jftLVªh la- Mh- ,y- (,u) 04@0007@2003µ05

REGD. NO. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05

izkf/dkj ls izdkf'kr

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

lkIrkfgd

WEEKLY

la- 31]

ubZ fnYyh, tqykbZ 28—vxLr 3] 2013] '[email protected] 6—Jko.k 12] 1935

No. 31]

NEW DELHI, JULY 28—AUGUST 3, 2013, SATURDAY/SRAVANA 6—SRAVANA 12, 1935

Hkkx esa fHkUu i`"B la[;k nh tkrh gS ftlls fd ;g i`Fkd ladyu ds :i esa j[kk tk lds

Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

Hkkx II—[k.M 3—mi&[k.M (ii)

PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)

Hkkjr ljdkj ds ea=kky;ksa (j{kk ea=kky; dks NksM+dj) }kjk tkjh fd, x, lkafof/d vkns'k vkSj vf/lwpuk,a

Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India

(Other than the Ministry of Defence)

dk£ed] yksd f'kdk;r rFkk isa'ku ea=kky;

(dk£ed vkSj izf'k{k.k foHkkx)

ubZ fnYyh] 24 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1502-—dsaæh; ljdkj ,rn~}kjk fnYyh fo'ks"k

iqfyl LFkkiuk vf/fu;e] 1946 (1946 dk vf/fu;e la- 25)

dh /kjk 6 ds lkFk ifBr /kjk 5 dh mi&/kjk (1) }kjk iznÙk

'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, dsjy jkT; ljdkj] x`g (,e) foHkkx]

fr:ouariqje dh fnukad 22 twu] 2013 dh vf/lwpuk th-vks-

(,e-,l-) la- 158@2013@x`g }kjk izkIr lgefr ls voS/ ekuo

rLdjh ls lacaf/r iqfyl Fkkuk usMqEck'ksjh esa iathÑr ekeyk

vijk/ la[;k 1568@12 ,oa 835@2012 rFkk iqfyl eq[;ky;]

vijk/ 'kk[kk] fr:ouariqje esa iathÑr ekeyk vijk/ la[;k

726@lhvkj@vkslhMCY;w&II@bZds,e@2012 ,oa 755@lh vkj@vks lh

MCY;w&II@bZ osQ ,e@2012 esa rFkk mi;qZDr mfYyf[kr vijk/ksa ls

lacaf/r ;k muls lEc¼ vijk/ksa esa fd, x, iz;klksa] nq"izsj.kkvksa

vkSj "kM~;a=kksa rFkk mlh laO;ogkj esa fd, x, ;k mUgh rF;ksa ls

mRiUu fdlh vU; vijk/ ;k vijk/ksa dk iathdj.k@vUos"k.k djus

ds fy, fnYyh fo'ks"k iqfyl LFkkiuk ds lnL;ksa dh 'kfDRk;ksa vkSj

{ks=kkf/dkj dk foLrkj leLr dsjy jkT; ds lEcU/ esa djrh gS A

¹ la- 228@38@2013&, oh Mh&II)º

jktho tSu] voj lfpo

3196 GI/2013

(3739)

MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES

AND PENSIONS

(Department of Personnel and Training)

New Delhi, the 24th July, 2013

S.O. 1502.—In exercise of the powers conferred

by sub-section (1) of Section 5 read with section 6 of the

Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (Act No. 25

of 1946), the Central Government with the consent of the

State Government of Kerala, Home (M) Department.

Thiruvananthapuram vide Notification G.O. (Ms.)

No. 158/2013/Home, dated 22nd June, 2013, hereby extends

the powers and Jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi

Special Police Establishment to the whole of the State of

Kerala for registration/investigation of cases Crime Nos.

1568/12 and 835/2012 registered at Police Station

Nedumbassery and cases Crime Nos, 726/CR/OCW-II/

EKM/2012 and 755CR/OCW-II/EKM/2012 registered at

Police Headquarters, Crime Branch Thruvananthapuram

relating to illegal human trafficking and attempts, abetments

and conspiracy in relation to or connection with the above

mentioned offences and any other offence or offences

committed in the course of the same transaction or arising

out of the same facts.

[ No. 228/38/2013-AVD-II]

RAJIV JAIN, Under Secy.

3740

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ubZ fnYyh] 24 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1503-—dsaæh; ljdkj ,rn~}kjk fnYyh fo'ks"k

iqfyl LFkkiuk vf/fu;e] 1946 (1946 dk vf/fu;e la- 25)

dh /kjk 6 ds lkFk ifBr /kjk 5 dh mi&/kjk (1) }kjk iznÙk

'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, dsjy jkT; ljdkj] x`g (,e) foHkkx]

fr:ouariqje dh fnukad 3 ebZ] 2013 dh vf/lwpuk la- th-vks-

(,e-,l-) la- 120@2013@x`g] ,lvkjvks la- 407@2013 }kjk izkIr

lgefr ls dsjy jkT; fo|qr cksMZ] xqtjkr mQtkZ fy- ,oa mM+hlk iu

mQtkZ fuxe dks la;qDr :i ls vkoafVr cSrj.kh osLV dksy CykWd esa

fdlh Hkh vfu;ferk ls lEc¼ iz;kl] nq"izsj.kk rFkk "kM~;a=k rFkk

mlh laO;ogkj ds Øe esa fy, x, ;k mUgha rF;ksa ls mRiUu fdlh

vU; vijk/ ;k vijk/ksa dk] dsanz ;k jkT; ds fdlh vf/fu;e ds

v/hu vUos"k.k djus ds laca/ esa fnYyh fo'ks"k iqfyl LFkkiuk ds

lnL;ksa dh 'kfDr;ksa vkSj {ks=kkf/dkj dk foLrkj lEiw.kZ dsjy jkT;

esa djrh gS A

¹ la- 228@3@2013&, oh Mh&IIº

jktho tSu] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 24th July, 2013

S.O. 1503.—In exercise of the powers conferred

by sub-section (1) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the

Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (Act No. 25

of 1946), the Central Government with consent of the State

Government of Kerala, Home (M) Department.

Thiruvananthapuram, vide S.R.O. No. 407/2013,

Notification G.O. (Ms.) No. 120/2013/Home dated 3rd May,

2013, hereby extends the powers and Jurisdiction of the

members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the

whole of the State of Kerala for investigation into any

irregularities in the joint allocation of Baitarni West Coal

Block to Kerala State Electricity Board, Gujarat Power

Corporation Limited and Orissa Hydro Power Corporation

and attempts, abetments and consipiracy in relation to or

in connection with the above mentioned offences and

any other offence or offences committed in the course of

the same transaction or arising out of the same facts.

[No. 228/3/2013-AVD-II]

RAJIV JAIN, Under Secy.

ubZ fnYyh] 25 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1504-—dsaæh; ljdkj ,rn~}kjk naM izfØ;k lafgrk]

1973 (1974 dk vf/fu;e la- 2) dh /kjk 24 dh mi&/kjk (8)

}kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, ,rn~}kjk] vkjlh

5(,l)@2011&eqe- (b'kjr tgka eqBHksM+ ekeyk) esa rFkk vihyksa]

iqujh{k.kksa ;k mlls lacaf/r ;k lac¼ vU; ekeyksa esa ds-v- C;wjks

dh vksj ls xqtjkr ds ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; ds le{k mifLFkr

gksus ds fy, Jherh bafnjk t;¯lg] Hkkjr dh vij egkU;k;oknh

dks fo'ks"k vfHk;kstd fu;qfDr djrh gS A

¹la- 225@40@2013&, oh Mh&IIº

jktho tSu] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 25th July, 2013

S.O. 1504.—In exercise of the powers conferred

by sub-section (8) of Section 24 of the Code of Criminal

Procedure, 1973 (Act No. 2 of 1974), the Central

Government hereby appoints Smt. Indira Jaisingh,

Additional Solicitor General of India as Special Public

Prosecutor for appearing on behalf of CBI in RC 5(S)/

2011-Mum (Ishrat Jahan encounter case) before the

Hon’ble High Court of Gujarat and appeals, revisions or

other matter connected therewith and incidental thereto.

[ No. 225/40/2013-AVD-II]

RAJIV JAIN, Under Secy.

foÙk ea=kky;

(jktLo foHkkx)

eq[; vk;qDr lhek&'kqYd dk dk;kZy;

psUuS] 22 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1505-—Hkkjr ljdkj] foÙk ea=kky;] jktLo foHkkx]

ubZ fnYyh n~okjk fnukad 01&07&1994 dh vf/lwpuk la-

33@94&lhek&'kqYd (,u-Vh-) ds rgr v/ksgLrk{kjh dks iznÙk

vf/dkjksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, rFkk fnukad 07&03&2002 dh

vf/lwpuk la- 14 ,oa 15@2002&lh-'kq- (,u-Vh-) ds lkFk ifBr

lhek&'kqYd vf/fu;e] 1962 dh /kjk 152 ds [kaM (d) ds

v/hu] eSa] ekyk JhokLro] eq[; vk;qDr] lhek&'kqYd] lhek&'kqYd

Hkou] psUuS] ,rn~}kjk rfeyukMq jkT;] fr:oYYkqoj ftyk esa iksUusjh

rkywd esa fLFkr ^^dkVVqiYyh xzke** dks lhek&'kqYd vf/fu;e]

1962 dh /kjk 9 ds varxZr HkkaMkxkj.k LVs'ku ?kksf"kr djrh gw¡ A

¹iQk- la- 2@90@2013&eq-vk-dk- (iz'kk-)º

ekyk JhokLrok] eq[; vk;qDr

MINISTRY OF FINANCE

(Department of Revenue )

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF

CUSTOMS

Chennai, the 22nd July, 2013

S.O. 1505.—In exercise of the powers delegated

to the undersigned vide Notification No. 33/94-Customs

(NT) dated 1st July, 1994 by the Government of India,

Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, New Delhi

under clause (a) of Section 152 of the Customs Act, 1962

read with Notification Nos. 14 and 15/2002-Cus.(NT), dated

7-3-2002 as amended, I, Mala Srivastava, Chief

Commissioner of Customs, Custom House, Chennai hereby

declare ‘‘Kattupalli Village” Ponneri Taluk in Tiruvallur

District, State of Tamil Nadu, to be a warehousing station

under Section 9 of the Customs Act, 1962.

[ F. No. 2 /90/2013-CCO(Admn.)]

MALA SRIVASTAVA, Chief Commissioner

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3741

dk;kZy; eq[; vk;dj vk;qDr

t;iqj] 22 tqykbZ] 2013

la- 05@2013&14

dk-vk- 1506-—vk;dj fu;e] 1962 ds fu;e 2lh , ds

lkFk iBuh; vk;dj vf/fu;e 1961 (1961 dk 43oka) dh /kjk

10 ds [k.M (23 lh) dh mi&[k.M (vi) ds n~okjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa

dk iz;ksx djrs gq, eq[; vk;dj vk;qDr] t;iqj ,rn~}kjk fnukad

20&04&2012 ,oa vkxs ds fy;s dfFkr /kjk ds mís'; ls ¶fpYMsªu

,dsMseh lkslkbVh] vyoj¸ (LFkkbZ [kkrk la[;k&AAATC9914F)

dks Lohd`fr nsrs gSa A

2- c'krsZ fd lfefr vk;dj fu;e] 1962 ds fu;e 2 lh ,

ds lkFk iBuh; vk;dj vf/fu;e] 1961 dh /kjk 10 ds mi&[kaM

(23lh) dh mi&/kjk (vi) ds çko/kuksa ds vuq:i dk;Z djsas A

¹Øekd% eqvkvk@vvkvk@(eq-)@t;@10(23lh)(vi)@13&14@2168º

vrqys'k ¯tny] eq[; vk;dj vk;qDr

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME

TAX

Jaipur, the 22nd July, 2013

No. 05/2013-14

S.O. 1506.—In exercise of the powers conferred

by sub-clause (vi) of clause (23C) of Section 10 of the

Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961) read with rule 2CA of the

Incom-tax Rules, 1962 the Chief Commissioner of

Income-tax, Jaipur hereby approves “M/s Children

Academy Society, Alwar” for the purpose of said section

for with effect from 20-4-2012 and onwards:

Provided that the society conforms to and complies

with the provisions of sub-clause (vi) of clause (23C) of

Section 10 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 read with rule 2CA

of the Income-tax Rules, 1962.

[No. CCIT/JPR/ITO(Tech.)/10(23C)(vi)/2013-14/2168]

ATULESH JINDAL, Chief Commissioner of Income-tax

t;iqj 22 tqykbZ] 2013

la- 03@2013&14

dk-vk- 1507-—vk;dj fu;e] 1962 ds fu;e 2lh , ds

lkFk iBuh; vk;dj vf/fu;e] 1961 (1961 dk 43oka) dh /kjk

10 ds [k.M (23 lh) dh mi/kjk (vi) ds n~okjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa

dk iz;ksx djrs gq, eq[; vk;dj vk;qDr] t;iqj ,rn~}kjk

fu/kZj.k o"kZ 2012&13 ,oa vkxs ds fy, dfFkr /kjk ds mís'; ls

¶lkekftd vuqla/ku fodkl lfefr] t;iqj¸ (LFkkbZ [kkrk

la[;k&AADTS8652F) dks Lohd`fr nsrs gSa %

c'krsZ fd lfefr vk;dj fu;e] 1962 ds fu;e 2 lh , ds

lkFk iBuh; vk;dj vf/fu;e] 1961 dh /kjk 10 ds [kaM

(23lh) dh mi&/kjk (vi) ds çko/kuksa ds vuq:i dk;Z djs A

¹Øekad% eqvkvk@vvkvk@(eq-)@t;@10(23lh)(vi)@13&14@2169º

vrqys'k ¯tny] eq[; vk;dj vk;qDr

Jaipur, the 22nd July, 2013

No. 03/2013-14

S.O. 1507.—In exercise of the powers conferred

by sub-clause (vi) of clause (23C) of Section 10 of the

Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961) read with rule 2CA of the

Incom-tax Rules, 1962 the Chief Commissioner of

Income-tax, Jaipur hereby approves “Samajik Anusandhan

Vikas Samiti, Jaipur” for the purpose of said Section for

the A.Y. 2012-13 onwards :

Provided that the society conforms to and complies

with the provisions of sub-clause (vi) of clause (23C) of

Section 10 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 read with rule 2CA

of the Income-tax Rules, 1962.

[No. CCIT/JPR/ITO(Tech.)/10(23C)(vi)/2013-14/2169]

ATULESH JINDAL, Chief Commissioner of Income-tax

t;iqj] 22 tqykbZ] 2013

la- 04@2013&14

dk-vk- 1508-—vk;dj fu;e] 1962 ds fu;e 2 lh , ds

lkFk iBuh; vk;dj vf/fu;e] 1961 (1961 dk 43oka) dh /kjk

10 ds [k.M (23 lh) dh mi&/kjk (6) ds }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk

iz;ksx djrs gq, eq[; vk;dj vk;qDr] t;iqj ,rn~}kjk fu/kZj.k

o"kZ 2012&13 ,oa vkxs ds fy;s dfFkr /kjk ds mís'; ls ^^eS- lkbZu

bUVjus'kuy ,UVjizkbtst] t;iqj** (LFkkbZ [kkrk la[;k&AAHTS

4207 N) dks LohÑfr nsrs gSa A

2- c'krsZ fd lfefr vk;dj fu;e] 1962 ds fu;e 2 lh ,

ds lkFk iBuh; vk;dj vf/fu;e] 1961 dh /kjk 10 ds mi[kaM

(23lh) dh mi&/kjk (vi) ds izko/kuksa ds vuq:i dk;Z djs A

¹Øekad % eqvkvk@vvkvk@(eq-)t;@10(23lh)

(vi)@2013&14@2170º

vrqys'k ¯tny] eq[; vk;dj vk;qDr

Jaipur, the 22nd July 2013

No. 04/2013—14

S.O. 1508.—In exercise of the powers conferred

by sub-clause (vi) of clause (23C) of Section 10 of the

Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961) read with rule 2CA of the

Income-tax Rules, 1962 the Chief Commissioner of Income-

tax, Jaipur hereby approves “M/s Sine International

Enterprise, Jaipur” for the purpose of said section for the

A. Y. 2012-13 onwards :

3742

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Provided that the society conforms to and complies

with the provisions of sub-clause (vi) of clause (23C) of

Section 10 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 read with rule 2CA

of the Income-tax Rules, 1962.

[No. CCIT/JPR/ITO (Tech.)/10 (23C) (vi)/2013-14/2170]

ATULESH JINDAL, Chief Commissioner of

Income tax

(foÙkh; lsok,a foHkkx)

ubZ fnYyh] 22 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1509-—Hkkjrh; LVsV cSad (leuq"kaxh cSad) vf/

fu;e] 1959 dh /kjk 26 dh mi&/kjk (2d) ds lkFk ifBr /kjk

25 dh mi&/kjk (1) ds [k.M (xd) }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk

iz;ksx djrs gq,] dsUnzh; ljdkj] ,rn~}kjk] LVsV cSad vkWiQ ifV;kyk

ds fo'ks"k lgk;d Jh ujs'k xkSM+ (tUe frfFk % 21&04&1964)] dks

fnukad 22&07&2013 ls ;k mudh fu;qfDr dh vf/lwpuk dh

rkjh[k ls rhu o"kZ dh vof/ ds fy, vFkok LVsV cSad vkWiQ

ifV;kyk ds deZdkj deZpkjh ds :i esa muds in ij cus jgus rd

vFkok vkxkeh vkns'kksa rd] buesa ls tks Hkh igys gks] LVsV cSad

vkWiQ ifV;kyk ds funs'kd e.My esa deZdkj deZpkjh funs'kd

fu;qDr djrh gS A

¹iQk- la- 6@26@2012&chvks&Iº

fot; eYgks=kk] voj lfpo

(Department of Financial Services)

New Delhi, the 22nd July, 2013

S.O. 1509.—In pursuance of the clause (CA) of

sub-section (1) of Section 25 read with sub-section (2A)

of Section 26 of the State Bank of India (Subsidiary Banks)

Act, 1959, the Central Government hereby appoints

Shri Naresh Gaur (Date of Birth : 21-04-1964) Special

Assistant, State Bank of Patiala as Workmen Employee

Director on the Board of Directors of State Bank of Patiala

for a period of three years with effect from 22-07-2013 or

till he ceases to be a Workmen Employee of the State Bank

of Patiala, or until further orders, whichever is the earliest.

[F. No. 6/26/2012-BO-I]

VIJAY MALHOTRA, Under Secy.

ubZ fnYyh] 26 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1510-—jk"Vªh; cSad (izca/ ,oa izdh.kZ mica/ )

Ldhe] 1970@1980 ds [kaM 3 ds mi&[kaM (1) ds lkFk ifBr

cSaddkjh daiuh (miØeksa dk vtZu ,oa varj.k) vf/fu;e]

1970@1980 dh /kjk 9 dh mi&/kjk 3 ds [kaM ([k) }kjk iznÙk

'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] dsUnzh; ljdkj] ,rn~}kjk] uhps nh xbZ

lkj.kh ds dkye 2 esa fofu£n"V O;fDr;ksa dks mDr lkj.kh ds

dkye 3 esa fofu£n"V O;fDr;ksa ds LFkku ij dkye (1) esa

fofu£n"V cSadksa esa ljdkj }kjk ukfer funs'kd ds :i esa rRdky

izHkko ls vkSj vxys vkns'k gksus rd] ukfer djrh gS %&

(1)

(2)

(3)

lsUVªy cSad

MkW- ds-ih- Ñ".ku]

Jh vkyksd V.Mu

vkWiQ bafM;k

vij lfpo]

vk£Fkd dk;Z foHkkx

cSad vkWiQ bafM;k Jh vuwi o/kou]

Jh mes'k dqekj

la;qDr lfpo]

foÙkh; lsok, foHkkx

bafM;u cSad

Jherh lq/k Ñ".ku]

MkW- jtr HkkxZo

la;qDr lfpo]

O;; foHkkx

dsujk cSad

MkW- jtr HkkxZo]

Jherh lq/k Ñ".ku

la;qDr lfpo]

vk£Fkd dk;Z foHkkx

¹iQk- la- 6@3@2012&chvks&Iº

Js;k xqgk] funs'kd

New Delhi, the 26th July, 2013

S.O. 1510.—In exercise of the powers conferred by

clause (b) of sub-section (3) of Section 9 of the The

Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of

Undertakings) Act, 1970/1980, read with sub-clause (1) of

clause 3 of the Nationalised Banks (Management and

Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970/1980, the Central

Government, hereby nominate the persons specified in

column 2 of the table bwlow as Government Nominee

Director of the Banks specified in column 1 thereof, in

place of persons specified in column 3 of the said table,

with immediate effect and until further order :—

(1)

(2)

(3)

Central Bank

Dr. K. P. Krishnan,

Sh. Alok Tandon

of India

Additional Secretary,

Department of Eco-

nomic Affairs

Bank of

Sh. Anup Wadhawan, Sh. Umesh Kumar

India

Joint Secretary, Deptart-

ment of Financial

Services

Indian Bank

Smt. Sudha

Dr. Rajat Bhargava

Krishnan, Joint

Secretary Depart-

ment Expenditure

Canara Bank

Dr. Rajat Bhargava,

Smt. Sudha Krishnan

Joint Secretary,

Department of

Economic Affairs

[F. No. 6/3/2012-BO-I]

SREYA GUHA, Director

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3743

ubZ fnYyh] 26 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1511-—jk"Vªh; d`f"k vkSj xzkeh.k fodkl cSad

vfèfu;e] 1981 (1981 dk 61) dh /kjk 6 dh mi&/kjk (1) ds

[k.M (?k) }kjk çnÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk ç;ksx djrs gq,] dsUæh; ljdkj]

,rn~}kjk] Jh vjfoUn dqekj la;qDr lfpo] foÙkh; lsok,a foHkkx]

foÙk ea=kky;] ubZ fnYyh dks rRdky çHkko ls vkSj vxys vkns'kksa

rd] Jh mes'k dqekj ds LFkku ij jk"Vªh; d`f"k vkSj xzkeh.k fodkl

cSad (ukckMZ) ds funs'kd e.My esa funs'kd ukfer djrh gS A

¹iQk- la- 6@3@2012&chvks&Iº

Js;k xqgk] funs'kd

New Delhi, the 26th July, 2013

S.O. 1511.—In exercise of the powers conferred

by clause (d) of the sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the

National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development Act,

1981 (61 of 1981), the Central Government, hereby nominate

Shri Arvind Kumar, Joint Secretary, Department of Financial

Services, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi as a Director on

the Board of Directors of the National Bank for Agriculture

and Rural Development (NABARD) with immediate effect

and until further orders vice Shri Umesh Kumar.

[F. No. 6/3/2012-BO-I]

SREYA GUHA, Director

ubZ fnYyh] 30 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1512-—chek fofu;ked vkSj fodkl çkf/dj.k

vf/fu;e] 1999 (1999 dk 41) dh /kjk 4 }kjk çnÙk 'kfDr;ksa

dk ç;ksx djrs gq,] dsUæh; ljdkj] ,rn}kjk Jh vuwi o/kou]

la;qDr lfpo] fofÙk; lsok,a foHkkx] foÙk ea=kky; dks Jh vjfoUn

dqekj ds LFkku ij rRdky çHkko ls vFkok vxys vkns'k gksus rd]

chek fofu;ked vkSj fodkl çkf/dj.k (vkbZvkjMh,) ds

va'kdkfyd lnL; ds :i esa fu;qDr djrh gS A

¹iQk- la- 11@6@2003&chek&IIIº

fç;k dqekj] funs'kd

New Delhi, the 30th July, 2013

S.O. 1512.—In exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 4 of the Insurance Regulatory and Development

Act, 1999 (41 of 1999), the Central Government hereby

appoints Shri Anup Wadhawan, Joint Secretary,

Department of Financial Services, Ministry of Finance as

Part-time Member of the Insurance Regulatory and

Development Authority (IRDA)vice Shri Arvind Kumar,

Joint Secretary, DFS with immediate effect and until further

orders.

[F. No. 11/6/2003-Ins.-III]

PRIYA KUMAR, Director

ubZ fnYyh] 30 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1513-—jk"Vªh; vkokl cSasd vf/fu;e] 1987 (1987

dk 53) dh /kjk 6 dh mi&/kjk (1) ds [k.M (M-) }kjk çnÙk

'kfDr;ksa dk ç;ksx djrs gq,] dsUæh; ljdkj] ,rn~}kjk

Jh vuqjkx tSu] vkbZ,,l] la;qDr lfpo ds LFkku ij

Jh vjfoUn dqekj] vkbZ,,l] la;qDr lfpo (vkbZ-,iQ-)] foÙkh;

lsok,a foHkkx] foÙk ea=kky;] ubZ fnYyh dks rRdky çHkko ls rFkk

vxys vkns'kksa rd jk"Vªh; vkokl cSad (,u,pch) ds funs'kd

eaMy esa funs'kd ukfer djrh gS A

¹iQk- la- 24@17@2010&vkbZ,iQ&IIº

vrh'k ¯lg] funs'kd (vkbZ,iQ&IIº

New Delhi, the 30th July, 2013

S.O. 1513.—In exercise of the powers conferred by

clause (e) of sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the National

Housing Bank Act, 1987 (53 of 1987), the Central

Government hereby nominates Shri Arvind Kumar, IAS,

Joint Secretary (IF), Department of Financial Services,

Ministry of Finance, New Delhi as a Director on the Board

of Directors of National Housing Bank (NHB) with

immediate effect and until further orders vice Shri Anurag

Jain, IAS, Joint Secretary.

[F. No. 24/17/2010-IF-II]

ATEESH SINGH, Director (IF-II)

ubZ fnYyh] 30 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1514-—o"kZ 2000 esa ;Fkkla'kksf/r Hkkjrh; y?kq

m|ksx fodkl cSad vf/fu;e] 1989] dh /kjk 6(1) (x) }kjk

çnÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk ç;ksx djrs gq,] dsUæh; ljdkj] ,nr~}kjk]

Jh vuqjkx tSu ds LFkku ij Jh vjfoUn dqekj] la;qDr lfpo]

foÙkh; lsok,a foHkkx dks rRdky çHkko ls rFkk vxys vkns'kksa rd

Hkkjrh; y?kq m|ksx fodkl cSad ds funs'kd e.My esa funs'kd ds

:i esa ukfer djrh gS A

¹iQk- la- 24@05@2002&vkbZ,iQ&I ([kaM&IV)º

vrh'k ¯lg] funs'kd (vkbZ,iQ&IIº

New Delhi, the 30th July, 2013

S.O. 1514.—In exercise of the powers conferred by

Section (6) (1) (C) of the Small Industries Development

Bank of India Act, 1989 as amended in the year 2000, the

Central Government hereby nominates, Shri Arvind Kumar,

Joint Secretary, Department of Financial Services, Ministry

of Finance, New Delhi as Director on the Board of Small

Industries Development Bank of India with immediate effect

and until further orders vice Shri Anurag Jain.

[F. No. 24/05/2002-IF-I (Vol. IV)]

ATEESH SINGH, Director (IF-II)

3744

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

fons'k ea=kky;

(lhihoh izHkkx)

ubZ fnYyh] 29 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1515-—jktuf;d vkSj dkSalyh; vkWfiQlj

('kiFk vkSj iQhl) ds vf/fu;e] 1948 (1948 dk 41) dh /kjk

2 ds [kaM (d) ds vuqlj.k esa dsanz ljdkj ,rn~}kjk Jh eksfgrs'k

'kekZ] lgk;d dks 29 tqykbZ] 2013 ls Hkkjr ds dkSalykokl] nqcbZ]

lgk;d dksalqyj vfèkdkjh ds drZO;ksa dk ikyu djus ds fy,

izkf/d`r djrh gS A

¹la- Vh- 4330@1@2006º

vkj- ds- isfjufM;k] mi lfpo (dksalqyj)

MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS

(CPV Division)

New Delhi, the 29th July, 2013

S.O. 1515.— In pursuance of the clause (a) of the

Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular Officers (Oaths

and fees) Act, 1948 (41 of 1948), the Central Government

hereby authorize Shri Mohitesh Sharma, Assistant in

Consulate General of India, Dubai to perform the duties of

Assistant Consular Officer with effect from 29-7-2013.

[No. T. 4330/l/2006]

R. K. PERINDIA, Dy. Secy. (Consular)

LokLF; ,oa ifjokj dY;k.k ea=kky;

(LokLF; ,oa ifjokj dY;k.k foHkkx)

ubZ fnYyh] 23 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1516-—dsUnz ljdkj] Hkkjrh; fpfdRlk ifj"kn~ vf/fu;e] 1956 (1956 dk 102) dh /kjk 12 dh mi&/kjk (2) }kjk iznÙk

'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] Hkkjrh; fpfdRlk ifj"kn~ ls ijke'kZ djus ds ckn] mDr vf/fu;e dh f}rh; vuqlwph esa ,rn~}kjk fuEufyf[kr

la'kks/u djrh gS] uker%—

mDr vuqlwph esa ¶usiky¸ 'kh"kZd ds rgr — ¶f=kHkqou fo'ofo|ky;] usiky¸ ds le{k] 'kh"kZ ^mikf/* ds rgr ¹blds ckn tSlk fd

dkWye (2) esa lan£Hkr gSº] ^fMIyksek esa ;Fkk mfYyf[kr vgZrk dh izÑfr* ¹blds ckn tSlk fd dkWye (3) esa lan£Hkr gSº rFkk ¶laf{kfIr¸

¹blds ckn tSlk fd dkWye (4) esa lan£Hkr gSº] vafre izfof"V vkSj mlls lacaf/r izfof"V ds i'pkr~] fuEufyf[kr izfof"V;ka varLFkkfir

dh tk,zxh] uker%—

(2)

(3)

(4)

^^ ,e Mh (vkarfjd

¶MkDVj vkWiQ esfMflu

f=kHkqou fo'ofo|ky;] usiky

vk;q£oKku)**

(vkarfjd vk;q£oKku)**

¹vk;q£oKku laLFkku] egkjktxat] dkBekaMq] usiky esa

izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa f=kHkqou

fo'ofo|ky;] usiky }kjk o"kZ 1997 esa ;k blds ckn

iznku dh xbZ ;g vgZrk ekU;rkizkIr gksxhº A

lHkh ds fy, fVIi.kh %

1-

izos'k dh la[;k izfro"kZ pkj fo|k£Fk;ksa rd lhfer dj nh xbZ gS A

2-

LukrdksÙkj ikB~;Øe dks iznku dh xbZ ,slh ekU;rk dh vf/dre vof/ 5 o"kks± ds fy, gksxh ftlds mijkUr bldk uohdj.k

djkuk gksxk A

3-

mi&[kaM (4) dh vko';drk ds vuqlkj ekU;rk dk le; ij uohdj.k u djkus ds ifj.kkeLo:i lacaf/r

LukrdksÙkj ikB~;Øe esa izos'k vfuok;Z :i ls can gks tk,azxs A

¹la- oh-&11015@1@2011&,ebZ&ih&Iº

/qzo pØorhZ] voj lfpo

MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE

(Department of Health and Family Welfare)

New Delhi, the 23rd July, 2013

S.O. 1516.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of the Section 12 of the Indian Medical Council

Act, 1956 (102 of 1956), the Central Government, after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby makes the following

further amendments in the Second Schedule to the said Act, namely:—

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3745

In the said Schedule under the heading “Nepal” — against “Tribhuvan University, Nepal”, under the headings

‘Title’ [hereinafter referred to as column (2)], ‘Nature of qualifications as stated in diploma’ [hereinafter referred to as

column (3)] and “Abbreviation” [hereinafter referred to as column (4)], after the last entry and entry relating therto the

following shall be inserted, namely:—

(2)

(3)

(4)

“MD (Internal Medicine)”

“Doctor of Medicine

Tribhuvan University, Nepal

(Internal Medicine)”

[This shall be a recognized qualification when

granted by Tribhuvan University, Nepal in respect

of students being trained at Institute of Medicine,

Maharaj Gunj, Kathmandu, Nepal on or after 1997].

Note to all :

1.

The number of admissions are restricted to Four students per year.

2.

The recognition so granted to a Postgraduate Course shall be for a maximum period of 5 years, upon which it shall

have to be renewed.

3.

Failure to seek timely renewal of recognition as required in sub-clause (4) shall invariably result in

stoppage of admissions to the concerned Postgraduate Course.

[No. V.-11015/1/2011-ME-P-I]

DHRUV CHAKRAVARTY, Under Secy.

ubZ fnYyh] 23 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1517-—dsUnz ljdkj] Hkkjrh; fpfdRlk ifj"kn~ vf/fu;e] 1956 (1956 dk 102) dh /kjk 12 dh mi&/kjk (2) }kjk iznÙk

'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] Hkkjrh; fpfdRlk ifj"kn~ ls ijke'kZ djus ds ckn] mDr vf/fu;e dh f}rh; vuqlwph esa ,rn~}kjk fuEufyf[kr

la'kks/u djrh gS] uker%—

mDr vuqlwph esa ¶usiky¸ 'kh"kZd ds rgr — ¶f=kHkqou fo'ofo|ky;] usiky¸ ds le{k] 'kh"kZ ^mikf/* ds rgr ¹blds ckn tSlk fd

dkWye (2) esa lan£Hkr gSº] ^fMIyksek esa ;Fkk mfYyf[kr vgZrk dh izÑfr* [blds ckn tSlk fd dkWye (3) esa lan£Hkr gS] rFkk ¶laf{kfIr¸

¹blds ckn tSlk fd dkWye (4) esa lan£Hkr gSº] vafre izfof"V vkSj mlls lacaf/r izfof"V ds i'pkr~] fuEufyf[kr izfof"V;ka var%LFkkfir

dh tk,zxh] uker%—

(2)

(3)

(4)

^^ ,e Mh (Mhoh,y)¸

¶MkDVj vkWiQ esfMflu (Ropk foKku

f=kHkqou fo'ofo|ky;] usiky

,oa ;kSu jksx rFkk dq"B jksx foKku)**

¹vk;q£oKku laLFkku] egkjktxat] dkBekaMq] usiky esa

izf'kf{kr d, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa f=kHkqou

fo'ofo|ky;] usiky }kjk o"kZ 2007 esa ;k blds ckn

iznku dh xbZ ;g vgZrk ekU;rkizkIr gksxhº A

lHkh ds fy, fVIi.kh %

1-

izos'k dh la[;k izfro"kZ pkj fo|k£Fk;ksa rd lhfer dj nh xbZ gS A

2-

LukrdksÙkj ikB~;Øe dks iznku dh xbZ ,slh ekU;rk dh vf/dre vof/ 5 o"kks± ds fy, gksxh ftlds mijkUr bldk uohdj.k

djkuk gksxk A

3-

mi&[kaM (4) dh vko';drk ds vuqlkj ekU;rk dk le; ij uohdj.k u djkus ds ifj.kkeLo:i lacaf/r

LukrdksÙkj ikB~;Øe esa izos'k vfuok;Z :i ls can gks tk,azxs A

¹la- oh-&11015@1@2011&,ebZ&ih&Iº

/qzo pØorhZ] voj lfpo

3746

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 23rd July, 2013

S. O. 1517.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of the Section 12 of the Indian Medical Council

Act, 1956 (102 of 1956), the Central Government, after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby makes the following

further amendments in the Second Schedule to the said Act, namely:—

In the said Schedule under the heading “Nepal” — against “Tribhuvan University, Nepal”, under the headings

‘Title’ [hereinafter referred to as column (2)], ‘Nature of qualifications as stated in diploma’ [hereinafter referred to as

column (3)] and “Abbreviation” [hereinafter referred to as column (4)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto the

following shall be inserted, namely:—

(2)

(3)

(4)

“MD (DVL)”

“Doctor of Medicine (Dermatology &

Tribhuvan University, Nepal

Venereology and Leprosy)”

[This shall be recognized qualification when granted

by Tribhuvan University, Nepal in respect of students

being trained at Institute of Medicine, Maharaj Gunj,

Kathmandu, Nepal on or after 2007].

Note to all :

1.

The number of admissions are restricted to Four students per year.

2.

The recognition so granted to a Postgraduate Course shall be for a maximum period of 5 years, upon which it shall

have to be renewed.

3.

Failure to seek timely renewal of recognition as required in sub-clause (4) shall invariably result in

stoppage of admissions to the concerned Postgraduate Course.

[No. V.-11015/1/2011-ME-P-I]

DHRUV CHAKRAVARTY, Under Secy.

ubZ fnYyh] 23 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1518-—dsUnz ljdkj] Hkkjrh; fpfdRlk ifj"kn~ vf/fu;e] 1956 (1956 dk 102) dh /kjk 12 dh mi&/kjk (2) }kjk iznÙk

'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] Hkkjrh; fpfdRlk ifj"kn~ ls ijke'kZ djus ds ckn] mDr vf/fu;e dh f}rh; vuqlwph esa ,rn~}kjk fuEufyf[kr

la'kks/u djrh gS] uker%—

mDr vuqlwph esa ¶usiky¸ 'kh"kZd ds rgr — ¶f=kHkqou fo'ofo|ky;] usiky¸ ds le{k] 'kh"kZ ^mikf/* ds rgr ¹blds ckn tSlk fd

dkWye (2) esa lan£Hkr gSº] ^fMIyksek esa ;Fkk mfYyf[kr vgZrk dh izÑfr* [blds ckn tSlk fd dkWye (3) esa lan£Hkr gS] rFkk ¶laf{kfIr¸

¹blds ckn tSlk fd dkWye (4) esa lan£Hkr gSº] vafre izfof"V vkSj mlls lacaf/r izfof"V ds i'pkr~] fuEufyf[kr izfof"V;ka varLFkkfir

dh tk,zxh] uker%—

(2)

(3)

(4)

^^ ,e ,l (vfLFk foKku)¸

¶ekLVj vkWiQ ltZjh

f=kHkqou fo'ofo|ky;] usiky

(vfLFk foKku)**

¹vk;q£oKku laLFkku] egkjktxat] dkBekaMq] usiky esa

izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa f=kHkqou

fo'ofo|ky;] usiky }kjk o"kZ 2001 esa ;k blds ckn

iznku dh xbZ ;g vgZrk ekU;rkizkIr gksxhº A

lHkh ds fy, fVIi.kh %

1-

izos'k dh la[;k izfro"kZ rhu fo|k£Fk;ksa rd lhfer dj nh xbZ gS A

2-

LukrdksÙkj ikB~;Øe dks iznku dh xbZ ,slh ekU;rk dh vf/dre vof/ 5 o"kks± ds fy, gksxh ftlds mijkUr bldk uohdj.k

djkuk gksxk A

3-

mi&[kaM (4) dh vko';drk ds vuqlkj ekU;rk dk le; ij uohdj.k u djkus ds ifj.kkeLo:i lacaf/r

LukrdksÙkj ikB~;Øe esa izos'k vfuok;Z :i ls can gks tk,azxs A

¹la- oh-&11015@1@2011&,e bZ&ih&Iº

/qzo pØorhZ] voj lfpo

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3747

New Delhi, the 23rd July, 2013

S. O. 1518.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of the Section 12 of the Indian Medical Council

Act, 1956 (102 of 1956), the Central Government, after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby makes the following

further amendments in the Second Schedule to the said Act, namely:—

In the said Schedule under the heading “Nepal” — against “Tribhuvan University, Nepal”, under the headings

‘Title’ [hereinafter referred to as column (2)], ‘Nature of qualifications as stated in diploma’ {hereinafter referred to as

column (3)} and “Abbreviation” [hereinafter referred to as column (4)], after the last entry and entry relating therto the

following shall be inserted, namely:—

(2)

(3)

(4)

“MS (Orthopaedics)”

“Master of Surgery

Tribhuvan University, Nepal

(Orthopaedics)”

[This shall be recognized qualification when granted

by Tribhuvan University, Nepal in respect of students

being trained at Institute of Medicine, Maharaj Gunj,

Kathmandu, Nepal on or after 2001].

Note to all :

1.

The number of admissions are restricted to Three students per year.

2.

The recognition so granted to a Postgraduate Course shall be for a maximum period of 5 years, upon which it shall

have to be renewed.

3.

Failure to seek timely renewal of recognition as required in sub-clause (4) shall invariably result in

stoppage of admissions to the concerned Postgraduate Course.

[No. V.-11015/1/2011-ME-P-I]

DHRUV CHAKRAVARTY, Under Secy.

ubZ fnYyh] 23 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1519-—dsUnz ljdkj] Hkkjrh; fpfdRlk ifj"kn~ vf/fu;e] 1956 (1956 dk 102) dh /kjk 12 dh mi&/kjk (2) }kjk iznÙk

'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] Hkkjrh; fpfdRlk ifj"kn~ ls ijke'kZ djus ds ckn] mDr vf/fu;e dh f}rh; vuqlwph esa ,rn~}kjk fuEufyf[kr

la'kks/u djrh gS] uker%—

mDr vuqlwph esa ¶usiky¸ 'kh"kZd ds rgr — ¶ch-ih- dksbjkyk LokLF; foKku laLFkku] /ju] usiky¸ ds le{k] 'kh"kZ ^mikf/* ds rgr

¹blds ckn tSlk fd dkWye (2) esa lan£Hkr gSº] ^fMIyksek esa ;Fkk mfYyf[kr vgZrk dh izÑfr* {blds ckn tSlk fd dkWye (3) esa lan£Hkr

gS} rFkk ¶laf{kfIr¸ ¹blds ckn tSlk fd dkWye (4) esa lan£Hkr gSº] vafre izfof"V vkSj mlls lacaf/r izfof"V ds i'pkr~] fuEufyf[kr

izfof"V;ka var%LFkkfir dh tk,zxh] uker%—

(2)

(3)

(4)

^^ ,e ,l (vkschth)¸

¶ekLVj vkWiQ ltZjh

ch-ih- dksbjkyk LokLF; foKku laLFkku] /ju] usiky

(izlwfr ,oa L=kh jksx foKku)**

¹ch-ih- dksbjkyk LokLF; foKku laLFkku] /ju] usiky

esa izf'kf{kr fd, tk jgs fo|k£Fk;ksa ds laca/ esa

ch-ih- dksbjkyk LokLF; foKku laLFkku] /ju] usiky

(le fo'ofo|ky;) }kjk o"kZ 2003 esa ;k blds ckn

iznku dh xbZ ;g vgZrk ekU;rkizkIr gksxhº

lHkh ds fy, fVIi.kh %

1-

izos'k dh la[;k izfro"kZ nks fo|k£Fk;ksa rd lhfer dj nh xbZ gS A

2-

LukrdksÙkj ikB~;Øe dks iznku dh xbZ ,slh ekU;rk dh vf/dre vof/ 5 o"kZ ds fy, gksxh ftlds mijkUr bldk uohdj.k

djkuk gksxk A

3748

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

3-

mi&[kaM (4) dh vko';drk ds vuqlkj ekU;rk dk le; ij uohdj.k u djkus ds ifj.kkeLo:i lacaf/r

LukrdksÙkj ikB~;Øe esa izos'k vfuok;Z :i ls can gks tk,azxs A

¹la- oh-&11015@1@2011&,e bZ&ih&Iº

/qzo pØorhZ] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 23rd July, 2013

S. O. 1519.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of the Section 12 of the Indian Medical Council

Act, 1956 (102 of 1956), the Central Government, after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby makes the following

further amendments in the Second Schedule to the said Act, namely:—

In the said Schedule under the heading “Nepal” — against “B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan,

Nepal”, under the headings ‘Title’ [hereinafter referred to as column (2)], ‘Nature of qualifications as stated in diploma’

{hereinafter referred to as column (3)} and “Abbreviation” [hereinafter referred to as column (4)], after the last entry and

entry relating thereto the following shall be inserted, namely:—

(2)

(3)

(4)

“MS (OBG)”

“Master of Surgery

B. P. Koirala Institute of Health

(Obstetrics & Gynecology)”

Sciences, Dharan, Nepal

[This shall be a recognized qualification when

granted by B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences,

Dharan, Nepal (Deemed University) in respect of

students being trained at B. P. Koirala Institute of

Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal on or after 2003].

Note to all :

1.

The number of admissions are restricted to Two students per year.

2.

The recognition so granted to a Postgraduate Course shall be for a maximum period of 5 years, upon which it shall

have to be renewed.

3.

Failure to seek timely renewal of recognition as required in sub-clause (4) shall invariably result in

stoppage of admissions to the concerned Postgraduate Course.

[No. V.-11015/1/2011-ME-P-I]

DHRUV CHAKRAVARTY, Under Secy.

ekuo lalk/u fodkl ea=kky;

(mPprj f'k{kk foHkkx)

(jktHkk"kk ;wfuV)

ubZ fnYyh] 24 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1520-—dsUæh; ljdkj] jktHkk"kk (la?k ds 'kkldh;

iz;kstuksa ds fy, iz;ksx) fu;e] 1976 ds fu;e 10 ds mi fu;e (4)

ds vuqlj.k esa] ekuo lalk/u fodkl ea=kky; (Ldwy f'k{kk ,oa

lk{kjrk foHkkx) ds varxZr dsanzh; fon~;ky; laxBu ds fuEufyf[kr

3 {ks=kh; dk;kZy;ksa rFkk 14 dsanzh; fon~;ky;ksa dks] ,sls dk;kZy;ksa ds

:i esa] ftlds 80 izfr'kr ls vf/d deZpkjh&o`Un us fgUnh dk

dk;Zlk/d Kku izkIr dj fy;k gS] vf/lwfpr djrh gS %

1-

dsanzh; fon~;ky; laxBu] {ks=kh; dk;kZy;] xzkaM ijsM jksM]

vkxjk Nkouh] mRrj izns'k &282001

2-

dsanzh; fon~;ky; laxBu] {ks=kh; dk;kZy;] jkWph] ukedqe

ifjlj] jkWph] >kj[kaM& 834 010

3-

dsanzh; fon~;ky; laxBu] {ks=kh; dk;kZy;] xqokgkVh] fuilhM

jksM] tokgj uxj] xqokgkVh] ftyk&dke:i] eSVªks] vklke&

781 022

4-

dsanzh; fon~;ky;] cjisVk] d`".kuxj] cjisVk Vkmu]

vklke&781 301

5-

dsanzh; fon~;ky;] dfyEiksax] ftyk&nk£tfyax] if'pe

caxky &734 301

6-

dsanzh; fon~;ky;] vyhiqjnokj taD'ku] ftyk&tyikbZxqMh]

if'pe caxky&736 123

7-

dsanzh; fon~;ky;] rqjk] ukftax cktkj] vjk;eSy] ftyk&

osLV xkjks fgYl] es?kky;& 794 001

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3749

8-

dsanzh; fon~;ky;] ok;qlsuk] ckxMksxjk] ftyk&nk£tfyax]

if'pe caxky &734 421

9-

dsanzh; fon~;ky;] ,u- ,p- ih- lh- flaxrke] if'pe

caxky &737 124

10-

dsanzh; fon~;ky; ] vkbZ- vkbZ- Vh-] xqokgkVh] ftyk&dke:i]

vklke& 781 039

11-

dsanzh; fon~;ky;] felk Nkouh] Mkd?kj&felk] ftyk&uxkao]

vklke& 782 138

12-

dsanzh; fon~;ky;] [kkuikjk] tokgjuxj] dke:i] eSVªks]

vklke& 781 022

13-

dsanzh; fon~;ky;] fnjkax] if'pe dkesax] v:.kkpy izns'k]

790 101

14-

dsanzh; fon~;ky;] ch-,l- ,iQ- cSaoqQBiqj] lkyqxkMk]

tyikbZxqMh] if'pe caxky&734 008

15-

dsanzh; fon~;ky;] usgq ifjlj] erykbZ] meflaM] eufdujksg]

f'kykax & 793 022

16-

dsanzh; fon~;ky;] xksyikjk] ts- Vh- ,l- Hkou] csyrksyk]

cynekjh] vklke &783 121

17-

dsanzh; fon~;ky;] jkEch] ,u- ,p- ih- lh- (Vh- ,y- Mh-

ih&2)] jsax] nk£tfyax] if'pe caxky&21

¹la- 11011&1@2013&jk-Hkk-,-º

vuUr dqekj flag] la;qDr lfpo

MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCE

DEVELOPMENT

(Department of Higher Education )

(O. L. Unit)

New Delhi, the 24th July, 2013

S.O. 1520.—ln pursuance of sub. rule (4) of rule 10

of the Official Languages (Use for Official Purposes of the

Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government hereby

notifies the following 3 Regional Offices and 14 Kendriya

Vidyalayas of Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan under the

Ministry of Human Resource Development, (Department

of School Education & Literacy) as offices, whose more

than 80% members of the staff have acquired working

knowledge of Hindi :

1. Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan, Regional Office,

Grand Parade, Agra cantt.,Uttar Pradesh -282 001

2. Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan, Regional Office,

Namkum Campus Ranchi, Jharkhand - 834 010

3. Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan, Regional Office,

Guwahati, NPCCD Road, Jawaharnagar Khanapara,

Guwahati, Distt. Kamrup Assam - 781022

4. Kendriya Vidyalaya, Barpeta Krishannagar, Barpeta

Town, Assam-781301

5. Kendriya Vidyalaya, Kalimpong, Distt. Darjiling,

West Bengal- 734301

6. Kendriya Vidyalaya, Alipurduar JN P.O. Jalpaiguri,

West Bengal-736 123

7. Kendriya Vidyalaya, Tura, Najing Bazar, Araymail,

West Garo Hills- Meghalaya-794001

8. Kendriya Vidyalaya, AFS, Bagdogra, Distt.

Darjiling, West Bengal-734 421

9. Kendriya Vidyalaya, NHPC, Singtam, West Bengal-

737 134

10. Kendriya Vidyalaya, IIT, Guwahati, Distt.-

Kamrup, Assam - 781 039

11. Kendriya Vidyalaya, Misa Cantt. PO Misa, Distt.

Nagaon, Assam - 782 138

12. Kendriya Vidyalaya, Khanapara Jawaharnagar,

Kamrup Metro, Assam - 781022

13. Kendriya Vidyalaya, Dirang, West Kameng,

Arunachal Pradesh - 790 101

14. Kendriya Vidyalaya, BSF, Baikunthpur, Salugara,

Jalpaiguri, West Bengal-734 008

15. Kendriya Vidyalala, Nehu Campus, Matlai,

Usmind, Mankinroh, Shillong-793 022

16. Kendriya Vidyalaya, Goalpara, JTS Building,

Beltola, Baldmari, Assam-783 121

17. Kendriya Vidyalaya, Rambi, NHPC, (TLDP-II),

Reang, Darjiling West Bengal-21

[No. 11011-1/2013-O. L. U.]

ANANT KUMAR SINGH, Jt. Secy.

foKku vkSj izkS|ksfxdh ea=kky;

(foKku vkSj izkS|ksfxdh foHkkx)

ubZ fnYyh] 23 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1521-—dsUæh; ljdkj] jktHkk"kk (la?k ds 'kkldh;

iz;kstuksa ds fy, iz;ksx) fu;e] 1976 ds fu;e 10 ds mi&fu;e

(4) ds vuqlj.k esa] foKku vkSj izkS|ksfxdh foHkkx ds Lok;Ùk 'kklh

laLFkku ^^vk?kkjdj vuqla/ku laLFkk] iq.ks** dks ftuds 80% ls

vf/d deZpkfj;ksa us fgUnh dk dk;Zlk/d Kku izkIr dj fy;k gS]

vf/lwfpr djrh gS A

¹la- bZ&11028@1@2013&jk-Hkk-º

ih- ,u- izlkn] funs'kd (iz'kk- ,oa jk- Hkk-)

3750

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

MINISTRY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

(Department of Science and Technology)

New Delhi, the 23rd July, 2013

S.O. 1521.—In pursuance of Sub-rule (4) of Rule

10 of the Official Language (Use for Official Purposes of

the Union) Rules, 1976 the Central Government hereby

notifies the Autonomous Institute "AGHARKAR

RESEARCH INSTITUTE, PUNE" of Department of Science

and Technology the 80% and more staff whereof have

acquired working knowledge of Hindi.

[No. E.-11028/1/2013 (O.L.)]

P. N. PRASAD, Director (Admn. & O. L.)

lkaf[;dh vkSj dk;ZØe dk;kZUo;u ea=kky;

ubZ fnYyh] 12 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1522-—dsUæh; ljdkj] jktHkk"kk (la?k ds 'kkldh;

iz;kstuksa ds fy, iz;ksx) fu;e] 1976 (;Fkk la'kksf/r 1987) ds

fu;e 10 ds mi&fu;e (4) ds vuqlj.k esa] lkaf[;dh vkSj

dk;ZØe dk;kZUo;u ea=kky; ds v/hu {ks=k ladk;Z izHkkx] jk"Vªh;

izfrn'kZ losZ{k.k dk;kZy; ds {ks=kh; dk;kZy;] eksgkyh dks] ftlds

80 izfr'kr deZpkfj;ksa us fgUnh dk dk;Zlk/d Kku izkIr dj fy;k

gS] Hkkjr ds jkti=k esa vf/lwfpr djrh gS A

¹la- bZ&11011@2@2006&¯gnhº

,l- ,l- c/kou] la;qDr lfpo

MINISTRY OF STATISTICS AND PROGRAMME

IMPLEMENTATION

New Delhi, the 12th July, 2013

S.O. 1522.—In pursuance of Sub-rule (4) of Rule

10 of the Official Language (Use for Official purposes of

the Union) Rules, 1976 (as amended - 1987), the Central

Government hereby notify the Regional Office, Mohali of

Field Operation Division, NSSO under the Ministry of

Statistics and Programme Implementation in the Gazette

of India where 80 percent of the staff has acquired the

working knowledge of Hindi.

[No. E -11011/2/2006 Hindi]

S. S. BADHAWAN, Jt. Secy.

ubZ fnYyh] 12 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1523-—dsUæh; ljdkj] jktHkk"kk (la?k ds 'kkldh;

iz;kstuksa ds fy, iz;ksx) fu;e] 1976 (;Fkk la'kksf/r 1987) ds

fu;e 10 ds mi&fu;e (4) ds vuqlj.k esa] lkaf[;dh vkSj

dk;ZØe dk;kZUo;u ea=kky; ds v/hu {ks=k ladk;Z izHkkx] jk"Vªh;

izfrn'kZ losZ{k.k dk;kZy; ds {ks=kh; dk;kZy;] iksVZ Cys;j dks]

ftlds 80 izfr'kr deZpkfj;ksa us fgUnh dk dk;Zlk/d Kku izkIr

dj fy;k gS] Hkkjr ds jkti=k esa vf/lwfpr djrh gS A

¹la- bZ&11011@2@2006&¯gnhº

,l- ,l- c/kou] la;qDr lfpo

New Delhi, the 12th July, 2013

S. O. 1523.—In pursuance of Sub-rule (4) of Rule

10 of the Official Language (Use for Official purposes of

the Union) Rules, 1976 (as amended - 1987), the Central

Government hereby notify the Regional Office, Port Blair

of Field Operation Division, NSSO under the Ministry of

Statistics and Programme Implementation in the Gazette

of India where 80 percent of the staff has acquired the

working knowledge of Hindi.

[No. E-11011/2/2006-Hindi]

S. S. BADHAWAN, Jt. Secy.

ubZ fnYyh] 12 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1524-—dsUæh; ljdkj] jktHkk"kk (la?k ds 'kkldh;

iz;kstuksa ds fy, iz;ksx) fu;e] 1976 (;Fkk la'kksf/r 1987) ds

fu;e 10 ds mi&fu;e (4) ds vuqlj.k esa] lkaf[;dh vkSj

dk;ZØe dk;kZUo;u ea=kky; ds v/hu {ks=k ladk;Z izHkkx] jk"Vªh;

izfrn'kZ losZ{k.k dk;kZy; ds mi&{ks=kh; dk;kZy;] gehjiqj dks]

ftlds 80 izfr'kr deZpkfj;ksa us fgUnh dk dk;Zlk/d Kku izkIr

dj fy;k gS] Hkkjr ds jkti=k esa vf/lwfpr djrh gS A

¹la- bZ&11011@2@2006&¯gnhº

,l- ,l- c/kou] la;qDr lfpo

New Delhi, the 12th July, 2013

S.O. 1524. —In pursuance of Sub-rule (4) of Rule

10 of the Official Language (Use for Official purposes of

the Union) Rules, 1976 (as amended - 1987), the Central

Government hereby notify the Sub-Regional Office,

Hamirpur of Field Operation Division, NSSO under the

Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation in

the Gazette of India where 80 percent of the staff has

acquired the working knowledge of Hindi.

[No. E-11011/2/2006-Hindi]

S. S. BADHAWAN, Jt. Secy.

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3751

miHkksDrk ekeys] [kk| vkSj lkoZtfud forj.k ea=kky;

(miHkksDrk ekeys foHkkx)

Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks

ubZ fnYyh] 23 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1525-—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks fu;e] 1987 ds fu;e 7 ds mi&fu;e (1) ds [kaM ([k) ds vuqlj.k esa

Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks ,rn~}kjk vf/lwfpr djrk gS fd uhps vuqlwph esa fn, x, ekud esas la'kks/u fd;k x;k gS A

vuqlwph

Øe la- la'kksf/r Hkkjrh; ekud dh

la'kks/u dh la[;k

la'kks/u ykxw gksus dh

la[;k vkSj o"kZ

vkSj frfFk

frfFk

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

1-

vkbZ ,l 4622% 2003 fLFkj&Oghy xsV

la'kks/u la[;k 2]

31 tqykbZ] 2013

ds lajpukRed fMtkbu dh fliQkfj'ksa

tqykbZ] 2013

(rhljk iqujh{k.k)

bl la'kks/u dh izfr;k¡ Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks] ekud Hkou] 9] cgknqj 'kkg t+iQj ekxZ] ubZ fnYyh&110002] {ks=kh;

dk;kZy;ksa % ubZ fnYyh] dksydkrk] p.Mhx<+] psUubZ] eqEcbZ rFkk 'kk[kk dk;kZy;ksa % vgenkckn] caxykSj] Hkksiky] Hkqous'oj] dks;Ecrwj]

xqokgkVh] gSnjkckn] t;iqj] dkuiqj] ukxiqj] iVuk] iw.ks rFkk fr:ouUrkiqje esa fcØh gsrq miyC/ gSa A Hkkjrh; ekudksa dks

http://www.standardsbis.in ij baVjusV }kjk [kjhnk tk ldrk gS A

¹lanHkZ MCY;w vkj Mh 12@Vh&1º

ts- lh- vjksM+k] oSKkfud ^,iQ* ,oa izeq[k (ty lalk/u foHkkx)

MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

(Department of Consumer Affairs)

(BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS)

New Delhi, the 23rd July, 2013

S.O. 1525.—In pursuance of clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987,

the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendment to the Indian Standard, particulars of which is given in the

Schedule hereto annexed have been issued :

SCHEDULE

Sl.No.

No. Title and Year of the

No. and year of the

Date from which

Indian Standards

amendment

the amendment

shall have effect

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

1.

IS 4622 : 2003

Amendment No. 2

31st July, 2013

Recommendations for Structural

July 2013

Design of Fixed-Wheel Gates

(Third Revision)

3752

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Copies of this Standards are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan, 9, Bahadur

Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi- 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi, Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chennai, Mumbai and

also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati, Hyderabad, Jaipur,

Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna, Pune, Thiruvananthapuram. On line purchase of Indian standard can be purchased from BIS Sales

Portal http://www.standardsbis.in

[Ref. WRD 12 /T-1]

J. C. ARORA, Scientist ‘F’ & Head (Water Resources Deptt.)

ubZ fnYyh] 25 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1526-—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks fu;e] 1987 ds fu;e 7 ds mifu;e (1) ds [kaM ([k) ds vuqlj.k esa Hkkjrh; ekud

C;wjks ,rn~}kjk vf/lwfpr djrk gS fd ftu Hkkjrh; ekudksa ds fooj.k uhps vuqlwph esa fn, x, gSa os LFkkfir gks x, gSa %—

vuqlwph

Øe

LFkkfir Hkkjrh; ekud(dksa) dh la[;k] o"kZ

u;s Hkkjrh; ekud }kjk

LFkkfir frfFk

la[;k

vkSj 'kh"kZd

vfrØfer Hkkjrh;

ekud vFkok ekudksa]

;fn dksbZ gks] dh la[;k

vkSj o"kZ

1-

IS 15858 % 2013

—

30 twu] 2013

dkWVu lhM Mhfy¯UVx e'khujh—fon~;qr rkiu

vkSj nzo pkfyr in~ofr lfgr Mhfy¯UVx

e'khu&fof'kf"V

2-

IS 15859% 2013

—

30 twu] 2013

dkWVu lhM Mhfy¯UVx e'khujh—,vj tsV ,oa

ukW;ykWu cz'k e'khu lfgr c¯iQx e'khu&

fof'kf"V

3-

IS 15860% 2013

—

30 twu] 2013

dkWVu lhM Mhfy¯UVx e'khujh—veksfu;k

ok"id lfgr veksfu;k dkWVu lhM

U;wVªkykbtj e'khu&fof'kf"V

4-

IS 15861% 2013

—

30 twu] 2013

dkWVu lhM Mhfy¯UVx e'khujh—LØcj]

lkbDyksu] fpeuh] gqM ,oa laokrd lfgr

iznw"kd fu;a=kd iz.kkyh&fof'kf"V

5-

IS 15862% 2013

—

30 twu] 2013

dkWVu lhM Mhfy¯UVx e'khujh—,plh,y xSl

mRiknd bdkbZ—fof'kf"V

bu ekudksa dh izfr;k¡ Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks] ekud Hkou] 9] cgknqj 'kkg tiQj ekxZ] ubZ fnYyh&110002] {ks=kh; dk;kZy;ksa % ubZ

fnYyh] dksydkrk] pSUubZ] eqEcbZ p.Mhx<+ rFkk 'kk[kk dk;kZy;ksa % vgenkckn] caxykSj] Hkksiky] Hkqous'oj] dks;Ecrwj] xqokgkVh] gSnjkckn]

t;iqj] dkuiqj] ukxiqj] iVuk] iw.ks rFkk dksfp esa fcØh gsrq miyC/ gSa A

¹lanHkZ ,iQ,Mh@th&128º

dqekj vfuy] oSKkfud ^,iQ* ,oa izeq[k ([kk| ,oa Ñf"k)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3753

New Delhi, the 25th July, 2013

S.O.

1526.—In pursuance of Clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987,

the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards, particulars of which are given in the Schedule

hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each :

SCHEDULE

Sl.

No. & Year of the Indian

No. & Year of Indian

Date of

No.

Standards

Standards, if any,

Establishment

Superseded by the

New Indian Standard

1.

IS 15858: 2013

—

30 June, 2013

Cotton seed delinting machinery—

Delinting machine with electrical

heating and hydraulic system—

Specification

2.

IS 15859: 2013

—

30 June, 2013

Cotton seed delinting machinery—

Buffing machine with air jet and

nylon brush—Specification

3.

IS 15860 : 2013

—

30 June, 2013

Cotton seed delinting machinery—

Ammonia cotton Seed neutralizer machine

with ammonia vaporizer—Specification

4.

IS 15861: 2013

—

30 June, 2013

Cotton seed delinting machinery—

Pollution control system with

scrubber, cyclone, chimney, hoods

and ducting—Specification

5.

IS 15862: 2013

—

30 June, 2013

Cotton seed delinting machinery—

HCI gas generation unit-

Specification

Copy of these standards are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur

Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi-110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi, Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chennai, Mumbai and also

Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal, Bhubhneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati, Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur,

Nagpur, Patna, Pune and Kochi.

[Ref. FAD/G-128]

KUMAR ANIL, Scientist ‘F’ and Head (Food & Agri.)

ubZ fnYyh] 29 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk-

1527-—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks fu;e] 1987 ds fu;e 7 ds mifu;e (1) ds [kaM ([k) ds vuqlj.k esa Hkkjrh; ekud

C;wjks ,rn~}kjk vf/lwfpr djrk gS fd uhps vuqlwph esa fn, x, ekud(dksa) esa la'kks/u fd;k x;k@fd;s x;s gSa A

vuqlwph

Øe

la'kksf/r Hkkjrh; ekud(dksa) dh la[;k]

la'kks/u dh la[;k vkSj frfFk

LFkkfir frfFk

la[;k

o"kZ vkSj 'kh"kZd

1-

vkbZ,l 877% 1989 lfØf;r dkcZu pw£.kr

la'kks/u la[;k ua- 2

31 tqykbZ] 2013

vkSj nkusnkj ds uewus ysus vkSj ijh{k.k dh

tqykbZ 2013

i¼fr;ksa dh fof'kf"V dk elkSnk (nwljk

iqujh{k.k)

3754

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

bu Hkkjrh; ekudksa dh izfr;k¡ Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks] ekud Hkou] 9] cgknqj'kkg tiQj ekxZ] ubZ fnYyh&110 002] {ks=kh;

dk;kZy;ksa % ubZ fnYyh] dksydkrk] p.Mhx<+] pSUubZ] eqEcbZ rFkk 'kk[kk dk;kZy;ksa % vgenkckn] caxykSj] Hkksiky] Hkqous'oj] dks;Ecrwj]

xqokgkVh] gSnjkckn] t;iqj] dkuiqj] ukxiqj] iVuk] iw.ks rFkk fr:ouUrkiqje esa fcØh gsrq miyC/ gSa A Hkkjrh; ekudksa dks http://

www.standardsbis.in }kjk baVjuSV ij [kjhnk tk ldrk gS A

¹lanHkZ lh,pMh 1@vkbZ,l 877º

MkW- jktho ds- >k] oSKkfud ^,iQ* ,oa izeq[k (jlk;u)

New Delhi, the 29th July, 2013

S.O.

1527.—In pursuance of clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987

the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards, particulars of which are given

in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued :

SCHEDULE

Sl.

No. & Year of the Indian

No. and year of

Date from which the

No.

Standards

the amendment

amendment shall have

effect

1.

IS 877:1989 Activated carbons,

Amendment No. 2

31 July, 2013

powdered and granular—

July 2013

Methods of sampling and test

(second revision)

Copy of this standards is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan, 9, Bahadur Shah

Zafar Marg, New Delhi-110 002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi, Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chennai, Mumbai and also Branch

Offices : Ahmadabad, Bangalore, Bhopal, Bhubneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati, Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur,

Patna, Pune, Thiruvananthapuram. On line purchase of Indian standard can be made at :http://www.standardsbis.in.

[Ref CHD/1/IS 877]

Dr. RAJIV K. JHA, Scientist ‘F’ & Head (CHD)

ubZ fnYyh] 29 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk-

1528-—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks fu;e] 1987 ds fu;e 7 ds mi&fu;e (1) ds [kaM ([k) ds vuqlj.k esa Hkkjrh; ekud

C;wjks ,rn~}kjk vf/lwfpr djrk gS fd uhps vuqlwph esa fn, x, ekud(dksa) esa la'kks/u fd;k x;k@fd;s x;s gSa A

vuqlwph

Øe

la'kksf/r Hkkjrh; ekud (dksa) dh la[;k]

la'kks/u dh la[;k vkSj frfFk

LFkkfir frfFk

la[;k

o"kZ vkSj 'kh"kZd

1-

vkbZ,l 15489 % 2004 isUV] IykfLVd

la'kks/u la[;k ua- 1

31 tqykbZ] 2013

beY'ku&fof'kf"V

tqykbZ 2013

bu Hkkjrh; ekud dh izfr;k¡ Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks] ekud Hkou] 9] cgknqj 'kkg tiQj ekxZ] ubZ fnYyh&110 002] {ks=kh;

dk;kZy;ksa % ubZ fnYyh] dksydkrk] p.Mhx<+] psUubZ] eqEcbZ rFkk 'kk[kk dk;kZy;ksa % vgenkckn] caxykSj] Hkksiky] Hkqous'oj] dks;Ecrwj]

xqokgkVh] gSnjkckn] t;iqj] dkuiqj] iVuk] iw.ks rFkk fr:ouUrkiqje esa fcØh gsrq miyC/ gSa A Hkkjrh; ekudksa dks http://www.standardsbis.in

}kjk baVjuSV ij [kjhnk tk ldrk gS A

¹lanHkZ lh,pMh 20@vkbZ,l 15489º

Mk- jktho ds- >k] oSKkfud ^,iQ* ,oa izeq[k (jlk;u)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3755

New Delhi, the 29th July, 2013

S.O.

1528.—In pursuance of clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987

the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards, particulars of which are given

in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued :

SCHEDULE

Sl.

No. and Year of the Indian

No. and year of

Date from which the

No.

Standards

the amendment

amendment shall have

effect

1.

IS 15489 : 2004 Paint, Plastic

Amendment No. 1

31 July, 2013

Emulsion—Specification

July 2013

Copy of this Standards is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan, 9, Bahadur Shah

Zafar Marg, New Delhi-110 002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi, Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chennai, Mumbai and also Branch

Offices : Ahmadabad, Bangalore, Bhopal, Bhubhneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati, Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur,

Patna, Pune, Thiruvananthapuram. On line purchase of Indian standard can be made at : http://www.standardsbis.in.

[Ref : CHD 20/IS 15489]

Dr. RAJIV K. JHA, Scientist ‘F’ & Head (CHD)

ubZ fnYyh] 30 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1529-—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks fu;e] 1987 ds fu;e 7 ds mi&fu;e (1) ds [kaM ([k) ds vuqlj.k esa Hkkjrh; ekud

C;wjks ,rn~}kjk vf/lwfpr djrk gS fd ftu ekudksa dk fooj.k uhps vuqlwph esa fn;k x;k gaS os LFkkfir gks x;s gSa %

vuqlwph

Øe la- LFkkfir Hkkjrh; ekudksa (dh)

u;s Hkkjrh; ekud }kjk

LFkkfir frfFk

la[;k] o"kZ vkSj 'kh"kZd

vfrØfer Hkkjrh; ekud

vFkok ekudksa] ;fn dksbZ gks]

dh la[;k vkSj o"kZ

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

1-

vkbZ ,l 8112 % 2013 lk/kj.k iksVZySaM lhesaV]

vkbZ ,l 8112 % 1989

31]tqykbZ 2013

43 xzsM& fof'kf"V (nwljk iqujh{k.k)

bl Hkkjrh; ekud dh izfr Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks] ekud Hkou] 9] cgknqj 'kkg t+iQj ekxZ] ubZ fnYyh&110002] {ks=kh;

dk;kZy;ksa % ubZ fnYyh] dksydkrk] p.Mhx<+] psUubZ] eqEcbZ rFkk 'kk[kk dk;kZy;ksa % vgenkckn] caxykSj] Hkksiky] Hkqous'oj] dks;Ecrwj]

xqokgkVh] gSnjkckn] t;iqj] dkuiqj] ukxiqj] iVuk] iw.ks rFkk dksfp esa fcØh gsrq miyC/ gSa A

¹lanHkZ lhbZMh@jkti=kº

lh- vkj- jktsUæk] oSKkfud ^,iQ* ,oa izeq[k (flfoy bathfu;jh)

New Delhi, the 30th July, 2013

S.O. 1529.—In pursuance of clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules,

1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards, particulars of which are given in the

Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each :

SCHEDULE

Sl. No.

No. and Year of the Indian

No. and Year of the

Date of Establishment

Standards Established

Indian Standards, if

any, Superseded by the

New Indian Standard

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

1.

IS 8112 : 2013 Ordinary Portland Cement

IS 8112 : 1989

31 July 2013

43 Grade-Specification (Second Revision)

3756

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Copy of these Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan, 9, Bahadur

Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi- 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi, Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chennai, Mumbai and also

Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati, Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur,

Nagpur, Patna, Pune, Kochi.

[Ref. CED/Gazette)]

C. R. RAJENDRA, Scientist ‘F’ & Head (Civil Engg.)

ubZ fnYyh] 30 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1530-—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks fu;e] 1987 ds fu;e 7 ds mi&fu;e (1) ds [kaM ([k) ds vuqlj.k esa

Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks ,rn~}kjk vf/lwfpr djrk gS fd uhps vuqlwph esa fn;s x;s ekud (dkas) esas la'kks/u fd;k x;k@fd;s x;s gSa A

vuqlwph

Øe la- la'kksf/r Hkkjrh; ekud (dksa) dh

la'kks/u dh la[;k

LFkkfir frfFk

la[;k o"kZ vkSj 'kh"kZd

vkSj frfFk

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

1-

vkbZ ,l 101 (Hkkx 6@vuqHkkx1) %1988

la'kks/u la[;k ua- 3]

31 tqykbZ] 2013

jax jksxuksa] ok£u'kksa vkSj lacaf/r mRiknksa ds

tqykbZ] 2013

uewus ysus vkSj ijh{k.k dh i¼fr;ksa Hkkx 6

LFkkf;Ro ijh{k.k vuqHkkx 1 laèkuu dh

ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa vkærk dh izfrjksf/rk

(rhljk iqujh{k.k)

bu Hkkjrh; ekudksa dh izfr;k¡ Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks] ekud Hkou] 9] cgknqj 'kkg t+iQj ekxZ] ubZ fnYyh&110002] {ks=kh;

dk;kZy;ksa % ubZ fnYyh] dksydkrk] p.Mhx<+] psUubZ] eqEcbZ rFkk 'kk[kk dk;kZy;ksa % vgenkckn] caxykSj] Hkksiky] Hkqous'oj] dks;Ecrwj]

xqokgkVh] gSnjkckn] t;iqj] dkuiqj] ukxiqj] iVuk] iw.ks rFkk fr:ouUrkiqje esa fcØh gsrq miyC/ gSa A Hkkjrh; ekudksa dks

:http://www.standardsbis.in }kjk baVjuSV ij [kjhnk tk ldrk gS A

¹lanHkZ lh,pMh 20@vkbZ,l 101 (Hkkx 6@vuqHkkx 1)º

MkW- jktho ds- >k] oSKkfud ^,iQ* ,oa izeq[k (jlk;u)

New Delhi, the 30th July, 2013

S.O. 1530.—In pursuance of clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987,

the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards, particulars of which are given

in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued :

SCHEDULE

Sl.No.

No. and year of the

No. and year of the

Date from which

Indian Standards

amendment

the amendment

shall have effect

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

1.

IS 101(Part 6/Sec 1) : 1988

Amendment No. 3

31 July, 2013

Methods of sampling and test for July, 2013

paints, varnishes and related

products Part 6 Durability Tests

Section 1 Resistance to humidity

under conditions of condensation

(Third Revision)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3757

Copy of this Standards is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan, 9, Bahadur

Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi- 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi, Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chennai, Mumbai and

also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati, Hyderabad, Jaipur,

Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna, Pune, Thiruvananthapuram. On line purchase of Indian standard can be made

at :http://www.standardsbis.in

[Ref. CHD 20 /IS 101 (Part 6/Sec 1)]

Dr. RAJIV K. JHA, Scientist ‘F’ & Head (CHD)

ubZ fnYyh] 30 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1531-—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks fu;e] 1987 ds fu;e 7 ds mi&fu;e (1) ds [kaM ([k) ds vuqlj.k esa

Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks ,rn~}kjk vf/lwfpr djrk gS fd uhps vuqlwph esa fn;s x;s ekud (dkas) esas la'kks/u fd;k x;k@fd;s x;s gSa %

vuqlwph

Øe la- la'kksf/r Hkkjrh; ekud (dksa) dh

la'kks/u dh la[;k

LFkkfir frfFk

la[;k] o"kZ vkSj 'kh"kZd

vkSj frfFk

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

1-

vkbZ ,l 1288 % 1982 [kfut ftIle ds

la'kks/u la[;k ua- 1]

31 tqykbZ] 2013

fy, ijh{k.k dh i¼fr;k¡

tqykbZ] 2013

(nwljk iqujh{k.k)

bu Hkkjrh; ekudksa dh izfr;k¡ Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks] ekud Hkou] 9] cgknqj 'kkg t+iQj ekxZ] ubZ fnYyh&110002] {ks=kh;

dk;kZy;ksa % ubZ fnYyh] dksydkrk] p.Mhx<+] psUubZ] eqEcbZ rFkk 'kk[kk dk;kZy;ksa % vgenkckn] caxykSj] Hkksiky] Hkqous'oj] dks;Ecrwj]

xqokgkVh] gSnjkckn] t;iqj] dkuiqj] ukxiqj] iVuk] iw.ks rFkk fr:ouUrkiqje esa fcØh gsrq miyC/ gSa A Hkkjrh; ekudksa dks

:http://www.standardsbis.in }kjk baVjuSV ij [kjhnk tk ldrk gS A

¹lanHkZ lh,pMh 1@vkbZ,l 1288º

MkW- jktho ds- >k] oSKkfud ^,iQ* ,oa izeq[k (jlk;u)

New Delhi, the 30th July, 2013

S.O. 1531.—In pursuance of clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of Rules 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987,

the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards, particulars of which are given

in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued :

SCHEDULE

Sl. No.

No. and year of the

No. and year of the

Date from which

Indian Standards

amendment

the amendment

shall have effect

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

1.

IS 1288 : 1982 Methods of

Amendment No. 1

31th July, 2013

test for mineral gypsum

July, 2013

(second Revision)

Copy of this Standards is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan, 9, Bahadur

Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi- 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi, Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chennai, Mumbai and

also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati, Hyderabad, Jaipur,

Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna, Pune, Thiruvananthapuram. On line purchase of Indian standard can be made at

:http://www.standardsbis.in

[Ref. CHD 1 /IS 1288]

Dr. RAJIV K. JHA, Scientist ‘F’ & Head (CHD)

isVªksfy;e vkSj izkÑfrd xSl ea=kky;

ubZ fnYyh] 27 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk-

1532-—dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slk izrhr gksrk gS fd yksd fgr esa ;g vko';d gS fd iVuk ls eksfrgkjh vkSj csrkyiqj

rd isVªksfy;e inkFkks± ds ifjogu gsrq ftyk lkju] jkT; fcgkj esa bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkuh pkfg, A

vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slh ikbiykbu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, vko';d izrhr gksrk gS fd ml Hkwfe esa ftlds Hkhrj mDr

ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkus dk izLrko gS vkSj tks bl vf/lwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa o£.kr gS] mi;ksx dk vtZu fd;k tk, A

vr% vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbUl (Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/dkj dk vtZu) vf/fu;e] 1962 (1962

dk 50) dh /kjk 3 dh mi/kjk (1) }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] mDr Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/dkj dk vtZu djus ds vius

vk'k; dh ?kks"k.kk djrh gSA

dksbZ O;fDr] tks mDr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa fgrc¼ gS] ml rkjh[k ls ftldks] Hkkjr ds jkti=k esa ;Fkk izdkf'kr bl

vfèklwpuk dh izfr;ka lk/kj.k turk dks miyC/ djk nh tkrh gS] bDdhl fnu ds vUnj] Hkwfe ds Hkhrj ikbiykbu fcNk, tkus gsrq mi;ksx

ds vf/dkj ds vtZu ds fy,] Jh v:.k dqekj >k] fc-iz-ls- o l{ke izkf/dkjh bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM] (ikbiykbUl fMohtu)

iVuk] iks-vks- <syok] flikjk] ftyk iVuk] fiu% 800020] fcgkj dks fyf[kr :i eas vk{ksi Hkst ldsxkA

vuqlwph

ftyk % lkju

jkT; % fcgkj

ekStk@xzke

losZ@Cykd@la- (IyksV la-)

lc&Mho&la-

{ks=kiQy

gsDVs;j

vkjs

oxZ ehVj

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

jk;iqj csuxoku

313(unh)

00

32

16

Fkkuk uacj % 523

121(unh)

07

44

35

65

00

28

79

78

00

46

49

111@330

00

29

97

[kokliwj [kqnZ

248 (dPpk jkLrk)

00

01

64

Fkkuk uacj % 510

53

00

01

78

52

00

10

20

51

00

00

38

50

00

00

20

54

00

00

20

60

00

03

72

61

00

01

86

62

00

02

16

65

00

01

10

66

00

02

65

67

00

00

20

68

00

01

87

71

00

01

09

72

00

02

21

73

00

02

53

74

00

03

16

75

00

00

47

3758

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3759

42

00

01

04

76

00

00

78

77

00

00

43

41(dPpk jkLrk)

00

00

14

40

00

05

75

39

00

00

20

13

00

03

42

14

00

01

12

15

00

02

75

16

00

00

96

19

00

00

20

20

00

00

20

12

00

07

09

11

00

04

08

10

00

00

20

7

00

00

37

8

00

06

16

6

00

04

63

5

00

01

19

1

00

00

66

[kokliwj

177

00

05

03

Fkkuk uacj % 513

bLekbyiqj

183

00

01

10

Fkkuk uacj % 509

181

00

07

51

182

00

05

78

180

00

00

88

118

00

07

64

119

00

00

98

120

00

00

24

117

00

00

53

115

00

01

18

114

00

10

32

121

00

04

70

122

00

00

24

123

00

00

24

113

00

00

42

96(jkLrk)

00

03

23

50

00

00

20

49

00

07

50

48

00

03

35

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3760

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

47

00

00

24

43

00

04

03

44

00

00

24

42

00

03

08

39

00

00

37

40

00

00

20

38

00

03

83

37

00

00

58

36

00

00

24

36@219

00

00

78

38@216 (dPpk jkLrk)

00

01

13

txnh'kiqj

993

00

01

68

Fkkuk uacj % 508

939

00

01

79

940

00

00

20

941

00

00

20

832

00

00

20

938

00

04

81

937

00

02

99

936

00

03

43

835

00

05

20

836

00

07

96

837

00

00

20

845

00

04

72

846

00

00

20

844

00

00

20

851

00

01

33

850

00

02

95

849

00

00

48

858

00

02

54

859

00

00

20

857

00

01

21

864

00

02

14

865

00

01

36

863

00

00

52

872

00

01

54

871

00

01

94

870

00

01

91

693

00

01

34

874

00

01

90

875

00

01

50

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3761

876

00

00

20

691

00

01

97

692

00

01

38

639

00

00

20

878

00

02

00

634

00

04

86

633

00

00

20

635

00

03

49

636

00

00

20

307(jkLrk)

00

01

36

311

00

00

20

312

00

16

96

313

00

02

78

314

00

00

20

267

00

00

36

268

00

00

20

266

00

03

16

265

00

05

89

264

00

05

74

263

00

09

54

253

00

00

77

262

00

02

20

254

00

04

42

255

00

08

80

256

00

00

20

244

00

01

44

245

00

03

85

238

00

00

20

243

00

12

01

240

00

00

20

241

00

03

50

242

00

09

70

pd tekyh

31

00

03

04

Fkkuk uacj % 507

54

00

00

66

32

00

05

69

30

00

00

34

29

00

00

20

33

00

16

46

35

00

00

20

37

00

02

46

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3762

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

38

00

02

48

39

00

02

12

40

00

00

20

41

00

05

58

42

00

01

78

7(jkLrk)

00

02

62

14

00

00

32

15

00

00

20

13

00

08

52

12

00

00

20

9

00

01

51

11

00

00

92

10

00

05

60

4

00

10

15

dkthiwj

584

00

06

26

Fkkuk uacj % 514

585

00

05

41

586

00

17

16

720

00

00

20

583

00

00

31

587

00

04

75

580

00

00

20

579

00

02

17

578

00

00

20

597

00

00

20

598

00

14

51

577

00

00

68

576

00

00

20

599

00

04

91

600

00

05

66

601

00

09

22

602

00

03

71

605

00

00

20

607

00

00

20

567

00

00

65

606

00

11

63

565

00

06

23

562

00

04

82

561

00

00

20

529

00

02

48

528

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3763

530

00

07

50

531

00

02

57

532

00

00

20

535

00

00

20

533

00

06

64

534

00

06

44

520

00

00

40

519

00

06

97

518

00

02

87

468 (jsYkos)

00

05

87

453(jsYkos)

00

04

74

463

00

03

11

464 (jkLrk)

00

01

40

422

00

05

30

426

00

00

61

425

00

02

57

423

00

10

20

424

00

00

90

421

00

01

85

419

00

00

37

420

00

05

28

418

00

00

20

415

00

00

20

417

00

04

08

416

00

04

02

62

00

00

85

61

00

01

79

59

00

04

86

58

00

02

29

54

00

02

64

53

00

03

60

52

00

12

12

51

00

04

91

48

00

00

20

47

00

08

78

45

00

00

52

44

00

00

20

46

00

03

53

43

00

03

30

42

00

05

47

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3764

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

4

00

00

20

gluiqjk n[khyh[ky

103 (ukyk)

00

01

96

Fkkuk uacj % 517

64

00

06

66

63

00

03

65

62

00

07

55

61

00

03

52

56(ukyk)

00

02

77

1(ukyk)

00

03

07

gluiqjk

77

00

04

48

Fkkuk uacj % 516

75

00

06

71

74

00

18

55

73

00

00

46

98

00

05

72

69

00

15

13

67

00

12

17

52 (fiQYM psuy)

00

01

22

33

00

11

12

32(fiQYM psuy)

00

01

24

31

00

07

01

26

00

00

83

30

00

01

69

29

00

00

20

27

00

02

82

28

00

04

64

19

00

08

88

6

00

00

20

20

00

06

29

5

00

05

15

4

00

04

72

1

00

04

51

2

00

00

20

tykyiwj

7

00

01

97

Fkkuk uacj % 515

6

00

03

06

5

00

01

14

4

00

01

45

3

00

03

06

2

00

03

71

1

00

00

50

ehtkZiwj

39

00

01

06

Fkkuk uacj % 497

38(fiQYM psuy)

00

02

39

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3765

244

00

00

52

32

00

12

50

31

00

06

44

30

00

05

30

29

00

00

20

28

00

05

50

26 (jkLrk)

00

05

27

12

00

02

38

13

00

08

88

14

00

00

20

21

00

02

93

20

00

13

09

1(dsuky)

00

02

81

/jeiqjk

516

00

03

00

Fkkuk uacj % 305

442

00

04

18

443

00

00

20

450

00

00

20

453

00

15

44

454

00

00

73

457

00

00

20

452

00

17

08

458

00

05

06

459

00

00

20

439

00

07

82

438(dsuky)

00

01

72

289(dsuky)

00

04

66

243

00

00

77

242

00

00

20

288

00

01

99

287

00

03

06

286

00

02

83

285

00

03

48

284

00

03

08

283

00

02

44

282

00

03

19

281

00

02

56

280

00

01

61

279

00

12

77

278

00

00

64

277

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3766

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

thydkckn

1436

00

01

39

Fkkuk uacj % 495

1435

00

10

04

1432

00

03

87

1432@1535

00

01

16

1431

00

04

16

1431@1534

00

01

26

1428

00

19

49

1427

00

05

71

1426

00

02

50

1423

00

05

42

1422

00

01

74

1421

00

01

28

1418

00

02

23

1419

00

00

32

1414

00

00

20

1417

00

06

58

1415

00

04

07

1416

00

00

20

1393

00

09

35

1400

00

03

91

1401

00

00

20

1399

00

00

20

1383

00

04

05

1382

00

00

93

1403

00

05

28

1382@1537

00

09

95

1404

00

04

89

1380

00

00

20

1370

00

00

20

1371(fiQYM psuy)

00

00

52

1372

00

00

54

1331

00

19

46

1332

00

02

98

1332@1538

00

02

84

1333

00

02

18

1333@1539

00

01

60

1342

00

01

15

1329 (fiQYM psuy)

00

01

84

1328

00

00

20

1327@1536

00

00

70

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3767

1327

00

06

89

1321

00

04

60

1320

00

02

65

1322

00

01

54

1326

00

00

20

1322

00

05

10

1319

00

01

14

1316(fiQYM psuy)

00

01

89

ihjkjh

1371(fiQYM psuy)

00

01

68

Fkkuk uacj % 306

1427

00

27

00

1426

00

06

13

1428

00

29

29

1424

00

00

20

1429

00

00

20

1398

00

36

43

769

00

02

14

761

00

02

15

762

00

01

54

763

00

01

98

767

00

01

70

768

00

00

20

1430 (dPpk jkLrk)

00

01

27

njh;ko xat Fkkuk uacj % 303

2(ukyk)

00

00

20

egkjkt xat

44(fiQYM psuy)

00

01

80

Fkkuk uacj % 308

43

00

02

97

42

00

04

33

41

00

04

25

40

00

02

64

39

00

02

03

38

00

02

67

37

00

03

98

35

00

03

86

34

00

04

21

32

00

05

01

31

00

00

86

30

00

10

13

23

00

02

07

29

00

00

20

22

00

03

48

21

00

06

26

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3768

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

20

00

03

00

18

00

02

41

14

00

02

49

13

00

03

61

12

00

03

52

11

00

11

17

10

00

01

79

4

00

04

63

2

00

01

21

1(jkLrk)

00

02

57

chlwuiqjk

2350(jkLrk)

00

03

04

Fkkuk uacj % 314

2348

00

05

60

2346

00

00

20

2347

00

06

35

2340

00

03

54

2339

00

03

14

2338

00

03

65

2311

00

03

02

2315

00

03

44

2318

00

02

80

2294

00

02

98

2293

00

03

32

2290

00

06

41

2291

00

00

20

2286

00

05

17

2285

00

03

17

2228(fiQYM psuy)

00

02

96

2227

00

16

26

2229

00

04

31

2230

00

02

09

2226

00

01

63

2231

00

04

19

2225

00

10

44

2224

00

00

85

2223(fiQYM psuy)

00

01

43

2134

00

06

13

2129

00

08

70

2026

00

05

41

2027

00

02

21

2028

00

03

10

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3769

2025

00

00

20

2031

00

04

52

2032

00

00

20

2039

00

04

80

2040

00

03

92

2042

00

04

74

2048

00

03

68

2022(fiQYM psuy)

00

01

43

1911

00

04

33

1912

00

04

10

1913

00

03

05

1914

00

02

22

1915

00

04

50

1918

00

02

66

1919

00

00

48

1939

00

00

20

1990(fiQYM psuy)

00

01

04

1950

00

02

52

1995

00

03

37

1994

00

00

20

1987

00

11

30

1988

00

00

20

1986

00

06

68

1985

00

06

61

1983

00

00

20

1958(fiQYM psuy)

00

00

83

1952

00

03

70

1951

00

00

91

1953

00

07

22

1954

00

00

20

1956

00

05

72

1955

00

05

27

1860(jkLrk)

00

01

08

1856(jkLrk)

00

01

03

1811

00

07

26

1810

00

05

10

1808

00

00

20

1809

00

04

91

1804

00

04

30

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3770

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1805

00

00

60

1802

00

03

02

1800

00

00

20

1799

00

02

96

1730 (fiQYM psuy)

00

03

44

1727

00

03

76

1726

00

04

40

1725

00

02

72

1719

00

00

20

1720

00

06

46

1717

00

05

72

1712

00

02

87

1711

00

03

19

1710

00

00

20

1707

00

03

35

1706

00

02

03

1705

00

02

16

1700

00

00

71

1702

00

02

70

1684

00

00

20

1683

00

00

20

1701

00

01

40

1685

00

03

54

1686

00

02

53

1688

00

01

64

1689

00

00

20

1687

00

02

90

1691

00

01

63

1692

00

03

32

1693

00

00

34

1493

00

02

16

1694

00

00

20

1281

00

05

64

1284

00

06

10

1280

00

00

20

1277

00

00

74

1278

00

05

57

1276

00

06

16

1275

00

05

02

1274

00

02

08

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3771

1272

00

00

95

1271

00

00

20

1270

00

00

20

1237

00

00

20

1238

00

00

20

1273

00

02

50

1236

00

04

08

1239

00

01

00

1240

00

04

30

1241

00

04

42

1200

00

00

20

1242

00

02

84

1199

00

00

72

1198

00

04

63

1169 (fiQYM psuy)

00

01

86

1120

00

09

14

1121

00

00

20

1118

00

00

20

1123

00

00

20

1119

00

02

96

1122

00

06

05

1125

00

03

25

1131

00

00

20

1130

00

00

20

1126

00

02

63

1127

00

05

56

1128

00

06

78

1129

00

00

84

1054 (jkLrk)

00

01

84

706 (jkLrk)

00

01

30

1008

00

00

29

1009

00

08

96

1010

00

00

20

1011

00

09

49

1012

00

03

29

1013

00

02

89

1014

00

01

72

1015

00

01

55

1018

00

02

64

1019

00

08

87

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3772

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

935(dsuky)

00

01

07

833

00

14

29

834

00

00

80

837

00

09

43

836

00

00

20

838 (fiQYM psuy)

00

01

06

845

00

00

20

846

00

18

40

848

00

00

20

847

00

02

09

886 (fiQYM psuy)

00

01

68

112

00

10

06

113

00

07

12

111

00

01

30

114

00

02

76

115

00

00

23

116

00

14

96

109

00

00

20

117

00

04

02

108

00

08

69

90

00

03

78

91

00

00

20

89

00

03

24

73

00

03

07

80

00

00

24

79

00

02

20

74

00

00

74

77

00

00

20

76

00

00

20

78

00

05

98

eksckjdiqj

884

00

09

41

Fkkuk uacj % 317

886

00

00

20

887

00

00

20

880

00

03

16

883

00

16

88

876

00

09

29

875 (jkLrk)

00

01

82

874 (jkLrk)

00

01

12

873

00

06

55

835

00

05

24

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3773

836

00

05

03

838

00

06

38

837

00

00

20

839

00

02

22

840

00

07

68

841

00

01

27

843

00

00

29

842

00

13

69

818 (fiQYM psuy)

00

01

38

737

00

17

15

733

00

17

22

732 (fiQYM psuy)

00

01

44

730

00

05

15

714

00

07

39

715

00

07

31

713

00

08

57

716

00

00

20

709

00

02

66

708

00

00

89

710

00

03

16

711

00

01

52

712

00

00

20

695

00

10

03

694

00

05

53

682

00

09

85

681

00

06

13

680

00

00

20

683

00

00

68

678

00

00

20

679

00

08

15

697 (jkLrk)

00

01

79

ekyk 'ksjiqj

664 (jkLrk)

00

01

44

Fkkuk uacj % 315

90

00

05

96

89 (fiQYM psuy)

00

02

71

91

00

00

55

88

00

02

24

77

00

10

13

74

00

00

20

78

00

09

08

79

00

01

19

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3774

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

80

00

00

20

72

00

11

72

71 (fiQYM psuy)

00

01

60

70

00

02

68

69

00

00

54

68

00

00

92

67

00

01

90

64

00

06

66

63

00

03

79

59

00

02

27

50

00

02

89

58

00

00

90

52

00

16

40

53

00

00

20

51

00

03

30

153 (fiQYM psuy)

00

01

37

ekyk ehtkZ rqdjk

151 (fiQYM psuy)

00

01

20

Fkkuk uacj % 291

15

00

14

76

13

00

21

82

12 (jkLrk)

00

00

92

11 (jkLrk)

00

00

84

10 (jkLrk)

00

01

00

6

00

02

80

5

00

03

80

7

00

07

88

4

00

06

61

3

00

08

03

egenk

4288

00

05

31

Fkkuk uacj % 334

4287

00

00

31

4289

00

00

71

4286

00

11

42

4285

00

03

08

4296 (ukyk)

00

01

01

4772

00

06

87

4283

00

22

97

4282 (jkLrk)

00

01

96

4281 (jkLrk)

00

04

59

4280 (dsuky)

00

00

91

4279

00

24

86

4209 (jkLrk)

00

02

94

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3775

4207

00

00

38

4206

00

00

20

4201

00

10

10

4202

00

03

04

4198

00

04

64

4203

00

07

36

4204

00

01

08

esgh;u

286

00

01

47

Fkkuk uacj % 290

285

00

06

77

288

00

00

20

284

00

00

30

289

00

06

97

342

00

00

37

297

00

08

59

296

00

00

20

340

00

00

42

339

00

00

77

338

00

01

56

298

00

10

30

323

00

06

88

1360

00

00

20

299

00

00

49

300

00

00

33

322

00

08

29

301

00

00

32

302

00

00

89

312

00

03

85

303

00

02

36

304

00

02

78

305

00

08

76

310

00

02

87

309

00

04

40

417(dsuky)

00

02

72

419

00

18

35

420

00

01

16

421

00

06

77

425

00

00

20

424

00

00

20

423

00

12

72

428

00

12

16

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3776

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

430

00

06

69

429

00

00

20

195(jkLrk)

00

02

27

658

00

02

88

657

00

03

65

656

00

00

20

660

00

02

93

661

00

03

52

659

00

02

06

105

00

01

65

662

00

03

16

104

00

03

86

663

00

04

34

103

00

08

48

664

00

00

38

102

00

09

52

49

00

04

60

48

00

04

40

44

00

21

22

665

00

00

20

45

00

00

76

41

00

08

30

42

00

03

96

37

00

00

20

43

00

04

41

1(dPpk jkLrk)

00

01

28

eouk

832 (fiQYM psuy)

00

01

37

Fkkuk uacj % 286

831

00

08

45

830

00

04

00

829

00

06

35

835

00

05

03

836

00

01

58

828

00

01

04

827

00

06

29

825

00

01

72

824

00

01

86

823

00

04

00

821

00

03

54

817

00

06

52

816

00

03

16

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3777

815

00

03

44

812

00

07

55

813

00

00

95

811

00

21

65

808

00

03

46

807

00

00

20

713(fiQYM psuy)

00

06

55

716

00

01

55

719

00

17

09

720

00

02

09

407

00

04

92

408

00

04

40

409

00

04

01

410

00

02

47

411

00

03

30

412

00

05

02

413

00

14

02

401

00

05

25

414

00

02

96

399

00

14

36

387(fiQYM psuy)

00

01

62

398

00

00

20

365

00

06

59

364

00

06

22

363

00

06

19

362

00

03

08

361

00

04

40

360

00

08

20

355(fiQYM psuy)

00

01

60

357

00

12

26

356

00

11

23

342

00

05

77

343

00

03

61

349

00

00

67

348

00

05

74

344

00

00

40

347@2035

00

09

17

346

00

00

76

347

00

00

48

2(jsYkos)

00

14

71

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3778

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

3

00

05

41

4

00

05

17

1272(dPpk jkLrk)

00

01

12

la/ku

1108(dPpk jkLrk)

00

00

88

Fkkuk uacj % 342

1083

00

00

20

1083

00

33

08

1084

00

00

20

1082

00

21

24

1072(dPpk jkLrk)

00

00

89

1071

00

00

20

¹iQk- la- vkj&25011@20@2013&vksvkj&Iº

iou oqQekj] voj lfpo

MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS

New Delhi, 27th July, 2013

S.O. 1532.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that a

pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited in Dist. Saran in the State of Bihar for ‘Patna to Motihari and

Baitalpur Pipeline’ for the transportation of Petroleum Product;

And, whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary

to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which is described in the

Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals

Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention

to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on

which the copies of the notification issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of

India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the

pipeline under the land, to Shri Arun Kumar Jha B.A.S. & Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited. (Pipelines

Division) P.O. Dhelwan, Sipara, Dist. Patna (Bihar.) Pin – 800020.

SCHEDULE

Dist.: Saran

State : Bihar

Mouja / Village

Survey/BlockNo.

