2461 GI/2016

(2271)

jftLVªh la- Mh- ,y- (,u) 04@0007@2003µ05

REGD. NO. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05

izkf/dkj ls izdkf'kr

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

lkIrkfgd

WEEKLY

la- 22]

ubZ fnYyh] ebZ 22—ebZ 28] 2016] 'kfuokj@T;s"B 1— T;s"B 7] 1938

No. 22]

NEW DELHI, MAY 22—MAY 28, 2016, SATURDAY/JYAISTHA 1— JYAISTHA 7, 1938

bl Hkkx esa fHkUu i`"B la[;k nh tkrh gS ftlls fd ;g i`Fkd ladyu ds :i esa j[kk tk lds

Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

Hkkx II—[k.M 3—mi&[k.M (ii)

PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)

Hkkjr ljdkj ds ea=kky;ksa (j{kk ea=kky; dks NksM+dj) }kjk tkjh fd, x, lkafof/d vkns'k vkSj vf/lwpuk,a

Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India

(Other than the Ministry of Defence)

गृह मंालय

नई द ली, 18 मई, 2016

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 1020

1020

1020

1020.—के ीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासकय योजन के िलए योग) िनयम, 1976 (यथा

संशोिधत 1987) के िनयम 10 के उप-िनयम (4) के अनुसरण म%, गृह मं(ालय के िन) निलिखत काया,लय म% िह दी का

काय,साधक .ान रखने वाले कम,चा1रय क सं2 या 80 ितशत से अिधक हो जाने के फल4 व5प इन काया,लय को एत8ारा

अिधसूिचत करती है:-

1.

1.

1.

1.

के ी

के ी

के ी

के ीय रजव पुिलस बल

य रजव पुिलस बल

य रजव पुिलस बल

य रजव पुिलस बल

1. पुिलस उप महािनरी:क ितिव ोिहता एवं आतंकवाद िवरोधी 4 कूल, के ीय 1रजव, पुिलस बल, िशवपुरी (म> य

देश)

2. काया,लय पुिलस उप महािनरी:क/ाचाय, रंग5ट िश:ण के , के ीय 1रजव, पुिलस बल, अमेठी (उB तर देश)

2.

2.

2.

2.

के ी

के ी

के ी

के ीय औोिगक सुरा बल

य औोिगक सुरा बल

य औोिगक सुरा बल

य औोिगक सुरा बल

1. केऔसुब समूह खदान बोलानी (ओिडशा)

2. केऔसुब इकाई जीओएम गुआ (झारखंड)

2272

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

3. केऔसुब इकाई आरआईएल जामनगर (गुजरात)

4. केऔसुब डीओएस मु2 यालय, ब%गलु5 (कना,टक)

5. केऔसुब इकाई भा.िव.िन. कलपाG कम (तिमलनाडु)

6. केऔसुब 6वH आरि:त वािहनी देवली (राज4 थान)

7. केऔसुब इकाई आरजीआईए, एएसजी हैदराबाद (आंK देश)

8. केऔसुब इकाई केकेएनपीपी कुडनकुलम (तिमलनाडु)

9. केऔसुब इकाई एसएमपीएल राजकोट (गुजरात)

10. केऔसुब आईपीआरसी महे िगरी (तिमलनाडु)

11. केऔसुब इकाई सीसीएल एनके एवं िपपरवार, रांची (झारखंड)

3.

3.

3.

3.

भारत

भारत

भारत

भारत-ित ब

ित ब

ित ब

ित बत सीमा पुिलस

त सीमा पुिलस

त सीमा पुिलस

त सीमा पुिलस

1. 47वH वािहनी भा. ित. सी. पुिलस बल, िजला सा) बा (ज) मू व कL मीर)

2. 51वH वािहनी भा. ित. सी. पुिलस बल, प1टयाला (पंजाब)

3. 52वH वािहनी भा. ित. सी. पुिलस बल, भोपाल (म> य देश)

4. 53वH वािहनी भा. ित. सी. पुिलस बल, िजला-िचB तूर (आंK देश)

5. 55वH वािहनी भा. ित. सी. पुिलस बल, िजला-लोअर दवांग वैली (अOणाचल देश)

6. 56वH वािहनी भा. ित. सी. पुिलस बल, िजला-खुदा, (ओिडशा)

7. :े. मु. (ब%गलुO/ए. एन. ओ) वािहनी भा. ित. सी. पुिलस बल, ब%गलुO (कना,टक)

8. आर. टी. सी. वािहनी भा. ित. सी. पुिलस बल, िजला: िशवगंगई (तिमलनाडु)

[सं. 12017/01/2012-िह दी]

राकेश कुमार, संयुG त िनदेशक (राजभाषा)

MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS

New Delhi , the 18th May, 2016

S.O. 1020.—In pursuance of sub rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (Use for official purposes of the

Union) Rules, 1976 (as amended in 1987), the Central Government hereby notifies the following office of the Ministry

of Home Affairs, wherein the percentage of the staff, having working knowledge of Hindi has gone above 80%.

1. Central Reserve Police Force

i)

Office of Dy. Inspector General of Police, Counter Insurgency and Anti Terrorism School, Central

Reserve Police Force, Shivpuri (M.P.)

ii)

Office of Dy. Inspector General of Police/Principal, Recruits Training Center, Central Reserve Police

Force, Amethi (U.P.)

2. Central Industrial Security Force

(i)

CISF Group, Mines Bolani (Odisha)

(ii)

CISF Unit, GOM Gua (Jharkhand)

(iii)

CISF Unit, RIL Jamnagar (Gujrat)

(iv)

CISF DOS HQrs., Bangalore (Karnatak)

(v)

CISF Unit BVN Kalpakkam (Tamil Nadu)

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938

2273

(vi)

CISF 6th Res. Bn. Deoli (Rajasthan)

(vii)

CISF Unit RGIA, ASG Hyderbad (Andra Pradesh)

(viii)

CISF Unit, KKNPP Koodankulam (Tamil Nadu)

(ix)

CISF Unit, SMPL Rajkot (Gujrat)

(x)

CISF Unit, IPRC Mehendragiri (Tamil Nadu)

(xi)

CISF Unit, CCL NK & Piparwar, Ranchi (Jharkhand)

3. Indo-Tibetan Border Police

(i)

47th Battalion I.T.B.P., Distt- Sambha (J&K)

(ii)

51st Battalion I.T.B.P, Patiala (Punjab)

(iii)

52nd Battalion I.T.B.P, Bhopal (Madhya Pradesh)

(iv)

53rd Battalion I.T.B.P, Chittoor (Andra Pradesh)

(v)

55th Battalion I.T.B.P, Distt-Lower Dibang Valley (Arunachal Pradesh)

(vi)

56th Battalion I.T.B.P, Distt-Khordha (Odisha)

(vii)

Regional Hqrs. (Bangaluru/ ANO), I.T.B.P, Bangaluru (Karnatak)

(viii)

RTC, I.T.B.P, Distt-Shivgangai

[No. 12017/01/2012-Hindi]

RAKESH KUMAR, Jt. Director (OL)

fons'k ea=kky;

(lh-ih-oh- izHkkx)

ubZ fnYyh] 17 ebZ] 2016

dk-vk- 1021-—jktuf;d vkSj dksalqyh; vf/dkjh ('kiFk ,oa iQhl) ds vf/fu;e] 1948 (1948 dk 41) dh /kjk 2 ds

[akM (d) ds vuqlj.k esa oSèkkfud vkns'k A

,rn~}kjk] dsaæ ljdkj Hkkjr ds iz/ku dksalykokl] tík esa Jh txeksgu ¯lg] ofj"B lfpoky; lgk;d dks fnukad 17 ebZ] 2016

ls lgk;d dksalqyj vf/dkjh ds rkSj ij dksalqyj lsokvksa ds fuoZgu ds fy, izkfèkd`r djrh gS A

¹la- Vh&4330@01@2016º

izdk'k pUn] mi lfpo (dksalqyj)

MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS

(CPV DIVISION)

New Delhi, the 17th May, 2016

S.O. 1021.—Statutory Order in pursuance of the clause (a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular

Officers (Oaths and Fees) Act, 1948 (41 of 1948), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Jagmohan Singh,

Senior Secretariat Assistant as Assistant Consular Officer in Consulate General of India, Jeddah to perform the

Consular services with effect from 17th May, 2016.

[No. T-4330/01/2016]

PRAKASH CHAND, Dy. Secy. (Consular)

ubZ fnYyh] 19 ebZ] 2016

dk-vk- 1022-—jktuf;d vkSj dksalqyh; vf/dkjh ('kiFk ,oa iQhl) ds vf/fu;e] 1948 (1948 dk 41) dh /kjk 2 ds

[akM (d) ds vuqlj.k esa oSèkkfud vkns'k A

2274

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

,rn~}kjk] dsaæ ljdkj Hkkjrh; okf.kT; nwrkokl] tkfgnu esa Jh lquhy dqekj lwn] lgk;d vuqHkkx vf/dkjh dks fnukad 19 ebZ]

2016 ls lgk;d dksalqyj vf/dkjh ds rkSj ij dksalqyj lsokvksa ds fuoZgu ds fy, izkfèkd`r djrh gS A

¹la- Vh&4330@01@2016º

izdk'k pUn] mi lfpo (dksalqyj)

New Delhi, the 19th May, 2016

S.O. 1022.—Statutory Order in pursuance of the clause (a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular

Officers (Oaths and Fees) Act, 1948 (41 of 1948), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Sunil Kumar Sood,

ASO as Assistant Consular Officer in Consulate of India, Zahidan to perform the Consular services with effect from

19th May, 2016.

[No. T-4330/01/2016]

PRAKASH CHAND, Dy. Secy. (Consular)

िव

िव

िव

िव मंालय

मंालय

मंालय

मंालय

(राज व

राज व

राज व

राज व िवभाग

िवभाग

िवभाग

िवभाग)

नई दली, 25 मई, 2016

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 1023

1023

1023

1023.—िवB त मं(ालय, राज4 व िवभाग Qारा दनांक 24.12.2014 क अिधसूचना (फा. सं.

ए- 35011/6/2013-शा.ईडी) क िनरंतरता म% और िवदेशी मु ा बंधन अिधिनयम, 1999 (1999 का 42) क धारा 37

क उप धारा (2) Qारा दत शिRय का योग करते Sए क% सरकार एतदQारा Tीमती नीता एन. बेहरामUाम, सहायक

महाबंधक, भारतीय 1रजव, बVक, जो वत,मान म% वत,न िनदेशालय, मु2 यालय काया,लय, नई द ली म% उप िनदेशक के 4 तर

पर परामश,दाता के 5प म% तैनात हV, को 16.12.2014 से एक वष, क अविध के िलए या वत,न िनदेशालय म% उनक

तैनाती तक िवदेशी मु ा बंधन अिधिनयम,1999 (1999 का 42) क धारा 13 म% उिलिखत कसी उ लंघन क जांच

करने के िलए ािधकृत करती है।

[फा. सं. ए-35011/06/2013-शा.-ईडी]

वी. Tीकुमार, अवर सिचव

MINISTRY OF FINANCE

(Department of Revenue)

New Delhi, the 25th May, 2016

S.O. 1023.—In continuation of Notification dated 24.12.2014 issued by Ministry of Finance Department of

Revenue (F.No.A-35011/6/2013-Ad.ED) and in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of Section 37 of

Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (42 of 1999), the Central Government hereby authorizes Smt. Neeta N.

Behramfram, Assistant General Manager, Reserve Bank of India, presently posted as Consultant at the level of Deputy

Director in the Directorate of Enforcement, Head Quarters Office, New Delhi to investigate any contravention referred

to in section 13 of Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (42 of 1999) for a period of one year from 16.12.2014 or

till her posting in Enforcement Directorate.

[F. No. A-35011/06/2013-Ad.ED]

V. SREEKUMAR, Under Secy.

dkfeZd] yksd f’kdk;r rFkk isa’ku ea=ky;

dkfeZd] yksd f’kdk;r rFkk isa’ku ea=ky;

dkfeZd] yksd f’kdk;r rFkk isa’ku ea=ky;

dkfeZd] yksd f’kdk;r rFkk isa’ku ea=ky;

¼dkfeZd vkSj izf’k{k.k foHkkx½

¼dkfeZd vkSj izf’k{k.k foHkkx½

¼dkfeZd vkSj izf’k{k.k foHkkx½

¼dkfeZd vkSj izf’k{k.k foHkkx½

ubZ fnYyh] 19 ebZ] 2016

dk-vk- 1024-—dsUnz ljdkj ,rn}kjk naM izfdz;k lafgrk] 1973 ¼1974 dk vf/kfu;e la- 2½ dh /kkjk 24 dh mi/kkjk ¼8½ }kjk iznRr

‘kfä;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, egkjk”Vª jkT; ds iq.ks] vgenuxj] vkSjaxkckn] chM] tyuk] djkM] dksYgkiqj] ekysxkao] ektyxkao] vksLekukckn] lkaxyh]

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938

2275

lrkjk ,oa ‘kksykiqj esa dsUnzh; vUos”k.k C;wjks }kjk mUgsa lkSais x, fnYyh fo’ks”k iqfyl LFkkiuk ¼ds-v- C;wjks½ }kjk laLFkkfir ekeyksa dk fopkj.k

U;k;ky;ksa esa vfHk;kstu dk lapkyu djus rFkk fof/k }kjk laLFkkfir iqujh{k.k vFkok vihyh; U;k;ky;ksa esa mu ekeyksa ls mRiUu izklafxd vU;

ekeyksa esa vihy@iqujh{k.k gsrq fuEufyf[kr vf/koDrkvksa dks mudh fu;qfDr dh rkjh[k ls rhu o”kZ dh vof/k rd vFkok vxys vkns’kksa rd] tks Hkh

igys gks] fo’ks”k yksd vfHk;kstd ds :i esa fu;qDr djrh gS%

loZJh

¼1½

vkuan xksiky dq:Mdj

¼2½

fot;dqekj Hkqtaxjko /kdkus

[Qk- la- 225@05@2016&,-oh-Mh--II]

eks0 unhe] voj lfpo

MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS

(Department of Personnel and Training)

New Delhi, the 19th May, 2016

S.O. 1024.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (8) of section 24 of the Code of Criminal

Procedure, 1973 (Act No. 2 of 1974), the Central Government hereby appoints following Advocates as Special Public

Prosecutor for conducting prosecution of cases instituted by Delhi Special Police Establishment (CBI) in the State of

Maharashtra at Pune, Ahmednagar, Aurangabad, Beed, Jalna, Karad, Kolhapur, Malegaon, Majalgaon, Osmanabad,

Sangli, Satara and Solapur as entrusted to them by the Central Bureau of Investigation in the trial courts and

appeals/revisions or other matters arising out of these cases in revisional or appellate courts established by law for a

period of three years from the date of appointment of further orders, whichever is earlier.

S/Shri

(1)

Anand Gopal Kurdukar

(2)

Vijay Kumar Bhujangrao Dhakane

[F.No. 225/05/2016-AVD-II]

Md. NADEEM, Under Secy.

ubZ fnYyh] 26 ebZ] 2016

dk-vk- 1025-—dsUnz ljdkj ,rn}kjk naM izfdz;k lafgrk] 1973 ¼1974 dk vf/kfu;e la- 2½ dh /kkjk 24 dh mi/kkjk ¼8½ }kjk iznRr

‘kfä;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, dksfgek vkSj fnekiqj fLFkr ukxkySaM jkT; esa dsUnzh; vUos”k.k C;wjks }kjk mUgsa lkSais x, fnYyh fo’ks”k iqfyl LFkkiuk

¼lhchvkbZ½ }kjk laLFkkfir ekeyksa dk Vz~k;y U;k;ky;ksa rFkk dksfgek fLFkr xqokgkVh mPp U;k;ky; dh dksfgek ihB esa vfHk;kstu dk lapkyu

djus rFkk fof/k vkSj dksfgek fLFkr xqokgkVh mPp U;k;ky; dh dksfgek ihB }kjk laLFkkfir iqujh{k.k vFkok vihyh; U;k;ky;ksa esa mu ekeyksa ls

mRiUu izklafxd vU; ekeyksa esa vihy@iqujh{k.k lapkyu djus ds fy, Jh casxMSaxokcSax] vf/koDrk dks fo’ks”k yksd vfHk;kstd ds :i esa fu;qDr

djrh gSA

[Qk- la- 225@02@2016&,-oh-Mh--II]

eks- unhe] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 26th May, 2016

S.O. 1025.— In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section(8) of section 24 of the Code of Criminal

Procedure, 1973 (Act No. 2 of 1974), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Bengdangwabang, Advocate as

Special Public Prosecutor for conducting prosecution of cases instituted by Delhi Special Police Establishment (CBI) in

the state of Nagaland at Kohima and Dimapur as entrusted to him by the Central Bureau of Investigation in the trial

courts and in the Kohima Bench of Gauhati High Court at Kohima and appeals/revisions or other matters arising out of

the cases in revisional or appellate courts established by law and Kohima Bench of Gauhati High Court at Kohima.

[F. No. 225/02/2016-AVD-II]

Md. NADEEM, Under Secy.

2276

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

miHkksDrk ekeys] [kk| vkSj lkoZtfud forj.k ea=ky;

miHkksDrk ekeys] [kk| vkSj lkoZtfud forj.k ea=ky;

miHkksDrk ekeys] [kk| vkSj lkoZtfud forj.k ea=ky;

miHkksDrk ekeys] [kk| vkSj lkoZtfud forj.k ea=ky;

(miHkksDrk ekeys foHkkx

miHkksDrk ekeys foHkkx

miHkksDrk ekeys foHkkx

miHkksDrk ekeys foHkkx)

¼Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks

Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks

Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks

Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks½

ubZ fnYyh] 25 vizSy] 2016

dk-vk- 1026-—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks (izek.ku) fofu;e 1988 ds fu;e 4 ds mifu;e (5) ds vuqlj.k esa Hkkjrh;

ekud C;wjks ,rn~}kjk vf/klwfpr djrk gS fd ftu ykblsalksa ds fooj.k uhps vuqlwph esa fn, x, gS] os Lohd`r dj fn, x,

gSa %

vuq

vuq

vuq

vuqlwph

lwph

lwph

lwph

Øe

la[;k

Ykkblsal

la[;k

Lohd`r djus

dh frfFk

o"kZ@ekg

Ykkblsal/kkjh dk uke

o Ikrk

Hkkjrh; ekud dk

“kh"kZd

Hkk ek

la[;k

Hkkx

vuq

o"kZ

1

7200022484

01/09/2015

एमटैली इंिडया

िलिमटेड

सव नंबर. 214/1

तथा 214/2

पोईयावा, ता सानंद,

अहमदाबाद 382170

फ टलाईजर तथा

कैिमकल इंजै टर

िस टम

14483

1

-

1997

2

7200022585

01/09/2015

बु ट  ला टो

टैकिनकस

एन एच 14, डीसा

हाइवे रोड, ीन वुड

होटल के सामने,

बदरपुरा(कोडाला),

ता पालनपुर,

बनसकांठा 385001

अन लािटसाईजड पी

वी सी पाईपस फार

पोटेबल वाटर स लाईस

-

4985

-

-

2000

3

7200022686

01/09/2015

योगी जवैलस&

शॉप नंबर 3 सुगुन

अपाट&म'ट, 1873/3,

रेलवे  टेशन के सामने,

अमलसाद,

सरीबजरंग, नवसारी-

396310

 वण& तथा  वण& धातु*

के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी

शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन

1417

-

-

1999

4

7200022282

01/09/2015

भा4 यल5 मी  लािटक

इंड6ीज

32, आ7 रा

इंडि6यल एसटेट,

महाल5 मी िमलस के

पीछे, नारोल,

अहमदाबाद

382405

8फ9टगस फार :रिजड

नान मैटेिलक कांडयूटस

3419

-

-

1988

5

7200022989

01/09/2015

मैगनम ए ी इ यूपम'ट

;ा िलिमटेड

सव नंबर

.16पी2/पी1पी1

ग<व मालगाड, ता

डीसा बनसकांठा

ईरीगेशन इ यूपम'ट -

एमीटस&

13487

-

-

1992

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938

2277

385535

6

7200023082

08/09/2015

ई7 वरलाल

हरजीवनदास जवैलस&

;ा िलिमटेड

जी एफ-2, त>िशला

 कवेयर, संक1 प

कृ@ णा बाग के सामने,,

मणीनगर,

अहमदाबाद

 वण& तथा  वण& धातु*

के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी

शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन

1417

-

-

1999

7

7200022787

08/09/2015

 कAपर िलिमटेड

सव नंबर.823,

राजोडा, अहमदाबाद

राजकोट हाइवे के

पास, ता बावला,

अहमदाबाद 382220

यू पी वी सी पाईप फार

सायल तथा वे ट

िडसचाज& िस टम

इनसाईड िबC1डग

इनकलूCडग व':टलेशन

तथा रेन वाटर िस टम

13592

-

-

2013

8

7200022888

08/09/2015

पोलीकैब वायर ;ा

िलिमटेड

66-72, नुरपुरा, ता

हलोल, पंचमहल,

हलोल 369350

ए:रयल बंचड केब1 स

फार वDकग वोलटेज

अपटू एंड इं लूCडग

1100 वी

14255

-

-

1995

9

7200023183

10/09/2015

Eी कृ@ णा इंड 6ीज

 लाट नंबर.87 से 90,

120 से 123

ओम टै सटाई1 स,

पाट&-3, परब, ता

कामरेज

सूरत 394180

अन लािटसाईजड पी

वी सी पाईपस फार

पोटेबल वाटर स लाईस

-

4985

-

-

2000

10

7200023284

11/09/2015

सारने7 वर केबल

इंड 6ीज

महाशिF इंडि6यल

एस् टेट, पाट& 2

अरCवद एस् टेट के

सामने, आर जे

8कनारीवाला के पीछे,

गली नी ;मुख पेलेस,

िचराग डायमंड के

पास, एल बी शा Iी

रोड, बापूनगर,

अहमदाबाद 380024

पी वी सी इंसूले:टड

केबल

694

-

-

1990

11

7200024690

11/09/2015

माड&न पJ प

13, राजकमल एस् टेट,

कुबे7 वर महादेव के

पीछे

जी डी  कूल रोड,

सैजपुर बोघा, नरोडा

रोड अहमदाबाद

382345

सबमKसबल पJ पसैट

8034

-

-

2002

2278

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

12

7200023688

11/09/2015

मा भवानी जवैलस&

सुभाष चौक, मेन

बाजार, तालोड,

साबरकांठा 383215

 वण& तथा  वण& धातु*

के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी

शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन

1417

-

-

1999

13

7200023789

15/09/2015

ईको ीन ;ोड टस

;ा. िलिमटेड

L लाक नंबर.343,

344, 355, एट ग<व:

आलमपुर, ता तथा िड

गांधीनगर 382042

कां8Mट मैसानरी

यूिनटस

2185

3

-

1984

14

7200023385

15/09/2015

अरहम पJ पस

बी-10, बी-11, बी-

12, बी-13,

बी-14, बी-28 तथा

29, जगनाथ

इंडि6यल एसटेट

गुजरात बाटCलग के

पास, रिखयाल

अहमदाबाद 380023

इलैि6क मोनोसैट

पJ पस फार  लीयर,

को1 ड वाटर फार

ए ीक1 चर तथा वाटर

सप् लाईस परपस

9079

-

-

2002

15

7200023486

15/09/2015

सN यम ईरीगेशनस

(इंिडया) ;ा िलिमटेड,

 लाट नंबर.367,

कथवाडा, जी आई डी

सी, रोड नंबर.8,

अहमदाबाद 382430

ईरीगेशन इ यूपम'ट-

 टेनर टाईप 8फलटस&

12785

-

-

1994

16

7200023587

15/09/2015

सN यम ईरीगेशनस

(इंिडया) ;ा िलिमटेड

 लाट नंबर.367,

काठवाडा जी आई डी

सी रोड नंबर.8,

अहमदाबाद 382430

ईरीगेशन इ यूपम'ट -

एमीटस&

13487

-

-

1992

17

7200023890

16/09/2015

 माकोट पJ पस

1, महाशिF एसटेट,

अ रCवद एसटेट के

पास,

अिनल  टाच& िमल के

सामने,

बापूनगर,अहमदाबाद

380025

सबमKसबल पJ पसैट

8034

-

-

2002

18

7200023991

16/09/2015

िजनल ए ो ;ोसैसर

तथा फुड ;ा िलिमटेड

332, मांडवा

कापराडा, नािशक

रोड, एस एच 67, ता

कापराडा, वलसाद

पैकेजबंद

पेयजल (अदर दैन

पैकेQ ड नेचुरल िमनरल

वाटर)

14543

-

-

2004

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938

2279

19

7200024084

18/09/2015

आ था पJ पस

77, आशRवाद

एसटेट,S यू Tुट माक ट

के सामने

नरोडा रोड,

अहमदाबाद 380025

सबमKसबल पJ पसैट

8034

-

-

2002

20

7200024488

18/09/2015

अिभषेक जावेरी

7, इ कान स'टर,

132, 9रग रोड,

सैटेलाईट

रोड अहमदाबाद

380015

 वण& तथा  वण& धातु*

के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी

शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन

1417

-

-

1999

21

7200024589

18/09/2015

 वागत जवैलस&

26, 27, 247,

सोनीवाडा कारनर के

पास, नवा

बाजार,;ांितज,

साबरकांठा 383205

 वण& तथा  वण& धातु*

के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी

शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन

1417

-

-

1999

22

7200024791

22/09/2015

िववेक जवैलस&

सव नंबर 2725, बस

 टाप के पास, पी ओ

पारडी, वलसाद

396125

 वण& तथा  वण& धातु*

के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी

शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन

1417

-

-

1999

23

7200024892

22/09/2015

अलंकार जवैलस&

ए-01-542, कृ@ णा

शेरी, कारोिलया

पोल,

पी ओ मांडवी, 001

 वण& तथा  वण& धातु*

के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी

शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन

1417

-

-

1999

24

7200024185

23/09/2015

इंडोपेिस8फक  लाई

बोड& ;ा िलिमटेड

30, उमा इंडि6यल

एसटेट, भा4 योदया

होटल के पीछे, सानंद

वीरमगाम हाइवे, ता

सानंद अहमदाबाद

L लाक बोड&

1659

-

-

2004

25

7200024286

23/09/2015

इंडोपेिस8फक  लाई

बोड& ;ा िलिमटेड

30, उमा इंडि6यल

एसटेट, भा4 योदया

होटल के पीछे, सानंद

वीरमगाम हाइवे, ता

सानंद अहमदाबाद

 लाईवुड फार जनरल

परपस

303

-

-

1989

26

7200024387

23/09/2015

इंडोपेिस8फक  लाई

बोड& ;ा िलिमटेड

30, उमा इंडि6यल

एसटेट, भा4 योदया

होटल के पीछे, सानंद

वीरमगाम हाइवे, ता

सानंद अहमदाबाद

वुडन फलश डोर शटस&

(सािलड कोर टाईप)

पाट& 1  लाईवुड फेस

पैनलस

2202

1

-

1999

2280

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

27

7200024993

24/09/2015

िसटा लेिमनेटस ;ा

िलिमटेड  लाट नंबर

186, मेहसाणा िवजापुर

रोड, शोभासन के पास,

मेहसाना, कुकास

384001

डैकोरे:टव थमVसै9टग

Cसथै:टक रेिसन बांिडड

लेिमने:टड शीट

2046

-

-

1995

[la- lh ,e Mh 13%11]

डॉ- एस- एल- पालकर] ] ] ] वै6ािनक ‘एफ’ एवं ;मुख

MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

(Department of Consumer Affairs)

(BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS)

New Delhi, the 25th April, 2016

S.O. 1026.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (5) of the regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards

(Certification) Regulations 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars of

which are given in the following schedule:

SCHEDULE

Sl.

No.

Licences

No.

Grant Date

Name & Address of the party

Title of the

Standard

IS

No.

