x`g ea=kky;

(jktHkk"kk foHkkx)

ubZ fnYyh] 30 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1613-—jktHkk"kk (la?k ds 'kkldh; iz;kstuksa ds

fy, iz;ksx) fu;e 1976 ds fu;e 10(4) ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnz

ljdkj vYila[;d dk;Z ea=kky; dks ftlds 80 izfr'kr ls vf/d

vf/dkfj;ksa ,oa deZpkfj;ksa us fgUnh dk dk;Zlk/d Kku izkIr dj

fy;k gS] vf/lwfpr djrh gS A

¹la- 12022@2@2013&jk-zHkk-@dk&IIº

gfjUnz oqQekj] funs'kd (dk;kZUo;u)

MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS

(Department of Official Language)

New Delhi, the 30th July, 2013

S.O. 1613.—In pursuance of Rule 10 (4) of the

Official Language (Use for official purposes of the Union)

Rule 1976, the Central Government here notifies Ministry

of Minority Affairs where more than 80% staff has acquired

the working knowledge of Hindi.

[ No. 12022/2/2013-OL /Impl.II]

HARINDER KUMAR, Director (Implementation)

'kgjh fodkl ea=kky;

(laink funs'kky;)

ubZ fnYyh] 22 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1614-—dsUnzh; ljdkj] ljdkjh LFkku (vizkfèkÑr

vf/Hkksfx;ksa dh csn[kyh) vf/fu;e] 1971 (1971 dk 40) dh /

kjk 3 }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, vkSj Hkkjr ds jkti=k]

rkjh[k 12 ebZ] 1990 esa izdkf'kr vf/lwpuk la[;kad

dk-vk- 1377] rkjh[k 3] ebZ] 1990 ds vf/Øe.k esa] jkT; lHkk ds

lHkkifr ls ijke'kZ djus ds i'pkr~ uhps lkj.kh ds LraHk (1) esa

mfYyf[kr vf/dkfj;ksa dks] tks ljdkj ds jktif=kr vf/dkjh gSa]

mDr vf/fu;e ds iz;kstu ds fy, laink vf/dkjh fu;qDr djrh

gS tks mDr lkj.kh ds LraHk (2) esa dh rRLFkkuh izfof"V esa fofufn"V

ljdkjh LFkku ds laca/ esa mDr vf/fu;e }kjk ;k mlds v/hu

laink vf/dkfj;ksa dsk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx vkSj vf/jksfir

drZO;ksa dk ikyu djsaxs A

jftLVªh la- Mh- ,y- (,u) 04@0007@2003µ05

REGD. NO. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05

izkf/dkj ls izdkf'kr

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

lkIrkfgd

WEEKLY

la- 32]

ubZ fnYyh, vxLr 4—vxLr 10] 2013] '[email protected] 13—Jko.k 19] 1935

No. 32]

NEW DELHI, AUGUST 4—AUGUST 10, 2013, SATURDAY/SRAVANA 13—SRAVANA 19, 1935

Hkkx esa fHkUu i`"B la[;k nh tkrh gS ftlls fd ;g i`Fkd ladyu ds :i esa j[kk tk lds

Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

Hkkx II—[k.M 3—mi&[k.M (ii)

PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)

Hkkjr ljdkj ds ea=kky;ksa (j{kk ea=kky; dks NksM+dj) }kjk tkjh fd, x, lkafof/d vkns'k vkSj vf/lwpuk,a

Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India

(Other than the Ministry of Defence)

3303 GI/2013

(4207)

4208

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

lkj.kh

laink vf/dkjh

ljdkjh LFkku dk izoxZ

(1)

(2)

jkT; lHkk lfpoky;] ubZ

ljdkjh Fkku (vizkf/Ñr

fnYyh esa lnL; lq[k lqfo/k,a vf/Hkksfx;ksa dh csn[kyh)

vuqHkkx ds Hkkjlk/d mi funs'kd vf/fu;e] 1971 (1971 dk 40)

;k la;qDr funs'kd@lk/kj.k iz'kklu ds izkjaHk ls iwoZ ;k mlds i'pkr~

vuqHkkx ds Hkkjlk/d mifuns'kd lfpoky; ds deZpkfjao`n ds

;k la;qDr funs'kd A fdlh lnL; dks fuokl LFkku

iznku djus ds fy, dsUnzh;

ljdkj }kjk jkT; lHkk lfpoky;

ds fu;a=k.kk/hu j[ks x, ljdkj

LFkku A

¹iQk- la- 22012@2@2013&uhfrº

,l- ds- tSu] laink funs'kd (uhfr)

MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT

(Directorate of Estates)

New Delhi, the 22nd July, 2013

S.O. 1614.—In exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 3 of the Public Premises (Eviction of unauthorised

Occupants) Act, 1971, (40 of 1971) and in supersession of

the notification number S.O. 1377, dated 3rd May, 1990,

published vide Gazette of India dated 12th May, 1990,

the Central Government, after consultation with the

Chairman, Rajya Sabha, hereby appoints the officers

mentioned in column (1) of the Table below, being Gazetted

Officers of Government, to be the estate officers for the

purpose of the said Act, who shall exercise the powers

conferred and perform the duties imposed on estate

officers by or under the said Act in respect of the public

premises specified in the corresponding entry in column

(2) of the said Table.

TABLE

Estate officers

Category of Public Premises

(1)

(2)

Deputy Director or Joint

Public premises which have

Director in charge of

been placed by the Central

Members’ Amenities

Government under the control

Section/Deputy Director of the Rajya Sabha Secretariat

or Joint Director in charge for providing residential

of General Administration accommodation to any member

Section in the Rajya

of the staff of the Secretariat,

Sabha Secretariat,

either before or after the

New Delhi

commencement of the Public

Premises

(Eviction

of

Unauthorised

Occupants)

Act, 1971 (Act 40 of 1971)

[No. 22012/2/2013-Pol.I]

S.K. Jain, Dy. Director of Estates (Policy)

Ñf"k ea=kky;

(Ñf"k ,oa lgdkfjrk foHkkx)

(jktHkk"kk izHkkx)

ubZ fnYyh] 5 vxLr] 2013

dk-vk- 1615-—dsUnzh; ljdkj] jktHkk"kk (la?k ds 'kkldh;

iz;kstuksa ds fy, iz;ksx) fu;e] 1976 ds fu;e 10 ds mi fu;e

(4) ds vuqlj.k esa Ñf"k ea=kky;] Ñf"k ,oa lgdkfjrk foHkkx ds

varxZr fuEufyf[kr iz'kklfud fu;a=k.kk/hu Lok;Ùk fudk; dks

ftlds 80% deZpkjho`Un us fgUnh dk dk;Zlk/d Kku izkIr dj

fy;k gS] vf/lwfpr djrh gS A

jk"Vªh; Ñf"k foLrkj izca/ laLFkku]

jktsUnz uxj] gSnjkckn&500030

vk¡/z izns'k

¹la- 3&3@2011&jk-Hkk- uhfrº

vkj- ch- flUgk] la;qDr lfpo

MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE

(Department of Agriculture and Cooperation)

( Official Language Division)

New Delhi, the 5th August, 2013

S.O. 1615.—In pursuance of Sub-Rule (4) of the

Rule 10 of the Official Language (Use for Official Purposes

of the Union) Rules, 1976 the Central Government hereby

notifies the following Autonomous body which is under

the administrative control of the Department of the

Agriculture & Cooperation, Ministry of Agriculture,

whereof 80% staff have acquired the working knowledge

of Hindi—

National Institute of Agricultural Extension

Management, Rajendra Nagar, Hyderabad-500030.

[ No. 3-3/2011-Official Language Policy]

R. B. SINHA, Jt. Secy.

(1)

(2)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4209

fo|qr ea=kky;

ubZ fnYyh] 29 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1616-—17&8&2006 dks vf/lwfpr eq[; oS|qr fujh{kd vkSj oS|qr fujh{kd dh vgZrk] 'kfDr vkSj dk;Z fu;ekoyh] 2006

ds lkFk ifBr fo|qr vf/fu;e] 2003 (2003 dk 36) dh /kjk 162 dh mi&/kjk (1) ds }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, dsUnz

ljdkj ,rnn~okjk Mhth,e,l ds fuEufyf[kr vf/dkfj;ksa dks bl vf/lwpuk dh rkjh[k ls Mhth,e,l esa muds dk;Zdky rd] mi;qZDr

fu;e esa mfYyf[kr vgZrk vkSj 'krZ dks iwjk djus ds v/hu [kku lqj{kk egkfuns'kky; ds fy, oS|qRk fujh{kd ds :i esa fu;qDRk djrh gS%—

Øe

uke

vgZrk

Mhth,e,l eas

ds :i esa fu;qDr

dk;ZHkkj xzg.k

la-

inuke

fd;k tkuk gS

djus dh frfFk

1

vkuUn vxzoky

oS|qRk vfHk;kaf=kdh

mi funs'kd

oS|qr fujh{kd

26&03&2012

fMxzh

[kku lqj{kk (oS|qr)

2

iqÙkkjktq lkgwdsg

&ogh&

&ogh&

&ogh&

27&03&2012

3

izdk'k oqQekj

&ogh&

&ogh&

&ogh&

26&03&2012

4

jke oqQekj

&ogh&

&ogh&

&ogh&

23&04&2012

5

pØikf.k

&ogh&

&ogh&

&ogh&

21&02&2012

ikykuheykbZ

6

fc'oukFk csgjk

&ogh&

&ogh&

&ogh&

30&01&2012

mi;qZDr mfYyf[kr vf/dkjh dsUnzh; fo|qr izkf/dj.k (lqj{kk vkSj fo|qr vkiw£r ls lacaf/r mik;) fofu;e] 2010 esa nh xbZ izfØ;k ds

vuqlkj] Mhth,e,l ds vf/dkj okys {ks=kksa esa izpkyuk/hu fo|qr dk;ks± fo|qr laLFkkiukvksa rFkk fo|qr jks¯yx LVkWd vFkok Mhth,e,l ds

fu;a=k.kk/hu@Mhth,e,l ls lacaf/r dk;ks± rFkk fo|qr laLFkkiukvksa ds laca/ esa vf/dkjksa dk iz;ksx djsaxs vkSj viuk dk;Z fu"ikfnr djsaxs vkSj

tEew ,oa d'ehj jkT; dks NksM+dj] visu lacaf/r dk;Z{ks=k dh LFkkuh; lhekvksa esa [kku ls lacaf/r fo|qr fujh{kd ds :i esa Hkh vius

vfèkdkjksa dk iz;ksx djasxs vkSj dk;Z djsaxs A

Mhth,e,l ;g lqfuf'pr djsxk fd mDr vf/dkjh mUgsa] Mhth,e,l esa mi funs'kd] [kku lqj{kk (fo|qr) ds :i esa fn;s x;s

dk;ks± ds laca/ esa og fo|qr fujh{kd ugha gksaxs A

fo|qr fujh{kd ds :i esa fu;qDr vf/dkjh og izf'k{k.k ysaxs ftls dsUnz ljdkj bl mís'; ds fy, vko';d le>s rFkk ,slk

izf'k{k.k ljdkj dh larqf"V ds Lrj rd iwjk fd;k tk,xk A

¹ iQk- la- 42@3@2013&vkj ,.M vkjº

T;ksfr vjksM+k] la;qDrk lfpo

MINISTRY OF POWER

New Delhi, the 29th July, 2013

S.O. 1616.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 162 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (36 of

2003) read with Qualification, Power and Function of Chief Electrical Inspector and Electrical Inspectors Rules, 2006

notified on 17.8.2006, the Central Government hereby appoints the following officers of DGMS, as Electrical Inspector for

Directorate General of Mine Safety, from the date of this Notification till his tenure in DGMS subject to fulfillment of the

qualification and condition mentionedoin the above Rule:—

4210

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

oL=k ea=kky;

ubZ fnYyh] 2 vxLr] 2013

dk-vk- 1617-—dsUnzh; ljdkj] la?k ds 'kkldh; iz;kstuksa

ds fy, jktHkk"kk fu;e] 1976 ds fu;e 10 ds mi fu;e 4 ds

vuqlj.k esa] oL=k ea=kky; ds varxZr vkus okys fuEufyf[kr

dk;kZy;ksa dks ftlesa 80% ls vf/d deZpkfj;ksa us fgUnh dk

dk;Zlk/d Kku izkIr dj fy;k gS] vf/lwfpr djrh gS %

1- vuqla/ku izlkj dsanz] dsjsvoizla] dsanzh; js'ke cksMZ]

ekiZQr&mifuns'kd] js'ke fodkl foHkkx] dE;qfuVh gsYFk

lsaVj] NqVeyiqj&247662 ftyk lgkjuiqj] mRrj izns'k A

2- vuqla/ku izlkj dsanz] & mi bdkbZ] dsjsvoizla] dsanzh;

js'ke cksMZ] lsDVj&21] iapdwyk&134112] gfj;k.kk A

¹la- bZ&11016@1@2011&¯gnhº

lqu;uk rksej] la;qDr lfpo

MINISTRY OF TEXTILES

New Delhi, the 2nd August, 2013

S.O. 1617.—In pursuance of Sub-Rule (4) of Rule

10 of the Official Languages (use for official purpose of

the Union) Rules, 1976 the Central Government hereby

notifies the following offices of the Ministry of Textiles,

more than 80% staff whereof have acquired the working

knowledge of Hindi.

1. Research Extension Centre, CSRTI, Central Silk

Board, C/o-Dy. Director, Resham Vikash Vibhag,

Community Health Centre, Chutmalpur-247662 Dist.

Saharanpur, Uttar Pradesh.

2. Research Extension Centre -Sub Unit, CSRTI,

Central Silk Board, Sector-21, Panchkula-134112,

Haryana.

[ No. E-11016/1/2011-Hindi]

SUNAINA TOMAR, Jt. Secy.

S. No.

Name

Qualification

Designation

To be

Date

of

in DGMS

Appointed as

Joining

1.

Anand

Degree in

Dy. Director

Electrical

26.03.2012

Agarwal

Electrical

of Mine

Inspector

Engineering

Safety (Elect.)

2.

Puttaraju

-do-

-do-

-do

27.01.2012

Sahukaiah

3.

Prakash

-do-

-do-

-do-

26.03.2012

Kumar

4.

Raj Kumar

-do-

-do-

-do-

23.04.2012

5.

Chakkarapani

-do-

-do-

-do-

21.02.2012

Palanimalai

6.

Bishwanath

-do-

-do-

-do-

30.01.2012

Behera

The above mentioned officer shall exercise the powers and perform his functions in respect of electrical works, electrical

installations and electrical rolling stock in operation within the areas occupied by the DGMS or in respect of works and

electrical installations under the control of DGMS/belonging to DGMS and shall also exercise the powers and perform

function as electrical inspector in relation to a mine, within the local limits of their respective jurisdiction except the State

of Jammu & Kashmir, as per the procedure provided in Central Electricity Authority (Measures relating to Safety and

Electricity Supply) Regulations, 2010.

DGMS will ensure that above said official shall not be the Electirical Inspector in respect of the work assigned to him as

Dy. Director of Mine Sefety (Elect.) in DGMS.

The Officials , appointed as Electrical Inspector shall undergo such training as the Central Govenrment may consider

necessary for the purpose and such training shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Government.

[F. No. 42/3/2013-R &R ]

JYOTI ARORA, Jt. Secy.

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4211

miHkksDrk ekeys] [kk| vkSj lkoZtfud forj.k ea=kky;

(miHkksDrk ekeys foHkkx)

(Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks)

ubZ fnYyh] 30 twu] 2013

dk-vk- 1618-—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks fu;e] 1987 ds fu;e 7 ds mi&fu;e (1) ds [kaM ([k) ds vuqlj.k esa

Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks ,rn~}kjk vf/lwfpr djrk gS fd uhps vuqlwph esa fn, x, ekud (dks) esas la'kks/u fd;k x;k@fd;s x;s gSa A

vuqlwph

Øe la- la'kksf/r Hkkjrh; ekud (dksa) dh

la'kks/u dh la[;k

LFkkfir frfFk

la[;k] o"kZ vkSj 'kh"kZd

vkSj frfFk

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

1-

vkbZ ,l 4955% 2001 ?kjsyw /qykbZ ds

la'kks/u la[;k 3]

30 twu] 2013

fy, viektZd ikmMj&fof'kf"V

twu] 2013

(pkSFkk iqujh{k.k)

bu Hkkjrh; ekudksa dh izfr;k¡ Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks] ekud Hkou] 9] cgknqj 'kkg t+iQj ekxZ] ubZ fnYyh&110002] {ks=kh;

dk;kZy;ksa % ubZ fnYyh] dksydkrk] p.Mhx<+] psUubZ] eqEcbZ rFkk 'kk[kk dk;kZy;ksa % vgenkckn] caxykSj] Hkksiky] Hkqous'oj] dks;Ecrwj]

xqokgkVh] gSnjkckn] t;iqj] dkuiqj] ukxiqj] iVuk] iw.ks rFkk fr:ouUrkiqje esa fcØh gsrq miyC/ gSa A Hkkjrh; ekudksa dks

http://www.standardsbis.in }kjk baVjusV ij [kjhnk tk ldrk gS A

¹lanHkZ lh,pMh 25@vkbZ,l 4955º

MkW- jktho ds- >k] oSKkfud ^,iQ* ,oa izeq[k (jlk;u)

MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

(Department of Consumer Affairs)

(BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS)

New Delhi, the 30th June, 2013

S.O. 1618.—In pursuance of clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987,

the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards, particulars of which are given

in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued :

SCHEDULE

Sl.No.

No. and Year of the

No. and year of the

Date from which

Indian Standards

amendment

the amendment

shall have effect

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

1.

IS 4955 : 2001 Household

Amendment No. 3

30th June, 2013

laundry detergent powder -

June, 2013

specification ( Fourth Revision)

Copy of this Standards is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan, 9, Bahadur

Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi- 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi, Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chennai, Mumbai and

also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati, Hyderabad, Jaipur,

Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna, Pune, Thiruvananthapuram. On line purchase of Indian standard can be made

at :http://www.standardsbis.in

[Ref. CHD 25 /IS 4955]

Dr. RAJIV K. JHA, Scientist ‘F’ & Head (CHD)

4212

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ubZ fnYyh] 31 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1619-—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks fu;e] 1987 ds fu;e 7 ds mi&fu;e (1) ds [kaM ([k) ds vuqlj.k esa

Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks ,rn~}kjk vf/lwfpr djrk gS fd uhps vuqlwph esa fn, x, ekud (dks) esas la'kks/u fd;k x;k@fd;s x;s gSa A

vuqlwph

Øe la- la'kksf/r Hkkjrh; ekud (dksa) dh

la'kks/u dh la[;k

LFkkfir frfFk

la[;k] o"kZ vkSj 'kh"kZd

vkSj frfFk

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

1-

vkbZ ,l 133% 2004 busey] Hkhrjh% (d)

la'kks/u la[;k ua- 1]

31 tqykbZ] 2013

v/ysiu ([k) ifjlTtk fof'kf"V

tqykbZ] 2013

(pkSFkk iqujh{k.k)

bu Hkkjrh; ekudksa dh izfr;k¡ Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks] ekud Hkou] 9] cgknqj 'kkg t+iQj ekxZ] ubZ fnYyh&110002] {ks=kh;

dk;kZy;ksa % ubZ fnYyh] dksydkrk] p.Mhx<+] psUubZ] eqEcbZ rFkk 'kk[kk dk;kZy;ksa % vgenkckn] caxykSj] Hkksiky] Hkqous'oj] dks;Ecrwj]

xqokgkVh] gSnjkckn] t;iqj] dkuiqj] ukxiqj] iVuk] iw.ks rFkk fr:ouUrkiqje esa fcØh gsrq miyC/ gSa A Hkkjrh; ekudksa dks

http://www.standardsbis.in }kjk baVjusV ij [kjhnk tk ldrk gS A

¹lanHkZ lh,pMh 20@vkbZ,l 133º

MkW- jktho ds- >k] oSKkfud ^,iQ* ,oa izeq[k (jlk;u)

New Delhi, the 31st July, 2013

S.O. 1619.—In pursuance of clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987,

the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards, particulars of which are given

in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued :

SCHEDULE

Sl.No.

No. and Year of the

No. and year of the

Date from which

Indian Standards

amendment

the amendment

shall have effect

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

1.

IS 133 : 2004 Enamel, interior

Amendment No. 1

31 July, 2013

(a) Undercoating (b) Finishing

July, 2013

specification ( Fourth Revision)

Copy of this Standards is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan, 9, Bahadur

Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi- 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi, Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chennai, Mumbai and

also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati, Hyderabad, Jaipur,

Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna, Pune, Thiruvananthapuram. On line purchase of Indian standard can be made

at :http://www.standardsbis.in

[Ref. CHD 20/IS 133]

Dr. RAJIV K. JHA, Scientist ‘F’ & Head (CHD)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4213

ubZ fnYyh] 31 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1620-—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks fu;e] 1987 ds fu;e 7 ds mi&fu;e (1) ds [kaM ([k) ds vuqlj.k esa

Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks ,rn~}kjk vf/lwfpr djrk gS fd uhps vuqlwph esa fn, x, ekud (dksa) esas la'kks/u fd;k x;k@fd;s x;s gSa A

vuqlwph

Øe la- la'kksf/r Hkkjrh; ekud (dksa) dh

la'kks/u dh la[;k

LFkkfir frfFk

la[;k] o"kZ vkSj 'kh"kZd

vkSj frfFk

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

1-

vkbZ ,l 101 (Hkkx 5@vuqHkkx 2)% 1988

la'kks/u la[;k 4]

31 tqykbZ] 2013

jax jksxu] okfuZ'k vkSj lacaf/r mRiknksa ds

tqykbZ] 2013

fy, uewuk vkSj ijh{k.k ds rjhds Hkkx 5

;kaf=kd ijh{k.k vuqHkkx 2 yphykiu vkSj

vklatu (rhljk iqujh{k.k)

bu Hkkjrh; ekudksa dh izfr;k¡ Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks] ekud Hkou] 9] cgknqj 'kkg t+iQj ekxZ] ubZ fnYyh&110002] {ks=kh;

dk;kZy;ksa % ubZ fnYyh] dksydkrk] p.Mhx<+] psUubZ] eqEcbZ rFkk 'kk[kk dk;kZy;ksa % vgenkckn] caxykSj] Hkksiky] Hkqous'oj] dks;Ecrwj]

xqokgkVh] gSnjkckn] t;iqj] dkuiqj] ukxiqj] iVuk] iw.ks rFkk fr:ouUrkiqje esa fcØh gsrq miyC/ gSa A Hkkjrh; ekudksa dks

http://www.standardsbis.in }kjk baVjusV ij [kjhnk tk ldrk gS A

¹lanHkZ lh,pMh 20@vkbZ,l 101(Hkkx 5@vuqHkkx 2)º

MkW- jktho ds- >k] oSKkfud ^,iQ* ,oa izeq[k (jlk;u)

New Delhi, the 31st July, 2013

S.O. 1620.—In pursuance of clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987, the

Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards, particulars of which are given in the

Schedule hereto annexed have been issued :

SCHEDULE

Sl.No.

No. and Year of the

No. and year of the

Date from which

Indian Standards

amendment

the amendment

shall have effect

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

1.

IS 101(Part 5/Sec 2) : 1988

Amendment No. 4

31 July, 2013

Methods of sampling and test

July, 2013

for paints, varnishes and related

products Part 5 Mechanical

Tests Section 2 Flexibility and

Adhesion ( Third Revision)

Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan, 9, Bahadur

Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi- 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi, Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chennai, Mumbai and

also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati, Hyderabad, Jaipur,

Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna, Pune, Thiruvananthapuram. On line purchase of Indian standard can be made

at :http://www.standardsbis.in

[Ref. CHD 20 /IS 101(Part 5/Sec 2)]

Dr. RAJIV K. JHA, Scientist ‘F’ & Head (CHD)

4214

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ubZ fnYyh] 1 vxLr] 2013

dk-vk- 1621-—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks fu;e] 1987 ds fu;e 7 ds mi&fu;e (1) ds [kaM ([k) ds vuqlj.k esa

Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks ,rn~}kjk vf/lwfpr djrk gS fd ftl Hkkjrh; ekudksa dk fooj.k uhPks vuqlwph esa fn;k x;k gS os LFkkfir gks x;s gSa A

vuqlwph

Øe la- LFkkfir Hkkjrh; ekud (dksa) dh

u;s Hkkjrh; ekud }kjk

LFkkfir frfFk

la[;k] o"kZ vkSj 'kh"kZd

vfrdzfer Hkkjrh; ekud

vFkok ekudksa] ;fn dksbZ gks]

dh la[;k vkSj o"kZ

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

1-

vkbZ ,l 15967 (Hkkx 1)% 2013

&

01 vxLr] 2013

ufydkdkj izfrnhfIr ySEiksa ds fy,

la/kfj=k Hkkx 1 lqj{kk visa{kk,W

bl Hkkjrh; ekud dh izfr;k¡ Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks] ekud Hkou] 9] cgknqj 'kkg t+iQj ekxZ] ubZ fnYyh&110002] {ks=kh;

dk;kZy;ksa % ubZ fnYyh] dksydkrk] p.Mhx<+] psUubZ] eqEcbZ rFkk 'kk[kk dk;kZy;ksa % vgenkckn] caxykSj] Hkksiky] Hkqous'oj] dks;Ecrwj]

xqokgkVh] gSnjkckn] t;iqj] dkuiqj] ukxiqj] iVuk] iw.ks rFkk fr:ouUrkiqje esa fcØh gsrq miyC/ gSa A

¹lanHkZ bZVh 23@Vh&90º

vkj- lh- esFk~;w oSKkfud ^,iQ* ,oa izeq[k (fo|qr rduhdh)

New Delhi, the 1st August, 2013

S.O. 1621.—In pursuance of clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987,

the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards, particulars of which are given in the Schedule

hereto annexed have been issued :

SCHEDULE

Sl. No.

No. and Year of the

No. and year of the

Date of Established

Indian Standards

Indian Standards, if

any, Superseded by

the New Indian Standard

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

1.

IS 15967 (Part 1) : 2013

-

01 August, 2013

Capacitors for use in tubular fluorescent

and other discharge lamp

circuits part 1 safety

reqirements

Copies of this Standard are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan, 9, Bahadur

Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi- 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi, Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chennai, Mumbai and

also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati, Hyderabad, Jaipur,

Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna, Pune,Thiruvananthapuram.

[Ref. ET 23/T-90]

R. C. MATHEW, Scientist ‘F’ & Head (Electro tenchnical)

isVªksfy;e vkSj izkÑfrd xSl ea=ky;

ubZ fnYyh] 5 vxLr] 2013

dk-vk- 1622-—dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slk izrhr gksrk gS fd yksd fgr esa ;g vko';d gS fd floku ls cSrkyiqj rd

isVªksfy;e inkFkksZ ds ifjogu gsrq rglhy% n¢ofj¸kk] ftyk% n¢ofj¸kk] jkT;% mŸkj çn¢'k esa bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM }kjk

ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkuh pkfg, A

vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slh ikbiykbu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, vko';d izrhr gksrk gS fd ml Hkwfe esa ftlds Hkhrj

mDr ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkus dk izLrko gS vkSj tks bl vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa of.kZr gS] mi;ksx dk vtZu fd;k tk,(

vr% vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] iSVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbUl ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½ vf/kfu;e] 1962 ¼1962

dk 50½ dh /kkjk 3 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] mDr Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/akdkj dk vtZu djus ds

vius vk'k; dh ?kks’k.kk djrh gS A

dksbZ O;fDr] tks mDr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa fgrc) gS] ml rkjh[k ls ftldks] Hkkjr ds jkti= esa ;Fkk izdkf'kr bl

vf/klwpuk dh izfr;ka lk/kkj.k turk dks miyC/k djk nh tkrh gS] bDdhl fnu ds vUnj] Hkwfe ds Hkhrj ikbiykbu fcNk, tkus gsrq

mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj ds vtZu ds fy,] Jh mekdkar f«kikBh] o l{ke izkf/kdkjh bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM] ¼ikbiykbu

fMohtu½] lqcsnkjxat] iks-vks% ihiyxkWao] ftyk% bykgkckn] fiu% 211012] jkT;% mŸkj izns'k dks fyf[kr :i eas vk{ksi Hkst ldsxkA

vuqlwph

rglhy % nsofj;k

jkT; % mÙkj izns'k

ekStk@xzke

losZ@Cykd@la- @IyksV (la-)

lc&Mho&la-

{ks=Qy

gsDVs;j

vkjs

oxZ ehVj

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

dqlekSuh

203

00

00

36

rIik % dNqokj

187

00

15

95

186

00

12

71

185

00

08

87

184¼pdjksM½

00

00

63

182

00

14

70

cjwvkMhg

450¼pdjksM½

00

00

62

rIik % dNqokj

443

00

09

45

444

00

00

36

440

00

00

36

445 c

00

14

95

445 v

00

08

17

432¼pdjksM½

00

02

05

433 c

00

05

31

433 v

00

00

36

431

00

06

49

430

00

05

69

376¼pdjksM½

00

00

61

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4215

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4216

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

308

00

09

48

306 c

00

00

54

306 v

00

13

38

305

00

15

03

304

00

07

94

319

00

00

36

299

00

01

12

301

00

02

04

300

00

08

85

291

00

00

36

290¼ugj½

00

00

64

289

00

14

87

288 v

00

00

36

288 c

00

00

36

286

00

02

36

285

00

00

70

284

00

00

36

287

00

00

04

drkSjk [ktwjh

640

00

00

34

rIik % lkFkh;ko

639

00

01

58

636

00

02

21

637

00

00

36

635

00

00

36

634

00

00

36

608

00

13

74

607

00

07

13

602

00

01

19

632

00

00

36

631

00

00

36

610

00

00

42

609

00

03

41

606

00

01

19

605

00

05

95

596

00

00

28

593

00

00

36

604

00

01

86

603

00

00

36

597

00

02

72

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4217

598

00

00

36

590

00

02

20

589

00

00

36

591

00

03

44

592

00

00

24

583

00

00

36

588

00

03

33

584

00

01

49

587

00

01

22

585

00

05

39

586

00

14

61

572

00

03

39

571¼pdjksM½

00

00

61

569

00

00

36

568

00

05

65

567

00

20

69

566¼pdjksM½

00

00

65

561

00

16

37

559

00

05

11

557¼pdjksM½

00

01

82

558

00

00

36

jkmriqj

552

00

00

36

rIik % dNqokj

551c

00

02

42

550

00

04

59

549

00

04

55

548

00

08

57

547c

00

03

15

547v

00

10

94

544¼pdjksM½

00

00

90

539

00

19

36

538

00

06

71

526

00

13

28

525

00

05

76

536

00

00

36

534

00

00

36

522

00

02

55

527¼pdjksM½

00

00

91

521

00

00

36

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4218

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

529

00

07

26

528v

00

13

00

528c

00

03

85

516¼pdjksM½

00

00

63

510

00

09

18

509¼pdjksM½

00

01

11

508

00

16

25

504v

00

13

14

502¼pdjksM½

00

00

83

457

00

19

30

456

00

21

06

455

00

00

36

459¼pdjksM½

00

01

53

460

00

14

85

431

00

20

88

426¼pdjksM½

00

00

72

425

00

12

55

422

00

02

48

423

00

04

32

421

00

02

47

424

00

00

36

420

00

23

04

419¼pdjksM½

00

00

63

418¼ugj½

00

04

86

415

00

19

44

cjkMhg

45

00

22

00

rIik % dNqokj

46

00

04

25

48

00

00

38

47

00

05

40

21¼pdjksM½

00

01

89

18

00

00

63

15

00

18

63

16

00

20

07

14

00

00

44

pd cUnh mQZ eBhvk

rIik % dNqokj

79

00

00

62

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4219

78

00

07

38

77

00

09

23

76

00

13

18

75

00

04

46

26

00

00

36

35¼pdjksM½

00

01

08

31c

00

06

72

31v

00

01

20

32

00

07

29

33

00

16

61

34¼pdjksM½

00

00

36

11c

00

00

36

12c

00

00

43

12v

00

14

58

10

00

00

40

9

00

06

37

8

00

05

98

7

00

00

60

1¼pdjksM½

00

00

90

ejhikj cq>qxZ

129¼jkLrk½

00

01

22

rIik % dNqokj

132

00

08

51

131

00

04

72

134

00

10

19

130

00

00

36

135

00

00

36

136

00

07

51

137

00

18

90

140

00

06

23

141¼pdjksM½

00

00

90

142

00

05

61

144

00

09

00

145

00

05

58

146

00

02

70

110

00

16

65

111¼pdjksM½

00

00

36

109

00

05

94

105¼jkLrk½

00

00

63

35

00

07

56

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4220

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

34

00

09

00

33

00

06

84

32

00

06

39

38¼pdjksM½

00

00

63

18

00

01

84

20

00

00

36

17

00

27

03

nqckSyh

160¼pdjksM½

00

00

72

rIik % dNqokj

159

00

00

38

158

00

09

52

157v

00

07

92

155

00

02

34

153

00

05

46

154

00

01

97

151¼pdjksM½

00

00

63

150

00

06

37

123c

00

11

66

123v

00

05

31

125

00

00

40

124

00

15

57

122¼pdjksM½

00

00

63

106c

00

26

73

107

00

00

36

110

00

00

36

66¼pdjksM½

00

01

62

65

00

10

13

64

00

06

93

63

00

07

16

1¼jkLrk½

00

01

17

ljS;k

218¼jkLrk½

00

01

50

rIik % dNqokj

224c

00

00

51

224v

00

03

31

222

00

12

78

221

00

04

98

223c

00

06

08

220

00

10

69

209v

00

00

36

212

00

01

83

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4221

213

00

10

71

139¼jkLrk½

00

00

71

128

00

22

64

130

00

05

00

131

00

00

36

95¼jkLrk½

00

00

57

98

00

04

13

96¼pdjksM½

00

01

13

88

00

18

21

83c

00

05

21

81¼pdjksM½

00

01

53

75

00

01

62

76c

00

04

30

76v

00

04

41

78c

00

09

48

78v

00

09

48

74

00

02

50

79

00

07

82

69

00

05

93

67v

00

02

89

66v

00

02

17

nsofj;k ehj

158c

00

00

36

rIik % dNqokj

158v

00

07

38

1 ukyk

00

01

08

11

00

07

02

12

00

03

10

9

00

07

92

7

00

01

26

6

00

05

94

4

00

03

42

5

00

00

36

3

00

02

88

2v

00

00

36

pdjok ?kwl

367

00

17

86

rIik % dNqokj

360

00

05

04

361

00

04

25

362

00

00

36

353

00

08

40

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4222

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

352v

00

13

50

351

00

00

36

349 ¼pd jksM½

00

00

72

348

00

09

36

347c

00

04

77

347v

00

05

13

344

00

10

44

342 ¼pd jksM½

00

00

68

341

00

13

50

340

00

00

36

338 ¼pd jksM½

00

00

63

336v

00

08

10

337v

00

00

36

330

00

14

94

328c

00

01

08

328v

00

03

96

327

00

01

26

326c

00

04

86

325

00

08

10

266 ¼jksM½

00

01

26

319

00

00

36

265

00

03

24

260

00

05

76

259 ¼pd jksM½

00

00

63

258

00

00

54

256

00

12

96

255

00

14

94

ukyk

00

01

53

iMjh

73

00

00

36

rIik % dNqokj

72

00

01

35

60

00

00

81

/kVsyk xkWth

442¼ukyk½

00

02

34

rIik % dNqokj

509

00

01

36

508

00

01

84

507

00

05

22

506

00

02

61

505

00

05

76

481

00

02

18

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4223

480

00

00

36

504

00

00

72

467

00

00

63

502

00

08

28

482

00

00

36

503

00

00

36

477

00

13

14

474

00

01

80

476

00

01

54

475

00

07

02

458¼pdjksM½

00

00

90

459

00

06

68

460

00

06

70

461

00

03

78

455

00

13

32

462

00

00

33

453¼pdjksM½

00

01

98

454

00

00

36

452

00

07

13

402¼jkLrk½

00

02

63

280

00

14

22

277

00

05

71

285

00

09

54

283

00

00

54

284

00

00

36

288

00

14

02

287

00

00

55

290¼pdjksM½

00

00

90

300

00

09

50

309

00

00

36

291

00

00

36

293

00

09

72

295

00

00

39

294

00

05

22

386

00

00

36

313¼pdjksM½

00

00

54

314

00

01

00

327¼jkLrk½

00

01

26

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4224

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

385¼pdjksM½

00

00

36

384

00

08

46

383

00

07

56

382

00

11

88

380

00

00

36

379

00

11

52

378

00

04

05

355¼pdjksM½

00

01

62

343

00

15

16

345

00

05

00

344

00

05

58

140

00

00

72

cMgjk

572

00

27

59

rIik % dNqokj

549

00

02

34

548

00

00

72

547

00

02

16

546

00

09

54

545

00

00

72

540

00

13

59

541

00

00

36

542

00

00

36

539

00

07

56

538

00

00

36

166

00

09

00

164

00

07

47

156

00

00

36

157

00

05

04

155

00

00

74

158

00

10

67

160

00

05

76

159

00

05

22

161

00

00

36

jkLrk

00

04

14

143

00

15

84

142

00

03

32

141

00

05

40

140

00

09

51

135 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

54

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4225

128

00

06

55

127

00

10

26

123

00

00

63

108

00

01

34

107 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

72

106

00

19

26

105

00

00

81

102 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

54

108

00

03

25

101

00

06

48

ixjk mQZ ijfl;k

256

00

11

16

rIik % dNqokj

255¼pdjksM½

00

00

72

235

00

10

44

234

00

02

09

236

00

09

18

237

00

08

46

232

00

00

30

238¼jkLrk½

00

02

05

242

00

04

86

240

00

11

43

241

00

13

68

212¼pdjksM½

00

00

72

166

00

06

03

167

00

00

36

165

00

10

80

164

00

01

56

163

00

13

22

155

00

00

54

jkeiwj

207

00

01

45

rIik % dNqokj

206 c

00

03

65

206 v

00

14

84

205¼pdjksM½

00

00

66

200c

00

02

25

199

00

36

48

183

00

00

36

202¼pdjksM½

00

00

65

203

00

03

91

192¼pdjksM½

00

01

24

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4226

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

182v

00

07

90

182c

00

00

36

180¼pdjksM½

00

00

71

178v

00

02

50

178c

00

00

36

85

00

00

36

84

00

24

09

83

00

01

52

119c

00

00

77

82

00

00

20

81

00

00

36

77

00

00

56

dwlegk mQZ csyok

180c

00

04

54

rIik % dNqokj

180v

00

10

21

179

00

03

93

182v

00

24

93

182c

00

00

20

178 ¼ugj½

00

01

25

177¼jkLrk½

00

00

46

176

00

09

74

169¼pdjksM½

00

00

72

167

00

13

39

166¼pdjksM½

00

01

08

146

00

06

00

147

00

10

93

148

00

12

83

150

00

06

88

149

00

00

36

143¼pdjksM½

00

00

87

142

00

14

06

138

00

01

83

131¼pdjksM½

00

00

19

133

00

00

36

137v

00

06

62

139

00

00

50

137c

00

12

81

136¼pdjksM½

00

00

70

23

00

08

84

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4227

22

00

13

28

20

00

02

40

19

00

02

05

1 ¼ukyk½

00

02

22

/kukSrh [kqnZ

177¼ukyk½

00

01

29

rIik % xkSojk;

176¼ukyk½

00

01

75

174

00

03

82

169

00

06

34

168

00

08

41

167

00

07

06

165¼pdjksM½

00

00

97

164

00

06

78

163¼pdjksM½

00

01

13

162

00

08

85

161¼pdjksM½

00

00

64

160

00

08

74

155

00

02

31

126¼pdjksM½

00

00

74

91

00

01

71

90

00

00

36

92

00

16

94

86

00

04

81

93¼pdjksM½

00

02

58

125

00

01

72

82

00

32

47

81

00

22

17

34¼pdjksM½

00

02

12

7

00

18

75

12

00

00

18

11

00

19

11

8

00

00

36

9

00

01

26

10

00

08

85

25¼pdjksM½

00

01

05

eqUnsjk

25

00

05

63

rIik % xkSojk;

23

00

04

42

22

00

10

78

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4228

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

21c

00

02

08

21v

00

10

01

20¼pdjksM½

00

00

74

19c

00

00

91

19v

00

07

91

18v

00

03

26

18c

00

03

18

17 ¼jksM½

00

01

29

16c

00

12

56

16v

00

02

80

15v

00

09

21

10

00

05

33

9¼pdjksM½

00

00

61

8c

00

07

82

8v

00

00

66

7

00

05

88

iks[kj HkhaMk

173

00

00

36

rIik % xkSojk;

73

00

00

36

72

00

10

62

71

00

00

36

68

00

00

36

50-c

00

02

55

49

00

02

95

48

00

06

28

45

00

00

48

46

00

05

85

47

00

05

85

HkxkSrhiqj

72v

00

01

13

rIik % xkSojk;

72c

00

07

87

71c

00

05

22

77

00

02

52

78

00

11

34

79

00

06

43

81

00

00

36

80

00

07

47

83c

00

05

83

97¼pdjksM½

00

01

08

111

00

00

36

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4229

110

00

00

69

99

00

12

07

100

00

00

76

109c

00

00

46

101

00

04

32

106v

00

04

14

107

00

04

68

108¼pdjksM½

00

00

90

cjkjh

99

00

13

90

rIik % xkSojk;

102

00

04

32

103¼pdjksM½

00

00

63

104

00

26

82

106

00

00

36

105

00

00

36

108

00

10

57

91¼jkLrk½

00

04

75

51

00

13

23

49

00

00

36

52

00

01

75

68

00

04

83

53

00

04

23

60

00

00

36

62

00

18

54

67

00

00

36

42

00

01

05

63

00

05

22

64

00

00

51

17¼dsuky½

00

05

22

16

00

00

51

15

00

00

36

13

00

04

10

Hkheiqj

580¼ugj½

00

01

08

rIik % xkSojk;

452

00

06

88

451

00

02

34

450

00

01

01

449

00

17

06

448¼jkLrk½

00

01

80

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4230

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

xkSjk [kkl

1084

00

33

21

rIik % xksjk

1076¼pdjksM½

00

00

63

1075¼pdjksM½

00

00

76

1055

00

19

01

1058

00

00

36

1057

00

00

40

1056

00

06

41

1043

00

16

83

1042

00

00

63

1038

00

04

86

1061

00

00

36

1037

00

03

83

1029

00

00

36

1059

00

01

58

1060

00

06

03

1032¼pdjksM½

00

00

63

1061

00

00

36

1031¼pdjksM½

00

00

63

1017

00

00

36

1016

00

07

47

1026

00

00

36

1014&1102¼pdjksM½

00

00

63

1015

00

30

96

1013

00

22

50

1018¼pdjksM½

00

00

63

320¼pdjksM½

00

00

63

315

00

33

12

314¼ugj½

00

01

35

313

00

10

08

226¼pdjksM½

00

01

44

311

00

00

36

310

00

00

36

225¼pdjksM½

00

01

44

210

00

12

78

212

00

20

38

211

00

00

36

213

00

07

79

214

00

10

04

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4231

216¼pdjksM½

00

00

63

224

00

05

31

223

00

04

90

222

00

00

70

221

00

00

80

220

00

01

50

218

00

09

90

145¼pdjksM½

00

00

63

144¼pdjksM½

00

00

63

136

00

00

54

133

00

15

66

132¼pdjksM½

00

02

10

123

00

00

45

125

00

00

39

126

00

00

57

128

00

02

35

129

00

04

80

130

00

00

36

131

00

04

68

104¼pdjksM½

00

00

63

103

00

16

92

97¼ukyk½

00

00

99

iks[kj HkhaMk

224

00

15

41

rIik % xksjk

193 ¼ugj½

00

00

72

190c

00

00

81

190v

00

00

36

ijlk cjok

496

00

00

71

rIik % xksjk

495

00

00

45

421

00

00

58

422

00

04

35

423

00

04

91

424

00

04

37

420

00

19

98

419

00

02

96

416

00

22

93

412

00

04

41

402

00

01

76

406

00

00

89

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4232

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

408

00

00

90

407

00

04

59

395

00

15

08

389

00

00

90

154

00

01

41

155

00

02

82

157

00

00

72

156

00

16

38

152

00

01

44

151

00

00

54

150

00

12

78

149

00

04

90

148

00

04

46

147

00

04

23

145

00

07

45

146

00

05

78

143

00

00

67

129

00

26

75

110

00

01

80

5

00

23

12

6

00

05

67

4

00

03

43

3

00

12

42

7

00

00

36

1

00

00

81

tSriqjk

153v

00

06

62

rIik % iub

153c

00

03

06

147

00

03

15

152

00

02

12

148

00

02

34

149

00

03

35

150

00

04

60

144¼pdjksM½

00

00

36

142

00

02

14

141

00

00

40

134

00

08

85

135

00

00

24

132

00

05

98

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4233

62¼ukyk½

00

00

36

1¼ukyk½

00

03

29

eqUMsjk

1¼ukyk½

00

03

60

rIik % ?krqjk

13

00

11

02

2

00

00

74

11

00

04

19

10

00

03

46

6

00

03

65

9

00

01

11

7

00

06

72

8

00

02

16

4

00

06

19

3 ¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

01

17

clalikj cq>qxZ

69¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

01

98

rIik % ?krqjk

54

00

00

36

55

00

00

36

56

00

00

36

57

00

00

36

58

00

00

36

59

00

00

37

61

00

19

35

60

00

00

53

48¼pdjksM½

00

00

63

46

00

11

34

45¼pdjksM½

00

00

63

39

00

12

37

38

00

04

95

36¼pdjksM½

00

01

20

31

00

09

72

30

00

14

81

25

00

13

86

23¼pdjksM½

00

00

54

9

00

17

32

5

00

05

58

10

00

00

36

4¼pdjksM½

00

00

63

3

00

16

06

cjkjh

435

00

10

40

rIik % ?krqjk

433

00

25

02

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4234

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

432¼pdjksM½

00

00

32

431

00

00

95

413¼pdjksM½

00

01

03

398

00

00

61

402¼pdjksM½

00

00

28

412

00

25

07

407

00

00

36

411

00

10

67

410¼pdjksM½

00

00

38

409

00

00

54

464¼pdjksM½

00

00

63

465

00

09

85

466

00

02

45

467

00

09

76

468¼pdjksM½

00

00

63

469

00

05

94

381¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

01

22

380¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

01

66

347

00

02

79

328¼jkLrk½

00

02

70

245

00

23

08

246

00

05

69

317

00

00

36

316

00

09

41

334¼ugj½

00

04

25

362

00

00

36

373

00

11

90

374

00

00

36

375¼jkLrk½

00

01

66

195

00

21

08

199¼pdjksM½

00

00

63

200

00

15

48

236¼pdjksM½

00

00

63

227

00

00

64

222

00

03

50

219

00

14

22

228

00

04

05

218

00

04

03

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4235

205 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

63

35

00

26

46

24 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

36

36

00

34

17

54 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

63

41

00

10

39

40

00

05

08

xqMjh

287

00

21

58

rIik % fljtke

288

00

38

03

331

00

00

36

305

00

29

75

304

00

06

03

302

00

00

63

145

00

06

89

144

00

05

04

142

00

01

08

141

00

04

37

140

00

11

93

138

00

08

01

137

00

08

01

153

00

00

36

156

00

00

63

160

00

19

58

159

00

01

88

158

00

02

08

247¼pdjksM½

00

00

63

248

00

03

60

249

00

04

41

250

00

08

87

251

00

09

72

253

00

05

85

252

00

03

80

254

00

00

76

256¼jkLrk½

00

00

81

255

00

00

36

60

00

08

64

61

00

09

95

62

00

08

71

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4236

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

63¼pdjksM½

00

00

65

64

00

13

54

65

00

06

48

67

00

03

96

66

00

06

16

72¼pdjksM½

00

00

63

90

00

05

75

89

00

04

18

88

00

08

19

94¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

00

65

112

00

01

44

111

00

07

97

110

00

00

36

114

00

24

52

109

00

00

36

115¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

00

90

cSryiqj

290

00

10

84

rIik % fljtke

291

00

00

36

318

00

00

36

292¼pdjksM½

00

00

63

293

00

02

56

298

00

20

81

300¼pdjksM½

00

00

63

305

00

13

32

307

00

13

37

306

00

00

36

308

00

05

94

315

00

01

26

161

00

06

53

164

00

00

36

162

00

16

20

163

00

00

36

135

00

02

16

27

00

02

25

41

00

02

12

42

00

10

30

87

00

00

63

86

00

02

92

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4237

89

00

00

36

88

00

00

36

¹iQk- la- vkj&25011@23@2013&vksvkj&Iº

iou oqQekj] voj lfpo

MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS

New Delhi, the 5th August, 2013

S.O. 1622.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that

a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited in Tehsil: Bhatpar Rani, District: Deoria in the State

of Uttar Pradesh for 'Siwan to Baitalpur Pipeline' for the transportation of Petroleum Product;

And, whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is

necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which

is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and

Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby

declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the

date on which the copies of the notification issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published

in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of

user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land, to Shri Umakant Tripathi Competent Authority, Indian Oil

Corporation Limited. (Pipelines Division), Subedargunj, P.O: Pipalgaon, District: Allahabad, Pin - 211012, State: Uttar

Pradesh.

SCHEDULE

Tehsil : Deoria

Dist : Deoria

State : Uttar Pradesh

Mouja / Village

Survey/Block. No.

Sub-Div-No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

KUSMAUNI

203

00

00

36

Tappa :-

187

00

15

95

Kachuvar

186

00

12

71

185

00

08

87

184 (Chak Road)

00

00

63

182

00

14

70

Baruadih

450 (Chak Road)

00

00

62

Tappa :-

443

00

09

45

Kachuvar

444

00

00

36

440

00

00

36

445B

00

14

95

445A

00

08

17

432 (Chak Road)

00

02

05

433B

00

05

31

433A

00

00

36

431

00

06

49

430

00

05

69

376 (Chak Road)

00

00

61

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4238

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

308

00

09

48

306B

00

00

54

306A

00

13

38

305

00

15

03

304

00

07

94

319

00

00

36

299

00

01

12

301

00

02

04

300

00

08

85

291

00

00

36

290 (Canal)

00

00

64

289

00

14

87

288A

00

00

36

288B

00

00

36

286

00

02

36

285

00

00

70

284

00

00

36

287

00

00

04

KATOURA KHAJURI

640

00

00

34

Tappa :—

639

00

01

58

Sathiyav

636

00

02

21

637

00

00

36

635

00

00

36

634

00

00

36

608

00

13

74

607

00

07

13

602

00

01

19

632

00

00

36

631

00

00

36

610

00

00

42

609

00

03

41

606

00

01

19

605

00

05

95

596

00

00

28

593

00

00

36

604

00

01

86

603

00

00

36

597

00

02

72

598

00

00

36

590

00

02

20

589

00

00

36

591

00

03

44

592

00

00

24

583

00

00

36

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4239

588

00

03

33

584

00

01

49

587

00

01

22

585

00

05

39

586

00

14

61

572

00

03

39

571(Chak Road)

00

00

61

569

00

00

36

568

00

05

65

567

00

20

69

566(Chak Road)

00

00

65

561

00

16

37

559

00

05

11

557(Chak Road)

00

01

82

558

00

00

36

RAUTPUR

552

00

00

36

Tappa :-

551-B

00

02

42

Kachuvar

550

00

04

59

549

00

04

55

548

00

08

57

547-B

00

03

15

547-A

00

10

94

544(Chak Road)

00

00

90

539

00

19

36

538

00

06

71

526

00

13

28

525

00

05

76

536

00

00

36

534

00

00

36

522

00

02

55

527(Chak Road)

00

00

91

521

00

00

36

529

00

07

26

528-A

00

13

00

528-B

00

03

85

516(Chak Road)

00

00

63

510

00

09

18

509(Chak Road)

00

01

11

508

00

16

25

504-A

00

13

14

502(Chak Road)

00

00

83

457

00

19

30

456

00

21

06

455

00

00

36

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4240

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

459(Chak Road)

00

01

53

460

00

14

85

431

00

20

88

426(Chak Road)

00

00

72

425

00

12

55

422

00

02

48

423

00

04

32

421

00

02

47

424

00

00

36

420

00

23

04

419(Chak Road)

00

00

63

418(Canal)

00

04

86

415

00

19

44

BARADIH

45

00

22

00

Tappa :-

46

00

04

25

Kachuvar

48

00

00

38

47

00

05

40

21(Chak Road)

00

01

89

18

00

00

63

15

00

18

63

16

00

20

07

14

00

00

44

CHAK BANDI URF

79

00

00

62

MATHIA

78

00

07

38

77

00

09

23

76

00

13

18

Tappa :-

75

00

04

46

Kachuvar

26

00

00

36

35(Chak Road)

00

01

08

31-B

00

06

72

31-A

00

01

20

32

00

07

29

33

00

16

61

34(Chak Road)

00

00

36

11-B

00

00

36

12-B

00

00

43

12-A

00

14

58

10

00

00

40

9

00

06

37

8

00

05

98

7

00

00

60

1(Chak Road)

00

00

90

MARIPAR BUZURG

129(BRICK Road)

00

01

22

Tappa :-

132

00

08

51

Kachuvar

131

00

04

72

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4241

134

00

10

19

130

00

00

36

135

00

00

36

136

00

07

51

137

00

18

90

140

00

06

23

141(Chak Road)

00

00

90

142

00

05

61

144

00

09

00

145

00

05

58

146

00

02

70

110

00

16

65

111(Chak Road)

00

00

36

109

00

05

94

105(Road)

00

00

63

35

00

07

56

34

00

09

00

33

00

06

84

32

00

06

39

38(Chak Road)

00

00

63

18

00

01

84

20

00

00

36

17

00

27

03

DUBAULI

160(Chak Road)

00

00

72

Tappa :-

159

00

00

38

Kachuvar

158

00

09

52

157-A

00

07

92

155

00

02

34

153

00

05

46

154

00

01

97

151(Chak Road)

00

00

63

150

00

06

37

123-B

00

11

66

123-A

00

05

31

125

00

00

40

124

00

15

57

122(Chak Road)

00

00

63

106-B

00

26

73

107

00

00

36

110

00

00

36

66(Chak Road)

00

01

62

65

00

10

13

64

00

06

93

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4242

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

63

00

07

16

1(Road)

00

01

17

SARIA

218(Road)

00

01

50

Tappa :-

224B

00

00

51

Kachuvar

224A

00

03

31

222

00

12

78

221

00

04

98

223-B

00

06

08

220

00

10

69

209-A

00

00

36

212

00

01

83

213

00

10

71

139(Road)

00

00

71

128

00

22

64

130

00

05

00

131

00

00

36

95(Road)

00

00

57

98

00

04

13

96(Chak Road)

00

01

13

88

00

18

21

83B

00

05

21

81(Chak Road)

00

01

53

75

00

01

62

76-B

00

04

30

76-A

00

04

41

78 B

00

09

48

78 A

00

09

48

74

00

02

50

79

00

07

82

69

00

05

93

67-A

00

02

89

66-A

00

02

17

Deoria Mir

158B

00

00

36

Tappa :-

158A

00

07

38

Kachuvar

1(Nala)

00

01

08

11

00

07

02

12

00

03

10

9

00

07

92

7

00

01

26

6

00

05

94

4

00

03

42

5

00

00

36

3

00

02

88

2A

00

00

36

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4243

Chakrawa

367

00

17

86

Dhus

360

00

05

04

Tappa :-

361

00

04

25

Kachuvar

362

00

00

36

353

00

08

40

352A

00

13

50

351

00

00

36

349(Chak Road)

00

00

72

348

00

09

36

347B

00

04

77

347A

00

05

13

344

00

10

44

342(Chak Road)

00

00

68

341

00

13

50

340

00

00

36

338(Chak Road)

00

00

63

336A

00

08

10

337A

00

00

36

330

00

14

94

328B

00

01

08

328A

00

03

96

327

00

01

26

326B

00

04

86

325

00

08

10

266(Road)

00

01

26

319

00

00

36

265

00

03

24

260

00

05

76

259(Chak Road)

00

00

63

258

00

00

54

256

00

12

96

255

00

14

94

Nala

00

01

53

Padari

73

00

00

36

Tappa :-

72

00

01

35

Kachuvar

60

00

00

81

GHATAILA GAZI

442(Nala)

00

02

34

Tappa :-

509

00

01

36

Kachuvar

508

00

01

84

507

00

05

22

506

00

02

61

505

00

05

76

481

00

02

18

480

00

00

36

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4244

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

504

00

00

72

467

00

00

63

502

00

08

28

482

00

00

36

503

00

00

36

477

00

13

14

474

00

01

80

476

00

01

54

475

00

07

02

458(Chak Road)

00

00

90

459

00

06

68

460

00

06

70

461

00

03

78

455

00

13

32

462

00

00

33

453(Chak Road)

00

01

98

454

00

00

36

452

00

07

13

402(Road)

00

02

63

280

00

14

22

277

00

05

71

285

00

09

54

283

00

00

54

284

00

00

36

288

00

14

02

287

00

00

55

290(Chak Road)

00

00

90

300

00

09

50

309

00

00

36

291

00

00

36

293

00

09

72

295

00

00

39

294

00

05

22

386

00

00

36

313(Chak Road)

00

00

54

314

00

01

00

327( Road)

00

01

26

385(Chak Road)

00

00

36

384

00

08

46

383

00

07

56

382

00

11

88

380

00

00

36

379

00

11

52

378

00

04

05

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4245

355(Chak Road)

00

01

62

343

00

15

16

345

00

05

00

344

00

05

58

140

00

00

72

BADAHARA

572

00

27

59

Tappa :—

549

00

02

34

Kachuvar

548

00

00

72

547

00

02

16

546

00

09

54

545

00

00

72

540

00

13

59

541

00

00

36

542

00

00

36

539

00

07

56

538

00

00

36

166

00

09

00

164

00

07

47

156

00

00

36

157

00

05

04

155

00

00

74

158

00

10

67

160

00

05

76

159

00

05

22

161

00

00

36

Road

00

04

14

143

00

15

84

142

00

03

32

141

00

05

40

140

00

09

51

135(Chak Road)

00

00

54

128

00

06

55

127

00

10

26

123

00

00

63

108

00

01

34

107(Chak Road)

00

00

72

106

00

19

26

105

00

00

81

102(Chak Road)

00

00

54

108

00

03

25

101

00

06

48

PAGARA Urf PARASIA

256

00

11

16

Tappa :—

255(Chak Road)

00

00

72

Kachuvar

235

00

10

44

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4246

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

234

00

02

09

236

00

09

18

237

00

08

46

232

00

00

30

238(Cart Track)

00

02

05

242

00

04

86

240

00

11

43

241

00

13

68

212(Chak Road)

00

00

72

166

00

06

03

167

00

00

36

165

00

10

80

164

00

01

56

163

00

13

22

155

00

00

54

RAMPUR

207

00

01

45

Tappa :-

206B

00

03

65

Kachuvar

206A

00

14

84

205(Chak Road)

00

00

66

200B

00

02

25

199

00

36

48

183

00

00

36

202(Chak Road)

00

00

65

203

00

03

91

192(Chak Road)

00

01

24

182A

00

07

90

182B

00

00

36

180(Chak Road)

00

00

71

178A

00

02

50

178B

00

00

36

85

00

00

36

84

00

24

09

83

00

01

52

119B

00

00

77

82

00

00

20

81

00

00

36

77

00

00

56

KUSMAHA URF BELWA

180B

00

04

54

Tappa :-

180A

00

10

21

Kachuvar

179

00

03

93

182A

00

24

93

182B

00

00

20

178(Canal)

00

01

25

177(Road)

00

00

46

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4247

176

00

09

74

169(Chak Road)

00

00

72

167

00

13

39

166(Chak Road)

00

01

08

146

00

06

00

147

00

10

93

148

00

12

83

150

00

06

88

149

00

00

36

143(Chak Road)

00

00

87

142

00

14

06

138

00

01

83

131(Road)

00

00

19

133

00

00

36

137A

00

06

62

139

00

00

50

137B

00

12

81

136(Chak Road)

00

00

70

23

00

08

84

22

00

13

28

20

00

02

40

19

00

02

05

1(Nala)

00

02

22

DHANAUTI KHURD

177(Nala)

00

01

29

Tappa :—

176(Nala)

00

01

75

Govrai

174

00

03

82

169

00

06

34

168

00

08

41

167

00

07

06

165(Chak Road)

00

00

97

164

00

06

78

163(Chak Road)

00

01

13

162

00

08

85

161(Chak Road)

00

00

64

160

00

08

74

155

00

02

31

126(Chak Road)

00

00

74

91

00

01

71

90

00

00

36

92

00

16

94

86

00

04

81

93(Chak Road)

00

02

58

125

00

01

72

82

00

32

47

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4248

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

81

00

22

17

34(Road)

00

02

12

7

00

18

75

12

00

00

18

11

00

19

11

8

00

00

36

9

00

01

26

10

00

08

85

25(Chak Road)

00

01

05

MUNDERA

25

00

05

63

Tappa :-

23

00

04

42

Govrai

22

00

10

78

21B

00

02

08

21A

00

10

01

20(Chak Road)

00

00

74

19B

00

00

91

19A

00

07

91

18A

00

03

26

18B

00

03

18

17(Road)

00

01

29

16B

00

12

56

16A

00

02

80

15A

00

09

21

10

00

05

33

9(Chak Road)

00

00

61

8B

00

07

82

8A

00

00

66

7

00

05

88

POKHAR BHINDA

173

00

00

36

Tappa :—

73

00

00

36

Govrai

72

00

10

62

71

00

00

36

68

00

00

36

50/3

00

02

55

49

00

02

95

48

00

06

28

45

00

00

48

46

00

05

85

47

00

05

85

BHAGAUTIPUR

72-A

00

01

13

Tappa :—

72-B

00

07

87

Govrai

71-B

00

05

22

77

00

02

52

78

00

11

34

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4249

79

00

06

43

81

00

00

36

80

00

07

47

83-B

00

05

83

97(Chak Road)

00

01

08

111

00

00

36

110

00

00

69

99

00

12

07

100

00

00

76

109-B

00

00

46

101

00

04

32

106-A

00

04

14

107

00

04

68

108(Chak Road)

00

00

90

BARARI

99

00

13

90

Tappa :-

102

00

04

32

Govrai

103(Chak Road)

00

00

63

104

00

26

82

106

00

00

36

105

00

00

36

108

00

10

57

91(Road)

00

04

75

51

00

13

23

49

00

00

36

52

00

01

75

68

00

04

83

53

00

04

23

60

00

00

36

62

00

18

54

67

00

00

36

42

00

01

05

63

00

05

22

64

00

00

51

17(Canal)

00

05

22

16

00

00

51

15

00

00

36

13

00

04

10

BHEEMPUR

580(Canal)

00

01

08

Tappa :-

452

00

06

88

Govrai

451

00

02

34

450

00

01

01

449

00

17

06

448(Road)

00

01

80

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4250

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

GAURA KHAS

1084

00

33

21

Tappa :-

1076(Chak Road)

00

00

63

Gora

1075(Chak Road)

00

00

76

1055

00

19

01

1058

00

00

36

1057

00

00

40

1056

00

06

41

1043

00

16

83

1042

00

00

63

1038

00

04

86

1061

00

00

36

1037

00

03

83

1029

00

00

36

1059

00

01

58

1060

00

06

03

1032(Chak Road)

00

00

63

1061

00

00

36

1031(Chak Road)

00

00

63

1017

00

00

36

1016

00

07

47

1026

00

00

36

1014-1102(Chak Road)

00

00

63

1015

00

30

96

1013

00

22

50

1018(Chak Road)

00

00

63

320(Chak Road)

00

00

63

315

00

33

12

314(Canal)

00

01

35

313

00

10

08

226(Chak Road)

00

01

44

311

00

00

36

310

00

00

36

225(Chak Road)

00

01

44

210

00

12

78

212

00

20

38

211

00

00

36

213

00

07

79

214

00

10

04

216(Chak Road)

00

00

63

224

00

05

31

223

00

04

90

222

00

00

70

221

00

00

80

220

00

01

50

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4251

218

00

09

90

145(Chak Road)

00

00

63

144(Chak Road)

00

00

63

136

00

00

54

133

00

15

66

132(Chak Road)

00

02

10

123

00

00

45

125

00

00

39

126

00

00

57

128

00

02

35

129

00

04

80

130

00

00

36

131

00

04

68

104(Chak Road)

00

00

63

103

00

16

92

97(Nala)

00

00

99

POKHAR BHINDA

224

00

15

41

Tappa :-

193 (Field Channel)

00

00

72

Gora

190/B

00

00

81

190/A

00

00

36

PARSA BARWA

496

00

00

71

Tappa :-Gora

495

00

00

45

421

00

00

58

422

00

04

35

423

00

04

91

424

00

04

37

420

00

19

98

419

00

02

96

416

00

22

93

412

00

04

41

402

00

01

76

406

00

00

89

408

00

00

90

407

00

04

59

395

00

15

08

389

00

00

90

154

00

01

41

155

00

02

82

157

00

00

72

156

00

16

38

152

00

01

44

151

00

00

54

150

00

12

78

149

00

04

90

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4252

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

148

00

04

46

147

00

04

23

145

00

07

45

146

00

05

78

143

00

00

67

129

00

26

75

110

00

01

80

5

00

23

12

6

00

05

67

4

00

03

43

3

00

12

42

7

00

00

36

1

00

00

81

JAITPURA

153 A

00

06

62

Tappa :-Panai

153 B

00

03

06

147

00

03

15

152

00

02

12

148

00

02

34

149

00

03

35

150

00

04

60

144(Chak Road)

00

00

36

142

00

02

14

141

00

00

40

134

00

08

85

135

00

00

24

132

00

05

98

62(Nala)

00

00

36

1(Nala)

00

03

29

MUNDERA

1(Nala)

00

03

60

Tappa :-

13

00

11

02

Dhatura

2

00

00

74

11

00

04

19

10

00

03

46

6

00

03

65

9

00

01

11

7

00

06

72

8

00

02

16

4

00

06

19

3 (Cart Track)

00

01

17

BASNSPAR

69(Cart Track)

00

01

98

BUZURG

54

00

00

36

Tappa :-

55

00

00

36

Dhatura

56

00

00

36

57

00

00

36

58

00

00

36

59

00

00

37

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4253

61

00

19

35

60

00

00

53

48(Chak Road)

00

00

63

46

00

11

34

45(Chak Road)

00

00

63

39

00

12

37

38

00

04

95

36(Chak Road)

00

01

20

31

00

09

72

30

00

14

81

25

00

13

86

23(Chak Road)

00

00

54

9

00

17

32

5

00

05

58

10

00

00

36

4(Chak Road)

00

00

63

3

00

16

06

BARARI

435

00

10

40

Tappa :-

433

00

25

02

Dhatura

432(Chak Road)

00

00

32

431

00

00

95

413(Chak Road)

00

01

03

398

00

00

61

402(Chak Road)

00

00

28

412

00

25

07

407

00

00

36

411

00

10

67

410(Chak Road)

00

00

38

409

00

00

54

464(Chak Road)

00

00

63

465

00

09

85

466

00

02

45

467

00

09

76

468(Chak Road)

00

00

63

469

00

05

94

381(Cart Track)

00

01

22

380(Cart Track)

00

01

66

347

00

02

79

328 (Road)

00

02

70

245

00

23

08

246

00

05

69

247 (Chak Road)

00

00

63

248

00

03

60

249

00

04

41

250

00

08

87

251

00

09

72

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4254

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

253

00

05

85

252

00

03

80

254

00

00

76

256(Road)

00

00

81

255

00

00

36

60

00

08

64

61

00

09

95

62

00

08

71

63(Chak Road)

00

00

65

64

00

13

54

65

00

06

48

67

00

03

96

66

00

06

16

72(Chak Road)

00

00

63

90

00

05

75

89

00

04

18

88

00

08

19

94(Cart Track)

00

00

65

112

00

01

44

111

00

07

97

110

00

00

36

114

00

24

52

109

00

00

36

115(Cart Track)

00

00

90

BAITALPUR

290

00

10

84

Tappa :-

291

00

00

36

Sirjam

318

00

00

36

292(Chak Road)

00

00

63

293

00

02

56

298

00

20

81

300(Chak Road)

00

00

63

305

00

13

32

307

00

13

37

306

00

00

36

308

00

05

94

315

00

01

26

317

00

00

36

316

00

09

41

334(Canal)

00

04

25

362

00

00

36

373

00

11

90

374

00

00

36

375(Road)

00

01

66

195

00

21

08

199(Chak Road)

00

00

63

200

00

15

48

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4255

236(Chak Road)

00

00

63

227

00

00

64

222

00

03

50

219

00

14

22

228

00

04

05

218

00

04

03

205(Chak Road)

00

00

63

35

00

26

46

24(Chak Road)

00

00

36

36

00

34

17

54(Chak Road)

00

00

63

41

00

10

39

40

00

05

08

GUDRI

287

00

21

58

Tappa :-

288

00

38

03

Sirjam

331

00

00

36

305

00

29

75

304

00

06

03

302

00

00

63

145

00

06

89

144

00

05

04

142

00

01

08

141

00

04

37

140

00

11

93

138

00

08

01

137

00

08

01

153

00

00

36

156

00

00

63

160

00

19

58

159

00

01

88

158

00

02

08

161

00

06

53

164

00

00

36

162

00

16

20

163

00

00

36

135

00

02

16

27

00

02

25

41

00

02

12

42

00

10

30

87

00

00

63

86

00

02

92

89

00

00

36

88

00

00

36

[F. No. R-25011/23/2013-OR-I]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

ubZ fnYyh] 5 vxLr] 2013

dk-vk- 1623-—dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slk izrhr gksrk gS fd yksd fgr esa ;g vko“;d gS fd floku ls cSrkyiqj rd

isVªksfy;e inkFkkasZ ds ifjogu gsrq rglhy % ÒkVij jkuh] ftyk % n¢ofj¸kk] jkT;% mŸkj çn¢“k esa bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs“ku fyfeVsM }kjk

ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkuh pkfg, A

vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slh ikbiykbu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, vko“;d izrhr gksrk gS fd ml Hkwfe esa ftlds Hkhrj

mDr ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkus dk izLrko gS vkSj tks bl vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa of.kZr gS] mi;ksx dk vtZu fd;k tk,(

vr% vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] iSVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbUl ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½ vf/kfu;e] 1962 ¼1962

dk 50½ dh /kkjk 3 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk iznÙk “kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] mDr Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/akdkj dk vtZu djus ds vius

vk“k; dh ?kks’k.kk djrh gS(

dksbZ O;fDr] tks mDr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa fgrc) gS] ml rkjh[k ls ftldks] Hkkjr ds jkti= esa ;Fkk izdkf“kr bl

vf/klwpuk dh izfr;ka lk/kkj.k turk dks miyC/k djk nh tkrh gSa] bDdhl fnu ds vUnj] Hkwfe ds Hkhrj ikbiykbu fcNk, tkus gsrq

mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj ds vtZu ds fy,] Jh mekdkar f«kikBh] l{ke izkf/kdkjh bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs“ku fyfeVsM] ¼ikbiykbu fMohtu½]

lqcsnkjxat] iks-vks % ihiyxkWao] ftyk % bykgkckn] fiu % 211012] jkT;% mŸkj izns“k dks fyf[kr :i eas vk{ksi Hkst ldsxkA

vuqlwph

rglhy % HkkVij jkuh

ftyk nsofj;k

jkT; % mÙkj izns'k

ekStk@xzke

losZ@Cykd@la- (IyksV la-)

lc&Mho&la-

{ks=kiQy

gsDVs;j

vkjs

oxZ ehVj

1

2

3

4

5

6

cudVk frjlsu

43

00

04

14

¼cudVk fNrjlsu½

42

00

00

36

rIik % cyhoku

41

00

00

36

44

00

01

44

52 ¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

00

90

36

00

10

26

35

00

00

36

37

00

05

58

38

00

12

60

39

00

06

30

cudVk txnh“k

395

00

01

31

rIik % cyhoku

391

00

10

44

392

00

00

36

390¼pd ekxZ½

00

01

08

389

00

09

72

387

00

00

36

386

00

00

57

327¼jkLrk½

00

04

14

308

00

00

36

4256

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4257

309

00

01

80

310

00

07

56

311

00

04

32

313

00

04

14

312¼pd ekxZ½

00

01

08

297

00

15

66

296

00

12

96

279

00

03

24

280

00

14

04

281

00

05

76

282

00

00

36

283

00

00

36

215¼pd ekxZ½

00

01

08

240

00

11

34

237¼pd ekxZ½

00

00

20

236

00

07

02

235

00

05

04

233

00

02

52

231

00

02

34

230

00

03

78

229¼pd ekxZ½

00

00

72

227

00

00

66

228

00

06

12

225

00

05

58

224

00

00

36

223¼pd ekxZ½

00

00

72

220

00

08

82

218

00

00

36

219

00

08

46

121¼pd ekxZ½

00

00

54

120¼jkLrk½

00

00

72

24

00

05

22

23

00

00

36

25

00

00

70

26

00

00

36

27

00

00

36

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4258

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

22

00

05

40

19

00

05

04

17

00

05

22

18

00

05

58

115

00

00

36

39

00

00

36

29¼ukyk½

00

02

34

16

00

00

36

15

00

00

36

37

00

00

69

36

00

01

80

35

00

04

68

34

00

06

48

33

00

06

30

32

00

04

14

30

00

04

50

10

00

05

94

11¼jkLrk½

00

01

98

HkFkgh lsod pd

415¼jkLrk½

00

01

58

rIik % cyhoku

399

00

04

16

398

00

08

60

396

00

01

70

397

00

18

18

386

00

08

95

387

00

00

81

385

00

10

85

383¼jkLrk½

00

02

83

277

00

02

20

276

00

07

31

275

00

10

84

274

00

02

20

272

00

06

16

273

00

01

19

271

00

02

37

278¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

01

39

284

00

01

19

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4259

283

00

02

39

282

00

01

19

281

00

08

77

279

00

08

73

269

00

01

19

267

00

05

08

265

00

01

19

266¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

02

21

225¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

01

19

30

00

13

16

24¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

01

55

22

00

04

32

29

00

01

19

21

00

00

81

20

00

10

93

19

00

06

39

18

00

08

42

17

00

10

85

16¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

04

37

HkkFkjgh tehu

43

00

00

36

rIik % cyhoku

42

00

00

36

38

00

04

40

37

00

08

59

34

00

00

36

36

00

01

01

35

00

03

20

33

00

00

36

14

00

08

28

12

00

14

35

11

00

00

36

9

00

01

40

bUnjok

47¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

03

28

rIik % cyhoku

45

00

16

02

46

00

04

05

fd'kksjh Nkij

328

00

13

13

rIik % cyhoku

325

00

03

15

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4260

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

320

00

01

22

321¼pd ekxZ½

00

03

20

324

00

02

70

322

00

08

34

319

00

05

13

318¼pd ekxZ½

00

00

65

313

00

00

36

314

00

17

54

315

00

01

20

308¼pd ekxZ½

00

01

01

303

00

22

34

302

00

10

47

301

00

01

17

300

00

03

14

299

00

06

98

jrfl;k

942

00

00

36

rIik % cyhoku

941

00

02

77

940

00

04

32

939

00

00

36

936¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

01

98

935

00

08

82

934

00

10

48

932¼pd ekxZ½

00

01

08

916

00

24

14

915

00

01

82

914

00

00

55

910

00

01

26

879¼ukyk½

00

02

47

911

00

01

36

856

00

00

36

857

00

03

51

871

00

01

26

867¼pd ekxZ½

00

00

61

863

00

05

28

864

00

05

83

865

00

07

04

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4261

866

00

00

68

862¼pd ekxZ½

00

01

12

861

00

17

51

860

00

00

63

821¼jkLrk½

00

03

06

820

00

20

59

809

00

00

36

814¼pd ekxZ½

00

02

34

713

00

11

47

726¼pd ekxZ½

00

01

08

727

00

04

43

728

00

05

40

729

00

10

53

730

00

06

66

731

00

04

88

732

00

05

83

733

00

05

85

735

00

07

54

736

00

03

33

753¼pd ekxZ½

00

00

90

754¼pd ekxZ½

00

00

90

777

00

00

36

776

00

00

56

775

00

06

32

773

00

04

97

772¼pd ekxZ½

00

00

63

771

00

10

98

770

00

04

21

769

00

05

26

768¼pd ekxZ½

00

01

19

767

00

05

76

764

00

04

82

763

00

02

76

idfM;k dqaM

243

00

06

59

rIik % cyhoku

220

00

02

16

151

00

00

14

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4262

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

150

00

00

36

152

00

01

66

153

00

03

31

154

00

02

74

168¼pd ekxZ½

00

00

90

169

00

04

55

170

00

03

24

171

00

03

38

172

00

03

53

173

00

03

46

176¼pd ekxZ½

00

00

90

177

00

02

81

178

00

04

05

186

00

12

64

188

00

04

81

189

00

06

05

194

00

00

36

195

00

02

15

196

00

04

97

197

00

02

60

199

00

00

36

204¼pd ekxZ½

00

00

44

201

00

02

35

206

00

00

36

200

00

23

62

100¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

00

90

25

00

05

63

22

00

04

59

21

00

06

80

20

00

03

08

18

00

03

49

17

00

02

16

16

00

01

50

15

00

00

36

fldfV;k uk;d

1029¼jkLrk½

00

02

79

rIik % cyhoku

1088

00

03

87

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4263

1087

00

06

03

1086

00

07

33

1084

00

06

52

1083

00

06

62

1082

00

00

36

1081

00

00

36

1032¼jkLrk½

00

00

90

1025

00

17

56

1024

00

13

12

1020

00

01

91

1005¼jkLrk½

00

02

83

159

00

00

36

160

00

02

25

161

00

09

03

162

00

04

13

163

00

00

36

164

00

13

86

165

00

00

36

199¼pd ekxZ½

00

01

73

203

00

02

32

201

00

00

77

184

00

01

67

186

00

02

20

185

00

00

37

200

00

00

36

187

00

09

86

198

00

00

58

194¼pd ekxZ½

00

00

72

197

00

21

06

196

00

00

54

195

00

04

72

214

00

03

51

62

00

05

31

xt rMok

681¼unh½

00

12

89

rIik % xskrek

700

00

00

36

699

00

05

69

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4264

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

698

00

00

36

697

00

00

36

701

00

09

42

696

00

12

70

695

00

00

99

693

00

00

36

692

00

07

94

691

00

03

79

690

00

00

44

689

00

04

57

688

00

01

19

687

00

10

41

685

00

01

34

684

00

00

36

665¼pd ekxZ½

00

00

67

646

00

01

56

645

00

04

03

634

00

00

94

633

00

05

10

631

00

05

37

630¼pd ekxZ½

00

01

11

629

00

07

07

601¼pd ekxZ½

00

00

81

581

00

04

02

580

00

00

52

582

00

11

38

584

00

07

90

585¼pd ekxZ½

00

01

13

586

00

12

76

589

00

00

36

579¼jkLrk½

00

02

58

573

00

00

36

574

00

11

56

575

00

03

92

576

00

00

36

572

00

03

43

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4265

571

00

01

94

577

00

00

36

565

00

04

11

564

00

04

03

563

00

03

54

562

00

02

56

559

00

01

93

558

00

05

97

556

00

12

33

551

00

00

36

550

00

04

68

548

00

05

15

549¼jkLrk½

00

00

36

578

00

00

48

vkyhvk pd

95

00

04

18

rIik % xskrek

92

00

01

64

91

00

00

36

1¼jkLrk½

00

05

90

c=kSyh

375¼jkLrk½

00

01

71

rIik % xskrek

393

00

08

07

392¼pd ekxZ½

00

00

67

391

00

09

43

388

00

08

78

387

00

07

75

386

00

06

72

385

00

07

80

383¼pd ekxZ½

00

00

54

377

00

10

86

378

00

04

04

379

00

05

00

380

00

01

27

374¼pd ekxZ½

00

00

82

373

00

04

72

372

00

07

80

369

00

07

02

368

00

00

36

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4266

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

340¼Msªbu½

00

02

16

444

00

00

36

445

00

07

32

446

00

12

26

449¼pd ekxZ½

00

00

65

339

00

17

69

338

00

00

36

336

00

22

71

327

00

00

36

334

00

05

79

328

00

00

42

333

00

03

53

332

00

05

88

306

00

03

17

304

00

11

74

236¼jkLrk½

00

01

08

235

00

01

16

ikaMsiqj

17

00

15

23

rIik % xskrek

16¼pd ekxZ½

00

01

70

15

00

01

67

12

00

04

92

11

00

04

11

10

00

17

73

rkaMok

479¼jkLrk½

00

00

92

rIik % xskrek

477

00

01

04

476

00

12

24

468¼pd ekxZ½

00

00

81

377

00

11

70

375

00

11

52

374

00

02

46

373

00

05

33

372

00

00

36

371¼pd ekxZ½

00

00

90

370

00

12

60

365

00

05

69

364

00

08

21

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4267

363¼pd ekxZ½

00

00

72

356

00

01

44

355

00

09

70

357

00

03

20

358

00

03

52

353

00

08

96

352

00

02

70

351

00

05

26

345

00

02

72

344

00

01

89

fNrkSuh

574¼jkLrk½

00

04

86

rIik % xskrek

576

00

01

41

572

00

08

25

573

00

00

27

554¼pd ekxZ½

00

00

54

539

00

07

18

538

00

16

81

526

00

14

00

525¼pd ekxZ½

00

00

54

523

00

06

05

524

00

04

50

521

00

00

68

520

00

07

92

469¼jkLrk½

00

02

32

ckyHknª pd

160¼jkLrk½

00

00

81

rIik % xskrek

103

00

00

45

104

00

05

70

102

00

00

65

101

00

00

69

100

00

00

69

99

00

00

31

98

00

04

22

97

00

03

97

96

00

03

33

94¼pd ekxZ½

00

00

54

92

00

18

34

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4268

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

91

00

05

25

90

00

04

53

89

00

04

37

86

00

10

29

78¼pd ekxZ½

00

00

59

87

00

00

36

75

00

19

85

76¼pd ekxZ½

00

00

56

70

00

07

15

71

00

00

79

68

00

07

93

62

00

03

72

63¼pd ekxZ½

00

00

63

58

00

03

14

59

00

00

36

57

00

03

18

56

00

03

34

55

00

03

42

54

00

08

53

53¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

00

81

74¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

01

06

cynhgk

35¼jkLrk½

00

01

84

rIik % xskrek

32

00

34

17

33

00

01

45

31

00

03

77

30

00

01

09

29¼pd ekxZ½

00

00

65

25

00

16

10

cjk;ij ikaMs

911¼jkLrk½

00

00

84

rIik % xskrek

910

00

01

80

909

00

09

31

907

00

08

96

900

00

07

61

901

00

08

86

899

00

04

23

896

00

00

64

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4269

890

00

05

76

891

00

09

87

893¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

00

72

463

00

05

23

465

00

15

05

464

00

00

36

466

00

10

18

453¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

00

69

442

00

06

04

441

00

03

52

443

00

04

17

444

00

04

72

446

00

05

46

436¼jkLrk½

00

00

55

431

00

03

29

430

00

08

52

429

00

08

68

427

00

00

84

418

00

02

59

425

00

08

80

419

00

01

75

424

00

03

88

423

00

02

53

421¼ukyk½

00

02

65

420 ¼ukyk½

00

00

35

iqjSuk

114

00

13

00

rIik % xskrek

113

00

03

47

116 ¼ukyk½

00

00

36

117

00

00

36

110

00

09

79

115 ¼pd ekxZ½

00

00

36

119

00

00

36

109

00

10

24

75 ¼jkLrk½

00

01

16

33

00

18

60

35

00

00

18

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4270

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

34

00

00

18

320 ¼pd ekxZ½

00

07

75

319

00

00

36

321

00

00

36

32

00

04

92

29

00

08

06

28

00

00

59

322

00

00

54

324

00

00

36

328

00

00

36

329

00

00

36

330

00

00

36

334

00

00

36

27

00

07

24

25

00

09

93

24

00

10

51

23

00

03

00

22

00

07

45

324 ¼pd ekxZ½

00

04

78

335

00

00

58

ckgyksok

244¼ukyk½

00

00

85

rIik % gosyh

220

00

37

01

221

00

00

36

200¼jkLrk½

00

01

83

164

00

20

51

172

00

00

36

171

00

00

36

165¼pd ekxZ½

00

04

70

170

00

00

23

169

00

00

18

168

00

00

84

155

00

07

36

154

00

03

69

153

00

10

46

166

00

01

19

92¼pd ekxZ½

00

00

59

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4271

26

00

17

22

25

00

00

36

27

00

27

46

33

00

02

64

32

00

12

63

Hkkyh Nkijk

519

00

00

38

rIik % gosyh

525

00

00

36

511

00

05

85

512

00

06

21

513

00

05

31

514

00

05

58

515

00

11

16

516

00

09

45

517

00

02

48

518

00

00

36

509

00

12

21

508

00

23

76

490 ¼pd ekxZ½

00

00

63

468

00

07

02

469

00

15

12

462

00

07

92

460

00

00

63

470 ¼jkLrk½

00

01

26

458

00

03

56

457

00

00

72

486

00

00

49

471

00

15

30

473 ¼pd ekxZ½

00

00

63

302

00

09

36

304

00

11

16

305

00

07

47

353

00

11

62

354

00

03

74

358 ¼pd ekxZ½

00

00

72

399 ¼pd ekxZ½

00

00

36

457

00

00

36

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4272

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

359

00

04

96

361

00

27

36

409 ¼pd ekxZ½

00

00

63

398

00

00

36

397 ¼pd ekxZ½

00

00

81

394

00

04

05

395

00

08

46

396

00

08

46

tksxkSj

116 ¼jkLrk½

00

00

72

rIik % gosyh

113

00

10

53

112

00

09

45

119 ¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

00

63

109

00

11

16

126 ¼pd ekxZ½

00

00

63

82

00

21

69

76 ¼pd ekxZ½

00

00

63

75

00

03

33

74

00

10

53

73

00

05

13

72

00

11

05

60

00

00

36

69 ¼pd ekxZ½

00

00

36

54

00

00

36

53

00

00

36

62

00

00

36

71

00

16

69

70

00

05

67

50 ¼pd ekxZ½

00

01

22

52

00

00

15

51

00

00

17

43

00

00

04

49

00

00

30

ek/kksiqj ¼e/kkSj½

350

00

07

01

rIik % gosyh

349

00

06

21

348

00

12

33

347

00

06

03

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4273

346

00

00

63

298 ¼jkLrk½

00

01

55

344

00

03

69

341

00

07

45

340

00

06

30

328

00

06

30

326

00

01

84

325

00

03

17

324

00

08

06

323

00

07

81

308 ¼pd ekxZ½

00

00

59

312

00

08

53

313

00

00

36

311

00

18

50

92 ¼pd ekxZ½

00

00

59

87

00

08

59

86

00

07

04

85 ¼pd ekxZ½

00

00

59

81

00

12

19

82

00

07

76

80

00

08

09

78

00

00

36

79

00

03

69

99 ¼pd ekxZ½

00

02

44

97

00

00

28

98

00

01

71

96

00

00

36

100

00

03

11

70 ¼pd ekxZ½

00

00

61

35

00

18

18

39

00

00

36

38

00

14

04

37 ¼pd ekxZ½

00

00

68

tlqb

285

00

15

21

rIik % gosyh

286 ¼pd ekxZ½

00

00

59

339

00

00

36

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4274

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

338

00

00

36

287

00

07

02

289

00

13

86

290 ¼pd ekxZ½

00

00

54

291

00

04

28

296

00

36

22

300

00

06

80

297

00

00

36

298

00

05

76

299

00

00

70

161 ¼jkLrk½

00

03

69

120

00

00

36

117

00

00

36

110

00

01

43

111

00

06

00

112

00

01

43

108

00

23

58

107

00

10

20

106 ¼pd ekxZ½

00

01

82

96

00

04

41

37 ¼jkLrk½

00

01

44

36

00

15

08

35

00

02

48

fc'kquiqjk

341

00

05

76

rIik % gosyh

340

00

06

48

339

00

03

76

202 ¼jkLrk½

00

00

53

104

00

00

27

103

00

00

36

Vsaxjh

215

00

00

61

rIik % gosyh

214

00

08

30

213

00

02

16

212

00

02

83

211

00

03

45

210

00

03

78

207

00

08

64

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4275

206

00

07

13

205

00

04

09

204

00

03

96

203 ¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

00

21

201

00

00

10

145 ¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

00

54

139

00

00

72

138

00

04

95

137 ¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

01

15

136

00

00

66

140

00

00

76

121

00

06

19

120

00

09

09

122

00

05

55

119

00

03

30

118

00

02

25

123

00

00

54

129@216 ¼pd ekxZ½

00

00

36

107

00

00

36

105

00

00

36

106

00

00

36

117

00

05

94

116

00

01

89

115

00

01

58

114

00

01

62

113

00

01

53

112

00

03

19

108

00

04

68

109

00

00

36

97 ¼pd ekxZ½

00

00

54

96

00

04

68

95

00

05

20

94

00

02

43

93

00

02

70

89

00

03

97

90

00

17

03

88

00

00

36

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4276

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

cjdk xkao

555¼pd ekxZ½

00

00

59

rIik % gosyh

556

00

09

68

557

00

11

07

558

00

03

80

560

00

14

51

562

00

02

30

561

00

19

64

569

00

23

52

570¼pd ekxZ½

00

03

36

581

00

03

13

582

00

05

96

568

00

01

35

594¼jkLrk½

00

00

63

623

00

13

86

622

00

00

36

624

00

11

76

621

00

00

36

620

00

02

88

625

00

05

22

619

00

03

41

618

00

10

88

627

00

00

66

628

00

00

36

629¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

01

17

637

00

07

38

638

00

08

28

636

00

00

36

639

00

04

90

640

00

04

18

641

00

06

57

642

00

04

14

643

00

13

77

56¼pd ekxZ½

00

00

63

669

00

15

12

670

00

00

36

668

00

02

36

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4277

674

00

07

88

673

00

00

56

672¼jkLrk½

00

02

25

691

00

00

36

682

00

13

45

683

00

00

36

692

00

03

29

681¼pd ekxZ½

00

01

50

680

00

03

86

712

00

07

92

711¼pd ekxZ½

00

00

63

710

00

09

72

709

00

00

36

727

00

05

58

728

00

01

83

729

00

01

33

706

00

12

89

705

00

00

36

755

00

15

16

756

00

04

32

757

00

05

18

758

00

04

81

759

00

01

09

871

00

00

36

873¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

07

74

936

00

00

93

938

00

05

55

941

00

00

50

942

00

00

36

939

00

00

63

940

00

04

01

944

00

04

64

945

00

04

16

947

00

02

81

950

00

04

03

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4278

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

955¼pd ekxZ½

00

00

60

954

00

01

08

949

00

00

72

951

00

04

98

962

00

02

56

fiijk fcBy

914

00

01

43

rIik % ?kkVh

913

00

00

36

912

00

00

36

911

00

00

36

yky pd

334

00

08

46

rIik % ?kkVh

333

00

01

47

332

00

00

36

329

00

09

59

328

00

06

48

326

00

03

72

327

00

13

05

322

00

00

36

324

00

03

44

323

00

04

11

280

00

13

23

308

00

08

00

307

00

00

36

294

00

02

76

303

00

02

88

304

00

00

36

302

00

03

82

301

00

03

78

149&339¼pdjksM½

00

00

67

147

00

00

36

149

00

16

56

152

00

16

20

154¼pdjksM½

00

01

04

159

00

00

26

160

00

04

07

161

00

01

13

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4279

153¼pdjksM½

00

00

90

110

00

07

74

106¼pdjksM½

00

00

63

105

00

13

73

104¼pdjksM½

00

00

63

68

00

00

36

94

00

06

48

93&337

00

00

56

69¼pdjksM½

00

01

23

93

00

00

67

50

00

02

02

49

00

06

90

45

00

03

96

44

00

04

18

43

00

05

35

38

00

11

02

¹iQk- la- vkj-&25011@23@2013&vksvkj&Iº

iou oqQekj] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 5th August, 2013

S.O. 1623.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that a

pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited in Tehsil Bhatpar Rani, District Deoria in the State of Uttar

Pradesh for 'Siwan to Baitalpur Pipeline' for the transportation of Petroleum Product;

And, whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary

to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which is described in the

Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals

Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention

to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty-one days from the date on

which the copies of the notification issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of

India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the

pipeline under the land, to Shri Umakant Tripathi Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited. (Pipelines Division)

Subedargunj, P.O. Pipalgaon, District : Allahabad, Pin-211012, State Uttar Pradesh.

SCHEDULE

Tehsil : Bhatpar Rani

District : Deoria

State : Uttar Pradesh

Mouja / Village

Survey/BlockNo.

