal
from service with superannuation benefits is commensurate
with the proved misconduct of the workman and no
interference is called for in the punishment by this Tribunal.
15. In view of the discussion above, it is held that the
action of the Assistant General Manager, State Bank of
Patiala, Panipat Branch in imposing the penalty of removal
from service of Shri Dalel Singh Dahiya Ex-Head Cashier
'E' w.e.f. 30-10-2005 is just, fair and legal and the workman
is not entitled to any relief. The reference is answered
accordingly. A soft copy as well as hard copy be sent to
the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for
publication.
Chandigarh.
21-05-2013
S. P. SINGH, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 4 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1578-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj phiQ tujy
eSustj] ,e-Vh-,u-,y- ds çca/ra=k ds laca¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds
deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh;
ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k ua- 1] ubZ fnYyh ds iapkV (lanHkZ
la[;k 38@2013) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks
26&6&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹iQk- la- ,y&42025@07@2013&vkbZvkj(Mh;w)º
tksgu rksiuks] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 4th July, 2013
S.O. 1578.—In pursaunce of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central
Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1,
New Delhi (Filed under Section 33-A in the matter of
Complaint arising out of Ref. No. 38/2013) as shown in the
Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the Chief
General Manager, MTNL and their workman, which was
received by the Central Goverment on 26-06-2013.
[ F. No. L-42025/07/2013-IR(DU)]
JOHAN TOPNO, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE DR. R. K. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER,
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL
NO. 1, KARKARDOOMA COURTS COMPLEX,
DELHI
I.D. NO. 38/2013
The Chief General Manager,
MTNL, Khurshid Lal Bhawan,
New Delhi-110050. ......Applicant Management
Versus
The General Secretary,
MTNL Mazdoor Sangh,
D-14, Telegraph Square
Doctors Lane, Gole Market
New Delhi-110001 .......Respondent Union
AWARD
Pursuant to its decision to set up Mahanagar
Telephone Nigam Ltd. (in short the Nigam), a Public Sector
Corporation, Department of Telecommunications (DOT),
Ministry of Communications, Government of India, vide
order dated 18-03-1996 directed that on commencement of
operations of the Nigam with effect from 01-04-1986, the
staff of Delhi and Bombay telephone districts working
within the jurisdiction of Union Territory of Delhi and
Bombay, New Bombay and Thane Municipal areas will be
deemed to be transferred on deputation to the Nigam on
the existing terms and conditions without any deputation
allowance for a maximum period of five years and would
be manned by terms and conditions applicable to them
prior to formation of the Nigam. All employees of DOT
(Group C & D) on deemed deputation with Nigam were
given an option to either to opt for service of the Nigam or
revert back to their parent cadre. Employees who opted
for service of the Nigam were absorbed from 01-11-1998
onwards. Rules and regulations for service conditions
applicable to the employees of the Nigam were made
applicable to such employees.
2. While working for DOT, the employees used to
contribute towards CGHS and avail medical facilities from
CGHS dispensary as well as empanelled hospitals in
cashless mode. The Nigam introduce Indoor Medical
Scheme through M/s. ICICI Lombard General Insurance in
pursuance of settlement arrived at with majority union
MTNL Delhi and Mumbai, during the course of conciliation
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4157
proceedings. The said scheme was continued for
5-6 months. Later on the insurance company backed out
after paying back the premium for the balance period.
3. Health Insurance Scheme was then handed over
by the Nigam to United India Assurance Company, and a
sum of Rs. 45 crore was released to the Insurance
Company. The said action was taken by the Nigam by
taking a unilateral decision. Aggrieved by the said act, the
MTNL Staff Union (Class III and IV) (in short the union)
raised a demand for reverting back to the existing indoor
facilities. Since the demand was not acceded to, an
industrial dispute was raised by the union before the
Conciliation Officer. Since the Nigam contested the claim,
conciliation proceedings ended into a failure. On
consideration of failure report, submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, the appropriate Government referred
the dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication, vide order
No. L-40011/14/2011-IR(DU), New Delhi dated 8-5-2012,
with following terms :
“Whether the action of the management of MTNL,
New Delhi in extending the medical facilities to its
employees through an insurance company instead of
continuing with the existing indoor facilities is legal and
justified? If not, to what relief the employees of MTNL are
entitled to?
4. Claim statement was filed by the union pleading
that the Nigam attempted to wriggle out of the on going
medical policy formulated on the strength of wage
agreement dated 11-05-2010, without deliberating with the
union and purchased Health Insurance policies from the
United India Assurance Company for non-executive
employees of the Nigam. It was claimed that the act of the
Nigam in not taking the union into confidence tantamounts
to breach of memorandum of settlement dated 11-05-2010.
5. Claim was demurred by the Nigam pleading that
the claim is not maintainable as the Tribunal has no
jurisdiction to entertain it, since the claimant is asking for
recalling/quashing of circular No. MR/Circular/2008-09/
35 dated 15-03-2011, vide which circular No. MTNL/Co/
Pers.med.ins.we 2011/ 622 dated 09-03-2011 was
implemented and circulated after consultation with the
union, in the meeting held on 20-02-2011. The Nigam is
under an obligation to work out indoor medical facility
through insurance, which intention was reiterated in the
wage agreement singned by Delhi and Mumbai unit of the
union and the management,during the course of
conciliation proceedings. There was no stay against the
Nigam for handing over health insurance scheme to M/s.
United India Assurance Company Ltd. and releasing of
Rs. 45 crore to the insurance company. the CGHS scheme
was available to the employees till the insurance scheme
was not launched.
6. During pendency of adjudication process, an
application was moved by the Nigam, under section 33(2)
of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (in short the Act)
detailing therein that it has launched a scheme dated
10-03-2011 in comformity with the wage agreement dated
11-05-2010. Existing two years period, as per the said
insurance policy, is going to expire on 10-03-2012. Nigam
wants approval of their action of implementation of Health
Insurance Policy for 11-03-2012 and onwards under
section 33(1) of the said Act. The application so moved,
was registered as an industrial dispute.
7. Section 33 of the Act bars alteration in conditions
of service “prejudicial to the workman concerned in the
dispute and punishment of discharge of dismissal when
either is connected with pendentelite industrial dispute
“save with the permission of the authorities before which
the proceedings is pending” or where the discharge of
dismissal is for any misconduct not connected with the
pendentelite industrial dispute without the “approval of
such authority”.
Prohibition contained in Section 33 of the Act is
two fold. On one hand, they are designed to protect the
workman concerned during the course of industrial
conciliation, arbitration and adjudication, against
employers’s harassment and victimization, on account of
their having raised the industrial dispute or their
continuing the pending proceedings and on the other.,
they seek to maintain status quo by prescribing
management conduct which may give rise to “fresh
dispute” which further exacerbate the already strained
relations betweer I employer and the workman. Where
industrial disputes are pendentelite before an authority
mentioned in the section, it was thought necessary that
such disputes should be conciliated or adjudicated upon
by the authority in a peaceful atmosphere, undisturbed
by any subsequent causes for bitterness or
unpleasantness. To achieve this object, a ban has been
imposed upon the employer exercising his common law,
statutory or contractual right to terminate the services of
his employees according to contract or the provisions of
law governing such service. The ordinary right of the
employer to alter the terms of his employees' services to
their prejudice or to terminate their services under the
general law governing contract of employment, has been
banned subject to certain conditions. This ban, therefore,
is designed to restrict the interference of the general rights
and liabilities of the parties under the ordinary law within
the limits truly necessary for accomplishing the object of
those provisions. Anxiety to know about ban on the right
of the employer, persuades me to reproduce the provisions
of section 33 of the Act thus:
"33. Conditions of service, etc., to remain unchanged
under certain circumstances during pendency of
proceedings. -( 1) During the pendency of any
conciliation proceeding before a conciliation officer
or a Board or of any proceeding before an arbitrator
or a Labour Court or Tribunal or National Tribunal
in respect of an industrial dispute, no employer
shall.—
(a) in regard to any matter connected with the
dispute, alter, to the prejudice of the workmen
4158
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
concerned in such dispute, the conditions of service
applicable to them immediately before the
commencement of such proceeding; or
(b) for any misconduct connected with the dispute,
discharge or punish, whether by dismissal or
otherwise, any workman concerned in such dispute.
Save with the express permission in writing of the
authority before which the proceeding is pending.
(2) During the pendency of any such proceeding in
respect of an industrial dispute, the employer may,
in accordance with standing orders applicable to a
workman concerned in such dispute or, where there
are no such standing orders, in accordance with the
terms of the contract, whether express or implied,
between him and the workman-
(a) alter, in regard to any matter not connected with
the dispute, the conditions of service applicable to
that workman immediately before the commencement
of such proceeding; or
(b) for any misconduct not connected with the
dispute, discharge or punish, whether by dismissal
or otherwise, that workman:
Provided that no such workman shall be discharged
or dismissed, unless he has been paid wages for
one month and an application has been made by the
employer to the authority before which the
proceeding is pending for approval of the action
taken by the employer.
(3) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-
section (2), no employer shall, during the pendency
of any such proceeding in respect of an industrial
dispute, take any action against any protected
workman concerned in such dispute -
(a) by altering, to the prejudice of such protected
workman, the conditions of service applicable to
him immediately before the commencement of such
proceeding; or
(b) by discharging or punishing, whether any
dismissal or otherwise, such protected workman,
save with the express permission in writing of the
authority before which the proceeding is pending.
Explanation.—For the purposes of this sub-section,
a "protected workman", in relation to an
establishment, means a workman who, being a
member of the executive or other office bearer of a
registered trade union connected with the
establishment, is recognized as such in accordance
with rules made in this behalf.
(4) In every establishment, the number of workmen
to be recognized as protected workmen for the
purposes of sub-section (3) shall be one per cent of
the total number of workmen employed therein
subject to a minimum number of five protected
workmen and a maximum number of one hundred
protected workmen and for the aforesaid purpose,
the appropriate Government may make rules
providing for the distribution of such protected
workmen among various trade unions, if any,
connected with the establishment and the manner
in which the workmen may be chosen and recognized
as protected workmen.
(5) Where an employer makes an application to a
conciliation officer, Board, an arbitrator, a Labour
Court, Tribunal or National Tribunal under the
proviso to sub-section (2) for approval of the action
taken by him, the authority concerned shall, without
delay, hear such application and pass, within a period
of three months from the date of receipt of such
application, such order in relation thereto as it deems
fit.
Provided that where any such authority considers it
necessary or expedient so to do, it may, for reasons
to be recorded in writing, extend such period by
such further period as it may think fit.
Provided further that no proceedings before any
such authority shall lapse merely on the ground that
any period specified in this sub-section had expired
without such proceedings being completed.
8. As noted above sub-sections (1) and (2) are
designed for different purposes since sub-section (1)
applies to the proposition when the employer wants to
alter service conditions of the workman to his prejudice in
regard to any matter connected with the dispute or for any
misconduct connected with the dispute, in that situation
he is obliged to seek prior permission in writing of the
authority before whom the dispute is pending and in a
case where the employer wants to alter service conditions
of a workman in regard to a matter not connected with the
dispute or for any misconduct not connected with the
dispute, in that situation he is obliged to seek approval of
the order under sub-section (2) of the aforesaid section.
When an employer violates the provisions of sub-section
(1) or sub-section (2) of section 33 of the Act, an instant
remedy is provided to the workman by the provisions of
section 33A of the Act. In other words, where an employer
has contravened the provisions of section 33, the
aggrieved workman has been given the' option to make a
complaint in writing, to the authority before which an
industrial dispute is pending, with which the aggrieved
workman is concerned. The complaint of such
contravention can be made not to the adjudicating
authorities, but to the conciliatory authority also. If a
complaint is made to a conciliatory authority, viz. a
Conciliation Officer or a Board of Conciliation, clause (a)
of section 33 A of the act authorizes a Conciliation Officer
or the Board to take such complaint into account in
bringing about a settlement of the complained dispute.
The Conciliation Officer or the Board is not empowered to
adjudicate upon the dispute, which is the area of
adjudicatory authorities. When a complaint is made to
adjudicatory authority viz. Arbitrator, Labour Court,
Tribunal or National Tribunal, it will adjudicate upon the
dispute as if it is a dispute referred to or pending before it.
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4159
9. The application was withdrawn by the Nigam
claiming that there was no dispute for renewal of insurance
scheme with effect from 10-03-2013 with majority union
namely, MTNL Delhi Mazdoor Sangh.
10. What is the effect of non-moving an application
for approval? Such proposition was taken note of by the
Apex Court in Jaipur Zila Sehkari Bhoomi Vikas Bank (AIR
2002 S.C. 643) wherein it was held that it would be clear
case of contravention of the proviso to section 33(2)(b) of
the Act. It would be expedient to reproduce the law laid in
the above precedent, which are extracted thus:
‘‘The proviso to Section 33(2)(b) as can be seen
from its very unambiguous and clear language, is
mandatory. This apart from the object of Section 33
and in the context of the proviso to Section 33(2)(b),
it is obvious that the conditions contained in the
said proviso are to be essentially complied with.
Further any employer who contravenes the
provisions of Section 33 invites a punishment under
S. 31 (1) with imprisonment for a term which may
extend to six months or with fine which may extend
to Rs.1000 or with both. This penal provision is again
a pointer of the mandatory nature of the proviso to
comply with the conditions stated therein. To put it
in other way, the said conditions being mandatory,
are to be satisfied if an order of discharge or dismissal
passed under Section 33(2)(b) is to be operative, if
an employer desires to take benefit of the said
provision for passing an order of discharge or
dismissal of an employee, he has also to take the
burden of discharging the statutory obligation
placed on him in the said proviso. Taking a contrary
view that an order of discharge or dismissal passed
by an employer in contravention of the mandatory
conditions contained in the proviso does not render
such an order inoperative or void, defeats the very
purpose of the proviso and it becomes meaningless.
It is well settled rule of interpretation that no part of
statute shall be construed as unnecessary or
superfluous. The proviso cannot be diluted or
disobeyed by an employer. He cannot disobey the
mandatory provision and then say that the order of
discharge or dismissal made in contravention of
Section 33(2)(b) is not void or in-perative. He cannot
be permitted to take advantage of his own wrong.
The interpretation of statute must be such that it
should advance the legislative intent and serve the
purpose for which it is made rather than to frustrate
it. The proviso to Section 33(2)(b) affords protection
to a workman to safeguard his interest and it is a
shield against victimization and unfair labour
practice by the employer during the pendency of
industrial dispute when the relationship between
them are already strained. An employer cannot be
permitted to use the provision of Section 33(2)(b) to
ease out a workman without complying with the
conditions contained in the said proviso for any
alleged misconduct said to be unconnected with
the already pending industrial dispute. The
protection afforded to a workman under the said
provision cannot be taken away. If it is to be held
that an order of discharge or dismissal passed by
the employer without complying with the
requirements of the said proviso is not void or
inoperative, the employer may with impunity
discharge or dismiss a workman.
11. The Apex Court dealt with the situation of the
withdrawal of such approval application or not making an
application in the following manner:
‘‘The view that when no application is made or the
one made is withdrawn, there is no order of refusal
of such application on merit and as such the order
of dismissal or discharge does not become void or
inoperative unless such an order is set aside under
Section 33A, cannot be accepted. In our view, not
making an application under Section 33(2) (b)
seeking approval or withdrawing an application
once made before any order is made thereon, is a
clear case of contravention of the proviso to Section
33(2)(b). An employer who does not make an
application under Section 33(2)(b) or withdraws that
one made, cannot be rewarded by relieving him of
the statutory obligation created on him to make such
an application. If it is so done, he will be happier or
more comfortable than an employer who obeys the
command of law and makes an application inviting
scrutiny of the authority in the matter of granting
approval of the action taken by him. Adherence to
and obedience of law should be obvious and
necessary in a system governed by rule of law. An
employer by design can avoid to make an application
after dismissing or discharging an employee or file it
and withdraw before any order is passed on it, on its
merits, to take a position that such order is not
inoperative or till it is set aside under Section 33A
notwithstanding the contravention of Section
33(2)(b) proviso, driving the employee to have
recourse to one or more proceeding by making a
complaint under Section 33A or to raise another
industrial dispute or to make a complaint under
Section 31(1). Such an approach destroys the
protection specifically and expressly given to an
employee under the said proviso as against possible
victimization, unfair labour practice or harassment
because of pendency of industrial dispute so that
an employee can be saved from hardship of
unemployment.
12. In view of above legal proposition it is announced
that the Nigam would be faced with the consequences of
withdrawal of the application, referred above, in case
provisions of section 33 of the Act is violated by it. An
award is accordingly passed. It be sent to the appropriate
Government for publication.
Dated : 21-3-2013
Dr. R. K. YADAV, Presiding Officer
4160
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ubZ fnYyh] 5 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1579-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj nf{k.k iwoZ jsyos
ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 54@98)
dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 27&06&2013 dks
izkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹iQk- la- ,y&41012@148@97&vkbZ vkj (ch&I)º
lqefr ldykuh] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 5th July, 2013
S. O. 1579.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 54/98)
of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial
Dispute between the management of S. E. Railway and
their workmen, received by the Central Government on
27-06-2013.
[ F. No. L-41012/148/97-IR (B-I)]
SUMATI SAKLANI, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT,
JABALPUR
No. CGIT/LC/R/54/98
Presiding Officer : SHRI R. B. PATLE
Shri N.Vasu,
Wagon Repairing Shop,
S.E. Rly., W.R.S. Colony,
Raipur
... Workman
Versus
Sr. Divisional Personnel Officer (Admn.),
S.E. Rly., Bilaspur ... Management
AWARD
Passed on this 14th day of May, 2013
1. As per letter dated 9-3-98 by the Government of
India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is
received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under
section 10 of I.D. Act, 1947 as per Notification No. L-41012/
148/97-IR (B-I). The dispute under reference relates to :
‘‘Whether the action of the management of Senior
Divisional Personnel Officer (Admn.) Bilaspur, South
Eastern Railway, in relation to their Wagon Repairing
Workshop in terminating the services of Shri N.Vasu,
Ex-Peon with effect from 10-11-95 is legal and
justified? If not, to what relief the workman is
entitled?’’
2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to
the parties. 1st party workman submitted his statement of
claim. The case of 1st party workman is that he was
appointed as Bunglow Peon w.e.f. 27-4-95. His services
were terminated from10-11-95. His work was satisfactory.
There was no complaint about him. His services were
terminated without notice. He had continuously worked
for more than 240 days without any break. Termination of
his service is in violation of Section 25-F, G, H & N of I.D.
Act. The termination of service is illegal. On such
contention workman prays for his reinstatement with
consequential benefits.
3. IInd party management filed Written Statement
opposing claim of workman. It is not disputed that
applicant workman was appointed from 28-4-95 as Bunglow
Peon. After retirement of Shri S.V.L.N.Chari i.e. after 6
months, 12 days of service, his services were terminated
from 10-11-95 as officer to whom he was attached has
retired on 31-10-95. That as per policy letter dated 31-5-95,
the substitute/casual Bunglow peon not completed one
year service. His services are required to be terminated. In
pursuance of said policy decision, the services of 1st party
workman were terminated. All other allegation of workman
are denied. It is denied that workman has completed 240
days continuous service. It is denied that the termination
of 1st party workman is in violation of Section 25-F, G, H &
N of I.D. Act. He has prayed that relief prayed by workman
be rejected.
4. Considering pleadings on record, the points which
arise for my consideration and determination are as under.
My findings are recorded against each of them for the
reasons as below :—
(i) Whether the termination of
In Affirmative
services of 1st party workman
Shri N. Vasu, Ex-Peon with
effect from 10-11-95 is legal?
(ii) If so, to what relief the Relief prayed by
workman is entitled to?”
workman isrejected.
REASONS
5. Though 1st party workman in his statement of
claim submits that he has completed 240 days continuous
service, he has not adduced any evidence.
6. Management's witness filed affidavit of evidence
covering all the points in Written Statement filed by the
IInd party/management. The witness of the management
is not cross-examined as the workman remained absent.
The evidence of management's witness remained
unchallenged. The witness of the management has stated
that 1st party workman was working only for 6 months 12
days. He was not working continuously for 240 days. In
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4161
view of unchallenged evidence of management's witness,
the workman is not covered under Section 25(b) of I.D.Act.
The provisions. The workman is not entitled to protection
of Section 25-F, G, H & N of I.D.Act. Therefore action of
management in terminating the services cannot be said.
illegal. For above reasons, I record my finding in Point
No.1 in Affirmative.
7. In the result, award is passed as under :—
(1) Action of the IInd party management in
terminating the services of Shri N. Vasu, Ex.-Peon
with effect from 10-11-95 is legal.
(2) Relief prayed by workman is rejected.
R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 5 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1580-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ ,l lh
lh ,y ds çca/ra=k ds laca¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds
chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 46@2013)
dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 5&7&2013 dks çkIr
gqvk Fkk A
¹iQk- la- ,y&22012@10@2013&vkbZ vkj (lh,e&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 5th July, 2013
S.O. 1580.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 46/2013)
of the Central Government Indus. Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure in the
Industrial Dispute between the management of M/s.
Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd. and their workmen, which was
received by the Central Government on 5-7-2013.
[ F. No. L- 22012/10/2013-IR (CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT
AT HYDERABAD
Present : Smt. M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer
Dated the 28th day of May, 2013
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 46/2013
Between:
The President,
(Sri R. Kashiramulu),
Telengana Trade Union Council,
H.No.3-5-247/3, Azmathpura,
Karimnagar Dist.,
Karimnagar.
. . . .Petitioner
AND
The General Manager,
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
Bhupalapally Area, Bhupalapally,
Warangal Dist.-506169. . . . .Respondent
Appearances:
For the Petitioner : M/s. A. Sarojana & K. Vasudeva Reddy,
Advocates
For the Respondent : None
AWARD
The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its order
No. L-220l2/l0/2013-IR(CM-II) dated 3-4-2013 referred the
following dispute under Section l0(l)(d) of the I,D. Act,
1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal between the
management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
and their workman. The reference is,
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the Chief General Manager,
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Bhupalapalli
Area, Warangal Dist., in terminating the services of
Sri APCH Venkateshwar Rao, Ex-Coal Filler, KTK-1
incline, SCCo. Ltd., Bhupalpalli Area, Warangal
Distt., with effect from 26-8-2009 is justified or not?
To what relief the applicant is entitled for?"
The reference is numbered in this Tribunal as I.D.
No. 46/2013 and notices are yet to be issued to the parties
concerned.
2. The case is posted for appearance of parties to
13-6-2013. While things stood so, Sri K. Vasudeva Reddy,
Advocate filed Vakalat for the Petitioner together with
a petition i.e., I.A No.76/2013 invoking Sec. 36(4) of
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 seeking for permission to
appear for the Petitioner. Further he filed I. A. No. 78/2013
seeking for advancement of the case to 28-5-2013 and filed
a memo seeking for permission to withdraw the case. In the
given circumstances, IA No.76/2013 and IA No.78/2013 are
allowed. Sri K. Vasudeva Reddy, Advocate is permitted to
represent the Petitioner.
3. In pursuance of the order in IA No.78/2013 dated
28-5-2013, this case is advanced to 28-5-2013. In the memo
filed by the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner, seeking for
permission to withdraw the petition, Petitioner pleaded that
the management was kind enough to offer employment to
him subject to withdrawal of the present dispute and that
he is to be permitted to withdraw the petition. Notice given
to other side. Heard both parties. Petitioner is permitted to
withdraw his case. In the result, the case is dismissed as
withdrawn.
4162
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Award passed accordingly. Transmit.
Dictated to Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant
transcribed by her and corrected by me on this the 28th
day of May, 2013.
M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer
Appendix of evidence
Witnesses examined for the Petitioner NIL
Witnesses examined for the Respondent NIL
Documents marked for the Petitioner
NIL
Documents marked for the Respondent
NIL
ubZ fnYyh] 5 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1581-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ ,l lh
lh ,y ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds
chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 45@2013)
dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 2&7&2013 dks çkIr
gqvk Fkk A
¹iQk- la- ,y&22012@5@2013&vkbZ vkj (lh,e&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 5th July, 2013
S.O. 1581.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 45/2013)
of the Central Govt. Indus. Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,
Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial
Dispute between the management of M/s.Singareni
Collieries Co. Ltd. and their workmen, which was received
by the Central Government on 5-7-2013.
[ F. No. L- 22012/5/2013-IR (CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT
AT HYDERABAD
Present : Smt. M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer
Dated the 28th day of May, 2013
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 45/2013
Between:
The President,
(Sri R. Kashiramulu),
Telengana Trade Union Council,
H.No.3-5-247/3, Azmathpura,
Karimnagar Dist.,
Karimnagar. .. ..Petitioner
AND
The General Manager,
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
Bhupalapally Area, Bhupalapally,
Warangal Dist.-506169.
. ...Respondent
Appearances :
For the Petitioner : M/s. A. Sarojana & K. Vasudeva Reddy,
Advocates
For the Respondent : None
AWARD
The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its
order No. L-22012/5/2013- IR(CM-II) dated 3-4-2013 referred
the following dispute under Section l0(1)(d) of the
I.D. Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal between the
management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
and their workman. The reference is,
SCHEDULE
‘‘Whether the action of the Chief General Manager,
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Bhupalapalli
Area, Warangal Dist., in terminating the services of
Sri Chenigarapu Venu @Shenigarapu Venu, Ex-Badli
Filler, KTK-6 incline, Bhupalpalli Area, Warangal
Distt., with effect from 13-10-2008 is justified or not?
If not, to what relief the applicant is entitled for?’’
The reference is numbered in this Tribunal as I.D.
No.45/2013 and notices are yet to be issued to the parties
concerned.
2. The case is posted for appearance of parties to
13-6-2013. While things stood so, Sri K. Vasudeva Reddy,
Advocate filed Vakalat for the Petitioner together with a
petition i.e., IA No.77/2013 invoking Sec.36(4) of Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 seeking for permission to appear for
the Petitioner. Further he filed I.A.No.75/2013, seeking for
advancement of the case to 28-5-2013 and filed a memo
seeking for permission to withdraw the case. In the given
circumstances, IA No.77/2013 and IA No.75/2013 are
allowed. Sri K. Vasudeva Reddy, Advocate is pennitted to
represent the Petitioner.
3. In pursuance of the order in IA No. 75/2013 dated
28-5-2013, this case is advanced to 28-5-2013. In the memo
filed by the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner, seeking for
permission to withdraw the petition, Petitioner pleaded that
the management was kind enough to offer employment to
him subject to withdrawal of the present dispute and that
he is to be permitted to withdraw the petition. Notice given
to other side. Heard both parties. Petitioner is permitted to
withdraw his case. In the result, the case is dismissed as
withdrawn.
Award passed accordingly. Transmit.
Dictated to Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant
transcribed by her and corrected by me on this the 28th
day of May, 2013.
M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4163
Appendix of evidence
Witnesses examined for the Petitioner NIL
Witnesses examined for the Respondent NIL
Documents marked for the Petitioner
NIL
Documents marked for the Respondent
NIL
ubZ fnYyh] 5 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1582-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ ,l lh
lh ,y ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds
chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky; gSnjkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 12@2012)
dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 5&7&2013 dks çkIr
gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y&22012@8@2012&vkbZ vkj (lh,e&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 5th July, 2013
S.O. 1582.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 12/2012)
of the Cent. Govt. Indus. Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,
Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial
Dispute between the management of M/s. Singareni
Collieries Co. Ltd. and their workmen, received by the
Central Government on 5-7-2013.
[ No. L- 22012/8/2012-IR (CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT
AT HYDERABAD
Present : Smt. M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer
Dated the 26th April, 2013
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 12/2012
Between:
The General Secretary (Riaz Ahmed),
Singareni Miners & Engg. Workers Union (HMS)
Qtr. No.C-34, Sector-I, Godavarikhani,
Karimnagar(AP) - 505209. ...Petitioner/Union
AND
The Chief General Manager,
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
Bhupalapally Area, Bhupalapally,
Adilabad Dist.-504303. . . . .Respondent
Appearances :
For the Petitioner : M/s. A. Sarojana & K. Vasudeva Reddy,
Advocates
For the Respondent : None
AWARD
The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its
Order No. L-22012/8/2012-IR(CM-II) dated 28-3-2012
referred the following dispute under Section 10(l)(d) of the
I.D. Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal between the
management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
and their workman represented by the General Secretary,
Singareni Miners & Engg. Workers Union (HMS). The
reference is,
SCHEDULE
‘‘Whether the action of the General Manager,
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Bhupalapalli
Area, in terminating the services of Sri Bejjanki
Mahender, Ex-Coal Filler, KTK-2 Incline, Bhupalapalli
Area with effect from 5-9-2007 is fair and justified?
To what relief the concerned workman is entitled?"
The reference is numbered in this Tribunal as I.D.
No. 12/2012 and notices were issued to the parties
concerned.
2. The case stands for filing of claim statement and
documents by the Petitioner to 15-5-2013. Petitioner filed
IA No. 38/2013 on 15-4-2013 seeking for advancement of
the case to 15.4.2013 and filed a memo seeking for
permission to withdraw the case.