Sub-Div-No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

RAIPUR BENGAWAN

313(River)

00

32

16

Thana Number : 523

121(River)

07

44

35

65

00

28

79

78

00

46

49

111/330

00

29

97

KHAWASPUR

248-(Cart Track)

00

01

64

KHURD

53

00

01

78

Thana No:-510

52

00

10

20

51

00

00

38

50

00

00

20

54

00

00

20

60

00

03

72

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3779

61

00

01

86

62

00

02

16

65

00

01

10

66

00

02

65

67

00

00

20

68

00

01

87

71

00

01

09

72

00

02

21

73

00

02

53

74

00

03

16

75

00

00

47

42

00

01

04

76

00

00

78

77

00

00

43

41(Cart Track)

00

00

14

40

00

05

75

39

00

00

20

13

00

03

42

14

00

01

12

15

00

02

75

16

00

00

96

19

00

00

20

20

00

00

20

12

00

07

09

11

00

04

08

10

00

00

20

7

00

00

37

8

00

06

16

6

00

04

63

5

00

01

19

1

00

00

66

KHAWASPUR Thana No.513

177

00

05

03

ISMAILPUR

183

00

01

10

Thana Number :- 509

181

00

07

51

182

00

05

78

180

00

00

88

118

00

07

64

119

00

00

98

120

00

00

24

117

00

00

53

115

00

01

18

114

00

10

32

121

00

04

70

122

00

00

24

123

00

00

24

113

00

00

42

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3780

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

96(Road)

00

03

23

50

00

00

20

49

00

07

50

48

00

03

35

47

00

00

24

43

00

04

03

44

00

00

24

42

00

03

08

39

00

00

37

40

00

00

20

38

00

03

83

37

00

00

58

36

00

00

24

36/219

00

00

78

38/216 (Cart Track)

00

01

13

JAGDISHPUR

993

00

01

68

Thana Number :- 508

939

00

01

79

940

00

00

20

941

00

00

20

832

00

00

20

938

00

04

81

937

00

02

99

936

00

03

43

835

00

05

20

836

00

07

96

837

00

00

20

845

00

04

72

846

00

00

20

844

00

00

20

851

00

01

33

850

00

02

95

849

00

00

48

858

00

02

54

859

00

00

20

857

00

01

21

864

00

02

14

865

00

01

36

863

00

00

52

872

00

01

54

871

00

01

94

870

00

01

91

693

00

01

34

874

00

01

90

875

00

01

50

876

00

00

20

691

00

01

97

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3781

692

00

01

38

639

00

00

20

878

00

02

00

634

00

04

86

633

00

00

20

635

00

03

49

636

00

00

20

307(Road)

00

01

36

311

00

00

20

312

00

16

96

313

00

02

78

314

00

00

20

267

00

00

36

268

00

00

20

266

00

03

16

265

00

05

89

264

00

05

74

263

00

09

54

253

00

00

77

262

00

02

20

254

00

04

42

255

00

08

80

256

00

00

20

244

00

01

44

245

00

03

85

238

00

00

20

243

00

12

01

240

00

00

20

241

00

03

50

242

00

09

70

CHAK JAMALI

31

00

03

04

Thana Number :-507

54

00

00

66

32

00

05

69

30

00

00

34

29

00

00

20

33

00

16

46

35

00

00

20

37

00

02

46

38

00

02

48

39

00

02

12

40

00

00

20

41

00

05

58

42

00

01

78

7(Road)

00

02

62

14

00

00

32

15

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3782

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

13

00

08

52

12

00

00

20

9

00

01

51

11

00

00

92

10

00

05

60

4

00

10

15

QAZIPUR

584

00

06

26

Thana Number :- 514

585

00

05

41

586

00

17

16

720

00

00

20

583

00

00

31

587

00

04

75

580

00

00

20

579

00

02

17

578

00

00

20

597

00

00

20

598

00

14

51

577

00

00

68

576

00

00

20

599

00

04

91

600

00

05

66

601

00

09

22

602

00

03

71

605

00

00

20

607

00

00

20

567

00

00

65

606

00

11

63

565

00

06

23

562

00

04

82

561

00

00

20

529

00

02

48

528

00

00

20

530

00

07

50

531

00

02

57

532

00

00

20

535

00

00

20

533

00

06

64

534

00

06

44

520

00

00

40

519

00

06

97

518

00

02

87

468(RAILWAY)

00

05

87

453(RAILWAY)

00

04

74

463

00

03

11

464(Road)

00

01

40

422

00

05

30

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3783

426

00

00

61

425

00

02

57

423

00

10

20

424

00

00

90

421

00

01

85

419

00

00

37

420

00

05

28

418

00

00

20

415

00

00

20

417

00

04

08

416

00

04

02

62

00

00

85

61

00

01

79

59

00

04

86

58

00

02

29

54

00

02

64

53

00

03

60

52

00

12

12

51

00

04

91

48

00

00

20

47

00

08

78

45

00

00

52

44

00

00

20

46

00

03

53

43

00

03

30

42

00

05

47

4

00

00

20

HASANPURA DAKHILIKHAL

103(Nala)

00

01

96

Thana Number - 517

64

00

06

66

63

00

03

65

62

00

07

55

61

00

03

52

56(Nala)

00

02

77

1(Nala)

00

03

07

HASANPURA

77

00

04

48

Thana Number :- 516

75

00

06

71

74

00

18

55

73

00

00

46

98

00

05

72

69

00

15

13

67

00

12

17

52(FIELD CHENNAL)

00

01

22

33

00

11

12

32(FIELD CHENNAL)

00

01

24

31

00

07

01

26

00

00

83

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3784

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

30

00

01

69

29

00

00

20

27

00

02

82

28

00

04

64

19

00

08

88

6

00

00

20

20

00

06

29

5

00

05

15

4

00

04

72

1

00

04

51

2

00

00

20

JALALPUR

7

00

01

97

Thana Number :- 515

6

00

03

06

5

00

01

14

4

00

01

45

3

00

03

06

2

00

03

71

1

00

00

50

MIRZAPUR

39

00

01

06

Thana Number :- 497

38(Field Channel)

00

02

39

244

00

00

52

32

00

12

50

31

00

06

44

30

00

05

30

29

00

00

20

28

00

05

50

26(Road)

00

05

27

12

00

02

38

13

00

08

88

14

00

00

20

21

00

02

93

20

00

13

09

1(Canal)

00

02

81

DHARAMPURA

516

00

03

00

Thana Number :- 305

442

00

04

18

443

00

00

20

450

00

00

20

453

00

15

44

454

00

00

73

457

00

00

20

452

00

17

08

458

00

05

06

459

00

00

20

439

00

07

82

438(Canal)

00

01

72

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3785

289(Canal)

00

04

66

243

00

00

77

242

00

00

20

288

00

01

99

287

00

03

06

286

00

02

83

285

00

03

48

284

00

03

08

283

00

02

44

282

00

03

19

281

00

02

56

280

00

01

61

279

00

12

77

278

00

00

64

277

00

00

20

JILKABAD

1436

00

01

39

Thana Number : 495

1435

00

10

04

1432

00

03

87

1432/1535

00

01

16

1431

00

04

16

1431/1534

00

01

26

1428

00

19

49

1427

00

05

71

1426

00

02

50

1423

00

05

42

1422

00

01

74

1421

00

01

28

1418

00

02

23

1419

00

00

32

1414

00

00

20

1417

00

06

58

1415

00

04

07

1416

00

00

20

1393

00

09

35

1400

00

03

91

1401

00

00

20

1399

00

00

20

1383

00

04

05

1382

00

00

93

1403

00

05

28

1382-1537

00

09

95

1404

00

04

89

1370

00

00

20

1371(Field Channel)

00

00

52

1372

00

00

54

1331

00

19

46

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3786

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1332

00

02

98

1332/1538

00

02

84

1333

00

02

18

1333/1539

00

01

60

1342

00

01

15

1329(Field Channel)

00

01

84

1328

00

00

20

1327/1536

00

00

70

1327

00

06

89

1321

00

04

60

1320

00

02

65

1322

00

01

54

1326

00

00

20

1322

00

05

10

1319

00

01

14

1316(Field Channel)

00

01

89

PIRARI Thana Number : 306

1371(Field Channel)

00

01

68

1427

00

27

00

1426

00

06

13

1428

00

29

29

1424

00

00

20

1429

00

00

20

1398

00

36

43

769

00

02

14

761

00

02

15

762

00

01

54

763

00

01

98

767

00

01

70

768

00

00

20

1430(Cart Track)

00

01

27

DARIYAW GANJ

2(Nala)

00

00

20

Thana Number : 303

MAHRAJ GANJ Thana Number :- 308

44(Field Channel)

00

01

80

43

00

02

97

42

00

04

33

41

00

04

25

40

00

02

64

39

00

02

03

38

00

02

67

37

00

03

98

35

00

03

86

34

00

04

21

32

00

05

01

31

00

00

86

30

00

10

13

23

00

02

07

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3787

29

00

00

20

22

00

03

48

21

00

06

26

20

00

03

00

18

00

02

41

14

00

02

49

13

00

03

61

12

00

03

52

11

00

11

17

10

00

01

79

4

00

04

63

2

00

01

21

1(Road)

00

02

57

BISHUNPURA

2350(Road)

00

03

04

Thana Number :- 314

2348

00

05

60

2346

00

00

20

2347

00

06

35

2340

00

03

54

2339

00

03

14

2338

00

03

65

2311

00

03

02

2315

00

03

44

2318

00

02

80

2294

00

02

98

2293

00

03

32

2290

00

06

41

2291

00

00

20

2286

00

05

17

2285

00

03

17

2228(Field Channel)

00

02

96

2227

00

16

26

2229

00

04

31

2230

00

02

09

2226

00

01

63

2231

00

04

19

2225

00

10

44

2224

00

00

85

2223(Field Channel)

00

01

43

2134

00

06

13

2129

00

08

70

2026

00

05

41

2027

00

02

21

2028

00

03

10

2025

00

00

20

2031

00

04

52

2032

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3788

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2039

00

04

80

2040

00

03

92

2042

00

04

74

2048

00

03

68

2022(Field Channel)

00

01

43

1911

00

04

33

1912

00

04

10

1913

00

03

05

1914

00

02

22

1915

00

04

50

1918

00

02

66

1919

00

00

48

1939

00

00

20

1990(Field Channel)

00

01

04

1950

00

02

52

1995

00

03

37

1994

00

00

20

1987

00

11

30

1988

00

00

20

1986

00

06

68

1985

00

06

61

1983

00

00

20

1958(Field Channel)

00

00

83

1952

00

03

70

1951

00

00

91

1953

00

07

22

1954

00

00

20

1956

00

05

72

1955

00

05

27

1860(Road)

00

01

08

1856(Road)

00

01

03

1811

00

07

26

1810

00

05

10

1808

00

00

20

1809

00

04

91

1804

00

04

30

1805

00

00

60

1802

00

03

02

1800

00

00

20

1799

00

02

96

1730(Field Channel)

00

03

44

1727

00

03

76

1726

00

04

40

1725

00

02

72

1719

00

00

20

1720

00

06

46

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3789

1717

00

05

72

1712

00

02

87

1711

00

03

19

1710

00

00

20

1707

00

03

35

1706

00

02

03

1705

00

02

16

1700

00

00

71

1702

00

02

70

1684

00

00

20

1683

00

00

20

1701

00

01

40

1685

00

03

54

1686

00

02

53

1688

00

01

64

1689

00

00

20

1687

00

02

90

1691

00

01

63

1692

00

03

32

1693

00

00

34

1493

00

02

16

1694

00

00

20

1281

00

05

64

1284

00

06

10

1280

00

00

20

1277

00

00

74

1278

00

05

57

1276

00

06

16

1275

00

05

02

1274

00

02

08

1272

00

00

95

1271

00

00

20

1270

00

00

20

1237

00

00

20

1238

00

00

20

1273

00

02

50

1236

00

04

08

1239

00

01

00

1240

00

04

30

1241

00

04

42

1200

00

00

20

1242

00

02

84

1199

00

00

72

1198

00

04

63

1169(Field Channel)

00

01

86

1120

00

09

14

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3790

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1121

00

00

20

1118

00

00

20

1123

00

00

20

1119

00

02

96

1122

00

06

05

1125

00

03

25

1131

00

00

20

1130

00

00

20

1126

00

02

63

1127

00

05

56

1128

00

06

78

1129

00

00

84

1054(Road)

00

01

84

706(Road)

00

01

30

1008

00

00

29

1009

00

08

96

1010

00

00

20

1011

00

09

49

1012

00

03

29

1013

00

02

89

1014

00

01

72

1015

00

01

55

1018

00

02

64

1019

00

08

87

935(Canal)

00

01

07

833

00

14

29

834

00

00

80

837

00

09

43

836

00

00

20

838(Field Channel)

00

01

06

845

00

00

20

846

00

18

40

848

00

00

20

847

00

02

09

886(Field Channel)

00

01

68

112

00

10

06

113

00

07

12

111

00

01

30

114

00

02

76

115

00

00

23

116

00

14

96

109

00

00

20

117

00

04

02

108

00

08

69

90

00

03

78

91

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3791

89

00

03

24

73

00

03

07

80

00

00

24

79

00

02

20

74

00

00

74

77

00

00

20

76

00

00

20

78

00

05

98

MOBARAKPUR

884

00

09

41

Thana Number :- 317

886

00

00

20

887

00

00

20

880

00

03

16

883

00

16

88

876

00

09

29

875(Road)

00

01

82

874(Road)

00

01

12

873

00

06

55

835

00

05

24

836

00

05

03

838

00

06

38

837

00

00

20

839

00

02

22

840

00

07

68

841

00

01

27

843

00

00

29

842

00

13

69

818(Field Channel)

00

01

38

737

00

17

15

733

00

17

22

732(Field Channel)

00

01

44

730

00

05

15

714

00

07

39

715

00

07

31

713

00

08

57

716

00

00

20

709

00

02

66

708

00

00

89

710

00

03

16

711

00

01

52

712

00

00

20

695

00

10

03

694

00

05

53

682

00

09

85

681

00

06

13

680

00

00

20

683

00

00

68

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3792

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

678

00

00

20

679

00

08

15

697(Road)

00

01

79

MALA SHERPUR

664(Road)

00

01

44

Thana Number :- 315

90

00

05

96

89(Field Channel)

00

02

71

91

00

00

55

88

00

02

24

77

00

10

13

74

00

00

20

78

00

09

08

79

00

01

19

80

00

00

20

72

00

11

72

71(Field Channel)

00

01

60

70

00

02

68

69

00

00

54

68

00

00

92

67

00

01

90

64

00

06

66

63

00

03

79

59

00

02

27

50

00

02

89

58

00

00

90

52

00

16

40

53

00

00

20

51

00

03

30

153(Field Channel)

00

01

37

MALA MIRZA TUKRA

151 (Field Channel)

00

01

20

Thana Number : 291

15

00

14

76

13

00

21

82

12(Road)

00

00

92

11(Road)

00

00

84

10(Road)

00

01

00

6

00

02

80

5

00

03

80

7

00

07

88

4

00

06

61

3

00

08

03

MAHAMDA

4288

00

05

31

Thana Number : 334

4287

00

00

31

4289

00

00

71

4286

00

11

42

4285

00

03

08

4296(Nala)

00

01

01

4772

00

06

87

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3793

4283

00

22

97

4282(Road)

00

01

96

4281(Road)

00

04

59

4280(Canal)

00

00

91

4279

00

24

86

4209(Road)

00

02

94

4207

00

00

38

4206

00

00

20

4201

00

10

10

4202

00

03

04

4198

00

04

64

4203

00

07

36

4204

00

01

08

MEHIAN

286

00

01

47

Thana Number : 290

285

00

06

77

288

00

00

20

284

00

00

30

289

00

06

97

342

00

00

37

297

00

08

59

296

00

00

20

340

00

00

42

339

00

00

77

338

00

01

56

298

00

10

30

323

00

06

88

1360

00

00

20

299

00

00

49

300

00

00

33

322

00

08

29

301

00

00

32

302

00

00

89

312

00

03

85

303

00

02

36

304

00

02

78

305

00

08

76

310

00

02

87

309

00

04

40

417(Canal)

00

02

72

419

00

18

35

420

00

01

16

421

00

06

77

425

00

00

20

424

00

00

20

423

00

12

72

428

00

12

16

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3794

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

430

00

06

69

429

00

00

20

195(Road)

00

02

27

658

00

02

88

657

00

03

65

656

00

00

20

660

00

02

93

661

00

03

52

659

00

02

06

105

00

01

65

662

00

03

16

104

00

03

86

663

00

04

34

103

00

08

48

664

00

00

38

102

00

09

52

49

00

04

60

48

00

04

40

44

00

21

22

665

00

00

20

45

00

00

76

41

00

08

30

42

00

03

96

37

00

00

20

43

00

04

41

1(Cart Track)

00

01

28

MAWNA Thana Number - 286

832 (Field Channel)

00

01

37

831

00

08

45

830

00

04

00

829

00

06

35

835

00

05

03

836

00

01

58

828

00

01

04

827

00

06

29

825

00

01

72

824

00

01

86

823

00

04

00

821

00

03

54

817

00

06

52

816

00

03

16

815

00

03

44

812

00

07

55

813

00

00

95

811

00

21

65

808

00

03

46

807

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3795

713(Field Channel)

00

06

55

716

00

01

55

719

00

17

09

720

00

02

09

407

00

04

92

408

00

04

40

409

00

04

01

410

00

02

47

411

00

03

30

412

00

05

02

413

00

14

02

401

00

05

25

414

00

02

96

399

00

14

36

387(Field Channel)

00

01

62

398

00

00

20

365

00

06

59

364

00

06

22

363

00

06

19

362

00

03

08

361

00

04

40

360

00

08

20

355 (Field Channel)

00

01

60

357

00

12

26

356

00

11

23

342

00

05

77

343

00

03

61

349

00

00

67

348

00

05

74

344

00

00

40

347/ 2035

00

09

17

346

00

00

76

347

00

00

48

2(Railway)

00

14

71

3

00

05

41

4

00

05

17

1272(Cart Track)

00

01

12

SANDHAN

1108(Cart Track)

00

00

88

Thana No : 342

1083

00

00

20

1083

00

33

08

1084

00

00

20

1082

00

21

24

1072(Cart Track)

00

00

89

1071

00

00

20

[F. No. R-25011/20/ 2013-OR-I]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

ubZ fnYyh] 27 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk-

1533-—dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slk izrhr gksrk gS fd yksd fgr esa ;g vko';d gS fd iVuk ls eksfrgkjh vkSj csrkyiqj

rd isVªksfy;e inkFkksZ ds ifjogu gsrq ftyk lkju] jkT; fcgkj esa bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkuh pkfg, A

vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slh ikbiykbu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, vko';d izrhr gksrk gS fd ml Hkwfe esa ftlds Hkhrj mDr

ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkus dk izLrko gS vkSj tks bl vf/lwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa o£.kr gS] mi;ksx dk vtZu fd;k tk, A

vr% vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbUl (Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/dkj dk vtZu) vf/fu;e] 1962 (1962

dk 50) dh /kjk 3 dh mi/kjk(1) }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] mDr Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/dkj dk vtZu djus ds vius vk'k;

dh ?kks"k.kk djrh gSA

dksbZ O;fDr] tks mDr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa fgrc¼ gS] ml rkjh[k ls ftldks] Hkkjr ds jkti=k esa ;Fkk izdkf'kr bl

vfèklwpuk dh izfr;ka lk/kj.k turk dks miyC/ djk nh tkrh gS] bDdhl fnu ds vUnj] Hkwfe ds Hkhrj ikbiykbu fcNk, tkus gsrq mi;ksx

ds vf/dkj ds vtZu ds fy,] Jh v:.k dqekj >k] fc-iz-ls- o l{ke izkf/dkjh bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM] (ikbiykbu fMohtu)

iVuk] iks-vks- <syok] flikjk] ftyk iVuk] fiu% 800020] fcgkj dks fyf[kr :i eas vk{ksi Hkst ldsxkA

vuqlwph

ftyk % lkju

jkT; % fcgkj

ekStk@xzke

losZ@Cykd@la- (IyksV la-)

lc&Mho&la-

{ks=kiQy

gsDVs;j

vkjs

oxZ ehVj

1

2

3

4

5

6

esFkokyh;k

463¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

00

60

Fkkuk uacj % 343

467

00

02

72

466

00

04

91

465

00

02

05

464

00

00

20

468

00

16

81

462

00

01

30

469

00

02

99

471

00

00

20

470

00

16

42

459

00

00

20

458

00

02

69

837 ¼vu ykbUM dsuky½

00

01

72

456

00

07

55

450

00

06

95

451

00

00

54

316

00

00

77

315

00

10

02

314

00

01

36

88

00

00

60

89

00

03

28

83

00

00

20

91

00

00

20

92

00

00

78

87

00

01

42

93

00

05

47

3796

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3797

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

95

00

07

94

100

00

00

20

96

00

00

20

97

00

09

53

98

00

02

41

99

00

00

20

110

00

00

20

141¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

01

50

66

00

00

20

64

00

02

10

63

00

08

65

62

00

01

44

60

00

01

63

61

00

06

36

33

00

00

20

32

00

00

20

31

00

00

20

30

00

00

20

29

00

00

20

34

00

05

78

35

00

11

77

36

00

00

78

28

00

07

00

26

00

00

20

27

00

01

84

pu pkSju

825

00

07

38

Fkkuk uacj % 345

824

00

29

39

816

00

00

20

815

00

00

20

814

00

02

83

813

00

02

82

224

00

05

65

225

00

07

81

223

00

00

85

222

00

01

02

221

00

01

03

220

00

00

95

219

00

00

41

218

00

00

47

217

00

00

73

226

00

31

46

216

00

01

58

215

00

01

96

3798

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

214

00

02

52

213

00

03

64

234

00

00

20

212¼jkLrk½

00

01

13

211¼jkLrk½

00

03

31

210¼jkLrk½

00

02

23

177

00

03

67

178

00

05

77

176

00

00

20

175

00

06

70

174

00

05

46

173

00

04

01

gluiqjk

480

00

00

52

Fkkuk uacj % 344

481

00

13

03

472¼fQYM psuy½

00

01

43

470

00

05

00

469

00

01

08

468

00

00

81

471

00

09

96

472¼fQYM psuy½

00

01

68

473

00

11

16

464

00

05

09

465

00

04

91

472¼fQYM psuy½

00

01

34

466¼fQYM psuy½

00

01

72

467

00

04

11

185

00

19

24

188

00

00

20

186

00

19

32

187@492

00

00

20

176

00

03

35

182

00

00

20

183

00

45

41

jruiqjk

20

00

05

07

Fkkuk uacj % 283

19

00

14

21

18

00

06

00

14

00

06

60

12

00

17

66

11

00

07

18

972¼jkLrk½

00

01

59

971¼jkLrk½

00

01

45

970¼jkLrk½

00

02

19

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3799

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

cjgkeiqj

4958¼ukyk½

00

01

95

Fkkuk uacj % 277

4277

00

00

20

4278

00

05

44

4281

00

04

94

4280

00

08

54

4279

00

07

53

4291¼ukyk½

00

01

77

4282

00

00

20

4293

00

07

23

4292

00

19

61

4295¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

00

92

4329

00

06

84

4330

00

14

91

4339¼ukyk½

00

01

08

4340

00

23

96

4326¼ukyk½

00

02

73

4353

00

23

27

4352

00

17

76

4351

00

26

83

4350

00

10

27

3555¼ukyk½

00

01

34

3547

00

00

42

3546

00

00

58

3545

00

00

75

3542

00

01

26

3541

00

01

14

3540

00

00

20

3535

00

02

08

3534

00

01

92

3533

00

02

22

3530

00

02

81

3531

00

00

20

3529

00

03

43

3526

00

03

00

3523

00

02

96

3524

00

00

20

3522

00

00

69

3521

00

05

40

3518

00

05

74

3519

00

00

20

3516

00

03

10

3517

00

01

12

3515

00

02

26

3514

00

01

16

3800

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3513

00

01

85

3511

00

03

52

3509

00

00

20

3510

00

06

12

3506

00

04

34

3507

00

00

20

3501

00

00

20

3505

00

01

13

3502

00

06

13

3500¼ukyk½

00

00

88

3293

00

18

46

3294

00

08

87

3295

00

03

23

3296

00

00

20

3292

00

02

74

3291

00

00

20

3275

00

03

80

3272

00

04

66

3268

00

01

57

3267

00

01

52

3266

00

04

01

3265

00

03

56

3264

00

03

54

3247

00

03

74

3246

00

03

59

3245

00

01

64

3226

00

00

20

3244

00

02

90

3227

00

00

20

3243

00

04

22

3228

00

00

20

3242

00

03

46

3241

00

03

29

3229

00

01

54

3232

00

01

31

3240

00

02

36

3239

00

02

16

3233

00

02

40

3238

00

01

11

3237

00

00

88

3234

00

04

82

3235

00

01

50

3211¼ukyk½

00

01

31

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3801

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3210¼ukyk½

00

01

22

lh/kokyh;k

926¼ukyk½

00

00

92

Fkkuk uacj % 276

924

00

00

82

925

00

02

32

917

00

08

49

916

00

03

10

915

00

02

75

918

00

08

70

923

00

00

20

922

00

00

20

921

00

00

36

920

00

00

63

919

00

00

35

904

00

06

77

553

00

02

87

552

00

03

63

551

00

05

94

550

00

04

94

549

00

03

87

544

00

03

27

545

00

00

20

543

00

02

73

542

00

01

88

541

00

00

87

540

00

00

64

539

00

00

37

538

00

00

33

536

00

00

20

537

00

00

20

Qdqyh

3099¼ukyk½

00

01

38

Fkkuk uacj % 260

3005

00

03

09

3006

00

02

50

3008

00

00

20

3007

00

01

59

3003

00

00

20

3004

00

04

13

3013

00

00

20

3012

00

00

20

3043

00

00

20

3042

00

00

20

3014

00

06

42

3015

00

00

20

3020

00

05

33

3802

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3021

00

02

05

3022

00

08

71

3037

00

00

20

3029

00

05

78

3030

00

02

44

3035

00

00

20

3031

00

00

87

3032

00

01

06

3028

00

00

20

3027

00

08

09

3026

00

00

20

3025

00

00

20

3033

00

04

26

3034

00

00

20

2924¼ukyk½

00

00

71

2882

00

08

37

2881

00

00

20

2883

00

03

70

2886

00

02

93

2885

00

04

69

2889

00

01

14

2904

00

00

70

2884

00

00

20

2905

00

05

01

2906

00

00

86

2907

00

00

20

2911

00

05

45

2910

00

03

03

2909

00

00

20

2711¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

00

67

2678

00

00

20

2677

00

07

58

2673

00

00

20

2674

00

01

29

2675

00

03

28

2676

00

00

49

2672¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

00

86

2670

00

07

52

2664

00

04

28

2663

00

00

99

2662

00

00

20

2669

00

00

20

2666

00

02

05

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3803

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

2667

00

00

20

2665

00

02

21

2632

00

04

05

2642

00

00

20

2631

00

00

20

2630

00

00

39

2633

00

01

91

2634

00

00

68

2641

00

00

20

2635

00

02

19

2629

00

00

89

2628

00

04

00

2627

00

00

89

2610¼ukyk½

00

09

37

2626

00

00

41

2624

00

00

20

1197

00

00

97

1205¼jkLrk½

00

00

65

1226

00

03

49

2622

00

00

20

1227

00

03

26

1229

00

03

71

1230

00

03

57

1231

00

03

45

1232

00

01

44

1233

00

00

20

214¼jkLrk½

00

06

06

1256

00

00

20

1257

00

04

76

1258

00

03

21

1259

00

03

32

1260

00

03

45

1261

00

02

82

1253

00

00

20

1265

00

05

59

1262

00

00

91

1264

00

00

20

1265

00

01

41

1989

00

00

20

1988

00

01

57

1987

00

05

91

1986

00

08

01

1985

00

12

81

3804

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

1971

00

00

20

1984

00

04

32

1973

00

06

76

1974

00

04

46

1975

00

00

37

1949

00

03

85

1669

00

00

20

1948

00

03

53

1947

00

02

46

1946

00

06

58

1947

00

01

17

1945

00

03

66

1903

00

01

49

1904

00

00

20

1902

00

00

56

1897

00

19

50

1894

00

00

20

1901

00

00

37

1900

00

00

68

1899

00

00

28

1898

00

00

20

1895

00

00

20

1896

00

01

41

1850

00

03

45

1849

00

15

00

1848

00

00

20

1847

00

03

87

1802

00

00

20

1845

00

01

63

1846

00

06

99

1803

00

00

20

1804

00

00

20

1826

00

10

94

1827

00

00

20

1806

00

01

77

1825

00

03

32

1821

00

04

90

1824

00

01

34

1822

00

06

01

1823

00

02

02

1819

00

00

20

1820

00

02

01

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3805

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

jktey fijkjh

212

00

13

53

Fkkuk uacj % 261

211

00

00

20

218@1110

00

00

20

218

00

00

20

219

00

00

20

220

00

00

20

213

00

07

07

217

00

05

01

216

00

04

71

215

00

04

54

236

00

07

63

235

00

00

20

237

00

03

09

238

00

03

52

234

00

00

20

239

00

03

40

240

00

03

93

241

00

06

96

255

00

00

20

252

00

12

30

253

00

00

20

251

00

07

94

262@1112

00

00

20

250

00

04

25

262

00

00

20

249

00

04

34

267

00

00

14

268

00

00

35

269

00

04

64

283

00

01

21

280

00

15

14

279

00

00

20

281

00

01

26

308

00

05

16

306

00

19

29

316

00

00

20

354

00

02

02

353

00

01

51

352

00

02

51

351

00

02

02

350

00

02

62

342

00

13

65

349

00

02

07

348

00

01

29

3806

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

343

00

05

57

341

00

05

23

378

00

02

65

379

00

03

16

386

00

00

95

385

00

00

43

380

00

03

90

384

00

00

20

374

00

02

75

373

00

00

44

381

00

04

30

382

00

04

05

383

00

00

25

411¼ukyk½

00

01

68

420

00

06

54

427

00

00

20

419

00

06

87

421

00

07

07

422

00

00

20

424

00

03

24

423

00

04

40

425

00

02

49

Vsduokl

3252¼unh½

00

04

52

Fkkuk uacj % 263

3263

00

01

13

3250¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

01

26

3230

00

03

91

3231

00

00

20

3229

00

17

53

3228

00

07

74

3237

00

00

20

3170

00

06

94

3172

00

00

20

3152

00

00

20

3171

00

01

07

3175

00

00

20

3169

00

03

07

3163

00

00

52

3164

00

00

20

3168

00

09

38

3179

00

00

05

3144

00

02

01

3180

00

07

91

3186

00

00

20

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3807

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3143

00

00

04

3142

00

00

20

3103

00

01

88

3104

00

00

20

3102

00

16

07

3101

00

01

39

3100

00

00

20

3107

00

01

99

3106

00

00

20

3108

00

01

17

3097

00

04

33

3098

00

00

20

3111

00

00

53

3096

00

05

62

3095

00

03

88

3094

00

07

40

3092

00

00

20

3091

00

00

20

3093

00

00

20

3068

00

01

64

3031

00

01

10

3029

00

03

78

3066

00

01

73

3064

00

02

21

3063

00

02

34

3062

00

06

55

3050

00

00

27

3061

00

00

96

3060

00

00

97

3058

00

01

71

3057

00

01

01

3056

00

02

63

3055

00

02

50

3054

00

02

02

3251

00

00

65

3252

00

00

20

3053

00

00

20

3250

00

00

87

3249

00

00

88

3248

00

00

74

3247

00

00

31

3246

00

04

60

3045

00

00

20

3808

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

2913

00

00

48

3204¼ukyk½

00

02

69

3005¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

01

55

jsokjh

1032¼ukyk½

00

01

47

Fkkuk uacj % 262

2757¼ukyk½

00

01

75

1142

00

02

82

1143

00

02

27

1144

00

00

50

1145

00

00

34

1141

00

06

31

1140

00

01

89

1139

00

01

15

1138

00

01

64

1137

00

00

20

1136

00

08

85

1135

00

02

63

1134

00

01

13

1133

00

00

20

1128

00

06

90

1129

00

00

20

1127

00

00

20

1147

00

00

20

1148

00

08

57

1120

00

04

84

1119

00

01

57

1121

00

00

47

1118

00

03

95

1117

00

03

89

1150

00

01

12

1116

00

01

55

1114

00

00

20

1113

00

09

89

1112

00

02

93

1111

00

03

37

1101

00

00

33

1096

00

00

20

1097

00

03

43

1098

00

03

60

1095

00

00

31

1094

00

01

44

1093

00

04

60

1099

00

01

14

1092

00

03

96

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3809

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

1091

00

05

40

1090

00

00

72

1089

00

05

01

1082

00

00

55

1083

00

07

38

1084

00

00

20

1076

00

01

09

1075

00

07

46

1074¼ukyk½

00

01

49

1073¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

02

09

1054

00

04

93

1055

00

00

25

1056

00

00

20

1053

00

12

61

1052

00

06

01

1051

00

06

08

1050

00

03

60

1018

00

01

69

1049

00

01

21

1048

00

00

20

1019

00

07

61

1020

00

00

20

1022

00

24

95

1031

00

00

20

1014

00

04

08

1029

00

00

48

1026

00

00

20

1023

00

07

38

1024

00

03

60

1025

00

04

91

1059¼ukyk½

00

00

79

1071¼ukyk½

00

00

95

506

00

00

33

507

00

00

20

508

00

07

65

510

00

00

37

499

00

00

20

511

00

11

94

549@2780

00

00

20

512

00

00

28

514

00

04

74

515

00

05

28

517

00

00

20

3810

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

516

00

04

77

518

00

02

38

532

00

00

44

528

00

00

61

531

00

00

20

529

00

10

64

527

00

02

58

525

00

00

20

526

00

00

20

375

00

00

20

376

00

05

13

394

00

05

88

392

00

00

20

377

00

03

78

378

00

05

54

379

00

01

09

381

00

04

97

368

00

00

20

382

00

01

81

383

00

01

94

386

00

00

20

385

00

00

20

384

00

03

82

364

00

01

87

367

00

00

20

365

00

02

16

362

00

00

20

363

00

00

39

337

00

04

58

336

00

00

20

338

00

01

22

346

00

03

26

339

00

04

75

340

00

00

20

335

00

00

20

334

00

03

37

333

00

03

47

608¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

02

74

332¼ukyk½

00

02

82

330

00

00

20

329

00

02

49

324

00

03

22

323

00

04

38

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3811

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

322

00

03

12

321

00

01

72

319

00

02

26

318

00

02

18

317

00

04

14

316

00

04

37

315¼ukyk½

00

01

25

314

00

03

05

313

00

04

69

309

00

03

28

308

00

00

24

297

00

00

20

295

00

04

51

294

00

00

92

293

00

03

20

280

00

02

62

279

00

02

36

274

00

00

20

269

00

00

20

275

00

03

29

268

00

03

74

263

00

01

08

264

00

05

30

266

00

00

20

265

00

00

20

257

00

00

65

256

00

02

54

255

00

03

08

254

00

03

90

250

00

00

62

249

00

02

66

248

00

02

21

247

00

04

23

246

00

01

99

238

00

00

20

277¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

00

25

ikS[kj HkhUMk

389

00

02

88

Fkkuk uacj % 236

388

00

11

47

387

00

00

20

385

00

00

20

386

00

01

64

382¼jkLrk½

00

02

70

366

00

01

91

3812

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

365

00

00

37

367

00

01

80

370

00

01

54

368

00

00

27

369

00

04

36

378

00

00

20

377

00

00

27

376

00

02

68

375

00

02

83

301

00

00

20

349

00

10

47

339

00

00

54

348

00

03

19

347

00

02

37

341

00

00

20

346

00

01

45

345

00

00

74

344

00

01

17

342

00

00

20

343

00

04

54

292

00

00

20

280¼ukyk½

00

01

62

284

00

00

42

291

00

04

67

255

00

02

66

254

00

00

14

256

00

06

67

258

00

05

63

261

00

01

79

260

00

00

70

262

00

00

20

259

00

06

02

264

00

01

01

211

00

00

20

263

00

00

20

265

00

05

29

209

00

01

06

208

00

02

43

266

00

01

23

207

00

04

55

197

00

03

10

198

00

02

25

199

00

04

68

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3813

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

195

00

00

20

200

00

01

04

190

00

00

20

201

00

00

99

166

00

09

89

15

00

00

20

167

00

04

26

192

00

00

32

168

00

04

41

188

00

01

99

189

00

00

20

169

00

07

09

187

00

00

20

183

00

00

20

170

00

04

50

171

00

02

56

¹iQk- la- vkj&25011@20@2013&vksvkj&Iº

iou oqQekj] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 27th July, 2013

S.O. 1533.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that a

pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited in Dist. Saran in the State of Bihar for ‘Patna to Motihari and

Baitalpur Pipeline’ for the transportation of Petroleum Product;

And, whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary

to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which is described in the

Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals

Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention

to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on

which the copies of the notification issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of

India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the

pipeline under the land, to Shri Arun Kumar Jha B.A.S. & Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited. (Pipelines

Division) P.O. Dhelwan, Sipara, Dist. Patna (Bihar) Pin – 800020.

SCHEDULE

Dist.: Saran

State : Bihar

Mouja /Village

Survey/BlockNo.

Sub-Div-No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq. mtr.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

METHWALIA

463(Cart Track)

00

00

60

Thana Number : 343

467

00

02

72

466

00

04

91

465

00

02

05

464

00

00

20

468

00

16

81

462

00

01

30

469

00

02

99

3814

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

471

00

00

20

470

00

16

42

459

00

00

20

458

00

02

69

837(Unlined Canal)

00

01

72

456

00

07

55

450

00

06

95

451

00

00

54

316

00

00

77

315

00

10

02

314

00

01

36

88

00

00

60

89

00

03

28

83

00

00

20

91

00

00

20

92

00

00

78

87

00

01

42

93

00

05

47

95

00

07

94

100

00

00

20

96

00

00

20

97

00

09

53

98

00

02

41

99

00

00

20

110

00

00

20

141(Cart Track)

00

01

50

66

00

00

20

64

00

02

10

63

00

08

65

62

00

01

44

60

00

01

63

61

00

06

36

33

00

00

20

32

00

00

20

31

00

00

20

30

00

00

20

29

00

00

20

34

00

05

78

35

00

11

77

36

00

00

78

28

00

07

00

26

00

00

20

27

00

01

84

CHAN CHOURAN

825

00

07

38

Thana Number - 345

824

00

29

39

816

00

00

20

815

00

00

20

814

00

02

83

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3815

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

813

00

02

82

224

00

05

65

225

00

07

81

223

00

00

85

222

00

01

02

221

00

01

03

220

00

00

95

219

00

00

41

218

00

00

47

217

00

00

73

226

00

31

46

216

00

01

58

215

00

01

96

214

00

02

52

213

00

03

64

234

00

00

20

212(Road)

00

01

13

211(Road)

00

03

31

210(Road)

00

02

23

177

00

03

67

178

00

05

77

176

00

00

20

175

00

06

70

174

00

05

46

173

00

04

01

HASANPURA

480

00

00

52

Thana Number : 344

481

00

13

03

472(Field Channel)

00

01

43

470

00

05

00

469

00

01

08

468

00

00

81

471

00

09

96

472(Field Channel)

00

01

68

473

00

11

16

464

00

05

09

465

00

04

91

472(Field Channel)

00

01

34

466(Field Channel)

00

01

72

467

00

04

11

185

00

19

24

188

00

00

20

186

00

19

32

187/492

00

00

20

176

00

03

35

182

00

00

20

183

00

45

41

RATANPURA

20

00

05

07

Thana Number - 283

19

00

14

21

3816

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

18

00

06

00

14

00

06

60

12

00

17

66

11

00

07

18

972(Road)

00

01

59

971(Road)

00

01

45

970(Road)

00

02

19

BARHAMPUR

4958(Nala)

00

01

95

Thana Number - 277

4277

00

00

20

4278

00

05

44

4281

00

04

94

4280

00

08

54

4279

00

07

53

4291(Nala)

00

01

77

4282

00

00

20

4293

00

07

23

4292

00

19

61

4295(Cart Track)

00

00

92

4329

00

06

84

4330

00

14

91

4339(Nala)

00

01

08

4340

00

23

96

4326(Nala)

00

02

73

4353

00

23

27

4352

00

17

76

4351

00

26

83

4350

00

10

27

3555(Nala)

00

01

34

3547

00

00

42

3546

00

00

58

3545

00

00

75

3542

00

01

26

3541

00

01

14

3540

00

00

20

3535

00

02

08

3534

00

01

92

3533

00

02

22

3530

00

02

81

3531

00

00

20

3529

00

03

43

3526

00

03

00

3523

00

02

96

3524

00

00

20

3522

00

00

69

3521

00

05

40

3518

00

05

74

3519

00

00

20

3516

00

03

10

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3817

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3517

00

01

12

3515

00

02

26

3514

00

01

16

3513

00

01

85

3511

00

03

52

3509

00

00

20

3510

00

06

12

3506

00

04

34

3507

00

00

20

3501

00

00

20

3505

00

01

13

3502

00

06

13

3500(Nala)

00

00

88

3293

00

18

46

3294

00

08

87

3295

00

03

23

3296

00

00

20

3292

00

02

74

3291

00

00

20

3275

00

03

80

3272

00

04

66

3268

00

01

57

3267

00

01

52

3266

00

04

01

3265

00

03

56

3264

00

03

54

3247

00

03

74

3246

00

03

59

3245

00

01

64

3226

00

00

20

3244

00

02

90

3227

00

00

20

3243

00

04

22

3228

00

00

20

3242

00

03

46

3241

00

03

29

3229

00

01

54

3232

00

01

31

3240

00

02

36

3239

00

02

16

3233

00

02

40

3238

00

01

11

3237

00

00

88

3234

00

04

82

3235

00

01

50

3211(Nala)

00

01

31

3210(Nala)

00

01

22

SIDHWALIA

926(Nala)

00

00

92

3818

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

Thana Number - 276

924

00

00

82

925

00

02

32

917

00

08

49

916

00

03

10

915

00

02

75

918

00

08

70

923

00

00

20

922

00

00

20

921

00

00

36

920

00

00

63

919

00

00

35

904

00

06

77

553

00

02

87

552

00

03

63

551

00

05

94

550

00

04

94

549

00

03

87

544

00

03

27

545

00

00

20

543

00

02

73

542

00

01

88

541

00

00

87

540

00

00

64

539

00

00

37

538

00

00

33

536

00

00

20

537

00

00

20

PHAKULI

3099(Nala)

00

01

38

(Thana No : 260)

3005

00

03

09

3006

00

02

50

3008

00

00

20

3007

00

01

59

3003

00

00

20

3004

00

04

13

3013

00

00

20

3012

00

00

20

3043

00

00

20

3042

00

00

20

3014

00

06

42

3015

00

00

20

3020

00

05

33

3021

00

02

05

3022

00

08

71

3037

00

00

20

3029

00

05

78

3030

00

02

44

3035

00

00

20

3031

00

00

87

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3819

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3032

00

01

06

3028

00

00

20

3027

00

08

09

3026

00

00

20

3025

00

00

20

3033

00

04

26

3034

00

00

20

2924(Nala)

00

00

71

2882

00

08

37

2881

00

00

20

2883

00

03

70

2886

00

02

93

2885

00

04

69

2889

00

01

14

2904

00

00

70

2884

00

00

20

2905

00

05

01

2906

00

00

86

2907

00

00

20

2911

00

05

45

2910

00

03

03

2909

00

00

20

2711(Cart Track)

00

00

67

2678

00

00

20

2677

00

07

58

2673

00

00

20

2674

00

01

29

2675

00

03

28

2676

00

00

49

2672(Cart Track)

00

00

86

2670

00

07

52

2664

00

04

28

2663

00

00

99

2662

00

00

20

2669

00

00

20

2666

00

02

05

2667

00

00

20

2665

00

02

21

2632

00

04

05

2642

00

00

20

2631

00

00

20

2630

00

00

39

2633

00

01

91

2634

00

00

68

2641

00

00

20

2635

00

02

19

2629

00

00

89

2628

00

04

00

3820

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

2627

00

00

89

2610(Nala)

00

09

37

2626

00

00

41

2624

00

00

20

1197

00

00

97

1205(Road)

00

00

65

1226

00

03

49

2622

00

00

20

1227

00

03

26

1229

00

03

71

1230

00

03

57

1231

00

03

45

1232

00

01

44

1233

00

00

20

214(Road)

00

06

06

1256

00

00

20

1257

00

04

76

1258

00

03

21

1259

00

03

32

1260

00

03

45

1261

00

02

82

1253

00

00

20

1265

00

05

59

1262

00

00

91

1264

00

00

20

1265

00

01

41

1989

00

00

20

1988

00

01

57

1987

00

05

91

1986

00

08

01

1985

00

12

81

1971

00

00

20

1984

00

04

32

1973

00

06

76

1974

00

04

46

1975

00

00

37

1949

00

03

85

1669

00

00

20

1948

00

03

53

1947

00

02

46

1946

00

06

58

1947

00

01

17

1945

00

03

66

1903

00

01

49

1904

00

00

20

1902

00

00

56

1897

00

19

50

1894

00

00

20

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3821

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

1901

00

00

37

1900

00

00

68

1899

00

00

28

1898

00

00

20

1895

00

00

20

1896

00

01

41

1850

00

03

45

1849

00

15

00

1848

00

00

20

1847

00

03

87

1802

00

00

20

1845

00

01

63

1846

00

06

99

1803

00

00

20

1804

00

00

20

1826

00

10

94

1827

00

00

20

1806

00

01

77

1825

00

03

32

1821

00

04

90

1824

00

01

34

1822

00

06

01

1823

00

02

02

1819

00

00

20

1820

00

02

01

RAJMAL PIRARI

212

00

13

53

(Thana No. 261)

211

00

00

20

218/1110

00

00

20

218

00

00

20

219

00

00

20

220

00

00

20

213

00

07

07

217

00

05

01

216

00

04

71

215

00

04

54

236

00

07

63

235

00

00

20

237

00

03

09

238

00

03

52

234

00

00

20

239

00

03

40

240

00

03

93

241

00

06

96

255

00

00

20

252

00

12

30

253

00

00

20

251

00

07

94

262/1112

00

00

20

3822

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

250

00

04

25

262

00

00

20

249

00

04

34

267

00

00

14

268

00

00

35

269

00

04

64

283

00

01

21

280

00

15

14

279

00

00

20

281

00

01

26

308

00

05

16

306

00

19

29

316

00

00

20

354

00

02

02

353

00

01

51

352

00

02

51

351

00

02

02

350

00

02

62

342

00

13

65

349

00

02

07

348

00

01

29

343

00

05

57

341

00

05

23

378

00

02

65

379

00

03

16

386

00

00

95

385

00

00

43

380

00

03

90

384

00

00

20

374

00

02

75

373

00

00

44

381

00

04

30

382

00

04

05

383

00

00

25

411(Nala)

00

01

68

420

00

06

54

427

00

00

20

419

00

06

87

421

00

07

07

422

00

00

20

424

00

03

24

423

00

04

40

425

00

02

49

TEKNWAS

3252(Nadi)

00

04

52

Thana No. 263

3263

00

01

13

3250(Cart Track)

00

01

26

3230

00

03

91

3231

00

00

20

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3823

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3229

00

17

53

3228

00

07

74

3237

00

00

20

3170

00

06

94

3172

00

00

20

3152

00

00

20

3171

00

01

07

3175

00

00

20

3169

00

03

07

3163

00

00

52

3164

00

00

20

3168

00

09

38

3179

00

00

05

3144

00

02

01

3180

00

07

91

3186

00

00

20

3143

00

00

04

3142

00

00

20

3103

00

01

88

3104

00

00

20

3102

00

16

07

3101

00

01

39

3100

00

00

20

3107

00

01

99

3106

00

00

20

3108

00

01

17

3097

00

04

33

3098

00

00

20

3111

00

00

53

3096

00

05

62

3095

00

03

88

3094

00

07

40

3092

00

00

20

3091

00

00

20

3093

00

00

20

3068

00

01

64

3031

00

01

10

3029

00

03

78

3066

00

01

73

3064

00

02

21

3063

00

02

34

3062

00

06

55

3050

00

00

27

3061

00

00

96

3060

00

00

97

3058

00

01

71

3057

00

01

01

3056

00

02

63

3055

00

02

50

3824

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3054

00

02

02

3251

00

00

65

3252

00

00

20

3053

00

00

20

3250

00

00

87

3249

00

00

88

3248

00

00

74

3247

00

00

31

3246

00

04

60

3045

00

00

20

2913

00

00

48

3204(Nala)

00

02

69

3005(Cart Track)

00

01

55

REWARI No. 262

1032(Nala)

00

01

47

2757(Nala)

00

01

75

1142

00

02

82

1143

00

02

27

1144

00

00

50

1145

00

00

34

1141

00

06

31

1140

00

01

89

1139

00

01

15

1138

00

01

64

1137

00

00

20

1136

00

08

85

1135

00

02

63

1134

00

01

13

1133

00

00

20

1128

00

06

90

1129

00

00

20

1127

00

00

20

1147

00

00

20

1148

00

08

57

1120

00

04

84

1119

00

01

57

1121

00

00

47

1118

00

03

95

1117

00

03

89

1150

00

01

12

1116

00

01

55

1114

00

00

20

1113

00

09

89

1112

00

02

93

1111

00

03

37

1101

00

00

33

1096

00

00

20

1097

00

03

43

1098

00

03

60

1095

00

00

31

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3825

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

1094

00

01

44

1093

00

04

60

1099

00

01

14

1092

00

03

96

1091

00

05

40

1090

00

00

72

1089

00

05

01

1082

00

00

55

1083

00

07

38

1084

00

00

20

1076

00

01

09

1075

00

07

46

1074(Nala)

00

01

49

1073(Cart Track)

00

02

09

1054

00

04

93

1055

00

00

25

1056

00

00

20

1053

00

12

61

1052

00

06

01

1051

00

06

08

1050

00

03

60

1018

00

01

69

1049

00

01

21

1048

00

00

20

1019

00

07

61

1020

00

00

20

1022

00

24

95

1031

00

00

20

1014

00

04

08

1029

00

00

48

1026

00

00

20

1023

00

07

38

1024

00

03

60

1025

00

04

91

1059(Nala)

00

00

79

1071(Nala)

00

00

95

506

00

00

33

507

00

00

20

508

00

07

65

510

00

00

37

499

00

00

20

511

00

11

94

549/2780

00

00

20

512

00

00

28

514

00

04

74

515

00

05

28

517

00

00

20

516

00

04

77

3826

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

518

00

02

38

532

00

00

44

528

00

00

61

531

00

00

20

529

00

10

64

527

00

02

58

525

00

00

20

526

00

00

20

375

00

00

20

376

00

05

13

394

00

05

88

392

00

00

20

377

00

03

78

378

00

05

54

379

00

01

09

381

00

04

97

368

00

00

20

382

00

01

81

383

00

01

94

386

00

00

20

385

00

00

20

384

00

03

82

364

00

01

87

367

00

00

20

365

00

02

16

362

00

00

20

363

00

00

39

337

00

04

58

336

00

00

20

338

00

01

22

346

00

03

26

339

00

04

75

340

00

00

20

335

00

00

20

334

00

03

37

333

00

03

47

608(Cart Track)

00

02

74

332(Nala)

00

02

82

330

00

00

20

329

00

02

49

324

00

03

22

323

00

04

38

322

00

03

12

321

00

01

72

319

00

02

26

318

00

02

18

317

00

04

14

316

00

04

37

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3827

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

315(Nala)

00

01

25

314

00

03

05

313

00

04

69

309

00

03

28

308

00

00

24

297

00

00

20

295

00

04

51

294

00

00

92

293

00

03

20

280

00

02

62

279

00

02

36

274

00

00

20

269

00

00

20

275

00

03

29

268

00

03

74

263

00

01

08

264

00

05

30

266

00

00

20

265

00

00

20

257

00

00

65

256

00

02

54

255

00

03

08

254

00

03

90

250

00

00

62

249

00

02

66

248

00

02

21

247

00

04

23

246

00

01

99

238

00

00

20

277(Cart Track)

00

00

25

POKHAR BHINDA

389

00

02

88

Thana Number - 236

388

00

11

47

387

00

00

20

385

00

00

20

386

00

01

64

382(Road)

00

02

70

366

00

01

91

365

00

00

37

367

00

01

80

370

00

01

54

368

00

00

27

369

00

04

36

378

00

00

20

377

00

00

27

376

00

02

68

375

00

02

83

301

00

00

20

349

00

10

47

339

00

00

54

348

00

03

19

347

00

02

37

341

00

00

20

346

00

01

45

345

00

00

74

344

00

01

17

342

00

00

20

343

00

04

54

292

00

00

20

280(Nala)

00

01

62

284

00

00

42

291

00

04

67

255

00

02

66

254

00

00

14

256

00

06

67

258

00

05

63

261

00

01

79

260

00

00

70

262

00

00

20

259

00

06

02

264

00

01

01

211

00

00

20

263

00

00

20

265

00

05

29

209

00

01

06

208

00

02

43

266

00

01

23

207

00

04

55

197

00

03

10

198

00

02

25

199

00

04

68

195

00

00

20

200

00

01

04

190

00

00

20

201

00

00

99

166

00

09

89

15

00

00

20

167

00

04

26

192

00

00

32

168

00

04

41

188

00

01

99

189

00

00

20

169

00

07

09

187

00

00

20

183

00

00

20

170

00

04

50

171

00

02

56

[F. No. R-25011/20/2013-OR-I]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

3828

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

ubZ fnYyh] 27 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1534-—dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slk izrhr gksrk gS fd yksd fgr esa ;g vko';d gS fd iVuk ls eksfrgkjh vkSj csrkyiqj rd

isVªksfy;e inkFkksZ ds ifjogu gsrq ftyk lkju] jkT; fcgkj esa bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkuh pkfg, A

vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slh ikbiykbu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, vko';d izrhr gksrk gS fd ml Hkwfe esa ftlds Hkhrj mDr

ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkus dk izLrko gS vkSj tks bl vf/lwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa o£.kr gS] mi;ksx dk vtZu fd;k tk, A

vr% vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbUl (Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/dkj dk vtZu) vf/fu;e] 1962

(1962 dk 50) dh /kjk 3 dh mi&/kjk (1) }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] mDr Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/dkj dk vtZu djus ds

vius vk'k; dh ?kks"k.kk djrh gSA

dksbZ O;fDr] tks mDr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa fgrc¼ gS] ml rkjh[k ls ftldks] Hkkjr ds jkti=k esa ;Fkk izdkf'kr bl

vfèklwpuk dh izfr;ka lk/kj.k turk dks miyC/ djk nh tkrh gS] bDdhl fnu ds vUnj] Hkwfe ds Hkhrj ikbiykbu fcNk, tkus gsrq mi;ksx

ds vf/dkj ds vtZu ds fy,] Jh v:.k dqekj >k] fc-iz-ls- o l{ke izkf/dkjh bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM] (ikbiykbu fMohtu)

iVuk] iks-vks- <syok] flikjk] ftyk iVuk] fiu% 800020] fcgkj dks fyf[kr :i eas vk{ksi Hkst ldsxk A

vuqlwph

ftyk % lkju

jkT; % fcgkj

ekStk@xzke

losZ@Cykd@la- (IyksV la-)

lc&Mho&la-

{ks=kiQy

gsDVs;j

vkjs

oxZ ehVj

1

2

3

4

5

6

legqrk

legqrk

legqrk

legqrk

legqrk

6407

00

02

50

Fkkuk uacj

Fkkuk uacj

Fkkuk uacj

Fkkuk uacj

Fkkuk uacj-&234

-&234

-&234

-&234

-&234

6406

00

06

99

6405

00

03

36

6404

00

08

34

6410

00

00

20

6397

00

02

69

6412

00

02

27

6413

00

00

20

6402

00

02

88

6401

00

03

83

6403

00

01

08

6400

00

02

80

6432

00

00

20

6431

00

00

20

6433

00

00

14

6399

00

01

76

6434

00

02

52

6392

00

01

23

6440

00

02

59

6441

00

04

68

6439

00

00

58

6442

00

03

87

6443

00

04

80

6444

00

00

80

6447

00

00

20

6445

00

05

23

6446

00

06

24

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3829

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3830

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

6451

00

00

62

6553

00

04

90

6552

00

01

92

3971

00

00

20

6479

00

00

20

3969

00

37

45

3968

00

00

20

3980

00

05

28

3962

00

00

25

3961

00

02

10

3960

00

00

20

3956

00

00

20

3946

00

01

12

3981

00

03

92

3982

00

00

76

3983

00

00

20

3984

00

00

20

3945

00

09

24

3944

00

01

75

3943

00

12

44

3922

00

00

20

3995

00

00

96

3931

00

01

95

3932

00

00

20

3930

00

02

70

3929

00

03

22

3928

00

02

27

3927

00

02

53

4000

00

00

20

3926

00

08

85

4001

00

08

65

4002

00

00

45

4004

00

00

20

4005

00

15

92

4006¼jkLrk½

00

01

34

4007¼jkLrk½

00

01

31

4008¼jkLrk½

00

02

18

4009

00

06

47

4010

00

02

29

4011

00

14

20

4012

00

05

28

4013

00

15

28

4014

00

02

01

4024

00

11

09

4027

00

27

87

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3831

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4031

00

01

27

4034

00

04

28

4033

00

03

18

4032

00

03

74

3859

00

05

05

3851

00

22

57

3852

00

02

77

3853

00

02

10

3850

00

00

20

3823

00

04

80

3854

00

00

20

3830

00

00

20

3822

00

06

06

3824

00

00

56

3749

00

03

79

3748

00

04

48

3750

00

01

74

3745

00

00

20

3751

00

06

95

3752

00

00

20

3753

00

00

20

3744

00

00

20

3743

00

03

44

3754

00

09

82

3755

00

03

35

3756

00

02

86

3757

00

03

41

3740

00

00

20

3760

00

04

73

3759

00

00

20

3761

00

07

32

4143

00

00

20

3762

00

09

58

4142

00

01

69

4141

00

01

65

4139

00

01

01

4140

00

07

84

4138

00

01

07

4159

00

11

39

4157

00

00

20

4160

00

00

66

4158

00

02

27

4186

00

12

75

4184

00

00

20

4184

00

01

59

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3832

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

4185

00

06

76

4187

00

02

81

4188

00

08

23

4189

00

08

86

4190

00

01

79

4191

00

00

20

4214¼jkLrk½

00

04

15

4256

00

05

00

4222

00

00

36

4223

00

07

54

4228

00

01

88

4229

00

00

20

4227

00

04

86

4226

00

00

20

4230

00

06

26

4231

00

00

20

4233

00

06

65

4235

00

03

95

4238

00

00

20

4236

00

03

54

4237

00

05

61

5791

00

01

56

4240

00

00

66

5790

00

06

74

5789@7184

00

00

20

5789

00

06

99

5788@7182

00

00

79

5788

00

06

92

5786

00

00

20

5787

00

02

00

dksik

dksik

dksik

dksik

dksik

767

00

13

75

Fkkuk uacj

Fkkuk uacj

Fkkuk uacj

Fkkuk uacj

Fkkuk uacj-&231

-&231

-&231

-&231

-&231

763

00

00

20

766

00

05

90

764

00

01

46

765

00

04

33

760

00

02

32

583

00

00

66

584

00

09

60

585

00

02

86

586

00

00

20

580

00

06

06

579

00

00

42

590

00

00

20

591

00

08

18

578

00

03

72

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3833

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

592

00

06

23

564

00

02

04

563

00

08

29

593

00

00

20

562

00

01

01

559

00

02

29

560

00

04

88

558

00

06

18

557

00

00

84

556

00

10

55

533

00

00

20

555

00

01

53

545

00

00

20

534

00

04

45

542

00

02

67

535

00

00

84

541

00

05

24

540

00

03

90

397

00

05

67

396

00

00

27

321

00

00

20

322

00

00

20

317

00

00

63

316

00

00

73

315

00

00

91

313

00

05

81

283¼jkLrk½

00

00

87

254

00

04

19

253

00

06

93

252

00

04

34

251

00

00

11

250

00

00

47

249

00

01

62

248

00

02

08

247

00

05

61

246

00

00

73

181

00

04

91

185

00

06

01

182

00

00

20

183

00

00

20

184

00

02

63

173

00

00

20

171

00

00

20

172

00

06

89

168

00

00

74

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3834

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

170

00

04

70

169

00

01

30

156

00

15

24

155

00

00

20

157

00

03

92

159

00

00

93

158

00

04

05

110

00

02

95

111

00

02

57

127

00

00

20

112

00

05

26

113

00

04

22

114

00

07

24

115

00

00

51

116

00

01

77

117

00

00

20

12

00

16

72

120

00

00

20

119

00

00

20

6

00

14

22

7

00

00

56

5

00

16

49

eqlsgjh

eqlsgjh

eqlsgjh

eqlsgjh

eqlsgjh

815

00

01

32

Fkkuk uacj

Fkkuk uacj

Fkkuk uacj

Fkkuk uacj

Fkkuk uacj-&233

-&233

-&233

-&233

-&233

809

00

09

87

810

00

08

12

806

00

00

20

811

00

00

20

812

00

00

20

805

00

07

84

799

00

05

33

804

00

05

70

803

00

03

72

802

00

02

01

782

00

06

33

783

00

00

40

784

00

00

20

781

00

09

05

780

00

00

40

776

00

07

77

777

00

01

15

775

00

04

45

772

00

04

37

771

00

00

64

770

00

03

38

768

00

03

80

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3835

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

767

00

05

09

766

00

01

85

760

00

04

35

759

00

04

24

748

00

04

19

745

00

01

66

742

00

02

52

741

00

00

20

736

00

07

78

740

00

01

01

737

00

07

82

700

00

07

62

697

00

04

57

696

00

04

69

690

00

02

04

694

00

00

20

695

00

03

96

691

00

04

80

692

00

00

97

687

00

11

71

686

00

00

99

685

00

06

01

675

00

00

20

684

00

04

14

683

00

05

88

682

00

02

13

681

00

01

52

679

00

00

20

680

00

00

20

vuoy

vuoy

vuoy

vuoy

vuoy

1448

00

02

90

Fkkuk uacj

Fkkuk uacj

Fkkuk uacj

Fkkuk uacj

Fkkuk uacj-&199

-&199

-&199

-&199

-&199

1449

00

00

20

1447

00

02

81

1450

00

00

31

1445

00

03

68

1444

00

01

58

1443

00

01

54

1439

00

01

71

1438

00

02

16

1437

00

02

35

1435

00

04

10

1434

00

00

39

1367¼jkLrk½

00

00

75

1430

00

00

20

1431

00

04

03

1432

00

02

14

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3836

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1429

00

01

25

1510¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

01

49

1368

00

00

76

1369

00

09

41

1364

00

09

92

1351

00

02

51

1363

00

00

20

1355

00

00

20

1350

00

06

05

1372

00

00

20

1373

00

02

32

1374

00

00

20

1346

00

00

20

1349

00

04

33

1348

00

03

53

1320

00

00

20

1347

00

01

48

1321

00

02

81

1322

00

02

89

1323

00

00

20

1324

00

01

95

1319

00

01

20

1317

00

00

20

1326

00

00

20

1325

00

02

35

1298

00

04

92

1299

00

02

90

1297

00

00

20

1301

00

02

09

1289

00

02

63

1300

00

00

38

1290

00

05

08

1288

00

03

22

1292

00

00

20

1287

00

01

84

1286

00

00

41

1291

00

06

31

1283

00

03

98

1284

00

02

52

1285

00

00

36

1281

00

07

46

1274

00

01

50

1275

00

03

92

1280

00

00

37

1277

00

00

20

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3837

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

1276

00

11

88

1265

00

03

16

1264

00

00

20

1266

00

04

39

1267

00

06

64

1144

00

00

61

1143

00

02

90

1142

00

00

20

1140

00

00

20

1268¼jkLrk½

00

02

21

ihvkuks

ihvkuks

ihvkuks

ihvkuks

ihvkuks

2091¼jkLrk½

00

02

83

Fkkuk uacj

Fkkuk uacj

Fkkuk uacj

Fkkuk uacj

Fkkuk uacj-&200

-&200

-&200

-&200

-&200

2493

00

10

54

2494

00

00

20

2488

00

02

07

2487

00

00

20

2489

00

08

03

2490

00

03

52

2473

00

00

20

2474

00

00

20

2491

00

13

58

2472

00

01

92

2471¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

02

63

2099

00

38

05

2098

00

01

87

2097

00

00

20

2096

00

00

20

2081

00

04

63

2076

00

07

52

2075

00

00

20

2077

00

08

48

2079

00

00

32

2078

00

07

94

2069

00

00

20

2067

00

05

91

2066

00

04

92

2065

00

05

61

2064

00

00

25

2062

00

00

20

2059

00

00

20

2061

00

06

20

2060

00

00

98

2040

00

00

20

2104

00

02

00

2107

00

00

39

2106

00

03

60

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3838

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2105

00

04

72

2121

00

00

20

2039

00

01

24

2122

00

00

85

2038

00

01

75

2035

00

00

20

2037

00

05

09

2036

00

02

08

1975

00

03

76

1976

00

06

53

1980

00

08

02

1979

00

00

20

1981

00

06

24

1982

00

16

80

1973¼fQYM psuy½

00

01

64

1969

00

00

48

1968

00

00

20

1966

00

07

32

1967

00

07

37

1964

00

00

20

1965

00

05

34

1950

00

01

22

1944

00

03

41

1945

00

00

83

1946

00

00

20

1943

00

11

16

1941

00

00

70

1938

00

00

20

1942

00

07

71

1940

00

00

20

1424¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

03

39

1413

00

00

31

1411

00

00

20

1399

00

08

21

1400

00

02

97

1398

00

00

42

1401

00

03

12

1402

00

10

30

1396@2628

00

00

20

1396

00

00

20

1395¼ukyk½

00

00

97

1394¼ukyk½

00

00

97

1391

00

07

61

1389

00

25

33

1392¼ukyk½

00

01

68

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3839

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

1393¼ukyk½

00

02

00

1438

00

06

85

1441

00

33

92

1442

00

00

20

1489¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

01

54

39

00

09

74

38

00

34

58

36

00

08

20

37¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

01

35

42

00

02

64

41

00

00

20

43

00

09

25

44

00

14

10

21

00

06

00

20¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

01

06

17

00

00

25

18

00

13

83

19

00

00

20

8

00

00

20

9

00

10

64

10 ¼fQYM psuy½

00

01

02

ljh iÎh

ljh iÎh

ljh iÎh

ljh iÎh

ljh iÎh

163@166 ¼fQYM psuy½

00

01

39

Fkkuk uacj

Fkkuk uacj

Fkkuk uacj

Fkkuk uacj

Fkkuk uacj-&152@1

-&152@1

-&152@1

-&152@1

-&152@1

161

00

05

00

162

00

00

20

157

00

17

26

lk/kiqj Nrj

lk/kiqj Nrj

lk/kiqj Nrj

lk/kiqj Nrj

lk/kiqj Nrj

661¼ukyk½

00

01

82

Fkkuk uacj

Fkkuk uacj

Fkkuk uacj

Fkkuk uacj

Fkkuk uacj-&197

-&197

-&197

-&197

-&197

660

00

00

56

587

00

05

46

586

00

03

80

584

00

00

20

588

00

03

21

591

00

00

20

581

00

02

45

582

00

00

20

580

00

14

95

578

00

00

20

529

00

03

62

576

00

00

40

574 ¼ukyk½

00

01

92

523

00

02

60

524

00

00

20

525

00

09

35

526

00

08

05

528 ¼ukyk½

00

01

20

527

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3840

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

531

00

00

20

530

00

05

54

532

00

00

20

533

00

00

20

529

00

04

75

549

00

05

06

548

00

05

53

550

00

01

04

547

00

12

15

546

00

01

09

544

00

00

20

540

00

00

53

539

00

00

20

542

00

04

85

541

00

04

78

463 ¼ukyk½

00

01

27

452

00

00

20

449

00

00

20

451

00

03

84

450

00

05

81

447

00

00

20

446

00

01

12

445

00

05

50

433

00

00

20

444

00

00

20

442

00

01

13

441

00

03

01

434

00

01

08

428

00

00

20

435

00

03

87

436

00

00

94

427

00

00

95

426

00

07

42

425

00

04

03

424

00

00

97

422

00

10

70

421

00

02

34

610@666 ¼dsuky½

00

02

73

418 ¼dsuky½

00

01

43

csyljk

csyljk

csyljk

csyljk

csyljk

2974

00

00

26

Fkkuk uacj

Fkkuk uacj

Fkkuk uacj

Fkkuk uacj

Fkkuk uacj-&152

-&152

-&152

-&152

-&152

2973

00

09

02

2958¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

02

27

2957

00

09

93

2956

00

00

20

2955

00

03

29

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3841

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

1764¼ukyk½

00

01

43

1763

00

10

68

1762

00

12

89

1781

00

03

56

1782

00

01

38

1783

00

00

20

1780

00

06

81

1779

00

00

20

1784

00

04

81

1785

00

03

33

1787

00

01

85

1788

00

00

20

1786

00

01

53

1758

00

00

20

1793

00

07

68

1792

00

01

41

1794

00

03

49

1797

00

03

20

1796

00

10

90

1799¼jkLrk½

00

00

92

1915¼jkLrk½

00

01

59

1737

00

05

46

1738

00

01

35

1739

00

04

65

1692

00

05

06

1690

00

00

20

1691

00

04

27

1684

00

00

20

1689

00

00

20

1687

00

01

56

1688

00

04

19

1693

00

00

20

1655

00

02

82

1654

00

00

20

1694

00

02

58

1696

00

01

05

1695

00

00

40

1636

00

00

84

1697

00

00

89

1699

00

00

21

1700

00

00

20

1633

00

01

22

1635

00

01

27

1634

00

01

09

1632

00

03

91

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3842

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1627

00

00

46

1631

00

03

26

1630

00

01

94

1628

00

01

71

1629

00

00

61

1626

00

02

07

1619

00

00

20

1625

00

00

20

1620

00

06

38

1622

00

00

20

1621

00

01

14

1608

00

00

20

1614

00

00

52

1613

00

00

20

1610

00

06

06

1611

00

05

17

1612¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

02

56

1375

00

09

13

1376

00

12

09

1373

00

01

00

1374

00

04

92

1377

00

00

20

1372

00

00

35

1367

00

01

71

1364

00

00

21

1365

00

04

07

1361

00

02

16

1358

00

03

73

1366

00

00

20

1355

00

02

39

1354

00

01

87

1353

00

00

56

1351

00

04

29

1255

00

05

10

1256

00

04

70

1250

00

01

77

1249

00

01

46

1246

00

03

30

1244

00

01

14

1243

00

01

64

1242

00

01

68

1240

00

05

74

1241

00

00

20

1239

00

02

09

1238

00

00

20

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3843

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

1236

00

05

09

1237

00

00

20

1155

00

03

58

1158

00

02

96

1259

00

00

20

1162

00

02

29

1161

00

00

20

1163

00

02

30

1165

00

00

20

1166

00

02

11

1167

00

02

77

1164

00

00

20

1170

00

09

32

1171

00

00

20

1172

00

00

20

1180

00

01

29

1179

00

00

20

1177

00

03

07

1173

00

00

37

1176

00

01

97

1178

00

00

20

1175

00

02

65

1174

00

05

15

1196¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

00

83

815

00

02

00

814

00

02

13

813

00

01

77

816

00

00

20

817

00

02

40

819

00

02

58

818

00

05

01

840

00

02

23

842

00

02

37

843

00

01

87

844

00

02

67

846

00

03

72

847

00

03

54

849

00

13

73

875

00

05

21

876

00

03

55

896

00

01

24

897

00

01

17

898

00

02

39

901

00

04

56

902

00

02

23

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3844

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

905

00

02

35

906

00

02

86

908

00

00

91

909

00

02

24

911

00

01

46

910

00

05

75

939

00

00

42

940

00

01

51

941

00

01

35

942

00

00

54

944

00

06

81

945

00

03

96

943

00

00

20

952

00

01

80

947

00

02

16

951

00

04

39

954

00

00

20

955

00

00

20

956

00

00

20

972

00

00

20

973

00

00

20

948

00

00

50

949

00

00

44

950

00

06

68

980

00

03

14

981

00

00

20

979

00

02

63

976

00

00

20

977

00

03

56

978

00

03

23

983

00

00

40

1046 ¼jkLrk½

00

00

97

408

00

00

92

407

00

04

21

405

00

00

77

406

00

02

74

403

00

00

20

404

00

00

20

421

00

00

20

422

00

04

52

420

00

00

20

423

00

07

14

425

00

00

20

424

00

00

20

430

00

00

66

426

00

02

31

427

00

03

92

390

00

00

89

389

00

09

62

360

00

00

20

385

00

00

20

386

00

00

20

361

00

00

89

388

00

03

11

387

00

03

17

369

00

03

18

370

00

00

20

366

00

04

27

368

00

01

62

367

00

04

48

365

00

03

30

255

00

00

20

256

00

06

97

257

00

00

20

320

00

00

82

259

00

01

12

266

00

07

25

267

00

00

32

265

00

01

99

268

00

05

86

264

00

00

20

271

00

00

20

269

00

04

61

279

00

00

20

33

00

02

52

20

00

06

86

19

00

02

85

16

00

00

20

21

00

00

20

18

00

03

11

17

00

05

36

14

00

02

85

13

00

01

00

12

00

04

30

22

00

00

20

11

00

08

96

9

00

05

04

10

00

00

20

8

00

00

55

106 ¼dsuky½

00

02

36

¹iQk- la- vkj&25011@20@2013&vksvkj&Iº

iou oqQekj] voj lfpo

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3845

New Delhi, the 27th July, 2013

S.O. 1534.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that a

pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited in Dist. Saran in the State of Bihar for ‘Patna to Motihari and

Baitalpur Pipeline’ for the transportation of Petroleum Product;

And, whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary

to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which is described in the

Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals

Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention

to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on

which the copies of the notification issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of

India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the

pipeline under the land, to Shri Arun Kumar Jha B.A.S. & Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited (Pipelines

Division) P.O. Dhelwan, Sipara, Dist. Patna (Bihar.) Pin-800020.

SCHEDULE

Dist.: Saran

State : Bihar

Mouja / Village

Survey/BlockNo.

Sub-Div.-No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

SAMAHUTA

6407

00

02

50

Thana Number : 234

6406

00

06

99

6405

00

03

36

6404

00

08

34

6410

00

00

20

6397

00

02

69

6412

00

02

27

6413

00

00

20

6402

00

02

88

6401

00

03

83

6403

00

01

08

6400

00

02

80

6432

00

00

20

6431

00

00

20

6433

00

00

14

6399

00

01

76

6434

00

02

52

6392

00

01

23

6440

00

02

59

6441

00

04

68

6439

00

00

58

6442

00

03

87

6443

00

04

80

6444

00

00

80

6447

00

00

20

6445

00

05

23

6446

00

06

24

6451

00

00

62

6553

00

04

90

6552

00

01

92

3846

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3847

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3971

00

00

20

6479

00

00

20

3969

00

37

45

3968

00

00

20

3980

00

05

28

3962

00

00

25

3961

00

02

10

3960

00

00

20

3956

00

00

20

3946

00

01

12

3981

00

03

92

3982

00

00

76

3983

00

00

20

3984

00

00

20

3945

00

09

24

3944

00

01

75

3943

00

12

44

3922

00

00

20

3995

00

00

96

3931

00

01

95

3932

00

00

20

3930

00

02

70

3929

00

03

22

3928

00

02

27

3927

00

02

53

4000

00

00

20

3926

00

08

85

4001

00

08

65

4002

00

00

45

4004

00

00

20

4005

00

15

92

4006 (Road)

00

01

34

4007 (Road)

00

01

31

4008 (Road)

00

02

18

4009

00

06

47

4010

00

02

29

4011

00

14

20

4012

00

05

28

4013

00

15

28

4014

00

02

01

4024

00

11

09

4027

00

27

87

4031

00

01

27

4034

00

04

28

4033

00

03

18

4032

00

03

74

3859

00

05

05

3851

00

22

57

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3848

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

3852

00

02

77

3853

00

02

10

3850

00

00

20

3823

00

04

80

3854

00

00

20

3830

00

00

20

3822

00

06

06

3824

00

00

56

3749

00

03

79

3748

00

04

48

3750

00

01

74

3745

00

00

20

3751

00

06

95

3752

00

00

20

3753

00

00

20

3744

00

00

20

3743

00

03

44

3754

00

09

82

3755

00

03

35

3756

00

02

86

3757

00

03

41

3740

00

00

20

3760

00

04

73

3759

00

00

20

3761

00

07

32

4143

00

00

20

3762

00

09

58

4142

00

01

69

4141

00

01

65

4139

00

01

01

4140

00

07

84

4138

00

01

07

4159

00

11

39

4157

00

00

20

4160

00

00

66

4158

00

02

27

4186

00

12

75

4184

00

00

20

4184

00

01

59

4185

00

06

76

4187

00

02

81

4188

00

08

23

4189

00

08

86

4190

00

01

79

4191

00

00

20

4214 (Road)

00

04

15

4256

00

05

00

4222

00

00

36

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3849

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4223

00

07

54

4228

00

01

88

4229

00

00

20

4227

00

04

86

4226

00

00

20

4230

00

06

26

4231

00

00

20

4233

00

06

65

4235

00

03

95

4238

00

00

20

4236

00

03

54

4237

00

05

61

5791

00

01

56

4240

00

00

66

5790

00

06

74

5789/7184

00

00

20

5789

00

06

99

5788/7182

00

00

79

5788

00

06

92

5786

00

00

20

5787

00

02

00

KOPA

767

00

13

75

Thana Number:231

763

00

00

20

766

00

05

90

764

00

01

46

765

00

04

33

760

00

02

32

583

00

00

66

584

00

09

60

585

00

02

86

586

00

00

20

580

00

06

06

579

00

00

42

590

00

00

20

591

00

08

18

578

00

03

72

592

00

06

23

564

00

02

04

563

00

08

29

593

00

00

20

562

00

01

01

559

00

02

29

560

00

04

88

558

00

06

18

557

00

00

84

556

00

10

55

533

00

00

20

555

00

01

53

3196—M-8

Mss. 443 to 480

3849

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3850

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

545

00

00

20

534

00

04

45

542

00

02

67

535

00

00

84

541

00

05

24

540

00

03

90

397

00

05

67

396

00

00

27

321

00

00

20

322

00

00

20

317

00

00

63

316

00

00

73

315

00

00

91

313

00

05

81

283(Road)

00

00

87

254

00

04

19

253

00

06

93

252

00

04

34

251

00

00

11

250

00

00

47

249

00

01

62

248

00

02

08

247

00

05

61

246

00

00

73

181

00

04

91

185

00

06

01

182

00

00

20

183

00

00

20

184

00

02

63

173

00

00

20

171

00

00

20

172

00

06

89

168

00

00

74

170

00

04

70

169

00

01

30

156

00

15

24

155

00

00

20

157

00

03

92

159

00

00

93

158

00

04

05

110

00

02

95

111

00

02

57

127

00

00

20

112

00

05

26

113

00

04

22

114

00

07

24

115

00

00

51

116

00

01

77

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3851

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

117

00

00

20

12

00

16

72

120

00

00

20

119

00

00

20

6

00

14

22

7

00

00

56

5

00

16

49

MUSEHRI

815

00

01

32

Thana Number : 233

809

00

09

87

810

00

08

12

806

00

00

20

811

00

00

20

812

00

00

20

805

00

07

84

799

00

05

33

804

00

05

70

803

00

03

72

802

00

02

01

782

00

06

33

783

00

00

40

784

00

00

20

781

00

09

05

780

00

00

40

776

00

07

77

777

00

01

15

775

00

04

45

772

00

04

37

771

00

00

64

770

00

03

38

768

00

03

80

767

00

05

09

766

00

01

85

760

00

04

35

759

00

04

24

748

00

04

19

745

00

01

66

742

00

02

52

741

00

00

20

736

00

07

78

740

00

01

01

737

00

07

82

700

00

07

62

697

00

04

57

696

00

04

69

690

00

02

04

694

00

00

20

695

00

03

96

691

00

04

80

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3852

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

692

00

00

97

687

00

11

71

686

00

00

99

685

00

06

01

675

00

00

20

684

00

04

14

683

00

05

88

682

00

02

13

681

00

01

52

679

00

00

20

680

00

00

20

ANWAL

1448

00

02

90

Thana Number : 199

1449

00

00

20

1447

00

02

81

1450

00

00

31

1445

00

03

68

1444

00

01

58

1443

00

01

54

1439

00

01

71

1438

00

02

16

1437

00

02

35

1435

00

04

10

1434

00

00

39

1367(Road)

00

00

75

1430

00

00

20

1431

00

04

03

1432

00

02

14

1429

00

01

25

1510(Cart Track)

00

01

49

1368

00

00

76

1369

00

09

41

1364

00

09

92

1351

00

02

51

1363

00

00

20

1355

00

00

20

1350

00

06

05

1372

00

00

20

1373

00

02

32

1374

00

00

20

1346

00

00

20

1349

00

04

33

1348

00

03

53

1320

00

00

20

1347

00

01

48

1321

00

02

81

1322

00

02

89

1323

00

00

20

1324

00

01

95

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3853

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

1319

00

01

20

1317

00

00

20

1326

00

00

20

1325

00

02

35

1298

00

04

92

1299

00

02

90

1297

00

00

20

1301

00

02

09

1289

00

02

63

1300

00

00

38

1290

00

05

08

1288

00

03

22

1292

00

00

20

1287

00

01

84

1286

00

00

41

1291

00

06

31

1283

00

03

98

1284

00

02

52

1285

00

00

36

1281

00

07

46

1274

00

01

50

1275

00

03

92

1280

00

00

37

1277

00

00

20

1276

00

11

88

1265

00

03

16

1264

00

00

20

1266

00

04

39

1267

00

06

64

1144

00

00

61

1143

00

02

90

1142

00

00

20

1140

00

00

20

1268(Road)

00

02

21

PIANO

2091(Road)

00

02

83

Thana Number : 200

2493

00

10

54

2494

00

00

20

2488

00

02

07

2487

00

00

20

2489

00

08

03

2490

00

03

52

2473

00

00

20

2474

00

00

20

2491

00

13

58

2472

00

01

92

2471(Cart Track)

00

02

63

2099

00

38

05

2098

00

01

87

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3854

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2097

00

00

20

2096

00

00

20

2081

00

04

63

2076

00

07

52

2075

00

00

20

2077

00

08

48

2079

00

00

32

2078

00

07

94

2069

00

00

20

2067

00

05

91

2066

00

04

92

2065

00

05

61

2064

00

00

25

2062

00

00

20

2059

00

00

20

2061

00

06

20

2060

00

00

98

2040

00

00

20

2104

00

02

00

2107

00

00

39

2106

00

03

60

2105

00

04

72

2121

00

00

20

2039

00

01

24

2122

00

00

85

2038

00

01

75

2035

00

00

20

2037

00

05

09

2036

00

02

08

1975

00

03

76

1976

00

06

53

1980

00

08

02

1979

00

00

20

1981

00

06

24

1982

00

16

80

1973(Field Channel)

00

01

64

1969

00

00

48

1968

00

00

20

1966

00

07

32

1967

00

07

37

1964

00

00

20

1965

00

05

34

1950

00

01

22

1944

00

03

41

1945

00

00

83

1946

00

00

20

1943

00

11

16

1941

00

00

70

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3855

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

1938

00

00

20

1942

00

07

71

1940

00

00

20

1424(Cart Track)

00

03

39

1413

00

00

31

1411

00

00

20

1399

00

08

21

1400

00

02

97

1398

00

00

42

1401

00

03

12

1402

00

10

30

1396/2628

00

00

20

1396

00

00

20

1395(Nala)

00

00

97

1394(Nala)

00

00

97

1391

00

07

61

1389

00

25

33

1392(Nala)

00

01

68

1393(Nala)

00

02

00

1438

00

06

85

1441

00

33

92

1442

00

00

20

1489(Cart Track)

00

01

54

39

00

09

74

38

00

34

58

36

00

08

20

37(Cart Track)

00

01

35

42

00

02

64

41

00

00

20

43

00

09

25

44

00

14

10

21

00

06

00

20(Cart Track)

00

01

06

17

00

00

25

18

00

13

83

19

00

00

20

8

00

00

20

9

00

10

64

10(Field Channel)

00

01

02

SAREA PATTI Thana No : 152/1

163/166 (Field Channel)

00

01

39

161

00

05

00

162

00

00

20

157

00

17

26

SADHPURCHHATAR Thana Number : 197 661(Nala)

00

01

82

660

00

00

56

587

00

05

46

586

00

03

80

584

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3856

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

588

00

03

21

591

00

00

20

581

00

02

45

582

00

00

20

580

00

14

95

578

00

00

20

529

00

03

62

576

00

00

40

574(Nala)

00

01

92

523

00

02

60

524

00

00

20

525

00

09

35

526

00

08

05

528(Nala)

00

01

20

527

00

00

20

531

00

00

20

530

00

05

54

532

00

00

20

533

00

00

20

529

00

04

75

549

00

05

06

548

00

05

53

550

00

01

04

547

00

12

15

546

00

01

09

544

00

00

20

540

00

00

53

539

00

00

20

542

00

04

85

541

00

04

78

463(Nala)

00

01

27

452

00

00

20

449

00

00

20

451

00

03

84

450

00

05

81

447

00

00

20

446

00

01

12

445

00

05

50

433

00

00

20

444

00

00

20

442

00

01

13

441

00

03

01

434

00

01

08

428

00

00

20

435

00

03

87

436

00

00

94

427

00

00

95

426

00

07

42

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3857

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

425

00

04

03

424

00

00

97

422

00

10

70

421

00

02

34

610/666(canal)

00

02

73

418(canal)

00

01

43

BELSARA

2974

00

00

26

Thana Number:152

2973

00

09

02

2958(Cart Track)

00

02

27

2957

00

09

93

2956

00

00

20

2955

00

03

29

1764(Nala)

00

01

43

1763

00

10

68

1762

00

12

89

1781

00

03

56

1782

00

01

38

1783

00

00

20

1780

00

06

81

1779

00

00

20

1784

00

04

81

1785

00

03

33

1787

00

01

85

1788

00

00

20

1786

00

01

53

1758

00

00

20

1793

00

07

68

1792

00

01

41

1794

00

03

49

1797

00

03

20

1796

00

10

90

1799(Road)

00

00

92

1915(Road)

00

01

59

1737

00

05

46

1738

00

01

35

1739

00

04

65

1692

00

05

06

1690

00

00

20

1691

00

04

27

1684

00

00

20

1689

00

00

20

1687

00

01

56

1688

00

04

19

1693

00

00

20

1655

00

02

82

1654

00

00

20

1694

00

02

58

1696

00

01

05

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3858

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1695

00

00

40

1636

00

00

84

1697

00

00

89

1699

00

00

21

1700

00

00

20

1633

00

01

22

1635

00

01

27

1634

00

01

09

1632

00

03

91

1627

00

00

46

1631

00

03

26

1630

00

01

94

1628

00

01

71

1629

00

00

61

1626

00

02

07

1619

00

00

20

1625

00

00

20

1620

00

06

38

1622

00

00

20

1621

00

01

14

1608

00

00

20

1614

00

00

52

1613

00

00

20

1610

00

06

06

1611

00

05

17

1612(Cart Track)

00

02

56

1375

00

09

13

1376

00

12

09

1373

00

01

00

1374

00

04

92

1377

00

00

20

1372

00

00

35

1367

00

01

71

1364

00

00

21

1365

00

04

07

1361

00

02

16

1358

00

03

73

1366

00

00

20

1355

00

02

39

1354

00

01

87

1353

00

00

56

1351

00

04

29

1255

00

05

10

1256

00

04

70

1250

00

01

77

1249

00

01

46

1246

00

03

30

1244

00

01

14

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3859

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

1243

00

01

64

1242

00

01

68

1240

00

05

74

1241

00

00

20

1239

00

02

09

1238

00

00

20

1236

00

05

09

1237

00

00

20

1155

00

03

58

1158

00

02

96

1259

00

00

20

1162

00

02

29

1161

00

00

20

1163

00

02

30

1165

00

00

20

1166

00

02

11

1167

00

02

77

1164

00

00

20

1170

00

09

32

1171

00

00

20

1172

00

00

20

1180

00

01

29

1179

00

00

20

1177

00

03

07

1173

00

00

37

1176

00

01

97

1178

00

00

20

1175

00

02

65

1174

00

05

15

1196(Cart Track)

00

00

83

815

00

02

00

814

00

02

13

813

00

01

77

816

00

00

20

817

00

02

40

819

00

02

58

818

00

05

01

840

00

02

23

842

00

02

37

843

00

01

87

844

00

02

67

846

00

03

72

847

00

03

54

849

00

13

73

875

00

05

21

876

00

03

55

896

00

01

24

897

00

01

17

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3860

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

898

00

02

39

901

00

04

56

902

00

02

23

905

00

02

35

906

00

02

86

908

00

00

91

909

00

02

24

911

00

01

46

910

00

05

75

939

00

00

42

940

00

01

51

941

00

01

35

942

00

00

54

944

00

06

81

945

00

03

96

943

00

00

20

952

00

01

80

947

00

02

16

951

00

04

39

954

00

00

20

955

00

00

20

956

00

00

20

972

00

00

20

973

00

00

20

948

00

00

50

949

00

00

44

950

00

06

68

980

00

03

14

981

00

00

20

979

00

02

63

976

00

00

20

977

00

03

56

978

00

03

23

983

00

00

40

1046(Road)

00

00

97

408

00

00

92

407

00

04

21

405

00

00

77

406

00

02

74

403

00

00

20

404

00

00

20

421

00

00

20

422

00

04

52

420

00

00

20

423

00

07

14

425

00

00

20

424

00

00

20

430

00

00

66

426

00

02

31

427

00

03

92

390

00

00

89

389

00

09

62

360

00

00

20

385

00

00

20

386

00

00

20

361

00

00

89

388

00

03

11

387

00

03

17

369

00

03

18

370

00

00

20

366

00

04

27

368

00

01

62

367

00

04

48

365

00

03

30

255

00

00

20

256

00

06

97

257

00

00

20

320

00

00

82

259

00

01

12

266

00

07

25

267

00

00

32

265

00

01

99

268

00

05

86

264

00

00

20

271

00

00

20

269

00

04

61

279

00

00

20

33

00

02

52

20

00

06

86

19

00

02

85

16

00

00

20

21

00

00

20

18

00

03

11

17

00

05

36

14

00

02

85

13

00

01

00

12

00

04

30

22

00

00

20

11

00

08

96

9

00

05

04

10

00

00

20

8

00

00

55

106(Canal)

00

02

36

[F. No. R-25011/20/ 2013-OR-I]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3861

ubZ fnYyh] 27 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk-

dk-vk-

dk-vk-

dk-vk-

dk-vk- 1535-—dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slk izrhr gksrk gS fd yksd fgr esa ;g vko”;d gS fd iVuk ls eksfrgkjh vkSj

csrkyiqj rd isVªksfy;e inkFkksZ ds ifjogu gsrq ftyk floku] jkT; fcgkj esa bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs”ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbiykbu fcNkbZ

tkuh pkfg,(

vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slh ikbiykbu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, vko”;d izrhr gksrk gS fd ml Hkwfe esa ftlds Hkhrj

mDr ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkus dk izLrko gS vkSj tks bl vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa of.kZr gS] mi;ksx dk vtZu fd;k tk,(

vr% vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbUl ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½ vf/kfu;e] 1962 ¼1962

dk 50½ dh /kkjk 3 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk iznÙk “kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] mDr Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/akdkj dk vtZu djus ds

vius vk”k; dh ?kks’k.kk djrh gS A

dksbZ O;fDr] tks mDr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa fgrc) gS] ml rkjh[k ls ftldks] Hkkjr ds jkti= esa ;Fkk izdkf”kr bl

vf/klwpuk dh izfr;ka lk/kkj.k turk dks miyC/k djk nh tkrh gS] bDdhl fnu ds vUnj] Hkwfe ds Hkhrj ikbiykbu fcNk, tkus gsrq

mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj ds vtZu ds fy,] Jh v:.k dqekj >k] fc-iz-ls- o l{ke izkf/kdkjh bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs”ku fyfeVsM ¼ikbiykbu

fMohtu½ iVuk] iks-vks- <syok] flikjk] ftyk iVuk] fiu% 800020] fcgkj dks fyf[kr :i eas vk{ksi Hkst ldsxkA

vuqlwph

ftyk % floku

jkT; % fcgkj

ekStk@xzke

losZ@Cykd@la- (IykWV la-)

lc&Mho&la-

{ks=kiQy

gsDVs;j

vkjs

oxZ ehVj

1

2

3

4

5

6

tykyiwj

tykyiwj

tykyiwj

tykyiwj

tykyiwj

2232&ukyk

2232&ukyk

2232&ukyk

2232&ukyk

2232&ukyk

00

00

00

00

00

10

10

10

10

10

72

72

72

72

72

Fkkuk uacj&236

Fkkuk uacj&236

Fkkuk uacj&236

Fkkuk uacj&236

Fkkuk uacj&236

2233&ukyk

2233&ukyk

2233&ukyk

2233&ukyk

2233&ukyk

00

00

00

00

00

01

01

01

01

01

08

08

08

08

08

2238

00

01

65

2239

00

13

27

2240

00

00

20

2242

00

05

00

2247

00

04

91

2248

00

03

49

2258

00

10

30

2257

00

12

90

2256

00

01

43

2300

00

12

27

2299

00

09

48

2304

00

06

08

2305

00

03

99

2306

00

00

20

2307

00

01

10

2308

00

02

37

2309

00

03

25

2314

00

01

14

2315

00

10

68

2316

00

06

12

2233&ukyk

2233&ukyk

2233&ukyk

2233&ukyk

2233&ukyk

00

00

00

00

00

01

01

01

01

01

46

46

46

46

46

2226&ukyk

2226&ukyk

2226&ukyk

2226&ukyk

2226&ukyk

00

00

00

00

00

03

03

03

03

03

80

80

80

80

80

3862

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3863

2225&ukyk

2225&ukyk

2225&ukyk

2225&ukyk

2225&ukyk

00

00

00

00

00

07

07

07

07

07

35

35

35

35

35

1075¼dsuky½

1075¼dsuky½

1075¼dsuky½

1075¼dsuky½

1075¼dsuky½

00

00

00

00

00

01

01

01

01

01

78

78

78

78

78

1074¼dsuky½

1074¼dsuky½

1074¼dsuky½

1074¼dsuky½

1074¼dsuky½

00

00

00

00

00

01

01

01

01

01

16

16

16

16

16

1073¼dsuky½

1073¼dsuky½

1073¼dsuky½

1073¼dsuky½

1073¼dsuky½

00

00

00

00

00

02

02

02

02

02

38

38

38

38

38

988

00

00

20

987

00

02

30

986

00

06

94

986@9306

00

05

11

815

00

00

20

814

00

00

20

985

00

04

57

817

00

02

44

818

00

04

10

822

00

07

85

820

00

00

20

821

00

00

20

836

00

00

20

833@9307

00

06

69

833

00

04

03

834

00

10

18

775

00

00

20

777

00

05

89

786

00

05

18

787

00

00

20

778

00

02

35

779

00

03

87

785

00

04

48

784

00

01

60

735

00

00

20

780

00

00

26

781

00

03

07

782

00

01

49

783

00

00

20

738

00

01

63

739

00

00

20

737

00

07

25

744

00

02

19

745

00

00

20

743

00

00

75

748

00

09

69

749

00

00

95

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3864

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

429¼jkLrk½

429¼jkLrk½

429¼jkLrk½

429¼jkLrk½

429¼jkLrk½

00

00

00

00

00

01

01

01

01

01

18

18

18

18

18

311

00

13

18

310

00

00

20

313

00

02

39

328

00

05

21

324

00

04

87

325

00

02

08

327

00

00

20

273

00

07

93

274

00

00

20

326

00

00

35

267

00

00

20

269

00

08

14

268

00

05

04

259

00

00

20

251

00

01

19

252

00

01

76

253

00

01

97

256

00

00

76

254

00

02

58

255

00

09

28

239

00

00

20

244

00

00

20

243

00

00

78

245

00

00

20

242

00

02

86

241

00

03

54

236

00

01

60

3457

00

02

00

235

00

00

34

233

00

00

20

234

00

00

20

3458

00

10

47

enkjhpd

enkjhpd

enkjhpd

enkjhpd

enkjhpd

919&ukyk

919&ukyk

919&ukyk

919&ukyk

919&ukyk

00

00

00

00

00

02

02

02

02

02

80

80

80

80

80

Fkkuk uacj&235

Fkkuk uacj&235

Fkkuk uacj&235

Fkkuk uacj&235

Fkkuk uacj&235

920&ukyk

920&ukyk

920&ukyk

920&ukyk

920&ukyk

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

20

20

20

20

20

918&ukyk

918&ukyk

918&ukyk

918&ukyk

918&ukyk

00

00

00

00

00

05

05

05

05

05

09

09

09

09

09

906&ukyk

906&ukyk

906&ukyk

906&ukyk

906&ukyk

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

88

88

88

88

88

917

00

00

71

907

00

03

08

908

00

04

73

911

00

00

31

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3865

904

00

00

51

909

00

01

54

903

00

06

49

900

00

03

83

902

00

00

20

901

00

00

20

899

00

04

20

898

00

00

20

895

00

06

34

882

00

01

28

881

00

01

08

880

00

02

40

874

00

09

91

869&jkLrk

869&jkLrk

869&jkLrk

869&jkLrk

869&jkLrk

00

00

00

00

00

01

01

01

01

01

11

11

11

11

11

750&jkLrk

750&jkLrk

750&jkLrk

750&jkLrk

750&jkLrk

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

20

20

20

20

20

748

00

00

20

875

00

00

20

810

00

00

20

751

00

04

31

803

00

01

27

802

00

01

08

801

00

00

20

804

00

00

89

805

00

04

29

806

00

04

31

797&ukyk

797&ukyk

797&ukyk

797&ukyk

797&ukyk

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

40

40

40

40

40

791

00

00

20

807

00

00

89

808&ukyk

808&ukyk

808&ukyk

808&ukyk

808&ukyk

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

20

20

20

20

20

795&ukyk

795&ukyk

795&ukyk

795&ukyk

795&ukyk

00

00

00

00

00

01

01

01

01

01

09

09

09

09

09

796&ukyk

796&ukyk

796&ukyk

796&ukyk

796&ukyk

00

00

00

00

00

01

01

01

01

01

04

04

04

04

04

792

00

00

20

793

00

00

66

794&ukyk

794&ukyk

794&ukyk

794&ukyk

794&ukyk

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

20

20

20

20

20

779

00

02

62

778

00

02

31

777

00

02

30

774

00

05

87

775

00

00

35

773@1191

00

00

20

773

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3866

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

772

00

00

20

cxkSjk

cxkSjk

cxkSjk

cxkSjk

cxkSjk

5674

00

06

41

Fkkuk uacj&234

Fkkuk uacj&234

Fkkuk uacj&234

Fkkuk uacj&234

Fkkuk uacj&234

5675

00

05

80

5676

00

00

80

5677

00

03

09

5680

00

05

82

5681

00

02

01

5682

00

03

01

5717

00

04

82

5715

00

06

42

5714

00

02

13

5691

00

01

78

5692

00

00

93

5693

00

02

68

5694

00

02

83

5695

00

02

31

5696

00

02

36

5699

00

02

22

5700

00

01

80

5701

00

04

95

1472

00

02

29

1471

00

00

76

1470

00

02

19

1405

00

05

53

1404

00

08

68

1407

00

01

86

1409

00

04

62

1408

00

00

20

1413

00

02

45

1414

00

03

70

1417

00

01

96

1419

00

02

19

1420

00

08

35

1385

00

00

20

1124

00

14

70

1115

00

00

36

1116

00

15

55

721

00

05

63

720

00

05

51

719

00

05

94

718

00

04

14

634

00

02

44

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3867

656

00

00

20

657

00

10

50

633

00

00

20

649

00

01

72

648

00

20

71

640

00

05

72

639

00

00

20

641

00

01

65

642

00

01

01

643

00

03

79

106

00

07

38

107

00

00

20

108

00

00

20

105

00

00

46

104

00

03

19

109

00

04

06

103

00

05

17

110

00

02

85

111 jkLrk

jkLrk

jkLrk

jkLrk

jkLrk

00

01

42

112

00

00

48

145

00

05

12

113

00

04

12

143

00

08

85

142

00

06

27

140

00

00

20

141

00

05

11

139

00

07

13

134

00

00

20

138

00

06

18

deljk

deljk

deljk

deljk

deljk

1387

00

02

56

Fkkuk uacj&232

Fkkuk uacj&232

Fkkuk uacj&232

Fkkuk uacj&232

Fkkuk uacj&232

1386

00

00

79

1400

00

04

08

1399

00

08

75

1401

00

05

94

1402

00

09

03

1398&dPpk jkLrk

1398&dPpk jkLrk

1398&dPpk jkLrk

1398&dPpk jkLrk

1398&dPpk jkLrk

00

00

00

00

00

01

01

01

01

01

67

67

67

67

67

1394

00

00

20

1395

00

00

20

1403

00

21

08

1404

00

00

72

1127

00

00

90

35 ¼vsu-vsp-&85½

35 ¼vsu-vsp-&85½

35 ¼vsu-vsp-&85½

35 ¼vsu-vsp-&85½

35 ¼vsu-vsp-&85½

00

00

00

00

00

04

04

04

04

04

41

41

41

41

41

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3868

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

741

00

01

17

1407

00

00

44

740

00

01

94

731

00

00

20

739

00

03

91

738

00

01

22

1403

00

02

12

1398

00

01

41

1394

00

11

53

1393

00

05

22

1392

00

01

19

1376

00

08

16

1377

00

02

12

1375

00

07

45

1374

00

00

73

1372

00

07

13

1371

00

04

10

1370

00

04

10

1369

00

04

58

1132

00

00

20

1368

00

00

42

1365

00

08

37

1364

00

06

14

1133

00

00

10

1134

00

00

80

1363

00

03

43

1136

00

03

69

1135

00

00

20

1137

00

04

85

1138

00

00

20

1150&jkLrk

1150&jkLrk

1150&jkLrk

1150&jkLrk

1150&jkLrk

00

00

00

00

00

01

01

01

01

01

34

34

34

34

34

1153

00

02

85

1152

00

02

15

1337

00

34

03

1158

00

00

20

1331

00

21

26

1330

00

06

55

1328

00

00

92

1327

00

00

20

739

00

00

70

738

00

04

91

737

00

02

48

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3869

736

00

00

20

733

00

00

77

734

00

07

89

735

00

06

07

732

00

00

20

274&jsyos

274&jsyos

274&jsyos

274&jsyos

274&jsyos

00

00

00

00

00

09

09

09

09

09

85

85

85

85

85

722

00

14

80

721

00

22

14

720

00

00

11

691

00

01

55

690 ¼jkLrk½

690 ¼jkLrk½

690 ¼jkLrk½

690 ¼jkLrk½

690 ¼jkLrk½

00

00

00

00

00

01

01

01

01

01

23

23

23

23

23

689 ¼ukyk½

689 ¼ukyk½

689 ¼ukyk½

689 ¼ukyk½

689 ¼ukyk½

00

00

00

00

00

02

02

02

02

02

35

35

35

35

35

cyqgh

cyqgh

cyqgh

cyqgh

cyqgh

296

00

02

06

Fkkuk uacj&233

Fkkuk uacj&233

Fkkuk uacj&233

Fkkuk uacj&233

Fkkuk uacj&233

207

00

07

28

207@322

00

09

01

206

00

02

77

205

00

02

75

204

00

01

99

208 ¼ugj½

208 ¼ugj½

208 ¼ugj½

208 ¼ugj½

208 ¼ugj½

00

00

00

00

00

01

01

01

01

01

26

26

26

26

26

203

00

00

20

319

00

12

24

320

00

00

20

317

00

00

29

316

00

08

75

199

00

04

30

198

00

00

45

108 ¼ugj½

108 ¼ugj½

108 ¼ugj½

108 ¼ugj½

108 ¼ugj½

00

00

00

00

00

01

01

01

01

01

74

74

74

74

74

150

00

04

09

149

00

03

74

154

00

07

49

156

00

07

11

155

00

00

62

157

00

08

02

111

00

10

66

110

00

03

96

112

00

00

20

109

00

14

12

103¼dPpk jkLrk½

103¼dPpk jkLrk½

103¼dPpk jkLrk½

103¼dPpk jkLrk½

103¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

00

00

00

00

02

02

02

02

02

52

52

52

52

52

102

00

05

70

101

00

03

64

100@299

00

03

60

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3870

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

87

00

12

03

96

00

07

02

309

00

05

58

305

00

00

57

94

00

00

20

95

00

12

61

304

00

00

20

94@326

00

13

74

93

00

10

31

1¼ugj½

1¼ugj½

1¼ugj½

1¼ugj½

1¼ugj½

00

00

00

00

00

01

01

01

01

01

38

38

38

38

38

ckyMhg

ckyMhg

ckyMhg

ckyMhg

ckyMhg

76

00

08

18

Fkkuk uacj&183

Fkkuk uacj&183

Fkkuk uacj&183

Fkkuk uacj&183

Fkkuk uacj&183

77

00

00

20

75

00

00

20

78

00

00

20

79

00

02

08

80

00

00

20

90

00

09

66

91

00

00

46

74¼dPpk jkLrk½

74¼dPpk jkLrk½

74¼dPpk jkLrk½

74¼dPpk jkLrk½

74¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

00

00

00

00

01

01

01

01

01

29

29

29

29

29

56

00

02

82

55

00

08

97

54

00

00

20

53

00

00

73

51

00

00

20

97

00

09

42

96

00

03

23

95

00

01

38

94

00

00

20

98

00

06

69

99

00

04

22

101

00

00

20

100

00

07

38

102

00

00

22

103

00

11

25

jkuhckjh

jkuhckjh

jkuhckjh

jkuhckjh

jkuhckjh

339

00

00

91

Fkkuk uacj&182

Fkkuk uacj&182

Fkkuk uacj&182

Fkkuk uacj&182

Fkkuk uacj&182

355

00

17

74

347

00

00

20

346

00

00

20

348

00

05

23

349

00

09

61

351

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3871

350

00

05

28

301

00

00

20

352

00

03

91

353

00

00

20

290

00

00

20

289

00

03

66

288

00

10

92

287

00

06

61

264

00

00

20

266

00

05

99

271

00

04

08

282

00

00

20

270

00

00

20

273

00

02

42

272

00

07

42

223

00

00

20

275

00

01

07

274

00

04

01

222

00

00

20

221

00

02

55

220

00

06

37

cSnkiqj

cSnkiqj

cSnkiqj

cSnkiqj

cSnkiqj

588

00

00

52

Fkkuk uacj&184

Fkkuk uacj&184

Fkkuk uacj&184

Fkkuk uacj&184

Fkkuk uacj&184

585

00

00

20

589

00

14

44

593

00

00

20

590

00

08

49

591

00

04

82

592

00

04

07

602

00

02

48

603

00

00

90

604

00

00

20

605

00

00

20

965¼jkLrk½

965¼jkLrk½

965¼jkLrk½

965¼jkLrk½

965¼jkLrk½

00

00

00

00

00

03

03

03

03

03

77

77

77

77

77

966

00

00

20

964

00

06

31

963

00

15

05

956

00

00

20

962

00

07

08

959

00

00

20

961

00

05

98

960

00

01

11

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3872

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

819

00

05

45

820

00

02

51

821

00

02

31

823

00

01

73

824

00

01

86

825

00

02

08

828

00

01

33

831

00

01

14

832

00

01

04

827

00

01

44

835

00

01

39

836

00

02

44

837

00

03

45

838

00

04

95

839

00

01

10

840

00

00

93

841

00

01

05

fc'kwuiqjk

fc'kwuiqjk

fc'kwuiqjk

fc'kwuiqjk

fc'kwuiqjk

1538

00

01

85

Fkkuk uacj&165

Fkkuk uacj&165

Fkkuk uacj&165

Fkkuk uacj&165

Fkkuk uacj&165

1537

00

00

20

1536

00

00

20

1535

00

00

20

1534

00

00

20

1539

00

02

07

1540

00

02

15

1541

00

03

83

1542

00

03

22

1547

00

00

20

1543

00

10

58

1546

00

03

00

1532

00

00

90

1544

00

02

24

1545

00

00

20

1640¼jkLrk½

1640¼jkLrk½

1640¼jkLrk½

1640¼jkLrk½

1640¼jkLrk½

00

00

00

00

00

02

02

02

02

02

19

19

19

19

19

758

00

06

85

764

00

02

94

759

00

03

56

760

00

01

84

761

00

03

59

762

00

00

20

719

00

07

06

748

00

01

18

720

00

01

10

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3873

718

00

00

51

721

00

01

26

722

00

07

15

730

00

00

95

729

00

00

20

731

00

03

94

732

00

00

41

735

00

02

26

735

00

02

00

736

00

03

35

740

00

00

20

739

00

00

20

656

00

00

20

738

00

08

20

688

00

04

14

687

00

03

61

686

00

02

83

685

00

02

97

661

00

04

89

662

00

03

27

666

00

03

26

667

00

02

67

641

00

02

27

639

00

02

32

640

00

02

25

275

00

02

40

434

00

04

17

433

00

01

00

432

00

02

95

431

00

01

51

430

00

00

83

429

00

02

64

428

00

02

74

427

00

05

35

424

00

01

29

289

00

00

20

425

00

03

03

426

00

00

20

422

00

00

20

423

00

10

14

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3874

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

283

00

00

20

403

00

01

05

402

00

05

14

399@1641

00

06

37

398

00

01

09

397

00

02

16

385

00

02

43

386

00

02

77

387

00

00

35

307¼jkLrk½

307¼jkLrk½

307¼jkLrk½

307¼jkLrk½

307¼jkLrk½

00

00

00

00

00

01

01

01

01

01

13

13

13

13

13

374

00

00

20

372

00

00

20

378

00

01

27

379

00

04

08

380

00

03

91

381

00

01

02

382

00

00

20

373

00

09

16

369

00

09

64

368

00

04

39

367

00

02

46

366

00

02

78

365

00

04

61

364

00

08

47

363

00

02

47

336

00

05

74

362

00

05

87

337

00

03

62

361

00

01

22

359

00

03

27

358

00

00

20

356

00

00

20

351

00

00

20

360

00

01

17

355

00

02

39

352

00

02

22

350

00

10

88

349

00

01

61

#dqUnhiwj

#dqUnhiwj

#dqUnhiwj

#dqUnhiwj

#dqUnhiwj

1635&jkLrk

1635&jkLrk

1635&jkLrk

1635&jkLrk

1635&jkLrk

00

00

00

00

00

01

01

01

01

01

60

60

60

60

60

Fkkuk uacj&168

Fkkuk uacj&168

Fkkuk uacj&168

Fkkuk uacj&168

Fkkuk uacj&168

1634

00

02

53

1630

00

00

64

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3875

1629

00

02

34

1636

00

00

20

1628

00

02

85

1627

00

01

48

1637

00

00

40

1625

00

03

73

1626

00

01

09

1621

00

00

20

1622

00

06

60

1619

00

02

97

1615

00

00

20

1616

00

03

09

1613

00

03

50

1611

00

03

65

1609

00

02

80

1588

00

02

55

1589

00

02

58

1594

00

00

20

1593

00

01

45

1596

00

00

20

1592

00

00

20

1595

00

01

65

1599

00

01

76

1598

00

00

35

1575

00

02

22

1572

00

03

06

1571

00

04

71

1569

00

00

43

1508

00

00

20

1570

00

02

00

1567

00

03

35

1566

00

01

67

1565

00

01

13

1564

00

00

63

1512

00

00

20

1513

00

03

97

1561

00

00

20

1562

00

00

20

1514

00

03

78

1515

00

03

39

1534

00

05

63

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3876

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1516

00

02

02

1517

00

04

00

1518

00

00

82

1519

00

04

92

1520

00

00

26

1526

00

04

08

1528

00

01

66

1625

00

04

47

1637

00

00

48

1527

00

05

74

1409

00

08

88

1445

00

00

69

1446

00

00

20

1444

00

00

20

1410

00

04

67

1412

00

03

26

1411

00

00

71

1413

00

05

31

1414

00

01

73

1254

00

03

96

1230

00

00

20

1255

00

00

80

1257

00

00

20

1258

00

00

20

1253

00

00

45

1249

00

01

91

1248

00

02

14

1247

00

02

61

1246

00

03

32

1245

00

04

31

1244

00

00

20

1242

00

08

30

1243

00

04

37

1220&dsuky

1220&dsuky

1220&dsuky

1220&dsuky

1220&dsuky

00

00

00

00

00

03

03

03

03

03

17

17

17

17

17

1211

00

00

20

1209

00

02

02

1212

00

05

00

1214

00

00

35

1213

00

02

01

1215

00

00

47

1216

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3877

1207

00

03

81

1208

00

01

78

1206

00

03

87

1205

00

00

20

1201

00

00

65

1203

00

00

20

1204

00

07

19

999

00

00

20

360

00

02

08

358

00

00

20

361

00

07

48

362

00

00

41

359

00

02

22

367

00

10

39

356

00

06

07

355

00

17

21

354

00

01

64

516

00

10

17

517

00

00

20

518

00

00

89

507

00

06

56

520

00

04

21

519

00

04

00

521

00

02

33

506

00

00

20

529

00

00

20

530

00

00

20

528

00

02

89

527

00

02

58

526

00

05

14

577

00

06

61

576

00

00

20

578

00

03

65

579

00

02

31

574

00

00

78

573

00

00

89

572

00

06

19

571

00

00

20

561

00

03

35

570

00

00

43

569

00

02

21

562

00

01

88

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3878

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

567

00

05

70

565

00

00

20

566

00

06

29

txnh'kiqj

txnh'kiqj

txnh'kiqj

txnh'kiqj

txnh'kiqj

597

00

00

99

Fkkuk uacj&160

Fkkuk uacj&160

Fkkuk uacj&160

Fkkuk uacj&160

Fkkuk uacj&160

598

00

00

20

599

00

00

20

603

00

02

70

602

00

04

44

601

00

02

29

600

00

01

73

612

00

00

20

593

00

06

17

592

00

02

21

591

00

00

89

587

00

00

20

613

00

08

24

614

00

10

45

616

00

04

22

617

00

02

62

618

00

01

87

619

00

02

89

625

00

03

84

620

00

00

92

624

00

04

24

621

00

00

20

626

00

00

32

623

00

03

51

548

00

04

56

547

00

08

18

549

00

00

20

551

00

03

03

546

00

12

65

655

00

00

20

665

00

00

20

657

00

00

96

659

00

02

75

545

00

00

53

544

00

00

69

543

00

00

20

660

00

04

34

661

00

04

64

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3879

663

00

00

20

662

00

00

20

671

00

02

12

672

00

00

20

676

00

01

80

675

00

01

79

670

00

00

20

674

00

03

83

677

00

00

20

678

00

00

97

679

00

04

66

681

00

01

28

680

00

00

20

740¼jkLrk½

740¼jkLrk½

740¼jkLrk½

740¼jkLrk½

740¼jkLrk½

00

00

00

00

00

02

02

02

02

02

90

90

90

90

90

1005

00

00

27

1004

00

00

20

1003

00

03

17

875

00

00

65

974

00

00

20

876

00

04

93

1002

00

04

12

997

00

01

89

878

00

00

20

988

00

05

14

995

00

00

20

1001

00

09

62

999

00

00

80

991

00

07

89

970

00

02

82

990

00

00

53

969

00

01

72

971

00

04

59

910

00

01

74

911

00

00

20

909

00

02

00

908

00

03

79

907

00

02

68

906

00

07

23

905

00

08

59

903

00

03

85

902

00

01

41

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3880

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ckaxjk

ckaxjk

ckaxjk

ckaxjk

ckaxjk

3581

00

05

95

Fkkuk uacj 156

Fkkuk uacj 156

Fkkuk uacj 156

Fkkuk uacj 156

Fkkuk uacj 156

3582

00

02

85

3583

00

00

20

3578¼jkLrk½

¼jkLrk½

¼jkLrk½

¼jkLrk½

¼jkLrk½

00

02

03

3003

00

00

60

3002

00

00

20

3004

00

10

74

3005

00

00

20

3006

00

02

85

3007

00

05

71

3008

00

07

79

3010

00

00

20

3014

00

01

53

3013

00

00

20

3015

00

02

62

3048

00

00

20

3047

00

00

20

3048

00

00

20

3046

00

00

60

3045

00

01

32

3016

00

01

58

3044

00

04

42

3018

00

00

20

3043

00

10

43

3042

00

05

02

3041

00

00

48

3040

00

02

80

3031

00

02

61

3036

00

00

66

3034

00

00

20

3035

00

05

07

3095¼jkLrk½

¼jkLrk½

¼jkLrk½

¼jkLrk½

¼jkLrk½

00

01

08

3099

00

03

79

3098

00

00

20

3100

00

00

33

3101

00

04

84

3102

00

01

30

3164

00

04

26

3103

00

00

20

3104

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3881

3163

00

02

92

3172

00

03

14

3171

00

01

51

3173

00

05

91

3180

00

00

20

3174

00

02

10

3175

00

00

20

3177

00

01

74

3176

00

07

24

3157

00

00

20

3156

00

04

26

3155

00

08

28

3154

00

02

45

3188

00

00

69

3189

00

10

69

3190

00

00

20

3204¼jkLrk½

¼jkLrk½

¼jkLrk½

¼jkLrk½

¼jkLrk½

00

01

92

3220

00

01

60

3219

00

04

35

3215

00

09

24

3214

00

00

20

3217

00

00

20

3216

00

03

26

3223

00

00

20

3213

00

00

82

3212

00

00

20

3211

00

00

20

3224

00

08

82

3208

00

08

19

3235

00

00

32

3207

00

03

00

3236

00

03

88

2489

00

00

36

3642

00

01

79

2488

00

14

85

2487

00

00

20

2493¼jkLrk½

¼jkLrk½

¼jkLrk½

¼jkLrk½

¼jkLrk½

00

01

98

2503

00

22

41

2505

00

00

20

2501

00

07

77

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3882

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2509

00

02

74

2510

00

01

89

2513

00

00

20

2498

00

09

62

2497

00

00

20

2463¼jkLrk½

¼jkLrk½

¼jkLrk½

¼jkLrk½

¼jkLrk½

00

03

20

2404

00

00

20

2408

00

02

46

2409

00

04

69

2410

00

06

16

2458

00

00

20

2457

00

06

01

2459

00

05

14

2460

00

04

51

2461

00

01

38

2452

00

05

39

2453

00

03

63

2454

00

00

20

2455

00

00

20

2446@3640

00

00

63

2447

00

00

60

2446

00

08

55

2419

00

00

20

2445

00

02

78

2420

00

02

02

2421

00

08

53

2423

00

00

20

2422

00

07

96

2424

00

04

95

2195

00

00

20

2425

00

01

51

2186

00

00

20

2187

00

04

84

2188

00

07

30

2189

00

03

59

3236@3642

00

00

20

2181¼jkLrk½

¼jkLrk½

¼jkLrk½

¼jkLrk½

¼jkLrk½

00

01

19

2151

00

03

49

2180

00

00

20

2150

00

02

16

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3883

2149

00

00

20

2152

00

06

09

2153

00

05

80

2154

00

09

32

2147

00

00

20

2155

00

04

72

2157

00

00

20

2156

00

00

20

¹iQk- la- vkj&25011@14@2013&vksvkj&Iº

iou oqQekj] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 27th July, 2013

S.O. 1535.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest

that a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited in Dist. Siwan in the State of Bihar for ‘Patna

to Motihari and Baitalpur Pipeline’ for the transportation of Petroleum Product;

And, whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is

necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which

is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and

Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby

declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the

date on which the copies of the notification issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as

published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of

the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land, to Shri Arun Kumar Jha B.A.S. & Competent

Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited. (Pipelines Division) P.O. Dhelwan, Sipara, Dist. Patna (Bihar.) Pin –

800020.

SCHEDULE

Dist.: Siwan

State : Bihar

Mouja / Village

Survey/BlockNo.

