x`g ea=kky;
(jktHkk"kk foHkkx)
ubZ fnYyh] 30 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1613-—jktHkk"kk (la?k ds 'kkldh; iz;kstuksa ds
fy, iz;ksx) fu;e 1976 ds fu;e 10(4) ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnz
ljdkj vYila[;d dk;Z ea=kky; dks ftlds 80 izfr'kr ls vf/d
vf/dkfj;ksa ,oa deZpkfj;ksa us fgUnh dk dk;Zlk/d Kku izkIr dj
fy;k gS] vf/lwfpr djrh gS A
¹la- 12022@2@2013&jk-zHkk-@dk&IIº
gfjUnz oqQekj] funs'kd (dk;kZUo;u)
MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS
(Department of Official Language)
New Delhi, the 30th July, 2013
S.O. 1613.—In pursuance of Rule 10 (4) of the
Official Language (Use for official purposes of the Union)
Rule 1976, the Central Government here notifies Ministry
of Minority Affairs where more than 80% staff has acquired
the working knowledge of Hindi.
[ No. 12022/2/2013-OL /Impl.II]
HARINDER KUMAR, Director (Implementation)
'kgjh fodkl ea=kky;
(laink funs'kky;)
ubZ fnYyh] 22 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1614-—dsUnzh; ljdkj] ljdkjh LFkku (vizkfèkÑr
vf/Hkksfx;ksa dh csn[kyh) vf/fu;e] 1971 (1971 dk 40) dh /
kjk 3 }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, vkSj Hkkjr ds jkti=k]
rkjh[k 12 ebZ] 1990 esa izdkf'kr vf/lwpuk la[;kad
dk-vk- 1377] rkjh[k 3] ebZ] 1990 ds vf/Øe.k esa] jkT; lHkk ds
lHkkifr ls ijke'kZ djus ds i'pkr~ uhps lkj.kh ds LraHk (1) esa
mfYyf[kr vf/dkfj;ksa dks] tks ljdkj ds jktif=kr vf/dkjh gSa]
mDr vf/fu;e ds iz;kstu ds fy, laink vf/dkjh fu;qDr djrh
gS tks mDr lkj.kh ds LraHk (2) esa dh rRLFkkuh izfof"V esa fofufn"V
ljdkjh LFkku ds laca/ esa mDr vf/fu;e }kjk ;k mlds v/hu
laink vf/dkfj;ksa dsk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx vkSj vf/jksfir
drZO;ksa dk ikyu djsaxs A
jftLVªh la- Mh- ,y- (,u) 04@0007@2003µ05
REGD. NO. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05
izkf/dkj ls izdkf'kr
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
lkIrkfgd
WEEKLY
la- 32]
ubZ fnYyh, vxLr 4—vxLr 10] 2013] '[email protected] 13—Jko.k 19] 1935
No. 32]
NEW DELHI, AUGUST 4—AUGUST 10, 2013, SATURDAY/SRAVANA 13—SRAVANA 19, 1935
Hkkx esa fHkUu i`"B la[;k nh tkrh gS ftlls fd ;g i`Fkd ladyu ds :i esa j[kk tk lds
Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation
Hkkx II—[k.M 3—mi&[k.M (ii)
PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)
Hkkjr ljdkj ds ea=kky;ksa (j{kk ea=kky; dks NksM+dj) }kjk tkjh fd, x, lkafof/d vkns'k vkSj vf/lwpuk,a
Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India
(Other than the Ministry of Defence)
3303 GI/2013
(4207)
4208
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
lkj.kh
laink vf/dkjh
ljdkjh LFkku dk izoxZ
(1)
(2)
jkT; lHkk lfpoky;] ubZ
ljdkjh Fkku (vizkf/Ñr
fnYyh esa lnL; lq[k lqfo/k,a vf/Hkksfx;ksa dh csn[kyh)
vuqHkkx ds Hkkjlk/d mi funs'kd vf/fu;e] 1971 (1971 dk 40)
;k la;qDr funs'kd@lk/kj.k iz'kklu ds izkjaHk ls iwoZ ;k mlds i'pkr~
vuqHkkx ds Hkkjlk/d mifuns'kd lfpoky; ds deZpkfjao`n ds
;k la;qDr funs'kd A fdlh lnL; dks fuokl LFkku
iznku djus ds fy, dsUnzh;
ljdkj }kjk jkT; lHkk lfpoky;
ds fu;a=k.kk/hu j[ks x, ljdkj
LFkku A
¹iQk- la- 22012@2@2013&uhfrº
,l- ds- tSu] laink funs'kd (uhfr)
MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT
(Directorate of Estates)
New Delhi, the 22nd July, 2013
S.O. 1614.—In exercise of the powers conferred by
Section 3 of the Public Premises (Eviction of unauthorised
Occupants) Act, 1971, (40 of 1971) and in supersession of
the notification number S.O. 1377, dated 3rd May, 1990,
published vide Gazette of India dated 12th May, 1990,
the Central Government, after consultation with the
Chairman, Rajya Sabha, hereby appoints the officers
mentioned in column (1) of the Table below, being Gazetted
Officers of Government, to be the estate officers for the
purpose of the said Act, who shall exercise the powers
conferred and perform the duties imposed on estate
officers by or under the said Act in respect of the public
premises specified in the corresponding entry in column
(2) of the said Table.
TABLE
Estate officers
Category of Public Premises
(1)
(2)
Deputy Director or Joint
Public premises which have
Director in charge of
been placed by the Central
Members’ Amenities
Government under the control
Section/Deputy Director of the Rajya Sabha Secretariat
or Joint Director in charge for providing residential
of General Administration accommodation to any member
Section in the Rajya
of the staff of the Secretariat,
Sabha Secretariat,
either before or after the
New Delhi
commencement of the Public
Premises
(Eviction
of
Unauthorised
Occupants)
Act, 1971 (Act 40 of 1971)
[No. 22012/2/2013-Pol.I]
S.K. Jain, Dy. Director of Estates (Policy)
Ñf"k ea=kky;
(Ñf"k ,oa lgdkfjrk foHkkx)
(jktHkk"kk izHkkx)
ubZ fnYyh] 5 vxLr] 2013
dk-vk- 1615-—dsUnzh; ljdkj] jktHkk"kk (la?k ds 'kkldh;
iz;kstuksa ds fy, iz;ksx) fu;e] 1976 ds fu;e 10 ds mi fu;e
(4) ds vuqlj.k esa Ñf"k ea=kky;] Ñf"k ,oa lgdkfjrk foHkkx ds
varxZr fuEufyf[kr iz'kklfud fu;a=k.kk/hu Lok;Ùk fudk; dks
ftlds 80% deZpkjho`Un us fgUnh dk dk;Zlk/d Kku izkIr dj
fy;k gS] vf/lwfpr djrh gS A
jk"Vªh; Ñf"k foLrkj izca/ laLFkku]
jktsUnz uxj] gSnjkckn&500030
vk¡/z izns'k
¹la- 3&3@2011&jk-Hkk- uhfrº
vkj- ch- flUgk] la;qDr lfpo
MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE
(Department of Agriculture and Cooperation)
( Official Language Division)
New Delhi, the 5th August, 2013
S.O. 1615.—In pursuance of Sub-Rule (4) of the
Rule 10 of the Official Language (Use for Official Purposes
of the Union) Rules, 1976 the Central Government hereby
notifies the following Autonomous body which is under
the administrative control of the Department of the
Agriculture & Cooperation, Ministry of Agriculture,
whereof 80% staff have acquired the working knowledge
of Hindi—
National Institute of Agricultural Extension
Management, Rajendra Nagar, Hyderabad-500030.
[ No. 3-3/2011-Official Language Policy]
R. B. SINHA, Jt. Secy.
(1)
(2)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4209
fo|qr ea=kky;
ubZ fnYyh] 29 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1616-—17&8&2006 dks vf/lwfpr eq[; oS|qr fujh{kd vkSj oS|qr fujh{kd dh vgZrk] 'kfDr vkSj dk;Z fu;ekoyh] 2006
ds lkFk ifBr fo|qr vf/fu;e] 2003 (2003 dk 36) dh /kjk 162 dh mi&/kjk (1) ds }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, dsUnz
ljdkj ,rnn~okjk Mhth,e,l ds fuEufyf[kr vf/dkfj;ksa dks bl vf/lwpuk dh rkjh[k ls Mhth,e,l esa muds dk;Zdky rd] mi;qZDr
fu;e esa mfYyf[kr vgZrk vkSj 'krZ dks iwjk djus ds v/hu [kku lqj{kk egkfuns'kky; ds fy, oS|qRk fujh{kd ds :i esa fu;qDRk djrh gS%—
Øe
uke
vgZrk
Mhth,e,l eas
ds :i esa fu;qDr
dk;ZHkkj xzg.k
la-
inuke
fd;k tkuk gS
djus dh frfFk
1
vkuUn vxzoky
oS|qRk vfHk;kaf=kdh
mi funs'kd
oS|qr fujh{kd
26&03&2012
fMxzh
[kku lqj{kk (oS|qr)
2
iqÙkkjktq lkgwdsg
&ogh&
&ogh&
&ogh&
27&03&2012
3
izdk'k oqQekj
&ogh&
&ogh&
&ogh&
26&03&2012
4
jke oqQekj
&ogh&
&ogh&
&ogh&
23&04&2012
5
pØikf.k
&ogh&
&ogh&
&ogh&
21&02&2012
ikykuheykbZ
6
fc'oukFk csgjk
&ogh&
&ogh&
&ogh&
30&01&2012
mi;qZDr mfYyf[kr vf/dkjh dsUnzh; fo|qr izkf/dj.k (lqj{kk vkSj fo|qr vkiw£r ls lacaf/r mik;) fofu;e] 2010 esa nh xbZ izfØ;k ds
vuqlkj] Mhth,e,l ds vf/dkj okys {ks=kksa esa izpkyuk/hu fo|qr dk;ks± fo|qr laLFkkiukvksa rFkk fo|qr jks¯yx LVkWd vFkok Mhth,e,l ds
fu;a=k.kk/hu@Mhth,e,l ls lacaf/r dk;ks± rFkk fo|qr laLFkkiukvksa ds laca/ esa vf/dkjksa dk iz;ksx djsaxs vkSj viuk dk;Z fu"ikfnr djsaxs vkSj
tEew ,oa d'ehj jkT; dks NksM+dj] visu lacaf/r dk;Z{ks=k dh LFkkuh; lhekvksa esa [kku ls lacaf/r fo|qr fujh{kd ds :i esa Hkh vius
vfèkdkjksa dk iz;ksx djasxs vkSj dk;Z djsaxs A
Mhth,e,l ;g lqfuf'pr djsxk fd mDr vf/dkjh mUgsa] Mhth,e,l esa mi funs'kd] [kku lqj{kk (fo|qr) ds :i esa fn;s x;s
dk;ks± ds laca/ esa og fo|qr fujh{kd ugha gksaxs A
fo|qr fujh{kd ds :i esa fu;qDr vf/dkjh og izf'k{k.k ysaxs ftls dsUnz ljdkj bl mís'; ds fy, vko';d le>s rFkk ,slk
izf'k{k.k ljdkj dh larqf"V ds Lrj rd iwjk fd;k tk,xk A
¹ iQk- la- 42@3@2013&vkj ,.M vkjº
T;ksfr vjksM+k] la;qDrk lfpo
MINISTRY OF POWER
New Delhi, the 29th July, 2013
S.O. 1616.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 162 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (36 of
2003) read with Qualification, Power and Function of Chief Electrical Inspector and Electrical Inspectors Rules, 2006
notified on 17.8.2006, the Central Government hereby appoints the following officers of DGMS, as Electrical Inspector for
Directorate General of Mine Safety, from the date of this Notification till his tenure in DGMS subject to fulfillment of the
qualification and condition mentionedoin the above Rule:—
4210
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
oL=k ea=kky;
ubZ fnYyh] 2 vxLr] 2013
dk-vk- 1617-—dsUnzh; ljdkj] la?k ds 'kkldh; iz;kstuksa
ds fy, jktHkk"kk fu;e] 1976 ds fu;e 10 ds mi fu;e 4 ds
vuqlj.k esa] oL=k ea=kky; ds varxZr vkus okys fuEufyf[kr
dk;kZy;ksa dks ftlesa 80% ls vf/d deZpkfj;ksa us fgUnh dk
dk;Zlk/d Kku izkIr dj fy;k gS] vf/lwfpr djrh gS %
1- vuqla/ku izlkj dsanz] dsjsvoizla] dsanzh; js'ke cksMZ]
ekiZQr&mifuns'kd] js'ke fodkl foHkkx] dE;qfuVh gsYFk
lsaVj] NqVeyiqj&247662 ftyk lgkjuiqj] mRrj izns'k A
2- vuqla/ku izlkj dsanz] & mi bdkbZ] dsjsvoizla] dsanzh;
js'ke cksMZ] lsDVj&21] iapdwyk&134112] gfj;k.kk A
¹la- bZ&11016@1@2011&¯gnhº
lqu;uk rksej] la;qDr lfpo
MINISTRY OF TEXTILES
New Delhi, the 2nd August, 2013
S.O. 1617.—In pursuance of Sub-Rule (4) of Rule
10 of the Official Languages (use for official purpose of
the Union) Rules, 1976 the Central Government hereby
notifies the following offices of the Ministry of Textiles,
more than 80% staff whereof have acquired the working
knowledge of Hindi.
1. Research Extension Centre, CSRTI, Central Silk
Board, C/o-Dy. Director, Resham Vikash Vibhag,
Community Health Centre, Chutmalpur-247662 Dist.
Saharanpur, Uttar Pradesh.
2. Research Extension Centre -Sub Unit, CSRTI,
Central Silk Board, Sector-21, Panchkula-134112,
Haryana.
[ No. E-11016/1/2011-Hindi]
SUNAINA TOMAR, Jt. Secy.
S. No.
Name
Qualification
Designation
To be
Date
of
in DGMS
Appointed as
Joining
1.
Anand
Degree in
Dy. Director
Electrical
26.03.2012
Agarwal
Electrical
of Mine
Inspector
Engineering
Safety (Elect.)
2.
Puttaraju
-do-
-do-
-do
27.01.2012
Sahukaiah
3.
Prakash
-do-
-do-
-do-
26.03.2012
Kumar
4.
Raj Kumar
-do-
-do-
-do-
23.04.2012
5.
Chakkarapani
-do-
-do-
-do-
21.02.2012
Palanimalai
6.
Bishwanath
-do-
-do-
-do-
30.01.2012
Behera
The above mentioned officer shall exercise the powers and perform his functions in respect of electrical works, electrical
installations and electrical rolling stock in operation within the areas occupied by the DGMS or in respect of works and
electrical installations under the control of DGMS/belonging to DGMS and shall also exercise the powers and perform
function as electrical inspector in relation to a mine, within the local limits of their respective jurisdiction except the State
of Jammu & Kashmir, as per the procedure provided in Central Electricity Authority (Measures relating to Safety and
Electricity Supply) Regulations, 2010.
DGMS will ensure that above said official shall not be the Electirical Inspector in respect of the work assigned to him as
Dy. Director of Mine Sefety (Elect.) in DGMS.
The Officials , appointed as Electrical Inspector shall undergo such training as the Central Govenrment may consider
necessary for the purpose and such training shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Government.
[F. No. 42/3/2013-R &R ]
JYOTI ARORA, Jt. Secy.
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4211
miHkksDrk ekeys] [kk| vkSj lkoZtfud forj.k ea=kky;
(miHkksDrk ekeys foHkkx)
(Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks)
ubZ fnYyh] 30 twu] 2013
dk-vk- 1618-—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks fu;e] 1987 ds fu;e 7 ds mi&fu;e (1) ds [kaM ([k) ds vuqlj.k esa
Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks ,rn~}kjk vf/lwfpr djrk gS fd uhps vuqlwph esa fn, x, ekud (dks) esas la'kks/u fd;k x;k@fd;s x;s gSa A
vuqlwph
Øe la- la'kksf/r Hkkjrh; ekud (dksa) dh
la'kks/u dh la[;k
LFkkfir frfFk
la[;k] o"kZ vkSj 'kh"kZd
vkSj frfFk
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1-
vkbZ ,l 4955% 2001 ?kjsyw /qykbZ ds
la'kks/u la[;k 3]
30 twu] 2013
fy, viektZd ikmMj&fof'kf"V
twu] 2013
(pkSFkk iqujh{k.k)
bu Hkkjrh; ekudksa dh izfr;k¡ Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks] ekud Hkou] 9] cgknqj 'kkg t+iQj ekxZ] ubZ fnYyh&110002] {ks=kh;
dk;kZy;ksa % ubZ fnYyh] dksydkrk] p.Mhx<+] psUubZ] eqEcbZ rFkk 'kk[kk dk;kZy;ksa % vgenkckn] caxykSj] Hkksiky] Hkqous'oj] dks;Ecrwj]
xqokgkVh] gSnjkckn] t;iqj] dkuiqj] ukxiqj] iVuk] iw.ks rFkk fr:ouUrkiqje esa fcØh gsrq miyC/ gSa A Hkkjrh; ekudksa dks
http://www.standardsbis.in }kjk baVjusV ij [kjhnk tk ldrk gS A
¹lanHkZ lh,pMh 25@vkbZ,l 4955º
MkW- jktho ds- >k] oSKkfud ^,iQ* ,oa izeq[k (jlk;u)
MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION
(Department of Consumer Affairs)
(BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS)
New Delhi, the 30th June, 2013
S.O. 1618.—In pursuance of clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987,
the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards, particulars of which are given
in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued :
SCHEDULE
Sl.No.
No. and Year of the
No. and year of the
Date from which
Indian Standards
amendment
the amendment
shall have effect
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1.
IS 4955 : 2001 Household
Amendment No. 3
30th June, 2013
laundry detergent powder -
June, 2013
specification ( Fourth Revision)
Copy of this Standards is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan, 9, Bahadur
Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi- 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi, Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chennai, Mumbai and
also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati, Hyderabad, Jaipur,
Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna, Pune, Thiruvananthapuram. On line purchase of Indian standard can be made
at :http://www.standardsbis.in
[Ref. CHD 25 /IS 4955]
Dr. RAJIV K. JHA, Scientist ‘F’ & Head (CHD)
4212
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ubZ fnYyh] 31 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1619-—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks fu;e] 1987 ds fu;e 7 ds mi&fu;e (1) ds [kaM ([k) ds vuqlj.k esa
Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks ,rn~}kjk vf/lwfpr djrk gS fd uhps vuqlwph esa fn, x, ekud (dks) esas la'kks/u fd;k x;k@fd;s x;s gSa A
vuqlwph
Øe la- la'kksf/r Hkkjrh; ekud (dksa) dh
la'kks/u dh la[;k
LFkkfir frfFk
la[;k] o"kZ vkSj 'kh"kZd
vkSj frfFk
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1-
vkbZ ,l 133% 2004 busey] Hkhrjh% (d)
la'kks/u la[;k ua- 1]
31 tqykbZ] 2013
v/ysiu ([k) ifjlTtk fof'kf"V
tqykbZ] 2013
(pkSFkk iqujh{k.k)
bu Hkkjrh; ekudksa dh izfr;k¡ Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks] ekud Hkou] 9] cgknqj 'kkg t+iQj ekxZ] ubZ fnYyh&110002] {ks=kh;
dk;kZy;ksa % ubZ fnYyh] dksydkrk] p.Mhx<+] psUubZ] eqEcbZ rFkk 'kk[kk dk;kZy;ksa % vgenkckn] caxykSj] Hkksiky] Hkqous'oj] dks;Ecrwj]
xqokgkVh] gSnjkckn] t;iqj] dkuiqj] ukxiqj] iVuk] iw.ks rFkk fr:ouUrkiqje esa fcØh gsrq miyC/ gSa A Hkkjrh; ekudksa dks
http://www.standardsbis.in }kjk baVjusV ij [kjhnk tk ldrk gS A
¹lanHkZ lh,pMh 20@vkbZ,l 133º
MkW- jktho ds- >k] oSKkfud ^,iQ* ,oa izeq[k (jlk;u)
New Delhi, the 31st July, 2013
S.O. 1619.—In pursuance of clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987,
the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards, particulars of which are given
in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued :
SCHEDULE
Sl.No.
No. and Year of the
No. and year of the
Date from which
Indian Standards
amendment
the amendment
shall have effect
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1.
IS 133 : 2004 Enamel, interior
Amendment No. 1
31 July, 2013
(a) Undercoating (b) Finishing
July, 2013
specification ( Fourth Revision)
Copy of this Standards is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan, 9, Bahadur
Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi- 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi, Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chennai, Mumbai and
also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati, Hyderabad, Jaipur,
Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna, Pune, Thiruvananthapuram. On line purchase of Indian standard can be made
at :http://www.standardsbis.in
[Ref. CHD 20/IS 133]
Dr. RAJIV K. JHA, Scientist ‘F’ & Head (CHD)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4213
ubZ fnYyh] 31 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1620-—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks fu;e] 1987 ds fu;e 7 ds mi&fu;e (1) ds [kaM ([k) ds vuqlj.k esa
Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks ,rn~}kjk vf/lwfpr djrk gS fd uhps vuqlwph esa fn, x, ekud (dksa) esas la'kks/u fd;k x;k@fd;s x;s gSa A
vuqlwph
Øe la- la'kksf/r Hkkjrh; ekud (dksa) dh
la'kks/u dh la[;k
LFkkfir frfFk
la[;k] o"kZ vkSj 'kh"kZd
vkSj frfFk
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1-
vkbZ ,l 101 (Hkkx 5@vuqHkkx 2)% 1988
la'kks/u la[;k 4]
31 tqykbZ] 2013
jax jksxu] okfuZ'k vkSj lacaf/r mRiknksa ds
tqykbZ] 2013
fy, uewuk vkSj ijh{k.k ds rjhds Hkkx 5
;kaf=kd ijh{k.k vuqHkkx 2 yphykiu vkSj
vklatu (rhljk iqujh{k.k)
bu Hkkjrh; ekudksa dh izfr;k¡ Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks] ekud Hkou] 9] cgknqj 'kkg t+iQj ekxZ] ubZ fnYyh&110002] {ks=kh;
dk;kZy;ksa % ubZ fnYyh] dksydkrk] p.Mhx<+] psUubZ] eqEcbZ rFkk 'kk[kk dk;kZy;ksa % vgenkckn] caxykSj] Hkksiky] Hkqous'oj] dks;Ecrwj]
xqokgkVh] gSnjkckn] t;iqj] dkuiqj] ukxiqj] iVuk] iw.ks rFkk fr:ouUrkiqje esa fcØh gsrq miyC/ gSa A Hkkjrh; ekudksa dks
http://www.standardsbis.in }kjk baVjusV ij [kjhnk tk ldrk gS A
¹lanHkZ lh,pMh 20@vkbZ,l 101(Hkkx 5@vuqHkkx 2)º
MkW- jktho ds- >k] oSKkfud ^,iQ* ,oa izeq[k (jlk;u)
New Delhi, the 31st July, 2013
S.O. 1620.—In pursuance of clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987, the
Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards, particulars of which are given in the
Schedule hereto annexed have been issued :
SCHEDULE
Sl.No.
No. and Year of the
No. and year of the
Date from which
Indian Standards
amendment
the amendment
shall have effect
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1.
IS 101(Part 5/Sec 2) : 1988
Amendment No. 4
31 July, 2013
Methods of sampling and test
July, 2013
for paints, varnishes and related
products Part 5 Mechanical
Tests Section 2 Flexibility and
Adhesion ( Third Revision)
Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan, 9, Bahadur
Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi- 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi, Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chennai, Mumbai and
also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati, Hyderabad, Jaipur,
Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna, Pune, Thiruvananthapuram. On line purchase of Indian standard can be made
at :http://www.standardsbis.in
[Ref. CHD 20 /IS 101(Part 5/Sec 2)]
Dr. RAJIV K. JHA, Scientist ‘F’ & Head (CHD)
4214
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ubZ fnYyh] 1 vxLr] 2013
dk-vk- 1621-—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks fu;e] 1987 ds fu;e 7 ds mi&fu;e (1) ds [kaM ([k) ds vuqlj.k esa
Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks ,rn~}kjk vf/lwfpr djrk gS fd ftl Hkkjrh; ekudksa dk fooj.k uhPks vuqlwph esa fn;k x;k gS os LFkkfir gks x;s gSa A
vuqlwph
Øe la- LFkkfir Hkkjrh; ekud (dksa) dh
u;s Hkkjrh; ekud }kjk
LFkkfir frfFk
la[;k] o"kZ vkSj 'kh"kZd
vfrdzfer Hkkjrh; ekud
vFkok ekudksa] ;fn dksbZ gks]
dh la[;k vkSj o"kZ
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1-
vkbZ ,l 15967 (Hkkx 1)% 2013
&
01 vxLr] 2013
ufydkdkj izfrnhfIr ySEiksa ds fy,
la/kfj=k Hkkx 1 lqj{kk visa{kk,W
bl Hkkjrh; ekud dh izfr;k¡ Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks] ekud Hkou] 9] cgknqj 'kkg t+iQj ekxZ] ubZ fnYyh&110002] {ks=kh;
dk;kZy;ksa % ubZ fnYyh] dksydkrk] p.Mhx<+] psUubZ] eqEcbZ rFkk 'kk[kk dk;kZy;ksa % vgenkckn] caxykSj] Hkksiky] Hkqous'oj] dks;Ecrwj]
xqokgkVh] gSnjkckn] t;iqj] dkuiqj] ukxiqj] iVuk] iw.ks rFkk fr:ouUrkiqje esa fcØh gsrq miyC/ gSa A
¹lanHkZ bZVh 23@Vh&90º
vkj- lh- esFk~;w oSKkfud ^,iQ* ,oa izeq[k (fo|qr rduhdh)
New Delhi, the 1st August, 2013
S.O. 1621.—In pursuance of clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987,
the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards, particulars of which are given in the Schedule
hereto annexed have been issued :
SCHEDULE
Sl. No.
No. and Year of the
No. and year of the
Date of Established
Indian Standards
Indian Standards, if
any, Superseded by
the New Indian Standard
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1.
IS 15967 (Part 1) : 2013
-
01 August, 2013
Capacitors for use in tubular fluorescent
and other discharge lamp
circuits part 1 safety
reqirements
Copies of this Standard are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan, 9, Bahadur
Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi- 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi, Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chennai, Mumbai and
also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati, Hyderabad, Jaipur,
Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna, Pune,Thiruvananthapuram.
[Ref. ET 23/T-90]
R. C. MATHEW, Scientist ‘F’ & Head (Electro tenchnical)
isVªksfy;e vkSj izkÑfrd xSl ea=ky;
ubZ fnYyh] 5 vxLr] 2013
dk-vk- 1622-—dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slk izrhr gksrk gS fd yksd fgr esa ;g vko';d gS fd floku ls cSrkyiqj rd
isVªksfy;e inkFkksZ ds ifjogu gsrq rglhy% n¢ofj¸kk] ftyk% n¢ofj¸kk] jkT;% mŸkj çn¢'k esa bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM }kjk
ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkuh pkfg, A
vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slh ikbiykbu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, vko';d izrhr gksrk gS fd ml Hkwfe esa ftlds Hkhrj
mDr ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkus dk izLrko gS vkSj tks bl vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa of.kZr gS] mi;ksx dk vtZu fd;k tk,(
vr% vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] iSVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbUl ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½ vf/kfu;e] 1962 ¼1962
dk 50½ dh /kkjk 3 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] mDr Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/akdkj dk vtZu djus ds
vius vk'k; dh ?kks’k.kk djrh gS A
dksbZ O;fDr] tks mDr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa fgrc) gS] ml rkjh[k ls ftldks] Hkkjr ds jkti= esa ;Fkk izdkf'kr bl
vf/klwpuk dh izfr;ka lk/kkj.k turk dks miyC/k djk nh tkrh gS] bDdhl fnu ds vUnj] Hkwfe ds Hkhrj ikbiykbu fcNk, tkus gsrq
mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj ds vtZu ds fy,] Jh mekdkar f«kikBh] o l{ke izkf/kdkjh bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM] ¼ikbiykbu
fMohtu½] lqcsnkjxat] iks-vks% ihiyxkWao] ftyk% bykgkckn] fiu% 211012] jkT;% mŸkj izns'k dks fyf[kr :i eas vk{ksi Hkst ldsxkA
vuqlwph
rglhy % nsofj;k
jkT; % mÙkj izns'k
ekStk@xzke
losZ@Cykd@la- @IyksV (la-)
lc&Mho&la-
{ks=Qy
gsDVs;j
vkjs
oxZ ehVj
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
dqlekSuh
203
00
00
36
rIik % dNqokj
187
00
15
95
186
00
12
71
185
00
08
87
184¼pdjksM½
00
00
63
182
00
14
70
cjwvkMhg
450¼pdjksM½
00
00
62
rIik % dNqokj
443
00
09
45
444
00
00
36
440
00
00
36
445 c
00
14
95
445 v
00
08
17
432¼pdjksM½
00
02
05
433 c
00
05
31
433 v
00
00
36
431
00
06
49
430
00
05
69
376¼pdjksM½
00
00
61
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4215
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4216
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
308
00
09
48
306 c
00
00
54
306 v
00
13
38
305
00
15
03
304
00
07
94
319
00
00
36
299
00
01
12
301
00
02
04
300
00
08
85
291
00
00
36
290¼ugj½
00
00
64
289
00
14
87
288 v
00
00
36
288 c
00
00
36
286
00
02
36
285
00
00
70
284
00
00
36
287
00
00
04
drkSjk [ktwjh
640
00
00
34
rIik % lkFkh;ko
639
00
01
58
636
00
02
21
637
00
00
36
635
00
00
36
634
00
00
36
608
00
13
74
607
00
07
13
602
00
01
19
632
00
00
36
631
00
00
36
610
00
00
42
609
00
03
41
606
00
01
19
605
00
05
95
596
00
00
28
593
00
00
36
604
00
01
86
603
00
00
36
597
00
02
72
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4217
598
00
00
36
590
00
02
20
589
00
00
36
591
00
03
44
592
00
00
24
583
00
00
36
588
00
03
33
584
00
01
49
587
00
01
22
585
00
05
39
586
00
14
61
572
00
03
39
571¼pdjksM½
00
00
61
569
00
00
36
568
00
05
65
567
00
20
69
566¼pdjksM½
00
00
65
561
00
16
37
559
00
05
11
557¼pdjksM½
00
01
82
558
00
00
36
jkmriqj
552
00
00
36
rIik % dNqokj
551c
00
02
42
550
00
04
59
549
00
04
55
548
00
08
57
547c
00
03
15
547v
00
10
94
544¼pdjksM½
00
00
90
539
00
19
36
538
00
06
71
526
00
13
28
525
00
05
76
536
00
00
36
534
00
00
36
522
00
02
55
527¼pdjksM½
00
00
91
521
00
00
36
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4218
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
529
00
07
26
528v
00
13
00
528c
00
03
85
516¼pdjksM½
00
00
63
510
00
09
18
509¼pdjksM½
00
01
11
508
00
16
25
504v
00
13
14
502¼pdjksM½
00
00
83
457
00
19
30
456
00
21
06
455
00
00
36
459¼pdjksM½
00
01
53
460
00
14
85
431
00
20
88
426¼pdjksM½
00
00
72
425
00
12
55
422
00
02
48
423
00
04
32
421
00
02
47
424
00
00
36
420
00
23
04
419¼pdjksM½
00
00
63
418¼ugj½
00
04
86
415
00
19
44
cjkMhg
45
00
22
00
rIik % dNqokj
46
00
04
25
48
00
00
38
47
00
05
40
21¼pdjksM½
00
01
89
18
00
00
63
15
00
18
63
16
00
20
07
14
00
00
44
pd cUnh mQZ eBhvk
rIik % dNqokj
79
00
00
62
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4219
78
00
07
38
77
00
09
23
76
00
13
18
75
00
04
46
26
00
00
36
35¼pdjksM½
00
01
08
31c
00
06
72
31v
00
01
20
32
00
07
29
33
00
16
61
34¼pdjksM½
00
00
36
11c
00
00
36
12c
00
00
43
12v
00
14
58
10
00
00
40
9
00
06
37
8
00
05
98
7
00
00
60
1¼pdjksM½
00
00
90
ejhikj cq>qxZ
129¼jkLrk½
00
01
22
rIik % dNqokj
132
00
08
51
131
00
04
72
134
00
10
19
130
00
00
36
135
00
00
36
136
00
07
51
137
00
18
90
140
00
06
23
141¼pdjksM½
00
00
90
142
00
05
61
144
00
09
00
145
00
05
58
146
00
02
70
110
00
16
65
111¼pdjksM½
00
00
36
109
00
05
94
105¼jkLrk½
00
00
63
35
00
07
56
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4220
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
34
00
09
00
33
00
06
84
32
00
06
39
38¼pdjksM½
00
00
63
18
00
01
84
20
00
00
36
17
00
27
03
nqckSyh
160¼pdjksM½
00
00
72
rIik % dNqokj
159
00
00
38
158
00
09
52
157v
00
07
92
155
00
02
34
153
00
05
46
154
00
01
97
151¼pdjksM½
00
00
63
150
00
06
37
123c
00
11
66
123v
00
05
31
125
00
00
40
124
00
15
57
122¼pdjksM½
00
00
63
106c
00
26
73
107
00
00
36
110
00
00
36
66¼pdjksM½
00
01
62
65
00
10
13
64
00
06
93
63
00
07
16
1¼jkLrk½
00
01
17
ljS;k
218¼jkLrk½
00
01
50
rIik % dNqokj
224c
00
00
51
224v
00
03
31
222
00
12
78
221
00
04
98
223c
00
06
08
220
00
10
69
209v
00
00
36
212
00
01
83
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4221
213
00
10
71
139¼jkLrk½
00
00
71
128
00
22
64
130
00
05
00
131
00
00
36
95¼jkLrk½
00
00
57
98
00
04
13
96¼pdjksM½
00
01
13
88
00
18
21
83c
00
05
21
81¼pdjksM½
00
01
53
75
00
01
62
76c
00
04
30
76v
00
04
41
78c
00
09
48
78v
00
09
48
74
00
02
50
79
00
07
82
69
00
05
93
67v
00
02
89
66v
00
02
17
nsofj;k ehj
158c
00
00
36
rIik % dNqokj
158v
00
07
38
1 ukyk
00
01
08
11
00
07
02
12
00
03
10
9
00
07
92
7
00
01
26
6
00
05
94
4
00
03
42
5
00
00
36
3
00
02
88
2v
00
00
36
pdjok ?kwl
367
00
17
86
rIik % dNqokj
360
00
05
04
361
00
04
25
362
00
00
36
353
00
08
40
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4222
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
352v
00
13
50
351
00
00
36
349 ¼pd jksM½
00
00
72
348
00
09
36
347c
00
04
77
347v
00
05
13
344
00
10
44
342 ¼pd jksM½
00
00
68
341
00
13
50
340
00
00
36
338 ¼pd jksM½
00
00
63
336v
00
08
10
337v
00
00
36
330
00
14
94
328c
00
01
08
328v
00
03
96
327
00
01
26
326c
00
04
86
325
00
08
10
266 ¼jksM½
00
01
26
319
00
00
36
265
00
03
24
260
00
05
76
259 ¼pd jksM½
00
00
63
258
00
00
54
256
00
12
96
255
00
14
94
ukyk
00
01
53
iMjh
73
00
00
36
rIik % dNqokj
72
00
01
35
60
00
00
81
/kVsyk xkWth
442¼ukyk½
00
02
34
rIik % dNqokj
509
00
01
36
508
00
01
84
507
00
05
22
506
00
02
61
505
00
05
76
481
00
02
18
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4223
480
00
00
36
504
00
00
72
467
00
00
63
502
00
08
28
482
00
00
36
503
00
00
36
477
00
13
14
474
00
01
80
476
00
01
54
475
00
07
02
458¼pdjksM½
00
00
90
459
00
06
68
460
00
06
70
461
00
03
78
455
00
13
32
462
00
00
33
453¼pdjksM½
00
01
98
454
00
00
36
452
00
07
13
402¼jkLrk½
00
02
63
280
00
14
22
277
00
05
71
285
00
09
54
283
00
00
54
284
00
00
36
288
00
14
02
287
00
00
55
290¼pdjksM½
00
00
90
300
00
09
50
309
00
00
36
291
00
00
36
293
00
09
72
295
00
00
39
294
00
05
22
386
00
00
36
313¼pdjksM½
00
00
54
314
00
01
00
327¼jkLrk½
00
01
26
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4224
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
385¼pdjksM½
00
00
36
384
00
08
46
383
00
07
56
382
00
11
88
380
00
00
36
379
00
11
52
378
00
04
05
355¼pdjksM½
00
01
62
343
00
15
16
345
00
05
00
344
00
05
58
140
00
00
72
cMgjk
572
00
27
59
rIik % dNqokj
549
00
02
34
548
00
00
72
547
00
02
16
546
00
09
54
545
00
00
72
540
00
13
59
541
00
00
36
542
00
00
36
539
00
07
56
538
00
00
36
166
00
09
00
164
00
07
47
156
00
00
36
157
00
05
04
155
00
00
74
158
00
10
67
160
00
05
76
159
00
05
22
161
00
00
36
jkLrk
00
04
14
143
00
15
84
142
00
03
32
141
00
05
40
140
00
09
51
135 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
54
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4225
128
00
06
55
127
00
10
26
123
00
00
63
108
00
01
34
107 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
72
106
00
19
26
105
00
00
81
102 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
54
108
00
03
25
101
00
06
48
ixjk mQZ ijfl;k
256
00
11
16
rIik % dNqokj
255¼pdjksM½
00
00
72
235
00
10
44
234
00
02
09
236
00
09
18
237
00
08
46
232
00
00
30
238¼jkLrk½
00
02
05
242
00
04
86
240
00
11
43
241
00
13
68
212¼pdjksM½
00
00
72
166
00
06
03
167
00
00
36
165
00
10
80
164
00
01
56
163
00
13
22
155
00
00
54
jkeiwj
207
00
01
45
rIik % dNqokj
206 c
00
03
65
206 v
00
14
84
205¼pdjksM½
00
00
66
200c
00
02
25
199
00
36
48
183
00
00
36
202¼pdjksM½
00
00
65
203
00
03
91
192¼pdjksM½
00
01
24
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4226
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
182v
00
07
90
182c
00
00
36
180¼pdjksM½
00
00
71
178v
00
02
50
178c
00
00
36
85
00
00
36
84
00
24
09
83
00
01
52
119c
00
00
77
82
00
00
20
81
00
00
36
77
00
00
56
dwlegk mQZ csyok
180c
00
04
54
rIik % dNqokj
180v
00
10
21
179
00
03
93
182v
00
24
93
182c
00
00
20
178 ¼ugj½
00
01
25
177¼jkLrk½
00
00
46
176
00
09
74
169¼pdjksM½
00
00
72
167
00
13
39
166¼pdjksM½
00
01
08
146
00
06
00
147
00
10
93
148
00
12
83
150
00
06
88
149
00
00
36
143¼pdjksM½
00
00
87
142
00
14
06
138
00
01
83
131¼pdjksM½
00
00
19
133
00
00
36
137v
00
06
62
139
00
00
50
137c
00
12
81
136¼pdjksM½
00
00
70
23
00
08
84
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4227
22
00
13
28
20
00
02
40
19
00
02
05
1 ¼ukyk½
00
02
22
/kukSrh [kqnZ
177¼ukyk½
00
01
29
rIik % xkSojk;
176¼ukyk½
00
01
75
174
00
03
82
169
00
06
34
168
00
08
41
167
00
07
06
165¼pdjksM½
00
00
97
164
00
06
78
163¼pdjksM½
00
01
13
162
00
08
85
161¼pdjksM½
00
00
64
160
00
08
74
155
00
02
31
126¼pdjksM½
00
00
74
91
00
01
71
90
00
00
36
92
00
16
94
86
00
04
81
93¼pdjksM½
00
02
58
125
00
01
72
82
00
32
47
81
00
22
17
34¼pdjksM½
00
02
12
7
00
18
75
12
00
00
18
11
00
19
11
8
00
00
36
9
00
01
26
10
00
08
85
25¼pdjksM½
00
01
05
eqUnsjk
25
00
05
63
rIik % xkSojk;
23
00
04
42
22
00
10
78
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4228
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
21c
00
02
08
21v
00
10
01
20¼pdjksM½
00
00
74
19c
00
00
91
19v
00
07
91
18v
00
03
26
18c
00
03
18
17 ¼jksM½
00
01
29
16c
00
12
56
16v
00
02
80
15v
00
09
21
10
00
05
33
9¼pdjksM½
00
00
61
8c
00
07
82
8v
00
00
66
7
00
05
88
iks[kj HkhaMk
173
00
00
36
rIik % xkSojk;
73
00
00
36
72
00
10
62
71
00
00
36
68
00
00
36
50-c
00
02
55
49
00
02
95
48
00
06
28
45
00
00
48
46
00
05
85
47
00
05
85
HkxkSrhiqj
72v
00
01
13
rIik % xkSojk;
72c
00
07
87
71c
00
05
22
77
00
02
52
78
00
11
34
79
00
06
43
81
00
00
36
80
00
07
47
83c
00
05
83
97¼pdjksM½
00
01
08
111
00
00
36
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4229
110
00
00
69
99
00
12
07
100
00
00
76
109c
00
00
46
101
00
04
32
106v
00
04
14
107
00
04
68
108¼pdjksM½
00
00
90
cjkjh
99
00
13
90
rIik % xkSojk;
102
00
04
32
103¼pdjksM½
00
00
63
104
00
26
82
106
00
00
36
105
00
00
36
108
00
10
57
91¼jkLrk½
00
04
75
51
00
13
23
49
00
00
36
52
00
01
75
68
00
04
83
53
00
04
23
60
00
00
36
62
00
18
54
67
00
00
36
42
00
01
05
63
00
05
22
64
00
00
51
17¼dsuky½
00
05
22
16
00
00
51
15
00
00
36
13
00
04
10
Hkheiqj
580¼ugj½
00
01
08
rIik % xkSojk;
452
00
06
88
451
00
02
34
450
00
01
01
449
00
17
06
448¼jkLrk½
00
01
80
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4230
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
xkSjk [kkl
1084
00
33
21
rIik % xksjk
1076¼pdjksM½
00
00
63
1075¼pdjksM½
00
00
76
1055
00
19
01
1058
00
00
36
1057
00
00
40
1056
00
06
41
1043
00
16
83
1042
00
00
63
1038
00
04
86
1061
00
00
36
1037
00
03
83
1029
00
00
36
1059
00
01
58
1060
00
06
03
1032¼pdjksM½
00
00
63
1061
00
00
36
1031¼pdjksM½
00
00
63
1017
00
00
36
1016
00
07
47
1026
00
00
36
1014&1102¼pdjksM½
00
00
63
1015
00
30
96
1013
00
22
50
1018¼pdjksM½
00
00
63
320¼pdjksM½
00
00
63
315
00
33
12
314¼ugj½
00
01
35
313
00
10
08
226¼pdjksM½
00
01
44
311
00
00
36
310
00
00
36
225¼pdjksM½
00
01
44
210
00
12
78
212
00
20
38
211
00
00
36
213
00
07
79
214
00
10
04
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4231
216¼pdjksM½
00
00
63
224
00
05
31
223
00
04
90
222
00
00
70
221
00
00
80
220
00
01
50
218
00
09
90
145¼pdjksM½
00
00
63
144¼pdjksM½
00
00
63
136
00
00
54
133
00
15
66
132¼pdjksM½
00
02
10
123
00
00
45
125
00
00
39
126
00
00
57
128
00
02
35
129
00
04
80
130
00
00
36
131
00
04
68
104¼pdjksM½
00
00
63
103
00
16
92
97¼ukyk½
00
00
99
iks[kj HkhaMk
224
00
15
41
rIik % xksjk
193 ¼ugj½
00
00
72
190c
00
00
81
190v
00
00
36
ijlk cjok
496
00
00
71
rIik % xksjk
495
00
00
45
421
00
00
58
422
00
04
35
423
00
04
91
424
00
04
37
420
00
19
98
419
00
02
96
416
00
22
93
412
00
04
41
402
00
01
76
406
00
00
89
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4232
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
408
00
00
90
407
00
04
59
395
00
15
08
389
00
00
90
154
00
01
41
155
00
02
82
157
00
00
72
156
00
16
38
152
00
01
44
151
00
00
54
150
00
12
78
149
00
04
90
148
00
04
46
147
00
04
23
145
00
07
45
146
00
05
78
143
00
00
67
129
00
26
75
110
00
01
80
5
00
23
12
6
00
05
67
4
00
03
43
3
00
12
42
7
00
00
36
1
00
00
81
tSriqjk
153v
00
06
62
rIik % iub
153c
00
03
06
147
00
03
15
152
00
02
12
148
00
02
34
149
00
03
35
150
00
04
60
144¼pdjksM½
00
00
36
142
00
02
14
141
00
00
40
134
00
08
85
135
00
00
24
132
00
05
98
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4233
62¼ukyk½
00
00
36
1¼ukyk½
00
03
29
eqUMsjk
1¼ukyk½
00
03
60
rIik % ?krqjk
13
00
11
02
2
00
00
74
11
00
04
19
10
00
03
46
6
00
03
65
9
00
01
11
7
00
06
72
8
00
02
16
4
00
06
19
3 ¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
01
17
clalikj cq>qxZ
69¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
01
98
rIik % ?krqjk
54
00
00
36
55
00
00
36
56
00
00
36
57
00
00
36
58
00
00
36
59
00
00
37
61
00
19
35
60
00
00
53
48¼pdjksM½
00
00
63
46
00
11
34
45¼pdjksM½
00
00
63
39
00
12
37
38
00
04
95
36¼pdjksM½
00
01
20
31
00
09
72
30
00
14
81
25
00
13
86
23¼pdjksM½
00
00
54
9
00
17
32
5
00
05
58
10
00
00
36
4¼pdjksM½
00
00
63
3
00
16
06
cjkjh
435
00
10
40
rIik % ?krqjk
433
00
25
02
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4234
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
432¼pdjksM½
00
00
32
431
00
00
95
413¼pdjksM½
00
01
03
398
00
00
61
402¼pdjksM½
00
00
28
412
00
25
07
407
00
00
36
411
00
10
67
410¼pdjksM½
00
00
38
409
00
00
54
464¼pdjksM½
00
00
63
465
00
09
85
466
00
02
45
467
00
09
76
468¼pdjksM½
00
00
63
469
00
05
94
381¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
01
22
380¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
01
66
347
00
02
79
328¼jkLrk½
00
02
70
245
00
23
08
246
00
05
69
317
00
00
36
316
00
09
41
334¼ugj½
00
04
25
362
00
00
36
373
00
11
90
374
00
00
36
375¼jkLrk½
00
01
66
195
00
21
08
199¼pdjksM½
00
00
63
200
00
15
48
236¼pdjksM½
00
00
63
227
00
00
64
222
00
03
50
219
00
14
22
228
00
04
05
218
00
04
03
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4235
205 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
63
35
00
26
46
24 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
36
36
00
34
17
54 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
63
41
00
10
39
40
00
05
08
xqMjh
287
00
21
58
rIik % fljtke
288
00
38
03
331
00
00
36
305
00
29
75
304
00
06
03
302
00
00
63
145
00
06
89
144
00
05
04
142
00
01
08
141
00
04
37
140
00
11
93
138
00
08
01
137
00
08
01
153
00
00
36
156
00
00
63
160
00
19
58
159
00
01
88
158
00
02
08
247¼pdjksM½
00
00
63
248
00
03
60
249
00
04
41
250
00
08
87
251
00
09
72
253
00
05
85
252
00
03
80
254
00
00
76
256¼jkLrk½
00
00
81
255
00
00
36
60
00
08
64
61
00
09
95
62
00
08
71
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4236
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
63¼pdjksM½
00
00
65
64
00
13
54
65
00
06
48
67
00
03
96
66
00
06
16
72¼pdjksM½
00
00
63
90
00
05
75
89
00
04
18
88
00
08
19
94¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
00
65
112
00
01
44
111
00
07
97
110
00
00
36
114
00
24
52
109
00
00
36
115¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
00
90
cSryiqj
290
00
10
84
rIik % fljtke
291
00
00
36
318
00
00
36
292¼pdjksM½
00
00
63
293
00
02
56
298
00
20
81
300¼pdjksM½
00
00
63
305
00
13
32
307
00
13
37
306
00
00
36
308
00
05
94
315
00
01
26
161
00
06
53
164
00
00
36
162
00
16
20
163
00
00
36
135
00
02
16
27
00
02
25
41
00
02
12
42
00
10
30
87
00
00
63
86
00
02
92
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4237
89
00
00
36
88
00
00
36
¹iQk- la- vkj&25011@23@2013&vksvkj&Iº
iou oqQekj] voj lfpo
MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS
New Delhi, the 5th August, 2013
S.O. 1622.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that
a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited in Tehsil: Bhatpar Rani, District: Deoria in the State
of Uttar Pradesh for 'Siwan to Baitalpur Pipeline' for the transportation of Petroleum Product;
And, whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is
necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which
is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and
Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby
declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the
date on which the copies of the notification issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published
in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of
user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land, to Shri Umakant Tripathi Competent Authority, Indian Oil
Corporation Limited. (Pipelines Division), Subedargunj, P.O: Pipalgaon, District: Allahabad, Pin - 211012, State: Uttar
Pradesh.
SCHEDULE
Tehsil : Deoria
Dist : Deoria
State : Uttar Pradesh
Mouja / Village
Survey/Block. No.
Sub-Div-No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
KUSMAUNI
203
00
00
36
Tappa :-
187
00
15
95
Kachuvar
186
00
12
71
185
00
08
87
184 (Chak Road)
00
00
63
182
00
14
70
Baruadih
450 (Chak Road)
00
00
62
Tappa :-
443
00
09
45
Kachuvar
444
00
00
36
440
00
00
36
445B
00
14
95
445A
00
08
17
432 (Chak Road)
00
02
05
433B
00
05
31
433A
00
00
36
431
00
06
49
430
00
05
69
376 (Chak Road)
00
00
61
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4238
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
308
00
09
48
306B
00
00
54
306A
00
13
38
305
00
15
03
304
00
07
94
319
00
00
36
299
00
01
12
301
00
02
04
300
00
08
85
291
00
00
36
290 (Canal)
00
00
64
289
00
14
87
288A
00
00
36
288B
00
00
36
286
00
02
36
285
00
00
70
284
00
00
36
287
00
00
04
KATOURA KHAJURI
640
00
00
34
Tappa :—
639
00
01
58
Sathiyav
636
00
02
21
637
00
00
36
635
00
00
36
634
00
00
36
608
00
13
74
607
00
07
13
602
00
01
19
632
00
00
36
631
00
00
36
610
00
00
42
609
00
03
41
606
00
01
19
605
00
05
95
596
00
00
28
593
00
00
36
604
00
01
86
603
00
00
36
597
00
02
72
598
00
00
36
590
00
02
20
589
00
00
36
591
00
03
44
592
00
00
24
583
00
00
36
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4239
588
00
03
33
584
00
01
49
587
00
01
22
585
00
05
39
586
00
14
61
572
00
03
39
571(Chak Road)
00
00
61
569
00
00
36
568
00
05
65
567
00
20
69
566(Chak Road)
00
00
65
561
00
16
37
559
00
05
11
557(Chak Road)
00
01
82
558
00
00
36
RAUTPUR
552
00
00
36
Tappa :-
551-B
00
02
42
Kachuvar
550
00
04
59
549
00
04
55
548
00
08
57
547-B
00
03
15
547-A
00
10
94
544(Chak Road)
00
00
90
539
00
19
36
538
00
06
71
526
00
13
28
525
00
05
76
536
00
00
36
534
00
00
36
522
00
02
55
527(Chak Road)
00
00
91
521
00
00
36
529
00
07
26
528-A
00
13
00
528-B
00
03
85
516(Chak Road)
00
00
63
510
00
09
18
509(Chak Road)
00
01
11
508
00
16
25
504-A
00
13
14
502(Chak Road)
00
00
83
457
00
19
30
456
00
21
06
455
00
00
36
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4240
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
459(Chak Road)
00
01
53
460
00
14
85
431
00
20
88
426(Chak Road)
00
00
72
425
00
12
55
422
00
02
48
423
00
04
32
421
00
02
47
424
00
00
36
420
00
23
04
419(Chak Road)
00
00
63
418(Canal)
00
04
86
415
00
19
44
BARADIH
45
00
22
00
Tappa :-
46
00
04
25
Kachuvar
48
00
00
38
47
00
05
40
21(Chak Road)
00
01
89
18
00
00
63
15
00
18
63
16
00
20
07
14
00
00
44
CHAK BANDI URF
79
00
00
62
MATHIA
78
00
07
38
77
00
09
23
76
00
13
18
Tappa :-
75
00
04
46
Kachuvar
26
00
00
36
35(Chak Road)
00
01
08
31-B
00
06
72
31-A
00
01
20
32
00
07
29
33
00
16
61
34(Chak Road)
00
00
36
11-B
00
00
36
12-B
00
00
43
12-A
00
14
58
10
00
00
40
9
00
06
37
8
00
05
98
7
00
00
60
1(Chak Road)
00
00
90
MARIPAR BUZURG
129(BRICK Road)
00
01
22
Tappa :-
132
00
08
51
Kachuvar
131
00
04
72
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4241
134
00
10
19
130
00
00
36
135
00
00
36
136
00
07
51
137
00
18
90
140
00
06
23
141(Chak Road)
00
00
90
142
00
05
61
144
00
09
00
145
00
05
58
146
00
02
70
110
00
16
65
111(Chak Road)
00
00
36
109
00
05
94
105(Road)
00
00
63
35
00
07
56
34
00
09
00
33
00
06
84
32
00
06
39
38(Chak Road)
00
00
63
18
00
01
84
20
00
00
36
17
00
27
03
DUBAULI
160(Chak Road)
00
00
72
Tappa :-
159
00
00
38
Kachuvar
158
00
09
52
157-A
00
07
92
155
00
02
34
153
00
05
46
154
00
01
97
151(Chak Road)
00
00
63
150
00
06
37
123-B
00
11
66
123-A
00
05
31
125
00
00
40
124
00
15
57
122(Chak Road)
00
00
63
106-B
00
26
73
107
00
00
36
110
00
00
36
66(Chak Road)
00
01
62
65
00
10
13
64
00
06
93
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4242
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
63
00
07
16
1(Road)
00
01
17
SARIA
218(Road)
00
01
50
Tappa :-
224B
00
00
51
Kachuvar
224A
00
03
31
222
00
12
78
221
00
04
98
223-B
00
06
08
220
00
10
69
209-A
00
00
36
212
00
01
83
213
00
10
71
139(Road)
00
00
71
128
00
22
64
130
00
05
00
131
00
00
36
95(Road)
00
00
57
98
00
04
13
96(Chak Road)
00
01
13
88
00
18
21
83B
00
05
21
81(Chak Road)
00
01
53
75
00
01
62
76-B
00
04
30
76-A
00
04
41
78 B
00
09
48
78 A
00
09
48
74
00
02
50
79
00
07
82
69
00
05
93
67-A
00
02
89
66-A
00
02
17
Deoria Mir
158B
00
00
36
Tappa :-
158A
00
07
38
Kachuvar
1(Nala)
00
01
08
11
00
07
02
12
00
03
10
9
00
07
92
7
00
01
26
6
00
05
94
4
00
03
42
5
00
00
36
3
00
02
88
2A
00
00
36
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4243
Chakrawa
367
00
17
86
Dhus
360
00
05
04
Tappa :-
361
00
04
25
Kachuvar
362
00
00
36
353
00
08
40
352A
00
13
50
351
00
00
36
349(Chak Road)
00
00
72
348
00
09
36
347B
00
04
77
347A
00
05
13
344
00
10
44
342(Chak Road)
00
00
68
341
00
13
50
340
00
00
36
338(Chak Road)
00
00
63
336A
00
08
10
337A
00
00
36
330
00
14
94
328B
00
01
08
328A
00
03
96
327
00
01
26
326B
00
04
86
325
00
08
10
266(Road)
00
01
26
319
00
00
36
265
00
03
24
260
00
05
76
259(Chak Road)
00
00
63
258
00
00
54
256
00
12
96
255
00
14
94
Nala
00
01
53
Padari
73
00
00
36
Tappa :-
72
00
01
35
Kachuvar
60
00
00
81
GHATAILA GAZI
442(Nala)
00
02
34
Tappa :-
509
00
01
36
Kachuvar
508
00
01
84
507
00
05
22
506
00
02
61
505
00
05
76
481
00
02
18
480
00
00
36
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4244
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
504
00
00
72
467
00
00
63
502
00
08
28
482
00
00
36
503
00
00
36
477
00
13
14
474
00
01
80
476
00
01
54
475
00
07
02
458(Chak Road)
00
00
90
459
00
06
68
460
00
06
70
461
00
03
78
455
00
13
32
462
00
00
33
453(Chak Road)
00
01
98
454
00
00
36
452
00
07
13
402(Road)
00
02
63
280
00
14
22
277
00
05
71
285
00
09
54
283
00
00
54
284
00
00
36
288
00
14
02
287
00
00
55
290(Chak Road)
00
00
90
300
00
09
50
309
00
00
36
291
00
00
36
293
00
09
72
295
00
00
39
294
00
05
22
386
00
00
36
313(Chak Road)
00
00
54
314
00
01
00
327( Road)
00
01
26
385(Chak Road)
00
00
36
384
00
08
46
383
00
07
56
382
00
11
88
380
00
00
36
379
00
11
52
378
00
04
05
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4245
355(Chak Road)
00
01
62
343
00
15
16
345
00
05
00
344
00
05
58
140
00
00
72
BADAHARA
572
00
27
59
Tappa :—
549
00
02
34
Kachuvar
548
00
00
72
547
00
02
16
546
00
09
54
545
00
00
72
540
00
13
59
541
00
00
36
542
00
00
36
539
00
07
56
538
00
00
36
166
00
09
00
164
00
07
47
156
00
00
36
157
00
05
04
155
00
00
74
158
00
10
67
160
00
05
76
159
00
05
22
161
00
00
36
Road
00
04
14
143
00
15
84
142
00
03
32
141
00
05
40
140
00
09
51
135(Chak Road)
00
00
54
128
00
06
55
127
00
10
26
123
00
00
63
108
00
01
34
107(Chak Road)
00
00
72
106
00
19
26
105
00
00
81
102(Chak Road)
00
00
54
108
00
03
25
101
00
06
48
PAGARA Urf PARASIA
256
00
11
16
Tappa :—
255(Chak Road)
00
00
72
Kachuvar
235
00
10
44
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4246
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
234
00
02
09
236
00
09
18
237
00
08
46
232
00
00
30
238(Cart Track)
00
02
05
242
00
04
86
240
00
11
43
241
00
13
68
212(Chak Road)
00
00
72
166
00
06
03
167
00
00
36
165
00
10
80
164
00
01
56
163
00
13
22
155
00
00
54
RAMPUR
207
00
01
45
Tappa :-
206B
00
03
65
Kachuvar
206A
00
14
84
205(Chak Road)
00
00
66
200B
00
02
25
199
00
36
48
183
00
00
36
202(Chak Road)
00
00
65
203
00
03
91
192(Chak Road)
00
01
24
182A
00
07
90
182B
00
00
36
180(Chak Road)
00
00
71
178A
00
02
50
178B
00
00
36
85
00
00
36
84
00
24
09
83
00
01
52
119B
00
00
77
82
00
00
20
81
00
00
36
77
00
00
56
KUSMAHA URF BELWA
180B
00
04
54
Tappa :-
180A
00
10
21
Kachuvar
179
00
03
93
182A
00
24
93
182B
00
00
20
178(Canal)
00
01
25
177(Road)
00
00
46
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4247
176
00
09
74
169(Chak Road)
00
00
72
167
00
13
39
166(Chak Road)
00
01
08
146
00
06
00
147
00
10
93
148
00
12
83
150
00
06
88
149
00
00
36
143(Chak Road)
00
00
87
142
00
14
06
138
00
01
83
131(Road)
00
00
19
133
00
00
36
137A
00
06
62
139
00
00
50
137B
00
12
81
136(Chak Road)
00
00
70
23
00
08
84
22
00
13
28
20
00
02
40
19
00
02
05
1(Nala)
00
02
22
DHANAUTI KHURD
177(Nala)
00
01
29
Tappa :—
176(Nala)
00
01
75
Govrai
174
00
03
82
169
00
06
34
168
00
08
41
167
00
07
06
165(Chak Road)
00
00
97
164
00
06
78
163(Chak Road)
00
01
13
162
00
08
85
161(Chak Road)
00
00
64
160
00
08
74
155
00
02
31
126(Chak Road)
00
00
74
91
00
01
71
90
00
00
36
92
00
16
94
86
00
04
81
93(Chak Road)
00
02
58
125
00
01
72
82
00
32
47
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4248
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
81
00
22
17
34(Road)
00
02
12
7
00
18
75
12
00
00
18
11
00
19
11
8
00
00
36
9
00
01
26
10
00
08
85
25(Chak Road)
00
01
05
MUNDERA
25
00
05
63
Tappa :-
23
00
04
42
Govrai
22
00
10
78
21B
00
02
08
21A
00
10
01
20(Chak Road)
00
00
74
19B
00
00
91
19A
00
07
91
18A
00
03
26
18B
00
03
18
17(Road)
00
01
29
16B
00
12
56
16A
00
02
80
15A
00
09
21
10
00
05
33
9(Chak Road)
00
00
61
8B
00
07
82
8A
00
00
66
7
00
05
88
POKHAR BHINDA
173
00
00
36
Tappa :—
73
00
00
36
Govrai
72
00
10
62
71
00
00
36
68
00
00
36
50/3
00
02
55
49
00
02
95
48
00
06
28
45
00
00
48
46
00
05
85
47
00
05
85
BHAGAUTIPUR
72-A
00
01
13
Tappa :—
72-B
00
07
87
Govrai
71-B
00
05
22
77
00
02
52
78
00
11
34
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4249
79
00
06
43
81
00
00
36
80
00
07
47
83-B
00
05
83
97(Chak Road)
00
01
08
111
00
00
36
110
00
00
69
99
00
12
07
100
00
00
76
109-B
00
00
46
101
00
04
32
106-A
00
04
14
107
00
04
68
108(Chak Road)
00
00
90
BARARI
99
00
13
90
Tappa :-
102
00
04
32
Govrai
103(Chak Road)
00
00
63
104
00
26
82
106
00
00
36
105
00
00
36
108
00
10
57
91(Road)
00
04
75
51
00
13
23
49
00
00
36
52
00
01
75
68
00
04
83
53
00
04
23
60
00
00
36
62
00
18
54
67
00
00
36
42
00
01
05
63
00
05
22
64
00
00
51
17(Canal)
00
05
22
16
00
00
51
15
00
00
36
13
00
04
10
BHEEMPUR
580(Canal)
00
01
08
Tappa :-
452
00
06
88
Govrai
451
00
02
34
450
00
01
01
449
00
17
06
448(Road)
00
01
80
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4250
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
GAURA KHAS
1084
00
33
21
Tappa :-
1076(Chak Road)
00
00
63
Gora
1075(Chak Road)
00
00
76
1055
00
19
01
1058
00
00
36
1057
00
00
40
1056
00
06
41
1043
00
16
83
1042
00
00
63
1038
00
04
86
1061
00
00
36
1037
00
03
83
1029
00
00
36
1059
00
01
58
1060
00
06
03
1032(Chak Road)
00
00
63
1061
00
00
36
1031(Chak Road)
00
00
63
1017
00
00
36
1016
00
07
47
1026
00
00
36
1014-1102(Chak Road)
00
00
63
1015
00
30
96
1013
00
22
50
1018(Chak Road)
00
00
63
320(Chak Road)
00
00
63
315
00
33
12
314(Canal)
00
01
35
313
00
10
08
226(Chak Road)
00
01
44
311
00
00
36
310
00
00
36
225(Chak Road)
00
01
44
210
00
12
78
212
00
20
38
211
00
00
36
213
00
07
79
214
00
10
04
216(Chak Road)
00
00
63
224
00
05
31
223
00
04
90
222
00
00
70
221
00
00
80
220
00
01
50
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4251
218
00
09
90
145(Chak Road)
00
00
63
144(Chak Road)
00
00
63
136
00
00
54
133
00
15
66
132(Chak Road)
00
02
10
123
00
00
45
125
00
00
39
126
00
00
57
128
00
02
35
129
00
04
80
130
00
00
36
131
00
04
68
104(Chak Road)
00
00
63
103
00
16
92
97(Nala)
00
00
99
POKHAR BHINDA
224
00
15
41
Tappa :-
193 (Field Channel)
00
00
72
Gora
190/B
00
00
81
190/A
00
00
36
PARSA BARWA
496
00
00
71
Tappa :-Gora
495
00
00
45
421
00
00
58
422
00
04
35
423
00
04
91
424
00
04
37
420
00
19
98
419
00
02
96
416
00
22
93
412
00
04
41
402
00
01
76
406
00
00
89
408
00
00
90
407
00
04
59
395
00
15
08
389
00
00
90
154
00
01
41
155
00
02
82
157
00
00
72
156
00
16
38
152
00
01
44
151
00
00
54
150
00
12
78
149
00
04
90
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4252
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
148
00
04
46
147
00
04
23
145
00
07
45
146
00
05
78
143
00
00
67
129
00
26
75
110
00
01
80
5
00
23
12
6
00
05
67
4
00
03
43
3
00
12
42
7
00
00
36
1
00
00
81
JAITPURA
153 A
00
06
62
Tappa :-Panai
153 B
00
03
06
147
00
03
15
152
00
02
12
148
00
02
34
149
00
03
35
150
00
04
60
144(Chak Road)
00
00
36
142
00
02
14
141
00
00
40
134
00
08
85
135
00
00
24
132
00
05
98
62(Nala)
00
00
36
1(Nala)
00
03
29
MUNDERA
1(Nala)
00
03
60
Tappa :-
13
00
11
02
Dhatura
2
00
00
74
11
00
04
19
10
00
03
46
6
00
03
65
9
00
01
11
7
00
06
72
8
00
02
16
4
00
06
19
3 (Cart Track)
00
01
17
BASNSPAR
69(Cart Track)
00
01
98
BUZURG
54
00
00
36
Tappa :-
55
00
00
36
Dhatura
56
00
00
36
57
00
00
36
58
00
00
36
59
00
00
37
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4253
61
00
19
35
60
00
00
53
48(Chak Road)
00
00
63
46
00
11
34
45(Chak Road)
00
00
63
39
00
12
37
38
00
04
95
36(Chak Road)
00
01
20
31
00
09
72
30
00
14
81
25
00
13
86
23(Chak Road)
00
00
54
9
00
17
32
5
00
05
58
10
00
00
36
4(Chak Road)
00
00
63
3
00
16
06
BARARI
435
00
10
40
Tappa :-
433
00
25
02
Dhatura
432(Chak Road)
00
00
32
431
00
00
95
413(Chak Road)
00
01
03
398
00
00
61
402(Chak Road)
00
00
28
412
00
25
07
407
00
00
36
411
00
10
67
410(Chak Road)
00
00
38
409
00
00
54
464(Chak Road)
00
00
63
465
00
09
85
466
00
02
45
467
00
09
76
468(Chak Road)
00
00
63
469
00
05
94
381(Cart Track)
00
01
22
380(Cart Track)
00
01
66
347
00
02
79
328 (Road)
00
02
70
245
00
23
08
246
00
05
69
247 (Chak Road)
00
00
63
248
00
03
60
249
00
04
41
250
00
08
87
251
00
09
72
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4254
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
253
00
05
85
252
00
03
80
254
00
00
76
256(Road)
00
00
81
255
00
00
36
60
00
08
64
61
00
09
95
62
00
08
71
63(Chak Road)
00
00
65
64
00
13
54
65
00
06
48
67
00
03
96
66
00
06
16
72(Chak Road)
00
00
63
90
00
05
75
89
00
04
18
88
00
08
19
94(Cart Track)
00
00
65
112
00
01
44
111
00
07
97
110
00
00
36
114
00
24
52
109
00
00
36
115(Cart Track)
00
00
90
BAITALPUR
290
00
10
84
Tappa :-
291
00
00
36
Sirjam
318
00
00
36
292(Chak Road)
00
00
63
293
00
02
56
298
00
20
81
300(Chak Road)
00
00
63
305
00
13
32
307
00
13
37
306
00
00
36
308
00
05
94
315
00
01
26
317
00
00
36
316
00
09
41
334(Canal)
00
04
25
362
00
00
36
373
00
11
90
374
00
00
36
375(Road)
00
01
66
195
00
21
08
199(Chak Road)
00
00
63
200
00
15
48
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4255
236(Chak Road)
00
00
63
227
00
00
64
222
00
03
50
219
00
14
22
228
00
04
05
218
00
04
03
205(Chak Road)
00
00
63
35
00
26
46
24(Chak Road)
00
00
36
36
00
34
17
54(Chak Road)
00
00
63
41
00
10
39
40
00
05
08
GUDRI
287
00
21
58
Tappa :-
288
00
38
03
Sirjam
331
00
00
36
305
00
29
75
304
00
06
03
302
00
00
63
145
00
06
89
144
00
05
04
142
00
01
08
141
00
04
37
140
00
11
93
138
00
08
01
137
00
08
01
153
00
00
36
156
00
00
63
160
00
19
58
159
00
01
88
158
00
02
08
161
00
06
53
164
00
00
36
162
00
16
20
163
00
00
36
135
00
02
16
27
00
02
25
41
00
02
12
42
00
10
30
87
00
00
63
86
00
02
92
89
00
00
36
88
00
00
36
[F. No. R-25011/23/2013-OR-I]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
ubZ fnYyh] 5 vxLr] 2013
dk-vk- 1623-—dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slk izrhr gksrk gS fd yksd fgr esa ;g vko“;d gS fd floku ls cSrkyiqj rd
isVªksfy;e inkFkkasZ ds ifjogu gsrq rglhy % ÒkVij jkuh] ftyk % n¢ofj¸kk] jkT;% mŸkj çn¢“k esa bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs“ku fyfeVsM }kjk
ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkuh pkfg, A
vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slh ikbiykbu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, vko“;d izrhr gksrk gS fd ml Hkwfe esa ftlds Hkhrj
mDr ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkus dk izLrko gS vkSj tks bl vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa of.kZr gS] mi;ksx dk vtZu fd;k tk,(
vr% vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] iSVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbUl ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½ vf/kfu;e] 1962 ¼1962
dk 50½ dh /kkjk 3 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk iznÙk “kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] mDr Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/akdkj dk vtZu djus ds vius
vk“k; dh ?kks’k.kk djrh gS(
dksbZ O;fDr] tks mDr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa fgrc) gS] ml rkjh[k ls ftldks] Hkkjr ds jkti= esa ;Fkk izdkf“kr bl
vf/klwpuk dh izfr;ka lk/kkj.k turk dks miyC/k djk nh tkrh gSa] bDdhl fnu ds vUnj] Hkwfe ds Hkhrj ikbiykbu fcNk, tkus gsrq
mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj ds vtZu ds fy,] Jh mekdkar f«kikBh] l{ke izkf/kdkjh bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs“ku fyfeVsM] ¼ikbiykbu fMohtu½]
lqcsnkjxat] iks-vks % ihiyxkWao] ftyk % bykgkckn] fiu % 211012] jkT;% mŸkj izns“k dks fyf[kr :i eas vk{ksi Hkst ldsxkA
vuqlwph
rglhy % HkkVij jkuh
ftyk nsofj;k
jkT; % mÙkj izns'k
ekStk@xzke
losZ@Cykd@la- (IyksV la-)
lc&Mho&la-
{ks=kiQy
gsDVs;j
vkjs
oxZ ehVj
1
2
3
4
5
6
cudVk frjlsu
43
00
04
14
¼cudVk fNrjlsu½
42
00
00
36
rIik % cyhoku
41
00
00
36
44
00
01
44
52 ¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
00
90
36
00
10
26
35
00
00
36
37
00
05
58
38
00
12
60
39
00
06
30
cudVk txnh“k
395
00
01
31
rIik % cyhoku
391
00
10
44
392
00
00
36
390¼pd ekxZ½
00
01
08
389
00
09
72
387
00
00
36
386
00
00
57
327¼jkLrk½
00
04
14
308
00
00
36
4256
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4257
309
00
01
80
310
00
07
56
311
00
04
32
313
00
04
14
312¼pd ekxZ½
00
01
08
297
00
15
66
296
00
12
96
279
00
03
24
280
00
14
04
281
00
05
76
282
00
00
36
283
00
00
36
215¼pd ekxZ½
00
01
08
240
00
11
34
237¼pd ekxZ½
00
00
20
236
00
07
02
235
00
05
04
233
00
02
52
231
00
02
34
230
00
03
78
229¼pd ekxZ½
00
00
72
227
00
00
66
228
00
06
12
225
00
05
58
224
00
00
36
223¼pd ekxZ½
00
00
72
220
00
08
82
218
00
00
36
219
00
08
46
121¼pd ekxZ½
00
00
54
120¼jkLrk½
00
00
72
24
00
05
22
23
00
00
36
25
00
00
70
26
00
00
36
27
00
00
36
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4258
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
22
00
05
40
19
00
05
04
17
00
05
22
18
00
05
58
115
00
00
36
39
00
00
36
29¼ukyk½
00
02
34
16
00
00
36
15
00
00
36
37
00
00
69
36
00
01
80
35
00
04
68
34
00
06
48
33
00
06
30
32
00
04
14
30
00
04
50
10
00
05
94
11¼jkLrk½
00
01
98
HkFkgh lsod pd
415¼jkLrk½
00
01
58
rIik % cyhoku
399
00
04
16
398
00
08
60
396
00
01
70
397
00
18
18
386
00
08
95
387
00
00
81
385
00
10
85
383¼jkLrk½
00
02
83
277
00
02
20
276
00
07
31
275
00
10
84
274
00
02
20
272
00
06
16
273
00
01
19
271
00
02
37
278¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
01
39
284
00
01
19
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4259
283
00
02
39
282
00
01
19
281
00
08
77
279
00
08
73
269
00
01
19
267
00
05
08
265
00
01
19
266¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
02
21
225¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
01
19
30
00
13
16
24¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
01
55
22
00
04
32
29
00
01
19
21
00
00
81
20
00
10
93
19
00
06
39
18
00
08
42
17
00
10
85
16¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
04
37
HkkFkjgh tehu
43
00
00
36
rIik % cyhoku
42
00
00
36
38
00
04
40
37
00
08
59
34
00
00
36
36
00
01
01
35
00
03
20
33
00
00
36
14
00
08
28
12
00
14
35
11
00
00
36
9
00
01
40
bUnjok
47¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
03
28
rIik % cyhoku
45
00
16
02
46
00
04
05
fd'kksjh Nkij
328
00
13
13
rIik % cyhoku
325
00
03
15
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4260
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
320
00
01
22
321¼pd ekxZ½
00
03
20
324
00
02
70
322
00
08
34
319
00
05
13
318¼pd ekxZ½
00
00
65
313
00
00
36
314
00
17
54
315
00
01
20
308¼pd ekxZ½
00
01
01
303
00
22
34
302
00
10
47
301
00
01
17
300
00
03
14
299
00
06
98
jrfl;k
942
00
00
36
rIik % cyhoku
941
00
02
77
940
00
04
32
939
00
00
36
936¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
01
98
935
00
08
82
934
00
10
48
932¼pd ekxZ½
00
01
08
916
00
24
14
915
00
01
82
914
00
00
55
910
00
01
26
879¼ukyk½
00
02
47
911
00
01
36
856
00
00
36
857
00
03
51
871
00
01
26
867¼pd ekxZ½
00
00
61
863
00
05
28
864
00
05
83
865
00
07
04
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4261
866
00
00
68
862¼pd ekxZ½
00
01
12
861
00
17
51
860
00
00
63
821¼jkLrk½
00
03
06
820
00
20
59
809
00
00
36
814¼pd ekxZ½
00
02
34
713
00
11
47
726¼pd ekxZ½
00
01
08
727
00
04
43
728
00
05
40
729
00
10
53
730
00
06
66
731
00
04
88
732
00
05
83
733
00
05
85
735
00
07
54
736
00
03
33
753¼pd ekxZ½
00
00
90
754¼pd ekxZ½
00
00
90
777
00
00
36
776
00
00
56
775
00
06
32
773
00
04
97
772¼pd ekxZ½
00
00
63
771
00
10
98
770
00
04
21
769
00
05
26
768¼pd ekxZ½
00
01
19
767
00
05
76
764
00
04
82
763
00
02
76
idfM;k dqaM
243
00
06
59
rIik % cyhoku
220
00
02
16
151
00
00
14
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4262
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
150
00
00
36
152
00
01
66
153
00
03
31
154
00
02
74
168¼pd ekxZ½
00
00
90
169
00
04
55
170
00
03
24
171
00
03
38
172
00
03
53
173
00
03
46
176¼pd ekxZ½
00
00
90
177
00
02
81
178
00
04
05
186
00
12
64
188
00
04
81
189
00
06
05
194
00
00
36
195
00
02
15
196
00
04
97
197
00
02
60
199
00
00
36
204¼pd ekxZ½
00
00
44
201
00
02
35
206
00
00
36
200
00
23
62
100¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
00
90
25
00
05
63
22
00
04
59
21
00
06
80
20
00
03
08
18
00
03
49
17
00
02
16
16
00
01
50
15
00
00
36
fldfV;k uk;d
1029¼jkLrk½
00
02
79
rIik % cyhoku
1088
00
03
87
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4263
1087
00
06
03
1086
00
07
33
1084
00
06
52
1083
00
06
62
1082
00
00
36
1081
00
00
36
1032¼jkLrk½
00
00
90
1025
00
17
56
1024
00
13
12
1020
00
01
91
1005¼jkLrk½
00
02
83
159
00
00
36
160
00
02
25
161
00
09
03
162
00
04
13
163
00
00
36
164
00
13
86
165
00
00
36
199¼pd ekxZ½
00
01
73
203
00
02
32
201
00
00
77
184
00
01
67
186
00
02
20
185
00
00
37
200
00
00
36
187
00
09
86
198
00
00
58
194¼pd ekxZ½
00
00
72
197
00
21
06
196
00
00
54
195
00
04
72
214
00
03
51
62
00
05
31
xt rMok
681¼unh½
00
12
89
rIik % xskrek
700
00
00
36
699
00
05
69
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4264
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
698
00
00
36
697
00
00
36
701
00
09
42
696
00
12
70
695
00
00
99
693
00
00
36
692
00
07
94
691
00
03
79
690
00
00
44
689
00
04
57
688
00
01
19
687
00
10
41
685
00
01
34
684
00
00
36
665¼pd ekxZ½
00
00
67
646
00
01
56
645
00
04
03
634
00
00
94
633
00
05
10
631
00
05
37
630¼pd ekxZ½
00
01
11
629
00
07
07
601¼pd ekxZ½
00
00
81
581
00
04
02
580
00
00
52
582
00
11
38
584
00
07
90
585¼pd ekxZ½
00
01
13
586
00
12
76
589
00
00
36
579¼jkLrk½
00
02
58
573
00
00
36
574
00
11
56
575
00
03
92
576
00
00
36
572
00
03
43
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4265
571
00
01
94
577
00
00
36
565
00
04
11
564
00
04
03
563
00
03
54
562
00
02
56
559
00
01
93
558
00
05
97
556
00
12
33
551
00
00
36
550
00
04
68
548
00
05
15
549¼jkLrk½
00
00
36
578
00
00
48
vkyhvk pd
95
00
04
18
rIik % xskrek
92
00
01
64
91
00
00
36
1¼jkLrk½
00
05
90
c=kSyh
375¼jkLrk½
00
01
71
rIik % xskrek
393
00
08
07
392¼pd ekxZ½
00
00
67
391
00
09
43
388
00
08
78
387
00
07
75
386
00
06
72
385
00
07
80
383¼pd ekxZ½
00
00
54
377
00
10
86
378
00
04
04
379
00
05
00
380
00
01
27
374¼pd ekxZ½
00
00
82
373
00
04
72
372
00
07
80
369
00
07
02
368
00
00
36
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4266
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
340¼Msªbu½
00
02
16
444
00
00
36
445
00
07
32
446
00
12
26
449¼pd ekxZ½
00
00
65
339
00
17
69
338
00
00
36
336
00
22
71
327
00
00
36
334
00
05
79
328
00
00
42
333
00
03
53
332
00
05
88
306
00
03
17
304
00
11
74
236¼jkLrk½
00
01
08
235
00
01
16
ikaMsiqj
17
00
15
23
rIik % xskrek
16¼pd ekxZ½
00
01
70
15
00
01
67
12
00
04
92
11
00
04
11
10
00
17
73
rkaMok
479¼jkLrk½
00
00
92
rIik % xskrek
477
00
01
04
476
00
12
24
468¼pd ekxZ½
00
00
81
377
00
11
70
375
00
11
52
374
00
02
46
373
00
05
33
372
00
00
36
371¼pd ekxZ½
00
00
90
370
00
12
60
365
00
05
69
364
00
08
21
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4267
363¼pd ekxZ½
00
00
72
356
00
01
44
355
00
09
70
357
00
03
20
358
00
03
52
353
00
08
96
352
00
02
70
351
00
05
26
345
00
02
72
344
00
01
89
fNrkSuh
574¼jkLrk½
00
04
86
rIik % xskrek
576
00
01
41
572
00
08
25
573
00
00
27
554¼pd ekxZ½
00
00
54
539
00
07
18
538
00
16
81
526
00
14
00
525¼pd ekxZ½
00
00
54
523
00
06
05
524
00
04
50
521
00
00
68
520
00
07
92
469¼jkLrk½
00
02
32
ckyHknª pd
160¼jkLrk½
00
00
81
rIik % xskrek
103
00
00
45
104
00
05
70
102
00
00
65
101
00
00
69
100
00
00
69
99
00
00
31
98
00
04
22
97
00
03
97
96
00
03
33
94¼pd ekxZ½
00
00
54
92
00
18
34
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4268
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
91
00
05
25
90
00
04
53
89
00
04
37
86
00
10
29
78¼pd ekxZ½
00
00
59
87
00
00
36
75
00
19
85
76¼pd ekxZ½
00
00
56
70
00
07
15
71
00
00
79
68
00
07
93
62
00
03
72
63¼pd ekxZ½
00
00
63
58
00
03
14
59
00
00
36
57
00
03
18
56
00
03
34
55
00
03
42
54
00
08
53
53¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
00
81
74¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
01
06
cynhgk
35¼jkLrk½
00
01
84
rIik % xskrek
32
00
34
17
33
00
01
45
31
00
03
77
30
00
01
09
29¼pd ekxZ½
00
00
65
25
00
16
10
cjk;ij ikaMs
911¼jkLrk½
00
00
84
rIik % xskrek
910
00
01
80
909
00
09
31
907
00
08
96
900
00
07
61
901
00
08
86
899
00
04
23
896
00
00
64
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4269
890
00
05
76
891
00
09
87
893¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
00
72
463
00
05
23
465
00
15
05
464
00
00
36
466
00
10
18
453¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
00
69
442
00
06
04
441
00
03
52
443
00
04
17
444
00
04
72
446
00
05
46
436¼jkLrk½
00
00
55
431
00
03
29
430
00
08
52
429
00
08
68
427
00
00
84
418
00
02
59
425
00
08
80
419
00
01
75
424
00
03
88
423
00
02
53
421¼ukyk½
00
02
65
420 ¼ukyk½
00
00
35
iqjSuk
114
00
13
00
rIik % xskrek
113
00
03
47
116 ¼ukyk½
00
00
36
117
00
00
36
110
00
09
79
115 ¼pd ekxZ½
00
00
36
119
00
00
36
109
00
10
24
75 ¼jkLrk½
00
01
16
33
00
18
60
35
00
00
18
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4270
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
34
00
00
18
320 ¼pd ekxZ½
00
07
75
319
00
00
36
321
00
00
36
32
00
04
92
29
00
08
06
28
00
00
59
322
00
00
54
324
00
00
36
328
00
00
36
329
00
00
36
330
00
00
36
334
00
00
36
27
00
07
24
25
00
09
93
24
00
10
51
23
00
03
00
22
00
07
45
324 ¼pd ekxZ½
00
04
78
335
00
00
58
ckgyksok
244¼ukyk½
00
00
85
rIik % gosyh
220
00
37
01
221
00
00
36
200¼jkLrk½
00
01
83
164
00
20
51
172
00
00
36
171
00
00
36
165¼pd ekxZ½
00
04
70
170
00
00
23
169
00
00
18
168
00
00
84
155
00
07
36
154
00
03
69
153
00
10
46
166
00
01
19
92¼pd ekxZ½
00
00
59
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4271
26
00
17
22
25
00
00
36
27
00
27
46
33
00
02
64
32
00
12
63
Hkkyh Nkijk
519
00
00
38
rIik % gosyh
525
00
00
36
511
00
05
85
512
00
06
21
513
00
05
31
514
00
05
58
515
00
11
16
516
00
09
45
517
00
02
48
518
00
00
36
509
00
12
21
508
00
23
76
490 ¼pd ekxZ½
00
00
63
468
00
07
02
469
00
15
12
462
00
07
92
460
00
00
63
470 ¼jkLrk½
00
01
26
458
00
03
56
457
00
00
72
486
00
00
49
471
00
15
30
473 ¼pd ekxZ½
00
00
63
302
00
09
36
304
00
11
16
305
00
07
47
353
00
11
62
354
00
03
74
358 ¼pd ekxZ½
00
00
72
399 ¼pd ekxZ½
00
00
36
457
00
00
36
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4272
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
359
00
04
96
361
00
27
36
409 ¼pd ekxZ½
00
00
63
398
00
00
36
397 ¼pd ekxZ½
00
00
81
394
00
04
05
395
00
08
46
396
00
08
46
tksxkSj
116 ¼jkLrk½
00
00
72
rIik % gosyh
113
00
10
53
112
00
09
45
119 ¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
00
63
109
00
11
16
126 ¼pd ekxZ½
00
00
63
82
00
21
69
76 ¼pd ekxZ½
00
00
63
75
00
03
33
74
00
10
53
73
00
05
13
72
00
11
05
60
00
00
36
69 ¼pd ekxZ½
00
00
36
54
00
00
36
53
00
00
36
62
00
00
36
71
00
16
69
70
00
05
67
50 ¼pd ekxZ½
00
01
22
52
00
00
15
51
00
00
17
43
00
00
04
49
00
00
30
ek/kksiqj ¼e/kkSj½
350
00
07
01
rIik % gosyh
349
00
06
21
348
00
12
33
347
00
06
03
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4273
346
00
00
63
298 ¼jkLrk½
00
01
55
344
00
03
69
341
00
07
45
340
00
06
30
328
00
06
30
326
00
01
84
325
00
03
17
324
00
08
06
323
00
07
81
308 ¼pd ekxZ½
00
00
59
312
00
08
53
313
00
00
36
311
00
18
50
92 ¼pd ekxZ½
00
00
59
87
00
08
59
86
00
07
04
85 ¼pd ekxZ½
00
00
59
81
00
12
19
82
00
07
76
80
00
08
09
78
00
00
36
79
00
03
69
99 ¼pd ekxZ½
00
02
44
97
00
00
28
98
00
01
71
96
00
00
36
100
00
03
11
70 ¼pd ekxZ½
00
00
61
35
00
18
18
39
00
00
36
38
00
14
04
37 ¼pd ekxZ½
00
00
68
tlqb
285
00
15
21
rIik % gosyh
286 ¼pd ekxZ½
00
00
59
339
00
00
36
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4274
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
338
00
00
36
287
00
07
02
289
00
13
86
290 ¼pd ekxZ½
00
00
54
291
00
04
28
296
00
36
22
300
00
06
80
297
00
00
36
298
00
05
76
299
00
00
70
161 ¼jkLrk½
00
03
69
120
00
00
36
117
00
00
36
110
00
01
43
111
00
06
00
112
00
01
43
108
00
23
58
107
00
10
20
106 ¼pd ekxZ½
00
01
82
96
00
04
41
37 ¼jkLrk½
00
01
44
36
00
15
08
35
00
02
48
fc'kquiqjk
341
00
05
76
rIik % gosyh
340
00
06
48
339
00
03
76
202 ¼jkLrk½
00
00
53
104
00
00
27
103
00
00
36
Vsaxjh
215
00
00
61
rIik % gosyh
214
00
08
30
213
00
02
16
212
00
02
83
211
00
03
45
210
00
03
78
207
00
08
64
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4275
206
00
07
13
205
00
04
09
204
00
03
96
203 ¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
00
21
201
00
00
10
145 ¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
00
54
139
00
00
72
138
00
04
95
137 ¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
01
15
136
00
00
66
140
00
00
76
121
00
06
19
120
00
09
09
122
00
05
55
119
00
03
30
118
00
02
25
123
00
00
54
129@216 ¼pd ekxZ½
00
00
36
107
00
00
36
105
00
00
36
106
00
00
36
117
00
05
94
116
00
01
89
115
00
01
58
114
00
01
62
113
00
01
53
112
00
03
19
108
00
04
68
109
00
00
36
97 ¼pd ekxZ½
00
00
54
96
00
04
68
95
00
05
20
94
00
02
43
93
00
02
70
89
00
03
97
90
00
17
03
88
00
00
36
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4276
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
cjdk xkao
555¼pd ekxZ½
00
00
59
rIik % gosyh
556
00
09
68
557
00
11
07
558
00
03
80
560
00
14
51
562
00
02
30
561
00
19
64
569
00
23
52
570¼pd ekxZ½
00
03
36
581
00
03
13
582
00
05
96
568
00
01
35
594¼jkLrk½
00
00
63
623
00
13
86
622
00
00
36
624
00
11
76
621
00
00
36
620
00
02
88
625
00
05
22
619
00
03
41
618
00
10
88
627
00
00
66
628
00
00
36
629¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
01
17
637
00
07
38
638
00
08
28
636
00
00
36
639
00
04
90
640
00
04
18
641
00
06
57
642
00
04
14
643
00
13
77
56¼pd ekxZ½
00
00
63
669
00
15
12
670
00
00
36
668
00
02
36
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4277
674
00
07
88
673
00
00
56
672¼jkLrk½
00
02
25
691
00
00
36
682
00
13
45
683
00
00
36
692
00
03
29
681¼pd ekxZ½
00
01
50
680
00
03
86
712
00
07
92
711¼pd ekxZ½
00
00
63
710
00
09
72
709
00
00
36
727
00
05
58
728
00
01
83
729
00
01
33
706
00
12
89
705
00
00
36
755
00
15
16
756
00
04
32
757
00
05
18
758
00
04
81
759
00
01
09
871
00
00
36
873¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
07
74
936
00
00
93
938
00
05
55
941
00
00
50
942
00
00
36
939
00
00
63
940
00
04
01
944
00
04
64
945
00
04
16
947
00
02
81
950
00
04
03
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4278
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
955¼pd ekxZ½
00
00
60
954
00
01
08
949
00
00
72
951
00
04
98
962
00
02
56
fiijk fcBy
914
00
01
43
rIik % ?kkVh
913
00
00
36
912
00
00
36
911
00
00
36
yky pd
334
00
08
46
rIik % ?kkVh
333
00
01
47
332
00
00
36
329
00
09
59
328
00
06
48
326
00
03
72
327
00
13
05
322
00
00
36
324
00
03
44
323
00
04
11
280
00
13
23
308
00
08
00
307
00
00
36
294
00
02
76
303
00
02
88
304
00
00
36
302
00
03
82
301
00
03
78
149&339¼pdjksM½
00
00
67
147
00
00
36
149
00
16
56
152
00
16
20
154¼pdjksM½
00
01
04
159
00
00
26
160
00
04
07
161
00
01
13
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4279
153¼pdjksM½
00
00
90
110
00
07
74
106¼pdjksM½
00
00
63
105
00
13
73
104¼pdjksM½
00
00
63
68
00
00
36
94
00
06
48
93&337
00
00
56
69¼pdjksM½
00
01
23
93
00
00
67
50
00
02
02
49
00
06
90
45
00
03
96
44
00
04
18
43
00
05
35
38
00
11
02
¹iQk- la- vkj-&25011@23@2013&vksvkj&Iº
iou oqQekj] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 5th August, 2013
S.O. 1623.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that a
pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited in Tehsil Bhatpar Rani, District Deoria in the State of Uttar
Pradesh for 'Siwan to Baitalpur Pipeline' for the transportation of Petroleum Product;
And, whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary
to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which is described in the
Schedule annexed to this notification;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals
Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention
to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty-one days from the date on
which the copies of the notification issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of
India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the
pipeline under the land, to Shri Umakant Tripathi Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited. (Pipelines Division)
Subedargunj, P.O. Pipalgaon, District : Allahabad, Pin-211012, State Uttar Pradesh.
SCHEDULE
Tehsil : Bhatpar Rani
District : Deoria
State : Uttar Pradesh
Mouja / Village
Survey/BlockNo.