3. In pursuance of the order in IA No.38/2013 dated
26-4-2013, this case is advanced to 26-4-2013. In the memo
filed by the Petitioner seeking for permission to withdraw
the case, Petitioner pleaded that the management was kind
enough to offer employment to him subject to withdrawal
of the present dispute and that he be permitted to withdraw
the petition.
4. Notice given to Respondent. Heard both parties.
Petitioner is permitted to withdraw his case.
5. In the result, the case is dismissed as withdrawn.
Award is passed accordingly.
Transmit.
Dictated to Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant
transcribed by her and corrected by me on this the 26th
day of April, 2013.
M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer
Appendix of evidence
Witnesses examined for the Petitioner NIL
Witnesses examined for the Respondent NIL
Documents marked for the Petitioner
NIL
Documents marked for the Respondent
NIL
4164
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ubZ fnYyh] 8 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1583-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ LesYVj
IykUV ukydks vuqxqy mMhlk ds çca/ra=k ds laca¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj
muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa
dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky; Hkqous'oj ds
iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 2@2013) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh;
ljdkj dks 3&7&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹iQk- la- ,y&43012@2@2012&vkbZ vkj (,e)º
tksgu rksiuks] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 8th July, 2013
S.O. 1583.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the common Award (Ref.
No. 2/2013) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/
Labour Court, Bhubaneswar now as shown in the
Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers
in relation to the management of Smelter Plant, NALCO,
Angul, Odisha and their workman, which was received by
the Central Government on 3-7-2013.
[F. No. L- 43012/2/2012-IR (M)]
JOHAN TOPNO, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL
TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT
BHUBANESWAR
Present :
Shri J. Srivastava,
Presiding Officer,
C.G..I.T.-Cum-Labour Court, Bhubaneswar.
Industrial Dispute Case No. 2/2013
Date of Passing order 28th May, 2013
Between :
The General Manager,
Smelter Plant, NALCO,
P.O. & Dist. Angul, (Odisha)
.....1st Party Management
(And)
Shri Mohan Behera,
Qr. No. A/229, NALCO Nagar,
PO. Nalco Nagar, Dist. Angul-759145
.....2nd Party-Workman
Appearances :
None
For the 1st Party-Managements.
None
For the 2nd Party Workman.
ORDER
Case taken up. None is present for the 1st Party-
Management. The 2nd Party-workman is present is person
and moves a petition for withdrawal of the case. The 1st
Party-Management has not put in appearance as yet.
2. It has been stated in the withdrawal application
that the matter of reinstatement in service has almost been
settled by the National Commissioner of Scheduled Caste,
but the Management has imposed a condition that first the
workman should withdraw the case pending in the CGIT,
Bhubaneswar. Accordingly this withdrawal petition has
been moved.
3. Since the 2nd party-workman is voluntarily
withdrawing his case before this Tribunal there is no
impediment in allowing his petition. He is accordingly
permitted to withdraw the case and a no dispute award is
passed in the case.
Dictated & Corrected by me.
J. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 8 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1584-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ ,p Mh
,iQ lh LVsUMj ykbiQ bUL;ksjsa'k d- fyfeVsM jk;iqj ds çca/ra=k ds
laca¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/ esa fu£n"V
vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;
tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 28@2007) çdkf'kr djrh gS tks
dsUæh; ljdkj dks 2&7&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹iQk- la- ,y&17012@20@2006&vkbZ vkj (,e)º
tksgu rksiuks] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 8th July, 2013
S.O. 1584.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the common Award (Ref.
No. 28/2007) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal/Labour Court, Jabalpur now as shown in the
Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers
in relation to the management of M/s. HDFC Standard Life
Insurance Co. Ltd., Raipur and their workman, which was
received by the Central Government on 2-7-2013.
[F. No. L- 17012/20/2006-IR (M)]
JOHAN TOPNO, Under Secy.
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4165
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR
COURT, JABALPUR
No. CGIT/LC/R/28/07
Presiding Officer : Shri R. B. Patle
Smt. Dolly Ghoshal,
W/o Shri Amit Ghoshal,
B/11, Maruthi Residency,
Amlidhi, Raipur (CG)- 492001 ....Workman
Versus
The Chief Executive Officer,
HDFC Standard Life Insurance Co.Ltd.,
IInd Floor, A Wing, Trade Star Building,
Junction of Kondfivita & MV Road,
Andheri Kurla Road,
East Mumbai
The Resident Manager,
HDFC Standard Insurance Co.Ltd.,
1st Floor, Vanijya Bhawan,
Devendarnagar Road, Sainagar,
Raipur ....Management
AWARD
Passed on this 7th day of June, 2013
1.
As per letter dated 13-2-2007 by the Government of
India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is
received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under
Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.L-17012/
20/2006-IR(M) . The dispute under reference relates to:
“1. Whether Smt. Dolly Ghoshal, Officer Operation,
HDFC Standard Insurance Co.Ltd. is a workman by
the nature of job performed by her and if so,
2. Whether the action of the management of HDFC
Standard insurance Co. Ltd in dismissing Smt. Dolly
Ghoshal, Officer Operation from her services without
following the principles of natural justice and not
conducting a domestic enquiry into the allegations
is justified? If not, to what relief she is entitled?”
2.
After receiving, reference, notices were issued to
the parties. 1st party workman despite of notice, failed to
submit Statement of Claim. Exparte order is passed against
workman on 17-3-2011.
3.
The IInd party management submitted Written
Statement on 8-7-2010. It is submitted by management that
it is engaged in Insurance Business. 1st party Dolly
Ghoshal was employed as Officer (Operations) and the
reference is not tenable as Smt. Dolly Ghoshal was
appointed in Company as Officer Operation. The job profile
of the officer operation are shown in the Written Statement
filed by the management. She was appointed on salary of
Rs. 9025 Therefore she is not workman under Section 2(S)
of I.D.Act. It is further submitted that workman was working
with the management of Ilnd party and it was found that
she was indulged in misappropriation of money. Her
explanation was called on 4-1-06. The reply was received
on 9-1-06. The management had investigated the
allegations and found Miss Dolly Ghoshal has indulged in
acts of dishonesty and gross violation in connection with
employer’s business and therefore she was dismissed from
services of the company. However 1st party Dolly had
requested for relieving letter by company. Her request was
accepted and she was given a relieving letter inspite of
being dismissed on humanitarian ground. That Miss Dolly
Ghoshal tried to create undue pressure on the management
making false allegations. IInd party management prays for
rejection of the demands under reference.
4.
Considering pleadings on record, the points which
arise for my consideration and determination are as under.
My findings are recorded against each of them for the
reasons as below :—
(i) Whether Smt. Dolly Ghoshal,
In Affirmative
Officer Operation, HDFC Standard
Insurance Co.Ltd. is a workman
under Section 2(S) of I.D. Act and
reference is tenable.
(ii) Whether the action of the
In Affirmative
management of HDFC Standard
insurance Co. Ltd in dismissing
Smt. Dolly Ghoshal, Officer
Operation from her services is legal?
(iii) If not, what relief the workman
Relief prayed
is entitled to?”
by workman
is rejected.
REASONS
5.
Though dismissal from service is challenged by
1st party, she has failed to submit statement of claim or
adduced evidence. 1st party is proceeded exparte. IInd
party in its Written Statement has contended that Dolly
Ghoshal is not covered as workman under Section 2( s) of
I.D.Act. The job profile of Dolly Ghoshal are given in
para-3 of the Written Statement. The duties includes
Scrutiny of Life Insurance Proposal form, processing the
proposal form if deemed fit, accept cash DD and cheque
from customers against proposal form, Maintaining the
DSR and Score Card, agency related work, Petty Cash
related work etc. The job profile of Miss Dolly Ghoshal
would not be taken out as workman defined under
Section 2(s) of I.D.Act. For above reasons, I hold that
Miss Dolly Ghoshal is covered as workman and reference
is tenable. Accordingly I record my finding in Point No.1 in
Affirmative.
6.
Point No.2—1st party workman is challenging
dismissal from service. However she has not filed statement
of claim, she has not adduced any evidence, evidence
adduced by management’s witness Neeraj pandey show
that Miss Dolly Ghoshal was involved in act of
misappropriation of some amount, notice was given to her,
4166
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
reply was received and the allegation were inquired into.
The evidence of the management’s witness remained
unchallenged as 1st party did not cross-examined said
witness. Thus there is absolutely no pleadings or evidence
on behalf of 1st party to establish that dismissal of
Miss Dolly Ghoshal is illegal. Therefore the action of the
management of Ilnd party management cannot be said illegal.
For above reasons, I record my answer in Affirmative.
7.
In the result, award is passed as under :—
(1) 1st party Miss Dolly Ghoshal is a workman. Action of
the dismissal of Miss Dolly Ghoshal by management
of IInd party is legal.
(2) Reliefs prayed by 1st party Miss Dolly Ghoshal are
rejected.
R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 8 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1585-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bLVuZ
feujYl Vsª¯Mx ,tsUlh] tcyiqj ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa
vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa
dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds
iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 93@2007) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh;
ljdkj dks 2&7&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y&29011@12@1997&vkbZ vkj (,e)º
tksgu rksiuks] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 8th July, 2013
S.O. 1585.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the common award (Ref.
No. 93/2007) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal/Labour Court, Jabalpur now as shown in the
Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers
in relation to the management of M/s. Eastern Minerals
Trading Agency, Jabalpur and their workman, which was
received by the Central Government on 2-7-2013.
[No. L- 29011/12/1997-IR (M)]
JOHAN TOPNO, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
JABALPUR
No. CGIT/LC/R/93/07
Presiding Officer : Shri R. B. Patle
The President,
Ispat Khadan Janta Mazdoor Union,
20, Savarkar Ward, New Basti,
Distt. Jabalpur
....Workman
Versus
M/s Eastern Minerals Trading Agency,
Kuteshwar Stone Mines, Gortalai (Barhi),
Katni, Distt. Jabalpur ....Management
AWARD
Passed on this 6th day of June, 2013
1.
As per letter dated 14-9-07 by the Government of
India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is
received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under
Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.L-29011/
12/1997-IR(M). The dispute under reference relates to:
“ Whether the issues raised by Ispapt Khadan Janata
Mazdoor Union in their charger of demands on following
items viz:-
(i) Non-maintenance of record of 60 employees.
(ii) Dust Allowance of Rs.15 per month,
(iii) Maintenance of overtime records by the
management,
(iv) Grant of Medical Facilities to the employees and
(v) Cancellation of transfer of the 24 workman to Asansol
headquarters are just and legal?
If so, to what relief the workmen are entitled to?”
2.
1st party Union is challenging 5 demands in the
dispute under reference. Even after issuing notices, the
Union has not participated in the proceeding, no statement
of claim is filed. 1st party is proceeded exparte on
11-5-2011.
3.
IInd party management also not filed Written
Statement. From conduct of the 1st party, it is clear that the
parties are not pursuing or participating in the dispute.
4.
In the result, award is passed as under:—
“Reference is disposed off as No Dispute Award.”
R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 8 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1586-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ Mk;e.M
lhesaV~l fojykiqj] tcyiqj ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj
muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa
dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds
iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 235@1998) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh;
ljdkj dks 2-7-2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y&29012@99@1998&vkbZ vkj (,e)º
tksgu rksiuks] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 8th July, 2013
S.O. 1586.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the common award (Ref.
No. 235/1998) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal/Labour Court, Jabalpur now as shown in the
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4167
Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers
in relation to the management of M/s. Diamond Cement,
Birlapur, Jabalpur, and their workman, which was received
by the Central Government on 2-7-2013.
[No. L- 29012/99/1998-IR (M)]
JOHAN TOPNO, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
JABALPUR
No. CGIT/LC/R/235/98
Presiding Officer : Shri R. B. Patle
The Vice President,
Khadan Mazdoor Union,
Head Office, Shram Sadhna,
West Land, Ordanance Factory,
Katni, Jabalpur
....Workman/Union
Versus
The President,
M/s. Diamond Cement,
Birlapur, PO Narsingarh,
Damoh, Jabalpur
...Management
AWARD
Passed on this 11th day of April, 2013
As per letter dated 28-10-98 by the Government of
India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is
received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under
Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.
L-290 12/99/98-IR(M). The dispute under reference relates
to:
“Whether the action of the management of
M/s. Diamond Cements in transferring Shri G
Paramanandam to the unit at Ammasandra in
Karnataka and subsequent termination of his services
by Ammasandra Unit of Diamond Cements Ltd is
justified? If not, to what relief the workman is
entitled?”
2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to
the parties. 1st party workman did not file his statement of
claim. The reference proceeded exparte against workman
on 16-12-2005.
3. Management filed exparte Written Statement. IInd
party management contented that statement of claim as
per Rule 10(B) of I.D.Act is not filed by 1st party workman.
Exparte order has been passed. The management was
directed to file Written Statement. That 1st party workman
was appointed as worker in 1982. As per clause-6 of
appointment order, services of 1st party workman are
transferable to any establishment of the company anywhere
in India depending upon the exigencies of work. That the
services of workman are covered by standing orders, Rules
and Regulations in force from time to time with regard to
work, attendance, conduct and discipline. That IInd party
runs Cement Factories at different places. One in
Ammasandra, Distt. Tumkur in Karnataka State, another at
Narsingarh, District, Damoh in Madhya Pradesh and the
third at Madora, Jhansi in Uttar Pradesh.
4. That after appointment of 1st party, his performance
was not satisfactory. Letter No. 6497 dated 4-6-84 was
received about his careless performance. Another letter
No. 613 dated 27-8-84 was issued for the act subversive of
discipline. 3rd letter No. 2722 dated 24-4-85 was issued
against refusal to obey the lawful orders of his superiors.
During next 9 years, there was no grievance of his duties
and 1st party workman was transferred for administrative
exigencies as per order dated 30-12-94 to Ammasandra Unit.
He was relieved on 10-1-95. However workman did not join
new place of his posting. The management cannot be called
upon to pay wages by keeping him simple idle. His services
needs to be utilized wherever required and the workman
did not report to the place of his transfer. Chief Personal
Manager vide D.O .Letter No. 20552 dated 21-2-95 are
Sr. Manager IR, whether the transfer order dated 30-12-94
is alive. Reply was received to said letter as per letter dated
1-3-95 that the transfer of Mr. G.Parmanandam was alive.
He was relieved on 10-1-95. Chief Personal Manager has
also written letter on 11-3-95 passing orders that in view of
this voluntarily left and abandoned the company’s service,
his services were terminated from 11-3-95. That the transfer
has not changed his nature of job or service condition, pay
scale, status etc. the workman failed to report to duty to
the place he was transferred.
5. The workman fully aggrieved filed proceeding
before the ALC(C), Jabalpur and reference has been made.
It is submitted that transfer is the administrative prerogative
of the management. Writ Petition No. 3895/95 was filed by
the workman at High Court at Jabalpur. The said petition
was dismissed on 26-2-96 only with the direction to the
management to allow the wards of the workman to retain
the residential quarter till the examinations were over. That
the examination of his children was over by 27-3-96.
However the quarter was not vacated as per directions of
the Hon’ble High Court. The management has no option
but to file a Civil Suit before the Chief Judicial Magistrate
Damoh under Section 630 of the Companies Act for vacation
of the quarters. That in 1999, workman approached the
management for full and final settlement of his
account.Accordingly his PF and pension fund
accumulation were released as per letter No. 2411 dated
21-7-99. That workman is paid Rs.24548 vide cheque No.
731044 dated 8-9-99 towards gratuity. The services of the
1st party workman are terminated as he voluntarily left his
service. On such contentions, IInd party prayed for
rejection of the relief prayed by the workman.
4168
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
6. Considering pleadings on record, the points which
arise for my consideration and determination are as under.
My findings are recorded against each of them for the
reasons as below:—
(i)
Whether the action of the
management of M/s
In Affirmative
Diamond Cements in
transferring Shri G.
Paramanandam to the unit
at Ammasandra in
Kamataka and subsequent
termination of his services by
Ammasandra Unit of Diamond
Cements Ltd is justified?
(ii) If so, to what relief the
Reliefs prayed by
workman is entitled to?”
workman
are
rejected.
REASONS
7. 1st party workman challenged order of his transfer
dated 30-12-94 to Ammasandra Unit in Karnataka and
termination of services dated 11-3-95. 1st party workman
had not submitted his statement of claim. The management
filed Written Statement contending that the services of
workman are transferable to the units anywhere in India as
per clause-6 in the Appointment Order. Copy of the
appointment order is produced on record as Annexure
M-l. That workman did not join to the place of his transfer
despite he was relieved. Consequently his services were
terminated. The evidence of management’s witness
Shri R.S.Shekawat remained unchallenged. The services of
the workman are terminated as voluntarily abandoned his
services. That the 1st party workman had approached to
the Hon’ble High Court and he was paid amount of gratuity
in the year 1999. In view of unchallenged evidence on the
above point, the action of IInd party management cannot
be said illegal. For above reasons, I record my finding in
Point No.1 in Affirmative.
8. In the result, award is passed as under;—
(1)The action of theIInd party management in
transferring the 1st party workman Shri G.
Paramanandam to the unit at Ammasandra in
Karnataka and subsequent termination of his
services by Ammasandra Unit of Diamond Cements
Ltd. is legal.
(2) Relief prayed by workman are rejected.
R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 10 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1587-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bf.M;u
C;wjks vkWiQ ekbUl ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds
deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh;
ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] t;iqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ
la[;k 84@2005) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks
10&7&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y&42012@190@2004&vkbZ vkj (lh,e&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 10th July, 2013
S.O. 1587.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 84/2005) of
the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Jaipur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial
dispute between the management of Indian Bureau of
Mines, and their workmen, received by the Central
Government
on
10-7-2013.
[No. L- 42012/190/2004-IR (CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
vuqcU/
dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;]
t;iqj
lh-th-vkbZ-Vh-izdj.k la- 84@2005
Jh ,u-ds- iqjksfgr] ihBklhu vf/dkjh
jsiQjsUl ua- ,y&42012@190@2004&IR(CM-II) fnukad 2&8&2005
Sh. Durgalal S/o Sukhalal,
Back Side of R.C. Church, Opp. Dev Narain Mandir,
Flat No. 106, Parvatpura,
Ajmer (Rajasthan)
V/s.
The Controller of Mines,
Indian Bureau of Mines,
B-9, Tie. B.M. Colony, Balupura Road, Adarsh Nagar,
Ajmer (Rajasthan)
izkFkhZ dh rjiQ ls
% Jh vkj-lh-tSu
vizkFkhZ dh rjiQ ls % Jh dq.kky jkor
% iapkV %
fnukad 8&3&2013
1- dsUæh; ljdkj ds }kjk fuEu fookn vkS|ksfxd fookn
vf/fu;e] 1947 dh /kjk 10 dh mi&/kjk ds [k.M (?k) ds
izko/kuksa ds vUrxZr mDr vkns'k fnukad 2&8&2005 ds }kjk
U;k;fu.kZ;u gsrq izsf"kr fd;k x;k Fkk %
^^D;k [kku fu;a=kd] Hkkjrh; [kku C;wjks ch&9] VkbZ-ch-,e-
dkWyksuh] ckywiqj jksM] vknZ'k uxj] vtesj ds }kjk vius deZdkj
Jh nqxkZyky iq=k Jh [kq'kkyky dks fnukad 22&12&97 ls lsok ls
c[kkZLr djuk mfpr ,oa oS/ gS\ ;fn ugha rks deZdkj vius
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4169
fu;kstd ls fdl jkgr dks ikus dk vf/dkjh gS \**
2- LVsVeSUV vkWiQ Dyse esa izkFkhZ ds vfHkopu gS fd o"kZ
1990&91 esa 6 ekg rd nSfud osru Hkksxh vdq'ky deZpkjh ds
:i esa vizkFkhZ mÙkjkapy dk;kZy;] vtesj] esa pkSdhnkj ds in ij
inLFkkfir ,oa lsokjr jgk gSA blds vfrfjDr o"kZ 1996 ls 98 esa
v;Ld izlk/u iz;ksx'kkyk] vtesj esa Hk.Mkj 'kk[kk esa pkSdhnkj
ds in ij dk;Zjr jgk gSA izkFkhZ us o"kZ 1990&99 dh vof/ esa ,d
o"kZ esa 240 fnu ls vf/d fnu dk;Z fd;k gS] ysfdu vizkFkhZ }kjk
vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e dh /kjk 25 F ds vkns'kkRed izko/kuksa
dh ikyuk fd, fcuk mls lsok ls gVk fn;k x;kA izkFkhZ ds ;g Hkh
vfHkopu gS fd mls lsok ls gVk, tkus ds ckn fnukad 20&12&2000
dks og ^^iQhYM vnZyh** ds in ds fy, lk{kkRdkj ds fy,
mifLFkr gqvk] ysfdu mls volj u nsdj vizkFkhZ foHkkx ds nwljs
O;fDr dks lsok esa j[k fy;kA bl izdkj vizkFkhZ us vkS|ksfxd fookn
vf/fu;e dh /kjk 25 H dk Hkh mYya?ku fd;k gSA izkFkhZ us fnukad
12-12-97 dks mls lsok ls c[kkZLr fd, tkus ds vkns'k dks voS/
?kksf"kr dj lsok esa iqu% cgky djus rFkk mDr fnol ls cdk;k
osru e; vU; ykHk fnyokus gsrq izkFkZuk dh gSA
3- vizkFkhZ ds tokc esa izkDdFku gS fd izkFkhZ us dHkh Hkh
pkSdhnkj ds in ij dk;Z ugha fd;k] blfy, mls lsok ls gVkus dk
loky gh ugha mBrkA vizkFkhZ us bu rF;ksa dks Hkh badkj fd;k gS fd
izkFkhZ us vizkFkhZ ds ;gk 240 fnu ls vf/d dk;Z fd;k gS rFkk
vizkFkhZ ds ;gka fu;ksftr deZpkjh jgk gSA vizkFkhZ ds ;g Hkh
izkDdFku gS fd /kjk 25(F) ,oa (H) dk dksbZ mYya?ku ugha gqvk gS]
blfy, LVsVeSaV vkWiQ Dyse fujLr fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA
4- izkFkhZ us vius i{k dFku ds leFkZu esa Lo;a dk 'kiFk&i=k
izLrqr fd;k gS rFkk vU; lk{khx.k Jh ,l-ih- dqdjsrh ,oa
Jh nsokuUn oekZ ds 'kiFk&i=k izLrqr fd;s gSA izkFkhZ dh lk{; ds
[k.Mu esa vizkFkhZ us Jh dsnkj flag ;kno ofj"B lgk;d] [kku
fu;a=kd dk 'kiFk&i=k izLrqr fd;k x;k gS rFkk izkFkhZ ds dk;Z
fnolksa lanHkZ esa] dk;Z fnolksa dk fooj.k] eLVj jksy ,oa LohÑrh
vkns'k o fcy okmpj dh iQksVks&izfr;ka izLrqr dh xbZ gSA
5- fnukad 20&12&2005 dks fuEu fopkj.kh; fcUnqvksa dh
lajpuk dh xbZA
I. Whether the disputant has worked as chowkidar
in between the period from 1990 to 1999 as shown at para
3 of the claim statement and had completed 240 days of
work in calendar year prior to his temination, whose service
was terminated in contravention of Section 25-F of the
Act?
II. Whether after the temination of workman’s service
the fresh appointments were made in violation of Section
25-H of the Act?