Sub-Div-No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

Bankata Tirsen

43

00

04

14

(Bankata Chitrasen)

42

00

00

36

Tappa : Balivan

41

00

00

36

44

00

01

44

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4280

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

52 (Cart track)

00

00

90

36

00

10

26

35

00

00

36

37

00

05

58

38

00

12

60

39

00

06

30

BANKATA JAGDISH

395

00

01

31

Tappa : Balivan

391

00

10

44

392

00

00

36

390(CHAK ROAD)

00

01

08

389

00

09

72

387

00

00

36

386

00

00

57

327(ROAD)

00

04

14

308

00

00

36

309

00

01

80

310

00

07

56

311

00

04

32

313

00

04

14

312(CHAK ROAD)

00

01

08

297

00

15

66

296

00

12

96

279

00

03

24

280

00

14

04

281

00

05

76

282

00

00

36

283

00

00

36

215(CHAK ROAD)

00

01

08

240

00

11

34

237(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

20

236

00

07

02

235

00

05

04

233

00

02

52

231

00

02

34

230

00

03

78

229(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

72

227

00

00

66

228

00

06

12

225

00

05

58

224

00

00

36

223(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

72

220

00

08

82

218

00

00

36

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4281

219

00

08

46

121(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

54

120(ROAD)

00

00

72

24

00

05

22

23

00

00

36

25

00

00

70

26

00

00

36

27

00

00

36

22

00

05

40

19

00

05

04

17

00

05

22

18

00

05

58

115

00

00

36

39

00

00

36

29(NALA)

00

02

34

16

00

00

36

15

00

00

36

37

00

00

69

36

00

01

80

35

00

04

68

34

00

06

48

33

00

06

30

32

00

04

14

30

00

04

50

10

00

05

94

11(ROAD)

00

01

98

BHATHAHI SEVAK CHAK

415(ROAD)

00

01

58

399

00

04

16

Tappa : Balivan

398

00

08

60

396

00

01

70

397

00

18

18

386

00

08

95

387

00

00

81

385

00

10

85

383(ROAD)

00

02

83

277

00

02

20

276

00

07

31

275

00

10

84

274

00

02

20

272

00

06

16

273

00

01

19

271

00

02

37

278(CART TRACK)

00

01

39

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4282

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

284

00

01

19

283

00

02

39

282

00

01

19

281

00

08

77

279

00

08

73

269

00

01

19

267

00

05

08

265

00

01

19

266(CART TRACK)

00

02

21

225(CART TRACK)

00

01

19

30

00

13

16

24(CART TRACK)

00

01

55

22

00

04

32

29

00

01

19

21

00

00

81

20

00

10

93

19

00

06

39

18

00

08

42

17

00

10

85

16(CART TRACK)

00

04

37

BHATHRHI JAMIN

43

00

00

36

Tappa : Balivan

42

00

00

36

38

00

04

40

37

00

08

59

34

00

00

36

36

00

01

01

35

00

03

20

33

00

00

36

14

00

08

28

12

00

14

35

11

00

00

36

9

00

01

40

INDARWA

47(CART TRACK)

00

03

28

Tappa : Balivan

45

00

16

02

46

00

04

05

KISHORI CHHAPAR

328

00

13

13

Tappa : Balivan

325

00

03

15

320

00

01

22

321(CHAK ROAD)

00

03

20

324

00

02

70

322

00

08

34

319

00

05

13

318(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

65

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4283

313

00

00

36

314

00

17

54

315

00

01

20

308(CHAK ROAD)

00

01

01

303

00

22

34

302

00

10

47

301

00

01

17

300

00

03

14

299

00

06

98

RATSIYA

942

00

00

36

Tappa : Balivan

941

00

02

77

940

00

04

32

939

00

00

36

936(CART TRACK)

00

01

98

935

00

08

82

934

00

10

48

932(CHAK ROAD)

00

01

08

916

00

24

14

915

00

01

82

914

00

00

55

910

00

01

26

879(NALA)

00

02

47

911

00

01

36

856

00

00

36

857

00

03

51

871

00

01

26

867(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

61

863

00

05

28

864

00

05

83

865

00

07

04

866

00

00

68

862(CHAK ROAD)

00

01

12

861

00

17

51

860

00

00

63

821(ROAD)

00

03

06

820

00

20

59

809

00

00

36

814(CHAK ROAD)

00

02

34

713

00

11

47

726(CHAK ROAD)

00

01

08

727

00

04

43

728

00

05

40

729

00

10

53

730

00

06

66

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4284

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

731

00

04

88

732

00

05

83

733

00

05

85

735

00

07

54

736

00

03

33

753(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

90

754(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

90

777

00

00

36

776

00

00

56

775

00

06

32

773

00

04

97

772(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

63

771

00

10

98

770

00

04

21

769

00

05

26

768(CHAK ROAD)

00

01

19

767

00

05

76

764

00

04

82

763

00

02

76

PAKADIA KUND

243

00

06

59

Tappa : Balivan

220

00

02

16

151

00

00

14

150

00

00

36

152

00

01

66

153

00

03

31

154

00

02

74

168(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

90

169

00

04

55

170

00

03

24

171

00

03

38

172

00

03

53

173

00

03

46

176(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

90

177

00

02

81

178

00

04

05

186

00

12

64

188

00

04

81

189

00

06

05

194

00

00

36

195

00

02

15

196

00

04

97

197

00

02

60

199

00

00

36

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4285

204(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

44

201

00

02

35

206

00

00

36

200

00

23

62

100(BRICK ROAD)

00

00

90

25

00

05

63

22

00

04

59

21

00

06

80

20

00

03

08

18

00

03

49

17

00

02

16

16

00

01

50

15

00

00

36

SIKTIA NAYAK

1029(ROAD)

00

02

79

Tappa : Balivan

1088

00

03

87

1087

00

06

03

1086

00

07

33

1084

00

06

52

1083

00

06

62

1082

00

00

36

1081

00

00

36

1032(ROAD)

00

00

90

1025

00

17

56

1024

00

13

12

1020

00

01

91

1005(ROAD)

00

02

83

159

00

00

36

160

00

02

25

161

00

09

03

162

00

04

13

163

00

00

36

164

00

13

86

165

00

00

36

199(CHAK ROAD)

00

01

73

203

00

02

32

201

00

00

77

184

00

01

67

186

00

02

20

185

00

00

37

200

00

00

36

187

00

09

86

198

00

00

58

194(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

72

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4286

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

197

00

21

06

196

00

00

54

195

00

04

72

214

00

03

51

62

00

05

31

GAJ TADWA

681(RIVER)

00

12

89

Tappa : Gotma

700

00

00

36

699

00

05

69

698

00

00

36

697

00

00

36

701

00

09

42

696

00

12

70

695

00

00

99

693

00

00

36

692

00

07

94

691

00

03

79

690

00

00

44

689

00

04

57

688

00

01

19

687

00

10

41

685

00

01

34

684

00

00

36

665(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

67

646

00

01

56

645

00

04

03

634

00

00

94

633

00

05

10

631

00

05

37

630(CHAK ROAD)

00

01

11

629

00

07

07

601(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

81

581

00

04

02

580

00

00

52

582

00

11

38

584

00

07

90

585(CHAK ROAD)

00

01

13

586

00

12

76

589

00

00

36

579(ROAD)

00

02

58

573

00

00

36

574

00

11

56

575

00

03

92

576

00

00

36

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4287

572

00

03

43

571

00

01

94

577

00

00

36

565

00

04

11

564

00

04

03

563

00

03

54

562

00

02

56

559

00

01

93

558

00

05

97

556

00

12

33

551

00

00

36

550

00

04

68

548

00

05

15

549(ROAD)

00

00

36

578

00

00

48

ALIA CHAK

95

00

04

18

Tappa : Gotma

92

00

01

64

91

00

00

36

1(ROAD)

00

05

90

BATROULI

375(ROAD)

00

01

71

Tappa : Gotma

393

00

08

07

392(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

67

391

00

09

43

388

00

08

78

387

00

07

75

386

00

06

72

385

00

07

80

383(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

54

377

00

10

86

378

00

04

04

379

00

05

00

380

00

01

27

374(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

82

373

00

04

72

372

00

07

80

369

00

07

02

368

00

00

36

340(DRAIN)

00

02

16

444

00

00

36

445

00

07

32

446

00

12

26

449(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

65

339

00

17

69

338

00

00

36

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4288

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

336

00

22

71

327

00

00

36

334

00

05

79

328

00

00

42

333

00

03

53

332

00

05

88

306

00

03

17

304

00

11

74

236(ROAD)

00

01

08

235

00

01

16

PANDEPUR

17

00

15

23

Tappa : Gotma

16(CHAK ROAD)

00

01

70

15

00

01

67

12

00

04

92

11

00

04

11

10

00

17

73

TANDWA

479(ROAD)

00

00

92

Tappa : Gotma

477

00

01

04

476

00

12

24

468(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

81

377

00

11

70

375

00

11

52

374

00

02

46

373

00

05

33

372

00

00

36

371(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

90

370

00

12

60

365

00

05

69

364

00

08

21

363(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

72

356

00

01

44

355

00

09

70

357

00

03

20

358

00

03

52

353

00

08

96

352

00

02

70

351

00

05

26

345

00

02

72

344

00

01

89

CHHITOUNI

574(ROAD)

00

04

86

Tappa : Gotma

576

00

01

41

572

00

08

25

573

00

00

27

554(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

54

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4289

539

00

07

18

538

00

16

81

526

00

14

00

525(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

54

523

00

06

05

524

00

04

50

521

00

00

68

520

00

07

92

469(ROAD)

00

02

32

BALBHADRA CHAK

160(road)

00

00

81

Tappa : Gotma

103

00

00

45

104

00

05

70

102

00

00

65

101

00

00

69

100

00

00

69

99

00

00

31

98

00

04

22

97

00

03

97

96

00

03

33

94(chak road)

00

00

54

92

00

18

34

91

00

05

25

90

00

04

53

89

00

04

37

86

00

10

29

78(chak road)

00

00

59

87

00

00

36

75

00

19

85

76(chak road)

00

00

56

70

00

07

15

71

00

00

79

68

00

07

93

62

00

03

72

63(chak road)

00

00

63

58

00

03

14

59

00

00

36

57

00

03

18

56

00

03

34

55

00

03

42

54

00

08

53

53(cart track)

00

00

81

74(cart track)

00

01

06

BELDIHA

35(road)

00

01

84

Tappa : Gotma

32

00

34

17

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4290

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

33

00

01

45

31

00

03

77

30

00

01

09

29(chak road)

00

00

65

25

00

16

10

BARAIPAR PANDEY

911(road)

00

00

84

Tappa : Gotma

910

00

01

80

909

00

09

31

907

00

08

96

900

00

07

61

901

00

08

86

899

00

04

23

896

00

00

64

890

00

05

76

891

00

09

87

893(cart track)

00

00

72

463

00

05

23

465

00

15

05

464

00

00

36

466

00

10

18

453(cart track)

00

00

69

442

00

06

04

441

00

03

52

443

00

04

17

444

00

04

72

446

00

05

46

436(road)

00

00

55

431

00

03

29

430

00

08

52

429

00

08

68

427

00

00

84

418

00

02

59

425

00

08

80

419

00

01

75

424

00

03

88

423

00

02

53

421(nala)

00

02

65

420 (Nala)

00

00

35

PURAINA

114

00

13

00

Tappa : Gotma

113

00

03

47

116 (Nala)

00

00

36

117

00

00

36

110

00

09

79

115 (Chak Road)

00

00

36

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4291

119

00

00

36

109

00

10

24

75 (Road)

00

01

16

33

00

18

60

35

00

00

18

34

00

00

18

320 (Chak Road)

00

07

75

319

00

00

36

321

00

00

36

32

00

04

92

29

00

08

06

28

00

00

59

322

00

00

54

324

00

00

36

328

00

00

36

329

00

00

36

330

00

00

36

334

00

00

36

27

00

07

24

25

00

09

93

24

00

10

51

23

00

03

00

22

00

07

45

324 (Chak Road)

00

04

78

335

00

00

58

BAHLOLWA

244(NALA)

00

00

85

Tappa : Haweli

220

00

37

01

221

00

00

36

200(ROAD)

00

01

83

164

00

20

51

172

00

00

36

171

00

00

36

165(CHAK ROAD)

00

04

70

170

00

00

23

169

00

00

18

168

00

00

84

155

00

07

36

154

00

03

69

153

00

10

46

166

00

01

19

92(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

59

26

00

17

22

25

00

00

36

27

00

27

46

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4292

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

33

00

02

64

32

00

12

63

BHALI CHHAPARA

519

00

00

38

Tappa : Haweli

525

00

00

36

511

00

05

85

512

00

06

21

513

00

05

31

514

00

05

58

515

00

11

16

516

00

09

45

517

00

02

48

518

00

00

36

509

00

12

21

508

00

23

76

490(Chak Road)

00

00

63

468

00

07

02

469

00

15

12

462

00

07

92

460

00

00

63

470 (ROAD)

00

01

26

458

00

03

56

457

00

00

72

486

00

00

49

471

00

15

30

473 (CHAK ROAD)

00

00

63

302

00

09

36

304

00

11

16

305

00

07

47

353

00

11

62

354

00

03

74

358 (CHAK ROAD)

00

00

72

399(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

36

457

00

00

36

359

00

04

96

361

00

27

36

409(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

63

398

00

00

36

397(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

81

394

00

04

05

395

00

08

46

396

00

08

46

JOGAUR

116 (ROAD)

00

00

72

Tappa : Haweli

113

00

10

53

112

00

09

45

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4293

119 (CART TRACK)

00

00

63

109

00

11

16

126(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

63

82

00

21

69

76 (CHAK ROAD)

00

00

63

75

00

03

33

74

00

10

53

73

00

05

13

72

00

11

05

60

00

00

36

69 (CHAK ROAD)

00

00

36

54

00

00

36

53

00

00

36

62

00

00

36

71

00

16

69

70

00

05

67

50 (CHAK ROAD)

00

01

22

52

00

00

15

51

00

00

17

43

00

00

04

49

00

00

30

MADHOPUR(MADHOUR)

350

00

07

01

Tappa : Haweli

349

00

06

21

348

00

12

33

347

00

06

03

346

00

00

63

298 (Road)

00

01

55

344

00

03

69

341

00

07

45

340

00

06

30

328

00

06

30

326

00

01

84

325

00

03

17

324

00

08

06

323

00

07

81

308 (Chak Road)

00

00

59

312

00

08

53

313

00

00

36

311

00

18

50

92 (Chak Road)

00

00

59

87

00

08

59

86

00

07

04

85 (Chak Road)

00

00

59

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4294

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

81

00

12

19

82

00

07

76

80

00

08

09

78

00

00

36

79

00

03

69

99 (Chak Road)

00

02

44

97

00

00

28

98

00

01

71

96

00

00

36

100

00

03

11

70 (Chak Road)

00

00

61

35

00

18

18

39

00

00

36

38

00

14

04

37 (Chak Road)

00

00

68

JASUI

285

00

15

21

Tappa : Haweli

286 (Chak Road)

00

00

59

339

00

00

36

338

00

00

36

287

00

07

02

289

00

13

86

290 (Chak Road)

00

00

54

291

00

04

28

296

00

36

22

300

00

06

80

297

00

00

36

298

00

05

76

299

00

00

70

161 (Road)

00

03

69

120

00

00

36

117

00

00

36

110

00

01

43

111

00

06

00

112

00

01

43

108

00

23

58

107

00

10

20

106 (Chak Road)

00

01

82

96

00

04

41

37 (Road)

00

01

44

36

00

15

08

35

00

02

48

BISHUNPURA

341

00

05

76

Tappa : Haweli

340

00

06

48

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4295

339

00

03

76

202 (Road)

00

00

53

104

00

00

27

103

00

00

36

TENGRI

215

00

00

61

Tappa : Haweli

214

00

08

30

213

00

02

16

212

00

02

83

211

00

03

45

210

00

03

78

207

00

08

64

206

00

07

13

205

00

04

09

204

00

03

96

203 (Cart Track)

00

00

21

201

00

00

10

145 (Cart Track)

00

00

54

139

00

00

72

138

00

04

95

137 (Cart Track)

00

01

15

136

00

00

66

140

00

00

76

121

00

06

19

120

00

09

09

122

00

05

55

119

00

03

30

118

00

02

25

123

00

00

54

129/216 (Chak Road)

00

00

36

107

00

00

36

105

00

00

36

106

00

00

36

117

00

05

94

116

00

01

89

115

00

01

58

114

00

01

62

113

00

01

53

112

00

03

19

108

00

04

68

109

00

00

36

97 (Chak Road)

00

00

54

96

00

04

68

95

00

05

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4296

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

94

00

02

43

93

00

02

70

89

00

03

97

90

00

17

03

88

00

00

36

BARKA GAON

555 (CHAK ROAD)

00

00

59

Tappa : Haweli

556

00

09

68

557

00

11

07

558

00

03

80

560

00

14

51

562

00

02

30

561

00

19

64

569

00

23

52

570 (CHAK ROAD)

00

03

36

581

00

03

13

582

00

05

96

568

00

01

35

594 (ROAD)

00

00

63

623

00

13

86

622

00

00

36

624

00

11

76

621

00

00

36

620

00

02

88

625

00

05

22

619

00

03

41

618

00

10

88

627

00

00

66

628

00

00

36

629 (CART TRACK)

00

01

17

637

00

07

38

638

00

08

28

636

00

00

36

639

00

04

90

640

00

04

18

641

00

06

57

642

00

04

14

643

00

13

77

56 (CHAK ROAD)

00

00

63

669

00

15

12

670

00

00

36

668

00

02

36

674

00

07

88

673

00

00

56

672 (ROAD)

00

02

25

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4297

691

00

00

36

682

00

13

45

683

00

00

36

692

00

03

29

681 (CHAK ROAD)

00

01

50

680

00

03

86

712

00

07

92

711 (CHAK ROAD)

00

00

63

710

00

09

72

709

00

00

36

727

00

05

58

728

00

01

83

729

00

01

33

706

00

12

89

705

00

00

36

755

00

15

16

756

00

04

32

757

00

05

18

758

00

04

81

759

00

01

09

871

00

00

36

873 (CART TRACK)

00

07

74

936

00

00

93

938

00

05

55

941

00

00

50

942

00

00

36

939

00

00

63

940

00

04

01

944

00

04

64

945

00

04

16

947

00

02

81

950

00

04

03

955 (CHAK ROAD)

00

00

60

954

00

01

08

949

00

00

72

951

00

04

98

962

00

02

56

PIPRA BITHAL

914

00

01

43

Tappa : Ghati

913

00

00

36

912

00

00

36

911

00

00

36

LAL CHAK

334

00

08

46

Tappa : Ghati

333

00

01

47

332

00

00

36

329

00

09

59

328

00

06

48

326

00

03

72

327

00

13

05

322

00

00

36

324

00

03

44

323

00

04

11

280

00

13

23

308

00

08

00

307

00

00

36

294

00

02

76

303

00

02

88

304

00

00

36

302

00

03

82

301

00

03

78

149-339 (CHAK ROAD)

00

00

67

147

00

00

36

149

00

16

56

152

00

16

20

154 (CHAK ROAD)

00

01

04

159

00

00

26

160

00

04

07

161

00

01

13

153 (CHAK ROAD)

00

00

90

110

00

07

74

106 (CHAK ROAD)

00

00

63

105

00

13

73

104 (CHAK ROAD)

00

00

63

68

00

00

36

94

00

06

48

93/337

00

00

56

69 (CHAK ROAD)

00

01

23

93

00

00

67

50

00

02

02

49

00

06

90

45

00

03

96

44

00

04

18

43

00

05

35

38

00

11

02

[F. No. R-25011/23/2013-OR-I]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

4298

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

ubZ fnYyh] 5 vxLr] 2013

dk-vk-

1624-—dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slk izrhr gksrk gS fd yksd fgr esa ;g vko';d gS fd floku ls cSsrkyiqj rd isVªksfy;e

inkFkks± ds ifjogu gsrq rglhy % lkyseiqj] ftyk % nsofj;k] jkT; mÙkj izns'k esa bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbiykbu fcNkbZ

tkuh pkfg,_

vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slh ikbiykbu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, vko';d izrhr gksrk gS fd ml Hkwfe esa ftlds Hkhrj mDr

ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkus dk izLrko gS vkSj tks bl vf/lwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa o£.kr gS] mi;ksx dk vtZu fd;k tk, A

vr% vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbUl (Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/dkj dk vtZu) vf/fu;e] 1962 (1962

dk 50) dh /kjk 3 dh mi&/kjk (1) }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] mDr Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/dkj dk vtZu djus ds vius

vk'k; dh ?kks"k.kk djrh gS_

dksbZ O;fDr] tks mDr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa fgrc¼ gS] ml rkjh[k ls ftldks] Hkkjr ds jkti=k esa ;Fkk izdkf'kr bl

vfèklwpuk dh izfr;ka lk/kj.k turk dks miyC/ djk nh tkrh gSa] bDdhl fnu ds vUnj] Hkwfe ds Hkhrj ikbiykbu fcNk, tkus gsrq mi;ksx

ds vf/dkj ds vtZu ds fy,] Jh mekdkar f=kikBh] l{ke izkf/dkjh] bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM] (ikbiykbu fMohtu)] lqcsnkjxat]

iks-vks- % ihiyxk¡o] ftyk % bykgkckn] fiu&211012] jkT; % mÙkj izns'k dks fyf[kr :i eas vk{ksi Hkst ldsxkA

vuqlwph

rglhy % lkyseiqj

ftyk nsofj;k

jkT; % mÙkj izns'k

ekStk@xzke

losZ@Cykd@la- (IykWV la-)

lc&Mho&la-

{ks=kiQy

gsDVs;j

vkjs

oxZ ehVj

1

2

3

4

5

6

nkukSj

1066

00

16

56

rIik % HkkVuh

1065

00

00

54

1067

00

04

23

1076

00

00

36

1075

00

04

23

1074

00

00

36

1073

00

00

36

1084

00

00

36

1080

00

00

36

1087

00

00

36

1078

00

16

74

1079

00

08

37

964

00

07

38

1077

00

00

36

965

00

13

31

963

00

00

69

962

00

06

66

961

00

02

66

960

00

00

36

966

00

00

36

885 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

76

878

00

00

74

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4299

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4300

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

876

00

06

48

875

00

05

76

874

00

18

54

870¼pdjksM½

00

00

77

864¼pdjksM½

00

00

36

861

00

00

36

866

00

09

27

865

00

11

70

855

00

03

28

854

00

04

52

852

00

06

25

851

00

00

36

848¼pdjksM½

00

00

63

846

00

06

57

845

00

07

18

844

00

13

32

843

00

05

02

842

00

04

68

835

00

08

46

836

00

07

20

834

00

00

36

833¼pdjksM½

00

00

63

832

00

14

58

829

00

00

37

828

00

00

36

lojsth

1245

00

00

36

rIik % HkkVuh

1242

00

00

38

1241

00

03

71

1238

00

18

03

1237¼pdjksM½

00

00

68

1234

00

09

25

1232

00

00

36

1226

00

01

54

1225

00

00

59

1224

00

04

95

1227

00

00

52

1223

00

02

02

1221

00

03

36

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4301

1222

00

08

39

1163

00

09

41

1162

00

00

62

1161

00

17

22

1159

00

03

95

1157

00

00

87

1153

00

00

36

1158

00

02

41

1149

00

02

58

1152

00

02

95

1151

00

00

36

1150

00

06

58

1146

00

02

11

1145 ¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

00

52

1143

00

05

48

1142

00

03

27

1139

00

07

19

1140

00

02

60

1102

00

08

92

1103

00

17

04

1101

00

00

88

919 ¼jkLrk½

00

01

50

542

00

00

36

528

00

10

45

530

00

04

58

581

00

18

74

537

00

00

36

531

00

00

36

536

00

02

78

532

00

07

05

535

00

01

17

533

00

14

10

521

00

01

61

520

00

10

24

519

00

00

67

500

00

02

69

496 ¼pdjksM½

00

01

25

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4302

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

467

00

00

27

462 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

17

460

00

06

85

461

00

00

91

459

00

10

51

458

00

02

67

453

00

04

71

454

00

08

08

451

00

03

79

450

00

00

90

446

00

00

36

445 ¼jkLrk½

00

00

74

414

00

21

89

412

00

06

04

411

00

03

25

410

00

02

87

302 ¼pdjksM½

00

01

21

106

00

01

72

105

00

00

36

107

00

00

36

77

00

11

55

75

00

00

36

78@1606

00

02

71

76

00

04

92

78

00

18

72

73 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

69

78@1623

00

00

36

60

00

01

60

61

00

00

36

62

00

06

57

63

00

00

36

65

00

01

40

64

00

00

36

66

00

08

06

48

00

00

36

47

00

10

59

44 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

60

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4303

30

00

05

01

29

00

02

27

28

00

03

62

Hkjgs pkSjk

1309 ¼pdjksM½

00

01

03

rIik % ?kkVh

1305

00

00

90

1303

00

15

50

1300

00

07

39

1299

00

00

11

1301

00

02

17

1288

00

00

36

1290

00

05

89

1289

00

09

34

1285

00

00

36

1284

00

08

26

1283

00

06

68

1282 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

99

1278

00

03

15

1279 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

72

1281

00

02

67

1280

00

05

55

1274 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

68

350

00

00

28

351

00

07

24

353

00

14

07

352

00

03

97

354 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

90

359

00

02

95

355

00

11

03

356

00

03

35

345 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

75

344

00

06

11

341 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

74

340

00

06

49

333

00

05

21

316 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

53

204

00

00

36

203

00

11

74

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4304

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

202

00

00

55

pUnkSyh

87 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

59

rIik % ?kkVh

83

00

14

96

59

00

03

44

82 v

00

09

02

81

00

00

36

80

00

03

65

79

00

00

69

98 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

44

77

00

04

04

78

00

14

72

71 c

00

01

47

71 v

00

00

36

69 c

00

12

50

69 v

00

00

36

43 ¼jkLrk½

00

00

77

6

00

19

79

3

00

12

10

4

00

00

99

1 c

00

04

98

1 v

00

12

64

mldk

1021

00

01

98

rIik % ?kkVh

1020

00

10

08

1019

00

02

35

1018

00

12

60

1017

00

00

36

996 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

90

993

00

07

02

997

00

01

44

985 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

42

983

00

17

64

984

00

37

31

979 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

72

894

00

00

36

902

00

03

51

909

00

00

36

901

00

10

26

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4305

910

00

00

36

872

00

04

86

870

00

12

60

871

00

00

54

868

00

08

59

867

00

10

24

866

00

10

80

864

00

10

08

cgsjk Mkcsj

615

00

07

25

rIik % ?kkVh

613

00

10

93

610

00

01

54

609

00

00

36

611

00

08

89

607 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

72

546

00

20

34

557

00

02

31

556

00

01

93

555

00

09

77

560

00

00

64

554

00

13

18

553

00

02

68

542 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

54

521

00

02

28

522

00

00

36

520

00

06

97

519

00

00

19

518

00

01

84

517

00

02

50

515

00

10

98

516

00

03

16

514

00

06

48

512

00

13

36

508

00

13

70

507

00

00

36

rsuqvk

305

00

01

19

rIik % ?kkVh

304

00

06

96

303

00

02

95

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4306

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

302

00

07

83

301

00

03

96

300

00

02

10

284 ¼jksM½

00

00

71

283

00

00

36

282

00

06

70

281

00

04

95

280

00

09

83

279

00

02

58

267 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

58

258

00

06

21

256

00

00

36

259

00

04

10

261

00

01

20

262

00

05

64

263

00

19

80

228

00

05

72

227

00

07

08

226

00

07

02

225

00

03

50

218

00

01

30

224

00

01

74

223

00

04

88

222

00

00

41

220

00

03

29

221

00

03

24

3

00

02

88

thKk nh{khr

599 ¼jksM½

00

00

67

rIik % ?kkVh

600

00

06

15

598 ¼pdjksM½

00

01

15

597

00

19

01

596

00

18

45

595

00

02

38

568 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

67

560

00

01

15

559

00

09

04

553 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

65

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4307

551

00

07

31

550

00

04

81

548 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

63

482

00

04

59

483

00

09

99

479

00

05

49

478 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

63

476

00

00

36

475

00

15

39

472 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

63

466

00

18

95

463 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

72

462

00

11

65

455

00

19

35

454

00

04

88

453

00

00

36

339 ¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

01

55

328

00

00

36

327

00

13

82

326

00

19

35

325

00

00

36

ehJkSyh nh{khr

1055

00

13

59

rIik % ?kkVh

1058

00

08

89

1061

00

05

96

1062

00

05

54

1064

00

07

31

1065

00

02

25

1066

00

00

81

1025 ¼jksM½

00

05

76

1010&1239

00

01

16

1010&1238

00

00

99

1010&1240

00

04

65

1007 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

53

1005

00

02

85

1006

00

06

49

1004

00

03

78

985 ¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

02

70

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4308

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

903

00

07

74

904

00

00

36

908

00

06

88

909

00

00

36

913

00

07

06

910

00

03

23

912

00

06

56

918

00

00

36

919

00

04

38

911

00

03

96

595

00

03

82

920

00

00

36

420&1232 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

63

420

00

23

29

419

00

01

43

421

00

05

72

422 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

70

423

00

06

00

424

00

12

35

427 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

63

431

00

15

48

430

00

00

41

435

00

17

64

437 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

54

441

00

06

45

442

00

07

89

446

00

07

38

447 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

63

457

00

17

28

459

00

05

72

460

00

00

44

461

00

00

36

ehJkSyh cSn

67

00

01

08

rIik % ?kkVh

73

00

00

27

69

00

10

21

68

00

14

85

70

00

00

30

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4309

67 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

72

64

00

11

75

65

00

00

43

63

00

05

89

NksVh xand unh

00

02

75

chjlhaxiwj

67 ¼unh½

00

13

23

rIik % cjlhikj

68

00

04

50

87

00

02

16

91

00

01

23

90

00

02

95

89

00

05

31

88

00

01

87

85

00

00

18

83

00

00

54

92

00

00

36

82

00

31

14

80 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

36

79

00

00

36

81

00

14

09

47 ¼jksM½

00

00

67

42

00

15

93

44 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

90

24

00

13

77

27

00

14

87

28

00

05

47

14

00

22

32

11 ¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

00

63

10 ¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

00

63

5

00

22

32

3

00

04

41

2

00

22

32

ijlkSuh

96

00

00

41

rIik % cjlhikj

95

00

12

42

thjklks

395

00

01

26

rIik % cjlhikj

396

00

07

00

397

00

00

36

394

00

06

27

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4310

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

393

00

12

24

388 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

54

377

00

18

81

378 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

54

366

00

10

30

369

00

02

00

367

00

00

36

368

00

11

29

358 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

72

350

00

07

58

343 ¼pdjksM½

00

01

03

334

00

00

82

339

00

14

58

340 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

63

342

00

00

58

341

00

14

58

103 ¼jksM½

00

00

72

69

00

07

02

63

00

13

86

62

00

22

68

49

00

17

82

44

00

07

06

43

00

05

40

42

00

03

12

ihijk nsojkt

142

00

00

68

rIik % cjlhikj

141

00

06

12

136

00

07

56

135

00

08

64

134

00

07

83

133

00

07

92

132 ¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

00

54

102

00

13

59

103

00

05

76

115

00

00

36

104

00

04

80

106 ¼pdjksM½

00

01

30

105

00

00

96

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4311

107

00

09

02

108

00

00

36

pdjksM

00

00

54

94

00

16

20

91

00

00

86

90

00

19

98

pdjksM

00

00

54

pdjksM

00

00

54

69

00

05

49

68

00

02

52

67

00

00

36

62

00

09

57

63

00

05

83

60 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

82

59

00

09

00

68 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

81

clnso pd

128 ¼jksM½

00

01

13

rIik % lkFkh;ko

126

00

00

36

109

00

08

82

108

00

00

96

110

00

06

57

111

00

00

84

112

00

00

36

113

00

05

94

114

00

03

06

115

00

02

22

116

00

00

36

107 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

98

105

00

01

53

106

00

01

54

97 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

45

91

00

06

15

90

00

00

36

92

00

02

55

93

00

03

70

94

00

03

33

95

00

00

36

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4312

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

12 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

63

11 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

63

55

00

04

05

54 ¼pdjksM½

00

01

19

56

00

00

36

53

00

07

97

52

00

02

04

49

00

01

53

50

00

06

56

47

00

03

28

46

00

03

15

45

00

06

30

44 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

36

43 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

36

veok

463 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

62

rIik % lkFkh;ko

464

00

01

83

462

00

08

37

461

00

12

60

458 ¼pdjksM½

00

01

26

455

00

02

70

452

00

03

42

453

00

02

01

451

00

09

00

449

00

25

11

448

00

08

19

447

00

09

36

446 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

54

445

00

04

27

443

00

05

31

442

00

00

36

440

00

14

72

441

00

01

72

439

00

01

53

433 ¼dsuky½

00

06

48

259

00

03

87

258

00

16

02

256

00

01

45

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4313

255

00

00

36

248

00

00

36

109 ¼pdjksM½

00

01

08

510 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

36

110

00

14

58

108

00

14

18

107 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

54

87

00

05

94

89

00

02

72

90

00

00

36

88

00

04

14

92

00

00

36

86

00

11

70

85

00

01

02

84

00

00

36

83 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

54

82

00

15

03

80

00

07

92

79

00

12

24

76

00

16

20

47 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

45

75

00

00

36

39

00

00

36

25 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

54

24

00

05

04

23

00

04

50

22

00

02

70

38

00

00

36

20

00

21

96

21

00

02

16

19 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

54

2

00

00

36

1

00

14

31

ihijk lqdyk

293

00

01

11

rIik % lkFkh;ko

292 ¼pdjksM½

00

01

89

290

00

16

92

291

00

00

36

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4314

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

287

00

08

03

288

00

00

36

286

00

09

81

257 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

81

248

00

41

40

247 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

34

244

00

00

36

207 ¼jksM½

00

01

66

122 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

59

121

00

19

44

113 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

63

83

00

03

36

82

00

24

32

81

00

00

36

78

00

00

36

79 ¼pdjksM½

00

02

43

74

00

06

50

72

00

32

85

88 ¼ukyk½

00

01

98

vpkSyk

292

00

05

63

rIik % lkFkh;ko

293

00

05

02

302 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

42

303

00

03

15

291 ¼pdjksM½

00

01

10

266

00

00

36

267

00

01

24

268 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

34

273

00

13

77

271

00

04

25

272

00

05

39

270

00

05

28

276

00

09

00

250 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

72

233

00

00

36

231

00

05

55

232

00

00

36

230

00

04

68

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4315

229

00

00

83

228

00

02

52

227

00

02

10

226

00

00

36

ijklh;k djdkFkh

477 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

72

rIik % lkFkh;ko

490

00

03

51

489

00

09

00

488 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

81

487

00

01

24

486

00

10

62

485 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

81

481

00

00

49

483 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

36

484

00

11

70

499 ¼dsuky½

00

14

58

838

00

04

72

833

00

10

71

834

00

00

36

830

00

00

36

832

00

18

18

835

00

11

88

826

00

00

60

825 ¼jksM½

00

00

90

629

00

06

30

511 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

72

510

00

01

19

508

00

02

32

509

00

07

02

507

00

10

26

506&909

00

08

64

825 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

66

506

00

06

02

505

00

01

36

504

00

01

28

444

00

00

39

443

00

00

36

442

00

09

35

441

00

06

30

440

00

12

06

439

00

01

71

438

00

00

36

437 ¼jksM½

00

01

17

436 ¼jksM½

00

02

43

46

00

00

36

45

00

06

48

44 ¼jksM½

00

01

03

43

00

13

05

42

00

00

88

40 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

91

41

00

04

52

37

00

04

50

36

00

09

96

34 ¼pdjksM½

00

00

49

33

00

02

87

¹iQk- la- vkj&25011@23@2013&vksvkj&Iº

iou oqQekj] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 5th August, 2013

S.O. 1624.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest

that a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited in Tehsil Salempur, Dist. Deoria in the State

of Uttar Pradesh for ‘Siwan to Baitalpur Pipeline’ for the transportation of Petroleum Product;

And, whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary

to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which is described

in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals

Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares

its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on

which the copies of the notification issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the

Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user

therein for laying of the pipeline under the land, to Shri Umakant Tripathi B.A.S. & Competent Authority, Indian

Oil Corporation Limited. (Pipelines Division), Subedargunj, P.O: Pipalgaon, District: Allahabad, Pin – 211012,

State: Uttar Pradesh.

4316

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

SCHEDULE

Tehsil : Salempur

Dist. : Deoria

State : Uttar Pradesh

Mouja / Village

Survey/BlockNo.

Sub-Div-No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

DANAUR

1066

00

16

56

Tappa : Bhatni

1065

00

00

54

1067

00

04

23

1076

00

00

36

1075

00

04

23

1074

00

00

36

1073

00

00

36

1084

00

00

36

1080

00

00

36

1087

00

00

36

1078

00

16

74

1079

00

08

37

964

00

07

38

1077

00

00

36

965

00

13

31

963

00

00

69

962

00

06

66

961

00

02

66

960

00

00

36

966

00

00

36

885(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

76

878

00

00

74

876

00

06

48

875

00

05

76

874

00

18

54

870(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

77

864(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

36

861

00

00

36

866

00

09

27

865

00

11

70

855

00

03

28

854

00

04

52

852

00

06

25

851

00

00

36

848(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

63

846

00

06

57

845

00

07

18

844

00

13

32

843

00

05

02

842

00

04

68

835

00

08

46

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4317

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4318

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

836

00

07

20

834

00

00

36

833(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

63

832

00

14

58

829

00

00

37

828

00

00

36

SAVREJI

1245

00

00

36

Tappa : Bhatni

1242

00

00

38

1241

00

03

71

1238

00

18

03

1237(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

68

1234

00

09

25

1232

00

00

36

1226

00

01

54

1225

00

00

59

1224

00

04

95

1227

00

00

52

1223

00

02

02

1221

00

03

36

1222

00

08

39

1163

00

09

41

1162

00

00

62

1161

00

17

22

1159

00

03

95

1157

00

00

87

1153

00

00

36

1158

00

02

41

1149

00

02

58

1152

00

02

95

1151

00

00

36

1150

00

06

58

1146

00

02

11

1145(CART TRACK)

00

00

52

1143

00

05

48

1142

00

03

27

1139

00

07

19

1140

00

02

60

1102

00

08

92

1103

00

17

04

1101

00

00

88

919(ROAD)

00

01

50

542

00

00

36

528

00

10

45

530

00

04

58

581

00

18

74

537

00

00

36

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4319

531

00

00

36

536

00

02

78

532

00

07

05

535

00

01

17

533

00

14

10

521

00

01

61

520

00

10

24

519

00

00

67

500

00

02

69

496(CHAK ROAD)

00

01

25

467

00

00

27

462(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

17

460

00

06

85

461

00

00

91

459

00

10

51

458

00

02

67

453

00

04

71

454

00

08

08

451

00

03

79

450

00

00

90

446

00

00

36

445(ROAD)

00

00

74

414

00

21

89

412

00

06

04

411

00

03

25

410

00

02

87

302(CHAK ROAD)

00

01

21

106

00

01

72

105

00

00

36

107

00

00

36

77

00

11

55

75

00

00

36

78/1606

00

02

71

76

00

04

92

78

00

18

72

73(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

69

78/1623

00

00

36

60

00

01

60

61

00

00

36

62

00

06

57

63

00

00

36

65

00

01

40

64

00

00

36

66

00

08

06

48

00

00

36

47

00

10

59

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4320

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

44(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

60

30

00

05

01

29

00

02

27

28

00

03

62

BHARHE

1309 (CHAK ROAD)

00

01

03

CHOURA

1305

00

00

90

Tappa : Ghati

1303

00

15

50

1300

00

07

39

1299

00

00

11

1301

00

02

17

1288

00

00

36

1290

00

05

89

1289

00

09

34

1285

00

00

36

1284

00

08

26

1283

00

06

68

1282(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

99

1278

00

03

15

1279(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

72

1281

00

02

67

1280

00

05

55

1274(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

68

350

00

00

28

351

00

07

24

353

00

14

07

352

00

03

97

354(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

90

359

00

02

95

355

00

11

03

356

00

03

35

345(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

75

344

00

06

11

341(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

74

340

00

06

49

333

00

05

21

316(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

53

204

00

00

36

203

00

11

74

202

00

00

55

CHANDOULI

87(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

59

Tappa : Ghati

83

00

14

96

59

00

03

44

82A

00

09

02

81

00

00

36

80

00

03

65

79

00

00

69

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4321

98(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

44

77

00

04

04

78

00

14

72

71B

00

01

47

71A

00

00

36

69B

00

12

50

69A

00

00

36

43(ROAD)

00

00

77

6

00

19

79

3

00

12

10

4

00

00

99

1B

00

04

98

1A

00

12

64

USKA

1021

00

01

98

Tappa : Ghati

1020

00

10

08

1019

00

02

35

1018

00

12

60

1017

00

00

36

996(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

90

993

00

07

02

997

00

01

44

985(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

42

983

00

17

64

984

00

37

31

979(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

72

894

00

00

36

902

00

03

51

909

00

00

36

901

00

10

26

910

00

00

36

872

00

04

86

870

00

12

60

871

00

00

54

868

00

08

59

867

00

10

24

866

00

10

80

864

00

10

08

BEHRA DABER

615

00

07

25

Tappa : Ghati

613

00

10

93

610

00

01

54

609

00

00

36

611

00

08

89

607(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

72

546

00

20

34

557

00

02

31

556

00

01

93

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4322

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

555

00

09

77

560

00

00

64

554

00

13

18

553

00

02

68

542(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

54

521

00

02

28

522

00

00

36

520

00

06

97

519

00

00

19

518

00

01

84

517

00

02

50

515

00

10

98

516

00

03

16

514

00

06

48

512

00

13

36

508

00

13

70

507

00

00

36

TENUA

305

00

01

19

Tappa : Ghati

304

00

06

96

303

00

02

95

302

00

07

83

301

00

03

96

300

00

02

10

284(ROAD)

00

00

71

283

00

00

36

282

00

06

70

281

00

04

95

280

00

09

83

279

00

02

58

267(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

58

258

00

06

21

256

00

00

36

259

00

04

10

261

00

01

20

262

00

05

64

263

00

19

80

228

00

05

72

227

00

07

08

226

00

07

02

225

00

03

50

218

00

01

30

224

00

01

74

223

00

04

88

222

00

00

41

220

00

03

29

221

00

03

24

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4323

3

00

02

88

JIGNA DIKSIT

599(ROAD)

00

00

67

Tappa : Ghati

600

00

06

15

598(CHAK ROAD)

00

01

15

597

00

19

01

596

00

18

45

595

00

02

38

568(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

67

560

00

01

15

559

00

09

04

553(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

65

551

00

07

31

550

00

04

81

548(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

63

482

00

04

59

483

00

09

99

479

00

05

49

478(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

63

476

00

00

36

475

00

15

39

472(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

63

466

00

18

95

463(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

72

462

00

11

65

455

00

19

35

454

00

04

88

453

00

00

36

339(CART TRAK)

00

01

55

328

00

00

36

327

00

13

82

326

00

19

35

325

00

00

36

MISHROULI DIKSIT Tappa : Ghati

1055

00

13

59

1058

00

08

89

1061

00

05

96

1062

00

05

54

1064

00

07

31

1065

00

02

25

1066

00

00

81

1025(ROAD)

00

05

76

1010-1239

00

01

16

1010-1238

00

00

99

1010-1240

00

04

65

1007(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

53

1005

00

02

85

1006

00

06

49

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4324

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1004

00

03

78

985(CART TRACK)

00

02

70

903

00

07

74

904

00

00

36

908

00

06

88

909

00

00

36

913

00

07

06

910

00

03

23

912

00

06

56

918

00

00

36

919

00

04

38

911

00

03

96

595

00

03

82

920

00

00

36

420-1232(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

63

420

00

23

29

419

00

01

43

421

00

05

72

422(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

70

423

00

06

00

424

00

12

35

427(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

63

431

00

15

48

430

00

00

41

435

00

17

64

437(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

54

441

00

06

45

442

00

07

89

446

00

07

38

447(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

63

457

00

17

28

459

00

05

72

460

00

00

44

461

00

00

36

MISHROULI BAID Tappa : Ghati

67

00

01

08

73

00

00

27

69

00

10

21

68

00

14

85

70

00

00

30

67(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

72

64

00

11

75

65

00

00

43

63

00

05

89

CHHOTI GANDAK RIVER

00

02

75

BIRSINGHPUR

67(RIVER)

00

13

23

Tappa:Barsipar

68

00

04

50

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4325

87

00

02

16

91

00

01

23

90

00

02

95

89

00

05

31

88

00

01

87

85

00

00

18

83

00

00

54

92

00

00

36

82

00

31

14

80(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

36

79

00

00

36

81

00

14

09

47(ROAD)

00

00

67

42

00

15

93

44(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

90

24

00

13

77

27

00

14

87

28

00

05

47

14

00

22

32

11(CART TRACK)

00

00

63

10(CART TRACK)

00

00

63

5

00

22

32

3

00

04

41

2

00

22

32

PARSOUNI

96

00

00

41

Tappa:Barsipar

95

00

12

42

JIRASO

395

00

01

26

Tappa:Barsipar

396

00

07

00

397

00

00

36

394

00

06

27

393

00

12

24

388(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

54

377

00

18

81

378(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

54

366

00

10

30

369

00

02

00

367

00

00

36

368

00

11

29

358(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

72

350

00

07

58

343(CHAK ROAD)

00

01

03

334

00

00

82

339

00

14

58

340(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

63

342

00

00

58

341

00

14

58

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4326

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

103(ROAD)

00

00

72

69

00

07

02

63

00

13

86

62

00

22

68

49

00

17

82

44

00

07

06

43

00

05

40

42

00

03

12

PIPARA DEVRAJ

142

00

00

68

141

00

06

12

Tappa:Barsipar

136

00

07

56

135

00

08

64

134

00

07

83

133

00

07

92

132(CART TRACK)

00

00

54

102

00

13

59

103

00

05

76

115

00

00

36

104

00

04

80

106(CHAK ROAD)

00

01

30

105

00

00

96

107

00

09

02

108

00

00

36

CHAK ROAD

00

00

54

94

00

16

20

91

00

00

86

90

00

19

98

CHAK ROAD

00

00

54

CHAK ROAD

00

00

54

69

00

05

49

68

00

02

52

67

00

00

36

62

00

09

57

63

00

05

83

60(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

82

59

00

09

00

68(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

81

BASDEV CHAK

128(ROAD)

00

01

13

Tappa:

126

00

00

36

Sathiyav

109

00

08

82

108

00

00

96

110

00

06

57

111

00

00

84

112

00

00

36

113

00

05

94

114

00

03

06

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4327

115

00

02

22

116

00

00

36

107(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

98

105

00

01

53

106

00

01

54

97(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

45

91

00

06

15

90

00

00

36

92

00

02

55

93

00

03

70

94

00

03

33

95

00

00

36

12(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

63

11(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

63

55

00

04

05

54(CHAK ROAD)

00

01

19

56

00

00

36

53

00

07

97

52

00

02

04

49

00

01

53

50

00

06

56

47

00

03

28

46

00

03

15

45

00

06

30

44(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

36

43(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

36

AMUVA

463(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

62

Tappa:

464

00

01

83

Sathiyav

462

00

08

37

461

00

12

60

458(CHAK ROAD)

00

01

26

455

00

02

70

452

00

03

42

453

00

02

01

451

00

09

00

449

00

25

11

448

00

08

19

447

00

09

36

446(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

54

445

00

04

27

443

00

05

31

442

00

00

36

440

00

14

72

441

00

01

72

439

00

01

53

433(CANAL)

00

06

48

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4328

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

259

00

03

87

258

00

16

02

256

00

01

45

255

00

00

36

248

00

00

36

109(CHAK ROAD)

00

01

08

510(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

36

110

00

14

58

108

00

14

18

107(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

54

87

00

05

94

89

00

02

72

90

00

00

36

88

00

04

14

92

00

00

36

86

00

11

70

85

00

01

02

84

00

00

36

83(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

54

82

00

15

03

80

00

07

92

79

00

12

24

76

00

16

20

47(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

45

75

00

00

36

39

00

00

36

25(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

54

24

00

05

04

23

00

04

50

22

00

02

70

38

00

00

36

20

00

21

96

21

00

02

16

19(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

54

2

00

00

36

1

00

14

31

PIPRA

293

00

01

11

SHUKLA

292(CHAK ROAD)

00

01

89

Tappa:

290

00

16

92

Sathiyav

291

00

00

36

287

00

08

03

288

00

00

36

286

00

09

81

257(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

81

248

00

41

40

247(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

34

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4329

244

00

00

36

207(ROAD)

00

01

66

122(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

59

121

00

19

44

113(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

63

83

00

03

36

82

00

24

32

81

00

00

36

78

00

00

36

79(CHAK ROAD)

00

02

43

74

00

06

50

72

00

32

85

88(NALA)

00

01

98

ACHAULA

292

00

05

63

Tappa:

293

00

05

02

Sathiyav

302(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

42

303

00

03

15

291(CHAK ROAD)

00

01

10

266

00

00

36

267

00

01

24

268(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

34

273

00

13

77

271

00

04

25

272

00

05

39

270

00

05

28

276

00

09

00

250(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

72

233

00

00

36

231

00

05

55

232

00

00

36

230

00

04

68

229

00

00

83

228

00

02

52

227

00

02

10

226

00

00

36

PARASIA

477(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

72

KARAKATHI

490

00

03

51

Tappa:

489

00

09

00

Sathiyav

488(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

81

487

00

01

24

486

00

10

62

485(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

81

481

00

00

49

483(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

36

484

00

11

70

499(CANAL)

00

14

58

838

00

04

72

833

00

10

71

834

00

00

36

830

00

00

36

832

00

18

18

835

00

11

88

826

00

00

60

825(ROAD)

00

00

90

629

00

06

30

511(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

72

510

00

01

19

508

00

02

32

509

00

07

02

507

00

10

26

506-909

00

08

64

825(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

66

506

00

06

02

505

00

01

36

504

00

01

28

444

00

00

39

443

00

00

36

442

00

09

35

441

00

06

30

440

00

12

06

439

00

01

71

438

00

00

36

437(ROAD)

00

01

17

436(ROAD)

00

02

43

46

00

00

36

45

00

06

48

44(ROAD)

00

01

03

43

00

13

05

42

00

00

88

40(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

91

41

00

04

52

37

00

04

50

36

00

09

96

34(CHAK ROAD)

00

00

49

33

00

02

87

[F. No. R-25011/23/2013-OR-I]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

4330

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

ubZ fnYyh] 5 vxLr] 2013

dk-vk-

1625-—dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slk izrhr gksrk gS fd yksd fgr esa ;g vko”;d gS fd iVuk ls eksfrgkjh vkSj csrkyiqj

rd isVªksfy;e inkFkks± ds ifjogu gsrq ftyk floku] jkT; fcgkj esa bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkuh

pkfg, A

vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slh ikbiykbu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, vko”;d izrhr gksrk gS fd ml Hkwfe esa ftlds Hkhrj

mDr ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkus dk izLrko gS vkSj tks bl vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa of.kZr gS] mi;ksx dk vtZu fd;k tk,(

vr%] vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbUl ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½ vf/kfu;e] 1962 ¼1962

dk 50½ dh /kkjk 3 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk iznÙk “kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] mDr Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/akdkj dk vtZu djus ds vius

vk”k; dh ?kks’k.kk djrh gS(

dksbZ O;fDr] tks mDr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa fgrc) gS] ml rkjh[k ls ftldks] Hkkjr ds jkti= esa ;Fkk izdkf”kr bl

vf/klwpuk dh izfr;ka lk/kkj.k turk dks miyC/k djk nh tkrh gaS] bDdhl fnu ds vUnj] Hkwfe ds Hkhrj ikbiykbu fcNk, tkus gsrq

mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj ds vtZu ds fy,] Jh v:.k dqekj >k] fc-iz-ls- o l{ke izkf/kdkjh bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs”ku fyfeVsM] ¼ikbiykbu

fMohtu½ iVuk] iks-vks- <syok] flikjk] ftyk iVuk] fiu % 800020] fcgkj dks fyf[kr :i eas vk{ksi Hkst ldsxkA

vuqlwph

ftyk % floku

jkT; % fcgkj

ekStk@xzke

losZ@Cykd@la- (IyksV la-)

lc&Mho&la-

{ks=kiQy

gsDVs;j

vkjs

oxZ ehVj

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

Nhrksyh dyka

2674

00

38

11

Fkkuk uacj&114

2621

00

00

20

2622

00

00

20

2623

00

00

20

2624

00

00

20

2625

00

00

20

2672

00

05

08

2626

00

04

64

2662

00

19

43

2671

00

21

70

2670

00

02

66

2669

00

01

47

2681

00

02

61

2668

00

06

16

2666

00

07

65

2665

00

02

19

2664

00

02

28

2663

00

12

15

2463 ¼jkLrk½

00

01

12

2685

00

02

71

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4331

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4332

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2748

00

02

10

2747

00

01

79

2749

00

06

89

2746

00

00

20

2755

00

01

97

2754

00

16

20

2753

00

00

94

2759

00

06

72

3467

00

08

14

2933

00

02

24

2932

00

02

30

2931

00

07

34

2930

00

16

00

2774

00

00

20

2773

00

00

20

2929

00

00

88

2927

00

02

62

2925

00

00

57

2924

00

00

20

2926

00

02

00

2779

00

09

51

2783

00

05

82

2784

00

05

38

2785

00

01

83

2786

00

00

20

2823

00

06

14

2822

00

03

62

2817

00

16

99

2815

00

18

86

2813

00

05

68

2807

00

00

20

2805

00

05

35

2806

00

04

79

2798

00

02

53

2803

00

06

16

2804

00

00

20

2802

00

09

88

2272

00

09

36

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4333

2270

00

13

41

2267

00

08

16

2266

00

00

20

2256

00

06

22

2265

00

04

18

2382

00

14

56

2383&jkLrk

00

01

29

2385

00

12

49

2201

00

11

85

2200

00

24

85

2199

00

01

87

2211

00

04

92

2210

00

07

00

2208

00

00

20

2213

00

00

20

2209

00

03

73

2214

00

04

76

2215

00

02

84

2216

00

00

20

2219

00

00

87

2220

00

01

90

2107

00

00

20

2109

00

00

20

2110

00

00

20

2111

00

00

71

2218

00

01

45

2221

00

08

45

2108

00

01

18

2222

00

05

17

2223

00

00

77

2226

00

06

55

2224

00

06

87

2095&jkLrk

00

01

13

iqjUnziwj

55&jkLrk

00

02

45

Fkkuk uacj&115

6

00

09

10

7

00

00

20

8

00

02

43

10

00

03

06

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4334

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

9

00

00

20

1

00

27

88

lFkokj

1385

00

06

14

Fkkuk uacj&89

1387

00

17

66

1388

00

03

74

1432

00

00

20

1431

00

01

36

1389

00

08

89

1430

00

02

96

1429

00

01

79

1165

00

00

20

1428

00

10

11

1426

00

03

81

1427

00

00

20

1425

00

00

33

1189

00

07

38

1188

00

00

20

1190

00

00

34

1191

00

02

90

1187

00

00

20

1195

00

04

33

1193

00

01

36

1194

00

04

60

1201

00

00

57

1196

00

00

20

1197

00

00

35

1198

00

03

12

1200

00

02

50

1202

00

00

20

1203

00

00

20

1199

00

02

87

1206

00

06

11

1207

00

01

27

1211

00

01

59

1210

00

00

74

1213

00

01

40

1212

00

00

67

1217

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4335

1216

00

00

93

1214

00

01

43

1215

00

00

20

1209

00

05

30

1226

00

04

22

1229

00

00

81

1230

00

00

20

1235

00

00

20

1227

00

01

52

1228

00

04

40

1249

00

02

08

1248

00

07

11

1245

00

00

20

1246

00

00

20

1247

00

09

55

1255

00

00

20

168

00

00

20

169

00

00

20

165

00

02

18

147

00

03

52

146

00

00

20

151

00

01

31

150

00

02

82

149

00

02

65

148

00

01

57

152

00

03

73

146@1619 ¼jkLrk½

00

02

37

153

00

00

20

chjrh Vksyk

61&jkLrk

00

02

62

Fkkuk uacj&88

210

00

00

20

209

00

00

20

211

00

01

90

214

00

16

96

213

00

01

13

212

00

00

20

215

00

00

20

234

00

00

20

235

00

05

54

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4336

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

236

00

03

24

237

00

02

31

238

00

01

67

239

00

01

73

240

00

02

71

233

00

00

96

339

00

03

02

338

00

00

20

331

00

00

20

330

00

00

20

329

00

00

20

328

00

00

20

327

00

00

20

326

00

00

20

340

00

02

03

341

00

01

61

342

00

03

55

343

00

06

60

318@440

00

00

59

317

00

02

19

316

00

00

20

307&ukyk

00

00

59

306&ukyk

00

04

13

305&ukyk

00

00

53

HkhFkh

217

00

04

30

Fkkuk uacj&86

216

00

00

20

214

00

06

76

207&jkLrk

00

01

23

198

00

03

73

199

00

00

20

200

00

00

40

197

00

05

12

201

00

00

96

192

00

10

10

191

00

04

34

189

00

02

54

188

00

02

32

182

00

03

78

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4337

179

00

04

43

178

00

05

86

177

00

00

20

170

00

00

65

184

00

07

16

183

00

00

20

185

00

09

47

156 ¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

02

52

279

00

14

21

286

00

01

41

285

00

01

92

287

00

02

00

292

00

18

95

350&dPpk jkLrk

00

00

59

351

00

43

44

349

00

03

21

348

00

01

64

346

00

00

25

345

00

00

20

352

00

00

20

356

00

00

56

359

00

00

85

360

00

00

20

357

00

01

80

358

00

00

52

71

00

01

58

70

00

01

93

67

00

01

25

68

00

01

39

69

00

00

39

66 ¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

01

21

64

00

02

15

65

00

02

62

78

00

01

58

63

00

00

84

62

00

01

19

61

00

01

14

60&fQYM psuy

00

00

97

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4338

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

52

00

00

20

59

00

05

06

58

00

00

61

57

00

06

17

56

00

00

76

48 ¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

09

13

604

00

07

86

48@3111

00

20

12

605

00

00

20

606

00

00

20

608

00

00

20

609

00

04

43

610

00

00

20

617

00

00

20

48@3110

00

06

92

626

00

05

16

625

00

09

62

624

00

00

20

627

00

22

80

687

00

01

97

649

00

00

20

650

00

00

20

651

00

00

99

652

00

01

90

653

00

00

20

654

00

05

16

686

00

00

20

685

00

13

71

684

00

02

31

679

00

00

25

681

00

04

39

680

00

00

20

683

00

00

20

682

00

08

44

2160

00

00

20

2161

00

03

02

2162

00

00

20

2164

00

01

25

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4339

2163

00

10

18

2165

00

05

14

2171

00

00

20

2210

00

00

69

2211

00

00

20

2147

00

00

20

2209

00

05

59

2213

00

07

99

2214

00

00

32

2208

00

01

54

2215

00

01

51

2216

00

02

51

2217

00

02

44

2219

00

00

20

2206

00

00

46

2205

00

02

97

2218

00

01

84

2204

00

03

82

2203

00

04

64

2202

00

00

38

2201

00

08

28

2200

00

04

57

2199

00

04

99

2198

00

00

61

2197

00

00

20

2237

00

00

34

2236

00

00

20

2196

00

08

30

2195

00

07

89

2240

00

00

20

2241

00

01

06

2194 ¼fQYM psuy½

00

01

70

2193

00

02

93

2280¼fQYM psuy½

00

00

86

nw/kjk

4090

00

00

43

Fkkuk uacj&73

4089

00

00

20

4092

00

02

68

4093

00

09

73

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4340

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

4094

00

11

09

4095

00

08

32

4099

00

00

28

4098

00

06

85

3137

00

00

97

3133

00

06

49

3132

00

00

61

3134

00

00

20

3131

00

02

50

3130

00

00

20

3124

00

09

33

3122

00

03

42

3121

00

01

15

3120

00

00

20

3119

00

05

93

3116

00

02

03

3117

00

04

80

3118

00

05

60

3106

00

00

37

3159

00

09

30

3160

00

07

99

2391

00

01

28

3098

00

00

20

2390

00

04

75

3161

00

00

73

2392

00

00

30

2389

00

10

84

2394

00

00

20

2388

00

03

44

2406

00

01

44

2407

00

07

67

2408

00

09

68

2410

00

07

36

2377

00

00

20

2376

00

06

13

2375

00

00

79

2374

00

07

18

2372

00

04

89

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4341

2371

00

00

20

2373

00

00

75

2468

00

00

20

2488@4986

00

05

63

2488

00

06

70

2485

00

00

20

2489

00

00

50

2491

00

07

01

2484

00

01

44

2492

00

00

50

2493

00

13

70

2483

00

02

67

2240 ¼Mªsbu½

00

00

83

2503&jkLrk

00

00

84

2227 ¼Mªsbu½

00

01

26

2510

00

06

03

2522

00

00

20

2520

00

00

20

2509

00

02

51

2511

00

07

11

2508

00

00

20

2512

00

04

04

2152

00

01

21

2151

00

04

54

2147

00

04

89

2148

00

03

77

2146

00

04

33

2119

00

00

48

2118

00

03

97

2120

00

05

08

2116

00

00

90

2117

00

00

20

2114

00

00

20

2115

00

06

23

2124

00

01

15

2145

00

01

81

2121

00

00

20

2125

00

04

12

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4342

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2126

00

00

20

2028

00

00

20

2029

00

00

20

2026

00

00

20

2023

00

02

91

2024

00

01

95

2025

00

00

84

2022

00

01

09

2021

00

07

19

2020

00

04

21

2031

00

06

17

2019

00

00

26

2018

00

05

82

2017

00

11

13

1970

00

00

64

1971

00

02

64

1972

00

07

10

2016

00

02

66

2014

00

00

20

1975

00

02

61

1976

00

08

03

1984

00

03

94

1985

00

07

99

1986

00

01

92

1987

00

00

92

1988

00

00

20

1981

00

00

20

1989

00

07

73

1990

00

03

32

1992

00

00

20

1991

00

02

18

1825

00

00

20

1824@4982

00

03

37

1824

00

06

28

1823

00

02

76

1775

00

01

02

1822

00

01

76

1819

00

01

07

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4343

1821

00

00

97

1820

00

04

92

1779

00

00

20

1780

00

00

20

1777

00

00

32

1816

00

00

96

1784

00

04

10

1785

00

04

25

1786

00

00

95

1801

00

00

63

1802

00

00

20

1800

00

10

40

1799

00

01

65

1798

00

00

20

1799@4991

00

04

93

1650&/keM

00

06

29

[koliqj

399

00

04

62

Fkkuk uacj&74

400

00

04

96

401

00

00

20

406

00

04

55

397

00

06

75

409

00

00

20

396

00

04

46

395

00

00

20

410

00

00

27

394

00

01

35

393

00

00

20

376

00

06

39

377

00

09

43

378

00

07

64

379

00

01

89

383

00

01

80

382

00

05

62

381

00

01

23

388

00

00

20

384

00

06

75

46

00

00

88

47

00

12

08

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4344

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

49

00

01

44

48

00

11

15

57

00

00

20

78¼jkLrk½

00

03

15

109

00

09

96

99

00

06

60

106

00

01

31

100

00

00

38

105

00

06

91

103

00

02

20

104

00

03

88

93

00

04

09

123

00

03

13

122

00

00

20

92

00

00

20

124

00

04

97

125

00

02

22

91

00

08

92

90

00

03

83

89

00

00

20

85

00

00

20

86

00

05

75

87

00

06

66

88

00

11

45

4003

00

00

61

4

00

03

87

fldkfV;k

1257

00

03

12

Fkkuk uacj&63

1258

00

05

60

1259

00

13

36

1301

00

01

03

1300

00

00

20

1267

00

00

29

1268

00

02

74

1270

00

04

64

1271

00

01

81

1272

00

01

56

1274

00

03

98

1297

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4345

1275

00

07

85

1276

00

07

18

1281

00

03

29

1282

00

00

20

1283

00

00

20

1278

00

01

17

1280

00

00

61

1279

00

03

36

2025

00

07

11

2022

00

03

45

2024

00

02

13

2021

00

00

32

2023

00

03

13

2018

00

04

44

2004

00

03

55

2006

00

00

20

2003

00

00

20

tykyiqj

197

00

01

69

Fkkuk uacj&62

196

00

04

83

195

00

12

22

194

00

03

74

218

00

00

76

193 ¼jkLrk½

00

03

85

182

00

07

20

192

00

00

20

184

00

03

75

183

00

02

66

185

00

02

06

176

00

00

27

179

00

00

56

177

00

03

42

178

00

04

20

161

00

16

41

170

00

00

20

162

00

04

85

164

00

01

67

163

00

01

09

149

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4346

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

145

00

06

08

144

00

00

20

140

00

00

20

147

00

00

62

146

00

08

24

82

00

00

20

139

00

00

35

83

00

08

28

84

00

02

73

81

00

06

78

85

00

00

20

89

00

02

83

88

00

00

20

80

00

01

93

93

00

01

82

92

00

00

59

90

00

00

20

79

00

00

20

94

00

02

96

95

00

00

20

96

00

03

53

36

00

08

62

35

00

11

03

34

00

00

20

33

00

01

58

32

00

07

84

2

00

01

51

30

00

08

06

5

00

01

37

4

00

00

20

6

00

04

87

7

00

00

03

8

00

04

59

9

00

02

13

11

00

02

12

Mqejk

2877

00

05

59

Fkkuk uacj&58

2873

00

00

20

2883

00

11

79

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4347

2884

00

00

20

2882

00

08

71

2881

00

00

20

2891

00

03

70

2890

00

05

14

2889

00

00

20

2896

00

00

20

2892

00

00

66

2893

00

03

10

2894

00

02

05

2895

00

02

75

2842

00

07

35

2942

00

14

63

2941

00

00

20

2943

00

13

21

2945¼jkLrk½

00

01

60

2958

00

16

43

2957

00

00

20

2970

00

07

39

2971

00

00

20

2969

00

10

15

2972

00

00

70

2968

00

00

31

2974

00

05

30

2975

00

02

88

2976

00

08

46

2978

00

00

20

2977

00

01

75

2985 ¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

01

94

3003

00

00

20

3002

00

12

06

3001

00

00

38

2994

00

07

89

2993

00

00

20

2991

00

00

20

2990

00

03

98

2989

00

01

80

2995

00

00

61

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4348

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2996

00

00

20

2988

00

02

47

2987

00

00

20

2997

00

06

56

3068

00

07

59

2998

00

00

32

3062

00

00

20

3067

00

05

62

3065

00

00

20

3070

00

03

01

3069

00

00

20

3071

00

03

41

3076

00

02

53

3077

00

00

20

3072

00

00

20

3075

00

19

21

3074

00

00

41

3082

00

01

23

3084

00

00

61

3083

00

06

15

3086

00

00

20

3092¼jkLrk½

00

01

68

3111¼jkLrk½

00

00

95

3112¼jkLrk½

00

01

45

4594

00

01

58

4501

00

07

04

4502

00

00

20

3377

00

08

34

4499

00

00

20

3378

00

09

82

4498

00

00

20

4495

00

00

20

3375

00

00

20

3382

00

00

20

3379

00

06

68

3380

00

05

70

3381

00

06

47

3383

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4349

3384

00

00

20

3385

00

00

20

3387

00

00

64

3386

00

07

05

3385

00

00

20

3346

00

03

26

3388

00

03

13

3345

00

03

14

3222

00

02

36

3321

00

16

44

3320

00

00

20

3323

00

00

20

3325

00

01

15

3326

00

03

34

3318

00

04

35

3317

00

16

01

3333

00

00

71

3334

00

01

18

3335

00

01

49

3521

00

03

74

3519

00

04

77

3518

00

03

87

3524

00

03

03

3523

00

02

22

3530

00

03

65

3526

00

00

42

3527

00

00

30

3528

00

00

34

3529

00

02

72

3602

00

06

66

3603

00

02

55

3606

00

02

57

3611

00

02

65

3620

00

03

01

3616

00

03

38

3613

00

00

20

3614

00

00

20

3615

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4350

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

3618

00

00

20

3617

00

03

46

3625

00

00

20

3627

00

00

20

3626

00

12

23

3680

00

05

80

3647

00

00

20

3679

00

08

08

3648

00

00

20

3678

00

01

75

3677

00

08

62

3676

00

05

98

3675

00

00

20

3673

00

00

20

3672

00

06

52

3791

00

17

46

3796

00

00

20

3795

00

00

20

3794

00

00

20

3792

00

03

50

3793

00

00

20

3818

00

04

80

3817

00

07

86

3816

00

00

20

3890

00

07

75

3889

00

00

20

3885

00

18

36

3886

00

00

20

3891

00

03

19

3892

00

00

20

3884

00

17

08

5392

00

06

16

5389

00

01

96

5391

00

05

59

5393

00

00

20

5390

00

01

41

5394

00

01

28

5395

00

04

65

5398

00

03

98

5397

00

00

41

5399

00

00

20

5400

00

00

20

5469

00

00

39

5468

00

00

20

5467

00

00

20

5466

00

00

20

5470

00

01

85

5471

00

00

92

5474

00

00

20

5472

00

03

96

5473

00

02

19

5462

00

03

99

5461

00

04

55

5460

00

00

20

5459

00

03

84

5475

00

00

20

5457

00

02

95

5456

00

00

20

5458

00

07

99

5477

00

02

55

5452

00

03

23

5478

00

00

26

5755

00

01

09

5881

00

07

56

5487¼jkLrk½

00

01

80

5497

00

10

29

5496

00

00

20

5495

00

00

20

5494

00

11

95

5497

00

06

37

¹iQk- la- vkj&25011@15@2013&vksvkj&Iº

iou oqQekj] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 5th August, 2013

S.O. 1625.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest

that a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited in Dist. Siwan in the State of Bihar for ‘Patna

to Motihari and Baitalpur Pipeline’ for the transportation of Petroleum Product;

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4351

And, whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is

necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which

is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum

and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government

hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the

date on which the copies of the notification issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as

published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of

the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land, to Shri Arun Kumar Jha B.A.S. & Competent

Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited. (Pipelines Division) P.O. Dhelwan, Sipara, Dist. Patna (Bihar.)

Pin – 800020.

SCHEDULE

Dist.: Siwan

State : Bihar

Mouja / Village

Survey/Block No.

Sub-Div.-No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

CHHITAULI KALAN

2674

00

38

11

Thana No. 114

2621

00

00

20

2622

00

00

20

2623

00

00

20

2624

00

00

20

2625

00

00

20

2672

00

05

08

2626

00

04

64

2662

00

19

43

2671

00

21

70

2670

00

02

66

2669

00

01

47

2681

00

02

61

2668

00

06

16

2666

00

07

65

2665

00

02

19

2664

00

02

28

2663

00

12

15

2463 (Road)

00

01

12

4352

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4353

2685

00

02

71

2748

00

02

10

2747

00

01

79

2749

00

06

89

2746

00

00

20

2755

00

01

97

2754

00

16

20

2753

00

00

94

2759

00

06

72

3467

00

08

14

2933

00

02

24

2932

00

02

30

2931

00

07

34

2930

00

16

00

2774

00

00

20

2773

00

00

20

2929

00

00

88

2927

00

02

62

2925

00

00

57

2924

00

00

20

2926

00

02

00

2779

00

09

51

2783

00

05

82

2784

00

05

38

2785

00

01

83

2786

00

00

20

2823

00

06

14

2822

00

03

62

2817

00

16

99

2815

00

18

86

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4354

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2813

00

05

68

2807

00

00

20

2805

00

05

35

2806

00

04

79

2798

00

02

53

2803

00

06

16

2804

00

00

20

2802

00

09

88

2272

00

09

36

2270

00

13

41

2267

00

08

16

2266

00

00

20

2256

00

06

22

2265

00

04

18

2382

00

14

56

2383-Road

00

01

29

2385

00

12

49

2201

00

11

85

2200

00

24

85

2199

00

01

87

2211

00

04

92

2210

00

07

00

2208

00

00

20

2213

00

00

20

2209

00

03

73

2214

00

04

76

2215

00

02

84

2216

00

00

20

2219

00

00

87

2220

00

01

90

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4355

2107

00

00

20

2109

00

00

20

2110

00

00

20

2111

00

00

71

2218

00

01

45

2221

00

08

45

2108

00

01

18

2222

00

05

17

2223

00

00

77

2226

00

06

55

2224

00

06

87

2095-Road

00

01

13

PURANDRPUR

55-Road

00

02

45

Thana No-115

6

00

09

10

7

00

00

20

8

00

02

43

10

00

03

06

9

00

00

20

1

00

27

88

SATHWAR

1385

00

06

14

Thana No-89

1387

00

17

66

1388

00

03

74

1432

00

00

20

1431

00

01

36

1389

00

08

89

1430

00

02

96

1429

00

01

79

1165

00

00

20

1428

00

10

11

1426

00

03

81

1427

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4356

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1425

00

00

33

1189

00

07

38

1188

00

00

20

1190

00

00

34

1191

00

02

90

1187

00

00

20

1195

00

04

33

1193

00

01

36

1194

00

04

60

1201

00

00

57

1196

00

00

20

1197

00

00

35

1198

00

03

12

1200

00

02

50

1202

00

00

20

1203

00

00

20

1199

00

02

87

1206

00

06

11

1207

00

01

27

1211

00

01

59

1210

00

00

74

1213

00

01

40

1212

00

00

67

1217

00

00

20

1216

00

00

93

1214

00

01

43

1215

00

00

20

1209

00

05

30

1226

00

04

22

1229

00

00

81

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4357

1230

00

00

20

1235

00

00

20

1227

00

01

52

1228

00

04

40

1249

00

02

08

1248

00

07

11

1245

00

00

20

1246

00

00

20

1247

00

09

55

1255

00

00

20

168

00

00

20

169

00

00

20

165

00

02

18

147

00

03

52

146

00

00

20

151

00

01

31

150

00

02

82

149

00

02

65

148

00

01

57

152

00

03

73

146/1619 (ROAD)

00

02

37

153

00

00

20

BIRTI TOLA

61-Road

00

02

62

Thana No-88

210

00

00

20

209

00

00

20

211

00

01

90

214

00

16

96

213

00

01

13

212

00

00

20

215

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4358

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

234

00

00

20

235

00

05

54

236

00

03

24

237

00

02

31

238

00

01

67

239

00

01

73

240

00

02

71

233

00

00

96

339

00

03

02

338

00

00

20

331

00

00

20

330

00

00

20

329

00

00

20

328

00

00

20

327

00

00

20

326

00

00

20

340

00

02

03

341

00

01

61

342

00

03

55

343

00

06

60

318/440

00

00

59

317

00

02

19

316

00

00

20

307-Nala

00

00

59

306-Nala

00

04

13

305-Nala

00

00

53

BHITHI

217

00

04

30

Thana No-86

216

00

00

20

214

00

06

76

207-Road

00

01

23

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4359

198

00

03

73

199

00

00

20

200

00

00

40

197

00

05

12

201

00

00

96

192

00

10

10

191

00

04

34

189

00

02

54

188

00

02

32

182

00

03

78

179

00

04

43

178

00

05

86

177

00

00

20

170

00

00

65

184

00

07

16

183

00

00

20

185

00

09

47

156 (Cart track)

00

02

52

279

00

14

21

286

00

01

41

285

00

01

92

287

00

02

00

292

00

18

95

350-Cart track

00

00

59

351

00

43

44

349

00

03

21

348

00

01

64

346

00

00

25

345

00

00

20

352

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4360

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

356

00

00

56

359

00

00

85

360

00

00

20

357

00

01

80

358

00

00

52

71

00

01

58

70

00

01

93

67

00

01

25

68

00

01

39

69

00

00

39

66 (Cart track)

00

01

21

64

00

02

15

65

00

02

62

78

00

01

58

63

00

00

84

62

00

01

19

61

00

01

14

60-Field Channel

00

00

97

52

00

00

20

59

00

05

06

58

00

00

61

57

00

06

17

56

00

00

76

48 (Cart Track)

00

09

13

604

00

07

86

48/3111

00

20

12

605

00

00

20

606

00

00

20

608

00

00

20

609

00

04

43

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4361

610

00

00

20

617

00

00

20

48/3110

00

06

92

626

00

05

16

625

00

09

62

624

00

00

20

627

00

22

80

687

00

01

97

649

00

00

20

650

00

00

20

651

00

00

99

652

00

01

90

653

00

00

20

654

00

05

16

686

00

00

20

685

00

13

71

684

00

02

31

679

00

00

25

681

00

04

39

680

00

00

20

683

00

00

20

682

00

08

44

2160

00

00

20

2161

00

03

02

2162

00

00

20

2164

00

01

25

2163

00

10

18

2165

00

05

14

2171

00

00

20

2210

00

00

69

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4362

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2211

00

00

20

2147

00

00

20

2209

00

05

59

2213

00

07

99

2214

00

00

32

2208

00

01

54

2215

00

01

51

2216

00

02

51

2217

00

02

44

2219

00

00

20

2206

00

00

46

2205

00

02

97

2218

00

01

84

2204

00

03

82

2203

00

04

64

2202

00

00

38

2201

00

08

28

2200

00

04

57

2199

00

04

99

2198

00

00

61

2197

00

00

20

2237

00

00

34

2236

00

00

20

2196

00

08

30

2195

00

07

89

2240

00

00

20

2241

00

01

06

2194 (Field Channel)

00

01

70

2193

00

02

93

2280-Field Channel

00

00

86

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4363

DUDHRA

4090

00

00

43

Thana No-73

4089

00

00

20

4092

00

02

68

4093

00

09

73

4094

00

11

09

4095

00

08

32

4099

00

00

28

4098

00

06

85

3137

00

00

97

3133

00

06

49

3132

00

00

61

3134

00

00

20

3131

00

02

50

3130

00

00

20

3124

00

09

33

3122

00

03

42

3121

00

01

15

3120

00

00

20

3119

00

05

93

3116

00

02

03

3117

00

04

80

3118

00

05

60

3106

00

00

37

3159

00

09

30

3160

00

07

99

2391

00

01

28

3098

00

00

20

2390

00

04

75

3161

00

00

73

2392

00

00

30

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4364

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2389

00

10

84

2394

00

00

20

2388

00

03

44

2406

00

01

44

2407

00

07

67

2408

00

09

68

2410

00

07

36

2377

00

00

20

2376

00

06

13

2375

00

00

79

2374

00

07

18

2372

00

04

89

2371

00

00

20

2373

00

00

75

2468

00

00

20

2488/4986

00

05

63

2488

00

06

70

2485

00

00

20

2489

00

00

50

2491

00

07

01

2484

00

01

44

2492

00

00

50

2493

00

13

70

2483

00

02

67

2240 (DRAIN)

00

00

83

2503-ROAD

00

00

84

2227 (DRAIN)

00

01

26

2510

00

06

03

2522

00

00

20

2520

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4365

2509

00

02

51

2511

00

07

11

2508

00

00

20

2512

00

04

04

2152

00

01

21

2151

00

04

54

2147

00

04

89

2148

00

03

77

2146

00

04

33

2119

00

00

48

2118

00

03

97

2120

00

05

08

2116

00

00

90

2117

00

00

20

2114

00

00

20

2115

00

06

23

2124

00

01

15

2145

00

01

81

2121

00

00

20

2125

00

04

12

2126

00

00

20

2028

00

00

20

2029

00

00

20

2026

00

00

20

2023

00

02

91

2024

00

01

95

2025

00

00

84

2022

00

01

09

2021

00

07

19

2020

00

04

21

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4366

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2031

00

06

17

2019

00

00

26

2018

00

05

82

2017

00

11

13

1970

00

00

64

1971

00

02

64

1972

00

07

10

2016

00

02

66

2014

00

00

20

1975

00

02

61

1976

00

08

03

1984

00

03

94

1985

00

07

99

1986

00

01

92

1987

00

00

92

1988

00

00

20

1981

00

00

20

1989

00

07

73

1990

00

03

32

1992

00

00

20

1991

00

02

18

1825

00

00

20

1824/4982

00

03

37

1824

00

06

28

1823

00

02

76

1775

00

01

02

1822

00

01

76

1819

00

01

07

1821

00

00

97

1820

00

04

92

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4367

1779

00

00

20

1780

00

00

20

1777

00

00

32

1816

00

00

96

1784

00

04

10

1785

00

04

25

1786

00

00

95

1801

00

00

63

1802

00

00

20

1800

00

10

40

1799

00

01

65

1798

00

00

20

1799/4991

00

04

93

1650-Dhamai Nadi

00

06

29

KHAWASPUR

399

00

04

62

Thana No. -74

400

00

04

96

401

00

00

20

406

00

04

55

397

00

06

75

409

00

00

20

396

00

04

46

395

00

00

20

410

00

00

27

394

00

01

35

393

00

00

20

376

00

06

39

377

00

09

43

378

00

07

64

379

00

01

89

383

00

01

80

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4368

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

382

00

05

62

381

00

01

23

388

00

00

20

384

00

06

75

46

00

00

88

47

00

12

08

49

00

01

44

48

00

11

15

57

00

00

20

78 (ROAD)

00

03

15

109

00

09

96

99

00

06

60

106

00

01

31

100

00

00

38

105

00

06

91

103

00

02

20

104

00

03

88

93

00

04

09

123

00

03

13

122

00

00

20

92

00

00

20

124

00

04

97

125

00

02

22

91

00

08

92

90

00

03

83

89

00

00

20

85

00

00

20

86

00

05

75

87

00

06

66

88

00

11

45

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4369

4003

00

00

61

4

00

03

87

SIKATIA

1257

00

03

12

Thana No. -63

1258

00

05

60

1259

00

13

36

1301

00

01

03

1300

00

00

20

1267

00

00

29

1268

00

02

74

1270

00

04

64

1271

00

01

81

1272

00

01

56

1274

00

03

98

1297

00

00

20

1275

00

07

85

1276

00

07

18

1281

00

03

29

1282

00

00

20

1283

00

00

20

1278

00

01

17

1280

00

00

61

1279

00

03

36

2025

00

07

11

2022

00

03

45

2024

00

02

13

2021

00

00

32

2023

00

03

13

2018

00

04

44

2004

00

03

55

2006

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4370

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2003

00

00

20

JALALPUR

197

00

01

69

Thana No. -62

196

00

04

83

195

00

12

22

194

00

03

74

218

00

00

76

193(ROAD)

00

03

85

182

00

07

20

192

00

00

20

184

00

03

75

183

00

02

66

185

00

02

06

176

00

00

27

179

00

00

56

177

00

03

42

178

00

04

20

161

00

16

41

170

00

00

20

162

00

04

85

164

00

01

67

163

00

01

09

149

00

00

20

145

00

06

08

144

00

00

20

140

00

00

20

147

00

00

62

146

00

08

24

82

00

00

20

139

00

00

35

83

00

08

28

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4371

84

00

02

73

81

00

06

78

85

00

00

20

89

00

02

83

88

00

00

20

80

00

01

93

93

00

01

82

92

00

00

59

90

00

00

20

79

00

00

20

94

00

02

96

95

00

00

20

96

00

03

53

36

00

08

62

35

00

11

03

34

00

00

20

33

00

01

58

32

00

07

84

2

00

01

51

30

00

08

06

5

00

01

37

4

00

00

20

6

00

04

87

7

00

00

03

8

00

04

59

9

00

02

13

11

00

02

12

DUMRA

2877

00

05

59

Thana No. -85

2873

00

00

20

2883

00

11

79

2884

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4372

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2882

00

08

71

2881

00

00

20

2891

00

03

70

2890

00

05

14

2889

00

00

20

2896

00

00

20

2892

00

00

66

2893

00

03

10

2894

00

02

05

2895

00

02

75

2842

00

07

35

2942

00

14

63

2941

00

00

20

2943

00

13

21

2945(ROAD)

00

01

60

2958

00

16

43

2957

00

00

20

2970

00

07

39

2971

00

00

20

2969

00

10

15

2972

00

00

70

`

2968

00

00

31

2974

00

05

30

2975

00

02

88

2976

00

08

46

2978

00

00

20

2977

00

01

75

2985(CART TRACK)

00

01

94

3003

00

00

20

3002

00

12

06

3001

00

00

38

2994

00

07

89

2993

00

00

20

2991

00

00

20

2990

00

03

98

2989

00

01

80

2995

00

00

61

2996

00

00

20

2988

00

02

47

2987

00

00

20

2997

00

06

56

3068

00

07

59

2998

00

00

32

3062

00

00

20

3067

00

05

62

3065

00

00

20

3070

00

03

01

3069

00

00

20

3071

00

03

41

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4373

3076

00

02

53

3077

00

00

20

3072

00

00

20

3075

00

19

21

3074

00

00

41

3082

00

01

23

3084

00

00

61

3083

00

06

15

3086

00

00

20

3092(ROAD)

00

01

68

3111(ROAD)

00

00

95

3112(ROAD)

00

01

45

4594

00

01

58

4501

00

07

04

4502

00

00

20

3377

00

08

34

4499

00

00

20

3378

00

09

82

4498

00

00

20

4495

00

00

20

3375

00

00

20

3382

00

00

20

3379

00

06

68

3380

00

05

70

3381

00

06

47

3383

00

00

20

3384

00

00

20

3385

00

00

20

3387

00

00

64

3386

00

07

05

3385

00

00

20

3346

00

03

26

3388

00

03

13

3345

00

03

14

3222

00

02

36

3321

00

16

44

3320

00

00

20

3323

00

00

20

3325

00

01

15

3326

00

03

34

3318

00

04

35

3317

00

16

01

3333

00

00

71

3334

00

01

18

3335

00

01

49

3521

00

03

74

3519

00

04

77

3518

00

03

87

3524

00

03

03

3523

00

02

22

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4374

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

3530

00

03

65

3526

00

00

42

3527

00

00

30

3528

00

00

34

3529

00

02

72

3602

00

06

66

3603

00

02

55

3606

00

02

57

3611

00

02

65

3620

00

03

01

3616

00

03

38

3613

00

00

20

3614

00

00

20

3615

00

00

20

3618

00

00

20

3617

00

03

46

3625

00

00

20

3627

00

00

20

3626

00

12

23

3680

00

05

80

3647

00

00

20

3679

00

08

08

3648

00

00

20

3678

00

01

75

3677

00

08

62

3676

00

05

98

3675

00

00

20

3673

00

00

20

3672

00

06

52

3791

00

17

46

3796

00

00

20

3795

00

00

20

3794

00

00

20

3792

00

03

50

3793

00

00

20

3818

00

04

80

3817

00

07

86

3816

00

00

20

3890

00

07

75

3889

00

00

20

3885

00

18

36

3886

00

00

20

3891

00

03

19

3892

00

00

20

3884

00

17

08

5392

00

06

16

5389

00

01

96

5391

00

05

59

5393

00

00

20

5390

00

01

41

5394

00

01

28

5395

00

04

65

5398

00

03

98

5397

00

00

41

5399

00

00

20

5400

00

00

20

5469

00

00

39

5468

00

00

20

5467

00

00

20

5466

00

00

20

5470

00

01

85

5471

00

00

92

5474

00

00

20

5472

00

03

96

5473

00

02

19

5462

00

03

99

5461

00

04

55

5460

00

00

20

5459

00

03

84

5475

00

00

20

5457

00

02

95

5456

00

00

20

5458

00

07

99

5477

00

02

55

5452

00

03

23

5478

00

00

26

5755

00

01

09

5881

00

07

56

5487(ROAD)

00

01

80

5497

00

10

29

5496

00

00

20

5495

00

00

20

5494

00

11

95

5497

00

06

37

[F.No. R-25011/15 /2013-OR-I]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4375

ubZ fnYyh] 5 vxLr] 2013

dk-vk- 1626-—dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slk izrhr gksrk gS fd yksdfgr esa ;g vko';d gS fd iVuk ls eksfrgkjh vkSj csrkyiqj rd

isVªksfy;e inkFkks± ds ifjogu gsrq ftyk % floku] jkT; fcgkj esa bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkuh pkfg, A

vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slh ikbiykbu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, vko';d izrhr gksrk gS fd ml Hkwfe esa ftlds Hkhrj mDr

ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkus dk izLrko gS vkSj tks bl vf/lwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa o£.kr gS] mi;ksx dk vtZu fd;k tk,_

vr% vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbUl (Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/dkj dk vtZu) vf/fu;e] 1962 (1962

dk 50) dh /kjk 3 dh mi&/kjk (1) }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] mDr Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/dkj dk vtZu djus ds vius

vk'k; dh ?kks"k.kk djrh gS_

dksbZ O;fDr] tks mDr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa fgrc¼ gS] ml rkjh[k ls ftldks] Hkkjr ds jkti=k esa ;Fkk izdkf'kr bl

vfèklwpuk dh izfr;ka lk/kj.k turk dks miyC/ djk nh tkrh gSa] bDdhl fnu ds vUnj] Hkwfe ds Hkhrj ikbiykbu fcNk, tkus gsrq mi;ksx

ds vf/dkj ds vtZu ds fy,] Jh v:.k dqekj >k] fc-iz-ls- o l{ke izkf/dkjh bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM] (ikbiykbu fMohtu)

iVuk] iks-vks- <syok] flikjk] ftyk iVuk] fiu % 800020] fcgkj dks fyf[kr :i eas vk{ksi Hkst ldsxkA

vuqlwph

ftyk % floku

jkT; % fcgkj

ekStk@xzke

losZ@Cykd@la- (IyksV la-)

lc&fMo&la-

{ks=kiQy

gsDVs;j

vkjs

oxZ ehVj

1

2

3

4

5

6

ngdkbZ

401

00

03

53

Fkkuk uacj&231

402

00

00

20

400

00

06

01

397

00

01

84

398

00

07

06

395 ¼jkLrk½

00

03

57

399

00

00

20

394

00

17

63

393

00

02

32

391

00

04

03

389

00

01

25

390

00

02

79

386

00

09

02

385

00

04

68

384

00

04

57

363

00

03

24

362

00

02

89

339

00

10

18

340

00

08

24

341

00

06

84

341@407

00

01

88

261

00

01

38

262

00

03

73

4376

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4377

265

00

05

02

264

00

00

20

269

00

00

20

270

00

00

20

266

00

04

14

267

00

02

85

268

00

02

13

248

00

00

42

247

00

00

20

244

00

03

47

243

00

00

48

245

00

04

31

242

00

07

93

241

00

00

64

nkSu Nkijk

288

00

09

02

Fkkuk uacj&230

286

00

13

43

280

00

01

98

281

00

04

32

282

00

00

20

279

00

17

51

200 ¼jkLrk½

00

01

40

196

00

01

46

193

00

17

63

194

00

03

17

70

00

00

63

71

00

00

20

69

00

03

16

67

00

02

87

66

00

01

86

65

00

02

10

63

00

04

01

62

00

08

60

59

00

04

04

58

00

04

15

56

00

05

15

57

00

02

21

55

00

00

20

60

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4378

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

54

00

05

77

eaNk

855

00

01

21

Fkkuk uacj&225

857

00

05

58

854

00

01

90

853

00

03

36

858

00

00

68

859

00

00

20

851

00

00

20

852

00

02

20

848

00

04

55

849

00

02

42

847

00

00

41

846

00

02

40

844

00

02

86

843

00

00

20

845

00

03

72

842

00

03

69

Hknsvk

231

00

03

38

Fkkuk uacj&226

211

00

00

20

212

00

24

00

209

00

03

45

210

00

00

20

198

00

05

77

199

00

06

70

200

00

08

55

201

00

07

51

183

00

14

99

185

00

00

20

184

00

11

59

178

00

02

01

179

00

00

20

164

00

00

74

177

00

15

27

176

00

00

20

171

00

06

59

174

00

00

27

172

00

01

16

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4379

169

00

15

09

170

00

00

20

166

00

00

20

168

00

05

46

85

00

03

05

86

00

00

20

167

00

00

54

90

00

03

91

91

00

01

79

92

00

02

36

93

00

03

01

114

00

01

58

113

00

09

63

112

00

00

20

115

00

01

24

110

00

06

10

109

00

02

63

108

00

03

17

107

00

01

24

106

00

00

20

117

00

01

85

118

00

01

28

119

00

02

01

105

00

00

20

104

00

01

59

121

00

14

54

123

00

00

20

122

00

00

20

10

00

00

28

9

00

00

20

mLVh

540

00

07

54

Fkkuk uacj&224

541

00

01

55

542

00

00

20

539

00

06

43

538

00

02

86

536

00

12

37

465

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4380

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

531

00

00

48

466

00

11

36

467

00

04

99

460

00

00

46

459

00

03

29

468

00

00

20

400@1910

00

00

20

458

00

08

51

456

00

00

47

457

00

00

20

455

00

04

71

454 ¼jkLrk½

00

04

43

453

00

00

20

320

00

00

20

470

00

00

20

311¼jkLrk½

00

00

20

312¼jkLrk½

00

01

96

313

00

01

39

314¼jkLrk½

00

03

86

317

00

00

20

315

00

06

55

295@1931

00

00

20

310

00

00

20

316

00

00

40

291

00

00

20

290

00

02

33

289

00

05

48

288

00

06

61

287

00

04

47

284

00

00

20

286

00

04

61

190

00

00

20

191

00

00

29

192

00

00

61

193

00

01

43

194

00

06

60

195

00

03

68

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4381

196

00

03

52

199

00

00

20

198

00

02

82

197¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

04

40

200¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

04

14

201¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

00

42

202

00

00

20

89

00

00

20

88

00

02

06

84

00

04

62

83

00

06

53

78

00

01

74

76

00

00

20

82

00

02

55

81

00

03

40

79

00

07

32

74

00

01

54

72

00

00

20

80

00

11

54

egwvy

1005

00

00

20

Fkkuk uacj&202

1004

00

06

23

1003

00

06

82

1000

00

00

20

1001

00

00

20

999

00

16

81

992

00

05

93

973

00

08

12

974

00

00

38

975

00

09

02

977

00

00

20

986

00

01

93

981

00

10

71

984

00

00

20

983

00

00

39

982

00

04

99

947

00

06

71

946

00

11

21

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4382

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

945

00

04

08

940

00

02

06

941

00

00

20

865¼jkLrk½

00

01

42

857

00

00

20

858

00

05

89

859

00

06

15

860

00

00

35

861

00

00

20

815

00

02

78

816

00

00

20

814

00

07

32

813

00

07

20

819

00

00

38

823

00

06

10

806

00

00

20

822

00

02

28

805

00

01

90

824

00

01

99

804

00

02

08

801

00

03

87

800

00

03

80

799

00

08

60

798

00

00

97

797

00

00

20

752

00

01

42

793

00

14

50

792

00

01

91

790

00

13

20

787

00

07

13

788

00

01

38

783

00

05

49

784

00

00

20

782

00

00

58

499

00

04

40

780

00

01

19

779

00

00

81

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4383

500

00

06

84

778

00

00

20

501

00

02

30

777

00

00

62

503

00

05

96

510

00

02

80

504

00

00

74

506

00

01

27

505

00

00

20

507

00

03

31

508

00

00

36

509

00

00

20

543

00

05

19

546

00

05

55

545

00

01

01

547

00

06

64

548

00

04

38

497¼jkLrk½

00

01

69

483

00

00

00

556

00

00

20

480

00

00

20

479

00

01

38

478

00

01

73

477

00

06

26

475

00

03

30

474

00

02

87

463

00

04

19

452

00

02

12

451

00

01

24

450

00

01

07

449

00

00

65

448

00

00

20

453

00

00

83

454

00

02

17

447

00

03

94

446

00

00

24

442

00

00

51

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4384

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

441

00

00

96

433

00

00

70

434

00

02

90

432

00

04

14

408

00

00

77

407

00

00

20

409

00

03

13

403

00

08

75

402

00

00

20

400@2802

00

00

20

369

00

00

27

401

00

08

40

400

00

03

61

394

00

03

45

393

00

00

20

395

00

06

43

396

00

06

98

397

00

00

20

391

00

00

43

ehjkpd

361

00

01

41

Fkkuk uacj&199

362

00

00

20

367

00

00

20

360

00

02

97

359

00

01

31

358

00

00

71

356

00

03

09

354

00

03

18

355

00

00

20

353

00

06

23

348

00

10

16

210

00

00

20

211

00

00

20

209

00

00

54

207

00

01

20

208

00

05

68

214

00

05

10

206

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4385

ehjk pd Fkkuk uacj& 199

215

00

04

46

204

00

00

20

216

00

06

16

217

00

09

59

218

00

00

20

219

00

07

77

220

00

04

70

179¼jkLrk½

00

01

52

189

00

02

17

188

00

00

85

187

00

01

14

186

00

00

78

190

00

00

20

185

00

03

74

184

00

02

01

183

00

00

20

180

00

23

07

38

00

01

68

39

00

05

20

37

00

00

20

36

00

02

02

34

00

02

25

35

00

03

10

eanjk ikyh

1378

00

00

61

Fkkuk uacj&394

1377

00

22

37

1375

00

09

35

1376

00

13

79

1372

00

08

83

1371

00

04

61

1368

00

00

20

1367

00

05

20

1363

00

00

92

1361

00

03

48

1362

00

02

04

1360

00

02

58

1359

00

00

20

1154

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4386

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

enjk ikyh

1155

00

00

87

Fkkuk uacj&394

1156

00

03

83

1157

00

06

64

1160

00

00

27

1159

00

02

43

1158

00

00

39

1164

00

11

04

1165

00

07

33

1175

00

00

29

1175@1897

00

01

09

1174

00

03

60

1167

00

00

20

1173

00

07

06

1169

00

09

40

1137

00

00

36

1136

00

03

49

1024

00

07

24

1025¼jkLrk½

00

01

89

1028

00

13

33

1032

00

17

53

1034

00

05

51

1033

00

03

47

1036

00

02

20

1037

00

02

09

1040

00

00

90

1039

00

02

91

1045

00

08

50

1044

00

01

94

1043

00

01

20

1046¼jkLrk½

00

02

44

316

00

11

28

317

00

00

20

315

00

09

82

313

00

01

53

322

00

05

07

323

00

01

06

325

00

03

56

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4387

eanjk ikyh

327

00

11

86

Fkkuh uacj&394

328

00

09

70

334

00

00

87

335

00

06

39

337¼jkLrk½

00

01

97

393¼jkLrk½

00

00

20

383

00

09

78

366

00

08

78

382

00

03

09

367

00

10

24

368

00

02

93

369

00

05

11

362

00

06

86

361

00

07

41

357

00

00

20

355

00

11

94

354

00

16

27

349

00

03

16

348

00

02

07

347

00

07

15

346

00

18

27

345

00

03

33

72

00

02

86

71

00

03

80

70

00

02

53

69

00

01

21

68

00

00

78

67

00

00

64

66

00

00

20

64

00

00

20

73

00

13

01

49

00

13

47

50

00

06

10

51

00

03

11

48

00

31

26

41

00

01

83

eanjkmyh

1985

00

00

20

Fkkuk uacj&394

1984

00

09

27

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4388

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1983

00

06

96

1973

00

03

07

1972

00

00

20

1974

00

09

56

1975

00

03

04

1942

00

14

99

1971

00

00

20

1934

00

06

60

1943

00

00

20

1935

00

03

23

1933

00

01

91

1932

00

13

75

1896

00

07

63

1923

00

00

20

1921

00

00

20

1898

00

00

20

1922

00

00

35

1897

00

03

20

1887

00

06

47

1885

00

02

53

1886

00

08

27

1862

00

00

20

1884

00

01

98

1883

00

00

85

1881

00

00

20

1882

00

01

24

1863

00

02

48

1867

00

02

54

1868

00

00

20

1864

00

05

26

1866¼jkLrk½

00

03

30

946

00

11

07

936

00

00

20

932

00

00

20

937

00

05

10

931

00

05

95

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4389

eanjkM+yh

422¼jkLrk½

00

04

15

Fkkuk uacj&393

350

00

20

39

380

00

00

20

381

00

04

90

382

00

06

40

394

00

08

52

393

00

01

41

392

00

00

20

391¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

01

66

53

00

03

28

402

00

01

96

408

00

00

31

409

00

00

20

412¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

09

70

52

00

08

23

51

00

05

32

50

00

08

63

49

00

09

28

48

00

03

39

47

00

00

26

44

00

00

20

ygsth

2571

00

01

75

Fkkuk uacj&392

2572

00

00

20

2570

00

04

55

2573

00

03

45

2574

00

00

20

2569

00

11

64

2568

00

05

92

2567

00

04

90

2541

00

02

04

2542

00

13

34

2537¼ukyk½

00

01

87

2531

00

07

22

2530

00

00

20

2526

00

14

77

2529

00

11

48

2453

00

07

51

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4390

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2552

00

01

40

2450

00

01

92

2449

00

02

18

2448

00

05

32

2447

00

01

49

2454

00

11

99

2446

00

00

20

2445

00

00

20

2444

00

06

39

2443

00

00

20

2455

00

00

20

iwjSuk

807

00

00

20

Fkkuk uacj&383

802

00

04

62

804

00

09

38

803

00

03

05

801

00

04

09

773 ¼Mªsbu½

00

01

44

688

00

00

36

689

00

13

22

692

00

01

28

691

00

00

20

696¼jkLrk½

00

02

33

679

00

02

50

678

00

04

65

677

00

01

14

667

00

02

99

668

00

18

27

660

00

00

20

645

00

11

88

648

00

09

23

647

00

00

20

644

00

06

51

642

00

02

72

639

00

00

20

640

00

00

20

641

00

01

21

643

00

04

37

578

00

05

96

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4391

590

00

00

76

592

00

00

20

591

00

00

68

513

00

00

20

580

00

00

40

579

00

11

78

512

00

09

72

511

00

00

20

510

00

11

11

581

00

00

20

508

00

07

41

509

00

03

52

505

00

04

60

506

00

00

67

490

00

04

35

501

00

00

20

502

00

04

23

504

00

00

96

503

00

01

35

522 ¼ukyk½

00

00

84

ijkjh

767 ¼ukyk½

00

01

23

Fkkuk uacj&384

769

00

00

52

770

00

11

27

331

00

12

33

340

00

00

20

339

00

09

06

338

00

16

46

337

00

12

01

352

00

03

00

315

00

10

14

369

00

00

75

368

00

03

04

314

00

00

20

313

00

00

20

367

00

00

64

366

00

00

20

370

00

01

79

371

00

01

47

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4392

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

372

00

09

67

373

00

00

20

413

00

01

22

412

00

00

20

375

00

06

63

376

00

02

66

411

00

08

45

410

00

05

52

409

00

01

82

384

00

01

27

408

00

01

19

407

00

00

36

385

00

01

81

386

00

00

20

391

00

02

55

389

00

00

62

390

00

00

88

392

00

02

04

406

00

01

70

393

00

02

31

396

00

01

91

395

00

00

65

394

00

00

20

397

00

15

83

194@808

00

00

20

162

00

00

20

161

00

06

45

399

00

00

20

160

00

00

91

159

00

07

96

158

00

04

23

448

00

04

85

113

00

18

48

104

00

01

09

108

00

00

37

105

00

05

50

98@780

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4393

106

00

01

76

107

00

00

20

98@779

00

10

24

101

00

00

20

102

00

00

20

98@778

00

01

28

98

00

00

36

99

00

09

36

100

00

05

94

89

00

02

66

72

00

06

71

69

00

00

74

71

00

05

63

70

00

10

98

46

00

09

54

45

00

00

20

43

00

06

48

44

00

05

39

41

00

00

64

29

00

00

20

30

00

11

06

rsydkBq

3752

00

03

33

Fkkuk uacj&390

1199¼jkLrk½

00

01

31

1132

00

05

04

1131

00

14

83

1138

00

02

18

1137

00

11

07

1136

00

00

20

1141

00

02

24

1125

00

00

20

1142

00

09

92

1123

00

23

99

866

00

06

93

867

00

00

20

1119

00

07

73

876

00

16

06

882

00

02

02

881

00

05

61

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4394

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

876

00

00

45

883

00

00

20

880

00

06

70

895

00

01

13

879

00

02

69

892

00

02

59

893

00

14

01

894

00

01

14

896

00

04

28

897

00

01

65

898

00

00

20

943

00

00

20

900

00

01

61

901

00

00

20

904

00

03

92

899

00

02

48

905

00

01

08

903

00

03

00

906

00

01

14

932

00

05

76

930

00

00

20

931

00

05

49

933

00

00

20

926

00

00

77

934

00

02

00

925

00

07

03

924

00

00

96

920

00

02

13

921

00

04

26

922

00

03

23

923

00

00

76

592

00

00

20

598

00

07

10

597

00

01

86

595

00

02

23

594

00

00

20

480¼jkLrk½

00

02

94

785¼jkLrk½

00

00

20

600

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4395

601

00

00

20

602

00

05

29

614

00

08

83

611

00

00

20

626

00

01

39

625

00

00

20

612

00

00

20

613

00

00

67

610

00

00

20

628

00

01

54

627

00

01

48

623

00

02

20

633

00

03

90

622

00

00

20

632

00

01

92

629

00

00

20

630

00

00

20

631

00

00

20

634

00

01

83

635

00

01

11

636

00

04

17

642

00

00

20

473

00

00

20

639

00

00

20

637

00

01

96

638

00

00

20

640

00

00

20

472

00

08

97

460

00

00

20

471

00

01

20

470

00

13

54

465

00

01

40

469

00

10

53

468

00

04

53

431

00

02

18

430

00

00

97

jQhiwj

1135

00

02

68

Fkkuk uacj&386

1134

00

07

75

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4396

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1133

00

00

25

1127

00

05

01

1128

00

00

20

1126

00

04

36

1111

00

00

20

1125

00

07

08

1113

00

00

20

1124

00

01

28

1122

00

03

33

1123

00

00

51

1121

00

00

20

1120

00

04

91

1119

00

04

02

470

00

00

20

1091

00

01

83

471

00

03

02

472

00

02

51

473

00

01

85

474

00

00

20

481

00

03

17

480

00

07

22

484

00

00

20

479

00

00

20

485

00

01

24

486

00

01

11

491

00

04

60

492

00

01

97

493

00

00

20

490

00

03

47

489

00

02

42

550

00

00

20

488

00

00

20

494

00

01

12

495

00

04

87

496

00

02

34

497

00

03

76

506

00

02

99

507

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4397

498

00

00

20

505

00

08

85

509

00

00

20

504

00

00

29

510

00

05

89

512

00

01

64

513

00

03

50

514

00

01

45

515

00

00

20

511

00

03

56

516

00

03

91

517

00

00

20

519

00

06

32

520

00

04

92

522

00

04

83

585¼jkLrk½

00

04

48

523

00

03

56

171

00

00

46

170

00

00

20

169

00

05

56

112

00

06

03

111

00

00

20

113

00

15

99

114

00

00

20

96

00

01

33

95

00

00

80

94

00

00

20

76

00

11

01

75

00

00

20

77

00

08

70

78

00

00

20

74

00

13

08

72

00

02

71

73

00

07

79

57

00

02

93

68

00

01

35

58

00

08

27

61

00

07

33

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4398

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

62

00

00

20

59

00

03

32

60

00

02

56

5

00

10

71

4

00

02

42

¹iQk- la- vkj&25011@15@2013&vksvkj&Iº

iou oqQekj] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 5th August, 2013

S.O. 1626.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest

that a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited in Dist. Siwan in the State of Bihar for ‘Patna

to Motihari and Baitalpur Pipeline’ for the transportation of Petroleum Product;

And, whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary

to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which is described

in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals

Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares

its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on

which the copies of the notification issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the

Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user

therein for laying of the pipeline under the land, to Shri Arun Kumar Jha B.A.S. & Competent Authority, Indian Oil

Corporation Limited. (Pipelines Division), P.O. : Dhelwan, Sipara, Dist. Patna, (Bihar.) Pin-800020.