Sub-Div-No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
Bankata Tirsen
43
00
04
14
(Bankata Chitrasen)
42
00
00
36
Tappa : Balivan
41
00
00
36
44
00
01
44
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4280
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
52 (Cart track)
00
00
90
36
00
10
26
35
00
00
36
37
00
05
58
38
00
12
60
39
00
06
30
BANKATA JAGDISH
395
00
01
31
Tappa : Balivan
391
00
10
44
392
00
00
36
390(CHAK ROAD)
00
01
08
389
00
09
72
387
00
00
36
386
00
00
57
327(ROAD)
00
04
14
308
00
00
36
309
00
01
80
310
00
07
56
311
00
04
32
313
00
04
14
312(CHAK ROAD)
00
01
08
297
00
15
66
296
00
12
96
279
00
03
24
280
00
14
04
281
00
05
76
282
00
00
36
283
00
00
36
215(CHAK ROAD)
00
01
08
240
00
11
34
237(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
20
236
00
07
02
235
00
05
04
233
00
02
52
231
00
02
34
230
00
03
78
229(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
72
227
00
00
66
228
00
06
12
225
00
05
58
224
00
00
36
223(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
72
220
00
08
82
218
00
00
36
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4281
219
00
08
46
121(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
54
120(ROAD)
00
00
72
24
00
05
22
23
00
00
36
25
00
00
70
26
00
00
36
27
00
00
36
22
00
05
40
19
00
05
04
17
00
05
22
18
00
05
58
115
00
00
36
39
00
00
36
29(NALA)
00
02
34
16
00
00
36
15
00
00
36
37
00
00
69
36
00
01
80
35
00
04
68
34
00
06
48
33
00
06
30
32
00
04
14
30
00
04
50
10
00
05
94
11(ROAD)
00
01
98
BHATHAHI SEVAK CHAK
415(ROAD)
00
01
58
399
00
04
16
Tappa : Balivan
398
00
08
60
396
00
01
70
397
00
18
18
386
00
08
95
387
00
00
81
385
00
10
85
383(ROAD)
00
02
83
277
00
02
20
276
00
07
31
275
00
10
84
274
00
02
20
272
00
06
16
273
00
01
19
271
00
02
37
278(CART TRACK)
00
01
39
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4282
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
284
00
01
19
283
00
02
39
282
00
01
19
281
00
08
77
279
00
08
73
269
00
01
19
267
00
05
08
265
00
01
19
266(CART TRACK)
00
02
21
225(CART TRACK)
00
01
19
30
00
13
16
24(CART TRACK)
00
01
55
22
00
04
32
29
00
01
19
21
00
00
81
20
00
10
93
19
00
06
39
18
00
08
42
17
00
10
85
16(CART TRACK)
00
04
37
BHATHRHI JAMIN
43
00
00
36
Tappa : Balivan
42
00
00
36
38
00
04
40
37
00
08
59
34
00
00
36
36
00
01
01
35
00
03
20
33
00
00
36
14
00
08
28
12
00
14
35
11
00
00
36
9
00
01
40
INDARWA
47(CART TRACK)
00
03
28
Tappa : Balivan
45
00
16
02
46
00
04
05
KISHORI CHHAPAR
328
00
13
13
Tappa : Balivan
325
00
03
15
320
00
01
22
321(CHAK ROAD)
00
03
20
324
00
02
70
322
00
08
34
319
00
05
13
318(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
65
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4283
313
00
00
36
314
00
17
54
315
00
01
20
308(CHAK ROAD)
00
01
01
303
00
22
34
302
00
10
47
301
00
01
17
300
00
03
14
299
00
06
98
RATSIYA
942
00
00
36
Tappa : Balivan
941
00
02
77
940
00
04
32
939
00
00
36
936(CART TRACK)
00
01
98
935
00
08
82
934
00
10
48
932(CHAK ROAD)
00
01
08
916
00
24
14
915
00
01
82
914
00
00
55
910
00
01
26
879(NALA)
00
02
47
911
00
01
36
856
00
00
36
857
00
03
51
871
00
01
26
867(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
61
863
00
05
28
864
00
05
83
865
00
07
04
866
00
00
68
862(CHAK ROAD)
00
01
12
861
00
17
51
860
00
00
63
821(ROAD)
00
03
06
820
00
20
59
809
00
00
36
814(CHAK ROAD)
00
02
34
713
00
11
47
726(CHAK ROAD)
00
01
08
727
00
04
43
728
00
05
40
729
00
10
53
730
00
06
66
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4284
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
731
00
04
88
732
00
05
83
733
00
05
85
735
00
07
54
736
00
03
33
753(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
90
754(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
90
777
00
00
36
776
00
00
56
775
00
06
32
773
00
04
97
772(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
63
771
00
10
98
770
00
04
21
769
00
05
26
768(CHAK ROAD)
00
01
19
767
00
05
76
764
00
04
82
763
00
02
76
PAKADIA KUND
243
00
06
59
Tappa : Balivan
220
00
02
16
151
00
00
14
150
00
00
36
152
00
01
66
153
00
03
31
154
00
02
74
168(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
90
169
00
04
55
170
00
03
24
171
00
03
38
172
00
03
53
173
00
03
46
176(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
90
177
00
02
81
178
00
04
05
186
00
12
64
188
00
04
81
189
00
06
05
194
00
00
36
195
00
02
15
196
00
04
97
197
00
02
60
199
00
00
36
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4285
204(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
44
201
00
02
35
206
00
00
36
200
00
23
62
100(BRICK ROAD)
00
00
90
25
00
05
63
22
00
04
59
21
00
06
80
20
00
03
08
18
00
03
49
17
00
02
16
16
00
01
50
15
00
00
36
SIKTIA NAYAK
1029(ROAD)
00
02
79
Tappa : Balivan
1088
00
03
87
1087
00
06
03
1086
00
07
33
1084
00
06
52
1083
00
06
62
1082
00
00
36
1081
00
00
36
1032(ROAD)
00
00
90
1025
00
17
56
1024
00
13
12
1020
00
01
91
1005(ROAD)
00
02
83
159
00
00
36
160
00
02
25
161
00
09
03
162
00
04
13
163
00
00
36
164
00
13
86
165
00
00
36
199(CHAK ROAD)
00
01
73
203
00
02
32
201
00
00
77
184
00
01
67
186
00
02
20
185
00
00
37
200
00
00
36
187
00
09
86
198
00
00
58
194(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
72
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4286
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
197
00
21
06
196
00
00
54
195
00
04
72
214
00
03
51
62
00
05
31
GAJ TADWA
681(RIVER)
00
12
89
Tappa : Gotma
700
00
00
36
699
00
05
69
698
00
00
36
697
00
00
36
701
00
09
42
696
00
12
70
695
00
00
99
693
00
00
36
692
00
07
94
691
00
03
79
690
00
00
44
689
00
04
57
688
00
01
19
687
00
10
41
685
00
01
34
684
00
00
36
665(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
67
646
00
01
56
645
00
04
03
634
00
00
94
633
00
05
10
631
00
05
37
630(CHAK ROAD)
00
01
11
629
00
07
07
601(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
81
581
00
04
02
580
00
00
52
582
00
11
38
584
00
07
90
585(CHAK ROAD)
00
01
13
586
00
12
76
589
00
00
36
579(ROAD)
00
02
58
573
00
00
36
574
00
11
56
575
00
03
92
576
00
00
36
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4287
572
00
03
43
571
00
01
94
577
00
00
36
565
00
04
11
564
00
04
03
563
00
03
54
562
00
02
56
559
00
01
93
558
00
05
97
556
00
12
33
551
00
00
36
550
00
04
68
548
00
05
15
549(ROAD)
00
00
36
578
00
00
48
ALIA CHAK
95
00
04
18
Tappa : Gotma
92
00
01
64
91
00
00
36
1(ROAD)
00
05
90
BATROULI
375(ROAD)
00
01
71
Tappa : Gotma
393
00
08
07
392(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
67
391
00
09
43
388
00
08
78
387
00
07
75
386
00
06
72
385
00
07
80
383(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
54
377
00
10
86
378
00
04
04
379
00
05
00
380
00
01
27
374(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
82
373
00
04
72
372
00
07
80
369
00
07
02
368
00
00
36
340(DRAIN)
00
02
16
444
00
00
36
445
00
07
32
446
00
12
26
449(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
65
339
00
17
69
338
00
00
36
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4288
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
336
00
22
71
327
00
00
36
334
00
05
79
328
00
00
42
333
00
03
53
332
00
05
88
306
00
03
17
304
00
11
74
236(ROAD)
00
01
08
235
00
01
16
PANDEPUR
17
00
15
23
Tappa : Gotma
16(CHAK ROAD)
00
01
70
15
00
01
67
12
00
04
92
11
00
04
11
10
00
17
73
TANDWA
479(ROAD)
00
00
92
Tappa : Gotma
477
00
01
04
476
00
12
24
468(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
81
377
00
11
70
375
00
11
52
374
00
02
46
373
00
05
33
372
00
00
36
371(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
90
370
00
12
60
365
00
05
69
364
00
08
21
363(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
72
356
00
01
44
355
00
09
70
357
00
03
20
358
00
03
52
353
00
08
96
352
00
02
70
351
00
05
26
345
00
02
72
344
00
01
89
CHHITOUNI
574(ROAD)
00
04
86
Tappa : Gotma
576
00
01
41
572
00
08
25
573
00
00
27
554(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
54
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4289
539
00
07
18
538
00
16
81
526
00
14
00
525(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
54
523
00
06
05
524
00
04
50
521
00
00
68
520
00
07
92
469(ROAD)
00
02
32
BALBHADRA CHAK
160(road)
00
00
81
Tappa : Gotma
103
00
00
45
104
00
05
70
102
00
00
65
101
00
00
69
100
00
00
69
99
00
00
31
98
00
04
22
97
00
03
97
96
00
03
33
94(chak road)
00
00
54
92
00
18
34
91
00
05
25
90
00
04
53
89
00
04
37
86
00
10
29
78(chak road)
00
00
59
87
00
00
36
75
00
19
85
76(chak road)
00
00
56
70
00
07
15
71
00
00
79
68
00
07
93
62
00
03
72
63(chak road)
00
00
63
58
00
03
14
59
00
00
36
57
00
03
18
56
00
03
34
55
00
03
42
54
00
08
53
53(cart track)
00
00
81
74(cart track)
00
01
06
BELDIHA
35(road)
00
01
84
Tappa : Gotma
32
00
34
17
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4290
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
33
00
01
45
31
00
03
77
30
00
01
09
29(chak road)
00
00
65
25
00
16
10
BARAIPAR PANDEY
911(road)
00
00
84
Tappa : Gotma
910
00
01
80
909
00
09
31
907
00
08
96
900
00
07
61
901
00
08
86
899
00
04
23
896
00
00
64
890
00
05
76
891
00
09
87
893(cart track)
00
00
72
463
00
05
23
465
00
15
05
464
00
00
36
466
00
10
18
453(cart track)
00
00
69
442
00
06
04
441
00
03
52
443
00
04
17
444
00
04
72
446
00
05
46
436(road)
00
00
55
431
00
03
29
430
00
08
52
429
00
08
68
427
00
00
84
418
00
02
59
425
00
08
80
419
00
01
75
424
00
03
88
423
00
02
53
421(nala)
00
02
65
420 (Nala)
00
00
35
PURAINA
114
00
13
00
Tappa : Gotma
113
00
03
47
116 (Nala)
00
00
36
117
00
00
36
110
00
09
79
115 (Chak Road)
00
00
36
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4291
119
00
00
36
109
00
10
24
75 (Road)
00
01
16
33
00
18
60
35
00
00
18
34
00
00
18
320 (Chak Road)
00
07
75
319
00
00
36
321
00
00
36
32
00
04
92
29
00
08
06
28
00
00
59
322
00
00
54
324
00
00
36
328
00
00
36
329
00
00
36
330
00
00
36
334
00
00
36
27
00
07
24
25
00
09
93
24
00
10
51
23
00
03
00
22
00
07
45
324 (Chak Road)
00
04
78
335
00
00
58
BAHLOLWA
244(NALA)
00
00
85
Tappa : Haweli
220
00
37
01
221
00
00
36
200(ROAD)
00
01
83
164
00
20
51
172
00
00
36
171
00
00
36
165(CHAK ROAD)
00
04
70
170
00
00
23
169
00
00
18
168
00
00
84
155
00
07
36
154
00
03
69
153
00
10
46
166
00
01
19
92(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
59
26
00
17
22
25
00
00
36
27
00
27
46
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4292
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
33
00
02
64
32
00
12
63
BHALI CHHAPARA
519
00
00
38
Tappa : Haweli
525
00
00
36
511
00
05
85
512
00
06
21
513
00
05
31
514
00
05
58
515
00
11
16
516
00
09
45
517
00
02
48
518
00
00
36
509
00
12
21
508
00
23
76
490(Chak Road)
00
00
63
468
00
07
02
469
00
15
12
462
00
07
92
460
00
00
63
470 (ROAD)
00
01
26
458
00
03
56
457
00
00
72
486
00
00
49
471
00
15
30
473 (CHAK ROAD)
00
00
63
302
00
09
36
304
00
11
16
305
00
07
47
353
00
11
62
354
00
03
74
358 (CHAK ROAD)
00
00
72
399(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
36
457
00
00
36
359
00
04
96
361
00
27
36
409(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
63
398
00
00
36
397(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
81
394
00
04
05
395
00
08
46
396
00
08
46
JOGAUR
116 (ROAD)
00
00
72
Tappa : Haweli
113
00
10
53
112
00
09
45
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4293
119 (CART TRACK)
00
00
63
109
00
11
16
126(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
63
82
00
21
69
76 (CHAK ROAD)
00
00
63
75
00
03
33
74
00
10
53
73
00
05
13
72
00
11
05
60
00
00
36
69 (CHAK ROAD)
00
00
36
54
00
00
36
53
00
00
36
62
00
00
36
71
00
16
69
70
00
05
67
50 (CHAK ROAD)
00
01
22
52
00
00
15
51
00
00
17
43
00
00
04
49
00
00
30
MADHOPUR(MADHOUR)
350
00
07
01
Tappa : Haweli
349
00
06
21
348
00
12
33
347
00
06
03
346
00
00
63
298 (Road)
00
01
55
344
00
03
69
341
00
07
45
340
00
06
30
328
00
06
30
326
00
01
84
325
00
03
17
324
00
08
06
323
00
07
81
308 (Chak Road)
00
00
59
312
00
08
53
313
00
00
36
311
00
18
50
92 (Chak Road)
00
00
59
87
00
08
59
86
00
07
04
85 (Chak Road)
00
00
59
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4294
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
81
00
12
19
82
00
07
76
80
00
08
09
78
00
00
36
79
00
03
69
99 (Chak Road)
00
02
44
97
00
00
28
98
00
01
71
96
00
00
36
100
00
03
11
70 (Chak Road)
00
00
61
35
00
18
18
39
00
00
36
38
00
14
04
37 (Chak Road)
00
00
68
JASUI
285
00
15
21
Tappa : Haweli
286 (Chak Road)
00
00
59
339
00
00
36
338
00
00
36
287
00
07
02
289
00
13
86
290 (Chak Road)
00
00
54
291
00
04
28
296
00
36
22
300
00
06
80
297
00
00
36
298
00
05
76
299
00
00
70
161 (Road)
00
03
69
120
00
00
36
117
00
00
36
110
00
01
43
111
00
06
00
112
00
01
43
108
00
23
58
107
00
10
20
106 (Chak Road)
00
01
82
96
00
04
41
37 (Road)
00
01
44
36
00
15
08
35
00
02
48
BISHUNPURA
341
00
05
76
Tappa : Haweli
340
00
06
48
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4295
339
00
03
76
202 (Road)
00
00
53
104
00
00
27
103
00
00
36
TENGRI
215
00
00
61
Tappa : Haweli
214
00
08
30
213
00
02
16
212
00
02
83
211
00
03
45
210
00
03
78
207
00
08
64
206
00
07
13
205
00
04
09
204
00
03
96
203 (Cart Track)
00
00
21
201
00
00
10
145 (Cart Track)
00
00
54
139
00
00
72
138
00
04
95
137 (Cart Track)
00
01
15
136
00
00
66
140
00
00
76
121
00
06
19
120
00
09
09
122
00
05
55
119
00
03
30
118
00
02
25
123
00
00
54
129/216 (Chak Road)
00
00
36
107
00
00
36
105
00
00
36
106
00
00
36
117
00
05
94
116
00
01
89
115
00
01
58
114
00
01
62
113
00
01
53
112
00
03
19
108
00
04
68
109
00
00
36
97 (Chak Road)
00
00
54
96
00
04
68
95
00
05
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4296
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
94
00
02
43
93
00
02
70
89
00
03
97
90
00
17
03
88
00
00
36
BARKA GAON
555 (CHAK ROAD)
00
00
59
Tappa : Haweli
556
00
09
68
557
00
11
07
558
00
03
80
560
00
14
51
562
00
02
30
561
00
19
64
569
00
23
52
570 (CHAK ROAD)
00
03
36
581
00
03
13
582
00
05
96
568
00
01
35
594 (ROAD)
00
00
63
623
00
13
86
622
00
00
36
624
00
11
76
621
00
00
36
620
00
02
88
625
00
05
22
619
00
03
41
618
00
10
88
627
00
00
66
628
00
00
36
629 (CART TRACK)
00
01
17
637
00
07
38
638
00
08
28
636
00
00
36
639
00
04
90
640
00
04
18
641
00
06
57
642
00
04
14
643
00
13
77
56 (CHAK ROAD)
00
00
63
669
00
15
12
670
00
00
36
668
00
02
36
674
00
07
88
673
00
00
56
672 (ROAD)
00
02
25
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4297
691
00
00
36
682
00
13
45
683
00
00
36
692
00
03
29
681 (CHAK ROAD)
00
01
50
680
00
03
86
712
00
07
92
711 (CHAK ROAD)
00
00
63
710
00
09
72
709
00
00
36
727
00
05
58
728
00
01
83
729
00
01
33
706
00
12
89
705
00
00
36
755
00
15
16
756
00
04
32
757
00
05
18
758
00
04
81
759
00
01
09
871
00
00
36
873 (CART TRACK)
00
07
74
936
00
00
93
938
00
05
55
941
00
00
50
942
00
00
36
939
00
00
63
940
00
04
01
944
00
04
64
945
00
04
16
947
00
02
81
950
00
04
03
955 (CHAK ROAD)
00
00
60
954
00
01
08
949
00
00
72
951
00
04
98
962
00
02
56
PIPRA BITHAL
914
00
01
43
Tappa : Ghati
913
00
00
36
912
00
00
36
911
00
00
36
LAL CHAK
334
00
08
46
Tappa : Ghati
333
00
01
47
332
00
00
36
329
00
09
59
328
00
06
48
326
00
03
72
327
00
13
05
322
00
00
36
324
00
03
44
323
00
04
11
280
00
13
23
308
00
08
00
307
00
00
36
294
00
02
76
303
00
02
88
304
00
00
36
302
00
03
82
301
00
03
78
149-339 (CHAK ROAD)
00
00
67
147
00
00
36
149
00
16
56
152
00
16
20
154 (CHAK ROAD)
00
01
04
159
00
00
26
160
00
04
07
161
00
01
13
153 (CHAK ROAD)
00
00
90
110
00
07
74
106 (CHAK ROAD)
00
00
63
105
00
13
73
104 (CHAK ROAD)
00
00
63
68
00
00
36
94
00
06
48
93/337
00
00
56
69 (CHAK ROAD)
00
01
23
93
00
00
67
50
00
02
02
49
00
06
90
45
00
03
96
44
00
04
18
43
00
05
35
38
00
11
02
[F. No. R-25011/23/2013-OR-I]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
4298
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
ubZ fnYyh] 5 vxLr] 2013
dk-vk-
1624-—dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slk izrhr gksrk gS fd yksd fgr esa ;g vko';d gS fd floku ls cSsrkyiqj rd isVªksfy;e
inkFkks± ds ifjogu gsrq rglhy % lkyseiqj] ftyk % nsofj;k] jkT; mÙkj izns'k esa bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbiykbu fcNkbZ
tkuh pkfg,_
vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slh ikbiykbu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, vko';d izrhr gksrk gS fd ml Hkwfe esa ftlds Hkhrj mDr
ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkus dk izLrko gS vkSj tks bl vf/lwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa o£.kr gS] mi;ksx dk vtZu fd;k tk, A
vr% vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbUl (Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/dkj dk vtZu) vf/fu;e] 1962 (1962
dk 50) dh /kjk 3 dh mi&/kjk (1) }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] mDr Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/dkj dk vtZu djus ds vius
vk'k; dh ?kks"k.kk djrh gS_
dksbZ O;fDr] tks mDr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa fgrc¼ gS] ml rkjh[k ls ftldks] Hkkjr ds jkti=k esa ;Fkk izdkf'kr bl
vfèklwpuk dh izfr;ka lk/kj.k turk dks miyC/ djk nh tkrh gSa] bDdhl fnu ds vUnj] Hkwfe ds Hkhrj ikbiykbu fcNk, tkus gsrq mi;ksx
ds vf/dkj ds vtZu ds fy,] Jh mekdkar f=kikBh] l{ke izkf/dkjh] bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM] (ikbiykbu fMohtu)] lqcsnkjxat]
iks-vks- % ihiyxk¡o] ftyk % bykgkckn] fiu&211012] jkT; % mÙkj izns'k dks fyf[kr :i eas vk{ksi Hkst ldsxkA
vuqlwph
rglhy % lkyseiqj
ftyk nsofj;k
jkT; % mÙkj izns'k
ekStk@xzke
losZ@Cykd@la- (IykWV la-)
lc&Mho&la-
{ks=kiQy
gsDVs;j
vkjs
oxZ ehVj
1
2
3
4
5
6
nkukSj
1066
00
16
56
rIik % HkkVuh
1065
00
00
54
1067
00
04
23
1076
00
00
36
1075
00
04
23
1074
00
00
36
1073
00
00
36
1084
00
00
36
1080
00
00
36
1087
00
00
36
1078
00
16
74
1079
00
08
37
964
00
07
38
1077
00
00
36
965
00
13
31
963
00
00
69
962
00
06
66
961
00
02
66
960
00
00
36
966
00
00
36
885 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
76
878
00
00
74
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4299
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4300
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
876
00
06
48
875
00
05
76
874
00
18
54
870¼pdjksM½
00
00
77
864¼pdjksM½
00
00
36
861
00
00
36
866
00
09
27
865
00
11
70
855
00
03
28
854
00
04
52
852
00
06
25
851
00
00
36
848¼pdjksM½
00
00
63
846
00
06
57
845
00
07
18
844
00
13
32
843
00
05
02
842
00
04
68
835
00
08
46
836
00
07
20
834
00
00
36
833¼pdjksM½
00
00
63
832
00
14
58
829
00
00
37
828
00
00
36
lojsth
1245
00
00
36
rIik % HkkVuh
1242
00
00
38
1241
00
03
71
1238
00
18
03
1237¼pdjksM½
00
00
68
1234
00
09
25
1232
00
00
36
1226
00
01
54
1225
00
00
59
1224
00
04
95
1227
00
00
52
1223
00
02
02
1221
00
03
36
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4301
1222
00
08
39
1163
00
09
41
1162
00
00
62
1161
00
17
22
1159
00
03
95
1157
00
00
87
1153
00
00
36
1158
00
02
41
1149
00
02
58
1152
00
02
95
1151
00
00
36
1150
00
06
58
1146
00
02
11
1145 ¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
00
52
1143
00
05
48
1142
00
03
27
1139
00
07
19
1140
00
02
60
1102
00
08
92
1103
00
17
04
1101
00
00
88
919 ¼jkLrk½
00
01
50
542
00
00
36
528
00
10
45
530
00
04
58
581
00
18
74
537
00
00
36
531
00
00
36
536
00
02
78
532
00
07
05
535
00
01
17
533
00
14
10
521
00
01
61
520
00
10
24
519
00
00
67
500
00
02
69
496 ¼pdjksM½
00
01
25
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4302
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
467
00
00
27
462 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
17
460
00
06
85
461
00
00
91
459
00
10
51
458
00
02
67
453
00
04
71
454
00
08
08
451
00
03
79
450
00
00
90
446
00
00
36
445 ¼jkLrk½
00
00
74
414
00
21
89
412
00
06
04
411
00
03
25
410
00
02
87
302 ¼pdjksM½
00
01
21
106
00
01
72
105
00
00
36
107
00
00
36
77
00
11
55
75
00
00
36
78@1606
00
02
71
76
00
04
92
78
00
18
72
73 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
69
78@1623
00
00
36
60
00
01
60
61
00
00
36
62
00
06
57
63
00
00
36
65
00
01
40
64
00
00
36
66
00
08
06
48
00
00
36
47
00
10
59
44 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
60
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4303
30
00
05
01
29
00
02
27
28
00
03
62
Hkjgs pkSjk
1309 ¼pdjksM½
00
01
03
rIik % ?kkVh
1305
00
00
90
1303
00
15
50
1300
00
07
39
1299
00
00
11
1301
00
02
17
1288
00
00
36
1290
00
05
89
1289
00
09
34
1285
00
00
36
1284
00
08
26
1283
00
06
68
1282 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
99
1278
00
03
15
1279 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
72
1281
00
02
67
1280
00
05
55
1274 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
68
350
00
00
28
351
00
07
24
353
00
14
07
352
00
03
97
354 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
90
359
00
02
95
355
00
11
03
356
00
03
35
345 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
75
344
00
06
11
341 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
74
340
00
06
49
333
00
05
21
316 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
53
204
00
00
36
203
00
11
74
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4304
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
202
00
00
55
pUnkSyh
87 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
59
rIik % ?kkVh
83
00
14
96
59
00
03
44
82 v
00
09
02
81
00
00
36
80
00
03
65
79
00
00
69
98 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
44
77
00
04
04
78
00
14
72
71 c
00
01
47
71 v
00
00
36
69 c
00
12
50
69 v
00
00
36
43 ¼jkLrk½
00
00
77
6
00
19
79
3
00
12
10
4
00
00
99
1 c
00
04
98
1 v
00
12
64
mldk
1021
00
01
98
rIik % ?kkVh
1020
00
10
08
1019
00
02
35
1018
00
12
60
1017
00
00
36
996 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
90
993
00
07
02
997
00
01
44
985 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
42
983
00
17
64
984
00
37
31
979 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
72
894
00
00
36
902
00
03
51
909
00
00
36
901
00
10
26
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4305
910
00
00
36
872
00
04
86
870
00
12
60
871
00
00
54
868
00
08
59
867
00
10
24
866
00
10
80
864
00
10
08
cgsjk Mkcsj
615
00
07
25
rIik % ?kkVh
613
00
10
93
610
00
01
54
609
00
00
36
611
00
08
89
607 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
72
546
00
20
34
557
00
02
31
556
00
01
93
555
00
09
77
560
00
00
64
554
00
13
18
553
00
02
68
542 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
54
521
00
02
28
522
00
00
36
520
00
06
97
519
00
00
19
518
00
01
84
517
00
02
50
515
00
10
98
516
00
03
16
514
00
06
48
512
00
13
36
508
00
13
70
507
00
00
36
rsuqvk
305
00
01
19
rIik % ?kkVh
304
00
06
96
303
00
02
95
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4306
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
302
00
07
83
301
00
03
96
300
00
02
10
284 ¼jksM½
00
00
71
283
00
00
36
282
00
06
70
281
00
04
95
280
00
09
83
279
00
02
58
267 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
58
258
00
06
21
256
00
00
36
259
00
04
10
261
00
01
20
262
00
05
64
263
00
19
80
228
00
05
72
227
00
07
08
226
00
07
02
225
00
03
50
218
00
01
30
224
00
01
74
223
00
04
88
222
00
00
41
220
00
03
29
221
00
03
24
3
00
02
88
thKk nh{khr
599 ¼jksM½
00
00
67
rIik % ?kkVh
600
00
06
15
598 ¼pdjksM½
00
01
15
597
00
19
01
596
00
18
45
595
00
02
38
568 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
67
560
00
01
15
559
00
09
04
553 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
65
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4307
551
00
07
31
550
00
04
81
548 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
63
482
00
04
59
483
00
09
99
479
00
05
49
478 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
63
476
00
00
36
475
00
15
39
472 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
63
466
00
18
95
463 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
72
462
00
11
65
455
00
19
35
454
00
04
88
453
00
00
36
339 ¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
01
55
328
00
00
36
327
00
13
82
326
00
19
35
325
00
00
36
ehJkSyh nh{khr
1055
00
13
59
rIik % ?kkVh
1058
00
08
89
1061
00
05
96
1062
00
05
54
1064
00
07
31
1065
00
02
25
1066
00
00
81
1025 ¼jksM½
00
05
76
1010&1239
00
01
16
1010&1238
00
00
99
1010&1240
00
04
65
1007 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
53
1005
00
02
85
1006
00
06
49
1004
00
03
78
985 ¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
02
70
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4308
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
903
00
07
74
904
00
00
36
908
00
06
88
909
00
00
36
913
00
07
06
910
00
03
23
912
00
06
56
918
00
00
36
919
00
04
38
911
00
03
96
595
00
03
82
920
00
00
36
420&1232 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
63
420
00
23
29
419
00
01
43
421
00
05
72
422 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
70
423
00
06
00
424
00
12
35
427 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
63
431
00
15
48
430
00
00
41
435
00
17
64
437 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
54
441
00
06
45
442
00
07
89
446
00
07
38
447 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
63
457
00
17
28
459
00
05
72
460
00
00
44
461
00
00
36
ehJkSyh cSn
67
00
01
08
rIik % ?kkVh
73
00
00
27
69
00
10
21
68
00
14
85
70
00
00
30
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4309
67 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
72
64
00
11
75
65
00
00
43
63
00
05
89
NksVh xand unh
00
02
75
chjlhaxiwj
67 ¼unh½
00
13
23
rIik % cjlhikj
68
00
04
50
87
00
02
16
91
00
01
23
90
00
02
95
89
00
05
31
88
00
01
87
85
00
00
18
83
00
00
54
92
00
00
36
82
00
31
14
80 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
36
79
00
00
36
81
00
14
09
47 ¼jksM½
00
00
67
42
00
15
93
44 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
90
24
00
13
77
27
00
14
87
28
00
05
47
14
00
22
32
11 ¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
00
63
10 ¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
00
63
5
00
22
32
3
00
04
41
2
00
22
32
ijlkSuh
96
00
00
41
rIik % cjlhikj
95
00
12
42
thjklks
395
00
01
26
rIik % cjlhikj
396
00
07
00
397
00
00
36
394
00
06
27
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4310
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
393
00
12
24
388 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
54
377
00
18
81
378 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
54
366
00
10
30
369
00
02
00
367
00
00
36
368
00
11
29
358 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
72
350
00
07
58
343 ¼pdjksM½
00
01
03
334
00
00
82
339
00
14
58
340 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
63
342
00
00
58
341
00
14
58
103 ¼jksM½
00
00
72
69
00
07
02
63
00
13
86
62
00
22
68
49
00
17
82
44
00
07
06
43
00
05
40
42
00
03
12
ihijk nsojkt
142
00
00
68
rIik % cjlhikj
141
00
06
12
136
00
07
56
135
00
08
64
134
00
07
83
133
00
07
92
132 ¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
00
54
102
00
13
59
103
00
05
76
115
00
00
36
104
00
04
80
106 ¼pdjksM½
00
01
30
105
00
00
96
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4311
107
00
09
02
108
00
00
36
pdjksM
00
00
54
94
00
16
20
91
00
00
86
90
00
19
98
pdjksM
00
00
54
pdjksM
00
00
54
69
00
05
49
68
00
02
52
67
00
00
36
62
00
09
57
63
00
05
83
60 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
82
59
00
09
00
68 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
81
clnso pd
128 ¼jksM½
00
01
13
rIik % lkFkh;ko
126
00
00
36
109
00
08
82
108
00
00
96
110
00
06
57
111
00
00
84
112
00
00
36
113
00
05
94
114
00
03
06
115
00
02
22
116
00
00
36
107 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
98
105
00
01
53
106
00
01
54
97 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
45
91
00
06
15
90
00
00
36
92
00
02
55
93
00
03
70
94
00
03
33
95
00
00
36
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4312
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
12 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
63
11 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
63
55
00
04
05
54 ¼pdjksM½
00
01
19
56
00
00
36
53
00
07
97
52
00
02
04
49
00
01
53
50
00
06
56
47
00
03
28
46
00
03
15
45
00
06
30
44 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
36
43 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
36
veok
463 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
62
rIik % lkFkh;ko
464
00
01
83
462
00
08
37
461
00
12
60
458 ¼pdjksM½
00
01
26
455
00
02
70
452
00
03
42
453
00
02
01
451
00
09
00
449
00
25
11
448
00
08
19
447
00
09
36
446 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
54
445
00
04
27
443
00
05
31
442
00
00
36
440
00
14
72
441
00
01
72
439
00
01
53
433 ¼dsuky½
00
06
48
259
00
03
87
258
00
16
02
256
00
01
45
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4313
255
00
00
36
248
00
00
36
109 ¼pdjksM½
00
01
08
510 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
36
110
00
14
58
108
00
14
18
107 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
54
87
00
05
94
89
00
02
72
90
00
00
36
88
00
04
14
92
00
00
36
86
00
11
70
85
00
01
02
84
00
00
36
83 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
54
82
00
15
03
80
00
07
92
79
00
12
24
76
00
16
20
47 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
45
75
00
00
36
39
00
00
36
25 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
54
24
00
05
04
23
00
04
50
22
00
02
70
38
00
00
36
20
00
21
96
21
00
02
16
19 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
54
2
00
00
36
1
00
14
31
ihijk lqdyk
293
00
01
11
rIik % lkFkh;ko
292 ¼pdjksM½
00
01
89
290
00
16
92
291
00
00
36
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4314
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
287
00
08
03
288
00
00
36
286
00
09
81
257 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
81
248
00
41
40
247 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
34
244
00
00
36
207 ¼jksM½
00
01
66
122 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
59
121
00
19
44
113 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
63
83
00
03
36
82
00
24
32
81
00
00
36
78
00
00
36
79 ¼pdjksM½
00
02
43
74
00
06
50
72
00
32
85
88 ¼ukyk½
00
01
98
vpkSyk
292
00
05
63
rIik % lkFkh;ko
293
00
05
02
302 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
42
303
00
03
15
291 ¼pdjksM½
00
01
10
266
00
00
36
267
00
01
24
268 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
34
273
00
13
77
271
00
04
25
272
00
05
39
270
00
05
28
276
00
09
00
250 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
72
233
00
00
36
231
00
05
55
232
00
00
36
230
00
04
68
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4315
229
00
00
83
228
00
02
52
227
00
02
10
226
00
00
36
ijklh;k djdkFkh
477 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
72
rIik % lkFkh;ko
490
00
03
51
489
00
09
00
488 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
81
487
00
01
24
486
00
10
62
485 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
81
481
00
00
49
483 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
36
484
00
11
70
499 ¼dsuky½
00
14
58
838
00
04
72
833
00
10
71
834
00
00
36
830
00
00
36
832
00
18
18
835
00
11
88
826
00
00
60
825 ¼jksM½
00
00
90
629
00
06
30
511 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
72
510
00
01
19
508
00
02
32
509
00
07
02
507
00
10
26
506&909
00
08
64
825 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
66
506
00
06
02
505
00
01
36
504
00
01
28
444
00
00
39
443
00
00
36
442
00
09
35
441
00
06
30
440
00
12
06
439
00
01
71
438
00
00
36
437 ¼jksM½
00
01
17
436 ¼jksM½
00
02
43
46
00
00
36
45
00
06
48
44 ¼jksM½
00
01
03
43
00
13
05
42
00
00
88
40 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
91
41
00
04
52
37
00
04
50
36
00
09
96
34 ¼pdjksM½
00
00
49
33
00
02
87
¹iQk- la- vkj&25011@23@2013&vksvkj&Iº
iou oqQekj] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 5th August, 2013
S.O. 1624.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest
that a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited in Tehsil Salempur, Dist. Deoria in the State
of Uttar Pradesh for ‘Siwan to Baitalpur Pipeline’ for the transportation of Petroleum Product;
And, whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary
to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which is described
in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals
Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares
its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on
which the copies of the notification issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the
Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user
therein for laying of the pipeline under the land, to Shri Umakant Tripathi B.A.S. & Competent Authority, Indian
Oil Corporation Limited. (Pipelines Division), Subedargunj, P.O: Pipalgaon, District: Allahabad, Pin – 211012,
State: Uttar Pradesh.
4316
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
SCHEDULE
Tehsil : Salempur
Dist. : Deoria
State : Uttar Pradesh
Mouja / Village
Survey/BlockNo.
Sub-Div-No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
DANAUR
1066
00
16
56
Tappa : Bhatni
1065
00
00
54
1067
00
04
23
1076
00
00
36
1075
00
04
23
1074
00
00
36
1073
00
00
36
1084
00
00
36
1080
00
00
36
1087
00
00
36
1078
00
16
74
1079
00
08
37
964
00
07
38
1077
00
00
36
965
00
13
31
963
00
00
69
962
00
06
66
961
00
02
66
960
00
00
36
966
00
00
36
885(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
76
878
00
00
74
876
00
06
48
875
00
05
76
874
00
18
54
870(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
77
864(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
36
861
00
00
36
866
00
09
27
865
00
11
70
855
00
03
28
854
00
04
52
852
00
06
25
851
00
00
36
848(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
63
846
00
06
57
845
00
07
18
844
00
13
32
843
00
05
02
842
00
04
68
835
00
08
46
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4317
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4318
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
836
00
07
20
834
00
00
36
833(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
63
832
00
14
58
829
00
00
37
828
00
00
36
SAVREJI
1245
00
00
36
Tappa : Bhatni
1242
00
00
38
1241
00
03
71
1238
00
18
03
1237(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
68
1234
00
09
25
1232
00
00
36
1226
00
01
54
1225
00
00
59
1224
00
04
95
1227
00
00
52
1223
00
02
02
1221
00
03
36
1222
00
08
39
1163
00
09
41
1162
00
00
62
1161
00
17
22
1159
00
03
95
1157
00
00
87
1153
00
00
36
1158
00
02
41
1149
00
02
58
1152
00
02
95
1151
00
00
36
1150
00
06
58
1146
00
02
11
1145(CART TRACK)
00
00
52
1143
00
05
48
1142
00
03
27
1139
00
07
19
1140
00
02
60
1102
00
08
92
1103
00
17
04
1101
00
00
88
919(ROAD)
00
01
50
542
00
00
36
528
00
10
45
530
00
04
58
581
00
18
74
537
00
00
36
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4319
531
00
00
36
536
00
02
78
532
00
07
05
535
00
01
17
533
00
14
10
521
00
01
61
520
00
10
24
519
00
00
67
500
00
02
69
496(CHAK ROAD)
00
01
25
467
00
00
27
462(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
17
460
00
06
85
461
00
00
91
459
00
10
51
458
00
02
67
453
00
04
71
454
00
08
08
451
00
03
79
450
00
00
90
446
00
00
36
445(ROAD)
00
00
74
414
00
21
89
412
00
06
04
411
00
03
25
410
00
02
87
302(CHAK ROAD)
00
01
21
106
00
01
72
105
00
00
36
107
00
00
36
77
00
11
55
75
00
00
36
78/1606
00
02
71
76
00
04
92
78
00
18
72
73(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
69
78/1623
00
00
36
60
00
01
60
61
00
00
36
62
00
06
57
63
00
00
36
65
00
01
40
64
00
00
36
66
00
08
06
48
00
00
36
47
00
10
59
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4320
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
44(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
60
30
00
05
01
29
00
02
27
28
00
03
62
BHARHE
1309 (CHAK ROAD)
00
01
03
CHOURA
1305
00
00
90
Tappa : Ghati
1303
00
15
50
1300
00
07
39
1299
00
00
11
1301
00
02
17
1288
00
00
36
1290
00
05
89
1289
00
09
34
1285
00
00
36
1284
00
08
26
1283
00
06
68
1282(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
99
1278
00
03
15
1279(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
72
1281
00
02
67
1280
00
05
55
1274(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
68
350
00
00
28
351
00
07
24
353
00
14
07
352
00
03
97
354(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
90
359
00
02
95
355
00
11
03
356
00
03
35
345(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
75
344
00
06
11
341(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
74
340
00
06
49
333
00
05
21
316(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
53
204
00
00
36
203
00
11
74
202
00
00
55
CHANDOULI
87(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
59
Tappa : Ghati
83
00
14
96
59
00
03
44
82A
00
09
02
81
00
00
36
80
00
03
65
79
00
00
69
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4321
98(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
44
77
00
04
04
78
00
14
72
71B
00
01
47
71A
00
00
36
69B
00
12
50
69A
00
00
36
43(ROAD)
00
00
77
6
00
19
79
3
00
12
10
4
00
00
99
1B
00
04
98
1A
00
12
64
USKA
1021
00
01
98
Tappa : Ghati
1020
00
10
08
1019
00
02
35
1018
00
12
60
1017
00
00
36
996(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
90
993
00
07
02
997
00
01
44
985(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
42
983
00
17
64
984
00
37
31
979(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
72
894
00
00
36
902
00
03
51
909
00
00
36
901
00
10
26
910
00
00
36
872
00
04
86
870
00
12
60
871
00
00
54
868
00
08
59
867
00
10
24
866
00
10
80
864
00
10
08
BEHRA DABER
615
00
07
25
Tappa : Ghati
613
00
10
93
610
00
01
54
609
00
00
36
611
00
08
89
607(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
72
546
00
20
34
557
00
02
31
556
00
01
93
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4322
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
555
00
09
77
560
00
00
64
554
00
13
18
553
00
02
68
542(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
54
521
00
02
28
522
00
00
36
520
00
06
97
519
00
00
19
518
00
01
84
517
00
02
50
515
00
10
98
516
00
03
16
514
00
06
48
512
00
13
36
508
00
13
70
507
00
00
36
TENUA
305
00
01
19
Tappa : Ghati
304
00
06
96
303
00
02
95
302
00
07
83
301
00
03
96
300
00
02
10
284(ROAD)
00
00
71
283
00
00
36
282
00
06
70
281
00
04
95
280
00
09
83
279
00
02
58
267(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
58
258
00
06
21
256
00
00
36
259
00
04
10
261
00
01
20
262
00
05
64
263
00
19
80
228
00
05
72
227
00
07
08
226
00
07
02
225
00
03
50
218
00
01
30
224
00
01
74
223
00
04
88
222
00
00
41
220
00
03
29
221
00
03
24
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4323
3
00
02
88
JIGNA DIKSIT
599(ROAD)
00
00
67
Tappa : Ghati
600
00
06
15
598(CHAK ROAD)
00
01
15
597
00
19
01
596
00
18
45
595
00
02
38
568(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
67
560
00
01
15
559
00
09
04
553(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
65
551
00
07
31
550
00
04
81
548(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
63
482
00
04
59
483
00
09
99
479
00
05
49
478(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
63
476
00
00
36
475
00
15
39
472(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
63
466
00
18
95
463(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
72
462
00
11
65
455
00
19
35
454
00
04
88
453
00
00
36
339(CART TRAK)
00
01
55
328
00
00
36
327
00
13
82
326
00
19
35
325
00
00
36
MISHROULI DIKSIT Tappa : Ghati
1055
00
13
59
1058
00
08
89
1061
00
05
96
1062
00
05
54
1064
00
07
31
1065
00
02
25
1066
00
00
81
1025(ROAD)
00
05
76
1010-1239
00
01
16
1010-1238
00
00
99
1010-1240
00
04
65
1007(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
53
1005
00
02
85
1006
00
06
49
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4324
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1004
00
03
78
985(CART TRACK)
00
02
70
903
00
07
74
904
00
00
36
908
00
06
88
909
00
00
36
913
00
07
06
910
00
03
23
912
00
06
56
918
00
00
36
919
00
04
38
911
00
03
96
595
00
03
82
920
00
00
36
420-1232(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
63
420
00
23
29
419
00
01
43
421
00
05
72
422(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
70
423
00
06
00
424
00
12
35
427(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
63
431
00
15
48
430
00
00
41
435
00
17
64
437(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
54
441
00
06
45
442
00
07
89
446
00
07
38
447(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
63
457
00
17
28
459
00
05
72
460
00
00
44
461
00
00
36
MISHROULI BAID Tappa : Ghati
67
00
01
08
73
00
00
27
69
00
10
21
68
00
14
85
70
00
00
30
67(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
72
64
00
11
75
65
00
00
43
63
00
05
89
CHHOTI GANDAK RIVER
00
02
75
BIRSINGHPUR
67(RIVER)
00
13
23
Tappa:Barsipar
68
00
04
50
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4325
87
00
02
16
91
00
01
23
90
00
02
95
89
00
05
31
88
00
01
87
85
00
00
18
83
00
00
54
92
00
00
36
82
00
31
14
80(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
36
79
00
00
36
81
00
14
09
47(ROAD)
00
00
67
42
00
15
93
44(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
90
24
00
13
77
27
00
14
87
28
00
05
47
14
00
22
32
11(CART TRACK)
00
00
63
10(CART TRACK)
00
00
63
5
00
22
32
3
00
04
41
2
00
22
32
PARSOUNI
96
00
00
41
Tappa:Barsipar
95
00
12
42
JIRASO
395
00
01
26
Tappa:Barsipar
396
00
07
00
397
00
00
36
394
00
06
27
393
00
12
24
388(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
54
377
00
18
81
378(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
54
366
00
10
30
369
00
02
00
367
00
00
36
368
00
11
29
358(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
72
350
00
07
58
343(CHAK ROAD)
00
01
03
334
00
00
82
339
00
14
58
340(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
63
342
00
00
58
341
00
14
58
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4326
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
103(ROAD)
00
00
72
69
00
07
02
63
00
13
86
62
00
22
68
49
00
17
82
44
00
07
06
43
00
05
40
42
00
03
12
PIPARA DEVRAJ
142
00
00
68
141
00
06
12
Tappa:Barsipar
136
00
07
56
135
00
08
64
134
00
07
83
133
00
07
92
132(CART TRACK)
00
00
54
102
00
13
59
103
00
05
76
115
00
00
36
104
00
04
80
106(CHAK ROAD)
00
01
30
105
00
00
96
107
00
09
02
108
00
00
36
CHAK ROAD
00
00
54
94
00
16
20
91
00
00
86
90
00
19
98
CHAK ROAD
00
00
54
CHAK ROAD
00
00
54
69
00
05
49
68
00
02
52
67
00
00
36
62
00
09
57
63
00
05
83
60(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
82
59
00
09
00
68(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
81
BASDEV CHAK
128(ROAD)
00
01
13
Tappa:
126
00
00
36
Sathiyav
109
00
08
82
108
00
00
96
110
00
06
57
111
00
00
84
112
00
00
36
113
00
05
94
114
00
03
06
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4327
115
00
02
22
116
00
00
36
107(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
98
105
00
01
53
106
00
01
54
97(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
45
91
00
06
15
90
00
00
36
92
00
02
55
93
00
03
70
94
00
03
33
95
00
00
36
12(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
63
11(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
63
55
00
04
05
54(CHAK ROAD)
00
01
19
56
00
00
36
53
00
07
97
52
00
02
04
49
00
01
53
50
00
06
56
47
00
03
28
46
00
03
15
45
00
06
30
44(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
36
43(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
36
AMUVA
463(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
62
Tappa:
464
00
01
83
Sathiyav
462
00
08
37
461
00
12
60
458(CHAK ROAD)
00
01
26
455
00
02
70
452
00
03
42
453
00
02
01
451
00
09
00
449
00
25
11
448
00
08
19
447
00
09
36
446(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
54
445
00
04
27
443
00
05
31
442
00
00
36
440
00
14
72
441
00
01
72
439
00
01
53
433(CANAL)
00
06
48
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4328
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
259
00
03
87
258
00
16
02
256
00
01
45
255
00
00
36
248
00
00
36
109(CHAK ROAD)
00
01
08
510(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
36
110
00
14
58
108
00
14
18
107(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
54
87
00
05
94
89
00
02
72
90
00
00
36
88
00
04
14
92
00
00
36
86
00
11
70
85
00
01
02
84
00
00
36
83(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
54
82
00
15
03
80
00
07
92
79
00
12
24
76
00
16
20
47(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
45
75
00
00
36
39
00
00
36
25(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
54
24
00
05
04
23
00
04
50
22
00
02
70
38
00
00
36
20
00
21
96
21
00
02
16
19(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
54
2
00
00
36
1
00
14
31
PIPRA
293
00
01
11
SHUKLA
292(CHAK ROAD)
00
01
89
Tappa:
290
00
16
92
Sathiyav
291
00
00
36
287
00
08
03
288
00
00
36
286
00
09
81
257(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
81
248
00
41
40
247(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
34
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4329
244
00
00
36
207(ROAD)
00
01
66
122(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
59
121
00
19
44
113(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
63
83
00
03
36
82
00
24
32
81
00
00
36
78
00
00
36
79(CHAK ROAD)
00
02
43
74
00
06
50
72
00
32
85
88(NALA)
00
01
98
ACHAULA
292
00
05
63
Tappa:
293
00
05
02
Sathiyav
302(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
42
303
00
03
15
291(CHAK ROAD)
00
01
10
266
00
00
36
267
00
01
24
268(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
34
273
00
13
77
271
00
04
25
272
00
05
39
270
00
05
28
276
00
09
00
250(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
72
233
00
00
36
231
00
05
55
232
00
00
36
230
00
04
68
229
00
00
83
228
00
02
52
227
00
02
10
226
00
00
36
PARASIA
477(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
72
KARAKATHI
490
00
03
51
Tappa:
489
00
09
00
Sathiyav
488(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
81
487
00
01
24
486
00
10
62
485(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
81
481
00
00
49
483(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
36
484
00
11
70
499(CANAL)
00
14
58
838
00
04
72
833
00
10
71
834
00
00
36
830
00
00
36
832
00
18
18
835
00
11
88
826
00
00
60
825(ROAD)
00
00
90
629
00
06
30
511(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
72
510
00
01
19
508
00
02
32
509
00
07
02
507
00
10
26
506-909
00
08
64
825(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
66
506
00
06
02
505
00
01
36
504
00
01
28
444
00
00
39
443
00
00
36
442
00
09
35
441
00
06
30
440
00
12
06
439
00
01
71
438
00
00
36
437(ROAD)
00
01
17
436(ROAD)
00
02
43
46
00
00
36
45
00
06
48
44(ROAD)
00
01
03
43
00
13
05
42
00
00
88
40(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
91
41
00
04
52
37
00
04
50
36
00
09
96
34(CHAK ROAD)
00
00
49
33
00
02
87
[F. No. R-25011/23/2013-OR-I]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
4330
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
ubZ fnYyh] 5 vxLr] 2013
dk-vk-
1625-—dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slk izrhr gksrk gS fd yksd fgr esa ;g vko”;d gS fd iVuk ls eksfrgkjh vkSj csrkyiqj
rd isVªksfy;e inkFkks± ds ifjogu gsrq ftyk floku] jkT; fcgkj esa bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkuh
pkfg, A
vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slh ikbiykbu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, vko”;d izrhr gksrk gS fd ml Hkwfe esa ftlds Hkhrj
mDr ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkus dk izLrko gS vkSj tks bl vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa of.kZr gS] mi;ksx dk vtZu fd;k tk,(
vr%] vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbUl ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½ vf/kfu;e] 1962 ¼1962
dk 50½ dh /kkjk 3 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk iznÙk “kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] mDr Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/akdkj dk vtZu djus ds vius
vk”k; dh ?kks’k.kk djrh gS(
dksbZ O;fDr] tks mDr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa fgrc) gS] ml rkjh[k ls ftldks] Hkkjr ds jkti= esa ;Fkk izdkf”kr bl
vf/klwpuk dh izfr;ka lk/kkj.k turk dks miyC/k djk nh tkrh gaS] bDdhl fnu ds vUnj] Hkwfe ds Hkhrj ikbiykbu fcNk, tkus gsrq
mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj ds vtZu ds fy,] Jh v:.k dqekj >k] fc-iz-ls- o l{ke izkf/kdkjh bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs”ku fyfeVsM] ¼ikbiykbu
fMohtu½ iVuk] iks-vks- <syok] flikjk] ftyk iVuk] fiu % 800020] fcgkj dks fyf[kr :i eas vk{ksi Hkst ldsxkA
vuqlwph
ftyk % floku
jkT; % fcgkj
ekStk@xzke
losZ@Cykd@la- (IyksV la-)
lc&Mho&la-
{ks=kiQy
gsDVs;j
vkjs
oxZ ehVj
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
Nhrksyh dyka
2674
00
38
11
Fkkuk uacj&114
2621
00
00
20
2622
00
00
20
2623
00
00
20
2624
00
00
20
2625
00
00
20
2672
00
05
08
2626
00
04
64
2662
00
19
43
2671
00
21
70
2670
00
02
66
2669
00
01
47
2681
00
02
61
2668
00
06
16
2666
00
07
65
2665
00
02
19
2664
00
02
28
2663
00
12
15
2463 ¼jkLrk½
00
01
12
2685
00
02
71
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4331
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4332
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2748
00
02
10
2747
00
01
79
2749
00
06
89
2746
00
00
20
2755
00
01
97
2754
00
16
20
2753
00
00
94
2759
00
06
72
3467
00
08
14
2933
00
02
24
2932
00
02
30
2931
00
07
34
2930
00
16
00
2774
00
00
20
2773
00
00
20
2929
00
00
88
2927
00
02
62
2925
00
00
57
2924
00
00
20
2926
00
02
00
2779
00
09
51
2783
00
05
82
2784
00
05
38
2785
00
01
83
2786
00
00
20
2823
00
06
14
2822
00
03
62
2817
00
16
99
2815
00
18
86
2813
00
05
68
2807
00
00
20
2805
00
05
35
2806
00
04
79
2798
00
02
53
2803
00
06
16
2804
00
00
20
2802
00
09
88
2272
00
09
36
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4333
2270
00
13
41
2267
00
08
16
2266
00
00
20
2256
00
06
22
2265
00
04
18
2382
00
14
56
2383&jkLrk
00
01
29
2385
00
12
49
2201
00
11
85
2200
00
24
85
2199
00
01
87
2211
00
04
92
2210
00
07
00
2208
00
00
20
2213
00
00
20
2209
00
03
73
2214
00
04
76
2215
00
02
84
2216
00
00
20
2219
00
00
87
2220
00
01
90
2107
00
00
20
2109
00
00
20
2110
00
00
20
2111
00
00
71
2218
00
01
45
2221
00
08
45
2108
00
01
18
2222
00
05
17
2223
00
00
77
2226
00
06
55
2224
00
06
87
2095&jkLrk
00
01
13
iqjUnziwj
55&jkLrk
00
02
45
Fkkuk uacj&115
6
00
09
10
7
00
00
20
8
00
02
43
10
00
03
06
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4334
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
9
00
00
20
1
00
27
88
lFkokj
1385
00
06
14
Fkkuk uacj&89
1387
00
17
66
1388
00
03
74
1432
00
00
20
1431
00
01
36
1389
00
08
89
1430
00
02
96
1429
00
01
79
1165
00
00
20
1428
00
10
11
1426
00
03
81
1427
00
00
20
1425
00
00
33
1189
00
07
38
1188
00
00
20
1190
00
00
34
1191
00
02
90
1187
00
00
20
1195
00
04
33
1193
00
01
36
1194
00
04
60
1201
00
00
57
1196
00
00
20
1197
00
00
35
1198
00
03
12
1200
00
02
50
1202
00
00
20
1203
00
00
20
1199
00
02
87
1206
00
06
11
1207
00
01
27
1211
00
01
59
1210
00
00
74
1213
00
01
40
1212
00
00
67
1217
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4335
1216
00
00
93
1214
00
01
43
1215
00
00
20
1209
00
05
30
1226
00
04
22
1229
00
00
81
1230
00
00
20
1235
00
00
20
1227
00
01
52
1228
00
04
40
1249
00
02
08
1248
00
07
11
1245
00
00
20
1246
00
00
20
1247
00
09
55
1255
00
00
20
168
00
00
20
169
00
00
20
165
00
02
18
147
00
03
52
146
00
00
20
151
00
01
31
150
00
02
82
149
00
02
65
148
00
01
57
152
00
03
73
146@1619 ¼jkLrk½
00
02
37
153
00
00
20
chjrh Vksyk
61&jkLrk
00
02
62
Fkkuk uacj&88
210
00
00
20
209
00
00
20
211
00
01
90
214
00
16
96
213
00
01
13
212
00
00
20
215
00
00
20
234
00
00
20
235
00
05
54
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4336
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
236
00
03
24
237
00
02
31
238
00
01
67
239
00
01
73
240
00
02
71
233
00
00
96
339
00
03
02
338
00
00
20
331
00
00
20
330
00
00
20
329
00
00
20
328
00
00
20
327
00
00
20
326
00
00
20
340
00
02
03
341
00
01
61
342
00
03
55
343
00
06
60
318@440
00
00
59
317
00
02
19
316
00
00
20
307&ukyk
00
00
59
306&ukyk
00
04
13
305&ukyk
00
00
53
HkhFkh
217
00
04
30
Fkkuk uacj&86
216
00
00
20
214
00
06
76
207&jkLrk
00
01
23
198
00
03
73
199
00
00
20
200
00
00
40
197
00
05
12
201
00
00
96
192
00
10
10
191
00
04
34
189
00
02
54
188
00
02
32
182
00
03
78
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4337
179
00
04
43
178
00
05
86
177
00
00
20
170
00
00
65
184
00
07
16
183
00
00
20
185
00
09
47
156 ¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
02
52
279
00
14
21
286
00
01
41
285
00
01
92
287
00
02
00
292
00
18
95
350&dPpk jkLrk
00
00
59
351
00
43
44
349
00
03
21
348
00
01
64
346
00
00
25
345
00
00
20
352
00
00
20
356
00
00
56
359
00
00
85
360
00
00
20
357
00
01
80
358
00
00
52
71
00
01
58
70
00
01
93
67
00
01
25
68
00
01
39
69
00
00
39
66 ¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
01
21
64
00
02
15
65
00
02
62
78
00
01
58
63
00
00
84
62
00
01
19
61
00
01
14
60&fQYM psuy
00
00
97
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4338
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
52
00
00
20
59
00
05
06
58
00
00
61
57
00
06
17
56
00
00
76
48 ¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
09
13
604
00
07
86
48@3111
00
20
12
605
00
00
20
606
00
00
20
608
00
00
20
609
00
04
43
610
00
00
20
617
00
00
20
48@3110
00
06
92
626
00
05
16
625
00
09
62
624
00
00
20
627
00
22
80
687
00
01
97
649
00
00
20
650
00
00
20
651
00
00
99
652
00
01
90
653
00
00
20
654
00
05
16
686
00
00
20
685
00
13
71
684
00
02
31
679
00
00
25
681
00
04
39
680
00
00
20
683
00
00
20
682
00
08
44
2160
00
00
20
2161
00
03
02
2162
00
00
20
2164
00
01
25
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4339
2163
00
10
18
2165
00
05
14
2171
00
00
20
2210
00
00
69
2211
00
00
20
2147
00
00
20
2209
00
05
59
2213
00
07
99
2214
00
00
32
2208
00
01
54
2215
00
01
51
2216
00
02
51
2217
00
02
44
2219
00
00
20
2206
00
00
46
2205
00
02
97
2218
00
01
84
2204
00
03
82
2203
00
04
64
2202
00
00
38
2201
00
08
28
2200
00
04
57
2199
00
04
99
2198
00
00
61
2197
00
00
20
2237
00
00
34
2236
00
00
20
2196
00
08
30
2195
00
07
89
2240
00
00
20
2241
00
01
06
2194 ¼fQYM psuy½
00
01
70
2193
00
02
93
2280¼fQYM psuy½
00
00
86
nw/kjk
4090
00
00
43
Fkkuk uacj&73
4089
00
00
20
4092
00
02
68
4093
00
09
73
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4340
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
4094
00
11
09
4095
00
08
32
4099
00
00
28
4098
00
06
85
3137
00
00
97
3133
00
06
49
3132
00
00
61
3134
00
00
20
3131
00
02
50
3130
00
00
20
3124
00
09
33
3122
00
03
42
3121
00
01
15
3120
00
00
20
3119
00
05
93
3116
00
02
03
3117
00
04
80
3118
00
05
60
3106
00
00
37
3159
00
09
30
3160
00
07
99
2391
00
01
28
3098
00
00
20
2390
00
04
75
3161
00
00
73
2392
00
00
30
2389
00
10
84
2394
00
00
20
2388
00
03
44
2406
00
01
44
2407
00
07
67
2408
00
09
68
2410
00
07
36
2377
00
00
20
2376
00
06
13
2375
00
00
79
2374
00
07
18
2372
00
04
89
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4341
2371
00
00
20
2373
00
00
75
2468
00
00
20
2488@4986
00
05
63
2488
00
06
70
2485
00
00
20
2489
00
00
50
2491
00
07
01
2484
00
01
44
2492
00
00
50
2493
00
13
70
2483
00
02
67
2240 ¼Mªsbu½
00
00
83
2503&jkLrk
00
00
84
2227 ¼Mªsbu½
00
01
26
2510
00
06
03
2522
00
00
20
2520
00
00
20
2509
00
02
51
2511
00
07
11
2508
00
00
20
2512
00
04
04
2152
00
01
21
2151
00
04
54
2147
00
04
89
2148
00
03
77
2146
00
04
33
2119
00
00
48
2118
00
03
97
2120
00
05
08
2116
00
00
90
2117
00
00
20
2114
00
00
20
2115
00
06
23
2124
00
01
15
2145
00
01
81
2121
00
00
20
2125
00
04
12
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4342
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2126
00
00
20
2028
00
00
20
2029
00
00
20
2026
00
00
20
2023
00
02
91
2024
00
01
95
2025
00
00
84
2022
00
01
09
2021
00
07
19
2020
00
04
21
2031
00
06
17
2019
00
00
26
2018
00
05
82
2017
00
11
13
1970
00
00
64
1971
00
02
64
1972
00
07
10
2016
00
02
66
2014
00
00
20
1975
00
02
61
1976
00
08
03
1984
00
03
94
1985
00
07
99
1986
00
01
92
1987
00
00
92
1988
00
00
20
1981
00
00
20
1989
00
07
73
1990
00
03
32
1992
00
00
20
1991
00
02
18
1825
00
00
20
1824@4982
00
03
37
1824
00
06
28
1823
00
02
76
1775
00
01
02
1822
00
01
76
1819
00
01
07
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4343
1821
00
00
97
1820
00
04
92
1779
00
00
20
1780
00
00
20
1777
00
00
32
1816
00
00
96
1784
00
04
10
1785
00
04
25
1786
00
00
95
1801
00
00
63
1802
00
00
20
1800
00
10
40
1799
00
01
65
1798
00
00
20
1799@4991
00
04
93
1650&/keM
00
06
29
[koliqj
399
00
04
62
Fkkuk uacj&74
400
00
04
96
401
00
00
20
406
00
04
55
397
00
06
75
409
00
00
20
396
00
04
46
395
00
00
20
410
00
00
27
394
00
01
35
393
00
00
20
376
00
06
39
377
00
09
43
378
00
07
64
379
00
01
89
383
00
01
80
382
00
05
62
381
00
01
23
388
00
00
20
384
00
06
75
46
00
00
88
47
00
12
08
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4344
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
49
00
01
44
48
00
11
15
57
00
00
20
78¼jkLrk½
00
03
15
109
00
09
96
99
00
06
60
106
00
01
31
100
00
00
38
105
00
06
91
103
00
02
20
104
00
03
88
93
00
04
09
123
00
03
13
122
00
00
20
92
00
00
20
124
00
04
97
125
00
02
22
91
00
08
92
90
00
03
83
89
00
00
20
85
00
00
20
86
00
05
75
87
00
06
66
88
00
11
45
4003
00
00
61
4
00
03
87
fldkfV;k
1257
00
03
12
Fkkuk uacj&63
1258
00
05
60
1259
00
13
36
1301
00
01
03
1300
00
00
20
1267
00
00
29
1268
00
02
74
1270
00
04
64
1271
00
01
81
1272
00
01
56
1274
00
03
98
1297
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4345
1275
00
07
85
1276
00
07
18
1281
00
03
29
1282
00
00
20
1283
00
00
20
1278
00
01
17
1280
00
00
61
1279
00
03
36
2025
00
07
11
2022
00
03
45
2024
00
02
13
2021
00
00
32
2023
00
03
13
2018
00
04
44
2004
00
03
55
2006
00
00
20
2003
00
00
20
tykyiqj
197
00
01
69
Fkkuk uacj&62
196
00
04
83
195
00
12
22
194
00
03
74
218
00
00
76
193 ¼jkLrk½
00
03
85
182
00
07
20
192
00
00
20
184
00
03
75
183
00
02
66
185
00
02
06
176
00
00
27
179
00
00
56
177
00
03
42
178
00
04
20
161
00
16
41
170
00
00
20
162
00
04
85
164
00
01
67
163
00
01
09
149
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4346
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
145
00
06
08
144
00
00
20
140
00
00
20
147
00
00
62
146
00
08
24
82
00
00
20
139
00
00
35
83
00
08
28
84
00
02
73
81
00
06
78
85
00
00
20
89
00
02
83
88
00
00
20
80
00
01
93
93
00
01
82
92
00
00
59
90
00
00
20
79
00
00
20
94
00
02
96
95
00
00
20
96
00
03
53
36
00
08
62
35
00
11
03
34
00
00
20
33
00
01
58
32
00
07
84
2
00
01
51
30
00
08
06
5
00
01
37
4
00
00
20
6
00
04
87
7
00
00
03
8
00
04
59
9
00
02
13
11
00
02
12
Mqejk
2877
00
05
59
Fkkuk uacj&58
2873
00
00
20
2883
00
11
79
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4347
2884
00
00
20
2882
00
08
71
2881
00
00
20
2891
00
03
70
2890
00
05
14
2889
00
00
20
2896
00
00
20
2892
00
00
66
2893
00
03
10
2894
00
02
05
2895
00
02
75
2842
00
07
35
2942
00
14
63
2941
00
00
20
2943
00
13
21
2945¼jkLrk½
00
01
60
2958
00
16
43
2957
00
00
20
2970
00
07
39
2971
00
00
20
2969
00
10
15
2972
00
00
70
2968
00
00
31
2974
00
05
30
2975
00
02
88
2976
00
08
46
2978
00
00
20
2977
00
01
75
2985 ¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
01
94
3003
00
00
20
3002
00
12
06
3001
00
00
38
2994
00
07
89
2993
00
00
20
2991
00
00
20
2990
00
03
98
2989
00
01
80
2995
00
00
61
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4348
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2996
00
00
20
2988
00
02
47
2987
00
00
20
2997
00
06
56
3068
00
07
59
2998
00
00
32
3062
00
00
20
3067
00
05
62
3065
00
00
20
3070
00
03
01
3069
00
00
20
3071
00
03
41
3076
00
02
53
3077
00
00
20
3072
00
00
20
3075
00
19
21
3074
00
00
41
3082
00
01
23
3084
00
00
61
3083
00
06
15
3086
00
00
20
3092¼jkLrk½
00
01
68
3111¼jkLrk½
00
00
95
3112¼jkLrk½
00
01
45
4594
00
01
58
4501
00
07
04
4502
00
00
20
3377
00
08
34
4499
00
00
20
3378
00
09
82
4498
00
00
20
4495
00
00
20
3375
00
00
20
3382
00
00
20
3379
00
06
68
3380
00
05
70
3381
00
06
47
3383
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4349
3384
00
00
20
3385
00
00
20
3387
00
00
64
3386
00
07
05
3385
00
00
20
3346
00
03
26
3388
00
03
13
3345
00
03
14
3222
00
02
36
3321
00
16
44
3320
00
00
20
3323
00
00
20
3325
00
01
15
3326
00
03
34
3318
00
04
35
3317
00
16
01
3333
00
00
71
3334
00
01
18
3335
00
01
49
3521
00
03
74
3519
00
04
77
3518
00
03
87
3524
00
03
03
3523
00
02
22
3530
00
03
65
3526
00
00
42
3527
00
00
30
3528
00
00
34
3529
00
02
72
3602
00
06
66
3603
00
02
55
3606
00
02
57
3611
00
02
65
3620
00
03
01
3616
00
03
38
3613
00
00
20
3614
00
00
20
3615
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4350
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
3618
00
00
20
3617
00
03
46
3625
00
00
20
3627
00
00
20
3626
00
12
23
3680
00
05
80
3647
00
00
20
3679
00
08
08
3648
00
00
20
3678
00
01
75
3677
00
08
62
3676
00
05
98
3675
00
00
20
3673
00
00
20
3672
00
06
52
3791
00
17
46
3796
00
00
20
3795
00
00
20
3794
00
00
20
3792
00
03
50
3793
00
00
20
3818
00
04
80
3817
00
07
86
3816
00
00
20
3890
00
07
75
3889
00
00
20
3885
00
18
36
3886
00
00
20
3891
00
03
19
3892
00
00
20
3884
00
17
08
5392
00
06
16
5389
00
01
96
5391
00
05
59
5393
00
00
20
5390
00
01
41
5394
00
01
28
5395
00
04
65
5398
00
03
98
5397
00
00
41
5399
00
00
20
5400
00
00
20
5469
00
00
39
5468
00
00
20
5467
00
00
20
5466
00
00
20
5470
00
01
85
5471
00
00
92
5474
00
00
20
5472
00
03
96
5473
00
02
19
5462
00
03
99
5461
00
04
55
5460
00
00
20
5459
00
03
84
5475
00
00
20
5457
00
02
95
5456
00
00
20
5458
00
07
99
5477
00
02
55
5452
00
03
23
5478
00
00
26
5755
00
01
09
5881
00
07
56
5487¼jkLrk½
00
01
80
5497
00
10
29
5496
00
00
20
5495
00
00
20
5494
00
11
95
5497
00
06
37
¹iQk- la- vkj&25011@15@2013&vksvkj&Iº
iou oqQekj] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 5th August, 2013
S.O. 1625.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest
that a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited in Dist. Siwan in the State of Bihar for ‘Patna
to Motihari and Baitalpur Pipeline’ for the transportation of Petroleum Product;
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4351
And, whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is
necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which
is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum
and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government
hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the
date on which the copies of the notification issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as
published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of
the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land, to Shri Arun Kumar Jha B.A.S. & Competent
Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited. (Pipelines Division) P.O. Dhelwan, Sipara, Dist. Patna (Bihar.)
Pin – 800020.
SCHEDULE
Dist.: Siwan
State : Bihar
Mouja / Village
Survey/Block No.
Sub-Div.-No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
CHHITAULI KALAN
2674
00
38
11
Thana No. 114
2621
00
00
20
2622
00
00
20
2623
00
00
20
2624
00
00
20
2625
00
00
20
2672
00
05
08
2626
00
04
64
2662
00
19
43
2671
00
21
70
2670
00
02
66
2669
00
01
47
2681
00
02
61
2668
00
06
16
2666
00
07
65
2665
00
02
19
2664
00
02
28
2663
00
12
15
2463 (Road)
00
01
12
4352
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4353
2685
00
02
71
2748
00
02
10
2747
00
01
79
2749
00
06
89
2746
00
00
20
2755
00
01
97
2754
00
16
20
2753
00
00
94
2759
00
06
72
3467
00
08
14
2933
00
02
24
2932
00
02
30
2931
00
07
34
2930
00
16
00
2774
00
00
20
2773
00
00
20
2929
00
00
88
2927
00
02
62
2925
00
00
57
2924
00
00
20
2926
00
02
00
2779
00
09
51
2783
00
05
82
2784
00
05
38
2785
00
01
83
2786
00
00
20
2823
00
06
14
2822
00
03
62
2817
00
16
99
2815
00
18
86
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4354
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2813
00
05
68
2807
00
00
20
2805
00
05
35
2806
00
04
79
2798
00
02
53
2803
00
06
16
2804
00
00
20
2802
00
09
88
2272
00
09
36
2270
00
13
41
2267
00
08
16
2266
00
00
20
2256
00
06
22
2265
00
04
18
2382
00
14
56
2383-Road
00
01
29
2385
00
12
49
2201
00
11
85
2200
00
24
85
2199
00
01
87
2211
00
04
92
2210
00
07
00
2208
00
00
20
2213
00
00
20
2209
00
03
73
2214
00
04
76
2215
00
02
84
2216
00
00
20
2219
00
00
87
2220
00
01
90
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4355
2107
00
00
20
2109
00
00
20
2110
00
00
20
2111
00
00
71
2218
00
01
45
2221
00
08
45
2108
00
01
18
2222
00
05
17
2223
00
00
77
2226
00
06
55
2224
00
06
87
2095-Road
00
01
13
PURANDRPUR
55-Road
00
02
45
Thana No-115
6
00
09
10
7
00
00
20
8
00
02
43
10
00
03
06
9
00
00
20
1
00
27
88
SATHWAR
1385
00
06
14
Thana No-89
1387
00
17
66
1388
00
03
74
1432
00
00
20
1431
00
01
36
1389
00
08
89
1430
00
02
96
1429
00
01
79
1165
00
00
20
1428
00
10
11
1426
00
03
81
1427
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4356
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1425
00
00
33
1189
00
07
38
1188
00
00
20
1190
00
00
34
1191
00
02
90
1187
00
00
20
1195
00
04
33
1193
00
01
36
1194
00
04
60
1201
00
00
57
1196
00
00
20
1197
00
00
35
1198
00
03
12
1200
00
02
50
1202
00
00
20
1203
00
00
20
1199
00
02
87
1206
00
06
11
1207
00
01
27
1211
00
01
59
1210
00
00
74
1213
00
01
40
1212
00
00
67
1217
00
00
20
1216
00
00
93
1214
00
01
43
1215
00
00
20
1209
00
05
30
1226
00
04
22
1229
00
00
81
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4357
1230
00
00
20
1235
00
00
20
1227
00
01
52
1228
00
04
40
1249
00
02
08
1248
00
07
11
1245
00
00
20
1246
00
00
20
1247
00
09
55
1255
00
00
20
168
00
00
20
169
00
00
20
165
00
02
18
147
00
03
52
146
00
00
20
151
00
01
31
150
00
02
82
149
00
02
65
148
00
01
57
152
00
03
73
146/1619 (ROAD)
00
02
37
153
00
00
20
BIRTI TOLA
61-Road
00
02
62
Thana No-88
210
00
00
20
209
00
00
20
211
00
01
90
214
00
16
96
213
00
01
13
212
00
00
20
215
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4358
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
234
00
00
20
235
00
05
54
236
00
03
24
237
00
02
31
238
00
01
67
239
00
01
73
240
00
02
71
233
00
00
96
339
00
03
02
338
00
00
20
331
00
00
20
330
00
00
20
329
00
00
20
328
00
00
20
327
00
00
20
326
00
00
20
340
00
02
03
341
00
01
61
342
00
03
55
343
00
06
60
318/440
00
00
59
317
00
02
19
316
00
00
20
307-Nala
00
00
59
306-Nala
00
04
13
305-Nala
00
00
53
BHITHI
217
00
04
30
Thana No-86
216
00
00
20
214
00
06
76
207-Road
00
01
23
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4359
198
00
03
73
199
00
00
20
200
00
00
40
197
00
05
12
201
00
00
96
192
00
10
10
191
00
04
34
189
00
02
54
188
00
02
32
182
00
03
78
179
00
04
43
178
00
05
86
177
00
00
20
170
00
00
65
184
00
07
16
183
00
00
20
185
00
09
47
156 (Cart track)
00
02
52
279
00
14
21
286
00
01
41
285
00
01
92
287
00
02
00
292
00
18
95
350-Cart track
00
00
59
351
00
43
44
349
00
03
21
348
00
01
64
346
00
00
25
345
00
00
20
352
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4360
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
356
00
00
56
359
00
00
85
360
00
00
20
357
00
01
80
358
00
00
52
71
00
01
58
70
00
01
93
67
00
01
25
68
00
01
39
69
00
00
39
66 (Cart track)
00
01
21
64
00
02
15
65
00
02
62
78
00
01
58
63
00
00
84
62
00
01
19
61
00
01
14
60-Field Channel
00
00
97
52
00
00
20
59
00
05
06
58
00
00
61
57
00
06
17
56
00
00
76
48 (Cart Track)
00
09
13
604
00
07
86
48/3111
00
20
12
605
00
00
20
606
00
00
20
608
00
00
20
609
00
04
43
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4361
610
00
00
20
617
00
00
20
48/3110
00
06
92
626
00
05
16
625
00
09
62
624
00
00
20
627
00
22
80
687
00
01
97
649
00
00
20
650
00
00
20
651
00
00
99
652
00
01
90
653
00
00
20
654
00
05
16
686
00
00
20
685
00
13
71
684
00
02
31
679
00
00
25
681
00
04
39
680
00
00
20
683
00
00
20
682
00
08
44
2160
00
00
20
2161
00
03
02
2162
00
00
20
2164
00
01
25
2163
00
10
18
2165
00
05
14
2171
00
00
20
2210
00
00
69
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4362
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2211
00
00
20
2147
00
00
20
2209
00
05
59
2213
00
07
99
2214
00
00
32
2208
00
01
54
2215
00
01
51
2216
00
02
51
2217
00
02
44
2219
00
00
20
2206
00
00
46
2205
00
02
97
2218
00
01
84
2204
00
03
82
2203
00
04
64
2202
00
00
38
2201
00
08
28
2200
00
04
57
2199
00
04
99
2198
00
00
61
2197
00
00
20
2237
00
00
34
2236
00
00
20
2196
00
08
30
2195
00
07
89
2240
00
00
20
2241
00
01
06
2194 (Field Channel)
00
01
70
2193
00
02
93
2280-Field Channel
00
00
86
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4363
DUDHRA
4090
00
00
43
Thana No-73
4089
00
00
20
4092
00
02
68
4093
00
09
73
4094
00
11
09
4095
00
08
32
4099
00
00
28
4098
00
06
85
3137
00
00
97
3133
00
06
49
3132
00
00
61
3134
00
00
20
3131
00
02
50
3130
00
00
20
3124
00
09
33
3122
00
03
42
3121
00
01
15
3120
00
00
20
3119
00
05
93
3116
00
02
03
3117
00
04
80
3118
00
05
60
3106
00
00
37
3159
00
09
30
3160
00
07
99
2391
00
01
28
3098
00
00
20
2390
00
04
75
3161
00
00
73
2392
00
00
30
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4364
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2389
00
10
84
2394
00
00
20
2388
00
03
44
2406
00
01
44
2407
00
07
67
2408
00
09
68
2410
00
07
36
2377
00
00
20
2376
00
06
13
2375
00
00
79
2374
00
07
18
2372
00
04
89
2371
00
00
20
2373
00
00
75
2468
00
00
20
2488/4986
00
05
63
2488
00
06
70
2485
00
00
20
2489
00
00
50
2491
00
07
01
2484
00
01
44
2492
00
00
50
2493
00
13
70
2483
00
02
67
2240 (DRAIN)
00
00
83
2503-ROAD
00
00
84
2227 (DRAIN)
00
01
26
2510
00
06
03
2522
00
00
20
2520
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4365
2509
00
02
51
2511
00
07
11
2508
00
00
20
2512
00
04
04
2152
00
01
21
2151
00
04
54
2147
00
04
89
2148
00
03
77
2146
00
04
33
2119
00
00
48
2118
00
03
97
2120
00
05
08
2116
00
00
90
2117
00
00
20
2114
00
00
20
2115
00
06
23
2124
00
01
15
2145
00
01
81
2121
00
00
20
2125
00
04
12
2126
00
00
20
2028
00
00
20
2029
00
00
20
2026
00
00
20
2023
00
02
91
2024
00
01
95
2025
00
00
84
2022
00
01
09
2021
00
07
19
2020
00
04
21
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4366
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2031
00
06
17
2019
00
00
26
2018
00
05
82
2017
00
11
13
1970
00
00
64
1971
00
02
64
1972
00
07
10
2016
00
02
66
2014
00
00
20
1975
00
02
61
1976
00
08
03
1984
00
03
94
1985
00
07
99
1986
00
01
92
1987
00
00
92
1988
00
00
20
1981
00
00
20
1989
00
07
73
1990
00
03
32
1992
00
00
20
1991
00
02
18
1825
00
00
20
1824/4982
00
03
37
1824
00
06
28
1823
00
02
76
1775
00
01
02
1822
00
01
76
1819
00
01
07
1821
00
00
97
1820
00
04
92
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4367
1779
00
00
20
1780
00
00
20
1777
00
00
32
1816
00
00
96
1784
00
04
10
1785
00
04
25
1786
00
00
95
1801
00
00
63
1802
00
00
20
1800
00
10
40
1799
00
01
65
1798
00
00
20
1799/4991
00
04
93
1650-Dhamai Nadi
00
06
29
KHAWASPUR
399
00
04
62
Thana No. -74
400
00
04
96
401
00
00
20
406
00
04
55
397
00
06
75
409
00
00
20
396
00
04
46
395
00
00
20
410
00
00
27
394
00
01
35
393
00
00
20
376
00
06
39
377
00
09
43
378
00
07
64
379
00
01
89
383
00
01
80
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4368
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
382
00
05
62
381
00
01
23
388
00
00
20
384
00
06
75
46
00
00
88
47
00
12
08
49
00
01
44
48
00
11
15
57
00
00
20
78 (ROAD)
00
03
15
109
00
09
96
99
00
06
60
106
00
01
31
100
00
00
38
105
00
06
91
103
00
02
20
104
00
03
88
93
00
04
09
123
00
03
13
122
00
00
20
92
00
00
20
124
00
04
97
125
00
02
22
91
00
08
92
90
00
03
83
89
00
00
20
85
00
00
20
86
00
05
75
87
00
06
66
88
00
11
45
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4369
4003
00
00
61
4
00
03
87
SIKATIA
1257
00
03
12
Thana No. -63
1258
00
05
60
1259
00
13
36
1301
00
01
03
1300
00
00
20
1267
00
00
29
1268
00
02
74
1270
00
04
64
1271
00
01
81
1272
00
01
56
1274
00
03
98
1297
00
00
20
1275
00
07
85
1276
00
07
18
1281
00
03
29
1282
00
00
20
1283
00
00
20
1278
00
01
17
1280
00
00
61
1279
00
03
36
2025
00
07
11
2022
00
03
45
2024
00
02
13
2021
00
00
32
2023
00
03
13
2018
00
04
44
2004
00
03
55
2006
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4370
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2003
00
00
20
JALALPUR
197
00
01
69
Thana No. -62
196
00
04
83
195
00
12
22
194
00
03
74
218
00
00
76
193(ROAD)
00
03
85
182
00
07
20
192
00
00
20
184
00
03
75
183
00
02
66
185
00
02
06
176
00
00
27
179
00
00
56
177
00
03
42
178
00
04
20
161
00
16
41
170
00
00
20
162
00
04
85
164
00
01
67
163
00
01
09
149
00
00
20
145
00
06
08
144
00
00
20
140
00
00
20
147
00
00
62
146
00
08
24
82
00
00
20
139
00
00
35
83
00
08
28
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4371
84
00
02
73
81
00
06
78
85
00
00
20
89
00
02
83
88
00
00
20
80
00
01
93
93
00
01
82
92
00
00
59
90
00
00
20
79
00
00
20
94
00
02
96
95
00
00
20
96
00
03
53
36
00
08
62
35
00
11
03
34
00
00
20
33
00
01
58
32
00
07
84
2
00
01
51
30
00
08
06
5
00
01
37
4
00
00
20
6
00
04
87
7
00
00
03
8
00
04
59
9
00
02
13
11
00
02
12
DUMRA
2877
00
05
59
Thana No. -85
2873
00
00
20
2883
00
11
79
2884
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4372
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2882
00
08
71
2881
00
00
20
2891
00
03
70
2890
00
05
14
2889
00
00
20
2896
00
00
20
2892
00
00
66
2893
00
03
10
2894
00
02
05
2895
00
02
75
2842
00
07
35
2942
00
14
63
2941
00
00
20
2943
00
13
21
2945(ROAD)
00
01
60
2958
00
16
43
2957
00
00
20
2970
00
07
39
2971
00
00
20
2969
00
10
15
2972
00
00
70
`
2968
00
00
31
2974
00
05
30
2975
00
02
88
2976
00
08
46
2978
00
00
20
2977
00
01
75
2985(CART TRACK)
00
01
94
3003
00
00
20
3002
00
12
06
3001
00
00
38
2994
00
07
89
2993
00
00
20
2991
00
00
20
2990
00
03
98
2989
00
01
80
2995
00
00
61
2996
00
00
20
2988
00
02
47
2987
00
00
20
2997
00
06
56
3068
00
07
59
2998
00
00
32
3062
00
00
20
3067
00
05
62
3065
00
00
20
3070
00
03
01
3069
00
00
20
3071
00
03
41
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4373
3076
00
02
53
3077
00
00
20
3072
00
00
20
3075
00
19
21
3074
00
00
41
3082
00
01
23
3084
00
00
61
3083
00
06
15
3086
00
00
20
3092(ROAD)
00
01
68
3111(ROAD)
00
00
95
3112(ROAD)
00
01
45
4594
00
01
58
4501
00
07
04
4502
00
00
20
3377
00
08
34
4499
00
00
20
3378
00
09
82
4498
00
00
20
4495
00
00
20
3375
00
00
20
3382
00
00
20
3379
00
06
68
3380
00
05
70
3381
00
06
47
3383
00
00
20
3384
00
00
20
3385
00
00
20
3387
00
00
64
3386
00
07
05
3385
00
00
20
3346
00
03
26
3388
00
03
13
3345
00
03
14
3222
00
02
36
3321
00
16
44
3320
00
00
20
3323
00
00
20
3325
00
01
15
3326
00
03
34
3318
00
04
35
3317
00
16
01
3333
00
00
71
3334
00
01
18
3335
00
01
49
3521
00
03
74
3519
00
04
77
3518
00
03
87
3524
00
03
03
3523
00
02
22
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4374
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
3530
00
03
65
3526
00
00
42
3527
00
00
30
3528
00
00
34
3529
00
02
72
3602
00
06
66
3603
00
02
55
3606
00
02
57
3611
00
02
65
3620
00
03
01
3616
00
03
38
3613
00
00
20
3614
00
00
20
3615
00
00
20
3618
00
00
20
3617
00
03
46
3625
00
00
20
3627
00
00
20
3626
00
12
23
3680
00
05
80
3647
00
00
20
3679
00
08
08
3648
00
00
20
3678
00
01
75
3677
00
08
62
3676
00
05
98
3675
00
00
20
3673
00
00
20
3672
00
06
52
3791
00
17
46
3796
00
00
20
3795
00
00
20
3794
00
00
20
3792
00
03
50
3793
00
00
20
3818
00
04
80
3817
00
07
86
3816
00
00
20
3890
00
07
75
3889
00
00
20
3885
00
18
36
3886
00
00
20
3891
00
03
19
3892
00
00
20
3884
00
17
08
5392
00
06
16
5389
00
01
96
5391
00
05
59
5393
00
00
20
5390
00
01
41
5394
00
01
28
5395
00
04
65
5398
00
03
98
5397
00
00
41
5399
00
00
20
5400
00
00
20
5469
00
00
39
5468
00
00
20
5467
00
00
20
5466
00
00
20
5470
00
01
85
5471
00
00
92
5474
00
00
20
5472
00
03
96
5473
00
02
19
5462
00
03
99
5461
00
04
55
5460
00
00
20
5459
00
03
84
5475
00
00
20
5457
00
02
95
5456
00
00
20
5458
00
07
99
5477
00
02
55
5452
00
03
23
5478
00
00
26
5755
00
01
09
5881
00
07
56
5487(ROAD)
00
01
80
5497
00
10
29
5496
00
00
20
5495
00
00
20
5494
00
11
95
5497
00
06
37
[F.No. R-25011/15 /2013-OR-I]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4375
ubZ fnYyh] 5 vxLr] 2013
dk-vk- 1626-—dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slk izrhr gksrk gS fd yksdfgr esa ;g vko';d gS fd iVuk ls eksfrgkjh vkSj csrkyiqj rd
isVªksfy;e inkFkks± ds ifjogu gsrq ftyk % floku] jkT; fcgkj esa bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkuh pkfg, A
vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slh ikbiykbu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, vko';d izrhr gksrk gS fd ml Hkwfe esa ftlds Hkhrj mDr
ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkus dk izLrko gS vkSj tks bl vf/lwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa o£.kr gS] mi;ksx dk vtZu fd;k tk,_
vr% vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbUl (Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/dkj dk vtZu) vf/fu;e] 1962 (1962
dk 50) dh /kjk 3 dh mi&/kjk (1) }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] mDr Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/dkj dk vtZu djus ds vius
vk'k; dh ?kks"k.kk djrh gS_
dksbZ O;fDr] tks mDr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa fgrc¼ gS] ml rkjh[k ls ftldks] Hkkjr ds jkti=k esa ;Fkk izdkf'kr bl
vfèklwpuk dh izfr;ka lk/kj.k turk dks miyC/ djk nh tkrh gSa] bDdhl fnu ds vUnj] Hkwfe ds Hkhrj ikbiykbu fcNk, tkus gsrq mi;ksx
ds vf/dkj ds vtZu ds fy,] Jh v:.k dqekj >k] fc-iz-ls- o l{ke izkf/dkjh bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM] (ikbiykbu fMohtu)
iVuk] iks-vks- <syok] flikjk] ftyk iVuk] fiu % 800020] fcgkj dks fyf[kr :i eas vk{ksi Hkst ldsxkA
vuqlwph
ftyk % floku
jkT; % fcgkj
ekStk@xzke
losZ@Cykd@la- (IyksV la-)
lc&fMo&la-
{ks=kiQy
gsDVs;j
vkjs
oxZ ehVj
1
2
3
4
5
6
ngdkbZ
401
00
03
53
Fkkuk uacj&231
402
00
00
20
400
00
06
01
397
00
01
84
398
00
07
06
395 ¼jkLrk½
00
03
57
399
00
00
20
394
00
17
63
393
00
02
32
391
00
04
03
389
00
01
25
390
00
02
79
386
00
09
02
385
00
04
68
384
00
04
57
363
00
03
24
362
00
02
89
339
00
10
18
340
00
08
24
341
00
06
84
341@407
00
01
88
261
00
01
38
262
00
03
73
4376
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4377
265
00
05
02
264
00
00
20
269
00
00
20
270
00
00
20
266
00
04
14
267
00
02
85
268
00
02
13
248
00
00
42
247
00
00
20
244
00
03
47
243
00
00
48
245
00
04
31
242
00
07
93
241
00
00
64
nkSu Nkijk
288
00
09
02
Fkkuk uacj&230
286
00
13
43
280
00
01
98
281
00
04
32
282
00
00
20
279
00
17
51
200 ¼jkLrk½
00
01
40
196
00
01
46
193
00
17
63
194
00
03
17
70
00
00
63
71
00
00
20
69
00
03
16
67
00
02
87
66
00
01
86
65
00
02
10
63
00
04
01
62
00
08
60
59
00
04
04
58
00
04
15
56
00
05
15
57
00
02
21
55
00
00
20
60
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4378
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
54
00
05
77
eaNk
855
00
01
21
Fkkuk uacj&225
857
00
05
58
854
00
01
90
853
00
03
36
858
00
00
68
859
00
00
20
851
00
00
20
852
00
02
20
848
00
04
55
849
00
02
42
847
00
00
41
846
00
02
40
844
00
02
86
843
00
00
20
845
00
03
72
842
00
03
69
Hknsvk
231
00
03
38
Fkkuk uacj&226
211
00
00
20
212
00
24
00
209
00
03
45
210
00
00
20
198
00
05
77
199
00
06
70
200
00
08
55
201
00
07
51
183
00
14
99
185
00
00
20
184
00
11
59
178
00
02
01
179
00
00
20
164
00
00
74
177
00
15
27
176
00
00
20
171
00
06
59
174
00
00
27
172
00
01
16
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4379
169
00
15
09
170
00
00
20
166
00
00
20
168
00
05
46
85
00
03
05
86
00
00
20
167
00
00
54
90
00
03
91
91
00
01
79
92
00
02
36
93
00
03
01
114
00
01
58
113
00
09
63
112
00
00
20
115
00
01
24
110
00
06
10
109
00
02
63
108
00
03
17
107
00
01
24
106
00
00
20
117
00
01
85
118
00
01
28
119
00
02
01
105
00
00
20
104
00
01
59
121
00
14
54
123
00
00
20
122
00
00
20
10
00
00
28
9
00
00
20
mLVh
540
00
07
54
Fkkuk uacj&224
541
00
01
55
542
00
00
20
539
00
06
43
538
00
02
86
536
00
12
37
465
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4380
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
531
00
00
48
466
00
11
36
467
00
04
99
460
00
00
46
459
00
03
29
468
00
00
20
400@1910
00
00
20
458
00
08
51
456
00
00
47
457
00
00
20
455
00
04
71
454 ¼jkLrk½
00
04
43
453
00
00
20
320
00
00
20
470
00
00
20
311¼jkLrk½
00
00
20
312¼jkLrk½
00
01
96
313
00
01
39
314¼jkLrk½
00
03
86
317
00
00
20
315
00
06
55
295@1931
00
00
20
310
00
00
20
316
00
00
40
291
00
00
20
290
00
02
33
289
00
05
48
288
00
06
61
287
00
04
47
284
00
00
20
286
00
04
61
190
00
00
20
191
00
00
29
192
00
00
61
193
00
01
43
194
00
06
60
195
00
03
68
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4381
196
00
03
52
199
00
00
20
198
00
02
82
197¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
04
40
200¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
04
14
201¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
00
42
202
00
00
20
89
00
00
20
88
00
02
06
84
00
04
62
83
00
06
53
78
00
01
74
76
00
00
20
82
00
02
55
81
00
03
40
79
00
07
32
74
00
01
54
72
00
00
20
80
00
11
54
egwvy
1005
00
00
20
Fkkuk uacj&202
1004
00
06
23
1003
00
06
82
1000
00
00
20
1001
00
00
20
999
00
16
81
992
00
05
93
973
00
08
12
974
00
00
38
975
00
09
02
977
00
00
20
986
00
01
93
981
00
10
71
984
00
00
20
983
00
00
39
982
00
04
99
947
00
06
71
946
00
11
21
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4382
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
945
00
04
08
940
00
02
06
941
00
00
20
865¼jkLrk½
00
01
42
857
00
00
20
858
00
05
89
859
00
06
15
860
00
00
35
861
00
00
20
815
00
02
78
816
00
00
20
814
00
07
32
813
00
07
20
819
00
00
38
823
00
06
10
806
00
00
20
822
00
02
28
805
00
01
90
824
00
01
99
804
00
02
08
801
00
03
87
800
00
03
80
799
00
08
60
798
00
00
97
797
00
00
20
752
00
01
42
793
00
14
50
792
00
01
91
790
00
13
20
787
00
07
13
788
00
01
38
783
00
05
49
784
00
00
20
782
00
00
58
499
00
04
40
780
00
01
19
779
00
00
81
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4383
500
00
06
84
778
00
00
20
501
00
02
30
777
00
00
62
503
00
05
96
510
00
02
80
504
00
00
74
506
00
01
27
505
00
00
20
507
00
03
31
508
00
00
36
509
00
00
20
543
00
05
19
546
00
05
55
545
00
01
01
547
00
06
64
548
00
04
38
497¼jkLrk½
00
01
69
483
00
00
00
556
00
00
20
480
00
00
20
479
00
01
38
478
00
01
73
477
00
06
26
475
00
03
30
474
00
02
87
463
00
04
19
452
00
02
12
451
00
01
24
450
00
01
07
449
00
00
65
448
00
00
20
453
00
00
83
454
00
02
17
447
00
03
94
446
00
00
24
442
00
00
51
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4384
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
441
00
00
96
433
00
00
70
434
00
02
90
432
00
04
14
408
00
00
77
407
00
00
20
409
00
03
13
403
00
08
75
402
00
00
20
400@2802
00
00
20
369
00
00
27
401
00
08
40
400
00
03
61
394
00
03
45
393
00
00
20
395
00
06
43
396
00
06
98
397
00
00
20
391
00
00
43
ehjkpd
361
00
01
41
Fkkuk uacj&199
362
00
00
20
367
00
00
20
360
00
02
97
359
00
01
31
358
00
00
71
356
00
03
09
354
00
03
18
355
00
00
20
353
00
06
23
348
00
10
16
210
00
00
20
211
00
00
20
209
00
00
54
207
00
01
20
208
00
05
68
214
00
05
10
206
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4385
ehjk pd Fkkuk uacj& 199
215
00
04
46
204
00
00
20
216
00
06
16
217
00
09
59
218
00
00
20
219
00
07
77
220
00
04
70
179¼jkLrk½
00
01
52
189
00
02
17
188
00
00
85
187
00
01
14
186
00
00
78
190
00
00
20
185
00
03
74
184
00
02
01
183
00
00
20
180
00
23
07
38
00
01
68
39
00
05
20
37
00
00
20
36
00
02
02
34
00
02
25
35
00
03
10
eanjk ikyh
1378
00
00
61
Fkkuk uacj&394
1377
00
22
37
1375
00
09
35
1376
00
13
79
1372
00
08
83
1371
00
04
61
1368
00
00
20
1367
00
05
20
1363
00
00
92
1361
00
03
48
1362
00
02
04
1360
00
02
58
1359
00
00
20
1154
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4386
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
enjk ikyh
1155
00
00
87
Fkkuk uacj&394
1156
00
03
83
1157
00
06
64
1160
00
00
27
1159
00
02
43
1158
00
00
39
1164
00
11
04
1165
00
07
33
1175
00
00
29
1175@1897
00
01
09
1174
00
03
60
1167
00
00
20
1173
00
07
06
1169
00
09
40
1137
00
00
36
1136
00
03
49
1024
00
07
24
1025¼jkLrk½
00
01
89
1028
00
13
33
1032
00
17
53
1034
00
05
51
1033
00
03
47
1036
00
02
20
1037
00
02
09
1040
00
00
90
1039
00
02
91
1045
00
08
50
1044
00
01
94
1043
00
01
20
1046¼jkLrk½
00
02
44
316
00
11
28
317
00
00
20
315
00
09
82
313
00
01
53
322
00
05
07
323
00
01
06
325
00
03
56
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4387
eanjk ikyh
327
00
11
86
Fkkuh uacj&394
328
00
09
70
334
00
00
87
335
00
06
39
337¼jkLrk½
00
01
97
393¼jkLrk½
00
00
20
383
00
09
78
366
00
08
78
382
00
03
09
367
00
10
24
368
00
02
93
369
00
05
11
362
00
06
86
361
00
07
41
357
00
00
20
355
00
11
94
354
00
16
27
349
00
03
16
348
00
02
07
347
00
07
15
346
00
18
27
345
00
03
33
72
00
02
86
71
00
03
80
70
00
02
53
69
00
01
21
68
00
00
78
67
00
00
64
66
00
00
20
64
00
00
20
73
00
13
01
49
00
13
47
50
00
06
10
51
00
03
11
48
00
31
26
41
00
01
83
eanjkmyh
1985
00
00
20
Fkkuk uacj&394
1984
00
09
27
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4388
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1983
00
06
96
1973
00
03
07
1972
00
00
20
1974
00
09
56
1975
00
03
04
1942
00
14
99
1971
00
00
20
1934
00
06
60
1943
00
00
20
1935
00
03
23
1933
00
01
91
1932
00
13
75
1896
00
07
63
1923
00
00
20
1921
00
00
20
1898
00
00
20
1922
00
00
35
1897
00
03
20
1887
00
06
47
1885
00
02
53
1886
00
08
27
1862
00
00
20
1884
00
01
98
1883
00
00
85
1881
00
00
20
1882
00
01
24
1863
00
02
48
1867
00
02
54
1868
00
00
20
1864
00
05
26
1866¼jkLrk½
00
03
30
946
00
11
07
936
00
00
20
932
00
00
20
937
00
05
10
931
00
05
95
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4389
eanjkM+yh
422¼jkLrk½
00
04
15
Fkkuk uacj&393
350
00
20
39
380
00
00
20
381
00
04
90
382
00
06
40
394
00
08
52
393
00
01
41
392
00
00
20
391¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
01
66
53
00
03
28
402
00
01
96
408
00
00
31
409
00
00
20
412¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
09
70
52
00
08
23
51
00
05
32
50
00
08
63
49
00
09
28
48
00
03
39
47
00
00
26
44
00
00
20
ygsth
2571
00
01
75
Fkkuk uacj&392
2572
00
00
20
2570
00
04
55
2573
00
03
45
2574
00
00
20
2569
00
11
64
2568
00
05
92
2567
00
04
90
2541
00
02
04
2542
00
13
34
2537¼ukyk½
00
01
87
2531
00
07
22
2530
00
00
20
2526
00
14
77
2529
00
11
48
2453
00
07
51
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4390
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2552
00
01
40
2450
00
01
92
2449
00
02
18
2448
00
05
32
2447
00
01
49
2454
00
11
99
2446
00
00
20
2445
00
00
20
2444
00
06
39
2443
00
00
20
2455
00
00
20
iwjSuk
807
00
00
20
Fkkuk uacj&383
802
00
04
62
804
00
09
38
803
00
03
05
801
00
04
09
773 ¼Mªsbu½
00
01
44
688
00
00
36
689
00
13
22
692
00
01
28
691
00
00
20
696¼jkLrk½
00
02
33
679
00
02
50
678
00
04
65
677
00
01
14
667
00
02
99
668
00
18
27
660
00
00
20
645
00
11
88
648
00
09
23
647
00
00
20
644
00
06
51
642
00
02
72
639
00
00
20
640
00
00
20
641
00
01
21
643
00
04
37
578
00
05
96
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4391
590
00
00
76
592
00
00
20
591
00
00
68
513
00
00
20
580
00
00
40
579
00
11
78
512
00
09
72
511
00
00
20
510
00
11
11
581
00
00
20
508
00
07
41
509
00
03
52
505
00
04
60
506
00
00
67
490
00
04
35
501
00
00
20
502
00
04
23
504
00
00
96
503
00
01
35
522 ¼ukyk½
00
00
84
ijkjh
767 ¼ukyk½
00
01
23
Fkkuk uacj&384
769
00
00
52
770
00
11
27
331
00
12
33
340
00
00
20
339
00
09
06
338
00
16
46
337
00
12
01
352
00
03
00
315
00
10
14
369
00
00
75
368
00
03
04
314
00
00
20
313
00
00
20
367
00
00
64
366
00
00
20
370
00
01
79
371
00
01
47
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4392
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
372
00
09
67
373
00
00
20
413
00
01
22
412
00
00
20
375
00
06
63
376
00
02
66
411
00
08
45
410
00
05
52
409
00
01
82
384
00
01
27
408
00
01
19
407
00
00
36
385
00
01
81
386
00
00
20
391
00
02
55
389
00
00
62
390
00
00
88
392
00
02
04
406
00
01
70
393
00
02
31
396
00
01
91
395
00
00
65
394
00
00
20
397
00
15
83
194@808
00
00
20
162
00
00
20
161
00
06
45
399
00
00
20
160
00
00
91
159
00
07
96
158
00
04
23
448
00
04
85
113
00
18
48
104
00
01
09
108
00
00
37
105
00
05
50
98@780
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4393
106
00
01
76
107
00
00
20
98@779
00
10
24
101
00
00
20
102
00
00
20
98@778
00
01
28
98
00
00
36
99
00
09
36
100
00
05
94
89
00
02
66
72
00
06
71
69
00
00
74
71
00
05
63
70
00
10
98
46
00
09
54
45
00
00
20
43
00
06
48
44
00
05
39
41
00
00
64
29
00
00
20
30
00
11
06
rsydkBq
3752
00
03
33
Fkkuk uacj&390
1199¼jkLrk½
00
01
31
1132
00
05
04
1131
00
14
83
1138
00
02
18
1137
00
11
07
1136
00
00
20
1141
00
02
24
1125
00
00
20
1142
00
09
92
1123
00
23
99
866
00
06
93
867
00
00
20
1119
00
07
73
876
00
16
06
882
00
02
02
881
00
05
61
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4394
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
876
00
00
45
883
00
00
20
880
00
06
70
895
00
01
13
879
00
02
69
892
00
02
59
893
00
14
01
894
00
01
14
896
00
04
28
897
00
01
65
898
00
00
20
943
00
00
20
900
00
01
61
901
00
00
20
904
00
03
92
899
00
02
48
905
00
01
08
903
00
03
00
906
00
01
14
932
00
05
76
930
00
00
20
931
00
05
49
933
00
00
20
926
00
00
77
934
00
02
00
925
00
07
03
924
00
00
96
920
00
02
13
921
00
04
26
922
00
03
23
923
00
00
76
592
00
00
20
598
00
07
10
597
00
01
86
595
00
02
23
594
00
00
20
480¼jkLrk½
00
02
94
785¼jkLrk½
00
00
20
600
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4395
601
00
00
20
602
00
05
29
614
00
08
83
611
00
00
20
626
00
01
39
625
00
00
20
612
00
00
20
613
00
00
67
610
00
00
20
628
00
01
54
627
00
01
48
623
00
02
20
633
00
03
90
622
00
00
20
632
00
01
92
629
00
00
20
630
00
00
20
631
00
00
20
634
00
01
83
635
00
01
11
636
00
04
17
642
00
00
20
473
00
00
20
639
00
00
20
637
00
01
96
638
00
00
20
640
00
00
20
472
00
08
97
460
00
00
20
471
00
01
20
470
00
13
54
465
00
01
40
469
00
10
53
468
00
04
53
431
00
02
18
430
00
00
97
jQhiwj
1135
00
02
68
Fkkuk uacj&386
1134
00
07
75
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4396
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1133
00
00
25
1127
00
05
01
1128
00
00
20
1126
00
04
36
1111
00
00
20
1125
00
07
08
1113
00
00
20
1124
00
01
28
1122
00
03
33
1123
00
00
51
1121
00
00
20
1120
00
04
91
1119
00
04
02
470
00
00
20
1091
00
01
83
471
00
03
02
472
00
02
51
473
00
01
85
474
00
00
20
481
00
03
17
480
00
07
22
484
00
00
20
479
00
00
20
485
00
01
24
486
00
01
11
491
00
04
60
492
00
01
97
493
00
00
20
490
00
03
47
489
00
02
42
550
00
00
20
488
00
00
20
494
00
01
12
495
00
04
87
496
00
02
34
497
00
03
76
506
00
02
99
507
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4397
498
00
00
20
505
00
08
85
509
00
00
20
504
00
00
29
510
00
05
89
512
00
01
64
513
00
03
50
514
00
01
45
515
00
00
20
511
00
03
56
516
00
03
91
517
00
00
20
519
00
06
32
520
00
04
92
522
00
04
83
585¼jkLrk½
00
04
48
523
00
03
56
171
00
00
46
170
00
00
20
169
00
05
56
112
00
06
03
111
00
00
20
113
00
15
99
114
00
00
20
96
00
01
33
95
00
00
80
94
00
00
20
76
00
11
01
75
00
00
20
77
00
08
70
78
00
00
20
74
00
13
08
72
00
02
71
73
00
07
79
57
00
02
93
68
00
01
35
58
00
08
27
61
00
07
33
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4398
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
62
00
00
20
59
00
03
32
60
00
02
56
5
00
10
71
4
00
02
42
¹iQk- la- vkj&25011@15@2013&vksvkj&Iº
iou oqQekj] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 5th August, 2013
S.O. 1626.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest
that a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited in Dist. Siwan in the State of Bihar for ‘Patna
to Motihari and Baitalpur Pipeline’ for the transportation of Petroleum Product;
And, whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary
to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which is described
in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals
Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares
its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on
which the copies of the notification issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the
Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user
therein for laying of the pipeline under the land, to Shri Arun Kumar Jha B.A.S. & Competent Authority, Indian Oil
Corporation Limited. (Pipelines Division), P.O. : Dhelwan, Sipara, Dist. Patna, (Bihar.) Pin-800020.