III. Relief, if any
fcUnq la- 1
6- vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e 1947 dh /kjk 25F ds
izkoèkkuksa ds vuqlkj tc fdlh m|ksx esa fu;ksftr fdlh Jfed dh]
tks fu;kstd ds v/hu de ls de ,d o"kZ ds fy, fujUrj lsok esa
jg pqdk gS] NaVuh rc gh dh tk ldrh gS tc mi[k.M (d) ds
vUrxZr fyf[kr lwpuk ns nh xbZ gks ;k lwpuk ds cnys esa lwpuk dh
dkykof/ ds fy, etnwjh ns nh xbZ gks rFkk mi[k.M ([k) esa crk,
vuqlkj izfrdj ns fn;k x;k gks A
7- vf/fu;e dh /kjk 25 (B) esa fujUrj lsok dks ifjHkkf"kr
fd;k x;k gSA ftlds mi[k.M 1 ds vuqlkj Jfed ,d o"kZ dh
dkykof/ esa vfofPNUu lsok esa jgs gksa ;k mi[k.M (2) ds vuqlkj
;fn mlus ml rkjh[k ls] ftldh izfr funsZ'k ls x.kuk dh tkuh gS]
iwoZ ds ckjg dSys.Mj ekl dh dkykof/ ds nkSjku de ls de 240
fnu okLro esa dke fd;k gksA
8- vf/fu;e dh /kjk 25 F ds izko/kuksa dks vkdf"kZr djus
ds fy, ;g fl¼ djus dk izkjafHkd Hkkj izkFkhZ ij Fkk fd mls fnukad
22&12&97 dks lsok ls c[kkZLr fd;k x;k rFkk og o"kZ 1990 ls 99
dh vof/ esa ,d o"kZ dh dkyof/ esa vfofPNUu lsok esa jgk gS ;k
mlus lsok ls c[kkZLr dh frfFk ls iwoZorhZ 12 ekg dh vof/ esa 240
fnu dk;Z fd;k gSA
9- izkFkhZ ds vfHkopuksa ,oa lk{; esa izLrqr 'kiFk&i=k ds
vuqlkj mlus o"kZ 1990 ls o"kZ 1999 dh vof/ esa ,d o"kZ 240
fnu ls vf/d dk;Z fd;k rFkk mlds fuEu dk;Z fnol Fks%&
o"kZ
ekg
dk;Z fnol
1990&91
fofo/ ekg
6 ekg
1996
vDrwcj
15 fnu
uoEcj
29 fnu
fnlEcj
26 fnu
1997
tuojh
26 fnu
iQjojh
25 fnu
ekpZ
25 fnu
vizSy
27 fnu
ebZ
15 fnu
twu
16 fnu
tqykbZ
24 fnu
vxLr
21 fnu
flrEcj
24 fnu
vDrwcj
29 fnu
uoEcj
19 fnu
fnlEcj
22 fnu
10- izkFkhZ }kjk o"kZ 1990 ls 1999 dh dkykof/ esa tks dk;Z
fnol crk;s x;s gSA mlds vuqlkj o"kZ 1990&91 esa 6 ekg gh dk;Z
fd;k rFkk o"kZ 1992 ls 1995 esa mlds dksbZ dk;Zjr fnol ugha gSa A
o"kZ 1996 esa fliQZ vDrwcj ls fnlEcj dh vof/ esa dqy 70 fnu
dk;Z djuk crk;k gS rFkk o"kZ 1997 esa dqy 273 dk;Z fnol n'kkZ;s
gSaA izkFkhZ }kjk crk;s x;s mDr dk;Z fnolksa ls gh ;g Li"V gS fd
4170
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
LohÑr :i ls og /kjk 25 (B) (1) ds izko/kuksa ds vuqlkj fdlh
Hkh o"kZ vfofPNUu lsok esa ugha jgkA
11- vr% fopkj.kh; iz'u ;g jg tkrk gS fd D;k izkFkhZ
vf/fu;e dh /kjk 25 (B) (2) ds izko/kuksa ds vUrxZr ,d o"kZ
^fujUrj lsok* esa jgk gSA blds fy, izkFkhZ dks lsok ls gVkus dh frfFk
rFkk mDr frfFk ds iwoZorhZ 12 ekg dh vof/ esa izkFkhZ ds dk;Z&fnol
izklafxd gSA
12- izkFkhZ ds dFkkuqlkj mls fnukad 22&12&97 dks lsok ls
gVk;k x;k Fkk rFkk o"kZ 1997 esa mlus dqy 273 fnol dk;Z fd;k gS
tcfd vizkFkhZ lk{kh dk dFku gS fd izkFkhZ us dHkh&Hkh yxkrkj 240
fnu dk;Z ugha fd;kA mldk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd vizkFkhZ ds vtesj
esa rhu dk;kZy; fLFkr gSa muds fjdkMZ ds vuqlkj gS o"kZ 1990 ls
1999 ds eè; nks vyx&vyx Jfedksa us dk;Z fd;k gS ftuds uke
Jh nqxkZyky iq=k Jh lq[kkyky ,oa Jh nqxkZyky iq=k Jh lq[kkjke gS
ftuds dk;Z fnol Øe'k% layXu ifjf'k"V I ,oa ifjf'k"V II esa
n'kkZ;s x;s gSa A vizkFkhZ lk{kh dk dFku gS fd ifjf'k"V I esa crk;s
vuqlkj mlds o"kZ 1997 esa 192 dk;Z fnol gh FksA izfrijh{kk esa
mlus uoEcj esa eLVj&jksy ds vuqlkj 24 fnu dk;Z fnol vkSj
crk;s gSa] mUgsa tksM+us ij o"kZ 1997 esa izkFkhZ ds 216 dk;Z fnol gks
tkrs gSaA
13- fo}ku izfrfuf/ izkFkhZ dk rdZ gS fd dqN nLrkostkr esa
izkFkhZ ds firk dk uke vizkFkhZ us izkFkhZ dks feyus okys ykHkksa ls
oafpr djus ds mís'; ls Jh lq[kyky dh txg Jh lq[kjke vafdr
dj fn;k gSA ifjf'k"V II esa Jh nqxkZyky iq=k Jh lq[kkjke ds tks
dk;Z fnol crk;s gSa og Hkh izkFkhZ ds gh dk;Z fnol gSaA mudk ;g Hkh
rdZ gS vizkFkhZ ds }kjk ftu okmpjl ds vk/kj ij dk;Z fnol
n'kkZ;s x;s gSa] muesa Jh nqxkZyky iq=k Jh lq[kkyky o Jh nqxkZyky
iq=k Jh lq[kkjke ds gLrk{kjksa esa lekurk gS tks n'kkZrh gS fd tks
dk;Z&fnol ifjf'k"V 2 esa crk;s gSa og Hkh izkFkhZ ds gh gSA bl izdkj
ifjf'k"V I ,oa ifjf'k"V II esa o"kZ 1997 ds dqy dk;Z fnolksa ls Li"V
gS fd izkFkhZ us o"kZ 1997 esa 240 fnu ls vf/d fnu dk;Z fd;k gS
blfy;s izkFkhZ dks /kjk 25 (F) ds vkKkid izko/kuksa dh ikyuk
fd;s fcuk gVkus dk ÑR; voS/ o vuqfpr gSA
14- mDr rdksZa ds fojks/ esa fo}ku izfrfuf/ vizkFkhZ dk rdZ
gS fd fjdkMZ ds vuqlkj Jh nqxkZyky iq=k Jh lq[kkyky ,oa Jh
nqxkZyky iq=k Jh lq[kkyky nks vyx&2 Jfedx.k Fks rFkk eLVj&jksy
o Hkqxrku okmPkj ds vuqlkj ifjf'k"V 1 esa crk;s dk;Z fnol ij
gh izkFkhZ us dk;Z fd;k Fkk A izkFkhZ us o"kZ 1997 esa dqy 192 fnu gh
dk;Z fd;k gS A vr% ;g ekuk Hkh tkos fd fnukad 22&12&97 dks
lsok ls i`Fkd fd;k x;k Fkk rks mlls iwoZorhZ 12 ekg esa 140 fnu
dk;Z fnol ugha gksrs A izkFkhZ us mDr vof/ esa 140 fnu dk;Z ds
lEcU/ esa dksbZ izys[kh; lk{; izLrqr ugha dh gS rFkk bl rF; dks
izfrijh{kk esa Lohdkj Hkh fd;k gS fd vizkFkhZ ds ;gka dk;Z djus
ckcr dksbZ lcwr is'k ugha fd;k gS A vr% /kjk 25(F) ds izko/ku
izkFkhZ ds ekeys esa ykxw ugha gksrs A
15- eSusa mDr rdks± ij euu fd;k rFkk mudks n`f"Vxr
gq, izklafxd nLrkostkr dk voyksdu fd;k A
16- izkFkhZ ds dFkukuqlkj o"kZ 1997 esa 273 fnu dk;Z fd;k
gS A izfrijh{kk esa dgk gS fnukad 1&11&1996 ls fnukad 22&12&97
rd dk;Z fd;k Fkk A izkFkhZ ds lk{khx.k Jh ,l-ih-dqdjsth ,oa Jh
nsokuUn oekZ us o"kZ 1990 rd izkFkhZ dk vizkFkhZ ds ;gka dk;Zjr
gksuk rks dgk gS ysfdu fdl ekg esa fdrus fnu dk;Z fd;k ;g
ugha crk;k gS A izkFkhZ us viuh izfrijh{kk esa ekuk gS fd mlus
vizkFkhZ ds ;gka dke djus dk lcwr is'k ugha fd;k gS A
17- ;|fi vizkFkhZ ds tokc esa izkDdFku gS fd izkFkhZ ds
dHkh dke ugha fd;k ysfdu vizkFkhZ lk{kh Jh dsnkj ¯lg ;kno
us vius dFku esa ;g ekuk gS fd izkFkhZ dks vLFkkbZ va'kdkyhu ,oa
vkdfLed dk;Z gsrq vko';drk gksus ij j[kk tkrk Fkk A vius
dFku esa ;g ekuk gS fd izkFkhZ ds o"kZ 1997 esa 'kiFk&i=k ds lkFk
layXu ifjf'k"V esa crk;s fuEu dk;Z&fnol Fks %&
o"kZ 1997
iQjojh
25 fnu
ekpZ
25 fnu
vizSy
25 fnu
ebZ
15 fnu
twu
14 fnu
tqykbZ
24 fnu
vxLr
21 fnu
vDVwcj
24 fnu
uoEcj
24 fnu
fnlEcj
19 fnu
dqy 192 fnol
18- vizkFkhZ }kjk o"kZ 1997 izkFkhZ ds dk;Z&fnolksa dk tks
fooj.k izn'kZ 1 esa crk;k x;k gS mlds vuqlkj ekg tuojh]
flrEcj ,oa uoEcj esa izkFkhZ ds dksbZ dk;Z&fnol ugha Fks A uoEcj
ds dk;Z&fnolksa dk tks fooj.k fn;k gS ij mlds vkxs dk;Z&fnolksa
dh tks vof/ vafdr dh gS mlls Li"V gS fd og dk;Z fnol
fnlEcj ds gSa A Jh nqxkZyky iq=k Jh lq[kkyky ds o"kZ 1997 ds
dk;Z&fnolksa dk fooj.k ifjf'k"V II eas n'kkZ;k x;k gS A mlds
vuqlkj tuojh] 97 es mlds 26 dk;Z fnol gSa rFkk flrEcj esa 29
dk;Z fnol Fks A blds vuqlkj o"kZ 1997 ds nks ekgesa Jh nqxkZyky
iq=k Jh lq[kkjke ds dk;Z fnol crk;s gS rFkk 'ks"k 10 esa Jh nqxkZyky
iq=k Jh lq[kkyky ds dk;Z fnol crk;s gSa A
19- ftl fjdkMZ ds vk/kj ij mDr ifjf'k"V I ,oa II esa
dk;Z fnol n'kkZ;s gSa] mUgsa vizkFkhZ }kjk is'k fd;k x;k gS A vizkFkhZ
}kjk izLrqr eLVj&jksy] LohÑfr vkns'k ,oa fcyksa ds voyksdu ls
;g izdV gksrk gS fd tks irk izkFkhZ dk vafdr fd;k gS ogh irk
dqN eLVj&jksy esa Jh nqxkZyky iq=k Jh lq[kkjke dk Hkh vafdr
fd;k gS A blds vykok Ex-W2 ,oa Ex- W2 ij Øe'k% nqxkZyky
iq=k Jh lq[kkyky ,oa nqxkZyky iq=k Jh lq[kkjke ds gLrk{kjksa esa
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4171
lekurk ds lUnHkZ esa vizkFkhz lk{kh ls izfrsijh{kk esa iwNus ij dgk
gS fd og ;g ugha dg ldrk fd ;g ,d gh O;fDr }kjk fd;s
x;s gS ;k ugha A mDr lk{kh us ;g ekuk gS fd mDr nksauks O;fDr;ksa
us ,d lkFk dk;Z ugha fd;k A mlus fliQZ fjdkMZ ds vk/kj ij
crk;k gS fd jsdkMZ Jh nqxkZhyky iq=k Jh lq[kkyky ,oa nqxkZyky
iq=k Jh lq[kkjke ds lEcU/ esa gS A nqxkZyky iq=k Jh lq[kkyky ,oa
nqxkZyky iq=k Jh lq[kkjke ds gLrk{kj okys tks izys[k is'k fd;s gSa
muds voyksdu ls Hkh buds gLrk{kjksa esa lekurk izrhr gksrh gS A
vr% izkFkhZ izfrfuf/ ds bl rdZ esa rks lkj izrhr gksrk gS fd
ifjf'k"V I ,Oka II esa tks dk;Z fnol crk;s x;s gSa og izkFkhZ ds gh
dk;Z fnol gS A
20- vizkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr ifjf'k"V I ,oa II esa o"kZ 1997 esa tks
dk;Z&fnol crk;s x;s gSa mUgsa tksM+us ij dk;Z &fnol rks 240 fnu
ls vf/d gks tkrs gS] ysfdu ;g dk;Z&fnol rc gh izklafxd gSa
tc izkFkhZ ;g fl¼ djus esa liQy jgrk gS fd fnukad 22&12&97
dks mls lsok ls gVk;k x;k Fkk A
21- izkFkhZ ds LVsVeSUV vkWiQ Dyse esa vfHkopu gS fd mls
lsok ls vizkFkhZ us fnukad 22&12&97 dks gVk fn;k ysfdu LVsVeSUV
vkWiQ Dyse esa ;g Hkh vfHkopu gS fd izkFkhZ vizkFkhZ ds v/hu
o"kZ 1990 ls 1999 rd fu;kstu esa jgk rFkk ml vof/ esa ,d o"kZ
esa 240 fnu ls vf/d lsok dk;Z esa jgrs gq, iwjs fd;s A izkFkhZ us
LVsVeSUV ds iSjk 4 esa Li"V :i ls dgk gS fd o"kZ 1998 ls 1999 esa
dk;Zjr jgk ftldk jsdkMZ vizkFkhZ ds ikl gS A izkFkhZ us vius
'kiFk&i=k eas Hkh mDr vfHkopuksa dks nksgjkrs gq, o"kZ 1998 ,oa
1999 esa Hkh dk;Zjr jguk crk;k gS A bl izdkj izkFkhZ ds vfHkopuksa
,oa lk{; esa bl egRoiw.kZ fcUnq ij fojks/kHkkl gS fd mlus o"kZ
1999 rd dk;Z fd;k Fkk ;k fnukad 22&12&97 rd] ;fn og o"kZ
1998 o o"kZ 1999 esa Hkh vizkFkhZ ds ;gka dk;Zjr Fkk rks mls fnukad
22&12&97 dks dk;Z ls gVkus okyh ckr lgh ugha gks ldrh A
22- vizkFkhZ us tks jsdkMZ izLrqr fd;k gS mlesa ifjf'k"V I esa
izkFkhZ ds fnlEcj 1997 esa fnukad 12&12&97 ls fnukad 30&12&97
dqy 19 dk;Z&fnol crk;s gSa A vizkFkhZ lk{kh us Hkh izfrijh{kk dgk
gS fd izkFkhZ us jsdkMZ ds vk/kj ij fnukad 12&12&97 ls 30&12&97
rd dk;Z fd;k Fkk A mlds vykok ifjf'k"V I esa jsdkMZ ds
vk/kj ij o"kZ 1998 esa tuojh] iQjojh] vizSy o twu esa Øe'k%
10] 12]14] 10 dk;Z fnol gksus n'kkZ;s gSa A mlh izdkj o"kZ 1999 esa
iQjojh ,oa ekpZ esa Øe'k% 5 ,oa 7 dk;Z&fnol gksus n'kkZ;s gSa A
ifjf'k"V II esa nqxkZyky iq=k Jh lq[kkjke ds o"kZ 1998 ds ekg
iQjojh esa 8 dk;Z&fnol ,oa o"kZ 1999 esa iQjojh] vizSy] ebZ ,oa
twu esa Øe'k% 10] 3] 20] 9 dk;Z&fnol n'kkZ;s gSa A ifjf'k"V I o
II eas tks dk;Z&fnol o"kZ 1998 o 1999 esa n'kkZ;s gSa mUgsa izkFkhZ ds gh
dk;Z&fnol ekuk tkos rks izkFkhZ us o"kZ 1998 ds ekg tuojh]
iQjojh] ekpZ] vizSy] twu esa Øe'k% 10] 16] 8] 14] 10 fnu dk;Z
fd;k Fkk rFkk o"kZ 1999 esa iQjojh] ekpZ] vizSy] ebZ] twu esa
Øe'k% 15] 17] 3] 20] 9 fnu dk;Z fd;k Fkk A
23- izkFkhZ }kjk ;g LohÑr rF; gS fd o"kZ 1998 ,oa 1999 esa
Hkh og dk;Zjr jgk Fkk ftldk fjdkMZ vizkFkhZ ds ikl gS A vizkFkhZ
us tks jsdkMZ o"kZ 1998 o 1999 dh vof/ dk is'k fd;k gS mlls
Hkh bl rF; dh iqf"V gksrh gS fd o"kZ 1998 ,oa 1999 esa Hkh izkFkhZ
vizkFkhZ ds fu;kstu esa dk;Zjr jgk gS A izkFkhZ dk ;g dsl ugha gS
fd fnukad 22&12&97 dks lsok ls gVkus ds ckn iqu% o"kZ 1998 esa
lsok esa j[k fy;k Fkk A izkFkhZ rks ;g dg dj vk;k gS fd mls
fnukad 22&12&97 dks lsok ls gVkus ds ckn vizkFkhZ us iqu% lsok esa
ysus dk volj iznku ugha fd;k A jsdkMZ ds vuqlkj izkFkhZ fnukad
30&12&97 rd dk;Zjr Fkk rFkk mlds ckn o"kZ 1998 ,oa 1999 esa
Hkh iwoZ esa mYysf[kr eghuksa esa vizkFkhZ ds ;gka dk;Zjr Fkk A
24- vr% izkFkhZ ;g lkfcr djus esa gh vliQy jgk gS fd
mls fnukad 22&12&97 dks lsok ls gVk x;k Fkk A blfy, o"kZ 1997
esa izkFkhZ 240 fnu ls vf/d dk;Zjr jgk gS rks Hkh /kjk 25 B(ii) ds
vUrxZr mldks ,d o"kZ dh ^fujUrj lsok* ugha ekuk tk ldrk
D;ksafd dfFkr frfFk 22&12&97 dks izkFkhZ dks lsok ls gVkuk gh
lkfcr ugha gks ldk gS A vr% ;g fcUnq izkFkhZ ds fojQ¼ r;
fd;k tkrk gS A
fcUnq la- 2
25- izkFkhZ dk dFku gS fd mls lsok ls gVkus ds i'pkr~
vizkFkhZ us /kjk 25 (H) dh vogsyuk djrs gq, ^iQhYM+ vnZyh* ds
in ij fdlh vU; dks j[k fy;k A /kjk 25 H ds izko/ku rc gh
ykxw gksrs gSa tc fdlh deZpkjh dh NaVuh dh xbZ gS izkFkhZ ;g
lkfcr djus esa gh vliQy jgk gS fd mldh NaVuh dfFkr frfFk
22&12&97 dks dh xbZ Fkh A blds vykok vizkFkhZ dks dFku gS fd
^iQhYM vnZyh* ds in ij mls volj u nsdj vU; dk lsok esa j[k
fy;k A izkFkhZ us Lo;a ;g dgk gS fd mls lk{kkRdkj gsrq cqyk;k
x;k Fkk A mlds vykok ftl in ij fu;qfDr fn;k tkuk crk;k
gS og in gh izkFkhZ ftl in ij dk;Zjr Fkk mlls fHkUu gS A tgka
lk{kkRdkj ds vk/kj ij izkFkhZ dks Hkh volj nsrs gq, vU; dh
fu;qfDr dh xbZ gks] ogka /kjk 25 H ds izko/ku ykxw ugha gksrs A
vr% izkFkhZ ;g lkfcr djus esa vliQy jgk gS fd vf/fu;e dh
/kjk 25 H ds izko/ku dk mYy?kau djrs gq, fdlh vU; O;fDr
dks fu;qfDr nh xbZ gS] vr% ;g fcUnq Hkh izkFkhZ ds fo#¼ r; fd;k
tkrk gS A
fcUnq la- 3
26- pwafd izkFkhZ ;g lkfcr djus esa vliQy jgk gS fd
vizkFkhZ us vf/fu;e dh /kjk 25 dk mYya?ku djrs gq, mls fnukad
22&12&97 dks lsok ls i`Fkd dj fn;k rFkk mlds ckn fu;kstu dk
volj fn, fcuk fdlh vU; dks /kjk 25 H ds izko/kuksa dk
mYya?ku djrs gq, fu;qfDr ns nh xbZ] blfy, izkFkhZ dksbZ vuqrks"k
izkIr djus dk vf/dkjh ugha gS A
27- mijksDr foospu ds vuqlkj ;g izekf.kr ugha gS fd
vizkFkhZ [kku fu;a=kd Hkkjrh; [kku C;wjks] vtesj }kjk izkFkhZ deZdkj
Jh nqxkZyky dks fnukad 22&2&97 dks voS/ ,oa vuqfpr :i ls
lsok esa c[kkZLr fd;k x;k Fkk A ifj.kkeLo:i] izkFkhZ dksbZ vuqrks"k
izkIr djus dk vf/dkjh ugha gS A U;k;fu.kZ;u gsrq izsf"kr funsZ'k dk
mÙkj mDr izdkj fn;k tkrk gS A iapkV rnuqlkj ikfjr fd;k
tkrk gS A
,u- ds- iqjksfgr] ihBklhu vf/dkjh
4172
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ubZ fnYyh] 10 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1588-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ , ,l
vkbZ ds çca/ra=k ds laca¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky; t;iqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 59@2005)
dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 10&07&2013 dks
çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹iQk- la- ,y&42012@128@2004&vkbZ vkj (lh ,e&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 10th July, 2013
S.O. 1588.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 59/2005)
of the Cent. Govt. Indus. Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,
Jaipur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute
between the management of archeological Survey of India,
and their workmen, received by the Central Government on
10-07-2013.
[ F. No. L- 42012/128/2004-IR (CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL
TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, JAIPUR
N. K. PUROHIT, Presiding Officer.
I.D. 59/2005
Reference No. L-42012/128/2004-(IR(CM-II)
dated : 24.5.2005
Sh. Umed Singh
S/o Shri Hanuman Singh Rao,
R/o Post Udaipurvati,
Jhunjhunu.
V/s
The Superintendent Archaeologist
Archeological Survey of India,
70/133-140, Patel Marg,
Mansoravar, Jaipur.
Present
For the applicant
:
Ex-party,
For the non-applicant
:
Sh. T. P. Sharma,
AWARD
29-4-2013
1. The Central Government in exercise of the powers
conferred under clause (d) of Sub Section 1 & 2(A) of
Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 has referred
the following Industrial dispute to this tribunal for
adjudication :—
“Whether the action of the management of
Archeological Survey of India, Jaipur in terminating
the services of Shri Umed Singh w.e.f. 21-9-1998 is
legal & justified? If not, to what relief workman is
entitled and from which date?
2. The workman in his claim statement has pleaded
that he had worked as class IV employee under the
non-applicant during period April, 97 to 20-9-98. He has
further pleaded that despite he had worked continuously
for 467 days’ during said period his services has been
terminated on 21-9-98 without assigning any reason in
violation of Section 25-F of the I.D.Act. The workman has
prayed for his reinstatement with all consequential benefits.
3. In reply, while denying the claim of the workman,
the non-applicant has contended that non-applicant
establishment is not an ‘industry’ as defined under Section
2-J of the Act. It has further been contended that the
workman was engaged as Beldar for temporary & casual
nature of work for repairing work of the Jagat Siromani
Temple. The workman was not employed against any post
& no appointment letter was given to him. It has also been
contended that the services of the workman were not
terminated by the non-applicant &, he had left the job for
better employment. Apart that, the work for which he was
engaged had been completed, therefore, the claim of the
workman be rejected.
4. Following points for determination were
framed :—
i. Whether the workman had continuously worked
from April, 97 to 20.9.98 under the employment of
the non- applicant establishment whose service
was terminated in violation of section 25-F of the
I.D. Act.
ii. Relief, if any.
5. In evidence, the workman has filed his affidavit in
support of his case. In rebuttal, the non-applicant has
filed the counter affidavit Prithviraj Singh, Superintendent,
Archeology, Jaipur region.
6. At the stage of final argument, none appeared on
behalf of the applicant, therefore, ex-party proceedings
were drawn against the workman.
7. The ld. Representative on behalf of the non-
applicant has submitted his written submissions.
8. The non-applicant in its reply has raised
preliminary objection that non-applicant Department is not
an 'industry' u/s 2-J of the I.D.Act but no point for
determination has been framed in this regard.
9. It has been contended on behalf of the non-
applicant that non-applicant Department does not come
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4173
under the purview of definition of an 'industry' u/s 2-J of
the I.D. Act in view of the nature of work of the Department.
He has further contended that non-applicant Department
is not doing any commercial activitiesand it is not
functioning for profit. He has also contended that in view
of the office memorandum of the Under Secretary, Govt.
of India, Ministry of Tourism No. 15-10/2001
Estt. Dated 15-9-2000, the non-applicant Department is
not an ‘industry’.
10. As per definition of ‘industry’ under section 2-J
of the I.D. Act any business, trade, undertaking,
manufacture, or calling of employers is an 'industry' and it
includes any calling, service, employment, handicraft, or
industrial occupation or avocation of workmen.
11. The definition of industry was dealt with by a
constitutional bench of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the
case of Banglore Water Supply case wherein the criteria
for determining the activity of an establishment as an
‘industry’ was laid down. It has been held that where there
is (i) Systematic activity (ii) Organized by Co-operation
between employer & employee (iii) for the production or
distribution of goods & services calculated to satisfy
human wants & wishes (not spiritual or religious but
including of material things). Prime facie, there is an
industry in the enterprise. Hon’ble Apex Court has
observed that absence of profit motive & objective is
irrelevant. The true focus is functional & decisive test is
the nature of the activity with special emphasis on the
employer employee relation.
12. In the present case, the office memorandum dated
15-9-2003 on the basis of which it has been contended
that non-applicant Department is not an ‘industry’ has
not peen brought on record. The management witness
has stated that the non-applicant Department is not doing
any commercial activities & the Department is functioning
without any profit motive & in view of the nature of work
it is not an 'industry'. But it is well settled that the absence
of profit motive or gainful object is irrelevant in this regard.
The decisive test is the nature of the activity. The nature
of work which has been stated by the management witness
is not such on the basis of which it can be said that the
non-applicant Department is exercising any sovereign
function. The work of the non-applicant Department is
not of such a nature which cannot be assigned to private
bodies. The non-applicant Department fulfills the criteria
laid down in the Banglore Water Supply case and it cannot
be exempted from the scope of section 2-J. Therefore, the
preliminary objection raised by the non-applicant in this
regard is not tenable.
Point No.1
13. To attract the provision of Section 25-F of
I.D. Act one of the conditions required is that the workman
is employed in any industry for a continuous period which
would not be less than one year.
14. The expression “continuous period” occur in
section 25-F has been defined in section 25-B of the
I.D. Act. Under sub- section (1) of the section 25-B, if a
workman has put in uninterrupted service of establishment
including the service which may be interrupted on account
of sickness, authorize leave, accident, a strike which is not
illegal, a lock out or secession of work that is not due to
any fault on the part of the workman shall be said to be
continuous service for one year i.e. 12 months in respect
of number of days he has actually worked with interrupted
service permissible under sub section (1) of section 25-B.
15. Sub section 2 of section 25-B of the LD. Act says
that even if a workman has not been in continuous service
for a period of one year as envisaged under sub-section
(1) of 25-B of LD.Act, he shall be deemed to have been in
such continuous service for a eriod of one year if he has
actually worked under the employer for 240 days in
preceding period of twelve months from the date of his
termination. The said sub-section provides for a fiction to
treat a workman in continuous service for a period of one
year despite the fact that he has not rendered uninterrupted
service for a period of one year.
16. In . the background of the legal provisions set
forth above, factual scenario in the present case is to be
examined.
17. The initial burden was on the workman to prove
that he had remained under the employment of the non-
applicant as a workman for a continuous period of at least
one year as envisaged u/s 25-F of the I.D.Act therefore,
his termination without notice or compensation in lieu of
notice was in violation of the said section.
18. It is not the case of the workman that he had
worked uninterruptedly for a period of one year as
envisaged under section 25-B(1) of the I.D.Act, therefore,
the question survives for consideration is whether the
workman had worked for at least 240 days during preceding
12 months from the date of his alleged termination.
19. The workman in his affidavit has deposed that
his services were terminated on 21-9-98, therefore, the
period of preceding 12 months from the date of his
termination is only relevant. Thus, it is to be seen whether
the workman had worked for at least 240 days during period
21-9-97 to 20-09-98.
20. The workman has stated that despite he had
continuously worked for 467 days during period April, 97
to Sep.98, his service was terminated on 21.9.98 in
contravention of the provisions of Section 25-F of the
I.D.Act.
21. In rebuttal, the management witness Sh. Prithviraj
Singh has stated that the workman was engaged
temporarily for casual nature work for repairing work of
temple. He was employed on 2.4.97 as daily wager unskilled
4174
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Beldar. He has further stated that no appointment letter
was given to the workman. He has also stated that the
work for which the workman was engaged had been
completed. He has further stated that services of the
workman were not terminated rather he himself had left
the job for better employment.
22. Vide order dated 29.3.06 directions were given to
the non-applicant Department to produce the muster rolls
of the period from April, 97 to 20.9.98. In compliance of the
said directions, the photocopies of attendance and
payment register for the period 2.4.97 to 31.8.98 have been
produced.
23. The number of actual working days during period
of preceding 12 months from the date of termination i.e.
from 21-9-97 to 20-9-98 stated by the workman in his
affidavit and number of working days during said period
as per record produced by the non-applicant are as below:-
Month & Year
As per
As per
Payment
statement
payment
@ 40/p. day
of the
register of
workman
Management
Sep, 97
26
25
1200
Oct, 97
27
27
1200
Nov, 97
26
26
1040
Dec, 97
27
26
1040
Jan, 98
27
27
1080
Feb, 98
24
24
960
March, 98
27
26
1040
April, 98
26
27
1080
May, 98
27
27
1080
June, 98
26
25
1000
July, 98
27
27
1080
Aug, 98
27
25
1000
Sep, 98
20
16
640
24. Thus, the statement of the workman that he had
worked for more than 240 days during preceding 12 months
from the date of termination finds support from the record
produced by the non-applicant. Admittedly, no notice,
notice pay or compensation was paid to the workman in
compliance of the provisions of the Section 25-F of the
ID. Act, therefore, termination of the workman being in
violation of provisions of Section 25-F is illegal.
Point No. II
25. Since, point no.1 has been decided against the
non-applicant and it has been concluded that termination
of the workman being in violation of Section 25-F of the
I.D. Act is illegal, it is to be seen what relief the workman
is entitled to.
26. This legal position is not in dispute that in case
of non compliance of section 25-F the workman can be
reinstated with other consequential reliefs.
27. Earlier in cases of termination in violation of
section 25-F reinstatement of the workman with full back
wages used to be automatically granted, but keeping in
view several other factors, a change in the said trend is
now found in the recent decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme
Court. In a large number of decisions in the matter of grant
of relief of the kind, Hon’ble Apex Court has distinguished
between a daily wager who does not hold a post and a
permanent employee.
28. In recent decision (2010) 1 SCC (L&S) 545 Jagbir
Singh V/s Haryana State Agriculture Mktg. Board after
considering the earlier decisions referred to therein on the
point should an order of reinstatement automatically
follows in a case of violation of Section 25-F of the I.D.Act
Hon'ble Apex Court has observed that : -
“It would be, thus seen that by a catena of decisions
in recent time, this Court has clearly laid down that
an order of retrenchment passed in violation of
Section 25-F although may be set aside but an award
of reinstatement should not, however, be
automatically passed. The award of reinstatement
with full back wages in a case where the workman
has completed 240 days of work in a year preceding
the date of termination, particularly, daily wagers
has not been found to be proper by this Court and
instead compensation has been awarded. This court
has distinguished between a daily wager who does
not hold a post and a permanent employee. ”
29. Continuing this line of approach in decision
(2010) 2 SCC (L&S) 376 Hon’ble Apex Court has observed
as under :-
“While the earlier view of the Court was that if an
order of termination was found to be illegal, normally
the relief to be granted would be reinstatement with
full back wages. However, with the passage of time
it came to be realized that an industry should not be
compelled to pay to the workman for the period
during which he apparently contributed little or
nothing at all. The relief to be granted is discretionary
and not automatic. A person is not entitled to get
something only because it would be lawful .to do
so. The changes brought out by the subsequent
decisions of the Supreme court probably having
regard to the changes in the policy decisions of the
Government in the wake of prevailing market
economy, globalization, privatization and
outsourcing was evident. Hence now there is no
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4175
such principle that for an illegal termination of
service the normal rule is reinstatement with back
wages, and instead the Labour court can award
compensation.”
“There has been a shift in the legal position
laid down by the Supreme Court and now there is no
hard-and-fast principle that on the termination of
service being found to be illegal reinstatement with
back wages is to be awarded. Compensation can be
awarded instead, at the discretion of the Labour
Court, depending on the facts and circumstances of
the case.”
30. In present matter, the workman has worked as
daily weger Beldar and he was getting Rs 40 per day as
wages. He was not holding any regular post. Keeping in
view the nature of job and nature of employment, the
delay in raising dispute, the laps of time after termination
of the services, the total length of service rendered by the
claimant and having regard the entire facts and
circumstances of the case, instead of reinstating him the
interest of justice will be sub served by paying
compensation to the workman instead and in lieu of relief
of reinstatement in service.
31. Accordingly, the reference is answered in
affirmative in favour of the workman and it is held that the
action of the management in termination of the services of
the workman being in violation of section 25-F of the Act
is illegal and unjustified. Therefore, the non-applicant is
directed to pay compensation to the workman worth Rs.