Encl. : Schedule

SCHEDULE

Dist. : Siwan

State : Bihar

Mouja / Village

Survey/BlockNo.

Sub-Div-No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

DAHKAI

401

00

03

53

Thana No. 231

402

00

00

20

400

00

06

01

397

00

01

84

398

00

07

06

395-Road

00

03

57

399

00

00

20

394

00

17

63

393

00

02

32

391

00

04

03

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4399

389

00

01

25

390

00

02

79

386

00

09

02

385

00

04

68

384

00

04

57

363

00

03

24

362

00

02

89

339

00

10

18

340

00

08

24

341

00

06

84

341/407

00

01

88

261

00

01

38

262

00

03

73

265

00

05

02

264

00

00

20

269

00

00

20

270

00

00

20

266

00

04

14

267

00

02

85

268

00

02

13

248

00

00

42

247

00

00

20

244

00

03

47

243

00

00

48

245

00

04

31

242

00

07

93

241

00

00

64

DAUN CHHAPRA

288

00

09

02

Thana No. 230

286

00

13

43

280

00

01

98

281

00

04

32

282

00

00

20

279

00

17

51

200-Road

00

01

40

196

00

01

46

193

00

17

63

194

00

03

17

70

00

00

63

71

00

00

20

69

00

03

16

67

00

02

87

66

00

01

86

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4400

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

65

00

02

10

63

00

04

01

62

00

08

60

59

00

04

04

58

00

04

15

56

00

05

15

57

00

02

21

55

00

00

20

60

00

00

20

54

00

05

77

MANCHHA

855

00

01

21

Thana No. 225

857

00

05

58

854

00

01

90

853

00

03

36

858

00

00

68

859

00

00

20

851

00

00

20

852

00

02

20

848

00

04

55

849

00

02

42

847

00

00

41

846

00

02

40

844

00

02

86

843

00

00

20

845

00

03

72

842

00

03

69

BHADEA

231

00

03

38

Thana No. 226

211

00

00

20

212

00

24

00

209

00

03

45

210

00

00

20

198

00

05

77

199

00

06

70

200

00

08

55

201

00

07

51

183

00

14

99

185

00

00

20

184

00

11

59

178

00

02

01

179

00

00

20

164

00

00

74

177

00

15

27

176

00

00

20

171

00

06

59

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4401

174

00

00

27

172

00

01

16

169

00

15

09

170

00

00

20

166

00

00

20

168

00

05

46

85

00

03

05

86

00

00

20

167

00

00

54

90

00

03

91

91

00

01

79

92

00

02

36

93

00

03

01

114

00

01

58

113

00

09

63

112

00

00

20

115

00

01

24

110

00

06

10

109

00

02

63

108

00

03

17

107

00

01

24

106

00

00

20

117

00

01

85

118

00

01

28

119

00

02

01

105

00

00

20

104

00

01

59

121

00

14

54

123

00

00

20

122

00

00

20

10

00

00

28

9

00

00

20

USTI

540

00

07

54

Thana No. 224

541

00

01

55

542

00

00

20

539

00

06

43

538

00

02

86

536

00

12

37

465

00

00

20

531

00

00

48

466

00

11

36

467

00

04

99

460

00

00

46

459

00

03

29

468

00

00

20

400/1910

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4402

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

458

00

08

51

456

00

00

47

457

00

00

20

455

00

04

71

454-Road

00

04

43

453

00

00

20

320

00

00

20

470

00

00

20

311-Road

00

00

20

312-Road

00

01

96

313

00

01

39

314-Road

00

03

86

317

00

00

20

315

00

06

55

295/1931

00

00

20

310

00

00

20

316

00

00

40

291

00

00

20

290

00

02

33

289

00

05

48

288

00

06

61

287

00

04

47

284

00

00

20

286

00

04

61

190

00

00

20

191

00

00

29

192

00

00

61

193

00

01

43

194

00

06

60

195

00

03

68

196

00

03

52

199

00

00

20

198

00

02

82

197-Cart Track

00

04

40

200-Cart Track

00

04

14

201-Cart Track

00

00

42

202

00

00

20

89

00

00

20

88

00

02

06

84

00

04

62

83

00

06

53

78

00

01

74

76

00

00

20

82

00

02

55

81

00

03

40

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4403

79

00

07

32

74

00

01

54

72

00

00

20

80

00

11

54

MAHUAL

1005

00

00

20

Thana No. 202

1004

00

06

23

1003

00

06

82

1000

00

00

20

1001

00

00

20

999

00

16

81

992

00

05

93

973

00

08

12

974

00

00

38

975

00

09

02

977

00

00

20

986

00

01

93

981

00

10

71

984

00

00

20

983

00

00

39

982

00

04

99

947

00

06

71

946

00

11

21

945

00

04

08

940

00

02

06

941

00

00

20

865(ROAD)

00

01

42

857

00

00

20

858

00

05

89

859

00

06

15

860

00

00

35

861

00

00

20

815

00

02

78

816

00

00

20

814

00

07

32

813

00

07

20

819

00

00

38

823

00

06

10

806

00

00

20

822

00

02

28

805

00

01

90

824

00

01

99

804

00

02

08

801

00

03

87

800

00

03

80

799

00

08

60

798

00

00

97

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4404

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

MAHUAL

797

00

00

20

Thana No. 202

752

00

01

42

793

00

14

50

792

00

01

91

790

00

13

20

787

00

07

13

788

00

01

38

783

00

05

49

784

00

00

20

782

00

00

58

499

00

04

40

780

00

01

19

779

00

00

81

500

00

06

84

778

00

00

20

501

00

02

30

777

00

00

62

503

00

05

96

510

00

02

80

504

00

00

74

506

00

01

27

505

00

00

20

507

00

03

31

508

00

00

36

509

00

00

20

543

00

05

19

546

00

05

55

545

00

01

01

547

00

06

64

548

00

04

38

497(ROAD)

00

01

69

483

00

00

00

556

00

00

20

480

00

00

20

479

00

01

38

478

00

01

73

477

00

06

26

475

00

03

30

474

00

02

87

463

00

04

19

452

00

02

12

451

00

01

24

450

00

01

07

449

00

00

65

448

00

00

20

453

00

00

83

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4405

MAHUAL

454

00

02

17

Thana No. 202

447

00

03

94

446

00

00

24

442

00

00

51

441

00

00

96

433

00

00

70

434

00

02

90

432

00

04

14

408

00

00

77

407

00

00

20

409

00

03

13

403

00

08

75

402

00

00

20

400/2802

00

00

20

369

00

00

27

401

00

08

40

400

00

03

61

394

00

03

45

393

00

00

20

395

00

06

43

396

00

06

98

397

00

00

20

391

00

00

43

MIRACHAK

361

00

01

41

Thana No. 199

362

00

00

20

367

00

00

20

360

00

02

97

359

00

01

31

358

00

00

71

356

00

03

09

354

00

03

18

355

00

00

20

353

00

06

23

348

00

10

16

210

00

00

20

211

00

00

20

209

00

00

54

207

00

01

20

208

00

05

68

214

00

05

10

206

00

00

20

215

00

04

46

204

00

00

20

216

00

06

16

217

00

09

59

218

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4406

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

219

00

07

77

220

00

04

70

179(ROAD)

00

01

52

189

00

02

17

188

00

00

85

187

00

01

14

186

00

00

78

190

00

00

20

185

00

03

74

184

00

02

01

183

00

00

20

180

00

23

07

38

00

01

68

39

00

05

20

37

00

00

20

36

00

02

02

34

00

02

25

35

00

03

10

MANDRA PALI

1378

00

00

61

Thana No. 394

1377

00

22

37

1375

00

09

35

1376

00

13

79

1372

00

08

83

1371

00

04

61

1368

00

00

20

1367

00

05

20

1363

00

00

92

1361

00

03

48

1362

00

02

04

1360

00

02

58

1359

00

00

20

1154

00

00

20

1155

00

00

87

1156

00

03

83

1157

00

06

64

1160

00

00

27

1159

00

02

43

1158

00

00

39

1164

00

11

04

1165

00

07

33

1175

00

00

29

1175/1897

00

01

09

1174

00

03

60

1167

00

00

20

1173

00

07

06

1169

00

09

40

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4407

MANDRA PALI

1137

00

00

36

Thana No. 394

1136

00

03

49

1024

00

07

24

1025(ROAD)

00

01

89

1028

00

13

33

1032

00

17

53

1034

00

05

51

1033

00

03

47

1036

00

02

20

1037

00

02

09

1040

00

00

90

1039

00

02

91

1045

00

08

50

1044

00

01

94

1043

00

01

20

1046(ROAD)

00

02

44

316

00

11

28

317

00

00

20

315

00

09

82

313

00

01

53

322

00

05

07

323

00

01

06

325

00

03

56

327

00

11

86

328

00

09

70

334

00

00

87

335

00

06

39

337(ROAD)

00

01

97

393(ROAD)

00

00

20

383

00

09

78

366

00

08

78

382

00

03

09

367

00

10

24

368

00

02

93

369

00

05

11

362

00

06

86

361

00

07

41

357

00

00

20

355

00

11

94

354

00

16

27

349

00

03

16

348

00

02

07

347

00

07

15

346

00

18

27

345

00

03

33

72

00

02

86

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4408

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

71

00

03

80

70

00

02

53

69

00

01

21

68

00

00

78

67

00

00

64

66

00

00

20

64

00

00

20

73

00

13

01

49

00

13

47

50

00

06

10

51

00

03

11

48

00

31

26

41

00

01

83

MANDARAULI

1985

00

00

20

Thana No. 393

1984

00

09

27

1983

00

06

96

1973

00

03

07

1972

00

00

20

1974

00

09

56

1975

00

03

04

1942

00

14

99

1971

00

00

20

1934

00

06

60

1943

00

00

20

1935

00

03

23

1933

00

01

91

1932

00

13

75

1896

00

07

63

1923

00

00

20

1921

00

00

20

1898

00

00

20

1922

00

00

35

1897

00

03

20

1887

00

06

47

1885

00

02

53

1886

00

08

27

1862

00

00

20

1884

00

01

98

1883

00

00

85

1881

00

00

20

1882

00

01

24

1863

00

02

48

1867

00

02

54

1868

00

00

20

1864

00

05

26

1866(ROAD)

00

03

30

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4409

946

00

11

07

936

00

00

20

932

00

00

20

937

00

05

10

931

00

05

95

422(ROAD)

00

04

15

350

00

20

39

380

00

00

20

381

00

04

90

382

00

06

40

394

00

08

52

393

00

01

41

392

00

00

20

391(CART TRACK)

00

01

66

53

00

03

28

402

00

01

96

408

00

00

31

409

00

00

20

412(CART TRACK)

00

09

70

52

00

08

23

51

00

05

32

50

00

08

63

49

00

09

28

48

00

03

39

47

00

00

26

44

00

00

20

LAHEJI

2571

00

01

75

Thana No. 392

2572

00

00

20

2570

00

04

55

2573

00

03

45

2574

00

00

20

2569

00

11

64

2568

00

05

92

2567

00

04

90

2541

00

02

04

2542

00

13

34

2537(NALA)

00

01

87

2531

00

07

22

2530

00

00

20

2526

00

14

77

2529

00

11

48

2453

00

07

51

2552

00

01

40

2450

00

01

92

2449

00

02

18

2448

00

05

32

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4410

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2447

00

01

49

2454

00

11

99

2446

00

00

20

2445

00

00

20

2444

00

06

39

2443

00

00

20

2455

00

00

20

PURAINA

807

00

00

20

Thana No. 383

802

00

04

62

804

00

09

38

803

00

03

05

801

00

04

09

773(Drain)

00

01

44

688

00

00

36

689

00

13

22

692

00

01

28

691

00

00

20

696(ROAD)

00

02

33

679

00

02

50

678

00

04

65

677

00

01

14

667

00

02

99

668

00

18

27

660

00

00

20

645

00

11

88

648

00

09

23

647

00

00

20

644

00

06

51

642

00

02

72

639

00

00

20

640

00

00

20

641

00

01

21

643

00

04

37

578

00

05

96

590

00

00

76

592

00

00

20

591

00

00

68

513

00

00

20

580

00

00

40

579

00

11

78

512

00

09

72

511

00

00

20

510

00

11

11

581

00

00

20

508

00

07

41

509

00

03

52

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4411

505

00

04

60

506

00

00

67

490

00

04

35

501

00

00

20

502

00

04

23

504

00

00

96

503

00

01

35

522(NALA)

00

00

84

PARARI

767(NALA)

00

01

23

Thana No. 384

769

00

00

52

770

00

11

27

331

00

12

33

340

00

00

20

339

00

09

06

338

00

16

46

337

00

12

01

352

00

03

00

315

00

10

14

369

00

00

75

368

00

03

04

314

00

00

20

313

00

00

20

367

00

00

64

366

00

00

20

370

00

01

79

371

00

01

47

372

00

09

67

373

00

00

20

413

00

01

22

412

00

00

20

375

00

06

63

376

00

02

66

411

00

08

45

410

00

05

52

409

00

01

82

384

00

01

27

408

00

01

19

407

00

00

36

385

00

01

81

386

00

00

20

391

00

02

55

389

00

00

62

390

00

00

88

392

00

02

04

406

00

01

70

393

00

02

31

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4412

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

PARARI

396

00

01

91

Thana No. 384

395

00

00

65

394

00

00

20

397

00

15

83

194/808

00

00

20

162

00

00

20

161

00

06

45

399

00

00

20

160

00

00

91

159

00

07

96

158

00

04

23

448

00

04

85

113

00

18

48

104

00

01

09

108

00

00

37

105

00

05

50

98/780

00

00

20

106

00

01

76

107

00

00

20

98/779

00

10

24

101

00

00

20

102

00

00

20

98/778

00

01

28

98

00

00

36

99

00

09

36

100

00

05

94

89

00

02

66

72

00

06

71

69

00

00

74

71

00

05

63

70

00

10

98

46

00

09

54

45

00

00

20

43

00

06

48

44

00

05

39

41

00

00

64

29

00

00

20

30

00

11

06

TELKATHU

3752

00

03

33

Thana No. 390

1199(ROAD)

00

01

31

1132

00

05

04

1131

00

14

83

1138

00

02

18

1137

00

11

07

1136

00

00

20

1141

00

02

24

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4413

TELKATHU

1125

00

00

20

Thana No. 390

1142

00

09

92

1123

00

23

99

866

00

06

93

867

00

00

20

1119

00

07

73

876

00

16

06

882

00

02

02

881

00

05

61

876

00

00

45

883

00

00

20

880

00

06

70

895

00

01

13

879

00

02

69

892

00

02

59

893

00

14

01

894

00

01

14

896

00

04

28

897

00

01

65

898

00

00

20

943

00

00

20

900

00

01

61

901

00

00

20

904

00

03

92

899

00

02

48

905

00

01

08

903

00

03

00

906

00

01

14

932

00

05

76

930

00

00

20

931

00

05

49

933

00

00

20

926

00

00

77

934

00

02

00

925

00

07

03

924

00

00

96

920

00

02

13

921

00

04

26

922

00

03

23

923

00

00

76

592

00

00

20

598

00

07

10

597

00

01

86

595

00

02

23

594

00

00

20

480(ROAD)

00

02

94

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4414

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

TELKATHU

785(ROAD)

00

00

20

Thana No. 390

600

00

00

20

601

00

00

20

602

00

05

29

614

00

08

83

611

00

00

20

626

00

01

39

625

00

00

20

612

00

00

20

613

00

00

67

610

00

00

20

628

00

01

54

627

00

01

48

623

00

02

20

633

00

03

90

622

00

00

20

632

00

01

92

629

00

00

20

630

00

00

20

631

00

00

20

634

00

01

83

635

00

01

11

636

00

04

17

642

00

00

20

473

00

00

20

639

00

00

20

637

00

01

96

638

00

00

20

640

00

00

20

472

00

08

97

460

00

00

20

471

00

01

20

470

00

13

54

465

00

01

40

469

00

10

53

468

00

04

53

431

00

02

18

430

00

00

97

RAFIPUR

1135

00

02

68

Thana No. 386

1134

00

07

75

1133

00

00

25

1127

00

05

01

1128

00

00

20

1126

00

04

36

1111

00

00

20

1125

00

07

08

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4415

RAFIPUR

1113

00

00

20

Thana No. 386

1124

00

01

28

1122

00

03

33

1123

00

00

51

1121

00

00

20

1120

00

04

91

1119

00

04

02

470

00

00

20

1091

00

01

83

471

00

03

02

472

00

02

51

473

00

01

85

474

00

00

20

481

00

03

17

480

00

07

22

484

00

00

20

479

00

00

20

485

00

01

24

486

00

01

11

491

00

04

60

492

00

01

97

493

00

00

20

490

00

03

47

489

00

02

42

550

00

00

20

488

00

00

20

494

00

01

12

495

00

04

87

496

00

02

34

497

00

03

76

506

00

02

99

507

00

00

20

498

00

00

20

505

00

08

85

509

00

00

20

504

00

00

29

510

00

05

89

512

00

01

64

513

00

03

50

514

00

01

45

515

00

00

20

511

00

03

56

516

00

03

91

517

00

00

20

519

00

06

32

520

00

04

92

RAFIPUR

522

00

04

83

Thana No. 386

585 (ROAD)

00

04

48

523

00

03

56

171

00

00

46

170

00

00

20

169

00

05

56

112

00

06

03

111

00

00

20

113

00

15

99

114

00

00

20

96

00

01

33

95

00

00

80

94

00

00

20

76

00

11

01

75

00

00

20

77

00

08

70

78

00

00

20

74

00

13

08

72

00

02

71

73

00

07

79

57

00

02

93

68

00

01

35

58

00

08

27

61

00

07

33

62

00

00

20

59

00

03

32

60

00

02

56

5

00

10

71

4

00

02

42

[F. No. R-25011/15/2013-OR-I]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

4416

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

ubZ fnYyh] 5 vxLr] 2013

dk-vk- 1627-—dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slk izrhr gksrk gS fd yksd fgr esa ;g vko”;d gS fd iVuk ls eksfrgkjh vkSj csrkyiqj

rd isVªksfy;e inkFkksZ ds ifjogu gsrq ftyk floku] jkT; fcgkj esa bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs”ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkuh

pkfg, A

vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slh ikbiykbu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, vko”;d izrhr gksrk gS fd ml Hkwfe esa ftlds Hkhrj

mDr ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkus dk izLrko gS vkSj tks bl vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa of.kZr gS] mi;ksx dk vtZu fd;k tk,(

vr% vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] iSVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbUl ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½ vf/kfu;e] 1962 ¼1962

dk 50½ dh /kkjk 3 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk iznÙk “kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] mDr Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/akdkj dk vtZu djus ds vius

vk”k; dh ?kks’k.kk djrh gS(

dksbZ O;fDr] tks mDr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa fgrc) gS] ml rkjh[k ls ftldks] Hkkjr ds jkti= esa ;Fkk izdkf”kr bl

vfèklwpuk dh izfr;ka lk/kkj.k turk dks miyC/k djk nh tkrh gS] bDdhl fnu ds vUnj] Hkwfe ds Hkhrj ikbiykbu fcNk, tkus gsrq

mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj ds vtZu ds fy,] Jh v:.k dqekj >k] fc-iz-ls- o l{ke izkf/kdkjh bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs”ku fyfeVsM] ¼ikbiykbu

fMohtu½ iVuk] iks-vks- <syok] flikjk] ftyk iVuk] fiu% 800020] fcgkj dks fyf[kr :i eas vk{ksi Hkst ldsxkA

vuqlwph

rglhy % floku

jkT; % fcgkj

ekStk@xzke

losZ@Cykd@la- (IyksV la-)

lc&Mho&la-

{ks=kiQy

gsDVs;j

vkjs

oxZ ehVj

1

2

3

4

5

6

edqaniwj

469

00

00

27

Fkkuk uacj&157

470

00

00

20

468

00

00

91

467

00

01

28

466

00

01

75

462

00

03

93

463

00

00

20

461

00

02

39

460

00

02

46

457

00

00

20

459

00

00

79

458

00

04

78

454

00

00

20

450 ¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

09

50

36

00

05

38

37

00

00

29

35

00

21

10

40

00

01

40

34

00

09

45

41

00

00

20

33

00

02

08

32

00

00

40

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4417

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4418

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

52

00

02

92

82

00

03

83

31

00

00

20

30

00

06

18

23

00

08

12

25

00

00

20

24

00

03

63

22

00

05

61

27

00

00

20

21

00

03

72

16

00

00

20

28

00

00

20

20

00

01

68

18

00

01

91

17

00

00

20

19

00

03

01

9

00

03

31

8

00

00

20

Hkyqvk eqdqan

405

00

00

20

Fkkuk uacj&158

404

00

00

20

403

00

00

20

266

00

00

20

81

00

09

69

85

00

00

20

82

00

01

90

83

00

00

20

84

00

00

20

80

00

01

36

78

00

02

78

77@454

00

04

03

76

00

14

85

75

00

00

20

74

00

04

24

73@455

00

02

74

72

00

06

97

70

00

02

71

71

00

03

61

69

00

03

86

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4419

68

00

00

20

63

00

00

34

62

00

00

20

uan ikyh

324

00

00

20

Fkkuk uacj&159

319

00

02

62

318

00

05

63

317

00

00

20

297

00

15

67

298

00

02

44

296

00

19

17

267

00

02

15

268

00

06

53

598

00

09

56

261

00

02

32

265

00

16

79

262

00

04

25

263

00

01

78

264

00

08

34

thjksnsbZ

1990

00

03

98

Fkkuk uacj&152

1988

00

01

52

1991

00

00

20

lwjoky

1625 ¼jkLrk½

00

00

20

Fkkuk uacj&139

2285¼jkLrk½

00

01

24

2287¼jkLrk½

00

02

18

2261

00

02

53

2257

00

05

02

2260

00

07

57

2259

00

00

62

2251

00

16

04

2250

00

18

31

2241

00

11

97

2242

00

00

20

2223

00

36

98

2163

00

16

81

2162

00

00

20

2161

00

00

39

2164

00

13

58

2165

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4420

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2160

00

02

23

2159

00

00

20

2157

00

04

45

2166

00

11

17

2156

00

04

37

2167

00

02

53

2168

00

13

51

2154

00

00

49

2153

00

00

43

2169

00

06

61

2152

00

00

90

2170

00

05

89

2171

00

04

84

2172

00

02

79

2151

00

01

19

2150

00

01

37

2173

00

03

04

2149

00

01

43

2174

00

02

59

2148

00

04

63

2175

00

02

34

2146¼jkLrk½

00

01

70

2143

00

08

02

2142

00

10

03

2125

00

18

00

2124

00

09

09

2123

00

00

20

2117

00

00

20

2116

00

04

31

2115

00

04

79

2114

00

18

53

2030

00

00

20

2031

00

00

20

2032

00

00

20

2033

00

00

20

2113

00

00

20

2069

00

08

97

2070

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4421

2068

00

00

20

2067

00

00

20

2066

00

00

20

748

00

10

05

781

00

00

20

774

00

02

95

775

00

00

20

773

00

07

76

769

00

01

72

772

00

00

20

771

00

00

20

770

00

00

20

767

00

02

31

763

00

07

58

765

00

12

56

764

00

00

20

659 ¼jkLrk½

00

01

43

652

00

01

32

653

00

05

88

651

00

00

20

656

00

01

58

655

00

01

72

654

00

04

38

657

00

00

20

629

00

01

68

628

00

02

41

626

00

11

24

627

00

00

20

630

00

00

20

625

00

00

20

624

00

00

20

384

00

03

76

385

00

07

62

374

00

00

20

386 ¼jkLrk½

00

00

20

397

00

03

97

398

00

04

90

399

00

02

67

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4422

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

402

00

02

37

403

00

02

42

408

00

02

46

409

00

00

20

410

00

02

58

413

00

03

43

415

00

02

13

420

00

00

20

421

00

06

60

422

00

02

95

439

00

02

70

423

00

04

33

438

00

02

93

437

00

00

76

428

00

00

20

436

00

09

02

434

00

09

67

435

00

00

20

432

00

05

60

433

00

11

08

462

00

00

20

464

00

03

88

483

00

00

20

484

00

05

86

485

00

03

78

486

00

00

20

463

00

00

31

492

00

01

27

488

00

03

10

491

00

02

20

494

00

00

20

490

00

02

49

489

00

01

71

495

00

02

02

477

00

01

37

476

00

00

42

475

00

00

20

496

00

05

54

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4423

497

00

00

85

500 ¼jkLrk½

00

01

53

46

00

08

43

63

00

00

20

64

00

12

45

45

00

09

85

43

00

00

20

42

00

00

20

44

00

02

44

eqbZu

2913

00

05

31

Fkkuk uacj&137

2924

00

00

20

2912

00

02

94

2914

00

02

65

2915

00

06

03

2916

00

03

45

2917

00

06

75

2918

00

04

61

2919

00

03

83

2920

00

07

44

2909

00

00

20

2857

00

09

33

2904

00

09

06

2903

00

00

97

2901

00

00

20

2902

00

02

74

2863

00

00

20

2864

00

00

20

2869

00

07

36

2868

00

07

17

2867

00

11

58

2871

00

00

20

2653

00

01

02

2652

00

16

11

2676

00

00

20

2677

00

00

20

2678

00

03

12

2679

00

05

24

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4424

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2680

00

04

26

2651

00

00

20

2650

00

01

27

2681

00

10

72

2698

00

00

20

2697

00

00

20

2682

00

01

48

2683

00

00

50

2684

00

11

06

2686

00

05

42

2687

00

00

20

2691

00

00

20

2688

00

03

92

2638

00

00

20

2637

00

10

60

2689

00

00

20

2690

00

00

20

2634

00

00

20

2632

00

00

20

2636

00

02

86

2635

00

05

37

2628

00

02

84

2629

00

06

61

2630

00

00

88

2627

00

01

24

2624

00

14

18

2625

00

22

89

1499

00

02

96

1500

00

00

60

1509

00

05

82

1498

00

00

20

1510

00

00

20

1511

00

00

20

1508

00

10

19

1507

00

00

20

1505

00

00

20

2021¼ukyk½

00

01

81

1512

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4425

2023

00

14

25

2022

00

02

83

2024

00

01

47

2020

00

04

14

2018

00

16

31

2019

00

00

20

2017

00

00

41

2011

00

08

67

2012

00

00

20

2006

00

06

15

2007¼ukyk½

00

01

62

1863

00

00

20

1881

00

00

20

1882

00

04

46

1883

00

06

59

1885

00

00

54

1884

00

03

72

1886

00

00

46

1887

00

00

20

1880

00

09

96

1878

00

06

97

1877

00

00

20

1879

00

00

20

1872

00

10

55

1873

00

06

05

1828

00

07

69

1827

00

00

20

1829

00

02

61

1830

00

02

60

1750 ¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

00

20

1826

00

03

66

1825

00

01

14

1823

00

00

20

1822

00

00

20

1821

00

00

20

1820

00

00

20

1824

00

04

38

1751

00

12

05

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4426

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1755

00

13

79

1760

00

01

35

1759

00

09

60

1756

00

00

20

1762

00

00

20

1758

00

06

80

1763

00

08

72

1757¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

00

20

75

00

00

20

74

00

00

20

72

00

00

20

1766

00

06

28

73

00

04

28

1767

00

02

68

1768

00

00

20

1770

00

09

85

1771

00

08

33

22

00

00

42

18

00

01

33

1772

00

09

72

19

00

00

20

17

00

06

95

1773

00

02

89

1774

00

00

20

16

00

05

48

15

00

04

31

10

00

12

83

11

00

08

11

13

00

01

92

14

00

00

20

12

00

00

97

8

00

11

10

7

00

05

48

2

00

04

90

1

00

00

20

VhVjk

1848

00

04

66

Fkkuk uacj&75

1846

00

00

20

1849

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4427

1845

00

05

61

1844

00

07

30

1843

00

00

20

1842

00

10

54

1838

00

00

20

1841

00

01

72

1840

00

00

25

fct;iwj

793

00

13

92

Fkkuk uacj&136

792

00

05

89

791

00

02

36

790

00

00

20

788

00

01

65

798

00

00

79

785

00

08

07

784

00

16

14

783

00

09

33

807

00

00

20

829

00

06

98

781

00

00

20

780

00

16

85

777

00

10

56

776

00

08

16

772

00

03

31

771

00

05

19

770

00

05

03

769

00

00

20

768

00

03

30

767

00

00

20

766

00

10

09

765

00

05

67

849

00

04

48

764

00

00

20

751

00

04

64

752

00

00

20

750

00

12

19

749

00

01

23

748

00

00

20

747

00

01

38

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4428

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

741

00

19

40

754

00

00

20

740

00

03

72

738

00

07

46

737

00

00

57

736

00

06

69

735

00

01

82

734

00

00

20

iks[kjsjk

1147

00

00

66

Fkkuk uacj&76

1148

00

00

20

1135

00

04

06

1190

00

06

07

1191

00

02

80

1134

00

07

79

1126

00

09

28

1111

00

01

02

1110

00

01

60

1104

00

00

20

1101

00

00

20

1112

00

03

90

1113

00

06

39

1114

00

06

15

1115

00

00

20

1100

00

01

61

1099

00

06

27

1098

00

00

20

1096

00

06

41

1094¼jkLrk½

00

02

19

1082

00

01

49

1083

00

09

65

1084

00

02

35

1075

00

13

33

1074

00

00

20

1064@1186

00

00

20

1065

00

06

75

1066

00

01

25

1064

00

00

45

1059

00

12

39

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4429

1058

00

00

91

1057

00

05

18

1055

00

07

06

1054

00

00

20

1049

00

00

20

1053

00

05

79

1052

00

06

26

1042

00

16

12

1040

00

10

23

1039

00

06

58

1037

00

02

11

1038

00

00

91

1032

00

02

73

1033

00

00

20

1031

00

06

85

1030

00

00

20

1021

00

05

06

1029

00

12

01

1022

00

09

86

1028

00

00

20

1017

00

16

59

1013

00

02

43

1014

00

09

57

1015

00

00

20

1016

00

00

20

dqynhik

409

00

02

40

Fkkuk uacj&77

410

00

08

98

411

00

00

78

412

00

02

75

406

00

00

20

413

00

04

15

405

00

01

79

414

00

00

38

392

00

06

76

393

00

00

20

376

00

00

44

377

00

02

10

391

00

01

56

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4430

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

383

00

05

45

382

00

03

80

381

00

04

27

380

00

02

93

379

00

02

71

378

00

02

00

293

00

14

39

292

00

00

20

360

00

00

20

359

00

01

41

296

00

07

27

295

00

00

20

299

00

06

84

300

00

03

87

304

00

09

05

306

00

06

75

305

00

00

20

307

00

06

64

yNehiwj

1287

00

01

49

Fkkuk uacj&78

1288

00

16

26

1289

00

00

20

1290

00

01

71

1292

00

00

89

1293

00

01

14

1294

00

00

32

1296

00

00

20

1291

00

11

19

1372

00

00

20

1342

00

13

47

1341

00

00

20

1340

00

00

20

1339

00

00

20

1346

00

14

99

1338

00

14

43

1348

00

00

20

1337

00

01

94

1336

00

04

81

1276 ¼jsyos½

00

06

33

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4431

1262@1408¼jsyos½

00

01

25

1172@1407¼jsyos½

00

01

03

1171@1409¼jsyos½

00

04

37

1171¼jkLrk½

00

04

29

1107

00

05

89

1167

00

00

47

1168

00

00

20

1108

00

01

47

1109

00

01

64

1110

00

01

66

1111

00

01

87

1115

00

00

20

1113

00

00

59

1112

00

01

02

1166

00

03

94

1165

00

04

21

1164

00

04

19

191

00

03

85

192

00

03

93

193

00

00

94

194

00

04

91

195

00

00

77

196

00

14

27

205

00

00

20

198

00

01

88

200

00

04

93

199

00

04

51

158

00

00

91

157

00

08

37

154

00

04

18

156

00

00

20

155

00

03

15

153

00

00

20

151

00

12

25

150

00

00

20

70

00

12

66

69

00

00

46

71

00

02

09

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4432

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

68

00

08

85

67

00

00

20

66

00

03

99

72

00

02

51

78 ¼jkLrk½

00

02

22

65¼jkLrk½

00

00

20

81

00

02

55

82

00

00

20

80

00

06

78

97¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

02

33

98@1402

00

01

83

108

00

07

62

109

00

00

20

101

00

01

09

102

00

01

11

103

00

00

76

104

00

00

20

107

00

09

75

106

00

12

74

csykliqj

220

00

03

13

Fkkuk uacj&79

221

00

02

88

219

00

00

20

225

00

04

31

226

00

02

64

227

00

00

20

218

00

07

57

217

00

00

20

247

00

00

20

248

00

00

20

241

00

00

53

240

00

00

20

246

00

04

93

245

00

04

87

250

00

00

20

251

00

00

20

253

00

00

29

254

00

00

26

252

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4433

244

00

03

16

255

00

02

64

256

00

00

20

257

00

00

20

243

00

01

89

242

00

00

20

259

00

04

46

258

00

00

46

260

00

00

93

261

00

04

78

262

00

02

65

267

00

00

27

268

00

00

20

269

00

00

20

266

00

01

60

272

00

00

20

273

00

00

20

265

00

02

27

264

00

03

45

263

00

00

99

164

00

00

20

275

00

02

39

274

00

00

20

276

00

00

20

163

00

07

68

166

00

04

69

162

00

03

71

161@462

00

00

20

157@461

00

00

20

161

00

03

93

157

00

07

53

156

00

08

82

149

00

00

50

148

00

00

20

155

00

00

20

144

00

02

07

154

00

08

39

194¼jsyos½

00

06

00

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4434

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

lsorkiwj

2393¼jkLrk½

00

01

22

Fkkuk uacj&44

2390

00

03

79

2392

00

02

91

2304

00

13

09

2391

00

01

24

2303

00

01

49

2302

00

13

33

2301

00

02

03

2394 jkLrk

00

02

57

2289

00

00

20

2290

00

04

40

2291&dPpk jkLrk

00

00

20

2267

00

15

74

2266

00

07

72

2268

00

00

20

2264

00

00

98

2265

00

01

39

2263

00

02

44

2262

00

07

41

2261

00

03

98

2260

00

00

79

2217¼jkLrk½

00

04

60

2215

00

00

20

2214

00

01

98

2213

00

03

75

2212

00

01

27

2211

00

04

41

2177

00

00

20

2210

00

04

44

2187

00

03

86

2186

00

04

00

2185

00

05

16

2184

00

07

12

2183

00

00

20

2182

00

00

20

2179

00

01

75

2178

00

01

17

2180

00

01

98

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4435

2181

00

02

39

2103¼jkLrk½

00

01

46

2103@4746

00

09

16

2068

00

00

37

2072

00

00

67

2071

00

04

66

2073

00

00

20

2074

00

06

24

2075

00

00

20

2079

00

02

15

2078

00

01

95

2080

00

00

20

2081

00

03

31

2083

00

03

77

2089

00

00

20

2088

00

09

14

2087

00

03

63

2091

00

00

63

2086

00

00

20

2092

00

12

25

2093

00

00

20

1982

00

16

72

1981

00

03

89

1769¼jkLrk½

00

01

72

539

00

04

56

547

00

03

96

540

00

00

36

548

00

00

36

546

00

06

18

545

00

02

65

549

00

05

02

550

00

01

72

551

00

03

37

552

00

06

26

556

00

04

81

553

00

00

31

553@4707

00

02

68

555

00

06

73

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4436

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

554

00

01

40

566

00

03

22

567

00

00

84

565

00

11

51

568

00

01

27

564

00

00

30

562

00

01

14

570

00

08

14

571

00

00

20

563

00

00

20

575

00

07

34

574

00

00

59

576

00

02

86

579

00

03

62

580

00

03

73

578

00

00

79

614

00

00

20

647

00

03

64

646

00

02

79

645

00

02

91

643

00

01

32

644

00

08

06

725

00

00

20

642

00

01

87

641

00

01

83

640

00

00

20

726

00

06

01

723

00

00

62

727

00

09

71

728

00

01

61

735

00

00

74

734

00

06

47

733

00

05

32

745

00

00

20

746

00

01

24

751

00

05

53

750

00

10

30

752

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4437

761

00

16

46

762

00

00

20

763

00

00

20

764¼jkLrk½

00

03

30

772

00

03

74

773

00

00

20

771

00

02

03

774

00

04

46

770

00

00

20

769

00

00

20

775

00

05

79

776

00

00

35

777

00

01

00

284

00

00

20

278

00

11

55

279

00

00

82

277

00

04

45

276

00

04

41

280

00

00

20

275

00

03

06

268

00

06

23

266

00

05

32

265

00

02

08

264

00

02

71

263

00

08

93

154

00

01

24

262

00

05

56

165

00

02

25

248

00

00

20

166

00

05

28

167

00

00

20

247

00

02

41

168

00

07

35

169

00

05

64

170@4702

00

00

20

242

00

00

99

241

00

07

77

240

00

01

82

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4438

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

239

00

08

40

237

00

12

38

236

00

00

20

233

00

02

26

234

00

27

92

231

00

06

84

186&dPpk jkLrk

00

03

15

188

00

04

46

353 ¼unh½

00

06

57

¹iQk- la- vkj&25011@15@2013&vksvkj&Iº

iou oqQekj] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 5th August, 2013

S.O. 1627.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest

that a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited in Dist. Siwan in the State of Bihar for ‘Patna

to Motihari and Baitalpur Pipeline’ for the transportation of Petroleum Product;

And, whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is

necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which

is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and

Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby

declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the

date on which the copies of the notification issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as

published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of

the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land, to Shri Arun Kumar Jha B.A.S. & Competent

Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited. (Pipelines Division) P.O. Dhelwan, Sipara, Dist. Patna (Bihar.)

Pin – 800020.

SCHEDULE

Dist.: Siwan

State : Bihar

Mouja / Village

Survey/Block No.

Sub-Div-No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

MAKUNDPUR

469

00

00

27

Thana No-157

470

00

00

20

468

00

00

91

467

00

01

28

466

00

01

75

462

00

03

93

463

00

00

20

461

00

02

39

460

00

02

46

457

00

00

20

459

00

00

79

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4439

458

00

04

78

454

00

00

20

450 (Cart Track)

00

09

50

36

00

05

38

37

00

00

29

35

00

21

10

40

00

01

40

34

00

09

45

41

00

00

20

33

00

02

08

32

00

00

40

52

00

02

92

82

00

03

83

31

00

00

20

30

00

06

18

23

00

08

12

25

00

00

20

24

00

03

63

22

00

05

61

27

00

00

20

21

00

03

72

16

00

00

20

28

00

00

20

20

00

01

68

18

00

01

91

17

00

00

20

19

00

03

01

9

00

03

31

8

00

00

20

BHALUA MUKUND

405

00

00

20

Thana No-158

404

00

00

20

403

00

00

20

266

00

00

20

81

00

09

69

85

00

00

20

82

00

01

90

83

00

00

20

84

00

00

20

80

00

01

36

78

00

02

78

77/454

00

04

03

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4440

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

76

00

14

85

75

00

00

20

74

00

04

24

73/455

00

02

74

72

00

06

97

70

00

02

71

71

00

03

61

69

00

03

86

68

00

00

20

63

00

00

34

62

00

00

20

NAND PALI

324

00

00

20

Thana No-159

319

00

02

62

318

00

05

63

317

00

00

20

297

00

15

67

298

00

02

44

296

00

19

17

267

00

02

15

268

00

06

53

598

00

09

56

261

00

02

32

265

00

16

79

262

00

04

25

263

00

01

78

264

00

08

34

JIRADEI

1990

00

03

98

Thana No-152

1988

00

01

52

1991

00

00

20

SURWAL

1625 (ROAD)

00

00

20

Thana No-139

2285 (ROAD)

00

01

24

2287 (ROAD)

00

02

18

2261

00

02

53

2257

00

05

02

2260

00

07

57

2259

00

00

62

2251

00

16

04

2250

00

18

31

2241

00

11

97

2242

00

00

20

2223

00

36

98

2163

00

16

81

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4441

2162

00

00

20

2161

00

00

39

2164

00

13

58

2165

00

00

20

2160

00

02

23

2159

00

00

20

2157

00

04

45

2166

00

11

17

2156

00

04

37

2167

00

02

53

2168

00

13

51

2154

00

00

49

2153

00

00

43

2169

00

06

61

2152

00

00

90

2170

00

05

89

2171

00

04

84

2172

00

02

79

2151

00

01

19

2150

00

01

37

2173

00

03

04

2149

00

01

43

2174

00

02

59

2148

00

04

63

2175

00

02

34

2146 (ROAD)

00

01

70

2143

00

08

02

2142

00

10

03

2125

00

18

00

2124

00

09

09

2123

00

00

20

2117

00

00

20

2116

00

04

31

2115

00

04

79

2114

00

18

53

2030

00

00

20

2031

00

00

20

2032

00

00

20

2033

00

00

20

2113

00

00

20

2069

00

08

97

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4442

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2070

00

00

20

2068

00

00

20

2067

00

00

20

2066

00

00

20

748

00

10

05

781

00

00

20

774

00

02

95

775

00

00

20

773

00

07

76

769

00

01

72

772

00

00

20

771

00

00

20

770

00

00

20

767

00

02

31

763

00

07

58

765

00

12

56

764

00

00

20

659 (ROAD)

00

01

43

652

00

01

32

653

00

05

88

651

00

00

20

656

00

01

58

655

00

01

72

654

00

04

38

657

00

00

20

629

00

01

68

628

00

02

41

626

00

11

24

627

00

00

20

630

00

00

20

625

00

00

20

624

00

00

20

384

00

03

76

385

00

07

62

374

00

00

20

386 (ROAD)

00

00

20

397

00

03

97

398

00

04

90

399

00

02

67

402

00

02

37

403

00

02

42

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4443

408

00

02

46

409

00

00

20

410

00

02

58

413

00

03

43

415

00

02

13

420

00

00

20

421

00

06

60

422

00

02

95

439

00

02

70

423

00

04

33

438

00

02

93

437

00

00

76

428

00

00

20

436

00

09

02

434

00

09

67

435

00

00

20

432

00

05

60

433

00

11

08

462

00

00

20

464

00

03

88

483

00

00

20

484

00

05

86

485

00

03

78

486

00

00

20

463

00

00

31

492

00

01

27

488

00

03

10

491

00

02

20

494

00

00

20

490

00

02

49

489

00

01

71

495

00

02

02

477

00

01

37

476

00

00

42

475

00

00

20

496

00

05

54

497

00

00

85

500 (ROAD)

00

01

53

46

00

08

43

63

00

00

20

64

00

12

45

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4444

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

45

00

09

85

43

00

00

20

42

00

00

20

44

00

02

44

MUIAN

2913

00

05

31

Thana No. 137

2924

00

00

20

2912

00

02

94

2914

00

02

65

2915

00

06

03

2916

00

03

45

2917

00

06

75

2918

00

04

61

2919

00

03

83

2920

00

07

44

2909

00

00

20

2857

00

09

33

2904

00

09

06

2903

00

00

97

2901

00

00

20

2902

00

02

74

2863

00

00

20

2864

00

00

20

2869

00

07

36

2868

00

07

17

2867

00

11

58

2871

00

00

20

2653

00

01

02

2652

00

16

11

2676

00

00

20

2677

00

00

20

2678

00

03

12

2679

00

05

24

2680

00

04

26

2651

00

00

20

2650

00

01

27

2681

00

10

72

2698

00

00

20

2697

00

00

20

2682

00

01

48

2683

00

00

50

2684

00

11

06

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4445

2686

00

05

42

2687

00

00

20

2691

00

00

20

2688

00

03

92

2638

00

00

20

2637

00

10

60

2689

00

00

20

2690

00

00

20

2634

00

00

20

2632

00

00

20

2636

00

02

86

2635

00

05

37

2628

00

02

84

2629

00

06

61

2630

00

00

88

2627

00

01

24

2624

00

14

18

2625

00

22

89

1499

00

02

96

1500

00

00

60

1509

00

05

82

1498

00

00

20

1510

00

00

20

1511

00

00

20

1508

00

10

19

1507

00

00

20

1505

00

00

20

2021-Nala

00

01

81

1512

00

00

20

2023

00

14

25

2022

00

02

83

2024

00

01

47

2020

00

04

14

2018

00

16

31

2019

00

00

20

2017

00

00

41

2011

00

08

67

2012

00

00

20

2006

00

06

15

2007 (NALA)

00

01

62

1863

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4446

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1881

00

00

20

1882

00

04

46

1883

00

06

59

1885

00

00

54

1884

00

03

72

1886

00

00

46

1887

00

00

20

1880

00

09

96

1878

00

06

97

1877

00

00

20

1879

00

00

20

1872

00

10

55

1873

00

06

05

1828

00

07

69

1827

00

00

20

1829

00

02

61

1830

00

02

60

1750-Cart Track

00

00

20

1826

00

03

66

1825

00

01

14

1823

00

00

20

1822

00

00

20

1821

00

00

20

1820

00

00

20

1824

00

04

38

1751

00

12

05

1755

00

13

79

1760

00

01

35

1759

00

09

60

1756

00

00

20

1762

00

00

20

1758

00

06

80

1763

00

08

72

1757 (CART TRACK)

00

00

20

75

00

00

20

74

00

00

20

72

00

00

20

1766

00

06

28

73

00

04

28

1767

00

02

68

1768

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4447

1770

00

09

85

1771

00

08

33

22

00

00

42

18

00

01

33

1772

00

09

72

19

00

00

20

17

00

06

95

1773

00

02

89

1774

00

00

20

16

00

05

48

15

00

04

31

10

00

12

83

11

00

08

11

13

00

01

92

14

00

00

20

12

00

00

97

8

00

11

10

7

00

05

48

2

00

04

90

1

00

00

20

TITRA

1848

00

04

66

Thana No. 75

1846

00

00

20

1849

00

00

20

1845

00

05

61

1844

00

07

30

1843

00

00

20

1842

00

10

54

1838

00

00

20

1841

00

01

72

1840

00

00

25

BIJAIPUR

793

00

13

92

Thana No. 136

792

00

05

89

791

00

02

36

790

00

00

20

788

00

01

65

798

00

00

79

785

00

08

07

784

00

16

14

783

00

09

33

807

00

00

20

829

00

06

98

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4448

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

781

00

00

20

780

00

16

85

777

00

10

56

776

00

08

16

772

00

03

31

771

00

05

19

770

00

05

03

769

00

00

20

768

00

03

30

767

00

00

20

766

00

10

09

765

00

05

67

849

00

04

48

764

00

00

20

751

00

04

64

752

00

00

20

750

00

12

19

749

00

01

23

748

00

00

20

747

00

01

38

741

00

19

40

754

00

00

20

740

00

03

72

738

00

07

46

737

00

00

57

736

00

06

69

735

00

01

82

734

00

00

20

POKHRERA

1147

00

00

66

Thana No. 76

1148

00

00

20

1135

00

04

06

1190

00

06

07

1191

00

02

80

1134

00

07

79

1126

00

09

28

1111

00

01

02

1110

00

01

60

1104

00

00

20

1101

00

00

20

1112

00

03

90

1113

00

06

39

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4449

1114

00

06

15

1115

00

00

20

1100

00

01

61

1099

00

06

27

1098

00

00

20

1096

00

06

41

1094(ROAD)

00

02

19

1082

00

01

49

1083

00

09

65

1084

00

02

35

1075

00

13

33

1074

00

00

20

1064/1186

00

00

20

1065

00

06

75

1066

00

01

25

1064

00

00

45

1059

00

12

39

1058

00

00

91

1057

00

05

18

1055

00

07

06

1054

00

00

20

1049

00

00

20

1053

00

05

79

1052

00

06

26

1042

00

16

12

1040

00

10

23

1039

00

06

58

1037

00

02

11

1038

00

00

91

1032

00

02

73

1033

00

00

20

1031

00

06

85

1030

00

00

20

1021

00

05

06

1029

00

12

01

1022

00

09

86

1028

00

00

20

1017

00

16

59

1013

00

02

43

1014

00

09

57

1015

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4450

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1016

00

00

20

KULDIPA

409

00

02

40

Thana No. 77

410

00

08

98

411

00

00

78

412

00

02

75

406

00

00

20

413

00

04

15

405

00

01

79

414

00

00

38

392

00

06

76

393

00

00

20

376

00

00

44

377

00

02

10

391

00

01

56

383

00

05

45

382

00

03

80

381

00

04

27

380

00

02

93

379

00

02

71

378

00

02

00

293

00

14

39

292

00

00

20

360

00

00

20

359

00

01

41

296

00

07

27

295

00

00

20

299

00

06

84

300

00

03

87

304

00

09

05

306

00

06

75

305

00

00

20

307

00

06

64

LACHHMIPUR

1287

00

01

49

Thana No. 78

1288

00

16

26

1289

00

00

20

1290

00

01

71

1292

00

00

89

1293

00

01

14

1294

00

00

32

1296

00

00

20

1291

00

11

19

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4451

1372

00

00

20

1342

00

13

47

1341

00

00

20

1340

00

00

20

1339

00

00

20

1346

00

14

99

1338

00

14

43

1348

00

00

20

1337

00

01

94

1336

00

04

81

1276 (RAILWAY)

00

06

33

1262/1408 (RAILWAY)

00

01

25

1172/1407 (RAILWAY)

00

01

03

1171/1409 (RAILWAY)

00

04

37

1171 (ROAD)

00

04

29

1107

00

05

89

1167

00

00

47

1168

00

00

20

1108

00

01

47

1109

00

01

64

1110

00

01

66

1111

00

01

87

1115

00

00

20

1113

00

00

59

1112

00

01

02

1166

00

03

94

1165

00

04

21

1164

00

04

19

191

00

03

85

192

00

03

93

193

00

00

94

194

00

04

91

195

00

00

77

196

00

14

27

205

00

00

20

198

00

01

88

200

00

04

93

199

00

04

51

158

00

00

91

157

00

08

37

154

00

04

18

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4452

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

156

00

00

20

155

00

03

15

153

00

00

20

151

00

12

25

150

00

00

20

70

00

12

66

69

00

00

46

71

00

02

09

68

00

08

85

67

00

00

20

66

00

03

99

72

00

02

51

78 (Road)

00

02

22

65 (ROAD)

00

00

20

81

00

02

55

82

00

00

20

80

00

06

78

97 (CART TRACK)

00

02

33

98/1402

00

01

83

108

00

07

62

109

00

00

20

101

00

01

09

102

00

01

11

103

00

00

76

104

00

00

20

107

00

09

75

106

00

12

74

BELASPUR

220

00

03

13

Thana No. 79

221

00

02

88

219

00

00

20

225

00

04

31

226

00

02

64

227

00

00

20

218

00

07

57

217

00

00

20

247

00

00

20

248

00

00

20

241

00

00

53

240

00

00

20

246

00

04

93

245

00

04

87

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4453

250

00

00

20

251

00

00

20

253

00

00

29

254

00

00

26

252

00

00

20

244

00

03

16

255

00

02

64

256

00

00

20

257

00

00

20

243

00

01

89

242

00

00

20

259

00

04

46

258

00

00

46

260

00

00

93

261

00

04

78

262

00

02

65

267

00

00

27

268

00

00

20

269

00

00

20

266

00

01

60

272

00

00

20

273

00

00

20

265

00

02

27

264

00

03

45

263

00

00

99

164

00

00

20

275

00

02

39

274

00

00

20

276

00

00

20

163

00

07

68

166

00

04

69

162

00

03

71

161/462

00

00

20

157/461

00

00

20

161

00

03

93

157

00

07

53

156

00

08

82

149

00

00

50

148

00

00

20

155

00

00

20

144

00

02

07

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4454

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

154

00

08

39

194(RAILWAY)

00

06

00

SEWTAPUR

2393-Road

00

01

22

Thana No-44

2390

00

03

79

2392

00

02

91

2304

00

13

09

2391

00

01

24

2303

00

01

49

2302

00

13

33

2301

00

02

03

2394 Road

00

02

57

2289

00

00

20

2290

00

04

40

2291Cart Track

00

00

20

2267

00

15

74

2266

00

07

72

2268

00

00

20

2264

00

00

98

2265

00

01

39

2263

00

02

44

2262

00

07

41

2261

00

03

98

2260

00

00

79

2217-Road

00

04

60

2215

00

00

20

2214

00

01

98

2213

00

03

75

2212

00

01

27

2211

00

04

41

2177

00

00

20

2210

00

04

44

2187

00

03

86

2186

00

04

00

2185

00

05

16

2184

00

07

12

2183

00

00

20

2182

00

00

20

2179

00

01

75

2178

00

01

17

2180

00

01

98

2181

00

02

39

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4455

2103-Road

00

01

46

2103/4746

00

09

16

2068

00

00

37

2072

00

00

67

2071

00

04

66

2073

00

00

20

2074

00

06

24

2075

00

00

20

2079

00

02

15

2078

00

01

95

2080

00

00

20

2081

00

03

31

2083

00

03

77

2089

00

00

20

2088

00

09

14

2087

00

03

63

2091

00

00

63

2086

00

00

20

2092

00

12

25

2093

00

00

20

1982

00

16

72

1981

00

03

89

1769-Road

00

01

72

539

00

04

56

547

00

03

96

540

00

00

36

548

00

00

36

546

00

06

18

545

00

02

65

549

00

05

02

550

00

01

72

551

00

03

37

552

00

06

26

556

00

04

81

553

00

00

31

553/4707

00

02

68

555

00

06

73

554

00

01

40

566

00

03

22

567

00

00

84

565

00

11

51

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4456

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

568

00

01

27

564

00

00

30

562

00

01

14

570

00

08

14

571

00

00

20

563

00

00

20

575

00

07

34

574

00

00

59

576

00

02

86

579

00

03

62

580

00

03

73

578

00

00

79

614

00

00

20

647

00

03

64

646

00

02

79

645

00

02

91

643

00

01

32

644

00

08

06

725

00

00

20

642

00

01

87

641

00

01

83

640

00

00

20

726

00

06

01

723

00

00

62

727

00

09

71

728

00

01

61

735

00

00

74

734

00

06

47

733

00

05

32

745

00

00

20

746

00

01

24

751

00

05

53

750

00

10

30

752

00

00

20

761

00

16

46

762

00

00

20

763

00

00

20

764-Road

00

03

30

772

00

03

74

773

00

00

20

771

00

02

03

774

00

04

46

770

00

00

20

769

00

00

20

775

00

05

79

776

00

00

35

777

00

01

00

284

00

00

20

278

00

11

55

279

00

00

82

277

00

04

45

276

00

04

41

280

00

00

20

275

00

03

06

268

00

06

23

266

00

05

32

265

00

02

08

264

00

02

71

263

00

08

93

154

00

01

24

262

00

05

56

165

00

02

25

248

00

00

20

166

00

05

28

167

00

00

20

247

00

02

41

168

00

07

35

169

00

05

64

170/4702

00

00

20

242

00

00

99

241

00

07

77

240

00

01

82

239

00

08

40

237

00

12

38

236

00

00

20

233

00

02

26

234

00

27

92

231

00

06

84

186 Cart Track

00

03

15

188

00

04

46

353 River

00

06

57

[F. No. R-25011/15/2013-OR-I]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4457

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

ubZ fnYyh] 5 vxLr] 2013

dk-vk- 1628-&&dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slk izrhr gksrk gS fd yksd fgr esa ;g vko”;d gS fd iVuk ls eksfrgkjh vkSj

csrkyiqj rd isVªksfy;e inkFkks± ds ifjogu gsrq ftyk iVuk] jkT; fcgkj esa bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs”ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbiykbu

fcNkbZ tkuh pkfg, A

vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slh ikbiykbu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, vko”;d izrhr gksrk gS fd ml Hkwfe esa ftlds

Hkhrj mDr ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkus dk izLrko gS vkSj tks bl vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa of.kZr gS] mi;ksx dk vtZu fd;k

tk,(

vr%] vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] iSVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbUl ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½ vf/kfu;e] 1962

¼1962 dk 50½ dh /kkjk 3 dh mi/kkjk¼1½ }kjk iznÙk “kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] mDr Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/akdkj dk vtZu

djus ds vius vk”k; dh ?kks’k.kk djrh gSA

dksbZ O;fDr] tks mDr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa fgrc) gS] ml rkjh[k ls ftldks] Hkkjr ds jkti= esa ;Fkk izdkf”kr

bl vf/klwpuk dh izfr;ka lk/kkj.k turk dks miyC/k djk nh tkrh gS] bDdhl fnu ds vUnj] Hkwfe ds Hkhrj ikbiykbu fcNk,

tkus gsrq mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj ds vtZu ds fy,] Jh v:.k dqekj >k] fc-iz-ls- o l{ke izkf/kdkjh bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs”ku

fyfeVsM] ¼ikbiykbu fMohtu½ iVuk] iks-vks- <syok] flikjk] ftyk iVuk] fiu %&800020] fcgkj dks fyf[kr :i eas vk{ksi Hkst

ldsxkA

vuqlwph

rglhy % iVuk

jkT; % fcgkj

ekStk@xzke

losZ@Cykd@la- (IyksV la-)

lc&Mho&la-

{ks=kiQy

gsDVs;j

vkjs

oxZ ehVj

1

2

3

4

5

6

bczkgheiqj

230

00

05

22

Fkkuk uacj&61

229

00

11

63

228

00

05

92

227

00

00

20

220

00

01

10

223

00

03

83

224

00

02

27

225

00

02

57

226

00

05

23

60

00

06

04

61

00

00

38

54

00

04

30

53

00

03

98

52

00

03

20

51

00

07

84

50

00

02

53

49

00

01

08

64

00

01

42

4458

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4459

66

00

09

40

21

00

00

20

67

00

00

20

8

00

07

57

5

00

03

56

7

00

06

30

6

00

01

57

9

00

00

65

2

00

05

99

10

00

00

20

vYgkuiqjk

2451

00

00

74

Fkkuk uacj&60

2450

00

04

26

2440

00

12

01

2449

00

00

20

2439

00

06

42

2437

00

01

08

2438

00

06

86

2441 ¼ukyk½

00

01

92

2422 ¼ukyk½

00

06

19

1393

00

00

50

1396

00

03

13

1397

00

05

74

1398

00

05

81

2358

00

06

04

2359

00

00

20

2357

00

03

74

2361

00

00

37

2343

00

04

04

2341

00

00

20

2342

00

04

45

2362

00

00

20

2363

00

00

20

2364

00

05

42

2365

00

01

32

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4460

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2340

00

04

84

2367

00

00

47

2368

00

00

30

2336

00

05

71

2335

00

03

47

2334

00

06

38

2333

00

00

20

2318

00

11

14

2314

00

03

37

2315

00

05

36

1868 ¼jkLrk½

00

01

24

2209

00

00

20

2204

00

09

98

2203

00

14

12

2202 ¼jkLrk½

00

01

85

2167

00

00

20

2168

00

04

76

2169

00

03

08

2170

00

05

46

2171

00

02

10

2173

00

09

89

2199

00

00

20

2197

00

03

82

2196

00

09

16

2195

00

01

72

2194

00

01

80

ek/kksiqj

465

00

00

20

Fkkuk uacj&64

464

00

06

60

463

00

00

20

cthniqj

¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

00

96

Fkkuk uacj&65

1349 ¼jsyos½

00

00

20

1347 ¼jsyos½

00

00

20

1348 ¼jsyos½

00

04

14

1346 ¼jsyos½

00

05

83

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4461

1345 ¼jsyos½

00

03

83

1259 ¼jsyos½

00

04

94

1253

00

02

47

1254

00

00

20

1252

00

08

22

1251

00

00

20

chlquiqjk

3224

00

09

96

Fkkuk uacj&66

3225

00

08

81

3227

00

00

20

3226

00

05

69

3222

00

00

20

3221

00

05

51

3220

00

05

81

3219

00

06

66

3217

00

00

37

3181

00

06

29

3182

00

00

20

3180

00

02

92

2895

00

00

78

2894

00

00

20

2893

00

02

86

2892

00

03

58

2889

00

00

20

2900

00

06

97

2899

00

05

03

2898

00

00

20

2890

00

02

11

2901 ¼jkLrk½

00

02

69

3249 ¼jkLrk½

00

01

15

2547

00

68

46

2546

00

00

72

2545

00

01

45

2538

00

04

88

2539

00

03

64

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4462

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2540

00

03

70

2536

00

00

20

2511

00

00

20

2541

00

01

12

2542

00

00

25

2452

00

00

20

2453

00

00

20

2451

00

06

67

2450

00

05

74

2449

00

01

62

2465

00

00

20

2446

00

01

78

2447

00

02

30

2448

00

03

97

2363

00

04

51

2362

00

00

20

2364

00

02

24

2365

00

00

20

2418

00

01

85

2419

00

01

72

2420

00

00

20

2422

00

00

20

2423

00

01

37

2424

00

03

47

1565 ¼jkLrk½

00

01

18

1117

00

00

20

1116

00

03

31

1115

00

00

34

1135

00

04

45

1134

00

00

20

1140

00

01

43

1139

00

02

66

1138

00

00

20

1141

00

03

17

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4463

1158

00

03

46

1161

00

03

42

1169

00

01

72

1171

00

00

83

1170

00

00

56

1191

00

02

50

1190

00

00

70

1192

00

00

32

1189

00

04

46

1203

00

00

20

1204

00

01

37

1205

00

05

60

1206

00

01

43

1220

00

01

16

1277

00

03

29

1282

00

01

46

1283

00

02

66

1295

00

02

51

1296

00

04

04

1302

00

01

46

1303

00

01

80

1308

00

03

10

1309

00

00

98

1310

00

01

18

1273

00

07

06

1311

00

01

67

1312

00

00

20

1317

00

00

20

1324

00

00

20

1323

00

00

20

1325

00

00

77

1326

00

00

40

1327

00

00

71

1342

00

01

10

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4464

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1341

00

01

31

1340

00

01

24

1328

00

08

39

1339

00

01

22

1336

00

01

24

1335

00

00

79

1331

00

01

63

1329

00

05

77

1330

00

03

01

681

00

07

34

683

00

01

68

680

00

02

95

682

00

14

02

522 ¼jkLrk vsl-vsp-&78½

00

04

38

362

00

00

36

368

00

02

42

404

00

00

20

369

00

02

35

371

00

00

82

370

00

01

44

374

00

02

06

375

00

02

30

376

00

00

73

377

00

00

94

378

00

02

21

379

00

02

44

380

00

02

50

381

00

02

00

382

00

01

68

384

00

01

82

394

00

00

20

395

00

05

96

397

00

03

31

398

00

01

33

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4465

399

00

02

23

396

00

05

22

ij[kksrheiqj iSukBh

1083

00

03

14

Fkkuk uacj&68

1082

00

02

00

1081

00

04

10

1084

00

10

40

1080

00

09

68

1135

00

01

15

1134

00

06

74

1140

00

00

20

1141

00

07

45

1142

00

00

20

1146

00

04

36

1148

00

02

44

1147

00

09

65

1172

00

01

45

1171 ¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

01

48

1145

00

00

20

1208

00

02

76

1209

00

11

15

1210

00

00

20

1211

00

00

20

1201

00

00

20

1202

00

00

20

1203

00

00

20

1205

00

04

72

1204

00

03

49

1196

00

03

12

1197

00

00

25

1195

00

02

35

1194

00

00

20

1193

00

07

67

1191

00

02

63

1187¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

00

95

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4466

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

961

00

00

20

962

00

09

42

963

00

02

75

960

00

00

20

959

00

00

20

964

00

02

27

965

00

04

02

957

00

00

20

958

00

00

20

956

00

00

29

941

00

06

23

955

00

00

65

954

00

01

09

944

00

02

36

945

00

02

58

953

00

01

44

952

00

02

66

951

00

01

90

950

00

03

31

1256

00

00

50

927

00

04

98

929

00

00

20

928

00

02

94

926

00

00

48

925

00

00

20

923

00

05

29

922

00

00

91

907 ¼ukyk½

00

02

08

906 ¼ukyk½

00

01

24

905 ¼ukyk½

00

01

18

619 ¼ukyk½

00

01

12

614

00

02

42

615

00

02

89

616

00

07

68

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4467

617

00

00

86

618

00

00

20

610

00

00

42

622

00

04

82

624

00

01

34

623

00

01

96

625

00

01

93

626

00

01

80

627

00

02

66

628

00

06

37

629

00

02

23

630

00

00

20

619 ¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

01

22

619 ¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

01

96

680

00

00

20

679

00

00

90

678

00

06

65

906 ¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

01

24

645

00

00

20

661

00

01

94

671

00

03

89

673

00

00

20

670

00

00

20

672

00

05

83

667

00

07

03

666

00

00

20

125 ¼jkLrk½

00

03

24

107

00

00

20

109

00

03

79

110

00

09

32

112

00

04

66

113

00

00

94

111

00

02

53

115

00

09

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4468

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

118

00

00

62

117

00

08

38

116

00

09

68

10

00

00

25

11

00

01

26

18

00

03

13

19

00

00

20

17

00

01

76

12

00

02

84

16

00

00

90

15

00

00

20

14

00

00

20

13

00

07

50

31 ¼ukyk½

00

01

04

32

00

01

12

44

00

00

25

47

00

04

25

48

00

04

86

49

00

04

68

46

00

01

14

50

00

07

42

9 ¼dPpk jkLrk½

00

04

27

51 ¼jkLrk½

00

01

15

52 ¼jkLrk½

00

01

32

53 ¼jkLrk½

00

01

20

1 ¼jkLrk½

00

00

20

2

00

00

20

dqryqiqj

2719 ¼jkLrk½

00

00

82

Fkkuk uacj&56

1196

00

00

20

1197

00

17

47

2726

00

05

20

1193

00

01

69

1200 ¼jkLrk½

00

01

39

1225

00

01

33

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4469

1226

00

19

37

2725

00

00

20

1240

00

08

30

1239

00

11

53

1242

00

03

34

1243

00

03

12

1078

00

00

20

1082

00

05

40

1081

00

10

73

1080

00

05

65

1065

00

00

20

1064

00

05

66

1063

00

03

65

927

00

02

76

928

00

09

13

929

00

07

52

931

00

05

40

918

00

00

20

917

00

05

29

916

00

05

92

915

00

00

20

705

00

00

40

706

00

08

72

707

00

01

45

708

00

00

20

711

00

00

20

907

00

00

90

906

00

01

94

905

00

03

32

902

00

01

30

904

00

01

10

903

00

04

96

898

00

00

20

897

00

00

32

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4470

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

896

00

03

07

895

00

05

15

894

00

00

20

761

00

02

39

760

00

00

20

762

00

03

00

765

00

01

74

763

00

00

82

764

00

02

58

766

00

06

04

767

00

03

67

768

00

00

20

750

00

00

20

749

00

01

66

771

00

11

77

772

00

00

76

776

00

00

20

747

00

02

89

745

00

10

27

746

00

00

64

744

00

00

20

743

00

04

36

742

00

02

06

741

00

00

20

788

00

08

69

789

00

00

20

552

00

00

97

553

00

04

43

554

00

03

16

555

00

04

16

531

00

01

44

530

00

00

25

511@2716

00

07

65

529

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4471

528

00

01

33

511

00

09

80

513

00

00

20

512

00

03

06

509

00

00

20

508

00

08

94

507

00

05

56

515

00

00

20

eqUlsiqj

938

00

00

65

Fkkuk uacj&19

939

00

00

20

936

00

07

18

935

00

03

55

934

00

01

49

933

00

00

22

922¼ukyk½

00

00

91

952

00

00

78

953

00

03

50

954

00

00

20

955

00

06

48

956

00

03

34

957

00

09

30

965

00

00

20

966

00

04

72

967

00

00

20

964

00

02

29

963

00

00

25

968

00

02

68

969

00

02

70

970

00

03

49

971

00

03

53

972

00

00

20

973

00

03

89

974

00

00

20

851

00

02

69

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4472

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

850

00

07

70

849

00

00

20

848

00

00

31

849

00

00

20

847

00

05

34

846

00

02

53

844

00

00

20

749

00

01

69

800

00

03

70

801

00

04

32

799

00

00

20

798

00

02

58

802

00

00

55

803

00

00

20

776

00

01

60

797

00

03

61

795

00

01

51

796

00

00

20

777

00

10

07

793

00

01

52

792

00

01

68

791

00

05

52

790

00

00

90

789

00

00

20

788

00

08

51

787

00

06

71

786

00

00

20

532

00

00

32

534

00

09

26

535

00

03

29

536

00

03

10

539

00

01

07

547

00

01

82

540

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4473

546

00

05

68

545

00

02

05

544

00

02

36

543

00

01

45

521

00

03

18

520

00

03

40

519

00

00

98

518

00

00

20

552¼ukyk½

00

01

36

557

00

00

20

559

00

02

94

560

00

04

76

561

00

05

87

562

00

04

38

563

00

03

64

564

00

01

31

572

00

01

34

569

00

08

24

568

00

06

36

202

00

01

12

201

00

11

71

1165

00

05

53

1164

00

03

84

8

00

07

03

7

00

06

41

ujSuiqj

408 ¼jkLrk½

00

02

44

Fkkuk uacj&20

292

00

04

99

291

00

11

43

290

00

16

71

289

00

04

40

301

00

00

91

302

00

10

58

284

00

00

20

283

00

01

17

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4474

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

282

00

03

29

281

00

01

99

280

00

02

33

279

00

00

20

303

00

00

90

176

00

19

64

177

00

02

52

178

00

00

20

175

00

01

78

174

00

00

20

179

00

26

31

187

00

01

59

184

00

08

49

185

00

08

16

75

00

02

27

183

00

01

37

76

00

12

94

98

00

13

16

97

00

08

78

96

00

01

99

95

00

00

20

102

00

12

05

103

00

02

78

16

00

00

20

20

00

13

70

21

00

05

33

22

00

00

20

25

00

00

20

19

00

05

36

18

00

02

32

17

00

00

20

26

00

11

12

4

00

07

98

34

00

01

33

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4475

vkuUniqj

2657

00

09

71

Fkkuk uacj&36

2656

00

07

61

2655

00

00

20

372

00

15

28

374 ¼jkLrk½

00

03

52

366

00

03

00

367

00

05

86

359@3598

00

04

70

359

00

07

63

356

00

07

10

202

00

03

32

203

00

15

54

200

00

04

00

204

00

24

37

192

00

07

03

133

00

06

61

135

00

11

51

136

00

12

71

124

00

09

54

120

00

15

62

117

00

13

00

118

00

04

20

112

00

09

91

111

00

00

20

110

00

11

69

109

00

19

97

108

00

01

66

71

00

01

26

ek/kksiqj-

869

00

07

21

Fkkuk uacj&21

870

00

07

51

871

00

06

71

872

00

03

78

873

00

03

31

874

00

20

14

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4476

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

889

00

06

65

890

00

00

20

878

00

00

20

884

00

14

14

881

00

00

20

885

00

00

20

883

00

07

30

882

00

07

46

886

00

00

20

880

00

00

20

1098@1414 ¼ukyk½

00

03

50

636

00

04

66

637

00

03

43

638

00

02

05

639

00

00

20

640

00

08

41

641

00

00

20

632

00

04

98

653

00

00

61

654

00

01

64

631

00

13

40

666

00

08

05

665

00

05

46

664

00

00

20

667

00

01

91

670

00

03

97

671

00

00

20

668

00

00

20

669

00

01

94

672

00

00

92

606

00

00

20

605

00

02

53

604

00

07

27

603

00

05

65

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4477

602

00

05

94

585

00

00

71

601

00

00

34

591

00

02

95

592

00

02

28

593

00

00

55

590

00

05

72

562 ¼jkLrk½

00

01

81

540

00

11

46

561

00

00

20

560

00

12

01

559

00

09

20

715

00

05

26

169

00

05

40

170

00

03

37

173

00

02

14

172

00

08

54

179

00

00

25

180

00

00

20

178

00

00

47

63

00

05

75

64

00

00

36

62@1422

00

08

65

61

00

01

07

62

00

00

20

66

00

00

20

67

00

09

89

60

00

01

24

58

00

00

20

68

00

00

20

59

00

05

93

53

00

01

37

50

00

37

06

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4478

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ekusj

341

00

00

56

Fkkuk uacj&7

334

00

03

63

333

00

05

41

332

00

08

25

225

00

09

95

226

00

05

24

245

00

04

57

255

00

04

00

250

00

00

20

254

00

01

41

258

00

00

73

257

00

00

20

261

00

00

20

259

00

02

37

260

00

04

19

263

00

03

12

264

00

02

68

266

00

02

60

267

00

02

19

268

00

00

36

269

00

00

20

270

00

00

20

203

00

09

85

204

00

11

10

207

00

02

07

205

00

03

03

193

00

00

20

206

00

07

44

191

00

02

03

190

00

05

52

104

00

04

36

189

00

05

30

188

00

07

16

185

00

12

58

184

00

06

89

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4479

180

00

05

21

181

00

00

20

179

00

05

26

178

00

01

41

168

00

00

20

176

00

04

55

175

00

01

55

171

00

04

08

173

00

01

82

174

00

00

20

172

00

00

82

¹iQk- la- vkj-&25011@16@2013&vksvkj&Iº

iou oqQekj] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 5th August, 2013

S.O. 1628.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest

that a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited in Dist. Patna in the State of Bihar for

‘Patna to Motihari and Baitalpur Pipeline’ for the transportation of Petroleum Product;

And, whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is

necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which

is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and

Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby

declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from

the date on which the copies of the notification issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as

published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition

of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land, to Shri Arun Kumar Jha B.A.S. &

Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited. (Pipelines Division) P.O. Dhelwan, Sipara, Dist. Patna

(Bihar.) Pin–800020.

SCHEDULE

Dist.: Patna

State : Bihar

Mouja / Village

Survey/BlockNo.

Sub-Div-No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

IBRAHIMPUR

230

00

05

22

Thana

229

00

11

63

Number :-61

228

00

05

92

227

00

00

20

220

00

01

10

223

00

03

83

224

00

02

27

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4480

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

225

00

02

57

226

00

05

23

60

00

06

04

61

00

00

38

54

00

04

30

53

00

03

98

52

00

03

20

51

00

07

84

50

00

02

53

49

00

01

08

64

00

01

42

66

00

09

40

21

00

00

20

67

00

00

20

8

00

07

57

5

00

03

56

7

00

06

30

6

00

01

57

9

00

00

65

2

00

05

99

10

00

00

20

ALHANPURA

2451

00

00

74

Thana

2450

00

04

26

Number:-60

2440

00

12

01

2449

00

00

20

2439

00

06

42

2437

00

01

08

2438

00

06

86

2441 (NALA)

00

01

92

2422 (NALA)

00

06

19

1393

00

00

50

1396

00

03

13

1397

00

05

74

1398

00

05

81

2358

00

06

04

2359

00

00

20

2357

00

03

74

2361

00

00

37

2343

00

04

04

2341

00

00

20

2342

00

04

45

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4481

2362

00

00

20

2363

00

00

20

2364

00

05

42

2365

00

01

32

2340

00

04

84

2367

00

00

47

2368

00

00

30

2336

00

05

71

2335

00

03

47

2334

00

06

38

2333

00

00

20

2318

00

11

14

2314

00

03

37

2315

00

05

36

1868 (ROAD)

00

01

24

2209

00

00

20

2204

00

09

98

2203

00

14

12

2202 (ROAD)

00

01

85

2167

00

00

20

2168

00

04

76

2169

00

03

08

2170

00

05

46

2171

00

02

10

2173

00

09

89

2199

00

00

20

2197

00

03

82

2196

00

09

16

2195

00

01

72

2194

00

01

80

MADHOPUR

465

00

00

20

Thana Number :- 64

464

00

06

60

463

00

00

20

BAZIDPUR

(CART TRACK)

00

00

96

Thana

1349 (RAILWAY)

00

00

20

Number :-65

1347 (RAILWAY)

00

00

20

1348 (RAILWAY)

00

04

14

1346 (RAILWAY)

00

05

83

1345 (RAILWAY)

00

03

83

1259 (RAILWAY)

00

04

94

1253

00

02

47

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4482

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1254

00

00

20

1252

00

08

22

1251

00

00

20

BISHUNPURA

3224

00

09

96

Thana

3225

00

08

81

Number :- 66

3227

00

00

20

3226

00

05

69

3222

00

00

20

3221

00

05

51

3220

00

05

81

3219

00

06

66

3217

00

00

37

3181

00

06

29

3182

00

00

20

3180

00

02

92

2895

00

00

78

2894

00

00

20

2893

00

02

86

2892

00

03

58

2889

00

00

20

2900

00

06

97

2899

00

05

03

2898

00

00

20

2890

00

02

11

2901 (ROAD)

00

02

69

3249 (ROAD)

00

01

15

2547

00

68

46

2546

00

00

72

2545

00

01

45

2538

00

04

88

2539

00

03

64

2540

00

03

70

2536

00

00

20

2511

00

00

20

2541

00

01

12

2542

00

00

25

2452

00

00

20

2453

00

00

20

2451

00

06

67

2450

00

05

74

2449

00

01

62

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4483

2465

00

00

20

2446

00

01

78

2447

00

02

30

2448

00

03

97

2363

00

04

51

2362

00

00

20

2364

00

02

24

2365

00

00

20

2418

00

01

85

2419

00

01

72

2420

00

00

20

2422

00

00

20

2423

00

01

37

2424

00

03

47

1565 (ROAD)

00

01

18

1117

00

00

20

1116

00

03

31

1115

00

00

34

1135

00

04

45

1134

00

00

20

1140

00

01

43

1139

00

02

66

1138

00

00

20

1141

00

03

17

1158

00

03

46

1161

00

03

42

1169

00

01

72

1171

00

00

83

1170

00

00

56

1191

00

02

50

1190

00

00

70

1192

00

00

32

1189

00

04

46

1203

00

00

20

1204

00

01

37

1205

00

05

60

1206

00

01

43

1220

00

01

16

1277

00

03

29

1282

00

01

46

1283

00

02

66

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4484

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1295

00

02

51

1296

00

04

04

1302

00

01

46

1303

00

01

80

1308

00

03

10

1309

00

00

98

1310

00

01

18

1273

00

07

06

1311

00

01

67

1312

00

00

20

1317

00

00

20

1324

00

00

20

1323

00

00

20

1325

00

00

77

1326

00

00

40

1327

00

00

71

1342

00

01

10

1341

00

01

31

1340

00

01

24

1328

00

08

39

1339

00

01

22

1336

00

01

24

1335

00

00

79

1331

00

01

63

1329

00

05

77

1330

00

03

01

681

00

07

34

683

00

01

68

680

00

02

95

682

00

14

02

522(ROAD SH-78)

00

04

38

362

00

00

36

368

00

02

42

404

00

00

20

369

00

02

35

371

00

00

82

370

00

01

44

374

00

02

06

375

00

02

30

376

00

00

73

377

00

00

94

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4485

378

00

02

21

379

00

02

44

380

00

02

50

381

00

02

00

382

00

01

68

384

00

01

82

394

00

00

20

395

00

05

96

397

00

03

31

398

00

01

33

399

00

02

23

396

00

05

22

Parkhotimpur Painathi

1083

00

03

14

Thana number :- 68

1082

00

02

00

1081

00

04

10

1084

00

10

40

1080

00

09

68

1135

00

01

15

1134

00

06

74

1140

00

00

20

1141

00

07

45

1142

00

00

20

1146

00

04

36

1148

00

02

44

1147

00

09

65

1172

00

01

45

1171 (CART TRACK)

00

01

48

1145

00

00

20

1208

00

02

76

1209

00

11

15

1210

00

00

20

1211

00

00

20

1201

00

00

20

1202

00

00

20

1203

00

00

20

1205

00

04

72

1204

00

03

49

1196

00

03

12

1197

00

00

25

1195

00

02

35

1194

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4486

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1193

00

07

67

1191

00

02

63

1187 (CART TRACK)

00

00

95

961

00

00

20

962

00

09

42

963

00

02

75

960

00

00

20

959

00

00

20

964

00

02

27

965

00

04

02

957

00

00

20

958

00

00

20

956

00

00

29

941

00

06

23

955

00

00

65

954

00

01

09

944

00

02

36

945

00

02

58

953

00

01

44

952

00

02

66

951

00

01

90

950

00

03

31

1256

00

00

50

927

00

04

98

929

00

00

20

928

00

02

94

926

00

00

48

925

00

00

20

923

00

05

29

922

00

00

91

907(NALA)

00

02

08

906 (NALA)

00

01

24

905 (NALA)

00

01

18

619 (NALA)

00

01

12

614

00

02

42

615

00

02

89

616

00

07

68

617

00

00

86

618

00

00

20

610

00

00

42

622

00

04

82

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4487

624

00

01

34

623

00

01

96

625

00

01

93

626

00

01

80

627

00

02

66

628

00

06

37

629

00

02

23

630

00

00

20

619 (CART TRACK)

00

01

22

619 (CART TRACK)

00

01

96

680

00

00

20

679

00

00

90

678

00

06

65

906 (Cart Track)

00

01

24

645

00

00

20

661

00

01

94

671

00

03

89

673

00

00

20

670

00

00

20

672

00

05

83

667

00

07

03

666

00

00

20

125 (ROAD)

00

03

24

107

00

00

20

109

00

03

79

110

00

09

32

112

00

04

66

113

00

00

94

111

00

02

53

115

00

09

20

118

00

00

62

117

00

08

38

116

00

09

68

10

00

00

25

11

00

01

26

18

00

03

13

19

00

00

20

17

00

01

76

12

00

02

84

16

00

00

90

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4488

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

15

00

00

20

14

00

00

20

13

00

07

50

31 (NALA)

00

01

04

32

00

01

12

44

00

00

25

47

00

04

25

48

00

04

86

49

00

04

68

46

00

01

14

50

00

07

42

9 (CART TRACK)

00

04

27

51 (ROAD)

00

01

15

52 (ROAD)

00

01

32

53 (ROAD)

00

01

20

1 (ROAD)

00

00

20

2

00

00

20

KUTALPUR Thana number :- 56

2719(Road)

00

00

82

1196

00

00

20

1197

00

17

47

2726

00

05

20

1193

00

01

69

1200 (Road)

00

01

39

1225

00

01

33

1226

00

19

37

2725

00

00

20

1240

00

08

30

1239

00

11

53

1242

00

03

34

1243

00

03

12

1078

00

00

20

1082

00

05

40

1081

00

10

73

1080

00

05

65

1065

00

00

20

1064

00

05

66

1063

00

03

65

927

00

02

76

928

00

09

13

929

00

07

52

931

00

05

40

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4489

918

00

00

20

917

00

05

29

916

00

05

92

915

00

00

20

705

00

00

40

706

00

08

72

707

00

01

45

708

00

00

20

711

00

00

20

907

00

00

90

906

00

01

94

905

00

03

32

902

00

01

30

904

00

01

10

903

00

04

96

898

00

00

20

897

00

00

32

896

00

03

07

895

00

05

15

894

00

00

20

761

00

02

39

760

00

00

20

762

00

03

00

765

00

01

74

763

00

00

82

764

00

02

58

766

00

06

04

767

00

03

67

768

00

00

20

750

00

00

20

749

00

01

66

771

00

11

77

772

00

00

76

776

00

00

20

747

00

02

89

745

00

10

27

746

00

00

64

744

00

00

20

743

00

04

36

742

00

02

06

741

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4490

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

788

00

08

69

789

00

00

20

552

00

00

97

553

00

04

43

554

00

03

16

555

00

04

16

531

00

01

44

530

00

00

25

511 / 2716

00

07

65

529

00

00

20

528

00

01

33

511

00

09

80

513

00

00

20

512

00

03

06

509

00

00

20

508

00

08

94

507

00

05

56

515

00

00

20

MUNSEPUR

938

00

00

65

Thana Number :- 19

939

00

00

20

936

00

07

18

935

00

03

55

934

00

01

49

933

00

00

22

922(Nala)

00

00

91

952

00

00

78

953

00

03

50

954

00

00

20

955

00

06

48

956

00

03

34

957

00

09

30

965

00

00

20

966

00

04

72

967

00

00

20

964

00

02

29

963

00

00

25

968

00

02

68

969

00

02

70

970

00

03

49

971

00

03

53

972

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4491

973

00

03

89

974

00

00

20

851

00

02

69

850

00

07

70

849

00

00

20

848

00

00

31

849

00

00

20

847

00

05

34

846

00

02

53

844

00

00

20

749

00

01

69

800

00

03

70

801

00

04

32

799

00

00

20

798

00

02

58

802

00

00

55

803

00

00

20

776

00

01

60

797

00

03

61

795

00

01

51

796

00

00

20

777

00

10

07

793

00

01

52

792

00

01

68

791

00

05

52

790

00

00

90

789

00

00

20

788

00

08

51

787

00

06

71

786

00

00

20

532

00

00

32

534

00

09

26

535

00

03

29

536

00

03

10

539

00

01

07

547

00

01

82

540

00

00

20

546

00

05

68

545

00

02

05

544

00

02

36

543

00

01

45

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4492

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

521

00

03

18

520

00

03

40

519

00

00

98

518

00

00

20

552(Nala)

00

01

36

557

00

00

20

559

00

02

94

560

00

04

76

561

00

05

87

562

00

04

38

563

00

03

64

564

00

01

31

572

00

01

34

569

00

08

24

568

00

06

36

202

00

01

12

201

00

11

71

1165

00

05

53

1164

00

03

84

8

00

07

03

7

00

06

41

NARAINPUR

408 (Road)

00

02

44

Thana Number :- 20

292

00

04

99

291

00

11

43

290

00

16

71

289

00

04

40

301

00

00

91

302

00

10

58

284

00

00

20

283

00

01

17

282

00

03

29

281

00

01

99

280

00

02

33

279

00

00

20

303

00

00

90

176

00

19

64

177

00

02

52

178

00

00

20

175

00

01

78

174

00

00

20

179

00

26

31

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4493

187

00

01

59

184

00

08

49

185

00

08

16

75

00

02

27

183

00

01

37

76

00

12

94

98

00

13

16

97

00

08

78

96

00

01

99

95

00

00

20

102

00

12

05

103

00

02

78

16

00

00

20

20

00

13

70

21

00

05

33

22

00

00

20

25

00

00

20

19

00

05

36

18

00

02

32

17

00

00

20

26

00

11

12

4

00

07

98

34

00

01

33

ANANDPUR

2657

00

09

71

Thana Number :- 36

2656

00

07

61

2655

00

00

20

372

00

15

28

374 (Road)

00

03

52

366

00

03

00

367

00

05

86

359/3598

00

04

70

359

00

07

63

356

00

07

10

202

00

03

32

203

00

15

54

200

00

04

00

204

00

24

37

192

00

07

03

133

00

06

61

135

00

11

51

136

00

12

71

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4494

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

124

00

09

54

120

00

15

62

117

00

13

00

118

00

04

20

112

00

09

91

111

00

00

20

110

00

11

69

109

00

19

97

108

00

01

66

71

00

01

26

MADHOPUR

869

00

07

21

Thana Number :- 21

870

00

07

51

871

00

06

71

872

00

03

78

873

00

03

31

874

00

20

14

889

00

06

65

890

00

00

20

878

00

00

20

884

00

14

14

881

00

00

20

885

00

00

20

883

00

07

30

882

00

07

46

886

00

00

20

880

00

00

20

1098 / 1414 (Nala)

00

03

50

636

00

04

66

637

00

03

43

638

00

02

05

639

00

00

20

640

00

08

41

641

00

00

20

632

00

04

98

653

00

00

61

654

00

01

64

631

00

13

40

666

00

08

05

665

00

05

46

664

00

00

20

667

00

01

91

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4495

670

00

03

97

671

00

00

20

668

00

00

20

669

00

01

94

672

00

00

92

606

00

00

20

605

00

02

53

604

00

07

27

603

00

05

65

602

00

05

94

585

00

00

71

601

00

00

34

591

00

02

95

592

00

02

28

593

00

00

55

590

00

05

72

562 (Road)

00

01

81

540

00

11

46

561

00

00

20

560

00

12

01

559

00

09

20

715

00

05

26

169

00

05

40

170

00

03

37

173

00

02

14

172

00

08

54

179

00

00

25

180

00

00

20

178

00

00

47

63

00

05

75

64

00

00

36

62 / 1422

00

08

65

61

00

01

07

62

00

00

20

66

00

00

20

67

00

09

89

60

00

01

24

58

00

00

20

68

00

00

20

59

00

05

93

53

00

01

37

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4496

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

50

00

37

06

MANER

341

00

00

56

Thana Number :-7

334

00

03

63

333

00

05

41

332

00

08

25

225

00

09

95

226

00

05

24

245

00

04

57

255

00

04

00

250

00

00

20

254

00

01

41

258

00

00

73

257

00

00

20

261

00

00

20

259

00

02

37

260

00

04

19

263

00

03

12

264

00

02

68

266

00

02

60

267

00

02

19

268

00

00

36

269

00

00

20

270

00

00

20

203

00

09

85

204

00

11

10

207

00

02

07

205

00

03

03

193

00

00

20

206

00

07

44

191

00

02

03

190

00

05

52

104

00

04

36

189

00

05

30

188

00

07

16

185

00

12

58

184

00

06

89

180

00

05

21

181

00

00

20

179

00

05

26

178

00

01

41

168

00

00

20

176

00

04

55

175

00

01

55

171

00

04

08

173

00

01

82

174

00

00

20

172

00

00

82

[F. No. R-25011/16/2013-OR-I]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

ubZ fnYyh] 5 vxLr] 2013

dk-vk- 1629-—dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slk izrhr gksrk gS fd yksd fgr esa ;g vko”;d gS fd iVuk ls eksfrgkjh vkSj csrkyiqj

rd isVªksfy;e inkFkksZ ds ifjogu gsrq ftyk iVuk] jkT; fcgkj esa bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs”ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkuh

pkfg, A

vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slh ikbiykbu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, vko”;d izrhr gksrk gS fd ml Hkwfe esa ftlds Hkhrj

mDr ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkus dk izLrko gS vkSj tks bl vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa of.kZr gS] mi;ksx dk vtZu fd;k tk,(

vr% vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbUl ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½ vf/kfu;e] 1962 ¼1962

dk 50½ dh /kkjk 3 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk iznÙk “kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] mDr Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/akdkj dk vtZu djus ds

vius vk”k; dh ?kks’k.kk djrh gSA

dksbZ O;fDr] tks mDr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa fgrc) gS] ml rkjh[k ls ftldks] Hkkjr ds jkti= esa ;Fkk

izdkf”kr bl vf/klwpuk dh izfr;ka lk/kkj.k turk dks miyC/k djk nh tkrh gS] bDdhl fnu ds vUnj] Hkwfe ds Hkhrj ikbiykbu

fcNk, tkus gsrq mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj ds vtZu ds fy,] Jh v:.k dqekj >k] fc-iz-ls- o l{ke izkf/kdkjh bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs”ku

fyfeVsM] ¼ikbiykbu fMohtu½ iVuk] iks-vks- <syok] flikjk] ftyk iVuk] fiu% 800020] fcgkj dks fyf[kr :i eas vk{ksi Hkst ldsxkA

vuqlwph

ftyk % iVuk

jkT; % fcgkj

ekStk@xzke

losZ@Cykd@la- (IyksV la-)

lc&Mho&la-

{ks=kiQy

gsDVs;j

vkjs

oxZ ehVj

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

jkeckn

1639

00

00

88

Fkkuk uacj&7@110

1640

00

01

64

1641

00

04

12

1642

00

04

02

1643

00

03

46

1644

00

00

20

1671

00

04

57

1670

00

10

49

1675

00

00

20

1669

00

03

41

1676

00

03

79

1677

00

02

52

1679

00

00

20

1678

00

02

42

1688

00

03

05

1683

00

00

73

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4497

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4498

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1682

00

00

20

1684

00

02

61

1685

00

00

27

1687

00

01

36

1686

00

00

72

1697

00

01

14

1698

00

02

03

1699

00

06

15

1700

00

00

20

1702

00

03

47

1854

00

00

20

1855

00

00

20

1703

00

02

16

1706

00

01

13

1707

00

01

05

1856

00

00

48

1857

00

02

36

1710

00

00

20

1858

00

02

87

1859

00

03

93

1860

00

03

16

1836

00

00

20

1876

00

01

86

1861

00

02

18

1877

00

00

20

1862

00

02

74

1837

00

06

06

1625

00

00

20

1863

00

00

20

1864

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4499

1838

00

01

77

1839

00

00

20

1622

00

00

63

1621

00

02

44

1840

00

00

20

1620

00

05

63

1619

00

03

45

1618

00

01

86

1617

00

03

06

1616

00

02

31

1615

00

01

59

1614

00

01

34

1611

00

01

66

1609

00

03

15

1607

00

08

13

1603

00

03

60

1600

00

04

56

1598

00

00

74

1555

00

00

20

1555@1906

00

26

08

1584

00

00

32

1585

00

00

20

1583

00

02

54

1582

00

01

81

1581

00

02

41

1580

00

02

34

1579

00

02

59

1578

00

10

34

1577

00

08

12

1569

00

05

19

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4500

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1570

00

03

91

1568 ¼jkLrk½

00

01

00

1437

00

01

37

1438

00

01

65

1439

00

01

52

1440

00

01

92

1441

00

01

68

1442

00

02

20

1443

00

01

67

1444

00

01

21

1425

00

05

27

1424

00

02

52

1423

00

02

17

1422

00

02

12

1420@1910

00

02

45

1421

00

01

03

1420

00

01

29

1419

00

01

46

1418

00

00

20

1417

00

01

89

1416

00

01

11

1415

00

01

57

1414

00

02

17

1406

00

02

04

1405

00

01

46

1404

00

02

73

1403

00

02

31

1402

00

04

08

1398

00

02

65

1397

00

09

45

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4501

1396

00

00

28

jkeiqj nhvjk rkSQhj

246

00

03

96

Fkkuk uacj&7@109

245

00

02

17

244

00

02

00

243

00

07

80

242

00

05

32

241

00

03

02

240

00

02

30

239

00

00

68

238

00

00

20

jkeiqj nhvjk

924

00

00

67

Fkkuk uacj&07@108

923

00

05

64

922

00

02

42

921

00

03

56

920

00

02

26

919

00

00

20

917

00

07

00

911

00

02

90

917@944

00

02

38

910

00

07

31

905

00

05

45

904

00

06

20

903

00

04

37

902

00

00

20

901

00

01

78

899

00

00

86

900

00

01

10

898

00

03

83

897

00

10

03

890

00

01

48

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4502

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

889

00

02

02

888

00

07

72

887

00

07

78

866

00

00

20

868

00

01

81

869

00

01

60

870

00

01

69

828

00

02

75

827

00

02

38

826

00

03

37

825

00

01

99

824

00

02

52

823

00

01

70

822

00

02

30

818

00

06

85

820

00

00

20

819

00

00

20

817

00

07

54

816

00

07

14

775

00

00

20

774

00

00

20

776

00

00

20

777

00

00

42

778

00

00

54

779

00

00

94

780

00

01

09

781

00

04

01

783

00

00

20

782

00

05

14

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4503

dhVk pkSgÙkj

6209

00

01

04

Fkkuk uacj&6

6208

00

00

20

6213

00

03

16

6207

00

00

74

6215

00

03

96

6206

00

00

20

6205

00

03

83

6204

00

03

17

6203

00

01

27

6202

00

00

34

6199

00

02

36

6198

00

01

92

6197

00

01

36

6196

00

01

13

6193

00

01

58

6192

00

02

72

6191

00

01

37

6187

00

13

90

6181

00

05

47

6175

00

02

17

6176

00

00

20

6174

00

01

69

6173

00

03

43

6170

00

02

33

6169

00

02

34

6168

00

02

59

6141

00

00

20

6140

00

00

20

6142

00

12

97

6143

00

18

76

6119

00

08

66

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4504

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

6118

00

13

69

6111@6885

00

33

58

6094

00

00

56

2202

00

38

69

1287

00

07

94

1288

00

12

62

1289

00

10

16

1298

00

00

20

1297

00

00

32

1290

00

00

20

1296

00

31

80

1334

00

21

06

1360

00

15

88

1361

00

06

72

1362

00

11

12

1363

00

04

84

1364

00

05

45

760

00

02

22

761

00

01

43

762

00

01

16

763

00

02

05

764

00

02

33

765

00

01

61

766

00

08

44

767

00

02

80

768

00

03

01

769

00

02

53

770

00

02

33

771

00

02

63

772

00

03

02

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4505

773

00

01

45

774

00

01

45

775

00

01

32

776

00

01

66

777

00

01

69

778

00

01

56

783

00

08

51

784

00

20

57

663

00

14

22

664

00

05

98

666

00

04

32

666@6944

00

02

09

667

00

05

68

668

00

24

97

714

00

05

57

713

00

15

42

712

00

15

38

683

00

02

22

684

00

12

65

685

00

06

19

686

00

05

56

687

00

19

15

688@7043

00

41

81

688@7027

00

00

29

688@7026

00

04

87

688@7025

00

08

30

688@7024

00

13

15

688@7023

00

04

74

82

00

40

30

81

00

11

82

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4506

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

80

00

17

52

79

00

13

19

78

00

07

33

77

00

07

86

76

00

07

30

75

00

04

22

67

00

00

20

74

00

04

55

73

00

10

19

72

00

08

48

74@6901

00

54

53

1@7102

00

15

58

1@7103

00

40

21

1@7119

00

04

81

1@7106

00

00

20

1@7105

00

62

45

¹iQk- la- vkj&25011@16@2013&vksvkj&Iº

iou oqQekj] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 5th August, 2013

S.O. 1629.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest

that a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited in Dist. Patna in the State of Bihar for ‘Patna

to Motihari and Baitalpur Pipeline’ for the transportation of Petroleum Product;

And, whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is

necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which

is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and

Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby

declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the

date on which the copies of the notification issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as

published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of

the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land, to Shri Arun Kumar Jha B.A.S. &

Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited. (Pipelines Division) P.O. Dhelwan, Sipara, Dist.

Patna (Bihar.) Pin–800020.

SCHEDULE

Dist.: Patna

State : Bihar

Mouja / Village

Survey/Block No.