Encl. : Schedule
SCHEDULE
Dist. : Siwan
State : Bihar
Mouja / Village
Survey/BlockNo.
Sub-Div-No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
DAHKAI
401
00
03
53
Thana No. 231
402
00
00
20
400
00
06
01
397
00
01
84
398
00
07
06
395-Road
00
03
57
399
00
00
20
394
00
17
63
393
00
02
32
391
00
04
03
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4399
389
00
01
25
390
00
02
79
386
00
09
02
385
00
04
68
384
00
04
57
363
00
03
24
362
00
02
89
339
00
10
18
340
00
08
24
341
00
06
84
341/407
00
01
88
261
00
01
38
262
00
03
73
265
00
05
02
264
00
00
20
269
00
00
20
270
00
00
20
266
00
04
14
267
00
02
85
268
00
02
13
248
00
00
42
247
00
00
20
244
00
03
47
243
00
00
48
245
00
04
31
242
00
07
93
241
00
00
64
DAUN CHHAPRA
288
00
09
02
Thana No. 230
286
00
13
43
280
00
01
98
281
00
04
32
282
00
00
20
279
00
17
51
200-Road
00
01
40
196
00
01
46
193
00
17
63
194
00
03
17
70
00
00
63
71
00
00
20
69
00
03
16
67
00
02
87
66
00
01
86
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4400
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
65
00
02
10
63
00
04
01
62
00
08
60
59
00
04
04
58
00
04
15
56
00
05
15
57
00
02
21
55
00
00
20
60
00
00
20
54
00
05
77
MANCHHA
855
00
01
21
Thana No. 225
857
00
05
58
854
00
01
90
853
00
03
36
858
00
00
68
859
00
00
20
851
00
00
20
852
00
02
20
848
00
04
55
849
00
02
42
847
00
00
41
846
00
02
40
844
00
02
86
843
00
00
20
845
00
03
72
842
00
03
69
BHADEA
231
00
03
38
Thana No. 226
211
00
00
20
212
00
24
00
209
00
03
45
210
00
00
20
198
00
05
77
199
00
06
70
200
00
08
55
201
00
07
51
183
00
14
99
185
00
00
20
184
00
11
59
178
00
02
01
179
00
00
20
164
00
00
74
177
00
15
27
176
00
00
20
171
00
06
59
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4401
174
00
00
27
172
00
01
16
169
00
15
09
170
00
00
20
166
00
00
20
168
00
05
46
85
00
03
05
86
00
00
20
167
00
00
54
90
00
03
91
91
00
01
79
92
00
02
36
93
00
03
01
114
00
01
58
113
00
09
63
112
00
00
20
115
00
01
24
110
00
06
10
109
00
02
63
108
00
03
17
107
00
01
24
106
00
00
20
117
00
01
85
118
00
01
28
119
00
02
01
105
00
00
20
104
00
01
59
121
00
14
54
123
00
00
20
122
00
00
20
10
00
00
28
9
00
00
20
USTI
540
00
07
54
Thana No. 224
541
00
01
55
542
00
00
20
539
00
06
43
538
00
02
86
536
00
12
37
465
00
00
20
531
00
00
48
466
00
11
36
467
00
04
99
460
00
00
46
459
00
03
29
468
00
00
20
400/1910
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4402
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
458
00
08
51
456
00
00
47
457
00
00
20
455
00
04
71
454-Road
00
04
43
453
00
00
20
320
00
00
20
470
00
00
20
311-Road
00
00
20
312-Road
00
01
96
313
00
01
39
314-Road
00
03
86
317
00
00
20
315
00
06
55
295/1931
00
00
20
310
00
00
20
316
00
00
40
291
00
00
20
290
00
02
33
289
00
05
48
288
00
06
61
287
00
04
47
284
00
00
20
286
00
04
61
190
00
00
20
191
00
00
29
192
00
00
61
193
00
01
43
194
00
06
60
195
00
03
68
196
00
03
52
199
00
00
20
198
00
02
82
197-Cart Track
00
04
40
200-Cart Track
00
04
14
201-Cart Track
00
00
42
202
00
00
20
89
00
00
20
88
00
02
06
84
00
04
62
83
00
06
53
78
00
01
74
76
00
00
20
82
00
02
55
81
00
03
40
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4403
79
00
07
32
74
00
01
54
72
00
00
20
80
00
11
54
MAHUAL
1005
00
00
20
Thana No. 202
1004
00
06
23
1003
00
06
82
1000
00
00
20
1001
00
00
20
999
00
16
81
992
00
05
93
973
00
08
12
974
00
00
38
975
00
09
02
977
00
00
20
986
00
01
93
981
00
10
71
984
00
00
20
983
00
00
39
982
00
04
99
947
00
06
71
946
00
11
21
945
00
04
08
940
00
02
06
941
00
00
20
865(ROAD)
00
01
42
857
00
00
20
858
00
05
89
859
00
06
15
860
00
00
35
861
00
00
20
815
00
02
78
816
00
00
20
814
00
07
32
813
00
07
20
819
00
00
38
823
00
06
10
806
00
00
20
822
00
02
28
805
00
01
90
824
00
01
99
804
00
02
08
801
00
03
87
800
00
03
80
799
00
08
60
798
00
00
97
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4404
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
MAHUAL
797
00
00
20
Thana No. 202
752
00
01
42
793
00
14
50
792
00
01
91
790
00
13
20
787
00
07
13
788
00
01
38
783
00
05
49
784
00
00
20
782
00
00
58
499
00
04
40
780
00
01
19
779
00
00
81
500
00
06
84
778
00
00
20
501
00
02
30
777
00
00
62
503
00
05
96
510
00
02
80
504
00
00
74
506
00
01
27
505
00
00
20
507
00
03
31
508
00
00
36
509
00
00
20
543
00
05
19
546
00
05
55
545
00
01
01
547
00
06
64
548
00
04
38
497(ROAD)
00
01
69
483
00
00
00
556
00
00
20
480
00
00
20
479
00
01
38
478
00
01
73
477
00
06
26
475
00
03
30
474
00
02
87
463
00
04
19
452
00
02
12
451
00
01
24
450
00
01
07
449
00
00
65
448
00
00
20
453
00
00
83
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4405
MAHUAL
454
00
02
17
Thana No. 202
447
00
03
94
446
00
00
24
442
00
00
51
441
00
00
96
433
00
00
70
434
00
02
90
432
00
04
14
408
00
00
77
407
00
00
20
409
00
03
13
403
00
08
75
402
00
00
20
400/2802
00
00
20
369
00
00
27
401
00
08
40
400
00
03
61
394
00
03
45
393
00
00
20
395
00
06
43
396
00
06
98
397
00
00
20
391
00
00
43
MIRACHAK
361
00
01
41
Thana No. 199
362
00
00
20
367
00
00
20
360
00
02
97
359
00
01
31
358
00
00
71
356
00
03
09
354
00
03
18
355
00
00
20
353
00
06
23
348
00
10
16
210
00
00
20
211
00
00
20
209
00
00
54
207
00
01
20
208
00
05
68
214
00
05
10
206
00
00
20
215
00
04
46
204
00
00
20
216
00
06
16
217
00
09
59
218
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4406
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
219
00
07
77
220
00
04
70
179(ROAD)
00
01
52
189
00
02
17
188
00
00
85
187
00
01
14
186
00
00
78
190
00
00
20
185
00
03
74
184
00
02
01
183
00
00
20
180
00
23
07
38
00
01
68
39
00
05
20
37
00
00
20
36
00
02
02
34
00
02
25
35
00
03
10
MANDRA PALI
1378
00
00
61
Thana No. 394
1377
00
22
37
1375
00
09
35
1376
00
13
79
1372
00
08
83
1371
00
04
61
1368
00
00
20
1367
00
05
20
1363
00
00
92
1361
00
03
48
1362
00
02
04
1360
00
02
58
1359
00
00
20
1154
00
00
20
1155
00
00
87
1156
00
03
83
1157
00
06
64
1160
00
00
27
1159
00
02
43
1158
00
00
39
1164
00
11
04
1165
00
07
33
1175
00
00
29
1175/1897
00
01
09
1174
00
03
60
1167
00
00
20
1173
00
07
06
1169
00
09
40
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4407
MANDRA PALI
1137
00
00
36
Thana No. 394
1136
00
03
49
1024
00
07
24
1025(ROAD)
00
01
89
1028
00
13
33
1032
00
17
53
1034
00
05
51
1033
00
03
47
1036
00
02
20
1037
00
02
09
1040
00
00
90
1039
00
02
91
1045
00
08
50
1044
00
01
94
1043
00
01
20
1046(ROAD)
00
02
44
316
00
11
28
317
00
00
20
315
00
09
82
313
00
01
53
322
00
05
07
323
00
01
06
325
00
03
56
327
00
11
86
328
00
09
70
334
00
00
87
335
00
06
39
337(ROAD)
00
01
97
393(ROAD)
00
00
20
383
00
09
78
366
00
08
78
382
00
03
09
367
00
10
24
368
00
02
93
369
00
05
11
362
00
06
86
361
00
07
41
357
00
00
20
355
00
11
94
354
00
16
27
349
00
03
16
348
00
02
07
347
00
07
15
346
00
18
27
345
00
03
33
72
00
02
86
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4408
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
71
00
03
80
70
00
02
53
69
00
01
21
68
00
00
78
67
00
00
64
66
00
00
20
64
00
00
20
73
00
13
01
49
00
13
47
50
00
06
10
51
00
03
11
48
00
31
26
41
00
01
83
MANDARAULI
1985
00
00
20
Thana No. 393
1984
00
09
27
1983
00
06
96
1973
00
03
07
1972
00
00
20
1974
00
09
56
1975
00
03
04
1942
00
14
99
1971
00
00
20
1934
00
06
60
1943
00
00
20
1935
00
03
23
1933
00
01
91
1932
00
13
75
1896
00
07
63
1923
00
00
20
1921
00
00
20
1898
00
00
20
1922
00
00
35
1897
00
03
20
1887
00
06
47
1885
00
02
53
1886
00
08
27
1862
00
00
20
1884
00
01
98
1883
00
00
85
1881
00
00
20
1882
00
01
24
1863
00
02
48
1867
00
02
54
1868
00
00
20
1864
00
05
26
1866(ROAD)
00
03
30
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4409
946
00
11
07
936
00
00
20
932
00
00
20
937
00
05
10
931
00
05
95
422(ROAD)
00
04
15
350
00
20
39
380
00
00
20
381
00
04
90
382
00
06
40
394
00
08
52
393
00
01
41
392
00
00
20
391(CART TRACK)
00
01
66
53
00
03
28
402
00
01
96
408
00
00
31
409
00
00
20
412(CART TRACK)
00
09
70
52
00
08
23
51
00
05
32
50
00
08
63
49
00
09
28
48
00
03
39
47
00
00
26
44
00
00
20
LAHEJI
2571
00
01
75
Thana No. 392
2572
00
00
20
2570
00
04
55
2573
00
03
45
2574
00
00
20
2569
00
11
64
2568
00
05
92
2567
00
04
90
2541
00
02
04
2542
00
13
34
2537(NALA)
00
01
87
2531
00
07
22
2530
00
00
20
2526
00
14
77
2529
00
11
48
2453
00
07
51
2552
00
01
40
2450
00
01
92
2449
00
02
18
2448
00
05
32
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4410
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2447
00
01
49
2454
00
11
99
2446
00
00
20
2445
00
00
20
2444
00
06
39
2443
00
00
20
2455
00
00
20
PURAINA
807
00
00
20
Thana No. 383
802
00
04
62
804
00
09
38
803
00
03
05
801
00
04
09
773(Drain)
00
01
44
688
00
00
36
689
00
13
22
692
00
01
28
691
00
00
20
696(ROAD)
00
02
33
679
00
02
50
678
00
04
65
677
00
01
14
667
00
02
99
668
00
18
27
660
00
00
20
645
00
11
88
648
00
09
23
647
00
00
20
644
00
06
51
642
00
02
72
639
00
00
20
640
00
00
20
641
00
01
21
643
00
04
37
578
00
05
96
590
00
00
76
592
00
00
20
591
00
00
68
513
00
00
20
580
00
00
40
579
00
11
78
512
00
09
72
511
00
00
20
510
00
11
11
581
00
00
20
508
00
07
41
509
00
03
52
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4411
505
00
04
60
506
00
00
67
490
00
04
35
501
00
00
20
502
00
04
23
504
00
00
96
503
00
01
35
522(NALA)
00
00
84
PARARI
767(NALA)
00
01
23
Thana No. 384
769
00
00
52
770
00
11
27
331
00
12
33
340
00
00
20
339
00
09
06
338
00
16
46
337
00
12
01
352
00
03
00
315
00
10
14
369
00
00
75
368
00
03
04
314
00
00
20
313
00
00
20
367
00
00
64
366
00
00
20
370
00
01
79
371
00
01
47
372
00
09
67
373
00
00
20
413
00
01
22
412
00
00
20
375
00
06
63
376
00
02
66
411
00
08
45
410
00
05
52
409
00
01
82
384
00
01
27
408
00
01
19
407
00
00
36
385
00
01
81
386
00
00
20
391
00
02
55
389
00
00
62
390
00
00
88
392
00
02
04
406
00
01
70
393
00
02
31
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4412
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
PARARI
396
00
01
91
Thana No. 384
395
00
00
65
394
00
00
20
397
00
15
83
194/808
00
00
20
162
00
00
20
161
00
06
45
399
00
00
20
160
00
00
91
159
00
07
96
158
00
04
23
448
00
04
85
113
00
18
48
104
00
01
09
108
00
00
37
105
00
05
50
98/780
00
00
20
106
00
01
76
107
00
00
20
98/779
00
10
24
101
00
00
20
102
00
00
20
98/778
00
01
28
98
00
00
36
99
00
09
36
100
00
05
94
89
00
02
66
72
00
06
71
69
00
00
74
71
00
05
63
70
00
10
98
46
00
09
54
45
00
00
20
43
00
06
48
44
00
05
39
41
00
00
64
29
00
00
20
30
00
11
06
TELKATHU
3752
00
03
33
Thana No. 390
1199(ROAD)
00
01
31
1132
00
05
04
1131
00
14
83
1138
00
02
18
1137
00
11
07
1136
00
00
20
1141
00
02
24
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4413
TELKATHU
1125
00
00
20
Thana No. 390
1142
00
09
92
1123
00
23
99
866
00
06
93
867
00
00
20
1119
00
07
73
876
00
16
06
882
00
02
02
881
00
05
61
876
00
00
45
883
00
00
20
880
00
06
70
895
00
01
13
879
00
02
69
892
00
02
59
893
00
14
01
894
00
01
14
896
00
04
28
897
00
01
65
898
00
00
20
943
00
00
20
900
00
01
61
901
00
00
20
904
00
03
92
899
00
02
48
905
00
01
08
903
00
03
00
906
00
01
14
932
00
05
76
930
00
00
20
931
00
05
49
933
00
00
20
926
00
00
77
934
00
02
00
925
00
07
03
924
00
00
96
920
00
02
13
921
00
04
26
922
00
03
23
923
00
00
76
592
00
00
20
598
00
07
10
597
00
01
86
595
00
02
23
594
00
00
20
480(ROAD)
00
02
94
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4414
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
TELKATHU
785(ROAD)
00
00
20
Thana No. 390
600
00
00
20
601
00
00
20
602
00
05
29
614
00
08
83
611
00
00
20
626
00
01
39
625
00
00
20
612
00
00
20
613
00
00
67
610
00
00
20
628
00
01
54
627
00
01
48
623
00
02
20
633
00
03
90
622
00
00
20
632
00
01
92
629
00
00
20
630
00
00
20
631
00
00
20
634
00
01
83
635
00
01
11
636
00
04
17
642
00
00
20
473
00
00
20
639
00
00
20
637
00
01
96
638
00
00
20
640
00
00
20
472
00
08
97
460
00
00
20
471
00
01
20
470
00
13
54
465
00
01
40
469
00
10
53
468
00
04
53
431
00
02
18
430
00
00
97
RAFIPUR
1135
00
02
68
Thana No. 386
1134
00
07
75
1133
00
00
25
1127
00
05
01
1128
00
00
20
1126
00
04
36
1111
00
00
20
1125
00
07
08
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4415
RAFIPUR
1113
00
00
20
Thana No. 386
1124
00
01
28
1122
00
03
33
1123
00
00
51
1121
00
00
20
1120
00
04
91
1119
00
04
02
470
00
00
20
1091
00
01
83
471
00
03
02
472
00
02
51
473
00
01
85
474
00
00
20
481
00
03
17
480
00
07
22
484
00
00
20
479
00
00
20
485
00
01
24
486
00
01
11
491
00
04
60
492
00
01
97
493
00
00
20
490
00
03
47
489
00
02
42
550
00
00
20
488
00
00
20
494
00
01
12
495
00
04
87
496
00
02
34
497
00
03
76
506
00
02
99
507
00
00
20
498
00
00
20
505
00
08
85
509
00
00
20
504
00
00
29
510
00
05
89
512
00
01
64
513
00
03
50
514
00
01
45
515
00
00
20
511
00
03
56
516
00
03
91
517
00
00
20
519
00
06
32
520
00
04
92
RAFIPUR
522
00
04
83
Thana No. 386
585 (ROAD)
00
04
48
523
00
03
56
171
00
00
46
170
00
00
20
169
00
05
56
112
00
06
03
111
00
00
20
113
00
15
99
114
00
00
20
96
00
01
33
95
00
00
80
94
00
00
20
76
00
11
01
75
00
00
20
77
00
08
70
78
00
00
20
74
00
13
08
72
00
02
71
73
00
07
79
57
00
02
93
68
00
01
35
58
00
08
27
61
00
07
33
62
00
00
20
59
00
03
32
60
00
02
56
5
00
10
71
4
00
02
42
[F. No. R-25011/15/2013-OR-I]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
4416
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
ubZ fnYyh] 5 vxLr] 2013
dk-vk- 1627-—dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slk izrhr gksrk gS fd yksd fgr esa ;g vko”;d gS fd iVuk ls eksfrgkjh vkSj csrkyiqj
rd isVªksfy;e inkFkksZ ds ifjogu gsrq ftyk floku] jkT; fcgkj esa bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs”ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkuh
pkfg, A
vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slh ikbiykbu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, vko”;d izrhr gksrk gS fd ml Hkwfe esa ftlds Hkhrj
mDr ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkus dk izLrko gS vkSj tks bl vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa of.kZr gS] mi;ksx dk vtZu fd;k tk,(
vr% vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] iSVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbUl ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½ vf/kfu;e] 1962 ¼1962
dk 50½ dh /kkjk 3 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk iznÙk “kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] mDr Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/akdkj dk vtZu djus ds vius
vk”k; dh ?kks’k.kk djrh gS(
dksbZ O;fDr] tks mDr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa fgrc) gS] ml rkjh[k ls ftldks] Hkkjr ds jkti= esa ;Fkk izdkf”kr bl
vfèklwpuk dh izfr;ka lk/kkj.k turk dks miyC/k djk nh tkrh gS] bDdhl fnu ds vUnj] Hkwfe ds Hkhrj ikbiykbu fcNk, tkus gsrq
mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj ds vtZu ds fy,] Jh v:.k dqekj >k] fc-iz-ls- o l{ke izkf/kdkjh bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs”ku fyfeVsM] ¼ikbiykbu
fMohtu½ iVuk] iks-vks- <syok] flikjk] ftyk iVuk] fiu% 800020] fcgkj dks fyf[kr :i eas vk{ksi Hkst ldsxkA
vuqlwph
rglhy % floku
jkT; % fcgkj
ekStk@xzke
losZ@Cykd@la- (IyksV la-)
lc&Mho&la-
{ks=kiQy
gsDVs;j
vkjs
oxZ ehVj
1
2
3
4
5
6
edqaniwj
469
00
00
27
Fkkuk uacj&157
470
00
00
20
468
00
00
91
467
00
01
28
466
00
01
75
462
00
03
93
463
00
00
20
461
00
02
39
460
00
02
46
457
00
00
20
459
00
00
79
458
00
04
78
454
00
00
20
450 ¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
09
50
36
00
05
38
37
00
00
29
35
00
21
10
40
00
01
40
34
00
09
45
41
00
00
20
33
00
02
08
32
00
00
40
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4417
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4418
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
52
00
02
92
82
00
03
83
31
00
00
20
30
00
06
18
23
00
08
12
25
00
00
20
24
00
03
63
22
00
05
61
27
00
00
20
21
00
03
72
16
00
00
20
28
00
00
20
20
00
01
68
18
00
01
91
17
00
00
20
19
00
03
01
9
00
03
31
8
00
00
20
Hkyqvk eqdqan
405
00
00
20
Fkkuk uacj&158
404
00
00
20
403
00
00
20
266
00
00
20
81
00
09
69
85
00
00
20
82
00
01
90
83
00
00
20
84
00
00
20
80
00
01
36
78
00
02
78
77@454
00
04
03
76
00
14
85
75
00
00
20
74
00
04
24
73@455
00
02
74
72
00
06
97
70
00
02
71
71
00
03
61
69
00
03
86
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4419
68
00
00
20
63
00
00
34
62
00
00
20
uan ikyh
324
00
00
20
Fkkuk uacj&159
319
00
02
62
318
00
05
63
317
00
00
20
297
00
15
67
298
00
02
44
296
00
19
17
267
00
02
15
268
00
06
53
598
00
09
56
261
00
02
32
265
00
16
79
262
00
04
25
263
00
01
78
264
00
08
34
thjksnsbZ
1990
00
03
98
Fkkuk uacj&152
1988
00
01
52
1991
00
00
20
lwjoky
1625 ¼jkLrk½
00
00
20
Fkkuk uacj&139
2285¼jkLrk½
00
01
24
2287¼jkLrk½
00
02
18
2261
00
02
53
2257
00
05
02
2260
00
07
57
2259
00
00
62
2251
00
16
04
2250
00
18
31
2241
00
11
97
2242
00
00
20
2223
00
36
98
2163
00
16
81
2162
00
00
20
2161
00
00
39
2164
00
13
58
2165
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4420
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2160
00
02
23
2159
00
00
20
2157
00
04
45
2166
00
11
17
2156
00
04
37
2167
00
02
53
2168
00
13
51
2154
00
00
49
2153
00
00
43
2169
00
06
61
2152
00
00
90
2170
00
05
89
2171
00
04
84
2172
00
02
79
2151
00
01
19
2150
00
01
37
2173
00
03
04
2149
00
01
43
2174
00
02
59
2148
00
04
63
2175
00
02
34
2146¼jkLrk½
00
01
70
2143
00
08
02
2142
00
10
03
2125
00
18
00
2124
00
09
09
2123
00
00
20
2117
00
00
20
2116
00
04
31
2115
00
04
79
2114
00
18
53
2030
00
00
20
2031
00
00
20
2032
00
00
20
2033
00
00
20
2113
00
00
20
2069
00
08
97
2070
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4421
2068
00
00
20
2067
00
00
20
2066
00
00
20
748
00
10
05
781
00
00
20
774
00
02
95
775
00
00
20
773
00
07
76
769
00
01
72
772
00
00
20
771
00
00
20
770
00
00
20
767
00
02
31
763
00
07
58
765
00
12
56
764
00
00
20
659 ¼jkLrk½
00
01
43
652
00
01
32
653
00
05
88
651
00
00
20
656
00
01
58
655
00
01
72
654
00
04
38
657
00
00
20
629
00
01
68
628
00
02
41
626
00
11
24
627
00
00
20
630
00
00
20
625
00
00
20
624
00
00
20
384
00
03
76
385
00
07
62
374
00
00
20
386 ¼jkLrk½
00
00
20
397
00
03
97
398
00
04
90
399
00
02
67
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4422
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
402
00
02
37
403
00
02
42
408
00
02
46
409
00
00
20
410
00
02
58
413
00
03
43
415
00
02
13
420
00
00
20
421
00
06
60
422
00
02
95
439
00
02
70
423
00
04
33
438
00
02
93
437
00
00
76
428
00
00
20
436
00
09
02
434
00
09
67
435
00
00
20
432
00
05
60
433
00
11
08
462
00
00
20
464
00
03
88
483
00
00
20
484
00
05
86
485
00
03
78
486
00
00
20
463
00
00
31
492
00
01
27
488
00
03
10
491
00
02
20
494
00
00
20
490
00
02
49
489
00
01
71
495
00
02
02
477
00
01
37
476
00
00
42
475
00
00
20
496
00
05
54
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4423
497
00
00
85
500 ¼jkLrk½
00
01
53
46
00
08
43
63
00
00
20
64
00
12
45
45
00
09
85
43
00
00
20
42
00
00
20
44
00
02
44
eqbZu
2913
00
05
31
Fkkuk uacj&137
2924
00
00
20
2912
00
02
94
2914
00
02
65
2915
00
06
03
2916
00
03
45
2917
00
06
75
2918
00
04
61
2919
00
03
83
2920
00
07
44
2909
00
00
20
2857
00
09
33
2904
00
09
06
2903
00
00
97
2901
00
00
20
2902
00
02
74
2863
00
00
20
2864
00
00
20
2869
00
07
36
2868
00
07
17
2867
00
11
58
2871
00
00
20
2653
00
01
02
2652
00
16
11
2676
00
00
20
2677
00
00
20
2678
00
03
12
2679
00
05
24
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4424
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2680
00
04
26
2651
00
00
20
2650
00
01
27
2681
00
10
72
2698
00
00
20
2697
00
00
20
2682
00
01
48
2683
00
00
50
2684
00
11
06
2686
00
05
42
2687
00
00
20
2691
00
00
20
2688
00
03
92
2638
00
00
20
2637
00
10
60
2689
00
00
20
2690
00
00
20
2634
00
00
20
2632
00
00
20
2636
00
02
86
2635
00
05
37
2628
00
02
84
2629
00
06
61
2630
00
00
88
2627
00
01
24
2624
00
14
18
2625
00
22
89
1499
00
02
96
1500
00
00
60
1509
00
05
82
1498
00
00
20
1510
00
00
20
1511
00
00
20
1508
00
10
19
1507
00
00
20
1505
00
00
20
2021¼ukyk½
00
01
81
1512
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4425
2023
00
14
25
2022
00
02
83
2024
00
01
47
2020
00
04
14
2018
00
16
31
2019
00
00
20
2017
00
00
41
2011
00
08
67
2012
00
00
20
2006
00
06
15
2007¼ukyk½
00
01
62
1863
00
00
20
1881
00
00
20
1882
00
04
46
1883
00
06
59
1885
00
00
54
1884
00
03
72
1886
00
00
46
1887
00
00
20
1880
00
09
96
1878
00
06
97
1877
00
00
20
1879
00
00
20
1872
00
10
55
1873
00
06
05
1828
00
07
69
1827
00
00
20
1829
00
02
61
1830
00
02
60
1750 ¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
00
20
1826
00
03
66
1825
00
01
14
1823
00
00
20
1822
00
00
20
1821
00
00
20
1820
00
00
20
1824
00
04
38
1751
00
12
05
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4426
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1755
00
13
79
1760
00
01
35
1759
00
09
60
1756
00
00
20
1762
00
00
20
1758
00
06
80
1763
00
08
72
1757¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
00
20
75
00
00
20
74
00
00
20
72
00
00
20
1766
00
06
28
73
00
04
28
1767
00
02
68
1768
00
00
20
1770
00
09
85
1771
00
08
33
22
00
00
42
18
00
01
33
1772
00
09
72
19
00
00
20
17
00
06
95
1773
00
02
89
1774
00
00
20
16
00
05
48
15
00
04
31
10
00
12
83
11
00
08
11
13
00
01
92
14
00
00
20
12
00
00
97
8
00
11
10
7
00
05
48
2
00
04
90
1
00
00
20
VhVjk
1848
00
04
66
Fkkuk uacj&75
1846
00
00
20
1849
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4427
1845
00
05
61
1844
00
07
30
1843
00
00
20
1842
00
10
54
1838
00
00
20
1841
00
01
72
1840
00
00
25
fct;iwj
793
00
13
92
Fkkuk uacj&136
792
00
05
89
791
00
02
36
790
00
00
20
788
00
01
65
798
00
00
79
785
00
08
07
784
00
16
14
783
00
09
33
807
00
00
20
829
00
06
98
781
00
00
20
780
00
16
85
777
00
10
56
776
00
08
16
772
00
03
31
771
00
05
19
770
00
05
03
769
00
00
20
768
00
03
30
767
00
00
20
766
00
10
09
765
00
05
67
849
00
04
48
764
00
00
20
751
00
04
64
752
00
00
20
750
00
12
19
749
00
01
23
748
00
00
20
747
00
01
38
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4428
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
741
00
19
40
754
00
00
20
740
00
03
72
738
00
07
46
737
00
00
57
736
00
06
69
735
00
01
82
734
00
00
20
iks[kjsjk
1147
00
00
66
Fkkuk uacj&76
1148
00
00
20
1135
00
04
06
1190
00
06
07
1191
00
02
80
1134
00
07
79
1126
00
09
28
1111
00
01
02
1110
00
01
60
1104
00
00
20
1101
00
00
20
1112
00
03
90
1113
00
06
39
1114
00
06
15
1115
00
00
20
1100
00
01
61
1099
00
06
27
1098
00
00
20
1096
00
06
41
1094¼jkLrk½
00
02
19
1082
00
01
49
1083
00
09
65
1084
00
02
35
1075
00
13
33
1074
00
00
20
1064@1186
00
00
20
1065
00
06
75
1066
00
01
25
1064
00
00
45
1059
00
12
39
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4429
1058
00
00
91
1057
00
05
18
1055
00
07
06
1054
00
00
20
1049
00
00
20
1053
00
05
79
1052
00
06
26
1042
00
16
12
1040
00
10
23
1039
00
06
58
1037
00
02
11
1038
00
00
91
1032
00
02
73
1033
00
00
20
1031
00
06
85
1030
00
00
20
1021
00
05
06
1029
00
12
01
1022
00
09
86
1028
00
00
20
1017
00
16
59
1013
00
02
43
1014
00
09
57
1015
00
00
20
1016
00
00
20
dqynhik
409
00
02
40
Fkkuk uacj&77
410
00
08
98
411
00
00
78
412
00
02
75
406
00
00
20
413
00
04
15
405
00
01
79
414
00
00
38
392
00
06
76
393
00
00
20
376
00
00
44
377
00
02
10
391
00
01
56
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4430
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
383
00
05
45
382
00
03
80
381
00
04
27
380
00
02
93
379
00
02
71
378
00
02
00
293
00
14
39
292
00
00
20
360
00
00
20
359
00
01
41
296
00
07
27
295
00
00
20
299
00
06
84
300
00
03
87
304
00
09
05
306
00
06
75
305
00
00
20
307
00
06
64
yNehiwj
1287
00
01
49
Fkkuk uacj&78
1288
00
16
26
1289
00
00
20
1290
00
01
71
1292
00
00
89
1293
00
01
14
1294
00
00
32
1296
00
00
20
1291
00
11
19
1372
00
00
20
1342
00
13
47
1341
00
00
20
1340
00
00
20
1339
00
00
20
1346
00
14
99
1338
00
14
43
1348
00
00
20
1337
00
01
94
1336
00
04
81
1276 ¼jsyos½
00
06
33
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4431
1262@1408¼jsyos½
00
01
25
1172@1407¼jsyos½
00
01
03
1171@1409¼jsyos½
00
04
37
1171¼jkLrk½
00
04
29
1107
00
05
89
1167
00
00
47
1168
00
00
20
1108
00
01
47
1109
00
01
64
1110
00
01
66
1111
00
01
87
1115
00
00
20
1113
00
00
59
1112
00
01
02
1166
00
03
94
1165
00
04
21
1164
00
04
19
191
00
03
85
192
00
03
93
193
00
00
94
194
00
04
91
195
00
00
77
196
00
14
27
205
00
00
20
198
00
01
88
200
00
04
93
199
00
04
51
158
00
00
91
157
00
08
37
154
00
04
18
156
00
00
20
155
00
03
15
153
00
00
20
151
00
12
25
150
00
00
20
70
00
12
66
69
00
00
46
71
00
02
09
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4432
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
68
00
08
85
67
00
00
20
66
00
03
99
72
00
02
51
78 ¼jkLrk½
00
02
22
65¼jkLrk½
00
00
20
81
00
02
55
82
00
00
20
80
00
06
78
97¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
02
33
98@1402
00
01
83
108
00
07
62
109
00
00
20
101
00
01
09
102
00
01
11
103
00
00
76
104
00
00
20
107
00
09
75
106
00
12
74
csykliqj
220
00
03
13
Fkkuk uacj&79
221
00
02
88
219
00
00
20
225
00
04
31
226
00
02
64
227
00
00
20
218
00
07
57
217
00
00
20
247
00
00
20
248
00
00
20
241
00
00
53
240
00
00
20
246
00
04
93
245
00
04
87
250
00
00
20
251
00
00
20
253
00
00
29
254
00
00
26
252
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4433
244
00
03
16
255
00
02
64
256
00
00
20
257
00
00
20
243
00
01
89
242
00
00
20
259
00
04
46
258
00
00
46
260
00
00
93
261
00
04
78
262
00
02
65
267
00
00
27
268
00
00
20
269
00
00
20
266
00
01
60
272
00
00
20
273
00
00
20
265
00
02
27
264
00
03
45
263
00
00
99
164
00
00
20
275
00
02
39
274
00
00
20
276
00
00
20
163
00
07
68
166
00
04
69
162
00
03
71
161@462
00
00
20
157@461
00
00
20
161
00
03
93
157
00
07
53
156
00
08
82
149
00
00
50
148
00
00
20
155
00
00
20
144
00
02
07
154
00
08
39
194¼jsyos½
00
06
00
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4434
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
lsorkiwj
2393¼jkLrk½
00
01
22
Fkkuk uacj&44
2390
00
03
79
2392
00
02
91
2304
00
13
09
2391
00
01
24
2303
00
01
49
2302
00
13
33
2301
00
02
03
2394 jkLrk
00
02
57
2289
00
00
20
2290
00
04
40
2291&dPpk jkLrk
00
00
20
2267
00
15
74
2266
00
07
72
2268
00
00
20
2264
00
00
98
2265
00
01
39
2263
00
02
44
2262
00
07
41
2261
00
03
98
2260
00
00
79
2217¼jkLrk½
00
04
60
2215
00
00
20
2214
00
01
98
2213
00
03
75
2212
00
01
27
2211
00
04
41
2177
00
00
20
2210
00
04
44
2187
00
03
86
2186
00
04
00
2185
00
05
16
2184
00
07
12
2183
00
00
20
2182
00
00
20
2179
00
01
75
2178
00
01
17
2180
00
01
98
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4435
2181
00
02
39
2103¼jkLrk½
00
01
46
2103@4746
00
09
16
2068
00
00
37
2072
00
00
67
2071
00
04
66
2073
00
00
20
2074
00
06
24
2075
00
00
20
2079
00
02
15
2078
00
01
95
2080
00
00
20
2081
00
03
31
2083
00
03
77
2089
00
00
20
2088
00
09
14
2087
00
03
63
2091
00
00
63
2086
00
00
20
2092
00
12
25
2093
00
00
20
1982
00
16
72
1981
00
03
89
1769¼jkLrk½
00
01
72
539
00
04
56
547
00
03
96
540
00
00
36
548
00
00
36
546
00
06
18
545
00
02
65
549
00
05
02
550
00
01
72
551
00
03
37
552
00
06
26
556
00
04
81
553
00
00
31
553@4707
00
02
68
555
00
06
73
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4436
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
554
00
01
40
566
00
03
22
567
00
00
84
565
00
11
51
568
00
01
27
564
00
00
30
562
00
01
14
570
00
08
14
571
00
00
20
563
00
00
20
575
00
07
34
574
00
00
59
576
00
02
86
579
00
03
62
580
00
03
73
578
00
00
79
614
00
00
20
647
00
03
64
646
00
02
79
645
00
02
91
643
00
01
32
644
00
08
06
725
00
00
20
642
00
01
87
641
00
01
83
640
00
00
20
726
00
06
01
723
00
00
62
727
00
09
71
728
00
01
61
735
00
00
74
734
00
06
47
733
00
05
32
745
00
00
20
746
00
01
24
751
00
05
53
750
00
10
30
752
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4437
761
00
16
46
762
00
00
20
763
00
00
20
764¼jkLrk½
00
03
30
772
00
03
74
773
00
00
20
771
00
02
03
774
00
04
46
770
00
00
20
769
00
00
20
775
00
05
79
776
00
00
35
777
00
01
00
284
00
00
20
278
00
11
55
279
00
00
82
277
00
04
45
276
00
04
41
280
00
00
20
275
00
03
06
268
00
06
23
266
00
05
32
265
00
02
08
264
00
02
71
263
00
08
93
154
00
01
24
262
00
05
56
165
00
02
25
248
00
00
20
166
00
05
28
167
00
00
20
247
00
02
41
168
00
07
35
169
00
05
64
170@4702
00
00
20
242
00
00
99
241
00
07
77
240
00
01
82
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4438
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
239
00
08
40
237
00
12
38
236
00
00
20
233
00
02
26
234
00
27
92
231
00
06
84
186&dPpk jkLrk
00
03
15
188
00
04
46
353 ¼unh½
00
06
57
¹iQk- la- vkj&25011@15@2013&vksvkj&Iº
iou oqQekj] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 5th August, 2013
S.O. 1627.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest
that a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited in Dist. Siwan in the State of Bihar for ‘Patna
to Motihari and Baitalpur Pipeline’ for the transportation of Petroleum Product;
And, whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is
necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which
is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and
Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby
declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the
date on which the copies of the notification issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as
published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of
the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land, to Shri Arun Kumar Jha B.A.S. & Competent
Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited. (Pipelines Division) P.O. Dhelwan, Sipara, Dist. Patna (Bihar.)
Pin – 800020.
SCHEDULE
Dist.: Siwan
State : Bihar
Mouja / Village
Survey/Block No.
Sub-Div-No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
MAKUNDPUR
469
00
00
27
Thana No-157
470
00
00
20
468
00
00
91
467
00
01
28
466
00
01
75
462
00
03
93
463
00
00
20
461
00
02
39
460
00
02
46
457
00
00
20
459
00
00
79
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4439
458
00
04
78
454
00
00
20
450 (Cart Track)
00
09
50
36
00
05
38
37
00
00
29
35
00
21
10
40
00
01
40
34
00
09
45
41
00
00
20
33
00
02
08
32
00
00
40
52
00
02
92
82
00
03
83
31
00
00
20
30
00
06
18
23
00
08
12
25
00
00
20
24
00
03
63
22
00
05
61
27
00
00
20
21
00
03
72
16
00
00
20
28
00
00
20
20
00
01
68
18
00
01
91
17
00
00
20
19
00
03
01
9
00
03
31
8
00
00
20
BHALUA MUKUND
405
00
00
20
Thana No-158
404
00
00
20
403
00
00
20
266
00
00
20
81
00
09
69
85
00
00
20
82
00
01
90
83
00
00
20
84
00
00
20
80
00
01
36
78
00
02
78
77/454
00
04
03
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4440
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
76
00
14
85
75
00
00
20
74
00
04
24
73/455
00
02
74
72
00
06
97
70
00
02
71
71
00
03
61
69
00
03
86
68
00
00
20
63
00
00
34
62
00
00
20
NAND PALI
324
00
00
20
Thana No-159
319
00
02
62
318
00
05
63
317
00
00
20
297
00
15
67
298
00
02
44
296
00
19
17
267
00
02
15
268
00
06
53
598
00
09
56
261
00
02
32
265
00
16
79
262
00
04
25
263
00
01
78
264
00
08
34
JIRADEI
1990
00
03
98
Thana No-152
1988
00
01
52
1991
00
00
20
SURWAL
1625 (ROAD)
00
00
20
Thana No-139
2285 (ROAD)
00
01
24
2287 (ROAD)
00
02
18
2261
00
02
53
2257
00
05
02
2260
00
07
57
2259
00
00
62
2251
00
16
04
2250
00
18
31
2241
00
11
97
2242
00
00
20
2223
00
36
98
2163
00
16
81
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4441
2162
00
00
20
2161
00
00
39
2164
00
13
58
2165
00
00
20
2160
00
02
23
2159
00
00
20
2157
00
04
45
2166
00
11
17
2156
00
04
37
2167
00
02
53
2168
00
13
51
2154
00
00
49
2153
00
00
43
2169
00
06
61
2152
00
00
90
2170
00
05
89
2171
00
04
84
2172
00
02
79
2151
00
01
19
2150
00
01
37
2173
00
03
04
2149
00
01
43
2174
00
02
59
2148
00
04
63
2175
00
02
34
2146 (ROAD)
00
01
70
2143
00
08
02
2142
00
10
03
2125
00
18
00
2124
00
09
09
2123
00
00
20
2117
00
00
20
2116
00
04
31
2115
00
04
79
2114
00
18
53
2030
00
00
20
2031
00
00
20
2032
00
00
20
2033
00
00
20
2113
00
00
20
2069
00
08
97
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4442
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2070
00
00
20
2068
00
00
20
2067
00
00
20
2066
00
00
20
748
00
10
05
781
00
00
20
774
00
02
95
775
00
00
20
773
00
07
76
769
00
01
72
772
00
00
20
771
00
00
20
770
00
00
20
767
00
02
31
763
00
07
58
765
00
12
56
764
00
00
20
659 (ROAD)
00
01
43
652
00
01
32
653
00
05
88
651
00
00
20
656
00
01
58
655
00
01
72
654
00
04
38
657
00
00
20
629
00
01
68
628
00
02
41
626
00
11
24
627
00
00
20
630
00
00
20
625
00
00
20
624
00
00
20
384
00
03
76
385
00
07
62
374
00
00
20
386 (ROAD)
00
00
20
397
00
03
97
398
00
04
90
399
00
02
67
402
00
02
37
403
00
02
42
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4443
408
00
02
46
409
00
00
20
410
00
02
58
413
00
03
43
415
00
02
13
420
00
00
20
421
00
06
60
422
00
02
95
439
00
02
70
423
00
04
33
438
00
02
93
437
00
00
76
428
00
00
20
436
00
09
02
434
00
09
67
435
00
00
20
432
00
05
60
433
00
11
08
462
00
00
20
464
00
03
88
483
00
00
20
484
00
05
86
485
00
03
78
486
00
00
20
463
00
00
31
492
00
01
27
488
00
03
10
491
00
02
20
494
00
00
20
490
00
02
49
489
00
01
71
495
00
02
02
477
00
01
37
476
00
00
42
475
00
00
20
496
00
05
54
497
00
00
85
500 (ROAD)
00
01
53
46
00
08
43
63
00
00
20
64
00
12
45
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4444
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
45
00
09
85
43
00
00
20
42
00
00
20
44
00
02
44
MUIAN
2913
00
05
31
Thana No. 137
2924
00
00
20
2912
00
02
94
2914
00
02
65
2915
00
06
03
2916
00
03
45
2917
00
06
75
2918
00
04
61
2919
00
03
83
2920
00
07
44
2909
00
00
20
2857
00
09
33
2904
00
09
06
2903
00
00
97
2901
00
00
20
2902
00
02
74
2863
00
00
20
2864
00
00
20
2869
00
07
36
2868
00
07
17
2867
00
11
58
2871
00
00
20
2653
00
01
02
2652
00
16
11
2676
00
00
20
2677
00
00
20
2678
00
03
12
2679
00
05
24
2680
00
04
26
2651
00
00
20
2650
00
01
27
2681
00
10
72
2698
00
00
20
2697
00
00
20
2682
00
01
48
2683
00
00
50
2684
00
11
06
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4445
2686
00
05
42
2687
00
00
20
2691
00
00
20
2688
00
03
92
2638
00
00
20
2637
00
10
60
2689
00
00
20
2690
00
00
20
2634
00
00
20
2632
00
00
20
2636
00
02
86
2635
00
05
37
2628
00
02
84
2629
00
06
61
2630
00
00
88
2627
00
01
24
2624
00
14
18
2625
00
22
89
1499
00
02
96
1500
00
00
60
1509
00
05
82
1498
00
00
20
1510
00
00
20
1511
00
00
20
1508
00
10
19
1507
00
00
20
1505
00
00
20
2021-Nala
00
01
81
1512
00
00
20
2023
00
14
25
2022
00
02
83
2024
00
01
47
2020
00
04
14
2018
00
16
31
2019
00
00
20
2017
00
00
41
2011
00
08
67
2012
00
00
20
2006
00
06
15
2007 (NALA)
00
01
62
1863
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4446
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1881
00
00
20
1882
00
04
46
1883
00
06
59
1885
00
00
54
1884
00
03
72
1886
00
00
46
1887
00
00
20
1880
00
09
96
1878
00
06
97
1877
00
00
20
1879
00
00
20
1872
00
10
55
1873
00
06
05
1828
00
07
69
1827
00
00
20
1829
00
02
61
1830
00
02
60
1750-Cart Track
00
00
20
1826
00
03
66
1825
00
01
14
1823
00
00
20
1822
00
00
20
1821
00
00
20
1820
00
00
20
1824
00
04
38
1751
00
12
05
1755
00
13
79
1760
00
01
35
1759
00
09
60
1756
00
00
20
1762
00
00
20
1758
00
06
80
1763
00
08
72
1757 (CART TRACK)
00
00
20
75
00
00
20
74
00
00
20
72
00
00
20
1766
00
06
28
73
00
04
28
1767
00
02
68
1768
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4447
1770
00
09
85
1771
00
08
33
22
00
00
42
18
00
01
33
1772
00
09
72
19
00
00
20
17
00
06
95
1773
00
02
89
1774
00
00
20
16
00
05
48
15
00
04
31
10
00
12
83
11
00
08
11
13
00
01
92
14
00
00
20
12
00
00
97
8
00
11
10
7
00
05
48
2
00
04
90
1
00
00
20
TITRA
1848
00
04
66
Thana No. 75
1846
00
00
20
1849
00
00
20
1845
00
05
61
1844
00
07
30
1843
00
00
20
1842
00
10
54
1838
00
00
20
1841
00
01
72
1840
00
00
25
BIJAIPUR
793
00
13
92
Thana No. 136
792
00
05
89
791
00
02
36
790
00
00
20
788
00
01
65
798
00
00
79
785
00
08
07
784
00
16
14
783
00
09
33
807
00
00
20
829
00
06
98
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4448
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
781
00
00
20
780
00
16
85
777
00
10
56
776
00
08
16
772
00
03
31
771
00
05
19
770
00
05
03
769
00
00
20
768
00
03
30
767
00
00
20
766
00
10
09
765
00
05
67
849
00
04
48
764
00
00
20
751
00
04
64
752
00
00
20
750
00
12
19
749
00
01
23
748
00
00
20
747
00
01
38
741
00
19
40
754
00
00
20
740
00
03
72
738
00
07
46
737
00
00
57
736
00
06
69
735
00
01
82
734
00
00
20
POKHRERA
1147
00
00
66
Thana No. 76
1148
00
00
20
1135
00
04
06
1190
00
06
07
1191
00
02
80
1134
00
07
79
1126
00
09
28
1111
00
01
02
1110
00
01
60
1104
00
00
20
1101
00
00
20
1112
00
03
90
1113
00
06
39
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4449
1114
00
06
15
1115
00
00
20
1100
00
01
61
1099
00
06
27
1098
00
00
20
1096
00
06
41
1094(ROAD)
00
02
19
1082
00
01
49
1083
00
09
65
1084
00
02
35
1075
00
13
33
1074
00
00
20
1064/1186
00
00
20
1065
00
06
75
1066
00
01
25
1064
00
00
45
1059
00
12
39
1058
00
00
91
1057
00
05
18
1055
00
07
06
1054
00
00
20
1049
00
00
20
1053
00
05
79
1052
00
06
26
1042
00
16
12
1040
00
10
23
1039
00
06
58
1037
00
02
11
1038
00
00
91
1032
00
02
73
1033
00
00
20
1031
00
06
85
1030
00
00
20
1021
00
05
06
1029
00
12
01
1022
00
09
86
1028
00
00
20
1017
00
16
59
1013
00
02
43
1014
00
09
57
1015
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4450
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1016
00
00
20
KULDIPA
409
00
02
40
Thana No. 77
410
00
08
98
411
00
00
78
412
00
02
75
406
00
00
20
413
00
04
15
405
00
01
79
414
00
00
38
392
00
06
76
393
00
00
20
376
00
00
44
377
00
02
10
391
00
01
56
383
00
05
45
382
00
03
80
381
00
04
27
380
00
02
93
379
00
02
71
378
00
02
00
293
00
14
39
292
00
00
20
360
00
00
20
359
00
01
41
296
00
07
27
295
00
00
20
299
00
06
84
300
00
03
87
304
00
09
05
306
00
06
75
305
00
00
20
307
00
06
64
LACHHMIPUR
1287
00
01
49
Thana No. 78
1288
00
16
26
1289
00
00
20
1290
00
01
71
1292
00
00
89
1293
00
01
14
1294
00
00
32
1296
00
00
20
1291
00
11
19
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4451
1372
00
00
20
1342
00
13
47
1341
00
00
20
1340
00
00
20
1339
00
00
20
1346
00
14
99
1338
00
14
43
1348
00
00
20
1337
00
01
94
1336
00
04
81
1276 (RAILWAY)
00
06
33
1262/1408 (RAILWAY)
00
01
25
1172/1407 (RAILWAY)
00
01
03
1171/1409 (RAILWAY)
00
04
37
1171 (ROAD)
00
04
29
1107
00
05
89
1167
00
00
47
1168
00
00
20
1108
00
01
47
1109
00
01
64
1110
00
01
66
1111
00
01
87
1115
00
00
20
1113
00
00
59
1112
00
01
02
1166
00
03
94
1165
00
04
21
1164
00
04
19
191
00
03
85
192
00
03
93
193
00
00
94
194
00
04
91
195
00
00
77
196
00
14
27
205
00
00
20
198
00
01
88
200
00
04
93
199
00
04
51
158
00
00
91
157
00
08
37
154
00
04
18
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4452
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
156
00
00
20
155
00
03
15
153
00
00
20
151
00
12
25
150
00
00
20
70
00
12
66
69
00
00
46
71
00
02
09
68
00
08
85
67
00
00
20
66
00
03
99
72
00
02
51
78 (Road)
00
02
22
65 (ROAD)
00
00
20
81
00
02
55
82
00
00
20
80
00
06
78
97 (CART TRACK)
00
02
33
98/1402
00
01
83
108
00
07
62
109
00
00
20
101
00
01
09
102
00
01
11
103
00
00
76
104
00
00
20
107
00
09
75
106
00
12
74
BELASPUR
220
00
03
13
Thana No. 79
221
00
02
88
219
00
00
20
225
00
04
31
226
00
02
64
227
00
00
20
218
00
07
57
217
00
00
20
247
00
00
20
248
00
00
20
241
00
00
53
240
00
00
20
246
00
04
93
245
00
04
87
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4453
250
00
00
20
251
00
00
20
253
00
00
29
254
00
00
26
252
00
00
20
244
00
03
16
255
00
02
64
256
00
00
20
257
00
00
20
243
00
01
89
242
00
00
20
259
00
04
46
258
00
00
46
260
00
00
93
261
00
04
78
262
00
02
65
267
00
00
27
268
00
00
20
269
00
00
20
266
00
01
60
272
00
00
20
273
00
00
20
265
00
02
27
264
00
03
45
263
00
00
99
164
00
00
20
275
00
02
39
274
00
00
20
276
00
00
20
163
00
07
68
166
00
04
69
162
00
03
71
161/462
00
00
20
157/461
00
00
20
161
00
03
93
157
00
07
53
156
00
08
82
149
00
00
50
148
00
00
20
155
00
00
20
144
00
02
07
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4454
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
154
00
08
39
194(RAILWAY)
00
06
00
SEWTAPUR
2393-Road
00
01
22
Thana No-44
2390
00
03
79
2392
00
02
91
2304
00
13
09
2391
00
01
24
2303
00
01
49
2302
00
13
33
2301
00
02
03
2394 Road
00
02
57
2289
00
00
20
2290
00
04
40
2291Cart Track
00
00
20
2267
00
15
74
2266
00
07
72
2268
00
00
20
2264
00
00
98
2265
00
01
39
2263
00
02
44
2262
00
07
41
2261
00
03
98
2260
00
00
79
2217-Road
00
04
60
2215
00
00
20
2214
00
01
98
2213
00
03
75
2212
00
01
27
2211
00
04
41
2177
00
00
20
2210
00
04
44
2187
00
03
86
2186
00
04
00
2185
00
05
16
2184
00
07
12
2183
00
00
20
2182
00
00
20
2179
00
01
75
2178
00
01
17
2180
00
01
98
2181
00
02
39
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4455
2103-Road
00
01
46
2103/4746
00
09
16
2068
00
00
37
2072
00
00
67
2071
00
04
66
2073
00
00
20
2074
00
06
24
2075
00
00
20
2079
00
02
15
2078
00
01
95
2080
00
00
20
2081
00
03
31
2083
00
03
77
2089
00
00
20
2088
00
09
14
2087
00
03
63
2091
00
00
63
2086
00
00
20
2092
00
12
25
2093
00
00
20
1982
00
16
72
1981
00
03
89
1769-Road
00
01
72
539
00
04
56
547
00
03
96
540
00
00
36
548
00
00
36
546
00
06
18
545
00
02
65
549
00
05
02
550
00
01
72
551
00
03
37
552
00
06
26
556
00
04
81
553
00
00
31
553/4707
00
02
68
555
00
06
73
554
00
01
40
566
00
03
22
567
00
00
84
565
00
11
51
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4456
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
568
00
01
27
564
00
00
30
562
00
01
14
570
00
08
14
571
00
00
20
563
00
00
20
575
00
07
34
574
00
00
59
576
00
02
86
579
00
03
62
580
00
03
73
578
00
00
79
614
00
00
20
647
00
03
64
646
00
02
79
645
00
02
91
643
00
01
32
644
00
08
06
725
00
00
20
642
00
01
87
641
00
01
83
640
00
00
20
726
00
06
01
723
00
00
62
727
00
09
71
728
00
01
61
735
00
00
74
734
00
06
47
733
00
05
32
745
00
00
20
746
00
01
24
751
00
05
53
750
00
10
30
752
00
00
20
761
00
16
46
762
00
00
20
763
00
00
20
764-Road
00
03
30
772
00
03
74
773
00
00
20
771
00
02
03
774
00
04
46
770
00
00
20
769
00
00
20
775
00
05
79
776
00
00
35
777
00
01
00
284
00
00
20
278
00
11
55
279
00
00
82
277
00
04
45
276
00
04
41
280
00
00
20
275
00
03
06
268
00
06
23
266
00
05
32
265
00
02
08
264
00
02
71
263
00
08
93
154
00
01
24
262
00
05
56
165
00
02
25
248
00
00
20
166
00
05
28
167
00
00
20
247
00
02
41
168
00
07
35
169
00
05
64
170/4702
00
00
20
242
00
00
99
241
00
07
77
240
00
01
82
239
00
08
40
237
00
12
38
236
00
00
20
233
00
02
26
234
00
27
92
231
00
06
84
186 Cart Track
00
03
15
188
00
04
46
353 River
00
06
57
[F. No. R-25011/15/2013-OR-I]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4457
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
ubZ fnYyh] 5 vxLr] 2013
dk-vk- 1628-&&dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slk izrhr gksrk gS fd yksd fgr esa ;g vko”;d gS fd iVuk ls eksfrgkjh vkSj
csrkyiqj rd isVªksfy;e inkFkks± ds ifjogu gsrq ftyk iVuk] jkT; fcgkj esa bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs”ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbiykbu
fcNkbZ tkuh pkfg, A
vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slh ikbiykbu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, vko”;d izrhr gksrk gS fd ml Hkwfe esa ftlds
Hkhrj mDr ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkus dk izLrko gS vkSj tks bl vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa of.kZr gS] mi;ksx dk vtZu fd;k
tk,(
vr%] vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] iSVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbUl ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½ vf/kfu;e] 1962
¼1962 dk 50½ dh /kkjk 3 dh mi/kkjk¼1½ }kjk iznÙk “kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] mDr Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/akdkj dk vtZu
djus ds vius vk”k; dh ?kks’k.kk djrh gSA
dksbZ O;fDr] tks mDr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa fgrc) gS] ml rkjh[k ls ftldks] Hkkjr ds jkti= esa ;Fkk izdkf”kr
bl vf/klwpuk dh izfr;ka lk/kkj.k turk dks miyC/k djk nh tkrh gS] bDdhl fnu ds vUnj] Hkwfe ds Hkhrj ikbiykbu fcNk,
tkus gsrq mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj ds vtZu ds fy,] Jh v:.k dqekj >k] fc-iz-ls- o l{ke izkf/kdkjh bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs”ku
fyfeVsM] ¼ikbiykbu fMohtu½ iVuk] iks-vks- <syok] flikjk] ftyk iVuk] fiu %&800020] fcgkj dks fyf[kr :i eas vk{ksi Hkst
ldsxkA
vuqlwph
rglhy % iVuk
jkT; % fcgkj
ekStk@xzke
losZ@Cykd@la- (IyksV la-)
lc&Mho&la-
{ks=kiQy
gsDVs;j
vkjs
oxZ ehVj
1
2
3
4
5
6
bczkgheiqj
230
00
05
22
Fkkuk uacj&61
229
00
11
63
228
00
05
92
227
00
00
20
220
00
01
10
223
00
03
83
224
00
02
27
225
00
02
57
226
00
05
23
60
00
06
04
61
00
00
38
54
00
04
30
53
00
03
98
52
00
03
20
51
00
07
84
50
00
02
53
49
00
01
08
64
00
01
42
4458
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4459
66
00
09
40
21
00
00
20
67
00
00
20
8
00
07
57
5
00
03
56
7
00
06
30
6
00
01
57
9
00
00
65
2
00
05
99
10
00
00
20
vYgkuiqjk
2451
00
00
74
Fkkuk uacj&60
2450
00
04
26
2440
00
12
01
2449
00
00
20
2439
00
06
42
2437
00
01
08
2438
00
06
86
2441 ¼ukyk½
00
01
92
2422 ¼ukyk½
00
06
19
1393
00
00
50
1396
00
03
13
1397
00
05
74
1398
00
05
81
2358
00
06
04
2359
00
00
20
2357
00
03
74
2361
00
00
37
2343
00
04
04
2341
00
00
20
2342
00
04
45
2362
00
00
20
2363
00
00
20
2364
00
05
42
2365
00
01
32
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4460
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2340
00
04
84
2367
00
00
47
2368
00
00
30
2336
00
05
71
2335
00
03
47
2334
00
06
38
2333
00
00
20
2318
00
11
14
2314
00
03
37
2315
00
05
36
1868 ¼jkLrk½
00
01
24
2209
00
00
20
2204
00
09
98
2203
00
14
12
2202 ¼jkLrk½
00
01
85
2167
00
00
20
2168
00
04
76
2169
00
03
08
2170
00
05
46
2171
00
02
10
2173
00
09
89
2199
00
00
20
2197
00
03
82
2196
00
09
16
2195
00
01
72
2194
00
01
80
ek/kksiqj
465
00
00
20
Fkkuk uacj&64
464
00
06
60
463
00
00
20
cthniqj
¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
00
96
Fkkuk uacj&65
1349 ¼jsyos½
00
00
20
1347 ¼jsyos½
00
00
20
1348 ¼jsyos½
00
04
14
1346 ¼jsyos½
00
05
83
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4461
1345 ¼jsyos½
00
03
83
1259 ¼jsyos½
00
04
94
1253
00
02
47
1254
00
00
20
1252
00
08
22
1251
00
00
20
chlquiqjk
3224
00
09
96
Fkkuk uacj&66
3225
00
08
81
3227
00
00
20
3226
00
05
69
3222
00
00
20
3221
00
05
51
3220
00
05
81
3219
00
06
66
3217
00
00
37
3181
00
06
29
3182
00
00
20
3180
00
02
92
2895
00
00
78
2894
00
00
20
2893
00
02
86
2892
00
03
58
2889
00
00
20
2900
00
06
97
2899
00
05
03
2898
00
00
20
2890
00
02
11
2901 ¼jkLrk½
00
02
69
3249 ¼jkLrk½
00
01
15
2547
00
68
46
2546
00
00
72
2545
00
01
45
2538
00
04
88
2539
00
03
64
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4462
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2540
00
03
70
2536
00
00
20
2511
00
00
20
2541
00
01
12
2542
00
00
25
2452
00
00
20
2453
00
00
20
2451
00
06
67
2450
00
05
74
2449
00
01
62
2465
00
00
20
2446
00
01
78
2447
00
02
30
2448
00
03
97
2363
00
04
51
2362
00
00
20
2364
00
02
24
2365
00
00
20
2418
00
01
85
2419
00
01
72
2420
00
00
20
2422
00
00
20
2423
00
01
37
2424
00
03
47
1565 ¼jkLrk½
00
01
18
1117
00
00
20
1116
00
03
31
1115
00
00
34
1135
00
04
45
1134
00
00
20
1140
00
01
43
1139
00
02
66
1138
00
00
20
1141
00
03
17
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4463
1158
00
03
46
1161
00
03
42
1169
00
01
72
1171
00
00
83
1170
00
00
56
1191
00
02
50
1190
00
00
70
1192
00
00
32
1189
00
04
46
1203
00
00
20
1204
00
01
37
1205
00
05
60
1206
00
01
43
1220
00
01
16
1277
00
03
29
1282
00
01
46
1283
00
02
66
1295
00
02
51
1296
00
04
04
1302
00
01
46
1303
00
01
80
1308
00
03
10
1309
00
00
98
1310
00
01
18
1273
00
07
06
1311
00
01
67
1312
00
00
20
1317
00
00
20
1324
00
00
20
1323
00
00
20
1325
00
00
77
1326
00
00
40
1327
00
00
71
1342
00
01
10
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4464
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1341
00
01
31
1340
00
01
24
1328
00
08
39
1339
00
01
22
1336
00
01
24
1335
00
00
79
1331
00
01
63
1329
00
05
77
1330
00
03
01
681
00
07
34
683
00
01
68
680
00
02
95
682
00
14
02
522 ¼jkLrk vsl-vsp-&78½
00
04
38
362
00
00
36
368
00
02
42
404
00
00
20
369
00
02
35
371
00
00
82
370
00
01
44
374
00
02
06
375
00
02
30
376
00
00
73
377
00
00
94
378
00
02
21
379
00
02
44
380
00
02
50
381
00
02
00
382
00
01
68
384
00
01
82
394
00
00
20
395
00
05
96
397
00
03
31
398
00
01
33
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4465
399
00
02
23
396
00
05
22
ij[kksrheiqj iSukBh
1083
00
03
14
Fkkuk uacj&68
1082
00
02
00
1081
00
04
10
1084
00
10
40
1080
00
09
68
1135
00
01
15
1134
00
06
74
1140
00
00
20
1141
00
07
45
1142
00
00
20
1146
00
04
36
1148
00
02
44
1147
00
09
65
1172
00
01
45
1171 ¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
01
48
1145
00
00
20
1208
00
02
76
1209
00
11
15
1210
00
00
20
1211
00
00
20
1201
00
00
20
1202
00
00
20
1203
00
00
20
1205
00
04
72
1204
00
03
49
1196
00
03
12
1197
00
00
25
1195
00
02
35
1194
00
00
20
1193
00
07
67
1191
00
02
63
1187¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
00
95
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4466
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
961
00
00
20
962
00
09
42
963
00
02
75
960
00
00
20
959
00
00
20
964
00
02
27
965
00
04
02
957
00
00
20
958
00
00
20
956
00
00
29
941
00
06
23
955
00
00
65
954
00
01
09
944
00
02
36
945
00
02
58
953
00
01
44
952
00
02
66
951
00
01
90
950
00
03
31
1256
00
00
50
927
00
04
98
929
00
00
20
928
00
02
94
926
00
00
48
925
00
00
20
923
00
05
29
922
00
00
91
907 ¼ukyk½
00
02
08
906 ¼ukyk½
00
01
24
905 ¼ukyk½
00
01
18
619 ¼ukyk½
00
01
12
614
00
02
42
615
00
02
89
616
00
07
68
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4467
617
00
00
86
618
00
00
20
610
00
00
42
622
00
04
82
624
00
01
34
623
00
01
96
625
00
01
93
626
00
01
80
627
00
02
66
628
00
06
37
629
00
02
23
630
00
00
20
619 ¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
01
22
619 ¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
01
96
680
00
00
20
679
00
00
90
678
00
06
65
906 ¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
01
24
645
00
00
20
661
00
01
94
671
00
03
89
673
00
00
20
670
00
00
20
672
00
05
83
667
00
07
03
666
00
00
20
125 ¼jkLrk½
00
03
24
107
00
00
20
109
00
03
79
110
00
09
32
112
00
04
66
113
00
00
94
111
00
02
53
115
00
09
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4468
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
118
00
00
62
117
00
08
38
116
00
09
68
10
00
00
25
11
00
01
26
18
00
03
13
19
00
00
20
17
00
01
76
12
00
02
84
16
00
00
90
15
00
00
20
14
00
00
20
13
00
07
50
31 ¼ukyk½
00
01
04
32
00
01
12
44
00
00
25
47
00
04
25
48
00
04
86
49
00
04
68
46
00
01
14
50
00
07
42
9 ¼dPpk jkLrk½
00
04
27
51 ¼jkLrk½
00
01
15
52 ¼jkLrk½
00
01
32
53 ¼jkLrk½
00
01
20
1 ¼jkLrk½
00
00
20
2
00
00
20
dqryqiqj
2719 ¼jkLrk½
00
00
82
Fkkuk uacj&56
1196
00
00
20
1197
00
17
47
2726
00
05
20
1193
00
01
69
1200 ¼jkLrk½
00
01
39
1225
00
01
33
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4469
1226
00
19
37
2725
00
00
20
1240
00
08
30
1239
00
11
53
1242
00
03
34
1243
00
03
12
1078
00
00
20
1082
00
05
40
1081
00
10
73
1080
00
05
65
1065
00
00
20
1064
00
05
66
1063
00
03
65
927
00
02
76
928
00
09
13
929
00
07
52
931
00
05
40
918
00
00
20
917
00
05
29
916
00
05
92
915
00
00
20
705
00
00
40
706
00
08
72
707
00
01
45
708
00
00
20
711
00
00
20
907
00
00
90
906
00
01
94
905
00
03
32
902
00
01
30
904
00
01
10
903
00
04
96
898
00
00
20
897
00
00
32
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4470
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
896
00
03
07
895
00
05
15
894
00
00
20
761
00
02
39
760
00
00
20
762
00
03
00
765
00
01
74
763
00
00
82
764
00
02
58
766
00
06
04
767
00
03
67
768
00
00
20
750
00
00
20
749
00
01
66
771
00
11
77
772
00
00
76
776
00
00
20
747
00
02
89
745
00
10
27
746
00
00
64
744
00
00
20
743
00
04
36
742
00
02
06
741
00
00
20
788
00
08
69
789
00
00
20
552
00
00
97
553
00
04
43
554
00
03
16
555
00
04
16
531
00
01
44
530
00
00
25
511@2716
00
07
65
529
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4471
528
00
01
33
511
00
09
80
513
00
00
20
512
00
03
06
509
00
00
20
508
00
08
94
507
00
05
56
515
00
00
20
eqUlsiqj
938
00
00
65
Fkkuk uacj&19
939
00
00
20
936
00
07
18
935
00
03
55
934
00
01
49
933
00
00
22
922¼ukyk½
00
00
91
952
00
00
78
953
00
03
50
954
00
00
20
955
00
06
48
956
00
03
34
957
00
09
30
965
00
00
20
966
00
04
72
967
00
00
20
964
00
02
29
963
00
00
25
968
00
02
68
969
00
02
70
970
00
03
49
971
00
03
53
972
00
00
20
973
00
03
89
974
00
00
20
851
00
02
69
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4472
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
850
00
07
70
849
00
00
20
848
00
00
31
849
00
00
20
847
00
05
34
846
00
02
53
844
00
00
20
749
00
01
69
800
00
03
70
801
00
04
32
799
00
00
20
798
00
02
58
802
00
00
55
803
00
00
20
776
00
01
60
797
00
03
61
795
00
01
51
796
00
00
20
777
00
10
07
793
00
01
52
792
00
01
68
791
00
05
52
790
00
00
90
789
00
00
20
788
00
08
51
787
00
06
71
786
00
00
20
532
00
00
32
534
00
09
26
535
00
03
29
536
00
03
10
539
00
01
07
547
00
01
82
540
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4473
546
00
05
68
545
00
02
05
544
00
02
36
543
00
01
45
521
00
03
18
520
00
03
40
519
00
00
98
518
00
00
20
552¼ukyk½
00
01
36
557
00
00
20
559
00
02
94
560
00
04
76
561
00
05
87
562
00
04
38
563
00
03
64
564
00
01
31
572
00
01
34
569
00
08
24
568
00
06
36
202
00
01
12
201
00
11
71
1165
00
05
53
1164
00
03
84
8
00
07
03
7
00
06
41
ujSuiqj
408 ¼jkLrk½
00
02
44
Fkkuk uacj&20
292
00
04
99
291
00
11
43
290
00
16
71
289
00
04
40
301
00
00
91
302
00
10
58
284
00
00
20
283
00
01
17
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4474
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
282
00
03
29
281
00
01
99
280
00
02
33
279
00
00
20
303
00
00
90
176
00
19
64
177
00
02
52
178
00
00
20
175
00
01
78
174
00
00
20
179
00
26
31
187
00
01
59
184
00
08
49
185
00
08
16
75
00
02
27
183
00
01
37
76
00
12
94
98
00
13
16
97
00
08
78
96
00
01
99
95
00
00
20
102
00
12
05
103
00
02
78
16
00
00
20
20
00
13
70
21
00
05
33
22
00
00
20
25
00
00
20
19
00
05
36
18
00
02
32
17
00
00
20
26
00
11
12
4
00
07
98
34
00
01
33
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4475
vkuUniqj
2657
00
09
71
Fkkuk uacj&36
2656
00
07
61
2655
00
00
20
372
00
15
28
374 ¼jkLrk½
00
03
52
366
00
03
00
367
00
05
86
359@3598
00
04
70
359
00
07
63
356
00
07
10
202
00
03
32
203
00
15
54
200
00
04
00
204
00
24
37
192
00
07
03
133
00
06
61
135
00
11
51
136
00
12
71
124
00
09
54
120
00
15
62
117
00
13
00
118
00
04
20
112
00
09
91
111
00
00
20
110
00
11
69
109
00
19
97
108
00
01
66
71
00
01
26
ek/kksiqj-
869
00
07
21
Fkkuk uacj&21
870
00
07
51
871
00
06
71
872
00
03
78
873
00
03
31
874
00
20
14
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4476
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
889
00
06
65
890
00
00
20
878
00
00
20
884
00
14
14
881
00
00
20
885
00
00
20
883
00
07
30
882
00
07
46
886
00
00
20
880
00
00
20
1098@1414 ¼ukyk½
00
03
50
636
00
04
66
637
00
03
43
638
00
02
05
639
00
00
20
640
00
08
41
641
00
00
20
632
00
04
98
653
00
00
61
654
00
01
64
631
00
13
40
666
00
08
05
665
00
05
46
664
00
00
20
667
00
01
91
670
00
03
97
671
00
00
20
668
00
00
20
669
00
01
94
672
00
00
92
606
00
00
20
605
00
02
53
604
00
07
27
603
00
05
65
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4477
602
00
05
94
585
00
00
71
601
00
00
34
591
00
02
95
592
00
02
28
593
00
00
55
590
00
05
72
562 ¼jkLrk½
00
01
81
540
00
11
46
561
00
00
20
560
00
12
01
559
00
09
20
715
00
05
26
169
00
05
40
170
00
03
37
173
00
02
14
172
00
08
54
179
00
00
25
180
00
00
20
178
00
00
47
63
00
05
75
64
00
00
36
62@1422
00
08
65
61
00
01
07
62
00
00
20
66
00
00
20
67
00
09
89
60
00
01
24
58
00
00
20
68
00
00
20
59
00
05
93
53
00
01
37
50
00
37
06
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4478
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ekusj
341
00
00
56
Fkkuk uacj&7
334
00
03
63
333
00
05
41
332
00
08
25
225
00
09
95
226
00
05
24
245
00
04
57
255
00
04
00
250
00
00
20
254
00
01
41
258
00
00
73
257
00
00
20
261
00
00
20
259
00
02
37
260
00
04
19
263
00
03
12
264
00
02
68
266
00
02
60
267
00
02
19
268
00
00
36
269
00
00
20
270
00
00
20
203
00
09
85
204
00
11
10
207
00
02
07
205
00
03
03
193
00
00
20
206
00
07
44
191
00
02
03
190
00
05
52
104
00
04
36
189
00
05
30
188
00
07
16
185
00
12
58
184
00
06
89
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4479
180
00
05
21
181
00
00
20
179
00
05
26
178
00
01
41
168
00
00
20
176
00
04
55
175
00
01
55
171
00
04
08
173
00
01
82
174
00
00
20
172
00
00
82
¹iQk- la- vkj-&25011@16@2013&vksvkj&Iº
iou oqQekj] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 5th August, 2013
S.O. 1628.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest
that a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited in Dist. Patna in the State of Bihar for
‘Patna to Motihari and Baitalpur Pipeline’ for the transportation of Petroleum Product;
And, whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is
necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which
is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and
Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby
declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from
the date on which the copies of the notification issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as
published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition
of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land, to Shri Arun Kumar Jha B.A.S. &
Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited. (Pipelines Division) P.O. Dhelwan, Sipara, Dist. Patna
(Bihar.) Pin–800020.
SCHEDULE
Dist.: Patna
State : Bihar
Mouja / Village
Survey/BlockNo.
Sub-Div-No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
IBRAHIMPUR
230
00
05
22
Thana
229
00
11
63
Number :-61
228
00
05
92
227
00
00
20
220
00
01
10
223
00
03
83
224
00
02
27
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4480
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
225
00
02
57
226
00
05
23
60
00
06
04
61
00
00
38
54
00
04
30
53
00
03
98
52
00
03
20
51
00
07
84
50
00
02
53
49
00
01
08
64
00
01
42
66
00
09
40
21
00
00
20
67
00
00
20
8
00
07
57
5
00
03
56
7
00
06
30
6
00
01
57
9
00
00
65
2
00
05
99
10
00
00
20
ALHANPURA
2451
00
00
74
Thana
2450
00
04
26
Number:-60
2440
00
12
01
2449
00
00
20
2439
00
06
42
2437
00
01
08
2438
00
06
86
2441 (NALA)
00
01
92
2422 (NALA)
00
06
19
1393
00
00
50
1396
00
03
13
1397
00
05
74
1398
00
05
81
2358
00
06
04
2359
00
00
20
2357
00
03
74
2361
00
00
37
2343
00
04
04
2341
00
00
20
2342
00
04
45
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4481
2362
00
00
20
2363
00
00
20
2364
00
05
42
2365
00
01
32
2340
00
04
84
2367
00
00
47
2368
00
00
30
2336
00
05
71
2335
00
03
47
2334
00
06
38
2333
00
00
20
2318
00
11
14
2314
00
03
37
2315
00
05
36
1868 (ROAD)
00
01
24
2209
00
00
20
2204
00
09
98
2203
00
14
12
2202 (ROAD)
00
01
85
2167
00
00
20
2168
00
04
76
2169
00
03
08
2170
00
05
46
2171
00
02
10
2173
00
09
89
2199
00
00
20
2197
00
03
82
2196
00
09
16
2195
00
01
72
2194
00
01
80
MADHOPUR
465
00
00
20
Thana Number :- 64
464
00
06
60
463
00
00
20
BAZIDPUR
(CART TRACK)
00
00
96
Thana
1349 (RAILWAY)
00
00
20
Number :-65
1347 (RAILWAY)
00
00
20
1348 (RAILWAY)
00
04
14
1346 (RAILWAY)
00
05
83
1345 (RAILWAY)
00
03
83
1259 (RAILWAY)
00
04
94
1253
00
02
47
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4482
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1254
00
00
20
1252
00
08
22
1251
00
00
20
BISHUNPURA
3224
00
09
96
Thana
3225
00
08
81
Number :- 66
3227
00
00
20
3226
00
05
69
3222
00
00
20
3221
00
05
51
3220
00
05
81
3219
00
06
66
3217
00
00
37
3181
00
06
29
3182
00
00
20
3180
00
02
92
2895
00
00
78
2894
00
00
20
2893
00
02
86
2892
00
03
58
2889
00
00
20
2900
00
06
97
2899
00
05
03
2898
00
00
20
2890
00
02
11
2901 (ROAD)
00
02
69
3249 (ROAD)
00
01
15
2547
00
68
46
2546
00
00
72
2545
00
01
45
2538
00
04
88
2539
00
03
64
2540
00
03
70
2536
00
00
20
2511
00
00
20
2541
00
01
12
2542
00
00
25
2452
00
00
20
2453
00
00
20
2451
00
06
67
2450
00
05
74
2449
00
01
62
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4483
2465
00
00
20
2446
00
01
78
2447
00
02
30
2448
00
03
97
2363
00
04
51
2362
00
00
20
2364
00
02
24
2365
00
00
20
2418
00
01
85
2419
00
01
72
2420
00
00
20
2422
00
00
20
2423
00
01
37
2424
00
03
47
1565 (ROAD)
00
01
18
1117
00
00
20
1116
00
03
31
1115
00
00
34
1135
00
04
45
1134
00
00
20
1140
00
01
43
1139
00
02
66
1138
00
00
20
1141
00
03
17
1158
00
03
46
1161
00
03
42
1169
00
01
72
1171
00
00
83
1170
00
00
56
1191
00
02
50
1190
00
00
70
1192
00
00
32
1189
00
04
46
1203
00
00
20
1204
00
01
37
1205
00
05
60
1206
00
01
43
1220
00
01
16
1277
00
03
29
1282
00
01
46
1283
00
02
66
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4484
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1295
00
02
51
1296
00
04
04
1302
00
01
46
1303
00
01
80
1308
00
03
10
1309
00
00
98
1310
00
01
18
1273
00
07
06
1311
00
01
67
1312
00
00
20
1317
00
00
20
1324
00
00
20
1323
00
00
20
1325
00
00
77
1326
00
00
40
1327
00
00
71
1342
00
01
10
1341
00
01
31
1340
00
01
24
1328
00
08
39
1339
00
01
22
1336
00
01
24
1335
00
00
79
1331
00
01
63
1329
00
05
77
1330
00
03
01
681
00
07
34
683
00
01
68
680
00
02
95
682
00
14
02
522(ROAD SH-78)
00
04
38
362
00
00
36
368
00
02
42
404
00
00
20
369
00
02
35
371
00
00
82
370
00
01
44
374
00
02
06
375
00
02
30
376
00
00
73
377
00
00
94
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4485
378
00
02
21
379
00
02
44
380
00
02
50
381
00
02
00
382
00
01
68
384
00
01
82
394
00
00
20
395
00
05
96
397
00
03
31
398
00
01
33
399
00
02
23
396
00
05
22
Parkhotimpur Painathi
1083
00
03
14
Thana number :- 68
1082
00
02
00
1081
00
04
10
1084
00
10
40
1080
00
09
68
1135
00
01
15
1134
00
06
74
1140
00
00
20
1141
00
07
45
1142
00
00
20
1146
00
04
36
1148
00
02
44
1147
00
09
65
1172
00
01
45
1171 (CART TRACK)
00
01
48
1145
00
00
20
1208
00
02
76
1209
00
11
15
1210
00
00
20
1211
00
00
20
1201
00
00
20
1202
00
00
20
1203
00
00
20
1205
00
04
72
1204
00
03
49
1196
00
03
12
1197
00
00
25
1195
00
02
35
1194
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4486
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1193
00
07
67
1191
00
02
63
1187 (CART TRACK)
00
00
95
961
00
00
20
962
00
09
42
963
00
02
75
960
00
00
20
959
00
00
20
964
00
02
27
965
00
04
02
957
00
00
20
958
00
00
20
956
00
00
29
941
00
06
23
955
00
00
65
954
00
01
09
944
00
02
36
945
00
02
58
953
00
01
44
952
00
02
66
951
00
01
90
950
00
03
31
1256
00
00
50
927
00
04
98
929
00
00
20
928
00
02
94
926
00
00
48
925
00
00
20
923
00
05
29
922
00
00
91
907(NALA)
00
02
08
906 (NALA)
00
01
24
905 (NALA)
00
01
18
619 (NALA)
00
01
12
614
00
02
42
615
00
02
89
616
00
07
68
617
00
00
86
618
00
00
20
610
00
00
42
622
00
04
82
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4487
624
00
01
34
623
00
01
96
625
00
01
93
626
00
01
80
627
00
02
66
628
00
06
37
629
00
02
23
630
00
00
20
619 (CART TRACK)
00
01
22
619 (CART TRACK)
00
01
96
680
00
00
20
679
00
00
90
678
00
06
65
906 (Cart Track)
00
01
24
645
00
00
20
661
00
01
94
671
00
03
89
673
00
00
20
670
00
00
20
672
00
05
83
667
00
07
03
666
00
00
20
125 (ROAD)
00
03
24
107
00
00
20
109
00
03
79
110
00
09
32
112
00
04
66
113
00
00
94
111
00
02
53
115
00
09
20
118
00
00
62
117
00
08
38
116
00
09
68
10
00
00
25
11
00
01
26
18
00
03
13
19
00
00
20
17
00
01
76
12
00
02
84
16
00
00
90
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4488
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
15
00
00
20
14
00
00
20
13
00
07
50
31 (NALA)
00
01
04
32
00
01
12
44
00
00
25
47
00
04
25
48
00
04
86
49
00
04
68
46
00
01
14
50
00
07
42
9 (CART TRACK)
00
04
27
51 (ROAD)
00
01
15
52 (ROAD)
00
01
32
53 (ROAD)
00
01
20
1 (ROAD)
00
00
20
2
00
00
20
KUTALPUR Thana number :- 56
2719(Road)
00
00
82
1196
00
00
20
1197
00
17
47
2726
00
05
20
1193
00
01
69
1200 (Road)
00
01
39
1225
00
01
33
1226
00
19
37
2725
00
00
20
1240
00
08
30
1239
00
11
53
1242
00
03
34
1243
00
03
12
1078
00
00
20
1082
00
05
40
1081
00
10
73
1080
00
05
65
1065
00
00
20
1064
00
05
66
1063
00
03
65
927
00
02
76
928
00
09
13
929
00
07
52
931
00
05
40
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4489
918
00
00
20
917
00
05
29
916
00
05
92
915
00
00
20
705
00
00
40
706
00
08
72
707
00
01
45
708
00
00
20
711
00
00
20
907
00
00
90
906
00
01
94
905
00
03
32
902
00
01
30
904
00
01
10
903
00
04
96
898
00
00
20
897
00
00
32
896
00
03
07
895
00
05
15
894
00
00
20
761
00
02
39
760
00
00
20
762
00
03
00
765
00
01
74
763
00
00
82
764
00
02
58
766
00
06
04
767
00
03
67
768
00
00
20
750
00
00
20
749
00
01
66
771
00
11
77
772
00
00
76
776
00
00
20
747
00
02
89
745
00
10
27
746
00
00
64
744
00
00
20
743
00
04
36
742
00
02
06
741
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4490
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
788
00
08
69
789
00
00
20
552
00
00
97
553
00
04
43
554
00
03
16
555
00
04
16
531
00
01
44
530
00
00
25
511 / 2716
00
07
65
529
00
00
20
528
00
01
33
511
00
09
80
513
00
00
20
512
00
03
06
509
00
00
20
508
00
08
94
507
00
05
56
515
00
00
20
MUNSEPUR
938
00
00
65
Thana Number :- 19
939
00
00
20
936
00
07
18
935
00
03
55
934
00
01
49
933
00
00
22
922(Nala)
00
00
91
952
00
00
78
953
00
03
50
954
00
00
20
955
00
06
48
956
00
03
34
957
00
09
30
965
00
00
20
966
00
04
72
967
00
00
20
964
00
02
29
963
00
00
25
968
00
02
68
969
00
02
70
970
00
03
49
971
00
03
53
972
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4491
973
00
03
89
974
00
00
20
851
00
02
69
850
00
07
70
849
00
00
20
848
00
00
31
849
00
00
20
847
00
05
34
846
00
02
53
844
00
00
20
749
00
01
69
800
00
03
70
801
00
04
32
799
00
00
20
798
00
02
58
802
00
00
55
803
00
00
20
776
00
01
60
797
00
03
61
795
00
01
51
796
00
00
20
777
00
10
07
793
00
01
52
792
00
01
68
791
00
05
52
790
00
00
90
789
00
00
20
788
00
08
51
787
00
06
71
786
00
00
20
532
00
00
32
534
00
09
26
535
00
03
29
536
00
03
10
539
00
01
07
547
00
01
82
540
00
00
20
546
00
05
68
545
00
02
05
544
00
02
36
543
00
01
45
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4492
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
521
00
03
18
520
00
03
40
519
00
00
98
518
00
00
20
552(Nala)
00
01
36
557
00
00
20
559
00
02
94
560
00
04
76
561
00
05
87
562
00
04
38
563
00
03
64
564
00
01
31
572
00
01
34
569
00
08
24
568
00
06
36
202
00
01
12
201
00
11
71
1165
00
05
53
1164
00
03
84
8
00
07
03
7
00
06
41
NARAINPUR
408 (Road)
00
02
44
Thana Number :- 20
292
00
04
99
291
00
11
43
290
00
16
71
289
00
04
40
301
00
00
91
302
00
10
58
284
00
00
20
283
00
01
17
282
00
03
29
281
00
01
99
280
00
02
33
279
00
00
20
303
00
00
90
176
00
19
64
177
00
02
52
178
00
00
20
175
00
01
78
174
00
00
20
179
00
26
31
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4493
187
00
01
59
184
00
08
49
185
00
08
16
75
00
02
27
183
00
01
37
76
00
12
94
98
00
13
16
97
00
08
78
96
00
01
99
95
00
00
20
102
00
12
05
103
00
02
78
16
00
00
20
20
00
13
70
21
00
05
33
22
00
00
20
25
00
00
20
19
00
05
36
18
00
02
32
17
00
00
20
26
00
11
12
4
00
07
98
34
00
01
33
ANANDPUR
2657
00
09
71
Thana Number :- 36
2656
00
07
61
2655
00
00
20
372
00
15
28
374 (Road)
00
03
52
366
00
03
00
367
00
05
86
359/3598
00
04
70
359
00
07
63
356
00
07
10
202
00
03
32
203
00
15
54
200
00
04
00
204
00
24
37
192
00
07
03
133
00
06
61
135
00
11
51
136
00
12
71
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4494
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
124
00
09
54
120
00
15
62
117
00
13
00
118
00
04
20
112
00
09
91
111
00
00
20
110
00
11
69
109
00
19
97
108
00
01
66
71
00
01
26
MADHOPUR
869
00
07
21
Thana Number :- 21
870
00
07
51
871
00
06
71
872
00
03
78
873
00
03
31
874
00
20
14
889
00
06
65
890
00
00
20
878
00
00
20
884
00
14
14
881
00
00
20
885
00
00
20
883
00
07
30
882
00
07
46
886
00
00
20
880
00
00
20
1098 / 1414 (Nala)
00
03
50
636
00
04
66
637
00
03
43
638
00
02
05
639
00
00
20
640
00
08
41
641
00
00
20
632
00
04
98
653
00
00
61
654
00
01
64
631
00
13
40
666
00
08
05
665
00
05
46
664
00
00
20
667
00
01
91
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4495
670
00
03
97
671
00
00
20
668
00
00
20
669
00
01
94
672
00
00
92
606
00
00
20
605
00
02
53
604
00
07
27
603
00
05
65
602
00
05
94
585
00
00
71
601
00
00
34
591
00
02
95
592
00
02
28
593
00
00
55
590
00
05
72
562 (Road)
00
01
81
540
00
11
46
561
00
00
20
560
00
12
01
559
00
09
20
715
00
05
26
169
00
05
40
170
00
03
37
173
00
02
14
172
00
08
54
179
00
00
25
180
00
00
20
178
00
00
47
63
00
05
75
64
00
00
36
62 / 1422
00
08
65
61
00
01
07
62
00
00
20
66
00
00
20
67
00
09
89
60
00
01
24
58
00
00
20
68
00
00
20
59
00
05
93
53
00
01
37
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4496
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
50
00
37
06
MANER
341
00
00
56
Thana Number :-7
334
00
03
63
333
00
05
41
332
00
08
25
225
00
09
95
226
00
05
24
245
00
04
57
255
00
04
00
250
00
00
20
254
00
01
41
258
00
00
73
257
00
00
20
261
00
00
20
259
00
02
37
260
00
04
19
263
00
03
12
264
00
02
68
266
00
02
60
267
00
02
19
268
00
00
36
269
00
00
20
270
00
00
20
203
00
09
85
204
00
11
10
207
00
02
07
205
00
03
03
193
00
00
20
206
00
07
44
191
00
02
03
190
00
05
52
104
00
04
36
189
00
05
30
188
00
07
16
185
00
12
58
184
00
06
89
180
00
05
21
181
00
00
20
179
00
05
26
178
00
01
41
168
00
00
20
176
00
04
55
175
00
01
55
171
00
04
08
173
00
01
82
174
00
00
20
172
00
00
82
[F. No. R-25011/16/2013-OR-I]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
ubZ fnYyh] 5 vxLr] 2013
dk-vk- 1629-—dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slk izrhr gksrk gS fd yksd fgr esa ;g vko”;d gS fd iVuk ls eksfrgkjh vkSj csrkyiqj
rd isVªksfy;e inkFkksZ ds ifjogu gsrq ftyk iVuk] jkT; fcgkj esa bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs”ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkuh
pkfg, A
vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slh ikbiykbu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, vko”;d izrhr gksrk gS fd ml Hkwfe esa ftlds Hkhrj
mDr ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkus dk izLrko gS vkSj tks bl vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa of.kZr gS] mi;ksx dk vtZu fd;k tk,(
vr% vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbUl ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½ vf/kfu;e] 1962 ¼1962
dk 50½ dh /kkjk 3 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk iznÙk “kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] mDr Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/akdkj dk vtZu djus ds
vius vk”k; dh ?kks’k.kk djrh gSA
dksbZ O;fDr] tks mDr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa fgrc) gS] ml rkjh[k ls ftldks] Hkkjr ds jkti= esa ;Fkk
izdkf”kr bl vf/klwpuk dh izfr;ka lk/kkj.k turk dks miyC/k djk nh tkrh gS] bDdhl fnu ds vUnj] Hkwfe ds Hkhrj ikbiykbu
fcNk, tkus gsrq mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj ds vtZu ds fy,] Jh v:.k dqekj >k] fc-iz-ls- o l{ke izkf/kdkjh bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs”ku
fyfeVsM] ¼ikbiykbu fMohtu½ iVuk] iks-vks- <syok] flikjk] ftyk iVuk] fiu% 800020] fcgkj dks fyf[kr :i eas vk{ksi Hkst ldsxkA
vuqlwph
ftyk % iVuk
jkT; % fcgkj
ekStk@xzke
losZ@Cykd@la- (IyksV la-)
lc&Mho&la-
{ks=kiQy
gsDVs;j
vkjs
oxZ ehVj
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
jkeckn
1639
00
00
88
Fkkuk uacj&7@110
1640
00
01
64
1641
00
04
12
1642
00
04
02
1643
00
03
46
1644
00
00
20
1671
00
04
57
1670
00
10
49
1675
00
00
20
1669
00
03
41
1676
00
03
79
1677
00
02
52
1679
00
00
20
1678
00
02
42
1688
00
03
05
1683
00
00
73
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4497
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4498
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1682
00
00
20
1684
00
02
61
1685
00
00
27
1687
00
01
36
1686
00
00
72
1697
00
01
14
1698
00
02
03
1699
00
06
15
1700
00
00
20
1702
00
03
47
1854
00
00
20
1855
00
00
20
1703
00
02
16
1706
00
01
13
1707
00
01
05
1856
00
00
48
1857
00
02
36
1710
00
00
20
1858
00
02
87
1859
00
03
93
1860
00
03
16
1836
00
00
20
1876
00
01
86
1861
00
02
18
1877
00
00
20
1862
00
02
74
1837
00
06
06
1625
00
00
20
1863
00
00
20
1864
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4499
1838
00
01
77
1839
00
00
20
1622
00
00
63
1621
00
02
44
1840
00
00
20
1620
00
05
63
1619
00
03
45
1618
00
01
86
1617
00
03
06
1616
00
02
31
1615
00
01
59
1614
00
01
34
1611
00
01
66
1609
00
03
15
1607
00
08
13
1603
00
03
60
1600
00
04
56
1598
00
00
74
1555
00
00
20
1555@1906
00
26
08
1584
00
00
32
1585
00
00
20
1583
00
02
54
1582
00
01
81
1581
00
02
41
1580
00
02
34
1579
00
02
59
1578
00
10
34
1577
00
08
12
1569
00
05
19
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4500
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1570
00
03
91
1568 ¼jkLrk½
00
01
00
1437
00
01
37
1438
00
01
65
1439
00
01
52
1440
00
01
92
1441
00
01
68
1442
00
02
20
1443
00
01
67
1444
00
01
21
1425
00
05
27
1424
00
02
52
1423
00
02
17
1422
00
02
12
1420@1910
00
02
45
1421
00
01
03
1420
00
01
29
1419
00
01
46
1418
00
00
20
1417
00
01
89
1416
00
01
11
1415
00
01
57
1414
00
02
17
1406
00
02
04
1405
00
01
46
1404
00
02
73
1403
00
02
31
1402
00
04
08
1398
00
02
65
1397
00
09
45
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4501
1396
00
00
28
jkeiqj nhvjk rkSQhj
246
00
03
96
Fkkuk uacj&7@109
245
00
02
17
244
00
02
00
243
00
07
80
242
00
05
32
241
00
03
02
240
00
02
30
239
00
00
68
238
00
00
20
jkeiqj nhvjk
924
00
00
67
Fkkuk uacj&07@108
923
00
05
64
922
00
02
42
921
00
03
56
920
00
02
26
919
00
00
20
917
00
07
00
911
00
02
90
917@944
00
02
38
910
00
07
31
905
00
05
45
904
00
06
20
903
00
04
37
902
00
00
20
901
00
01
78
899
00
00
86
900
00
01
10
898
00
03
83
897
00
10
03
890
00
01
48
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4502
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
889
00
02
02
888
00
07
72
887
00
07
78
866
00
00
20
868
00
01
81
869
00
01
60
870
00
01
69
828
00
02
75
827
00
02
38
826
00
03
37
825
00
01
99
824
00
02
52
823
00
01
70
822
00
02
30
818
00
06
85
820
00
00
20
819
00
00
20
817
00
07
54
816
00
07
14
775
00
00
20
774
00
00
20
776
00
00
20
777
00
00
42
778
00
00
54
779
00
00
94
780
00
01
09
781
00
04
01
783
00
00
20
782
00
05
14
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4503
dhVk pkSgÙkj
6209
00
01
04
Fkkuk uacj&6
6208
00
00
20
6213
00
03
16
6207
00
00
74
6215
00
03
96
6206
00
00
20
6205
00
03
83
6204
00
03
17
6203
00
01
27
6202
00
00
34
6199
00
02
36
6198
00
01
92
6197
00
01
36
6196
00
01
13
6193
00
01
58
6192
00
02
72
6191
00
01
37
6187
00
13
90
6181
00
05
47
6175
00
02
17
6176
00
00
20
6174
00
01
69
6173
00
03
43
6170
00
02
33
6169
00
02
34
6168
00
02
59
6141
00
00
20
6140
00
00
20
6142
00
12
97
6143
00
18
76
6119
00
08
66
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4504
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
6118
00
13
69
6111@6885
00
33
58
6094
00
00
56
2202
00
38
69
1287
00
07
94
1288
00
12
62
1289
00
10
16
1298
00
00
20
1297
00
00
32
1290
00
00
20
1296
00
31
80
1334
00
21
06
1360
00
15
88
1361
00
06
72
1362
00
11
12
1363
00
04
84
1364
00
05
45
760
00
02
22
761
00
01
43
762
00
01
16
763
00
02
05
764
00
02
33
765
00
01
61
766
00
08
44
767
00
02
80
768
00
03
01
769
00
02
53
770
00
02
33
771
00
02
63
772
00
03
02
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4505
773
00
01
45
774
00
01
45
775
00
01
32
776
00
01
66
777
00
01
69
778
00
01
56
783
00
08
51
784
00
20
57
663
00
14
22
664
00
05
98
666
00
04
32
666@6944
00
02
09
667
00
05
68
668
00
24
97
714
00
05
57
713
00
15
42
712
00
15
38
683
00
02
22
684
00
12
65
685
00
06
19
686
00
05
56
687
00
19
15
688@7043
00
41
81
688@7027
00
00
29
688@7026
00
04
87
688@7025
00
08
30
688@7024
00
13
15
688@7023
00
04
74
82
00
40
30
81
00
11
82
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4506
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
80
00
17
52
79
00
13
19
78
00
07
33
77
00
07
86
76
00
07
30
75
00
04
22
67
00
00
20
74
00
04
55
73
00
10
19
72
00
08
48
74@6901
00
54
53
1@7102
00
15
58
1@7103
00
40
21
1@7119
00
04
81
1@7106
00
00
20
1@7105
00
62
45
¹iQk- la- vkj&25011@16@2013&vksvkj&Iº
iou oqQekj] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 5th August, 2013
S.O. 1629.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest
that a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited in Dist. Patna in the State of Bihar for ‘Patna
to Motihari and Baitalpur Pipeline’ for the transportation of Petroleum Product;
And, whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is
necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which
is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and
Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby
declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the
date on which the copies of the notification issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as
published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of
the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land, to Shri Arun Kumar Jha B.A.S. &
Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited. (Pipelines Division) P.O. Dhelwan, Sipara, Dist.
Patna (Bihar.) Pin–800020.
SCHEDULE
Dist.: Patna
State : Bihar
Mouja / Village
Survey/Block No.