25000/-( Twenty Five Thousand Only) instead and in lieu
of his reinstatement of service. The payment shall be made
within eight weeks from the date of publication of the
award failing which it shall carry interest @ 8% per annum.
32. Award as above.
N. K. PUROHIT, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 10 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1589-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ ch lh
lh ,y ds çca/ra=k ds laca¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds
chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k
28@2001) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 10&07&2013
dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y&22012@26@2001&vkbZ vkj (lh ,e&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 10th July, 2013
S.O. 1589.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 28/2001)
of the Cent. Govt. Indus. Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,
Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial
dispute between the management of Victoria West Colliery,
and their workmen received by the Central Government
o
n
10-07-2013.
[No. L- 22012/26/2001-IR (CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
ASANSOL
PRESENT :
Sri Jyanta Kumar Sen, Presiding Officer
Reference No. 28 of 2001
PARTIES :
The management of Victoria West Colliery of. M/s.
ECL, Burdwan.
Vs.
The Jt. Secy., JCMC Asansol, Burdwan (W.B.)
REPRESENTATIVES :
For the Management
:
P.K. Das, Ld. Advocate
For the Union (Workman)
:
None
Industry : COAL
State : WEST BENGAL
Dated 15-05-2013
AWARD
In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-
section (1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), Govt. of India
through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No.
L-22012/26/2001-IR (CM-II) dated 30-08-2001 has been
pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by
this Tribunal.
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of Victoria
West Colliery of BCCL in deducting the wages for 8 days
in respect of Shri Mustaqeen Mia No. 2 and other Trammers
(list enclosed) for participation in strike on 15-07-1999 is
justified ? If not, to what relief the concerned workmen are
entitled to?”
Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/26/
2001-IR (CM-II) dated 30-08-2001 of the above said
reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour,
New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference case
No. 28 of 2001 was registered on 24-09-2001 and
accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue
notices through the registered post to the parties
concerned directing them to appear in the court on the
4176
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
date fixed and to file their written statements along with
the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support
of their claims. In pursuance of the said order notices by
the registered post were sent to the parties concerned.
On perusal of the case record, it has found that the
workman is neither appearing nor taking any step since
2006. Several opportunities were given but of no effect. It
seems that the workman is now not interested to proceed
with the case any further. Since the workman is not
interested to proceed with the case, the case is closed and
accordingly an order of “ No Dispute” award is hereby
passed.
ORDER
Let an “Award” be and the same is passed as “No
Dispute” existing. Send the copies of the order to the Govt.
of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for needful
information. The reference is accordingly disposed of.
JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 10 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1590-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ lh
,y ds çca/ra=k ds laca¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vlulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k
122@2005)dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks
10&07&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y&22012@380@2004 vkbZ vkj (lh ,e&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 10th July, 2013
S.O. 1590.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 122/
2005) of the Cent. Govt. Indus. Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, ASANSOL as shown in the Annexure, in the
industrial dispute between the management of M/s. Eastern
Coalfields Limited, and their workmen received by the
Central Government on 10-7-2013.
[ No. L- 22012/380/2004-IR (CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL
TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL
PRESENT : SRI JYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding
Officer.
Reference No. 122 of 2005
PARTIES :
The management of Kunustoria Colliery of. M/s.
ECL, Burdwan (WB)
Vs.
Sri Rakesh Kumar, Gen. Secretary, KMC, Asansol
(W.B.)
REPRESENTATIVES :
For the Management : Sri P.K. Das, Ld. Advocate
For the Union (Workman) : Sri Rakesh Kumar,
Ld. Representative
Industry : COAL
State : WEST BENGAL
Dated 03-06-2013
SETTLEMENT AWARD IN LOK ADALA T
HELD ON 03-06-13 AT KUNUSTORIA
GUEST HOUSE
In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-
section( I) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947( 14 of 1947), Govt. of India
through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No.
L-220 12/380/2004-I.R.(CM-II) dated 07.09.05 has been
pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by
this Tribunal.
SCHEDULE
‘‘Whether the action of the management of
Kunustoria Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields
Limited in dismissing Sh. Lakhan Kora, U.G. Loader
from service w.e.f. 31.7/2.8.2003 is legal and justified'!
If not, to what relief the concerned workman is
entitled ’’
Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/
380/2004-I.R.(CM-ll) dated 7-9-05 of the above said
reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New
Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference case No.
122 of 2005 was registered on 23-09-2005 and accordingly
an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through
the registered post to the parties concerned directing them
to appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their
written statements along with the relevant documents and
a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance
of the said order notices by the registered post were sent
to the parties concerned.
On amicable settlement by both parties the dispute
is resolved in the Lok Adalat. The form 'H' containing the
terms of agreement of this settlement to be executed by
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4177
both the parties in due course. Award is passed and signed
accordingly.
ORDER
Let an "Award" be and same is passed as per above
discussion. Form 'H' containing terms and conditions does
form as an integral part of the Award. Send the copies of
the award to the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour &
Employment, New Delhi for information and needful. The
reference is accordingly disposed of.
JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 10 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1591-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ lh
,y ds çca/ra=k ds laca¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky; vlulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 05@2001)
dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 10&7&2013 dks çkIr
gqvk Fkk A
¹iQk- la- ,y&22012@453@1999&vkbZ vkj (lh ,e&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 10th July, 2013
S.O. 1591.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 05/
2001) of the Cent. Govt. Indus. Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, ASANSOL as shown in the Annexure, in the
industrial dispute between the management of Kunustorial
Colliery, M/s. E.C. Limited, and their workmen received by
the Central Government on 10-07-2013.
[ F. No. L- 22012/453/1999-IR (CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL
TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL
PRESENT : SRI JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding
Officer.
Reference No. 05 of 2001
PARTIES : The management of Kunustorial Colliery of
M/s. ECL, Burdwan
Vs.
The Gen. Secy., KMC, Asansol (WB)
REPRESENTATIVES:
For the Management : Shri P.K. Das, Ld. Advocate
For the union (Workman) : Shri H. L. Soni,
Ld. Representative
INDUSTRY: COAL STATE: WEST BENGAL
Dated - 14-03-13
AWARD
In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of
Sub-section(1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947), Govt. of India
through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L-22012/
453/99-IR(C-II) dated 05-02-2001 has been pleased to refer
the following dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal.
SCHEDULE
‘‘Whether the action of the management of
Kunustorial Colliery under ECL, P.O. Toposi, Dist.
Burdwan denying offer of employment to the
dependent of Kujrath Khan, Ex-Tyndel is justified?
If not, to what relief the workman is entitled?’’
Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/
453/99-IR(C-II) dated 05-02-2001 of the above said reference
from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for
adjudication of the dispute, a reference case No. 05 of
2001 was registered on 15.02.2001 and accordingly an order
to that effect was passed to issue notices through the
registered post to the parties concerned directing them to
appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their written
statements along with the relevant documents and a list
of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance of
the said order notices by the registered post were sent to
the parties concerned.
It is an admitted fact that Kujrath Khan was an
Ex-Tyndel in Kunustorial Colliery under ECL, P.O. Toposi,
Dist. - Burdwan. It is also an admitted fact that the Services
of the workman were terminated on the medical ground
with effect from 07-03-1990 on the basis of the repost of
Medical Board constituted by the Management, dated
21-01-1990. After dismissal the management advised
Kujrath Khan to submit application with documental
evidence for employment of his dependant son. It further
appears from the record that the matter of employment of
Jainul Khan, S/o. Kujrath Khan was taken up by the
Management vide Reference No. A. KNT/P & IA/R/1105
dated 23-04-1990 by personal Manager of Kunustoria
Area, and accordingly notices were issued to Jainul Khan,
S/o. Kujrath Khan (SI. No. 16) along with other employee.
It has been submitted on behalf of the employer nor he
had submitted all the documents before the Management
for the employment of Jainul Khan, the dependant son for
employment in place of the workman Kujrath Khan, and
the same was scrutanised screened on Area Level on
30-04-1990 and Jainul Khan was medically examined (pre-
employment) and found fit for employment, and the
employment proposal was sent to Head-Quarter by the
4178
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Area Office under their Letter No. A/KNT/P & IR/NS/17/
7607 dated 17-09-1990 followed by the reminder but
unfortunately the employment file was lost in transit by
the Management.
On perusal of the record I find that it is true that the
original employment file of Kujrath Khan was processed
by the Area and the said HQs, but subsequently the original
file lost during transit (Ref. No. ECL/CMD/C-6E/96/20/96
dated 29-01-96, issued from C.M.D. Office, Sanctoria, ECL.
It further appears that even after several reminders no
action has been taken by the Management for not
complying the order against the concerning officer for
lost of the employment file and about 17 years passed and
the dependant son has not got employment till yet. Really
it is great slackness of the part of Management for not
providing job to the son of the Ex-employee, Kujrath Khan,
and he has to knock the door of justice. The action of the
Management is no doubt against the "Natural justice
specially when the son of Kujrath Khan was found
medically fit for employment I find that the Management
also did not bother to furnish the documents and produce
the same before this Tribunal.
Thus I find that the action of the Management of
Kunustorial Colliery, under ECL, P.O.- Toposi, Dist-
Burdwan denying offer of employment to Jainul Khan,
dependant son of Kujrath Khan, is totally arbitrarily and
is against the provision of law and is unjustified. So, in my
opinion the action taken by the Management is hereby
set aside.
Management is advised to give employment to Jainul
Khan dependant son of Kujrath Khan within three months
from the date of Notification after complying all the
formalities.
ORDER
Let an "Award" be and the same is passed as per
above discussion. Send the copies of the order to the
Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for
information and needful. The reference is accordingly
disposed of.
JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 10 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1592-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ lh
,y ds çca/ra=k ds laca¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky; vlulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 19@2012)
dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 10&07&2013 dks
çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y&22012@32@2012&vkbZ vkj (lh ,e&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 10th July, 2013
S.O. 1592.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 19/
2012) of the Cent. Govt. Indus. Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, ASANSOL as shown in the Annexure, in the
industrial dispute between the management of J. K. Nagar
Colliery, M/s. E.C. Limited, and their workmen received by
the Central Government on 10-07-2013.
[ No. L- 22012/32/2012-IR (CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL
TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL
PRESENT : Sri Jayanta Kumar Sen, Presiding Officer.
Reference No. 19 of 2012
PARTIES :The management of J. K. Nagar Colliery Satgram
Area of M/s. ECL, Burdwan
Vs.
Sri D. K. Routh, Branch Jt. Secy.,CMC (HMS),
Asansol Burdwan (WB).
REPRESENTATIVES :
For the Management : Sri P. K. Goswami,
Ld. Advocate
For the Union (Workman) : None
Industry : COAL State :WEST BENGAL
Dated 25-04-2013
AWARD
In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-
section(1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the
I ndustrial Disputes Act, 1947( 14 of 1947), Govt. of India
through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No.
L-22012/32/2012-I.R.(CM-II) dated 19-04-2012 has been
pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by
this Tribunal.
SCHEDULE
‘‘Whether the action of the management of J. K.
Nagar Colliery of M/s. ECL in not payment HRA @
10% of Basic Pay to Sri Tohir Ahamad is fair and
justified? To what relief the concerned workman is
entitled? ’’
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4179
Having received the Order of Letter No.L-22012/32/
2012-I.R.(CM-ll) dated 19-04-2012 of the above said
reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New
Delhi for adjudication of the dispute. a reference case No.
19 of 2012 was registered on 8-05-12 and accordingly an
order to that effect was passed to issue notices through
the registered post to the parties concerned directing them
to appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their
written statements along with the relevant documents and
a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance
of the said order notices by.the registered post were sent
to the parties concerned.
On perusal of the case record. it has been found that
Sri D. K. Routh, Branch Jt. Secretary of the Union, submits
that the workman is not interested to proceed with the
case and further prayed for the closure of the case. Since
the workman is not interested to proceed with the case,
the case is closed and accordingly an order ‘‘No Dispute’’
award is hereby passed.
ORDER
Let an "Award" be and the same is passed as ‘‘No
Dispute’’ existing. Send the copies of the order to the
Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for
needful and information. The reference is accordingly
disposed of.
JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 10 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1593-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ lh
,y ds çca/ra=k ds laca¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky; vlulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 33@1998)
dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 10&07&2013 dks
çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y&22012@328@1997&vkbZ vkj (lh ,e&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 10th July, 2013
S.O. 1593.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 33/
1998) of the Cent. Govt. Indus. Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, ASANSOL as shown in the Annexure, in the
industrial dispute between the management of Madhujore
Colliery, M/s. E.C. Limited, and their workmen received by
the Central Government on 10-07-2013.
[No. L- 22012/328/1997-IR (CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL
TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL
PRESENT : Sri Jayanta Kumar Sen, Presiding Officer.
Reference No. 33 of 1998
PARTIES : The management of Madhujore Colliery,
M/s. ECL, Burdwan
Vs.
The Gen. Secy., KMC, Asansol Burdwan (WB)
REPRESENTATIVES :
For the Management : None
For the Union (Workman) : Sri Rakesh Kumar,
Ld. Representative
Industry : COAL State :WEST BENGAL
Dated 14-05-2013
AWARD
In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-
section(1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the
I ndustrial Disputes Act, 1947( 14 of 1947), Govt. of India
through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No.
L-22012/328/97-I.R.(CM-II) dated 23-07-1998 has been
pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by
this Tribunal.
SCHEDULE
‘‘Whether the action of the management of
Madhujore Colliery of M/s. ECL in not regularising
the services of Sh. Murtja Ali, Shadat Mia, Bhola
Shaw and R. K. Singh as security Guards is legal
and justified? To what relief the concerned workman
is entitled? ’’
Having received the Order of Letter No.L-22012/328/
97-I.R.(CM-ll) dated 23-07-1998 of the above said reference
from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for
adjudication of the dispute. a reference case No. 33 of
1998 was registered on 10-08-1998 and accordingly an order
to that effect was passed to issue notices through the
registered post to the parties concerned directing them to
appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their written
statements along with the relevant documents and a list
of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance of
the said order notices by the registered post were sent to
the parties concerned.
On perusal of the case record. it has been found that
Sri Rakesh Kumar, General Secretary of the Union, submits
that the workman are not interested to proceed with the
case and further prayed for the closure of the case. Since
the workman are not interested to proceed with the case,
the case is closed and accordingly an order ‘‘No Dispute’’
award is hereby passed.
ORDER
Let an "Award" be and the same is passed as ‘‘No
Dispute’’ existing. Send the copies of the order to the
Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for
needful information. The reference is accordingly
disposed of.
JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer
4180
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ubZ fnYyh] 10 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1594-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZlh,y
ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k
37@2000) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 10&7&2013
dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y&22012@330@1999&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 10th July, 2013
S.O. 1594.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 37/
2000) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the
Industrial Dispute between the management of Khandra
Colliery, M/s. E.C. Ltd. and their workmen, received by the
Central Government on 10-7-2013.
[No. L- 22012/330/1999-IR (CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
ASANSOL
Present : SRI JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, PRESIDING OFFICER,
REFERENCE NO. 37 OF 2000
Parties :
The management of Khandra Colliery
of M/s. ECL, Burdwan
VS.
The Gen. Secy., UCMU(INTUC),
Ukhra, Burdwan ((W.B.)
Representatives :
For the Management
:
Sh. P. K. Das,
Ld. Advocate.
For the Union (Workman)
:
None
Industry : Coal
State : West Bengal
Dated : 21-5-2013
AWARD
In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-
section (1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), Govt. of India
through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L-22012/
330/99-IR(CM-II) dated 07-03-2000 has been pleased to
refer the following dispute for adjudication by this
Tribunal.
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of Khandra
Colliery of M/s. ECL in not regularising Sh. Swapan
Dutta, Mining Trainee as Magazine Issue Clerk, since
6-05-1995 and not paying the differential wages is
legal and j ustified? If not, what relief the workman
is entitled to?”
Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/
330/99-IR (CM-II) dated 07.03.2000 of the above said
reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New
Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference case No.
37 of 2000 was registered on 18.04.2000 and accordingly
an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through
the registered post to the parties concerned directing them
to appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their
written statements along with the relevant documents and
a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance
of the said order notices by the registered post were sent
to the parties concerned.
On perusal of the case record, it has found that the
Union is neither appearing nor taking any step since 2008.
It seems that the workman is now not interested to proceed
with the case any further. The case is also too old of the
year 2000. Since the workman is not interested to proceed
with the case, the case is closed and accordingly an order
of ‘‘No Dispute’’ award is hereby passed.
ORDER
Let an “Award” be and the same is passed as “No
Dispute” existing. Send the copies of the order to the Govt.
of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for needful
information. The reference is accordingly disposed of.
JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 10 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1595-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZlh,y
ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k
40@2006) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 10&7&2013
dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y&22012@242@2005&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 10th July, 2013
S.O. 1595.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 40/
2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the
Industrial Dispute between the management of North
Searsole Colliery of M/s. E.C. L. and their workmen, received
by the Central Government on 10-7-2013.
[No. L- 22012/242/2005-IR (CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4181
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
ASANSOL
Present : SRI JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, PRESIDING OFFICER,
REFERENCE NO. 40 OF 2006
Parties :
The management of North Searsole
Colliery of M/s. ECL, Burdwan (WB)
Vs.
Sri S.K. Pandey, Gen. Secy., KMC,
Asansol (WB)
Representatives :
For the Management
:
Sh. P. K. Das,
Ld. Advocate.
For the Union (Workman)
:
Sri S. K. Pandey,
Ld. Representative
Industry : Coal
State : West Bengal
Dated : 3-6-2013
SETTLEMENT AWARD IN LOK ADALAT HELD ON
03-06-13 AT KUNUSTORIA GUEST HOUSE
In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-
sectiont (1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section l0 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947( 14 of 1947) Govt. of India
through the Ministry of Labour, vide its Order No. L-22012/
242/2005-I.R.(CM-II) dated 2-08-2006 has been pleased to
refer the following dispute for adjudication by this
Tribunal.
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of North
Searsole Colliery under Kunustoria Area of
M/s. Eastern Coalfields Ltd. in dismissing Sh. Sukhlal
Majhi, U.G. Loader from service w.e.f. 8-04-2002 is
justified? If not, to what relief is the workman
entitled ?”
Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/
242/2005-IR(CM-II) dated 2-8-2006 of the above said
reference from the Government of India, Ministry of
Labour, New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a
reference case No. 40 of 2006 was registered on 14-8-2006
and accordingly an order to that effect was passed to
issue notices through the registered post to the parties
concerned directing them to appear in the court on the
date fixed and to file their written statements along with
the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support
of their claims. In pursuance of the said order notices by
the registered post were sent to the parties concerned.
On amicable settlement by both parties the dispute
is resolved in the Lok Adalat. The Form ‘H’ containing the
terms of agreement of this settlement to be executed by
both the parties in due course. Award is passed and signed
accordingly.
ORDER
Let an “Award” be and same is passed as per above
discussion. Form ‘H’ containing terms and conditions does
form as an integral part of the Award. Send the copies of
the award to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour
and Employment, New Delhi for information and needful.
The reference is accordingly disposed of.
JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 10 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1596-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZlh,y
ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k
80@2000) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 10&7&2013
dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y&22012@42@2000&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 10th July, 2013
S.O. 1596.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 80/
2000) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the
Industrial Dispute between the management of
Ghanshyampur Colliery, M/s. E.C. Ltd. and their workmen,
received by the Central Government on 10-7-2013.
[No. L- 22012/42/2005-IR (CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
ASANSOL
Present : SRI JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, PRESIDING OFFICER,
REFERENCE NO. 80 OF 2000
Parties :
The management of Ghanshyampur
Colliery of M/s. ECL, Burdwan
Vs.
The Jt. Gen. Secy., CMU, Ukhra,
Burdwan (WB)
Representatives :
For the Management
:
Sh. P. K. Goswami,
Ld. Advocate.
For the union (Workman)
:
None
Industry : Coal
State : West Bengal
Dated : 29-5-2013
4182
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
AWARD
In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-
section(l) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947( 14 of 1947), Govt. of India
through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L-22012/
42/2000-IR(CM-II) dated 21.08.2000 has been pleased to
refer the following dispute for adjudication by this
Tribunal.
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of
Ghanshyampur Colliery of M/s. ECL in dismissing
Sh. Ramani Bhuia, Underground Loader from
services is legal and justified? If not, to what relief
the workman is entitled?”
Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/42/
2000-IR(CM-II) dated 21.08.2000 of the above said
reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New
Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference case No.
80 of 2000 was registered on 06.09.2000 and accordingly
an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through
the registered post to the parties concerned directing them
to appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their
written statements along with the relevant documents and
a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance
of the said order notices by the registered post were sent
to the parties concerned.
On perusal of the case record, it has found that the
workman is neither appearing nor taking any step since
15.01.2008. It seems that the workman is now not interested
to proceed with the case any further. The case is also too
old - of the year 2000. Since the workman is not interested
to proceed with the case, the case is closed and accordingly
an order of “No Dispute” award is hereby passed.
ORDER
Let an “Award” be and the same is passed as “No
Dispute” existing. Send the copies of the order to the Govt.
of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for needful
information. The reference is accordingly disposed of.
JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 10 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk-1597-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZlh,y
ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k
18@2004) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 10&7&2013
dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y 22012@137@2003&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 10th July, 2013
S.O. 1597.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 18/
2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the
Industrial Dispute between the management of Dalurband
Colliery, M/s. Eastern Coalfields Ltd. and their workmen,
received by the Central Government on 10-7-2013.
[No. L- 22012/137/2003-IR (CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
ASANSOL
Present : SRI JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer,
Reference No. 18 of 2004
Parties :
The management of Dalurband
Colliery of M/s. ECL, Burdwan
Vs.
The Gen.Secy., KMC, Asansol,
Burdwan (WB)
Representatives :
For the Management
:
Sh. P. K. Das,
Ld. Advocates.
For the Union (Workman)
:
Sri S. K. Pandey,
Ld. Representative
Industry : Coal
State : West Bengal
Dated : 17-4-2013
AWARD
In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-
section (1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), Govt. of India
through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L-22012/
137/2003-IR.(CM-II) dated 25.02.2004 has been pleased to
refer the following dispute for adjudication by this
Tribunal.
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of
Dalurband Colliery under Pandaveshwar Area of
M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited in dismissing Sri
Lachman Bhuiya, U.G. Loader from service vide letter
no. DC/589 dated 18/20.5.99 is legal and justified? lf
not, to what relief he is entitled to?”
(1) Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/
137/2003-IR (CM-II) dated 25.02.2004 of the above said
reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New
Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference case No.
18 of 2004 was regitered on 22.03.04 and accordingly an
order to that effect was passed to issue notices through
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4183
the registered post to the parties concerned directing them
to appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their
written statements along with the relevant documents and
a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance
of the said order notices by the registered post were sent
to the parties concerned. Sri P. K. Das, Advocate and
Sri S. K. Pandey, General Secretary of the union appeared
in the Court to represent the management and the Union
respectively. The written statement on behalf of both the
parties were filed in support of their respective claims.
(2) In brief compass the case of the union as set
forth in its written statement is that Sh. Lachman Bhuiya
was the permanent employee of the company as Under
Ground Loader at Dalurband Colliery, Pandaveshwar Area
of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited. The main case of the
union is that he absented from his duty w.e.f. 18-12-98 and
that due to sickness and being declared fit the workman
reported to the management but he was not allowed to
resume his duty. The workman was simply informed that
his service have been terminated. It is also the case of the
union that in spite of the fact that the workman kept
informed to the management about his sickness even then
he was charge sheeted for alleged unauthorized absence
from duty. The workman was not served with the copy of
the charge sheet, notice of enquiry etc. as such the
principles of natural justice was denied to him and the
dismissal of the workman concerned from the service of
the company is illegal and unjustified. A relief for his
reinstatement in his service with all consequential benefits
arising there from with effect from the date of his dismissal
has been sought for.
(3) On the other hand the defence case of the
management as per the averments of the pleadings in short
is that Lachman Bhuiya of Dalurband Colliery had absented
from his duties since 18-12-98 without any permission or
even information to the competent authority. The further
case of the management is that the workman concerned
had not been very regular in attending his duties to inspire
confidence of the management for which the employer
issued to him the charge sheet dated 8-1-99 for habitual
absenteeism but Sh. Bhuiya did not give any reply to the
said charge sheet. Subsequently an Enquiry Officer was
appointed to conduct the domestic enquiry.
(4) It is also the defence case of the management
that three notices had been served fixing different date at
regular interval to the home address of the workman but
no response was received and ultimately ex-parte enquiry
was conducted, so the enquiry proceeding should be
deemed to be conducted in compliance of the natural
justice. The enquiry officer is claimed to have hold the
workman guilty for the charges established and on that
account having considered the gravit of the charges and
the misconduct the workman was dismissed from his
service on 18-5-99. The management has claimed the
dismissal order of the workman to be fair and proper and
the workman is not entitled to any relief.
(5) Earlier the Presiding Officer Md. Sarfaraz Khan
has passed “Award” dated 18-7-2007 by which the Learned
Presiding Officer has been pleased to uphold the
punishment against the workman Lachman Bhuiya by
Award dated 18-7-2007.
(6) The workman has filed one writ (W.P. 663 of
2008) before the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. The
Hon’ble Court by its judgement dated 14th June, 2010
have been pleased to set aside the part of the order
regarding punishment with a direction to this Tribunal to
pass a reasoned order regarding the punishment after
taking into account the principle as started to this duration.
On perusal of the order of his Hon’ble Court in the above
mention writ (W.P. 663 of 2008) passed on 14th June 2010,
I find that the Hon’ble Court have been pleased to
observe :—
“I am not satisfied with the finding regarding
punishment. In 1996 there is absence of 69 days, in
1997 of 50 days and in 1998 of 20 days. Punishment
should be proportionate to the guilt. It should never
be excessive. It ought not to be such as would sound
unreasonable. After all, there is the question of
employment of a workman who is earning income
from that employment of a workman who is earning
income from that employment and maintaining his
family. Dismissal from employment is bound to create
great financial hardship to him and his family. In
some cases, this hardship becomes permanent
because of unavailability of alternative employment”.
(7) On behalf of the union on decision of the
Hon’ble Apex Court reported in 2012 (135) F.L.R. 743 [Civil
Appeal No. 4221 of 2011 — Rajasthan Tourism
Development Corporation Limited & another Vrs. Jai Raj
Singh Chouhan] has been filed, and from perusal of the
present ruling of the Hon’ble Apex Court, I find that the
Hon’ble Apex Court has also of the view that on the ground
of remaining absent beyond the period of Leave - dismissal
from service is not proper and against the “Natural Justice”.
(8) Hence considering the observable made by the
Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta, referred above, and keep in
mind the decision of the Hon’ble Apex Court, I am of the
opinion that not only on the ground of above absent for
same period (69 days in 1996, 50 days in 1997 and 20 days
in 1998) the Management should not throw the employee
on the street for purpose of begging with his all family
members by dismissing him from service, and it seems to
be against the principle of “Natural Justice”. But the
negligence on the past of workman shows that it caused
hamper in production work for which the workman is liable
for some punishment.
(9) Accordingly the action of the Management of
Dalurband Colliery under Pandeveswar Area of M/s. ECL
in dismissing Sri Lachman Bhuiya, U.G. Loader from service
vide Letter No. DC/589 dated 18/20-5-99 is in my opinion is
not legal and justified, and the order of dismissal passed
4184
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
by the Management is hereby set aside. The Management
is directed to reinstate the workman Dular Chand Bhuiya,
U.G. Loader from the date of dismissal 18/20-5-99 with
stoppage of two increment and withheld of 50% back
wages, and of accordingly “Award” be issued.
ORDER
Let an “Award” be and the same is passed as per
above. Send the copies of the “Award” to the Government
of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment, New Delhi for
information and needful.
JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 10 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1598-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZlh,y
ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vlulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k
28@2012) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 10&7&2013
dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y&22012@70@2012&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 10th July, 2013
S.O. 1598.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 28/
2012) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the
Industrial Dispute between the management of J. K. Nagar
Colliery Satgram Area, M/s. E.C. Ltd. and their workmen,
received by the Central Government on 10-7-2013.
[No. L- 22012/70/2012-IR (CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
ASANSOL
Present : Sri Jayanta Kumar Sen, Presiding Officer
Reference No. 28 of 2012
Parties :
The management of J. K. Nagar
Colliery, Satgram Area of M/s. ECL,
Burdwan
Vs.
Sri D. K. Routh, Branch Jt. Secy.,
CMC(HMS), Asansol, Burdwan (WB)
Representatives :
For the Management
:
None
For the Union (Workman)
:
None
Industry : Coal
State : West Bengal
Dated : 16-5-2013
AWARD
In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-
section (1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), Govt. of India
through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L-22012/
70/2012-IR(CM-II) dated 18.5.2012 has been pleased to refer
the following dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal.
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of J. K.
Nagar Colliery of M/s. ECL. in not payment HRA @
10% of Basic Pay to Sri Ramachandra Ram Dusadh
is fair and justified? To what relief the concerned
workman is entitled to?”
Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/70/
2012-IR (CM-II) dated 18.05.2012 of the above said
reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New
Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference case No.