Sub-Div-No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

JALALPUR

2232-Nala

00

10

72

Thana No-236

2233-Nala

00

01

08

2238

00

01

65

2239

00

13

27

2240

00

00

20

2242

00

05

00

2247

00

04

91

2248

00

03

49

2258

00

10

30

2257

00

12

90

2256

00

01

43

2300

00

12

27

2299

00

09

48

2304

00

06

08

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3884

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2305

00

03

99

2306

00

00

20

2307

00

01

10

2308

00

02

37

2309

00

03

25

2314

00

01

14

2315

00

10

68

2316

00

06

12

2233-Nala

00

01

46

2226-Nala

00

03

80

2225-Nala

00

07

35

1075(CANAL)

00

01

78

1074(CANAL)

00

01

16

1073(CANAL)

00

02

38

988

00

00

20

987

00

02

30

986

00

06

94

986/9306

00

05

11

815

00

00

20

814

00

00

20

985

00

04

57

817

00

02

44

818

00

04

10

822

00

07

85

820

00

00

20

821

00

00

20

836

00

00

20

833/9307

00

06

69

833

00

04

03

834

00

10

18

775

00

00

20

777

00

05

89

786

00

05

18

787

00

00

20

778

00

02

35

779

00

03

87

785

00

04

48

784

00

01

60

735

00

00

20

780

00

00

26

781

00

03

07

782

00

01

49

783

00

00

20

738

00

01

63

739

00

00

20

737

00

07

25

744

00

02

19

745

00

00

20

743

00

00

75

748

00

09

69

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3885

749

00

00

95

429(ROAD)

00

01

18

311

00

13

18

310

00

00

20

313

00

02

39

328

00

05

21

324

00

04

87

325

00

02

08

327

00

00

20

273

00

07

93

274

00

00

20

326

00

00

35

267

00

00

20

269

00

08

14

268

00

05

04

259

00

00

20

251

00

01

19

252

00

01

76

253

00

01

97

256

00

00

76

254

00

02

58

255

00

09

28

239

00

00

20

244

00

00

20

243

00

00

78

245

00

00

20

242

00

02

86

241

00

03

54

236

00

01

60

3457

00

02

00

235

00

00

34

233

00

00

20

234

00

00

20

3458

00

10

47

MADARICHAK

919-Nala

00

02

80

Thana No-235

920-Nala

00

00

20

918-Nala

00

05

09

906-Nala

00

00

88

917

00

00

71

907

00

03

08

908

00

04

73

911

00

00

31

904

00

00

51

909

00

01

54

903

00

06

49

900

00

03

83

902

00

00

20

901

00

00

20

899

00

04

20

898

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3886

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

895

00

06

34

882

00

01

28

881

00

01

08

880

00

02

40

874

00

09

91

869-Brick Road

00

01

11

750-Brick Road

00

00

20

748

00

00

20

875

00

00

20

810

00

00

20

751

00

04

31

803

00

01

27

802

00

01

08

801

00

00

20

804

00

00

89

805

00

04

29

806

00

04

31

797-Nala

00

00

40

791

00

00

20

807

00

00

89

808-Nala

00

00

20

795-Nala

00

01

09

796-Nala

00

01

04

792

00

00

20

793

00

00

66

794-Nala

00

00

20

779

00

02

62

778

00

02

31

777

00

02

30

774

00

05

87

775

00

00

35

773/1191

00

00

00

773

00

00

00

772

00

00

20

BAGAURA

5674

00

06

41

Thana No-234

5675

00

05

80

5676

00

00

80

5677

00

03

09

5680

00

05

82

5681

00

02

01

5682

00

03

01

5717

00

04

82

5715

00

06

42

5714

00

02

13

5691

00

01

78

5692

00

00

93

5693

00

02

68

5694

00

02

83

5695

00

02

31

5696

00

02

36

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3887

5699

00

02

22

5700

00

01

80

5701

00

04

95

1472

00

02

29

1471

00

00

76

1470

00

02

19

1405

00

05

53

1404

00

08

68

1407

00

01

86

1409

00

04

62

1408

00

00

20

1413

00

02

45

1414

00

03

70

1417

00

01

96

1419

00

02

19

1420

00

08

35

1385

00

00

20

1124

00

14

70

1115

00

00

36

1116

00

15

55

721

00

05

63

720

00

05

51

719

00

05

94

718

00

04

14

634

00

02

44

656

00

00

20

657

00

10

50

633

00

00

20

649

00

01

72

648

00

20

71

640

00

05

72

639

00

00

20

641

00

01

65

642

00

01

01

643

00

03

79

106

00

07

38

107

00

00

20

108

00

00

20

105

00

00

46

104

00

03

19

109

00

04

06

103

00

05

17

110

00

02

85

111 (Road)

00

01

42

112

00

00

48

145

00

05

12

113

00

04

12

143

00

08

85

142

00

06

27

140

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3888

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

141

00

05

11

139

00

07

13

134

00

00

20

138

00

06

18

KAMSARA

1387

00

02

56

Thana No-232

1386

00

00

79

1400

00

04

08

1399

00

08

75

1401

00

05

94

1402

00

09

03

1398-Cart Track

00

01

67

1394

00

00

20

1395

00

00

20

1403

00

21

08

1404

00

00

72

1127

00

00

90

35-NH85

00

04

41

741

00

01

17

1407

00

00

44

740

00

01

94

731

00

00

20

739

00

03

91

738

00

01

22

1403

00

02

12

1398

00

01

41

1394

00

11

53

1393

00

05

22

1392

00

01

19

1376

00

08

16

1377

00

02

12

1375

00

07

45

1374

00

00

73

1372

00

07

13

1371

00

04

10

1370

00

04

10

1369

00

04

58

1132

00

00

20

1368

00

00

42

1365

00

08

37

1364

00

06

14

1133

00

00

10

1134

00

00

80

1363

00

03

43

1136

00

03

69

1135

00

00

20

1137

00

04

85

1138

00

00

20

1150-ROAD

00

01

34

1153

00

02

85

1152

00

02

15

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3889

1337

00

34

03

1158

00

00

20

1331

00

21

26

1330

00

06

55

1328

00

00

92

1327

00

00

20

739

00

00

70

738

00

04

91

737

00

02

48

736

00

00

20

733

00

00

77

734

00

07

89

735

00

06

07

732

00

00

20

274-Railway

00

09

85

722

00

14

80

721

00

22

14

720

00

00

11

691

00

01

55

690 (Road)

00

01

23

689 (Nala)

00

02

35

BALUHI

296

00

02

06

Thana No-233

207

00

07

28

207/322

00

09

01

206

00

02

77

205

00

02

75

204

00

01

99

208 (Unlined Canal)

00

01

26

203

00

00

20

319

00

12

24

320

00

00

20

317

00

00

29

316

00

08

75

199

00

04

30

198

00

00

45

108 (Unlined Canal)

00

01

74

150

00

04

09

149

00

03

74

154

00

07

49

156

00

07

11

155

00

00

62

157

00

08

02

111

00

10

66

110

00

03

96

112

00

00

20

109

00

14

12

103 (CART TRACK)

00

02

52

102

00

05

70

101

00

03

64

100/299

00

03

60

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3890

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

87

00

12

03

96

00

07

02

309

00

05

58

305

00

00

57

94

00

00

20

95

00

12

61

304

00

00

20

94/326

00

13

74

93

00

10

31

1 (Unlined Canal)

00

01

38

BALDIH

76

00

08

18

Thana No-183

77

00

00

20

75

00

00

20

78

00

00

20

79

00

02

08

80

00

00

20

90

00

09

66

91

00

00

46

74 (CART TRACK)

00

01

29

56

00

02

82

55

00

08

97

54

00

00

20

53

00

00

73

51

00

00

20

97

00

09

42

96

00

03

23

95

00

01

38

94

00

00

20

98

00

06

69

99

00

04

22

101

00

00

20

100

00

07

38

102

00

00

22

103

00

11

25

RANIBARI

339

00

00

91

Thana No-182

355

00

17

74

347

00

00

20

346

00

00

20

348

00

05

23

349

00

09

61

351

00

00

20

350

00

05

28

301

00

00

20

352

00

03

91

353

00

00

20

290

00

00

20

289

00

03

66

288

00

10

92

287

00

06

61

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3891

264

00

00

20

266

00

05

99

271

00

04

08

282

00

00

20

270

00

00

20

273

00

02

42

272

00

07

42

223

00

00

20

275

00

01

07

274

00

04

01

222

00

00

20

221

00

02

55

220

00

06

37

BAIDAPUR

588

00

00

52

Thana No-184

585

00

00

20

589

00

14

44

593

00

00

20

590

00

08

49

591

00

04

82

592

00

04

07

602

00

02

48

603

00

00

90

604

00

00

20

605

00

00

20

965 (ROAD)

00

03

77

966

00

00

20

964

00

06

31

963

00

15

05

956

00

00

20

962

00

07

08

959

00

00

20

961

00

05

98

960

00

01

11

819

00

05

45

820

00

02

51

821

00

02

31

823

00

01

73

824

00

01

86

825

00

02

08

828

00

01

33

831

00

01

14

832

00

01

04

827

00

01

44

835

00

01

39

836

00

02

44

837

00

03

45

838

00

04

95

839

00

01

10

840

00

00

93

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3892

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

841

00

01

05

BISHUNPURA

1538

00

01

85

Thana No-165

1537

00

00

20

1536

00

00

20

1535

00

00

20

1534

00

00

20

1539

00

02

07

1540

00

02

15

1541

00

03

83

1542

00

03

22

1547

00

00

20

1543

00

10

58

1546

00

03

00

1532

00

00

90

1544

00

02

24

1545

00

00

20

1640(ROAD)

00

02

19

758

00

06

85

764

00

02

94

759

00

03

56

760

00

01

84

761

00

03

59

762

00

00

20

719

00

07

06

748

00

01

18

720

00

01

10

718

00

00

51

721

00

01

26

722

00

07

15

730

00

00

95

729

00

00

20

731

00

03

94

732

00

00

41

735

00

02

26

735

00

02

00

736

00

03

35

740

00

00

20

739

00

00

20

656

00

00

20

738

00

08

20

688

00

04

14

687

00

03

61

686

00

02

83

685

00

02

97

661

00

04

89

662

00

03

27

666

00

03

26

667

00

02

67

641

00

02

27

639

00

02

32

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3893

640

00

02

25

275

00

02

40

434

00

04

17

433

00

01

00

432

00

02

95

431

00

01

51

430

00

00

83

429

00

02

64

428

00

02

74

427

00

05

35

424

00

01

29

289

00

00

20

425

00

03

03

426

00

00

20

422

00

00

20

423

00

10

14

283

00

00

20

403

00

01

05

402

00

05

14

399/1641

00

06

37

398

00

01

09

397

00

02

16

385

00

02

43

386

00

02

77

387

00

00

35

307(ROAD)

00

01

13

374

00

00

20

372

00

00

20

378

00

01

27

379

00

04

08

380

00

03

91

381

00

01

02

382

00

00

20

373

00

09

16

369

00

09

64

368

00

04

39

367

00

02

46

366

00

02

78

365

00

04

61

364

00

08

47

363

00

02

47

336

00

05

74

362

00

05

87

337

00

03

62

361

00

01

22

359

00

03

27

358

00

00

20

356

00

00

20

351

00

00

20

360

00

01

17

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3894

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

355

00

02

39

352

00

02

22

350

00

10

88

349

00

01

61

RUKUNDIPUR Thana No.-168

1635-Road

00

01

60

1634

00

02

53

1630

00

00

64

1629

00

02

34

1636

00

00

20

1628

00

02

85

1627

00

01

48

1637

00

00

40

1625

00

03

73

1626

00

01

09

1621

00

00

20

1622

00

06

60

1619

00

02

97

1615

00

00

20

1616

00

03

09

1613

00

03

50

1611

00

03

65

1609

00

02

80

1588

00

02

55

1589

00

02

58

1594

00

00

20

1593

00

01

45

1596

00

00

20

1592

00

00

20

1595

00

01

65

1599

00

01

76

1598

00

00

35

1575

00

02

22

1572

00

03

06

1571

00

04

71

1569

00

00

43

1508

00

00

20

1570

00

02

00

1567

00

03

35

1566

00

01

67

1565

00

01

13

1564

00

00

63

1512

00

00

20

1513

00

03

97

1561

00

00

20

1562

00

00

20

1514

00

03

78

1515

00

03

39

1534

00

05

63

1516

00

02

02

1517

00

04

00

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3895

1518

00

00

82

1519

00

04

92

1520

00

00

26

1526

00

04

08

1528

00

01

66

1625

00

04

47

1637

00

00

48

1527

00

05

74

1409

00

08

88

1445

00

00

69

1446

00

00

20

1444

00

00

20

1410

00

04

67

1412

00

03

26

1411

00

00

71

1413

00

05

31

1414

00

01

73

1254

00

03

96

1230

00

00

20

1255

00

00

80

1257

00

00

20

1258

00

00

20

1253

00

00

45

1249

00

01

91

1248

00

02

14

1247

00

02

61

1246

00

03

32

1245

00

04

31

1244

00

00

20

1242

00

08

30

1243

00

04

37

1220-canal

00

03

17

1211

00

00

20

1209

00

02

02

1212

00

05

00

1214

00

00

35

1213

00

02

01

1215

00

00

47

1216

00

00

20

1207

00

03

81

1208

00

01

78

1206

00

03

87

1205

00

00

20

1201

00

00

65

1203

00

00

20

1204

00

07

19

999

00

00

20

360

00

02

08

358

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3896

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

361

00

07

48

362

00

00

41

359

00

02

22

367

00

10

39

356

00

06

07

355

00

17

21

354

00

01

64

516

00

10

17

517

00

00

20

518

00

00

89

507

00

06

56

520

00

04

21

519

00

04

00

521

00

02

33

506

00

00

20

529

00

00

20

530

00

00

20

528

00

02

89

527

00

02

58

526

00

05

14

577

00

06

61

576

00

00

20

578

00

03

65

579

00

02

31

574

00

00

78

573

00

00

89

572

00

06

19

571

00

00

20

561

00

03

35

570

00

00

43

569

00

02

21

562

00

01

88

567

00

05

70

565

00

00

20

566

00

06

29

JAGDISHPUR

597

00

00

99

Thana No.-160

598

00

00

20

599

00

00

20

603

00

02

70

602

00

04

44

601

00

02

29

600

00

01

73

612

00

00

20

593

00

06

17

592

00

02

21

591

00

00

89

587

00

00

20

613

00

08

24

614

00

10

45

616

00

04

22

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3897

617

00

02

62

618

00

01

87

619

00

02

89

625

00

03

84

620

00

00

92

624

00

04

24

621

00

00

20

626

00

00

32

623

00

03

51

548

00

04

56

547

00

08

18

549

00

00

20

551

00

03

03

546

00

12

65

655

00

00

20

665

00

00

20

657

00

00

96

659

00

02

75

545

00

00

53

544

00

00

69

543

00

00

20

660

00

04

34

661

00

04

64

663

00

00

20

662

00

00

20

671

00

02

12

672

00

00

20

676

00

01

80

675

00

01

79

670

00

00

20

674

00

03

83

677

00

00

20

678

00

00

97

679

00

04

66

681

00

01

28

680

00

00

20

740(ROAD)

00

02

90

1005

00

00

27

1004

00

00

20

1003

00

03

17

875

00

00

65

974

00

00

20

876

00

04

93

1002

00

04

12

997

00

01

89

878

00

00

20

988

00

05

14

995

00

00

20

1001

00

09

62

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3898

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

999

00

00

80

991

00

07

89

970

00

02

82

990

00

00

53

969

00

01

72

971

00

04

59

910

00

01

74

911

00

00

20

909

00

02

00

908

00

03

79

907

00

02

68

906

00

07

23

905

00

08

59

903

00

03

85

902

00

01

41

BANGRA

3581

00

05

95

Thana No.-156

3582

00

02

85

3583

00

00

20

3578(ROAD)

00

02

03

3003

00

00

60

3002

00

00

20

3004

00

10

74

3005

00

00

20

3006

00

02

85

3007

00

05

71

3008

00

07

79

3010

00

00

20

3014

00

01

53

3013

00

00

20

3015

00

02

62

3048

00

00

20

3047

00

00

20

3048

00

00

20

3046

00

00

60

3045

00

01

32

3016

00

01

58

3044

00

04

42

3018

00

00

20

3043

00

10

43

3042

00

05

02

3041

00

00

48

3040

00

02

80

3031

00

02

61

3036

00

00

66

3034

00

00

20

3035

00

05

07

3095(ROAD)

00

01

08

3099

00

03

79

3098

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3899

3100

00

00

33

3101

00

04

84

3102

00

01

30

3164

00

04

26

3103

00

00

20

3104

00

00

20

3163

00

02

92

3172

00

03

14

3171

00

01

51

3173

00

05

91

3180

00

00

20

3174

00

02

10

3175

00

00

20

3177

00

01

74

3176

00

07

24

3157

00

00

20

3156

00

04

26

3155

00

08

28

3154

00

02

45

3188

00

00

69

3189

00

10

69

3190

00

00

20

3204(ROAD)

00

01

92

3220

00

01

60

3219

00

04

35

3215

00

09

24

3214

00

00

20

3217

00

00

20

3216

00

03

26

3223

00

00

20

3213

00

00

82

3212

00

00

20

3211

00

00

20

3224

00

08

82

3208

00

08

19

3235

00

00

32

3207

00

03

00

3236

00

03

88

2489

00

00

36

3642

00

01

79

2488

00

14

85

2487

00

00

20

2493(ROAD)

00

01

98

2503

00

22

41

2505

00

00

20

2501

00

07

77

2509

00

02

74

2510

00

01

89

2513

00

00

20

2498

00

09

62

2497

00

00

20

2463(ROAD)

00

03

20

2404

00

00

20

2408

00

02

46

2409

00

04

69

2410

00

06

16

2458

00

00

20

2457

00

06

01

2459

00

05

14

2460

00

04

51

2461

00

01

38

2452

00

05

39

2453

00

03

63

2454

00

00

20

2455

00

00

20

2446/3640

00

00

63

2447

00

00

60

2446

00

08

55

2419

00

00

20

2445

00

02

78

2420

00

02

02

2421

00

08

53

2423

00

00

20

2422

00

07

96

2424

00

04

95

2195

00

00

20

2425

00

01

51

2186

00

00

20

2187

00

04

84

2188

00

07

30

2189

00

03

59

3236/3642

00

00

20

2181(ROAD)

00

01

19

2151

00

03

49

2180

00

00

20

2150

00

02

16

2149

00

00

20

2152

00

06

09

2153

00

05

80

2154

00

09

32

2147

00

00

20

2155

00

04

72

2157

00

00

20

2156

00

00

20

[F. No. R-25011/14/2013-OR-I]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

3900

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

ubZ fnYyh] 27 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1536-—dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slk izrhr gksrk gS fd yksd fgr esa ;g vko';d gS fd iVuk ls eksfrgkjh vkSj csrkyiqj rd

isVªksfy;e inkFkks± ds ifjogu gsrq ftyk floku] jkT; fcgkj esa bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkuh pkfg, A

vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slh ikbiykbu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, vko';d izrhr gksrk gS fd ml Hkwfe esa ftlds Hkhrj mDr

ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkus dk izLrko gS vkSj tks bl vf/lwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa o£.kr gS] mi;ksx dk vtZu fd;k tk, A

vr% vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbUl (Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/dkj dk vtZu) vf/kfu;e] 1962 (1962

dk 50) dh /kkjk 3 dh mi&/kjk(1) }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] mDr Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/dkj dk vtZu djus ds vius

vk'k; dh ?kks"k.kk djrh gS A

dksbZ O;fDr] tks mDr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa fgrc¼ gS] ml rkjh[k ls ftldks] Hkkjr ds jkti=k esa ;Fkk izdkf'kr bl

vfèklwpuk dh izfr;ka lk/kj.k turk dks miyC/ djk nh tkrh gSa] bDdhl fnu ds vUnj] Hkwfe ds Hkhrj ikbiykbu fcNk, tkus gsrq mi;ksx

ds vf/dkj ds vtZu ds fy,] Jh v:.k dqekj >k] fc-iz-ls- o l{ke izkf/dkjh bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs”ku fyfeVsM] (ikbiykbu fMohtu)

iVuk] iks-vks- <syok] flikjk] ftyk iVuk] fiu% 800020] fcgkj dks fyf[kr :i eas vk{ksi Hkst ldsxk A

vuqlwph

ftyk % floku

jkT; % fcgkj

ekStk@xzke

losZ@Cykd@la- (IyksV la-)

lc&Mho&la-

{ks=kiQy

gsDVs;j

vkjs

oxZ ehVj

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

Hkh[kk cu

Hkh[kk cu

Hkh[kk cu

Hkh[kk cu

Hkh[kk cu

28

00

10

03

Fkkuk uacj&169

Fkkuk uacj&169

Fkkuk uacj&169

Fkkuk uacj&169

Fkkuk uacj&169

26

00

14

11

40

00

04

55

22 ¼jkLrk½

22 ¼jkLrk½

22 ¼jkLrk½

22 ¼jkLrk½

22 ¼jkLrk½

00

0000

0000

02

0202

0202

34

3434

3434

16

00

05

15

43

00

00

20

44

00

00

20

36

00

00

20

41

00

09

87

42

00

03

86

15

00

00

20

2331

00

01

38

2332 ¼unh½

2332 ¼unh½

2332 ¼unh½

2332 ¼unh½

2332 ¼unh½

00

0000

0000

03

0303

0303

57

5757

5757

nsmjh;k

nsmjh;k

nsmjh;k

nsmjh;k

nsmjh;k

381 ¼unh½

381 ¼unh½

381 ¼unh½

381 ¼unh½

381 ¼unh½

00

0000

0000

03

0303

0303

25

2525

2525

Fkkuk uacj&153

Fkkuk uacj&153

Fkkuk uacj&153

Fkkuk uacj&153

Fkkuk uacj&153

382 ¼jkLrk½

382 ¼jkLrk½

382 ¼jkLrk½

382 ¼jkLrk½

382 ¼jkLrk½

00

0000

0000

01

0101

0101

36

3636

3636

379 ¼jkLrk½

379 ¼jkLrk½

379 ¼jkLrk½

379 ¼jkLrk½

379 ¼jkLrk½

00

0000

0000

00

0000

0000

20

2020

2020

384

00

00

38

387

00

00

20

378

00

04

12

377

00

00

20

371

00

05

35

373

00

00

20

372

00

00

20

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3901

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3902

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

370

00

01

03

369

00

02

82

368

00

03

42

366

00

00

25

367

00

07

41

8

00

00

20

9

00

00

20

10

00

00

53

11

00

00

81

12

00

03

00

13

00

10

22

364

00

00

20

16

00

00

20

17

00

00

20

15

00

00

20

20

00

09

28

21

00

00

20

22

00

00

20

19

00

01

32

18

00

00

32

24

00

02

40

25

00

02

16

26

00

02

66

29

00

00

85

30

00

00

20

1183 ¼jkLrk½

1183 ¼jkLrk½

1183 ¼jkLrk½

1183 ¼jkLrk½

1183 ¼jkLrk½

00

0000

0000

05

0505

0505

75

7575

7575

1251

00

08

37

1250

00

01

91

1249

00

00

20

1437

00

00

20

1436

00

00

20

1252

00

01

31

1253

00

04

26

1254

00

04

44

1266

00

07

42

1265

00

01

26

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3903

1267

00

02

45

1267@3930

00

01

24

1268

00

00

20

1281

00

01

96

1282

00

07

06

1311

00

05

50

1310

00

00

20

1312

00

02

98

1313

00

00

20

1314

00

04

92

1315

00

00

20

1317

00

00

78

1318

00

03

33

1323

00

07

74

1324@3931

00

00

20

1325

00

00

20

1329

00

00

34

1330

00

13

47

1332

00

03

50

1812

00

16

17

ch’kwuiwj egkSjh Fkkuk uacj&154

ch’kwuiwj egkSjh Fkkuk uacj&154

ch’kwuiwj egkSjh Fkkuk uacj&154

ch’kwuiwj egkSjh Fkkuk uacj&154

ch’kwuiwj egkSjh Fkkuk uacj&154

2727

00

04

45

2728

00

06

28

2732

00

05

68

2729

00

00

20

2733

00

04

74

2731

00

00

20

2734

00

02

53

2735

00

00

20

2739

00

09

48

2738

00

10

40

2740

00

00

57

2737

00

02

39

2804

00

06

78

2831

00

01

91

2830

00

02

75

2826

00

03

44

2827

00

02

71

2828

00

02

53

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3904

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2806

00

00

20

2825

00

00

20

2823

00

11

34

2822

00

01

82

2821

00

06

07

2819

00

04

82

2818

00

00

20

2820

00

00

20

2855

00

01

63

2817

00

00

20

2816

00

01

73

2815

00

00

20

2813

00

00

20

2856

00

06

54

2857

00

03

71

2858

00

07

52

2859

00

00

20

2896

00

07

48

2895

00

05

21

2891

00

01

93

2892

00

00

20

2890

00

03

44

2889

00

03

87

2885

00

08

52

2882

00

03

27

2883

00

03

76

2881

00

05

54

2879

00

04

30

2930 ¼jkLrk½

2930 ¼jkLrk½

2930 ¼jkLrk½

2930 ¼jkLrk½

2930 ¼jkLrk½

00

0000

0000

02

0202

0202

35

3535

3535

1959

00

00

20

1954

00

21

47

1951

00

00

84

1955

00

08

32

1956

00

00

32

1949

00

03

00

1973

00

01

01

1948

00

18

55

1974

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3905

1947

00

04

76

1946

00

05

16

1945

00

03

70

1944

00

06

04

1943

00

04

81

1942

00

04

55

1941

00

04

44

1940

00

04

40

1938

00

05

02

1937

00

00

20

1933

00

13

46

1932

00

02

97

2917¼jkLrk½

2917¼jkLrk½

2917¼jkLrk½

2917¼jkLrk½

2917¼jkLrk½

00

0000

0000

06

0606

0606

85

8585

8585

1931

00

00

38

1863

00

00

20

1857

00

07

12

1856

00

01

25

1855

00

00

85

1844

00

00

38

1843

00

00

20

1751

00

00

85

1752

00

00

20

1750

00

01

83

1749

00

09

85

1748

00

01

52

lwjchj

lwjchj

lwjchj

lwjchj

lwjchj

213

00

18

25

Fkkuk uacj&152

Fkkuk uacj&152

Fkkuk uacj&152

Fkkuk uacj&152

Fkkuk uacj&152

214

00

04

82

215

00

01

57

821

00

00

20

820

00

00

20

819

00

01

43

815

00

05

01

814

00

03

63

816

00

00

20

813

00

00

20

812

00

09

53

808

00

00

20

811

00

02

45

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3906

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

809

00

02

81

810

00

00

20

837

00

00

66

836

00

00

20

835

00

00

20

838

00

03

09

839

00

03

62

840

00

01

86

841

00

00

26

855

00

00

20

856

00

28

94

976

00

00

20

858

00

00

25

859

00

00

20

857

00

00

73

865

00

04

16

964

00

00

20

866

00

04

25

974

00

01

28

973

00

01

62

971

00

00

37

972

00

03

01

970

00

00

45

968

00

04

49

965

00

00

73

966

00

01

10

963

00

03

50

962

00

02

00

961

00

00

20

960

00

00

63

993

00

02

80

992

00

02

22

994

00

03

26

995

00

01

03

997

00

00

94

996

00

00

20

998

00

00

91

1229

00

00

60

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3907

1228

00

02

79

996

00

00

20

1227

00

04

96

1226

00

07

42

1225

00

00

20

1221

00

03

63

1222

00

05

32

1225

00

00

20

1220

00

02

63

1022

00

00

20

1219

00

04

41

1218

00

01

64

1217

00

00

43

1216

00

05

36

1223

00

00

20

1207

00

00

20

1209

00

04

65

1210

00

03

92

1208

00

06

04

1211

00

14

44

1204

00

00

77

1199

00

00

71

1198

00

07

65

1190

00

08

03

1185

00

06

06

1179

00

03

53

1178

00

00

20

1176

00

00

20

1174

00

00

20

1173

00

00

20

1175

00

00

20

1171

00

09

46

1162

00

00

39

1160

00

00

20

1163

00

02

85

1164

00

00

20

1170

00

00

20

1159

00

04

79

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3908

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1158

00

04

79

1041 ¼jkLrk½

1041 ¼jkLrk½

1041 ¼jkLrk½

1041 ¼jkLrk½

1041 ¼jkLrk½

00

0000

0000

02

0202

0202

21

2121

2121

1125

00

00

20

1328

00

01

22

1329

00

05

25

1330

00

01

79

1331

00

00

94

1332

00

03

89

1333

00

00

28

1340

00

03

16

1342

00

02

12

1343

00

00

20

1341

00

01

77

1339

00

07

37

1345

00

00

20

1348

00

03

11

1347

00

00

20

1350

00

00

20

1524

00

00

20

1349

00

03

15

1523

00

02

45

1524

00

00

20

1522

00

03

14

1520

00

05

71

1415 ¼dPpk jkLrk½

1415 ¼dPpk jkLrk½

1415 ¼dPpk jkLrk½

1415 ¼dPpk jkLrk½

1415 ¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

0000

0000

01

0101

0101

89

8989

8989

1405

00

05

30

1366

00

00

61

1365

00

00

20

1404

00

14

11

1406

00

10

55

1414

00

00

20

1407

00

02

13

1408

00

02

45

1409

00

04

39

1401

00

04

58

1400

00

01

66

1397

00

01

32

1424

00

01

11

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3909

1426

00

03

70

1427

00

09

30

1428

00

05

04

1429

00

00

99

1430

00

02

98

1431

00

00

20

bBkjh

bBkjh

bBkjh

bBkjh

bBkjh

772

00

14

69

Fkkuk uacj&145

Fkkuk uacj&145

Fkkuk uacj&145

Fkkuk uacj&145

Fkkuk uacj&145

773

00

00

20

808

00

05

15

809

00

00

20

807

00

11

09

806

00

08

02

805

00

06

28

804

00

07

23

651

00

01

94

650

00

04

02

649

00

09

32

648

00

04

36

647

00

02

17

813

00

03

34

634

00

00

20

635

00

00

20

814

00

25

45

815

00

11

96

615

00

04

84

614

00

00

20

816

00

00

20

620

00

01

16

619

00

00

90

616

00

04

87

618

00

01

77

617

00

00

93

395

00

07

18

394

00

18

97

396

00

00

20

397

00

00

20

398

00

00

20

399

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3910

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

400

00

00

20

401

00

01

52

402

00

00

74

403

00

00

20

404

00

00

20

405¼ukyk½

405¼ukyk½

405¼ukyk½

405¼ukyk½

405¼ukyk½

00

0000

0000

02

0202

0202

21

2121

2121

511

00

02

97

511@877

00

02

34

509¼jkLrk½

509¼jkLrk½

509¼jkLrk½

509¼jkLrk½

509¼jkLrk½

00

0000

0000

01

0101

0101

60

6060

6060

407

00

02

06

408

00

00

20

406

00

03

85

410

00

00

53

413

00

00

20

333

00

19

27

366

00

00

20

334

00

00

20

335

00

00

20

336

00

00

88

332

00

03

57

339

00

00

49

340

00

01

67

331

00

06

79

330@875

00

02

66

330

00

01

97

341

00

01

99

342

00

00

20

328

00

07

76

329

00

00

63

322

00

00

85

323

00

07

07

321

00

00

20

324

00

12

12

325

00

02

10

319 ¼fQYM psuy½

319 ¼fQYM psuy½

319 ¼fQYM psuy½

319 ¼fQYM psuy½

319 ¼fQYM psuy½

00

0000

0000

01

0101

0101

10

1010

1010

316

00

05

28

307

00

03

96

315

00

08

12

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3911

309

00

00

20

310

00

02

82

311

00

03

28

312

00

13

24

ggok

ggok

ggok

ggok

ggok

1152¼jkLrk½

1152¼jkLrk½

1152¼jkLrk½

1152¼jkLrk½

1152¼jkLrk½

00

0000

0000

01

0101

0101

67

6767

6767

Fkkuk uacj&130

Fkkuk uacj&130

Fkkuk uacj&130

Fkkuk uacj&130

Fkkuk uacj&130

1151

00

03

22

1150

00

01

38

1147

00

01

75

1146

00

03

28

1145

00

04

80

1143

00

06

76

1142

00

09

23

1141¼fQYM psuy½

1141¼fQYM psuy½

1141¼fQYM psuy½

1141¼fQYM psuy½

1141¼fQYM psuy½

00

0000

0000

00

0000

0000

79

7979

7979

1139

00

00

20

1138

00

05

53

1137

00

02

27

1126

00

00

20

1136

00

04

84

1134

00

29

31

1134@1483

00

00

20

txnh’kiwj

txnh’kiwj

txnh’kiwj

txnh’kiwj

txnh’kiwj

286

00

04

84

Fkkuk uacj&129

Fkkuk uacj&129

Fkkuk uacj&129

Fkkuk uacj&129

Fkkuk uacj&129

285

00

00

20

288

00

02

26

287

00

06

89

283

00

03

00

291

00

00

20

315

00

00

51

281

00

01

57

316

00

00

64

314

00

00

20

250

00

01

61

317

00

14

07

249

00

00

26

318

00

00

45

324

00

00

25

325

00

00

20

326

00

00

65

332

00

07

30

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3912

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

334

00

00

20

336

00

00

20

331

00

00

54

333

00

01

02

337

00

03

27

330

00

00

20

342

00

03

27

338

00

00

47

340

00

00

54

341

00

00

57

506

00

02

26

507

00

02

41

509

00

02

72

510

00

00

42

512

00

02

78

508

00

00

20

528

00

00

20

527

00

04

67

526

00

00

20

537

00

00

20

529

00

00

20

535

00

03

81

536

00

00

99

539

00

03

44

540

00

01

95

542

00

02

07

543

00

02

97

534

00

02

17

544

00

04

15

550

00

03

11

551

00

03

26

556

00

03

94

555

00

00

20

552

00

00

20

554

00

00

20

557

00

03

98

559

00

00

20

558

00

03

83

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3913

564¼jkLrk½

564¼jkLrk½

564¼jkLrk½

564¼jkLrk½

564¼jkLrk½

00

0000

0000

03

0303

0303

05

0505

0505

856

00

09

67

857

00

00

81

858

00

03

34

859

00

01

87

862

00

00

20

860

00

05

13

890

00

00

31

861

00

04

96

889

00

02

17

863

00

04

18

880

00

03

32

881

00

05

89

885

00

00

25

882

00

01

67

886

00

00

20

884

00

03

73

883

00

05

42

jhlkSjk

jhlkSjk

jhlkSjk

jhlkSjk

jhlkSjk

4469

00

01

12

Fkkuk uacj&131

Fkkuk uacj&131

Fkkuk uacj&131

Fkkuk uacj&131

Fkkuk uacj&131

4468

00

00

20

4467

00

00

20

4425

00

01

50

4426

00

01

15

4427

00

01

91

4433

00

07

82

4432

00

00

20

4434

00

04

52

4436

00

06

96

4437

00

00

59

4438

00

01

26

4447

00

07

12

4448

00

09

79

4449

00

00

20

4450

00

09

48

4451

00

05

83

4452

00

03

92

4453

00

09

76

4356

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3914

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

4454

00

00

93

4520

00

01

53

4519

00

01

62

4518

00

00

20

4521

00

03

76

4522

00

06

86

4531

00

00

20

4523

00

00

20

4530

00

00

20

4524

00

00

53

4525

00

02

27

4526

00

04

07

4527

00

03

87

4528

00

02

69

4529

00

00

47

3553

00

03

75

3509

00

08

31

3552

00

00

20

3510

00

02

29

3551

00

00

20

3511

00

02

31

3512

00

02

21

3513

00

01

75

3514

00

01

48

3508

00

01

20

3515

00

00

46

3516

00

05

69

3497

00

00

20

3496

00

00

20

3517

00

03

04

3518

00

02

18

3520

00

00

20

3494

00

00

47

3493

00

01

81

3519

00

06

30

3492

00

01

80

3491

00

02

34

3207

00

00

61

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3915

3211

00

07

08

3208

00

00

22

3210

00

00

20

3217

00

18

75

3215

00

00

20

3216

00

00

44

3219

00

04

17

3228

00

14

38

3227

00

02

15

3226

00

00

28

3225

00

00

20

3103¼jkLrk½

3103¼jkLrk½

3103¼jkLrk½

3103¼jkLrk½

3103¼jkLrk½

00

0000

0000

01

0101

0101

66

6666

6666

3007

00

03

02

2995

00

01

86

2994

00

00

20

2993

00

00

20

3000

00

02

48

3001

00

00

20

2996

00

06

28

2997

00

00

20

2999

00

04

69

2998

00

02

24

2865¼jkLrk½

2865¼jkLrk½

2865¼jkLrk½

2865¼jkLrk½

2865¼jkLrk½

00

0000

0000

01

0101

0101

46

4646

4646

2965

00

05

08

2966

00

00

20

2963

00

00

20

2964

00

04

32

2963

00

02

49

2958

00

01

91

2957

00

01

55

2956

00

03

28

2904

00

00

20

2905

00

00

29

2906

00

00

83

2955

00

02

00

2907

00

01

11

2908

00

02

15

2953

00

00

45

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3916

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2952

00

00

20

2951

00

00

20

2932

00

00

20

2900

00

00

20

2909

00

02

89

2910

00

01

47

2911

00

01

53

2912

00

04

45

2899

00

07

10

2913

00

01

26

2914

00

00

20

2896

00

00

20

2897

00

01

49

2898

00

04

49

2831

00

03

22

2879

00

04

65

2878

00

00

26

2877

00

00

20

2834

00

00

20

2833

00

10

08

2832

00

02

07

2829

00

00

20

2836

00

04

13

2835

00

06

34

2787

00

08

63

2786

00

00

20

2788

00

01

91

2662

00

02

81

2665

00

02

76

2661

00

00

20

2666

00

03

03

2671

00

03

34

2670

00

00

20

2672

00

00

20

2673

00

03

73

2674

00

05

06

2637

00

02

73

2638

00

03

60

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3917

2639

00

00

29

2640

00

06

55

2641

00

01

00

vxs;ku

vxs;ku

vxs;ku

vxs;ku

vxs;ku

4450

00

06

57

Fkkuk uacj&113

Fkkuk uacj&113

Fkkuk uacj&113

Fkkuk uacj&113

Fkkuk uacj&113

4445

00

02

89

4449

00

00

20

4448

00

01

01

4451

00

04

72

4452

00

00

20

4454

00

13

87

4543

00

03

91

4542

00

00

20

4455

00

04

76

4456

00

00

20

4535

00

17

98

4540

00

00

20

4538

00

00

57

4539

00

00

20

4537

00

00

20

4536

00

04

57

4527

00

00

35

4528

00

04

39

4526

00

00

20

4529

00

00

82

4533

00

00

20

4530

00

04

11

4512

00

00

20

4531

00

00

49

4511

00

04

61

4510

00

00

20

4509

00

00

34

4507

00

02

11

4506

00

00

20

4505

00

00

20

4508

00

06

43

4495

00

01

42

3668¼dPpk jkLrk½

3668¼dPpk jkLrk½

3668¼dPpk jkLrk½

3668¼dPpk jkLrk½

3668¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

0000

0000

02

0202

0202

42

4242

4242

4598

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3918

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

4599

00

03

46

4600

00

04

15

4601

00

00

60

4602

00

04

93

4603

00

05

57

4611

00

00

20

4610

00

01

63

4609

00

08

16

4606

00

01

51

4607

00

00

20

4608

00

08

33

3666

00

00

80

3665

00

04

72

3664

00

00

20

3701

00

00

20

3702

00

05

94

3703

00

00

61

3704

00

07

31

3705

00

00

20

3709

00

00

72

3708

00

02

94

3707

00

00

20

3710

00

00

20

3491

00

04

34

3489

00

00

29

3490

00

04

41

3492

00

01

52

3493

00

03

40

3488

00

00

20

3494

00

06

68

3496

00

00

20

3487

00

01

66

3485

00

00

20

3486

00

02

42

3495

00

03

20

3469

00

07

20

3468

00

04

08

3470

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3919

3464

00

04

62

3465

00

00

53

3463

00

01

72

3454

00

09

43

3453

00

00

59

3452

00

07

91

3451

00

00

20

3450

00

01

82

3449

00

04

24

3455

00

00

20

3445

00

01

21

3448

00

04

09

3446

00

01

01

3447

00

03

04

3443

00

00

20

3442

00

07

59

3439

00

00

20

3440

00

02

97

3441

00

10

98

3395

00

00

20

3420

00

01

24

3401

00

00

20

3402

00

01

60

3403

00

03

52

3404

00

05

02

3405

00

03

46

3406

00

02

20

3407

00

00

20

3332

00

00

25

3331

00

05

51

3330

00

00

20

3329

00

06

43

3324

00

00

20

3328

00

05

38

3326

00

04

52

3325

00

01

28

2843¼jkLrk½

2843¼jkLrk½

2843¼jkLrk½

2843¼jkLrk½

2843¼jkLrk½

00

0000

0000

01

0101

0101

66

6666

6666

2618

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3920

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2622

00

06

66

2620

00

01

91

2621

00

08

69

2590

00

02

78

2591

00

00

20

2589

00

01

60

2587

00

05

06

2588

00

04

67

2570

00

00

20

2578

00

07

23

2579

00

00

20

2577

00

03

71

2576

00

02

71

2531

00

06

44

2528

00

00

20

2532

00

01

93

2530

00

01

28

2524

00

01

07

2523

00

01

30

2520

00

00

63

2519

00

00

93

2533

00

01

56

1771

00

06

22

1743

00

00

41

1771@5002

00

00

75

1772

00

00

38

1773

00

00

56

1774

00

00

36

1775

00

00

37

1770

00

03

60

1769

00

00

88

1744

00

00

31

1767

00

02

63

1766

00

01

93

1765

00

00

20

1745

00

00

69

1746

00

00

93

1763

00

01

40

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3921

1762

00

01

31

1761

00

01

20

1747

00

01

84

1748

00

03

22

1760

00

00

93

1758

00

00

56

1757

00

00

34

1753

00

05

40

1750

00

00

20

1751

00

00

20

1754

00

00

20

1752

00

04

16

1807

00

04

94

1808

00

03

05

1809

00

02

26

1670

00

01

25

1810

00

01

94

1811

00

02

29

1665

00

01

66

1812

00

04

02

1664

00

03

35

1650@5021

00

02

46

1654

00

01

21

1655

00

09

39

1645

00

00

93

1644

00

00

20

1643

00

00

20

1642

00

00

20

1641

00

00

20

1640

00

00

20

1656

00

08

33

1636

00

08

70

1635

00

00

82

1527

00

04

26

1526

00

00

20

1525

00

00

20

1528

00

18

30

1529

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3922

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1522

00

11

24

1519

00

05

89

1521

00

06

19

1520

00

04

03

723 ¼jkLrk½

723 ¼jkLrk½

723 ¼jkLrk½

723 ¼jkLrk½

723 ¼jkLrk½

00

0000

0000

05

0505

0505

82

8282

8282

1512

00

01

68

1437

00

00

20

1436

00

03

25

1511

00

05

18

1510

00

06

62

1469

00

00

20

1471

00

01

06

1472

00

02

14

1470

00

00

80

1499 ¼dPpk jkLrk½

1499 ¼dPpk jkLrk½

1499 ¼dPpk jkLrk½

1499 ¼dPpk jkLrk½

1499 ¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

0000

0000

01

0101

0101

70

7070

7070

1473

00

02

74

1464

00

03

01

1463

00

00

20

1474

00

02

20

1353

00

32

74

1375

00

02

12

1376

00

03

92

1377

00

00

74

1378

00

02

96

1373

00

03

25

1371

00

00

27

1372

00

02

22

1370

00

02

24

1367

00

02

87

1368

00

02

76

1369

00

05

07

1360

00

01

71

1359

00

03

75

1358

00

01

64

1357

00

00

20

1299

00

01

34

1300

00

01

81

1301

00

01

91

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3923

1302

00

00

71

1303

00

00

20

1305

00

00

20

1306

00

03

60

1352

00

01

44

1342

00

21

82

1341

00

04

71

1330

00

05

10

1333

00

10

24

¹iQk- la- vkj&25011@14@2013&vksvkj&Iº

iou oqQekj] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 27th July, 2013

S.O. 1536.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that a

pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited in Dist. Siwan in the State of Bihar for ‘Patna to Motihari and

Baitalpur Pipeline’ for the transportation of Petroleum Product;

And, whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary

to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which is described in the

Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals

Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention

to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on

which the copies of the notification issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of

India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the

pipeline under the land, to Shri Arun Kumar Jha B.A.S. & Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited. (Pipelines

Division) P.O. Dhelwan, Sipara, Dist. Patna (Bihar.) Pin – 800020.

SCHEDULE

Dist. : Siwan

State : Bihar

Mouja / Village

Survey/Block No.

Sub-Div-No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

BHIKHA BAN

28

00

10

03

Thana No-169

26

00

14

11

40

00

04

55

22(ROAD)

00

02

34

16

00

05

15

43

00

00

20

44

00

00

20

36

00

00

20

41

00

09

87

42

00

03

86

15

00

00

20

2331

00

01

38

2332(NADI)

00

03

57

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3924

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

DEURIYA

381(NADI)

00

03

25

Thana No. 153

382(ROAD)

00

01

36

379(ROAD)

00

00

20

384

00

00

38

387

00

00

20

378

00

04

12

377

00

00

20

371

00

05

35

373

00

00

20

372

00

00

20

370

00

01

03

369

00

02

82

368

00

03

42

366

00

00

25

367

00

07

41

8

00

00

20

9

00

00

20

10

00

00

53

11

00

00

81

12

00

03

00

13

00

10

22

364

00

00

20

16

00

00

20

17

00

00

20

15

00

00

20

20

00

09

28

21

00

00

20

22

00

00

20

19

00

01

32

18

00

00

32

24

00

02

40

25

00

02

16

26

00

02

66

29

00

00

85

30

00

00

20

1183(ROAD)

00

05

75

1251

00

08

37

1250

00

01

91

1249

00

00

20

1437

00

00

20

1436

00

00

20

1252

00

01

31

1253

00

04

26

1254

00

04

44

1266

00

07

42

1265

00

01

26

1267

00

02

45

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3925

1267/3930

00

01

24

1268

00

00

20

1281

00

01

96

1282

00

07

06

1311

00

05

50

1310

00

00

20

1312

00

02

98

1313

00

00

20

1314

00

04

92

1315

00

00

20

1317

00

00

78

1318

00

03

33

1323

00

07

74

1324/3931

00

00

20

1325

00

00

20

1329

00

00

34

1330

00

13

47

1332

00

03

50

1812

00

16

17

BISHUNPUR MAHUARI

2727

00

04

45

Thana No. 154

2728

00

06

28

2732

00

05

68

2729

00

00

20

2733

00

04

74

2731

00

00

20

2734

00

02

53

2735

00

00

20

2739

00

09

48

2738

00

10

40

2740

00

00

57

2737

00

02

39

2804

00

06

78

2831

00

01

91

2830

00

02

75

2826

00

03

44

2827

00

02

71

2828

00

02

53

2806

00

00

20

2825

00

00

20

2823

00

11

34

2822

00

01

82

2821

00

06

07

2819

00

04

82

2818

00

00

20

2820

00

00

20

2855

00

01

63

2817

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3926

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2816

00

01

73

2815

00

00

20

2813

00

00

20

2856

00

06

54

2857

00

03

71

2858

00

07

52

2859

00

00

20

2896

00

07

48

2895

00

05

21

2891

00

01

93

2892

00

00

20

2890

00

03

44

2889

00

03

87

2885

00

08

52

2882

00

03

27

2883

00

03

76

2881

00

05

54

2879

00

04

30

2930(ROAD)

00

02

35

1959

00

00

20

1954

00

21

47

1951

00

00

84

1955

00

08

32

1956

00

00

32

1949

00

03

00

1973

00

01

01

1948

00

18

55

1974

00

00

20

1947

00

04

76

1946

00

05

16

1945

00

03

70

1944

00

06

04

1943

00

04

81

1942

00

04

55

1941

00

04

44

1940

00

04

40

1938

00

05

02

1937

00

00

20

1933

00

13

46

1932

00

02

97

2917(ROAD)

00

06

85

1931

00

00

38

1863

00

00

20

1857

00

07

12

1856

00

01

25

1855

00

00

85

1844

00

00

38

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3927

1843

00

00

20

1751

00

00

85

1752

00

00

20

1750

00

01

83

1749

00

09

85

1748

00

01

52

SURBIR

213

00

18

25

Thana No. 152

214

00

04

82

215

00

01

57

821

00

00

20

820

00

00

20

819

00

01

43

815

00

05

01

814

00

03

63

816

00

00

20

813

00

00

20

812

00

09

53

808

00

00

20

811

00

02

45

809

00

02

81

810

00

00

20

837

00

00

66

836

00

00

20

835

00

00

20

838

00

03

09

839

00

03

62

840

00

01

86

841

00

00

26

855

00

00

20

856

00

28

94

976

00

00

20

858

00

00

25

859

00

00

20

857

00

00

73

865

00

04

16

964

00

00

20

866

00

04

25

974

00

01

28

973

00

01

62

971

00

00

37

972

00

03

01

970

00

00

45

968

00

04

49

965

00

00

73

966

00

01

10

963

00

03

50

962

00

02

00

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3928

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

961

00

00

20

960

00

00

63

993

00

02

80

992

00

02

22

994

00

03

26

995

00

01

03

997

00

00

94

996

00

00

20

998

00

00

91

1229

00

00

60

1228

00

02

79

996

00

00

20

1227

00

04

96

1226

00

07

42

1225

00

00

20

1221

00

03

63

1222

00

05

32

1225

00

00

20

1220

00

02

63

1022

00

00

20

1219

00

04

41

1218

00

01

64

1217

00

00

43

1216

00

05

36

1223

00

00

20

1207

00

00

20

1209

00

04

65

1210

00

03

92

1208

00

06

04

1211

00

14

44

1204

00

00

77

1199

00

00

71

1198

00

07

65

1190

00

08

03

1185

00

06

06

1179

00

03

53

1178

00

00

20

1176

00

00

20

1174

00

00

20

1173

00

00

20

1175

00

00

20

1171

00

09

46

1162

00

00

39

1160

00

00

20

1163

00

02

85

1164

00

00

20

1170

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3929

1159

00

04

79

1158

00

04

79

1041 (ROAD)

00

02

21

1125

00

00

20

1328

00

01

22

1329

00

05

25

1330

00

01

79

1331

00

00

94

1332

00

03

89

1333

00

00

28

1340

00

03

16

1342

00

02

12

1343

00

00

20

1341

00

01

77

1339

00

07

37

1345

00

00

20

1348

00

03

11

1347

00

00

20

1350

00

00

20

1524

00

00

20

1349

00

03

15

1523

00

02

45

1524

00

00

20

1522

00

03

14

1520

00

05

71

1415(CART TRACK)

00

01

89

1405

00

05

30

1366

00

00

61

1365

00

00

20

1404

00

14

11

1406

00

10

55

1414

00

00

20

1407

00

02

13

1408

00

02

45

1409

00

04

39

1401

00

04

58

1400

00

01

66

1397

00

01

32

1424

00

01

11

1426

00

03

70

1427

00

09

30

1428

00

05

04

1429

00

00

99

1430

00

02

98

1431

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3930

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ITHARI

772

00

14

69

Thana No. 145

773

00

00

20

808

00

05

15

809

00

00

20

807

00

11

09

806

00

08

02

805

00

06

28

804

00

07

23

651

00

01

94

650

00

04

02

649

00

09

32

648

00

04

36

647

00

02

17

813

00

03

34

634

00

00

20

635

00

00

20

814

00

25

45

815

00

11

96

615

00

04

84

614

00

00

20

816

00

00

20

620

00

01

16

619

00

00

90

616

00

04

87

618

00

01

77

617

00

00

93

395

00

07

18

394

00

18

97

396

00

00

20

397

00

00

20

398

00

00

20

399

00

00

20

400

00

00

20

401

00

01

52

402

00

00

74

403

00

00

20

404

00

00

20

405(NALA)

00

02

21

511

00

02

97

511/877

00

02

34

509(ROAD)

00

01

60

407

00

02

06

408

00

00

20

406

00

03

85

410

00

00

53

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3931

413

00

00

20

333

00

19

27

366

00

00

20

334

00

00

20

335

00

00

20

336

00

00

88

332

00

03

57

339

00

00

49

340

00

01

67

331

00

06

79

330/875

00

02

66

330

00

01

97

341

00

01

99

342

00

00

20

328

00

07

76

329

00

00

63

322

00

00

85

323

00

07

07

321

00

00

20

324

00

12

12

325

00

02

10

319(Field Channel)

00

01

10

316

00

05

28

307

00

03

96

315

00

08

12

309

00

00

20

310

00

02

82

311

00

03

28

312

00

13

24

HAHWA

1152(ROAD)

00

01

67

Thana No. 130

1151

00

03

22

1150

00

01

38

1147

00

01

75

1146

00

03

28

1145

00

04

80

1143

00

06

76

1142

00

09

23

1141(Field Channel)

00

00

79

1139

00

00

20

1138

00

05

53

1137

00

02

27

1126

00

00

20

1136

00

04

84

1134

00

29

31

1134/1483

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3932

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

JAGDISHPUR

286

00

04

84

Thana No. 129

285

00

00

20

288

00

02

26

287

00

06

89

283

00

03

00

291

00

00

20

315

00

00

51

281

00

01

57

316

00

00

64

314

00

00

20

250

00

01

61

317

00

14

07

249

00

00

26

318

00

00

45

324

00

00

25

325

00

00

20

326

00

00

65

332

00

07

30

334

00

00

20

336

00

00

20

331

00

00

54

333

00

01

02

337

00

03

27

330

00

00

20

342

00

03

27

338

00

00

47

340

00

00

54

341

00

00

57

506

00

02

26

507

00

02

41

509

00

02

72

510

00

00

42

512

00

02

78

508

00

00

20

528

00

00

20

527

00

04

67

526

00

00

20

537

00

00

20

529

00

00

20

535

00

03

81

536

00

00

99

539

00

03

44

540

00

01

95

542

00

02

07

543

00

02

97

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3933

534

00

02

17

544

00

04

15

550

00

03

11

551

00

03

26

556

00

03

94

555

00

00

20

552

00

00

20

554

00

00

20

557

00

03

98

559

00

00

20

558

00

03

83

564(ROAD)

00

03

05

856

00

09

67

857

00

00

81

858

00

03

34

859

00

01

87

862

00

00

20

860

00

05

13

890

00

00

31

861

00

04

96

889

00

02

17

863

00

04

18

880

00

03

32

881

00

05

89

885

00

00

25

882

00

01

67

886

00

00

20

884

00

03

73

883

00

05

42

RISAURA

4469

00

01

12

Thana No. 131

4468

00

00

20

4467

00

00

20

4425

00

01

50

4426

00

01

15

4427

00

01

91

4433

00

07

82

4432

00

00

20

4434

00

04

52

4436

00

06

96

4437

00

00

59

4438

00

01

26

4447

00

07

12

4448

00

09

79

4449

00

00

20

4450

00

09

48

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3934

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

4451

00

05

83

4452

00

03

92

4453

00

09

76

4356

00

00

20

4454

00

00

93

4520

00

01

53

4519

00

01

62

4518

00

00

20

4521

00

03

76

4522

00

06

86

4531

00

00

20

4523

00

00

20

4530

00

00

20

4524

00

00

53

4525

00

02

27

4526

00

04

07

4527

00

03

87

4528

00

02

69

4529

00

00

47

3553

00

03

75

3509

00

08

31

3552

00

00

20

3510

00

02

29

3551

00

00

20

3511

00

02

31

3512

00

02

21

3513

00

01

75

3514

00

01

48

3508

00

01

20

3515

00

00

46

3516

00

05

69

3497

00

00

20

3496

00

00

20

3517

00

03

04

3518

00

02

18

3520

00

00

20

3494

00

00

47

3493

00

01

81

3519

00

06

30

3492

00

01

80

3491

00

02

34

3207

00

00

61

3211

00

07

08

3208

00

00

22

3210

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3935

3217

00

18

75

3215

00

00

20

3216

00

00

44

3219

00

04

17

3228

00

14

38

3227

00

02

15

3226

00

00

28

3225

00

00

20

3103(ROAD)

00

01

66

3007

00

03

02

2995

00

01

86

2994

00

00

20

2993

00

00

20

3000

00

02

48

3001

00

00

20

2996

00

06

28

2997

00

00

20

2999

00

04

69

2998

00

02

24

2865(ROAD)

00

01

46

2965

00

05

08

2966

00

00

20

2963

00

00

20

2964

00

04

32

2963

00

02

49

2958

00

01

91

2957

00

01

55

2956

00

03

28

2904

00

00

20

2905

00

00

29

2906

00

00

83

2955

00

02

00

2907

00

01

11

2908

00

02

15

2953

00

00

45

2952

00

00

20

2951

00

00

20

2932

00

00

20

2900

00

00

20

2909

00

02

89

2910

00

01

47

2911

00

01

53

2912

00

04

45

2899

00

07

10

2913

00

01

26

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3936

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2914

00

00

20

2896

00

00

20

2897

00

01

49

2898

00

04

49

2831

00

03

22

2879

00

04

65

2878

00

00

26

2877

00

00

20

2834

00

00

20

2833

00

10

08

2832

00

02

07

2829

00

00

20

2836

00

04

13

2835

00

06

34

2787

00

08

63

2786

00

00

20

2788

00

01

91

2662

00

02

81

2665

00

02

76

2661

00

00

20

2666

00

03

03

2671

00

03

34

2670

00

00

20

2672

00

00

20

2673

00

03

73

2674

00

05

06

2637

00

02

73

2638

00

03

60

2639

00

00

29

2640

00

06

55

2641

00

01

00

AGEYAN

4450

00

06

57

Thana No. 113

4445

00

02

89

4449

00

00

20

4448

00

01

01

4451

00

04

72

4452

00

00

20

4454

00

13

87

4543

00

03

91

4542

00

00

20

4455

00

04

76

4456

00

00

20

4535

00

17

98

4540

00

00

20

4538

00

00

57

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3937

4539

00

00

20

4537

00

00

20

4536

00

04

57

4527

00

00

35

4528

00

04

39

4526

00

00

20

4529

00

00

82

4533

00

00

20

4530

00

04

11

4512

00

00

20

4531

00

00

49

4511

00

04

61

4510

00

00

20

4509

00

00

34

4507

00

02

11

4506

00

00

20

4505

00

00

20

4508

00

06

43

4495

00

01

42

3668(CART TRACK)

00

02

42

4598

00

00

20

4599

00

03

46

4600

00

04

15

4601

00

00

60

4602

00

04

93

4603

00

05

57

4611

00

00

20

4610

00

01

63

4609

00

08

16

4606

00

01

51

4607

00

00

20

4608

00

08

33

3666

00

00

80

3665

00

04

72

3664

00

00

20

3701

00

00

20

3702

00

05

94

3703

00

00

61

3704

00

07

31

3705

00

00

20

3709

00

00

72

3708

00

02

94

3707

00

00

20

3710

00

00

20

3491

00

04

34

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3938

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

3489

00

00

29

3490

00

04

41

3492

00

01

52

3493

00

03

40

3488

00

00

20

3494

00

06

68

3496

00

00

20

3487

00

01

66

3485

00

00

20

3486

00

02

42

3495

00

03

20

3469

00

07

20

3468

00

04

08

3470

00

00

20

3464

00

04

62

3465

00

00

53

3463

00

01

72

3454

00

09

43

3453

00

00

59

3452

00

07

91

3451

00

00

20

3450

00

01

82

3449

00

04

24

3455

00

00

20

3445

00

01

21

3448

00

04

09

3446

00

01

01

3447

00

03

04

3443

00

00

20

3442

00

07

59

3439

00

00

20

3440

00

02

97

3441

00

10

98

3395

00

00

20

3420

00

01

24

3401

00

00

20

3402

00

01

60

3403

00

03

52

3404

00

05

02

3405

00

03

46

3406

00

02

20

3407

00

00

20

3332

00

00

25

3331

00

05

51

3330

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3939

3329

00

06

43

3324

00

00

20

3328

00

05

38

3326

00

04

52

3325

00

01

28

2843(ROAD)

00

01

66

2618

00

00

20

2622

00

06

66

2620

00

01

91

2621

00

08

69

2590

00

02

78

2591

00

00

20

2589

00

01

60

2587

00

05

06

2588

00

04

67

2570

00

00

20

2578

00

07

23

2579

00

00

20

2577

00

03

71

2576

00

02

71

2531

00

06

44

2528

00

00

20

2532

00

01

93

2530

00

01

28

2524

00

01

07

2523

00

01

30

2520

00

00

63

2519

00

00

93

2533

00

01

56

1771

00

06

22

1743

00

00

41

1771/5002

00

00

75

1772

00

00

38

1773

00

00

56

1774

00

00

36

1775

00

00

37

1770

00

03

60

1769

00

00

88

1744

00

00

31

1767

00

02

63

1766

00

01

93

1765

00

00

20

1745

00

00

69

1746

00

00

93

1763

00

01

40

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3940

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1762

00

01

31

1761

00

01

20

1747

00

01

84

1748

00

03

22

1760

00

00

93

1758

00

00

56

1757

00

00

34

1753

00

05

40

1750

00

00

20

1751

00

00

20

1754

00

00

20

1752

00

04

16

1807

00

04

94

1808

00

03

05

1809

00

02

26

1670

00

01

25

1810

00

01

94

1811

00

02

29

1665

00

01

66

1812

00

04

02

1664

00

03

35

1650/5021

00

02

46

1654

00

01

21

1655

00

09

39

1645

00

00

93

1644

00

00

20

1643

00

00

20

1642

00

00

20

1641

00

00

20

1640

00

00

20

1656

00

08

33

1636

00

08

70

1635

00

00

82

1527

00

04

26

1526

00

00

20

1525

00

00

20

1528

00

18

30

1529

00

00

20

1522

00

11

24

1519

00

05

89

1521

00

06

19

1520

00

04

03

723(ROAD)

00

05

82

1512

00

01

68

1437

00

00

20

1436

00

03

25

1511

00

05

18

1510

00

06

62

1469

00

00

20

1471

00

01

06

1472

00

02

14

1470

00

00

80

1499(Cart Track)

00

01

70

1473

00

02

74

1464

00

03

01

1463

00

00

20

1474

00

02

20

1353

00

32

74

1375

00

02

12

1376

00

03

92

1377

00

00

74

1378

00

02

96

1373

00

03

25

1371

00

00

27

1372

00

02

22

1370

00

02

24

1367

00

02

87

1368

00

02

76

1369

00

05

07

1360

00

01

71

1359

00

03

75

1358

00

01

64

1357

00

00

20

1299

00

01

34

1300

00

01

81

1301

00

01

91

1302

00

00

71

1303

00

00

20

1305

00

00

20

1306

00

03

60

1352

00

01

44

1342

00

21

82

1341

00

04

71

1330

00

05

10

1333

00

10

24

[F. No. R-25011/14/2013-OR-I]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3941

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

ubZ fnYyh] 27 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1537-—dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slk izrhr gksrk gS fd yksd fgr esa ;g vko';d gS fd iVuk ls eksfrgkjh vkSj csrkyiqj rd

isVªksfy;e inkFkksZ ds ifjogu gsrq ftyk lkju] jkT; fcgkj esa bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkuh pkfg, A

vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slh ikbiykbu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, vko';d izrhr gksrk gS fd ml Hkwfe esa ftlds Hkhrj mDr

ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkus dk izLrko gS vkSj tks bl vf/lwpuk ls layXu vuqlwfp esa o£.kr gS] mi;ksx dk vtZu fd;k tk,_

vr% vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] iSVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbUl (Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/dkj dk vtZu) vf/fu;e] 1962 (1962

dk 50) dh /kkjk 3 dh mi&/kjk (1) }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] mDr Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/dkj dk vtZu djus ds vius

vk'k; dh ?kks"k.kk djrh gSA

dksbZ O;fDr] tks mDr vuqlwfp esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa fgrc¼ gS] ml rkjh[k ls ftldks] Hkkjr ds jkti=k esa ;Fkk izdkf'kr bl

vfèklwpuk dh izfr;ka lk/kj.k turk dks miyC/ djk nh tkrh gS] bDdhl fnu ds vUnj] Hkwfe ds Hkhrj ikbiykbu fcNk, tkus gsrq mi;ksx

ds vf/dkj ds vtZu ds fy,] Jh v:.k dqekj >k] fc-iz-ls- o l{ke izkf/dkjh bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM] (ikbiykbu fMohtu)

iVuk] iks-vks- <syok] flikjk] ftyk iVuk] fiu% 800020] fcgkj dks fyf[kr :i eas vk{ksi Hkst ldsxkA

vuqlwph

ftyk % lkju

jkT; % fcgkj

ekStk@xzke

losZ@Cykd@la- (IyksV la-)

lc&Mho&la-

{ks=kiQy

gsDVs;j

vkjs

oxZ ehVj

1

2

3

4

5

6

djuiqjk

djuiqjk

djuiqjk

djuiqjk

djuiqjk

3217

00

03

23

Fkkuk uacj % 85

Fkkuk uacj % 85

Fkkuk uacj % 85

Fkkuk uacj % 85

Fkkuk uacj % 85

3216

00

01

42

3215

00

00

60

3209

00

04

55

3210

00

04

54

3211

00

08

36

3212

00

03

58

3213

00

00

20

3207

00

00

20

2343&dPpk jkLrk

00

00

88

2134

00

00

98

2131

00

00

20

2135

00

14

28

2136

00

01

46

2150

00

01

26

2149

00

03

18

2148

00

02

79

2146

00

01

57

2145

00

00

20

2147

00

00

20

2161

00

05

61

3942

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3943

2162

00

00

20

2160

00

03

90

2163

00

02

28

2159

00

00

80

2164

00

06

96

2165

00

07

67

2158

00

00

20

2106

00

02

90

2166&dPpk jkLrk

00

01

70

2176

00

00

20

2177

00

02

44

2193

00

02

16

2194

00

06

67

2196

00

00

67

2195

00

00

20

2197

00

01

60

2198

00

00

82

2192

00

00

20

2199

00

04

52

2206

00

02

09

2200

00

00

48

2205

00

04

94

2207

00

05

49

2214

00

00

20

2212

00

00

64

2213

00

05

22

2218

00

05

91

2217

00

00

20

2223

00

01

04

2224

00

05

59

2225

00

00

20

2046&dPpk jkLrk

00

00

72

1393

00

00

20

1391

00

11

50

1390

00

01

81

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3944

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1360

00

00

04

1389

00

05

16

1388

00

05

93

1383

00

00

22

1386

00

00

22

1387

00

00

20

1385

00

02

61

1384

00

03

54

1377

00

00

20

1378

00

00

20

1514

00

01

51

1466

00

01

18

1513

00

03

66

1512

00

11

05

1511

00

12

06

1510

00

01

03

1521

00

00

20

1491

00

01

20

1509

00

03

08

1508

00

05

04

1501

00

03

99

1505

00

00

20

1500

00

00

73

1499

00

03

14

1498

00

02

32

1502

00

00

20

1497

00

00

77

1526

00

19

12

1547&jkLrk

00

02

19

3227&dsuky

00

06

66

1564

00

04

97

jkeiqj

jkeiqj

jkeiqj

jkeiqj

jkeiqj

561

00

05

37

Fkkuk uacj % 87

Fkkuk uacj % 87

Fkkuk uacj % 87

Fkkuk uacj % 87

Fkkuk uacj % 87

563

00

12

44

565

00

00

18

566

00

15

93

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3945

623

00

03

48

596

00

07

40

622

00

03

01

595@719

00

04

26

597

00

05

97

617&dPpk jkLrk

00

00

20

620

00

00

20

600

00

00

20

601

00

09

75

602&dPpk jkLrk

00

01

21

ydr Nkijk

ydr Nkijk

ydr Nkijk

ydr Nkijk

ydr Nkijk

1899 ¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

00

90

Fkkuk uacj % 89

Fkkuk uacj % 89

Fkkuk uacj % 89

Fkkuk uacj % 89

Fkkuk uacj % 89

1508

00

00

38

1509

00

08

74

1510

00

03

12

1519

00

02

03

1520

00

05

87

1518

00

08

39

1515

00

00

20

1517

00

02

84

1521

00

01

22

1596

00

04

87

1525

00

01

76

1524

00

00

20

1526

00

07

08

1527

00

03

33

1528

00

00

20

1591

00

03

38

1589

00

02

17

1592

00

00

20

1587

00

00

40

1590

00

05

13

1588

00

03

36

1581

00

00

97

1609

00

03

25

1610

00

04

84

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3946

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1611

00

05

61

1612

00

04

09

1613

00

03

74

1614

00

04

09

1615

00

00

20

1677

00

00

25

1675

00

09

92

1674

00

01

38

1628

00

01

40

1629

00

06

30

1630

00

03

58

1633

00

00

20

1634

00

00

20

1631

00

00

62

1632

00

08

99

1645

00

00

21

1643

00

05

75

1642

00

00

69

1644

00

06

87

1646

00

06

30

1647

00

03

80

1649

00

00

59

1648

00

01

72

1404

00

00

20

1403

00

00

20

1390

00

04

77

1391

00

05

91

1393

00

01

45

1392

00

00

20

1388

00

00

33

1389

00

00

20

1386

00

00

20

1387

00

00

47

1385

00

00

74

1384&jkLrk

00

02

06

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3947

1379

00

00

20

1383

00

01

42

1380

00

08

73

1381

00

05

07

1368

00

02

35

1369

00

00

20

1367

00

00

38

1366

00

03

29

1363

00

02

85

1365

00

04

75

1364

00

00

20

465

00

03

21

466

00

10

58

469

00

02

19

494

00

05

82

495

00

01

61

493

00

05

83

492

00

00

20

516

00

00

20

491

00

02

73

490

00

03

04

489

00

00

63

488

00

00

20

517

00

01

87

518

00

06

44

524

00

00

20

519

00

05

30

521

00

08

39

520

00

00

20

522

00

06

40

523

00

01

33

535

00

01

56

534

00

00

20

252&fQYM psuy

00

01

63

562

00

00

46

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3948

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

564

00

00

20

563

00

05

36

566

00

02

26

567

00

00

20

565

00

02

94

570

00

02

44

569

00

00

20

571

00

09

92

591

00

00

20

572

00

02

94

590

00

08

34

589

00

00

20

586

00

06

91

587

00

04

46

/kkuk Mhg

/kkuk Mhg

/kkuk Mhg

/kkuk Mhg

/kkuk Mhg

277

00

08

80

Fkkuk uacj % 95

Fkkuk uacj % 95

Fkkuk uacj % 95

Fkkuk uacj % 95

Fkkuk uacj % 95

271

00

00

07

278

00

15

89

288

00

00

20

286

00

03

62

282

00

01

42

283

00

01

21

284

00

01

76

285

00

01

43

262

00

06

54

243

00

02

53

242

00

00

10

244

00

04

84

245

00

02

72

249

00

00

31

240

00

00

46

239

00

03

83

248

00

00

20

238

00

02

60

236

00

03

00

231

00

00

48

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3949

305

00

00

20

230

00

03

93

229

00

01

33

228

00

01

17

227

00

01

22

226

00

05

83

211

00

05

17

212

00

03

61

213

00

00

97

204&jkLrk

00

02

05

205

00

00

72

206

00

00

20

166

00

00

20

167

00

00

82

168

00

06

78

193

00

01

42

192

00

01

18

191

00

01

30

190

00

01

52

189

00

01

60

188

00

04

94

171

00

01

35

172

00

00

14

176

00

02

78

185

00

00

20

177

00

05

12

182

00

01

38

183

00

00

20

181

00

02

57

180

00

01

27

179

00

00

20

184&jkLrk

00

01

31

ikujs ds Hkqbu

ikujs ds Hkqbu

ikujs ds Hkqbu

ikujs ds Hkqbu

ikujs ds Hkqbu

216&jkLrk

00

01

29

Fkkuk uacj&93

Fkkuk uacj&93

Fkkuk uacj&93

Fkkuk uacj&93

Fkkuk uacj&93

54

00

02

14

55

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3950

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

56

00

00

20

53

00

03

25

58

00

04

60

60

00

00

20

59

00

00

20

63

00

02

29

64

00

00

61

65

00

01

41

71

00

00

21

70

00

04

11

72

00

00

20

79

00

00

20

73

00

02

18

78

00

01

45

77

00

00

86

80

00

02

20

82

00

00

29

83

00

02

94

84

00

04

19

85

00

00

20

86

00

00

99

87

00

02

25

88

00

02

89

89

00

10

90

26

00

08

91

33

00

00

20

25

00

06

27

19

00

10

45

21

00

02

55

22

00

00

20

20

00

07

19

4

00

03

10

3

00

00

20

jlqyiqj

jlqyiqj

jlqyiqj

jlqyiqj

jlqyiqj

1874

00

18

32

Fkkuk uacj % 99

Fkkuk uacj % 99

Fkkuk uacj % 99

Fkkuk uacj % 99

Fkkuk uacj % 99

1512

00

00

98

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3951

1511

00

00

20

1528&ukyk

00

01

40

1559

00

02

72

1560

00

03

33

1561

00

06

13

1558

00

00

90

1562

00

07

44

1563

00

03

78

1556

00

00

20

1564

00

02

97

1565

00

00

20

1555

00

00

90

1554

00

09

67

1553

00

05

10

1550

00

01

15

1551

00

07

37

1552

00

00

20

1599

00

00

75

1598

00

00

20

1600

00

01

37

1601

00

01

44

1602

00

00

40

1597

00

00

68

1596

00

03

10

1592

00

00

54

1595

00

03

49

1594

00

02

15

1593

00

01

84

1603

00

02

34

1604

00

05

18

1605

00

01

47

1608

00

00

94

1611

00

00

23

1610

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3952

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1622

00

02

73

1623

00

00

75

1628

00

00

20

1612

00

08

29

1613

00

01

01

1614

00

01

14

1615

00

00

20

1750

00

00

20

1749

00

05

24

1751

00

00

44

1752

00

00

26

1753

00

00

20

1748

00

06

39

1754

00

03

34

1744

00

00

40

1745

00

04

22

1755

00

00

20

1286&jkLrk

00

03

08

1038

00

00

20

1040

00

02

28

1041

00

03

52

1042

00

04

37

1043

00

08

43

1050

00

00

20

1044

00

01

76

1049

00

06

83

1048

00

02

88

1057

00

00

20

1047

00

02

81

1027

00

04

21

1026

00

04

08

1136

00

07

04

1010

00

00

20

1011

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3953

1135

00

00

35

1009

00

05

85

1008

00

01

79

1137

00

00

20

1138

00

03

00

1140

00

02

62

1007

00

00

20

1142

00

01

54

1141

00

00

99

1143

00

04

76

1149

00

03

06

1145

00

00

20

1148

00

01

40

1150

00

02

25

1147

00

02

50

1152

00

07

76

1153

00

01

25

1156

00

00

23

1208

00

01

08

1203

00

07

78

1157

00

00

20

1204

00

03

71

1200

00

05

01

1199

00

02

68

1198

00

03

26

1197

00

02

37

1194

00

01

16

1195

00

00

51

1186

00

00

20

1185

00

00

20

1184

00

00

20

1183

00

00

20

1196

00

06

59

1182

00

02

50

1181

00

02

63

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3954

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1180

00

02

45

1179

00

03

76

1175

00

03

90

1176

00

00

20

1174

00

03

49

1166

00

00

20

vklguh

vklguh

vklguh

vklguh

vklguh

4868

00

00

26

Fkkuk uacj % 7

Fkkuk uacj % 7

Fkkuk uacj % 7

Fkkuk uacj % 7

Fkkuk uacj % 7

4867

00

01

37

4866

00

01

21

4865

00

02

02

4862

00

00

50

4861

00

00

20

4864

00

04

84

4610

00

00

20

4863

00

01

79

4860

00

01

24

4859

00

03

24

4611

00

00

31

4612

00

00

20

4857

00

00

52

4858

00

03

80

4613

00

00

20

4855

00

01

36

4615

00

01

61

4853

00

00

20

4854

00

00

22

4616

00

03

67

4618

00

03

70

4617

00

06

50

4619

00

05

14

4342

00

23

12

4344

00

06

46

4345

00

00

20

4350

00

05

00

4349

00

01

52

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3955

4348

00

00

20

4351

00

04

20

4352

00

00

90

4353

00

07

44

4339&dPpk jkLrk

00

02

33

4338

00

01

41

4209

00

04

84

4210

00

05

64

4211

00

02

06

4212

00

00

23

4208

00

04

50

4207

00

00

20

4225&dPpk jkLrk

00

03

86

4213

00

00

20

4214

00

05

23

4215

00

02

78

4216

00

07

28

4221

00

01

27

4220

00

05

34

4217

00

00

20

4219

00

05

97

4229

00

00

20

4270

00

14

58

4268&jkLrk

00

02

64

4267

00

01

78

4266

00

00

20

4265

00

02

44

4264

00

01

76

4263

00

02

00

4262

00

01

48

4261

00

01

62

4260

00

04

79

4259

00

02

11

4258

00

01

32

4257

00

00

50

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3956

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

4256

00

05

73

4255

00

02

13

vrkjlu

vrkjlu

vrkjlu

vrkjlu

vrkjlu

4805

00

10

25

Fkkuk uacj % 6

Fkkuk uacj % 6

Fkkuk uacj % 6

Fkkuk uacj % 6

Fkkuk uacj % 6

4806

00

00

20

4802

00

01

27

4804&dPpk jkLrk

00

07

61

3912

00

00

41

3913

00

03

72

3914

00

02

49

3915

00

05

64

3911

00

00

20

3916

00

00

82

3910

00

03

14

3906

00

19

36

3907

00

00

20

3905

00

04

71

3918

00

00

20

3920

00

00

20

3903

00

01

87

3904

00

06

73

3923

00

01

85

3900

00

00

72

3899

00

25

54

3898

00

11

90

3961

00

07

73

3881

00

01

64

3880

00

11

76

3879

00

00

56

3882

00

06

86

3878

00

04

92

3872

00

05

13

3873

00

02

70

3869

00

06

29

3874

00

00

20

3862

00

16

75

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3957

3863

00

00

20

3847

00

00

20

3854

00

06

69

3853

00

12

49

vVMhyk

vVMhyk

vVMhyk

vVMhyk

vVMhyk

35

00

05

64

Fkkuk uacj % 101

Fkkuk uacj % 101

Fkkuk uacj % 101

Fkkuk uacj % 101

Fkkuk uacj % 101

34

00

00

30

31

00

02

79

36

00

00

20

30

00

10

76

41

00

00

20

29

00

04

31

28

00

04

45

25

00

06

24

26

00

01

98

23

00

05

31

22

00

05

11

21

00

04

89

20

00

00

20

19

00

03

78

18

00

06

40

17

00

06

49

14

00

02

61

13

00

01

03

11

00

00

20

10

00

00

20

NijkbFkh

NijkbFkh

NijkbFkh

NijkbFkh

NijkbFkh

541&ukyk

00

02

40

Fkkuk uacj % 102

Fkkuk uacj % 102

Fkkuk uacj % 102

Fkkuk uacj % 102

Fkkuk uacj % 102

542&ukyk

00

03

34

571

00

00

20

572

00

00

20

574

00

00

60

575

00

02

52

576

00

03

89

579

00

07

30

538

00

03

74

537

00

03

70

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3958

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

536

00

03

62

535

00

03

67

336

00

00

20

335

00

04

24

334

00

04

90

333

00

13

49

326

00

00

20

328

00

02

77

327

00

00

25

329

00

06

89

318

00

01

76

319

00

00

20

317

00

07

57

316

00

12

34

315

00

04

02

167

00

13

87

168

00

04

08

169

00

01

17

188

00

01

12

189

00

00

20

182

00

00

20

183

00

00

73

184

00

03

16

185

00

00

20

187

00

04

01

190

00

05

44

191

00

06

23

197

00

00

20

192

00

00

20

194

00

00

22

195

00

01

37

196

00

05

81

201

00

00

35

127

00

00

20

126

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3959

200

00

00

20

107

00

03

65

106

00

09

53

104

00

06

25

103

00

00

20

98

00

03

37

99

00

00

20

96

00

00

20

97&jkLrk

00

00

93

105&jkLrk

00

00

49

111&jkLrk

00

00

59

¹iQk- la- vkj&25011@21@2013&vksvkj&Iº

iou oqQekj] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 27th July, 2013

S.O. 1537.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that a

pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited in Dist. Saran in the State of Bihar for ‘Patna to Motihari and

Baitalpur Pipeline’ for the transportation of Petroleum Product;

And, whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary

to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which is described in the

Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals

Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention

to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on

which the copies of the notification issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of

India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the

pipeline under the land, to Shri Arun Kumar Jha B.A.S. & Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited. (Pipelines

Division) P.O. Dhelwan, Sipara, Dist. Patna (Bihar.) Pin – 800020.

SCHEDULE

Dist.: Saran

State : Bihar

Mouja / Village

Survey/Block No.

Sub-Div-No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

KARANPURA

3217

00

03

23

Thana Number : 85

3216

00

01

42

3215

00

00

60

3209

00

04

55

3210

00

04

54

3211

00

08

36

3212

00

03

58

3213

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3960

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

3207

00

00

20

2343-cart track

00

00

88

2134

00

00

98

2131

00

00

20

2135

00

14

28

2136

00

01

46

2150

00

01

26

2149

00

03

18

2148

00

02

79

2146

00

01

57

2145

00

00

20

2147

00

00

20

2161

00

05

61

2162

00

00

20

2160

00

03

90

2163

00

02

28

2159

00

00

80

2164

00

06

96

2165

00

07

67

2158

00

00

20

2106

00

02

90

2166-cart track

00

01

70

2176

00

00

20

2177

00

02

44

2193

00

02

16

2194

00

06

67

2196

00

00

67

2195

00

00

20

2197

00

01

60

2198

00

00

82

2192

00

00

20

2199

00

04

52

2206

00

02

09

2200

00

00

48

2205

00

04

94

2207

00

05

49

2214

00

00

20

2212

00

00

64

2213

00

05

22

2218

00

05

91

2217

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3961

2223

00

01

04

2224

00

05

59

2225

00

00

20

2046-cart track

00

00

72

1393

00

00

20

1391

00

11

50

1390

00

01

81

1360

00

00

04

1389

00

05

16

1388

00

05

93

1383

00

00

22

1386

00

00

22

1387

00

00

20

1385

00

02

61

1384

00

03

54

1377

00

00

20

1378

00

00

20

1514

00

01

51

1466

00

01

18

1513

00

03

66

1512

00

11

05

1511

00

12

06

1510

00

01

03

1521

00

00

20

1491

00

01

20

1509

00

03

08

1508

00

05

04

1501

00

03

99

1505

00

00

20

1500

00

00

73

1499

00

03

14

1498

00

02

32

1502

00

00

20

1497

00

00

77

1526

00

19

12

1547-Road

00

02

19

3227-Canal

00

06

66

1564

00

04

97

RAMPUR

561

00

05

37

Thana Number : 87

563

00

12

44

565

00

00

18

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3962

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

566

00

15

93

623

00

03

48

596

00

07

40

622

00

03

01

595/719

00

04

26

597

00

05

97

617-Cart track

00

00

20

620

00

00

20

600

00

00

20

601

00

09

75

602-Cart track

00

01

21

LAKAT

1899-Cart track

00

00

90

CHHAPRA

1508

00

00

38

Thana Number : 89

1509

00

08

74

1510

00

03

12

1519

00

02

03

1520

00

05

87

1518

00

08

39

1515

00

00

20

1517

00

02

84

1521

00

01

22

1596

00

04

87

1525

00

01

76

1524

00

00

20

1526

00

07

08

1527

00

03

33

1528

00

00

20

1591

00

03

38

1589

00

02

17

1592

00

00

20

1587

00

00

40

1590

00

05

13

1588

00

03

36

1581

00

00

97

1609

00

03

25

1610

00

04

84

1611

00

05

61

1612

00

04

09

1613

00

03

74

1614

00

04

09

1615

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3963

1677

00

00

25

1675

00

09

92

1674

00

01

38

1628

00

01

40

1629

00

06

30

1630

00

03

58

1633

00

00

20

1634

00

00

20

1631

00

00

62

1632

00

08

99

1645

00

00

21

1643

00

05

75

1642

00

00

69

1644

00

06

87

1646

00

06

30

1647

00

03

80

1649

00

00

59

1648

00

01

72

1404

00

00

20

1403

00

00

20

1390

00

04

77

1391

00

05

91

1393

00

01

45

1392

00

00

20

1388

00

00

33

1389

00

00

20

1386

00

00

20

1387

00

00

47

1385

00

00

74

1384-Road

00

02

06

1379

00

00

20

1383

00

01

42

1380

00

08

73

1381

00

05

07

1368

00

02

35

1369

00

00

20

1367

00

00

38

1366

00

03

29

1363

00

02

85

1365

00

04

75

1364

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3964

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

465

00

03

21

466

00

10

58

469

00

02

19

494

00

05

82

495

00

01

61

493

00

05

83

492

00

00

20

516

00

00

20

491

00

02

73

490

00

03

04

489

00

00

63

488

00

00

20

517

00

01

87

518

00

06

44

524

00

00

20

519

00

05

30

521

00

08

39

520

00

00

20

522

00

06

40

523

00

01

33

535

00

01

56

534

00

00

20

252-Field Channel

00

01

63

562

00

00

46

564

00

00

20

563

00

05

36

566

00

02

26

567

00

00

20

565

00

02

94

570

00

02

44

569

00

00

20

571

00

09

92

591

00

00

20

572

00

02

94

590

00

08

34

589

00

00

20

586

00

06

91

587

00

04

46

DHANA DIH

277

00

08

80

Thana Number : 95

271

00

00

07

278

00

15

89

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3965

288

00

00

20

286

00

03

62

282

00

01

42

283

00

01

21

284

00

01

76

285

00

01

43

262

00

06

54

243

00

02

53

242

00

00

10

244

00

04

84

245

00

02

72

249

00

00

31

240

00

00

46

239

00

03

83

248

00

00

20

238

00

02

60

236

00

03

00

231

00

00

48

305

00

00

20

230

00

03

93

229

00

01

33

228

00

01

17

227

00

01

22

226

00

05

83

211

00

05

17

212

00

03

61

213

00

00

97

204-Road

00

02

05

205

00

00

72

206

00

00

20

166

00

00

20

167

00

00

82

168

00

06

78

193

00

01

42

192

00

01

18

191

00

01

30

190

00

01

52

189

00

01

60

188

00

04

94

171

00

01

35

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3966

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

172

00

00

14

176

00

02

78

185

00

00

20

177

00

05

12

182

00

01

38

183

00

00

20

181

00

02

57

180

00

01

27

179

00

00

20

184-Road

00

01

31

PANRE KE

216-Road

00

01

29

BHUIN

54

00

02

14

55

00

00

20

Thana Number : 93

56

00

00

20

53

00

03

25

58

00

04

60

60

00

00

20

59

00

00

20

63

00

02

29

64

00

00

61

65

00

01

41

71

00

00

21

70

00

04

11

72

00

00

20

79

00

00

20

73

00

02

18

78

00

01

45

77

00

00

86

80

00

02

20

82

00

00

29

83

00

02

94

84

00

04

19

85

00

00

20

86

00

00

99

87

00

02

25

88

00

02

89

89

00

10

90

26

00

08

91

33

00

00

20

25

00

06

27

19

00

10

45

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3967

21

00

02

55

22

00

00

20

20

00

07

19

4

00

03

10

3

00

00

20

RASULPUR

1874

00

18

32

Thana Number : 99

1512

00

00

98

1511

00

00

20

1528-Nala

00

01

40

1559

00

02

72

1560

00

03

33

1561

00

06

13

1558

00

00

90

1562

00

07

44

1563

00

03

78

1556

00

00

20

1564

00

02

97

1565

00

00

20

1555

00

00

90

1554

00

09

67

1553

00

05

10

1550

00

01

15

1551

00

07

37

1552

00

00

20

1599

00

00

75

1598

00

00

20

1600

00

01

37

1601

00

01

44

1602

00

00

40

1597

00

00

68

1596

00

03

10

1592

00

00

54

1595

00

03

49

1594

00

02

15

1593

00

01

84

1603

00

02

34

1604

00

05

18

1605

00

01

47

1608

00

00

94

1611

00

00

23

1610

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3968

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1622

00

02

73

1623

00

00

75

1628

00

00

20

1612

00

08

29

1613

00

01

01

1614

00

01

14

1615

00

00

20

1750

00

00

20

1749

00

05

24

1751

00

00

44

1752

00

00

26

1753

00

00

20

1748

00

06

39

1754

00

03

34

1744

00

00

40

1745

00

04

22

1755

00

00

20

1286-Road

00

03

08

1038

00

00

20

1040

00

02

28

1041

00

03

52

1042

00

04

37

1043

00

08

43

1050

00

00

20

1044

00

01

76

1049

00

06

83

1048

00

02

88

1057

00

00

20

1047

00

02

81

1027

00

04

21

1026

00

04

08

1136

00

07

04

1010

00

00

20

1011

00

00

20

1135

00

00

35

1009

00

05

85

1008

00

01

79

1137

00

00

20

1138

00

03

00

1140

00

02

62

1007

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3969

1142

00

01

54

1141

00

00

99

1143

00

04

76

1149

00

03

06

1145

00

00

20

1148

00

01

40

1150

00

02

25

1147

00

02

50

1152

00

07

76

1153

00

01

25

1156

00

00

23

1208

00

01

08

1203

00

07

78

1157

00

00

20

1204

00

03

71

1200

00

05

01

1199

00

02

68

1198

00

03

26

1197

00

02

37

1194

00

01

16

1195

00

00

51

1186

00

00

20

1185

00

00

20

1184

00

00

20

1183

00

00

20

1196

00

06

59

1182

00

02

50

1181

00

02

63

1180

00

02

45

1179

00

03

76

1175

00

03

90

1176

00

00

20

1174

00

03

49

1166

00

00

20

ASAHNI

4868

00

00

26

Thana Number : 07

4867

00

01

37

4866

00

01

21

4865

00

02

02

4862

00

00

50

4861

00

00

20

4864

00

04

84

4610

00

00

20

4863

00

01

79

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3970

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

4860

00

01

24

4859

00

03

24

4611

00

00

31

4612

00

00

20

4857

00

00

52

4858

00

03

80

4613

00

00

20

4855

00

01

36

4615

00

01

61

4853

00

00

20

4854

00

00

22

4616

00

03

67

4618

00

03

70

4617

00

06

50

4619

00

05

14

4342

00

23

12

4344

00

06

46

4345

00

00

20

4350

00

05

00

4349

00

01

52

4348

00

00

20

4351

00

04

20

4352

00

00

90

4353

00

07

44

4339-cart track

00

02

33

4338

00

01

41

4209

00

04

84

4210

00

05

64

4211

00

02

06

4212

00

00

23

4208

00

04

50

4207

00

00

20

4225- CT

00

03

86

4213

00

00

20

4214

00

05

23

4215

00

02

78

4216

00

07

28

4221

00

01

27

4220

00

05

34

4217

00

00

20

4219

00

05

97

4229

00

00

20

4270

00

14

58

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3971

4268-Road

00

02

64

4267

00

01

78

4266

00

00

20

4265

00

02

44

4264

00

01

76

4263

00

02

00

4262

00

01

48

4261

00

01

62

4260

00

04

79

4259

00

02

11

4258

00

01

32

4257

00

00

50

4256

00

05

73

4255

00

02

13

ATARSAN

4805

00

10

25

Thana Number : 06

4806

00

00

20

4802

00

01

27

4804-cart track

00

07

61

3912

00

00

41

3913

00

03

72

3914

00

02

49

3915

00

05

64

3911

00

00

20

3916

00

00

82

3910

00

03

14

3906

00

19

36

3907

00

00

20

3905

00

04

71

3918

00

00

20

3920

00

00

20

3903

00

01

87

3904

00

06

73

3923

00

01

85

3900

00

00

72

3899

00

25

54

3898

00

11

90

3961

00

07

73

3881

00

01

64

3880

00

11

76

3879

00

00

56

3882

00

06

86

3878

00

04

92

3872

00

05

13

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3972

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

3873

00

02

70

3869

00

06

29

3874

00

00

20

3862

00

16

75

3863

00

00

20

3847

00

00

20

3854

00

06

69

3853

00

12

49

ATDILA

35

00

05

64

Thana Number :

34

00

00

30

101

31

00

02

79

36

00

00

20

30

00

10

76

41

00

00

20

29

00

04

31

28

00

04

45

25

00

06

24

26

00

01

98

23

00

05

31

22

00

05

11

21

00

04

89

20

00

00

20

19

00

03

78

18

00

06

40

17

00

06

49

14

00

02

61

13

00

01

03

11

00

00

20

10

00

00

20

CHAPRAITHI

541-Nala

00

02

40

Thana Number :

542-Nala

00

03

34

102

571

00

00

20

572

00

00

20

574

00

00

60

575

00

02

52

576

00

03

89

579

00

07

30

538

00

03

74

537

00

03

70

536

00

03

62

535

00

03

67

336

00

00

20

335

00

04

24

334

00

04

90

333

00

13

49

326

00

00

20

328

00

02

77

327

00

00

25

329

00

06

89

318

00

01

76

319

00

00

20

317

00

07

57

316

00

12

34

315

00

04

02

167

00

13

87

168

00

04

08

169

00

01

17

188

00

01

12

189

00

00

20

182

00

00

20

183

00

00

73

184

00

03

16

185

00

00

20

187

00

04

01

190

00

05

44

191

00

06

23

197

00

00

20

192

00

00

20

194

00

00

22

195

00

01

37

196

00

05

81

201

00

00

35

127

00

00

20

126

00

00

20

200

00

00

20

107

00

03

65

106

00

09

53

104

00

06

25

103

00

00

20

98

00

03

37

99

00

00

20

96

00

00

20

97-Road

00

00

93

105-Road

00

00

49

111-Road

00

00

59

[F. No. R-25011/21/2013-OR-I]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3973

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

ubZ fnYyh] 27 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1538-—dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slk izrhr gksrk gS fd yksd fgr esa ;g vko';d gS fd iVuk ls eksfrgkjh vkSj csrkyiqj

rd isVªksfy;e inkFkks± ds ifjogu gsrq ftyk lkju] jkT; fcgkj esa bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkuh pkfg, A

vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slh ikbiykbu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, vko';d izrhr gksrk gS fd ml Hkwfe esa ftlds Hkhrj mDr

ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkus dk izLrko gS vkSj tks bl vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa of.kZr gS] mi;ksx dk vtZu fd;k tk,_

vr%] vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbUl (Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/dkj dk vtZu) vf/fu;e] 1962 (1962

dk 50) dh /kjk 3 dh mi/kjk (1) }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] mDr Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/dkj dk vtZu djus ds vius

vk'k; dh ?kks"k.kk djrh gSA

dksbZ O;fDr] tks mDr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa fgrc¼ gS] ml rkjh[k ls ftldks] Hkkjr ds jkti=k esa ;Fkk izdkf'kr bl

vfèklwpuk dh izfr;ka lk/kj.k turk dks miyC/ djk nh tkrh gS] bDdhl fnu ds vUnj] Hkwfe ds Hkhrj ikbiykbu fcNk, tkus gsrq mi;ksx

ds vf/dkj ds vtZu ds fy,] Jh v:.k dqekj >k] fc-iz-ls- o l{ke izkf/dkjh bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM] (ikbiykbu fMohtu)

iVuk] iks-vks- <syok] flikjk] ftyk iVuk] fiu% 800020] fcgkj dks fyf[kr :i eas vk{ksi Hkst ldsxkA

vuqlwph

ftyk % lkju

jkT; % fcgkj

ekStk@xzke

losZ@Cykd@la- (IyksV la-)

lc&Mho&la-

{ks=kiQy

gsDVs;j

vkjs

oxZ ehVj

1

2

3

4

5

6

nkmniqj

1(dsuky)

00

02

58

Fkkuk uacj&155

223

00

00

20

222

00

02

30

220

00

03

87

221

00

01

02

227

00

00

20

219

00

03

80

218

00

09

22

216

00

00

20

217

00

02

26

206

00

00

20

194

00

05

30

198

00

01

47

197

00

01

58

196

00

03

91

195

00

05

80

193

00

00

20

192

00

10

80

191

00

00

20

190

00

00

24

189

00

00

38

187(fiQYM psuy)

00

03

52

3974

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3975

383

00

04

89

389

00

00

20

384

00

04

75

385

00

06

16

388

00

13

20

387

00

00

20

435

00

00

20

436

00

05

90

437

00

10

75

438

00

00

20

449

00

04

71

448

00

09

77

447

00

03

62

453

00

00

20

445

00

04

23

444

00

00

20

446

00

23

36

460

00

00

20

461

00

01

95

471

00

00

20

469

00

23

77

468

00

00

20

530

00

04

27

529

00

00

20

528

00

08

77

531

00

00

20

532

00

02

47

533

00

06

61

523

00

00

20

534

00

06

94

539

00

06

10

535

00

00

23

538

00

00

60

537

00

01

49

536

00

00

20

546

00

00

31

545

00

00

20

547

00

10

27

549

00

18

73

557

00

03

37

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3976

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

558

00

00

20

556

00

08

39

555

00

00

20

550

00

03

34

551

00

02

96

552

00

05

63

553

00

02

03

554

00

00

82

604(dsuky)

00

02

00

605

00

00

20

7

00

00

78

606

00

03

20

607

00

01

62

608

00

00

54

tSriqj

2874

00

03

87

Fkkuk uacj&170

2875

00

06

38

2876

00

00

34

2873(fiQYM psuy)

00

01

23

2871

00

01

25

2870

00

03

17

2869

00

06

16

2868

00

11

82

2867

00

05

92

2864

00

00

20

2865

00

02

30

2866

00

04

78

2850(dPpk jkLrk)

00

01

67

2851

00

00

20

2708(fiQYM psuy)

00

01

33

2712

00

00

20

2711

00

09

96

2709

00

00

40

2714

00

00

35

2715

00

00

20

2717

00

00

20

2710

00

02

28

2702

00

00

20

2720

00

01

34

2721

00

02

23

2722

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3977

2701

00

02

48

2700

00

05

14

2699

00

01

24

2698

00

06

21

2697

00

02

51

2727(ukyk)

00

00

20

2695

00

00

20

2683

00

05

60

2696

00

12

90

2686

00

02

45

2694

00

00

50

2692

00

00

20

2687

00

03

13

2688

00

00

20

2689

00

03

09

2691

00

01

70

2690

00

01

34

2679

00

00

20

2736

00

00

48

2741

00

25

84

2678

00

02

62

2676

00

03

51

2675

00

05

12

2448(jkLrk)

00

01

08

2400

00

08

04

2401

00

00

20

2402

00

00

20

2399

00

02

27

2403

00

05

17

2433

00

02

90

2437

00

00

20

2432

00

05

53

2431

00

02

74

2430

00

00

29

2442

00

12

22

2429

00

00

20

2427

00

01

97

2426

00

04

71

2425

00

03

24

2424

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3978

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2423

00

06

31

2422

00

02

68

2420

00

00

20

2421

00

02

24

2416

00

00

51

2458

00

00

20

2459

00

03

50

2466

00

12

29

2467

00

01

99

2468

00

03

12

2469

00

02

26

2470

00

03

99

2471

00

01

55

2472

00

00

46

2473

00

00

20

2474

00

00

20

2391(ukyk)

00

01

84

2215

00

00

40

2214

00

01

41

2213

00

02

28

2212

00

02

46

2211

00

09

04

2210

00

05

77

2209

00

06

04

2208

00

02

18

2207

00

01

75

2206

00

02

65

2205

00

02

20

2200

00

03

05

2203

00

01

36

2202

00

01

44

2201

00

05

58

2197

00

09

30

2198

00

00

95

2196

00

01

82

2195

00

03

67

2193

00

05

57

2192

00

05

67

2191

00

05

93

2190

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3979

2189

00

00

20

2188

00

09

58

2187

00

08

66

2186

00

08

55

2184

00

07

71

2183

00

00

20

2185

00

05

16

2172

00

00

20

2174

00

01

50

2173

00

16

48

2170

00

00

25

2257(ukyk)

00

00

96

1419

00

03

19

1420

00

01

70

1425

00

01

90

1424

00

07

88

1430

00

03

62

1423

00

00

36

1431

00

05

40

1432

00

06

41

1433

00

00

20

1440

00

05

99

1439

00

02

48

1435

00

00

34

1438

00

02

48

1437

00

07

81

1436

00

00

49

1450(ukyk)

00

01

24

1449

00

01

63

407

00

14

13

1451(ukyk)

00

00

36

406

00

02

28

404

00

15

75

403

00

04

02

434

00

00

20

435

00

03

46

402(jkLrk)

00

01

31

400(jkLrk)

00

01

04

401(jkLrk)

00

01

42

366

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3980

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

361

00

09

07

365

00

00

58

362

00

06

54

363

00

04

82

354

00

02

43

338

00

02

31

339

00

00

20

340

00

00

20

337

00

02

55

336

00

02

49

341

00

02

95

335

00

01

39

334

00

02

64

342

00

00

20

333

00

00

83

329

00

00

20

328

00

07

66

327

00

03

38

326

00

07

51

345(jkLrk)

00

01

66

,uk;riqj

2035

00

02

01

Fkkuk uacj&156

2036

00

00

20

2034

00

00

20

2030

00

01

42

2031

00

04

41

2033

00

00

20

2032

00

01

86

2046

00

00

20

2029

00

00

39

2025

00

03

61

2024

00

05

24

2023

00

00

20

2018(ukyk)

00

01

41

ekus

1608@3345 (jkLrk)

00

01

72

Fkkuk uacj&169

1615

00

05

74

1611

00

00

20

1612

00

00

20

1614

00

04

61

1613

00

08

57

1604

00

02

23

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3981

1603

00

01

87

1602

00

02

09

1601

00

04

54

1599

00

05

02

1596

00

00

20

1598

00

03

93

1597

00

03

10

1594

00

02

37

1591

00

00

51

1592

00

01

70

1584

00

08

07

1582

00

04

97

1583

00

00

20

1576

00

03

08

1575

00

00

20

1577

00

03

53

1573

00

03

34

1572

00

02

41

1578

00

00

20

1568

00

11

67

1563

00

00

20

1569

00

00

20

1558

00

04

14

1557

00

00

25

1559

00

00

20

1560

00

02

67

1561

00

02

36

1562

00

00

41

1550

00

11

41

1551

00

01

42

1548

00

00

52

1549

00

03

56

1547

00

03

59

1546

00

04

22

1545

00

03

85

1544

00

03

85

1538

00

15

39

1445

00

00

20

1446

00

00

20

1536

00

01

17

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3982

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1537

00

00

47

1451

00

10

51

1423

00

00

20

1448

00

00

33

1449

00

06

33

1450

00

07

45

1437

00

01

80

1433

00

00

46

1434

00

08

86

1431

00

00

20

1435

00

02

00

791

00

00

20

1430

00

00

85

1429

00

04

05

792

00

03

83

793

00

00

20

810

00

07

38

811

00

06

11

812

00

02

60

815

00

01

98

816

00

10

21

817

00

00

20

806

00

00

41

824

00

03

36

836

00

03

32

837

00

00

20

835

00

00

59

838

00

03

95

839

00

03

83

854

00

12

80

857

00

01

41

856

00

08

92

859

00

08

68

710

00

54

88

863 (jkLrk)

00

02

82

866 (jkLrk)

00

02

78

920 (jsYkos)

00

07

72

921(jsYkos)

00

02

16

1285

00

04

83

1229

00

01

10

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3983

1228

00

00

20

1230

00

06

22

1233

00

08

14

1277

00

00

20

1276

00

00

20

1234

00

09

75

1237

00

00

94

1235

00

03

78

1232

00

00

20

1236

00

01

62

1218 (fiQYM psuy)

00

01

25

1214

00

00

83

1212

00

02

52

1211

00

00

67

1213

00

07

26

1148

00

00

20

1149

00

00

20

1151

00

00

20

1166

00

08

15

1165

00

07

97

1164

00

07

31

1162

00

04

79

1160

00

06

92

1161

00

00

20

1125

00

15

18

1119

00

04

90

1120

00

00

20

1118

00

03

23

1103

00

00

20

1117

00

00

20

1104

00

10

27

1105

00

05

15

1096

00

05

16

1091

00

02

92

1089

00

00

20

1090

00

02

86

1088

00

02

83

1086

00

05

47

1082

00

05

49

1080

00

04

50

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3984

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1076

00

00

20

1075

00

04

45

1065

00

07

52

1056

00

00

31

1055

00

07

77

1054

00

03

64

1046

00

08

52

1050

00

01

40

1047

00

00

57

1049

00

06

22

1048

00

02

57

1024

00

03

07

1025

00

05

20

1023

00

12

89

1027

00

11

26

1026

00

00

20

941(dsuky)

00

00

20

1019

00

00

20

1030 (dsuky)

00

01

15

gde

1065

00

01

35

Fkkuk uacj&167

1066(dsuky)

00

00

96

1067

00

08

67

1068

00

06

26

1069

00

00

20

1059

00

01

10

1058

00

00

20

1037

00

02

15

1036

00

01

58

1038

00

11

16

1039

00

02

89

1040

00

12

36

428

00

01

21

436

00

00

20

427

00

00

20

429

00

05

74

435

00

00

20

433

00

06

00

434

00

05

20

328

00

02

01

363

00

05

67

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3985

329

00

02

77

332

00

03

96

331

00

00

20

362

00

00

24

361

00

00

83

333

00

04

42

334

00

00

20

335

00

01

62

336

00

01

68

337

00

01

31

360

00

00

47

358

00

00

20

359

00

00

20

338

00

01

49

339

00

01

63

341

00

00

20

342

00

00

20

343

00

00

20

344

00

00

20

340

00

03

98

277

00

00

20

278

00

00

20

345

00

03

96

346

00

00

23

389

00

00

20

276

00

10

72

272

00

07

59

273

00

09

34

271

00

12

94

243

00

00

50

270

00

03

68

269

00

00

85

268

00

21

48

248

00

00

59

249

00

05

65

250

00

02

55

59

00

00

20

251

00

02

42

252

00

01

28

253

00

01

05

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3986

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

254

00

00

48

255

00

00

20

56

00

15

92

55

00

00

33

48

00

04

21

49

00

03

44

47

00

00

20

50

00

01

24

51

00

02

85

52

00

08

13

46

00

01

36

41

00

03

45

45

00

01

29

44

00

02

55

43

00

03

27

42

00

09

07

10

00

00

20

15

00

00

20

9

00

08

90

8

00

00

20

16

00

03

18

3

00

09

93

6

00

03

53

4

00

00

20

5

00

03

30

galjktiqj

1341

00

09

06

Fkkuk uacj&164

1342

00

09

85

1343

00

05

82

1344

00

22

13

1337

00

00

58

1345

00

17

95

1346

00

02

71

1325

00

21

75

1331

00

00

20

1328

00

07

66

1327

00

01

68

1323

00

00

20

1309

00

11

83

1308

00

01

19

1307

00

01

26

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3987

1306

00

00

82

1305

00

03

43

1291

00

00

20

1304

00

04

57

1292

00

05

79

1302

00

00

20

1301

00

04

91

1297

00

03

89

1298

00

00

52

1300

00

03

65

862

00

00

20

1299

00

00

95

323(jkLrk)

00

01

24

322(jkLrk)

00

01

18

321(jkLrk)

00

01

18

318

00

00

20

283

00

02

63

282

00

01

71

281

00

01

39

284

00

00

78

285

00

01

71

280

00

08

72

289

00

05

42

290

00

04

09

276

00

00

20

291

00

00

20

279

00

00

25

293

00

01

32

294

00

00

20

292

00

05

10

296

00

07

39

297

00

02

97

270

00

00

20

298

00

06

67

269

00

01

44

300

00

00

20

299

00

07

20

268

00

00

65

267

00

00

82

266

00

01

26

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3988

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

265

00

01

70

207

00

10

42

208

00

03

44

206

00

10

85

203

00

01

19

205

00

01

80

204

00

01

27

202

00

01

79

201

00

00

20

jktkiqj

1755

00

02

73

Fkkuk uacj&78

1812

00

01

33

1753

00

01

65

1752

00

00

24

1750

00

00

20

1749

00

00

20

1748

00

00

20

1742

00

02

53

1741

00

00

72

1740

00

00

58

1728

00

10

15

1729

00

02

83

1731

00

00

20

1730

00

05

52

1707

00

01

42

1708

00

02

95

1706

00

05

37

1705

00

00

70

1676&jkLrk

00

00

81

1675&jkLrk

00

00

93

1674&jkLrk

00

00

94

1667

00

07

36

1668

00

00

20

538

00

02

41

1666

00

03

83

541

00

01

78

542

00

02

11

1664

00

06

74

543

00

00

20

548

00

00

20

549

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3989

1655

00

03

92

1654

00

01

45

1653

00

02

08

1652

00

00

73

1638

00

03

72

1637

00

00

43

1636

00

00

47

1639

00

03

04

1635

00

02

60

1631

00

04

13

1630

00

00

20

1629

00

00

20

1628

00

03

35

1625

00

02

33

1624

00

02

38

1623

00

01

66

1622

00

01

47

1621

00

01

67

1620

00

01

73

1619

00

00

94

1618

00

00

81

1615

00

01

82

1617

00

01

27

1616

00

01

57

1614

00

05

84

1613

00

01

41

1612

00

02

05

588&jkLrk

00

02

47

591

00

03

48

828

00

02

57

592

00

01

64

813

00

00

22

814

00

00

20

827

00

03

06

826

00

03

32

825

00

06

20

832

00

00

20

833

00

00

20

840

00

05

76

839

00

01

07

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3990

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

841

00

06

96

1529

00

02

38

857

00

03

10

859

00

00

76

856

00

02

52

855

00

02

40

860

00

00

46

861

00

00

20

862

00

02

83

863

00

00

52

864

00

01

88

865

00

03

40

867

00

00

20

866

00

02

59

853

00

00

20

1521&dPpk jkLrk

00

01

56

305

00

10

15

295

00

02

00

304

00

00

83

303

00

00

54

296

00

04

31

302

00

01

73

298

00

00

85

280

00

01

22

297

00

02

07

281@1804

00

00

80

281

00

00

93

286

00

00

98

285

00

00

20

287

00

02

64

291

00

04

89

290

00

01

08

288

00

04

22

273

00

00

20

274

00

00

20

289

00

01

27

268

00

00

31

269

00

00

20

271

00

02

12

270

00

02

38

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3991

257

00

05

01

258

00

00

20

256

00

03

27

255

00

00

20

259&ukyk

00

01

10

153

00

02

97

152

00

00

20

154

00

14

86

155

00

00

20

160

00

00

20

150

00

00

20

149

00

00

20

161

00

00

54

162

00

00

75

163

00

01

01

165

00

01

45

164

00

02

33

142

00

01

51

141

00

02

59

140

00

06

94

139

00

02

61

138

00

00

20

136

00

08

27

135

00

03

18

133

00

01

96

132

00

01

57

877

00

10

85

945

00

03

85

943

00

02

67

942

00

06

01

941

00

13

29

940

00

00

36

939

00

00

20

931

00

19

56

930

00

07

46

923

00

00

20

917&ukyk

00

07

37

959&ukyk

00

06

96

46&ukyk

00

07

00

993

00

00

87

994

00

03

14

995

00

02

90

996

00

00

76

997

00

04

66

998

00

00

99

999

00

00

20

1008

00

09

77

1009

00

00

20

1007

00

01

55

1010

00

08

77

1011

00

04

93

16

00

17

56

17

00

04

75

15

00

15

79

14

00

00

20

13

00

06

65

12

00

03

38

11

00

00

64

9

00

00

20

venkjgh

1993

00

02

50

Fkkuk uacja-&79

1994

00

00

20

1989

00

03

03

1988

00

04

40

1987

00

06

56

1984

00

03

50

1982

00

04

07

1981

00

06

61

¹iQk- la- vkj&25011@21@2013&vksvkj&Iº

iou oqQekj] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 27th July, 2013

S.O. 1538.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that a

pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited in Dist. Saran in the State of Bihar for 'Patna to Motihari and

Baitalpur Pipeline' for the transportation of Petroleum Product;

And, whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary

to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which is described in the

Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals

Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention

to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on

which the copies of the notification issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of

India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the

pipeline under the land, to Shri Arun Kumar Jha B.A.S. & Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited. (Pipelines

Division) P.O. Dhelwan, Sipara, Dist. Patna (Bihar.) Pin - 800020.

3992

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

SCHEDULE

Dist.: Saran

State : Bihar

Mouja / Village

Survey/Block No.