Sub-Div-No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

RAMBAD

1639

00

00

88

Thana Number 7/110

1640

00

01

64

1641

00

04

12

1642

00

04

02

1643

00

03

46

1644

00

00

20

1671

00

04

57

1670

00

10

49

1675

00

00

20

1669

00

03

41

1676

00

03

79

1677

00

02

52

1679

00

00

20

1678

00

02

42

1688

00

03

05

1683

00

00

73

1682

00

00

20

1684

00

02

61

1685

00

00

27

1687

00

01

36

1686

00

00

72

1697

00

01

14

1698

00

02

03

1699

00

06

15

1700

00

00

20

1702

00

03

47

1854

00

00

20

1855

00

00

20

1703

00

02

16

1706

00

01

13

1707

00

01

05

1856

00

00

48

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4507

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4508

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1857

00

02

36

1710

00

00

20

1858

00

02

87

1859

00

03

93

1860

00

03

16

1836

00

00

20

1876

00

01

86

1861

00

02

18

1877

00

00

20

1862

00

02

74

1837

00

06

06

1625

00

00

20

1863

00

00

20

1864

00

00

20

1838

00

01

77

1839

00

00

20

1622

00

00

63

1621

00

02

44

1840

00

00

20

1620

00

05

63

1619

00

03

45

1618

00

01

86

1617

00

03

06

1616

00

02

31

1615

00

01

59

1614

00

01

34

1611

00

01

66

1609

00

03

15

1607

00

08

13

1603

00

03

60

1600

00

04

56

1598

00

00

74

1555

00

00

20

1555/1906

00

26

08

1584

00

00

32

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4509

1585

00

00

20

1583

00

02

54

1582

00

01

81

1581

00

02

41

1580

00

02

34

1579

00

02

59

1578

00

10

34

1577

00

08

12

1569

00

05

19

1570

00

03

91

1568 (Road)

00

01

00

1437

00

01

37

1438

00

01

65

1439

00

01

52

1440

00

01

92

1441

00

01

68

1442

00

02

20

1443

00

01

67

1444

00

01

21

1425

00

05

27

1424

00

02

52

1423

00

02

17

1422

00

02

12

1420/1910

00

02

45

1421

00

01

03

1420

00

01

29

1419

00

01

46

1418

00

00

20

1417

00

01

89

1416

00

01

11

1415

00

01

57

1414

00

02

17

1406

00

02

04

1405

00

01

46

1404

00

02

73

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4510

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1403

00

02

31

1402

00

04

08

1398

00

02

65

1397

00

09

45

1396

00

00

28

RAMPUR DIARA TAUFIR

246

00

03

96

Thana Number :- 7/109

245

00

02

17

244

00

02

00

243

00

07

80

242

00

05

32

241

00

03

02

240

00

02

30

239

00

00

68

238

00

00

20

RAMPUR DIARA

924

00

00

67

Thana Number :-07/108

923

00

05

64

922

00

02

42

921

00

03

56

920

00

02

26

919

00

00

20

917

00

07

00

911

00

02

90

917 / 944

00

02

38

910

00

07

31

905

00

05

45

904

00

06

20

903

00

04

37

902

00

00

20

901

00

01

78

899

00

00

86

900

00

01

10

898

00

03

83

897

00

10

03

890

00

01

48

889

00

02

02

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4511

888

00

07

72

887

00

07

78

866

00

00

20

868

00

01

81

869

00

01

60

870

00

01

69

828

00

02

75

827

00

02

38

826

00

03

37

825

00

01

99

824

00

02

52

823

00

01

70

822

00

02

30

818

00

06

85

820

00

00

20

819

00

00

20

817

00

07

54

816

00

07

14

775

00

00

20

774

00

00

20

776

00

00

20

777

00

00

42

778

00

00

54

779

00

00

94

780

00

01

09

781

00

04

01

783

00

00

20

782

00

05

14

KITA CHAUHATTAR

6209

00

01

04

Thana Number :- 6

6208

00

00

20

6213

00

03

16

6207

00

00

74

6215

00

03

96

6206

00

00

20

6205

00

03

83

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4512

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

6204

00

03

17

6203

00

01

27

6202

00

00

34

6199

00

02

36

6198

00

01

92

6197

00

01

36

6196

00

01

13

6193

00

01

58

6192

00

02

72

6191

00

01

37

6187

00

13

90

6181

00

05

47

6175

00

02

17

6176

00

00

20

6174

00

01

69

6173

00

03

43

6170

00

02

33

6169

00

02

34

6168

00

02

59

6141

00

00

20

6140

00

00

20

6142

00

12

97

6143

00

18

76

6119

00

08

66

6118

00

13

69

6111/6885

00

33

58

6094

00

00

56

2202

00

38

69

1287

00

07

94

1288

00

12

62

1289

00

10

16

1298

00

00

20

1297

00

00

32

1290

00

00

20

1296

00

31

80

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4513

1334

00

21

06

1360

00

15

88

1361

00

06

72

1362

00

11

12

1363

00

04

84

1364

00

05

45

760

00

02

22

761

00

01

43

762

00

01

16

763

00

02

05

764

00

02

33

765

00

01

61

766

00

08

44

767

00

02

80

768

00

03

01

769

00

02

53

770

00

02

33

771

00

02

63

772

00

03

02

773

00

01

45

774

00

01

45

775

00

01

32

776

00

01

66

777

00

01

69

778

00

01

56

783

00

08

51

784

00

20

57

663

00

14

22

664

00

05

98

666

00

04

32

666/6944

00

02

09

667

00

05

68

668

00

24

97

714

00

05

57

713

00

15

42

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4514

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

712

00

15

38

683

00

02

22

684

00

12

65

685

00

06

19

686

00

05

56

687

00

19

15

688 / 7043

00

41

81

688 / 7027

00

00

29

688 / 7026

00

04

87

688 / 7025

00

08

30

688 / 7024

00

13

15

688 / 7023

00

04

74

82

00

40

30

81

00

11

82

80

00

17

52

79

00

13

19

78

00

07

33

77

00

07

86

76

00

07

30

75

00

04

22

67

00

00

20

74

00

04

55

73

00

10

19

72

00

08

48

74 / 6901

00

54

53

1 / 7102

00

15

58

1 / 7103

00

40

21

1 / 7119

00

04

81

1 / 7106

00

00

20

1 / 7105

00

62

45

[F. No. R-25011/16/2013-OR-I]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

ubZ fnYyh] 5 vxLr] 2013

dk-vk-

1630-—dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slk izrhr gksrk gS fd yksd fgr esa ;g vko”;d gS fd iVuk ls eksfrgkjh vkSj csrkyiqj

rd isVªksfy;e inkFkks± ds ifjogu gsrq ftyk iwoZ paikju] jkT; fcgkj esa bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs”ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkuh

pkfg, A

vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slh ikbiykbu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, vko”;d izrhr gksrk gS fd ml Hkwfe esa ftlds Hkhrj

mDr ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkus dk izLrko gS vkSj tks bl vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa of.kZr gS] mi;ksx dk vtZu fd;k tk,(

vr% vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] iSVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbUl ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½ vf/kfu;e] 1962 ¼1962

dk 50½ dh /kkjk 3 dh mi&/kkjk¼1½ }kjk iznÙk “kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] mDr Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/akdkj dk vtZu djus ds vius

vk”k; dh ?kks’k.kk djrh gSA

dksbZ O;fDr] tks mDr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa fgrc) gS] ml rkjh[k ls ftldks] Hkkjr ds jkti= esa ;Fkk izdkf”kr bl

vfèklwpuk dh izfr;ka lk/kkj.k turk dks miyC/k djk nh tkrh gS] bDdhl fnu ds vUnj] Hkwfe ds Hkhrj ikbiykbu fcNk, tkus gsrq

mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj ds vtZu ds fy,] Jh v:.k dqekj >k] fc-iz-ls- o l{ke izkf/kdkjh bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs”ku fyfeVsM] ¼ikbiykbu

fMohtu½ iVuk] iks-vks- <syok] flikjk] ftyk iVuk] fiu% 800020] fcgkj dks fyf[kr :i eas vk{ksi Hkst ldsxkA

vuqlwph

ftyk % iwoZ paikju

jkT; % fcgkj

ekStk@xzke

losZ@Cykd@la- (IyksV la-)

lc&Mho&la-

{ks=kiQy

gsDVs;j

vkjs

oxZ ehVj

1

2

3

4

5

6

nkeks chjrh

1169

00

15

34

Fkkuk uacj&177

1172

00

00

20

1168

00

01

43

1167

00

06

15

1166

00

00

81

1164

00

00

92

1163

00

11

73

1161

00

00

20

1162

00

14

54

1159

00

01

85

1058 jkLrk

00

04

77

652

00

00

20

648

00

12

32

645

00

10

91

646

00

06

70

643

00

03

43

642

00

03

35

647

00

00

20

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4515

1

2

3

4

5

6

4516

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

641

00

04

28

611

00

06

26

613

00

00

45

612

00

09

40

609

00

05

28

445

00

11

73

444

00

00

20

446

00

02

87

455

00

10

65

447

00

00

20

454

00

10

17

461

00

00

20

462

00

06

26

460

00

00

20

463

00

07

64

466

00

07

07

465

00

03

46

467

00

03

83

468

00

00

20

469

00

02

09

471

00

01

83

479

00

25

53

491

00

00

20

482

00

00

20

478

00

00

20

480

00

12

79

516

00

00

20

481

00

00

20

524

00

02

29

518

00

04

82

520

00

04

54

521

00

00

20

522

00

00

20

519

00

15

02

514

00

00

20

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4517

1

2

3

4

5

6

517

00

00

20

512

00

01

96

uokMk

1942

00

04

14

Fkkuk uacj&180

1943

00

00

69

1944

00

00

20

1941

00

07

70

1938

00

01

00

1939

00

00

20

1936

00

03

04

1937

00

12

37

1931

00

00

20

1930

00

02

73

1880

00

00

20

1881

00

18

15

1879

00

02

63

1876

00

06

64

1882

00

06

02

1874

00

04

19

1873

00

00

20

1884

00

01

51

1885

00

09

91

1886

00

00

20

1889

00

03

78

1887

00

00

26

1888

00

03

28

1890

00

00

20

1784

00

06

97

1785

00

05

29

1786

00

00

20

1783

00

00

20

1781

00

04

46

1782

00

05

19

1678

00

00

20

1679

00

06

29

1680

00

00

92

1

2

3

4

5

6

4518

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1681

00

06

17

1683

00

00

20

1684

00

00

20

1683@2060

00

01

47

1682

00

03

30

1698

00

06

60

1699

00

00

73

1697

00

01

23

1711

00

02

82

1709

00

00

20

1710

00

08

10

1712

00

00

65

1715@2062

00

08

03

1714

00

00

85

1715

00

08

55

1521

00

00

20

1519

00

00

20

1520

00

05

87

1716

00

00

20

1487

00

10

17

1486

00

04

62

1489

00

05

41

1495

00

03

13

1491

00

00

20

1490

00

00

20

1494

00

01

68

1496

00

07

70

1510

00

00

20

1497

00

01

23

1509

00

06

69

1502

00

09

66

1475

00

00

20

1503

00

06

56

1474

00

03

50

1471

00

00

20

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4519

1

2

3

4

5

6

1472@2052

00

00

20

1473

00

07

46

1553

00

00

20

1472

00

03

15

1427

00

07

08

1428

00

08

11

1429

00

03

62

1430

00

00

20

1425

00

00

20

1424

00

04

36

1423

00

06

13

1422

00

00

54

1407

00

06

50

1412

00

00

20

1411

00

02

36

1410

00

15

27

1415

00

01

11

1133 jkLrk

00

15

36

1130

00

00

20

1131

00

01

98

1129

00

00

20

1132

00

14

27

222

00

07

85

221

00

00

20

223

00

02

06

224

00

00

48

220

00

13

98

219

00

00

20

218

00

00

70

oksYgk

1051

00

00

20

Fkkuk uacj&165

1052

00

03

65

1038

00

12

81

1039

00

08

08

1040

00

08

83

1041

00

00

20

1

2

3

4

5

6

4520

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

felhj Vksyk

496

00

00

39

Fkkuk uacj&163

493

00

10

16

502

00

06

21

503

00

09

20

505

00

01

04

504

00

00

83

364

00

00

20

479

00

10

26

480

00

00

90

478

00

08

34

477

00

06

18

365

00

02

39

386

00

04

38

389

00

00

20

387

00

05

22

388

00

02

53

384

00

05

37

370

00

00

20

385

00

00

20

383

00

06

83

382

00

00

20

378

00

10

10

379

00

02

30

377

00

00

84

330 jkLrk

00

01

80

329 jkLrk

00

03

31

310 jkLrk

00

02

21

317

00

00

20

318

00

11

94

301 dsuky

00

01

68

300

00

04

21

299

00

07

04

248

00

12

11

247

00

01

32

249

00

08

04

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4521

1

2

3

4

5

6

246

00

04

37

283 jkLrk

00

02

71

266

00

09

21

267

00

02

98

267@499

00

01

80

263

00

00

20

262

00

00

20

264

00

16

56

255

00

00

20

260

00

02

29

257

00

06

30

258

00

03

11

129

00

14

21

131

00

01

25

152

00

11

49

151

00

02

51

150

00

06

71

140

00

05

98

139

00

00

67

138

00

00

20

141

00

12

13

142

00

00

20

93

00

11

71

92 jkLrk

00

02

07

143

00

00

88

90

00

14

40

91

00

00

20

89

00

17

17

88

00

00

20

85

00

00

65

86

00

20

49

87

00

00

20

2

00

36

63

28

00

04

16

27

00

21

22

1

2

3

4

5

6

4522

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

26

00

01

71

25

00

00

20

21

00

00

46

1 ukyk

00

02

61

511 ukyk

00

01

75

vghj xuok

402

00

03

95

Fkkuk uacj&162

401

00

09

60

400 jkLrk

00

04

55

399

00

06

52

398

00

14

48

396

00

11

33

44

00

14

56

46

00

16

28

51

00

06

38

36

00

52

21

17

00

09

76

16

00

13

18

15

00

11

16

jkeiqjok

246

00

12

46

Fkkuk uacj&160

261

00

19

27

262

00

05

95

260

00

12

32

263

00

00

20

282

00

06

48

265

00

11

66

281

00

02

37

279

00

02

57

280

00

20

24

277

00

00

20

294

00

22

88

295

00

00

20

296

00

02

14

297

00

27

58

328

00

00

20

336 jkLrk

00

06

58

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4523

1

2

3

4

5

6

337

00

02

51

7

00

20

77

6

00

00

20

9

00

07

48

8

00

05

49

10

00

01

95

11

00

00

20

12 ukyk

00

04

05

xk; ?kkV

213 es[kok unh

00

06

55

Fkkuk uacj&153

214 es[kok unh

00

07

24

215 es[kok unh

00

02

12

216

00

10

01

217

00

00

20

208

00

08

25

220

00

13

38

221

00

15

24

230

01

12

26

144 LVsV gkbos 4

00

03

19

265

00

00

20

262

00

02

59

143 dPpk jkLrk

00

02

26

128

00

32

56

139

00

05

21

112

00

11

08

142

00

53

19

97

00

00

34

96

00

03

34

93

00

05

36

91

00

10

84

89

00

00

20

87

00

00

20

88

00

10

54

85

00

07

43

86

00

00

20

84

00

10

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

4524

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

83

00

00

59

81

00

07

94

82

00

00

66

yksfg;kj mtSu

267 jkLrk

00

04

28

Fkkuk uacj&133

jkLrk

00

04

02

2745

00

08

06

2746

00

02

60

2747

00

13

55

2748

00

03

11

2753

00

01

12

2752

00

03

15

2761

00

19

63

2762

00

00

20

2764

00

05

73

2760

00

00

57

2759

00

02

82

2682 jkLrk

00

01

89

2765

00

10

36

2768

00

08

97

2785

00

18

02

2767

00

06

73

2787

00

01

06

2786 jkLrk

00

00

26

2678

00

06

73

2676

00

30

79

2677

00

02

63

2675

00

00

26

2654

00

14

50

2650

00

07

94

2656

00

06

23

2655

00

04

73

2644

00

13

91

2646

00

09

72

2647

00

19

08

2611

00

21

85

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4525

1

2

3

4

5

6

2607

00

04

76

2606

00

00

96

2605

00

09

84

2597

00

06

05

2598

00

00

20

2595

00

11

61

2596

00

10

15

2589

00

19

22

2588

00

00

20

2573

00

12

93

2572

00

17

21

3010

00

07

91

2574

00

01

53

2570

00

03

24

2568

00

07

83

2563

00

04

67

2564

00

00

20

2566

00

14

29

2567

00

00

52

2553

00

51

55

2554

00

10

34

1764

00

00

20

1765

00

00

66

1727

00

00

20

1762

00

18

84

1729

00

05

87

1730

00

07

46

1725

00

21

27

1724

00

02

66

1721

00

34

09

1622 jkLrk

00

03

38

1709

00

00

20

1708

00

00

20

1623 ukyk

00

06

73

1545

00

39

54

1

2

3

4

5

6

4526

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1544

00

00

20

1543

00

07

15

1546

00

05

74

1542

00

25

78

1541

00

08

91

1540

00

00

20

1522 ¼³/kukmrh unh½

00

12

17

t;flagiqj

4291

00

07

14

Fkkuk uacj&85

4292

00

04

23

4289

00

03

96

4250 jkLrk

00

03

82

4286

00

08

30

4283

00

03

82

4284

00

01

42

4282

00

07

15

4272

00

04

34

4281

00

11

64

4280

00

12

95

4278

00

09

30

4277

00

07

58

4298

00

09

37

4305

00

00

20

4299

00

10

61

4300

00

02

15

4301

00

00

20

4538 dPpk jkLrk

00

28

10

4541

00

03

05

4540

00

01

15

4539

00

00

20

4537

00

06

41

4536

00

02

67

4502 jkLrk

00

03

60

4464

00

17

45

4489

00

08

20

4490

00

00

20

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4527

1

2

3

4

5

6

4488

00

13

68

4467

00

00

20

4483

00

05

05

4480

00

03

68

4482

00

00

97

4472

00

00

20

4481

00

02

15

4473

00

05

60

4437

00

01

77

4474

00

12

22

4477

00

15

42

4418

00

00

20

4505

00

00

20

4475

00

00

20

4476

00

00

20

4436

00

00

20

4435

00

15

08

4427

00

26

87

4425

00

04

20

4426

00

09

60

4424

00

13

77

4445

00

00

40

4381

00

20

75

4392

00

00

20

4391

00

00

45

4382

00

00

62

4383

00

00

20

4390

00

13

64

4389@6841

00

01

89

4389

00

10

57

4388

00

00

75

4013 jkLrk

00

04

97

4015

00

22

21

4020

00

00

20

4019

00

19

67

1

2

3

4

5

6

4528

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

4021

00

00

68

4022

00

22

69

4023

00

11

77

3968

00

00

39

3964 jkLrk

00

05

71

2744

00

07

10

2743

00

00

32

2745

00

17

66

2747

00

27

00

2746

00

00

20

2739

00

00

20

2748

00

17

63

2749

00

00

20

2727

00

03

30

2738

00

00

94

2728

00

04

11

2729

00

09

09

2731

00

09

73

2732

00

07

41

2730

00

05

17

2532 jkLrk

00

04

69

2523

00

11

42

2524

00

08

74

2525

00

06

33

2526

00

02

11

2501

00

01

28

2502

00

00

20

2500

00

09

14

2499

00

05

57

2498

00

08

50

2432

00

15

71

2433

00

00

20

2449

00

07

09

2431

00

14

01

2450

00

06

74

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4529

1

2

3

4

5

6

2451

00

08

71

2454

00

00

20

2453

00

00

20

2430

00

00

66

2387

00

31

89

2461@6829

00

04

99

2462

00

00

20

2463

00

00

80

2386

00

01

63

2368 jkLrk

00

05

71

2385

00

00

20

2366

00

01

21

2367

00

06

95

2365

00

00

20

2360

00

28

27

2364

00

01

20

2361

00

00

40

2363

00

00

20

2359

00

00

89

2358

00

00

31

489

00

16

06

490

00

01

01

484

00

04

81

491

00

07

36

492

00

09

09

493

00

02

56

495

00

19

16

518

00

09

60

523

00

03

99

522

00

05

97

526

00

06

36

525

00

00

20

535

00

03

73

527

00

02

92

528

00

01

06

1

2

3

4

5

6

4530

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

530

00

01

82

529

00

01

04

532

00

01

48

531

00

01

91

533

00

05

02

534

00

08

60

177

00

00

20

171

00

02

00

170

00

06

59

169

00

08

12

172

00

00

61

173

00

05

13

174

00

00

20

175

00

08

58

164

00

02

89

165

00

05

37

159

00

05

86

160

00

01

52

142

00

09

81

143

00

00

20

144

00

02

03

146

00

02

74

145

00

04

88

147

00

07

17

148

00

03

74

155

00

00

20

154

00

01

68

151

00

08

38

152

00

00

20

110

00

10

08

91

00

00

56

92

00

00

20

109

00

07

07

108

00

10

01

107

00

04

82

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4531

1

2

3

4

5

6

106

00

00

72

104

00

06

18

99

00

07

95

93

00

00

20

100

00

02

01

53 ukyk

00

01

54

51

00

10

75

52

00

00

20

39 jkLrk

00

04

70

38

00

10

03

37

00

06

02

36

00

07

66

32

00

06

81

30

00

01

85

33

00

06

40

25

00

15

72

24

00

00

20

23

00

07

47

722

00

00

20

723

00

07

51

730

00

08

26

731

00

00

20

16

00

06

29

9

00

04

70

741

00

08

73

743

00

00

20

740

00

11

36

744

00

01

76

749

00

07

11

748

00

00

20

763

00

09

93

762

00

09

93

752

00

00

52

753

00

06

29

761

00

01

62

1

2

3

4

5

6

4532

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

754

00

04

77

760

00

02

02

759

00

04

80

755

00

00

96

758

00

06

33

757

00

11

16

767

00

00

20

769

00

00

94

768

00

10

94

csyok jk; Vksyk cSjkxh

292

00

07

65

Fkkuk uacj&72

291

00

03

05

290

00

03

65

288

00

05

27

291@1824

00

00

20

287

00

06

79

286@1826

00

02

78

285

00

05

51

286

00

00

20

284

00

14

94

284@1831

00

04

29

282

00

00

34

281

00

03

08

272

00

00

20

280

00

17

94

279

00

00

20

276

00

08

75

274

00

00

20

275

00

03

48

277

00

02

69

225 jkLrk

00

10

04

218

00

07

25

217

00

05

71

20

00

31

08

216

00

02

03

21

00

10

02

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4533

1

2

3

4

5

6

15

00

13

13

14

00

00

20

19

00

01

06

16

00

09

59

17

00

00

20

18

00

00

20

13

00

08

61

11

00

04

33

10

00

02

48

8

00

08

54

9

00

00

20

4

00

21

68

3

00

00

20

78dPpk jkLrk

00

02

42

1

00

00

20

csyok jk; Vksyk ukjh vkjok

263

00

17

05

Fkkuk uacj&71

265

00

00

20

262

00

00

20

268

00

01

86

267

00

05

22

269

00

03

19

271

00

00

27

270

00

13

86

275

00

00

92

276

00

06

47

285 dsuky

00

05

05

284

00

11

21

282

00

00

30

247

00

12

36

248

00

00

20

245

00

00

64

244

00

00

20

243@1653

00

07

14

243

00

04

79

240

00

00

20

1

2

3

4

5

6

4534

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

242

00

06

46

241

00

00

63

231

00

07

38

229

00

00

20

230

00

07

20

210

00

04

72

209

00

17

72

208

00

04

39

Nijk Hkkl

8120

00

02

73

Fkkuk uacj&56

8121

00

03

52

8122

00

00

20

8119

00

08

93

8116

00

05

23

8117

00

04

80

8114

00

00

20

8113

00

07

02

8115

00

05

17

8112

00

10

31

8110

00

00

20

8111

00

00

92

8109

00

06

51

7942

00

00

20

7943

00

00

20

7944

00

00

20

8106

00

05

13

8105

00

04

19

8107

00

00

94

8108

00

00

20

8104@8162

00

02

33

8104

00

05

11

8103

00

03

44

8101

00

00

20

8102

00

12

51

8097

00

00

20

8098

00

23

85

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4535

1

2

3

4

5

6

7969

00

00

20

8096

00

00

20

8095

00

07

40

8094

00

00

77

8093

00

08

45

7980

00

07

53

8091

00

01

17

8092

00

00

20

8089

00

29

20

8088 jkLrk

00

05

09

8087

00

05

44

8085

00

00

20

8086¹dsuky

00

03

10

8084

00

18

49

8083

00

12

47

8081

00

02

06

8082

00

05

18

8080

00

05

31

8079

00

13

57

8077

00

09

61

8078

00

00

20

8063

00

07

90

8075

00

08

65

8074

00

05

87

8065

00

00

20

8066

00

07

43

8073

00

09

58

8072

00

00

20

8067

00

03

69

8059

00

03

29

8056

00

04

25

8048

00

05

20

8047

00

03

45

8042

00

04

43

8039

00

04

34

1

2

3

4

5

6

4536

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

8041

00

00

57

8038

00

05

04

8040

00

01

07

6436

00

00

69

8037

00

08

46

8036

00

00

20

6437

00

04

65

8035

00

00

47

6442

00

01

55

6443

00

00

20

8032

00

07

95

8031

00

05

32

8028

00

07

27

8027

00

03

35

6445

00

05

27

8026

00

00

20

7516

00

05

59

7513

00

03

79

7517

00

09

93

7519

00

00

82

7520

00

00

20

7535

00

00

20

7524

00

06

29

7521

00

00

20

7523

00

01

94

7522

00

01

84

7507

00

08

96

7500

00

14

25

7501

00

00

20

7499

00

00

20

7498

00

00

40

7497

00

22

42

7380

00

00

20

7496

00

01

88

7492

00

01

74

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4537

1

2

3

4

5

6

7493

00

05

87

7489

00

00

20

7490

00

05

61

7488

00

10

63

7486

00

07

27

7484

00

00

79

7491

00

12

02

7483

00

00

20

7386

00

00

20

7479

00

00

52

7478

00

10

02

7475

00

00

37

7476

00

02

43

7477

00

02

93

7463

00

03

45

7464

00

00

20

7461

00

09

20

7462

00

08

30

7447 jkLrk

00

04

18

6501

00

27

75

6502

00

06

60

6503

00

11

78

5971

00

00

69

5970

00

00

98

5969

00

05

85

5964

00

01

19

5965

00

07

17

5967

00

03

17

5966

00

02

76

5940

00

17

73

5939

00

03

93

5929

00

07

93

5938

00

01

88

5930

00

16

42

5924

00

02

53

1

2

3

4

5

6

4538

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

5918

00

07

16

5919

00

00

20

5932

00

00

20

5917

00

06

94

5916

00

05

98

5898

00

00

20

5900

00

00

20

5901

00

31

61

5905

00

00

20

5906

00

03

08

¹iQk- la- vkj-&25011@17@2013&vksvkj&Iº

iou oqQekj] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 5th August, 2013

S.O. 1630.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that a

pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited in Dist. East Champaran in the State of Bihar for ‘Patna to

Motihari and Baitalpur Pipeline’ for the transportation of Petroleum Product;

And, whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is

necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which is

described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals

Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its

intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on

which the copies of the notification issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette

of India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying

of the pipeline under the land, to Shri Arun Kumar Jha B.A.S. & Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited.

(Pipelines Division) P.O. Dhelwan, Sipara, Dist. Patna (Bihar.) Pin – 800020.

SCHEDULE

Dist.: Purba Champaran

State : Bihar

Mouja / Village

Survey/Block No.

Sub-Div-No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

DAMO BIRTI

1169

00

15

34

Thana No:-177

1172

00

00

20

1168

00

01

43

1167

00

06

15

1166

00

00

81

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4539

1

2

3

4

5

6

1164

00

00

92

1163

00

11

73

1161

00

00

20

1162

00

14

54

1159

00

01

85

1058(ROAD)

00

04

77

652

00

00

20

648

00

12

32

645

00

10

91

646

00

06

70

643

00

03

43

642

00

03

35

647

00

00

20

641

00

04

28

611

00

06

26

613

00

00

45

612

00

09

40

609

00

05

28

445

00

11

73

444

00

00

20

446

00

02

87

455

00

10

65

447

00

00

20

454

00

10

17

461

00

00

20

462

00

06

26

460

00

00

20

463

00

07

64

466

00

07

07

465

00

03

46

467

00

03

83

468

00

00

20

469

00

02

09

471

00

01

83

479

00

25

53

491

00

00

20

482

00

00

20

478

00

00

20

480

00

12

79

516

00

00

20

481

00

00

20

524

00

02

29

1

2

3

4

5

6

4540

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

518

00

04

82

520

00

04

54

521

00

00

20

522

00

00

20

519

00

15

02

514

00

00

20

517

00

00

20

512

00

01

96

NAWADA

1942

00

04

14

Thana No:-180

1943

00

00

69

1944

00

00

20

1941

00

07

70

1938

00

01

00

1939

00

00

20

1936

00

03

04

1937

00

12

37

1931

00

00

20

1930

00

02

73

1880

00

00

20

1881

00

18

15

1879

00

02

63

1876

00

06

64

1882

00

06

02

1874

00

04

19

1873

00

00

20

1884

00

01

51

1885

00

09

91

1886

00

00

20

1889

00

03

78

1887

00

00

26

1888

00

03

28

1890

00

00

20

1784

00

06

97

1785

00

05

29

1786

00

00

20

1783

00

00

20

1781

00

04

46

1782

00

05

19

1678

00

00

20

1679

00

06

29

1680

00

00

92

1681

00

06

17

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4541

1

2

3

4

5

6

1683

00

00

20

1684

00

00

20

1683/2060

00

01

47

1682

00

03

30

1698

00

06

60

1699

00

00

73

1697

00

01

23

1711

00

02

82

1709

00

00

20

1710

00

08

10

1712

00

00

65

1715/2062

00

08

03

1714

00

00

85

1715

00

08

55

1521

00

00

20

1519

00

00

20

1520

00

05

87

1716

00

00

20

1487

00

10

17

1486

00

04

62

1489

00

05

41

1495

00

03

13

1491

00

00

20

1490

00

00

20

1494

00

01

68

1496

00

07

70

1510

00

00

20

1497

00

01

23

1509

00

06

69

1502

00

09

66

1475

00

00

20

1503

00

06

56

1474

00

03

50

1471

00

00

20

1472/2052

00

00

20

1473

00

07

46

1553

00

00

20

1472

00

03

15

1427

00

07

08

1428

00

08

11

1429

00

03

62

1430

00

00

20

1

2

3

4

5

6

4542

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1425

00

00

20

1424

00

04

36

1423

00

06

13

1422

00

00

54

1407

00

06

50

1412

00

00

20

1411

00

02

36

1410

00

15

27

1415

00

01

11

1133(ROAD)

00

15

36

1130

00

00

20

1131

00

01

98

1129

00

00

20

1132

00

14

27

222

00

07

85

221

00

00

20

223

00

02

06

224

00

00

48

220

00

13

98

219

00

00

20

218

00

00

70

WOLHA

1051

00

00

20

Thana No:-165

1052

00

03

65

1038

00

12

81

1039

00

08

08

1040

00

08

83

1041

00

00

20

MISIR TOLA

496

00

00

39

Thana No:-163

493

00

10

16

502

00

06

21

503

00

09

20

505

00

01

04

504

00

00

83

364

00

00

20

479

00

10

26

480

00

00

90

478

00

08

34

477

00

06

18

365

00

02

39

386

00

04

38

389

00

00

20

387

00

05

22

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4543

1

2

3

4

5

6

388

00

02

53

384

00

05

37

370

00

00

20

385

00

00

20

383

00

06

83

382

00

00

20

378

00

10

10

379

00

02

30

377

00

00

84

330-Road

00

01

80

329-Road

00

03

31

310-Road

00

02

21

317

00

00

20

318

00

11

94

301-Canal

00

01

68

300

00

04

21

299

00

07

04

248

00

12

11

247

00

01

32

249

00

08

04

246

00

04

37

283-Road

00

02

71

266

00

09

21

267

00

02

98

267/499

00

01

80

263

00

00

20

262

00

00

20

264

00

16

56

255

00

00

20

260

00

02

29

257

00

06

30

258

00

03

11

129

00

14

21

131

00

01

25

152

00

11

49

151

00

02

51

150

00

06

71

140

00

05

98

139

00

00

67

138

00

00

20

141

00

12

13

142

00

00

20

1

2

3

4

5

6

4544

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

93

00

11

71

92-Road

00

02

07

143

00

00

88

90

00

14

40

91

00

00

20

89

00

17

17

88

00

00

20

85

00

00

65

86

00

20

49

87

00

00

20

2

00

36

63

28

00

04

16

27

00

21

22

26

00

01

71

25

00

00

20

21

00

00

46

1-Nala

00

02

61

511-Nala

00

01

75

AHIR GANWA

402

00

03

95

Thana No:-162

401

00

09

60

400-Road

00

04

55

399

00

06

52

398

00

14

48

396

00

11

33

44

00

14

56

46

00

16

28

51

00

06

38

36

00

52

21

17

00

09

76

16

00

13

18

15

00

11

16

RAMPURWA

246

00

12

46

Thana No:-160

261

00

19

27

262

00

05

95

260

00

12

32

263

00

00

20

282

00

06

48

265

00

11

66

281

00

02

37

279

00

02

57

280

00

20

24

277

00

00

20

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4545

1

2

3

4

5

6

294

00

22

88

295

00

00

20

296

00

02

14

297

00

27

58

328

00

00

20

336-Road

00

06

58

337

00

02

51

7

00

20

77

6

00

00

20

9

00

07

48

8

00

05

49

10

00

01

95

11

00

00

20

12-Nala

00

04

05

GAY GHAT

213-Mekhwa Nadi

00

06

55

Thana No:-153

214-Mekhwa Nadi

00

07

24

215-Mekhwa Nadi

00

02

12

216

00

10

01

217

00

00

20

208

00

08

25

220

00

13

38

221

00

15

24

230

01

12

26

144-SH-54

00

03

19

265

00

00

20

262

00

02

59

143-Cart track

00

02

26

128

00

32

56

139

00

05

21

112

00

11

08

142

00

53

19

97

00

00

34

96

00

03

34

93

00

05

36

91

00

10

84

89

00

00

20

87

00

00

20

88

00

10

54

85

00

07

43

86

00

00

20

84

00

10

28

83

00

00

59

1

2

3

4

5

6

4546

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

81

00

07

94

82

00

00

66

267-Road

00

04

28

LOHIYAR UJAIN

(Road)

00

04

02

Thana No:-133

2745

00

08

06

2746

00

02

60

2747

00

13

55

2748

00

03

11

2753

00

01

12

2752

00

03

15

2761

00

19

63

2762

00

00

20

2764

00

05

73

2760

00

00

57

2759

00

02

82

2682-Road

00

01

89

2765

00

10

36

2768

00

08

97

2785

00

18

02

2767

00

06

73

2787

00

01

06

2786 (Road)

00

00

26

2678

00

06

73

2676

00

30

79

2677

00

02

63

2675

00

00

26

2654

00

14

50

2650

00

07

94

2656

00

06

23

2655

00

04

73

2644

00

13

91

2646

00

09

72

2647

00

19

08

2611

00

21

85

2607

00

04

76

2606

00

00

96

2605

00

09

84

2597

00

06

05

2598

00

00

20

2595

00

11

61

2596

00

10

15

2589

00

19

22

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4547

1

2

3

4

5

6

2588

00

00

20

2573

00

12

93

2572

00

17

21

3010

00

07

91

2574

00

01

53

2570

00

03

24

2568

00

07

83

2563

00

04

67

2564

00

00

20

2566

00

14

29

2567

00

00

52

2553

00

51

55

2554

00

10

34

1764

00

00

20

1765

00

00

66

1727

00

00

20

1762

00

18

84

1729

00

05

87

1730

00

07

46

1725

00

21

27

1724

00

02

66

1721

00

34

09

1622-Road

00

03

38

1709

00

00

20

1708

00

00

20

1623-Nala

00

06

73

1545

00

39

54

1544

00

00

20

1543

00

07

15

1546

00

05

74

1542

00

25

78

1541

00

08

91

1540

00

00

20

1522(Dhanauti River)

00

12

17

JAISINHPUR Thana No:-85

4291

00

07

14

4292

00

04

23

4289

00

03

96

4250-Road

00

03

82

4286

00

08

30

4283

00

03

82

4284

00

01

42

4282

00

07

15

1

2

3

4

5

6

4548

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

4272

00

04

34

4281

00

11

64

4280

00

12

95

4278

00

09

30

4277

00

07

58

4298

00

09

37

4305

00

00

20

4299

00

10

61

4300

00

02

15

4301

00

00

20

4538-Cart track

00

28

10

4541

00

03

05

4540

00

01

15

4539

00

00

20

4537

00

06

41

4536

00

02

67

4502-Road

00

03

60

4464

00

17

45

4489

00

08

20

4490

00

00

20

4488

00

13

68

4467

00

00

20

4483

00

05

05

4480

00

03

68

4482

00

00

97

4472

00

00

20

4481

00

02

15

4473

00

05

60

4437

00

01

77

4474

00

12

22

4477

00

15

42

4418

00

00

20

4505

00

00

20

4475

00

00

20

4476

00

00

20

4436

00

00

20

4435

00

15

08

4427

00

26

87

4425

00

04

20

4426

00

09

60

4424

00

13

77

4445

00

00

40

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4549

1

2

3

4

5

6

4381

00

20

75

4392

00

00

20

4391

00

00

45

4382

00

00

62

4383

00

00

20

4390

00

13

64

4389-6841

00

01

89

4389

00

10

57

4388

00

00

75

4013-Road

00

04

97

4015

00

22

21

4020

00

00

20

4019

00

19

67

4021

00

00

68

4022

00

22

69

4023

00

11

77

3968

00

00

39

3964 -Road

00

05

71

2744

00

07

10

2743

00

00

32

2745

00

17

66

2747

00

27

00

2746

00

00

20

2739

00

00

20

2748

00

17

63

2749

00

00

20

2727

00

03

30

2738

00

00

94

2728

00

04

11

2729

00

09

09

2731

00

09

73

2732

00

07

41

2730

00

05

17

2532-Road

00

04

69

2523

00

11

42

2524

00

08

74

2525

00

06

33

2526

00

02

11

2501

00

01

28

2502

00

00

20

2500

00

09

14

2499

00

05

57

1

2

3

4

5

6

4550

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2498

00

08

50

2432

00

15

71

2433

00

00

20

2449

00

07

09

2431

00

14

01

2450

00

06

74

2451

00

08

71

2454

00

00

20

2453

00

00

20

2430

00

00

66

2387

00

31

89

2461/6829

00

04

99

2462

00

00

20

2463

00

00

80

2386

00

01

63

2368-Road

00

05

71

2385

00

00

20

2366

00

01

21

2367

00

06

95

2365

00

00

20

2360

00

28

27

2364

00

01

20

2361

00

00

40

2363

00

00

20

2359

00

00

89

2358

00

00

31

489

00

16

06

490

00

01

01

484

00

04

81

491

00

07

36

492

00

09

09

493

00

02

56

495

00

19

16

518

00

09

60

523

00

03

99

522

00

05

97

526

00

06

36

525

00

00

20

535

00

03

73

527

00

02

92

528

00

01

06

530

00

01

82

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4551

1

2

3

4

5

6

529

00

01

04

532

00

01

48

531

00

01

91

533

00

05

02

534

00

08

60

177

00

00

20

171

00

02

00

170

00

06

59

169

00

08

12

172

00

00

61

173

00

05

13

174

00

00

20

175

00

08

58

164

00

02

89

165

00

05

37

159

00

05

86

160

00

01

52

142

00

09

81

143

00

00

20

144

00

02

03

146

00

02

74

145

00

04

88

147

00

07

17

148

00

03

74

155

00

00

20

154

00

01

68

151

00

08

38

152

00

00

20

110

00

10

08

91

00

00

56

92

00

00

20

109

00

07

07

108

00

10

01

107

00

04

82

106

00

00

72

104

00

06

18

99

00

07

95

93

00

00

20

100

00

02

01

53-Nala

00

01

54

51

00

10

75

52

00

00

20

1

2

3

4

5

6

4552

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

39-Road

00

04

70

38

00

10

03

37

00

06

02

36

00

07

66

32

00

06

81

30

00

01

85

33

00

06

40

25

00

15

72

24

00

00

20

23

00

07

47

722

00

00

20

723

00

07

51

730

00

08

26

731

00

00

20

16

00

06

29

9

00

04

70

741

00

08

73

743

00

00

20

740

00

11

36

744

00

01

76

749

00

07

11

748

00

00

20

763

00

09

93

762

00

09

93

752

00

00

52

753

00

06

29

761

00

01

62

754

00

04

77

760

00

02

02

759

00

04

80

755

00

00

96

758

00

06

33

757

00

11

16

767

00

00

20

769

00

00

94

768

00

10

94

BELWA RAY TOLA BAIRAGI

292

00

07

65

Thana No:-72

291

00

03

05

290

00

03

65

288

00

05

27

291/1824

00

00

20

287

00

06

79

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4553

1

2

3

4

5

6

286/1826

00

02

78

285

00

05

51

286

00

00

20

284

00

14

94

284/1831

00

04

29

282

00

00

34

281

00

03

08

272

00

00

20

280

00

17

94

279

00

00

20

276

00

08

75

274

00

00

20

275

00

03

48

277

00

02

69

225(Road)

00

10

04

218

00

07

25

217

00

05

71

20

00

31

08

216

00

02

03

21

00

10

02

15

00

13

13

14

00

00

20

19

00

01

06

16

00

09

59

17

00

00

20

18

00

00

20

13

00

08

61

11

00

04

33

10

00

02

48

8

00

08

54

9

00

00

20

4

00

21

68

3

00

00

20

78(Cart track)

00

02

42

1

00

00

20

BELWA RAY TOLA

263

00

17

05

NARIARWA

265

00

00

20

Thana No:-71

262

00

00

20

268

00

01

86

267

00

05

22

269

00

03

19

271

00

00

27

1

2

3

4

5

6

4554

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

270

00

13

86

275

00

00

92

276

00

06

47

285-CANAL

00

05

05

284

00

11

21

282

00

00

30

247

00

12

36

248

00

00

20

245

00

00

64

244

00

00

20

243/1653

00

07

14

243

00

04

79

240

00

00

20

242

00

06

46

241

00

00

63

231

00

07

38

229

00

00

20

230

00

07

20

210

00

04

72

209

00

17

72

208

00

04

39

CHHAPRA BHAS

8120

00

02

73

Thana No:-56

8121

00

03

52

8122

00

00

20

8119

00

08

93

8116

00

05

23

8117

00

04

80

8114

00

00

20

8113

00

07

02

8115

00

05

17

8112

00

10

31

8110

00

00

20

8111

00

00

92

8109

00

06

51

7942

00

00

20

7943

00

00

20

7944

00

00

20

8106

00

05

13

8105

00

04

19

8107

00

00

94

8108

00

00

20

8104/8162

00

02

33

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4555

1

2

3

4

5

6

8104

00

05

11

8103

00

03

44

8101

00

00

20

8102

00

12

51

8097

00

00

20

8098

00

23

85

7969

00

00

20

8096

00

00

20

8095

00

07

40

8094

00

00

77

8093

00

08

45

7980

00

07

53

8091

00

01

17

8092

00

00

20

8089

00

29

20

8088 (Road)

00

05

09

8087

00

05

44

8085

00

00

20

8086 (Canal)

00

03

10

8084

00

18

49

8083

00

12

47

8081

00

02

06

8082

00

05

18

8080

00

05

31

8079

00

13

57

8077

00

09

61

8078

00

00

20

8063

00

07

90

8075

00

08

65

8074

00

05

87

8065

00

00

20

8066

00

07

43

8073

00

09

58

8072

00

00

20

8067

00

03

69

8059

00

03

29

8056

00

04

25

8048

00

05

20

8047

00

03

45

8042

00

04

43

8039

00

04

34

8041

00

00

57

1

2

3

4

5

6

4556

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

8038

00

05

04

8040

00

01

07

6436

00

00

69

8037

00

08

46

8036

00

00

20

6437

00

04

65

8035

00

00

47

6442

00

01

55

6443

00

00

20

8032

00

07

95

8031

00

05

32

8028

00

07

27

8027

00

03

35

6445

00

05

27

8026

00

00

20

7516

00

05

59

7513

00

03

79

7517

00

09

93

7519

00

00

82

7520

00

00

20

7535

00

00

20

7524

00

06

29

7521

00

00

20

7523

00

01

94

7522

00

01

84

7507

00

08

96

7500

00

14

25

7501

00

00

20

7499

00

00

20

7498

00

00

40

7497

00

22

42

7380

00

00

20

7496

00

01

88

7492

00

01

74

7493

00

05

87

7489

00

00

20

7490

00

05

61

7488

00

10

63

7486

00

07

27

7484

00

00

79

7491

00

12

02

7483

00

00

20

7386

00

00

20

7479

00

00

52

7478

00

10

02

7475

00

00

37

7476

00

02

43

7477

00

02

93

7463

00

03

45

7464

00

00

20

7461

00

09

20

7462

00

08

30

7447(Road)

00

04

18

6501

00

27

75

6502

00

06

60

6503

00

11

78

5971

00

00

69

5970

00

00

98

5969

00

05

85

5964

00

01

19

5965

00

07

17

5967

00

03

17

5966

00

02

76

5940

00

17

73

5939

00

03

93

5929

00

07

93

5938

00

01

88

5930

00

16

42

5924

00

02

53

5918

00

07

16

5919

00

00

20

5932

00

00

20

5917

00

06

94

5916

00

05

98

5898

00

00

20

5900

00

00

20

5901

00

31

61

5905

00

00

20

5906

00

03

08

[F. No. R-25011/17/2013-OR-I]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4557

1

2

3

4

5

6

ubZ fnYyh] 5 vxLr] 2013

dk-vk- 1631-—dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slk izrhr gksrk gS fd yksd fgr esa ;g vko”;d gS fd iVuk ls eksfrgkjh vkSj csrkyiqj

rd isVªksfy;e inkFkksZ ds ifjogu gsrq ftyk iqcZ paikju] jkT; fcgkj esa bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs”ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkuh

pkfg, A

vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slh ikbiykbu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, vko”;d izrhr gksrk gS fd ml Hkwfe esa ftlds Hkhrj

mDr ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkus dk izLrko gS vkSj tks bl vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa of.kZr gS] mi;ksx dk vtZu fd;k tk,(

vr% vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbUl ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½ vf/kfu;e] 1962 ¼1962

dk 50½ dh /kkjk 3 dh mi&/kkjk¼1½ }kjk iznÙk “kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] mDr Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/akdkj dk vtZu djus ds vius

vk”k; dh ?kks’k.kk djrh gSA

dksbZ O;fDr] tks mDr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa fgrc) gS] ml rkjh[k ls ftldks] Hkkjr ds jkti= esa ;Fkk izdkf”kr

bl vf/klwpuk dh izfr;ka lk/kkj.k turk dks miyC/k djk nh tkrh gS] bDdhl fnu ds vUnj] Hkwfe ds Hkhrj ikbiykbu fcNk, tkus

gsrq mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj ds vtZu ds fy,] Jh v:.k dqekj >k] fc-iz-ls- o l{ke izkf/kdkjh bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs”ku fyfeVsM]

¼ikbiykbu fMohtu½ iVuk] iks-vks- <syok] flikjk] ftyk iVuk] fiu% 800020] fcgkj dks fyf[kr :i eas vk{ksi Hkst ldsxkA

vuqlwph

ftyk iwoZ paikju

jkT; % fcgkj

ekStk@xzke

losZ@Cykd@la- (IyksV la-)

lc&Mho&la-

{ks=kiQy

gsDVs;j

vkjs

oxZ ehVj

1

2

3

4

5

6

fcljkeiqj

700 unh

00

17

87

nqcSfy;k

696

00

20

59

Fkkuk uacj&206

695

00

44

43

674

00

01

50

702

00

00

57

673

01

59

59

697

00

05

57

698

00

11

39

665

01

69

45

672

00

09

91

634

00

12

63

633

00

00

20

472

00

02

36

471

00

00

20

473

00

01

93

721

00

01

86

719

00

03

97

474

00

09

37

750 ,EcsdEksUV

00

01

84

4558

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4559

fcljkeiqj

489

00

00

20

nqcSfy;k

488

00

07

05

Fkkuk uacj&206

487

00

03

25

490

00

17

71

440

00

26

05

443

00

00

20

439

00

06

97

438

00

08

69

437

00

05

77

402

00

00

20

413 dPpk jkLrk

00

04

63

426

00

00

20

425

00

00

20

401

00

00

20

403

00

03

63

434

00

00

90

406

00

18

17

409

00

03

71

408

00

00

20

410

00

00

40

361

00

23

96

362

00

00

54

363

00

00

20

360

00

00

20

334 jkLrk

00

01

42

gqlsuh

5950

00

07

43

Fkkuk uacj&245

5951

00

02

89

5952

00

05

13

5953

00

09

84

5954

00

08

52

5945

00

00

20

5944

00

00

20

5943

00

00

93

5956

00

01

99

5957

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4560

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

gqlsuh

5942

00

05

45

Fkkuk uacj&245

5941

00

03

58

5940

00

04

52

5937

00

00

20

5938

00

01

15

5939

00

03

52

5933

00

00

20

5915 dPpk jkLrk

00

01

69

5934

00

01

83

5935

00

03

52

6039

00

00

20

6040

00

14

45

6038

00

00

20

5914jkLrk

00

01

68

5913jkLrk

00

01

96

5912jkLrk

00

01

42

3113

00

08

42

3112

00

04

11

3106

00

00

20

3105

00

08

72

3108

00

09

57

3104

00

00

20

3103

00

00

47

3102

00

03

09

3109

00

03

30

3101

00

05

27

3100

00

00

20

3072

00

07

35

3073

00

04

44

3074

00

04

63

3075

00

04

84

3076

00

00

20

3088

00

04

02

3077

00

02

16

3078

00

05

00

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4561

gqlsuh

3079

00

04

31

Fkkuk uacj&245

3087

00

00

20

3080

00

04

11

3081

00

05

02

3082

00

13

01

3018

00

00

20

3083

00

00

20

2925

00

00

84

2992

00

00

48

2991

00

02

57

3082

00

13

01

2990

00

03

94

2989

00

05

08

2994

00

00

28

2988

00

02

30

2926

00

00

20

2987

00

02

71

2986

00

01

74

2985

00

02

78

2996

00

00

20

2984

00

01

53

2999

00

01

93

2976

00

07

86

2975

00

03

08

2974

00

02

19

2973

00

01

94

3002

00

00

20

2972

00

00

91

2971

00

04

57

2970

00

04

33

2967

00

01

79

2966

00

00

18

2965

00

00

20

2960dPpk jkLrk

00

01

77

666dPpk jkLrk

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4562

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

gqlsuh

667

00

00

20

Fkkuk uacj&245

2872

00

60

07

668dPpk jkLrk

00

01

23

2870

00

08

22

648jkLrk

00

03

40

756

00

01

87

735

00

00

20

757

00

01

43

758

00

00

20

755

00

07

47

753

00

00

65

752

00

00

20

754

00

03

85

771

00

01

22

772

00

03

01

773

00

00

20

750

00

14

59

749

00

04

72

775

00

03

63

440

00

01

88

445

00

00

20

441

00

00

20

439

00

04

97

437

00

00

47

438

00

09

59

436

00

01

80

425

00

08

55

435

00

00

20

424

00

00

78

430

00

01

57

427

00

02

71

426

00

00

20

418

00

01

73

417

00

00

55

428

00

07

66

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4563

gqlsuh

429

00

00

20

Fkkuk uacj&245

320

00

04

44

321

00

00

20

319

00

07

41

801

00

00

20

318

00

02

36

316

00

00

20

803

00

14

91

802

00

00

51

804

00

02

02

811

00

02

11

810

00

04

37

805

00

00

20

806

00

00

20

809

00

07

17

292jkLrk

00

01

08

291jkLrk

00

01

13

290jkLrk

00

01

03

818

00

05

47

817

00

00

20

819

00

10

43

288 ukyk

00

10

47

244

00

01

57

233

00

07

78

232

00

12

28

235

00

00

20

231

00

09

96

230

00

05

71

226

00

06

97

222

00

00

20

223

00

02

51

224

00

09

88

225

00

00

20

213

00

02

06

212

00

09

56

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4564

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

gqlsuh

210

00

00

20

Fkkuk uacj&245

1158jkLrk

00

03

92

1013

00

01

99

1014

00

10

76

1015

00

06

29

1016

00

19

56

1020

00

00

20

1022

00

00

81

1023

00

08

64

1025

00

03

64

1026

00

00

20

1024

00

09

45

1032

00

09

92

1031

00

00

20

1033

00

00

20

1040

00

00

20

1039

00

01

10

1038

00

13

31

1037

00

07

55

1113

00

00

20

1036

00

07

04

1114

00

00

30

1115

00

05

24

1121

00

00

20

1119

00

05

27

1120

00

09

52

1118

00

00

20

1129

00

00

20

1128

00

07

23

1130

00

18

74

1157dPpk jkLrk

00

02

28

1155

00

03

21

1154

00

00

20

1156

00

04

39

1158 jkLrk

00

03

12

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4565

1417

00

08

28

1418

00

00

20

1419

00

00

20

1411

00

18

68

1412

00

00

63

1413

00

00

20

1410

00

00

20

1409

00

14

14

1431

00

04

46

1408

00

03

43

1407

00

00

20

1433

00

20

07

1400

00

00

20

1399

00

02

51

1398

00

00

20

1434dPpk jkLrk

00

04

39

1441

00

27

97

1439

00

00

32

jkeiqj [ktqfj;k

3140

00

00

20

Fkkuk uacj&35

3141

00

02

05

3142

00

04

98

3143

00

00

20

lsEHkqvkiqj

1424

00

17

07

Fkkuk uacj&36

1347

00

00

20

1346

00

02

83

1345

00

10

15

1344

00

10

84

1342

00

04

17

1294

00

01

51

1215

00

00

57

1216

00

01

16

1213

00

13

75

1217

00

08

61

1219

00

04

92

1264

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4566

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

lsEHkqvkiqj

1220

00

19

67

Fkkuk uacj&36

1262

00

00

20

1261

00

01

85

1260

00

02

86

1259

00

05

16

1256

00

00

20

1258

00

03

84

1257

00

04

96

1252

00

01

80

1232

00

06

79

1233

00

05

98

1245

00

04

83

1246

00

01

38

1244

00

04

53

1247

00

00

20

1243

00

06

51

1242

00

02

98

1241

00

00

20

1497

00

02

10

1510

00

00

20

1506

00

19

46

1507

00

04

63

1505

00

00

21

1727

00

11

05

1730

00

26

85

1733

00

17

85

1734

00

01

78

1732

00

47

55

1735

00

00

62

1736

00

05

36

1737

00

08

84

1739

00

06

74

779

00

00

49

1740

00

07

90

1743

00

01

68

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4567

1742

00

06

88

762

00

00

84

1744

00

08

34

1763

00

01

46

1749

00

04

38

1750

00

06

29

1751

00

00

20

1752

00

00

90

1753

00

03

05

1754

00

02

71

1755

00

02

72

1756

00

02

04

1757

00

03

96

1758

00

01

02

1760

00

00

20

1759

00

06

17

cjgkjok [kqnZ

1295

00

09

02

Fkkuk uacj&34

1296

00

00

20

1294

00

05

89

1289

00

00

86

1291

00

01

42

1292

00

07

41

1293

00

06

80

1285

00

00

68

1284

00

05

50

1280

00

07

99

1185

00

00

27

1232

00

00

20

1279

00

08

63

1278

00

00

20

1234

00

08

20

1277

00

03

38

1275

00

03

68

1276

00

00

99

1274

00

03

34

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4568

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1273

00

18

04

1236

00

01

44

1237

00

00

20

1239

00

04

17

1240

00

00

20

1272

00

02

87

1271

00

03

18

1242

00

10

84

1269

00

01

96

1245

00

05

39

1246

00

05

27

1247

00

03

30

1248

00

03

31

1249

00

06

32

1250

00

04

76

1251

00

00

31

1252

00

00

20

1254

00

00

20

1253

00

05

36

1256

00

04

47

1255

00

00

54

1260

00

07

88

1264@1659

00

09

91

1264

00

06

13

991

00

00

82

ljksrkj

8743 dPpk jkLrk

00

01

33

Fkkuk uacj&33

8740

00

09

59

8742

00

00

45

8741

00

03

42

8736

00

02

56

8737

00

00

70

8738

00

01

95

8739

00

00

20

8735

00

01

88

8734

00

03

04

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4569

8732

00

02

57

8731

00

12

03

8730

00

00

20

8727

00

07

79

8724

00

00

20

8726

00

07

33

8415

00

00

20

8725

00

07

42

8714

00

04

00

8417

00

00

20

8418

00

06

59

8712

00

05

39

8420

00

09

99

8119

00

00

20

8422

00

07

47

8421

00

01

51

8118

00

00

20

8425

00

00

61

8426

00

03

52

8427

00

05

77

8431 jkLrk

00

00

20

7971

00

00

20

7970

00

01

96

7969

00

04

00

7968

00

00

20

7945

00

10

82

7943

00

00

20

7946

00

03

51

7942

00

01

58

7947

00

02

32

7941

00

02

85

7948

00

02

70

7961

00

03

48

7949

00

01

24

7950

00

00

98

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4570

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

7953

00

00

20

7952

00

03

71

7951

00

03

45

7954

00

04

19

7955

00

06

10

7956

00

03

01

7931

00

03

94

7906

00

00

28

7907

00

00

20

7930

00

02

07

7929

00

02

63

7908

00

00

20

7928

00

05

42

7925

00

03

17

7922

00

03

76

7921

00

01

78

7909

00

00

20

7911

00

03

10

7919

00

01

59

7913

00

00

20

7912

00

07

64

7897

00

03

39

7900

00

02

34

7898

00

00

40

7899

00

05

74

7980

00

00

26

7894

00

01

29

4774

00

01

58

7880

00

00

20

8000

00

06

92

7999

00

00

20

8001

00

02

02

8002

00

05

57

8017

00

00

20

8018

00

08

49

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4571

8023

00

10

81

8022

00

00

20

4607

00

05

84

4608

00

15

12

4606

00

00

20

4619

00

00

20

1313

00

00

48

1311

00

04

77

4620

00

00

20

1312

00

03

45

1310

00

00

39

1308

00

13

29

1307

00

00

32

1306

00

00

20

1305

00

09

53

1304

00

00

20

1303

00

07

94

1301

00

00

20

1300

00

00

20

1298

00

10

85

1297

00

00

20

1299

00

04

87

1296

00

05

23

4675

00

15

46

1295

00

00

20

4677

00

03

76

4678

00

02

64

4679

00

01

69

1294

00

00

52

4680

00

16

72

1138

00

04

08

931

00

09

33

934

00

00

20

925

00

02

52

933

00

13

23

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4572

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

936

00

00

20

937

00

00

38

924

00

32

71

916

00

00

31

949

00

03

67

990

00

02

18

991

00

07

04

998

00

05

87

999

00

03

15

997

00

00

20

1000

00

04

17

1001

00

02

93

1008

00

03

61

1003

00

03

08

1007

00

07

71

1006

00

01

39

1015

00

00

20

1006@9336

00

06

73

1016

00

01

31

1027

00

03

38

1026

00

04

48

1028

00

00

20

1025

00

03

58

1017

00

00

20

1019

00

09

27

1023

00

00

20

1021

00

00

52

1020

00

06

83

576

00

03

68

575

00

05

73

574

00

00

20

515

00

04

11

516

00

07

47

512

00

00

20

518

00

01

58

519

00

05

85

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4573

520

00

04

67

488

00

03

95

489

00

06

06

487

00

00

20

486

00

13

05

485

00

00

60

484

00

05

99

480

00

10

64

458

00

00

20

459

00

06

93

467

00

00

20

460

00

00

20

464

00

00

89

463

00

12

10

462

00

01

39

97 jkLrk

00

03

15

1670

00

05

11

1668

00

06

42

1667

00

00

20

1672

00

03

64

1673

00

09

76

1674

00

02

37

1741

00

02

39

1740

00

06

78

1739

00

04

79

1745

00

00

65

1738

00

09

86

1746

00

00

71

1737

00

06

79

1736

00

00

20

1730

00

10

25

1765

00

00

20

1766

00

09

06

1729

00

03

76

1767

00

04

72

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4574

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1768

00

09

26

1760

00

00

20

1759

00

07

49

1758

00

01

31

1810

00

04

56

1810@9339

00

04

26

1809

00

13

97

1808

00

06

57

1807

00

00

20

1806

00

02

23

1806@9329

00

10

38

1804

00

00

20

1803

00

21

80

1802

00

02

67

1864

00

12

67

1865

00

00

65

1862

00

06

62

1880

00

15

53

1882

00

02

52

1883

00

11

43

1884

00

00

20

1886

00

02

98

1885

00

18

75

1888

00

15

54

1891

00

01

07

1939

00

14

89

1925

00

00

53

1926

00

02

38

1927

00

02

91

1928

00

02

90

1929

00

03

65

1930

00

03

36

1933

00

02

67

1931

00

03

20

1932

00

01

04

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4575

1935

00

17

43

1922

00

09

90

1921

00

00

20

42

00

06

25

37

00

00

20

41

00

32

04

39

00

00

46

40

00

08

91

15

00

05

98

14

00

00

20

¹iQk- la- vkj&25011@17@2013&vksvkj&Iº

iou oqQekj] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 5th August, 2013

S.O. 1631.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest

that a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited in Dist. East Champaran in the State of Bihar

for ‘Patna to Motihari and Baitalpur Pipeline’ for the transportation of Petroleum Product;

And, whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is

necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which

is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and

Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby

declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the

date on which the copies of the notification issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as

published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of

the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land, to Shri Arun Kumar Jha B.A.S. & Competent

Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited. (Pipelines Division) P.O. Dhelwan, Sipara, Dist. Patna (Bihar.) Pin –

800020.

SCHEDULE

Dist.: Purba Champaran

State : Bihar

Mouja / Village

Survey/BlockNo.

Sub-Div-No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

BISHRAMPUR DUBAULIYA

700(river)

00

17

87

Thana No:-206

696

00

20

59

695

00

44

43

674

00

01

50

702

00

00

57

673

01

59

59

697

00

05

57

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4576

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

698

00

11

39

665

01

69

45

672

00

09

91

634

00

12

63

633

00

00

20

472

00

02

36

471

00

00

20

473

00

01

93

721

00

01

86

719

00

03

97

474

00

09

37

750

00

01

84

489

00

00

20

488

00

07

05

487

00

03

25

490

00

17

71

440

00

26

05

443

00

00

20

439

00

06

97

438

00

08

69

437

00

05

77

402

00

00

20

413 (CART TRACK)

00

04

63

426

00

00

20

425

00

00

20

401

00

00

20

403

00

03

63

434

00

00

90

406

00

18

17

409

00

03

71

408

00

00

20

410

00

00

40

361

00

23

96

362

00

00

54

363

00

00

20

360

00

00

20

334(ROAD)

00

01

42

HUSENI

5950

00

07

43

Thana No:-245

5951

00

02

89

5952

00

05

13

5953

00

09

84

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4577

5954

00

08

52

5945

00

00

20

5944

00

00

20

5943

00

00

93

5956

00

01

99

5957

00

00

20

5942

00

05

45

5941

00

03

58

5940

00

04

52

5937

00

00

20

5938

00

01

15

5939

00

03

52

5933

00

00

20

5915 (Cart track)

00

01

69

5934

00

01

83

5935

00

03

52

6039

00

00

20

6040

00

14

45

6038

00

00

20

5914(Road)

00

01

68

5913(Road)

00

01

96

5912(Road)

00

01

42

3113

00

08

42

3112

00

04

11

3106

00

00

20

3105

00

08

72

3108

00

09

57

3104

00

00

20

3103

00

00

47

3102

00

03

09

3109

00

03

30

3101

00

05

27

3100

00

00

20

3072

00

07

35

3073

00

04

44

3074

00

04

63

3075

00

04

84

3076

00

00

20

3088

00

04

02

3077

00

02

16

3078

00

05

00

3079

00

04

31

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4578

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

3087

00

00

20

3080

00

04

11

3081

00

05

02

3082

00

13

01

3018

00

00

20

3083

00

00

20

2925

00

00

84

2992

00

00

48

2991

00

02

57

2990

00

03

94

2989

00

05

08

2994

00

00

28

2988

00

02

30

2926

00

00

20

2987

00

02

71

2986

00

01

74

2985

00

02

78

2996

00

00

20

2984

00

01

53

2999

00

01

93

2976

00

07

86

2975

00

03

08

2974

00

02

19

2973

00

01

94

3002

00

00

20

2972

00

00

91

2971

00

04

57

2970

00

04

33

2967

00

01

79

2966

00

00

18

2965

00

00

20

2960(Cart track)

00

01

77

666(Cart track)

00

00

20

667

00

00

20

2872

00

60

07

668(Cart track)

00

01

23

2870

00

08

22

648(Road)

00

03

40

756

00

01

87

735

00

00

20

757

00

01

43

758

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4579

755

00

07

47

753

00

00

65

752

00

00

20

754

00

03

85

771

00

01

22

772

00

03

01

773

00

00

20

750

00

14

59

749

00

04

72

775

00

03

63

440

00

01

88

445

00

00

20

441

00

00

20

439

00

04

97

437

00

00

47

438

00

09

59

436

00

01

80

425

00

08

55

435

00

00

20

424

00

00

78

430

00

01

57

427

00

02

71

426

00

00

20

418

00

01

73

417

00

00

55

428

00

07

66

429

00

00

20

320

00

04

44

321

00

00

20

319

00

07

41

801

00

00

20

318

00

02

36

316

00

00

20

803

00

14

91

802

00

00

51

804

00

02

02

811

00

02

11

810

00

04

37

805

00

00

20

806

00

00

20

809

00

07

17

292(Road)

00

01

08

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4580

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

291(Road)

00

01

13

290(Road)

00

01

03

818

00

05

47

817

00

00

20

819

00

10

43

288(Nala)

00

10

47

244

00

01

57

233

00

07

78

232

00

12

28

235

00

00

20

231

00

09

96

230

00

05

71

226

00

06

97

222

00

00

20

223

00

02

51

224

00

09

88

225

00

00

20

213

00

02

06

212

00

09

56

210

00

00

20

1158(Road)

00

03

92

1013

00

01

99

1014

00

10

76

1015

00

06

29

1016

00

19

56

1020

00

00

20

1022

00

00

81

1023

00

08

64

1025

00

03

64

1026

00

00

20

1024

00

09

45

1032

00

09

92

1031

00

00

20

1033

00

00

20

1040

00

00

20

1039

00

01

10

1038

00

13

31

1037

00

07

55

1113

00

00

20

1036

00

07

04

1114

00

00

30

1115

00

05

24

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4581

1121

00

00

20

1119

00

05

27

1120

00

09

52

1118

00

00

20

1129

00

00

20

1128

00

07

23

1130

00

18

74

1157(Cart track)

00

02

28

1155

00

03

21

1154

00

00

20

1156

00

04

39

1158-Road

00

03

12

1417

00

08

28

1418

00

00

20

1419

00

00

20

1411

00

18

68

1412

00

00

63

1413

00

00

20

1410

00

00

20

1409

00

14

14

1431

00

04

46

1408

00

03

43

1407

00

00

20

1433

00

20

07

1400

00

00

20

1399

00

02

51

1398

00

00

20

1434(Cart track)

00

04

39

1441

00

27

97

1439

00

00

32

RAMPUR

3140

00

00

20

KHAJURIYA Thana No:-35

3141

00

02

05

3142

00

04

98

3143

00

00

20

SEMBHUAPUR

1424

00

17

07

Thana No:-36

1347

00

00

20

1346

00

02

83

1345

00

10

15

1344

00

10

84

1342

00

04

17

1294

00

01

51

1215

00

00

57

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4582

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1216

00

01

16

1213

00

13

75

1217

00

08

61

1219

00

04

92

1264

00

00

20

1220

00

19

67

1262

00

00

20

1261

00

01

85

1260

00

02

86

1259

00

05

16

1256

00

00

20

1258

00

03

84

1257

00

04

96

1252

00

01

80

1232

00

06

79

1233

00

05

98

1245

00

04

83

1246

00

01

38

1244

00

04

53

1247

00

00

20

1243

00

06

51

1242

00

02

98

1241

00

00

20

1497

00

02

10

1510

00

00

20

1506

00

19

46

1507

00

04

63

1505

00

00

21

1727

00

11

05

1730

00

26

85

1733

00

17

85

1734

00

01

78

1732

00

47

55

1735

00

00

62

1736

00

05

36

1737

00

08

84

1739

00

06

74

779

00

00

49

1740

00

07

90

1743

00

01

68

1742

00

06

88

762

00

00

84

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4583

1744

00

08

34

1763

00

01

46

1749

00

04

38

1750

00

06

29

1751

00

00

20

1752

00

00

90

1753

00

03

05

1754

00

02

71

1755

00

02

72

1756

00

02

04

1757

00

03

96

1758

00

01

02

1760

00

00

20

1759

00

06

17

BARHARWA KHURD

1295

00

09

02

Thana No:-34

1296

00

00

20

1294

00

05

89

1289

00

00

86

1291

00

01

42

1292

00

07

41

1293

00

06

80

1285

00

00

68

1284

00

05

50

1280

00

07

99

1185

00

00

27

1232

00

00

20

1279

00

08

63

1278

00

00

20

1234

00

08

20

1277

00

03

38

1275

00

03

68

1276

00

00

99

1274

00

03

34

1273

00

18

04

1236

00

01

44

1237

00

00

20

1239

00

04

17

1240

00

00

20

1272

00

02

87

1271

00

03

18

1242

00

10

84

1269

00

01

96

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4584

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1245

00

05

39

1246

00

05

27

1247

00

03

30

1248

00

03

31

1249

00

06

32

1250

00

04

76

1251

00

00

31

1252

00

00

20

1254

00

00

20

1253

00

05

36

1256

00

04

47

1255

00

00

54

1260

00

07

88

1264/1659

00

09

91

1264

00

06

13

991

00

00

82

SAROTAR

8743(Cart Track)

00

01

33

Thana No:-33

8740

00

09

59

8742

00

00

45

8741

00

03

42

8736

00

02

56

8737

00

00

70

8738

00

01

95

8739

00

00

20

8735

00

01

88

8734

00

03

04

8732

00

02

57

8731

00

12

03

8730

00

00

20

8727

00

07

79

8724

00

00

20

8726

00

07

33

8415

00

00

20

8725

00

07

42

8714

00

04

00

8417

00

00

20

8418

00

06

59

8712

00

05

39

8420

00

09

99

8119

00

00

20

8422

00

07

47

8421

00

01

51

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4585

8118

00

00

20

8425

00

00

61

8426

00

03

52

8427

00

05

77

8431-Road

00

00

20

7971

00

00

20

7970

00

01

96

7969

00

04

00

7968

00

00

20

7945

00

10

82

7943

00

00

20

7946

00

03

51

7942

00

01

58

7947

00

02

32

7941

00

02

85

7948

00

02

70

7961

00

03

48

7949

00

01

24

7950

00

00

98

7953

00

00

20

7952

00

03

71

7951

00

03

45

7954

00

04

19

7955

00

06

10

7956

00

03

01

7931

00

03

94

7906

00

00

28

7907

00

00

20

7930

00

02

07

7929

00

02

63

7908

00

00

20

7928

00

05

42

7925

00

03

17

7922

00

03

76

7921

00

01

78

7909

00

00

20

7911

00

03

10

7919

00

01

59

7913

00

00

20

7912

00

07

64

7897

00

03

39

7900

00

02

34

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4586

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

7898

00

00

40

7899

00

05

74

7980

00

00

26

7894

00

01

29

4774

00

01

58

7880

00

00

20

8000

00

06

92

7999

00

00

20

8001

00

02

02

8002

00

05

57

8017

00

00

20

8018

00

08

49

8023

00

10

81

8022

00

00

20

4607

00

05

84

4608

00

15

12

4606

00

00

20

4619

00

00

20

1313

00

00

48

1311

00

04

77

4620

00

00

20

1312

00

03

45

1310

00

00

39

1308

00

13

29

1307

00

00

32

1306

00

00

20

1305

00

09

53

1304

00

00

20

1303

00

07

94

1301

00

00

20

1300

00

00

20

1298

00

10

85

1297

00

00

20

1299

00

04

87

1296

00

05

23

4675

00

15

46

1295

00

00

20

4677

00

03

76

4678

00

02

64

4679

00

01

69

1294

00

00

52

4680

00

16

72

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4587

1138

00

04

08

931

00

09

33

934

00

00

20

925

00

02

52

933

00

13

23

936

00

00

20

937

00

00

38

924

00

32

71

916

00

00

31

949

00

03

67

990

00

02

18

991

00

07

04

998

00

05

87

999

00

03

15

997

00

00

20

1000

00

04

17

1001

00

02

93

1008

00

03

61

1003

00

03

08

1007

00

07

71

1006

00

01

39

1015

00

00

20

1006/9336

00

06

73

1016

00

01

31

1027

00

03

38

1026

00

04

48

1028

00

00

20

1025

00

03

58

1017

00

00

20

1019

00

09

27

1023

00

00

20

1021

00

00

52

1020

00

06

83

576

00

03

68

575

00

05

73

574

00

00

20

515

00

04

11

516

00

07

47

512

00

00

20

518

00

01

58

519

00

05

85

520

00

04

67

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4588

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

488

00

03

95

489

00

06

06

487

00

00

20

486

00

13

05

485

00

00

60

484

00

05

99

480

00

10

64

458

00

00

20

459

00

06

93

467

00

00

20

460

00

00

20

464

00

00

89

463

00

12

10

462

00

01

39

97-Road

00

03

15

1670

00

05

11

1668

00

06

42

1667

00

00

20

1672

00

03

64

1673

00

09

76

1674

00

02

37

1741

00

02

39

1740

00

06

78

1739

00

04

79

1745

00

00

65

1738

00

09

86

1746

00

00

71

1737

00

06

79

1736

00

00

20

1730

00

10

25

1765

00

00

20

1766

00

09

06

1729

00

03

76

1767

00

04

72

1768

00

09

26

1760

00

00

20

1759

00

07

49

1758

00

01

31

1810

00

04

56

1810/9339

00

04

26

1809

00

13

97

1808

00

06

57

1807

00

00

20

1806

00

02

23

1806/9329

00

10

38

1804

00

00

20

1803

00

21

80

1802

00

02

67

1864

00

12

67

1865

00

00

65

1862

00

06

62

1880

00

15

53

1882

00

02

52

1883

00

11

43

1884

00

00

20

1886

00

02

98

1885

00

18

75

1888

00

15

54

1891

00

01

07

1939

00

14

89

1925

00

00

53

1926

00

02

38

1927

00

02

91

1928

00

02

90

1929

00

03

65

1930

00

03

36

1933

00

02

67

1931

00

03

20

1932

00

01

04

1935

00

17

43

1922

00

09

90

1921

00

00

20

42

00

06

25

37

00

00

20

41

00

32

04

39

00

00

46

40

00

08

91

15

00

05

98

14

00

00

20

[F. No. R-25011/17/2013-OR-I]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4589

ubZ fnYyh] 5 vxLr] 2013

dk-vk-

1632-—dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slk izrhr gksrk gS fd yksd fgr esa ;g vko”;d gS fd iVuk ls eksfrgkjh vkSj csrkyiqj

rd isVªksfy;e inkFkks± ds ifjogu gsrq ftyk iwoZ paikju] jkT; fcgkj esa bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs”ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkuh

pkfg, A

vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slh ikbiykbu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, vko”;d izrhr gksrk gS fd ml Hkwfe esa ftlds Hkhrj

mDr ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkus dk izLrko gS vkSj tks bl vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa of.kZr gS] mi;ksx dk vtZu fd;k tk,(

vr% vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] iSVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbUl ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½ vf/kfu;e] 1962 ¼1962

dk 50½ dh /kkjk 3 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk iznÙk “kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] mDr Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/akdkj dk vtZu djus ds vius

vk”k; dh ?kks’k.kk djrh gSA

dksbZ O;fDr] tks mDr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa fgrc) gS] ml rkjh[k ls ftldks] Hkkjr ds jkti= esa ;Fkk&izdkf”kr bl

vf/klwpuk dh izfr;ka lk/kkj.k turk dks miyC/k djk nh tkrh gSa] bDdhl fnu ds vUnj] Hkwfe ds Hkhrj ikbiykbu fcNk, tkus gsrq

mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj ds vtZu ds fy,] Jh v:.k dqekj >k] fc-iz-ls- o l{ke izkf/kdkjh bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs”ku fyfeVsM ¼ikbiykbu

fMohtu½ iVuk] iks-vks- <syok] flikjk] ftyk iVuk] fiu % 800020] fcgkj dks fyf[kr :i eas vk{ksi Hkst ldsxkA

vuqlwph

ftyk % iwoZ paikju

jkT; % fcgkj

ekStk@xzke

losZ@Cykd@la- (IykWV la-)

lc&Mho&la-

{ks=kiQy

gsDVs;j

vkjs

oxZ ehVj

1

2

3

4

5

6

HkVkSyh;k

3749

00

30

75

Fkkuk uacj&193

3748

00

00

20

3750

00

10

55

3747

00

03

27

3746

00

00

20

3745

00

12

39

3744

00

00

20

ukSru

775

00

06

60

Fkkuk uacj&194

774

00

10

83

772

00

14

31

769

00

00

20

771

00

05

75

782

00

00

20

800

00

09

15

801

00

05

29

799

00

00

20

802

00

19

97

976

00

05

73

975

00

00

39

974

00

04

69

973

00

04

32

972

00

00

20

971

00

08

18

4590

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4591

969

00

02

97

970

00

05

09

964

00

01

63

963

00

07

77

962

00

09

49

848

00

04

99

849

00

01

47

850

00

03

65

847@1179

00

01

15

842

00

00

60

841

00

05

31

840

00

05

00

837

00

00

20

838

00

07

75

835

00

04

28

836

00

00

20

831

00

08

98

833

00

00

20

830

00

02

36

833@1195

00

01

51

832

00

05

47

427

00

00

20

426

00

05

75

436

00

07

53

435

00

00

67

438

00

18

14

439

00

00

20

440

00

05

94

442

00

13

04

441

00

00

55

422

00

20

98

417

00

00

20

418

00

01

29

419

00

00

20

421

00

13

83

420

00

00

58

493

00

10

71

494

00

00

80

495

00

10

81

496

00

00

31

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4592

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

365

00

00

47

364

00

02

77

363

00

03

40

497

00

00

36

498

00

00

20

355

00

11

39

356

00

00

20

354

00

01

76

353

00

09

56

345

00

02

03

346

00

02

85

347

00

06

16

340

00

14

14

341

00

00

20

342

00

01

74

338

00

11

87

337

00

06

40

339

00

08

21

317

00

02

65

316

00

00

20

cjok

1487

00

01

87

Fkkuk uacj&195

1488

00

00

20

1486

00

09

70

1456

00

29

94

1457

00

00

20

1458

00

00

93

1454

00

15

18

1453

00

00

20

1459

00

00

20

1455

00

00

20

1451jkLrk

00

02

43

1448

00

11

45

1449

00

04

92

1447

00

03

89

1445

00

00

85

1444

00

05

45

1443

00

00

20

1442

00

00

20

1441

00

03

09

1440

00

03

80

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4593

1439

00

01

64

1436

00

09

18

1419

00

01

80

1417

00

06

81

1416

00

00

20

1413

00

13

58

1414

00

00

20

1412

00

00

20

1386

00

02

04

1384

00

02

27

1387

00

07

26

1383

00

06

48

1380

00

05

87

1381

00

00

20

1378

00

00

20

1379

00

07

84

1356

00

00

20

1376

00

00

20

1358

00

07

08

1359

00

00

20

1360

00

05

33

1361

00

01

14

1374

00

01

53

1364

00

00

20

1362

00

07

01

1363

00

03

51

1341

00

01

59

1343

00

00

20

1339

00

13

29

1338

00

03

77

1337

00

00

20

1336

00

03

22

1335

00

03

27

1334

00

11

73

413 jkLrk

00

02

62

195

00

01

42

196

00

10

11

197

00

00

20

194

00

01

38

198

00

00

20

190

00

22

54

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4594

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

189

00

00

20

185

00

06

99

182

00

00

20

184

00

08

14

183

00

12

38

179

00

00

20

160

00

01

48

161

00

06

29

162

00

05

10

91

00

00

63

163

00

02

29

164

00

00

52

90

00

07

65

166

00

06

46

89

00

01

92

167

00

04

64

168

00

02

59

87

00

03

49

169

00

00

31

86

00

10

11

e/kqcuh

12553

00

00

83

Fkkuk uacj&176

12552

00

11

93

12551

00

00

51

12556

00

04

38

12549

00

01

08

12557

00

01

81

12562

00

00

25

12563

00

00

20

12564

00

00

20

12548

00

15

16

12547

00

00

63

12532

00

22

08

12533

00

00

20

12531

00

00

37

12527

00

00

20

12528

00

08

12

12529

00

03

59

12526

00

03

60

12525

00

01

91

12523

00

07

24

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4595

12519

00

08

96

12518

00

07

43

12516

00

00

20

12520

00

05

04

12716

00

01

33

12484

00

10

90

12718

00

00

20

12786

00

03

67

12785

00

06

72

12784

00

00

58

12783

00

09

41

12782

00

07

74

12757

00

00

20

12758

00

12

61

12759

00

00

20

12760

00

05

63

12755@15504

00

04

51

12761

00

09

44

12762

00

09

84

12764

00

00

20

12763

00

01

89

13460

00

10

57

13458

00

00

20

13459

00

05

43

13463

00

06

74

13465

00

09

87

13467

00

07

95

13470

00

00

99

13431

00

08

18

13430

00

06

01

13429

00

00

80

13428

00

04

64

13427

00

00

20

13415

00

10

00

13415@15550

00

00

20

13415@15552

00

07

89

13409

00

00

20

13416

00

03

89

13417

00

00

20

13408

00

09

74

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4596

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

13411

00

00

20

13407

00

06

39

13406

00

00

20

13504

00

04

02

13660

00

13

42

13661

00

01

23

13669

00

00

70

13668

00

10

34

13667

00

03

57

13666

00

02

33

13665

00

04

90

13692

00

00

20

13693

00

09

37

13694

00

06

17

13695

00

00

40

13687

00

00

20

13686

00

07

03

13702

00

00

20

13685

00

00

40

13731

00

06

48

13684

00

00

20

13733

00

01

77

13732

00

01

74

13734

00

04

35

13730

00

01

49

13735

00

08

20

13736

00

00

20

13737

00

01

51

14970

00

00

49

14969

00

06

57

14971

00

01

99

14968

00

05

96

14966

00

07

61

14967

00

00

20

14964

00

02

24

14965

00

06

21

14963

00

00

20

5761

00

00

78

5763

00

01

78

5762

00

08

65

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4597

5776

00

03

32

5764

00

08

16

5772@15469

00

03

83

5774

00

00

20

5773

00

02

79

5772

00

05

67

5771

00

04

82

5770

00

01

66

5775

00

04

90

5827

00

03

45

5826

00

09

16

5834

00

10

28

5832

00

00

20

5833

00

00

83

5840

00

09

53

5839

00

01

44

5841

00

07

11

5842

00

01

57

5843

00

06

51

5844

00

01

96

14907

00

00

20

14906

00

00

54

14902

00

04

53

14903

00

07

29

14904

00

03

09

13840

00

00

20

13841

00

15

86

14884

00

00

20

13842

00

00

82

13845

00

03

10

13844

00

01

66

13843

00

00

20

13846 jkLrk

00

02

37

14871 jkLrk

00

02

79

13884

00

00

77

14874

00

01

81

14858

00

03

10

14862

00

05

07

14861

00

06

68

14863

00

00

60

14860

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4598

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

14864

00

09

61

14869

00

00

20

14865

00

00

20

14868

00

03

90

14867

00

08

74

14866

00

07

90

6792

00

11

10

6795

00

00

20

6793

00

10

67

6794

00

00

45

6789 jkLrk

00

04

34

6787

00

03

48

6786

00

00

44

6788

00

10

52

6407

00

14

92

6411

00

14

78

6416

00

00

28

6418

00

05

06

6417

00

08

75

6421

00

00

20

6430

00

11

95

6429

00

05

78

6431

00

03

70

6428

00

00

32

6432

00

09

62

6427

00

07

23

6456

00

07

12

6457

00

03

02

6455

00

04

75

6458

00

08

26

6462

00

00

20

6461

00

00

91

6459

00

04

32

6460

00

03

66

6478

00

11

92

6505

00

02

31

6506

00

11

81

6507

00

14

47

6511

00

00

95

6508

00

00

96

6510

00

06

55

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4599

6509

00

04

78

6512

00

02

07

6524 jkLrk

00

04

07

6535

00

06

09

6534

00

04

50

6533

00

03

46

6532

00

01

71

6072

00

10

46

6073

00

00

20

6071

00

19

48

6079

00

00

20

6080

00

00

20

6082

00

03

15

6083

00

05

39

6070

00

00

40

6084

00

14

44

6068

00

19

91

6087

00

03

09

299

00

14

81

298

00

00

43

6089

00

00

20

296

00

00

97

297

00

14

76

6091

00

00

20

6092

00

01

15

295

00

02

02

291

00

00

20

290

00

13

60

289

00

00

32

282

00

06

05

287

00

00

20

286

00

00

20

285

00

00

20

284

00

00

46

283

00

04

83

272

00

02

77

278

00

01

32

273

00

02

03

274

00

02

20

275

00

02

17

276

00

02

23

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4600

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

265

00

08

52

264

00

13

13

232

00

00

20

254

00

00

20

259

00

14

15

258

00

05

69

256

00

01

90

257

00

03

93

250

00

00

97

249

00

05

08

248

00

10

52

247

00

02

13

246

00

00

20

8617

00

29

58

8618

00

20

29

8782

00

62

18

8783

00

00

29

8784

00

04

74

8785

00

00

20

8787

00

13

42

8788

00

60

06

8789 fQYM psuy

00

01

83

8790

00

35

92

8791

00

18

28

8792 ukyk

00

02

04

8847

00

06

49

8848 ukyk

00

04

58

8846

00

01

95

8849

00

06

47

8850

00

16

47

8851

00

00

87

47

00

05

41

46

00

00

20

48

00

07

30

49

00

04

30

50

00

00

20

51

00

00

20

52

00

09

67

53

00

09

43

54

00

03

55

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4601

59

00

14

13

60

00

12

01

63

00

11

44

64

00

07

41

65

00

09

88

66

00

14

98

67

00

00

20

93 ukyk

00

06

09

235

00

20

10

236

00

00

20

240

00

00

90

241

00

21

68

238

00

00

20

239

00

00

30

242

00

08

73

266 jkLrk

00

01

94

¹iQk- la- vkj&25011@17@2013&vksvkj&Iº

iou oqQekj] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 5th August, 2013

S.O. 1632.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest

that a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited in Dist. East Champaran in the State of Bihar

for ‘Patna to Motihari and Baitalpur Pipeline’ for the transportation of Petroleum Product;

And, whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is

necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which

is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and

Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby

declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the

date on which the copies of the notification issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as

published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of

the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land, to Shri Arun Kumar Jha, B.A.S. & Competent

Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited. (Pipelines Division) P.O. Dhelwan, Sipara, Dist. Patna (Bihar) Pin –

800020.

SCHEDULE

Dist.: Purba Champaran

State : Bihar

Mouja / Village

Survey/BlockNo.

Sub-Div-No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

BHATAULIYA

3749

00

30

75

Thana No.-193

3748

00

00

20

3750

00

10

55

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4602

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

3747

00

03

27

3746

00

00

20

3745

00

12

39

3744

00

00

20

NAUTAN

775

00

06

60

Thana No.-194

774

00

10

83

772

00

14

31

769

00

00

20

771

00

05

75

782

00

00

20

800

00

09

15

801

00

05

29

799

00

00

20

802

00

19

97

976

00

05

73

975

00

00

39

974

00

04

69

973

00

04

32

972

00

00

20

971

00

08

18

969

00

02

97

970

00

05

09

964

00

01

63

963

00

07

77

962

00

09

49

848

00

04

99

849

00

01

47

850

00

03

65

847/1179

00

01

15

842

00

00

60

841

00

05

31

840

00

05

00

837

00

00

20

838

00

07

75

835

00

04

28

836

00

00

20

831

00

08

98

833

00

00

20

830

00

02

36

833/1195

00

01

51

832

00

05

47

427

00

00

20

426

00

05

75

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4603

436

00

07

53

435

00

00

67

438

00

18

14

439

00

00

20

440

00

05

94

442

00

13

04

441

00

00

55

422

00

20

98

417

00

00

20

418

00

01

29

419

00

00

20

421

00

13

83

420

00

00

58

493

00

10

71

494

00

00

80

495

00

10

81

496

00

00

31

365

00

00

47

364

00

02

77

363

00

03

40

497

00

00

36

498

00

00

20

355

00

11

39

356

00

00

20

354

00

01

76

353

00

09

56

345

00

02

03

346

00

02

85

347

00

06

16

340

00

14

14

341

00

00

20

342

00

01

74

338

00

11

87

337

00

06

40

339

00

08

21

317

00

02

65

316

00

00

20

BARWA

1487

00

01

87

Thana No.-195

1488

00

00

20

1486

00

09

70

1456

00

29

94

1457

00

00

20

1458

00

00

93

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4604

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1454

00

15

18

1453

00

00

20

1459

00

00

20

1455

00

00

20

1451 (ROAD)

00

02

43

1448

00

11

45

1449

00

04

92

1447

00

03

89

1445

00

00

85

1444

00

05

45

1443

00

00

20

1442

00

00

20

1441

00

03

09

1440

00

03

80

1439

00

01

64

1436

00

09

18

1419

00

01

80

1417

00

06

81

1416

00

00

20

1413

00

13

58

1414

00

00

20

1412

00

00

20

1386

00

02

04

1384

00

02

27

1387

00

07

26

1383

00

06

48

1380

00

05

87

1381

00

00

20

1378

00

00

20

1379

00

07

84

1356

00

00

20

1376

00

00

20

1358

00

07

08

1359

00

00

20

1360

00

05

33

1361

00

01

14

1374

00

01

53

1364

00

00

20

1362

00

07

01

1363

00

03

51

1341

00

01

59

1343

00

00

20

1339

00

13

29

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4605

1338

00

03

77

1337

00

00

20

1336

00

03

22

1335

00

03

27

1334

00

11

73

413 (ROAD)

00

02

62

195

00

01

42

196

00

10

11

197

00

00

20

194

00

01

38

198

00

00

20

190

00

22

54

189

00

00

20

185

00

06

99

182

00

00

20

184

00

08

14

183

00

12

38

179

00

00

20

160

00

01

48

161

00

06

29

162

00

05

10

91

00

00

63

163

00

02

29

164

00

00

52

90

00

07

65

166

00

06

46

89

00

01

92

167

00

04

64

168

00

02

59

87

00

03

49

169

00

00

31

86

00

10

11

MADHUBANI

12553

00

00

83

Thana No.-176

12552

00

11

93

12551

00

00

51

12556

00

04

38

12549

00

01

08

12557

00

01

81

12562

00

00

25

12563

00

00

20

12564

00

00

20

12548

00

15

16

12547

00

00

63

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4606

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

12532

00

22

08

12533

00

00

20

12531

00

00

37

12527

00

00

20

12528

00

08

12

12529

00

03

59

12526

00

03

60

12525

00

01

91

12523

00

07

24

12519

00

08

96

12518

00

07

43

12516

00

00

20

12520

00

05

04

12716

00

01

33

12484

00

10

90

12718

00

00

20

12786

00

03

67

12785

00

06

72

12784

00

00

58

12783

00

09

41

12782

00

07

74

12757

00

00

20

12758

00

12

61

12759

00

00

20

12760

00

05

63

12755/15504

00

04

51

12761

00

09

44

12762

00

09

84

12764

00

00

20

12763

00

01

89

13460

00

10

57

13458

00

00

20

13459

00

05

43

13463

00

06

74

13465

00

09

87

13467

00

07

95

13470

00

00

99

13431

00

08

18

13430

00

06

01

13429

00

00

80

13428

00

04

64

13427

00

00

20

13415

00

10

00

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4607

13415/15550

00

00

20

13415/15552

00

07

89

13409

00

00

20

13416

00

03

89

13417

00

00

20

13408

00

09

74

13411

00

00

20

13407

00

06

39

13406

00

00

20

13504

00

04

02

13660

00

13

42

13661

00

01

23

13669

00

00

70

13668

00

10

34

13667

00

03

57

13666

00

02

33

13665

00

04

90

13692

00

00

20

13693

00

09

37

13694

00

06

17

13695

00

00

40

13687

00

00

20

13686

00

07

03

13702

00

00

20

13685

00

00

40

13731

00

06

48

13684

00

00

20

13733

00

01

77

13732

00

01

74

13734

00

04

35

13730

00

01

49

13735

00

08

20

13736

00

00

20

13737

00

01

51

14970

00

00

49

14969

00

06

57

14971

00

01

99

14968

00

05

96

14966

00

07

61

14967

00

00

20

14964

00

02

24

14965

00

06

21

14963

00

00

20

5761

00

00

78

5763

00

01

78

5762

00

08

65

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4608

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

5776

00

03

32

5764

00

08

16

5772/15469

00

03

83

5774

00

00

20

5773

00

02

79

5772

00

05

67

5771

00

04

82

5770

00

01

66

5775

00

04

90

5827

00

03

45

5826

00

09

16

5834

00

10

28

5832

00

00

20

5833

00

00

83

5840

00

09

53

5839

00

01

44

5841

00

07

11

5842

00

01

57

5843

00

06

51

5844

00

01

96

14907

00

00

20

14906

00

00

54

14902

00

04

53

14903

00

07

29

14904

00

03

09

13840

00

00

20

13841

00

15

86

14884

00

00

20

13842

00

00

82

13845

00

03

10

13844

00

01

66

13843

00

00

20

13846-Road

00

02

37

14871-Road

00

02

79

13884

00

00

77

14874

00

01

81

14858

00

03

10

14862

00

05

07

14861

00

06

68

14863

00

00

60

14860

00

00

20

14864

00

09

61

14869

00

00

20

14865

00

00

20

14868

00

03

90

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4609

14867

00

08

74

14866

00

07

90

6792

00

11

10

6795

00

00

20

6793

00

10

67

6794

00

00

45

6789-Road

00

04

34

6787

00

03

48

6786

00

00

44

6788

00

10

52

6407

00

14

92

6411

00

14

78

6416

00

00

28

6418

00

05

06

6417

00

08

75

6421

00

00

20

6430

00

11

95

6429

00

05

78

6431

00

03

70

6428

00

00

32

6432

00

09

62

6427

00

07

23

6456

00

07

12

6457

00

03

02

6455

00

04

75

6458

00

08

26

6462

00

00

20

6461

00

00

91

6459

00

04

32

6460

00

03

66

6478

00

11

92

6505

00

02

31

6506

00

11

81

6507

00

14

47

6511

00

00

95

6508

00

00

96

6510

00

06

55

6509

00

04

78

6512

00

02

07

6524-Road

00

04

07

6535

00

06

09

6534

00

04

50

6533

00

03

46

6532

00

01

71

6072

00

10

46

6073

00

00

20

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

4610

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

6071

00

19

48

6079

00

00

20

6080

00

00

20

6082

00

03

15

6083

00

05

39

6070

00

00

40

6084

00

14

44

6068

00

19

91

6087

00

03

09

299

00

14

81

298

00

00

43

6089

00

00

20

296

00

00

97

297

00

14

76

6091

00

00

20

6092

00

01

15

295

00

02

02

291

00

00

20

290

00

13

60

289

00

00

32

282

00

06

05

287

00

00

20

286

00

00

20

285

00

00

20

284

00

00

46

283

00

04

83

272

00

02

77

278

00

01

32

273

00

02

03

274

00

02

20

275

00

02

17

276

00

02

23

265

00

08

52

264

00

13

13

232

00

00

20

254

00

00

20

259

00

14

15

258

00

05

69

256

00

01

90

257

00

03

93

250

00

00

97

249

00

05

08

248

00

10

52

247

00

02

13

246

00

00

20

8617

00

29

58

8618

00

20

29

8782

00

62

18

8783

00

00

29

8784

00

04

74

8785

00

00

20

8787

00

13

42

8788

00

60

06

8789-F.C.

00

01

83

8790

00

35

92

8791

00

18

28

8792-Nala

00

02

04

8847

00

06

49

8848-Nala

00

04

58

8846

00

01

95

8849

00

06

47

8850

00

16

47

8851

00

00

87

47

00

05

41

46

00

00

20

48

00

07

30

49

00

04

30

50

00

00

20

51

00

00

20

52

00

09

67

53

00

09

43

54

00

03

55

59

00

14

13

60

00

12

01

63

00

11

44

64

00

07

41

65

00

09

88

66

00

14

98

67

00

00

20

93-Nala

00

06

09

235

00

20

10

236

00

00

20

240

00

00

90

241

00

21

68

238

00

00

20

239

00

00

30

242

00

08

73

266-Road

00

01

94

[F. No. R-25011/17/2013-OR-I]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4611

4612

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Je ,oa jkstxkj ea=kky;

ubZ fnYyh] 5 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1633-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj ¯lMhdsV cSad

ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;&1] fnYyh ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 53@2011)

dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 01&07&2013 dks

çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y&12012@09@95&vkbZvkj (ch&II)º

lqefr ldykuh] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

New Delhi, the 5th July, 2013

S.O. 1633.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 53/2011)

of the Central Government Labour Court No. 1, Delhi now

as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between

the employers in relation to the management of Syndicate

Bank and their workman, which was received by the Central

Government on 01-07-2013.

[No. L- 12012/09/95-IR(B-II)]

SUMATI SAKLANI, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE DR. R. K. YADAV, PRESIDING

OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERMENT INDUSTRIAL

TRIBUNAL NO. 1, KARKARDOOMA COURTS

COMPLEX, DELHI

I.D. No. 53/2011

The General Secretary,

Syndicate Bank Staff Union,

Mehra Chamber,

Desh Bandhu Gupta Road,

New Delhi.

. . .Claimant

Versus

The Asstt. General Manager,

Syndicate Bank, Zonal Office No. 6,

Bhagwan Dass Road,

New Delhi-110001.

. . .Management

AWARD

A clerk posted at Old Rajendar Nagar branch, New

Dethi, Syndicate Bank (in short the bank) committed

misconduct and acted preducial to the interest of the bank.

He was charge sheeted on 4-7-92. A domestic enquiry was

conducted against him. Enquiry Officer concluded that the

charges stood established against him. The Disciplinary

Authority awarded punishment of dismissal to him. He

approached Syndicate Bank Staff Union (in short the union)

for redressed of his grievances. The union raised an

industrial dispute before the Conciliation Officer. Since the

bank contested his claim, conciliation proceedings ended

into a failure. On consideration of failure report, submitted

by a conciliation Officer, the appropriate Government

referred the dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication, vide

order No. L-12012/9/95-IR(B-II), New Delhi dated 19-5-95,

with following terms :

“Whether the action of the management of Syndicate

Bank, New Delhi in dismissing Shri Brahmanand,

Clerk, from service w.e.f. 30-10-1993 is legal and

justified? If not, what relief is the said workman

entitled to?”

2. Claim statement was filed by on behalf of the

claimant, namely, Shri Brahmanand pleading that he was

appointed as a clerk by the bank in 1974. He had

unblemished record of service. A charge sheet was served

upon him on 4-7-92, which was preceded by an order of

suspension. During long period of his suspension, he was

virtually driven to starvation since huge recovery was made

by the bank from his subsistence allowance. Though he

made representation against those recoveries, yet the bank

passed an order dated 6-4-92 upholding illegal recoveries.

Since a meagre sum of subsistence allowance was paid, he

was unable to defend himself properly. His suspension

was for prolonged for a period over 20 months without any

cause or reason.

3. It has been pleaded that charge sheet contained

false allegation, which lacked material particulars.

Reasonable opportunities to defend was denied to him.

The Enquiry Officer had disallowed vital questions, which

were put to the witnesses during course of cross-

examination. The enquiry was farce. Enquiry Officer

submitted his report dated 15-7-93, which contained

perverse findings. The Disciplinary Authority imposed

punishment of dismissal. He preferred an appeal which

was dismissed by a non speaking unreasonable order dated

7-5-94. It has been claimed that since the claimant raised a

voice against his superior officers, he was made a

scapegoat. The domestic action nowhere answers

standards of principles of natural justice. It has been

claimed that his dismissal may be declared illegal and he

may be reinstated in service with continuity, full back wages

and all consequential benefits.