28 of 2012 was registered on 25.06.2012 and accordingly
an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through
the registered post to the parties concerned directing them
to appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their
written statements alongwith the relevant documents and
a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance
of the said order notices by the registered post were sent
to the parties concerned.
On perusal of the case record, it has been found that
Sri D. K. Routh, Branch Jt. Secretary of the Union, submits
that the workman is now not interested to proceed with
the case and further prayed for the closure of the case.
Since the workman is not interested to proceed with the
case, the case is closed and accordingly an order of “No
Dispute” award is hereby passed.
ORDER
Let an “Award” be and the same is passed as “No
Dispute” existing. Send the copies of the order to the Govt.
of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for needful
information. The reference is accordingly disposed of.
JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 10 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1599-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZlh,y
ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k
38@2003) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 10&7&2013
dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y&22012@300@2002&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4185
New Delhi, the 10th July, 2013
S.O. 1599.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 38/
2003) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the
Industrial Dispute between the management of M/s.
Eastern Coalfields Ltd., and their workmen, received by
the Central Government on 10-7-2013.
[No. L- 22012/300/2002-IR (CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
ASANSOL
Present : Sri Jayanta Kumar Sen, Presiding Officer
Reference No. 38 of 2003
Parties :
The management of Chapuikhas
Colliery of M/s. ECL, Burdwan
Vs.
The Gen.Secy., KMC, Asansol (WB)
Representatives :
For the Management
:
Sh. P. K. Das,
Ld. Advocate.
For the Union (Workman)
:
Sri S. K. Pandey,
Ld. Representative
Industry : Coal
State : West Bengal
Dated : 15-03-2013
AWARD
In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-
section (1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), Govt. of India
through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L-22012/
300/2002-IR(CM-II) dated 16.10.2003 has been pleased to
refer the following dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal.
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of
Chapuikhas in dismissing Sri Lala Bouri, Underground
Loader from service is legal and justified? If not, to what
relief the workman is entitled?”
Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/
300/2002-IR(CM-II) dated 16.10.2003 of the above said
reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour,
New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference case
No. 38 of 2003 was registered on 04.11.2003 and accordingly
an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through
the registered post to the parties concerned directing them
to appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their
written statements along with the relevant documents and
a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance
of the said order notices by the registered post were sent
to the parties concerned.
It appears from the Enquiry Report as well as record
that the workman Lala Bouri, Underground Loader was
dismissed from service due to unauthorized absent only
for Five months i.e. from 02.09.99 to 16.02.2000. It appears
from the Enquiry Report that on 02.09.99 the workman
Lala Bouri felt chest pain and he rushed to Sub-Divisional
Hospital, Asansol, for treatment. The Enquiry Officer
discarded the plea of workman on the ground that he did
not approach the ECL Doctor for treatment nor inform the
Management regarding such illness. It appears from the
record that the workman Lala Bouri was also treated by
the doctor of Central Institute of Psychiatry, Ranchi-
Photocopy of Discharge Certificate filed.
Since the workman Lala Bouri absented from duty
only for Five months due to his illness, so in my opinion
the action of the Management against Lala Bouri is very
harsh, because it appears that he was ill at that time. The
only fault of the workman is that he did not go to ECL
Hospital for treatment and did not inform the Management
regarding his illness in time. But only on this ground the
Management should not award death penalty to the
workman by dismissing him from service and throw all the
family members on street for begging which is against the
provision of “Natural Justice”.
Hence the action of the Management of Chapuikhas
Colliery in dismissing Lala Bouri, Underground Loader
from service is, in my opinion, totally illegal and unjustified.
Accordingly the Order of dismissal is hereby set
aside. The Management is directed to allow the workman
Lala Bouri to join in the service with 75 percentage of back
wages within three months from the date of Notification.
ORDER
Let an “Award” be and the same is passed as per
above discussion. Send the copies of the order to the
Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for
information and needful. The reference is accordingly
disposed of.
JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 10 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1600-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZlh,y
ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k
44@2006) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 10&7&2013
dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y&22012@244@2005&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
4186
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
New Delhi, the 10th July, 2013
S.O. 1600.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 44/
2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the
Industrial Dispute between the management of North
Searsole Colliery of M/s. E.C. L. and their workmen, received
by the Central Government on 10-7-2013.
[No. L- 22012/244/2005-IR (CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
ASANSOL
Present : SRI JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer,
Reference No. 44 of 2006
Parties :
The management of North Searsole
Colliery of M/s. ECL, Burdwan
Vs.
The Org. Secy., CRMS (BMM),
Burdwan (WB)
Representatives :
For the Management
:
Sh. P. K. Goswami,
Ld. Advocate.
For the Union (Workman)
:
Sri M. K. Bandopadhaya,
Ld. Representative
Industry : Coal
State : West Bengal
Dated : 07-05-2013
AWARD
In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-
section (1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), Govt. of India
through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L-22012/
244/2005-IR(CM-II) dated 02.08.2006 has been pleased to
refer the following dispute for adjudication by this
Tribunal.
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of North
Searsole Colliery under Kunustoria Area of M/s. E.
C. Ltd. in dismissing Sri Ramdaras Harijan, U.G.
Loader w.e.f. 10.07.2001 is justified? If not, to what
relief is the workman entitled?”
Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/
244/2005-IR (CM-II) dated 02.08.2006 of the above said
reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New
Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference case No.
44 of 2006 was registered on 14.08.2006 and accordingly
an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through
the registered post to the parties concerned directing them
to appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their
written statements along with the relevant documents and
a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance
of the said order notices by the registered post were sent
to the parties concerned.
It is an admitted fact that the workman remained
absent from his duty from 26.08.2001 to 25.02.2001 and he
did not inform the Management about this absence (Para
3 and 4 of affidavit). Regarding treatment the workman
produce a photocopy of Medical Certificate granted by
one Dr. S.K. Mukherjee, a private homeopathic doctor,
from which it appears that the workman was suffering from
Mental depression. The workman never treated himself
by any Colliery Central Hospital where there are sufficient
amenities and there are number of experienced Doctors.
Moreover, the Dr. S.K. Mukherjee also did not turn up for
evidence to support the fact that he treated the workman
as well as to prove the Medical Certificate granted by him.
So in my opinion much reliance cannot be given on this
very Medical Certificate. It further appears from the record
that on 25.02.2001 after found him find long absent without
any information, he (workman) was charge-sheeted under
Ref. ECL/NS/P&I R/3478 dated 25.02.2001, and as because
the workman did not appear to face the enquiry even after
notice, as exparte enquiry was held and he was found
guilty as per charge-sheet and accordingly his service
was terminated on 01.07.2001. I am surprised to see that
the workman did not take any action soon after his
dismissal and remain idle for more than three years, and all
of a sudden the Union raised the dispute on 10.11.2004.
No cogent reason has been assigned by the Union
regarding such delay in raising the dispute. Moreover, I
find that the workman in his affidavit (examination-in-chief)
has also not stated about any cogent reason for not taking
any steps soon after the knowledge of dismissal rather
slept for more than three years.
Further from the cross-examination of the workman
(Para 13, dt. 09.09.2001) I find that the workman has already
come his age of superannuation in the month of April,
2010.
Considering the whole fact circumstances of the case
as well as the evidence of the workman and the document
filed on his behalf, keeping in view the long delay (more
than three years) in raising the dispute, I am of the opinion
that the workman has failed to prove his claim before this
Tribunal beyond all shadows of reasonable doubts. And
in my opinion the workman Ramdaras Harijan is not entitled
to get any relief as prayed. However, the workman is entitled
to get his dues which he would be entitled after normal
superannuation, to save his family members from
starvation keeping in view the provision of “Natural
Justice.”
ORDER
Let an “Award” be and the same is passed as per
above discussion. Send the copies of the order to the
Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for
information and needful. The reference is accordingly
disposed of.
JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4187
ubZ fnYyh] 10 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1601-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ lh
,y ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k
92@2005) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks
10&07&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y&22012@335@2004&vkbZ vkj (lh ,e&2)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 10th July, 2013
S.O. 1601.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 92/
2005) of the Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial
dispute between the management of M/s. Eastern
Coalfields Limited, and their workmen, received by the
Central Government on 10-07-2013.
[ No. L- 22012/335/2004-IR (CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL
TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL
PRESENT :
SRI JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer.
Reference No. 92 of 2005
PARTIES :
The management of Kuardih Colliery of M/s. ECL,
Burdwan.
Vs.
The Org. Secy., CRMS, Bidhanbag, Burdwan (W.B.)
REPRESENTATIVES :
For the Management
: None.
For the Union (Workman)
: None.
Industry : Coal
State : West Bengal
Dated 28-05-2013
AWARD
In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-
section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), Govt. of India
through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No.
L-22012/335/2004-IR (CM-II) dated 4-8-2005 has been
pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by
this Tribunal.
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of ECL in
denying employment in respect of Shri Gurucharan
Prasad Koiri, dependant son of Late Kashi Prasad
Koiri of Kuardih Colliery is legal and justified ? If not,
to what relief Shri Gurucharan Prasad Koiri is
entitled ?”
Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/
335/2004-IR (CM-II) dated 4-8-2005 of the above said
reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour,
New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference case
No. 92 of 2005 was registered on 17-8-2005 and accordingly
an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through
the registered post to the parties concerned directing them
to appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their
written statements along with the relevant documents
and a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In
pursuance of the said order notices by the registered post
were sent to the parties concerned.
On perusal of the case record, it has found that the
workman is neither appearing nor taking any step since
5-3-2012. Several opportunities were given but of no effect.
It seems that the workman is now not interested to proceed
with the case any further. Since the workman is not
interested to proceed with the case, the case is closed and
accordingly an order of “ No Dispute” award is hereby
passed.
ORDER
Let an “Award” be and the same is passed as “No
Dispute” existing. Send the copies of the order to the Govt.
of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for needful
information. The reference is accordingly disposed of.
JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 10 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1602-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ lh
,y ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k
71@2006) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks
10&07&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y&22012@296@2005&vkbZ vkj (lh ,e&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
4188
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
New Delhi, the 10th July, 2013
S.O. 1602.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 71/
2006) of the Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial
dispute between the management of Bankola Area of
M/s. Eastern Coalfileds Limited, and their workmen,
received by the Central Government on 10-07-2013.
[No. L- 22012/296/2005-IR (CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL
TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL
PRESENT :
SRI JYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer.
Reference No. 71 of 2006
PARTIES :
The management of Kunardihi B. Colliery of M/s.
ECL, Burdwan.
Vs.
The Org. Secy., CRMS (BMM), Burdwan (W.B.)
REPRESENTATIVES :
For the Management
: Shri P. K. Goswami,
Ld. Advocate.
For the Union (Workman)
: Shri
M.
K.
Bandopadhaya, Ld.
Representative.
Industry : Coal
State : West Bengal
Dated 20-05-2013
AWARD
In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-
section (1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), Govt. of India
through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No.
L-22012/296/2005-IR (CM-II) dated 6-10-2006 has been
pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by
this Tribunal.
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of Kumardihi
‘B’ Colliery under Bankola Area of M/s. Eastern
Coalfilds Limited in denying employment to the
dependant of Late Basu Bhuiya, Underground
Loader is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief
the depandent of the deceased workman is
entitled ?”
Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012296/
2005-IR (CM-II) dated 6-10-2006 of the above said reference
from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for
adjudication of the dispute, a reference case No. 71 of
2006 was registered on 31-10-2006 and accordingly an order
to that effect was passed to issue notices through the
registered post to the parties concerned directing them to
appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their written
statements along with the relevant documents and a list
of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance of
the said or er notices by the registered post were sent to
the parties concerned.
From perusal of the written statement of the
Management dated 16-1-2002 (Para 2) I find that it is an
admitted fact that Basu Bhuiya (deceased) was an
employee of Kumardihi ‘‘B’’ Colliery having U.M. No.
616592 has been suffering from incurable disease and he
got admitted at Central hospital Kalla on 2-3-1998 for
treatment but he could not survive and died on 15-3-1998.
Photocopy of Medical treatment as well as Death
Certificate granted by Central Hospital Kalla, Asansol and
ECL are filed on behalf of the claimant (dependant). Further
from the photocopy of the order of Chief General Manager,
Bankola Area under ECL dated 23-8-1997 Ref. No. BA/PD/
Dis/98/906, it is apparently clear that the Management has
dismissed the deceased Basu Bhuiya on 17-3-1998 that is
after his death. Further I find that the Management to
save their skin put the date ‘‘13’’ befre ‘‘17’’ to avoid any
claim of the dependant deceased which, any my opinion,
is not fair and against the ‘‘Natural Justice’’. In my opinion
Jago Bhuiya the son of the Late Basu Bhuiya has every
right to claim for job on compassionate ground due to
death of his father Basu Bhuiya.
Accordingly in my opinion the action of the
Managemen of Kumardihi ‘B’ Colliery under Bankola Area
of M/s. ECL in denying employment to Jago Bhuiya the
dependant of Late Basu Bhuiya is illegal and unjustified,
and accordingly the same is set aside. The Management
is directed to give employment to Jago Bhuiya dependant
of Late Basu Bhuiya within two months from the date of
receipt of the Award.
ORDER
Let an “Award” be and the same is passed as per
above discussion. Send the copies of the order to the Govt.
of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for information and
needful. The reference is accordingly disposed of.
JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 10 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1603-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ lh
,y ds çca/ra=k ds laca¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4189
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k
29@2002) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks
10&07&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹iQk- la- ,y&22012@339@2001&vkbZ vkj (lh ,e&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 10th July, 2013
S.O. 1603.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 29/2002)
of the Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,
Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial
dispute between the management of Bejdih Colliery, M/s.
Eastern Coalfields Limited, and their workmen, received
by the Central Government on 10-07-2013.
[ F. No. L- 22012/339/2001-IR (CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL
TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL
PRESENT :
Sri Jyanta Kumar Sen, Presiding Officer.
Reference No. 29 of 2002
PARTIES :
The management of Bejdih Colliery of. M/s. ECL,
Burdwan.
Vs.
Shri Jawahar Singh, Vice President, CMU (INTUC),
Asansol (WB).
REPRESENTATIVES :
For the Management
: Shri P. K. Goswami,
Ld. Advocate.
For the Union (Workman)
: None
Industry : COAL
State : West Bengal
Dated 14-05-2013
AWARD
In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-
section (1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), Govt. of India
through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No.
L-22012/339/2001-IR (CM-II) dated 14-8-2002 has been
pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by
this Tribunal.
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of Bejdih
Colliery under Sodapur Area of M/s. EC Ltd. in
dismissing Shri Sadhu Paswan, U.G. Loader from
service w.e.f. 1-6-1996 is justified ? If not
to what relief is the workman entitled ?”
Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/
339/2001-IR (CM-II) dated 14-08-2002 of the above said
reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour,
New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference case
No. 29 of 2002 was registered on 10-9-2002 and accordingly
an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through
the registered post to the parties concerned directing them
to appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their
written statements along with the relevant documents
and a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In
pursuance of the said order notices by the registered post
were sent to the parties concerned.
On perusal of the case record, it has found that the
workman is neither appearing nor taking any step since
2007. It seems that the workman is now not interested to
proceed with the case any further. Several opportunities
were given but of no effect. Since the workman is not
interested to proceed with the case, the case is closed and
accordingly an order of “ No Dispute” award is hereby
passed.
ORDER
Let an “Award” be and the same is passed as “No
Dispute” existing. Send the copies of the order to the Govt.
of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for needful
information. The reference is accordingly disposed of.
JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 10 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1604-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ lh
,y ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k
17@2012) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks
10&07&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹iQk- la- ,y&22012@30@2012&vkbZ vkj (lh ,e&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 10th July, 2013
S.O. 1604.—In pursuanceof Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 17/2012)
of the Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,
4190
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial
dispute between the management of M/s. J. K. Nagar
Colliery, M/s. E.C. Ltd., and their workmen, received by
the Central Government on 10-07-2013.
[ F. No. L- 22012/30/2012-IR (CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL
TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL
PRESENT :
Sri Jyanta Kumar Sen, Presiding Officer.
Reference No. 17 of 2012
PARTIES :
The management of J. K. Nagar Colliery, Satgram
Area of M/s. ECL, Burdwan.
Vs.
Sri D. K. Routh, Branch Jt. Secy., CMC (HMS),
Anansol, Burdwan (W.B.)
REPRESENTATIVES :
For the Management
: P. K. Goswami, Ld.
Advocate.
For the Union (Workman)
: None
Industry : COAL
State : West Bengal
Dated 25-4-2013
AWARD
In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-
section (1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), Govt. of India
through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No.
L-22012/30/2012-IR (CM-II) dated 19-4-2012 has been
pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by
this Tribunal.
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of J. K.
Nagar Colliery of M/s. ECL in not payment HRA @
10% of Basic Pay to Sri Samsuddin Mia is fair and
Justifed ? To what relief the concerned workman is
is entitled to ?”
Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/30/
2012-IR (CM-II) dated 19-4-2012 of the above said reference
from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour,
New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference case
No. 17 of 2012 was registered on 8-5-2012 and accordingly
an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through
the registered post to the parties concerned directing them
to appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their
written statements along with the relevant documents
and a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In
pursuance of the said order notices by the registered post
were sent to the parties concerned.
On perusal of the case record, it has found that Sri
D. K. Routh, Branch Jt. Secretary of the Union, submits
that the workman is not interested to proceed with the
case and further prayed for the closure of the case. Since
the workman is not interested to proceed with the case,
the case is closed and accordingly an order of “ No
Dispute” award is hereby passed.
ORDER
Let an “Award” be and the same is passed as “No
Dispute” existing. Send the copies of the order to the Govt.
of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for needful
information. The reference is accordingly disposed of.
JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 10 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1605-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ lh
,y ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k
18@2012) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks
10&07&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹iQk- la- ,y&22012@25@2012&vkbZ vkj (lh ,e&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 10th July, 2013
S.O. 1605.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 18/2012)
of the Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,
Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial
dispute between the management of M/s. J. K. Nagar
Colliery, M/s. E.C. Ltd., and their workmen, received by
the Central Government on 10-07-2013.
[ F. No. L- 22012/25/2012-IR (CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL
TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL
PRESENT :
Sri Jyanta Kumar Sen, Presiding Officer.
Reference No. 18 of 2012
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4191
PARTIES :
The management of J. K. Nagar Colliery, Satgram
Area of M/s. ECL, Burdwan.
Vs.
Sri D. K. Routh, Branch Jt. Secy., CMC (HMS),
Anansol, Burdwan (W.B.)
REPRESENTATIVES :
For the Management
: Sri P. K. Goswami,
Ld. Advocate.
For the Union (Workman)
: None
Industry : Coal
State : West Bengal
Dated 25-4-2013
AWARD
In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-
section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), Govt. of India
through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No.
L-22012/25/2012-IR (CM-II) dated 19-4-2012 has been
pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by
this Tribunal.
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of J. K.
Nagar Colliery of M/s. ECL in not payment HRA @
10% of Basic Pay to Sri Sheopujan Thakur is while
he was working at the J. K. Nagar Colliery, Raniganj
is fair and justified ? To what relief the concerned
workman is entitled to ?”
Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/25/
2012-IR (CM-II) dated 19-4-2012 of the above said reference
from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour,
New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference case
No. 18 of 2012 was registered on 8-5-2012 and accordingly
an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through
the registered post to the parties concerned directing them
to appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their
written statements along with the relevant documents
and a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In
pursuance of the said order notices by the registered post
were sent to the parties concerned.
On perusal of the case record, it has been found that
Sri D. K. Routh, Branch Jt. Secretary of the Union, submits
that the workman is not interested to proceed with the
case and further prayed for the closure of the case. Since
the workman is not interested to proceed with the case,
the case is closed and accordingly an order of “No
Dispute” award is hereby passed.
ORDER
Let an “Award” be and the same is passed as “No
Dispute” existing. Send the copies of the order to the Govt.
of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for needful
information. The reference is accordingly disposed of.
JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 10 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1606-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ lh
,y ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k
27@2009) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks
10&07&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y&22012@44@2009&vkbZ vkj (lh ,e&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 10th July, 2013
S.O. 1606.—In exercise of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 27/
2009 of the Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Anansol as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial
dispute between the management of Pandaveshwar Area
of M/s. EC L, and their workmen, received by the Central
Government on 10-07-2013.
[ No. L- 22012/44/2009-IR (CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL
TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL
PRESENT :
SRI JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer.
Reference No. 27 of 2009
PARTIES :
The management of Pandaveshwar Area of
M/s. ECL, Burdwan.
Vs.
The General Secy., UCMU, Khandra, Burdwan
(W.B.)
4192
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
REPRESENTATIVES :
For the Management
: Sri P. K. Goswami,
Ld. Advocate.
For the Union (Workman)
: G. P. Mal, Ld.
Advocate.
Industry : Coal
State : West Bengal
Dated 7-5-2013
AWARD
In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-
section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), Govt. of India
through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No.
L-22012/44/2009-IR (CM-II) dated 10-11-2009 has been
pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by
this Tribunal.
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of
M/s. ECL, in not providing employment to Shri
Kuntial Mukherjee, the dependant son of the
deceased workman Shri Bimalendu Mukherjee is
legal and justifed ? To what relief is the claimant
entitled for ?’’
Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/44/
2009-IR (CM-II) dated 10-11-2009 of the above said
reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour,
New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference case
No. 27 of 2009 was registered on 30-11-2009 and
accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue
notices through the registered post to the parties
concerned directing them to appear in the court on the
date fixed and to file their written statements along with
the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support
of their claims. In pursuance of the said order notices by
the registered post were sent to the parties concerned.
On perusal of the case record, it has found that Sri G.
P. Mal, Ld. Advocate for the workman, files an affidavit of
Smt. Mina Rani Mukherjee, member of Sri Kuntial
Mukherjee praying for dismissing the case. Since the
workman wants to withdraw the case, the case is closed
and accordingly an order of “ No Dispute” award is hereby
passed.
ORDER
Let an “Award” be and the same is passed as “No
Dispute” existing. Send the copies of the order to the Govt.
of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for needful
information. The reference is accordingly disposed of.
JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 10 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1607-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ ,iQ lh
vkbZ ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- 2] p.Mhx<+ ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k
87@2005) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks
10&07&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y&22012@158@2004&vkbZ vkj (lh ,e&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 10th July, 2013
S.O. 1607.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 87/
2005) of the Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court No. 2, Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure, in the
industrial dispute between the management of Food
Corporation of India, and their workmen, received by the
Central Government on 10-07-2013.
[No. L- 22012/158/2004-IR (CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNNEXURE
IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL
IRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT-II, CHANDIGARH
PRESENT :
SRI A. K. RASTOGI, Presiding Officer.
Case No. I.D. No. 87/2005
Registered on 19-4-2005
Sh. Mangej Singh, S/o Sh. Manga Ram, Gali No. 9,
Samad Road, Near Govt. Primary School, Sunam.
. . . Petitioner
Versus
Sr. Regional Manager, Food Corporation of India,
Sector 34-A, Chandigarh.
. . . Respondents
APPEARANCES :
For the workman
:
Sh. Sarabjit A. R.
For the Management
:
Sh. Santokh Singh,
Advocate.
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4193
AWARD
Passed on 11-4-2013
Central, Government vide Notification No. L-22012/
158/2004-IR (CM-II) dated 30-3-2005, by exercising its
powers under Section 10 Sub-section (1) Clause (d) and
Sub-section (2-A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
(hereinafter referred to as ‘Act’) has referred the following
Industrial dispute for adjudication to the Tribunal :—
“Whether the action of the management of Food
Corporation of India, Chandigarh in terminating the
services of Sh. Mangej , Singh, Watchman/Chowkidar
is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman
is entitled ?’’
‘
According to the claim statement the workman had
worked with FCI as Chowkidar from 15-5-1979 to 31-3-1980
continuously. But his services were terminated on 1-4-1980
without any notice, inquiry, charge-sheet or compensation.
It has also been alleged that ,the juniors of the workman
are still in service and new hands had been employed after
his termination. He claimed his reinstatement with
continuity of service and back wages.
Claim was contested by the management., It was
denied that the workman ever worked in FCI and he was
the appointee of the management. And since he was not an
employee of the management hence, ,the question of
termination of his service by the management does not
arise and nor does arise the question of retaining the juniors
or employing fresh hands. According to the management
the claim is frivolous and deserves to be dismissed.
In evidence the workman fiied his affidavit and gave
his statement. He also filed photocopies of two documents
marked ‘A’ and ‘B’. While on behalf of the management
affidavit was filed by Mahender Singh, Area Manager who
gave his statement also.
It may be mentioned that on the application of the
workman for summoning the record he had been directed
to assist the management in locating the record vide order
dated 14-3-2006. Consequently he had searched for the
record in presence of the official of the management but
the record could not be traced out and the workman certified
this fact under his hand. The fact is mentioned in order
dated 2-5-2006. The workman however had been given the
liberty to prove his case by any other mode including
secondary evidence. Consequently he filed photocopies
marked as ‘A’ and ‘B’.
None appeared for workman for arguing, the. case
despite several opportunities given to him for the purpose.
I therefore heard the learned counsel for the management
and perused the eyidence on record.
The photocopy Mark ‘A’ filed by the workman
purports to be a letter written by Assistant District Manager
Sangrur verifying. the attendance of workers. In this letter
workman has been shown to have worked for 108 days in
the year 1979 to 1980. Mark ‘B’ is a list regarding Bonus in
which the name of the workman appears at serial No.19.
The management suggested to the workman during his
cross-examination that they are forged documents. The
management-witness could not comment on these
documents in the absence of originals. The workman has
not stated from where and how he got the photocopies. He
did not produce the person. who had supplied the copies.
The genuineness of ‘A’ and ‘B’ therefore cannot be
accepted.
The learned counsel for the management argued that
it is clear from the statement of the workman that he neither
possessed the appointment letter no rtermination order.
As per his statement he had not been issued any salary
slip also and there is nothing in his evidence to show that
he had been appointed by the management or he was in
the employment of the management.
It may be noted that even if the document Mark ‘A’
relied on by the workman are believed then he only worked
for 108 days during 1979-1980 the alleged period of his
employment. Therefore in no way he is entitled to the
protection of Section 25F of the Act.
The workman has further failed to prove that while
terminating his services persons junior to him were retained
or any new hand was employed by the management after
his termination.
Thus there is no reliable evidence to prove that the
workman was in the employment of the management and.
his services were terminated by the management. However
even if the document Mark ‘A’ relied on by him is
considered no case of protection of Section 25F is made
out. Violation of Section 25G and 25H of the Act also is not
proved. It is therefore held that the workman was not in the
employment and his services were not’terminated by the
management and secondly even if for arguments sake his
employment with the management and termination of his
services is accepted then there is no illegality in the alleged
termination. Workman is not entitled to any relief. Reference
,is decided against the workman. Let two copies of the
award be sent to the Central Government for further
necessary action.
ASHOK KUMAR RASTOGI, Presiding Officer
4194
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ubZ fnYyh] 10 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1608-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ ,p ,e
Vh ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] cSaxyksj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 38@2002)
dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 10&7&2013 dks çkIr
gqvk Fkk A
¹iQk- la- ,y&42012@183@2001&vkbZ vkj (lh,e&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 10th July, 2013
S.O. 1608.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Diputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 38/2002)
of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Bangalore as shown in the Annexure, in the
Industrial dispute between the management of Hindustan
Machine Tools Limited and their workmen received by the
Central Government on 10-7-2013.
[F. No. L- 42012/183/2001-IR(CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT,
BANGALORE
Dated : 4th April, 2013
Present : Shri S. N. NA V ALGUND, Presiding Officer
C. R. No. 38/2002
I Party
Sh. S. Kumar,
P P No. 1224, BSA Road,
Periyarnagar,
Bangalore - 560005.
II Party
1. The Chairman and Managing Director,
HMT Limited, HMT Bhavan,
No. 59, Bellary Road.
Bangalore - 560032.
2. M/s. B. M. Enterprises, No. 22.
Vijayanagar Colony, Behind Tin
Factory, Dooravaninagar.
Bangalore - 560 014.
Appearances
I Party
: Sh. K. V. Sathyesh Simha, Advocate
II Party
: Sh. M. M. Cariappa
Advocate for II Party No. 1
Sh. Prakash Rao K.
Advocate for II Party No. 2
AWARD
1.The Central Government by exercising the powers
conferred by Clause (d) of Sub-section (1) of Sub-section
2A of the Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
has referred this dispute vide Order No. L-42012/183/2001-
IR(CM-II) dated 16.07.2002 for adjudication on the
following schedule:
SCHEDULE
‘‘Whether Sh. S. Kumar, former contract workman
under M/s. B.M. Enterprises is justified in claiming
regular alternative employment under the
Management of M/s. HMT Limited in view of his
amputation of the arm due to accident while on duty?
If so, to what relief he is entitled to?’’
2. On receipt of the reference to registering it in
C R 38/2002, when the notices were issued to I Party and II
Party No.1 and 2 all entered their appearances through
their respective advocates and the I party filed his claim
statement on 13-09-2002 and II party No.1 filed its counter
statement on 06-1-2003, whereas II Party No. 2 did not file
counter statement.