Sub-Div-No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

DAUDPUR

1(Canal)

00

02

58

Thana Number :155

223

00

00

20

222

00

02

30

220

00

03

87

221

00

01

02

227

00

00

20

219

00

03

80

218

00

09

22

216

00

00

20

217

00

02

26

206

00

00

20

194

00

05

30

198

00

01

47

197

00

01

58

196

00

03

91

195

00

05

80

193

00

00

20

192

00

10

80

191

00

00

20

190

00

00

24

189

00

00

38

187(Field Channel)

00

03

52

383

00

04

89

389

00

00

20

384

00

04

75

385

00

06

16

388

00

13

20

387

00

00

20

435

00

00

20

436

00

05

90

437

00

10

75

438

00

00

20

449

00

04

71

448

00

09

77

447

00

03

62

453

00

00

20

445

00

04

23

444

00

00

20

446

00

23

36

460

00

00

20

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3993

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3994

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

461

00

01

95

471

00

00

20

469

00

23

77

468

00

00

20

530

00

04

27

529

00

00

20

528

00

08

77

531

00

00

20

532

00

02

47

533

00

06

61

523

00

00

20

534

00

06

94

539

00

06

10

535

00

00

23

538

00

00

60

537

00

01

49

536

00

00

20

546

00

00

31

545

00

00

20

547

00

10

27

549

00

18

73

557

00

03

37

558

00

00

20

556

00

08

39

555

00

00

20

550

00

03

34

551

00

02

96

552

00

05

63

553

00

02

03

554

00

00

82

604 (Canal)

00

02

00

605

00

00

20

7

00

00

78

606

00

03

20

607

00

01

62

608

00

00

54

JAITPUR

2874

00

03

87

Thana Number :170

2875

00

06

38

2876

00

00

34

2873 (Field Channel)

00

01

23

2871

00

01

25

2870

00

03

17

2869

00

06

16

2868

00

11

82

2867

00

05

92

2864

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3995

2865

00

02

30

2866

00

04

78

2850(Cart Track)

00

01

67

2851

00

00

20

2708 (Field Channel)

00

01

33

2712

00

00

20

2711

00

09

96

2709

00

00

40

2714

00

00

35

2715

00

00

20

2717

00

00

20

2710

00

02

28

2702

00

00

20

2720

00

01

34

2721

00

02

23

2722

00

00

20

2701

00

02

48

2700

00

05

14

2699

00

01

24

2698

00

06

21

2697

00

02

51

2727(Nala)

00

00

20

2695

00

00

20

2683

00

05

60

2696

00

12

90

2686

00

02

45

2694

00

00

50

2692

00

00

20

2687

00

03

13

2688

00

00

20

2689

00

03

09

2691

00

01

70

2690

00

01

34

2679

00

00

20

2736

00

00

48

2741

00

25

84

2678

00

02

62

2676

00

03

51

2675

00

05

12

2448(Road)

00

01

08

2400

00

08

04

2401

00

00

20

2402

00

00

20

2399

00

02

27

2403

00

05

17

2433

00

02

90

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3996

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2437

00

00

20

2432

00

05

53

2431

00

02

74

2430

00

00

29

2442

00

12

22

2429

00

00

20

2427

00

01

97

2426

00

04

71

2425

00

03

24

2424

00

00

20

2423

00

06

31

2422

00

02

68

2420

00

00

20

2421

00

02

24

2416

00

00

51

2458

00

00

20

2459

00

03

50

2466

00

12

29

2467

00

01

99

2468

00

03

12

2469

00

02

26

2470

00

03

99

2471

00

01

55

2472

00

00

46

2473

00

00

20

2474

00

00

20

2391(Nala)

00

01

84

2215

00

00

40

2214

00

01

41

2213

00

02

28

2212

00

02

46

2211

00

09

04

2210

00

05

77

2209

00

06

04

2208

00

02

18

2207

00

01

75

2206

00

02

65

2205

00

02

20

2200

00

03

05

2203

00

01

36

2202

00

01

44

2201

00

05

58

2197

00

09

30

2198

00

00

95

2196

00

01

82

2195

00

03

67

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3997

2193

00

05

57

2192

00

05

67

2191

00

05

93

2190

00

00

20

2189

00

00

20

2188

00

09

58

2187

00

08

66

2186

00

08

55

2184

00

07

71

2183

00

00

20

2185

00

05

16

2172

00

00

20

2174

00

01

50

2173

00

16

48

2170

00

00

25

2257(Nala)

00

00

96

1419

00

03

19

1420

00

01

70

1425

00

01

90

1424

00

07

88

1430

00

03

62

1423

00

00

36

1431

00

05

40

1432

00

06

41

1433

00

00

20

1440

00

05

99

1439

00

02

48

1435

00

00

34

1438

00

02

48

1437

00

07

81

1436

00

00

49

1450(Nala)

00

01

24

1449

00

01

63

407

00

14

13

1451(Nala)

00

00

36

406

00

02

28

404

00

15

75

403

00

04

02

434

00

00

20

435

00

03

46

402(Road)

00

01

31

400(Road)

00

01

04

401(Road)

00

01

42

366

00

00

20

361

00

09

07

365

00

00

58

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

3998

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

362

00

06

54

363

00

04

82

354

00

02

43

338

00

02

31

339

00

00

20

340

00

00

20

337

00

02

55

336

00

02

49

341

00

02

95

335

00

01

39

334

00

02

64

342

00

00

20

333

00

00

83

329

00

00

20

328

00

07

66

327

00

03

38

326

00

07

51

345(Road)

00

01

66

ENAETPUR

2035

00

02

01

Thana Number :156

2036

00

00

20

2034

00

00

20

2030

00

01

42

2031

00

04

41

2033

00

00

20

2032

00

01

86

2046

00

00

20

2029

00

00

39

2025

00

03

61

2024

00

05

24

2023

00

00

20

2018(Nala)

00

01

41

MANE NO

1608/3345 (Road)

00

01

72

Thana Number :169

1615

00

05

74

1611

00

00

20

1612

00

00

20

1614

00

04

61

1613

00

08

57

1604

00

02

23

1603

00

01

87

1602

00

02

09

1601

00

04

54

1599

00

05

02

1596

00

00

20

1598

00

03

93

1597

00

03

10

1594

00

02

37

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

3999

1591

00

00

51

1592

00

01

70

1584

00

08

07

1582

00

04

97

1583

00

00

20

1576

00

03

08

1575

00

00

20

1577

00

03

53

1573

00

03

34

1572

00

02

41

1578

00

00

20

1568

00

11

67

1563

00

00

20

1569

00

00

20

1558

00

04

14

1557

00

00

25

1559

00

00

20

1560

00

02

67

1561

00

02

36

1562

00

00

41

1550

00

11

41

1551

00

01

42

1548

00

00

52

1549

00

03

56

1547

00

03

59

1546

00

04

22

1545

00

03

85

1544

00

03

85

1538

00

15

39

1445

00

00

20

1446

00

00

20

1536

00

01

17

1537

00

00

47

1451

00

10

51

1423

00

00

20

1448

00

00

33

1449

00

06

33

1450

00

07

45

1437

00

01

80

1433

00

00

46

1434

00

08

86

1431

00

00

20

1435

00

02

00

791

00

00

20

1430

00

00

85

1429

00

04

05

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4000

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

792

00

03

83

793

00

00

20

810

00

07

38

811

00

06

11

812

00

02

60

815

00

01

98

816

00

10

21

817

00

00

20

806

00

00

41

824

00

03

36

836

00

03

32

837

00

00

20

835

00

00

59

838

00

03

95

839

00

03

83

854

00

12

80

857

00

01

41

856

00

08

92

859

00

08

68

710

00

54

88

863 (Road)

00

02

82

866 (Road)

00

02

78

920 (Railway)

00

07

72

921(Railway)

00

02

16

1285

00

04

83

1229

00

01

10

1228

00

00

20

1230

00

06

22

1233

00

08

14

1277

00

00

20

1276

00

00

20

1234

00

09

75

1237

00

00

94

1235

00

03

78

1232

00

00

20

1236

00

01

62

1218 (Field Channel)

00

01

25

1214

00

00

83

1212

00

02

52

1211

00

00

67

1213

00

07

26

1148

00

00

20

1149

00

00

20

1151

00

00

20

1166

00

08

15

1165

00

07

97

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4001

1164

00

07

31

1162

00

04

79

1160

00

06

92

1161

00

00

20

1125

00

15

18

1119

00

04

90

1120

00

00

20

1118

00

03

23

1103

00

00

20

1117

00

00

20

1104

00

10

27

1105

00

05

15

1096

00

05

16

1091

00

02

92

1089

00

00

20

1090

00

02

86

1088

00

02

83

1086

00

05

47

1082

00

05

49

1080

00

04

50

1076

00

00

20

1075

00

04

45

1065

00

07

52

1056

00

00

31

1055

00

07

77

1054

00

03

64

1046

00

08

52

1050

00

01

40

1047

00

00

57

1049

00

06

22

1048

00

02

57

1024

00

03

07

1025

00

05

20

1023

00

12

89

1027

00

11

26

1026

00

00

20

941(Canal)

00

00

20

1019

00

00

20

1030 (Canal)

00

01

15

HAKAM

1065

00

01

35

Thana Number :167

1066(Canal)

00

00

96

1067

00

08

67

1068

00

06

26

1069

00

00

20

1059

00

01

10

1058

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4002

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1037

00

02

15

1036

00

01

58

1038

00

11

16

1039

00

02

89

1040

00

12

36

428

00

01

21

436

00

00

20

427

00

00

20

429

00

05

74

435

00

00

20

433

00

06

00

434

00

05

20

328

00

02

01

363

00

05

67

329

00

02

77

332

00

03

96

331

00

00

20

362

00

00

24

361

00

00

83

333

00

04

42

334

00

00

20

335

00

01

62

336

00

01

68

337

00

01

31

360

00

00

47

358

00

00

20

359

00

00

20

338

00

01

49

339

00

01

63

341

00

00

20

342

00

00

20

343

00

00

20

344

00

00

20

340

00

03

98

277

00

00

20

278

00

00

20

345

00

03

96

346

00

00

23

389

00

00

20

276

00

10

72

272

00

07

59

273

00

09

34

271

00

12

94

243

00

00

50

270

00

03

68

269

00

00

85

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4003

268

00

21

48

248

00

00

59

249

00

05

65

250

00

02

55

59

00

00

20

251

00

02

42

252

00

01

28

253

00

01

05

254

00

00

48

255

00

00

20

56

00

15

92

55

00

00

33

48

00

04

21

49

00

03

44

47

00

00

20

50

00

01

24

51

00

02

85

52

00

08

13

46

00

01

36

41

00

03

45

45

00

01

29

44

00

02

55

43

00

03

27

42

00

09

07

10

00

00

20

15

00

00

20

9

00

08

90

8

00

00

20

16

00

03

18

3

00

09

93

6

00

03

53

4

00

00

20

5

00

03

30

HANSRAJPUR Thana Number:

1341

00

09

06

164

1342

00

09

85

1343

00

05

82

1344

00

22

13

1337

00

00

58

1345

00

17

95

1346

00

02

71

1325

00

21

75

1331

00

00

20

1328

00

07

66

1327

00

01

68

1323

00

00

20

1309

00

11

83

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4004

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1308

00

01

19

1307

00

01

26

1306

00

00

82

1305

00

03

43

1291

00

00

20

1304

00

04

57

1292

00

05

79

1302

00

00

20

1301

00

04

91

1297

00

03

89

1298

00

00

52

1300

00

03

65

862

00

00

20

1299

00

00

95

323(Road)

00

01

24

322(Road)

00

01

18

321(Road)

00

01

18

318

00

00

20

283

00

02

63

282

00

01

71

281

00

01

39

284

00

00

78

285

00

01

71

280

00

08

72

289

00

05

42

290

00

04

09

276

00

00

20

291

00

00

20

279

00

00

25

293

00

01

32

294

00

00

20

292

00

05

10

296

00

07

39

297

00

02

97

270

00

00

20

298

00

06

67

269

00

01

44

300

00

00

20

299

00

07

20

268

00

00

65

267

00

00

82

266

00

01

26

265

00

01

70

207

00

10

42

208

00

03

44

206

00

10

85

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4005

203

00

01

19

205

00

01

80

204

00

01

27

202

00

01

79

201

00

00

20

RAJAPUR

1755

00

02

73

Thana Number :78

1812

00

01

33

1753

00

01

65

1752

00

00

24

1750

00

00

20

1749

00

00

20

1748

00

00

20

1742

00

02

53

1741

00

00

72

1740

00

00

58

1728

00

10

15

1729

00

02

83

1731

00

00

20

1730

00

05

52

1707

00

01

42

1708

00

02

95

1706

00

05

37

1705

00

00

70

1676-Road

00

00

81

1675-Road

00

00

93

1674-Road

00

00

94

1667

00

07

36

1668

00

00

20

538

00

02

41

1666

00

03

83

541

00

01

78

542

00

02

11

1664

00

06

74

543

00

00

20

548

00

00

20

549

00

00

20

1655

00

03

92

1654

00

01

45

1653

00

02

08

1652

00

00

73

1638

00

03

72

1637

00

00

43

1636

00

00

47

1639

00

03

04

1635

00

02

60

1631

00

04

13

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4006

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1630

00

00

20

1629

00

00

20

1628

00

03

35

1625

00

02

33

1624

00

02

38

1623

00

01

66

1622

00

01

47

1621

00

01

67

1620

00

01

73

1619

00

00

94

1618

00

00

81

1615

00

01

82

1617

00

01

27

1616

00

01

57

1614

00

05

84

1613

00

01

41

1612

00

02

05

588-Road

00

02

47

591

00

03

48

828

00

02

57

592

00

01

64

813

00

00

22

814

00

00

20

827

00

03

06

826

00

03

32

825

00

06

20

832

00

00

20

833

00

00

20

840

00

05

76

839

00

01

07

841

00

06

96

1529

00

02

38

857

00

03

10

859

00

00

76

856

00

02

52

855

00

02

40

860

00

00

46

861

00

00

20

862

00

02

83

863

00

00

52

864

00

01

88

865

00

03

40

867

00

00

20

866

00

02

59

853

00

00

20

1521-cart track

00

01

56

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4007

305

00

10

15

295

00

02

00

304

00

00

83

303

00

00

54

296

00

04

31

302

00

01

73

298

00

00

85

280

00

01

22

297

00

02

07

281/1804

00

00

80

281

00

00

93

286

00

00

98

285

00

00

20

287

00

02

64

291

00

04

89

290

00

01

08

288

00

04

22

273

00

00

20

274

00

00

20

289

00

01

27

268

00

00

31

269

00

00

20

271

00

02

12

270

00

02

38

257

00

05

01

258

00

00

20

256

00

03

27

255

00

00

20

259-Nala

00

01

10

153

00

02

97

152

00

00

20

154

00

14

86

155

00

00

20

160

00

00

20

150

00

00

20

149

00

00

20

161

00

00

54

162

00

00

75

163

00

01

01

165

00

01

45

164

00

02

33

142

00

01

51

141

00

02

59

140

00

06

94

139

00

02

61

138

00

00

20

136

00

08

27

135

00

03

18

133

00

01

96

132

00

01

57

877

00

10

85

945

00

03

85

943

00

02

67

942

00

06

01

941

00

13

29

940

00

00

36

939

00

00

20

931

00

19

56

930

00

07

46

923

00

00

20

917-Nala

00

07

37

959-Nala

00

06

96

46-Nala

00

07

00

993

00

00

87

994

00

03

14

995

00

02

90

996

00

00

76

997

00

04

66

998

00

00

99

999

00

00

20

1008

00

09

77

1009

00

00

20

1007

00

01

55

1010

00

08

77

1011

00

04

93

16

00

17

56

17

00

04

75

15

00

15

79

14

00

00

20

13

00

06

65

12

00

03

38

11

00

00

64

9

00

00

20

AMDARHI

1993

00

02

50

Thana Number :79

1994

00

00

20

1989

00

03

03

1988

00

04

40

1987

00

06

56

1984

00

03

50

1982

00

04

07

1981

00

06

61

[F. No. R-25011/21/2013-OR-I]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

4008

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

ubZ fnYyh] 27 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1539-—dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slk izrhr gksrk gS fd yksd fgr esa ;g vko';d gS fd iVuk ls eksfrgkjh vkSj csrkyiqj rd

isVªksfy;e inkFkks± ds ifjogu gsrq ftyk floku] jkT; fcgkj esa bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkuh pkfg, A

vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slh ikbiykbu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, vko';d izrhr gksrk gS fd ml Hkwfe esa ftlds Hkhrj mDr

ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkus dk izLrko gS vkSj tks bl vf/lwpuk ls layXu vuqlwfp esa o£.kr gS] mi;ksx dk vtZu fd;k tk, A

vr% vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbUl (Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/dkj dk vtZu) vf/fu;e] 1962 (1962

dk 50) dh /kjk 3 dh mi/kjk(1) }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] mDr Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/dkj dk vtZu djus ds vius vk'k;

dh ?kks"k.kk djrh gSA

dksbZ O;fDr] tks mDr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa fgrc¼ gS] ml rkjh[k ls ftldks] Hkkjr ds jkti=k esa ;Fkk izdkf'kr bl

vfèklwpuk dh izfr;ka lk/kj.k turk dks miyC/ djk nh tkrh gS] bDdhl fnu ds vUnj] Hkwfe ds Hkhrj ikbiykbu fcNk, tkus gsrq mi;ksx

ds vf/dkj ds vtZu ds fy,] Jh v:.k dqekj >k] fc-iz-ls- o l{ke izkf/dkjh bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM] (ikbiykbu fMohtu)

iVuk] iks-vks- <syok] flikjk] ftyk iVuk] fiu% 800020] fcgkj dks fyf[kr :i eas vk{ksi Hkst ldsxkA

vuqlwph

ftyk % floku

jkT; % fcgkj

ekStk@xzke

losZ@Cykd@la- (IyksV la-)

lc&Mho&la-

{ks=kiQy

gsDVs;j

vkjs

oxZ ehVj

1

2

3

4

5

6

lgwyh

6335

00

00

59

Fkkuk uacj&366

6333

00

00

20

6334

00

13

90

5884 ¼vsl-vsp-½

00

02

71

6121

00

00

20

6122

00

10

15

6145

00

01

01

6123

00

07

35

6144

00

00

20

6143

00

02

07

6158

00

21

23

6160

00

01

03

6161

00

00

38

6170

00

02

01

6162

00

01

19

6157

00

01

40

6177

00

11

23

6178

00

00

20

6176

00

09

93

6175

00

04

75

6174

00

00

90

6181

00

03

34

6182

00

03

58

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4009

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4010

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

lgwyh

6188

00

00

20

Fkkuk uacj&366

6173

00

03

40

6183

00

01

42

6186

00

02

07

6187

00

00

20

6185

00

05

67

6184

00

06

58

2142

00

00

20

6195

00

00

49

6193

00

00

20

2069

00

01

79

2068

00

00

20

2070

00

01

97

2071

00

00

64

2072

00

03

32

2067

00

00

20

2073

00

02

69

2074

00

03

08

2076

00

00

20

2075

00

05

01

2064

00

02

00

2078

00

01

30

2079

00

01

68

2080

00

10

10

2082

00

01

48

2085

00

03

11

2084

00

07

41

2083

00

15

31

2045

00

00

20

2046

00

00

20

1982

00

04

48

1983

00

00

20

1981

00

02

25

1980

00

01

85

1979

00

07

59

1977

00

00

37

1978

00

04

85

1974

00

08

76

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4011

lgwyh

1953

00

00

20

Fkkuk uacj&366

1955

00

10

37

1971

00

00

20

1972

00

00

20

1968

00

00

78

1956

00

04

58

1964

00

01

03

1967

00

03

26

1965

00

00

20

1966

00

01

44

1303@6860¼jkLrk½

00

04

80

1927¼jkLrk½

00

00

20

1304

00

07

78

1305

00

00

20

1308@6837

00

00

77

1308@6836

00

05

27

1309

00

04

99

1310

00

02

96

1311

00

09

53

1317

00

03

47

1318

00

06

43

1319

00

05

73

1290

00

21

38

1289

00

00

34

1288

00

07

47

1287

00

00

55

1286

00

05

67

1285

00

09

68

1284

00

03

08

1282

00

00

20

1283

00

00

93

gjhgalFkkuk uacj&362

6574

00

12

80

6573

00

00

20

Qthyiwj

1532

00

09

02

Fkkuk uacj&364

1531

00

01

91

1526

00

04

35

1525

00

08

04

1519

00

09

44

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4012

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Qthyiwj

1518

00

02

23

Fkkuk uacj&364

1517

00

03

25

1513

00

08

48

1514

00

03

25

1511

00

05

15

1515

00

00

56

1509

00

14

19

1510

00

00

20

1496

00

02

50

1508

00

07

04

1499

00

04

15

1498

00

05

93

1497

00

00

63

1493

00

05

72

1474

00

03

14

1475

00

00

20

1490

00

02

04

1489

00

03

06

1488

00

06

57

1479

00

24

39

1478

00

00

79

1480

00

00

20

1552

00

05

23

1467

00

00

55

1466

00

01

76

1417

00

02

97

1427

00

36

74

1424

00

00

20

1431

00

12

14

1433

00

07

64

1432

00

03

00

1434

00

07

99

1436

00

05

65

1435

00

10

61

1364

00

00

55

1363

00

03

27

1362

00

07

99

1361

00

06

78

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4013

Qthyiwj

1359

00

00

20

Fkkuk uacj&364

1353

00

00

27

1360

00

02

46

1354

00

09

48

1341

00

28

33

1339

00

01

10

1335

00

00

20

1336

00

03

60

1181¼Mªsu½

00

02

62

c/kksuh

552

00

00

20

Fkkuk uacj- 365

551

00

04

17

549

00

06

46

550

00

09

73

546

00

00

20

545

00

00

20

544

00

14

43

543

00

00

62

531

00

01

29

[kkuiwj [kSjarh

2577

00

00

20

Fkkuk uacj&363

2576

00

11

33

2578

00

01

64

2575

00

07

87

2570

00

14

03

2569

00

11

27

2566

00

09

93

2565

00

07

78

2564

00

14

96

1280

00

00

20

1281

00

00

20

1298

00

05

21

1299

00

04

75

1302

00

01

09

1301

00

01

68

1296

00

00

20

1300

00

00

95

1310

00

04

20

1305

00

00

20

1309

00

19

40

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4014

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

[kkuiwj [kSjarh

1308

00

07

59

Fkkuk uacj&363

1313

00

12

73

1399

00

02

36

1355

00

06

58

1354

00

00

20

1356

00

00

63

1357

00

02

47

1393

00

00

20

1358

00

07

79

1359

00

04

13

1389

00

09

81

1388

00

05

59

1386

00

04

57

1387

00

00

20

1385

00

08

05

1368

00

00

20

1369

00

00

20

1384

00

11

69

1380

00

08

18

1379

00

01

18

1378

00

00

84

1467¼jkLrk½

00

01

52

1488

00

04

85

1030

00

00

20

1489

00

02

62

1029

00

01

59

1023

00

03

28

1028

00

05

85

1027

00

04

51

1026

00

00

20

1025

00

00

20

1024

00

04

79

1020

00

01

09

1048

00

13

83

1019

00

01

57

1014

00

12

15

1015

00

00

92

1018

00

00

87

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4015

[kkuiwj [kSjarh

1013

00

05

20

Fkkuk uacj&363

996¼jkLrk½

00

02

32

1012

00

02

77

1011

00

15

62

1000 ¼dsuky½

00

00

69

1010

00

03

84

1002

00

07

43

963

00

00

20

1001

00

00

72

1009

00

06

08

1008

00

00

20

1003

00

08

31

1004

00

03

59

962¼jkLrk½

00

07

60

961

00

05

67

956

00

00

25

957

00

07

08

955

00

00

20

cYyh

1112

00

03

69

Fkkuk uacj&217

1113

00

00

20

1100

00

08

52

1101

00

00

20

1099

00

08

67

1082

00

07

89

1083

00

01

54

1081

00

17

73

1080

00

00

20

1079

00

00

20

999

00

00

20

997¼jkLrk½

00

00

84

996¼jkLrk½

00

04

67

995¼jkLrk½

00

01

44

968

00

05

59

947

00

02

99

940

00

00

20

945

00

05

94

946

00

00

20

944

00

04

99

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4016

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

cYyh

940@1155

00

00

20

Fkkuk uacj&217

941

00

01

23

943

00

03

68

942

00

00

50

935

00

13

44

934

00

05

14

933

00

03

41

415¼jkLrk½

00

01

68

416

00

00

20

399

00

00

20

385¼ukyk½

00

01

85

932

00

00

20

418¼jkLrk½

00

01

07

417

00

05

54

322

00

03

63

321

00

02

61

320

00

02

35

319

00

01

24

318

00

05

52

307

00

08

17

306

00

00

20

309

00

06

90

304

00

10

06

303¼jkLrk½

00

02

40

302

00

06

63

301

00

04

29

300

00

01

22

151

00

01

70

152

00

02

85

154

00

01

64

153

00

05

06

155

00

04

90

156

00

00

20

142

00

04

33

141

00

11

68

145

00

05

30

140

00

08

08

137

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4017

96¼jkLrk½

00

02

49

74

00

03

19

77

00

03

49

78

00

03

76

76

00

00

20

82

00

03

12

79

00

07

00

80

00

05

29

72

00

00

20

81

00

01

78

14

00

35

24

42

00

01

17

41

00

05

80

39@1115

00

02

04

39

00

04

01

38

00

00

20

40

00

00

97

37

00

11

54

14

00

01

05

36

00

18

33

3

00

00

23

ljsvk

909

00

02

22

Fkkuk uacj&218

904

00

08

38

905

00

02

70

906

00

02

41

907

00

03

14

908

00

02

32

897

00

01

65

898

00

11

15

891

00

02

96

834@1334¼lUMh ukyk½

00

05

78

flaxj iÎh

512

00

08

01

Fkkuk uacj&216

508

00

00

20

513

00

03

07

511

00

18

03

514

00

00

20

510

00

00

20

515

00

12

37

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4018

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

516

00

02

07

517

00

00

20

525

00

10

98

524

00

05

28

527

00

00

20

521

00

02

63

523

00

08

71

529

00

00

70

530

00

08

82

522

00

00

20

403

00

04

31

402

00

10

22

399

00

00

20

401

00

04

79

400

00

05

82

391

00

00

20

395

00

01

06

396

00

00

20

394

00

06

53

393

00

03

34

319

00

23

52

313

00

01

48

312

00

00

20

382

00

00

36

383

00

00

20

320

00

09

04

321

00

01

46

267

00

00

20

322

00

05

29

323

00

00

29

266

00

00

66

263

00

10

72

263

00

04

38

258

00

00

20

262

00

01

89

259

00

00

20

261

00

01

50

264

00

00

42

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4019

260

00

00

20

255¼jkLrk½

00

06

05

238

00

02

78

239

00

09

57

240

00

00

20

241

00

02

83

248

00

05

26

242

00

00

20

247

00

03

12

249

00

01

47

247

00

05

34

246

00

03

89

245

00

06

04

101

00

00

20

100

00

06

86

250

00

10

05

34 ¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

01

71

30

00

03

82

31

00

01

39

28¼ukyk½

00

01

41

29¼ukyk½

00

03

41

25

00

04

25

24

00

00

80

23

00

09

89

21

00

08

94

20

00

01

49

22

00

05

61

14

00

00

20

15

00

01

18

16

00

00

20

gluiwjok

730

00

07

58

Fkkuk uacj&302

718

00

06

25

729

00

00

20

717

00

00

20

719

00

10

04

728

00

00

20

720

00

00

52

721

00

08

70

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4020

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

714

00

00

49

722

00

00

20

707

00

02

21

709

00

01

01

708

00

04

71

706

00

03

81

711

00

04

46

704

00

22

14

697

00

00

93

696

00

04

40

698

00

00

47

699

00

00

20

700

00

00

20

701

00

00

20

702

00

00

20

695

00

19

77

694

00

00

20

476

00

06

46

475

00

02

63

474

00

02

91

473

00

03

79

472

00

04

86

55

00

02

56

54

00

09

53

53

00

08

36

52

00

00

20

81

00

00

20

47

00

00

28

46

00

12

60

45

00

05

67

44

00

00

20

1 ¼jkLrk½

00

02

12

epduk

2185

00

03

07

Fkkuk uacj&214

2186

00

00

20

2184

00

00

94

2183

00

01

49

2182

00

03

77

2181

00

03

67

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4021

2180

00

00

20

2179

00

02

70

2177

00

08

03

2178

00

00

20

2161

00

02

46

2163

00

00

20

2164

00

06

14

2165

00

00

28

2160

00

02

67

2159

00

02

52

2158

00

01

45

2148

00

02

49

2147

00

02

04

2145

00

01

96

2143

00

00

20

2144

00

04

80

2135

00

00

20

2136

00

00

20

2137

00

03

57

2129

00

16

48

2128

00

17

35

1362

00

01

68

1363

00

03

45

1365

00

02

03

1366

00

02

09

1361

00

05

59

1360

00

10

40

1359

00

03

31

1357

00

03

84

1356

00

05

51

1355

00

02

20

1354

00

02

07

1318

00

02

40

1317

00

12

06

1306

00

11

21

1210 ¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

01

90

1305

00

17

88

1188 ¼jkLrk½

00

02

30

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4022

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1187

00

00

91

1157 ¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

03

07

1152

00

07

10

1151

00

01

17

1153

00

05

70

1154

00

00

20

1150

00

02

11

1149

00

00

34

1148

00

00

20

1144

00

07

67

1143

00

05

67

1141

00

00

20

1119

00

01

17

1121

00

05

33

1142

00

00

30

1122

00

04

00

1123

00

02

07

1111

00

00

65

1124

00

12

03

1110

00

00

20

1109

00

00

20

1103

00

04

82

1104

00

04

50

1101

00

02

03

1105

00

08

87

1106

00

00

20

1100

00

00

20

idkSfy;k

102

00

00

20

Fkkuk uacj&301

101

00

08

33

100

00

00

20

99

00

03

68

109

00

00

64

98

00

01

89

97

00

02

03

96

00

03

32

110

00

00

20

95

00

05

96

94

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4023

93¼jkLrk½

00

01

16

92

00

00

71

89

00

00

20

91

00

06

70

90

00

05

94

87

00

00

20

86

00

00

20

85

00

00

20

87@797

00

01

12

djkguq

2370

00

08

30

Fkkuk uacj&155

2371

00

00

50

2369

00

05

21

2367

00

05

74

2366

00

12

15

2365

00

02

40

1611

00

01

92

1612

00

04

84

1613

00

02

68

1614

00

07

80

1610

00

00

20

1626

00

11

02

1623

00

00

37

1622

00

00

20

1621

00

00

20

1624

00

01

06

1632

00

00

20

1625

00

02

42

1627

00

00

20

1628

00

00

52

1631

00

00

86

1629

00

12

29

1630

00

00

20

1588

00

00

20

1589

00

00

20

1586

00

04

29

1585

00

08

00

1584

00

02

24

1583

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4024

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1582

00

01

86

1581

00

00

32

1579

00

01

44

1457

00

00

35

1464

00

06

88

1578

00

00

20

1463

00

00

70

1465

00

06

89

1471

00

01

51

1466

00

00

20

1467

00

00

20

1470

00

10

20

1473

00

03

59

1474

00

00

56

1475

00

00

20

1497

00

06

61

1496

00

03

28

1487

00

00

46

1495

00

00

62

1494

00

00

20

1488

00

00

80

1490

00

03

02

1491

00

04

38

1493

00

09

63

1492

00

04

45

1365

00

00

37

1366

00

03

59

1368

00

00

20

1367

00

02

11

1360

00

13

07

975

00

01

48

976

00

00

20

978

00

02

92

979

00

08

96

984

00

02

14

983

00

02

09

982

00

04

44

985

00

00

30

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4025

981

00

03

42

980

00

01

25

989

00

03

35

990

00

11

60

1226

00

00

20

1197

00

03

40

1168

00

10

20

1195

00

03

19

1196

00

00

25

1194

00

06

75

1171

00

00

20

1172

00

00

83

1193

00

01

55

1173

00

06

05

1188

00

04

60

1174

00

00

36

1187

00

03

70

1177

00

00

32

1181

00

14

64

1182

00

03

22

1148

00

09

73

HkSlk [ky

1418

00

04

89

Fkkuk uacj&154

1417

00

01

09

1419

00

00

74

1416

00

01

49

1420

00

00

20

1415

00

01

92

1414

00

01

89

1421

00

00

20

1379

00

01

27

1413

00

01

18

1382

00

00

20

1381

00

00

83

1380

00

02

10

1377

00

00

42

1376

00

03

68

1375

00

04

13

1356

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4026

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1357

00

05

56

1358

00

00

20

1373

00

00

20

1354

00

00

20

1344

00

04

05

1352

00

03

19

1353

00

00

20

1345

00

00

41

1351

00

01

58

1346

00

01

63

1347

00

03

98

1337

00

00

20

1336

00

01

74

1332

00

00

48

1334

00

04

80

1333

00

05

30

1322

00

00

20

1310

00

00

20

1321

00

04

02

1320

00

04

18

1319

00

02

87

1295

00

02

21

1816

00

00

20

1817

00

09

79

1820

00

00

20

1819

00

01

53

1818

00

08

78

975

00

00

20

973

00

07

90

974

00

08

50

969

00

06

22

970

00

00

20

967

00

00

20

968

00

03

74

996

00

00

20

997

00

01

95

998

00

07

14

999

00

02

46

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4027

1001

00

06

19

1002

00

02

21

1000

00

04

49

1003

00

04

65

1004

00

00

78

853¼jkLrk½

00

01

43

1005

00

04

02

1011

00

00

20

1006

00

01

88

1007

00

00

20

909

00

04

76

908

00

00

51

907

00

02

10

906

00

05

23

905

00

06

01

904

00

00

20

1044

00

01

21

903

00

01

42

1045

00

02

29

1046

00

02

60

1047

00

02

23

902

00

04

82

899

00

03

56

898

00

00

20

901

00

01

94

900

00

05

97

872

00

06

65

895

00

00

20

873

00

05

14

875

00

00

26

874

00

00

20

876

00

01

60

870

00

00

20

739

00

23

61

740

00

00

20

674

00

01

44

673

00

01

19

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4028

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

672

00

00

20

671

00

00

20

670

00

00

20

678

00

06

19

677

00

01

13

676

00

00

20

682

00

00

20

679

00

05

23

681

00

00

66

680

00

02

83

684

00

01

11

685

00

02

33

694

00

02

96

693

00

00

20

692

00

00

20

695

00

03

76

696

00

01

91

701

00

00

20

135

00

00

20

136

00

00

20

134

00

01

63

133

00

02

76

697

00

00

20

131

00

00

20

130

00

00

20

132

00

03

08

125

00

01

81

124

00

00

20

126

00

02

01

129

00

00

38

128

00

00

20

127

00

04

61

109

00

00

52

108

00

01

18

89

00

02

07

86

00

00

36

90

00

04

29

87

00

00

20

3196—M-13

Mss. 637 to 676

4028

88

00

00

38

91

00

05

10

107

00

01

83

106

00

00

20

105

00

00

20

96

00

00

20

94

00

00

65

95

00

07

59

97

00

00

49

52

00

02

98

55

00

00

20

56

00

00

20

51

00

02

62

50

00

00

20

53

00

02

16

49

00

00

39

48

00

03

49

47

00

00

20

46

00

03

74

45

00

00

20

41

00

00

20

40

00

02

64

39

00

01

31

38

00

04

33

32

00

00

20

34

00

03

55

35

00

00

20

33

00

04

31

21

00

06

81

22

00

00

58

20

00

05

40

19

00

00

20

4

00

00

32

3

00

00

20

¹iQk- la- vkj&25011@14@2013&vksvkj&Iº

iou oqQekj] voj lfpo

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4029

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

New Delhi, the 27th July, 2013

S.O. 1539.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that a

pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited in Dist. Siwan in the State of Bihar for ‘Patna to Motihari and

Baitalpur Pipeline’ for the transportation of Petroleum Product;

And, whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary

to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which is described in the

Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals

Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention

to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on

which the copies of the notification issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of

India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the

pipeline under the land, to Shri Arun Kumar Jha B.A.S. & Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited. (Pipelines

Division) P.O. Dhelwan, Sipara, Dist. Patna (Bihar.) Pin – 800020.

SCHEDULE

Dist.: Siwan

State : Bihar

Mouja / Village

Survey/BlockNo.

Sub-Div-No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

SAHULI

6335

00

00

59

Thana No-366

6333

00

00

20

6334

00

13

90

5884-SH

00

02

71

6121

00

00

20

6122

00

10

15

6145

00

01

01

6123

00

07

35

6144

00

00

20

6143

00

02

07

6158

00

21

23

6160

00

01

03

6161

00

00

38

6170

00

02

01

6162

00

01

19

6157

00

01

40

6177

00

11

23

6178

00

00

20

6176

00

09

93

6175

00

04

75

6174

00

00

90

6181

00

03

34

6182

00

03

58

6188

00

00

20

6173

00

03

40

6183

00

01

42

4030

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4031

6186

00

02

07

6187

00

00

20

6185

00

05

67

6184

00

06

58

2142

00

00

20

6195

00

00

49

6193

00

00

20

2069

00

01

79

2068

00

00

20

2070

00

01

97

2071

00

00

64

2072

00

03

32

2067

00

00

20

2073

00

02

69

2074

00

03

08

2076

00

00

20

2075

00

05

01

2064

00

02

00

2078

00

01

30

2079

00

01

68

2080

00

10

10

2082

00

01

48

2085

00

03

11

2084

00

07

41

2083

00

15

31

2045

00

00

20

2046

00

00

20

1982

00

04

48

1983

00

00

20

1981

00

02

25

1980

00

01

85

1979

00

07

59

1977

00

00

37

1978

00

04

85

1974

00

08

76

1953

00

00

20

1955

00

10

37

1971

00

00

20

1972

00

00

20

1968

00

00

78

1956

00

04

58

1964

00

01

03

1967

00

03

26

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4032

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1965

00

00

20

1966

00

01

44

1303/6860-road

00

04

80

1927-road

00

00

20

1304

00

07

78

1305

00

00

20

1308/6837

00

00

77

1308/6836

00

05

27

1309

00

04

99

1310

00

02

96

1311

00

09

53

1317

00

03

47

1318

00

06

43

1319

00

05

73

1290

00

21

38

1289

00

00

34

1288

00

07

47

1287

00

00

55

1286

00

05

67

1285

00

09

68

1284

00

03

08

1282

00

00

20

1283

00

00

93

HARIHANS

6574

00

12

80

Thana No.-362

6573

00

00

20

FAZILPUR

1532

00

09

02

Thana No.-364

1531

00

01

91

1526

00

04

35

1525

00

08

04

1519

00

09

44

1518

00

02

23

1517

00

03

25

1513

00

08

48

1514

00

03

25

1511

00

05

15

1515

00

00

56

1509

00

14

19

1510

00

00

20

1496

00

02

50

1508

00

07

04

1499

00

04

15

1498

00

05

93

1497

00

00

63

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4033

1493

00

05

72

1474

00

03

14

1475

00

00

20

1490

00

02

04

1489

00

03

06

1488

00

06

57

1479

00

24

39

1478

00

00

79

1480

00

00

20

1552

00

05

23

1467

00

00

55

1466

00

01

76

1417

00

02

97

1427

00

36

74

1424

00

00

20

1431

00

12

14

1433

00

07

64

1432

00

03

00

1434

00

07

99

1436

00

05

65

1435

00

10

61

1364

00

00

55

1363

00

03

27

1362

00

07

99

1361

00

06

78

1359

00

00

20

1353

00

00

27

1360

00

02

46

1354

00

09

48

1341

00

28

33

1339

00

01

10

1335

00

00

20

1336

00

03

60

1181-Drain

00

02

62

BADHONI

552

00

00

20

Thana No.-365

551

00

04

17

549

00

06

46

550

00

09

73

546

00

00

20

545

00

00

20

544

00

14

43

543

00

00

62

531

00

01

29

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4034

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

KHANPUR KHAIRANTI Thana No.-363

2577

00

00

20

2576

00

11

33

2578

00

01

64

2575

00

07

87

2570

00

14

03

2569

00

11

27

2566

00

09

93

2565

00

07

78

2564

00

14

96

1280

00

00

20

1281

00

00

20

1298

00

05

21

1299

00

04

75

1302

00

01

09

1301

00

01

68

1296

00

00

20

1300

00

00

95

1310

00

04

20

1305

00

00

20

1309

00

19

40

1308

00

07

59

1313

00

12

73

1399

00

02

36

1355

00

06

58

1354

00

00

20

1356

00

00

63

1357

00

02

47

1393

00

00

20

1358

00

07

79

1359

00

04

13

1389

00

09

81

1388

00

05

59

1386

00

04

57

1387

00

00

20

1385

00

08

05

1368

00

00

20

1369

00

00

20

1384

00

11

69

1380

00

08

18

1379

00

01

18

1378

00

00

84

1467-Road

00

01

52

1488

00

04

85

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4035

1030

00

00

20

1489

00

02

62

1029

00

01

59

1023

00

03

28

1028

00

05

85

1027

00

04

51

1026

00

00

20

1025

00

00

20

1024

00

04

79

1020

00

01

09

1048

00

13

83

1019

00

01

57

1014

00

12

15

1015

00

00

92

1018

00

00

87

1013

00

05

20

996-Road

00

02

32

1012

00

02

77

1011

00

15

62

1000-Canal

00

00

69

1010

00

03

84

1002

00

07

43

963

00

00

20

1001

00

00

72

1009

00

06

08

1008

00

00

20

1003

00

08

31

1004

00

03

59

962-Road

00

07

60

961

00

05

67

956

00

00

25

957

00

07

08

955

00

00

20

BALLI

1112

00

03

69

Thana No-217

1113

00

00

20

1100

00

08

52

1101

00

00

20

1099

00

08

67

1082

00

07

89

1083

00

01

54

1081

00

17

73

1080

00

00

20

1079

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4036

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

999

00

00

20

997(ROAD)

00

00

84

996(ROAD)

00

04

67

995(ROAD)

00

01

44

968

00

05

59

947

00

02

99

940

00

00

20

945

00

05

94

946

00

00

20

944

00

04

99

940/1155

00

00

20

941

00

01

23

943

00

03

68

942

00

00

50

935

00

13

44

934

00

05

14

933

00

03

41

415(ROAD)

00

01

68

416

00

00

20

399

00

00

20

385(NALA)

00

01

85

932

00

00

20

418(ROAD)

00

01

07

417

00

05

54

322

00

03

63

321

00

02

61

320

00

02

35

319

00

01

24

318

00

05

52

307

00

08

17

306

00

00

20

309

00

06

90

304

00

10

06

303(ROAD)

00

02

40

302

00

06

63

301

00

04

29

300

00

01

22

151

00

01

70

152

00

02

85

154

00

01

64

153

00

05

06

155

00

04

90

156

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4037

142

00

04

33

141

00

11

68

145

00

05

30

140

00

08

08

137

00

00

20

96(ROAD)

00

02

49

74

00

03

19

77

00

03

49

78

00

03

76

76

00

00

20

82

00

03

12

79

00

07

00

80

00

05

29

72

00

00

20

81

00

01

78

14

00

35

24

42

00

01

17

41

00

05

80

39/1115

00

02

04

39

00

04

01

38

00

00

20

40

00

00

97

37

00

11

54

14

00

01

05

36

00

18

33

3

00

00

23

SAREA

909

00

02

22

Thana No-218

904

00

08

38

905

00

02

70

906

00

02

41

907

00

03

14

908

00

02

32

897

00

01

65

898

00

11

15

891

00

02

96

834/1334 Sandi Nala

00

05

78

SINGAR PATTI

512

00

08

01

Thana No-216

508

00

00

20

513

00

03

07

511

00

18

03

514

00

00

20

510

00

00

20

515

00

12

37

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4038

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

516

00

02

07

517

00

00

20

525

00

10

98

524

00

05

28

527

00

00

20

521

00

02

63

523

00

08

71

529

00

00

70

530

00

08

82

522

00

00

20

403

00

04

31

402

00

10

22

399

00

00

20

401

00

04

79

400

00

05

82

391

00

00

20

395

00

01

06

396

00

00

20

394

00

06

53

393

00

03

34

319

00

23

52

313

00

01

48

312

00

00

20

382

00

00

36

383

00

00

20

320

00

09

04

321

00

01

46

267

00

00

20

322

00

05

29

323

00

00

29

266

00

00

66

263

00

10

72

263

00

04

38

258

00

00

20

262

00

01

89

259

00

00

20

261

00

01

50

264

00

00

42

260

00

00

20

255(ROAD)

00

06

05

238

00

02

78

239

00

09

57

240

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4039

241

00

02

83

248

00

05

26

242

00

00

20

247

00

03

12

249

00

01

47

247

00

05

34

246

00

03

89

245

00

06

04

101

00

00

20

100

00

06

86

250

00

10

05

34 (CART TRACK)

00

01

71

30

00

03

82

31

00

01

39

28(NALA)

00

01

41

29(NALA)

00

03

41

25

00

04

25

24

00

00

80

23

00

09

89

21

00

08

94

20

00

01

49

22

00

05

61

14

00

00

20

15

00

01

18

16

00

00

20

HASANPURWA

730

00

07

58

Thana No-302

718

00

06

25

729

00

00

20

717

00

00

20

719

00

10

04

728

00

00

20

720

00

00

52

721

00

08

70

714

00

00

49

722

00

00

20

707

00

02

21

709

00

01

01

708

00

04

71

706

00

03

81

711

00

04

46

704

00

22

14

697

00

00

93

696

00

04

40

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4040

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

698

00

00

47

699

00

00

20

700

00

00

20

701

00

00

20

702

00

00

20

695

00

19

77

694

00

00

20

476

00

06

46

475

00

02

63

474

00

02

91

473

00

03

79

472

00

04

86

55

00

02

56

54

00

09

53

53

00

08

36

52

00

00

20

81

00

00

20

47

00

00

28

46

00

12

60

45

00

05

67

44

00

00

20

1(ROAD)

00

02

12

MACHAKNA

2185

00

03

07

Thana No-214

2186

00

00

20

2184

00

00

94

2183

00

01

49

2182

00

03

77

2181

00

03

67

2180

00

00

20

2179

00

02

70

2177

00

08

03

2178

00

00

20

2161

00

02

46

2163

00

00

20

2164

00

06

14

2165

00

00

28

2160

00

02

67

2159

00

02

52

2158

00

01

45

2148

00

02

49

2147

00

02

04

2145

00

01

96

2143

00

00

20

2144

00

04

80

2135

00

00

20

2136

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4041

2137

00

03

57

2129

00

16

48

2128

00

17

35

1362

00

01

68

1363

00

03

45

1365

00

02

03

1366

00

02

09

1361

00

05

59

1360

00

10

40

1359

00

03

31

1357

00

03

84

1356

00

05

51

1355

00

02

20

1354

00

02

07

1318

00

02

40

1317

00

12

06

1306

00

11

21

1210 (Cart Track)

00

01

90

1305

00

17

88

1188-road

00

02

30

1187

00

00

91

1157 (Cart Track)

00

03

07

1152

00

07

10

1151

00

01

17

1153

00

05

70

1154

00

00

20

1150

00

02

11

1149

00

00

34

1148

00

00

20

1144

00

07

67

1143

00

05

67

1141

00

00

20

1119

00

01

17

1121

00

05

33

1142

00

00

30

1122

00

04

00

1123

00

02

07

1111

00

00

65

1124

00

12

03

1110

00

00

20

1109

00

00

20

1103

00

04

82

1104

00

04

50

1101

00

02

03

1105

00

08

87

1106

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4042

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1100

00

00

20

PAKOULIYA

102

00

00

20

Thana No-301

101

00

08

33

100

00

00

20

99

00

03

68

109

00

00

64

98

00

01

89

97

00

02

03

96

00

03

32

110

00

00

20

95

00

05

96

94

00

00

20

93(ROAD)

00

01

16

92

00

00

71

89

00

00

20

91

00

06

70

90

00

05

94

87

00

00

20

86

00

00

20

85

00

00

20

87/797

00

01

12

KARAHANU

2370

00

08

30

Thana No-155

2371

00

00

50

2369

00

05

21

2367

00

05

74

2366

00

12

15

2365

00

02

40

1611

00

01

92

1612

00

04

84

1613

00

02

68

1614

00

07

80

1610

00

00

20

1626

00

11

02

1623

00

00

37

1622

00

00

20

1621

00

00

20

1624

00

01

06

1632

00

00

20

1625

00

02

42

1627

00

00

20

1628

00

00

52

1631

00

00

86

1629

00

12

29

1630

00

00

20

1588

00

00

20

1589

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4043

1586

00

04

29

1585

00

08

00

1584

00

02

24

1583

00

00

20

1582

00

01

86

1581

00

00

32

1579

00

01

44

1457

00

00

35

1464

00

06

88

1578

00

00

20

1463

00

00

70

1465

00

06

89

1471

00

01

51

1466

00

00

20

1467

00

00

20

1470

00

10

20

1473

00

03

59

1474

00

00

56

1475

00

00

20

1497

00

06

61

1496

00

03

28

1487

00

00

46

1495

00

00

62

1494

00

00

20

1488

00

00

80

1490

00

03

02

1491

00

04

38

1493

00

09

63

1492

00

04

45

1365

00

00

37

1366

00

03

59

1368

00

00

20

1367

00

02

11

1360

00

13

07

975

00

01

48

976

00

00

20

978

00

02

92

979

00

08

96

984

00

02

14

983

00

02

09

982

00

04

44

985

00

00

30

981

00

03

42

980

00

01

25

989

00

03

35

990

00

11

60

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4044

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1226

00

00

20

1197

00

03

40

1168

00

10

20

1195

00

03

19

1196

00

00

25

1194

00

06

75

1171

00

00

20

1172

00

00

83

1193

00

01

55

1173

00

06

05

1188

00

04

60

1174

00

00

36

1187

00

03

70

1177

00

00

32

1181

00

14

64

1182

00

03

22

1148

00

09

73

BHAISA KHAL

1418

00

04

89

Thana No-154

1417

00

01

09

1419

00

00

74

1416

00

01

49

1420

00

00

20

1415

00

01

92

1414

00

01

89

1421

00

00

20

1379

00

01

27

1413

00

01

18

1382

00

00

20

1381

00

00

83

1380

00

02

10

1377

00

00

42

1376

00

03

68

1375

00

04

13

1356

00

00

20

1357

00

05

56

1358

00

00

20

1373

00

00

20

1354

00

00

20

1344

00

04

05

1352

00

03

19

1353

00

00

20

1345

00

00

41

1351

00

01

58

1346

00

01

63

1347

00

03

98

1337

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4045

1336

00

01

74

1332

00

00

48

1334

00

04

80

1333

00

05

30

1322

00

00

20

1310

00

00

20

1321

00

04

02

1320

00

04

18

1319

00

02

87

1295

00

02

21

1816

00

00

20

1817

00

09

79

1820

00

00

20

1819

00

01

53

1818

00

08

78

975

00

00

20

973

00

07

90

974

00

08

50

969

00

06

22

970

00

00

20

967

00

00

20

968

00

03

74

996

00

00

20

997

00

01

95

998

00

07

14

999

00

02

46

1001

00

06

19

1002

00

02

21

1000

00

04

49

1003

00

04

65

1004

00

00

78

853(ROAD)

00

01

43

1005

00

04

02

1011

00

00

20

1006

00

01

88

1007

00

00

20

909

00

04

76

908

00

00

51

907

00

02

10

906

00

05

23

905

00

06

01

904

00

00

20

1044

00

01

21

903

00

01

42

1045

00

02

29

1046

00

02

60

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4046

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1047

00

02

23

902

00

04

82

899

00

03

56

898

00

00

20

901

00

01

94

900

00

05

97

872

00

06

65

895

00

00

20

873

00

05

14

875

00

00

26

874

00

00

20

876

00

01

60

870

00

00

20

739

00

23

61

740

00

00

20

674

00

01

44

673

00

01

19

672

00

00

20

671

00

00

20

670

00

00

20

678

00

06

19

677

00

01

13

676

00

00

20

682

00

00

20

679

00

05

23

681

00

00

66

680

00

02

83

684

00

01

11

685

00

02

33

694

00

02

96

693

00

00

20

692

00

00

20

695

00

03

76

696

00

01

91

701

00

00

20

135

00

00

20

136

00

00

20

134

00

01

63

133

00

02

76

697

00

00

20

131

00

00

20

130

00

00

20

132

00

03

08

125

00

01

81

124

00

00

20

126

00

02

01

129

00

00

38

128

00

00

20

127

00

04

61

109

00

00

52

108

00

01

18

89

00

02

07

86

00

00

36

90

00

04

29

87

00

00

20

88

00

00

38

91

00

05

10

107

00

01

83

106

00

00

20

105

00

00

20

96

00

00

20

94

00

00

65

95

00

07

59

97

00

00

49

52

00

02

98

55

00

00

20

56

00

00

20

51

00

02

62

50

00

00

20

53

00

02

16

49

00

00

39

48

00

03

49

47

00

00

20

46

00

03

74

45

00

00

20

41

00

00

20

40

00

02

64

39

00

01

31

38

00

04

33

32

00

00

20

34

00

03

55

35

00

00

20

33

00

04

31

21

00

06

81

22

00

00

58

20

00

05

40

19

00

00

20

4

00

00

32

3

00

00

20

[F. No. R-25011/14/2013-OR-I]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4047

ubZ fnYyh] 27 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk-

dk-vk-

dk-vk-

dk-vk-

dk-vk- 1540.—dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slk izrhr gksrk gS fd yksd fgr esa ;g vko”;d gS fd iVuk ls eksfrgkjh vkSj

csrkyiqj rd isVªksfy;e inkFkksZa ds ifjogu gsrq ftyk xksikyxat] jkT; fcgkj esa bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs”ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbiykbu

fcNkbZ tkuh pkfg,A vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slh ikbiykbu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, vko”;d izrhr gksrk gS fd ml Hkwfe esa

ftlds Hkhrj mDr ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkus dk izLrko gS vkSj tks bl vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa of.kZr gS] mi;ksx dk vtZu

fd;k tk,(

vr% vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbUl ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½ vf/kfu;e] 1962 ¼1962

dk 50½ dh /kkjk 3 dh mi&/kkjk¼1½ }kjk iznÙk “kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] mDr Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/akdkj dk vtZu djus ds

vius vk”k; dh ?kks’k.kk djrh gSA

dksbZ O;fDr] tks mDr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa fgrc) gS] ml rkjh[k ls ftldks] Hkkjr ds jkti= esa ;Fkk izdkf”kr bl

vf/klwpuk dh izfr;ka lk/kkj.k turk dks miyC/k djk nh tkrh gS] bDdhl fnu ds vUnj] Hkwfe ds Hkhrj ikbiykbu fcNk, tkus gsrq

mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj ds vtZu ds fy,] Jh v:.k dqekj >k] fc-iz-ls- o l{ke izkf/kdkjh bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs”ku fyfeVsM] ¼ikbiykbu

fMohtu½ iVuk] iks-vks- <syok] flikjk] ftyk iVuk] fiu % 800020] fcgkj dks fyf[kr :i eas vk{ksi Hkst ldsxkA

vuqlwph

ftyk % xksikyxat

jkT; % fcgkj

ekStk@xzke

losZ@Cykd@la- (IyksV la-)

lc&Mho&la-

{ks=kiQy

gsDVs;j

vkjs

oxZ ehVj

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

vtch uxj

1532

00

02

49

Fkkuk uacj&238

1632

00

07

14

1533

00

00

36

1631

00

00

20

1637

00

04

97

1638

00

05

15

1639

00

00

20

1640

00

07

11

1641

00

07

70

1642 jkLrk

00

06

14

793

00

02

95

794

00

12

59

795

00

00

15

796

00

00

20

797

00

00

20

782

00

11

42

786

00

00

20

783

00

00

80

4048

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4049

vtch uxj

781

00

11

42

Fkkuk uacj&238—tkjh

780

00

08

58

770

00

06

86

771

00

00

20

769

00

08

24

695

00

05

42

694

00

03

56

693

00

04

71

696

00

00

20

689

00

04

69

688

00

05

23

687

00

10

33

686

00

09

35

682

00

13

37

683

00

00

20

663

00

10

78

662

00

01

52

661

00

00

20

chykjiqj

255

00

00

20

Fkkuk uacj&282

254

00

12

98

253

00

20

84

251

00

17

63

144

00

09

82

143

00

11

83

136

00

05

85

135

00

06

80

128

00

00

20

127

00

00

20

129

00

25

05

126

00

03

59

125

00

09

28

124

00

07

84

'kkeiqj

405

00

11

08

Fkkuk uacj&279

406 dPpk jkLrk

00

00

68

407

00

20

27

408

00

00

20

429@2114

00

03

31

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4050

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

'kkeiqj

389

00

00

20

Fkkuk uacj&279&tkjh

431

00

05

80

430

00

01

19

433

00

02

73

432

00

05

23

388

00

00

20

387

00

00

20

386

00

00

20

434

00

12

29

435

00

00

28

348

00

04

27

344

00

03

89

337

00

07

74

339

00

01

62

338

00

03

46

326

00

02

03

325

00

03

57

340

00

00

64

324

00

03

34

327

00

01

52

323

00

03

27

322

00

01

70

321

00

01

85

318

00

03

87

317

00

03

68

316

00

03

66

315

00

03

27

314

00

03

10

313

00

03

15

312

00

03

84

311

00

02

09

310

00

03

47

579

00

00

20

309

00

03

59

308

00

02

64

581

00

00

20

307

00

03

52

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4051

'kkeiqj

583

00

00

51

Fkkuk uacj&279&tkjh

580

00

00

20

306

00

03

50

584

00

01

39

302

00

02

01

585

00

02

84

301

00

00

75

588

00

02

07

589

00

02

36

590

00

02

11

297

00

00

20

591

00

03

08

296

00

02

22

295

00

02

28

294

00

02

06

293

00

00

20

292

00

02

92

94

00

04

93

93

00

05

35

92

00

04

40

88

00

03

80

87

00

04

68

86

00

06

78

698

00

00

20

708

00

00

20

85

00

03

48

64

00

04

87

63

00

03

10

709

00

00

80

721

00

02

76

722

00

02

52

723

00

04

72

61

00

00

28

729

00

05

68

58

00

00

20

57

00

00

20

56

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4052

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

'kkeiqj

55

00

00

20

Fkkuk uacj&279&tkjh

54

00

00

20

730

00

05

62

731

00

05

22

732

00

00

20

745

00

05

21

746

00

05

60

743

00

00

20

747

00

11

27

748

00

06

45

751

00

00

47

750

00

01

07

749

00

01

15

763@2126 dPpk jkLrk

00

01

46

cq?klh

2083 dPpk jkLrk

00

01

40

Fkkuk uacj&278

1985

00

06

20

2013

00

06

55

2012

00

16

43

2009

00

00

20

1988

00

07

15

2007

00

00

44

1995

00

07

21

1996

00

00

20

1994

00

05

57

1993

00

00

20

1992

00

00

20

1998

00

03

94

1997

00

13

69

1999

00

05

98

2004

00

02

45

2005

00

00

20

2000

00

01

69

2003

00

13

41

2002

00

09

45

2001

00

00

20

1678

00

12

10

1677

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4053

cq?klh

1632

00

02

96

Fkkuk uacj&278&tkjh

1681

00

03

78

1682

00

00

95

1683

00

00

20

1631

00

06

33

1627

00

08

99

1626

00

07

53

1625

00

00

20

1585

00

13

37

1584

00

02

64

1583

00

04

69

1581

00

11

00

1580

00

01

63

1579

00

01

07

1578

00

04

84

1526

00

08

73

1500

00

08

26

1499

00

08

76

1489

00

05

07

1488

00

00

64

1490

00

03

21

1491

00

00

20

1492

00

02

85

1487

00

15

52

1485

00

00

20

1486

00

00

20

1261

00

00

20

1212

00

02

29

1259

00

00

78

1260 dPpk jkLrk

00

01

21

1158 dPpk jkLrk

00

01

07

1232

00

14

66

1233

00

04

14

1234

00

03

49

1235

00

03

59

1238

00

08

26

1241

00

03

61

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4054

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

cq?klh

1243

00

03

66

Fkkuk uacj&278&tkjh

1247

00

03

60

1246

00

05

81

1249

00

01

67

1250

00

01

30

1251

00

03

40

1252

00

03

20

1253

00

03

54

1254

00

03

41

1256

00

12

04

1258

00

04

04

660

00

04

04

659

00

03

76

658

00

02

67

656

00

02

39

655

00

00

20

654

00

02

72

653

00

02

57

613

00

05

60

623

00

06

08

622

00

00

20

621

00

00

20

627

00

03

10

626

00

02

26

607

00

01

13

631

00

03

35

632

00

01

61

633

00

07

01

634

00

06

58

635

00

00

20

603

00

00

20

604

00

00

20

581 jkLrk

00

01

43

569

00

00

20

567

00

01

64

568

00

02

68

563

00

00

79

562

00

01

79

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4055

cq?klh

560

00

08

08

Fkkuk uacj&278&tkjh

559

00

00

20

561

00

02

95

lh?kokyh;k

304

00

00

97

Fkkuk uacj&365

303

00

06

06

295

00

00

31

297

00

02

03

298

00

03

00

300

00

01

96

296

00

03

75

311

00

10

53

312

00

01

59

287

00

11

17

286

00

12

30

272

00

03

64

271

00

00

20

314

00

00

20

270

00

06

99

273

00

02

57

243

00

01

90

252

00

16

76

251

00

00

20

253

00

05

37

254

00

01

61

207

00

06

76

206

00

00

20

204

00

03

10

203

00

00

20

205

00

09

20

380

00

00

20

201

00

03

95

381

00

02

25

200

00

00

85

198

00

00

20

574

00

03

45

576

00

08

35

575

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4056

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

lh?kokyh;k

577

00

02

03

Fkkuk uacj&365&tkjh

578

00

00

20

579

00

00

20

583

00

11

56

572

00

06

31

582

00

00

20

571

00

01

21

570

00

00

20

564

00

00

20

584

00

11

32

602

00

01

72

603

00

06

17

604

00

00

20

605 jkLrk

00

03

56

613

00

00

37

610

00

01

60

609

00

03

34

606

00

06

60

607

00

04

57

608

00

00

20

eaxksyiqj

1457

00

01

67

Fkkuk uacj&367

1458

00

12

64

1452

00

00

20

Hkkstiqjok

307

00

06

80

Fkkuk uacj&366

306

00

07

90

315

00

09

03

312

00

00

20

314

00

00

36

316

00

08

39

317

00

04

61

322

00

05

71

321

00

06

31

323

00

03

07

320

00

05

80

279

00

00

20

319

00

02

65

324

00

05

45

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4057

Hkkstiqjok

278

00

01

03

Fkkuk uacj&366&tkjh

325

00

09

32

277

00

03

91

326

00

00

44

276

00

07

27

275

00

00

20

265 dPpk jkLrk

00

03

92

261

00

05

99

262

00

05

67

260

00

00

67

257

00

00

39

258

00

04

92

226

00

15

13

256

00

00

20

225

00

00

20

227

00

06

43

229

00

08

23

231

00

07

99

228

00

00

20

232

00

08

32

239

00

03

97

238

00

00

98

241

00

05

01

373

00

00

20

374

00

01

34

379

00

06

63

387

00

16

77

394

00

03

23

397

00

00

20

393

00

04

20

395

00

00

20

421¼jkLrk½

00

02

02

422 ¼jkLrk½

00

01

86

423 ¼jkLrk½

00

02

50

522

00

01

54

521

00

02

00

523

00

02

00

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4058

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Hkkstiqjok

524

00

01

92

Fkkuk uacj&366&tkjh

526

00

25

74

496

00

00

20

497

00

02

21

494

00

00

20

498

00

03

77

505

00

00

20

499

00

05

61

500

00

00

20

487

00

09

52

485

00

00

20

440

00

01

29

486

00

10

60

444

00

05

39

484

00

00

20

445

00

13

94

446

00

00

20

447

00

14

31

451

00

00

20

443

00

12

05

452

00

07

34

453

00

11

23

454

00

08

86

456

00

01

08

454@549

00

01

84

458

00

10

22

459

00

02

08

462

00

01

33

460

00

08

71

Vsdusokl

484¼jkLrk½

00

04

50

Fkkuk uacj&362

515

00

02

49

516

00

09

47

517

00

00

20

512

00

08

68

513

00

00

20

514

00

00

20

511

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4059

Vsdusokl

518

00

08

56

Fkkuk uacj&362&tkjh

519

00

03

81

520

00

01

62

521

00

05

09

522

00

00

20

568

00

00

29

559

00

03

14

560

00

00

20

558

00

00

61

556

00

04

19

557

00

04

53

974 ¼jkLrk½

00

01

12

764 ¼jkLrk½

00

01

19

975 ¼jkLrk½

00

00

95

768

00

00

47

778

00

05

86

777

00

01

58

772

00

00

20

769

00

18

18

766

00

00

20

767

00

01

28

dVs[kkl

323

00

01

73

Fkkuk uacj&396

317

00

13

57

316

00

01

23

312

00

11

33

315

00

00

20

314

00

00

20

313

00

00

20

310

00

00

20

311

00

01

46

306

00

14

09

305

00

00

20

16

00

07

42

298

00

01

29

296

00

00

20

297

00

04

79

17 dPpk jkLrk

00

03

23

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4060

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

dVs[kkl

18

00

03

89

Fkkuk uacj&396

266

00

00

20

265

00

00

94

264

00

03

26

261

00

00

20

19

00

00

20

263

00

04

96

262

00

05

85

268

00

01

44

255

00

05

92

254

00

02

47

253

00

01

74

256

00

11

22

84

00

00

20

259

00

01

94

83

00

01

48

81

00

09

49

69

00

00

20

80

00

02

36

87

00

00

20

79

00

01

52

78

00

08

09

77

00

03

95

91

00

11

36

76

00

00

20

92

00

00

42

93

00

06

98

100

00

06

68

102

00

17

57

103

00

00

20

104

00

09

31

111@816

00

02

22

egEeniqj

2549 ¼jkLrk½

00

03

13

Fkkuk uacj&370

2539

00

00

20

2538

00

00

20

2540

00

01

87

2541

00

06

53

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4061

egEeniqj

2548

00

00

57

Fkkuk uacj&370&tkjh

2546

00

08

25

2547

00

00

20

2545

00

03

98

2544

00

03

60

2542

00

01

13

2535

00

00

20

2543

00

01

36

2551

00

01

67

2552

00

00

20

2534

00

10

54

2554

00

02

52

2553

00

00

20

2526

00

01

15

2555

00

03

41

2556

00

00

20

2557

00

03

55

2559

00

00

20

2524

00

12

92

2558

00

00

28

2607

00

00

20

2606

00

01

46

2608

00

00

92

2605

00

04

30

2604

00

00

41

2609

00

00

20

2610

00

00

20

2612

00

05

96

2614

00

07

40

2615

00

01

63

2618

00

00

50

2617

00

07

94

2624

00

00

46

2619

00

00

20

2620

00

00

20

2625

00

04

56

2623

00

05

46

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4062

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

egEeniqj

2621

00

00

20

Fkkuk uacj&370&tkjh

2735

00

00

20

2622

00

00

31

2626

00

05

68

2633 ¼jkLrk½

00

01

05

2732

00

14

71

2734

00

00

20

2729

00

00

20

2730

00

10

71

2728

00

01

88

2726

00

05

81

2727

00

07

92

2750

00

05

50

2749

00

08

53

2784

00

05

29

2751

00

03

19

2752

00

01

95

2753

00

00

64

2783

00

00

20

2754

00

03

52

2755

00

00

20

2780

00

00

20

2782

00

09

58

2781

00

00

72

2840

00

01

79

2841

00

07

54

2842

00

00

20

3213 dPpk jkLrk

00

01

35

2874

00

00

26

2876

00

00

20

2873

00

03

20

2872

00

04

72

2871

00

01

17

2869

00

00

99

2868

00

00

20

2870

00

05

00

2863

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4063

egEeniqj

2867

00

01

58

Fkkuk uacj&370&tkjh

2866

00

04

55

2864

00

01

39

2865

00

10

44

2861

00

03

34

3213 dPpk jkLrk

00

02

35

2858

00

00

20

2860

00

07

55

2859

00

00

20

2923

00

00

20

3317 dPpk jkLrk

00

01

05

3308

00

03

12

3307

00

02

97

3309

00

00

29

3305

00

05

29

3306

00

00

20

3304

00

02

15

3310

00

02

88

3311

00

00

20

3301

00

01

91

3297

00

00

20

3300

00

03

24

3299

00

00

20

3298

00

06

25

3290

00

05

75

3291

00

04

52

3289

00

03

26

3292

00

00

50

3280

00

00

20

3287

00

06

32

3283

00

00

20

3284

00

00

70

3286

00

08

40

3285

00

01

14

3334

00

10

88

3268

00

00

20

3335

00

09

59

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4064

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

egEeniqj

3336

00

00

20

Fkkuk uacj&370&tkjh

3267

00

11

10

3266

00

00

20

3265

00

08

46

3375

00

02

08

3380

00

03

88

3381

00

00

20

3379

00

05

95

3377

00

01

09

3384

00

04

10

3385

00

04

59

3386

00

03

55

3387

00

10

74

3388

00

08

90

3390

00

00

20

3391

00

00

20

3389

00

04

75

ihijk

316

00

04

97

Fkkuk uacj&388

319

00

07

47

321

00

00

33

312

00

00

20

322

00

04

02

323

00

05

46

318

00

00

20

324

00

02

68

325

00

00

20

326

00

00

20

303&jkLrk

00

02

69

175

00

06

69

176

00

00

20

174

00

09

95

172&vsu-vsp-28

00

08

89

173&vsu-vsp-28

00

04

67

171

00

00

55

170

00

03

76

169

00

08

04

168

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4065

ihijk

164

00

03

87

Fkkuk uacj&388&tkjh

165

00

06

33

162

00

00

20

163

00

15

76

159

00

01

97

129

00

01

83

128

00

07

76

124

00

04

38

125

00

03

44

dk'kh Vsaxjkgh

47

00

00

20

Fkkuk uacj&371

46

00

01

82

38

00

07

39

39

00

00

20

37

00

05

40

36

00

04

70

34

00

02

26

28

00

02

85

29

00

05

29

30

00

01

25

31

00

04

89

32

00

01

43

5

00

04

84

10

00

06

97

6

00

00

26

11

00

00

20

9

00

00

51

8

00

05

26

7

00

02

15

12

00

00

20

13

00

14

89

xksikyiqj

791

00

11

32

Fkkuk uacj&389

783

00

11

22

779

00

00

20

780

00

09

47

782

00

00

20

781

00

02

33

777

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4066

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

gjiqj Vsaxjkgh

2557

00

00

20

Fkkuk uacj&387

2555

00

01

30

2553

00

05

30

2554

00

00

20

2510

00

00

36

2512

00

00

20

2509

00

09

95

2508

00

01

10

2504

00

00

20

2505

00

04

12

2503

00

08

94

2496

00

14

82

2606

00

00

85

2607

00

02

49

2608

00

05

08

2609

00

04

42

2612

00

05

10

2613

00

02

34

2614

00

05

79

2611

00

04

65

2672

00

07

63

2673

00

00

20

2671

00

05

08

2670

00

11

55

2667

00

02

36

2669

00

00

20

2665

00

01

01

2666

00

04

93

2152

00

06

62

2170

00

14

49

2153

00

32

49

2159

00

11

72

490

00

00

20

489

00

04

21

492

00

00

20

487

00

01

97

488

00

03

54

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4067

gjiqj Vsaxjkgh

486

00

02

42

Fkkuk uacj&387&tkjh

497

00

03

12

483

00

00

20

498

00

03

26

501

00

01

17

502

00

00

20

482

00

00

20

481

00

03

66

480

00

04

92

470

00

02

86

479

00

00

20

472

00

05

01

473

00

02

80

476

00

00

20

474

00

01

76

471

00

00

20

475

00

15

83

453

00

00

20

602¼jkLrk½

00

02

51

603¼jkLrk½

00

00

20

601

00

05

88

604

00

07

61

608

00

01

01

609

00

00

20

605

00

00

66

606

00

01

66

607

00

03

55

612

00

05

93

611

00

02

97

610

00

02

56

628

00

02

01

626

00

07

75

627

00

00

20

636

00

06

82

637

00

04

16

638

00

03

01

647

00

05

92

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4068

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

gjiqj Vsaxjkgh

648

00

00

20

Fkkuk uacj&387&tkjh

649

00

00

20

646

00

01

40

645

00

03

32

644

00

03

16

643

00

03

29

654

00

03

69

653

00

00

20

658

00

01

82

659

00

02

08

660

00

03

77

663

00

02

65

664

00

00

72

1754

00

03

33

1753

00

01

67

1743

00

04

77

1745

00

01

41

1741

00

01

01

2877 ¼jkLrk½

00

01

36

799 ¼jkLrk½

00

02

53

2879 ¼jkLrk½

00

02

18

1523

00

12

34

1526

00

00

20

1527

00

05

63

1522

00

05

89

1529

00

06

06

1530

00

03

71

1532

00

14

53

1533

00

02

61

1504

00

01

06

1501

00

09

96

1500

00

04

36

1499

00

01

21

1555

00

00

20

1498

00

07

09

1497

00

11

22

rsankliqj

601

00

09

61

Fkkuk uacj&464

599

00

03

04

598

00

01

38

597

00

04

99

551

00

04

92

454

00

00

20

552

00

05

09

593

00

00

20

553

00

02

16

554

00

03

68

555

00

00

65

587

00

03

85

586

00

00

69

574

00

04

34

575

00

08

82

585

00

00

20

582

00

05

06

576

00

01

19

573

00

00

20

577

00

05

24

578

00

00

28

500 ¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

01

37

424&xaMd unh

00

20

60

432&xaMd unh

00

03

79

433&xaMd unh

00

04

19

431&xaMd unh

00

00

20

434&xaMd unh

00

00

72

436&xaMd unh

00

05

88

437&xaMd unh

00

02

32

438&xaMd unh

00

00

22

439&xaMd unh

00

00

20

441&xaMd unh

00

00

20

442&xaMd unh

00

00

20

466&xaMd unh

00

09

33

[Qk- la- vkj&25011@19@2013&vksvkj&I]

iou dqekj] voj lfpo

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4069

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

New Delhi, the 27th July, 2013

S.O. 1540.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that a

pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited in Dist. Gopalgunj in the State of Bihar for 'Patna to Motihari

and Baitalpur Pipeline for the transportation of Petroleum Product;

And, whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is

necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which is

described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and

Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby

declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on

which the copies of the notification issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the

Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein

for laying of the pipeline under the land, to Shri Arun Kumar Jha B.A.S. & Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation

Limited. (Pipelines Division) P.O. Dhelwan, Sipara, Dist. Patna (Bihar.) Pin-800020.

SCHEDULE

Dist.: Gopalgunj

State : Bihar

Mouja / Village

Survey/BlockNo.

Sub-Div- No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

AJBI NAGAR

1532

00

02

49

Thana Number : 283

1632

00

07

14

1533

00

00

36

1631

00

00

20

1637

00

04

97

1638

00

05

15

1639

00

00

20

1640

00

07

11

1641

00

07

70

1642-ROAD

00

06

14

793

00

02

95

794

00

12

59

795

00

00

15

796

00

00

20

797

00

00

20

782

00

11

42

786

00

00

20

783

00

00

80

781

00

11

42

780

00

08

58

770

00

06

86

771

00

00

20

769

00

08

24

695

00

05

42

694

00

03

56

693

00

04

71

4070

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4071

AJBI NAGAR

696

00

00

20

Thana Number : 283—Contd.

689

00

04

69

688

00

05

23

687

00

10

33

686

00

09

35

682

00

13

37

683

00

00

20

663

00

10

78

662

00

01

52

661

00

00

20

BILARPUR

255

00

00

20

Thana Number : 282

254

00

12

98

253

00

20

84

251

00

17

63

144

00

09

82

143

00

11

83

136

00

05

85

135

00

06

80

128

00

00

20

127

00

00

20

129

00

25

05

126

00

03

59

125

00

09

28

124

00

07

84

405

00

11

08

SHAMPUR

406

Thana Number : 279

(CART TRACK)

00

00

68

407

00

20

27

408

00

00

20

429/2114

00

03

31

389

00

00

20

431

00

05

80

430

00

01

19

433

00

02

73

432

00

05

23

388

00

00

20

387

00

00

20

386

00

00

20

434

00

12

29

435

00

00

28

348

00

04

27

344

00

03

89

337

00

07

74

339

00

01

62

338

00

03

46

326

00

02

03

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4072

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

SHAMPUR

325

00

03

57

Thana Number : 279—Contd.

340

00

00

64

324

00

03

34

327

00

01

52

323

00

03

27

322

00

01

70

321

00

01

85

318

00

03

87

317

00

03

68

316

00

03

66

315

00

03

27

314

00

03

10

313

00

03

15

312

00

03

84

311

00

02

09

310

00

03

47

579

00

00

20

309

00

03

59

308

00

02

64

581

00

00

20

307

00

03

52

583

00

00

51

580

00

00

20

306

00

03

50

584

00

01

39

302

00

02

01

585

00

02

84

301

00

00

75

588

00

02

07

589

00

02

36

590

00

02

11

297

00

00

20

591

00

03

08

296

00

02

22

295

00

02

28

294

00

02

06

293

00

00

20

292

00

02

92

94

00

04

93

93

00

05

35

92

00

04

40

88

00

03

80

87

00

04

68

86

00

06

78

698

00

00

20

708

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4073

SHAMPUR

85

00

03

48

Thana Number :279—Contd.

64

00

04

87

63

00

03

10

709

00

00

80

721

00

02

76

722

00

02

52

723

00

04

72

61

00

00

28

729

00

05

68

58

00

00

20

57

00

00

20

56

00

00

20

55

00

00

20

54

00

00

20

730

00

05

62

731

00

05

22

732

00

00

20

745

00

05

21

746

00

05

60

743

00

00

20

747

00

11

27

748

00

06

45

751

00

00

47

750

00

01

07

749

00

01

15

763/2126

(CART TRACK)

00

01

46

2083

BUDHSI

(CART TRACK)

00

01

40

Thana No. :- 278

1985

00

06

20

2013

00

06

55

2012

00

16

43

2009

00

00

20

1988

00

07

15

2007

00

00

44

1995

00

07

21

1996

00

00

20

1994

00

05

57

1993

00

00

20

1992

00

00

20

1998

00

03

94

1997

00

13

69

1999

00

05

98

2004

00

02

45

2005

00

00

20

2000

00

01

69

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4074

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

BUDHSI

2003

00

13

41

Thana No. :- 278—Contd.

2002

00

09

45

2001

00

00

20

1678

00

12

10

1677

00

00

20

1632

00

02

96

1681

00

03

78

1682

00

00

95

1683

00

00

20

1631

00

06

33

1627

00

08

99

1626

00

07

53

1625

00

00

20

1585

00

13

37

1584

00

02

64

1583

00

04

69

1581

00

11

00

1580

00

01

63

1579

00

01

07

1578

00

04

84

1526

00

08

73

1500

00

08

26

1499

00

08

76

1489

00

05

07

1488

00

00

64

1490

00

03

21

1491

00

00

20

1492

00

02

85

1487

00

15

52

1485

00

00

20

1486

00

00

20

1261

00

00

20

1212

00

02

29

1259

00

00

78

1260

(CART TRACK)

00

01

21

1158

(CART TRACK)

00

01

07

1232

00

14

66

1233

00

04

14

1234

00

03

49

1235

00

03

59

1238

00

08

26

1241

00

03

61

1243

00

03

66

1247

00

03

60

1246

00

05

81

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4075

BUDHSI

1249

00

01

67

Thana No. :- 278—Contd.

1250

00

01

30

1251

00

03

40

1252

00

03

20

1253

00

03

54

1254

00

03

41

1256

00

12

04

1258

00

04

04

660

00

04

04

659

00

03

76

658

00

02

67

656

00

02

39

655

00

00

20

654

00

02

72

653

00

02

57

613

00

05

60

623

00

06

08

622

00

00

20

621

00

00

20

627

00

03

10

626

00

02

26

607

00

01

13

631

00

03

35

632

00

01

61

633

00

07

01

634

00

06

58

635

00

00

20

603

00

00

20

604

00

00

20

581(ROAD)

00

01

43

569

00

00

20

567

00

01

64

568

00

02

68

563

00

00

79

562

00

01

79

560

00

08

08

559

00

00

20

561

00

02

95

SIDHWALIA

304

00

00

97

Thana Number :365

303

00

06

06

295

00

00

31

297

00

02

03

298

00

03

00

300

00

01

96

296

00

03

75

311

00

10

53

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4076

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

SIDHWALIA

312

00

01

59

Thana Number :365—Contd.

287

00

11

17

286

00

12

30

272

00

03

64

271

00

00

20

314

00

00

20

270

00

06

99

273

00

02

57

243

00

01

90

252

00

16

76

251

00

00

20

253

00

05

37

254

00

01

61

207

00

06

76

206

00

00

20

204

00

03

10

203

00

00

20

205

00

09

20

380

00

00

20

201

00

03

95

381

00

02

25

200

00

00

85

198

00

00

20

574

00

03

45

576

00

08

35

575

00

00

20

577

00

02

03

578

00

00

20

579

00

00

20

583

00

11

56

572

00

06

31

582

00

00

20

571

00

01

21

570

00

00

20

564

00

00

20

584

00

11

32

602

00

01

72

603

00

06

17

604

00

00

20

605(ROAD)

00

03

56

613

00

00

37

610

00

01

60

609

00

03

34

606

00

06

60

607

00

04

57

608

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4077

MANGOLPUR

1457

00

01

67

Thana Number :367

1458

00

12

64

1452

00

00

20

BHOJPURWA

307

00

06

80

Thana Number :366

306

00

07

90

315

00

09

03

312

00

00

20

314

00

00

36

316

00

08

39

317

00

04

61

322

00

05

71

321

00

06

31

323

00

03

07

320

00

05

80

279

00

00

20

319

00

02

65

324

00

05

45

278

00

01

03

325

00

09

32

277

00

03

91

326

00

00

44

276

00

07

27

275

00

00

20

265 (Cart track)

00

03

92

261

00

05

99

262

00

05

67

260

00

00

67

257

00

00

39

258

00

04

92

226

00

15

13

256

00

00

20

225

00

00

20

227

00

06

43

229

00

08

23

231

00

07

99

228

00

00

20

232

00

08

32

239

00

03

97

238

00

00

98

241

00

05

01

373

00

00

20

374

00

01

34

379

00

06

63

387

00

16

77

394

00

03

23

397

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4078

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

BHOJPURWA

393

00

04

20

Thana Number :366—Contd.

395

00

00

20

421(Road)

00

02

02

422 (Road)

00

01

86

423 (Road)

00

02

50

522

00

01

54

521

00

02

00

523

00

02

00

524

00

01

92

526

00

25

74

496

00

00

20

497

00

02

21

494

00

00

20

498

00

03

77

505

00

00

20

499

00

05

61

500

00

00

20

487

00

09

52

485

00

00

20

440

00

01

29

486

00

10

60

444

00

05

39

484

00

00

20

445

00

13

94

446

00

00

20

447

00

14

31

451

00

00

20

443

00

12

05

452

00

07

34

453

00

11

23

454

00

08

86

456

00

01

08

454/549

00

01

84

458

00

10

22

459

00

02

08

462

00

01

33

460

00

08

71

TEKNEWAS

484(ROAD)

00

04

50

Thana Number :362

515

00

02

49

516

00

09

47

517

00

00

20

512

00

08

68

513

00

00

20

514

00

00

20

511

00

00

20

518

00

08

56

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4079

TEKNEWAS

519

00

03

81

Thana Number :362—Contd.

520

00

01

62

521

00

05

09

522

00

00

20

568

00

00

29

559

00

03

14

560

00

00

20

558

00

00

61

556

00

04

19

557

00

04

53

974 (ROAD)

00

01

12

764 (ROAD)

00

01

19

975 (ROAD)

00

00

95

768

00

00

47

778

00

05

86

777

00

01

58

772

00

00

20

769

00

18

18

766

00

00

20

767

00

01

28

KATEAKHAS

323

00

01

73

Thana Number : 396

317

00

13

57

316

00

01

23

312

00

11

33

315

00

00

20

314

00

00

20

313

00

00

20

310

00

00

20

311

00

01

46

306

00

14

09

305

00

00

20

16

00

07

42

298

00

01

29

296

00

00

20

297

00

04

79

17 (Cart Track)

00

03

23

18

00

03

89

266

00

00

20

265

00

00

94

264

00

03

26

261

00

00

20

19

00

00

20

263

00

04

96

262

00

05

85

268

00

01

44

255

00

05

92

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4080

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

KATEAKHAS

254

00

02

47

Thana Number :396—Contd.

253

00

01

74

256

00

11

22

84

00

00

20

259

00

01

94

83

00

01

48

81

00

09

49

69

00

00

20

80

00

02

36

87

00

00

20

79

00

01

52

78

00

08

09

77

00

03

95

91

00

11

36

76

00

00

20

92

00

00

42

93

00

06

98

100

00

06

68

102

00

17

57

103

00

00

20

104

00

09

31

111/816

00

02

22

MAHAMMADPUR

2549 (ROAD)

00

03

13

Thana Number :370

2539

00

00

20

2538

00

00

20

2540

00

01

87

2541

00

06

53

2548

00

00

57

2546

00

08

25

2547

00

00

20

2545

00

03

98

2544

00

03

60

2542

00

01

13

2535

00

00

20

2543

00

01

36

2551

00

01

67

2552

00

00

20

2534

00

10

54

2554

00

02

52

2553

00

00

20

2526

00

01

15

2555

00

03

41

2556

00

00

20

2557

00

03

55

2559

00

00

20

2524

00

12

92

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4081

MAHAMMADPUR

2558

00

00

28

Thana Number :370

2607

00

00

20

2606

00

01

46

2608

00

00

92

2605

00

04

30

2604

00

00

41

2609

00

00

20

2610

00

00

20

2612

00

05

96

2614

00

07

40

2615

00

01

63

2618

00

00

50

2617

00

07

94

2624

00

00

46

2619

00

00

20

2620

00

00

20

2625

00

04

56

2623

00

05

46

2621

00

00

20

2735

00

00

20

2622

00

00

31

2626

00

05

68

2633 (ROAD)

00

01

05

2732

00

14

71

2734

00

00

20

2729

00

00

20

2730

00

10

71

2728

00

01

88

2726

00

05

81

2727

00

07

92

2750

00

05

50

2749

00

08

53

2784

00

05

29

2751

00

03

19

2752

00

01

95

2753

00

00

64

2783

00

00

20

2754

00

03

52

2755

00

00

20

2780

00

00

20

2782

00

09

58

2781

00

00

72

2840

00

01

79

2841

00

07

54

2842

00

00

20

3213 (CART TRACK)

00

01

35

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4082

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

MAHAMMADPUR

2874

00

00

26

Thana Number :370

2876

00

00

20

2873

00

03

20

2872

00

04

72

2871

00

01

17

2869

00

00

99

2868

00

00

20

2870

00

05

00

2863

00

00

20

2867

00

01

58

2866

00

04

55

2864

00

01

39

2865

00

10

44

2861

00

03

34

3213 (CART TRACK)

00

02

35

2858

00

00

20

2860

00

07

55

2859

00

00

20

2923

00

00

20

3317 (CART TRACK)

00

01

05

3308

00

03

12

3307

00

02

97

3309

00

00

29

3305

00

05

29

3306

00

00

20

3304

00

02

15

3310

00

02

88

3311

00

00

20

3301

00

01

91

3297

00

00

20

3300

00

03

24

3299

00

00

20

3298

00

06

25

3290

00

05

75

3291

00

04

52

3289

00

03

26

3292

00

00

50

3280

00

00

20

3287

00

06

32

3283

00

00

20

3284

00

00

70

3286

00

08

40

3285

00

01

14

3334

00

10

88

3268

00

00

20

3335

00

09

59

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4083

MAHAMMADPUR

3336

00

00

20

Thana Number :370—Contd.

3267

00

11

10

3266

00

00

20

3265

00

08

46

3375

00

02

08

3380

00

03

88

3381

00

00

20

3379

00

05

95

3377

00

01

09

3384

00

04

10

3385

00

04

59

3386

00

03

55

3387

00

10

74

3388

00

08

90

3390

00

00

20

3391

00

00

20

3389

00

04

75

PIPRA

316

00

04

97

Thana Number:388

319

00

07

47

321

00

00

33

312

00

00

20

322

00

04

02

323

00

05

46

318

00

00

20

324

00

02

68

325

00

00

20

326

00

00

20

303-Road

00

02

69

175

00

06

69

176

00

00

20

174

00

09

95

172-NH28

00

08

89

173-NH28

00

04

67

171

00

00

55

170

00

03

76

169

00

08

04

168

00

00

20

164

00

03

87

165

00

06

33

162

00

00

20

163

00

15

76

159

00

01

97

129

00

01

83

128

00

07

76

124

00

04

38

125

00

03

44

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4084

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

KASI TENGRAHI Thana Number:371

47

00

00

20

46

00

01

82

38

00

07

39

39

00

00

20

37

00

05

40

36

00

04

70

34

00

02

26

28

00

02

85

29

00

05

29

30

00

01

25

31

00

04

89

32

00

01

43

5

00

04

84

10

00

06

97

6

00

00

26

11

00

00

20

9

00

00

51

8

00

05

26

7

00

02

15

12

00

00

20

13

00

14

89

GOPALPUR

791

00

11

32

Thana Number:389

783

00

11

22

779

00

00

20

780

00

09

47

782

00

00

20

781

00

02

33

777

00

00

20

HARPUR TENGRAHI

2557

00

00

20

Thana Number: 387

2555

00

01

30

2553

00

05

30

2554

00

00

20

2510

00

00

36

2512

00

00

20

2509

00

09

95

2508

00

01

10

2504

00

00

20

2505

00

04

12

2503

00

08

94

2496

00

14

82

2606

00

00

85

2607

00

02

49

2608

00

05

08

2609

00

04

42

2612

00

05

10

2613

00

02

34

2614

00

05

79

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4085

HARPUR TENGRAHI

2611

00

04

65

Thana Number:387—Contd.

2672

00

07

63

2673

00

00

20

2671

00

05

08

2670

00

11

55

2667

00

02

36

2669

00

00

20

2665

00

01

01

2666

00

04

93

2152

00

06

62

2170

00

14

49

2153

00

32

49

2159

00

11

72

490

00

00

20

489

00

04

21

492

00

00

20

487

00

01

97

488

00

03

54

486

00

02

42

497

00

03

12

483

00

00

20

498

00

03

26

501

00

01

17

502

00

00

20

482

00

00

20

481

00

03

66

480

00

04

92

470

00

02

86

479

00

00

20

472

00

05

01

473

00

02

80

476

00

00

20

474

00

01

76

471

00

00

20

475

00

15

83

453

00

00

20

602-Road

00

02

51

603-Road

00

00

20

601

00

05

88

604

00

07

61

608

00

01

01

609

00

00

20

605

00

00

66

606

00

01

66

607

00

03

55

612

00

05

93

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4086

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

HARPUR TENGRAHI

611

00

02

97

Thana Number:387—Contd.

610

00

02

56

628

00

02

01

626

00

07

75

627

00

00

20

636

00

06

82

637

00

04

16

638

00

03

01

647

00

05

92

648

00

00

20

649

00

00

20

646

00

01

40

645

00

03

32

644

00

03

16

643

00

03

29

654

00

03

69

653

00

00

20

658

00

01

82

659

00

02

08

660

00

03

77

663

00

02

65

664

00

00

72

1754

00

03

33

1753

00

01

67

1743

00

04

77

1745

00

01

41

1741

00

01

01

2877-Road

00

01

36

799-Road

00

02

53

2879-Road

00

02

18

1523

00

12

34

1526

00

00

20

1527

00

05

63

1522

00

05

89

1529

00

06

06

1530

00

03

71

1532

00

14

53

1533

00

02

61

1504

00

01

06

1501

00

09

96

1500

00

04

36

1499

00

01

21

1555

00

00

20

1498

00

07

09

1497

00

11

22

TENDASPUR

601

00

09

61

Thana Number:464

599

00

03

04

598

00

01

38

597

00

04

99

551

00

04

92

454

00

00

20

552

00

05

09

593

00

00

20

553

00

02

16

554

00

03

68

555

00

00

65

587

00

03

85

586

00

00

69

574

00

04

34

575

00

08

82

585

00

00

20

582

00

05

06

576

00

01

19

573

00

00

20

577

00

05

24

578

00

00

28

500-Cart Track

00

01

37

424-Gandak River

00

20

60

432-Gandak River

00

03

79

433-Gandak River

00

04

19

431-Gandak River

00

00

20

434-Gandak River

00

00

72

436-Gandak River

00

05

88

437-Gandak River

00

02

32

438-Gandak River

00

00

22

439-Gandak River

00

00

20

441-Gandak River

00

00

20

442-Gandak River

00

00

20

466-Gandak River

00

09

33

[F. No. R-25011/19/2013-OR-I]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4087

4088

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Je ,oa jkstxkj ea=kky;

ubZ fnYyh] 2 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1541-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ jkmjdsyk

LVhy IykaV] lqUnjx<+ ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds

deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh;

ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] Hkqous'oj ds iapkV

(lanHkZ la[;k 76@2012) çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks

2&7&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹iQk- la- ,y&29011@21@2012&vkbZ vkj (,e)º

tksgu rksiuks] voj lfpo

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

New Delhi, the 2nd July, 2013

S.O. 1541.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the common award (Ref.

No. 76/2012) of the Central Government Industrial

Tribunal/Labour Court, Bhubaneswar now as shown in

the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the

employers in relation to the management of Rourkela

Steel Plant, Sundargarh, and their workman, which was

received by the Central Government on 2-7-2013.

[ F. No. L- 29011/21/2012-IR(M)]

JOHAN TOPNO, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-

CUM-LABOUR COURT, BHUBANESWAR

Present :Shri J. Srivastava, Presiding Officer, C.G..I.T.-

Cum-Labour, Court, Bhubaneswar

I.D. Case No. 76/2012

Date of Passing Order-13th June, 2013

Between :

The Chief Executive Officer, SAIL,

Rourkela Steel Plant, At./PO. Rourkela,

Dist. Sundargarh, (Orissa)-769 003.

...Ist Party Management

(And)

The General Secretary,

Rourkela Shramik Sangh,

Shramik Mandir, Qrs. No. D-81,

Sector-18, Rourkela-769 003.

. . .2nd Party-Union

Appearances :

None. ... For the 1st Party-Management

None. ... For the 2nd Party-Union

ORDER

Case taken up today. Both the parties are absent.

The case is today fixed for filing of statement of claim by

the 2nd Party-Union, but neither any person on behalf of

the 2nd Party-Union turned up in the court nor filed any

statement of claim, though the 2nd Party-Union was

required to file the statement of claim within fifteen days

from the date of receipt of the order of reference. This

reference was received in this Tribunal on 16-8-2012. After

waiting for expiry of the stipulated period, when no

statement of claim was filed by the 2nd Party-Union, order

for issuing notice to the 2nd Party-Union was passed on

29-10-2012 and notice was issued accordingly. But no

statement of claim was filed by the date fixed. Thereafter

on 26-12-2012 an application from the General Secretary of

the 2nd Party-Union was received through post for grant

of six weeks time to file the statement of claim. But even

after lapse of more than six week’s time, the 2nd Party-

Union did not file any statement of claim or even took

pains to come to the court to see what happended to its

application and what order were passed in the case.

However more time than prayed for was given to the 2nd

Party-Union to file its statement of claim. Now nearly

ten months time is going to expire from the date of receipt

of this reference. Hence no further time can be given to

the 2nd Party-Union to come and prosecute its case. It

will be a wanton effort for this Tribunal to keep the case

pending any more. There might be that the parties have

entered into a settlement out of the court to resolve their

dispute between themselves. Therefore it would be

expedient to close the case and pass a no-dispute award.

2. Accordingly a no-dispute award is passed and the

reference is answered on the above terms.

J. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 2 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1542-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ esVykbiQ

bafM;k ba';ksjsa'k fyfeVsM ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds

deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/ eas fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh;

ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] ua- 1] eqEcbZ ds iapkV

(lanHkZ la[;k 13@2012) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj

dks 2&7&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹iQk- la- ,y&17012@37@2011&vkbZ vkj (,e)º

tksgu rksiuks] voj lfpo

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4089

New Delhi, the 2nd July, 2013

S.O. 1542.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 13/

2012) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/

Labour Court, No. 1, Mumbai now as shown in the

Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers

in relation to the management of M/s. Metlife India

Insurance Co. Ltd., and their workman, which was received

by the Central Government on 02-07-2013.

[ F. No. L- 17012/37/2011-IR(M)]

JOHAN TOPNO, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-NO. 1

MUMBAI

Present :

JUSTICE G. S. SARRAF, Presiding Officer

Reference No. CGIT-1/13 OF 2012

Parties : Employers in relation to the management of

M/s. Metlife India Insurance Company Ltd.

And

Their workman (Shri Madhusudan Ayodhya Prasad

Tiwari)

Appearances :

For the first Party

:

Absent

For the workman

:

Absent

State

:

Maharashtra

Mumbai, dated the 3rd day of May, 2013

AWARD

1. This is reference made by the Central Government in

exercise of its powers under clause (d) of sub-section

(1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947. The terms of reference given in the

schedule are as follows :

“Whether the action of the management of

M/s. Metlife Insurance Company Limited,

Mumbai, in terminating the services of

Shri Madhusudan Ayodhya Prasad Tiwari, Sales

Manager w.e.f. 4-5-2 0 11 is legal a n d

justified? What relief the worman is entitled to?”

2. After service of notice the workman was

present on 4-5-2012 and thereafter on 20-6-2012,

6-8-2012, 28-9-2012, 1-11-2012 6-12-2012, 7-2-2013

and on each date he sought time to file statement of claim.

the workman failed to turn up on 4-4-2013 on which date

he was given last chance to file statement of claim. He

has not attended the Court today and he has not filed any

statement of claim.

3. The first party has also not appeared inspite

of service of notice.

4. In the absence of any pleading or proof the

action of the first party cannot be held to be illegal or

unjustified.

5. The workman is not entitled to any relief.

Award is passed accordingly.

JUSTICE G. S. SARRAF, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 2 tqykbZ] 2013

dk- vk- 1543-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947

(1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ

bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM] ikuhir fjiQkbujh çkstsDV ds

çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/ esa

fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|kSfxd vf/dj.k@Je

U;k;ky;] paMhx<+ ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 44@2004) dks çdkf'kr

djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 2&7&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹iQk- la- ,y&30012@24@2004&vkbZ vkj (,e)º

tksgu rksiuks] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 2nd July, 2013

S.O. 1543.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the common award (Ref.

No. 44/2004) of the Central Government Industrial

Tribunal/Labour Court, Chandigarh now as shown in the

Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers

in relation to the management of Indian Oil Corporation

Ltd. Panipat Refinery Porject, and their workman, which

was received by the Central Government on 2-7-2013.

[F. No. L- 30012/24/2004-IR(M)]

JOHAN TOPNO, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL

TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT-II,

CHANDIGARH

Present: Sri A.K. Rastogi, Presiding Officer

Case No. I.D.44/2004 Registered on 30-11-2004

Sh. Narender S/o Sh. Om Prakash, Village Munak,

Tehsil Charaunda, Haryana, Karnal ...Petitioner

Versus

The Executive Director, Indian Oil Corporation Limited,

Panipat Refinery Project, Baholi, Panipat. ...Respondent

APPEARANCES :

For the Workman

Sh. Raj Kaushik, Adv.

For the Management

Sh. S. Kaushal, Adv.

4090

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

AWARD

Passed on 15-5-2013

Central Government vide Notification No. L-30012/

24/2004 -IR(M)) Dated 2/11/2004, by exercising its powers

under Section 10 sub-section (1) Clause (d) and Sub

section (2A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

(hereinafter referred to as ‘Act’) has referred the

following Industrial dispute for adjudication to this

Tribunal:—

“Whether the action of the management of Indian

Oil Corporation Limited Panipat Refinery, in terminating

the services of Sh. Narinder S/o Sh. Om Prakash, Helper

Gr.-I w. e.f. 11-6-2001 is just and legal? If not to what

relief the. workman is entitled to?”

.

.

As per claim statement workman had been

appointed. as Helper Grade-I in Power and Utility

Department and he had worked under control and

supervision in Oil Refinery Bohli (Pantipat) from 1-12-

1999 to11-6-2001. Respondent refused work to him on

11-6-2001 without assigning any reason and notice and

thus terminated his service illegally and wrongfully. The

workman has completed more than 240 days service and

the respondent has violated Section 25F of the Act. The

workman has alleged the violation of Section 25N; O, G

and H also of the Act. He has prayed for his reinstatement

with continuity in service and back wages.

Claim was contested by the respondent. It was

denied that workman was the employee of the respondent

or he had worked under the supervision and control of

the respondent. According to the respondent the workman

had been engaged by Contractor who had been assigning

for supervising his work. Contractor had deputed the

workman to work and the workman worked under the

control and supervision of the contractor. Contractor was

his pay master and there is no question of terminating

the service of the workman by the respondent.

A replication was filed by the workman to

reiterate his case.

In support of his case the workman examined

himself and relied on copies of attendance-sheet marked

(A & B). On behalf of management B.S. Sallan SHRM of

the respondent was examined. After his statement the

workman did not appear since 3-12-2007 A notice sent

by registered post on 30-6-2010 returned with the postal

endorsment hat he is not available on the given address'

hence the case was ordered to proceed ex-parte against

him on 3-9-2010.

I have heard the learned counsel for the management.

The learned counsel for the management argued that the

workman has pleaded to be an employee of the respondent

but there is nothing to prove the relationship of employer

and employee between the respondent and the workman.

The alleged attendance sheet marked ‘A & B’ filed by the

workman proves nothing. There is nothing to show that

they are the copies of the record maintained by the

respondent. From the statement of the workman it is clear

that he has no appointment letter, he was not registered

with the employment exchange, he had not seen any

advertisement of the post and he had not applied for the

job, he has not been issued any interview letter and neither

was he issued any termination order. It also clear from his

statement that no deduction of Provident Fund had been

made by the management and there is no proof that he

had been paid wages by the management. Thus there is

nothing to show that the workman was in the employment

of the bank and from the evidence of management witness

it is clear that the workman had been working with the

Contractor M/s. Prakash Construction of the respondent.

I agree that there is nothing, on record to show that

the workman was the employee of the respondent. I need

not to say that as the workman has alleged the relationship

of master and servant between the respondent and himself,

the burden was on him to prove the relationship and as he

has failed in proving the relationship he has no case. I

therefore hold that the workman was not in the employment

of respondent and there was no question or terminating

his services by the respondent. The reference is

accordingly answered against the workman. Hard copy

and soft copy of the award be sent to the Central

Government for further necessary action.

ASHOK KUMAR RASTOGI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 2 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1544-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ Hkatk

feujYl izk- fyfeVsM] dsU>ksj ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj

muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|kSfxd vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] Hkqous'oj ds

iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 37@2004)] dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh;

ljdkj dks 2&7&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹iQk- la- ,y&26012@6@2004&vkbZ vkj (,e)º

tksgu rksiuks] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 2nd July, 2013

S.O. 1544.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the common award (Ref.

No. 37/2004) of the Central Government Industrial

Tribunal/Labour Court, Bhubaneshwar now as shown in

the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the

employers in relation to the management of M/s. Bhanja

Minerals (P) Ltd. Keonjhar, and their workman, which

was received by the Central Government on 2-7-2013.

[F. No. L- 26012/6/2004 IR(M)]

JOHAN TOPNO, Under Secy.

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4091

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-

CUM- LABOUR COURT, BHUBANESWAR

Present:

Shri J. Srivastava, Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-cum-Labour

Court, Bhubaneswar

Industrial Dispute Case No. 37/2004

Date of Passing: Award -17th June. 2013

Between:

The Managing Director,

,

M/s, Bhanja Minerals (P) Ltd.,

At. Park Street, PO. Keonjhar, Dist. Keonjhar, ( Orissa)

...1st Party-Management.

(AND)

Their workman Shri Shri Rangadhar Patra,

S/o. Nirakar Patra, At./PO. Khendra, Via. Jhumpura,

Orissa, Keonjhar

...2nd Party- Workman.

Appearances :

Shri Sribatsa Mohap

:

For the 1st Party-

Auth. Representative

Management

None

:

For the 2nd Party-

Workman.

A WAR D

The Government of India in the Ministry of Labour

vide its letter No. L-26012/6/2004-IR(M) dated 17-5-2004

has referred an industrial dispute existing between the

employers in relation to the management of M/s. Bhanja

Minerals (P) Ltd. and their workmen in exercise of the

powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and

sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes

Act, 1947 in respect of the following matter :

“Whether the action of the management of

M/s. Bhanja Minerals (P) Ltd., Inganijharan Iron &

Mn. Mines At/P.O. Inganijharan, Via Joda, Dist.

Keonjhar in terminating the services of Sh.

Ranghadhar Patra, S/o Nirakar Patra, At/PO.

Jhamopura, Dist. Keonjhar (Orissa) from

17-4-2001 without serving proper notice and also

without complying the provision of Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 is justified? If not, what relief the

workman is entitled to?”

2.The 2nd Party-workman in his statement of claim

has stated that he was engaged as semi-skilled worker by

the 1 st Party-Management on 5.2.1985 and was placed to

work in Inganijharan Iron Mines Area.He had worked under

the 1st Party-Management for more than 16 years

continuously without any break. During his tenure of

service he was never served with any notice or called for

any explanation for negligence or disobedience. He had

discharged his normal duties to the best of satisfaction of

his boss. Suddenly he was refused employment on

17.4.2001 without any reason. He was told by the manager

that there was no work for him and he would be called for

as and when there would be availability of work. But the

work was available and so many workers were working.

Thus the refusal of employment to the 2nd Party-workman

amounts to retrenchment. He was not served with any

notice nor was paid wages for one month in lieu of notice.

So provisions of Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes

Act are attracted in his case. Therefore, his termination is

illegal and he is entitled to be reinstated with full back

wages.

3.The 1st Party-Management has alleged in his reply

that the 2nd party-workman was working under the

contractor who had taken contract for the work from the

Management. So Shri Rangadhar Patra was not an

employee of the Management. It has further been alleged

that the 2nd Party-workman remained absent continuously

from 17-4-2001 without any intimation to the Management's

contractor. He suddenly came after more than six months

and claimed payment of gratuity from the 1st Party-

Management and then filed an application before the Asst.

Labour Commissioner (Central) for the same. The Assistant

Labour Commissioner (Central), Rourkela awarded an

amount of Rs. 6000 as gratuity to the workman who

subsequently challenged the order before the Regional

Labour Commissioner (Central), Bhubaneswar where he

admitted his retirement from service on 17-4-2001. After

hearing both the parties the Regional Labour Commissioner

(Central), Bhubaneswar being the appellate authority

passed order for payment of gratuity amounting to Rs.

14,220 along with 10% simple interest from 18-4-2001 to

the workman. The Management being the principal

employer had paid an amount of Rs. 22,705 on 23-2-2007

through bank draft which was received by the workman.

In view of the above the claim of the workman is illegal

and liable to be dismissed. The workman has not made the

sub-contractor as party to the case.

4. On the pleadings of the parties following issues

were framed :

ISSUES

1.

Whether the action of the Management of

M/s. Bhanja Minerals (P) Ltd., Inganijharan

Iron & Mn. Mines, At/PO. Inganijharan, Via.

Joda, Dist Keonjhar in terminating the services

of Shri Rangadhar Patra, S/o. Nirakar Patra,

At/PO. Jhamopura, Dist Keonjhar (Orissa)

from 17.4.2001 without serving proper notice

and also without complying the provisions of

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is justified?

2.

Whether the 2nd Party-workman has worked

for more than 240 days from the last preceding

year of termination of his service?

4092

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

3.

Whether the 2nd Party-workman is entitled

to the benefits of Section 25-F of the Industrial

Disputes Act?

4.

If not, what relief is the workman entitled

to?

5. The 2nd Party-workman except on 6.7.2005

never appeared before this Tribunal Labour Court. He

even sent his statement of claim through post on 8.5.2006.

He was given every chance to appear and contest the case,

but he never appeared as except on one date as stated

above. Therefore, the case was ultimately set exparte

against him on 16.1.2012.

6. The 1st Party-Management contested the case

and filed sworn affidavit of Shri Sribatsa Kumar Mohapatra

in evidence along with photostat copies of two documents.

FINDINGS

ISSUE NO. 1

7. Since the burden to prove this issue lies on the

2nd Party- workman and he has not discharged his burden,

it cannot be believed against the pleadings of the 1st Party-

Management that he was an employee of the 1st party-

Management and he was terminated from service with effect

from 17.4.2001 without taking re-course to the relevant

provisions of law made under the Industrial Disputes Act,

1947. The 1st Party-Management has categorically stated

in its pleadings that the 2nd Party-workman had admitted

his retirement from service on 17.4.2001 before the Regional

Labour Commissioner (Central), Bhubaneswar as is

reflected in the order passed by him on 23.1.2007 copy of

which has been annexed as Annexure-l to the affidavit of

Shri Sribatsa Kumar Mohapatra. Therefore, it is very much

doubtful that he was terminated from service by the 1st

Party-Management on 17.4.2001. Had the 2nd Party-

workman retired on 17.4.2001 he cannot be said to have

been terminated by the 1st Party- Management and in that

case retrenchment com~pensation under Section 25- F of

the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is not required to be

paid, Therefore the alleged action of the Management

regarding termination of the 2nd Party-workman from

service cannot be made a matter of dispute. This issue

thus decided against the 2nd Party-workman.

ISSUE NOS. 2 & 3

8. Since both the issues are co-related they are

taken up together for convenience sake.

9. The burden to prove these issues also lies on the

2nd Party-workman. But he has failed to adduce any

documentary or oral evidence in support of his claim of

having worked with the 1 st Party- Management for more

than 16 years or at least 240 days from the last preceding

year of alleged termination of his service. The 2nd Party-

workman has not dared to come to the witness box to

prove his allegations. On the other hand, the 1st Party-

Management has stated that the 2nd party-workman was

a contract worker, and not a direct employee of the 1st

Party-Management and this fact has been reiterated in the

affidavit evidence of Shri Sribatsa Kumar Mohapatra,

without admitting that he had worked under the 1st Party-

Management since 5.2.1985. In any case these issues

become insignificant or immaterial as the 2nd Party-

workman has stated to have retired from service and in

that case he is not entitled to the protection of the

provisions of Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act,

1947. These issues are decided accordingly against the

2nd Party-workman.

ISSUE NO. 4

10. In view of the findings recorded above under

Issues Nos. 1 to 3 the 2nd Party-workman is not entitled

to any relief and his claim is liable to be dismissed.

11. The reference is answered accordingly.

J. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 2 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1545-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ

vks,uthlh fyfeVsM] f'kolkxj] vle ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa

vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] xksgkVh ds

iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 3@2008) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh;

ljdkj dks 2&7&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹iQk- la- ,y&30015@8@2007&vkbZ vkj (,e)º

tksgu rksiuks] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 2nd July, 2013

S.O. 1545.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the common Award (Ref.

No. 3/2008) of the Central Government Industrial

Tribunal/Labour Court, Guwahati now as shown in the

Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers

in relation to the management of ONGC Ltd., Sibsagar,

Assam, and their workman, which was received by the

Central Government on 2-7-2013.

[ F. No.-L30015/8/2007-IR (M)]

JOHAN TOPNO, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR

COURT, GUWAHATI, ASSAM

Present :

SHRI L. C. DEY. MA., LL.B.,

Presiding Officer,

C.G..I.T.-Cum-Labour Court, Guwahati

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4093

In the matter of an Industrial Dispute between :

The Management of O.N.G.C., Sibsagar, Assam.

Vrs.

Their Workmen represented by the Secretary,

ONGC Field Party Contingent Workers’

Association, Jorhat, Assam

Ref. Case No. 03 of 2008.

APPEARANCES

For the Management :

Mr. P. K. Roy, Advocate.

Mr. S. K. Chakrabarty, Advocate.

Mrs. A. Chakrabarty, Advocate.

For the Union :

Mr. A. Dasgupta, Advocate.

Mr. S. Das, Advocate,

Miss M. Das, Advocate.

Date of Award : 31-5-2013

AWARD

1.

This Reference Case is initiated upon raising an

Industrial Dispute between the ONGC Field Party Workers’

Association, Jorhat and the management of ONGC Ltd.,

Sibsagar, which was referred by the Ministry of Labour &

Employment, Government of India, vide their Order No.

L-30015/8/2007-IR(M); Dated: 03-03-2008 u/s 10(1)(d)

of the I.D. Act, 1947. The Schedule of the Reference is

as under:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the demands of ONGC Field Party

Contingent Workers Association, namely, (i) for

restraining the management of ONGC from

introducing contract labour for contingent work and

to allow contingent work to be performed by the

members of their Union (ii) Quashing the tender

notice No. ER/MM/GSD/39/97-98 issued by the

Dy. GM (MM), Exploration Business Group,

ONGC, Sibsagar, Assam and (iii) to enforce the

certified Standing Orders relating to regularization

of 223 contingent workers, are just and legal? If so,

what directions need to be issued and to what relief

the 223 workmen are entitled to?”

2.

After registration of this Reference case, the

notices were served and both the parties namely, ONGC

Field Party Contingent Workers Association (hereinafter

called Workers’ Associations) and the Management of

ONGC Ltd., Sibsagar, Assam appeared and contested the

proceeding by filing Claim Statement/Written Statement.

The Workers Association raised a dispute before the

Regional Labour Commissioner (C) in the year 1996 claiming

regularization of a little more than about 100 workers

who completed the requisite period of service for

regularization. While the ONGC Ltd. (hereinafter called

the Management) resisted the claim of the workers before

the Assistant Labour Commissioner (C), Dibrugarh and on

failure to settle the dispute in the conciliation FOC report

was submitted by the Conciliation Officer to the

Government of India on 27-10-97. During the pendency

of the conciliation proceeding the management issued

formal Advertisement on 11.11.97 regarding engagement

of contract labourer through some individual contractors

in place of existing contingent workers. While the workers

association filed a Writ Petition being Civil Rule No.

5744/97 in the Gauhati High Court on 11-12-97 with

prayer for restraining the management from introducing

contract labourer in place of the contingent workers by

abolishing existing system, and the contingent works

performed by the members of the workers Association

shall be allowed to be continued as before and to quash

the tender notice issued by the management on 11-11-97;

and also for regularization of the members of the workers

Association under Standing Order of the ONGC.

Accordingly the Hon’ble Single Judge of the Gauhati High

Court disposed of the Civil Rule No.5744/97 on 15-9-98

directing that the Secretary to the Government of India,

Ministry of Labour and Employment, New Delhi or the

competent authority of the Central Government will pass

order under sub- section (5) of Section 12 of the Industrial

Dispute Act,1947 on the FOC Report dated 27-10-97.

In the mean time on 28-10-98 the Central Government

passed an order u/s 12(5) of the I.D. Act,1947 with their

views that there was no reason for referring a case to the

Industrial Tribunal for adjudication due to the reason as

under :

“The concerned workers are contingent/casual

workers, hence, their claim to regularize their service

is not valid.”

Subsequently the workers Association preferred

Writ Appeal being No. 352/98 which was dismissed with

observation that since an order has now been passed declining

the Reference, the only course open to the Applicant is to

approach this Court in Writ Proceeding, and allowed the

interim direction issued by the learned Single Judge at the

time of disposal of the Writ Petition to continue to operate

for a period of another 2 week from the date of passing of

the order. Thereafter, the workers Association preferred

another Writ Petition being No. Civil Rule No. 6771/98

before the Hon’ble Gauhati High Court & the Hon’ble High

Court disposed of the said Writ Petition with direction to

the Central Government to refer the claim of the members

of the petitioners/Association to regularize/ conversion of

their status as regular employees of the ONGC in accordance

with the Standing Order in force.

On being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the order

passed by the Hon’ble High Court in Civil Rule No. 6771/

98 the management of ONGC preferred an Appeal before

the Division Bench of the Hon’ble Gauhati High Court

vide Writ Appeal No.371/2005 against the judgment passed

4094

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

by the learned Single Judge which was also disposed of

holding that there was no infirmity in the order passed by

the learned Single Judge. Thereafter, the Management of

ONGC preferred a Special Leave Petition before the Hon’ble

Supreme Court against the judgment passed by the Gauhati

High Court in Writ Appeal No. 371/05 and the Hon’ble

Supreme Court while issuing the SLP was pleased to stay

operation of the impugned judgment and order dated 14-

11-06. In the mean time the Central Government in terms of

the judgment and order dated 15-9-98 passed in Civil Rule

No. 5744/97 made an order of this Reference vide order

dated 3-3-2008. Thereafter the management of ONGC filed

petition before the Apex Court stating that since the order

so passed by the Government was an attempt to over reach

jurisdiction of the Hon’ble Apex Court and in particular,

the interim order dated 2-3-2007 passed by the Hon’ble

Apex Court, prayed for staying operation of the order dated

14-11-06 passed by Hon’ble Gauhati High Court. The

Hon’ble Supreme Court passed an order of the stay of the

proceeding pending before this Tribunal and ultimately

the SLP (Civil) No. 3278/07 was disposed of on 10-11-08

modifying and restricting the terms of Reference and

directing this Tribunal to consider the cases of the workers

who claimed to have completed 240 days of work within a

period of 12 consecutive months in a year and also fulfilled

the conditions of regularization.

The case of the workers Association, inter-alia is

that the ONGC explore Oil and different kinds of Natural

Gases from different parts of the Country, and for that

purpose they collect some data called as seismic data under

the surface of the earth in order to assess the quantity of

natural gas and oil where available. This job is being

performed by the employees called Geo-Physical Field

Party. The members of the present workers Association are

called as Contingent Workers who require to assist the

Field Party in exploration of their mobile exploration work

which include laying of cables, Geo-phones and shot firing

for exploration in order to collect seismic data. Some of

them are engaged as Drivers, Clerks, General Store Keeper,

Peon etc. This operation of collection of seismic data, is

being carried throughout the year except rainy days and

during the rainy days, the contingent workers are engaged

in repairing and other relevant works including clerical and

other allied works. It is mentioned that there are about 223

(mentioned in Annexure-B of the claim statement) contingent

workers who are members of the present Association have

been working continuously since 1994 under the Deputy

General Manager (MM), ONGC, without any break till 1997.

The Association further stated that the ONGC have a

separate Standing Order to regulate the job of the

contingent workers and casual workers which is called the

Certified Standing Order for contingent employees of the

ONGC. The Clause 2(1) of the Standing Order stipulates

that the contingent workers are of two categories, namely

(a) Temporary (b) Casual. Clause-2(ii) contemplates that a

worker who has been on the roll of the Corporation and

has not less than 180 days of attendance in any period of

12 consecutive months shall be temporary workman, and

the workman who has put in not less than 240 days in any

period of 12 consecutive month and have possessed

minimum qualification prescribed by the Corporation may

be considered for conversion as regular employee while

Clause-2(iii) of the said Standing Order provides that the

workman who is neither temporary nor regular shall be

considered as casual workman; and that the member of the

present workers Association working under the Corporation

for a long spell of time have fulfilled the criteria laid down

in the Standing Order for their regularization. The eligible

workers have also approached the authority concerned for

their regularization but their grievances remained

unredressed. Despite having large number of vacant posts

which are being filled up from the open market the

contingent workers have not been regularized. Thereafter

the workers Association preferred intervention of the

Regional Labour Commissioner raising Industrial Dispute

for regularization of the members of the Association. While

the R.L.C(C) entrusted the Assistant Labour Commissioner

(C), who initiated the conciliation proceeding but it failed

and ultimately FOC was submitted.

The workers Association also alleged that during

the pendency of the process of regularization of contingent

workers the ONGC resorted to an unfair labour practice by

abolishing the contingent jobs performed through their

existing employees and proposed to get it done through a

Contractor. Such an act of the ONGC introducing contract

labour system is noting but to deprive the contingent

workers from their legitimate claim of regularization.

Subsequently, the ONGC in order to abolish contingent

system of employment informed the workmen not to attend

their duties from the month of July,1997 onwards. Upon

which the workers of the Association resorted to protest,

strike and representation before different authorities but

their dispute remain unsettled. In the mean time the Dy.

General Manager (MM), ONGC published an advertisement

in the Local English Daily namely, Eastern Clarion on 11-

11-97 calling for bid from the intending bidders to supply

contract labourer to do the job performed by the members

of the petitioner/Association and thereby the management

of ONGC was found determine to abolish the system of

contingent workers. The workers Association further

submitted that they had accepted the temporary job with

expectation to be regularized in terms of the Standing Order

and the deviation from the provision of the said Standing

Order by the ONGC Ltd. is violative of the Principle laid

down in Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and

it is against the public policy.

The workers Association further stated that the job

performed by the contingent workers were perennial in

nature and they used to work continuously throughout

the year while the management made some artificial break

with a view to deprive the workers from regularisition of

their services in terms of Standing Order; and in spite of

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4095

artificial break a large number of them have completed 240

days of continuous work within 12 consecutive month and

they are eligible to be regularized. It is contended by the

Association that the engagement of contract labourers

against such perennial jobs removing the existing workers

against the principle laid down in the Contract Labour

( Regulation and Abolition) Act,1970 and such illegal Act

of the management to engage contract labour is liable to

be rejected and the tender notice issued by the ONGC for

engagement of contract labour is also liable to be quashed;

and as the workers listed in Annexure-A after fulfilling the

conditions of Certified Standing Order they are entitled to

regularistation of their services. Hence, the workers

Association prayed for quashing the introduction of

Contract Labour system in place of contingent workers

and to direct the management for regularisation the service

of 223 number of contingent workers as mentioned in the

Annexure-A with effect from July,1997 with all consequential

benefit till the date of their resumption on duty.

3.

The Management of Oil and Natural Gas

Corporation Ltd. submitted their written Statement stating

inter-alia that the ONGC is a government owned Company

engaged in the business of exploration of Crude Oil and

Natural Gas in various parts of the Country and the ONGC

is duty bound to comply with the Constitutional

requirement under Article 16 of the Constitution of India

before offering job/service to any person and disengage

persons through contractors for performance of unskilled

nature of jobs like carrying and laying of cables and other

materials. With the liberalization and globalization of

economy, there is shift in Government Policies in respect

of exploration and production of oil and natural gas in

India and after announcement of New Exploration License

Policy by the Government of India. The ONGC along with

other Private Companies Indian and Foreign are

participating in Auction which is an open bidding process.

Thus the ONGC have to compete in the open market with

private and/or multinational companies to bid and win

petroleum exploration license like any other bidder. Under

the above circumstances the ONGC management can not

make any recruitment and/or regularization in anticipation

of success in any such future bidding process. After raising

of the dispute by the Workers Association, due to

development took place in the field of business of the

ONGC, which is directly bearing in the development claimed

by the Associations, management is not in a position to

deploy the members of the workers Association as claimed

by them, nor it has any sanctioned regular vacancies after

1999.

The management denied that all the workers given

in list in Annexure-A are the members of the Associations

and that all its members are contingent workers employed

by the ONGC as alleged. It is also denied by the

management that during off season, rainy days the

contingent workers are engaged for repairing and other

allied works including clerical and other works as alleged.

It is stated by the ONGC that the seismic survey is

conducted in selected fields which normally starts towards

the end of November and ends before the end of May next

year as the rain is the hindrance for seismic survey. It is

also added that the contingent workers are engaged

generally for laying cable, geophones and shifting materials

from one place to another but denied that such contingent

workers are engaged as Clerks, General Store Keeper or

Peon or clerical or any other allied jobs and there services

have never been required by the ONGC at any period

beyond the field season. As such, none of the said

contingent workers has ever completed 240 days in a year

and the contingent workers can never be engaged

permanently and or on regular basis because in the very

next field season seismic survey may be conducted in some

other fields and it may not be in the same locality, even may

be in different State or far away from the field where such

survey was undertaken last. It is also not possible for the

ONGC to carry these contingent labourers from one State/

place to another. It is further averred that while engaging

the contingent labourer their educational qualification or

other eligibility is required for making any recruitment in

the ONGC under their Recruitment Rule, has never been

considered and the seismic survey is being conducted in

primitive manner.

The ONGC mentioned that the workers Association

had challenged the process of engaging Contractors by

floating tender by filing Writ Petition in C.R. No. 5744

of 1997 but was unable to get any relief from the Hon’ble

High Court. It is also denied that these workers have been

working in the aforesaid job without any break till 1997 and

that the attendance register for that behalf were maintained

by the Party Chief in respect of Geophysical party. The

ONGC again stated that the Certified Standing Order for

contingent workers of the ONGC is always read with other

relevant guideline and subject to the constitutional

limitations and the Constitution being the Suprema Lex,

shall prevail over all other statutes.

The management again pleaded that they had a policy

of regularization during 1967 onwards when a guideline

was given to consider cases of absorption of contingent

workers where such are considered for engagement against

regular posts, if available, and no extra post was created

for their absorption; and that mere completing 240 days in

12 consecutive months was only one of the criteria, under

the guidelines issued vide Circular No. 27(70)/87-IR dated

16.07.1991. Other criteria required to fulfill for regularization

are laid down under Clause 4.2 of the above mentioned

executive instruction of ONGC in this regard are:

(i) They have completed 240 working days service in the

commission (now Corporation) in the 12 consecutive

months;

4096

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(ii) They are registered with the employment exchange;

(iii) They are held against regular post;

(iv) They posses the requisite qualification and experience

etc. laid down in the ONGC (R & P) regulation;

(v) No extra post will be created for absorption of

contingent workers and no relaxation in the

qualification will be accorded;

(vi) Relaxation in age-limit upto 35 years for technical cadres

and 30 years for non-technical cadres may be

accorded.

The management again denied the allegation that

they are indulging in unfair labour practice abolishing the

contingent jobs performed through the existing employees

and proposed to get it done through a contractor resulting

in deprivation of large number of contingent workers from

their claim of regularization. The management further denied

the averments made in paras-ll, 12,13,14,16,17,18 and 19 of

the claim statement filed by the Association. It is added by

the management that the Hon’ble Guwahati High Court

vide their judgment and order dated 12.3.98 in W.A.

No.352 of 1998 dismissed the Appeal filed by the workers

Association up-holding the Guwahati High Court’s order

passed in Civil Rule No.5744 of 1997, refusing to grant

the interim relief sought for by the workers Association.

It is further denied by the management that the Hon’ble

High Court did not issue any specific direction for

engagement of the contingent workers as alleged. Even

otherwise, none of them can be regularized in view of the

law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Secretary,

State of Karnataka-vs-Uma Devi and Ors. Reported in

(2006) 4 SCC 1. The management also said that the

members of the workers Association who raised the

dispute has no nexus and/or relationship even remotely,

with the floating of the tenders.

The management denying the statements made in

the Para-26 of the claim statements, stated that the workers

Association while raising the dispute vide their letter dated

21.6.96 had claimed that there were little more than 100

workers who have completed requisite period of service,

required for their regularization, but now the Association

has annexed a list of 223 persons claiming their

regularization and hence, the claim of the Association is

un-genuine apart from being legal and not maintainable in

law. The management of ONGC categorically denied that

the concerned documents in connection with the service

of the workers concerned, as alleged, are laying with the

custody of the management and as such, the claim for

calling the attendance register and the wage register for

security and verification of the claim of the Association is

wholly uncalled for, and it is the burden of the workers

Association to prove their own case and they can not shift

the burden in this manner. However, the plea of the workmen

that the documents like Identity Card, Certificate issued by

the Party Chief, etc. were lost by them is an attempt to make

out the case in favour of the Association. Further the

documents annexed by the Workers Association are

marked as Annexure-N (Exhibit-N) does not show in any

manner that any of the person named therein has

completed 240 days of work within a period of 12

consecutive months in a year, and the gate passes always

have a special validity dates and are issued for a different

purpose such as collection of arrears, bonus etc. and the

said documents can not form the basis of the claim for

regularization of service. It is also mentioned that the said

documents has annexed ( Exhibit-N) are on the face of it,

tempered with, overwritten and as such, fabricated.

The management also denied the averment made in

paragraphs-30,31 and 32. It is contended by the

management that the claim of the person beyond the

Annexure-N are only speculative and no legs to stand as

the person named in Annexure-N did not ever work as

contingent workers in the ONGC, their names have now

been added to make a false claim for regularization. Under

the above circumstances the management prayed for

answering the order of Reference as modified by the

Hon’ble Supreme Court in negative against the workers

Association.

4.

In order to assail the plea of the management

made in the written statement the Association submitted

Additional written statement and mentioned that the

statements made in the written statement by the

management are not supported by the materials on record.

In the written statement the Association beside the list of

the members of the Union, another list of workers/members

of the Union enclosed as Annexure-M who have sufficient

documents to prove that they have completed more than

240 days of work in a particular year such as, Sri Pinku

Dutta, Pabitra Das and Rajani Gogoi who have completed

240 days but their names were not appeared in Annexure-

M and although the workers were engaged as contingent

workers but most of them have completed 240 days service

in a particular year. The management, despite specific order

passed by the Hon’ble High Court in Civil Rule No.5744/

1997 deliberately engaged contract labour in place of

contingent workers with a view to deprive the members of

the Association. It is averred that the statement made in

paragraphs-16 & 17 of the W.S. filed by the management

are misleading, baseless and concocted as the workers

mentioned in Annexure- A are contingent workers directly

employed by the ONGC and the members of the workers

Association and most of the workers were recruited

through local employment exchange or through interview

of the Head Office considering their qualification and

experience. The Association pleaded that Pay register will

prove the facts regarding continuous engagement of the

concerned workers and the management also paid bonus

to almost all the workers besides other facilities including

medical facilities; and the workers have been working

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4097

continuously for a long period as such, it become essential

to introduce the Certified Standing Order to regularize

the service of the workers. It is added that the jobs

performed by the contingent workers are not unskilled in

nature rather most of the jobs are skilled jobs for which

license is required to be obtained from the appropriate

authority and they have to perform some works under the

roof during rainy season. The Association denied the

contents of paragraphs-22,23,24,27,29,30,31,32,33 to 35

of the Written Statement of the management and

mentioned that the management has been violating the

provision of the Certified Standing Order in all respect in

order to deprive the workers from their legitimate right/

benefit since the workers were working? against vacant

post of contingent workers.

5.

The Workers Association examined one witness

while the management examined two witnesses. Both the

parties have proved some documents in support of their

testimony. I have heard argument from both the sides at

length. Let me discuss the evidence adduced by both the

sides.

Workmen witness No.1, Sri Jitumoni Borah, The

Secretary, ONGC Field Party Contingent Workers

Association, Jorhat stated that the workers listed in

Annexure-A were engaged regularly for a long period

continuously and they were termed as Contingent workers

whose Attendance Registers were maintained by the party

Chief of the respective Geophysical parties. The ONGC

has a separate Standing Order to regulate the jobs of

contingent workers and casual workers, which was framed

under the provisions of Industrial Employment (Standing

Orders) Act,1946, called as “Certified Standing Orders

for contingent Employees of ONGC” (marked as Exhibit-

B). The Clause-2(i) of the Standing Order stipulates that

the contingent employees are of two categories, namely,

Temporary & Casual. Clause-2(ii) contemplates that a

workman who has been on the roll of the Corporation and

has not less than 180 days of attendance in any period of

12 consecutive month shall be temporary workman, and

240 days in any period of 12 consecutive months and who

possess the minimum qualification prescribed by the

Corporation may be considered as regular employee.