4. Claim was demurred by the bank pleading that the

claimant committed grave misconducts while posted at

Rajendar Nagar branch of the bank, when he was entrusted

with duties of a special assistant on temporary basis from

time to time. Charge sheet dated 4-7-92 was served upon

him. It has been pleaded that subsistence allowance was

paid to the claimant, in accordance with rules. The claimant

had taken advances and there was contract between the

bank and the claimant to make recoveries of dues from him,

hence those recoveries were effected from his subsistence

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4613

allowance. The recoveries where consonance with terms

of the contract, entered into between the parties. The

claimant cannot allege that those recoveries were not

justified. Due opportunities were accorded to the claimant

to defend himself before the Enquiry Officer. The Enquiry

Officer observed principles of natural justice, during the

conduct of the enquiry. All opportunities were accorded to

the claimant to defend himself. He was represented by an

office bearer of the union before the Enquiry Officer, who

conducted his defence diligently. Charges stood proved

before the Enquiry Officer and he submitted his report dated

15-7-93 to the Disciplinary Authority. The Disciplinary

Authority concurred with the report of Enquiry Officer and

proposed a punishment of dismissal. After giving a personal

hearing to the claimant, punishment of dismissal was

awarded to him, vide order dated 30-10-93. Appeal preferred

by the claimant, also came to be dismissed. The bank pleads

that punishment awarded to the claimant commensurate

with his misconduct. The claimant is not entitled to any

relief muchless the relief of reinstatement with continuity,

full back wages and all consequential benefits.

5. On pleadings of the parties, following issues were

settled :

(i) Whether the domestic enquiry conducted against

the workman is fair and proper?

(ii) As in terms of reference.

6. The case was transferred to the Central Govt.

Industrial Tribunal No. 2, New Delhi, for adjudication by

the appropriate Govt., vide order No. Z-22019/6/2007-IR

(C-II), New Delhi dated 11-02-2008. Vide order No. Z-22019/

6/2007 -IR(C-II), New Delhi dated 30-03-2011, the case was

re-transferred by the appropriate Government to this

Tribunal for adjudication.

7. On consideration of facts testified by the claimant

and those detailed by Shri Laxmi Narain, Manager, the

Tribunal answered the preliminary issue on the virus of

enquiry in favour of the bank and against the claimant,

vide order dated 20-6-2011.

8. Arguments were heard on proportionality of

punishment. Shri M.A.Khan, authorized representatives,

advanced arguments on behalf of the claimant. Shri Rajesh

Mahendru, authorized representatives, raised his

submissions on behalf of the bank. I have given my careful

considerations to the arguments advanced at the bar and

cautiously perused the record. My. findings on issues

involved in the controversy are as follows :

Issue No. 2

9. Prior to introduction of section 11A of the Act,

adjudicatory powers of the Tribunal were articulated in

Buckingham & Carnatic Company [1951 (2) LLJ 314]. Four

standards were delineated by the Labour Appellate

Tribunal in the above case to render managerial right of

taking disciplinary action vulnerable, namely, (i) where there

is a want of bonafides or (ii) when it is a case of victimization

or unfair labour practice or violation of the principles of

natural justice; or (iii) when there is basic error of facts, or

(iv) when there has been a perverse finding on the materials.

This articulation was adopted by the Apex Court with slight

modification in Indian Iron and Steel Company Limited

[1958 (1) LLJ 260], without any acknowledgement to the

precedent in Buckingham & Carnatic case (supra), wherein

it was ruled that the power of the management to direct its

own internal administration and discipline was not unlimited

and liable to be interfered with by industrial adjudication

when a dispute arises to see whether termination of services

of a workman is justified and to give appropriate relief.

However, it was announced that the jurisdiction of an

Industrial Tribunal to interfere with the managerial

prerogative of taking disciplinary action is not of appellate

nature as the legislature has not chosen to confer such

jurisdiction upon it. Hence Tribunal could not substitute

its own judgement for that of the management. The Court

laid down that in the following circumstances an industrial

adjudicator can interfere with the disciplinary action taken

by the employer : (1) when there is want of good faith,

(2) when there was victimization or unfair labour practice,

(3) when the management had been guilty of a basic error

or violation of the principles of natural justice, or (4) when

on the materials, the finding was completely baseless or

perverse.

10. Enunciation (1) and (2), referred above, are

addressed to the bona-fides of the employer in initiating

the action and inflicting the punishment, while postulates

(3) and (4) are addressed to domestic enquiry. Therefore,

an employer is required to act bona-fide in initiating

disciplinary action as well as in inflicting the punishment.

In initiating the action, the alleged act of misconduct should

not be a ruse for something else, such as the trade union

activities of the workman or employers dislike of him for

some personal reasons. The action should not be motivated

by vindictiveness or ulterior purpose, so as to smack for

victimization or unfair labour practice. Likewise in the matter

of inflicting punishment, the employer should act fairly.

In case punishment awarded is so shockingly dis-

proportionate to the act of the misconduct, as no

reasonable man would ever impose that itself may lead to

an inference of malafides, victimization or unfair labour

practice. In holding enquiry, the Enquiry Officer must

comply with the rules of natural justice. He must not be a

biased person and give reasonable opportunity to both

sides for being heard. His findings should not be baseless

or perverse.

11. In Ramswarth Sinha (1954 L.A.C. 697) the Labour

Appellate Tribunal recognized the right of the management

to ask for permission to adduce evidence before the Tribunal

to justify its action in a "no enquiry" case. Following that

proposition the Apex Court equated the cases of "defective

4614

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

enquiry" with "no enquiry" cases and ruled that in either

cases, the Tribunal have jurisdiction to go into the merits

of the case on the basis of evidence adduced before it by

the parties. Reference can be made to the precedent in

Motipur Sugar Factory Pvt. Ltd. [1965 (2) LLJ 162] where

the employer had held no enquiry at all before the dismissal

and, therefore, adduced evidence to justify its action before

the Tribunal,which decision was upheld. The Apex Court

discarded the plea on behalf of the workman that since no

enquiry at all had been held by the employer, it had no right

to adduce evidence to justify its stand before the Tribunal.

In Ritz Theatre [1962 (II) LLJ 498] it was ruled by the Supreme

Court that the Tribunal would be justified to go to the

merits of the case and decide for itself on the basis of the

evidence adduced whether the charges have indeed been

made out. It announced that it would neither be fair to the

management nor fair to the workman himself in such a case

that the Tribunal should refuse to take the evidence and

thereby drive the management to pass through the whole

process of holding the enquiry all over again. Reference

can also be made to the precedent in Bharat Sugar Mills

Ltd. [1961 (11) LLJ 644].

12. In Delhi Cloth and General Mills Company [1972

(1) LLJ 180], Apex Court considered the catena of decisions

over the subject and laid down the following principles :

“(1) If no domestic enquiry had been held by the

management, or if the management makes it clear

that it does not rely upon any domestic enquiry that

may have been held by it, it is entitled to straightaway

adduce evidence before the Tribunal justifying its

action. The Tribunal is bound to consider that

evidence so adduced before it, on merits, and give a

decision thereon. In such a case, it is not necessary

for the Tribunal to consider the validity of the

domestic enquiry as the employer himself does not

rely on it.

(2) If a domestic enquiry had been held, it is open to

the management to rely upon the domestic enquiry

held by it, in the first instance, and alternatively and

without prejudice to its plea that the enquiry is proper

and binding, simultaneously adduce additional

evidence before the Tribunal justifying its action. In

such a case no inference can be drawn, without

anything more, that the management has given up

the enquiry conducted by it.

(3) When the management relies on the enquiry

conducted by it, and also simultaneously adduces

evidence before the Tribunal, without prejudice to

its plea that the enquiry proceedings are proper, it is

the duty of the Tribunal, in the first instance, to

consider whether the enquiry proceedings

conducted by the management, are valid and proper.

If the Tribunal is satisfied that the enquiry

proceedings have been held properly and are valid,

the question of considering the evidence adduced

before it on merits, no longer survives. It is only

when the holds that the enquiry proceedings have

not been properly held, that it derives jurisdiction to

deal with the merits of the dispute and in such a case

it has to consider the evidence adduced before it by

the management and decide the matter on the basis

of such evidence.

(4) When the domestic enquiry has been held by the

management and the management relies on the same,

it is open to the latter to request the Tribunal to try

the validity of the domestic enquiry as a preliminary

issue and also ask for an opportunity to adduce

evidence before the Tribunal, if the finding on the

preliminary issue is against the management.

However, elaborate and cumbersome the procedure

may be, under such circumstances, it is open to the

Tribunal to deal, in the first instance, as a preliminary

issue the validity of the domestic enquiry. If its

finding on the preliminary issue is in favour of the

management, then no additional evidence need be

cited by the management. But, if the finding on the

preliminary issue is against the management, the

Tribunal will have to give the employer an

opportunity to cite additional evidence and also give

a similar opportunity to the employee to lead evidence

contra, as the request to adduce evidence had been

made by the management to the Tribunal during the

course of the proceedings and before the trial has

come to an end. When the preliminary issue is decided

against the management and the latter leads evidence

before the Tribunal, the position, under such

circumstances, will be, that the management is

deprived of the benefit of having the finding of the

domestic Tribunal being accepted as prima facie proof

of the alleged misconduct. On the other hand, the

management will have to prove, by adducing proper

evidence, that the workman is guilty of misconduct

and that the action taken by it is proper. It will not be

just and fair either to the management or to the

workman that the Tribunal should refuse to take

evidence and thereby ask the management to take a

further application, after holding a proper enquiry,

and deprive the workman of the benefit of the

Tribunal itself being satisfied, on evidence adduced

before it, that he was or was not guilty of the alleged

misconduct.

(5) The management has got a right to attempt to

sustain its order by adducing independent evidence

before the Tribunal. But the management should avail

itself of the said opportunity by making a suitable

request to the Tribunal before the proceedings are

closed. If no such opportunity has been available of,

or asked for by the management, before the

proceedings are closed, the employer can make no

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4615

grievance that the Tribunal did not provide such an

opportunity. The Tribunal will have before it only

the enquiry proceedings and it has to decide whether

the proceedings have been held properly and the

findings recorded therein are also proper.

(6) If the employer relies only on the domestic enquiry

and does not simultaneously lead additional

evidence or ask for an opportunity during the

pendency of the proceedings to adduce such

evidence, the duty of the Tribunal is only to consider

the validity of the domestic enquiry as well as the

finding recorded therein and decide the matter. If the

Tribunal decides that the domestic enquiry has not

been held properly, it is not its function to invite suo

moto the employer to adduce evidence before it to

justify the action taken by it.

(7) The above principles apply to the proceedings

before the Tribunal, which have come before it either

on a reference under Section 10 or by way of an

application under Section 33 of the Act.

13. Keeping in view the proposition laid by the Apex

Court in Delhi Cloth and General Mills Company (supra),

the Parliament inserted Section 11-A in the Act, which came

into force w.e.f. 15th of December,1971. In the statement of

objects and reasons for inserting Section 11-A, it was

stated:

"In Indian Iron and Steel Company Limited and

Another Vs. Their Workmen (AIR 1958 S.C. 130 at

p.138), the Supreme Court, while considering the

Tribunal's power to interfere with the management's

decision to dismiss, discharge or terminate the

services of a workman, has observed that in case of

dismissal on misconduct, the Tribunal does not

act as a court of appeal and substitute its own

judgment for that of the management and that the

Tribunal will interfere only when there is want of

good faith, victimization, unfair labour practice, etc.,

on the part of the management.

2. The International Labour Organisation, in its

recommendation (No.119) concerning 'Termination

of employment at the initiative of the employer'

adopted in June, 1963, has recommended that a

worker aggrieved by the termination of his

employment should be entitled to appeal against the

termination among others, to a neutral body such as

an arbitrator, a court, an arbitration committee or a

similar body and that the neutral body concerned

should be empowered to examine the reasons given

in the termination of employment and the other

circumstances relating to the case and to render a

decision on the justification of the termination.

The International Labour Organisation has further

recommended that the neutral body should be

empowered (if it finds that the termination of

employment was unjustified) to order that the worker

concerned, unless reinstated with unpaid wages,

should be paid adequate compensation or afforded

some other relief.

3. In accordance with these recommendations, it is

considered that theTribunal's power in an

adjudication proceeding relating to discharge or

dismissal of a workman should not be limited and

that the Tribunal should have the power, in cases

wherever necessary to set aside the order of

discharge or dismissal and direct reinstatement of

the workman on such terms and conditions, if any,

as it thinks fit or give such other reliefs to the

workman including the award of any lesser

punishment in lieu of discharge or dismissal as the

circumstances of the case may require. For this

purpose, a new Section 11-A is proposed to be

inserted in the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947......’’.

14. After insertion of Section 11-A, the Apex Court

summed up the law in the case of Firestone Tyre and

Rubber Company [1973 (1) LLJ 278] in the following

propositions :

"(1) The right to take disciplinary action and to decide

upon the quantum of punishment are mainly

managerial functions, but if a dispute is referred to a

Tribunal, the latter has power to see if action of the

employer is justified.

(2) Before imposing the punishment, as employer is

expected to conduct a proper enquiry in accordance

with the provisions of the Standing Orders, if

applicable, and principles of natural justice. The

enquiry should not be an empty formality.

(3) When a proper enquiry has been held by an

employer, and the finding of misconduct is a plausible

conclusion flowing from the evidence, adduced at

the said enquiry, the Tribunal has no jurisdiction to

sit in judgement over the decision of the employer as

an appellate body. The interference with the decision

of the employer will be justified only when the

findings arrived at in the enquiry are perverse or the

management is guilty of victimization, unfair labour

practice or mala fide.

(4) Even if no enquiry has been held by an employer

or if the enquiry held by him is found to be defective,

the Tribunal in order to satisfy itself about the legality

and validity of the order, had to give an opportunity

to the employer and employee to adduce evidence

before it. It is open to the employer to adduce

evidence for the first time justifying his action, and it

is open to the employee to adduce evidence contra.

4616

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(5) The effect of an employer not holding an enquiry

is that the Tribunal would not have to consider only

whether there was a prima facie case. On the other

hand, the issue about the merits of the impugned

order of dismissal or discharge is at large before the

Tribunal and the latter, on the evidence adduced

before it, has to decide for itself whether the

misconduct alleged is proved. In such cases, the

point about the exercise of managerial functions

does not arise at all. A case of defective enquiry

stands on the same footing as no enquiry.

(6) The Tribunal gets jurisdiction to consider the

evidence placed before it for the first time in

justification of the action taken only, if no enquiry

has been held or after the enquiry conducted by an

employer is found to be defective.

(7) It has never been recognized that the Tribunal

should straightaway, without anything more, direct

reinstatement of a dismissed or discharged employee,

once it is found that no domestic enquiry has been

held or the said enquiry is found to be defective.

(8) An employer, who wants to avail himself of the

opportunity of adducing evidence for the first time

before the Tribunal to justify his action, should ask

for it at the appropriate stage. If such an opportunity

is asked for, the Tribunal has no power to refuse.

The giving of an opportunity to an employer to

adduce evidence for the first time before the Tribunal

is in the interest of both the management and the

employee and to enable the Tribunal itself to be

satisfied about the alleged misconduct.

(9) Once the misconduct is proved either in the

enquiry conducted by an employer or by the evidence

placed before a Tribunal for the first time, punishment

imposed cannot, be interfered with by the Tribunal

except in cases where the punishment is so harsh as

to suggest victimization.

(10) In a particular case, after setting aside the order

of dismissal, whether a workman should be re-

instated or paid compensation is, as held by this

Court in The Management of Panitole Tea Estate Vs.

The workmen, within the judicial decision of a Labour

Court or Tribunal".

15. Jurisdiction to interfere with the punishment is

also not confined to the case where punishment is

shockingly disproportionate to the act of the misconduct.

The Tribunal has power of substituting its own measure of

punishment in place of managerial wisdom. Change in legal

position, post introduction of Section 11A of the Act has

been effectively summarized in the case of Ambassador

Sky Chef (1996 Lab. I.C. 299) wherein High Court of Bombay

observed that the section gives specifically two fold powers

to an industrial adjudicator : firstly, it is a virtual power of

appeal against the findings of fact made by the Enquiry

Officer in his report with regard to the adequacy of the

evidence and conclusion on facts, and secondly, and far

more important, it is the power of re-appraisal of quantum

of punishment. Now no restriction lies on an industrial

adjudicator to interfere with the enquiry only on four

grounds, referred above. However, wide discretionary

powers with the adjudicator are to be exercised in judicial

and judicious manner before it interferes with the order of

misconduct or punishment.

16.With this prelude, now I would turn to facts of the

present controversy. As emerged out of the order dated

20-6-2011, the Tribunal had considered the factum of

service of charge-sheet on the claimant, calling upon him

to submit his statement of defence. It was also taken note

of that the chare-sheet was specific and unambiguous.

Enquiry Officer called upon the claimant to putforth his

case. Opportunities were accorded to the claimant to defend

himself in the enquiry. Therefore, it is evident that the issues

relating to bonafides of the bank and according opportunity

of being heard were addressed to and found against the

claimant. Issue relating to perversity of report of the Enquiry

Officer was also answered against him. Thus it is evident

that all issues, except issue relating to proportionality of

punishment, were adjudicated against the claimant.

17. As record projects, charge-sheet dated 04-07-1992

was served, wherein it is detailed that the claimant passed

for cheques on various dates pertaining to SB A/c 35835

even though he was not working in SB Dept. and not

empowered to pass those cheques independently. The

claimant unauthorisedly parted with an amount of Rs. 1.00

lakh on 15-3-92 out of a cash of Rs. 2,70,000 and paid that

amount unathorisedly to the bearer of cheque No. 077225,

at the service counter. The claimant had tampered with the

records of the branch on 15-3-92 and made a fictitious entry

in the SB Ledger folio of SB A/c 35835 with a malafied

intention of making available an amount of Rs.1.50 lakh to

the party, for which amount they were not entitled. The

claimant further debited a cheque, referred above, for

Rs.1.00 lakh and verified signatures of the party, for which

act he was not empowered to do so.

18. On these charges the Enquiry Officer recorded

his report dated 15-7-1993 wherein he concluded that all

charges stood proved against the claimant. It would be in

the fitness of things to extract conclusions arrived at by

the Enquiry Officer which are reproduced thus :—

"Findings :

"I therefore, hold the CSE guilty of :

(i) having passed a cheque without authority;

(ii) having inflated the balance in the account

No. 35835 with malafide motives.

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4617

(iii) passing a cheque against such inflated balance

without having the authority/jurisdiction over the

account.

(iv) having parted with the cash at the Extension

Counter without authonty.

Therefore, it is clearly established that the CSE is

guilty of gross misconduct of doing acts prejudicial

to the interest of the Bank under Clause No. 19.5 (j)

of Bipartite Settlement- 1966”.

19. During the course of arguments it was urged that

punishment of dismissal from service was proposed on the

claimant and show-cause notice was given. After giving

personal hearing, punishment of dismissal was, awarded

to the claimant vide order dated 30-10-1993. The bank

presents that the punishment of dismissal commensurate

to his misconduct. On the other hand claimant argues that

no pecuniary loss was caused to the bank, since money

was recovered from the party. He agitates that his long

unblemished service was not taken into consideration and

punishment is shockingly disproportionate to his

misconduct.

20. After insertion of Section 11-A of the Act, the

jurisdiction to interfere with the punishment is there with

the Tribunal, who has to see whether punishment imposed

by the employer commensurate with the gravity of the act

of misconduct. If it comes to the conclusion that the

misconduct is proved, it may still hold that the punishment

is not justified because misconduct alleged and proved is

such as it does not warrant punishment of discharge or

dismissal and where necessary, set aside the order of

discharge or dismissal and direct reinstatement with or

without any terms or conditions as it thinks fit or give any

other relief, including the award of lessor punishment, in

lieu of discharge or dismissal, as the circumstance of the

case may warrant. Reference can be made to a precedent in

Sanatak Singh (1984 Lab. I.C. 817). The discretion to award

punishment lesser than the punishment of discharge or

dismissal has to be judiciously exercised and the Tribunal

can interfere only when it is satisfied that the punishment

imposed by the management is highly disproportionate to

the decree of the guilt of the workman. Reference can be

made to the precedent in Kachraji Motiji Parmar [1994 (II)

LLJ 332]. Thus it is evident that the Tribunal has now

jurisdiction and power of substituting its own measure of

punishment in place of the managerial wisdom, once it is

satisfied that the order of discharge or dismissal is not

justified. On facts and in the circumstances of a case,

section 11A of the Act specifically gives two folds powers

to the Industrial Tribunal, first is virtually the power of

appeal against findings of fact made by the Enquiry Officer

in his report with regard to the adequacy of the evidence

and the conclusion on facts and secondly of foremost

importance, is the power of reappraisal of quantum of

punishment.

21. Power to set aside order of discharge or dismissal

and grant relief of reinstatement or lesser punishment is

not untramaled power. This power has to be exercised only

when Tribunal is satisfied that the order of discharge or

dismissal was not justified. This satisfaction of the

Tribunal is objective satisfaction and not subjective one.

It involves application of the mind by the Tribunal to

various circumstances like nature of delinquency committed

by the workman, his past conduct, impact of delinquency

on employer's business, besides length of service rendered

by him. Furthermore, the Tribunal has to consider whether

the decision taken by the employer is just or not. Only after

taking into consideration these aspects, the Tribunal can

upset the punishment imposed by the employer. The

quantum of punishment cannot be interfered with without

recording specific findings on points referred above. No

indulgence is to be granted to a person, who is guilty of

grave misconduct like cheating, fraud, misappropriation of

employers fund, theft of public property etc. A reference

can be made to the precedent in Bhagirath Mal Rainwa

[1995 (1) LLJ 960].

22. An employer would expect loyalty towards him

from his employee. In other words, the employee is expected

to promote interest of his employer in connection with the

job for which he has been engaged. Contract of an

employment engrafts a stipulation that the employee should

serve his master with good faith and fidelity. When an

employee makes a false record or document with a view to

deceive his employer, he commits an act of dishonesty or

fraud. When false entries are made in official records,

certifying an amount existing in the account of a party

more than what it has, in fact the employee forges the

record, deceives his employer and commits serious acts of

dishonesty and fraud. As detailed above, the claimant

recorded false entry in saving bank account No. 35835

maintained by Smt. Manju Goyal and projected that an

amount of Rs. 150571.78 was lying therein, while in fact

there was a balance of Rs. 571.78 only in that account as on

15-3-92. The claimant committed a very grave misconduct.

He also passed cheque of Rs. 26000 without any authority.

Chque of Rs. 1 lakh was passed by him against the inflected

balance in the account of Smt. Manju Goyal, without an

authority. He parted with the cash of Rs.1 lakh at the

extension counter without any authority. All these facts

make it clear that misconduct committed by the claimant

was of alasming nature, justifying penalty of dismissal.

Punishment awarded to the claimant cannot be termed as

disproportionate to his misconduct. By no stretch of

imagination the punishment can be termed as arbitrary, an

act of unfair labour practice an victimization. I conclude

that punishment awarded to the claimant is reasonable and

justified. He is not entitled to any relief much less the relief

of reinstatement in service with continuity, full back

wages and all consequential benefits. His claim is discarded.

An award is passed in favour of the bank and against the

4618

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

claimant/union. It be sent to the appropriate Govt. for

publication.

Dr. R. K.YADAV, Presiding Officer

Dated : 29-11-2012

ubZ fnYyh] 5 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1634-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj vksfj;.Vy cSad

vkWiQ dkWelZ ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa

ds chp vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;&1] fnYyh ds iapkV (lanHkZ

la[;k 282@2011) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks

01&07&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y&12012@59@2005&vkbZvkj (ch&II)º

lqefr ldykuh] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 5th July, 2013

S.O. 1634.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 282/

2011) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour

Court No. 1, Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the

industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to

the management of Oriental Bank of Commerce and their

workman, which was received by the Central Government

on 01-07-2013.

[No. L- 12012/59/2005-IR(B-II)]

SUMATI SAKLANI, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE DR. R. K. YADAV, PRESIDING

OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERMENT INDUSTRIAL

TRIBUNAL NO. 1, KARKARDOOMA COURTS

COMPLEX, DELHI

I.D. No. 282/2011

Shri Hari Om S/o Sh.Chanda Ram,

H. No.507-L, Model Town,

Balmiki Basti, Badi Market,

Karnal, Haryana ....Workman

Versus

The Deputy General Manager,

Oriental Bank of Commerce,

Regional Office,

Karnal, Haryana ....Management

AWARD

A personal driver was employed by the Deputy

General Manager, posted at Regional Office, Karnal,

Haryana, Oriental Bank of Commerce (in short the bank).

The personal driver used to drive vehicle No.HR-05J-0841,

which vehicle was owned by the bank. He served the

Deputy General Manager till 6-2-04, the date when the

latter was transferred from Karnal to some other place. His

services came to an end, at that juncture. Since the personal

driver belaboured under a belief that he was an employee

of the bank, he raised a demand on the bank for

reinstatement of his services. Since his demand was not

conceded to, he raised an industrial dispute before the

Conciliation Officer. The bank contested his claim and as

such conciliation proceedings ended into a failure. On

consideration of failure report, submitted by Conciliation

Officer, the appropriate Govt. referred the dispute to this

Tribunal for adjudication, vide order No. L-12012/59/2005-

IR(B-II), New Delhi, dated 09-08-2005 with following terms:

"Whether the action of the management of Oriental

Bank of Commerce in terminating the services of

Hari Om S/o Sh.Chanda Ram, Driver w.e.f. 6-2-2004

is just and legal? If not, what relief the concerned

workman is entitled to?"

2. Claim statement was filed by the personal driver,

namely, Shri Hari Om pleading that he was employed by

the bank at its regional office Karnal on the post of a

driver w.e.f. 1st May, 2001. Fixed salary of Rs.2700 per

month was paid to him. Duties of driving vehicle No. HR-

05J-0841 were assigned to him. He was performing his

duties under the directions of the Deputy General Manager

of the bank. Log book was usually got signed from him by

the officer, who used that vehicle. He also use to sign

various vouchers/bills, issued by the agencies at the time

of repair/service of the vehicle. He continuously served

the bank till 5-2-2004. His services were terminated

abruptly without any notice on pay in lieu thereof.

Retrenchment of his service was illegal, since retrenchment

compensation was not paid to him. Action of the bank

was violative of provisions of sections 25-F, 25-G and

25-H of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (in short the

Act). He served a legal notice on the bank, but it was not

responded to. Some other driver was appointed by the

bank in his place. He seeks reinstatement in service with

continuity and full back wages.

3. Claim was contested by the bank pleading that

the claimant was never appointed by the bank. Since

there was no relationship of employer of the employee

between the parties, there was no industrial dispute which

would be referred for adjudication. The bank presents that

the claimant was working as personal driver of

Shri A. K.Tangri, Deputy General Manager, Regional Office,

Karnal. Shri Tangri used to pay his wages. The bank

reimbursed the wages paid by Shri Tangri to the claimant,

subject to ceiling amount. fixed by the bank. The bank

does not dispute that the vehicle driven by the claimant

belong to it. Since the claimant was not an employee of

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4619

the bank, there was no question of terminating his services.

There was no occasion for the bank to give notice or pay

in lieu thereof and retrenchment compensation. Claim put

forward by Shri Hari Om is misconceived, hence it may be

dismissed, pleads the bank.

4. On pleadings of the parties, following issues were

settled by my ld. predecessor.

(i) Whether there existed relationship of employer

and employee between the parties? If so its

effect?

(ii) Whether the workmen was personal driver of

Shri A.K. Tangri, Deputy General Manager,

Regional Office, Karnal?

(iii) As in terms of reference.

5. Vide order No. Z-22019/6/2007 -IR(C-II), New Delhi,

dated 11-02-2008, appropriate Government transferred the

case to the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No.II,

New Delhi, for adjudication. Vide order No. Z-22019/6/2007-

IR(C-II), New Delhi, dated 30-03-2011, the case was re-

transferred by the appropriate Government to this Tribunal

for adjudication.

6. Claimant has examined himself in support of his

claim. Shri Rakesh Kumar Gupta, Senior Manager, was

examined by the bank. No other witness was examined by

either of the parties.

7. Arguments were heard at the bar. Shri Bhagwan

Das, authorized representative, presented facts on behalf

of the claimant. Shri Rajat Arora, authorized representative,

raised his submission on behalf of the bank. I have given

my careful considerations to the arguments advanced at

the bar and cautiously perused the records. My findings

on issues involved in the controversy are as follows :

Issue Nos.1 & 2

8. In affidavit Ex.WW1/A, tendered as evidence,

claimant swears that he was engaged as a driver by the

bank on 1-5-01. His monthly wages were Rs. 2700. He was

driving vehicle No. HR-05J-0841. He used to drive the

vehicle under the instructions of the Deputy General

Manager. Log book of the vehicle was signed by him,

besides the officer using the vehicle. His wages were paid

by the bank through vouchers. He served the bank upto

5-2-04. During the cause of his cross examination he

presents that no appointment letter was issued in his

favour. He admits that in Feb. 2004 Shri Tangri was

transferred from Karnal to some other station.

9. Shri Rakesh Kumar Gupta, unfolds in his affidavit

Ex.MW1/A, tendered as evidence, that relationship of

employer and employee never existed between the parties.

The claimant was never appointed by the bank. He was

personal driver of Shri A.K. Tangri, Deputy General

Manager, Regional Office, Karnal. He was paid his wages

by Shri Tangri. The bank used to reimburse wages paid by

Shri Tangri to the claimant, subject to ceiling amount fixed

in that regard. Vide letter dated 23-6-97, the Govt. of India

has ordered that no personal drivers shall be absorbed in

the bank on regular basis. The claimant never worked with

the bank.

10. When facts unfolded by the claimant and those

detailed by Shri Rakesh Kumar Gupta are appreciated it

came to light that the bank never engaged the claimant in

its service. No appointment letter was ever issued by the

bank in favour of the claimant. His wages were paid by

Shri Tangri. Documents Ex.WW1/1 to Ex.WW1/14 go to

re-affirm that Shri Tangri used to pay wages to the claimant.

Copies of log book, which are Ex.WW1/15 to Ex.WW1/47

and those relied by the bank and are Ex.MW1/3 to

Ex.MW1/26, nowhere got to establish that the claimant

was ever engaged by the bank. Entries in the log book are

recorded by the driver with a view to ascertain whether

the vehicle was used by the officer for official purpose or

for private use. It would not matter that these entries are

recorded by a personal driver. When bank permits an

officer to use official vehicle by obtaining services of a

personal driver, in that situation personal driver would

not become an employee of the bank. Therefore entries in

these by book nowhere espouse the cause of the claimant.

Copies of the vouchers, proved by the bank, are Ex.MW1/

27 to Ex.MW1/54. These documents clinch the issue to

the effect that the claimant never served the bank nor his

wages were paid to him by the bank.

11. Whether relationship of employer and employee

existed between the parties? For an answer to this

proposition, it is to be appreciated as to how a contract of

service is entered into. The relationship of employer and

employee is constituted by a contract, express or implied

between employer and employee. A contract of service is

one in which a person undertakes to serve another and to

obey his reasonable orders within the scope of the duty

undertaken. A contract of employment may be inferred

from the conduct which goes to show that such a contract

was intended although never expressed and when there

has, in fact, been employment of the kind usually

performed by the employees. Any such inference,

however, is open to rebuttal as by showing that the relation

between the parties concerned was on a charitable footing

or the parties were relations or partners or were directors

of a limited company which employed no staff. While the

employee, at the time, when his services were engaged,

need not have known the identity of his employer, there

must have been some act or contract by which the parties

recognized one another as master or servant.

12. To establish the fact that he was ever engaged

by the bank in its service, the claimant presses his ocular

testimony in service. Ocular facts detailed by the claimant

4620

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

are self serving words, which do not get support from any

evidence, direct or circumstantial. His testimony stands

discredited by the documentary evidence produced by

the claimant himself, which are Ex.WW1/1 to Ex.WW1/14.

These documents are vouchers as well as receipt which

go to establish that the claimant was paid his wages by

Shri Tangri. The wages paid by him to the claimant were

reimbursed to him by the bank. Documents, which are

Ex.MW1/27 to Ex.MW1/54, go it establish that fact. All

these facts make it apparent that wages of the claimant

were being paid by Shri Tangri. Admittedly no appointment

letter was issued by the bank in favour of claimant. He

was never on the roll of the bank. These facts coupled

with the factum of wages being paid by Shri Tangri to the

claimant make it clear that he was an employee of

Shri Tangri and not of the bank. The claimant has failed to

show that relationship of employer and employee ever

existed between him and the bank. Issues are, therefore,

answered in favour of the bank and against the claimant.

Issue No. 3

13. The claimant was engaged as personal driver by

Shri Tangri. Expenses incurred on his wages were being

reimbursed by the bank to Tangri up to the prescribed

limit. The mere fact that the claimant used to drive vehicle

of the bank for Tangri would not establish any relationship

of employer and employee between the claimant and the

bank. With such a proposition, the Apex Court was

confronted in Gulam Dastgir (AIR 1978 SC 481). In that

case the Area Manager of a nationalized bank was being

given personal allowance by the bank to enable him to

employ personal driver of his own. The jeep which was

being driven by the driver belonged to the bank. Its petrol

and oil requirements and maintenance were within the

financial responsibility of the bank. There was no evidence

to the effect that the driver was employed by the bank or

under its directions and control. There was also no

evidence that the salary of the driver was paid by the

bank. Considering all these aspects, Apex Court ruled that

there was no case of camouflage and sham contract. When

the driver was engaged by the Area Manager, there existed

no control and supervision over the driver by the bank,

which fact negatived existence of relationship of employer

and employee between the parties. Nothing unusual was

noticed by the Apex Court when the bank gave allowance

to its officer for engaging services of a personal driver.

The said precedent is squarely applicable to the present

controversy.

14. Claimant may seek reliance on a precedent in

Ghanshyam (JT 2001 (Suppl.l) SC 229) wherein the Apex

Court was concerned with the powers contained in section

17-B of the Act. It was ruled therein that section 17-B of

the Act does not preclude the High Courts or the Apex

Court under articles 226 and 136 of the Constitution from

passing appropriate interlocatory orders, having regard

to the facts and circumstances of the case. The court may,

depending on the facts of a case, direct payment of full

wages under section 17-B of the Act only by the employer

of the workman. The question whether the workman is

entitled to the full wages last drawn or full salary, which he

would be entitled to in the event of reinstatement while

the award is under challenge in the High Court or Apex

Court, depends upon the terms of the orders passed by

the court, which has to be determined on the interpretation

of the order granting relief.

15. In that matter Ghanshyam was engaged as

personal driver by the Regional Manager of the Dena

Bank at Lucknow. At the end of tenure of the Regional

Manager, services of Ghanshyam were terminated w.e.f.

August,90. He raised an industrial dispute and the

industrial adjudicator passed an award holding that

Ghanshyam was driver of the bank, termination of his

services was uncalled for, hence he was ordered to be

reinstated with back wages. The correctness of the award

was assailed before the High Court of Judicature at

Allahabad. Vide order dated 4-5-2000 High Court directed

that Ghanshyam be paid wages in regular pay scale w.e.f.

December 6, 1996, within one month from the date of

production of the certified copy of that order, failing which

the appellant was directed to appear before the court on

4-7-2001. The said order was under challenge before the

Apex Court. The Apex Court ruled that by the interim order

High Court did not grant relief in terms of section 17-B,

may there is reference to that section in the order.

Therefore, question of payment of "full wages last drawn"

to Ghanshyam does not arise. Consequently it is evident

that the precedent relied in Ghanshyam would not espouse

the case of the claimant.

16. Ghomarbhai Harjibhai Rabari (2005 (2) LLJ 475)

presents a situation when a personal driver engaged by

the Executive of Bank of Baroda was held to be an

employee of the bank. In that case, the driver produced

three vouchers which showed that he had been paid certain

sums of money towards his wages and the said amount

has been debited to the account of the bank. The bank

could not rebut those vouchers. Signatures of the driver

were also there on the register maintained by the bank.

These facts led the Apex Court to conclude that

relationship of employer and employee existed between

the driver and the bank.

17. Here in the present controversy, the claimant

could not show that his wages were paid by the bank or

his name appeared in attendance register or payment scroll

maintained by the bank. On the other hand, it has been

established that he was personal driver of Tangri.

Consequently, the precedent in Gulam Dastgir (supra) rules

the field, as far as facts of the present controversy are

concerned. Relying the said precedent and on

consideration of the facts of the present controversy, it is

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4621

concluded that the claimant was working as a personal

driver of the Deputy General Manager. There was no

occasion for the bank to deal with the claimant at all.

18. Since there existed no relationship of employer

and employee between the claimant and the bank,

termination of services of the claimant by the Deputy

General Manager, in the event of his transfer to some other

station nowhere violates provisions of the Act. It cannot

be said that the claimant was an industrial employee and a

workman within the meaning of clause (s) of section 2 of

the Act. It cannot be said that dispensation of his services

amounted to retrenchment within the meaning of clause

(oo) of section 2 of the Act. Under these circumstances

provisions of sections 25-F, 25-G and 25-H of the Act

nowhere come for rescue of the claimant. He is not entitled

to any relief from the bank. An award is passed in favour

of the bank and against the claimant. It be sent to the

appropriate Government for publication.

.

Dr. R. K.YADAV, Presiding Officer

Dated : 12-12-2012

ubZ fnYyh] 5 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1635-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj ¯lfMdsV cSad ds

çca/ra=k ds laca¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/ esa

fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je

U;k;ky;&1 fnYyh ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 35@2011) dks çdkf'kr

djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 01&07&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y&12012@28@2000&vkbZvkj (ch&II)º

lqefr ldykuh] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 5th July, 2013

S.O. 1635.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 35/2011)

of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour

Court, No. 1, Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the

industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of Syndicate Bank and their workman, which

was received by the Central Government on 01-07-2013.

[No. L- 12012/28/2000-IR(B-II)]

SUMATI SAKLANI, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE DR. R. K. YADAV, PRESIDING

OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERMENT INDUSTRIAL

TRIBUNAL NO. 1, KARKARDOOMA COURTS

COMPLEX, DELHI

I.D. No. 35/2011

Shri K. Periaswami,

C/o No.6, Mahadev Road,

New Delhi - 110001. ....Workman

Versus

The Asst. General Manager,

Syndicate Bank,

6-Bhagwan Dass Road,

Sarojini House,

New Delhi-11 0001. ....Management

AWARD

While working as clerk in Foreign Exchange

Branch, New Delhi, Syndicate Bank (in short the bank)

Shri K.Periaswami opened saving bank account No. 3785,

4116 and 4410 in his own name saving bank account

No. 4503 in the name of his wife Smt.Meena with his own

introduction and carried out instructions involving

turnover running into crores of rupees which were beyond

the scope of his employment. Transactions in these

accounts were done almost on regular basis either through

demand drafts or through clearing and the amounts, so

credited, were withdrawn on the same date. The demand

drafts were drawn/issued by various branches of the bank

or other banks at Tamilnadu and Pondicherry. It led to the

authorities that the claimant and his wife were having

assets disproportionate to their known source of income.

The claimant was arrested by the Central Bureau of

Investigation on 25.9.97. The bank issued a charge sheet

to the claimant on 28.1.98 and domestic enquiry was

conducted. The Enquiry Officer recorded findings against

Shri K.Periaswami. The Disciplinary Authority concurred

with the Enquiry Officer and awarded punishment of

dismissal to him. Aggrieved by the punishment awarded

to him, Shri K.Periaswami raised a demand of reinstatement

in service. When his demand was not conceded to, he

raised an industrial dispute before the Conciliation Officer.

The bank contested his claims and as such conciliation

proceedings ended into a failure. On consideration of

failure report, submitted by Conciliation Officer, the

appropriate Govt. referred the dispute to this Tribunal for

adjudication, vide order No.L-12012/28/2000-IR(B-II) New

Delhi, dated 13-06-2000 with following terms:

"Whether the dismissal of Shri K.Periaswami,

workman from service by the management of

Syndicate Bank is legal and justified? If not, what

relief is the workman concerned entitled to?"

2. Claim statement was filed by Shri K.Periaswami

pleading therein that he was a regular employee of the

bank since 1-1-1980. He rendered service for 20 years, which

remained satisfactory throughout. On 28.01.98 a charge

sheet was served upon him,which was preceded by his

suspension. He gave a reply to the charge sheet. However

the bank constituted a domestic enquiry. He participated

in enquiry and claimed that no misconduct was committed

by him. The Enquiry Officer submitted a report dated

21-12-98 holding him guilty of charges. There was no

evidence against him, showing that he committed a

misconduct. He had explained the transactions before the

authorities. According to him, his friends and relatives,

4622

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

besides other known persons, while coming to Delhi,

brought drafts instead of cash with them, with a view to

avoid risk of loosing the money in transit. He deposited

those drafts in his accounts or account of his wife,

withdrew the money representing the drafts and handed it

over to the persons, who had brought the draft. According

to him no business was carried out by him, outside scope

of his employment. The Disciplinary Authority awarded

punishment of dismissal to him. His appeal was also

dismissed by the Appellate Authority. The action of the

bank, in dismissing him from service is arbitrary and

uncalled for. He has not committed any act prejudicial to

the interest of the bank. He claims that he may be reinstated

in service with continuity and full back wages.

3. The bank demurs the claim pleading that while

posted as clerk at Foreign Exchange Branch New Delhi,

the claimed opened saving bank accounts No. 3785, 4116

and 4410 his own name and account No.4503 in the name

of his wife Smt.Meena, with his own introduction. He

carried out instructions involving huge turnover running

into crores of rupees, which were beyond the scope of his

employment. There were regular credits to these accounts.

He used to withdraw the amount on the date of credit

entry. His activities led the authorities to suspicion that

he was doing business outside the scope of his

employment. He was arrested by the CBI, for which a wide

publicity was given in the press. The bank received a jolt

to its fair image in the eyes of the public. A charge sheet

was served upon him on 28.9.98. Reply, submitted by the

claimant, was not found satisfactory. A domestic enquiry

was constituted. Due opportunities were given by the

Enquiry Officer to the claimant to defend himself. The

Enquiry Officer recorded findings against the claimant.

The Disciplinary Authority concurred with the Enquiry

Officer and proposed punishment of dismissal from service.

After giving him an opportunity of being heard, the

claimant was dismissed from service on 27-02-1999. The

Appellate Authority also gave him an opportunity of being

head and dismissed his appeal. It is wrong to assert that

the claimant explained those transactions. However he

admitted heavy transactions in his accounts, referred

above. Punishment awarded to the claimant commensurate

to his misconduct. He is not entitled to any relief. His

claim deserves dismissal, hence it may be dismissed, pleads

the bank.

4. Vide order No.Z-22019/6/2007-IR(C-II), New Delhi,

dated 11-02-2008, appropriate Government transferred the

case to Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. II, New

Delhi, for adjudication. Vide order No.Z-22019/6/2007-IR

(C-II), New Delhi, dated 30-03-2011, the case was re-

transferred by the appropriate Government to this Tribunal

for adjudication.

On pleadings of the parties following issues were

settled :

(i) Whether enquiry conducted by the management

was just, fair and proper?

(ii) Whether punishment awarded to the claimant

was proportionate to his misconduct?

(iii) As in terms of reference.

(iv) Relief.

6. On consideration of evidence adduced by the

claimant and documents produced by the bank, the issue

relating to virus of enquiry, which was treated as

preliminary issue, was answered in favour of the bank and

against the claimant, vide order dated 23-09-2011.

7. Arguments on proportionality of punishment were

heard. Shri R.K.Patra, authorized representative, advanced

arguments on behalf of the claimant Shri Rajesh Mahendru,

authorized representative, presented facts on behalf of

the bank. I have given my careful consideration, to the

arguments advanced at the bar and cautiously perused

the record. My findings on issues involved in the

controversy are as follows:

Issue Nos. 2 & 3

8. Prior to introduction of Section 11A of the Act,

adjudicatory powers of the Tribunal were articulated in

Buckingham & Carnatak Company [1951 (2) LLJ 314]. Four

standards were delineated by the Labour Appellate

Tribunal in the above case to render managerial right of

taking disciplinary action vulnerable, namely, (i) where

there is a want of bonafides or (ii) when it is a case of

victimization or unfair labour practice or violation of the

principles of natural justice, or (iii) when there is basic

error of facts, or (iv) when there has been a perverse finding

on the materials. This articulation was adopted by the

Apex Court with slight modification in Indian Iron and

Steel Company Limited [1958 (1) LLJ 260], without any

acknowledgement to the precedent in Buckingham &

Carnatic case (supra), wherein it was ruled that the power

of the management to direct its own internal administration

and discipline was not unlimited and liable to be interfered

with by industrial adjudication when a dispute arises to

see whether termination of services of a workman is

justified and to give appropriate relief. However, it was

announced that the jurisdiction of an Industrial Tribunal

to interfere with the managerial prerogative of taking

disciplinary action is not of appellate nature as the

legislature has not chosen to confer such jurisdiction

upon it. Hence Tribunal could not substitute its own

judgement for that of the management. The Court laid down

that in the following circumstances an industrial

adjudicator can interfere with the disciplinary action taken

by the employer : (1) when there is want of good faith,

(2) when there was victimization or unfair labour practice,

(3) when the management had been guilty of a basic error

or violation of the principles of natural justice, or (4) when

on the materials, the finding was completely baseless or

perverse.

9. Enunciation (1) and (2), referred above, are

addressed to the bona fides of the employer in initiating

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4623

the action and inflicting the punishment, while postulates

(3) and (4) are addressed to domestic enquiry. Therefore,

an employer is required to act bona-fide in initiating

disciplinary action as well as in inflicting the punishment.

In initiating the action the alleged act of misconduct

should not be a ruse for something else, such as the trade

union activities of the workman or employers dislike of

him for some personal reasons. The action should not be

motivated by vindictiveness or ulterior purpose, so as to

smack for victimization or unfair labour practice. Likewise

in the matter of inflicting punishment, the employer should

act fairly. In case punishment awarded is so shockingly

disproportionate to the act of the misconduct, as no

reasonable man would ever impose that itself may lead to

an inference of malafides, victimization or unfair labour

practice. In holding enquiry, the Enquiry Officer must

comply with the rules of natural justice. He must not be a

biased person and give reasonable opportunity to both

sides for being heard. His findings should not be baseless

or perverse.

10. In Ramswarth Sinha (1954 L.A.C. 697) the Labour

Appellate Tribunal recognized the right of the

management to ask for permission to adduce evidence

before the Tribunal to justify its action in a "no enquiry"

case. Following that proposition the Apex Court equated

the cases of "defective enquiry" with "no enquiry" cases

and ruled that in either cases, the Tribunal have jurisdiction

to go into the merits of the case on the basis of evidence

adduced before it by the parties. Reference can be made

to the precedent in Motipur Sugar Factory Pvt. Ltd. [1965

(2) LLJ 162] where the empoyer had held no enquiry at all

before the dismissal and, therefore, adduced evidence to

justify its action before the Tribunal, which decision was

upheld. The Apex Court discarded the plea on behalf of

the workman that since no enquiry at all had been held by

the employer, it had no right to adduce evidence to justify

its stand before the Tribunal. In Ritz Theatre [1962 (II) LLJ

498] it was ruled by the Supreme Court that the Tribunal

would be justified to go to the merits of the case and

decide for itself on the basis of the evidence adduced

whether the charges have indeed been made out. It

announced that it would neither be fair to the management

nor fair to the workman himself in such a case that the

Tribunal should refuse to take the evidence and thereby

drive the management to pass through the whole process

of holding the enquiry all over again. Reference can also

be made to the precedent in Bharat Sugar Mills Ltd. [1961

(11) LLJ 644].

11. In Delhi Cloth and General Mills Company [1972

(1) LLJ 180], Apex Court considered the catena of

decisions over the subject and laid down the following

principles :

"(1) If no domestic enquiry had been held by the

management, or if the management makes it clear

that it does not rely upon any domestic enquiry that

may have been held by it, it is entitled to

straightaway adduce evidence before the Tribunal

justifying its action. The Tribunal is bound to

consider that evidence so adduced before it, on

merits, and give a decision thereon. In such a case,

it is not necessary for the Tribunal to consider the

validity of the domestic enquiry as the employer

himself does not rely on it.

(2) If a domestic enquiry had been held, it is open to

the management to rely upon the domestic enquiry

held by it, in the first instance, and alternatively and

without prejudice to its plea that the enquiry is

proper and binding, simultaneously adduce

additional evidence before the Tribunal justifying

its action. In such a case no inference can be drawn,

without anything more, that the management has

given up the enquiry conducted by it.

(3) When the management relies on the enquiry

conducted by it, and also simultaneously adduces

evidence before the Tribunal, without prejudice to

its plea that the enquiry proceedings are proper, it is

the duty of the Tribunal, in the first instance, to

consider whether the enquiry proceedings

conducted by the management, are valid and proper.

If the Tribunal is satisfied that the enquiry

proceedings have been held properly and are valid,

the question of considering the evidence adduced

before it on merits, no longer survives. It is only

when the holds that the enquiry proceedings have

not been properly held, that it derives jurisdiction

to deal with the merits of the dispute and in such a

case it has to consider the evidence adduced before

it by the management and decide the matter on the

basis of such evidence.

(4) When the domestic enquiry has been held by

the management and the management relies on the

same, it is open to the latter to request the Tribunal

to try the validity of the domestic enquiry as a

preliminary issue and also ask for an opportunity to

adduce evidence before the Tribunal, if the finding

on the preliminary issue is against the management.

However, elaborate and cumbersome the procedure

may be, under such circumstances, it is open to the

Tribunal to deal, in the first instance, as a preliminary

issue the validity of the domestic enquiry. If its

finding on the preliminary issue is in favour of the

management, then no additional evidence need be

cited by the management. But, if the finding on the

preliminary issue is against the management, the

Tribunal will have to give the employer an

opportunity to cite additional evidence and also give

a similar opportunity to the employee to lead

evidence contra, as the request to adduce evidence

4624

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

had been made by the management to the Tribunal

during the course of the proceedings and before the

trial has come to an end. When the preliminary issue

is decided against the management and the latter

leads evidence before the Tribunal, the position,

under such circumstances, will be, that the

management is deprived of the benefit of having the

finding of the domestic tribunal being accepted as

prima facie proof of the alleged misconduct. On the

other hand, the management will have to prove, by

adducing proper evidence, that the workman is guilty

of misconduct and that the action taken by it is

proper. It will not be just and fair either to the

management or to the workman that the Tribunal

should refuse to take evidence and thereby ask the

management to take a further application, after

holding a proper enquiry, and deprive the workman

of the benefit of the Tribunal itself being satisfied,

on evidence adduced before it, that he was or was

not guilty of the alleged misconduct.

(5)

The management has got a right to attempt to

sustain its order by adducing independent evidence

before the Tribunal. But the management should

avail itself of the said opportunity by making a

suitable request to the Tribunal before the

proceedings are closed. If no such opportunity has

been available of, or asked for by the management,

before the proceedings are closed, the employer can

make no grievance that the Tribunal did not provide

such an opportunity. The Tribunal will have before

it only the enquiry proceedings and it has to decide

whether the proceedings have been held properly

and the findings recorded therein are also proper.

(6) If the employer relies only on the domestic

enquiry and does not simultaneously lead additional

evidence or ask for an opportunity during the

pendency of the proceedings to adduce such

evidence, the duty of the Tribunal is only to consider

the validity of the domestic enquiry as well as the

finding recorded therein and decide the matter. If

the Tribunal decides that the domestic enquiry has

not been held properly, it is not its function to invite

suo moto the employer to adduce evidence before it

to justify the action taken by it.

(7) The above principles apply to the proceedings

before the Tribunal, which have come before it either

on a reference under Section 10 or by way of an

application under Section 33 of the Act”.

12. Keeping in view the proposition laid by the

Apex Court in Delhi Cloth and General Mills Company

(supra), the Parliament inserted Section 11-A in the Act,

which came into force w.e.f. 15th of December, 1971. In the

statement of objects and reasons for inserting Section 11-A,

it was stated:

"(1) In Indian Iron and Steel Company Limited and

Another Vs. Their Workmen (AIR 1958 S.C. 130 at

p.138), the Supreme Court, while considering the

Tribunal's power to interfere with the management's

decision to dismiss, discharge or terminate the

services of a workman, has observed that in case of

dismissal on misconduct, the Tribunal does not act

as a court of appeal and substitute its own judgment

for that of the management and that the Tribunal

will interfere only when there is want of good faith,

victimization, unfair labour practice, etc., on the part

of the management.

(2) The International Labour Organisation, in its

recommendation (No.119) concerning 'Termination

of employment at the initiative of the employer'

adopted in June 1963, has recommended that a

worker aggrieved by the termination of his

employment should be entitled to appeal against

the termination among others, to a neutral body such

as an arbitrator, a court, an arbitration committee or

a similar body and that the neutral body concerned

should be empowered to examine the reasons given

in the termination of employment and the other

circumstances relating to the case and to render a

decision on the justification of the termination. The

International Labour Organisation has further

recommended that the neutral body should be

empowered (if it finds that the termination of

employment was unjustified) to order that the worker

concerned, unless reinstated with unpaid wages,

should be paid adequate compensation or afforded

some other relief.

(3) In accordance with these recommendations, it

is considered that the Tribunal’s power in an

adjudication proceeding relating to discharge or

dismissal of a workman should not be limited and

that the Tribunal should have the power, in cases

wherever necessary to set aside the order of

discharge or dismissal and direct reinstatement of

the workman on such terms and conditions, if any,

as it thinks fit or give such other reliefs to the

workman including the award of any lesser

punishment in lieu of discharge or dismissal as the

circumstances of the case may require. For this

purpose, a new Section 11-A is proposed to be

inserted in the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947...”

13. After insertion of Section 11-A, the Apex Court

summed up the law in the case of Firestone Tyre and

Rubber Company [1973 (1) LLJ 278] in the following

propositions:

‘‘(1) The right to take disciplinary action and to

decide upon the quantum of punishment are mainly

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4625

managerial functions, but if a dispute is referred to a

Tribunal, the latter has power to see if action of the

employer is justified.

(2) Before imposing the punishment, as employer is

expected to conduct a proper enquiry in accordance

with the provisions of the 4 Standing Orders, if

applicable, and principles of natural justice. The

enquiry should not be an empty formality.

(3) When a proper enquiry has been held by an

employer, and the finding of misconduct is a plausible

conclusion flowing from the evidence, adduced at

the said enquiry, the Tribunal has no jurisdiction to

sit in judgement over the decision of the employer

as an appellate body. The interference with the

decision of the employer will be justified only when

the findings arrived at in the enquiry are perverse or

the management is guilty of victimization, unfair

labour practice or mala fide.

(4) Even if no enquiry has been held by an employer

or if the enquiry held by him is found to be defective,

the Tribunal in order to satisfy itself about the

legality and validity of the order, had to give an

opportunity to the employer and employee to adduce

evidence before it. It is open to the employer to

adduce evidence for the first time justifying his

action, and it is open to the employee to adduce

evidence contra.

(5) The effect of an employer not holding an enquiry

is that the Tribunal would not have to consider only

whether there was a prima facie case. On the other

hand, the issue about the merits of the impugned

order of dismissal or discharge is at large before the

Tribunal and the latter, on the evidence adduced

before it, has to decide for itself whether the

misconduct alleged is proved. In such cases, the

point about the exercise of managerial functions does

not arise at all. A case of defective enquiry stands

on the same footing as no enquiry.

(6) The Tribunal gets jurisdiction to consider the

evidence placed before it for the first time in

justification of the action taken only, if no enquiry

has been held or after the enquiry conducted by an

employer is found to be defective.

(7) It has never been recognized that the Tribunal

should straightaway without anything more, direct

reinstatement of a dismissed or discharged

employee, once it is found that no domestic enquiry

has been held or the said enquiry is found to be

defective.

(8) An employer, who wants to avail himself of the

opportunity of adducing evidence for the first time

before the Tribunal to justify his action, should ask

for it at the appropriate stage. If such an opportunity

is asked for, the Tribunal has no power to refuse.

The giving of an opportunity to an employer to

adduce evidence for the first time before the Tribunal

is in the interest of both the management and the

employee and to enable the Tribunal itself to be

satisfied about the alleged misconduct.

(9) Once the misconduct is proved either in the

enquiry conducted by an employer or by the

evidence placed before a Tribunal for the first time,

punishment imposed cannot, be interfered with by

the Tribunal except in cases where the punishment

is so harsh as to suggest victimization.

(10) In a particular case, after setting aside the order

of dismissal, whether a workman should be

reinstated or paid compensation is, as held by this

Court in The Management of Panitole Tea Estate

Vs. The workmen, within the judicial decision of a

Labour Court or Tribunal".

14. Jurisdiction to interfere with the punishment is

also not confined to the case where punishment is

shockingly disproportionate to the act of the mis-conduct.

The Tribunal has power of substituting its own measure

of punishment in place of managerial wisdom. Change in

legal position, post introduction of Section 11A of the Act

has been effectively summarized in the case of

Ambassador Sky Chef (1996 Lab. I.C. 299) wherein High

Court of Bombay observed that the section gives

specifically two fold powers to an industrial adjudicator:

firstly, it is a virtual power of appeal against the findings

of fact made by the Enquiry Officer in his report with regard

to the adequacy of the evidence and conclusion on facts,

and secondly, and far more important, it is the power of re-

appraisal of quantum of punishment. Now no restriction

lies on an industrial adjudicator to interfere with the enquiry

only on four grounds, referred above. However, wide

discretionary powers with the adjudicator are to be

exercised in judicial and judicious manner before it

interferes with the order of mis-conduct or punishment.

15.With this prelude in mind, I would revert to factual

matrix of the controversy. Claimant projects that case

registered against him, was closed by the CBI since there

was no material warranting his trial. It has been agitated

on his behalf that order dated 05-02-04, passed by Special

Judge, CBI, go to establish that he had not committed any

offence. Perusal of that order make it clear that the Special

Judge, C.B.I. accepted the closure report, since there was

no material warranting trial of the claimant. Trial commences

when material is collected to project that a cognizable

offence is committed by some one. Therefore the order of

the Special Judge projects a situation that there was no

material for trial of the claimant for an offence of possessing

asserts dis-proportionate to known sources of his income.

Question for consideration would be as to whether

4626

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

misconduct is synonymous with a crime. For an answer to

this proposition it would be appropriate to know as to

what term ‘misconduct’ means, The concept of misconduct

is a general concept and is not related to relationship of

master and servant only. The dictionary meaning of the

word 'misconduct' are: "improper behaviour, intentional

wrong doing or deliberate violation of a rule of standard

of behaviour. "Misconduct is a transgression of some

established and definite rule of action, where no discretion

is left except what necessity may demand: it is violation of

definite law, a forbidden act and differs from carelessness.

It comprises of positive acts and not mere neglect or

failure.

16. Under Indian Penal Code and other special and

local laws some acts or omissions are offences for which a

person can be punished by the sovereign power of the

State. These offences or acts are considered to be

prejudicial to the interest of the society in general and,

therefore, they are prohibited by law. There are, however,

various other organizations such as professional bodies,

educational institutions, clubs,corporations etc. and

anyone who wants to be admitted to such bodies, by being

member or otherwise, is also required to act under certain

rules arid remain subject to certain discipline. If he does

anything in violation of rules, regulations, or any law

inconsistent with his position as a member of that society,

then he is liable to lose advantage and facilities of the

association with that society or organization. Any such

act is, therefore, generally called misconduct. Primary

meaning of the word 'misconduct' is bad management, mis-

management and malfeasance or culpable neglect of an

official in regard to his office. Both in law and in ordinary

parlance, the term misconduct usually implies an act done

willfully with a wrong intention and as applied to

professional acts, even though such acts are not inherently

wrongful, it means also dereliction of or deviation from

duty. Even assuming that a particular act is negligence

and not misconduct, such a negligence which amounts to

dereliction of or deviation from duty cannot be excused.

See In re:-Mehboob Alikhan (AIR 1958 AP 116).

17. In N.M. Roshan Umar Karim and Co.(AIR 1936

Mad. 508) following three different meaning of the word

'misconduct' were given :

‘‘(a) Misconduct is not established by proving even

culpable negligence. It is something opposed to

accident or negligence and is doing of something

which the doer knows to be wrong or which he does

recklessly not careing what the result would be.

(b) Misconduct is distinguished from accident and

is not far from negligence-not only gross and

culpable negligence and involves that a person

misconducts himself when it is wrong conduct on

his part, in the existing circumstances to do or to fail

or omit to do a particular thing or to persist in the

act, failure or omission or acting with carelessness.

It is incorrect that a misconduct only refers to acts

of gross or culpable negligence and nor mere

negligence.

(c) Misconduct does not ordinarily covers acts of

negligence. The test of misconduct is not what a

reasonable man would have done in the

circumstances. It means that servant is guilty of

something which was inconsistent with the conduct

expected of him by the rules of the company’’. Above

three meanings were quoted by the Apex Court with

approval in Shiv Nath AIR 1965 SC 1666).

18. Whether mere negligence is a misconduct or not

will depend upon the nature of negligence and the

requirement of care which the employee was obliged to

use on the nature of services he was expected to perform.

Misconduct could be of three kinds :

(i) technical misconduct which leaves no trail of

indiscipline,

(ii) misconduct resulting in damage to the employer's

property which might be compensated by

forfeiture of gratuity or part thereof, and

(ii) serious misconduct such as acts of violence

against the management or other employee or

riotous of disorderly behaviour in or near the

place .of employment, which though not directly

causing damage, is conductive to grave

indiscipline.

19. In Ram Singh (1992 Lab. IC 2391) the Apex Court

observed that though the expression "misconduct" is "not

capable of precise definition, its dereliction receives its

connotation from the context, the delinquency in its

performance and its effect on the discipline and the nature

of duty. It may involve moral turpitude, it must be improper

or wrong behaviour, unlawful behaviour, willful in

character, forbidden act, a transgression of established

and definite rule of action or code of conduct but not mere

error of judgement, carelessness or negligence in

performance of duty, the act complained of bears forbidden

quality or character. Its ambit has to be construed with

reference to the subject matter and the context wherein

the term occurs, regard being had to the scope of the

statue and the public purpose it seeks to serve."

20. In industrial law, the word 'misconduct' has

acquired a specific connotation. In Shalimar Rope Works

Ltd. (1953 L.A.C. 584) the Labour Appellate Tribunal laid

down the criteria for determination as to whether an act

would be misconduct, viz. the act (i) is inconsistent with

the fulfillment of the express or implied conditions of

service, or (ii) is directly linked with the general relationship

of employer and employee or (iii) has a direct connection

with the contentment or comfort of the men at work, or

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4627

(iv) has a material bearing, on the smooth and efficient

working of the concern. If the answer to any of these

criteria is in affirmative, the action in question would

amount to an act of misconduct. In industrial law, there

two kinds of misconduct, namely; (I) gross or major

misconduct which justify punishment of dismissal or

discharge, and (II) minor misconduct which do not justify

punishment of dismissal or discharge but may call for lesser

punishment. See also Caltex India Ltd. (1966 (2) LLJ 137).

21. An act done willfully with a wrong intention would

amount to misconduct. Intention can be said to

consciously or willfully or deliberately doing an act which

it is known or foreseen or appreciated or realized, will as a

probable, perhaps highly probable, perhaps morally

certain, consequence, expose the victim to the risk of peril

of death or grievous bodily harm, even though the actor

may not wish or desire the result to ensue, may be certain

that it will ensue, or may have wanton disregard or

indifference as to whether it will nor not. Intention involves

foresight or knowledge of the probable or likely

consequences of injury, plus the desire or purpose or

object or end to do an act which will bring those

consequences about. Foresight or knowledge of the

probable or likely consequences does not or may not,

itself suffice to constitute intention, but it is naturally

very strong evidence of such an intention. Foresight or

knowledge is the best basis to find the requisite intention

proved and this must normally be expected to follow.

22. "Good faith' plays an important part in law of

crimes and its presence is ordinarily a sufficient answer to

a charge of criminality in many cases. Good faith is defined

in positive aspect by section 3(22) of the General Clauses

Act, 1897, which definition is extracted thus:

"3.(22) A thing shall be deemed to be done in 'good

faith' where it is in fact done honestly, whether it is done

negligently or not",

Element of honesty, introduced by the above

definition, is not present in the definition given in the

Penal Code. Negative definition of the phrase is given in

section 52 of the Penal Code, which runs thus:

"52. Nothing is said to be done or believed in 'good

faith' which is done or believed without care and

attention".

23. As defined by the Penal Code, definition of

phrase 'good faith' has no reference to the moral element

of honesty and right motive which are involved in popular

significance of 'good faith', defined by General Clauses

Act. To establish good faith under the penal law, it is

necessary to prove that the person pleading good faith

acted with due care and attention and an honest blunder

cannot be protected, without establishing the exercise of

due care and attention. The plea of good faith may be

negatived on the ground of recklessness indicative of want

of due care and attention if the imputation in question,

have been made as categorical statements of facts.

However law does not exact the same degree of care and

attention from all persons. It varies with the position they

occupy. In this sense, the question of 'good faith' is always

question of fact to be determined in accordance with the

proved facts and circumstances of each case.

24. The 'due' care required must depend upon the

nature of the act, its magnitude and importance and the

facility a person has for the exercise of care and attention.

It does not constitute 'good faith' necessarily because the

person making the imputation believed it to be true. Due

care and attention imply a genuine effort to reach the truth,

and not the ready acceptance of an ill natured belief. A

surgeon working in his surgery would be judged by a

different standard from that applicable to a surgeon in the

field. But where a quack unskilled in surgery performs an

operation which even a trained surgeon seldom dares, he

cannot be accredited with good faith, if his patient trusting

him succumbs to his operation.

25. The circumstances that operate on the exercise

of care and attention are so varied and variable that it is

not possible to fix a general standard by which the

presence or absence of 'good faith' may, in any case, be

tested. But at the same time, in such cases, it is always

permissible to argue ex post facto; that is to say, it may be

shown that there was a want of good faith' because there

was absence of the requisite care and caution. On the

other hand, a person relying upon ''load faith' may show

that he had taken the necessary care and caution, and

that, therefore, his act was done in good faith. As observed

by the Law Commission in its First Report : ‘He will be

required to prove that his conduct was such as to lead

fairly to the inference that he acted in good faith as alleged.

It is true that he cannot prove directly what was in his

mind, but he may be able to prove facts by which this may

be sufficiently manifested". To satisfy the Court of his

good faith, he must show at least that he acted advisedly

and that he had reasonable ground prima facie for believing

that he ought to do what he did.

26. In order to establish belief in good faith, a

person's simple belief in good faith that circumstances are

such and such, ought not to be sufficient: there ought to

be sufficiently strong and just ground for his belief. Belief

must have a foundation and that must be shown. Where a

person acts with thoughtless precipitancy, without making

sufficient inquiries and jumping to a conclusion upon

materials wholly unjustifiable, it cannot be said that he

had exercised good faith.

27. As a person, acting in good faith, is excepted

from criminality, presence of good faith in each case must

depend upon the circumstances which alone entitle a

person to exemption from criminal responsibility. The

burden lies on the delinquent to prove that he acted with

4628

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

good faith. The question of good faith must be considered

with reference to the position of the delinquent and the

circumstances under which he acted. The law does not

expect the same care and attention from all persons

regardless of the position they occupy.

28. As projected above, order of the Special Judge

accepting the closure report and forming an opinion that

there was no material to warrant trial of the claimant would

not espouse his cause. As brought over the record,

claimant opened saving bank accounts No. 3785 on

31-7-91, account number 4116 on 29-6-92 and account No.

4410 on 4-3-94. Saving bank account No.4503 was opened

in the name of his wife on 20-07-94, with his introduction.

Thus it has come over the record that various accounts

were opened by the claimant in his name as well as in the

name of his wife, with a view to route transactions involving

huge turnover, which fact is sufficient to conclude that he

was involved in business beyond the scope of his

employment. The claimant indulged in such activities,

without permission of his employer. When turnover worth

crores took place in those accounts, authorities concerned

with law and order became suspicious and arrested the

claimant. His arrest got wide publicity in the media and

image of the bank was tarnished. Claimant could not refute

that his dealings in the aforesaid accounts put his

employer's name to disregard.

29. An employee is expected to promote interest of

his employer in connection with the job for which he was

engaged. Contract of an employment engrafts a stipulation

that the employee should serve his mater with good faith

and fidelity. Thus it was expected of the claimed to inform

his employer in respect of the bank drafts, which he routed

through the aforesaid four accounts. He opted not to

inform his employer in that regard. Since there were heavy

turnovers in the aforesaid accounts, wherein crores of

rupees were involved, this proposition is conclusive of

the fact that of the claimant indulged in business beyond

the scope of his employment. For business activities he

never took his employer in confidence, nor obtained

permission in that regard. Further more activities of the

claimant had tarnished the image of his employer. His acts

and conduct proved detrimental to fair image of the bank.

Consequently it is clear that through his aforesaid acts

the claimant acted prejudicial to the interest of his employer

and committed gross misconduct. Financial loss is not

only criteria to be taken into account, while awarding

punishment for a misconduct. The misconduct committed

by the claimants, is serious one and penalty for such

misconduct should be harsher one. Such an employee

cannot be retained in service.

30. Question would arise as to whether punishment

of dismissal is the only appropriate penalty for the

misconduct. As detailed above, Special Judge, CBI,

recorded as opinion that there was no material warranting

trial of the claimant for an offence of possessing assets

disproportionate to known sources of his income.

However it is clear that commercial angle of such acts

cannot be ruled out. The claimant was moved with an idea

to gain out of those acts, which were done by him beyond

the scope of his employment. Further more he put

reputation of his employer to stake and tarnished fair image

of the bank. These facts, compled with his more than 20

years unblemished service, motive me to comment that

punishment of dismissal from service can neither be called

proportionate nor appropriate to his misconduct. This

punishment is excessive to the acts of his misconduct.

Considering all facts and circumstances projected by the

claimant, I am of the view that indulgence by the Tribunal

is called for. Therefore the Tribunal holds that punishment

lesser than dismissal is to be awarded to the claimant,

without making the bank to retain him in service. Hence

punishment of discharge simpleciter from service would

meet the ends of justice. This punishment would relive

the bank from retaining the claimant in service and the

claimant would receive his retrial benefits. This issues are,

therefore, answered accordingly.

Relief

31. In view of the aforesaid discussion it is crystal

clear that the claimant cannot seek reinstatement in the

service of the bank. Relief of lesser punishment than are

awarded to him is granted. Consequently punishment of

discharge simpleciter from service is awarded to the

claimant, which will entitle him to claim retrial benefits. An

award is accordingly passed. It be sent to the appropriate

Govt. for publication

Dr. R. K.YADAV, Presiding Officer

Dated: 12-12-2012

ubZ fnYyh] 8 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1636-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj cSad vkWiQ

bf.M;k ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds

chp vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k

lhthvkbZVh@,ylh@vkj@ua- 84@89) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks

dsUæh; ljdkj dks 27&06&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y&12012@736@88&Mh&2(,)&vkbZ vkj (ch&II)º

lqefr ldykuh] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 8th July, 2013

S.O. 1636.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (CGIT/LC/R/No.

84/89) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour

Court, Jabalpur now as shown in the Annexure in the

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4629

Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of Bank of India and their workman, which

was received by the Central Government on 27-6-2013.

[No. L- 12012/736/88-D-2(A)-IR (B-II)]

SUMATI SAKLANI, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

JABALPUR

No. CGIT/LC/R/84/89

SHRI R.B.PATLE, Presiding Officer

Assistant General Secretary,

Madhya Pradesh Bank Employees Association,

Singhal Bhawan,

IInd Floor, Gwalior

. . . Workman/Union

Versus

Regional Manager,

Bank of India,E-2, 71,

Arera Colony, Gwalior

. . . Management

AWARD

Passed on this 11th day of June, 2013

1. As per letter dated 2-5-89 by the Government of

India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is

received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under

Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No. L-12012/

736/88/D-2(A)-IR (B-II). The dispute under reference

relates to:

“Whether the order No. GWL/PERS dated

14-10-86 issued by the Manager, Bank of India to

Shri V.K.Bahal advising him to take over the charge

of Head cashier of the Branch in place of Shri

J.K.Sharma promoted as Officer can be treated as an

order for his permanent charge of Head Cashier?

Whether the action of the Branch Manager, Gwalior

Branch in verbally withdrawing the charge of Head

Cashiers post from Shri V.K.Bahal w.e.f. 14-1-87 can

be treated as valid and correct? Further whether the

action of the management in awarding the

punishment of stoppage of two increments vide order

No. RB/PERS/IL/114 dated 27-2-87 in pending

chargesheet for more than for and half years old

during the course of pendency of conciliation

proceedings can be treated as unfair labour practice?

If the action of the management of Bank of India is

found to be unjustified to what benefits Shri

V.K.Bahal is entitled?”

2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to

the parties. Ist party workman submitted statement of claim.

I find that the statement of claim submitted by Ist party is

full of repetition. The substance of the contentions of Ist

party is that he was appointed as cashier cum clerk from

14-8-1973, He was transferred to Shivpuri on 6-12-1975 and

then to Gwalior and other places. He was active member of

Union at different level. That Head Cashier J.K.Sharma was

promoted. His post is vacant. The charge of cashier was

temporary assigned to him. According to the Ist party

workman, the charge of cashier remained with Senior most

cashier as per the rules and regulations. He was not given

charge of Head cashier permanently. The said act of the

management is alleged to be illegal. That he had made

correspondence with the higher authorities in that regard.

Despite of it, the charge of Head cashier was not given to

him. He further alleged that the chargesheet was issued to

him despite of the conciliation proceedings were pending.

Punishment withholding increment was imposed against

him. The said act of the management was illegal is in

contravention of Section 33(1) and (3) of I.D.Act. He submits

that the enquiry conducted against him was in violation of

principles of natural justice. The allegations could not be

proved against him. The Enquiry Officer was partial, bias,

the findings were perverse. Principles of natural justice

were not followed. Prior permission was not taken from

ALC as provided under Section 33(1) & (3) of I.D.Act. On

above contentions, the workman prays that the order dated

14-10-86 issued by management is illegal. Direction be

issued to give permanent charge of Head Cashier to him.

That punishment of imposing two punishments be set aside.

3. IInd party submitted Written Statement and

additional Written Statement denying the contentions of

the Ist party workman at Page 30/1 to 30/7. It is contented

that no permanent charge of Head cashier can be handed

over as claimed by Ist party. The chargesheet was legally

issued to the workman Enquiry was conducted following

principles of natural justice. The Disciplinary Authority

found charges against workman are proved. The

punishment withholding two increments is imposed. IInd

party prayed for rejection of reliefs prayed by workman.

4. Ist party filed rejoinder to the reply filed by the

IInd party and reiterated his earlier contentions.

5. Considering pleadings on record, the points which

arise for my consideration and determination are as under.

My findings are recorded against each of them for the

reasons as below :—

(i)

Whether the order dated

In Negative

14-10-86 issued by the Manager,

Bank of India to Shri V.K.Bahal

advising him to take over the

charge of Head cashier of the

Branch in place of Shri J.K.

Sharma promoted as Officer

can be treated as an order for

his permanent charge of Head

Cashier?

4630

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(ii)

Whether the action of the

In

Branch Manager, Gwalior

Affirmative

Branch in verbally withdrawing

the charge of Head Cashiers

post from Shri V.K. Bahal

w.e.f. 14-1-87 is legal?

(iii)

Whether the action of the

Not proved

management in awarding

the punishment of stoppage

of two increments during the

course of pendency of

conciliation proceedings can

be treated as unfair labour

practice?

(iv)

If not, what relief the workman

Relief

is entitled to?”

prayed by

workman

are rejected.

REASONS

6. The dispute under reference relates to three

questions— Ist— Whether the order dated 14-10-86 issued

by the Manager amounts to permanent charge of Head

Cashier, IInd—Whether the withdrawal of said charge as

per order dated 14-1-87 is illegal?, IIIrd—Whether the

punishment of withholding 2 increments is illegal. All those

questions are referred by this reference. Though elaborate

pleadings submitted in statement of claim and rejoinder

and various applications, the workman has failed to adduce

any evidence. In absence of evidence on behalf of the

workman, his claim is not substantiated. The management

has filed affidavit of evidence of witness Shri P.C. Saxena.

To be precise, the management’s witness Shri P.C. Saxena

has stated on oath that Manager allowed charge of Head

Cashier temporarily to Shri V.K. Bahal in view of his security

at branch. Manager of Bank could not have assigned such

duties on permanent basis to anybody because he was not

competent to do so. That the order dated 14-10-86 assigning

duties on temporary basis and not on permanent basis.

That Shri Bahal was to be assigned the temporary duties of

special Assistant. That Shri Bahal did not accept the duties

of Special Assistant, the Manager had to assign the said

duties to some one else. He has further stated that

disciplinary action for gross misconduct was pending

against Shri Bahal as per chargesheet dated 12-7-1982. As

such Shri Bahal was not eligible for assignment of Head

Cashier’s duties on permanent basis. The evidence of

management’s witness remained unchallenged.

7. The witness of management has further stated on

oath that chargesheet dated 30-8-83 contains three charges

against Mr. Bahal. He was given benefit of doubt with

regard to Charge No. 2. Charge No.1 is proved. The witness

denied that any prejudice is caused to Mr. Bahal. Principles

of natural justice was followed. The evidence of

management’s witness remained unchallenged. Workman

failed to adduce evidence. For above reasons, claim of

workman is not substantiated by evidence. Therefore his

claim cannot be upheld. For the above reasons I answer

Point No. l in Negative, Point No. 2 in Affirmative and Point

No. 3 in Negative.

8. In the result, award is passed as under:—

(i)

The order dated 14-10-86 issued by the Manager,

Bank of India to Shri V.K. Bahal advising him to

take over the charge of Head Cashier of the

Branch in place of Shri J.K. Sharma promoted as

Officer cannot be treated as an order for his

permanent charge of Head Cashier.

(ii)

Order dated 14-1-1987 in withdrawing charge of

Head Cashier is valid.

(iii)

Punishment of withholding of two increments is

legal.

(iv)

Reliefs prayed by workman are rejected.

R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 8 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1637-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj bafM;u

vksojlht cSad ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa

ds chp vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k

113@2004) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 3&7&2013

dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y&12012@76@2004&vkbZ vkj (ch&II)º

lqefr ldykuh] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 8th July, 2013

S.O. 1637.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (I.D. No. 113/2004)

of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour

Court, Hyderabad now as shown in the Annexure in the

Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of Indian Overseas Bank and their workman,

which was received by the Central Government on

3-7-2013.

[No. L- 12012/76/2004-IR (B-II)]

SUMATI SAKLANI, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM -LABOUR COURT

AT HYDERABAD

PRESENT:

Smt. M. Vijaya Lakshmi, Presiding Officer

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4631

Dated the 5th day of June, 2013

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 113/2004

BETWEEN

Sri K.V. Venu,

R/o H.No. 2-5-57, Old Gadi Road,

Kamareddy, Nizamabad.

….Petitioner

AND

The Manager,

Indian Overseas Bank,

Kamareddy Branch,

Nizamabad.

….Respondent

APPEARANCES :

For the Petitioner

:

M/s. M. Venkataswamy, T.

Hanumantha Reddy and

Madhusudhan Reddy,

Advocates

For the Respondent :

M/s. A. Krishnam Raju,

G.D. Kumar, G.V.N. Babu,

N.P. Rao, A.B.S. Reddy,

N.V. Kumar and T. Singaiah,

Advocates.

AWA RD

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its

order No. L- 12012/76/2004-IR (B-II) dated 18.8.2004 referred

the following dispute under section 10(1)(d) of the I.D.

Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal between the

management of Indian Overseas Bank and their workman

Sri K.V. Venu. The term of reference is,

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the General Manager, Indian

Overseas Bank, Central Office, Chennai in imposing

the punishment of discharge from service on Shri

K.V. Venu, Ex-Clerk/Shroff/Godown Keeper w.e.f.

10-9-1999 is justified or not? If not, what relief

terminated worker is entitled for ?”

The reference is numbered in this Tribunal as I.D.

No. 113/2004 and notices were issued to the parties.

2. Petitioner has filed claim statement stating therein

that he was appointed as messenger at Nizamabad Branch

of Respondent on 25.3.1983 and subsequently promoted

as Clerk/Shop/Godown Keeper in Nizamabad District. While

he was working as Cashier at Kamareddy Branch,

Respondent bank placed the Petitioner under suspension

pending enquiry vide proceedings dated 8-7-1998 alleging

that he had committed certain acts of commission and

omission which are prejudicial to the interest of the bank.

Charge-sheet was issued with him and Petitioner submitted

his explanation denying allegations levelled against him,

requesting that he should be exonerated from the charges.

An enquiry was conducted which is to be vitiated due to

non-observances of principles of natural justice. Hence,

this petition.

3. Respondent management has filed counter

statement stating therein that Petitioner Sri K.V. Venu while

working as Clerk/Shroff/Godown Keeper at Kamareddy

branch had misappropriated various remittances tendered

to him on various dates by SB account holders of the

branch, amount totalling to Rs. 98,250/-. Petitioner was

suspended from service on 8.7.98 and a charge sheet was

served on him dated 15.9.1998.

4. It is further submitted that Petitioner submitted

his explanation denying the charges. Enquiry was held,

management examined two witnesses and 31 documents

were marked. Though opportunity was provided Petitioner

had not examined witnesses on his behalf and produced

only one document as defence exhibit. He was extended

the benefit of interpreter by appointing Sri Nagaprasada

Rao, Special cadre Assistant as his interpreter as he stated

that he did not know English. Petitioner has chosen not to

cross examine the management witnesses. There was no

violation of principles of natural justice. Petitioner has not

submitted his written brief denying the charges and also

not submitted his comments to the written brief submitted

by the Presenting Officer. Enquiry proceeding were

conducted in a proper and fair manner holding the principles

of natural justice. Therefore, Petitioner was rightly

discharged from bank’s service as such, Petition is liable to

be dismissed.

5. Both parties have filed their respective documents.

Order has been passed on 15.11.2011 holding domestic

enquiry conducted in this case as valid.

6. Case stands posted for arguments. Petitioner as

well as Respondent are called absent. No representation

for either party. Inspite of giving fair opportunity they are

not showing any interest in the proceedings. No evidence

is also adduced on record either by way of marking

documents.

7. In the circumstances, taking that Petitioner is not

interested in the proceedings, petition is dismissed.

Award passed accordingly. Transmit.

Dictated to Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant

transcribed by her and corrected by me on this the 5th day

of June, 2013.

M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI , Presiding Officer

4632

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for

Witnesses examined for the

the Petitioner

Respondent

NIL

NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

ubZ fnYyh] 8 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1638-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj ;wdks cSad ds

çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/ esa

fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je

U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k lhthvkbZVh@,ylh@vkj@

22@99) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 3&7&2013

dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y&12012@86@98&vkbZ vkj (ch&II)º

lqefr ldykuh] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 8th July, 2013

S.O. 1638.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (CGIT/LC/R/No.

22/99) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour

Court, Jabalpur now as shown in the Annexure in the

Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of UCO Bank and their workman, which was

received by the Central Government on 3-7-2013.

[No. L- 12012/86/98-IR-(B-II)]

SUMATI SAKLANI, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

JABALPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/R/22/99

Presiding Officer : SHRI R.B.PATLE

Shri Chakradari Parate,

387, Vaibhav Gaikwad House,

Ganesh Nagar,

Nagpur

. . . Workman

Versus

The Asstt. General Manager,

UCO Bank, Zonal Officer,

E-5, Arera Colony,

Bhopal

. . . Management

AWARD

Passed on this 17th day of June, 2013

1. As per letter dated 4-12-1998 by the Government

of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is

received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under

Section 10 of I.D. Act, 1947 as per Notification No. L-

12012/86/98-IR(B-II). The dispute under reference relates

to:

“Whether the action of the management of Asstt.

General Manager, UCO Bank in terminating the

services of Shri Chakradari Parate w.e.f. 26-4-97 is

justified? If not, what relief the workman is entitled

to?”

2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to

the parties. 1st party workman did not appear and file

Statement of claim.

3. Management filed exparte Written Statement. It is

submitted that 1st party workman Chakradhary Parate was

served with chargesheet dated 21-1-94 under Clause 19.5(j)

and 19.5(d) of the Bipartite Settlement dated 19-10-66. That

the 1st party workman working as clerk/officiating Teller in

the Bank at Budhwara Extention counter attached to

Marwari Road, Bhopal Branch mis-utilised Banks funds

causing wrongful loss to the Bank and other charges. He

has committed serious irregularities. The charges were

substantiated by documentary evidence. The delinquent

did not appear in the Departmental Enquiry. The Enquiry

Officer submitted his report that the charges were proved.

Considering the report of Enquiry Officer, letter dated

12-4-97 was issued proposing to impose punishment. 1st

party workman remained absent. Considering gravity of

charges, 1st party workman was dismissed. The workman

was also prosecuted by CBI. He was convicted for different

offences including Section 13(2)r/w13(1)(d) imposed 1 year

RI and find of Rs.1000 in each count and in default of

payment of find further 3 months RI in each count. IInd

party prayed for rejection of relief claimed by workman.

4. Considering pleadings on record, the points which

arise for my consideration and determination are as under.

My findings are recorded against each of them for the

reasons as below :—

(i)

Whether the action of the

In Affirmative

management of Asstt. General

Manager, UCO Bank in

terminating the services of

Shri Chakradari Parate w.e.f.

26-4-97 is legal?

(ii)

If so, to what relief the

Relief prayed by

workman is entitled to?

workman is

rejected.

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4633

REASONS

5. Though 1st party workman challenged his

termination of his service, he has failed to file Statement of

Claim. He has not participated in the reference, no evidence

is adduced by him to substantiate in any of the ground to

establish that his termination from service is illegal. The

management’s witness Satish Kumar in his affidavit of

evidence has stated that Departmental Enquiry was

conducted and charges about mis-appropriation of the

amount causing loss to the Bank were proved. That Ist

party workman was also convicted for offence under Section

13(2) and 13(1)(d) of PC Act. The copy of final order is

produced. The evidence of witness remained unchallenged.

I do not find reason to disbelieve the evidence of

management’s witness. From evidence discussed above, it

is clear that the termination of service of Ist party workman

Shri Ganesh was as per the report received from Enquiry

Officer. The charges were proved. The termination cannot

be said illegal. Therefore I record my finding on Point No.1

in Affirmative.

6. In the result, award is passed as under:-

(1)

The action of the management of Asstt. General

Manager, UCO Bank in terminating the services

of Shri Chakradari Parate w.e.f . 26-4-97 is legal.

(2)

Relief prayed by 1st party workman are rejected.

R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 8 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1639-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj cSad vkWiQ

bf.M;k ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds

chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k

lhthvkbZVh@,ylh@vkj@3@89) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh;

ljdkj dks 26&04&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y&12012@428@88&Mh&2(,)&vkbZ vkj (ch&II)º

lqefr ldykuh] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 8th July, 2013

S.O. 1639.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (CGIT/LC/R/

3/89) of the Central Government Labour Court, Jabalpur

now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute

between the employers in relation to the management of

Bank of India and their workman, which was received by

the Central Government on 26-4-2013.

[No. L- 12012/428/88-D-2(A)-IR (B-II)]

SUMATI SAKLANI, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

JABALPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/R/3/89

Presiding Officer : SHRI R.B.PATLE

Shri Santosh Kumar Malviya,

Ex.Clerk-cum-cashier,

Bank of India, PO Karhi,

Tehsil Maheshwar,

Pin- 450220

. . .Workman

Versus

Regional Manager,

Bank of India, Khandwa Region,

12, Anand Nagar,

Khandwa

. . . Management

AWARD

Passed on this 8th day of April 2013

1. As per letter dated 3-1-89 by the Government

of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is

received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under

Section -10 of I.D. Act, 1947 as per Notification No.L-12012/

428/88/-D-2(A). The dispute under reference relates to:

“ Whether the action of the management of Bank of

India in dismissing from service Shri S.K.Malviya is

justified? If not, to what relief is the workman

entitled?”

2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to

the parties. Ist party workman submitted statement of claim

at page 2/1 to 2/7. The case of workman is that he was

appointed as clerk-cum-cashier on 8-12-71. He was

confirmed on the said post on 8-6-72 after completion of

minimum period of probation. He was working as clerk-

cum-cashier at the time of his dismissal from service. He

claims to be workman under I.D.Act. That he was

performing his duty sincerely and honestly. On 28-6-82,

there was a shortage of Rs.15,000 cash. It put him in

hardship and inconvenience. On the day when he returned

after lunch break about 3 to 4 PM alongwith other staff

members, he found shortage of cash of Rs, 15,000. He tried

to tally cash and reported the matter to the Branch Manager,

Karhi. The shortage of cash was confirmed by Branch

Manager. On advise of Branch Manager, he arranged

shortage amount. He closed the cash as per the advise of

the Manager filling up denominations. The matter ended

with loss of Rs.15,000.

3. That after about 5 months, he received letter from

Regional Manager Khandwa suspending him from service

and informing him that Deptt. enquiry was to follow.

Chargesheet was issued to him on 29-10-82 alleging charges

4634

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

against him “that he had misappropriated Bank’s Fund

amounting Rs.15,000’’. That the workman misused his

position in borrowing money from the customers of the

Bank. He retreats that he had deposited shortage amount

on advise of Bank Manager. The charge of misappropriation

was not consistent. He has narrated about details of his

duties. On 1-7-82, he was intending to proceed on leave.

The Branch Manager wanted the applicant to write a letter

that he should be careful in future to see that shortage

should not occur. That shortage of cash cannot be said

misappropriation.

4. He further contends that he received showcause

notice dated 7-7-1983 but without report of Enquiry Officer.

That the punishment of dismissal was imposed against

him on 3-9-83. He submits that he had borrowed money to

make good the shortage and even that action was treated

as charge by the Bank though no prejudice was caused to

the Bank. The findings of the Enquiry Officer are perverse.

There is no proof of misappropriation . Only there is

shortage and some negligence which cannot be termed as

misconduct. The dismissal is not proper and reasonable. It

is imposed without considering his clean service record.

He challenged his dismissal filing appeal. The appeal was

dismissed. Ist party prayed for reinstatement with back

wages.

5. The IInd party management filed Written

Statement at Page 3/1 to 3/5. The contentions of Ist party

are denied. It is not disputed that shortage of cash of

Rs. 15,000 was found on 20-6-82. It is submitted that

shortage of cash was found after surprise inspection was

taken by Branch Manager. That Ist party workman had

deposited the said amount. He was handling the cash. Loss

of Rs.15,000 was caused to the Bank because of the

shortage. The cash of Rs.15,000 shortage was confirmed

by workman. The departmental proceeding indicate Ist

party workman was on duty. It is denied that he was

burdened with heavy work. The Enquiry Officer recorded

his finding. Charge No.1 was proved, Charge No.2 not

proved. Competent Authority issued showcause notice.

Ist party workman misappropriated Bank’s funds of

Rs.15,000. It is serious misconduct therefore the punishment

of dismissal imposed by competent authority cannot be

said illegal and improper. The punishment of dismissal is

legal and justified.

6. IInd party further contended that punishment of

dismissal is confirmed by Appellate Authority. The

reference is not maintainable. It is submitted that if it is

found that Departmental Enquiry was not properly held,

the IInd party management be permitted to lead evidence

to substantiate the charges. IInd party prayed for rejection

of the claim of Ist party.

7. Ist party filed rejoinder at Page 4/1 to 4/2. It is

denied that shortage of cash was found after surprise

checking of the Branch Manager. He denies that the Bank

suffered any loss. On advise of Branch Manager, he had

borrowed amount and made good the loss alleged. As the

incident was of shortage of amount, there was no question

of lodging FIR. If the matter would have been of mis-

appropriation, the Manager should have been bound to

lodge FIR. It is denied that report of Enquiry Officer was

supplied to him before imposing penalty. He reitreates that

punishment is harsh and improper. He also alleges

victimization on the basis of some extraneous

consideration.

8. Considering pleadings on record, the points

which arise for my consideration and determination are as

under. My findings are recorded against each of them for

the reasons as below :—

(i)

Whether the Deptt. Enquiry

This issue is

conducted by management

already decided

against the workman is

on 16-4-1996 that

legal and proper? If not,

action of mgt.

whether the management

is legal.

is entitled to prove the

misconduct of workman.

(ii)

To what relief, if any, the

Workman is not

workman is entitled to?”

entitled to any

relief.

Preliminary issue as to whether enquiry is conducted

proper and legal is decided by my predecessor. Enquiry

was conducted proper. There was no breach of natural

justice.

9. Learned predecessor has framed issues on

25-7-06. Issue No.1 is already decided and enquiry is held

proper. There is no question of management proving

misconduct of workman by adducing evidence. The 2nd

issue is to what relief, if any is the workman entitled?

Though said issue is not clearly worded, it implies whether

the punishment imposed against Ist party workman is

proper and justified. My finding on the said issue is that

punishment of dismissal is proper for the reasons given

hereinafter.

REASONS

10. Learned counsel for Ist party workman Shri

Pandey submits that there was shortage of cash of

Rs.15,000 on 28-6-82. On advise of Branch Manager,

workman immediately deposited the said amount. Ist party

workman had borrowed amount from staff members, his

brother and other persons. According to Shri Pandey, the

shortage of amount cannot be said to be gross misconduct

under clause 19-5(J) . That clause 43(1) or bipartite

agreement was also brought to my notice. He finally

emphasized that dismissal of workman is harsh and he

prayed for his reinstatement with full back wages. Learned

counsel for IInd party Mr. Shashi submits that Ist party

workman was working as cashier-cum-clerk, shortage of

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4635

Rs.15,000 was informed to Branch Manager and the amount

was deposited. The shortage of amount was not detected

by Branch Manager on his surprise inspection. The

chargesheet was issued to workman for dishonestly

misappropriated the amount. The amount was borrowed

by the workman. The evidence was adduced . Learned

counsel emphasized that misconduct or misappropriation

is proved against Ist party. Punishment of dismissal from

service is just and proper. Learned counsel relies on Ratio

held in several cases. I would deal with the ratio held in the

cases at later part of the judgment.

11. The record of enquiry proceeding is produced.

Ist Bipartite Settlement is produced on record. Clause 19.5(j)

provides :—

“ doing any act prejudicial to the interest of the bank

of gross negligence or negligence involving or likely

to involve the bank in serious loss;”

The charge No. 1 against workman under Clause

19.5(j) doesnot include the Act of misappropriation, rather

it deals with negligence in duties prejudicial with the interest

of the Bank and likely to cause serious loss. The

misappropriation of Bank amount contemplates dishonestly

receiving the amount with intention to cause wrongful loss

to the Bank or wrongful gain to the employee. The evidence

of management’s witness Shri V.K.Arora, Branch Manager

is at page 17/8 of the record of Enquiry Proceedings. He

says on 28-6-82, while checking cash, at the close of the

business he found that Rs.15,000 were less than shown in

cash Balance Book. That when he asked cash from workman

Mr.Malviya, he agreed that he had taken away Rs.15,000

and he promised to bring the same. However he has given

in writing also and he brought Rs.6500 in cash, a cheque of

Rs.7000 and three withdrawals of Saving Bank from three

staff members aggregating Rs.1500. The cheque and

withdrawals were shown as late payment on 28-6-82. On

his evidence, letter was marked as Exhibit M-2. In his cross-

examination, he confirms that cash payment shows total

payment made on 28-6-82 as Rs.16779.96. The receipt book

of the day shown total receipt of Rs. 4639.58. The entries

bear his signatures. The total payment of Rs. 16779.96 bears

his signature. He admits that he had obtained Exhibit M-3

to M-6 from Mr. Malviya on 28-6-10. The charges alleged

against workman is at page 17/3. Charge No. 1 reads—

“ On 28-6-82 at about 5.30 PM, the Branch cash was

checked and it was found that there was a shortage

of Rs.15,000. On enquiring, you admitted that the

said cash has been taken away by you. You have,

therefore, dishonestly misappropriated the Bank’s

Funds amounting to Rs.15,000”.

12. The evidence of Branch Manager B.K.Arora is

clear that on his enquiry when he found the cash was

short, Malviya workman agreed that he had taken away

Rs.15,000 and promised to bring the same. So far as evidence

of management’s witness No.2 Shri R.C.Juhariya, in his

evidence, he says that on 20-6-82, he, Branch Manager

Arora and workman were present. The staff members left

for lunch. Workman told Branch Manager Arora that cash

is balanced and is to be kept inside. Mr.Arora went inside

the cash cabin and started checking the cash and found

Rs.15,000 short. It was told that one packet of Rs.100

denomination and one of Rs.50 denomination was found

less. Workman had deposited the said amount collecting

from staff members and other persons. His evidence in

cross-examination shows on 28-6-82, he had not seen Shri

Malviya taking out cash during working hours. No personal

search of Shri Malviya was taken in his presence for

shortage of cash was brought to his notice. In his statement

before Enquiry Officer, Ist party workman has admitted

that there was shortage of cash of Rs.15,000. He had

borrowed Rs. 7000 from M/s. Sudarshan Oil & chemicals

Industries, Karhi, Rs.11,000 from Shri Fathulal Madhavji

Patidar. The evidence of management’s witness about

shortage of amount and Ist party workman had admitted

that he had taken amount of Rs.15000 cash is not shattered

in cross-examination.

13. Learned counsel for IInd party Shri Shashi relied

on ratio held in case of Union of India Versus B.K.Srivastava

in AIR1998 SC-300. In Para-7 of the judgment, their Lordship

of the Apex Court held that-

“ The Tribunal couldnot sit in appeal against the

orders of the Disciplinary and Appellate Authorities

in exercise of its powers of judicial review.”

Though the observations are made in respect of the

matter decided by CAT, the principles laid down by their

lordship squarely covers the powers of this Tribunal also.

Further reliance is placed in case of Bank of India

versus D.Padmanabhadu and another in 1995 I LLJ P-235.

Their Lordship held—

“The order of dismissal was set aside by the Labour

Court on the grounds that the amount of

misappropriation has been paid back to the customer,

the workman belonged to Scheduled Tribe, the

workman should be given an opportunity to reform

himself. Their Lordship held intentional temporary

retention of money which doesnot belong to a person

is also misappropriation. Mere repayment will act

absorve the liability or misconduct of the respondent

workman. The Bank is the custodian of the money of

the customers and the cashier is a person who deals

with money and he must be more diligent and honest

and justify the trust reposed in him by the bank and

the customers. If once the customers lose confidence

in the dealings, the entire organization suffers and

confidence of the customers is the basis on which

the edifice of the banking system as well.”

4636

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Reliance is also placed on ratio held in case of Union

Versus State Bank of India in Miscellaneous Petition No.

18 of 1987. His Lordship considering the shortage of cash

of Rs. 9009 detected on 27-8-79. After enquiry, punishment

of dismissal was imposed.

Their Lordship in Para-15 of the judgment observed

that there was no justification for the Tribunal to hold that

the confessional statement was made in order to help the

other co-employee, officer-in-charge Shri C.B.Shankar. The

said defence was not accepted by the disciplinary authority

and the appellate authority. In any case, keeping in view all

other circumstances existing on record, the Tribunal

couldnot have substituted its own view on the evidence

adduced in the enquiry.

In the present case, considering the evidence on

record discussed above, I donot find reason to substitute

the punishment of dismissal against Ist party workman.

For above reasons I record my finding in Point No.2 in

Negative.

14. In the result, award is passed as under:-

(1)

The action of the management of IInd party Bank

in dismissing Ist party workman Shri S.K.Malviya

from services is just and legal.

(2)

Reliefs prayed by workman for his reinstatement

with back wages is rejected.

R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 8 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1640-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj bykgkckn cSad

ds çca/ra=k ds laca¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k

lhthvkbZVh@,ylh@vkj@47@05) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh;

ljdkj dks 4&7&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y& 12011@04@2005&vkbZ vkj (ch&II)º

lqefr ldykuh] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 8th July, 2013

S.O. 1640.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Diputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGIT/

LC/R/47/05) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur now as shown in the Annexure,

in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation

to the management of Allahabad Bank and Their workman

which was received by the Central Government on

04-7-2013

[ No. L- 12011/04/2005-IR(B-II)]

SUMATI SAKLANI, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

JABALPUR

No. CGIT/LC/R/47/05

PRESIDING OFFICER : SHRI R. B. PATLE

General Secretary,

Allahabad Bank Employees Union,

T.T.Nagar, Bhopal

...Workman/Union

Versus

The Asstt. General Manager,

Allahabad Bank,

Near Chetak Bridge, 6,

Gautam Nagar,

Bhopal

...Management

AWARD

Passed on this 18th day of June, 2013

1. As per letter dated 26-5-2005 by the Government

of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is

received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under

Section -10 of I. D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.