Part

Sec

Year

1

7200022484

01/09/2015

EMTELLE INDIA LIMITED

SURVEY NO. 214/1 & 214/2

PO IYAVA, TAL: SANAND

Ahmedabad 382170

Fertilizer and

chemical injector

system

14483

1

-

1997

2

7200022585

01/09/2015

BOOST PLASTO TECHNICS

N,H, 14, DEESA HIGHWAY

ROAD

OPP.HOTEL GREEN WOOD

BADARPURA(KODALA)TAL:

PALANPUR

Banaskantha, BADARPURA

385001

Unplasticized pvc

pipes for potable

water supplies -

4985

-

-

2000

3

7200022686

01/09/2015

YOGI JEWELLERS

SHOP NO 3 SUGUN

APARTMENT

1873/3, OPP: RAILWAY

STATION

AMALSAD, SARIBUJRANG

AMALSAD, NAVSARI-396310

Gold and gold

alloys,

jewellery/artefacts

-

fineness and

marking -

1417

-

-

1999

4

7200022282

01/09/2015

BHAGYALAXMI PLASTIC

INDUSTRIES

32, ASHRA INDL ESTATE

BEIND MAHALAXMI MILLS,

NAROL

Ahmedabad 382405

Fittings for rigid

non-metallic

conduits

3419

-

-

1988

5

7200022989

01/09/2015

MAGNUM AGRI

EQUIPMENTS PVT LTD

SURVEY NO.16P2/P1/P1

VILLAGE: MALGADH, TA:

DEESA

BANASKANTHA 385535

Irrigation

equipment -

emitters

13487

-

-

1992

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938

2281

6

7200023082

08/09/2015

ISHWARLAL HARJIVANDAS

JEWELLERS PVT LTD

GF-2, TAKSHASHILA

SQUARE,

OPPOSITE SANKALP

KRISHNABAUGH,

MANINAGAR, AHMEDABAD

Gold and gold

alloys,

jewellery/artefacts

-

fineness and

marking -

1417

-

-

1999

7

7200022787

08/09/2015

SKIPPER LIMITED

SURVEY NO.823, RAJODA,

NEAR AHMEDABAD-RAJKOT

HIGHWAY

TALUKA: BAVLA

AHMEDABAD 382220

Upvc pipes for

soil and waste

discharge

systems inside

buiildings

including

ventilation

and rainwater

system

13592

-

-

2013

8

7200022888

08/09/2015

POLYCAB WIRES PRIVATE

LIMITED

66-72, NOORPURA, TAL:

HALOL

PANCHMAHAL HALOL

369350

Aerial bunched

cables for

working voltagess

upto and

including 1100

volts

14255

-

-

1995

9

7200023183

10/09/2015

SHREE KRISHNA

INDUSTRIES

PLOT NO.87 TO 90, 120 TO 123

OM TEXTILES PART-3,

PARAB

TA: KAMREJ, SURAT 394180

Unplasticized pvc

pipes for potable

water supplies

4985

-

-

2000

10

7200023284

11/09/2015

SARNESHWAR CABLE

INDUSTRIES

MAHASHAKTI INDL ESTATE,

PART 2

OPP ARVIND ESTATE, B/H R J

KINARIWALA GALI IN

PRAMUKH

PALACE, NEAR CHIRAG

DIAMOND

L B SHASTRI ROAD,

BAPUAGAR

AHMEDABAD 380024

Pvc insulated

cables

694

-

-

1990

11

7200024690

11/09/2015

MODERN PUMP

13, RAJKAMAL ESTATE

B/H KUBERESHWAR

MAHADEV

G D SCHOOL ROAD, SAIJPUR

BOGHA

NARODA ROAD, Ahmedabad

382345

Submersible

pumpsets -

8034

-

-

2002

12

7200023688

11/09/2015

MAA BHAVANI JEWELLERS

SUBHASH CHOWK,

MAIN BAZAR, TALOD

SABARKANTHA 383215

Gold and gold

alloys, jewellery/

artefacts -

fineness and

marking -

1417

-

-

1999

2282

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

13

7200023789

15/09/2015

ECO GREEN PRODUCTS PVT

LTD

BLOCK NO.343, 344, 355

AT VILLAGE: ALAMPUR

TAL and DISTT:

GANDHINAGAR

AT: ALAMPUR 382042

Concrete masonry

units

2185

3

-

1984

14

7200023385

15/09/2015

ARHAM PUMPS

B-10, B-11,B-12, B-13,

B-14, B-28 & 29, JAGNNATH

INDUSTRIAL ESATATE,

NEAR GUJARAT BOTTLING,

RAKHIAL

AHMEDABAD 380023

Electric monoset

pumps for clear,

cold water

for agricultural

and water supply

purposes -

9079

-

-

2002

15

7200023486

15/09/2015

SATYAM IRRIGATIONS

(INDIA) PVT LTD, PLOT

NO.367,

KATHWADA GIDC, ROAD

NO.8,

KATHWADA, AHMEDABAD

382430

Irrigation

equipment -

strainer-type

filters -

12785

-

-

1994

16

7200023587

15/09/2015

SATYAM IRRIGATIONS

(INDIA) PVT LTD

PLOT NO.367, KATHWADA

GIDC

ROAD NO.8, KATHWADA

AHMEDABAD 382430

Irrigation

equipment -

emitters -

13487

-

-

1992

17

7200023890

16/09/2015

SMACCOT PUMPS

1, MAHASHAKTI

ESTATE

NEAR ARVIND ESTATE

OPP. ANIL STARCH MILL

BAPUNAGAR Ahmedabad

Gujarat 380025

Submersible

pumpsets

8034

-

-

2002

18

7200023991

16/09/2015

JINAL AGRO PROCESSOR &

FOODS

PVT LTD

332, MANDAWA KAPRADA

NASHIK ROAD SH 67,

TALUKA: KAPRADA,

MANDAWA, VALSAD

Packaged

drinking water

(other than

packaged

natural mineral

water) -

14543

-

-

2004

19

7200024084

18/09/2015

ASTHA PUMPS

77, ASHIRWAD ESTATE

OPP.NEW FRUIT MARKET,

NARODA ROAD,

AHMEDABAD 380025

Submersible

pumpsets

8034

-

-

2002

20

7200024488

18/09/2015

ABHISHEK ZAVERI

7, ISCON CENTRE, 132,

RING ROAD, SETELLITE

ROAD,

AHMEDABAD 380015

Gold and gold

alloys,

jewellery/artefacts

-

fineness and

marking -

1417

-

-

1999

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938

2283

21

7200024589

18/09/2015

SWAGAT JEWELLERS

26, 27, 247, NEAR SONIVADA

CORNER NAVA BAZAR,

PRANTIJ, SABARKANTHA

383205

Gold and gold

alloys,

jewellery/artefacts

-

fineness and

marking -

1417

-

-

1999

22

7200024791

22/09/2015

VIVEK JEWELLERS

SURVEY NO 2725, NEAR BUS

STOP

P O PARDI, VALSAD 396125

Gold and gold

alloys,

jewellery/artefacts

-

fineness and

marking -

1417

-

-

1999

23

7200024892

22/09/2015

ALANKAR JEWELLERS

A-01-542, KRISHNA

SHERI, KAROLIA POLE,

P O MANDVI,VADODARA

390001

Gold and gold

alloys,

jewellery/artefacts

-

fineness and

marking -

1417

-

-

1999

24

7200024185

23/09/2015

INDO PACIFIC PLY BOARDS

PVT LTD

30, UMA INDUSTRIAL

ESTATE

BEHIND BHAGYODAYA

HOTEL

SANAND-VIRAMGAM

HIGHWAY

TAL: SANAND,AHMEDABAD

Block boards

1659

-

-

2004

25

7200024286

23/09/2015

INDO PACIFIC PLY BOARDS

PVT LTD

30, UMA INDUSTRIAL

ESTATE

BEHIND BHAGYODAYA

HOTEL

SANAND-VIRAMGAM

HIGHWAY

TAL: SANAND, AHMEDABAD

Plywood for

general purposes

303

-

-

1989

26

7200024387

23/09/2015

INDO PACIFIC PLY BOARDS

PVT LTD

30, UMA INDUSTRIAL

ESTATE

BEHIND BHAGYODAYA

HOTEL

SANAND-VIRAMGAM

HIGHWAY

TAL: SANAND, AHMEDABAD

Wooden flush

door shutters

(solid core type):

part 1 plywood

face panels

2202

1

-

1999

27

7200024993

24/09/2015

SIESTA LAMINATES PVT LD

PLOT NO 186, MEHSANA

VIJAPUR

ROAD, NEAR SHOBHASAN

MEHSANA, KUKAS 384001

Decorative

thermosetting

synthetic resin

bonded laminated

sheets

2046

-

-

1995

[No. CMD/13:11]

Dr. S. L. PALKAR, Scientist ‘F’ & Head

ubZ fnYyh] 25 vizSy] 2016

dk-vk- 1027-—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks (izek.ku) fofu;e 1988 ds fofu;e (5) ds mifofu;e (6) ds vuqlj.k esa

Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks ,rn~}kjk vf/klwfpr djrk gS fd fuEu fooj.k okys ykblsalksa dks muds vkxs n”kkZ;h xbZ rkjh[k ls

jn~n/LFkfxr dj fn;k x;k gS :-

2284

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

vu

vu

vu

vuqlwph

lwph

lwph

lwph

dze

la[;k

Ykkblsal la[;k

lh,e/,y-

Ykkblsal/kkjh dk uke o Ikrk

Ykkblsal ds varxZr oLrq /izde

lEc2

Hkkjrh; ekud dk “kh"kZd

jnn djus dh

frfFk

1

7834488

मैससA ए केफुडस तथा िबवरेिजस

G लाट नंबर 39, जी आई डी सी एसटेट]

मोडासा]

िडिMNकट साबरकांठा 383315

पैकेजबंद पेयजल

(अदर दैन पैकेजड नेचुरल िमनरल वाटर½

आई एस 14543 : 2004

21-09-2015

2

3969794

मैससA आशUवाद रबर टयूब

168] जी आई डी सी पोर रमनगामडी पोर]

िडिMNX ट वडोदरा 391243

आटोमोिटव िवहीकल- टयूबस फार

Z यूमैिटक टायर

आई एस 13098 % 2012

21-09-2015

[la- lh ,e Mh@13%13]

डॉ- एस- एल- पालकर] ] ] ] वै6ािनक ‘एफ’ एवं ;मुख

New Delhi, the 25th April, 2016

S.O. 1027.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (6) of the regulation 5 of the Bureau of Indian Standards(

Certification) Regulations 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies that the licences particulars of which

are given below have been cancelled with effect from the date indicated against each:

SCHEDULE

Sl.

No.

Licences

No.

CM/L-

Name & Address of the Licensee

Article/Process with

relevant Indian Standards

covered by the licence

cancelled

Date of

Cancellation

1

7834488

M/s A. K. FOODS & BEVERAGES

PLOT NO. 39, G.I.D.C. ESTATE, MODASA,

Distt : SABARKANTHA 383315

Packaged drinking water

(other than packaged natural

mineral water) –

IS 14543:2004

21.09.2015

2

3969794

M/s AASHIRVAD RUBBER TUBE

168, GIDC POR RAMANGAMDI POR ,

Distt : Vadodara 391243

Automotive Vehicles-

Tubes for pneumatic tyres

IS 13098:2012

21.09.2015

[No. CMD/13:13]

Dr. S. L. PALKAR, Scientist ‘F’ & Head

ubZ fnYyh] 25 vizSy] 2016

dk-vk- 1028-—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks (izek.ku) fofu;e 1988 ds fu;e 4 ds mifu;e (5) ds vuqlj.k esa Hkkjrh;

ekud C;wjks ,rn~}kjk vf/klwfpr djrk gS fd ftu ykblsalksa ds fooj.k uhps vuqlwph esa fn, x, gS] os Lohd`r dj fn, x, gSa %

vuq

vuq

vuq

vuqlwph

lwph

lwph

lwph

Øe

la[;k

Ykkblsal

la[;k

Lohd`r djus

dh frfFk

o"kZ@ekg

Ykkblsal/kkjh dk uke o

Ikrk

Hkkjrh; ekud dk

“kh"kZd

Hkk ek

la[;k

Hkkx

vuq

o"kZ

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938

2285

1

7200030180

01/12/2015

Eीजी कृपा इंड 6ीज

L लाक नंबर. 46, एट

भोजपुर

गोCवदपुरा टंडालजा, ता

बोडेली,छोटा उदयपुर

ता सानखेडा 391135

;ीका ट कांMAट

पाईप

(िवद तथा िवदाउट

रेिनफोस&म'ट)

458

-

-

2003

2

7200030483

01/12/2015

हाई टैक पाईपस िलिमटेड

ई-6, जी आई डी सी फेस -

II, रोड एफ सानंद,

अहमदाबाद 382170

 टील टयूबस फार

मकैिनकल तथा

जनरल इंिजिनय9रग

परपस

3601

-

-

2006

3

7200030584

02/12/2015

उN सव जवैलस&

हाउस नंबर 60, शॉप नंबर

101, सरदार भीलाडवाला

ब'क के सामने, बाजार रोड,

वलसाद,वापी 396191

 वण& तथा  वण&

धातु* के आभूषण/

िश1 पकारी शु2ता

एवं मुहरांकन

1417

-

-

1999

4

7200029603

02/12/2015

पाथ& डैकोर ;ा िलिमटेड

 लाट नंबर.186, ग<व

कुकास, मेहसाना िवजापुर

रोड, शोभासन चार र ता

के पास,

मेहसाना 384001

L लाक बोड&

1659

-

-

2004

5

7200029906

03/12/2015

अंिबका पाली ला ट

डी-33/B, डायमंड पाक&

नरोडा, जी आई डी सी,

अहमदाबाद 382330

कांडयूटस फार

इलैि6कल

इं टालेशन

9537

3

-

1983

6

7200030988

04/12/2015

जगाजी एकवा

 लाट नंबर.1058, पारले

गोडाउन के पीछे,

 वामीनारायण मं8दर के

पास, सोखाडा

वडोदरा 395745

पैकेजबंद

पेयजल (अदर दैन

पैकेजड नेचुरल

िमनरल वाटर)

14543

-

-

2004

7

7200030685

09/12/2015

िनिहर पालीमस& इंड 6ीज

L लाक नंबर 809, एट पो ट

सांतेज

गांधीनगर,कलोल

382721

केबल 6ंWकग तथा

डक9टग िस टम फार

इलैि6कल

इंसटालेशन

14927

2

-

2001

8

7200030786

09/12/2015

अमूल इंड 6ीज

 लाट नंबर.9, रामदेव

एसटेट, गोता रेलवे Xीज के

कान&र पर, गोता

अहमदाबाद 382481

इलैि6क िसCलग

टाईप फेन तथा

रैगयूलेटस&

374

-

-

1979

9

7200030887

09/12/2015

गोमा ;ोटै ट ;ा. िलिमटेड

नयाका धरमपुर ग<व

सव नंबर. 276,  लाट

इंडै स टू  टील

डैिसगनेशनस

16014

-

-

2012

2286

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

नंबर.1 से 4, गणपित

वुडपलाई इंड 6ीज के पास,

ता खेडा 387550

10

7200030382

10/12/2015

हाई टैक पाईपस िलिमटेड

ई- 6 जीआईडीसी, फेस -

II, रोड एफ, सानंद

अहमदाबाद 382170

हॉलो  टील सै शन

फार  ट&कचरल यूस

4923

-

-

1997

11

7200031081

16/12/2015

वीर  लािटकस ;ा

िलिमटेड

L लाक नंबर.327, सांतेज

बडसर रोड,सांतेज

ता कलोल, गांधीनगर

382721

टै सटाईल – हाई

ड'िसटी पालीथलीन

(पी पी) वोवन सैक

फार पेकेCजग 10

8कला, 15 8कलो,

20 8कलो, 25 8कलो

तथा 308कलो

फुड ेनस

16208

-

-

2015

12

7200031182

16/12/2015

मैसवो पJ पस

14, भावना एस् टेट, मीरा

इंड 6ीज के सामने, मैमको

नरोडा रोड

अहमदाबाद 380025

ओपनवैल

सबमKसबल पJ पसैट

14220

-

-

1994

13

7200031283

16/12/2015

िसटी िमनरल वाटर

 लाट नंबर.5, ाउंड

फलोर

भाजीवाला इंडि6यल

एसटेट, िवभाग-2, ए के

रोड, सूरत 395008

पैकेजबंद

पेयजल (अदर दैन

पैकेजड नेचुरल

िमनरल वाटर)

14543

-

-

2004

14

7200314845

16/12/2015

धनराज जवैलस&

5, Eीमशािलनी माल, आर

सी दत रोड, अलकापुरी,

वडोदरा 390007

 वण& तथा  वण&

धातु* के आभूषण/

िश1 पकारी शु2ता

एवं मुहरांकन

1417

-

-

1999

15

7200031384

18/12/2015

चं_ेश केबल िलिमटेड

L लाक नंबर.1108, ग<व

छतराल

ता कलोल, गांधीनगर

382729

MासCलकड

पालीथलीन

इंसूले:टड पी वी सी

शीथड केबल

7098

2

-

2011

16

7200031586

23/12/2015

वीटरग माक9टग ;ा

िलिमटेड

 लाट नंबर 15, रोड नंबर

4ए,

जी आई डी सी,

काठवाडा,अहमदाबाद

382415

;ेशर स'स:टव

एडहैिसव इंसूले9टग

टेपस फार

इलैि6कल परपस

7809

3

1

1986

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938

2287

17

7200031687

23/12/2015

लैमीफेब इंड 6ीज

 लाट नंबर.

4702/4703/4704/4705,

4604-05 जी आई डी

सी( लािटक जोन)

सारीगाम, ता

उमरग<व,वलसाद

396171

ए ो टै सटाईल-

हाई

ड'िसटी पालीथलीन

(एचडीपीई)

लेिमने:टड वावन ले

फलैट टयूब फार

इरीगेशन परपस

16190

-

-

2014

18

7200031788

23/12/2015

एवर ीन बोडलैम ;ा

िलिमटेड

L लाक नंबर 10, एट

िननाट(सरभान ) ता

बारडोली, सूरत

493350

वुड ;ोड टस –

;ीलेिमने:टड

पा टकल बोड&

12823

-

-

1990

19

7200031889

23/12/2015

एवर ीन बोडलैम ;ा

िलिमटेड

L लाक नंबर 110, एट

िननाट(सरभान ) ता

बारडोली, सूरत

493350

वुड पा टकल बोड&

(मीिडयम ड'िसटी)

फार जनरल परपस

3087

-

-

2005

20

7200031990

23/12/2015

नकोडा ;ोड टस

1102/1103, जी आई डी

सी एस् टेट

वाघोिडया, वडोदरा

391760

आउटडोर टाईप `ी

फेस िडि6बयूशन

6ांसफारमर

1180

1

-

2014

21

7200032184

28/12/2015

गायIी  टील कापVरेशन

395, जी आई डी सी

एस् टेट, मकरपुरा

वडोदरा 390010

ईरीगेशन इ यूपम'ट

– हाइaोसाइकलोन

8फलटस&

14783

-

-

1989

22

7200032285

28/12/2015

नंदन मैटलस तथा टयूबस

;ा िलिमटेड

सव नंबर.108, पानसर

रोड, छतराल, ता

कलोल गांधीनगर

382729

आटोमो:टव

िवहीकल- टयूबस

फार S यूमै:टक टायर

13098

-

-

2012

23

7200032386

29/12/2015

टी जे Q वैलस&

6/2934, Eीिनवास,

XाहJ ण पंचवटी के सामने,

एम जी रोड

नवसारी-396445

 वण& तथा  वण&

धातु* के आभूषण/

िश1 पकारी शु2ता

एवं मुहरांकन

1417

-

-

1999

24

7200032588

30/12/2015

मैगनम ए ी इ यूपम'ट ;ा

िलिमटेड

सव नंबर .16पी2/पी1पी1

ग<व मालगाड, ता डीसा

बनसकांठा 385535

एिम9टग पाईपस

िस टम

13488

-

-

2008

2288

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

25

7200032689

30/12/2015

एडलवाइस मैटलस

िलिमटेड

 लाट नंबर.35,36.37,38

& 40 बी

जी आई डी सी,

फेस III, नरोडा

अहमदाबाद 382330

 वण& तथा  वण&

धातु* के आभूषण/

िश1 पकारी शु2ता

एवं मुहरांकन

1417

-

-

1999

[la- lh ,e Mh@13%11]

डॉ- एस- एल- पालकर] ] ] ] वै6ािनक ‘एफ’ एवं ;मुख

New Delhi, the 25th April, 2016

S.O. 1028.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (5) of the regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards(

Certification) Regulations 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars of

which are given in the following schedule:

SCHEDULE

Sl.

No.

Licences

No.

Grant Date

Name & Address of the party

Title of the

Standard

IS

No.

Part

Sec

Year

1

7200030180

01/12/2015

SHREEJI KRUPA INDUSTRIES

BLOCK NO. 46, AT: BHOJPUR

GOVINDPURA TANDALJA

TAL:

BODELI, Chhota Udaipur

TAL: SANKHEDA 391135

Precast concrete

pipes (with and

without

reinforcement)

458

-

-

2003

2

7200030483

01/12/2015

HI-TECH PIPES LIMITED

E-6, GIDC Phase - II,

Road-F, Sanand,

Ahmedabad 382170

Steel tubes for

mechanical and

general

engineering

purposes

3601

-

-

2006

3

7200030584

02/12/2015

UTSAV JEWELLERS

HOUSE NO 60, SHOP NO. 101

OPP: SARDAR BHILADWALA

BANK

BAZAR ROAD, VALSAD,VAPI

396191

Gold and gold

alloys,

jewellery/artefacts

-

fineness and

marking -

1417

-

-

1999

4

7200029603

02/12/2015

PARTH DECOR PVT LTD

PLOT NO.186, VILLAGE:

KUKAS

MEHSANA-VIJAPUR ROAD

NEAR SHOBHASAN CHAR

RASTA

MEHSANA 384001

Block boards

1659

-

-

2004

5

7200029906

03/12/2015

AMBICA POLYPLAST

D-33/B, DIAMOND PARK

NARODA GIDC NARODA

AHMEDABAD 382330

Conduits for

electrical

installations

9537

3

-

1983

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938

2289

6

7200030988

04/12/2015

JAGAJI AQUA

PLOT NO.1058, BEHIND

PARLE

GODOWN, NEAR

SWAMINARAYAN

MANDIR,SOKHADA

VADODARA 395745

Packaged

drinking water

(other than

packaged

natural mineral

water)

14543

-

-

2004

7

7200030685

09/12/2015

NIHIR POLYMERS

INDUSTRIES

BLOCK NO.809,AT.POST:

SANTEJ

SANTEJ,GANDHINAGAR

KALOL 382721

Cable trunking

and ducting

systems for

electrical

installations

14927

2

-

2001

8

7200030786

09/12/2015

AMUL INDUSTRIES

PLOT NO.9, RAMDEV

ESTATE,

GOTA RAILWAY BRIDGE

CORNER,

GOTA, AHMEDABAD 382481

Electric ceiling

type fans and

regulators

374

-

-

1979

9

7200030887

09/12/2015

GOMA PROTECT PVT LTD

NAYAKA-DHARAMPUR

VILLAGE

SURVEY NO.276, PLOT NO.1

TO 4

NEAR GANPATI WOODPLY

INDUSTRIES TALUKA:

KHEDA 387550

Index to steel

designations

16014

-

-

2012

10

7200030382

10/12/2015

HI-TECH PIPES LIMITED

E-6, GIDC PHASE - II, ROAD-F,

SANAND,

AHMEDABAD 382170

Hollow steel

sections for

structural use

4923

-

-

1997

11

7200031081

16/12/2015

VEER PLASTICS PVT LTD

BLOCK NO.327, SANTEJ

VADSAR

ROAD, SANTEJ, TAL: KALOL

GANDHINAGAR 382721

Textiles - high

density

polyethylene

(hdpe)/

polypropylene

(pp) woven sacks

for packaging

10 kg, 15 kg, 20

kg, 25 kg and 30

kg foodgrains

16208

-

-

2015

12

7200031182

16/12/2015

MESVO PUMPS

14, BHAVNA ESTATE, OPP.

MIRA

INDUSTRIES, MEMCO

NARODA ROAD

AHMEDABAD 380025

Openwell

submersible

pumpsets -

14220

-

-

1994

13

7200031283

16/12/2015

CITY MINERAL WATER

PLOT NO.5, GROUND FLOOR

BHAJIWALA INDUSTRIAL

ESTATE

VIBHAG-2, A K ROAD.SURAT

395008

Packaged

drinking water

(other than

packaged

natural mineral

water)

14543

-

-

2004

2290

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

14

7200314845

16/12/2015

DHANRAJ JEWELLERS

5, SHRIMSHALINI MALL,

R C DUTT ROAD, ALKAPURI

VADODARA 390007

Gold and gold

alloys,

jewellery/artefacts

-

fineness and

marking -

1417

-

-

1999

15

7200031384

18/12/2015

CHANDRESH CABLES

LIMTIED

BLOCK NO.1108, VILLAGE:

CHHATRAL

TALUKA:

KALOL,GANDHINAGAR

CHHATRAL 382729

Crosslinked

polyethylene

insulated pvc

sheathed cable

7098

2

-

2011

16

7200031586

23/12/2015

VEETRAG MARKETING PVT

LTD

PLOT NO 15, ROAD NO 4A,

GIDC,

KATHWADA,AHMEDABAD

382415

Pressure sensitive

adhesive

insulating tapes

for electrical

purposes

7809

3

1

1986

17

7200031687

23/12/2015

LAMIFAB INDUSTRIES

PLOT NO. 4702/4703/4704/4705,

4604-05 GIDC (PLASTIC

ZONE)

SARIGAM, TAL. UMERGAON

VALSAD 396171

Agro textile- high

density

polyethylele

(hdpe)

laminated woven

lay flat tube for

irrigation

purpose

16190

-

-

2014

18

7200031788

23/12/2015

EVERGREEN BOARDLAM

PVT LTD

BLOCK NO.110, AT:NINAT

(SARBHON) TAL: BARDOLI

SURAT, BARDOLI 493350

Wood products -

prelaminated

particle boards

12823

-

-

1990

19

7200031889

23/12/2015

EVERGREEN BOARDLAM

PVT LTD

BLOCK

NO.110,]AT:NINAT(SAR

BHON) TAL: BARDOLI

SURAT 493350

Wood particle

boards (medium

density) for

general purposes

3087

-

-

2005

20

7200031990

23/12/2015

NAKODA PRODUCTS

1102/1103, GIDC ESTATE

WAGHODIA VADODARA

391760

Outdoor type

three-phase

distribution

transformers

1180

1

-

2014

21

7200032184

28/12/2015

GAYATRI STEEL

CORPORATION

395, GIDC ESTATE,

MAKARPURA

VADODARA 390010

Irrigation

equipment -

hydrocyclone

filters

14783

-

-

1989

22

7200032285

28/12/2015

NANDAN METALS & TUBES

PVT LTD

SURVEY NO.108, PANSAR

ROAD

CHHATRALTAL KALOL

GANDHINAGAR 382729

Automotive

vehicles - tubes

for pneumatic

tyres -

13098

-

-

2012

23

7200032386

29/12/2015

T Z JEWELLERS

6/2934, SHREENIVAS, OPP:

BRAHMIN

PANCHWADI, M G ROAD

NAVSARI-396445

Gold and gold

alloys,

jewellery/artefacts

-

fineness and

marking -

1417

-

-

1999

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938

2291

24

7200032588

30/12/2015

MAGNUM AGRI EQUIPMENT

PVT LTD

SURVEY NO.16/P2/P1/P1

VILLAGE: MALGADH

TAL: DEESA, BANASKANTHA

385535

Emitting pipes

system

13488

-

-

2008

25

7200032689

30/12/2015

EDELWEISS METALS

LIMITED

PLOT NO.35,36.37,38 & 40 B

GIDC PHASE III,GIDC

NARODA

AHMEDABAD 382330

Gold and gold

alloys,

jewellery/artefacts

-

fineness and

marking -

1417

-

-

1999

[No. CMD/13:11]

Dr. S. L. PALKAR, Scientist ‘F’ & Head

ubZ fnYyh] 25 vizSy] 2016

dk-vk- 1029-—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks (izek.ku) fofu;e 1988 ds fofu;e (5) ds mifofu;e (6) ds vuqlj.k esa

Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks ,rn~}kjk vf/klwfpr djrk gS fd fuEu fooj.k okys ykblsalksa dks muds vkxs n”kkZ;h xbZ rkjh[k ls

jn~n/LFkfxr dj fn;k x;k gS :-

vu

vu

vu

vuqlwph

lwph

lwph

lwph

dze

la[;k

Ykkblsal la[;k

lh,e/,y-

Ykkblsal/kkjh dk uke o Ikrk

Ykkblsal ds varxZr oLrq /izde

lEc}

Hkkjrh; ekud dk ’kh"kZd

jnn djus dh

frfFk

1

0055328

मैसस& टोर'ट केबल िलिमटेड

कमला मिशन रोड, पी बी नंबर.43,

निडयाड, िड खेडा 387001

पी वी सी इंसूले:टड केबल

आई एस 694:1990

02/12/2015

[la- lh ,e Mh 13%13]

डॉ- एस- एल- पालकर] ] ] ] वै6ािनक ‘एफ’ एवं ;मुख

New Delhi, the 25th April, 2016

S.O. 1029.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (6) of the regulation 5 of the Bureau of Indian Standards(

Certification) Regulations 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies that the licences particulars of which

are given below have been cancelled with effect from the date indicated against each:

SCHEDULE

Sl.

No.