Sub-Div-No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
RAMBAD
1639
00
00
88
Thana Number 7/110
1640
00
01
64
1641
00
04
12
1642
00
04
02
1643
00
03
46
1644
00
00
20
1671
00
04
57
1670
00
10
49
1675
00
00
20
1669
00
03
41
1676
00
03
79
1677
00
02
52
1679
00
00
20
1678
00
02
42
1688
00
03
05
1683
00
00
73
1682
00
00
20
1684
00
02
61
1685
00
00
27
1687
00
01
36
1686
00
00
72
1697
00
01
14
1698
00
02
03
1699
00
06
15
1700
00
00
20
1702
00
03
47
1854
00
00
20
1855
00
00
20
1703
00
02
16
1706
00
01
13
1707
00
01
05
1856
00
00
48
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4507
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4508
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1857
00
02
36
1710
00
00
20
1858
00
02
87
1859
00
03
93
1860
00
03
16
1836
00
00
20
1876
00
01
86
1861
00
02
18
1877
00
00
20
1862
00
02
74
1837
00
06
06
1625
00
00
20
1863
00
00
20
1864
00
00
20
1838
00
01
77
1839
00
00
20
1622
00
00
63
1621
00
02
44
1840
00
00
20
1620
00
05
63
1619
00
03
45
1618
00
01
86
1617
00
03
06
1616
00
02
31
1615
00
01
59
1614
00
01
34
1611
00
01
66
1609
00
03
15
1607
00
08
13
1603
00
03
60
1600
00
04
56
1598
00
00
74
1555
00
00
20
1555/1906
00
26
08
1584
00
00
32
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4509
1585
00
00
20
1583
00
02
54
1582
00
01
81
1581
00
02
41
1580
00
02
34
1579
00
02
59
1578
00
10
34
1577
00
08
12
1569
00
05
19
1570
00
03
91
1568 (Road)
00
01
00
1437
00
01
37
1438
00
01
65
1439
00
01
52
1440
00
01
92
1441
00
01
68
1442
00
02
20
1443
00
01
67
1444
00
01
21
1425
00
05
27
1424
00
02
52
1423
00
02
17
1422
00
02
12
1420/1910
00
02
45
1421
00
01
03
1420
00
01
29
1419
00
01
46
1418
00
00
20
1417
00
01
89
1416
00
01
11
1415
00
01
57
1414
00
02
17
1406
00
02
04
1405
00
01
46
1404
00
02
73
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4510
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1403
00
02
31
1402
00
04
08
1398
00
02
65
1397
00
09
45
1396
00
00
28
RAMPUR DIARA TAUFIR
246
00
03
96
Thana Number :- 7/109
245
00
02
17
244
00
02
00
243
00
07
80
242
00
05
32
241
00
03
02
240
00
02
30
239
00
00
68
238
00
00
20
RAMPUR DIARA
924
00
00
67
Thana Number :-07/108
923
00
05
64
922
00
02
42
921
00
03
56
920
00
02
26
919
00
00
20
917
00
07
00
911
00
02
90
917 / 944
00
02
38
910
00
07
31
905
00
05
45
904
00
06
20
903
00
04
37
902
00
00
20
901
00
01
78
899
00
00
86
900
00
01
10
898
00
03
83
897
00
10
03
890
00
01
48
889
00
02
02
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4511
888
00
07
72
887
00
07
78
866
00
00
20
868
00
01
81
869
00
01
60
870
00
01
69
828
00
02
75
827
00
02
38
826
00
03
37
825
00
01
99
824
00
02
52
823
00
01
70
822
00
02
30
818
00
06
85
820
00
00
20
819
00
00
20
817
00
07
54
816
00
07
14
775
00
00
20
774
00
00
20
776
00
00
20
777
00
00
42
778
00
00
54
779
00
00
94
780
00
01
09
781
00
04
01
783
00
00
20
782
00
05
14
KITA CHAUHATTAR
6209
00
01
04
Thana Number :- 6
6208
00
00
20
6213
00
03
16
6207
00
00
74
6215
00
03
96
6206
00
00
20
6205
00
03
83
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4512
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
6204
00
03
17
6203
00
01
27
6202
00
00
34
6199
00
02
36
6198
00
01
92
6197
00
01
36
6196
00
01
13
6193
00
01
58
6192
00
02
72
6191
00
01
37
6187
00
13
90
6181
00
05
47
6175
00
02
17
6176
00
00
20
6174
00
01
69
6173
00
03
43
6170
00
02
33
6169
00
02
34
6168
00
02
59
6141
00
00
20
6140
00
00
20
6142
00
12
97
6143
00
18
76
6119
00
08
66
6118
00
13
69
6111/6885
00
33
58
6094
00
00
56
2202
00
38
69
1287
00
07
94
1288
00
12
62
1289
00
10
16
1298
00
00
20
1297
00
00
32
1290
00
00
20
1296
00
31
80
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4513
1334
00
21
06
1360
00
15
88
1361
00
06
72
1362
00
11
12
1363
00
04
84
1364
00
05
45
760
00
02
22
761
00
01
43
762
00
01
16
763
00
02
05
764
00
02
33
765
00
01
61
766
00
08
44
767
00
02
80
768
00
03
01
769
00
02
53
770
00
02
33
771
00
02
63
772
00
03
02
773
00
01
45
774
00
01
45
775
00
01
32
776
00
01
66
777
00
01
69
778
00
01
56
783
00
08
51
784
00
20
57
663
00
14
22
664
00
05
98
666
00
04
32
666/6944
00
02
09
667
00
05
68
668
00
24
97
714
00
05
57
713
00
15
42
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4514
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
712
00
15
38
683
00
02
22
684
00
12
65
685
00
06
19
686
00
05
56
687
00
19
15
688 / 7043
00
41
81
688 / 7027
00
00
29
688 / 7026
00
04
87
688 / 7025
00
08
30
688 / 7024
00
13
15
688 / 7023
00
04
74
82
00
40
30
81
00
11
82
80
00
17
52
79
00
13
19
78
00
07
33
77
00
07
86
76
00
07
30
75
00
04
22
67
00
00
20
74
00
04
55
73
00
10
19
72
00
08
48
74 / 6901
00
54
53
1 / 7102
00
15
58
1 / 7103
00
40
21
1 / 7119
00
04
81
1 / 7106
00
00
20
1 / 7105
00
62
45
[F. No. R-25011/16/2013-OR-I]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
ubZ fnYyh] 5 vxLr] 2013
dk-vk-
1630-—dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slk izrhr gksrk gS fd yksd fgr esa ;g vko”;d gS fd iVuk ls eksfrgkjh vkSj csrkyiqj
rd isVªksfy;e inkFkks± ds ifjogu gsrq ftyk iwoZ paikju] jkT; fcgkj esa bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs”ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkuh
pkfg, A
vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slh ikbiykbu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, vko”;d izrhr gksrk gS fd ml Hkwfe esa ftlds Hkhrj
mDr ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkus dk izLrko gS vkSj tks bl vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa of.kZr gS] mi;ksx dk vtZu fd;k tk,(
vr% vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] iSVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbUl ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½ vf/kfu;e] 1962 ¼1962
dk 50½ dh /kkjk 3 dh mi&/kkjk¼1½ }kjk iznÙk “kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] mDr Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/akdkj dk vtZu djus ds vius
vk”k; dh ?kks’k.kk djrh gSA
dksbZ O;fDr] tks mDr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa fgrc) gS] ml rkjh[k ls ftldks] Hkkjr ds jkti= esa ;Fkk izdkf”kr bl
vfèklwpuk dh izfr;ka lk/kkj.k turk dks miyC/k djk nh tkrh gS] bDdhl fnu ds vUnj] Hkwfe ds Hkhrj ikbiykbu fcNk, tkus gsrq
mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj ds vtZu ds fy,] Jh v:.k dqekj >k] fc-iz-ls- o l{ke izkf/kdkjh bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs”ku fyfeVsM] ¼ikbiykbu
fMohtu½ iVuk] iks-vks- <syok] flikjk] ftyk iVuk] fiu% 800020] fcgkj dks fyf[kr :i eas vk{ksi Hkst ldsxkA
vuqlwph
ftyk % iwoZ paikju
jkT; % fcgkj
ekStk@xzke
losZ@Cykd@la- (IyksV la-)
lc&Mho&la-
{ks=kiQy
gsDVs;j
vkjs
oxZ ehVj
1
2
3
4
5
6
nkeks chjrh
1169
00
15
34
Fkkuk uacj&177
1172
00
00
20
1168
00
01
43
1167
00
06
15
1166
00
00
81
1164
00
00
92
1163
00
11
73
1161
00
00
20
1162
00
14
54
1159
00
01
85
1058 jkLrk
00
04
77
652
00
00
20
648
00
12
32
645
00
10
91
646
00
06
70
643
00
03
43
642
00
03
35
647
00
00
20
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4515
1
2
3
4
5
6
4516
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
641
00
04
28
611
00
06
26
613
00
00
45
612
00
09
40
609
00
05
28
445
00
11
73
444
00
00
20
446
00
02
87
455
00
10
65
447
00
00
20
454
00
10
17
461
00
00
20
462
00
06
26
460
00
00
20
463
00
07
64
466
00
07
07
465
00
03
46
467
00
03
83
468
00
00
20
469
00
02
09
471
00
01
83
479
00
25
53
491
00
00
20
482
00
00
20
478
00
00
20
480
00
12
79
516
00
00
20
481
00
00
20
524
00
02
29
518
00
04
82
520
00
04
54
521
00
00
20
522
00
00
20
519
00
15
02
514
00
00
20
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4517
1
2
3
4
5
6
517
00
00
20
512
00
01
96
uokMk
1942
00
04
14
Fkkuk uacj&180
1943
00
00
69
1944
00
00
20
1941
00
07
70
1938
00
01
00
1939
00
00
20
1936
00
03
04
1937
00
12
37
1931
00
00
20
1930
00
02
73
1880
00
00
20
1881
00
18
15
1879
00
02
63
1876
00
06
64
1882
00
06
02
1874
00
04
19
1873
00
00
20
1884
00
01
51
1885
00
09
91
1886
00
00
20
1889
00
03
78
1887
00
00
26
1888
00
03
28
1890
00
00
20
1784
00
06
97
1785
00
05
29
1786
00
00
20
1783
00
00
20
1781
00
04
46
1782
00
05
19
1678
00
00
20
1679
00
06
29
1680
00
00
92
1
2
3
4
5
6
4518
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1681
00
06
17
1683
00
00
20
1684
00
00
20
1683@2060
00
01
47
1682
00
03
30
1698
00
06
60
1699
00
00
73
1697
00
01
23
1711
00
02
82
1709
00
00
20
1710
00
08
10
1712
00
00
65
1715@2062
00
08
03
1714
00
00
85
1715
00
08
55
1521
00
00
20
1519
00
00
20
1520
00
05
87
1716
00
00
20
1487
00
10
17
1486
00
04
62
1489
00
05
41
1495
00
03
13
1491
00
00
20
1490
00
00
20
1494
00
01
68
1496
00
07
70
1510
00
00
20
1497
00
01
23
1509
00
06
69
1502
00
09
66
1475
00
00
20
1503
00
06
56
1474
00
03
50
1471
00
00
20
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4519
1
2
3
4
5
6
1472@2052
00
00
20
1473
00
07
46
1553
00
00
20
1472
00
03
15
1427
00
07
08
1428
00
08
11
1429
00
03
62
1430
00
00
20
1425
00
00
20
1424
00
04
36
1423
00
06
13
1422
00
00
54
1407
00
06
50
1412
00
00
20
1411
00
02
36
1410
00
15
27
1415
00
01
11
1133 jkLrk
00
15
36
1130
00
00
20
1131
00
01
98
1129
00
00
20
1132
00
14
27
222
00
07
85
221
00
00
20
223
00
02
06
224
00
00
48
220
00
13
98
219
00
00
20
218
00
00
70
oksYgk
1051
00
00
20
Fkkuk uacj&165
1052
00
03
65
1038
00
12
81
1039
00
08
08
1040
00
08
83
1041
00
00
20
1
2
3
4
5
6
4520
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
felhj Vksyk
496
00
00
39
Fkkuk uacj&163
493
00
10
16
502
00
06
21
503
00
09
20
505
00
01
04
504
00
00
83
364
00
00
20
479
00
10
26
480
00
00
90
478
00
08
34
477
00
06
18
365
00
02
39
386
00
04
38
389
00
00
20
387
00
05
22
388
00
02
53
384
00
05
37
370
00
00
20
385
00
00
20
383
00
06
83
382
00
00
20
378
00
10
10
379
00
02
30
377
00
00
84
330 jkLrk
00
01
80
329 jkLrk
00
03
31
310 jkLrk
00
02
21
317
00
00
20
318
00
11
94
301 dsuky
00
01
68
300
00
04
21
299
00
07
04
248
00
12
11
247
00
01
32
249
00
08
04
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4521
1
2
3
4
5
6
246
00
04
37
283 jkLrk
00
02
71
266
00
09
21
267
00
02
98
267@499
00
01
80
263
00
00
20
262
00
00
20
264
00
16
56
255
00
00
20
260
00
02
29
257
00
06
30
258
00
03
11
129
00
14
21
131
00
01
25
152
00
11
49
151
00
02
51
150
00
06
71
140
00
05
98
139
00
00
67
138
00
00
20
141
00
12
13
142
00
00
20
93
00
11
71
92 jkLrk
00
02
07
143
00
00
88
90
00
14
40
91
00
00
20
89
00
17
17
88
00
00
20
85
00
00
65
86
00
20
49
87
00
00
20
2
00
36
63
28
00
04
16
27
00
21
22
1
2
3
4
5
6
4522
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
26
00
01
71
25
00
00
20
21
00
00
46
1 ukyk
00
02
61
511 ukyk
00
01
75
vghj xuok
402
00
03
95
Fkkuk uacj&162
401
00
09
60
400 jkLrk
00
04
55
399
00
06
52
398
00
14
48
396
00
11
33
44
00
14
56
46
00
16
28
51
00
06
38
36
00
52
21
17
00
09
76
16
00
13
18
15
00
11
16
jkeiqjok
246
00
12
46
Fkkuk uacj&160
261
00
19
27
262
00
05
95
260
00
12
32
263
00
00
20
282
00
06
48
265
00
11
66
281
00
02
37
279
00
02
57
280
00
20
24
277
00
00
20
294
00
22
88
295
00
00
20
296
00
02
14
297
00
27
58
328
00
00
20
336 jkLrk
00
06
58
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4523
1
2
3
4
5
6
337
00
02
51
7
00
20
77
6
00
00
20
9
00
07
48
8
00
05
49
10
00
01
95
11
00
00
20
12 ukyk
00
04
05
xk; ?kkV
213 es[kok unh
00
06
55
Fkkuk uacj&153
214 es[kok unh
00
07
24
215 es[kok unh
00
02
12
216
00
10
01
217
00
00
20
208
00
08
25
220
00
13
38
221
00
15
24
230
01
12
26
144 LVsV gkbos 4
00
03
19
265
00
00
20
262
00
02
59
143 dPpk jkLrk
00
02
26
128
00
32
56
139
00
05
21
112
00
11
08
142
00
53
19
97
00
00
34
96
00
03
34
93
00
05
36
91
00
10
84
89
00
00
20
87
00
00
20
88
00
10
54
85
00
07
43
86
00
00
20
84
00
10
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
4524
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
83
00
00
59
81
00
07
94
82
00
00
66
yksfg;kj mtSu
267 jkLrk
00
04
28
Fkkuk uacj&133
jkLrk
00
04
02
2745
00
08
06
2746
00
02
60
2747
00
13
55
2748
00
03
11
2753
00
01
12
2752
00
03
15
2761
00
19
63
2762
00
00
20
2764
00
05
73
2760
00
00
57
2759
00
02
82
2682 jkLrk
00
01
89
2765
00
10
36
2768
00
08
97
2785
00
18
02
2767
00
06
73
2787
00
01
06
2786 jkLrk
00
00
26
2678
00
06
73
2676
00
30
79
2677
00
02
63
2675
00
00
26
2654
00
14
50
2650
00
07
94
2656
00
06
23
2655
00
04
73
2644
00
13
91
2646
00
09
72
2647
00
19
08
2611
00
21
85
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4525
1
2
3
4
5
6
2607
00
04
76
2606
00
00
96
2605
00
09
84
2597
00
06
05
2598
00
00
20
2595
00
11
61
2596
00
10
15
2589
00
19
22
2588
00
00
20
2573
00
12
93
2572
00
17
21
3010
00
07
91
2574
00
01
53
2570
00
03
24
2568
00
07
83
2563
00
04
67
2564
00
00
20
2566
00
14
29
2567
00
00
52
2553
00
51
55
2554
00
10
34
1764
00
00
20
1765
00
00
66
1727
00
00
20
1762
00
18
84
1729
00
05
87
1730
00
07
46
1725
00
21
27
1724
00
02
66
1721
00
34
09
1622 jkLrk
00
03
38
1709
00
00
20
1708
00
00
20
1623 ukyk
00
06
73
1545
00
39
54
1
2
3
4
5
6
4526
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1544
00
00
20
1543
00
07
15
1546
00
05
74
1542
00
25
78
1541
00
08
91
1540
00
00
20
1522 ¼³/kukmrh unh½
00
12
17
t;flagiqj
4291
00
07
14
Fkkuk uacj&85
4292
00
04
23
4289
00
03
96
4250 jkLrk
00
03
82
4286
00
08
30
4283
00
03
82
4284
00
01
42
4282
00
07
15
4272
00
04
34
4281
00
11
64
4280
00
12
95
4278
00
09
30
4277
00
07
58
4298
00
09
37
4305
00
00
20
4299
00
10
61
4300
00
02
15
4301
00
00
20
4538 dPpk jkLrk
00
28
10
4541
00
03
05
4540
00
01
15
4539
00
00
20
4537
00
06
41
4536
00
02
67
4502 jkLrk
00
03
60
4464
00
17
45
4489
00
08
20
4490
00
00
20
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4527
1
2
3
4
5
6
4488
00
13
68
4467
00
00
20
4483
00
05
05
4480
00
03
68
4482
00
00
97
4472
00
00
20
4481
00
02
15
4473
00
05
60
4437
00
01
77
4474
00
12
22
4477
00
15
42
4418
00
00
20
4505
00
00
20
4475
00
00
20
4476
00
00
20
4436
00
00
20
4435
00
15
08
4427
00
26
87
4425
00
04
20
4426
00
09
60
4424
00
13
77
4445
00
00
40
4381
00
20
75
4392
00
00
20
4391
00
00
45
4382
00
00
62
4383
00
00
20
4390
00
13
64
4389@6841
00
01
89
4389
00
10
57
4388
00
00
75
4013 jkLrk
00
04
97
4015
00
22
21
4020
00
00
20
4019
00
19
67
1
2
3
4
5
6
4528
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
4021
00
00
68
4022
00
22
69
4023
00
11
77
3968
00
00
39
3964 jkLrk
00
05
71
2744
00
07
10
2743
00
00
32
2745
00
17
66
2747
00
27
00
2746
00
00
20
2739
00
00
20
2748
00
17
63
2749
00
00
20
2727
00
03
30
2738
00
00
94
2728
00
04
11
2729
00
09
09
2731
00
09
73
2732
00
07
41
2730
00
05
17
2532 jkLrk
00
04
69
2523
00
11
42
2524
00
08
74
2525
00
06
33
2526
00
02
11
2501
00
01
28
2502
00
00
20
2500
00
09
14
2499
00
05
57
2498
00
08
50
2432
00
15
71
2433
00
00
20
2449
00
07
09
2431
00
14
01
2450
00
06
74
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4529
1
2
3
4
5
6
2451
00
08
71
2454
00
00
20
2453
00
00
20
2430
00
00
66
2387
00
31
89
2461@6829
00
04
99
2462
00
00
20
2463
00
00
80
2386
00
01
63
2368 jkLrk
00
05
71
2385
00
00
20
2366
00
01
21
2367
00
06
95
2365
00
00
20
2360
00
28
27
2364
00
01
20
2361
00
00
40
2363
00
00
20
2359
00
00
89
2358
00
00
31
489
00
16
06
490
00
01
01
484
00
04
81
491
00
07
36
492
00
09
09
493
00
02
56
495
00
19
16
518
00
09
60
523
00
03
99
522
00
05
97
526
00
06
36
525
00
00
20
535
00
03
73
527
00
02
92
528
00
01
06
1
2
3
4
5
6
4530
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
530
00
01
82
529
00
01
04
532
00
01
48
531
00
01
91
533
00
05
02
534
00
08
60
177
00
00
20
171
00
02
00
170
00
06
59
169
00
08
12
172
00
00
61
173
00
05
13
174
00
00
20
175
00
08
58
164
00
02
89
165
00
05
37
159
00
05
86
160
00
01
52
142
00
09
81
143
00
00
20
144
00
02
03
146
00
02
74
145
00
04
88
147
00
07
17
148
00
03
74
155
00
00
20
154
00
01
68
151
00
08
38
152
00
00
20
110
00
10
08
91
00
00
56
92
00
00
20
109
00
07
07
108
00
10
01
107
00
04
82
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4531
1
2
3
4
5
6
106
00
00
72
104
00
06
18
99
00
07
95
93
00
00
20
100
00
02
01
53 ukyk
00
01
54
51
00
10
75
52
00
00
20
39 jkLrk
00
04
70
38
00
10
03
37
00
06
02
36
00
07
66
32
00
06
81
30
00
01
85
33
00
06
40
25
00
15
72
24
00
00
20
23
00
07
47
722
00
00
20
723
00
07
51
730
00
08
26
731
00
00
20
16
00
06
29
9
00
04
70
741
00
08
73
743
00
00
20
740
00
11
36
744
00
01
76
749
00
07
11
748
00
00
20
763
00
09
93
762
00
09
93
752
00
00
52
753
00
06
29
761
00
01
62
1
2
3
4
5
6
4532
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
754
00
04
77
760
00
02
02
759
00
04
80
755
00
00
96
758
00
06
33
757
00
11
16
767
00
00
20
769
00
00
94
768
00
10
94
csyok jk; Vksyk cSjkxh
292
00
07
65
Fkkuk uacj&72
291
00
03
05
290
00
03
65
288
00
05
27
291@1824
00
00
20
287
00
06
79
286@1826
00
02
78
285
00
05
51
286
00
00
20
284
00
14
94
284@1831
00
04
29
282
00
00
34
281
00
03
08
272
00
00
20
280
00
17
94
279
00
00
20
276
00
08
75
274
00
00
20
275
00
03
48
277
00
02
69
225 jkLrk
00
10
04
218
00
07
25
217
00
05
71
20
00
31
08
216
00
02
03
21
00
10
02
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4533
1
2
3
4
5
6
15
00
13
13
14
00
00
20
19
00
01
06
16
00
09
59
17
00
00
20
18
00
00
20
13
00
08
61
11
00
04
33
10
00
02
48
8
00
08
54
9
00
00
20
4
00
21
68
3
00
00
20
78dPpk jkLrk
00
02
42
1
00
00
20
csyok jk; Vksyk ukjh vkjok
263
00
17
05
Fkkuk uacj&71
265
00
00
20
262
00
00
20
268
00
01
86
267
00
05
22
269
00
03
19
271
00
00
27
270
00
13
86
275
00
00
92
276
00
06
47
285 dsuky
00
05
05
284
00
11
21
282
00
00
30
247
00
12
36
248
00
00
20
245
00
00
64
244
00
00
20
243@1653
00
07
14
243
00
04
79
240
00
00
20
1
2
3
4
5
6
4534
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
242
00
06
46
241
00
00
63
231
00
07
38
229
00
00
20
230
00
07
20
210
00
04
72
209
00
17
72
208
00
04
39
Nijk Hkkl
8120
00
02
73
Fkkuk uacj&56
8121
00
03
52
8122
00
00
20
8119
00
08
93
8116
00
05
23
8117
00
04
80
8114
00
00
20
8113
00
07
02
8115
00
05
17
8112
00
10
31
8110
00
00
20
8111
00
00
92
8109
00
06
51
7942
00
00
20
7943
00
00
20
7944
00
00
20
8106
00
05
13
8105
00
04
19
8107
00
00
94
8108
00
00
20
8104@8162
00
02
33
8104
00
05
11
8103
00
03
44
8101
00
00
20
8102
00
12
51
8097
00
00
20
8098
00
23
85
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4535
1
2
3
4
5
6
7969
00
00
20
8096
00
00
20
8095
00
07
40
8094
00
00
77
8093
00
08
45
7980
00
07
53
8091
00
01
17
8092
00
00
20
8089
00
29
20
8088 jkLrk
00
05
09
8087
00
05
44
8085
00
00
20
8086¹dsuky
00
03
10
8084
00
18
49
8083
00
12
47
8081
00
02
06
8082
00
05
18
8080
00
05
31
8079
00
13
57
8077
00
09
61
8078
00
00
20
8063
00
07
90
8075
00
08
65
8074
00
05
87
8065
00
00
20
8066
00
07
43
8073
00
09
58
8072
00
00
20
8067
00
03
69
8059
00
03
29
8056
00
04
25
8048
00
05
20
8047
00
03
45
8042
00
04
43
8039
00
04
34
1
2
3
4
5
6
4536
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
8041
00
00
57
8038
00
05
04
8040
00
01
07
6436
00
00
69
8037
00
08
46
8036
00
00
20
6437
00
04
65
8035
00
00
47
6442
00
01
55
6443
00
00
20
8032
00
07
95
8031
00
05
32
8028
00
07
27
8027
00
03
35
6445
00
05
27
8026
00
00
20
7516
00
05
59
7513
00
03
79
7517
00
09
93
7519
00
00
82
7520
00
00
20
7535
00
00
20
7524
00
06
29
7521
00
00
20
7523
00
01
94
7522
00
01
84
7507
00
08
96
7500
00
14
25
7501
00
00
20
7499
00
00
20
7498
00
00
40
7497
00
22
42
7380
00
00
20
7496
00
01
88
7492
00
01
74
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4537
1
2
3
4
5
6
7493
00
05
87
7489
00
00
20
7490
00
05
61
7488
00
10
63
7486
00
07
27
7484
00
00
79
7491
00
12
02
7483
00
00
20
7386
00
00
20
7479
00
00
52
7478
00
10
02
7475
00
00
37
7476
00
02
43
7477
00
02
93
7463
00
03
45
7464
00
00
20
7461
00
09
20
7462
00
08
30
7447 jkLrk
00
04
18
6501
00
27
75
6502
00
06
60
6503
00
11
78
5971
00
00
69
5970
00
00
98
5969
00
05
85
5964
00
01
19
5965
00
07
17
5967
00
03
17
5966
00
02
76
5940
00
17
73
5939
00
03
93
5929
00
07
93
5938
00
01
88
5930
00
16
42
5924
00
02
53
1
2
3
4
5
6
4538
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
5918
00
07
16
5919
00
00
20
5932
00
00
20
5917
00
06
94
5916
00
05
98
5898
00
00
20
5900
00
00
20
5901
00
31
61
5905
00
00
20
5906
00
03
08
¹iQk- la- vkj-&25011@17@2013&vksvkj&Iº
iou oqQekj] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 5th August, 2013
S.O. 1630.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that a
pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited in Dist. East Champaran in the State of Bihar for ‘Patna to
Motihari and Baitalpur Pipeline’ for the transportation of Petroleum Product;
And, whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is
necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which is
described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals
Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its
intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on
which the copies of the notification issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette
of India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying
of the pipeline under the land, to Shri Arun Kumar Jha B.A.S. & Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited.
(Pipelines Division) P.O. Dhelwan, Sipara, Dist. Patna (Bihar.) Pin – 800020.
SCHEDULE
Dist.: Purba Champaran
State : Bihar
Mouja / Village
Survey/Block No.
Sub-Div-No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
DAMO BIRTI
1169
00
15
34
Thana No:-177
1172
00
00
20
1168
00
01
43
1167
00
06
15
1166
00
00
81
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4539
1
2
3
4
5
6
1164
00
00
92
1163
00
11
73
1161
00
00
20
1162
00
14
54
1159
00
01
85
1058(ROAD)
00
04
77
652
00
00
20
648
00
12
32
645
00
10
91
646
00
06
70
643
00
03
43
642
00
03
35
647
00
00
20
641
00
04
28
611
00
06
26
613
00
00
45
612
00
09
40
609
00
05
28
445
00
11
73
444
00
00
20
446
00
02
87
455
00
10
65
447
00
00
20
454
00
10
17
461
00
00
20
462
00
06
26
460
00
00
20
463
00
07
64
466
00
07
07
465
00
03
46
467
00
03
83
468
00
00
20
469
00
02
09
471
00
01
83
479
00
25
53
491
00
00
20
482
00
00
20
478
00
00
20
480
00
12
79
516
00
00
20
481
00
00
20
524
00
02
29
1
2
3
4
5
6
4540
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
518
00
04
82
520
00
04
54
521
00
00
20
522
00
00
20
519
00
15
02
514
00
00
20
517
00
00
20
512
00
01
96
NAWADA
1942
00
04
14
Thana No:-180
1943
00
00
69
1944
00
00
20
1941
00
07
70
1938
00
01
00
1939
00
00
20
1936
00
03
04
1937
00
12
37
1931
00
00
20
1930
00
02
73
1880
00
00
20
1881
00
18
15
1879
00
02
63
1876
00
06
64
1882
00
06
02
1874
00
04
19
1873
00
00
20
1884
00
01
51
1885
00
09
91
1886
00
00
20
1889
00
03
78
1887
00
00
26
1888
00
03
28
1890
00
00
20
1784
00
06
97
1785
00
05
29
1786
00
00
20
1783
00
00
20
1781
00
04
46
1782
00
05
19
1678
00
00
20
1679
00
06
29
1680
00
00
92
1681
00
06
17
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4541
1
2
3
4
5
6
1683
00
00
20
1684
00
00
20
1683/2060
00
01
47
1682
00
03
30
1698
00
06
60
1699
00
00
73
1697
00
01
23
1711
00
02
82
1709
00
00
20
1710
00
08
10
1712
00
00
65
1715/2062
00
08
03
1714
00
00
85
1715
00
08
55
1521
00
00
20
1519
00
00
20
1520
00
05
87
1716
00
00
20
1487
00
10
17
1486
00
04
62
1489
00
05
41
1495
00
03
13
1491
00
00
20
1490
00
00
20
1494
00
01
68
1496
00
07
70
1510
00
00
20
1497
00
01
23
1509
00
06
69
1502
00
09
66
1475
00
00
20
1503
00
06
56
1474
00
03
50
1471
00
00
20
1472/2052
00
00
20
1473
00
07
46
1553
00
00
20
1472
00
03
15
1427
00
07
08
1428
00
08
11
1429
00
03
62
1430
00
00
20
1
2
3
4
5
6
4542
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1425
00
00
20
1424
00
04
36
1423
00
06
13
1422
00
00
54
1407
00
06
50
1412
00
00
20
1411
00
02
36
1410
00
15
27
1415
00
01
11
1133(ROAD)
00
15
36
1130
00
00
20
1131
00
01
98
1129
00
00
20
1132
00
14
27
222
00
07
85
221
00
00
20
223
00
02
06
224
00
00
48
220
00
13
98
219
00
00
20
218
00
00
70
WOLHA
1051
00
00
20
Thana No:-165
1052
00
03
65
1038
00
12
81
1039
00
08
08
1040
00
08
83
1041
00
00
20
MISIR TOLA
496
00
00
39
Thana No:-163
493
00
10
16
502
00
06
21
503
00
09
20
505
00
01
04
504
00
00
83
364
00
00
20
479
00
10
26
480
00
00
90
478
00
08
34
477
00
06
18
365
00
02
39
386
00
04
38
389
00
00
20
387
00
05
22
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4543
1
2
3
4
5
6
388
00
02
53
384
00
05
37
370
00
00
20
385
00
00
20
383
00
06
83
382
00
00
20
378
00
10
10
379
00
02
30
377
00
00
84
330-Road
00
01
80
329-Road
00
03
31
310-Road
00
02
21
317
00
00
20
318
00
11
94
301-Canal
00
01
68
300
00
04
21
299
00
07
04
248
00
12
11
247
00
01
32
249
00
08
04
246
00
04
37
283-Road
00
02
71
266
00
09
21
267
00
02
98
267/499
00
01
80
263
00
00
20
262
00
00
20
264
00
16
56
255
00
00
20
260
00
02
29
257
00
06
30
258
00
03
11
129
00
14
21
131
00
01
25
152
00
11
49
151
00
02
51
150
00
06
71
140
00
05
98
139
00
00
67
138
00
00
20
141
00
12
13
142
00
00
20
1
2
3
4
5
6
4544
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
93
00
11
71
92-Road
00
02
07
143
00
00
88
90
00
14
40
91
00
00
20
89
00
17
17
88
00
00
20
85
00
00
65
86
00
20
49
87
00
00
20
2
00
36
63
28
00
04
16
27
00
21
22
26
00
01
71
25
00
00
20
21
00
00
46
1-Nala
00
02
61
511-Nala
00
01
75
AHIR GANWA
402
00
03
95
Thana No:-162
401
00
09
60
400-Road
00
04
55
399
00
06
52
398
00
14
48
396
00
11
33
44
00
14
56
46
00
16
28
51
00
06
38
36
00
52
21
17
00
09
76
16
00
13
18
15
00
11
16
RAMPURWA
246
00
12
46
Thana No:-160
261
00
19
27
262
00
05
95
260
00
12
32
263
00
00
20
282
00
06
48
265
00
11
66
281
00
02
37
279
00
02
57
280
00
20
24
277
00
00
20
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4545
1
2
3
4
5
6
294
00
22
88
295
00
00
20
296
00
02
14
297
00
27
58
328
00
00
20
336-Road
00
06
58
337
00
02
51
7
00
20
77
6
00
00
20
9
00
07
48
8
00
05
49
10
00
01
95
11
00
00
20
12-Nala
00
04
05
GAY GHAT
213-Mekhwa Nadi
00
06
55
Thana No:-153
214-Mekhwa Nadi
00
07
24
215-Mekhwa Nadi
00
02
12
216
00
10
01
217
00
00
20
208
00
08
25
220
00
13
38
221
00
15
24
230
01
12
26
144-SH-54
00
03
19
265
00
00
20
262
00
02
59
143-Cart track
00
02
26
128
00
32
56
139
00
05
21
112
00
11
08
142
00
53
19
97
00
00
34
96
00
03
34
93
00
05
36
91
00
10
84
89
00
00
20
87
00
00
20
88
00
10
54
85
00
07
43
86
00
00
20
84
00
10
28
83
00
00
59
1
2
3
4
5
6
4546
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
81
00
07
94
82
00
00
66
267-Road
00
04
28
LOHIYAR UJAIN
(Road)
00
04
02
Thana No:-133
2745
00
08
06
2746
00
02
60
2747
00
13
55
2748
00
03
11
2753
00
01
12
2752
00
03
15
2761
00
19
63
2762
00
00
20
2764
00
05
73
2760
00
00
57
2759
00
02
82
2682-Road
00
01
89
2765
00
10
36
2768
00
08
97
2785
00
18
02
2767
00
06
73
2787
00
01
06
2786 (Road)
00
00
26
2678
00
06
73
2676
00
30
79
2677
00
02
63
2675
00
00
26
2654
00
14
50
2650
00
07
94
2656
00
06
23
2655
00
04
73
2644
00
13
91
2646
00
09
72
2647
00
19
08
2611
00
21
85
2607
00
04
76
2606
00
00
96
2605
00
09
84
2597
00
06
05
2598
00
00
20
2595
00
11
61
2596
00
10
15
2589
00
19
22
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4547
1
2
3
4
5
6
2588
00
00
20
2573
00
12
93
2572
00
17
21
3010
00
07
91
2574
00
01
53
2570
00
03
24
2568
00
07
83
2563
00
04
67
2564
00
00
20
2566
00
14
29
2567
00
00
52
2553
00
51
55
2554
00
10
34
1764
00
00
20
1765
00
00
66
1727
00
00
20
1762
00
18
84
1729
00
05
87
1730
00
07
46
1725
00
21
27
1724
00
02
66
1721
00
34
09
1622-Road
00
03
38
1709
00
00
20
1708
00
00
20
1623-Nala
00
06
73
1545
00
39
54
1544
00
00
20
1543
00
07
15
1546
00
05
74
1542
00
25
78
1541
00
08
91
1540
00
00
20
1522(Dhanauti River)
00
12
17
JAISINHPUR Thana No:-85
4291
00
07
14
4292
00
04
23
4289
00
03
96
4250-Road
00
03
82
4286
00
08
30
4283
00
03
82
4284
00
01
42
4282
00
07
15
1
2
3
4
5
6
4548
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
4272
00
04
34
4281
00
11
64
4280
00
12
95
4278
00
09
30
4277
00
07
58
4298
00
09
37
4305
00
00
20
4299
00
10
61
4300
00
02
15
4301
00
00
20
4538-Cart track
00
28
10
4541
00
03
05
4540
00
01
15
4539
00
00
20
4537
00
06
41
4536
00
02
67
4502-Road
00
03
60
4464
00
17
45
4489
00
08
20
4490
00
00
20
4488
00
13
68
4467
00
00
20
4483
00
05
05
4480
00
03
68
4482
00
00
97
4472
00
00
20
4481
00
02
15
4473
00
05
60
4437
00
01
77
4474
00
12
22
4477
00
15
42
4418
00
00
20
4505
00
00
20
4475
00
00
20
4476
00
00
20
4436
00
00
20
4435
00
15
08
4427
00
26
87
4425
00
04
20
4426
00
09
60
4424
00
13
77
4445
00
00
40
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4549
1
2
3
4
5
6
4381
00
20
75
4392
00
00
20
4391
00
00
45
4382
00
00
62
4383
00
00
20
4390
00
13
64
4389-6841
00
01
89
4389
00
10
57
4388
00
00
75
4013-Road
00
04
97
4015
00
22
21
4020
00
00
20
4019
00
19
67
4021
00
00
68
4022
00
22
69
4023
00
11
77
3968
00
00
39
3964 -Road
00
05
71
2744
00
07
10
2743
00
00
32
2745
00
17
66
2747
00
27
00
2746
00
00
20
2739
00
00
20
2748
00
17
63
2749
00
00
20
2727
00
03
30
2738
00
00
94
2728
00
04
11
2729
00
09
09
2731
00
09
73
2732
00
07
41
2730
00
05
17
2532-Road
00
04
69
2523
00
11
42
2524
00
08
74
2525
00
06
33
2526
00
02
11
2501
00
01
28
2502
00
00
20
2500
00
09
14
2499
00
05
57
1
2
3
4
5
6
4550
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2498
00
08
50
2432
00
15
71
2433
00
00
20
2449
00
07
09
2431
00
14
01
2450
00
06
74
2451
00
08
71
2454
00
00
20
2453
00
00
20
2430
00
00
66
2387
00
31
89
2461/6829
00
04
99
2462
00
00
20
2463
00
00
80
2386
00
01
63
2368-Road
00
05
71
2385
00
00
20
2366
00
01
21
2367
00
06
95
2365
00
00
20
2360
00
28
27
2364
00
01
20
2361
00
00
40
2363
00
00
20
2359
00
00
89
2358
00
00
31
489
00
16
06
490
00
01
01
484
00
04
81
491
00
07
36
492
00
09
09
493
00
02
56
495
00
19
16
518
00
09
60
523
00
03
99
522
00
05
97
526
00
06
36
525
00
00
20
535
00
03
73
527
00
02
92
528
00
01
06
530
00
01
82
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4551
1
2
3
4
5
6
529
00
01
04
532
00
01
48
531
00
01
91
533
00
05
02
534
00
08
60
177
00
00
20
171
00
02
00
170
00
06
59
169
00
08
12
172
00
00
61
173
00
05
13
174
00
00
20
175
00
08
58
164
00
02
89
165
00
05
37
159
00
05
86
160
00
01
52
142
00
09
81
143
00
00
20
144
00
02
03
146
00
02
74
145
00
04
88
147
00
07
17
148
00
03
74
155
00
00
20
154
00
01
68
151
00
08
38
152
00
00
20
110
00
10
08
91
00
00
56
92
00
00
20
109
00
07
07
108
00
10
01
107
00
04
82
106
00
00
72
104
00
06
18
99
00
07
95
93
00
00
20
100
00
02
01
53-Nala
00
01
54
51
00
10
75
52
00
00
20
1
2
3
4
5
6
4552
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
39-Road
00
04
70
38
00
10
03
37
00
06
02
36
00
07
66
32
00
06
81
30
00
01
85
33
00
06
40
25
00
15
72
24
00
00
20
23
00
07
47
722
00
00
20
723
00
07
51
730
00
08
26
731
00
00
20
16
00
06
29
9
00
04
70
741
00
08
73
743
00
00
20
740
00
11
36
744
00
01
76
749
00
07
11
748
00
00
20
763
00
09
93
762
00
09
93
752
00
00
52
753
00
06
29
761
00
01
62
754
00
04
77
760
00
02
02
759
00
04
80
755
00
00
96
758
00
06
33
757
00
11
16
767
00
00
20
769
00
00
94
768
00
10
94
BELWA RAY TOLA BAIRAGI
292
00
07
65
Thana No:-72
291
00
03
05
290
00
03
65
288
00
05
27
291/1824
00
00
20
287
00
06
79
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4553
1
2
3
4
5
6
286/1826
00
02
78
285
00
05
51
286
00
00
20
284
00
14
94
284/1831
00
04
29
282
00
00
34
281
00
03
08
272
00
00
20
280
00
17
94
279
00
00
20
276
00
08
75
274
00
00
20
275
00
03
48
277
00
02
69
225(Road)
00
10
04
218
00
07
25
217
00
05
71
20
00
31
08
216
00
02
03
21
00
10
02
15
00
13
13
14
00
00
20
19
00
01
06
16
00
09
59
17
00
00
20
18
00
00
20
13
00
08
61
11
00
04
33
10
00
02
48
8
00
08
54
9
00
00
20
4
00
21
68
3
00
00
20
78(Cart track)
00
02
42
1
00
00
20
BELWA RAY TOLA
263
00
17
05
NARIARWA
265
00
00
20
Thana No:-71
262
00
00
20
268
00
01
86
267
00
05
22
269
00
03
19
271
00
00
27
1
2
3
4
5
6
4554
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
270
00
13
86
275
00
00
92
276
00
06
47
285-CANAL
00
05
05
284
00
11
21
282
00
00
30
247
00
12
36
248
00
00
20
245
00
00
64
244
00
00
20
243/1653
00
07
14
243
00
04
79
240
00
00
20
242
00
06
46
241
00
00
63
231
00
07
38
229
00
00
20
230
00
07
20
210
00
04
72
209
00
17
72
208
00
04
39
CHHAPRA BHAS
8120
00
02
73
Thana No:-56
8121
00
03
52
8122
00
00
20
8119
00
08
93
8116
00
05
23
8117
00
04
80
8114
00
00
20
8113
00
07
02
8115
00
05
17
8112
00
10
31
8110
00
00
20
8111
00
00
92
8109
00
06
51
7942
00
00
20
7943
00
00
20
7944
00
00
20
8106
00
05
13
8105
00
04
19
8107
00
00
94
8108
00
00
20
8104/8162
00
02
33
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4555
1
2
3
4
5
6
8104
00
05
11
8103
00
03
44
8101
00
00
20
8102
00
12
51
8097
00
00
20
8098
00
23
85
7969
00
00
20
8096
00
00
20
8095
00
07
40
8094
00
00
77
8093
00
08
45
7980
00
07
53
8091
00
01
17
8092
00
00
20
8089
00
29
20
8088 (Road)
00
05
09
8087
00
05
44
8085
00
00
20
8086 (Canal)
00
03
10
8084
00
18
49
8083
00
12
47
8081
00
02
06
8082
00
05
18
8080
00
05
31
8079
00
13
57
8077
00
09
61
8078
00
00
20
8063
00
07
90
8075
00
08
65
8074
00
05
87
8065
00
00
20
8066
00
07
43
8073
00
09
58
8072
00
00
20
8067
00
03
69
8059
00
03
29
8056
00
04
25
8048
00
05
20
8047
00
03
45
8042
00
04
43
8039
00
04
34
8041
00
00
57
1
2
3
4
5
6
4556
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
8038
00
05
04
8040
00
01
07
6436
00
00
69
8037
00
08
46
8036
00
00
20
6437
00
04
65
8035
00
00
47
6442
00
01
55
6443
00
00
20
8032
00
07
95
8031
00
05
32
8028
00
07
27
8027
00
03
35
6445
00
05
27
8026
00
00
20
7516
00
05
59
7513
00
03
79
7517
00
09
93
7519
00
00
82
7520
00
00
20
7535
00
00
20
7524
00
06
29
7521
00
00
20
7523
00
01
94
7522
00
01
84
7507
00
08
96
7500
00
14
25
7501
00
00
20
7499
00
00
20
7498
00
00
40
7497
00
22
42
7380
00
00
20
7496
00
01
88
7492
00
01
74
7493
00
05
87
7489
00
00
20
7490
00
05
61
7488
00
10
63
7486
00
07
27
7484
00
00
79
7491
00
12
02
7483
00
00
20
7386
00
00
20
7479
00
00
52
7478
00
10
02
7475
00
00
37
7476
00
02
43
7477
00
02
93
7463
00
03
45
7464
00
00
20
7461
00
09
20
7462
00
08
30
7447(Road)
00
04
18
6501
00
27
75
6502
00
06
60
6503
00
11
78
5971
00
00
69
5970
00
00
98
5969
00
05
85
5964
00
01
19
5965
00
07
17
5967
00
03
17
5966
00
02
76
5940
00
17
73
5939
00
03
93
5929
00
07
93
5938
00
01
88
5930
00
16
42
5924
00
02
53
5918
00
07
16
5919
00
00
20
5932
00
00
20
5917
00
06
94
5916
00
05
98
5898
00
00
20
5900
00
00
20
5901
00
31
61
5905
00
00
20
5906
00
03
08
[F. No. R-25011/17/2013-OR-I]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4557
1
2
3
4
5
6
ubZ fnYyh] 5 vxLr] 2013
dk-vk- 1631-—dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slk izrhr gksrk gS fd yksd fgr esa ;g vko”;d gS fd iVuk ls eksfrgkjh vkSj csrkyiqj
rd isVªksfy;e inkFkksZ ds ifjogu gsrq ftyk iqcZ paikju] jkT; fcgkj esa bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs”ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkuh
pkfg, A
vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slh ikbiykbu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, vko”;d izrhr gksrk gS fd ml Hkwfe esa ftlds Hkhrj
mDr ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkus dk izLrko gS vkSj tks bl vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa of.kZr gS] mi;ksx dk vtZu fd;k tk,(
vr% vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbUl ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½ vf/kfu;e] 1962 ¼1962
dk 50½ dh /kkjk 3 dh mi&/kkjk¼1½ }kjk iznÙk “kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] mDr Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/akdkj dk vtZu djus ds vius
vk”k; dh ?kks’k.kk djrh gSA
dksbZ O;fDr] tks mDr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa fgrc) gS] ml rkjh[k ls ftldks] Hkkjr ds jkti= esa ;Fkk izdkf”kr
bl vf/klwpuk dh izfr;ka lk/kkj.k turk dks miyC/k djk nh tkrh gS] bDdhl fnu ds vUnj] Hkwfe ds Hkhrj ikbiykbu fcNk, tkus
gsrq mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj ds vtZu ds fy,] Jh v:.k dqekj >k] fc-iz-ls- o l{ke izkf/kdkjh bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs”ku fyfeVsM]
¼ikbiykbu fMohtu½ iVuk] iks-vks- <syok] flikjk] ftyk iVuk] fiu% 800020] fcgkj dks fyf[kr :i eas vk{ksi Hkst ldsxkA
vuqlwph
ftyk iwoZ paikju
jkT; % fcgkj
ekStk@xzke
losZ@Cykd@la- (IyksV la-)
lc&Mho&la-
{ks=kiQy
gsDVs;j
vkjs
oxZ ehVj
1
2
3
4
5
6
fcljkeiqj
700 unh
00
17
87
nqcSfy;k
696
00
20
59
Fkkuk uacj&206
695
00
44
43
674
00
01
50
702
00
00
57
673
01
59
59
697
00
05
57
698
00
11
39
665
01
69
45
672
00
09
91
634
00
12
63
633
00
00
20
472
00
02
36
471
00
00
20
473
00
01
93
721
00
01
86
719
00
03
97
474
00
09
37
750 ,EcsdEksUV
00
01
84
4558
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4559
fcljkeiqj
489
00
00
20
nqcSfy;k
488
00
07
05
Fkkuk uacj&206
487
00
03
25
490
00
17
71
440
00
26
05
443
00
00
20
439
00
06
97
438
00
08
69
437
00
05
77
402
00
00
20
413 dPpk jkLrk
00
04
63
426
00
00
20
425
00
00
20
401
00
00
20
403
00
03
63
434
00
00
90
406
00
18
17
409
00
03
71
408
00
00
20
410
00
00
40
361
00
23
96
362
00
00
54
363
00
00
20
360
00
00
20
334 jkLrk
00
01
42
gqlsuh
5950
00
07
43
Fkkuk uacj&245
5951
00
02
89
5952
00
05
13
5953
00
09
84
5954
00
08
52
5945
00
00
20
5944
00
00
20
5943
00
00
93
5956
00
01
99
5957
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4560
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
gqlsuh
5942
00
05
45
Fkkuk uacj&245
5941
00
03
58
5940
00
04
52
5937
00
00
20
5938
00
01
15
5939
00
03
52
5933
00
00
20
5915 dPpk jkLrk
00
01
69
5934
00
01
83
5935
00
03
52
6039
00
00
20
6040
00
14
45
6038
00
00
20
5914jkLrk
00
01
68
5913jkLrk
00
01
96
5912jkLrk
00
01
42
3113
00
08
42
3112
00
04
11
3106
00
00
20
3105
00
08
72
3108
00
09
57
3104
00
00
20
3103
00
00
47
3102
00
03
09
3109
00
03
30
3101
00
05
27
3100
00
00
20
3072
00
07
35
3073
00
04
44
3074
00
04
63
3075
00
04
84
3076
00
00
20
3088
00
04
02
3077
00
02
16
3078
00
05
00
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4561
gqlsuh
3079
00
04
31
Fkkuk uacj&245
3087
00
00
20
3080
00
04
11
3081
00
05
02
3082
00
13
01
3018
00
00
20
3083
00
00
20
2925
00
00
84
2992
00
00
48
2991
00
02
57
3082
00
13
01
2990
00
03
94
2989
00
05
08
2994
00
00
28
2988
00
02
30
2926
00
00
20
2987
00
02
71
2986
00
01
74
2985
00
02
78
2996
00
00
20
2984
00
01
53
2999
00
01
93
2976
00
07
86
2975
00
03
08
2974
00
02
19
2973
00
01
94
3002
00
00
20
2972
00
00
91
2971
00
04
57
2970
00
04
33
2967
00
01
79
2966
00
00
18
2965
00
00
20
2960dPpk jkLrk
00
01
77
666dPpk jkLrk
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4562
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
gqlsuh
667
00
00
20
Fkkuk uacj&245
2872
00
60
07
668dPpk jkLrk
00
01
23
2870
00
08
22
648jkLrk
00
03
40
756
00
01
87
735
00
00
20
757
00
01
43
758
00
00
20
755
00
07
47
753
00
00
65
752
00
00
20
754
00
03
85
771
00
01
22
772
00
03
01
773
00
00
20
750
00
14
59
749
00
04
72
775
00
03
63
440
00
01
88
445
00
00
20
441
00
00
20
439
00
04
97
437
00
00
47
438
00
09
59
436
00
01
80
425
00
08
55
435
00
00
20
424
00
00
78
430
00
01
57
427
00
02
71
426
00
00
20
418
00
01
73
417
00
00
55
428
00
07
66
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4563
gqlsuh
429
00
00
20
Fkkuk uacj&245
320
00
04
44
321
00
00
20
319
00
07
41
801
00
00
20
318
00
02
36
316
00
00
20
803
00
14
91
802
00
00
51
804
00
02
02
811
00
02
11
810
00
04
37
805
00
00
20
806
00
00
20
809
00
07
17
292jkLrk
00
01
08
291jkLrk
00
01
13
290jkLrk
00
01
03
818
00
05
47
817
00
00
20
819
00
10
43
288 ukyk
00
10
47
244
00
01
57
233
00
07
78
232
00
12
28
235
00
00
20
231
00
09
96
230
00
05
71
226
00
06
97
222
00
00
20
223
00
02
51
224
00
09
88
225
00
00
20
213
00
02
06
212
00
09
56
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4564
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
gqlsuh
210
00
00
20
Fkkuk uacj&245
1158jkLrk
00
03
92
1013
00
01
99
1014
00
10
76
1015
00
06
29
1016
00
19
56
1020
00
00
20
1022
00
00
81
1023
00
08
64
1025
00
03
64
1026
00
00
20
1024
00
09
45
1032
00
09
92
1031
00
00
20
1033
00
00
20
1040
00
00
20
1039
00
01
10
1038
00
13
31
1037
00
07
55
1113
00
00
20
1036
00
07
04
1114
00
00
30
1115
00
05
24
1121
00
00
20
1119
00
05
27
1120
00
09
52
1118
00
00
20
1129
00
00
20
1128
00
07
23
1130
00
18
74
1157dPpk jkLrk
00
02
28
1155
00
03
21
1154
00
00
20
1156
00
04
39
1158 jkLrk
00
03
12
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4565
1417
00
08
28
1418
00
00
20
1419
00
00
20
1411
00
18
68
1412
00
00
63
1413
00
00
20
1410
00
00
20
1409
00
14
14
1431
00
04
46
1408
00
03
43
1407
00
00
20
1433
00
20
07
1400
00
00
20
1399
00
02
51
1398
00
00
20
1434dPpk jkLrk
00
04
39
1441
00
27
97
1439
00
00
32
jkeiqj [ktqfj;k
3140
00
00
20
Fkkuk uacj&35
3141
00
02
05
3142
00
04
98
3143
00
00
20
lsEHkqvkiqj
1424
00
17
07
Fkkuk uacj&36
1347
00
00
20
1346
00
02
83
1345
00
10
15
1344
00
10
84
1342
00
04
17
1294
00
01
51
1215
00
00
57
1216
00
01
16
1213
00
13
75
1217
00
08
61
1219
00
04
92
1264
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4566
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
lsEHkqvkiqj
1220
00
19
67
Fkkuk uacj&36
1262
00
00
20
1261
00
01
85
1260
00
02
86
1259
00
05
16
1256
00
00
20
1258
00
03
84
1257
00
04
96
1252
00
01
80
1232
00
06
79
1233
00
05
98
1245
00
04
83
1246
00
01
38
1244
00
04
53
1247
00
00
20
1243
00
06
51
1242
00
02
98
1241
00
00
20
1497
00
02
10
1510
00
00
20
1506
00
19
46
1507
00
04
63
1505
00
00
21
1727
00
11
05
1730
00
26
85
1733
00
17
85
1734
00
01
78
1732
00
47
55
1735
00
00
62
1736
00
05
36
1737
00
08
84
1739
00
06
74
779
00
00
49
1740
00
07
90
1743
00
01
68
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4567
1742
00
06
88
762
00
00
84
1744
00
08
34
1763
00
01
46
1749
00
04
38
1750
00
06
29
1751
00
00
20
1752
00
00
90
1753
00
03
05
1754
00
02
71
1755
00
02
72
1756
00
02
04
1757
00
03
96
1758
00
01
02
1760
00
00
20
1759
00
06
17
cjgkjok [kqnZ
1295
00
09
02
Fkkuk uacj&34
1296
00
00
20
1294
00
05
89
1289
00
00
86
1291
00
01
42
1292
00
07
41
1293
00
06
80
1285
00
00
68
1284
00
05
50
1280
00
07
99
1185
00
00
27
1232
00
00
20
1279
00
08
63
1278
00
00
20
1234
00
08
20
1277
00
03
38
1275
00
03
68
1276
00
00
99
1274
00
03
34
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4568
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1273
00
18
04
1236
00
01
44
1237
00
00
20
1239
00
04
17
1240
00
00
20
1272
00
02
87
1271
00
03
18
1242
00
10
84
1269
00
01
96
1245
00
05
39
1246
00
05
27
1247
00
03
30
1248
00
03
31
1249
00
06
32
1250
00
04
76
1251
00
00
31
1252
00
00
20
1254
00
00
20
1253
00
05
36
1256
00
04
47
1255
00
00
54
1260
00
07
88
1264@1659
00
09
91
1264
00
06
13
991
00
00
82
ljksrkj
8743 dPpk jkLrk
00
01
33
Fkkuk uacj&33
8740
00
09
59
8742
00
00
45
8741
00
03
42
8736
00
02
56
8737
00
00
70
8738
00
01
95
8739
00
00
20
8735
00
01
88
8734
00
03
04
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4569
8732
00
02
57
8731
00
12
03
8730
00
00
20
8727
00
07
79
8724
00
00
20
8726
00
07
33
8415
00
00
20
8725
00
07
42
8714
00
04
00
8417
00
00
20
8418
00
06
59
8712
00
05
39
8420
00
09
99
8119
00
00
20
8422
00
07
47
8421
00
01
51
8118
00
00
20
8425
00
00
61
8426
00
03
52
8427
00
05
77
8431 jkLrk
00
00
20
7971
00
00
20
7970
00
01
96
7969
00
04
00
7968
00
00
20
7945
00
10
82
7943
00
00
20
7946
00
03
51
7942
00
01
58
7947
00
02
32
7941
00
02
85
7948
00
02
70
7961
00
03
48
7949
00
01
24
7950
00
00
98
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4570
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
7953
00
00
20
7952
00
03
71
7951
00
03
45
7954
00
04
19
7955
00
06
10
7956
00
03
01
7931
00
03
94
7906
00
00
28
7907
00
00
20
7930
00
02
07
7929
00
02
63
7908
00
00
20
7928
00
05
42
7925
00
03
17
7922
00
03
76
7921
00
01
78
7909
00
00
20
7911
00
03
10
7919
00
01
59
7913
00
00
20
7912
00
07
64
7897
00
03
39
7900
00
02
34
7898
00
00
40
7899
00
05
74
7980
00
00
26
7894
00
01
29
4774
00
01
58
7880
00
00
20
8000
00
06
92
7999
00
00
20
8001
00
02
02
8002
00
05
57
8017
00
00
20
8018
00
08
49
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4571
8023
00
10
81
8022
00
00
20
4607
00
05
84
4608
00
15
12
4606
00
00
20
4619
00
00
20
1313
00
00
48
1311
00
04
77
4620
00
00
20
1312
00
03
45
1310
00
00
39
1308
00
13
29
1307
00
00
32
1306
00
00
20
1305
00
09
53
1304
00
00
20
1303
00
07
94
1301
00
00
20
1300
00
00
20
1298
00
10
85
1297
00
00
20
1299
00
04
87
1296
00
05
23
4675
00
15
46
1295
00
00
20
4677
00
03
76
4678
00
02
64
4679
00
01
69
1294
00
00
52
4680
00
16
72
1138
00
04
08
931
00
09
33
934
00
00
20
925
00
02
52
933
00
13
23
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4572
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
936
00
00
20
937
00
00
38
924
00
32
71
916
00
00
31
949
00
03
67
990
00
02
18
991
00
07
04
998
00
05
87
999
00
03
15
997
00
00
20
1000
00
04
17
1001
00
02
93
1008
00
03
61
1003
00
03
08
1007
00
07
71
1006
00
01
39
1015
00
00
20
1006@9336
00
06
73
1016
00
01
31
1027
00
03
38
1026
00
04
48
1028
00
00
20
1025
00
03
58
1017
00
00
20
1019
00
09
27
1023
00
00
20
1021
00
00
52
1020
00
06
83
576
00
03
68
575
00
05
73
574
00
00
20
515
00
04
11
516
00
07
47
512
00
00
20
518
00
01
58
519
00
05
85
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4573
520
00
04
67
488
00
03
95
489
00
06
06
487
00
00
20
486
00
13
05
485
00
00
60
484
00
05
99
480
00
10
64
458
00
00
20
459
00
06
93
467
00
00
20
460
00
00
20
464
00
00
89
463
00
12
10
462
00
01
39
97 jkLrk
00
03
15
1670
00
05
11
1668
00
06
42
1667
00
00
20
1672
00
03
64
1673
00
09
76
1674
00
02
37
1741
00
02
39
1740
00
06
78
1739
00
04
79
1745
00
00
65
1738
00
09
86
1746
00
00
71
1737
00
06
79
1736
00
00
20
1730
00
10
25
1765
00
00
20
1766
00
09
06
1729
00
03
76
1767
00
04
72
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4574
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1768
00
09
26
1760
00
00
20
1759
00
07
49
1758
00
01
31
1810
00
04
56
1810@9339
00
04
26
1809
00
13
97
1808
00
06
57
1807
00
00
20
1806
00
02
23
1806@9329
00
10
38
1804
00
00
20
1803
00
21
80
1802
00
02
67
1864
00
12
67
1865
00
00
65
1862
00
06
62
1880
00
15
53
1882
00
02
52
1883
00
11
43
1884
00
00
20
1886
00
02
98
1885
00
18
75
1888
00
15
54
1891
00
01
07
1939
00
14
89
1925
00
00
53
1926
00
02
38
1927
00
02
91
1928
00
02
90
1929
00
03
65
1930
00
03
36
1933
00
02
67
1931
00
03
20
1932
00
01
04
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4575
1935
00
17
43
1922
00
09
90
1921
00
00
20
42
00
06
25
37
00
00
20
41
00
32
04
39
00
00
46
40
00
08
91
15
00
05
98
14
00
00
20
¹iQk- la- vkj&25011@17@2013&vksvkj&Iº
iou oqQekj] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 5th August, 2013
S.O. 1631.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest
that a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited in Dist. East Champaran in the State of Bihar
for ‘Patna to Motihari and Baitalpur Pipeline’ for the transportation of Petroleum Product;
And, whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is
necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which
is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and
Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby
declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the
date on which the copies of the notification issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as
published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of
the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land, to Shri Arun Kumar Jha B.A.S. & Competent
Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited. (Pipelines Division) P.O. Dhelwan, Sipara, Dist. Patna (Bihar.) Pin –
800020.
SCHEDULE
Dist.: Purba Champaran
State : Bihar
Mouja / Village
Survey/BlockNo.
Sub-Div-No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
BISHRAMPUR DUBAULIYA
700(river)
00
17
87
Thana No:-206
696
00
20
59
695
00
44
43
674
00
01
50
702
00
00
57
673
01
59
59
697
00
05
57
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4576
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
698
00
11
39
665
01
69
45
672
00
09
91
634
00
12
63
633
00
00
20
472
00
02
36
471
00
00
20
473
00
01
93
721
00
01
86
719
00
03
97
474
00
09
37
750
00
01
84
489
00
00
20
488
00
07
05
487
00
03
25
490
00
17
71
440
00
26
05
443
00
00
20
439
00
06
97
438
00
08
69
437
00
05
77
402
00
00
20
413 (CART TRACK)
00
04
63
426
00
00
20
425
00
00
20
401
00
00
20
403
00
03
63
434
00
00
90
406
00
18
17
409
00
03
71
408
00
00
20
410
00
00
40
361
00
23
96
362
00
00
54
363
00
00
20
360
00
00
20
334(ROAD)
00
01
42
HUSENI
5950
00
07
43
Thana No:-245
5951
00
02
89
5952
00
05
13
5953
00
09
84
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4577
5954
00
08
52
5945
00
00
20
5944
00
00
20
5943
00
00
93
5956
00
01
99
5957
00
00
20
5942
00
05
45
5941
00
03
58
5940
00
04
52
5937
00
00
20
5938
00
01
15
5939
00
03
52
5933
00
00
20
5915 (Cart track)
00
01
69
5934
00
01
83
5935
00
03
52
6039
00
00
20
6040
00
14
45
6038
00
00
20
5914(Road)
00
01
68
5913(Road)
00
01
96
5912(Road)
00
01
42
3113
00
08
42
3112
00
04
11
3106
00
00
20
3105
00
08
72
3108
00
09
57
3104
00
00
20
3103
00
00
47
3102
00
03
09
3109
00
03
30
3101
00
05
27
3100
00
00
20
3072
00
07
35
3073
00
04
44
3074
00
04
63
3075
00
04
84
3076
00
00
20
3088
00
04
02
3077
00
02
16
3078
00
05
00
3079
00
04
31
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4578
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
3087
00
00
20
3080
00
04
11
3081
00
05
02
3082
00
13
01
3018
00
00
20
3083
00
00
20
2925
00
00
84
2992
00
00
48
2991
00
02
57
2990
00
03
94
2989
00
05
08
2994
00
00
28
2988
00
02
30
2926
00
00
20
2987
00
02
71
2986
00
01
74
2985
00
02
78
2996
00
00
20
2984
00
01
53
2999
00
01
93
2976
00
07
86
2975
00
03
08
2974
00
02
19
2973
00
01
94
3002
00
00
20
2972
00
00
91
2971
00
04
57
2970
00
04
33
2967
00
01
79
2966
00
00
18
2965
00
00
20
2960(Cart track)
00
01
77
666(Cart track)
00
00
20
667
00
00
20
2872
00
60
07
668(Cart track)
00
01
23
2870
00
08
22
648(Road)
00
03
40
756
00
01
87
735
00
00
20
757
00
01
43
758
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4579
755
00
07
47
753
00
00
65
752
00
00
20
754
00
03
85
771
00
01
22
772
00
03
01
773
00
00
20
750
00
14
59
749
00
04
72
775
00
03
63
440
00
01
88
445
00
00
20
441
00
00
20
439
00
04
97
437
00
00
47
438
00
09
59
436
00
01
80
425
00
08
55
435
00
00
20
424
00
00
78
430
00
01
57
427
00
02
71
426
00
00
20
418
00
01
73
417
00
00
55
428
00
07
66
429
00
00
20
320
00
04
44
321
00
00
20
319
00
07
41
801
00
00
20
318
00
02
36
316
00
00
20
803
00
14
91
802
00
00
51
804
00
02
02
811
00
02
11
810
00
04
37
805
00
00
20
806
00
00
20
809
00
07
17
292(Road)
00
01
08
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4580
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
291(Road)
00
01
13
290(Road)
00
01
03
818
00
05
47
817
00
00
20
819
00
10
43
288(Nala)
00
10
47
244
00
01
57
233
00
07
78
232
00
12
28
235
00
00
20
231
00
09
96
230
00
05
71
226
00
06
97
222
00
00
20
223
00
02
51
224
00
09
88
225
00
00
20
213
00
02
06
212
00
09
56
210
00
00
20
1158(Road)
00
03
92
1013
00
01
99
1014
00
10
76
1015
00
06
29
1016
00
19
56
1020
00
00
20
1022
00
00
81
1023
00
08
64
1025
00
03
64
1026
00
00
20
1024
00
09
45
1032
00
09
92
1031
00
00
20
1033
00
00
20
1040
00
00
20
1039
00
01
10
1038
00
13
31
1037
00
07
55
1113
00
00
20
1036
00
07
04
1114
00
00
30
1115
00
05
24
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4581
1121
00
00
20
1119
00
05
27
1120
00
09
52
1118
00
00
20
1129
00
00
20
1128
00
07
23
1130
00
18
74
1157(Cart track)
00
02
28
1155
00
03
21
1154
00
00
20
1156
00
04
39
1158-Road
00
03
12
1417
00
08
28
1418
00
00
20
1419
00
00
20
1411
00
18
68
1412
00
00
63
1413
00
00
20
1410
00
00
20
1409
00
14
14
1431
00
04
46
1408
00
03
43
1407
00
00
20
1433
00
20
07
1400
00
00
20
1399
00
02
51
1398
00
00
20
1434(Cart track)
00
04
39
1441
00
27
97
1439
00
00
32
RAMPUR
3140
00
00
20
KHAJURIYA Thana No:-35
3141
00
02
05
3142
00
04
98
3143
00
00
20
SEMBHUAPUR
1424
00
17
07
Thana No:-36
1347
00
00
20
1346
00
02
83
1345
00
10
15
1344
00
10
84
1342
00
04
17
1294
00
01
51
1215
00
00
57
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4582
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1216
00
01
16
1213
00
13
75
1217
00
08
61
1219
00
04
92
1264
00
00
20
1220
00
19
67
1262
00
00
20
1261
00
01
85
1260
00
02
86
1259
00
05
16
1256
00
00
20
1258
00
03
84
1257
00
04
96
1252
00
01
80
1232
00
06
79
1233
00
05
98
1245
00
04
83
1246
00
01
38
1244
00
04
53
1247
00
00
20
1243
00
06
51
1242
00
02
98
1241
00
00
20
1497
00
02
10
1510
00
00
20
1506
00
19
46
1507
00
04
63
1505
00
00
21
1727
00
11
05
1730
00
26
85
1733
00
17
85
1734
00
01
78
1732
00
47
55
1735
00
00
62
1736
00
05
36
1737
00
08
84
1739
00
06
74
779
00
00
49
1740
00
07
90
1743
00
01
68
1742
00
06
88
762
00
00
84
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4583
1744
00
08
34
1763
00
01
46
1749
00
04
38
1750
00
06
29
1751
00
00
20
1752
00
00
90
1753
00
03
05
1754
00
02
71
1755
00
02
72
1756
00
02
04
1757
00
03
96
1758
00
01
02
1760
00
00
20
1759
00
06
17
BARHARWA KHURD
1295
00
09
02
Thana No:-34
1296
00
00
20
1294
00
05
89
1289
00
00
86
1291
00
01
42
1292
00
07
41
1293
00
06
80
1285
00
00
68
1284
00
05
50
1280
00
07
99
1185
00
00
27
1232
00
00
20
1279
00
08
63
1278
00
00
20
1234
00
08
20
1277
00
03
38
1275
00
03
68
1276
00
00
99
1274
00
03
34
1273
00
18
04
1236
00
01
44
1237
00
00
20
1239
00
04
17
1240
00
00
20
1272
00
02
87
1271
00
03
18
1242
00
10
84
1269
00
01
96
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4584
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1245
00
05
39
1246
00
05
27
1247
00
03
30
1248
00
03
31
1249
00
06
32
1250
00
04
76
1251
00
00
31
1252
00
00
20
1254
00
00
20
1253
00
05
36
1256
00
04
47
1255
00
00
54
1260
00
07
88
1264/1659
00
09
91
1264
00
06
13
991
00
00
82
SAROTAR
8743(Cart Track)
00
01
33
Thana No:-33
8740
00
09
59
8742
00
00
45
8741
00
03
42
8736
00
02
56
8737
00
00
70
8738
00
01
95
8739
00
00
20
8735
00
01
88
8734
00
03
04
8732
00
02
57
8731
00
12
03
8730
00
00
20
8727
00
07
79
8724
00
00
20
8726
00
07
33
8415
00
00
20
8725
00
07
42
8714
00
04
00
8417
00
00
20
8418
00
06
59
8712
00
05
39
8420
00
09
99
8119
00
00
20
8422
00
07
47
8421
00
01
51
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4585
8118
00
00
20
8425
00
00
61
8426
00
03
52
8427
00
05
77
8431-Road
00
00
20
7971
00
00
20
7970
00
01
96
7969
00
04
00
7968
00
00
20
7945
00
10
82
7943
00
00
20
7946
00
03
51
7942
00
01
58
7947
00
02
32
7941
00
02
85
7948
00
02
70
7961
00
03
48
7949
00
01
24
7950
00
00
98
7953
00
00
20
7952
00
03
71
7951
00
03
45
7954
00
04
19
7955
00
06
10
7956
00
03
01
7931
00
03
94
7906
00
00
28
7907
00
00
20
7930
00
02
07
7929
00
02
63
7908
00
00
20
7928
00
05
42
7925
00
03
17
7922
00
03
76
7921
00
01
78
7909
00
00
20
7911
00
03
10
7919
00
01
59
7913
00
00
20
7912
00
07
64
7897
00
03
39
7900
00
02
34
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4586
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
7898
00
00
40
7899
00
05
74
7980
00
00
26
7894
00
01
29
4774
00
01
58
7880
00
00
20
8000
00
06
92
7999
00
00
20
8001
00
02
02
8002
00
05
57
8017
00
00
20
8018
00
08
49
8023
00
10
81
8022
00
00
20
4607
00
05
84
4608
00
15
12
4606
00
00
20
4619
00
00
20
1313
00
00
48
1311
00
04
77
4620
00
00
20
1312
00
03
45
1310
00
00
39
1308
00
13
29
1307
00
00
32
1306
00
00
20
1305
00
09
53
1304
00
00
20
1303
00
07
94
1301
00
00
20
1300
00
00
20
1298
00
10
85
1297
00
00
20
1299
00
04
87
1296
00
05
23
4675
00
15
46
1295
00
00
20
4677
00
03
76
4678
00
02
64
4679
00
01
69
1294
00
00
52
4680
00
16
72
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4587
1138
00
04
08
931
00
09
33
934
00
00
20
925
00
02
52
933
00
13
23
936
00
00
20
937
00
00
38
924
00
32
71
916
00
00
31
949
00
03
67
990
00
02
18
991
00
07
04
998
00
05
87
999
00
03
15
997
00
00
20
1000
00
04
17
1001
00
02
93
1008
00
03
61
1003
00
03
08
1007
00
07
71
1006
00
01
39
1015
00
00
20
1006/9336
00
06
73
1016
00
01
31
1027
00
03
38
1026
00
04
48
1028
00
00
20
1025
00
03
58
1017
00
00
20
1019
00
09
27
1023
00
00
20
1021
00
00
52
1020
00
06
83
576
00
03
68
575
00
05
73
574
00
00
20
515
00
04
11
516
00
07
47
512
00
00
20
518
00
01
58
519
00
05
85
520
00
04
67
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4588
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
488
00
03
95
489
00
06
06
487
00
00
20
486
00
13
05
485
00
00
60
484
00
05
99
480
00
10
64
458
00
00
20
459
00
06
93
467
00
00
20
460
00
00
20
464
00
00
89
463
00
12
10
462
00
01
39
97-Road
00
03
15
1670
00
05
11
1668
00
06
42
1667
00
00
20
1672
00
03
64
1673
00
09
76
1674
00
02
37
1741
00
02
39
1740
00
06
78
1739
00
04
79
1745
00
00
65
1738
00
09
86
1746
00
00
71
1737
00
06
79
1736
00
00
20
1730
00
10
25
1765
00
00
20
1766
00
09
06
1729
00
03
76
1767
00
04
72
1768
00
09
26
1760
00
00
20
1759
00
07
49
1758
00
01
31
1810
00
04
56
1810/9339
00
04
26
1809
00
13
97
1808
00
06
57
1807
00
00
20
1806
00
02
23
1806/9329
00
10
38
1804
00
00
20
1803
00
21
80
1802
00
02
67
1864
00
12
67
1865
00
00
65
1862
00
06
62
1880
00
15
53
1882
00
02
52
1883
00
11
43
1884
00
00
20
1886
00
02
98
1885
00
18
75
1888
00
15
54
1891
00
01
07
1939
00
14
89
1925
00
00
53
1926
00
02
38
1927
00
02
91
1928
00
02
90
1929
00
03
65
1930
00
03
36
1933
00
02
67
1931
00
03
20
1932
00
01
04
1935
00
17
43
1922
00
09
90
1921
00
00
20
42
00
06
25
37
00
00
20
41
00
32
04
39
00
00
46
40
00
08
91
15
00
05
98
14
00
00
20
[F. No. R-25011/17/2013-OR-I]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4589
ubZ fnYyh] 5 vxLr] 2013
dk-vk-
1632-—dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slk izrhr gksrk gS fd yksd fgr esa ;g vko”;d gS fd iVuk ls eksfrgkjh vkSj csrkyiqj
rd isVªksfy;e inkFkks± ds ifjogu gsrq ftyk iwoZ paikju] jkT; fcgkj esa bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs”ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkuh
pkfg, A
vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slh ikbiykbu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, vko”;d izrhr gksrk gS fd ml Hkwfe esa ftlds Hkhrj
mDr ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkus dk izLrko gS vkSj tks bl vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa of.kZr gS] mi;ksx dk vtZu fd;k tk,(
vr% vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] iSVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbUl ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½ vf/kfu;e] 1962 ¼1962
dk 50½ dh /kkjk 3 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk iznÙk “kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] mDr Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/akdkj dk vtZu djus ds vius
vk”k; dh ?kks’k.kk djrh gSA
dksbZ O;fDr] tks mDr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa fgrc) gS] ml rkjh[k ls ftldks] Hkkjr ds jkti= esa ;Fkk&izdkf”kr bl
vf/klwpuk dh izfr;ka lk/kkj.k turk dks miyC/k djk nh tkrh gSa] bDdhl fnu ds vUnj] Hkwfe ds Hkhrj ikbiykbu fcNk, tkus gsrq
mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj ds vtZu ds fy,] Jh v:.k dqekj >k] fc-iz-ls- o l{ke izkf/kdkjh bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs”ku fyfeVsM ¼ikbiykbu
fMohtu½ iVuk] iks-vks- <syok] flikjk] ftyk iVuk] fiu % 800020] fcgkj dks fyf[kr :i eas vk{ksi Hkst ldsxkA
vuqlwph
ftyk % iwoZ paikju
jkT; % fcgkj
ekStk@xzke
losZ@Cykd@la- (IykWV la-)
lc&Mho&la-
{ks=kiQy
gsDVs;j
vkjs
oxZ ehVj
1
2
3
4
5
6
HkVkSyh;k
3749
00
30
75
Fkkuk uacj&193
3748
00
00
20
3750
00
10
55
3747
00
03
27
3746
00
00
20
3745
00
12
39
3744
00
00
20
ukSru
775
00
06
60
Fkkuk uacj&194
774
00
10
83
772
00
14
31
769
00
00
20
771
00
05
75
782
00
00
20
800
00
09
15
801
00
05
29
799
00
00
20
802
00
19
97
976
00
05
73
975
00
00
39
974
00
04
69
973
00
04
32
972
00
00
20
971
00
08
18
4590
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4591
969
00
02
97
970
00
05
09
964
00
01
63
963
00
07
77
962
00
09
49
848
00
04
99
849
00
01
47
850
00
03
65
847@1179
00
01
15
842
00
00
60
841
00
05
31
840
00
05
00
837
00
00
20
838
00
07
75
835
00
04
28
836
00
00
20
831
00
08
98
833
00
00
20
830
00
02
36
833@1195
00
01
51
832
00
05
47
427
00
00
20
426
00
05
75
436
00
07
53
435
00
00
67
438
00
18
14
439
00
00
20
440
00
05
94
442
00
13
04
441
00
00
55
422
00
20
98
417
00
00
20
418
00
01
29
419
00
00
20
421
00
13
83
420
00
00
58
493
00
10
71
494
00
00
80
495
00
10
81
496
00
00
31
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4592
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
365
00
00
47
364
00
02
77
363
00
03
40
497
00
00
36
498
00
00
20
355
00
11
39
356
00
00
20
354
00
01
76
353
00
09
56
345
00
02
03
346
00
02
85
347
00
06
16
340
00
14
14
341
00
00
20
342
00
01
74
338
00
11
87
337
00
06
40
339
00
08
21
317
00
02
65
316
00
00
20
cjok
1487
00
01
87
Fkkuk uacj&195
1488
00
00
20
1486
00
09
70
1456
00
29
94
1457
00
00
20
1458
00
00
93
1454
00
15
18
1453
00
00
20
1459
00
00
20
1455
00
00
20
1451jkLrk
00
02
43
1448
00
11
45
1449
00
04
92
1447
00
03
89
1445
00
00
85
1444
00
05
45
1443
00
00
20
1442
00
00
20
1441
00
03
09
1440
00
03
80
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4593
1439
00
01
64
1436
00
09
18
1419
00
01
80
1417
00
06
81
1416
00
00
20
1413
00
13
58
1414
00
00
20
1412
00
00
20
1386
00
02
04
1384
00
02
27
1387
00
07
26
1383
00
06
48
1380
00
05
87
1381
00
00
20
1378
00
00
20
1379
00
07
84
1356
00
00
20
1376
00
00
20
1358
00
07
08
1359
00
00
20
1360
00
05
33
1361
00
01
14
1374
00
01
53
1364
00
00
20
1362
00
07
01
1363
00
03
51
1341
00
01
59
1343
00
00
20
1339
00
13
29
1338
00
03
77
1337
00
00
20
1336
00
03
22
1335
00
03
27
1334
00
11
73
413 jkLrk
00
02
62
195
00
01
42
196
00
10
11
197
00
00
20
194
00
01
38
198
00
00
20
190
00
22
54
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4594
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
189
00
00
20
185
00
06
99
182
00
00
20
184
00
08
14
183
00
12
38
179
00
00
20
160
00
01
48
161
00
06
29
162
00
05
10
91
00
00
63
163
00
02
29
164
00
00
52
90
00
07
65
166
00
06
46
89
00
01
92
167
00
04
64
168
00
02
59
87
00
03
49
169
00
00
31
86
00
10
11
e/kqcuh
12553
00
00
83
Fkkuk uacj&176
12552
00
11
93
12551
00
00
51
12556
00
04
38
12549
00
01
08
12557
00
01
81
12562
00
00
25
12563
00
00
20
12564
00
00
20
12548
00
15
16
12547
00
00
63
12532
00
22
08
12533
00
00
20
12531
00
00
37
12527
00
00
20
12528
00
08
12
12529
00
03
59
12526
00
03
60
12525
00
01
91
12523
00
07
24
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4595
12519
00
08
96
12518
00
07
43
12516
00
00
20
12520
00
05
04
12716
00
01
33
12484
00
10
90
12718
00
00
20
12786
00
03
67
12785
00
06
72
12784
00
00
58
12783
00
09
41
12782
00
07
74
12757
00
00
20
12758
00
12
61
12759
00
00
20
12760
00
05
63
12755@15504
00
04
51
12761
00
09
44
12762
00
09
84
12764
00
00
20
12763
00
01
89
13460
00
10
57
13458
00
00
20
13459
00
05
43
13463
00
06
74
13465
00
09
87
13467
00
07
95
13470
00
00
99
13431
00
08
18
13430
00
06
01
13429
00
00
80
13428
00
04
64
13427
00
00
20
13415
00
10
00
13415@15550
00
00
20
13415@15552
00
07
89
13409
00
00
20
13416
00
03
89
13417
00
00
20
13408
00
09
74
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4596
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
13411
00
00
20
13407
00
06
39
13406
00
00
20
13504
00
04
02
13660
00
13
42
13661
00
01
23
13669
00
00
70
13668
00
10
34
13667
00
03
57
13666
00
02
33
13665
00
04
90
13692
00
00
20
13693
00
09
37
13694
00
06
17
13695
00
00
40
13687
00
00
20
13686
00
07
03
13702
00
00
20
13685
00
00
40
13731
00
06
48
13684
00
00
20
13733
00
01
77
13732
00
01
74
13734
00
04
35
13730
00
01
49
13735
00
08
20
13736
00
00
20
13737
00
01
51
14970
00
00
49
14969
00
06
57
14971
00
01
99
14968
00
05
96
14966
00
07
61
14967
00
00
20
14964
00
02
24
14965
00
06
21
14963
00
00
20
5761
00
00
78
5763
00
01
78
5762
00
08
65
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4597
5776
00
03
32
5764
00
08
16
5772@15469
00
03
83
5774
00
00
20
5773
00
02
79
5772
00
05
67
5771
00
04
82
5770
00
01
66
5775
00
04
90
5827
00
03
45
5826
00
09
16
5834
00
10
28
5832
00
00
20
5833
00
00
83
5840
00
09
53
5839
00
01
44
5841
00
07
11
5842
00
01
57
5843
00
06
51
5844
00
01
96
14907
00
00
20
14906
00
00
54
14902
00
04
53
14903
00
07
29
14904
00
03
09
13840
00
00
20
13841
00
15
86
14884
00
00
20
13842
00
00
82
13845
00
03
10
13844
00
01
66
13843
00
00
20
13846 jkLrk
00
02
37
14871 jkLrk
00
02
79
13884
00
00
77
14874
00
01
81
14858
00
03
10
14862
00
05
07
14861
00
06
68
14863
00
00
60
14860
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4598
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
14864
00
09
61
14869
00
00
20
14865
00
00
20
14868
00
03
90
14867
00
08
74
14866
00
07
90
6792
00
11
10
6795
00
00
20
6793
00
10
67
6794
00
00
45
6789 jkLrk
00
04
34
6787
00
03
48
6786
00
00
44
6788
00
10
52
6407
00
14
92
6411
00
14
78
6416
00
00
28
6418
00
05
06
6417
00
08
75
6421
00
00
20
6430
00
11
95
6429
00
05
78
6431
00
03
70
6428
00
00
32
6432
00
09
62
6427
00
07
23
6456
00
07
12
6457
00
03
02
6455
00
04
75
6458
00
08
26
6462
00
00
20
6461
00
00
91
6459
00
04
32
6460
00
03
66
6478
00
11
92
6505
00
02
31
6506
00
11
81
6507
00
14
47
6511
00
00
95
6508
00
00
96
6510
00
06
55
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4599
6509
00
04
78
6512
00
02
07
6524 jkLrk
00
04
07
6535
00
06
09
6534
00
04
50
6533
00
03
46
6532
00
01
71
6072
00
10
46
6073
00
00
20
6071
00
19
48
6079
00
00
20
6080
00
00
20
6082
00
03
15
6083
00
05
39
6070
00
00
40
6084
00
14
44
6068
00
19
91
6087
00
03
09
299
00
14
81
298
00
00
43
6089
00
00
20
296
00
00
97
297
00
14
76
6091
00
00
20
6092
00
01
15
295
00
02
02
291
00
00
20
290
00
13
60
289
00
00
32
282
00
06
05
287
00
00
20
286
00
00
20
285
00
00
20
284
00
00
46
283
00
04
83
272
00
02
77
278
00
01
32
273
00
02
03
274
00
02
20
275
00
02
17
276
00
02
23
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4600
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
265
00
08
52
264
00
13
13
232
00
00
20
254
00
00
20
259
00
14
15
258
00
05
69
256
00
01
90
257
00
03
93
250
00
00
97
249
00
05
08
248
00
10
52
247
00
02
13
246
00
00
20
8617
00
29
58
8618
00
20
29
8782
00
62
18
8783
00
00
29
8784
00
04
74
8785
00
00
20
8787
00
13
42
8788
00
60
06
8789 fQYM psuy
00
01
83
8790
00
35
92
8791
00
18
28
8792 ukyk
00
02
04
8847
00
06
49
8848 ukyk
00
04
58
8846
00
01
95
8849
00
06
47
8850
00
16
47
8851
00
00
87
47
00
05
41
46
00
00
20
48
00
07
30
49
00
04
30
50
00
00
20
51
00
00
20
52
00
09
67
53
00
09
43
54
00
03
55
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4601
59
00
14
13
60
00
12
01
63
00
11
44
64
00
07
41
65
00
09
88
66
00
14
98
67
00
00
20
93 ukyk
00
06
09
235
00
20
10
236
00
00
20
240
00
00
90
241
00
21
68
238
00
00
20
239
00
00
30
242
00
08
73
266 jkLrk
00
01
94
¹iQk- la- vkj&25011@17@2013&vksvkj&Iº
iou oqQekj] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 5th August, 2013
S.O. 1632.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest
that a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited in Dist. East Champaran in the State of Bihar
for ‘Patna to Motihari and Baitalpur Pipeline’ for the transportation of Petroleum Product;
And, whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is
necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which
is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and
Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby
declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the
date on which the copies of the notification issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as
published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of
the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land, to Shri Arun Kumar Jha, B.A.S. & Competent
Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited. (Pipelines Division) P.O. Dhelwan, Sipara, Dist. Patna (Bihar) Pin –
800020.
SCHEDULE
Dist.: Purba Champaran
State : Bihar
Mouja / Village
Survey/BlockNo.
Sub-Div-No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
BHATAULIYA
3749
00
30
75
Thana No.-193
3748
00
00
20
3750
00
10
55
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4602
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
3747
00
03
27
3746
00
00
20
3745
00
12
39
3744
00
00
20
NAUTAN
775
00
06
60
Thana No.-194
774
00
10
83
772
00
14
31
769
00
00
20
771
00
05
75
782
00
00
20
800
00
09
15
801
00
05
29
799
00
00
20
802
00
19
97
976
00
05
73
975
00
00
39
974
00
04
69
973
00
04
32
972
00
00
20
971
00
08
18
969
00
02
97
970
00
05
09
964
00
01
63
963
00
07
77
962
00
09
49
848
00
04
99
849
00
01
47
850
00
03
65
847/1179
00
01
15
842
00
00
60
841
00
05
31
840
00
05
00
837
00
00
20
838
00
07
75
835
00
04
28
836
00
00
20
831
00
08
98
833
00
00
20
830
00
02
36
833/1195
00
01
51
832
00
05
47
427
00
00
20
426
00
05
75
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4603
436
00
07
53
435
00
00
67
438
00
18
14
439
00
00
20
440
00
05
94
442
00
13
04
441
00
00
55
422
00
20
98
417
00
00
20
418
00
01
29
419
00
00
20
421
00
13
83
420
00
00
58
493
00
10
71
494
00
00
80
495
00
10
81
496
00
00
31
365
00
00
47
364
00
02
77
363
00
03
40
497
00
00
36
498
00
00
20
355
00
11
39
356
00
00
20
354
00
01
76
353
00
09
56
345
00
02
03
346
00
02
85
347
00
06
16
340
00
14
14
341
00
00
20
342
00
01
74
338
00
11
87
337
00
06
40
339
00
08
21
317
00
02
65
316
00
00
20
BARWA
1487
00
01
87
Thana No.-195
1488
00
00
20
1486
00
09
70
1456
00
29
94
1457
00
00
20
1458
00
00
93
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4604
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1454
00
15
18
1453
00
00
20
1459
00
00
20
1455
00
00
20
1451 (ROAD)
00
02
43
1448
00
11
45
1449
00
04
92
1447
00
03
89
1445
00
00
85
1444
00
05
45
1443
00
00
20
1442
00
00
20
1441
00
03
09
1440
00
03
80
1439
00
01
64
1436
00
09
18
1419
00
01
80
1417
00
06
81
1416
00
00
20
1413
00
13
58
1414
00
00
20
1412
00
00
20
1386
00
02
04
1384
00
02
27
1387
00
07
26
1383
00
06
48
1380
00
05
87
1381
00
00
20
1378
00
00
20
1379
00
07
84
1356
00
00
20
1376
00
00
20
1358
00
07
08
1359
00
00
20
1360
00
05
33
1361
00
01
14
1374
00
01
53
1364
00
00
20
1362
00
07
01
1363
00
03
51
1341
00
01
59
1343
00
00
20
1339
00
13
29
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4605
1338
00
03
77
1337
00
00
20
1336
00
03
22
1335
00
03
27
1334
00
11
73
413 (ROAD)
00
02
62
195
00
01
42
196
00
10
11
197
00
00
20
194
00
01
38
198
00
00
20
190
00
22
54
189
00
00
20
185
00
06
99
182
00
00
20
184
00
08
14
183
00
12
38
179
00
00
20
160
00
01
48
161
00
06
29
162
00
05
10
91
00
00
63
163
00
02
29
164
00
00
52
90
00
07
65
166
00
06
46
89
00
01
92
167
00
04
64
168
00
02
59
87
00
03
49
169
00
00
31
86
00
10
11
MADHUBANI
12553
00
00
83
Thana No.-176
12552
00
11
93
12551
00
00
51
12556
00
04
38
12549
00
01
08
12557
00
01
81
12562
00
00
25
12563
00
00
20
12564
00
00
20
12548
00
15
16
12547
00
00
63
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4606
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
12532
00
22
08
12533
00
00
20
12531
00
00
37
12527
00
00
20
12528
00
08
12
12529
00
03
59
12526
00
03
60
12525
00
01
91
12523
00
07
24
12519
00
08
96
12518
00
07
43
12516
00
00
20
12520
00
05
04
12716
00
01
33
12484
00
10
90
12718
00
00
20
12786
00
03
67
12785
00
06
72
12784
00
00
58
12783
00
09
41
12782
00
07
74
12757
00
00
20
12758
00
12
61
12759
00
00
20
12760
00
05
63
12755/15504
00
04
51
12761
00
09
44
12762
00
09
84
12764
00
00
20
12763
00
01
89
13460
00
10
57
13458
00
00
20
13459
00
05
43
13463
00
06
74
13465
00
09
87
13467
00
07
95
13470
00
00
99
13431
00
08
18
13430
00
06
01
13429
00
00
80
13428
00
04
64
13427
00
00
20
13415
00
10
00
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4607
13415/15550
00
00
20
13415/15552
00
07
89
13409
00
00
20
13416
00
03
89
13417
00
00
20
13408
00
09
74
13411
00
00
20
13407
00
06
39
13406
00
00
20
13504
00
04
02
13660
00
13
42
13661
00
01
23
13669
00
00
70
13668
00
10
34
13667
00
03
57
13666
00
02
33
13665
00
04
90
13692
00
00
20
13693
00
09
37
13694
00
06
17
13695
00
00
40
13687
00
00
20
13686
00
07
03
13702
00
00
20
13685
00
00
40
13731
00
06
48
13684
00
00
20
13733
00
01
77
13732
00
01
74
13734
00
04
35
13730
00
01
49
13735
00
08
20
13736
00
00
20
13737
00
01
51
14970
00
00
49
14969
00
06
57
14971
00
01
99
14968
00
05
96
14966
00
07
61
14967
00
00
20
14964
00
02
24
14965
00
06
21
14963
00
00
20
5761
00
00
78
5763
00
01
78
5762
00
08
65
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4608
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
5776
00
03
32
5764
00
08
16
5772/15469
00
03
83
5774
00
00
20
5773
00
02
79
5772
00
05
67
5771
00
04
82
5770
00
01
66
5775
00
04
90
5827
00
03
45
5826
00
09
16
5834
00
10
28
5832
00
00
20
5833
00
00
83
5840
00
09
53
5839
00
01
44
5841
00
07
11
5842
00
01
57
5843
00
06
51
5844
00
01
96
14907
00
00
20
14906
00
00
54
14902
00
04
53
14903
00
07
29
14904
00
03
09
13840
00
00
20
13841
00
15
86
14884
00
00
20
13842
00
00
82
13845
00
03
10
13844
00
01
66
13843
00
00
20
13846-Road
00
02
37
14871-Road
00
02
79
13884
00
00
77
14874
00
01
81
14858
00
03
10
14862
00
05
07
14861
00
06
68
14863
00
00
60
14860
00
00
20
14864
00
09
61
14869
00
00
20
14865
00
00
20
14868
00
03
90
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4609
14867
00
08
74
14866
00
07
90
6792
00
11
10
6795
00
00
20
6793
00
10
67
6794
00
00
45
6789-Road
00
04
34
6787
00
03
48
6786
00
00
44
6788
00
10
52
6407
00
14
92
6411
00
14
78
6416
00
00
28
6418
00
05
06
6417
00
08
75
6421
00
00
20
6430
00
11
95
6429
00
05
78
6431
00
03
70
6428
00
00
32
6432
00
09
62
6427
00
07
23
6456
00
07
12
6457
00
03
02
6455
00
04
75
6458
00
08
26
6462
00
00
20
6461
00
00
91
6459
00
04
32
6460
00
03
66
6478
00
11
92
6505
00
02
31
6506
00
11
81
6507
00
14
47
6511
00
00
95
6508
00
00
96
6510
00
06
55
6509
00
04
78
6512
00
02
07
6524-Road
00
04
07
6535
00
06
09
6534
00
04
50
6533
00
03
46
6532
00
01
71
6072
00
10
46
6073
00
00
20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4610
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
6071
00
19
48
6079
00
00
20
6080
00
00
20
6082
00
03
15
6083
00
05
39
6070
00
00
40
6084
00
14
44
6068
00
19
91
6087
00
03
09
299
00
14
81
298
00
00
43
6089
00
00
20
296
00
00
97
297
00
14
76
6091
00
00
20
6092
00
01
15
295
00
02
02
291
00
00
20
290
00
13
60
289
00
00
32
282
00
06
05
287
00
00
20
286
00
00
20
285
00
00
20
284
00
00
46
283
00
04
83
272
00
02
77
278
00
01
32
273
00
02
03
274
00
02
20
275
00
02
17
276
00
02
23
265
00
08
52
264
00
13
13
232
00
00
20
254
00
00
20
259
00
14
15
258
00
05
69
256
00
01
90
257
00
03
93
250
00
00
97
249
00
05
08
248
00
10
52
247
00
02
13
246
00
00
20
8617
00
29
58
8618
00
20
29
8782
00
62
18
8783
00
00
29
8784
00
04
74
8785
00
00
20
8787
00
13
42
8788
00
60
06
8789-F.C.
00
01
83
8790
00
35
92
8791
00
18
28
8792-Nala
00
02
04
8847
00
06
49
8848-Nala
00
04
58
8846
00
01
95
8849
00
06
47
8850
00
16
47
8851
00
00
87
47
00
05
41
46
00
00
20
48
00
07
30
49
00
04
30
50
00
00
20
51
00
00
20
52
00
09
67
53
00
09
43
54
00
03
55
59
00
14
13
60
00
12
01
63
00
11
44
64
00
07
41
65
00
09
88
66
00
14
98
67
00
00
20
93-Nala
00
06
09
235
00
20
10
236
00
00
20
240
00
00
90
241
00
21
68
238
00
00
20
239
00
00
30
242
00
08
73
266-Road
00
01
94
[F. No. R-25011/17/2013-OR-I]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4611
4612
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Je ,oa jkstxkj ea=kky;
ubZ fnYyh] 5 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1633-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj ¯lMhdsV cSad
ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;&1] fnYyh ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 53@2011)
dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 01&07&2013 dks
çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y&12012@09@95&vkbZvkj (ch&II)º
lqefr ldykuh] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT
New Delhi, the 5th July, 2013
S.O. 1633.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 53/2011)
of the Central Government Labour Court No. 1, Delhi now
as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between
the employers in relation to the management of Syndicate
Bank and their workman, which was received by the Central
Government on 01-07-2013.
[No. L- 12012/09/95-IR(B-II)]
SUMATI SAKLANI, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE DR. R. K. YADAV, PRESIDING
OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERMENT INDUSTRIAL
TRIBUNAL NO. 1, KARKARDOOMA COURTS
COMPLEX, DELHI
I.D. No. 53/2011
The General Secretary,
Syndicate Bank Staff Union,
Mehra Chamber,
Desh Bandhu Gupta Road,
New Delhi.
. . .Claimant
Versus
The Asstt. General Manager,
Syndicate Bank, Zonal Office No. 6,
Bhagwan Dass Road,
New Delhi-110001.
. . .Management
AWARD
A clerk posted at Old Rajendar Nagar branch, New
Dethi, Syndicate Bank (in short the bank) committed
misconduct and acted preducial to the interest of the bank.
He was charge sheeted on 4-7-92. A domestic enquiry was
conducted against him. Enquiry Officer concluded that the
charges stood established against him. The Disciplinary
Authority awarded punishment of dismissal to him. He
approached Syndicate Bank Staff Union (in short the union)
for redressed of his grievances. The union raised an
industrial dispute before the Conciliation Officer. Since the
bank contested his claim, conciliation proceedings ended
into a failure. On consideration of failure report, submitted
by a conciliation Officer, the appropriate Government
referred the dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication, vide
order No. L-12012/9/95-IR(B-II), New Delhi dated 19-5-95,
with following terms :
“Whether the action of the management of Syndicate
Bank, New Delhi in dismissing Shri Brahmanand,
Clerk, from service w.e.f. 30-10-1993 is legal and
justified? If not, what relief is the said workman
entitled to?”
2. Claim statement was filed by on behalf of the
claimant, namely, Shri Brahmanand pleading that he was
appointed as a clerk by the bank in 1974. He had
unblemished record of service. A charge sheet was served
upon him on 4-7-92, which was preceded by an order of
suspension. During long period of his suspension, he was
virtually driven to starvation since huge recovery was made
by the bank from his subsistence allowance. Though he
made representation against those recoveries, yet the bank
passed an order dated 6-4-92 upholding illegal recoveries.
Since a meagre sum of subsistence allowance was paid, he
was unable to defend himself properly. His suspension
was for prolonged for a period over 20 months without any
cause or reason.
3. It has been pleaded that charge sheet contained
false allegation, which lacked material particulars.
Reasonable opportunities to defend was denied to him.
The Enquiry Officer had disallowed vital questions, which
were put to the witnesses during course of cross-
examination. The enquiry was farce. Enquiry Officer
submitted his report dated 15-7-93, which contained
perverse findings. The Disciplinary Authority imposed
punishment of dismissal. He preferred an appeal which
was dismissed by a non speaking unreasonable order dated
7-5-94. It has been claimed that since the claimant raised a
voice against his superior officers, he was made a
scapegoat. The domestic action nowhere answers
standards of principles of natural justice. It has been
claimed that his dismissal may be declared illegal and he
may be reinstated in service with continuity, full back wages
and all consequential benefits.
4. Claim was demurred by the bank pleading that the
claimant committed grave misconducts while posted at
Rajendar Nagar branch of the bank, when he was entrusted
with duties of a special assistant on temporary basis from
time to time. Charge sheet dated 4-7-92 was served upon
him. It has been pleaded that subsistence allowance was
paid to the claimant, in accordance with rules. The claimant
had taken advances and there was contract between the
bank and the claimant to make recoveries of dues from him,
hence those recoveries were effected from his subsistence
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4613
allowance. The recoveries where consonance with terms
of the contract, entered into between the parties. The
claimant cannot allege that those recoveries were not
justified. Due opportunities were accorded to the claimant
to defend himself before the Enquiry Officer. The Enquiry
Officer observed principles of natural justice, during the
conduct of the enquiry. All opportunities were accorded to
the claimant to defend himself. He was represented by an
office bearer of the union before the Enquiry Officer, who
conducted his defence diligently. Charges stood proved
before the Enquiry Officer and he submitted his report dated
15-7-93 to the Disciplinary Authority. The Disciplinary
Authority concurred with the report of Enquiry Officer and
proposed a punishment of dismissal. After giving a personal
hearing to the claimant, punishment of dismissal was
awarded to him, vide order dated 30-10-93. Appeal preferred
by the claimant, also came to be dismissed. The bank pleads
that punishment awarded to the claimant commensurate
with his misconduct. The claimant is not entitled to any
relief muchless the relief of reinstatement with continuity,
full back wages and all consequential benefits.