L-12011/4/2005 IR(DU). The dispute under reference relates

to :

‘‘ Whether the action of the management of

Allahabad Bank in imposing the punishment of

reduction by two stages in the scale of pay of Shri A.

M. Khan, Cash Clerk is legal and justified? If not to

what relief the concerned workman is entitled ?’’

After receiving reference, notices were issued to the

parties. 1st party workman failed to submit statement of

claim. He is proceeded exparte on 27-10-09.

3. The management submitted Written Statement.

The case as submitted by IInd party management is that

workman A.M. Khan was working as cash clerk in

Allahabad Bank, Bhopal. On 30-7-99, he had received

amount of Rs. 1 Lakh from customer Santosh Jain for

exchange of currency notes of Rs. l 00 denomination to

notes of 500 denomination. The amount of Rs. 1 Lakh was

missing from cash receipt counter of the branch. It amounts

to gross misconduct on part of workman. The chargesheet

was issued to workman on 29-5-00 for negligence in duty,

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4637

The details of charges are given in the para-5 of the Written

Statement. The Departmental Enquiry was initiated against

him. Shri S.G.Vaidya was appointed as Enquiry officer,

Mr. Vijay Dhok was Presenting Officer. Departmental

Enquiry was conducted giving full opportunity to the

delinquent workman. The enquiry was completed, charges

were proved. Disciplinary Authority issued notice,

punishment of reduction of basic pay by 2 stages was

imposed against workman. IInd party management prayed

for rejection of relief prayed by workman.

4. Considering pleadings on record, the points which

arise for my consideration and determination are as under.

My findings are recorded against each of them for the

reasons as below:-

“(i) Whether the action of the In Affirmative

management of Allahabad

Bank in imposing the

punishment of reduction by

two stages in the scale of

pay of Shri A. M. Khan,

Cash Clerk is legal?

(ii) If so, to what relief the Relief prayed by workman

workman is entitled to?” is rejected.

REASONS

5. Though the legality of punishment of reduction

of pay by two stages is referred for adjudication, the

workman has not filed statement of claim neither he has

adduced any evidence. The Written Statement filed by

management and affidavit of evidence of witness Shri Anil

Tondon shows that punishment of reduction of pay was

imposed holding enquiry of the charges that amount of

Rs. 1 Lakh was missing from cash counter while the

delinquent workman was working as cash clerk. The

evidence of witness of management remained

unchallenged. The copy of charge sheet and documents

of Enquiry Proceedings are produced on record. The

evidence of management's witness remained unchallenged.

I do not find any reason to disbelieve his evidence. For

above reasons, I record my finding on Point No.1 in

affirmative.

6. In the result, award is passed as under :-

(1) Action of the management of Allahabad Bank in

imposing the punishment of reduction by two stages

in the, scale of pay of shri A.M.Khan, Cash Clerk is

legal.

(2) Relief prayed by ,workman is rejected.

R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 9 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1641-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj MkbjsdVj]

iQkeZ e'khujh Vsªfuax ,.M VsfLVax bULVhV~;wV ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼

fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd

fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj

ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k lhthvkbZVh@,ylh@vkj@157@97) dks çdkf'kr

djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 28&6&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y& 42012@54@1996&vkbZ vkj (Mh;w)º

lkse ukFk] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 9th July, 2013

S.O. 1641.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Diputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGIT/

LC/R/157/97 of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in

the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation

to the management of The Director, Farm Machinery

Training and Testing Institute and their workman which

was received by the Central Government on 28-6-2013.

[ No. L- 42012/54/1996-IR(DU)]

SOM NATH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

JABALPUR

No. CGIT/LC/R/157/97

Presiding Officer : SHRI R. B. P A TLE

Smt. Aktari,

W/o Shri Jafer Khan,

Behind Railway Station,

Godi Mohalla, PO Budni,

Distt. Sehore (MP)

...Workman

Versus

The Director,

Farm Machinery Training and

Testing Institute, Tractor Nagar,

Budhni, Distt. Sehore

...Management

AWARD

Passed on this 18th day of March, 2013

1. As per letter dated 30-5-97 by the Government of

India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is

received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under

Section-10 of I.D. Act, 1947 as per Notification No.

L-42012/54/96-IR(DU) . The dispute under reference relates

to :

4638

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

‘‘Whether the action of the management of Central

Farm Machinery Training and Test Institute, Budni

in terminating the services of Smt.Aktari, W/o Shri

Jafer Khan is legal and justified? If not, to what relief

the workman is entitled?’’

2. After receipt of reference and notice to parties,

1st party submitted statement of claim at Page 8/1 to 8/2.

The case of 1st party workman is that she was employed

on daily wages as casual labour in the year 1987 by IInd

party. She rendered continuous service till her termination

in the year 1994. That she had completed 240 days working

in each of the calendar year. That IInd party with ulterior

motive adopted pick and choose policy. The services of

24 employees were regularized. Three of them namely Gulab,

Sivlal and Narmada Prasad were regularized though they

were above 70 years of age. Hiralal, Ashok Kumar and

Suresh who were engaged after 1st party were also

regularized. Services of 1st party were terminated without

notice or paying retrenchment compensation. On above

grounds, 1st party prays for her reinstatement with back

wages.

3. Despite of notices send by different modes to

IInd party including notice under Certificate of posting,

IInd party .failed to give appearance. IInd party was

proceeded exparte on 15-6-07.

4. Considering pleadings on record, the points

which arise for my consideration and determination are as

under. My findings are recorded against each of them for

the reasons as below :—

(i) Whether the termination of

In Negative

services of 1st party/workman

by IInd party management of

Central Farm Machinery

Training and Testing Institute,

Budhni is just and legal?

(ii) If not, what relief the

Ist party is entitled to

workman is entitled to?"

compensation

Rs. 40,000 and other

relief as per final order.

REASONS

5. 1st party/workman is challenging termination of

his services by IInd party. 1st party filed affidavit of

evidence at Page 10/1 to 10/2. 1st party in her affidavit has

stated that she was working with IInd party from 1987 to

1994. She had completed 240 days continuous service

during each of calendar year. That as per the scheme for

regularization of temporary employees in 1993, her services

were not regularized, other junior persons were regularized.

The persons who were overage such as Gulab, Sivlal,

Narmada Prasad were also regularized. She prays for

reinstatement with back wages.

6. The evidence of 1st party/workman remained

unchallenged. IInd party is proceeded exparte, therefore I

find no reason to disbelieve her evidence. 1st party is out

of employment since 1994. She was not served with notice,

no retrenchment compensation was paid. 1st party is a

rustic lady. Considering those facts, in my considered view

instead of reinstatement, compensation Rs. 40,000 would

be appropriate. In addition, 1st party is entitled to one

months wages in lieu of notice and retrenchment

compensation for 7 years service i.e. wages for 105 days.

For above reasons, I record my finding on Point No.1 in

Negative and Point No. 2 accordingly.

7. In the result, award is passed as under:-

‘‘1.Termination of services of 1st party Smt. Kamlabai

by IInd party is illegal.

2. IInd party is directed to pay compensation Rs.

40,000 to 1st party, one month wages in lieu of notice

and 105 days wages towards retrenchment

compensation.’’

The above amount shall be calculated at the rate of

last wage paid to the 1st party. Amount as per above order

be paid within 30 days from the date of award. In case of

default, the amount shall carry 9 % interest from the date

of award till its realization.

R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 9 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1642-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj MkbjsDVj] iQkeZ

e'khujh Vsªfuax ,.M VsfLVax bULVhV~;wV ds çca/ra=k ds laca¼ fu;kstdksa

vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds

iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k lhthvkbZVh@,ylh@vkj@153@97) dks çdkf'kr

djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 28&6&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y& 42012@56@1996&vkbZ vkj (Mh;w)º

lkseukFk] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 9th July, 2013

S.O. 1642.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Diputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGIT/

LC/R/153/97 of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in

the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation

to the management of The Director, Farm Machinery

Training and Testing Institute and their workman which

was received by the Central Government on 28-6-2013

[ No. L- 42012/56/1996-IR(DU)]

SOM NATH, Section Officer

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4639

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM-LABOUR COURT,

JABALPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/R/153/97

Presiding Officer : SHRI R. B. PATLE

Smt. Kamlabai,

W/o Shri Shivaprasad,

Behind Railway Station,

Godi Mohalla, Budni,

Sehore, Distt. (MP)

...Workman

Versus

The Director,

Farm Machinery Training and

Testing Institute, Tractor Nagar,

Budhni, Distt. Sehore

...Management

AWARD

Passed on this 18th day of March, 2013

1. As per letter dated 30-5-97 by the Government of

India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is

received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under

Section -10 of I. D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.

L-42012/56/96-IR(DU) . The dispute under reference relates

to:

‘‘Whether the action of the management of Central

Farm Machinery Training and Testing Institute, Budni

in terminating the services of Smt. Kamlabai W/o

Shri Shivaprasad is legal and justified? If not, to what

relief the workman is entitled?’’

2. After receipt of reference and notice to parties,

1st party submitted statement of claim at Page 5/1 to 5/2.

The case of 1st party workman is that she was employed

on daily wages as casual labour in the year 1987 by IInd

party. She rendered continuous service till her termination

in the year 1994. That she had completed 240 days working

in each of the calendar year. That IInd party with ulterior

motive adopted pick and choose policy. The services of

24 employees were regularized. Three of them namely Gulab,

Sivlal and Narmada Prasad were regularized though they

were above 70 years of age. Hiralal, Ashok Kumar and

Suresh who were engaged after 1st party were also

regularized. Services of 1st party were terminated without

notice or paying retrenchment compensation. On above

grounds, 1st party prays for her reinstatement with back

wages.

3. Despite of notices send by different modes to

Ilnd party including notice under Certificate of posting,

Ilnd party failed to give appearance. Ilnd party was

proceeded exparte on 15-6-07.

4. Considering pleadings on record, the points which

arise for my consideration and determination are as under.

My findings are recorded against each of them for the

reasons as below:-

(i) Whether the termination of

In Negative

services of 1st party/workman

by Ilnd party management of

Central Farm Machinery Training

and Testing Institute, Budhni

is just and legal ?

(ii) If not, what relief the

Ist party is entitled to

workman is entitled to?

compensation

Rs. 40,000 and other

relief as per final order.

REASONS

5. 1st party/workman is challenging termination of

his services by Ilnd party. 1st party filed affidavit of

evidence at Page 8/1 to 8/2. 1st party in her affidavit has

stated that she was working with Ilnd party from 1987 to

1994. She had completed 240 days continuous service

during each of calendar year. That as per the scheme for

regularization of temporary employees in 1993, her services

were not regularized, other junior persons were regularized.

The persons who were overage such as Gulab, Sivlal,

Narmada Prasad were also regularized. She prays for

reinstatement with back wages.

6. The evidence of 1st party/workman remained

unchallenged. IInd party is proceeded exparte, therefore I

find no reason to disbelieve her evidence. 1st party is out

of employment since 1994. She was not served with notice,

no retrenchment compensation was paid. 1st party is an

illiterate lady. Considering those facts, in my considered

view instead of reinstatement, compensation Rs. 40,000

would be appropriate. In addition, 1st party is entitled to

one months wages in lieu of notice and retrenchment

compensation for 7 years service i.e. wages for 105 days.

For above reasons, I record my finding on Point No.1 in

Negative and Point No. 2 accordingly.

7. In the result, award is passed as under :-

‘‘1. Termination of services of 1st party

Smt. Kamlabai by IInd party is illegal.

2. IInd party is directed to pay compensation Rs.

40,000 to 1st party, one month wages in lieu of notice

and 105 days wages towards retrenchment

compensation.’’

The above amount shall be calculated at the rate of

last wage paid to the 1st party. Amount as per above order

be paid within 30 days from the date of award. In case of

4640

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

default, the amount shall carry 9 % interest from the date

of award till its realization.

R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 9 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1643- vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj ;wdks cSad ds

çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/

esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k

lhthvkbZVh@,ylh@vkj@26@94) çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj

dks 26&4&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y&12012@254@93&vkbZ vkj (ch&II)º

lqefr ldykuh] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 9th July, 2013

S.O. 1643.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Diputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGIT/

LC/R/26/94) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in

the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation

to the management of Uco Bank and Their workman which

was received by the Central Government on 26-4-2013

[ No. L- 12012/254/93-IR(B-II)]

SUMATI SAKLANI, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM-LABOUR COURT,

JABALPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/R/26/94

Presiding Officer : SHRI R. B. P A TLE

Shri Sunil Kumar Negi,

C/o Shri Satish Govila,

10, Kanti Nagar, Gwalior

...Workman

Versus

Zonal Manager,

UCO Bank, 269/270,

M.P.Nagar,

Zone-II, Bhopal

...Management

AWARD

Passed on this 9th day of April, 2013

1. As per letter dated 2-3-94 by the Government of

India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is

received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under

Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.L-12012/

254/93-IR(B-2) . The dispute under reference relates to:

‘‘Whether the action of the management of UCO

Bank, Bhopal in terminating the services of Shri Sunil

Kumar Negi, Peon with effect from 1-1-1993 is

justified? If not, what relief is the workman entitled

to?’’

2. After receipt of reference, notices were issued to

the parties. 1st party workman filed his statement of claim

at page 3/1 to 3/7. The case of workman is that he was

working on daily wages @ Rs.15 with UCO Bank from

1-11-98. That he was performing work of the peon in 1989,

he was paid wages Rs. 25 per day, in 1990 Rs. 43 per day.

He was paid bonus of the year 1990-91, 1991-92. That he

was in continuous service of the IInd party. He had worked

more than 240 days every year. That as per circular dated

19-10-89, he had submitted application on 29-11-89 for

appointment on permanent post. The said application was

forwarded to IInd party. His application was placed before

the Panel. Thereafter he was paid wages Rs.43 per day

trom July, 1990. Other employee Om Prakash was also

paid wages Rs. 43 per day.

3. He submits that his services were illegally

terminated without notice from 1-1-93. He was not paid

compensation. He filed conciliation proceedings and

dispute has been referred. He has reitreated that his

services are terminated in violation of Section 25-F & G of

LD.Act. He prays for his reinstatement with back wages.

4. IInd party submitted Written Statement at Page

8/1 to 8/3. IInd party raised preliminary objection that the

petition is filed against officials of the Bank which is not

tenable. That 1st party workman was engaged as casual

worker by UCO Bank, Gwalior Branch. He was not engaged

as a peon against permanent post. Therefore he is not

entitled to reliefs as claimed by him. That settlement has

arrived between management Bank and the Union on

12-10-89 whereby a scheme was formulated to observe

those eligible casual workers who has worked for a period

of 240 days or more between 12-10-86 to 11-10-89. The

scheme was circulated. The casual workers having

minimum age of 18 and maximum 26 years on date of initial

engagement were eligible for absorption. That the 1st party

workman was not fulfilling eligibility conditions therefore

he could not be observed. It is further submitted that the

1st party workman was engaged on daily wages, he had

not completed 240 days services. The wages were paid

Rs.18, 20, 24 and 25. From July 90, wages paid Rs.43 to the

1st party workman. The IInd party denied that 1st party

was its employee. Workman had not completed 240 days

continuous service. Therefore there was no question of

termination of his services. All other contention of

workman are denied. That notice was not required to be

given to the workman. That Om Prakash Shakya found

eligible for absorption. It is denied that workman had

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4641

acquired right to be absorbed in regular employment.

Management prayed for rejection of claim of 1st party

workman.

5. 1st party workman filed rejoinder at Page 9/1 to

9/2. The contentions raised in the Written Statement of

IInd party are denied. The workman contended that he

had completed 240 days continuous service. He had

acquired status of permanent employee as he was not a

casual labour. It is denied that he is not working as peon.

That in September 1990, Divisional Manager had told that

he was included in the panel for absorption and wages

Rs. 43 per day were paid to him. He claims that he had

completed 18 years of age at the time of appointment as

such he is entitled to absorption in service.

6. Considering pleadings on record, the points which

arise for my consideration and determination are as under.

My findings are recorded against each of them for the

reasons as below:-

(i) Whether the action of the

In Negative

management of UCO Bank,

Bhopal in terminating the

services of Shri Sunil Kumar

Negi, Peon with effect from

1-1-1993 is legal?

(ii) If so, to what relief the

1st party workman is

workman is entitled to?" entitled to compensation

Rs.40,000, notice pay

equal to 30 days wages,

retrenchment compen-

sation equal to 60 days

wages at the rate of

Rs. 43 per day.

REASONS

In his statement of claim, 1st party workman claims

that he is entitled to absorption with the Bank as per

settlement between the Union and the Bank dated

19-10-89. Reference does not include said part of the claim

of the 1st party workman. The contentions of the workman

in that regard are beyond the scope of reference. The

reference is made only about legality of the termination of

the services of Ist party workman and secondly reliefs. In

his rejoinder, workman states that he had completed 18

years age at the time of appointment. As per the statement

of claim, he was engaged on 1-11-88, he was paid wages at

different rates. Even he was paid bonus for year 1990-91

and 1991-92. 1st party workman has filed affidavit of his

evidence covering all his material contentions in statement

of claim. In his cross-examination, he says that he was

engaged on work in Bank in November 1986 by

management, appointment order was not given to him. He

had not submitted application in writing. That he was

doing all the works in the Bank. He was not signing the

muster register. He was engaged on daily wage basis. His

wages were paid under voucher. He was working in the

Bank from 1986 to 1993. That Bank had not given any

certificate. There was settlement between Bank and the

Union for absorption of daily wage employees. He had

submitted application Exhibit W-l. In Exhibit W-l, his date

of birth is shown as 15-8-1971. His date of engagement is

shown as 1-11-88. His evidence is not consistent with

said document. If Document Exhibit W -1 is accepted, he

had not completed 18 years of age at the time of his initial

engagement. Document Exhibit W -4 certificate of passing

school examination shows his date of birth as 15-8-71.

The document Exhibit W -10 shows that 1st party workman

was engaged as casual worker. The scheme for absorption

was formulated. The age of absorption is minimum 18 years

and maximum 26 years. It is clear from the evidence that

the workman did not fulfill the conditions for appointment.

The copy of the scheme is produced at Exhibit W -2. The

eligibility criteria for absorption is working of 240 days

with or without break for a period of 3 year and age between

18 to 26 years. The scheme for absorption of the workman

is beyond the terms of reference. Besides it, the workman

doesnot fulfill the age criteria as per the scheme for

absorption. Therefore said claim of the 1st paprty cannot

be accepted.

8. Ist party workman claims that he had completed

240 days continuous service during each of the year. His

services are terminated without issuing notice or payment

of compensation etc. IInd party management has

contended that workman had not completed 240 days

service. He was working as casual labour as per exigencies.

There was no need to give notice. The controversy

revolves around whether the workman completed 240 days

continuous service. In the affidavit of evidence, workman

says that he was continuously working in the Bank from

1-11-88 to 1-1-93. However in his cross-examination he

says that he was working in the Bank from November

86. The contrary suggestions are denied by the 1st party

workman. Learned counsel for IInd party Mr. Bhattacharjee

submits that the burden lies on workman to prove that he

was working for 240 days preceding his termination.

“Reliance is placed in ratio held in case of Range

Forest Officer Versus S.T.Hadimani in 2002 Supreme Court

Cases (L&S) 367. Their Lordship of the apex court dealing

with onus and manner of proof for completion of length of

continuous service held - where the workman claims that

he had worked for 240 days in the year preceding his

termination was denied by the employer, it was for the

claimant to lead evidence to that effect. It was held that

workman' s affidavit was not sufficient evidence for that

purpose.”

“Similar view was held in case of Surendranagar

District Panchayat Versus Dahyabhai Amarsingh in 2006

Supreme Court Cases (L&S) 38. In said case, Lordship of

the Apex Court held that burden of proof lies on the

4642

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

workman. It is for the workman to adduce evidence apart

from examining himself or filing an affidavit to prove the

said factum. Such evidence may be in form of receipt of

salary or wages for 240 days or record of his appointment

or engagement for that year to show that he has worked

with the employer for 240 days or examination of a

co-worker.”

9. Management's witness Shri S.C.Jain has stated

that workman had not completed 240 days continuous

service preceding his termination. In his cross-examination,

management's witness says that the workman was paid

bonus for 1 to 2 years. At fag end of his cross-examination,

management witness says that bonus of 2 year was paid

to the workman. The documents about payment of bonus

paid to the 1st party workman is produced by management

as Exhibit M-2. The bonus of Rs. 1307.49 was paid for 365

days at the rate of Rs.43 per day. It corroborates evidence

of 1st party that he was working for more than 240 days in

the IInd party management.

10. 1st party workman is discontinued without

issuing notice or paying compensation. As workman has

completed 240 days continuous service, his evidence is

corroborated by document Exhibit M-2, the termination of

services of 1st party workman is in violation of Section

25-F of I.D.Act.

11.The question is to what relief the workman is

entitled. From cross-examination of workman, it is clear

that he was not appointed following proper procedure. He

is also not entitled for absorption as per the scheme

between the management and the Union as he did not

fulfill eligibility for absorptions his age was less than 18

years at the time of his initial appointment.

12. Learned counsel for management Shri Bhattacharjee

relies on ratio held in case of Himanshu Kumar Vidyarthi

and others versus State of Bihar and others reported in

1997 Supreme Court Cases (L&S) 1079.

“Their Lordship held the main grievance of petitioner

is that termination of their service under violation of

Section 25-F of I.D. Act, 1947. The question for

consideration therefore is whether the petitioner can be

said workman within the meaning of Section 25-F of I.D.

Act. That every department of Government cannot be

treated as industry dispensing with services of persons

engaged on daily wages in a government department

therefore is not a retrenchment.”

The ratio held in the case has no bearing to

controversy between parties. No evidence is adduced by

management that it is not covered as an industry.

Considering oral and documentary evidence on record as

1st party workman was not appointed following prescribed

procedure, he doesnot fulfill eligibility for absorption. 1st

party workman is not entitled for reinstatement with full

back wages. Instead compensation would meet the ends

of justice. In my considered view, 1st party workman

working with IInd party management from November 88 to

1-1-93 had completed 4 years service is entitled to

retrenchment compensation for period of 4 years

completed service i.e. equal to 60 days wages. One month

wages in lieu of notice and compensation Rs.40,000 in lieu

of reinstatement. For above reasons, I record my finding

on Point No.I in Negative.

13. Point No. 2 :— 1st party workman is entitled to

compensation Rs. 40,000 etc.

14. In the result, award is passed as under:-

(1) The action of the IInd party management in

terminating the services of Ist party workman

Shri Sunil Kumar Negi w.e.f. 1-1-93 is illegal.

(2) IInd party shall pay compensation Rs.40,000,

notice pay equal to 30 days wages, retrenchment

compensation equal to 60 days wages at the rate of

Rs. 43 per day.

Amount as per above shall be paid within 30 days

from the date of award. In case of default, amount shall

carry interest 9% per annum till its realization.

R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 9 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1644-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947

(1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj

¯lfMdsV cSad ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa

ds chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] y[kumQ ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k

147@2001) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks

04&07&2013 dks izkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y& 12011@113@2001&vkbZ vkj (ch&II)º

lqefr ldykuh] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 9th July, 2013

S.O. 1644.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (I.D. No. 147/

2001) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Lucknow now as shown in the Annexure, in

the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to

the management of Syndicate Bank and their workmen,

which was received by the Central Government on

04-07-2013.

[No. L-12011/113/2001-IR(B-II)]

SUMATI SAKLANI, Section Officer

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4643

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL

TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

LUCKNOW

PRESENT : Dr. MANJU NIGAM, Presiding Officer

I.D. No. 147/2001

Ref. No. L-12011/113/2001-IR (B-II) dated:

7-09-2001

BETWEEN

The State Secretary,

Syndicate Bank Empls. Union, U.P. State Committee

211, Vinay Place, Ashok Marg,

Lucknow (U.P.) -226001

(Espousing cause of Shri Ashok Kumar)

AND

The Dy. General Manager

Syndicate Bank

Zonal Office, Meerut Wing

Bhawani Puram University

Meerut (U.P.)

ORDER

1. By order No. L-12011/113/2001-IR (B-II) dated :

07-09-2001 and its subsequent corrigendum dated 21-01-

2002 the Central Government in Ministry of Labour, New

Delhi in exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-

section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) referred this

industrial dispute between the State Secretary, Syndicate

Bank Empls. Union U.P. State committee, 211, Vinay Place,

Ashok Marg, Lucknow (U.P.) and the Dy. General Manager,

Syndicate Bank, Zonal Office, Meerut Wing, Bhawani

Puram University, Meerut (U.P.) for adjudication.

2. The reference under adjudiaction is :

“Whether the Action of Syndicate Bank in

dismissing Sh. Ashok Kumar from services vide

order dated 20-04-2000 is just, fair and legal? If

not, what relief he is entitled to ?”

3. It is admitted case of the parties that the workman,

Ashok Kumar was working as Clerk in the Alipur Branch of

the Bank when he was placed under suspension vide order

dated 11-01-95 and subsequently, was issued a major

penalty charge sheet dated 01-05-98 for alleged gross

misconduct. Initially Shri Prem Raj and later on Shri R.K.

Garg was appointed as Enquiry Officer, who submitted his

enquiry report dated 30-11-99 before the disciplinary

authority with finding that the charges leveled against the

workman were found proved. The Disciplinary Authority,

on the basis of findings of the Enquiry Officer, issued a

Show Cause Notice dated 15-02-2000 to the workman and

proposed the punishment of 'Dismissal from the service of

the Bank without notice' and after granting an opportunity

for personal hearing inflicted the said punishment vide his

order dated 20-04-2000. The aggrieved workman preferred

an appeal, which was rejected by the Appellate Authority

vide order dated 15-09-2000.

4. It has been alleged by the workman's union

that there was flagrant denial of natural justice to the

workman in course of the enquiry, in as much as he was not

provided certain documents, requested by him during the

course of enquiry which cause prejudice to him; therefore,

the domestic enquiry is liable to be vitiated and the action

of Syndicate Bank in dismissing the workman from the

service of the Bank vide order dated 20-04-2000 be declared

unjust, unfair and illegal and the workman be reinstated

with full back wages and other consequential benefits.

5. The management of the Bank in its written

statement has denied the allegations of the workman's

union and has defended its domestic proceedings with

submission that the workman had been afforded all

opportunity given under rules the principles of natural

justice were fully complied with; hence, there is no anomaly

with it; and accordingly, has prayed that domestic enquiry

proceedings conducted by it may be upheld and the action

of the Bank vide order dated 20-04-2000 be declared just,

fair and legal without any benefit to the workman concerned.

6. After completion of the pleadings of the parties,

following preliminary issues were framed in the presence

of the parties vide order dated 10-02-2009.

(i) Kya vibhagiya jaanch naisargik nayay ke niyamon

ke anuroop the athwa nahi/trutipurn hai athwa

nahi?

(ii) Kya jaanch adhikaari dwara di gai aakhya

durahgrahpurna (perverse) hai? Athva nahi?

The parties were called upon to adduce their

evidence on preliminary issues. The parties filed

documents in support of their respective case and adduced

oral evidence. The workman examined himself; whereas

the management examined Shri Prem Raj and Shri R.K. Garg,

the Enquiry Officers in support of their case. The parties

availed opportunity to cross-examine each other witnesses.

Both the parties forwarded oral arguments on preliminary

issues.

7. After hearing the parties’ authorized

representatives of the parties and going through entire

material available on record, following orders were passed

on preliminary issues vide order dated 21-08-2012:

“The disciplinary enquiry was conducted in

accordance with the principles of natural justice and

the workman was afforded all reasonable opportunity

4644

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

to defend himself; and also, the findings of the

Enquiry Officer does not appear to be perverse. As

such, both the issues are decided in favour of the

management. The parties are called upon to forward

their argument regarding quantum of punishment

vide impugned order dated 20-04-2000 on

05-10-2012”.

8. On the date fixed for arguments the workman

remained absent. However, he was present along with his

authorized representative, the management was

represented by Shri P.K. Jha, Manager (HR/SR). The parties

forwarded their oral argument on the point of quantum of

punishment under Section 11 A of the Industrial Disputes

Act, 1947.

9. Heard, parties and perused entire material

available on record.

10. It has been contended by the authorized

representative of the workman that the Labour has ample

power under section 11-A of the I.D. Act to substitute a

lesser punishment, taking into consideration the facts and

circumstances of the case. It was submitted that principle

of proportionality calls for interference of this Court into

the punishment imposed by the management i.e. of

dismissal. It has relied on Joseph Solomon vs. Presiding

Officer, Labour Court, U.P., Dehradun & another 2012 (134)

FLR 424.

11. Per contra, the management has argued that the

Court cannot sit in appeal or it cannot re-appreciate the

evidence relied before Inquiry Officer; in as much as it

cannot alter the order or punishment. It was submitted

that the scope of invoking the powers given under Section

11 A of the Act, by the Labour Court is confined to the

condition that the Court should interfere with the order of

punishment when it is disproportionate with respect to

the misconduct committed or it is harsh. It has further

been argued that in the instant case the workman was

given charge sheet for committing misconduct of ‘doing

acts prejudicial to the interest of the bank’ i.e.

misappropriation of the Bank’s money; and was penalized

with dismissal after conducting a thorough inquiry and

this Tribunal vide its order dated 21-08-2012 has found

that “the disciplinary enquiry was conducted in accordance

with the principles of natural justice and the workman was

afforded all reasonable opportunity to defend himself; and

also, the findings of the Enquiry Officer do not appear to

be perverse”; hence there is no scope for this Tribunal to

interfere with the quantum of punishment order as the

same is well proportionate order, as the workman was

punished for proved gross misconduct i.e.

misappropriation. It has submitted that the

misappropriation of Bank’s money speaks ill of the honesty

and integrity of the workman concerned. This is definitely

an act prejudicial to the interest of the Bank. Such

employees cannot be kept on the rolls of the Bank. It has

relied on Bank of India vs Vishwa Mohan (1998) Lab IC

2514.

The bank management has further submitted that

the Bank being a financial institution dealing with the

public money and the employees of the Bank are required

to exhibit utmost honesty and integrity in day to day

transaction/functioning. The act of dishonesty or fraud

or misappropriation constitute misconduct of serious

nature warranting penalty of dismissal. As the charges

leveled against the workman were of serious/grave in

nature, which were duly proved in the inquiry, therefore,

the action of the management is justified. It has been

argued by the bank that the aforesaid act of the workman

has shaken the confidence of the bank in him and he is not

fit to be kept in the services of the Bank, therefore deserves

no’ interference into the quantum of punishment by this

Tribunal. It has relied on Municipal Committee, Bandugarh

vs. Kishan Baha and others 1996 Lab IC 1050.

12. I have given my thoughtful consideration to

the rival contentions of the authorized representatives of

the parties and perused case laws relied on by them.

13. In the instant case the workman was charge

sheeted with the allegation of ‘doing acts prejudicial to

the interest of bank vide clause No. 19.5 (j) of Bipartite

Settlement; and during Disciplinary Proceedings, it has

come out that the workman misappropriated an amount of

Rs. 50,000. The inquiry and its findings were upheld by

this Tribunal vide order dated 21-08-2012, holding that the

disciplinary enquiry was conducted in accordance with

the principles of natural justice and the workman was

afforded all reasonable opportunity to defend himself; and

also, that the findings of the Enquiry Officer does not

appear to be perverse’. Hence, after decision of the

preliminary issues in the favour of the management, the

workman has pleaded that the punishment imposed upon

him is disproportionate and this Tribunal should interfere

into it within the provisions providing under Section 11 A

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

14. Hon’ble Apex Court in B. C. Chayurvedi v.

Union of India, (1995) 6 SCC 749 while discussing about

the scope of judicial review, in disciplinary matters, has

observed as under:

“The High Court/Tribunal, while exercising the

power of judicial review, cannot normally substitute

its won conclusion on penalty and impose some

other penalty. If the punishment imposed by the

disciplinary authority or the appellate authority

shocks the conscience of the High Court/Tribunal,

it would appropriately mould the relief, either

directing the disciplinary/appellate authority to

reconsider the penalty imposed, or to shorten the

litigation, it may itself, in exceptional and rare cases,

imposed appropriate punishment with cogent

reasons in support thereof. ”

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4645

In DG, RPF Vs. Sai Babu (2003) 4 SCC 331, Hon’ble

Apex Court has observed that :

“6 ............. Normally, the punishment imposed by a

disciplinary authority should not be disturbed by

the High Court or a tribunal except in appropriate

cases that too only after reaching a conclusion that

the punishment imposed is grossly or shockingly

disproportionate, after examining all the relevant

factors including the nature of charges proved

against, the past conduct, penalty imposed earlier,

the nature of duties assigned having due regard to

their sensitiveness, exactness expected of an

discipline required to be maintained, and the

department/establishment which the delinquent

person concerned works.”

In United Commercial Bank vs. P. C. Kakkar (2003) 4

SCC 364 Hon’ble Apex Court on review of a long line of

cases and the principles of judicial review of administrative

action under English law summarized the legal position in

the following words :

“11. The common thread running through in all these

decisions is that the court should not interfere with

the administrators’ decision unless it was illogical

or suffers from procedural impropriety or was

shocking to the conscience of the court, in the sense

that it was in defiance of logic or moral standards. In

view of what has been stated in Wednesbury case

the court would not go into the correctness of the

choice made by the administrator open to him and

the court should not substitute its decision to that

of the administrator. The scope of judicial review is

limited to the deficiency in decision-making process

and not the decision.

12. To put it differently, unless the punishment

imposed by the disciplinary authority or the appellate

authority shocks the conscience of the court/

tribunal, there is no scope for interference. Further,

to shorten litigation it may, in exceptional and rare

cases, impose appropriate punishment by recording

cogent reasons in support thereof.”

In Union of India vs. S. S. Ahluwalia (2007) 7 SCC

257 Hon’ble Supreme Court reiterated the legal position

as follows:

“8 ............ The scope of judicial review in the matter

of imposition of penalty as a result of disciplinary

proceedings is very limited. The court can interfere

with the punishment only if it finds the same to be

shockingly disproportionate to the charges found

to be proved.”

In State of Meghalaya v. Mecken Singh N. Marak

(2008) 7 SCC 580 Hon’ble Supreme Court stated that :

“The punishment imposed by the disciplinary

authority or the appellate authority unless shocking

to the conscience of the court, cannot be subjected

to judicial review.

15. Hon’ble Apex Court in Administrator, Union

Territory of Dadra and Nagar Haveli vs. Gulbhia M. Lad

(2010) 2 SCC (L&S) 101 has observed that

“The legal position is fairly well settled that while

exercising the power of judicial review, the High

Court or a Tribunal cannot interfere with the

discretion exercised by the disciplinary authority,

and/or on appeal the appellate authority with regard

to the imposition of punishment unless such

discretion suffers from illegality or material

procedural irregularity or that would shock the

conscience of the court/tribunal. The exercise of

discretion in imposition of punishment by the

disciplinary authority or appellate authority is

dependent on host of factors such as gravity of

misconduct, past conduct, the nature of duties

assigned to the delinquent, responsibility of the

position that the delinquent holds, previous penalty,

if any, and the discipline required to be maintained

in the department or establishment he works.

Ordinarily the court or the tribunal would not

substitute its opinion on reappraisal of facts.”

16. In the instant case the workman, was deputed

to bring inward case remittance of Rs. 50,000 from Sardhana

Branch and was required to deposit the inward cash

remittance with Alipur Branch on 11-10-1994. After having

taken the case remittance of Rs. 50,000 from Sardhana

Branch the workman did not deposit the cash with Alipur

Branch, instead, he falsely reported that on his way back

to Alipur Branch while he was travelling in a Truck, the

cash was looted/robbed from him. Whereas subsequent

investigation/findings by the Police Authorities revealed

that no evidence was found which could lead to show

that incidence of loot etc. had taken place as stated by the

workman. Thereafter, it was construed that the workman

misappropriated a sum of Rs. 50,000 received by him from

Sardhana Branch.

The Bank management has argued that the

misappropriation of the Bank’s money speaks ill of the

honesty and integrity of the workman concerned. This is

definitely an act prejudicial to the interest of the Bank,

which leads to loss of faith in the workman. In Air India

Corporation Bombay vs. V. A. Ravellow 1972 (25) FLR 319

(SC) it has been observed that :

“Once the employer has lost the confidence in the

employee and the bona fide loss of confidence is

affirmed, the order of punishment must be

considered to be immune from challenge, for the

reason that discharging the office of trust and

confidence requires absolute integrity, and in a case

4646

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

of loss of confidence, reinstatement cannot be

directed.”

In Knhaiyalal Agarwal and Others vs. Factory

Manager, Gwaliar Sugar Co. Ltd. AIR 2001 SC 3645 Hon’ble

Apex court laid down the test for loss of confidence to

find out as to whether there was bona fide loss of

confidence in the employee, observing that:

“(i) the workman is holding the position of trust and

confidence; (ii) by abusing such position, be

commits act which results in forfeiting the same;

and (iii) to continue him in service/establishment

would be embarrassing. the inconvenient to the

employee, or would be detrimental to the discipline

or security of the establishment. Loss of confidence

cannot be subjective, based upon the mind of the

management. Objective facts which would lead to a

definite inference of apprehension in the mind of

the management, regarding trust worthiness or

reliability of the employee, must be alleged and

proved.”

In State Bank of India and Another v. Bela Bagchi

and Others AIR 2005 SC 3272, repelled the contention that

even if by the misconduct of the employee the employer

does not suffer any financial loss, he can be removed

frorn service in a case of loss of confidence. Further in

A.P. SRTC v. Raghuda Shiva Sankar Prasad AIR 2007 SC

152 Hon’ble Apex court has observed that in case of theft,

the quantum of theft is not import and what is important is

the loss of confidence of employer in employee.

17. Thus, the Bank being a financial institution

dealing with the public money, the employees of the Bank

are required to exhibit utmost honesty and integrity in day

to day transaction/functioning. The act of dishonesty or

fraud or misappropriation lowers down the reputation of

Bank in public. The public loose their confidence in Bank,

which affects Bank’s business and finally the national

economy.

18. Hon’ble Apex Court in (2011) 1 Supreme Court

Cases (L&S) 721 has observed that:

“7. It is now well settled that the courts will not act

as an appellate court and reassess the evidence led

in the domestic enquiry, nor interfere on the ground

that another view is possible on the material on

record. If the inquiry has been fairly and properly

held and the findings are based on evidence, the

question of adequacy of the evidence or the reliable

nature of the evidence will not be grounds for

interfering with the findings in departmental

enquiries. Therefore the courts will not interfere with

findings of fact recorded in departmental inquiries,

except where such findings are based on no evidence

or where they are clearly perverse. The test to find

out perversity is to see whether a tribunal acting

reasonably could have arrived at such conclusion

or findings, on the material on record. The courts

will however interfere with the findings in

disciplinary matters, if principles of natural justice

or statutory regulations have been violated or if the

order is found to be arbitrary, capricious, mala fide

or based on extraneous considerations.”

19. In the instant case the charge of

misappropriation of the Bank’s money was found to be

proved and principles of natural justice were properly

observed while conducting the departmental inquiry; and

also the findings of the Inquiry Officer were not found to

be perverse. Therefore, under the facts and the

circumstances and considering the laws, there is no

justification in interfering with the punishment imposed

upon the workman by the Disciplinary Authority for

proved gross misconduct of ‘misappropriation’.

Accordingly, the workman is not entitled for any relief.

20. Award as above.

LUCKNOW,

20th June, 2013.

Dr. MANJU NIGAM, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 9 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1645-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj cSad vkWiQ

bafM;k ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k

lhthvkbZVh@,ylh@vkj@2@92) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh;

ljdkj dks 27&6&2013 dks izkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y& 12012@345@91&vkbZvkj (ch&II)º

lqefr ldykuh] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 9th July, 2013

S.O. 1645.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (No. CGIT/LC/R/

2/92) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour

Court, Jabalpur now as shown in the Annexure, in the

Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of Bank of India and their workman, which

was received by the Central Government on 27-6-2013.

[No. L-12012/345/91-IR (B-II)]

SUMATI SAKLANI, Section Officer

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4647

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

JABALPUR

No. CGIT/LC/R/2/92

Presiding Officer : SHRI R. B. P ATLE

Shri Munnalal Batham,

S/o Shri Narayan Prasad Batham,

1/173, Sardarpura,

Behind Kamal Talkies, Ujjain

.....Workman

Versus

Regional Manager,

Bank of India,

18, Shanku Marg,

Freeganj, Ujjain

....Management

AWARD

Passed on this 11th day of June, 2013

1. As per letter dated 31.12.1991 by the Government

of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is

received. The reference is made to this tribunal under

Section 10 of I.D. Act, 1947 as per Notification No.

L-12012/345/91-IR (B-II). The dispute under reference

relates to :

“ Whether the action of the management of Bank

of India, Ujjain in terminating the services of

Shri Munnalal Batham, S/o Shri Narayan Prasad is

justified? If not, what relief is the workman entitled

to?”

2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to

the parties. 1st party workman filed Statement of claim at

Page 2/1 to 2/3. The case of 1st party workman is that he

was appointed as peon on 12-2-80. He belong to Schedule

Caste. Account was opened from 3-3-1980. His wages were

deposited in said account. He had submitted medical

certificate about his fitness of the Bank. He was paid wages

Rs. 13.50 per day. He further submits that he had acquired

eligibility for appointment on regular basis. He should

have been given appointment in 1983-84. That his services

were terminated from 26-6-84. That termination of his

services is against principles of natural justice. He was

not paid retrenchment compensation. 3 months notice was

not given to him for terminating services. He was not paid

notice pay, retrenchment compensation was not paid.

Principles of last come 1st go was not followed. He submits

that termination of his service is in violation of Article

16(4), 335 and 46 of the Constitution. That Regulation 507

of Sastry Award is violated. On such contentions, 1st party

workman prays for his reinstatement with consequential

benefits.

3. IInd party filed Written Statement at Page 9/1 to

9/6. According to IInd party, Ist party workman was working

as a Badli Sepoy, his name was included in panel of Badli

Sepoy after it was sponsored by the Employment

Exchange. That the management of Bank used to keep

panels of badly employees. They can be engaged for

temporary period as and when required in leave vacancy

of permanent employee. That workman was knowing about

the same. He had worked in the Bank for few days during

the year March 1982 to June 84 as Badli Peon. It is further

contented that the workman was not interested to work as

badly employee. The management cannot give regular

employment as he has not completed requisite number of

days for regularization of his services. Instead of coming

to the Bank as Badli employee, he stopped coming to the

work. After proceeding before the ALC, W.P. No. 62/87

was filed. Said Writ petition was dismissed. Since June

1984, the workman was not reporting to work as Badli

employee.

4. IInd party denies that workman was engaged on

the post of peon. Rather it is submitted that he was engaged

as Badli Sepoy. The workman was not satisfied with his

working as Badli Sepoy in leave vacancy. The regular

employment could not be provided to him. The workman

himself stopped coming to work as Badli sepoy. His name

was in the panel. Violation of Regulation 507 of Sastry

Award or violation of Section 25-F of I.D. Act is denied.

2nd party prayed for rejection of claim of Ist party .

5. Ist party filed rejoinder at page 13/1 to 13/2 and

reiterated his contentions that he was working on the post

of peon from 1984. He further submits that Naval Kishore

Raikwar, Vijay Kumar Jain, Mahendra Naagar, Ramdas

Chowdhary junior to him were working with the IInd party.

His services were illegally terminated.

6. Considering pleadings on record, the points

which arise for my consideration and determination are as

under. My findings are recorded against each of them for

the reasons as below:—

(i)

Whether the action of the

Services of workman

management of Bank of

are not terminated, he

India, Ujjain in terminating

was working as Badli

the services of Shri Munnalal

peon.

Batham, S/o Shri Narayan

Prasad is legal?

(ii) If so, to what relief the

Relief prayed by

workman is entitled to?

workman is rejected.

REASONS

7. Workman is challenging termination from service

by Bank of India, Ujjain. In his statement of claim, he has

contented that he was not issued notice, retrenchment

compensation was not paid, notice pay was not paid.

Those contentions of workman are denied by the

management. The management contends that the workman

4648

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

was working as Badli peon, his name was sponsored from

Employment Exchange. The workman was not interested

in working as Badli peon. The Bank could not regularize

his services as required number of working days were not

completed.

8. Workman filed affidavit of his evidence at Page

20/1 to 20/3. He has stated on oath that he was selected by

Committee on 12-2-1980. He was appointed as peon. He

was paid wages at Rs.13.50 per day. The wages were

deposited in account opened in the Bank. He was not

given increment in 1983-84. That his services were

terminated without notice, no retrenchment compensation

was paid, permission was also not obtained. In his cross-

examination, the workman has stated that he was working

as Badli employee in the Bank. The Bank had approved

him as Badli employee. He has stated that his services

were terminated from 26-6-84. He has admitted his

signatures on documents R-4/17, 18, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14,

20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 39. It did not recollect the

month of 1982 he was working in the Bank. He has stated

that he was working for 10-15 days in the Bank in leave

vacancy. He also admits that he was not in continuous

service of the bank. He was not happy with the working as

Badli employee in the bank. In his further cross-

examination, he admits that his wages were deposited in

Bank Account. From his evidence, it is clear that workman

was engaged as Badli peon in Bank.

9. Learned counsel for Ist party tried to emphasize

that other Badli employee junior to the workman working

in the bank were appointed on regular basis. The evidence

of cross-examination of management’s witness Shri Joshi

was brought to my notice. In para-18 of his cross-

examination Mr. Joshi has stated that juniors to the

workman were made permanent as they had worked for

more days. That the list is not corrected . The witness was

unable to till the name of Ist party workman was removed

from panel of Badli employee. He admits that in Exhibit M-1

Vijendra and Naagar were permanently appointed. They

were junior. The evidence of management’s witness Gopal

Verma and Joshi is on point that Ist party workman was

working as Badli. He was not appointed on regular basis.

That name of the workman was also continued on panel of

Badly peon till August, 1984. From evidence on record, it

is clear that workman was not appointed on regular basis.

The terms of reference are whether the termination of

services of Ist party workman is justified. The terms of

reference does not include that other junior Badli

employees were on regular appointment and the Ist party

workman was illegally terminated.

10. Learned counsel for IInd party Mr. Shashi relies

on ratio held in

“Case of Karnataka State Road Transport

Corporation Versus S. G. Kotturappa and another in

2005-3-Supreme Court Cases 409. Their Lordship held

that casual employment/labour Badli worker held so

long as worker remains Badli worker, he does not

enjoy a status and his services may be discontinued

like that of a probationer if he is not found suitable

for the job for which his services were utilised as

Badli. A dispute as regards purported wrongful

termination of services can be raised only if such

termination takes place in violation of mandatory

provisions of the statute or terms of contract

governing the services of the Badli worker

concerned.”

11. From evidence of Ist party workman, it is not

established that he had not completed 240 days

continuous service prior to the alleged termination,

evidence of the workman in cross-examination shows that

he was working for 10-15 days in a month during leave

vacancy. His evidence is not clear for how many days he

was working prior to the termination. Therefore violation

of Section 25-F of I.D. Act cannot be established.

12. Learned counsel for Ist party Mr. Gehlod relied

on ratio held in-

“Case of Samishta Dube versus City Board Etawah

and another in 1999 (81) FLR 746. The above cited

case was in respect of violation of 6-P, 6-N of U.P.

lndustrial Disputes Act is provided ordinarily

employees are retrenched employees following

principles of last come 1st go.”

Reliance is also placed by Shri Gehlod in ratio held

in case or Regional Manager, SBI versus Rakesh

Kumar Tewari reported in 2006-108-FLR-733. Their

Lordship held provisions of Section 25-G, B and H

does not require continuous employment of

workman within meaning of Section 25-B before he

could have been retrenched.

The ratio cannot be applied to present case at hand

as workman was not working as regular employee with the

IInd party Bank. He was working as Badli peon after his

name was sponsored from Employment Exchange. As per

ratio held in case of State Road Transport Corporation

Versus S.G. Kotturappa and another in 2005-3-Supreme

Court Cases 409 discussed above, the status and right of

Badli worker is as that of a probationer. Therefore the ratio

held in the above cited case cannot be applied to case at

hand. As the workman was not working regular employee

as Badli peon, the protection under Section 25-F, G and H

cannot be invoked by the workman. For the above reasons,

I record my finding on Point No.1 in Affirmative.

13. In the result, award is passed as under:—

“1.

The action of the IInd party management in

terminating the services of Shri Munnalal

Batham, S/o Shri Narayan Prasad is legal.

2.

Relief prayed by workman is rejected.”

R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4649

ubZ fnYyh] 9 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1646-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj iatkc us'kuy

cSad ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k

lhthvkbZVh@,ylh@vkj@62@2001) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh;

ljdkj dks 27-6-2013 dks izkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y& 12012@192@2000&vkbZ vkj(ch&II)º

lqefr ldykuh] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 9th July, 2013

S.O. 1646.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGIT/

LC/R/62/2001) of the Central Government Industrial

Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur now as shown in

the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the

employers in relation to the management of Punjab National

Bank and their workmen, which was received by the Central

Government on 27-6-2013.

[No. L-12012/192/2000-IR(B-II)]

SUMATI SAKLANI, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

JABALPUR

No. CGIT/LC/R/62/2001

Presiding Officer : SHRI R. B. P ATLE

Shri Narendra Chourasia,

S/o Tejilal Chourasia,

Near Chandsi Dava Khana,

Nehru Road,

Seoni(MP)

. . . Workman

Versus

The Branch Manager,

Punjab National Bank, Seoni Branch,

Distt. Seoni (MP)

. . . Management

AWARD

Passed on the 13th day of June, 2013

1. As per letter dated 22-3-2001 by the Government

of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is

received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under

Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.

L-120121192/2000-IR(B-II). The dispute under reference

relates to :

‘‘Whether the action of the Branch Manager, Punjab

National Bank, Seoni in stopping the services of

Shri Narendra Chourasia, Casual Labour w.e.f.

8-3-91 and not regularizing him on completion of 240

days as peon is justified? If not, what relief the

workman is entitled to?’’

2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to

the parties. Statement of claim is filed by workman at page

4/1 to 4/4. The case of Ist party workman is that he was

appointed on post of Daftary-cum-Peon from July, 1989 at

Seoni with approval of the Regional Manager. He was

working as Daftary cum peon since his appointment. He

was entrusted work to arrange vouchers and prepare

bundles etc. He was also entrusted to distribute bills and

all other work of peon such as to care the registers and

ledgers of the Bank. That IInd party is Industry. His services

are terminated from 8-3-91 without assigning any reasons.

Mandatory provisions of I.D. Act were not followed before

terminating his services. Principles of natural justice was

not followed. He was not served with notice or chargesheet.

His salary in lieu of notice was not paid to him. He was not

given opportunity for his defence.

3. Workman submitted that he had completed 240

days continuous service as daftary-cum-peon as provided

under Section 25(B) of I.D.Act. They have acquired status

of permanent employee. His services are terminated without

notice. He is not gainfully employed. On above contentions,

he prays for his reinstatement with back wages .

IInd party submitted Written Statement at Page 6/1

to 6/9. IInd party submits that the reference is not tenable.

The reference is misconceived. That the workman was

never engaged as peon on daily wages. He was

intermittently engaged to perform certain casual work for

cleaning or removing the stationery bodes for which he

was paid necessary paid at the agreed rates.· That the

service conditions of workmen staff in the Banking

Industry are governed by the provisions of the Sastri

Award, Desai Award and various bipartite settlements. As

per Para 16.9 of the Desai Award the service conditions of

the workman employed in the Banks are not applicable to

the provisions who are casual employees or who are

employed to do the job work. The reference is not tenable.

That the workman had intermittently worked for 106 days

from July, 89 to Feb, 1991. He had not completed 240 days

continuous service. That the workman was engaged as

daily wage for certain work. His services came to end at

the end of the day. His dis-continuance of servicedoesnot

amount to retrenchment under Section 2(oo )(bb) of the

LD.Act but it is covered under Section 2( oo )(bb) of I.D.Act.

On such grounds, IInd party prays for rejection of claim of

workman.

5. Considering pleadings on record, the points

which arise for my consideration and determination are as

4650

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

under. My findings are recorded against each of them for

the reasons as below :—

(i) Whether the action of the

In Negative

Branch Manager, Punjab

National Bank, Seoni in

stopping the services of

Shri Narendra Chourasia,

Casual Labour w.e.f. 8-3-91

and not regularizing him on

completion of 240 days as

peon is legal?

(i i) If so, to what relief the

Relief prayed by

workman is entitled to ?’’

workman are

rejected.

REASONS

6. That workman is challenging his termination

contending that he was continuously working from 1989

to 1991. His services were illegally terminated without

notice in violation of Section 25-F of I.D.Act. Workman

has not adduced any evidence. He is proceeded exparte

on 9-3-2011. Management has filed affidavit of witness

Shri D. M. Dwivedi. Management witness has stated that

workman was engaged as casual labour from July ,1989 to

February, 1991—total 106 days. His evidence remained

unchallenged. I donot find reason to disbelieve his

evidence. The evidence on record doesnot establish that

the services of workman are illegally terminated in violation

of Section 25-F of I.D.Act. For above reasons, I record my

finding in Point No.1 in Negative.

7. In the result, award is passed as under :—

(i)

The action of the Branch Manager, Punjab

National Bank, Seoni in stopping the services of

Shri Narendra Chourasia, Casual Labour w.e.f.

8-3-91 and not regularizing him on completion of

240 days as peon is legal.

(ii)

Relief prayed by workman are-rejected.

R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 9 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1647-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947

(1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj

Hkkjrh; thou chek fuxe ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj

muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;&I, fnYyh ds

iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 184@2011) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh;

ljdkj dks 4&7&2013 dks izkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y& 17012@70@96&vkbZ vkj(ch&II)º

lqefr ldykuh] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 9th July, 2013

S.O. 1647.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (I.D. No. 184/

2011) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, I, New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure,

in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation

to the management of Life Insurance Corporation of India

and their workmen, which was received by the Central

Government on 4-7-2013.

[No. L-17012/70/96-IR(B-II)]

SUMATI SAKLANI, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE DR. R. K. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER,

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL

NO.I, KARKARDOOMA COURTS COMPLEX, DELHI

I.D.No.184/2011

Shri S.M. Sawhney,

Through the General Secretary

Delhi Division Insurance Workers Organization

5230 Ajmeri Gate,

Delhi -110 006

. . . Workman

Versus

The Senior Divisional Manager,

Life Insurance Corporation of India,

Delhi Division No.1,

25, Kasturba Gandhi Marg,

New Delhi- 110 001

. . . Management

AWARD

During the period 1980—89, Life Insurance

Corporation of India (in short the Corporation) was

defrauded to the tune of Rs.834759.00 by its employees, by

way issuance of cheques on the strength of bogus

payment vouchers favouring non-existent persons, viz.

Gauri Shankar and Daya Ram. Matter was referred by the

Corporation to CBI for investigation. CBI conducted a

preliminary enquiry and registered RC No.1(s)/90/DLI on

31-01-1990. During the course of investigation, name of

Shri Surender Mohan Sawhney, the claimant, also figured

as an accused, besides others. In its report dated 30-04-

1992, CBI took steps for prosecution of Shri D.S. Pulsule,

retired Assistant of the Corporation for offences punishable

under Section 420, 468, 471, of the Penal Code and Section

13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act,

1988. Regular Departmental action for minor penalty was

recommended against S/Shri S.M. Jain, Surender Kumar,

Jagdish Mitter Sawhney, Joginder Lal Sharma and Smt.

Nalini M. Ratnam, while regular departmental action for

major penalty was recommended against the claimant,

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4651

besides 9 other employees. Show cause notice was served

on the claimant by the Corporation on 18-02-1994. Without

conducting an enquiry, punishment of Censure was

awarded to the claimant by the Disciplinary Authority. His

appeal also came to be dismissed.

2. Claimant had received two stagnation increments.

His third stagnation increment was deferred for one year

by the Corporation, since punishment of Censure was

awarded to him. Later on, his stagnation increment was

released with effect from 01-08-1995. Claimant

superannuated from service on 31-07-1996. After his

superannuation, he allegedly approached the Delhi

Division Insurance Workers' Organization (in short the

union) for redressal of his grievances. It was claimed that

the union raised a dispute before the Conciliation Officer.

Since the Corporation contested the claim, conciliation

proceedings ended into a failure. On consideration of failure

report, submitted by the Conciliation Officer, appropriate

Government referred the dispute to this Tribunal for

adjudication, vide order No.L-17012/70/96-IR(B-II),

New Delhi dated 06- 01-1998, with following terms :

“Whether action of the management of LIC of India

in imposing penalty of Censure and deferring the

stagnation increment for one year with effect from

01-08-1984 on Shri S.M. Sawhney, Higher Grade

Assistant, Serial No.102142, is legal and justified? If

not, to what relief is the workman entitled to and

from which date?”

3. Claim statement was filed on behalf of the claimant

pleading therein that he was working as Higher Grade

Assistant at Delhi Divisional Office of the Corporation prior

to his superannuation on 31-07-1996. Preparation,

maintenance and custody of transaction/cash book is the

sole responsibility of accounts department of the

Corporation. All payment vouchers are allotted serial

numbers in continuous order for each financial year. As

per normal practice, first copy of payment voucher is to be

retained in accounts department for future reference.

Authorized signatory is only required to verify the entry

made in the transaction/cash book with accompanied

cheque and payment voucher and then makes necessary

endorsements in the cash book. A number of financial

irregularities came to light during the course of special

audit of accounts department of the Corporation. Huge

financial loss was caused to the Corporation. Matter was

referred for investigation to CBI. Unfortunately, the

Corporation sought to enact a massive cover up operation

and found a few convenient scape-goats to whom relatively

minor or insignificant punishments were awarded. Show

cause notice dated 28-02-1994 was served on the claimant

after more than five years of issuance of cheques No.159033

and 157702 dated 16-03-1989 and 28-03-1989 respectively.

Claimant sought copies of transaction/cash book, cheques

and relevant payment vouchers vide letters dated

04-03-1994, 07-07-1994, 22-07-1994, 30-12-1994 and

11-02-1995. In complete violation of principles of natural

justice, these documents were not supplied to him. Regional

Manager wrote that payment vouchers were not necessary

for the purpose. Those documents were never supplied to

him. On the other hand, punishment of Censure was

awarded to him vide letter dated 07-12-1995. Claimant

preferred an appeal, which was rejected on 15-05-1996,

without passing speaking orders on the issues raised by

him.

4. Claimant had already received two stagnation

increments when aforesaid show cause notice was served

upon him. His third stagnation increment was due in 1990,

which in fact was not granted to him in spite of wage

agreement in the year 1995. He was informed vide letters

dated 09-04-1996 and 11-05-1996 that consideration of his

stagnation increment has been postponed by one year

since punishment of Censure was awarded to him. It has

been claimed that awarding of punishment of Censure was

against principles of natural justice and fair play.

Shri Sawhney is entitled for getting punishment of Censure

quashed and grant of third stagnation increment from due

date.

5. Claim was demurred by the Corporation pleading

that on his superannuation, Shri Sawhney ceased to be a

workman on 31-07-1996. Claim was raised on 31-03-1998,

which is an individual dispute. Corporation claims that the

dispute is liable to be rejected on this count alone. However,

his stagnation increment was deferred for a period of one

year upto 01-08-1995. Stagnation increment was released

in his favour with effect from 01-08-1995 and as such, claim

is liable to be dismissed.

6. Corporation projects that the claimant was

working as Higher Grade Assistant at Delhi Divisional Office

till the date of his retirement. His duties were to pass/sign

cheques on behalf of the Corporation, after verifying the

transaction from payment voucher, besides verification of

facts that it was properly and correctly recorded in the

transaction/cash book. Verification of record of transaction

before passing the cheque is a sort of internal check to

avoid frauds. Claimant signed and passed two cheques,

referred in his claim statement, without verifying that

necessary entries in cash book was recorded in that regard

from relevant payment voucher. When the claimant signed

and passed, above referred two cheques, various columns

in the cash book were lying incomplete. On account of

these lapses, payment of Rs.70,930.00 was made to fictitious

non-existent persons in fraudulent manner. Claimant

committed breach of Regulation No.21 and 24 of LIC Staff

Regulations (in short the Regulations). Show cause notice

was served on the claimant, who in his reply dated

11-02-1995 admits signing of those two cheques. He had

not commented upon factum of correct recording of entries

in cash book, in his reply. This has led to fraudulent

4652

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

payment of the amount, referred above. Though the

claimant deserves major penalty, yet only minor penalty

under the Regulations was levied, since he was at the fag

end of his service. Vouchers, demanded by the claimant,

were not required for proving his negligence. Since penalty

of Censure was awarded to him under Regulation 39, his

stagnation increment was deferred for a period of one year,

which was subsequently released. It has been projected

that there is no case in favour of the claimant. His claim

statement may be dismissed.

7. In rejoinder, facts pleaded in the claim statement,

have been reiterated.

8. Vide order No. Z-22019/6/2007-IR(C-II), New Delhi

dated 11-02-2008, case was transferred to Central

Government Industrial Tribunal No.II, New Delhi, for

adjudication by the appropriate Government. It was

retransferred to this Tribunal for adjudication vide order

No. Z-22019/6/2007-IR(C-II), New Delhi dated 30-03-2011

by the appropriate Government.

9. Claimant has examined himself in support of his

claim. Shri N.S. Verma, Manager (Admn.) was examined by

the Corporation. No other witness was examined by either

of the parties.

10.Arguments were heard at the bar. Claimant had

advanced arguments in person. Shri S.M. Bhatnagar,

authorised representative, presented facts on behalf of the

Corporation. Written submissions have been filed on

behalf of the parties. I have given my careful considerations

to the arguments advanced at the bar and cautiously

perused the record. My findings on issues involved in the

controversy are as follows :

11.First and foremost contention advanced by

Shri Bhatnagar is that the claimant superannuated on

31-07-1996. Thereafter, issue raised by him in the claim

statement nowhere reflects common interest of employees

of the Corporation. No resolution was passed by the union,

taking up his cause for redressal. Therefore, only an

individual dispute has been raised and this Tribunal has

no jurisdiction to adjudicate it. Contra to it, claimant agitates

that his dispute was espoused by the union vide letter

dated 06-04-1998. He argued that since the union took up

his cause, it does not lie in the mouth of the Corporation to

agitate that an individual dispute has been referred for

adjudication.

12.Since an incidental question has been raised by

the Corporation that the dispute referred is an individual

dispute, it becomes expedient to ascertain as to whether

the dispute is an industrial dispute. For an answer to this

proposition, definition of the term 'industrial dispute' is to

be construed. Section 2(k) of the Industrial Disputes Act,

1947 (in short the Act), defines the term 'industrial dispute',

which definition is extracted thus:

‘‘(k) ‘‘Industrial dispute’’ means any dispute or

difference between employers and employers, or

between employers and workmen, or between

workmen and workmen, which is connected with

the employment or non-employment or the terms

of employment or with the conditions of labour,

of any person.’’

13.The definition of ‘‘industrial dispute’’ referred

above, can be divided into four parts, viz. (i) factum of

dispute, (2) parties to the dispute, viz.(a) employers and

employers, (b) employer and workmen, or (c) workmen and

workmen, (3) subject matter of the dispute, which should

be connected with—(i) employment or non employment,

or (ii) terms of employment, or (iii) condition of labour of

any person, and (4) it should relate to an ‘‘industry’’.

14.The definition of ‘‘industrial dispute’’ is worded

in very wide terms and unless they are narrowed by the

meaning given to word ‘‘workman’’ it would seem to include

all ‘‘employers’’, all ‘‘employments’’ and all ‘‘workmen’’,

whatever the nature or scope of the employment may be.

Therefore, except in the case where there can be a dispute

between the employers and employers and workmen and

workmen, one of the parties to an industrial dispute must

be an employee or a class of employees. The first point,

therefore, to be noted, perhaps self evident, is that the

phrase ‘‘employer and workmen’’, the plural may include

singular on either side or any permutation of singular or

plural, the masculine including the feminine. In order,

therefore, to determine as to whether a controversy or

difference or a dispute is an ‘‘an industrial dispute’’ or not,

it must first be determined whether the workman concerned

or workmen sponsoring his cause satisfy the conditions of

clause (s) of section 2 of the Act. Here in the case, the

Corporation does not dispute that the claimant is workman

within the meaning of clause(s) of section 2 of the Act.

15.The Apex Court put gloss on the definition of

‘‘industrial dispute’’ in Dimakuchi Tea Estate [1958 (1) LLJ

500] and ruled that the expression "any person" in clause

(k) of section 2 of the Act must be read subject to such

limitation and qualification as arise from the context, the

two crucial limitations are (1) the dispute must be a real

dispute between the parties to the dispute (as indicated in

the first two parts of the definition clause) so as to be

capable of settlement or adjudication by one party to the

dispute giving necessary relief to other, and (2) the person

regarding whom the dispute is raised must be one for

whose employment, non employment, terms of employment

or conditions of labour, as case may be, the parties dispute

for a direct or substantial interest. Where workman raised a

dispute as against their employment, the person regarding

whose employment, non employer, terms of employment

or conditions of labour, the dispute is raised need not be

strictly speaking ‘‘workman’’ within the meaning of the

Act, but must be one in whose employment, non

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4653

employment, terms of employment, or conditions of labour

the workmen as a class have a direct or substantial interest.

The observations made by the Apex Court are to be

extracted thus:

‘‘We also agree with the expression ‘‘any person’’ is

not co-extensive with any workman, particular or

otherwise, equal with other, that the crucial test is

one of community of interest and the person

regarding whom the dispute is raised must be one in

whose employment, non employment, terms of

employment, conditions of labour (as the case may

be) the parties to the dispute have a direct or

substantial interest. Whether such direct or

substantial interest has been established in a

particular case will depend on its facts and

circumstances.’’

16. In Kyas Construction Company (Pvt ) Ltd. [1958

(2) LLJ 660], the Apex Court ruled that an industrial dispute

need not be a dispute between the employer and his

workman and that the definition of the expression

‘‘Industrial Dispute’’ is wide enough to cater a dispute

raised by the employer’s workman with regard to non

employment of others, who may not be employed as

workman at the relevant time. The Apex Court in Bombay

Union of Journalist [1961 (II) LLJ 436] has observed that in

each case in ascertaining whether an individual dispute

has acquired the character of an industrial dispute, the test

is whether at the date of reference, the dispute was taken

up as submitted by the union of the workmen of the

employer against whom, the dispute is raised by an

individual workman or by an appreciable number of

workmen. In order, therefore, to convert an individual

dispute into an industrial dispute, it has to be established

that it has been taken up by the union of employees of the

establishment or by an appreciable number of the

employees of the establishment. As far as union of the

workmen of establishment itself is concerned, the problem

of espousal by them generally presents little difficulty, since

such workmen who are members of such unions generally

have a continuity of interest with an individual employee

who is one of their fellow workman. But difficulty arise

when the cause of a workman, in a particular establishment

is sponsored by a union which is not of the workmen of

that establishment but is one of which membership is open

to workmen of their establishment as well as in that industry.

In such a case a union which has only microscopic number

of the workmen as its member, cannot sponsor any dispute

arising between the workmen and the management. A

representative character of the union has to be gathered

from the strength of the actual number of co-workers

sponsoring the dispute. The mere fact that a substantial

number of workmen of the establishment in which the

concerned workman was employee were also members of

the union would not constitute sponsorship. It must be

shown that they were connected together and arrived at

an understanding by a resolution or by other means and

collectively submitted the dispute.

17.The expression ‘‘industrial disputes’’ has been

construed by the Apex Court to include individual disputes,

because of the scheme of the Act. In Raghu Nath Gopal

Patvardhan [1957(1) LLJ 27] the Apex Court ruled as to

what dispute can be called as an industrial dispute. It was

laid thereon that (1) a dispute between the employer and a

single workman cannot be an industrial dispute, (2) it cannot

per-se be an industrial dispute but may become if it is taken

up by a trade union or a number of workmen. In Dharampal

Prem Chand [1965 (1) LLJ 668] it was commanded by the

Apex Court that a dispute raised by a single workman cannot

become an industrial dispute unless it is supported either

by his union or in the absence of a union by substantial

number of workmen. Same law was laid in the case of

Indian Express Newspaper (Pvt.) Limited [1970 (1) LLJ 132].

However in Western India Match Company [1970 (II) LLJ

256], the Apex Court referred the precedent in Dimakuchi

Tea Estate's case [1958 (1) LLJ 500)]and ruled that a dispute

relating to ‘‘any person becomes a dispute where the person

in respect of whom it is raised is one in whose employment,

non-employment, terms of employment or conditions of

labour, the parties, dispute for a direct or substantial

interest’’.

18.What a substantial or considerable number of

workmen would be in a given case, depend on particular

facts of the case. The fact that an ‘‘industrial dispute’’, is

supported by other workmen will have to be established

either in the form of a resolution of the union of which

workman may be member or of the workmen themselves

who support the dispute or in any other manner. From the

mere fact that a general union, at whose instance an

‘‘industrial dispute’’ concerning an individual workman is

referred for adjudication, has on its roll a few of the workmen

of the establishment as its members, it cannot be inferred

that the individual dispute has been converted into

an‘‘industrial dispute’’. The Tribunal has therefore, to

consider the question as to how many of the fellow workman

actually espoused the cause of the concerned workman by

participating in the particular resolution of the Union. In

the absence of such a determination by the Tribunal, it

cannot be said that the individual dispute acquired the

character of an industrial dispute and the Tribunal will not

acquire jurisdiction to adjudicate upon the dispute.

Nevertheless, in order to make a dispute an industrial

dispute, it is not necessary that there should always be a

resolution of substantial or appreciable number of workmen.

What is necessary is that there should be some express or

collective will of a substantial or an appreciable member of

the workmen treating the cause of the individual workman

as their own cause. Law to this effect was laid in

P.Somasundrameran [1970 (1) LLJ 558].

4654

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

19.It is not necessary that the sponsoring union is a

registered trade union or a recognized trade union. Once it

is shown that a body of substantial number of workmen

either acting through a union or otherwise had sponsored

the workman's cause, it is sufficient to convert it into an

industrial dispute. In Pardeep Lamp Works [1970 (1) LLJ

507] complaints relating to dispute of ten workmen were

filed before the Conciliation Officer by the individual

workmen themselves. But their case was subsequently

taken up by a new union formed by a large number of co-

workmen, if not a majority of them. Since this union was

not registered or recognized, the workmen elected five

representatives to prosecute the cases of ten dismissed

workmen. Thus cases of the dismissed workmen were

espoused by the new union, yet unregistered and

unrecognized. The Apex Court held that the fact that these

disputes were not taken up by a registered or recognized

union does not mean that they were not ‘‘industrial

dispute’’.

20.It is not expedient that same union should remain

incharge of that dispute till its adjudication. The dispute

may be espoused by the workmen of an establishment,

through a particular union for making such a dispute an

‘‘industrial dispute’’, while the workman may be

represented before the Tribunal for the purpose of Section

36 of the Act by a member of executive or office bearer of

altogether another union. The crux of the matter is that the

dispute should be a dispute between the employer and his

workmen. It is not necessary that the dispute must be

espoused or conducted only by a registered trade union.

Even if a trade union ceases to be registered trade union

during the continuance of the adjudication proceedings

that would not affect the maintainability of the order of

reference. Law to this effect was laid by the High Court of

Orissa in Gammon India Limited [1974 (II) LLJ 34]. For

ascertaining as to whether an individual dispute has

acquired character of an individual dispute, the test is

whether on the date of the reference the dispute was taken

up as supported by the union of the workmen of the

employer against whom the dispute is raised by the

individual workman or by an appreciable number of the

workman. In other words, the validity of the reference of an

industrial dispute must be judged on the facts as they

stood on the date of the reference and not necessarily on

the date when the cause occurs. Reference can be made to

a precedent in Western India Match Co.Ltd. [1970 (II) LLJ

256].

21.With above prelude in mind, now it would be

ascertained as to whether the dispute was espoused by

the union. Claimant testified during the course of his cross-

examination that his dispute was espoused by the union

vide letter dated 04-06-1998. On record, letter dated

06-041998 is there, which is an authority letter on the

strength of which claimant was authorized, besides others,

to represent the union in the present matter. For the sake

of convenience, contents of the said letter are reproduced

thus:

‘‘With reference to the above case, we, hereby,

authorize Shri S.M. Sawhney, Executive Member,

Northern Zone Insurance Workers Organization, Shri

Jagdish Prasad, General Secretary, DDIWO and Shri

O.P. Dhingra, General Secretary, Northern Zone

Insurance Workers Organization, to represent the

union in the above referred dispute’’.

22.As the above letter projects, it was written by

Shri Jagdish Prasad in the capacity of General Secretary of

the union. It is evident that the said authority letter was

issued by the General Secretary, authorizing the claimant,

Shri Jagdish Prasad, (General Secretary himself) and Shri

O.P. Dhingra to represent the union in the matter before

this Tribunal. It appears that in the evidence the claimant

inadvertently spelt the date of the letter as 04-06-1998

instead of 06-04-1998. It is crystal clear that this letter

nowhere projects that the union took up the cause of the

claimant for redressal of his grievance. It is not an espousal

of the case of the claimant before the authorities under the

Act.

23.How a case of an individual employee can be

espoused by the union or a considerable number of

workmen in the establishment of the employer has been

specifically provided by the Act as well as Industrial

Disputes (Central) Rules , 1957(in short the Rules). Sub-

section (2) of Section 10 of the Act projects that when

industrial dispute is applied in the prescribed manner to

the appropriate Government, if satisfied that the person

applying represents majority of each party, it shall make

reference accordingly. Rule 3 of the rules projects as to in

what form the application under sub-section (2) of Section 10

of the Act shall be made. Rule 4 provides as to who shall

sign the said application and its accompanying statements.

For sake of convenience provisions of the aforesaid rules

are reproduced thus :

‘‘3. Application—

An application under sub-section (2) of Section 10

for the reference of an industrial dispute to a Board,

Court, Labour Court, Tribunal or National Tribunal

shall be made in Form A and shall be delivered

personally or forwarded by registered post (1) to the

Secretary to the Government of India in the Ministry

of Labour and Employment (in triplicate), the Chief

Labour Commissioner (Central), New Delhi, and the

Regional Labour Commissioner (Central), and the

Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central)

concerned. The application shall be accompanied

by a statement setting forth—

(a) the parties to the dispute;

(b) the specific matters in dispute;

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4655

(c) the total number of workmen employed in the

undertaking affected;

(d) an estimate of the number of workmen affected

or likely to be affected by the dispute; and

(e) the efforts made by the parties themselves to

adjust the dispute.

4. Attestation of application

The application and the statement accompanying, it

shall be signed :

(a) in the case of an employer by the employer

himself, or when the employer is an

incorporated company or other body

corporate, by the agent, manager or other

principal officer of the Corporation;

(b) in the case of workmen, either by the President

and Secretary of a trade union of the workmen,

or by five representatives of the workmen duly

authorised in this behalf at a meeting of the

workmen held for the purpose;

(c) in the case of an individual workman, by the

workman himself or by any officer of the trade

union of which he is a member or by another

workman in the same establishment duly

authorised by him in this behalf :

Provided that such workman is not a member of a

different trade union.’’

24.Bare reading of the aforesaid rules makes it

apparent that the application in case of workmen shall be

signed either by the President and Secretary of the trade

union or by five representatives of the workmen duly

authorised in that behalf at a meeting of the workmen held

for the purpose. In case of dispute relating to dismissal,

discharge, retrenchment or otherwise termination of the

workman by his employer, the application may be signed

by the individual workmen himself or any an officer of the

trade union or by another workman in the same

establishment duly authorised by him in this behalf. As

facts project, it is not a case where a dispute relating to

dismissal, discharge, retrenchment or otherwise termination

of the service of the claimant has been raised. Therefore,

application in raising the dispute was to be signed either

by the President and Secretary of the union or by five

representatives of the workmen duly authorised in that

behalf at a meeting of the workmen held for the purpose.

Claimant deposed that his dispute was espoused by the

union vide letter dated 04-06-1998 (wrongly mentioned as

06-04-1998 in the evidence). When letter dated 6-04-1998

is perused, it is evident that this document nowhere speaks

about resolution made by the union espousing cause of

the claimant before the authorities, authorizing its President

and Secretary or five representatives in that behalf to sign

the application for raising the dispute. Evidently, letter

dated 06-04-1998 does not meet the requirements of law.

25.Even otherwise, letter dated 6-04-1998 is of no

consequence. The union can espouse a case on the date

when the industrial dispute was raised before the authorities

under the Act and not at a later date. Validity of an industrial

dispute is to be judged on facts as they stood on the date

of reference. Here in the case, reference of the dispute was

made by the appropriate Government on 6-01-1998.

Consequently, espousal of the dispute can be either prior

to 6-01-1998 or on 6-01-1998 and not thereafter. As deposed

by the claimant, his dispute was espoused by the union on

06-04-1998. On that date, espousal of the dispute by the

union would not accord it status of an industrial dispute.

No evidence is there on the record to the effect that the

union or considerable number of the workmen in the

establishment of the Corporation expressed their collective

will to take up the cause of the claimant as their own. No

evidence as to passing of a resolution or expression of

collective will of the workmen has been brought over the

record. Hence, claimant could not bring any evidence to

show that the dispute acquired character of an industrial

dispute. Therefore, it is crystal clear that the dispute

referred for adjudication by the appropriate Government

nowhere answers the parameters of an industrial dispute.

26.Unfortunately, full dress trial was conducted.

Evidence of the claimant on merits of the case was taken.

The Corporation examined Shri Verma to rebut evidence of

the claimant. When matter was considered, it was found to

be a case of no enquiry. However, the Corporation had

adduced evidence relating to misconduct committed by

the claimant. But when finding has been recorded to this

effect that it was an individual dispute, it would not be in

the fitness of things to proceed with further adjudication.

Consequently, I refrain my hands from adjudication of the

matter on merits.

27.As pointed out above, an individual dispute has

been referred for adjudication to this Tribunal. The

appropriate Government was incompetent to refer an

individual dispute for adjudication under Section 10(1)(d)

of the Act. This Tribunal cannot invoke its jurisdiction to

adjudicate the dispute, since it has not acquired character

of an industrial dispute. Resultantly, the Tribunal refrain

its hands from adjudicating the matter, with an observation

that the appropriate Government was not competent to

refer the dispute and the Tribunal has not acquired any

jurisdiction to adjudicate it. An award is, accordingly,

passed. It be sent to the appropriate Government for

adjudication.

Dr. R. K. YADAV, Presiding Officer

Dated : 19-06-2013

4656

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ubZ fnYyh] 10 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1648-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj tujy eSustj]

oSdy iQSDVªh ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa

ds chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k lh-th-vkbZ-

Vh-@,y-lh-@vkj-@223@91) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj

dks 28&6&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y&14011@01@1987&Mh&II (ch)º

lkse ukFk] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the10th July, 2013

S.O. 1648.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGIT/

LC/R/223/91) of the Central Government Industrial

Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the

Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers

in relation to the management of The General Manager,

Vehicle Factory and their workman which was received

by the Central Government on 28-6-2013.

[ F. No. L-14011/01/1987-D-II(B)]

SOM NATH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

JABALPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/R/223/91

SHRI R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer.

The President,

Vehicle Factory Mazdoor Union, H.No.2798,

Vehicle Factory Estate,

Jabalpur

. . . Workman/Union

Versus

The General Manager,

Vehicle Factory,

Jabalpur

. . . Management

AWARD

Passed on this 17th day of April 2013

1. As per letter dated 27-11-91 by the Government of

India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is

received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under

Section 10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.L-14011/

1/87-D.II(B). The dispute under reference relates to :

“ Whether the demand of Vehicle Factory Mazdoor

Union, Jabalpur in asking seniority of Shri

K.D.Pathak and others ( total 23 employees- list

enclosed) by counting their services rendered as

Checker by counting their services rendered as

checker equivalent to LDC for promotion of UDC is

justified? If yes, what relief these workmen are

entitled to?”

2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to

the parties. 1st party workman submits their Statement of

claim. It is case of the 1st party workman that those 23

employees shows in the annexure were working as

checkers since 1972 in IInd party. That because of

Administrative reasons, the post of checkers were

abolished around 1-4-80. That from 1-1-1973, the

Commission recommended scale of Rs. 225-308 for

checkers, 264-400 for LDCs. The said pay scale was given

to checker from 1-1-1973. In IVth Pay Commission, pay

scales were changed. Persons who have joined after the

applicant as LDCs have been given promotions as UDCs

without considering seniority/length of service. The

applicant’s claim that the 1st party workman were senior

to the UDC promoted in the year 1977 to 1980, they be

given seniority of the period they were working as

checkers. It is further contended that the duties performed

by checkers and LDCs are identical. The 1st party workman

has also explained delay in filing reference as they were

required to file miscellaneous petition No. 1471/88 even

after failure report no action was taken for 2 years. After

direction in Writ Petition, the Government refused to make

reference. The reference was made only after issuing

directions in Miscellaneous Petition No. 270/90. 1st party

prays for considering seniority of those 23 employees

working as checker during the period 1972 onwards.

3. IInd party filed Written Statement at Page 5/1 to

5/8. The contentions of Hnd party are that initially 1st

party were working as checkers from 1972 onwards. The

seniority was granted in grade of LDC. That in pursuance

of instructions contained in letter dated 28-5-62, giving

seniority was discontinued. The seniority was directed to

be given as per letter dated 2-8-72. It is submitted that the

checkers getting salary of minimum pay scale of LDC was

given seniority from such date. It is submitted that the

applicants/workmen are not entitled to seniority claimed

by them for promotion to the post of LDC from 1972 i.e.

their initial appointment as checkers. Rest of the contention

of the 1st party workmen are denied.

4. It is submitted that Mr. M.Uttaman, LDC was

appointed from checker to LDC w.e.f. 8-8-72. That as per

letter dated 8-8-72, his seniority in the grade of LDC was

considered from the date of crossing minimum basic pay

of LDC. That 12 employees were considered for scrutiny

and 3 of them were granted seniority as LDC. It is further

submitted that the checkers appointed after 22-5-72 to LDC

during 1979, 1980 are not. entitled to seniority and upgrade

of LDC. IInd party prayed for rejection of claim of 1st

party workmen.

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4657

5. Considering pleadings on record, the points which

arise for my consideration and determination are as under.

My findings are recorded against each of them for the

reasons as below :—

(i)

Whether the demand of Vehicle

In Negative

Factory Mazdoor Union, Jabalpur.

In asking seniority of Shri K. D.

Pathak and others ( total 23

employees—list enclosed) by

counting their services rendered

as Checker by counting their

services rendered as checker

equivalent to LDC for promotion

of UDC is justified?

(ii)

If so, to what relief the workman is

Demand of

entitled to?

1st party

are rejected.

REASONS

6. Though the 1st party workmen has submitted

statement of claim, they failed to adduce evidence in

support of their demands. Even some of the employee

died, their LRs are not brought on record. As seen from

the ordersheet, Union did not participate to substantiate

its demand under reference. Management also didnot

adduce any evidence. Since both parties are not

participating in the hearing of the matter, it appears that

the demands under reference are not pursued by the Union.

For want of evidence, I record my finding on Point No.1 in

Negative.

7. In the result, award is passed as under :—

(1) The demand of Vehicle Factory Mazdoor Union,

Jabalpur in asking seniority of Shri K.D.Pathak and others

( total 23 employees- list enclosed) by counting their

services rendered as Checker by counting their services

rendered as checker equivalent to LDC for promotion of

UDC is not just and proper.

(2) Demand ofIst party are rejected.”

R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 10 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1649-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj tujy eSustj]

xu dSfjt iQSDVªh ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds

deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh;

ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k lh-

th-vkbZ-Vh-@,y-lh-@vkj-@173@91) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh;

ljdkj dks 28&6&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y&14012@24@1991&vkbZ vkj (Mh;w)º

lkse ukFk] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the10th July, 2013

S.O. 1649.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGIT/

LC/R/173/91) of the Central Government Industrial

Tribunal-cum Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the

Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the General

Manager, Gun Carriage Factory and their workman which

was received by the Central Government on 28-6-2013.

[ No. L-14012/24/1991-IR (DU)]

SOM NATH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

JABALPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/R/173/91

Shri R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer.

Shri Anil Kumar Jha,

Ex- T.No.1160/ I.E-Jr.Examiner,

C/o Sushma Pandey,

372/2, Hawabagh Rly. Colony,

Gorakhpur, Jabalpur

. . . Workman

Versus

General Manager,

Gun Carriage factory,

Jabalpur

. . . Management

AWARD

Passed on this 4th day of March 2013

1. As per letter dated 26-9-91 by the Government of

India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is

received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under

Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.

L-14012/24/91-IR(DU) dated 26-9-91. The dispute under

reference relates to :—

“Whether the action of the management of Gun’

Carriage Factory, Jabalpur (MP) is justified in

terminating the services of Shri Anil Kumar Jha, Ex-

T. NO. 1160/I.E-Jr. Examiner, w:e,f. 5-4-85 ? If not, to

what relief he is entitled?”

2. After receipt of reference, notices were issued to

the parties. 1st party/workman submitted his statement of

claim at Page 3/1 to 3/5 of the record. As per statement of

claim, the case of 1st party/workman is that he was working

as Junior Examiner in IInd party/GCF, Jabalpur. His service

record was excellent. He was never punished. Chargesheet

was issued on 25-6-84 on the allegation that on 13-6-84 at

about 9 PM, he was apprehended by Sepoy Narain Singh

4658

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

while stiching the mouth of a bag filled with non-ferrous

turnings/barings scrap in the brass scrap in the Vijayanta

Vibhag Area weighing about 111.50 Kg. for taking out of

the factory. That he had denied the charges. Departmental

Enquiry was ordered against him. On the basis of findings

of DE, as per order dated 5-4-85 issued by the General

Manager, Gun Carriage Factory, Jabalpur. He had preferred

appeal challengIng said order. His appeal was rejected.

“3. 1st party/workman challenges order of his

removal on the ground that alongwith chargesheet, copies

of witnesses were not supplied to him. Consequently he

could not submit proper reply to the chargesheet. That

enquiry was not properly conducted. The Enquiry Officer

acted as prosecutor to see that charges are proved. That

evidence of the witnesses had admitted certain facts.

Those admission were not considered by the Enquiry

Officer. That Shri R.L.Prasad witness No.1 was not

examined in Enquiry, his statement was not recorded before

Enquiry Officer. Only his previous statement was admitted.

Findings of Enquiry Officer are perverse and contrary to

the evidence on record. The Enquiry officer based his

findings on presumption as such illegal. However

Appellate Authority acted mechanically while rejecting

his appeal. The order of Appellate Authority is contrary to

the provisions of CCS(CCA)Rules. That there was no

evidence to prove the charges. The Enquiry Officer cross-

examined witnesses of the Ilnd party without justification.

The Enquiry Officer imported his personal knowledge while

recording his findings. The findings of Enquiry Officer

are illegal. 1st party therefore prays for his reinstatement

with back wages.

4. IInd party filed Written Statement at Page 6/1 to

6/7. The IInd party denied all the contention of the 1st

party. It is not necessary to submit statement of witnesses

alongwith charge sheet. The statements of witnesses were

supplied during course of enquiry. IInd party has narrated

incident that on 13-6-84, 1st party/workman was found

near the brass scrap in the Vijayanta Vibhag area between

7 to 9 PM. He was found with scrap filled in the bag

attempting to commit theft. He was produced before

Security. 1st party/workman was suspended. Charge sheet

was issued to him for gross misconduct of attempt to

commit theft of Govt. property. That the allegation of 1st

party about enquiry conducted against him are not fair

and proper and denied by the IInd party. That to find out

truth, Enquiry Officer has cross-examined witnesses.

During enquiry, it was found that 1st party was missing

from his place of work. He was found at Watch Tower No.

14 standing near brass scrap heap. The misconduct of 1st

party is proved in enquiry from evidence of the witnesses.

The findings of the Enquiry Officer are supported by

evidence and as such not perverse. The IInd party further

contended that the rules under Article 309 under

constitution are governing the employees of IInd party.

Therefore the reference under I.D . Act is not tenable. IInd

party has also referred to ratio held in different cases on

the point of imposing penalty and powers of the Industrial

Court. It is submitted that removal of 1st party is legal.

The claim of 1st party for reinstatement cannot be allowed.

5. 1st party/workman submitted rejoinder at Page

8/1 to 8/3 retreating the ground in his statement of claim. It

is submitted that it is mandatory to supply copy of

statement along with charge sheet. That Enquiry Officer

cross-examined management’s witnesses. The reference

is tenable as provisions of I.D. Act relates to adjudication

of dispute where as Rules under Article 309 of constitution

deals with the service conditions of the employees.

6. Considering pleadings between the parties,

preliminary issue about whether the enquiry held against

1st party/workman is just and legal was decided after

hearing argument by my predecessor. Vide order. dated

24-1-96, the Enquiry held against 1st party/workman was

found just and proper. In view of enquiry against 1st party

is legal, the other issues needs to be decided & my findings

are recorded against each of them for the reasons as

below :—

(i)

whether the findings of

In Affirmative

the Enquiry Officer are

supported by satisfactory

evidence?

(ii)

whether the punishment

In Affirmative

of removal of 1st party is

legal ?

(iii)

To what relief, the workman

Ist party/workman

is entitled ?

is not entitled

to reinstatment

REASONS

7. Record of enquiry Proceedings is submitted. On

its careful reading, I find that 7 witnesses were examined

for proving charges against 1st party. Their evidence is

recorded in detail. The enquiry is found legal. Learned

counsel of 1st party Mr. Shashi did not advance any

argument on the point and the findings of the Enquiry

Officer are supported by satisfactory evidence. I have

carefully gone through the record of enquiry and find that

there is sufficient evidence to prove charges against 1st

party/workman. Therefore I record my finding on Point

No.1 in affirmative.

8. As to Point No.2 , learned counsel for 1st party

Mr. Shashi submits that 1st party/workman is no more.

That pensionary benefits may be allowed to the dependents

of 1st party. Invoking powers under Section 11 A of I.D .

Act, learned counsel for IInd party Mr. Shankaran Nair

opposed the submissions on behalf of 1st party. Mr. Nair

taken view to the charges proved in enquiry against 1st

party. Learned counsel further submits that charges against

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4659

1st party are proved. There are no allegations for malafide

part of IInd party therefore provisions of Section 11-A of

I.D. Act is not attracted. That charge of attempt of theft of

111.50 Kg. Brass scrap are proved. Such act cannot be

tolerated. Therefore punishment imposed by Competent

authority cannot be interfered. In support of his argument,

learned counsel for IInd party relies on ratio held in case

of Jantha Bazar (South Kanara Central Cooperative

Wholesale Stores Ltd.) and other versus Secretary,

Sahakari Noukarara Sangha and others reported in 2000

(7) Supreme Court Cases 517 . Their Lordship of Apex

Court dealing with powers under Section 11- A of I.D.Act—

Scope of Judicial review held the discretion of employer

exercised in imposing penalty after misconduct proved in

domestic enquiry held Labour Court cannot substitute

the penalty imposed by the employer. Next reliance is

placed in the case of General Secretary, South Indian

Cashew Factories Workers Union Vrs. Managing Director,

Kerala State Cashew Development Corporation Ltd. and

Others reported in AIR 2006 (SC) Page 2208. Their Lordship

held that powers of Labour Court under Section 11-A to

interfere in punishment when no allegations of

victimization or malafide or unfair labour practice there is

clear finding that findings are not perverse and principles

of natural justice were complied with while conducting

enquiry. Labour Court has no power to interfere with

punishment imposed by management. Since Section 11-A

is not applicable to case other than dismissal or discharge

Labour Court has no power to reappraise evidence to

findout whether findings of Enquiry Officer are correct or

not or whether punishment imposed is adequate or not. In

case of workman of Balmadies Estates Versus Management

of Balmadies Estates and others reported in Case No.

2008(4) SCC-Pg. 517. Their Lordship of Apex Court dealing

with interference by Labour Court, Tribunal. Their Lordship

considered two workmen dismissed from service for

committing theft, on completion of enquiry, Labour Court

held that there was no direct evidence to show that the

two workmen had committed theft. Evidence was not

properly appreciated by Enquiry Officer and finding of

guilt was based on very slender evidence. Lordship held

on facts, findings of Labour Court were perverse and can

be termed to be based on misconception of law. High Court,

therefore, rightly observed that the evidence could not

have been brushed aside by Labour Court in the manner

done.

9. In the present case, there is absolutely no

argument that whether the findings of the Enquiry Officer

are supported by evidence in the enquiry proceedings.

Considering the charge of attempt of commit theft of 111.50

Kg. Brass scrap proved against 1st party, I find no reason

to interfere the punishment of his removal. On the above

reason, I record my findings in Point No.2 &3 as Negative.

10. In the result, Award is passed as under—

“Punishment of removal of 1st party/workman

imposed by the IInd party/management is just and

legal. Workman is not entitled to reinstatement

neither his dependents are entitiled to pensionary

benefits. Claim of 1st party is rejected.

R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 10 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1650-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj egkizca/d

LD;ksfjVh isij fey] gks'kaxkckn ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj

muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ

la[;k lh-th-vkbZ-Vh-@,y-lh-@vkj-@46@05) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS

tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 28&6&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y&16011@01@2005&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)º

lkse ukFk] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the10th July, 2013

S.O. 1650.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGIT/

LC/R/46/05) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal

-cum- Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure

in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation

to the management of The General Manager, Security

Paper Mill, Hoshangabad, which was received by the

Central Government on 28-6-2013.

[ No. L-16011/01/2005-IR (DU)]

SOM NATH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

JABALPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/R/46/05

Shri R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer.

The General Secretary,

SPM Employees Union,

Type-II/ 63, Phase-II,

SPM, Hoshangabad

. . .Workman/Union

Versus

The General Manager,

Security Paper Mill,

Hoshangabad.

. . . Management

AWARD

Passed on this 15th day of March, 2013

1. As per letter dated 26-5-2005 by the Government

of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is

4660

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under

Section 10 of the I.D. Act, 1947 as per Notification No.

L-16011/1/2005-IR(DU) dateed 26-5-2005. The dispute

under reference relates to :

“ Whether the action of the management of General

Manager, Security Paper Mill, Hoshangabad in not

giving promotion as a Senior Foreman in E & I

Section and not giving benefits to Shri B.K.Gupta

since 1983 upto till date is justified? If not, to what

relief the workman is entitled for?”

2. After notice, 1st party/workman failed to appear

and submit statement of claim. 1st party is proceeded

exparte on 10-9-09. IInd party filed Written Statement. IInd

party submits that 1st party workman was appointed as

Electrician Higher Scale Gr.II in the scale of pay Rs.330-8-

390. He had filed an application under Section 15 of

Payment of Wages Act before Labour Court No.2 Bhopal

in 1986 claiming amount Rs. 3615.50 towards difference of

wages for the period. His application was dismissed. The

1st party preferred appeal against the said order. The said

appeal was decided by Industrial Court, Bhopal on

10-9-98. The appeal was allowed. Ilnd party filed Writ

Petition No. 1842/99. However during pendency of Writ

Petition, wages Rs.ll,212 were paid.

3. IInd party further submits that 1st party workman

was working as Electrician in Electrical Section when the E

& I Section was newly created due to modernization. 1st

party/workman had worked for 5 months and 5 days and

he was transferred to his original section. He is not fulfilling

the eligibility for promotion post claimed by him. Such

post requires 2 year experience. IInd party prays for

rejection of the claim of 1st party.

4. Ist party has not filed statement of claim nor

produced any evidence. Ilnd party filed evidence of his

witness Shri Mahapatra denying claim of the 1st party

covering all contention in the Written Statement filed by

Ilnd party. There is absolutely no evidence for establishing

claim of 1st party for permanent post. Therefore the claim

of 1st party deserves to be rejected.

5. In the result, award is passed as under:-

“ The demand of 1st party workman under reference

is not supported by any evidence of 1st party

workman. His claim is rejected.”

R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 10 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1651-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj iatkc ,.M

fla/ cSad ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds

chp vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;&I] fnYYkh ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 18@2009)

dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 10&7&2013 dks çkIr

gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y&12011@91@2008&vkbZvkj (ch&II)º

lqefr ldykuh] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the10th July, 2013

S.O. 1651.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (I.D. No. 18/2009)

of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour

Court-I, New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the

Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to

the management of Punjab and Sind Bank and their

workman which was received by the Central Government

on 10-7-2013.

[ No. L-12011/91/2008-IR(B-II)]

SUMATI SAKLANI, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE DR. R. K. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER,

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIL TRIBUNAL

NO. 1, KARKARDOOMA COURTS COMPLEX,

DELHI

I.D. No. 18/2009

Shri Yashwant Bhandari through

Uttranchal Bank Workers Organisation,

32, Chakrata Road,

Dehradun.

. . . Workman

Versus

The Zonal Manager,

Punjab and Sind Bank,

Regional Office, A. K. Road,

Dehradun.

. . . Management

AWARD

A Computer Terminal Operator was transferred to

Haridwar branch from Rishikesh branch of Punjab and

Sindh Bank (in short the bank) in July, 2004. Rishikesh

branch of the bank falls under Distt. Dehradun while

Haridwar branch is within the territory of Distt. Haridwar,

Uttarakhand. The Computer Terminal Operator raised a

demand for his re-transfer to Rishikesh branch. It was not

conceded to by the bank. He demanded lump sum of

Rs. 400 per month in accordance with Schedule VI

appended to the 8th Bipartite Settlement. This demand

was also not conceded to. He approached the Uttaranchal

Bank Workers’ Organization (in short the union) for

redressal of his grievance. The union approached the

Conciliation Officer, before that forum too, the claim was

contested. Since the conciliation proceedings ended into

a failure, the Conciliation Officer transmitted his report to

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4661

the appropriate Government. On consideration of report

of the Conciliation officer, the appropriate Government

referred the dispute to Central Government Industrial No.

II, New Delhi, for adjudication, vide order No. L-12011/91/

2008-IR(B-II), New Delhi dated 05-02-2009, with following

terms :

“Whether the action of the management of Punjab

and Sindh Bank in denying transfer to Shri Yashwant

Bhandari, CTO, Haridwar branch back to Rishikesh

Branch from where he was transferred or to a nearby

branch after reaching to the age of 58 years and also

depriving him payment of Rs.400.00 as displacement

allowance from the date he joined his duties at

Haridwar brahch is legal and justified ? What relief

the concerned employee is entitled?”

2. Claim statement was filed by the Computer Terminal

Operator, namely, Shri Yashwant Bhandari pleading that

he was transferred to Haridwar branch of the bank in July ,

2004 from Rishikesh branch to Haridwar branch,

Uttarakhand. He raised a demand for his retransfer to

Rishikesh branch of the bank, which demand was avoided

by the bank. Lump sum amount of Rs.400.00 per month

was also not paid to him. Vide letter dated 26-10-2007, he

made such a demand, which was declined by the Zonal

Manager. He raised a demand through the union before

the Conciliation Officer. Conciliation proceedings resulted

into a failure. It has been claimed that an award, granting

lump sum of Rs. 400.00 per month from July, 2004 to August

2008 may be passed in his favour.

3. Claim was demurred by the bank pleading that he

was transferred to Haridwar branch in July, 2004. Settlement

vis-a vis deployment allowance was signed between the

bank and majority Union on 02-06-2005, which was effective

from the date of signing the settlement. In view of these

facts, claimant is not entitled to relief claimed. Concept of

deployment was brought into vogue by the 7th Bipartite

settlement wherein bank was empowered to identify

pockets of surplus/deficit in areas of operation in different

centres. Imbalances in deployment of staff are corrected

by the bank by way of settlement at each bank level. 8th

Bipartite settlement provided that deployment of non-

subordinate staff shall be made in accordance with terms

and conditions set forth under Schedule VI of that

settlement. Since there was no identification of pockets of

surplus/deficit areas of operation, no specific policy to

govern the deployment was brought into application.

4. Bank further pleads that the union espousing the

cause has a microscopic strength of only 28 workmen and

as such espousal is not by substantial number of

employees. These facts make it apparent that the dispute

is not an Industrial Dispute. Claimant was promoted on

01.09.2008 and ceased to be a workman. He was transferred

to Rishikesh branch, on 01-09-2008 and his dispute has

become infructuous. It has been claimed that facts pleaded

by the claimant may be discarded and an award be passed

in favour of the bank.