Licences

No.

CM/L-

Name & Address of the Licensee

Article/Process with

relevant Indian Standards

covered by the licence

cancelled

Date of

Cancellation

1

0055328

M/s TORRANT CABLES LTD

KAMLA, MISSION ROAD, P B NO.43,,

NADIAD

Distt : Kheda 387001

PVC INSULATED

CABLES

IS 694:1990

02/12/2015

[No. CMD/13:13]

Dr. S. L. PALKAR, Scientist ‘F’ & Head

2292

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ubZ fnYyh] 25 vizSy] 2016

dk-vk- 1030-—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks (izek.ku) fofu;e 1988 ds fu;e 4 ds mifu;e (5) ds vuqlj.k esa Hkkjrh;

ekud C;wjks ,rn~}kjk vf/klwfpr djrk gS fd ftu ykblsalksa ds fooj.k uhps vuqlwph esa fn, x, gS] os Lohd`r dj fn, x, gSa %

vuq

vuq

vuq

vuqlwph

lwph

lwph

lwph

Øe

la[;k

Ykkblsal

la[;k

Lohd`r djus

dh frfFk

o"kZ@ekg

Ykkblsal/kkjh dk uke

o Ikrk

Hkkjrh; ekud dk

’kh"kZd

Hkk ek

la[;k

Hkkx

vuq

o"kZ

1

7200025086

01/10/2015

मंगलमणी जवैलस&

यूिनयन ब'क के पास,

बाजार रोड, एल आर

काJ पलैकस, वापी,

वलसाद 396191

 वण& तथा  वण& धातु*

के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी

शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन

1417

-

-

1999

2

7200025187

06/10/2015

एस6ाल पालीटै8bक

िलिमटेड

L लाक नंबर:149/1,

150,

151, 172, 176,

ग<व रामपुर, डोलका

खेडा रोड

जी आई डी एसटेट के

सामने, ता डोलका

अहमदाबाद 382225

8फ9टगस फार :रिजड

नान मैटेिलक कांडयूटस

3419

-

-

1988

3

7200025288

08/10/2015

;थम एंटर;ाईस

एसआर नंबर 129/ए,

िचरीपाल िमलस नो

खांचो

;भात टै सटाईस के

पास, नारोल,

अहमदाबाद

382405

पैकेजबंद

पेयजल (अदर दैन

पैकेजड नेचुरल िमनरल

वाटर)

14543

-

-

2004

4

7200025389

09/10/2015

सपना इंड 6ीज

77, अमर एसटेट,

सुपर Xेड के सामने ,

अिनल  टाच& रोड,

नरोडा अहमदाबाद

380025

सबमKसबल पJ पसैट

8034

-

-

2002

5

7200025591

12/10/2015

जय अंबे जवैलस&

2613/3, टcनग

पवांइट, अंधे7 वर रोड,

अमलसाड

नवसारी 396310

 वण& तथा  वण& धातु*

के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी

शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन

1417

-

-

1999

6

7200025490

13/10/2015

जे के वधवा तथा

कJ पनी

 लाट नंबर

हाइaोकला:रक एिसड

265

-

-

1993

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938

2293

2920/Aफेस -1

जी आई डी सी वापी

वलसाद 396195

7

7200025692

15/10/2015

सूरज िबवरेिजस

सव नंबर. 376,

8दि4 वजय ए ो

इंड 6ीज

जैन देरासर के पास,

सानंद बावला रोड,

ग<व मोडासर, ता

सानंद, िडि6 ट

अहमदाबाद 382220

पैकेजबंद

पेयजल (अदर दैन

पैकेजड नेचुरल िमनरल

वाटर)

14543

-

-

2004

8

7200025793

15/10/2015

के एस पी पJ पस

66, अमर एसटेट,

लूबी इलैि6कलस के

पास

मैमको Mास

रोड,नरोडा रोड

अहमदाबाद 380025

सबमKसबल पJ पसैट

8034

-

-

2002

9

7200026189

15/10/2015

िमता जवैलस&

1366, मेन बाजार,

गोजा:रया,

मेहसाना 382825

 वण& तथा  वण& धातु*

के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी

शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन

1417

-

-

1999

10

7200026391

15/10/2015

स'चरी ए वा

टी पी नंबर 8,

सव नंबर .71,

वाड& नंबर. 22-सी,

बैकसाइड नयू बांबे

माक ट,

उमरवाडा, सूरत

पैकेजबंद

पेयजल (अदर दैन

पैकेजड नेचुरल िमनरल

वाटर)

14543

-

-

2004

11

7200026290

16/10/2015

सdाट सी Xाईनस ;ा

िलिमटेड

सव नंबर .283, ग<व

संतलपुर, पालनपुर

कंडाला हाइवे,

संतलपुर, पाटन

385350

आयोडाईसड सॉ1 ट

7224

-

-

2006

12

7200025894

16/10/2015

जावेरी तथा कंपनी

(गुजरात) एल एल पी

13-बी, नोध नंबर.

285/288,  लाट

नंबर.9,

च<दी तथा च<दी धातु*

के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी

शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन

2112

-

-

2003

2294

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

S यू नंबर. 2349,

जावेरी हाउस, आई

डी बी आई ब'क के

पास, गोड डोड रोड,

अथवालाईनस,

सूरत 395007

13

7200025995

16/10/2015

जावेरी तथा कंपनी

(गुजरात) एल एल पी

जी/12,  वागत

काJ पलैकस,  वागत

चार र ता, सी जी

रोड,

एलीसीज,अहमदाबाद

380006

च<दी तथा च<दी धातु*

के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी

शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन

2112

-

-

2003

14

7200026088

16/10/2015

जावेरी तथा कंपनी

(गुजरात) एल एल पी

10, इसकान स'टर,

सैटेलाईट रोड,

जोधपुर,

अहमदाबाद

380015

च<दी तथा च<दी धातु*

के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी

शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन

2112

-

-

2003

15

7200026492

20/10/2015

ह:रओम जवैलस&

शॉप नंबर .2,

राजल5 मी काJ पलै स,

एच डी एफसी ब'क के

नीचे, कोपारली रोड,

गुजन, जी आई डी

सी,वापी, वलसाद

396195

 वण& तथा  वण& धातु*

के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी

शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन

1417

-

-

1999

16

7200026593

23/10/2015

जी जी सी गुजरात

गो1 ड स'टर ;ा

िलिमटेड

गुजासत हाजरी िमल

कJ पाउंड, िवजय

पे6ाल पJ प के पीछे,

रिखयाल रोड,

अहमदाबाद 380021

 वण& तथा  वण& धातु*

के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी

शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन

1417

-

-

1999

17

7200026694

26/10/2015

अिभनव पालीमस&

ए-2/3909, जी आई

डी एसटेट, फेस VI,

वटवा, अहमदाबाद

382445

रोटेशनल मोलिडड

पालीथिलन वाटर

 टोरेज ट'क

12701

-

-

1996

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938

2295

18

7200026795

26/10/2015

सनातन इंड 6ीज

2-3, ांड िवशाला

एसटेट, कणा&वती

एसटेट के पास

एस पी 9रग रोड,

ओढव, अहमदाबाद

382415

पJ पस – :रजैनरे:टव

या  लीयर, को1 ड वाटर

8472

-

-

1998

19

7200026997

27/10/2015

सेफव1 ड िस टमस ;ा

िलिमटेड

1463, 1464, ग<व

मोती बोयन,

खतराज-कलोल रोड,

पुरानी अरCवद िमल

के पास,

खतराज, गांधीनगर,

कलोल 382721

कं6ोलड परकोले9टग

फार फायर फाय9टग

8423

-

-

1994

20

7200027292

28/10/2015

जेबी  लािटक

बी-119, Eीराम

इंडि6यल एसटेट

िबले7 वर इंडि6यल

एसटेट के पीछे, 9रग

रोड, ओढव,

अहमदाबाद 382415

इरीगेशन इ यूपम'ट

- रोटे9टग  ;ीनकलर

12232

1

-

1996

21

7200027797

28/10/2015

अंिबका जवैलस&

गांधी रोड, मेन

बाजार,

पाटन 384265

 वण& तथा  वण& धातु*

के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी

शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन

1417

-

-

1999

22

7200027090

29/10/2015

महेश इंड 6ीज

 लाट नंबर.500, रोड

नंबर.13, फेस -II,

ओढव 9रग रोड के

पास, काठवाडा,

जीआई डी सी,

अहमदाबाद 382430

अन लािटसाईजड पी

वी सी पाईपस फार

पोटेबल वाटर स लाईस

4985

-

-

2000

23

7200026896

29/10/2015

माही पािलमस&

एस आर नबर 189,

बलाक नंबर.147,

 लाट नंबर.06. पैकA

ओलिJपया गली, 8कम

चार र ता,

ता मंगरोल

एट मोटा, बोरासरा,

सूरत394110

अन लािटसाईजड पी

वी सी पाईपस फार

पोटेबल वाटर स लाईस

4985

-

-

2000

2296

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

24

7200028193

29/10/2015

सागर वाटर

41 से 50 पाई  लाट

नंबर 9/10 ( ाउंड

फलोर तथा

मेजानाइन फलोर),

भातेना इंडि6यल -2

िचमनी टेकरो के पास,

अंजाना, सूरत

395010

पैकेजबंद

पेयजल (अदर दैन

पैकेजड नेचुरल िमनरल

वाटर)

14543

-

-

2004

25

7200027494

30/10/2015

Eीजी जवैलस&

4, Eीनाथजी

काJ पलै स,िशवम

हािपटल के नीचे

च<दलोिडया,

अहमदाबाद

380081

च<दी तथा च<दी धातु*

के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी

शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन

2112

-

-

2003

26

7200027595

30/10/2015

चोकसी

हाजीउमरभाई

ओडभाई मैमन

मेन बाजार, खेरालू,

मेहसाना

 वण& तथा  वण& धातु*

के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी

शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन

1417

-

-

1999

27

7200027696

30/10/2015

शैलजास डायमंड

जवैलरी

83-ए, फलैट नंबर.

201, नालंदा

रैिसड'सी, जाली

रैिसड'सी के सामने,

वेसु, सूरत 395007

 वण& तथा  वण& धातु*

के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी

शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन

1417

-

-

1999

[la- lh ,e Mh@13%11]

डॉ- एस- एल- पालकर] ] ] ] वै6ािनक ‘एफ’ एवं ;मुख

New Delhi, the 25th April, 2016

S.O. 1030.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (5) of the regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards (

Certification) Regulations 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars of

which are given in the following Schedule:

SCHEDULE

Sl.

No.

Licences

No.

Grant Date

Name & Address of the party

Title of the

Standard

IS

No.

Part

Sec

Year

1

7200025086

01/10/2015

MANGALMANI JEWELLERS

NEAR UNION BANK,BAZAR

ROAD, L R COMPLEX,VAPI,

VALSAD 396191

Gold and gold

alloys,

jewellery/artefacts

-

fineness and

marking -

1417

-

-

1999

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938

2297

2

7200025187

06/10/2015

ASTRAL POLYTECHNIK

LIMITED

BLOCK NO:149/1, 150,

151, 172, 176, VILLAGE

RAMPUR,

DHOLKA-KHEDA ROAD, OPP.

GIDC ESTATE, TAL:DHOLKA,

AHMEDABAD 382225

Fittings for rigid

non-metallic

conduits

3419

-

-

1988

3

7200025288

08/10/2015

PRATHAM ENTERPRISE

SR NO.129/A, CHIRIPAL

MILLS NO

KHANCHO NEAR PRABHAT

TEXTILES

NAROL,AHMEDABAD 382405

Packaged

drinking water

(other than

packaged

natural mineral

water) -

14543

-

-

2004

4

7200025389

09/10/2015

SAPNA INDUSTRIES

77, AMAR ESTATE

OPP.SUPER BREAD, ANIL

STARCH ROAD

NARODA,AHMEDABAD

380025

Submersible

pumpsets

8034

-

-

2002

5

7200025591

12/10/2015

JAY AMBE JEWELLERS

2613/3, TURNING POINT,

ANDHESHWAR ROAD,

AMALSAD

SARIBUJRANG, AMALSAD

NAVSARI 396310

Gold and gold

alloys,

jewellery/artefacts

-

fineness and

marking -

1417

-

-

1999

6

7200025490

13/10/2015

J.K.WADHWA AND

COMPANY

PLOT NO 2920/A,PHASE-1

GIDC VAPI, VALSAD 396195

Hydrochloric acid

265

-

-

1993

7

7200025692

15/10/2015

SURAJ BEVERAGES

SURVEY NO. 376, DIGVIJAY

AGRO

INDUSTRIES, NR JAIN

DERASAR, SANAND BAVLA

ROAD, VILLAGE MODASAR,

TAL SANAND

DISTT AHMEDABAD 382220

Packaged

drinking water

(other than

packaged

natural mineral

water) -

14543

-

-

2004

8

7200025793

15/10/2015

KSP PUMPS

66, AMAR ESTATE

NEAR LUBI ELECTRICALS

MEMCO CROSS ROAD,

NARODA ROAD

AHMEDABAD 380025

Submersible

pumpsets -

8034

-

-

2002

9

7200026189

15/10/2015

SMITA JEWELLERS

1366, MAIN BAZAR,

GOZARIYA,

MEHSANA 382825

Gold and gold

alloys,

jewellery/artefacts

-

fineness and

marking -

1417

-

-

1999

10

7200026391

15/10/2015

CENTURY AQUA

TP NO.8, SURVEY

NO.71, WARD NO. 22-C,

BACKSIDE NEW BOMBAY

MARKET,

UMARWADA, SURAT

Packaged

drinking water

(other than

packaged

natural mineral

water) -

14543

-

-

2004

2298

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

11

7200026290

16/10/2015

SAMRAT SEA BRINES PVT

LTD

SURVEY NO.283, VILLAGE:

SANTALPUR, PALANPUR-

KANDALA

HIGHWAY,SANTALPUR,

PATAN 385350

Iodized salt

7224

-

-

2006

12

7200025894

16/10/2015

ZAVERI AND COMPANY

(GUJARAT)

LLP

13-B, NONDH NO. 285/288,

PLOT NO.9,

NEW NO. 2349, ZAVERI

HOUSE, NR IDBI

BANK,GHODDOD ROAD,

ATHWALINES, SURAT 395007

Silver and silver

alloys,

jewellery/artefacts

-

fineness and

marking -

2112

-

-

2003

13

7200025995

16/10/2015

ZAVERI AND COMPANY

(GUJARAT)

LLP

G/12, SWAGAT COMPLEX,

SWAGAT

CHAR RASTA, C G ROAD,

ELLISBRIDGE,AHMEDABAD

380006

Silver and silver

alloys,

jewellery/artefacts

-

fineness and

marking -

2112

-

-

2003

14

7200026088

16/10/2015

ZAVERI AND COMPANY

(GUJARAT)

LLP

10, ISHCON CENTRE,

SATELLITE ROAD, JODHPUR,

AHMEDABAD 380015

Silver and silver

alloys,

jewellery/artefacts

-

fineness and

marking -

2112

-

-

2003

15

7200026492

20/10/2015

HARI OM JEWELLERS

SHOP NO.2, RAJLAXMI

COMPLEX,

BELOW HDFC BANK,

KOPARLI ROAD,

GUNJAN, GIDC, VAPI

VALSAD 396195

Gold and gold

alloys,

jewellery/artefacts

-

fineness and

marking -

1417

-

-

1999

16

7200026593

23/10/2015

GGC GUJARAT GOLD

CENTRE PVT LTD

GUJARAT HOSIERY MILLL

COMPOUND

BEHIND VIJAY PETROL

PUMP

RAKHIAL ROAD,

AHMEDABAD380021

Gold and gold

alloys,

jewellery/artefacts

-

fineness and

marking -

1417

-

-

1999

17

7200026694

26/10/2015

ABHINAV POLYMERS

A-2/3909, GIDC ESTATE

PHASE VI, VATVA

AHMEDABAD 382445

Rotational

moulded

olyethylene water

storage tanks

12701

-

-

1996

18

7200026795

26/10/2015

SANATAN INDUSTRIES

2-3, GRAND VISHALA

ESTATE

NEAR KARNAVATI ESTATE

S P RING ROAD, ODHAV

AHMEDABAD 382415

Pumps -

regenerative or

clear, cold water

8472

-

-

1998

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938

2299

19

7200026997

27/10/2015

SAFEWORLD SYSTEMS PVT

LTD

1463, 1464, VILLAGE: MOTI

BHOYAN

KHATRAJ-KALOL, ROAD

NEAR OLD ARVIND MILL,

KHATRAJ, GANDHINAGAR,

KALOL 382721

Controlled

percolating hose

for fire fighting

8423

-

-

1994

20

7200027292

28/10/2015

J B PLASTIC

B-119, SHRIRAM INDL

ESTATE

BEHIND BILESHWAR

IND.ESTATE

RING ROAD, ODHAV

AHMEDABAD 382415

Irrigation

equipment -

rotating sprinkler

12232

1

-

1996

21

7200027797

28/10/2015

AMBICA JEWELLERS

GANDHI ROAD,

MAIN BAZAR, PATAN 384265

Gold and gold

alloys,

jewellery/artefacts

-

fineness and

marking -

1417

-

-

1999

22

7200027090

29/10/2015

MAHESH INDUSTRIES

PLOT NO.500, ROAD NO.13

PHASE-II, NEAR ODHAV

RING ROAD

KATHWADA GIDC

AHMEDABAD 382430

Unplasticized pvc

pipes for potable

water

supplies

4985

-

-

2000

23

7200026896

29/10/2015

MAHI POLYMERS

SR. NO 189, BLOCK NO.147,

PLOT NO.06.PAIKI

OLAMPIYA GALI,KIM

CHAR RASTA TAL:

MANGROL

AT: MOTA BORASARA,

SURAT 394110

Unplasticized pvc

pipes for potable

water

supplies

4985

-

-

2000

24

7200028193

29/10/2015

SAGAR WATER

41 TO 50 PAI PLOT NO 9/10

(GROUND FLOOR &

MEZZANINE FLOOR)

BHATENA INDUSTRIAL-2

NEAR CHIMANI TEKRO.

ANJANA

SURAT 395010

Packaged

drinking water

(other than

packaged

natural mineral

water) -

14543

-

-

2004

25

7200027494

30/10/2015

SHRIJI JEWELLERS

4, SHRINATHJI COMPLEX

UNDER SHIVAM HOSPITAL

CHANDLODIA, AHMEDABAD

380081

Silver and silver

alloys,

jewellery/artefacts

-

fineness and

marking -

2112

-

-

2003

26

7200027595

30/10/2015

CHOKSI HAJIUMARBHAI

AUDBHAI MEMON

MAIN BAZAR, KHERALU,

MEHSANA

Gold and gold

alloys,

jewellery/artefacts

-

fineness and

marking -

1417

-

-

1999

2300

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

27

7200027696

30/10/2015

SHAILJA'S DIAMOND

JEWELLERY

83-A, FLAT NO. 201,

NALANDA

RESIDENCY, OPP JOLLY

RESIDENCEY, VESU,

SURAT 395007

Gold and gold

alloys,

jewellery/artefacts

-

fineness and

marking -

1417

-

-

1999

[No. CMD/13:11]

Dr. S. L. PALKAR, Scientist ‘F’ & Head

ubZ fnYyh] 25 vizSy] 2016

dk-vk- 1031-—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks (izek.ku) fofu;e 1988 ds fofu;e (5) ds mi&fofu;e (6) ds vuqlj.k esa

Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks ,rn~}kjk vf/klwfpr djrk gS fd fuEu fooj.k okys ykblsalksa dks muds vkxs n”kkZ;h xbZ rkjh[k ls

jn~n/LFkfxr dj fn;k x;k gS :-

vu

vu

vu

vuqlwph

lwph

lwph

lwph

dze

la[;k

Ykkblsal la[;k

lh,e/,y-

Ykkblsal/kkjh dk uke o Ikrk

Ykkblsal ds varxZr oLrq /izde

lEc}

Hkkjrh; ekud dk “kh"kZd

jnn djus dh

frfFk

कोई नहg

[la- lh ,e Mh@13%13]

डॉ- एस- एल- पालकर] ] ] ] वै6ािनक ‘एफ’ एवं ;मुख

New Delhi, the 25th April, 2016

S.O. 1031.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (6) of the regulation 5 of the Bureau of Indian Standards

(Certification) Regulations 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies that the licences particulars of which

are given below have been cancelled with effect from the date indicated against each:

SCHEDULE

Sl.

No.

Licences

No.

CM/L-

Name & Address of the Licensee

Article/Process with

relevant Indian Standards

covered by the licence

cancelled

Date of

Cancellation

NIL

[No. CMD/13:13]

Dr. S. L. PALKAR, Scientist ‘F’ & Head

ubZ fnYyh] 25 vizSy] 2016

dk-vk- 1032-—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks (izek.ku) fofu;e 1988 ds fu;e 4 ds mifu;e (5) ds vuqlj.k esa Hkkjrh;

ekud C;wjks ,rn~}kjk vf/klwfpr djrk gS fd ftu ykblsalksa ds fooj.k uhps vuqlwph esa fn, x, gS] os Lohd`r dj fn,

x, gSa %

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938

2301

vuq

vuq

vuq

vuqlwph

lwph

lwph

lwph

Øe

la[;k

Ykkblsal

la[;k

Lohd`r djus

dh frfFk

o"kZ@ekg

Ykkblsal/kkjh dk uke

o Ikrk

Hkkjrh; ekud dk

“kh"kZd

Hkk ek

la[;k

Hkkx

vuq

o"kZ

1

7200027393

02/11/2015

िवसात है1 थ केयर

एस आर .13 से 16,

21, 22, 35, 114, 57

पाई-ए/1,  लाट

नंबर.ए/1 , माhित

इंडि6यल एसटेट,

बी आर सी कालोनी के

सामने, भेढवाड, सूरत

394221.

पैकेजबंद

पेयजल (अदर दैन

पैकेजड नेचुरल िमनरल

वाटर)

14543

-

-

2004

2

7200027999

02/11/2015

गो1 ड लाईन

आरनाम'टस ;ा

िलिमटेड

पहली मंिजल, रोनक

माक ट,

एस टी वकस&शॉप

रोड, मेहसाना

 वण& तथा  वण& धातु*

के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी

शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन

1417

-

-

1999

3

7200028092

03/11/2015

जे जे जवैलस&

सुभास चौक टावर के

पास

तालोड, साबरकांठा

383215

 वण& तथा  वण& धातु*

के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी

शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन

1417

-

-

1999

4

7200027898

03/11/2015

ह:रओम इंड 6ीज

 लाट नंबर .448,

रोड नंबर 11

काठवाडा,

अहमदाबाद 382415

मोटस& फार सबमKसबल

पJ पसैट

9283

-

-

2013

5

7200030079

06/11/2015

िनशू पेवस&

L लाक नंबर.1824,

िचखली वसडा रोड

हंस कवेरी के पास,

राज कैिमकलस के

सामने ग<व अलीपोर,

ता िचखली , नवसारी

396521

;ीका ट कांMAट L लाकस

फार पेCवग

15658

-

-

2006

6

7200028294

09/11/2015

ह:रओम वुड ;ोड टस

18/ए, जाक

इंडि6यल ए:रया,

ग<व जाक, पी ओ

पारधोल, ता

देहगाम,गांधीनगर

382325

मे:रन  लाईवुड

710

-

-

2010

2302

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

7

7200028597

09/11/2015

िमलन जवैलस&

 लाट सी-4,शॉप

नंबर.3, ांड कैसटल

िबC1डग

कोपारली रोड,

जीआई डी सी, वापी,

वलसाद 396195

 वण& तथा  वण& धातु*

के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी

शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन

1417

-

-

1999

8

7200028496

10/11/2015

सुवण&कला ;ा

िलिमटेड.

101, ने7 नल  लाजा,

सुपरमाल के

सामने, सी जी रोड,

अहमदाबाद 380006

च<दी तथा च<दी धातु*

के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी

शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन

2112

-

-

2003

9

7200028395

16/11/2015

िशवम फुडस तथा

िबवरेिजस

9,10 सोमे7 वर

काJ पलै स, कुंडाल

ग<व

मेहसाना, कडी

382715

पैकेजबंद

पेयजल (अदर दैन

पैकेजड नेचुरल िमनरल

वाटर)

14543

-

-

2004

10

7200027191

19/11/2015

बु ट  ला टो टैकनीक

सव नंबर.89/1,एन

एच, 14, डीसा हाइवे

रोड

ीन वुड होटल के

सामने, बदरपुरा,

कोडाला

ता पालनपुर

385001

अन लािटसाईड पी वी

सी  MAन तथा केCसग

पाईपस फार बोर/

टयूबवैल

12818

-

-

2010

11

7200028698

20/11/2015

गीता इंिजिनय9रग

कJ पनी

डी/66, डायमंड पाक&,

नरोडा, जी आई डी

सी एसटेट, नरोडा,

अहमदाबाद 380025

मोटस& फार सबमKसबल

पJ पसैट

9283

-

-

2013

12

7200028799

20/11/2015

परिनल इंड 6ीज

 लाट

नंबर.82/9/ए,फेस 1

जी आईडी सी,वटवा,

अहमदाबाद 382445

Cसगल फेस  माल ए सी

एंड यूिनवस&ल इलैि6क

मोटस&

996

-

-

2009

13

7200028803

20/11/2015

िवiा पJ प इंड 6ीज

शैड नंबर.13,

िसमफनी एसटेट,

इंगरसोल के पीछे, पी

एच 1,जी आईडी सी,

नरोडा अहमदाबाद

सबमKसबल पJ पसैट

8034

-

-

2002

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938

2303

14

7200029397

23/11/2015

बड़ोदा ए ो

कैिमकलस िलिमटेड

सव नंबर.40,

यशकमल इंिड 6यल

एसटेट, बा का

ताजपुरा रोड, वी पी

पेनलाव, ता हलोल

पंचमहल 389350

मैनकोजैब वाटर

िडसपरिसबल पाउडर

कंसं6ेट

8708

-

-

2006

15

7200029296

24/11/2015

Eीजी िबवरेिजस

सी/41/191 कृ@ णा

इं डि6यल एसटेट, बी

आई डी के सामने,

गोरवा रोड,वडोदरा

390016

पैकेजबंद

पेयजल (अदर दैन

पैकेजड नेचुरल िमनरल

वाटर)

14543

-

-

2004

16

7200029599

26/11/2015

उS नित वायर

इंड 6ीज

सव नंबर.37 तथा

38, देहगाम रोड,

जारोल, ता निडयाड,

खेडा 387230

माईलड  टील वायर,

फारमड वायर तथा

टेपस फार आरम9रग

आफ केबले

3975

-

-

1999

17

7200029805

26/11/2015

पाथ& डैकोर ;ा

िलिमटेड

 लाट नंबर.186,

ग<व कुकास, मेहसाना

िवजापुर रोड,

शोभासन चार र ता

के पास,

मेहसाना 384001

 लाईवुड फार जनरल

परपस

303

-

-

1989

18

7200028904

26/11/2015

एन बी ई मोटस& ;ा

िलिमटेड

1 to 7, ितhपित

एसटेट बाJ बे

हाउCसग के सामने,

िमलन िसनेमा

रोड,सरसपुर,

अहमदाबाद

380024

इंड शन मोटस& –एनजR

एफA श'ट `ी फेस

सकवीरल केज

12615

-

-

2011

19

7200029094

26/11/2015

हीर इंड 6ीज

11, रेवाभाई एसटेट-2

पूरकादीप सोसाइटी के

पीछे,

ल5 मभाई एसटेट के

सामने, अमराईवाडी

अहमदाबाद 380026

सबमKसबल पJ पसैट

8034

-

-

2002

20

7200029195

26/11/2015

पा7 व& इंजीिनयस&

26  वामीनारायण

ल'िडग वालवस

5290

-

-

1993

2304

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

एसटेट, िचराग

डायमंड के पीछे,

अिनल  टाच& रोड,

बापूनगर,अहमदाबाद

380025

21

7200029704

27/11/2015

पाथ& डैकोर ;ा

िलिमटेड

 लाट नंबर.186,

ग<व कुकास, मेहसाना

िवजापुर रोड,

शोभासन चार र ता

के पास,

मेहसाना 384001

वुडन फलश डोर शटस&

(सािलड कोर टाईप)

2202

1

-

1999

22

7200029498

30/11/2015

लोखंडवाला िसमkट

;ोड टस

एस नंबर.682/पी,

ाम भारत  कूल

केपस, गोचर ठाकोर

वास के सामने,वांछ

गाम, ता दसMोई

अहमदाबाद 382449

;ीका ट कांMAट मेनहोल

कवर तथा Tेम

12592

-

-

2002

23

7200030281

30/11/2015

मालाबार गो1 ड ;ा

िलिमटेड

शॉप नंबर.101 तथा

201,

पहली तथा दूसरी

मिजल, केपीपलै:टना,

 लाजा हट के सामने,

रेस कोस& सक& ल,

वडोदरा 39007

 वण& तथा  वण& धातु*

के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी

शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन

1417

-

-

1999

[la- lh ,e Mh@13%11]

डॉ- एस- एल- पालकर] ] ] ] वै6ािनक ‘एफ’ एवं ;मुख

New Delhi, the 25th April, 2016

S.O. 1032.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (5) of the regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards (

Certification) Regulations 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars of

which are given in the following schedule:

SCHEDULE

Sl.