5. On pleadings of the parties, following issues were
settled :
(i) Whether the domestic enquiry conducted against
the workman is fair and proper?
(ii) As in terms of reference.
6. The case was transferred to the Central Govt.
Industrial Tribunal No. 2, New Delhi, for adjudication by
the appropriate Govt., vide order No. Z-22019/6/2007-IR
(C-II), New Delhi dated 11-02-2008. Vide order No. Z-22019/
6/2007 -IR(C-II), New Delhi dated 30-03-2011, the case was
re-transferred by the appropriate Government to this
Tribunal for adjudication.
7. On consideration of facts testified by the claimant
and those detailed by Shri Laxmi Narain, Manager, the
Tribunal answered the preliminary issue on the virus of
enquiry in favour of the bank and against the claimant,
vide order dated 20-6-2011.
8. Arguments were heard on proportionality of
punishment. Shri M.A.Khan, authorized representatives,
advanced arguments on behalf of the claimant. Shri Rajesh
Mahendru, authorized representatives, raised his
submissions on behalf of the bank. I have given my careful
considerations to the arguments advanced at the bar and
cautiously perused the record. My. findings on issues
involved in the controversy are as follows :
Issue No. 2
9. Prior to introduction of section 11A of the Act,
adjudicatory powers of the Tribunal were articulated in
Buckingham & Carnatic Company [1951 (2) LLJ 314]. Four
standards were delineated by the Labour Appellate
Tribunal in the above case to render managerial right of
taking disciplinary action vulnerable, namely, (i) where there
is a want of bonafides or (ii) when it is a case of victimization
or unfair labour practice or violation of the principles of
natural justice; or (iii) when there is basic error of facts, or
(iv) when there has been a perverse finding on the materials.
This articulation was adopted by the Apex Court with slight
modification in Indian Iron and Steel Company Limited
[1958 (1) LLJ 260], without any acknowledgement to the
precedent in Buckingham & Carnatic case (supra), wherein
it was ruled that the power of the management to direct its
own internal administration and discipline was not unlimited
and liable to be interfered with by industrial adjudication
when a dispute arises to see whether termination of services
of a workman is justified and to give appropriate relief.
However, it was announced that the jurisdiction of an
Industrial Tribunal to interfere with the managerial
prerogative of taking disciplinary action is not of appellate
nature as the legislature has not chosen to confer such
jurisdiction upon it. Hence Tribunal could not substitute
its own judgement for that of the management. The Court
laid down that in the following circumstances an industrial
adjudicator can interfere with the disciplinary action taken
by the employer : (1) when there is want of good faith,
(2) when there was victimization or unfair labour practice,
(3) when the management had been guilty of a basic error
or violation of the principles of natural justice, or (4) when
on the materials, the finding was completely baseless or
perverse.
10. Enunciation (1) and (2), referred above, are
addressed to the bona-fides of the employer in initiating
the action and inflicting the punishment, while postulates
(3) and (4) are addressed to domestic enquiry. Therefore,
an employer is required to act bona-fide in initiating
disciplinary action as well as in inflicting the punishment.
In initiating the action, the alleged act of misconduct should
not be a ruse for something else, such as the trade union
activities of the workman or employers dislike of him for
some personal reasons. The action should not be motivated
by vindictiveness or ulterior purpose, so as to smack for
victimization or unfair labour practice. Likewise in the matter
of inflicting punishment, the employer should act fairly.
In case punishment awarded is so shockingly dis-
proportionate to the act of the misconduct, as no
reasonable man would ever impose that itself may lead to
an inference of malafides, victimization or unfair labour
practice. In holding enquiry, the Enquiry Officer must
comply with the rules of natural justice. He must not be a
biased person and give reasonable opportunity to both
sides for being heard. His findings should not be baseless
or perverse.
11. In Ramswarth Sinha (1954 L.A.C. 697) the Labour
Appellate Tribunal recognized the right of the management
to ask for permission to adduce evidence before the Tribunal
to justify its action in a "no enquiry" case. Following that
proposition the Apex Court equated the cases of "defective
4614
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
enquiry" with "no enquiry" cases and ruled that in either
cases, the Tribunal have jurisdiction to go into the merits
of the case on the basis of evidence adduced before it by
the parties. Reference can be made to the precedent in
Motipur Sugar Factory Pvt. Ltd. [1965 (2) LLJ 162] where
the employer had held no enquiry at all before the dismissal
and, therefore, adduced evidence to justify its action before
the Tribunal,which decision was upheld. The Apex Court
discarded the plea on behalf of the workman that since no
enquiry at all had been held by the employer, it had no right
to adduce evidence to justify its stand before the Tribunal.
In Ritz Theatre [1962 (II) LLJ 498] it was ruled by the Supreme
Court that the Tribunal would be justified to go to the
merits of the case and decide for itself on the basis of the
evidence adduced whether the charges have indeed been
made out. It announced that it would neither be fair to the
management nor fair to the workman himself in such a case
that the Tribunal should refuse to take the evidence and
thereby drive the management to pass through the whole
process of holding the enquiry all over again. Reference
can also be made to the precedent in Bharat Sugar Mills
Ltd. [1961 (11) LLJ 644].
12. In Delhi Cloth and General Mills Company [1972
(1) LLJ 180], Apex Court considered the catena of decisions
over the subject and laid down the following principles :
“(1) If no domestic enquiry had been held by the
management, or if the management makes it clear
that it does not rely upon any domestic enquiry that
may have been held by it, it is entitled to straightaway
adduce evidence before the Tribunal justifying its
action. The Tribunal is bound to consider that
evidence so adduced before it, on merits, and give a
decision thereon. In such a case, it is not necessary
for the Tribunal to consider the validity of the
domestic enquiry as the employer himself does not
rely on it.
(2) If a domestic enquiry had been held, it is open to
the management to rely upon the domestic enquiry
held by it, in the first instance, and alternatively and
without prejudice to its plea that the enquiry is proper
and binding, simultaneously adduce additional
evidence before the Tribunal justifying its action. In
such a case no inference can be drawn, without
anything more, that the management has given up
the enquiry conducted by it.
(3) When the management relies on the enquiry
conducted by it, and also simultaneously adduces
evidence before the Tribunal, without prejudice to
its plea that the enquiry proceedings are proper, it is
the duty of the Tribunal, in the first instance, to
consider whether the enquiry proceedings
conducted by the management, are valid and proper.
If the Tribunal is satisfied that the enquiry
proceedings have been held properly and are valid,
the question of considering the evidence adduced
before it on merits, no longer survives. It is only
when the holds that the enquiry proceedings have
not been properly held, that it derives jurisdiction to
deal with the merits of the dispute and in such a case
it has to consider the evidence adduced before it by
the management and decide the matter on the basis
of such evidence.
(4) When the domestic enquiry has been held by the
management and the management relies on the same,
it is open to the latter to request the Tribunal to try
the validity of the domestic enquiry as a preliminary
issue and also ask for an opportunity to adduce
evidence before the Tribunal, if the finding on the
preliminary issue is against the management.
However, elaborate and cumbersome the procedure
may be, under such circumstances, it is open to the
Tribunal to deal, in the first instance, as a preliminary
issue the validity of the domestic enquiry. If its
finding on the preliminary issue is in favour of the
management, then no additional evidence need be
cited by the management. But, if the finding on the
preliminary issue is against the management, the
Tribunal will have to give the employer an
opportunity to cite additional evidence and also give
a similar opportunity to the employee to lead evidence
contra, as the request to adduce evidence had been
made by the management to the Tribunal during the
course of the proceedings and before the trial has
come to an end. When the preliminary issue is decided
against the management and the latter leads evidence
before the Tribunal, the position, under such
circumstances, will be, that the management is
deprived of the benefit of having the finding of the
domestic Tribunal being accepted as prima facie proof
of the alleged misconduct. On the other hand, the
management will have to prove, by adducing proper
evidence, that the workman is guilty of misconduct
and that the action taken by it is proper. It will not be
just and fair either to the management or to the
workman that the Tribunal should refuse to take
evidence and thereby ask the management to take a
further application, after holding a proper enquiry,
and deprive the workman of the benefit of the
Tribunal itself being satisfied, on evidence adduced
before it, that he was or was not guilty of the alleged
misconduct.
(5) The management has got a right to attempt to
sustain its order by adducing independent evidence
before the Tribunal. But the management should avail
itself of the said opportunity by making a suitable
request to the Tribunal before the proceedings are
closed. If no such opportunity has been available of,
or asked for by the management, before the
proceedings are closed, the employer can make no
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4615
grievance that the Tribunal did not provide such an
opportunity. The Tribunal will have before it only
the enquiry proceedings and it has to decide whether
the proceedings have been held properly and the
findings recorded therein are also proper.
(6) If the employer relies only on the domestic enquiry
and does not simultaneously lead additional
evidence or ask for an opportunity during the
pendency of the proceedings to adduce such
evidence, the duty of the Tribunal is only to consider
the validity of the domestic enquiry as well as the
finding recorded therein and decide the matter. If the
Tribunal decides that the domestic enquiry has not
been held properly, it is not its function to invite suo
moto the employer to adduce evidence before it to
justify the action taken by it.
(7) The above principles apply to the proceedings
before the Tribunal, which have come before it either
on a reference under Section 10 or by way of an
application under Section 33 of the Act.
13. Keeping in view the proposition laid by the Apex
Court in Delhi Cloth and General Mills Company (supra),
the Parliament inserted Section 11-A in the Act, which came
into force w.e.f. 15th of December,1971. In the statement of
objects and reasons for inserting Section 11-A, it was
stated:
"In Indian Iron and Steel Company Limited and
Another Vs. Their Workmen (AIR 1958 S.C. 130 at
p.138), the Supreme Court, while considering the
Tribunal's power to interfere with the management's
decision to dismiss, discharge or terminate the
services of a workman, has observed that in case of
dismissal on misconduct, the Tribunal does not
act as a court of appeal and substitute its own
judgment for that of the management and that the
Tribunal will interfere only when there is want of
good faith, victimization, unfair labour practice, etc.,
on the part of the management.
2. The International Labour Organisation, in its
recommendation (No.119) concerning 'Termination
of employment at the initiative of the employer'
adopted in June, 1963, has recommended that a
worker aggrieved by the termination of his
employment should be entitled to appeal against the
termination among others, to a neutral body such as
an arbitrator, a court, an arbitration committee or a
similar body and that the neutral body concerned
should be empowered to examine the reasons given
in the termination of employment and the other
circumstances relating to the case and to render a
decision on the justification of the termination.
The International Labour Organisation has further
recommended that the neutral body should be
empowered (if it finds that the termination of
employment was unjustified) to order that the worker
concerned, unless reinstated with unpaid wages,
should be paid adequate compensation or afforded
some other relief.
3. In accordance with these recommendations, it is
considered that theTribunal's power in an
adjudication proceeding relating to discharge or
dismissal of a workman should not be limited and
that the Tribunal should have the power, in cases
wherever necessary to set aside the order of
discharge or dismissal and direct reinstatement of
the workman on such terms and conditions, if any,
as it thinks fit or give such other reliefs to the
workman including the award of any lesser
punishment in lieu of discharge or dismissal as the
circumstances of the case may require. For this
purpose, a new Section 11-A is proposed to be
inserted in the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947......’’.
14. After insertion of Section 11-A, the Apex Court
summed up the law in the case of Firestone Tyre and
Rubber Company [1973 (1) LLJ 278] in the following
propositions :
"(1) The right to take disciplinary action and to decide
upon the quantum of punishment are mainly
managerial functions, but if a dispute is referred to a
Tribunal, the latter has power to see if action of the
employer is justified.
(2) Before imposing the punishment, as employer is
expected to conduct a proper enquiry in accordance
with the provisions of the Standing Orders, if
applicable, and principles of natural justice. The
enquiry should not be an empty formality.
(3) When a proper enquiry has been held by an
employer, and the finding of misconduct is a plausible
conclusion flowing from the evidence, adduced at
the said enquiry, the Tribunal has no jurisdiction to
sit in judgement over the decision of the employer as
an appellate body. The interference with the decision
of the employer will be justified only when the
findings arrived at in the enquiry are perverse or the
management is guilty of victimization, unfair labour
practice or mala fide.
(4) Even if no enquiry has been held by an employer
or if the enquiry held by him is found to be defective,
the Tribunal in order to satisfy itself about the legality
and validity of the order, had to give an opportunity
to the employer and employee to adduce evidence
before it. It is open to the employer to adduce
evidence for the first time justifying his action, and it
is open to the employee to adduce evidence contra.
4616
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(5) The effect of an employer not holding an enquiry
is that the Tribunal would not have to consider only
whether there was a prima facie case. On the other
hand, the issue about the merits of the impugned
order of dismissal or discharge is at large before the
Tribunal and the latter, on the evidence adduced
before it, has to decide for itself whether the
misconduct alleged is proved. In such cases, the
point about the exercise of managerial functions
does not arise at all. A case of defective enquiry
stands on the same footing as no enquiry.
(6) The Tribunal gets jurisdiction to consider the
evidence placed before it for the first time in
justification of the action taken only, if no enquiry
has been held or after the enquiry conducted by an
employer is found to be defective.
(7) It has never been recognized that the Tribunal
should straightaway, without anything more, direct
reinstatement of a dismissed or discharged employee,
once it is found that no domestic enquiry has been
held or the said enquiry is found to be defective.
(8) An employer, who wants to avail himself of the
opportunity of adducing evidence for the first time
before the Tribunal to justify his action, should ask
for it at the appropriate stage. If such an opportunity
is asked for, the Tribunal has no power to refuse.
The giving of an opportunity to an employer to
adduce evidence for the first time before the Tribunal
is in the interest of both the management and the
employee and to enable the Tribunal itself to be
satisfied about the alleged misconduct.
(9) Once the misconduct is proved either in the
enquiry conducted by an employer or by the evidence
placed before a Tribunal for the first time, punishment
imposed cannot, be interfered with by the Tribunal
except in cases where the punishment is so harsh as
to suggest victimization.
(10) In a particular case, after setting aside the order
of dismissal, whether a workman should be re-
instated or paid compensation is, as held by this
Court in The Management of Panitole Tea Estate Vs.
The workmen, within the judicial decision of a Labour
Court or Tribunal".
15. Jurisdiction to interfere with the punishment is
also not confined to the case where punishment is
shockingly disproportionate to the act of the misconduct.
The Tribunal has power of substituting its own measure of
punishment in place of managerial wisdom. Change in legal
position, post introduction of Section 11A of the Act has
been effectively summarized in the case of Ambassador
Sky Chef (1996 Lab. I.C. 299) wherein High Court of Bombay
observed that the section gives specifically two fold powers
to an industrial adjudicator : firstly, it is a virtual power of
appeal against the findings of fact made by the Enquiry
Officer in his report with regard to the adequacy of the
evidence and conclusion on facts, and secondly, and far
more important, it is the power of re-appraisal of quantum
of punishment. Now no restriction lies on an industrial
adjudicator to interfere with the enquiry only on four
grounds, referred above. However, wide discretionary
powers with the adjudicator are to be exercised in judicial
and judicious manner before it interferes with the order of
misconduct or punishment.
16.With this prelude, now I would turn to facts of the
present controversy. As emerged out of the order dated
20-6-2011, the Tribunal had considered the factum of
service of charge-sheet on the claimant, calling upon him
to submit his statement of defence. It was also taken note
of that the chare-sheet was specific and unambiguous.
Enquiry Officer called upon the claimant to putforth his
case. Opportunities were accorded to the claimant to defend
himself in the enquiry. Therefore, it is evident that the issues
relating to bonafides of the bank and according opportunity
of being heard were addressed to and found against the
claimant. Issue relating to perversity of report of the Enquiry
Officer was also answered against him. Thus it is evident
that all issues, except issue relating to proportionality of
punishment, were adjudicated against the claimant.
17. As record projects, charge-sheet dated 04-07-1992
was served, wherein it is detailed that the claimant passed
for cheques on various dates pertaining to SB A/c 35835
even though he was not working in SB Dept. and not
empowered to pass those cheques independently. The
claimant unauthorisedly parted with an amount of Rs. 1.00
lakh on 15-3-92 out of a cash of Rs. 2,70,000 and paid that
amount unathorisedly to the bearer of cheque No. 077225,
at the service counter. The claimant had tampered with the
records of the branch on 15-3-92 and made a fictitious entry
in the SB Ledger folio of SB A/c 35835 with a malafied
intention of making available an amount of Rs.1.50 lakh to
the party, for which amount they were not entitled. The
claimant further debited a cheque, referred above, for
Rs.1.00 lakh and verified signatures of the party, for which
act he was not empowered to do so.
18. On these charges the Enquiry Officer recorded
his report dated 15-7-1993 wherein he concluded that all
charges stood proved against the claimant. It would be in
the fitness of things to extract conclusions arrived at by
the Enquiry Officer which are reproduced thus :—
"Findings :
"I therefore, hold the CSE guilty of :
(i) having passed a cheque without authority;
(ii) having inflated the balance in the account
No. 35835 with malafide motives.
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4617
(iii) passing a cheque against such inflated balance
without having the authority/jurisdiction over the
account.
(iv) having parted with the cash at the Extension
Counter without authonty.
Therefore, it is clearly established that the CSE is
guilty of gross misconduct of doing acts prejudicial
to the interest of the Bank under Clause No. 19.5 (j)
of Bipartite Settlement- 1966”.
19. During the course of arguments it was urged that
punishment of dismissal from service was proposed on the
claimant and show-cause notice was given. After giving
personal hearing, punishment of dismissal was, awarded
to the claimant vide order dated 30-10-1993. The bank
presents that the punishment of dismissal commensurate
to his misconduct. On the other hand claimant argues that
no pecuniary loss was caused to the bank, since money
was recovered from the party. He agitates that his long
unblemished service was not taken into consideration and
punishment is shockingly disproportionate to his
misconduct.
20. After insertion of Section 11-A of the Act, the
jurisdiction to interfere with the punishment is there with
the Tribunal, who has to see whether punishment imposed
by the employer commensurate with the gravity of the act
of misconduct. If it comes to the conclusion that the
misconduct is proved, it may still hold that the punishment
is not justified because misconduct alleged and proved is
such as it does not warrant punishment of discharge or
dismissal and where necessary, set aside the order of
discharge or dismissal and direct reinstatement with or
without any terms or conditions as it thinks fit or give any
other relief, including the award of lessor punishment, in
lieu of discharge or dismissal, as the circumstance of the
case may warrant. Reference can be made to a precedent in
Sanatak Singh (1984 Lab. I.C. 817). The discretion to award
punishment lesser than the punishment of discharge or
dismissal has to be judiciously exercised and the Tribunal
can interfere only when it is satisfied that the punishment
imposed by the management is highly disproportionate to
the decree of the guilt of the workman. Reference can be
made to the precedent in Kachraji Motiji Parmar [1994 (II)
LLJ 332]. Thus it is evident that the Tribunal has now
jurisdiction and power of substituting its own measure of
punishment in place of the managerial wisdom, once it is
satisfied that the order of discharge or dismissal is not
justified. On facts and in the circumstances of a case,
section 11A of the Act specifically gives two folds powers
to the Industrial Tribunal, first is virtually the power of
appeal against findings of fact made by the Enquiry Officer
in his report with regard to the adequacy of the evidence
and the conclusion on facts and secondly of foremost
importance, is the power of reappraisal of quantum of
punishment.
21. Power to set aside order of discharge or dismissal
and grant relief of reinstatement or lesser punishment is
not untramaled power. This power has to be exercised only
when Tribunal is satisfied that the order of discharge or
dismissal was not justified. This satisfaction of the
Tribunal is objective satisfaction and not subjective one.
It involves application of the mind by the Tribunal to
various circumstances like nature of delinquency committed
by the workman, his past conduct, impact of delinquency
on employer's business, besides length of service rendered
by him. Furthermore, the Tribunal has to consider whether
the decision taken by the employer is just or not. Only after
taking into consideration these aspects, the Tribunal can
upset the punishment imposed by the employer. The
quantum of punishment cannot be interfered with without
recording specific findings on points referred above. No
indulgence is to be granted to a person, who is guilty of
grave misconduct like cheating, fraud, misappropriation of
employers fund, theft of public property etc. A reference
can be made to the precedent in Bhagirath Mal Rainwa
[1995 (1) LLJ 960].
22. An employer would expect loyalty towards him
from his employee. In other words, the employee is expected
to promote interest of his employer in connection with the
job for which he has been engaged. Contract of an
employment engrafts a stipulation that the employee should
serve his master with good faith and fidelity. When an
employee makes a false record or document with a view to
deceive his employer, he commits an act of dishonesty or
fraud. When false entries are made in official records,
certifying an amount existing in the account of a party
more than what it has, in fact the employee forges the
record, deceives his employer and commits serious acts of
dishonesty and fraud. As detailed above, the claimant
recorded false entry in saving bank account No. 35835
maintained by Smt. Manju Goyal and projected that an
amount of Rs. 150571.78 was lying therein, while in fact
there was a balance of Rs. 571.78 only in that account as on
15-3-92. The claimant committed a very grave misconduct.
He also passed cheque of Rs. 26000 without any authority.
Chque of Rs. 1 lakh was passed by him against the inflected
balance in the account of Smt. Manju Goyal, without an
authority. He parted with the cash of Rs.1 lakh at the
extension counter without any authority. All these facts
make it clear that misconduct committed by the claimant
was of alasming nature, justifying penalty of dismissal.
Punishment awarded to the claimant cannot be termed as
disproportionate to his misconduct. By no stretch of
imagination the punishment can be termed as arbitrary, an
act of unfair labour practice an victimization. I conclude
that punishment awarded to the claimant is reasonable and
justified. He is not entitled to any relief much less the relief
of reinstatement in service with continuity, full back
wages and all consequential benefits. His claim is discarded.
An award is passed in favour of the bank and against the
4618
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
claimant/union. It be sent to the appropriate Govt. for
publication.
Dr. R. K.YADAV, Presiding Officer
Dated : 29-11-2012
ubZ fnYyh] 5 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1634-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj vksfj;.Vy cSad
vkWiQ dkWelZ ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa
ds chp vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj
vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;&1] fnYyh ds iapkV (lanHkZ
la[;k 282@2011) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks
01&07&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y&12012@59@2005&vkbZvkj (ch&II)º
lqefr ldykuh] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 5th July, 2013
S.O. 1634.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 282/
2011) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour
Court No. 1, Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the
industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to
the management of Oriental Bank of Commerce and their
workman, which was received by the Central Government
on 01-07-2013.
[No. L- 12012/59/2005-IR(B-II)]
SUMATI SAKLANI, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE DR. R. K. YADAV, PRESIDING
OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERMENT INDUSTRIAL
TRIBUNAL NO. 1, KARKARDOOMA COURTS
COMPLEX, DELHI
I.D. No. 282/2011
Shri Hari Om S/o Sh.Chanda Ram,
H. No.507-L, Model Town,
Balmiki Basti, Badi Market,
Karnal, Haryana ....Workman
Versus
The Deputy General Manager,
Oriental Bank of Commerce,
Regional Office,
Karnal, Haryana ....Management
AWARD
A personal driver was employed by the Deputy
General Manager, posted at Regional Office, Karnal,
Haryana, Oriental Bank of Commerce (in short the bank).
The personal driver used to drive vehicle No.HR-05J-0841,
which vehicle was owned by the bank. He served the
Deputy General Manager till 6-2-04, the date when the
latter was transferred from Karnal to some other place. His
services came to an end, at that juncture. Since the personal
driver belaboured under a belief that he was an employee
of the bank, he raised a demand on the bank for
reinstatement of his services. Since his demand was not
conceded to, he raised an industrial dispute before the
Conciliation Officer. The bank contested his claim and as
such conciliation proceedings ended into a failure. On
consideration of failure report, submitted by Conciliation
Officer, the appropriate Govt. referred the dispute to this
Tribunal for adjudication, vide order No. L-12012/59/2005-
IR(B-II), New Delhi, dated 09-08-2005 with following terms:
"Whether the action of the management of Oriental
Bank of Commerce in terminating the services of
Hari Om S/o Sh.Chanda Ram, Driver w.e.f. 6-2-2004
is just and legal? If not, what relief the concerned
workman is entitled to?"
2. Claim statement was filed by the personal driver,
namely, Shri Hari Om pleading that he was employed by
the bank at its regional office Karnal on the post of a
driver w.e.f. 1st May, 2001. Fixed salary of Rs.2700 per
month was paid to him. Duties of driving vehicle No. HR-
05J-0841 were assigned to him. He was performing his
duties under the directions of the Deputy General Manager
of the bank. Log book was usually got signed from him by
the officer, who used that vehicle. He also use to sign
various vouchers/bills, issued by the agencies at the time
of repair/service of the vehicle. He continuously served
the bank till 5-2-2004. His services were terminated
abruptly without any notice on pay in lieu thereof.
Retrenchment of his service was illegal, since retrenchment
compensation was not paid to him. Action of the bank
was violative of provisions of sections 25-F, 25-G and
25-H of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (in short the
Act). He served a legal notice on the bank, but it was not
responded to. Some other driver was appointed by the
bank in his place. He seeks reinstatement in service with
continuity and full back wages.
3. Claim was contested by the bank pleading that
the claimant was never appointed by the bank. Since
there was no relationship of employer of the employee
between the parties, there was no industrial dispute which
would be referred for adjudication. The bank presents that
the claimant was working as personal driver of
Shri A. K.Tangri, Deputy General Manager, Regional Office,
Karnal. Shri Tangri used to pay his wages. The bank
reimbursed the wages paid by Shri Tangri to the claimant,
subject to ceiling amount. fixed by the bank. The bank
does not dispute that the vehicle driven by the claimant
belong to it. Since the claimant was not an employee of
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4619
the bank, there was no question of terminating his services.
There was no occasion for the bank to give notice or pay
in lieu thereof and retrenchment compensation. Claim put
forward by Shri Hari Om is misconceived, hence it may be
dismissed, pleads the bank.
4. On pleadings of the parties, following issues were
settled by my ld. predecessor.
(i) Whether there existed relationship of employer
and employee between the parties? If so its
effect?
(ii) Whether the workmen was personal driver of
Shri A.K. Tangri, Deputy General Manager,
Regional Office, Karnal?
(iii) As in terms of reference.
5. Vide order No. Z-22019/6/2007 -IR(C-II), New Delhi,
dated 11-02-2008, appropriate Government transferred the
case to the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No.II,
New Delhi, for adjudication. Vide order No. Z-22019/6/2007-
IR(C-II), New Delhi, dated 30-03-2011, the case was re-
transferred by the appropriate Government to this Tribunal
for adjudication.
6. Claimant has examined himself in support of his
claim. Shri Rakesh Kumar Gupta, Senior Manager, was
examined by the bank. No other witness was examined by
either of the parties.
7. Arguments were heard at the bar. Shri Bhagwan
Das, authorized representative, presented facts on behalf
of the claimant. Shri Rajat Arora, authorized representative,
raised his submission on behalf of the bank. I have given
my careful considerations to the arguments advanced at
the bar and cautiously perused the records. My findings
on issues involved in the controversy are as follows :
Issue Nos.1 & 2
8. In affidavit Ex.WW1/A, tendered as evidence,
claimant swears that he was engaged as a driver by the
bank on 1-5-01. His monthly wages were Rs. 2700. He was
driving vehicle No. HR-05J-0841. He used to drive the
vehicle under the instructions of the Deputy General
Manager. Log book of the vehicle was signed by him,
besides the officer using the vehicle. His wages were paid
by the bank through vouchers. He served the bank upto
5-2-04. During the cause of his cross examination he
presents that no appointment letter was issued in his
favour. He admits that in Feb. 2004 Shri Tangri was
transferred from Karnal to some other station.
9. Shri Rakesh Kumar Gupta, unfolds in his affidavit
Ex.MW1/A, tendered as evidence, that relationship of
employer and employee never existed between the parties.
The claimant was never appointed by the bank. He was
personal driver of Shri A.K. Tangri, Deputy General
Manager, Regional Office, Karnal. He was paid his wages
by Shri Tangri. The bank used to reimburse wages paid by
Shri Tangri to the claimant, subject to ceiling amount fixed
in that regard. Vide letter dated 23-6-97, the Govt. of India
has ordered that no personal drivers shall be absorbed in
the bank on regular basis. The claimant never worked with
the bank.
10. When facts unfolded by the claimant and those
detailed by Shri Rakesh Kumar Gupta are appreciated it
came to light that the bank never engaged the claimant in
its service. No appointment letter was ever issued by the
bank in favour of the claimant. His wages were paid by
Shri Tangri. Documents Ex.WW1/1 to Ex.WW1/14 go to
re-affirm that Shri Tangri used to pay wages to the claimant.
Copies of log book, which are Ex.WW1/15 to Ex.WW1/47
and those relied by the bank and are Ex.MW1/3 to
Ex.MW1/26, nowhere got to establish that the claimant
was ever engaged by the bank. Entries in the log book are
recorded by the driver with a view to ascertain whether
the vehicle was used by the officer for official purpose or
for private use. It would not matter that these entries are
recorded by a personal driver. When bank permits an
officer to use official vehicle by obtaining services of a
personal driver, in that situation personal driver would
not become an employee of the bank. Therefore entries in
these by book nowhere espouse the cause of the claimant.
Copies of the vouchers, proved by the bank, are Ex.MW1/
27 to Ex.MW1/54. These documents clinch the issue to
the effect that the claimant never served the bank nor his
wages were paid to him by the bank.
11. Whether relationship of employer and employee
existed between the parties? For an answer to this
proposition, it is to be appreciated as to how a contract of
service is entered into. The relationship of employer and
employee is constituted by a contract, express or implied
between employer and employee. A contract of service is
one in which a person undertakes to serve another and to
obey his reasonable orders within the scope of the duty
undertaken. A contract of employment may be inferred
from the conduct which goes to show that such a contract
was intended although never expressed and when there
has, in fact, been employment of the kind usually
performed by the employees. Any such inference,
however, is open to rebuttal as by showing that the relation
between the parties concerned was on a charitable footing
or the parties were relations or partners or were directors
of a limited company which employed no staff. While the
employee, at the time, when his services were engaged,
need not have known the identity of his employer, there
must have been some act or contract by which the parties
recognized one another as master or servant.
12. To establish the fact that he was ever engaged
by the bank in its service, the claimant presses his ocular
testimony in service. Ocular facts detailed by the claimant
4620
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
are self serving words, which do not get support from any
evidence, direct or circumstantial. His testimony stands
discredited by the documentary evidence produced by
the claimant himself, which are Ex.WW1/1 to Ex.WW1/14.
These documents are vouchers as well as receipt which
go to establish that the claimant was paid his wages by
Shri Tangri. The wages paid by him to the claimant were
reimbursed to him by the bank. Documents, which are
Ex.MW1/27 to Ex.MW1/54, go it establish that fact. All
these facts make it apparent that wages of the claimant
were being paid by Shri Tangri. Admittedly no appointment
letter was issued by the bank in favour of claimant. He
was never on the roll of the bank. These facts coupled
with the factum of wages being paid by Shri Tangri to the
claimant make it clear that he was an employee of
Shri Tangri and not of the bank. The claimant has failed to
show that relationship of employer and employee ever
existed between him and the bank. Issues are, therefore,
answered in favour of the bank and against the claimant.
Issue No. 3
13. The claimant was engaged as personal driver by
Shri Tangri. Expenses incurred on his wages were being
reimbursed by the bank to Tangri up to the prescribed
limit. The mere fact that the claimant used to drive vehicle
of the bank for Tangri would not establish any relationship
of employer and employee between the claimant and the
bank. With such a proposition, the Apex Court was
confronted in Gulam Dastgir (AIR 1978 SC 481). In that
case the Area Manager of a nationalized bank was being
given personal allowance by the bank to enable him to
employ personal driver of his own. The jeep which was
being driven by the driver belonged to the bank. Its petrol
and oil requirements and maintenance were within the
financial responsibility of the bank. There was no evidence
to the effect that the driver was employed by the bank or
under its directions and control. There was also no
evidence that the salary of the driver was paid by the
bank. Considering all these aspects, Apex Court ruled that
there was no case of camouflage and sham contract. When
the driver was engaged by the Area Manager, there existed
no control and supervision over the driver by the bank,
which fact negatived existence of relationship of employer
and employee between the parties. Nothing unusual was
noticed by the Apex Court when the bank gave allowance
to its officer for engaging services of a personal driver.
The said precedent is squarely applicable to the present
controversy.
14. Claimant may seek reliance on a precedent in
Ghanshyam (JT 2001 (Suppl.l) SC 229) wherein the Apex
Court was concerned with the powers contained in section
17-B of the Act. It was ruled therein that section 17-B of
the Act does not preclude the High Courts or the Apex
Court under articles 226 and 136 of the Constitution from
passing appropriate interlocatory orders, having regard
to the facts and circumstances of the case. The court may,
depending on the facts of a case, direct payment of full
wages under section 17-B of the Act only by the employer
of the workman. The question whether the workman is
entitled to the full wages last drawn or full salary, which he
would be entitled to in the event of reinstatement while
the award is under challenge in the High Court or Apex
Court, depends upon the terms of the orders passed by
the court, which has to be determined on the interpretation
of the order granting relief.
15. In that matter Ghanshyam was engaged as
personal driver by the Regional Manager of the Dena
Bank at Lucknow. At the end of tenure of the Regional
Manager, services of Ghanshyam were terminated w.e.f.
August,90. He raised an industrial dispute and the
industrial adjudicator passed an award holding that
Ghanshyam was driver of the bank, termination of his
services was uncalled for, hence he was ordered to be
reinstated with back wages. The correctness of the award
was assailed before the High Court of Judicature at
Allahabad. Vide order dated 4-5-2000 High Court directed
that Ghanshyam be paid wages in regular pay scale w.e.f.
December 6, 1996, within one month from the date of
production of the certified copy of that order, failing which
the appellant was directed to appear before the court on
4-7-2001. The said order was under challenge before the
Apex Court. The Apex Court ruled that by the interim order
High Court did not grant relief in terms of section 17-B,
may there is reference to that section in the order.
Therefore, question of payment of "full wages last drawn"
to Ghanshyam does not arise. Consequently it is evident
that the precedent relied in Ghanshyam would not espouse
the case of the claimant.
16. Ghomarbhai Harjibhai Rabari (2005 (2) LLJ 475)
presents a situation when a personal driver engaged by
the Executive of Bank of Baroda was held to be an
employee of the bank. In that case, the driver produced
three vouchers which showed that he had been paid certain
sums of money towards his wages and the said amount
has been debited to the account of the bank. The bank
could not rebut those vouchers. Signatures of the driver
were also there on the register maintained by the bank.
These facts led the Apex Court to conclude that
relationship of employer and employee existed between
the driver and the bank.
17. Here in the present controversy, the claimant
could not show that his wages were paid by the bank or
his name appeared in attendance register or payment scroll
maintained by the bank. On the other hand, it has been
established that he was personal driver of Tangri.
Consequently, the precedent in Gulam Dastgir (supra) rules
the field, as far as facts of the present controversy are
concerned. Relying the said precedent and on
consideration of the facts of the present controversy, it is
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4621
concluded that the claimant was working as a personal
driver of the Deputy General Manager. There was no
occasion for the bank to deal with the claimant at all.
18. Since there existed no relationship of employer
and employee between the claimant and the bank,
termination of services of the claimant by the Deputy
General Manager, in the event of his transfer to some other
station nowhere violates provisions of the Act. It cannot
be said that the claimant was an industrial employee and a
workman within the meaning of clause (s) of section 2 of
the Act. It cannot be said that dispensation of his services
amounted to retrenchment within the meaning of clause
(oo) of section 2 of the Act. Under these circumstances
provisions of sections 25-F, 25-G and 25-H of the Act
nowhere come for rescue of the claimant. He is not entitled
to any relief from the bank. An award is passed in favour
of the bank and against the claimant. It be sent to the
appropriate Government for publication.
.
Dr. R. K.YADAV, Presiding Officer
Dated : 12-12-2012
ubZ fnYyh] 5 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1635-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj ¯lfMdsV cSad ds
çca/ra=k ds laca¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/ esa
fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je
U;k;ky;&1 fnYyh ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 35@2011) dks çdkf'kr
djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 01&07&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y&12012@28@2000&vkbZvkj (ch&II)º
lqefr ldykuh] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 5th July, 2013
S.O. 1635.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 35/2011)
of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour
Court, No. 1, Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the
industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the
management of Syndicate Bank and their workman, which
was received by the Central Government on 01-07-2013.
[No. L- 12012/28/2000-IR(B-II)]
SUMATI SAKLANI, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE DR. R. K. YADAV, PRESIDING
OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERMENT INDUSTRIAL
TRIBUNAL NO. 1, KARKARDOOMA COURTS
COMPLEX, DELHI
I.D. No. 35/2011
Shri K. Periaswami,
C/o No.6, Mahadev Road,
New Delhi - 110001. ....Workman
Versus
The Asst. General Manager,
Syndicate Bank,
6-Bhagwan Dass Road,
Sarojini House,
New Delhi-11 0001. ....Management
AWARD
While working as clerk in Foreign Exchange
Branch, New Delhi, Syndicate Bank (in short the bank)
Shri K.Periaswami opened saving bank account No. 3785,
4116 and 4410 in his own name saving bank account
No. 4503 in the name of his wife Smt.Meena with his own
introduction and carried out instructions involving
turnover running into crores of rupees which were beyond
the scope of his employment. Transactions in these
accounts were done almost on regular basis either through
demand drafts or through clearing and the amounts, so
credited, were withdrawn on the same date. The demand
drafts were drawn/issued by various branches of the bank
or other banks at Tamilnadu and Pondicherry. It led to the
authorities that the claimant and his wife were having
assets disproportionate to their known source of income.
The claimant was arrested by the Central Bureau of
Investigation on 25.9.97. The bank issued a charge sheet
to the claimant on 28.1.98 and domestic enquiry was
conducted. The Enquiry Officer recorded findings against
Shri K.Periaswami. The Disciplinary Authority concurred
with the Enquiry Officer and awarded punishment of
dismissal to him. Aggrieved by the punishment awarded
to him, Shri K.Periaswami raised a demand of reinstatement
in service. When his demand was not conceded to, he
raised an industrial dispute before the Conciliation Officer.
The bank contested his claims and as such conciliation
proceedings ended into a failure. On consideration of
failure report, submitted by Conciliation Officer, the
appropriate Govt. referred the dispute to this Tribunal for
adjudication, vide order No.L-12012/28/2000-IR(B-II) New
Delhi, dated 13-06-2000 with following terms:
"Whether the dismissal of Shri K.Periaswami,
workman from service by the management of
Syndicate Bank is legal and justified? If not, what
relief is the workman concerned entitled to?"
2. Claim statement was filed by Shri K.Periaswami
pleading therein that he was a regular employee of the
bank since 1-1-1980. He rendered service for 20 years, which
remained satisfactory throughout. On 28.01.98 a charge
sheet was served upon him,which was preceded by his
suspension. He gave a reply to the charge sheet. However
the bank constituted a domestic enquiry. He participated
in enquiry and claimed that no misconduct was committed
by him. The Enquiry Officer submitted a report dated
21-12-98 holding him guilty of charges. There was no
evidence against him, showing that he committed a
misconduct. He had explained the transactions before the
authorities. According to him, his friends and relatives,
4622
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
besides other known persons, while coming to Delhi,
brought drafts instead of cash with them, with a view to
avoid risk of loosing the money in transit. He deposited
those drafts in his accounts or account of his wife,
withdrew the money representing the drafts and handed it
over to the persons, who had brought the draft. According
to him no business was carried out by him, outside scope
of his employment. The Disciplinary Authority awarded
punishment of dismissal to him. His appeal was also
dismissed by the Appellate Authority. The action of the
bank, in dismissing him from service is arbitrary and
uncalled for. He has not committed any act prejudicial to
the interest of the bank. He claims that he may be reinstated
in service with continuity and full back wages.
3. The bank demurs the claim pleading that while
posted as clerk at Foreign Exchange Branch New Delhi,
the claimed opened saving bank accounts No. 3785, 4116
and 4410 his own name and account No.4503 in the name
of his wife Smt.Meena, with his own introduction. He
carried out instructions involving huge turnover running
into crores of rupees, which were beyond the scope of his
employment. There were regular credits to these accounts.
He used to withdraw the amount on the date of credit
entry. His activities led the authorities to suspicion that
he was doing business outside the scope of his
employment. He was arrested by the CBI, for which a wide
publicity was given in the press. The bank received a jolt
to its fair image in the eyes of the public. A charge sheet
was served upon him on 28.9.98. Reply, submitted by the
claimant, was not found satisfactory. A domestic enquiry
was constituted. Due opportunities were given by the
Enquiry Officer to the claimant to defend himself. The
Enquiry Officer recorded findings against the claimant.
The Disciplinary Authority concurred with the Enquiry
Officer and proposed punishment of dismissal from service.
After giving him an opportunity of being heard, the
claimant was dismissed from service on 27-02-1999. The
Appellate Authority also gave him an opportunity of being
head and dismissed his appeal. It is wrong to assert that
the claimant explained those transactions. However he
admitted heavy transactions in his accounts, referred
above. Punishment awarded to the claimant commensurate
to his misconduct. He is not entitled to any relief. His
claim deserves dismissal, hence it may be dismissed, pleads
the bank.
4. Vide order No.Z-22019/6/2007-IR(C-II), New Delhi,
dated 11-02-2008, appropriate Government transferred the
case to Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. II, New
Delhi, for adjudication. Vide order No.Z-22019/6/2007-IR
(C-II), New Delhi, dated 30-03-2011, the case was re-
transferred by the appropriate Government to this Tribunal
for adjudication.
On pleadings of the parties following issues were
settled :
(i) Whether enquiry conducted by the management
was just, fair and proper?
(ii) Whether punishment awarded to the claimant
was proportionate to his misconduct?
(iii) As in terms of reference.
(iv) Relief.
6. On consideration of evidence adduced by the
claimant and documents produced by the bank, the issue
relating to virus of enquiry, which was treated as
preliminary issue, was answered in favour of the bank and
against the claimant, vide order dated 23-09-2011.
7. Arguments on proportionality of punishment were
heard. Shri R.K.Patra, authorized representative, advanced
arguments on behalf of the claimant Shri Rajesh Mahendru,
authorized representative, presented facts on behalf of
the bank. I have given my careful consideration, to the
arguments advanced at the bar and cautiously perused
the record. My findings on issues involved in the
controversy are as follows:
Issue Nos. 2 & 3
8. Prior to introduction of Section 11A of the Act,
adjudicatory powers of the Tribunal were articulated in
Buckingham & Carnatak Company [1951 (2) LLJ 314]. Four
standards were delineated by the Labour Appellate
Tribunal in the above case to render managerial right of
taking disciplinary action vulnerable, namely, (i) where
there is a want of bonafides or (ii) when it is a case of
victimization or unfair labour practice or violation of the
principles of natural justice, or (iii) when there is basic
error of facts, or (iv) when there has been a perverse finding
on the materials. This articulation was adopted by the
Apex Court with slight modification in Indian Iron and
Steel Company Limited [1958 (1) LLJ 260], without any
acknowledgement to the precedent in Buckingham &
Carnatic case (supra), wherein it was ruled that the power
of the management to direct its own internal administration
and discipline was not unlimited and liable to be interfered
with by industrial adjudication when a dispute arises to
see whether termination of services of a workman is
justified and to give appropriate relief. However, it was
announced that the jurisdiction of an Industrial Tribunal
to interfere with the managerial prerogative of taking
disciplinary action is not of appellate nature as the
legislature has not chosen to confer such jurisdiction
upon it. Hence Tribunal could not substitute its own
judgement for that of the management. The Court laid down
that in the following circumstances an industrial
adjudicator can interfere with the disciplinary action taken
by the employer : (1) when there is want of good faith,
(2) when there was victimization or unfair labour practice,
(3) when the management had been guilty of a basic error
or violation of the principles of natural justice, or (4) when
on the materials, the finding was completely baseless or
perverse.
9. Enunciation (1) and (2), referred above, are
addressed to the bona fides of the employer in initiating
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4623
the action and inflicting the punishment, while postulates
(3) and (4) are addressed to domestic enquiry. Therefore,
an employer is required to act bona-fide in initiating
disciplinary action as well as in inflicting the punishment.
In initiating the action the alleged act of misconduct
should not be a ruse for something else, such as the trade
union activities of the workman or employers dislike of
him for some personal reasons. The action should not be
motivated by vindictiveness or ulterior purpose, so as to
smack for victimization or unfair labour practice. Likewise
in the matter of inflicting punishment, the employer should
act fairly. In case punishment awarded is so shockingly
disproportionate to the act of the misconduct, as no
reasonable man would ever impose that itself may lead to
an inference of malafides, victimization or unfair labour
practice. In holding enquiry, the Enquiry Officer must
comply with the rules of natural justice. He must not be a
biased person and give reasonable opportunity to both
sides for being heard. His findings should not be baseless
or perverse.
10. In Ramswarth Sinha (1954 L.A.C. 697) the Labour
Appellate Tribunal recognized the right of the
management to ask for permission to adduce evidence
before the Tribunal to justify its action in a "no enquiry"
case. Following that proposition the Apex Court equated
the cases of "defective enquiry" with "no enquiry" cases
and ruled that in either cases, the Tribunal have jurisdiction
to go into the merits of the case on the basis of evidence
adduced before it by the parties. Reference can be made
to the precedent in Motipur Sugar Factory Pvt. Ltd. [1965
(2) LLJ 162] where the empoyer had held no enquiry at all
before the dismissal and, therefore, adduced evidence to
justify its action before the Tribunal, which decision was
upheld. The Apex Court discarded the plea on behalf of
the workman that since no enquiry at all had been held by
the employer, it had no right to adduce evidence to justify
its stand before the Tribunal. In Ritz Theatre [1962 (II) LLJ
498] it was ruled by the Supreme Court that the Tribunal
would be justified to go to the merits of the case and
decide for itself on the basis of the evidence adduced
whether the charges have indeed been made out. It
announced that it would neither be fair to the management
nor fair to the workman himself in such a case that the
Tribunal should refuse to take the evidence and thereby
drive the management to pass through the whole process
of holding the enquiry all over again. Reference can also
be made to the precedent in Bharat Sugar Mills Ltd. [1961
(11) LLJ 644].
11. In Delhi Cloth and General Mills Company [1972
(1) LLJ 180], Apex Court considered the catena of
decisions over the subject and laid down the following
principles :
"(1) If no domestic enquiry had been held by the
management, or if the management makes it clear
that it does not rely upon any domestic enquiry that
may have been held by it, it is entitled to
straightaway adduce evidence before the Tribunal
justifying its action. The Tribunal is bound to
consider that evidence so adduced before it, on
merits, and give a decision thereon. In such a case,
it is not necessary for the Tribunal to consider the
validity of the domestic enquiry as the employer
himself does not rely on it.
(2) If a domestic enquiry had been held, it is open to
the management to rely upon the domestic enquiry
held by it, in the first instance, and alternatively and
without prejudice to its plea that the enquiry is
proper and binding, simultaneously adduce
additional evidence before the Tribunal justifying
its action. In such a case no inference can be drawn,
without anything more, that the management has
given up the enquiry conducted by it.
(3) When the management relies on the enquiry
conducted by it, and also simultaneously adduces
evidence before the Tribunal, without prejudice to
its plea that the enquiry proceedings are proper, it is
the duty of the Tribunal, in the first instance, to
consider whether the enquiry proceedings
conducted by the management, are valid and proper.
If the Tribunal is satisfied that the enquiry
proceedings have been held properly and are valid,
the question of considering the evidence adduced
before it on merits, no longer survives. It is only
when the holds that the enquiry proceedings have
not been properly held, that it derives jurisdiction
to deal with the merits of the dispute and in such a
case it has to consider the evidence adduced before
it by the management and decide the matter on the
basis of such evidence.
(4) When the domestic enquiry has been held by
the management and the management relies on the
same, it is open to the latter to request the Tribunal
to try the validity of the domestic enquiry as a
preliminary issue and also ask for an opportunity to
adduce evidence before the Tribunal, if the finding
on the preliminary issue is against the management.
However, elaborate and cumbersome the procedure
may be, under such circumstances, it is open to the
Tribunal to deal, in the first instance, as a preliminary
issue the validity of the domestic enquiry. If its
finding on the preliminary issue is in favour of the
management, then no additional evidence need be
cited by the management. But, if the finding on the
preliminary issue is against the management, the
Tribunal will have to give the employer an
opportunity to cite additional evidence and also give
a similar opportunity to the employee to lead
evidence contra, as the request to adduce evidence
4624
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
had been made by the management to the Tribunal
during the course of the proceedings and before the
trial has come to an end. When the preliminary issue
is decided against the management and the latter
leads evidence before the Tribunal, the position,
under such circumstances, will be, that the
management is deprived of the benefit of having the
finding of the domestic tribunal being accepted as
prima facie proof of the alleged misconduct. On the
other hand, the management will have to prove, by
adducing proper evidence, that the workman is guilty
of misconduct and that the action taken by it is
proper. It will not be just and fair either to the
management or to the workman that the Tribunal
should refuse to take evidence and thereby ask the
management to take a further application, after
holding a proper enquiry, and deprive the workman
of the benefit of the Tribunal itself being satisfied,
on evidence adduced before it, that he was or was
not guilty of the alleged misconduct.
(5)
The management has got a right to attempt to
sustain its order by adducing independent evidence
before the Tribunal. But the management should
avail itself of the said opportunity by making a
suitable request to the Tribunal before the
proceedings are closed. If no such opportunity has
been available of, or asked for by the management,
before the proceedings are closed, the employer can
make no grievance that the Tribunal did not provide
such an opportunity. The Tribunal will have before
it only the enquiry proceedings and it has to decide
whether the proceedings have been held properly
and the findings recorded therein are also proper.
(6) If the employer relies only on the domestic
enquiry and does not simultaneously lead additional
evidence or ask for an opportunity during the
pendency of the proceedings to adduce such
evidence, the duty of the Tribunal is only to consider
the validity of the domestic enquiry as well as the
finding recorded therein and decide the matter. If
the Tribunal decides that the domestic enquiry has
not been held properly, it is not its function to invite
suo moto the employer to adduce evidence before it
to justify the action taken by it.
(7) The above principles apply to the proceedings
before the Tribunal, which have come before it either
on a reference under Section 10 or by way of an
application under Section 33 of the Act”.
12. Keeping in view the proposition laid by the
Apex Court in Delhi Cloth and General Mills Company
(supra), the Parliament inserted Section 11-A in the Act,
which came into force w.e.f. 15th of December, 1971. In the
statement of objects and reasons for inserting Section 11-A,
it was stated:
"(1) In Indian Iron and Steel Company Limited and
Another Vs. Their Workmen (AIR 1958 S.C. 130 at
p.138), the Supreme Court, while considering the
Tribunal's power to interfere with the management's
decision to dismiss, discharge or terminate the
services of a workman, has observed that in case of
dismissal on misconduct, the Tribunal does not act
as a court of appeal and substitute its own judgment
for that of the management and that the Tribunal
will interfere only when there is want of good faith,
victimization, unfair labour practice, etc., on the part
of the management.
(2) The International Labour Organisation, in its
recommendation (No.119) concerning 'Termination
of employment at the initiative of the employer'
adopted in June 1963, has recommended that a
worker aggrieved by the termination of his
employment should be entitled to appeal against
the termination among others, to a neutral body such
as an arbitrator, a court, an arbitration committee or
a similar body and that the neutral body concerned
should be empowered to examine the reasons given
in the termination of employment and the other
circumstances relating to the case and to render a
decision on the justification of the termination. The
International Labour Organisation has further
recommended that the neutral body should be
empowered (if it finds that the termination of
employment was unjustified) to order that the worker
concerned, unless reinstated with unpaid wages,
should be paid adequate compensation or afforded
some other relief.
(3) In accordance with these recommendations, it
is considered that the Tribunal’s power in an
adjudication proceeding relating to discharge or
dismissal of a workman should not be limited and
that the Tribunal should have the power, in cases
wherever necessary to set aside the order of
discharge or dismissal and direct reinstatement of
the workman on such terms and conditions, if any,
as it thinks fit or give such other reliefs to the
workman including the award of any lesser
punishment in lieu of discharge or dismissal as the
circumstances of the case may require. For this
purpose, a new Section 11-A is proposed to be
inserted in the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947...”
13. After insertion of Section 11-A, the Apex Court
summed up the law in the case of Firestone Tyre and
Rubber Company [1973 (1) LLJ 278] in the following
propositions:
‘‘(1) The right to take disciplinary action and to
decide upon the quantum of punishment are mainly
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4625
managerial functions, but if a dispute is referred to a
Tribunal, the latter has power to see if action of the
employer is justified.
(2) Before imposing the punishment, as employer is
expected to conduct a proper enquiry in accordance
with the provisions of the 4 Standing Orders, if
applicable, and principles of natural justice. The
enquiry should not be an empty formality.
(3) When a proper enquiry has been held by an
employer, and the finding of misconduct is a plausible
conclusion flowing from the evidence, adduced at
the said enquiry, the Tribunal has no jurisdiction to
sit in judgement over the decision of the employer
as an appellate body. The interference with the
decision of the employer will be justified only when
the findings arrived at in the enquiry are perverse or
the management is guilty of victimization, unfair
labour practice or mala fide.
(4) Even if no enquiry has been held by an employer
or if the enquiry held by him is found to be defective,
the Tribunal in order to satisfy itself about the
legality and validity of the order, had to give an
opportunity to the employer and employee to adduce
evidence before it. It is open to the employer to
adduce evidence for the first time justifying his
action, and it is open to the employee to adduce
evidence contra.
(5) The effect of an employer not holding an enquiry
is that the Tribunal would not have to consider only
whether there was a prima facie case. On the other
hand, the issue about the merits of the impugned
order of dismissal or discharge is at large before the
Tribunal and the latter, on the evidence adduced
before it, has to decide for itself whether the
misconduct alleged is proved. In such cases, the
point about the exercise of managerial functions does
not arise at all. A case of defective enquiry stands
on the same footing as no enquiry.
(6) The Tribunal gets jurisdiction to consider the
evidence placed before it for the first time in
justification of the action taken only, if no enquiry
has been held or after the enquiry conducted by an
employer is found to be defective.
(7) It has never been recognized that the Tribunal
should straightaway without anything more, direct
reinstatement of a dismissed or discharged
employee, once it is found that no domestic enquiry
has been held or the said enquiry is found to be
defective.
(8) An employer, who wants to avail himself of the
opportunity of adducing evidence for the first time
before the Tribunal to justify his action, should ask
for it at the appropriate stage. If such an opportunity
is asked for, the Tribunal has no power to refuse.
The giving of an opportunity to an employer to
adduce evidence for the first time before the Tribunal
is in the interest of both the management and the
employee and to enable the Tribunal itself to be
satisfied about the alleged misconduct.
(9) Once the misconduct is proved either in the
enquiry conducted by an employer or by the
evidence placed before a Tribunal for the first time,
punishment imposed cannot, be interfered with by
the Tribunal except in cases where the punishment
is so harsh as to suggest victimization.
(10) In a particular case, after setting aside the order
of dismissal, whether a workman should be
reinstated or paid compensation is, as held by this
Court in The Management of Panitole Tea Estate
Vs. The workmen, within the judicial decision of a
Labour Court or Tribunal".
14. Jurisdiction to interfere with the punishment is
also not confined to the case where punishment is
shockingly disproportionate to the act of the mis-conduct.
The Tribunal has power of substituting its own measure
of punishment in place of managerial wisdom. Change in
legal position, post introduction of Section 11A of the Act
has been effectively summarized in the case of
Ambassador Sky Chef (1996 Lab. I.C. 299) wherein High
Court of Bombay observed that the section gives
specifically two fold powers to an industrial adjudicator:
firstly, it is a virtual power of appeal against the findings
of fact made by the Enquiry Officer in his report with regard
to the adequacy of the evidence and conclusion on facts,
and secondly, and far more important, it is the power of re-
appraisal of quantum of punishment. Now no restriction
lies on an industrial adjudicator to interfere with the enquiry
only on four grounds, referred above. However, wide
discretionary powers with the adjudicator are to be
exercised in judicial and judicious manner before it
interferes with the order of mis-conduct or punishment.
15.With this prelude in mind, I would revert to factual
matrix of the controversy. Claimant projects that case
registered against him, was closed by the CBI since there
was no material warranting his trial. It has been agitated
on his behalf that order dated 05-02-04, passed by Special
Judge, CBI, go to establish that he had not committed any
offence. Perusal of that order make it clear that the Special
Judge, C.B.I. accepted the closure report, since there was
no material warranting trial of the claimant. Trial commences
when material is collected to project that a cognizable
offence is committed by some one. Therefore the order of
the Special Judge projects a situation that there was no
material for trial of the claimant for an offence of possessing
asserts dis-proportionate to known sources of his income.
Question for consideration would be as to whether
4626
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
misconduct is synonymous with a crime. For an answer to
this proposition it would be appropriate to know as to
what term ‘misconduct’ means, The concept of misconduct
is a general concept and is not related to relationship of
master and servant only. The dictionary meaning of the
word 'misconduct' are: "improper behaviour, intentional
wrong doing or deliberate violation of a rule of standard
of behaviour. "Misconduct is a transgression of some
established and definite rule of action, where no discretion
is left except what necessity may demand: it is violation of
definite law, a forbidden act and differs from carelessness.
It comprises of positive acts and not mere neglect or
failure.
16. Under Indian Penal Code and other special and
local laws some acts or omissions are offences for which a
person can be punished by the sovereign power of the
State. These offences or acts are considered to be
prejudicial to the interest of the society in general and,
therefore, they are prohibited by law. There are, however,
various other organizations such as professional bodies,
educational institutions, clubs,corporations etc. and
anyone who wants to be admitted to such bodies, by being
member or otherwise, is also required to act under certain
rules arid remain subject to certain discipline. If he does
anything in violation of rules, regulations, or any law
inconsistent with his position as a member of that society,
then he is liable to lose advantage and facilities of the
association with that society or organization. Any such
act is, therefore, generally called misconduct. Primary
meaning of the word 'misconduct' is bad management, mis-
management and malfeasance or culpable neglect of an
official in regard to his office. Both in law and in ordinary
parlance, the term misconduct usually implies an act done
willfully with a wrong intention and as applied to
professional acts, even though such acts are not inherently
wrongful, it means also dereliction of or deviation from
duty. Even assuming that a particular act is negligence
and not misconduct, such a negligence which amounts to
dereliction of or deviation from duty cannot be excused.
See In re:-Mehboob Alikhan (AIR 1958 AP 116).
17. In N.M. Roshan Umar Karim and Co.(AIR 1936
Mad. 508) following three different meaning of the word
'misconduct' were given :
‘‘(a) Misconduct is not established by proving even
culpable negligence. It is something opposed to
accident or negligence and is doing of something
which the doer knows to be wrong or which he does
recklessly not careing what the result would be.
(b) Misconduct is distinguished from accident and
is not far from negligence-not only gross and
culpable negligence and involves that a person
misconducts himself when it is wrong conduct on
his part, in the existing circumstances to do or to fail
or omit to do a particular thing or to persist in the
act, failure or omission or acting with carelessness.
It is incorrect that a misconduct only refers to acts
of gross or culpable negligence and nor mere
negligence.
(c) Misconduct does not ordinarily covers acts of
negligence. The test of misconduct is not what a
reasonable man would have done in the
circumstances. It means that servant is guilty of
something which was inconsistent with the conduct
expected of him by the rules of the company’’. Above
three meanings were quoted by the Apex Court with
approval in Shiv Nath AIR 1965 SC 1666).
18. Whether mere negligence is a misconduct or not
will depend upon the nature of negligence and the
requirement of care which the employee was obliged to
use on the nature of services he was expected to perform.
Misconduct could be of three kinds :
(i) technical misconduct which leaves no trail of
indiscipline,
(ii) misconduct resulting in damage to the employer's
property which might be compensated by
forfeiture of gratuity or part thereof, and
(ii) serious misconduct such as acts of violence
against the management or other employee or
riotous of disorderly behaviour in or near the
place .of employment, which though not directly
causing damage, is conductive to grave
indiscipline.
19. In Ram Singh (1992 Lab. IC 2391) the Apex Court
observed that though the expression "misconduct" is "not
capable of precise definition, its dereliction receives its
connotation from the context, the delinquency in its
performance and its effect on the discipline and the nature
of duty. It may involve moral turpitude, it must be improper
or wrong behaviour, unlawful behaviour, willful in
character, forbidden act, a transgression of established
and definite rule of action or code of conduct but not mere
error of judgement, carelessness or negligence in
performance of duty, the act complained of bears forbidden
quality or character. Its ambit has to be construed with
reference to the subject matter and the context wherein
the term occurs, regard being had to the scope of the
statue and the public purpose it seeks to serve."
20. In industrial law, the word 'misconduct' has
acquired a specific connotation. In Shalimar Rope Works
Ltd. (1953 L.A.C. 584) the Labour Appellate Tribunal laid
down the criteria for determination as to whether an act
would be misconduct, viz. the act (i) is inconsistent with
the fulfillment of the express or implied conditions of
service, or (ii) is directly linked with the general relationship
of employer and employee or (iii) has a direct connection
with the contentment or comfort of the men at work, or
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4627
(iv) has a material bearing, on the smooth and efficient
working of the concern. If the answer to any of these
criteria is in affirmative, the action in question would
amount to an act of misconduct. In industrial law, there
two kinds of misconduct, namely; (I) gross or major
misconduct which justify punishment of dismissal or
discharge, and (II) minor misconduct which do not justify
punishment of dismissal or discharge but may call for lesser
punishment. See also Caltex India Ltd. (1966 (2) LLJ 137).
21. An act done willfully with a wrong intention would
amount to misconduct. Intention can be said to
consciously or willfully or deliberately doing an act which
it is known or foreseen or appreciated or realized, will as a
probable, perhaps highly probable, perhaps morally
certain, consequence, expose the victim to the risk of peril
of death or grievous bodily harm, even though the actor
may not wish or desire the result to ensue, may be certain
that it will ensue, or may have wanton disregard or
indifference as to whether it will nor not. Intention involves
foresight or knowledge of the probable or likely
consequences of injury, plus the desire or purpose or
object or end to do an act which will bring those
consequences about. Foresight or knowledge of the
probable or likely consequences does not or may not,
itself suffice to constitute intention, but it is naturally
very strong evidence of such an intention. Foresight or
knowledge is the best basis to find the requisite intention
proved and this must normally be expected to follow.
22. "Good faith' plays an important part in law of
crimes and its presence is ordinarily a sufficient answer to
a charge of criminality in many cases. Good faith is defined
in positive aspect by section 3(22) of the General Clauses
Act, 1897, which definition is extracted thus:
"3.(22) A thing shall be deemed to be done in 'good
faith' where it is in fact done honestly, whether it is done
negligently or not",
Element of honesty, introduced by the above
definition, is not present in the definition given in the
Penal Code. Negative definition of the phrase is given in
section 52 of the Penal Code, which runs thus:
"52. Nothing is said to be done or believed in 'good
faith' which is done or believed without care and
attention".
23. As defined by the Penal Code, definition of
phrase 'good faith' has no reference to the moral element
of honesty and right motive which are involved in popular
significance of 'good faith', defined by General Clauses
Act. To establish good faith under the penal law, it is
necessary to prove that the person pleading good faith
acted with due care and attention and an honest blunder
cannot be protected, without establishing the exercise of
due care and attention. The plea of good faith may be
negatived on the ground of recklessness indicative of want
of due care and attention if the imputation in question,
have been made as categorical statements of facts.
However law does not exact the same degree of care and
attention from all persons. It varies with the position they
occupy. In this sense, the question of 'good faith' is always
question of fact to be determined in accordance with the
proved facts and circumstances of each case.
24. The 'due' care required must depend upon the
nature of the act, its magnitude and importance and the
facility a person has for the exercise of care and attention.
It does not constitute 'good faith' necessarily because the
person making the imputation believed it to be true. Due
care and attention imply a genuine effort to reach the truth,
and not the ready acceptance of an ill natured belief. A
surgeon working in his surgery would be judged by a
different standard from that applicable to a surgeon in the
field. But where a quack unskilled in surgery performs an
operation which even a trained surgeon seldom dares, he
cannot be accredited with good faith, if his patient trusting
him succumbs to his operation.
25. The circumstances that operate on the exercise
of care and attention are so varied and variable that it is
not possible to fix a general standard by which the
presence or absence of 'good faith' may, in any case, be
tested. But at the same time, in such cases, it is always
permissible to argue ex post facto; that is to say, it may be
shown that there was a want of good faith' because there
was absence of the requisite care and caution. On the
other hand, a person relying upon ''load faith' may show
that he had taken the necessary care and caution, and
that, therefore, his act was done in good faith. As observed
by the Law Commission in its First Report : ‘He will be
required to prove that his conduct was such as to lead
fairly to the inference that he acted in good faith as alleged.
It is true that he cannot prove directly what was in his
mind, but he may be able to prove facts by which this may
be sufficiently manifested". To satisfy the Court of his
good faith, he must show at least that he acted advisedly
and that he had reasonable ground prima facie for believing
that he ought to do what he did.
26. In order to establish belief in good faith, a
person's simple belief in good faith that circumstances are
such and such, ought not to be sufficient: there ought to
be sufficiently strong and just ground for his belief. Belief
must have a foundation and that must be shown. Where a
person acts with thoughtless precipitancy, without making
sufficient inquiries and jumping to a conclusion upon
materials wholly unjustifiable, it cannot be said that he
had exercised good faith.
27. As a person, acting in good faith, is excepted
from criminality, presence of good faith in each case must
depend upon the circumstances which alone entitle a
person to exemption from criminal responsibility. The
burden lies on the delinquent to prove that he acted with
4628
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
good faith. The question of good faith must be considered
with reference to the position of the delinquent and the
circumstances under which he acted. The law does not
expect the same care and attention from all persons
regardless of the position they occupy.
28. As projected above, order of the Special Judge
accepting the closure report and forming an opinion that
there was no material to warrant trial of the claimant would
not espouse his cause. As brought over the record,
claimant opened saving bank accounts No. 3785 on
31-7-91, account number 4116 on 29-6-92 and account No.
4410 on 4-3-94. Saving bank account No.4503 was opened
in the name of his wife on 20-07-94, with his introduction.
Thus it has come over the record that various accounts
were opened by the claimant in his name as well as in the
name of his wife, with a view to route transactions involving
huge turnover, which fact is sufficient to conclude that he
was involved in business beyond the scope of his
employment. The claimant indulged in such activities,
without permission of his employer. When turnover worth
crores took place in those accounts, authorities concerned
with law and order became suspicious and arrested the
claimant. His arrest got wide publicity in the media and
image of the bank was tarnished. Claimant could not refute
that his dealings in the aforesaid accounts put his
employer's name to disregard.
29. An employee is expected to promote interest of
his employer in connection with the job for which he was
engaged. Contract of an employment engrafts a stipulation
that the employee should serve his mater with good faith
and fidelity. Thus it was expected of the claimed to inform
his employer in respect of the bank drafts, which he routed
through the aforesaid four accounts. He opted not to
inform his employer in that regard. Since there were heavy
turnovers in the aforesaid accounts, wherein crores of
rupees were involved, this proposition is conclusive of
the fact that of the claimant indulged in business beyond
the scope of his employment. For business activities he
never took his employer in confidence, nor obtained
permission in that regard. Further more activities of the
claimant had tarnished the image of his employer. His acts
and conduct proved detrimental to fair image of the bank.
Consequently it is clear that through his aforesaid acts
the claimant acted prejudicial to the interest of his employer
and committed gross misconduct. Financial loss is not
only criteria to be taken into account, while awarding
punishment for a misconduct. The misconduct committed
by the claimants, is serious one and penalty for such
misconduct should be harsher one. Such an employee
cannot be retained in service.
30. Question would arise as to whether punishment
of dismissal is the only appropriate penalty for the
misconduct. As detailed above, Special Judge, CBI,
recorded as opinion that there was no material warranting
trial of the claimant for an offence of possessing assets
disproportionate to known sources of his income.
However it is clear that commercial angle of such acts
cannot be ruled out. The claimant was moved with an idea
to gain out of those acts, which were done by him beyond
the scope of his employment. Further more he put
reputation of his employer to stake and tarnished fair image
of the bank. These facts, compled with his more than 20
years unblemished service, motive me to comment that
punishment of dismissal from service can neither be called
proportionate nor appropriate to his misconduct. This
punishment is excessive to the acts of his misconduct.
Considering all facts and circumstances projected by the
claimant, I am of the view that indulgence by the Tribunal
is called for. Therefore the Tribunal holds that punishment
lesser than dismissal is to be awarded to the claimant,
without making the bank to retain him in service. Hence
punishment of discharge simpleciter from service would
meet the ends of justice. This punishment would relive
the bank from retaining the claimant in service and the
claimant would receive his retrial benefits. This issues are,
therefore, answered accordingly.
Relief
31. In view of the aforesaid discussion it is crystal
clear that the claimant cannot seek reinstatement in the
service of the bank. Relief of lesser punishment than are
awarded to him is granted. Consequently punishment of
discharge simpleciter from service is awarded to the
claimant, which will entitle him to claim retrial benefits. An
award is accordingly passed. It be sent to the appropriate
Govt. for publication
Dr. R. K.YADAV, Presiding Officer
Dated: 12-12-2012
ubZ fnYyh] 8 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1636-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj cSad vkWiQ
bf.M;k ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds
chp vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k
lhthvkbZVh@,ylh@vkj@ua- 84@89) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks
dsUæh; ljdkj dks 27&06&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y&12012@736@88&Mh&2(,)&vkbZ vkj (ch&II)º
lqefr ldykuh] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 8th July, 2013
S.O. 1636.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (CGIT/LC/R/No.
84/89) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour
Court, Jabalpur now as shown in the Annexure in the
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4629
Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the
management of Bank of India and their workman, which
was received by the Central Government on 27-6-2013.
[No. L- 12012/736/88-D-2(A)-IR (B-II)]
SUMATI SAKLANI, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
JABALPUR
No. CGIT/LC/R/84/89
SHRI R.B.PATLE, Presiding Officer
Assistant General Secretary,
Madhya Pradesh Bank Employees Association,
Singhal Bhawan,
IInd Floor, Gwalior
. . . Workman/Union
Versus
Regional Manager,
Bank of India,E-2, 71,
Arera Colony, Gwalior
. . . Management
AWARD
Passed on this 11th day of June, 2013
1. As per letter dated 2-5-89 by the Government of
India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is
received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under
Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No. L-12012/
736/88/D-2(A)-IR (B-II). The dispute under reference
relates to:
“Whether the order No. GWL/PERS dated
14-10-86 issued by the Manager, Bank of India to
Shri V.K.Bahal advising him to take over the charge
of Head cashier of the Branch in place of Shri
J.K.Sharma promoted as Officer can be treated as an
order for his permanent charge of Head Cashier?
Whether the action of the Branch Manager, Gwalior
Branch in verbally withdrawing the charge of Head
Cashiers post from Shri V.K.Bahal w.e.f. 14-1-87 can
be treated as valid and correct? Further whether the
action of the management in awarding the
punishment of stoppage of two increments vide order
No. RB/PERS/IL/114 dated 27-2-87 in pending
chargesheet for more than for and half years old
during the course of pendency of conciliation
proceedings can be treated as unfair labour practice?
If the action of the management of Bank of India is
found to be unjustified to what benefits Shri
V.K.Bahal is entitled?”
2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to
the parties. Ist party workman submitted statement of claim.
I find that the statement of claim submitted by Ist party is
full of repetition. The substance of the contentions of Ist
party is that he was appointed as cashier cum clerk from
14-8-1973, He was transferred to Shivpuri on 6-12-1975 and
then to Gwalior and other places. He was active member of
Union at different level. That Head Cashier J.K.Sharma was
promoted. His post is vacant. The charge of cashier was
temporary assigned to him. According to the Ist party
workman, the charge of cashier remained with Senior most
cashier as per the rules and regulations. He was not given
charge of Head cashier permanently. The said act of the
management is alleged to be illegal. That he had made
correspondence with the higher authorities in that regard.
Despite of it, the charge of Head cashier was not given to
him. He further alleged that the chargesheet was issued to
him despite of the conciliation proceedings were pending.
Punishment withholding increment was imposed against
him. The said act of the management was illegal is in
contravention of Section 33(1) and (3) of I.D.Act. He submits
that the enquiry conducted against him was in violation of
principles of natural justice. The allegations could not be
proved against him. The Enquiry Officer was partial, bias,
the findings were perverse. Principles of natural justice
were not followed. Prior permission was not taken from
ALC as provided under Section 33(1) & (3) of I.D.Act. On
above contentions, the workman prays that the order dated
14-10-86 issued by management is illegal. Direction be
issued to give permanent charge of Head Cashier to him.
That punishment of imposing two punishments be set aside.
3. IInd party submitted Written Statement and
additional Written Statement denying the contentions of
the Ist party workman at Page 30/1 to 30/7. It is contented
that no permanent charge of Head cashier can be handed
over as claimed by Ist party. The chargesheet was legally
issued to the workman Enquiry was conducted following
principles of natural justice. The Disciplinary Authority
found charges against workman are proved. The
punishment withholding two increments is imposed. IInd
party prayed for rejection of reliefs prayed by workman.
4. Ist party filed rejoinder to the reply filed by the
IInd party and reiterated his earlier contentions.
5. Considering pleadings on record, the points which
arise for my consideration and determination are as under.
My findings are recorded against each of them for the
reasons as below :—
(i)
Whether the order dated
In Negative
14-10-86 issued by the Manager,
Bank of India to Shri V.K.Bahal
advising him to take over the
charge of Head cashier of the
Branch in place of Shri J.K.
Sharma promoted as Officer
can be treated as an order for
his permanent charge of Head
Cashier?
4630
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(ii)
Whether the action of the
In
Branch Manager, Gwalior
Affirmative
Branch in verbally withdrawing
the charge of Head Cashiers
post from Shri V.K. Bahal
w.e.f. 14-1-87 is legal?
(iii)
Whether the action of the
Not proved
management in awarding
the punishment of stoppage
of two increments during the
course of pendency of
conciliation proceedings can
be treated as unfair labour
practice?
(iv)
If not, what relief the workman
Relief
is entitled to?”
prayed by
workman
are rejected.
REASONS
6. The dispute under reference relates to three
questions— Ist— Whether the order dated 14-10-86 issued
by the Manager amounts to permanent charge of Head
Cashier, IInd—Whether the withdrawal of said charge as
per order dated 14-1-87 is illegal?, IIIrd—Whether the
punishment of withholding 2 increments is illegal. All those
questions are referred by this reference. Though elaborate
pleadings submitted in statement of claim and rejoinder
and various applications, the workman has failed to adduce
any evidence. In absence of evidence on behalf of the
workman, his claim is not substantiated. The management
has filed affidavit of evidence of witness Shri P.C. Saxena.
To be precise, the management’s witness Shri P.C. Saxena
has stated on oath that Manager allowed charge of Head
Cashier temporarily to Shri V.K. Bahal in view of his security
at branch. Manager of Bank could not have assigned such
duties on permanent basis to anybody because he was not
competent to do so. That the order dated 14-10-86 assigning
duties on temporary basis and not on permanent basis.
That Shri Bahal was to be assigned the temporary duties of
special Assistant. That Shri Bahal did not accept the duties
of Special Assistant, the Manager had to assign the said
duties to some one else. He has further stated that
disciplinary action for gross misconduct was pending
against Shri Bahal as per chargesheet dated 12-7-1982. As
such Shri Bahal was not eligible for assignment of Head
Cashier’s duties on permanent basis. The evidence of
management’s witness remained unchallenged.
7. The witness of management has further stated on
oath that chargesheet dated 30-8-83 contains three charges
against Mr. Bahal. He was given benefit of doubt with
regard to Charge No. 2. Charge No.1 is proved. The witness
denied that any prejudice is caused to Mr. Bahal. Principles
of natural justice was followed. The evidence of
management’s witness remained unchallenged. Workman
failed to adduce evidence. For above reasons, claim of
workman is not substantiated by evidence. Therefore his
claim cannot be upheld. For the above reasons I answer
Point No. l in Negative, Point No. 2 in Affirmative and Point
No. 3 in Negative.
8. In the result, award is passed as under:—
(i)
The order dated 14-10-86 issued by the Manager,
Bank of India to Shri V.K. Bahal advising him to
take over the charge of Head Cashier of the
Branch in place of Shri J.K. Sharma promoted as
Officer cannot be treated as an order for his
permanent charge of Head Cashier.
(ii)
Order dated 14-1-1987 in withdrawing charge of
Head Cashier is valid.
(iii)
Punishment of withholding of two increments is
legal.
(iv)
Reliefs prayed by workman are rejected.
R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 8 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1637-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj bafM;u
vksojlht cSad ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa
ds chp vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj
vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k
113@2004) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 3&7&2013
dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y&12012@76@2004&vkbZ vkj (ch&II)º
lqefr ldykuh] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 8th July, 2013
S.O. 1637.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (I.D. No. 113/2004)
of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour
Court, Hyderabad now as shown in the Annexure in the
Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the
management of Indian Overseas Bank and their workman,
which was received by the Central Government on
3-7-2013.
[No. L- 12012/76/2004-IR (B-II)]
SUMATI SAKLANI, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM -LABOUR COURT
AT HYDERABAD
PRESENT:
Smt. M. Vijaya Lakshmi, Presiding Officer
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4631
Dated the 5th day of June, 2013
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 113/2004
BETWEEN
Sri K.V. Venu,
R/o H.No. 2-5-57, Old Gadi Road,
Kamareddy, Nizamabad.
….Petitioner
AND
The Manager,
Indian Overseas Bank,
Kamareddy Branch,
Nizamabad.
….Respondent
APPEARANCES :
For the Petitioner
:
M/s. M. Venkataswamy, T.
Hanumantha Reddy and
Madhusudhan Reddy,
Advocates
For the Respondent :
M/s. A. Krishnam Raju,
G.D. Kumar, G.V.N. Babu,
N.P. Rao, A.B.S. Reddy,
N.V. Kumar and T. Singaiah,
Advocates.
AWA RD
The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its
order No. L- 12012/76/2004-IR (B-II) dated 18.8.2004 referred
the following dispute under section 10(1)(d) of the I.D.
Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal between the
management of Indian Overseas Bank and their workman
Sri K.V. Venu. The term of reference is,
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the General Manager, Indian
Overseas Bank, Central Office, Chennai in imposing
the punishment of discharge from service on Shri
K.V. Venu, Ex-Clerk/Shroff/Godown Keeper w.e.f.
10-9-1999 is justified or not? If not, what relief
terminated worker is entitled for ?”
The reference is numbered in this Tribunal as I.D.
No. 113/2004 and notices were issued to the parties.
2. Petitioner has filed claim statement stating therein
that he was appointed as messenger at Nizamabad Branch
of Respondent on 25.3.1983 and subsequently promoted
as Clerk/Shop/Godown Keeper in Nizamabad District. While
he was working as Cashier at Kamareddy Branch,
Respondent bank placed the Petitioner under suspension
pending enquiry vide proceedings dated 8-7-1998 alleging
that he had committed certain acts of commission and
omission which are prejudicial to the interest of the bank.
Charge-sheet was issued with him and Petitioner submitted
his explanation denying allegations levelled against him,
requesting that he should be exonerated from the charges.
An enquiry was conducted which is to be vitiated due to
non-observances of principles of natural justice. Hence,
this petition.
3. Respondent management has filed counter
statement stating therein that Petitioner Sri K.V. Venu while
working as Clerk/Shroff/Godown Keeper at Kamareddy
branch had misappropriated various remittances tendered
to him on various dates by SB account holders of the
branch, amount totalling to Rs. 98,250/-. Petitioner was
suspended from service on 8.7.98 and a charge sheet was
served on him dated 15.9.1998.
4. It is further submitted that Petitioner submitted
his explanation denying the charges. Enquiry was held,
management examined two witnesses and 31 documents
were marked. Though opportunity was provided Petitioner
had not examined witnesses on his behalf and produced
only one document as defence exhibit. He was extended
the benefit of interpreter by appointing Sri Nagaprasada
Rao, Special cadre Assistant as his interpreter as he stated
that he did not know English. Petitioner has chosen not to
cross examine the management witnesses. There was no
violation of principles of natural justice. Petitioner has not
submitted his written brief denying the charges and also
not submitted his comments to the written brief submitted
by the Presenting Officer. Enquiry proceeding were
conducted in a proper and fair manner holding the principles
of natural justice. Therefore, Petitioner was rightly
discharged from bank’s service as such, Petition is liable to
be dismissed.
5. Both parties have filed their respective documents.
Order has been passed on 15.11.2011 holding domestic
enquiry conducted in this case as valid.
6. Case stands posted for arguments. Petitioner as
well as Respondent are called absent. No representation
for either party. Inspite of giving fair opportunity they are
not showing any interest in the proceedings. No evidence
is also adduced on record either by way of marking
documents.
7. In the circumstances, taking that Petitioner is not
interested in the proceedings, petition is dismissed.
Award passed accordingly. Transmit.
Dictated to Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant
transcribed by her and corrected by me on this the 5th day
of June, 2013.
M. VIJAYA LAKSHMI , Presiding Officer
4632
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Appendix of evidence
Witnesses examined for
Witnesses examined for the
the Petitioner
Respondent
NIL
NIL
Documents marked for the Petitioner
NIL
Documents marked for the Respondent
NIL
ubZ fnYyh] 8 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1638-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj ;wdks cSad ds
çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/ esa
fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je
U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k lhthvkbZVh@,ylh@vkj@
22@99) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 3&7&2013
dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y&12012@86@98&vkbZ vkj (ch&II)º
lqefr ldykuh] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 8th July, 2013
S.O. 1638.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (CGIT/LC/R/No.
22/99) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour
Court, Jabalpur now as shown in the Annexure in the
Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the
management of UCO Bank and their workman, which was
received by the Central Government on 3-7-2013.
[No. L- 12012/86/98-IR-(B-II)]
SUMATI SAKLANI, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/22/99
Presiding Officer : SHRI R.B.PATLE
Shri Chakradari Parate,
387, Vaibhav Gaikwad House,
Ganesh Nagar,
Nagpur
. . . Workman
Versus
The Asstt. General Manager,
UCO Bank, Zonal Officer,
E-5, Arera Colony,
Bhopal
. . . Management
AWARD
Passed on this 17th day of June, 2013
1. As per letter dated 4-12-1998 by the Government
of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is
received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under
Section 10 of I.D. Act, 1947 as per Notification No. L-
12012/86/98-IR(B-II). The dispute under reference relates
to:
“Whether the action of the management of Asstt.
General Manager, UCO Bank in terminating the
services of Shri Chakradari Parate w.e.f. 26-4-97 is
justified? If not, what relief the workman is entitled
to?”
2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to
the parties. 1st party workman did not appear and file
Statement of claim.
3. Management filed exparte Written Statement. It is
submitted that 1st party workman Chakradhary Parate was
served with chargesheet dated 21-1-94 under Clause 19.5(j)
and 19.5(d) of the Bipartite Settlement dated 19-10-66. That
the 1st party workman working as clerk/officiating Teller in
the Bank at Budhwara Extention counter attached to
Marwari Road, Bhopal Branch mis-utilised Banks funds
causing wrongful loss to the Bank and other charges. He
has committed serious irregularities. The charges were
substantiated by documentary evidence. The delinquent
did not appear in the Departmental Enquiry. The Enquiry
Officer submitted his report that the charges were proved.
Considering the report of Enquiry Officer, letter dated
12-4-97 was issued proposing to impose punishment. 1st
party workman remained absent. Considering gravity of
charges, 1st party workman was dismissed. The workman
was also prosecuted by CBI. He was convicted for different
offences including Section 13(2)r/w13(1)(d) imposed 1 year
RI and find of Rs.1000 in each count and in default of
payment of find further 3 months RI in each count. IInd
party prayed for rejection of relief claimed by workman.
4. Considering pleadings on record, the points which
arise for my consideration and determination are as under.
My findings are recorded against each of them for the
reasons as below :—
(i)
Whether the action of the
In Affirmative
management of Asstt. General
Manager, UCO Bank in
terminating the services of
Shri Chakradari Parate w.e.f.
26-4-97 is legal?
(ii)
If so, to what relief the
Relief prayed by
workman is entitled to?
workman is
rejected.
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4633
REASONS
5. Though 1st party workman challenged his
termination of his service, he has failed to file Statement of
Claim. He has not participated in the reference, no evidence
is adduced by him to substantiate in any of the ground to
establish that his termination from service is illegal. The
management’s witness Satish Kumar in his affidavit of
evidence has stated that Departmental Enquiry was
conducted and charges about mis-appropriation of the
amount causing loss to the Bank were proved. That Ist
party workman was also convicted for offence under Section
13(2) and 13(1)(d) of PC Act. The copy of final order is
produced. The evidence of witness remained unchallenged.
I do not find reason to disbelieve the evidence of
management’s witness. From evidence discussed above, it
is clear that the termination of service of Ist party workman
Shri Ganesh was as per the report received from Enquiry
Officer. The charges were proved. The termination cannot
be said illegal. Therefore I record my finding on Point No.1
in Affirmative.
6. In the result, award is passed as under:-
(1)
The action of the management of Asstt. General
Manager, UCO Bank in terminating the services
of Shri Chakradari Parate w.e.f . 26-4-97 is legal.
(2)
Relief prayed by 1st party workman are rejected.
R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 8 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1639-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj cSad vkWiQ
bf.M;k ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds
chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k
lhthvkbZVh@,ylh@vkj@3@89) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh;
ljdkj dks 26&04&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y&12012@428@88&Mh&2(,)&vkbZ vkj (ch&II)º
lqefr ldykuh] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 8th July, 2013
S.O. 1639.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (CGIT/LC/R/
3/89) of the Central Government Labour Court, Jabalpur
now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute
between the employers in relation to the management of
Bank of India and their workman, which was received by
the Central Government on 26-4-2013.
[No. L- 12012/428/88-D-2(A)-IR (B-II)]
SUMATI SAKLANI, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/3/89
Presiding Officer : SHRI R.B.PATLE
Shri Santosh Kumar Malviya,
Ex.Clerk-cum-cashier,
Bank of India, PO Karhi,
Tehsil Maheshwar,
Pin- 450220
. . .Workman
Versus
Regional Manager,
Bank of India, Khandwa Region,
12, Anand Nagar,
Khandwa
. . . Management
AWARD
Passed on this 8th day of April 2013
1. As per letter dated 3-1-89 by the Government
of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is
received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under
Section -10 of I.D. Act, 1947 as per Notification No.L-12012/
428/88/-D-2(A). The dispute under reference relates to:
“ Whether the action of the management of Bank of
India in dismissing from service Shri S.K.Malviya is
justified? If not, to what relief is the workman
entitled?”
2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to
the parties. Ist party workman submitted statement of claim
at page 2/1 to 2/7. The case of workman is that he was
appointed as clerk-cum-cashier on 8-12-71. He was
confirmed on the said post on 8-6-72 after completion of
minimum period of probation. He was working as clerk-
cum-cashier at the time of his dismissal from service. He
claims to be workman under I.D.Act. That he was
performing his duty sincerely and honestly. On 28-6-82,
there was a shortage of Rs.15,000 cash. It put him in
hardship and inconvenience. On the day when he returned
after lunch break about 3 to 4 PM alongwith other staff
members, he found shortage of cash of Rs, 15,000. He tried
to tally cash and reported the matter to the Branch Manager,
Karhi. The shortage of cash was confirmed by Branch
Manager. On advise of Branch Manager, he arranged
shortage amount. He closed the cash as per the advise of
the Manager filling up denominations. The matter ended
with loss of Rs.15,000.
3. That after about 5 months, he received letter from
Regional Manager Khandwa suspending him from service
and informing him that Deptt. enquiry was to follow.
Chargesheet was issued to him on 29-10-82 alleging charges
4634
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
against him “that he had misappropriated Bank’s Fund
amounting Rs.15,000’’. That the workman misused his
position in borrowing money from the customers of the
Bank. He retreats that he had deposited shortage amount
on advise of Bank Manager. The charge of misappropriation
was not consistent. He has narrated about details of his
duties. On 1-7-82, he was intending to proceed on leave.
The Branch Manager wanted the applicant to write a letter
that he should be careful in future to see that shortage
should not occur. That shortage of cash cannot be said
misappropriation.
4. He further contends that he received showcause
notice dated 7-7-1983 but without report of Enquiry Officer.
That the punishment of dismissal was imposed against
him on 3-9-83. He submits that he had borrowed money to
make good the shortage and even that action was treated
as charge by the Bank though no prejudice was caused to
the Bank. The findings of the Enquiry Officer are perverse.
There is no proof of misappropriation . Only there is
shortage and some negligence which cannot be termed as
misconduct. The dismissal is not proper and reasonable. It
is imposed without considering his clean service record.
He challenged his dismissal filing appeal. The appeal was
dismissed. Ist party prayed for reinstatement with back
wages.
5. The IInd party management filed Written
Statement at Page 3/1 to 3/5. The contentions of Ist party
are denied. It is not disputed that shortage of cash of
Rs. 15,000 was found on 20-6-82. It is submitted that
shortage of cash was found after surprise inspection was
taken by Branch Manager. That Ist party workman had
deposited the said amount. He was handling the cash. Loss
of Rs.15,000 was caused to the Bank because of the
shortage. The cash of Rs.15,000 shortage was confirmed
by workman. The departmental proceeding indicate Ist
party workman was on duty. It is denied that he was
burdened with heavy work. The Enquiry Officer recorded
his finding. Charge No.1 was proved, Charge No.2 not
proved. Competent Authority issued showcause notice.
Ist party workman misappropriated Bank’s funds of
Rs.15,000. It is serious misconduct therefore the punishment
of dismissal imposed by competent authority cannot be
said illegal and improper. The punishment of dismissal is
legal and justified.
6. IInd party further contended that punishment of
dismissal is confirmed by Appellate Authority. The
reference is not maintainable. It is submitted that if it is
found that Departmental Enquiry was not properly held,
the IInd party management be permitted to lead evidence
to substantiate the charges. IInd party prayed for rejection
of the claim of Ist party.
7. Ist party filed rejoinder at Page 4/1 to 4/2. It is
denied that shortage of cash was found after surprise
checking of the Branch Manager. He denies that the Bank
suffered any loss. On advise of Branch Manager, he had
borrowed amount and made good the loss alleged. As the
incident was of shortage of amount, there was no question
of lodging FIR. If the matter would have been of mis-
appropriation, the Manager should have been bound to
lodge FIR. It is denied that report of Enquiry Officer was
supplied to him before imposing penalty. He reitreates that
punishment is harsh and improper. He also alleges
victimization on the basis of some extraneous
consideration.
8. Considering pleadings on record, the points
which arise for my consideration and determination are as
under. My findings are recorded against each of them for
the reasons as below :—
(i)
Whether the Deptt. Enquiry
This issue is
conducted by management
already decided
against the workman is
on 16-4-1996 that
legal and proper? If not,
action of mgt.
whether the management
is legal.
is entitled to prove the
misconduct of workman.
(ii)
To what relief, if any, the
Workman is not
workman is entitled to?”
entitled to any
relief.
Preliminary issue as to whether enquiry is conducted
proper and legal is decided by my predecessor. Enquiry
was conducted proper. There was no breach of natural
justice.
9. Learned predecessor has framed issues on
25-7-06. Issue No.1 is already decided and enquiry is held
proper. There is no question of management proving
misconduct of workman by adducing evidence. The 2nd
issue is to what relief, if any is the workman entitled?
Though said issue is not clearly worded, it implies whether
the punishment imposed against Ist party workman is
proper and justified. My finding on the said issue is that
punishment of dismissal is proper for the reasons given
hereinafter.
REASONS
10. Learned counsel for Ist party workman Shri
Pandey submits that there was shortage of cash of
Rs.15,000 on 28-6-82. On advise of Branch Manager,
workman immediately deposited the said amount. Ist party
workman had borrowed amount from staff members, his
brother and other persons. According to Shri Pandey, the
shortage of amount cannot be said to be gross misconduct
under clause 19-5(J) . That clause 43(1) or bipartite
agreement was also brought to my notice. He finally
emphasized that dismissal of workman is harsh and he
prayed for his reinstatement with full back wages. Learned
counsel for IInd party Mr. Shashi submits that Ist party
workman was working as cashier-cum-clerk, shortage of
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4635
Rs.15,000 was informed to Branch Manager and the amount
was deposited. The shortage of amount was not detected
by Branch Manager on his surprise inspection. The
chargesheet was issued to workman for dishonestly
misappropriated the amount. The amount was borrowed
by the workman. The evidence was adduced . Learned
counsel emphasized that misconduct or misappropriation
is proved against Ist party. Punishment of dismissal from
service is just and proper. Learned counsel relies on Ratio
held in several cases. I would deal with the ratio held in the
cases at later part of the judgment.
11. The record of enquiry proceeding is produced.
Ist Bipartite Settlement is produced on record. Clause 19.5(j)
provides :—
“ doing any act prejudicial to the interest of the bank
of gross negligence or negligence involving or likely
to involve the bank in serious loss;”
The charge No. 1 against workman under Clause
19.5(j) doesnot include the Act of misappropriation, rather
it deals with negligence in duties prejudicial with the interest
of the Bank and likely to cause serious loss. The
misappropriation of Bank amount contemplates dishonestly
receiving the amount with intention to cause wrongful loss
to the Bank or wrongful gain to the employee. The evidence
of management’s witness Shri V.K.Arora, Branch Manager
is at page 17/8 of the record of Enquiry Proceedings. He
says on 28-6-82, while checking cash, at the close of the
business he found that Rs.15,000 were less than shown in
cash Balance Book. That when he asked cash from workman
Mr.Malviya, he agreed that he had taken away Rs.15,000
and he promised to bring the same. However he has given
in writing also and he brought Rs.6500 in cash, a cheque of
Rs.7000 and three withdrawals of Saving Bank from three
staff members aggregating Rs.1500. The cheque and
withdrawals were shown as late payment on 28-6-82. On
his evidence, letter was marked as Exhibit M-2. In his cross-
examination, he confirms that cash payment shows total
payment made on 28-6-82 as Rs.16779.96. The receipt book
of the day shown total receipt of Rs. 4639.58. The entries
bear his signatures. The total payment of Rs. 16779.96 bears
his signature. He admits that he had obtained Exhibit M-3
to M-6 from Mr. Malviya on 28-6-10. The charges alleged
against workman is at page 17/3. Charge No. 1 reads—
“ On 28-6-82 at about 5.30 PM, the Branch cash was
checked and it was found that there was a shortage
of Rs.15,000. On enquiring, you admitted that the
said cash has been taken away by you. You have,
therefore, dishonestly misappropriated the Bank’s
Funds amounting to Rs.15,000”.
12. The evidence of Branch Manager B.K.Arora is
clear that on his enquiry when he found the cash was
short, Malviya workman agreed that he had taken away
Rs.15,000 and promised to bring the same. So far as evidence
of management’s witness No.2 Shri R.C.Juhariya, in his
evidence, he says that on 20-6-82, he, Branch Manager
Arora and workman were present. The staff members left
for lunch. Workman told Branch Manager Arora that cash
is balanced and is to be kept inside. Mr.Arora went inside
the cash cabin and started checking the cash and found
Rs.15,000 short. It was told that one packet of Rs.100
denomination and one of Rs.50 denomination was found
less. Workman had deposited the said amount collecting
from staff members and other persons. His evidence in
cross-examination shows on 28-6-82, he had not seen Shri
Malviya taking out cash during working hours. No personal
search of Shri Malviya was taken in his presence for
shortage of cash was brought to his notice. In his statement
before Enquiry Officer, Ist party workman has admitted
that there was shortage of cash of Rs.15,000. He had
borrowed Rs. 7000 from M/s. Sudarshan Oil & chemicals
Industries, Karhi, Rs.11,000 from Shri Fathulal Madhavji
Patidar. The evidence of management’s witness about
shortage of amount and Ist party workman had admitted
that he had taken amount of Rs.15000 cash is not shattered
in cross-examination.
13. Learned counsel for IInd party Shri Shashi relied
on ratio held in case of Union of India Versus B.K.Srivastava
in AIR1998 SC-300. In Para-7 of the judgment, their Lordship
of the Apex Court held that-
“ The Tribunal couldnot sit in appeal against the
orders of the Disciplinary and Appellate Authorities
in exercise of its powers of judicial review.”
Though the observations are made in respect of the
matter decided by CAT, the principles laid down by their
lordship squarely covers the powers of this Tribunal also.
Further reliance is placed in case of Bank of India
versus D.Padmanabhadu and another in 1995 I LLJ P-235.
Their Lordship held—
“The order of dismissal was set aside by the Labour
Court on the grounds that the amount of
misappropriation has been paid back to the customer,
the workman belonged to Scheduled Tribe, the
workman should be given an opportunity to reform
himself. Their Lordship held intentional temporary
retention of money which doesnot belong to a person
is also misappropriation. Mere repayment will act
absorve the liability or misconduct of the respondent
workman. The Bank is the custodian of the money of
the customers and the cashier is a person who deals
with money and he must be more diligent and honest
and justify the trust reposed in him by the bank and
the customers. If once the customers lose confidence
in the dealings, the entire organization suffers and
confidence of the customers is the basis on which
the edifice of the banking system as well.”
4636
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Reliance is also placed on ratio held in case of Union
Versus State Bank of India in Miscellaneous Petition No.
18 of 1987. His Lordship considering the shortage of cash
of Rs. 9009 detected on 27-8-79. After enquiry, punishment
of dismissal was imposed.
Their Lordship in Para-15 of the judgment observed
that there was no justification for the Tribunal to hold that
the confessional statement was made in order to help the
other co-employee, officer-in-charge Shri C.B.Shankar. The
said defence was not accepted by the disciplinary authority
and the appellate authority. In any case, keeping in view all
other circumstances existing on record, the Tribunal
couldnot have substituted its own view on the evidence
adduced in the enquiry.
In the present case, considering the evidence on
record discussed above, I donot find reason to substitute
the punishment of dismissal against Ist party workman.
For above reasons I record my finding in Point No.2 in
Negative.
14. In the result, award is passed as under:-
(1)
The action of the management of IInd party Bank
in dismissing Ist party workman Shri S.K.Malviya
from services is just and legal.
(2)
Reliefs prayed by workman for his reinstatement
with back wages is rejected.
R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 8 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1640-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj bykgkckn cSad
ds çca/ra=k ds laca¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k
lhthvkbZVh@,ylh@vkj@47@05) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh;
ljdkj dks 4&7&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y& 12011@04@2005&vkbZ vkj (ch&II)º
lqefr ldykuh] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 8th July, 2013
S.O. 1640.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Diputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGIT/
LC/R/47/05) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-
cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur now as shown in the Annexure,
in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation
to the management of Allahabad Bank and Their workman
which was received by the Central Government on
04-7-2013
[ No. L- 12011/04/2005-IR(B-II)]
SUMATI SAKLANI, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
JABALPUR
No. CGIT/LC/R/47/05
PRESIDING OFFICER : SHRI R. B. PATLE
General Secretary,
Allahabad Bank Employees Union,
T.T.Nagar, Bhopal
...Workman/Union
Versus
The Asstt. General Manager,
Allahabad Bank,
Near Chetak Bridge, 6,
Gautam Nagar,
Bhopal
...Management
AWARD
Passed on this 18th day of June, 2013
1. As per letter dated 26-5-2005 by the Government
of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is
received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under
Section -10 of I. D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.
L-12011/4/2005 IR(DU). The dispute under reference relates
to :
‘‘ Whether the action of the management of
Allahabad Bank in imposing the punishment of
reduction by two stages in the scale of pay of Shri A.