5. On pleadings of the parties, following issues were

settled :—

(1)

Whether the workman is entitled to deployment

allowance of Rs. 400.00 per month from July, 2004

to 31.08.2008 ?

(2)

As in terms of reference.

(3)

Relief.

6. Vide notification No.A-11016/3/2009-CLS-II, New

Delhi dated 03.04.2013, additional charge of the post of

the Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial

Tribunal No. II, New Delhi, was assigned to the

undersigned by the appropriate Government and thus the

case reached this Tribunal for adjudication.

7. Claimant tendered his affidavit dated 29-04-2010

as evidence. However, he did not come forward to undergo

rigors of cross-examination. Hence, no opportunity could

be accorded to the bank to purify facts detailed by the

claimant in his affidavit, by an ordeal of cross-examination.

Since the bank could not avail opportunity of cross-

examination, facts detailed in affidavit dated 29.04.2010

cannot be read in evidence.

8. Since there was no evidence from the side of the

claimant in that regard, the bank also opted not to adduce

any evidence in the matter.

9. Arguments are heard at the bar Ms. Kitu Bajaj,

authorized representative, advanced arguments on behalf

of the bank. None came forward to raise submissions on

behalf of the claimant. I have given my careful

consideration to the arguments advanced at the bar and

cautiously perused the record. My findings on issues

involved in the contraversy are as follows :—

Issue No. 1

10. Though there is no, evidence on behalf of the

claimant, yet facts pleaded by him are not in dispute. It

has been highlighted by the claimant. that he was

transferred from Rishikesh branch to Haridwar branch of

the bank in July 2004, which fact has been candidly

admitted by the bank in its written statement. He also

raised an issue that 8th Bipartite settlement entitles him

for grant of lump sum amount of Rs. 400 per month, on his

transfer from one district to another. Signing of the Bipartite

Settlement and grant of lump sum amount, on being

deployed to another district are also not a matter of dispute.

Consequently, it is evident that these admitted facts would

lead this Tribunal to articulate of the controversy in a just

manner.

11. Now, before proceeding for adjudication, the

Tribunal is required to adjudicate an incidental issue. In

4662

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

its written statement, the bank pleads that the union

espousing the cause of the claimant has a microscopic

strength of only 28 employees, constituting barely 0,8%

of total number of workmen in the organization. It has

been asserted that in the absence of necessary espousal

by substantial number of employees, no industrial dispute

exists between the parties. As projected above, the bank

had also not adduced any evidence in the matter. Above

pleadings make it apparent that espousal of the claim by

the union is not a disputed fact. The bank asserts that the

union has only microscopic strength of only 28 workmen.

Hence question for consideration would be as to whether

the dispute raised by the appropriate Government for

adjudication is an industrial dispute. For an answer to this

proposition, definition of the term ‘industrial dispute’ is to

be construed. Section 2(k) of the Industrial Disputes Act,

1947 (in short the Act), defines the term ‘industrial dispute’.

which definition .is extracted thus :

“2(k) “Industrial dispute” means any dispute or

difference between employers and employers, or

between employers and workmen, or between

workmen and workmen, which is connected with

the employment or non-employment or the terms of

employment or with the conditions of labour, of any

person;”

The definition of “industrial dispute” referred above,

can be divided into four parts, viz. (1) factum of dispute,

(2) parties to the dispute, viz.(a) employersand employers,

(b) employer and workmen, or (c) workmen and workmen,

(3) subject matter of the dispute, which should be

connected with—(i) employment or non employment, or

(ii) terms of employment, or (iii) condition of labour of any

person, and (4) it should relate to an “industry”.

13. The definition of “industrial dispute” is worded

in very wide terms and unless they are narrowed by the

meaning given to word ‘‘workman” it would seem to

include all ‘‘employers” all ‘‘employment’’ and all

‘‘workmen”, whatever the nature or scope of the

employment may be. Therefore, except in the case where

there can be a dispute between the employers and

employers and workmen and workmen, one of the parties

to an industrial dispute must be an employee or a class of

employees. The first point, therefore, to be noted, perhaps

self evident, is that the phrase “employer and workmen”,

the plural may include singular on either side or any

permutation of singular or plural, the masculine including

the feminine. In order, therefore, to determine as to whether

a controversy or difference or a dispute is an “an industrial

dispute’’ or not, it must first be determined whether the

workman concerned or workmen sponsoring his cause

satisfy the conditions of clause (s) of section 2 of the Act.

14. Here in the case, the bank dispute that the

claimant has ceased to be a workman within the meaning

of clause of Section 2 of the Act. As per facts pleaded by

the parties, the claimant was working as a Computer

Terminal Operator in the bank when he was transferred

from Rishikesh bank to Haridwar branch of the bank. He

was promoted as an Officer on 1-9-2008. In the dispute,

under consideration, benefits for the period from July 2004

to 31st August, 2008 are to be adjudicated. Thus it is

evident that the benefits, which are to be articulated,

pertains to the period when claimant was working as a

Computer Terminal Operator. There is no dispute that he

was a workman, when the claimant was performing duties

of a Computer Terminal Operator. It would not make any

difference that from 1-9-2008, the claimant ceased to be a

workman. The objection is, accordingly, discarded.

15. The Apex Court put gloss on the definition of

“industrial dispute” in Dimakuchi Tea Estate (1958 (1) LLJ

500) and ruled that the expression “any person” in clause

(k) of Section 2 of the Act must be read subject to such

limitation and qualification as arise from the context, the

two crucial limitations are (i) the dispute must be a real

dispute between the parties to the dispute (as indicated in

the first two parts of the definition clause) so as to be

capable of settlement or adjudication by one party to the

dispute giving necessary relief to other, and (2) the person

regarding whom the dispute is raised must be one for

whose employment, non employment, terms of employment

or conditions of labour, as case may be, the parties dispute

for a direct or substantial interest. Where workman raised

a dispute as against their employment, the person

regarding whose employment, non employer, terms of

employment or conditions of labour, the dispute is raised

need not be strictly speaking “workman” within the

meaning of the Act, but must be one in whose employment,

non employment, terms of employment, or conditions of

labour the workmen as a class have adirect or substancial

interest. The observations made by the Apex Court are to

be extracted thus :

"We also agree with the expression "any person" is

not co extensive with any workman, particular or

otherwise, equal with other, that the crucial test is

one of community of interest and the person

regarding whom the dispute is raised must be one in

whose employment, non employment, terms, of

employment, conditions of labour (as the case may

be) the parties to the dispute have a direct or

substantial interest. Whether such direct or

substantial interest has been established in a

particular case will depend on its facts and

circumstances. ”

16. “In Kyas Construction Company (Pvt ) Ltd. (1958

(2) LLJ 660), the Apex Court ruled that an industrial dispute

heed not be a dispute between the employer and his

workman and that the definition of the expression

"industrial dispute "is wide enough to cater a dispute

raised by the employer's workman with regard to non-

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4663

employment of others, who may not be employed as

workman at the relevant time. The Apex Court in Bombay

Union of Journalist [1961 (II) LLJ 436] has observed that in

each case in ascertaining whether an individual dispute

has acquired the character of an industrial dispute, the test

is whether at the date of reference, the dispute was taken

up as submitted by the union of the workmen of the

employer against whom, the dispute is raised by an

individual workman or' by an appreciable number of

workmen. In order, therefore, to convert an individual

dispute into an industrial dispute, it has to be established

that it has been taken up by the union of employees of the

establishment or by an appreciable number of the

employees of the establishment. As far as union of the

workmen of establishment itself is concerned, the problem

of espousal by them generally presents little difficulty, since

such workmen who are members of such unions generally

have a continuity of interest with an individual employee

who is one of their fellow workman. But difficulty arise

when the cause of a workman, in a particular establishment

is sponsored by a union which is not of the workmen of

that establishment but is one of which membership is open

to workmen of their establishment as well as in that industry.

In such a case a union which has only microscopic number

of the workmen as its member, cannot sponsor any dispute

arising between the workmen and the management. A

representative character of the union has to be gathered

from the strength of the actual number of co workers

sponsoring the dispute. The mere fact that a substantial

number of workmen of the establishment in which the

concerned workman was employee were. also members of

the union would not constitute sponsorship. It must be

shown that they were connected together and arrived at

an understanding by a resolution or by other means and

collectively submitted the dispute.

17. The expression "industrial disputes" has been

construed by the Apex Court to include individual disputes,

because of the scheme of the Act.' In Raghu Nath Gopal

Patvardhan [1957(1) LLJ 27] the Apex Court ruled as to

what dispute can be called as an industrial dispute. It was

laid thereon that (1) a dispute between the employer and a

single workman cannot be an industrial dispute, (2) it cannot

per-se be an industrial dispute but may become if it is taken

up by a trade union or a number of workmen. In Dharampal

Prem Chand [1965 (1) LLJ 668] it was commanded by the

Apex Court that a dispute raised by a single workman cannot

become an industrial dispute unless it is.supported either

by his union or in the absence of a union by substantial

number of workmen. Same law was laid in the case of Indian

Express Newspaper (Pvt.) Limited [1970 (1) LLJ 132].

However In Western lndia Match Company [1970 (II) LLJ

256], the Apex Court referred the precedent in Diakuchi

Tea Estate's case [1958 (1) LLJ 500] and ruled that a dispute

relating to "any person becomes a dispute where the person

in respect of whom it is raised is one in whose employment,

non employment, terms of employment or conditions of

labour, the parties, dispute for a direct or substantial

interest".

18. What a substantial or considerable number of

workmen would be in a given case, depend on particular

facts of the case. The fact that an "industrial dispute", is

supported by other workmen will have to be established

either in the form, of a resolution of the union of which

workman may be member or of the workmen themselves

who support the dispute or in any other manner. From the

mere fact that a general union, at whose instance an

"industrial dispute" concerning an individual workman is

referred for adjudication has on its roll a few of the workmen

of the establishment as its members, it cannot be inferred

that the individual dispute has been converted into an"

“industrial dispute". The Tribunal has therefore, to consider

the question as to how many of the fellow workman actually

espoused the cause of the concerned workman by

participating in the particular resolution of the Union. In

the absence of a such a determination by the Tribunal, it

cannot be said that the individual dispute acquired the

character of an industrial dispute and the Tribunal will not

acquire jurisdiction to adjudicate upon the dispute.

Nevertheless, in order to make a dispute an industrial

dispute, it is not necessary that there should always be a

resolution of substantial or appreciable number of workmen.

What is necessary is that there should be some express or

collective will of a substantial or an appreciable member of

the workmen treating the cause of the individual workman

as their own cause. Law to this effect was laid in P.

Somasundrameran [1970 (1)LLJ 558].

19. It is not necessay that the sponsoring union is a

registered trade union or a recognized trade union. Once it

is shown that a body of substantial number of workmen

either acting through a union or otherwise had sponsored

the workman’s cauae, it is sufficient to convert it into an

industrial dispute. In Pardeep Lamp Works [1970(1) LLJ507]

complaints relating to dispute of ten workmen were filed

before the Conciliation Officer by the indivdual workmen

themselves. But their case was subsequently taken up by

a new union formed by a large number of co-workmen, if

not a majority of them. Since this union was not registered

or recognized, the workman elected five representatives

to prosecute the Cases of ten dismissed workmen. Thus

Cases of the dismissed workmen were espoused by the

new union, yet unregistered and unrecognized. The Apex

Court held that the fact that these disputes were not taken

up by a registered or recognized union does not mean that

they were not “industrial dispute”.

20. It is not expedient that same union should remain

incharge of that dispute till its adjudication. The dispute

may be espoused by the workmen of an establishment,

through a particular union for making such a dispute an

“industrial dispute”, while the workman may be represented

before the Tribunal for the purpose of section 36 of the Act

4664

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

by a member of executive or office bearer of altogether

another union. The crux of the matter is that the dispute

should be a dispute between the employer and his workmen.

It is not necessary that the dispute must be espoused or

conducted only by a registered trade union. Even if trade

union ceases to be registered trade union during the

continuance of the adjudication proceedings that would

not affect the maintainability of the order of reference. Law

to this effect was laid by the High Court of Orissa in Gammon

India Limited [1974 (II) LLJ 34[. For ascertaining as to

whether an individual dispute has acquired character of an

individual dispute, the test is whether on the date of the

reference the dispute was taken up as supported by the

union of the workmen of the employer against whom the

dispute is raised by the individual workman or by an

appreciable number of the workman. In other words, the

validity of the reference of an industrial dispute must be

judged on the facts as they stood on the date of the

reference and not necessarily on the date when the cause

occurs. Reference can be made to a precedent in Western

India Match Co. Ltd. [1970 (II) LLJ 256].

21. With the above legal proposition in mind, now it

would be ascertained as to whether the dispute espoused

by the union is an industrial dispute. At the cost of

repetition, it is pointed out that the bank nowhere disputes

that the union has espoused the cause of claimant for

redressal. Consequently, it is apparent that the union

expressed its collective will and took up the cause of the

claimant as their own. The bank nowhere questions the

proposition that the union espoused the cause and applied

to the appropriate Government in the prescribed manner,

as provided by sub-section (2) of section 10 of the Act, for

taking steps for reference of the dispute to an industrial

adjudicator. An application was moved by the union in

consonance with provisions of rule 3 and 4 of the Industrial

Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. One may announce that

the President and Secretary of the Union signed the

application, after expression of collective will by members

of the union to take up cause of the claimant as their own.

22. The bank projects that there were 28 member of

the union, who constitute barely 0.8% of the total number

of workmen in the organization. It has nowhere been

projected as to how many workmen were there in Rishikesh

or Haridwar branch of the bank or in the region, under

consideration. The bank runs its Head Office, Zonal Office

and branches throughout the country. For espousing case

of a workman, union representing employees of a particular

region/branch may take up his cause. Even otherwise, it

was for the bank to establish, by way of cogent evidence

that the union has only microscopic strength of its members.

By simple assertion of facts in its written statement, the

bank would not be able to dislodge the proposition that

the union represents considerable number of employees in

the bank. Since the bank has not been able to dislodge the

claim of the Computer Terminal Operator to the effect that

his case was espoused by the union having substantial or

considerable number of its workmen as its member in the

establishment of the bank, findings cannot be recorded to

this effect that the dispute raised by the union had not

acquired status of an industrial dispute. Resultantly, it is

concluded that the dispute referred for adjudication is an

industrial dispute and the Trlbunal has rightly invoked its

jurisdiction for adjudication.

23. Now I would advert to the facts of the present

controversy. Employees in any concern are, in ordinary

course of business, liable to be transferred. No concern

can possibly run if it has no right to transfer its employees

from one branch to another. The transfer might cause some

inconvenience but all employees are bound to suffer

inconvenience unless there is some stipulation in their

condition of services to the effect that they will remain at a

particular branch or place of business. Thus, liability to be

transferred is a normal incidence of service in any concern

and it does not necessarily involve punishment. So the

employer has got a right in law to transfer an employee

from one branch to another or from one concern to another,

which is also under the same employer.

24. In effecting transfer of workmen from one branch

to another, the employer must act bonafide and in the

interest of its business. The existence of power to transfer

and its scope and exercise of it are entirely two different

questions. Colourable exercise by the employer of his power

to transfer a workman from one establishment at one place

to another at different place can always be a subject matter

of industrial dispute. In considering the question whether

transfer from one place to another had effected a change in

the conditions of service of a workman, following types of

cases must be considered, namely :—

(a)

Where there are standing orders or the conditions

of service have been reduced to writing; and

(i) those may either contain provisions to

deal with transfers, or

(ii) they may not.

(b)

Where there are no standing orders at all or any

other instrument in writing to deal with service

conditions.

25. In cases falling under (b) or (a) (ii), liability to be

transferred from one establishment to another at a different

place by the employer or at his instance is an incidence of

service, that is to say, an implied condition of service and

the workman concerned cannot successfully complain

unless he can show that the transfer was made by way of

punishment. In cases falling within (a) (i) above two broad

questions arise for consideration, namely - (i) whether the

rules or provisions dealing with the matter of transfer are

of the fullest amplitude, that is to say, whether they cover

the whole field of transfer, or (ii) whether they are not.

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4665

In the first case, those rules or provisions would be the

only governing rules or provisions on the subject. Whether

the rules regarding transfer are of the fullest amplitude or

not would depend upon consideration of the standing

orders or contract of service. In the second type of cases,

it must be seen as to what extent the special provisions or

rules in the standing orders have effected or curtailed the

general power of transfer of the employer which is implied

in every contract of service.

26. Powers of the employer to transfer an employee

from one place to another necessarily includes two things,

namely—

(i)

It can only be taken away or curtailed or regulated

in express terms, and

(ii)

that the power is only in the employer which means

that only the employer or a person either expressly

authorized by him or who can be said to have that

authority impliedly, can exercise that power.

27. As detailed below, Shastry Award and Settlement

dated 02-06-2005, place restrictions on the powers of the

Bank to effect rotational transfers of its employees. Transfer

of an employee whith is justified by exigencies of service

and also in accordance with the standing orders cannot be

said to be creating hardship to the employee. In such

transfer, question of hardship cannot be construed to treat

the transfer unfair. In Shastry Award, the policy of transfer

of the staff was penned down in Para 535. Relying on Sen

Award, directives were given, which are reproduced as

follows:

(i)

Every registered Bank employees' union, from time

to time, shall furnish the Bank with the names of

the President, Vice President and the Secretaries

of the Union;

(ii)

Except in very special cases, whenever the

transfer of any of the above mentioned office

bearers is contemplated, at least five clear working

days' notice should be put up on the notice board

of the Bank of such contemplated action;

(iii)

Any representation, written or oral, made by the

union shall be considered by the Bank;

(iv)

If any order of transfer is ultimately made, a record

shall be made by the Bank of such representation

and the Bank’s reasons for regarding them as

inadequate; and

(v)

The decision shall be communicated to the union

as well as to the employee concerned.

28.Besides the above, 7th Bipartite Settlement was

signed on 27-03-2000 wherein it was provided that the bank

may identify pockets of surplus/deficit areas of operation

in different centres. Imbalances of deployment of staff

may be corrected, and for that purpose, policy may be

resolved by way of bank level agreements. 8th Bipartite

Settlement was signed on 02-06-2005 wherein detailed policy

of deployment was agreed upon between the union and

the IBA. Clause 32 of the said settlement details that in

continuation of clause 32 of 7th Bipartite Settlement dated

27-03-2000, it is agreed between the parties that deployment

of non-subordinate staff in banks shall be in accordance to

the terms and conditions set forth in Schedule VI of the

settlement. Schedule VI appended to the settlement brings

in certain benefits/concessions in favour of the workmen

staff. Those benefits/concessions are detailed herein below:

‘‘(i)

A workman in the non-subordinate cadre is liable

to be deployed, anywhere within a ‘District’,

irrespective of the distance involved.

(ii)

In cases necessitating deployment outside the

District, the workman concerned may be deployed

to any branch/office of the bank situated outside

the District up to a distance not exceeding 100

km. from his present place of posting.

(iii)

Bank may Identify, based on length of stay at the

centre/branch/office, the number of workmen

employees, to be redeployed from each centre/

branch / office to meet its requirements.

(iv)

The period of deployment shall be 2 years in a

difficult centre decided by the bank in accordance

with the Government guidelines and 3 years in

other centers.

(v)

Repatriation to the original centre shall be after

serving in the deployed centre for period as in

(iv) above. In case it is not administratively

possible for the bank to repatriate the employee

to his original centre after the above period, the

employee may be required to give 3 centers of his

choice so that he can be transferred to anyone of

the 3 centers opted by him.

(vi)

Female employees above the age of 55 and male

employees above the age of 56 shall be exempt

from redeployment. However, if the required and

eligible number of employees is not available to

be deployed in terms of the Settlement, the age

norms as above may be suitably relaxed up to the

age of 58 years so as to ensure that the required

and eligible numbers of employees are deployed

to the identified centers.

(vii)

Employees having mentally retarded/spastic

children, certified as such by the attending Doctor,

may be deployed only at centers where

specialised treatment for such children and special

facilities of their schooling are available.

(viii)

Employees affected by serious ailments requiring

specialised treatment, as certified by the attending

Doctor, will be deployed only at centers where

4666

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

medical facilities for treatment of such ailments

are available.

(ix)

Redeployment of physically handicapped/

challenged employees shall be in accordance with

the extant Government guidelines.

(x)

A workman in the non-subordinate cadre so long

as he serves in the deployed centre shall draw a

lump sum amount of Rs. 400 p.m. (not ranking for

any other benefit) besides protection of

emoluments drawn at the original centre. These

shall cease on the employee's repatriation to the

original centre.

(xi)

The above lump sum amount is not payable in

case of transfers made at the request of the

employee.

(xii)

In North-Eastern States, banks may decide on the

level and extent of deployment having regard to

their requirements within the above norms.

(xiii)

The above provisions on deployment are without

prejudice to the provisions of paragraphs 535 and

536 of the Sastry Award relating to transfer of

workmen.

(xiv)

The above provisions on deployment shall be

the minimum applicable to all the banks which are

parties to this Settlement. Parties agree that any

existing bank-level settlement on transfer or

deployment whose provisions are restrictive and

not up to the minimum provisions on deployment

as mentioned above will be modified/terminated

as per procedure under the Industrial Disputes

Act so as to give effect to the above-mentioned

provisions on deployment.

(xv)

Any bank which is a party to this Settlement and

having bank-level Settlement on transfer or

deployment may, however, modify and improve

upon the above provisions to suit the needs of

the bank ensuring, however, that the norms

relating to the geographical minimum area of

deployment, period of stay at the deployed centre,

conditions for repatriation as mentioned

hereinabove are not relaxed or diluted in any

manner.

(xvi)

In banks which are parties to this Settlement where

bank level settlements/policies on transfer or

deployment of workmen exist which provide for

transferability of employees over a larger

geographical area, such bank level settlements

on transfer or deployment shall remain operative”.

29. The bank raised an issue that the 8th Bipartite

settlement was signed on 02-06-1995 while claimant was

transferred to Haridwar branch in July 2004. According to

the bank, terms of 8th Bipartite Settlement nowhere comes

for the benefit of the claimant. Alas! this arguments is not

available to the bank. Clause 39 of the 8th Bipartite

Settlement highlights that the settlement shall be binding

on the parties for five years from 01-11-2002. Clause 38 of

the said settlement speaks of implementation of various

benefits, agreed to be granted in favour of the workmen

staff from different dates as detailed in that clause. As

noted, benefits relating to scale of pay, 6th stagnation

increment, slab rate, dearness allowance, special pay and

consolidated wages of part time employees working less

than 6 hours per week were to be implemented from

01-11-2002. Dearness allowance on single slab rate was to

be implemented from 01-02-2005. Professional qualification

pay, house rent allowance, city compensatory allowance,

provident fund, gratuity, recovery of house rent, fixed

personal pay, hill and fuel allowance, transport allowance

and annual medical aid, special area allowance, project area

allowance, split duty allowance and cycle allowance were

to be implemented from 01-11-2002. Provisions relating to

pension were to be implemented from 01.05.2005. Clauses

relating to hospital expenses, halting allowance,

compensation on loss on transfer, expenses on road

transfer, leave fare concession and overtime allowance were

to be implemented from the date of settlement i.e.

02-06-2005. Washing allowance provisions were to be

implemented from 1st August, 2004. All other items agreed,

but not covered, were to be implemented from the date of

settlement, i.e. 02-06-2005.

30. Deployment allowance as provided in Schedule

VI of the settlement was to be implemented from the date of

settlement, i.e. 02.06.2005. This proposition led the bank to

a confusion. As clause 39 spells, settlement is binding on

the parties for five years from 01.11.2002. Thus this

settlement became operative from 1st November, 2002.

When claimant was transferred to Haridwar branch of the

bank in July 2004, this settlement was deemed to be

operative, on account of retrospective operation accorded

to it by clause 39, as referred above. Implementation clause

simply points out as to from which date a particular benefit

would be implemented. Thus, it is apparent that in July

2004 the settlement was in operation and deployment

allowance of Rs. 400.00 per month was to be implemented

from 02-06-2005. It would mean that all the workmen staff

deployed to other centres after 01-11-2002 would get

deployment allowance with effect from 02-06-2005.

Consequently, it is crystal clear that the case of the claimant

is covered in all four corners of provisions of Schedule VI

of the 8th Bipartite Settlement. Claimant was entitled to get

deployment allowance in lump sum @ Rs. 400.00 per month

from 02-06-2005 till 31-05-2008, the period for which he

remained deployed at Haridwar branch of the bank. The

issue is, accordingly, answered in favour of the claimant

and against the bank.

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4667

Issue No. 2.

31. Since the claimant has been retransferred to

Rishikesh branch of the bank, where he joined on

01.09.2008, there is no occasion for the tribunal to

adjudicate as to whether the claimant is entitled for retransfer

to that branch. Consequently, the issue of re transfer

becomes infructuous. On the other hand, no evidence has

been brought forward by the claimant to the effect as to

when he reached the age of 58 years and entitled for re-

transfer to Rishikesh branch. The issue relating to

entitlement of lumpsum of Rs.400.00 as deployment

allowance has already been answered In favour of the

claimant, as referred above. Issues, raised in the reference

order are answered accordingly.

Relief

32. Since the claimant has already been transferred

back to Rishikesh branch of the bank, there is no occasion

for the Tribunal to adjudicate as to whether denial by the

bank to transfer the claimant to Rishikesh branch is legal

and justified. As detailed above, claimants entitled to

deployment allowance in terms of Schedule VI of the 8th

Bipartite Settlement from 02-06-2005 to31-08-2008 @

Rs.400.00 per month, which allowance comes to

Rs.15586.66.The bank shall make payment of the said

deployment allowance to the claimant within a period of 30

days from the date the award becomes operative. An award

is, accordingly, passed. It be sent to the appropriate

Government for Publication.

Dated : 27-6-2013

Dr. R.K. YADAV, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 10 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1652-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj dsujk cSad ds

çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/

esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@

Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k lhth vkbZVh@

,ylh@vkj@14@98) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks

15&6&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y&12012@248@1997&vkbZ vkj (ch&II)º

lqefr ldykuh] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 10th July, 2013

S.O. 1652.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Diputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT/

LC/R/14/98) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/

Labour Court, Jabalpur now as shown in the Annexure, in

the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation

to the management of Canara Bank and their workman

which was received by the Central Government on 15-6-

2013.

[No. L-12012/248/1997-IR(B-II)]

SUMATI SAKLANI, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR-COURT,

JABALPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/R/14/98

PRESIDING OFFICER: SHRI R.B.PATLE

Shri Yogendra Rawat,

S/o Shri D.P.Rawat,

House No. 16, CTO Colony,

Bairagarh, Bhopal ......Workman

Versus

The Branch Manager,

Canara Bank,

204, Karamchand Chowk,

Post Box No. 221,

Jabalpur ........Management

AWARD

Passed on this 12th day of March, 2013

1. As per letter dated 6-8-1998 by the Government of

India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is

received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under

Section -10 of I.D.Act 1947 as per Notification No. L-l2012/

248/9-IR(B-II). The dispute under reference relates to:

“Whether the action of the management of Canara

Bank in terminating the services of Shri Yogendra

Rawat w. e. f. 25-11-87 is legal and justified? lf not,

to what relief the said workman is entitled?”

2. After receipt or the reference, notices were issued

to the parties. 1st party/workman filed his statement of

claim at Page 3/l to 3/6 of record. It is case of 1st party that

he reccived education upto 8th standard. He holds

qualification for post or peon/messenger. He had submitted

application for appointment in sub-staff cadre under Award

Staff. He was called for interview and thereafter was

appointed in the post of peon/messenger from 29-1-86. Ist

part /workman was posted at Canara Bank, Karamchand

Chowk Branch, Jabalpur. He was continued in service till

25-11 -87. He was paid wages for said period and its record

is available with IInd party/management. His services were

terminated without reasons in violation of Section 25-F of

I. D. Act, 1947.

3. 1st party/workman further submits that there was

regular vacancies of post of peon with IInd party/

management. Despite of regular vacancy, his services

were utilized as temporary employee. He was continuously

working in the Bank till 25-11-87 for 504 days without any

break. That IInd party/management has also violated

Section 25-F of I.D. Act. No letter of appointment or

termination was issued. He had completed 240 days

working preceding the date of his termination. That as per

4668

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Shastry Award, the employees completing 90 days service

in Bank are considered for regular appointment. The IInd

party/ management has victimized by not giving benefit

of said award. lst party/workman has illegally terminated

his srvice that his parents are victim of Bhopal Gas

Tragedy. His parents are sick. He prays for his

reinstatement with consequential benefits.

4. IInd party/management filed Written Statement at

page 5/1 to 5/7 of the record. The claim of lst party workman

is denied. It is contended by IInd party that procedure for

recruitment was not followed, his name was not sponsored

through Employment Exchange. He was engaged at

Jabalpur City Branch from 1986 to 87. He was never

appointed by the bank, no appointment letter was issued.

That 1st party/workman himself stopped coming to

Branch of his own violation. Preliminary objection is

submitted that the reference of dispute is not tenable.

Referring ratio held in several cases. IInd party/

management submitted that dispute is not tenable. Neither

Ist party/workman is not entitled to his reinstatement as

he has worked for short term period.

5. Ist party/workman submitted rejoinder at page

6/1 to 6/5 denying the material contentions in Written

statement filed by IInd party management. It is submitted

that the Written Statement is filed to mislead the Court to

establish that the workman was not an employee of the

bank in view of non-issuance of the appointment letter.

Termination of his service is covered as retrenchment

under Section 2(oo) of the I.D. Act. Ist party/workman

also referred ratio held in several cases and contended

that he is entitled to reinstatement with back wages.

6. Considering pleadings on record, the points

which arise for my consideration and determination are as

under. My findings are recorded against each of them for

the reasons as below:-

(i)

whether the action of the

In Negative

management of Canara Bank

in terminating the services of

Shri Yogendra Rawat w.e.f.

25-11-87 is legal and justified?

(ii) If not, what relief the

Ist party is

workman is entitled to?"

entitled to one

month's notice

pay and

retrenchment

compensation as

per final ordcr.

REASONS

7. The Ist party/workman is challenging his

termination from service for violation of Section 25-F, H of

I.D. Act claiming that he has continuously worked for 240

days prior to termination of his service. In the preceding

year, he had worked for 205 days as such he acquire

status of regular employee of the Bank. His services were

orally terminated without assigning any reason. No notice

was given. Ist party/workman did not submit his evidence.

On 6-11-2011, the workman was proceed exparte.

Management has filed affidavit of his witness Shri Sanjeev

Kumar. The witness of the management has stated that

procedure for recruitment of Ist party/workman was not

followed. Ist party/workman was trying to get back door

entry to get permanent appointment. That Ist party was

engaged temporarily at Jabalpur City Branch from 1986 to

87 on day to day basis. They have not undergone

recruitment process. The dispute is referred after 10 years.

He submitted that the workman had not completed 240

days working continuously preceding the year of his

termination . IInd party/management has also not given

the breakup of working period of Ist party/workman. Ist

party/workman has given detail of his working of total

504 days. The record relating to employment is presumed

to be in the custody of the management but the

management has not produced the record. That he has

worked 240 days before his date of termination, the total

working period as per his pleadings comes 29-1-86 to

25-11-87 for more than 22 months deserves to be accepted.

The pleadings and evidence of IInd party are silent about

one months termination notice as per Section 25-F of I.D.

Act or payment of retrenchment compensation. The

counsel for IInd party remained absent. No arguments are

advanced. In my considered view, Ist party/workman was

working for about 22 months. Retrenchment compensation

for 28 days and one months notice pay needs to be paid

to the Ist party/workman. For non-compliance of Section

25-F of the I.D. Act, the termination of Ist party/workman

is not just and legal. Accordingly I record my finding in

Point No. I in Negative.

8. Point No. 2—As per my finding in Point No.1,

termination of Ist party/workman is not legal for violation

of Section 25-F. However the Ist party had not produced

any evidence that he was appointed after following

recruitment procedure. Therefore Ist party/workman is not

entitled to reinstatement rather he will be entitled to notice

pay for one month and retrenchment compensation of 28

days wages. Accordingly for above reasons, I record my

finding in Point No. 2.

9. In the result, Award is passed as under :—

(1) Termination of services of Ist party/workman

Yogendra Rawat by Canara Bank on 25-11-1987 is

not legal.

(2) IInd party/management is directed to pay one

month’s salary/wages in lieu of notice and 28 days

wages towards retrenchment compensation @ last

wages paid to him. Amount as per this order be

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4669

paid within 30 days. In case of default, IInd party/

management shall pay 9% interest on above

amount from the date of order till its payment.

R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 11 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1653-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj iatkc us'kuy

cSad ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k

lhthvkbZ@,ylh@vkj@10@97) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh;

ljdkj dks 11&7&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y&12012@313@95&vkbZ vkj (ch&II)º

lqefr ldykuh] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 11th July, 2013

S.O. 1153.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Diputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGIT/

LC/R/10/97) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/

Labour Court, Jabalpur now as shown in the Annexure, in

the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation

to the management of Punjab National Bank and their

workman which was received by the Central Government

on 11-7-2013.

[ No. L-12012/313/95-IR(B-II)]

SUMATI SAKLANI, Section Officer.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM-LABOUR COURT,

JABALPUR

No. CGIT/LC/R/10/97

Presiding Officer : SHRI R.B.PATLE

The Assistant General Secretary, .

Punjab National Bank Employees Association,

Through Punjab National Bank.,

Sadar Bazar, Jabapur .....Workman/Union

Versus

Regional Manager,

Punjab National Bank.,

R.O. 124, Napier Town,

Jabalpur ....Management

AWARD

Passed on this 25th day of June, 2013

1. As per letter dated 3-1-97 by the Government of

India, Ministry of labour, New Delhi, the reference is

received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under

Section -10 of I.D. Act, 1947 as per Notification No.

L-12012/313/95-IR(B-II). The dispute under reference

relates to:

‘‘Whether the action of the management of Punjab

National Bank, J abalpur (MP) in reducing the basic

pay and consequently recovering amount w.e.f.

13-3-92 from the salary of Shri Makar Singh, Armed

Guard, Damoh Branch (MP) is legal and justified? If

not, to what relief the workman is entitled for?”

2. Ist party Union is challenging reduction in basic

pay and recovery from his salary w.e.f. 13-3-92 in the

dispute under reference. Even after issuing notices, the

Union has not participated in the proceeding, no statement

of claim is filed. Ist party is proceeded exparte on 13-7- 09.

3. Ilnd party management also not filed Written

Statement. From conduct of the Ist party, it is clear that the

parties are not pursuing or participating in the dispute.

4. In the result, award is passed as under:-

" Reference is disposed off as No Dispute Award."

R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 11 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1654-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj dsujk cSad ds

çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/

esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/&dj.k@Je U;k;ky;&2] eqEcbZ ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k lh

thvkbZ Vh@2@11vkWiQ 2008) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh;

ljdkj dks 11&7&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y&12012@106@2007&vkbZ vkj (ch&II)º

lqefr ldykuh] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 11th July, 2013

S.O. 1654.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Diputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT-

2/11 of 2008) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/

Labour Court-2, Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure,

in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation

to the management of Canara Bank and their workman,

which was received by the Central Government on

11-7-2013.

[ No. L-12012/106/2007-IR(B-II)]

SUMATI SAKLANI, Section Officer

4670

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 2, MUMBAI

PRESENT : K.B.KATAKE, Presiding Officer

REFERENCE NO.CGIT -2/11 of 2008

EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE

MANAGEMENT OF

CANARA BANK

The Deputy General Manager,

Canara Bank

Disciplinary Authority, Disciplinary Action Cell

13th floor, Maker Tower 'E'

Cuffe Parade

Mumbai-400005.

AND

THEIR WORKMAN

Shri Chandrakant G. Kawle

Shivshankar Nagar

Salt Pan Road

Near Sonali Classes

Wadala

Mumbai-400 052.

APPEARANCES :

For the Employer

:

Mr. S.V. Alva, Advocate

For the Workman

:

Mr. J.H. Sawant, Advocate

Mumbai, dated the 22nd May, 2013

AWARD PART-I

1. The Government of India, Ministry of Labour &

Employment by its Order No. L-12012/106/2007 -IR (B-II)

dated 28-01-2008 in exercise of the powers conferred by

clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of

Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 have referred

the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for

adjudication:

"Whether the action of the management of Canara

Bank in imposing the punishment of Dismissal

without Notice on Shri Chandrakant G. Kawle, sub-

staff vide Order dated 29-01-2003 is legal, proper

and proportionate to the gravity of misconduct

allegedly committed by Shri Chandrakant G. Kawle?

If not, to what relief Shri Chandrakant G. Kawle is

entitled to and from which date and what other orders

are necessary in the matter?"

2. After receipt of the reference notices were issued

to both the parties. In response to the notice the second

party workman filed his statement of claim at Ex-3.

According to him he was permanent employee of the first

party Bank working as a sub staff. On 27-01-2001 an amount

of Rs. 5,50,000 was found missing from the Strong Room

of the Bank. The Bank lodged a Police complaint. The

statement of the second party in the nature of confession

was recorded by the Police under threat. A criminal case

was filed in the Court of Additional Chief Metropolitan

Magistrate Mumbai against the second party. In that case

the second party workman was acquitted by order dated

03-03-2007. In the meantime the first party had initiated

disciplinary proceedings against the second party on the

identical facts and charges as in the criminal case. During

the inquiry the Inquiry Officer did not follow the principles

of natural justice and findings recorded in the inquiry

proceedings were perverse. It was unlawful on the part of

the first party to initiate the disciplinary proceedings on

the same subject matter of the criminal case. There was no

legal evidence against the second party. The second party

had admitted the mistake as he was promised that no

disciplinary action would be taken. He was dismissed from

service on the basis of perverse findings of the disciplinary

authority. The said order of dismissal is illegal and

unjustified. The second party therefore prays that the said

order of dismissal without notice be set aside and the

second party workman be reinstated with full back-wages

and consequential benefits.

3. The first party management has resisted the

statement of claim vide its written statement at Ex-7.

According to them the reference is misconceived and not

maintainable. It is barred by limitation on the ground of

delay and laches. On 25-01-2001 second party was working

in Cash Department. He accompanied Shri J.M. Kamath to

the Strong Room who was asked to locate the cash slip

bundle. Mr. Kamath had collected second set of keys from

Shri B.T.Tapiwala, Officer. Mr. Kamath could not locate

the cash slip bundle and he left the strong room by handing

over second set of keys to the second party. Second party

alone was in the strong room for about 15 to 20 minutes

along with first set of keys which he had unauthorisedly

procured. At the end of the day cash to the extent of

Rs.6,00,000 was found short and notes of 500 and 100

denominations were found missing from the double lock

strong room. On 27-01-2001 at about 10.00 a.m. the Armed

Guard while entering the branch saw a plastic bag hanging

on the handle bar of the wooden door fixed in between the

main grill gate and the glass door at the entrance. An

amount of Rs.5,50,000 was found inside the said bag.

Bank lodged a police complaint. On interrogation by Police

second party confessed to have stolen the cash to the

extent of Rs.6,00,000 and also confessed to having kept

the plastic bag containing amount of Rs.5,50,000. The

Police also recovered an amount of Rs.45,000 from the

house of the second party.

4. The second party was put under suspension

pending disciplinary action for the misconduct. He was

paid subsistence allowance @ 1/3rd of the salary and

emolument for. the first three months of his suspension

and thereafter @ one half of his salary. The second party

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4671

was served with charge sheet dt. 22-09-2001. An

independent I O Mr. V.B. Moharir, Manager, Vigilance,

was appointed as Inquiry Officer. He conducted the inquiry

in eight sittings. The second party and the defence

representative of his choice Shri N.G.Nikam attended the

inquiry proceedings. Copies of full set of documents along

with list of documents and witnesses were given to the

second party along with charge-sheet well in advance. In

all 13 witnesses were examined in presence of second party

and his defence representative and they were allowed to

be cross examined by the second party. Opportunity was

also given to the second party to examine himself or any

other witness on his behalf. However neither he examined

himself or examined any other witness or produced any

document. Full and fair opportunity was given to the

second party to defence himself in the inquiry proceeding.

The Inquiry Officer submitted his report. Copy thereof

was sent to the second party for his Say. The second

party submitted his representation on 25-11-2002. The

disciplinary authority carefully evaluated the entire

proceedings of the inquiry, the oral and documentary

evidence and entire record and the submissions of the

second party and passed the order of dismissal. The

criminal proceeding pending before Additional Chief

Metropolitan Magistrate Court has no concern and it has

no effect on the findings of the inquiry officer. According

to the first party the second party was working in a Bank

who is custodian of public money and the employees

working in the Bank requires utmost honesty and integrity

as they are dealing with public money. The second party

was found guilty of a serious misconduct of theft.

Therefore he is not entitled to any leniency. The

punishment is thus proportionate to the misconduct.

Therefore first party prays that the reference deserves to

be dismissed with cost.

5. The second party workman filed his rejoinder at

Ex-8. He explained that, delay in raising the dispute was

caused as he raised the dispute after he was acquitted by

the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate. In spite of

that the first party refused to reinstate him. He also

reiterated that inquiry was not fair and proper and there

was violation of principles of natural justice etc.

6. Following are the preliminary issues for my

determination. record my findings thereon for the reasons

to follow:

Sr.

Issues

Findings

No.

1.

Whether the inquiry of workman Shri

Yes

Chandrakant G. Kawale held by the

first party management is fair and

proper?

2.

Whether the findings of the Inquiry

No.

Officer are perverse?

REASONS

Issue No.1 :—

7. In the case at hand according to the first party

after the preliminary inquiry, charge-sheet was served on

the second party workman for the alleged misconduct.

The second party has admitted the fact in his cross-

examination that he received the charge-sheet dated

22-09-2001. Copy thereof is on record at Ex-17. It is

contended in the written statement as well as in the affidavit

of IO at Ex-20 that copies of all the documents were given

to the second party. The said suggestion was put in the

cross examination of the second party workman at Ex-13.

He has not denied that copies of documents and list of

witnesses were supplied to him along with the charge

sheet. He vaguely replied that he does not understand

whether copies of documents and list of witnesses were

supplied to him. The fact is not disputed that Mr. Nikam

was defence representative of the second party and he

cross examined all the witnesses. The second party has

also admitted in his cross that inquiry papers pages 5 to

41 each page bears his signature. The Inquiry Officer has

stated in his affidavit at Ex-20 that defence representative

Mr. Nikam is a senior, experienced person well versed in

English and Marathi. He has also contended in his affidavit

that after examination of management witnesses he

permitted defence representative to produce his witnesses

and the defence representative told that he has no witness

and no document to submit. Second party also did not

examine himself but submitted a written brief. A specific

suggestion was put to the second party in his cross

examination at Ex-13. He has not denied that inquiry Officer

had given him opportunity to put his defence and examine

his witnesses. He has replied the question in the same

fashion that he does not understand the same. However

he admitted his signature on inquiry proceeding on that

date. It is at Ex-18.

8. It is the case of the first party that the copy of the

inquiry report was sent to the second party and his

submission was sought for. A specific suggestion to that

effect was given in the cross-examination of second party

at Ex-13 that he and his defence representative were

present before the Bank for personal hearing. He replied

that he does not remember it. However in the next sentence

he has admitted that after personal hearing he had,

preferred appeal to the management. He has also admitted

in his cross that the IO had sent him the copy of findings

of inquiry. In short, the charge sheet was served on the

second party. The second party was represented by a

defence representative Mr. Nikam. All the management

witnesses were examined in presence of the second party

workman and his defence representative. Fair and proper

opportunity was given to the defence representative to

cross examine them. Opportunity was also given to the

second party to examine himself and his witnesses.

4672

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

However second party did not examine himself or examine

any witnesses or produce any document. The report and

findings of IO were sent to the second party and after

giving him personal hearing the disciplinary authority

passed the order of dismissal.

9. In the circumstances Ld. Adv. for the first party

submitted that the lO has followed the procedure

prescribed for conducting the inquiry and fair and sufficient

opportunity was given to the second party workman. In

support of his argument the Ld. Adv. for first party resorted

to Apex Court ruling in Sur Enamel and Stamping Works

Ltd. V/s. Their Workmen1963 II LLJ 367 wherein the Hon'ble

Apex Court laid down the following conditions for fair

and proper disciplinary inquiry.

They are:

(1)

The employee proceeded against has been

informed clearly of the charges levelled against

him.

(2)

The witnesses are examined-ordinarily in the

presence of the employee in respect of the

charges.

(3)

The employee is given a fair opportunity to

cross examine witnesses.

(4)

He is given a fair opportunity to examine

witnesses including himself in his defence if he

so wishes on any relevant matter and

(5)

The inquiry officer records his findings with

reasons for the same in his report.

10. In the case at hand as per the guidelines of

Hon'ble Apex Court all the points referred hereinabove

were complied while conducting the inquiry. Furthermore

though the second party has contended in his statement

of claim and affidavit that there was violation of principles

of natural justice, it is not pointed out how there was

violation of principles of natural justice. On the other hand

after going through the inquiry proceeding and the

evidence on record, it is revealed that fair and proper

opportunity was given to the workman as contemplated

by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the above referred ruling.

Thus on this ground, fairness of inquiry cannot be

challenged.

11. The main objection raised on behalf of the second

party is that, when criminal case was pending before

Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Inquiry Officer

ought to have stayed the inquiry till decision of the criminal

case. It was further submitted on behalf of the second

party that, as workman is acquitted in the criminal case, he

deserves to be reinstated. In this respect I would like to

point out that, the law on the point is well settled. In

criminal cases charges are required to be proved beyond

reasonable doubt to hold the accused guilty. Whereas in

the departmental inquiry standard of proof is all together

different, mere preponderance of probability suffices the

purpose. Furthermore though in criminal case the Court

has acquitted the workman, there is no bar to proceed

with the departmental inquiry and Inquiry Officer can

record findings contrary thereto as criminal case and

departmental proceeding are based on different standard

of proof.

12. In this respect Apex Court ruling can be resorted

to in South Bengal State Transport Corporation V/s. Sapan

Kumar Mitra & Ors. 2006 I LLJ 1087 wherein on the point

Hon'ble Court observed that;

‘‘That being the position, an order of removal from

service emanating from a departmental proceeding

can very well be passed even after acquittal of the

delinquent employee in a criminal case. ”

Same view is reiterated by the Apex Court in Suresh

Pathrela V/s. Oriental Bank of Commerce 2007 2 SCT 715

wherein Apex Court

observed that;

‘‘It is well settled principle of law that the yardstick

and standard of proof in criminal case is different

from the disciplinary proceeding. While the standard

of proof in a criminal case is a proof beyond all

reasonable doubt, the proof in departmental

proceeding is preponderance of probability.”

13. In the circumstances, the Hon'ble Court in that

case held that, acquittal in criminal case would be no bar

for conducting a disciplinary proceeding against

delinquent officer. Even after acquittal the delinquent

workman can be removed from service if found guilty in

disciplinary proceeding. In this backdrop I hold that

criminal proceeding or even acquittal therein does not affect

the punishment awarded in the departmental inquiry. In

the circumstances I come to the conclusion that the inquiry

is fair and proper. Accordingly I decide this issue no.1 in

the affirmative.

Issue No.2:—

14. In respect of findings of the Inquiry Officer it is

contended in the statement of claim that they are perverse.

In this respect also it is not specifically pleaded how they

are perverse. On the other hand it was rightly pointed out

on behalf of the first party that, findings of the Inquiry

Officer are based on the evidence on record. There was

evidence of 13 witnesses and few documents before the

Inquiry Officer. Furthermore it has come on record that an

amount of Rs.6,00,000 was missing from the strong room.

It has come on record that the workman was in the strong

room for about 15 - 20 minutes and Mr. Kamath had handed

over second key to him.The workman had Aunauthorisedly

obtained the first key of the strong room. It has also come

on record that the workman has confessed that he has

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4673

taken away the amount and an amount of Rs.5,50,000 was

kept by him in a plastic bag at the door of the Bank. An

amount of Rs.45,000 was also recovered from his

residence. The findings of the Inquiry Officer are based

on the evidence of the witnesses examined by the

management. Though they were thoroughly cross-

examined by the defence representative nothing adverse

was revealed from their cross-examination. In the

circumstances the findings of the Inquiry Officer which

are based on the evidence on record and consistent thereto

thus the same cannot be called perverse. In this respect I

would also like to point out that, the Tribunal is not sitting

as an appellate court to scrutinize the findings which are

prima facie based on the evidence on record. On the point

Apex Court ruling can be resorted to in US State Road

Transport Corporation & Ors V/s. Musais Ram & Ors.

1999 (83) FLR 226 (SC) wherein on the point Hon'ble Court

observed that;

‘‘The Court does not sit in appeal over the findings

of the IO. If the findings are based on uncontroverted

material placed before the IO, it cannot be said that

these findings are perverse.”

15. In short the findings of the Inquiry Officer are

based on evidence before him. They are not contrary to

the evidence on record and cannot be called perverse.

Thus I hold that the findings of the IO are not perverse.

Accordingly I decide this issue no. 2 in the negative and

proceed to pass the following order:

ORDER

(i) The inquiry is held fair and proper.

(ii) Findings of the Inquiry Officer are not perverse.

(iii) The parties are directed to argue/lead evidence

on the point of quantum of punishment.

Date: 22-05-2013

K. B. KATAKE , Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 11 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1655-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ

MCY;w lh ,y ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa

ds chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV (la[;k

53@2007) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 11&07&2013

dks izkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y& 22012@303@2006&vkbZ vkj(lh,e&IIº

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 11th July, 2013

S.O. 1655.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 53/2007)

of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Jablpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial

dispute between the management of WCL, and their

workmen, received by the Central Government on

11-07-2013.

[ No. L-22012/303/2006-IR(CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

JABLPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/R/53/07

SHRI R. B. PATLE , Presiding Officer

The General Secretary,

SKMS (AITUC),

CRO Camp, Iklehra,

Distt Chhindwara (MP)

....Workman/Union

Versus

The Chief General Manager,

WCL, Pench Area,

PO Parasia,

Distt. Chhindwara

. . . Management

AWARD

Passed on this 20th day of June, 2013

1. As per letter dated 5-7-2007 by the Government

of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is

received. The reference is made to this Tnbunal under

Section-10 of ID. Act, 1947 as per Notification. No.

L-22012/303/2006-IR(CM-II). The dispute under reference

relates to :

“Whether the action of the management of WCL

in dismissing Shri Prabhu Dayal from services

w.e.f. 22-5-06 is legal and justified? If not, to what

relief is the workman entitled?”

2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to

the parties. However 1st party workman filed to appear the

file Statement of claim. 1st party workman is proceeded

exparte on 30-7-2011. The management submitted Written

Statement the case as submitted by management of IInd

party is that 1st party workman was working as PBX

Operator at Rawanwara Khas Colliery of ECL, Pench Area.

He was habitual absentee, his attendance was poor, warning

letters were issued to him, he did not show improvement in

4674

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

attendance. The workman was unauthorisely absent from

18-5-02 without intimation, permission or sanctioned leave.

The charge sheet was issued to him on 30-10-2002, no

reply was received. Vide order dated 30-3-05, the

Departmental enquiry was ordered against him. That after

issuing notice as no response was received, said witness

Mr. Shakir Ahmed Sr. Under Manager'was appointed as

Enquiry Officer, P.M. Lokhande, Under Manager was

appointed as Management Representative. That the

enquiry was conducted following principles of natural

justice. Opportunity for defence was given to the workman.

The delinquent employee did not appear after notice. The

enquiry was proceeded exparte as he remained absent. The

evidence of management's witness was recorded after

receiving Enquiry Report. That charges were proved, notice

was issued to delinquent employee. Any reply was not

received to the notice. Workman was dismissed for proved

misconduct.

3. Considering pleadings on record, the points which

arise for my consideration and determination are as under.

My findings are recorded against each of them for the

reasons as below :—

(i)

Whether the action of the

management of M/s WCL

In Affirmative

in dismissing Shri Prabhu

Dayal from services w.e.f.

22-5-06 is legal?

(ii) If so, to what relief the

Relief prayed

workman is entitled to?”

by workman are

rejected.

REASONS

4. As stated above, reference is made for adjudication

for legality of dismissal or the services of workman from

22-5-06. However the workman has failed to appear after

notice. He proceeded exparte. He has not adduced any

evidence. The management filed affidavit of its witness

Shri Y. Seshidhar. the witness has stated most of the facts

pleaded in Written Statement filed by management of IInd

party. That services of 1st party workman was dismissed

for is unauthorized. absence. DE was conducted. Workman

failed to participate in enquiry. The evidence of witqess of

management remained unchallenged. Workman failed to

appear in the proceeding therefore 1 find no reason to

disbelieve evidence of. management’s witness. The action

of the management therefore cannot be said illegal. For

above reasons, I record my finding in Affirmative.

In the result, I pass the following award:—

(1) The action of the management of WCL in

dismissing Shri Prabhu Dayal from services w.e.f.

22-5-06 is legal.

(2) Relief prayed by workman is rejected.

R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 11 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1656-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ

MCY;w lh ,y ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa

ds chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k

4@2008) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 11&07&2013

dks izkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y& 22012@306@2007&vkbZ vkj(lh,e&IIº

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 11th July, 2013

S.O.1656.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 4/2008) of

the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial

dispute between the management of WCL, and their

workmen, received by the Central Government on

11-07-2013.

[ No. L-22012/306/2007-IR(CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

JABALPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/R/4/2008

PRESENT : SHRI R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer

General Secretary,

Samyukta Koyla Mazdoor Sangh (ATUC),

CRC Camp, Iklehra,

Distt Chhindwara,

Chhindwara

. . .Workman/Union

Versus

The Chief General Manager,

WCL, Pench Area,

PO Parasia,

Distt. Chhindwara (MP)

. . .Management

AWARD

Passed on this 20th. day of June, 2013

1. As per letter dated 3-1-2008 by the Government

of India, Ministry of Labour, .New. Delhi, the reference is

received. The reference is made. to this Tnbunal under

Section -10 of LD. Act, 1947 as per Notification. No.

L-22012/306/2007-IR(CM-II). The dispute under reference

relates to :

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4675

“Whether the action of the management of M/S

WCL in \dismissing the services of Shri Lalit

Kumar w.e.f. 16-6-05 is legal and justified? If not,

to what relief is the workman entitled?”

2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to

the parties. The workman failed to appear after service of

notice. As per order dated 22-11-2012, 1st party workman is

proceeded exparte. Management filed Written Statement.

3. The case of IInd party management disclosed from

its Written Statement is that workman was terminated from

16-6,-05. The dispute is referred in 2010 which is a very

belated stage. The workman was habitual absentee. Despite

of warning letters, there was no improvement in his

attendance. Chargesheet was issued to him on 7- 12-2002.

The workman failed to reply even after service of

chargesheet. The DE was conducted by Pench Area

Manager G.K.Gupta. Mr. A. Dutta was the Management

Representative. The details of Enquiry proceedings and

dates of hearings are elaborately given in the Written

Statement. It is submitted that the enquiry was proceeded

exparte, principles of natural justice were followed. The

workman failed to participate in enquiry proceeding and

defend him. The services of workman were terminated as

per order dated 16-5-05, no appeal was filed by workman.

On such ground, it is submitted that the termination of

service, of 1st party workman is legal.

4. Considering pleadings on record, the points which

arise for my consideration and determination are as under.

My findings are recorded against each of them for the

reasons as below :—

(i)

Whether the action of the

management of M/s WCL

In Affirmative

in dismissing the Services

of Shri Lalit Kumar w.e.f.

16-6-05 is legal?

(ii) If so, to what relief the

Relief prayed

workman is entitled to?”

by workman is

rejected.

REASONS

5. The reference is made for adjudication for dismissal

of service of workman. However the workman has failed to

appear in the proceeding in spite of notice. He is proceeded

exparte as per order dated 22-11-2012. The management

has filed affidavit of witness Shri Padmakar Paunikar. The

witness of the management has stated in writing about the

unauthorized absence and Departmental Enquiry held

against workman, different notices issued and public notice

published is also expressed. The evidence of witness

remained unchallenged. The workman failed to participate

in the proceeding. I do not find reason to disbelieve the

unchallenged evidence of management's witness. There is

no evidence to hold that the action of management in

dismissing service of Shri Lalit Kumar w.e.f. 16-6-05 is legal.

Therefore I record Point No.1 in Affirmative.

6. In the result, award is passed as under:—

(l) The action of the management of M/S WCL in

dismissing the services of Shri Lalit Kumar w.e.f.

16-6-05 is legal:

(2) Relief prayed by workman is rejected.

R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 11 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1657-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ

MCY;w lh ,y ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa

ds chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k

19@1992) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 11&07&2013

dks izkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y& 22012@390@1991&vkbZ vkj(lh,e&IIº

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 11th July, 2013

S.O.1657.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 19/92)

of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial

dispute between the management of WCL, and their

workmen, received by the Central Government on

11-07-2013.

[ No. L-22012/390/1991-IR(CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

JABALPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/R/19/92

PRESENT : SHRI R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer

General Secretary,

S.K.M.S (AITUC), PO Chandametta,

Distt. Chhindwara.

. .Workman/Union

Versus

The Manager,

Chandametta Colliery,

PO Chandametta,

Distt. Chhindwara

. . . Management

4676

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

AWARD

Passed on this 19th day of June, 2013

1. As per letter dated 9-1-92 by the Government of

India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is

received. The reference is made. to this Tribunal under

Section -10 of LD. Act, 1947 as per Notification. No. L-

22012/390/91-IR(C-II). The dispute under reference relates

to :

“Whether the action of the management i.e.

Manager, Chandametta Colliery of WCL, Pench

Area, PO Chandametta, Distt. Chhindwara (MP)

to stop from work to Smt. Bhagwati Bai D/o Gindu,

Ex-Wagon Loader of Chandametta: Colliery w.e.f.

6-1-1974 is proper and justified? If not, to what

relief are the said workman is entitled to?”

2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to

the parties. 1st party workman submitted her statement of

claim at Page 4/1 to 4/4. The case of 1st party workman is

that Bhagwati Bai, D/o Gindu was working as Wagon

Loader since seven years. On 7-12-71, she suffered injuries

while loading the wagon. Her both hands cut injuries. Her

right hand was amputed. Three fingers of left hand were

cut. That she was receiving treatment in Burkui Hospital.

She was discharge from said Hospital on 13-1-1972. That

injury certificate was issue from Hospital on 18-12-1972.

From 6-1-74, she had went Parmanand Hospital, Chhindwara

for fitting artificial hands. She was receiving treatment in

said Hospital from 24-6-74 to 30-6-75 Thereafter workman

was sent back to colliery. That she again received treatment

for fitting artificial hands during the period 7-4-75 to

11-4-75 even after artificial hands were fitted, she was

provided employment by the IInd party. She was asked to

produce disability certificate. Thereafter she submitted

disability certificate. She was no provided work.

3. The workman further submits that she had narrated

her grievance to Central Minister Mr. Kamalnath. He also

gave instruction to Branch Manager but workman was not

provided work. It is submitted that workman has become

unconscious while loading wagon. She fell on regulator

and her both hands were amputed. She received treatment

in WCL hospital as well as rehabilitation centre,

Chhindwara. She was not provided work. That the workman

is holding P.F.A/C No. A/4/8/1434. She claims compensation

of Rs. 20 Lakhs as IInd party failed to provide work to her.

4. IInd party filed Written Statement at Page 6/1 to

6/3. IInd party denied that workman was working m Its

mine. It is denied that she was stopped from work from

6-1-74. That the reference is highly belated as the dispute

is referred in 1992, therefore the reference is not tenable.

That as per provisions of Coal Mines Nationalisation Act,

the liability of WCL is only with regard to such employees

who are in the rolls of the private owners on the appointed

date i.e. 30-1-72. According to records on 30-1-73, Smt.

Bhagwati Bai was not on the rolls of Chandametta Colliery.

The reference speaks about stopping Smt. Bhagwati Bai

w.e.f. 6-1-74 . is incorrect. The reference is liable to be

rejected as her name is not appearing in the Form B Register.

On said ground, IInd party prays for rejection of claim of

the workman.

5. Workman filed rejoinder at Page 7/1 to 7/2

reiterating her earlier pleadings. Management submitted

rejoinder at Page 8/1 to 8/5 denying that the workman was

its employee, that name of workman was not appearing in

the rolls. Rest of all contentions of workman are denied by

the management.

6. Considering pleadings on record, the points which

arise for my consideration and determination are as, under.

My findings are recorded against each of them for the

reasons as below :—

i)

Whether the action of the

management i.e. Manager,

In Affirmative

Chandametta Colliery of

WCL, Pench Area, PO Chandametta

Dist. Chhindwara (MP) to stop

from work to Smt. Bhagwati

Bai D/o Gindu, Ex-Wagon

Loader of Chandametta

Colliery w.e.f. 6-1-1974

is legal?

(ii) If so, to what relief the

Relief prayed

workman is entitled to?”

by workman is

rejected.

REASONS

7. In order to substantiate her claim, the workman

has filed affidavit of her evidence. She has stated in her

evidence that she was working as Wagon Loader from

7-12-1971. She had lost her senses while loading wagon

and fell on regulator and both hands were amputed. She

received treatment in Hospital of Burkui Mines, Injury

Certificate was issued to her, she also received treatment in

Parmanand Hospital, Chhindwara. She. was admitted for

fitting artificial hands at Parmanand Hospital. That she was

not provided work despite of repeated request. In her cross-

examination, workman says she was doing work of wagon

loader from 4 years prior to December 1971. She had received

Token No., Identity Card, Coal Card, letter of appointment.

That accident slip was prepared. The said document was

submitted in hospital. Her hand was amputed in the

incident. She did not recollect her number. That about 200

labours were working as Wagon Loader. She has suffered

injury prior to nationalization of Mine in 1973. All 200

labours were absorbed in Coal Mines except her. That after

she was discharged from hospital, she has gone to Mine

office, she was kept sitting in office. She claims ignorance

whether after nationalization, list of employees of Private

owner was submitted. She also claims to be member of

INTUC Union. That her present age is about 60-62 years.

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4677

The evidence of workman is not supported by any

documents. The zerox copies of documents produced by

workman about her treatment in hospital and reports, no

witness is examined by workman to prove those documents.

Therefore those documents cannot be considered as legal

evidence.

8. The evidence of management's witness is by nature

of denial. Workman was working in IInd party Coal Mines,

The witness of the management has stated that name of

workman was not appearing in the list of employees received

from Private Employer. The witness of the management

Rajesh Sharma is not shattered in his cross-examination.

Contrary suggestion are denied by witness of the

management.

9. Learned counsel for IInd party Mr. Shashi submits

that the dispute is referred after 18 years highly belated is

not tenable. In support of his argument, learned counsel

relies in ratio held in case of —

“Assistant Executive Engineer, Karnataka Versus

Shivalinga reported in 2002-I-LLJ-457. Their

Lordship of the Apex Court dealing with delay

and latches held delay of more than 9 years in

approaching the Labour Officer was talked in

case.”

In case of Indian Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. Versus Prahlad

Singh reported in 2001-I-Supreme court Cases 424, Their

Lordship held Industrial Dispute raised after 13 long years

of termination of services as no reasonable explanation is

given for such delay, the Industrial Tribunal rightly refused

to grant any relief. .

In case of Nedungadi bank Ltd. versus

K.P.Madhavankutty reported in AIR-2000-SC-839 . Their

Lordship held the power of Government to make reference-

no time limit prescribed doesnot mean that power can be

exercised any point of time, still dispute cannot be referred.

In present case, no record is produced by workman

about her employment in Private Employer neither she has

produced legal evidence about her employment in WCL-

the IInd party after her discharge from hospital. As per her

evidence, her both hands were amputed, artificial hands

were fitter, she was not provided employment, no

documents are produced that her name was appearing in

the list of workman received from Private Employer. Her

name was not appearing in Form B Register. The workman

was stopped from work in 1974 and the dispute is referred

in 1992 after almost 18 years. No documents can be

preserved for such long time. Considering no evidence on

record, long delay in making reference, it is clear that the

claim of Ist party is not supported by satisfactory evidence.

Therefore action of management cannot be said illegal. For

above reasons, I record my finding in Point No.1 in

Affirmative.

10. In the result, award is passed as under :—

(1)

The action of the management i.e. Manager,

Chandametta Colliery of WCL, Pench Area, PO

Chandametta, Distt Chhindwara (MP) to stop from

work to Smt. Bhagwati Bai D/o Gindu, Ex-Wagon

Loader of Chandametta Colliery w.e.f. 6-1-1974 is

legal.

(2)

Relief prayed by workman is rejected.

R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 11 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1658-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ

bZ lh ,y ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds

chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vlulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k

21@2012) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 11&07&2013

dks izkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y& 22012@31@2012&vkbZ vkj(lh,e&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 11th July, 2013

S.O. 1658.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 21/2012)

of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial

dispute between the management of J. K. Nagar Colliery,

M/s. E.C. Ltd., and their workmen, received by the Central

Government on 11-07-2013.

[ No. L-22012/31/2012-IR(CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

ASANSOL

PRESENT : SHRI JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding

Officer

REFERENCE NO. 21 of 2012

PARTIES : The management of J.K. Nagar Colliery, M/s.

ECL, Burdwan(WB)

Vs.

The Sri D.K. ROUTH, BRANCH Jt. Secy., CMC(HMS),

Aradanga, Asansol, (W.B.)

4678

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

REPRESENTATIVES :

For the management :

Sri P.K. Das, Ld. Advocate

For the union (Workman) :

Sri D.K. Routh, Ld.

Representative

INDUSTRY : Coal

STATE: West Bengal

Dated - 16-04-13

AWARD

In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-

section(1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947), Govt. of India

through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L-22012/

31/2012-I.R.(CM-II) dated 19.04.12 has been pleased to refer

the following dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of J. K.

Nagar Colliery of M/s. ECL in not payment HRA

@ 10% of Basic Pay to Sri Taran Chandra Paul

while he was posted at J. K. Nagar, Raniganj is fair

and justified? To what relief the concerned

workman is entitled to ?”

Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/31/

2012-I.R. (CM-II) dated 19.04.12 of the above said reference

from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for

adjudication of the dispute, a reference case No. 21 of 2012

was registered on 08-05-12 and accordingly an order to

that effect was passed to issue notices through the

registered post to the parties concerned directing them to

appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their written

statements along with the relevant documents and a list of

witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance of the

said order notices by the registered post were sent to the

parties concerned.

On perusal of the case record, it has been found that

Sri D.K. Routh, Branch Jt. Secretary of the Union, has

prayed for the closure of the case as the workman is not

interested to proceed with the case. Since "the workman is

not interested to proceed with the case, the case is closed

and accordingly an order of "No Dispute Award" is hereby

passed.

ORDER

Let an “Award” be and the same is passed as “No

Dispute” existing. Send the copies of the order to the Govt.

of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for information and

needful. The reference is accordingly disposed of.

JAY ANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 11 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1659-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj jhtuy

eSustj] lSUVªjy os;jgkm¯lx dkjiksjs'ku] Hkksiky ds izca/ra=k ds

lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V

vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k tcyiqj

ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k lh-th-vkbZ-Vh-@,y-lh-@vkj-@101@2000)

dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 28&06&2013 dks

izkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y& 42011@02@2000&vkbZ vkj(Mh;w)º

lkse ukFk] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 11th July, 2013

S.O.1659.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGIT/

LC/R/101/2000) of the Central Government Industrial

Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the

Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers

in relation to the management of the Regional Manager,

Central Warehousing Corporation, Bhopal and their

workman which was received by the Central Government

on 28-06-2013.

[ No. L-42011/02/2000-IR(DU)]

SOM NATH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

JABLPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/R/101/2000

SHRI R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer

General Secretary,

Central Warehousing Corporation Employees Union,

C/o Central Ware housing Corporation,

52-53, Amar Niwas,

Bhopal (MP)

.....Workman/Union

Versus

Personnel Manager,

Central Warehousing Corporation,

4/1, Siri Institutional Area,

Hauz Khas,

New Delhi.

Regional Manager,

Central Warehousing Corporation,

Regional Office,

52-53, Amar Niwas,

Bhopal (MP)

....Managements

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4679

AWARD

Passed on this 20th day of March 2013

1. As per letter dated 2-6-2000 by the Government of

India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is

received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under

Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.L-42011/

2/2000/IR(M). The dispute under reference relates to:

“Whether the action of the management of Central

Warehousing Corporation in transferring and

relieving Shri G.S.Gupta, Shri Mansingh, Shri Indal

Singh and Shri Sureshchand from their respective

places by way of using colourable exercise of

power and unfair labour practice is justified? If

not, to what relief the workmen are entitled?”

2. After receipt of reference and notices issued to the

parties, the Union filed statement of claim at Page

2/1 to 2/6. The contention of the Union is that there is no

transfer policy in establishment of Central Ware Housing

Corporation. The IInd party management is using transfer

as tool to victimize the members of this Trade Union. That

the IInd party is empowered to transfer Class-IV staff but

such power cannot be used to favour one set of workers. It

is alleged that IInd party has shown favour to members of

unrecognized Union and members of 1st party Union are

encouraged to join membership of unrecognized Union.

That staff from Khandwa and other sector is transferred

without providing substitute. The orders are cancelled or

kept in abeyance to create vacancies at Khandwa. That

IInd party contravened provisions of I.D.Act, committed

unfair labour practice in Schedule IV by encouraging

members of Trade Union discriminating the workman. The

transfer is malafide. That Ilnd party issued instructions to

Ware House Manager, Satna to relieve Shri Suresh Chandra.

That Shri Jagmohan is still enjoying stay who is member of

the unrecognized Union. The grievances was submitted

before ALC(C), Bhopal IInd party arranged to relieve Iqbal

Ali for Khandwa. He has not joined. It is alleged that Shri

Mansingh from Gwalior, Shri Vijay Kumar from Morena,

Shri D. K. Shukla from Morena, Shri Home Singh from Indore,

Shri O. P. Singh from Indore, Shri Bharat Singh, Morena

and Shri Nepal Singh, Morena are transferred. Their transfer

is stayed or cancelled to favour of unrecognized Union.

The transfer order are issued by way of victimazation.

Union prayed for setting aside the same.

3. IInd party/management filed Written Statement

denying allegations of 1st party/workman, That the

Corporation has its own recruitment rules and service

conditions duly approved by the Government and notified

in the Gazette of India. The services of the employees are

governed under these regulations called CWC Staff

Regulations 1986. The corporation has 17 Regional offices

all over the country and Bhopal region is one of them which

is running 38 units in different parts of MP and Chhattisgarh

State. That Bhopal Region has a biggest Warehouse. That

warehouse Khandwa has a capacity of 90,000 MT. FCI is

major depositor at Khandwa. That prior to posting of three

employees namely Shri G.S.Gupta, Mansingh, and Suresh

Chandra, there were only 3 JTAs against sanctioned

strength of 16 JTAs for the preservation of the food grain

at Central Warehouse Khandwa. That the pesticide

treatment and fumigation work cannot be carried out to

preserve heavy stock of foodgrain. Keeping in view the

pressing need of technical staff at CWC, Khandwa the

management issued transfer order leading to the dispute

by Union. It is submitted that the transfer orders of those

persons have been issued without malafide intention. The

allegations are denied. The detailed reasons in respect of

transfer of Shri Shri G.S.Gupta, Shri Mansingh, Shri Indal

Singh and Shri Sureshchand are given. It is denied that

members of the unrecognized Union are shown favour and

for encouraging its membership, the transfer orders are

issued by way of victimization. IInd party/management

prays for rejection of claim of 1st party.

4. Considering pleadings on record, the points which

arise for my consideration and determination are as under.

My findings are recorded against each of them for the

reasons as below :—

(i)

Whether the management

of Central Warehousing

In Negative

Corporation in transferring

and relieving Shri G. S. Gupta,

Shri Mansingh, Shri Indal

Singh and Shri Sureshchand

from their respective places

by way of using colourable

exercise of power and unfair

labour practice is justified?

(ii) If not, what relief the work-

Claim of 1st Party

man is entitled to ?”

is rejected.

5. Ist party/Union challenging order of transfer of 4

of its members Shri G.S.Gupta, Shri Mansingh, Shri Indal

Singh and Shri Sureshchand alleging that the transfer orders

are issued to victimize members of the Union with malafide

intention. It is alleged that orders are issued to encourage

membership of unrecognized Union. That transfer is not

condition of service. IInd party is contending that the

transfer orders are issued considering need of the trained

staff for protection of stocks at CWC, Khandra. Union has

failed to adduce evidence. Union is proceeded exparte on

6-4-2011. The management filed affidavit of witness 8hri

Mritunjoy Kumar Verma covering all its contentions that

the transfer orders are issued considering the requirement

of staff.

6. The allegations of Union that transfer orders are

issued with malafide intention or by way of victimization in

colourable exercise of powers are not supported by any

4680

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

evidence. Therefore allegation of Union cannot be

accepted. For above reasons, I record my finding on Point

No.1 in Negative.

7. In the result, award is passed as under:—

“(1) The transfer order of Shri G.S.Gupta, Shri

Mansingh, Shri Indal Singh and Shri Sureshchand

issued by management of Central Ware Housing

Corporation is legal.

(2) Relief prayed by 1st party/Union is rejected.”

R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 11 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1660-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj fMoh”kuy

jsyos eSustj] foykliqj ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds

deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k tcyiqj

ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k lh-th-vkbZ-Vh-@,y-lh-@vkj-@139@93) dks

izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 28&06&2013 dks izkIr

gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y& 41012@54@1992&vkbZ vkj(Mh;wº

lkse ukFk] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 11th July, 2013

S.O. 1660.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGIT/

LC/R/139/93) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in

the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to

the management of The Divisional Railway Manager,

Bilaspur and their workman which was received by the

Central Government on 28-06-2013.

[ No. L-41012/54/1992-IR(DU)]

SOM NATH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

JABLPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/R/139/93

SHRI R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer

Shri Kailash Rao,

S/o Late Mukund,

Railway Colony,

Bhilai-3, Distt. Durg

. . .Workman

Versus

Divisional Railway Manager,

South Eastern Railway,

Bilaspur

. . . Management

AWARD

Passed on this 2nd day of May, 2013

1. As per letter dated 21-1-93 by the Government of

India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is

received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under

Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification

No. L-41012/54/92-IR(DU). The dispute under reference

relates to:

“Whether the action of the management of South

Eastern Railway, Bilaspur Division in terminating

the

services

of

Shri

Kailash

Rao,

s/o Late Mukunda Gangman, w.e.f. 29-9-90 is

justified? If not, what relief is the workman is

entitled to?”

2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to

the parties. 1st, party workman submitted his statement of

claim at page 3/1 to 3/6 of record. The case of 1st party

workman is that he was appointed on 24-2-90 as Gangman

as per appointment letter dated 31-2-90. Howeveer without

giving any order in writing, his services were orally

terminated w.e.f. 29-9-90. He submits that he was continued

in service without break, without assigning any reason,

was prevented from doing duties. That he was going to the

office of the IInd party. That he was orally prohibited from

duty. That there can be no oral tennination order. That in

absence of order of termination in writing, it is deemed to

be in service. That orally he was informed that his services

were terminated for using incorrect casual cards. According

to him, casual cards are not precedent for employment and

that could not be a reason for terminating his services.

That he was not allowed reasonable opportunity. To explain

his case, he has referred to case held in AIR 1978-SC-597—

Maneka Gandhi Versus Union of India., He. has also quoted

ratio held in case of Divisional Suptd., Central Railway,

Jabalpur in 1969 (1) LLJ- 705. He reiterated that oral

termination without giving opportunity of hearing is illegal.

The termination of his service amounts to retrenchment of

I.D. Act. The Railways are employing many persons without

giving chance to him. That he was working in regular post,

vacancies are still existing. Hundreds of persons similarly

situated are retrenched in service. Only some persons are

removed on ground of submitting false card. Their

termination is unjust, unfair and violative of article 14 of

the Costitution. That he had completed 120 days service

and attained temporary status as provided in Indian Railway

Establishment Manual. He is entitled to certain rights as in

Para 2.5.11 of Railway Establishment Manual. It is submitted

that the services of workman cannot be terminated on

charges of obtaining employment producing false

document without following procedure in the department

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4681

rules. He submits that his termination from service is

violative of natural justice and mandatory provisions of

law. He also submits that his services are terminated in

violation of Section 25-F of I.D. Act. He was not served

with notice. No retrenchment compensation was paid. That

in several other cases filed before CAT at

Jabalpur the orders were passed holding the termination

order illegal. Workman prays similar relief of reinstatement

with back wages with regularization of service.

3. IInd party filed Written Statement at Page 6/1 to

6/7. It is case of Ilnd party that 1st party was engaged as

casual Gangman from 14-2-90 subject to conditions that if

the documents produced by him are found false at any

time during their engagement, their service would be

terminated automatically without any notice. The service

certificate produced by him was found bogus. His services

is terminated from 25-9-90 as per conditions in the deptt.

rules and services. 150 candidates were terminated

including the 1st party workman.

4. It is submitted that 1st party workman was not

holding civil post under Union of India nor he held any

civil post earlier. The case of the applicant was of forgery

with the Railway Administration. He was not an employee,

he is not entitled to protection under I.D. Act, 1947. It is

reiterated that 1st party workman was engaged as casual

gangman on daily rate of pay. He was posted under the

CPWI Abhanpur on 24-2-90. The workman was engaged

subject to the condition laid down in the appointment letter.

As the service certificate is found false after verification,

his services are terminated from 25-9-90. The above facts

are the repeated in the Written Statement. The certificate of

service produced by employees found genuine after

verification of service. That out of 861 casual candidates,

services of 150 casual candidates were terminated as the

certificate produced by them were found false after

verification. Other contentions of 1st party workman are

denied. It is denied that 1st party workman is entitled to

reinstatement. That workman had not completed 240 days

continuous service. IInd party prayed for rejection of the

relief prayed by 1st party workman.

5. Ist party workman filed rejoinder at page 7/1 to 7/2.

It is not correct that the workman was not employed only

on the basis of the past service card. There is no rule or

regulation in Railway requiring production of casual labour

card for the purpose of appointment. Workman was not

aware of the said documents. He denies that he had

submitted false and fabricated document of service card. It

is denied that his claim is not permissible under I.D. Act. It

is submitted that he had not obtained appointment by

producing false card. That the termination on the allegation

of producing false service card casting stigma and therefore

Departmental Enquiry is necessary. He further submits that

principles of natural justice was violated and terminated

his services.

6. Though termination in reference show from

29-9-90, as per pleadings termination is from 25-9-90.

Considering pleadings on record, the points which arise

for my consideration and determination are as under. My

findings are recorded against each of them for the reasons

as below:—

(i) Whether the action of the

In Affirmative

management of South Eastern

Railway, Bilaspur Division in

terminating the services of Shri

Kailash Rao, s/o Late Mukunda

Gangman, w.e.f.

25-9-90 is

justified?

(ii) If so, to what relief the

Ist party workman

workman is entitled to?"

is not entitled to

relief prayed by him.

REASONS

7. Ist party workman is challenging his termination

w.e.f. 29-9-90 for the allegations being produced false

service certificate/casual labour card. It is contented by

him that he was not given any opportunity before

terminating the services nor enquiry was held, no notice

was issued, principles of natural justice violated, action of

management is violative of Article 20 of the Constitution of

India. All those contentions are denied by IInd party.

However IInd party has not disputed that 1st party workman

was engaged as casual labour from 14-2-90 and his services

were terminated from 25-9-90. The workman had worked

for about 7 months 11 days. Workman filed affidavit of

evidence covering his contentions in Statement of claim.

The date of his appointment and termination shows that

he has completed 120 days service, he had attained status

of temporary employee as per statutory provisions

contained in Indian Railway Establishment Manual- Para

2511. In his affidavit of evidence, he has stated that he has

never submitted casual card for getting employment as

casual labour. That there is no rule or regulation in Railway

which require casual labour card for getting appointment.

He has stated that similar cases were filed before CAT,

Jabalpur. It was held that the service of casual employee

was terminated on the ground that he had obtained

employment by producing false card without holding

enquiry. In his evidence in cross-examination, Ist party

workman says that in para-4 of the affidavit of evidence

contents relates to casual labour card and not require for

purpose of employment, no questions are asked with respect

to other averments of 1st party workman. However the

copy of appointment order Exhibit M-1 finds clear condition

that the working certificate/caste certificate/service

certificate if found false at any time during their engagement

the service will be terminated automatically without any

notice. Para in bottom of Exhibit M-1 finds clear reference

4682

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

to past service certificate/service certificates. The said

appointment order was issued on 14-2-90 as stated by 1st

party in his statement of claim and affidavit of evidence, it

is clear that if the casual labour card found service, the

services are liable to be terminated without notice. The

documents Exhibit M-2 is the order of termination dated

25-9-90 refers to the discharge of 1st party workman. The

reason shown against his name is "produced false

certificate”.

8. The evidence of management's witness Shri R.S.

Bepari on affidavit has stated that the false casual gangmen

after bifurcation from Bilaspur Division, all cases of Raipur

Division related to false cases of gangmen were transferred

to Raipur. Similar cases were filed before CAT, Jabalpur

and the matters were taken before Hon'ble High Court,

Chhattisgarh. Which were remitted back by to CAT, Jabalpur

and are pending. That appointment were made with the

condition that if the certificate submitted by them were

false, their services will be automatically terminated. The

files and documents were stolen from the chamber of

Administrative Officer, Shri Bhasker Rao by breaking the

lock of the Almirah. FIR was filed by the management. In

his cross-examination, the management's witness says that

he was not working when the employee were discharged.

The engagement letter were given as casual gangman. The

fake certificate were stolen from the office of the Railway.

He was unable to tell from which place those certificates

were issued. For security of record, no guard was posted.

Deliberation was made and certificates were found fake.

He was unable to tell the name of the Verifying Officer.

That he had seen verification report and report on its basis.

In view of the verification report, documents were found

fake. In case of casual employee, it is not necessary to hold

departmental enquiry.

9. Learned counsel for 1st party workman Mr. Shashi

heavily emphasized that the employee was not given

opportunity of hearing. That even 240 days service is not

completed. The dispute is tenable. That the services of 1st

party workman are terminated on the ground that he

submitted false certificate casting stigma, no enquiry was

held, no opportunity of hearing was given and therefore

the allegation of cheating, forgery were made. Therefore

the termination of service is illegal. In reply, learned counsel

for Ilnd party management supports the order of

termination. That 1st party workman has not completed

240 days, he is not holding civil post. Ist party workman is

not entitled to protection of article 311 of the constitution

of India. That his services are not governed by CCS Rules

and prays for rejection of relief prayed by Ist party

workman.

10. Learned counsel for 1st party Mr. Shashi relies

on—

Ratio held in the case of Nepal Singh Versus State

of U.P reported in AIR 1990 Supreme Court 1459.

Their Lordship of the Apex Court held an order

terminating the services of a temporary

Government servant and ex facie innocuous in

that it does not cast any stigma on the Government

Servant or visits him with penal consequences

must be regarded as effecting a termination

simpliciter, but it is discovered on the basis of

material adduced that although innocent in its

terms the order was passed infact with a view to

punishing the Government servant, it is a punitive

order which can be passed only after complying

with Article 311.

From reading para-2 of the judgment, it is clear that case

before their Lordship was relating to temporary Sub

Inspector of Police posted at Shajapur. 1st party workman

is not holding any civil post, he was not regular employee

of the Railway. Therefore Article 311 is not applicable in

the present case.

From reading of Article 311, it is clear that the said article

only extends protection to the person who is member of

Civil Service of Union and All India Service or Civil Service

of State or holds a civil post under Union of a State.

Therefore the ratio in above cited case cannot be applied

to the case at my hand.

11. Next reliance is placed by Mr. Shashi in ratio held

in case of—

Shri Anoop Jaiswal versus Government of India

and Another reported in 1984(2) Supreme Court

Cases 369. Their Lordship held order punitive in

nature which in absence of any proper enquiry

amounted to violation of Article 311 (2) of the

Constitution, hence the order is liable to be set

aside to be reinstated in service with full benefits.

The case before their Lordship relate to

appointment of probationer as IPS Officer. Delay

was alleged on his part for P.T/unarmed combat

practice.

'The workman was engaged as casual labour hardly worked

for about 7 months, was not holding any civil post therefore

the ratio in above cited case cannot be applied to the

present case at hand.

In case of Bhagwan Singh Rawat versus State of

MP and Others reported in 2003(4) M.P.H.T. 309,

the allegation against petitioner is of making

demand of illegal gratification. Removal from the

post of Agriculture Member. It was held by his

Lordship that until unless petitioner is found guilty

of demanding illegal gratification and charge is

established petitioner could not be fastened with

the penalty of removal.

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4683

As the workman is not holding any civil post neither he is

regular employee of the Railway, the ratio held in the case

cannot be applied to the present case at hand.

Reliance is placed on ratio held in case of Radha

Mohan Goswami and others versus State of

Madhya Pradesh and others reported in 2004(2)

M.P.H.T. 49. His Lordship considering the

petitioners were appointed on daily wage basis,

the same persons were appointed on daily wage.

In compliance of these orders they joined their

posts. Suddenly order of regularization in favour

of employees cancelled on 10-6-2003. Against this

cancellation, his Lordship held right accrued to

petitioners when the order was passed on

3-6-2003. An administrative order having adverse

effect on accrued right of employee without giving

him opportunity of hearing is unsustainable.

Hence order dated 10-6-2003 cancelling order of

regularization dated 3-6-03 was quashed.

In present case, 1st party workman was never regularized.

The facts of above cited case are not comparable. The

facts of the above said case cannot be beneficially applied

to the case at hand.

12. Counsel for IInd party Shri Tripathi has produced

copy of Indian Railway Establishment—

Para 2001 Clause I(b) provides that casual labours

are also engaged on Railways for execution of

Railway projects, such as new lines, doubling,

conversion, construction of buildings, track

renewals, route relay interlocking Railway

electrification, Setting up of new units etc. Casual

Labour so engaged are referred to as project

Casual Labour. Such of those casual labour

engaged on open line (revenue) works, who

continue to do the same work for which they were

engaged or other work of the same type for more

than 120 days without a break will be treated a

temporary on completion of 120 days continuous

employment.

However Para-2004 of the said manual provides

that notice is necessary under any statutory

obligation, no notice is required for termination

of service of casual labour.

Condition in Exhibit M-l shows that if the service certificate

produced by such gangman found false after verification.

The services are liable to be terminated without notice. 1st

party workman accepted the said appointment order and

joined the service therefore said condition No.1 is binding

on him. He cannot be permitted to claim contrary to the

said condition. That the copies of judgment in several matter

by Hon'ble CAT, Ahmadabad and Jabalpur are produced

on record but the judgment in R/191/91 by CGIT, Jabalpur,

the facts are not comparable and the jurisdiction of CAT is

wide whereas the jurisdiction of this Tribunal is limited to

decide the reference under I.D. Act. Therefore the judgments

delivered by CAT in different cases are not binding.

13. Rule 3(1) of CCS Rules clearly provides that those

rules are not applicable to the Railway servant.

14. The legal position with respect to the jurisdiction,

powers of Central Administrative Tribunal together

provided in Section 14 of the Administrative Tribunal's

Act, 1985 is clear that the casual labours acquiring

temporary status does not become a temporary Railway

Servant or a member of Railway Service Card holder under

Railway. Section 14 (1)(A) is not attracted to the

consideration of the Tribunal.

15. Learned counsel for 1st party Mr. Shashi during

further course of argument submitted that 1st party

workman is covered under Sectin 2(s) of I.D. Act. The

establishment of IInd party is covered as Industry under

Section 2(j) of the I.D. Act. That the dispute defined under

Section 2(k) covers difference between employees employer

between employers and workman etc. The appropriate

Government is Central Government, reference is made. The

reference is tenable. The services were terminated without

notice or giving opportunity of hearing. Therefore the

termination of service of 1st party workman is illegal.

Chapter V-A of I.D. Act dealing with retrenchment under

Section 25-B of I.D. Act provides continuous service within

meaning of clause (1) for a period of one year if the employee

worked for 240 days during preceding 12 calendar months.

1st party workman has not completed 240 days continuous

service therefore he is not covered as workman under

Section 25(B) of I.D. Act. For said reason, 1st party

workman is not entitled to protection under Section 25-F

clause (a), (b) of I.D. Act. He is not entitled to notice prior

to his termination or retrenchment compensation provided

under clause (b)b of Section 25-F. That when service

certificate produced by him is found false, no notice is

required as per the condition in Exhibit M-l. For above

reasons, I record finding on Point No.1 in Affirmative.

16. Point No.2— In view of my finding in Point No.1

that the termination of services of 1st party workman is

legal, the workman is not entitled to any relief prayed by

him. Accordingly I record in my finding on point No. 2.

17. In the result, award is passed as under :—

(1) Termination of 1st party workman Shri Kailash

Rao w.e.f. 29-9-90 by IInd party management is

legal.

(2) Reliefs prayed by 1st party workman Shri Kailash

Rao is rejected.

R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer

4684

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ubZ fnYyh] 11 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1661-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj fMfotuy

jsyos eSustj] fcykliqj ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds

deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh;

ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV

(lanHkZ la[;k lhthvkbZVh@,ylh@vkj@154@96) dks çdkf'kr

djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 28&6&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹iQk- la- ,y&41012@24@1992&vkbZ vkj (Mh;w)º

lkse ukFk] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 11th July, 2013

S.O. 1661.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Diputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT/

LC/R/154/96) of the Central Government Industrial

Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the

Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers

in relation to the management of The Divisonal Railway

Manager, Bilaspur and their workman which was received

by the Central Government on 28-6-2013.

[ F. No. L-41012/24/1992-IR(DU)]

SOM NATH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT,

JABALPUR

No. CGIT/LC/R/154/96

SHRI R.B. P ATLE : Presiding Officer

Shri P.Venkatswamy,

Cut Cabin, Rameshwar Nagar,

Bhanpuri,

PO WRS, Raipur .......Workman

Versus

Divisional Railway Manager,

South Eastern Railway,

Bilaspur .......Management

AWARD

Passed on this 2nd day of May 2013

1. As per letter dated 6-8-96 by the Government of

India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is

received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under

Section-10 of I.D. Act, 1947 as per Notification No.

L-41012/24/92-IR(DU). The dispute under reference

relates to :

“Whether the action of the management of DRM,

S. E. Railway, Bilaspur in terminating the services

of Shri P.Venkatswamy is legal and justified? If

not, to what relief is the workman entitled?”

2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to

the parties. Ist party workman submitted his statement

of claim at page 2/1 to 2/4 of record. The case of Ist

party workman is that he was appointed on 15- 2-90 as

Gangman as per appointment letter dated 15-2-90.

However without giving any order in writing, his services

were orally terminated w.e.f. 19-4-90. He submits that he

was continued in service without break, without

assigning any reason, was prevented from doing duties.

That he was going to the office of the IInd Party. That

he was orally prohibited from duty. That there can be no

oral termination order. That in absence of order of

termination in writing, it is deemed to be in service. That

orally he was informed that his services were terminated

for using incorrect casual cards. According to him, casual

cards are not precedent for employment and that could

not be a reason for terminating his services. That he was

not allowed reasonable opportunity. To explain his case,

he has referred to case held in AIR 1978-SC-597 - Maneka

Gandhi Versus Union of India. He has also quoted ratio

held in case of Divisional Suptd., Central Railway,

Jabalpur in 1969 (1) LLJ-705. He reiterated that oral

termination without giving opportunity of hearing is

illegal. The termination of his service amounts to

retrenchment of I.D.Act. The Railways are employing

many persons without giving chance to him. That he

was working in regular post, vacancies are still existing.

Hundreds of persons similarly situated are retrenched in

service. Only some persons are removed on ground of

submitting false card. Their termination is unjust, unfair

and violative of article 14 of the Constitution. That he

had completed 120 days service and attained temporary

status as provided in Indian Railway Establishment

Manual. He is entitled to certain rights as in Para 2-5-

11 of Railway Establishment Manual . It is submitted

that the services of workman cannot be terminated on

charges of obtaining employment producing false

document without following procedure in the department

rules. He submits that his termination from service is

violative of natural justice and mandatory provisions of

law. He also submits that his services are terminated in

violation of Section 25-F of I.D. Act. He was not served

with notice. No retrenchment compensation was paid.

That in several other cases filed before CAT at Jabalpur

the orders were passed holding the termination order

illegal. Workman prays similar relief of reinstatement with

back wages with regularization of service.

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4685

3. IInd party filed Written Statement at Page 7/1 to

7/6. It is case of IInd party that Ist party was engaged

as casual Gangman from 15-2-90 subject to conditions

that if the documents produced by him are found false

at any time during their engagement, their service would

be terminated automatically without any notice. The

service certificate produced by him was found bogus.

His services is terminated from 19-4-90 as per conditions

in the deptt. rules and services. 150 candidates were

terminated including the Ist party workman.

4. It is submitted that Ist party workman was not

holding civil post under Union of India nor he held any

civil post earlier. The case of the applicant was of forgery

with the Railway Administration. He was not an

employee, he is not entitled to protection under I.D. Act,

1947. It is reiterated that Ist party workman was engaged

as casual gangman on daily rate of pay. He was posted

under the CPWI Abhanpur on 15- 2-90. The workman

was engaged subject to the condition laid down in the

appointment letter. As the service certificate is found

false after verification, his services are terminated from

19-4-90. The above facts are the repeated in the Written

Statement. The certificate of service produced by

employees found genuine after verification of service

That out of 861 casual candidates, services of 150 casual

candidates were terminated as the certificate produced

by them were found false after verification. Other

contentions of Ist party workman are denied. It is denied

that Ist party workman is entitled to reinstatement. That

workman had not completed 240 days continuous service.

IInd party prayed for rejection of the relief prayed by Ist

party workman.

5. Considering pleadings on record, the points

which arise for my consideration and determination are

as under. My findings are recorded against each of them

for the reasons as below:—

(i) Whether the action InAffirmative

of the management of

South Eastern Railway,

Bilaspur Division

terminating the services

of Shri P.Venkatswamy w.e.f.

19-4-90 is justified?

(ii) If so, to what relief Ist party workman is

workman is entitled to?" not entitled to relief

prayed by him.

REASONS

6. Ist party workman is challenging his termination

w.e.f. 19-4-90 for the allegations being produced false

service certificate/casual labour card. It is contented by

him that he was not given any opportunity before

terminating the services nor enquiry was held no notice

was issued, principles of natural justice violated, action

of management is violative of Article 20 of the

Constitution of India. All those contentions are denied

by IInd party. However IInd party has not disputed that

Ist party workman was engaged as casual labour from

15-2-90 and his services were terminated from 19-4-90 ..

Workman filed affidavit of evidence covering his

contentions in Statement of claim. Ist party workman in

his evidence on affidavit has stated that he was

appointed on 15-2-90 as Gangman. His services were

terminated from 19-4-90. He hardly worked for 2 months,

4 days. Casual cards are not condition precedent for

employment. Termination of his services without hearing

is nullity. That he was working on regular post and

vacancies are still existing. His termination amounts to

retrenchment. His services are terminated without enquiry

or without giving opportunity of hearing mandatory

provisions of Section 25-F not complied. He should

have been afforded opportunity of hearing/defence.

Workman in his cross-examination says that he was

appointed in February 1983, 2nd time he was appointed

on 1990, he worked for 2 months, he was not told reasons

for termination. He himself has not pleaded in his

statement of claim about bogus service certificate, it is

written by Advocate. No FIR was submitted against him.

That he has submitted certificate of date of birth. The

appointment letter is produced along with affidavit of

management's witness Shri R.S. Bepari. Condition No.1

provides if the service certificate found false, their

services will be terminated without notice. The past

service certificate finds reference. In bottom para of the

appointment order, Ist party workman accepted such

conditions and joined the service.

7. The evidence of management's witness Shri

Lingaraj rout is filed covering all contents in Written

statement filed by the management. His evidence in

cross-examination shows that he has no personal

knowledge about the termination/discharge. He has filed

affidavit of evidence on the basis of available record. He

only claim ignorance whether appointment order was

produced on record or not. He has no knowledge about

the verification of the certificate.

8. Learned counsel for Ist party workman Mr. Shashi

heavily emphasized that the employee was not given

opportunity of hearing. That even 240 days service is

not completed. The dispute is tenable.That the services

of Ist party workman are terminated on the ground that

he submitted false certificate casting stigma, no enquiry

was held, no opportunity of hearing was given and

therefore the allegation of cheating, forgery were made.

Therefore the termination of service is illegal. In reply,

learned counsel for IInd party management supports the

order of termination. That Ist party workman has not

completed 240 days, he is not holding civil post. Ist

party workman is not entitled to protection of article 311

4686

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

of the constitution of India. That his services are not

governed by CCS Rules and prays for rejection of relief

prayed by Ist party workman.

9. Learned counsel for Ist party Mr. Shashi relies

on—

Ratio held in the case of Nepal Singh Versus State

of U.P. reported in AIR 1990 Supreme Court 1459.

Their Lordship of the Apex Court held an order

terminating the services of a temporary Government

servant and ex-facie innocuous in that it does not

cast any stigma on the Government Servant or

visits him with penal consequences must be

regarded as effecting a termination simpliciter, but

it is discovered on the basis of material adduced

that although innocent in its terms the order was

passed infact with a view to punishing the

Government servant, it is a punitive order which

can be passed only after complying with Article

311.

From reading para-2 of the judgment, it is clear

that case before their Lordship was relating to temporary

Sub Inspector of Police posted at Shajapur. Ist party

workman is not holding any civil post, he was not regular

employee of the Railway. Therefore Article 311 is not

applicable in the present case.

From reading of Article 311, it is clear that the said

article only extends protection to the person who is

member of Civil Service of Union and All India Service

or Civil service of State or holds a civil post under

Union of a State. Therefore the ratio in above cited case

cannot be applied to the case at my hand.

10. Next reliance is placed by Mr. Shashi in ratio

held in case of—

Shri Anoop Jaiswal versus Government of India

and another reported in 1984(2) Supreme Court

Cases 369. Their Lordship held order punitive in

nature which in absence of any proper enquiry

amounted to violation of Article 311 (2) of the

Constitution, hence the order is liable to be set

aside to be reinstated in service with full benefits.

The case before their Lordship relate to

appointment of probationer as IPS Officer. Delay

was alleged on his part for P.T/unarmed combat

practice.

The workman was engaged as casual labour hardly

worked for about 2 months, was not holding any civil

post therefore the ratio in above cited case cannot be

applied to the present case at hand.

In case of Bhagwan Singh Rawat versus State of

MP and Others reported in 2003(4) M.P.H.T. 309, the

allegation against petitioner is of making demand of

illegal gratification. Removal from the post of Agriculture

Member. It was held by his Lordship that until unless

petitioner is found guilty of demanding illegal gratification

and charge is established petitioner could not be fastened

with the penalty of removal.

As the workman is not holding any civil post

neither he is regular employee of the Railway, the ratio

held in the case cannot be applied to the present case

at hand.

Reliance is placed on ratio held in case of Radha

Mohan Goswami and Others versus State of Madhya

Pradesh and Others reported in 2004(2) M.P.H.T. 49.

his Lordship considering the petitioners were

appointed on daily wage basis, the same persons

were appointed on daily wage. In compliance of

these orders they joined their posts. Suddenly order

of regularization in favour of employees cancelled

on 10-6-2003. Against this cancellation, his Lordship

held right accrued to petitioners when the order

was passed on 3-6-2003.An administrative order

having adverse effect on accrued right of employee

without giving him opportunity of hearing is

unsustainable. Hence order dated 10-6-2003

cancelling order of regularization dated 3-6-2003 was

quashed.

In present case, Ist party workman was never

regularized. The facts of above cited case are not

comparable. The facts of the above said case cannot be

beneficially applied to the case at hand.

11. Counsel for IInd party Shri Tripathi has

produced copy of Indian Railway Establishment.