No.

Licences

No.

Grant Date

Name & Address of the party

Title of the

Standard

IS

No.

Part

Sec

Year

1

7200027393

02/11/2015

VISAT HEALTH CARE

SR.NO.13 TO

16,21,22,35,114,57

PAI-A/1, PLOT NO.A/1 ,

MARUTI INDL ESTATE, OPP.B

R C COLONY, BHEDWAD,

SURAT 394221.

Packaged

drinking water

(other than

packaged

natural mineral

water) -

14543

-

-

2004

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938

2305

2

7200027999

02/11/2015

GOLD LINE ORNAMENTS

PVT LTD

IST FLOOR, RONAK MARKET,

ST.WORKSHOP ROAD,

MEHSANA

Gold and gold

alloys,

jewellery/artefacts

-

fineness and

marking -

1417

-

-

1999

3

7200028092

03/11/2015

J J JEWELLERS

NEAR SUBHAS CHOWK

TOWER

TALOD, SABARKANTHA

383215

Gold and gold

alloys,

jewellery/artefacts

-

fineness and

marking -

1417

-

-

1999

4

7200027898

03/11/2015

HARI OM INDUSTRIES

PLOT NO.448, ROAD NO.11

KATHWADA, AHMEDABAD

382415

Motors for

submersible

pumpsets -

9283

-

-

2013

5

7200030079

06/11/2015

NISHU PAVERS

BLOCK NO.1824, CHIKHLI-

VASDA ROAD

NEAR HANS QUARY, OPP.

RAJ CHEMICALS, VILLAGE-

ALIPORE

Tal-CHIKHLI. NAVSARI

396521

Precast concrete

blocks for paving

15658

-

-

2006

6

7200028294

09/11/2015

HARIOM WOOD PRODUCTS

18/A, ZAK INDUSTRIAL

AREA, VILL ZAK, PO

PARDHOL, TAL DEHEGAM

GANDHINAGAR 382325

Marine plywood

710

-

-

2010

7

7200028597

09/11/2015

MILAN JEWELLERS

PLOT C-4, SHOP NO.3,

GRAND CASTLE BUILDING,

KOPARLI

ROAD,GIDC, VAPI, VALSAD

396195

Gold and gold

alloys,

jewellery/artefacts

-

fineness and

marking -

1417

-

-

1999

8

7200028496

10/11/2015

SUVARNAKALA PVT. LTD.

101, NATIONAL PLAZA

OPP: SUPERMALL, C G ROAD

AHMEDABAD-380006

Silver and silver

alloys,

jewellery/artefacts

-

fineness and

marking

2112

-

-

2003

9

7200028395

16/11/2015

SHIVAM FOODS &

BEVERAGES

9,10 SOMESHWAR COMPLEX

KUNDAL VILLAGE,

MEHSANA, KADI 382715

Packaged

drinking water

(other than

packaged

natural mineral

water) -

14543

-

-

2004

2306

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

10

7200027191

19/11/2015

BOOST PLASTO TECHNICS

SURVEY NO.89/1, N,H, 14,

DEESA

HIGHWAY ROAD, OPP.HOTEL

GREEN

WOOD

BADARPURA(KODALA

TAL: PALANPUR 385001

Unplasticized pvc

screen and casing

pipes for

bore/tubewell

12818

-

-

2010

11

7200028698

20/11/2015

GEETA ENGINNERING CO

D/66, DIAMOND PARK,

NARODA GIDC ESTATE,

NARODA, AHMEDABAD

380025

Motors for

submersible

pumpsets -

9283

-

-

2013

12

7200028799

20/11/2015

PARNIL INDUSTRIES

PLOT NO.82/9/A, PHASE 1

GIDC VATVA, AHMEDABAD

382445

Single-phase

small ac and

universal electric

motors

996

-

-

2009

13

7200028803

20/11/2015

VIDYA PUMP INDUSTRIES

SHED NO.13, SYMPHONY

ESTATE

BEHIND INGERSOLE.PH-1,

GIDC

NARODA, AHMEDABAD

Submersible

pumpsets

8034

-

-

2002

14

7200029397

23/11/2015

BARODA AGRO CHEMICALS

LIMITED, SURVEY NO.40,

YASHKAMAL INDUSTRIAL

ESTATE, BASKA-TAJPURA

ROAD, V: PANELAV

TA: HALOL, PANCHMAHALS

389350

Mancozeb water

dispersible

powder

concentrates

8708

-

-

2006

15

7200029296

24/11/2015

SHREEJI BEVERAGES

C/41/191 KRISHNA INDL

ESTATE

OPP BIDC,GORWA ROAD

VADODARA 390016

Packaged

drinking water

(other than

packaged

natural mineral

water) -

14543

-

-

2004

16

7200029599

26/11/2015

UNNATI WIRE INDUSTRIES

SURVEY NO.37 & 38,

DEHGAM ROAD,

ZAROL, TAL: NADIAD,

KHEDA 387230

Mild steel wires,

formed wires and

tapes for

armouring of

cables

3975

-

-

1999

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938

2307

17

7200029805

26/11/2015

PARTH DECOR PVT LTD

PLOT NO.186, VILLAGE:

KUKAS

MEHSANA-VIJAPUR ROAD

NEAR SHOBHASAN CHAR

RASTA

MEHSANA 384001

Plywood for

general purposes

303

-

-

1989

18

7200028904

26/11/2015

NBE Motors Pvt Ltd

1 to 7,TIRUPATI ESTATE

OPP BOMBAY HOUSING

MILAN CINEMA

ROAD,SARASPUR

AHMADABAD 380024

Induction motors

- energy efficient,

three-phase,

squirrel cage -

12615

-

-

2011

19

7200029094

26/11/2015

HEER INDUSTRIES

11, REVABHAI ESTATE-2

BEHJIND PURCA DEEP

SOCIETY

OPP LAXAMBHAI ESTATE

AMARAIWADI, AHMEDABAD

380026

Submersible

pumpsets

8034

-

-

2002

20

7200029195

26/11/2015

PARSHW ENGINEERS

26 SWAMINARAYAN

ESTATE,

B/H CHIRAG DIAMOND,

ANIL STARCH ROAD,

BAPUNAGAR,AHMEDABAD

380025

Landing valves

5290

-

-

1993

21

7200029704

27/11/2015

PARTH DECOR PVT LTD

PLOT NO.186, VILLAGE:

KUKAS

MEHSANA-VIJAPUR ROAD

NEAR SHOBHASAN CHAR

RASTA

MEHSANA 384001

Wooden flush

door shutters

(solid core type):

2202

1

-

1999

22

7200029498

30/11/2015

LOKHANDWALA CEMENT

PRODUCTS

S NO.682/P,BESIDE GRAM

BHARTI

SCHOOL, OPP.GOCHAR,

THAKOR VAS, VANCHH GAM

Tal:DASKROI, AHMEDABAD

382449

Precast concrete

manhole cover

and frame -

12592

-

-

2002

2308

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

23

7200030281

30/11/2015

MALABAR GOLD PVT LTD

SHOP NO.101 AND 201,

1ST AND 2ND FLOOR

KPPLATINA, OPP PIZZA

HUT, RACE COURSE CIRCLE

VADODARA 39007

Gold and gold

alloys,

jewellery/artefacts

-

fineness and

marking -

1417

-

-

1999

[No. CMD/13:11]

Dr. S. L. PALKAR, Scientist ‘F’ & Head

ubZ fnYyh] 25 vizSy] 2016

dk-vk- 1033-—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks (izek.ku) fofu;e 1988 ds fofu;e (5) ds mifofu;e (6) ds vuqlj.k esa

Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks ,rn~}kjk vf/klwfpr djrk gS fd fuEu fooj.k okys ykblsalksa dks muds vkxs n”kkZ;h xbZ rkjh[k ls

jn~n/LFkfxr dj fn;k x;k gS :-

vu

vu

vu

vuqlwph

lwph

lwph

lwph

dze

la[;k

Ykkblsal la[;k

lh,e/,y-

Ykkblsal/kkjh dk uke o Ikrk

Ykkblsal ds varxZr oLrq /izde

lEc}

Hkkjrh; ekud dk “kh"kZd

jn~n djus dh

frfFk

1

7200017895

मैसस& योको टोन कां:टन'टल िलिमटेड

सव नंबर. 785पी, कोठ, बागोदरा,

तारापुररोड, आरनेज ग<व के पास,

अहमदाबाद

आटोमो:टव िवहीकल- टयूबस फार

S यूमै:टक टायर

आई एस 13098:2012

18/11/2015

[la- lh ,e Mh@13%13]

डॉ- एस- एल- पालकर] ] ] ] वै6ािनक ‘एफ’ एवं ;मुख

New Delhi, the 25th April, 2016

S.O. 1033.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (6) of the regulation 5 of the Bureau of Indian Standards

(Certification) Regulations 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies that the licences particulars of which

are given below have been cancelled with effect from the date indicated against each:

SCHEDULE

Sl.

No.

Licences

No.

CM/L-

Name & Address of the Licensee

Article/Process with

relevant Indian Standards

covered by the licence

cancelled

Date of

Cancellation

1

7200017895

M/s YOKOSTONE CONTINENTAL LIMITED

SURVEY NO. 785P, KOTH, BAGODRA

TARAPUR ROAD, NEAR ARNEJ VILLAGE

AHMEDABAD

Automotive Vehicles-

Tubes for pneumatic tyres

IS 13098:2012

18/11/2015

[No. CMD/13:13]

Dr. S. L. PALKAR, Scientist ‘F’ & Head

ubZ fnYyh] 20 ebZ] 2016

dk-vk- 1034-—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks (izek.ku) fofu;e 1988 ds fofu;e 6 ds mifofu;e (3) ds vuqlj.k esa Hkkjrh;

ekud C;wjks ,rn~}kjk uhps vuqlwph esa fn, x, mRikn dh eqgjkadu “kqYd vf/klwfpr djrk gS :-

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938

2309

vu

vu

vu

vuqlwph

lwph

lwph

lwph

Hkkjrh;

ekud

la-

Hkkx

vuqHkkx

o"kZ

mRikn

bdkbZ

U;wure eqgjkadu “kqYd

¼#-½

bdkbZ

nj

LySc 1

¼#-½

LySc esa

bdkbZ;ka

“ks"k

izpkyu

frfFk

o`gn

Lrj

,e,l,ebZ

ds fy,

73

&

&

2013

[kaMtk

Mkyus ds

fy, Mkej

& fof”kf"V

¼pkSFkk

iqujh{k.k½

eS- Vu

72000-00

58000-00

24-00

lHkh

& 18-05-2016

12591

&

&

2006

vrIr &

y?kqd`r

fo|qr

vi?kVuh

Øksfe;e

vkWDlkbM

& ysfir

bLikr

¼igyk

iqujh{k.k½

eS- Vu

46000-00

37000-00

5-40

lHkh

& 18-05-2016

16186

&

&

2014

oL=kfn &

50 fdxzk

[kk|kUu

iSd djus

ds fy,

gYds Hkkj

okys iVlu

ds cksjs &

fof”kf"V

eS- Vu

49000-00

40000-00

6-30

lHkh

& 18-05-2016

10065

&

&

1981

Hkquh gqbZ

eqxaQyh dh

xqByh

1 fdxzk

54000-00

44000-00

0-15

lHkh

& 18-05-2016

[lanHkZ la- lh ,e Mh&2@th&18]

lh- ds- egs”ojh] oSKkfud ^th* ,oa miegkfuns”kd ¼izek.ku½

New Delhi, the 20th May, 2016

S.O. 1034.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (3) of the regulation 6 of the Bureau of Indian Standards

(Certification) Regulations 1988, the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies the Marking fee for the product given

in the Schedule :

SCHEDULE

IS No.

Part

Sec

Year

Product

Units

Minimum Marking Fee (Rs.)

Unit

Rate

Slab-1

Fee

(Rs.)

Units

in

Slab-

1

Rema-

ining

Effective Date

Large Scale

MSME

73

-

-

2013

Paving Bitumen –

Specification

(Forth Revison)

One

MT

72000.00

78000.00

24.00

All

-

18.05.2016

2310

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

12591

-

-

2006

Cold-Reduced

Electrolytic

Chromium/

chromium Oxide –

Coated Steel (First

Revison)

One

MT

46000.00

37000.00

5.40

All

-

18.05.2016

16186

-

-

2014

Textiles – Light

Weight Jute

Sacking Bags for

Packing 50 kg

Foodgrains -

Specification

One

MT

49000.00

40000.00

6.30

All

-

18.05.2016

10065

-

-

1981

Roasted Groundnut

(Peanut) Kernels

One

Kg

54000.00

44000.00

0.15

All

-

18.05.2016

[Ref. No. CMD-2/G-18]

C. K. MAHESHWARI, Scientist ‘G’ & DDG (Certification)

ubZ fnYyh] 24 ebZ] 2016

dk-vk- 1035-—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks (izek.ku) fofu;e 1988 ds fu;e 4 ds mifu;e (5) ds vuqlj.k esa Hkkjrh;

ekud C;wjks ,rn~}kjk vf/klwfpr djrk gS fd ftu ykblsalksa ds fooj.k uhps vuqlwph esa fn, x, gS] os Lohd`r dj fn, x,

gSa %

vuq

vuq

vuq

vuqlwph

lwph

lwph

lwph

Øe

la[;k

Ykkblsal

la[;k

Lohd`r djus

dh frfFk

o"kZ@ekg

Ykkblsal/kkjh dk uke

o Ikrk

Hkkjrh; ekud dk

“kh"kZd

Hkk ek

la[;k

Hkkx

vuq

o"kZ

1

7200015588

04/06/2015

जावेरी तथा कंपनी

(गुजरात)एल एल पी

13 बी नाध नंबर

285/288,  लाट नंबर

9 S यू नंबर 2349,

जावेरी हाउस, आई

डी बी आई ब'क के

पास, गोड डोड रोड

अथवालाlस, सूरत

395007

 वण& तथा  वण& धातु*

के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी

शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन

1417

-

-

1999

2

7200015891

08/06/2015

आभूषण,

कृ@ णा एसटेट के

सामने, कृ@ णानगर

रोड, नरोडा रोड,

अहदाबाद 382345

 वण& तथा  वण& धातु*

के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी

शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन

1417

-

-

1999

3

7200015992

10/06/2015

एरोयो एंटर;ाईस

सव नंबर 9,  लाट नंबर

10, 11, 2,14, 15

साई कृपा इंडि6यल

एसटेट, अंजाना,

सूरत 395002

पैकेजबंद

पेयजल (अदर दैन

पैकेजड नेचुरल िमनरल

वाटर)

14543

-

-

2004

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938

2311

4

7200016085

10/06/2015

नवपाड केबल

50, ितhपित एसटेट,

मुS नी मिजद के

पास , सरसपुर,

अहमदाबाद 380018

पी वी सी इंसूले:टड

केबल

694

-

-

1990

5

7200015790

10/06/2015

िववान  टीलस ;ा

िलिमटेड

यूनीमाक& रैमेिडस के

सामने, केराला के

पास, जी आई डी सी,

केराला,

बावला,अहमदाबाद

 टील फार जनरल

 टकचरल परपस

2062

-

-

2011

6

7200016388

10/06/2015

:रवर िबवरेिजस,

बी/20, अट:रया

िबजनेस जोन िजCनग

;ेस बी आर टी एस

बस  ट'ड अरCवद िमल

कंपाउंड के सामने,

मैमको कालूपुर रोड,

नरोडा रोड

अहमदाबाद 382330

पैकेजबंद

पेयजल (अदर दैन

पैकेजड नेचुरल िमनरल

वाटर)

14543

-

-

2004

7

7200016287

15/06/2015

h_ा डायमंडस तथा

जवैलरी

यू -11, जोली शॉCपग

पाlट, गोड डोड रोड

सूरत-395007

 वण& तथा  वण& धातु*

के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी

शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन

1417

-

-

1999

8

7200016691

15/06/2015

डी आर जवैलस&

3,4 मंगलदास शॉCपग

स'टर, O, कमल पाक&

सोसाइटी के पीछे,

र'डर

पी ओ सूरत 390005

 वण& तथा  वण& धातु*

के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी

शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन

1417

-

-

1999

9

7200017390

15/06/2015

अ>र इंड 6ीज

38, कृ@ णा एसटेट,

बी ओ सी गैस के

पीछे, पS ना एसटेट

रोड, सोनी कA चाली

के पास रिखयाल,

ओढव, अहमदाबाद

Cसगल फेस  माल ए सी

तथा यूिनवस&ल

इलैि6क मोटस&

996

-

-

2009

10

7200016186

16/06/2015

धीरज पाली ला ट

6, ;ाथ&ना एसटेट,

ओढव फायर  टेशन के

पीछे, अहमदाबाद

382841

इरीगेशन इ यूपम'ट –

रोटे9टग  ;ीलंकर पाट&

1 िडजाईन तथा

ओपरे7 नल :रकवायरम'ट

12232

1

-

1996

11

7200016792

17/06/2015

डी टी जवैलस&

 वण& तथा  वण& धातु*

के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी

1417

-

-

1999

2312

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

3-4153 बी,

बुंदेलुवाड, भागल

लाड शेरी, पहली

मंिजल,सूरत

395003

शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन

12

7200016893

17/06/2015

जावेरी तथा कंपनी

(गुजरात)एल एल पी

10 इसकान स'टर,

सैटेलाईट रोड,

जोधपुर, अहमदाबाद

380015

 वण& तथा  वण& धातु*

के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी

शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन

1417

-

-

1999

13

7200017289

17/06/2015

पूजा इंिजिनयं9रग

वकस&

191, शंकर एसटेट,

सूरेिलया रोड के पास,

रेवाभाई एसटेट के

पास, अमराईवाडी,

अहमदाबाद

380026

ओपनवैल सबमKसबल

पJ पसैट

14220

-

-

1994

14

7200016489

17/06/2015

ओम माकाnडे7 वर

जवैलस&,

एम यू नंबर.4/392,

छोटा बाजार,

अंकले7 वर,िडि6कट

भाhच 393001

 वण& तथा  वण& धातु*

के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी

शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन -

1417

-

-

1999

15

7200016590

19/06/2015

ज'सन िवनीयर  लाई

िबपीको इंड 6ीज के

सामने, िबलीमोरा

िचखली

रोड, एट नंदार>ा,

नवसारी, िबलीमोरा

396325

 लाईवुड फार जनरल

परपस

303

-

-

1989

16

7200016994

19/06/2015

गुजरात रा8फया

इंड 6ीज िलिमटेड,

455, सांतेज वडसर

रोड, ग<व सांतेज, ता

कलोल, गांधीनगर

382721

टै सटाईलस – हाई

ड'िसटी पॉलीथलीन

(एच डी पी ई)

/पाली;ापिलन (पी पी)

वोवन सैक फार पैWकग

50 8कला ाम/25

8कला ाम फुड ेन

14887

-

-

2014

17

7200017087

19/06/2015

गुजरात रा8फया

इंड 6ीज िलिमटेड,

455, सांतेज वडसर

रोड, ग<व सांतेज, ता

कलोल, गांधीनगर

382721

ए ो टैकसटाईल- हाई

ड'िसटी पालीथलीन

(एच डी पी ई) वोवन

बैडस फार वैनीकलचर

15907

-

-

2010

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938

2313

18

7200017188

19/06/2015

क1 पना जवैलस&

बि़ढयादेव मं8दर के

पास , गणेश चौक,

पादरा

वडोदरा

 वण& तथा  वण& धातु*

के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी

शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन

1417

-

-

1999

19

7200017491

22/06/2015

माईMा होम

एपलाईCसस

इंडि6यल  लाट

नंबर. 03, jSosUयू

L लाक नंबर 1871,

खेरावा ( पुराना आर

एस नंबर 1705/2,

खेरवा संगलपुर रोड,

एट खेरवा, ता

मेहसाना, गुजरात

382711

रॉट एलयूिनयम

यू ट'िसल

1660

-

-

2009

20

7200017794

22/06/2015

योको टोन कांटीन'टल

िलिमटेड

सव नंबर. 785 पी ,

कोठ बागोदरा

तारापुर रोड,

आरनेज के पास,

अहमदाबाद

साईकल रबर टयूबस

2415

-

-

2004

21

7200017592

29/06/2015

नासा फायर

टैकनोलोजी िलिमटेड

24, Eीजी इंडि6यल

एसटेट

शांते7 वर महादेव के

पीछे, सोनी कA चाल

के पास, एन एच नंबर

8, रिखयाल,

अहमदाबाद 380023

पोटेबल फायर

ए स9टग7 र -

परफारम'स तथा

कंस6कशन

15683

-

-

2006

22

7200017895

22/06/2015

योको टोन कांटीन'टल

िलिमटेड

सव नंबर. 785 पी,

कोठ बागोदरा

तारापुर रोड,

आरनेज के पास,

अहमदाबाद

ऑटोमो:टव िविहकल-

टयूबस फार S यूमै:टक

टायर

13098

-

-

2012

23

7200017996

29/06/2015

रामे7 वर जवैलस&

46, बी जी 6ेड स'टर,

पंचबटी,भाhच

392001

 वण& तथा  वण& धातु*

के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी

शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन

1417

-

-

1999

2314

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

24

7200017693

29/06/2015

मनोजकुमार

रमनलाल सोनी

शॉप नंबर .37/1/2,

साकडीशेरी के सामने,

मानेक चौक,

अहमदाबाद

 वण& तथा  वण& धातु*

के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी

शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन

1417

-

-

1999

[la- lh ,e Mh@13%11]

डॉ- एस- एल- पालकर] ] ] ] वै6ािनक ‘एफ’ एवं ;मुख

New Delhi, the 24th May, 2016

S.O. 1035.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (5) of the regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards(

Certification) Regulations 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars of

which are given in the following schedule:

SCHEDULE

Sl.

No.

Licences

No.

Grant Date

Name & Address of the party

Title of the

Standard

IS

No.

Part

Sec

Year

1

7200015588

04/06/2015

ZAVERI AND

COMPANY(GUJARAT) LLP

13 B NONDH NO 285/288,

PLOT NO 9 NEW NO 2349,

ZAVERI HOUSE NEAR IDBI

BANK, GHOD DOD ROAD

ATHWALINES SURAT 395007

Gold and gold

alloys, jewellery/

artefacts -

fineness and

marking -

1417

-

-

1999

2

7200015891

08/06/2015

ABHUSHAN

OPP KRISHNA ESTATE

KRISHNANAGAR ROAD,

NARODA ROAD

Ahmedabad 382345

Gold and gold

alloys,

jewellery/artefacts

-

fineness and

marking -

1417

-

-

1999

3

7200015992

10/06/2015

ARROYO ENTERPRISE

SURVEY NO 9

PLOT NO. 10, 11, 12,14, 15

SAI KRUPA INDUSTRIAL

ESTATE

ANJANA,Surat 395002

Packaged

drinking water

(other than

packaged

natural mineral

water)

14543

-

-

2004

4

7200016085

10/06/2015

NAVPAD CABLE

50, TIRUPATI ESTATE,

NEAR MUNI MASJID

SARASPUR, AHMEDABAD

380018

Pvc insulated

cables

694

-

-

1990

5

7200015790

10/06/2015

VIVAN STEELS PVT LTD

OPPOSITE UNIMARK

REMEDIES

NEAR KERALA GIDC,

KERALA

BAVLA, AHMEDABAD

Steel for general

structural

purposes -

2062

-

-

2011

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938

2315

6

7200016388

10/06/2015

RIVER BEVERAGES

B/20, ATRIA BUSINESS ZONE

JINNING PRESS BRTS BUS

STAND

OPP. ARVIND MILL

COMPOUND

MEMCO-KALUPUR ROAD,

NARODA ROAD,Ahmedabad

382330

Packaged

drinking water

(other than

packaged

natural mineral

water)

14543

-

-

2004

7

7200016287

15/06/2015

RUDRA DIAMONDS &

JEWELLERY

U-11, JOLLY SHOPPING

POINT, GHOD-DOD ROAD

SURAT-395007

Gold and gold

alloys, jewellery/

artefacts -

fineness and

marking -

1417

-

-

1999

8

7200016691

15/06/2015

D R JEWELLERS

3,4 MANGALDAS SHOPPING

CENTRE

O, BEHIND KAMAL PARK

SOCIETY,

RANDER P O SURAT 390005

Gold and gold

alloys, jewellery/

artefacts -

fineness and

marking -

1417

-

-

1999

9

7200017390

15/06/2015

AKSHAR INDUSTRIES

38, KRISHNA ESTATE

BEHIND B.O.C GAS

PANNA ESTATE ROAD

NEAR SONI-NI-CHALI

RAKHIAL, ODHAV

AHMEDABAD

Single-phase

small ac and

universal electric

motors

996

-

-

2009

10

7200016186

16/06/2015

DHIRAJ POLI PLAST

6, PRATHANA ESTATE

BEHIND ODHAV FIRE

STATION

AHMEDABAD 382841

Irrigation

equipment -

rotating sprinkler:

part

1 design and

operational

requirements

12232

1

-

1996

11

7200016792

17/06/2015

D T JEWELLERS

3-4153 B,

BUNDELUWAD, BHAGAL

LAD SERI, IST FLOOR, SURAT

395003

Gold and gold

alloys,

jewellery/artefacts

-

fineness and

marking -

1417

-

-

1999

12

7200016893

17/06/2015

ZAVERI AND

COMPANY(GUJARAT)

LLP

10 ISHCON CENTRE,

SATELLITE ROAD

JODHPUR, AHMEDABAD

380015

Gold and gold

alloys, jewellery/

artefacts -

fineness and

marking -

1417

-

-

1999

13

7200017289

17/06/2015

POOJA ENGINEERING

WORKS

191, SHANKAR ESTATE

Openwell

submersible

pumpsets -

14220

-

-

1994

2316

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

NEAR SURELIYA ROAD

NEAR REVABHAI ESTATE

AMRAIWADI, AHMEDABAD

380026

14

7200016489

17/06/2015

OM MARKANDESHWAR

JEWELLERS

MU NO.4/392, CHAUTA

BAZAR,

ANKLESHWAR,DISTT

BHARUCH 393001

Gold and gold

alloys, jewellery/

artefacts -

fineness and

marking -

1417

-

-

1999

15

7200016590

19/06/2015

JENSON VENEERS PLY

OPP.BIPICO INDUSTRIES

BILIMORA-CHIKHLI ROAD

AT: NANDARKHA, Navsari

BILIMORA 396325

Plywood for

general purposes

303

-

-

1989

16

7200016994

19/06/2015

GUJARAT RAFFIA

INDUSTRIES LTD,

455,SANTEJ VADSAR ROAD,

Vill:SANTEJ, TALUKA KALOL

GANDHINAGAR 382721

Textiles — high

density

polyethylene

(hdpe) /

polypropylene

(pp) woven

sacksfor

packaging

of 50 kg food

grains —

14887

-

-

2014

17

7200017087

19/06/2015

GUJARAT RAFFIA

INDUSTRIES LIMITED

455, VADSAR ROAD, VI,

SANTEJ,

TA: KALOL,SABARKANTHA

KALOL 382721

Agro-textiles-

high density

polyethylene

(hdpe) woven

beds for

vermiculture

15907

-

-

2010

18

7200017188

19/06/2015

KALPANA JEWELLERS

NR BADYADEV

TEMPLE, GANESH

CHOWK,0,

PADRA, VADODARA

Gold and gold

alloys, jewellery/

artefacts -

fineness and

marking -

1417

-

-

1999

19

7200017491

22/06/2015

MICRA HOME

APPLIANCES

INDUSTRIAL PLOT NO. 03,

REVENUE

BLOCK NO 1871,

KHERAVA(OLD R S NO.