Clause-3(iii) of the said Standing Order provided that the

workman who is neither temporary nor regular, shall be

considered as casual workman. He mentioned that almost

all the workers indicated in Annexure-A (Exhibit-N) have

fulfilled the criteria laid down in the Standing Order for

regularization and they have approached the concerned

authority for regularization of the service of the concerned

eligible workers but the management did not take any

initiative towards any regularization, while the Association

adopted some agitational programmers to impress upon

the management to make an amicable settlement but the

management instead of regularizing the services of

contingent workers recruited some new persons from the

open market while the Association raised Industrial Dispute

before the Regional Labour Commissioner (C) and the

Assistant Labour Commissioner (C), Dibrugarh initiated

conciliation for settlement of the issue but it failed and this

Reference was initiated. W.W.1 mentioned that during the

course of conciliation the management adopted some unfair

labour practices with a view to abolish contingent system

of employments and to introduce contract labour system

issued formal advertisement on 11.11.97 regarding

engagement of contract labour through some contractors

vide Exhibit-E. Such a practice of engagement of contract

labourer by abolishing direct system of employment is

against the public policy as the members of the workers

Association accepted the temporary job with an expectation

that their services would be regularized in terms of the

Standing Order. Then the Association preferred a Writ

Application of Civil Rule No.5744/97 before the Hon’ble

High Court with prayer for restraining the management

from introducing contract labour for the contingent works

abolishing the existing system declaring the tender notice

issued by the management as illegal and liable to be

quashed and the members of the Association shall be

allowed to continue as before. An interim order in this regard

was also prayed for to the effect that further proceeding of

the operation of the said tender notice may be stayed but

the Hon’ble Single Judge admitted the petition declining

to pass any interim stay order. Subsequently on 23.12.97

the management issued a corrigendum to the earlier tender

notice published in Asian Age on 23.12.97 revising the

date of submission of tender to 16.12.97 and opening the

date of tender to 29.12.97 vide Exhibit-G. The aforesaid Civil

Rule No. 5744/97 was disposed of on 15.9.98 by the Hon’ble

High Court directing the Secretary to the Government of

India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi or the competent

authority of the Central Government to pass an order u/s 5

of Section 12 of Industrial Dispute Act on F.O.C. report

submitted by the Assistant Labour Commissioner (C),

Dibrugarh within a period of 2 months from the date of

receipt of the certified copy of judgment along with copy

of the Writ Petition from the workman Association; and

also with direction that until further orders passed by the

Central Government and until the dispute if referred is

adjudicated under the Industrial Dispute Act,1947 the

ONGC will as and when required and as far as practicable,

employ the said workmen named in Annexure-A to the Writ

Petition directly in accordance with the Rules and the law

which are applicable vide Exhibit-H. But the management

did not engage the said contingent workers and continued

the engagement of contract labour in place of contingent

workers. In the mean time the Central Government passed

an order u/s 12(c) of Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 opining

as :

“The concerned workers are contingent/casual

workers, hence their claim to regularize their service is not

valid”, vide Exhibit-I. While the Association preferred a

Writ Appeal No. 352/98 before the Division Bench before

the Hon’ble Guwahati High Court against the judgment of

Single Judge and the Division Bench disposed of the said

W.A. vide judgment (marked as Exhibit-K) holding that if

4098

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

the appellants were aggrieved by the order of Govt. of

India, Ministry of Labour, declining to refer the dispute for

regularization the only course open to the applicants to

approach the Court by Writ Proceeding vide Exhibit-J. Upon

this findings of the Hon’ble High Court the Association

filed a Writ petition No. Civil Rule 6771/98 (Exhibit-K) and

the Hon’ble High Court passed an order directing the Central

Government to refer the claims of the Association for

regularization/conversion of their status as regular employee

of the ONGC in accordance with the Standing Order in force.

Then the management preferred Writ Appeal against the

judgment of the learned Single Judge passed in Civil Rule

No.6771/98 and the said Writ Appeal being No.371/05

(Exhibit-L) was disposed of affirming the judgment of the

Single Judge. Thereafter, the management preferred SLP

(Exhibit-M) before the Hon’ble Supreme Court against the

Writ Appeal No.371/05. The Hon’ble Supreme Court disposed

of the said SLP vide order dated 10.11.08 (marked as Exhibit-

M).

The workman witness No.1 further stated that the

contingent workers were doing the works of perennial in

nature and they used to work continuously throughout

the year while the management in order to deprive the

workers from regularistion made some artificial break but a

large number of workers who have completed 240 days of

continuous work within a period of 12 consecutive months

to become eligible for regularization. When the contingent

workers raised demand for regularistion of their service in

terms of the Certified Standing Order through their Union,

the management adopted the policy of engagement of

contract labourer against the said contingent workers with

a view to frustrate the genuine demand of the workers

which is against the principle laid down in Contract Labour

(Regulation & Abolition) Act,1970 and hence the tender

notice issued by the management in this connection is

liable to be quashed. Further contention of the workman

witness No.1 is that the management and the workers are

bound to abide by the Provision of Certified Standing Order

and as the workers concerned listed in Annexure-A (Exhibit-

N) have fulfilled the conditions of Certified Standing Order

they are entitled to be regularized. It is pointed out that a

section of workers have lost their documents like Identity

Card, certificate issued by the management and some of

the workers have documents to show that they have

completed more than 240 days of work in a relevant year.

The W.W.l has produced the list of 87 numbers of workers

Vide Exhibit’ A’ who completed 240 days of work within

the relevant period of 12 consecutive months as shown in

Exhibits-N(1) to Exhibit-N(109).

The workmen witness No.1 further stated that the

job relating to seismic survey and other connected job in

which the contingent workers have been employed is part

and parcel of day to day activity of ONGC which issued

various Circulars and Directives in connection with the

engagement, regularization and termination of contingent

workers besides Certified Standing Order. The W.W.1

mentioned that the workers as listed in Annexure-A have

fulfilled the conditions for regularization. The documents

Exhibit-N series [ Exhibits-N(1) to N(109)] clearly proved

that the workers have completed 240 days of work within a

period of 12 consecutive months in a year and they were

recruited through local employment exchange and as such,

the workers involved in this case deserve regularization.

During his cross-examination the workmen witness

No.1 stated that neither he produced any document to

show that other members of the Association entrusted him

to conduct the case nor did he submit any document to

show that he was Secretary of the Field Party Contingent

Workers Association. He said that in Exhibit-A he had

mentioned the names of the contingent workers who are

the members of the Association but he has not submitted

any paper to show that in fact they are the members of the

Association. He admitted the fact that the Exhibit-N (17)

the Certificate shows that the period of service rendered

by Sri Pradip Borah w.e.f 1.11.95 to 30.6.96 whereas the

same document annexed in Writ Petition being Civil Rule

No.5744/97 (Exhibit-1) at page 35 shows the period of service

rendered by Pradip Borah is 1.12.95 to 30.6.96 but he does

not know who had done manipulation (Exhibit-N-17) just

to show the working days as 240 days; Exhibit-N(1) (Proved

in original) is his (WW.1) own certificate issued by the

Party Chief of G.P.32, ONGC which shows that the period of

service rendered by him w.ef. 8.11.94 to 6.7.95 but in the

page 44 in Civil Rule No.5744/97 (Exhibit-1) his certificate

shows the period from 20.12.93 to 5.5.94. However, he denied

the suggestion tendered by the management that in the

Exhibit-N-1 he had manipulated the dates as 8.11.94 to 6.7.95

instead of 22.11.93 to 16.5.94. The W.W.1 also mentioned

that Exhibit-N(36) ( Proved in original) the letter shows that

the Memo No.JRT/EBG/GP-32/C/Workers/93-94 dated

30.6.92 and the said certificate issued to Prafulla Saikia

covers the period of his engagement as 2.11.91 to 30.6.92;

at page No.27 in Civil Rule No.5744/97 (Exhibit-1) the

certificate No. JRT/EBG/GP-32/C/Workers/93-94 dated

30.6.92 shows that Prafulla Saikia has worked from

22.11.93 to 16.5.94; Exhibit-N(36). But he denied that

the Exhibit-N(36) was not submitted before the Hon’ble

High Court and that in Exhibit-N(36) he had manipulated

the date with effect from 2.11.91 to 30.6.92 instead of

22.11.93 to 16.5.94 and also the date 30.6.92 given by

the party Chief in place of the date 16.5.94. He

categorically denied that they have fabricated/tempered

the dates mentioned in Exhibit-N(1) to Exhibits-N(109);

and that all the workmen have completed 240 days. He

further denied that they have produced all the documents

containing Exhibit-N(l) to Exhibit-N(109) just to show

that they had worked 240 days in a year. He again

mentioned that he has not submitted any document to

show that there are vacant post in ONGC, nor any document

to show that his name was forwarded by the local

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4099

employment exchange, nor any document showing

educational qualification of the workers. He again denied

the suggestion tendered by the management that some of

the persons named in Exhibit-A as mentioned in his evidence

on-Affidavit do not possess any working certificate and

that the Party Chief had no authority to issue experience

certificate as indicated in some of the documents marked

as Exhibits- N(l) to N(109). He also denied that the

temporary Identity Cards issued to the workers do not show

the engagement in ONGC as contingent workers and that

the statements made in para-25 and 26 in his evidence on

Affidavit are false and also the documents submitted by

him in this case are false just to show their entitlement of

working of 240 days in ONGC.

6.

Management Witness No.1, Sri Amit Kumar

Khulbe, Chief Geophycist, Geophysical Service, ONGC

Ltd. who was duly authorized by the management of ONGC

to depose in this Reference Case, stated that originally a

dispute was raised by the ONGC Filed Party Contingent

Workers Association on 21.6.96 before the Regional

Labour Commissioner (C), Guwahati claiming that there

was little more than 100 workers who have completed

requisite period of service vide Exhibit-2 while the

ONGC management resisted the allegations on the ground,

inter-alia, that the workers at the relevant time were

engaged on contingent basis, for works related to seismic

survey, only during the field season, and that none of the

contingent workers has ever worked for continuous 240

days in 12 consecutive month in a year. Subsequently FOC

report was submitted by the Assistant Labour

Commissioner, Dibrugarh to the Government of India,

Ministry of Labour and Employment. In the mean time

the workers Association filed Writ Petition in Civil Rule

No.5744/97 before the Hon’ble High Court claiming their

regularistion as per provision of Certified Standing Order

of the ONGC but the documents annexed in the said Writ

Petition does not show that any of the member of the

workers Association have ever completed 240 days work

in a year, while the workers Association has now annexed

the same set of documents in the instant case changing/

altering the period of service rendered by them in the said

documents and the certified copy of the said Writ Petition

in Civil Rule No.5744/97 has already been proved as

Exhibit-l. According to the MW No.1, upon rejection of

the Writ Petition by the Hon’ble High Court vide order

dated 11.12.97 the workers Association preferred Writ

Appeal being Writ Appeal No.16/97 and in the said Writ

Appeal the workers Association has produced some

documents but none of those documents shows that any

of the member of the workers Association has completed

240 day in a year. He has produced the certified copy of

Writ Appeal of 16 of 1997 as Exhibit-4. But the W.P. No.

5744 was disposed of by the Hon’ble High Court without

granting any relief with direction to the Government,

Ministry of Labour, to pass order u/s 12(5) of Industrial

Dispute Act, 1947 upon the FOC report dated 27.10.97

submitted by the ALC (C). Again the Workers Association

on being dissatisfied preferred Writ Appeal being No. 352/

98 before the Division Bench of the Hon’ble High Court. In

the mean time the Central Government passed an order dt.

28.10.98 u/s 12(5) of the Industrial Dispute Act,1947 opining

that there was no reason for referring the case to the

Industrial Tribunal for adjudication due to the reason:-

“The concerned workers are contingent casual

workers, hence their claim to regularize their service is not

valid” .

The Division Bench of the Hon’ble High Court, on

the other hand, dismissed the Writ Appeal No. 352/98

holding that if the Appellant was aggrieved by the order of

the Government of India, declining to refer the dispute as

aforesaid the only course open to them was to approach

the Court in a Writ Proceeding. Then the workers

Association filed Writ Petition being Civil Rule No.6771/98

before the Hon’ble Guwahati High Court seeking quashing

of the order dated 28.10.98 of the Central Government and

for direction to the Government of India to make Reference

u/s 10 of the I.D. Act and also to direct the ONGC not to

engage contractors to perform the work by the contingent

work. On 30.3.05 the learned Single Judge allowed the Writ

Petition being Civil Rule No.6771/98 with direction to the

Government of India to refer the claim of the workers

Association for regularization. While the ONGC filed a Writ

Appeal being Writ Appeal No.371/05 against the judgment

and order passed by the learned Single Judge on 30.3.05

but the said Writ Appeal was dismissed. Then the

management preferred a Special Leave Petition before the

Hon’ble Apex Court which was admitted staying the

operation of the impugned judgment and order dated

14.11.06 passed by the Hon’ble High Court. In the mean

time the Ministry of Labour and Employment, Government

of India passed an order of Reference dated 15.9.98 and

referred the dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal. On

being approached by the Management the Hon’ble

Supreme Court passed an order staying the operation of

the order dated 14-11-06 the Division Bench of the Gauhati

High Court. Ultimately the Hon’ble Supreme Court after

hearing the parties was pleased to pass an order on

10-11-08 modifying and restricting the terms of Reference;

-the case of those workers who claimed to have

completed 240 days of work within a period of 12

consecutive months in a year and also fulfill the conditions

for regularization their cases would be considered by Central

Government Industrial Disputes, Tribunal Guwahati.

M. W-1 further stated that the seismic survey is

conducted at different places from time to time, which starts

towards the beginning of November and ends before the

ends of June, next year which is called field season and

during rainy season the survey work can not be done and

the service of the workers have never been required by the

ONGC at any period before the field season. Hence, none

4100

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

of the contingent workers of the Association has ever

completed 240 days in a year and they were never engaged

permanently or on regular basis due to the uncertainty that

the seismic survey would be carried out and conducted in

the same field in the same locality and may be in different

field locality or may be in different State or far away from

the field where survey were undertaken last and it would

not have been possible for the Management to carry those

contingent labourers from one state or place to another. It

is also mentioned that while engaging the contingent

labourers of the workers Association their educational

qualification or other eligibility as required for making any

recruitment in the ONGC as per recruitment Rules has never

been considered, and as the mode of conducting seismic

survey was done almost in a primitive manner unlike to

that of Western Countries. Hence, the ONGC decided to

improve the standard of quality and production introducing

modern sophisticated machineries and improved mode of

conducting the survey. In order to minimize the expenditure

and to improve the quality of works the management floated

the tenders and got the job done by the contractors

resulting in increase in production along with quality and

reduction of expenditure to a great extent. It is also

contended by the management witness No.1 that the names

of the workers given in Annexure-A to their Written

Statement are not the members of the workers Association

and they had not been working as contingent workers

continuously since 1994 under the Dy. General Manager

(MM), ONGC. He also said that it is not true that the workers

had been working in the aforesaid job without any break

till 1997, since the engagement of contingent workers are

carried out by the field party for a particular field season

and for specific period and fresh engagement, on need

basis, is done for each field season. He further said that

depending upon the period each worker works for a field

season, workers are paid bonus against claim made by

them and the record of operational report and the record

pertaining to bonus paid to the concerned workers and it

would show that none of the worker has completed 240

days in any year. In this regard he proved the filed party

operational report submitted by the Party Chief,

Geophysical PartyNo.10, Vide Exhibit-5 and Exhibit-5 (1)

for the season1992-93 which shows that total number of

field days for the field season is 180 days. It is also mentioned

that the worker Gajan Hazarika named at Annexure-N(30)

worked in party No.10 for field season 1992-93 but he did

not work 240 days in a year. The management witness No.1

also added some reports of the field party operational report

submitted by the Party Chief marked as Exhibit-6/6(1),

Exhibit-7/7(1), Exhibit-8/8(1), Exhibit-9(1), Exhibit-10/10(1),

Exhibit-12/12(1).

The Management witness No.1 also proved the

Bonus register of the Geophysical party No.10, Camp

Kathigaon for the field season 1996-97 the Ex-gratia

payment contingent Bill marked as Exhibit-14, Exhibit-15.

The management witness No.1 also said that none of the

contingent workers has worked 240 days in a year and the

job performed by the said workers are unskilled job as

well as the said workers were not engaged against any

particular post or vacancy nor the contingent workers ever

held any particular post and hence, the question of their

regularistion does not arise since they were engaged in

field season only and their service automatically ended

during the field season. He also stated that the gate passes

annexed by the workers Association are over written/

tempered with and as such fabricated.

Further contention of the management witness is

that as per the guidelines issued by the Corporate HQRS

dated 5-1-1987 and 3-9-1990 only General Manager or an

Officer of Higher Rank authorized by the General Manager

can issue service certificate while the party Chief is not an

officer of higher rank and as such, he can not issue service

certificate. In this regard he has proved the copy of Certified

Standing Order of ONGC and the orders issued by Corporate

HQRS dated 5-1-1987 and 3-9-1990 vide Exhibit-16, 16(1)

and 16(2) respectively. He also added the jobs performed

by the contingent workers are of non-perennial nature and

there is no notification issued by the appropriate

Government for abolition of contract labour in respect of

the job done in relation to seismic work during the field

season. He stated that the management, with a view to

survive in the changed scenario, after introduction of the

new Exploration Licensing Policy of the Government of

India, having lost its monopoly, had to cut its surplus

workforce by introducing Voluntary Retirement Scheme

since 1999 and hence, there is no question of creating any

post/vacancy for appointment/regularization of any of the

members of the workers Association. He has proved the

new Exploration Licensing Policy released by the

Government of India, Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas,

and the VRS vide Exhibit-17 and 18 respectively. Under the

above circumstances the management witness No.1

mentioned that the prayer of the worker Association made

in their claim statement are liable to be rejected; and the

Reference as modified by the Hon’ble Supreme Court is

liable to be answered in negative against the workers

Association.

During the cross-examination, management witness

no.1 stated that they used to engage contingent workers

while performing the Geophysical survey and there is no

time limit for exploration during the field season in the

Geophysical survey and the period of work depends upon

the volume of works. He also confirmed that Geophysical

survey is started preferably in the month of November,

during the dry period and it continues upto June

approximately. He further stated that before starting the

seismic survey they engage persons to perform preparatory

works which require 10 to 15 days approximately and after

completion of survey also it requires 10 to 15 days to wind

up the infrastructural materials and these jobs are done by

the contingent workers. He further said that the Identity

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4101

Cards are issued by them to the contingent workers for the

field season only. He categorically denied that the

contingent workers were engaged prior to 15 days to start

the job. He also said that Exhibit-l0 the operation report on

Geophysical Party No.88 for the field season 1994-95 was

submitted after completion of the work in the month of

November,1995. But he did not know whether the works of

G. P.88 was continued after 94-95 for another season 95-96.

He added that the former contingent workers sometimes

may be reengaged for another season on their approach

along with other new workers. The management witness

No.1 again mentioned that the party Chief is authorized to

issue memorandum and the Exhibit- N(l) and N(3); the

Identity Cards were issued by their Organistion and the

party Chief is the competent to issue the same. He also

said that some of the memorandums issued from their office

in prescribed format and signed by the party Chief who

was duly authorized. But the Exhibits-N(51), N(61), N(62),

N(73), N(105) and N(109), the Certificates though appears

to be issued by their Organistion but not in prescribed

format and he can not authenticated these Certificates. He

also denied the suggestion tendered by the Union that the

Exhibit-5 to Exhibit-12 were prepared by them for the sake

of this case; and that all the contingent workers completed

240 days in a year and as such, they are entitled to

regularization. He also denied the suggestion advanced

by the adverse party that the contingent workers were

terminated only to introduce contract labour in their places

and issuing tender notice Ext.ER/MM/GSD/39/97-98, and

that the contingent workers were terminated illegally i.e.

why they had invited the said tender.

7.

The Management witness No.2, Shri Ram

Chandra Mishra, the Chief Geo Physicist of ONGC, Boroda

who was the party Chief w.e.f. May,1993 to December,1994.

He categorically mentioned that the signature contained in

Exhibit- N(l) was put by him but all the dates are manipulated,

i.e. the date of issue of memorandum is shown as 6-7-95

whereas on 6-7-95 he was in Kolkata Office. He also stated

that the date inserted in page 44 of the memorandum in

Exhibit-1 is the correct date i.e. 5-5-1994, and the period of

service shown in Annexure-N(l) of Exhibit-A with effect

from 8-11-04 to 6-7-95 is manipulated, the correct period

would be 20-12-93 to 5-5-94 as mentioned at page 44 of

Exhibit-l ( Civil Rule No. 5744 of 1997). The period shown in

Exhibit-N(36) as 2-11-1991 to 30-6-1992 is not genuine and

manipulated though the signature contained in Exhibit-

N(36) appears to be his own but the date below his signature

in Exhibit-N(36) is manipulated, the correct period of

the memorandum should have been 22-11-93 to 16-5-94

as contained in the memorandum dated 16-5-94 (at page

27 of Exhibit-l). He also mentioned that the Annexure-B

of Exhibit-l is a genuine document but the memorandum

shown in the Exhibit- N(36) reflecting 93-94 but the period

of service has been manipulated as 2-11-91 to 30-6-92

because the documents printed for 93-94 the period of

service 91-92 cannot be given. He also added that since he

did not even joined in G.P.32 on 30-6-92 at Jorhat there is no

question of issue the Certificate on that day i.e. 30-6-92 by

him since he joined in G.P. No. 32 in November,1992. In his

cross-examination he said that the printed memorandums

are filled up by their Office Clerk and he signed the

memorandums after verification, and they used to maintain

Attendance Register for all the workers but he did not

submit the Attendance Register. He again stated that the

hand writing of the memorandum are not the hand writing

of office clerk and so far he knew no clerk has done these

manipulations. He also mentioned that as Party Chief he

used to issue temporary Identity Card to the workers to

facilitate to enter into the premises for duty. He denied the

suggestion tendered by the Association that they used to

engage contingent workers prior to one month of the

establishment of the camp in the base area and that after

completion of the works the contingent workers remained

there for 15/20 days to wind up the miscellaneous works.

He also categorically denied that the contingent workers

worked for 240 days in a field season within a period of 12

consecutive months and that the entry of their duties for

more than 240 days is reflected in Attendance Register

which was not produced before the Court.

8.

On careful scrutiny of the pleadings of both the

parties along with the evidence on record as discussed

above, it appears that initially the dispute was raised by

the workers Association regarding regularization of a little

more than 100 contingent workers and on failure of the

conciliation the Conciliation Officer submitted FOC report

and in the meantime the workers Association preferred Writ

Petition being No.Civil Rule No.5744/97 (Exhibit-1) before

the Hon’ble Gauhati High Court for regularization of the

services of the contingent workers and also for restraining

the Management from engaging the contract labour to

perform the job of the contingent workers but the Hon’ble

High Court passed an order directing the Government of

India to pass orders U/S 12(5) of I.D.Act, 1947 for granting

any relief as prayed for. On being dissatisfied the workers

Association preferred Writ Appeal in 352/98 which affirmed

the decision of the Hon’ble Single Bench of the Hon’ble

High Court passed in Civil Rule No. 5744/97. In the mean

time the Government of India passed an order u/s 12 (5) of

the I.D. Act,1947 opining as :

“the concerned workers are contingent/casual

workers, hence, their claim to regularize their service is not

valid”

Then the workers Association filed another Writ

Petition being Ne. 6771/98 before the Hon’ble Gauhati High

Court seeking quashing of the order dated 28-10-98 passed

by the Central Government and also for a direction to the

Government of India to make a reference u/s 10 of the

4102

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

I.D. Act. Accordingly the Hon’ble High Court allowed the

Writ Petition in Civil Rule No.6771/98 with direction to the

Government of India to refer the claim of the ONGC workers

Association for regularisaton etc. In the mean time the

Management of ONGC filed Writ Appeal No. 371/2005 against

the judgment and order passed in the Civil Rule No.6771/98,

but the said appeal was dismissed. While the Management

of ONGC filed Special Leave Petition being No.3278/07 before

the Hon’ble Supreme Court. Accordingly the Hon’ble

Supreme Court passed an order for issue of Notice staying

the operation of the impugned judgment and order of the

Division Bench of the Hon’ble High Court passed in Writ

Appeal No.371/05. Meanwhile, the Government of India,

Ministry of labour issued an order of reference in pursuance

of the order of the learned Single Judge, Gauhati High Court

passed in Civil Rule No.5744/97 and referred the dispute for

adjudication to this Tribunal (as per the Schedule mentioned

above) but the said Reference case was stayed in view of

the order dated 8-4-2008 passed by the Hon’ble Supreme

Court. Ultimately the Hon’ble Supreme Court after hearing

the parties was pleased to pass an order dated 10-11-08

modifying and restricting the terms of reference as under:

“We have heard learned counsel for the parties.

Learned counsel for the parties agreed that the cases

of those workers who claimed to have completed 240 days

of work within a period of 12 consecutive months in a year

and also fulfill the conditions for regularization their cases

would be considered by Central Government Industrial

Disputes, Tribunal Guwahati. The case of the petitioners

ONGC is that none of the workers have completed 240

days in a year. This dispute shall be adjudicated by the

Central Government, Industrial Tribunal, Guwahati. Since

the matter is pending for quite sometime, we request the

tribunal to decide the dispute between parties as

expeditiously as possible in any event within six months

from today. With these observations, the special leave

petition is disposed of” .

9.

Thus it is clear that the issue before this Tribunal

is to consider the case of those workers who have

completed 240 days of work within a period of 12

consecutive months in a year and also fulfilled the

conditions for regularization. To ascertain the period of

works done by the contingent workers, this Tribunal has

got no other alternative but to rely upon the documents

produced by the workmen vide Exhibit-N series (i.e. Exhibit-

N-l to Exhibits-N-109) and the documents relied upon by

the workers Association in the Civil Rule No. 5744/97

preferred by them before the Hon’ble High Court which

were submitted by the Management vide Exhibit-l series

(in 82 pages). Although, the workers Association in their

evidence mentioned that the Attendance Register of the

contingent workers were maintained by the Management

but the workers Association did not take any step for calling

for the Attendance Register nor any other document from

the custody of the Management in order to shift their

burden to establish their plea. It is found admitted that the

regularization of the workers is to be considered as per the

provisions of the Certified Standing Order and the relevant

Circulars/Orders issued by the ONGC Management from

time to time.

10. Let me examine the documents marked as

Exhibit-N series proved by the workers Association wherein

the particulars of 87 numbers of workers have been given.

The Exhibit-N(l) regarding engagement of workman

Jitumoni Bora (W.W.l) & Exhibit-N(2) the Identity Card

issued in the name of the workman, Jitumoni Bora, the

Secretary, ONGC Field Party Contingent Workers

Association, Jorhat, shows on the face of those documents

some over writing and mark of erasing on the date/period

of employment, the date of issue and the date of signature.

In Exhibit-N(l) the number of Memorandum i.e. JRT/EBG/

GP-32/C/Workers/94-95 dated 6.7.95 has been shown as

JRT/EBG/GP-32/C/Workers/93-94 Date 5.5.94 in the

documents at page 44 of Exhibit-l, submitted before the

Hon’ble High Court in Civil Rule No.5744/97( Exhibit-l) by

the Workers Association. In the said document the period

of engagement has been shown as 08.11.94 to 6.7.95 and

the date of issue of the Memorandum has been shown as

06.7.95 while in page 44 of the Exhibit-l the period of

engagement appears as 20.12.93 to 5.5.94 and the date of

issue of the Memorandum as 5.5.94. In Exhibit-N(2), the

validity period of issue of the temporary Identity Card has

been shown as 20.11.95 to 17.7.96 while in the similar

document at page-43 of Exhibit-l the period has been shown

as 23.01.95 to 17.04.95 and the Field season as 1994-95. In

Exhibit-N(2) the period 20.11.95 to 17.7.1996 appears to have

been typed out later on and the entries against the field

season 1994-95 has been disappeared. If we rely upon the

documents of page-44 and 43 in Exhibit-I, it is clear that the

concerned workman has not completed 240 days of work

during 1993-94 whereas the period of engagement from

8.11.94 to 6.7.95 as shown in Exhibit-N(1), the workman

appears to have completed 240 days but the said document

is found to be tempered/fabricate on the face of it. As such,

it cannot be admitted as it raised sufficient doubts in arriving

at the decision regarding the period of working days in

respect of the workman Sri Jitumoni Bora. Exhibit-N(3) &

N(4) appears to be Identity Card in respect of Amulya Saikia

issued by the Party Chief, GP-88 on 1.11.92 which was

valid upto June 1993 and the Exhibit-N(4) was issued without

giving any date for the field season 1994-95. In these

documents there is no specific period of working days. If

we accept the Exhibit-N(3) which was issued on 1.11.92

and the same was valid upto June,1993 the number of

working days appears less than 240 days. However, no

opinion can be formed on the Exhibit-N(4) as there is no

mention of period of engagement. In the Certificate marked

as Exhibit-N(5) regarding engagement of workman Nripen

Lohan, it appears that the said printed certificate has been

filled up in different hand writing with different ink and in

place of the total number of days both in figure and in word

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4103

there appears some manipulation and fabrication with

different hand writing as such, the said documents is liable

to rejected. The Identity Cards issued in the name of the

workmen Nripen Lahon marked as Exhibit-N(6), N(7), N(8)

do not reflect the period of engagement and hence, no

opinion can be drawn on these documents as to the period

of the works rendered by the workman Nripen Lohan. The

Exhibit-N(9), the Identity Card issued in the name of

workman Kula Dutta shows the field season 1995-96 and

nothing else, which was valid upto June 1996 and on the

basis of this Identity Card it can not be opined that the

workman has completed 240 days. Similarly in Exhibits-

N(10), N(11), & N(12) the Identity Card in respect of Jiban

Saikia and Promod Dutta there are the mention of season

1994-95, 1995-96 and valid upto June, 1992 respectively as

such, no inference can be drawn as to the working period

of the said workman.

Further in Exhibit-N(13), the certificate issued by the

Party Chief of G. P-23 in the name of the workman Nogen

Borah, it appears that there are some over writing/

manipulation in the date from 2.11.84 to 30.6.85 showing

240 days but this document can not be accepted due to

doubts as to its genuinity so the workman Nogen Borah is

not found to have established that he had completed 240

days of work. The Exhibit-N(14), the Identity Card issued

in the name of Ratul Dutta for the period valid upto

June,1996 and in the Exhibit-N(15), the Identity Card

issued against the said Ratul Dutta on 1.7.96 but both the

Identity Cards do not mention the period of employment.

The Identity Card marked as Exhibit-N(16) issued in the

name of Pradip Bora for the field season 1994-95 also

does not contain any date of engagement. In Exhibit-N(17),

the Memorandum issued in the name of workman Pradip

Bora shows the period of engagement with effect from

1.11.1995 to 30.6.1996 while in page 35 of Exhibit-1

the date of engagement has been shown with effect from

1.12.95 to 30.6.96 thus both the Exhibit-N(17) and page

35 of Exhibit-1 are found not the same in respect of the

date of engagement. Further in Exhibit-N(17) the date,

1.11.95 appears to have been fabricated/tempered as such,

the document marked as Exhibit- N(17) can not be

accepted. Exhibits-N(18), N(19) are the Identity Cards

in respect of the workman Amrit Kotoky and Torun Borah

but these cards do not show any specific period of work

moreover the dates of issue of these Identity Cards also

appears to have been over written. The Exhibit-N(20) to

Exhibit-N(22) are the Identity Cards in respect of the

workmen Gajen Hazarika issued on 2.11.93. These Cards

also do not reflect the period of work. Exhibit-N(23)

appears to be the Identity Card in respect of workman

Sushil Lahon but there is no mention of the period of

service. The Exhibits-N(24) & N(25) are the Identity

Cards in the name of workman Horeswar Boro but there

is no mention of the period of working days. Exhibits-

N(26) & N(27) are Identity Cards issued in favour of the

workman Profullo Bora issued on 1.11.95 and 11.11.96

respectively but there is nothing to show as to the working

period. Exhibit-N(28), N(29) are the Identity Cards in respect

of the workman Abony Gogoi and Robin Neog where there

is no mention of the working period. Exhibit-N(30) to Exhibit-

N(32) are the Identity Cards in respect of the workmen

Girin Baruah, Bidyut Baruah and Jayanta Kalita showing

the validity of the issue of the Identity Card for the period

03.11.95 to 30.6.96, 01.11.95 to 30.6.95 and 03.12.94 to June,95

respectively but there appears to be some over writing/

manipulation in the dates mentioned above. These Identity

Cards also do not specifically mentioned the period of

working days and hence, these are not acceptable. Exhibit-

N(33) , N(35), N(36), N(38) ,N(39) to N(40), N(44), N(49),

N(66), N(71) are the memorandum issued in favour of the

workmen Puneswar Borah, Prahlad Neog, Prafulla Saikia,

Rabul Neog, Biman Saikia, Devon Prasad Baruah, Ajit

Gohain, Ridip Borah, Ratul Sarmah and Mahendra Saikia

respectively, but on scrutiny it is seen that the dates of

working period are found tempered/ fabricated in all cases

and hence, these documents can not be accepted.

Exhibit-N(34) is the Identity Card issued in favour of the

workman Ajay Phukan but there is no mention of the

working period. Exhibit-N(37), N(41) to No.(43), N(47), N(48),

N(50), N(52), N(54) to N(59), N(63) to N(65), N(67) to N(70),

N(74), N(75), N(77), N(79), N(80) to N(88), N(90), N(92),

N(93), N(95) to N(102), N(107) and N(108) are the Identity

Cards issued in favour of the workmen Romen Bora, Nirmal

Neog, Ashok Bora, Dibeswar Chutia, Budheswar Dwora,

Tankeswar Saikia, Rajen Bora, Pulin Dutta, Robin Borgohain,

Romesh Gogoi, Bipul Bhuiya, Robi Borah, Rikeswar

Kochari, Nipul Saikia, Suresh Bora, Bibhu Charan Dutta,

Nayan Borah, Jitu Dutta, Romen Saikia, A. Kalita, Tapan

Bora, Ranjit Bora, Anil Kochari, Bipul Dwara, Amulya

Regon, Ridip Gogoi, Prabin Nagaria, Jyogeswar Mili, Gokul

Mili, Dul Borah, Rajib Saikia, Ajit Dutta, Ranjit Kr. Saikia,

Pranab Gogoi, Tapan Kakoti, Bipin Gogoi, Mridul Gogoi,

Dulu Bhuiya, Pabitra Dutta, Sujadul, Puna Gogoi, Ranjit

Rajkonwar, Makhon Neog, Pradip Bora, Nabajyoti Bora,

Padma Bora, respectively. On examination of these

documents it is found that in most of the Identity Cards the

dates of validity are found tempered and fabricated on the

face of those and in some of the documents the exact period

of validity have also not been mentioned. In such a situation

neither the aforesaid documents can be admitted nor any

opinion be formed in respect of the period of working of

the aforesaid workmen.

The Association has relied upon Exhibit-N(51) which

a list of off season workers issued by the Party Chief of GP-

33 it does not reflect any working days. Exhibit-N(60), is a

certificate issued in favour of the workman Prabin Ch. Borah

but there is no mention of period of work. The

Exhibit-N(61) is an experience certificate issued in the name

of the workman Suren Chutia showing the date of working

with effect from 9.11.84 to 15.7.85 but this certificate has

been written in different hand writing with different ink

also, as such, this certificate is also found doubtful. The

4104

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Exhibit-N(62) is a certificate issued in favour of the workman

Suren Chutia but the said certificate is found having without

any office seal as such, this so called experience certificate

cannot be accepted. Exhibit-N(72) is also a certificate issued

by the Party Chief of GP-36 in favour of Tankeswar Saikia

and this certificate also does not indicate any period of

work. The Exhibit-N(73) a list of workers who were engaged

during the off season in 1996 but there is no specific mention

of period of engagement.

The Association has also exhibited the Affidavits

marked as Exhibit-N(91) & N(94) sworn in by Sri Pranab

Gogoi and Sri Thaneswar Gogoi stating that they are known

as Bhogeswar Gogoi and Bepen Gogoi Respectively

without having any relevancy with the list of workers as

mentioned in the list appended with their claim statement

& hence these two documents are also found of no help to

the Association in connection with the calculation of

working days. The workman Witness No.1, Sri Jitumoni

Bora in his evidence clearly mentioned that altogether 87

numbers of workers have completed 240 days of work within

the relevant period of consecutive 12 months but the

supporting documents are found not at all acceptable and

reliable as observed above. In his cross-examination he

admitted that they have submitted a Writ Petition filed in

Civil Rule No.5744/97 vide Exhibit-1 wherein Exhibit-1(1) is

his signature. He also admitted the discrepancies made in

some of the entries in regard to the working period

mentioned in the documents annexed with Exhibit-1 and

those proved by him vide Exhibit-N(l) to Exhibit-N(109). He

categorically mentioned that he can not say who have

manipulated the said documents marked as Exhibit-N(l) to

Exhibit-N(109). Thus it is crystal clear that the documents

proved by the Association vide Exhibit-N(91) to Exhibit-

N(109) are found not acceptab1e in order to establish the

plea in order to justify their claim that all the workmen have

completed .240-days of service in 12 consecutive months

on the strength of the documents marked as Exhibit-N

series.

The Management Witness No.1 Sri Amit Kumar

Khulbe in his deposition categorically stated that the

seismic survey work is conducted in selected field which

begins towards beginning of November and ends before

the end of June next year; and none of the workers have

completed 240 days in a year. He also denied that all the

workers mentioned in the Annexure-A to the written

statement submitted by the Association were not the

workers of the said Association and most of them did not

work as contingent worker in ONGC since 1994. In support

of his contention the management witness No.1 has

submitted the Field Report of CDP seismic Survey vide

Exhibit-5 ( proved in original) for the field season 1992-93,

Exhibit-6 ( proved in original) is the operational report on

24/48 Fold CDP Reflection Survey for the season 1984-85;

Exhibit-7 ( Proved in original) is Operational Report on 48

Fold CDP Seismic Survey for the field season 1992-93;

Exhibit-8 ( proved in original), is the operational report on

48 Fold CDP seismic reflection survey for the field season

1993-94; Exhibit-9 (proved in original) the operational report

on 48 fold CDP seismic Reflection Survey for the field season

1994-95; Exhibit-10 (proved in original), the operational

report on 48 Fold CDP Reflection Survey for the field season

1994-95; Exhibit-11 (proved in original), the operational

report on 48 Fold CDP Seismic Survey for the field season

1991-92; Exhibit-12 (proved in original) operational report

on 48 Fold CDP Reflection Survey for the field season

1994-95. From the Exhibits-5 to Exhibits-12, it appears that

the field season started on 4.11.92 and closed on 2.5.93;

from 14.11.84 to 4.6.85; from 20.11.92 to 14.5.93; from 1.11.93

to 30.5.94; from 11.11.94 to 29.6.93; from 11.11.94 to 27.6.95;

from 17.10.91 to 27.5.92 and from 11.11.94 to 28.6.95

respectively. He also stated that the gate passes are issued

to the workers for various purposes and the same are issued

to the outsiders and the gate passes annexed by the

Association in the Written Statement are over written,

tempered and as such fabricated. The Management witness

No.2 Shri Ram Chandra Mishra categorically pointed out

that he was posted as Party Chief in ONGC, Jorhat with

effect from May,1993 to December, 1994 and was transferred

to Kolkata office on 29.5.95 and hence the signature

contained in Annexure N/1 of Exhibit-A is his own

signatures but the dates are manipulated. He also said that

the period of service in Anexure-N/l, N/36 are also

manipulated. From the discussion of evidence of workman

witness No.1 and Management witness No.1 & 2 as regards

period of 240 days of work in 12 consecutive months in

respect of the workmen as claimed by the Association it is

revealed that the document marked as Exhibit-N(l) to

Exhibit-N(109) which are the solitary supporting testimony

relied upon by the workers Association are not admissible

in law and even the testimony of the W.W.l is found not

reliable. Moreover, all the documents marked as Exhibit-N(l)

to Exhibit-N(109) are found not genuine, trustworthy and

free from doubts. On the other hand, the evidence of the

Management witness is found untwisted unshaken rather

supported by the documents relied upon by him.

11. Mr. S.Das, learned Advocate for the workmen

submitted that the workmen have been working under the

management of ONGC for long period and most of them

have completed 240 days of work within 12 consecutive

months but the management with a view to deprive the

workmen to be regularized made some artificial breaks

although they were engaged during the whole year and

even they were allowed to work under roof in the rainy

season. He also pointed out that the management simply

denied the contention of the workers and they have

suppressed the real fact for which they did not produce

the Attendance Register and Pay Roll of the workers.

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4105

Mr. P.K. Roy, learned Advocate for the Management, on

the other hand, vehemently opposing the contention of

Mr. S.Das, learned Advocate for the Association submitted

that it is the onus on the part of the workmen to stand on

their own leg in order to establish their pleadings; the

Association neither called for the record nor did produce

any authentic documents in support of their claims. Mr.

Roy also submitted that the Association have not come

with clean hand in order to secure equity since the

documents submitted by them vide Exhibit-N series are all

fabricated and tempered and as such, they are not entitled

to any relief. In this context Mr. Roy cited the decisions

held in Range Forest Officer-vrs-S.T.Hadimani reported in

(2002) 3 SCC 25, wherein it was observed that where the

workman’s claim that he had worked for more than 240

days in the year preceding his termination was denied by

the employer it is for the claimant to lead evidence to that

effect; and that the workmen’s affidavit was not sufficient

evidence for that purpose. He also brought to my notice

the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in BSNL& Ors.

vs-Mohesh Chand reported in(2008) 3 SCC 474 that the

legal position reiterated that initial onus is on the \workman

to prove that he worked for240 days in a year. Considering

the evidence adduced by both the sides and having regard

to the ratio of the cases cited by the learned Counsels I

find no force in the argument of Mr. S. Das, learned

Advocate for the Association.

12. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in their order dated

10.11.08 passed in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 3278

of 2007 directed this Tribunal to consider the case of those

workers who claimed to have completed 240 days of work

within a period of 12 consecutive months and also fulfilled

the conditions for regularization. It appears from the

pleadings of both the sides that both the parties relied

upon the Standing Order for contingent employees of the

ONGC (proved by the workmen as Exhibit-B) regarding

regularization of the workmen which was framed under

the Provision of Industrial Employment (Standing order)

Act,1946. Clause 2(ii) of the said Standing Order, provided

that the workman who has been on the Roll of the

Commission and has put in not less than 180 days of

attendance in any period of 12 months shall be a temporary

workman, provided that a temporary workman who has put

not less than 240 days of work in any period of 12

consecutive months and who possess the minimum

qualification prescribed by the Commission may be

considered for conversion as regular employee. Clause-

2(i) of the Certified Standing Orders as aforesaid laid down

the classification of workmen as the contingent employees

shall hereafter be classified as temporary and casual while

Sub-Clause-III of Clause-2 provided that the workman who

is neither temporary nor regular shall be considered as

casual workman. The Association also relied upon the

Office order No. 103(98)/67-ENT dated 1.8.67 issued by the

Assistant Director on behalf of the Director of

Administration ONGC (Enclosed as Annexure-A series with

the Additional Written Statement submitted by the

Association) and No.27(70)/87-IR dated 16.7.1991 issued

by the General Manager (Personnel), ONGC, wherein it has

been stipulated that the contingent workers may be

absorbed against the regular posts provided :-

(a) They have completed 240 working days service in the

Commission in the 12 consecutive months;

(b) They are registered with the Employment Exchange;

(c) They are held against regular posts;

(d) They possess requisite qualifications and experience

etc., laid down in the Recruitment Regulation of ONGC.

13. The Management in their W.S. as well as

evidence on oath categorically stated that the contingent

workers were appointed by them without considering their

requisite qualification nor on being recommended by the

local Employment Exchange; and the said contingent

workers were engaged for doing some unskilled and non-

perennial nature of work. The workman witness No.1 in his

evidence mentioned that the work done by the workman

was perennial in nature and they are having requisite

qualification but there is nothing on record to show that

the workmen were discharging the function of perennial in

nature and there requisite qualification for the posts held

by them. There is also no iota of evidence to show that the

workmen were appointed against any regular vacancy and

they were recommended by the local employment exchange.

In course of argument Mr. P.K.Roy, learned Advocate for

the Management submitted that the nature of work

discharged by the members of the contingent workers

Association are purely temporary and unskilled and they

are also not engaged against any regular vacancy and they

rendered services as casual employees for a particular

period i.e. during the field season which starts from the

month of November and closed on the first part of June

and as such, they are not entitled to regularization as

claimed. In support of his contention Mr. P.K.Roy, relied

upon the case in Secretary, State of Karnataka and ors—

vs- Umadevi(3) and Ors. (2006) 4 SCC. 1 wherein it was

observed that while, directing the appointment, temporary

or casual, be regularized or made permanent, the Courts are

swayed by the fact that the person concerned has worked

for some time and in some cases for a considerable length

of time; such an argument fails when tested on the

touchstone of constitutionality and equality of opportunity

enshrined in Article 14 of the Constitution; merely because

a temporary employee or a casual wage worker is continued

for a time beyond the term of his appointment, he would

not be entitled to be absorbed in regular service or made

permanent merely on the strength of such continuance, if

the original appointment was not made by following due

process of selection as envisaged by the relevant Rules. It

is also mentioned by their Lordship that it is not as if the

4106

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

person who accepted an engagement neither temporary

nor casual in nature is not aware of the nature of his

employment; he accepts the employment with open eyes.

It was further observed in Umadevi’s Case that Article 309

of the Constitution contemplated the drawing up of a

procedure and Rules to regulate the recruitment and

regulate the service conditions of appointees appointed to

Public Services Post in connection with the affairs of the

Union or in of the State; and the State being a Model

Employer enacted the EMPLOYMENT EXCHANGE

(COMPULSORY NOTIFICATION OF VACANCY)

ACT,1959 to ensure equal opportunity for employment

seeker which place obligation on the employer to notify

the vacancy that may arise in the various departments and

those vacancies based on the procedure. Mr. Roy, learned

Advocate for the management also relied upon the decision

laid down in Official Liquidator -vrs- Dayanand and Ors

published in (2008) 10 SCC 1.

14. The evidence on record shows that the

contingent workers were engaged by the Management for

the works to be done for field season i.e. for a particular

period & they were not appointed against any regular

vacancy notifying the Employment Exchange by the

employer, nor they could fulfill the other conditions for

regularization stipulated in the Certified Standing Order as

well as the Office Order issued by the ONGC from time to

time’as mentioned above. Further there is nothing on record

to show that the qualification of the workers were examined

by the management at the time of their engagement also

there is no evidence to show that the contingent workers

were appointed against regular vacancies.

15. During the course of the argument Mr. S.Das,

learned Advocate for the Association took the plea that

the Management in order to deprive the members of the

contingent workers Association, indulge in unfair labour

practice by adopting the Contract Labour System for doing

the works done by the workers Association through the

Contract labourers which is against the Principle of Law

and hence the Management should be restrained from

engaging the contract Labour and also to quash the Tender

Notice No. ER/MM/GSD/39/97-98 issued by the Dy.

General Manager (MM), Exploration Business Group,

ONGC, Sibsagar. He also added that the Management of

ONGC also followed the unfair Policy of giving some

artificial/ frictional breaks besides arbitrary, in order to

disentitled the workers from getting regularization. In this

connection Mr. Das, learned Advocate cited the decision

laid down in Division Forest Officer, Salooni, Chamba -

VRS - Singh reported in (2013 (137) FLR 100 H.P that

the State being welfare State could not indulge in unfair

labour practice to give artificial/ frictional break besides

arbitrary was also unreasonable and shortage of few days

should have been condoned. Hence Mr. Das learned

Advocate contended that the said tender Notice is liable

to be set aside and the members of the Field Party

Contingent Workers Association as mentioned in List

marked as Exhibit-A are entitled to be regularized.

16. Mr. P.K Roy, vehemently objected to the

submission of the learned Advocate for the Association

stating that the Management in pursuance of the new

Policy adopted by the Government regarding exploration

of Oil and Natural Gas in the Country and with a view to

resist in the competitive market, adopted different policies

for minimizing their establishment expenditure and to earn

profit by utilizing experts and skilled persons and also to

engage sophisticated as well as modern technique of

exploration followed the measures of restricting the

creation of posts and also abolishing some of the posts

by providing VRS Schemes; inviting for the Bids in the

market for procuring the service of labour through

contractor and as such there is no illegality on the part of

the Management in issuing the tender notice. He also

added that the Hon’ble Gauhati High Court as well as the

Apex Court in their Judgment passed in Civil Rule No.

5744/97, SLP(Civil) No.3278 of 2007 did not grant any

relief of quashing the Tender Notice published by the

Management as prayed for by the workmen; and hence

this Tribunal can not consider this prayer of the workmen

at this stage. Considering the above circumstances and

the submission of learned Advocates for both the sides as

well as having regard to the judgment and order passed by

the Hon’ble Gauhati High Court in Writ Petition being

Civil

Rule

No.

5744/97,

Writ

Appeal

No. 352/98 and SLP (Civil) No. 3278 of 2007, I find no

scope to entertain the claim of the Association as regards

quashing of the Tender Notice No. ER/MM/GSD/39/97-

98 issued by the Dy. General Manager (MM), Exploration

Business Group, ONGC, Sibsagar.

17. In view of my finding as well as the discussion

as above it can safely be held that the ONGC Field Party

Contingent Workers Association has miserably failed to

establish their claim that they have completed 240 days

of work within 12 consecutive months, also they could

not prove that they have fulfilled the other criterion for

regularisition as contemplated in the Certified Standing

Order of ONGC and Office orders/Memorandum issued

by the ONGC from time to time. Accordingly, I find no

hesitation to come to a conclusion that ONGC Field Party

Contingent Workers Association have failed to establish

their claim for regularisation and as such they are not

entitled to any relief.

18. In the result, this Reference is answered in

negtive against the ONGC Field Party Contingent

Workers Association.

Send the Award to the Government of India as per

procedure.

Given under my han d and seal of this Court on this

31st day of May, 2013, at Guwahati.

L. C. DEY, Presiding Officer

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4107

ubZ fnYyh] 2 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1546-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ ,l- lh-

lh- ,y- ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds

chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV (la[;k 25@2008)

dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 02&07&2013 dks

izkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹iQk- la- ,y& 22013@1@2013&vkbZ vkj(lh&IIº

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 2nd July, 2013

S.O. 1546.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central

Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,

Hyderabad (No. 25/2008) as shown in the Annexure, in the

Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of SCCL and their workmen, which was

received by the Central Government on 02-07-2013.

[ F. No. L-22013/1/2013-IR(C-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AT HYDERABAD

PRESENT : Smt. M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer

Dated the 22nd day of May, 2013

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L. C. NO. 25/2008

Between :

Sri Bhuddavaram Giridhar,

S/o Sampath Kumar,

C/o Smt. A. Sarojana, Advocate,

Flat No. G7, Ground Floor,

Rajeshwari Gayatri Sadan,

Opp: Badruka Jr. College for Girls,

Kachiguda, Hyderabad.

. . .Petitioner

AND

1.

The General Manager,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

Mandamarri Area, Mandamarri

Adilabad District.

2.

The Superintendent of Mines,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

Kasipeta Mine, Mandamarri Area,

Mandamarri. Adilabad District. . . . Respondents

APPEARANCES:

For the Petitioner: M/s. A. Sarojana & K. Vasudeva

Reddy, Advocates

For the Respondent: Sri M.V. Hanumantha Rao,

Advocate

AWARD

Petitioner, Sri Bhuddavaram Giridhar who has been

working as a badli filler for the M/s. Singareni Collieries

Company Ltd., filed this petition invoking Sec.2A(2) of

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 seeking for declaring the

impugned order No.MMR/PER/D/072/4269 dated 7-8-2005

issued by the first respondent as illegal and arbitrary and

to set aside the same consequently direction the

respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service duly

granting all other consequential benefits such as continuity

of service, back wages and all other attendant benefits.

2. The averments made in the petition in brief are as follows:

Petitioner was appointed as badli filler in 1999 and

since then till the year 2002 he was regular to his duties.

During the year 2003 his leg got fractured accidentally and

further he suffered other family problems. A charge sheet

dated 29-12-2004 was issued alleging that petitioner

remained absent during the year 2003 which amounts to

misconduct under company standing order 25.25. He

submitted his explanation explaining his inability to perform

his duties regularly during that year but without considering

the same an enquiry was conducted with a predetermined

notion. During that enquiry petitioner was not given any

opportunity much less valid in nature. Basing on such lop

sided enquiry the enquiry officer held the charges as proved.

Basing on the erroneous findings of the enquiry officer

show cause notice dated 17.4.2005 was issued to which

petitioner submitted his reply. However, without considering

the merits of the same he was dismissed from service, with

effect from 18.8.2005 vide office order dated 7-8-2005.

Petitioner could not attend to his duties regularly during

the year 2003 only on account of his ill-health and other

family problems. He submitted the same to his authorities

time and again and also pleaded that he will attend the

duty without absence in future, but the same were not

considered. The action of the respondents in dismissing

the petitioner from service is wholly illegal, arbitrary,

violative of principles of natural justice. The enquiry was

not properly conducted. The procedure of enquiry was

not explained to the petitioner. He was not offered the

assistance of any defence assistant. Thus, he could not

effectively participate in the enquiry and he could not mark

the medical and other documents on his behalf to prove

his ill health. Though he has shown all the prescriptions

and other records pertaining to his continued ill health,

none of them were marked by the enquiry officer. The

submissions made by the petitioner were ignored on the

pretext that he could not substantiate his claim with relevant

4108

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

proof. As a result of the improper conduct of enquiry great

prejudice is resulted to the petitioner. He was not given

opportunity to produce his witnesses. The enquiry officer

relied upon the evidence of irrelevant witnesses who got

no personal knowledge of the charge alleged against the

petitioner and the documents which were neither shown

nor furnished to the petitioner either before or during the

enquiry and which are also not establishing the charge

alleged. No valid reasons are given for his findings by the

enquiry officer. The enquiry officer grossly erred in holding

the charges as proved. The enquiry officer and the

Disciplinary Authority proceeded with a preconceived

notion as if petitioner accepted the charges alleged, which

is not correct. The enquiry proceeding were not held in the

language known to the petitioner. The findings of

Disciplinary Authority are out side the scope of the charge

sheet as such the impugned order of dismissal order dated

7-8-2005 is liable to be treated as bad in law. Petitioner is

the sole bread winner of the family consisting of old aged

ailing parents, grant parents, wife and children. As a result

of petitioner's dismissal from service his family is rendered

without any livelihood. Petitioner could not attend to his

duties during the year 2003 only on account of his ill health

and family problems. Even otherwise the punishment of

dismissal from service is too harsh, excessive and

disproportionate to the charges alleged. Petitioner has not

gainfully employed elsewhere from the date of dismissal.

Without admitting the charges alleged against the petitioner

even if they are rightly held to be proved, petitioner craves

indulgence of this court to modify the punishment to any

other lesser punishment so as to survive himself and to

look after the family. Hence the petition.

4. Respondents filed their counter with averments in brief

as follows:

Petitioner has not followed the proper procedure to

entertain the industrial dispute, by straight away

approaching the court without seeking for conciliation.

The state amendment is not applicable to the Central

Government undertakings. Petitioner was dismissed from

service with effect from 18-8-2005, whereas he raised the

dispute in the year 2008 without explaining the reasons for

delay. Thus, the petition is liable to be dismissed for want

of maintainability, delay and latches. Petitioner was

dismissed from service on proved charge of absenteeism

after conducting a detailed domestic enquiry duly following

the principles of natural justice. Petitioner was initially

appointed as floating badli filler on 23-7-99 and continued

to be so till the date of his dismissal. His contention that he

was regular to the duties till the year 2002 is denied. His

other contention that in the year 2003 he sustained fracture

to his leg accidentally and suffered other family problems

is also denied. During the course of enquiry petitioner

submitted one OP ticket No.10508 from Area Hospital,

Ramakrishanpur for the period from 17-4-2003 to 21-10-2003.

Even during this period he remained absent at the hospital

from 18-6-2003 to 20-10-2003. When he was being extended

treatment at Colliery Hospital he should have continued

treatment and there was no need for his to be absent from

treatment. Hence, the period form 18-6-2003 to 20-10-2003

shall also be deemed as unauthorized absenteeism and it

can not be accounted as sick period. The period from

17-4-2003 to 17-6-2003 was not treated as absenteeism and

not included in the charge sheet. During the year 2003

petitioner has put in 10 musters only excluding the sick

period and remained unauthorisedly on all other days which

constitutes misconduct under respondent company's

Standing Orders 25.25 which reads as.

“25.25:- Habitual late attendance or habitual absence from

duty without sufficient cause. ”

Petitioner stated in his written statement that he

suffered fracture to his leg in April, 2003, under gone

treatment in area hospital Ramakarishnapur and in a private

hospital and assured to be regular to duties. But, he did

not submit any medical reports, prescription slips for the

alleged treatment he has under gone. He failed to

communicate his inability to attend duties to the unit level

authorities or to the area level Management as he was

supposed to do. He did not post any information at all.

Further, if he ought not to have absented from area hospital,

Ramakrishnapur. If he wants to be away from hospital, he

should have obtained prior permission from hospital

superintendent. Even after being declared fit for duty, he

was not regular to duties. His attendance before the

accident too is not satisfactory. In the year 2004 he put in

just 43 musters. Thus, his contention that he was not regular

to duties due to the fracture of the leg is not correct.

Petitioner claims that though he explained the reason for

his inability to attend duties, the merit of the same were not

considered and that with a pre-determined notion the

enquiry was conducted are all incorrect. Petitioner was

given every opportunity to defend his case, to submit

witnesses and to record evidence in his support and to

cross examine the witnesses examined on behalf of the

Management, during the enquiry. His contention that it is

a lop sided enquiry is incorrect. His further contention that

he was dismissed from service without considering merits

of his submissions is also incorrect. By giving full and fair

opportunity to the petitioner, in compliance of the principles

of natural justice, the enquiry was conducted and

disciplinary action was taken against him. The petitioner's

attendance to the duties, indicates that after issuance of

charge sheet and even before issuance of the charge sheet,

he was not regular to duties. Being a badli filler and an

under ground employee he was expected to put in minimum

190 musters per year. But he failed to do so. For the

absenteeism of the petitioner during the year 2002 he was

issued with a charge sheet and a punishment of reversion

to a lower stage by reducing to Special Piece Rate Allowance

by 02 with effect from 1.10.2002 was imposed. Despite giving

opportunity petitioner failed to correct himself, which

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4109

compelled the respondent to dismiss him from service. Since

petitioner is being below ‘C’ grade 1st respondent is

empowered to impose the penalty of dismissal against him

and it does not require approval from higher authorities.

Petitioner neither disputed the enquiry proceeding nor

objected for the presentation of the pay sheet clerk during

the course of enquiry. He did not cross examine the

Management witnesses when opportunity was extended

to him. The enquiry officer duly considered the oral and

documentary evidence adduced on record and gave his

reasoned finding. Petitioner failed to show as to why these

findings are not valid. The contention that findings of the

Disciplinary Authority are outside the scope of the charge

is also not correct. If any of the employees of the respondent

company whose work is inter linked and inseparable

remained absent it will affect the production results. Thus,

if anyone remains absent without prior leave or without

any justified cause it prejudices the interests of the

respondent company as it creates sudden void which at

times is very difficult to fill up. There will be no proper

planning and the already planned schedules suddenly get

disturbed, if there is no prior notice. That is the reason the

why respondent company is compelled to take serious

action on the unauthorized absence. Petitioner has put in

033, 103, 003, and 043 and nil musters in 1999, 2001, 2002,

2004 and upto 31-7-2005 respectively when he was expected

to put in minimum 190 musters in a calendar year. As such,

respondent company was constrained to dismiss him from

service. In view of the binding legal precedents governing

this area also the respondent's action in this regard is

justifiable. Petition is liable to be dismissed.

5.

During the course of the present case proceedings,

for petitioner a memo has been filed conceding the validity

of domestic enquiry. Thereon the domestic enquiry has

been held to be valid by virtue ofthe order dated 5-2-2010.

6.

Ex.Wl and EX.Ml to M11 were marked with the

consent of the either party.

7.

Heard the arguments of either party.

8. The points for determination :

1.

Whether the respondent's action in issuing the

impugned order No.MMR/PER/D/072/4269 dated 7.8.2005

is legal and justified?

2.

To what relief he is entitled?

9. Point No (1) : As already observed above, the

petitioner conceded as to the validity of domestic enquiry

which lead to the order of this court holding that the said

domestic enquiry as valid. Thus, the voluminous pleading

on the part of the petitioner disputing with the correctness

of the procedure followed during the course of conducting

of the domestic enquiry and the alleged prejudice occurred

to him due to such alleged lapses, need not be considered.

When once petitioner concedes that the domestic enquiry

has been validly held, there is no need for reopening the

said matter.

10. Thus, the thing which remained to be considered

now on the pleadings of either party, is regarding, the

validity of the proceedings of the Disciplinary Authority

only. Accordingly, court heard either party, for the purpose

of Sec.11A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Thus, it is

to be verified whether the punishment awarded to the

petitioner by the Disciplinary Authority is proper, valid,

justifiable and in proportion to the charge alleged and

proved against him.

11. It is the contention of the petitioner that he could

not attend to the duties during the year 2003 regularly as

he suffered leg fracture accidentally during April, 2003 and

was under treatment from Area Hospital and also in private

hospitals. Apart from that he also prayed that he suffered

from some family problems. As to his sustaining leg fracture

and under going treatment in area hospital, is concerned

evidently, the respondents are not seriously disputing. It

is the contention of the respondents themselves that

considering the fracture injury sustained by the petitioner,

the sick period from 17.4.2003 to 17.6.2003 was not treated

as absenteeism and was not included in charge sheet. That

means, they are conscious of the fact that petitioner

sustained fracture injury to his leg and was under prolonged

treatment. Therefore, the contention of the petitioner that

he suffered fracture injury and was required prolonged

treatment is concerned it can be taken as an established

fact.

12. According to the Petitioner he was taking treatment

from private hospitals also. No doubt no documentary

evidence was produced to substantiate the same. But the

fact remains that a fracture injury requires a very prolonged

treatment and when a person suffers from a leg fracture, for

him to be able to walk normally even, he will be needing

substantial time. Thus, the absenteeism of the petitioner

which followed his accidentally sustaining leg fracture

injury is to be looked upon with due consideration.

13. As can be seen the from the material on record,

the enquiry report and other documents could not be served

on the petitioner personally, as he was not available and

after a publication was made in the news paper, he received

the same and has given an explanation stating that due to

fracture injury and consequent treatment in medical

hospitals he could not attend to the duty regularly and

promising that he would attend to duty regularly in future

if he is given an opportunity. The Disciplinary Authority

found that the said explanation is not satisfactory and

further accepting the fmdings of the enquiry officer and

taking that there are no extenuating circumstances to take

a lenient view in the matter, dismissed the petitioner from

services with effect from 18-8-2005 by virtue of the order

dated 7-8-2005 i.e., the impugned order.

14. As can be seen from the order of the Disciplinary

Authority referred to above, the Disciplinary Authority

has considered only the misconduct alleged in the charge

sheet dated 29-12-2004 basing on which the enquiry has

4110

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

been held against the petitioner for his unauthorized

absence during the year 2003. Whereas respondents have

pleaded about the various events of unauthorized absence

on the part of the petitioner, which never formed part of the

impugned disciplinary proceedings.

15. In the counter filed by the respondents a plea is

put forth regarding the previous misconduct and awarding

of punishment for the same to the petitioner. But no

supporting documents were filed to prove the same. Further

more, there is no reference of any such punishment in the

above referred order of the Disciplinary Authority.

16. No opportunity has been given to the petitioner

regarding the aggravated form of punishment, by assigning

reasons for the same either, as his previous conduct which

lead to imposition of earlier punishment or any such

analogous aspects. Thus there has been no opportunity

for the petitioner to verify the correctness of the reasons

which lead to the aggravated form of the punishment

imposed against him at any time prior to imposition of the

same and to state his pleas regarding punishment to be

imposed. Only in the counter filed before this court,

respondents pleaded about the previous conduct of the

petitioner, for the first time. Thus, it can not be taken as a

justified conduct on the part of the respondents.

17. When the documents produced on record are

considered one can reasonably understand that

considering the absenteeism of the petitioner during the

year 2003 alone, he has been dismissed from service in

spite of the fact that during the said year he suffered leg

fracture and has under gone prolonged medical treatment.

As per standing orders 25.25 ofthe respondent company,

only when there is a habitual absence from duty that too

without sufficient cause, it amounts to misconduct which

attracts punishment. In the present case, there is prolonged

absence from duty on the part of the petitioner. But it can

not be said that it is totally without sufficient cause. During

that period he suffered fracture to his leg accidentally and

under gone prolonged medical treatment. But, the fact

remains that he failed to intimate the concerned authorities,

regarding his inability to attend to the duties. It can not be

said that he was not in a position to pass on such

information. His conduct, in remaining absent from duty

without intimation and permission from the concerned

authorities, certainly would have resulted into substantial

prejudice to the interests of the respondent. Thus,

petitioner is certainly liable for punishment but in the given

circumstances, it shall not be dismissal from service.

18. The Standing Orders of the respondent company

spell out several punishments for the misconducts. The

last and gravest punishment provided for, is dismissal from

service. Thus, only for the persons who are incorrigible in

all respects, such is the punishment to be awarded, but not

to the case like petitioner, who could make out some

plausible reason for his remaining absent from duties during

the year 2003. But, as it can not be said that his conduct is

beyond re- proof altogether owing to the fact that he failed

to take prior permission/sanction of leave appropriate

punishment is to be imposed against him.

19. In view of the fore gone discussion, it can safely

be concluded that the punishment of dismissal of the

petitioner from service by virtue of impugned order dated

7-8-2005 passed by the 1st respondent is not maintainable.

But, as the conduct of the petitioner in remaining absent

from duty for long duration without intimation/sanction of

leave which would certainly resulted into prejudice to the

interests of the respondent company, appropriate

alternative punishment is to be imposed,by way of

modifying the punishment of dismissal from service imposed

againust him. On due consideration of the nature of the

misconduct for which the punishment is awarded and the

circumstances which the lead the Petitioner to commit such

misconduct, one can see that the reasonable punishment

to be awarded is stoppage of one increment with cumulative

effect only.

This point is answered accordingly.

20. In the result, petition is allowed. The impugned

order dated 7-8-2005 where under first respondent imposed

the punishment, dismissing the petitioner from the services

ofthe respondent company w.e.f. 18-8-2005 is hereby set

aside. Instead, the petitioner is awarded with the punishment

of stoppage of one increment with cumulative effect.

Petitioner shall be reinstated into service with immediate

effect, but he shall not be entitled for any back wages. He

is entitled for all other attendant benefits.

Award passed accordingly. Transmit.

Dictated to Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant

transcribed by her corrected by me on this the 22nd day of

May, 2013.

M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined

Witnesses examined for the

for the Petitioner

Respondent

NIL

NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

Ex. Wl: Dismissal order dated 7-8-2005

Documents marked for the Respondent

EX. Ml: Office copy of charge sheet dt. 29-l2-2004

EX. M2: Explanation of the Petitioner to the charge sheet.

EX. M3: Office copy of enquiry notice dt.18-l-2005

EX. M4: Enquiry proceedings dt.22-l-2005

EX. M5: Enquiry report dt. 2l-2-2005

EX. M6: Office copy of lr. No.MMR/PER/D/072/2130

dt.17-4-2005

EX. M7: Undelivered cover with ack. for EX.M6

dt.30-4-2005

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4111

EX. M8: News paper notification in Andhra Jyothi daily

dt.5-7-2005

EX. M9: Acknowledgement dt.11-7-2005 for lr. No.MMR/

PER/D/ 072/2130 dt.17-4-2005

EX.Ml 0: Representation of the Petitioner.

EX. M11 : Dismissal order dated 7-8-2005.

ubZ fnYyh] 2 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1547-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ ,l- lh-

lh- ,y- ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds

chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 70@2007)

dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 02&07&2013 dks

izkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹iQk- la- ,y& 22013@1@2013&vkbZ vkj(lh&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 2nd July, 2013

S.O. 1547.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947 ), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central

Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,

Hyderabad (70/2007) as shown in the Annexure, in the

industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of SCCL and their workmen, received by the

Central Government on 02-07-2013

[ F. No. L-22013/1/2013-IR(C-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT

AT HYDERABAD

PRESENT : Smt. M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI Presiding Officer

Dated the 29th day of May, 2013

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L. C. NO. 70/2007

Between :

Sri Rentala Murali,

S/o Kamel,

C/o Smt. A. Sarojana, Advocate,

Flat No. G7, Ground Floor,

Rajeshwari Gayatri Sadan,

Opp: Badruka Jr. College for Girls,

Kachiguda, Hyderabad.

.....Petitioner

AND

1. The General Manager,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

Sreerampur(Projects) Area,

Sreerampur, Adilabad District.

2. The Colliery Manager/Superintendent of Mines,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

1K 1A Incline, Sreeramput Area.

Adilabad district

. .. ..Respondents

APPEARANCES :

For the Petitioner:

M/s. A. Sarojana & K. Vasudeva

Reddy, Aavocates

For the Respondent:

Sri M.V. Hanumanata Rao,

Advocate

AWARD

This is a petition under Sec.2 A (2) of the I.D. Act,

1947 filed by the petitioner who worked as coal filler at IK

incline of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Limited

invoking seeking for declaring the impugned order

No.SRP(P)/P(IR)/35A/2K/938 dated 30-5-2000 issued by

first respondent as illegal and arbitrary and set aside the

same consequently directing the respondent to reinstate

the petitioner into

2. The averments made in the petition in brief are as follows:

Petitioner was appointed as badli filler on 11-4-1987

and confirmed as coal filler. He has been regular to his

duties till the year 1996. During the year 1997, as he suffered

with typhoid fever for which respondent company put him

in sick list from 20-8-1987 to 30-9-97 and also as his daughter

suffered ill health during that year which required him to

take her to various hospitals and also her being expired

unfortunately, petitioner was compelled not to be regular

to his duties. A charge sheet dated 30.-3-1998 was issued

alleging that petitioner was irregular to his duties during

the year 1997 which amounts to misconduct under

company’s Standing Orders No.25.25. He submitted his

explanation on 4-4-1998 giving the reasons for his inability

for attending the duties during the year 1997. Without

considering merits of his submissions enquiry was

conducted with a predetermined notion. During the enquiry

he was not given any opportunity much less valid in nature.

Basing on such lopsided enquiry, enquiry officer held the

charges as proved. Basing on such erroneous findings

Disciplinary Authority issued show cause notice dated

25-9-1998. Petitioner submitted his reply on 3-10-1998.

Without considering merits of the same he was dismissed

from service, vide the order dated 30-5-2000. The whole

enquiry was conducted in a routine and mechanical manner

with pre-determined intention to dismiss the petitioner from

service. First respondent failed to apply his mind

independently while passing the impugned order. Before

commencement of the enquiry, the enquiry procedure was

not explained to the petitioner and he was not offered the

assistance of the defence assistant. As he was not aware

of the enquiry procedure petitioner could not participate in

the enquiry effectively. Though the petitioner has shown

all the prescriptions and records which can substantiate

his defence regarding his ill-health and the ill-health of his

daughter, none of them were marked by the enquiry

officer and the enquiry officer ignored the submissions

4112

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

made by the petitioner at the end of the enquiry on the

pretext that petitioner could not substantiate his claim

with relevant proofs. It all happened due to improper

conduct of the enquiry and petitioner suffered great

prejudice. Approval of competent authority was not

obtained prior to passing the impugned order. No

opportunity was given to the petitioner to produce the

witnesses. Neither the findings of the enquiry officer nor

the impugned order does give any reasons much less valid

in nature. The enquiry officer and Disciplinary Authority

proceeded with misconceived notion that petitioner

admitted his guilt. The enquiry was not held in the language

known to the petitioner. Petitioner was not supplied with

any documents on which the enquiry officer placed his

reliance. Even the said documents do not establish guilt

of the petitioner. Subsequent to the issuance of the

impugned order, Management of M/s. Singareni Collieries

Company Limited conducted interviews for the workmen

who were dismissed from service on account of

absenteeism. In response petitioner also applied for the

same and attended the interview. He pleaded that as a result

of his dismissal from service, he and his family members

are facing hardships and starvation. He also assured the

Management that he would be regular to his duties, if he

is given re-appointment. But he was not given

re-appointment. He is the sole bread winner of his family

consisting of aged mother, wife and two children. Since

he was dismissed from service, his whole family rendered

without any livelihood. Punishment of dismissal from

service is too harsh, excessive and disproportionate to

the charges alleged. Petitioner’s inability to be regular to

his duties during the year 1997 was only on account of

his and his daughter’s ill health and family troubles but

not otherwise. On account of his financial stringencies

he could not approach the court earlier. With great

difficulty present petition is filed. Delay occurred due to

that reason only.

3. Resoondent's filed a counter with averments in

brief as follows:

Petitioner approached the court directly without

complying with the mandatory pre-requisite of the

conciliation. There are delay and latches on the part of

the petitioner in approaching the court. For these reasons

petition ought to have been dismissed in limini.

Petitioner’s contention that he suffered with typhoid fever

in the year 1997 is not correct. He is to be put to strict

proof that in the year 1997 his daughter also suffered ill-

health and he was to take her to various hospitals. No

single document is filed to prove all these contentions.

Since the explanation of the petitioner dated 4.4.98 to

the charge sheet issued to him was not satisfactory, the

enquiry was held. During the enquiry petitioner was given

full and fair opportunity basing on the enquiry, the enquiry

officer held the charges as proved. Thereafter, show cause

notice dated 25-9-98 was issued to the petitioner. For it

petitioner submitted his reply on 3-10-1998. Thereafter

on duly considering the merits of the submissions made

by the petitioner impugned order was passed. During the

enquiry petitioner did not file even a single document to

prove the ill health of himself and his daughter. Petitioner

attended the counseling on 27-8-1999 and assured the

Management in wiring that hence forth he would work

regularly but, even after the counseling he did not improve

his attendance, he was quite irregular to his duties. The

enquiry was conducted following the principles of natural

justice. Petitioner fully participated in it. The enquiry

procedure was duly explained to him. Petitioner has been

given sufficient opportunity to produce his witnesses after

explaining the procedure of the enquiry. Impugned order

is a well reasoned order. Petitioner expressed that he got

no objection to conduct the proceedings in English. All

the documents which were relied upon during the enquiry

were shown to the petitioner. Petitioner does not come

within the guide lines of reinstatement of the workmen

who were dismissed from service. Hence, he was not

reinstated. Punishment of dismissal from service is

neither harsh nor excessive nor disproportionate to the

charges leveled in this case as per the settled law. First

respondent is competent to issue the impugned order

without approval of any other authority. Petitioner is to

be put to strict proof that on account of his financial

stringencies he could not file the petition earlier. Petition

is liable to be dismissed.

4. During course of the present case proceedings

petitioner got filed a memo conceding the validity of

domestic enquiry held by the respondent company. There

on by virtue of the order dated 29-1-2009 this court held

the domestic enquiry held by the respondent is to be

treated as valid.

5. Both the parties were heard u/s 11 A of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. EX.Wl and EX.Ml to M8

were marked with the consent of either parties.

6. The pointes raised for determination are :

1. Whether the impugned order No. dated is liable

to be set aside, if so on what grounds?

2. Whether the petitioner is entitled to any relief?

3. To what relief?

7. Point (1) : It is an admitted fact that Petitioner

absented himself from duty during the period mentioned

in the charge sheet leveled against him. Ex.Ml is the charge

sheet dated 30-3-1998, Ex.M2 is the representation given

by the Petitioner in answer to Ex.Ml charge sheet,

whereunder he categorically admitted regarding his

absence from duty during the given period but he explained

the reasons for his absence stating that during the year

1997 due to extreme unavoidable circumstances like his

five years old daughter becoming seriously ill and

hospitalized and after prolonged treatment her being

expired on 7-1-1998. He said that the said child was

admitted in the Area hospital, Bellampally and there itself

she died and that as he was looking after his ailing child,

who was so seriously ill, he could not attend to his duties

regularly and further due to the mental shock suffered by

him on account of demise of his child he himself suffered

illness and was under medical treatment. He further stated

that due to the distance which he was to cover to attend to

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4113

his duties after attending his ailing child at Bellampally

hospital, he was unable to attend duties regularly. He

categorically pleaded in Ex.M2 that the absence from duty

on his part, was never intentional and that it was due to the

circumstances mentioned above and promised that he

would more carefully attend to his duties in future.

8. Inspite of the above referred representation made

by the Petitioner, respondents have not got satisfied and a

regular departmental enquiry was conducted against the

Petitioner. Petitioner participated in the said enquiry, as

can be seen from the Ex.M4 and M5 the enquiry report and

enquiry proceedings respectively. As can be seen from

Ex.M5 even during the enquiry, Petitioner admitted the

factum of his being absent from duty on the dates

mentioned in the charge sheet and gave an explanation

that owning to the sickness of himself and his child and

also due to the demise of his child, he could not attend

duties regularly at that time. When he made the statement

before the enquiry officer he was not subjected to any

cross examination with this regard, which means that truth

of these contentions is not being disputed with.

9. Thus, it is very much clear that owing to the sickness

of himself as well as his daughter and also demise of his

daughter who was so sick, Petitioner could not attend to

the duties regularly on the dates mentioned in Ex.MI charge

sheet. He reasonably explained in Ex.M2 that as he was

attending to his ailing child who was under going treatment

in Area Hospital, Bellampally and to attend to his duties

from Bellampally he was to cover considerable distance

and due to that reason also he could not attend to the

duties at the relevant time. Inspite of all these reasons

which were explained by the Petitioner and which were not

being disputed with, the enquiry officer has given a finding

in Ex. M4 report that Petitioner has been guilty of

misconduct of habitual absence without sufficient reason.

As can be seen from the contents of Ex.M4 the enquiry

officer was conscious of the fact that during the relevant

time Petitioner's daughter was seriously ailing and she

expired after prolonged treatment. Inspite of it, and

stressing on the fact that Petitioner pleaded guilty of his

being absent from duties, the learned enquiry officer gave

the finding that the guilt of the Petitioner for the charge

levelled against him is proved. But the fact remains that

there is sufficient and reasonable cause for the Petitioner

not being able to attend to the duties at the relevant time. It

can not be said that without there being any sufficient

cause Petitioner absented himself from duty.

10. Inspite of it, the Disciplinary Authority evidently

accepted the findings of the enquiry officer in total and

proceeded further in the matter. Ex.M8 is the final order

passed by the Disciplinary Authority. As can be seen from

this document, a copy of said enquiry report was supplied

to the Petitioner calling for his representation if any,

regarding the findings contained in the enquiry report and

in answer to the same Petitioner made representation dated

3.10.1998. The said representation is not filed before this

court. As per Ex.M8, 'Disciplinary Authority found the

contents of the said representation are not satisfactory

but he did not give any reasons for his arriving at the such

decision. He did not discuss the contents of the said

representation in Ex.M8 order. He awarded the punishment

of dismissal from service with immediate effect to the

Petitioner, by virtue of Ex.M8 order.

11. There are several other punishments provided

for, for the misconduct committed by the workmen of

the respondent company in Standing Orders Clause No.

26 of the respondent company. Dismissal from service is

the gravest punishment provided for. Therefore such

punishment can be awarded only in extreme cases where

gravest misconduct is alleged and proved. In the present

case, Petitioner, for sufficient reason and under the

extreme circumstances discussed above, could not attend

to the duties regularly at the relevant time, which resulted

into his being absent from duties on various dates

mentioned in Ex.M1 charge sheet. The record does not

disclose that Petitioner was habitual absentee from duties

and disciplinary action was taken against his for any such

previous misconduct. That means this is the first and only

disciplinary action taken against the Petitioner and as a

result of this disciplinary action itself Petitioner has been

removed from service. Why the various circumstances

explained by the Petitioner, as reasons for his inability to

attend the duties at the relevant time, were not acceptable

as sufficient cause for his absence from duties, either to

the enquiry officer or to the Disciplinary Authority, is

not explained any where on record. Both these officials

ignored the said explanation totally. Whereas, the

explanation given by the Petitioner is a sufficient cause

for any body to be absent from duties. Sickness of self

and serious sickness of his child which required his

attendance and which ultimately resulted into her demise

are certainly sufficient causes for a workman being absent

from duties.

12. Learned Counsel for the respondents relied upon

the principles laid down in the cases of State of UP and

others Vs. Ashok Kumar Singh and another reported in

1996(1) SCC 302 and North Eastern Karnataka Road

Transport Corporation,. Vs. Ashappa. In support of his

contention that absence from duty for a long time is

misconduct of such nature which does not deserve

leniency and which warrants the punishment of dismissal

from service. As can be seen from both these cases, the

workmen thereto have shown negligence and

disinterestedness towards duties by being absent from

duties long time without there being sufficient cause.

Whereas in the present case Petitioner could give

reasonable and sufficient causes for his absenteeism, as

already discussed above. Therefore, the principles laid

down in the above said legal precedents can not be made

applicable to the facts of the present case.

13. Learned Counsel for the respondent further

contended that Petitioner failed to produce death

certificate pertaining to his child and also failed to

produce any medical record to substantiate his

contentions. But the fact remains as already discussed

above, that when he made a statement during the enquiry

to the effect that owing to the sickness and consequential

4114

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

demise of his child and also his own sickness, he could not

attend to the duties, he was not at all been subjected to

any cross examination, which amounts to the

Management's acceptance to the truth of his contentions.

14. In view of the fore gone discussion of the

material on record, it can safely be held that Petitioner is

not guilty of the charge under Standing Orders 25.25, thus,

the order of dismissal from service passed against him

by virtue of Ex.M8 order is liable to be set aside.

This point is answered accordingly.

15. Point No. (II) :

In view of the finding given in point No.(I) above,

Petitioner is entitled for the relief of setting aside the

impugned order, i.e., Ex.M8 order and he is entitled for

reinstatement into service.

16. But the fact remains that Petitioner has not

applied for any leave and has not intimated the concerned

authorities about his inability to attend the duties before

absenting himself from duties. It certainly would have

caused inconvenience and hardship to the respondent

company. For the period of his absence he would not have

been paid any wages. That itself is not sufficient to remedy

the inconvenience suffered by the respondent.

17. Considering the circumstances, though

Petitioner will have to be ordered to be reinstated into

service, as far as back wages are concerned, he will be

entitled for 25% of the wages to which he would have

been entitled to, if he has been continued in service only.

He is entitled for continuity of service and all other

attendant benefits. This point is answered accordingly.

Result :

18. Point No. 3: In the result petition is allowed.

The impugned order passed by the first respondent

No.SRP(P)/P(IR)/35. A/2K/938 dated 30-5-2000

dismissing the Petitioner from service is declared as

illegal and arbitrary and is hereby set aside. Petitioner

shall be reinstated in service forth with. He shall be

entitled for 25% of the back wages for the period from

the date of his dismissal from service till the date of

publication of this order in official gazette. There after

he is entitled for full wages. Respondent shall pay the

wages accordingly. Petitioner is entitled for continuity

of service and all other attendant benefits.

Award passed accordingly. Transmit.

Dictated to Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant

transcribed by her corrected by me on this the 29th day

of May, 2013.

M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined

Witnesses examined

for the Petitioner

for the Respondent

NIL

NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

Ex. Wl: Dismissal order dated 30-5-2000

Documents marked for the Respondent

Ex. M1: Charge sheet dated 30-3-1998

Ex. M2: Petitioner's explanation dated 4-4-1998

Ex. M3: Enquiry Notice to Petitioner dt.20-8-1998

Ex. M4: Enquiry report dt.19-9-98

Ex. M5: Enquiry proceeding dt. 29-8-98

Ex. M6: Notice dt. 25-9-98

Ex. M7: Representation of Petitioner 27-8-99

Ex. M8: Final Settlement notice dt.30-5-2000

ubZ fnYyh] 2 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1548-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ ,l- lh-

lh- ,y- ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds

chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV (la[;k 18@2012)

dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 02&07&2013 dks

izkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹iQk- la- ,y& 22013@1@2013&vkbZ vkj(lh&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 2nd July, 2013

S.O. 1548.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central

Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,

Hyderabad (18/2012) as shown in the Annexure, in the

industrial dispute between the employers in relation to

the management of SCCL and their workmen, which was

received by the Central Government on 02-07-2013

[ F. No. L-22013/1/2013-IR(C-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR

COURT AT HYDERABAD

PRESENT : Smt. M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer

Dated the 17th day of May, 2013

Industrial Dispute L. C. No. 18/2012

Between :

Sri Md. Gouse Moinuddin,

S/o M.A. Jabbar,

C/o Smt. A. Sarojana,

Advocate, Flat No.G-7, Ground floor,

Rajeshwari Gayatri Sadan,

Opp. Badruka Junior College for Girls,

Kachiguda,

Hyderabad

..............Petitioner

AND

1.

The General Manager,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

Srirampur, Adilabad District.

2.

The Superintendent of Mines,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

SSRP 3 & 3A incline, Srirampur,

Adilabad district

. . . .Respondents

APPEARANCES:

For the Petitioner:

M/s. A. Sarojana & K. Vasudeva

Reddy, Advocates

For the Respondent:

None

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4115

A WARD

This is a petition filed under Sec.2 A (2) of the I D.

Act, 1947 between the management of M/s. Singareni

Collieries Company Ltd., and their workman Sri Md. Gouse

Moinuddin and numbered in this Court as L.C.No. 18/2012

and notices were issued to the parties.

2. Petitioner has filed this petition against his

dismissal from service by the Respondent vide order

No.SRP/PER/13.008/893 dated 5-3-2010, without following

the procedure and seeking for reinstatement with all

consequential benefits.

3. Case stands posted for filing of counter and

documents by Respondents.

4. At this stage, Petitioner has filed IA 58/2013 for

advancement of main case from 18-5-2013 to 7-5-2013 and

filed a memo seeking for permission to withdraw his case.

6. In pursuance of the order in IA No.58/2013 dated

7-5-2013, this case is advanced to 7-5-2013. In the memo

filed by the Petitioner seeking for permission to withdraw

the petition, Petitioner pleaded that the management was

kind enough to offer employment to him subject to

withdrawal of the present dispute and that he be permitted

to withdraw the present dispute.

7. Notice given to Respondent. Heard both parties.

Petitioner is permitted to withdraw his case.

8. In the result, the case is dismissed as withdrawn.

Award is passed accordingly Transmit.

Dictated to Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant

transcribed by her and corrected by me on this the 7th day

of May, 2013.

M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined

Witnesses examined

for the Petitioner

for the Respondent

NIL

NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

ubZ fnYyh] 2 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1549-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ ,l- lh-

lh- ,y- ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds

chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 41@2010)

dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 02&07&2013 dks

izkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹iQk- la- ,y& 22013@1@2013&vkbZ vkj(lh&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 2nd July, 2013

S.O. 1549.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central

Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,

Hyderabad (41/2010) as shown in the Annexure in the

industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of SCCL and their workmen, which was

received by the Central Government on 02-07-2013.

[ F. No. L-22013/1/2013-IR(C-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR

COURT AT HYDERABAD

PRESENT : Smt. M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer

Dated the 7th day of May, 2013

Industrial Dispute L. C. No. 41/2010

Between :

Sri Anney Blessington,

S/o Sampath Kumar

C/o Smt. A. Sarojana,

Advocate, Flat No.G7, Rajeshwari Gayatri Sadan,

Opp. Badruka Jr. College for Girls,

Kachiguda, Hyderabad.

. . ..Petitioner

AND

1.

The General Manager,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

Ramagundam Area-I, Ramagundam.

Karimnagar District.

2.

The Colliery Manager/Superintendent of

Mines,

M/s Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

GDK-2 & 2A incline,

Karimnagar District.

.. . .Respondents

APPEARANCES:

F or the Petitioner:

M/s. A. Sarojana

& K. Vasudeva Reddy,

Advocates

For the Respondent:

M/s. P.A.V.V.S. Sarma &

Vijayalaxmi Panguluri,

Advocates

A W ARD

This is a petition filed by the Petitioner Sri Anne

Blessington under Sec.2 A (2) of the I.D. Act, 1947 against

the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

and numbered in this Court as L.C.I.D.No. 41/2010 and

notices were issued to the parties.

2. Petitioner has filed this petition against his

dismissal from service vide order No.RG.I/PER/S/46/6944

dated 24-l1-2008 by the Respondent, without allowing

the procedure, seeking for reinstatement with all

consequential benefits. Respondent have filed counter

statement as well as documents in support of their

contentions.

3. Case stood posted for arguments on the validity

of domestic enquiry. At this stage, the matter has been

referred to Lok Adalath for amicable settlement.

4116

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

4. While things stood so, Petitioner has filed memo

seeking for permission to withdraw his case pleading that

the management was kind enough to offer employment to

him subject to withdrawal of the present dispute and that

he be permitted to withdraw his case. In the given

circumstances, the matter has been called to the regular

file from Lok Adalath.

5. Notice given to Respondents. Heard both parties.

Petitioner is permitted to withdraw his case.

6. In the result, the case is dismissed as withdrawn.

Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.

Dictated to Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant

transcribed by her and corrected by me on this the 7th day

of May, 2013.

M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses

Witnesses examined

for the Petitioner

for the Respondent

NIL

NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

ubZ fnYyh] 2 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1550-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ ,l- lh-

lh- ,y- ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds

chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 39@2009)

dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 02&07&2013 dks

izkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹iQk- la- ,y& 22013@1@2013&vkbZ vkj(lh&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 2nd July, 2013

S.O. 1550.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central

Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,

Hyderabad (39/2009) as shown in the Annexure, in the

industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of SCCL and their workmen which was

received by the Central Government on 02-07-2013

[ F. No. L-22013/1/2013-IR(C-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR

COURT AT HYDERABAD

PRESENT : Smt. M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer

Dated the 15th day of April, 2013

Industrial Dispute L. C. No. 39/2009

Between :

Sri Neelam Srinivas S/o Neelam Venkatrajam,

C/o Smt. A. Sarojana, Advocate, Flat No.G7,

Rajeshwari Gayatri Sadan, Opp. Badruka

Jr. College for Girls,

Kachiguda, Hyderabad

..Petitioner

AND

1.

The General Manager,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

Ramaguandam Area-IV, Ramagundam,

Karimnagar district.

2.

The Colliery Manager,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

OCP-II, Godavarikhani,

Karimnagar district

. .. ..Respondents

APPEARANCES:

For the Petitioner:

M/s. A. Sarojana, K. Vasudeva

Reddy & P. Basavaiah,

Advocates

For the Respondent:

Sri M. V. Hanumantha Rao,

Advocate

AWARD

This is a petition filed by the Petitioner Sri Neelam

Srinivas under Sec.2 A (2) of the I.D. Act, 1947 against the

management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

and numbered in this Court as L.C.I.D.No. 39/2009 and

notices were issued to the parties.

2. Petitioner has filed this petition against his

dismissal from service vide order No. RG4/PER/IR/049/708

dated 20/21-6-2004 by the Respondent without following

the procedure seeking for reinstatement with all

consequential benefits.

3. Case stands posted for arguments under Sec. l1(A)

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

4. At this stage, Petitioner has filed memo seeking for

permission to withdraw his case pleading that the

management was kind enough to offer employment to him

subject to withdrawal of the present dispute and that

he -be permitted to withdraw his case.

5. Notice given to Respondents. Heard both parties.

Petitioner is permitted to withdraw his case.

6. In the result, the case is dismissed as withdrawn.

Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.

Dictated to Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant

transcribed by her and corrected by me on this the 15th

day of April, 2013.

M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined

Witnesses examined

for the Petitioner for the Respondent

NIL

`

NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4117

ubZ fnYyh] 2 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1551-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ

,l lh lh ,y ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa

ds chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k

94@2007) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 2&7&2013

dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹iQk- la- ,y&22013@1@2013&vkbZ vkj (lh&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 2nd July, 2013

S.O. 1551.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award of the Central

Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,

Hyderabad (Reference No. 94/2007) as shown in the

Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers

in relation to the management of SCCL and their workmen,

which was received by the Central Government on

2-7-2013.

[ F. No. L- 22013/1/2013-IR (C-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT

AT HYDERABAD

Present : Smt. M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer

Dated the 26th day of April, 2013

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L. C. No. 94/2007

Between :

Sri Chuttakula Shyam Sunder,

S/o Venkata Rajam,

C/o Smt. A. Sarojana,

Advocate, Flat No. G7,

Rajeshwari Gayatri Sadan,

Opp. Badruka Jr. College for Girls,

Kachiguda, Hyderabad. ......Petitioner

AND

1. The General Manager,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

KK-5 incline, Mandamarri Area, Mandamarri,

Adilabad District.

2. The Colliery Manager/Superintendent of Mines,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

KK-5 incline, Mandamarri Area, Mandamarri,

Adilabad District.

.....Respondents

Appearances :

For the Petitioner :

M/s. A. Sarojana, K. Vasudeva

Reddy and P. Basavaiah,

Advocates.

For the Respodent :

Sri S.M. Subhani, Advocate.

AWARD

This is a petition filed by the Petitioner Sri Chuttakula

Shyam Kumar, under Sec. 2 A (2) of the I.D. Act, 1947

against the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries

Company Ltd., and numbered in this Court as L.C. I.D. No.

94/2007 and notices were issued to the parties.

2. Petitioner has filed this petition against his

dismissal from service vide order No. K5/2001/5/1464 dated

27/29-3-2001 by the Respondent without following the

procedure seeking for reinstatement with all consequential

benefits. Respondents have filed counter statement as

well as documents in support of their contentions. On filing

of memo conceding domestic enquiry as valid by the

Petitioner, Departmental enquiry held legal and valid.

3. Case stands posted for arguments under Sec. 11(A)

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

4. At this stage, Petitioner has filed memo seeking

for permission to withdraw his case pleading that the

management was kind enough to offer employment to

him subject to withdrawal of the present dispute and that

he be permitted to withdraw his case.

5. Notice given to Respondents. Heard both parties.

Petitioner is permitted to withdraw his case.

6. In the result, the case is dismissed as

withdrawn. Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.

Dictated to Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant

transcribed by her and corrected by me on this the 26th

day of April, 2013.

M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined

Witnesses examined for

for the Petitioner

the Respondent

NIL

NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

ubZ fnYyh] 2 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1552-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ

,l lh lh ,y ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa

ds chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj

4118

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SHRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k

84@2012) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 2&7&2013

dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹iQk- la- ,y&22013@1@2013&vkbZ vkj (lh&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 2nd July, 2013

S.O. 1552.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award of the Central

Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,

Hyderabad (Reference No. 84/2012) as shown in the

Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers

in relation to the management of SCCL and their workmen,

which was received by the Central Government on 2-7-2013.

[ F. No. L- 22013/1/2013-IR (C-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT

AT HYDERABAD

Present : Smt. M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer,

Dated the 27th day of April, 2013

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 84/2012

Between :

The President (Sri R. Kashi Ramulu),

Telengana Trade Union Council,

H. No. 3-5-247/3, Azmathpura,

Karimnagar.

......Petitioner

AND

The General Manager,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

Mandamarri Area, Mandamarri,

Adilabad District-504231 .....Respondent

Appearances :

For the Petitioner :

M/s. A. Sarojana and K. Vasudeva

Reddy, Advocates.

For the Respondent :

NIL

AWARD

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its

order No. L-22012/156/2012-IR (CM-II) dated 7-11-2012

referred the following dispute under section 10(1)(d) of

the I.D. Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal between

the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

and their workmen. The reference is :

SCHEDULE

‘‘Whether the action of the General Manager,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Mandamarri

Area, Mandamarri, Adilabad District, in terminating

the service of Shri Kolipaka Anjaiah, Ex-Badli Filler,

KK-2 inc., SCCL, Mandamarri Area with effect from

27-2-2001 is justified or not? To what relief he

applicant is entitled for?”

The reference is numbered in this Tribunal as I.D.

No. 84/2012 and notices were issued to the parties.

2. Notices were issued to both parties and the same

were reported served. For Petitioner union Sri. K. Vasudeva

Reddy, Advocate and for Respondent Sri P.A.V.V.S. Sarma

have offered to file vakalat by th next date of hearing.

3. The case stands posted for appearance of parties

to 5-8-2013. While things stood so, Sri K. Vasudeva Reddy,

Advocate filed Vakalat for the Petitioner together with

petition i. e. IA No. 74/2013 invoking Sec. 36(4) of Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 seeking permission to appear for the

Petitioner. Further he filed I.A. No. 84/2013, seeking for

advancement of the case to 27-5-2013 and filed a memo

seeking for permission to withdraw the case. In the given

circumstances, IA No. 74/2013 and IA No. 84/2013 are

allowed. Sri K. Vasudeva Reddy, Advocate is permitted to

represent the Petitioner.

4. In pursuance of the order in IA No. 84/2013 dated

27-5-2013, this case is advanced to 27-5-2013. In the memo

filed by the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner, seeking for

permission to withdraw the petition, Petitioner pleaded that

the management was kind enough to offer employment to

him subject to withdrawal of the present dispute and that

he is to be permitted to withdraw the petition.

5. Notice given to Respondents. Heard both parties.

Workman Sri Kolipaka Anjaiah is permitted to withdraw his

case.

6. In the result, the case is dismissed as withdrawn.

Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.

Dictated to Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant

transcribed by her and corrected by me on this the 27th

day of May, 2013.

M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined

Witnesses examined for

for the Petitioner

the Respondent

NIL

NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

ubZ fnYyh] 2 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk-1553-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk

14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ ,l lh lh ,y

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4119

ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 16@2008)

dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 2&7&2013 dks çkIr

gqvk Fkk A

¹iQk- la- ,y&22013@1@2013&vkbZ vkj (lh&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 2nd July, 2013

S.O. 1553.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award of the Central

Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,

Hyderabad (Reference No. 16/2008) as shown in the

Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers

in relation to the management of SCCL and their workmen,

which was received by the Central Government on 2-7-2013.

[ F. No. L- 22013/1/2013-IR (C-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT

AT HYDERABAD

Present : SMT. M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI,

Presiding Officer,

Dated the 27th day of May, 2013

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L. C. No. 16/2008

Between :

Sri Lingam Shankaraiah,

S/o Lingaiah,

C/o Smt. A. Sarojana,

Advocate, Flat No. G7,

Opp. Badruka Jr. College for Girls,

Kachiguda, Hyderabad. ......Petitioner

AND

1. The General Manager,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

Mandamarri area, Mandamarri,

Adilabad District.

2. The Colliery Manager, KK-5A incline,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

Mandamarri Area, Mandamarri,

Adilabad District.

.....Respondents

Appearances :

For the Petitioner :

M/s. A. Sarojana, K. Vasudeva

Reddy and P. Basavaiah,

Advocates.

For the Respondent :

Sri S.M. Subhani, Advocate.

AWARD

This is a petition filed by the Petitioner Sri Lingam

Shankaraiah under Sec. 2 A (2) of the I.D. Act, 1947 against

the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company

Ltd., and numbered in this Court as L.C. I.D. No. 16/2008

and notices were issued to the parties.

2. Petitioner has filed this petition against his

dismissal from service vide order No. P/MM/7/2/01/2334

dated 20-5-2001 by the Respondent without following the

procedure, seeking for reinstatement with all consequential

benefits. Respondents have filed counter statement as well

as documents in support of their contentions. On filing of

memo conceding domestic enquiry as valid by the

Petitioner, Departmental enquiry held legal and valid.

3. Case stands posted for arguments under Sec. 11(A)

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. At this stage, the matter

has been referred to Lok Adalath for amicable settlement.

4. While things stood so, Petitioner has filed memo

seeking for permission to withdraw his case pleading that

the management was kind enough to offer employment to

him subject to withdrawal of the present dispute and that

he be permitted to withdraw his case. In the given

circumstances, the matter has been called to the regualr file

from Lok Adalath.

5. Notice given to Respondents. Heard both parties.

Petitioner is permitted to withdraw his case.

6. In the result, the case is dismissed as

withdrawn.

Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.

Dictated to Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant

transcribed by her and corrected by me on this the 27th

day of May, 2013.

M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined

Witnesses examined for

for the Petitioner

the Respondent

NIL

NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

ubZ fnYyh] 2 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1554-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ ,l lh

lh ,y ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds

chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 98@2009)

4120

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SHRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 2&7&2013 dks çkIr

gqvk Fkk A

¹iQk- la- ,y&22013@1@2013&vkbZ vkj (lh&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 2nd July, 2013

S.O. 1554.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award of the Central

Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,

Hyderabad (Reference No. 98/2009) as shown in the

Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers

in relation to the management of SCCL and their workmen,

which was received by the Central Government on 2-7-2013.

[ F. No. L- 22013/1/2013-IR (C-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT

AT HYDERABAD

Present : SMT. M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI,

Presiding Officer,

Dated the 7th day of May, 2013

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L. C. No. 98/2009

Between :

Sri I. Ravi Shankar,

S/o I. Rayamallu,

C/o Smt. A.Sarojana,

Advocate, Flat No. G-7, Ground Floor,

Rajeshwari Gayatri Sadan,

Opp. Badruka Junior College for Girls,

Kachiguda, Hyderabad. ......Petitioner

AND

1. The General Manager,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

Mandamarri Area,

Mandamarri, Adilabad District.

2. The Superintendent of Mines,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

SMG-3 Incline, Mandamarri Area,

Mandamarri, Adilabad District.

.....Respondents

Appearances :

For the Petitioner :

M/s. A. Sarojana and K. Vasudeva

Reddy, Advocates

For the Respondent :

Sri M.V. Hanumantha Rao,

Advocate.

AWARD

This is a petition filed under Sec. 2A (2) of the I.D.

Act, 1947 between the management of M/s. Singareni

Collieries Company Ltd., and their workman Sri I. Ravi

Shankar and numbered in this Court as I.C. No. 98/2009

and notices were issued to the parties.

2. Petitioner has filed this petition against his

dismissal from service by the Respondent vide order No.

P/MM/7/2/00/1681 dated 16-4-2000 without following the

procedure seeking for reinstatement with all consequential

benefits.

3. Respondent have filed counter statement.

4. Both parties have filed their respective documents

and case stands posted for arguments on validity of

domestic enquiry by Respondents.

5. At this stage, Petitioner has filed IA 56/2013 for

advancement of main case from 1-7-2013 to 7-5-2013 and

filed a memo seeking for permission to withdraw his case.

6. In pursuance of the order in IA No. 56/2013 dated

7-5-2013, this case is advanced to 7-5-2013. In the memo

filed by the Petitioner seeking for permission to withdraw

the petition, Petitioner pleaded that the management was

kind enough to offer employment to him subject to

withdrawal of the present dispute and that he be permitted

to withdraw the present dispute.

7. Notice given to Respondent. Heard both parties.

Petitioner is permitted to withdraw his case.

8. In the result, the case is dismissed as withdrawn.

Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.

Dictated to Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant

transcribed by her and corrected by me on this the 7th day

of May, 2013.

M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined

Witnesses examined for

for the Petitioner

the Respondent

NIL

NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

ubZ fnYyh] 2 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1555-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ ,l lh

lh ,y ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds

chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 1@2007)

dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 2&7&2013 dks çkIr

gqvk Fkk A

¹iQk- la- ,y&22013@1@2013&vkbZ vkj (lh&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4121

New Delhi, the 2nd July, 2013

S.O. 1555.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central

Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,

Hyderabad (1/2007) as shown in the Annexure in the

Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to

the management of SCCL and their workmen, which was

received by the Central Government on 2-7-2013.

[ F. No. L- 22013/1/2013-IR (C-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT

AT HYDERABAD

Present : Smt. M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer

Dated the 4th day of April, 2013

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L. C. No. 1/2007

Between :

Sri T. Krishna Murthy,

S/o T.V. Narasiah,

C/o Smt. A.Sarojana, Advocate,

Flat No. G-7, Ground floor,

Rajeshwari Gayatri Sadan,

Opp. Badruka Jr. College for Girls,

Kachiguda, Hyderabad. ......Petitioner

AND

1. The General Manager,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

Sreerampur Area, Sreerampur,

Adilabad District.

2. The Dy. General Manager,

RK-7, incline, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

Sreerampur Area, Sreerampur,

Adilabad District.

.....Respondents

Appearances :

For the Petitioner :

M/s. A. Sarojana, & K. Vasudeva

Reddy, Advocates.

For the Respondent :

M/s. P.A.V.V.S. Sarma & Vijaya

Laxmi Panguluri, Advocates.

AWARD

Sri T. Krishna Murthy, who woked as badli filler at

RK.-7 incline, Ramakrishnapur in the Respondent company

(who will hereinafter be referred to as workman) has filed

this petition against the Respondents seeking for declaring

the proceeding No. SRP/PER/13.008/3530 dated 19-7-2004

issued by the Respondent No. 1 as illegal, arbitrary and to

set aside the same, consequently directing the 2nd

Respondent i.e., The Dy. General Manager M/s. Singareni

Collieries Company Ltd., RK-7 incline, to reinstate the

Petitioner into service, duly granting all the consequential

benefits such as continuity of service, back wages and all

other attendent benefits etc., and such other reliefs as

this court may deems fit.

2. The averments made in the petition in brief are as

follows :

The Petitioner was appointed as badli filler on

15-5-2000 in first Respondent company on compassionate

grounds and was posted to work in the office of 2nd

Respondent. On 10-1-2003 a charge sheet was served on

him alleging that he was absent from duty without

sanctioned leave or sufficient cause, which amount to

misconduct under the company’s Standing Order No. 25.25.

The Petitioner has submitted explanation on 23-4-2004

explaining the reasons for his inability to perform duties

during the said period. Without considering the same on

merits an enquiry was conducted with a pre-determined

notion. During that enquiry Petitioner was not given any

opportunity. Basing on such lop-sided enquiry, the Enquiry

Officer held the charges as proved. Basing on such

erroneous findings, the workman was dismissed from

service, vide office order dated 19-7-2004. The workman

has categorically prayed in his reply to the charge sheet as

well as during the course of enquiry that due to ill-health

and family problems he could not attend to the duties. He

also prayed that he will attend duty without absence in

future but, his submissions were not considered. The order

dated 19-7-2004 is wholly illegal, arbitrary and violative of

principles of natural justice. The workman was not explained

as to the procedure of the enquiry. He was not offered the

assistance of any defence assistant. The Enquiry Officer

and Disciplinary Authority proceeded with pre conceived

notion as if the workman has accepted the charges alleged

against him, which is factually incorrect. Neither of them

has considered the submission of the workman before

arriving at a conclusion. The enquiry was conducted in

the language not known to the workman and it was not

explained to him in the language known to him. Having

drafted the proceedings in English, the signatures of the

workman were obtained. As per the instructions issued by

the Respondent No.1 company the proceedings of the

enquiry are to be conducted in the language known to the

delinquent employee. The Enquiry Officer relied upon the

evidence of the irrelevant witnesses who have no personal

knowledge of the charge alleged against the Petitioner.

Though enquiry officer relied upon several documents to

substantiate the charges, none of those documents either

shown or furnished to the Petitioner either before or during

the course of enquiry. Even the documents marked do not

establish the charge alleged against him. The enquiry was

conducted in a routine and mechanical manner with a

predetermined intention to somehow or the other, put the

Petitioner to extreme hardship of dismissal from service.

First Respondent has not applied his mind independently

while issuing the impugned order of dismissal. Before

4122

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SHRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

issuing the said order, approval of competent authority

was not obtained. No opportunity was given to the

workman to produce his witness. Neither the findings of

the Enquiry Officer nor the interim order contained any

reasons much less valid in nature. Further more, the

punishment awarded is excessive and disproportionate to

the charges alleged against him. The workman was

appointed in the year 2000 on compassionate grounds. He

is not highly literate and he is not aware of the procedural

aspects and as such absenteeism occurred for some days

during the year 2002. If the court comes to a conclusion

that findings of the Enquiry Officer and Respondent No.1

are correct even then the workman craves indulgence of

the court to modify the punishment to that of lesser

punishment under Sec.11A of the Industrial Disputes Act,

1947 to enable the workman survive himself and also feed

his family members.

3. The Respondents filed his counter statement with

averments in brief as follows :

As far as coal mines are concerned appropriate

Government is Central Government. The proper procedure

to entertain any industrial dispute is after the failure of

conciliation which has not been done in the instant case.

Straight away the Petitioner has approached this Tribunal

and filed petition under Sec.2 A(2) of Industrial Disputes

Act, 1947 which is a state amendment is not applicable to

the Respondent company as the appropriate Government

is Central Government to which the State Amendment is

not applicable. The workman herein is an unauthorized

habitual absentee appointed as badli filler on 15-8-2000

and was working at RK.7 incline of Srirampur Area. He was

irregular in attending to his duties. He had put in 78 musters

in the year 2000 and 72 musters in the year 2001. He put in

only 43 musters in the year 2002. Hence, he was issued

with charge sheet dated 10-1-2003 for his habitual absence

from duty without justified cause for the year 2002 which

constitutes misconduct of under company's Standing

Orders No.25.25. The workman submitted his explanation

to the said charge sheet. As it was found to be

unsatisfactory, enquiry was ordered. The workman has

attended the said enquiry and fully participated in it. The

Enquiry Officer has explained the workman regarding the

procedure of the enquiry in the language known to the

Petitioner. When he was given option to have any assistant

in the enquiry, he declined to have such assistance. Two

witnesses were examined on behalf of the management

and workman himself deposed on his behalf. The enquiry

was conducted following the principles of natural justice.

The workman was asked whether he wants to cross examine

the management witnesses he declined to do so. Petitioner

in his deposition stated that due to ill-health he could not

attend to his duty regularly in the year 2002 and admitted

that he was absent to duty. Further, he stated that he has

taken treatment in private hospital for ill-health but he has

not produced any documentary proof. After conclusion of

the enquiry a report was submitted. Notice was issued to

the workman on 19-12-2003 along with copy of enquiry

report calling for his comments on the findings of the

Enquiry Officer. He has submitted his representation,

considering the same and also the enquiry report, the

Disciplinary Authority opined that it is not a case to take

lenient view and decided to terminate the services of the

workman. Accordingly, he was dismissed from service by

virtue of the proceeding dated 19-7-2004. The contention

of the Petitioner that before issuing the impugned order of

dismissal, without considering the merits of his submissions,

the enquiry was conducted and disciplinary action was

taken is all incorrect. His further contention that with pre-

conceived notion the enquiry was conducted in a routine

and mechanical manner is also incorrect. Petition is filed

after lapse of three years since the date of impugned order

and therefore, it is liable to be dismissed on the ground of

delay and latches.

4. A memo has been filed by the Petitioner stating

that he does not want to challenge the validity of

domestic enquiry and in the light of the said memo this

Tribunal has held that the domestic enquiry conducted by

the Respondent is valid. Since, the validity of domestic

enquiry has not been challenged by the workman, there is

no need for going into merits and demerits of the said

enquiry. Even, the evidence adduced on record need not

be re-appraised except for the limited purpose of verifying

whether the punishment awarded to the workman by the

Respondent No.1 is in proportion to the charges levelled

and established against him.

5. Heard the arguments of either party under Sec.11A

of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Written arguments filed

by either party and the same are considered.

6. Points that arise for determination are:

(1) Whether the punishment awarded to the

workman by virtue of impugned proceeding No.

SRP/PER/13.008/3530 dated 19-7-2004 is

disproportionate to the charges alleged and

established against the workman?

(2) Whether the workman is entitled for relief of

reinstatement into services and consequential

benefits?

7. Point No. (l) : As per the record, by virtue of

proceeding No.SRP/PER/13.008/3530 dated 19-7-2004, the

final order has been passed by the first Respondent,

dismissing the workman from service w.e.f. 19-7-2004. As

can be seen from this proceeding, the enquiry report

together with enquiry proceeding and also the

representation of the workman dated 23-4-2004, all have

been examined by the Disciplinary Authority and he

found the representation of the workman not satisfactory.

Further, since the charges levelled and proved against the

workman being serious, he found fit the punishment of

dismissal from service. It is further stated in this proceeding

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4123

that the Disciplinary Authority has gone through the

workman's past record and found that there are no

extenuating circumstances to take a lenient view.

8. Whereas as can be seen from the charge sheet

alleged against the workman, the allegations are that, in

total Petitioner has absented himself from duty for 156 days

in different spells during the year 2002 and it has been

gathered that the Petitioner has been habitually late to

duty or habitually absent from duty without sufficient

cause. For this, the workman has given explanation stating

that due to ill-health and family circumstances he could

not attend the duty regularly. He further stated that since

his health as well as family circumstances were set right, he

will attend the duties regularly. Having not accepted the

said explanation, the Departmental Enquiry was conducted.

During this enquiry also the workman has categorically

deposed while examining himself as defence witness, that

he absented from duty without leave or permission from

January, 2002 to September, 2002 due to ill-health.While he

was under cross examination, he was asked whether he

informed about the family planning operation of his wife to

SOM, RK-7 incline. For that, he answered that he has not

intimated. Further when he was questioned, as to, where

he took treatment for his ill-health, he said that he took

treatment in a private hospital and that he can not produce

any evidence in support of the said version.

9. From the above evidence on record and the various

explanations given by the workman, it can be seen that the

workman has admittedly absented himself from duty during

the year 2002 for substantial period and he has given

reasons for the said absence as family problems like his

wife undergoing family planning operation and his ill-health.

But the fact remains that he has not obtained any leave or

permission from his superiors before availing the leave.

But he categorically pleaded, time and again, that if an

opportunity has been given to him, he will attend to the

duties regularly and mend his ways.

10. This is the first enquiry conducted against

Petitioner, as can be seen from the record. If there is

mention of any other past record of absenteeism, such as

Petitioner has been habitually absent from duties previously

which lead to the cause of action to launch enquiry and

awarding any punishment previously, the action of the

Respondent dismissing the Petitioner from service, stands

justified. But, this is the very first Departmental enquiry

conducted against the workman whereas the gravest

punishment provided in the Standing Orders i.e., removal

of service is awarded to him, inspite of his repeated requests

that he will mend his ways and attend his duties regularly

if an opportunity is accorded to him.

11. Considering the above discussed circumstances,

and since, this is the first event of misconduct committed

by the Petitioner, for it, the gravest punishment provided

for, can not be taken as a proper punishment, especially

since he is pleading that he will be very regular in attending

duty in future if opportunity is accorded to him, it can

safely be concluded that the punishment awarded is

disproportionate to the charges levelled and proved against

the workman. Further more, the aggravating circumstances

if any which lead the Disciplinary Authority towards such

a gravest punishment are not mentioned in the impugned

proceeding dated 19-7-2004.

12. Considering the above discussion and material

on record, it can safely be concluded that the punishment

awarded to the Petitioner is disproportionate to the charges

levelled and proved against him and therefore it is to be

modified appropriately.

13. Point No. (II) : Consequent to the finding in point

No.(I), the Petitioner is entitled for reinstatement into

service, but as the misconduct is proved against him, proper

sentence is to be find out in the place of the removal from

service, which is found to be grossly disproportionate to

charges levelled and proved against him. Standing Order

No.26 of the Respondent company provides for eight modes

of punishment for misconduct. They are:-

(a) Warning, reprimand, censure.

(b) Fine

(c) Suspension without wages for a period not

exceeding ten days

(d) Stoppage of increment without cumulative effect

(e) Stoppage of increment with cumulative effect

(f) Reversion to a lower stage or a lower grade in a

time scale

(g) Removal/discharge from service

(h) Dismissal from service.

Stoppage of one increment without cumulative effect

provided in Standing Orders No. 26 Clause (d) is the proper

punishment for the charge alleged and proved against the

Petitioner workman, as it is the first event of misconduct

on his part. In view of the fore gone discussion and material

on record the Point No.(I) is answered accordingly.