M. Khan, Cash Clerk is legal and justified? If not to
what relief the concerned workman is entitled ?’’
After receiving reference, notices were issued to the
parties. 1st party workman failed to submit statement of
claim. He is proceeded exparte on 27-10-09.
3. The management submitted Written Statement.
The case as submitted by IInd party management is that
workman A.M. Khan was working as cash clerk in
Allahabad Bank, Bhopal. On 30-7-99, he had received
amount of Rs. 1 Lakh from customer Santosh Jain for
exchange of currency notes of Rs. l 00 denomination to
notes of 500 denomination. The amount of Rs. 1 Lakh was
missing from cash receipt counter of the branch. It amounts
to gross misconduct on part of workman. The chargesheet
was issued to workman on 29-5-00 for negligence in duty,
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4637
The details of charges are given in the para-5 of the Written
Statement. The Departmental Enquiry was initiated against
him. Shri S.G.Vaidya was appointed as Enquiry officer,
Mr. Vijay Dhok was Presenting Officer. Departmental
Enquiry was conducted giving full opportunity to the
delinquent workman. The enquiry was completed, charges
were proved. Disciplinary Authority issued notice,
punishment of reduction of basic pay by 2 stages was
imposed against workman. IInd party management prayed
for rejection of relief prayed by workman.
4. Considering pleadings on record, the points which
arise for my consideration and determination are as under.
My findings are recorded against each of them for the
reasons as below:-
“(i) Whether the action of the In Affirmative
management of Allahabad
Bank in imposing the
punishment of reduction by
two stages in the scale of
pay of Shri A. M. Khan,
Cash Clerk is legal?
(ii) If so, to what relief the Relief prayed by workman
workman is entitled to?” is rejected.
REASONS
5. Though the legality of punishment of reduction
of pay by two stages is referred for adjudication, the
workman has not filed statement of claim neither he has
adduced any evidence. The Written Statement filed by
management and affidavit of evidence of witness Shri Anil
Tondon shows that punishment of reduction of pay was
imposed holding enquiry of the charges that amount of
Rs. 1 Lakh was missing from cash counter while the
delinquent workman was working as cash clerk. The
evidence of witness of management remained
unchallenged. The copy of charge sheet and documents
of Enquiry Proceedings are produced on record. The
evidence of management's witness remained unchallenged.
I do not find any reason to disbelieve his evidence. For
above reasons, I record my finding on Point No.1 in
affirmative.
6. In the result, award is passed as under :-
(1) Action of the management of Allahabad Bank in
imposing the punishment of reduction by two stages
in the, scale of pay of shri A.M.Khan, Cash Clerk is
legal.
(2) Relief prayed by ,workman is rejected.
R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 9 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1641-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj MkbjsdVj]
iQkeZ e'khujh Vsªfuax ,.M VsfLVax bULVhV~;wV ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼
fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd
fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj
ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k lhthvkbZVh@,ylh@vkj@157@97) dks çdkf'kr
djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 28&6&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y& 42012@54@1996&vkbZ vkj (Mh;w)º
lkse ukFk] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 9th July, 2013
S.O. 1641.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Diputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGIT/
LC/R/157/97 of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-
cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in
the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation
to the management of The Director, Farm Machinery
Training and Testing Institute and their workman which
was received by the Central Government on 28-6-2013.
[ No. L- 42012/54/1996-IR(DU)]
SOM NATH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
JABALPUR
No. CGIT/LC/R/157/97
Presiding Officer : SHRI R. B. P A TLE
Smt. Aktari,
W/o Shri Jafer Khan,
Behind Railway Station,
Godi Mohalla, PO Budni,
Distt. Sehore (MP)
...Workman
Versus
The Director,
Farm Machinery Training and
Testing Institute, Tractor Nagar,
Budhni, Distt. Sehore
...Management
AWARD
Passed on this 18th day of March, 2013
1. As per letter dated 30-5-97 by the Government of
India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is
received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under
Section-10 of I.D. Act, 1947 as per Notification No.
L-42012/54/96-IR(DU) . The dispute under reference relates
to :
4638
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
‘‘Whether the action of the management of Central
Farm Machinery Training and Test Institute, Budni
in terminating the services of Smt.Aktari, W/o Shri
Jafer Khan is legal and justified? If not, to what relief
the workman is entitled?’’
2. After receipt of reference and notice to parties,
1st party submitted statement of claim at Page 8/1 to 8/2.
The case of 1st party workman is that she was employed
on daily wages as casual labour in the year 1987 by IInd
party. She rendered continuous service till her termination
in the year 1994. That she had completed 240 days working
in each of the calendar year. That IInd party with ulterior
motive adopted pick and choose policy. The services of
24 employees were regularized. Three of them namely Gulab,
Sivlal and Narmada Prasad were regularized though they
were above 70 years of age. Hiralal, Ashok Kumar and
Suresh who were engaged after 1st party were also
regularized. Services of 1st party were terminated without
notice or paying retrenchment compensation. On above
grounds, 1st party prays for her reinstatement with back
wages.
3. Despite of notices send by different modes to
IInd party including notice under Certificate of posting,
IInd party .failed to give appearance. IInd party was
proceeded exparte on 15-6-07.
4. Considering pleadings on record, the points
which arise for my consideration and determination are as
under. My findings are recorded against each of them for
the reasons as below :—
(i) Whether the termination of
In Negative
services of 1st party/workman
by IInd party management of
Central Farm Machinery
Training and Testing Institute,
Budhni is just and legal?
(ii) If not, what relief the
Ist party is entitled to
workman is entitled to?"
compensation
Rs. 40,000 and other
relief as per final order.
REASONS
5. 1st party/workman is challenging termination of
his services by IInd party. 1st party filed affidavit of
evidence at Page 10/1 to 10/2. 1st party in her affidavit has
stated that she was working with IInd party from 1987 to
1994. She had completed 240 days continuous service
during each of calendar year. That as per the scheme for
regularization of temporary employees in 1993, her services
were not regularized, other junior persons were regularized.
The persons who were overage such as Gulab, Sivlal,
Narmada Prasad were also regularized. She prays for
reinstatement with back wages.
6. The evidence of 1st party/workman remained
unchallenged. IInd party is proceeded exparte, therefore I
find no reason to disbelieve her evidence. 1st party is out
of employment since 1994. She was not served with notice,
no retrenchment compensation was paid. 1st party is a
rustic lady. Considering those facts, in my considered view
instead of reinstatement, compensation Rs. 40,000 would
be appropriate. In addition, 1st party is entitled to one
months wages in lieu of notice and retrenchment
compensation for 7 years service i.e. wages for 105 days.
For above reasons, I record my finding on Point No.1 in
Negative and Point No. 2 accordingly.
7. In the result, award is passed as under:-
‘‘1.Termination of services of 1st party Smt. Kamlabai
by IInd party is illegal.
2. IInd party is directed to pay compensation Rs.
40,000 to 1st party, one month wages in lieu of notice
and 105 days wages towards retrenchment
compensation.’’
The above amount shall be calculated at the rate of
last wage paid to the 1st party. Amount as per above order
be paid within 30 days from the date of award. In case of
default, the amount shall carry 9 % interest from the date
of award till its realization.
R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 9 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1642-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj MkbjsDVj] iQkeZ
e'khujh Vsªfuax ,.M VsfLVax bULVhV~;wV ds çca/ra=k ds laca¼ fu;kstdksa
vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa
dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds
iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k lhthvkbZVh@,ylh@vkj@153@97) dks çdkf'kr
djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 28&6&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y& 42012@56@1996&vkbZ vkj (Mh;w)º
lkseukFk] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 9th July, 2013
S.O. 1642.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Diputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGIT/
LC/R/153/97 of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-
cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in
the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation
to the management of The Director, Farm Machinery
Training and Testing Institute and their workman which
was received by the Central Government on 28-6-2013
[ No. L- 42012/56/1996-IR(DU)]
SOM NATH, Section Officer
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4639
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM-LABOUR COURT,
JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/153/97
Presiding Officer : SHRI R. B. PATLE
Smt. Kamlabai,
W/o Shri Shivaprasad,
Behind Railway Station,
Godi Mohalla, Budni,
Sehore, Distt. (MP)
...Workman
Versus
The Director,
Farm Machinery Training and
Testing Institute, Tractor Nagar,
Budhni, Distt. Sehore
...Management
AWARD
Passed on this 18th day of March, 2013
1. As per letter dated 30-5-97 by the Government of
India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is
received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under
Section -10 of I. D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.
L-42012/56/96-IR(DU) . The dispute under reference relates
to:
‘‘Whether the action of the management of Central
Farm Machinery Training and Testing Institute, Budni
in terminating the services of Smt. Kamlabai W/o
Shri Shivaprasad is legal and justified? If not, to what
relief the workman is entitled?’’
2. After receipt of reference and notice to parties,
1st party submitted statement of claim at Page 5/1 to 5/2.
The case of 1st party workman is that she was employed
on daily wages as casual labour in the year 1987 by IInd
party. She rendered continuous service till her termination
in the year 1994. That she had completed 240 days working
in each of the calendar year. That IInd party with ulterior
motive adopted pick and choose policy. The services of
24 employees were regularized. Three of them namely Gulab,
Sivlal and Narmada Prasad were regularized though they
were above 70 years of age. Hiralal, Ashok Kumar and
Suresh who were engaged after 1st party were also
regularized. Services of 1st party were terminated without
notice or paying retrenchment compensation. On above
grounds, 1st party prays for her reinstatement with back
wages.
3. Despite of notices send by different modes to
Ilnd party including notice under Certificate of posting,
Ilnd party failed to give appearance. Ilnd party was
proceeded exparte on 15-6-07.
4. Considering pleadings on record, the points which
arise for my consideration and determination are as under.
My findings are recorded against each of them for the
reasons as below:-
(i) Whether the termination of
In Negative
services of 1st party/workman
by Ilnd party management of
Central Farm Machinery Training
and Testing Institute, Budhni
is just and legal ?
(ii) If not, what relief the
Ist party is entitled to
workman is entitled to?
compensation
Rs. 40,000 and other
relief as per final order.
REASONS
5. 1st party/workman is challenging termination of
his services by Ilnd party. 1st party filed affidavit of
evidence at Page 8/1 to 8/2. 1st party in her affidavit has
stated that she was working with Ilnd party from 1987 to
1994. She had completed 240 days continuous service
during each of calendar year. That as per the scheme for
regularization of temporary employees in 1993, her services
were not regularized, other junior persons were regularized.
The persons who were overage such as Gulab, Sivlal,
Narmada Prasad were also regularized. She prays for
reinstatement with back wages.
6. The evidence of 1st party/workman remained
unchallenged. IInd party is proceeded exparte, therefore I
find no reason to disbelieve her evidence. 1st party is out
of employment since 1994. She was not served with notice,
no retrenchment compensation was paid. 1st party is an
illiterate lady. Considering those facts, in my considered
view instead of reinstatement, compensation Rs. 40,000
would be appropriate. In addition, 1st party is entitled to
one months wages in lieu of notice and retrenchment
compensation for 7 years service i.e. wages for 105 days.
For above reasons, I record my finding on Point No.1 in
Negative and Point No. 2 accordingly.
7. In the result, award is passed as under :-
‘‘1. Termination of services of 1st party
Smt. Kamlabai by IInd party is illegal.
2. IInd party is directed to pay compensation Rs.
40,000 to 1st party, one month wages in lieu of notice
and 105 days wages towards retrenchment
compensation.’’
The above amount shall be calculated at the rate of
last wage paid to the 1st party. Amount as per above order
be paid within 30 days from the date of award. In case of
4640
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
default, the amount shall carry 9 % interest from the date
of award till its realization.
R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 9 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1643- vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj ;wdks cSad ds
çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/
esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k
lhthvkbZVh@,ylh@vkj@26@94) çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj
dks 26&4&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y&12012@254@93&vkbZ vkj (ch&II)º
lqefr ldykuh] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 9th July, 2013
S.O. 1643.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Diputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGIT/
LC/R/26/94) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-
cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in
the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation
to the management of Uco Bank and Their workman which
was received by the Central Government on 26-4-2013
[ No. L- 12012/254/93-IR(B-II)]
SUMATI SAKLANI, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM-LABOUR COURT,
JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/26/94
Presiding Officer : SHRI R. B. P A TLE
Shri Sunil Kumar Negi,
C/o Shri Satish Govila,
10, Kanti Nagar, Gwalior
...Workman
Versus
Zonal Manager,
UCO Bank, 269/270,
M.P.Nagar,
Zone-II, Bhopal
...Management
AWARD
Passed on this 9th day of April, 2013
1. As per letter dated 2-3-94 by the Government of
India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is
received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under
Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.L-12012/
254/93-IR(B-2) . The dispute under reference relates to:
‘‘Whether the action of the management of UCO
Bank, Bhopal in terminating the services of Shri Sunil
Kumar Negi, Peon with effect from 1-1-1993 is
justified? If not, what relief is the workman entitled
to?’’
2. After receipt of reference, notices were issued to
the parties. 1st party workman filed his statement of claim
at page 3/1 to 3/7. The case of workman is that he was
working on daily wages @ Rs.15 with UCO Bank from
1-11-98. That he was performing work of the peon in 1989,
he was paid wages Rs. 25 per day, in 1990 Rs. 43 per day.
He was paid bonus of the year 1990-91, 1991-92. That he
was in continuous service of the IInd party. He had worked
more than 240 days every year. That as per circular dated
19-10-89, he had submitted application on 29-11-89 for
appointment on permanent post. The said application was
forwarded to IInd party. His application was placed before
the Panel. Thereafter he was paid wages Rs.43 per day
trom July, 1990. Other employee Om Prakash was also
paid wages Rs. 43 per day.
3. He submits that his services were illegally
terminated without notice from 1-1-93. He was not paid
compensation. He filed conciliation proceedings and
dispute has been referred. He has reitreated that his
services are terminated in violation of Section 25-F & G of
LD.Act. He prays for his reinstatement with back wages.
4. IInd party submitted Written Statement at Page
8/1 to 8/3. IInd party raised preliminary objection that the
petition is filed against officials of the Bank which is not
tenable. That 1st party workman was engaged as casual
worker by UCO Bank, Gwalior Branch. He was not engaged
as a peon against permanent post. Therefore he is not
entitled to reliefs as claimed by him. That settlement has
arrived between management Bank and the Union on
12-10-89 whereby a scheme was formulated to observe
those eligible casual workers who has worked for a period
of 240 days or more between 12-10-86 to 11-10-89. The
scheme was circulated. The casual workers having
minimum age of 18 and maximum 26 years on date of initial
engagement were eligible for absorption. That the 1st party
workman was not fulfilling eligibility conditions therefore
he could not be observed. It is further submitted that the
1st party workman was engaged on daily wages, he had
not completed 240 days services. The wages were paid
Rs.18, 20, 24 and 25. From July 90, wages paid Rs.43 to the
1st party workman. The IInd party denied that 1st party
was its employee. Workman had not completed 240 days
continuous service. Therefore there was no question of
termination of his services. All other contention of
workman are denied. That notice was not required to be
given to the workman. That Om Prakash Shakya found
eligible for absorption. It is denied that workman had
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4641
acquired right to be absorbed in regular employment.
Management prayed for rejection of claim of 1st party
workman.
5. 1st party workman filed rejoinder at Page 9/1 to
9/2. The contentions raised in the Written Statement of
IInd party are denied. The workman contended that he
had completed 240 days continuous service. He had
acquired status of permanent employee as he was not a
casual labour. It is denied that he is not working as peon.
That in September 1990, Divisional Manager had told that
he was included in the panel for absorption and wages
Rs. 43 per day were paid to him. He claims that he had
completed 18 years of age at the time of appointment as
such he is entitled to absorption in service.
6. Considering pleadings on record, the points which
arise for my consideration and determination are as under.
My findings are recorded against each of them for the
reasons as below:-
(i) Whether the action of the
In Negative
management of UCO Bank,
Bhopal in terminating the
services of Shri Sunil Kumar
Negi, Peon with effect from
1-1-1993 is legal?
(ii) If so, to what relief the
1st party workman is
workman is entitled to?" entitled to compensation
Rs.40,000, notice pay
equal to 30 days wages,
retrenchment compen-
sation equal to 60 days
wages at the rate of
Rs. 43 per day.
REASONS
In his statement of claim, 1st party workman claims
that he is entitled to absorption with the Bank as per
settlement between the Union and the Bank dated
19-10-89. Reference does not include said part of the claim
of the 1st party workman. The contentions of the workman
in that regard are beyond the scope of reference. The
reference is made only about legality of the termination of
the services of Ist party workman and secondly reliefs. In
his rejoinder, workman states that he had completed 18
years age at the time of appointment. As per the statement
of claim, he was engaged on 1-11-88, he was paid wages at
different rates. Even he was paid bonus for year 1990-91
and 1991-92. 1st party workman has filed affidavit of his
evidence covering all his material contentions in statement
of claim. In his cross-examination, he says that he was
engaged on work in Bank in November 1986 by
management, appointment order was not given to him. He
had not submitted application in writing. That he was
doing all the works in the Bank. He was not signing the
muster register. He was engaged on daily wage basis. His
wages were paid under voucher. He was working in the
Bank from 1986 to 1993. That Bank had not given any
certificate. There was settlement between Bank and the
Union for absorption of daily wage employees. He had
submitted application Exhibit W-l. In Exhibit W-l, his date
of birth is shown as 15-8-1971. His date of engagement is
shown as 1-11-88. His evidence is not consistent with
said document. If Document Exhibit W -1 is accepted, he
had not completed 18 years of age at the time of his initial
engagement. Document Exhibit W -4 certificate of passing
school examination shows his date of birth as 15-8-71.
The document Exhibit W -10 shows that 1st party workman
was engaged as casual worker. The scheme for absorption
was formulated. The age of absorption is minimum 18 years
and maximum 26 years. It is clear from the evidence that
the workman did not fulfill the conditions for appointment.
The copy of the scheme is produced at Exhibit W -2. The
eligibility criteria for absorption is working of 240 days
with or without break for a period of 3 year and age between
18 to 26 years. The scheme for absorption of the workman
is beyond the terms of reference. Besides it, the workman
doesnot fulfill the age criteria as per the scheme for
absorption. Therefore said claim of the 1st paprty cannot
be accepted.
8. Ist party workman claims that he had completed
240 days continuous service during each of the year. His
services are terminated without issuing notice or payment
of compensation etc. IInd party management has
contended that workman had not completed 240 days
service. He was working as casual labour as per exigencies.
There was no need to give notice. The controversy
revolves around whether the workman completed 240 days
continuous service. In the affidavit of evidence, workman
says that he was continuously working in the Bank from
1-11-88 to 1-1-93. However in his cross-examination he
says that he was working in the Bank from November
86. The contrary suggestions are denied by the 1st party
workman. Learned counsel for IInd party Mr. Bhattacharjee
submits that the burden lies on workman to prove that he
was working for 240 days preceding his termination.
“Reliance is placed in ratio held in case of Range
Forest Officer Versus S.T.Hadimani in 2002 Supreme Court
Cases (L&S) 367. Their Lordship of the apex court dealing
with onus and manner of proof for completion of length of
continuous service held - where the workman claims that
he had worked for 240 days in the year preceding his
termination was denied by the employer, it was for the
claimant to lead evidence to that effect. It was held that
workman' s affidavit was not sufficient evidence for that
purpose.”
“Similar view was held in case of Surendranagar
District Panchayat Versus Dahyabhai Amarsingh in 2006
Supreme Court Cases (L&S) 38. In said case, Lordship of
the Apex Court held that burden of proof lies on the
4642
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
workman. It is for the workman to adduce evidence apart
from examining himself or filing an affidavit to prove the
said factum. Such evidence may be in form of receipt of
salary or wages for 240 days or record of his appointment
or engagement for that year to show that he has worked
with the employer for 240 days or examination of a
co-worker.”
9. Management's witness Shri S.C.Jain has stated
that workman had not completed 240 days continuous
service preceding his termination. In his cross-examination,
management's witness says that the workman was paid
bonus for 1 to 2 years. At fag end of his cross-examination,
management witness says that bonus of 2 year was paid
to the workman. The documents about payment of bonus
paid to the 1st party workman is produced by management
as Exhibit M-2. The bonus of Rs. 1307.49 was paid for 365
days at the rate of Rs.43 per day. It corroborates evidence
of 1st party that he was working for more than 240 days in
the IInd party management.
10. 1st party workman is discontinued without
issuing notice or paying compensation. As workman has
completed 240 days continuous service, his evidence is
corroborated by document Exhibit M-2, the termination of
services of 1st party workman is in violation of Section
25-F of I.D.Act.
11.The question is to what relief the workman is
entitled. From cross-examination of workman, it is clear
that he was not appointed following proper procedure. He
is also not entitled for absorption as per the scheme
between the management and the Union as he did not
fulfill eligibility for absorptions his age was less than 18
years at the time of his initial appointment.
12. Learned counsel for management Shri Bhattacharjee
relies on ratio held in case of Himanshu Kumar Vidyarthi
and others versus State of Bihar and others reported in
1997 Supreme Court Cases (L&S) 1079.
“Their Lordship held the main grievance of petitioner
is that termination of their service under violation of
Section 25-F of I.D. Act, 1947. The question for
consideration therefore is whether the petitioner can be
said workman within the meaning of Section 25-F of I.D.
Act. That every department of Government cannot be
treated as industry dispensing with services of persons
engaged on daily wages in a government department
therefore is not a retrenchment.”
The ratio held in the case has no bearing to
controversy between parties. No evidence is adduced by
management that it is not covered as an industry.
Considering oral and documentary evidence on record as
1st party workman was not appointed following prescribed
procedure, he doesnot fulfill eligibility for absorption. 1st
party workman is not entitled for reinstatement with full
back wages. Instead compensation would meet the ends
of justice. In my considered view, 1st party workman
working with IInd party management from November 88 to
1-1-93 had completed 4 years service is entitled to
retrenchment compensation for period of 4 years
completed service i.e. equal to 60 days wages. One month
wages in lieu of notice and compensation Rs.40,000 in lieu
of reinstatement. For above reasons, I record my finding
on Point No.I in Negative.
13. Point No. 2 :— 1st party workman is entitled to
compensation Rs. 40,000 etc.
14. In the result, award is passed as under:-
(1) The action of the IInd party management in
terminating the services of Ist party workman
Shri Sunil Kumar Negi w.e.f. 1-1-93 is illegal.
(2) IInd party shall pay compensation Rs.40,000,
notice pay equal to 30 days wages, retrenchment
compensation equal to 60 days wages at the rate of
Rs. 43 per day.
Amount as per above shall be paid within 30 days
from the date of award. In case of default, amount shall
carry interest 9% per annum till its realization.
R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 9 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1644-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947
(1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj
¯lfMdsV cSad ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa
ds chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj
vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] y[kumQ ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k
147@2001) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks
04&07&2013 dks izkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y& 12011@113@2001&vkbZ vkj (ch&II)º
lqefr ldykuh] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 9th July, 2013
S.O. 1644.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (I.D. No. 147/
2001) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Lucknow now as shown in the Annexure, in
the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to
the management of Syndicate Bank and their workmen,
which was received by the Central Government on
04-07-2013.
[No. L-12011/113/2001-IR(B-II)]
SUMATI SAKLANI, Section Officer
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4643
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL
TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
LUCKNOW
PRESENT : Dr. MANJU NIGAM, Presiding Officer
I.D. No. 147/2001
Ref. No. L-12011/113/2001-IR (B-II) dated:
7-09-2001
BETWEEN
The State Secretary,
Syndicate Bank Empls. Union, U.P. State Committee
211, Vinay Place, Ashok Marg,
Lucknow (U.P.) -226001
(Espousing cause of Shri Ashok Kumar)
AND
The Dy. General Manager
Syndicate Bank
Zonal Office, Meerut Wing
Bhawani Puram University
Meerut (U.P.)
ORDER
1. By order No. L-12011/113/2001-IR (B-II) dated :
07-09-2001 and its subsequent corrigendum dated 21-01-
2002 the Central Government in Ministry of Labour, New
Delhi in exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-
section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) referred this
industrial dispute between the State Secretary, Syndicate
Bank Empls. Union U.P. State committee, 211, Vinay Place,
Ashok Marg, Lucknow (U.P.) and the Dy. General Manager,
Syndicate Bank, Zonal Office, Meerut Wing, Bhawani
Puram University, Meerut (U.P.) for adjudication.
2. The reference under adjudiaction is :
“Whether the Action of Syndicate Bank in
dismissing Sh. Ashok Kumar from services vide
order dated 20-04-2000 is just, fair and legal? If
not, what relief he is entitled to ?”
3. It is admitted case of the parties that the workman,
Ashok Kumar was working as Clerk in the Alipur Branch of
the Bank when he was placed under suspension vide order
dated 11-01-95 and subsequently, was issued a major
penalty charge sheet dated 01-05-98 for alleged gross
misconduct. Initially Shri Prem Raj and later on Shri R.K.
Garg was appointed as Enquiry Officer, who submitted his
enquiry report dated 30-11-99 before the disciplinary
authority with finding that the charges leveled against the
workman were found proved. The Disciplinary Authority,
on the basis of findings of the Enquiry Officer, issued a
Show Cause Notice dated 15-02-2000 to the workman and
proposed the punishment of 'Dismissal from the service of
the Bank without notice' and after granting an opportunity
for personal hearing inflicted the said punishment vide his
order dated 20-04-2000. The aggrieved workman preferred
an appeal, which was rejected by the Appellate Authority
vide order dated 15-09-2000.
4. It has been alleged by the workman's union
that there was flagrant denial of natural justice to the
workman in course of the enquiry, in as much as he was not
provided certain documents, requested by him during the
course of enquiry which cause prejudice to him; therefore,
the domestic enquiry is liable to be vitiated and the action
of Syndicate Bank in dismissing the workman from the
service of the Bank vide order dated 20-04-2000 be declared
unjust, unfair and illegal and the workman be reinstated
with full back wages and other consequential benefits.
5. The management of the Bank in its written
statement has denied the allegations of the workman's
union and has defended its domestic proceedings with
submission that the workman had been afforded all
opportunity given under rules the principles of natural
justice were fully complied with; hence, there is no anomaly
with it; and accordingly, has prayed that domestic enquiry
proceedings conducted by it may be upheld and the action
of the Bank vide order dated 20-04-2000 be declared just,
fair and legal without any benefit to the workman concerned.
6. After completion of the pleadings of the parties,
following preliminary issues were framed in the presence
of the parties vide order dated 10-02-2009.
(i) Kya vibhagiya jaanch naisargik nayay ke niyamon
ke anuroop the athwa nahi/trutipurn hai athwa
nahi?
(ii) Kya jaanch adhikaari dwara di gai aakhya
durahgrahpurna (perverse) hai? Athva nahi?
The parties were called upon to adduce their
evidence on preliminary issues. The parties filed
documents in support of their respective case and adduced
oral evidence. The workman examined himself; whereas
the management examined Shri Prem Raj and Shri R.K. Garg,
the Enquiry Officers in support of their case. The parties
availed opportunity to cross-examine each other witnesses.
Both the parties forwarded oral arguments on preliminary
issues.
7. After hearing the parties’ authorized
representatives of the parties and going through entire
material available on record, following orders were passed
on preliminary issues vide order dated 21-08-2012:
“The disciplinary enquiry was conducted in
accordance with the principles of natural justice and
the workman was afforded all reasonable opportunity
4644
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
to defend himself; and also, the findings of the
Enquiry Officer does not appear to be perverse. As
such, both the issues are decided in favour of the
management. The parties are called upon to forward
their argument regarding quantum of punishment
vide impugned order dated 20-04-2000 on
05-10-2012”.
8. On the date fixed for arguments the workman
remained absent. However, he was present along with his
authorized representative, the management was
represented by Shri P.K. Jha, Manager (HR/SR). The parties
forwarded their oral argument on the point of quantum of
punishment under Section 11 A of the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947.
9. Heard, parties and perused entire material
available on record.
10. It has been contended by the authorized
representative of the workman that the Labour has ample
power under section 11-A of the I.D. Act to substitute a
lesser punishment, taking into consideration the facts and
circumstances of the case. It was submitted that principle
of proportionality calls for interference of this Court into
the punishment imposed by the management i.e. of
dismissal. It has relied on Joseph Solomon vs. Presiding
Officer, Labour Court, U.P., Dehradun & another 2012 (134)
FLR 424.
11. Per contra, the management has argued that the
Court cannot sit in appeal or it cannot re-appreciate the
evidence relied before Inquiry Officer; in as much as it
cannot alter the order or punishment. It was submitted
that the scope of invoking the powers given under Section
11 A of the Act, by the Labour Court is confined to the
condition that the Court should interfere with the order of
punishment when it is disproportionate with respect to
the misconduct committed or it is harsh. It has further
been argued that in the instant case the workman was
given charge sheet for committing misconduct of ‘doing
acts prejudicial to the interest of the bank’ i.e.
misappropriation of the Bank’s money; and was penalized
with dismissal after conducting a thorough inquiry and
this Tribunal vide its order dated 21-08-2012 has found
that “the disciplinary enquiry was conducted in accordance
with the principles of natural justice and the workman was
afforded all reasonable opportunity to defend himself; and
also, the findings of the Enquiry Officer do not appear to
be perverse”; hence there is no scope for this Tribunal to
interfere with the quantum of punishment order as the
same is well proportionate order, as the workman was
punished for proved gross misconduct i.e.
misappropriation. It has submitted that the
misappropriation of Bank’s money speaks ill of the honesty
and integrity of the workman concerned. This is definitely
an act prejudicial to the interest of the Bank. Such
employees cannot be kept on the rolls of the Bank. It has
relied on Bank of India vs Vishwa Mohan (1998) Lab IC
2514.
The bank management has further submitted that
the Bank being a financial institution dealing with the
public money and the employees of the Bank are required
to exhibit utmost honesty and integrity in day to day
transaction/functioning. The act of dishonesty or fraud
or misappropriation constitute misconduct of serious
nature warranting penalty of dismissal. As the charges
leveled against the workman were of serious/grave in
nature, which were duly proved in the inquiry, therefore,
the action of the management is justified. It has been
argued by the bank that the aforesaid act of the workman
has shaken the confidence of the bank in him and he is not
fit to be kept in the services of the Bank, therefore deserves
no’ interference into the quantum of punishment by this
Tribunal. It has relied on Municipal Committee, Bandugarh
vs. Kishan Baha and others 1996 Lab IC 1050.
12. I have given my thoughtful consideration to
the rival contentions of the authorized representatives of
the parties and perused case laws relied on by them.
13. In the instant case the workman was charge
sheeted with the allegation of ‘doing acts prejudicial to
the interest of bank vide clause No. 19.5 (j) of Bipartite
Settlement; and during Disciplinary Proceedings, it has
come out that the workman misappropriated an amount of
Rs. 50,000. The inquiry and its findings were upheld by
this Tribunal vide order dated 21-08-2012, holding that the
disciplinary enquiry was conducted in accordance with
the principles of natural justice and the workman was
afforded all reasonable opportunity to defend himself; and
also, that the findings of the Enquiry Officer does not
appear to be perverse’. Hence, after decision of the
preliminary issues in the favour of the management, the
workman has pleaded that the punishment imposed upon
him is disproportionate and this Tribunal should interfere
into it within the provisions providing under Section 11 A
of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
14. Hon’ble Apex Court in B. C. Chayurvedi v.
Union of India, (1995) 6 SCC 749 while discussing about
the scope of judicial review, in disciplinary matters, has
observed as under:
“The High Court/Tribunal, while exercising the
power of judicial review, cannot normally substitute
its won conclusion on penalty and impose some
other penalty. If the punishment imposed by the
disciplinary authority or the appellate authority
shocks the conscience of the High Court/Tribunal,
it would appropriately mould the relief, either
directing the disciplinary/appellate authority to
reconsider the penalty imposed, or to shorten the
litigation, it may itself, in exceptional and rare cases,
imposed appropriate punishment with cogent
reasons in support thereof. ”
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4645
In DG, RPF Vs. Sai Babu (2003) 4 SCC 331, Hon’ble
Apex Court has observed that :
“6 ............. Normally, the punishment imposed by a
disciplinary authority should not be disturbed by
the High Court or a tribunal except in appropriate
cases that too only after reaching a conclusion that
the punishment imposed is grossly or shockingly
disproportionate, after examining all the relevant
factors including the nature of charges proved
against, the past conduct, penalty imposed earlier,
the nature of duties assigned having due regard to
their sensitiveness, exactness expected of an
discipline required to be maintained, and the
department/establishment which the delinquent
person concerned works.”
In United Commercial Bank vs. P. C. Kakkar (2003) 4
SCC 364 Hon’ble Apex Court on review of a long line of
cases and the principles of judicial review of administrative
action under English law summarized the legal position in
the following words :
“11. The common thread running through in all these
decisions is that the court should not interfere with
the administrators’ decision unless it was illogical
or suffers from procedural impropriety or was
shocking to the conscience of the court, in the sense
that it was in defiance of logic or moral standards. In
view of what has been stated in Wednesbury case
the court would not go into the correctness of the
choice made by the administrator open to him and
the court should not substitute its decision to that
of the administrator. The scope of judicial review is
limited to the deficiency in decision-making process
and not the decision.
12. To put it differently, unless the punishment
imposed by the disciplinary authority or the appellate
authority shocks the conscience of the court/
tribunal, there is no scope for interference. Further,
to shorten litigation it may, in exceptional and rare
cases, impose appropriate punishment by recording
cogent reasons in support thereof.”
In Union of India vs. S. S. Ahluwalia (2007) 7 SCC
257 Hon’ble Supreme Court reiterated the legal position
as follows:
“8 ............ The scope of judicial review in the matter
of imposition of penalty as a result of disciplinary
proceedings is very limited. The court can interfere
with the punishment only if it finds the same to be
shockingly disproportionate to the charges found
to be proved.”
In State of Meghalaya v. Mecken Singh N. Marak
(2008) 7 SCC 580 Hon’ble Supreme Court stated that :
“The punishment imposed by the disciplinary
authority or the appellate authority unless shocking
to the conscience of the court, cannot be subjected
to judicial review.
15. Hon’ble Apex Court in Administrator, Union
Territory of Dadra and Nagar Haveli vs. Gulbhia M. Lad
(2010) 2 SCC (L&S) 101 has observed that
“The legal position is fairly well settled that while
exercising the power of judicial review, the High
Court or a Tribunal cannot interfere with the
discretion exercised by the disciplinary authority,
and/or on appeal the appellate authority with regard
to the imposition of punishment unless such
discretion suffers from illegality or material
procedural irregularity or that would shock the
conscience of the court/tribunal. The exercise of
discretion in imposition of punishment by the
disciplinary authority or appellate authority is
dependent on host of factors such as gravity of
misconduct, past conduct, the nature of duties
assigned to the delinquent, responsibility of the
position that the delinquent holds, previous penalty,
if any, and the discipline required to be maintained
in the department or establishment he works.
Ordinarily the court or the tribunal would not
substitute its opinion on reappraisal of facts.”
16. In the instant case the workman, was deputed
to bring inward case remittance of Rs. 50,000 from Sardhana
Branch and was required to deposit the inward cash
remittance with Alipur Branch on 11-10-1994. After having
taken the case remittance of Rs. 50,000 from Sardhana
Branch the workman did not deposit the cash with Alipur
Branch, instead, he falsely reported that on his way back
to Alipur Branch while he was travelling in a Truck, the
cash was looted/robbed from him. Whereas subsequent
investigation/findings by the Police Authorities revealed
that no evidence was found which could lead to show
that incidence of loot etc. had taken place as stated by the
workman. Thereafter, it was construed that the workman
misappropriated a sum of Rs. 50,000 received by him from
Sardhana Branch.
The Bank management has argued that the
misappropriation of the Bank’s money speaks ill of the
honesty and integrity of the workman concerned. This is
definitely an act prejudicial to the interest of the Bank,
which leads to loss of faith in the workman. In Air India
Corporation Bombay vs. V. A. Ravellow 1972 (25) FLR 319
(SC) it has been observed that :
“Once the employer has lost the confidence in the
employee and the bona fide loss of confidence is
affirmed, the order of punishment must be
considered to be immune from challenge, for the
reason that discharging the office of trust and
confidence requires absolute integrity, and in a case
4646
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
of loss of confidence, reinstatement cannot be
directed.”
In Knhaiyalal Agarwal and Others vs. Factory
Manager, Gwaliar Sugar Co. Ltd. AIR 2001 SC 3645 Hon’ble
Apex court laid down the test for loss of confidence to
find out as to whether there was bona fide loss of
confidence in the employee, observing that:
“(i) the workman is holding the position of trust and
confidence; (ii) by abusing such position, be
commits act which results in forfeiting the same;
and (iii) to continue him in service/establishment
would be embarrassing. the inconvenient to the
employee, or would be detrimental to the discipline
or security of the establishment. Loss of confidence
cannot be subjective, based upon the mind of the
management. Objective facts which would lead to a
definite inference of apprehension in the mind of
the management, regarding trust worthiness or
reliability of the employee, must be alleged and
proved.”
In State Bank of India and Another v. Bela Bagchi
and Others AIR 2005 SC 3272, repelled the contention that
even if by the misconduct of the employee the employer
does not suffer any financial loss, he can be removed
frorn service in a case of loss of confidence. Further in
A.P. SRTC v. Raghuda Shiva Sankar Prasad AIR 2007 SC
152 Hon’ble Apex court has observed that in case of theft,
the quantum of theft is not import and what is important is
the loss of confidence of employer in employee.
17. Thus, the Bank being a financial institution
dealing with the public money, the employees of the Bank
are required to exhibit utmost honesty and integrity in day
to day transaction/functioning. The act of dishonesty or
fraud or misappropriation lowers down the reputation of
Bank in public. The public loose their confidence in Bank,
which affects Bank’s business and finally the national
economy.
18. Hon’ble Apex Court in (2011) 1 Supreme Court
Cases (L&S) 721 has observed that:
“7. It is now well settled that the courts will not act
as an appellate court and reassess the evidence led
in the domestic enquiry, nor interfere on the ground
that another view is possible on the material on
record. If the inquiry has been fairly and properly
held and the findings are based on evidence, the
question of adequacy of the evidence or the reliable
nature of the evidence will not be grounds for
interfering with the findings in departmental
enquiries. Therefore the courts will not interfere with
findings of fact recorded in departmental inquiries,
except where such findings are based on no evidence
or where they are clearly perverse. The test to find
out perversity is to see whether a tribunal acting
reasonably could have arrived at such conclusion
or findings, on the material on record. The courts
will however interfere with the findings in
disciplinary matters, if principles of natural justice
or statutory regulations have been violated or if the
order is found to be arbitrary, capricious, mala fide
or based on extraneous considerations.”
19. In the instant case the charge of
misappropriation of the Bank’s money was found to be
proved and principles of natural justice were properly
observed while conducting the departmental inquiry; and
also the findings of the Inquiry Officer were not found to
be perverse. Therefore, under the facts and the
circumstances and considering the laws, there is no
justification in interfering with the punishment imposed
upon the workman by the Disciplinary Authority for
proved gross misconduct of ‘misappropriation’.
Accordingly, the workman is not entitled for any relief.
20. Award as above.
LUCKNOW,
20th June, 2013.
Dr. MANJU NIGAM, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 9 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1645-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj cSad vkWiQ
bafM;k ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k
lhthvkbZVh@,ylh@vkj@2@92) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh;
ljdkj dks 27&6&2013 dks izkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y& 12012@345@91&vkbZvkj (ch&II)º
lqefr ldykuh] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 9th July, 2013
S.O. 1645.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (No. CGIT/LC/R/
2/92) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour
Court, Jabalpur now as shown in the Annexure, in the
Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the
management of Bank of India and their workman, which
was received by the Central Government on 27-6-2013.
[No. L-12012/345/91-IR (B-II)]
SUMATI SAKLANI, Section Officer
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4647
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
JABALPUR
No. CGIT/LC/R/2/92
Presiding Officer : SHRI R. B. P ATLE
Shri Munnalal Batham,
S/o Shri Narayan Prasad Batham,
1/173, Sardarpura,
Behind Kamal Talkies, Ujjain
.....Workman
Versus
Regional Manager,
Bank of India,
18, Shanku Marg,
Freeganj, Ujjain
....Management
AWARD
Passed on this 11th day of June, 2013
1. As per letter dated 31.12.1991 by the Government
of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is
received. The reference is made to this tribunal under
Section 10 of I.D. Act, 1947 as per Notification No.
L-12012/345/91-IR (B-II). The dispute under reference
relates to :
“ Whether the action of the management of Bank
of India, Ujjain in terminating the services of
Shri Munnalal Batham, S/o Shri Narayan Prasad is
justified? If not, what relief is the workman entitled
to?”
2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to
the parties. 1st party workman filed Statement of claim at
Page 2/1 to 2/3. The case of 1st party workman is that he
was appointed as peon on 12-2-80. He belong to Schedule
Caste. Account was opened from 3-3-1980. His wages were
deposited in said account. He had submitted medical
certificate about his fitness of the Bank. He was paid wages
Rs. 13.50 per day. He further submits that he had acquired
eligibility for appointment on regular basis. He should
have been given appointment in 1983-84. That his services
were terminated from 26-6-84. That termination of his
services is against principles of natural justice. He was
not paid retrenchment compensation. 3 months notice was
not given to him for terminating services. He was not paid
notice pay, retrenchment compensation was not paid.
Principles of last come 1st go was not followed. He submits
that termination of his service is in violation of Article
16(4), 335 and 46 of the Constitution. That Regulation 507
of Sastry Award is violated. On such contentions, 1st party
workman prays for his reinstatement with consequential
benefits.
3. IInd party filed Written Statement at Page 9/1 to
9/6. According to IInd party, Ist party workman was working
as a Badli Sepoy, his name was included in panel of Badli
Sepoy after it was sponsored by the Employment
Exchange. That the management of Bank used to keep
panels of badly employees. They can be engaged for
temporary period as and when required in leave vacancy
of permanent employee. That workman was knowing about
the same. He had worked in the Bank for few days during
the year March 1982 to June 84 as Badli Peon. It is further
contented that the workman was not interested to work as
badly employee. The management cannot give regular
employment as he has not completed requisite number of
days for regularization of his services. Instead of coming
to the Bank as Badli employee, he stopped coming to the
work. After proceeding before the ALC, W.P. No. 62/87
was filed. Said Writ petition was dismissed. Since June
1984, the workman was not reporting to work as Badli
employee.
4. IInd party denies that workman was engaged on
the post of peon. Rather it is submitted that he was engaged
as Badli Sepoy. The workman was not satisfied with his
working as Badli Sepoy in leave vacancy. The regular
employment could not be provided to him. The workman
himself stopped coming to work as Badli sepoy. His name
was in the panel. Violation of Regulation 507 of Sastry
Award or violation of Section 25-F of I.D. Act is denied.
2nd party prayed for rejection of claim of Ist party .
5. Ist party filed rejoinder at page 13/1 to 13/2 and
reiterated his contentions that he was working on the post
of peon from 1984. He further submits that Naval Kishore
Raikwar, Vijay Kumar Jain, Mahendra Naagar, Ramdas
Chowdhary junior to him were working with the IInd party.
His services were illegally terminated.
6. Considering pleadings on record, the points
which arise for my consideration and determination are as
under. My findings are recorded against each of them for
the reasons as below:—
(i)
Whether the action of the
Services of workman
management of Bank of
are not terminated, he
India, Ujjain in terminating
was working as Badli
the services of Shri Munnalal
peon.
Batham, S/o Shri Narayan
Prasad is legal?
(ii) If so, to what relief the
Relief prayed by
workman is entitled to?
workman is rejected.
REASONS
7. Workman is challenging termination from service
by Bank of India, Ujjain. In his statement of claim, he has
contented that he was not issued notice, retrenchment
compensation was not paid, notice pay was not paid.
Those contentions of workman are denied by the
management. The management contends that the workman
4648
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
was working as Badli peon, his name was sponsored from
Employment Exchange. The workman was not interested
in working as Badli peon. The Bank could not regularize
his services as required number of working days were not
completed.
8. Workman filed affidavit of his evidence at Page
20/1 to 20/3. He has stated on oath that he was selected by
Committee on 12-2-1980. He was appointed as peon. He
was paid wages at Rs.13.50 per day. The wages were
deposited in account opened in the Bank. He was not
given increment in 1983-84. That his services were
terminated without notice, no retrenchment compensation
was paid, permission was also not obtained. In his cross-
examination, the workman has stated that he was working
as Badli employee in the Bank. The Bank had approved
him as Badli employee. He has stated that his services
were terminated from 26-6-84. He has admitted his
signatures on documents R-4/17, 18, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14,
20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 39. It did not recollect the
month of 1982 he was working in the Bank. He has stated
that he was working for 10-15 days in the Bank in leave
vacancy. He also admits that he was not in continuous
service of the bank. He was not happy with the working as
Badli employee in the bank. In his further cross-
examination, he admits that his wages were deposited in
Bank Account. From his evidence, it is clear that workman
was engaged as Badli peon in Bank.
9. Learned counsel for Ist party tried to emphasize
that other Badli employee junior to the workman working
in the bank were appointed on regular basis. The evidence
of cross-examination of management’s witness Shri Joshi
was brought to my notice. In para-18 of his cross-
examination Mr. Joshi has stated that juniors to the
workman were made permanent as they had worked for
more days. That the list is not corrected . The witness was
unable to till the name of Ist party workman was removed
from panel of Badli employee. He admits that in Exhibit M-1
Vijendra and Naagar were permanently appointed. They
were junior. The evidence of management’s witness Gopal
Verma and Joshi is on point that Ist party workman was
working as Badli. He was not appointed on regular basis.
That name of the workman was also continued on panel of
Badly peon till August, 1984. From evidence on record, it
is clear that workman was not appointed on regular basis.
The terms of reference are whether the termination of
services of Ist party workman is justified. The terms of
reference does not include that other junior Badli
employees were on regular appointment and the Ist party
workman was illegally terminated.
10. Learned counsel for IInd party Mr. Shashi relies
on ratio held in
“Case of Karnataka State Road Transport
Corporation Versus S. G. Kotturappa and another in
2005-3-Supreme Court Cases 409. Their Lordship held
that casual employment/labour Badli worker held so
long as worker remains Badli worker, he does not
enjoy a status and his services may be discontinued
like that of a probationer if he is not found suitable
for the job for which his services were utilised as
Badli. A dispute as regards purported wrongful
termination of services can be raised only if such
termination takes place in violation of mandatory
provisions of the statute or terms of contract
governing the services of the Badli worker
concerned.”
11. From evidence of Ist party workman, it is not
established that he had not completed 240 days
continuous service prior to the alleged termination,
evidence of the workman in cross-examination shows that
he was working for 10-15 days in a month during leave
vacancy. His evidence is not clear for how many days he
was working prior to the termination. Therefore violation
of Section 25-F of I.D. Act cannot be established.
12. Learned counsel for Ist party Mr. Gehlod relied
on ratio held in-
“Case of Samishta Dube versus City Board Etawah
and another in 1999 (81) FLR 746. The above cited
case was in respect of violation of 6-P, 6-N of U.P.
lndustrial Disputes Act is provided ordinarily
employees are retrenched employees following
principles of last come 1st go.”
Reliance is also placed by Shri Gehlod in ratio held
in case or Regional Manager, SBI versus Rakesh
Kumar Tewari reported in 2006-108-FLR-733. Their
Lordship held provisions of Section 25-G, B and H
does not require continuous employment of
workman within meaning of Section 25-B before he
could have been retrenched.
The ratio cannot be applied to present case at hand
as workman was not working as regular employee with the
IInd party Bank. He was working as Badli peon after his
name was sponsored from Employment Exchange. As per
ratio held in case of State Road Transport Corporation
Versus S.G. Kotturappa and another in 2005-3-Supreme
Court Cases 409 discussed above, the status and right of
Badli worker is as that of a probationer. Therefore the ratio
held in the above cited case cannot be applied to case at
hand. As the workman was not working regular employee
as Badli peon, the protection under Section 25-F, G and H
cannot be invoked by the workman. For the above reasons,
I record my finding on Point No.1 in Affirmative.
13. In the result, award is passed as under:—
“1.
The action of the IInd party management in
terminating the services of Shri Munnalal
Batham, S/o Shri Narayan Prasad is legal.
2.
Relief prayed by workman is rejected.”
R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4649
ubZ fnYyh] 9 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1646-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj iatkc us'kuy
cSad ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k
lhthvkbZVh@,ylh@vkj@62@2001) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh;
ljdkj dks 27-6-2013 dks izkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y& 12012@192@2000&vkbZ vkj(ch&II)º
lqefr ldykuh] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 9th July, 2013
S.O. 1646.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGIT/
LC/R/62/2001) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur now as shown in
the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the
employers in relation to the management of Punjab National
Bank and their workmen, which was received by the Central
Government on 27-6-2013.
[No. L-12012/192/2000-IR(B-II)]
SUMATI SAKLANI, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
JABALPUR
No. CGIT/LC/R/62/2001
Presiding Officer : SHRI R. B. P ATLE
Shri Narendra Chourasia,
S/o Tejilal Chourasia,
Near Chandsi Dava Khana,
Nehru Road,
Seoni(MP)
. . . Workman
Versus
The Branch Manager,
Punjab National Bank, Seoni Branch,
Distt. Seoni (MP)
. . . Management
AWARD
Passed on the 13th day of June, 2013
1. As per letter dated 22-3-2001 by the Government
of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is
received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under
Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.
L-120121192/2000-IR(B-II). The dispute under reference
relates to :
‘‘Whether the action of the Branch Manager, Punjab
National Bank, Seoni in stopping the services of
Shri Narendra Chourasia, Casual Labour w.e.f.
8-3-91 and not regularizing him on completion of 240
days as peon is justified? If not, what relief the
workman is entitled to?’’
2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to
the parties. Statement of claim is filed by workman at page
4/1 to 4/4. The case of Ist party workman is that he was
appointed on post of Daftary-cum-Peon from July, 1989 at
Seoni with approval of the Regional Manager. He was
working as Daftary cum peon since his appointment. He
was entrusted work to arrange vouchers and prepare
bundles etc. He was also entrusted to distribute bills and
all other work of peon such as to care the registers and
ledgers of the Bank. That IInd party is Industry. His services
are terminated from 8-3-91 without assigning any reasons.
Mandatory provisions of I.D. Act were not followed before
terminating his services. Principles of natural justice was
not followed. He was not served with notice or chargesheet.
His salary in lieu of notice was not paid to him. He was not
given opportunity for his defence.
3. Workman submitted that he had completed 240
days continuous service as daftary-cum-peon as provided
under Section 25(B) of I.D.Act. They have acquired status
of permanent employee. His services are terminated without
notice. He is not gainfully employed. On above contentions,
he prays for his reinstatement with back wages .
IInd party submitted Written Statement at Page 6/1
to 6/9. IInd party submits that the reference is not tenable.
The reference is misconceived. That the workman was
never engaged as peon on daily wages. He was
intermittently engaged to perform certain casual work for
cleaning or removing the stationery bodes for which he
was paid necessary paid at the agreed rates.· That the
service conditions of workmen staff in the Banking
Industry are governed by the provisions of the Sastri
Award, Desai Award and various bipartite settlements. As
per Para 16.9 of the Desai Award the service conditions of
the workman employed in the Banks are not applicable to
the provisions who are casual employees or who are
employed to do the job work. The reference is not tenable.
That the workman had intermittently worked for 106 days
from July, 89 to Feb, 1991. He had not completed 240 days
continuous service. That the workman was engaged as
daily wage for certain work. His services came to end at
the end of the day. His dis-continuance of servicedoesnot
amount to retrenchment under Section 2(oo )(bb) of the
LD.Act but it is covered under Section 2( oo )(bb) of I.D.Act.
On such grounds, IInd party prays for rejection of claim of
workman.
5. Considering pleadings on record, the points
which arise for my consideration and determination are as
4650
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
under. My findings are recorded against each of them for
the reasons as below :—
(i) Whether the action of the
In Negative
Branch Manager, Punjab
National Bank, Seoni in
stopping the services of
Shri Narendra Chourasia,
Casual Labour w.e.f. 8-3-91
and not regularizing him on
completion of 240 days as
peon is legal?
(i i) If so, to what relief the
Relief prayed by
workman is entitled to ?’’
workman are
rejected.
REASONS
6. That workman is challenging his termination
contending that he was continuously working from 1989
to 1991. His services were illegally terminated without
notice in violation of Section 25-F of I.D.Act. Workman
has not adduced any evidence. He is proceeded exparte
on 9-3-2011. Management has filed affidavit of witness
Shri D. M. Dwivedi. Management witness has stated that
workman was engaged as casual labour from July ,1989 to
February, 1991—total 106 days. His evidence remained
unchallenged. I donot find reason to disbelieve his
evidence. The evidence on record doesnot establish that
the services of workman are illegally terminated in violation
of Section 25-F of I.D.Act. For above reasons, I record my
finding in Point No.1 in Negative.
7. In the result, award is passed as under :—
(i)
The action of the Branch Manager, Punjab
National Bank, Seoni in stopping the services of
Shri Narendra Chourasia, Casual Labour w.e.f.
8-3-91 and not regularizing him on completion of
240 days as peon is legal.
(ii)
Relief prayed by workman are-rejected.
R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 9 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1647-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947
(1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj
Hkkjrh; thou chek fuxe ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj
muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa
dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;&I, fnYyh ds
iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 184@2011) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh;
ljdkj dks 4&7&2013 dks izkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y& 17012@70@96&vkbZ vkj(ch&II)º
lqefr ldykuh] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 9th July, 2013
S.O. 1647.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (I.D. No. 184/
2011) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, I, New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure,
in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation
to the management of Life Insurance Corporation of India
and their workmen, which was received by the Central
Government on 4-7-2013.
[No. L-17012/70/96-IR(B-II)]
SUMATI SAKLANI, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE DR. R. K. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER,
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL
NO.I, KARKARDOOMA COURTS COMPLEX, DELHI
I.D.No.184/2011
Shri S.M. Sawhney,
Through the General Secretary
Delhi Division Insurance Workers Organization
5230 Ajmeri Gate,
Delhi -110 006
. . . Workman
Versus
The Senior Divisional Manager,
Life Insurance Corporation of India,
Delhi Division No.1,
25, Kasturba Gandhi Marg,
New Delhi- 110 001
. . . Management
AWARD
During the period 1980—89, Life Insurance
Corporation of India (in short the Corporation) was
defrauded to the tune of Rs.834759.00 by its employees, by
way issuance of cheques on the strength of bogus
payment vouchers favouring non-existent persons, viz.
Gauri Shankar and Daya Ram. Matter was referred by the
Corporation to CBI for investigation. CBI conducted a
preliminary enquiry and registered RC No.1(s)/90/DLI on
31-01-1990. During the course of investigation, name of
Shri Surender Mohan Sawhney, the claimant, also figured
as an accused, besides others. In its report dated 30-04-
1992, CBI took steps for prosecution of Shri D.S. Pulsule,
retired Assistant of the Corporation for offences punishable
under Section 420, 468, 471, of the Penal Code and Section
13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act,
1988. Regular Departmental action for minor penalty was
recommended against S/Shri S.M. Jain, Surender Kumar,
Jagdish Mitter Sawhney, Joginder Lal Sharma and Smt.
Nalini M. Ratnam, while regular departmental action for
major penalty was recommended against the claimant,
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4651
besides 9 other employees. Show cause notice was served
on the claimant by the Corporation on 18-02-1994. Without
conducting an enquiry, punishment of Censure was
awarded to the claimant by the Disciplinary Authority. His
appeal also came to be dismissed.
2. Claimant had received two stagnation increments.
His third stagnation increment was deferred for one year
by the Corporation, since punishment of Censure was
awarded to him. Later on, his stagnation increment was
released with effect from 01-08-1995. Claimant
superannuated from service on 31-07-1996. After his
superannuation, he allegedly approached the Delhi
Division Insurance Workers' Organization (in short the
union) for redressal of his grievances. It was claimed that
the union raised a dispute before the Conciliation Officer.
Since the Corporation contested the claim, conciliation
proceedings ended into a failure. On consideration of failure
report, submitted by the Conciliation Officer, appropriate
Government referred the dispute to this Tribunal for
adjudication, vide order No.L-17012/70/96-IR(B-II),
New Delhi dated 06- 01-1998, with following terms :
“Whether action of the management of LIC of India
in imposing penalty of Censure and deferring the
stagnation increment for one year with effect from
01-08-1984 on Shri S.M. Sawhney, Higher Grade
Assistant, Serial No.102142, is legal and justified? If
not, to what relief is the workman entitled to and
from which date?”
3. Claim statement was filed on behalf of the claimant
pleading therein that he was working as Higher Grade
Assistant at Delhi Divisional Office of the Corporation prior
to his superannuation on 31-07-1996. Preparation,
maintenance and custody of transaction/cash book is the
sole responsibility of accounts department of the
Corporation. All payment vouchers are allotted serial
numbers in continuous order for each financial year. As
per normal practice, first copy of payment voucher is to be
retained in accounts department for future reference.
Authorized signatory is only required to verify the entry
made in the transaction/cash book with accompanied
cheque and payment voucher and then makes necessary
endorsements in the cash book. A number of financial
irregularities came to light during the course of special
audit of accounts department of the Corporation. Huge
financial loss was caused to the Corporation. Matter was
referred for investigation to CBI. Unfortunately, the
Corporation sought to enact a massive cover up operation
and found a few convenient scape-goats to whom relatively
minor or insignificant punishments were awarded. Show
cause notice dated 28-02-1994 was served on the claimant
after more than five years of issuance of cheques No.159033
and 157702 dated 16-03-1989 and 28-03-1989 respectively.
Claimant sought copies of transaction/cash book, cheques
and relevant payment vouchers vide letters dated
04-03-1994, 07-07-1994, 22-07-1994, 30-12-1994 and
11-02-1995. In complete violation of principles of natural
justice, these documents were not supplied to him. Regional
Manager wrote that payment vouchers were not necessary
for the purpose. Those documents were never supplied to
him. On the other hand, punishment of Censure was
awarded to him vide letter dated 07-12-1995. Claimant
preferred an appeal, which was rejected on 15-05-1996,
without passing speaking orders on the issues raised by
him.
4. Claimant had already received two stagnation
increments when aforesaid show cause notice was served
upon him. His third stagnation increment was due in 1990,
which in fact was not granted to him in spite of wage
agreement in the year 1995. He was informed vide letters
dated 09-04-1996 and 11-05-1996 that consideration of his
stagnation increment has been postponed by one year
since punishment of Censure was awarded to him. It has
been claimed that awarding of punishment of Censure was
against principles of natural justice and fair play.
Shri Sawhney is entitled for getting punishment of Censure
quashed and grant of third stagnation increment from due
date.
5. Claim was demurred by the Corporation pleading
that on his superannuation, Shri Sawhney ceased to be a
workman on 31-07-1996. Claim was raised on 31-03-1998,
which is an individual dispute. Corporation claims that the
dispute is liable to be rejected on this count alone. However,
his stagnation increment was deferred for a period of one
year upto 01-08-1995. Stagnation increment was released
in his favour with effect from 01-08-1995 and as such, claim
is liable to be dismissed.
6. Corporation projects that the claimant was
working as Higher Grade Assistant at Delhi Divisional Office
till the date of his retirement. His duties were to pass/sign
cheques on behalf of the Corporation, after verifying the
transaction from payment voucher, besides verification of
facts that it was properly and correctly recorded in the
transaction/cash book. Verification of record of transaction
before passing the cheque is a sort of internal check to
avoid frauds. Claimant signed and passed two cheques,
referred in his claim statement, without verifying that
necessary entries in cash book was recorded in that regard
from relevant payment voucher. When the claimant signed
and passed, above referred two cheques, various columns
in the cash book were lying incomplete. On account of
these lapses, payment of Rs.70,930.00 was made to fictitious
non-existent persons in fraudulent manner. Claimant
committed breach of Regulation No.21 and 24 of LIC Staff
Regulations (in short the Regulations). Show cause notice
was served on the claimant, who in his reply dated
11-02-1995 admits signing of those two cheques. He had
not commented upon factum of correct recording of entries
in cash book, in his reply. This has led to fraudulent
4652
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
payment of the amount, referred above. Though the
claimant deserves major penalty, yet only minor penalty
under the Regulations was levied, since he was at the fag
end of his service. Vouchers, demanded by the claimant,
were not required for proving his negligence. Since penalty
of Censure was awarded to him under Regulation 39, his
stagnation increment was deferred for a period of one year,
which was subsequently released. It has been projected
that there is no case in favour of the claimant. His claim
statement may be dismissed.
7. In rejoinder, facts pleaded in the claim statement,
have been reiterated.
8. Vide order No. Z-22019/6/2007-IR(C-II), New Delhi
dated 11-02-2008, case was transferred to Central
Government Industrial Tribunal No.II, New Delhi, for
adjudication by the appropriate Government. It was
retransferred to this Tribunal for adjudication vide order
No. Z-22019/6/2007-IR(C-II), New Delhi dated 30-03-2011
by the appropriate Government.
9. Claimant has examined himself in support of his
claim. Shri N.S. Verma, Manager (Admn.) was examined by
the Corporation. No other witness was examined by either
of the parties.
10.Arguments were heard at the bar. Claimant had
advanced arguments in person. Shri S.M. Bhatnagar,
authorised representative, presented facts on behalf of the
Corporation. Written submissions have been filed on
behalf of the parties. I have given my careful considerations
to the arguments advanced at the bar and cautiously
perused the record. My findings on issues involved in the
controversy are as follows :
11.First and foremost contention advanced by
Shri Bhatnagar is that the claimant superannuated on
31-07-1996. Thereafter, issue raised by him in the claim
statement nowhere reflects common interest of employees
of the Corporation. No resolution was passed by the union,
taking up his cause for redressal. Therefore, only an
individual dispute has been raised and this Tribunal has
no jurisdiction to adjudicate it. Contra to it, claimant agitates
that his dispute was espoused by the union vide letter
dated 06-04-1998. He argued that since the union took up
his cause, it does not lie in the mouth of the Corporation to
agitate that an individual dispute has been referred for
adjudication.
12.Since an incidental question has been raised by
the Corporation that the dispute referred is an individual
dispute, it becomes expedient to ascertain as to whether
the dispute is an industrial dispute. For an answer to this
proposition, definition of the term 'industrial dispute' is to
be construed. Section 2(k) of the Industrial Disputes Act,
1947 (in short the Act), defines the term 'industrial dispute',
which definition is extracted thus:
‘‘(k) ‘‘Industrial dispute’’ means any dispute or
difference between employers and employers, or
between employers and workmen, or between
workmen and workmen, which is connected with
the employment or non-employment or the terms
of employment or with the conditions of labour,
of any person.’’
13.The definition of ‘‘industrial dispute’’ referred
above, can be divided into four parts, viz. (i) factum of
dispute, (2) parties to the dispute, viz.(a) employers and
employers, (b) employer and workmen, or (c) workmen and
workmen, (3) subject matter of the dispute, which should
be connected with—(i) employment or non employment,
or (ii) terms of employment, or (iii) condition of labour of
any person, and (4) it should relate to an ‘‘industry’’.
14.The definition of ‘‘industrial dispute’’ is worded
in very wide terms and unless they are narrowed by the
meaning given to word ‘‘workman’’ it would seem to include
all ‘‘employers’’, all ‘‘employments’’ and all ‘‘workmen’’,
whatever the nature or scope of the employment may be.
Therefore, except in the case where there can be a dispute
between the employers and employers and workmen and
workmen, one of the parties to an industrial dispute must
be an employee or a class of employees. The first point,
therefore, to be noted, perhaps self evident, is that the
phrase ‘‘employer and workmen’’, the plural may include
singular on either side or any permutation of singular or
plural, the masculine including the feminine. In order,
therefore, to determine as to whether a controversy or
difference or a dispute is an ‘‘an industrial dispute’’ or not,
it must first be determined whether the workman concerned
or workmen sponsoring his cause satisfy the conditions of
clause (s) of section 2 of the Act. Here in the case, the
Corporation does not dispute that the claimant is workman
within the meaning of clause(s) of section 2 of the Act.
15.The Apex Court put gloss on the definition of
‘‘industrial dispute’’ in Dimakuchi Tea Estate [1958 (1) LLJ
500] and ruled that the expression "any person" in clause
(k) of section 2 of the Act must be read subject to such
limitation and qualification as arise from the context, the
two crucial limitations are (1) the dispute must be a real
dispute between the parties to the dispute (as indicated in
the first two parts of the definition clause) so as to be
capable of settlement or adjudication by one party to the
dispute giving necessary relief to other, and (2) the person
regarding whom the dispute is raised must be one for
whose employment, non employment, terms of employment
or conditions of labour, as case may be, the parties dispute
for a direct or substantial interest. Where workman raised a
dispute as against their employment, the person regarding
whose employment, non employer, terms of employment
or conditions of labour, the dispute is raised need not be
strictly speaking ‘‘workman’’ within the meaning of the
Act, but must be one in whose employment, non
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4653
employment, terms of employment, or conditions of labour
the workmen as a class have a direct or substantial interest.
The observations made by the Apex Court are to be
extracted thus:
‘‘We also agree with the expression ‘‘any person’’ is
not co-extensive with any workman, particular or
otherwise, equal with other, that the crucial test is
one of community of interest and the person
regarding whom the dispute is raised must be one in
whose employment, non employment, terms of
employment, conditions of labour (as the case may
be) the parties to the dispute have a direct or
substantial interest. Whether such direct or
substantial interest has been established in a
particular case will depend on its facts and
circumstances.’’
16. In Kyas Construction Company (Pvt ) Ltd. [1958
(2) LLJ 660], the Apex Court ruled that an industrial dispute
need not be a dispute between the employer and his
workman and that the definition of the expression
‘‘Industrial Dispute’’ is wide enough to cater a dispute
raised by the employer’s workman with regard to non
employment of others, who may not be employed as
workman at the relevant time. The Apex Court in Bombay
Union of Journalist [1961 (II) LLJ 436] has observed that in
each case in ascertaining whether an individual dispute
has acquired the character of an industrial dispute, the test
is whether at the date of reference, the dispute was taken
up as submitted by the union of the workmen of the
employer against whom, the dispute is raised by an
individual workman or by an appreciable number of
workmen. In order, therefore, to convert an individual
dispute into an industrial dispute, it has to be established
that it has been taken up by the union of employees of the
establishment or by an appreciable number of the
employees of the establishment. As far as union of the
workmen of establishment itself is concerned, the problem
of espousal by them generally presents little difficulty, since
such workmen who are members of such unions generally
have a continuity of interest with an individual employee
who is one of their fellow workman. But difficulty arise
when the cause of a workman, in a particular establishment
is sponsored by a union which is not of the workmen of
that establishment but is one of which membership is open
to workmen of their establishment as well as in that industry.
In such a case a union which has only microscopic number
of the workmen as its member, cannot sponsor any dispute
arising between the workmen and the management. A
representative character of the union has to be gathered
from the strength of the actual number of co-workers
sponsoring the dispute. The mere fact that a substantial
number of workmen of the establishment in which the
concerned workman was employee were also members of
the union would not constitute sponsorship. It must be
shown that they were connected together and arrived at
an understanding by a resolution or by other means and
collectively submitted the dispute.
17.The expression ‘‘industrial disputes’’ has been
construed by the Apex Court to include individual disputes,
because of the scheme of the Act. In Raghu Nath Gopal
Patvardhan [1957(1) LLJ 27] the Apex Court ruled as to
what dispute can be called as an industrial dispute. It was
laid thereon that (1) a dispute between the employer and a
single workman cannot be an industrial dispute, (2) it cannot
per-se be an industrial dispute but may become if it is taken
up by a trade union or a number of workmen. In Dharampal
Prem Chand [1965 (1) LLJ 668] it was commanded by the
Apex Court that a dispute raised by a single workman cannot
become an industrial dispute unless it is supported either
by his union or in the absence of a union by substantial
number of workmen. Same law was laid in the case of
Indian Express Newspaper (Pvt.) Limited [1970 (1) LLJ 132].
However in Western India Match Company [1970 (II) LLJ
256], the Apex Court referred the precedent in Dimakuchi
Tea Estate's case [1958 (1) LLJ 500)]and ruled that a dispute
relating to ‘‘any person becomes a dispute where the person
in respect of whom it is raised is one in whose employment,
non-employment, terms of employment or conditions of
labour, the parties, dispute for a direct or substantial
interest’’.
18.What a substantial or considerable number of
workmen would be in a given case, depend on particular
facts of the case. The fact that an ‘‘industrial dispute’’, is
supported by other workmen will have to be established
either in the form of a resolution of the union of which
workman may be member or of the workmen themselves
who support the dispute or in any other manner. From the
mere fact that a general union, at whose instance an
‘‘industrial dispute’’ concerning an individual workman is
referred for adjudication, has on its roll a few of the workmen
of the establishment as its members, it cannot be inferred
that the individual dispute has been converted into
an‘‘industrial dispute’’. The Tribunal has therefore, to
consider the question as to how many of the fellow workman
actually espoused the cause of the concerned workman by
participating in the particular resolution of the Union. In
the absence of such a determination by the Tribunal, it
cannot be said that the individual dispute acquired the
character of an industrial dispute and the Tribunal will not
acquire jurisdiction to adjudicate upon the dispute.
Nevertheless, in order to make a dispute an industrial
dispute, it is not necessary that there should always be a
resolution of substantial or appreciable number of workmen.
What is necessary is that there should be some express or
collective will of a substantial or an appreciable member of
the workmen treating the cause of the individual workman
as their own cause. Law to this effect was laid in
P.Somasundrameran [1970 (1) LLJ 558].
4654
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
19.It is not necessary that the sponsoring union is a
registered trade union or a recognized trade union. Once it
is shown that a body of substantial number of workmen
either acting through a union or otherwise had sponsored
the workman's cause, it is sufficient to convert it into an
industrial dispute. In Pardeep Lamp Works [1970 (1) LLJ
507] complaints relating to dispute of ten workmen were
filed before the Conciliation Officer by the individual
workmen themselves. But their case was subsequently
taken up by a new union formed by a large number of co-
workmen, if not a majority of them. Since this union was
not registered or recognized, the workmen elected five
representatives to prosecute the cases of ten dismissed
workmen. Thus cases of the dismissed workmen were
espoused by the new union, yet unregistered and
unrecognized. The Apex Court held that the fact that these
disputes were not taken up by a registered or recognized
union does not mean that they were not ‘‘industrial
dispute’’.
20.It is not expedient that same union should remain
incharge of that dispute till its adjudication. The dispute
may be espoused by the workmen of an establishment,
through a particular union for making such a dispute an
‘‘industrial dispute’’, while the workman may be
represented before the Tribunal for the purpose of Section
36 of the Act by a member of executive or office bearer of
altogether another union. The crux of the matter is that the
dispute should be a dispute between the employer and his
workmen. It is not necessary that the dispute must be
espoused or conducted only by a registered trade union.
Even if a trade union ceases to be registered trade union
during the continuance of the adjudication proceedings
that would not affect the maintainability of the order of
reference. Law to this effect was laid by the High Court of
Orissa in Gammon India Limited [1974 (II) LLJ 34]. For
ascertaining as to whether an individual dispute has
acquired character of an individual dispute, the test is
whether on the date of the reference the dispute was taken
up as supported by the union of the workmen of the
employer against whom the dispute is raised by the
individual workman or by an appreciable number of the
workman. In other words, the validity of the reference of an
industrial dispute must be judged on the facts as they
stood on the date of the reference and not necessarily on
the date when the cause occurs. Reference can be made to
a precedent in Western India Match Co.Ltd. [1970 (II) LLJ
256].
21.With above prelude in mind, now it would be
ascertained as to whether the dispute was espoused by
the union. Claimant testified during the course of his cross-
examination that his dispute was espoused by the union
vide letter dated 04-06-1998. On record, letter dated
06-041998 is there, which is an authority letter on the
strength of which claimant was authorized, besides others,
to represent the union in the present matter. For the sake
of convenience, contents of the said letter are reproduced
thus:
‘‘With reference to the above case, we, hereby,
authorize Shri S.M. Sawhney, Executive Member,
Northern Zone Insurance Workers Organization, Shri
Jagdish Prasad, General Secretary, DDIWO and Shri
O.P. Dhingra, General Secretary, Northern Zone
Insurance Workers Organization, to represent the
union in the above referred dispute’’.
22.As the above letter projects, it was written by
Shri Jagdish Prasad in the capacity of General Secretary of
the union. It is evident that the said authority letter was
issued by the General Secretary, authorizing the claimant,
Shri Jagdish Prasad, (General Secretary himself) and Shri
O.P. Dhingra to represent the union in the matter before
this Tribunal. It appears that in the evidence the claimant
inadvertently spelt the date of the letter as 04-06-1998
instead of 06-04-1998. It is crystal clear that this letter
nowhere projects that the union took up the cause of the
claimant for redressal of his grievance. It is not an espousal
of the case of the claimant before the authorities under the
Act.
23.How a case of an individual employee can be
espoused by the union or a considerable number of
workmen in the establishment of the employer has been
specifically provided by the Act as well as Industrial
Disputes (Central) Rules , 1957(in short the Rules). Sub-
section (2) of Section 10 of the Act projects that when
industrial dispute is applied in the prescribed manner to
the appropriate Government, if satisfied that the person
applying represents majority of each party, it shall make
reference accordingly. Rule 3 of the rules projects as to in
what form the application under sub-section (2) of Section 10
of the Act shall be made. Rule 4 provides as to who shall
sign the said application and its accompanying statements.
For sake of convenience provisions of the aforesaid rules
are reproduced thus :
‘‘3. Application—
An application under sub-section (2) of Section 10
for the reference of an industrial dispute to a Board,
Court, Labour Court, Tribunal or National Tribunal
shall be made in Form A and shall be delivered
personally or forwarded by registered post (1) to the
Secretary to the Government of India in the Ministry
of Labour and Employment (in triplicate), the Chief
Labour Commissioner (Central), New Delhi, and the
Regional Labour Commissioner (Central), and the
Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central)
concerned. The application shall be accompanied
by a statement setting forth—
(a) the parties to the dispute;
(b) the specific matters in dispute;
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4655
(c) the total number of workmen employed in the
undertaking affected;
(d) an estimate of the number of workmen affected
or likely to be affected by the dispute; and
(e) the efforts made by the parties themselves to
adjust the dispute.
4. Attestation of application
The application and the statement accompanying, it
shall be signed :
(a) in the case of an employer by the employer
himself, or when the employer is an
incorporated company or other body
corporate, by the agent, manager or other
principal officer of the Corporation;
(b) in the case of workmen, either by the President
and Secretary of a trade union of the workmen,
or by five representatives of the workmen duly
authorised in this behalf at a meeting of the
workmen held for the purpose;
(c) in the case of an individual workman, by the
workman himself or by any officer of the trade
union of which he is a member or by another
workman in the same establishment duly
authorised by him in this behalf :
Provided that such workman is not a member of a
different trade union.’’
24.Bare reading of the aforesaid rules makes it
apparent that the application in case of workmen shall be
signed either by the President and Secretary of the trade
union or by five representatives of the workmen duly
authorised in that behalf at a meeting of the workmen held
for the purpose. In case of dispute relating to dismissal,
discharge, retrenchment or otherwise termination of the
workman by his employer, the application may be signed
by the individual workmen himself or any an officer of the
trade union or by another workman in the same
establishment duly authorised by him in this behalf. As
facts project, it is not a case where a dispute relating to
dismissal, discharge, retrenchment or otherwise termination
of the service of the claimant has been raised. Therefore,
application in raising the dispute was to be signed either
by the President and Secretary of the union or by five
representatives of the workmen duly authorised in that
behalf at a meeting of the workmen held for the purpose.
Claimant deposed that his dispute was espoused by the
union vide letter dated 04-06-1998 (wrongly mentioned as
06-04-1998 in the evidence). When letter dated 6-04-1998
is perused, it is evident that this document nowhere speaks
about resolution made by the union espousing cause of
the claimant before the authorities, authorizing its President
and Secretary or five representatives in that behalf to sign
the application for raising the dispute. Evidently, letter
dated 06-04-1998 does not meet the requirements of law.
25.Even otherwise, letter dated 6-04-1998 is of no
consequence. The union can espouse a case on the date
when the industrial dispute was raised before the authorities
under the Act and not at a later date. Validity of an industrial
dispute is to be judged on facts as they stood on the date
of reference. Here in the case, reference of the dispute was
made by the appropriate Government on 6-01-1998.
Consequently, espousal of the dispute can be either prior
to 6-01-1998 or on 6-01-1998 and not thereafter. As deposed
by the claimant, his dispute was espoused by the union on
06-04-1998. On that date, espousal of the dispute by the
union would not accord it status of an industrial dispute.
No evidence is there on the record to the effect that the
union or considerable number of the workmen in the
establishment of the Corporation expressed their collective
will to take up the cause of the claimant as their own. No
evidence as to passing of a resolution or expression of
collective will of the workmen has been brought over the
record. Hence, claimant could not bring any evidence to
show that the dispute acquired character of an industrial
dispute. Therefore, it is crystal clear that the dispute
referred for adjudication by the appropriate Government
nowhere answers the parameters of an industrial dispute.
26.Unfortunately, full dress trial was conducted.
Evidence of the claimant on merits of the case was taken.
The Corporation examined Shri Verma to rebut evidence of
the claimant. When matter was considered, it was found to
be a case of no enquiry. However, the Corporation had
adduced evidence relating to misconduct committed by
the claimant. But when finding has been recorded to this
effect that it was an individual dispute, it would not be in
the fitness of things to proceed with further adjudication.
Consequently, I refrain my hands from adjudication of the
matter on merits.
27.As pointed out above, an individual dispute has
been referred for adjudication to this Tribunal. The
appropriate Government was incompetent to refer an
individual dispute for adjudication under Section 10(1)(d)
of the Act. This Tribunal cannot invoke its jurisdiction to
adjudicate the dispute, since it has not acquired character
of an industrial dispute. Resultantly, the Tribunal refrain
its hands from adjudicating the matter, with an observation
that the appropriate Government was not competent to
refer the dispute and the Tribunal has not acquired any
jurisdiction to adjudicate it. An award is, accordingly,
passed. It be sent to the appropriate Government for
adjudication.
Dr. R. K. YADAV, Presiding Officer
Dated : 19-06-2013
4656
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ubZ fnYyh] 10 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1648-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj tujy eSustj]
oSdy iQSDVªh ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa
ds chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj
vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k lh-th-vkbZ-
Vh-@,y-lh-@vkj-@223@91) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj
dks 28&6&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y&14011@01@1987&Mh&II (ch)º
lkse ukFk] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the10th July, 2013
S.O. 1648.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGIT/
LC/R/223/91) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the
Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers
in relation to the management of The General Manager,
Vehicle Factory and their workman which was received
by the Central Government on 28-6-2013.
[ F. No. L-14011/01/1987-D-II(B)]
SOM NATH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/223/91
SHRI R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer.
The President,
Vehicle Factory Mazdoor Union, H.No.2798,
Vehicle Factory Estate,
Jabalpur
. . . Workman/Union
Versus
The General Manager,
Vehicle Factory,
Jabalpur
. . . Management
AWARD
Passed on this 17th day of April 2013
1. As per letter dated 27-11-91 by the Government of
India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is
received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under
Section 10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.L-14011/
1/87-D.II(B). The dispute under reference relates to :
“ Whether the demand of Vehicle Factory Mazdoor
Union, Jabalpur in asking seniority of Shri
K.D.Pathak and others ( total 23 employees- list
enclosed) by counting their services rendered as
Checker by counting their services rendered as
checker equivalent to LDC for promotion of UDC is
justified? If yes, what relief these workmen are
entitled to?”
2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to
the parties. 1st party workman submits their Statement of
claim. It is case of the 1st party workman that those 23
employees shows in the annexure were working as
checkers since 1972 in IInd party. That because of
Administrative reasons, the post of checkers were
abolished around 1-4-80. That from 1-1-1973, the
Commission recommended scale of Rs. 225-308 for
checkers, 264-400 for LDCs. The said pay scale was given
to checker from 1-1-1973. In IVth Pay Commission, pay
scales were changed. Persons who have joined after the
applicant as LDCs have been given promotions as UDCs
without considering seniority/length of service. The
applicant’s claim that the 1st party workman were senior
to the UDC promoted in the year 1977 to 1980, they be
given seniority of the period they were working as
checkers. It is further contended that the duties performed
by checkers and LDCs are identical. The 1st party workman
has also explained delay in filing reference as they were
required to file miscellaneous petition No. 1471/88 even
after failure report no action was taken for 2 years. After
direction in Writ Petition, the Government refused to make
reference. The reference was made only after issuing
directions in Miscellaneous Petition No. 270/90. 1st party
prays for considering seniority of those 23 employees
working as checker during the period 1972 onwards.
3. IInd party filed Written Statement at Page 5/1 to
5/8. The contentions of Hnd party are that initially 1st
party were working as checkers from 1972 onwards. The
seniority was granted in grade of LDC. That in pursuance
of instructions contained in letter dated 28-5-62, giving
seniority was discontinued. The seniority was directed to
be given as per letter dated 2-8-72. It is submitted that the
checkers getting salary of minimum pay scale of LDC was
given seniority from such date. It is submitted that the
applicants/workmen are not entitled to seniority claimed
by them for promotion to the post of LDC from 1972 i.e.
their initial appointment as checkers. Rest of the contention
of the 1st party workmen are denied.
4. It is submitted that Mr. M.Uttaman, LDC was
appointed from checker to LDC w.e.f. 8-8-72. That as per
letter dated 8-8-72, his seniority in the grade of LDC was
considered from the date of crossing minimum basic pay
of LDC. That 12 employees were considered for scrutiny
and 3 of them were granted seniority as LDC. It is further
submitted that the checkers appointed after 22-5-72 to LDC
during 1979, 1980 are not. entitled to seniority and upgrade
of LDC. IInd party prayed for rejection of claim of 1st
party workmen.
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4657
5. Considering pleadings on record, the points which
arise for my consideration and determination are as under.
My findings are recorded against each of them for the
reasons as below :—
(i)
Whether the demand of Vehicle
In Negative
Factory Mazdoor Union, Jabalpur.
In asking seniority of Shri K. D.
Pathak and others ( total 23
employees—list enclosed) by
counting their services rendered
as Checker by counting their
services rendered as checker
equivalent to LDC for promotion
of UDC is justified?
(ii)
If so, to what relief the workman is
Demand of
entitled to?
1st party
are rejected.
REASONS
6. Though the 1st party workmen has submitted
statement of claim, they failed to adduce evidence in
support of their demands. Even some of the employee
died, their LRs are not brought on record. As seen from
the ordersheet, Union did not participate to substantiate
its demand under reference. Management also didnot
adduce any evidence. Since both parties are not
participating in the hearing of the matter, it appears that
the demands under reference are not pursued by the Union.
For want of evidence, I record my finding on Point No.1 in
Negative.
7. In the result, award is passed as under :—
(1) The demand of Vehicle Factory Mazdoor Union,
Jabalpur in asking seniority of Shri K.D.Pathak and others
( total 23 employees- list enclosed) by counting their
services rendered as Checker by counting their services
rendered as checker equivalent to LDC for promotion of
UDC is not just and proper.
(2) Demand ofIst party are rejected.”
R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 10 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1649-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj tujy eSustj]
xu dSfjt iQSDVªh ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds
deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh;
ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k lh-
th-vkbZ-Vh-@,y-lh-@vkj-@173@91) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh;
ljdkj dks 28&6&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y&14012@24@1991&vkbZ vkj (Mh;w)º
lkse ukFk] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the10th July, 2013
S.O. 1649.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGIT/
LC/R/173/91) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal-cum Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the
Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the General
Manager, Gun Carriage Factory and their workman which
was received by the Central Government on 28-6-2013.
[ No. L-14012/24/1991-IR (DU)]
SOM NATH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/173/91
Shri R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer.
Shri Anil Kumar Jha,
Ex- T.No.1160/ I.E-Jr.Examiner,
C/o Sushma Pandey,
372/2, Hawabagh Rly. Colony,
Gorakhpur, Jabalpur
. . . Workman
Versus
General Manager,
Gun Carriage factory,
Jabalpur
. . . Management
AWARD
Passed on this 4th day of March 2013
1. As per letter dated 26-9-91 by the Government of
India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is
received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under
Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.
L-14012/24/91-IR(DU) dated 26-9-91. The dispute under
reference relates to :—
“Whether the action of the management of Gun’
Carriage Factory, Jabalpur (MP) is justified in
terminating the services of Shri Anil Kumar Jha, Ex-
T. NO. 1160/I.E-Jr. Examiner, w:e,f. 5-4-85 ? If not, to
what relief he is entitled?”
2. After receipt of reference, notices were issued to
the parties. 1st party/workman submitted his statement of
claim at Page 3/1 to 3/5 of the record. As per statement of
claim, the case of 1st party/workman is that he was working
as Junior Examiner in IInd party/GCF, Jabalpur. His service
record was excellent. He was never punished. Chargesheet
was issued on 25-6-84 on the allegation that on 13-6-84 at
about 9 PM, he was apprehended by Sepoy Narain Singh
4658
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
while stiching the mouth of a bag filled with non-ferrous
turnings/barings scrap in the brass scrap in the Vijayanta
Vibhag Area weighing about 111.50 Kg. for taking out of
the factory. That he had denied the charges. Departmental
Enquiry was ordered against him. On the basis of findings
of DE, as per order dated 5-4-85 issued by the General
Manager, Gun Carriage Factory, Jabalpur. He had preferred
appeal challengIng said order. His appeal was rejected.
“3. 1st party/workman challenges order of his
removal on the ground that alongwith chargesheet, copies
of witnesses were not supplied to him. Consequently he
could not submit proper reply to the chargesheet. That
enquiry was not properly conducted. The Enquiry Officer
acted as prosecutor to see that charges are proved. That
evidence of the witnesses had admitted certain facts.
Those admission were not considered by the Enquiry
Officer. That Shri R.L.Prasad witness No.1 was not
examined in Enquiry, his statement was not recorded before
Enquiry Officer. Only his previous statement was admitted.
Findings of Enquiry Officer are perverse and contrary to
the evidence on record. The Enquiry officer based his
findings on presumption as such illegal. However
Appellate Authority acted mechanically while rejecting
his appeal. The order of Appellate Authority is contrary to
the provisions of CCS(CCA)Rules. That there was no
evidence to prove the charges. The Enquiry Officer cross-
examined witnesses of the Ilnd party without justification.
The Enquiry Officer imported his personal knowledge while
recording his findings. The findings of Enquiry Officer
are illegal. 1st party therefore prays for his reinstatement
with back wages.
4. IInd party filed Written Statement at Page 6/1 to
6/7. The IInd party denied all the contention of the 1st
party. It is not necessary to submit statement of witnesses
alongwith charge sheet. The statements of witnesses were
supplied during course of enquiry. IInd party has narrated
incident that on 13-6-84, 1st party/workman was found
near the brass scrap in the Vijayanta Vibhag area between
7 to 9 PM. He was found with scrap filled in the bag
attempting to commit theft. He was produced before
Security. 1st party/workman was suspended. Charge sheet
was issued to him for gross misconduct of attempt to
commit theft of Govt. property. That the allegation of 1st
party about enquiry conducted against him are not fair
and proper and denied by the IInd party. That to find out
truth, Enquiry Officer has cross-examined witnesses.
During enquiry, it was found that 1st party was missing
from his place of work. He was found at Watch Tower No.
14 standing near brass scrap heap. The misconduct of 1st
party is proved in enquiry from evidence of the witnesses.
The findings of the Enquiry Officer are supported by
evidence and as such not perverse. The IInd party further
contended that the rules under Article 309 under
constitution are governing the employees of IInd party.
Therefore the reference under I.D . Act is not tenable. IInd
party has also referred to ratio held in different cases on
the point of imposing penalty and powers of the Industrial
Court. It is submitted that removal of 1st party is legal.
The claim of 1st party for reinstatement cannot be allowed.
5. 1st party/workman submitted rejoinder at Page
8/1 to 8/3 retreating the ground in his statement of claim. It
is submitted that it is mandatory to supply copy of
statement along with charge sheet. That Enquiry Officer
cross-examined management’s witnesses. The reference
is tenable as provisions of I.D. Act relates to adjudication
of dispute where as Rules under Article 309 of constitution
deals with the service conditions of the employees.
6. Considering pleadings between the parties,
preliminary issue about whether the enquiry held against
1st party/workman is just and legal was decided after
hearing argument by my predecessor. Vide order. dated
24-1-96, the Enquiry held against 1st party/workman was
found just and proper. In view of enquiry against 1st party
is legal, the other issues needs to be decided & my findings
are recorded against each of them for the reasons as
below :—
(i)
whether the findings of
In Affirmative
the Enquiry Officer are
supported by satisfactory
evidence?
(ii)
whether the punishment
In Affirmative
of removal of 1st party is
legal ?
(iii)
To what relief, the workman
Ist party/workman
is entitled ?
is not entitled
to reinstatment
REASONS
7. Record of enquiry Proceedings is submitted. On
its careful reading, I find that 7 witnesses were examined
for proving charges against 1st party. Their evidence is
recorded in detail. The enquiry is found legal. Learned
counsel of 1st party Mr. Shashi did not advance any
argument on the point and the findings of the Enquiry
Officer are supported by satisfactory evidence. I have
carefully gone through the record of enquiry and find that
there is sufficient evidence to prove charges against 1st
party/workman. Therefore I record my finding on Point
No.1 in affirmative.
8. As to Point No.2 , learned counsel for 1st party
Mr. Shashi submits that 1st party/workman is no more.
That pensionary benefits may be allowed to the dependents
of 1st party. Invoking powers under Section 11 A of I.D .
Act, learned counsel for IInd party Mr. Shankaran Nair
opposed the submissions on behalf of 1st party. Mr. Nair
taken view to the charges proved in enquiry against 1st
party. Learned counsel further submits that charges against
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4659
1st party are proved. There are no allegations for malafide
part of IInd party therefore provisions of Section 11-A of
I.D. Act is not attracted. That charge of attempt of theft of
111.50 Kg. Brass scrap are proved. Such act cannot be
tolerated. Therefore punishment imposed by Competent
authority cannot be interfered. In support of his argument,
learned counsel for IInd party relies on ratio held in case
of Jantha Bazar (South Kanara Central Cooperative
Wholesale Stores Ltd.) and other versus Secretary,
Sahakari Noukarara Sangha and others reported in 2000
(7) Supreme Court Cases 517 . Their Lordship of Apex
Court dealing with powers under Section 11- A of I.D.Act—
Scope of Judicial review held the discretion of employer
exercised in imposing penalty after misconduct proved in
domestic enquiry held Labour Court cannot substitute
the penalty imposed by the employer. Next reliance is
placed in the case of General Secretary, South Indian
Cashew Factories Workers Union Vrs. Managing Director,
Kerala State Cashew Development Corporation Ltd. and
Others reported in AIR 2006 (SC) Page 2208. Their Lordship
held that powers of Labour Court under Section 11-A to
interfere in punishment when no allegations of
victimization or malafide or unfair labour practice there is
clear finding that findings are not perverse and principles
of natural justice were complied with while conducting
enquiry. Labour Court has no power to interfere with
punishment imposed by management. Since Section 11-A
is not applicable to case other than dismissal or discharge
Labour Court has no power to reappraise evidence to
findout whether findings of Enquiry Officer are correct or
not or whether punishment imposed is adequate or not. In
case of workman of Balmadies Estates Versus Management
of Balmadies Estates and others reported in Case No.
2008(4) SCC-Pg. 517. Their Lordship of Apex Court dealing
with interference by Labour Court, Tribunal. Their Lordship
considered two workmen dismissed from service for
committing theft, on completion of enquiry, Labour Court
held that there was no direct evidence to show that the
two workmen had committed theft. Evidence was not
properly appreciated by Enquiry Officer and finding of
guilt was based on very slender evidence. Lordship held
on facts, findings of Labour Court were perverse and can
be termed to be based on misconception of law. High Court,
therefore, rightly observed that the evidence could not
have been brushed aside by Labour Court in the manner
done.
9. In the present case, there is absolutely no
argument that whether the findings of the Enquiry Officer
are supported by evidence in the enquiry proceedings.
Considering the charge of attempt of commit theft of 111.50
Kg. Brass scrap proved against 1st party, I find no reason
to interfere the punishment of his removal. On the above
reason, I record my findings in Point No.2 &3 as Negative.
10. In the result, Award is passed as under—
“Punishment of removal of 1st party/workman
imposed by the IInd party/management is just and
legal. Workman is not entitled to reinstatement
neither his dependents are entitiled to pensionary
benefits. Claim of 1st party is rejected.
R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 10 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1650-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj egkizca/d
LD;ksfjVh isij fey] gks'kaxkckn ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj
muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa
dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ
la[;k lh-th-vkbZ-Vh-@,y-lh-@vkj-@46@05) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS
tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 28&6&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y&16011@01@2005&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)º
lkse ukFk] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the10th July, 2013
S.O. 1650.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGIT/
LC/R/46/05) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal
-cum- Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure
in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation
to the management of The General Manager, Security
Paper Mill, Hoshangabad, which was received by the
Central Government on 28-6-2013.
[ No. L-16011/01/2005-IR (DU)]
SOM NATH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/46/05
Shri R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer.
The General Secretary,
SPM Employees Union,
Type-II/ 63, Phase-II,
SPM, Hoshangabad
. . .Workman/Union
Versus
The General Manager,
Security Paper Mill,
Hoshangabad.
. . . Management
AWARD
Passed on this 15th day of March, 2013
1. As per letter dated 26-5-2005 by the Government
of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is
4660
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under
Section 10 of the I.D. Act, 1947 as per Notification No.
L-16011/1/2005-IR(DU) dateed 26-5-2005. The dispute
under reference relates to :
“ Whether the action of the management of General
Manager, Security Paper Mill, Hoshangabad in not
giving promotion as a Senior Foreman in E & I
Section and not giving benefits to Shri B.K.Gupta
since 1983 upto till date is justified? If not, to what
relief the workman is entitled for?”
2. After notice, 1st party/workman failed to appear
and submit statement of claim. 1st party is proceeded
exparte on 10-9-09. IInd party filed Written Statement. IInd
party submits that 1st party workman was appointed as
Electrician Higher Scale Gr.II in the scale of pay Rs.330-8-
390. He had filed an application under Section 15 of
Payment of Wages Act before Labour Court No.2 Bhopal
in 1986 claiming amount Rs. 3615.50 towards difference of
wages for the period. His application was dismissed. The
1st party preferred appeal against the said order. The said
appeal was decided by Industrial Court, Bhopal on
10-9-98. The appeal was allowed. Ilnd party filed Writ
Petition No. 1842/99. However during pendency of Writ
Petition, wages Rs.ll,212 were paid.
3. IInd party further submits that 1st party workman
was working as Electrician in Electrical Section when the E
& I Section was newly created due to modernization. 1st
party/workman had worked for 5 months and 5 days and
he was transferred to his original section. He is not fulfilling
the eligibility for promotion post claimed by him. Such
post requires 2 year experience. IInd party prays for
rejection of the claim of 1st party.
4. Ist party has not filed statement of claim nor
produced any evidence. Ilnd party filed evidence of his
witness Shri Mahapatra denying claim of the 1st party
covering all contention in the Written Statement filed by
Ilnd party. There is absolutely no evidence for establishing
claim of 1st party for permanent post. Therefore the claim
of 1st party deserves to be rejected.
5. In the result, award is passed as under:-
“ The demand of 1st party workman under reference
is not supported by any evidence of 1st party
workman. His claim is rejected.”
R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 10 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1651-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj iatkc ,.M
fla/ cSad ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds
chp vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;&I] fnYYkh ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 18@2009)
dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 10&7&2013 dks çkIr
gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y&12011@91@2008&vkbZvkj (ch&II)º
lqefr ldykuh] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the10th July, 2013
S.O. 1651.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (I.D. No. 18/2009)
of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour
Court-I, New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the
Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to
the management of Punjab and Sind Bank and their
workman which was received by the Central Government
on 10-7-2013.
[ No. L-12011/91/2008-IR(B-II)]
SUMATI SAKLANI, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE DR. R. K. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER,
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIL TRIBUNAL
NO. 1, KARKARDOOMA COURTS COMPLEX,
DELHI
I.D. No. 18/2009
Shri Yashwant Bhandari through
Uttranchal Bank Workers Organisation,
32, Chakrata Road,
Dehradun.
. . . Workman
Versus
The Zonal Manager,
Punjab and Sind Bank,
Regional Office, A. K. Road,
Dehradun.
. . . Management
AWARD
A Computer Terminal Operator was transferred to
Haridwar branch from Rishikesh branch of Punjab and
Sindh Bank (in short the bank) in July, 2004. Rishikesh
branch of the bank falls under Distt. Dehradun while
Haridwar branch is within the territory of Distt. Haridwar,
Uttarakhand. The Computer Terminal Operator raised a
demand for his re-transfer to Rishikesh branch. It was not
conceded to by the bank. He demanded lump sum of
Rs. 400 per month in accordance with Schedule VI
appended to the 8th Bipartite Settlement. This demand
was also not conceded to. He approached the Uttaranchal
Bank Workers’ Organization (in short the union) for
redressal of his grievance. The union approached the
Conciliation Officer, before that forum too, the claim was
contested. Since the conciliation proceedings ended into
a failure, the Conciliation Officer transmitted his report to
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4661
the appropriate Government. On consideration of report
of the Conciliation officer, the appropriate Government
referred the dispute to Central Government Industrial No.
II, New Delhi, for adjudication, vide order No. L-12011/91/
2008-IR(B-II), New Delhi dated 05-02-2009, with following
terms :
“Whether the action of the management of Punjab
and Sindh Bank in denying transfer to Shri Yashwant
Bhandari, CTO, Haridwar branch back to Rishikesh
Branch from where he was transferred or to a nearby
branch after reaching to the age of 58 years and also
depriving him payment of Rs.400.00 as displacement
allowance from the date he joined his duties at
Haridwar brahch is legal and justified ? What relief
the concerned employee is entitled?”
2. Claim statement was filed by the Computer Terminal
Operator, namely, Shri Yashwant Bhandari pleading that
he was transferred to Haridwar branch of the bank in July ,
2004 from Rishikesh branch to Haridwar branch,
Uttarakhand. He raised a demand for his retransfer to
Rishikesh branch of the bank, which demand was avoided
by the bank. Lump sum amount of Rs.400.00 per month
was also not paid to him. Vide letter dated 26-10-2007, he
made such a demand, which was declined by the Zonal
Manager. He raised a demand through the union before
the Conciliation Officer. Conciliation proceedings resulted
into a failure. It has been claimed that an award, granting
lump sum of Rs. 400.00 per month from July, 2004 to August
2008 may be passed in his favour.
3. Claim was demurred by the bank pleading that he
was transferred to Haridwar branch in July, 2004. Settlement
vis-a vis deployment allowance was signed between the
bank and majority Union on 02-06-2005, which was effective
from the date of signing the settlement. In view of these
facts, claimant is not entitled to relief claimed. Concept of
deployment was brought into vogue by the 7th Bipartite
settlement wherein bank was empowered to identify
pockets of surplus/deficit in areas of operation in different
centres. Imbalances in deployment of staff are corrected
by the bank by way of settlement at each bank level. 8th
Bipartite settlement provided that deployment of non-
subordinate staff shall be made in accordance with terms
and conditions set forth under Schedule VI of that
settlement. Since there was no identification of pockets of
surplus/deficit areas of operation, no specific policy to
govern the deployment was brought into application.
4. Bank further pleads that the union espousing the
cause has a microscopic strength of only 28 workmen and
as such espousal is not by substantial number of
employees. These facts make it apparent that the dispute
is not an Industrial Dispute. Claimant was promoted on
01.09.2008 and ceased to be a workman. He was transferred
to Rishikesh branch, on 01-09-2008 and his dispute has
become infructuous. It has been claimed that facts pleaded
by the claimant may be discarded and an award be passed
in favour of the bank.
5. On pleadings of the parties, following issues were
settled :—
(1)
Whether the workman is entitled to deployment
allowance of Rs. 400.00 per month from July, 2004
to 31.08.2008 ?
(2)
As in terms of reference.