1705/2, KHERVA), KHERVA

SANGALPUR

ROAD,AT KHERVA TAL

MEHSANA

Gujarat 382711

Wrought

aluminium

utensils

1660

-

-

2009

20

7200017794

22/06/2015

YOKOSTONE CONTINENTAL

LIMITED

SURVEY NO. 785P, KOTH,

BAGODRA TARAPUR ROAD,

Cycle rubber

tubes -

2415

-

-

2004

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938

2317

NEAR ARNEJ, VILLAGE

AHMEDABAD

21

7200017592

29/06/2015

NASA FIRE TECHNOLOGY

LTD

24, SHREEJI INDUSTRIAL

ESTATE

B/H SHANTESHWAR

MAHADEV

NEAR SONI NI CHAL, N H NO

8

RAKHIAL AHMEDABAD

380023

Portable fire

extinguishers -

performance and

construction

15683

-

-

2006

22

7200017895

22/06/2015

YOKOSTONE CONTINENTAL

LIMITED

SURVEY NO. 785P, KOTH,

BAGODRA TARAPUR ROAD,

NEAR ARNEJ, VILLAGE

AHMEDABAD

Automotive

vehicles - tubes

for pneumatic

tyres

13098

-

-

2012

23

7200017996

29/06/2015

RAMESHWAR

JEWELLERS

46,B G TRADE CENTRE,

PANCHBATTI,

BHARUCH-392001

Gold and gold

alloys, jewellery/

artefacts -

fineness and

marking -

1417

-

-

1999

24

7200017693

29/06/2015

MANOJKUMAR

RAMANLAL SONI

SHOP NO.37/1/2, OPP

SAKDISHERI,

MANEKCHOWK,

AHMEDABAD

Gold and gold

alloys, jewellery/

artefacts -

fineness and

marking -

1417

-

-

1999

[No. CMD/13:11]

Dr. S. L. PALKAR, Scientist ‘F’ & Head

ubZ fnYyh] 24 ebZ] 2016

dk-vk- 1036-—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks (izek.ku) fofu;e 1988 ds fofu;e (5) ds mifofu;e (6) ds vuqlj.k esa

Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks ,rn~}kjk vf/klwfpr djrk gS fd fuEu fooj.k okys ykblsalksa dks muds vkxs n”kkZ;h xbZ rkjh[k ls

jn~n/LFkfxr dj fn;k x;k gS :-

vu

vu

vu

vuqlwph

lwph

lwph

lwph

dze

la[;k

Ykkblsal la[;k

lh,e/,y-

Ykkblsal/kkjh dk uke o Ikrk

Ykkblsal ds varxZr oLrq /izde

lEc) Hkkjrh; ekud dk

“kh"kZd

jn~n djus dh

frfFk

1

1988081

मैसस& 8दq या सिविचस ;ा िलिमटेड

C-1/174, जी आई डी सी, मेहसाना

384002

ि विचस फार डौमैिटक तथा

िसिमलर परपस

आई एस 3854 : 1997

01/06/2015

2318

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2

3866279

मैसस& मCह_ा इंड 6ीज

80,, 80/1, सांकर एसटेट, रेवाभाई

एसटेट के पीछे अमराईवाडी,

अहमदाबाद 380026

पी वी सी इंसूले:टड केबल

आई एस 694 : 1990

10/06/2015

[la- lh ,e Mh@13%13]

डॉ- एस- एल- पालकर] ] ] ] वै6ािनक ‘एफ’ एवं ;मुख

New Delhi, the 24th May, 2016

S.O. 1036.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (6) of the regulation 5 of the Bureau of Indian Standards

(Certification) Regulations 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies that the licences particulars of which

are given below have been cancelled with effect from the date indicated against each:

SCHEDULE

Sl.

No.

Licences

No.

CM/L-

Name & Address of the Licensee

Article/Process with

relevant Indian Standards

covered by the licence

cancelled

Date of

Cancellation

1

1988081

M/s DIVYA SWITCHES PVT.LTD.

C-1/174, GIDC, MAHESANA,

MAHESANA 384002

SWITCHES FOR

DOMESTIC

AND SIMILAR

PURPOSES

IS 3854 : 1997

01/06/2015

2

3866279

M/s MAHINDRA INDUSTRIES

80, 80/1, SANKAR ESTATE, BEHIND

REVABHAI ESTATE AMRAIWADI,

AHMADABAD

Distt : Ahmedabad

Gujarat,

380026

PVC INSULATED

CABLES

IS 694 : 1990

10/06/2015

[No. CMD/13:13]

Dr. S. L. PALKAR, Scientist ‘F’ & Head

ubZ fnYyh] 24 ebZ] 2016

dk-vk- 1037-—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks (izek.ku) fofu;e 1988 ds fu;e 4 ds mifu;e (5) ds vuqlj.k esa Hkkjrh;

ekud C;wjks ,rn~}kjk vf/klwfpr djrk gS fd ftu ykblsalksa ds fooj.k uhps vuqlwph esa fn, x, gS] os Lohd`r dj fn, x, gSa %

vuq

vuq

vuq

vuqlwph

lwph

lwph

lwph

Øe

la[;k

Ykkblsal

la[;k

Lohd`r djus

dh frfFk

o"kZ@ekg

Ykkblsal/kkjh dk uke

o Ikrk

Hkkjrh; ekud dk

“kh"kZd

Hkk ek

la[;k

Hkkx

vuq

o"kZ

1

7200018089

02/07/2015

ब'टले 8फ9टगस ;ा

िलिमटेड

 लाट नंबर.ए/29,

 वागत इंडि6यल

पाक&-1, कुलाड

धमाN वान रोड,

बै रोल (बजरंग)

ईरीगेशन इ यूपम'ट-

 टेनर टाईप 8फलटस&

12785

-

-

1994

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938

2319

ता दसMाय,

अहमदाबाद 382430

2

7200018190

02/07/2015

ब'टले 8फ9टगस ;ा

िलिमटेड

 लाट नंबर.ए/29,

 वागत इंडि6यल

पाक&-1, कुलाड

धमाN वान रोड,

बै रोल(बजरंग)

ता दसMाय,

अहमदाबाद 382430

ईरीगेशन इ यूपम'ट-

हाईaोसाइकलोन

8फलटस&

14743

-

-

1999

3

7200018998

06/07/2015

पु@ पम जवैलस&

38, महाN मा गांधी

माक ट, मेन बाजार,

वापी टाउन, िड

वलसाद, वापी

396191

 वण& तथा  वण& धातु*

के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी

शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन

1417

-

-

1999

4

7200018291

07/07/2015

फलोकैम पोली ला ट

;ा िलिमटेड

 लाट नंबर. ए-44,

 वागत इंडि6यल

पाक&,, कुजाड बैकरोल

रोड, गांव बाकरोल,

बजरंग,ता दसMाय,

अहमदाबाद 382430

 लो:रने:टड पी वी सी

पाईपस फार पोटेबल

हाट तथा को1 ड वाटर

िडि6L यूशन सपलाईस

15778

-

-

2007

5

7200018594

07/07/2015

सेजल Q वैलस&

यू जी 4-5 रंगीला

पाक&, गोड डोड रोड ,

सूरत 395003

 वण& तथा  वण& धातु*

के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी

शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन

1417

-

-

1999

6

7200018392

08/07/2015

जे एस फुड तथा

िबवरेिजस

 लाट नंबर.19. िसटी

सव नंबर. 3813,

मीरा सोसाइटी बंगला

ए:रया, कुबेर नगर,

अहमदाबाद

382340

पैकेजबंद

पेयजल (अदर दैन

पैकेजड नेचुरल िमनरल

वाटर)

14543

-

-

2004

7

7200018493

13/07/2015

िमलेिनयम इंटरने7 नल

 लाट नंबर. 5/82,

 यूरेश नगर, बादर

 लाजा के पीछे, रै ट

तथा राइड होटल के

पैकेजबंद

पेयजल (अदर दैन

पैकेजड नेचुरल िमनरल

वाटर)

14543

-

-

2004

2320

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

पीछे, मनपसंद पाल&र

के सामने, सरखेज रोड

अहमदाबाद 380055

8

7200018695

13/07/2015

के आर संस(एएचडी)

1, अिभषेक

काJ पलैकस,  टार

बाजार के सामने,

सैटेलाईट

अहमदाबाद 380015

 वण& तथा  वण& धातु*

के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी

शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन

1417

-

-

1999

9

7200018796

14/07/2015

कालीबाबू डायमkड

Q वैलस&

यू 8 धनल5 मी को ओ

हा,एस एल . 6 2213

टावर के पास,

नवसारी 396445

 वण& तथा  वण& धातु*

के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी

शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन

1417

-

-

1999

10

7200018897

16/07/2015

गीता इंिजिनय9रग

कJ पनी

डी/66, डायमंड पाक&,

नरोडा जी आई डी सी

एस् टेट, नरोडा,

अहमदाबाद 382330

सबमKसबल पJ पसैट

8034

-

-

2002

11

7200019091

20/07/2015

S यू  लािसक टार

पोिलन,

 लाट नंबर. 2214

तथा 2215,

जी आई डी सी,

अंबरग<व, वलसाद

396171

टै साटाईल टारपोिलन

मेड Tाम हाई डैनिसटी

पोलिथलीन वोवन

फैब:रक

7903

-

-

2011

12

7200019192

20/07/2015

बंसल िबC1डग

मै:ट:रयलस ;ा

िलिमटेड

एन एच नंबर.8,

मोती नारोली,सूरत

394110

;ीका ट कांMAट L लाकस

फार पेCवग

15658

-

-

2006

13

7200019596

23/07/2015

आभूषण जवैलस&

शॉप नंबर 28, ाम

पंचायत शॉCपग

स'टर, आरवाड,

पारडी, उडवाडा,

वलसाद 396185

 वण& तथा  वण& धातु*

के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी

शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन

1417

-

-

1999

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938

2321

14

7200019798

27/07/2015

कैरेट टाईलफाईन

जवैलरी ;ा िलिमटेड

फलैट नंबर . 202,

शॉपर  लाजा 6,

मS यूिसपल मा& केट के

सामने, सी जी रोड,

नवरंगपुरा

अहमदाबाद 380009

 वण& तथा  वण& धातु*

के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी

शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन

1417

-

-

1999

15

7200019394

28/07/2015

माधव ए ो फुड

इंड 6ीज

सव नंबर. 44, एट पी

ओ अंबागाम, ता

बायड,िड साबरकांटा

383325

पैकेजबंद

पेयजल (अदर दैन

पैकेजड नेचुरल िमनरल

वाटर)

14543

-

-

2004

16

7200019495

28/07/2015

जैलको इलै 6ािनकस

;ा िलिमटेड

142, ग<व कारोली,

एट तथा ता कलोल

गांधीनगर 382721

ि विचस फार डौमैिटक

तथा िसिमलर परपस

3854

-

-

1997

17

7200019697

29/07/2015

Eी महावीर एकवा

L लाक नंबर. 246.

 लाट नंबर. 11/28,

12, 12/बी,

कािवक नगर

इंडि6यल ए टेट

कारंज, ता मांडवी,

सूरत 394530

पैकेजबंद

पेयजल (अदर दैन

पैकेजड नेचुरल िमनरल

वाटर)

14543

-

-

2004

18

7200019899

29/07/2015

अकाईश ि;S टgग एs ड

 टेशनरी

 लाट नं 703/2,

जीआईडीसी ए टेट,

फेस 4, S यु जीईबी,

िवठल उiोग नगर,

अहमदाबाद, िजला :

आणंद 388121

पैकेजबंद

पेयजल (अदर दैन

पैकेजड नेचुरल िमनरल

वाटर)

14543

-

-

2004

19

7200019903

30/07/2015

अंगूठी जवैलस&

सी/10, ई7 वरचरण

काJ पलै स,

आलोक अपाट&म'ट के

सामने,जोधपुर

गाम, सैटेलाईट,

अहमदाबाद 380015

 वण& तथा  वण& धातु*

के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी

शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन

1417

-

-

1999

2322

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

20

7200019293

30/07/2015

आर एंड डी

मलटीपलस

(मैटल का ट) ;ा

िलिमटेड

 लांट II, सव नंबर

304, बालडा,पारडी

वलसाद 396125

 लूस वालव फार वाटर

व स& परपस (50 से

1200 एम एम साईज)

14846

-

-

2000

[la- lh ,e Mh@13%11]

डॉ- एस- एल- पालकर] ] ] ] वै6ािनक ‘एफ’ एवं ;मुख

New Delhi, the 24th May, 2016

S.O. 1037.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (5) of the regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards

(Certification) Regulations 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars of

which are given in the following schedule:

SCHEDULE

Sl.

No.

Licences

No.

Grant Date

Name & Address of the party

Title of the

Standard

IS

No.

Part

Sec

Year

1

7200018089

02/07/2015

BENTLAY FITTINGS PVT LTD

PLOT NO.A/29, SWAGAT

IND.PARK-1, KUJAD-

DHAMATVAN

ROAD, BAKROL(BUJRANG)

TAL:DASKROI, AHMEDABAD

382430

Irrigation

equipment -

strainer-type filters

12785

-

-

1994

2

7200018190

02/07/2015

BENTLAY FITTINGS PVT LTD

PLOT NO.A/29, SWAGAT

IND.PARK-1, KUJAD-

DHAMATVAN

ROAD, BAKROL(BUJRANG)

TAL:DASKROI, AHMEDABAD

382430

Irrigation

equipment –

hydrocyclone filters

14743

-

-

1999

3

7200018998

06/07/2015

PUSHPAM JEWELLERS

38, MAHATMA GANDHI MARKET

MAIN BAZAR,VAPI TOWN

DIST VALSAD, VAPI 396191

Gold and gold

alloys,

jewellery/artefacts -

fineness and

marking -

1417

-

-

1999

4

7200018291

07/07/2015

FLOWKEM POLYPLAST PVT

LIMITED

PLOT NO. A-44, SWAGAT

INDUSTRIAL PARK, KUJAD

BAKROL ROAD, VILLAGE

BAKROL,BUJRANG, TAL

DASKROI,

DISTT AHMEDABAD 382430

Chlorinated pvc

pipes for potable

hot and

cold water

distribution

supplies.

15778

-

-

2007

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938

2323

5

7200018594

07/07/2015

SEJAL JEWELLERS

U G 4-5 RANGILA PARK, GHOD

DOD ROAD , SURAT-395003

Gold and gold

alloys,

jewellery/artefacts -

fineness and

marking -

1417

-

-

1999

6

7200018392

08/07/2015

J S FOOD AND BEVERAGES

PLOT NO.19. CITY SURVEY NO.

3813, MEERA SOCIETY

BUNGLOW AREA,

KUBERNAGAR, AHMEDABAD

382340

Packaged drinking

water (other than

packaged

natural mineral

water)

14543

-

-

2004

7

7200018493

13/07/2015

MILLENNIUM INTERNATIONAL

PLOT NO. 5/82, QURESH

NAGAR, BEHIND BADAR PLAZA,

BEHIND REST & RIDE

HOTEL, OPP MANPASAND

PARLOUR,SARKHEJ ROAD

AHMEDABAD 380055

Packaged drinking

water (other than

packaged

natural mineral

water)

14543

-

-

2004

8

7200018695

13/07/2015

K R SONS (AHD)

1, ABHISHREE

COMPLEX,OPP STAR BAZAR

SETELLITE, AHMEDABAD 380015

Gold and gold

alloys,

jewellery/artefacts -

fineness and

marking -

1417

-

-

1999

9

7200018796

14/07/2015

KALIBABU DIAMOND JEWELS

U 8, DHANLAXMI CO H

S L. 6 2213

NEAR TOWER, NAVSARI 396445

Gold and gold

alloys,

jewellery/artefacts -

fineness and

marking -

1417

-

-

1999

10

7200018897

16/07/2015

GEETA ENGINEERING CO

D/66, DIAMOND PARK

NARODA GIDC ESTATE

NARODA, Ahmedabad 382330

Submersible

pumpsets -

8034

-

-

2002

11

7200019091

20/07/2015

NEW CLASSIC

TARPAULINE

PLOT NO. 2214& 2215,

GIDC, UMBERGAON

Valsad 396171

Textiles-tarpaulins

made from high

density

polyethylene woven

fabric

7903

-

-

2011

12

7200019192

20/07/2015

BANSAL BUILDING MATERIALS

PVT LTD

N. H. NO.8, MOTI NAROLI

SURAT, MOTI NAROLI- 394110

Precast concrete

blocks for paving

15658

-

-

2006

13

7200019596

23/07/2015

AABHUSHAN JEWELLERS

SHOP NO. 28, GRAMPANCHAYAT

SHOPPING CENTRE, ORWAD,

PARDI, UDWADA, VALSAD

396185

Gold and gold

alloys,

jewellery/artefacts -

fineness and

marking -

1417

-

-

1999

14

7200019798

27/07/2015

CARATSTYLE FINE JEWELLERY

PRIVATE LIMITED

FLAT NO. 202, SHOPPER PLAZA 6,

Gold and gold

alloys,

jewellery/artefacts -

1417

-

-

1999

2324

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

OPP MUNICIPAL MARKET, C G

ROAD,

NAVRANGPURA,AHMEDABAD

380009

fineness and

marking -

15

7200019394

28/07/2015

MADHAV AGRO FOOD

INDUSTRIES

SURVEY NO. 44, AT PO

AMBAGAM, TAL BAYAD, DISTT

SABARKANTHA, BAYAD 383325

Packaged drinking

water (other than

packaged

natural mineral

water)

14543

-

-

2004

16

7200019495

28/07/2015

GELCO ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD.

142, VILLAGE: KAROLI

AT & TAL: KALOL

GANDHINAGAR - 382721

Switches for

domestic and

similar purposes

3854

-

-

1997

17

7200019697

29/07/2015

SHREE MAHAVIR AQUA

BLOCK NO. 246. PLOT NO. 11/28,

12, 12/B,

KAVIK NAGAR INDL. ESTATE

KARANJ, TAL MANDVI

SURAT- 394530

Packaged drinking

water (other than

packaged

natural mineral

water)

14543

-

-

2004

18

7200019899

29/07/2015

AKAAISH PRINTING &

STATIONERY

PLOT NO.703/2, GIDC ESTATE

PHASE IV, NEW GEB, VITHAL

UDYOGNAGAR, ANAND-388121

Packaged drinking

water (other than

packaged

natural mineral

water)

14543

-

-

2004

19

7200019903

30/07/2015

ANGUTHI JEWELLERS

C/10, ISHWARCHARAN

COMPLEX

OPP ALOK APARTMENT,

JODHPUR

GAM ROAD SATELLITE

AHMEDABAD-380015

Gold and gold

alloys,

jewellery/artefacts -

fineness and

marking -

1417

-

-

1999

20

7200019293

30/07/2015

R&D MULTIPLES

(METAL CAST) PVT. LTD.

PLANT II, SURVEY

NO. 304, BALDA

PARDI, Valsad

PARDI, Gujarat-

396125

Sluice valve for

water works

purposes (50 to

1200 mm size) -

14846

-

-

2000

[No. CMD/13:11]

Dr. S. L. PALKAR, Scientist ‘F’ & Head

ubZ fnYyh] 24 ebZ] 2016

dk-vk- 1038-—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks (izek.ku) fofu;e 1988 ds fofu;e (5) ds mifofu;e (6) ds vuqlj.k esa

Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks ,rn~}kjk vf/klwfpr djrk gS fd fuEu fooj.k okys ykblsalksa dks muds vkxs n”kkZ;h xbZ rkjh[k ls

jn~n/LFkfxr dj fn;k x;k gS :-

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938

2325

vu

vu

vu

vuqlwph

lwph

lwph

lwph

dze

la[;k

Ykkblsal la[;k

lh,e/,y-

Ykkblsal/kkjh dk uke o Ikrk

Ykkblsal ds varxZr oLrq /izde

lEc}

Hkkjrh; ekud dk “kh"kZd

jn~n djus dh

frfFk

1

3891682

मैसस& अथ& ;ोड टस

 लाट नंबर 5017, मेगमणी चोकडी के

पास, जी आईडी सी, अंकले7 वर,

िड भाhच-393002

Cसथै:टक फुड कलर ;ीपरेशन तथा

िम सचर

आई एस 5346 : 1994

30/07/2015

[la- lh,eMh@13%13]

डॉ- एस- एल- पालकर] ] ] ] वै6ािनक ‘एफ’ एवं ;मुख

New Delhi, the 24th May, 2016

S.O. 1038.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (6) of the regulation 5 of the Bureau of Indian Standards(

Certification) Regulations 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies that the licences particulars of which

are given below have been cancelled with effect from the date indicated against each:

SCHEDULE

Sl.

No.

Licences

No.

CM/L-

Name & Address of the Licensee

Article/Process with

relevant Indian Standards

covered by the licence

cancelled

Date of

Cancellation

1

3891682

M/s ARTH PRODUCTS

PLOT NO. 5017, NEAR MEGMANI CHOWKDI,

G.I.D.C. ANKLESHWAR,

ANKLESHWAR

Distt : Bharuch-393002

synthetic food colour -

preparations and

mixtures

IS 5346 : 1994

30/07/2015

[No. CMD/13:13]

Dr. S. L. PALKAR, Scientist ‘F’ & Head

ubZ fnYyh] 24 ebZ] 2016

dk-vk- 1039-—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks (izek.ku) fofu;e 1988 ds fu;e 4 ds mifu;e (5) ds vuqlj.k esa Hkkjrh;

ekud C;wjks ,rn~}kjk vf/klwfpr djrk gS fd ftu ykblsalksa ds fooj.k uhps vuqlwph esa fn, x, gS] os Lohd`r dj fn, x, gSa %

vuq

vuq

vuq

vuqlwph

lwph

lwph

lwph

Øe

la[;k

Ykkblsal

la[;k

Lohd`r djus

dh frfFk

o"kZ@ekg

Ykkblsal/kkjh dk uke

o Ikrk

Hkkjrh; ekud dk

“kh"kZd

Hkk ek

la[;k

Hkkx

vuq

o"kZ

1

7200020076

03/08/2015

मैगनम ए ी इ यूपम'ट

;ा. िलिमटेड

सव नंबर 16

पी2/पी1/पी1, ग<व

मालगाड

ता1 लुका: डीसा,

बनसकांटा-385535

ईरीगेशन इ यूपम'ट-

पालीथलीन पाईपस

फार इरीगेशन लेटरलस

12786

-

-

1989

2326

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2

7200020379

06/08/2015

आई Eी खोिडयार

जवैलस&

4, सuयोग अपाट&म'ट,

S यू सामा रोड,

आभूषण के

पास,चोकडी वडोदरा

 वण& तथा  वण& धातु*

के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी

शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन

1417

-

-

1999

3

7200020177

07/08/2015

गुजरात Mाफट

इंड 6ीज िलिमटेड

431, सांतेज वडसर

रोड, सांतेज

गांधीनगर, ता कलोल

382721

टै सटाईलस – हाई

ड'िसटी पॉलीथलीन

(एच डी पी ई)

/पाली;ापिलन (पी पी)

वोवन सैक फार पैWकग

50 8कला ाम/

25 8कला ाम फुड ेन

14887

-

-

2014

4

7200020278

07/08/2015

जानकA पJ पस

2, 7, कुमार

इंडि6यल एसटेट,

शायोना एसटेट के

पास, कृ@ णा

काJ पलै स के साथ,

नरोडा रोड

अहमदाबाद 380025

ओपनवैल सबमKसबल

पJ पसैट

14220

-

-

1994

5

7200020480

10/08/2015

साईकमल पैकेजड

CaWकग वाटर,

नवा रोड, खेरगाम, ता

खेरगाम, ता िचखली

नवसारी-396040

पैकेजबंद

पेयजल (अदर दैन

पैकेजड नेचुरल िमनरल

वाटर)

14543

-

-

2004

6

7200020581

11/08/2015

एईरा यूरो आटोमेशन

;ा. िलिमटेड

 लाट नंबर 123,124,

एईरा एसटेट

सैकयू:रटी एसटेट के

पीछे, काशीराम

टै सटाईल िमल के

पास, नारोल रोड,

अहमदाबाद-

382405

ए सपलोिसव

एटमास8फयस& पाट& 1

इकयूपम'ट ;ोटै शन

बाई फलेम;ुफ

एनकलोसस& "डी"

60079

1

-

2006

7

7200020783

11/08/2015

इंटरगो1 ड जैJ स ;ा

िलिमटेड

ओरा शिF िनवास,

 वािसतक Mास

रोड,सी जी रोड

नवरंगपुरा,

अहमदाबाद-380009

 वण& तथा  वण& धातु*

के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी

शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन

1417

-

-

1999

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938

2327

8

7200020884

11/08/2015

इंटरगो1 ड जैJ स ;ा.

िलिमटेड

एल जी -बी, जी-बी,

वै ट 8फलड माल,

सूया&8करण काJ पलैकस

के सामने, गोड डोड

रोड, सूरत- 395001

 वण& तथा  वण& धातु*

के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी

शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन

1417

-

-

1999

9

7200021078

11/08/2015

पारी ए ो त था

एलाईड इंड 6ीज

172, जी आई डी सी

एसटेट, नरोडा

अहमदाबाद-382330

 टील फार जनरल

 टकचल& परपस

2062

-

-

2011

10

7200020682

12/08/2015

संगीर  लािटक ;ा.

िलिमटेड

सव 146/पी2, रेमंड

िलिमटेड के पास, ग<व

मोतीवाड, वलसाद,

ता. पारडी -396125

पालीथलीन पाईपस

फार दा सपलाई आफ

गैिसयस फयूलस

14885

-

-

2001

11

7200021280

17/08/2015

;कृित  टीलस ;ा.

िलिमटेड

सव नंबर 823,

राजोडा, अहमदाबाद

राजकोट हाइवे के

पास, ता बावला,

अहमदाबाद-382220

यू पी वी सी पाइप फार

पोटेबल वाटर

सपलाईस-

4985

-

-

2000

12

7200021381

19/08/2015

पावर व1 ड

इलै 6ािनकस

96, महाल5 मी

एसटेट, भा4 योदया के

सामने,

होटल सरखेज सानंद

रोड, सरखेज,

अहमदाबाद-382210

िमनी डोमैिटक वाटर

हीटर फार यूस वीद एल

पी जी

15558

-

-

2005

13

7200021179

19/08/2015

नेटा8फम इरीगेशन

इंिडया ;ा. िलिमटेड

268-270 & 271-

बी, जी आई डी सी.

मंजूसर,सावली

वडोदरा-391775

फ टलाईजर तथा

कैिमकल इनजै टर

िस टम

14483

1

-

1997

14

7200020985

19/08/2015

कृ@ णा एकवा

 लाट नंबर.8, आनंद

पैकेजबंद यजल (अदर

दैन पैकेजड नेचुरल

िमनरल वाटर)

14543

-

-

2004

2328

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

वाडी, राबी

काJ पलै स के पीछे,

संतादेवी रोड,

नवसारी-396445

15

7200021785

19/08/2015

रािधका Q वैलस&

ए-13, माhित

काJ पलै स, एस जे

रोड,

िस2पुर, िड पाटन

384151

 वण& तथा  वण& धातु*

के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी

शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन

1417

-

-

1999

16

7200021482

24/08/2015

;कृित  टीलस ;ा.

िलिमटेड

सव नंबर 823,

राजोडा, अहमदाबाद

राजकोट हाइवे के

पास, ता बावला,

अहमदाबाद-382220

सोलव'ट िसमkट फार यूस

िवद अन लािटसाईजड

पालीिवनाईल लोराइड

िटक पाईप तथा

8फ9टग

14182

-

-

1994

17

7200021583

24/08/2015

;कृित  टीलस ;ा.

िलिमटेड

सव नंबर 823,

राजोडा, अहमदाबाद

राजकोट हाइवे के

पास, ता बावला,

अहमदाबाद-382220

फैब:रके:टड पी वी सी

8फ9टगस फार पोटेबल

वाटर स लाईस

10124

2

-

2009

18

7200021684

25/08/2015

Eी राधे िबवरेिजस

353/74, िवजय

इंडि6यल एसटेट

िभ>ुक गृह के पीछे,

ओढव, अहमदाबाद-

382415

पैकेजबंद

पेयजल (अदर दैन

पैकेजड नेचुरल िमनरल

वाटर)

14543

-

-

2004

19

7200021987

27/08/2015

नवदीप Q वैलस&

6/450-1,

कािचयावाड ना

नाका,अहमदाबाद

वाडी बाजार, खेडा-

387001

 वण& तथा  वण& धातु*

के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी

शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन

1417

-

-

1999

20

7200022080

27/08/2015

पारीख Q वैलस&

8/डी एच/1565/

66/67, अमदावाडी

बाजार, निडयाय,

खेडा- 387001

 वण& तथा  वण& धातु*

के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी

शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन

1417

-

-

1999

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938

2329

21

7200022181

31/08/2015

एन आर अ वाल

इंड 6ीज िलिमटेड

यूिनट-II,  लाट

नंबर.1, फ ट फेस, जी

आई डी सी, वलसाद,

वापी -396195

राइ9टग तथा Cप9टग

पेपर

1848

-

-

2007

22

7200022383

31/08/2015

सुरभी Q वैलस&

14 वैभव काJ पलै स,

गायIी मं8दर रोड

डीसा -385535

 वण& तथा  वण& धातु*

के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी

शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन

1417

-

-

1999

23

7200021886

31/08/2015

आर वी ए वा

एस आर नंबर 115,

एट: कनकपुरा

देवपुरा, ता िवजापुर,

मेहसाना, िवजापुर-

382870

पैकेजबंद

पेयजल (अदर दैन

पैकेजड नेचुरल िमनरल

वाटर)

14543

-

-

2004

[la- lh,eMh@13%11]

डॉ- एस- एल- पालकर] ] ] ] वैvािनक ^एफ* एवं ;मुख

New Delhi, the 24th May, 2016

S.O. 1039.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (5) of the regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards

(Certification) Regulations 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars of

which are given in the following schedule:

SCHEDULE

Sl.