14. In view of the fore gone discussion it can safely

be held that punishment awarded to the workman is to be

modified as follows: In the place of punishment of dismissal

from service awarded to the workman by virtue of the

proceedings No.SRP/PER/13.008/3530 dated 19-7-2004 he

is to be awarded the punishment of stoppage of one

increment without cumulative effect. Thus, he is to be

ordered to be reinstated into service with immediate effect.

But as far as back wages are concerned as he has not

worked for the Respondent, he can not be asked to be paid

the full wages. But, considering the fact that he was unable

to attend the duties due to the impugned order of the

Respondent company, but not voluntarily, he is entitled

for compensation of atleast 25% of his wages from the date

of his dismissal from service till the date of his reinstatement

4124

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SHRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

which shall be not later than one month from the date of

publication of the award. If there is any delay in

reinstatement, one month after the publication of award,

due to the inaction on the part of the Respondents, the

Petitioner will be entitled to be paid the full wages by the

Respondent. The Respondents are liable to pay full wages

to the Petitioner workman for the period of said delay also.

This point is answered accordingly.

Result :

15. In the result, the petition is allowed. The impugned

proceeding No.SRP/PER/13.008/3530 dated 19-7-2004, as

far as award of punishment is concerned, is hereby modified

from dismissal of service to stoppage of one increment

without cumulative effect. The Petitioner shall be reinstated

into service within one month after the date of publication

of this award. He is entitled for back wages @25% of his

regular wages, for the period from the date of his dismissal

from service till the date of his reinstatement. If he is not

reinstated into service, within the stipulated time of one

month after the publication of the award, he is entitled for

full wages from the date of'expiry of one month from the

date of publication of award.

Award passed accordingly. Transmit.

Dictated to Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant

transcribed by her corrected by me on this the 4th day of

April, 2013.

M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner NIL

Witnesses examined for the Respondent NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

ubZ fnYyh] 2 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1556-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ ,l lh

lh ,y ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds

chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 11@2006)

dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 2&7&2013 dks çkIr

gqvk Fkk A

¹iQk- la- ,y&22013@1@2013&vkbZ vkj (lh&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 2nd July, 2013

S.O. 1556.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 11/2006)

of the Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,

Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial

Dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of SCCL and their workmen, which was

received by the Central Government on 2-7-2013.

[ F. No. L- 22013/1/2013-IR (C-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT

AT HYDERABAD

Present : Smt. M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer

Dated the 26th day of April, 2013

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L.C.No. 11/2006

Between:

Sri Janagam Shankaraiah,

S/o Ellaiah,

C/o Smt. A. Sarojana,

Advocate, Flat No.G7, Rajeshwari Gayatri Sadan,

Opp. Badruka Jr. College for Girls,

Kachiguda, Hyderabad. ... . . .Petitioner

AND

1. The General Manager,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

RG-I Area, Godavarikhani,

Karimnagar District.

2.The Colliery Manager/Superintendent of Mines,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

GDK-2 incline, Godavarikhani,

Karimnagar District. . . . .Respondents

Appearances :

For the Petitioner : Sri. K. Vasudeva Reddy, Advocate

For the Respondent : Sri M. Shankar Narayan, Advocate

AWARD

This is a petition filed by the Petitioner Sri Janagam

Shankaraiah, under Sec.2 A (2) of the I.D. Act, 1947 against

the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company

Ltd., and numbered in this Court as L.C.I.D.No. 11/2006

and notices were issued to the parties.

2. Petitioner has filed this petition against his

dismissal from service vide order No. P.RG.I/32A/5465 dated

6-9-2001 by the Respondent without following the

procedure, seeking for reinstatement with all consequential

benefits. Respondents have filed counter statement as well

as documents in support of their contentions. On filing of

memo conceding domestic enquiry as valid by the

Petitioner, departmental enquiry held legal and valid.

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4125

3.

Case stood posted for arguments under Sec.

l1(A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. At this stage,

the matter has been referred to Lok Adalath for amicable

settlement.

4. While things stood so, Petitioner has filed memo

seeking for permission to withdraw his case pleading that

the management was kind enough to offer employment to

him subject to withdrawal of the present dispute and that

he be permitted to withdraw his case. In the given

circumstances, the matter has been called to the regular file

from Lok Adalath.

5. Notice given to Respondents. Heard both parties.

Petitioner is permitted to withdraw his case.

6. In the result, the case is dismissed as withdrawn.

Award is passed accordingly.

Transmit.

Dictated to Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant

transcribed by her and corrected by me on this the 26th

day of April, 2013.

M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner NIL

Witnesses examined for the Respondent NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

ubZ fnYyh] 2 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1557-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ ,llhlh,y

ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 41@2009)

çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 02@07@2013 dks çkIr

gqvk Fkk A

¹iQk- la- ,y&22013@1@2013&vkbZ vkj (lh&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 2nd July, 2013

S.O. 1557.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award of Central Govt.

Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Hyderabad (41/2009)

as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between

the employers in relation to the management of SCCL and

their workman, which was received by the Central

Government on 02-07-2013.

[ F. No. L-22013/1/2013-IR (C-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT

AT HYDERABAD

Present :

Smt. M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer

Dated the 27th day of May, 2013

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L.C. NO. 41/2009

Between :

Sri Shamsher Ali,

S/o Shabbir Ali,

C/o Smt. A. Sarojana,

Advocate, Flat No. G 7,

Opp. Badruka Jr. College for Girls,

Kachiguda, Hyderabad.

...Petitioner

AND

1.

The General Manager,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

Ramagundram Area, Ramagundam,

Karimnagar District.

2.

The Colliery Manager,

M/s Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

GDK-1 Incline, Godavarikhani,

Karimnagar Dist.

.....Respondents

Appearances :

For the Petitioner :

M/s. A. Sarojana & K. Vasudeva

Reddy, Advocate.

For the Respondent :

Sri S.M. Subhani, Advocate.

AWARD

1.

This is a petition filed by the Petitioner Sri

Shamsher Ali under Sec. 2 A (2) of the I.D. Act, 1947 against

the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

and numbered in this Court as L.C.I.D. No. 41/2009 and

notices were issued to the parties.

2. Petitioner has filed this petition against his

dismissal from service vide order No. RG.I/PER/S/46/08

dated 2.1.2005 by the Respondent without following the

procedure seeking for reinstatement with all consequential

benefits. Respondents have filed counter statement as well

as documents in support of their contentions.

3. Case stands posted for arguments on the point of

validity of domestic enquiry. At this stage, the matter has

been referred to Lok Adalath for amicable settlement.

4126

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SHRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

4. While things stood so, Petitioner has filed memo

seeking for permission to withdraw his case pleading that

the management was kind enough to offer employment to

him subject to withdrawal of the present dispute and that

he be permitted to withdraw his case. In the given

circumstances, the matter has been called to the regular file

from Lok Adalath.

5. Notice given to Respondents. Heard both parties.

Petitoner is permitted to withdraw his case.

6. In the result, the case is dismissed as withdrawn.

Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.

Dictated to Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant

transcribed by her and corrected by me on this the 27th

day of May, 2013.

M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the

Witnesses examined

Petitioner

for the Respondent

NIL

NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

ubZ fnYyh] 2 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1558-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ ,llhlh,y

ds çca/ra=k ds laca¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 46@2008)

çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 02@07@2013 dks çkIr

gqvk Fkk A

¹iQk- la- ,y&22013@1@2013&vkbZ vkj (lh&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 2nd July, 2013

S.O. 1558.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award of Central Govt.

Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Hyderabad (46/2008)

as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between

the employers in relation to the management of SCCL and

their workman, which was received by the Central

Government on 02-07-2013.

[ F. No. L-22013/1/2013-IR (C-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT

AT HYDERABAD

Present :

Smt. M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer

Dated the 26th day of April, 2013

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L.C. NO. 46/2008

Between :

Sri Embadi Ramesh,

S/o Narayana,

C/o Smt. A. Sarojana,

Advocate, Flat No. G 7,

Opp. Badruka Jr. College for Girls,

Kachiguda, Hyderabad.

...Petitioner

AND

1.

The General Manager,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

Bellampalli Division, Bellampally,

Adilabad District.

2.

The Superintendent of Mines,

M/s Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

Goleti-1 incline, Bellampally Division,

Bellampally, Adilabad Dist.

.....Respondents

Appearances :

For the Petitioner :

M/s. A. Sarojana & K. Vasudeva

Reddy, Advocates.

For the Respondent :

Sri M.V. Hanumantha Rao,

Advocate.

AWARD

1.

This is a petition filed by the Petitioner Sri Embadi

Ramesh under Sec. 2 A (2) of the I.D. Act, 1947 against the

management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

and numbered in this Court as L.C.I.D. No. 46/2008 and

notices were issued to the parties.

2. Petitioner has filed this petition against his

dismissal from service vide order No. P.BPA/129/2964 dated

14.9.2000 by the Respondent without following the

procedure seeking for reinstatement with all consequential

benefits. Respondents have filed counter statement as well

as documents in support of their contentions. On filing of

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4127

memo conceding domestic enquiry as vild by the Petitioner,

departmental enquiry held legal and valid.

3. Case stands posted for arguments under Sec. 11(A)

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

4. At this stage, Petitioner has filed memo seeking

for permission to withdraw his case pleading that the

management was kind enough to offer employment to him

subject to withdrawal of the present dispute and that he be

permitted to withdraw his case.

5. Notice given to Respondents. Heard both parties.

Petitoner is permitted to withdraw his case.

6. In the result, the case is dismissed as withdrawn.

Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.

Dictated to Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant

transcribed by her and corrected by me on this the 26th

day of April, 2013.

M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the

Witnesses examined

Petitioner

for the Respondent

NIL

NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

ubZ fnYyh] 3 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1559-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ Hkkjrh;

thou chek fuxe gSnjkckn ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj

muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds

iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 60@2011) çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh;

ljdkj dks 02@07@2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹iQk- la- ,y&17011@9@2010&vkbZ vkj (,e)º

tksgu rksiuks] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 3rd July, 2013

S.O. 1559.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the common Award (Ref.

No. 60/2011) of the Central Government Industrial

Tribunal/Labour Court, Hyderabad now as shown in the

Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers

in relation to the management of Life Insurance

Corporation of India, Hyderabad, and their workman,

which was received by the Central Government on

02-07-2013.

[ F. No. L- 17011/9/2010-IR (M)]

JOHAN TOPNO, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT

AT HYDERABAD

Present :

Smt. M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer

Dated the 29th day of May, 2013

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L.C. NO. 60/2011

Between :

Sri A.V. Sagar,

S.R. No. 670001, S1,

Sapthagiri Enclave,

Rajeshwarinagar,

Kakinada-533003.

...Petitioner

AND

1.

The Regional Manager (P & IR),

Life Insurance Corporation of India,

South Central Zonal Office,

Jeevan Bhagya, Saifabad,

Hyderabad-500063.

2.

The Managar (P & IR),

DM LIC of India, Divisional Office,

Jeevan Godavari, Morampudi.

.....Respondents

Appearances :

For the Petitioner :

M/s. L. Sripal Reddy, Advocates.

For the Respondent :

Sri K.R.L. Sarma, Advocate.

AWARD

1.

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour

by its order No. L-17011/9/2010-IR(M) dated 5.10.2011

referred the following dispute under Section 10(1)(d) of the

I.D. Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal between the

management of Life Insurance Corporation of India and

their workman. The reference is,

SCHEDULE

‘‘Whether the action of the management of Life

Insurance Corporation of India, Rajahmundry imposing the

punishment of dismissal and recovery of Rs. 9,14,896 on

4128

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SHRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Shri A. Vidya Sagar is justified? What relief the concerned

workman is entitled to?’’

The reference is numbered in this Tribunal as I.D.

No. 60/2011 and notices were issued to the parties

concerned.

2. The case stands posted for filing of claim statement

and documents. Petitioner called absent and there is no

representation since long time. Inspite of giving fair

opportunity, claim statement was not filed by the Petitioner

and the matter is coming up since the year 2011. In the

circumstances, taking that Petitioner is not interested in

the proceedings, petition is dismissed.

Award passed accordingly. Transmit.

Dictated to Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant

transcribed by her and corrected by me on this the 29th

day of May, 2013.

M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the

Witnesses examined

Petitioner

for the Respondent

NIL

NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

ubZ fnYyh] 3 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1560-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj vflLVsUV

lqifjuVsaMsUV vkjdyksftLV] Xokfy;j ds çca/ra=k ds laca¼ fu;kstdksa

vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds

iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k lh-th-vkbZ-Vh-@,y-lh-@vkj-@274@97) dks

çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 28&6&2013 dks çkIr

gqvk Fkk A

¹iQk- la- ,y&42012@42@1997&vkbZ vkj (Mh;w)º

tksgu rksiuks] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 3rd July, 2013

S.O. 1560.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGIT/

LC/R/274/97) of the Central Government Industrial

Tribunal-Cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the

Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers

in relation to the management of The Asstt.

Superintendent Archaeologist, Gwalior and their workman

which was received by the Central Government on

28-6-2013.

[ F. No. L- 42012/42/1997-IR (DU)]

JOHAN TOPNO, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

JABALPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/R/274/97

PRESIDING OFFICER: SHRI R.B.P A TLE

Shri Raghavendra Singh Bhadoriya,

C/o B.S.Jadon Ki Chakki ke Pass

Mohalla Jaganpura, Laghedi Dagar,

Gwalior

........Workman

Versus

Asstt. Supdt. Archaeologist,

Archaeological Survey of India,

Archaeological Museum Gwalior Fort,

Gwalior

........Management

AWARD

Passed on this 10th day of April, 2013

1. As per letter dated 25-9-97 by the Government of

India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is

received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under

Section-10 of I.D. Act, 1947 as per Notification No. L-42012/

42/97/IR(DU). The dispute under reference relates to :

" Whether the action of the management of Asstt.

Supdt. Archaeological Survey of India in terminating

Shri Raghavendra Singh Bhadoriya w.e.f. 4-12-96 is

justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled

for ?"

2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to

the parties. 1st party submitted his statement of claim at

Page 2/1 to 2/5. The case of 1st party workman is that he

was appointed on daily wages on 25-5-94. He was assigned

duty of watchman to watch and warn section of

Archaeological Museum, Gwalior Fort, Gwalior. He was

allowed to work till 7th June 1996. No appointment order

was given to him as daily wagers were not given

appointment orders by the department. That certificate was

given to him on 8-1-96. That orally his services were

terminated on 9-1-96 in violation of Section 25-F of I.D.Act.

That one month's notice was not issued, notice pay was

not paid to him. Retrenchment compensation was not paid.

Reasons for termination were not communicated. He

submitted representation against termination but reply was

not given. Conciliation proceeding under Section 2-A of

I.D.Act initiated before ALC(C), Bhopal. The dispute has

been referred.

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4129

3. 1st party workman submits that he had completed

240 days continuous service preceding his termination.

That his termination is in violation of Section 25-H of

I.D.Act. That list of retrenched employee was not supplied

to him. Rule 77 of I. D. Act is violated. That juniors were

returned in service in violation of Section 25-G. He prays

for setting aside his termination with regularization in

service with back wages.

4. IInd party management filed Written statement at

Page 7/1 to 7/4. It is submitted by IInd party that 1st party

workman was not appointed to any post in accordance

with the rules. His appointment was on basis of need of

work as he was appointed as temporary employee on daily

wages. Certificate was obtained by 1st party. He was

designated as per seniority of casual labours. He was

disengaged for want of funds. 1st party workman had

undertaken to work again. That the dispute is not tenable

under I.D.Act. That IInd party Archaeological Museum is

not an industry under I.D.Act. That the discontinuation of

workman from 1-12-96 to 31-12-96 was justified as per rules.

Notices were served on 1st party for such break. Other

contentions of 1st party workman are denied. It is submitted

that one months advance notice was issued on 31-10-96.

The postal receipt is produced. However instead of waiting

for one month and reporting on duty on 1-01-97, the

conciliation proceedings were filed before ALC(C), Bhopal.

The material facts were suppressed by the 1st party. In

conciliation proceeding, 1st party insisted for permanent

post. Consequently the dispute has been referred. It is

emphasized that Archaeological Survey of India is not an

industry. That 1st party is not entitled to the reliefs prayed

by him.

5. 1st party filed rejoinder at Page 8/1 to 8/2. It is

contended that the objections raised in the Written

Statement by Ilnd party that 1st party was appointed as

temporary employee as per need of work is denied. He

submits that his termination from service is illegal for

violation of Section 25-F of I.D. Act.The settlement was

made during conciliation proceeding and 1st party was

reinstated on 22-7-96. However the terms of settlement were

not complied by management. His services were terminated

as per order dated 31-10-96. it is further submitted that Ilnd

party sale tickets to visitors for entry in museums charging

Rs.5 per ticket. That Ilnd party is an industry. The claim of

1st party be allowed for reinstatement with back wages.

6. The controversy between parties is whether the

Ilnd party is an Industry has been decided by the Hon'ble

High Court in W.P.No.2229/2000. The award was passed

after 1st party filed affidavit of evidence. He was not cross-

examined and Ilnd party has not adduced evidence. My

predecessor has passed award on 9-6-2003 holding that

Archaeological Survey of India is not and Industry and

legality of termination could not be decided. The matter

was reopened on 2-9-05 on application filed by 1st paprty

workman along with High Court order dated 24-8-05 in Writ

Petition No. 191/03. In the said Writ Petition, Hon'ble High

Court observed that in various cases, it has been held that

the Archaeological survey of India and the Museum is an

industry and the Industrial Dispute Act is applicable to the

said establishment. Appeal No. 3637/97 decided on 2-5-97

which has been followed by this court in W.P.No. 1495/04

decided on 23-2-05. The matter was remanded back to this

Tribunal for further decision. The award dated 9-6-03 was

quashed.

7. Considering pleadings on record, the points which

arise for my consideration and determination are as under.

My findings are recorded against each of them for the

reasons as below :-

(i) Whether the action of the

management of Asstt. Supdt.

In Negative

Archaeological

Survey

of India In terminating

Shri Raghavendra Singh

Bhadoriya w.e.f. 4-12-96 is

justified?

(ii) If so, to what relief the 1st party workman is

workman is entitled to?

entitled to reinstatement

with 50 % back wages.

REASONS

8. As discussed above, Hon'ble High Court has

decided controversy about industry and held that the IInd

party management Archaeological Survey of India is an

Industry. Therefore it is necessary to decide whether the

termination of services of 1st party is legal. After remand,

1st party workman has filed affidavit of his evidence on

23-5-06 at Page 27/1 to 27/3. He has stated on oath that he

was engaged on daily wages from 25-5-94. He was

discontinued from 8-1-96. In conciliation proceeding,

settlement was arrived between parties. He was reinstated

from 26-7-96. He was apprehending his discontinuation by

IInd party. Therefore he had written letter to ALC(C), Bhopal

dated 30-7-96. That IInd party had given letter dated

31-10-96 that his services would be discontinued from

1-12-96 to 31-12-96. However his services were orally

terminated from 4-12-96. That he was not paid retrenchment

compensation. He had completed 240 days service. His earlier

affidavit filed at Page 11/1 to 11/3 covers his entire contention

in his statement of claim that his services were terminated

and one Mr. Ravi had been appointed as class-IV employee

on daily wages. That termination of service is in violation of

Rule 77 of Industrial Rules. Despite of repeated opportunities

4130

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SHRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

given to the IInd party, 1st party workman was not cross-

examined and order sheet dated 2-6-03 shows that though

1st party workman was present for cross-examination, Shri

D.N. Jha, Asstt. Supdt. was present for IInd party. He

refused to cross-examine. He also declined to adduce any

evidence in support of the contention of the management.

Thus the evidence of 1st party remained unchallenged.

IInd party not filed affidavit of evidence after remand of

the matter. Despite repeated notices sent to IInd party from

2006, management failed to appear and cross-examine the

witness and right to cross-examination by management

was closed on 10-1-08. IInd party did not file any evidence

after remand of the matter. It is surprised to say that the

IInd party has not participated in the proceeding for reasons

not known. The certificate produced by 1st party at page

3/3 shows that workman was continuously working from

May 94 to 7-1-96 and thereafter as per settlement dated

22-7-96 till his oral termination on 4-12-96. The services of

1st party are terminated without paying retrenchment

compensation. without displaying list of employees

retrenched. As such IInd party management has committed

violation of Section 25-H & G of I.D.Act.

9. Learned counsel for 1st party Mr. Upendra Singh

in support of their claim relies on ratio held in case of Shri

Anoop Sharma Versus Executive Engineer, Public Health

Division No.1, Panipat (Haryana) reported in 2010(5)

Supreme Court Cases 497. Their Lordship held:-

‘‘Non-compliance of clause (a), (b) of Sec-25-F renders

retrenchment nullity-burden lies on employer to lead

tangible evidence as to compliance with clauses (a) and (b)

of Section 25-F. Services of appellant workman terminated

allegedly by offering compensation in lieu of notice period.

Compliance with Section 25-F pleaded on ground that

workman refused to receive compensation. Finding that

compensation was sent after about three months of

termination, Labour Court set aside termination for non-

compliance with Section 25-F High Court reversing award

in writ jurisdiction on ground that workman's initial

engagement was not legal.

Their Lordship held High Court erred in interfering

with award of Labour Court in absence of pleadings that

initial engagement/appointment was illegal and when it did

not find that the award was vitiated by apparent error of

law. The employer failed to prove compliance with clause

(a) and (b) of Section 25-Fdirecting reinstatement with back

wages.’’

In para-25 of the judgment their Lordship observed

that the judgment of the constitution bench in State of

Karnataka Versus Umadevi and other decisions in which

this Court considered the right of casual, daily wage,

temporary and adhoc employees to be regularized/

continued in service or paid salary in the regular timescale,

appears to have unduly influenced the High Court's

approach in dealing with the appellant's challenge to the

award of the Labour court. In our view, none of those

judgments has any bearing on the interpretation of Section

25-F of the Act and employer's obligation to comply with

the conditions enumerated in that section.’’

10. Shri Bhupendra singh arguing for 1st party relies

on ratio held in case of Harjinder Singh versus Punjab

State Warehousing Corporation in 2010(3) Supreme Court

Cases 192. Their Lordship dealing with Section 25-G of

I.D.Act held that-

"Principle of 1st come last go needs to prove

continuous service. Reiterated workman not required to

prove he had worked for 240 days during twelve calendar

months preceding termination, sufficient to plead and

prove that while effecting retrenchment employer violated

rule of "last come first go" without any tangible reason."

"Their Lordship restored award passed by labour

Court for reinstatement with 50 % back wages. Their

Lordship observed that there was no justification in

entertaining new pleading raised by the corporation of for

the first time before it regarding illegality of initial

appointment."

The ratio in both the cases squarely applied to

present case at hand. The services of workman were

terminated in violation of Section 25-F, no retrenchment

compensation was paid, one month notice was not issued,

list of retrenched employees was not displayed. The Junior

employee was retained in service. For above reasons, I

record my finding in Point No.1 is Negative.

11. Point No.2 arises to what relief the workman is

entitled. As per my finding in Point No.1, termination of

services of workman is in violation of Section 25-G & H of

the Act. The evidence of workman shows that he is

unemployed. His evidence is not clear how he is maintaining

his family without earning. Considering the facts of the

case that 1st party workman was terminated from service in

the year 1996, in my considered view, reinstatement of

workman with 50 % back wages would be appropriate as

held in 2010(3) Supreme Court Cases 192. Accordingly I

record my finding in Point No. 2.

12. In the result, award is passed as under:-

"(1) Action of the management of Asstt. Supdt.

Archaeological Survey of India in terminating Shri

Raghavendra Singh Bhadoriya w.e.f. 4-12-96 is illegal.

(2) IInd party is directed to reinstate 1st party

workman Shri Raghvendra Singh Bhadoria with

50 % back wages."

R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4131

ubZ fnYyh] 3 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk-1561-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj tujy eSustj]

vkfMusUl iQSDVjh ds çca/ra=k ds laca¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa

ds chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k

lhthvkbZVh@,ylh@vkj@116@96) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh;

ljdkj dks 28&6&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹iQk- la- ,y&14011@03@1995&vkbZ vkj (Mh;w)º

tksgu rksiuks] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 3rd July, 2013

S.O.1561.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Diputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGIT/

LC/R/116/96) of the Central Government Industrial

Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the

Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers

in relation to the management of The General Manager,

Ordnance Factory and Their workman which was received

by the Central Government on 28-6-2013

[ F. No. L- 14011/03/1995-IR(DU)]

JOHAN TOPNO, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM -LABOUR COURT,

JABALPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/R/116/96

SHRI R. B. P ATLE, Presiding Officer.

General Secretary,

Labour Union,

Ordnance Factory Khamaria,

Khamaria, Jabalpur

.....Workman/Union

Versus

General Manager,

Ordnance Factory,

Khamaria,

Jabalpur

.....Management

AWARD

Passed on this 3rd day of May, 2013

1. As per letter dated 24-4-96 by the Government of

India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is

received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under

Section -10 of ID Act, 1947 as per Notification No.L-14011/

3/95 IR(DU). The dispute under reference relates to:

“ Whether the reduction of pay scale of Ist party

workman Vikramaditya from Rs.1380 to Rs.1200 by

management of Ordnance Factory, Khamaria,

Jabalpur is legal? If not to what relief the workman is

entitled?”

2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to

the parties. Ist party workman submitted his statement of

claim at Page 11 to 17. The case of Ist party workman is

that charge sheet was issued to him under Rule 14 of CCS

Rules on the allegation for (i) threatening to ghao the

residence of Chairman/Secretary of NGO Association, (ii)

intimidation to employees (iii) participating on unauthorized

relay hunger strike (iv) Unauthorised use of loud speaker

etc. It is further contended that the workman denied the

charges against him under his reply dated 4-11-91. After

his reply, management revoked his suspension. He was

permitted to resume duties. In reply, the workman explained

the facts and circumstances of the alleged incident. He

had admitted that he being the activist of the Ordnance

Factory Labour Union, had made announcement in the

pandal requesting all the employees to participate in the

ongoing agitation called by the Union. The meeting held

demanding legitimate demands of the employees. He had

submitted that no disciplinary action was warranted as he

has only exercised his legitimate rights guaranteed under

the Constitution of India. The allegations against him were

not proved. There was no evidence before management to

hold charges proved against him. The punishment of

withholding pay scale is excessive, illegal. He submits that

order of punishment deserves to be set aside. The

application filed by him was dismissed without proper

consideration that the action of the management imposing

punishment without opportunity for his defence is illegal.

That Disciplinary Authority should have asked workman

for inspection of documents and cross-examination of the

witness of the management. The order of punishment is by

way of victimization as he supports grievances of the

employees being activist of the Union. On these ground,

workman prays for setting aside the order of reduction in

pay scale.

3. IInd party management filed Written Statement at

Page 21 to 24. It is submitted that the workman

unauthorisedly installed pandal and stated making

announcement to the effect that in case the NGO Staff did

not boycott the overtime on 7-9-91 as per the call given by

the union, a procession would be takenout from the said

pandal, the place selected for a Hunger Strike. The

procession was to proceed to the residence of the Secretary/

Chairman of the NGO’s Association where they would

demonstrate and gherao the said Secretary. It is submitted

that loudspeaker was used by the workman though not

permitted in the factory premises. The workman intimated

co-employees and participated in unauthorized relay

hunger strike on 7- 9-91. That charge sheet was issued to

the Ist party workman on 2-9-91. The details of the articles

of charges are given in para-3 of the Written Statement.

That in reply filed by workman, he submitted suspension

4132

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

should be revoked and a moderate and lenient view should

be taken in the matter. He did not wish have an enquiry

and if any misconduct was committed on his behalf, it was

done as Union Leader. He prayed for leniency.

4. Disciplinary Authority considering the reply of

workman come to the opinion that workman was guilty of

alleged misconduct, lenient view was taken and punishment

of reduction of pay from Rs.1380 per month to Rs.1200 was

imposed on 31-1-92. It is further pleaded that in case enquiry

is found violated, management retains right to prove

misconduct before Tribunal. IInd party prays for rejection

of the demand of the workman under reference.

5. My learned predecessor decided preliminary issue

and held that the enquiry is vitiated as per order dated

29-9-99. Management was permitted to prove misconduct

of the workman.

6. Considering pleadings on record, the points

which arise for my consideration and determination are as

under. My findings are recorded against each of them for

the reasons as below:-

(i)

Whether the misconduct alleged

In Nagative

against workman is proved ?

(ii) Whether the reduction of pay

In Nagative

scale of 1st party workman

Vikramaditya from Rs.1380 to

Rs.1200/- by management of

Ordnance Factory, Khamaria,

Jabalpur is legal ?

(iii) If so, to what relief the

The punishment

workman is entitled to?” .

of reduction of

pay of 1st party

workman as per

order dated

31-1-92 is set-

aside.

REASONS

7. The punishment of reduction in pay scale from

Rs.1380 to Rs.1200 is challenged. The enquiry is found

vitiated by my learned predecessor as per order dated

29-9-99. Though the IInd party management was permitted

to prove misconduct by adducing evidence, IInd party

has failed to adduce any evidence to prove the alleged

misconduct.

8. The evidence on affidavit was adduced by parties

only on the preliminary issue whether enquiry is fair and

properly conducted. The parties did not adduce any

evidence after the enquiry was found vitiated. Therefore I

record my finding on Issue No.1 in Negative.

9. Point No.2- As IInd party has failed to prove

misconduct, the action of IInd party in reduction of pay as

per order dated 31-1-92 cannot be sustained. It deserves

to be quashed and setaside. Accordingly I record my finding

on Point No.2.

10. Point No.3- In view of finding on Point No.1 & 2,

the order of punishment dated 31-1-92 imposed by

management of IInd party is illegal and cannot be sustained.

The order of punishment therefore deserves to be

quashed. Ist party workman is therefore entitled to the

relief prayed by him. Accordingly I record my finding on

Point No.3.

11. In the result, award is passed as under:-

(1)The action of IInd party management in imposing

punishment of reduction of pay scale from Rs.1380 to

Rs. 1200 as per order dated 31-1-92 is Illegal.

(2)The said order of punishment is set aside and

management of IInd party is directed to pay the

difference of emoluments to Ist party as the punishment

of reduction of pay scale vide order dated 31-1-92 is

set-aside.

The difference of amount of pay be paid to the Ist

party workman in 4 weeks. In case of default, the amount

shall carry interest at the rate of 9 % per annum from the

date of award till its realization.

12.Let the copies of the award be sent to the

Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment

as per rules.

R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 3 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk-1562-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj tujy eSustj]

vkfMusUl iQSDVjh ds çca/ra=k ds laca¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa

ds chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k

lhthvkbZVh@,ylh@vkj@190@93) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh;

ljdkj dks 28&6&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹iQk- la- ,y&14012@08@1992&vkbZ vkj (Mh;w)º

tksgu rksiuks] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 3rd July, 2013

S.O.1562.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Diputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGIT/

LC/R/190/93) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal

-cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure,

in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation

to the management of The General Manager, Ordnance

Factory and their workman which was received by the

Central Government on 28-6-2013.

[ F. No. L- 14012/08/1992-IR(DU)]

JOHAN TOPNO, Under Secy.

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4133

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM -LABOUR COURT,

JABALPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/R/190/93

SHRI R. B. PATLE, Presiding Offficer.

Shri Doodnath Singh,

President,

Ordnance Factory Khamaria Workers Union,

Khamaria, Jabalpur ....Workman/Union

Versus

General Manager,

Ordnance Factory, Khamaria,

Jabalpur .....Management

AWARD

Passed on this 18th day of March, 2013

1. As per letter dated 20-9-93 by the Government of

India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is

received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under

Section-10 of I.D. Act, 1947 as per Notification No. L-14012/

8/92-IR (DU). The dispute under reference relates to:

“Whether the action of the management of Ordnance

Factory, Khamaria, Jabalpur (MP) in imposing the

penalty of stoppage of annual increment for two

years on Shri Mahesh Prasad, T.No. S.O. 99/001329

vide their order dated 21-2-91 is justified? If not,

what relief he is entitled to?”

2. After notice, Ist party/workman failed to submit

statement of claim. Ist party is proceeded exparte on 16-2-

2006. IInd party submitted Written Statement at page 2/1

to 2/3. The claim of Ist party/workman is denied. It is

submitted on 9-8-90, from 22.00 hours to 07.00 hours, Ist

party workman was detailed on Durban duty but he was

absent from duty. At about 23.15 hours, about 30 to 35

persons alongwith one Ajay Charles had entered the

hospital in the factory and committed acts of violence.

Notice was issued to Ist party for absence/negligence in

duty as per Rule 16( 1) of Central Civil Service Rules. That

minor penalty withholding one increment was imposed for

misconduct committed by Ist party. That the Act of IInd

party is legal.

3. IInd party submitted affidavit of witness Shri

B.B.Singh covering all the material contentions of Written

Statement filed by IInd party. It is stated that for said

misconduct of Ist party, punishment of withholding one

increment is imposed.

4. Ist party/workman has not submitted statement

of claim neither adduced any evidence. The demand under

reference of Ist party therefore cannot be accepted.

5. In the result, award is passed as under:-

“ The Act of IInd party imposing punishment of stoppage

of annual increment of Ist party is just and legal.”

6. Let the copies of the award be sent to the

Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment

as per rules.

R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 3 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk-1563-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj phiQ tujy

eSustj] Vsfydke] ukxiqj ds çca/ra=k ds laca¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj

muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ

la[;k lhthvkbZVh@,ylh@vkj@91@96) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks

dsUæh; ljdkj dks 28&6&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹iQk- la- ,y&40012@251@1994&vkbZ vkj (Mh;w)º

tksgu rksiuks] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 3rd July, 2013

S.O.1563.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Dipute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGIT/

LC/R/91/96) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in

the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to

the management of The Chief General Manager, Telecom,

Nagpur and Their workman which was received by the

Central Government on 28-6-2013.

[ F. No. L-40012/251/1994-IR(DU)]

JOHAN TOPNO, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM -LABOUR COURT,

JABALPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/R/91/96

SHRI R. B. PATLE, Presiding Offficer.

Shri Gulchand Sahu,

S/o Munnalal Sahu,

Near Bagudhana Gopal Factory,

Betul Gunj, Betul (MP) ....Workman

Versus

The Chief General Manager,

Telecom (RE) Project,

66, Bajajnagar, Nagpur ...Management

AWARD

Passed on this 21st day of March 2013

1. As per letter dated 27-3-96 by the Government of

India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is

received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under

4134

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Section-10 of I.D. Act, 1947 as per Notification No.

L-40012/251/94-IR (DU). The dispute under reference

relates to:

“Whether the action of the Chief General Manager,

Telecom (RE) Project, 66, Bajajnagar, Nagpur (MS)

in stopping Shri Gulchand S/o Munnalal Sahu, is

legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman

is entitled to?”

2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to

the parties, Ist party/workman submitted his statement of

claim at Page 7/1 to 7/3. It is case of Ist party workman that

he was employed by IInd party as casual labour from

June 1987. He was continuously working till July1989

abruptly he was discontinued without following process

of law. He further submits that he had completed 240 days

working in 12 calendar months preceding his retrenchment.

That he had requested management to regularize his

services and treat him as a permanent of the establishment

but instead of considering his request, the management

dispensed his services. He further submitted that in

Conciliation proceeding before ALC, IInd party had

admitted his working on its establishment. That Statement

of claim filed by Ist party workman was misplaced and he

filed fresh statement of claim. His contents that his services

are discontinued in violation of Section 25-G, H of ID Act.

He prayed for his reinstatement with all consequential

benefits.

3. IInd party management filed Written Statement at

page 8/1 to 8/3 of record. IInd party contents that applicant

was not appointed as per rule. He was engaged only as a

casual labour according to the need of the department.

That Ist party left work at his own without intimation to

the management. In June 89, Ist party workman worked for

18 days, thereafter he left the work. The breakup of working

days of Ist party is given in Para-2 of the Written Statement.

During July 87 to June 88, he had worked for 335 days,

from July 88, he had worked for 335 days, from July 88 to

Nov-88, to May 89, he was absent from work. It is submitted

that the Ist party workman has not completed 240 days

continuously during 12 calendar months from the date of

termination. The Railway Electrification was not a running

unit. Ist party himself left work. He is not terminated in

violation of provisions of ID Act. IInd party prayed for

rejection of his claim.

4. Considering pleadings on record, the points which

arise for my consideration and determination are as under.

My findings are recorded against each of them for the

reasons as below:-

(i)

Whether the action of the Chief

General Manager, Telecom (RE)

In Affirmative

Project, 66, Bajajnagar, Nagpur

(MS) in stopping Shri Gulchand

S/o Munnalal Sahu, is legal and

justified?

(ii)

If not, what relief the workman is

Workman is not

entitled to?”

entitled to any

relief prayed by

him.

REASONS

5. Ist party/workman is challenging his

discontinuation from service contending that he had

completed 240 days continuous service preceding his

retrenchment. That he was retrenched in violation of

Section 25-F , G and H of I.D.Act. IInd party denied those

contentions of the workman. The affidavit of evidence of

workman is filed stating the facts that he had completed

240 days service preceding his retrenchment. That he was

engaged by IInd party from May to June 1987 as casual

labour. He was continuously working till July 1989. His

attendance was entered in the muster roll. In his cross-

examination, Ist party says he received contention upto

Vth standard. He was working on daily wages, no written

exam was held prior to his engagement. He had not received

call from Employment Exchange. He had not received

appointment letter. He was doing work of laying cable in

the scheme. He had not read over the contents of affidavit

but signed on it.

6. In his further cross-examination, workman says

that from December 88 to May 89, he was discontinued

from work but he himself have not left the work. He was

working regularly. He denied sugestion that he had not

completed 240 days during any calendar year. That he

produced record about his working days.

7. That Ist party had produced copy of reply filed in

conciliation proceeding Exhibit W -1. The said document

also shows that in June 87 Ist party worked for 30 days,

from July 87 to June 88, he had worked for 335 days, from

July 88 to Nov-88, he worked for 127 days, from December

88 to May 89, he was not working, he had left the work.

Document Exhibit W-2 shows his working days as July 88

to November 88 - 17 days and thereafter June - 1989- 18

days. It also corroborate the contention of the IInd party

management.

8. The affidavit of evidence of management’s witness

Shri D.S. Thakur is filed covering the contentions taken in

Written Statement filed by IInd party that the workman

had left work without intimation from December 88 to May

1989. In June 1989 he worked for 18 days in July 88 to June

1989 he worked for 145 days. In his cross-examination,

management witness says that he has stated about

working days of the workman from the record available

with him. The suggestion of Ist party that workman was

denied that workman working 240 days. Evidence adduced

by Ist party is not satisfactory to establish that he had

worked for 240 days during 12 calendar months prior to

his retrenchment. Therefore Ist party is not covered as

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4135

workman under Section 25 (b) of LD.Act. Consequently

he is not entitled to protection under Section 25-F of

ID.Act. There is no violation of Section 25-G of the ID.Act.

9. Counsel for IInd party Mr. Khare relies on -

Ratio held in Secretary, State of Karnataka and others

Versus Umadevi and others in 2006(4) supreme Court Cases 1.

Their Lordship of the Apex Court held that Supreme Court

and High Courts should not issue such directions unless

the recruitment itself was made regularly and in terms of

the constitutional scheme.

That casual labor donot have any right to regular or

permanent public employment. Further temporary,

contractual, casual, adhoc or daily wage public

employment must be deemed to be accepted by the

employee concerned fully knowing the nature of it and

the consequences flowing from it.

Next reliance is placed on-

“ Ratio held in M.P.State Agro Industries

Development Corporation Ltd and Another Versus

S.C.Pandey in 2006(2) Supreme Court Cases 716.

Their Lordship dealing with casual labour, daily

wager held that a daily wager doesnot hold a post

as he is not appointed in terms of the provisions of

the Act and Rules framed thereunder and therefore

he doesnot derive any legal right.”

Reliance is also placed on ratio held in 2007(III)

MPWN 49. It is held by their Lordship that on completion

of work for more than 240 days, it doesnot confer the right

to regularization - it imposes certain obligation on employer

at the time of termination of services.

Same view was taken by their Lordship in case of

Batala Coop. sugar Mills Ltd. Versus Sowaran Singh

reported in 2005(8) Supreme Court Cases 481 .

10. Considering the evidence on record, Ist party

has failed to establish that he was working for 240 days

during 12 calendar months preceding his retrenchment.

Therefore he is not entitled to protection under Section

25-F of LD.Act. For above reasons, I record my finding in

Point No.1 in Negative.

11. In the result, award is passed as under:-

(1) Action of the management in stopping Shri Gulchand

S/o Munnalal Sahu, from work is legal and justified.

(2) 1st party/workman is not entitled to any relief as

prayed by him.”

12. Let the copies of the award be sent to the

Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment

as per rules.

R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 3 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk-1564-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj phiQ tujy

eSustj] ch-,l-,u-,y- Hkksiky ds çca/ra=k ds laca¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj

muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ

la[;k lhthvkbZVh@,ylh@vkj@47@2006) çdkf'kr djrh gS tks

dsUæh; ljdkj dks 28&6&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹iQk- la- ,y&40012@09@2006&vkbZ vkj (Mh;w)º

tksgu rksiuks] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 3rd July, 2013

S.O.1564.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Diputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT/

LC/R/47/2006) of the Central Government Industrial

Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the

Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers

in relation to the management of The Chief General

Manager, BSNL, Bhopal and their workman which was

received by the Central Government on 28-6-2013

[ F. No. L-40012/09/2006-IR(DU)]

JOHAN TOPNO, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM -LABOUR COURT,

JABALPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/R/47/2006

PRESIDING OFFICER: SHRI R.B. P ATLE

Shri Chandrashekhar Sharma,

S/o Shri Babulal Sharma,

R/o Krishnapuram Colony,

Near Jhansi Tirdha,

Shivpuri

....Workman

Versus

The Chief General Manager,

Telecom, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited,

MP circle, Hoshangabad Road,

Bhopal (MP)

.....Management

AWARD

Passed on this 8th day of May, 2013

1. As per letter dated 8-8-2006 by the Government of

India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is

received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under

Section -10 of LD.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.

L-40012/9/2006- IR(DU). The dispute under reference

relates to:

4136

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

“Whether the action of the Chief General Manager,

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Bhopal in terminating

the service of Shri Chandrasekhar Sharma w.e.f.

1-6-2002 is justified? If not, to what relief the workman

is entitled for?”

2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to

the parties. Ist party workman submitted statement of

claim. The case of Ist party workman is that he was engaged

as helper by IInd party management. He was paid Rs. 2300

per month. His services were illegally terminated from

1-6-2002. That juniors were continued in service. Provisions

of Section 25-G, H of I. D. Act was not followed. That

Section 25 (N) (O) of I.D. Act were violated. That he was

not served one month’s notice, pay in lieu of notice was

not paid to him. Termination of his services is illegal. Ist

party workman prays for setting aside order of his

termination and submits for reinstatement with

consequential benefits.

3. IInd party management filed Written Statement.

All the material contentions of Ist party are denied. That

casual labours are engaged by IInd party as per exigency

of work. That the labours are engaged through contractor.

That since 1986, any body is not appointed. There is no

question of termination of service of workman as he was

not appointed by management. It is submitted that workman

is not entitled to retrenchment compensation. They have

not worked for 240 days in any of the calendar year.

Violation of Section 25-G, H is denied, IInd party prays for

rejection of claim of Ist party workman.

4. Considering pleadings on record, the points which

arise for my consideration and determination are as under.

My findings are recorded against each of them for the

reasons as below:—

(i)

Whether the action of the Chief

General Manager, Bharat Sanchar

In Affirmative

Nigam Ltd. Bhopal in terminating

the services of Shri Chandrasekhar

Sharma w.e.f. 1-6-2002 is justified?

(ii)

If so, to what relief the workman

Relief prayed

is entitled to?”

by workman

are rejected.

REASONS

5. Ist party workman has not submitted any evidence

in support of his claim. He has proceeded exparte on

2-3-12. The contentions of Ist party workman that he had

completed 240 days continuous service during each of

the year, that he was not paid retrenchment compensation,

was not paid notice pay is not substantiated by evidence.

IInd party filed affidavit of evidence of its evidence Shri

Pramod Kumar Jain. The witness of the management has

stated in affidavit that workman had not worked in the

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd., no appointment letter was

given to him. That the post is not vacant in the department.

The evidence of management’s witness remained

unchallenged as Ist party workman remained absent and

faild to cross-examine the witness. To sum up, workman

has not adduced evidence, the evidence of management

remained unchallenged. Ist party workman failed to

establish that action taken by management of IInd party

is illegal. For above reasons, I record my finding in Point

No. 1 in Affirmative.

6. Point No. 2 - In view of my finding in Point No. 1,

the workman is not entitled to relief prayed by him.

Accordingly I record my finding in Point No. 2.

7. In the result, award is passed as under:-

(1) Termination of Shri Chandrasekhar Sharma

w.e.f. 1-6-2002 is legal.

(2) Relief prayed by workman are rejected.

8. Let the copies of the award be sent to the

Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment

as per rules.

R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 3 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk-1565-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ ,iQ lh

vkbZ ds çca/ra=k ds laca¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- 2] p.Mhx<+ ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k

1576@2009) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 3&7&2013

dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹iQk- la- ,y&22011@66@2008&vkbZ vkj (lh,e&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 3rd July, 2013

S.O.1565.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Diputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 1576/

2009) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum -

Labour Court, No. 2, Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure,

in the Industrial dispute between the management of Food

Corporation of India, and Their workmen, received by the

Central Government on 3-7-2013.

[ F. No. L-22011/66/2008-IR(CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4137

ANNEXURE

IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL

TRIBUNAL- CUM -LABOUR COURT-II,

CHANDIGARH

Present: Sri A.K. Rastogi, Presiding Officer

Case No. I. D. 1576/2009

Registered on 13-2-2009

Sh. S .P. Sood, District Secetary,

Bhartiya Khadya Nigam Karamchari Sangh,

Food Corporation of India, Opposite Anaj Mandi,

Sirhind Road, Pariala,

....Petitioner

Versus

1. The Chairman-cum-Managing Director, Food

Corporation of India, 16-20, Barakhamba Lane, New Delhi.

2. The General Manager, Food Corporation of India,

Regional Office, Punjab #34 to 38, Sector 31A, Chandigarh.

3. The Executive Director (North), Food Corporation

to lndia, Plot No.2A, 2B, Sector 24, Gautam Budh Nagar,

Noida (U.P).

....Respondents

APPEARANCES

For the workman Sh. M.G. Sharma AR.

For the Management Sh. N.K. Zakhmi Advocate.

AWARD

Passed on June 14, 2013

Central Government vide Order No. L-22011/66/2008-

[IR(CM-II), dated 9-2-2009 by exercising its powers under

Section 10 Sub-section (1) Clause (d) and Sub-section

(2-A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter

referred to as ‘Act’) has referred the following Industrial

dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :—

‘‘Whether the action of the management of FCI in

imposing penalties on Sh. Shyam Lal Sharma in

charge-sheet No.21(BTI-3044)/97/795; Vig. Case No.

SGR 2547 and Vig. Case No. SGR 2662 is legal and

justified? To what relief is the workman concerned

entitled?’’

The case of the workman is that he was in the

employment of the management since 1976. The

management had punished him for the faults not committed

by him viz. :

(i) In Vigilance Case No.BTI-3044 dated 20-4-1998

he was punished by stoppage of one increment w.e.f.

1-1-1999 on the charge of misrepresentation/

misleading the department.The action was however

withdrawn by the management during the

conciliation proceedings after about 11 years. His

claim for replenishment of damages demanded by

him in the demand notice has not been satisfied.

(ii) In Vigilance Case No.SGR-2547/96 dated

10-2-1997 though the Inquiry Officer has held the

charges, of acceptance of BRL Rice having dehusk

15 per cent against permissible limit of 13 per cent

and discoloured refraction as 3.6 per cent and 3.5

per cent in stack No.C/3/8 and N/4 respectively as

against permissible limit of 3 per cent, not proved;

yet, the disciplinary authority issued a Dissent Note

and wrongly imposed the penalty of stoppage of

one increment without cumulative effect w.e.f.

1-1-2000.

(iii) In third case Vigilance Case No.SGR-2662/97

dated 5-10-1999 charges of acceptance of BRL Rice

in respect of dehusk refraction in stack/contact No.

3/O/417= 250 bags, H/2/109 = 250 bags and F/8/306

= 250 bags and broken refractions in stack No.F/8/

306 = 250 bags and E/5/305 = 250 bags framed against

the workman are not tenable. The results arrived at

RO lab have no veracity/sanctity. The margin of

allowances to cover up the human error allowed in

other cases was not given to workman.

The workman has prayed that the misjudgment as

well as disparity committed in his case be removed by

affecting a replenishment of the damages of Rs.9,50,000

suffered by the workman due to social setbacks, promotion

having been lost in between, physical harassment, mental

agony, financial losses, no benefit earned by way of

enhancement of educational qualifications during the

transitory period, loss of stagnation increments and

selection grade being TA-II since 1986 though now

promoted as TA-I w.e.f. February 2009. The promotion of

the workman from TA-II to TA-I was due in the panel of

2000 which may be granted in view of the workman being

innocent.

Claim was contested by the management and the

facts stated by the workman about the three charges

mentioned in the reference had been admitted. With regard

to Vigilance Case No.SGR 2662 it was further stated that

the disciplinary authority has imposed penalty of stoppage

of one increment without cumulative effect vide order

dated 5-10-1999. According to the management the

workman was not performing his duty with due diligence,

devotion and honesty and the conduct of the workman

reflected that he was involved in a number of vigilance

cases for which he was awarded penalty and in some of

the cases he was left with warnings.

Further, the management case regarding Vigilance

Case No.(BTI-3044)/97/795 is that the penalty of stoppage

of one increment without cumulative effect and that too

4138

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

withdrawn subsequently would not have caused loss to

the tune of Rs.9,50,000 to the workman. The workman has

failed to give the details as to how penalty of stoppage of

one increment without cumulative effect has been worked

out to such a huge amount. As per record total amount of

Rs.1,950 has been recovered from the salary of the workman

against penalty order dated 8-5-2008. Hence claim of the

workman in this regard is totally vague and is not tenable

in the eye of law. In this case he had been awarded

punishment due to mistake of identity of some other Sham

Lal TA-II and when this inadvertence came to the notice

of the management the order of punishment was withdrawn.

According to management in all the vigilance cases

except one the charges have been proved. There was no

disparity as alleged by the workman and the claim of

Rs.9,50,000 is baseless. In view of the facts of the case the

workman is not entitled to promotion as prayed. The claim

is therefore vague and deserves dismissal.

In support of his claim the workman examined himself

while on behalf of the management Sh. Mohinder Singh,

Assistant General Manager Vigilance was examined. Parties

relied on certain documents also.

I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and

also perused the evidence on record and the written

arguments filed by them.

Under reference is the action of the management in

imposing penalties on the workman in the following three

cases—

1. Charge-sheet No.21 (BTI-3044)/97/795,

2. Vigilance Case No.SGR-2547

3. Vigilance Case No.SGR-2662

Admittedly in all the three cases minor punishment

of stoppage of one increment without cumulative effect

had been given. In the first case however it was found

that the workman had been punished by inadvertence for

another employee of the same name Shyam Lal and

therefore the penalty was withdrawn. But this mistake was

deducted after about ten years during the conciliation

proceedings. Therefore admittedly in this case the penalty

imposed was not legal and justified and the same stands

withdrawn too. But the dispute is about the relief, the

workman claims to be entitled on account of the wrong

punishment in this case. It has been argued on behalf of

workman that damages worth Rs.9,50,000 were caused to

the workman by way of losing stagnation increment,

selection grade, mental agony and because of the

prolonged battle thrust upon the workman by the

management in the said case and the same may be recovered

from the salaries of the officials/officers concerned at

Regional Office, Chandigarh/Zonal Office Noida/Head

Quarter, New Delhi.

In this regard the management has argued that the

workman has failed to give any cogent reason; cause,

documents or any proof about having suffered loss of

Rs.9,50,000 while the management has proved that no loss

has been caused to the petitioner because as per record

total amount of Rs.l,950 has been recovered from the salary

of the workman against the penalty. During the cross-

examination the workman himself has categorically stated

that a stoppage of one increment resulted into a loss of

Rs. l,950 towards the salary only.

I agree with the learned counsel for the management

that there is no basis or justification for awarding damages

as claimed by workman. Moreover I am of the view that

only a relief of the ascertained amount may be awarded by

the Tribunal and the general damages on account of

‘‘social setbacks, promotion, having been lost in between,

physical harassment, mental agony, financial losses, no

benefit earned by way of enhancement of education and

qualifications during the transitory period’’ (as claimed in

para 8 of claim statement), can be awarded by the Tribunal

in an industrial dispute. The award of general damages is

in the domain of a Civil Court. I am of the view that the

workman is entitled to get back the amount of Rs.l,950

recovered from his salary, against penalty imposed in

Charge-sheet No.21(BTI-3044)/97/795.

With regard to Vigilance Case No.SGR-2547 it has

been argued on behalf of workman that though the Inquiry

Officer had not found the workman guilty yet the

disciplinary authority on the basis of his Dissent Note

which had been contested by the workman imposed the

penalty of stoppage of one increment without cumulative

effect though in this case also the workman was not guilty

since the rice samples had not been drawn in the presence

of the workman and management-witness has admitted

that superficially discoloured grains had been considered

under discoloured head instead of under slightly damaged

head. But the argument of the learned counsel for workman

in this regard is against the record. The management-

witness instead has stated that it is wrong to say that

even superficiary discoloured grain had been considered

as discoloured.

The learned counsel for the workman in this regard

has also relied on the statement of Sh. Dungar Singh,

CGAL, New Delhi Exhibit E3 given by him in some other

case. But that being a statement of a living person cannot

be considered in this case. Similarly Exhibit E 11 order of

FCI, Regional Office, Punjab, Chandigarh relating to some

other case cannot be considered in this case. It is true that

management-witness in his cross-examination was unable

to tell the ground on which the disciplinary authority had

disagreed with the Inquiry Officer but that cannot be a

ground for rejecting the Dissenting Note. It is important

to note that the said Dissenting Note was not filed by the

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4139

parties and the punishment awarded by the disciplinary

authority in this case also was a stoppage of one increment

without cumulative effect which is a minor punishment.

under Rule 11 of CCS(CCA) Rules. Rule 15(2) provides-

‘‘The disciplinary authority shall, if it disagrees with

the findings of the inquiry authority on any article

of charge, record its reasons for such disagreement

and record its own findings on such charge if the

evidence recorded is sufficient for the purpose.’’

Sub-Rule 3 of Rule 15 provides—

‘‘(iii) If the disciplinary authority having regard to

its findings on or any of the article of charges is of

the opinion that any of the penalties specified in

Clause (i) to (iv) of Rule 11 should be imposed on

the Government servant, it shall, notwithstanding

anything contained in Rule 16, make an order

imposing such penalty.’’

It is not the case of the workman that the disciplinary

authority in his Dissenting Note has not given the reasons

for dissent and has not recorded its findings on the charge.

The workman in his statement during cross-examination

has admitted to have received a show cause notice

regarding the Dissent Note, and to have replied that notice.

The learned counsel for management in this regard has

also argued that from the affidavit of management-witness

it is clear that during the year 1996 the workman had been

assigned the job to accept the rice stocks strictly

conforming to laid down specifications but he failed to do

so. In June 2006 a squad had visited Sunam Centre with a

view to adjudge the quality of rice stocks accepted by the

workman and others and had drawn representative samples

and on analysis the stocks of two samples accepted by

the workman had been found BRL. Charge-sheet SGR-

2547 had been issued in this regard for major penalty.

Inquiry Officer had exonerated the workman but the

disciplinary authority issued a memorandum containing

reasons of disagreement with the findings of Inquiry Officer

and serve upon the workman. The defence reply tendered

by the workman was found unsatisfactory and

consequently he was imposed minor penalty.

I agree with the learned counsel for management

that the punishment in this case cannot be said to be

illegal and unjustified.

It is true, as the learned counsel for workman has

argued that under Rule 15 of CCS(CCA) Rules, a period of

three months has been provided for passing orders on

inquiry report and the disciplinary authority in this case

passed the penalty order after about two years but that

cannot be a ground for holding the punishment order illegal.

Regarding third case Vigilance Case No. SGR-2662 it

has been argued by learned counsel for workman that

sampling was defective, the determination of the broken

refraction of the rice was made wrongly, analysis was

manual and to cover human error margin of allowance was

acceded by the management and the analysis was not

made properly. But the argument of workman in this regard

is not acceptable in the absence of any expert evidence.

The documents Exhibit E4, E8, E9, E13 to E15 cannot help

the workman in this regard.

It has also been argued on behalf of workman that in

SGR-2662 there were 62 consignments but only six

pertained to the workman, and other officials or officers

involved in rest of the 56 samples had been issued charge-

sheet under major penalties and one Harjas Rai Sharma

TA-II who was involved in 17 samples and had been

heavily penalized by the disciplinary authority got his

penalty modified by the Appellate/Reviewing

Authority.While the appeal of the workman was rejected

by the Appellate/Reviewing Authority. According to the

workman he was not given equal treatment.

In this regard it is important that the charge-sheet

with regard to other officials had not been filed in the case

and it is not known as to what were the charges against

them and whether their case was similar to that of workman.

I agree with the learned counsel for management that the

punishment in this case cannot be said to be illegal and

unjustified. In Vigilance Case No.SGR-2662 the workman

had been charge-sheeted under minor penalty and on

receipt of his defence reply, which was considered

unsatisfactory he was imposed again the penalty of

stoppage of one increment without cumulative effect.

Punishment cannot be said to be illegal or unjustified.

From the above going discussion it is clear that there

is nothing wrong and illegal in punishment awarded to

workman in Vigilance Case No.SGR-2547 and Vigilance

Case No.SGR-2662. The punishment awarded by

management in charge-sheet No. 21(DTI-3044) 97/795 was

admittedly wrong and has been withdrawn since then.

Amount of Rs.l,950 recovered from the workman, if not

already repaid to workman be paid to him. So far as the

relief of promotion from 2000 is concerned it is clear from

the statement of management-witness that the promotion

of workman had been withheld on account of cases

No. SGR 2527 and case No.SGR 2662. The workman is not

entitled to the relief claimed in this regard and in this way

he is not entitled to any other relief. The reference is

accordingly answered. Hard and soft copy of the award

be sent to the Central Government and copy of the award

be sent to the District Judge Patiala for information and

further necessary action.

ASHOK KUMAR RASTOGI, Presiding Officer

4140

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ubZ fnYyh] 3 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1566-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ ih- th-

vkbZ- ds çca/ra=k ds laca¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- 2] p.Mhx<+ ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k

763@2005) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 3&7&2013

dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹iQk- la- ,y&42012@211@2003&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 3rd July, 2013

S.O. 1566.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 763/

2005) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court No. 2, Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure,

in the Industrial Dispute between the management of PGI

and their workmen, received by the Central Government

on 3-7-2013.

[ F. No. L- 42012/211/2003-IR (CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL

TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT-II,

CHANDIGARH

Present : Sri A. K. Rastogi, Presiding Officer

Case No. I.D. No. 763/2005

Registered on 5-9-2005

Sh. Pawan Kumar S/o Sh. Motha Singh

House No. 1289, Phase I,

Ram Darbar, UT, Chandigarh

......Petitioner

Versus

The Director, PGI,

Sector-12, Chandigarh

.....Respondent

Appearances :

For the workman :

Sh. Arun Batra, Advocate.

For the Management :

Sh. N. K. Zakhmi, Advocate.

AWARD

Passed on 19th June, 2013

Central Government vide Notification No. L-42012/

211/2003-IR(CM-II) dated 17-8-2004 by exercising tis powers

under Section 10, Sub-section (1) Clause (d) and Sub-

section (2A) of the of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

(hereinafter referred to as ‘Act’) has referred the following

Industrial dispute for adjudication to the Tribunal :—

“Whether the action of the management of PGI,

Chandigarh in removing Sh. Pawan Kumar, Ex-

Safaiwala, from service w.e.f. 12.4.1997 is legal and

justified? If not, to what relief is the workman

entitled?”

As per claim statement the workman was working as

Safaiwala w.e.f. 11.1.1995 with the management. On

31.12.1996 he was arrested in connection of an FIR No.135

under Section 147, 149, 323, 452 and 380 of IPC. On account

of his arrest in the said case the management terminated

his services on 12.4.1997. The grievance of the workman is

that the management did not conduct any departmental

inquiry and without following the disciplinary action

procedure terminated his services in a slip shod manner

by holding a preliminary inquiry on the ground that he

remained in the police custody for more than 48 hours and

his conduct was unbecoming of an employee. He was not

given any opportunity of defence. The workman however

was subsequently acquitted on 6.9.2002 by the Court.

According to him he is entitled to reinstatement w.e.f.

12.4.1997 i.e. the date of his termination.

The claim was contested by the management and it

was stated that the workman was just a daily wager initially

appointed for a . period of 89 days. As he had been arrested

in the above mentioned criminal case and remained in

police custody from 31.12.1996 to 3.1.1997, hence a

preliminary inquiry was conducted giving full opportunity

to present/defend his case. In the inquiry he had given his

statement which was duly considered by the Inquiry Officer

and since he had remained in the police custody for the

period from 31.12.1996 to 3.1.1997 hence, his services were

terminated. Management has further pleaded that the

workman has been acquitted on account of benefit of

doubt and therefore his conduct does not warrant his

reinstatement. Further his appointment was not in

consonance of the Recruitment Rules hence, otherwise

also he has no legal right to claim employment.

In support of his case workman examined himself

and filed a copy of termination order and of judgment of

Criminal Court given in the criminal case. The documents

have been marked as ‘A’ and ‘B’. On behalf of the

management P.C. Akela, Senior Administrative Officer of

PGIMER examined himself and filed papers.Exhibit M2 to

M8.

I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and

perused the evidence on record. The facts of the case are

not in dispute. As is clear from the termination order Exhibit

M8 dated 12.7.1997 the services of the workman were

terminated after preliminary inquiry on the ground that

the workman had remained in police custody w.e.f.

31.12.1996 to 2.1.1997 and this conduct of the workman

was unbecoming of an employee.

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4141

The argument of the learned counsel for workman is

that the termination of the service is a major penalty and it

can be inflicted only after a departmental inquiry

conducted according to the principle of natural justice.·

The workman should have been charge-sheeted and

informed about the specific allegations along with

proposed evidence against him, he must have been

provided an opportunity to plead his case, the documents

should have been made available to him and an

opportunity of hearing should have been given to him.

Preliminary inquiry is not a departmental inquiry and is

simply a fact finding inquiry in which the participation of

the workman was not necessary even.

The learned counsel for the management on the

other hand argued that in the first place the workman was

a daily wager initially appointed for a period of 89 days

and no procedure had been followed in his appointment,

therefore he has no right to claim employment with the

management. Secondly in the inquiry he had been given

opportunity to present his case before the Inquiry Officer

and in his statement dated 21.3.1997 he had admitted that

he could not inform his superiors on account of his

ignorance of the rules in this regard. Therefore the

termination order is according to law and the workman is

not entitled to any relief.

It is true that workman had been appointed in a short

term vacancy as a daily wager on contract through

appointment letter Exhibit M2 but this appointment was

only for 89 days. The workman continued in the

employment of the management even after the period of

89 days mentioned in this letter. It is also true that there is

nothing on record to show that’ the workman had been

employed as per Recruitment Rules. Hence it is clear that

he has no right to the post but it does not mean that the

management is at liberty to throw the workman on streets

without following the procedure.

From the record it appears that instead of a charge-

sheet containing detailed information about the allegations

against him the workman had been handed over a Memo

Exhibit M5 issued by the Inquiry Officer requiring the

workman to attend his office on the given date and time to

explain his position. In the letter mentioned subject is

“regarding arrest of Sh. Pawan Kumar S/o Sh. Motha Singh,

Safaiwala PGI, Chandigarh.” Neither the date of arrest nor

the duration of custody nor the proposed evidence and

nor the reference of the Rule violated by the workman is

mentioned in the said memo.

Secondly, as is Clear from the termination order

Exhibit M8 the services of the workman were terminated

because he had remained under the police custody for

more than 48 hours under the provisions of Criminal

Procedure Code and his conduct was unbecoming of an

employee. There is no reference of any rule or provision

which declares the detention of a Government servant for

more than 48 hours as unbecoming of a Government

employee.

Here it is important to note that as per G.I., M.H.A.

Letter No.39/59/54-Est.(A) dated 25th February, 1955

referred at page 10 in para 2 under ‘GOVERNMENT OF

INDIA’S DECISION’ in Swami’s Compilation of Conduct

Rules it is the duty of a Government servant who may be

arrested for any reason to intimate the fact of his arrest

and the circumstances connected therewith to his official

superior promptly even though he might have

subsequently been released on bail. Failure on the part of

any Government servant to so inform his official superior

will be regarded as suppression of material information

and will render him liable to disciplinary action on this

ground alone, apart from the action that may be called for

on the outcome of the police case against him.

It shows that merely detention in a criminal case is

not sufficient to warrant any departmental action. It is the

failure of the Government servant to inform his superiors

about his detention which may invite disciplinary action

against him. In this case the services of the workman has

not been terminated on the ground that he did not inform

his superiors about his detention. But his services were

terminated simply on the ground of detention which in my

opinion is not according to law.

I am therefore of the view that in the present case

neither a proper departmental inquiry was conducted nor

the order dated 12.4.1997 of the management of PGI,

Chandigarh in removing the workman is according to law

and justified. The order dated 12.4.1997, therefore is

quashed and the workman is reinstated. The workman

however will not be entitled to any back wages and

continuous service in view of the fact that his appointment

was not according to rules. The management of PGI is

directed to reinstate the workman within one month after

receiving the copy of the award. The reference is

accordingly decided in favour of the workman. Hard and

soft copy of the Award be sent to the Central Government

and one copy of the Award be sent to the District Judge

Chandigarh for information and further necessary action.

A. K. RASTOGI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 3 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1567-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ ,iQ-lh-

vkbZ- ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- 2] p.Mhx<+ ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k

537@2005) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 3&7&2013

dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹iQk- la- ,y&22012@233@1997&vkbZvkj (lh&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

4142

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 3rd July, 2013

S.O. 1567.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 537/

2005) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court No. 2, Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure,

in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation

to the management of FCI and their workmen, which was

received by the Central Government on 3-7-2013.

[ F. No. L- 22012/233/1997-IR (C-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL

TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT-II,

CHANDIGARH

Present : Sri A.K. Rastogi, Presiding Officer

Case No. 537/2005

Registered on 22.8.2005

Sh. Birbal Singh S/o Sh. Ishar Singh,

Khamal Kalan, Tehsil Suman, Sangrur

......Applicant

Versus

Regional Manager, FCI, RO (PB),

Sector 34, Chandigarh

....Respondent

APPEARANCES

For the Workman

-

Sh. R.P. Rana, Adv.

For the Management

-

Sh. Santokh Singh, Adv.

AWARD

Passed on 6.6.2013

Vide Order No. L-22012/233/97-IR(CM-II), dated

22.07.1998 the Central Government in exercise of the

powers conferred by Clause (d) of sub-section (1) and

Sub-Section 2(A) of Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act,

1947 (in short Act) has referred the aforesaid industrial

disputes for adjudication to the Tribunal.

“Whether the action of the management of Food

Corporation of India in terminating the services of

Sh. Birbal Singh S/o Sh. Isher Singh, w.e.f. 01.11.1992

is legal and justified? If not, to what relief is the

workman entitled and from which date?”

As per claim statement the workman had been

employed as Pelladar on 20.4.1985 and his services were

terminated on 1.11.1992 without any notice, charge-sheet,

inquiry and compensation. While terminating his services

juniors were retained and after his termination new hands

were also employed. He was a member of EPF. His

termination is illegal and unjustified. He has prayed for

his reinstatement with continuity of service and full back

wages.

Management filed written statement and

subsequently amended written statement. According to

management workman was never employed in FCI as

Pelladar hence, the question of termination from service

does not arise. It was also denied that he was member of

the Employees Provident Fund. According to management

he may be under the EPF through his employer

M/s Gurcharan Singh and Company who was the Handling

Transport Contractor during the period from 20.3.1991 to

19.3.1993. It was also denied that the FCI paid any salary

to the workman.

In evidence workman examined himself while on

behalf of management Mohinder Singh, Area Manager

was examined. Workman had summoned attendance

register from the management on which the management

had replied that since the workman was not in his

employment hence no record of his evidence was being

maintained by the management.

I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and

perused the evidence on record. I need not to say that

since the workman is alleging to be in the employment of

the management hence, it was for him to prove the fact.

He however has failed in proving the relationship of

employer and employee between the management and

himself. From his statement it is clear that he was not

registered with the Employment Exchange and there was

no notification in the newspapers for the vacancies. There

is no appointment letter and there is no evidence that he

was being paid by the management. He had filed a

photocopy of an I. Card issued from FCI but said nothing

in his statement about this document. The management

witness in his statement denied that the workman had

been employed by management or he was removed from

the service by the management.

From the evidence on record it is clear that the

workman has failed to prove his employment and

termination by the management. No question of legality

and justification of the termination from service of the

workman by the management arise. The reference is

answered against the workman. He is not entitled to any

relief. Let soft copy and hard copy of the award be sent to

the Central Government for further necessary action.

ASHOK KUMAR RASTOGI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 3 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1568-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ ,iQ-lh-

vkbZ- ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa jk"Vªh; vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k]

eqacbZ ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 1@2007) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks

dsUæh; ljdkj dks 3&7&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹iQk- la- ,y&22012@28@2002&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4143

New Delhi, the 3rd July, 2013

S.O. 1568.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 1/

2007) of the National Tribunal, Mumbai as shown in the

Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the

management of Food Corporation of India and their

workmen, received by the Central Government on 3-7-

2013.

[ F. No. L- 22012/28/2002-IR (CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL,

MUMBAI

Present :

Justice G. S. Sarraf, Presiding Officer

COMPLAINT NO. NTB-1 OF 2007

(Arising out of Ref. No. NTB-1 of 2003)

Parties:

FCI Workers Union, Calcutta

.....Complainant

V/s.

Food Corporation of India,

New Delhi

..... Opposite Party

Appearance :

For the Complainant

:

Mr. Umesh Nabar, Advocate

For the Opposite Party

: Mr. Prabhakar Rao, Advocate

Mumbai, dated 30th day of May, 2013.

AWARD

The complainant has filed this complaint under

Section 33-A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

Final arguments heard.

The applicant has filed this complaint with the prayer

that the rate of payment of the wages applicable to the

workmen immediately before the commencement of the

proceedings under Ref. NO. NTB-1 of 2003 be restored

and the circular no. 16 of 2006 dt. 27. 7 .2006 and letter

No. IR(L)/3(6)/88- Vo1.III dt. 6.11.2006 be quashed and set

aside.

By circular no. 7/2007 dt. 9.10.2007 issued by the FCI

the circular no.16 dt. 27. 7 .2006 referred to hereinabove

has been kept in abeyance till the proceedings before the

National Industrial Tribunal in the instant matter are closed

and the Regional Offices have been directed to calculate

and implement the respective ASOR percent applicable to

DPS workers as per the Headquarters Circular no. l0/2006

dt 4.4.2006 till further orders.

It is thus clear that the circular no. 16 of 2006 dt.

27.7.2006 which changed the service conditions of the

workmen and which has been challenged by the F.C.I.

Workers Union by way of this complaint has already been

placed in abeyance by the F.C.I. till the disposal of Ref.

No. NTB-1 of 2003.

In view of the above the circular no. 16 of 2006 dt.

27.7.2006 will remain in abeyance till the decision in the

decision in Ref. No. NTB-1 of 2003 and thereafter the FCI

will issue fresh circular in accordance with the award in

NTB-l of 2003.

The complaint stands disposed of as above .

JUSTICE G. S. SARRAF, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 3 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1569-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ ,lbZlh,y

ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 46@2007)

çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 3&7&2013 dks çkIr gqvk

Fkk A

¹iQk- la- ,y&22012@30@2006&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 3rd July, 2013

S.O. 1569.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 46/

2007) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in the

Industrial Dispute between the management of Johilla Area

of SECL, and their workmen, received by the Central

Government on 3-7-2013.

[ F. No. L- 22012/30/2006-IR (CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM-LABOUR-COURT,

JABALPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/R/46/07

PRESIDING OFFICER : SHRI R. B. PATLE

The President,

Koyla Mazdoor Sabha (HMS),

PO Nowrozabad,

Umaria (MP)

....Workman/Union

Versus

Chief General Manager,

Johilla Area of SECL,

PO Nowrozabad,

Umaria (MP)

....Management

4144

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

AWARD

Passed on this 6th day of June, 2013

1. As per letter dated 1-5-2007 by the Government

of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is

received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under

Section 10 of I.D. Act, 1947 as per Notification

No. L-22012/30/2006-IR(CM-II). The dispute under

reference relates to:

‘

“ Whether the action of the management of SECL in

non-payment of alleged deduction from salary and

not to stop such deduction from salary is legal and

justified? If not, to what relief are the workmen

entitled?”

2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to

the parties. However workman failed to appear. Workman

is proceeded exparte as per order dated 13-7-2011. IInd

party filed Written Statement on 16-5-2012.

3. IInd party contends that it is not case of other

party that any deduction is being made from the salary

continuously. That there was no deduction as alleged by

the workers. The workers voluntarily donated

contributions for performing Ramlila followed by

celebration of Durga Puja. The management formed Joint

Consultative Committee(JCC) for discussion of all the

issues arising at the colliery level. The representatives of

Central Trade Unions are members of the said JCC. That

Durga Puja are celebrated by the employees. The

expenditure required to celebrate the Durga Puja/

Celebrating Ramlila is arranged through a committee being

constituted with participation of Union representative as

well as the management. That the meeting of Puja

Committee was held on 19-9-04. The Committee

unanimously decided to collect donations category-wise

between Rs. 70 to Rs. 160. As per said decision, the

donation were collected from employees with their

consent. It is submitted that no other Union raised

objection to those donation except representative of HMS

Union. That as no objection was made by employees for

refund of donation, the reference needs to be rejected.

4. Considering pleadings on record, the points

which arise for my consideration and determination are as

under. My findings are recorded against each of them for

the reasons as below :—

(i) Whether the action of the

management of SECL non-

payment of alleged deduction

from salary and not to stop

such deduction from

salary is legal and justified?

In Affirmative

(ii) If so, to what relief the

Relief prayed by

workman is entitled to?”

workman are rejected.

REASONS

5. Present reference relates to legality of collection

of donation from salary. However the 1st party Union has

not participated in the reference, Statement of claim is not

filed, no evidence is adduced to substantiate their claim.

6. Management of IInd party filed Written Statement

and affidavit of evidence contending that the ‘donation

for Durga Puja were collected as per the JCC meeting held

on 19-9-2004. The evidence remained unchallenged.

Documents are produced. As the Union failed to submit

statement of claim and adduce evidence, action of the

management cannot be said illegal. For above reasons, I

record my finding in Point No.1 in Affirmative.

7. In the result, the award is passed as under :—

“Action of the management of SECL in non-payment

of alleged deduction from salary and not to stop

such deduction from salary is legal. The relief prayed

by 1st party Union is rejected.”

8. Let the copies of the award be sent to the

Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment

as per rules.

R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 3 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1570-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ ,lbZlh,y

ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 84@2003)

dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 3&7&2013 dks çkIr

gqvk Fkk A

¹iQk- la- ,y&22012@156@2002&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 3rd July, 2013

S.O. 1570.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 84/

2003) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in the

Industrial Dispute between the management of Sohagpur

Area of SECL, and their workmen, received by the Central

Government on 3-7-2013.

[ F. No. L- 22012/156/2002-IR (CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRlBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

JABALPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/R/84/2003

Presiding Officer : Shri R. B. Patle

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4145

The Secretary,

M.P.Koyla Mazdoor Sabha (HMS),

Sohagpur Area of SECL,

PO Dhanpuri,

Distt. Shahdol

....Workman/Union

Versus

Chief General Manager,

Sohagpur Area of SECL,

PO Dhanpuri,

Distt. Shahdol (MP)

....Management

AWARD

Passed on this 6th day of June, 2013

1. As per letter dated 8-5-2003 by the Government

of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is

received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under

Section 10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.

L-22012/156/2002-IR(CM-II). The dispute under reference

relates to :

“ Whether the demand of Shri Intezar Ali, Survey

Mazdoor, Baiga OCM of SECL under Sohagpur Area

(represented by M.P. Koyla Mazdoor Sabha) to

regularize him as Typist/Clerk w.e.f. 22-9-94 alongwith

payment of difference of wages is legal and justified?

If so, to what relief the workman is entitled to?”

2. After notice, Ist party/workman submitted

Statement of claim at page 2/1 to 2/3 contending that the

workman was entitled for regularisation claimed by him.

The IInd party management submitted Written Statement

at Page 7/1 to 7/8 denying all material contentions of 1st

party. The parties have adduced evidence. Today when

the case is fixed for cross-examination of management’s

witness, the 1st party submitted application that he desires

to withdraw the case. Workman is present and admits that

he is not interested to prosecute his claim, therefore the

claim needs to be disposed of.

3. In the result, award is passed as under :—

“Claim of 1st party/workman stands disposed of as

withdrawn.”

R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 3 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1571-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ MCY;wlh,y

ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 51@2007)

dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 3&7&2013 dks çkIr

gqvk Fkk A

¹iQk- la- ,y&22012@10@2007&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 3rd July, 2013

S.O. 1571.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 51/

2007) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in the

Industrial Dispute between the management of Western

Coalfields Limited, and their workmen, received by the

Central Government on 3-7-2013.

[F. No. L- 22012/10/2007-IR (CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

JABALPUR

No. CGIT/LC/R/51/07

Presiding Officer : SHRI R. B. PATLE

The General Secretary,

Bhartiya Koyla Khadan Mazdoor Sangh (BMS),

Vishwakarma Bhawan,

Post Parasia,

Distt. Chhindwara

...Workman/Union

Versus

Chief General Manager,

Western Coalfields Limited,

Kanhan Area,

PO Dungaria,

Chhindwara

...Management

AWARD

Passed on this 10th day of June 2013

1. As per letter dated 26-6-2007 by the Government

of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is

received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under

Section 10 of I.D. Act, 1947 as per Notification No. L-22012/

l0/2007-IR(CM-II). The dispute under reference relates to :

“Whether the action of the management of M/s WCL

in not correcting the date of initial appointment of

Shri Ramakant Singh as 4-5-1980 is legal and justified?

If not, to what relief is the workman entitled?”

2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to

the parties. 1st party workman failed to submit .his

statement of claim. He is proceeded exparte on 13-7-2011.

The management filed Written Statement on 19-12-2011.

The management of IInd party submits that the workman

along with other were engaged as casual labours

4146

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

intermittently as and when required basis. The management

decided to regularize those persons engaged as casuals

as soon as regular vacancy of General Mazdoor arose.

The eligibility of selection against regular vacancy is that

one should be ex-casual and have put in attendance not

less than 190/240 days.

3. It is further submitted that the Sub Area Manager,

Nandan Colliery opposed for regularization to 202 casual

workers into General Mazdoor Cat-I who had completed

190/240 days for underground and surface. That Ist party

workman was regularized as General Mazdoor along with

other labours whose name was appearing at Sl. No. 19 of

list. He was regularized w.e.f. 6-2-82. The list was approved

by General Manager, Kanhan Area on next day. The said

claim of 1st party for correction of date of appointment as

7-9-1980 cannot be accepted. IInd party prayed for rejection

of award.

4. Considering pleadings on record, the points

which arise for my consideration and’ determination are as

under. My findings are recorded against each of them for

the reasons as below :—

(i)

Whether the action of the

In Affirmative

management of M/s WCL in

not correcting the date of

initial appointment of Shri

Ramakant Singh as 4-5-1980

is legal and justified?

(ii) If so, to what relief the

Relief prayed by

workman is entitled to?”

workman is rejected.

REASONS

5. Ist party is praying for correcting of date of

regularization in General Mazdoor Category from 4-5-1980

as per the terms of reference. He failed to file his statement

of claim. Ilnd party submitted Written Statement and

contents that Ist party was regularized in General Mazdoor

Category-I from 6-2-1982. The affidavit of evidence of

management Mr. P. K. Tripathi also states that Ist party

workman was regularized in General Mazdoor category

from 6-2-84. The General Manager, Kanhan Area had

approved said list on 7-2-82. Evidence of witness remained

unchallenged. I find no reason to disbelieve his statement

on oath. For above reasons, I record my finding in Point

No.1 in Affirmative.

6. In the result, award is passed as under :—

“(1)

The action of the management of M/s WCL

in not correcting the date of initial

appointment of Shri Ramakant Singh as

4-5-1980 is legal and justified.

(2)

Relief prayed by workman is rejected.”

R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 3 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1572-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ ,lbZlh,y

ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 33@2007)

dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 3&7&2013 dks çkIr

gqvk Fkk A

¹iQk- la- ,y&22012@29@2006&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 3rd July, 2013

S.O. 1572.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 33/

2007) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in the

Industrial Dispute between the management of Johilla Area

of SECL, and their workmen, received by the Central

Government on 3-7-2013.

[ F. No. L- 22012/29/2006-IR (CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

JABALPUR

No. CGIT/LC/R/33/07

Presiding Officer : SHRI R. B. PATLE

The President,

Koyla Shramik Sabha (UTUC),

Central Committee,

Vindhya Colony,

Umaria (MP)

...Workman/Union

Versus

Chief General Manager,

Johilla Area of SECL,

PO Nowrozabad,

Umaria (MP)

...Management

AWARD

Passed on this 16-5-2013

1. As per letter dated 28-02-2007 by the Government

of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is

received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under

Section -10 of I.D. Act, 1947 as per Notification No. L-22012/

29/2006-IR(CM-II). The dispute under reference relates to :

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4147

“Whether the action of the management of SECL in

not providing employment to the dependent of Late

Shri Chamroolal Yadav is legal and justified? If not,

to what relief is the dependent of the deceased

workman entitled?”

2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to

the parties. Ist party dependent failed to appear. She was

proceeded exparte on 21-7- 2011.

3. Management filed Written Statement on 27-1-2012

“denying the claim of the depending for appointment on

compassionate ground. IInd party submits that under Rule-

10 of I.D.Act, the parties raising dispute needs to file

statement of claim with relevant documents. Ist party

workman has not complied said provisions. Union did not

filed any statement of claim. That the service conditions

of Coal Mine Workers are covered by Standing Orders,

NCWA, Circulars Instructions issued by management time

to time etc. clause 9.3.2/9/4/0/9.5.0 deals with providing

dependant employment in case a workman died during the

course of employment. The application is required to be

submitted within 5 years. That Ist party dependent had

not submitted application within 5 years. Late Chamroolal

Yadav was employed as loader, Token No. 377(P) died on

14-6-1985. The dependents did not approach to the

management for employment. The dependent is getting

family pension. Smt. Phoolbai, widow of deceased workman

submitted application for employment in 1995. Her

application could not be considered as highly belated.

The purpose of providing employment to the dependent

of Govt. servant dying in harness in preference to anybody

else is to mitigate hardship. Such appointments are

permissible on compassionate ground as per the rules.

Management submits that as application is submitted after

10 years, It cannot be considered.

4. Considering pleadings on record, the points

which arise for my consideration and determination are as

under. My findings are recorded against each of them for

the reasons as below :—

(i)

Whether the action of the

In Affirmative

management of SECL in not

providing employment to the

dependent of Late Shri

Chamroolal Yadav is legal

and justified?

(ii) If so, to what relief the

Relief prayed by

workman is entitled to?”

dependence of

deceased

workman is

rejected.

REASONS

5. The reference relates to denial of employment on

compassionate ground to widow of Late Chamroolal.

However the 1st party dependent has not submitted

statement of claim. 1st party workman is proceeded exparte.

Management of IInd party filed Written statement

contending that the application for compassionate ground

was submitted within 5 years, rather the application was

submitted after 10 years. As per rules, application cannot

be considered. Affidavit of management’s witness I.G.

Thulsidhara Kurup is filed covering most of the contention

of the IInd party in Written Statement. His evidence

remained unchallenged as the Ist party workman failed to

cross-examine the said witness of the management. IInd

party has produced copy of Implementation Instruction

Annexure M-l. Clause 3.6 provides that :—

“Provision of employment/monetary compensation

to female dependants of workmen who die while in

service and who are declared medically unfit as per

Clause 9.4.0 above would be regulated as under.-

(i)

In case of death due to mine accident, the

female dependent would have the option to

either accept the monetary compensation of

Rs. 3000 per month of employment irrespective

of her age.

(ii)

In case of death/total permanent disablement

due to causes other than mine accident and

medical unfitness under Clause 9.4.0 (NCWA-

V), if the, female dependent is upto the age of

45 years, she will have the option either to

accept the monetary compensation of Rs. 2000/

per month or employment.

6. Document Annexure M-2 produced by

management Item No. 242.6 reads as under :—

“ It was decided that the employment for

dependent under the provision of 9.3.2 , 9.4.0

and 9.5.0 will be considered on routine basis and

those cases which are older than 5 years or more

shall be reopened for consideration on case to

case basis.

In other words cases which are older than 5 years

or more will not be considered and it can only be

reopened if there is full justification for the same.”

7. In present case, as per affidavit of management’s

witness dependent has not filed Statement of claim neither

filed any evidence. The claim of Ist party dependent is not

substantiated. For above reasons, I record my finding on

Point No.1 in Affirmative.

8. In the result, award is passed as under:-

(i)

Action of the IInd party management in not

providing employment to the dependent of Late

Shri Chamroolal Yadav is legal.

(ii) Relief claimed by dependent of deceased

workman is rejected.

R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer

4148

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ubZ fnYyh] 3 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1573-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ ,l bZ lh

,y ds çca/ra=k ds laca¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky; tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 30@2010)

dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 3&7&2013 dks çkIr

gqvk Fkk A

¹iQk- la- ,y&22012@60@2009&vkbZ vkj (lh,e&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 3rd July, 2013

S.O. 1573.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. 30/2010)

of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial

Dispute between the management of Rajendra-Navgaon

Sub Area of SECL, and their workmen, received by the

Central Government on 3-7-2013.

[ F. No. L- 22012/60/2009-IR (CM-II)]

B.M.PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

JABALPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/R/30/2010 PRESIDING OFFICER:

SHRI R. B. PATLE

The President,

Koyla Mazdoor. Sabha (HMS),

Near G.M.Office,

Dhanpuri, Shahdol ......Workman/Union

Versus

Sub Area Manager,

Rajendra Navgaon sub Area of SECL,

PO Khairaha,

Shahdol (MP) .......Management

AWARD

Passed on this 11th day of June 2013

1. As per letter dated 25-3-2010 by the

Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi,

the reference is received. The reference is made to this

Tribunal under Section-10 of I.D. Act, 1947 as per

Notification No. L-22012/60/2009-IR(CM-II). The dispute

under reference relates to:

“Whether the action of the management of M/s

SECL in imposing penalty of removal/discharge

from service on Shri Khelawan S/o Shri Mangal

w.e.f. 27-11-2006 is legal and justified? To what

relief is the claimant workman entitled for ?”

2. Ist party Union is challenging removal/

discharge from service of workman Shri Khelawan in

the dispute under reference. Even after issuing notices,

the Union has not participated in the proceeding, no

statement of claim is filed. 1st party is proceeded exparte

on 5-12-2012.

3. IInd party management also not filed Written

Statement. From conduct of the 1st party, it is clear

that the parties are not pursuing or participating in the

dispute.

4. In the result, award is passed as under :—

“Reference is disposed off as No Distpute

Award.”

5. Let the copies of the award be sent to the

Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment

as per rules.

R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 3 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1574-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ MCY;w lh

,y ds çca/ra=k ds laca¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky; tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 70@2008)

dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 03&07&2013 dks

çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹iQk- la- ,y&22012@20@2008&vkbZ vkj (lh,e&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 3rd July, 2013

S.O. 1574.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award Ref. 70/2008 of

the Cent.Govt.Indus. Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur

as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between

the management of WCL, and their workmen, received by

the Central Government on 03-07-2013.

[ F. No. L- 22012/20/2008-IR (CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

JABALPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/R/70/08

Presiding Officer : Shri R. B. PATLE

General Secretary,

Sanyukta Koyala Mazdoor Sangh(AITUC),

CRO Camp, Iklehra,

Chhindwara

...Workman/Union

Versus

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4149

Chief General Manager,

WCL, Pench Area,

PO Parasia,

Chhindwara

...Management

AWARD

Passed on the 13th day of May, 2013

1. As per letter dated 9-6-2008 by the Government

of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference

is received. The reference is made to this Tribunal

under Section 10 of I.D. Act, 1947 as per Notification

No. L-22012/20/2008-IR(CM-II). The dispute under

reference relates to:

“Whether the action of the management of M/s

WCL in dismissing Shri Arif Khan w.e.f. 23-5-2007

is legal and justified? To what relief is the

concerned workman entitled?”

2. After receiving reference, notices were issued

to the parties. 1st party workmen despite of repeated

notices issued to him did not turn up or file his

statement of claim. 1st party was proceeded ex parte

on 21-1-2011.

3. Management filed ex parte Written Statement

on 12-5-2011. It is submitted that workman was working

as Haulage Khalasi at Vishnupuri U/G Mine No. 1, he

was habitual absentee from duty. He did not show

interest in his work. Despite of it, management granted

him several opportunities to improve his performance.

1st party workman was unauthorisely absent from July

2002. His whereabouts were not known. Chargesheet

were issued to him under clause 24,26.30 of Standing

Orders. The chargesheet was sent by registered post

on address recorded in Form B register, Registered

envelope was received back unserved. The Enquiry

Officer was appointed. Shri R.K. Sinha, Sr. Personnel

Officer was appointed as Enquiry Officer, Mr. Yezdas

Sr. Under Manager Vishnupuri was appointed as

management representative. Despite of memo issued

on 10-11-06, 16-12-06, 5-1-07, Ist party workman could

not be served. Public notice was issued in Delhi Raj

Express dated 1-2-07. The enquiry was conducted

against 1st party workman. Enquiry Officer recorded

finding and charges were proved. As per his

unauthorized absence, services of 1st party workman

were terminated as per order dated 21-05-07. IInd party

submits that termination of 1st party workman after

holding Departmental Enquiry is legal and prays for

rejection of claim of 1st party workman.

4. Considering pleadings on record, the points

which arise for my consideration and determination are

as under. My findings are recorded against each of

them for the reasons as below :—

(i)

Whether the termination

of Ist party workman

In Affirmative

Shri Arif Khan w.e.f.

23-5-2007 by the

management is legal ?

(ii) If so, to what relief the

As per final order

workman is entitled to ?”

REASONS

5. Present reference is directed for adjudication

of legality of termination of Ist party workman.

No statement of claim has been filed by workman. IInd

party filed Written Statement and contended that

unauthorized absence of workman was proved in

enquiry proceeding therefore services of Ist party

workman are terminated. Affidavit of evidence of IInd

party witness Shri R.S. Prasad is produced. He has

stated most of the facts pleaded in Written Statement

of IInd party. It is submitted that despite of repeated

notices and memos, Ist party remained absent in the

enquiry. From evidence in enquiry proceedings, charges

of unauthrized absence against workman are proved. In

pursuance of the report of the Enquiry Officer, services

of Ist party workman are terminated from 23-5-07. The

evidence of witness of IInd party gone unchallenged.

Ist party workman failed to participate in the reference

proceeding, failed to cross-examine the management’s

witness. He also not filed statement of claim.

Considering the evidence on record, as services of Ist

party workman are terminated for unauthorized absence

proved in the Enquiry Proceeding, action of the IInd

party is legal. Accordingly I record my finding on

Point No. 1 in Affirmative.

6. In the result, award is passed as under :—

(1) Action of the IInd party management in

terminating the services of 1st party workman

Shri Arif Khan w.e.f. 23-5-2007 is legal.

(2) Relief prayed by 1st party workman is rejected.

R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 3 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1575-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ , ,l

vkbZ ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky; tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 183@2001)

dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 03&07&2013 dks

çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹iQk- la- ,y& 42012@70@2001&vkbZ vkj (lh,e&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

4150

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 3rd July, 2013

S.O. 1575.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 183/

2001) of the Cent.Govt.Indus. Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,

Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute

between the management of Archaeological Survey of

India, and their workman, which was received by the Central

Government on 03-07-2013.

[ F. No. L- 42012/70/2001-IR (CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

JABALPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/R/183/2001

Presiding Officer : Shri R. B. PATLE

Shri Shivraj Singh,

S/o Pokhan Singh,

C/o Mahesh Prasad Dubey,

Postal Deptt. Chanderi,

Guna

...Workman

Versus

Asstt. Superindendent,

Archaeological Survey of India,

Archaeological Museum,

Singhpur Palace,

P.O. Chanderi,

Guna

..Management

AWARD

Passed on this 12th day of June, 2013

1. As per letter dated 27-11-2001 by the

Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi,

the reference is received. The reference is made to this

Tribunal under Section 10 of I.D. Act, 1947 as per

Notification No. L-42012/70/2001-IR(CM-II). The dispute

under reference relates to:

“Whether the action of the management of Asstt.

Supdt. Archaeologist, Archaeological Survey of

India, Chanderi in terminating the services of Shri

Shivraj Singh S/o Pokhan Singh w.e.f. 1-1-1996 is

justified ? If not, to what relief the workman is

entitled for ?”

2. After receiving reference, notices were issued

to the parties. Workman submitted statement of claim

at page 4/1 to 4/3. The case of Ist party workman is

that he was initially engaged on 1-7-94 on daily wages

against vacant post of watchman in regular

establishment after continuously working for more than

six months with the satisfaction of the management.

His name was sponsored from Employment Exchange,

selection process was undertaken, he was interviewed

by the management on 20-2-95. He was found suitable

for regular appointment. However he was appointed on

temporary basis from 21-2-95. After working for 544

days including holidays from 1-7-94 to 31-12-95, the

services were terminated from 1-1-1996. It is submitted

by workman that he was not paid retrenchment

compensation, no notice was issued to him, salary in

lieu of notice period was not paid to him. Shri Salim,

Vijay, Pappu, Bhallavi, Rajesh and Prakash were engaged

as watchman after his termination. He was not given

opportunity for re-employment. That the junior workmen

Vishram Singh, Indrapal and Salim working on daily

wages were inducted into regular establishment. The

Seniority list of daily wage workers was not published

on notice board at the time of his termination. He

submits that since his termination, he was required to

borrow money from his friends and relatives. His family

members are supporting for his basic necessity of life.

He is not gainfully employed. It is submitted that

termination of his service is in violation of Section 25-

F of I.D. Act, Rule-77 of Central Rules, 1957. He prays

for reinstatement with consequential benefits.

3. IInd party managment failed to file Written

Statement. As such proceeded ex parte on 7-9-07.

4. Considering pleadings on record, the points

which arise for my consideration and determination are

as under. My findings are recorded against each of

them for the reasons as below :—

(i)

Whether the termination

of the services of

In Negative

Shri Shivraj Singh

S/o Pokhan Singh

w.e.f. 1-1-1996 by

the Asstt. Supdt.

Archaeologist,

Archaeological Survey

of India, Chanderi is

justified ?

(ii) If so, to what relief the

As per final order

workman is entitled to ?”

REASONS

5. Workman is challenging termination of his

services from 1-1-96. That his services were terminated

in violation of Section 25-F, G & H. His juniors were

retained in service. He was not given notice, no

retrenchment compensation was paid. Pay in lieu of

notice was not paid to him. All those facts are covered

in affidavit of his evidence filed on 19-5-06. IInd party

management of Archaeeological survey of India failed

to participate in the proceeding. The evidence of

workman gone unchallenged. I find no reason to

disbelieve his evidence. The workman has produced

zerox copies of documents with list dated 27-12-2010.

However he has not rendered any of those documents

in his affidavit of evidence.

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4151

6. A bunch of citation is submitted on behalf of

workman. Ratio held in bunch of citation relates to

what is Industry as held in AIR-1978-Supreme Court

548(1). As there is no denial by the IInd party, the

issue doesnot arise. Therefore ratio held in all citations

in bunch submitted on his behalf needs no detailed

discussion. From unchallenged evidence of workman, it

is clear that he had completed 240 days continuous

service preceding his termination from 1-1-1996. His

services are terminated without giving retrenchment

compensation, not issuing notice or pay in salary in

lieu of notice. The list of retrenched employees were

not displayed on notice, junior employees were retained.

Thus the termination of service of workman is illegal

for violation of Sections 25-F, G & H of I.D.Act. I

accordingly record my finding on Point No. 1.

7. In the result, award is passed as under :—

(i) The action of the management of Asstt. Supdt.

Archaeologist, Archaeological Survey of India,

chanderi in terminating the services of Shri

Shivraj Singh S/o Pokhan Singh w.e.f. 1-1-1996

is illegal.

(ii) IInd party is directed to reinstate Shri Shivraj

Singh, S/o Shri Pokhan Singh with 50% back

wages.

R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 3 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1576-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ MCY;w lh

,y ds çca/ra=k ds laca¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky; tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 109@1993)

dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 03&07&2013 dks

çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹iQk- la- ,y&22012@44@1993&vkbZ vkj (lh,e&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 3rd July, 2013

S.O. 1576.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 109/

1993) of the Cent.Govt.Indus. Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,

Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute

between the management of WCL, and their workmen,

which was received by the Central Government on 03-07-

2013.

[ F. No. L- 22012/44/1993-IR (CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

JABALPUR

No. CGIT/LC/R/109/93

Presiding Officer : Shri R. B. PATLE

General Secretary,

M.P.K.K.M.P (HMS),

PO Junnardeo,

Distt. Chhindwara (MP)

...Workman/

Union

Versus

Manager,

WCL, Rakhikol Colliery,

Kanhan Area,

PO Rakhikol, Distt. Chhindeara (MP) ...Management

AWARD

Passed on this 13th day of June, 2013

1. As per letter dated 7-6-97 by the Government

of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference

is received. The reference is made to this Tribunal

under Section-10 of I.D. Act, 1947 as per Notification

No. L-22012/44/93-IR(CM-II). The dispute under

reference relates to:

“Whether the action of the Manager, Rakhikol

Colliery of WCL, Kanhan Area, PO Rakhikol Distt.

Chhindwara (MP) in dismissing the services of

Shri Bishram S/o Lotan, Casual Temp. D.P.R. w.e.f.

23-10-88 is justified ? If not, to what relief the

concerned workman is entitled to ?”

2. After receiving reference, notices were issued

to the parties. After notice, state of claim is submitted

by the Union at Pages 3. It is case of Union that

workman Shri Bisram Adivasi Truck Loader was

permanent worker, the work was of permanent nature.

He was working since 20-3-84. His work was neat and

clean. As and when management finds its manpower

surplus, the Adivasi and Harijans are the first target

due to illiteracy and poverty. That the management

put tham for her work and usually not provided full

scale in the month. That the services were verbally

terminated from 23-10-88 illegally. It is prayed that

workman be reinstated with back wages.

3. IInd party filed Written Statement at Page

5/1 to 5/4. IInd party submits that Bisram S/o Lotan

was casual employee, had not completed 190/240 day

attendance in any of the calendar year while in service

4152

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

of Rakhikol colliery. The workman was continuously

absent from duty from year 1987. For such absence

without permission, without intimation from authorities,

chargesheet was issued to him for unauthorized

absence. Enquiry of unauthorized absence was proved

beyond doubt. He was issued notice to appear and

participate in the enquiry. However the workman failed

to appear before enquiry officer. That the unauthorized

absence from duty is proved misconduct. As per report

of the Enquiry Officer for unauthorized absence from

1987 punishment of dismissal was imposed. The Ist

party is not entitled to relief prayed by him.

4. Ist party workman submitted rejoinder at page

8/1 to 8/3. His earlier contentions are reiterated that

services of workman are illegally terminated in violation

of provision of I.D. Act. That he had completed 240

days continuous service during each of the year .

5. The enquiry was held valid as per order dated

1-4-2011. The following points which arise for my

consideration and determination are as under. My

findings are recorded against each of them for the

reasons as below :—

(i)

Whether the charge of un-

In Affirmative

authorized absence against

workman is proved from

evidence in the Enquiry

proceeding.

(ii)

Whether the punishment of

In Affirmative

dismissal from service is just

and proper ?

(iii)

If so, to what relief the work-

Relief prayed

man is entitled to?”

by workman

is rejected.

REASONS

6. As discussed above as per order dated

1-4-2011, the enquiry held against workman is found

legal and proper. Workman has not adduced evidence

on other issues. Record of enquiry Proceedings is

produced by management with list at Page 16. The

evidence in enquiry shows that workman was absent

in the year 1987 without any intimation. At the time of

argument, learned counsel for management Mr. Shashi

argued that Coal Mine is essential industry. In absence

of the employee without intimation affects the working

of the mine. The unauthorized absence of workman is

proved from evidence in enquiry. The workman had

not participated in the enquiry. The misconduct is

proved from evidence. No evidence is adduced about

propriety of punishment of dismissal. I donot find

reason to interfere in the punishment. For the above

reason, I record my finding in Point No. 1, 2 in

Affirmative.

7. In the result, award is passed as under :—

(i) The action of the Manager, Rakhikol Colliery

of WCL, Kanhan Area, PO Rakhikol Distt.

Chhindwara (MP) in dismissing the services

of Shri Bishram S/o Lotan, Casual Temp.

D.P.R. w.e.f. 23-10-88 is justified.

(ii) Relief prayed by Ist party workman is rejected.

R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 4 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1577-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj LVsV cSad vkWiQ

ifV;kyk ds çca/ra=k ds laca¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds

chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky; paMhx<+&1 ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 2@2008)

dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 01&07&2013 dks

çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹iQk- la- ,y&12012@06@2008&vkbZ vkj (ch&1)º

lqefr ldykuh] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 4th July, 2013

S.O. 1577.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award Ref. 2/2008

of the Cent. Govt. Indus. Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,

No. 1, Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure, in the

industrial dispute between the management of State Bank

of Patiala, and their workmen, which was received by the

Central Government on 01-07-2013.

[ F. No. L- 12012/06/2008-IR (B-I)]

SUMATI SAKLANI, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI S.P. SINGH, PRESIDING OFFICER,

CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIVUNAL-CUM-

LABOUR COURT-I, CHANDIGARH.

Case No. ID 2/2008.

Shri Dalel Singh Dahiya, House No.118, Behind Labour

Office, Bishan Saroop Colony, Panipat.

... Workman

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4153

Versus

(1) The Deputy General Manager, State Bank of

Patiala, Zonal Office, SCO-7, Sector-5, Panchkula

( Haryana)

(2) The Assistant General Manager-II, State Bank

of Patiala, SCO 9-10, Sector-25, HUDA, Panipat.

.....Management

Appearances :

For the workman :

Shri V. Sharma Advocate

For the management :

Shri S. K. Gupta Advocate

AWARD

Passed on 21-05-2013

Central Govt. vide letter No. L-12012/06/2008-IR

(B-I) dated 11-4-2008 has referred the following dispute

to this Tribunal for adjudication :

“Whether the action of the Asstt. General Manager,

State Bank of Patiala, Panipat Branch in imposing

penalty of removal from service of Sri Dalel Singh

Dahiya Ex-Head Cashier ‘E’ w.e.f 30-10-2005 is just,

fair and legal? If not, to what relief the workman is

entitled to and from which date ?”

2. The case of the workman as enumerated in claim

statement is that he joined the management of State Bank

of Patiala as Clerk-cum-Cashier, upgraded as Head Cashier

Category-E in the year 2002 and posted at Safidon Branch

of the bank. Suddenly he was placed under suspension by

leveling the charge on various lapses allegedly committed

by him during the posting at extension counter Municipal

Committee Safidon Branch. He was served with charge-

sheet which is as under :—

“While posted at Ext. Counter, Municipal

Committee Safidon of Safidon Branch you are alleged to

have committed certain acts of misconducts, which are

prejudiced to the bank’s interests, for which you are served

upon the following charge-sheet :—

Sh. Raj Singh Malik a customer of the Ext. Counter

made the following deposits at cash counter handled by

you at the Ext. counter Municipal Committee, Safidon. You

have given the counter folio slips of these deposits to the

Customer by putting bank’s receipts stamps under your

intitials and also made entries in his pass book, but you did

not deposit the amount in the Saving Bank a/c No. 11900-

15247 (New a/c No. 55109779290) of Sh. Raj Singh Malik

a customer maintaining saving bank a/c at the Ext. Counter,

Municipal Committee Safidon. The said money was

pocketed by you and defrauded the customer. Besides

pocketing the money, you tarnished the image of the bank.

The details of these deposits are mentioned hereunder.

Sr. Date of Deposit

Amount

1.

14-4-2004

4800.00

2.

16-7-2004

83000

3.

3-8-2004

200000

4.

18-8-2004

4800

5.

28-9-2004

60000

6.

14-10-2004

23000

7.

14-12-2004

4800

8.

22-12-2004

120000

9.

17-7-2005

200000

10. 28-7-2005

5700

11. 21-6-2005

4800

12. 16-9-2005

5700

13. 16-9-2005

120000

14. 29-2-2004

32000

You were called upon to explain you position on

10-10-2005 for the above irregularities, but you did not

submit the reply to the explanation despite you were

allowed to pursue the record of the branch, as requested

by you and you confirmed vide your acknowledgement

dated nil having pursued the record on 31-10-2005.

Thus aforesaid acts amounts to Gross Misconduct

in terms of Clause 5(j) of Memorandum of Settlement on

Disciplinary Action Procedure for workmen signed

between Indian Banks Association and The workmen

Unions at Mumbai on 10th April, 2002. You are advised to

submit your reply to the aforesaid charge sheet within

seven days from the date of receipt thereof failing which it

will be presumed that you have nothing to say and the

matter shall be proceeded with further.”

3. Regular departmental proceedings were held.

After conducting of the inquiry the workman was

provided with the copy of the inquiry report and was

served with show cause notice proposing the penalty of

major punishment, i.e. removal from service with

superannuation benefit. He was also granted personal

hearing by the disciplinary authority as well as by the

appellate authority. Appellate authority confirmed the

punishment of removal from service with superannuation

benefit. It is pleaded by the workman that appellate

authority rejected the appeal of the workman by non-

speaking order. It is pleaded by the workman that charge-

4154

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

sheet served upon him was without any list of documents

and list of witness and without any photocopy of the

document. It is further pleaded that allegations have

been levelled directly and in a pre-judged manner. He was

not allowed opportunity to file the defence statement. It is

further pleaded that findings of the Inquiry Officer are

based upon a case of no evidence and material documents

were considered by the Inquiry Officer behind the back of

the workman. Findings of the Inquiry Officer are not only

arbitrary and perverse but the same are result of distortion

of fact for the purpose of misleading the disciplinary

authority. It is a case of double jeopardy also. The findings

are without any assessment of evidence on the record of

inquiry. Crucial witnesses have not been examined and

therefore punishment order is liable to be vitiated. It is

further pleaded that order of removal from service is

unreasoned, non-speaking, arbitrary and perverse. The

copy of the proceedings recorded at the time of personal

hearing was not provided to the workman. It is pleaded

that the inquiry Officer conducted the inquiry against the

principle of natural justice and against the well-settled

principle of law. The workman was not provided with

opportunity of defence-during inquiry. It is prayed that

inquiry may be vitiated and order passed on the basis of

inquiry may be set aside and workman may be ordered to

be reinstated in service with full back wages.

4. The management filed written statement stating

there in that while the workman was posted at Safidon

Branch of the Bank a customer named Raj Singh Malik

made various deposits at cash counter. The workmen, given

the counter folio slips of the deposits'to the customer by

putting bank receipt stamp under his signature in token of

receipts of the amount and also made current entries in the

passbook of the customer. But the workman did not deposit

the amount in the Saving Bank Account of customer and

pocketed and misappropriated the same as many as

14 entries of the various amounts have been given in the

charge-sheet. When this misappropriation came to the

notice of the bank, workman was issued charge-sheet but

the workman preferred not to reply the same. Inquiry

proceedings were initiated. The Bank conducted the inquiry

in a fair and proper manner and in accordance with the

principles of natural justice. Disciplinary authority after

going through the inquiry report and evidence on record

inflicted the punishment of removal from service vide order

dated 30-6-2006 on the workman. Thus the management

adopted all fair and proper means to conduct the inquiry.

He was afforded full and proper opportunity to give his

defente and to prove his innocence. In view of the serious

misconduct committed by the workman the punishment of

removal from service was inflicted. It is also submitted by

the management that in case this Hon’ble Court comes to

the conclusion that inquiry has not been conducted in a

fair and proper manner and at any stage the principle of

natural justice has been violated during the inquiry

proceeding. In that eventuality the management reserve

its right to prove the charges before this Court. On merits

also it is pleaded by the management that inquiry was

conducted on various dates and the workman was given

full opportunity to prove his innocence but the punishment

was awarded after detailed and exhaustive inquiry. Therefore

the workman is not entitled for any relief and the reference

may be answere against the workman.

5. Replication was filed by the workman reiterating

the same contents as made in the claim statement. Workman

also placed on record his affidavit on the same pattern as

that of the claim statement.

6. My learned predecessor heard the arguments on

fairness of inquiry and vide order dated 22-7-2010 held as

under :—

“Thus I am of the view that enquiry was held in a fair

and proper manner. There has been no statutory lapse

while conducting the enquiry and there has also

been no violation of principle of natural justice while

conducting the enquiry by the enquiry officer.

There is a difference in conducting any enquiry in a

fair and proper manner and the decision making of the

enquiry officer and the disciplinary authority. There may

be cases where enquiry might have been conducted in a

fair and proper manner but the decision making i.e.; proving

of the charge by enquiry officer, may suffer with some

perversity. The enquiry officer might have taken into

consideration the evidence which was not on record or

has not considered the evidence which was not on record.

There may be the possibility of perversity in holding the

charge proved. For all these circumstances, it is mandatory

to afforded the opportunities to both of the parties on the

issue of perversity in decision making and on quantum of

punishment. Thus, both of the parties were afforded the

opportunity for adducing evidence on the following

issues :—

(1) The perversity in decision making of the enquiry

officer and the disciplinary authority, if any?

(2) The quantum of punishment.

Both of the parties are afforded the opportunity for

adducing evidence on the abovementioned issues on

10-8-2010. Parties be informed."

7. Now the limited question before this Tribunal is

whether there is any perversity in decision making of the

Inquiry Officer and the disciplinary authority and on

quantum of punishment. Learned counsel for the workman

during arguments submitted that the inquiry officer has

not called the complainant to prove the charges of

pocketing the money and misappropriating of the amount

as mentioned in the charge sheet. It is submitted by the

learned counsel for the workman that as the complainant

was not called therefore the workman was greatly

prejudiced by not calling the complainant before the Inquiry

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4155

Officer and he was also not subjected to cross-examination

by the workman on the charges. Learned counsel for the

workman also submitted that as crucial witness was not

examined therefore it is a fit case where the punishment of

removal which is harsh punishment cannot be imposed on

the workman. In support of his contention he has also

relied on judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court 1999 (1) SCT

303 Kuldeep Singh Vs. Commissioner of Police and 2005

(3) SCT 407 P.Erajan, lnspector of Police Vs. Deputy

Inspector General of Police,Trunelveli Range, a judgment

of Hon'ble Madras High Court to support his contentions.

It is prayed by the learned counsel for the workman that as

original complaint was not brought on record and crucial

witness was not produced, therefore, it is a fit case where

the punishment of removal from service can be substituted.

It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the

workman on quantum of punishment that removal from

service is harsh punishment and as the charges were not

proved complainant was not produced for cross-

examination by the workman, therefore, the punishment of

removal from service is very harsh and the workman is

entitled to reinstatement in service with full back wages

and other service benefits.

8. On the other hand the learned counsel for the

management submitted that the limited question before

this Tribunal is to see any perversity in decision making of

the Inquiry Officer and disciplinary authority and quantum

of punishment as per order dated 22-7-2010. From the

inquiry proceeding, not even a single instance has been

quoted by the workman that the Inquiry Officer has not

afforded opportunity to the workman. From the inquiry

preceding it is revealed that the workman was given

opportunity of defence and he was allowed to file reply to

the charge sheet but workman chose not to file the reply to

the charge sheet. Inquiry Officer was appointed with due

knowledge of the workman. Prosecution witnesses were

examined wherein the workman was allowed to cross-

examine the witnesses of the management. The workman

was also allowed to lead his defence during inquiry and,

there is not a single instance to show that the Inquiry

Officer was biased. The inquiry was conducted in

accordance with the principles of natural justice and he

was allowed full opportunity of defence Similarly the

disciplinary authority before inflicting the punishment

given show cause notice also given the personal hearing

to the workman and after completing all the formalities of

principle of natural justice inflicted the punishment of

removal from service which is not a swear one. Banking

institution runs on the faith of the public and the workman

was served with charge sheet as many as for pocketing the

money 14 times deposited by the customer of the bank.

He misappropriated the amount as proved from the inquiry

of eight transactions which is a very serious offence and

the punishment of removal from the service is very lesser

punishment. Rather the workman was to be given strict

punishment of dismissal from service so that other

employees may not indulge in such practice. The name of

the institution was badly affected by the act and conduct

of the workman and the workman is not entitled for any

relief whatsoever. The learned counsel for the management

also relied on the case laws 2006 (3) SLR 184 State Bank of

India an another Vs. Bela Bagchi and others, AIR 2000 SC

3028 State Bank of India Vs. Tarun Kumar Banerjee, 2009

(4) RSJ SC 444 UP State Road Tansport Corporation Vs.

Nanhe Lal Kushwaha, 1997 RSJ 692( Punjab & Haryana)

State of Punjab Vs. Nazar Singh and another 1997(3) RSJ

369 SC Punjab Dairy Development Corporation Ltd. and

another Vs. Kaka Singh, 2005(4) RSJ 636 (S.C.) V. Ramana

Vs. A.P.S.R.T.C. and others and 2007(3) RSJ page I.

9. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and

also gone through the case law submitted by both the

parties.

10. On 22-7-2010, the then presiding officer framed

the following Issues :

(1) The perversity in decision making of the enquiry

officer and the disciplinary authority, if any?

(2) The quantum of punishment.

11. From the perusal of the enquiry report it is clear

that enquiry officer found that the charges are partly

proved. Enquiry Officer while giving his findings clearly

mentioned that the charges to the extent marked as Ex.P-

6(1). Ex. P-7(1), Ex. P-8(1), Ex. P-9(1), Ex. P-l0(1), Ex. P-ll (1),

Ex. P-12 (1), Ex. P-13 (1), Ex. P-14 (1), Ex. P-15(1), Ex. P-16 (1),

Ex. P-17 (1), Ex. P-18 (1) were issued by the EPA as during

the enquiry the workman never denied having done so. It

is also proved that workman made the entries in his own

hand in the pass book of Shri Raj Singh Malik. Enquiry

Officer also observed that the charges not proved to the

extent that the entries dated 29-2-2004 for Rs. 32000/- and

workman is nothing to do with it being computerized

entry. The entry dated 17-7-2005 for Rs. Two lakhs is

concerned being Sunday which may not be a working day

in the normal course and BPO has not produced any

evidence to prove that it was a working day. The entry

dated 14-4-2004, 18-8-2004, 14-12-2004 and 21-6-2005 for

Rs. 4800/- each entry dated 28-7-2005 and 16-9-2005 for

Rs. 5700 each represent the cheques deposited by the

complainant and these are likely to be deposited after

collection. Thus from the perusal of the enquiry report, it is

clear that enquiry officer was not biased against the

workman nor any perversity occasioned.