3. The I party in his claim state contended that II
Party No. 1 is a Public Sector Undertaking having its Units
all over India carrying different types of manufacturing
activities with its Head Office at Bangalore and that he
has been working as a Helper in its Printing Centre at
Bangalore since 1984 assisting in the work of Printing/
Binding, cutting which are perennial in nature but the II
Party No.1 to shirk its responsibility of providing privileges
and other monetary benefits as per law shown him to be
working under different contractors namely M/s. Kapila
Enterprises from 1984 to 1989, M/s. J P Enterprises from
1989 to 1994 and M/s. B M Enterprises from 1994 to 1999
and the said system being sham cooked up for exploiting
the work force and that he is the employee of the II Party
No. 1/HMT Limited itself. It is further alleged that while he
was working in the Printing Press on 13-8-1997 and was
adjusting the Letter Heads on the cutting machine, the
cutting blade of the machine suddenly came down on his
left wrist and chopped it off and it was due to the fault in
cutting machine and that portion came to be amputed and
his hospitalization and medical expenses were borne by
the II Party No.1 and after his recovery he was taken in
service but from 02-4-1999 abruptly terminated his services
without giving any notice of whatsoever and another
workman has been replaced and he who belongs to Adi
Dravida Community/ Schedule Caste being the only bread
winner of the family comprising of Wife, Children and his
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4195
aged Mother being unable to get any alternative
employment the II Party No.1 be directed to reinstate him
into service. He also stated in Para 7 of the claim statement
that while referring the dispute the government erroneously
referred him as contract workman and that he is in fact the
workman under II Party No.1. Interalia, the II Party No.1 in
its Counter Statement while contending that Sh.S. Kumar/
l Party workman was in the employment of the Contractor
M/s. B M Enterprises and met with an accident due to his
negligence and not by fault in cutting machine and on
Humanitarian ground he was immediately taken to
M/s. Ramaiah Hospital, one of the best hospital in
Bangalore where the Doctors conducted operation and
amputed the wrist of the I party due to gangrene and
though he was covered under ESI special treatment was
provided to him spending Rs. 20,000.00 and besides the
best Medical Treatment an amount of Rs. 50,000 was
collected as donation from HMT Employees and was
deposited in the name of the I Party as fixed deposit to
enable him to collect the interest. Thus, it is contended as
there exist no relationship of Employer and Employee
between II party and I Party there is no Industrial Dispute
between them. It is further contended the contract was
given to M/s. B M Enterprises/II Party No.2 to run its
printing centre for a period of one year from 01-4-1998 to
31-3-1999 and under that contractor I Party was working
as contract employee and on lapse of the contract period
it was terminated by giving one months' notice period as
per the contract agreement vide their Letter No.
GMM(IMG)/PDC/46/98-99 dated 01-3-1999 since there was
no requirement of the said job. It is also further contended
as II Party No.1 is passing through a very critical situation
and is in the process of downsizing the man power to
make the company viable they are not in a position to
provide employment to the I Party.
4. With the above pleadings when the matter came
to be posted for evidence, the learned advocate appearing
for the I party while filing the affidavit of I party reiterating
the claim statement examining him on oath as WW 1 got
exhibited 16 documents Ex W-1 to Ex W-16 the detailed
description of which are narrated in the annexure and also
by filing an affidavit of one V Chandrashekar, Retired
Employee of the HMT examined him on oath as WW 2.
Interalia, the learned advocate appearing for II party No.1
while filing the affidavits of N Jayavelu, Manager, CRB
Division, HMT Machine Tools Limited, Bangalore and V
Mohan, Clerk-cum-Typist examined them as MW 1 and
MW 2 respectively and in the evidence of MW2 got
exhibited six documents as Ex M-1 to Ex M-6 the detailed
description of which are narrated in the annexure.
5. After close of the evidence of both sides when
the matter was posted for arguments, the learned advocate
appearing for the I party urged that I party workman was
not a contract worker at all and he worked in the Printing
Centre run by the II party No.1 for about 20 years and
during discharge of his work his left hand caught in the
cutting machine and came to be amputed as such he is
entitle to continue in service till he attained the age of
superannuation. Interalia, the learned advocate appearing
for the II party No.1 urged that there being no IOTA of
evidence to demonstrate that I party was engaged directly
by the II party No.1 and on the other hand his own
documentary evidence suggest that he was working
through different contract agencies and even as per the
schedule of the reference as well he being described as
contract workman under M/s. B M Enterprises further
asking to adjudicate whether he is justified in claiming
regular alternative employment under M/s. HMT Limited/
II Party No.1 in view of the amputation of arm while on
duty, there is no scope to consider that he is the actual
employee of II party No. 1 and his entitlement of continuing
in service till attaining the age of superannuation.
6. At the outset, I may say without any hesitation
since the schedule for adjudication is as to Whether Sh. S
Kumar former contract workman under M/s. B M
Enterprises is justified in claiming regular alternative
employment under the management of M/s. HMT Limited
in view of the amputation of the arm due to accident while
on duty, the attempt made by the I party through his claim
statement, evidence and the arguments to treat him as the
actual employee engaged by the II party No.1 and to direct
the II party No, 1 to continue his service till he attain the
age of superannuation is a futile attempt being outside the
perview of the reference. Since the reference is whether
the I party workman under M/s, B M Enterprises is justified
in claiming alternative employment under II party No.1
due to loss of arm in accident while on duty, there being
no dispute he having suffered amputation of the left wrist
while on duty in the printing centre belonging the II Party
No. 1 it was for the I party to justify the claim of regular
alternative employment under the II Party No.1, but instead
of making any effort in that regard as already adverted to
by me above he tried to make out a case that he is actually
under the employment of II Party No.1 and he has been
arbitrarily terminated and he be allowed to continue in
service till attaining the age of superannuation which is
altogether outside the scope of this reference. The I party
neither in his claim statement, nor in his evidence brought
on record to convince me or to justify that he is entitled
for regular alternative employment under II Party No.1.
Even his learned advocate failed to bring to my notice any
provision under such circumstance the Principle Employer
is required to provide employment to contractor workman.
If at all the I Party was not satisfied with the schedule of
the reference referring him as contract workman under
M/s. B M Enterprises and his claim is for regular alternative
employment under the management of M/s. HMT Limited
in view of the amputation of his arm in the accident, he
ought to have made a representation to the Ministry/
Referring authority to correct the schedule of the reference
4196
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
by way of corrigendum as expected by him. In the absence
of the I party getting any modification or corrigendum to
the schedule of the reference there is no scope in this
reference to consider him as the actual workman of II party
No.1 and to give him a relief of continuing in service till he
attains the age of superannuation as claimed by him. Under
the circumstances, I arrive at conclusion the I party who
was former contract workman under M/s. B M Enterprises
failed to justify his claim of Regular Alternative Employment
under the management of M/s. HMT Limited/II party No.1
and that he is not entitle for any relief. In the result, I pass
the following Order:
ORDER
The reference is rejected holding that Sh. S Kumar, former
contract workman under M/s. B M Enterprises failed to
justify his claim of Regular Alternative Employment under
the management of M/s. HMT Limted in view of the
amputation of the arm due to accident while on duty and
that he is not entitle for any relief.
(Dictated to UDC, transcribed by him, corrected and signed
by me on 4th April 2013)
S. N. NAVALGUND, Presiding Officer
ANNEXURE - I
Witness examined on behalf of I Party
WW1- Sh. S Kumar, I Party Workman
WW2 - Sh. V Chandrashekar, Retired HMT Employee
Documents exhibited by I Party :
Ex. W-1-
Identity Card issued to I Party by contractor
M/s. Kapilan Enterprises
Ex. W - 2-
2 ESI Cards issued by Contractor M/s. David
Business Services dated 1-5-1992
Ex. W - 3 -
PF Slip for 1995-96 vide A/c No. KN/15471/31
issued by M/s. David Business Services
Ex. W -4 -
Certificate issued by the contractor
M/s. David Business Services dated 30-09-99
certifying I Party workman having worked
with them as Helper under Contract at various
office from 1990 to 1995.
Ex. W - 5-
Application of the 1 Party under the pension
scheme of PFO, countersigned by M/s. David
Business Services dated 2-7-1998
Ex. W-6 -
Certificate issued by M/s. B M Enterprises
dated 25-09-2000 certifying I party having
worked under them as Helper in HMT Printing
Centre from 01-06-1995 to 31-03-1999
Ex. W-7 -
Copy of claim form under ESI signed and
submitted by M/s. B M Enterprises for
accident dated 14-8-1997
Ex.W-8 -
Reply of Second Party No. I dated 25-01-1999
to I Party to his representation dated
24-08-1998
Ex. W-9 -
Reply of Second Party No. I dated 07-06-2000
to I Party to his representation dated
19-02-2000
Ex. W-10-
Reply of Second Party No.1 dated 23.01.2001
to ALC Notice dated 08-01-2001
Ex. W-11-
Copy of the petition U/s 10(1)(C) of ID Act
filed before Chief Labour Commissioner
Ex.W-12-
Notice dated 29-12-2000 issued by Assistant
Labour Commissioner to Second Parties
Ex. W-13 -
Reply to the Notice. issued by HMT Ltd.,
dated 14-05-2001 to Assistant Labour
Commissioner
Ex. W-14-
Report of Conciliation passed by Regional
Labour Commissioner, Bangalore
Ex. W-15-
Book on Dr. S M Patil Biography
Ex. W-16-
Literature including some stationery, calendar
Series
etc., printed at Printing Section
Witness examined on behalf of II Party
MW1-
Sh. N Jayavelu, Manager. CRB Division, HMT
Machine Tools Limited, Bangalore
MW2
Sh. V Mohan, Deputy Manager (Admn).
Documents Exhibited for II Party :
Ex. M-1
Copy of Delivery Voucher No. MAN
(ADM)MTBO 1/05-06 dated 21-03-2006
Ex. M - 2
Copy of Delivery Voucher No. MAN
(ADM)MTB/02/05-06 dated 21-03-2006
Ex. M - 3
Copy of Delivery Voucher No. MAN
(ADM)MTB/03/05-06 dated 21-03-2006
Ex. M - 4
Copy of Letter No. MHTl/V/Printing/Sales
dated April 6, 2006 of HMT Machine Tools
Limited. Kalamassery addressed to HMT
Machine Tools Limited, Bangalore.
Ex. M - 5
Letter of Authorisation dated 15-7-2010.
Ex. M - 6
Copy of letter addressed by II Party No. 1 to
II party No. 2 dated 01.03.1999
ubZ fnYyh] 10 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1609-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkbZ-lh-vkbZ-
lh-vkbZ- cSad fy- ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds
deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh;
ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] t;iqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ
la[;k 122@2005) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks
20&6&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹iQk- la- ,y&12012@36@2005&vkbZ vkj (ch&I)º
lqefr ldykuh] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4197
New Delhi, the 10th July, 2013
S.O. 1609.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Diputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 122/
2005) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Jaipur as shown in the Annexure, in the
Industrial dispute between the management of ICICI Bank
Ltd. and their workman, received by the Central
Government on 20-6-2013.
[No. L- 12012/36/2005-IR(B-I)]
SUMATI SAKLANI, Section Officer
vuqca/
dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;]
t;iqj
lh-th-vkbZ-Vh- izdj.k la- 122@2005
Jh ,u- ds- iqjksfgr] ihBklhu vf/dkjh
jsiQjsUl ua-&,y&12012@36@2005&IR(B-I) fnukad 21&10&2005
Sh. Harsukh Lal Kuhmar, S/o Dhukanlal Kuhmar
21/454, Chopsani Housing Board,
Jodhpur (Rajasthan)
v/s
1. Chieg Executive Officer, I.C.I.C.I. Bank Limited,
I.C.I.C.I. Bank Towers Bandra Kurla Complex,
Mumbai-400051
2. The General Manager (Operation), I.C.I.C.I. Bank
Limited, C-3, Sardar Patel Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur.
3. A.G. M.,I.C.I.C.I. Bank Limited, Jal Jog Circle
Residency Road, Jodhpur.
4. Manager, I.C.I.C.I. Bank Limited, Gandhi Chauk,
Barmer. (After merger I.C.I.C.I. Bank has been
Substituded in place of the Bank of Raj. Ltd., Jaipur)
izkFkhZ dh rjiQ ls % Jh lqjs'k d';i
vizkFkhZ dh rjiQ ls % Jh vkykSd iQrsgiqfj;k
% iapkV %
fnukad % 10&4&2013
1- dsUnzh; ljdkj ds }kjk fuEu fookn vkS|ksfxd fookn
vf/fu;e] 1947 dh /kjk 10 dh mi/kjk ds [k.M (?k) ds
izko/kuksa ds vUrxZr mDr vkns'k ds }kjk U;k;fu.kZ;u gsrq izsf"kr
fd;k x;k Fkk A
D;k egkizca/d (vkijs'ku) vihysV izkf/dkjh nh cSad
vkiQ jktLFkku fy-] dsUnzh; dk;kZy; t;iqj ds }kjk vius deZdkj
Jh gjlq[kyky dqEgkj iq=k Jh /qdu yky dqEgkj DydZ&de&
dSf'k;j&de xkSnke dhij dks vkns'k fnukad 6&4&2004 ds rgr
lsok ls fMLpktZ djuk U;k;ksfpr ,oa fof/ lEer gS \ ;fn ugha rks
deZdkj vius fu;kstd ls fdl jkgr dks ikus dk
vf/dkjh gS\
2- laf{kIr esa rF; bl izdkj gS fd izkFkhZ gjlq[kyky DydZ&
de&dSf'k;j dks vizkFkhZ cSad vkWiQ jktLFkku ds ckM+esj czkUp esa
dk;Zjr jgrs gq, fnukad 19&4&1996 dks vkjksi&i=k fn;k x;k
ftldk tokc mlds }kjk fnukad 2&5&1996 dks izLrqr fd;k x;k A
ftlls lUrq"V u gksus ij cSad izca/u us fnukad 7&2&1997 ds
vkns'k }kjk Jh uUn fd'kksj f=kikBh dks tkap vf/dkjh fu;qDr
fd;k A ckn esa fnukad 14&3&2001 dks Jh nsohflag jktiqjksfgr dks
tkap vf/dkjh cuk;k x;k ftUgksaus ekeys esa tkap dk;Zokgh lEikfnr
dj viuh tkap fjiksVZ vuq'kklukRed izkf/dkjh dks fnukad
26&10&2002 izLrqr dh ftlesa izkFkhZ ds fo#¼ yxk;s x;s dqy nl
vkjksiksa esa ls vkjksi la- 1 ls 5 o 8 dks izekf.kr ik;k rFkk vkjksi
la[;k 6] 7] 9] o 10 dks vizekf.kr ik;k A bl izdkj tkap
vfèkdkjh us izkFkhZ dks f}i{kh; le>kSrk ds iSjk la[;k 19&5&C, E,
G, J rFkk iSjk la[;k 19&7] J, K esa of.kZr ?kksj vopkj o y?kq
vopkj dk nks"kh ik;k A
3- tkap vf/dkjh ds mDr fu"d"kZ ds vk/kj ij vuq'kklfud
izkf/dkjh us vkns'k fnukad 25&11&2003 }kjk izkFkhZ ij vfoyEc
fcuk lwpuk ds cSad dh lsok ls c[kkZLr djus dk n.M vkjksfir
fd;k A vkns'k ds fo#¼ foHkkxh; vihyh; izkf/dkjh ds le{k
izLrqr vihy esa vuq'kklfud izkf/dkjh }kjk izkFkhZ ij vkjksfir
n.M dks la'kksf/r djrs gq, izkFkhZ dks lsok ifjykHkksa dks nsrs gq, lsok
ls gVk;s tkus ds n.M ls nf.Mr fd;k A
4- izkFkh }kjk le>kSrk vf/dkjh ds le{k izLrqr fookn esa
okrkZ foiQy jgus ij mDr fookn dks fnukad 21&10&2005 dks
dsUnzh; ljdkj }kjk U;k;fu.kZ;u gsrq funsZ'k (Reference) fd;k
x;k A
5- izkFkhZ us Dyse LVsVesUV esa vfHkdfFkr fd;k gS fd mls
vius cpko gsrq i;kZIr ekSdk ugha fn;k] vko';d nLrkost miyC/
ugha djk;s ,oa lk{khx.k ls izfrijh{kk dk i;kZIr volj ugha fn;k
blfy, tkap uSlfxZd U;k; ds fl¼karksa dh vogsyuk ds dkj.k
Ítq ugha Fkh A izkFkhZ us ;g Hkh vfHkdfFkr fd;k gS fd tkap
vf/dkjh us ftu vkjksiksa dks fl¼ ik;k gS] muds lEcU/ esa tkap
vf/dkjh ds fu"d"kZ =kqfViw.kZ (pervese) gS] D;ksfd tkap ds nkSjku
vfHkys[k ij vkbZ ekSf[kd o izys[kh; lk{; ls izkFkhZ ds fo#¼ dksbZ
vkjksi ugha curk A
6- izkFkhZ ds ;g Hkh vfHkdfFkr fd;k gS fd mlds }kjk izLrqr
fyf[kr cgl ij fopkj fd;s fcuk gh vihyh; izkf/dkjh us tkap
vf/dkjh o vuq'kklfud izkf/dkjh ds fu"d"kZ ls lgefr trkrs
gq, vuq'kklfud izkf/dkjh }kjk izkFkhZ ij vkjksfir n.M dks
la'kksf/r djrs gq, lsok ifjykHkksa dks nsrs gq, lsok ls gVk;s tkus ds
n.M ls nf.Mr fd;k gS A izkFkhZ ds fo#¼ tks vkjksi yxs gSa os y?kq
izd`fr ds gS ftlds fy, lsok eqfDr tSlk dBksj n.M ugha fn;k tk
ldrkA
7- izkFkhZ us izkFkZuk dh gS fd fookfnr vkns'k }kjk izkFkhZ dks
lsok eqDr fd;s tkus ds vizkFkhZ ds d`R; dks vuqfpr ,oa voS/
4198
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
?kksf"kr fd;k tkos rFkk mls iwjs osru o fgr ykHkksa ds lkFk lsok esa
cgky fd;k tkos A
8- tokc esa vizkFkhZ ds izkDdFku gS fd tkap vf/dkjh us
tkap uSlfxZd U;k; ds fl¼kUrksa dh ikyuk djrs gq, ,oa vkjksfir
i{k dks mlds cpko dk leqfpr volj fn;k tkdj lEikfnr dh
gS] tks mfpr ,oa oS/ gS A tkap vf/dkjh us tkap i=kkoyh ij vk,
lHkh rF;ksa ij fopkj djus ds i'pkr~ viuk fu"d"kZ fudkyk gS o
tkap vf/dkjh us viuh tkap fjiksVZ esa izkFkhZ ij yxk;s x;s nl
vkjksiksa esa ls fliQZ Ng vkjksi tksfd Øe'k% 1 ls 5 o vkjksi la[;k
8 gS] izkFkhZ ij fl¼ ik, gSa vkSj 'ks"k vkjksi fl¼ ugha ik, gSa blh
ls Li"V gS fd izkFkhZ ds vfHkdFku xyr gSa A
9- vizkFkhZ ds ;g Hkh izkDdFku gS fd izkFkhZ ds }kjk 'kk[kk
izca/d ds fo#¼ v'kksHkuh; vkSj viekutud Hkk"kk dk iz;ksx
fd;k x;k Fkk A cSad tSls foRrh; laLFkkuksa esa bl izdkj dh dk;Zokgh
fd;k tkuk xEHkhj nqjkpj.k gS A blfy, fl¼ gq, vkjksiksa ds
vuqikr esa izkFkhZ dks tks n.M fn;k x;k gS og mfpr ,oa oS/ gS A
vuq'kklfud izkf/dkjh us izkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr vkjksi&i=k ds tokc]
tkap i=kkoyh] izLrkfor n.M ds i=k ds fnukad 27&1&2003 ds
lUnHkZ esa tokc ,oa fyf[kr cgl ij fopkj djus ds ckn ,oa izkFkhZ
dks O;fDrxr lquokbZ dk volj nsrs gq, izkFkhZ dks lsok ls c[kkZLr
dk n.M fn;k Fkk A vihyh; izkf/dkjh us Hkh izkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr rF;ksa
,oa miyC/ fjdkMZ ds vk/kj ij izkFkhZ dks fn;s x;s n.M esa
la'kks/u djrs gq, mls lsokfuo`fRr dk ykHk nsrs gq, lsok&eqDr ds
n.M ls nf.Mr fd;k x;k gS A
10- tkap dh Ítqrk (fairness) ds izkjfEHkd fcUnq ij
fnukad 25&11&2010 dks fuEu vkns'k ikfjr fd;k x;k A
‘‘It is held that there was no denial of fairplay to the
workman and the domestic enquiry against him is found
to be fair and proper”.
11- tkWp dks mDr vkns'k }kjk Ítq ik;k x;k blfy,
ekeys ds xq.kkoxq.k ij lquk x;k A i=kkoyh dk voyksdu fd;k A
12- fopkj.kh; iz'u ;g gS fd D;k tkap vf/dkjh ds
fu"d"kZ =kqfViw.kZ gSa ;fn bldk mRrj udkjkRed vkrk gS ml fLFkfr
esa bl iz'u ij fopkj djuk gksxk fd D;k vf/jksfir n.M fl¼
gq, vkjksiksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, dBksj ,oa vuqikfrd gS \
13- izkFkhZ dks dqy 10 vkjksiksa ds fy, vkjksi i=k fn;k x;k
Fkk A muesa ls vkjksi la- 1 ls 5 o 8 dks gh izekf.kr ik;k gS A
blfy, orZeku ekeys esa os gh izklafxd gSa A ftu vkjksiksa dks
izekf.kr ik;k gS os fuEu gSa %&
ARTICLES OF CHARGES
(1) Riotous and Disorderly and indecent behavior
on the premises, of the Bank - GROSS
MISCONDUCT as defined in Para 19.5 (c) of the
first Bipartite Settlement dated 19-10-1966.
(2) Willful insubordination and disobedience of any
lawful and reasonable orders of the Branch Manager
- GROSS MISCONDUCT as defined in Para 19.5 (e)
of first Bipartite Settlement dated 19-1-1966.
(3) Failing to show proper consideration, courtesy
and attention towards officers, customers and other
employees of the Bank and unseemly and
unsatisfactory behavior while on duty - MINOR
MISCONDUCT as defined in Para 19.7 U) of the first
Bipartite Settlement dated 19-10-1966.
(4) Marked disregard for ordinary requirements of
decency -
MINOR MISCONDUCT as defined in Para 19.7 (k)
of the First Bipartite Settlement dated 19-10-1966.
(5) Willfull slowing down in the performance of
Bank's work-GROSS MISCONDUCT as defined in
Para 19.5 (g) of first Bipartite Settlement dated
19-10-1966.
(6) Doing an act prejudicial to the interest (reputation
and financial interest) of the Bank - GROSS
MISCONDUCT as defined in Para 19.5 (j) of the first
Bipartite Settlement dated 19-10-1966.
'IMPUTATION OF CHARGES
(A)(i) On 27th February, 1996 when you were
working as Receipt Cashier at about 11.50 A.M. The
Representative of "SAHARA INDIA", a very
valuable customer. of the branch came to your Cash
Receipt Counter for cash deposition but you refused
to accept his cash receipt. In view of your refusal to
accept his cash, he was left with no option but to
approach Branch Manager. You have accepted his
cash only on receipt of written instructions given
by Branch Manager "Please Accept" on his ‘‘Pay-
In-Slip.’’
(A)(ii) Shortly thereafter at about 12.50 P.M. on the
same day the representative of "Rajasthan State Road
Transport Corporation", Shri Jagdish approached
you for cash deposition. Instead of accepting the
cash of RSRTC, you again refused to accept the
cash from this valuable customer also and advised
him to approach Branch Manager. Consequently,
Shri Jagdish also approached the Branch Manager
for the same problem of the non-acceptance of cash
by you. At this juncture, the Branch Manager had
no other option but to instruct you in writing to
"please accept the cash" on the "Pay-In-Slip" of
RSRTC but instead of complying with the aforesaid
resonable and lawful orders of the Brach Manager,
you refuese to accept the cash from representative
of RSRTC.
(A)(iii) Having refused to accept cash from
representative of RSRTC, in blatant disregard of
written instruction of the Branch Manager, you did
not stop at that. Agitated and provoked at the
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4199
aforementioned written instructions, you entered
cabin of the Branch Manager and started addressing
him in highly derogatory, abusive and insulting
language. Your unsolicited and unwarranted address
to the Branch Manager at this juncture is quoted
verbatim as under:-
^^rqEgkjs cki dk ukSdj le> j[kk gS D;k\ tks ckj&ckj
vkns'k ns jgs gks A rqe vius dks rhl ekj [kka le> jgs gks] eSus rks
vPNs&vPNs eSustjksa ok vkj- ,e- rd dks ukd jxMokbZ gS A os
xzkgd D;k rqEgkjs cki yxrs gSa \ lkFk gh /edh Hkjs 'kCnksa dk
iz;ksx djrs gq, dgk fd ;fn fgEer gS rks jksMost dk dS'k fxuok
dj ns[k yksA** vkSj Hkh dkiQh xkyh&xyksp okys 'kCnksa dk iz;ksx
fd;k] ftls 'kkyhurk ds ukrs eSustj lkgc us fy[kuk mfpr ugha
le>k A
A number of valuable customers of the Bank present
in the Branch witnessed the unseemly, unruly, dis-
orderly and riotous scene created by you. Needless
to say, this caused grave damage and slur on the
Bank’s image and reputation.