No.

Licences

No.

Grant Date

Name & Address of the party

Title of the

Standard

IS

No.

Part

Sec

Year

1

7200020076

03/08/2015

MAGNUM AGRI EQUIPMENT PVT

LTD

SURVEY NO.16P2/P1/P1, VILLAGE:

MALGADH

TALUKA:DEESA,BANASKANTHA-

385535

Irrigation

equipment -

polyethylene pipes

for

irrigation laterals

12786

-

-

1989

2

7200020379

06/08/2015

AAI SHREE KHODIYAR

JEWELLERS

4, SAHUOG APARTMENT, NEW

SAMA ROAD,

NEAR ABHUSHAN ,

CHOKDI,VADODARA

Gold and gold

alloys,

jewellery/artefacts -

fineness and

marking -

1417

-

-

1999

3

7200020177

07/08/2015

GUJARAT CRAFT INDUSTRIES

LIMITED

431,SANTEJ- VADSAR

ROAD,SANTEJ,

GANDHINAGAR, TAL: KALOL-

382721

Textiles — high

density

polyethylene (hdpe)

/ polypropylene

(pp) woven sacks

14887

-

-

2014

2330

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

4

7200020278

07/08/2015

JANKI PUMPS

2, 7, KUMAR INDUSTRIAL

ESTATE, NEAR SHAYONA

ESTATE, B/S KRISHNA

COMPLEX, NARODA

ROAD.AHMEDABAD 380025

Openwell

submersible

pumpsets -

14220

-

-

1994

5

7200020480

10/08/2015

SAIKAMAL PACKAGED

DRINKING WATER, NAVA ROAD

KHERGAM,TAL CHIKHLI

Navsari 396040

Packaged drinking

water (other than

packaged

natural mineral

water)

14543

-

-

2004

6

7200020581

11/08/2015

AIRA EURO AUTOMATION PVT

LTD

PLOT NO.123,124, AIRA ESTATE

BEHIND SECURITY ESTATE

NEAR KASHIRAM TEXTILE MILL

NAROL ROAD AHMEDABAD

382405

Explosive

atmospheres part 11

equipment

protection by

intrinsic safety "i"

60079

1

-

2006

7

7200020783

11/08/2015

INTERGOLD GEMS PVT LTD

ORRA-SHAKTI NIWAS

SWASTIK CROSS ROAD, C G

ROAD,

NAVRANGPURA, Ahmedabad

380009

Gold and gold

alloys,

jewellery/artefacts -

fineness and

marking -

1417

-

-

1999

8

7200020884

11/08/2015

INTERGOLD GEMS PVT LTD

LG-B, G-B, WEST FIELD MALL,

OPP SURYAKIRAN COMPLEX

GHOD DOD ROAD, SURAT 395001

Gold and gold

alloys,

jewellery/artefacts -

fineness and

marking -

1417

-

-

1999

9

7200021078

11/08/2015

PAARI AGRO & ALLIED

INDUSTRIES

172, GIDC ESTATE, NARODA

AHMEDABAD 382330

Steel for general

structural purposes -

2062

-

-

2011

10

7200020682

12/08/2015

SANGIR PLASTIC PRIVATE

LIMITED

SURVEY 146/P2, NEAR RAYMOND

LTD,

VILLAGE: MOTIWADA,VALSAD

TAL: PARDI 396125

Polyethylene pipes

for the supply of

gaseous

fuels -

14885

-

-

2001

11

7200021280

17/08/2015

PRAKRITI STEELS PVT LTD

SURVEY NO.823, RAJODA,

NEAR AHMEDABAD-RAJKOT

HIGHWAY

TALUKA: BAVLA, AHMEDABAD

382220

Unplasticized pvc

pipes for potable

water

supplies -

4985

-

-

2000

12

7200021381

19/08/2015

POWER WORLD ELECTRONICS

96, MAHALAXMI ESTATE

OPP.BHAGYODAYA

Mini domestic

water heater for use

with lpg-

15558

-

-

2005

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938

2331

HOTEL SARKHEJ-SANAND ROAD

SARKHEJ AHMEDABAD 382210

13

7200021179

19/08/2015

NETAFIM IRRIGATION

INDIA PVT LTD

268-270 & 271-B,G.I.D.C.

MANJUSAR SAVLI. VADODARA

391775

Fertilizer and

chemical injector

system

14483

1

-

1997

14

7200020985

19/08/2015

KRISHA AQUA

PLOT NO.8, ANANDVADI,

BEHIND ROBY COMPLEX,

SANTADEVI ROAD,NAVSARI

NAVSARI 396445

Packaged drinking

water (other than

packaged

natural mineral

water)

14543

-

-

2004

15

7200021785

19/08/2015

RADHIKA JEWELLERS

A-13, MARUTI

COMPLEX, S J ROAD,

SIDHPUR, DIST-PATAN PATAN

384151

Gold and gold

alloys,

jewellery/artefacts -

fineness and

marking -

1417

-

-

1999

16

7200021482

24/08/2015

PRAKRITI STEELS PVT LTD

SURVEY NO.823, RAJODA,

NEAR AHMEDABAD-RAJKOT

HIGHWAY

TALUKA: BAVL, AHMEDABAD

382220

Solvent cement for

use with

unplasticized

polyvinylchloride

plastic pipe and

fittings

14182

-

-

1994

17

7200021583

24/08/2015

PRAKRITI STEELS PVT LTD

SURVEY NO.823, RAJODA,

NEAR AHMEDABAD-RAJKOT

HIGHWAY

TALUKA: BAVL, AHMEDABAD

382220

Fabricated pvc

fittings for potable

water

supplies

10124

2

-

2009

18

7200021684

25/08/2015

SHREE RADHE BEVERAGES

353/74, VIJAY IND ESTATE

BEIND BIKSHUK GRUH

ODHAV, AHMEDABAD 382415

Packaged drinking

water (other than

packaged

natural mineral

water)

14543

-

-

2004

19

7200021987

27/08/2015

NAVDEEP JEWELLERS

6/450-1, KACHIYAVAD NA NAKA

AMDAVADI BAZAR

KHEDA 387001

Gold and gold

alloys,

jewellery/artefacts -

fineness and

marking -

1417

-

-

1999

20

7200022080

27/08/2015

PARIKH JEWELS

8/DH/1565/66/67,

AMDAVADI BAZAR,

NADIAD, KHEDA 387001

Gold and gold

alloys,

jewellery/artefacts -

fineness and

marking -

1417

-

-

1999

2332

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

21

7200022181

31/08/2015

N R AGARWAL INDUSTRIES LTD

UNIT-II, PLOT NO.1, 1ST PHASE,

GIDC

VALSAD

VAPI 396195

Writing and

printing paper

CHD

1848

-

-

2007

22

7200022383

31/08/2015

SURBHI JEWELLERS

14 VAIBHAV COMPLEX

GAYATRI MANDIR ROAD

DEESA-385535

Gold and gold

alloys,

jewellery/artefacts -

fineness and

marking -

1417

-

-

1999

23

7200021886

31/08/2015

R V AQUA

SR NO.115, AT: KANAKPURA

DEVPURA TAL: VIJAPUR

MEHSANA, VIJAPUR 382870

Packaged drinking

water (other than

packaged

natural mineral

water)

14543

-

-

2004

[No. CMD/13:11]

Dr. S. L. PALKAR, Scientist ‘F’ & Head

ubZ fnYyh] 24 ebZ] 2016

dk-vk- 1040-—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks (izek.ku) fofu;e 1988 ds fofu;e (5) ds mifofu;e (6) ds vuqlj.k esa

Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks ,rn~}kjk vf/klwfpr djrk gS fd fuEu fooj.k okys ykblsalksa dks muds vkxs n”kkZ;h xbZ rkjh[k ls

jn~n/LFkfxr dj fn;k x;k gS :-

vu

vu

vu

vuqlwph

lwph

lwph

lwph

dze

la[;k

Ykkblsal la[;k

lh,e/,y-

Ykkblsal/kkjh dk uke o Ikrk

Ykkblsal ds varxZr oLrq /izde

lEc)

Hkkjrh; ekud dk “kh"kZd

jn~n djus dh

frfFk

1

7200017794

मैसस& योको टोन कां:टन'टल िलिमटेड

सव नंबर. 785 पी, कोठ, बागोदरा,

तारापुर रोड, आरनेज के पास,

अहमदाबाद

साइ8कल रबर टयूबस

आई एस 2415:2004

20.08.2015

2

7200016994

मैसस& गुजरात रा8फया इंड 6ीज

िलिमटेड,

455, वडसर रोड, ग<व सांतेज, ता

कलोल,

गांधीनगर 382721

टै सटाईस- हाई डैिसटी पालीथलीन

(एच डी पी ई) पालीपरोपलीन

वोवन

आई एस 14887:2014

26.08.2015

[la- lh,eMh@13%13]

डॉ- एस- एल- पालकर] ] ] ] वैvािनक ^एफ* एवं ;मुख

New Delhi, the 24th May, 2016

S.O. 1040.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (6) of the regulation 5 of the Bureau of Indian Standards

(Certification) Regulations 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies that the licences particulars of which

are given below have been cancelled with effect from the date indicated against each:

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938

2333

SCHEDULE

Sl.

No.

Licences

No.

CM/L-

Name & Address of the Licensee

Article/Process with

relevant Indian Standards

covered by the licence

cancelled

Date of

Cancellation

1

7200017794

M/s YOKOSTONE CONTINENTAL LIMITED

SURVEY NO. 785P, KOTH, BAGODRA TARAPUR

ROAD, NEAR ARNEJ, VILLAGE AHMEDABAD ,

Distt : Ahmedabad

Cycle Rubber Tubes

IS 2415:2004

20.08.2015

2

7200016994

M/s GUJARAT RAFFIA INDUSTRIES LTD,

455,SANTEJ VADSAR ROAD, Vill:SANTEJ,

TALUKA KALOL,

KALOL

Distt : Gandhinagar 382721

Textiles-High density

polyethylene (hdpe)

polypropylene woven sacks

IS 14887:2014

26.08.2015

[No. CMD/13:13]

Dr. S. L. PALKAR, Scientist ‘F’ & Head

 वा

 वा

 वा

 वा य

 य

 य

 य एवं परवार क" या

एवं परवार क" या

एवं परवार क" या

एवं परवार क" याण मंालय

ण मंालय

ण मंालय

ण मंालय

( वा

( वा

( वा

( वा  य

  य

  य

  य एवं प रवार क या

एवं प रवार क या

एवं प रवार क या

एवं प रवार क याण िवभाग)

ण िवभाग)

ण िवभाग)

ण िवभाग)

नई द ली, 16 मई, 2016

dk-vk- 1041-—जबक भारतीय आयुिव.ान प1रषद (संशोधन) अ> यादेश, 2013 क धारा 3क क उप-धारा (1)

Qारा द[ शिRय का योग करते Sए दनांक 6 नवम् बर, 2013 को भारतीय आयु\व.ान प1रषद का पुनग,ठन कया गया था;

और, जबक क% सरकार ने भारतीय आयु\व.ान प1रषद अिधिनयम, 1956 (1956 का 102) क धारा 3 क उप-

धारा (1) के खंड (ग) के अनुसरण म% पंजीकृत िचकB सा 4 नातक िनवा,चन :े( म% चुनाव करवाए हV तथा िन) न को इस

अिधसूचना के जारी होने क तारीख से 4 वष, के िलए भारतीय आयुिव.ान प1रषद के सद4 य के 5प म% िनवा,िचत कया गया

है।

अब, इसिलए, उG त अिधिनयम क धारा 3 क उप-धारा (1) के ावधान के अनुसरण म% क% सरकार एतद् Qारा

दनांक 9 जनवरी, 1960 को 4 वा4 _ य मं(ालय के ताB कािलक सा.आ. 138 म% भारत सरकार क अिधसूचना म% िन) न

संशोधन करती है, नामत: :-

भारत सरकार क अिधसूचना म% 4 वा4 _ य एवं प1रवार क याण मं(ालय के दनांक 6 नवंबर, 2013 के सा.आ. सं.

3324 (अ.) म%, अंितम िविa तथा इससे संबंिधत िविa के बाद िन) निलिखत को शािमल कया जाए, नामत:-

b.सं.

पंज़ीकृत िचकB सा 4 नातक

िनवा,चन :े( का नाम

िनवा,िचत सद4 य का िववरण

चुनाव का मा> यम

17.

मिणपुर

डा. िसनम राज% dसह, एम.सीएच (यूरोलॉजी),

एमएस, एमबीबीएस, ‘‘राजिनी’’ संगई,

dचगमेइरग पूव, इ) फाल मिणपुर- 795001

िनवा,िचत

[सं. वी.-11013/04/2015-एमईपी (भाग)]

अिमत िब4वास, अवर सिचव

2334

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

पाद ट& प

पाद ट& प

पाद ट& प

पाद ट& पणी:

णी:

णी:

णी:-

मूल अिधसूचना को दनांक 9 जनवरी, 1960 के सा.आ. सं. 138 के तहत भारत के राजप( म% कािशत

कया गया था त था इसम% अंितम संशोधन भारतीय आयु\व.ान प1रषद (संशोधन) िव[ीय अ> यादेश,

2013 (2013 का 11) Qारा कया गया था।

MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE

(Department of Health and Family Welfare)

New Delhi, the 16th May, 2016

S.O. 1041.— Whereas on 06th November, 2013, the Medical Council of India was re-constituted in exercise of

the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3A of the Indian Medical Council (Amendment) Ordinance, 2013;

And, whereas the Central Government, in pursuance of Clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Indian

Medical Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956) has conducted the election from the Registered Medical Graduate

Constituency and the following has been elected to be a member of the Medical Council of India for four years with

effect from the date of issue of this notification.

Now, therefore, in pursuance of the provision of sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby makes the following amendment in the Notification of the Government of India in the then Ministry

of Health number S.O. 138 dated 9th January, 1960, namely:-

In the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Health & Family Welfare number

S.O. 3324(E) dated 06th November, 2013, after the last entry and entry relating thereto, the following shall be inserted,

namely:

S. No.

Name of the Registered Medical

Graduate Constituency

Details of the Elected Member

Mode of Election

17.

Manipur

Dr. Sinam Rajendra Singh, M.Ch

(Urology), MS, MBBS, “Rajprinee”

Sangai, Chingmeirong East, Imphal

Manipur-795001

Elected

[No.V.-11013/04/2015-MEP(Pt.)]

AMIT BISWAS, Under Secy.

Foot Note :

The principal notification was published in the Gazette of India vide number S.O. 138 dated the 9th

January, 1960 and was last amended vide Indian Medical Council (Amendment) Second Ordinance,

2013 (11 of 2013).

मानव संसाधन िवकास मंालय

मानव संसाधन िवकास मंालय

मानव संसाधन िवकास मंालय

मानव संसाधन िवकास मंालय

(उ च

उ च

उ च

उ चतर िश ा िवभाग

तर िश ा िवभाग

तर िश ा िवभाग

तर िश ा िवभाग)

(राजभाषा यूिनट

राजभाषा यूिनट

राजभाषा यूिनट

राजभाषा यूिनट)

नई द ली, 19 मई, 2016

dk-vk- 1042-—के ीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासकय योजन के िलए योग) िनयम, 1976 के िनयम 10

के उप-िनयम 4 के अनुसरण म%, मानव संसाधन िवकास मं(ालय (4 कूल िश:ा एवं सा:रता िवभाग) के अंतग,त िन) निलिखत

काया,लय को, ऐसे काया,लय के 5प म%, िजसके 80 ितशत से अिधक कम,चारी-वृ द ने िह दी का काय,साधक .ान ाg त कर

िलया है, अिधसूिचत करती है :-

1.

क% ीय िवhालय, बालीगंज,

बालीगंज मैदान कV प,

कोलकाता- 700019 (पिiम बंगाल)

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938

2335

2.

क% ीय िवhालय, मालदा,

पो4 ट– मिलहा, िजला– मालदा- 732102 (पिiम बंगाल)

3.

क% ीय िवhालय के.1र.पु.बल,

िजला– बj,मान, दुगा,पुर- 713214 (पिiम बंगाल)

4.

क% ीय िवhालय, बैरकपुर (वायुसेना 4 टेशन),

पो4 ट-बंगाल इनामेल, िजला-24 परगना (उB तर) -743122

(पिiम बंगाल)

5.

क% ीय िवhालय, बीरभूम जोलबारी कॉ) पलेG स,

िनकट नगरपािलका काया,लय, िसउड़ी बीरभूम - 731101

(पिiम बंगाल)

6.

क% ीय िवhालय, सालबनी,

पो4 ट – 1रबैनोमूिल,

िजला - मेदनीपुर (पिiम) 721132 (पिiम बंगाल)

7.

क% ीय िवhालय,

फोट,िविलयम, कोलकाता- 700021

[सं.11011-2/2015-रा.भा.ए.]

सुखबीर dसह संधु, संयुG त सिचव

MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT

(Department of Higher Education)

(O.L. UNIT)

New Delhi, the 19th May, 2016

S.O. 1042.—In pursuance of sub-rule (4) of rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for Official Purposes of

the Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government hereby notifies the following offices under the Ministry of Human

Resource Development, (Department of School Education & Literacy) as office, whose more than 80% members of the

staff have acquired working knowledge of Hindi.

1.

Kendriya Vidyalaya, Ballygunge,

Ballygunge Maidan Camp, Kolkata-700019 (West Bengal)

2.

Kendriya Vidyalaya, Malda, PO- Maliha,

Distt- Malda- 732102 (West Bengal)

3.

Kendriya Vidyalaya CRPF,

Dist- Burdwan, Durgapur-713214 (West Bengal)

4.

Kendriya Vidyalaya Barrackpore (AFS),

P.O. Bengal Enamel,

Dist- 24 Parganas (N) 743122 (West Bengal)

5.

Kendriya Vidyalaya, Birbhum Golbari Complex,

Near Municipality Office, Suri Birbhum - 731101

(West Bengal)

6.

Kendriya Vidyalaya Salboni, P.O.- RBNM

Dist – Medinipore (west) 721132, (West Bengal)

7.

Kendriya Vidyalaya, Fort William

Kolkata- 700021

[No. 11011-2/2015-O.L.U.]

SUKHBIR SINGH SANDHU, Jt. Secy.

2336

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

oL=k ea=kky;

ubZ fnYyh] 20 ebZ] 2016

dk-vk- 1043-—dsUnzh; ljdkj] (la?k ds 'kkldh; iz;kstuksa ds fy, iz;ksx) jktHkk"kk fu;e] 1976 ds fu;e 10 ds

mi&fu;e (4) ds vuqlj.k esa] oL=k ea=kky; ds varxZr vkus okys fuEufyf[kr dk;kZy;ksa dks ftlds 80% ls vf/d deZpkfj;ksa us fganh

dk dk;Zlk/d Kku izkIr dj fy;k gS] vfèklwfpr djrh gS %

1-

{ks=kh; dk;kZy;] dsaæh; js'ke cksMZ] 5oka ry] fodkl nhi] y[kuÅ&226001 (m-iz-)

2-

fiQUys feYl] us'kuy VsDlVkbYl dkiksZjs'ku fy-] vejkorh jksM] vpuiqj] ftyk vejkorh] fiu dksM 444805

(egkjk”Vª)

3-

jktuxj VsDlVkby feYl] us'kuy VsDlVkbYl dkiksZjs'ku fy-] mÙkj xqtjkr iVsy uxj lksLkkbVh ds lkeus] ckcqiqjk]

gfjiqjk] vlkjok] vgenkckn&380016 (xqtjkr)

¹la- bZ-&11016@01@2015&¯gnhº

xhrk ukjk;.k] la;qDr lfpo

MINISTRY OF TEXTILES

New Delhi, the 20th May, 2016

S.O. 1043.—In pursuance of sub-rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for the Official Purpose of

the Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government, hereby notify the following offices of the Ministry of Textiles, more

than 80% staff whereof have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi :

1.

Regional Office, Central Silk Board, 5th Floor, Vikas Deep, 22 Station Road, Lucknow-226001

(Uttar Pradesh)

2.

Finlay Mills, National Textiles Corporation Ltd., Amravati Road, Achalpur, District-Amravati,

Pin 444805 (Maharashtra)

3.

Rajnagar Textile Mills, National Textiles Corporation Ltd., Opp. Uttar Gujarat Patelnagar Society,

Babupura, Haripura, Asarwa, Ahmedabad-380016 (Gujarat).

[No. E.-11016/01/2015-Hindi]

GEETA NARAYAN, Jt. Secy.

;qok dk;ZØe vkSj [ksy ea=kky;

ubZ fnYyh] 18 ebZ] 2016

dk-vk- 1044-—dsUnzh; ljdkj] ,rn~}kjk jktHkk"kk (la?k ds 'kkldh; iz;kstuksa ds fy, iz;ksx) fu;e] 1976 ds fu;e 10 ds

mi&fu;e (4) ds vuqlj.k esa] ;qok dk;ZØe vkSj [ksy ea=kky; ds Lok;Ùk'kklh dk;kZy; Hkkjrh; [ksy izkf/dj.k] jktho xka/h mPp

f'k[kj izf'k{k.k dsaæ] f'kyk# (fg-iz)] ftlds 80% ls vf/d deZpkjh&oU`n us fganh dk dk;Zlk/d Kku izkIr dj fy;k gS] dks

vfèklwfpr djrh gS A

¹fe- la-&11011@02@2008&fg-,-º

,l- ,y- ehuk] mi lfpo

MINISTRY OF YOUTH AFFAIRS AND SPORTS

New Delhi, the 18th May, 2016

S.O. 1044.—In pursuance of sub-rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for the Official Purposes

of the Union) Rule, 1976, the Central Government, hereby notify Sports Authority of India, Rajiv Gandhi High Altitute

Training Centre, Shilaru (H.P.), an Autonomous office of Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports, whereof more than 80%

staff have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi.

[F. No. E-11011/02/2008-H.U.]

S. L. MEENA, Dy. Secy.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938

2337

ubZ fnYyh] 18 ebZ] 2016

dk-vk- 1045-—dsUnzh; ljdkj] ,rn~}kjk jktHkk"kk (la?k ds 'kkldh; iz;kstuksa ds fy, iz;ksx) fu;e] 1976 ds fu;e 10 ds

mi&fu;e (4) ds vuqlj.k esa] ;qok dk;ZØe vkSj [ksy ea=kky; ds v/huLFk dk;kZy; jk"Vªh; lsok ;kstuk {ks=kh; funs'kky;] fnYyh

ftlds 80% ls vf/d deZpkjhoa`n us fganh dk dk;Zlk/d Kku izkIr dj fy;k gS] dks vfèklwfpr djrh gS A

¹fe- la- 11011@02@2008&fg-,-º

,l- ,y- ehuk] mi lfpo

New Delhi, the 18th May, 2016

S.O. 1045.—In pursuance of sub-rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for the Official Purposes

of the Union) Rule, 1976, the Central Government, hereby notify National Service Scheme Regional Directorate, Delhi,

a Subordinate office of Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports, whereof more than 80% staff have acquired the working

knowledge of Hindi.

[F. No. E-11011/02/2008-H.U.]

S. L. MEENA, Dy. Secy.

ubZ fnYyh] 18 ebZ] 2016

dk-vk- 1046-—dsUnzh; ljdkj] ,rn~}kjk jktHkk"kk (la?k ds 'kkldh; iz;kstuksa ds fy, iz;ksx) fu;e] 1976 ds fu;e 10 ds

mi&fu;e (4) ds vuqlj.k esa] ;qok dk;ZØe vkSj [ksy ea=kky; ds v/huLFk dk;kZy; jk"Vªh; lsok ;kstuk {ks=kh; funs'kky;] paMhx<+

ftlds 80% ls vf/d deZpkjhoa`n us fganh dk dk;Zlk/d Kku izkIr dj fy;k gS] dks vfèklwfpr djrh gS A

¹fe- la- 11011@02@2008&fg-,-º

,l- ,y- ehuk] mi lfpo

New Delhi, the 18th May, 2016

S.O. 1046.—In pursuance of sub-rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for the Official Purposes

of the Union) Rule, 1976, the Central Government, hereby notify National Service Scheme Regional Directorate,

Chandigarh, a Subordinate office of Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports, whereof more than 80% staff have acquired

the working knowledge of Hindi.

[F. No. E-11011/02/2008-H.U.]

S. L. MEENA, Dy. Secy.

ubZ fnYyh] 18 ebZ] 2016

dk-vk- 1047-—dsUnzh; ljdkj] ,rn~}kjk jktHkk"kk (la?k ds 'kkldh; iz;kstuksa ds fy, iz;ksx) fu;e] 1976 ds fu;e 10 ds

mi&fu;e (4) ds vuqlj.k esa] ;qok dk;ZØe vkSj [ksy ea=kky; ds v/huLFk dk;kZy; jk"Vªh; lsok ;kstuk {ks=kh; funs'kky;]

fr#ouUriqje ftlds 80% ls vf/d deZpkjhoa`n us fganh dk dk;Zlk/d Kku izkIr dj fy;k gS] dks vfèklwfpr djrh gS A

¹fe- la- 11011@02@2008&fg-,-º

,l- ,y- ehuk] mi lfpo

New Delhi, the 18th May, 2016

S.O. 1047.—In pursuance of sub-rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for the Official Purposes

of the Union) Rule, 1976, the Central Government, hereby notify National Service Scheme Regional Directorate,

Thiruvananthapuram, a Subordinate office of Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports, whereof more than 80% staff have

acquired the working knowledge of Hindi.

[F. No. E-11011/02/2008-H.U.]

S. L. MEENA, Dy. Secy.

ubZ fnYyh] 25 ebZ] 2016

dk-vk- 1048-—dsUnzh; ljdkj] ,rn~}kjk jktHkk"kk (la?k ds 'kkldh; iz;kstuksa ds fy, iz;ksx) fu;e] 1976 ds fu;e 10 ds

mi&fu;e (4) ds vuqlj.k esa] ;qok dk;ZØe vkSj [ksy ea=kky; ds Lok;Ùk'kklh dk;kZy;] usg: ;qok dsaæ] dsykax (ykgkSy Lihfr)] (fg-

iz-)] ftlds 80% ls vf/d deZpkjh&oU`n us fganh dk dk;Zlk/d Kku izkIr dj fy;k gS] dks vfèklwfpr djrh gS A

¹fe- la- 11011@02@2008&fg-,-º

,l- ,y- ehuk] mi lfpo

2338

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 25th May, 2016

S.O. 1048.—In pursuance of sub-rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for the Official Purposes

of the Union) Rule, 1976, the Central Government, hereby notify Nehru Yuva Kendra, Keylong, (Lahul Spiti) (H.P.), an

Autonomous office of Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports, whereof more than 80% staff have acquired the working

knowledge of Hindi.

[F. No. E-11011/02/2008-H.U.]

S. L. MEENA, Dy. Secy.

lapkj vkSj lwpuk izkS|ksfxdh ea=kky;

(bysDVªkWfudh vkSj lwpuk izkS|ksfxdh foHkkx)

ubZ fnYyh] 23 ebZ] 2016

dk-vk- 1049-—dsUnzh; ljdkj] ,rn~}kjk jktHkk"kk (la?k ds 'kkldh; iz;kstuksa ds fy, iz;ksx) fu;e] 1976 ds fu;e 10 ds

mi&fu;e (4) ds vuqlj.k esa] bysDVªkWfudh vkSj lwpuk izkS|ksfxdh foHkkx ds lac¼ dk;kZy; ekudhdj.k ijh{k.k rFkk xq.koÙkk izek.ku

funs'kky; ds xqokgkVh fLFkr v/huLFk dk;kZy;] bysDVªkWfudh ijh{k.k rFkk fodkl dsaæ] ftlds 80% ls vf/d deZpkfj;ksa us fganh dk

dk;Zlk/d Kku izkIr dj fy;k gS] dks vfèklwfpr djrh gS A

¹la- 7(2)@2005&fg-v-º

jktho dqekj] la;qDr lfpo

MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

(Department of Electronics and Information Technology)

New Delhi, the 23rd May, 2016

S.O. 1049.—In pursuance of sub-rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for the Official Purpose of

the Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government, hereby notifies the Electronics Test and Development Centre, a

subordinate office of the Standardisation Testing and Quality Certification Directorate, and attached office of the

Department of Electronics and Information Technology, located at Guwahati, whose more than 80% staff have acquired

the working knowledge of Hindi.