12. It is pertinent to mention here that workman

himself examined as WWl and in cross-examination

workman stated that he cross-examined the witnesses of

the bank in departmental enquiry and enquiry officer given

him the opportunity of defence but he choose not to adduce

any defence evidence in enquiry. After supplying of the

copy of the enquiry report, disciplinary authority as well

as appellate authority provided him personal hearing. Thus

4156

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

the workman failed to point out any perversity in decision

making by the enquiry officer, disciplinary authority and

appellate authority. The case laws cited by the learned

counsel for the workman have no application in fact and

circumstances of the case. In fact, one of the case law cited

by the learned counsel for the management i.e. 2006 (3)

SLR 184 State Bank of India an another Vs. Bela Bagchi

and others apply to the facts and circumstances of the

case in hand being similar facts and circumstances in which

the punishment of dismissal from service was upheld by

the Hon’ble Supreme Court.

13. Thus it is held that there is no perversity at any

stage committed by the authorities of the bank and the

enquiry was conducted in a fair and proper manner adhering

to the settled principles of natural justice.

14. As regards quantum of punishment is concerned,

in view of the proved charges of misconduct of

misappropriation, the workman pocketed the money of a

customer and tarnished the image of the bank. The bank

lost confidence in him. Moreover the punishment of removal

from service with superannuation benefits is commensurate

with the proved misconduct of the workman and no

interference is called for in the punishment by this Tribunal.

15. In view of the discussion above, it is held that the

action of the Assistant General Manager, State Bank of

Patiala, Panipat Branch in imposing the penalty of removal

from service of Shri Dalel Singh Dahiya Ex-Head Cashier

'E' w.e.f. 30-10-2005 is just, fair and legal and the workman

is not entitled to any relief. The reference is answered

accordingly. A soft copy as well as hard copy be sent to

the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for

publication.

Chandigarh.

21-05-2013

S. P. SINGH, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 4 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1578-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj phiQ tujy

eSustj] ,e-Vh-,u-,y- ds çca/ra=k ds laca¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds

deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh;

ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k ua- 1] ubZ fnYyh ds iapkV (lanHkZ

la[;k 38@2013) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks

26&6&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹iQk- la- ,y&42025@07@2013&vkbZvkj(Mh;w)º

tksgu rksiuks] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 4th July, 2013

S.O. 1578.—In pursaunce of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central

Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1,

New Delhi (Filed under Section 33-A in the matter of

Complaint arising out of Ref. No. 38/2013) as shown in the

Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the Chief

General Manager, MTNL and their workman, which was

received by the Central Goverment on 26-06-2013.

[ F. No. L-42025/07/2013-IR(DU)]

JOHAN TOPNO, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE DR. R. K. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER,

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL

NO. 1, KARKARDOOMA COURTS COMPLEX,

DELHI

I.D. NO. 38/2013

The Chief General Manager,

MTNL, Khurshid Lal Bhawan,

New Delhi-110050. ......Applicant Management

Versus

The General Secretary,

MTNL Mazdoor Sangh,

D-14, Telegraph Square

Doctors Lane, Gole Market

New Delhi-110001 .......Respondent Union

AWARD

Pursuant to its decision to set up Mahanagar

Telephone Nigam Ltd. (in short the Nigam), a Public Sector

Corporation, Department of Telecommunications (DOT),

Ministry of Communications, Government of India, vide

order dated 18-03-1996 directed that on commencement of

operations of the Nigam with effect from 01-04-1986, the

staff of Delhi and Bombay telephone districts working

within the jurisdiction of Union Territory of Delhi and

Bombay, New Bombay and Thane Municipal areas will be

deemed to be transferred on deputation to the Nigam on

the existing terms and conditions without any deputation

allowance for a maximum period of five years and would

be manned by terms and conditions applicable to them

prior to formation of the Nigam. All employees of DOT

(Group C & D) on deemed deputation with Nigam were

given an option to either to opt for service of the Nigam or

revert back to their parent cadre. Employees who opted

for service of the Nigam were absorbed from 01-11-1998

onwards. Rules and regulations for service conditions

applicable to the employees of the Nigam were made

applicable to such employees.

2. While working for DOT, the employees used to

contribute towards CGHS and avail medical facilities from

CGHS dispensary as well as empanelled hospitals in

cashless mode. The Nigam introduce Indoor Medical

Scheme through M/s. ICICI Lombard General Insurance in

pursuance of settlement arrived at with majority union

MTNL Delhi and Mumbai, during the course of conciliation

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4157

proceedings. The said scheme was continued for

5-6 months. Later on the insurance company backed out

after paying back the premium for the balance period.

3. Health Insurance Scheme was then handed over

by the Nigam to United India Assurance Company, and a

sum of Rs. 45 crore was released to the Insurance

Company. The said action was taken by the Nigam by

taking a unilateral decision. Aggrieved by the said act, the

MTNL Staff Union (Class III and IV) (in short the union)

raised a demand for reverting back to the existing indoor

facilities. Since the demand was not acceded to, an

industrial dispute was raised by the union before the

Conciliation Officer. Since the Nigam contested the claim,

conciliation proceedings ended into a failure. On

consideration of failure report, submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, the appropriate Government referred

the dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication, vide order

No. L-40011/14/2011-IR(DU), New Delhi dated 8-5-2012,

with following terms :

“Whether the action of the management of MTNL,

New Delhi in extending the medical facilities to its

employees through an insurance company instead of

continuing with the existing indoor facilities is legal and

justified? If not, to what relief the employees of MTNL are

entitled to?

4. Claim statement was filed by the union pleading

that the Nigam attempted to wriggle out of the on going

medical policy formulated on the strength of wage

agreement dated 11-05-2010, without deliberating with the

union and purchased Health Insurance policies from the

United India Assurance Company for non-executive

employees of the Nigam. It was claimed that the act of the

Nigam in not taking the union into confidence tantamounts

to breach of memorandum of settlement dated 11-05-2010.

5. Claim was demurred by the Nigam pleading that

the claim is not maintainable as the Tribunal has no

jurisdiction to entertain it, since the claimant is asking for

recalling/quashing of circular No. MR/Circular/2008-09/

35 dated 15-03-2011, vide which circular No. MTNL/Co/

Pers.med.ins.we 2011/ 622 dated 09-03-2011 was

implemented and circulated after consultation with the

union, in the meeting held on 20-02-2011. The Nigam is

under an obligation to work out indoor medical facility

through insurance, which intention was reiterated in the

wage agreement singned by Delhi and Mumbai unit of the

union and the management,during the course of

conciliation proceedings. There was no stay against the

Nigam for handing over health insurance scheme to M/s.

United India Assurance Company Ltd. and releasing of

Rs. 45 crore to the insurance company. the CGHS scheme

was available to the employees till the insurance scheme

was not launched.

6. During pendency of adjudication process, an

application was moved by the Nigam, under section 33(2)

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (in short the Act)

detailing therein that it has launched a scheme dated

10-03-2011 in comformity with the wage agreement dated

11-05-2010. Existing two years period, as per the said

insurance policy, is going to expire on 10-03-2012. Nigam

wants approval of their action of implementation of Health

Insurance Policy for 11-03-2012 and onwards under

section 33(1) of the said Act. The application so moved,

was registered as an industrial dispute.

7. Section 33 of the Act bars alteration in conditions

of service “prejudicial to the workman concerned in the

dispute and punishment of discharge of dismissal when

either is connected with pendentelite industrial dispute

“save with the permission of the authorities before which

the proceedings is pending” or where the discharge of

dismissal is for any misconduct not connected with the

pendentelite industrial dispute without the “approval of

such authority”.

Prohibition contained in Section 33 of the Act is

two fold. On one hand, they are designed to protect the

workman concerned during the course of industrial

conciliation, arbitration and adjudication, against

employers’s harassment and victimization, on account of

their having raised the industrial dispute or their

continuing the pending proceedings and on the other.,

they seek to maintain status quo by prescribing

management conduct which may give rise to “fresh

dispute” which further exacerbate the already strained

relations betweer I employer and the workman. Where

industrial disputes are pendentelite before an authority

mentioned in the section, it was thought necessary that

such disputes should be conciliated or adjudicated upon

by the authority in a peaceful atmosphere, undisturbed

by any subsequent causes for bitterness or

unpleasantness. To achieve this object, a ban has been

imposed upon the employer exercising his common law,

statutory or contractual right to terminate the services of

his employees according to contract or the provisions of

law governing such service. The ordinary right of the

employer to alter the terms of his employees' services to

their prejudice or to terminate their services under the

general law governing contract of employment, has been

banned subject to certain conditions. This ban, therefore,

is designed to restrict the interference of the general rights

and liabilities of the parties under the ordinary law within

the limits truly necessary for accomplishing the object of

those provisions. Anxiety to know about ban on the right

of the employer, persuades me to reproduce the provisions

of section 33 of the Act thus:

"33. Conditions of service, etc., to remain unchanged

under certain circumstances during pendency of

proceedings. -( 1) During the pendency of any

conciliation proceeding before a conciliation officer

or a Board or of any proceeding before an arbitrator

or a Labour Court or Tribunal or National Tribunal

in respect of an industrial dispute, no employer

shall.—

(a) in regard to any matter connected with the

dispute, alter, to the prejudice of the workmen

4158

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

concerned in such dispute, the conditions of service

applicable to them immediately before the

commencement of such proceeding; or

(b) for any misconduct connected with the dispute,

discharge or punish, whether by dismissal or

otherwise, any workman concerned in such dispute.

Save with the express permission in writing of the

authority before which the proceeding is pending.

(2) During the pendency of any such proceeding in

respect of an industrial dispute, the employer may,

in accordance with standing orders applicable to a

workman concerned in such dispute or, where there

are no such standing orders, in accordance with the

terms of the contract, whether express or implied,

between him and the workman-

(a) alter, in regard to any matter not connected with

the dispute, the conditions of service applicable to

that workman immediately before the commencement

of such proceeding; or

(b) for any misconduct not connected with the

dispute, discharge or punish, whether by dismissal

or otherwise, that workman:

Provided that no such workman shall be discharged

or dismissed, unless he has been paid wages for

one month and an application has been made by the

employer to the authority before which the

proceeding is pending for approval of the action

taken by the employer.

(3) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-

section (2), no employer shall, during the pendency

of any such proceeding in respect of an industrial

dispute, take any action against any protected

workman concerned in such dispute -

(a) by altering, to the prejudice of such protected

workman, the conditions of service applicable to

him immediately before the commencement of such

proceeding; or

(b) by discharging or punishing, whether any

dismissal or otherwise, such protected workman,

save with the express permission in writing of the

authority before which the proceeding is pending.

Explanation.—For the purposes of this sub-section,

a "protected workman", in relation to an

establishment, means a workman who, being a

member of the executive or other office bearer of a

registered trade union connected with the

establishment, is recognized as such in accordance

with rules made in this behalf.

(4) In every establishment, the number of workmen

to be recognized as protected workmen for the

purposes of sub-section (3) shall be one per cent of

the total number of workmen employed therein

subject to a minimum number of five protected

workmen and a maximum number of one hundred

protected workmen and for the aforesaid purpose,

the appropriate Government may make rules

providing for the distribution of such protected

workmen among various trade unions, if any,

connected with the establishment and the manner

in which the workmen may be chosen and recognized

as protected workmen.

(5) Where an employer makes an application to a

conciliation officer, Board, an arbitrator, a Labour

Court, Tribunal or National Tribunal under the

proviso to sub-section (2) for approval of the action

taken by him, the authority concerned shall, without

delay, hear such application and pass, within a period

of three months from the date of receipt of such

application, such order in relation thereto as it deems

fit.

Provided that where any such authority considers it

necessary or expedient so to do, it may, for reasons

to be recorded in writing, extend such period by

such further period as it may think fit.

Provided further that no proceedings before any

such authority shall lapse merely on the ground that

any period specified in this sub-section had expired

without such proceedings being completed.

8. As noted above sub-sections (1) and (2) are

designed for different purposes since sub-section (1)

applies to the proposition when the employer wants to

alter service conditions of the workman to his prejudice in

regard to any matter connected with the dispute or for any

misconduct connected with the dispute, in that situation

he is obliged to seek prior permission in writing of the

authority before whom the dispute is pending and in a

case where the employer wants to alter service conditions

of a workman in regard to a matter not connected with the

dispute or for any misconduct not connected with the

dispute, in that situation he is obliged to seek approval of

the order under sub-section (2) of the aforesaid section.

When an employer violates the provisions of sub-section

(1) or sub-section (2) of section 33 of the Act, an instant

remedy is provided to the workman by the provisions of

section 33A of the Act. In other words, where an employer

has contravened the provisions of section 33, the

aggrieved workman has been given the' option to make a

complaint in writing, to the authority before which an

industrial dispute is pending, with which the aggrieved

workman is concerned. The complaint of such

contravention can be made not to the adjudicating

authorities, but to the conciliatory authority also. If a

complaint is made to a conciliatory authority, viz. a

Conciliation Officer or a Board of Conciliation, clause (a)

of section 33 A of the act authorizes a Conciliation Officer

or the Board to take such complaint into account in

bringing about a settlement of the complained dispute.

The Conciliation Officer or the Board is not empowered to

adjudicate upon the dispute, which is the area of

adjudicatory authorities. When a complaint is made to

adjudicatory authority viz. Arbitrator, Labour Court,

Tribunal or National Tribunal, it will adjudicate upon the

dispute as if it is a dispute referred to or pending before it.

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4159

9. The application was withdrawn by the Nigam

claiming that there was no dispute for renewal of insurance

scheme with effect from 10-03-2013 with majority union

namely, MTNL Delhi Mazdoor Sangh.

10. What is the effect of non-moving an application

for approval? Such proposition was taken note of by the

Apex Court in Jaipur Zila Sehkari Bhoomi Vikas Bank (AIR

2002 S.C. 643) wherein it was held that it would be clear

case of contravention of the proviso to section 33(2)(b) of

the Act. It would be expedient to reproduce the law laid in

the above precedent, which are extracted thus:

‘‘The proviso to Section 33(2)(b) as can be seen

from its very unambiguous and clear language, is

mandatory. This apart from the object of Section 33

and in the context of the proviso to Section 33(2)(b),

it is obvious that the conditions contained in the

said proviso are to be essentially complied with.

Further any employer who contravenes the

provisions of Section 33 invites a punishment under

S. 31 (1) with imprisonment for a term which may

extend to six months or with fine which may extend

to Rs.1000 or with both. This penal provision is again

a pointer of the mandatory nature of the proviso to

comply with the conditions stated therein. To put it

in other way, the said conditions being mandatory,

are to be satisfied if an order of discharge or dismissal

passed under Section 33(2)(b) is to be operative, if

an employer desires to take benefit of the said

provision for passing an order of discharge or

dismissal of an employee, he has also to take the

burden of discharging the statutory obligation

placed on him in the said proviso. Taking a contrary

view that an order of discharge or dismissal passed

by an employer in contravention of the mandatory

conditions contained in the proviso does not render

such an order inoperative or void, defeats the very

purpose of the proviso and it becomes meaningless.

It is well settled rule of interpretation that no part of

statute shall be construed as unnecessary or

superfluous. The proviso cannot be diluted or

disobeyed by an employer. He cannot disobey the

mandatory provision and then say that the order of

discharge or dismissal made in contravention of

Section 33(2)(b) is not void or in-perative. He cannot

be permitted to take advantage of his own wrong.

The interpretation of statute must be such that it

should advance the legislative intent and serve the

purpose for which it is made rather than to frustrate

it. The proviso to Section 33(2)(b) affords protection

to a workman to safeguard his interest and it is a

shield against victimization and unfair labour

practice by the employer during the pendency of

industrial dispute when the relationship between

them are already strained. An employer cannot be

permitted to use the provision of Section 33(2)(b) to

ease out a workman without complying with the

conditions contained in the said proviso for any

alleged misconduct said to be unconnected with

the already pending industrial dispute. The

protection afforded to a workman under the said

provision cannot be taken away. If it is to be held

that an order of discharge or dismissal passed by

the employer without complying with the

requirements of the said proviso is not void or

inoperative, the employer may with impunity

discharge or dismiss a workman.

11. The Apex Court dealt with the situation of the

withdrawal of such approval application or not making an

application in the following manner:

‘‘The view that when no application is made or the

one made is withdrawn, there is no order of refusal

of such application on merit and as such the order

of dismissal or discharge does not become void or

inoperative unless such an order is set aside under

Section 33A, cannot be accepted. In our view, not

making an application under Section 33(2) (b)

seeking approval or withdrawing an application

once made before any order is made thereon, is a

clear case of contravention of the proviso to Section

33(2)(b). An employer who does not make an

application under Section 33(2)(b) or withdraws that

one made, cannot be rewarded by relieving him of

the statutory obligation created on him to make such

an application. If it is so done, he will be happier or

more comfortable than an employer who obeys the

command of law and makes an application inviting

scrutiny of the authority in the matter of granting

approval of the action taken by him. Adherence to

and obedience of law should be obvious and

necessary in a system governed by rule of law. An

employer by design can avoid to make an application

after dismissing or discharging an employee or file it

and withdraw before any order is passed on it, on its

merits, to take a position that such order is not

inoperative or till it is set aside under Section 33A

notwithstanding the contravention of Section

33(2)(b) proviso, driving the employee to have

recourse to one or more proceeding by making a

complaint under Section 33A or to raise another

industrial dispute or to make a complaint under

Section 31(1). Such an approach destroys the

protection specifically and expressly given to an

employee under the said proviso as against possible

victimization, unfair labour practice or harassment

because of pendency of industrial dispute so that

an employee can be saved from hardship of

unemployment.

12. In view of above legal proposition it is announced

that the Nigam would be faced with the consequences of

withdrawal of the application, referred above, in case

provisions of section 33 of the Act is violated by it. An

award is accordingly passed. It be sent to the appropriate

Government for publication.

Dated : 21-3-2013

Dr. R. K. YADAV, Presiding Officer

4160

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ubZ fnYyh] 5 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1579-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj nf{k.k iwoZ jsyos

ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 54@98)

dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 27&06&2013 dks

izkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹iQk- la- ,y&41012@148@97&vkbZ vkj (ch&I)º

lqefr ldykuh] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 5th July, 2013

S. O. 1579.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 54/98)

of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial

Dispute between the management of S. E. Railway and

their workmen, received by the Central Government on

27-06-2013.

[ F. No. L-41012/148/97-IR (B-I)]

SUMATI SAKLANI, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT,

JABALPUR

No. CGIT/LC/R/54/98

Presiding Officer : SHRI R. B. PATLE

Shri N.Vasu,

Wagon Repairing Shop,

S.E. Rly., W.R.S. Colony,

Raipur

... Workman

Versus

Sr. Divisional Personnel Officer (Admn.),

S.E. Rly., Bilaspur ... Management

AWARD

Passed on this 14th day of May, 2013

1. As per letter dated 9-3-98 by the Government of

India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is

received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under

section 10 of I.D. Act, 1947 as per Notification No. L-41012/

148/97-IR (B-I). The dispute under reference relates to :

‘‘Whether the action of the management of Senior

Divisional Personnel Officer (Admn.) Bilaspur, South

Eastern Railway, in relation to their Wagon Repairing

Workshop in terminating the services of Shri N.Vasu,

Ex-Peon with effect from 10-11-95 is legal and

justified? If not, to what relief the workman is

entitled?’’

2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to

the parties. 1st party workman submitted his statement of

claim. The case of 1st party workman is that he was

appointed as Bunglow Peon w.e.f. 27-4-95. His services

were terminated from10-11-95. His work was satisfactory.

There was no complaint about him. His services were

terminated without notice. He had continuously worked

for more than 240 days without any break. Termination of

his service is in violation of Section 25-F, G, H & N of I.D.

Act. The termination of service is illegal. On such

contention workman prays for his reinstatement with

consequential benefits.

3. IInd party management filed Written Statement

opposing claim of workman. It is not disputed that

applicant workman was appointed from 28-4-95 as Bunglow

Peon. After retirement of Shri S.V.L.N.Chari i.e. after 6

months, 12 days of service, his services were terminated

from 10-11-95 as officer to whom he was attached has

retired on 31-10-95. That as per policy letter dated 31-5-95,

the substitute/casual Bunglow peon not completed one

year service. His services are required to be terminated. In

pursuance of said policy decision, the services of 1st party

workman were terminated. All other allegation of workman

are denied. It is denied that workman has completed 240

days continuous service. It is denied that the termination

of 1st party workman is in violation of Section 25-F, G, H &

N of I.D. Act. He has prayed that relief prayed by workman

be rejected.

4. Considering pleadings on record, the points which

arise for my consideration and determination are as under.

My findings are recorded against each of them for the

reasons as below :—

(i) Whether the termination of

In Affirmative

services of 1st party workman

Shri N. Vasu, Ex-Peon with

effect from 10-11-95 is legal?

(ii) If so, to what relief the Relief prayed by

workman is entitled to?”

workman isrejected.

REASONS

5. Though 1st party workman in his statement of

claim submits that he has completed 240 days continuous

service, he has not adduced any evidence.

6. Management's witness filed affidavit of evidence

covering all the points in Written Statement filed by the

IInd party/management. The witness of the management

is not cross-examined as the workman remained absent.

The evidence of management's witness remained

unchallenged. The witness of the management has stated

that 1st party workman was working only for 6 months 12

days. He was not working continuously for 240 days. In

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4161

view of unchallenged evidence of management's witness,

the workman is not covered under Section 25(b) of I.D.Act.

The provisions. The workman is not entitled to protection

of Section 25-F, G, H & N of I.D.Act. Therefore action of

management in terminating the services cannot be said.

illegal. For above reasons, I record my finding in Point

No.1 in Affirmative.

7. In the result, award is passed as under :—

(1) Action of the IInd party management in

terminating the services of Shri N. Vasu, Ex.-Peon

with effect from 10-11-95 is legal.

(2) Relief prayed by workman is rejected.

R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 5 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1580-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ ,l lh

lh ,y ds çca/ra=k ds laca¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds

chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 46@2013)

dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 5&7&2013 dks çkIr

gqvk Fkk A

¹iQk- la- ,y&22012@10@2013&vkbZ vkj (lh,e&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 5th July, 2013

S.O. 1580.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 46/2013)

of the Central Government Indus. Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure in the

Industrial Dispute between the management of M/s.

Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd. and their workmen, which was

received by the Central Government on 5-7-2013.

[ F. No. L- 22012/10/2013-IR (CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT

AT HYDERABAD

Present : Smt. M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer

Dated the 28th day of May, 2013

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 46/2013

Between:

The President,

(Sri R. Kashiramulu),

Telengana Trade Union Council,

H.No.3-5-247/3, Azmathpura,

Karimnagar Dist.,

Karimnagar.

. . . .Petitioner

AND

The General Manager,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

Bhupalapally Area, Bhupalapally,

Warangal Dist.-506169. . . . .Respondent

Appearances:

For the Petitioner : M/s. A. Sarojana & K. Vasudeva Reddy,

Advocates

For the Respondent : None

AWARD

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its order

No. L-220l2/l0/2013-IR(CM-II) dated 3-4-2013 referred the

following dispute under Section l0(l)(d) of the I,D. Act,

1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal between the

management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

and their workman. The reference is,

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the Chief General Manager,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Bhupalapalli

Area, Warangal Dist., in terminating the services of

Sri APCH Venkateshwar Rao, Ex-Coal Filler, KTK-1

incline, SCCo. Ltd., Bhupalpalli Area, Warangal

Distt., with effect from 26-8-2009 is justified or not?

To what relief the applicant is entitled for?"

The reference is numbered in this Tribunal as I.D.

No. 46/2013 and notices are yet to be issued to the parties

concerned.

2. The case is posted for appearance of parties to

13-6-2013. While things stood so, Sri K. Vasudeva Reddy,

Advocate filed Vakalat for the Petitioner together with

a petition i.e., I.A No.76/2013 invoking Sec. 36(4) of

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 seeking for permission to

appear for the Petitioner. Further he filed I. A. No. 78/2013

seeking for advancement of the case to 28-5-2013 and filed

a memo seeking for permission to withdraw the case. In the

given circumstances, IA No.76/2013 and IA No.78/2013 are

allowed. Sri K. Vasudeva Reddy, Advocate is permitted to

represent the Petitioner.

3. In pursuance of the order in IA No.78/2013 dated

28-5-2013, this case is advanced to 28-5-2013. In the memo

filed by the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner, seeking for

permission to withdraw the petition, Petitioner pleaded that

the management was kind enough to offer employment to

him subject to withdrawal of the present dispute and that

he is to be permitted to withdraw the petition. Notice given

to other side. Heard both parties. Petitioner is permitted to

withdraw his case. In the result, the case is dismissed as

withdrawn.

4162

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Award passed accordingly. Transmit.

Dictated to Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant

transcribed by her and corrected by me on this the 28th

day of May, 2013.

M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner NIL

Witnesses examined for the Respondent NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

ubZ fnYyh] 5 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1581-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ ,l lh

lh ,y ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds

chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 45@2013)

dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 2&7&2013 dks çkIr

gqvk Fkk A

¹iQk- la- ,y&22012@5@2013&vkbZ vkj (lh,e&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 5th July, 2013

S.O. 1581.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 45/2013)

of the Central Govt. Indus. Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,

Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial

Dispute between the management of M/s.Singareni

Collieries Co. Ltd. and their workmen, which was received

by the Central Government on 5-7-2013.

[ F. No. L- 22012/5/2013-IR (CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT

AT HYDERABAD

Present : Smt. M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer

Dated the 28th day of May, 2013

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 45/2013

Between:

The President,

(Sri R. Kashiramulu),

Telengana Trade Union Council,

H.No.3-5-247/3, Azmathpura,

Karimnagar Dist.,

Karimnagar. .. ..Petitioner

AND

The General Manager,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

Bhupalapally Area, Bhupalapally,

Warangal Dist.-506169.

. ...Respondent

Appearances :

For the Petitioner : M/s. A. Sarojana & K. Vasudeva Reddy,

Advocates

For the Respondent : None

AWARD

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its

order No. L-22012/5/2013- IR(CM-II) dated 3-4-2013 referred

the following dispute under Section l0(1)(d) of the

I.D. Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal between the

management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

and their workman. The reference is,

SCHEDULE

‘‘Whether the action of the Chief General Manager,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Bhupalapalli

Area, Warangal Dist., in terminating the services of

Sri Chenigarapu Venu @Shenigarapu Venu, Ex-Badli

Filler, KTK-6 incline, Bhupalpalli Area, Warangal

Distt., with effect from 13-10-2008 is justified or not?

If not, to what relief the applicant is entitled for?’’

The reference is numbered in this Tribunal as I.D.

No.45/2013 and notices are yet to be issued to the parties

concerned.

2. The case is posted for appearance of parties to

13-6-2013. While things stood so, Sri K. Vasudeva Reddy,

Advocate filed Vakalat for the Petitioner together with a

petition i.e., IA No.77/2013 invoking Sec.36(4) of Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 seeking for permission to appear for

the Petitioner. Further he filed I.A.No.75/2013, seeking for

advancement of the case to 28-5-2013 and filed a memo

seeking for permission to withdraw the case. In the given

circumstances, IA No.77/2013 and IA No.75/2013 are

allowed. Sri K. Vasudeva Reddy, Advocate is pennitted to

represent the Petitioner.

3. In pursuance of the order in IA No. 75/2013 dated

28-5-2013, this case is advanced to 28-5-2013. In the memo

filed by the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner, seeking for

permission to withdraw the petition, Petitioner pleaded that

the management was kind enough to offer employment to

him subject to withdrawal of the present dispute and that

he is to be permitted to withdraw the petition. Notice given

to other side. Heard both parties. Petitioner is permitted to

withdraw his case. In the result, the case is dismissed as

withdrawn.

Award passed accordingly. Transmit.

Dictated to Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant

transcribed by her and corrected by me on this the 28th

day of May, 2013.

M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4163

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner NIL

Witnesses examined for the Respondent NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

ubZ fnYyh] 5 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1582-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ ,l lh

lh ,y ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds

chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky; gSnjkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 12@2012)

dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 5&7&2013 dks çkIr

gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y&22012@8@2012&vkbZ vkj (lh,e&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 5th July, 2013

S.O. 1582.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 12/2012)

of the Cent. Govt. Indus. Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,

Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial

Dispute between the management of M/s. Singareni

Collieries Co. Ltd. and their workmen, received by the

Central Government on 5-7-2013.

[ No. L- 22012/8/2012-IR (CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT

AT HYDERABAD

Present : Smt. M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer

Dated the 26th April, 2013

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 12/2012

Between:

The General Secretary (Riaz Ahmed),

Singareni Miners & Engg. Workers Union (HMS)

Qtr. No.C-34, Sector-I, Godavarikhani,

Karimnagar(AP) - 505209. ...Petitioner/Union

AND

The Chief General Manager,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

Bhupalapally Area, Bhupalapally,

Adilabad Dist.-504303. . . . .Respondent

Appearances :

For the Petitioner : M/s. A. Sarojana & K. Vasudeva Reddy,

Advocates

For the Respondent : None

AWARD

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its

Order No. L-22012/8/2012-IR(CM-II) dated 28-3-2012

referred the following dispute under Section 10(l)(d) of the

I.D. Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal between the

management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

and their workman represented by the General Secretary,

Singareni Miners & Engg. Workers Union (HMS). The

reference is,

SCHEDULE

‘‘Whether the action of the General Manager,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Bhupalapalli

Area, in terminating the services of Sri Bejjanki

Mahender, Ex-Coal Filler, KTK-2 Incline, Bhupalapalli

Area with effect from 5-9-2007 is fair and justified?

To what relief the concerned workman is entitled?"

The reference is numbered in this Tribunal as I.D.

No. 12/2012 and notices were issued to the parties

concerned.

2. The case stands for filing of claim statement and

documents by the Petitioner to 15-5-2013. Petitioner filed

IA No. 38/2013 on 15-4-2013 seeking for advancement of

the case to 15.4.2013 and filed a memo seeking for

permission to withdraw the case.

3. In pursuance of the order in IA No.38/2013 dated

26-4-2013, this case is advanced to 26-4-2013. In the memo

filed by the Petitioner seeking for permission to withdraw

the case, Petitioner pleaded that the management was kind

enough to offer employment to him subject to withdrawal

of the present dispute and that he be permitted to withdraw

the petition.

4. Notice given to Respondent. Heard both parties.

Petitioner is permitted to withdraw his case.

5. In the result, the case is dismissed as withdrawn.

Award is passed accordingly.

Transmit.

Dictated to Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant

transcribed by her and corrected by me on this the 26th

day of April, 2013.

M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, Presiding Officer

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner NIL

Witnesses examined for the Respondent NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

4164

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ubZ fnYyh] 8 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1583-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ LesYVj

IykUV ukydks vuqxqy mMhlk ds çca/ra=k ds laca¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj

muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky; Hkqous'oj ds

iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 2@2013) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh;

ljdkj dks 3&7&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹iQk- la- ,y&43012@2@2012&vkbZ vkj (,e)º

tksgu rksiuks] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 8th July, 2013

S.O. 1583.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the common Award (Ref.

No. 2/2013) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/

Labour Court, Bhubaneswar now as shown in the

Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers

in relation to the management of Smelter Plant, NALCO,

Angul, Odisha and their workman, which was received by

the Central Government on 3-7-2013.

[F. No. L- 43012/2/2012-IR (M)]

JOHAN TOPNO, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL

TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT

BHUBANESWAR

Present :

Shri J. Srivastava,

Presiding Officer,

C.G..I.T.-Cum-Labour Court, Bhubaneswar.

Industrial Dispute Case No. 2/2013

Date of Passing order 28th May, 2013

Between :

The General Manager,

Smelter Plant, NALCO,

P.O. & Dist. Angul, (Odisha)

.....1st Party Management

(And)

Shri Mohan Behera,

Qr. No. A/229, NALCO Nagar,

PO. Nalco Nagar, Dist. Angul-759145

.....2nd Party-Workman

Appearances :

None

For the 1st Party-Managements.

None

For the 2nd Party Workman.

ORDER

Case taken up. None is present for the 1st Party-

Management. The 2nd Party-workman is present is person

and moves a petition for withdrawal of the case. The 1st

Party-Management has not put in appearance as yet.

2. It has been stated in the withdrawal application

that the matter of reinstatement in service has almost been

settled by the National Commissioner of Scheduled Caste,

but the Management has imposed a condition that first the

workman should withdraw the case pending in the CGIT,

Bhubaneswar. Accordingly this withdrawal petition has

been moved.

3. Since the 2nd party-workman is voluntarily

withdrawing his case before this Tribunal there is no

impediment in allowing his petition. He is accordingly

permitted to withdraw the case and a no dispute award is

passed in the case.

Dictated & Corrected by me.

J. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 8 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1584-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ ,p Mh

,iQ lh LVsUMj ykbiQ bUL;ksjsa'k d- fyfeVsM jk;iqj ds çca/ra=k ds

laca¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/ esa fu£n"V

vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;

tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 28@2007) çdkf'kr djrh gS tks

dsUæh; ljdkj dks 2&7&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹iQk- la- ,y&17012@20@2006&vkbZ vkj (,e)º

tksgu rksiuks] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 8th July, 2013

S.O. 1584.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the common Award (Ref.

No. 28/2007) of the Central Government Industrial

Tribunal/Labour Court, Jabalpur now as shown in the

Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers

in relation to the management of M/s. HDFC Standard Life

Insurance Co. Ltd., Raipur and their workman, which was

received by the Central Government on 2-7-2013.

[F. No. L- 17012/20/2006-IR (M)]

JOHAN TOPNO, Under Secy.

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4165

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR

COURT, JABALPUR

No. CGIT/LC/R/28/07

Presiding Officer : Shri R. B. Patle

Smt. Dolly Ghoshal,

W/o Shri Amit Ghoshal,

B/11, Maruthi Residency,

Amlidhi, Raipur (CG)- 492001 ....Workman

Versus

The Chief Executive Officer,

HDFC Standard Life Insurance Co.Ltd.,

IInd Floor, A Wing, Trade Star Building,

Junction of Kondfivita & MV Road,

Andheri Kurla Road,

East Mumbai

The Resident Manager,

HDFC Standard Insurance Co.Ltd.,

1st Floor, Vanijya Bhawan,

Devendarnagar Road, Sainagar,

Raipur ....Management

AWARD

Passed on this 7th day of June, 2013

1.

As per letter dated 13-2-2007 by the Government of

India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is

received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under

Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.L-17012/

20/2006-IR(M) . The dispute under reference relates to:

“1. Whether Smt. Dolly Ghoshal, Officer Operation,

HDFC Standard Insurance Co.Ltd. is a workman by

the nature of job performed by her and if so,

2. Whether the action of the management of HDFC

Standard insurance Co. Ltd in dismissing Smt. Dolly

Ghoshal, Officer Operation from her services without

following the principles of natural justice and not

conducting a domestic enquiry into the allegations

is justified? If not, to what relief she is entitled?”

2.

After receiving, reference, notices were issued to

the parties. 1st party workman despite of notice, failed to

submit Statement of Claim. Exparte order is passed against

workman on 17-3-2011.

3.

The IInd party management submitted Written

Statement on 8-7-2010. It is submitted by management that

it is engaged in Insurance Business. 1st party Dolly

Ghoshal was employed as Officer (Operations) and the

reference is not tenable as Smt. Dolly Ghoshal was

appointed in Company as Officer Operation. The job profile

of the officer operation are shown in the Written Statement

filed by the management. She was appointed on salary of

Rs. 9025 Therefore she is not workman under Section 2(S)

of I.D.Act. It is further submitted that workman was working

with the management of Ilnd party and it was found that

she was indulged in misappropriation of money. Her

explanation was called on 4-1-06. The reply was received

on 9-1-06. The management had investigated the

allegations and found Miss Dolly Ghoshal has indulged in

acts of dishonesty and gross violation in connection with

employer’s business and therefore she was dismissed from

services of the company. However 1st party Dolly had

requested for relieving letter by company. Her request was

accepted and she was given a relieving letter inspite of

being dismissed on humanitarian ground. That Miss Dolly

Ghoshal tried to create undue pressure on the management

making false allegations. IInd party management prays for

rejection of the demands under reference.

4.

Considering pleadings on record, the points which

arise for my consideration and determination are as under.

My findings are recorded against each of them for the

reasons as below :—

(i) Whether Smt. Dolly Ghoshal,

In Affirmative

Officer Operation, HDFC Standard

Insurance Co.Ltd. is a workman

under Section 2(S) of I.D. Act and

reference is tenable.

(ii) Whether the action of the

In Affirmative

management of HDFC Standard

insurance Co. Ltd in dismissing

Smt. Dolly Ghoshal, Officer

Operation from her services is legal?

(iii) If not, what relief the workman

Relief prayed

is entitled to?”

by workman

is rejected.

REASONS

5.

Though dismissal from service is challenged by

1st party, she has failed to submit statement of claim or

adduced evidence. 1st party is proceeded exparte. IInd

party in its Written Statement has contended that Dolly

Ghoshal is not covered as workman under Section 2( s) of

I.D.Act. The job profile of Dolly Ghoshal are given in

para-3 of the Written Statement. The duties includes

Scrutiny of Life Insurance Proposal form, processing the

proposal form if deemed fit, accept cash DD and cheque

from customers against proposal form, Maintaining the

DSR and Score Card, agency related work, Petty Cash

related work etc. The job profile of Miss Dolly Ghoshal

would not be taken out as workman defined under

Section 2(s) of I.D.Act. For above reasons, I hold that

Miss Dolly Ghoshal is covered as workman and reference

is tenable. Accordingly I record my finding in Point No.1 in

Affirmative.

6.

Point No.2—1st party workman is challenging

dismissal from service. However she has not filed statement

of claim, she has not adduced any evidence, evidence

adduced by management’s witness Neeraj pandey show

that Miss Dolly Ghoshal was involved in act of

misappropriation of some amount, notice was given to her,

4166

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

reply was received and the allegation were inquired into.

The evidence of the management’s witness remained

unchallenged as 1st party did not cross-examined said

witness. Thus there is absolutely no pleadings or evidence

on behalf of 1st party to establish that dismissal of

Miss Dolly Ghoshal is illegal. Therefore the action of the

management of Ilnd party management cannot be said illegal.

For above reasons, I record my answer in Affirmative.

7.

In the result, award is passed as under :—

(1) 1st party Miss Dolly Ghoshal is a workman. Action of

the dismissal of Miss Dolly Ghoshal by management

of IInd party is legal.

(2) Reliefs prayed by 1st party Miss Dolly Ghoshal are

rejected.

R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 8 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1585-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bLVuZ

feujYl Vsª¯Mx ,tsUlh] tcyiqj ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa

vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds

iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 93@2007) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh;

ljdkj dks 2&7&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y&29011@12@1997&vkbZ vkj (,e)º

tksgu rksiuks] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 8th July, 2013

S.O. 1585.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the common award (Ref.

No. 93/2007) of the Central Government Industrial

Tribunal/Labour Court, Jabalpur now as shown in the

Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers

in relation to the management of M/s. Eastern Minerals

Trading Agency, Jabalpur and their workman, which was

received by the Central Government on 2-7-2013.

[No. L- 29011/12/1997-IR (M)]

JOHAN TOPNO, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

JABALPUR

No. CGIT/LC/R/93/07

Presiding Officer : Shri R. B. Patle

The President,

Ispat Khadan Janta Mazdoor Union,

20, Savarkar Ward, New Basti,

Distt. Jabalpur

....Workman

Versus

M/s Eastern Minerals Trading Agency,

Kuteshwar Stone Mines, Gortalai (Barhi),

Katni, Distt. Jabalpur ....Management

AWARD

Passed on this 6th day of June, 2013

1.

As per letter dated 14-9-07 by the Government of

India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is

received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under

Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.L-29011/

12/1997-IR(M). The dispute under reference relates to:

“ Whether the issues raised by Ispapt Khadan Janata

Mazdoor Union in their charger of demands on following

items viz:-

(i) Non-maintenance of record of 60 employees.

(ii) Dust Allowance of Rs.15 per month,

(iii) Maintenance of overtime records by the

management,

(iv) Grant of Medical Facilities to the employees and

(v) Cancellation of transfer of the 24 workman to Asansol

headquarters are just and legal?

If so, to what relief the workmen are entitled to?”

2.

1st party Union is challenging 5 demands in the

dispute under reference. Even after issuing notices, the

Union has not participated in the proceeding, no statement

of claim is filed. 1st party is proceeded exparte on

11-5-2011.

3.

IInd party management also not filed Written

Statement. From conduct of the 1st party, it is clear that the

parties are not pursuing or participating in the dispute.

4.

In the result, award is passed as under:—

“Reference is disposed off as No Dispute Award.”

R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 8 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1586-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ Mk;e.M

lhesaV~l fojykiqj] tcyiqj ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj

muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds

iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 235@1998) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh;

ljdkj dks 2-7-2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y&29012@99@1998&vkbZ vkj (,e)º

tksgu rksiuks] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 8th July, 2013

S.O. 1586.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the common award (Ref.

No. 235/1998) of the Central Government Industrial

Tribunal/Labour Court, Jabalpur now as shown in the

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4167

Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers

in relation to the management of M/s. Diamond Cement,

Birlapur, Jabalpur, and their workman, which was received

by the Central Government on 2-7-2013.

[No. L- 29012/99/1998-IR (M)]

JOHAN TOPNO, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

JABALPUR

No. CGIT/LC/R/235/98

Presiding Officer : Shri R. B. Patle

The Vice President,

Khadan Mazdoor Union,

Head Office, Shram Sadhna,

West Land, Ordanance Factory,

Katni, Jabalpur

....Workman/Union

Versus

The President,

M/s. Diamond Cement,

Birlapur, PO Narsingarh,

Damoh, Jabalpur

...Management

AWARD

Passed on this 11th day of April, 2013

As per letter dated 28-10-98 by the Government of

India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is

received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under

Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.

L-290 12/99/98-IR(M). The dispute under reference relates

to:

“Whether the action of the management of

M/s. Diamond Cements in transferring Shri G

Paramanandam to the unit at Ammasandra in

Karnataka and subsequent termination of his services

by Ammasandra Unit of Diamond Cements Ltd is

justified? If not, to what relief the workman is

entitled?”

2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to

the parties. 1st party workman did not file his statement of

claim. The reference proceeded exparte against workman

on 16-12-2005.

3. Management filed exparte Written Statement. IInd

party management contented that statement of claim as

per Rule 10(B) of I.D.Act is not filed by 1st party workman.

Exparte order has been passed. The management was

directed to file Written Statement. That 1st party workman

was appointed as worker in 1982. As per clause-6 of

appointment order, services of 1st party workman are

transferable to any establishment of the company anywhere

in India depending upon the exigencies of work. That the

services of workman are covered by standing orders, Rules

and Regulations in force from time to time with regard to

work, attendance, conduct and discipline. That IInd party

runs Cement Factories at different places. One in

Ammasandra, Distt. Tumkur in Karnataka State, another at

Narsingarh, District, Damoh in Madhya Pradesh and the

third at Madora, Jhansi in Uttar Pradesh.

4. That after appointment of 1st party, his performance

was not satisfactory. Letter No. 6497 dated 4-6-84 was

received about his careless performance. Another letter

No. 613 dated 27-8-84 was issued for the act subversive of

discipline. 3rd letter No. 2722 dated 24-4-85 was issued

against refusal to obey the lawful orders of his superiors.

During next 9 years, there was no grievance of his duties

and 1st party workman was transferred for administrative

exigencies as per order dated 30-12-94 to Ammasandra Unit.

He was relieved on 10-1-95. However workman did not join

new place of his posting. The management cannot be called

upon to pay wages by keeping him simple idle. His services

needs to be utilized wherever required and the workman

did not report to the place of his transfer. Chief Personal

Manager vide D.O .Letter No. 20552 dated 21-2-95 are

Sr. Manager IR, whether the transfer order dated 30-12-94

is alive. Reply was received to said letter as per letter dated

1-3-95 that the transfer of Mr. G.Parmanandam was alive.

He was relieved on 10-1-95. Chief Personal Manager has

also written letter on 11-3-95 passing orders that in view of

this voluntarily left and abandoned the company’s service,

his services were terminated from 11-3-95. That the transfer

has not changed his nature of job or service condition, pay

scale, status etc. the workman failed to report to duty to

the place he was transferred.

5. The workman fully aggrieved filed proceeding

before the ALC(C), Jabalpur and reference has been made.

It is submitted that transfer is the administrative prerogative

of the management. Writ Petition No. 3895/95 was filed by

the workman at High Court at Jabalpur. The said petition

was dismissed on 26-2-96 only with the direction to the

management to allow the wards of the workman to retain

the residential quarter till the examinations were over. That

the examination of his children was over by 27-3-96.

However the quarter was not vacated as per directions of

the Hon’ble High Court. The management has no option

but to file a Civil Suit before the Chief Judicial Magistrate

Damoh under Section 630 of the Companies Act for vacation

of the quarters. That in 1999, workman approached the

management for full and final settlement of his

account.Accordingly his PF and pension fund

accumulation were released as per letter No. 2411 dated

21-7-99. That workman is paid Rs.24548 vide cheque No.

731044 dated 8-9-99 towards gratuity. The services of the

1st party workman are terminated as he voluntarily left his

service. On such contentions, IInd party prayed for

rejection of the relief prayed by the workman.

4168

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

6. Considering pleadings on record, the points which

arise for my consideration and determination are as under.

My findings are recorded against each of them for the

reasons as below:—

(i)

Whether the action of the

management of M/s

In Affirmative

Diamond Cements in

transferring Shri G.

Paramanandam to the unit

at Ammasandra in

Kamataka and subsequent

termination of his services by

Ammasandra Unit of Diamond

Cements Ltd is justified?

(ii) If so, to what relief the

Reliefs prayed by

workman is entitled to?”

workman

are

rejected.

REASONS

7. 1st party workman challenged order of his transfer

dated 30-12-94 to Ammasandra Unit in Karnataka and

termination of services dated 11-3-95. 1st party workman

had not submitted his statement of claim. The management

filed Written Statement contending that the services of

workman are transferable to the units anywhere in India as

per clause-6 in the Appointment Order. Copy of the

appointment order is produced on record as Annexure

M-l. That workman did not join to the place of his transfer

despite he was relieved. Consequently his services were

terminated. The evidence of management’s witness

Shri R.S.Shekawat remained unchallenged. The services of

the workman are terminated as voluntarily abandoned his

services. That the 1st party workman had approached to

the Hon’ble High Court and he was paid amount of gratuity

in the year 1999. In view of unchallenged evidence on the

above point, the action of IInd party management cannot

be said illegal. For above reasons, I record my finding in

Point No.1 in Affirmative.

8. In the result, award is passed as under;—

(1)The action of theIInd party management in

transferring the 1st party workman Shri G.

Paramanandam to the unit at Ammasandra in

Karnataka and subsequent termination of his

services by Ammasandra Unit of Diamond Cements

Ltd. is legal.

(2) Relief prayed by workman are rejected.

R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 10 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1587-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bf.M;u

C;wjks vkWiQ ekbUl ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds

deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh;

ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] t;iqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ

la[;k 84@2005) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks

10&7&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y&42012@190@2004&vkbZ vkj (lh,e&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 10th July, 2013

S.O. 1587.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 84/2005) of

the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Jaipur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial

dispute between the management of Indian Bureau of

Mines, and their workmen, received by the Central

Government

on

10-7-2013.

[No. L- 42012/190/2004-IR (CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

vuqcU/

dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;]

t;iqj

lh-th-vkbZ-Vh-izdj.k la- 84@2005

Jh ,u-ds- iqjksfgr] ihBklhu vf/dkjh

jsiQjsUl ua- ,y&42012@190@2004&IR(CM-II) fnukad 2&8&2005

Sh. Durgalal S/o Sukhalal,

Back Side of R.C. Church, Opp. Dev Narain Mandir,

Flat No. 106, Parvatpura,

Ajmer (Rajasthan)

V/s.

The Controller of Mines,

Indian Bureau of Mines,

B-9, Tie. B.M. Colony, Balupura Road, Adarsh Nagar,

Ajmer (Rajasthan)

izkFkhZ dh rjiQ ls

% Jh vkj-lh-tSu

vizkFkhZ dh rjiQ ls % Jh dq.kky jkor

% iapkV %

fnukad 8&3&2013

1- dsUæh; ljdkj ds }kjk fuEu fookn vkS|ksfxd fookn

vf/fu;e] 1947 dh /kjk 10 dh mi&/kjk ds [k.M (?k) ds

izko/kuksa ds vUrxZr mDr vkns'k fnukad 2&8&2005 ds }kjk

U;k;fu.kZ;u gsrq izsf"kr fd;k x;k Fkk %

^^D;k [kku fu;a=kd] Hkkjrh; [kku C;wjks ch&9] VkbZ-ch-,e-

dkWyksuh] ckywiqj jksM] vknZ'k uxj] vtesj ds }kjk vius deZdkj

Jh nqxkZyky iq=k Jh [kq'kkyky dks fnukad 22&12&97 ls lsok ls

c[kkZLr djuk mfpr ,oa oS/ gS\ ;fn ugha rks deZdkj vius

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4169

fu;kstd ls fdl jkgr dks ikus dk vf/dkjh gS \**

2- LVsVeSUV vkWiQ Dyse esa izkFkhZ ds vfHkopu gS fd o"kZ

1990&91 esa 6 ekg rd nSfud osru Hkksxh vdq'ky deZpkjh ds

:i esa vizkFkhZ mÙkjkapy dk;kZy;] vtesj] esa pkSdhnkj ds in ij

inLFkkfir ,oa lsokjr jgk gSA blds vfrfjDr o"kZ 1996 ls 98 esa

v;Ld izlk/u iz;ksx'kkyk] vtesj esa Hk.Mkj 'kk[kk esa pkSdhnkj

ds in ij dk;Zjr jgk gSA izkFkhZ us o"kZ 1990&99 dh vof/ esa ,d

o"kZ esa 240 fnu ls vf/d fnu dk;Z fd;k gS] ysfdu vizkFkhZ }kjk

vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e dh /kjk 25 F ds vkns'kkRed izko/kuksa

dh ikyuk fd, fcuk mls lsok ls gVk fn;k x;kA izkFkhZ ds ;g Hkh

vfHkopu gS fd mls lsok ls gVk, tkus ds ckn fnukad 20&12&2000

dks og ^^iQhYM vnZyh** ds in ds fy, lk{kkRdkj ds fy,

mifLFkr gqvk] ysfdu mls volj u nsdj vizkFkhZ foHkkx ds nwljs

O;fDr dks lsok esa j[k fy;kA bl izdkj vizkFkhZ us vkS|ksfxd fookn

vf/fu;e dh /kjk 25 H dk Hkh mYya?ku fd;k gSA izkFkhZ us fnukad

12-12-97 dks mls lsok ls c[kkZLr fd, tkus ds vkns'k dks voS/

?kksf"kr dj lsok esa iqu% cgky djus rFkk mDr fnol ls cdk;k

osru e; vU; ykHk fnyokus gsrq izkFkZuk dh gSA

3- vizkFkhZ ds tokc esa izkDdFku gS fd izkFkhZ us dHkh Hkh

pkSdhnkj ds in ij dk;Z ugha fd;k] blfy, mls lsok ls gVkus dk

loky gh ugha mBrkA vizkFkhZ us bu rF;ksa dks Hkh badkj fd;k gS fd

izkFkhZ us vizkFkhZ ds ;gk 240 fnu ls vf/d dk;Z fd;k gS rFkk

vizkFkhZ ds ;gka fu;ksftr deZpkjh jgk gSA vizkFkhZ ds ;g Hkh

izkDdFku gS fd /kjk 25(F) ,oa (H) dk dksbZ mYya?ku ugha gqvk gS]

blfy, LVsVeSaV vkWiQ Dyse fujLr fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA

4- izkFkhZ us vius i{k dFku ds leFkZu esa Lo;a dk 'kiFk&i=k

izLrqr fd;k gS rFkk vU; lk{khx.k Jh ,l-ih- dqdjsrh ,oa

Jh nsokuUn oekZ ds 'kiFk&i=k izLrqr fd;s gSA izkFkhZ dh lk{; ds

[k.Mu esa vizkFkhZ us Jh dsnkj flag ;kno ofj"B lgk;d] [kku

fu;a=kd dk 'kiFk&i=k izLrqr fd;k x;k gS rFkk izkFkhZ ds dk;Z

fnolksa lanHkZ esa] dk;Z fnolksa dk fooj.k] eLVj jksy ,oa LohÑrh

vkns'k o fcy okmpj dh iQksVks&izfr;ka izLrqr dh xbZ gSA

5- fnukad 20&12&2005 dks fuEu fopkj.kh; fcUnqvksa dh

lajpuk dh xbZA

I. Whether the disputant has worked as chowkidar

in between the period from 1990 to 1999 as shown at para

3 of the claim statement and had completed 240 days of

work in calendar year prior to his temination, whose service

was terminated in contravention of Section 25-F of the

Act?

II. Whether after the temination of workman’s service

the fresh appointments were made in violation of Section

25-H of the Act?

III. Relief, if any

fcUnq la- 1

6- vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e 1947 dh /kjk 25F ds

izkoèkkuksa ds vuqlkj tc fdlh m|ksx esa fu;ksftr fdlh Jfed dh]

tks fu;kstd ds v/hu de ls de ,d o"kZ ds fy, fujUrj lsok esa

jg pqdk gS] NaVuh rc gh dh tk ldrh gS tc mi[k.M (d) ds

vUrxZr fyf[kr lwpuk ns nh xbZ gks ;k lwpuk ds cnys esa lwpuk dh

dkykof/ ds fy, etnwjh ns nh xbZ gks rFkk mi[k.M ([k) esa crk,

vuqlkj izfrdj ns fn;k x;k gks A

7- vf/fu;e dh /kjk 25 (B) esa fujUrj lsok dks ifjHkkf"kr

fd;k x;k gSA ftlds mi[k.M 1 ds vuqlkj Jfed ,d o"kZ dh

dkykof/ esa vfofPNUu lsok esa jgs gksa ;k mi[k.M (2) ds vuqlkj

;fn mlus ml rkjh[k ls] ftldh izfr funsZ'k ls x.kuk dh tkuh gS]

iwoZ ds ckjg dSys.Mj ekl dh dkykof/ ds nkSjku de ls de 240

fnu okLro esa dke fd;k gksA

8- vf/fu;e dh /kjk 25 F ds izko/kuksa dks vkdf"kZr djus

ds fy, ;g fl¼ djus dk izkjafHkd Hkkj izkFkhZ ij Fkk fd mls fnukad

22&12&97 dks lsok ls c[kkZLr fd;k x;k rFkk og o"kZ 1990 ls 99

dh vof/ esa ,d o"kZ dh dkyof/ esa vfofPNUu lsok esa jgk gS ;k

mlus lsok ls c[kkZLr dh frfFk ls iwoZorhZ 12 ekg dh vof/ esa 240

fnu dk;Z fd;k gSA

9- izkFkhZ ds vfHkopuksa ,oa lk{; esa izLrqr 'kiFk&i=k ds

vuqlkj mlus o"kZ 1990 ls o"kZ 1999 dh vof/ esa ,d o"kZ 240

fnu ls vf/d dk;Z fd;k rFkk mlds fuEu dk;Z fnol Fks%&

o"kZ

ekg

dk;Z fnol

1990&91

fofo/ ekg

6 ekg

1996

vDrwcj

15 fnu

uoEcj

29 fnu

fnlEcj

26 fnu

1997

tuojh

26 fnu

iQjojh

25 fnu

ekpZ

25 fnu

vizSy

27 fnu

ebZ

15 fnu

twu

16 fnu

tqykbZ

24 fnu

vxLr

21 fnu

flrEcj

24 fnu

vDrwcj

29 fnu

uoEcj

19 fnu

fnlEcj

22 fnu

10- izkFkhZ }kjk o"kZ 1990 ls 1999 dh dkykof/ esa tks dk;Z

fnol crk;s x;s gSA mlds vuqlkj o"kZ 1990&91 esa 6 ekg gh dk;Z

fd;k rFkk o"kZ 1992 ls 1995 esa mlds dksbZ dk;Zjr fnol ugha gSa A

o"kZ 1996 esa fliQZ vDrwcj ls fnlEcj dh vof/ esa dqy 70 fnu

dk;Z djuk crk;k gS rFkk o"kZ 1997 esa dqy 273 dk;Z fnol n'kkZ;s

gSaA izkFkhZ }kjk crk;s x;s mDr dk;Z fnolksa ls gh ;g Li"V gS fd

4170

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

LohÑr :i ls og /kjk 25 (B) (1) ds izko/kuksa ds vuqlkj fdlh

Hkh o"kZ vfofPNUu lsok esa ugha jgkA

11- vr% fopkj.kh; iz'u ;g jg tkrk gS fd D;k izkFkhZ

vf/fu;e dh /kjk 25 (B) (2) ds izko/kuksa ds vUrxZr ,d o"kZ

^fujUrj lsok* esa jgk gSA blds fy, izkFkhZ dks lsok ls gVkus dh frfFk

rFkk mDr frfFk ds iwoZorhZ 12 ekg dh vof/ esa izkFkhZ ds dk;Z&fnol

izklafxd gSA

12- izkFkhZ ds dFkkuqlkj mls fnukad 22&12&97 dks lsok ls

gVk;k x;k Fkk rFkk o"kZ 1997 esa mlus dqy 273 fnol dk;Z fd;k gS

tcfd vizkFkhZ lk{kh dk dFku gS fd izkFkhZ us dHkh&Hkh yxkrkj 240

fnu dk;Z ugha fd;kA mldk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd vizkFkhZ ds vtesj

esa rhu dk;kZy; fLFkr gSa muds fjdkMZ ds vuqlkj gS o"kZ 1990 ls

1999 ds eè; nks vyx&vyx Jfedksa us dk;Z fd;k gS ftuds uke

Jh nqxkZyky iq=k Jh lq[kkyky ,oa Jh nqxkZyky iq=k Jh lq[kkjke gS

ftuds dk;Z fnol Øe'k% layXu ifjf'k"V I ,oa ifjf'k"V II esa

n'kkZ;s x;s gSa A vizkFkhZ lk{kh dk dFku gS fd ifjf'k"V I esa crk;s

vuqlkj mlds o"kZ 1997 esa 192 dk;Z fnol gh FksA izfrijh{kk esa

mlus uoEcj esa eLVj&jksy ds vuqlkj 24 fnu dk;Z fnol vkSj

crk;s gSa] mUgsa tksM+us ij o"kZ 1997 esa izkFkhZ ds 216 dk;Z fnol gks

tkrs gSaA

13- fo}ku izfrfuf/ izkFkhZ dk rdZ gS fd dqN nLrkostkr esa

izkFkhZ ds firk dk uke vizkFkhZ us izkFkhZ dks feyus okys ykHkksa ls

oafpr djus ds mís'; ls Jh lq[kyky dh txg Jh lq[kjke vafdr

dj fn;k gSA ifjf'k"V II esa Jh nqxkZyky iq=k Jh lq[kkjke ds tks

dk;Z fnol crk;s gSa og Hkh izkFkhZ ds gh dk;Z fnol gSaA mudk ;g Hkh

rdZ gS vizkFkhZ ds }kjk ftu okmpjl ds vk/kj ij dk;Z fnol

n'kkZ;s x;s gSa] muesa Jh nqxkZyky iq=k Jh lq[kkyky o Jh nqxkZyky

iq=k Jh lq[kkjke ds gLrk{kjksa esa lekurk gS tks n'kkZrh gS fd tks

dk;Z&fnol ifjf'k"V 2 esa crk;s gSa og Hkh izkFkhZ ds gh gSA bl izdkj

ifjf'k"V I ,oa ifjf'k"V II esa o"kZ 1997 ds dqy dk;Z fnolksa ls Li"V

gS fd izkFkhZ us o"kZ 1997 esa 240 fnu ls vf/d fnu dk;Z fd;k gS

blfy;s izkFkhZ dks /kjk 25 (F) ds vkKkid izko/kuksa dh ikyuk

fd;s fcuk gVkus dk ÑR; voS/ o vuqfpr gSA

14- mDr rdksZa ds fojks/ esa fo}ku izfrfuf/ vizkFkhZ dk rdZ

gS fd fjdkMZ ds vuqlkj Jh nqxkZyky iq=k Jh lq[kkyky ,oa Jh

nqxkZyky iq=k Jh lq[kkyky nks vyx&2 Jfedx.k Fks rFkk eLVj&jksy

o Hkqxrku okmPkj ds vuqlkj ifjf'k"V 1 esa crk;s dk;Z fnol ij

gh izkFkhZ us dk;Z fd;k Fkk A izkFkhZ us o"kZ 1997 esa dqy 192 fnu gh

dk;Z fd;k gS A vr% ;g ekuk Hkh tkos fd fnukad 22&12&97 dks

lsok ls i`Fkd fd;k x;k Fkk rks mlls iwoZorhZ 12 ekg esa 140 fnu

dk;Z fnol ugha gksrs A izkFkhZ us mDr vof/ esa 140 fnu dk;Z ds

lEcU/ esa dksbZ izys[kh; lk{; izLrqr ugha dh gS rFkk bl rF; dks

izfrijh{kk esa Lohdkj Hkh fd;k gS fd vizkFkhZ ds ;gka dk;Z djus

ckcr dksbZ lcwr is'k ugha fd;k gS A vr% /kjk 25(F) ds izko/ku

izkFkhZ ds ekeys esa ykxw ugha gksrs A

15- eSusa mDr rdks± ij euu fd;k rFkk mudks n`f"Vxr

gq, izklafxd nLrkostkr dk voyksdu fd;k A

16- izkFkhZ ds dFkukuqlkj o"kZ 1997 esa 273 fnu dk;Z fd;k

gS A izfrijh{kk esa dgk gS fnukad 1&11&1996 ls fnukad 22&12&97

rd dk;Z fd;k Fkk A izkFkhZ ds lk{khx.k Jh ,l-ih-dqdjsth ,oa Jh

nsokuUn oekZ us o"kZ 1990 rd izkFkhZ dk vizkFkhZ ds ;gka dk;Zjr

gksuk rks dgk gS ysfdu fdl ekg esa fdrus fnu dk;Z fd;k ;g

ugha crk;k gS A izkFkhZ us viuh izfrijh{kk esa ekuk gS fd mlus

vizkFkhZ ds ;gka dke djus dk lcwr is'k ugha fd;k gS A

17- ;|fi vizkFkhZ ds tokc esa izkDdFku gS fd izkFkhZ ds

dHkh dke ugha fd;k ysfdu vizkFkhZ lk{kh Jh dsnkj ¯lg ;kno

us vius dFku esa ;g ekuk gS fd izkFkhZ dks vLFkkbZ va'kdkyhu ,oa

vkdfLed dk;Z gsrq vko';drk gksus ij j[kk tkrk Fkk A vius

dFku esa ;g ekuk gS fd izkFkhZ ds o"kZ 1997 esa 'kiFk&i=k ds lkFk

layXu ifjf'k"V esa crk;s fuEu dk;Z&fnol Fks %&

o"kZ 1997

iQjojh

25 fnu

ekpZ

25 fnu

vizSy

25 fnu

ebZ

15 fnu

twu

14 fnu

tqykbZ

24 fnu

vxLr

21 fnu

vDVwcj

24 fnu

uoEcj

24 fnu

fnlEcj

19 fnu

dqy 192 fnol

18- vizkFkhZ }kjk o"kZ 1997 izkFkhZ ds dk;Z&fnolksa dk tks

fooj.k izn'kZ 1 esa crk;k x;k gS mlds vuqlkj ekg tuojh]

flrEcj ,oa uoEcj esa izkFkhZ ds dksbZ dk;Z&fnol ugha Fks A uoEcj

ds dk;Z&fnolksa dk tks fooj.k fn;k gS ij mlds vkxs dk;Z&fnolksa

dh tks vof/ vafdr dh gS mlls Li"V gS fd og dk;Z fnol

fnlEcj ds gSa A Jh nqxkZyky iq=k Jh lq[kkyky ds o"kZ 1997 ds

dk;Z&fnolksa dk fooj.k ifjf'k"V II eas n'kkZ;k x;k gS A mlds

vuqlkj tuojh] 97 es mlds 26 dk;Z fnol gSa rFkk flrEcj esa 29

dk;Z fnol Fks A blds vuqlkj o"kZ 1997 ds nks ekgesa Jh nqxkZyky

iq=k Jh lq[kkjke ds dk;Z fnol crk;s gS rFkk 'ks"k 10 esa Jh nqxkZyky

iq=k Jh lq[kkyky ds dk;Z fnol crk;s gSa A

19- ftl fjdkMZ ds vk/kj ij mDr ifjf'k"V I ,oa II esa

dk;Z fnol n'kkZ;s gSa] mUgsa vizkFkhZ }kjk is'k fd;k x;k gS A vizkFkhZ

}kjk izLrqr eLVj&jksy] LohÑfr vkns'k ,oa fcyksa ds voyksdu ls

;g izdV gksrk gS fd tks irk izkFkhZ dk vafdr fd;k gS ogh irk

dqN eLVj&jksy esa Jh nqxkZyky iq=k Jh lq[kkjke dk Hkh vafdr

fd;k gS A blds vykok Ex-W2 ,oa Ex- W2 ij Øe'k% nqxkZyky

iq=k Jh lq[kkyky ,oa nqxkZyky iq=k Jh lq[kkjke ds gLrk{kjksa esa

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4171

lekurk ds lUnHkZ esa vizkFkhz lk{kh ls izfrsijh{kk esa iwNus ij dgk

gS fd og ;g ugha dg ldrk fd ;g ,d gh O;fDr }kjk fd;s

x;s gS ;k ugha A mDr lk{kh us ;g ekuk gS fd mDr nksauks O;fDr;ksa

us ,d lkFk dk;Z ugha fd;k A mlus fliQZ fjdkMZ ds vk/kj ij

crk;k gS fd jsdkMZ Jh nqxkZhyky iq=k Jh lq[kkyky ,oa nqxkZyky

iq=k Jh lq[kkjke ds lEcU/ esa gS A nqxkZyky iq=k Jh lq[kkyky ,oa

nqxkZyky iq=k Jh lq[kkjke ds gLrk{kj okys tks izys[k is'k fd;s gSa

muds voyksdu ls Hkh buds gLrk{kjksa esa lekurk izrhr gksrh gS A

vr% izkFkhZ izfrfuf/ ds bl rdZ esa rks lkj izrhr gksrk gS fd

ifjf'k"V I ,Oka II esa tks dk;Z fnol crk;s x;s gSa og izkFkhZ ds gh

dk;Z fnol gS A

20- vizkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr ifjf'k"V I ,oa II esa o"kZ 1997 esa tks

dk;Z&fnol crk;s x;s gSa mUgsa tksM+us ij dk;Z &fnol rks 240 fnu

ls vf/d gks tkrs gS] ysfdu ;g dk;Z&fnol rc gh izklafxd gSa

tc izkFkhZ ;g fl¼ djus esa liQy jgrk gS fd fnukad 22&12&97

dks mls lsok ls gVk;k x;k Fkk A

21- izkFkhZ ds LVsVeSUV vkWiQ Dyse esa vfHkopu gS fd mls

lsok ls vizkFkhZ us fnukad 22&12&97 dks gVk fn;k ysfdu LVsVeSUV

vkWiQ Dyse esa ;g Hkh vfHkopu gS fd izkFkhZ vizkFkhZ ds v/hu

o"kZ 1990 ls 1999 rd fu;kstu esa jgk rFkk ml vof/ esa ,d o"kZ

esa 240 fnu ls vf/d lsok dk;Z esa jgrs gq, iwjs fd;s A izkFkhZ us

LVsVeSUV ds iSjk 4 esa Li"V :i ls dgk gS fd o"kZ 1998 ls 1999 esa

dk;Zjr jgk ftldk jsdkMZ vizkFkhZ ds ikl gS A izkFkhZ us vius

'kiFk&i=k eas Hkh mDr vfHkopuksa dks nksgjkrs gq, o"kZ 1998 ,oa

1999 esa Hkh dk;Zjr jguk crk;k gS A bl izdkj izkFkhZ ds vfHkopuksa

,oa lk{; esa bl egRoiw.kZ fcUnq ij fojks/kHkkl gS fd mlus o"kZ

1999 rd dk;Z fd;k Fkk ;k fnukad 22&12&97 rd] ;fn og o"kZ

1998 o o"kZ 1999 esa Hkh vizkFkhZ ds ;gka dk;Zjr Fkk rks mls fnukad

22&12&97 dks dk;Z ls gVkus okyh ckr lgh ugha gks ldrh A

22- vizkFkhZ us tks jsdkMZ izLrqr fd;k gS mlesa ifjf'k"V I esa

izkFkhZ ds fnlEcj 1997 esa fnukad 12&12&97 ls fnukad 30&12&97

dqy 19 dk;Z&fnol crk;s gSa A vizkFkhZ lk{kh us Hkh izfrijh{kk dgk

gS fd izkFkhZ us jsdkMZ ds vk/kj ij fnukad 12&12&97 ls 30&12&97

rd dk;Z fd;k Fkk A mlds vykok ifjf'k"V I esa jsdkMZ ds

vk/kj ij o"kZ 1998 esa tuojh] iQjojh] vizSy o twu esa Øe'k%

10] 12]14] 10 dk;Z fnol gksus n'kkZ;s gSa A mlh izdkj o"kZ 1999 esa

iQjojh ,oa ekpZ esa Øe'k% 5 ,oa 7 dk;Z&fnol gksus n'kkZ;s gSa A

ifjf'k"V II esa nqxkZyky iq=k Jh lq[kkjke ds o"kZ 1998 ds ekg

iQjojh esa 8 dk;Z&fnol ,oa o"kZ 1999 esa iQjojh] vizSy] ebZ ,oa

twu esa Øe'k% 10] 3] 20] 9 dk;Z&fnol n'kkZ;s gSa A ifjf'k"V I o

II eas tks dk;Z&fnol o"kZ 1998 o 1999 esa n'kkZ;s gSa mUgsa izkFkhZ ds gh

dk;Z&fnol ekuk tkos rks izkFkhZ us o"kZ 1998 ds ekg tuojh]

iQjojh] ekpZ] vizSy] twu esa Øe'k% 10] 16] 8] 14] 10 fnu dk;Z

fd;k Fkk rFkk o"kZ 1999 esa iQjojh] ekpZ] vizSy] ebZ] twu esa

Øe'k% 15] 17] 3] 20] 9 fnu dk;Z fd;k Fkk A

23- izkFkhZ }kjk ;g LohÑr rF; gS fd o"kZ 1998 ,oa 1999 esa

Hkh og dk;Zjr jgk Fkk ftldk fjdkMZ vizkFkhZ ds ikl gS A vizkFkhZ

us tks jsdkMZ o"kZ 1998 o 1999 dh vof/ dk is'k fd;k gS mlls

Hkh bl rF; dh iqf"V gksrh gS fd o"kZ 1998 ,oa 1999 esa Hkh izkFkhZ

vizkFkhZ ds fu;kstu esa dk;Zjr jgk gS A izkFkhZ dk ;g dsl ugha gS

fd fnukad 22&12&97 dks lsok ls gVkus ds ckn iqu% o"kZ 1998 esa

lsok esa j[k fy;k Fkk A izkFkhZ rks ;g dg dj vk;k gS fd mls

fnukad 22&12&97 dks lsok ls gVkus ds ckn vizkFkhZ us iqu% lsok esa

ysus dk volj iznku ugha fd;k A jsdkMZ ds vuqlkj izkFkhZ fnukad

30&12&97 rd dk;Zjr Fkk rFkk mlds ckn o"kZ 1998 ,oa 1999 esa

Hkh iwoZ esa mYysf[kr eghuksa esa vizkFkhZ ds ;gka dk;Zjr Fkk A

24- vr% izkFkhZ ;g lkfcr djus esa gh vliQy jgk gS fd

mls fnukad 22&12&97 dks lsok ls gVk x;k Fkk A blfy, o"kZ 1997

esa izkFkhZ 240 fnu ls vf/d dk;Zjr jgk gS rks Hkh /kjk 25 B(ii) ds

vUrxZr mldks ,d o"kZ dh ^fujUrj lsok* ugha ekuk tk ldrk

D;ksafd dfFkr frfFk 22&12&97 dks izkFkhZ dks lsok ls gVkuk gh

lkfcr ugha gks ldk gS A vr% ;g fcUnq izkFkhZ ds fojQ¼ r;

fd;k tkrk gS A

fcUnq la- 2

25- izkFkhZ dk dFku gS fd mls lsok ls gVkus ds i'pkr~

vizkFkhZ us /kjk 25 (H) dh vogsyuk djrs gq, ^iQhYM+ vnZyh* ds

in ij fdlh vU; dks j[k fy;k A /kjk 25 H ds izko/ku rc gh

ykxw gksrs gSa tc fdlh deZpkjh dh NaVuh dh xbZ gS izkFkhZ ;g

lkfcr djus esa gh vliQy jgk gS fd mldh NaVuh dfFkr frfFk

22&12&97 dks dh xbZ Fkh A blds vykok vizkFkhZ dks dFku gS fd

^iQhYM vnZyh* ds in ij mls volj u nsdj vU; dk lsok esa j[k

fy;k A izkFkhZ us Lo;a ;g dgk gS fd mls lk{kkRdkj gsrq cqyk;k

x;k Fkk A mlds vykok ftl in ij fu;qfDr fn;k tkuk crk;k

gS og in gh izkFkhZ ftl in ij dk;Zjr Fkk mlls fHkUu gS A tgka

lk{kkRdkj ds vk/kj ij izkFkhZ dks Hkh volj nsrs gq, vU; dh

fu;qfDr dh xbZ gks] ogka /kjk 25 H ds izko/ku ykxw ugha gksrs A

vr% izkFkhZ ;g lkfcr djus esa vliQy jgk gS fd vf/fu;e dh

/kjk 25 H ds izko/ku dk mYy?kau djrs gq, fdlh vU; O;fDr

dks fu;qfDr nh xbZ gS] vr% ;g fcUnq Hkh izkFkhZ ds fo#¼ r; fd;k

tkrk gS A

fcUnq la- 3

26- pwafd izkFkhZ ;g lkfcr djus esa vliQy jgk gS fd

vizkFkhZ us vf/fu;e dh /kjk 25 dk mYya?ku djrs gq, mls fnukad

22&12&97 dks lsok ls i`Fkd dj fn;k rFkk mlds ckn fu;kstu dk

volj fn, fcuk fdlh vU; dks /kjk 25 H ds izko/kuksa dk

mYya?ku djrs gq, fu;qfDr ns nh xbZ] blfy, izkFkhZ dksbZ vuqrks"k

izkIr djus dk vf/dkjh ugha gS A

27- mijksDr foospu ds vuqlkj ;g izekf.kr ugha gS fd

vizkFkhZ [kku fu;a=kd Hkkjrh; [kku C;wjks] vtesj }kjk izkFkhZ deZdkj

Jh nqxkZyky dks fnukad 22&2&97 dks voS/ ,oa vuqfpr :i ls

lsok esa c[kkZLr fd;k x;k Fkk A ifj.kkeLo:i] izkFkhZ dksbZ vuqrks"k

izkIr djus dk vf/dkjh ugha gS A U;k;fu.kZ;u gsrq izsf"kr funsZ'k dk

mÙkj mDr izdkj fn;k tkrk gS A iapkV rnuqlkj ikfjr fd;k

tkrk gS A

,u- ds- iqjksfgr] ihBklhu vf/dkjh

4172

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ubZ fnYyh] 10 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1588-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ , ,l

vkbZ ds çca/ra=k ds laca¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky; t;iqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 59@2005)

dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 10&07&2013 dks

çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹iQk- la- ,y&42012@128@2004&vkbZ vkj (lh ,e&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 10th July, 2013

S.O. 1588.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 59/2005)

of the Cent. Govt. Indus. Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,

Jaipur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute

between the management of archeological Survey of India,

and their workmen, received by the Central Government on

10-07-2013.

[ F. No. L- 42012/128/2004-IR (CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL

TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, JAIPUR

N. K. PUROHIT, Presiding Officer.

I.D. 59/2005

Reference No. L-42012/128/2004-(IR(CM-II)

dated : 24.5.2005

Sh. Umed Singh

S/o Shri Hanuman Singh Rao,

R/o Post Udaipurvati,

Jhunjhunu.

V/s

The Superintendent Archaeologist

Archeological Survey of India,

70/133-140, Patel Marg,

Mansoravar, Jaipur.

Present

For the applicant

:

Ex-party,

For the non-applicant

:

Sh. T. P. Sharma,

AWARD

29-4-2013

1. The Central Government in exercise of the powers

conferred under clause (d) of Sub Section 1 & 2(A) of

Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 has referred

the following Industrial dispute to this tribunal for

adjudication :—

“Whether the action of the management of

Archeological Survey of India, Jaipur in terminating

the services of Shri Umed Singh w.e.f. 21-9-1998 is

legal & justified? If not, to what relief workman is

entitled and from which date?

2. The workman in his claim statement has pleaded

that he had worked as class IV employee under the

non-applicant during period April, 97 to 20-9-98. He has

further pleaded that despite he had worked continuously

for 467 days’ during said period his services has been

terminated on 21-9-98 without assigning any reason in

violation of Section 25-F of the I.D.Act. The workman has

prayed for his reinstatement with all consequential benefits.

3. In reply, while denying the claim of the workman,

the non-applicant has contended that non-applicant

establishment is not an ‘industry’ as defined under Section

2-J of the Act. It has further been contended that the

workman was engaged as Beldar for temporary & casual

nature of work for repairing work of the Jagat Siromani

Temple. The workman was not employed against any post

& no appointment letter was given to him. It has also been

contended that the services of the workman were not

terminated by the non-applicant &, he had left the job for

better employment. Apart that, the work for which he was

engaged had been completed, therefore, the claim of the

workman be rejected.

4. Following points for determination were

framed :—

i. Whether the workman had continuously worked

from April, 97 to 20.9.98 under the employment of

the non- applicant establishment whose service

was terminated in violation of section 25-F of the

I.D. Act.

ii. Relief, if any.

5. In evidence, the workman has filed his affidavit in

support of his case. In rebuttal, the non-applicant has

filed the counter affidavit Prithviraj Singh, Superintendent,

Archeology, Jaipur region.

6. At the stage of final argument, none appeared on

behalf of the applicant, therefore, ex-party proceedings

were drawn against the workman.

7. The ld. Representative on behalf of the non-

applicant has submitted his written submissions.

8. The non-applicant in its reply has raised

preliminary objection that non-applicant Department is not

an 'industry' u/s 2-J of the I.D.Act but no point for

determination has been framed in this regard.

9. It has been contended on behalf of the non-

applicant that non-applicant Department does not come

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4173

under the purview of definition of an 'industry' u/s 2-J of

the I.D. Act in view of the nature of work of the Department.

He has further contended that non-applicant Department

is not doing any commercial activitiesand it is not

functioning for profit. He has also contended that in view

of the office memorandum of the Under Secretary, Govt.

of India, Ministry of Tourism No. 15-10/2001

Estt. Dated 15-9-2000, the non-applicant Department is

not an ‘industry’.

10. As per definition of ‘industry’ under section 2-J

of the I.D. Act any business, trade, undertaking,

manufacture, or calling of employers is an 'industry' and it

includes any calling, service, employment, handicraft, or

industrial occupation or avocation of workmen.

11. The definition of industry was dealt with by a

constitutional bench of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the

case of Banglore Water Supply case wherein the criteria

for determining the activity of an establishment as an

‘industry’ was laid down. It has been held that where there

is (i) Systematic activity (ii) Organized by Co-operation

between employer & employee (iii) for the production or

distribution of goods & services calculated to satisfy

human wants & wishes (not spiritual or religious but

including of material things). Prime facie, there is an

industry in the enterprise. Hon’ble Apex Court has

observed that absence of profit motive & objective is

irrelevant. The true focus is functional & decisive test is

the nature of the activity with special emphasis on the

employer employee relation.

12. In the present case, the office memorandum dated

15-9-2003 on the basis of which it has been contended

that non-applicant Department is not an ‘industry’ has

not peen brought on record. The management witness

has stated that the non-applicant Department is not doing

any commercial activities & the Department is functioning

without any profit motive & in view of the nature of work

it is not an 'industry'. But it is well settled that the absence

of profit motive or gainful object is irrelevant in this regard.

The decisive test is the nature of the activity. The nature

of work which has been stated by the management witness

is not such on the basis of which it can be said that the

non-applicant Department is exercising any sovereign

function. The work of the non-applicant Department is

not of such a nature which cannot be assigned to private

bodies. The non-applicant Department fulfills the criteria

laid down in the Banglore Water Supply case and it cannot

be exempted from the scope of section 2-J. Therefore, the

preliminary objection raised by the non-applicant in this

regard is not tenable.

Point No.1

13. To attract the provision of Section 25-F of

I.D. Act one of the conditions required is that the workman

is employed in any industry for a continuous period which

would not be less than one year.

14. The expression “continuous period” occur in

section 25-F has been defined in section 25-B of the

I.D. Act. Under sub- section (1) of the section 25-B, if a

workman has put in uninterrupted service of establishment

including the service which may be interrupted on account

of sickness, authorize leave, accident, a strike which is not

illegal, a lock out or secession of work that is not due to

any fault on the part of the workman shall be said to be

continuous service for one year i.e. 12 months in respect

of number of days he has actually worked with interrupted

service permissible under sub section (1) of section 25-B.

15. Sub section 2 of section 25-B of the LD. Act says

that even if a workman has not been in continuous service

for a period of one year as envisaged under sub-section

(1) of 25-B of LD.Act, he shall be deemed to have been in

such continuous service for a eriod of one year if he has

actually worked under the employer for 240 days in

preceding period of twelve months from the date of his

termination. The said sub-section provides for a fiction to

treat a workman in continuous service for a period of one

year despite the fact that he has not rendered uninterrupted

service for a period of one year.

16. In . the background of the legal provisions set

forth above, factual scenario in the present case is to be

examined.

17. The initial burden was on the workman to prove

that he had remained under the employment of the non-

applicant as a workman for a continuous period of at least

one year as envisaged u/s 25-F of the I.D.Act therefore,

his termination without notice or compensation in lieu of

notice was in violation of the said section.

18. It is not the case of the workman that he had

worked uninterruptedly for a period of one year as

envisaged under section 25-B(1) of the I.D.Act, therefore,

the question survives for consideration is whether the

workman had worked for at least 240 days during preceding

12 months from the date of his alleged termination.

19. The workman in his affidavit has deposed that

his services were terminated on 21-9-98, therefore, the

period of preceding 12 months from the date of his

termination is only relevant. Thus, it is to be seen whether

the workman had worked for at least 240 days during period

21-9-97 to 20-09-98.

20. The workman has stated that despite he had

continuously worked for 467 days during period April, 97

to Sep.98, his service was terminated on 21.9.98 in

contravention of the provisions of Section 25-F of the

I.D.Act.

21. In rebuttal, the management witness Sh. Prithviraj

Singh has stated that the workman was engaged

temporarily for casual nature work for repairing work of

temple. He was employed on 2.4.97 as daily wager unskilled

4174

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Beldar. He has further stated that no appointment letter

was given to the workman. He has also stated that the

work for which the workman was engaged had been

completed. He has further stated that services of the

workman were not terminated rather he himself had left

the job for better employment.

22. Vide order dated 29.3.06 directions were given to

the non-applicant Department to produce the muster rolls

of the period from April, 97 to 20.9.98. In compliance of the

said directions, the photocopies of attendance and

payment register for the period 2.4.97 to 31.8.98 have been

produced.

23. The number of actual working days during period

of preceding 12 months from the date of termination i.e.

from 21-9-97 to 20-9-98 stated by the workman in his

affidavit and number of working days during said period

as per record produced by the non-applicant are as below:-

Month & Year

As per

As per

Payment

statement

payment

@ 40/p. day

of the

register of

workman

Management

Sep, 97

26

25

1200

Oct, 97

27

27

1200

Nov, 97

26

26

1040

Dec, 97

27

26

1040

Jan, 98

27

27

1080

Feb, 98

24

24

960

March, 98

27

26

1040

April, 98

26

27

1080

May, 98

27

27

1080

June, 98

26

25

1000

July, 98

27

27

1080

Aug, 98

27

25

1000

Sep, 98

20

16

640

24. Thus, the statement of the workman that he had

worked for more than 240 days during preceding 12 months

from the date of termination finds support from the record

produced by the non-applicant. Admittedly, no notice,

notice pay or compensation was paid to the workman in

compliance of the provisions of the Section 25-F of the

ID. Act, therefore, termination of the workman being in

violation of provisions of Section 25-F is illegal.

Point No. II

25. Since, point no.1 has been decided against the

non-applicant and it has been concluded that termination

of the workman being in violation of Section 25-F of the

I.D. Act is illegal, it is to be seen what relief the workman

is entitled to.

26. This legal position is not in dispute that in case

of non compliance of section 25-F the workman can be

reinstated with other consequential reliefs.

27. Earlier in cases of termination in violation of

section 25-F reinstatement of the workman with full back

wages used to be automatically granted, but keeping in

view several other factors, a change in the said trend is

now found in the recent decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme

Court. In a large number of decisions in the matter of grant

of relief of the kind, Hon’ble Apex Court has distinguished

between a daily wager who does not hold a post and a

permanent employee.

28. In recent decision (2010) 1 SCC (L&S) 545 Jagbir

Singh V/s Haryana State Agriculture Mktg. Board after

considering the earlier decisions referred to therein on the

point should an order of reinstatement automatically

follows in a case of violation of Section 25-F of the I.D.Act

Hon'ble Apex Court has observed that : -

“It would be, thus seen that by a catena of decisions

in recent time, this Court has clearly laid down that

an order of retrenchment passed in violation of

Section 25-F although may be set aside but an award

of reinstatement should not, however, be

automatically passed. The award of reinstatement

with full back wages in a case where the workman

has completed 240 days of work in a year preceding

the date of termination, particularly, daily wagers

has not been found to be proper by this Court and

instead compensation has been awarded. This court

has distinguished between a daily wager who does

not hold a post and a permanent employee. ”

29. Continuing this line of approach in decision

(2010) 2 SCC (L&S) 376 Hon’ble Apex Court has observed

as under :-

“While the earlier view of the Court was that if an

order of termination was found to be illegal, normally

the relief to be granted would be reinstatement with

full back wages. However, with the passage of time

it came to be realized that an industry should not be

compelled to pay to the workman for the period

during which he apparently contributed little or

nothing at all. The relief to be granted is discretionary

and not automatic. A person is not entitled to get

something only because it would be lawful .to do

so. The changes brought out by the subsequent

decisions of the Supreme court probably having

regard to the changes in the policy decisions of the

Government in the wake of prevailing market

economy, globalization, privatization and

outsourcing was evident. Hence now there is no

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4175

such principle that for an illegal termination of

service the normal rule is reinstatement with back

wages, and instead the Labour court can award

compensation.”

“There has been a shift in the legal position

laid down by the Supreme Court and now there is no

hard-and-fast principle that on the termination of

service being found to be illegal reinstatement with

back wages is to be awarded. Compensation can be

awarded instead, at the discretion of the Labour

Court, depending on the facts and circumstances of

the case.”

30. In present matter, the workman has worked as

daily weger Beldar and he was getting Rs 40 per day as

wages. He was not holding any regular post. Keeping in

view the nature of job and nature of employment, the

delay in raising dispute, the laps of time after termination

of the services, the total length of service rendered by the

claimant and having regard the entire facts and

circumstances of the case, instead of reinstating him the

interest of justice will be sub served by paying

compensation to the workman instead and in lieu of relief

of reinstatement in service.

31. Accordingly, the reference is answered in

affirmative in favour of the workman and it is held that the

action of the management in termination of the services of

the workman being in violation of section 25-F of the Act

is illegal and unjustified. Therefore, the non-applicant is

directed to pay compensation to the workman worth Rs.

25000/-( Twenty Five Thousand Only) instead and in lieu

of his reinstatement of service. The payment shall be made

within eight weeks from the date of publication of the

award failing which it shall carry interest @ 8% per annum.

32. Award as above.

N. K. PUROHIT, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 10 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1589-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ ch lh

lh ,y ds çca/ra=k ds laca¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds

chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k

28@2001) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 10&07&2013

dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y&22012@26@2001&vkbZ vkj (lh ,e&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 10th July, 2013

S.O. 1589.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 28/2001)

of the Cent. Govt. Indus. Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,

Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial

dispute between the management of Victoria West Colliery,

and their workmen received by the Central Government

o

n

10-07-2013.

[No. L- 22012/26/2001-IR (CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

ASANSOL

PRESENT :

Sri Jyanta Kumar Sen, Presiding Officer

Reference No. 28 of 2001

PARTIES :

The management of Victoria West Colliery of. M/s.

ECL, Burdwan.

Vs.

The Jt. Secy., JCMC Asansol, Burdwan (W.B.)

REPRESENTATIVES :

For the Management

:

P.K. Das, Ld. Advocate

For the Union (Workman)

:

None

Industry : COAL

State : WEST BENGAL

Dated 15-05-2013

AWARD

In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-

section (1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), Govt. of India

through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No.

L-22012/26/2001-IR (CM-II) dated 30-08-2001 has been

pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by

this Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of Victoria

West Colliery of BCCL in deducting the wages for 8 days

in respect of Shri Mustaqeen Mia No. 2 and other Trammers

(list enclosed) for participation in strike on 15-07-1999 is

justified ? If not, to what relief the concerned workmen are

entitled to?”

Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/26/

2001-IR (CM-II) dated 30-08-2001 of the above said

reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour,

New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference case

No. 28 of 2001 was registered on 24-09-2001 and

accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue

notices through the registered post to the parties

concerned directing them to appear in the court on the

4176

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

date fixed and to file their written statements along with

the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support

of their claims. In pursuance of the said order notices by

the registered post were sent to the parties concerned.

On perusal of the case record, it has found that the

workman is neither appearing nor taking any step since

2006. Several opportunities were given but of no effect. It

seems that the workman is now not interested to proceed

with the case any further. Since the workman is not

interested to proceed with the case, the case is closed and

accordingly an order of “ No Dispute” award is hereby

passed.

ORDER

Let an “Award” be and the same is passed as “No

Dispute” existing. Send the copies of the order to the Govt.

of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for needful

information. The reference is accordingly disposed of.

JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 10 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1590-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ lh

,y ds çca/ra=k ds laca¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vlulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k

122@2005)dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks

10&07&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y&22012@380@2004 vkbZ vkj (lh ,e&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 10th July, 2013

S.O. 1590.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 122/

2005) of the Cent. Govt. Indus. Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, ASANSOL as shown in the Annexure, in the

industrial dispute between the management of M/s. Eastern

Coalfields Limited, and their workmen received by the

Central Government on 10-7-2013.

[ No. L- 22012/380/2004-IR (CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL

TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL

PRESENT : SRI JYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding

Officer.

Reference No. 122 of 2005

PARTIES :

The management of Kunustoria Colliery of. M/s.

ECL, Burdwan (WB)

Vs.

Sri Rakesh Kumar, Gen. Secretary, KMC, Asansol

(W.B.)

REPRESENTATIVES :

For the Management : Sri P.K. Das, Ld. Advocate

For the Union (Workman) : Sri Rakesh Kumar,

Ld. Representative

Industry : COAL

State : WEST BENGAL

Dated 03-06-2013

SETTLEMENT AWARD IN LOK ADALA T

HELD ON 03-06-13 AT KUNUSTORIA

GUEST HOUSE

In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-

section( I) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947( 14 of 1947), Govt. of India

through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No.

L-220 12/380/2004-I.R.(CM-II) dated 07.09.05 has been

pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by

this Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

‘‘Whether the action of the management of

Kunustoria Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields

Limited in dismissing Sh. Lakhan Kora, U.G. Loader

from service w.e.f. 31.7/2.8.2003 is legal and justified'!

If not, to what relief the concerned workman is

entitled ’’

Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/

380/2004-I.R.(CM-ll) dated 7-9-05 of the above said

reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New

Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference case No.

122 of 2005 was registered on 23-09-2005 and accordingly

an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through

the registered post to the parties concerned directing them

to appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their

written statements along with the relevant documents and

a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance

of the said order notices by the registered post were sent

to the parties concerned.

On amicable settlement by both parties the dispute

is resolved in the Lok Adalat. The form 'H' containing the

terms of agreement of this settlement to be executed by

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4177

both the parties in due course. Award is passed and signed

accordingly.

ORDER

Let an "Award" be and same is passed as per above

discussion. Form 'H' containing terms and conditions does

form as an integral part of the Award. Send the copies of

the award to the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour &

Employment, New Delhi for information and needful. The

reference is accordingly disposed of.

JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 10 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1591-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ lh

,y ds çca/ra=k ds laca¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky; vlulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 05@2001)

dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 10&7&2013 dks çkIr

gqvk Fkk A

¹iQk- la- ,y&22012@453@1999&vkbZ vkj (lh ,e&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 10th July, 2013

S.O. 1591.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 05/

2001) of the Cent. Govt. Indus. Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, ASANSOL as shown in the Annexure, in the

industrial dispute between the management of Kunustorial

Colliery, M/s. E.C. Limited, and their workmen received by

the Central Government on 10-07-2013.

[ F. No. L- 22012/453/1999-IR (CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL

TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL

PRESENT : SRI JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding

Officer.

Reference No. 05 of 2001

PARTIES : The management of Kunustorial Colliery of

M/s. ECL, Burdwan

Vs.

The Gen. Secy., KMC, Asansol (WB)

REPRESENTATIVES:

For the Management : Shri P.K. Das, Ld. Advocate

For the union (Workman) : Shri H. L. Soni,

Ld. Representative

INDUSTRY: COAL STATE: WEST BENGAL

Dated - 14-03-13

AWARD

In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of

Sub-section(1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947), Govt. of India

through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L-22012/

453/99-IR(C-II) dated 05-02-2001 has been pleased to refer

the following dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

‘‘Whether the action of the management of

Kunustorial Colliery under ECL, P.O. Toposi, Dist.

Burdwan denying offer of employment to the

dependent of Kujrath Khan, Ex-Tyndel is justified?

If not, to what relief the workman is entitled?’’

Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/

453/99-IR(C-II) dated 05-02-2001 of the above said reference

from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for

adjudication of the dispute, a reference case No. 05 of

2001 was registered on 15.02.2001 and accordingly an order

to that effect was passed to issue notices through the

registered post to the parties concerned directing them to

appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their written

statements along with the relevant documents and a list

of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance of

the said order notices by the registered post were sent to

the parties concerned.

It is an admitted fact that Kujrath Khan was an

Ex-Tyndel in Kunustorial Colliery under ECL, P.O. Toposi,

Dist. - Burdwan. It is also an admitted fact that the Services

of the workman were terminated on the medical ground

with effect from 07-03-1990 on the basis of the repost of

Medical Board constituted by the Management, dated

21-01-1990. After dismissal the management advised

Kujrath Khan to submit application with documental

evidence for employment of his dependant son. It further

appears from the record that the matter of employment of

Jainul Khan, S/o. Kujrath Khan was taken up by the

Management vide Reference No. A. KNT/P & IA/R/1105

dated 23-04-1990 by personal Manager of Kunustoria

Area, and accordingly notices were issued to Jainul Khan,

S/o. Kujrath Khan (SI. No. 16) along with other employee.

It has been submitted on behalf of the employer nor he

had submitted all the documents before the Management

for the employment of Jainul Khan, the dependant son for

employment in place of the workman Kujrath Khan, and

the same was scrutanised screened on Area Level on

30-04-1990 and Jainul Khan was medically examined (pre-

employment) and found fit for employment, and the

employment proposal was sent to Head-Quarter by the

4178

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Area Office under their Letter No. A/KNT/P & IR/NS/17/

7607 dated 17-09-1990 followed by the reminder but

unfortunately the employment file was lost in transit by

the Management.

On perusal of the record I find that it is true that the

original employment file of Kujrath Khan was processed

by the Area and the said HQs, but subsequently the original

file lost during transit (Ref. No. ECL/CMD/C-6E/96/20/96

dated 29-01-96, issued from C.M.D. Office, Sanctoria, ECL.

It further appears that even after several reminders no

action has been taken by the Management for not

complying the order against the concerning officer for

lost of the employment file and about 17 years passed and

the dependant son has not got employment till yet. Really

it is great slackness of the part of Management for not

providing job to the son of the Ex-employee, Kujrath Khan,

and he has to knock the door of justice. The action of the

Management is no doubt against the "Natural justice

specially when the son of Kujrath Khan was found

medically fit for employment I find that the Management

also did not bother to furnish the documents and produce

the same before this Tribunal.

Thus I find that the action of the Management of

Kunustorial Colliery, under ECL, P.O.- Toposi, Dist-

Burdwan denying offer of employment to Jainul Khan,

dependant son of Kujrath Khan, is totally arbitrarily and

is against the provision of law and is unjustified. So, in my

opinion the action taken by the Management is hereby

set aside.

Management is advised to give employment to Jainul

Khan dependant son of Kujrath Khan within three months

from the date of Notification after complying all the

formalities.

ORDER

Let an "Award" be and the same is passed as per

above discussion. Send the copies of the order to the

Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for

information and needful. The reference is accordingly

disposed of.

JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 10 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1592-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ lh

,y ds çca/ra=k ds laca¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky; vlulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 19@2012)

dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 10&07&2013 dks

çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y&22012@32@2012&vkbZ vkj (lh ,e&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 10th July, 2013

S.O. 1592.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 19/

2012) of the Cent. Govt. Indus. Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, ASANSOL as shown in the Annexure, in the

industrial dispute between the management of J. K. Nagar

Colliery, M/s. E.C. Limited, and their workmen received by

the Central Government on 10-07-2013.

[ No. L- 22012/32/2012-IR (CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL

TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL

PRESENT : Sri Jayanta Kumar Sen, Presiding Officer.

Reference No. 19 of 2012

PARTIES :The management of J. K. Nagar Colliery Satgram

Area of M/s. ECL, Burdwan

Vs.

Sri D. K. Routh, Branch Jt. Secy.,CMC (HMS),

Asansol Burdwan (WB).

REPRESENTATIVES :

For the Management : Sri P. K. Goswami,

Ld. Advocate

For the Union (Workman) : None

Industry : COAL State :WEST BENGAL

Dated 25-04-2013

AWARD

In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-

section(1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the

I ndustrial Disputes Act, 1947( 14 of 1947), Govt. of India

through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No.

L-22012/32/2012-I.R.(CM-II) dated 19-04-2012 has been

pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by

this Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

‘‘Whether the action of the management of J. K.

Nagar Colliery of M/s. ECL in not payment HRA @

10% of Basic Pay to Sri Tohir Ahamad is fair and

justified? To what relief the concerned workman is

entitled? ’’

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4179

Having received the Order of Letter No.L-22012/32/

2012-I.R.(CM-ll) dated 19-04-2012 of the above said

reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New

Delhi for adjudication of the dispute. a reference case No.

19 of 2012 was registered on 8-05-12 and accordingly an

order to that effect was passed to issue notices through

the registered post to the parties concerned directing them

to appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their

written statements along with the relevant documents and

a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance

of the said order notices by.the registered post were sent

to the parties concerned.

On perusal of the case record. it has been found that

Sri D. K. Routh, Branch Jt. Secretary of the Union, submits

that the workman is not interested to proceed with the

case and further prayed for the closure of the case. Since

the workman is not interested to proceed with the case,

the case is closed and accordingly an order ‘‘No Dispute’’

award is hereby passed.

ORDER

Let an "Award" be and the same is passed as ‘‘No

Dispute’’ existing. Send the copies of the order to the

Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for

needful and information. The reference is accordingly

disposed of.

JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 10 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1593-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ lh

,y ds çca/ra=k ds laca¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky; vlulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 33@1998)

dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 10&07&2013 dks

çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y&22012@328@1997&vkbZ vkj (lh ,e&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 10th July, 2013

S.O. 1593.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 33/

1998) of the Cent. Govt. Indus. Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, ASANSOL as shown in the Annexure, in the

industrial dispute between the management of Madhujore

Colliery, M/s. E.C. Limited, and their workmen received by

the Central Government on 10-07-2013.

[No. L- 22012/328/1997-IR (CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL

TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL

PRESENT : Sri Jayanta Kumar Sen, Presiding Officer.

Reference No. 33 of 1998

PARTIES : The management of Madhujore Colliery,

M/s. ECL, Burdwan

Vs.

The Gen. Secy., KMC, Asansol Burdwan (WB)

REPRESENTATIVES :

For the Management : None

For the Union (Workman) : Sri Rakesh Kumar,

Ld. Representative

Industry : COAL State :WEST BENGAL

Dated 14-05-2013

AWARD

In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-

section(1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the

I ndustrial Disputes Act, 1947( 14 of 1947), Govt. of India

through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No.

L-22012/328/97-I.R.(CM-II) dated 23-07-1998 has been

pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by

this Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

‘‘Whether the action of the management of

Madhujore Colliery of M/s. ECL in not regularising

the services of Sh. Murtja Ali, Shadat Mia, Bhola

Shaw and R. K. Singh as security Guards is legal

and justified? To what relief the concerned workman

is entitled? ’’

Having received the Order of Letter No.L-22012/328/

97-I.R.(CM-ll) dated 23-07-1998 of the above said reference

from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for

adjudication of the dispute. a reference case No. 33 of

1998 was registered on 10-08-1998 and accordingly an order

to that effect was passed to issue notices through the

registered post to the parties concerned directing them to

appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their written

statements along with the relevant documents and a list

of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance of

the said order notices by the registered post were sent to

the parties concerned.

On perusal of the case record. it has been found that

Sri Rakesh Kumar, General Secretary of the Union, submits

that the workman are not interested to proceed with the

case and further prayed for the closure of the case. Since

the workman are not interested to proceed with the case,

the case is closed and accordingly an order ‘‘No Dispute’’

award is hereby passed.

ORDER

Let an "Award" be and the same is passed as ‘‘No

Dispute’’ existing. Send the copies of the order to the

Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for

needful information. The reference is accordingly

disposed of.

JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer

4180

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ubZ fnYyh] 10 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1594-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZlh,y

ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k

37@2000) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 10&7&2013

dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y&22012@330@1999&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 10th July, 2013

S.O. 1594.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 37/

2000) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the

Industrial Dispute between the management of Khandra

Colliery, M/s. E.C. Ltd. and their workmen, received by the

Central Government on 10-7-2013.

[No. L- 22012/330/1999-IR (CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

ASANSOL

Present : SRI JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, PRESIDING OFFICER,

REFERENCE NO. 37 OF 2000

Parties :

The management of Khandra Colliery

of M/s. ECL, Burdwan

VS.

The Gen. Secy., UCMU(INTUC),

Ukhra, Burdwan ((W.B.)

Representatives :

For the Management

:

Sh. P. K. Das,

Ld. Advocate.

For the Union (Workman)

:

None

Industry : Coal

State : West Bengal

Dated : 21-5-2013

AWARD

In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-

section (1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), Govt. of India

through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L-22012/

330/99-IR(CM-II) dated 07-03-2000 has been pleased to

refer the following dispute for adjudication by this

Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of Khandra

Colliery of M/s. ECL in not regularising Sh. Swapan

Dutta, Mining Trainee as Magazine Issue Clerk, since

6-05-1995 and not paying the differential wages is

legal and j ustified? If not, what relief the workman

is entitled to?”

Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/

330/99-IR (CM-II) dated 07.03.2000 of the above said

reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New

Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference case No.

37 of 2000 was registered on 18.04.2000 and accordingly

an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through

the registered post to the parties concerned directing them

to appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their

written statements along with the relevant documents and

a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance

of the said order notices by the registered post were sent

to the parties concerned.

On perusal of the case record, it has found that the

Union is neither appearing nor taking any step since 2008.

It seems that the workman is now not interested to proceed

with the case any further. The case is also too old of the

year 2000. Since the workman is not interested to proceed

with the case, the case is closed and accordingly an order

of ‘‘No Dispute’’ award is hereby passed.

ORDER

Let an “Award” be and the same is passed as “No

Dispute” existing. Send the copies of the order to the Govt.

of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for needful

information. The reference is accordingly disposed of.

JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 10 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1595-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZlh,y

ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k

40@2006) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 10&7&2013

dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y&22012@242@2005&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 10th July, 2013

S.O. 1595.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 40/

2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the

Industrial Dispute between the management of North

Searsole Colliery of M/s. E.C. L. and their workmen, received

by the Central Government on 10-7-2013.

[No. L- 22012/242/2005-IR (CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4181

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

ASANSOL

Present : SRI JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, PRESIDING OFFICER,

REFERENCE NO. 40 OF 2006

Parties :

The management of North Searsole

Colliery of M/s. ECL, Burdwan (WB)

Vs.

Sri S.K. Pandey, Gen. Secy., KMC,

Asansol (WB)

Representatives :

For the Management

:

Sh. P. K. Das,

Ld. Advocate.

For the Union (Workman)

:

Sri S. K. Pandey,

Ld. Representative

Industry : Coal

State : West Bengal

Dated : 3-6-2013

SETTLEMENT AWARD IN LOK ADALAT HELD ON

03-06-13 AT KUNUSTORIA GUEST HOUSE

In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-

sectiont (1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section l0 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947( 14 of 1947) Govt. of India

through the Ministry of Labour, vide its Order No. L-22012/

242/2005-I.R.(CM-II) dated 2-08-2006 has been pleased to

refer the following dispute for adjudication by this

Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of North

Searsole Colliery under Kunustoria Area of

M/s. Eastern Coalfields Ltd. in dismissing Sh. Sukhlal

Majhi, U.G. Loader from service w.e.f. 8-04-2002 is

justified? If not, to what relief is the workman

entitled ?”

Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/

242/2005-IR(CM-II) dated 2-8-2006 of the above said

reference from the Government of India, Ministry of

Labour, New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a

reference case No. 40 of 2006 was registered on 14-8-2006

and accordingly an order to that effect was passed to

issue notices through the registered post to the parties

concerned directing them to appear in the court on the

date fixed and to file their written statements along with

the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support

of their claims. In pursuance of the said order notices by

the registered post were sent to the parties concerned.

On amicable settlement by both parties the dispute

is resolved in the Lok Adalat. The Form ‘H’ containing the

terms of agreement of this settlement to be executed by

both the parties in due course. Award is passed and signed

accordingly.

ORDER

Let an “Award” be and same is passed as per above

discussion. Form ‘H’ containing terms and conditions does

form as an integral part of the Award. Send the copies of

the award to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour

and Employment, New Delhi for information and needful.

The reference is accordingly disposed of.

JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 10 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1596-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZlh,y

ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k

80@2000) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 10&7&2013

dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y&22012@42@2000&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 10th July, 2013

S.O. 1596.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 80/

2000) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the

Industrial Dispute between the management of

Ghanshyampur Colliery, M/s. E.C. Ltd. and their workmen,

received by the Central Government on 10-7-2013.

[No. L- 22012/42/2005-IR (CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

ASANSOL

Present : SRI JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, PRESIDING OFFICER,

REFERENCE NO. 80 OF 2000

Parties :

The management of Ghanshyampur

Colliery of M/s. ECL, Burdwan

Vs.

The Jt. Gen. Secy., CMU, Ukhra,

Burdwan (WB)

Representatives :

For the Management

:

Sh. P. K. Goswami,

Ld. Advocate.

For the union (Workman)

:

None

Industry : Coal

State : West Bengal

Dated : 29-5-2013

4182

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

AWARD

In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-

section(l) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947( 14 of 1947), Govt. of India

through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L-22012/

42/2000-IR(CM-II) dated 21.08.2000 has been pleased to

refer the following dispute for adjudication by this

Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of

Ghanshyampur Colliery of M/s. ECL in dismissing

Sh. Ramani Bhuia, Underground Loader from

services is legal and justified? If not, to what relief

the workman is entitled?”

Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/42/

2000-IR(CM-II) dated 21.08.2000 of the above said

reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New

Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference case No.

80 of 2000 was registered on 06.09.2000 and accordingly

an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through

the registered post to the parties concerned directing them

to appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their

written statements along with the relevant documents and

a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance

of the said order notices by the registered post were sent

to the parties concerned.

On perusal of the case record, it has found that the

workman is neither appearing nor taking any step since

15.01.2008. It seems that the workman is now not interested

to proceed with the case any further. The case is also too

old - of the year 2000. Since the workman is not interested

to proceed with the case, the case is closed and accordingly

an order of “No Dispute” award is hereby passed.

ORDER

Let an “Award” be and the same is passed as “No

Dispute” existing. Send the copies of the order to the Govt.

of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for needful

information. The reference is accordingly disposed of.

JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 10 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk-1597-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZlh,y

ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k

18@2004) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 10&7&2013

dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y 22012@137@2003&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 10th July, 2013

S.O. 1597.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 18/

2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the

Industrial Dispute between the management of Dalurband

Colliery, M/s. Eastern Coalfields Ltd. and their workmen,

received by the Central Government on 10-7-2013.

[No. L- 22012/137/2003-IR (CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

ASANSOL

Present : SRI JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer,

Reference No. 18 of 2004

Parties :

The management of Dalurband

Colliery of M/s. ECL, Burdwan

Vs.

The Gen.Secy., KMC, Asansol,

Burdwan (WB)

Representatives :

For the Management

:

Sh. P. K. Das,

Ld. Advocates.

For the Union (Workman)

:

Sri S. K. Pandey,

Ld. Representative

Industry : Coal

State : West Bengal

Dated : 17-4-2013

AWARD

In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-

section (1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), Govt. of India

through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L-22012/

137/2003-IR.(CM-II) dated 25.02.2004 has been pleased to

refer the following dispute for adjudication by this

Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of

Dalurband Colliery under Pandaveshwar Area of

M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited in dismissing Sri

Lachman Bhuiya, U.G. Loader from service vide letter

no. DC/589 dated 18/20.5.99 is legal and justified? lf

not, to what relief he is entitled to?”

(1) Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/

137/2003-IR (CM-II) dated 25.02.2004 of the above said

reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New

Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference case No.

18 of 2004 was regitered on 22.03.04 and accordingly an

order to that effect was passed to issue notices through

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4183

the registered post to the parties concerned directing them

to appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their

written statements along with the relevant documents and

a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance

of the said order notices by the registered post were sent

to the parties concerned. Sri P. K. Das, Advocate and

Sri S. K. Pandey, General Secretary of the union appeared

in the Court to represent the management and the Union

respectively. The written statement on behalf of both the

parties were filed in support of their respective claims.

(2) In brief compass the case of the union as set

forth in its written statement is that Sh. Lachman Bhuiya

was the permanent employee of the company as Under

Ground Loader at Dalurband Colliery, Pandaveshwar Area

of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited. The main case of the

union is that he absented from his duty w.e.f. 18-12-98 and

that due to sickness and being declared fit the workman

reported to the management but he was not allowed to

resume his duty. The workman was simply informed that

his service have been terminated. It is also the case of the

union that in spite of the fact that the workman kept

informed to the management about his sickness even then

he was charge sheeted for alleged unauthorized absence

from duty. The workman was not served with the copy of

the charge sheet, notice of enquiry etc. as such the

principles of natural justice was denied to him and the

dismissal of the workman concerned from the service of

the company is illegal and unjustified. A relief for his

reinstatement in his service with all consequential benefits

arising there from with effect from the date of his dismissal

has been sought for.

(3) On the other hand the defence case of the

management as per the averments of the pleadings in short

is that Lachman Bhuiya of Dalurband Colliery had absented

from his duties since 18-12-98 without any permission or

even information to the competent authority. The further

case of the management is that the workman concerned

had not been very regular in attending his duties to inspire

confidence of the management for which the employer

issued to him the charge sheet dated 8-1-99 for habitual

absenteeism but Sh. Bhuiya did not give any reply to the

said charge sheet. Subsequently an Enquiry Officer was

appointed to conduct the domestic enquiry.

(4) It is also the defence case of the management

that three notices had been served fixing different date at

regular interval to the home address of the workman but

no response was received and ultimately ex-parte enquiry

was conducted, so the enquiry proceeding should be

deemed to be conducted in compliance of the natural

justice. The enquiry officer is claimed to have hold the

workman guilty for the charges established and on that

account having considered the gravit of the charges and

the misconduct the workman was dismissed from his

service on 18-5-99. The management has claimed the

dismissal order of the workman to be fair and proper and

the workman is not entitled to any relief.

(5) Earlier the Presiding Officer Md. Sarfaraz Khan

has passed “Award” dated 18-7-2007 by which the Learned

Presiding Officer has been pleased to uphold the

punishment against the workman Lachman Bhuiya by

Award dated 18-7-2007.

(6) The workman has filed one writ (W.P. 663 of

2008) before the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. The

Hon’ble Court by its judgement dated 14th June, 2010

have been pleased to set aside the part of the order

regarding punishment with a direction to this Tribunal to

pass a reasoned order regarding the punishment after

taking into account the principle as started to this duration.

On perusal of the order of his Hon’ble Court in the above

mention writ (W.P. 663 of 2008) passed on 14th June 2010,

I find that the Hon’ble Court have been pleased to

observe :—

“I am not satisfied with the finding regarding

punishment. In 1996 there is absence of 69 days, in

1997 of 50 days and in 1998 of 20 days. Punishment

should be proportionate to the guilt. It should never

be excessive. It ought not to be such as would sound

unreasonable. After all, there is the question of

employment of a workman who is earning income

from that employment of a workman who is earning

income from that employment and maintaining his

family. Dismissal from employment is bound to create

great financial hardship to him and his family. In

some cases, this hardship becomes permanent

because of unavailability of alternative employment”.

(7) On behalf of the union on decision of the

Hon’ble Apex Court reported in 2012 (135) F.L.R. 743 [Civil

Appeal No. 4221 of 2011 — Rajasthan Tourism

Development Corporation Limited & another Vrs. Jai Raj

Singh Chouhan] has been filed, and from perusal of the

present ruling of the Hon’ble Apex Court, I find that the

Hon’ble Apex Court has also of the view that on the ground

of remaining absent beyond the period of Leave - dismissal

from service is not proper and against the “Natural Justice”.

(8) Hence considering the observable made by the

Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta, referred above, and keep in

mind the decision of the Hon’ble Apex Court, I am of the

opinion that not only on the ground of above absent for

same period (69 days in 1996, 50 days in 1997 and 20 days

in 1998) the Management should not throw the employee

on the street for purpose of begging with his all family

members by dismissing him from service, and it seems to

be against the principle of “Natural Justice”. But the

negligence on the past of workman shows that it caused

hamper in production work for which the workman is liable

for some punishment.

(9) Accordingly the action of the Management of

Dalurband Colliery under Pandeveswar Area of M/s. ECL

in dismissing Sri Lachman Bhuiya, U.G. Loader from service

vide Letter No. DC/589 dated 18/20-5-99 is in my opinion is

not legal and justified, and the order of dismissal passed

4184

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

by the Management is hereby set aside. The Management

is directed to reinstate the workman Dular Chand Bhuiya,

U.G. Loader from the date of dismissal 18/20-5-99 with

stoppage of two increment and withheld of 50% back

wages, and of accordingly “Award” be issued.

ORDER

Let an “Award” be and the same is passed as per

above. Send the copies of the “Award” to the Government

of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment, New Delhi for

information and needful.

JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 10 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1598-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZlh,y

ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vlulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k

28@2012) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 10&7&2013

dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y&22012@70@2012&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 10th July, 2013

S.O. 1598.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 28/

2012) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the

Industrial Dispute between the management of J. K. Nagar

Colliery Satgram Area, M/s. E.C. Ltd. and their workmen,

received by the Central Government on 10-7-2013.

[No. L- 22012/70/2012-IR (CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

ASANSOL

Present : Sri Jayanta Kumar Sen, Presiding Officer

Reference No. 28 of 2012

Parties :

The management of J. K. Nagar

Colliery, Satgram Area of M/s. ECL,

Burdwan

Vs.

Sri D. K. Routh, Branch Jt. Secy.,

CMC(HMS), Asansol, Burdwan (WB)

Representatives :

For the Management

:

None

For the Union (Workman)

:

None

Industry : Coal

State : West Bengal

Dated : 16-5-2013

AWARD

In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-

section (1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), Govt. of India

through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L-22012/

70/2012-IR(CM-II) dated 18.5.2012 has been pleased to refer

the following dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of J. K.