Para 2001 Clause I(b) provides that casual labours

are also engaged on Railways for execution of

Railway projects, such as new lines, doubling,

conversion, construction of buildings, track

renewals, route relay interlocking Railway

electrification. Setting up of new units etc. Casual

Labour so engaged are referred to as project Casual

Labour. Such of those casual labour engaged on

open line (Revenue) works, who continue to do

the same work for which they were engaged or

other work of the same type for more than 120

days without a break will be treated as temporary

on completion of 120 days continuous

employment.

However Para-2004 of the said manual provides

that notice is necessary under any statutory obligation,

no notice is required for termination of service of casual

labour.

Condition in Exhibit M-l shows that if the service

certificate produced by such gangman found false after

verification. The services are liable to be terminated

without notice. 1st party workman accepted the said

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4687

appointment order and joined the service therefore said

condition No.1 is binding on him. He cannot be permitted

to claim contrary to the said condition. That the copies

of judgment in several matter by Hon'ble CAT,

Ahmedabad and Jabalpur are produced on record but

the judgment in R/191/91 by CGIT, Jabalpur, the facts are

not comparable and the jurisdiction of CAT is wide

whereas the jurisdiction of this Tribunal is limited to

decide the reference under I.D. Act. Therefore the

judgments delivered by CAT in different cases are not

binding.

12. Rule 3(1) of CCS Rules clearly provides that

those rules are not applicable to the Railway servant.

13. The legal position with respect to the

jurisdiction, powers of Central Administrative Tribunal

together provided in Section 14 of the Administrative

Tribunal's Act, 1985 is clear that the casual labours

acquiring temporary status does not become a temporary

Railway Servant or a member of Railway Service Card

holder under Railway. Section 14(1)(A) is not attracted

to the consideration of the Tribunal.

Learned counsel for 1st party Mr. Shashi during

further course of argument submitted that 1st party

workman is covered under Seetion 2(s) of I.D. Act.

The establishment of IInd party is covered as

Industry under Section 2 (j) of the I.D. Act. That

the dispute defined under Section 2(k) covers

difference between employees employer between

employers and workman etc. The appropriate

Government is Central Government, reference is

made. The reference is tenable. The services were

terminated without notice or giving opportunity of

hearing. Therefore the termination of service of 1st

party workman is illegal. Chapter V-A of I.D. Act

dealing with retrenchment under Section 25-B of

I.D. Act provides continuous service within

meaning of clause (1) for a period of one year if

the employee worked for 240 days during

preceding 12 calendar months. 1st party workman

has not completed 240 days continuous service

therefore he is not covered as workman under

Section 25(B) of I.D. Act. For said reason, 1st

party workman is not entitled to protection under

Section 25-F clause-(a), (b) of I.D. Act. He is not

entitled to notice prior to his termination or

retrenchment compensation provided under clause

(b) of Section 25-F. That when service certificate

produced by him is found false, no notice is

required as per the condition in Exhibit M-l. For

above reasons, I record finding on Point No.1 in

Affirmative.

14. Point No. 2—In view of my finding in Point

No.1 that the termination of services of 1st party workman

is legal, the workman is not entitled to any relief prayed

by him. Accordingly I record in my finding on point No. 2.

15. In the result, award is passed as under :—

(1) Termination of 1st party workman Shri P.

Venkatswamy w.e.f. 19-4-90 by Ilnd party management is

legal.

(2) Reliefs prayed by 1st party workman Shri P.

Venkatswamy is rejected.

16. Let the copies of the award be sent to the

Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment

as per rules.

R.B. PATLE, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 12 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1662-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj d:j oS';k

cSad fy- ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds

chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] psUUkbZ ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 102@2003)

dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 12&7&2013 dks çkIr

gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y&12011@27@2002&vkbZ vkj (ch&I)º

lqefr ldykuh] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 12th July, 2013

S.O. 1662.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 102/

2003) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Chennai as shown in the Annexure, in the

Industrial Dispute between the management of Karur

Vysya, Bank Ltd., and their workmen, received by the

Central Government on 12-7-2013

[ No. L-12011/27/2002-IR(B-I)]

SUMATI SAKLANI, Section Officer.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM -LABOUR COURT,

CHENNAI

Thursday, the 25th April, 2013

PRESENT :

A.N. JANARDANAN, Presiding Officer

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No.102/2003

[In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause

(d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of

the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), between the

Management of Karur Vysya Bank and their Workman.]

4688

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

BETWEEN

1.

The General Secretary

1st Party/1st Petitioner

All Banks Appraisers Union

Federation

No.1, Kattiyakaran Street

Cuddalore-607002

2.

The General Secretary

1st Party/2nd Petitioner

Karur Vysya Bank

Union

Employees Union

5, IV Street, Sowrastra

Nagar, Choolaimedu

Chennai-600094

AND

The Chairman

2nd Party/Management

Karur Vysya Bank Ltd.

(Head Office)

Karur -639002

APPEARANCE:

For the 1st and 2nd Party/Petitioner Union

M/s. V. Ajoy Khose and S. Manogaran, Advocates

For the 2nd Party/Management

M/s. T.S. Gopalan & Co., Advocates

AWAR D

The Central Government, Ministry of Labour and

Employment vide its Order No. L-12011/27/2002-IR(B-I)

dated 29-04-2003 referred the following Industrial Dispute

to this Tribunal for adjudication.

The schedule mentioned in that order is :

“Whether the demand of the All India Bank

Appraisers Federation, Tamil Nadu to regularize the

services of Jewel Appraisers (as per annexure) is the

Karur Vysya Bank Ltd. is legal and justified? If so,

what relief the workmen are entitled to?”

2. After the receipt of Industrial Dispute, this Tribunal

has numbered it as ID 102/2003 and issued notices to both

sides. Both sides entered appearance through their

Advocates and filed their Claim, Counter and Reply

Statement subsequently filing additional Claim Statement

and Counter Statement consequent to impleadment of

second petitioner/first party in the claim petition as per

order dated 11.07.2008 in IA 19/2007 in the ID as confirmed

in the order dated 26-03-2012 in Civil Appeal No. 3292 of

2012 arising out of SLP (Civil) No. 6689 of 2007 of the

Supreme Court. A relevant extract of the order of the

Supreme Court is as follows :

“In the result, therefore, we dispose of this appeal

with the observations that the appellant-Bank shall

within two weeks from today withdraw Writ Petition

(Civil) Nos. 22658 and 22659 of 2008, in which event,

the Tribunal shall be free to proceed with the

reference already made to which the Respondent

No. 1- Bank Employees Union has already been added

as a party. In view of the withdrawal of the said writ

petitions and revival of the reference made by the

Central Government, it will be unnecessary for the

Union of India to make a second reference on the

very same questions as are pending before the

Tribunal.”

3. The common case of both the petitioners in their

separate Claim Statement and Reply Statement in a nutshell

is that the jewel appraisers of the Respondent Bank

establishment are legally and factually entitled to be

regularized for the grounds and reasons set forth in the

Claim Statement as permanent employees in the respective

branches of the Respondent Bank with all service and

monetary benefits thereto and therefore it is prayed that

the reference may be answered passing an award in favour

of petitioners directing the Respondent Management to

regularize service of the Jewel Appraisers as in the annexure

(S.No. 1 to 12) with all service monetary benefits, continuity

of service, etc. of regular employees. The Hon'ble Supreme

Court was pleased to dispose of the Civil Appeal 3292/

2012 permitting First Party Union No. 2 to agitate their

demand for regularization of Jewel Appraisers in I.D.

No.1 02/2003. Demand of First Party Union No.2 for

regularization of all Jewel Appraisers shall be made direct

permanent Clerical Staff with time scale of pay and all other

attendant benefits from the date of completion of 480 days

of service from the date of their initial appointment .

4. In the separate Counter Statement filed before

and after the impleadment of the First Party Union No. 2

what is stated in a nutshell is as follows:

The Jewel Appraisers are neither regular staff nor

can they claim regularization in the bank. As per the

judgment of the Supreme Court in IOB case there is no

scope to hold that the Jewel Appraisers engaged by the

Respondent are employed in the service of the Bank. The

claim is to be rejected.

5.

Points for consideration are :

(i)

Whether the claim of the petitioner unions/first

party to regularize the service of the Jewel

Appraisers in Karur Vysya Bank Ltd. is legal and

justified.

(ii)

To what relief the concerned workmen are entitled?

Points (i) and (ii)

6. When the matter came up for further proceedings

First Party/2nd Petitioner made an endorsement on the

Claim Statement withdrawing the dispute. First Party/1st

Petitioner did not present himself for further proceedings

in the matter. Heard both sides. Perused the records.

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4689

7. As far as it relates to the First Party/2nd Petitioner,

their claim is no longer pursued up for the relief claimed by

them for regularization in the Respondent Bank. As far as it

relates to the First Party/1st Union, they have not had

been in the scene for prosecuting their claim since a long

time. It is not established that the workmen whose cause is

espoused by the Unions are workmen under the

Respondent Bank independent of their isolated status as

Jewel Appraisers who are only independent contractors

with no employer-employee relationship interse them and

the Bank Management. They have failed in carving out an

exception to the more or less settled position that Jewel

Appraisers are generally not employees of the Bank under

which they usually function as independent contractors

in terms of specific contracts for employment reached

between them in the absence of specific proof in otherwise

particular circumstances. Therefore it is only to be held

that the claim of the petitioner unions to regularize them

and declare them entitled to consequential benefits thereof

is not legal and justified. They are therefore not entitled to

any relief.

7. The reference is answered accordingly.

(Dictated to the P.A., transcribed and typed by him,

corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this

day the 25th April, 2013).

A. N. JANARDANAN, Presiding Officer

Witnesses Examined :

For the 1st Party/Petitioner : None

For the 2nd Party/Management : None

Documents Marked :

On the petitioner's side

Ex. No. Date Description

N/A

On the Management’s side

Ex. No. Date Description

Nil

ubZ fnYyh]15 tqykbZ]2013

dk-vk- 1663-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj dukZVd cSad

fy- ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] caxykSj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 71@2008)

dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 15&7&2013 dks çkIr

gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y&12012@123@2003&vkbZ vkj (ch&I)º

lqefr ldykuh] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 15th July, 2013

S.O. 1663.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 71/2008)

of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Bangalore as shown in the Annexure, in the

Industrial dispute between the management of Karnataka

Bank Limited, and their workmen received by the Central

Government on 15-7-2013.

[ No. L-12012/123/2003-IR(B-I)]

SUMATI SAKLANI, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

BANGALORE

Dated : 7th June, 2013

Present

:

Shri S. N. Navalgund, Presiding Office

CR No. 71/2008

Sri B. V. Chandrashekar, .....I Party

No. 15/3, Model House Street,

IV Street, N. R. Colony,

Bangalore-560 004

The Chairman and Managing .....II party

Director, Karnataka Bank

Limited, HR & IR Dept., P B No.

599, H O, Com., Mahaveer Circle,

PO Kankanady,

Mangalore - 575 002.

APPEARANCES :

I Party :

Shri S.T. Satheesh Naik,

Advocate

II Party :

Shri Ramesh Upadhyaya,

Advocate

AWARD

1.

The Central Government vide order No. L-12012/

123/2003- IR(B-I) dated 15.09.2008 in exercise of the power

conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section

(2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

(14 of 1947) made this reference for adjudication with the

following schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of Karnataka

Bank Ltd., in removing the petitioner, Shri B.V.

Chandrashekar, Special Assistant· from service, is

justified? If not to what relief he is entitled?”

4690

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2. On receipt of the reference registering it in C R 71/

2008 when notices were issued to both the sides they

entered their appearances through their respective

advocates and I party filed his claim statement on

29-07-2010 and II Party its counter statement on

16-11-2010.

3. The I party in his claim statement claims that he

joined the service as Clerk with the II Party at its Bangalore

Chickpet Branch and while he was working at its Bangalore

City Market Branch received Office Order dated 23-07-1998

posting him as Special Assistant to Ajampur, Shimoga

Branch and being aggrieved by the said order in the middle

of the academic session he gave a representation dated

28-07-1998 with a prayer to modify the said order and to

accommodate him in anyone of the branches in and around

Bangalore City and as the same was neither considered

nor rejected he joined the Ajampur Branch on 10-10-1998

as he was threatened with dire consequences of removal

from service if he files appeal seeking modification of transfer

order. It is further contended that in the meanwhile the II

Party which was bent upon to get rid of his services on one

or the other pretext under the pretext that his request for

modification of orders will be considered favourably

obtaining his signatures on blank papers created VRS letter

dated 28-09-1998. It is further contended before the actual

date of its acceptance he gave voluminous representation

seeking continuation of his services but to his shock a

letter dated 20-11-1998 was received by him communicating

that his VRS letter dated 28-09-1998 is accepted and he will

be relieved of his duties from 01-04-1999. Being aggrieved

by the said letter he raised an industrial dispute and after

elaborate deliberations it ended in failure through failure

report dated 04-03-2003 and as no action was taken on the

said failure report by the Ministry of Labour he filed a Writ

Petition before the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in W P

No. 36852/2003 wherein the Hon’ble High Court by order

dated 08-03-2007 directed the Ministry to consider the

failure report and refer the matter for industrial adjudication

if warranted, the Central Government made this reference

for adjudication. It is further contended under the threat of

removal from services and using force, giving tension a

letter dated 28-09-1998 was obtained from him as if he seeks

voluntary retirement from services and that at the

intervention of elders and well wishers he gave a

representation dated 28-09-1998 seeking permission to

withdraw the alleged voluntary retirement from services

under letter dated 28-09-1998 but without giving any reply

to the said representation an order dated 28-11-1998 was

served on him communicating that his VRS is accepted

and he will be relieved from services w.e.f. 01-04-1999 and

as he has every right to withdraw the VRS letter before its

actual acceptance the action of the II Party is an act of

deprivation of his livelihood amounting to termination from

services practising of unfair labour practice under Section

2(ra) of I.D. Act 1947. With these averments it is prayed for

direction to the II Party to reinstate him into his original

post granting him all the consequential benefits like

reinstatement, full backwages, promotion etc., as if there

was no order for removal from services. The II party in its

Counter Statement filed on 16-05-2011 without disputing

that the I party joined the services as Clerk at its Bangalore

Chickpet branch on 06-05-1978 contended that while he

was working at its Bangalore City Market Branch in the

year 1998 after taking his willingness letter entrusted of

duties/promoted as Special Assistant and transferred to

Ajampura Branch of Shimoga Region by order dated

23-07-1998 and on receipt of the said order he requested

for modification of his transfer to his places of choice and

as same was not acceeded to, he got relieved from Bangalore

City Market Branch on 08-10-1998 and reported to Ajampur

Branch on 10-10-1998 and in the meanwhile he submitted a

letter dated 28-09-1998 seeking voluntary retirement and

considering the same favourably the acceptance of his

voluntary retirement was communicated to him by letter

dated 20-11-1998 that he will be retired on 01-04-1999 as

requested by him and there after the I Party through his

letter dated 14-11-1998 and 02-12-1998 requested to transfer

him to any one of the branches in Bangalore and as the

same was not acceded to he had written a letter dated

26-11-1998 thanking the management for having accepted

his letter for voluntary retirement and for having permitted

him to clear his loan liabilities as desired by him. It is further

contended though the II party wanted to relieve the I Party

prior to 01-04-1999 on his request the effective date for

voluntary retirement was fixed to 01-04-1999 to clear the

outstanding loans and that by his letter dated 01-03-1999

his request to postpone the date of relieving from

01-04-1999 to 10-05-1999 was rejected he filed suit in O S

65/1999 on the file of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Tarikere

seeking declaration of his voluntary retirement as null and

void and for permanent injunction from relieving him from

services w.e.f. 01-04-1999 and obtained an exparte order of

status-quo in the said suit on 31-03-1999 and due to that

order he could not be relieved from services w.e.f.

01-04-1999 and as the Hon'ble Court vacated the exparte

interim order on 17-04-1999 he stood relieved w.e.f.

01-04-1999. The II party further denying the allegations

that the voluntary retirement was created obtaining his

signature under the pretext that his request for modification

of his transfer order will be favourably considered or under

threat or coercion, it is contended that a valid order of

acceptance of the voluntary retirement fixing date of

relieving on 01-04-1999 was being passed on a specific

request he has come up with false allegations, it is prayed

to reject the reference.

4. At the outset, it has to be said that the term used

in the schedule of reference “removing the petitioner”

appears to be used loosely or inadvertently as it is nobodies

case that he is removed from service on any charge as

such it ought to have been “relieving the petitioner”.

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4691

5. After completion of the pleadings when the II

Party was called upon to adduce evidence justifying its

action its learned advocate while filing the affidavit of B

Dinesh Bhat, Senior manager, HR & IR Department

reiterating the counter statement examining him on oath as

MW 1 got exhibited Office copies of the appointment letter

relating to I party dated 27-03-1978;Memorandum dated

10-07-1984, 09,.09-1989, 04-05-1994 (04-05-1004) relating to

transfer of I Party; Original letter of I party dated

24-06-1998; Office copy of reply dated 17.08.1998; office

copy of the relieving certificate; original letters received

from I party dated 10-10-1998, 28-09-1998, 14-11-1998, 02-

12-1998 requesting for acceptance of his Voluntary

Retirement; copies of plaintiff IA in O S 65/1999 on the file

of Civil Judge (Jr. Div.)Tarikere & copy of order dated

17-04-1999 in the said suit; original letter from I party dated

26-12-1998 for accommodating him at Bangalore; Office

copy of letter dated 10-03-1999 intimating the party about

confirming date of his Voluntary Retirement being w.e.f. 01-

04-1999; original letter received from the I party dated 01-

03-1999 requesting him to relieve him on 10-05-1999 instead

of 01-04-1999; office copy of letter dated 20-04-1999

addressed to I Party relating to settlement of his PF, Gratuity

and Pension Two original receipt dated 14-08-1999 passed

by I party having received Rs. 95,596 and Rs. 1,42,404 as Ex

M-1 to Ex M-19 respectively and by filing the affidavit of H

S Sanjeev, Branch Manager, Ajampur Branch during 1996

to 1999 examined him on oath as MW 2 to confirm the two

letters received by him from the I Party dated

14-11-1998 and 02-12-1998 which were exhibited as Ex M-

10 and Ex M-11 in the evidence of MW 1. Interalia, the

learned advocate appearing for the I Party reiterating the

claim statement while filing the affidavit of I Party examining

him on oath as WW 1 got exhibited Copy of the

Representation given by him for Voluntary Retirement dated

28-07-1998; Letter of the II Party dated 20-11-1998 for having

'accepted his Voluntary Resignation; certified copy of the

order in W P No. 36852/2003 dated 08-03-2007 issuing

direction to the Ministry of Labour to consider the FOC

report and pass appropriate order; copy of the

representation purported to have been given by him for

cancellation of Voluntary Retirement letter submitted by

him to the Deputy General Manager as Ex W-2 to Ex W-5

respectively and in the cross-examination of MW 1 he had

got exhibited the transfer order served on the I party dated

23-07-1998 as Ex W-1.

6.

After close of the evidence of both the sides when

the matter was posted for arguments, learned advocate

appearing for the I party filed his written arguments on

27-02-2013 and today when the learned advocate appearing

for the II party addressed his arguments, the learned

advocate appearing for the I party gave his reply with a

request to pass Award expeditiously since the

superannuation age of the I Party is fast approaching.

7. On appreciation of the pleadings, Oral and

Documentary evidence brought on record by both the sides

in the light of the arguments put forward by the learned

advocates, I have arrived at conclusion of Rejecting the

Reference holding that the action of the management of

KBL in relieving the petitioner Sh. B. V. Chandrashekar,

Special Assistant from service w.e.f. 01-04-1999 pursuant

to his request through letter dated 28-09-1998 is legal and

justified for the following reasons :

REASONS

8. The claim of the I Party that the letter of Voluntary

Retirement purported to have been given by him dated

28-09-1998 exhibited as Ex M-9 is a creation obtaining his

signatures under the pretext that his request for

modification of order of transfer will be considered

favourable and under threat duress and coercion is a

convenient plea put forward by him without any

corroboration to overcome some how the letter of

resignation voluntarily submitted by him with a specific

request to relieve him w.e.f. 01-04-1999 enabling him to

participate in the Platinum Jubilee Deposit Mobilization

contest 1998- 1999 and to achieve the desired results. As

contended by the II party, I party in his two letters written

to the II party subsequent to the impugned letter of

voluntary retirement dated 14-11-1998 and 02-12-1998 which

are marked as Ex M-10 and Ex M-11 without whispering his

desire to withdraw his lefter of voluntary retirement he

having requested to extend the date of relieving him to

10-05-1999 from 01-04-1999 and further strengthened it by

his own suit filed in O S No. 65/1999 on the file of Civil

Judge (Junior Division), Tarikere wherein he challenged

the order of II Party rejecting his request to postpone the

date of relieving him to 10-05-1999 from 01-04-1999. In the

above suit filed by the I Party on 27-03-1999 he filed an

interim application under Order 39 Rule 2 read with section

151 of CPC supported by his own affidavit for issue of

temporary injunction restraining the defendants to relieve

him w.e.f. 01-04-1999 and in Para 2 of the affidavit filed in

support of the said Interim Application he states that he

has challenged the order of the defendants to relieve him

from the services w.e.f. 01-04-1999 after office. hours instead

of 10.05.1999 and obtained an exparte order of injunction

and admittedly that exparte interim order came to be vacated

on 17-04-1999, if at all the voluntary retirement letter dated

28-09-1998 was obtained from him under the pretext that

his request for change of place of transfer would be

favourably considered or under threat or coercion as alleged

by him he would have definitely stated so in his application

filed for interim injunction or if he had withdrawn or given

a letter for cancellation as now claimed he would have

mentioned that aspect also in the said suit. Therefore, this

theory that the letter of voluntary retirement was obtained

under threat, coercion or pretext of considering his request

for change of place is after thought some how to get over

his own folly/err committed in submitting the voluntary

retirement letter dated 28-09-1998. As far as the theory tried

to be put forward that he also submitted a letter for

4692

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

withdrawal or cancellation of the letter of resignation by

his letter dated 29-09-1998 appears to be a make believe

story to some how fit in his case to the facts of the decision

cited by him of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the

case of Shambu Murari Sinha vs. Project and Development

India Ltd. And anr. reported in 2002 RD SC 131 wherein it is

held Employee withdrawing application for voluntary

retirement before effective date being valid. It is pertinent

to note that though it is denied by the II party such a letter

of withdrawing' the resignation letter dated 29-09-1998 being

given, he just rest contended by producing a letter

purported to have been sent by him for cancellation of

voluntary retirement and getting it exhibited as Ex W-5

without producing any evidence having either forwarded

it through post or presenting it in person to any of the

responsible officials of the II party. Added to this in the

cross-examination of MW 1 his learned advocate has made

a suggestion to him that even this letter dated 29-09-1998

got marked as ex W-5 being obtained by the II Party for

cancellation of the VRS from Service. Thereby even the

case tried to be made out for the I Party that he withdrew or

requested for cancellation of his letter of voluntary

retirement before the date of its acceptance or date fixed

for relieving him is just a story created ingeniously to some

how get over from the effect of accepting the voluntary

retirement letter submitted by him. Under these

circumstances in the absence of the I Party failing to prove

or demonstrate that the impugned letter of voluntary

retirement dated 28-09-1998 was an outcome of signatures

obtained from him on blank papers under the pretext that

his request for change of place would be favourably

considered or either under threat or coercion and also to

prove that he gave letter of withdrawing the letter of

resignation as claimed by him as per Ex. W-5 absolutely I

find no reasons to say that the action of the management

in relieving him from service w.e.f. 01-04-1999 being not

justified. In the result, I arrive at conclusion of rejecting the

reference holding that the action of the management of

KBL in relieving the petitioner. Sh. B V Chandrashekar,

Special Assistant, w.e.f. 01-04-1999 is justifiedand that he

is not entitle for any relief and pass the following order :

ORDER

The Reference is Rejected holding that the action of

the management of Karnataka Bank Limited in removing

the petitioner, Shri B V Chandrashekar, Special Assistant

from service is legal and justified and that he is not entitle

for any relief. No order to cost.

(Dictated to U.D.C., transcribed by him, corrected

and signed by me on 7th June, 2013).

S. N. NAVALGUND, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 16 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1664-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj Hkkjrh; LVsV

cSad ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky; eqEcbZ ua- 1 ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 3@2006)

dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 12&7&2013 dks çkIr

gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y&12012@117@2005&vkbZvkj (ch&1)º

lqefr ldykuh] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the16th July, 2013

S.O. 1664.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 3/2006)

of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum -Labour

Court, No. 1, Mumbai as shown in the Annexure, in the

Industrial Dispute between the management of State Bank

of India and their workmen, received by the Central

Government on 12-7-2013.

[ No. L-12012/117/2005-IR (B-I)]

SUMATI SAKLANI, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL No. 1, MUMBAI

Present

JUSTICE G. S. SARRAF, Presiding Officer

REFERENCE No. : CGIT-1/3 OF 2006

Parties: Employers in relation to the management of

State Bank of India

And

Their workman (Ramesh Bhivaji Kamble)

Appearances:

For the Management

:

Mr. Nadkarni, Adv.

For the Union

:

Mr. Umesh Nabar, Adv.

State

:

Maharashtra

Mumbai, dated the 5th day of June, 2013.

AWARD PART-I

This is a reference made by the Central Government

in exercise of its powers under clause (d) of sub- section

(1) and sub-section (2-A) of Section 10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act 1947. The terms of reference given in the

schedule are as follows:

Whether the management of SBI has followed the

norms of justice, in discharging the services of the

workman? If not, to what relief is the workman entitled

to?

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4693

According to the statement of claim filed by State

Bank of India Staff Union (hereinafter referred to as the

Union) Ramesh Bhivaji Kamble joined the services of the

State Bank of India (hereinafter referred to as the Bank) as

Cashier-cum-Clerk w.e.f. 31.1.1979. The workman was then

designated as Head Assistant w.e.f. 12.6.1982. The workman

was having clean and unblemished service record of more

than seventeen years till he was subjected to disciplinary

action vide chargesheet dt.13.7.1996. The family of the

workman consisted of aged parents, six sisters, wife and

four children and he was the only earning member in the

family. The father of the workman borrowed heavy amounts

from private money lenders for performing marriages of the

sisters of the workman without the knowledge of the

workman. The workman was under legal and moral

obligations to secure loans advanced to his father because

the entire amount could not be repaid in time and by way of

security the workman was required to issue cheques which

were not to be used for realisation and, therefore, it was

not necessary to keep sufficient balance in the account.

The father of the workman repaid the entire amount after

selling the ancestral property. As regards withdrawal from

account No. NRE/4111 the account holder was known to

the workman and as such cash was handed over to the

bearer of the withdrawal slip. The suit filed against him was

withdrawn after satisfaction of the claim in the suit. During

the pendency of the enquiry proceedings the workman

was not suspended. The workman cleared all his liabilities

and no claim was pending against him. However, the Bank

did not apply its mind before issuing the chargesheet and,

therefore, the chargesheet is legally improper and bad in

law. The disciplinary proceedings were not fair in asmuchas

the Bank did not lead any evidence in support of the

allegations levelled against the workman. The copy of

enquiry proceedings was not made available to the

workman till a copy of enquiry report was furnished to the

workman for submitting his comments. Thus the

proceedings conducted against the workman are in

violation of the principles of natural justice. The Enquiry

Officer found the workman guilty of the charges nos.1, 2, 3

and 6 and exonerated him from the charges nos. 4, 5 and 7.

The findings of the Enquiry Officer holding the workman

guilty of charges nos. 1, 2, 3 and 6 are perverse and are

liable to be set aside. The enquiry held against the workman

was not fair. The Disciplinary Authority did not look into

the contentions of the workman before passing the order

of punishment of discharge from service and as such the

order of punishment is wholly perverse. The workman filed

an appeal which was dismissed by the Appellate Authority

without dealing with the contentions raised on behalf of

the workman. The Union has, therefore, prayed that the

Bank be directed to reinstate the workman to his original

post w.e.f.13.9.2003 with full back wages, continuity of

service and all consequential benefits.

According to the written statement filed by the Bank

the workman was working as Head Clerk in Killari branch.

He committed several irregularities such as resorting to

heavy outside borrowings without obtaining prior approval

of controllers, issuing cheques for large amounts without

obtaining/maintaining sufficient balance in his savings

bank accounts, misappropriating funds from the account

of the customer and manipulating transactions in depositors

account for his own benefit. All these acts amounted to

gross misconduct under the Shastry Award and subsequent

Bipartite Settlements. Several complaints against the

workman were received. A complaint was filed against the

workman under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments

Act and that complaint was withdrawn after payment of

the amount. The workman was issued chargesheet for the

followings acts of misconduct.

(i)

Resorting to heavy outside borrowing without

obtaining prior approval of controllers.

(ii)

Issuing cheques for large amounts without

maintaining sufficient balance in his savings bank

account, resulting in the said cheques being

returned unpaid when presented for payment.

(iii)

Misappropriating funds from the Account

No.NRE/4111 of Shri Vijaykumar C.Dombale and

utilizing the same for personal use.

(iv)

Manipulating transactions from some depositors

account in a malafide manner. For example

unauthorisedly withdrawing Rs.10,000 on 21st

May 1993 from SB Account No.A/9/1590 of Shri

Subhash Nile and crediting the amount by transfer

entry to Account No.P12/1590 of Shri Jagdale and

Account No.P/13/4612 of Shri R.D.Suryavanshi

and allowing withdrawal of Rs.4,000 from the

aforesaid account of Shri Suryavanshi even

though the balance in the account was only

Rs.304.85.

(v)

Negligently allowing of Rs. 5,000 from the

Account No.NRE/4111 on 2nd July 1993 without

verifying the specimen signature of the account

holder i.e. the withdrawal was signed in English

whereas the specimen signature of the account

holder on record was in Marathi.

(vi)

Several complaints being received from

the

constituents of the branch on account of above

acts as also a complaint being filed against him in

the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class at Ausa

under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.

(vii)

Seriously jeopardizing the interest of the Bank

and loss of faith of the constituents on account

of the aforesaid acts.

Initially S.B.Saraf, Chief Manager of Nanded branch

of the Bank was appointed as Enquiry Officer and

4694

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

consequent to his transfer C.H.Gaushal, Chief Manager,

Killari branch of the Bank was appointed as Enquiry Officer.

It was noticed that the workman was working at Killari

branch under Gaushal, therefore, to have a unbiased and

fair enquiry, V.Y.Potdar, Manager, Udgir branch of the Bank

was appointed as Enquiry Officer in place of Gaushal. The

workman was duly represented by his defence

representative V.W.Patil. The Enquiry Officer conducted

the enquiry in accordance with the principles of natural

justice and gave full and fair opportunity to the workman

to defend himself. The Enquiry Officer vide report

dt.30.11.1998 found the workman guilty of charges nos.1,2,3

and 6. A copy of the enquiry report was sent to the workman

vide letter dt.7.6.1999. The workman made his submission

vide letter dt.6.7.1999. After considering the enquiry report

and the submissions made by the workman the Disciplinary

Authority proposed the punishment of discharge with

superannuation benefits as would otherwise be due to the

workman at that stage and without disqualification from

future employment. Show cause notice was then given to

the workman. During the personal hearing the workman

pleaded for sympathetic view of the matter and modification

of the penalty. After carefully considering all the aspects

of the matter the Disciplinary Authority passed his final

order on 13.9.2003 and imposed the punishment as

proposed. The Appellate Authority rejected the appeal of

the workman vide order dt.19.1.2004. According to the

written statement the Bank conducted legal, fair and proper

enquiry. The Bank, has, therefore, prayed that the reference

be rejected.

The Union has filed rejoinder wherein it has reiterated

its stand.

Following Issues have been framed as per order

sheet dt.14.3.2011.

(i)

Whether the enquiry held against the workman is

fair and proper?

(ii)

Whether the findings of the Enquiry Officer are

perverse?

(iii)

Whether the punishment given to the workman is

shockingly disproportionate?

(iv)

What relief?

The Union has filed affidavit of the workman Ramesh

Bhivaji Kamble and he has been cross-examined by learned

counsel for the Bank. The Bank has filed affidavit of Vijay

Potdar and he has been cross-examined by learned counsel

for the Union.

Heard Shri Nabar on behalf of the Union and Shri

Nadkarni on behalf of the Bank.

Issues nos. (i) and (ii): Principles of natural justice

are not embodied rules. It cannot be put in a straightjacket

formula. It depends upon the facts and circumstance of

each case. However, to sustain the allegation of violation

of principles of natural justice one must establish that

prejudice has been caused to the workman for non-

observance of principles of natural justice.

The workman has stated in his cross-examination as

under:

This is correct that the Bank held an enquiry against

me in respect of the chargesheet dt.13.7.1996. This is

correct that I fully participated in the enquiry. I

appointed defence nominee of my choice. Whatever

transpired it was correctly recorded in the order

sheets of the enquiry. I and my defence nominee

would sign every order sheet. If my defence nominee

was not present on account of some reason the

Enquiry Officer would adjourn the matter. Whatever

documents Bank submitted in the enquiry, copies of

those documents were given to me. I also had full

opportunity to submit document in my defence and

accordingly I submitted. Ex.M-09 (page 6 to 12) are

the enquiry proceedings. I was given a copy of the

enquiry report and I filed an appeal. I was given

personal hearing in the appeal. This is correct that I

submitted reply of the chargesheet.

It is amply clear from the statement of the workman himself

that no prejudice has been caused to him. As such there is

no violation of any principle of natural justice.

This is correct that the Bank has not led any oral

evidence before the Enquiry Officer. But there was no

occasion for the Bank to bring oral evidence to prove the

documents as the genuineness of the documents relied by

the Bank was not challenged by the workman. If the

allegations in the enquiry are such which can be proved by

the documents then it is not obligatory for the Bank to

bring oral evidence. In this case the genuineness of the

documents has not been denied by the workman and,

therefore, the Union cannot complain that no witness has

come forward to prove the documents.

From the above discussion it is clear that the enquiry

held against the workman is fair and proper and the findings

of the Enquiry Officer cannot be said to be perverse.

Issues nos.(i} and (ii) are, therefore, decided in favour

of the Bank and against the workman.

Award Part-I is passed accordingly.

JUSTICE G. S. SARRAF, Presiding Officer

ANNEXURE-II

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 1, MUMBAI

PRESENT :

JUSTICE G. S. Sarraf, Presiding Officer

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4695

REFERENCE No. : CGIT-1/3 OF 2006

Parties: Employers in relation to the management of

State Bank of India

And

Their workman (Ramesh Bhivaji Kamble)

Appearances:

For the Management

:

Mr. Nadkarni, Adv.

For the Union

:

Mr. Umesh Nabar, Adv.

State

:

Maharashtra

Mumbai, dated the 18th day of June, 2013

AWARD PART-II

This is a reference made by the Central Government

in exercise of its powers under clause (d) of sub section (1)

and sub-section (2-A) of Section 10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act 1947. The terms of reference given in the

schedule are as follows:

Whether the management of SBI has followed the

norms of justice, in discharging the services of the

workman? If not, to what relief is the workman

entitled to?

It is not necessary to narrate the facts here as the

facts have been stated in detail in the Award Part-I dt.

5-6-2913 passed by this Tribunal.

(i)

Whether the enquiry held against the workman is

fair and proper?

(ii)

Whether the findings of the Enquiry Officer are

perverse?

(iii)

Whether the punishment given to the workman is

shockingly disproportionate?

(iv)

What relief?

Issues nos.(i) and (ii) have been decided in favour of

the Bank and against the workman. Thereafter the workman

has filed his affidavit and he has been cross examined by

learned counsel for the Bank. The Bank has not led any

evidence.

Heard Mr. Nabar learned counsel for the workman

and Mr.Nadkarni learned counsel for the Bank.

Issue no. (III) : The workman was found guilty of

excessive borrowings and misappropriation. The

Disciplinary Authority awarded the punishment of

discharge with superannuation benefits as would otherwise

be due to the workman at that stage and without

disqualification from future employment.

Once there has been an enquiry in accordance with

principles of natural justice and the findings recorded at

that enquiry are not frowned upon then this Tribunal should

not interfere with the quantum of punishment unless the

punishment is shown to be vitiated by malafides. This

certainly is not the position in the present case.

The Banking business requires absolute devotion,

integrity and honesty and if this is not there surely the

confidence of the public/depositors will be impaired. In

such a case there should be no place for generosity or

sympathy.

The fact that the workman was not suspended during

the pendency of the enquiry proceedings and the fact that

there is a long interval between the submission of the

enquiry report and the order of punishment passed against

the workman are of no help to the workman while

considering whether the punishment is shockingly

disproportionate.

Considering all the facts and circumstances of the

matter. I do not think that the punishment imposed against

the workman is shockingly disproportionate to the charges

proved against him so as to warrant interference by this

Tribunal.

Issue no. (iii) is decided against the workman.

Issue no. (iv): The workman is not entitled to any

relief.

Award Part-II is passed accordingly.

JUSTICE G. S. SARRAF, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 16 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1665-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj Hkkjrh; LVsV

cSad ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 105@2003)

dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 16&7&2013 dks çkIr

gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y&12012@477@2001&vkbZvkj (ch&I)º

lqefr ldykuh] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the16th July, 2013

S.O. 1665.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 105/

2003) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in the

Industrial Dispute between the management of State Bank

of India and their workmen, received by the Central

Government on 16-7-2013.

[No. L-12012/477/2001-IR (B-I)]

SUMATI SAKLANI, Section Officer

4696

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR

COURT, JABALPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/R/l05/2003

Presiding Officer : SHRI R. B. PATLE

The General Secretary,

Daily Wages Bank Employees Association,.

9, Sanwer Road,

Ujjain

. . .Workman/Union

Versus

The Asstt. General Manager,

State Bank of India,

Zonal Office, Hamidia Road,

Bhopal (MP)

. . .Management

AWARD

Passed on this 17th day of June, 2013

1. As per letter dated 14-2-2003 by the Government

of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is

received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under

Section-10 of I.D. Act, 1947 as per Notification No. L-12012/

477/2001-IR (B-I). The dispute udner reference relates to :

‘‘Whether the action of the management of Asstt.

General Manager, State Bank of India, Bhopal in

terminating the services of Shri Sanjay Jawkhedkar

w.e.f. 11-12-1998 instead of regularizing him is

justified? If not, what relief the workman is entitled?"

2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to

the parties. Ist party workman submitted statement of claim

at Page 2/2 to 2/5. The case of 1st party workman is that he

was working on vacant post of messenger from 11-2-1991.

He rendered his services satisfactorily. He was working

for 8 hours. That Head Office had issued circular for

absorbing casual daily wage employees. That his services

were terminated from 11-12-98. He claims that he had

completed 240 days continuous service since. initial

appointment. That he was forcibly handed over cheque of

Rs. 5760. He was also paid bonus Rs. 3604 That he had

worked for total 1890 days. That his services were

terminated without displaying list of retrenched employees.

The termination is in violation of Section 25-G, F & N of

I.D.Act. Ist party prays for his reinstatement with

consequential benefits.

3. IInd party filed Written Statement at Page 1111 to

11/14. Objection is taken that Ram Nagwanshi, General

Secretary of the Union was terminated from service of the

Bank. He cannot be present for workman. That workman

was employed purely on daily wages as Messenger. In

1985, he worked for 76 days, in 1986 for 70 days, during

period 1993 to 1998 he worked for 1316 days at Indore

Main Branch as daily wager. That Ist party was

discontinued after payment of wages on account of notice

and retrenchment compensation amount Rs. 5760 was paid.

The IInd party further submits that as per under in

conciliation proceeding bonus Rs. 3604 was paid. The 1st

party workman was engaged on contract basis as per

exigency of work. His discontinuance is covered under

Section 2(oo) of I.D. Act.

4. IInd party further submits that workman has

not completed 240 days service during any of the

calendar years. He is not covered as workman under

Section 25(B) of I.D. Act. That as per settlement dated.

17-11-87, a temporary employee in subordinate cadre

were given chance of being considered for appointment

in the Bank. Those who completed. 240 days temporary

service during 12 months or less after 1975, those who

have completed 270 days aggregate temporary service

in any continuous block of 36 calendar months after

1-7-75, those who have completed minimum of 30 days

aggregate temporary service in any calendar year after

1975 or a minimum of 70 days aggregate temporary

service in any continuous block of 36 months after

1-7-75. The details of the settlements are given in

Para-5. The settlement was extended time to time on

27-10-88, 9-1-91, 30-1-96. The settlement was last

extended till 31-3-97. IInd party submits that workman

has submitted application. He was called for interview

on 23-1-90. He could not be given permanent

employment as his name was much below in Waiting

List. Ist party did not submit his application to the

Bank. Therefore name of Ist party was not considered

for employment in the Bank. Ist party was engaged

purely on daily wage basis during 1993 to 1998 as per

exigency. He could not be regularized being casual

employee. Rest of the contention of workman are

denied. It is submitted that workman had not completed

240 days service in one calendar year. He was not

appointed against available vacant post. Ist party

workman had worked for 1360 days form 1993 to 1998.

It is denied that termination of service of Ist party is in

violation of Section 25-F,G & N of I.D. Act. IInd party

prayed for rejection of reliefs prayed by workman.

5. Considering pleadings on record, the points which

arise for my consideration and determination are as under.

My findings are recorded against each of them for the

reasons as below :—

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4697

“(i) Whether the action of the

management of Asstt.

In Negative

General Manager, State Bank

of India, Bhopal in termi-

nating the services of

Shri Sanjay Jawkhedkar

w.e.f. 11-12-1998 instead of

regularizing him is legal?

(ii) If so, to what relief the

As per order

workman is entitled to?”

REASONS

6. The dispute under reference relates to whether the

action of the IInd party management in terminating his

services instead of regularizing him is legal? From pleadings

between parties, there is no dispute that workman was

working for 146 days from 10-7-85 till 1986. He had worked

for 146 days. Thereafter Ist party workman was engaged

from 1991 and his services were terminated on 11-12-98.

The IInd party management in his Written Statement has

admitted, that Ist party workman was called for interview

on 31-1-90, his name was in the Waiting List much below

he could not be given permanent employment.

7. The workman filed affidavit of his evidence on

19-12-2010 but did not enter in witness box for cross-

examination on behalf of Ilnd party. The ordersheet dated

29-12-12 finds clear observation that workman filed evidence

but he submitted that he doesnot want to produce witness

for cross-examination. As such his evidence is not to be

looked into in the case. The evidence of workman was

closed. Thus evidence of workman cannot be read on

evidence in case.

8. However the documents produced by workman

are admitted by the management. Exhibit W-1 is copy of

reference order, W-2 is letter dated 27-1-94 by Asstt. General

Manager to Branch Manager, Bhopal. The said letter is

clear that casual employees could be engaged on temporary

basis where it is absolutely necessary. The Waiting List

was available in the Regional Office. Suitable action could

be done considering the names and address of the

candidates in Waiting List. That there was no satisfied

time in which the candidates in Waiting List can have

employed. In para-2, it is made clear that the candidates in

Waiting List in different categories were to be appointed.

Exhibit W-3 is the copy of cheque of Rs. 3604 in name of

workman. Exhibit W-4 is letter given by Dy.General Manager

finds clear reference that workman Jawkhedkar was daily

wage employee. He was engaged as per availability of work

on daily wages. Exhibit W-5 is copy of cheque of Rs. 5716

in name of workman. Exhibit W-6 is copy of cheque of

Rs. 3604.

9. Witness of IInd party Dilip Mogre filed affidavit of

his evidence. He has stated that during 93 to 98 workman

had worked for 1316 days. However its details are not shown

in his affidavit. In para-3 of his affidavit, the witness has

stated that workman has not completed 240 days

continuous service during any calendar year. In para-6 of

his affidavit, he has stated that on 23-1-90, workman was

interviewed. His name was included in the list considering

the length of his service as casual employee. The list is not

produced by Ilnd party. It is not known why services of

workman were not regularized. The order of termination of

services of workman Exhibit W-5 finds reasons for

retrenchment that they there are no approved branches

available, your services stands terminated with immediate

effect. The IInd party has not produced the Waiting List in

which the name of workman was included. No document

about filling of vacancies from time to time by Ilnd party

are produced. The order Exhibit W-5 finds payment of

retrenchment compensation Rs. 4320 and one month's pay

Rs. 1440. However the list of retrenched employees is not

displayed, no documents are produced in that regard by

the IInd party.

10.Section 25-F of I.D. Act 1947 provides—

" No workman employed in any industry who has

been in continuous service for not less than one

year under an employer shall be retrenched by

that employer until—

(a) The workman has been given one month's notice

in writing indicating the reasons for retrenchment

and the period of notice has expire, or the workmen

has been paid in lieu of such notice, wages for the

period of the notice,

(b) The workman has been paid at the time of

retrenchment compensation which shall be equivalent

to fifteen days average pay for every completed year

of continuous service or any part thereof in excess

of six months and,

(c) Notice in the prescribed manner is served on the

appropriate Government or such authority as may

be specified by the appropriate Government by

notification in the Official Gazette."

Secion 25-G provides-

“Where any workman in an industrial establishment,

who is a citizen of India, is to be retrenched and he

belongs to a particular category of workmen in that

establishment, in the absence of any agreement

between the employer and the workman in this behalf,

the employer shall ordinarily retrench the workman

who was the last person to be employed in that

category, unless for reasons to be recorded the

employer retrenches any other workman.”

11. Thus there is no evidence about compliance of

Section 25-G When approved branches were not available,

why the services of 1st party workman alone was

terminated. Seniority list of employees was not produced

4698

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

even Waiting List was not produced by the IInd party. The

evidence on record is clear that workman was interviewed

in 1990. He was selected for regularization, his name was

included in the Waiting List. The said list is not produced.

The principle of last come Ist go was not followed. The

Union Representative Mr. Ram Nagwanshi relies on ratio

held in—

“Case of Samishta Dube and City Board Etawah and

another reported in 1999(81 )FLR 746. Their Lordship

held in absence of any agreement between the

employer and the workmen in behalf the employer

shall ordinarily retrench the workman who was last

person to be employed in that category, unless for

reasons to be recorded, the employer retrenches any

other person.”

In case of Regional Manager, SVI versus Rakesh

Kumar Tewari reported in 2006( 108)FLR 733 . Their Lordship

held provisions of Section 25-G , H doesnot require

continuation employment of workman within the meaning

of Section 25 (B) of I.D. Act.

In case of Jaipur Development Authority Versus

Ramsahai and another in 2007-1 Supreme Court Cases (L&S)

518. Their Lordship held Section 25-G is not imperative in

nature for reasons to be recorded, the employer may retrench

a workman other tha as required by the Last come first go

principle. That applicability of Section 25-G and 25-H of

I.D.Act, requirement of continuous work in terms of Section

25(8) is not a requirement.

12. IInd party 'management has not produced Waiting

List, no documents are produced as to how many candidates

in Waiting List were given opportunity. How many

vacancies were filled and why Ist party workman was not

regularized in service after his name appeared in the

Selection List. The action of the management instead of

regularizing his services terminating the services of Ist party

workman is illegal. For above reasons, .I record my finding

in Point No.1 in Negative.

13. Point No. 2—The question is what relief workman

is entitled. The workman has not entered in witness box for

his cross-examination. The services of Ist party workman

were terminated in 1998. He had continuously worked from

1993 to 1998. He was selected after, absorption in regular

staff as per the settlement. He was not given appointment

order for long period. Considering above aspects, 1st party

workman deserves to be regularized in service on vacant

post as per Waiting List prepared by management of IInd

party. As workman not made available for cross-

examination, his evidence cannot be accepted. He cannot

be allowed backwages.

14. In the result award is passed as under:-

1. The action of the management. of Asstt. General

Manager, State Bank of India, Bhopal in terminating the

services of Shri Sanjay Jawkhedkar w.e.f. 11-12-1998 instead

of regularizing him is illegal.

2. IInd party management is directed to reinstate

workman and regularize his services as per the Waiting

List prepared after interview held on 23-1-90. He is not

entitled to back wages.

15. Let the copies of the award be sent to the

Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment

as per rules.

R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 16 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1666-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj jsy fodkl

fuxe fy- ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds

chp vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] Hkqous'oj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 70@2012)

dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 16&7&2013 dks çkIr

gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y&41011@17@2009&vkbZvkj (ch&I)º

lqefr ldykuh] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the16th July, 2013

S.O. 1666.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 70/

2012) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum-

Labour Court, Bhubaneswar as shown in the Annexure, in

the Industrial Dispute between the management of Rail

Vikash Nigam Ltd., and their workmen, received by the

Central Government on 16-7-2013.

[No. L-41011/17/2009-IR (B-I)]

SUMATI SAKLANI, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL

TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

BHUBANESWAR

Present :

Shri J. Srivastava,

Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-cum-Labour

Court, Bhubaneswar.

I.D. CASE No. 70/2012

Date of Passing Order - 13th June, 2013

Between :

1. The Managing Director,

HCIL-AD HIKARYYA-ARSS (HAA) (JV)

HIG-46, BDA Enclave, G.M. Marg, Jayadev Vihar,

Bhubaneswar (Orissa) -751 013.

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4699

2. The Chief Project Manager, Rail Vikash

Nigam Ltd., Metro Tower, Vani Vihar,

Bhubaneswar (Orissa)

1st Party-Managements.

And

The President, All Orissa Railway Contractors'

Workers' Union, VR-5/l, Unit-III, Kharvela Nagar,

Bhubaneswar (Orissa) - 1.

2nd Party-Union.

Appearances :

None

:

For the 1 st Party-

Management.

None

:

For the 2nd Party-

Union.

ORDER

This reference was received in this Tribunal on

20.7.2012. The 2nd Party-Union was required to file the

statement of claim within fifteen days of receipt of the order

of reference in this Tribunal, but no statement of claim was

filed. Therefore a notice was issued to the 2nd Party-Union

on 6.12.2012 asking it to file the statement of claim by

17.12.2012. But when no response was received a further

notice was issued through regd. post to the 2nd Party-

Union on 4.3.2013 calling it to file the statement of claim by

23.4.2013. But even after issuing notice under regd. cover

no statement of claim was filed. The 2nd Party-Union was

further allowed time to file statement 'of claim by 13.6.2012,

but neither any-one appeared on behalf of the 2nd Party-

Union nor filed any statement of claim. Hence it appears

that the 2nd Party-Union is not interested in prosecuting

its case. It might be that the 2nd Party-Union has settled

the dispute out of court with the 1st Party-Management

and because of which the Union is not taking any steps in

the matter under dispute.

2. In the above circumstances there is no use to keep

the case pending indefinitely. Hence a no-dispute award is

required to be passed in the case. Accordingly a no-dispute

award is passed and the reference is answered in the above

terms.

JITENDRA SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 16 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1667-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ lh ,y

ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vlulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 32@2012)

dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 16&7&2013 dks çkIr

gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y&22012@69@2012&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the16th July, 2013

S.O. 1667.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 32/

2012) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the

Industrial Dispute between the management of J.K. Nagar

Colliery, Satgram Area, and their workmen, received by

the Central Government on 16-7-2013.

[ No. L-22012/69/2012-IR (CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL

TRIBUNAL-CUM-lABOUR COURT, ASANSOL

Present :

Sri Jayanta Kumar Sen, Presiding Officer

REFERENCE No. 32 OF 2012

Parties :

The management of J.K. Nagar Colliery,

Satgram Area,

M/s. ECl, Burdwan(WB)

Vs.

Sri D.K. Routh, Branch Jt. Secy., CMC

(HMS), Aradanga, Asansol(W.B.)

REPRESENTATIVES:

For the management :

None

For the union (Workman): None

INDUSTRY : COAL

STATE: West Bengal

Dated : 03.04.13

AWARD

In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-

section (1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947), Govt. of India

through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L-22012/

69/2012- I.R.(CM-II) dated 11.09.2012 has been pleased to

refer the following dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal.

4700

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of J.K. Nagar

Colliery not to pay HA @ 10% of basic to Sri

Mahendra Muchi is fair, appropriate and justified,

while J.K. Nagar comes under Raniganj (UA), which

is classified 'C' Class city and HRA payable is 10% of

basic and even in view classification comes under 'Z'

class where rate of HRA is 10% of Basic Pay?”

Having received the Order of Letter No.L-22012/69/

2012-I.R (CM-II) dated 11.09.2012 of the above said

reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour,

New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference case

No. 32 of 2012 was registered on 25.09.12 and accordingly

an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through

the registered post to the parties concerned directing them

to appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their

written statements along with the relevant documents and

a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance

of the said order notices by the registered post were sent

to the parties concerned.

On perusal of the case record, it has been found that

the workman is neither appearing nor taking any step since

long. It seems that the workman is now no more interested

to proceed with the case. Since the workman is not

interested to proceed with the case, the case is closed and

accordingly an order of "No Dispute Award" is hereby

passed.

ORDER

Let an "Award" be and the same is passed as "No

Dispute" existing. Send the copies of the order to the Govt.

of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for information and

needful. The reference is accordingly disposed of.

JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 16 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1668-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ lh ,y

ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vlulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 5@2007)

dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 16&7&2013 dks çkIr

gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y&22012@225@2006&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the16th July, 2013

S.O. 1668.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 5/2007)

of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial

Dispute between the management of M/s. Eastern

Coalfields Limited, and their workmen, received by the

Central Government on 16-7-2013.

[No. L-22012/225/2006-IR (CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL

TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL

Present : Sri Jayanta Kumar Sen, Presiding Officer

REFERENCE NO. 05 OF 2007

Parties :

The management of Chinakury

Colliery, M/s. ECL, Burdwan(WB)

Vs.

The Chief Org. Secy., KMC,

Sitarampur (W.B.)

REPRESENTATIVES:

For the management :

None

For the union (Workman) :

Sri R.K. Tripathi, Ld.

Representative

INDUSTRY : COAL

STATE: West Bengal

Dated -16.04.13

AWA RD

In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-

section(1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947), Govt. of India

through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L-22012/

225/2006-I.R.(CM-II) dated 08.01.2007 has been pleased to

refer the following dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Chinakury

Mine No. 111 under Sodepur Area of M/s. ECL in dismissing

Shri Santosh Bouri w.e.f. 24.06.2004 is legal and justified? If

not, to what relief is the workman entitled?"

Having received the Order of Letter No.L-22012/225/

2006-LR (CM-II) dated 08.01.2007 of the above said

reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New

Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference case No.

05 of 2007 was registered on 19.02.07and accordingly an

order to that effect-was passed to issue notices through

the registered post to the parties concerned directing them

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4701

to appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their

written statements along with the relevant documents and

a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance

of the said order notices by the registered post were sent

to the parties concerned.

On perusal of the case record, it has been found that

Sri R.K. Tripathi, representative of the Union, submitted

that the workman had already reinstated in the service and

was died thereafter and then his wife has got employment

in her plea. Sri Tripathi also prayed for the closure of the

case. Since the workman has passed away, the case is

closed and accordingly an order of "No Dispute Award" is

hereby passed.

ORDER

Let an "Award" be and the same is passed as "No

Dispute" existing. Send the copies of the order to the Govt.

of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for information and

needful. The reference is accordingly disposed of.

JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 16 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1669-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ lh ,y

ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vlulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 38@2008)

dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 16&7&2013 dks çkIr

gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y&22012@59@2008&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the16th July, 2013

S.O. 1669.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 38/

2008) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the

Industrial Dispute between the management of M/s.

Eastern Coalfields Limited, and their workmen, received

by the Central Government on 16-7-2013.

[No. L-22012/59/2008-IR (CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL

TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL

Present : Sri Jayanta Kumar Sen,

Presiding Officer

REFERENCE No. 38 OF 2008

Parties :

The management of Paras Cole

Colliery, M/s. ECL, Burdwan(WB)

Vs.

The Vice-President, KMC, Burdwan

(W.B).

REPRESENTATIVES:

For the management :

None

For the union (Workman) :

Sri S.K. Pandey,

Ld. Representative

INDUSTRY : COAL

STATE: West Bengal

Dated -21.02.13

AWA RD

In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-

section(1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947), Govt. of India

through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L-22012/

59/2008-I.R.(CM-II) dated 30.06.2008 has been pleased to

refer the following dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of M/s. ECL

in dismissing Shri Gujara Hari from service w.e.f.

21.05.2005 is legal and justified? To what relief is the

claimant entitled?"

Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/59/

2008-1. R (CM-II) dated 30.06.2008 of the above said

reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New

Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference case No.

38 of 2008 was registered on 15.07.08 and accordingly an

order to that effect was passed to issue notices through

the registered post to the parties concerned directing them

to appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their

written statements along with the relevant documents and

a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance

of the said order notices by the registered post were sent

to the parties concerned.

On perusal of the case record, it has been found that

the workman has already joined in the service. Since the

workman has joined in the service, the case is closed and

accordingly an order of "No Dispute Award" is hereby

passed.

ORDER

Let an "Award" be and the same is passed as "No

Dispute" existing. Send the copies of the order to the Govt.

of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for information and

needful. The reference is accordingly disposed of.

JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer

4702

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ubZ fnYyh] 16 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1670-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ lh

,y ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@ Je U;k;ky; vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k

37@2008) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 16&7&2013

dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y&22012@50@2008&vkbZ vkj (lh,e&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 16th July, 2013

S.O. 1670.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Diputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 37/2008)

of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial

dispute between the management of M/s. Eastern

Coalfields Limited, and their workmen, received by the

Central Government on 16-7-2013

[No. L-22012/50/2008-IR(CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT,

ASANSOL

Present: Sri Jayanta Kumar Sen, Presiding Officer

REFERENCE No. 37 OF 2008

Parties :

The management of Sodepur (R) Colliery,

M/s. ECL, Burdwan (WB)

Vs.

The Chief Org. Secy. KMC. Sitarampur (WB)

Representatives :

For the management

:

None

For the union (Workman) :

Sri R. K. Tripathi, Ld.

Representative

Industry : Coal

State : West Bengal

Dated - 16-4-13

AWARD

In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d)

of Sub-section (1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of

the Industrial Disptues Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),

Government of India through the Ministry of Labour

vide its Order No. L-22012/50/2008-IR(CM-II) dated

30-6-2008 has been pleased to refer the following

dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

‘‘Whether the action of the management of M/s.

ECL in dismissing Shri Mantu Shaw from service

w.e.f. 01-12-1998 is legal and justified? To what

relief is the claimant entitled?”

Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/

50/2008-IR (CM-II) dated 30-6-2008 of the above said

reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour,

New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference

case No. 37 of 2008 was registered on 15-7-08 and

accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue

notices through the registered post to the parties

concerned directing them to appear in the court on the

date fixed and to file their written statements along with

the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support

of their claims. In pursuance of the said order notices by

the registered post were sent to the parties concerned.

On perusal of the case record, it has been found

that Sri R. K. Tripathi, representative of the Union,

submitted that the workman has already reinstated in

the service and he prayed for the closure of the case.

Since the workman has already reinstated in service, the

case is closed and accordingly an order of ‘‘No Dispute

Award” is hereby passed.

ORDER

Let an ‘‘Award” be and the same is passed as ‘‘No

Dispute” existing. Send the copies of the order to the

Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for

information and needful. The reference is accordingly

disposed of.

JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 16 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1671-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ lh

,y ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@ Je U;k;ky; vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k

45@2006) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 16&7&2013

dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y&22012@225@2005&vkbZ vkj (lh,e&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 16th July, 2013

S.O. 1671.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Diputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 45/2006)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4703

of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial

dispute between the management of Kenda Area of M/s.

Eastern Coalfields Limited, and their workmen, received

by the Central Government on 16-7-2013

[No. L-22012/225/2005-IR(CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT,

ASANSOL

Present: Sri Jayanta Kumar Sen, Presiding Officer

REFERENCE No. 45 OF 2006

Parties :

The management of Chora Block Incline,

Kenda Area, M/s. ECL, Burdwan (WB)

Vs.

The Gen. Secy. KMC. Asansol, Burdwan (WB)

Representative :

For the management

:

None

For the union (Workman) :

Sri S. K. Pandey, Ld.

Representative

Industry : Coal

State : West Bengal

Dated - 03-04-13

AWARD

In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d)

of Sub-section (1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of

the Industrial Disptues Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),

Government of India through the Ministry of Labour

vide its Order No. L-22012/225/2005-IR(CM-II) dated

2-8-2006 has been pleased to refer the following dispute

for adjudication by this Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

‘‘Whether the action of the management of Chora

Block Incline, under Kenda Area of M/s. Eastern

Coalfields Limited in dismissing Sh. Musafir

Rajbhar, U.M. No. 501745, UG.L. from service w.e.f.

22-8-2003 is legal and justified? If not to what

relief is the workman entitled?”

Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/

225/2005-IR (CM-II) dated 2-8-2006 of the above said

reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour,

New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference

case No. 45 of 2006 was registered on 14-8-06 and

accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue

notices through the registered post to the parties

concerned directing them to appear in the court on the

date fixed and to file their written statements along with

the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support

of their claims. In pursuance of the said order notices by

the registered post were sent to the parties concerned.

On perusal of the case record, it has been found

that the workman Sh.Musafir Rajbhar moved his petition

dated 26-3-13 and submitted that he does not want to

proceed with the case as the Management is ready to

absorb him in service and also prayed for the closure of

the case. Since the workman is not interested to proceed

with the case, the case it closed and accordingly an order

of ‘‘No Dispute Award” is hereby passed.

ORDER

Let an ‘‘Award” be and the same is passed as ‘‘No

Dispute” existing. Send the copies of the order to the

Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for

information and needful. The reference is accordingly

disposed of.

JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 16 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1672-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ lh

,y ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@ Je U;k;ky; vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k

13@2012) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 16&7&2013

dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y&22012@16@2012&vkbZ vkj (lh,e&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 16th July, 2013

S.O. 1672.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Diputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 13/2012)

of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial

dispute between the management of J.K. Nagar Colliery,

M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited, and their workmen

received by the Central Government on 16-7-2013.

[No. L-22012/16/2012-IR(CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT,

ASANSOL

Present: Sri Jayanta Kumar Sen, Presiding Officer

4704

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

REFERENCE No. 13 OF 2012

Parties :

The management of J.K. Nagar Colliery,

Satgram Area, M/s. ECL, Burdwan (WB)

Vs.

Sri D.K. Routh, Branch Jt. Secy. CMC

(HMS), Aradanga, Asansol (W.B.)

Representative :

For the management

:

None

For the union (Workman) :

None

Industry : Coal

State : West Bengal

Dated - 03-04-13

AWARD

In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d)

of Sub-section (1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of

the Industrial Disptues Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),

Government of India through the Ministry of Labour

vide its Order No. L-22012/16/2012-IR(CM-II) dated

29-03-2012 has been pleased to refer the following

dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

‘‘Whether the action of the management of J.K.

Nagar Colliery in not payment HRA@ 10% of

basic to Sri Jankinath Bouri S/o Late Manohar

Bouri is fair and justified? To what relief the

concrrned workman is entitled?”

Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/

16/2012-IR (CM-II) dated 29-3-2012 of the above said

reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour,

New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference

case No. 13 of 2012 was registered on 19-4-12 and

accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue

notices through the registered post to the parties

concerned directing them to appear in the court on the

date fixed and to file their written statements along with

the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support

of their claims. In pursuance of the said order notices by

the registered post were sent to the parties concerned.

On perusal of the case record, it has been found

that the workman is neither appearing nor taking any

step since long. It seems that the workman is now no

more interested to proceed with the case. Since the

workman is not interested to proceed with the case, the case

it closed and accordingly an order of ‘‘No Dispute

Award” is hereby passed.

ORDER

Let an ‘‘Award” be and the same is passed as ‘‘No

Dispute” existing. Send the copies of the order to the

Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for

information and needful. The reference is accordingly

disposed of.

JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 16 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1673-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ lh

,y ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@ Je U;k;ky; vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k

12@2012) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 16&7&2013

dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y&22012@23@2012&vkbZ vkj (lh,e&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 16th July, 2013

S.O. 1673.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Diputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 12/2012)

of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial

dispute between the management of J.K. Nagar Colliery,

M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited, and their workmen,

received by the Central Government on 16-7-2013.

[No. L-22012/23/2012-IR(CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT,

ASANSOL

Present: Sri Jayanta Kumar Sen, Presiding Officer

REFERENCE No. 12 OF 2012

Parties :

The management of J.K. Nagar Colliery,

Satgram Area, M/s. ECL, Burdwan (WB)

Vs.

Sri D.K. Routh, Branch Jt. Secy. CMC

(HMS), Aradanga, Asansol, Burdwan

(W.B.)

Representative :

For the management

:

None

For the union (Workman) :

None

Industry : Coal

State : West Bengal

Dated - 20-03-13

AWARD

In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d)

of Sub-section (1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of

the Industrial Disptues Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4705

Government of India through the Ministry of Labour

vide its Order No. L-22012/23/2012-IR(CM-II) dated

29-03-2012 has been pleased to refer the following

dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

‘‘Whether the action of the management of J.K.

Nagar Colliery of M/s. ECL in not payment HRA@

10% of basic to Sri Binoy Roy S/o Late Janki Roy

is fair in fair and justified? To what relief the

concrrned workman is entitled?”

Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/

23/2012-IR (CM-II) dated 29-3-2012 of the above said

reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour,

New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference

cass No. 12 of 2012 was registered on 19-4-12 and

accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue

notices through the registered post to the parties

concerned directing them to appear in the court on the

date fixed and to file their written statements along with

the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support

of their claims. In pursuance of the said order notices by

the registered post were sent to the parties concerned.

On perusal of the case record, it has been found

that Sri D.K. Routh, Branch Jt. Secretary of the Union,

has endorsed that the case may be closed and a ‘‘No

Dispute Award” may be passed as the workman is not

interested to proceed with the case further. Since the

workman is not iterested to proceed with the case, the

case is closed and accordingly an order ‘‘No Dispute

Award” is hereby passed.

ORDER

Let an ‘‘Award” be and the same is passed as ‘‘No

Dispute” existing. Send the copies of the order to the

Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for

information and needful. The reference is accordingly

disposed of.

JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 16 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1674-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ lh ,y

ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@ Je U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k

08@2012) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 16&7&2013

dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y&22012@13@2012&vkbZ vkj (lh,e&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 16th July, 2013

S.O. 1674.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Diputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 08/2012)

of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial

dispute between the management of J.K. Nagar Colliery,

M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited, and their workmen,

received by the Central Government on 16-7-2013.

[No. L-22012/13/2012-IR(CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT,

ASANSOL

Present: Sri Jayanta Kumar Sen, Presiding Officer

REFERENCE No. 08 OF 2012

Parties :

The management of J.K. Nagar Colliery,

Satgram Area, M/s. ECL, Burdwan (WB)

Vs.

Sri D.K. Routh, Branch Jt. Secy. CMC

(HMS), Aradanga, Asansol, Burdwan (W.B.)

Representatives :

For the management

:

None

For the union (Workman) :

None

Industry : Coal

State : West Bengal

Dated - 19-03-13

AWARD

In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d)

of Sub-section (1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of

the Industrial Disptues Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),

Government of India through the Ministry of Labour

vide its Order No. L-22012/13/2012-IR(CM-II) dated

28-03-2012 has been pleased to refer the following

dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

‘‘Whether the action of the management of J.K.

Nagar Colliery of M/s. ECL in not payment HRA@

10% of basic to Sri Bapi Bouri S/o Late Rabin

Bouri is fair and justified? To what relief the

concrrned workman is entitled?”

Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/

13/2012-IR (CM-II) dated 28-3-2012 of the above said

reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour,

New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference

cass No. 08 of 2012 was registered on 19-4-12 and

4706

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue

notices through the registered post to the parties

concerned directing them to appear in the court on the

date fixed and to file their written statements along with

the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support

of their claims. In pursuance of the said order notices by

the registered post were sent to the parties concerned.

On perusal of the case record, it has been found

that Sri D.K. Routh, Branch Jt. Secretary of the Union,

has endorsed that the case may be closed and a ‘‘No

Dispute Award” may be passed as the workman is not

interested to proceed with the case further. Since the

workman is not interested to proceed with the case, the

case is closed and accordingly an order ‘‘No Dispute

Award” is hereby passed.

ORDER

Let an ‘‘Award” be and the same is passed as ‘‘No

Dispute” existing. Send the copies of the order to the

Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for

information and needful. The reference is accordingly

disposed of.

JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 16 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1675-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ lh ,y

ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@ Je U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k

11@2012) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 16&7&2013

dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y&22012@24@2012&vkbZ vkj (lh,e&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 16th July, 2013

S.O. 1675.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Diputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 11/2012)

of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Asansol now as shown in the Annexure, in the

Industrial dispute between the management of J.K. Nagar

Colliery, M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited, and their

workmen, which was received by the Central Government

on 16-7-2013.

[No. L-22012/24/2012-IR(CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT,

ASANSOL

Present: Sri Jayanta Kumar Sen, Presiding Officer

REFERENCE No. 11 OF 2012

Parties :

The management of J.K. Nagar Colliery,

Satgram Area, M/s. ECL, Burdwan (WB)

Vs.

Sri D.K. Routh, Branch Jt. Secy. CMC

(HMS), Aradanga, Asansol (W.B.)

Representatives :

For the Management

:

None

For the union (Workman) :

None

Industry : Coal

State : West Bengal

Dated - 19-03-13

AWARD

In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d)

of Sub-section (1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of

the Industrial Disptues Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),

Government of India through the Ministry of Labour

vide its Order No. L-22012/24/2012-IR(CM-II) dated

29-03-2012 has been pleased to refer the following

dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

‘‘Whether the action of the management of J.K.

Nagar Colliery of M/s. ECL in not payment HRA@

10% of basic to Sri Sujal Paul S/o Late Umapada

Paul is fair and justified? To what relief the

concerned workman is entitled?”

Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/

24/2012-IR (CM-II) dated 29-3-2012 of the above said

reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour,

New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference

cass No. 11 of 2012 was registered on 19-4-12 and

accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue

notices through the registered post to the parties

concerned directing them to appear in the court on the

date fixed and to file their written statements along with

the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support

of their claims. In pursuance of the said order notices by

the registered post were sent to the parties concerned.

On perusal of the case record, it has been found

that Sri D.K. Routh, Branch Jt. Secretary of the Union,

has endorsed that the case may be closed and a ‘‘No

Dispute Award” may be passed as the workman is not

interested to proceed with the case further. Since the

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4707

workman is not iterested to proceed with the case, the

case is closed and accordingly an order ‘‘No Dispute

Award” is hereby passed.

ORDER

Let an ‘‘Award” be and the same is passed as ‘‘No

Dispute” existing. Send the copies of the order to the

Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for

information and needful. The reference is accordingly

disposed of.

JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 16 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1676-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ lh ,y

ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@ Je U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k

4@2003) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 16&7&2013

dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y&22012@336@2001&vkbZ vkj (lh,e&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 16th July, 2013

S.O. 1676.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Diputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 04/2003)

of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial

dispute between the management of Jhanjra M.I.C. M/s.

Eastern Coalfields Limited, and their workmen received

by the Central Government on 16-7-2013.

[No. L-22012/336/2001-IR(CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT,

ASANSOL

Present: Sri Jayanta Kumar Sen, Presiding Officer

REFERENCE No. 04 OF 2003

Parties :

The management of Jhanjra M.I.C. M/s.

ECL, Burdwan (WB)

Vs.

The President UCMU (INTUC), Ukhra

Burdwan (W.B.)

Representatives :

For the management

:

Sri P.K. Das, Ld.

Repesentative

For the union (Workman) :

None

Industry : Coal

State : West Bengal

Dated - 26-03-13

AWARD

In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d)

of Sub-section (1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of

the Industrial Disptues Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),

Government of India through the Ministry of Labour

vide its Order No. L-22012/336/2001-IR(CM-II) dated

11-02-2003 has been pleased to refer the following

dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

‘‘Whether the action of the management of Jhanjra

M.I.C. M/s. Eastern Coalfields Ltd. in not providing

employment to Smt. Rani Majhi, dependent of

Late Samar Majhi is legal and justified? If not, to

what relief is the said dependent of the workman

entitled?”

Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/

336/2001-IR (CM-II) dated 11-2-2003 of the above said

reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour,

New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference

case No. 04 of 2003 was registered on 11-3-03 and

accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue

notices through the registered post to the parties

concerned directing them to appear in the court on the

date fixed and to file their written statements along with

the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support

of their claims. In pursuance of the said order notices by

the registered post were sent to the parties concerned.

On perusal of the case record, it has been found

that the workman is neither appearing nor taking any

step since long. It seems that the workman has now no

more interest in this case. The case is also too old-

2003. Since the workman is not iterested to proceed

with the case, the case is closed and accordingly an

order of ‘‘No Dispute Award” is hereby passed.

ORDER

Let an ‘‘Award” be and the same is passed as ‘‘No

Dispute” existing. Send the copies of the order to the

Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for

information and needful. The reference is accordingly

disposed of.

JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer

4708

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ubZ fnYyh] 16 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1677-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ lh ,y

ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@ Je U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k

07@2012) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 16&7&2013

dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y&22012@14@2012&vkbZ vkj (lh,e&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 16th July, 2013

S.O. 1677.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Diputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 07/2012)

of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial

dispute between the management of J.K. Nagar Colliery,

M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited, and their workmen

received by the Central Government on 16-7-2013.

[No. L-22012/14/2012-IR(CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT,

ASANSOL

Present: Sri Jayanta Kumar Sen, Presiding Officer

Reference No. 07 of 2012

Parties :

The management of Jhanjra Nagar Colleiry

M/s. ECL, Burdwan (WB)

Vs.

Sri D.K. Routh, Branch Jt. Secy.

CMC(HMS), Aradanga, Asansol, Burdwan

(W.B.)

Representatives :

For the management

:

None

For the union (Workman) :

None

Industry : Coal

State : West Bengal

Dated - 19-03-13

AWARD

In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d)

of Sub-section (1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of

the Industrial Disptues Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),

Government of India through the Ministry of Labour

vide its Order No. L-22012/14/2012-IR(CM-II) dated

29-7-2012 has been pleased to refer the following

dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

‘‘Whether the action of the management of J.K.

Nagar Colliery of M/s. ECL in not paying HRA @

10% of basic to Sri Jalandhar Rajbhar S/o Late

Chikuri Rajbhar is fair and justified? To what relief

the concerned workman is entitled?”

Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/

14/2012-IR (CM-II) dated 29-3-2012 of the above-said

reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour,

New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference

case No. 07 of 2012 was registered on 19-4-12 and

accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue

notices through the registered post to the parties

concerned directing them to appear in the court on the

date fixed and to file their written statements along with

the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support

of their claims. In pursuance of the said order notices by

the registered post were sent to the parties concerned.

On perusal of the case record, it has been found

that Sri D.K. Routh Branch Jt. Secretary of the Union,

has endorsed that the case may be closed and a ‘‘No

Dispute Award” may be passed as the workman is not

interested to proceed with the case further. Since the

workman is not interested to proceed wtih the case, the

the case is closed and accordingly an order of ‘‘No

Dispute Award” is hereby passed.

ORDER

Let an ‘‘Award” be and the same is passed as ‘‘No

Dispute” existing. Send the copies of the order to the

Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for

information and needful. The reference is accordingly

disposed of.

JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 16 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1678-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ lh

,y ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vklulsky ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k

50@1995) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 16&07&2013

dks izkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y& 22012@65@1995&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4709

New Delhi, the 16th July, 2013

S.O.

1678.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947) the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 50/1995)

of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Asansol now as shown in the Annexure in the

Industrial Dispute between the management of Parbelia

Colliery, M/s. E.C. Ltd. and their workmen, received by

the Central Government on 16-07-2013.

[No. L-22012/65/1995-IR(CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM-LABOUR COURT,

ASANSOL

Present :

Sri Jayanta Kumar Sen,

Presiding Officer

Reference No. 50 of 1995

Parties :

The management of Parbelia Colliery,

M/s. ECL, Purulia (W.B.)

Vs.

The Gen. Secy., W.B.K.M.S.(UTUC),

Sitarampur, Burdwan (W.B.)

Representatives :

For the management :

Sri P. K. Das, Ld.

Representative

For the union (Workman) :

None

Industry : Coal

State : West Bengal

Dated the 19th March, 2013

AWARD

In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-

Section(1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947), Govt. of India

through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L-22012/

65/95-I.R.(CM-II) dated 21-09-1995 has been pleased to

refer the following dispute for adjudication by this

Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of Parbelia

Colliery of M/s. E.C. Ltd., in not sending Sh. Bimal

Majhee, Pump Khalasi to age determination

Committee for determination of his correct age is

justified ? If not, to what relief is the workman is

entitlted to ?”

Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/65/

95-I.R (CM-II) dated 21-09-1995 of the above said reference

from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for

adjudication of the dispute, a reference case No. 50 of

1995 was registered on 05-10-95 and accordingly, an order

to that effect was passed to issue notices through the

registered post to the parties concerned directing them to

appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their written

statements along with the relevant documents and a list

of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance of

the said order notices by the registered post were sent to

the parties concerned.

On perusal of the case record, it has been found that

the workman is neither appearing nor taking any step since

1997. It seems that the workman has now no more interest

in this case. The case is also too old in the year of 1995.

Since the workman is not interested to proceed with the

case, the case is closed and accordingly an order of “No

Dispute Award” is hereby passed.

ORDER

Let an “Award” be and the same is passed as “No

Dispute” existing. Send the copies of the order to the Govt.

of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for information

and needful. The reference is accordingly disposed of.

JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 16 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1679-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ lh

,y ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vklulsky ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k

06@2012) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 16&07&2013

dks izkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y& 22012@15@2012&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 16th July, 2013

S.O.

1679.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947) the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No.06/2012)

of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial

Dispute between the management of J.K. Nagar Colliery,

M/s. E.C. Ltd., and their workman, received by the Central

Government on 16-07-2013.

[No. L-22012/15/2012-IR(CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

4710

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM-LABOUR COURT,

ASANSOL

Present :

Sri Jayanta Kumar Sen,

Presiding Officer

Reference No. 06 of 2012

Parties :

The management of J. K. Nagar

Colliery, M/s. ECL, Burdwan (W.B.)

Vs.

The Sri D. K. Routh, Branch Secy.,

CMC(HMS), Burdwan (W.B.)

Representatives :

For the management :

None

For the Union (Workman) :

None

Industry : Coal

State : West Bengal

Dated, the 13th March, 2013

AWARD

In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-

section(1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947), Govt. of India

through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L-22012/

15/2012-I.R.(CM-II) dated 29-03-2012 has been pleased to

refer the following dispute for adjudication by this

Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of J. K.

Nagar Colliery of M/s. ECL in not paying HRA @

10% of basic to Sri Ramu Ruidas S/o Late Habul

Ruidas is fair and justified ? To what relief the

concerned workman is entitled to?”

Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/15/

2012-IR (CM-II) dated 29-03-2012 of the abovesaid

reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New

Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference case No.

06 of 2012 was registered on 19-04-12 and accordingly an

order to that effect was passed to issue notices through

the registered post to the parties concerned directing them

to appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their

written statements along with the relevant documents and

a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance

of the said order notices by the registered post were sent

to the parties concerned.

On perusal of the case record, it has been found that

Sri D. K. Routh, Branch Joint Secretary of the union, has

endorsed that the case may be closed and no dispute

award may be passed as the workman is now no more

interested to proceed with the case any further. Since the

workman is no more interested to proceed with the case,

the case is closed and accordingly an order of “No Dispute

Award” is hereby passed.

ORDER

Let an “Award” be and the same is passed as “No

Dispute” existing. Send the copies of the order of the Govt.

of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for information

and needful. The reference is accordingly disposed of.

JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 16 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1680-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ lh

,y ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k

10@2012) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 16&07&2013

dks izkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y& 22012@11@2012&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 16th July, 2013

S.O. 1680.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 10/2012)

of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial

Dispute between the management of J.K. Nagar Colliery,

M/s. E.C. Ltd., and their workmen, received by the Central

Government on 16-07-2013.

[No. L-22012/11/2012-IR(CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM-LABOUR COURT,

ASANSOL

Present :

Sri Jayanta Kumar Sen,

Presiding Officer

Reference No. 10 of 2012

Parties :

The management of J. K. Nagar

Colliery, M/s. ECL, Burdwan (W.B.)

Vs.

The Branch Secy., CMC(HMS),

Aradanga, Asansol (W.B.)

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4711

Representatives :

For the management :

Sri P. K. Goswami,

Ld. Advocate

For the Union (Workman) :

D. K. Routh, Ld.

Representative

Industry : Coal

State : West Bengal

Dated, the 14th March, 2013

AWARD

In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-

section(1) and sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947), Govt. of India

through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L-22012/

11/2012-IR(CM-II) dated 28-03-2012 has been pleased to

refer the following dispute for adjudication by this

Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of J. K.

Nagar Colliery of M/s. ECL in not paying HRA @

10% of basic to Sri Balmiki Ram is fair and

justified ? To what relief the concerned workman is

entitled to ?”

Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/11/

2012-I.R (CM-II) dated 28-03-2012 of the abovesaid

reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New

Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference case

No. 10 of 2012 was registered on 19-04-12 and accordingly

an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through

the registered post to the parties concerned directing them

to appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their

written statements along with the relevant documents and

a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance

of the said order notices by the registered post were sent

to the parties concerned.

On perusal of the case record, it has been found that

Sri D. K. Routh, Branch Secretary of the union, appears

and prayed for the closure of the case as the workman is

not interested to proceed with the case any further. Since

the workman is not interested to proceed with the case,

the case is closed and accordingly an order of “No Dispute

Award” is hereby passed.

ORDER

Let an “Award” be and the same is passed as “No

Dispute” existing. Send the copies of the order of the Govt.

of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for information

and needful. The reference is accordingly disposed of.

JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 16 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1681-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ lh

,y ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vklulsky ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k

51@1993) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 16&07&2013

dks izkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y& 22012@281@1993&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 16th July, 2013

S.O.

1681.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947) the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 51/1993)

of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial

Dispute between the management of M/s. E.C. Ltd., and

their workmen, received by the Central Government on

16-07-2013.

[No. L-22012/281/1993-IR(CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM-LABOUR COURT,

ASANSOL

Present : Sri Jayanta Kumar Sen, Presiding Officer

Reference No. 51 of 1993

Parties :

The management of Shyamsundarpur Colliery, M/s.

ECL, Burdwan(WB)

Vs.

The Working President, CMU, Ukhra, Burdwan

(W.B.)

Representatives :

For the management :

Sri P. K. Das, Ld.

Advocate

For the union (Workman) :

None

Industry : Coal

State : West Bengal

Dated, the 14th March, 2013

AWARD

In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-

section(1) and sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947), Govt. of India

through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L-22012/

281/93-IR(CM-II) dated 16-02-93 has been pleased to refer

the following dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal.

4712

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

SCHEDULE

‘‘Whether the action of the management of

Shyamsundarpur Colliery, Bankola Area, M/s. ECL,

PO: Ukhra, Distt. Burdwan in dismissing Shri Suku

Majhi, UG Loader in the Shyamsundarpur Colliery

vide their letter No. BA/PD/Dis/1786 dated 27-5-91

is justified? If not, to what relief the workman is

entitled to?’’

Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/

281/93-IR (CM-II) dated 16-2-93 of the above said reference

from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for

adjudication of the dispute, a reference case No. 51 of

1993 was registered on 23.12.93 and accordingly an order

to that effect was passed to issue notices through the

registered post to the parties concerned directing them to

appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their written

statements along with the relevant documents and a list

of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance of

the said order notices by the registered post were sent to

the parties concerned.

On perusal of the case record, it has been found that

the workman is neither appearing nor taking any step since

1ong. It seems that the workman is now no more interested

to proceed with the case any further. The case is also too

old- 1993. Since the workman is not interested to proceed

with the case, the case is closed and accordingly an order

of "No Dispute Award" is hereby passed.

ORDER

Let an "Award" be and the same is passed as "No

Dispute" existing. Send the copies of the order to the Govt.

of India, Ministry of Labour,' New Delhi for information

and needful. The reference is accordingly disposed of.

JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 16 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1682-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ lh

,y ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky; vklulsky ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 73@2000)

dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 16&07&2013 dks

izkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y& 22012@41@2000&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 16th July, 2013

S.O.

1682.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947) the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 73/2000)

of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial

Dispute between the management of M/s. E.C. Ltd., and

their workman, which was received by the Central

Government on 16-07-2013.

[No. L-22012/41/2000-IR(CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

ASANSOL

Present : Sri Jayanta Kumar Sen, Presiding Officer

Reference No. 73 of 2000

Parties :

The management of Bahula Colliery, M/s., ECL,

Burdwan (WB)

Vs.

The Gen. Secy., UCMU(INTUC), Ukhra, Burdwan

(W.B.)

Representatives :

For the management :

Sri P. K. Goswami,

Ld. Advocate

For the union (Workman) :

None

Industry : Coal

State : West Bengal

Dated 13th March, 2013

AWARD

In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-

section(1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947), Govt. of India

through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L-22012/

41/2000-IR(CM-II) dated -4-8-2000 has been pleased to

refer the following dispute for adjudication by this

Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Bahula

Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Ltd. in not

regularising Sh. Moloy Kumar Banerjee, Mining

Helper as Cap Lamp Issue Clerk w.e.f. 1991 is legal

and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is

entitled?"

Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/41/

2000-IR (CM-II) dated 4-8-2000 of the above said reference

from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for

adjudication of the dispute, a reference case No. 73 of

2000 was registered on 6-9-2000 and accordingly an order

to that effect was passed to issue notices through the

registered post to the parties concerned directing them to

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4713

appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their written

statements along with the relevant documents and a list

of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance of

the said order notices by the registered post were sent to

the parties concerned.

On perusal of the case record, it has been found that

the workman is neither appearing nor taking any step since

long. It seems that the workman has lost his interest to

proceed with the case any further. Since the workman is

no more interested to proceed with the case, the case is

closed and accordingly an order of "No Dispute Award"

is hereby passed.

ORDER

Let an "Award" be and the same is passed as "No

Dispute" existing. Send the copies of the order to the Govt.

of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for information

and needful. The reference is accordingly disposed of.

JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 16 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1683-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ lh

,y ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vklulsky ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k

148@1999) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks

16&07&2013 dks izkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y& 22012@88@1999&vkbZ- vkj- (lh,e&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 16th July, 2013

S.O. 1683.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 148/1999)

of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Asansol now as shown in the Annexure in the

Industrial Dispute between the management of M/s. E.C.

Ltd., and their workman, which was received by the Central

Government on 16-07-2013.

[No. L-22012/88/1999-IR(CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

ASANSOL

Present : Sri Jayanta Kumar Sen, Presiding Officer

Reference No. 148 of 1999

Parties :

The management of Lachipur Colliery, M/s. ECL,

Burdwan(WB)

Vs.

The Asst. Gen. Secy., KMC, Asansol (W.B.)

Representatives :

For the Management :

None

For the Union (Workman) :

None

Industry : Coal

State : West Bengal

Dated 20-2 2013

AWARD

In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-

section(1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947), Govt. of India

through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L-22012/

88/99-IR (CM-II) dated 31-8-1999 has been pleased to refer

the following dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Lachipur

Colliery of M/s. ECL in forcefully superannuating

Sh. Durja Dakua, Wagon Loader from 1-7-88 and

subsequently allowing him in duty on 23-7-89 and

not paying the wages for the period of forced

idleness from 1-7-88 to 23-7-89 is legal and justified?

If not, to what relief the workman is entitled?"

Having received the Order of Letter No.L-22012/88/

99-IR (CM-II) dated 31-8-1999 of the above said reference

from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for

adjudication of the dispute, a reference case No. 148 of

1999 was registered on 14-9-99 and accordingly an order

to that effect was passed to issue notices through the

registered post to the parties concerned directing them to

appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their written

statements along with the relevant documents and a list

of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance of

the said order notices by the registered post were sent to

the parties concerned.

On perusal of the case record, it has been found that

the Union is neither appearing nor taking any step after

16.02.2006 despite registered notices. Several opportunities

were given but of no effect. It seems that the workman is

now no more interested to proceed with the case further.

Since the Union does not want to proceed with the case

further, the case is closed and accordingly an order of "No

Dispute Award" is hereby passed.

ORDER

Let an "Award" be and the same is passed as "No

Dispute" existing. Send the copies of the order to the Govt.

4714

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for information

and needful. The reference is accordingly disposed of.

JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 16 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1684-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ ch lh

lh ,y ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds

chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vklulsky ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k

37@1993) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 16&07&2013

dks izkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y& 22012@118@1993&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º

ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 16th July, 2013

S.O. 1684.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 37/1993)

of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Asansol now as shown in the Annexure in the

Industrial Dispute between the management of M/s. BCCL

and their workman, which was received by the Central

Government on 16-07-2013.

[No. L-22012/118/1993-IR(CM-II)]

B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

ASANSOL

Present : Sri Jayanta Kumar Sen, Presiding Officer

Reference No. 37 of 1993

Parties :

The management of, Ropeway, B.B. Camp, M/s.

BCCL, Dhanbad(Jharkhand)

Vs.

The Gen. Secy., CREU, Purulia (W.B.)

Representatives :

For the management :

None

For the union (Workman) :

None

Industry : Coal

State : Jharkhand

Dated 21-2 2013

AWARD

In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-

section(1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947), Govt. of India

through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L-22012/

118/93-IR (CM-II) dated 17-8-1993 has been pleased to

refer the following dispute for adjudication by this

Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Central

Ropeways, B.B. Camp, in not paying the wages to

Shri Kalachand Bouri for the period from 22-8-90 to

23-12-90 and to Narayan Kumar, Kamdeb Bouri and

Nando Kumbhakar for the period from 11-9-90 to

23-12-90 is justified ? If not, to what relief is the

concerned workmen entitled to?"

Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/

118/93-IR (CM-II) dated 17-8-1993 of the above said

reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New

Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference case No.

37 of 1993 was registered on 23-8-93 and accordingly an

order to that effect was passed to issue notices through

the registered post to the parties concerned directing them

to appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their

written statements along with the relevant documents and

a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance

of the said order notices by the registered post were sent

to the parties concerned.

On perusal of the case record, it has been found that

the Union is neither appearing nor taking any step since

long despite registered notices. Several opportunities were

given but of no effect. It seems that the workman is now

no more interested to proceed with the case further. Since

the case is too old-1993, the case is closed and accordingly

an order of "No Dispute Award" is hereby passed.

ORDER

Let an "Award" be and the same is passed as "No

Dispute" existing. Send the copies of the order to the Govt.

of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for information

and needful. The reference is accordingly disposed of.

JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 17 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1685-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj ueZnk ekyok

xzkeh.k cSad ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds

chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky; tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 78@93)

dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 12&07&2013 dks

izkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y& 12012@30@93&vkbZvkj (ch&I)º

lqefr ldykuh] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4715

New Delhi, the 17th July, 2013

S.O. 1685.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947) the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No.78/93)

of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial

Dispute between the management of Narmada Malwa

Gramin Bank and their workmen, received by the Central

Government on 12-07-2013.

[No. L-12012/30/93-IR(B-I)]

SUMATI SAKLANI, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT,

JABALPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/R/78/93

PRESIDING OFFICER : SHRI R. B. PATLE

Shri Prem Narayin,

S/o Shri Balaram Raikwar,

205, Laxmi Nagar Colony,

Ujjain

...Workman

Versus

The President,

Narmada Malwa Gramin Bank,

Dashhara Maidan,

Ujjain

... Management

AWARD

Passed on this 10th day of June, 2013

1. As per letter dated 7-4-1993 by the Government of

India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi the reference is

received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under

Section -10 of I. D. Act, 1947 as per Notification No. L-

12012/30/93-IR(B-I) . The dispute under reference relates

to :

" Whether the action of the management of Indore

Ujjain Kshetriya Gramin Bank in not regularizing the

services of Shri Prem Narain Balaram is justified? If

not, to what relief the workman is entitled to and

from which date?"

2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to

the parties. 1st party workman submitted his statement of

claim at Page 2/1 to 2/3. The case of 1st party workman is

that he was working with IInd party as messenger from

1986 to 1991. Again after gap of one month, continuously

worked till year 1994. His services were terminated after he

had approached Labour Officer, Indore. 1st party claims

that he was continuously working for 5 years he was dong

work of scavenging, distribution of letters, filling water,

movements of files, stationery etc. That he had completed

240 days continuous service during each of the year.

3. IInd party submitted Written Statement at Page

7/1 to 7/4. It is submitted by IInd party that the rural banks

were established as per act of 1976. 1st party workman

was engaged as per exigency of work. He had never

completed 90 days of service in a calendar year or 240

days continuous service during any of the year. That

services of 1st party were engaged when regular employee

used to remain absent. That services of 34 casual

employees were regularized as per settlement before ALC,

Indore. The name of 1st party was not appearing in it. IInd

party further contented that the reference is not legal,

there is no industrial dispute and therefore reference

deserves to be rejected.

4. Ist party filed rejoinder at Page 8/1 to 8/3. He has

reiterated his earlier pledings that he was working as

messenger during leave vacancy. That he has

continuously worked for 3 years with IInd party. He had

completed 240 days service during each of the calendar

year. That his services were termmated illegally.

5. Considering pleadings on record, the points

which arise for my consideration and determination are as

under. My findings are recorded against each of them for

the reasons as below :-

(i) Whether the action of the —

In Affirmative

management of Indore

Ujjain Kshetriya Gramin

Bank in not regularizing

the services of Shri Prem

Narain Balaram is justified?

(ii) If so, to what relief the

—

Relief prayed by

workman is entitled to?"

workman is rejected.

REASONS

6. 1st party workman is claiming for reinstatement. It

is submitted that he was continuously working for a period

of 3 years and then terminated whereas the terms of

reference deals with whether the action of the management

in not regularizing services of 1st party workman is legal.

1st party workman filed affidavit of his evidence at Page

19/1 to 19/2. In his evidence, he has stated that he was

continuously working as messenger with Ilnd party from

February, 1988 to May, 1991. He had completed 240 days

continuous work during each of the year. That he was

doing different works of messenger. In his cross-

examination, workman says he was engaged on daily

wages. He knows one Gajanand Sharma. At the time of his

evidence, he was not working in the Ilnd party. He was

discontinued from work from 1992. He denied that he was

engaged by Bank as per exigency of work.

4716

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

7. Management filed affidavit of evidence of witness

Shri Devi Singh Nayak . The said witness has stated that

1st party was engaged for cleaning work as per exigency.

He was paid wages for petty works. That 1st party is

claiming regularization without following recruitment rules.

The evidence of management's witness remained

unchallenged as 1st party workman failed to cross-examine

the said witness.

8. After the evidence was closed, case was fixed for

argument on 13-11-11, 11-4-2012, 5-10-12 but paties

remained absent. On, 12-4-13, the parties remamed absent,

notice was directed to be issued. It appears that no notice

was issued to the parties. However, both parties remained

absent from 29-5-2013. The conduct of parties shows that

they did not show interest in argument of the matter. The

pleadings and evidence of 1st party doesnot show that he

was continuously working with the IInd party. His

appointment was not made following recruitment process.

The unchallenged evidence of management's witness is

on the point that 1st party workman was engaged as per

exigency of work without following recruitment rules. The

evidence discussed above does not establish claim of 1st

party for regularization of service. For above reasons, I

answer Point No.1 in Affirmative.

9. Point No. 2- In view of my finding on Point No.1,

as 1st party are not appointed after following procedure

for recruitment rather unchallenged evidence of

management's witness that the services of 1st party were

engaged as per exigency of work. The workman is not

entitled to regularization. The relief prayed by workman is

rejected.

10. Accordingly award is passed as under :—

(1) The action of the IInd party management in not

regularizing the services of 1st party Shri Prem Narain

Balaram is justified.

(2) Relief prayed by workman is rejected.

R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 17 tqykbZ] 2013

dk-vk- 1686-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947

dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj Hkkjrh; LVsV

cSad ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 19@98)

dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 12&07&2013 dks

izkIr gqvk Fkk A

¹la- ,y& 12012@109@97&vkbZvkj (ch&I)º

lqefr ldykuh] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, 17th July, 2013

S.O. 1686.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947) the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No.19/98)

of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial

Dispute between the management of State Bank of India

and their workmen, received by the Central Government

on 12-07-2013.

[No. L-12012/109/97-IR(B-I)]

SUMATI SAKLANI, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM - LABOUR COURT,

JABALPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/R/19/98

Presiding Officer : SHRI R.B.PATLE

Shri Ramadhar Parganiha,

S/o Bisru Ram Parganiha,

Block No. 29/1 /H,

Risali Sector,

Bhilai, Distt. Durg (MP)

...Workman

Versus

Regional Manager,

State Bank of India,

Region-III, Shankar Nagar,

Raipur (MP)

...Management

AWARD

Passed on this 24th day of June, 2013

1. As per letter dated 21-1-98 by the Government of

India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is

received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under

Section -10 of I. D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No. L-

12012/l09/97-IR(B-I). The dispute under reference relates

to :

" Whether the action of the management of State

Bank of India, through Regional Manager, Region-

III, Raipur in relation to their Sector-I, Bhilai Branch

in refusing employment to Shri Ramadhar Parganiha,

waterman w.e. f. 29-10-95 is lawful and justified? If

not, to what relief is the workman entitled to?"

2. After receiving reference notices were issued to

the parties. Statement of claim is submitted, by workman

at Page 6/1 to 6/4. It is case of 1st party workman that he

was appointed on 1-7-95 on permanent post of waterman.

He was continuously working with IInd party till

20-10-95. His services were orally terminated on 28-8-95.

That in Conciliation proceedings, IInd party had admitted

¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935

4717

that workman was paid wages Rs. 20 per day. That

workman claims that he had continuously worked for 480

days. His services were discontinued without paying

retrenchment compensation, without notice in violation

of Section 25-F of I.D.Act. That junior employees

Mr. Tondon was continued as waterman. Termination of

his services is illegal. Rule 76, 77 of I.D. Act was not

complied Principles of last come 1st go was not followed.

On such grounds, workman is praying for his reinstatement

with consequential benefits.

3. IInd party filed Written Statement at Page 9/1 to

9/3. IInd party denied that workman was appointed on

permanent vacant post of waterman from 1-7-94 to 28-10-

95. It is submitted that applicant was engaged as temporary

employee due to exigencies. He was paid Rs. 20 to 25as

part time worker. That workman was not in continuous

service. He was working as per the terms of contract. That

services are not terminated in violation of provisions of

I.D. Act. That workman is not covered as defined under

I.D. Act. He was not appointed on permanent post. IInd

party prays for rejection of claim of workman.

4. Considering pleadings on record, the points

which arise for my consideration and determination are as

under. My findings are recorded against each of them for

the reasons as below :—

(i) “Whether the action of the

In Affirmative

management of State Bank of

India, through Regional

Manager, Region-III, Raipur

in relation to their Sector-I,

Bhilai Branch in refusing

employment to Shri Ramadhar

Parganiha, waterman w.e.f.

29-10-95 is legal ?

(ii) If so, to what relief the

Relief prayed by

workman is entitled to?"

workman is rejected.

REASONS

5. Though workman challenged termination of his

services from 29-10-95, he has failed to adduce evidence

in support of his claim. Workman was proceeded ex parte

on 18-1-95. Management filed affidavit of its witness Shri

Jayant Bhardwaj. He has stated in his affidavit that the

workman was not engaged against permanent vacant post.

Workman was engaged on daily wage basis as per

exigency of work. He was feed to come on next day for his

work. The management was at liberty not engaging him

on next date. That Branch Manager working at various

branches has no authority to appoint any subordinate

staff on regular basis, however, they are authorized to

appoint person on daily wages depending upon exigency

of work. That workman has not worked for 240 days in any

calendar year. He is not entitled to retrenchment

compensation. That there is no relationship of master and

employee. The evidence of management's witness

remained unchallenged as workman failed to cross-examine

the witness of the management.

6. Considering unchallenged evidence of

management's witness and the workman has not adduced

any evidence in support of his claim, it cannot be said that

the action of the management is legal. For above reasons,

I record my finding in Point No.1 in Affirmative.

7. In the result, award is passed as under :—

1. The action of the management of State Bank of

India, through Regional Manager, Region-III, Raipur

in relation to their Sector- I, Bhilai Branch in refusing

employment to Shri Ramadhar Parganiha, waterman

w.e.f. 29-10-95 is legal.

2. Relief prayed by workman is rejected.

R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer

Printed by the Manager, Government of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi-110064

and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi-110054.