14- tkap vf/dkjh }kjk fuEu fopkj.kh; fcUnq vo/kfjr
fd, x;s %&
v (i) D;k fnukad 27&2&1996 dks ds'k &dkmUVj ij dk;Z
djrs gq, izkFkhZ us lgkjk bf.M;k ds izfrfuf/ dks lgkjk bf.M;k dk
dS'k tek djus ls igys euk fd;k rFkk ckn esa izca/d ds }kjk
tek iphZ ij ‘Please except’ ds funsZ'k ds ckn tek Lohdkj dh
x;h\
v (ii) D;k fnukad 27&2&1996 dks ds'k dkmUVj ij dk;Z
djrs gq, izkFkhZ us yxHkx 12-50pm ij jksMost ds dSf'kvj Jh
txnh'k ls izca/d }kjk tek iphZ ij ‘‘Harsukh ji please ac-
cept 12.50 noon’’ ds fyf[kr funsZ'k ds ckn Hkh ds'k tek gsrq
Lohdkj ugha fd;k x;k A
v (iii) D;k 'kk[kk izca/d ds fyf[kr funsZ'kksa dh voKk dj]
jksMost ds ds'k dks Lohdkj u djds izkFkhZ us Øksf/r gksdj mDr
fnukad dks 'kk[kk izca/d ds dSfcu esa tkdj izca/d ls
vlH;rkiwoZd] viekutud o mÙksftr Hkk"kk esa xkyh&xykSp
fd;k vkSj bl rjg ds O;ogkj ls cSad ds xzkgd ds lkeus cSad dh
izfr"Bk dks vk?kkr yxk\
15- tkap vf/dkjh us lk{khx.k Jh iq#"kksÙke nkl fla?ky
(Mw-4) 'kk[kk izca/d Jh txnh'k lksuh jksdfM+;k] lgkjk bf.M;k
(Mw-1) dh ekSf[kd lk{; ,oa lgkjk bf.M;k dh tek iphZ
(MEx-2) ds vk/kj ij fcUnq la[;k v (i), dk rFkk lk{khx.k Jh
txnh'k dqekj xgyksr dSf'kvj jksMost (MW-4) Jh iqjQ"kksÙke nkl
fla?ky 'kk[kk izca/d MW-5 Jh fot; flag edokuk mi&izca/d
'kk[kk dh ekSf[kd lk{; ,oa tek iphZ MEx-3 ds vk/kj ij fcUnq
la- v (ii) dk mÙkj ldkjkRed ik;kA blh izdkj lk{khx.k Jh
iqjQ"kksÙke nkl fla?ky 'kk[kk izca/d MW4 Jh fot; flag edokuk
MW-3 Jh Mwxjey jksdfM+;k] vkn'kZ f'k{k.k lfefr MW-13
Jh pSuflag lsokfuo`Ùk 'kk[kk izca/d MW7 Jh ';kelqUnj >kyk.kh
fo'ks"k lgk;d] 'kk[kk dh ekSf[kd lk{; ,oa izys[kh; lk{; izn'kZ
MEx 5 f'kdk;r ckcr nqjkpj.k ,oa v'kksHkuh; O;ogkj ,oa vkn'kZ
f'k{k.k lfefr] ckM+esj ds dSf'k;j }kjk 'kk[kk izca/d ckM+esj dks
fy[ks i=k MEx-6 ds vk/kj ij fcUnq la- v (iii) dk mÙkj Hkh
ldkjkRed gksuk ik;kA
16- tkap vf/dkjh us viuh tkap fjiksVZ esa vkjksi la- 1 o 4
dks fopkj.kh; fcUnq v (iii) rFkk vU; izekf.kr vkjksiksa dks fopkj.kh;
fcUnq v (ii) o (iii) ds fu"d"kksZa ds vk/kj ij izekf.kr ik;k gSA
17- fo}ku izfrfuf/ izkFkhZ us tkap vf/dkjh }kjk izekf.kr
ik;s x;s vkjksiksa ds lEca/ esa fudkys x;s fu"d"kks± dks =kqfViw.kZ crkrs
gq, rdZ izLrqr fd;s gS fd izkFkhZ dks Kkiu fnukad 27&2&1998
DEx-1 dfFkr nqO;Zogkj ds lEca/ esa Li"Vhdj.k nsus gsrq fn;k x;k
FkkA mlesa fliQZ R.S.R.T.C. ds jksdfM+;k ls udn jkf'k tek u djus
dk gh vfHkdFku FkkA lgkjk bf.M;k ds izfrfuf/ ls /ujkf'k tek
u djus dk dksbZ mYys[k ugha Fkk ysfdu fnukad 28&2&1996 dks
lgk;d egkizca/d] {ks=kh; dk;kZy;] tks/iqj dks izca/d ds }kjk
dfFkr nqO;Zogkj ds lEca/ esa tks lwpuk DEx-2 izsf"kr dh xbZ mlesa
lgkjk bf.M;k ds izfrfuf/ ls Hkh fnukad 27&2&1996 dks 11-50
cts udn jkf'k tek u djus dk vfHkdFku tksM+ fn;k x;kA blds
vykok izkFkhZ ds fo:¼ udn jkf'k tek u djus ds lEca/ esa dksbZ
fyf[kr f'kdk;r ugha FkhA lgkjk bf.M;k ds lsDVj eSustj Jh
thojkt flag }kjk {ksf=k; dk;kZy;] tks/iqj dks izsf"kr i=k fnukad
4&4&1998 esa cSad izca/d Jh iqjQ"kksÙke nkl fla?ky ,oa vf/dkjh
Jh egs'k 'kekZ }kjk izkFkhZ ds fo:¼ f'kdk;r gsrq ncko Mkyus dk
mYys[k fd;k FkkA R.S.R.T.C.ds jksdfM+;k Jh txnh'k dqekj xgyksr
us Hkh tkap ds nkSjku izLrqr vius 'kiFk&i=k esa dgk Fkk fd fnukad
27&2&1996 dks mldh ekStwnxh esa fdlh ds lkFk xkyh&xykSp o
vHknz O;ogkj ugha gqvkA ysfdu bu rF;ksa ij tkap vf/dkjh }kjk
fopkj ugha fd;k x;kA fo}ku izfrfuf/ dk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd
vfHk;kstu i{k ds }kjk izLrqr 11 lk{khx.k esa ls 7 lk{khx.k us
izca/d ds lkFk dfFkr vf'k"V O;ogkj o vf'k"V Hkk"kk ds iz;ksx
dk dFku ugha fd;k gSA ftu lk{khx.k ds dFku gSa muesa fojks/kHkkl
o vlaxrk,a gSaA Jh ';kelqUnj >kyk.kh dk dFku gS fd dSfcu ls
vLi"V vkoktsa vk jgh Fkh rFkk mlds }kjk lquh vLi"V vkokt dh
tkudkjh Jh pSuflag dks nh rFkk Jh pSuflag dk dFku blh vk/kj
ij gSA bl izdkj mDr nksuksa lk{khx.k dh lk{; ls vkjksi lkfcr
ugha gksrsA fo}ku izfrfuf/ izkFkhZ dk rdZ gS fd lk{khx.k Jh
iqjQ"kksÙke nkl fla?ky 'kk[kk izca/d o Jh fot; flag edokuk] mi
izca/d dh lk{; esa rkfRod fcUnqvksa ij fojks/kHkkl gS o budh
lk{; dk foospu djus ij vkjksi izekf.kr ugha gksrsA fo}ku
izfrfuf/ dk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd lk{; esa ;g rF; vk;s gS fd izkFkhZ
12-30 ls 1-15 cts rd viuh lhV ij gh ugha FkkA lk{kh Jh
txnh'k xgyksr ds dFku ls Hkh izxV gksrk gS fd 12-30 P.M ij
'kk[kk izca/d ds lkFk vHknz O;ogkj dh dfFkr ?kVuk ds le;
izkFkhZ ogka ekStwn ugha FkkA ysfdu tkap vf/dkjh us bu rF;ksa ij Hkh
fopkj ugha fd;k gSA dsoy lk{khx.kksa ds c;kuksa rFkk i{kdkjksa ds
4200
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
rdksZa dk tkap fjiksVZ esa fooj.k fn;k gS A tkap vf/dkjh us nksuksa
i{kksa dh lk{; dk rqyukRed foospu ugha fd;k gS vkSj u gh
vkjksi izekf.kr ekuus ds dksbZ dkj.k n'kkZ;s gSaA blds vykok
izfrijh{kk dh lk{; dk Hkh lgh foospu ugha fd;k gSA blfy,
izekf.kr ekus x;s vkjksiksa ds fu"d"kZ =kwfViw.kZ gSaA
18- mDr rdksZa ds fojks/ esa fo}ku izfrfuf/ vizkFkhZ dk rdZ
gS fd izkFkhZ ds }kjk vkjksi i=k dk tokc izLrqr fd;k gS mlds rF;ksa
esa fojks/kHkkl gS ,oa mlesa izkFkhZ dh ;g Li"V LohdkjksfDr gS fd
'kk[kk izca/d us vkjksfir izkFkhZ dks lgkjk bf.M;k dk ds'k tek
djus ds fy, vkns'k fn;k FkkA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd ml fnu
izkFkhZ ds ikl dk;Z vf/d gksus dh ckr Hkh lgh ugha gSA izkFkhZ us
Lo;a us fnukad 27&2&1996 dh dSf'kvj fjlhV&cqd is'k dh gS
ftlds vuqlkj mlds }kjk dqy 12 tek;sa yxHkx 4-85 yk[k dh
tek dh xbZ gS o vfUre tek lgkjk bf.M;k dh gSA tcfd nwljs
dSf'kvj dh 9-47 yk[k dh 33 tek;s gSaA vr% Li"V gS fd izkFkhZ ds
ikl dk;Z vf/d ugha FkkA tek iphZ;k Ex-M-II & Ex-M-III ls Hkh
bl ckr dh iqf"V gksrh gS fd izkFkhZ }kjk tek djus ls badkj djus
ij tek djus gsrq izca/d dks funsZ'k nsus iM+sA
19- fo}ku izfrfuf/ vizkFkhZ dk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ us
fnukad 27&2&1996 dks R.S.R.T.C ds izfrfuf/ ds tek dS'k u
djus ds lEcaf/r vkjksi ds lanHkZ esa tokc esa dgk gS fd R.S.R.T.C.
ds izfrfuf/ ds vkus ls iwoZ nks cSad xzkgd lgkjk bf.M;k o Hkkjrh;
thou chek fuxe dh /ujkf'k ysuk 'ks"k Fkk o le; lekIr gksus
okyk Fkk rFkk mlds }kjk 'kk[kk izca/d dks ;g Li"V djus ij Hkh
fd uksV fxuus ds fy, vf/d le; ugha gS] 'kk[kk izca/d us nwljh
O;oLFkk dh FkhA blls Li"V gS fd 'kk[kk izca/d us funsZ'k fn;s Fks o
funsZ'k nsus ds ckn 'kk[kk izca/d ds dSfcu esa x;k FkkA blds vykok
dSf'kvj fjlhIV cqd (Ex-d-5) esa R.S.R.T.C. dh jkf'k tek ugha gS
o og jkf'k nwljs dSfjvj ds jftLVj esa tek gSA blls ;g Hkh Li"V
gS fd izkFkhz us 'kk[kk izca/d ds funsZ'kksa ds ckotwn R.S.T.C. dh
jkf'k tek ugha dh FkhA rF;ksa o ifjfLFkfr;ksa ls ;g fl¼ gS fd
lgkjk bf.M;k dh jkf'k ,oa R.S.T.C. dh jkf'k tek djus ls badkj
djus ij izkFkhZ dks fyf[kr funsZ'k fn;s x;s rFkk funsZ'kksa ds ckotwn
R.S.R.T.C. dh jkf'k tek ugha dh rFkk 'kk[kk izca/d ds dSfcu esa
tkdj jkf'k tek djus ls vleFkZrk O;Dr dh rFkk nqO;Zogkj
fd;kA vr% vkjksi la[;k 1 ls 5 o vkjksi la[;k 8 ds fy, izkFkhZ
dks nqjkpj.k dh nks"kh ikus ds lEca/ esa tkap vf/dkjh }kjk tks
fu"d"kZ fudkys x;s gSa og lgh gS o miyC/ rF;ksa ,oa lk{; ds
vk/kj ij mDr vkjksiksa dks fl¼ ekuus esa tkap vf/dkjh us dksbZ
=kqfV ugha dh gSA
20- eSaus mDr rdksZa ij euu fd;k rFkk mudks n`f"Vxr j[krs
gq, tkap iz=kkoyh dk è;kuiwoZd voyksdu fd;kA
21- Jh iq#"kksÙke nkl fla?ky 'kk[kk izca/d us vius dFku
eas dgk gS fd fnukad 27&2&1996 dks lgkjk bf.M;k ds izfrfuf/
Jh txnh'k lksuh us vkdj crk;k fd izkFkhZ us udn jkf'k tek djus
ls badkj dj fn;k rc MEx-2 tek iphZ ij ‘Please Accept’
fy[kdj mls funsZf'kr fd;kA lgkjk bf.M;k ds izfrfuf/ Mw-1 Jh
txnh'k lksuh us Hkh bl rF; dh iqf"V dh gS fd 11&11-30 cts og
udn jkf'k tek djus gsrq x;k Fkk rFkk izkFkhZ }kjk euk djus ij
izca/d ls feyk FkkA tek iphZ MEx-2 ls Hkh mDr dFkuksa dh iqf"V
gksrh gSA Lo;a izkFkhZ us tkap vf/dkjh ds le{k fn, vius dFku esa
dgk gS fd fnukad 27&2&1996 dks tc lgkjk bf.M;k dk izfrfuf/
mlds ikl jde tek djkus igyh ckj vk;k rc mlus ;g dgk Fkk
fd xzkgd vf/d gaS o jde Hkh vf/d tek djkbZ tk jgh gS
blfy, igys jkf'k tek gksuk laHko ugha gS mlds ckn og ^Dyh;fjax
gkml* pyk x;k Fkk rFkk ogka ls okil ykSVk rc lgkjk bf.M;k dk
izfrfuf/ O;oLFkkid ds vkns'k ysdj jde tek djus ds fy,
igys ls cSBk FkkA izkFkhZ ds dFku ls Hkh izca/d Jh iq#"kksÙke nkl
fla?ky ds dFku dh bl lhek rd iqf"V gksrh gS fd lgkjk bf.M;k
dk izfrfuf/ Jh txnh'k lksuh udn jkf'k tek djkus gsrq izkFkh ds
ikl x;k Fkk o mldk dS'k ml le; tek ugha fd;k x;k rFkk
O;oLFkkid ds }kjk tek djus gsrq funsZ'k fn, x;s FksA Dyh;fjax
gkml ls okil vkus ds ckn lgkjk bf.M;k dk dS'k izkFkhZ us tek
fd;kA
22- ;¼fi fnukad 27&2&1996 dks izkFkhZ }kjk vkns'kksa dh
vogsyuk djus o izca/d ds lkFk nqO;Zogkj djus ds lEca/ esa
Li"Vhdj.k nsus gsrq izkFkhZ dks izsf"kr Kkiu DEx-1 esa lgkjk bf.M;k
ds izca/d ls udn tek Lohdkj u djus dk Li"V mYys[k ugha
vk;k gS ysfdu ;s rF; vafdr gS fd ml fnu 11-50 ls gh izkFkhZ us
xzkgdksa ls udn tek Lohdkj djus ds fy, badkj djuk izkjaHk dj
fn;k rFkk xzkgdksa }kjk izca/d ls lEidZ djus ij tek Lohdkj
djus gsrq izkFkhZ dks funsZf'kr fd;k x;kA vr% fo}ku izfrfuf/ izkFkhZ
ds bl rdZ esa lkj izrhr ugha gksrk fd Kkiu DEx-1 fnukad
27&2&1996 esa lgkjk bf.M;k ls udn jkf'k tek u djus dk Li"V
mYys[k ugha gS] blfy, lgkjk bf.M;k dh jkf'k tek u djus dh
dgkuh euxa<+r gS ftls ckn esa fnukad 27&2&1996 dks lgk;d
izca/d {ks=kh; dk;kZy; dks izsf"kr lwpuk DEx-2 esa tksM+k x;k gSA
23- vkjksi i=k ds tokc fnukad 2&5&1996 esa izkFkhZ us dgk
gS fd lgkjk bf.M;k dk izfrfuf/ jde tek djkus gsrq vk;k mlh
le; jde izkIr dj jlhn ns nh FkhA mDr dFkukuqlkj izkFkhZ 11-30
ij lgkjk bf.M;k ds izfrfuf/ dks jde tek djus ls euk ugha
fd;kA tcfd mDr tokc esa gh vkxs fy[kk gS fd 'kk[kk dk;kZy;
esa djhc 1-15 cts ij tc igaqpk rks R.S.R.T.C. ls iwoZ vkus okys
xzkgd lgkjk bf.M;k rFkk Hkkjrh; thou chek fuxe [kM+s Fks
ftlds fy, iwoZ vkns'k 'kk[kk izca/d us fn, FksA blesa ;g Li"V
LohdkjksfDr gS fd 'kk[kk izca/d us dS'k tek djus ds fy, funs'k
fn;k FkkA dS'k tek djus gsrq funsZ'k ls gh ;g izxV gksrk gS fd izkFkhZ
ds }kjk dS'k tek u djus ij ;g funsZ'k nsus dh vko';drk gqbZA
24- izkFkhZ ;g dgdj vk;k gS fd xzkgd vf/d gksus ds
dkj.k lgkjk bf.M;k dh jde igys tek djuk laHko ugha FkkA
izkFkhZ us fnukad 27&2&1996 dks dSf'kvj fjlhV cqd fnukad
27&2&1996 dks tks mldh Lo;a dh gS] is'k dh gS] vkSj ,d vU;
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4201
dS'k cqd Hkh is'k dh gSA izkFkhZ ds }kjk dqy ckjg tek,a Lohdkj dh
xbZ gSA ftldh dqy jkf'k 4-85 yk[k #i;s ds yxHkx gS vafre
tek lgkjk bf.M;k dh gSA ftlds lEca/ esa tokc esa dgk gS fd
lgkjk bf.M;k dh jkf'k vkrs gh ys yh FkhA blds vykok nwljs
dSf'kvj dh fjlhV cqd esa cÙkhl tek,a yxHkx 9-47 yk[k dh gSaA
,slh fLFkfr esa fo}ku izfrfuf/ vizkFkhZ ds bl rdZ esa lkj izrhr gksrk
gS fd izkFkhZ ds ikl dk;Z vf/d gksus dh ckr fo'oluh; izrhr ugha
gksrhA
25- vr% vfHkys[k ij miyC/ mijksDr ekSf[kd] izysf[k;
,oa ikfjfLFkfrtU; lk{; ds vk/kj ij ;g ugha dgk tk ldrk fd
tkap vf/dkjh us ;g fu"d"kZ fudkyus esa =kqfV dh gS fd lgkjk
bf.M;k ds izfrfuf/ dh uxn jkf'k tek djus ls izkFkhZ us badkj
fd;k blfy, izca/d dks jkf'k tek djus ds fy, funsZ'k nsus iM+sA
26- fnukad 27&2&1996 dks gh R.S.R.T.C. ds izfrfuf/ dk
dS'k tek djus ls badkj djus ds laca/ esa Jh iqjQ"kksÙke nkl fla?ky
'kk[kk izca/d dk dFku gS fd ml fnu R.S.R.T.C ds jksdfM+;k Jh
txnh'k xgyksr us vkdj crk;k fd izkFkhZ udn jkf'k tek ugha dj
jgk gSA bl ij mlus tek iphZ ij ‘Harsukh ji please accept
12.50 Noon’ fy[kdj jkf'k tek djus gsrq funsZ'k fn;k FkkA mDr
dFku dh iqf"V jksdfM+;k R.S.R.T.C. Jh txnh'k xgyksr MW-2
ds dFku ,oa mlds }kjk izLrqr f'kdk;r ,oa tek iphZ MEx-3 ls
gksrh gSA blds vykok dSf'kvj fjlhV cqd ls ;g Hkh tkfgj gksrk gS
fd R.S.R.T.C. dh jkf'k izkFkhZ us tek ugha dh Fkh rFkk dk;Zokgd
eq[; jksdfM+;k ds }kjk jkf'k tek dh xbZ FkhA mijksDr lk{; ds
vk/kj ij tkap vf/dkjh dk ;g fu"d"kZ Hkh =kqfViw.kZ izrhr ugha
gksrk fd izkFkhZ ds }kjk R.S.R.T.C. dh jkf'k tek djus ls badkj
fd;k rFkk 'kk[kk izca/d ds funsZ'k ds ckotwn R.S.R.T.C. dh jkf'k
tek ugha dh xbZA
27- Jh iq#"kksÙke nkl fla?ky MW-4 us vius dFku esa dgk
gS fd jksMost ds dSf'kvj us tc dS'k tek u gksus dh ckr dgh
rc mlds }kjk tek iphZ ij izkFkhZ dks funsZ'k fn;s x;s FksA mDr iphZ
ysdj tc jksMost dk dSf'kvj izkFkhZ ds ikl x;k rks izkFkhZ mlds
dSfcu esa vk;k o xkyh&xykSp 'kq: dj fn;kA
28- izkFkhZ }kjk 'kk[kk izca/d ds dSfcu esa tkdj mÙksftr
gksdj viekutud Hkk"kk esa nqO;Zogkj djus ds vkjksi ds lanHkZ esa
Jh iq#"kksÙke nkl fla?ky 'kk[kk izca/d ds dFku dh iqf"V Jh
fot; flag edokuk] mi&izca/d us Hkh dh gSA bl lEca/ esa fnukad
27&2&1996 dks 'kk[kk esa mifLFkr Jh fot; flag edokuk
mi&izcaèkd o Jh egs'k pUnz xxZ vf/dkjh us la;qDr gLrk{kfjr
i=k MEx-5 egklfpo] nh cSad vkWiQ jktLFkku ,lksfl,'ku] t;iqj
dks izsf"kr fd;k FkkA ftldh izfr {ks=kh; dk;kZy;] tks/iqj dks Hkh
izsf"kr dh Fkh mDr i=k esa izkFkhZ ds }kjk fd;s x;s nqO;Zogkj ds ckjs esa
fy[kk x;k FkkA
29- mijksDr lk{; ds vykok izca/u esa Jh ';kelqUnj
>kyk.kh MW-7 Jh pSuflag MW-13 ,oa Jh Mwaxjey MW-3 dh
Hkh lk{; djokbZ gSA Jh ';kelqUnj >kyk.kh us dFku esa dgk gS fd
izkFkhZ o izca/d ds chp xeZtks'kh ds lkFk okrkZyki gks jgk Fkk o
ckgj vLi"V vkoktsa vk jgh Fkh o xokg Jh Mawxjey MW-3 us
Hkh mDr ckr dgh gSA xokg Jh pSu flag MW-13 us dFku fd;k
gS fd mls Jh ';kelqUnj >kyk.kh us crk;k fd O;oLFkkid ds
dSfcu ls 'kksj&'kjkcs dh vkoktsa vk jgh gaSA rc mlus gjlq[k dks
ckgj cqyk;k o iwNk rks crk;k fd dS'k ysdj fxuus dks >xM+k gSA
30- tkap vf/dkjh ds }kjk cpko i{k ds }kjk izLrqr rdksZa
ij euu djus ds ckn ,oa izca/d dh lk{; dk foospu djus ds
ckn izca/u }kjk izLrqr izys[k MEx-5, MEx-6 ,oa ekSf[kd lk{;
ds vk/kj ij gh ;g fu"d"kZ fudkyk gS fd izkFkhZ 'kk[kk izca/d ds
dSfcu esa x;k o vekutud ,oa mÙksftr Hkk"kk esa xkyh&xykSp dhA
31- izkFkhZ us vius tokc esa dgk gS fd vkjksiksa esa ;g dgha
Hkh Li"V ugha gS fd 'kk[kk izca/d ds }kjk funsZ'k fn, tk pqds Fks rks
muds dejs esa tkus dk iz'u D;ksa mRiUu gqvk ysfdu tokc esa ;g
Hkh dgk gS fd 'kk[kk izca/d dks mlds }kjk ;g Li"V fd;k x;k
fd R.S.R.T.C. ds izfrfuf/ ds vkus ls iwoZ nks cSad xzkgd dh jkf'k
ysuk 'ks"k Fkk vkSj cSad le; 2 cts lekIr gksus okyk Fkk] o uksV
fxuus ds fy, vf/d le; ugha gSA tokc esa ;g Hkh ekuk gS fd
izca/d }kjk nwljh O;oLFkk dh xbZA tkap vf/dkjh ds le{k ftjg
esa Hkh ;g Lohdkj fd;k gS fd O;oLFkkid }kjk Jh txnh'k
jksdfM+;k R.S.R.T.C. dh jkf'k tek djus gsrq funsZ'k ds lEca/ esa
mlus O;oLFkkid dks tkdj viuh fLFkfr Li"V dh FkhA vi'kCnksa
dk iz;ksx ugha fd;kA blls ;g Li"V gS fd 'kk[kk izca/d }kjk mls
funsZ'k fn, x, o mlds ckn 'kk[kk izca/d ds dSfcu esa x;kA
vfHkys[k ij vk, rF;ksa ls ;g Hkh Li"V gS fd funsZ'k ds ckotwn
jkf'k tek ugha dh Fkh o vU; dS'kh;j ds }kjk jkf'k tek dh xbZA
izkFkhZ us dSfcu esa tkdj Lo;a ds dFkukuqlkj vleFkZrk O;Dr dh
FkhA mDr ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa tkap vf/dkjh ds }kjk tks fu"d"kZ fudkys
x;s gSa mUgsa =kqfViw.kZ ugha dgk tk ldrkA
32- ;g lqfuf'pr fof/ gS fd tgka tkap dks mfpr o ½tq
ik;k x;k gks o tkap vf/dkjh us miyC/ lk{; ds vk/kj ij
fu"d"kZ fudkys gkas U;k;kf/dj.k dks vihyh; U;k;ky; dh rjg
lk{; dk iqu% fo'ys"k.k o foospu djrs gq, Lo;a ds mlls fHkUu
fu"d"kZ fudkyus dk {ks=kkf/dkj ugha gSA tkap vf/dkjh ds fu"d"kks±
ds lanHkZ esa ml fLFkfr esa gLr{ksi fd;k tk ldrk gS tc fu"d"kZ
=kqfViw.kZ gksA
33- ;g Hkh lqfuf'pr fof/ gS fd fu"d"kZ dks =kqfViw.kZ rHkh
dgk tk ldrk gS tc fu"d"kZ fdlh lk{; ij vk/kfjr ugha gS] ;k
;qfDr;qDr :i ls tkap ls lacaf/r miyC/ lkexzh ds vk/kj ij
tkap vf/dkjh }kjk fudkys x;s fu"d"kksZa ij igaqpus ds fy, dksbZ
vk/kj ugha gS rFkk fu"d"kZ Extraneous consideration ds vk/kj
ij fudkys x;s gaS ;k tks fu"d"kZ fudkys x;s gSa oks iw.kZr;k vfo'oluh;
lk{; ds vk/kj ij gaSA ;fn vfHkys[k ij dqN lk{; gSa tks Lohdkj
fd;s tkus ;ksX; gks rks mlds vk/kj ij fudkys fu"d"kksZa dks =kqfViw.kZ
ugha dgk tk ldrkA lk{; dh vi;kZIrk ds vk/kj ij Hkh fu"d"kZ
dks =kqfViw.kZ ugha ekuk tk ldrkA
4202
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
34- orZeku ekeys esa tkap dks Ítq ,oa mfpr ik;k x;k gS
rFkk tkap vf/dkjh }kjk tks fu"d"kZ fudkys x;s gSa og vfHkys[k
ij miyC/ lk{; ds vk/kj ij fudkys gSa rFkk lk{; dk foospu o
fo'ys"k.k Hkh fd;k gS A blfy, ;g ugha dgk tk ldrk fd fu"d"kZ
lk{; ij vk/kfjr ugha gS ;k fudkys x;s fu"d"kks± ij igqapus ds
fy, dksbZ vk/kj gh ugha Fkk A ;fn miyC/ lk{; ds vk/kj ij
fHkUu fu"d"kZ lEHko Hkh gks rks bl vk/kj ij tkap
vf/dkjh }kjk fudkys x;s fu"d"kks± ls vlger gksrs gq, fHkUu
fu"d"kZ ugha fudkys tk ldrs A ekSf[kd ,oa ifjfLFkrtU; lk{;
ds vk/kj ij vf/lHkkO;rk dh izcyrk dks ns[kk tkuk Fkk A vkjksiksa
dks lUnsg ls iwjs lkfcr djuk visf{kr ugha Fkk A lk{; esa dqN
fcUnqvksa ij fojks/kHkkl ;k vlaxrrkvksa ;k dqN lk{khx.k dh lk{;
dh fo'oluh;rk lUnsgiwoZ gksus ds vk/kj ij 'ks"k lk{; dks vLohdkj
ugha fd;k tk ldrk A blfy, vihyh; U;k;ky; dh jkg lk{;
dk iqu% foospu o fo'ys"k.k djrs gq, orZeku ekeys esa tkap
vf/dkjh }kjk fudkys x;s fu"d"kks± ls fHkUu fu"d"kZ fudkyus dk
vf/dkj bl U;k;kf/dj.k dks ugha gS A tkap vf/dkjh ds }kjk
miyC/ lk{; ds vk/kj fudkys x;s fu"d"kks± ds lEcU/ esa
vf/dj.k ;g dgrs gq, fHkUu fu"d"kZ ugha fudky ldrk fd
miyC/ lk{; ds vk/kj ij vU; fu"d"kZ fudkyk tkuk Hkh lEHko
gS A
35- mijksDr foospu ds vuqlkj tkap vf/dkjh }kjk izekf.kr
ik;s x;s vkjksiksa ds lUnHkZ esa fudkys x;s fu"d"kks± dks =kqfViw.kZ ugha
ik;k tk ldrk A
36- fo}ku izfrfuf/ izkFkhZ dk rdZ gS fd vihyh; izkf/dkjh
us izkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr fyf[kr cgl esa mBk;s x;s fcUnqvksa ij fopkj
fd;s fcuk gh tkap vf/dkjh o vuq'kklfud izkf/dkjh ds fu"d"kks±
ls lgerh trkrs gq, vkjksiksa dks izekf.kr eku fy;k vihyh;
izkf/dkjh }kjk bu rF;ksa ij Hkh foPkkj ugha fd;k fd izkFkhZ ds fo#¼
leLr dk;Zokgh tYnckth esa dh xbZ rFkk izcU/d us
}s"krk ds dkj.k eux<+r vkjksi yxk, gSa rFkk lgkjk bf.M;k ds
izfrfuf/ ij f'kdk;r fy[kus gsrq vuqfpr ncko Mkyk x;k A
blfy;s vihyh; izkf/dkjh ds fu"d"kZ fof/ lEer ugha gS A
37- fo}ku izfrfuf/ vizkFkhZ dk dguk gS fd vihyh;
izkf/dkjh us izkFkhZ dks lquokbZ dk i;kZIr volj nsus ,oa i=kkoyh ij
miyC/ lHkh rF;ksa ij xgu fopkj djus ds ckn tkap vf/dkjh ds
fu"d"kks± ls lgerh trkbZ gS A
38- mDr rdks± ij euu fd;k vihyh; izkf/dkjh ds vkns'k
ds voyksdu ls izxV gksrk gS fd mlds }kjk izkFkhZ ds }kjk izLrqr
fyf[kr cgl ,oa miyC/ ekSf[kd ,oa izysf[k; lk{; ij fopkj
djus ,oa lk{; dk foospu djus ds ckn gh vkns'k ikfjr fd;k gS A
vkns'k esa izkFkhZ }kjk fnukad 31&3&2004 ds nks i=kksa ds tfj;s tks
fyf[kr cgl izLrqr dh xbZ ml ij fopkj djus ds rF; esa
mYys[k gS A vkns'k ds voyksdu ls izdV gksrk gS fd izkFkhZ dks
O;fDrxr :i ls lquokbZ dk volj fn;k gS rFkk izkFkhZ ds }kjk ftu
eq[; fcUnqvksa dks fyf[kr cgl esa mBk;k x;k mu ij fopkj djrs
gq, lk{; dk foospu dj foLr`r vkns'k ikfjr fd;k gS A lk{khx.k
yksds'k ekFkqj Mw-8 ,oa xkSre pUæ esgrk Mw-9 dh lk{; dk
foospu djrs gq, lk{; dks fo'oluh; ugha ekuk gS rFkk leLr
rF;ksa ij lexz :i ls fopkj djrs gq, vuq'kklfud izkf/dkjh
}kjk fn, x;s n.M esa la'kks/u djrs gq, lsokfuo`fÙk dk ykHk nsrs gq,
lsok eqDr ds n.M ls nf.Mr fd;k gS A blfy, bl lEcU/ esa
fo}ku izfrfuf/ }kjk izLrqr rdZ Lohdkj fd;s tkus ;ksX; ugha gS
39- fnukad 25&11&2010 ds vkns'k }kjk izkFkhZ ds fo#¼
tkWp dks Ítq (fair) o mfpr ik;k gS rFkk tkap vf/dkjh }kjk
tkap ds vk/kj ij tks fu"d"kZ fudkys x;s gSa mUgsa Hkh =kqfViw.kZ gksuk
ugha ik;k x;k gS] blfy, fopkj.kh; iz'u ;g jg tkrk gS fd D;k
vkjksiksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, vf/jksfir n.M dBksj o vuuqikfrd
gS A
40- fo}ku izfrfuf/ izkFkhZ dk dguk gS vihyh; izkf/dkjh us
vuq'kklfud vf/dkjh }kjk vkjksfir fd, x, c[kkZLrxh ds n.Mkns'k
dks ;|fi de djds uohuhÑr fd;k gS vkSj izkFkhZ dks lsokfuo`fÙk
ifjykHk fnyk, x, gSa ysfdu izkFkhZ ds fo#¼ ,sls xEHkhj nqjkpj.k
dk ekeyk ugha gS ftlds dkj.k cSad dks viwrZuh; ;k ekSfæd {kfr
gqbZ gks A izkFkhZ yxHkx 16 o"kks± ls cSad lsok esa ;k yxHkx bruh gh
vof/ lsok esa 'ks"k Fkh A iwoZ esa fdlh nqjkpj.k ds ekeys esa nks"kh
ekuus dk ekeyk Hkh ugha Fkk] blfy;s lsok ls gVk, tkus dk n.M
+vkjksfir fd;k tkuk U;k; lEer ugha dgk tk ldrk A vius
rdks± ds leFkZu esa (2010) 2 SCC Page 236] (2009) (1)
RLW 1312(Raj.). (1998) (II) LLJ, 923 (Kerala), 1994 (I) LLJ
586 (J &K), 1983, (I) SLR, 628, 1983 FLR (62) 100 (SC), 1984
FLR (64) 433 (SC), 1996 (I) LLN 14 (SC), 1997 (I) LLN 69
(SC), 2005 (100) FLR 1218 (SC) ds n`"VkUrksa dks izLrqr fd;k gS A
41- mDr rdks± ds fojks/ esa fo}ku izfrfuf/ vizkFkhZ dk rdZ
gS fd izkFkhZ dks fn;k x;k lsokeqfDr dk n.M mfpr ,oa oS/ gS rFkk
izkFkhZ ds fo#¼ vkjksiksa dh xEHkhjrk ds vuqikr esa gS A mudk ;g
Hkh dguk gS fd cSad tSls foÙkh; laLFkku esa xzkgdksa dh tek;s
Lohdkj ugha djuk 'kk[kk izca/d ds funsZ'kksa ds ckn Hkh xzkgdksa dh