[No. 7(2)/2005-H.S.]

RAJIV KUMAR, Jt. Secy.

कोयला मंालय

कोयला मंालय

कोयला मंालय

कोयला मंालय

नई द ली, 25 मई, 2016

का

का

का

का.आ. 1050

. 1050

. 1050

. 1050.—के ीय सरकार, कोयला धारक :े( (अज,न और िवकास) अिधिनयम 1957 (1957 का 20)

(िजसे इसम% इसके पL चात् उG त अिधिनयम कहा गया है) क धारा 9 क उप-धारा (1) के अधीन जारी भारत के राजप(,

असाधारण, भाग ।।, खंड 3, उपखंड (ii), तारीख 8 फरवरी,2016 म% कािशत भारत सरकार के कोयला मं(ालय क

अिधसूचना Qारा का. आ. सं2 यांक 397(अ), तारीख 8 फरवरी, 2016 के काशन पर, उG त अिधसूचना से उपाबj

अनुसूची म% व\णत भूिम (िजसे इसम% इसके पL चात् उG त भूिम कहा गया है) और भूिम म% या उस पर के सभी अिधकार, उG त

अिधिनयम क धारा 10 क उप-धारा (1) के अधीन, सभी िव लंगम से मुG त होकर, आB यंितक 5प म% के ीय सरकार म%

िनिहत हो गए थे;

और, के ीय सरकार का यह समाधान हो गया है, क स%lल कोलफ mस िलिमटेड, रांची, (िजसे इसम% इसके

पL चात् सरकारी कंपनी कहा गया है), ऐसे िनबंधन और शतn का िज ह% के ीय सरकार इस िनिमB त अिधरोिपत करना

उिचत समझे, अनुपालन करने के िलये रजामंद हV ;

अत: अब, के ीय सरकार, कोयला धारक :े( (अज,न और िवकास) अिधिनयम 1957 क धारा 11 क उपधारा

(1) Qारा दB त शिG तय का योग करते Sए, यह िनदoश देती है, क उG त भूिम म% या उस पर के सभी अिधकार के ीय

सरकार म% इस कार िनिहत बने रहने के बजाए, 8 फरवरी, 2016 से िन) निलिखत िनबंधन और शतn के अधीन रहते Sए,

उG त सरकारी कंपनी म% िनिहत हो जाएंगे, अथा,त् -

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938

2339

1.

सरकारी कंपनी, उG त अिधिनयम के उपबंध के अधीन यथा अवधा1रत ितकर, p याज, नुकसािनय और वैसी ही

मद क बाबत् कए गए संदाय क के ीय सरकार को ितपू\त करेगी ;

2.

सरकारी क) पनी Qारा शत, (1) के अधीन के ीय सरकार को संदेय रकम का अवधारण करने के योजन के िलए

उG त अिधिनयम क धारा 14 के अधीन एक अिधकरण का गठन कया जाएगा और ऐसे कसी अिधकरण और

अिधकरण क सहायता के िलए िनयुG त q यिG तय के संबंध म% उपगत सभी q यय, सरकारी कंपनी Qारा वहन कए

जाrगे और इसी कार िनिहत उG त भूिम म% या उस पर के अिधकार के िलए या उनके संबंध म% अपील% आद सभी

िविधक काय,वािहय क बाबत् उपगत, सभी q यय भी, सरकारी कंपनी Qारा वहन कए जाएंगे ;

3.

सरकारी कंपनी, के ीय सरकार या उसके पदधा1रय क, ऐसे कसी अ य q यय के संबंध म% :ितपू\त करेगी, जो

इस कार िनिहत उG त भूिम म% या उस पर के अिधकार के बार% म%, के ीय सरकार या उसके पदधा1रय Qारा या

उनके िव5j क हH काय,वािहय के संबंध म% आवL यक हो ;

4.

सरकारी कंपनी को के ीय सरकार के पूव, अनुमोदन के िबना उG त भूिम को कसी अ य q यिG त को अंत1रत करने

क शिG त नहH होगी ; और

5.

सरकारी कंपनी, ऐसे िनदoश और शतn का पालन करेगी, जो के ीय सरकार Qारा,जब कभी आवL यक हो, उG त

भूिम के िविशs ट :े( के िलए दए जाएं या अिधरोिपत कए जाएं ।

[फा. सं. 43015/17/2014-पीआरआईडp  यू-I]

सुजीत कुमार , अवर सिचव

MINISTRY OF COAL

New Delhi, the 25th May, 2016

S.O. 1050.—Whereas on the publication of the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Coal,

number S.O. 397 (E), dated the 8th February, 2016, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3,

Sub-section (ii), dated the 8th February, 2016, issued under sub-section (1) of section 9 of the Coal Bearing Areas

(Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 (20 of 1957) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), the land and all rights in

or over the land described in the Schedule appended to the said notification (hereinafter referred to as the said land) are

vested absolutely in the Central Government free from all encumbrances under sub-section (1) of section 10 of the said

Act;

And whereas, the Central Government is satisfied that the Central Coalfields Limited, Ranchi (hereinafter

referred to as the Government Company) is willing to comply with such terms and conditions as the Central Government

thinks fit to impose in this behalf;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 11 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby directs that all rights in or over the said land so vested, shall, with effect from the 8th February,

2016, instead of continuing to so vest in the Central Government shall vest in the Government company, subject to the

following terms and conditions, namely:-

1. The Government Company shall reimburse to the Central Government all payments made in respect of

compensation, interest, damages, and the like, as determined under the provisions of the said Act;

2. A Tribunal shall be constituted under section 14 of the said Act, for the purpose of determining the amounts

payable to the Central Government by the said Government Company under condition (1) and all expenditure

incurred in connection with any such tribunal and persons appointed to assist the Tribunal shall be borne by the

said Government Company and similarly, all expenditure incurred in respect of all legal proceedings like

appeals, etc. for or in connection with the rights, in or over the said land, so vested, shall also be borne by the

Government Company;

3. The Government Company shall indemnify the Central Government or its officials against any other

expenditure that may be necessary in connection with any proceedings by or against the Central Government or

its officials regarding the aforesaid rights in or over the said land so vested;

4. The Government Company shall have no power to transfer the aforesaid rights in the said lands so vested, to

any other person without the prior approval of the Central Government; and

5. The Government Company shall abide by such directions and conditions as may be given or imposed by the

Central Government for particular areas of the said land as and when necessary.

[F. No. 43015/17/2014- PRIW-I]

SUJEET KUMAR, Under Secy.

2340

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Je ,oa jkstxkj ea=kky;

ubZ fnYyh] 2 ebZ] 2016

dk-vk- 1051-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj v'kksd

gksVy] ubZ fnYyh ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkj ds chp vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;&1] fnYyh ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 68@2012) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 28-04-

2016 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&42025@03@2016&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)]

Ikh- ds- os.kqxksiky] MsLd vf/dkjh

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

New Delhi, the 2nd May, 2016

S.O. 1051.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (I.D No. 68/2012) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-Cum-

Labour-Court No.-1, Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to

the management of the Ashok Hotel, New Delhi and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on

28.04.2016.

[No. L-42025/03/2016-IR (DU)]

P. K. VENUGOPAL, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

IN THE COURT OF SHRI AVTAR CHAND DOGRA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT NO.1, KARKARDOOMA COURT COMPLEX, DELHI

ID No. 68/2012

Shri Arjun Singh, through

The President

Ashok Hotel Mazdoor Janta Union,

Ashok Hotel Staff Quarter No.C-48-49,

50-B, Chanakyapuri,

New Delhi – 110 021

…Workman

Versus

The General Manager,

Ashok Hotel, 50-B,

Chanakyapuri,

Delhi 110 021

…Management

AWARD

Brief facts giving rise to the present case are that the workman herein directly raised a dispute before this

Tribunal under provisions of sub-section (2) of Section 2A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (in short the Act)

inasmuch as period of 45 days stood expired from the date of making his application before the Conciliation Officer and

no reference is required under the Act by the Tribunal from the appropriate Government after the said period.

2.

It is averred in the statement of claim that the workman herein, Shri Arjun Singh, was working in Ashok Hotel

since October 2006 to the satisfaction of the management of Ashok Hotel. There was no complaint against the said

workman and their group leader has also appreciated his services. The workman herein was working in the premises of

Ashok Hotel against permanent post lying vacant in Ashok Hotel. Officials of Ashok Hotel used to assign the job or

work to the workman herein and also used to mark his attendance and supervision of the work/job was under the control

of management of Ashok Hotel.

3.

It is further the case of the workman herein that he has filed proper applications and was also interviewed by the

officials of Ashok Hotel before his appointment. However, instead of giving direct letter of appointment through

management of Ashok Hotel, he was issued letter through the contractor, M/s. Recruitment Bureau so as to deprive him

of proper pay-scales as well as other benefits applicable to the post of cashier. Workman herein was working in the

restaurants of Ashok Hotel, dealing with cash. However, he was not paid cash handling allowance of Rs.200.00 per

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938

2341

month, which he was entitled as per rules. It is pertinent to mention here that the workman was working with the

permanent cashiers appointed by the management of Ashok Hotel , who were being paid regular pay scale of cashier,

alongwith other allowances whereas the workman herein was paid less salary starting from Rs.7000.00 per month

whereas permanent employees working as cashiers are getting salary of Rs.30,000.00 per month. Job carried out by the

workman herein was perennial in nature and the same should have not been done through contractor, as such, contrary

to the provisions of Contract Labour Act, 1970. For the purpose of making payment of salary, management of Ashok

Hotel was using services of middleman contractor M/s. Recruitment Bureau, who was making payment to the workman

after receiving the said salary from the management of Ashok Hotel every month. It is further alleged that as per

Payment of Wages Act, 1948 workman is entitled to double the wages for extra duty performed by them, which was also

denied to the workman herein. EPF of the workman herein as per rule of Ashok Hotel should have been deposited in

Ashok Hotel Employees Provident Fund Trust No.DL-522, which was not done. Regional Provident Fund

Commissioner (North Delhi) cancelled the Ashok Hotel Employees PF Trust No.DL-522 on account of non-deposit of

PF money of the employees in the EPF Trust of Ashok Hotel, who were working through contractor, vide letter dated

28.12.2010, which was subsequently restored vide order dated 14.07.2011. Workman herein was also entitled for bonus

as per Bonus Act, 1965 for the financial years working since 2004 but the management of Ashok Hotel paid only

Rs.3000.00 once in the entire service of the workmen. Workman has completed 240 days in each calendar year and thus

was entitled for regularization of his services with the management of Ashok Hotel. However, instead of regularizing

services of the workman, his services were illegally terminated in September 2011. While removing the workman from

service no notice or pay in lieu thereof, nor any service compensation for the service rendered by the workmen was

given to him; as such, it violates provisions of Section 25F of the Act.

4.

There are also averments that as per Standing Orders of Ashok Hotel under Section No. 3 there is a

classification of the employees, i.e. Permanent, Temporary, Badlis, casuals, probationers and apprentices and the

management of Ashok Hotel cannot use services of employees through contractor and have to employ or appoint

employees in the above categories. Workmen were working in the premises of Ashok Hotel , who were beneficiary of

their services. As such, they were employees of Ashok Hotel for all purposes. The workman has also written letter to

the General Manager of Ashok Hotel on 30.12.2011 requesting them to take them on duty, but Ashok Hotel has not

responded to the said letter so far. President of Ashok Hotel Mazdoor Janta Union wrote a letters 07.01.2012 but the

same was not responded by the management of Ashok Hotel. In the end, Workman has prayed that the management of

Ashok Hotel be directed to reinstate him with full back wages.

5.

Management was put to notice, who filed written statement taking preliminary objections, claiming that the

present claim is totally misconceived, ill conceived and not tenable. It is further alleged that the workman herein was an

employee of M/s. Recruitment Bureau, as such, there is no cause of action against the management of Ashok Hotel. The

answering management is neither necessary nor a proper party for adjudication of the claim and name of the answering

management should be deleted and substituted with M/s. Recruitment Bureau, which is necessary party. Answering

management has entered into an agreement with M/s. Recruitment Bureau for providing manpower for job works which

was on principal to principal basis. Workman herein was permanent employee of M/s. Recruitment Bureau. Liability

towards all the relief of the workman is that of M/s. Recruitment Bureau and the answering management has no role in

the present dispute.

6.

On merits, management has denied most of the averments contained in the statement of claim. It is specifically

denied that the workman herein was working for the management of Ashok Hotel as he was an employee of M/s.

Recruitment Bureau under whose control and supervision he was working. It is also denied that attendance of workman

was being marked in I. Card section. Answering management has no rule with regard to marking of attendance of

workmen of Recruitment Bureau, who were deployed for rendering service under the contract. Answering management,

being principal employer, has no authority to make salary slip of the employees of Recruitment Bureau. Salary bill is

raised by the service provider is required to be verified by the concerned officer of Ashok Hotel to establish their

authenticity and to ensure compliance of statutory provisions. Averments made in the other paras in relation to

deployment, payment of wages, bonus etc. has also been denied by the management. Finally, it has been prayed that this

Tribunal may dismiss the claim filed by the workman herein.

7.

Against this factual background, my learned predecessor, on the basis of pleadings of the parties, vide order

dated 30.05.2012, framed the following issues:

(i)

Whether there is relationship of employer and employee between Ashok Hotel and the claimant?

(ii)

Whether the claimant is an employee of M/s. Recruitment Bureau to whom annual maintenance

contract has been given by M/s. Ashok Hotel?

(iii)

Whether the claimant rendered continuous service of more than 240 days with M/s. Ashok Hotel in

the preceding 12 months from the date of termination of his services?

2342

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(iv)

Whether termination of services of the claimant amounts to retrenchment?

(v)

Whether the claimant is entitled for reinstatement in the services of the management ?

8.

Workmen, in order to prove his case against the management examined himself as WW1 and Shri S.S.

Upadhyay as WW2, whose affidavits areEx.WW1/A and Ex.WW2/A respectively and they have also adduced several

documents in evidence and I would be discussing the same while rendering findings in the subsequent paras on various

issues.

9.

Management, in order to rebut the case of the workmen, examined Shri Lohit Joshi, Manager(HR) as MW1 and

also filed affidavit, Ex.MW1/A. He has also tendered in evidence certificate of registration under the Contract Labour

Act and copies of bills raised by Recruitment Bureau etc. and the documents are Ex.MW1/1 to Ex.MW1/8.

10.

I have heard Shri S.S. Upadhyay, authorized representative for the claimant and Shri B.K. Singh, authorized

representative for the management.

Findings on Issue No.1, 2 and 3

11.

All these issues are being taken up together for the purpose of discussion as they are inter-related and can be

conveniently disposed of.

12.

Shri Arjun Singh examined himself as WW1, whose affidavit is Ex.WW1/A. He has deposed that he was

working since October 2006 as cashier. It was the Manager who assigned duty to him as per duty roster. He used to

record time of his arrival as well as departure in the attendance register. His attendance was recorded by the Manager.

He used to work in shifts and his wages used to be paid through contractor. Photocopy of the Identity card issued to him

is Ex.WW1/7. He has not received any notice regarding details for the amount of deposits in his provident fund. He

specifically deposed that no termination letter was issued to him . There were regular employees in the Hotel who were

doing similar job of cashier. He has admitted that his wages were paid by M/s. Recruitment Bureau after getting bill

passed from the management. He further admitted that the management had not signed any documents with him relating

to his service conditions. He has denied other suggestions made by the management.

13.

It is clear from the affidavit filed by Shri S.S. Upadhyay, copy of which is Ex.WW2/A that the same is on

similar lines as the averments made in the statement of claim. During the course of arguments, it was not disputed that

Ashok Hotel Mazdoor Janta Union is recognized union by the management of Ashok Hotel and there are several cases

which have been filed by the workmen through the said union. Admittedly, Ashok Hotel is a public sector undertaking

being run by Board of Directors under the Ministry of Tourism. It has its own rules and regulations regarding working

of the Hotel. It was also not disputed that Certified Standing Orders modified from time to time are full applicable

governing services of the employees working in the said Hotel. During the course of arguments, attention of this

Tribunal was invited to Section 3 of the Sanding Order, Ex.WW2/1, which deals with the classification of the

employees, which clearly provides that all employees of the company shall be classified as under:

a)

Permanent

b)

Temporary

c)

Badlis

d)

Casuals

e)

Probationers

14.

Certified standing orders is a complete code so far as services of the employees working in Ashok Hotel is

concerned and it contains specific provisions relating to the procedure for dealing with cases of misconduct. The term

permanent, temporary, badlis, casuals and probationer workmen has also been fully defined in the said standing orders.

It is specifically averred in para 8 of affidavit Ex.WW2/A that the strength of employees approved by the Board of

Directors is 1494 in all and employees are appointed in respective categories as per strength of the category. There is

also specific mention of the vacant posts and it is specifically alleged that so far as post of cashiers/clerks were

concerned, 50 posts of cashiers/clerks were vacant in 2012 against sanctioned post of about 100. Further, management

of Ashok Hotel utilizes services of workmen through M/s. Recruitment Bureau. However, supervision and control over

the workmen was that of the management of Ashok Hotel. Admittedly, workman herein was working in the premises

of Ashok Hotel. Shri S.S. Upadhyay has admitted that on number of occasions, payment of wages was made when he

happened to be present there. Payment of wages was made through M/s. Recruitment Bureau to the workmen. He has

further admitted that the workman herein was engaged by M/s. Recruitment Bureau and his services were dispensed

with by the said Bureau. He has tendered in evidence duty chart Ex.WW2/13, which shows that the workmen used to

work in the premises of Ashok Hotel and officials of Ashok Hotel used to mark their attendance. This witness also

tendered in evidence document Ex.WW2/5 which shows that management has awarded job contract to the agency

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938

2343

mentioned in the said document. There is also letter dated 26.08.2008 Ex.WW2/6 written by Manager, Ashok Hotel to

M/s. Recruitment Bureau wherein requirement of 16 candidates has been mentioned to the needful work. There is yet

another letter Ex.WW2/7 dated 28.07.2008 which shows that deployment of Shri Satveer Nimesh as Cashier was done

by the management of Ashok Hotel. Another letter Ex.WW2/8 addressed by the General Manager to M/s. Sparkling

Enterprises shows that the management of Ashok Hotel complained to the contractor that the employees mentioned in

the said letter were found to be sleeping during surprise check carried out by officials of the management. Competent

authority has directed to take major penalty action against the delinquent employees. This again shows that so far as

working of the employees is concerned, supervision and control over them was that of the management of Ashok Hotel

and the so called contractor was engaged by the principal employee, i.e. Ashok Hotel was simply a service provider on

paper who has forwarded name of workmen for the purpose of deployment in the various units of the Hotel. Ex.WW2/9

shows that surprise check was carried out by officials of the Hotel on the night of 24/25.08.2008 and the workers whose

names are mentioned in the said list were found sleeping. Ex.WW2/12 shows list of workmen employed in Ashok

Hotel.

15.

After termination of the job of the workman herein, Shri S.S. Upadhyay, President of the Union has written

letter to the General Manager, Ashok Hotel, informing the management that cashier, namely Shri Arjun Singh who was

working under the management of Ashok Hotel since October 2006 has now been removed from service in an illegal

manner. However, there is force in the contention of the workman herein that no such notice before termination or

payment of salary in lieu of the notice was made to the workman before removal or terminating his services.

16.

Management, in order to rebut the case of the workman, examined Shri Lohit Joshi as MW1, whose affidavit is

Ex.MW1/A. He has tendered documents relating to Certificate of Registration Ex./MW1/1 and other documents

Ex.MW1/2, to Ex.MW1/8. He was posted at Ashok Hotel in October 2012. He has admitted that Certified Standing

Orders are applicable to employees of Ashok Hotel. He has admitted the various categories of the employees as

mentioned in the said Standing Orders. He further admitted creation of provident fund trust pertaining to employees of

Ashok Hotel. He admitted that as per rule 14, Ex.WW2/2, duty is cast on the principal employer to deposit contribution

of the provident fund in respect of employees of the contractor in the Trust. He has further deposed that wages were

paid to all the employees through M/s. Recruitment Bureau and said employees were working in Ashok Hotel. He has

admitted that duty chart Ex.WW1/4 bears signatures of the Bills Manager at point A. To a court question as to why

signature of Bills Manager appears at point A, witness sought further time to explain the said fact. He has admitted that

Ex.WW2/13 nowhere bears signatures of the contractor. It is clear from perusal of duty chart Ex.WW2/13 that duty chart

does not bear signature of the contractor or any of his agent. Bills Manager as signed the same at the end. Thus, there

is no force in the contention of the management that it was M/s Recruitment Bureau who was having overall control on

the working as well as supervision over the workmen herein. There is amply evidence on record, as discussed above, to

show that above contractor was simply a name lender and the workman herein was actually working under complete

control and supervision of the management of Ashok Hotel. Their placement on duty as well as nature of duty was duly

determined by the management from time to time and they were also shifted from one place to another within the

premises of Ashok Hotel by the officials of the management so as to get work from them.

17.

Now, the primary question which arises for consideration is whether the workman were in the employment of

Ashok Hotel or were employed by M/s. Recruitment Bureau. Equally important is the fact that agreement between the

management of Ashok Hotel and the contractor is genuine or simply a sham and camouflage so as to deny status of

workmen under the principal employer herein. In this regard, strong reliance was placed by Shri Upadhyay, learned

authorized representative appearing on behalf of the workman upon Steel Authority of India Ltd. and others Vs. National

Union Waterfront Workers and others (2001) 7 SCC 1, wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court considered extensively

various provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 as well as Contract Labour Act, 1970 alongwith relevant

notification issued under Section 10 of the Contract Labour Act, 1970. A critical appraisal of the above judgement

would show that the Hon’ble Apex Court has taken into consideration the entire spectrum of the case law on the subject

and held in para 107 as under:

107. An analysis of the cases, discussed above, shows that they fall in three classes: (i) where contract labour is

engaged in or in connection with the work of an establishment and employment of contract labour is prohibited

either because the industrial adjudicator/court ordered abolition of contract labour or because the appropriate

Government issued notification under Section 10(1) of the CLRA Act, no automatic absorption of the contract

labour working in the establishment was ordered; (ii) where the contract was found to be a sham and nominal,

rather a camouflage, in which case the contract labour working in the establishment of the principal employer

were held, in fact and in reality, the employees of the principal employer himself. Indeed, such cases do not

relate to abolition of contract labour but present instances wherein the Court pierced the veil and declared the

correct position as a fact at the stage after employment of contract labour stood prohibited; (iii) where in

discharge of a statutory obligation of maintaining a canteen in an establishment the principal employer availed

2344

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

the services of a contractor the courts have held that the contract labour would indeed be the employees of the

principal employer.

18.

Ratio of the above judgement has been cited with approval in all the subsequent pronouncement by the various

High Courts as well as the Hon’ble Supreme Court and while making various conclusions, ratio of he law in Hussanbhai

case (three judgements decision) was approved and ratio of the judgement in Air India Statutory Corporation Vs. United

Labour Union (1997) 9 SCC 377 was partly overruled prospectively. It was also made clear that neither Section 10 of

the Contract Labour Ac nor any other provisions under the Act, whether expressly or by necessary implication provides

for automatic absorption of the contact labour on issuance of notification by the appropriate Government under sub-

section 1 of Section 10 prohibiting employment of contract labour in any process, operation or other work in any

establishment. Mater is to be decided judiciously by the Industrial Adjudicator where a contractor has been interposed

either on the ground of having undertaken to produce any given result for the establishment or for supply of contract

labour for the work of the establishment under a genuine contract or is merely a ruse/camouflage to evade compliance

with various beneficial legislations so as to deprive the workers of the benefit there-under. If the contract is found to be

not genuine but a mere camouflage, the so called contract labour will be treated as employees of the principal employer

who shall be directed to regularize services of the contract labour in the establishment concerned, subject to the

conditions as may be specified by it for that purpose in the light of para 6 hereunder:

(6) If the contract is found to be genuine and prohibition notification under Section 10(1) of the CLRA Act in

respect of the concerned establishment has been issued by the appropriate Government, prohibiting

employment of contract labour in any process, operation or other work of any establishment and where in such

process, operation or other work of the establishment the principal employer intends to employ regular

workmen he shall give preference to the erstwhile contract labour, if otherwise found suitable and, if necessary,

by relaxing the condition as to maximum age appropriately taking into consideration the age of the workers at

the time of their initial employment by the contractor and also relaxing the condition as to academic

qualifications other than technical qualifications.

19.

This Tribunal has to keep one thing in mind that the Industrial Disputes Act as well as Contract Labour Act.

Essential and beneficial legislation of the scheme of the Contract Labour Act 1970 is to regulate conditions of workers

under the contract labour system and to provide for its abolition by the appropriate Government as provided under

Section 10 of the said Act. Section 12 of the said Act bars a contractor from undertaking or executing any work through

contract labour, except under and in accordance with a licence issued. Section 23, 24 and 25 of the Act makes

contravention of provisions of the Act punishable there-under. There is also requirement for the principal employer of

the establishment to get itself registered under the Act so as to avail the benefit of provisions of the Act.

20.

Reliance was also placed upon the case of Management of Ashok Hotel vs Their Workmen decided on

19.02.2013 in WP(C) No.14828/2006 wherein similar question was involved. It was a case where various workmen

were working continuously as safaiwala/Housemen in the kitchen department etc. and they were alleged to be working

directly under the contactor who has entered into a contract with the principal employer, i.e. Ashok Hotel. Strong

reliance was placed on behalf of the workmen upon ratio of the case in Steel Authority of India (supra) and contention of

the management to the effect that workmen were employees of the contractor was rejected. Further, contract in the said

case was also held to be sham and camouflage so as to deny direct relationship of employer (Ashok Hotel) and the

workmen.

21.

Lastly, reliance was placed upon the case of J. Elangovan vs. CGIT cum Labour Court Chennai decided on

13.12.2010 wherein workmen who were engaged as lift operators through contractor by the principal employer, i.e

Airport Authority of India, were held to be employees of the contractor by the Industrial Tribunal and an appeal against

the same was filed before the Hon’ble High Court wherein same plea was taken as in the case in hand that the workmen

were getting salary through contractor and were not engaged by the principal employer, who was not having any

effective control over them. However, this plea was rejected by the Hon’ble High Court by heavily relying upon the

ratio of the case of Hussain Bhai Calicut Vs. The Alath Factory Thezhilali Union, Kozhikode & others (1978 4 SCC

257), Catering Cleaners of Southern Railway Vs. Union of India and another (1987 1 SCC 700), Silver Jubilee Tailoring

House and others vs. Chief Inspector of Shops and Establishments and another (1974 (3) SCC 498, Mishra Chatu Nigam

Ltd. and others V.M. Venkataiah and others ( 2003 7 SCC 488), Sankar Mukherjee and others vs. Union of India and

others ((1990(Supp.) SCC 668 and Ram Singh and others Vs. Union Territory Chandigarh & others ( 2004 1 SCC 126).

It was also observed that the test for determining as to whether workers hired through contractor can be treated as

employees of the principal employer rests on the nature of the activity entrusted. Where nature of work entrusted to the

contract workers are integral part of the activity of the management and intervention of intermediary or contractor,

absence of direct relationship between worker and principal employer, including control by the principal employer,

payment of salary by the contractor and maintenance of attendance register by the contractor are not of any consequence,

particularly more so when the nature of job entrusted to such contract workers is the same as one done by regular

employees. Agreement in the said case was held to be sham and camouflage. Situation in the case in hand is in no way

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938

2345

different. It is clear from evidence on record that workman herein was being paid salary by the contractor through

officials of Ashok Hotel. Work of cashier, as per statement of MW1 is regular and perennial in nature. It is further clear

that contract Ex.WW2/5 was awarded to M/s Recruitment Bureau initially for a period of three years and he has simply

provided workforce to Ashok Hotel, whose officials were supervising and were having effective control over working of

such employees. Further, job of casher is very delicate and is in fact being performed by regular employees of Ashok

Hotel also. As a result of the discussions above and in the light of the ratio of decisions in the above judgements

coupled with evidence on record, contract in the case is held to be sham and a mere camouflage so as to deny

relationship of employer (Ashok Hotel) and workmen herein.

22.

It is further clear from the critical appraisal of the above judgements that services of the workman is taken in

connection with the work of the establishment, by the principal employer through contractor, in that eventuality,

contractor merely acts as an agent or a broker on behalf of the principal employer and the workman in such a situation

would continue to the a direct employee of the principal employer and not that of the agent or the broker. In the case in

hand also, it is clear from the evidence on record, that the workmen herein were admittedly working as Cashiers with the

management regularly, though alleged to be in the employment of M/s Recruitment Bureau. Supervisory control upon

him remained with that of the management.

23.