Nagar Colliery of M/s. ECL. in not payment HRA @

10% of Basic Pay to Sri Ramachandra Ram Dusadh

is fair and justified? To what relief the concerned

workman is entitled to?”

Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/70/

2012-IR (CM-II) dated 18.05.2012 of the above said

reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New

Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference case No.

28 of 2012 was registered on 25.06.2012 and accordingly

an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through

the registered post to the parties concerned directing them

to appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their

written statements alongwith the relevant documents and

a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance

of the said order notices by the registered post were sent

to the parties concerned.

On perusal of the case record, it has been found that

Sri D. K. Routh, Branch Jt. Secretary of the Union, submits

that the workman is now not interested to proceed with

the case and further prayed for the closure of the case.

Since the workman is not interested to proceed with the

case, the case is closed and accordingly an order of “No

Dispute” award is hereby passed.

ORDER

Let an “Award” be and the same is passed as “No

Dispute” existing. Send the copies of the order to the Govt.

of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for needful

information. The reference is accordingly disposed of.

JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 10 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1599-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZlh,y

ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k

38@2003) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 10&7&2013

dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y&22012@300@2002&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4185

New Delhi, the 10th July, 2013

S.O. 1599.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 38/

2003) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the

Industrial Dispute between the management of M/s.

Eastern Coalfields Ltd., and their workmen, received by

the Central Government on 10-7-2013.

[No. L- 22012/300/2002-IR (CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

ASANSOL

Present : Sri Jayanta Kumar Sen, Presiding Officer

Reference No. 38 of 2003

Parties :

The management of Chapuikhas

Colliery of M/s. ECL, Burdwan

Vs.

The Gen.Secy., KMC, Asansol (WB)

Representatives :

For the Management

:

Sh. P. K. Das,

Ld. Advocate.

For the Union (Workman)

:

Sri S. K. Pandey,

Ld. Representative

Industry : Coal

State : West Bengal

Dated : 15-03-2013

AWARD

In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-

section (1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), Govt. of India

through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L-22012/

300/2002-IR(CM-II) dated 16.10.2003 has been pleased to

refer the following dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of

Chapuikhas in dismissing Sri Lala Bouri, Underground

Loader from service is legal and justified? If not, to what

relief the workman is entitled?”

Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/

300/2002-IR(CM-II) dated 16.10.2003 of the above said

reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour,

New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference case

No. 38 of 2003 was registered on 04.11.2003 and accordingly

an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through

the registered post to the parties concerned directing them

to appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their

written statements along with the relevant documents and

a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance

of the said order notices by the registered post were sent

to the parties concerned.

It appears from the Enquiry Report as well as record

that the workman Lala Bouri, Underground Loader was

dismissed from service due to unauthorized absent only

for Five months i.e. from 02.09.99 to 16.02.2000. It appears

from the Enquiry Report that on 02.09.99 the workman

Lala Bouri felt chest pain and he rushed to Sub-Divisional

Hospital, Asansol, for treatment. The Enquiry Officer

discarded the plea of workman on the ground that he did

not approach the ECL Doctor for treatment nor inform the

Management regarding such illness. It appears from the

record that the workman Lala Bouri was also treated by

the doctor of Central Institute of Psychiatry, Ranchi-

Photocopy of Discharge Certificate filed.

Since the workman Lala Bouri absented from duty

only for Five months due to his illness, so in my opinion

the action of the Management against Lala Bouri is very

harsh, because it appears that he was ill at that time. The

only fault of the workman is that he did not go to ECL

Hospital for treatment and did not inform the Management

regarding his illness in time. But only on this ground the

Management should not award death penalty to the

workman by dismissing him from service and throw all the

family members on street for begging which is against the

provision of “Natural Justice”.

Hence the action of the Management of Chapuikhas

Colliery in dismissing Lala Bouri, Underground Loader

from service is, in my opinion, totally illegal and unjustified.

Accordingly the Order of dismissal is hereby set

aside. The Management is directed to allow the workman

Lala Bouri to join in the service with 75 percentage of back

wages within three months from the date of Notification.

ORDER

Let an “Award” be and the same is passed as per

above discussion. Send the copies of the order to the

Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for

information and needful. The reference is accordingly

disposed of.

JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 10 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1600-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZlh,y

ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k

44@2006) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 10&7&2013

dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y&22012@244@2005&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

4186

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 10th July, 2013

S.O. 1600.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 44/

2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the

Industrial Dispute between the management of North

Searsole Colliery of M/s. E.C. L. and their workmen, received

by the Central Government on 10-7-2013.

[No. L- 22012/244/2005-IR (CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

ASANSOL

Present : SRI JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer,

Reference No. 44 of 2006

Parties :

The management of North Searsole

Colliery of M/s. ECL, Burdwan

Vs.

The Org. Secy., CRMS (BMM),

Burdwan (WB)

Representatives :

For the Management

:

Sh. P. K. Goswami,

Ld. Advocate.

For the Union (Workman)

:

Sri M. K. Bandopadhaya,

Ld. Representative

Industry : Coal

State : West Bengal

Dated : 07-05-2013

AWARD

In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-

section (1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), Govt. of India

through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L-22012/

244/2005-IR(CM-II) dated 02.08.2006 has been pleased to

refer the following dispute for adjudication by this

Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of North

Searsole Colliery under Kunustoria Area of M/s. E.

C. Ltd. in dismissing Sri Ramdaras Harijan, U.G.

Loader w.e.f. 10.07.2001 is justified? If not, to what

relief is the workman entitled?”

Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/

244/2005-IR (CM-II) dated 02.08.2006 of the above said

reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New

Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference case No.

44 of 2006 was registered on 14.08.2006 and accordingly

an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through

the registered post to the parties concerned directing them

to appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their

written statements along with the relevant documents and

a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance

of the said order notices by the registered post were sent

to the parties concerned.

It is an admitted fact that the workman remained

absent from his duty from 26.08.2001 to 25.02.2001 and he

did not inform the Management about this absence (Para

3 and 4 of affidavit). Regarding treatment the workman

produce a photocopy of Medical Certificate granted by

one Dr. S.K. Mukherjee, a private homeopathic doctor,

from which it appears that the workman was suffering from

Mental depression. The workman never treated himself

by any Colliery Central Hospital where there are sufficient

amenities and there are number of experienced Doctors.

Moreover, the Dr. S.K. Mukherjee also did not turn up for

evidence to support the fact that he treated the workman

as well as to prove the Medical Certificate granted by him.

So in my opinion much reliance cannot be given on this

very Medical Certificate. It further appears from the record

that on 25.02.2001 after found him find long absent without

any information, he (workman) was charge-sheeted under

Ref. ECL/NS/P&I R/3478 dated 25.02.2001, and as because

the workman did not appear to face the enquiry even after

notice, as exparte enquiry was held and he was found

guilty as per charge-sheet and accordingly his service

was terminated on 01.07.2001. I am surprised to see that

the workman did not take any action soon after his

dismissal and remain idle for more than three years, and all

of a sudden the Union raised the dispute on 10.11.2004.

No cogent reason has been assigned by the Union

regarding such delay in raising the dispute. Moreover, I

find that the workman in his affidavit (examination-in-chief)

has also not stated about any cogent reason for not taking

any steps soon after the knowledge of dismissal rather

slept for more than three years.

Further from the cross-examination of the workman

(Para 13, dt. 09.09.2001) I find that the workman has already

come his age of superannuation in the month of April,

2010.

Considering the whole fact circumstances of the case

as well as the evidence of the workman and the document

filed on his behalf, keeping in view the long delay (more

than three years) in raising the dispute, I am of the opinion

that the workman has failed to prove his claim before this

Tribunal beyond all shadows of reasonable doubts. And

in my opinion the workman Ramdaras Harijan is not entitled

to get any relief as prayed. However, the workman is entitled

to get his dues which he would be entitled after normal

superannuation, to save his family members from

starvation keeping in view the provision of “Natural

Justice.”

ORDER

Let an “Award” be and the same is passed as per

above discussion. Send the copies of the order to the

Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for

information and needful. The reference is accordingly

disposed of.

JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4187

ubZ fnYyh] 10 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1601-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ lh

,y ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k

92@2005) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks

10&07&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y&22012@335@2004&vkbZ vkj (lh ,e&2)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 10th July, 2013

S.O. 1601.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 92/

2005) of the Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial

dispute between the management of M/s. Eastern

Coalfields Limited, and their workmen, received by the

Central Government on 10-07-2013.

[ No. L- 22012/335/2004-IR (CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL

TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL

PRESENT :

SRI JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer.

Reference No. 92 of 2005

PARTIES :

The management of Kuardih Colliery of M/s. ECL,

Burdwan.

Vs.

The Org. Secy., CRMS, Bidhanbag, Burdwan (W.B.)

REPRESENTATIVES :

For the Management

: None.

For the Union (Workman)

: None.

Industry : Coal

State : West Bengal

Dated 28-05-2013

AWARD

In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-

section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), Govt. of India

through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No.

L-22012/335/2004-IR (CM-II) dated 4-8-2005 has been

pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by

this Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of ECL in

denying employment in respect of Shri Gurucharan

Prasad Koiri, dependant son of Late Kashi Prasad

Koiri of Kuardih Colliery is legal and justified ? If not,

to what relief Shri Gurucharan Prasad Koiri is

entitled ?”

Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/

335/2004-IR (CM-II) dated 4-8-2005 of the above said

reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour,

New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference case

No. 92 of 2005 was registered on 17-8-2005 and accordingly

an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through

the registered post to the parties concerned directing them

to appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their

written statements along with the relevant documents

and a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In

pursuance of the said order notices by the registered post

were sent to the parties concerned.

On perusal of the case record, it has found that the

workman is neither appearing nor taking any step since

5-3-2012. Several opportunities were given but of no effect.

It seems that the workman is now not interested to proceed

with the case any further. Since the workman is not

interested to proceed with the case, the case is closed and

accordingly an order of “ No Dispute” award is hereby

passed.

ORDER

Let an “Award” be and the same is passed as “No

Dispute” existing. Send the copies of the order to the Govt.

of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for needful

information. The reference is accordingly disposed of.

JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 10 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1602-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ lh

,y ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k

71@2006) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks

10&07&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y&22012@296@2005&vkbZ vkj (lh ,e&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

4188

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 10th July, 2013

S.O. 1602.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 71/

2006) of the Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial

dispute between the management of Bankola Area of

M/s. Eastern Coalfileds Limited, and their workmen,

received by the Central Government on 10-07-2013.

[No. L- 22012/296/2005-IR (CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL

TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL

PRESENT :

SRI JYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer.

Reference No. 71 of 2006

PARTIES :

The management of Kunardihi B. Colliery of M/s.

ECL, Burdwan.

Vs.

The Org. Secy., CRMS (BMM), Burdwan (W.B.)

REPRESENTATIVES :

For the Management

: Shri P. K. Goswami,

Ld. Advocate.

For the Union (Workman)

: Shri

M.

K.

Bandopadhaya, Ld.

Representative.

Industry : Coal

State : West Bengal

Dated 20-05-2013

AWARD

In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-

section (1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), Govt. of India

through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No.

L-22012/296/2005-IR (CM-II) dated 6-10-2006 has been

pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by

this Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of Kumardihi

‘B’ Colliery under Bankola Area of M/s. Eastern

Coalfilds Limited in denying employment to the

dependant of Late Basu Bhuiya, Underground

Loader is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief

the depandent of the deceased workman is

entitled ?”

Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012296/

2005-IR (CM-II) dated 6-10-2006 of the above said reference

from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for

adjudication of the dispute, a reference case No. 71 of

2006 was registered on 31-10-2006 and accordingly an order

to that effect was passed to issue notices through the

registered post to the parties concerned directing them to

appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their written

statements along with the relevant documents and a list

of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance of

the said or er notices by the registered post were sent to

the parties concerned.

From perusal of the written statement of the

Management dated 16-1-2002 (Para 2) I find that it is an

admitted fact that Basu Bhuiya (deceased) was an

employee of Kumardihi ‘‘B’’ Colliery having U.M. No.

616592 has been suffering from incurable disease and he

got admitted at Central hospital Kalla on 2-3-1998 for

treatment but he could not survive and died on 15-3-1998.

Photocopy of Medical treatment as well as Death

Certificate granted by Central Hospital Kalla, Asansol and

ECL are filed on behalf of the claimant (dependant). Further

from the photocopy of the order of Chief General Manager,

Bankola Area under ECL dated 23-8-1997 Ref. No. BA/PD/

Dis/98/906, it is apparently clear that the Management has

dismissed the deceased Basu Bhuiya on 17-3-1998 that is

after his death. Further I find that the Management to

save their skin put the date ‘‘13’’ befre ‘‘17’’ to avoid any

claim of the dependant deceased which, any my opinion,

is not fair and against the ‘‘Natural Justice’’. In my opinion

Jago Bhuiya the son of the Late Basu Bhuiya has every

right to claim for job on compassionate ground due to

death of his father Basu Bhuiya.

Accordingly in my opinion the action of the

Managemen of Kumardihi ‘B’ Colliery under Bankola Area

of M/s. ECL in denying employment to Jago Bhuiya the

dependant of Late Basu Bhuiya is illegal and unjustified,

and accordingly the same is set aside. The Management

is directed to give employment to Jago Bhuiya dependant

of Late Basu Bhuiya within two months from the date of

receipt of the Award.

ORDER

Let an “Award” be and the same is passed as per

above discussion. Send the copies of the order to the Govt.

of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for information and

needful. The reference is accordingly disposed of.

JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 10 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1603-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ lh

,y ds çca/ra=k ds laca¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4189

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k

29@2002) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks

10&07&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹iQk- la- ,y&22012@339@2001&vkbZ vkj (lh ,e&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 10th July, 2013

S.O. 1603.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 29/2002)

of the Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,

Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial

dispute between the management of Bejdih Colliery, M/s.

Eastern Coalfields Limited, and their workmen, received

by the Central Government on 10-07-2013.

[ F. No. L- 22012/339/2001-IR (CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL

TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL

PRESENT :

Sri Jyanta Kumar Sen, Presiding Officer.

Reference No. 29 of 2002

PARTIES :

The management of Bejdih Colliery of. M/s. ECL,

Burdwan.

Vs.

Shri Jawahar Singh, Vice President, CMU (INTUC),

Asansol (WB).

REPRESENTATIVES :

For the Management

: Shri P. K. Goswami,

Ld. Advocate.

For the Union (Workman)

: None

Industry : COAL

State : West Bengal

Dated 14-05-2013

AWARD

In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-

section (1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), Govt. of India

through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No.

L-22012/339/2001-IR (CM-II) dated 14-8-2002 has been

pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by

this Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of Bejdih

Colliery under Sodapur Area of M/s. EC Ltd. in

dismissing Shri Sadhu Paswan, U.G. Loader from

service w.e.f. 1-6-1996 is justified ? If not

to what relief is the workman entitled ?”

Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/

339/2001-IR (CM-II) dated 14-08-2002 of the above said

reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour,

New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference case

No. 29 of 2002 was registered on 10-9-2002 and accordingly

an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through

the registered post to the parties concerned directing them

to appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their

written statements along with the relevant documents

and a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In

pursuance of the said order notices by the registered post

were sent to the parties concerned.

On perusal of the case record, it has found that the

workman is neither appearing nor taking any step since

2007. It seems that the workman is now not interested to

proceed with the case any further. Several opportunities

were given but of no effect. Since the workman is not

interested to proceed with the case, the case is closed and

accordingly an order of “ No Dispute” award is hereby

passed.

ORDER

Let an “Award” be and the same is passed as “No

Dispute” existing. Send the copies of the order to the Govt.

of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for needful

information. The reference is accordingly disposed of.

JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 10 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1604-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ lh

,y ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k

17@2012) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks

10&07&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹iQk- la- ,y&22012@30@2012&vkbZ vkj (lh ,e&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 10th July, 2013

S.O. 1604.—In pursuanceof Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 17/2012)

of the Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,

4190

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial

dispute between the management of M/s. J. K. Nagar

Colliery, M/s. E.C. Ltd., and their workmen, received by

the Central Government on 10-07-2013.

[ F. No. L- 22012/30/2012-IR (CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL

TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL

PRESENT :

Sri Jyanta Kumar Sen, Presiding Officer.

Reference No. 17 of 2012

PARTIES :

The management of J. K. Nagar Colliery, Satgram

Area of M/s. ECL, Burdwan.

Vs.

Sri D. K. Routh, Branch Jt. Secy., CMC (HMS),

Anansol, Burdwan (W.B.)

REPRESENTATIVES :

For the Management

: P. K. Goswami, Ld.

Advocate.

For the Union (Workman)

: None

Industry : COAL

State : West Bengal

Dated 25-4-2013

AWARD

In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-

section (1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), Govt. of India

through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No.

L-22012/30/2012-IR (CM-II) dated 19-4-2012 has been

pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by

this Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of J. K.

Nagar Colliery of M/s. ECL in not payment HRA @

10% of Basic Pay to Sri Samsuddin Mia is fair and

Justifed ? To what relief the concerned workman is

is entitled to ?”

Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/30/

2012-IR (CM-II) dated 19-4-2012 of the above said reference

from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour,

New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference case

No. 17 of 2012 was registered on 8-5-2012 and accordingly

an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through

the registered post to the parties concerned directing them

to appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their

written statements along with the relevant documents

and a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In

pursuance of the said order notices by the registered post

were sent to the parties concerned.

On perusal of the case record, it has found that Sri

D. K. Routh, Branch Jt. Secretary of the Union, submits

that the workman is not interested to proceed with the

case and further prayed for the closure of the case. Since

the workman is not interested to proceed with the case,

the case is closed and accordingly an order of “ No

Dispute” award is hereby passed.

ORDER

Let an “Award” be and the same is passed as “No

Dispute” existing. Send the copies of the order to the Govt.

of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for needful

information. The reference is accordingly disposed of.

JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 10 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1605-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ lh

,y ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k

18@2012) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks

10&07&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹iQk- la- ,y&22012@25@2012&vkbZ vkj (lh ,e&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 10th July, 2013

S.O. 1605.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 18/2012)

of the Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,

Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial

dispute between the management of M/s. J. K. Nagar

Colliery, M/s. E.C. Ltd., and their workmen, received by

the Central Government on 10-07-2013.

[ F. No. L- 22012/25/2012-IR (CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL

TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL

PRESENT :

Sri Jyanta Kumar Sen, Presiding Officer.

Reference No. 18 of 2012

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4191

PARTIES :

The management of J. K. Nagar Colliery, Satgram

Area of M/s. ECL, Burdwan.

Vs.

Sri D. K. Routh, Branch Jt. Secy., CMC (HMS),

Anansol, Burdwan (W.B.)

REPRESENTATIVES :

For the Management

: Sri P. K. Goswami,

Ld. Advocate.

For the Union (Workman)

: None

Industry : Coal

State : West Bengal

Dated 25-4-2013

AWARD

In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-

section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), Govt. of India

through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No.

L-22012/25/2012-IR (CM-II) dated 19-4-2012 has been

pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by

this Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of J. K.

Nagar Colliery of M/s. ECL in not payment HRA @

10% of Basic Pay to Sri Sheopujan Thakur is while

he was working at the J. K. Nagar Colliery, Raniganj

is fair and justified ? To what relief the concerned

workman is entitled to ?”

Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/25/

2012-IR (CM-II) dated 19-4-2012 of the above said reference

from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour,

New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference case

No. 18 of 2012 was registered on 8-5-2012 and accordingly

an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through

the registered post to the parties concerned directing them

to appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their

written statements along with the relevant documents

and a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In

pursuance of the said order notices by the registered post

were sent to the parties concerned.

On perusal of the case record, it has been found that

Sri D. K. Routh, Branch Jt. Secretary of the Union, submits

that the workman is not interested to proceed with the

case and further prayed for the closure of the case. Since

the workman is not interested to proceed with the case,

the case is closed and accordingly an order of “No

Dispute” award is hereby passed.

ORDER

Let an “Award” be and the same is passed as “No

Dispute” existing. Send the copies of the order to the Govt.

of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for needful

information. The reference is accordingly disposed of.

JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 10 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1606-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ lh

,y ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k

27@2009) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks

10&07&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y&22012@44@2009&vkbZ vkj (lh ,e&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 10th July, 2013

S.O. 1606.—In exercise of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 27/

2009 of the Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Anansol as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial

dispute between the management of Pandaveshwar Area

of M/s. EC L, and their workmen, received by the Central

Government on 10-07-2013.

[ No. L- 22012/44/2009-IR (CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL

TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL

PRESENT :

SRI JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer.

Reference No. 27 of 2009

PARTIES :

The management of Pandaveshwar Area of

M/s. ECL, Burdwan.

Vs.

The General Secy., UCMU, Khandra, Burdwan

(W.B.)

4192

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

REPRESENTATIVES :

For the Management

: Sri P. K. Goswami,

Ld. Advocate.

For the Union (Workman)

: G. P. Mal, Ld.

Advocate.

Industry : Coal

State : West Bengal

Dated 7-5-2013

AWARD

In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-

section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), Govt. of India

through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No.

L-22012/44/2009-IR (CM-II) dated 10-11-2009 has been

pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by

this Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of

M/s. ECL, in not providing employment to Shri

Kuntial Mukherjee, the dependant son of the

deceased workman Shri Bimalendu Mukherjee is

legal and justifed ? To what relief is the claimant

entitled for ?’’

Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/44/

2009-IR (CM-II) dated 10-11-2009 of the above said

reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour,

New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference case

No. 27 of 2009 was registered on 30-11-2009 and

accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue

notices through the registered post to the parties

concerned directing them to appear in the court on the

date fixed and to file their written statements along with

the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support

of their claims. In pursuance of the said order notices by

the registered post were sent to the parties concerned.

On perusal of the case record, it has found that Sri G.

P. Mal, Ld. Advocate for the workman, files an affidavit of

Smt. Mina Rani Mukherjee, member of Sri Kuntial

Mukherjee praying for dismissing the case. Since the

workman wants to withdraw the case, the case is closed

and accordingly an order of “ No Dispute” award is hereby

passed.

ORDER

Let an “Award” be and the same is passed as “No

Dispute” existing. Send the copies of the order to the Govt.

of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for needful

information. The reference is accordingly disposed of.

JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 10 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1607-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ ,iQ lh

vkbZ ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- 2] p.Mhx<+ ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k

87@2005) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks

10&07&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y&22012@158@2004&vkbZ vkj (lh ,e&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 10th July, 2013

S.O. 1607.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 87/

2005) of the Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court No. 2, Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure, in the

industrial dispute between the management of Food

Corporation of India, and their workmen, received by the

Central Government on 10-07-2013.

[No. L- 22012/158/2004-IR (CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNNEXURE

IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL

IRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT-II, CHANDIGARH

PRESENT :

SRI A. K. RASTOGI, Presiding Officer.

Case No. I.D. No. 87/2005

Registered on 19-4-2005

Sh. Mangej Singh, S/o Sh. Manga Ram, Gali No. 9,

Samad Road, Near Govt. Primary School, Sunam.

. . . Petitioner

Versus

Sr. Regional Manager, Food Corporation of India,

Sector 34-A, Chandigarh.

. . . Respondents

APPEARANCES :

For the workman

:

Sh. Sarabjit A. R.

For the Management

:

Sh. Santokh Singh,

Advocate.

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4193

AWARD

Passed on 11-4-2013

Central, Government vide Notification No. L-22012/

158/2004-IR (CM-II) dated 30-3-2005, by exercising its

powers under Section 10 Sub-section (1) Clause (d) and

Sub-section (2-A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

(hereinafter referred to as ‘Act’) has referred the following

Industrial dispute for adjudication to the Tribunal :—

“Whether the action of the management of Food

Corporation of India, Chandigarh in terminating the

services of Sh. Mangej , Singh, Watchman/Chowkidar

is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman

is entitled ?’’

‘

According to the claim statement the workman had

worked with FCI as Chowkidar from 15-5-1979 to 31-3-1980

continuously. But his services were terminated on 1-4-1980

without any notice, inquiry, charge-sheet or compensation.

It has also been alleged that ,the juniors of the workman

are still in service and new hands had been employed after

his termination. He claimed his reinstatement with

continuity of service and back wages.

Claim was contested by the management., It was

denied that the workman ever worked in FCI and he was

the appointee of the management. And since he was not an

employee of the management hence, ,the question of

termination of his service by the management does not

arise and nor does arise the question of retaining the juniors

or employing fresh hands. According to the management

the claim is frivolous and deserves to be dismissed.

In evidence the workman fiied his affidavit and gave

his statement. He also filed photocopies of two documents

marked ‘A’ and ‘B’. While on behalf of the management

affidavit was filed by Mahender Singh, Area Manager who

gave his statement also.

It may be mentioned that on the application of the

workman for summoning the record he had been directed

to assist the management in locating the record vide order

dated 14-3-2006. Consequently he had searched for the

record in presence of the official of the management but

the record could not be traced out and the workman certified

this fact under his hand. The fact is mentioned in order

dated 2-5-2006. The workman however had been given the

liberty to prove his case by any other mode including

secondary evidence. Consequently he filed photocopies

marked as ‘A’ and ‘B’.

None appeared for workman for arguing, the. case

despite several opportunities given to him for the purpose.

I therefore heard the learned counsel for the management

and perused the eyidence on record.

The photocopy Mark ‘A’ filed by the workman

purports to be a letter written by Assistant District Manager

Sangrur verifying. the attendance of workers. In this letter

workman has been shown to have worked for 108 days in

the year 1979 to 1980. Mark ‘B’ is a list regarding Bonus in

which the name of the workman appears at serial No.19.

The management suggested to the workman during his

cross-examination that they are forged documents. The

management-witness could not comment on these

documents in the absence of originals. The workman has

not stated from where and how he got the photocopies. He

did not produce the person. who had supplied the copies.

The genuineness of ‘A’ and ‘B’ therefore cannot be

accepted.

The learned counsel for the management argued that

it is clear from the statement of the workman that he neither

possessed the appointment letter no rtermination order.

As per his statement he had not been issued any salary

slip also and there is nothing in his evidence to show that

he had been appointed by the management or he was in

the employment of the management.

It may be noted that even if the document Mark ‘A’

relied on by the workman are believed then he only worked

for 108 days during 1979-1980 the alleged period of his

employment. Therefore in no way he is entitled to the

protection of Section 25F of the Act.

The workman has further failed to prove that while

terminating his services persons junior to him were retained

or any new hand was employed by the management after

his termination.

Thus there is no reliable evidence to prove that the

workman was in the employment of the management and.

his services were terminated by the management. However

even if the document Mark ‘A’ relied on by him is

considered no case of protection of Section 25F is made

out. Violation of Section 25G and 25H of the Act also is not

proved. It is therefore held that the workman was not in the

employment and his services were not’terminated by the

management and secondly even if for arguments sake his

employment with the management and termination of his

services is accepted then there is no illegality in the alleged

termination. Workman is not entitled to any relief. Reference

,is decided against the workman. Let two copies of the

award be sent to the Central Government for further

necessary action.

ASHOK KUMAR RASTOGI, Presiding Officer

4194

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ubZ fnYyh] 10 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1608-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ ,p ,e

Vh ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] cSaxyksj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 38@2002)

dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 10&7&2013 dks çkIr

gqvk Fkk A

¹iQk- la- ,y&42012@183@2001&vkbZ vkj (lh,e&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 10th July, 2013

S.O. 1608.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Diputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 38/2002)

of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Bangalore as shown in the Annexure, in the

Industrial dispute between the management of Hindustan

Machine Tools Limited and their workmen received by the

Central Government on 10-7-2013.

[F. No. L- 42012/183/2001-IR(CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT,

BANGALORE

Dated : 4th April, 2013

Present : Shri S. N. NA V ALGUND, Presiding Officer

C. R. No. 38/2002

I Party

Sh. S. Kumar,

P P No. 1224, BSA Road,

Periyarnagar,

Bangalore - 560005.

II Party

1. The Chairman and Managing Director,

HMT Limited, HMT Bhavan,

No. 59, Bellary Road.

Bangalore - 560032.

2. M/s. B. M. Enterprises, No. 22.

Vijayanagar Colony, Behind Tin

Factory, Dooravaninagar.

Bangalore - 560 014.

Appearances

I Party

: Sh. K. V. Sathyesh Simha, Advocate

II Party

: Sh. M. M. Cariappa

Advocate for II Party No. 1

Sh. Prakash Rao K.

Advocate for II Party No. 2

AWARD

1.The Central Government by exercising the powers

conferred by Clause (d) of Sub-section (1) of Sub-section

2A of the Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

has referred this dispute vide Order No. L-42012/183/2001-

IR(CM-II) dated 16.07.2002 for adjudication on the

following schedule:

SCHEDULE

‘‘Whether Sh. S. Kumar, former contract workman

under M/s. B.M. Enterprises is justified in claiming

regular alternative employment under the

Management of M/s. HMT Limited in view of his

amputation of the arm due to accident while on duty?

If so, to what relief he is entitled to?’’

2. On receipt of the reference to registering it in

C R 38/2002, when the notices were issued to I Party and II

Party No.1 and 2 all entered their appearances through

their respective advocates and the I party filed his claim

statement on 13-09-2002 and II party No.1 filed its counter

statement on 06-1-2003, whereas II Party No. 2 did not file

counter statement.

3. The I party in his claim state contended that II

Party No. 1 is a Public Sector Undertaking having its Units

all over India carrying different types of manufacturing

activities with its Head Office at Bangalore and that he

has been working as a Helper in its Printing Centre at

Bangalore since 1984 assisting in the work of Printing/

Binding, cutting which are perennial in nature but the II

Party No.1 to shirk its responsibility of providing privileges

and other monetary benefits as per law shown him to be

working under different contractors namely M/s. Kapila

Enterprises from 1984 to 1989, M/s. J P Enterprises from

1989 to 1994 and M/s. B M Enterprises from 1994 to 1999

and the said system being sham cooked up for exploiting

the work force and that he is the employee of the II Party

No. 1/HMT Limited itself. It is further alleged that while he

was working in the Printing Press on 13-8-1997 and was

adjusting the Letter Heads on the cutting machine, the

cutting blade of the machine suddenly came down on his

left wrist and chopped it off and it was due to the fault in

cutting machine and that portion came to be amputed and

his hospitalization and medical expenses were borne by

the II Party No.1 and after his recovery he was taken in

service but from 02-4-1999 abruptly terminated his services

without giving any notice of whatsoever and another

workman has been replaced and he who belongs to Adi

Dravida Community/ Schedule Caste being the only bread

winner of the family comprising of Wife, Children and his

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4195

aged Mother being unable to get any alternative

employment the II Party No.1 be directed to reinstate him

into service. He also stated in Para 7 of the claim statement

that while referring the dispute the government erroneously

referred him as contract workman and that he is in fact the

workman under II Party No.1. Interalia, the II Party No.1 in

its Counter Statement while contending that Sh.S. Kumar/

l Party workman was in the employment of the Contractor

M/s. B M Enterprises and met with an accident due to his

negligence and not by fault in cutting machine and on

Humanitarian ground he was immediately taken to

M/s. Ramaiah Hospital, one of the best hospital in

Bangalore where the Doctors conducted operation and

amputed the wrist of the I party due to gangrene and

though he was covered under ESI special treatment was

provided to him spending Rs. 20,000.00 and besides the

best Medical Treatment an amount of Rs. 50,000 was

collected as donation from HMT Employees and was

deposited in the name of the I Party as fixed deposit to

enable him to collect the interest. Thus, it is contended as

there exist no relationship of Employer and Employee

between II party and I Party there is no Industrial Dispute

between them. It is further contended the contract was

given to M/s. B M Enterprises/II Party No.2 to run its

printing centre for a period of one year from 01-4-1998 to

31-3-1999 and under that contractor I Party was working

as contract employee and on lapse of the contract period

it was terminated by giving one months' notice period as

per the contract agreement vide their Letter No.

GMM(IMG)/PDC/46/98-99 dated 01-3-1999 since there was

no requirement of the said job. It is also further contended

as II Party No.1 is passing through a very critical situation

and is in the process of downsizing the man power to

make the company viable they are not in a position to

provide employment to the I Party.

4. With the above pleadings when the matter came

to be posted for evidence, the learned advocate appearing

for the I party while filing the affidavit of I party reiterating

the claim statement examining him on oath as WW 1 got

exhibited 16 documents Ex W-1 to Ex W-16 the detailed

description of which are narrated in the annexure and also

by filing an affidavit of one V Chandrashekar, Retired

Employee of the HMT examined him on oath as WW 2.

Interalia, the learned advocate appearing for II party No.1

while filing the affidavits of N Jayavelu, Manager, CRB

Division, HMT Machine Tools Limited, Bangalore and V

Mohan, Clerk-cum-Typist examined them as MW 1 and

MW 2 respectively and in the evidence of MW2 got

exhibited six documents as Ex M-1 to Ex M-6 the detailed

description of which are narrated in the annexure.

5. After close of the evidence of both sides when

the matter was posted for arguments, the learned advocate

appearing for the I party urged that I party workman was

not a contract worker at all and he worked in the Printing

Centre run by the II party No.1 for about 20 years and

during discharge of his work his left hand caught in the

cutting machine and came to be amputed as such he is

entitle to continue in service till he attained the age of

superannuation. Interalia, the learned advocate appearing

for the II party No.1 urged that there being no IOTA of

evidence to demonstrate that I party was engaged directly

by the II party No.1 and on the other hand his own

documentary evidence suggest that he was working

through different contract agencies and even as per the

schedule of the reference as well he being described as

contract workman under M/s. B M Enterprises further

asking to adjudicate whether he is justified in claiming

regular alternative employment under M/s. HMT Limited/

II Party No.1 in view of the amputation of arm while on

duty, there is no scope to consider that he is the actual

employee of II party No. 1 and his entitlement of continuing

in service till attaining the age of superannuation.

6. At the outset, I may say without any hesitation

since the schedule for adjudication is as to Whether Sh. S

Kumar former contract workman under M/s. B M

Enterprises is justified in claiming regular alternative

employment under the management of M/s. HMT Limited

in view of the amputation of the arm due to accident while

on duty, the attempt made by the I party through his claim

statement, evidence and the arguments to treat him as the

actual employee engaged by the II party No.1 and to direct

the II party No, 1 to continue his service till he attain the

age of superannuation is a futile attempt being outside the

perview of the reference. Since the reference is whether

the I party workman under M/s, B M Enterprises is justified

in claiming alternative employment under II party No.1

due to loss of arm in accident while on duty, there being

no dispute he having suffered amputation of the left wrist

while on duty in the printing centre belonging the II Party

No. 1 it was for the I party to justify the claim of regular

alternative employment under the II Party No.1, but instead

of making any effort in that regard as already adverted to

by me above he tried to make out a case that he is actually

under the employment of II Party No.1 and he has been

arbitrarily terminated and he be allowed to continue in

service till attaining the age of superannuation which is

altogether outside the scope of this reference. The I party

neither in his claim statement, nor in his evidence brought

on record to convince me or to justify that he is entitled

for regular alternative employment under II Party No.1.

Even his learned advocate failed to bring to my notice any

provision under such circumstance the Principle Employer

is required to provide employment to contractor workman.

If at all the I Party was not satisfied with the schedule of

the reference referring him as contract workman under

M/s. B M Enterprises and his claim is for regular alternative

employment under the management of M/s. HMT Limited

in view of the amputation of his arm in the accident, he

ought to have made a representation to the Ministry/

Referring authority to correct the schedule of the reference

4196

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

by way of corrigendum as expected by him. In the absence

of the I party getting any modification or corrigendum to

the schedule of the reference there is no scope in this

reference to consider him as the actual workman of II party

No.1 and to give him a relief of continuing in service till he

attains the age of superannuation as claimed by him. Under

the circumstances, I arrive at conclusion the I party who

was former contract workman under M/s. B M Enterprises

failed to justify his claim of Regular Alternative Employment

under the management of M/s. HMT Limited/II party No.1

and that he is not entitle for any relief. In the result, I pass

the following Order:

ORDER

The reference is rejected holding that Sh. S Kumar, former

contract workman under M/s. B M Enterprises failed to

justify his claim of Regular Alternative Employment under

the management of M/s. HMT Limted in view of the

amputation of the arm due to accident while on duty and

that he is not entitle for any relief.

(Dictated to UDC, transcribed by him, corrected and signed

by me on 4th April 2013)

S. N. NAVALGUND, Presiding Officer

ANNEXURE - I

Witness examined on behalf of I Party

WW1- Sh. S Kumar, I Party Workman

WW2 - Sh. V Chandrashekar, Retired HMT Employee

Documents exhibited by I Party :

Ex. W-1-

Identity Card issued to I Party by contractor

M/s. Kapilan Enterprises

Ex. W - 2-

2 ESI Cards issued by Contractor M/s. David

Business Services dated 1-5-1992

Ex. W - 3 -

PF Slip for 1995-96 vide A/c No. KN/15471/31

issued by M/s. David Business Services

Ex. W -4 -

Certificate issued by the contractor

M/s. David Business Services dated 30-09-99

certifying I Party workman having worked

with them as Helper under Contract at various

office from 1990 to 1995.

Ex. W - 5-

Application of the 1 Party under the pension

scheme of PFO, countersigned by M/s. David

Business Services dated 2-7-1998

Ex. W-6 -

Certificate issued by M/s. B M Enterprises

dated 25-09-2000 certifying I party having

worked under them as Helper in HMT Printing

Centre from 01-06-1995 to 31-03-1999

Ex. W-7 -

Copy of claim form under ESI signed and

submitted by M/s. B M Enterprises for

accident dated 14-8-1997

Ex.W-8 -

Reply of Second Party No. I dated 25-01-1999

to I Party to his representation dated

24-08-1998

Ex. W-9 -

Reply of Second Party No. I dated 07-06-2000

to I Party to his representation dated

19-02-2000

Ex. W-10-

Reply of Second Party No.1 dated 23.01.2001

to ALC Notice dated 08-01-2001

Ex. W-11-

Copy of the petition U/s 10(1)(C) of ID Act

filed before Chief Labour Commissioner

Ex.W-12-

Notice dated 29-12-2000 issued by Assistant

Labour Commissioner to Second Parties

Ex. W-13 -

Reply to the Notice. issued by HMT Ltd.,

dated 14-05-2001 to Assistant Labour

Commissioner

Ex. W-14-

Report of Conciliation passed by Regional

Labour Commissioner, Bangalore

Ex. W-15-

Book on Dr. S M Patil Biography

Ex. W-16-

Literature including some stationery, calendar

Series

etc., printed at Printing Section

Witness examined on behalf of II Party

MW1-

Sh. N Jayavelu, Manager. CRB Division, HMT

Machine Tools Limited, Bangalore

MW2

Sh. V Mohan, Deputy Manager (Admn).

Documents Exhibited for II Party :

Ex. M-1

Copy of Delivery Voucher No. MAN

(ADM)MTBO 1/05-06 dated 21-03-2006

Ex. M - 2

Copy of Delivery Voucher No. MAN

(ADM)MTB/02/05-06 dated 21-03-2006

Ex. M - 3

Copy of Delivery Voucher No. MAN

(ADM)MTB/03/05-06 dated 21-03-2006

Ex. M - 4

Copy of Letter No. MHTl/V/Printing/Sales

dated April 6, 2006 of HMT Machine Tools

Limited. Kalamassery addressed to HMT

Machine Tools Limited, Bangalore.

Ex. M - 5

Letter of Authorisation dated 15-7-2010.

Ex. M - 6

Copy of letter addressed by II Party No. 1 to

II party No. 2 dated 01.03.1999

ubZ fnYyh] 10 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1609-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkbZ-lh-vkbZ-

lh-vkbZ- cSad fy- ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds

deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh;

ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] t;iqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ

la[;k 122@2005) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks

20&6&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹iQk- la- ,y&12012@36@2005&vkbZ vkj (ch&I)º

lqefr ldykuh] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4197

New Delhi, the 10th July, 2013

S.O. 1609.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Diputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 122/

2005) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Jaipur as shown in the Annexure, in the

Industrial dispute between the management of ICICI Bank

Ltd. and their workman, received by the Central

Government on 20-6-2013.

[No. L- 12012/36/2005-IR(B-I)]

SUMATI SAKLANI, Section Officer

vuqca/

dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;]

t;iqj

lh-th-vkbZ-Vh- izdj.k la- 122@2005

Jh ,u- ds- iqjksfgr] ihBklhu vf/dkjh

jsiQjsUl ua-&,y&12012@36@2005&IR(B-I) fnukad 21&10&2005

Sh. Harsukh Lal Kuhmar, S/o Dhukanlal Kuhmar

21/454, Chopsani Housing Board,

Jodhpur (Rajasthan)

v/s

1. Chieg Executive Officer, I.C.I.C.I. Bank Limited,

I.C.I.C.I. Bank Towers Bandra Kurla Complex,

Mumbai-400051

2. The General Manager (Operation), I.C.I.C.I. Bank

Limited, C-3, Sardar Patel Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur.

3. A.G. M.,I.C.I.C.I. Bank Limited, Jal Jog Circle

Residency Road, Jodhpur.

4. Manager, I.C.I.C.I. Bank Limited, Gandhi Chauk,

Barmer. (After merger I.C.I.C.I. Bank has been

Substituded in place of the Bank of Raj. Ltd., Jaipur)

izkFkhZ dh rjiQ ls % Jh lqjs'k d';i

vizkFkhZ dh rjiQ ls % Jh vkykSd iQrsgiqfj;k

% iapkV %

fnukad % 10&4&2013

1- dsUnzh; ljdkj ds }kjk fuEu fookn vkS|ksfxd fookn

vf/fu;e] 1947 dh /kjk 10 dh mi/kjk ds [k.M (?k) ds

izko/kuksa ds vUrxZr mDr vkns'k ds }kjk U;k;fu.kZ;u gsrq izsf"kr

fd;k x;k Fkk A

D;k egkizca/d (vkijs'ku) vihysV izkf/dkjh nh cSad

vkiQ jktLFkku fy-] dsUnzh; dk;kZy; t;iqj ds }kjk vius deZdkj

Jh gjlq[kyky dqEgkj iq=k Jh /qdu yky dqEgkj DydZ&de&

dSf'k;j&de xkSnke dhij dks vkns'k fnukad 6&4&2004 ds rgr

lsok ls fMLpktZ djuk U;k;ksfpr ,oa fof/ lEer gS \ ;fn ugha rks

deZdkj vius fu;kstd ls fdl jkgr dks ikus dk

vf/dkjh gS\

2- laf{kIr esa rF; bl izdkj gS fd izkFkhZ gjlq[kyky DydZ&

de&dSf'k;j dks vizkFkhZ cSad vkWiQ jktLFkku ds ckM+esj czkUp esa

dk;Zjr jgrs gq, fnukad 19&4&1996 dks vkjksi&i=k fn;k x;k

ftldk tokc mlds }kjk fnukad 2&5&1996 dks izLrqr fd;k x;k A

ftlls lUrq"V u gksus ij cSad izca/u us fnukad 7&2&1997 ds

vkns'k }kjk Jh uUn fd'kksj f=kikBh dks tkap vf/dkjh fu;qDr

fd;k A ckn esa fnukad 14&3&2001 dks Jh nsohflag jktiqjksfgr dks

tkap vf/dkjh cuk;k x;k ftUgksaus ekeys esa tkap dk;Zokgh lEikfnr

dj viuh tkap fjiksVZ vuq'kklukRed izkf/dkjh dks fnukad

26&10&2002 izLrqr dh ftlesa izkFkhZ ds fo#¼ yxk;s x;s dqy nl

vkjksiksa esa ls vkjksi la- 1 ls 5 o 8 dks izekf.kr ik;k rFkk vkjksi

la[;k 6] 7] 9] o 10 dks vizekf.kr ik;k A bl izdkj tkap

vfèkdkjh us izkFkhZ dks f}i{kh; le>kSrk ds iSjk la[;k 19&5&C, E,

G, J rFkk iSjk la[;k 19&7] J, K esa of.kZr ?kksj vopkj o y?kq

vopkj dk nks"kh ik;k A

3- tkap vf/dkjh ds mDr fu"d"kZ ds vk/kj ij vuq'kklfud

izkf/dkjh us vkns'k fnukad 25&11&2003 }kjk izkFkhZ ij vfoyEc

fcuk lwpuk ds cSad dh lsok ls c[kkZLr djus dk n.M vkjksfir

fd;k A vkns'k ds fo#¼ foHkkxh; vihyh; izkf/dkjh ds le{k

izLrqr vihy esa vuq'kklfud izkf/dkjh }kjk izkFkhZ ij vkjksfir

n.M dks la'kksf/r djrs gq, izkFkhZ dks lsok ifjykHkksa dks nsrs gq, lsok

ls gVk;s tkus ds n.M ls nf.Mr fd;k A

4- izkFkh }kjk le>kSrk vf/dkjh ds le{k izLrqr fookn esa

okrkZ foiQy jgus ij mDr fookn dks fnukad 21&10&2005 dks

dsUnzh; ljdkj }kjk U;k;fu.kZ;u gsrq funsZ'k (Reference) fd;k

x;k A

5- izkFkhZ us Dyse LVsVesUV esa vfHkdfFkr fd;k gS fd mls

vius cpko gsrq i;kZIr ekSdk ugha fn;k] vko';d nLrkost miyC/

ugha djk;s ,oa lk{khx.k ls izfrijh{kk dk i;kZIr volj ugha fn;k

blfy, tkap uSlfxZd U;k; ds fl¼karksa dh vogsyuk ds dkj.k

Ítq ugha Fkh A izkFkhZ us ;g Hkh vfHkdfFkr fd;k gS fd tkap

vf/dkjh us ftu vkjksiksa dks fl¼ ik;k gS] muds lEcU/ esa tkap

vf/dkjh ds fu"d"kZ =kqfViw.kZ (pervese) gS] D;ksfd tkap ds nkSjku

vfHkys[k ij vkbZ ekSf[kd o izys[kh; lk{; ls izkFkhZ ds fo#¼ dksbZ

vkjksi ugha curk A

6- izkFkhZ ds ;g Hkh vfHkdfFkr fd;k gS fd mlds }kjk izLrqr

fyf[kr cgl ij fopkj fd;s fcuk gh vihyh; izkf/dkjh us tkap

vf/dkjh o vuq'kklfud izkf/dkjh ds fu"d"kZ ls lgefr trkrs

gq, vuq'kklfud izkf/dkjh }kjk izkFkhZ ij vkjksfir n.M dks

la'kksf/r djrs gq, lsok ifjykHkksa dks nsrs gq, lsok ls gVk;s tkus ds

n.M ls nf.Mr fd;k gS A izkFkhZ ds fo#¼ tks vkjksi yxs gSa os y?kq

izd`fr ds gS ftlds fy, lsok eqfDr tSlk dBksj n.M ugha fn;k tk

ldrkA

7- izkFkhZ us izkFkZuk dh gS fd fookfnr vkns'k }kjk izkFkhZ dks

lsok eqDr fd;s tkus ds vizkFkhZ ds d`R; dks vuqfpr ,oa voS/

4198

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

?kksf"kr fd;k tkos rFkk mls iwjs osru o fgr ykHkksa ds lkFk lsok esa

cgky fd;k tkos A

8- tokc esa vizkFkhZ ds izkDdFku gS fd tkap vf/dkjh us

tkap uSlfxZd U;k; ds fl¼kUrksa dh ikyuk djrs gq, ,oa vkjksfir

i{k dks mlds cpko dk leqfpr volj fn;k tkdj lEikfnr dh

gS] tks mfpr ,oa oS/ gS A tkap vf/dkjh us tkap i=kkoyh ij vk,

lHkh rF;ksa ij fopkj djus ds i'pkr~ viuk fu"d"kZ fudkyk gS o

tkap vf/dkjh us viuh tkap fjiksVZ esa izkFkhZ ij yxk;s x;s nl

vkjksiksa esa ls fliQZ Ng vkjksi tksfd Øe'k% 1 ls 5 o vkjksi la[;k

8 gS] izkFkhZ ij fl¼ ik, gSa vkSj 'ks"k vkjksi fl¼ ugha ik, gSa blh

ls Li"V gS fd izkFkhZ ds vfHkdFku xyr gSa A

9- vizkFkhZ ds ;g Hkh izkDdFku gS fd izkFkhZ ds }kjk 'kk[kk

izca/d ds fo#¼ v'kksHkuh; vkSj viekutud Hkk"kk dk iz;ksx

fd;k x;k Fkk A cSad tSls foRrh; laLFkkuksa esa bl izdkj dh dk;Zokgh

fd;k tkuk xEHkhj nqjkpj.k gS A blfy, fl¼ gq, vkjksiksa ds

vuqikr esa izkFkhZ dks tks n.M fn;k x;k gS og mfpr ,oa oS/ gS A

vuq'kklfud izkf/dkjh us izkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr vkjksi&i=k ds tokc]

tkap i=kkoyh] izLrkfor n.M ds i=k ds fnukad 27&1&2003 ds

lUnHkZ esa tokc ,oa fyf[kr cgl ij fopkj djus ds ckn ,oa izkFkhZ

dks O;fDrxr lquokbZ dk volj nsrs gq, izkFkhZ dks lsok ls c[kkZLr

dk n.M fn;k Fkk A vihyh; izkf/dkjh us Hkh izkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr rF;ksa

,oa miyC/ fjdkMZ ds vk/kj ij izkFkhZ dks fn;s x;s n.M esa

la'kks/u djrs gq, mls lsokfuo`fRr dk ykHk nsrs gq, lsok&eqDr ds

n.M ls nf.Mr fd;k x;k gS A

10- tkap dh Ítqrk (fairness) ds izkjfEHkd fcUnq ij

fnukad 25&11&2010 dks fuEu vkns'k ikfjr fd;k x;k A

‘‘It is held that there was no denial of fairplay to the

workman and the domestic enquiry against him is found

to be fair and proper”.

11- tkWp dks mDr vkns'k }kjk Ítq ik;k x;k blfy,

ekeys ds xq.kkoxq.k ij lquk x;k A i=kkoyh dk voyksdu fd;k A

12- fopkj.kh; iz'u ;g gS fd D;k tkap vf/dkjh ds

fu"d"kZ =kqfViw.kZ gSa ;fn bldk mRrj udkjkRed vkrk gS ml fLFkfr

esa bl iz'u ij fopkj djuk gksxk fd D;k vf/jksfir n.M fl¼

gq, vkjksiksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, dBksj ,oa vuqikfrd gS \

13- izkFkhZ dks dqy 10 vkjksiksa ds fy, vkjksi i=k fn;k x;k

Fkk A muesa ls vkjksi la- 1 ls 5 o 8 dks gh izekf.kr ik;k gS A

blfy, orZeku ekeys esa os gh izklafxd gSa A ftu vkjksiksa dks

izekf.kr ik;k gS os fuEu gSa %&

ARTICLES OF CHARGES

(1) Riotous and Disorderly and indecent behavior

on the premises, of the Bank - GROSS

MISCONDUCT as defined in Para 19.5 (c) of the

first Bipartite Settlement dated 19-10-1966.

(2) Willful insubordination and disobedience of any

lawful and reasonable orders of the Branch Manager

- GROSS MISCONDUCT as defined in Para 19.5 (e)

of first Bipartite Settlement dated 19-1-1966.

(3) Failing to show proper consideration, courtesy

and attention towards officers, customers and other

employees of the Bank and unseemly and

unsatisfactory behavior while on duty - MINOR

MISCONDUCT as defined in Para 19.7 U) of the first

Bipartite Settlement dated 19-10-1966.

(4) Marked disregard for ordinary requirements of

decency -

MINOR MISCONDUCT as defined in Para 19.7 (k)

of the First Bipartite Settlement dated 19-10-1966.

(5) Willfull slowing down in the performance of

Bank's work-GROSS MISCONDUCT as defined in

Para 19.5 (g) of first Bipartite Settlement dated

19-10-1966.

(6) Doing an act prejudicial to the interest (reputation

and financial interest) of the Bank - GROSS

MISCONDUCT as defined in Para 19.5 (j) of the first

Bipartite Settlement dated 19-10-1966.

'IMPUTATION OF CHARGES

(A)(i) On 27th February, 1996 when you were

working as Receipt Cashier at about 11.50 A.M. The

Representative of "SAHARA INDIA", a very

valuable customer. of the branch came to your Cash

Receipt Counter for cash deposition but you refused

to accept his cash receipt. In view of your refusal to

accept his cash, he was left with no option but to

approach Branch Manager. You have accepted his

cash only on receipt of written instructions given

by Branch Manager "Please Accept" on his ‘‘Pay-

In-Slip.’’

(A)(ii) Shortly thereafter at about 12.50 P.M. on the

same day the representative of "Rajasthan State Road

Transport Corporation", Shri Jagdish approached

you for cash deposition. Instead of accepting the

cash of RSRTC, you again refused to accept the

cash from this valuable customer also and advised

him to approach Branch Manager. Consequently,

Shri Jagdish also approached the Branch Manager

for the same problem of the non-acceptance of cash

by you. At this juncture, the Branch Manager had

no other option but to instruct you in writing to

"please accept the cash" on the "Pay-In-Slip" of

RSRTC but instead of complying with the aforesaid

resonable and lawful orders of the Brach Manager,

you refuese to accept the cash from representative

of RSRTC.

(A)(iii) Having refused to accept cash from

representative of RSRTC, in blatant disregard of

written instruction of the Branch Manager, you did

not stop at that. Agitated and provoked at the

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4199

aforementioned written instructions, you entered

cabin of the Branch Manager and started addressing

him in highly derogatory, abusive and insulting

language. Your unsolicited and unwarranted address

to the Branch Manager at this juncture is quoted

verbatim as under:-

^^rqEgkjs cki dk ukSdj le> j[kk gS D;k\ tks ckj&ckj

vkns'k ns jgs gks A rqe vius dks rhl ekj [kka le> jgs gks] eSus rks

vPNs&vPNs eSustjksa ok vkj- ,e- rd dks ukd jxMokbZ gS A os

xzkgd D;k rqEgkjs cki yxrs gSa \ lkFk gh /edh Hkjs 'kCnksa dk

iz;ksx djrs gq, dgk fd ;fn fgEer gS rks jksMost dk dS'k fxuok

dj ns[k yksA** vkSj Hkh dkiQh xkyh&xyksp okys 'kCnksa dk iz;ksx

fd;k] ftls 'kkyhurk ds ukrs eSustj lkgc us fy[kuk mfpr ugha

le>k A

A number of valuable customers of the Bank present

in the Branch witnessed the unseemly, unruly, dis-

orderly and riotous scene created by you. Needless

to say, this caused grave damage and slur on the

Bank’s image and reputation.

14- tkap vf/dkjh }kjk fuEu fopkj.kh; fcUnq vo/kfjr

fd, x;s %&

v (i) D;k fnukad 27&2&1996 dks ds'k &dkmUVj ij dk;Z

djrs gq, izkFkhZ us lgkjk bf.M;k ds izfrfuf/ dks lgkjk bf.M;k dk

dS'k tek djus ls igys euk fd;k rFkk ckn esa izca/d ds }kjk

tek iphZ ij ‘Please except’ ds funsZ'k ds ckn tek Lohdkj dh

x;h\

v (ii) D;k fnukad 27&2&1996 dks ds'k dkmUVj ij dk;Z

djrs gq, izkFkhZ us yxHkx 12-50pm ij jksMost ds dSf'kvj Jh

txnh'k ls izca/d }kjk tek iphZ ij ‘‘Harsukh ji please ac-

cept 12.50 noon’’ ds fyf[kr funsZ'k ds ckn Hkh ds'k tek gsrq

Lohdkj ugha fd;k x;k A

v (iii) D;k 'kk[kk izca/d ds fyf[kr funsZ'kksa dh voKk dj]

jksMost ds ds'k dks Lohdkj u djds izkFkhZ us Øksf/r gksdj mDr

fnukad dks 'kk[kk izca/d ds dSfcu esa tkdj izca/d ls

vlH;rkiwoZd] viekutud o mÙksftr Hkk"kk esa xkyh&xykSp

fd;k vkSj bl rjg ds O;ogkj ls cSad ds xzkgd ds lkeus cSad dh

izfr"Bk dks vk?kkr yxk\

15- tkap vf/dkjh us lk{khx.k Jh iq#"kksÙke nkl fla?ky

(Mw-4) 'kk[kk izca/d Jh txnh'k lksuh jksdfM+;k] lgkjk bf.M;k

(Mw-1) dh ekSf[kd lk{; ,oa lgkjk bf.M;k dh tek iphZ

(MEx-2) ds vk/kj ij fcUnq la[;k v (i), dk rFkk lk{khx.k Jh

txnh'k dqekj xgyksr dSf'kvj jksMost (MW-4) Jh iqjQ"kksÙke nkl

fla?ky 'kk[kk izca/d MW-5 Jh fot; flag edokuk mi&izca/d

'kk[kk dh ekSf[kd lk{; ,oa tek iphZ MEx-3 ds vk/kj ij fcUnq

la- v (ii) dk mÙkj ldkjkRed ik;kA blh izdkj lk{khx.k Jh

iqjQ"kksÙke nkl fla?ky 'kk[kk izca/d MW4 Jh fot; flag edokuk

MW-3 Jh Mwxjey jksdfM+;k] vkn'kZ f'k{k.k lfefr MW-13

Jh pSuflag lsokfuo`Ùk 'kk[kk izca/d MW7 Jh ';kelqUnj >kyk.kh

fo'ks"k lgk;d] 'kk[kk dh ekSf[kd lk{; ,oa izys[kh; lk{; izn'kZ

MEx 5 f'kdk;r ckcr nqjkpj.k ,oa v'kksHkuh; O;ogkj ,oa vkn'kZ

f'k{k.k lfefr] ckM+esj ds dSf'k;j }kjk 'kk[kk izca/d ckM+esj dks

fy[ks i=k MEx-6 ds vk/kj ij fcUnq la- v (iii) dk mÙkj Hkh

ldkjkRed gksuk ik;kA

16- tkap vf/dkjh us viuh tkap fjiksVZ esa vkjksi la- 1 o 4

dks fopkj.kh; fcUnq v (iii) rFkk vU; izekf.kr vkjksiksa dks fopkj.kh;

fcUnq v (ii) o (iii) ds fu"d"kksZa ds vk/kj ij izekf.kr ik;k gSA

17- fo}ku izfrfuf/ izkFkhZ us tkap vf/dkjh }kjk izekf.kr

ik;s x;s vkjksiksa ds lEca/ esa fudkys x;s fu"d"kks± dks =kqfViw.kZ crkrs

gq, rdZ izLrqr fd;s gS fd izkFkhZ dks Kkiu fnukad 27&2&1998

DEx-1 dfFkr nqO;Zogkj ds lEca/ esa Li"Vhdj.k nsus gsrq fn;k x;k

FkkA mlesa fliQZ R.S.R.T.C. ds jksdfM+;k ls udn jkf'k tek u djus

dk gh vfHkdFku FkkA lgkjk bf.M;k ds izfrfuf/ ls /ujkf'k tek

u djus dk dksbZ mYys[k ugha Fkk ysfdu fnukad 28&2&1996 dks

lgk;d egkizca/d] {ks=kh; dk;kZy;] tks/iqj dks izca/d ds }kjk

dfFkr nqO;Zogkj ds lEca/ esa tks lwpuk DEx-2 izsf"kr dh xbZ mlesa

lgkjk bf.M;k ds izfrfuf/ ls Hkh fnukad 27&2&1996 dks 11-50

cts udn jkf'k tek u djus dk vfHkdFku tksM+ fn;k x;kA blds

vykok izkFkhZ ds fo:¼ udn jkf'k tek u djus ds lEca/ esa dksbZ

fyf[kr f'kdk;r ugha FkhA lgkjk bf.M;k ds lsDVj eSustj Jh

thojkt flag }kjk {ksf=k; dk;kZy;] tks/iqj dks izsf"kr i=k fnukad

4&4&1998 esa cSad izca/d Jh iqjQ"kksÙke nkl fla?ky ,oa vf/dkjh

Jh egs'k 'kekZ }kjk izkFkhZ ds fo:¼ f'kdk;r gsrq ncko Mkyus dk

mYys[k fd;k FkkA R.S.R.T.C.ds jksdfM+;k Jh txnh'k dqekj xgyksr

us Hkh tkap ds nkSjku izLrqr vius 'kiFk&i=k esa dgk Fkk fd fnukad

27&2&1996 dks mldh ekStwnxh esa fdlh ds lkFk xkyh&xykSp o

vHknz O;ogkj ugha gqvkA ysfdu bu rF;ksa ij tkap vf/dkjh }kjk

fopkj ugha fd;k x;kA fo}ku izfrfuf/ dk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd

vfHk;kstu i{k ds }kjk izLrqr 11 lk{khx.k esa ls 7 lk{khx.k us

izca/d ds lkFk dfFkr vf'k"V O;ogkj o vf'k"V Hkk"kk ds iz;ksx

dk dFku ugha fd;k gSA ftu lk{khx.k ds dFku gSa muesa fojks/kHkkl

o vlaxrk,a gSaA Jh ';kelqUnj >kyk.kh dk dFku gS fd dSfcu ls

vLi"V vkoktsa vk jgh Fkh rFkk mlds }kjk lquh vLi"V vkokt dh

tkudkjh Jh pSuflag dks nh rFkk Jh pSuflag dk dFku blh vk/kj

ij gSA bl izdkj mDr nksuksa lk{khx.k dh lk{; ls vkjksi lkfcr

ugha gksrsA fo}ku izfrfuf/ izkFkhZ dk rdZ gS fd lk{khx.k Jh

iqjQ"kksÙke nkl fla?ky 'kk[kk izca/d o Jh fot; flag edokuk] mi

izca/d dh lk{; esa rkfRod fcUnqvksa ij fojks/kHkkl gS o budh

lk{; dk foospu djus ij vkjksi izekf.kr ugha gksrsA fo}ku

izfrfuf/ dk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd lk{; esa ;g rF; vk;s gS fd izkFkhZ

12-30 ls 1-15 cts rd viuh lhV ij gh ugha FkkA lk{kh Jh

txnh'k xgyksr ds dFku ls Hkh izxV gksrk gS fd 12-30 P.M ij

'kk[kk izca/d ds lkFk vHknz O;ogkj dh dfFkr ?kVuk ds le;

izkFkhZ ogka ekStwn ugha FkkA ysfdu tkap vf/dkjh us bu rF;ksa ij Hkh

fopkj ugha fd;k gSA dsoy lk{khx.kksa ds c;kuksa rFkk i{kdkjksa ds

4200

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

rdksZa dk tkap fjiksVZ esa fooj.k fn;k gS A tkap vf/dkjh us nksuksa

i{kksa dh lk{; dk rqyukRed foospu ugha fd;k gS vkSj u gh

vkjksi izekf.kr ekuus ds dksbZ dkj.k n'kkZ;s gSaA blds vykok

izfrijh{kk dh lk{; dk Hkh lgh foospu ugha fd;k gSA blfy,

izekf.kr ekus x;s vkjksiksa ds fu"d"kZ =kwfViw.kZ gSaA

18- mDr rdksZa ds fojks/ esa fo}ku izfrfuf/ vizkFkhZ dk rdZ

gS fd izkFkhZ ds }kjk vkjksi i=k dk tokc izLrqr fd;k gS mlds rF;ksa

esa fojks/kHkkl gS ,oa mlesa izkFkhZ dh ;g Li"V LohdkjksfDr gS fd

'kk[kk izca/d us vkjksfir izkFkhZ dks lgkjk bf.M;k dk ds'k tek

djus ds fy, vkns'k fn;k FkkA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd ml fnu

izkFkhZ ds ikl dk;Z vf/d gksus dh ckr Hkh lgh ugha gSA izkFkhZ us

Lo;a us fnukad 27&2&1996 dh dSf'kvj fjlhV&cqd is'k dh gS

ftlds vuqlkj mlds }kjk dqy 12 tek;sa yxHkx 4-85 yk[k dh

tek dh xbZ gS o vfUre tek lgkjk bf.M;k dh gSA tcfd nwljs

dSf'kvj dh 9-47 yk[k dh 33 tek;s gSaA vr% Li"V gS fd izkFkhZ ds

ikl dk;Z vf/d ugha FkkA tek iphZ;k Ex-M-II & Ex-M-III ls Hkh

bl ckr dh iqf"V gksrh gS fd izkFkhZ }kjk tek djus ls badkj djus

ij tek djus gsrq izca/d dks funsZ'k nsus iM+sA

19- fo}ku izfrfuf/ vizkFkhZ dk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ us

fnukad 27&2&1996 dks R.S.R.T.C ds izfrfuf/ ds tek dS'k u

djus ds lEcaf/r vkjksi ds lanHkZ esa tokc esa dgk gS fd R.S.R.T.C.

ds izfrfuf/ ds vkus ls iwoZ nks cSad xzkgd lgkjk bf.M;k o Hkkjrh;

thou chek fuxe dh /ujkf'k ysuk 'ks"k Fkk o le; lekIr gksus

okyk Fkk rFkk mlds }kjk 'kk[kk izca/d dks ;g Li"V djus ij Hkh

fd uksV fxuus ds fy, vf/d le; ugha gS] 'kk[kk izca/d us nwljh

O;oLFkk dh FkhA blls Li"V gS fd 'kk[kk izca/d us funsZ'k fn;s Fks o

funsZ'k nsus ds ckn 'kk[kk izca/d ds dSfcu esa x;k FkkA blds vykok

dSf'kvj fjlhIV cqd (Ex-d-5) esa R.S.R.T.C. dh jkf'k tek ugha gS

o og jkf'k nwljs dSfjvj ds jftLVj esa tek gSA blls ;g Hkh Li"V

gS fd izkFkhz us 'kk[kk izca/d ds funsZ'kksa ds ckotwn R.S.T.C. dh

jkf'k tek ugha dh FkhA rF;ksa o ifjfLFkfr;ksa ls ;g fl¼ gS fd

lgkjk bf.M;k dh jkf'k ,oa R.S.T.C. dh jkf'k tek djus ls badkj

djus ij izkFkhZ dks fyf[kr funsZ'k fn;s x;s rFkk funsZ'kksa ds ckotwn

R.S.R.T.C. dh jkf'k tek ugha dh rFkk 'kk[kk izca/d ds dSfcu esa

tkdj jkf'k tek djus ls vleFkZrk O;Dr dh rFkk nqO;Zogkj

fd;kA vr% vkjksi la[;k 1 ls 5 o vkjksi la[;k 8 ds fy, izkFkhZ

dks nqjkpj.k dh nks"kh ikus ds lEca/ esa tkap vf/dkjh }kjk tks

fu"d"kZ fudkys x;s gSa og lgh gS o miyC/ rF;ksa ,oa lk{; ds

vk/kj ij mDr vkjksiksa dks fl¼ ekuus esa tkap vf/dkjh us dksbZ

=kqfV ugha dh gSA

20- eSaus mDr rdksZa ij euu fd;k rFkk mudks n`f"Vxr j[krs

gq, tkap iz=kkoyh dk è;kuiwoZd voyksdu fd;kA

21- Jh iq#"kksÙke nkl fla?ky 'kk[kk izca/d us vius dFku

eas dgk gS fd fnukad 27&2&1996 dks lgkjk bf.M;k ds izfrfuf/

Jh txnh'k lksuh us vkdj crk;k fd izkFkhZ us udn jkf'k tek djus

ls badkj dj fn;k rc MEx-2 tek iphZ ij ‘Please Accept’

fy[kdj mls funsZf'kr fd;kA lgkjk bf.M;k ds izfrfuf/ Mw-1 Jh

txnh'k lksuh us Hkh bl rF; dh iqf"V dh gS fd 11&11-30 cts og

udn jkf'k tek djus gsrq x;k Fkk rFkk izkFkhZ }kjk euk djus ij

izca/d ls feyk FkkA tek iphZ MEx-2 ls Hkh mDr dFkuksa dh iqf"V

gksrh gSA Lo;a izkFkhZ us tkap vf/dkjh ds le{k fn, vius dFku esa

dgk gS fd fnukad 27&2&1996 dks tc lgkjk bf.M;k dk izfrfuf/

mlds ikl jde tek djkus igyh ckj vk;k rc mlus ;g dgk Fkk

fd xzkgd vf/d gaS o jde Hkh vf/d tek djkbZ tk jgh gS

blfy, igys jkf'k tek gksuk laHko ugha gS mlds ckn og ^Dyh;fjax

gkml* pyk x;k Fkk rFkk ogka ls okil ykSVk rc lgkjk bf.M;k dk

izfrfuf/ O;oLFkkid ds vkns'k ysdj jde tek djus ds fy,

igys ls cSBk FkkA izkFkhZ ds dFku ls Hkh izca/d Jh iq#"kksÙke nkl

fla?ky ds dFku dh bl lhek rd iqf"V gksrh gS fd lgkjk bf.M;k

dk izfrfuf/ Jh txnh'k lksuh udn jkf'k tek djkus gsrq izkFkh ds

ikl x;k Fkk o mldk dS'k ml le; tek ugha fd;k x;k rFkk

O;oLFkkid ds }kjk tek djus gsrq funsZ'k fn, x;s FksA Dyh;fjax

gkml ls okil vkus ds ckn lgkjk bf.M;k dk dS'k izkFkhZ us tek

fd;kA

22- ;¼fi fnukad 27&2&1996 dks izkFkhZ }kjk vkns'kksa dh

vogsyuk djus o izca/d ds lkFk nqO;Zogkj djus ds lEca/ esa

Li"Vhdj.k nsus gsrq izkFkhZ dks izsf"kr Kkiu DEx-1 esa lgkjk bf.M;k

ds izca/d ls udn tek Lohdkj u djus dk Li"V mYys[k ugha

vk;k gS ysfdu ;s rF; vafdr gS fd ml fnu 11-50 ls gh izkFkhZ us

xzkgdksa ls udn tek Lohdkj djus ds fy, badkj djuk izkjaHk dj

fn;k rFkk xzkgdksa }kjk izca/d ls lEidZ djus ij tek Lohdkj

djus gsrq izkFkhZ dks funsZf'kr fd;k x;kA vr% fo}ku izfrfuf/ izkFkhZ

ds bl rdZ esa lkj izrhr ugha gksrk fd Kkiu DEx-1 fnukad

27&2&1996 esa lgkjk bf.M;k ls udn jkf'k tek u djus dk Li"V

mYys[k ugha gS] blfy, lgkjk bf.M;k dh jkf'k tek u djus dh

dgkuh euxa<+r gS ftls ckn esa fnukad 27&2&1996 dks lgk;d

izca/d {ks=kh; dk;kZy; dks izsf"kr lwpuk DEx-2 esa tksM+k x;k gSA

23- vkjksi i=k ds tokc fnukad 2&5&1996 esa izkFkhZ us dgk

gS fd lgkjk bf.M;k dk izfrfuf/ jde tek djkus gsrq vk;k mlh

le; jde izkIr dj jlhn ns nh FkhA mDr dFkukuqlkj izkFkhZ 11-30

ij lgkjk bf.M;k ds izfrfuf/ dks jde tek djus ls euk ugha

fd;kA tcfd mDr tokc esa gh vkxs fy[kk gS fd 'kk[kk dk;kZy;

esa djhc 1-15 cts ij tc igaqpk rks R.S.R.T.C. ls iwoZ vkus okys

xzkgd lgkjk bf.M;k rFkk Hkkjrh; thou chek fuxe [kM+s Fks

ftlds fy, iwoZ vkns'k 'kk[kk izca/d us fn, FksA blesa ;g Li"V

LohdkjksfDr gS fd 'kk[kk izca/d us dS'k tek djus ds fy, funs'k

fn;k FkkA dS'k tek djus gsrq funsZ'k ls gh ;g izxV gksrk gS fd izkFkhZ

ds }kjk dS'k tek u djus ij ;g funsZ'k nsus dh vko';drk gqbZA

24- izkFkhZ ;g dgdj vk;k gS fd xzkgd vf/d gksus ds

dkj.k lgkjk bf.M;k dh jde igys tek djuk laHko ugha FkkA

izkFkhZ us fnukad 27&2&1996 dks dSf'kvj fjlhV cqd fnukad

27&2&1996 dks tks mldh Lo;a dh gS] is'k dh gS] vkSj ,d vU;

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4201

dS'k cqd Hkh is'k dh gSA izkFkhZ ds }kjk dqy ckjg tek,a Lohdkj dh

xbZ gSA ftldh dqy jkf'k 4-85 yk[k #i;s ds yxHkx gS vafre

tek lgkjk bf.M;k dh gSA ftlds lEca/ esa tokc esa dgk gS fd

lgkjk bf.M;k dh jkf'k vkrs gh ys yh FkhA blds vykok nwljs

dSf'kvj dh fjlhV cqd esa cÙkhl tek,a yxHkx 9-47 yk[k dh gSaA

,slh fLFkfr esa fo}ku izfrfuf/ vizkFkhZ ds bl rdZ esa lkj izrhr gksrk

gS fd izkFkhZ ds ikl dk;Z vf/d gksus dh ckr fo'oluh; izrhr ugha

gksrhA

25- vr% vfHkys[k ij miyC/ mijksDr ekSf[kd] izysf[k;

,oa ikfjfLFkfrtU; lk{; ds vk/kj ij ;g ugha dgk tk ldrk fd

tkap vf/dkjh us ;g fu"d"kZ fudkyus esa =kqfV dh gS fd lgkjk

bf.M;k ds izfrfuf/ dh uxn jkf'k tek djus ls izkFkhZ us badkj

fd;k blfy, izca/d dks jkf'k tek djus ds fy, funsZ'k nsus iM+sA

26- fnukad 27&2&1996 dks gh R.S.R.T.C. ds izfrfuf/ dk

dS'k tek djus ls badkj djus ds laca/ esa Jh iqjQ"kksÙke nkl fla?ky

'kk[kk izca/d dk dFku gS fd ml fnu R.S.R.T.C ds jksdfM+;k Jh

txnh'k xgyksr us vkdj crk;k fd izkFkhZ udn jkf'k tek ugha dj

jgk gSA bl ij mlus tek iphZ ij ‘Harsukh ji please accept

12.50 Noon’ fy[kdj jkf'k tek djus gsrq funsZ'k fn;k FkkA mDr

dFku dh iqf"V jksdfM+;k R.S.R.T.C. Jh txnh'k xgyksr MW-2

ds dFku ,oa mlds }kjk izLrqr f'kdk;r ,oa tek iphZ MEx-3 ls

gksrh gSA blds vykok dSf'kvj fjlhV cqd ls ;g Hkh tkfgj gksrk gS

fd R.S.R.T.C. dh jkf'k izkFkhZ us tek ugha dh Fkh rFkk dk;Zokgd

eq[; jksdfM+;k ds }kjk jkf'k tek dh xbZ FkhA mijksDr lk{; ds

vk/kj ij tkap vf/dkjh dk ;g fu"d"kZ Hkh =kqfViw.kZ izrhr ugha

gksrk fd izkFkhZ ds }kjk R.S.R.T.C. dh jkf'k tek djus ls badkj

fd;k rFkk 'kk[kk izca/d ds funsZ'k ds ckotwn R.S.R.T.C. dh jkf'k

tek ugha dh xbZA

27- Jh iq#"kksÙke nkl fla?ky MW-4 us vius dFku esa dgk

gS fd jksMost ds dSf'kvj us tc dS'k tek u gksus dh ckr dgh

rc mlds }kjk tek iphZ ij izkFkhZ dks funsZ'k fn;s x;s FksA mDr iphZ

ysdj tc jksMost dk dSf'kvj izkFkhZ ds ikl x;k rks izkFkhZ mlds

dSfcu esa vk;k o xkyh&xykSp 'kq: dj fn;kA

28- izkFkhZ }kjk 'kk[kk izca/d ds dSfcu esa tkdj mÙksftr

gksdj viekutud Hkk"kk esa nqO;Zogkj djus ds vkjksi ds lanHkZ esa

Jh iq#"kksÙke nkl fla?ky 'kk[kk izca/d ds dFku dh iqf"V Jh

fot; flag edokuk] mi&izca/d us Hkh dh gSA bl lEca/ esa fnukad

27&2&1996 dks 'kk[kk esa mifLFkr Jh fot; flag edokuk

mi&izcaèkd o Jh egs'k pUnz xxZ vf/dkjh us la;qDr gLrk{kfjr

i=k MEx-5 egklfpo] nh cSad vkWiQ jktLFkku ,lksfl,'ku] t;iqj

dks izsf"kr fd;k FkkA ftldh izfr {ks=kh; dk;kZy;] tks/iqj dks Hkh

izsf"kr dh Fkh mDr i=k esa izkFkhZ ds }kjk fd;s x;s nqO;Zogkj ds ckjs esa

fy[kk x;k FkkA

29- mijksDr lk{; ds vykok izca/u esa Jh ';kelqUnj

>kyk.kh MW-7 Jh pSuflag MW-13 ,oa Jh Mwaxjey MW-3 dh

Hkh lk{; djokbZ gSA Jh ';kelqUnj >kyk.kh us dFku esa dgk gS fd

izkFkhZ o izca/d ds chp xeZtks'kh ds lkFk okrkZyki gks jgk Fkk o

ckgj vLi"V vkoktsa vk jgh Fkh o xokg Jh Mawxjey MW-3 us

Hkh mDr ckr dgh gSA xokg Jh pSu flag MW-13 us dFku fd;k

gS fd mls Jh ';kelqUnj >kyk.kh us crk;k fd O;oLFkkid ds

dSfcu ls 'kksj&'kjkcs dh vkoktsa vk jgh gaSA rc mlus gjlq[k dks

ckgj cqyk;k o iwNk rks crk;k fd dS'k ysdj fxuus dks >xM+k gSA

30- tkap vf/dkjh ds }kjk cpko i{k ds }kjk izLrqr rdksZa

ij euu djus ds ckn ,oa izca/d dh lk{; dk foospu djus ds

ckn izca/u }kjk izLrqr izys[k MEx-5, MEx-6 ,oa ekSf[kd lk{;

ds vk/kj ij gh ;g fu"d"kZ fudkyk gS fd izkFkhZ 'kk[kk izca/d ds

dSfcu esa x;k o vekutud ,oa mÙksftr Hkk"kk esa xkyh&xykSp dhA

31- izkFkhZ us vius tokc esa dgk gS fd vkjksiksa esa ;g dgha

Hkh Li"V ugha gS fd 'kk[kk izca/d ds }kjk funsZ'k fn, tk pqds Fks rks

muds dejs esa tkus dk iz'u D;ksa mRiUu gqvk ysfdu tokc esa ;g

Hkh dgk gS fd 'kk[kk izca/d dks mlds }kjk ;g Li"V fd;k x;k

fd R.S.R.T.C. ds izfrfuf/ ds vkus ls iwoZ nks cSad xzkgd dh jkf'k

ysuk 'ks"k Fkk vkSj cSad le; 2 cts lekIr gksus okyk Fkk] o uksV

fxuus ds fy, vf/d le; ugha gSA tokc esa ;g Hkh ekuk gS fd

izca/d }kjk nwljh O;oLFkk dh xbZA tkap vf/dkjh ds le{k ftjg

esa Hkh ;g Lohdkj fd;k gS fd O;oLFkkid }kjk Jh txnh'k

jksdfM+;k R.S.R.T.C. dh jkf'k tek djus gsrq funsZ'k ds lEca/ esa

mlus O;oLFkkid dks tkdj viuh fLFkfr Li"V dh FkhA vi'kCnksa

dk iz;ksx ugha fd;kA blls ;g Li"V gS fd 'kk[kk izca/d }kjk mls

funsZ'k fn, x, o mlds ckn 'kk[kk izca/d ds dSfcu esa x;kA

vfHkys[k ij vk, rF;ksa ls ;g Hkh Li"V gS fd funsZ'k ds ckotwn

jkf'k tek ugha dh Fkh o vU; dS'kh;j ds }kjk jkf'k tek dh xbZA

izkFkhZ us dSfcu esa tkdj Lo;a ds dFkukuqlkj vleFkZrk O;Dr dh

FkhA mDr ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa tkap vf/dkjh ds }kjk tks fu"d"kZ fudkys

x;s gSa mUgsa =kqfViw.kZ ugha dgk tk ldrkA

32- ;g lqfuf'pr fof/ gS fd tgka tkap dks mfpr o ½tq

ik;k x;k gks o tkap vf/dkjh us miyC/ lk{; ds vk/kj ij

fu"d"kZ fudkys gkas U;k;kf/dj.k dks vihyh; U;k;ky; dh rjg

lk{; dk iqu% fo'ys"k.k o foospu djrs gq, Lo;a ds mlls fHkUu

fu"d"kZ fudkyus dk {ks=kkf/dkj ugha gSA tkap vf/dkjh ds fu"d"kks±

ds lanHkZ esa ml fLFkfr esa gLr{ksi fd;k tk ldrk gS tc fu"d"kZ

=kqfViw.kZ gksA

33- ;g Hkh lqfuf'pr fof/ gS fd fu"d"kZ dks =kqfViw.kZ rHkh

dgk tk ldrk gS tc fu"d"kZ fdlh lk{; ij vk/kfjr ugha gS] ;k

;qfDr;qDr :i ls tkap ls lacaf/r miyC/ lkexzh ds vk/kj ij

tkap vf/dkjh }kjk fudkys x;s fu"d"kksZa ij igaqpus ds fy, dksbZ

vk/kj ugha gS rFkk fu"d"kZ Extraneous consideration ds vk/kj

ij fudkys x;s gaS ;k tks fu"d"kZ fudkys x;s gSa oks iw.kZr;k vfo'oluh;

lk{; ds vk/kj ij gaSA ;fn vfHkys[k ij dqN lk{; gSa tks Lohdkj

fd;s tkus ;ksX; gks rks mlds vk/kj ij fudkys fu"d"kksZa dks =kqfViw.kZ

ugha dgk tk ldrkA lk{; dh vi;kZIrk ds vk/kj ij Hkh fu"d"kZ

dks =kqfViw.kZ ugha ekuk tk ldrkA

4202

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

34- orZeku ekeys esa tkap dks Ítq ,oa mfpr ik;k x;k gS

rFkk tkap vf/dkjh }kjk tks fu"d"kZ fudkys x;s gSa og vfHkys[k

ij miyC/ lk{; ds vk/kj ij fudkys gSa rFkk lk{; dk foospu o

fo'ys"k.k Hkh fd;k gS A blfy, ;g ugha dgk tk ldrk fd fu"d"kZ

lk{; ij vk/kfjr ugha gS ;k fudkys x;s fu"d"kks± ij igqapus ds

fy, dksbZ vk/kj gh ugha Fkk A ;fn miyC/ lk{; ds vk/kj ij

fHkUu fu"d"kZ lEHko Hkh gks rks bl vk/kj ij tkap

vf/dkjh }kjk fudkys x;s fu"d"kks± ls vlger gksrs gq, fHkUu

fu"d"kZ ugha fudkys tk ldrs A ekSf[kd ,oa ifjfLFkrtU; lk{;

ds vk/kj ij vf/lHkkO;rk dh izcyrk dks ns[kk tkuk Fkk A vkjksiksa

dks lUnsg ls iwjs lkfcr djuk visf{kr ugha Fkk A lk{; esa dqN

fcUnqvksa ij fojks/kHkkl ;k vlaxrrkvksa ;k dqN lk{khx.k dh lk{;

dh fo'oluh;rk lUnsgiwoZ gksus ds vk/kj ij 'ks"k lk{; dks vLohdkj

ugha fd;k tk ldrk A blfy, vihyh; U;k;ky; dh jkg lk{;

dk iqu% foospu o fo'ys"k.k djrs gq, orZeku ekeys esa tkap

vf/dkjh }kjk fudkys x;s fu"d"kks± ls fHkUu fu"d"kZ fudkyus dk

vf/dkj bl U;k;kf/dj.k dks ugha gS A tkap vf/dkjh ds }kjk

miyC/ lk{; ds vk/kj fudkys x;s fu"d"kks± ds lEcU/ esa

vf/dj.k ;g dgrs gq, fHkUu fu"d"kZ ugha fudky ldrk fd

miyC/ lk{; ds vk/kj ij vU; fu"d"kZ fudkyk tkuk Hkh lEHko

gS A

35- mijksDr foospu ds vuqlkj tkap vf/dkjh }kjk izekf.kr

ik;s x;s vkjksiksa ds lUnHkZ esa fudkys x;s fu"d"kks± dks =kqfViw.kZ ugha

ik;k tk ldrk A

36- fo}ku izfrfuf/ izkFkhZ dk rdZ gS fd vihyh; izkf/dkjh

us izkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr fyf[kr cgl esa mBk;s x;s fcUnqvksa ij fopkj

fd;s fcuk gh tkap vf/dkjh o vuq'kklfud izkf/dkjh ds fu"d"kks±

ls lgerh trkrs gq, vkjksiksa dks izekf.kr eku fy;k vihyh;

izkf/dkjh }kjk bu rF;ksa ij Hkh foPkkj ugha fd;k fd izkFkhZ ds fo#¼

leLr dk;Zokgh tYnckth esa dh xbZ rFkk izcU/d us

}s"krk ds dkj.k eux<+r vkjksi yxk, gSa rFkk lgkjk bf.M;k ds

izfrfuf/ ij f'kdk;r fy[kus gsrq vuqfpr ncko Mkyk x;k A

blfy;s vihyh; izkf/dkjh ds fu"d"kZ fof/ lEer ugha gS A

37- fo}ku izfrfuf/ vizkFkhZ dk dguk gS fd vihyh;

izkf/dkjh us izkFkhZ dks lquokbZ dk i;kZIr volj nsus ,oa i=kkoyh ij

miyC/ lHkh rF;ksa ij xgu fopkj djus ds ckn tkap vf/dkjh ds

fu"d"kks± ls lgerh trkbZ gS A

38- mDr rdks± ij euu fd;k vihyh; izkf/dkjh ds vkns'k

ds voyksdu ls izxV gksrk gS fd mlds }kjk izkFkhZ ds }kjk izLrqr

fyf[kr cgl ,oa miyC/ ekSf[kd ,oa izysf[k; lk{; ij fopkj

djus ,oa lk{; dk foospu djus ds ckn gh vkns'k ikfjr fd;k gS A

vkns'k esa izkFkhZ }kjk fnukad 31&3&2004 ds nks i=kksa ds tfj;s tks

fyf[kr cgl izLrqr dh xbZ ml ij fopkj djus ds rF; esa

mYys[k gS A vkns'k ds voyksdu ls izdV gksrk gS fd izkFkhZ dks

O;fDrxr :i ls lquokbZ dk volj fn;k gS rFkk izkFkhZ ds }kjk ftu

eq[; fcUnqvksa dks fyf[kr cgl esa mBk;k x;k mu ij fopkj djrs

gq, lk{; dk foospu dj foLr`r vkns'k ikfjr fd;k gS A lk{khx.k

yksds'k ekFkqj Mw-8 ,oa xkSre pUæ esgrk Mw-9 dh lk{; dk

foospu djrs gq, lk{; dks fo'oluh; ugha ekuk gS rFkk leLr

rF;ksa ij lexz :i ls fopkj djrs gq, vuq'kklfud izkf/dkjh

}kjk fn, x;s n.M esa la'kks/u djrs gq, lsokfuo`fÙk dk ykHk nsrs gq,

lsok eqDr ds n.M ls nf.Mr fd;k gS A blfy, bl lEcU/ esa

fo}ku izfrfuf/ }kjk izLrqr rdZ Lohdkj fd;s tkus ;ksX; ugha gS

39- fnukad 25&11&2010 ds vkns'k }kjk izkFkhZ ds fo#¼

tkWp dks Ítq (fair) o mfpr ik;k gS rFkk tkap vf/dkjh }kjk

tkap ds vk/kj ij tks fu"d"kZ fudkys x;s gSa mUgsa Hkh =kqfViw.kZ gksuk

ugha ik;k x;k gS] blfy, fopkj.kh; iz'u ;g jg tkrk gS fd D;k

vkjksiksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, vf/jksfir n.M dBksj o vuuqikfrd

gS A

40- fo}ku izfrfuf/ izkFkhZ dk dguk gS vihyh; izkf/dkjh us

vuq'kklfud vf/dkjh }kjk vkjksfir fd, x, c[kkZLrxh ds n.Mkns'k

dks ;|fi de djds uohuhÑr fd;k gS vkSj izkFkhZ dks lsokfuo`fÙk

ifjykHk fnyk, x, gSa ysfdu izkFkhZ ds fo#¼ ,sls xEHkhj nqjkpj.k

dk ekeyk ugha gS ftlds dkj.k cSad dks viwrZuh; ;k ekSfæd {kfr

gqbZ gks A izkFkhZ yxHkx 16 o"kks± ls cSad lsok esa ;k yxHkx bruh gh

vof/ lsok esa 'ks"k Fkh A iwoZ esa fdlh nqjkpj.k ds ekeys esa nks"kh

ekuus dk ekeyk Hkh ugha Fkk] blfy;s lsok ls gVk, tkus dk n.M

+vkjksfir fd;k tkuk U;k; lEer ugha dgk tk ldrk A vius

rdks± ds leFkZu esa (2010) 2 SCC Page 236] (2009) (1)

RLW 1312(Raj.). (1998) (II) LLJ, 923 (Kerala), 1994 (I) LLJ

586 (J &K), 1983, (I) SLR, 628, 1983 FLR (62) 100 (SC), 1984

FLR (64) 433 (SC), 1996 (I) LLN 14 (SC), 1997 (I) LLN 69

(SC), 2005 (100) FLR 1218 (SC) ds n`"VkUrksa dks izLrqr fd;k gS A

41- mDr rdks± ds fojks/ esa fo}ku izfrfuf/ vizkFkhZ dk rdZ

gS fd izkFkhZ dks fn;k x;k lsokeqfDr dk n.M mfpr ,oa oS/ gS rFkk

izkFkhZ ds fo#¼ vkjksiksa dh xEHkhjrk ds vuqikr esa gS A mudk ;g

Hkh dguk gS fd cSad tSls foÙkh; laLFkku esa xzkgdksa dh tek;s

Lohdkj ugha djuk 'kk[kk izca/d ds funsZ'kksa ds ckn Hkh xzkgdksa dh

jkf'k tek ugha djuk rFkk izca/d ds lkFk nqO;Zogkj xEHkhj nqjkpj.k

gS A blfy, ,sls ekeys esa vkjksfir n.M esa dksbZ gLr{ksi djus dk

dksbZ mfpr vk/kj ugha gS A bl lEcU/ esa mUgksaus 1996] LLR,

1129 (SC), 2006 LLR, 252 (SC), 2005 LLR, 360, (SC), 2006

LLR, 415 (Kerala), 2011 LLR, 934 (Karnataka), 2006 LLR,

296 (SC) 2005 LLR, 878 (Kerala) ds n`"VkUrksa dks izLrqr fd;k gSA

42- eSaus mDr rdks± ,oa izLrqr n`"VkUrksa esa izfrikfnr fl¼kUrksa

ij euu fd;k A

43- ;g dkuwuh fLFkfr fookfnr ugha gS fd vkS|ksfxd fookn

vf/fu;e dh 1947 dh /kjk 11&A ds vUrxZr iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa ds

vUrxZr tgka fdlh Jfed dh lsokUeqfDr ;k inP;qfr ds lEcU/ esa

dksbZ ekeyk gks rks U;k;fu.kZ;u dh dk;Zokfg;ksa ds vuqØe esa

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4203

vf/dj.k ds ;g lek/ku gksus ij dh lsokUeqfDr ;k inP;qfr dk

vkns'k U;k;ksfpr ugha gS] ogka og vius vf/fu.kZ; }kjk ,sls vkns'k

dks vikLr dj ,sls n.M ds cnys U;wurj n.M ns ldrk gS] tSls fd

ekeys dh ifjfLFkfr esa visf{kr gks A

44- nksuksa i{k ds fo}ku izfrfuf/x.k us vius rdks± ds leFkZu

esa 1996] LLR, 1129 (SC) ,oa 2005 LLR 360 (SC), U;k;n`"VkUrksa

dks is'k fd;k gS A

45- 1996 esa] LLR 1129 (SC) NEW SHORROK MILLS

V/s. MAHESHBHAI T. RAO ds ekeys esa cnyh Jfed us

miizcU/d ds dejs esa tkdj xkfy;ks nh rFkk /edh nh dh fey

ds vf/dkjh feyds ckgj lqjf{kr ugha jgasxs A ;fn pkj&ikap

vfèkdkfj;ksa dh gR;k ds fy, mls tsy tkuk iMs+ rks Hkh og ijokg

ugha djrk A mls lsok ls mUeksfpr djus ds n.M ls nf.M+r fd;k x;k

Fkk] ysfdu mDr Jfed dks iwoZ esa Hkh dbZ ckj ,sls nqjkpj.k ds

ekeys esa nf.M+r fd;k x;k Fkk A mDr ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa ekuuh;

loksZÙke U;k;ky; us mUeksfpr djus ds n.M+ dks vuuqikfrd ugha

ekuk A blh izdkj 2005 LLR 360 (SC)MAHINDRA AND

MAHINDRA LTD. V/s. N.B. NARAVADE, etc.esa Jfed ij

Hkn~nh Hkk"kk esa mPp vf/dkfj;ksa dks xkyh&xykSp djus dk ekeyk

Fkk ysfdu mDr ekeys esa Hkh Jfed dks iwoZ esa ,d ls vf/d ckj

pktZ'khV nh xbZ Fkh rFkk muesa ls ,d Jfed ij ikbi ls vius

lkFkh ij geyk dj xEHkhj pksV igqapkus dk vkjksi Fkk blfy,]

ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; us mlds leLr vkpj.k dks n`f"Vxr

j[krs gq, lsok ls c[kkZLrxh ds n.M dks vuqikfrd ugha ekuk A

46- 2011 LLR 934 Karnatka State Road Transport

Corporation, V/s. P. Selvaraj. ds ekeys esa vipkjh ij mPp

vf/dkfj;ksa ls vHkæ xkyh&xykSp djus] nqO;Zogkj djus o mu ij

geyk djus o dkWiksZjs'ku dh lEifÙk dks uqdlku igqapkus ds vkjksi

Fks o blls iwoZ Hkh N% nqjkpj.k ds ekeyksa esa mldks y?kq n.M+ ls

nf.M+r fd;k x;k Fkk A mDr ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa mipkjh dks ukSdjh ls

c[kkZLr djus ds n.M dks mfpr ekuk A 2006 LLR 415

(Kerala)South Indian Bank V/s. V.G. Krishan Kumar &

Another esa czkUp eSustj ds lkFk xkyh&xykSp djus dk vkjksi

lkfcr ik;k x;k Fkk rFkk iwoZ esa Hkh bl rjg dk nqO;Zogkj djus dk

vkjksi Fkk A

47- mijksDr izdj.kksa esa lEcfU/r vipkjhx.k dk iwoZ

vkpj.k Hkh [kjkc jgk Fkk rFkk iwoZ esa Hkh nqjkpj.k ds ekeys muds

fo#¼ Fks A ij orZeku ekeys esa izkFkhZ ds iwoZ vkpj.k [kjkc jgus

;k iwoZ esa fdlh izdkj dk nqO;Zogkj djus dk dksbZ rF; vfHkys[k

ij ugha vk;k gS A vr% orZeku ekeys ds rF; mijksDr n`"VkUrksa

ds rF;ksa ls fHkUu gS A blh izdkj n`"VkUr 2006 LLR 252, dukZVdk

cSad cuke ,- ,y- eksgu jko ds ekeys ds Í.k ftls fn;k tkuk

Fkk] mls Í.k u nsdj fdlh vU; dks iQthZ Í.k nsus gsrq "kM+;U=k

djus dk ekeyk Fkk A 2006 LLR 296 L.K. Verma V/s. HMT

Ltd. ds ekeys esa Hkn~nh xkfy;ka nsus ds vykok ,d gh vof/ eas

anks fHkUu&fHkUu txg dkuiqj ,oa jk;cjsyh esa Øe'k% fMIyksek

dkslZ djus rFkk bf.M;u VsyhiQksu b.M~LVht esa dke djus o ,d

gh le; esa bykgkckn esa 'kiFk&i=k vkSFk&deh'uj ds le{k

rLnhd djokus o dkj[kkus esa mifLFkfr fn[kkus ds vkjksi Hkh Fks A

blfy, ekeyksa esa lsok ls gVkus ds n.M dks vuuqikfrd ekuk A

vr% buds rF; Hkh orZeku ekeys ls fHkUu gSa A

48- 2005 LLN (3) 238 (xqtjkr) esa vknru lg&Jfedksa

,oa mPp vf/dkfj;ksa ds lkFk nqO;Zogkj djus o xkyh&xyksp djus

ds ekeys esa ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; us izfrikfnr fd;k fd lq/kjus

dk volj mlh ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa fn;k tk ldrk gS fd tc nqO;Zogkj

dk igyk ekeyk gks A vknru nqO;Zogkj djus ds lkFk dksbZ ujeh

ugha cjrh tk ldrh A mDr U;k; n`"VkUr ls fo}ku izfrfuf/ izkFkhZ

ds bl rdZ dks leFkZu feyrk gS] fd tgka iwoZ vkpj.k vPNk jgk

gks rFkk vipkjh ij nqO;Zogkj djus dk dksbZ igyk ekeyk gks rks

n.M nsus ds ekeys esa mnkjrk cjrh tk ldrh gS A

49- 1994 F.J.R. (64) 442 (S.C.) VED PRAKASH GUPTA

V/s. DELTON CABLE INDIA PRIVATE LTD. ds ekeys esa

vipkjh ij fuEu vkjksi Fkk %&

‘‘That on 1-8-1979 as per instructions of IMI

department, one Mr. Hira Lal, the worker of IMI

department, was sent to the gate office in-connection

with a challan of a water pump. As the worker, i. e.

said Mr. Hira Lal, did not come back to IMI

department for quite some time, Mr. S.K. Bagga,

Junior Engineer of IMI department personally went

to the gate office. He (S.K. Bagga) apprised Mr. Deep

Chand, Senior Security Officer, of the irresponsible

manner in which you delivered the challan to the

person of M/s. Gurumukh Dass instead of to IMI

department. When Mr. Deep Chand further verified

this fact from you, you showed ignorance and

demanded to know the name of the person who had

said so. When informed that it was Durg Singh you

without any rhyme or reason or provocation abused

Shri Durg Singh in a filthy manner saying (translated

in English as -I fuck the mother of Durg Singh; bring

him). You were advised that being a responsible

employee and that too belonging to the security

department, you should not abuse any employee

but you continued in hot temper and demanded Mr.

Durg Singh to be called in the gate office. When Shri

Durg Singh was brought and in your presence he

once again confirmed and reiterated that you had

given the challan to the person of M/s. Gurumukh

Dass, you lost all your senses and started abusing

Shri S.K. Bagga left and right in as filthy derogatory

and abusive manner. You said (translated in English

as-you should try hard to your gandh; you cannot

do anything wrong to meet you may go to Ram

Kumar or you may go to Vijay Kumar).

4204

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

50. mDr ekeys esa mDr vkjksi ds lUnHkZ esa n.M+ ds lEcU/

esa fopkj djrs gq, ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; us ;g vfHkfu/kZfjr

fd;k gS fd%—

‘‘There is nothing on record to show that any

previous adverse remark against the appellant had

been taken into consideration by the management

for awarding the extreme penalty of dismissal from

service to the appellant even if he had in fact abused

in filthy language Durg Singh and S.K. Bagga. We

are, therefore, of the opinion that the punishment

awarded to the appellant is shockingly

disproportionate regard being had to the charge

framed against him. We are also of the opinion that

no responsible employer would ever impose in like

circumstances the punishment of dismissal to the

employee and that victimization or unfair labour

practice could well be inferred from the conduct of

the management in awarding the extreme punishment

of dismissal for a flimsy charge of abuse of some

worker or officer of the management by the appellant

within the premises of the factory. We, therefore,

hold that the termination of the appellant’s service is

invalid and unsustainable in law.”

51. 1996 (1) LLN 14 Ram Kishan V/s. Union of India

and Others esa iqfyl ds flikgh }kjk mPp vf/dkjh dks xkyh nsus

dk ekeyk Fkk A n.M dh vuuqikfrdrk ij fopkj djrs gq,

ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; us ;g vfHkfu/kZfjr fd;k gS fd%&

‘‘When abusive language in used by any body

against a superior, it must be understood in the

environment in which that person is situated and the

circumstances surrounding the event that led to the

use of the abusive language. No straight-jacket

formula could be evolved in adjudging whether the

abusive language in the given circumstances would

warrant dismissal from service, Each case has to be

considered on its own facts.”

‘‘What was the nature of the abusive language used

by the appellant was not stated. On the facts of this

case held that dismissal from service is harsh and

disproportionate to gravity of charge. Imposition of

stoppage of two increments with cumulative effect

would be appropriate punishment.”

52. 1983 FLR (62) 100 (SC) jekdkUr feJk cuke mÙkj

izns'k jkT; ds ekeys esa osru esa vuqifLFkfr o foyEc ls mifLFkr

gksus ds lEcU/ esa dVkSrh djus ls ukjkt gksdj vipkjh us mPp

vf/dkjh dks fuEu vHkæ 'kCn dgs Fks %&

‘‘Are other persons your father ? I will make you

forget your high handeness either here or somewhere

else. An Officer of yesterday’s making discloses

power consciousness”

53. ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; us mDr vkjksi ds fy, lsok ls

c[kkZLrxh ds vkns'k dks mfpr ugha ekurs gq, vfHkfu/kZfjr fd;k gS

fd%&

‘‘Appellant was Secretary of the workmen’s Union.

The respondent-management has not shown that

there was any blameworthy conduct of the appellant

during the period of 14 years service he rendered

prior to the date of misconduct and the misconduct

consists of language indiscreet, improper of

disclosing a threatening posture. When it is said

that language discloses a threatening posture it is

the subjective conclusion of the person who hears

the language because voice modulation of each

person in the society differs and indiscreet, improper,

abusive language may show lack of culture but merely

the use of such language on one occasion

unconnected with any subsequent positive action

and not preceded by any blameworthy conduct

cannot permit an extreme penalty of dismissal from

service. Therefore, we are satisfied that the order of

dismissal was not justified in the facts and

circumstances of the case and the Court must

interfere.”

54. vf/fu;e dh /kjk 11&A ds vUrxZr mUekspu ;k gVk;s

tkus ds LFkku ij de n.M vf/jksfir djus dh 'kfDr vf/dj.k

dks iznÙk dh xbZ gS A ;g lgh gS fd vuq'kklukRed izkf/dkjh }kjk

vf/jksfir fd, x;s n.M ds lkFk gLr{ksi djus dh ;g 'kfDr

lhfer gsS A ;g Hkh lgh gS fd n.M dks vlaxr gksuk ;k vU; dksbZ

vYihdj.k ifjfLFkfr ;k deZdkj dk iwoZ vkpj.k tSls dkj.kksa ds

vHkko esa dsoy lgkuqHkwfr ds vk/kj ij mDr iznÙk 'kfDr dk

iz;ksx djuk visf{kr ugha gS A ysfdu tgk¡ lsok ls mUeksfpr ls

vf/jksfir n.M vkjksiksa dks ns[krs gq, n.M dBksj o vuqikfrd gks

rks ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; ds mDr U;k;n`"VkUrksa esa izfrikfnr

fl¼kUrksa ds vuqlkj mls de n.M+ esa ifjo£rr fd;k tk ldrk

gS A

55- orZeku ekeys esa izkFkhZ ij vkjksi Fkk fd mlus lgkjk

bf.M+;k ds izfrfuf/ ls udn jkf'k izkIr dj tek djus ls bUdkj

fd;k rFkk eSustj ds funsZ'k fn;s tkus ds ckn ml jkf'k dks tek

fd;k A ml ij ;g Hkh vkjksi Fkk fd mlus R.S.R.T.C. ds

izfrfuf/ ls Hkh udn jkf'k izkIr dj tek djus dh ctk; mls czkUPk

eSustj ls lEidZ djus ds fy, dgk A og mlds }kjk funsZ'k nsus ds

ckn Hkh jkf'k dks tek ugha fd;k x;k rFkk fyf[kr funsZ'k fns, tkus

ls mÙksftr gksdj czkUp eSustj ds lkFk xkyh&xykSp okys 'kCnksa dk

iz;ksx fd;k A vkjksi esa ;g ugha crk;k x;k gS fd fdu xkyh&xykSp

okys 'kCnksa dk iz;ksx fd;k x;k A blds vykok izkFkhZ dh yEch

lsok vof/ ds nkSjku iwoZ esa mlds }kjk nqO;Zogkj djus ds dksbZ rF;

vfHkys[k ij ugha vk, gaS A izkFkhZ ij fdlh jkf'k dk nq£ofu;ksx

djus ;k vizkFkhZ dks /ks[kk dkfjr djus dk ekeyk ugha gS A vr%

orZeku ekeys esa izkFkhZ ij tks vkjksi lkfcr ik;s x;s gSa mudks

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 3] [email protected] 12] 1935

4205

n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, izkFkhZ dks lsok esa mUeksfpr djus dk n.M+ dBksj

o vuqikfrd gksuk izrhr gksrk gS A

56- izkFkhZ dks ftu vkjksiksa ds fy, nks"kfl¼ ik;k gS mudks

ns[krs gq, ml ij vf/jksfir lsok ls mUeqDr djus dk n.M dBksj

,oa vuuqikfrd gS rFkk izkFkhZ dk iwoZ lsok jsdkMZ csnkx ugha jgk ;k

iwoZ vkpj.k [kjkc jgk gks ,slk Hkh dksbZ vfHkdFku izkFkhZ ds fo#¼

ugha gS] blfy, leLr rF;ksa ij lexz :i ls fopkj djrs gq, izkFkhZ

dks lsok ls mUeksfpr djus ds vf/jksfir n.M dks vikLr dj fcuk

cdk;k osru ls lsok esa cgky djrs gq, rhu ok£"kd&o`f¼ lap;h

izHkko ls jksdus dk n.M fn;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr gksxk A

57- rnuqlkj] ;g r; fd;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZ dks lsok ls

^fMLpktZ* djus dk n.M dBksj o vuuqikfrd gksus ds dkj.k

vkns'k fnukad 6&4&2004 }kjk vf/jksfir n.M+ U;k;ksfpr ugha gS A

mDr vkns'k esa vf/jksfir n.M dks vikLr dj izkFkhZ ij mls ns;

rhu ok£"kd osru o`f¼;k¡ lap;h izHkko ls jksdus dk n.M+ vf/jksfir

fd;k tkrk gS A izkFkhZ lsok esa fujUrjrk ds lkFk iqu% cgky gksus dk

vf/dkjh gS A rFkkfi] izkFkhZ cdk;k osru dh jkf'k izkIr djus dk

vf/dkjh ugha gksxk A U;k;fu.kZ;u gsrq izsf"kr funsZ'k (jsiQjsUl)dk

mÙkj mDr izdkj fn;k tkrk gS A iapkV rnkuqlkj ikfjr fd;k tkrk

gS A

59- iapkV dh izfrfyfi dsUnzh; ljdkj dks vkS|ksfxd fookn

vf/fu;e] 1947 dh /kjk 17(1) ds vUrxZr izdk'kukFkZ izsf"kr dh

tkos A

,u- ds- iqjksfgr] ihBklhu vf/dkjh

ubZ fnYyh] 16 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1610-—dsUæ ljdkj] lwpuk dk vf/dkj

vf/fu;e] 2005 (2005 dh la[;k 22) dh /kjk 2 (x) ds lkFk

ifBr /kjk 5(1) ds vUrxZr iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,

vkSj fnukad 11 tuojh] 2011 dh lela[;d vf/lwpuk dk

vf/Øe.k djrs gq, Je vkSj jkstxkj ea=kky; esa Jh pkuu jke]

funs'kd] Je vkSj jkstxkj ea=kky; dks bl ea=kky; vkSj bl

ea=kky; ds laj{k.k ds v/hu lac¼ dk;kZy;ksa@Lok;r laxBuksa ds

laca/ esa uksMy vf/dkjh ds :i esa ukeksfn"V djrh gS vkSj og

bl ea=kky; ds laj{k.k ds v/hu tu izkf/dkfj;ksa }kjk dh xbZ lHkh

dkjZokb;ksa dk leUo;u Hkh djsaxs rFkk mDr vf/fu;e ds iz;kstukFkZ

dk;Z dj jgs dsUnzh; tu lwpuk vf/dkfj;ksa (lhihvkbZvks) rFkk

lgk;d dsUnzh; tu lwpuk vf/dkfj;ksa (lhihvkbZvks) dks ukeksfn"V

djus ds ckjs esa Je vkSj jkstxkj ea=kky; ds varxZr tu izkfèkdkfj;ksa

}kjk dh xbZ dkjZokb;ksa dk leUo; Hkh djsaxs A

2- uksMy vf/dkjh ds lkFk vkjVhvkbZ vkSj fof/d izdks"B]

lwpuk dk vf/dkj vf/fu;e] 2005 ds vUrxZr lHkh dsUnzh;

tu lwpuk vf/dkfj;ksa dh rjiQ ls vuqjks/ksa dks izkIr djus gsrq

izkf/dkfj;ksa ds lkFk dsUnzh; fcUnq gksaxs rFkk mUgsa lacaf/r tu lwpuk

vf/dkjh dks vxzsf"kr djsasxs A Je vkSj jkstxkj ea=kky; (eq[;

lfpoky;) ls lacaf/r lwpuk izkIr djus gsrq vuqjks/ /kjk 6 dh

mi&/kjk (1) ds varxZr mfpr jlhn ds ekè;e ls udn vFkok

osru ,oa ys[kk vf/dkjh (eq[; lfpoky;) Je ,oa jkstxkj

ea=kky; dks ns; fMekaM MªkÝV vFkok cSadlZ pSd vFkok Hkkjrh;

iksLVy vkMZj }kjk nl (10) #i;s ds vkosnu 'kqYd ds lkFk Hksts

tk,a A

3- MkW- vuwi pUn ik.Ms] la;qDr lfpo] Hkkjr ljdkj vxys

vkns'kksa rd Je ,oa jkstxkj ea=kky; ds laca/ eas lwpuk dk

vf/dkj vf/fu;e] 2005 dh /kjk 19(1) ds iz;kstukFkZ ofj"B

vf/dkjh jgsaxs A

4- ;g lfpo] Je ,oa jkstxkj ea=kky; ds vuqeksnu ls tkjh

fd;k tkrk gS A

¹la- tSM&20025@18@2005&iz'kk- Iº

iou dqekj] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 16th July, 2013

S.O. 1610.—In exercise of the powers conferred

under Section 5(1) read with Section 2(C) of the Right to

Information Act, 2005 (No. 22 of 2005) and in supersession

of Notification of even number date 11th January 2011,

the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour and

Employment designate Shri Chanan Ram, Director, Ministry

of Labour and Employment as Nodal Officer for the purpose

of Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect to this Ministry

and Attached offices/Autonomous organizations under

the aegis of this Ministry and will also co-ordinate all

actions taken up by the public authorites under the aegis

of this Ministry and will also coordinate all actions

taken up by the public authorities under the Ministry of

Labour and Employment regarding designating the CPIOs

and ACP IOs for carring out the purpose of the said act.

2. RTI & Legal cell along with Nodal Officer will be

the Central point with the authority to receive the requests

under the RTI Act, 2005 on behalf of all CPIOs and forward

the same to the cocerned CPIO. A request for obtaining

information pertaining to Ministry of Labour and

Employment (Main Sectt.) under section (1) of section 6

shall be accompanied by an application fee of Rupees ten

(10) by way of cash through proper receipt or by Demand

Draft of Bankers Cheque or Indian Postal Order payable to

PAO (MS), Ministry of Labour and Employment, Shram

Shakti, Rafi Marg, New Delhi-110001.

3. Dr. Anoop Chander Pandey, Joint Secretary to the

Government of India shall continue to be Senior Officer

for the purpose of section 19(1) of the Right to Information

Act, 2005 with respect to Ministry of Labour and

Employment till further orders.

4. This has the approval of Secretary, Ministry of

Labour and Employment.

[No. Z-20025/18/2005-Adm.I]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

4206

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 3, 2013/SRAVANA 12, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ubZ fnYyh] 23 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1611-—jk"Vªifr] lqJh ds- ih- izlUuk dqekjh] dks

17&7&2013 (iwokZg~u) ls dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd U;k;kf/dj.k&lg

Je U;k;ky;] psUubZ] ds ihBklhu vf/dkjh ds :i esa 11&09&2017

rd vFkok vxys vkns'kksa rd] tks Hkh igys gks] fu;qDr djrs gSa A

¹la- ,&11016@2@2012&lh,y,l&IIº

jkts'k dqekj] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 23rd July, 2013

S.O. 1611.—The President is pleased to appoint

Ms. K. P. Prasanna Kumari as Presiding Officer of the

Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,

Chennai w.e.f. 17-07-2013 (F.N.) for a period upto

11-09-2017 or until further orders, which is earlier.

[No. A-11016/2/2012-CLS-II]

RAJESH KUMAR, Under Secy.

ubZ fnYyh] 26 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1612-—tcfd eSllZ bafM;u ,DlIyksflOl fy-

¹dksM la[;k MCY;w ch@8217 ds varxZr ,lvkjvks gkoMk esaº

(,rnqijkUr izfr"Bku ds :i esa lan£Hkr) us deZpkjh Hkfo"; fuf/

,oa izdh.kZ mica/ vf/fu;e] 1962 (1962 dk 19) (,rnqijkUr

vf/fu;e ds :i esa lan£Hkr) dh /kjk 17 dh mi&/kjk (1) ds

[k.M (d) ds varxZr NwV ds fy, vkosnu fd;k gS A

2- vkSj tcfd dsUnzh; ljdkj ds fopkj esa] va'knku dh

njksa ds laca/ esa mDr izfr"Bku ds Hkfo"; fuf/ fu;e mDr

vf/fu;e dh /kjk 6 esa fofu£n"V fu;eksa dh rqyuk esa deZpkfj;ksa

ds fy, de mi;qDr ugha gaS vkSj deZpkjh mDr vf/fu;e vFkok

deZpkjh Hkfo"; fuf/ ;kstuk] 1952 (,rnqijkar ;kstuk ds :i esa

lan£Hkr)ds varxZr ln`'k Lo:i ds fdlh vU; izfr"Bku esa deZpkfj;ksa

ds laca/ esa nh tkus okyh vU; Hkfo"; fuf/ izlqfo/kvksa dk Hkh ykHk

mBk jgs gSa A

3- vr% dsUnzh; ljdkj] vc mDr vf/fu;e dh /kjk 17

dh mi&/kjk (1) ds [k.M (d) n~okjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx

djrs gq, bl laca/ esa le;&le; ij fofu£n"V 'krks± ds vè;/hu]

mDr izfr"Bku dks 1&5&1962 ls vxyh vf/lwpuk rd mDr

;kstuk ds lHkh mica/ksa ds izHkko ls NwV iznku djrh gS A

¹la- ,l&35015@16@2013&,l,l&IIº

lqHkk"k dqekj] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 26th July, 2013

S.O. 1612.—Whereas M/s. Indian Explosives Ltd.

[under Code No. WB/8217 in SRO, Howrah] (hereinafter

referred to as the establishment) has applied for exemption

under clause (a) of sub-section (1) of section 17 of the

Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions

Act, 1952 (19 of 1952 ) (hereinafter referred to as the Act).

2. And whereas in the opinion of the Central

Government, the rules of the provident fund of the said

establishment with respect to the rates of contribution are

not less favourable to employees therein than those

specified in section 6 of the said Act and the employees

are also in enjoyment of other provident fund benefits

provided under the said Act or under the Employees’

Provident Funds Scheme, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as

the Scheme) in relation to the employees in any other

establishment of similar character.

3. Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by clause (a) of sub-section (1) of section 17 of the said

Act and subject to the conditions specified in this regard

from time to time, the Central Government, hereby exempts

the said establishment from the operation of all the

provisions of the said Scheme with effect from 01-05-1962

until further notification.

[No. S-35015/16/2013-SS-II]

SUBHASH KUMAR, Under Secy.

Printed by the Manager, Government of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi-110064

and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi-110054.