jkf'k tek ugha djuk rFkk izca/d ds lkFk nqO;Zogkj xEHkhj nqjkpj.k
gS A blfy, ,sls ekeys esa vkjksfir n.M esa dksbZ gLr{ksi djus dk
dksbZ mfpr vk/kj ugha gS A bl lEcU/ esa mUgksaus 1996] LLR,
1129 (SC), 2006 LLR, 252 (SC), 2005 LLR, 360, (SC), 2006
LLR, 415 (Kerala), 2011 LLR, 934 (Karnataka), 2006 LLR,
296 (SC) 2005 LLR, 878 (Kerala) ds n`"VkUrksa dks izLrqr fd;k gSA
42- eSaus mDr rdks± ,oa izLrqr n`"VkUrksa esa izfrikfnr fl¼kUrksa
ij euu fd;k A
43- ;g dkuwuh fLFkfr fookfnr ugha gS fd vkS|ksfxd fookn
vf/fu;e dh 1947 dh /kjk 11&A ds vUrxZr iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa ds
vUrxZr tgka fdlh Jfed dh lsokUeqfDr ;k inP;qfr ds lEcU/ esa
dksbZ ekeyk gks rks U;k;fu.kZ;u dh dk;Zokfg;ksa ds vuqØe esa
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4203
vf/dj.k ds ;g lek/ku gksus ij dh lsokUeqfDr ;k inP;qfr dk
vkns'k U;k;ksfpr ugha gS] ogka og vius vf/fu.kZ; }kjk ,sls vkns'k
dks vikLr dj ,sls n.M ds cnys U;wurj n.M ns ldrk gS] tSls fd
ekeys dh ifjfLFkfr esa visf{kr gks A
44- nksuksa i{k ds fo}ku izfrfuf/x.k us vius rdks± ds leFkZu
esa 1996] LLR, 1129 (SC) ,oa 2005 LLR 360 (SC), U;k;n`"VkUrksa
dks is'k fd;k gS A
45- 1996 esa] LLR 1129 (SC) NEW SHORROK MILLS
V/s. MAHESHBHAI T. RAO ds ekeys esa cnyh Jfed us
miizcU/d ds dejs esa tkdj xkfy;ks nh rFkk /edh nh dh fey
ds vf/dkjh feyds ckgj lqjf{kr ugha jgasxs A ;fn pkj&ikap
vfèkdkfj;ksa dh gR;k ds fy, mls tsy tkuk iMs+ rks Hkh og ijokg
ugha djrk A mls lsok ls mUeksfpr djus ds n.M ls nf.M+r fd;k x;k
Fkk] ysfdu mDr Jfed dks iwoZ esa Hkh dbZ ckj ,sls nqjkpj.k ds
ekeys esa nf.M+r fd;k x;k Fkk A mDr ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa ekuuh;
loksZÙke U;k;ky; us mUeksfpr djus ds n.M+ dks vuuqikfrd ugha
ekuk A blh izdkj 2005 LLR 360 (SC)MAHINDRA AND
MAHINDRA LTD. V/s. N.B. NARAVADE, etc.esa Jfed ij
Hkn~nh Hkk"kk esa mPp vf/dkfj;ksa dks xkyh&xykSp djus dk ekeyk
Fkk ysfdu mDr ekeys esa Hkh Jfed dks iwoZ esa ,d ls vf/d ckj
pktZ'khV nh xbZ Fkh rFkk muesa ls ,d Jfed ij ikbi ls vius
lkFkh ij geyk dj xEHkhj pksV igqapkus dk vkjksi Fkk blfy,]
ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; us mlds leLr vkpj.k dks n`f"Vxr
j[krs gq, lsok ls c[kkZLrxh ds n.M dks vuqikfrd ugha ekuk A
46- 2011 LLR 934 Karnatka State Road Transport
Corporation, V/s. P. Selvaraj. ds ekeys esa vipkjh ij mPp
vf/dkfj;ksa ls vHkæ xkyh&xykSp djus] nqO;Zogkj djus o mu ij
geyk djus o dkWiksZjs'ku dh lEifÙk dks uqdlku igqapkus ds vkjksi
Fks o blls iwoZ Hkh N% nqjkpj.k ds ekeyksa esa mldks y?kq n.M+ ls
nf.M+r fd;k x;k Fkk A mDr ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa mipkjh dks ukSdjh ls
c[kkZLr djus ds n.M dks mfpr ekuk A 2006 LLR 415
(Kerala)South Indian Bank V/s. V.G. Krishan Kumar &
Another esa czkUp eSustj ds lkFk xkyh&xykSp djus dk vkjksi
lkfcr ik;k x;k Fkk rFkk iwoZ esa Hkh bl rjg dk nqO;Zogkj djus dk
vkjksi Fkk A
47- mijksDr izdj.kksa esa lEcfU/r vipkjhx.k dk iwoZ
vkpj.k Hkh [kjkc jgk Fkk rFkk iwoZ esa Hkh nqjkpj.k ds ekeys muds
fo#¼ Fks A ij orZeku ekeys esa izkFkhZ ds iwoZ vkpj.k [kjkc jgus
;k iwoZ esa fdlh izdkj dk nqO;Zogkj djus dk dksbZ rF; vfHkys[k
ij ugha vk;k gS A vr% orZeku ekeys ds rF; mijksDr n`"VkUrksa
ds rF;ksa ls fHkUu gS A blh izdkj n`"VkUr 2006 LLR 252, dukZVdk
cSad cuke ,- ,y- eksgu jko ds ekeys ds Í.k ftls fn;k tkuk
Fkk] mls Í.k u nsdj fdlh vU; dks iQthZ Í.k nsus gsrq "kM+;U=k
djus dk ekeyk Fkk A 2006 LLR 296 L.K. Verma V/s. HMT
Ltd. ds ekeys esa Hkn~nh xkfy;ka nsus ds vykok ,d gh vof/ eas
anks fHkUu&fHkUu txg dkuiqj ,oa jk;cjsyh esa Øe'k% fMIyksek
dkslZ djus rFkk bf.M;u VsyhiQksu b.M~LVht esa dke djus o ,d
gh le; esa bykgkckn esa 'kiFk&i=k vkSFk&deh'uj ds le{k
rLnhd djokus o dkj[kkus esa mifLFkfr fn[kkus ds vkjksi Hkh Fks A
blfy, ekeyksa esa lsok ls gVkus ds n.M dks vuuqikfrd ekuk A
vr% buds rF; Hkh orZeku ekeys ls fHkUu gSa A
48- 2005 LLN (3) 238 (xqtjkr) esa vknru lg&Jfedksa
,oa mPp vf/dkfj;ksa ds lkFk nqO;Zogkj djus o xkyh&xyksp djus
ds ekeys esa ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; us izfrikfnr fd;k fd lq/kjus
dk volj mlh ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa fn;k tk ldrk gS fd tc nqO;Zogkj
dk igyk ekeyk gks A vknru nqO;Zogkj djus ds lkFk dksbZ ujeh
ugha cjrh tk ldrh A mDr U;k; n`"VkUr ls fo}ku izfrfuf/ izkFkhZ
ds bl rdZ dks leFkZu feyrk gS] fd tgka iwoZ vkpj.k vPNk jgk
gks rFkk vipkjh ij nqO;Zogkj djus dk dksbZ igyk ekeyk gks rks
n.M nsus ds ekeys esa mnkjrk cjrh tk ldrh gS A
49- 1994 F.J.R. (64) 442 (S.C.) VED PRAKASH GUPTA
V/s. DELTON CABLE INDIA PRIVATE LTD. ds ekeys esa
vipkjh ij fuEu vkjksi Fkk %&
‘‘That on 1-8-1979 as per instructions of IMI
department, one Mr. Hira Lal, the worker of IMI
department, was sent to the gate office in-connection
with a challan of a water pump. As the worker, i. e.
said Mr. Hira Lal, did not come back to IMI
department for quite some time, Mr. S.K. Bagga,
Junior Engineer of IMI department personally went
to the gate office. He (S.K. Bagga) apprised Mr. Deep
Chand, Senior Security Officer, of the irresponsible
manner in which you delivered the challan to the
person of M/s. Gurumukh Dass instead of to IMI
department. When Mr. Deep Chand further verified
this fact from you, you showed ignorance and
demanded to know the name of the person who had
said so. When informed that it was Durg Singh you
without any rhyme or reason or provocation abused
Shri Durg Singh in a filthy manner saying (translated
in English as -I fuck the mother of Durg Singh; bring
him). You were advised that being a responsible
employee and that too belonging to the security
department, you should not abuse any employee
but you continued in hot temper and demanded Mr.
Durg Singh to be called in the gate office. When Shri
Durg Singh was brought and in your presence he
once again confirmed and reiterated that you had
given the challan to the person of M/s. Gurumukh
Dass, you lost all your senses and started abusing
Shri S.K. Bagga left and right in as filthy derogatory
and abusive manner. You said (translated in English
as-you should try hard to your gandh; you cannot
do anything wrong to meet you may go to Ram
Kumar or you may go to Vijay Kumar).
4204
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
50. mDr ekeys esa mDr vkjksi ds lUnHkZ esa n.M+ ds lEcU/
esa fopkj djrs gq, ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; us ;g vfHkfu/kZfjr
fd;k gS fd%—
‘‘There is nothing on record to show that any
previous adverse remark against the appellant had
been taken into consideration by the management
for awarding the extreme penalty of dismissal from
service to the appellant even if he had in fact abused
in filthy language Durg Singh and S.K. Bagga. We
are, therefore, of the opinion that the punishment
awarded to the appellant is shockingly
disproportionate regard being had to the charge
framed against him. We are also of the opinion that
no responsible employer would ever impose in like
circumstances the punishment of dismissal to the
employee and that victimization or unfair labour
practice could well be inferred from the conduct of
the management in awarding the extreme punishment
of dismissal for a flimsy charge of abuse of some
worker or officer of the management by the appellant
within the premises of the factory. We, therefore,
hold that the termination of the appellant’s service is
invalid and unsustainable in law.”
51. 1996 (1) LLN 14 Ram Kishan V/s. Union of India
and Others esa iqfyl ds flikgh }kjk mPp vf/dkjh dks xkyh nsus
dk ekeyk Fkk A n.M dh vuuqikfrdrk ij fopkj djrs gq,
ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; us ;g vfHkfu/kZfjr fd;k gS fd%&
‘‘When abusive language in used by any body
against a superior, it must be understood in the
environment in which that person is situated and the
circumstances surrounding the event that led to the
use of the abusive language. No straight-jacket
formula could be evolved in adjudging whether the
abusive language in the given circumstances would
warrant dismissal from service, Each case has to be
considered on its own facts.”
‘‘What was the nature of the abusive language used
by the appellant was not stated. On the facts of this
case held that dismissal from service is harsh and
disproportionate to gravity of charge. Imposition of
stoppage of two increments with cumulative effect
would be appropriate punishment.”
52. 1983 FLR (62) 100 (SC) jekdkUr feJk cuke mÙkj
izns'k jkT; ds ekeys esa osru esa vuqifLFkfr o foyEc ls mifLFkr
gksus ds lEcU/ esa dVkSrh djus ls ukjkt gksdj vipkjh us mPp
vf/dkjh dks fuEu vHkæ 'kCn dgs Fks %&
‘‘Are other persons your father ? I will make you
forget your high handeness either here or somewhere
else. An Officer of yesterday’s making discloses
power consciousness”
53. ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; us mDr vkjksi ds fy, lsok ls
c[kkZLrxh ds vkns'k dks mfpr ugha ekurs gq, vfHkfu/kZfjr fd;k gS
fd%&
‘‘Appellant was Secretary of the workmen’s Union.
The respondent-management has not shown that
there was any blameworthy conduct of the appellant
during the period of 14 years service he rendered
prior to the date of misconduct and the misconduct
consists of language indiscreet, improper of
disclosing a threatening posture. When it is said
that language discloses a threatening posture it is
the subjective conclusion of the person who hears
the language because voice modulation of each
person in the society differs and indiscreet, improper,
abusive language may show lack of culture but merely
the use of such language on one occasion
unconnected with any subsequent positive action
and not preceded by any blameworthy conduct
cannot permit an extreme penalty of dismissal from
service. Therefore, we are satisfied that the order of
dismissal was not justified in the facts and
circumstances of the case and the Court must
interfere.”
54. vf/fu;e dh /kjk 11&A ds vUrxZr mUekspu ;k gVk;s
tkus ds LFkku ij de n.M vf/jksfir djus dh 'kfDr vf/dj.k
dks iznÙk dh xbZ gS A ;g lgh gS fd vuq'kklukRed izkf/dkjh }kjk
vf/jksfir fd, x;s n.M ds lkFk gLr{ksi djus dh ;g 'kfDr
lhfer gsS A ;g Hkh lgh gS fd n.M dks vlaxr gksuk ;k vU; dksbZ
vYihdj.k ifjfLFkfr ;k deZdkj dk iwoZ vkpj.k tSls dkj.kksa ds
vHkko esa dsoy lgkuqHkwfr ds vk/kj ij mDr iznÙk 'kfDr dk
iz;ksx djuk visf{kr ugha gS A ysfdu tgk¡ lsok ls mUeksfpr ls
vf/jksfir n.M vkjksiksa dks ns[krs gq, n.M dBksj o vuqikfrd gks
rks ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; ds mDr U;k;n`"VkUrksa esa izfrikfnr
fl¼kUrksa ds vuqlkj mls de n.M+ esa ifjo£rr fd;k tk ldrk
gS A
55- orZeku ekeys esa izkFkhZ ij vkjksi Fkk fd mlus lgkjk
bf.M+;k ds izfrfuf/ ls udn jkf'k izkIr dj tek djus ls bUdkj
fd;k rFkk eSustj ds funsZ'k fn;s tkus ds ckn ml jkf'k dks tek
fd;k A ml ij ;g Hkh vkjksi Fkk fd mlus R.S.R.T.C. ds
izfrfuf/ ls Hkh udn jkf'k izkIr dj tek djus dh ctk; mls czkUPk
eSustj ls lEidZ djus ds fy, dgk A og mlds }kjk funsZ'k nsus ds
ckn Hkh jkf'k dks tek ugha fd;k x;k rFkk fyf[kr funsZ'k fns, tkus
ls mÙksftr gksdj czkUp eSustj ds lkFk xkyh&xykSp okys 'kCnksa dk
iz;ksx fd;k A vkjksi esa ;g ugha crk;k x;k gS fd fdu xkyh&xykSp
okys 'kCnksa dk iz;ksx fd;k x;k A blds vykok izkFkhZ dh yEch
lsok vof/ ds nkSjku iwoZ esa mlds }kjk nqO;Zogkj djus ds dksbZ rF;
vfHkys[k ij ugha vk, gaS A izkFkhZ ij fdlh jkf'k dk nq£ofu;ksx
djus ;k vizkFkhZ dks /ks[kk dkfjr djus dk ekeyk ugha gS A vr%
orZeku ekeys esa izkFkhZ ij tks vkjksi lkfcr ik;s x;s gSa mudks
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935
4205
n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, izkFkhZ dks lsok esa mUeksfpr djus dk n.M+ dBksj
o vuqikfrd gksuk izrhr gksrk gS A
56- izkFkhZ dks ftu vkjksiksa ds fy, nks"kfl¼ ik;k gS mudks
ns[krs gq, ml ij vf/jksfir lsok ls mUeqDr djus dk n.M dBksj
,oa vuuqikfrd gS rFkk izkFkhZ dk iwoZ lsok jsdkMZ csnkx ugha jgk ;k
iwoZ vkpj.k [kjkc jgk gks ,slk Hkh dksbZ vfHkdFku izkFkhZ ds fo#¼
ugha gS] blfy, leLr rF;ksa ij lexz :i ls fopkj djrs gq, izkFkhZ
dks lsok ls mUeksfpr djus ds vf/jksfir n.M dks vikLr dj fcuk
cdk;k osru ls lsok esa cgky djrs gq, rhu ok£"kd&o`f¼ lap;h
izHkko ls jksdus dk n.M fn;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr gksxk A
57- rnuqlkj] ;g r; fd;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZ dks lsok ls
^fMLpktZ* djus dk n.M dBksj o vuuqikfrd gksus ds dkj.k
vkns'k fnukad 6&4&2004 }kjk vf/jksfir n.M+ U;k;ksfpr ugha gS A
mDr vkns'k esa vf/jksfir n.M dks vikLr dj izkFkhZ ij mls ns;
rhu ok£"kd osru o`f¼;k¡ lap;h izHkko ls jksdus dk n.M+ vf/jksfir
fd;k tkrk gS A izkFkhZ lsok esa fujUrjrk ds lkFk iqu% cgky gksus dk
vf/dkjh gS A rFkkfi] izkFkhZ cdk;k osru dh jkf'k izkIr djus dk
vf/dkjh ugha gksxk A U;k;fu.kZ;u gsrq izsf"kr funsZ'k (jsiQjsUl)dk
mÙkj mDr izdkj fn;k tkrk gS A iapkV rnkuqlkj ikfjr fd;k tkrk
gS A
59- iapkV dh izfrfyfi dsUnzh; ljdkj dks vkS|ksfxd fookn
vf/fu;e] 1947 dh /kjk 17(1) ds vUrxZr izdk'kukFkZ izsf"kr dh
tkos A
,u- ds- iqjksfgr] ihBklhu vf/dkjh
ubZ fnYyh] 16 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1610-—dsUæ ljdkj] lwpuk dk vf/dkj
vf/fu;e] 2005 (2005 dh la[;k 22) dh /kjk 2 (x) ds lkFk
ifBr /kjk 5(1) ds vUrxZr iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,
vkSj fnukad 11 tuojh] 2011 dh lela[;d vf/lwpuk dk
vf/Øe.k djrs gq, Je vkSj jkstxkj ea=kky; esa Jh pkuu jke]
funs'kd] Je vkSj jkstxkj ea=kky; dks bl ea=kky; vkSj bl
ea=kky; ds laj{k.k ds v/hu lac¼ dk;kZy;ksa@Lok;r laxBuksa ds
laca/ esa uksMy vf/dkjh ds :i esa ukeksfn"V djrh gS vkSj og
bl ea=kky; ds laj{k.k ds v/hu tu izkf/dkfj;ksa }kjk dh xbZ lHkh
dkjZokb;ksa dk leUo;u Hkh djsaxs rFkk mDr vf/fu;e ds iz;kstukFkZ
dk;Z dj jgs dsUnzh; tu lwpuk vf/dkfj;ksa (lhihvkbZvks) rFkk
lgk;d dsUnzh; tu lwpuk vf/dkfj;ksa (lhihvkbZvks) dks ukeksfn"V
djus ds ckjs esa Je vkSj jkstxkj ea=kky; ds varxZr tu izkfèkdkfj;ksa
}kjk dh xbZ dkjZokb;ksa dk leUo; Hkh djsaxs A
2- uksMy vf/dkjh ds lkFk vkjVhvkbZ vkSj fof/d izdks"B]
lwpuk dk vf/dkj vf/fu;e] 2005 ds vUrxZr lHkh dsUnzh;
tu lwpuk vf/dkfj;ksa dh rjiQ ls vuqjks/ksa dks izkIr djus gsrq
izkf/dkfj;ksa ds lkFk dsUnzh; fcUnq gksaxs rFkk mUgsa lacaf/r tu lwpuk
vf/dkjh dks vxzsf"kr djsasxs A Je vkSj jkstxkj ea=kky; (eq[;
lfpoky;) ls lacaf/r lwpuk izkIr djus gsrq vuqjks/ /kjk 6 dh
mi&/kjk (1) ds varxZr mfpr jlhn ds ekè;e ls udn vFkok
osru ,oa ys[kk vf/dkjh (eq[; lfpoky;) Je ,oa jkstxkj
ea=kky; dks ns; fMekaM MªkÝV vFkok cSadlZ pSd vFkok Hkkjrh;
iksLVy vkMZj }kjk nl (10) #i;s ds vkosnu 'kqYd ds lkFk Hksts
tk,a A
3- MkW- vuwi pUn ik.Ms] la;qDr lfpo] Hkkjr ljdkj vxys
vkns'kksa rd Je ,oa jkstxkj ea=kky; ds laca/ eas lwpuk dk
vf/dkj vf/fu;e] 2005 dh /kjk 19(1) ds iz;kstukFkZ ofj"B
vf/dkjh jgsaxs A
4- ;g lfpo] Je ,oa jkstxkj ea=kky; ds vuqeksnu ls tkjh
fd;k tkrk gS A
¹la- tSM&20025@18@2005&iz'kk- Iº
iou dqekj] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 16th July, 2013
S.O. 1610.—In exercise of the powers conferred
under Section 5(1) read with Section 2(C) of the Right to
Information Act, 2005 (No. 22 of 2005) and in supersession
of Notification of even number date 11th January 2011,
the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour and
Employment designate Shri Chanan Ram, Director, Ministry
of Labour and Employment as Nodal Officer for the purpose
of Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect to this Ministry
and Attached offices/Autonomous organizations under
the aegis of this Ministry and will also co-ordinate all
actions taken up by the public authorites under the aegis
of this Ministry and will also coordinate all actions
taken up by the public authorities under the Ministry of
Labour and Employment regarding designating the CPIOs
and ACP IOs for carring out the purpose of the said act.
2. RTI & Legal cell along with Nodal Officer will be
the Central point with the authority to receive the requests
under the RTI Act, 2005 on behalf of all CPIOs and forward
the same to the cocerned CPIO. A request for obtaining
information pertaining to Ministry of Labour and
Employment (Main Sectt.) under section (1) of section 6
shall be accompanied by an application fee of Rupees ten
(10) by way of cash through proper receipt or by Demand
Draft of Bankers Cheque or Indian Postal Order payable to
PAO (MS), Ministry of Labour and Employment, Shram
Shakti, Rafi Marg, New Delhi-110001.
3. Dr. Anoop Chander Pandey, Joint Secretary to the
Government of India shall continue to be Senior Officer
for the purpose of section 19(1) of the Right to Information
Act, 2005 with respect to Ministry of Labour and
Employment till further orders.
4. This has the approval of Secretary, Ministry of
Labour and Employment.
[No. Z-20025/18/2005-Adm.I]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
4206
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ubZ fnYyh] 23 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1611-—jk"Vªifr] lqJh ds- ih- izlUuk dqekjh] dks
17&7&2013 (iwokZg~u) ls dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd U;k;kf/dj.k&lg
Je U;k;ky;] psUubZ] ds ihBklhu vf/dkjh ds :i esa 11&09&2017
rd vFkok vxys vkns'kksa rd] tks Hkh igys gks] fu;qDr djrs gSa A
¹la- ,&11016@2@2012&lh,y,l&IIº
jkts'k dqekj] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 23rd July, 2013
S.O. 1611.—The President is pleased to appoint
Ms. K. P. Prasanna Kumari as Presiding Officer of the
Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,
Chennai w.e.f. 17-07-2013 (F.N.) for a period upto
11-09-2017 or until further orders, which is earlier.
[No. A-11016/2/2012-CLS-II]
RAJESH KUMAR, Under Secy.
ubZ fnYyh] 26 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1612-—tcfd eSllZ bafM;u ,DlIyksflOl fy-
¹dksM la[;k MCY;w ch@8217 ds varxZr ,lvkjvks gkoMk esaº
(,rnqijkUr izfr"Bku ds :i esa lan£Hkr) us deZpkjh Hkfo"; fuf/
,oa izdh.kZ mica/ vf/fu;e] 1962 (1962 dk 19) (,rnqijkUr
vf/fu;e ds :i esa lan£Hkr) dh /kjk 17 dh mi&/kjk (1) ds
[k.M (d) ds varxZr NwV ds fy, vkosnu fd;k gS A
2- vkSj tcfd dsUnzh; ljdkj ds fopkj esa] va'knku dh
njksa ds laca/ esa mDr izfr"Bku ds Hkfo"; fuf/ fu;e mDr
vf/fu;e dh /kjk 6 esa fofu£n"V fu;eksa dh rqyuk esa deZpkfj;ksa
ds fy, de mi;qDr ugha gaS vkSj deZpkjh mDr vf/fu;e vFkok
deZpkjh Hkfo"; fuf/ ;kstuk] 1952 (,rnqijkar ;kstuk ds :i esa
lan£Hkr)ds varxZr ln`'k Lo:i ds fdlh vU; izfr"Bku esa deZpkfj;ksa
ds laca/ esa nh tkus okyh vU; Hkfo"; fuf/ izlqfo/kvksa dk Hkh ykHk
mBk jgs gSa A
3- vr% dsUnzh; ljdkj] vc mDr vf/fu;e dh /kjk 17
dh mi&/kjk (1) ds [k.M (d) n~okjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx
djrs gq, bl laca/ esa le;≤ ij fofu£n"V 'krks± ds vè;/hu]
mDr izfr"Bku dks 1&5&1962 ls vxyh vf/lwpuk rd mDr
;kstuk ds lHkh mica/ksa ds izHkko ls NwV iznku djrh gS A
¹la- ,l&35015@16@2013&,l,l&IIº
lqHkk"k dqekj] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 26th July, 2013
S.O. 1612.—Whereas M/s. Indian Explosives Ltd.
[under Code No. WB/8217 in SRO, Howrah] (hereinafter
referred to as the establishment) has applied for exemption
under clause (a) of sub-section (1) of section 17 of the
Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions
Act, 1952 (19 of 1952 ) (hereinafter referred to as the Act).
2. And whereas in the opinion of the Central
Government, the rules of the provident fund of the said
establishment with respect to the rates of contribution are
not less favourable to employees therein than those
specified in section 6 of the said Act and the employees
are also in enjoyment of other provident fund benefits
provided under the said Act or under the Employees’
Provident Funds Scheme, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as
the Scheme) in relation to the employees in any other
establishment of similar character.
3. Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred
by clause (a) of sub-section (1) of section 17 of the said
Act and subject to the conditions specified in this regard
from time to time, the Central Government, hereby exempts
the said establishment from the operation of all the
provisions of the said Scheme with effect from 01-05-1962
until further notification.
[No. S-35015/16/2013-SS-II]
SUBHASH KUMAR, Under Secy.
Printed by the Manager, Government of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi-110064
and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi-110054.