(3)
Relief.
6. Vide notification No.A-11016/3/2009-CLS-II, New
Delhi dated 03.04.2013, additional charge of the post of
the Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial
Tribunal No. II, New Delhi, was assigned to the
undersigned by the appropriate Government and thus the
case reached this Tribunal for adjudication.
7. Claimant tendered his affidavit dated 29-04-2010
as evidence. However, he did not come forward to undergo
rigors of cross-examination. Hence, no opportunity could
be accorded to the bank to purify facts detailed by the
claimant in his affidavit, by an ordeal of cross-examination.
Since the bank could not avail opportunity of cross-
examination, facts detailed in affidavit dated 29.04.2010
cannot be read in evidence.
8. Since there was no evidence from the side of the
claimant in that regard, the bank also opted not to adduce
any evidence in the matter.
9. Arguments are heard at the bar Ms. Kitu Bajaj,
authorized representative, advanced arguments on behalf
of the bank. None came forward to raise submissions on
behalf of the claimant. I have given my careful
consideration to the arguments advanced at the bar and
cautiously perused the record. My findings on issues
involved in the contraversy are as follows :—
Issue No. 1
10. Though there is no, evidence on behalf of the
claimant, yet facts pleaded by him are not in dispute. It
has been highlighted by the claimant. that he was
transferred from Rishikesh branch to Haridwar branch of
the bank in July 2004, which fact has been candidly
admitted by the bank in its written statement. He also
raised an issue that 8th Bipartite settlement entitles him
for grant of lump sum amount of Rs. 400 per month, on his
transfer from one district to another. Signing of the Bipartite
Settlement and grant of lump sum amount, on being
deployed to another district are also not a matter of dispute.
Consequently, it is evident that these admitted facts would
lead this Tribunal to articulate of the controversy in a just
manner.
11. Now, before proceeding for adjudication, the
Tribunal is required to adjudicate an incidental issue. In
4662
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
its written statement, the bank pleads that the union
espousing the cause of the claimant has a microscopic
strength of only 28 employees, constituting barely 0,8%
of total number of workmen in the organization. It has
been asserted that in the absence of necessary espousal
by substantial number of employees, no industrial dispute
exists between the parties. As projected above, the bank
had also not adduced any evidence in the matter. Above
pleadings make it apparent that espousal of the claim by
the union is not a disputed fact. The bank asserts that the
union has only microscopic strength of only 28 workmen.
Hence question for consideration would be as to whether
the dispute raised by the appropriate Government for
adjudication is an industrial dispute. For an answer to this
proposition, definition of the term ‘industrial dispute’ is to
be construed. Section 2(k) of the Industrial Disputes Act,
1947 (in short the Act), defines the term ‘industrial dispute’.
which definition .is extracted thus :
“2(k) “Industrial dispute” means any dispute or
difference between employers and employers, or
between employers and workmen, or between
workmen and workmen, which is connected with
the employment or non-employment or the terms of
employment or with the conditions of labour, of any
person;”
The definition of “industrial dispute” referred above,
can be divided into four parts, viz. (1) factum of dispute,
(2) parties to the dispute, viz.(a) employersand employers,
(b) employer and workmen, or (c) workmen and workmen,
(3) subject matter of the dispute, which should be
connected with—(i) employment or non employment, or
(ii) terms of employment, or (iii) condition of labour of any
person, and (4) it should relate to an “industry”.
13. The definition of “industrial dispute” is worded
in very wide terms and unless they are narrowed by the
meaning given to word ‘‘workman” it would seem to
include all ‘‘employers” all ‘‘employment’’ and all
‘‘workmen”, whatever the nature or scope of the
employment may be. Therefore, except in the case where
there can be a dispute between the employers and
employers and workmen and workmen, one of the parties
to an industrial dispute must be an employee or a class of
employees. The first point, therefore, to be noted, perhaps
self evident, is that the phrase “employer and workmen”,
the plural may include singular on either side or any
permutation of singular or plural, the masculine including
the feminine. In order, therefore, to determine as to whether
a controversy or difference or a dispute is an “an industrial
dispute’’ or not, it must first be determined whether the
workman concerned or workmen sponsoring his cause
satisfy the conditions of clause (s) of section 2 of the Act.
14. Here in the case, the bank dispute that the
claimant has ceased to be a workman within the meaning
of clause of Section 2 of the Act. As per facts pleaded by
the parties, the claimant was working as a Computer
Terminal Operator in the bank when he was transferred
from Rishikesh bank to Haridwar branch of the bank. He
was promoted as an Officer on 1-9-2008. In the dispute,
under consideration, benefits for the period from July 2004
to 31st August, 2008 are to be adjudicated. Thus it is
evident that the benefits, which are to be articulated,
pertains to the period when claimant was working as a
Computer Terminal Operator. There is no dispute that he
was a workman, when the claimant was performing duties
of a Computer Terminal Operator. It would not make any
difference that from 1-9-2008, the claimant ceased to be a
workman. The objection is, accordingly, discarded.
15. The Apex Court put gloss on the definition of
“industrial dispute” in Dimakuchi Tea Estate (1958 (1) LLJ
500) and ruled that the expression “any person” in clause
(k) of Section 2 of the Act must be read subject to such
limitation and qualification as arise from the context, the
two crucial limitations are (i) the dispute must be a real
dispute between the parties to the dispute (as indicated in
the first two parts of the definition clause) so as to be
capable of settlement or adjudication by one party to the
dispute giving necessary relief to other, and (2) the person
regarding whom the dispute is raised must be one for
whose employment, non employment, terms of employment
or conditions of labour, as case may be, the parties dispute
for a direct or substantial interest. Where workman raised
a dispute as against their employment, the person
regarding whose employment, non employer, terms of
employment or conditions of labour, the dispute is raised
need not be strictly speaking “workman” within the
meaning of the Act, but must be one in whose employment,
non employment, terms of employment, or conditions of
labour the workmen as a class have adirect or substancial
interest. The observations made by the Apex Court are to
be extracted thus :
"We also agree with the expression "any person" is
not co extensive with any workman, particular or
otherwise, equal with other, that the crucial test is
one of community of interest and the person
regarding whom the dispute is raised must be one in
whose employment, non employment, terms, of
employment, conditions of labour (as the case may
be) the parties to the dispute have a direct or
substantial interest. Whether such direct or
substantial interest has been established in a
particular case will depend on its facts and
circumstances. ”
16. “In Kyas Construction Company (Pvt ) Ltd. (1958
(2) LLJ 660), the Apex Court ruled that an industrial dispute
heed not be a dispute between the employer and his
workman and that the definition of the expression
"industrial dispute "is wide enough to cater a dispute
raised by the employer's workman with regard to non-
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4663
employment of others, who may not be employed as
workman at the relevant time. The Apex Court in Bombay
Union of Journalist [1961 (II) LLJ 436] has observed that in
each case in ascertaining whether an individual dispute
has acquired the character of an industrial dispute, the test
is whether at the date of reference, the dispute was taken
up as submitted by the union of the workmen of the
employer against whom, the dispute is raised by an
individual workman or' by an appreciable number of
workmen. In order, therefore, to convert an individual
dispute into an industrial dispute, it has to be established
that it has been taken up by the union of employees of the
establishment or by an appreciable number of the
employees of the establishment. As far as union of the
workmen of establishment itself is concerned, the problem
of espousal by them generally presents little difficulty, since
such workmen who are members of such unions generally
have a continuity of interest with an individual employee
who is one of their fellow workman. But difficulty arise
when the cause of a workman, in a particular establishment
is sponsored by a union which is not of the workmen of
that establishment but is one of which membership is open
to workmen of their establishment as well as in that industry.
In such a case a union which has only microscopic number
of the workmen as its member, cannot sponsor any dispute
arising between the workmen and the management. A
representative character of the union has to be gathered
from the strength of the actual number of co workers
sponsoring the dispute. The mere fact that a substantial
number of workmen of the establishment in which the
concerned workman was employee were. also members of
the union would not constitute sponsorship. It must be
shown that they were connected together and arrived at
an understanding by a resolution or by other means and
collectively submitted the dispute.
17. The expression "industrial disputes" has been
construed by the Apex Court to include individual disputes,
because of the scheme of the Act.' In Raghu Nath Gopal
Patvardhan [1957(1) LLJ 27] the Apex Court ruled as to
what dispute can be called as an industrial dispute. It was
laid thereon that (1) a dispute between the employer and a
single workman cannot be an industrial dispute, (2) it cannot
per-se be an industrial dispute but may become if it is taken
up by a trade union or a number of workmen. In Dharampal
Prem Chand [1965 (1) LLJ 668] it was commanded by the
Apex Court that a dispute raised by a single workman cannot
become an industrial dispute unless it is.supported either
by his union or in the absence of a union by substantial
number of workmen. Same law was laid in the case of Indian
Express Newspaper (Pvt.) Limited [1970 (1) LLJ 132].
However In Western lndia Match Company [1970 (II) LLJ
256], the Apex Court referred the precedent in Diakuchi
Tea Estate's case [1958 (1) LLJ 500] and ruled that a dispute
relating to "any person becomes a dispute where the person
in respect of whom it is raised is one in whose employment,
non employment, terms of employment or conditions of
labour, the parties, dispute for a direct or substantial
interest".
18. What a substantial or considerable number of
workmen would be in a given case, depend on particular
facts of the case. The fact that an "industrial dispute", is
supported by other workmen will have to be established
either in the form, of a resolution of the union of which
workman may be member or of the workmen themselves
who support the dispute or in any other manner. From the
mere fact that a general union, at whose instance an
"industrial dispute" concerning an individual workman is
referred for adjudication has on its roll a few of the workmen
of the establishment as its members, it cannot be inferred
that the individual dispute has been converted into an"
“industrial dispute". The Tribunal has therefore, to consider
the question as to how many of the fellow workman actually
espoused the cause of the concerned workman by
participating in the particular resolution of the Union. In
the absence of a such a determination by the Tribunal, it
cannot be said that the individual dispute acquired the
character of an industrial dispute and the Tribunal will not
acquire jurisdiction to adjudicate upon the dispute.
Nevertheless, in order to make a dispute an industrial
dispute, it is not necessary that there should always be a
resolution of substantial or appreciable number of workmen.
What is necessary is that there should be some express or
collective will of a substantial or an appreciable member of
the workmen treating the cause of the individual workman
as their own cause. Law to this effect was laid in P.
Somasundrameran [1970 (1)LLJ 558].
19. It is not necessay that the sponsoring union is a
registered trade union or a recognized trade union. Once it
is shown that a body of substantial number of workmen
either acting through a union or otherwise had sponsored
the workman’s cauae, it is sufficient to convert it into an
industrial dispute. In Pardeep Lamp Works [1970(1) LLJ507]
complaints relating to dispute of ten workmen were filed
before the Conciliation Officer by the indivdual workmen
themselves. But their case was subsequently taken up by
a new union formed by a large number of co-workmen, if
not a majority of them. Since this union was not registered
or recognized, the workman elected five representatives
to prosecute the Cases of ten dismissed workmen. Thus
Cases of the dismissed workmen were espoused by the
new union, yet unregistered and unrecognized. The Apex
Court held that the fact that these disputes were not taken
up by a registered or recognized union does not mean that
they were not “industrial dispute”.
20. It is not expedient that same union should remain
incharge of that dispute till its adjudication. The dispute
may be espoused by the workmen of an establishment,
through a particular union for making such a dispute an
“industrial dispute”, while the workman may be represented
before the Tribunal for the purpose of section 36 of the Act
4664
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
by a member of executive or office bearer of altogether
another union. The crux of the matter is that the dispute
should be a dispute between the employer and his workmen.
It is not necessary that the dispute must be espoused or
conducted only by a registered trade union. Even if trade
union ceases to be registered trade union during the
continuance of the adjudication proceedings that would
not affect the maintainability of the order of reference. Law
to this effect was laid by the High Court of Orissa in Gammon
India Limited [1974 (II) LLJ 34[. For ascertaining as to
whether an individual dispute has acquired character of an
individual dispute, the test is whether on the date of the
reference the dispute was taken up as supported by the
union of the workmen of the employer against whom the
dispute is raised by the individual workman or by an
appreciable number of the workman. In other words, the
validity of the reference of an industrial dispute must be
judged on the facts as they stood on the date of the
reference and not necessarily on the date when the cause
occurs. Reference can be made to a precedent in Western
India Match Co. Ltd. [1970 (II) LLJ 256].
21. With the above legal proposition in mind, now it
would be ascertained as to whether the dispute espoused
by the union is an industrial dispute. At the cost of
repetition, it is pointed out that the bank nowhere disputes
that the union has espoused the cause of claimant for
redressal. Consequently, it is apparent that the union
expressed its collective will and took up the cause of the
claimant as their own. The bank nowhere questions the
proposition that the union espoused the cause and applied
to the appropriate Government in the prescribed manner,
as provided by sub-section (2) of section 10 of the Act, for
taking steps for reference of the dispute to an industrial
adjudicator. An application was moved by the union in
consonance with provisions of rule 3 and 4 of the Industrial
Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. One may announce that
the President and Secretary of the Union signed the
application, after expression of collective will by members
of the union to take up cause of the claimant as their own.
22. The bank projects that there were 28 member of
the union, who constitute barely 0.8% of the total number
of workmen in the organization. It has nowhere been
projected as to how many workmen were there in Rishikesh
or Haridwar branch of the bank or in the region, under
consideration. The bank runs its Head Office, Zonal Office
and branches throughout the country. For espousing case
of a workman, union representing employees of a particular
region/branch may take up his cause. Even otherwise, it
was for the bank to establish, by way of cogent evidence
that the union has only microscopic strength of its members.
By simple assertion of facts in its written statement, the
bank would not be able to dislodge the proposition that
the union represents considerable number of employees in
the bank. Since the bank has not been able to dislodge the
claim of the Computer Terminal Operator to the effect that
his case was espoused by the union having substantial or
considerable number of its workmen as its member in the
establishment of the bank, findings cannot be recorded to
this effect that the dispute raised by the union had not
acquired status of an industrial dispute. Resultantly, it is
concluded that the dispute referred for adjudication is an
industrial dispute and the Trlbunal has rightly invoked its
jurisdiction for adjudication.
23. Now I would advert to the facts of the present
controversy. Employees in any concern are, in ordinary
course of business, liable to be transferred. No concern
can possibly run if it has no right to transfer its employees
from one branch to another. The transfer might cause some
inconvenience but all employees are bound to suffer
inconvenience unless there is some stipulation in their
condition of services to the effect that they will remain at a
particular branch or place of business. Thus, liability to be
transferred is a normal incidence of service in any concern
and it does not necessarily involve punishment. So the
employer has got a right in law to transfer an employee
from one branch to another or from one concern to another,
which is also under the same employer.
24. In effecting transfer of workmen from one branch
to another, the employer must act bonafide and in the
interest of its business. The existence of power to transfer
and its scope and exercise of it are entirely two different
questions. Colourable exercise by the employer of his power
to transfer a workman from one establishment at one place
to another at different place can always be a subject matter
of industrial dispute. In considering the question whether
transfer from one place to another had effected a change in
the conditions of service of a workman, following types of
cases must be considered, namely :—
(a)
Where there are standing orders or the conditions
of service have been reduced to writing; and
(i) those may either contain provisions to
deal with transfers, or
(ii) they may not.
(b)
Where there are no standing orders at all or any
other instrument in writing to deal with service
conditions.
25. In cases falling under (b) or (a) (ii), liability to be
transferred from one establishment to another at a different
place by the employer or at his instance is an incidence of
service, that is to say, an implied condition of service and
the workman concerned cannot successfully complain
unless he can show that the transfer was made by way of
punishment. In cases falling within (a) (i) above two broad
questions arise for consideration, namely - (i) whether the
rules or provisions dealing with the matter of transfer are
of the fullest amplitude, that is to say, whether they cover
the whole field of transfer, or (ii) whether they are not.
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4665
In the first case, those rules or provisions would be the
only governing rules or provisions on the subject. Whether
the rules regarding transfer are of the fullest amplitude or
not would depend upon consideration of the standing
orders or contract of service. In the second type of cases,
it must be seen as to what extent the special provisions or
rules in the standing orders have effected or curtailed the
general power of transfer of the employer which is implied
in every contract of service.
26. Powers of the employer to transfer an employee
from one place to another necessarily includes two things,
namely—
(i)
It can only be taken away or curtailed or regulated
in express terms, and
(ii)
that the power is only in the employer which means
that only the employer or a person either expressly
authorized by him or who can be said to have that
authority impliedly, can exercise that power.
27. As detailed below, Shastry Award and Settlement
dated 02-06-2005, place restrictions on the powers of the
Bank to effect rotational transfers of its employees. Transfer
of an employee whith is justified by exigencies of service
and also in accordance with the standing orders cannot be
said to be creating hardship to the employee. In such
transfer, question of hardship cannot be construed to treat
the transfer unfair. In Shastry Award, the policy of transfer
of the staff was penned down in Para 535. Relying on Sen
Award, directives were given, which are reproduced as
follows:
(i)
Every registered Bank employees' union, from time
to time, shall furnish the Bank with the names of
the President, Vice President and the Secretaries
of the Union;
(ii)
Except in very special cases, whenever the
transfer of any of the above mentioned office
bearers is contemplated, at least five clear working
days' notice should be put up on the notice board
of the Bank of such contemplated action;
(iii)
Any representation, written or oral, made by the
union shall be considered by the Bank;
(iv)
If any order of transfer is ultimately made, a record
shall be made by the Bank of such representation
and the Bank’s reasons for regarding them as
inadequate; and
(v)
The decision shall be communicated to the union
as well as to the employee concerned.
28.Besides the above, 7th Bipartite Settlement was
signed on 27-03-2000 wherein it was provided that the bank
may identify pockets of surplus/deficit areas of operation
in different centres. Imbalances of deployment of staff
may be corrected, and for that purpose, policy may be
resolved by way of bank level agreements. 8th Bipartite
Settlement was signed on 02-06-2005 wherein detailed policy
of deployment was agreed upon between the union and
the IBA. Clause 32 of the said settlement details that in
continuation of clause 32 of 7th Bipartite Settlement dated
27-03-2000, it is agreed between the parties that deployment
of non-subordinate staff in banks shall be in accordance to
the terms and conditions set forth in Schedule VI of the
settlement. Schedule VI appended to the settlement brings
in certain benefits/concessions in favour of the workmen
staff. Those benefits/concessions are detailed herein below:
‘‘(i)
A workman in the non-subordinate cadre is liable
to be deployed, anywhere within a ‘District’,
irrespective of the distance involved.
(ii)
In cases necessitating deployment outside the
District, the workman concerned may be deployed
to any branch/office of the bank situated outside
the District up to a distance not exceeding 100
km. from his present place of posting.
(iii)
Bank may Identify, based on length of stay at the
centre/branch/office, the number of workmen
employees, to be redeployed from each centre/
branch / office to meet its requirements.
(iv)
The period of deployment shall be 2 years in a
difficult centre decided by the bank in accordance
with the Government guidelines and 3 years in
other centers.
(v)
Repatriation to the original centre shall be after
serving in the deployed centre for period as in
(iv) above. In case it is not administratively
possible for the bank to repatriate the employee
to his original centre after the above period, the
employee may be required to give 3 centers of his
choice so that he can be transferred to anyone of
the 3 centers opted by him.
(vi)
Female employees above the age of 55 and male
employees above the age of 56 shall be exempt
from redeployment. However, if the required and
eligible number of employees is not available to
be deployed in terms of the Settlement, the age
norms as above may be suitably relaxed up to the
age of 58 years so as to ensure that the required
and eligible numbers of employees are deployed
to the identified centers.
(vii)
Employees having mentally retarded/spastic
children, certified as such by the attending Doctor,
may be deployed only at centers where
specialised treatment for such children and special
facilities of their schooling are available.
(viii)
Employees affected by serious ailments requiring
specialised treatment, as certified by the attending
Doctor, will be deployed only at centers where
4666
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
medical facilities for treatment of such ailments
are available.
(ix)
Redeployment of physically handicapped/
challenged employees shall be in accordance with
the extant Government guidelines.
(x)
A workman in the non-subordinate cadre so long
as he serves in the deployed centre shall draw a
lump sum amount of Rs. 400 p.m. (not ranking for
any other benefit) besides protection of
emoluments drawn at the original centre. These
shall cease on the employee's repatriation to the
original centre.
(xi)
The above lump sum amount is not payable in
case of transfers made at the request of the
employee.
(xii)
In North-Eastern States, banks may decide on the
level and extent of deployment having regard to
their requirements within the above norms.
(xiii)
The above provisions on deployment are without
prejudice to the provisions of paragraphs 535 and
536 of the Sastry Award relating to transfer of
workmen.
(xiv)
The above provisions on deployment shall be
the minimum applicable to all the banks which are
parties to this Settlement. Parties agree that any
existing bank-level settlement on transfer or
deployment whose provisions are restrictive and
not up to the minimum provisions on deployment
as mentioned above will be modified/terminated
as per procedure under the Industrial Disputes
Act so as to give effect to the above-mentioned
provisions on deployment.
(xv)
Any bank which is a party to this Settlement and
having bank-level Settlement on transfer or
deployment may, however, modify and improve
upon the above provisions to suit the needs of
the bank ensuring, however, that the norms
relating to the geographical minimum area of
deployment, period of stay at the deployed centre,
conditions for repatriation as mentioned
hereinabove are not relaxed or diluted in any
manner.
(xvi)
In banks which are parties to this Settlement where
bank level settlements/policies on transfer or
deployment of workmen exist which provide for
transferability of employees over a larger
geographical area, such bank level settlements
on transfer or deployment shall remain operative”.
29. The bank raised an issue that the 8th Bipartite
settlement was signed on 02-06-1995 while claimant was
transferred to Haridwar branch in July 2004. According to
the bank, terms of 8th Bipartite Settlement nowhere comes
for the benefit of the claimant. Alas! this arguments is not
available to the bank. Clause 39 of the 8th Bipartite
Settlement highlights that the settlement shall be binding
on the parties for five years from 01-11-2002. Clause 38 of
the said settlement speaks of implementation of various
benefits, agreed to be granted in favour of the workmen
staff from different dates as detailed in that clause. As
noted, benefits relating to scale of pay, 6th stagnation
increment, slab rate, dearness allowance, special pay and
consolidated wages of part time employees working less
than 6 hours per week were to be implemented from
01-11-2002. Dearness allowance on single slab rate was to
be implemented from 01-02-2005. Professional qualification
pay, house rent allowance, city compensatory allowance,
provident fund, gratuity, recovery of house rent, fixed
personal pay, hill and fuel allowance, transport allowance
and annual medical aid, special area allowance, project area
allowance, split duty allowance and cycle allowance were
to be implemented from 01-11-2002. Provisions relating to
pension were to be implemented from 01.05.2005. Clauses
relating to hospital expenses, halting allowance,
compensation on loss on transfer, expenses on road
transfer, leave fare concession and overtime allowance were
to be implemented from the date of settlement i.e.
02-06-2005. Washing allowance provisions were to be
implemented from 1st August, 2004. All other items agreed,
but not covered, were to be implemented from the date of
settlement, i.e. 02-06-2005.
30. Deployment allowance as provided in Schedule
VI of the settlement was to be implemented from the date of
settlement, i.e. 02.06.2005. This proposition led the bank to
a confusion. As clause 39 spells, settlement is binding on
the parties for five years from 01.11.2002. Thus this
settlement became operative from 1st November, 2002.
When claimant was transferred to Haridwar branch of the
bank in July 2004, this settlement was deemed to be
operative, on account of retrospective operation accorded
to it by clause 39, as referred above. Implementation clause
simply points out as to from which date a particular benefit
would be implemented. Thus, it is apparent that in July
2004 the settlement was in operation and deployment
allowance of Rs. 400.00 per month was to be implemented
from 02-06-2005. It would mean that all the workmen staff
deployed to other centres after 01-11-2002 would get
deployment allowance with effect from 02-06-2005.
Consequently, it is crystal clear that the case of the claimant
is covered in all four corners of provisions of Schedule VI
of the 8th Bipartite Settlement. Claimant was entitled to get
deployment allowance in lump sum @ Rs. 400.00 per month
from 02-06-2005 till 31-05-2008, the period for which he
remained deployed at Haridwar branch of the bank. The
issue is, accordingly, answered in favour of the claimant
and against the bank.
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4667
Issue No. 2.
31. Since the claimant has been retransferred to
Rishikesh branch of the bank, where he joined on
01.09.2008, there is no occasion for the tribunal to
adjudicate as to whether the claimant is entitled for retransfer
to that branch. Consequently, the issue of re transfer
becomes infructuous. On the other hand, no evidence has
been brought forward by the claimant to the effect as to
when he reached the age of 58 years and entitled for re-
transfer to Rishikesh branch. The issue relating to
entitlement of lumpsum of Rs.400.00 as deployment
allowance has already been answered In favour of the
claimant, as referred above. Issues, raised in the reference
order are answered accordingly.
Relief
32. Since the claimant has already been transferred
back to Rishikesh branch of the bank, there is no occasion
for the Tribunal to adjudicate as to whether denial by the
bank to transfer the claimant to Rishikesh branch is legal
and justified. As detailed above, claimants entitled to
deployment allowance in terms of Schedule VI of the 8th
Bipartite Settlement from 02-06-2005 to31-08-2008 @
Rs.400.00 per month, which allowance comes to
Rs.15586.66.The bank shall make payment of the said
deployment allowance to the claimant within a period of 30
days from the date the award becomes operative. An award
is, accordingly, passed. It be sent to the appropriate
Government for Publication.
Dated : 27-6-2013
Dr. R.K. YADAV, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 10 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1652-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj dsujk cSad ds
çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/
esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@
Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k lhth vkbZVh@
,ylh@vkj@14@98) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks
15&6&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y&12012@248@1997&vkbZ vkj (ch&II)º
lqefr ldykuh] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 10th July, 2013
S.O. 1652.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Diputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT/
LC/R/14/98) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/
Labour Court, Jabalpur now as shown in the Annexure, in
the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation
to the management of Canara Bank and their workman
which was received by the Central Government on 15-6-
2013.
[No. L-12012/248/1997-IR(B-II)]
SUMATI SAKLANI, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR-COURT,
JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/14/98
PRESIDING OFFICER: SHRI R.B.PATLE
Shri Yogendra Rawat,
S/o Shri D.P.Rawat,
House No. 16, CTO Colony,
Bairagarh, Bhopal ......Workman
Versus
The Branch Manager,
Canara Bank,
204, Karamchand Chowk,
Post Box No. 221,
Jabalpur ........Management
AWARD
Passed on this 12th day of March, 2013
1. As per letter dated 6-8-1998 by the Government of
India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is
received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under
Section -10 of I.D.Act 1947 as per Notification No. L-l2012/
248/9-IR(B-II). The dispute under reference relates to:
“Whether the action of the management of Canara
Bank in terminating the services of Shri Yogendra
Rawat w. e. f. 25-11-87 is legal and justified? lf not,
to what relief the said workman is entitled?”
2. After receipt or the reference, notices were issued
to the parties. 1st party/workman filed his statement of
claim at Page 3/l to 3/6 of record. It is case of 1st party that
he reccived education upto 8th standard. He holds
qualification for post or peon/messenger. He had submitted
application for appointment in sub-staff cadre under Award
Staff. He was called for interview and thereafter was
appointed in the post of peon/messenger from 29-1-86. Ist
part /workman was posted at Canara Bank, Karamchand
Chowk Branch, Jabalpur. He was continued in service till
25-11 -87. He was paid wages for said period and its record
is available with IInd party/management. His services were
terminated without reasons in violation of Section 25-F of
I. D. Act, 1947.
3. 1st party/workman further submits that there was
regular vacancies of post of peon with IInd party/
management. Despite of regular vacancy, his services
were utilized as temporary employee. He was continuously
working in the Bank till 25-11-87 for 504 days without any
break. That IInd party/management has also violated
Section 25-F of I.D. Act. No letter of appointment or
termination was issued. He had completed 240 days
working preceding the date of his termination. That as per
4668
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Shastry Award, the employees completing 90 days service
in Bank are considered for regular appointment. The IInd
party/ management has victimized by not giving benefit
of said award. lst party/workman has illegally terminated
his srvice that his parents are victim of Bhopal Gas
Tragedy. His parents are sick. He prays for his
reinstatement with consequential benefits.
4. IInd party/management filed Written Statement at
page 5/1 to 5/7 of the record. The claim of lst party workman
is denied. It is contended by IInd party that procedure for
recruitment was not followed, his name was not sponsored
through Employment Exchange. He was engaged at
Jabalpur City Branch from 1986 to 87. He was never
appointed by the bank, no appointment letter was issued.
That 1st party/workman himself stopped coming to
Branch of his own violation. Preliminary objection is
submitted that the reference of dispute is not tenable.
Referring ratio held in several cases. IInd party/
management submitted that dispute is not tenable. Neither
Ist party/workman is not entitled to his reinstatement as
he has worked for short term period.
5. Ist party/workman submitted rejoinder at page
6/1 to 6/5 denying the material contentions in Written
statement filed by IInd party management. It is submitted
that the Written Statement is filed to mislead the Court to
establish that the workman was not an employee of the
bank in view of non-issuance of the appointment letter.
Termination of his service is covered as retrenchment
under Section 2(oo) of the I.D. Act. Ist party/workman
also referred ratio held in several cases and contended
that he is entitled to reinstatement with back wages.
6. Considering pleadings on record, the points
which arise for my consideration and determination are as
under. My findings are recorded against each of them for
the reasons as below:-
(i)
whether the action of the
In Negative
management of Canara Bank
in terminating the services of
Shri Yogendra Rawat w.e.f.
25-11-87 is legal and justified?
(ii) If not, what relief the
Ist party is
workman is entitled to?"
entitled to one
month's notice
pay and
retrenchment
compensation as
per final ordcr.
REASONS
7. The Ist party/workman is challenging his
termination from service for violation of Section 25-F, H of
I.D. Act claiming that he has continuously worked for 240
days prior to termination of his service. In the preceding
year, he had worked for 205 days as such he acquire
status of regular employee of the Bank. His services were
orally terminated without assigning any reason. No notice
was given. Ist party/workman did not submit his evidence.
On 6-11-2011, the workman was proceed exparte.
Management has filed affidavit of his witness Shri Sanjeev
Kumar. The witness of the management has stated that
procedure for recruitment of Ist party/workman was not
followed. Ist party/workman was trying to get back door
entry to get permanent appointment. That Ist party was
engaged temporarily at Jabalpur City Branch from 1986 to
87 on day to day basis. They have not undergone
recruitment process. The dispute is referred after 10 years.
He submitted that the workman had not completed 240
days working continuously preceding the year of his
termination . IInd party/management has also not given
the breakup of working period of Ist party/workman. Ist
party/workman has given detail of his working of total
504 days. The record relating to employment is presumed
to be in the custody of the management but the
management has not produced the record. That he has
worked 240 days before his date of termination, the total
working period as per his pleadings comes 29-1-86 to
25-11-87 for more than 22 months deserves to be accepted.
The pleadings and evidence of IInd party are silent about
one months termination notice as per Section 25-F of I.D.
Act or payment of retrenchment compensation. The
counsel for IInd party remained absent. No arguments are
advanced. In my considered view, Ist party/workman was
working for about 22 months. Retrenchment compensation
for 28 days and one months notice pay needs to be paid
to the Ist party/workman. For non-compliance of Section
25-F of the I.D. Act, the termination of Ist party/workman
is not just and legal. Accordingly I record my finding in
Point No. I in Negative.
8. Point No. 2—As per my finding in Point No.1,
termination of Ist party/workman is not legal for violation
of Section 25-F. However the Ist party had not produced
any evidence that he was appointed after following
recruitment procedure. Therefore Ist party/workman is not
entitled to reinstatement rather he will be entitled to notice
pay for one month and retrenchment compensation of 28
days wages. Accordingly for above reasons, I record my
finding in Point No. 2.
9. In the result, Award is passed as under :—
(1) Termination of services of Ist party/workman
Yogendra Rawat by Canara Bank on 25-11-1987 is
not legal.
(2) IInd party/management is directed to pay one
month’s salary/wages in lieu of notice and 28 days
wages towards retrenchment compensation @ last
wages paid to him. Amount as per this order be
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4669
paid within 30 days. In case of default, IInd party/
management shall pay 9% interest on above
amount from the date of order till its payment.
R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 11 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1653-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj iatkc us'kuy
cSad ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k
lhthvkbZ@,ylh@vkj@10@97) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh;
ljdkj dks 11&7&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y&12012@313@95&vkbZ vkj (ch&II)º
lqefr ldykuh] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 11th July, 2013
S.O. 1153.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Diputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGIT/
LC/R/10/97) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/
Labour Court, Jabalpur now as shown in the Annexure, in
the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation
to the management of Punjab National Bank and their
workman which was received by the Central Government
on 11-7-2013.
[ No. L-12012/313/95-IR(B-II)]
SUMATI SAKLANI, Section Officer.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM-LABOUR COURT,
JABALPUR
No. CGIT/LC/R/10/97
Presiding Officer : SHRI R.B.PATLE
The Assistant General Secretary, .
Punjab National Bank Employees Association,
Through Punjab National Bank.,
Sadar Bazar, Jabapur .....Workman/Union
Versus
Regional Manager,
Punjab National Bank.,
R.O. 124, Napier Town,
Jabalpur ....Management
AWARD
Passed on this 25th day of June, 2013
1. As per letter dated 3-1-97 by the Government of
India, Ministry of labour, New Delhi, the reference is
received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under
Section -10 of I.D. Act, 1947 as per Notification No.
L-12012/313/95-IR(B-II). The dispute under reference
relates to:
‘‘Whether the action of the management of Punjab
National Bank, J abalpur (MP) in reducing the basic
pay and consequently recovering amount w.e.f.
13-3-92 from the salary of Shri Makar Singh, Armed
Guard, Damoh Branch (MP) is legal and justified? If
not, to what relief the workman is entitled for?”
2. Ist party Union is challenging reduction in basic
pay and recovery from his salary w.e.f. 13-3-92 in the
dispute under reference. Even after issuing notices, the
Union has not participated in the proceeding, no statement
of claim is filed. Ist party is proceeded exparte on 13-7- 09.
3. Ilnd party management also not filed Written
Statement. From conduct of the Ist party, it is clear that the
parties are not pursuing or participating in the dispute.
4. In the result, award is passed as under:-
" Reference is disposed off as No Dispute Award."
R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 11 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1654-— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj dsujk cSad ds
çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/
esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/&dj.k@Je U;k;ky;&2] eqEcbZ ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k lh
thvkbZ Vh@2@11vkWiQ 2008) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh;
ljdkj dks 11&7&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y&12012@106@2007&vkbZ vkj (ch&II)º
lqefr ldykuh] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 11th July, 2013
S.O. 1654.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Diputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT-
2/11 of 2008) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/
Labour Court-2, Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure,
in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation
to the management of Canara Bank and their workman,
which was received by the Central Government on
11-7-2013.
[ No. L-12012/106/2007-IR(B-II)]
SUMATI SAKLANI, Section Officer
4670
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 2, MUMBAI
PRESENT : K.B.KATAKE, Presiding Officer
REFERENCE NO.CGIT -2/11 of 2008
EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE
MANAGEMENT OF
CANARA BANK
The Deputy General Manager,
Canara Bank
Disciplinary Authority, Disciplinary Action Cell
13th floor, Maker Tower 'E'
Cuffe Parade
Mumbai-400005.
AND
THEIR WORKMAN
Shri Chandrakant G. Kawle
Shivshankar Nagar
Salt Pan Road
Near Sonali Classes
Wadala
Mumbai-400 052.
APPEARANCES :
For the Employer
:
Mr. S.V. Alva, Advocate
For the Workman
:
Mr. J.H. Sawant, Advocate
Mumbai, dated the 22nd May, 2013
AWARD PART-I
1. The Government of India, Ministry of Labour &
Employment by its Order No. L-12012/106/2007 -IR (B-II)
dated 28-01-2008 in exercise of the powers conferred by
clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of
Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 have referred
the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for
adjudication:
"Whether the action of the management of Canara
Bank in imposing the punishment of Dismissal
without Notice on Shri Chandrakant G. Kawle, sub-
staff vide Order dated 29-01-2003 is legal, proper
and proportionate to the gravity of misconduct
allegedly committed by Shri Chandrakant G. Kawle?
If not, to what relief Shri Chandrakant G. Kawle is
entitled to and from which date and what other orders
are necessary in the matter?"
2. After receipt of the reference notices were issued
to both the parties. In response to the notice the second
party workman filed his statement of claim at Ex-3.
According to him he was permanent employee of the first
party Bank working as a sub staff. On 27-01-2001 an amount
of Rs. 5,50,000 was found missing from the Strong Room
of the Bank. The Bank lodged a Police complaint. The
statement of the second party in the nature of confession
was recorded by the Police under threat. A criminal case
was filed in the Court of Additional Chief Metropolitan
Magistrate Mumbai against the second party. In that case
the second party workman was acquitted by order dated
03-03-2007. In the meantime the first party had initiated
disciplinary proceedings against the second party on the
identical facts and charges as in the criminal case. During
the inquiry the Inquiry Officer did not follow the principles
of natural justice and findings recorded in the inquiry
proceedings were perverse. It was unlawful on the part of
the first party to initiate the disciplinary proceedings on
the same subject matter of the criminal case. There was no
legal evidence against the second party. The second party
had admitted the mistake as he was promised that no
disciplinary action would be taken. He was dismissed from
service on the basis of perverse findings of the disciplinary
authority. The said order of dismissal is illegal and
unjustified. The second party therefore prays that the said
order of dismissal without notice be set aside and the
second party workman be reinstated with full back-wages
and consequential benefits.
3. The first party management has resisted the
statement of claim vide its written statement at Ex-7.
According to them the reference is misconceived and not
maintainable. It is barred by limitation on the ground of
delay and laches. On 25-01-2001 second party was working
in Cash Department. He accompanied Shri J.M. Kamath to
the Strong Room who was asked to locate the cash slip
bundle. Mr. Kamath had collected second set of keys from
Shri B.T.Tapiwala, Officer. Mr. Kamath could not locate
the cash slip bundle and he left the strong room by handing
over second set of keys to the second party. Second party
alone was in the strong room for about 15 to 20 minutes
along with first set of keys which he had unauthorisedly
procured. At the end of the day cash to the extent of
Rs.6,00,000 was found short and notes of 500 and 100
denominations were found missing from the double lock
strong room. On 27-01-2001 at about 10.00 a.m. the Armed
Guard while entering the branch saw a plastic bag hanging
on the handle bar of the wooden door fixed in between the
main grill gate and the glass door at the entrance. An
amount of Rs.5,50,000 was found inside the said bag.
Bank lodged a police complaint. On interrogation by Police
second party confessed to have stolen the cash to the
extent of Rs.6,00,000 and also confessed to having kept
the plastic bag containing amount of Rs.5,50,000. The
Police also recovered an amount of Rs.45,000 from the
house of the second party.
4. The second party was put under suspension
pending disciplinary action for the misconduct. He was
paid subsistence allowance @ 1/3rd of the salary and
emolument for. the first three months of his suspension
and thereafter @ one half of his salary. The second party
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4671
was served with charge sheet dt. 22-09-2001. An
independent I O Mr. V.B. Moharir, Manager, Vigilance,
was appointed as Inquiry Officer. He conducted the inquiry
in eight sittings. The second party and the defence
representative of his choice Shri N.G.Nikam attended the
inquiry proceedings. Copies of full set of documents along
with list of documents and witnesses were given to the
second party along with charge-sheet well in advance. In
all 13 witnesses were examined in presence of second party
and his defence representative and they were allowed to
be cross examined by the second party. Opportunity was
also given to the second party to examine himself or any
other witness on his behalf. However neither he examined
himself or examined any other witness or produced any
document. Full and fair opportunity was given to the
second party to defence himself in the inquiry proceeding.
The Inquiry Officer submitted his report. Copy thereof
was sent to the second party for his Say. The second
party submitted his representation on 25-11-2002. The
disciplinary authority carefully evaluated the entire
proceedings of the inquiry, the oral and documentary
evidence and entire record and the submissions of the
second party and passed the order of dismissal. The
criminal proceeding pending before Additional Chief
Metropolitan Magistrate Court has no concern and it has
no effect on the findings of the inquiry officer. According
to the first party the second party was working in a Bank
who is custodian of public money and the employees
working in the Bank requires utmost honesty and integrity
as they are dealing with public money. The second party
was found guilty of a serious misconduct of theft.
Therefore he is not entitled to any leniency. The
punishment is thus proportionate to the misconduct.
Therefore first party prays that the reference deserves to
be dismissed with cost.
5. The second party workman filed his rejoinder at
Ex-8. He explained that, delay in raising the dispute was
caused as he raised the dispute after he was acquitted by
the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate. In spite of
that the first party refused to reinstate him. He also
reiterated that inquiry was not fair and proper and there
was violation of principles of natural justice etc.
6. Following are the preliminary issues for my
determination. record my findings thereon for the reasons
to follow:
Sr.
Issues
Findings
No.
1.
Whether the inquiry of workman Shri
Yes
Chandrakant G. Kawale held by the
first party management is fair and
proper?
2.
Whether the findings of the Inquiry
No.
Officer are perverse?
REASONS
Issue No.1 :—
7. In the case at hand according to the first party
after the preliminary inquiry, charge-sheet was served on
the second party workman for the alleged misconduct.
The second party has admitted the fact in his cross-
examination that he received the charge-sheet dated
22-09-2001. Copy thereof is on record at Ex-17. It is
contended in the written statement as well as in the affidavit
of IO at Ex-20 that copies of all the documents were given
to the second party. The said suggestion was put in the
cross examination of the second party workman at Ex-13.
He has not denied that copies of documents and list of
witnesses were supplied to him along with the charge
sheet. He vaguely replied that he does not understand
whether copies of documents and list of witnesses were
supplied to him. The fact is not disputed that Mr. Nikam
was defence representative of the second party and he
cross examined all the witnesses. The second party has
also admitted in his cross that inquiry papers pages 5 to
41 each page bears his signature. The Inquiry Officer has
stated in his affidavit at Ex-20 that defence representative
Mr. Nikam is a senior, experienced person well versed in
English and Marathi. He has also contended in his affidavit
that after examination of management witnesses he
permitted defence representative to produce his witnesses
and the defence representative told that he has no witness
and no document to submit. Second party also did not
examine himself but submitted a written brief. A specific
suggestion was put to the second party in his cross
examination at Ex-13. He has not denied that inquiry Officer
had given him opportunity to put his defence and examine
his witnesses. He has replied the question in the same
fashion that he does not understand the same. However
he admitted his signature on inquiry proceeding on that
date. It is at Ex-18.
8. It is the case of the first party that the copy of the
inquiry report was sent to the second party and his
submission was sought for. A specific suggestion to that
effect was given in the cross-examination of second party
at Ex-13 that he and his defence representative were
present before the Bank for personal hearing. He replied
that he does not remember it. However in the next sentence
he has admitted that after personal hearing he had,
preferred appeal to the management. He has also admitted
in his cross that the IO had sent him the copy of findings
of inquiry. In short, the charge sheet was served on the
second party. The second party was represented by a
defence representative Mr. Nikam. All the management
witnesses were examined in presence of the second party
workman and his defence representative. Fair and proper
opportunity was given to the defence representative to
cross examine them. Opportunity was also given to the
second party to examine himself and his witnesses.
4672
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
However second party did not examine himself or examine
any witnesses or produce any document. The report and
findings of IO were sent to the second party and after
giving him personal hearing the disciplinary authority
passed the order of dismissal.
9. In the circumstances Ld. Adv. for the first party
submitted that the lO has followed the procedure
prescribed for conducting the inquiry and fair and sufficient
opportunity was given to the second party workman. In
support of his argument the Ld. Adv. for first party resorted
to Apex Court ruling in Sur Enamel and Stamping Works
Ltd. V/s. Their Workmen1963 II LLJ 367 wherein the Hon'ble
Apex Court laid down the following conditions for fair
and proper disciplinary inquiry.
They are:
(1)
The employee proceeded against has been
informed clearly of the charges levelled against
him.
(2)
The witnesses are examined-ordinarily in the
presence of the employee in respect of the
charges.
(3)
The employee is given a fair opportunity to
cross examine witnesses.
(4)
He is given a fair opportunity to examine
witnesses including himself in his defence if he
so wishes on any relevant matter and
(5)
The inquiry officer records his findings with
reasons for the same in his report.
10. In the case at hand as per the guidelines of
Hon'ble Apex Court all the points referred hereinabove
were complied while conducting the inquiry. Furthermore
though the second party has contended in his statement
of claim and affidavit that there was violation of principles
of natural justice, it is not pointed out how there was
violation of principles of natural justice. On the other hand
after going through the inquiry proceeding and the
evidence on record, it is revealed that fair and proper
opportunity was given to the workman as contemplated
by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the above referred ruling.
Thus on this ground, fairness of inquiry cannot be
challenged.
11. The main objection raised on behalf of the second
party is that, when criminal case was pending before
Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Inquiry Officer
ought to have stayed the inquiry till decision of the criminal
case. It was further submitted on behalf of the second
party that, as workman is acquitted in the criminal case, he
deserves to be reinstated. In this respect I would like to
point out that, the law on the point is well settled. In
criminal cases charges are required to be proved beyond
reasonable doubt to hold the accused guilty. Whereas in
the departmental inquiry standard of proof is all together
different, mere preponderance of probability suffices the
purpose. Furthermore though in criminal case the Court
has acquitted the workman, there is no bar to proceed
with the departmental inquiry and Inquiry Officer can
record findings contrary thereto as criminal case and
departmental proceeding are based on different standard
of proof.
12. In this respect Apex Court ruling can be resorted
to in South Bengal State Transport Corporation V/s. Sapan
Kumar Mitra & Ors. 2006 I LLJ 1087 wherein on the point
Hon'ble Court observed that;
‘‘That being the position, an order of removal from
service emanating from a departmental proceeding
can very well be passed even after acquittal of the
delinquent employee in a criminal case. ”
Same view is reiterated by the Apex Court in Suresh
Pathrela V/s. Oriental Bank of Commerce 2007 2 SCT 715
wherein Apex Court
observed that;
‘‘It is well settled principle of law that the yardstick
and standard of proof in criminal case is different
from the disciplinary proceeding. While the standard
of proof in a criminal case is a proof beyond all
reasonable doubt, the proof in departmental
proceeding is preponderance of probability.”
13. In the circumstances, the Hon'ble Court in that
case held that, acquittal in criminal case would be no bar
for conducting a disciplinary proceeding against
delinquent officer. Even after acquittal the delinquent
workman can be removed from service if found guilty in
disciplinary proceeding. In this backdrop I hold that
criminal proceeding or even acquittal therein does not affect
the punishment awarded in the departmental inquiry. In
the circumstances I come to the conclusion that the inquiry
is fair and proper. Accordingly I decide this issue no.1 in
the affirmative.
Issue No.2:—
14. In respect of findings of the Inquiry Officer it is
contended in the statement of claim that they are perverse.
In this respect also it is not specifically pleaded how they
are perverse. On the other hand it was rightly pointed out
on behalf of the first party that, findings of the Inquiry
Officer are based on the evidence on record. There was
evidence of 13 witnesses and few documents before the
Inquiry Officer. Furthermore it has come on record that an
amount of Rs.6,00,000 was missing from the strong room.
It has come on record that the workman was in the strong
room for about 15 - 20 minutes and Mr. Kamath had handed
over second key to him.The workman had Aunauthorisedly
obtained the first key of the strong room. It has also come
on record that the workman has confessed that he has
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4673
taken away the amount and an amount of Rs.5,50,000 was
kept by him in a plastic bag at the door of the Bank. An
amount of Rs.45,000 was also recovered from his
residence. The findings of the Inquiry Officer are based
on the evidence of the witnesses examined by the
management. Though they were thoroughly cross-
examined by the defence representative nothing adverse
was revealed from their cross-examination. In the
circumstances the findings of the Inquiry Officer which
are based on the evidence on record and consistent thereto
thus the same cannot be called perverse. In this respect I
would also like to point out that, the Tribunal is not sitting
as an appellate court to scrutinize the findings which are
prima facie based on the evidence on record. On the point
Apex Court ruling can be resorted to in US State Road
Transport Corporation & Ors V/s. Musais Ram & Ors.
1999 (83) FLR 226 (SC) wherein on the point Hon'ble Court
observed that;
‘‘The Court does not sit in appeal over the findings
of the IO. If the findings are based on uncontroverted
material placed before the IO, it cannot be said that
these findings are perverse.”
15. In short the findings of the Inquiry Officer are
based on evidence before him. They are not contrary to
the evidence on record and cannot be called perverse.
Thus I hold that the findings of the IO are not perverse.
Accordingly I decide this issue no. 2 in the negative and
proceed to pass the following order:
ORDER
(i) The inquiry is held fair and proper.
(ii) Findings of the Inquiry Officer are not perverse.
(iii) The parties are directed to argue/lead evidence
on the point of quantum of punishment.
Date: 22-05-2013
K. B. KATAKE , Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 11 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1655-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ
MCY;w lh ,y ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa
ds chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj
vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV (la[;k
53@2007) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 11&07&2013
dks izkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y& 22012@303@2006&vkbZ vkj(lh,e&IIº
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 11th July, 2013
S.O. 1655.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 53/2007)
of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Jablpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial
dispute between the management of WCL, and their
workmen, received by the Central Government on
11-07-2013.
[ No. L-22012/303/2006-IR(CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
JABLPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/53/07
SHRI R. B. PATLE , Presiding Officer
The General Secretary,
SKMS (AITUC),
CRO Camp, Iklehra,
Distt Chhindwara (MP)
....Workman/Union
Versus
The Chief General Manager,
WCL, Pench Area,
PO Parasia,
Distt. Chhindwara
. . . Management
AWARD
Passed on this 20th day of June, 2013
1. As per letter dated 5-7-2007 by the Government
of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is
received. The reference is made to this Tnbunal under
Section-10 of ID. Act, 1947 as per Notification. No.
L-22012/303/2006-IR(CM-II). The dispute under reference
relates to :
“Whether the action of the management of WCL
in dismissing Shri Prabhu Dayal from services
w.e.f. 22-5-06 is legal and justified? If not, to what
relief is the workman entitled?”
2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to
the parties. However 1st party workman filed to appear the
file Statement of claim. 1st party workman is proceeded
exparte on 30-7-2011. The management submitted Written
Statement the case as submitted by management of IInd
party is that 1st party workman was working as PBX
Operator at Rawanwara Khas Colliery of ECL, Pench Area.
He was habitual absentee, his attendance was poor, warning
letters were issued to him, he did not show improvement in
4674
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
attendance. The workman was unauthorisely absent from
18-5-02 without intimation, permission or sanctioned leave.
The charge sheet was issued to him on 30-10-2002, no
reply was received. Vide order dated 30-3-05, the
Departmental enquiry was ordered against him. That after
issuing notice as no response was received, said witness
Mr. Shakir Ahmed Sr. Under Manager'was appointed as
Enquiry Officer, P.M. Lokhande, Under Manager was
appointed as Management Representative. That the
enquiry was conducted following principles of natural
justice. Opportunity for defence was given to the workman.
The delinquent employee did not appear after notice. The
enquiry was proceeded exparte as he remained absent. The
evidence of management's witness was recorded after
receiving Enquiry Report. That charges were proved, notice
was issued to delinquent employee. Any reply was not
received to the notice. Workman was dismissed for proved
misconduct.
3. Considering pleadings on record, the points which
arise for my consideration and determination are as under.
My findings are recorded against each of them for the
reasons as below :—
(i)
Whether the action of the
management of M/s WCL
In Affirmative
in dismissing Shri Prabhu
Dayal from services w.e.f.
22-5-06 is legal?
(ii) If so, to what relief the
Relief prayed
workman is entitled to?”
by workman are
rejected.
REASONS
4. As stated above, reference is made for adjudication
for legality of dismissal or the services of workman from
22-5-06. However the workman has failed to appear after
notice. He proceeded exparte. He has not adduced any
evidence. The management filed affidavit of its witness
Shri Y. Seshidhar. the witness has stated most of the facts
pleaded in Written Statement filed by management of IInd
party. That services of 1st party workman was dismissed
for is unauthorized. absence. DE was conducted. Workman
failed to participate in enquiry. The evidence of witqess of
management remained unchallenged. Workman failed to
appear in the proceeding therefore 1 find no reason to
disbelieve evidence of. management’s witness. The action
of the management therefore cannot be said illegal. For
above reasons, I record my finding in Affirmative.
In the result, I pass the following award:—
(1) The action of the management of WCL in
dismissing Shri Prabhu Dayal from services w.e.f.
22-5-06 is legal.
(2) Relief prayed by workman is rejected.
R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 11 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1656-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ
MCY;w lh ,y ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa
ds chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj
vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k
4@2008) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 11&07&2013
dks izkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y& 22012@306@2007&vkbZ vkj(lh,e&IIº
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 11th July, 2013
S.O.1656.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 4/2008) of
the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial
dispute between the management of WCL, and their
workmen, received by the Central Government on
11-07-2013.
[ No. L-22012/306/2007-IR(CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/4/2008
PRESENT : SHRI R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer
General Secretary,
Samyukta Koyla Mazdoor Sangh (ATUC),
CRC Camp, Iklehra,
Distt Chhindwara,
Chhindwara
. . .Workman/Union
Versus
The Chief General Manager,
WCL, Pench Area,
PO Parasia,
Distt. Chhindwara (MP)
. . .Management
AWARD
Passed on this 20th. day of June, 2013
1. As per letter dated 3-1-2008 by the Government
of India, Ministry of Labour, .New. Delhi, the reference is
received. The reference is made. to this Tnbunal under
Section -10 of LD. Act, 1947 as per Notification. No.
L-22012/306/2007-IR(CM-II). The dispute under reference
relates to :
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4675
“Whether the action of the management of M/S
WCL in \dismissing the services of Shri Lalit
Kumar w.e.f. 16-6-05 is legal and justified? If not,
to what relief is the workman entitled?”
2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to
the parties. The workman failed to appear after service of
notice. As per order dated 22-11-2012, 1st party workman is
proceeded exparte. Management filed Written Statement.
3. The case of IInd party management disclosed from
its Written Statement is that workman was terminated from
16-6,-05. The dispute is referred in 2010 which is a very
belated stage. The workman was habitual absentee. Despite
of warning letters, there was no improvement in his
attendance. Chargesheet was issued to him on 7- 12-2002.
The workman failed to reply even after service of
chargesheet. The DE was conducted by Pench Area
Manager G.K.Gupta. Mr. A. Dutta was the Management
Representative. The details of Enquiry proceedings and
dates of hearings are elaborately given in the Written
Statement. It is submitted that the enquiry was proceeded
exparte, principles of natural justice were followed. The
workman failed to participate in enquiry proceeding and
defend him. The services of workman were terminated as
per order dated 16-5-05, no appeal was filed by workman.
On such ground, it is submitted that the termination of
service, of 1st party workman is legal.
4. Considering pleadings on record, the points which
arise for my consideration and determination are as under.
My findings are recorded against each of them for the
reasons as below :—
(i)
Whether the action of the
management of M/s WCL
In Affirmative
in dismissing the Services
of Shri Lalit Kumar w.e.f.
16-6-05 is legal?
(ii) If so, to what relief the
Relief prayed
workman is entitled to?”
by workman is
rejected.
REASONS
5. The reference is made for adjudication for dismissal
of service of workman. However the workman has failed to
appear in the proceeding in spite of notice. He is proceeded
exparte as per order dated 22-11-2012. The management
has filed affidavit of witness Shri Padmakar Paunikar. The
witness of the management has stated in writing about the
unauthorized absence and Departmental Enquiry held
against workman, different notices issued and public notice
published is also expressed. The evidence of witness
remained unchallenged. The workman failed to participate
in the proceeding. I do not find reason to disbelieve the
unchallenged evidence of management's witness. There is
no evidence to hold that the action of management in
dismissing service of Shri Lalit Kumar w.e.f. 16-6-05 is legal.
Therefore I record Point No.1 in Affirmative.
6. In the result, award is passed as under:—
(l) The action of the management of M/S WCL in
dismissing the services of Shri Lalit Kumar w.e.f.
16-6-05 is legal:
(2) Relief prayed by workman is rejected.
R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 11 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1657-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ
MCY;w lh ,y ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa
ds chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj
vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k
19@1992) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 11&07&2013
dks izkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y& 22012@390@1991&vkbZ vkj(lh,e&IIº
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 11th July, 2013
S.O.1657.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 19/92)
of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial
dispute between the management of WCL, and their
workmen, received by the Central Government on
11-07-2013.
[ No. L-22012/390/1991-IR(CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/19/92
PRESENT : SHRI R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer
General Secretary,
S.K.M.S (AITUC), PO Chandametta,
Distt. Chhindwara.
. .Workman/Union
Versus
The Manager,
Chandametta Colliery,
PO Chandametta,
Distt. Chhindwara
. . . Management
4676
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
AWARD
Passed on this 19th day of June, 2013
1. As per letter dated 9-1-92 by the Government of
India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is
received. The reference is made. to this Tribunal under
Section -10 of LD. Act, 1947 as per Notification. No. L-
22012/390/91-IR(C-II). The dispute under reference relates
to :
“Whether the action of the management i.e.
Manager, Chandametta Colliery of WCL, Pench
Area, PO Chandametta, Distt. Chhindwara (MP)
to stop from work to Smt. Bhagwati Bai D/o Gindu,
Ex-Wagon Loader of Chandametta: Colliery w.e.f.
6-1-1974 is proper and justified? If not, to what
relief are the said workman is entitled to?”
2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to
the parties. 1st party workman submitted her statement of
claim at Page 4/1 to 4/4. The case of 1st party workman is
that Bhagwati Bai, D/o Gindu was working as Wagon
Loader since seven years. On 7-12-71, she suffered injuries
while loading the wagon. Her both hands cut injuries. Her
right hand was amputed. Three fingers of left hand were
cut. That she was receiving treatment in Burkui Hospital.
She was discharge from said Hospital on 13-1-1972. That
injury certificate was issue from Hospital on 18-12-1972.
From 6-1-74, she had went Parmanand Hospital, Chhindwara
for fitting artificial hands. She was receiving treatment in
said Hospital from 24-6-74 to 30-6-75 Thereafter workman
was sent back to colliery. That she again received treatment
for fitting artificial hands during the period 7-4-75 to
11-4-75 even after artificial hands were fitted, she was
provided employment by the IInd party. She was asked to
produce disability certificate. Thereafter she submitted
disability certificate. She was no provided work.
3. The workman further submits that she had narrated
her grievance to Central Minister Mr. Kamalnath. He also
gave instruction to Branch Manager but workman was not
provided work. It is submitted that workman has become
unconscious while loading wagon. She fell on regulator
and her both hands were amputed. She received treatment
in WCL hospital as well as rehabilitation centre,
Chhindwara. She was not provided work. That the workman
is holding P.F.A/C No. A/4/8/1434. She claims compensation
of Rs. 20 Lakhs as IInd party failed to provide work to her.
4. IInd party filed Written Statement at Page 6/1 to
6/3. IInd party denied that workman was working m Its
mine. It is denied that she was stopped from work from
6-1-74. That the reference is highly belated as the dispute
is referred in 1992, therefore the reference is not tenable.
That as per provisions of Coal Mines Nationalisation Act,
the liability of WCL is only with regard to such employees
who are in the rolls of the private owners on the appointed
date i.e. 30-1-72. According to records on 30-1-73, Smt.
Bhagwati Bai was not on the rolls of Chandametta Colliery.
The reference speaks about stopping Smt. Bhagwati Bai
w.e.f. 6-1-74 . is incorrect. The reference is liable to be
rejected as her name is not appearing in the Form B Register.
On said ground, IInd party prays for rejection of claim of
the workman.
5. Workman filed rejoinder at Page 7/1 to 7/2
reiterating her earlier pleadings. Management submitted
rejoinder at Page 8/1 to 8/5 denying that the workman was
its employee, that name of workman was not appearing in
the rolls. Rest of all contentions of workman are denied by
the management.
6. Considering pleadings on record, the points which
arise for my consideration and determination are as, under.
My findings are recorded against each of them for the
reasons as below :—
i)
Whether the action of the
management i.e. Manager,
In Affirmative
Chandametta Colliery of
WCL, Pench Area, PO Chandametta
Dist. Chhindwara (MP) to stop
from work to Smt. Bhagwati
Bai D/o Gindu, Ex-Wagon
Loader of Chandametta
Colliery w.e.f. 6-1-1974
is legal?
(ii) If so, to what relief the
Relief prayed
workman is entitled to?”
by workman is
rejected.
REASONS
7. In order to substantiate her claim, the workman
has filed affidavit of her evidence. She has stated in her
evidence that she was working as Wagon Loader from
7-12-1971. She had lost her senses while loading wagon
and fell on regulator and both hands were amputed. She
received treatment in Hospital of Burkui Mines, Injury
Certificate was issued to her, she also received treatment in
Parmanand Hospital, Chhindwara. She. was admitted for
fitting artificial hands at Parmanand Hospital. That she was
not provided work despite of repeated request. In her cross-
examination, workman says she was doing work of wagon
loader from 4 years prior to December 1971. She had received
Token No., Identity Card, Coal Card, letter of appointment.
That accident slip was prepared. The said document was
submitted in hospital. Her hand was amputed in the
incident. She did not recollect her number. That about 200
labours were working as Wagon Loader. She has suffered
injury prior to nationalization of Mine in 1973. All 200
labours were absorbed in Coal Mines except her. That after
she was discharged from hospital, she has gone to Mine
office, she was kept sitting in office. She claims ignorance
whether after nationalization, list of employees of Private
owner was submitted. She also claims to be member of
INTUC Union. That her present age is about 60-62 years.
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4677
The evidence of workman is not supported by any
documents. The zerox copies of documents produced by
workman about her treatment in hospital and reports, no
witness is examined by workman to prove those documents.
Therefore those documents cannot be considered as legal
evidence.
8. The evidence of management's witness is by nature
of denial. Workman was working in IInd party Coal Mines,
The witness of the management has stated that name of
workman was not appearing in the list of employees received
from Private Employer. The witness of the management
Rajesh Sharma is not shattered in his cross-examination.
Contrary suggestion are denied by witness of the
management.
9. Learned counsel for IInd party Mr. Shashi submits
that the dispute is referred after 18 years highly belated is
not tenable. In support of his argument, learned counsel
relies in ratio held in case of —
“Assistant Executive Engineer, Karnataka Versus
Shivalinga reported in 2002-I-LLJ-457. Their
Lordship of the Apex Court dealing with delay
and latches held delay of more than 9 years in
approaching the Labour Officer was talked in
case.”
In case of Indian Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. Versus Prahlad
Singh reported in 2001-I-Supreme court Cases 424, Their
Lordship held Industrial Dispute raised after 13 long years
of termination of services as no reasonable explanation is
given for such delay, the Industrial Tribunal rightly refused
to grant any relief. .
In case of Nedungadi bank Ltd. versus
K.P.Madhavankutty reported in AIR-2000-SC-839 . Their
Lordship held the power of Government to make reference-
no time limit prescribed doesnot mean that power can be
exercised any point of time, still dispute cannot be referred.
In present case, no record is produced by workman
about her employment in Private Employer neither she has
produced legal evidence about her employment in WCL-
the IInd party after her discharge from hospital. As per her
evidence, her both hands were amputed, artificial hands
were fitter, she was not provided employment, no
documents are produced that her name was appearing in
the list of workman received from Private Employer. Her
name was not appearing in Form B Register. The workman
was stopped from work in 1974 and the dispute is referred
in 1992 after almost 18 years. No documents can be
preserved for such long time. Considering no evidence on
record, long delay in making reference, it is clear that the
claim of Ist party is not supported by satisfactory evidence.
Therefore action of management cannot be said illegal. For
above reasons, I record my finding in Point No.1 in
Affirmative.
10. In the result, award is passed as under :—
(1)
The action of the management i.e. Manager,
Chandametta Colliery of WCL, Pench Area, PO
Chandametta, Distt Chhindwara (MP) to stop from
work to Smt. Bhagwati Bai D/o Gindu, Ex-Wagon
Loader of Chandametta Colliery w.e.f. 6-1-1974 is
legal.
(2)
Relief prayed by workman is rejected.
R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 11 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1658-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ
bZ lh ,y ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds
chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vlulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k
21@2012) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 11&07&2013
dks izkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y& 22012@31@2012&vkbZ vkj(lh,e&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 11th July, 2013
S.O. 1658.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 21/2012)
of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial
dispute between the management of J. K. Nagar Colliery,
M/s. E.C. Ltd., and their workmen, received by the Central
Government on 11-07-2013.
[ No. L-22012/31/2012-IR(CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
ASANSOL
PRESENT : SHRI JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding
Officer
REFERENCE NO. 21 of 2012
PARTIES : The management of J.K. Nagar Colliery, M/s.
ECL, Burdwan(WB)
Vs.
The Sri D.K. ROUTH, BRANCH Jt. Secy., CMC(HMS),
Aradanga, Asansol, (W.B.)
4678
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
REPRESENTATIVES :
For the management :
Sri P.K. Das, Ld. Advocate
For the union (Workman) :
Sri D.K. Routh, Ld.
Representative
INDUSTRY : Coal
STATE: West Bengal
Dated - 16-04-13
AWARD
In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-
section(1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947), Govt. of India
through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L-22012/
31/2012-I.R.(CM-II) dated 19.04.12 has been pleased to refer
the following dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal.
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of J. K.
Nagar Colliery of M/s. ECL in not payment HRA
@ 10% of Basic Pay to Sri Taran Chandra Paul
while he was posted at J. K. Nagar, Raniganj is fair
and justified? To what relief the concerned
workman is entitled to ?”
Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/31/
2012-I.R. (CM-II) dated 19.04.12 of the above said reference
from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for
adjudication of the dispute, a reference case No. 21 of 2012
was registered on 08-05-12 and accordingly an order to
that effect was passed to issue notices through the
registered post to the parties concerned directing them to
appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their written
statements along with the relevant documents and a list of
witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance of the
said order notices by the registered post were sent to the
parties concerned.
On perusal of the case record, it has been found that
Sri D.K. Routh, Branch Jt. Secretary of the Union, has
prayed for the closure of the case as the workman is not
interested to proceed with the case. Since "the workman is
not interested to proceed with the case, the case is closed
and accordingly an order of "No Dispute Award" is hereby
passed.
ORDER
Let an “Award” be and the same is passed as “No
Dispute” existing. Send the copies of the order to the Govt.
of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for information and
needful. The reference is accordingly disposed of.
JAY ANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 11 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1659-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj jhtuy
eSustj] lSUVªjy os;jgkm¯lx dkjiksjs'ku] Hkksiky ds izca/ra=k ds
lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V
vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k tcyiqj
ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k lh-th-vkbZ-Vh-@,y-lh-@vkj-@101@2000)
dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 28&06&2013 dks
izkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y& 42011@02@2000&vkbZ vkj(Mh;w)º
lkse ukFk] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 11th July, 2013
S.O.1659.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGIT/
LC/R/101/2000) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the
Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers
in relation to the management of the Regional Manager,
Central Warehousing Corporation, Bhopal and their
workman which was received by the Central Government
on 28-06-2013.
[ No. L-42011/02/2000-IR(DU)]
SOM NATH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
JABLPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/101/2000
SHRI R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer
General Secretary,
Central Warehousing Corporation Employees Union,
C/o Central Ware housing Corporation,
52-53, Amar Niwas,
Bhopal (MP)
.....Workman/Union
Versus
Personnel Manager,
Central Warehousing Corporation,
4/1, Siri Institutional Area,
Hauz Khas,
New Delhi.
Regional Manager,
Central Warehousing Corporation,
Regional Office,
52-53, Amar Niwas,
Bhopal (MP)
....Managements
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4679
AWARD
Passed on this 20th day of March 2013
1. As per letter dated 2-6-2000 by the Government of
India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is
received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under
Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.L-42011/
2/2000/IR(M). The dispute under reference relates to:
“Whether the action of the management of Central
Warehousing Corporation in transferring and
relieving Shri G.S.Gupta, Shri Mansingh, Shri Indal
Singh and Shri Sureshchand from their respective
places by way of using colourable exercise of
power and unfair labour practice is justified? If
not, to what relief the workmen are entitled?”
2. After receipt of reference and notices issued to the
parties, the Union filed statement of claim at Page
2/1 to 2/6. The contention of the Union is that there is no
transfer policy in establishment of Central Ware Housing
Corporation. The IInd party management is using transfer
as tool to victimize the members of this Trade Union. That
the IInd party is empowered to transfer Class-IV staff but
such power cannot be used to favour one set of workers. It
is alleged that IInd party has shown favour to members of
unrecognized Union and members of 1st party Union are
encouraged to join membership of unrecognized Union.
That staff from Khandwa and other sector is transferred
without providing substitute. The orders are cancelled or
kept in abeyance to create vacancies at Khandwa. That
IInd party contravened provisions of I.D.Act, committed
unfair labour practice in Schedule IV by encouraging
members of Trade Union discriminating the workman. The
transfer is malafide. That Ilnd party issued instructions to
Ware House Manager, Satna to relieve Shri Suresh Chandra.
That Shri Jagmohan is still enjoying stay who is member of
the unrecognized Union. The grievances was submitted
before ALC(C), Bhopal IInd party arranged to relieve Iqbal
Ali for Khandwa. He has not joined. It is alleged that Shri
Mansingh from Gwalior, Shri Vijay Kumar from Morena,
Shri D. K. Shukla from Morena, Shri Home Singh from Indore,
Shri O. P. Singh from Indore, Shri Bharat Singh, Morena
and Shri Nepal Singh, Morena are transferred. Their transfer
is stayed or cancelled to favour of unrecognized Union.
The transfer order are issued by way of victimazation.
Union prayed for setting aside the same.
3. IInd party/management filed Written Statement
denying allegations of 1st party/workman, That the
Corporation has its own recruitment rules and service
conditions duly approved by the Government and notified
in the Gazette of India. The services of the employees are
governed under these regulations called CWC Staff
Regulations 1986. The corporation has 17 Regional offices
all over the country and Bhopal region is one of them which
is running 38 units in different parts of MP and Chhattisgarh
State. That Bhopal Region has a biggest Warehouse. That
warehouse Khandwa has a capacity of 90,000 MT. FCI is
major depositor at Khandwa. That prior to posting of three
employees namely Shri G.S.Gupta, Mansingh, and Suresh
Chandra, there were only 3 JTAs against sanctioned
strength of 16 JTAs for the preservation of the food grain
at Central Warehouse Khandwa. That the pesticide
treatment and fumigation work cannot be carried out to
preserve heavy stock of foodgrain. Keeping in view the
pressing need of technical staff at CWC, Khandwa the
management issued transfer order leading to the dispute
by Union. It is submitted that the transfer orders of those
persons have been issued without malafide intention. The
allegations are denied. The detailed reasons in respect of
transfer of Shri Shri G.S.Gupta, Shri Mansingh, Shri Indal
Singh and Shri Sureshchand are given. It is denied that
members of the unrecognized Union are shown favour and
for encouraging its membership, the transfer orders are
issued by way of victimization. IInd party/management
prays for rejection of claim of 1st party.
4. Considering pleadings on record, the points which
arise for my consideration and determination are as under.
My findings are recorded against each of them for the
reasons as below :—
(i)
Whether the management
of Central Warehousing
In Negative
Corporation in transferring
and relieving Shri G. S. Gupta,
Shri Mansingh, Shri Indal
Singh and Shri Sureshchand
from their respective places
by way of using colourable
exercise of power and unfair
labour practice is justified?
(ii) If not, what relief the work-
Claim of 1st Party
man is entitled to ?”
is rejected.
5. Ist party/Union challenging order of transfer of 4
of its members Shri G.S.Gupta, Shri Mansingh, Shri Indal
Singh and Shri Sureshchand alleging that the transfer orders
are issued to victimize members of the Union with malafide
intention. It is alleged that orders are issued to encourage
membership of unrecognized Union. That transfer is not
condition of service. IInd party is contending that the
transfer orders are issued considering need of the trained
staff for protection of stocks at CWC, Khandra. Union has
failed to adduce evidence. Union is proceeded exparte on
6-4-2011. The management filed affidavit of witness 8hri
Mritunjoy Kumar Verma covering all its contentions that
the transfer orders are issued considering the requirement
of staff.
6. The allegations of Union that transfer orders are
issued with malafide intention or by way of victimization in
colourable exercise of powers are not supported by any
4680
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
evidence. Therefore allegation of Union cannot be
accepted. For above reasons, I record my finding on Point
No.1 in Negative.
7. In the result, award is passed as under:—
“(1) The transfer order of Shri G.S.Gupta, Shri
Mansingh, Shri Indal Singh and Shri Sureshchand
issued by management of Central Ware Housing
Corporation is legal.
(2) Relief prayed by 1st party/Union is rejected.”
R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 11 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1660-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj fMoh”kuy
jsyos eSustj] foykliqj ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds
deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k tcyiqj
ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k lh-th-vkbZ-Vh-@,y-lh-@vkj-@139@93) dks
izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 28&06&2013 dks izkIr
gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y& 41012@54@1992&vkbZ vkj(Mh;wº
lkse ukFk] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 11th July, 2013
S.O. 1660.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGIT/
LC/R/139/93) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-
cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in
the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to
the management of The Divisional Railway Manager,
Bilaspur and their workman which was received by the
Central Government on 28-06-2013.
[ No. L-41012/54/1992-IR(DU)]
SOM NATH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
JABLPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/139/93
SHRI R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer
Shri Kailash Rao,
S/o Late Mukund,
Railway Colony,
Bhilai-3, Distt. Durg
. . .Workman
Versus
Divisional Railway Manager,
South Eastern Railway,
Bilaspur
. . . Management
AWARD
Passed on this 2nd day of May, 2013
1. As per letter dated 21-1-93 by the Government of
India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is
received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under
Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification
No. L-41012/54/92-IR(DU). The dispute under reference
relates to:
“Whether the action of the management of South
Eastern Railway, Bilaspur Division in terminating
the
services
of
Shri
Kailash
Rao,
s/o Late Mukunda Gangman, w.e.f. 29-9-90 is
justified? If not, what relief is the workman is
entitled to?”
2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to
the parties. 1st, party workman submitted his statement of
claim at page 3/1 to 3/6 of record. The case of 1st party
workman is that he was appointed on 24-2-90 as Gangman
as per appointment letter dated 31-2-90. Howeveer without
giving any order in writing, his services were orally
terminated w.e.f. 29-9-90. He submits that he was continued
in service without break, without assigning any reason,
was prevented from doing duties. That he was going to the
office of the IInd party. That he was orally prohibited from
duty. That there can be no oral tennination order. That in
absence of order of termination in writing, it is deemed to
be in service. That orally he was informed that his services
were terminated for using incorrect casual cards. According
to him, casual cards are not precedent for employment and
that could not be a reason for terminating his services.
That he was not allowed reasonable opportunity. To explain
his case, he has referred to case held in AIR 1978-SC-597—
Maneka Gandhi Versus Union of India., He. has also quoted
ratio held in case of Divisional Suptd., Central Railway,
Jabalpur in 1969 (1) LLJ- 705. He reiterated that oral
termination without giving opportunity of hearing is illegal.
The termination of his service amounts to retrenchment of
I.D. Act. The Railways are employing many persons without
giving chance to him. That he was working in regular post,
vacancies are still existing. Hundreds of persons similarly
situated are retrenched in service. Only some persons are
removed on ground of submitting false card. Their
termination is unjust, unfair and violative of article 14 of
the Costitution. That he had completed 120 days service
and attained temporary status as provided in Indian Railway
Establishment Manual. He is entitled to certain rights as in
Para 2.5.11 of Railway Establishment Manual. It is submitted
that the services of workman cannot be terminated on
charges of obtaining employment producing false
document without following procedure in the department
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4681
rules. He submits that his termination from service is
violative of natural justice and mandatory provisions of
law. He also submits that his services are terminated in
violation of Section 25-F of I.D. Act. He was not served
with notice. No retrenchment compensation was paid. That
in several other cases filed before CAT at
Jabalpur the orders were passed holding the termination
order illegal. Workman prays similar relief of reinstatement
with back wages with regularization of service.
3. IInd party filed Written Statement at Page 6/1 to
6/7. It is case of Ilnd party that 1st party was engaged as
casual Gangman from 14-2-90 subject to conditions that if
the documents produced by him are found false at any
time during their engagement, their service would be
terminated automatically without any notice. The service
certificate produced by him was found bogus. His services
is terminated from 25-9-90 as per conditions in the deptt.
rules and services. 150 candidates were terminated
including the 1st party workman.
4. It is submitted that 1st party workman was not
holding civil post under Union of India nor he held any
civil post earlier. The case of the applicant was of forgery
with the Railway Administration. He was not an employee,
he is not entitled to protection under I.D. Act, 1947. It is
reiterated that 1st party workman was engaged as casual
gangman on daily rate of pay. He was posted under the
CPWI Abhanpur on 24-2-90. The workman was engaged
subject to the condition laid down in the appointment letter.
As the service certificate is found false after verification,
his services are terminated from 25-9-90. The above facts
are the repeated in the Written Statement. The certificate of
service produced by employees found genuine after
verification of service. That out of 861 casual candidates,
services of 150 casual candidates were terminated as the
certificate produced by them were found false after
verification. Other contentions of 1st party workman are
denied. It is denied that 1st party workman is entitled to
reinstatement. That workman had not completed 240 days
continuous service. IInd party prayed for rejection of the
relief prayed by 1st party workman.
5. Ist party workman filed rejoinder at page 7/1 to 7/2.
It is not correct that the workman was not employed only
on the basis of the past service card. There is no rule or
regulation in Railway requiring production of casual labour
card for the purpose of appointment. Workman was not
aware of the said documents. He denies that he had
submitted false and fabricated document of service card. It
is denied that his claim is not permissible under I.D. Act. It
is submitted that he had not obtained appointment by
producing false card. That the termination on the allegation
of producing false service card casting stigma and therefore
Departmental Enquiry is necessary. He further submits that
principles of natural justice was violated and terminated
his services.
6. Though termination in reference show from
29-9-90, as per pleadings termination is from 25-9-90.
Considering pleadings on record, the points which arise
for my consideration and determination are as under. My
findings are recorded against each of them for the reasons
as below:—
(i) Whether the action of the
In Affirmative
management of South Eastern
Railway, Bilaspur Division in
terminating the services of Shri
Kailash Rao, s/o Late Mukunda
Gangman, w.e.f.
25-9-90 is
justified?
(ii) If so, to what relief the
Ist party workman
workman is entitled to?"
is not entitled to
relief prayed by him.
REASONS
7. Ist party workman is challenging his termination
w.e.f. 29-9-90 for the allegations being produced false
service certificate/casual labour card. It is contented by
him that he was not given any opportunity before
terminating the services nor enquiry was held, no notice
was issued, principles of natural justice violated, action of
management is violative of Article 20 of the Constitution of
India. All those contentions are denied by IInd party.
However IInd party has not disputed that 1st party workman
was engaged as casual labour from 14-2-90 and his services
were terminated from 25-9-90. The workman had worked
for about 7 months 11 days. Workman filed affidavit of
evidence covering his contentions in Statement of claim.
The date of his appointment and termination shows that
he has completed 120 days service, he had attained status
of temporary employee as per statutory provisions
contained in Indian Railway Establishment Manual- Para
2511. In his affidavit of evidence, he has stated that he has
never submitted casual card for getting employment as
casual labour. That there is no rule or regulation in Railway
which require casual labour card for getting appointment.
He has stated that similar cases were filed before CAT,
Jabalpur. It was held that the service of casual employee
was terminated on the ground that he had obtained
employment by producing false card without holding
enquiry. In his evidence in cross-examination, Ist party
workman says that in para-4 of the affidavit of evidence
contents relates to casual labour card and not require for
purpose of employment, no questions are asked with respect
to other averments of 1st party workman. However the
copy of appointment order Exhibit M-1 finds clear condition
that the working certificate/caste certificate/service
certificate if found false at any time during their engagement
the service will be terminated automatically without any
notice. Para in bottom of Exhibit M-1 finds clear reference
4682
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
to past service certificate/service certificates. The said
appointment order was issued on 14-2-90 as stated by 1st
party in his statement of claim and affidavit of evidence, it
is clear that if the casual labour card found service, the
services are liable to be terminated without notice. The
documents Exhibit M-2 is the order of termination dated
25-9-90 refers to the discharge of 1st party workman. The
reason shown against his name is "produced false
certificate”.
8. The evidence of management's witness Shri R.S.
Bepari on affidavit has stated that the false casual gangmen
after bifurcation from Bilaspur Division, all cases of Raipur
Division related to false cases of gangmen were transferred
to Raipur. Similar cases were filed before CAT, Jabalpur
and the matters were taken before Hon'ble High Court,
Chhattisgarh. Which were remitted back by to CAT, Jabalpur
and are pending. That appointment were made with the
condition that if the certificate submitted by them were
false, their services will be automatically terminated. The
files and documents were stolen from the chamber of
Administrative Officer, Shri Bhasker Rao by breaking the
lock of the Almirah. FIR was filed by the management. In
his cross-examination, the management's witness says that
he was not working when the employee were discharged.
The engagement letter were given as casual gangman. The
fake certificate were stolen from the office of the Railway.
He was unable to tell from which place those certificates
were issued. For security of record, no guard was posted.
Deliberation was made and certificates were found fake.
He was unable to tell the name of the Verifying Officer.
That he had seen verification report and report on its basis.
In view of the verification report, documents were found
fake. In case of casual employee, it is not necessary to hold
departmental enquiry.
9. Learned counsel for 1st party workman Mr. Shashi
heavily emphasized that the employee was not given
opportunity of hearing. That even 240 days service is not
completed. The dispute is tenable. That the services of 1st
party workman are terminated on the ground that he
submitted false certificate casting stigma, no enquiry was
held, no opportunity of hearing was given and therefore
the allegation of cheating, forgery were made. Therefore
the termination of service is illegal. In reply, learned counsel
for Ilnd party management supports the order of
termination. That 1st party workman has not completed
240 days, he is not holding civil post. Ist party workman is
not entitled to protection of article 311 of the constitution
of India. That his services are not governed by CCS Rules
and prays for rejection of relief prayed by Ist party
workman.
10. Learned counsel for 1st party Mr. Shashi relies
on—
Ratio held in the case of Nepal Singh Versus State
of U.P reported in AIR 1990 Supreme Court 1459.
Their Lordship of the Apex Court held an order
terminating the services of a temporary
Government servant and ex facie innocuous in
that it does not cast any stigma on the Government
Servant or visits him with penal consequences
must be regarded as effecting a termination
simpliciter, but it is discovered on the basis of
material adduced that although innocent in its
terms the order was passed infact with a view to
punishing the Government servant, it is a punitive
order which can be passed only after complying
with Article 311.
From reading para-2 of the judgment, it is clear that case
before their Lordship was relating to temporary Sub
Inspector of Police posted at Shajapur. 1st party workman
is not holding any civil post, he was not regular employee
of the Railway. Therefore Article 311 is not applicable in
the present case.
From reading of Article 311, it is clear that the said article
only extends protection to the person who is member of
Civil Service of Union and All India Service or Civil Service
of State or holds a civil post under Union of a State.
Therefore the ratio in above cited case cannot be applied
to the case at my hand.
11. Next reliance is placed by Mr. Shashi in ratio held
in case of—
Shri Anoop Jaiswal versus Government of India
and Another reported in 1984(2) Supreme Court
Cases 369. Their Lordship held order punitive in
nature which in absence of any proper enquiry
amounted to violation of Article 311 (2) of the
Constitution, hence the order is liable to be set
aside to be reinstated in service with full benefits.
The case before their Lordship relate to
appointment of probationer as IPS Officer. Delay
was alleged on his part for P.T/unarmed combat
practice.
'The workman was engaged as casual labour hardly worked
for about 7 months, was not holding any civil post therefore
the ratio in above cited case cannot be applied to the
present case at hand.
In case of Bhagwan Singh Rawat versus State of
MP and Others reported in 2003(4) M.P.H.T. 309,
the allegation against petitioner is of making
demand of illegal gratification. Removal from the
post of Agriculture Member. It was held by his
Lordship that until unless petitioner is found guilty
of demanding illegal gratification and charge is
established petitioner could not be fastened with
the penalty of removal.
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4683
As the workman is not holding any civil post neither he is
regular employee of the Railway, the ratio held in the case
cannot be applied to the present case at hand.
Reliance is placed on ratio held in case of Radha
Mohan Goswami and others versus State of
Madhya Pradesh and others reported in 2004(2)
M.P.H.T. 49. His Lordship considering the
petitioners were appointed on daily wage basis,
the same persons were appointed on daily wage.
In compliance of these orders they joined their
posts. Suddenly order of regularization in favour
of employees cancelled on 10-6-2003. Against this
cancellation, his Lordship held right accrued to
petitioners when the order was passed on
3-6-2003. An administrative order having adverse
effect on accrued right of employee without giving
him opportunity of hearing is unsustainable.
Hence order dated 10-6-2003 cancelling order of
regularization dated 3-6-03 was quashed.
In present case, 1st party workman was never regularized.
The facts of above cited case are not comparable. The
facts of the above said case cannot be beneficially applied
to the case at hand.
12. Counsel for IInd party Shri Tripathi has produced
copy of Indian Railway Establishment—
Para 2001 Clause I(b) provides that casual labours
are also engaged on Railways for execution of
Railway projects, such as new lines, doubling,
conversion, construction of buildings, track
renewals, route relay interlocking Railway
electrification, Setting up of new units etc. Casual
Labour so engaged are referred to as project
Casual Labour. Such of those casual labour
engaged on open line (revenue) works, who
continue to do the same work for which they were
engaged or other work of the same type for more
than 120 days without a break will be treated a
temporary on completion of 120 days continuous
employment.
However Para-2004 of the said manual provides
that notice is necessary under any statutory
obligation, no notice is required for termination
of service of casual labour.
Condition in Exhibit M-l shows that if the service certificate
produced by such gangman found false after verification.
The services are liable to be terminated without notice. 1st
party workman accepted the said appointment order and
joined the service therefore said condition No.1 is binding
on him. He cannot be permitted to claim contrary to the
said condition. That the copies of judgment in several matter
by Hon'ble CAT, Ahmadabad and Jabalpur are produced
on record but the judgment in R/191/91 by CGIT, Jabalpur,
the facts are not comparable and the jurisdiction of CAT is
wide whereas the jurisdiction of this Tribunal is limited to
decide the reference under I.D. Act. Therefore the judgments
delivered by CAT in different cases are not binding.
13. Rule 3(1) of CCS Rules clearly provides that those
rules are not applicable to the Railway servant.
14. The legal position with respect to the jurisdiction,
powers of Central Administrative Tribunal together
provided in Section 14 of the Administrative Tribunal's
Act, 1985 is clear that the casual labours acquiring
temporary status does not become a temporary Railway
Servant or a member of Railway Service Card holder under
Railway. Section 14 (1)(A) is not attracted to the
consideration of the Tribunal.
15. Learned counsel for 1st party Mr. Shashi during
further course of argument submitted that 1st party
workman is covered under Sectin 2(s) of I.D. Act. The
establishment of IInd party is covered as Industry under
Section 2(j) of the I.D. Act. That the dispute defined under
Section 2(k) covers difference between employees employer
between employers and workman etc. The appropriate
Government is Central Government, reference is made. The
reference is tenable. The services were terminated without
notice or giving opportunity of hearing. Therefore the
termination of service of 1st party workman is illegal.
Chapter V-A of I.D. Act dealing with retrenchment under
Section 25-B of I.D. Act provides continuous service within
meaning of clause (1) for a period of one year if the employee
worked for 240 days during preceding 12 calendar months.
1st party workman has not completed 240 days continuous
service therefore he is not covered as workman under
Section 25(B) of I.D. Act. For said reason, 1st party
workman is not entitled to protection under Section 25-F
clause (a), (b) of I.D. Act. He is not entitled to notice prior
to his termination or retrenchment compensation provided
under clause (b)b of Section 25-F. That when service
certificate produced by him is found false, no notice is
required as per the condition in Exhibit M-l. For above
reasons, I record finding on Point No.1 in Affirmative.
16. Point No.2— In view of my finding in Point No.1
that the termination of services of 1st party workman is
legal, the workman is not entitled to any relief prayed by
him. Accordingly I record in my finding on point No. 2.
17. In the result, award is passed as under :—
(1) Termination of 1st party workman Shri Kailash
Rao w.e.f. 29-9-90 by IInd party management is
legal.
(2) Reliefs prayed by 1st party workman Shri Kailash
Rao is rejected.
R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer
4684
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ubZ fnYyh] 11 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1661-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj fMfotuy
jsyos eSustj] fcykliqj ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds
deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh;
ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV
(lanHkZ la[;k lhthvkbZVh@,ylh@vkj@154@96) dks çdkf'kr
djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 28&6&2013 dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹iQk- la- ,y&41012@24@1992&vkbZ vkj (Mh;w)º
lkse ukFk] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 11th July, 2013
S.O. 1661.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Diputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT/
LC/R/154/96) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the
Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers
in relation to the management of The Divisonal Railway
Manager, Bilaspur and their workman which was received
by the Central Government on 28-6-2013.
[ F. No. L-41012/24/1992-IR(DU)]
SOM NATH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT,
JABALPUR
No. CGIT/LC/R/154/96
SHRI R.B. P ATLE : Presiding Officer
Shri P.Venkatswamy,
Cut Cabin, Rameshwar Nagar,
Bhanpuri,
PO WRS, Raipur .......Workman
Versus
Divisional Railway Manager,
South Eastern Railway,
Bilaspur .......Management
AWARD
Passed on this 2nd day of May 2013
1. As per letter dated 6-8-96 by the Government of
India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is
received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under
Section-10 of I.D. Act, 1947 as per Notification No.
L-41012/24/92-IR(DU). The dispute under reference
relates to :
“Whether the action of the management of DRM,
S. E. Railway, Bilaspur in terminating the services
of Shri P.Venkatswamy is legal and justified? If
not, to what relief is the workman entitled?”
2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to
the parties. Ist party workman submitted his statement
of claim at page 2/1 to 2/4 of record. The case of Ist
party workman is that he was appointed on 15- 2-90 as
Gangman as per appointment letter dated 15-2-90.
However without giving any order in writing, his services
were orally terminated w.e.f. 19-4-90. He submits that he
was continued in service without break, without
assigning any reason, was prevented from doing duties.
That he was going to the office of the IInd Party. That
he was orally prohibited from duty. That there can be no
oral termination order. That in absence of order of
termination in writing, it is deemed to be in service. That
orally he was informed that his services were terminated
for using incorrect casual cards. According to him, casual
cards are not precedent for employment and that could
not be a reason for terminating his services. That he was
not allowed reasonable opportunity. To explain his case,
he has referred to case held in AIR 1978-SC-597 - Maneka
Gandhi Versus Union of India. He has also quoted ratio
held in case of Divisional Suptd., Central Railway,
Jabalpur in 1969 (1) LLJ-705. He reiterated that oral
termination without giving opportunity of hearing is
illegal. The termination of his service amounts to
retrenchment of I.D.Act. The Railways are employing
many persons without giving chance to him. That he
was working in regular post, vacancies are still existing.
Hundreds of persons similarly situated are retrenched in
service. Only some persons are removed on ground of
submitting false card. Their termination is unjust, unfair
and violative of article 14 of the Constitution. That he
had completed 120 days service and attained temporary
status as provided in Indian Railway Establishment
Manual. He is entitled to certain rights as in Para 2-5-
11 of Railway Establishment Manual . It is submitted
that the services of workman cannot be terminated on
charges of obtaining employment producing false
document without following procedure in the department
rules. He submits that his termination from service is
violative of natural justice and mandatory provisions of
law. He also submits that his services are terminated in
violation of Section 25-F of I.D. Act. He was not served
with notice. No retrenchment compensation was paid.
That in several other cases filed before CAT at Jabalpur
the orders were passed holding the termination order
illegal. Workman prays similar relief of reinstatement with
back wages with regularization of service.
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4685
3. IInd party filed Written Statement at Page 7/1 to
7/6. It is case of IInd party that Ist party was engaged
as casual Gangman from 15-2-90 subject to conditions
that if the documents produced by him are found false
at any time during their engagement, their service would
be terminated automatically without any notice. The
service certificate produced by him was found bogus.
His services is terminated from 19-4-90 as per conditions
in the deptt. rules and services. 150 candidates were
terminated including the Ist party workman.
4. It is submitted that Ist party workman was not
holding civil post under Union of India nor he held any
civil post earlier. The case of the applicant was of forgery
with the Railway Administration. He was not an
employee, he is not entitled to protection under I.D. Act,
1947. It is reiterated that Ist party workman was engaged
as casual gangman on daily rate of pay. He was posted
under the CPWI Abhanpur on 15- 2-90. The workman
was engaged subject to the condition laid down in the
appointment letter. As the service certificate is found
false after verification, his services are terminated from
19-4-90. The above facts are the repeated in the Written
Statement. The certificate of service produced by
employees found genuine after verification of service
That out of 861 casual candidates, services of 150 casual
candidates were terminated as the certificate produced
by them were found false after verification. Other
contentions of Ist party workman are denied. It is denied
that Ist party workman is entitled to reinstatement. That
workman had not completed 240 days continuous service.
IInd party prayed for rejection of the relief prayed by Ist
party workman.
5. Considering pleadings on record, the points
which arise for my consideration and determination are
as under. My findings are recorded against each of them
for the reasons as below:—
(i) Whether the action InAffirmative
of the management of
South Eastern Railway,
Bilaspur Division
terminating the services
of Shri P.Venkatswamy w.e.f.
19-4-90 is justified?
(ii) If so, to what relief Ist party workman is
workman is entitled to?" not entitled to relief
prayed by him.
REASONS
6. Ist party workman is challenging his termination
w.e.f. 19-4-90 for the allegations being produced false
service certificate/casual labour card. It is contented by
him that he was not given any opportunity before
terminating the services nor enquiry was held no notice
was issued, principles of natural justice violated, action
of management is violative of Article 20 of the
Constitution of India. All those contentions are denied
by IInd party. However IInd party has not disputed that
Ist party workman was engaged as casual labour from
15-2-90 and his services were terminated from 19-4-90 ..
Workman filed affidavit of evidence covering his
contentions in Statement of claim. Ist party workman in
his evidence on affidavit has stated that he was
appointed on 15-2-90 as Gangman. His services were
terminated from 19-4-90. He hardly worked for 2 months,
4 days. Casual cards are not condition precedent for
employment. Termination of his services without hearing
is nullity. That he was working on regular post and
vacancies are still existing. His termination amounts to
retrenchment. His services are terminated without enquiry
or without giving opportunity of hearing mandatory
provisions of Section 25-F not complied. He should
have been afforded opportunity of hearing/defence.
Workman in his cross-examination says that he was
appointed in February 1983, 2nd time he was appointed
on 1990, he worked for 2 months, he was not told reasons
for termination. He himself has not pleaded in his
statement of claim about bogus service certificate, it is
written by Advocate. No FIR was submitted against him.
That he has submitted certificate of date of birth. The
appointment letter is produced along with affidavit of
management's witness Shri R.S. Bepari. Condition No.1
provides if the service certificate found false, their
services will be terminated without notice. The past
service certificate finds reference. In bottom para of the
appointment order, Ist party workman accepted such
conditions and joined the service.
7. The evidence of management's witness Shri
Lingaraj rout is filed covering all contents in Written
statement filed by the management. His evidence in
cross-examination shows that he has no personal
knowledge about the termination/discharge. He has filed
affidavit of evidence on the basis of available record. He
only claim ignorance whether appointment order was
produced on record or not. He has no knowledge about
the verification of the certificate.
8. Learned counsel for Ist party workman Mr. Shashi
heavily emphasized that the employee was not given
opportunity of hearing. That even 240 days service is
not completed. The dispute is tenable.That the services
of Ist party workman are terminated on the ground that
he submitted false certificate casting stigma, no enquiry
was held, no opportunity of hearing was given and
therefore the allegation of cheating, forgery were made.
Therefore the termination of service is illegal. In reply,
learned counsel for IInd party management supports the
order of termination. That Ist party workman has not
completed 240 days, he is not holding civil post. Ist
party workman is not entitled to protection of article 311
4686
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
of the constitution of India. That his services are not
governed by CCS Rules and prays for rejection of relief
prayed by Ist party workman.
9. Learned counsel for Ist party Mr. Shashi relies
on—
Ratio held in the case of Nepal Singh Versus State
of U.P. reported in AIR 1990 Supreme Court 1459.
Their Lordship of the Apex Court held an order
terminating the services of a temporary Government
servant and ex-facie innocuous in that it does not
cast any stigma on the Government Servant or
visits him with penal consequences must be
regarded as effecting a termination simpliciter, but
it is discovered on the basis of material adduced
that although innocent in its terms the order was
passed infact with a view to punishing the
Government servant, it is a punitive order which
can be passed only after complying with Article
311.
From reading para-2 of the judgment, it is clear
that case before their Lordship was relating to temporary
Sub Inspector of Police posted at Shajapur. Ist party
workman is not holding any civil post, he was not regular
employee of the Railway. Therefore Article 311 is not
applicable in the present case.
From reading of Article 311, it is clear that the said
article only extends protection to the person who is
member of Civil Service of Union and All India Service
or Civil service of State or holds a civil post under
Union of a State. Therefore the ratio in above cited case
cannot be applied to the case at my hand.
10. Next reliance is placed by Mr. Shashi in ratio
held in case of—
Shri Anoop Jaiswal versus Government of India
and another reported in 1984(2) Supreme Court
Cases 369. Their Lordship held order punitive in
nature which in absence of any proper enquiry
amounted to violation of Article 311 (2) of the
Constitution, hence the order is liable to be set
aside to be reinstated in service with full benefits.
The case before their Lordship relate to
appointment of probationer as IPS Officer. Delay
was alleged on his part for P.T/unarmed combat
practice.
The workman was engaged as casual labour hardly
worked for about 2 months, was not holding any civil
post therefore the ratio in above cited case cannot be
applied to the present case at hand.
In case of Bhagwan Singh Rawat versus State of
MP and Others reported in 2003(4) M.P.H.T. 309, the
allegation against petitioner is of making demand of
illegal gratification. Removal from the post of Agriculture
Member. It was held by his Lordship that until unless
petitioner is found guilty of demanding illegal gratification
and charge is established petitioner could not be fastened
with the penalty of removal.
As the workman is not holding any civil post
neither he is regular employee of the Railway, the ratio
held in the case cannot be applied to the present case
at hand.
Reliance is placed on ratio held in case of Radha
Mohan Goswami and Others versus State of Madhya
Pradesh and Others reported in 2004(2) M.P.H.T. 49.
his Lordship considering the petitioners were
appointed on daily wage basis, the same persons
were appointed on daily wage. In compliance of
these orders they joined their posts. Suddenly order
of regularization in favour of employees cancelled
on 10-6-2003. Against this cancellation, his Lordship
held right accrued to petitioners when the order
was passed on 3-6-2003.An administrative order
having adverse effect on accrued right of employee
without giving him opportunity of hearing is
unsustainable. Hence order dated 10-6-2003
cancelling order of regularization dated 3-6-2003 was
quashed.
In present case, Ist party workman was never
regularized. The facts of above cited case are not
comparable. The facts of the above said case cannot be
beneficially applied to the case at hand.
11. Counsel for IInd party Shri Tripathi has
produced copy of Indian Railway Establishment.
Para 2001 Clause I(b) provides that casual labours
are also engaged on Railways for execution of
Railway projects, such as new lines, doubling,
conversion, construction of buildings, track
renewals, route relay interlocking Railway
electrification. Setting up of new units etc. Casual
Labour so engaged are referred to as project Casual
Labour. Such of those casual labour engaged on
open line (Revenue) works, who continue to do
the same work for which they were engaged or
other work of the same type for more than 120
days without a break will be treated as temporary
on completion of 120 days continuous
employment.
However Para-2004 of the said manual provides
that notice is necessary under any statutory obligation,
no notice is required for termination of service of casual
labour.
Condition in Exhibit M-l shows that if the service
certificate produced by such gangman found false after
verification. The services are liable to be terminated
without notice. 1st party workman accepted the said
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4687
appointment order and joined the service therefore said
condition No.1 is binding on him. He cannot be permitted
to claim contrary to the said condition. That the copies
of judgment in several matter by Hon'ble CAT,
Ahmedabad and Jabalpur are produced on record but
the judgment in R/191/91 by CGIT, Jabalpur, the facts are
not comparable and the jurisdiction of CAT is wide
whereas the jurisdiction of this Tribunal is limited to
decide the reference under I.D. Act. Therefore the
judgments delivered by CAT in different cases are not
binding.
12. Rule 3(1) of CCS Rules clearly provides that
those rules are not applicable to the Railway servant.
13. The legal position with respect to the
jurisdiction, powers of Central Administrative Tribunal
together provided in Section 14 of the Administrative
Tribunal's Act, 1985 is clear that the casual labours
acquiring temporary status does not become a temporary
Railway Servant or a member of Railway Service Card
holder under Railway. Section 14(1)(A) is not attracted
to the consideration of the Tribunal.
Learned counsel for 1st party Mr. Shashi during
further course of argument submitted that 1st party
workman is covered under Seetion 2(s) of I.D. Act.
The establishment of IInd party is covered as
Industry under Section 2 (j) of the I.D. Act. That
the dispute defined under Section 2(k) covers
difference between employees employer between
employers and workman etc. The appropriate
Government is Central Government, reference is
made. The reference is tenable. The services were
terminated without notice or giving opportunity of
hearing. Therefore the termination of service of 1st
party workman is illegal. Chapter V-A of I.D. Act
dealing with retrenchment under Section 25-B of
I.D. Act provides continuous service within
meaning of clause (1) for a period of one year if
the employee worked for 240 days during
preceding 12 calendar months. 1st party workman
has not completed 240 days continuous service
therefore he is not covered as workman under
Section 25(B) of I.D. Act. For said reason, 1st
party workman is not entitled to protection under
Section 25-F clause-(a), (b) of I.D. Act. He is not
entitled to notice prior to his termination or
retrenchment compensation provided under clause
(b) of Section 25-F. That when service certificate
produced by him is found false, no notice is
required as per the condition in Exhibit M-l. For
above reasons, I record finding on Point No.1 in
Affirmative.
14. Point No. 2—In view of my finding in Point
No.1 that the termination of services of 1st party workman
is legal, the workman is not entitled to any relief prayed
by him. Accordingly I record in my finding on point No. 2.
15. In the result, award is passed as under :—
(1) Termination of 1st party workman Shri P.
Venkatswamy w.e.f. 19-4-90 by Ilnd party management is
legal.
(2) Reliefs prayed by 1st party workman Shri P.
Venkatswamy is rejected.
16. Let the copies of the award be sent to the
Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment
as per rules.
R.B. PATLE, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 12 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1662-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj d:j oS';k
cSad fy- ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds
chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] psUUkbZ ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 102@2003)
dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 12&7&2013 dks çkIr
gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y&12011@27@2002&vkbZ vkj (ch&I)º
lqefr ldykuh] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 12th July, 2013
S.O. 1662.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 102/
2003) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Chennai as shown in the Annexure, in the
Industrial Dispute between the management of Karur
Vysya, Bank Ltd., and their workmen, received by the
Central Government on 12-7-2013
[ No. L-12011/27/2002-IR(B-I)]
SUMATI SAKLANI, Section Officer.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM -LABOUR COURT,
CHENNAI
Thursday, the 25th April, 2013
PRESENT :
A.N. JANARDANAN, Presiding Officer
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No.102/2003
[In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause
(d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of
the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), between the
Management of Karur Vysya Bank and their Workman.]
4688
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
BETWEEN
1.
The General Secretary
1st Party/1st Petitioner
All Banks Appraisers Union
Federation
No.1, Kattiyakaran Street
Cuddalore-607002
2.
The General Secretary
1st Party/2nd Petitioner
Karur Vysya Bank
Union
Employees Union
5, IV Street, Sowrastra
Nagar, Choolaimedu
Chennai-600094
AND
The Chairman
2nd Party/Management
Karur Vysya Bank Ltd.
(Head Office)
Karur -639002
APPEARANCE:
For the 1st and 2nd Party/Petitioner Union
M/s. V. Ajoy Khose and S. Manogaran, Advocates
For the 2nd Party/Management
M/s. T.S. Gopalan & Co., Advocates
AWAR D
The Central Government, Ministry of Labour and
Employment vide its Order No. L-12011/27/2002-IR(B-I)
dated 29-04-2003 referred the following Industrial Dispute
to this Tribunal for adjudication.
The schedule mentioned in that order is :
“Whether the demand of the All India Bank
Appraisers Federation, Tamil Nadu to regularize the
services of Jewel Appraisers (as per annexure) is the
Karur Vysya Bank Ltd. is legal and justified? If so,
what relief the workmen are entitled to?”
2. After the receipt of Industrial Dispute, this Tribunal
has numbered it as ID 102/2003 and issued notices to both
sides. Both sides entered appearance through their
Advocates and filed their Claim, Counter and Reply
Statement subsequently filing additional Claim Statement
and Counter Statement consequent to impleadment of
second petitioner/first party in the claim petition as per
order dated 11.07.2008 in IA 19/2007 in the ID as confirmed
in the order dated 26-03-2012 in Civil Appeal No. 3292 of
2012 arising out of SLP (Civil) No. 6689 of 2007 of the
Supreme Court. A relevant extract of the order of the
Supreme Court is as follows :
“In the result, therefore, we dispose of this appeal
with the observations that the appellant-Bank shall
within two weeks from today withdraw Writ Petition
(Civil) Nos. 22658 and 22659 of 2008, in which event,
the Tribunal shall be free to proceed with the
reference already made to which the Respondent
No. 1- Bank Employees Union has already been added
as a party. In view of the withdrawal of the said writ
petitions and revival of the reference made by the
Central Government, it will be unnecessary for the
Union of India to make a second reference on the
very same questions as are pending before the
Tribunal.”
3. The common case of both the petitioners in their
separate Claim Statement and Reply Statement in a nutshell
is that the jewel appraisers of the Respondent Bank
establishment are legally and factually entitled to be
regularized for the grounds and reasons set forth in the
Claim Statement as permanent employees in the respective
branches of the Respondent Bank with all service and
monetary benefits thereto and therefore it is prayed that
the reference may be answered passing an award in favour
of petitioners directing the Respondent Management to
regularize service of the Jewel Appraisers as in the annexure
(S.No. 1 to 12) with all service monetary benefits, continuity
of service, etc. of regular employees. The Hon'ble Supreme
Court was pleased to dispose of the Civil Appeal 3292/
2012 permitting First Party Union No. 2 to agitate their
demand for regularization of Jewel Appraisers in I.D.
No.1 02/2003. Demand of First Party Union No.2 for
regularization of all Jewel Appraisers shall be made direct
permanent Clerical Staff with time scale of pay and all other
attendant benefits from the date of completion of 480 days
of service from the date of their initial appointment .
4. In the separate Counter Statement filed before
and after the impleadment of the First Party Union No. 2
what is stated in a nutshell is as follows:
The Jewel Appraisers are neither regular staff nor
can they claim regularization in the bank. As per the
judgment of the Supreme Court in IOB case there is no
scope to hold that the Jewel Appraisers engaged by the
Respondent are employed in the service of the Bank. The
claim is to be rejected.
5.
Points for consideration are :
(i)
Whether the claim of the petitioner unions/first
party to regularize the service of the Jewel
Appraisers in Karur Vysya Bank Ltd. is legal and
justified.
(ii)
To what relief the concerned workmen are entitled?
Points (i) and (ii)
6. When the matter came up for further proceedings
First Party/2nd Petitioner made an endorsement on the
Claim Statement withdrawing the dispute. First Party/1st
Petitioner did not present himself for further proceedings
in the matter. Heard both sides. Perused the records.
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4689
7. As far as it relates to the First Party/2nd Petitioner,
their claim is no longer pursued up for the relief claimed by
them for regularization in the Respondent Bank. As far as it
relates to the First Party/1st Union, they have not had
been in the scene for prosecuting their claim since a long
time. It is not established that the workmen whose cause is
espoused by the Unions are workmen under the
Respondent Bank independent of their isolated status as
Jewel Appraisers who are only independent contractors
with no employer-employee relationship interse them and
the Bank Management. They have failed in carving out an
exception to the more or less settled position that Jewel
Appraisers are generally not employees of the Bank under
which they usually function as independent contractors
in terms of specific contracts for employment reached
between them in the absence of specific proof in otherwise
particular circumstances. Therefore it is only to be held
that the claim of the petitioner unions to regularize them
and declare them entitled to consequential benefits thereof
is not legal and justified. They are therefore not entitled to
any relief.
7. The reference is answered accordingly.
(Dictated to the P.A., transcribed and typed by him,
corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this
day the 25th April, 2013).
A. N. JANARDANAN, Presiding Officer
Witnesses Examined :
For the 1st Party/Petitioner : None
For the 2nd Party/Management : None
Documents Marked :
On the petitioner's side
Ex. No. Date Description
N/A
On the Management’s side
Ex. No. Date Description
Nil
ubZ fnYyh]15 tqykbZ]2013
dk-vk- 1663-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj dukZVd cSad
fy- ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] caxykSj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 71@2008)
dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 15&7&2013 dks çkIr
gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y&12012@123@2003&vkbZ vkj (ch&I)º
lqefr ldykuh] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 15th July, 2013
S.O. 1663.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 71/2008)
of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Bangalore as shown in the Annexure, in the
Industrial dispute between the management of Karnataka
Bank Limited, and their workmen received by the Central
Government on 15-7-2013.
[ No. L-12012/123/2003-IR(B-I)]
SUMATI SAKLANI, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
BANGALORE
Dated : 7th June, 2013
Present
:
Shri S. N. Navalgund, Presiding Office
CR No. 71/2008
Sri B. V. Chandrashekar, .....I Party
No. 15/3, Model House Street,
IV Street, N. R. Colony,
Bangalore-560 004
The Chairman and Managing .....II party
Director, Karnataka Bank
Limited, HR & IR Dept., P B No.
599, H O, Com., Mahaveer Circle,
PO Kankanady,
Mangalore - 575 002.
APPEARANCES :
I Party :
Shri S.T. Satheesh Naik,
Advocate
II Party :
Shri Ramesh Upadhyaya,
Advocate
AWARD
1.
The Central Government vide order No. L-12012/
123/2003- IR(B-I) dated 15.09.2008 in exercise of the power
conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section
(2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
(14 of 1947) made this reference for adjudication with the
following schedule:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of Karnataka
Bank Ltd., in removing the petitioner, Shri B.V.
Chandrashekar, Special Assistant· from service, is
justified? If not to what relief he is entitled?”
4690
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2. On receipt of the reference registering it in C R 71/
2008 when notices were issued to both the sides they
entered their appearances through their respective
advocates and I party filed his claim statement on
29-07-2010 and II Party its counter statement on
16-11-2010.
3. The I party in his claim statement claims that he
joined the service as Clerk with the II Party at its Bangalore
Chickpet Branch and while he was working at its Bangalore
City Market Branch received Office Order dated 23-07-1998
posting him as Special Assistant to Ajampur, Shimoga
Branch and being aggrieved by the said order in the middle
of the academic session he gave a representation dated
28-07-1998 with a prayer to modify the said order and to
accommodate him in anyone of the branches in and around
Bangalore City and as the same was neither considered
nor rejected he joined the Ajampur Branch on 10-10-1998
as he was threatened with dire consequences of removal
from service if he files appeal seeking modification of transfer
order. It is further contended that in the meanwhile the II
Party which was bent upon to get rid of his services on one
or the other pretext under the pretext that his request for
modification of orders will be considered favourably
obtaining his signatures on blank papers created VRS letter
dated 28-09-1998. It is further contended before the actual
date of its acceptance he gave voluminous representation
seeking continuation of his services but to his shock a
letter dated 20-11-1998 was received by him communicating
that his VRS letter dated 28-09-1998 is accepted and he will
be relieved of his duties from 01-04-1999. Being aggrieved
by the said letter he raised an industrial dispute and after
elaborate deliberations it ended in failure through failure
report dated 04-03-2003 and as no action was taken on the
said failure report by the Ministry of Labour he filed a Writ
Petition before the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in W P
No. 36852/2003 wherein the Hon’ble High Court by order
dated 08-03-2007 directed the Ministry to consider the
failure report and refer the matter for industrial adjudication
if warranted, the Central Government made this reference
for adjudication. It is further contended under the threat of
removal from services and using force, giving tension a
letter dated 28-09-1998 was obtained from him as if he seeks
voluntary retirement from services and that at the
intervention of elders and well wishers he gave a
representation dated 28-09-1998 seeking permission to
withdraw the alleged voluntary retirement from services
under letter dated 28-09-1998 but without giving any reply
to the said representation an order dated 28-11-1998 was
served on him communicating that his VRS is accepted
and he will be relieved from services w.e.f. 01-04-1999 and
as he has every right to withdraw the VRS letter before its
actual acceptance the action of the II Party is an act of
deprivation of his livelihood amounting to termination from
services practising of unfair labour practice under Section
2(ra) of I.D. Act 1947. With these averments it is prayed for
direction to the II Party to reinstate him into his original
post granting him all the consequential benefits like
reinstatement, full backwages, promotion etc., as if there
was no order for removal from services. The II party in its
Counter Statement filed on 16-05-2011 without disputing
that the I party joined the services as Clerk at its Bangalore
Chickpet branch on 06-05-1978 contended that while he
was working at its Bangalore City Market Branch in the
year 1998 after taking his willingness letter entrusted of
duties/promoted as Special Assistant and transferred to
Ajampura Branch of Shimoga Region by order dated
23-07-1998 and on receipt of the said order he requested
for modification of his transfer to his places of choice and
as same was not acceeded to, he got relieved from Bangalore
City Market Branch on 08-10-1998 and reported to Ajampur
Branch on 10-10-1998 and in the meanwhile he submitted a
letter dated 28-09-1998 seeking voluntary retirement and
considering the same favourably the acceptance of his
voluntary retirement was communicated to him by letter
dated 20-11-1998 that he will be retired on 01-04-1999 as
requested by him and there after the I Party through his
letter dated 14-11-1998 and 02-12-1998 requested to transfer
him to any one of the branches in Bangalore and as the
same was not acceded to he had written a letter dated
26-11-1998 thanking the management for having accepted
his letter for voluntary retirement and for having permitted
him to clear his loan liabilities as desired by him. It is further
contended though the II party wanted to relieve the I Party
prior to 01-04-1999 on his request the effective date for
voluntary retirement was fixed to 01-04-1999 to clear the
outstanding loans and that by his letter dated 01-03-1999
his request to postpone the date of relieving from
01-04-1999 to 10-05-1999 was rejected he filed suit in O S
65/1999 on the file of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Tarikere
seeking declaration of his voluntary retirement as null and
void and for permanent injunction from relieving him from
services w.e.f. 01-04-1999 and obtained an exparte order of
status-quo in the said suit on 31-03-1999 and due to that
order he could not be relieved from services w.e.f.
01-04-1999 and as the Hon'ble Court vacated the exparte
interim order on 17-04-1999 he stood relieved w.e.f.
01-04-1999. The II party further denying the allegations
that the voluntary retirement was created obtaining his
signature under the pretext that his request for modification
of his transfer order will be favourably considered or under
threat or coercion, it is contended that a valid order of
acceptance of the voluntary retirement fixing date of
relieving on 01-04-1999 was being passed on a specific
request he has come up with false allegations, it is prayed
to reject the reference.
4. At the outset, it has to be said that the term used
in the schedule of reference “removing the petitioner”
appears to be used loosely or inadvertently as it is nobodies
case that he is removed from service on any charge as
such it ought to have been “relieving the petitioner”.
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4691
5. After completion of the pleadings when the II
Party was called upon to adduce evidence justifying its
action its learned advocate while filing the affidavit of B
Dinesh Bhat, Senior manager, HR & IR Department
reiterating the counter statement examining him on oath as
MW 1 got exhibited Office copies of the appointment letter
relating to I party dated 27-03-1978;Memorandum dated
10-07-1984, 09,.09-1989, 04-05-1994 (04-05-1004) relating to
transfer of I Party; Original letter of I party dated
24-06-1998; Office copy of reply dated 17.08.1998; office
copy of the relieving certificate; original letters received
from I party dated 10-10-1998, 28-09-1998, 14-11-1998, 02-
12-1998 requesting for acceptance of his Voluntary
Retirement; copies of plaintiff IA in O S 65/1999 on the file
of Civil Judge (Jr. Div.)Tarikere & copy of order dated
17-04-1999 in the said suit; original letter from I party dated
26-12-1998 for accommodating him at Bangalore; Office
copy of letter dated 10-03-1999 intimating the party about
confirming date of his Voluntary Retirement being w.e.f. 01-
04-1999; original letter received from the I party dated 01-
03-1999 requesting him to relieve him on 10-05-1999 instead
of 01-04-1999; office copy of letter dated 20-04-1999
addressed to I Party relating to settlement of his PF, Gratuity
and Pension Two original receipt dated 14-08-1999 passed
by I party having received Rs. 95,596 and Rs. 1,42,404 as Ex
M-1 to Ex M-19 respectively and by filing the affidavit of H
S Sanjeev, Branch Manager, Ajampur Branch during 1996
to 1999 examined him on oath as MW 2 to confirm the two
letters received by him from the I Party dated
14-11-1998 and 02-12-1998 which were exhibited as Ex M-
10 and Ex M-11 in the evidence of MW 1. Interalia, the
learned advocate appearing for the I Party reiterating the
claim statement while filing the affidavit of I Party examining
him on oath as WW 1 got exhibited Copy of the
Representation given by him for Voluntary Retirement dated
28-07-1998; Letter of the II Party dated 20-11-1998 for having
'accepted his Voluntary Resignation; certified copy of the
order in W P No. 36852/2003 dated 08-03-2007 issuing
direction to the Ministry of Labour to consider the FOC
report and pass appropriate order; copy of the
representation purported to have been given by him for
cancellation of Voluntary Retirement letter submitted by
him to the Deputy General Manager as Ex W-2 to Ex W-5
respectively and in the cross-examination of MW 1 he had
got exhibited the transfer order served on the I party dated
23-07-1998 as Ex W-1.
6.
After close of the evidence of both the sides when
the matter was posted for arguments, learned advocate
appearing for the I party filed his written arguments on
27-02-2013 and today when the learned advocate appearing
for the II party addressed his arguments, the learned
advocate appearing for the I party gave his reply with a
request to pass Award expeditiously since the
superannuation age of the I Party is fast approaching.
7. On appreciation of the pleadings, Oral and
Documentary evidence brought on record by both the sides
in the light of the arguments put forward by the learned
advocates, I have arrived at conclusion of Rejecting the
Reference holding that the action of the management of
KBL in relieving the petitioner Sh. B. V. Chandrashekar,
Special Assistant from service w.e.f. 01-04-1999 pursuant
to his request through letter dated 28-09-1998 is legal and
justified for the following reasons :
REASONS
8. The claim of the I Party that the letter of Voluntary
Retirement purported to have been given by him dated
28-09-1998 exhibited as Ex M-9 is a creation obtaining his
signatures under the pretext that his request for
modification of order of transfer will be considered
favourable and under threat duress and coercion is a
convenient plea put forward by him without any
corroboration to overcome some how the letter of
resignation voluntarily submitted by him with a specific
request to relieve him w.e.f. 01-04-1999 enabling him to
participate in the Platinum Jubilee Deposit Mobilization
contest 1998- 1999 and to achieve the desired results. As
contended by the II party, I party in his two letters written
to the II party subsequent to the impugned letter of
voluntary retirement dated 14-11-1998 and 02-12-1998 which
are marked as Ex M-10 and Ex M-11 without whispering his
desire to withdraw his lefter of voluntary retirement he
having requested to extend the date of relieving him to
10-05-1999 from 01-04-1999 and further strengthened it by
his own suit filed in O S No. 65/1999 on the file of Civil
Judge (Junior Division), Tarikere wherein he challenged
the order of II Party rejecting his request to postpone the
date of relieving him to 10-05-1999 from 01-04-1999. In the
above suit filed by the I Party on 27-03-1999 he filed an
interim application under Order 39 Rule 2 read with section
151 of CPC supported by his own affidavit for issue of
temporary injunction restraining the defendants to relieve
him w.e.f. 01-04-1999 and in Para 2 of the affidavit filed in
support of the said Interim Application he states that he
has challenged the order of the defendants to relieve him
from the services w.e.f. 01-04-1999 after office. hours instead
of 10.05.1999 and obtained an exparte order of injunction
and admittedly that exparte interim order came to be vacated
on 17-04-1999, if at all the voluntary retirement letter dated
28-09-1998 was obtained from him under the pretext that
his request for change of place of transfer would be
favourably considered or under threat or coercion as alleged
by him he would have definitely stated so in his application
filed for interim injunction or if he had withdrawn or given
a letter for cancellation as now claimed he would have
mentioned that aspect also in the said suit. Therefore, this
theory that the letter of voluntary retirement was obtained
under threat, coercion or pretext of considering his request
for change of place is after thought some how to get over
his own folly/err committed in submitting the voluntary
retirement letter dated 28-09-1998. As far as the theory tried
to be put forward that he also submitted a letter for
4692
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
withdrawal or cancellation of the letter of resignation by
his letter dated 29-09-1998 appears to be a make believe
story to some how fit in his case to the facts of the decision
cited by him of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the
case of Shambu Murari Sinha vs. Project and Development
India Ltd. And anr. reported in 2002 RD SC 131 wherein it is
held Employee withdrawing application for voluntary
retirement before effective date being valid. It is pertinent
to note that though it is denied by the II party such a letter
of withdrawing' the resignation letter dated 29-09-1998 being
given, he just rest contended by producing a letter
purported to have been sent by him for cancellation of
voluntary retirement and getting it exhibited as Ex W-5
without producing any evidence having either forwarded
it through post or presenting it in person to any of the
responsible officials of the II party. Added to this in the
cross-examination of MW 1 his learned advocate has made
a suggestion to him that even this letter dated 29-09-1998
got marked as ex W-5 being obtained by the II Party for
cancellation of the VRS from Service. Thereby even the
case tried to be made out for the I Party that he withdrew or
requested for cancellation of his letter of voluntary
retirement before the date of its acceptance or date fixed
for relieving him is just a story created ingeniously to some
how get over from the effect of accepting the voluntary
retirement letter submitted by him. Under these
circumstances in the absence of the I Party failing to prove
or demonstrate that the impugned letter of voluntary
retirement dated 28-09-1998 was an outcome of signatures
obtained from him on blank papers under the pretext that
his request for change of place would be favourably
considered or either under threat or coercion and also to
prove that he gave letter of withdrawing the letter of
resignation as claimed by him as per Ex. W-5 absolutely I
find no reasons to say that the action of the management
in relieving him from service w.e.f. 01-04-1999 being not
justified. In the result, I arrive at conclusion of rejecting the
reference holding that the action of the management of
KBL in relieving the petitioner. Sh. B V Chandrashekar,
Special Assistant, w.e.f. 01-04-1999 is justifiedand that he
is not entitle for any relief and pass the following order :
ORDER
The Reference is Rejected holding that the action of
the management of Karnataka Bank Limited in removing
the petitioner, Shri B V Chandrashekar, Special Assistant
from service is legal and justified and that he is not entitle
for any relief. No order to cost.
(Dictated to U.D.C., transcribed by him, corrected
and signed by me on 7th June, 2013).
S. N. NAVALGUND, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 16 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1664-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj Hkkjrh; LVsV
cSad ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky; eqEcbZ ua- 1 ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 3@2006)
dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 12&7&2013 dks çkIr
gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y&12012@117@2005&vkbZvkj (ch&1)º
lqefr ldykuh] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the16th July, 2013
S.O. 1664.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 3/2006)
of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum -Labour
Court, No. 1, Mumbai as shown in the Annexure, in the
Industrial Dispute between the management of State Bank
of India and their workmen, received by the Central
Government on 12-7-2013.
[ No. L-12012/117/2005-IR (B-I)]
SUMATI SAKLANI, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL No. 1, MUMBAI
Present
JUSTICE G. S. SARRAF, Presiding Officer
REFERENCE No. : CGIT-1/3 OF 2006
Parties: Employers in relation to the management of
State Bank of India
And
Their workman (Ramesh Bhivaji Kamble)
Appearances:
For the Management
:
Mr. Nadkarni, Adv.
For the Union
:
Mr. Umesh Nabar, Adv.
State
:
Maharashtra
Mumbai, dated the 5th day of June, 2013.
AWARD PART-I
This is a reference made by the Central Government
in exercise of its powers under clause (d) of sub- section
(1) and sub-section (2-A) of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act 1947. The terms of reference given in the
schedule are as follows:
Whether the management of SBI has followed the
norms of justice, in discharging the services of the
workman? If not, to what relief is the workman entitled
to?
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4693
According to the statement of claim filed by State
Bank of India Staff Union (hereinafter referred to as the
Union) Ramesh Bhivaji Kamble joined the services of the
State Bank of India (hereinafter referred to as the Bank) as
Cashier-cum-Clerk w.e.f. 31.1.1979. The workman was then
designated as Head Assistant w.e.f. 12.6.1982. The workman
was having clean and unblemished service record of more
than seventeen years till he was subjected to disciplinary
action vide chargesheet dt.13.7.1996. The family of the
workman consisted of aged parents, six sisters, wife and
four children and he was the only earning member in the
family. The father of the workman borrowed heavy amounts
from private money lenders for performing marriages of the
sisters of the workman without the knowledge of the
workman. The workman was under legal and moral
obligations to secure loans advanced to his father because
the entire amount could not be repaid in time and by way of
security the workman was required to issue cheques which
were not to be used for realisation and, therefore, it was
not necessary to keep sufficient balance in the account.
The father of the workman repaid the entire amount after
selling the ancestral property. As regards withdrawal from
account No. NRE/4111 the account holder was known to
the workman and as such cash was handed over to the
bearer of the withdrawal slip. The suit filed against him was
withdrawn after satisfaction of the claim in the suit. During
the pendency of the enquiry proceedings the workman
was not suspended. The workman cleared all his liabilities
and no claim was pending against him. However, the Bank
did not apply its mind before issuing the chargesheet and,
therefore, the chargesheet is legally improper and bad in
law. The disciplinary proceedings were not fair in asmuchas
the Bank did not lead any evidence in support of the
allegations levelled against the workman. The copy of
enquiry proceedings was not made available to the
workman till a copy of enquiry report was furnished to the
workman for submitting his comments. Thus the
proceedings conducted against the workman are in
violation of the principles of natural justice. The Enquiry
Officer found the workman guilty of the charges nos.1, 2, 3
and 6 and exonerated him from the charges nos. 4, 5 and 7.
The findings of the Enquiry Officer holding the workman
guilty of charges nos. 1, 2, 3 and 6 are perverse and are
liable to be set aside. The enquiry held against the workman
was not fair. The Disciplinary Authority did not look into
the contentions of the workman before passing the order
of punishment of discharge from service and as such the
order of punishment is wholly perverse. The workman filed
an appeal which was dismissed by the Appellate Authority
without dealing with the contentions raised on behalf of
the workman. The Union has, therefore, prayed that the
Bank be directed to reinstate the workman to his original
post w.e.f.13.9.2003 with full back wages, continuity of
service and all consequential benefits.
According to the written statement filed by the Bank
the workman was working as Head Clerk in Killari branch.
He committed several irregularities such as resorting to
heavy outside borrowings without obtaining prior approval
of controllers, issuing cheques for large amounts without
obtaining/maintaining sufficient balance in his savings
bank accounts, misappropriating funds from the account
of the customer and manipulating transactions in depositors
account for his own benefit. All these acts amounted to
gross misconduct under the Shastry Award and subsequent
Bipartite Settlements. Several complaints against the
workman were received. A complaint was filed against the
workman under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments
Act and that complaint was withdrawn after payment of
the amount. The workman was issued chargesheet for the
followings acts of misconduct.
(i)
Resorting to heavy outside borrowing without
obtaining prior approval of controllers.
(ii)
Issuing cheques for large amounts without
maintaining sufficient balance in his savings bank
account, resulting in the said cheques being
returned unpaid when presented for payment.
(iii)
Misappropriating funds from the Account
No.NRE/4111 of Shri Vijaykumar C.Dombale and
utilizing the same for personal use.
(iv)
Manipulating transactions from some depositors
account in a malafide manner. For example
unauthorisedly withdrawing Rs.10,000 on 21st
May 1993 from SB Account No.A/9/1590 of Shri
Subhash Nile and crediting the amount by transfer
entry to Account No.P12/1590 of Shri Jagdale and
Account No.P/13/4612 of Shri R.D.Suryavanshi
and allowing withdrawal of Rs.4,000 from the
aforesaid account of Shri Suryavanshi even
though the balance in the account was only
Rs.304.85.
(v)
Negligently allowing of Rs. 5,000 from the
Account No.NRE/4111 on 2nd July 1993 without
verifying the specimen signature of the account
holder i.e. the withdrawal was signed in English
whereas the specimen signature of the account
holder on record was in Marathi.
(vi)
Several complaints being received from
the
constituents of the branch on account of above
acts as also a complaint being filed against him in
the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class at Ausa
under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.
(vii)
Seriously jeopardizing the interest of the Bank
and loss of faith of the constituents on account
of the aforesaid acts.
Initially S.B.Saraf, Chief Manager of Nanded branch
of the Bank was appointed as Enquiry Officer and
4694
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
consequent to his transfer C.H.Gaushal, Chief Manager,
Killari branch of the Bank was appointed as Enquiry Officer.
It was noticed that the workman was working at Killari
branch under Gaushal, therefore, to have a unbiased and
fair enquiry, V.Y.Potdar, Manager, Udgir branch of the Bank
was appointed as Enquiry Officer in place of Gaushal. The
workman was duly represented by his defence
representative V.W.Patil. The Enquiry Officer conducted
the enquiry in accordance with the principles of natural
justice and gave full and fair opportunity to the workman
to defend himself. The Enquiry Officer vide report
dt.30.11.1998 found the workman guilty of charges nos.1,2,3
and 6. A copy of the enquiry report was sent to the workman
vide letter dt.7.6.1999. The workman made his submission
vide letter dt.6.7.1999. After considering the enquiry report
and the submissions made by the workman the Disciplinary
Authority proposed the punishment of discharge with
superannuation benefits as would otherwise be due to the
workman at that stage and without disqualification from
future employment. Show cause notice was then given to
the workman. During the personal hearing the workman
pleaded for sympathetic view of the matter and modification
of the penalty. After carefully considering all the aspects
of the matter the Disciplinary Authority passed his final
order on 13.9.2003 and imposed the punishment as
proposed. The Appellate Authority rejected the appeal of
the workman vide order dt.19.1.2004. According to the
written statement the Bank conducted legal, fair and proper
enquiry. The Bank, has, therefore, prayed that the reference
be rejected.
The Union has filed rejoinder wherein it has reiterated
its stand.
Following Issues have been framed as per order
sheet dt.14.3.2011.
(i)
Whether the enquiry held against the workman is
fair and proper?
(ii)
Whether the findings of the Enquiry Officer are
perverse?
(iii)
Whether the punishment given to the workman is
shockingly disproportionate?
(iv)
What relief?
The Union has filed affidavit of the workman Ramesh
Bhivaji Kamble and he has been cross-examined by learned
counsel for the Bank. The Bank has filed affidavit of Vijay
Potdar and he has been cross-examined by learned counsel
for the Union.
Heard Shri Nabar on behalf of the Union and Shri
Nadkarni on behalf of the Bank.
Issues nos. (i) and (ii): Principles of natural justice
are not embodied rules. It cannot be put in a straightjacket
formula. It depends upon the facts and circumstance of
each case. However, to sustain the allegation of violation
of principles of natural justice one must establish that
prejudice has been caused to the workman for non-
observance of principles of natural justice.
The workman has stated in his cross-examination as
under:
This is correct that the Bank held an enquiry against
me in respect of the chargesheet dt.13.7.1996. This is
correct that I fully participated in the enquiry. I
appointed defence nominee of my choice. Whatever
transpired it was correctly recorded in the order
sheets of the enquiry. I and my defence nominee
would sign every order sheet. If my defence nominee
was not present on account of some reason the
Enquiry Officer would adjourn the matter. Whatever
documents Bank submitted in the enquiry, copies of
those documents were given to me. I also had full
opportunity to submit document in my defence and
accordingly I submitted. Ex.M-09 (page 6 to 12) are
the enquiry proceedings. I was given a copy of the
enquiry report and I filed an appeal. I was given
personal hearing in the appeal. This is correct that I
submitted reply of the chargesheet.
It is amply clear from the statement of the workman himself
that no prejudice has been caused to him. As such there is
no violation of any principle of natural justice.
This is correct that the Bank has not led any oral
evidence before the Enquiry Officer. But there was no
occasion for the Bank to bring oral evidence to prove the
documents as the genuineness of the documents relied by
the Bank was not challenged by the workman. If the
allegations in the enquiry are such which can be proved by
the documents then it is not obligatory for the Bank to
bring oral evidence. In this case the genuineness of the
documents has not been denied by the workman and,
therefore, the Union cannot complain that no witness has
come forward to prove the documents.
From the above discussion it is clear that the enquiry
held against the workman is fair and proper and the findings
of the Enquiry Officer cannot be said to be perverse.
Issues nos.(i} and (ii) are, therefore, decided in favour
of the Bank and against the workman.
Award Part-I is passed accordingly.
JUSTICE G. S. SARRAF, Presiding Officer
ANNEXURE-II
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 1, MUMBAI
PRESENT :
JUSTICE G. S. Sarraf, Presiding Officer
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4695
REFERENCE No. : CGIT-1/3 OF 2006
Parties: Employers in relation to the management of
State Bank of India
And
Their workman (Ramesh Bhivaji Kamble)
Appearances:
For the Management
:
Mr. Nadkarni, Adv.
For the Union
:
Mr. Umesh Nabar, Adv.
State
:
Maharashtra
Mumbai, dated the 18th day of June, 2013
AWARD PART-II
This is a reference made by the Central Government
in exercise of its powers under clause (d) of sub section (1)
and sub-section (2-A) of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act 1947. The terms of reference given in the
schedule are as follows:
Whether the management of SBI has followed the
norms of justice, in discharging the services of the
workman? If not, to what relief is the workman
entitled to?
It is not necessary to narrate the facts here as the
facts have been stated in detail in the Award Part-I dt.
5-6-2913 passed by this Tribunal.
(i)
Whether the enquiry held against the workman is
fair and proper?
(ii)
Whether the findings of the Enquiry Officer are
perverse?
(iii)
Whether the punishment given to the workman is
shockingly disproportionate?
(iv)
What relief?
Issues nos.(i) and (ii) have been decided in favour of
the Bank and against the workman. Thereafter the workman
has filed his affidavit and he has been cross examined by
learned counsel for the Bank. The Bank has not led any
evidence.
Heard Mr. Nabar learned counsel for the workman
and Mr.Nadkarni learned counsel for the Bank.
Issue no. (III) : The workman was found guilty of
excessive borrowings and misappropriation. The
Disciplinary Authority awarded the punishment of
discharge with superannuation benefits as would otherwise
be due to the workman at that stage and without
disqualification from future employment.
Once there has been an enquiry in accordance with
principles of natural justice and the findings recorded at
that enquiry are not frowned upon then this Tribunal should
not interfere with the quantum of punishment unless the
punishment is shown to be vitiated by malafides. This
certainly is not the position in the present case.
The Banking business requires absolute devotion,
integrity and honesty and if this is not there surely the
confidence of the public/depositors will be impaired. In
such a case there should be no place for generosity or
sympathy.
The fact that the workman was not suspended during
the pendency of the enquiry proceedings and the fact that
there is a long interval between the submission of the
enquiry report and the order of punishment passed against
the workman are of no help to the workman while
considering whether the punishment is shockingly
disproportionate.
Considering all the facts and circumstances of the
matter. I do not think that the punishment imposed against
the workman is shockingly disproportionate to the charges
proved against him so as to warrant interference by this
Tribunal.
Issue no. (iii) is decided against the workman.
Issue no. (iv): The workman is not entitled to any
relief.
Award Part-II is passed accordingly.
JUSTICE G. S. SARRAF, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 16 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1665-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj Hkkjrh; LVsV
cSad ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 105@2003)
dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 16&7&2013 dks çkIr
gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y&12012@477@2001&vkbZvkj (ch&I)º
lqefr ldykuh] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the16th July, 2013
S.O. 1665.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 105/
2003) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in the
Industrial Dispute between the management of State Bank
of India and their workmen, received by the Central
Government on 16-7-2013.
[No. L-12012/477/2001-IR (B-I)]
SUMATI SAKLANI, Section Officer
4696
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR
COURT, JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/l05/2003
Presiding Officer : SHRI R. B. PATLE
The General Secretary,
Daily Wages Bank Employees Association,.
9, Sanwer Road,
Ujjain
. . .Workman/Union
Versus
The Asstt. General Manager,
State Bank of India,
Zonal Office, Hamidia Road,
Bhopal (MP)
. . .Management
AWARD
Passed on this 17th day of June, 2013
1. As per letter dated 14-2-2003 by the Government
of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is
received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under
Section-10 of I.D. Act, 1947 as per Notification No. L-12012/
477/2001-IR (B-I). The dispute udner reference relates to :
‘‘Whether the action of the management of Asstt.
General Manager, State Bank of India, Bhopal in
terminating the services of Shri Sanjay Jawkhedkar
w.e.f. 11-12-1998 instead of regularizing him is
justified? If not, what relief the workman is entitled?"
2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to
the parties. Ist party workman submitted statement of claim
at Page 2/2 to 2/5. The case of 1st party workman is that he
was working on vacant post of messenger from 11-2-1991.
He rendered his services satisfactorily. He was working
for 8 hours. That Head Office had issued circular for
absorbing casual daily wage employees. That his services
were terminated from 11-12-98. He claims that he had
completed 240 days continuous service since. initial
appointment. That he was forcibly handed over cheque of
Rs. 5760. He was also paid bonus Rs. 3604 That he had
worked for total 1890 days. That his services were
terminated without displaying list of retrenched employees.
The termination is in violation of Section 25-G, F & N of
I.D.Act. Ist party prays for his reinstatement with
consequential benefits.
3. IInd party filed Written Statement at Page 1111 to
11/14. Objection is taken that Ram Nagwanshi, General
Secretary of the Union was terminated from service of the
Bank. He cannot be present for workman. That workman
was employed purely on daily wages as Messenger. In
1985, he worked for 76 days, in 1986 for 70 days, during
period 1993 to 1998 he worked for 1316 days at Indore
Main Branch as daily wager. That Ist party was
discontinued after payment of wages on account of notice
and retrenchment compensation amount Rs. 5760 was paid.
The IInd party further submits that as per under in
conciliation proceeding bonus Rs. 3604 was paid. The 1st
party workman was engaged on contract basis as per
exigency of work. His discontinuance is covered under
Section 2(oo) of I.D. Act.
4. IInd party further submits that workman has
not completed 240 days service during any of the
calendar years. He is not covered as workman under
Section 25(B) of I.D. Act. That as per settlement dated.
17-11-87, a temporary employee in subordinate cadre
were given chance of being considered for appointment
in the Bank. Those who completed. 240 days temporary
service during 12 months or less after 1975, those who
have completed 270 days aggregate temporary service
in any continuous block of 36 calendar months after
1-7-75, those who have completed minimum of 30 days
aggregate temporary service in any calendar year after
1975 or a minimum of 70 days aggregate temporary
service in any continuous block of 36 months after
1-7-75. The details of the settlements are given in
Para-5. The settlement was extended time to time on
27-10-88, 9-1-91, 30-1-96. The settlement was last
extended till 31-3-97. IInd party submits that workman
has submitted application. He was called for interview
on 23-1-90. He could not be given permanent
employment as his name was much below in Waiting
List. Ist party did not submit his application to the
Bank. Therefore name of Ist party was not considered
for employment in the Bank. Ist party was engaged
purely on daily wage basis during 1993 to 1998 as per
exigency. He could not be regularized being casual
employee. Rest of the contention of workman are
denied. It is submitted that workman had not completed
240 days service in one calendar year. He was not
appointed against available vacant post. Ist party
workman had worked for 1360 days form 1993 to 1998.
It is denied that termination of service of Ist party is in
violation of Section 25-F,G & N of I.D. Act. IInd party
prayed for rejection of reliefs prayed by workman.
5. Considering pleadings on record, the points which
arise for my consideration and determination are as under.
My findings are recorded against each of them for the
reasons as below :—
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4697
“(i) Whether the action of the
management of Asstt.
In Negative
General Manager, State Bank
of India, Bhopal in termi-
nating the services of
Shri Sanjay Jawkhedkar
w.e.f. 11-12-1998 instead of
regularizing him is legal?
(ii) If so, to what relief the
As per order
workman is entitled to?”
REASONS
6. The dispute under reference relates to whether the
action of the IInd party management in terminating his
services instead of regularizing him is legal? From pleadings
between parties, there is no dispute that workman was
working for 146 days from 10-7-85 till 1986. He had worked
for 146 days. Thereafter Ist party workman was engaged
from 1991 and his services were terminated on 11-12-98.
The IInd party management in his Written Statement has
admitted, that Ist party workman was called for interview
on 31-1-90, his name was in the Waiting List much below
he could not be given permanent employment.
7. The workman filed affidavit of his evidence on
19-12-2010 but did not enter in witness box for cross-
examination on behalf of Ilnd party. The ordersheet dated
29-12-12 finds clear observation that workman filed evidence
but he submitted that he doesnot want to produce witness
for cross-examination. As such his evidence is not to be
looked into in the case. The evidence of workman was
closed. Thus evidence of workman cannot be read on
evidence in case.
8. However the documents produced by workman
are admitted by the management. Exhibit W-1 is copy of
reference order, W-2 is letter dated 27-1-94 by Asstt. General
Manager to Branch Manager, Bhopal. The said letter is
clear that casual employees could be engaged on temporary
basis where it is absolutely necessary. The Waiting List
was available in the Regional Office. Suitable action could
be done considering the names and address of the
candidates in Waiting List. That there was no satisfied
time in which the candidates in Waiting List can have
employed. In para-2, it is made clear that the candidates in
Waiting List in different categories were to be appointed.
Exhibit W-3 is the copy of cheque of Rs. 3604 in name of
workman. Exhibit W-4 is letter given by Dy.General Manager
finds clear reference that workman Jawkhedkar was daily
wage employee. He was engaged as per availability of work
on daily wages. Exhibit W-5 is copy of cheque of Rs. 5716
in name of workman. Exhibit W-6 is copy of cheque of
Rs. 3604.
9. Witness of IInd party Dilip Mogre filed affidavit of
his evidence. He has stated that during 93 to 98 workman
had worked for 1316 days. However its details are not shown
in his affidavit. In para-3 of his affidavit, the witness has
stated that workman has not completed 240 days
continuous service during any calendar year. In para-6 of
his affidavit, he has stated that on 23-1-90, workman was
interviewed. His name was included in the list considering
the length of his service as casual employee. The list is not
produced by Ilnd party. It is not known why services of
workman were not regularized. The order of termination of
services of workman Exhibit W-5 finds reasons for
retrenchment that they there are no approved branches
available, your services stands terminated with immediate
effect. The IInd party has not produced the Waiting List in
which the name of workman was included. No document
about filling of vacancies from time to time by Ilnd party
are produced. The order Exhibit W-5 finds payment of
retrenchment compensation Rs. 4320 and one month's pay
Rs. 1440. However the list of retrenched employees is not
displayed, no documents are produced in that regard by
the IInd party.
10.Section 25-F of I.D. Act 1947 provides—
" No workman employed in any industry who has
been in continuous service for not less than one
year under an employer shall be retrenched by
that employer until—
(a) The workman has been given one month's notice
in writing indicating the reasons for retrenchment
and the period of notice has expire, or the workmen
has been paid in lieu of such notice, wages for the
period of the notice,
(b) The workman has been paid at the time of
retrenchment compensation which shall be equivalent
to fifteen days average pay for every completed year
of continuous service or any part thereof in excess
of six months and,
(c) Notice in the prescribed manner is served on the
appropriate Government or such authority as may
be specified by the appropriate Government by
notification in the Official Gazette."
Secion 25-G provides-
“Where any workman in an industrial establishment,
who is a citizen of India, is to be retrenched and he
belongs to a particular category of workmen in that
establishment, in the absence of any agreement
between the employer and the workman in this behalf,
the employer shall ordinarily retrench the workman
who was the last person to be employed in that
category, unless for reasons to be recorded the
employer retrenches any other workman.”
11. Thus there is no evidence about compliance of
Section 25-G When approved branches were not available,
why the services of 1st party workman alone was
terminated. Seniority list of employees was not produced
4698
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
even Waiting List was not produced by the IInd party. The
evidence on record is clear that workman was interviewed
in 1990. He was selected for regularization, his name was
included in the Waiting List. The said list is not produced.
The principle of last come Ist go was not followed. The
Union Representative Mr. Ram Nagwanshi relies on ratio
held in—
“Case of Samishta Dube and City Board Etawah and
another reported in 1999(81 )FLR 746. Their Lordship
held in absence of any agreement between the
employer and the workmen in behalf the employer
shall ordinarily retrench the workman who was last
person to be employed in that category, unless for
reasons to be recorded, the employer retrenches any
other person.”
In case of Regional Manager, SVI versus Rakesh
Kumar Tewari reported in 2006( 108)FLR 733 . Their Lordship
held provisions of Section 25-G , H doesnot require
continuation employment of workman within the meaning
of Section 25 (B) of I.D. Act.
In case of Jaipur Development Authority Versus
Ramsahai and another in 2007-1 Supreme Court Cases (L&S)
518. Their Lordship held Section 25-G is not imperative in
nature for reasons to be recorded, the employer may retrench
a workman other tha as required by the Last come first go
principle. That applicability of Section 25-G and 25-H of
I.D.Act, requirement of continuous work in terms of Section
25(8) is not a requirement.
12. IInd party 'management has not produced Waiting
List, no documents are produced as to how many candidates
in Waiting List were given opportunity. How many
vacancies were filled and why Ist party workman was not
regularized in service after his name appeared in the
Selection List. The action of the management instead of
regularizing his services terminating the services of Ist party
workman is illegal. For above reasons, .I record my finding
in Point No.1 in Negative.
13. Point No. 2—The question is what relief workman
is entitled. The workman has not entered in witness box for
his cross-examination. The services of Ist party workman
were terminated in 1998. He had continuously worked from
1993 to 1998. He was selected after, absorption in regular
staff as per the settlement. He was not given appointment
order for long period. Considering above aspects, 1st party
workman deserves to be regularized in service on vacant
post as per Waiting List prepared by management of IInd
party. As workman not made available for cross-
examination, his evidence cannot be accepted. He cannot
be allowed backwages.
14. In the result award is passed as under:-
1. The action of the management. of Asstt. General
Manager, State Bank of India, Bhopal in terminating the
services of Shri Sanjay Jawkhedkar w.e.f. 11-12-1998 instead
of regularizing him is illegal.
2. IInd party management is directed to reinstate
workman and regularize his services as per the Waiting
List prepared after interview held on 23-1-90. He is not
entitled to back wages.
15. Let the copies of the award be sent to the
Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment
as per rules.
R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 16 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1666-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj jsy fodkl
fuxe fy- ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds
chp vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] Hkqous'oj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 70@2012)
dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 16&7&2013 dks çkIr
gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y&41011@17@2009&vkbZvkj (ch&I)º
lqefr ldykuh] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the16th July, 2013
S.O. 1666.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 70/
2012) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum-
Labour Court, Bhubaneswar as shown in the Annexure, in
the Industrial Dispute between the management of Rail
Vikash Nigam Ltd., and their workmen, received by the
Central Government on 16-7-2013.
[No. L-41011/17/2009-IR (B-I)]
SUMATI SAKLANI, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL
TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
BHUBANESWAR
Present :
Shri J. Srivastava,
Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-cum-Labour
Court, Bhubaneswar.
I.D. CASE No. 70/2012
Date of Passing Order - 13th June, 2013
Between :
1. The Managing Director,
HCIL-AD HIKARYYA-ARSS (HAA) (JV)
HIG-46, BDA Enclave, G.M. Marg, Jayadev Vihar,
Bhubaneswar (Orissa) -751 013.
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4699
2. The Chief Project Manager, Rail Vikash
Nigam Ltd., Metro Tower, Vani Vihar,
Bhubaneswar (Orissa)
1st Party-Managements.
And
The President, All Orissa Railway Contractors'
Workers' Union, VR-5/l, Unit-III, Kharvela Nagar,
Bhubaneswar (Orissa) - 1.
2nd Party-Union.
Appearances :
None
:
For the 1 st Party-
Management.
None
:
For the 2nd Party-
Union.
ORDER
This reference was received in this Tribunal on
20.7.2012. The 2nd Party-Union was required to file the
statement of claim within fifteen days of receipt of the order
of reference in this Tribunal, but no statement of claim was
filed. Therefore a notice was issued to the 2nd Party-Union
on 6.12.2012 asking it to file the statement of claim by
17.12.2012. But when no response was received a further
notice was issued through regd. post to the 2nd Party-
Union on 4.3.2013 calling it to file the statement of claim by
23.4.2013. But even after issuing notice under regd. cover
no statement of claim was filed. The 2nd Party-Union was
further allowed time to file statement 'of claim by 13.6.2012,
but neither any-one appeared on behalf of the 2nd Party-
Union nor filed any statement of claim. Hence it appears
that the 2nd Party-Union is not interested in prosecuting
its case. It might be that the 2nd Party-Union has settled
the dispute out of court with the 1st Party-Management
and because of which the Union is not taking any steps in
the matter under dispute.
2. In the above circumstances there is no use to keep
the case pending indefinitely. Hence a no-dispute award is
required to be passed in the case. Accordingly a no-dispute
award is passed and the reference is answered in the above
terms.
JITENDRA SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 16 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1667-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ lh ,y
ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vlulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 32@2012)
dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 16&7&2013 dks çkIr
gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y&22012@69@2012&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the16th July, 2013
S.O. 1667.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 32/
2012) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the
Industrial Dispute between the management of J.K. Nagar
Colliery, Satgram Area, and their workmen, received by
the Central Government on 16-7-2013.
[ No. L-22012/69/2012-IR (CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL
TRIBUNAL-CUM-lABOUR COURT, ASANSOL
Present :
Sri Jayanta Kumar Sen, Presiding Officer
REFERENCE No. 32 OF 2012
Parties :
The management of J.K. Nagar Colliery,
Satgram Area,
M/s. ECl, Burdwan(WB)
Vs.
Sri D.K. Routh, Branch Jt. Secy., CMC
(HMS), Aradanga, Asansol(W.B.)
REPRESENTATIVES:
For the management :
None
For the union (Workman): None
INDUSTRY : COAL
STATE: West Bengal
Dated : 03.04.13
AWARD
In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-
section (1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947), Govt. of India
through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L-22012/
69/2012- I.R.(CM-II) dated 11.09.2012 has been pleased to
refer the following dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal.
4700
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of J.K. Nagar
Colliery not to pay HA @ 10% of basic to Sri
Mahendra Muchi is fair, appropriate and justified,
while J.K. Nagar comes under Raniganj (UA), which
is classified 'C' Class city and HRA payable is 10% of
basic and even in view classification comes under 'Z'
class where rate of HRA is 10% of Basic Pay?”
Having received the Order of Letter No.L-22012/69/
2012-I.R (CM-II) dated 11.09.2012 of the above said
reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour,
New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference case
No. 32 of 2012 was registered on 25.09.12 and accordingly
an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through
the registered post to the parties concerned directing them
to appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their
written statements along with the relevant documents and
a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance
of the said order notices by the registered post were sent
to the parties concerned.
On perusal of the case record, it has been found that
the workman is neither appearing nor taking any step since
long. It seems that the workman is now no more interested
to proceed with the case. Since the workman is not
interested to proceed with the case, the case is closed and
accordingly an order of "No Dispute Award" is hereby
passed.
ORDER
Let an "Award" be and the same is passed as "No
Dispute" existing. Send the copies of the order to the Govt.
of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for information and
needful. The reference is accordingly disposed of.
JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 16 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1668-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ lh ,y
ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vlulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 5@2007)
dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 16&7&2013 dks çkIr
gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y&22012@225@2006&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the16th July, 2013
S.O. 1668.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 5/2007)
of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial
Dispute between the management of M/s. Eastern
Coalfields Limited, and their workmen, received by the
Central Government on 16-7-2013.
[No. L-22012/225/2006-IR (CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL
TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL
Present : Sri Jayanta Kumar Sen, Presiding Officer
REFERENCE NO. 05 OF 2007
Parties :
The management of Chinakury
Colliery, M/s. ECL, Burdwan(WB)
Vs.
The Chief Org. Secy., KMC,
Sitarampur (W.B.)
REPRESENTATIVES:
For the management :
None
For the union (Workman) :
Sri R.K. Tripathi, Ld.
Representative
INDUSTRY : COAL
STATE: West Bengal
Dated -16.04.13
AWA RD
In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-
section(1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947), Govt. of India
through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L-22012/
225/2006-I.R.(CM-II) dated 08.01.2007 has been pleased to
refer the following dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal.
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of Chinakury
Mine No. 111 under Sodepur Area of M/s. ECL in dismissing
Shri Santosh Bouri w.e.f. 24.06.2004 is legal and justified? If
not, to what relief is the workman entitled?"
Having received the Order of Letter No.L-22012/225/
2006-LR (CM-II) dated 08.01.2007 of the above said
reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New
Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference case No.
05 of 2007 was registered on 19.02.07and accordingly an
order to that effect-was passed to issue notices through
the registered post to the parties concerned directing them
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4701
to appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their
written statements along with the relevant documents and
a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance
of the said order notices by the registered post were sent
to the parties concerned.
On perusal of the case record, it has been found that
Sri R.K. Tripathi, representative of the Union, submitted
that the workman had already reinstated in the service and
was died thereafter and then his wife has got employment
in her plea. Sri Tripathi also prayed for the closure of the
case. Since the workman has passed away, the case is
closed and accordingly an order of "No Dispute Award" is
hereby passed.
ORDER
Let an "Award" be and the same is passed as "No
Dispute" existing. Send the copies of the order to the Govt.
of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for information and
needful. The reference is accordingly disposed of.
JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 16 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1669-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ lh ,y
ds çca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vlulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 38@2008)
dks çdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 16&7&2013 dks çkIr
gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y&22012@59@2008&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the16th July, 2013
S.O. 1669.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 38/
2008) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the
Industrial Dispute between the management of M/s.
Eastern Coalfields Limited, and their workmen, received
by the Central Government on 16-7-2013.
[No. L-22012/59/2008-IR (CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL
TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL
Present : Sri Jayanta Kumar Sen,
Presiding Officer
REFERENCE No. 38 OF 2008
Parties :
The management of Paras Cole
Colliery, M/s. ECL, Burdwan(WB)
Vs.
The Vice-President, KMC, Burdwan
(W.B).
REPRESENTATIVES:
For the management :
None
For the union (Workman) :
Sri S.K. Pandey,
Ld. Representative
INDUSTRY : COAL
STATE: West Bengal
Dated -21.02.13
AWA RD
In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-
section(1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947), Govt. of India
through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L-22012/
59/2008-I.R.(CM-II) dated 30.06.2008 has been pleased to
refer the following dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal.
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of M/s. ECL
in dismissing Shri Gujara Hari from service w.e.f.
21.05.2005 is legal and justified? To what relief is the
claimant entitled?"
Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/59/
2008-1. R (CM-II) dated 30.06.2008 of the above said
reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New
Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference case No.
38 of 2008 was registered on 15.07.08 and accordingly an
order to that effect was passed to issue notices through
the registered post to the parties concerned directing them
to appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their
written statements along with the relevant documents and
a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance
of the said order notices by the registered post were sent
to the parties concerned.
On perusal of the case record, it has been found that
the workman has already joined in the service. Since the
workman has joined in the service, the case is closed and
accordingly an order of "No Dispute Award" is hereby
passed.
ORDER
Let an "Award" be and the same is passed as "No
Dispute" existing. Send the copies of the order to the Govt.
of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for information and
needful. The reference is accordingly disposed of.
JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer
4702
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ubZ fnYyh] 16 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1670-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ lh
,y ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@ Je U;k;ky; vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k
37@2008) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 16&7&2013
dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y&22012@50@2008&vkbZ vkj (lh,e&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 16th July, 2013
S.O. 1670.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Diputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 37/2008)
of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial
dispute between the management of M/s. Eastern
Coalfields Limited, and their workmen, received by the
Central Government on 16-7-2013
[No. L-22012/50/2008-IR(CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT,
ASANSOL
Present: Sri Jayanta Kumar Sen, Presiding Officer
REFERENCE No. 37 OF 2008
Parties :
The management of Sodepur (R) Colliery,
M/s. ECL, Burdwan (WB)
Vs.
The Chief Org. Secy. KMC. Sitarampur (WB)
Representatives :
For the management
:
None
For the union (Workman) :
Sri R. K. Tripathi, Ld.
Representative
Industry : Coal
State : West Bengal
Dated - 16-4-13
AWARD
In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d)
of Sub-section (1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of
the Industrial Disptues Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),
Government of India through the Ministry of Labour
vide its Order No. L-22012/50/2008-IR(CM-II) dated
30-6-2008 has been pleased to refer the following
dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal.
SCHEDULE
‘‘Whether the action of the management of M/s.
ECL in dismissing Shri Mantu Shaw from service
w.e.f. 01-12-1998 is legal and justified? To what
relief is the claimant entitled?”
Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/
50/2008-IR (CM-II) dated 30-6-2008 of the above said
reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour,
New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference
case No. 37 of 2008 was registered on 15-7-08 and
accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue
notices through the registered post to the parties
concerned directing them to appear in the court on the
date fixed and to file their written statements along with
the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support
of their claims. In pursuance of the said order notices by
the registered post were sent to the parties concerned.
On perusal of the case record, it has been found
that Sri R. K. Tripathi, representative of the Union,
submitted that the workman has already reinstated in
the service and he prayed for the closure of the case.
Since the workman has already reinstated in service, the
case is closed and accordingly an order of ‘‘No Dispute
Award” is hereby passed.
ORDER
Let an ‘‘Award” be and the same is passed as ‘‘No
Dispute” existing. Send the copies of the order to the
Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for
information and needful. The reference is accordingly
disposed of.
JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 16 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1671-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ lh
,y ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@ Je U;k;ky; vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k
45@2006) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 16&7&2013
dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y&22012@225@2005&vkbZ vkj (lh,e&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 16th July, 2013
S.O. 1671.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Diputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 45/2006)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4703
of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial
dispute between the management of Kenda Area of M/s.
Eastern Coalfields Limited, and their workmen, received
by the Central Government on 16-7-2013
[No. L-22012/225/2005-IR(CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT,
ASANSOL
Present: Sri Jayanta Kumar Sen, Presiding Officer
REFERENCE No. 45 OF 2006
Parties :
The management of Chora Block Incline,
Kenda Area, M/s. ECL, Burdwan (WB)
Vs.
The Gen. Secy. KMC. Asansol, Burdwan (WB)
Representative :
For the management
:
None
For the union (Workman) :
Sri S. K. Pandey, Ld.
Representative
Industry : Coal
State : West Bengal
Dated - 03-04-13
AWARD
In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d)
of Sub-section (1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of
the Industrial Disptues Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),
Government of India through the Ministry of Labour
vide its Order No. L-22012/225/2005-IR(CM-II) dated
2-8-2006 has been pleased to refer the following dispute
for adjudication by this Tribunal.
SCHEDULE
‘‘Whether the action of the management of Chora
Block Incline, under Kenda Area of M/s. Eastern
Coalfields Limited in dismissing Sh. Musafir
Rajbhar, U.M. No. 501745, UG.L. from service w.e.f.
22-8-2003 is legal and justified? If not to what
relief is the workman entitled?”
Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/
225/2005-IR (CM-II) dated 2-8-2006 of the above said
reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour,
New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference
case No. 45 of 2006 was registered on 14-8-06 and
accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue
notices through the registered post to the parties
concerned directing them to appear in the court on the
date fixed and to file their written statements along with
the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support
of their claims. In pursuance of the said order notices by
the registered post were sent to the parties concerned.
On perusal of the case record, it has been found
that the workman Sh.Musafir Rajbhar moved his petition
dated 26-3-13 and submitted that he does not want to
proceed with the case as the Management is ready to
absorb him in service and also prayed for the closure of
the case. Since the workman is not interested to proceed
with the case, the case it closed and accordingly an order
of ‘‘No Dispute Award” is hereby passed.
ORDER
Let an ‘‘Award” be and the same is passed as ‘‘No
Dispute” existing. Send the copies of the order to the
Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for
information and needful. The reference is accordingly
disposed of.
JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 16 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1672-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ lh
,y ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@ Je U;k;ky; vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k
13@2012) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 16&7&2013
dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y&22012@16@2012&vkbZ vkj (lh,e&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 16th July, 2013
S.O. 1672.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Diputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 13/2012)
of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial
dispute between the management of J.K. Nagar Colliery,
M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited, and their workmen
received by the Central Government on 16-7-2013.
[No. L-22012/16/2012-IR(CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT,
ASANSOL
Present: Sri Jayanta Kumar Sen, Presiding Officer
4704
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
REFERENCE No. 13 OF 2012
Parties :
The management of J.K. Nagar Colliery,
Satgram Area, M/s. ECL, Burdwan (WB)
Vs.
Sri D.K. Routh, Branch Jt. Secy. CMC
(HMS), Aradanga, Asansol (W.B.)
Representative :
For the management
:
None
For the union (Workman) :
None
Industry : Coal
State : West Bengal
Dated - 03-04-13
AWARD
In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d)
of Sub-section (1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of
the Industrial Disptues Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),
Government of India through the Ministry of Labour
vide its Order No. L-22012/16/2012-IR(CM-II) dated
29-03-2012 has been pleased to refer the following
dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal.
SCHEDULE
‘‘Whether the action of the management of J.K.
Nagar Colliery in not payment HRA@ 10% of
basic to Sri Jankinath Bouri S/o Late Manohar
Bouri is fair and justified? To what relief the
concrrned workman is entitled?”
Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/
16/2012-IR (CM-II) dated 29-3-2012 of the above said
reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour,
New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference
case No. 13 of 2012 was registered on 19-4-12 and
accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue
notices through the registered post to the parties
concerned directing them to appear in the court on the
date fixed and to file their written statements along with
the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support
of their claims. In pursuance of the said order notices by
the registered post were sent to the parties concerned.
On perusal of the case record, it has been found
that the workman is neither appearing nor taking any
step since long. It seems that the workman is now no
more interested to proceed with the case. Since the
workman is not interested to proceed with the case, the case
it closed and accordingly an order of ‘‘No Dispute
Award” is hereby passed.
ORDER
Let an ‘‘Award” be and the same is passed as ‘‘No
Dispute” existing. Send the copies of the order to the
Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for
information and needful. The reference is accordingly
disposed of.
JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 16 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1673-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ lh
,y ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@ Je U;k;ky; vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k
12@2012) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 16&7&2013
dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y&22012@23@2012&vkbZ vkj (lh,e&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 16th July, 2013
S.O. 1673.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Diputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 12/2012)
of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial
dispute between the management of J.K. Nagar Colliery,
M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited, and their workmen,
received by the Central Government on 16-7-2013.
[No. L-22012/23/2012-IR(CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT,
ASANSOL
Present: Sri Jayanta Kumar Sen, Presiding Officer
REFERENCE No. 12 OF 2012
Parties :
The management of J.K. Nagar Colliery,
Satgram Area, M/s. ECL, Burdwan (WB)
Vs.
Sri D.K. Routh, Branch Jt. Secy. CMC
(HMS), Aradanga, Asansol, Burdwan
(W.B.)
Representative :
For the management
:
None
For the union (Workman) :
None
Industry : Coal
State : West Bengal
Dated - 20-03-13
AWARD
In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d)
of Sub-section (1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of
the Industrial Disptues Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4705
Government of India through the Ministry of Labour
vide its Order No. L-22012/23/2012-IR(CM-II) dated
29-03-2012 has been pleased to refer the following
dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal.
SCHEDULE
‘‘Whether the action of the management of J.K.
Nagar Colliery of M/s. ECL in not payment HRA@
10% of basic to Sri Binoy Roy S/o Late Janki Roy
is fair in fair and justified? To what relief the
concrrned workman is entitled?”
Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/
23/2012-IR (CM-II) dated 29-3-2012 of the above said
reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour,
New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference
cass No. 12 of 2012 was registered on 19-4-12 and
accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue
notices through the registered post to the parties
concerned directing them to appear in the court on the
date fixed and to file their written statements along with
the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support
of their claims. In pursuance of the said order notices by
the registered post were sent to the parties concerned.
On perusal of the case record, it has been found
that Sri D.K. Routh, Branch Jt. Secretary of the Union,
has endorsed that the case may be closed and a ‘‘No
Dispute Award” may be passed as the workman is not
interested to proceed with the case further. Since the
workman is not iterested to proceed with the case, the
case is closed and accordingly an order ‘‘No Dispute
Award” is hereby passed.
ORDER
Let an ‘‘Award” be and the same is passed as ‘‘No
Dispute” existing. Send the copies of the order to the
Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for
information and needful. The reference is accordingly
disposed of.
JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 16 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1674-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ lh ,y
ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@ Je U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k
08@2012) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 16&7&2013
dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y&22012@13@2012&vkbZ vkj (lh,e&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 16th July, 2013
S.O. 1674.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Diputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 08/2012)
of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial
dispute between the management of J.K. Nagar Colliery,
M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited, and their workmen,
received by the Central Government on 16-7-2013.
[No. L-22012/13/2012-IR(CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT,
ASANSOL
Present: Sri Jayanta Kumar Sen, Presiding Officer
REFERENCE No. 08 OF 2012
Parties :
The management of J.K. Nagar Colliery,
Satgram Area, M/s. ECL, Burdwan (WB)
Vs.
Sri D.K. Routh, Branch Jt. Secy. CMC
(HMS), Aradanga, Asansol, Burdwan (W.B.)
Representatives :
For the management
:
None
For the union (Workman) :
None
Industry : Coal
State : West Bengal
Dated - 19-03-13
AWARD
In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d)
of Sub-section (1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of
the Industrial Disptues Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),
Government of India through the Ministry of Labour
vide its Order No. L-22012/13/2012-IR(CM-II) dated
28-03-2012 has been pleased to refer the following
dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal.
SCHEDULE
‘‘Whether the action of the management of J.K.
Nagar Colliery of M/s. ECL in not payment HRA@
10% of basic to Sri Bapi Bouri S/o Late Rabin
Bouri is fair and justified? To what relief the
concrrned workman is entitled?”
Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/
13/2012-IR (CM-II) dated 28-3-2012 of the above said
reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour,
New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference
cass No. 08 of 2012 was registered on 19-4-12 and
4706
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue
notices through the registered post to the parties
concerned directing them to appear in the court on the
date fixed and to file their written statements along with
the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support
of their claims. In pursuance of the said order notices by
the registered post were sent to the parties concerned.
On perusal of the case record, it has been found
that Sri D.K. Routh, Branch Jt. Secretary of the Union,
has endorsed that the case may be closed and a ‘‘No
Dispute Award” may be passed as the workman is not
interested to proceed with the case further. Since the
workman is not interested to proceed with the case, the
case is closed and accordingly an order ‘‘No Dispute
Award” is hereby passed.
ORDER
Let an ‘‘Award” be and the same is passed as ‘‘No
Dispute” existing. Send the copies of the order to the
Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for
information and needful. The reference is accordingly
disposed of.
JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 16 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1675-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ lh ,y
ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@ Je U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k
11@2012) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 16&7&2013
dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y&22012@24@2012&vkbZ vkj (lh,e&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 16th July, 2013
S.O. 1675.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Diputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 11/2012)
of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Asansol now as shown in the Annexure, in the
Industrial dispute between the management of J.K. Nagar
Colliery, M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited, and their
workmen, which was received by the Central Government
on 16-7-2013.
[No. L-22012/24/2012-IR(CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT,
ASANSOL
Present: Sri Jayanta Kumar Sen, Presiding Officer
REFERENCE No. 11 OF 2012
Parties :
The management of J.K. Nagar Colliery,
Satgram Area, M/s. ECL, Burdwan (WB)
Vs.
Sri D.K. Routh, Branch Jt. Secy. CMC
(HMS), Aradanga, Asansol (W.B.)
Representatives :
For the Management
:
None
For the union (Workman) :
None
Industry : Coal
State : West Bengal
Dated - 19-03-13
AWARD
In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d)
of Sub-section (1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of
the Industrial Disptues Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),
Government of India through the Ministry of Labour
vide its Order No. L-22012/24/2012-IR(CM-II) dated
29-03-2012 has been pleased to refer the following
dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal.
SCHEDULE
‘‘Whether the action of the management of J.K.
Nagar Colliery of M/s. ECL in not payment HRA@
10% of basic to Sri Sujal Paul S/o Late Umapada
Paul is fair and justified? To what relief the
concerned workman is entitled?”
Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/
24/2012-IR (CM-II) dated 29-3-2012 of the above said
reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour,
New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference
cass No. 11 of 2012 was registered on 19-4-12 and
accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue
notices through the registered post to the parties
concerned directing them to appear in the court on the
date fixed and to file their written statements along with
the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support
of their claims. In pursuance of the said order notices by
the registered post were sent to the parties concerned.
On perusal of the case record, it has been found
that Sri D.K. Routh, Branch Jt. Secretary of the Union,
has endorsed that the case may be closed and a ‘‘No
Dispute Award” may be passed as the workman is not
interested to proceed with the case further. Since the
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4707
workman is not iterested to proceed with the case, the
case is closed and accordingly an order ‘‘No Dispute
Award” is hereby passed.
ORDER
Let an ‘‘Award” be and the same is passed as ‘‘No
Dispute” existing. Send the copies of the order to the
Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for
information and needful. The reference is accordingly
disposed of.
JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 16 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1676-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ lh ,y
ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@ Je U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k
4@2003) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 16&7&2013
dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y&22012@336@2001&vkbZ vkj (lh,e&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 16th July, 2013
S.O. 1676.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Diputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 04/2003)
of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial
dispute between the management of Jhanjra M.I.C. M/s.
Eastern Coalfields Limited, and their workmen received
by the Central Government on 16-7-2013.
[No. L-22012/336/2001-IR(CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT,
ASANSOL
Present: Sri Jayanta Kumar Sen, Presiding Officer
REFERENCE No. 04 OF 2003
Parties :
The management of Jhanjra M.I.C. M/s.
ECL, Burdwan (WB)
Vs.
The President UCMU (INTUC), Ukhra
Burdwan (W.B.)
Representatives :
For the management
:
Sri P.K. Das, Ld.
Repesentative
For the union (Workman) :
None
Industry : Coal
State : West Bengal
Dated - 26-03-13
AWARD
In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d)
of Sub-section (1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of
the Industrial Disptues Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),
Government of India through the Ministry of Labour
vide its Order No. L-22012/336/2001-IR(CM-II) dated
11-02-2003 has been pleased to refer the following
dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal.
SCHEDULE
‘‘Whether the action of the management of Jhanjra
M.I.C. M/s. Eastern Coalfields Ltd. in not providing
employment to Smt. Rani Majhi, dependent of
Late Samar Majhi is legal and justified? If not, to
what relief is the said dependent of the workman
entitled?”
Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/
336/2001-IR (CM-II) dated 11-2-2003 of the above said
reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour,
New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference
case No. 04 of 2003 was registered on 11-3-03 and
accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue
notices through the registered post to the parties
concerned directing them to appear in the court on the
date fixed and to file their written statements along with
the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support
of their claims. In pursuance of the said order notices by
the registered post were sent to the parties concerned.
On perusal of the case record, it has been found
that the workman is neither appearing nor taking any
step since long. It seems that the workman has now no
more interest in this case. The case is also too old-
2003. Since the workman is not iterested to proceed
with the case, the case is closed and accordingly an
order of ‘‘No Dispute Award” is hereby passed.
ORDER
Let an ‘‘Award” be and the same is passed as ‘‘No
Dispute” existing. Send the copies of the order to the
Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for
information and needful. The reference is accordingly
disposed of.
JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer
4708
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ubZ fnYyh] 16 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1677-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ lh ,y
ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@ Je U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k
07@2012) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 16&7&2013
dks çkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y&22012@14@2012&vkbZ vkj (lh,e&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 16th July, 2013
S.O. 1677.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Diputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 07/2012)
of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial
dispute between the management of J.K. Nagar Colliery,
M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited, and their workmen
received by the Central Government on 16-7-2013.
[No. L-22012/14/2012-IR(CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT,
ASANSOL
Present: Sri Jayanta Kumar Sen, Presiding Officer
Reference No. 07 of 2012
Parties :
The management of Jhanjra Nagar Colleiry
M/s. ECL, Burdwan (WB)
Vs.
Sri D.K. Routh, Branch Jt. Secy.
CMC(HMS), Aradanga, Asansol, Burdwan
(W.B.)
Representatives :
For the management
:
None
For the union (Workman) :
None
Industry : Coal
State : West Bengal
Dated - 19-03-13
AWARD
In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d)
of Sub-section (1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of
the Industrial Disptues Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),
Government of India through the Ministry of Labour
vide its Order No. L-22012/14/2012-IR(CM-II) dated
29-7-2012 has been pleased to refer the following
dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal.
SCHEDULE
‘‘Whether the action of the management of J.K.
Nagar Colliery of M/s. ECL in not paying HRA @
10% of basic to Sri Jalandhar Rajbhar S/o Late
Chikuri Rajbhar is fair and justified? To what relief
the concerned workman is entitled?”
Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/
14/2012-IR (CM-II) dated 29-3-2012 of the above-said
reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour,
New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference
case No. 07 of 2012 was registered on 19-4-12 and
accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue
notices through the registered post to the parties
concerned directing them to appear in the court on the
date fixed and to file their written statements along with
the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support
of their claims. In pursuance of the said order notices by
the registered post were sent to the parties concerned.
On perusal of the case record, it has been found
that Sri D.K. Routh Branch Jt. Secretary of the Union,
has endorsed that the case may be closed and a ‘‘No
Dispute Award” may be passed as the workman is not
interested to proceed with the case further. Since the
workman is not interested to proceed wtih the case, the
the case is closed and accordingly an order of ‘‘No
Dispute Award” is hereby passed.
ORDER
Let an ‘‘Award” be and the same is passed as ‘‘No
Dispute” existing. Send the copies of the order to the
Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for
information and needful. The reference is accordingly
disposed of.
JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 16 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1678-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ lh
,y ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vklulsky ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k
50@1995) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 16&07&2013
dks izkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y& 22012@65@1995&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4709
New Delhi, the 16th July, 2013
S.O.
1678.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947) the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 50/1995)
of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Asansol now as shown in the Annexure in the
Industrial Dispute between the management of Parbelia
Colliery, M/s. E.C. Ltd. and their workmen, received by
the Central Government on 16-07-2013.
[No. L-22012/65/1995-IR(CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM-LABOUR COURT,
ASANSOL
Present :
Sri Jayanta Kumar Sen,
Presiding Officer
Reference No. 50 of 1995
Parties :
The management of Parbelia Colliery,
M/s. ECL, Purulia (W.B.)
Vs.
The Gen. Secy., W.B.K.M.S.(UTUC),
Sitarampur, Burdwan (W.B.)
Representatives :
For the management :
Sri P. K. Das, Ld.
Representative
For the union (Workman) :
None
Industry : Coal
State : West Bengal
Dated the 19th March, 2013
AWARD
In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-
Section(1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947), Govt. of India
through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L-22012/
65/95-I.R.(CM-II) dated 21-09-1995 has been pleased to
refer the following dispute for adjudication by this
Tribunal.
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of Parbelia
Colliery of M/s. E.C. Ltd., in not sending Sh. Bimal
Majhee, Pump Khalasi to age determination
Committee for determination of his correct age is
justified ? If not, to what relief is the workman is
entitlted to ?”
Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/65/
95-I.R (CM-II) dated 21-09-1995 of the above said reference
from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for
adjudication of the dispute, a reference case No. 50 of
1995 was registered on 05-10-95 and accordingly, an order
to that effect was passed to issue notices through the
registered post to the parties concerned directing them to
appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their written
statements along with the relevant documents and a list
of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance of
the said order notices by the registered post were sent to
the parties concerned.
On perusal of the case record, it has been found that
the workman is neither appearing nor taking any step since
1997. It seems that the workman has now no more interest
in this case. The case is also too old in the year of 1995.
Since the workman is not interested to proceed with the
case, the case is closed and accordingly an order of “No
Dispute Award” is hereby passed.
ORDER
Let an “Award” be and the same is passed as “No
Dispute” existing. Send the copies of the order to the Govt.
of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for information
and needful. The reference is accordingly disposed of.
JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 16 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1679-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ lh
,y ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vklulsky ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k
06@2012) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 16&07&2013
dks izkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y& 22012@15@2012&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 16th July, 2013
S.O.
1679.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947) the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No.06/2012)
of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial
Dispute between the management of J.K. Nagar Colliery,
M/s. E.C. Ltd., and their workman, received by the Central
Government on 16-07-2013.
[No. L-22012/15/2012-IR(CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
4710
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM-LABOUR COURT,
ASANSOL
Present :
Sri Jayanta Kumar Sen,
Presiding Officer
Reference No. 06 of 2012
Parties :
The management of J. K. Nagar
Colliery, M/s. ECL, Burdwan (W.B.)
Vs.
The Sri D. K. Routh, Branch Secy.,
CMC(HMS), Burdwan (W.B.)
Representatives :
For the management :
None
For the Union (Workman) :
None
Industry : Coal
State : West Bengal
Dated, the 13th March, 2013
AWARD
In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-
section(1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947), Govt. of India
through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L-22012/
15/2012-I.R.(CM-II) dated 29-03-2012 has been pleased to
refer the following dispute for adjudication by this
Tribunal.
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of J. K.
Nagar Colliery of M/s. ECL in not paying HRA @
10% of basic to Sri Ramu Ruidas S/o Late Habul
Ruidas is fair and justified ? To what relief the
concerned workman is entitled to?”
Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/15/
2012-IR (CM-II) dated 29-03-2012 of the abovesaid
reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New
Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference case No.
06 of 2012 was registered on 19-04-12 and accordingly an
order to that effect was passed to issue notices through
the registered post to the parties concerned directing them
to appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their
written statements along with the relevant documents and
a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance
of the said order notices by the registered post were sent
to the parties concerned.
On perusal of the case record, it has been found that
Sri D. K. Routh, Branch Joint Secretary of the union, has
endorsed that the case may be closed and no dispute
award may be passed as the workman is now no more
interested to proceed with the case any further. Since the
workman is no more interested to proceed with the case,
the case is closed and accordingly an order of “No Dispute
Award” is hereby passed.
ORDER
Let an “Award” be and the same is passed as “No
Dispute” existing. Send the copies of the order of the Govt.
of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for information
and needful. The reference is accordingly disposed of.
JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 16 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1680-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ lh
,y ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k
10@2012) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 16&07&2013
dks izkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y& 22012@11@2012&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 16th July, 2013
S.O. 1680.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 10/2012)
of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial
Dispute between the management of J.K. Nagar Colliery,
M/s. E.C. Ltd., and their workmen, received by the Central
Government on 16-07-2013.
[No. L-22012/11/2012-IR(CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM-LABOUR COURT,
ASANSOL
Present :
Sri Jayanta Kumar Sen,
Presiding Officer
Reference No. 10 of 2012
Parties :
The management of J. K. Nagar
Colliery, M/s. ECL, Burdwan (W.B.)
Vs.
The Branch Secy., CMC(HMS),
Aradanga, Asansol (W.B.)
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4711
Representatives :
For the management :
Sri P. K. Goswami,
Ld. Advocate
For the Union (Workman) :
D. K. Routh, Ld.
Representative
Industry : Coal
State : West Bengal
Dated, the 14th March, 2013
AWARD
In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-
section(1) and sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947), Govt. of India
through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L-22012/
11/2012-IR(CM-II) dated 28-03-2012 has been pleased to
refer the following dispute for adjudication by this
Tribunal.
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of J. K.
Nagar Colliery of M/s. ECL in not paying HRA @
10% of basic to Sri Balmiki Ram is fair and
justified ? To what relief the concerned workman is
entitled to ?”
Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/11/
2012-I.R (CM-II) dated 28-03-2012 of the abovesaid
reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New
Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference case
No. 10 of 2012 was registered on 19-04-12 and accordingly
an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through
the registered post to the parties concerned directing them
to appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their
written statements along with the relevant documents and
a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance
of the said order notices by the registered post were sent
to the parties concerned.
On perusal of the case record, it has been found that
Sri D. K. Routh, Branch Secretary of the union, appears
and prayed for the closure of the case as the workman is
not interested to proceed with the case any further. Since
the workman is not interested to proceed with the case,
the case is closed and accordingly an order of “No Dispute
Award” is hereby passed.
ORDER
Let an “Award” be and the same is passed as “No
Dispute” existing. Send the copies of the order of the Govt.
of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for information
and needful. The reference is accordingly disposed of.
JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 16 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1681-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ lh
,y ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vklulsky ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k
51@1993) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 16&07&2013
dks izkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y& 22012@281@1993&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 16th July, 2013
S.O.
1681.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947) the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 51/1993)
of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial
Dispute between the management of M/s. E.C. Ltd., and
their workmen, received by the Central Government on
16-07-2013.
[No. L-22012/281/1993-IR(CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM-LABOUR COURT,
ASANSOL
Present : Sri Jayanta Kumar Sen, Presiding Officer
Reference No. 51 of 1993
Parties :
The management of Shyamsundarpur Colliery, M/s.
ECL, Burdwan(WB)
Vs.
The Working President, CMU, Ukhra, Burdwan
(W.B.)
Representatives :
For the management :
Sri P. K. Das, Ld.
Advocate
For the union (Workman) :
None
Industry : Coal
State : West Bengal
Dated, the 14th March, 2013
AWARD
In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-
section(1) and sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947), Govt. of India
through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L-22012/
281/93-IR(CM-II) dated 16-02-93 has been pleased to refer
the following dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal.
4712
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
SCHEDULE
‘‘Whether the action of the management of
Shyamsundarpur Colliery, Bankola Area, M/s. ECL,
PO: Ukhra, Distt. Burdwan in dismissing Shri Suku
Majhi, UG Loader in the Shyamsundarpur Colliery
vide their letter No. BA/PD/Dis/1786 dated 27-5-91
is justified? If not, to what relief the workman is
entitled to?’’
Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/
281/93-IR (CM-II) dated 16-2-93 of the above said reference
from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for
adjudication of the dispute, a reference case No. 51 of
1993 was registered on 23.12.93 and accordingly an order
to that effect was passed to issue notices through the
registered post to the parties concerned directing them to
appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their written
statements along with the relevant documents and a list
of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance of
the said order notices by the registered post were sent to
the parties concerned.
On perusal of the case record, it has been found that
the workman is neither appearing nor taking any step since
1ong. It seems that the workman is now no more interested
to proceed with the case any further. The case is also too
old- 1993. Since the workman is not interested to proceed
with the case, the case is closed and accordingly an order
of "No Dispute Award" is hereby passed.
ORDER
Let an "Award" be and the same is passed as "No
Dispute" existing. Send the copies of the order to the Govt.
of India, Ministry of Labour,' New Delhi for information
and needful. The reference is accordingly disposed of.
JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 16 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1682-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ lh
,y ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky; vklulsky ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 73@2000)
dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 16&07&2013 dks
izkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y& 22012@41@2000&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 16th July, 2013
S.O.
1682.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947) the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 73/2000)
of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial
Dispute between the management of M/s. E.C. Ltd., and
their workman, which was received by the Central
Government on 16-07-2013.
[No. L-22012/41/2000-IR(CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
ASANSOL
Present : Sri Jayanta Kumar Sen, Presiding Officer
Reference No. 73 of 2000
Parties :
The management of Bahula Colliery, M/s., ECL,
Burdwan (WB)
Vs.
The Gen. Secy., UCMU(INTUC), Ukhra, Burdwan
(W.B.)
Representatives :
For the management :
Sri P. K. Goswami,
Ld. Advocate
For the union (Workman) :
None
Industry : Coal
State : West Bengal
Dated 13th March, 2013
AWARD
In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-
section(1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947), Govt. of India
through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L-22012/
41/2000-IR(CM-II) dated -4-8-2000 has been pleased to
refer the following dispute for adjudication by this
Tribunal.
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of Bahula
Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Ltd. in not
regularising Sh. Moloy Kumar Banerjee, Mining
Helper as Cap Lamp Issue Clerk w.e.f. 1991 is legal
and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is
entitled?"
Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/41/
2000-IR (CM-II) dated 4-8-2000 of the above said reference
from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for
adjudication of the dispute, a reference case No. 73 of
2000 was registered on 6-9-2000 and accordingly an order
to that effect was passed to issue notices through the
registered post to the parties concerned directing them to
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4713
appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their written
statements along with the relevant documents and a list
of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance of
the said order notices by the registered post were sent to
the parties concerned.
On perusal of the case record, it has been found that
the workman is neither appearing nor taking any step since
long. It seems that the workman has lost his interest to
proceed with the case any further. Since the workman is
no more interested to proceed with the case, the case is
closed and accordingly an order of "No Dispute Award"
is hereby passed.
ORDER
Let an "Award" be and the same is passed as "No
Dispute" existing. Send the copies of the order to the Govt.
of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for information
and needful. The reference is accordingly disposed of.
JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 16 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1683-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ lh
,y ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vklulsky ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k
148@1999) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks
16&07&2013 dks izkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y& 22012@88@1999&vkbZ- vkj- (lh,e&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 16th July, 2013
S.O. 1683.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 148/1999)
of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Asansol now as shown in the Annexure in the
Industrial Dispute between the management of M/s. E.C.
Ltd., and their workman, which was received by the Central
Government on 16-07-2013.
[No. L-22012/88/1999-IR(CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
ASANSOL
Present : Sri Jayanta Kumar Sen, Presiding Officer
Reference No. 148 of 1999
Parties :
The management of Lachipur Colliery, M/s. ECL,
Burdwan(WB)
Vs.
The Asst. Gen. Secy., KMC, Asansol (W.B.)
Representatives :
For the Management :
None
For the Union (Workman) :
None
Industry : Coal
State : West Bengal
Dated 20-2 2013
AWARD
In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-
section(1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947), Govt. of India
through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L-22012/
88/99-IR (CM-II) dated 31-8-1999 has been pleased to refer
the following dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal.
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of Lachipur
Colliery of M/s. ECL in forcefully superannuating
Sh. Durja Dakua, Wagon Loader from 1-7-88 and
subsequently allowing him in duty on 23-7-89 and
not paying the wages for the period of forced
idleness from 1-7-88 to 23-7-89 is legal and justified?
If not, to what relief the workman is entitled?"
Having received the Order of Letter No.L-22012/88/
99-IR (CM-II) dated 31-8-1999 of the above said reference
from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for
adjudication of the dispute, a reference case No. 148 of
1999 was registered on 14-9-99 and accordingly an order
to that effect was passed to issue notices through the
registered post to the parties concerned directing them to
appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their written
statements along with the relevant documents and a list
of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance of
the said order notices by the registered post were sent to
the parties concerned.
On perusal of the case record, it has been found that
the Union is neither appearing nor taking any step after
16.02.2006 despite registered notices. Several opportunities
were given but of no effect. It seems that the workman is
now no more interested to proceed with the case further.
Since the Union does not want to proceed with the case
further, the case is closed and accordingly an order of "No
Dispute Award" is hereby passed.
ORDER
Let an "Award" be and the same is passed as "No
Dispute" existing. Send the copies of the order to the Govt.
4714
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for information
and needful. The reference is accordingly disposed of.
JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 16 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1684-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj eSllZ ch lh
lh ,y ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds
chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vklulsky ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k
37@1993) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 16&07&2013
dks izkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y& 22012@118@1993&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º
ch- ,e- iVuk;d] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 16th July, 2013
S.O. 1684.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 37/1993)
of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Asansol now as shown in the Annexure in the
Industrial Dispute between the management of M/s. BCCL
and their workman, which was received by the Central
Government on 16-07-2013.
[No. L-22012/118/1993-IR(CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
ASANSOL
Present : Sri Jayanta Kumar Sen, Presiding Officer
Reference No. 37 of 1993
Parties :
The management of, Ropeway, B.B. Camp, M/s.
BCCL, Dhanbad(Jharkhand)
Vs.
The Gen. Secy., CREU, Purulia (W.B.)
Representatives :
For the management :
None
For the union (Workman) :
None
Industry : Coal
State : Jharkhand
Dated 21-2 2013
AWARD
In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-
section(1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947), Govt. of India
through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L-22012/
118/93-IR (CM-II) dated 17-8-1993 has been pleased to
refer the following dispute for adjudication by this
Tribunal.
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of Central
Ropeways, B.B. Camp, in not paying the wages to
Shri Kalachand Bouri for the period from 22-8-90 to
23-12-90 and to Narayan Kumar, Kamdeb Bouri and
Nando Kumbhakar for the period from 11-9-90 to
23-12-90 is justified ? If not, to what relief is the
concerned workmen entitled to?"
Having received the Order of Letter No. L-22012/
118/93-IR (CM-II) dated 17-8-1993 of the above said
reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New
Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference case No.
37 of 1993 was registered on 23-8-93 and accordingly an
order to that effect was passed to issue notices through
the registered post to the parties concerned directing them
to appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their
written statements along with the relevant documents and
a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance
of the said order notices by the registered post were sent
to the parties concerned.
On perusal of the case record, it has been found that
the Union is neither appearing nor taking any step since
long despite registered notices. Several opportunities were
given but of no effect. It seems that the workman is now
no more interested to proceed with the case further. Since
the case is too old-1993, the case is closed and accordingly
an order of "No Dispute Award" is hereby passed.
ORDER
Let an "Award" be and the same is passed as "No
Dispute" existing. Send the copies of the order to the Govt.
of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for information
and needful. The reference is accordingly disposed of.
JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 17 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1685-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj ueZnk ekyok
xzkeh.k cSad ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds
chp] vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky; tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 78@93)
dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 12&07&2013 dks
izkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y& 12012@30@93&vkbZvkj (ch&I)º
lqefr ldykuh] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4715
New Delhi, the 17th July, 2013
S.O. 1685.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947) the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No.78/93)
of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial
Dispute between the management of Narmada Malwa
Gramin Bank and their workmen, received by the Central
Government on 12-07-2013.
[No. L-12012/30/93-IR(B-I)]
SUMATI SAKLANI, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT,
JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/78/93
PRESIDING OFFICER : SHRI R. B. PATLE
Shri Prem Narayin,
S/o Shri Balaram Raikwar,
205, Laxmi Nagar Colony,
Ujjain
...Workman
Versus
The President,
Narmada Malwa Gramin Bank,
Dashhara Maidan,
Ujjain
... Management
AWARD
Passed on this 10th day of June, 2013
1. As per letter dated 7-4-1993 by the Government of
India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi the reference is
received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under
Section -10 of I. D. Act, 1947 as per Notification No. L-
12012/30/93-IR(B-I) . The dispute under reference relates
to :
" Whether the action of the management of Indore
Ujjain Kshetriya Gramin Bank in not regularizing the
services of Shri Prem Narain Balaram is justified? If
not, to what relief the workman is entitled to and
from which date?"
2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to
the parties. 1st party workman submitted his statement of
claim at Page 2/1 to 2/3. The case of 1st party workman is
that he was working with IInd party as messenger from
1986 to 1991. Again after gap of one month, continuously
worked till year 1994. His services were terminated after he
had approached Labour Officer, Indore. 1st party claims
that he was continuously working for 5 years he was dong
work of scavenging, distribution of letters, filling water,
movements of files, stationery etc. That he had completed
240 days continuous service during each of the year.
3. IInd party submitted Written Statement at Page
7/1 to 7/4. It is submitted by IInd party that the rural banks
were established as per act of 1976. 1st party workman
was engaged as per exigency of work. He had never
completed 90 days of service in a calendar year or 240
days continuous service during any of the year. That
services of 1st party were engaged when regular employee
used to remain absent. That services of 34 casual
employees were regularized as per settlement before ALC,
Indore. The name of 1st party was not appearing in it. IInd
party further contented that the reference is not legal,
there is no industrial dispute and therefore reference
deserves to be rejected.
4. Ist party filed rejoinder at Page 8/1 to 8/3. He has
reiterated his earlier pledings that he was working as
messenger during leave vacancy. That he has
continuously worked for 3 years with IInd party. He had
completed 240 days service during each of the calendar
year. That his services were termmated illegally.
5. Considering pleadings on record, the points
which arise for my consideration and determination are as
under. My findings are recorded against each of them for
the reasons as below :-
(i) Whether the action of the —
In Affirmative
management of Indore
Ujjain Kshetriya Gramin
Bank in not regularizing
the services of Shri Prem
Narain Balaram is justified?
(ii) If so, to what relief the
—
Relief prayed by
workman is entitled to?"
workman is rejected.
REASONS
6. 1st party workman is claiming for reinstatement. It
is submitted that he was continuously working for a period
of 3 years and then terminated whereas the terms of
reference deals with whether the action of the management
in not regularizing services of 1st party workman is legal.
1st party workman filed affidavit of his evidence at Page
19/1 to 19/2. In his evidence, he has stated that he was
continuously working as messenger with Ilnd party from
February, 1988 to May, 1991. He had completed 240 days
continuous work during each of the year. That he was
doing different works of messenger. In his cross-
examination, workman says he was engaged on daily
wages. He knows one Gajanand Sharma. At the time of his
evidence, he was not working in the Ilnd party. He was
discontinued from work from 1992. He denied that he was
engaged by Bank as per exigency of work.
4716
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 10, 2013/SRAVANA 19, 1935
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
7. Management filed affidavit of evidence of witness
Shri Devi Singh Nayak . The said witness has stated that
1st party was engaged for cleaning work as per exigency.
He was paid wages for petty works. That 1st party is
claiming regularization without following recruitment rules.
The evidence of management's witness remained
unchallenged as 1st party workman failed to cross-examine
the said witness.
8. After the evidence was closed, case was fixed for
argument on 13-11-11, 11-4-2012, 5-10-12 but paties
remained absent. On, 12-4-13, the parties remamed absent,
notice was directed to be issued. It appears that no notice
was issued to the parties. However, both parties remained
absent from 29-5-2013. The conduct of parties shows that
they did not show interest in argument of the matter. The
pleadings and evidence of 1st party doesnot show that he
was continuously working with the IInd party. His
appointment was not made following recruitment process.
The unchallenged evidence of management's witness is
on the point that 1st party workman was engaged as per
exigency of work without following recruitment rules. The
evidence discussed above does not establish claim of 1st
party for regularization of service. For above reasons, I
answer Point No.1 in Affirmative.
9. Point No. 2- In view of my finding on Point No.1,
as 1st party are not appointed after following procedure
for recruitment rather unchallenged evidence of
management's witness that the services of 1st party were
engaged as per exigency of work. The workman is not
entitled to regularization. The relief prayed by workman is
rejected.
10. Accordingly award is passed as under :—
(1) The action of the IInd party management in not
regularizing the services of 1st party Shri Prem Narain
Balaram is justified.
(2) Relief prayed by workman is rejected.
R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 17 tqykbZ] 2013
dk-vk- 1686-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947
dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUæh; ljdkj Hkkjrh; LVsV
cSad ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]
vuqca/ esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUæh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 19@98)
dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUæh; ljdkj dks 12&07&2013 dks
izkIr gqvk Fkk A
¹la- ,y& 12012@109@97&vkbZvkj (ch&I)º
lqefr ldykuh] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, 17th July, 2013
S.O. 1686.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947) the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No.19/98)
of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial
Dispute between the management of State Bank of India
and their workmen, received by the Central Government
on 12-07-2013.
[No. L-12012/109/97-IR(B-I)]
SUMATI SAKLANI, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM - LABOUR COURT,
JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/19/98
Presiding Officer : SHRI R.B.PATLE
Shri Ramadhar Parganiha,
S/o Bisru Ram Parganiha,
Block No. 29/1 /H,
Risali Sector,
Bhilai, Distt. Durg (MP)
...Workman
Versus
Regional Manager,
State Bank of India,
Region-III, Shankar Nagar,
Raipur (MP)
...Management
AWARD
Passed on this 24th day of June, 2013
1. As per letter dated 21-1-98 by the Government of
India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is
received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under
Section -10 of I. D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No. L-
12012/l09/97-IR(B-I). The dispute under reference relates
to :
" Whether the action of the management of State
Bank of India, through Regional Manager, Region-
III, Raipur in relation to their Sector-I, Bhilai Branch
in refusing employment to Shri Ramadhar Parganiha,
waterman w.e. f. 29-10-95 is lawful and justified? If
not, to what relief is the workman entitled to?"
2. After receiving reference notices were issued to
the parties. Statement of claim is submitted, by workman
at Page 6/1 to 6/4. It is case of 1st party workman that he
was appointed on 1-7-95 on permanent post of waterman.
He was continuously working with IInd party till
20-10-95. His services were orally terminated on 28-8-95.
That in Conciliation proceedings, IInd party had admitted
¹Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 10] [email protected] 19] 1935
4717
that workman was paid wages Rs. 20 per day. That
workman claims that he had continuously worked for 480
days. His services were discontinued without paying
retrenchment compensation, without notice in violation
of Section 25-F of I.D.Act. That junior employees
Mr. Tondon was continued as waterman. Termination of
his services is illegal. Rule 76, 77 of I.D. Act was not
complied Principles of last come 1st go was not followed.
On such grounds, workman is praying for his reinstatement
with consequential benefits.
3. IInd party filed Written Statement at Page 9/1 to
9/3. IInd party denied that workman was appointed on
permanent vacant post of waterman from 1-7-94 to 28-10-
95. It is submitted that applicant was engaged as temporary
employee due to exigencies. He was paid Rs. 20 to 25as
part time worker. That workman was not in continuous
service. He was working as per the terms of contract. That
services are not terminated in violation of provisions of
I.D. Act. That workman is not covered as defined under
I.D. Act. He was not appointed on permanent post. IInd
party prays for rejection of claim of workman.
4. Considering pleadings on record, the points
which arise for my consideration and determination are as
under. My findings are recorded against each of them for
the reasons as below :—
(i) “Whether the action of the
In Affirmative
management of State Bank of
India, through Regional
Manager, Region-III, Raipur
in relation to their Sector-I,
Bhilai Branch in refusing
employment to Shri Ramadhar
Parganiha, waterman w.e.f.
29-10-95 is legal ?
(ii) If so, to what relief the
Relief prayed by
workman is entitled to?"
workman is rejected.
REASONS
5. Though workman challenged termination of his
services from 29-10-95, he has failed to adduce evidence
in support of his claim. Workman was proceeded ex parte
on 18-1-95. Management filed affidavit of its witness Shri
Jayant Bhardwaj. He has stated in his affidavit that the
workman was not engaged against permanent vacant post.
Workman was engaged on daily wage basis as per
exigency of work. He was feed to come on next day for his
work. The management was at liberty not engaging him
on next date. That Branch Manager working at various
branches has no authority to appoint any subordinate
staff on regular basis, however, they are authorized to
appoint person on daily wages depending upon exigency
of work. That workman has not worked for 240 days in any
calendar year. He is not entitled to retrenchment
compensation. That there is no relationship of master and
employee. The evidence of management's witness
remained unchallenged as workman failed to cross-examine
the witness of the management.
6. Considering unchallenged evidence of
management's witness and the workman has not adduced
any evidence in support of his claim, it cannot be said that
the action of the management is legal. For above reasons,
I record my finding in Point No.1 in Affirmative.
7. In the result, award is passed as under :—
1. The action of the management of State Bank of
India, through Regional Manager, Region-III, Raipur
in relation to their Sector- I, Bhilai Branch in refusing
employment to Shri Ramadhar Parganiha, waterman
w.e.f. 29-10-95 is legal.
2. Relief prayed by workman is rejected.
R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer
Printed by the Manager, Government of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi-110064
and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi-110054.