It is also clear from perusal of the Certified Standing Orders Ex.WW1/1 that Section III details with the

classification of employees and the same is reproduced as under:

Section 3 : Classification of Employees

a)

Permanent

b)

Temporary

c)

Badlis

d)

Casuals

e)

Probationers

24.

Since appointment of contact labour is not contemplated in the above Certified Standing Orders, as such, the

engagement of workmen through contract labour is patently against the law and Standing Orders Ex.WW2/1.

25.

Workman herein has also filed documents Ex.WW2/2 which deals with the deposit of provident fund of the

employees engaged by the employer. Similarly, document Ex.WW2/3 shows that contractor or the employer was not

depositing the provident fund etc. with the Trust so constituted under the Regulation, as a result of which exemption

granted to the management was withdrawn by the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Delhi, North. There is

another document, Ex.WW2/4, which shows the position of employees who were working in the establishment of the

management. During the course of arguments, it was not disputed that several posts of various categories are lying

vacant in the establishment of the management and have not been filled up so far as the Central Government has not

granted permission to fill up the same. In such a situation, one thing is crystal clear that though the work of the

workman herein who were admittedly working as Cashiers with the management is regular in nature, yet the

management is deploying workers through contractors. It is further clear that management has adopted this devise so as

to deprive the workmen of regular employment and deprive them of their permanent livelihood, which is totally against

the spirit of Contract Labour Act, 1970 wherein it is clearly provided that when a work is regular or permanent in nature,

there is no question of employing contract labour, particular when such labour is not covered by any clause mentioned in

Section III of the Certified Standing Order. This also amount to unfair labour practice.

26.

Admittedly, no notice whatsoever was served upon the workman herein before ordering his termination, as he

has been working since October 2006. Thus, in the case in hand, there is violation of Section 25F of the Act, which

requires that if a workman has worked continuously for 240 days in a calendar year, then the management is required to

issue notice to such workman, which has not been done in the case in hand. Thus, there is no merit in the contention of

the management that the workman herein was directly employed by M/s Recruitment Bureau. when the overall control

and supervision remained with the management.

27.

So far as question of regularization of the workman herein is concerned, this Tribunal cannot give directions for

regularization of the workman in view of the clear cut ratio of law in Steel Authority of India (supra) wherein it was held

that question of regularization is to be decided by the principal employer after taking into consideration the minimum

qualification, age as well as availability of posts. There is no such evidence to this effect brought on record, either by the

workman or the management. As such, plea of the workman for regularization cannot be entertained at this stage. This

is to be decided by the management after taking into consideration the necessary rules applicable to such employees

governing such regulation.

Issue No.(iv)

2346

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

28.

During the course of arguments, it was strongly urged on behalf of the management that M/s Recruitment

Bureau was a necessary party to the controversy and in the absence of its impleadment as a necessary party, reference

filed by the workman herein is not legally maintainable. Shri Upadhyay, authorized representative on behalf of the

workman countered the above submissions by urging that the workman herein was in the employment of the

management and that payment of wages were made to him through contractor with the prior approval of the

management, as such M/s. Recruitment Bureau is not a necessary party. To my mind, when reference has been made

under Section 10 of the Act by the appropriate Government, , this Tribunal does not have the power to implead a party.

Hence, there is no force in the contention of the management inasmuch as the management should have examined the

contractor M/s Recruitment Bureau so as to ascertain its terms and conditions. Moreover, M/s Recruitment Bureau is

simply a proper party and is not the necessary party for the adjudication of the controversy in question. Hence, this issue

is answered accordingly.

Relief

29.

Consequently, it is held that termination of the workman herein, i.e. from 20.09.2011 is held to be illegal and

workman herein are entitled to be reinstated. Since it has come in the evidence of the workman that he is unemployed

since the date of his termination and there being no evidence to the contrary led by the management, as such, the

workman herein is liable to be reinstated with full back wages from the date of his termination. An award is accordingly

passed. Let this award be sent to the appropriate Government, as required under Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes

Act, 1947, for publication.

Dated : April 21, 2016

A. C. DOGRA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 6 ebZ] 2016

dk-vk- 1052-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj lh-ih-MCY;w-

Mh- ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkj ds chp vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;&1] fnYyh ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 101@2013) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 05-05-2016 dks

izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&42012@237@2010&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)]

Ikh- ds- os.kqxksiky] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 6th May, 2016

S.O. 1052.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (I.D No. 101/2013) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal Cum-

Labour-Court No.1, Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to

the management of C.P.W.D. and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 05.05.2016.

[No. L-42012/237/2010-IR (DU)]

P. K. VENUGOPAL, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

IN THE COURT OF SHRI AVTAR CHAND DOGRA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT NO.1, KARKARDOOMA COURT COMPLEX, DELHI

ID No. 101/2013

Radhey Shyam Saini, S/o Shri Rattan Lal Singh, through

General Secretary,

CPWD Mazdoor Union,

A/o Room No.95, Barracks No.1/10,

Jam Nagar House, Shah Jahan Road,

New Delhi-110 001

…Workmen

Versus

The Director General ,

C.P.W.D.,

Nirman Bhawan,

New Delhi-110 001

…Managements

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938

2347

AWARD

Reference was received under Section 10 of sub-section 2(A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 for

adjudication from the Central Government vide letter No.L-42012/237/2010-IR(DU) dated 22.03.2016 and the terms of

reference are as under:

‘Whether the action of the management of CPWD, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi in terminating the services of

Shri Radhey Shyam Saini S/o Shri Rattan Lal Singh, ex-wireman, without any notice or pay in lieu of notice

period and retrenchment compensation is legal and justified? What relief the workman is entitled to and from

which date?

2. Backgrounds facts giving rise to the above reference are that Shri Radhey Shyam Saini (in short the workman

herein) was initially engaged as wireman with effect from 30.08.1999 and was performing his duties as pump operator

under the Executive Engineer, (Electrical), Electrical Division, XIV Sub Division IV, Pragati Maidan, New Delhi. Later

on, services of the workman herein were terminated without one months’ notice or salary in lieu thereof with effect from

14.10.2009.

3.

Workman herein had earlier filed a writ petition bearing No.2671 of 2000 in the High Court of Delhi for

regularization of his services directly under the management of CPWD as contract in the case was alleged to be sham

and camouflage. Hon’ble High Court vide judgement dated 26.11.2001 has given liberty to the workman herein to

approach the appropriate forum in accordance with the observations of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of Steel

Authority of India vs. National Union Water Front Workers Union (2001 Lab.I.C 3556). Copy of the above judgement is

enclosed as Annexure A with the statement of claim.

4.

Further, it is averred that the workman herein was working through a fake contractor, M/s Multi Trading

Engineers on a job of perennial nature and was designated as Generator Operator on 30.08.1999 but basically the

workman was performing major job of wireman and electrician as he was holding a valid licence from the Secretary

(Labour) Government of NCT Delhi. He was posted at Andaman and Nicobar Bhawan, Chanakyapuri, New Delhi

under Executive Engineer(Electrical) and he was under the direct employment of the respondent management through

the contractor. Relative details of the workman herein are as under:

‘Radhey Shyam Saini, the workman herein is passed 9th standard and at present is working as

Operator/Wireman with CPWD. The workman therein entered the services in the office of CPWD on

3008.1999 through M/s Multi Trading Engineers, the contractor. The workman has been working for more than

240 days in each of the calendar year under the control and supervision of the Junior Engineer, Assistant

Engineer etc.

5.

Workman herein had also raised an industrial dispute for regularization of his services after judgement of the

Hon’ble High Court dated 26.08.2001 and the same is still pending before the Secretary, Ministry of Labour,

Government of India, Shram Shakti Bhawan, New Delhi. Workman is in the employment of CPWD for more than

10 years and it is totally a misnomer to call services of the workman as being one through contractor. Officers of CPWD

alongwith the contractor are working in collusion with each other by adopting unfair means and to deny the benefits of

regular employment of the management of CPWD to the workman herein. Ministry of Labour, vide notification dated

21.07.2002, has prohibited employment of work, i.e. wiremen, electrician etc. and copy of the same is Annexure B.

Daily rated workers in CPWD who are performing similar work as that of the workman herein are getting regular

salary/wages from the date of their initial employment alongwith allowances etc. Copy of order of payment equal pay to

the daily rated persons is filed alongwith the claim. When the workman herein demanded regularization of his services,

management terminated his services, without following due procedure under the law. It is also the case of the workman

that after abolition of contract labour vide notification dated 21.07.2002, workman herein is to be treated as direct

employee of management of CPWD. Workman has also annexed his licence/certification of completing Class 10.

6.

Claim of the workman was resisted by the management by filing reply thereto and have taken preliminary

objections, including that the claim is liable to be dismissed as office of DG((W) CPWD is not an industry nor an

industrial establishment or industrial undertaking so as to attract provisions of the ID Act. CPWD is a Central

Government Department and is performing sovereign functions of the State as enshrined in Constitution of India. Copy

of judgement passed by CGIT, Jaipur is also filed with the reply. It is further alleged that the reference is devoid of any

merits and as such this Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to try the present dispute.. Reference was made to the

judgement of Hon’ble High Court of Delhi in which the case of the workman was dismissed vide order dated

26.09.2001. On merits, material averments have been denied by the management. It is denied that the workman herein

has worked with the management at any point of time. Workman was engaged by the contractor, M/s Parmar Electricals

who was assigned the contract. It is also denied that the workman herein was under the employment of the management

for more than 10 years. It is further denied that the workman was working under Multi Trading Engineers. Since the

2348

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

workman has never been directly in the employment of the management, hence question of his completing 240 days in a

calendar year does not arise at all. Workman is not even a casual worker of CPWD. Management has also made

reference to Surinder Singh & Others vs. The Engineer-in-Chief stating that said judgement is not applicable to the case

of the workman herein in view of the ratio of judgement in State of Karnataka Vs. Uma Devi (2006) (4) SCC I) wherein

Hon’ble Apex Court observed that when a workman is not engaged in accordance with due procedure, his services

cannot be regularized nor he can claim any relief. Further, judgement of the Apex Court in Airport Authority of India

has been prospectively overruled by the Supreme Court in Steel Authority of India and others Vs. National Union

Waterfront Workers and others (2001) 7 SCC 1) wherein it is observed that section 10 of the CLRA Act empowers the

employer to engage contract labour and principal employ canoe be ordered absorption of contract labour as a matter of

right. Management has denied other averments contained in the remaining paras. It has been specifically alleged that in

the present case, work was allotted to CPWD for carrying out electrical services at Andaman and Nicobar Bhawan,

Chanakyapuri. Since CPWD could not perform the said work, it was awarded to a contractor. Workman was directly

under the control and supervision of the Contraction , who in turn was answerable to CPWD. Against this factual

background, my learned predecessor vide order dated 07.10.2013 framed the following issues from the pleadings of the

parties:

(1)

Whether there exists relationship of employer and employee between the parties?

(2)

Whether claimant was an employee of the contractor?

(3)

As in terms of reference

7.

Workman in support of his case examined himself and tendered in evidence his affidavit Ex.WW1/A and also

tendered in evidence various documents, i.e. Ex.WW1/1 to Ex.WW1/4 and management in order to rebut the case of the

workman examined Shri M.P. Sharma as MW1 and his affidavit is Ex.MW1/A. He has tendered in evidence documents

Ex.MW1/1 to Ex.MW1/12. Initially the management examined Shri Roop Lal who tendered in evidence his affidavit.

However, later on, he was not available for his cross examination, as such, Shri M.P. Sharma was examined by the

management as MW1. I would be adverting to the same in the subsequent paras while drawing my conclusions.

Findings on Issue No.1 and 2

8.

Both these issues are being taken up together for the purpose of discussion as they are inter related and can be

conveniently disposed of.

9.

Shri B.K. Prasad, authorized representative appearing on behalf of the workman herein urged that the workman

was initially engaged by the management on 30.08.1999 and thereafter he is regularly performing his job under the

supervision and control of the management of CPWD. The so called agreement executed by the management with the

contractor is a fake document and workman is not aware of the same. Workman was performing job in the manner

being directed by officials of CPWD and the workman has not even seen the face of the contractor during his entire

service.

10.

Case of contractor Multi Trading Engineers and job which the workman was performing is regular and

perennial nature. He was designated as generator operator after 30.08.1999 and he was also performing major job of

Electrician/wireman as he was having valid licence or the same. Learned authorized representative also placed reliance

upon Steel Authority of India and others Vs. National Union Waterfront Workers and others(supra) and a few other

judgements in support of his submission so as to allege that the so called contract between the management and the

contractor is only a fake and sham document. Contractor is simply a name lender and has no control over the working of

the workman herein, whose work in fact was being directly scrutinized and supervised by the officials of CPWD. Work

of the workman was technical in nature and could not have been supervised by the contractor, who has no knowledge of

the same.

11.

Per contra, Ms.Avtar Kaur Dhingra, authorized representative appearing on behalf of the management urged the

workman herein was never in the direct employment of CPWD nor he was recruited in a regular manner by inviting

application from eligible candidates. He has never appeared before any Board or gave interview nor any letter of

appointment was issued to him. Status of the workman herein, at the most, is that of casual or contract labour whose

services have been terminated by the contractor who has engaged him. Attention of this Tribunal was also invited to the

case of State of Karnataka Vs. Uma Devi(supra), wherein Hon’ble Apex Court has held that where recruitment has not

been made in accordance with the rules or regulations or his employment is through back door entry, there is no question

of giving any regular employment to such employees.

12.

Before I proceed to consider the comparative merits of the submissions raised on behalf of either of the parties,

it is necessary to mention here that during the course of arguments, it was not disputed that contract was awarded by the

management to different contractors, though the management witness, MW1 has feigned ignorance whether Shri Radhey

Shyam Saini was operating pump of CPWD from 30.09.1999. However, no evidence was brought on record by the

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938

2349

management to show as to who was performing this function. It was admitted that matter was also taken before making

reference to this Tribunal to the Assistant Labour Commissioner, as is clear from the failure report, Ex.WW1/7. Shri

M.P. Sharma MW1 has also admitted that no notice before termination was given to the workman herein as he was not

directly employed by the management. However, he has admitted that CPWD has assigned the work of operation of

pump to the contractor, who has employed the workman. The work at Andaman and Nicobar Bhawan, Chanakyapuri

was allotted to CPWD, which was being done through contractor. He further admitted that CPWD was the owner of the

said pump. Later on, this witness made a vital admission, after Ex.WW1/2 was shown, that the workman herein was

doing the work of wireman/electrician. He further admitted that Ex.WW1/4 is licence of the workman herein. It is not

out of place to mention here that even in the affidavit, it is admitted that in the present case work was allotted to CPWD

to carry out maintenance work of electric services at Andaman and Nicobar Bhawan, Chanakyapuri of CPWD at New

Delhi. Further it is clear from agreements, Ex,MW1/1 to Ex.MW1/12 that from 1999-2000 till 2009-2010, work of

maintenance etc, has been given to M/s Multi Trading Engineers, M/s Paramjit Singh Walia, M/s Naini Electricals, SK

Consumer Services etc. Perusal of certificate of the workman herein shows that his date of birth is 16.06.1965 and he

has studied upto the 10th class. There is another letter Ex.WW1/6 issued by Government of India to all the

Superintendent Engineers regarding regularization of the muster roll/casual workers of CPWD as a one-time measure.

There is nothing on record to show that the case of the workman herein was not considered in view of the above letter.

Perusal of letter Ex.MW1/14 shows that no complaint of any labour was received against the contractor and award letter

shows that the work was awarded to M/s Multi Engineering Works, whose tender was accepted from 01.05.1999.

Management has not taken care to examine any of the contractors who were awarded works from time to time from

1999 till 2010, so as to show that the work was being directly done through contractors, who were having full

and effective control over such workmen who were working for the benefit of the management of CPWD. Examination

of the contractor in the case was also necessary so as to ascertain as to who was marking attendance of the said workmen

or making payment of salary, whether EPF and ESI were being deducted from the salary of the workmen. There is no

merit in the contention of the management that examination of the contractor should have been from the side of the

workman, who has to prove the contract. Since the workman herein has from the very beginning alleged that the above

contracts are fake/sham, therefore, it was imperative for the management to have examined the contractor to whom the

management had awarded the works from time to time. Admittedly, the workman herein is not a party to such contract.

Therefore, the workman is not aware of the terms and conditions contained in the above agreement, which were filed

very late during the course of evidence of the management.

13.

Now, the vital question which arises for determination is as to whether the workman herein was an employee of

the contractor or contracts in the present case from 1999 onwards as placed on record by the management are fake, sham

and nominal.

14.

Equally vital is the question whether there existed relationship of employer and employee between the parties,

in case it is held that the contract in the above case is fake. During the course of arguments, strong reliance was placed

upon the judgement of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Steel Authority of India Vs. National Union Water Front

Workers Union (supra). In the above case, Hon’ble Apex Court has considered extensively various provisions of the

Industrial Disputes Act as well As contract Labour Act 1970, alongwith relevant notification issued under Section 10 of

the CLRA Act, 1970. One of the questions which arose in the above case was regarding ambit and scope of

‘appropriate Government’ as defined in Section 2 (1)(a) of the CLRA Act. Incidentally, Hon’ble Apex Court also dealt

with the question of sham and camouflage contracts/agreements. Critical appraisal of the above judgements also shows

that Hon’ble Apex Court has taken into consideration the entire spectrum of the case law on the subject and held in Para

107 as under:

107. An analysis of the cases, discussed above, shows that they fall in three classes: (i) where contract labour is

engaged in or in connection with the work of an establishment and employment of contract labour is prohibited

either because the industrial adjudicator/court ordered abolition of contract labour or because the appropriate

Government issued notification under Section 10(1) of the CLRA Act, no automatic absorption of the contract

labour working in the establishment was ordered; (ii) where the contract was found to be a sham and nominal,

rather a camouflage, in which case the contract labour working in the establishment of the principal employer

were held, in fact and in reality, the employees of the principal employer himself. Indeed, such cases do not

relate to abolition of contract labour but present instances wherein the Court pierced the veil and declared the

correct position as a fact at the stage after employment of contract labour stood prohibited; (iii) where in

discharge of a statutory obligation of maintaining a canteen in an establishment the principal employer availed

the services of a contractor the courts have held that the contract labour would indeed be the employees of the

principal employer.

15.

The Court ruled that neither section 10 of the Contract Labour Act nor any other provision in that Act, whether

expressly or by necessary implication, provides for automatic absorption of contract labour on issuance of a notification

by the appropriate Government under sub section (1) of section 10, prohibiting employment of contract labour, in any

2350

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

process, operation or other work in any establishment. Consequently the principal employer cannot be required to order

for absorption of the contract labour working in the establishment concerned. It was further ruled therein that in

Saraspur Mills case (1974 (3) SCC 66), the workman engaged for working in the canteen run by the Cooperative

Society for the appellant were the employees of the appellant mills. In Basti Sugar Mills (AIR 1964 S.C. 355) a canteen

was run in the factory by the Co-operative Society and as such the workers working in the canteen were held to be

employees of the establishment. The Apex Court ruled that these cases fall in class (3) mentioned above. Judgment in

Hussainbhai (1978 Lab.I.C. 1264) was considered by the Apex Court in the said precedent and it was ruled therein that

the said precedent falls in class (2), referred above. The Apex Court concluded that on issuance of prohibitive

notification under section 10 of the Contract Labour Act prohibiting employment of contract labour or otherwise, in an

industrial dispute brought before it by any contract labour in regard to conditions of service, the Industrial Adjudicator

will have to consider the question whether the contractor has been interposed either on the ground of having undertaken

to produce any given result for the establishment or for supply of contract labour for work of the establishment under a

genuine contract or is a mere ruse/camouflage to evade compliance of various beneficial legislation so as to deprive the

workers of the benefit thereunder. If the contract is found to be not genuine but a mere camouflage, the so called contract

labour will have to be treated as employees of the principal employer who shall be directed to regularize the services of

the contract labour in the establishment concerned, subject to the conditions as may be specified by it for that purpose.

16.

As announced by the Apex Court, on issuance of a prohibitive notification , prohibiting employment of contract

labour or otherwise in any industrial dispute brought before it by the contract labour in regard to conditions of his

service, the industrial adjudicator will have to consider the question whether the contractor has been interposed either on

the ground of having undertaken to produce any given result in the establishment or for supply of the contract labour for

the work of the establishment under a genuine contract or it is a mere ruse/camouflage to evade compliance of beneficial

legislation so as to deprive the workers of the benefits therein. Thus it was ruled that a contract labour can raise a dispute

before the industrial adjudicator in regard to his conditions of service and in case the contract is found to be not genuine

but a mere camouflage, the so called contract labour will have to be treated as employees of the principal employer. Also

see Standard Vacuum Refining Co. of India Ltd. (1960 (II) LLJ. 233), which was referred with approval in Steel

Authority of India.

17.

In Shivnandan Sharma (1955(1) LLJ 688), the respondent Bank entrusted its Cash Department under a contract

to the Treasures who appointed cashiers, including the appellant Head Cashier. The question before the Apex Court was:

was the appellant an employee of the Bank? On construction of the agreement entered into the Bank and the Treasure,

the Court laid down:

“If a master employs a servant and authorizes him to employ a number of persons to do a particular job and to

guarantee their fidelity and efficiency for a cash consideration, the employees thus appointed by the servant

would be equally with the employer, servant of the master.”

18.

In the above precedent the Hon’ble Apex Court for the first time laid down the crucial test of supervision and

control for determining the relationship of employer and employee.

19.

In Hussainbhai (supra) the petitioner, who was manufacturing ropes, entrusted the work to a contractor who

engaged his own workers. When, after some time, the workers were not engaged, they raised an industrial dispute that

they were denied employment by the petitioner. On reference of that dispute, the labour court passed an award against

the petitioner. When matter reached the Apex Court, on examination of various factors and applying the effective control

test, it was held that though there was no direct relationship between the petitioner and the workers yet on lifting the veil

and looking at the conspectus of factors governing employment, the naked truth, though draped in different perfect paper

arrangement, was that the real employer was the petitioner, not the immediate contractor. The Apex Court stated law in

following words:

“Where a worker or group of workers labours to produce goods or services and these goods or services are for

the business of another, that other is, in fact, the employer. He has economic control over the workers’

subsistence, skill, and continued employment. If he, for any reason, chokes off, the worker is, virtually, laid off.

The presence of intermediate contractor with whom alone the workers have immediate or direct relationship ex-

contractu is of no consequence when, on lifting the veil or looking at the conspectus of factors governing

employment, we discern the naked truth, though draped in different perfect paper arrangement, that the real

employer is the management, not the immediate contractor***. If the livelihood of the workmen substantially

depends on labour rendered to produce goods and services for the benefit and satisfaction of an enterprise, the

absence of direct relationship or the presence of dubious intermediaries or the make-believe trappings of

detachment from the management cannot snap the real-life bond. The story may vary but the inference defies

ingenuity. The liability cannot be shaken off. Of course, if there is total dissociation in fact between the

disowning management and the aggrieved workmen, the employment is, in substance and real-life terms, by

another. The management’s adventitious connections cannot ripen into real employment.”

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938

2351

20.

As noted above, this precedent does not present an illustration of abolition of contract labour but an instance

where the Court pierced the veil and declared the correct position to the effect that the contract labours were employees

of the principal employer and not of the contractor.

21.

In Steel Authority of India (supra) it has been ruled that the term “contract labour” is a species of workman. A

workman may be hired : (1) in an establishment by the principal employer or by his agent with or without the knowledge

of the principal employer, or (2) in connection with the work of an establishment by the principal employer through a

contractor or by a contractor with or without the knowledge of principal employer. Where a workman is hired in or in

connection with the work of an establishment by the principal employer through a contractor, he merely acts as an agent

so there will be master and servant relationship between the principal employer and the workman. But when a workman

is hired in or in connection with the work of an establishment by a contractor, either because he has undertaken to

produce a given result for the establishment or because he supplies workmen for any work of the establishment, a

question might arise whether the contractor is a mere camouflage as in Hussainbhai’s case (supra) and in Indian

Petrochemicals Corporation case (1999 (6) S.C.C. 439) etc.; if the answer is in affirmative, the workman will be in fact

an employee of the principal employer, but if the answer is in the negative, the workman will be a contract labour.

22.

This Tribunal has to keep one thing in mind that the Industrial Disputes Act as well as Contract Labour Act are

essentially social and beneficial legislation. The scheme of the Contract Labour Act 1970 is to regulate conditions of

workers under the contract labour system and to provide for its abolition by the appropriate Government as provided

under Section 10 of the said Act. Section 7 of the Act requires the principal employer to get itself registered. Section 12

of the said Act bars a contractor from undertaking or executing any work through contract labour, except under and in

accordance with a licence issued. Section 23, 24 and 25 of the Act makes contravention of provisions of the Act

punishable there-under. There is also requirement for the principal employer of the establishment to get itself registered

under the Act so as to avail the benefit of provisions of the Act.

23.

Reliance was also placed upon the case of Management of Ashok Hotel vs. Their Workmen decided on

19.02.2013 in WP(C) No.14828/2006 wherein similar question was involved. It was a case where various workmen

were working continuously as safaiwala/Housemen in the kitchen department etc. and they were alleged to be working

directly under the contactor who has entered into a contract with the principal employer, i.e. Ashok Hotel. Strong

reliance was placed on behalf of the workmen upon ratio of the case in Steel Authority of India (supra) and contention of

the management to the effect that workmen were employees of the contractor was rejected. Further, contract in the said

case was also held to be sham and camouflage so as to deny direct relationship of employer (Ashok Hotel) and the

workmen.

24.

In the case of Haryana State Electricity Board vs. Suresh, 1999 LLJ 1086) Hon’ble Apex Court again dealt with

the question of engagement of contract labour. It was a case where Haryana State Electricity Board had outsourced

work of maintenance of electricity to a private contractor who was not a duly lilcenced contractor under the Contract

Labour & Regulations Act, 1970. The workers engaged had put in more than 240 days in a calendar year and they were

doing the work under supervision and control of the Electricity Board. After discussing the ratio of various authorities

on the subject, Hon’ble Apex Court lifted the veil for determination of real employer-employee relationship and held

that maintenance work is not seasonal work and the employees as a matter of fact were doing work under supervision

of the Board. Even their attendance was being marked by officials of the Board. As such, the said contract was held to

be sham and camouflage. The contractor was held to be merely a name lender or a broker. Thus, it is clear from ratio of

the above authority that the Tribunal has ample power to peep into contract and ascertain the real nature of the work

being done by the employees who are alleged by the management to be employees of the contractor.

25.

Again in BHEL vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2003 Lab.IC 2630 (4) , question of contract labour was considered

by the Hon’ble Apex Court wherein emphasis was laid upon the control test and it was held that where the contract on

the face of it is sham and nominal, rather camouflage, then the workman working in the establishment of the principal

employer, who is having control over the nature of work, in that eventuality, having due regard to the facts and

circumstances of the case, it was held that the workman was directly the employee of the principal employer and not the

contractor.

26.

In the case in hand also, the workman herein was admittedly working in the premises of the principal employer

at Andaman and Nicobar Bhawan, Chanakyapuri and was doing similar work which the other workmen were doing.

This Tribunal cannot ignore the fact that no evidence of the contractor has been led so as to show that the workman

herein was not working since 1999. Rather, employment of the workman herein has been admitted in so many words

indirectly by the management, who has come with the plea that he was in the employment of the contractor and not

directly under the management. There is nothing on record to show that any notice was served on the workman herein

as required under Section 25F of the Act, before his termination, nor there is any direct proof of payment of wages of

one month in lieu of notice. No contractor to whom work was allotted after 1999 till 2010 has been examined by the

management so as to show that the contractor was directly responsible for supervisory control over the workman herein

2352

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

and that he was also paying wages to such workers. Under the CLRA Act, it is the duty of the principal employer to

ensure compliance of various provisions of the Act and Section 21 of the said Act postulates that the contractor shall be

responsible for payment of wages of the workmen and in case contractor fails to make payment of wages within the

prescribed period, then the principal employer shall be liable to make payment of such wages. Thus, termination of the

job of the workman herein also amounts to unfair labour practice, particularly when there is nothing adverse against the

workman since his employment in 1998-99. Work performed by the workman herein is not casual or seasonal in nature

as is clear from pleadings on record. Moreover, the said work is regular and perennial in nature. In such a situation, it

can be concluded that the so called award of work to the various contractors is simply a device invented by the

management to deny the workman herein the status of being directly under the control of the management.

27.

There is no merit in the contention of the management that the workman was not precluded by inviting

application in accordance with law. I have carefully gone through the ratio of judgement in State of Karnataka vs Uma

Devi(supra) and the same is not applicable so far as question of engagement of contract labour through contractor is

concerned.

28.

The learned authorized representative of management No.1 and 2 also relied upon the case of State of

Karnataka vs Uma Devi(1998) SCC 1. I have carefully gone through the ratio of the above authority and the same is not

applicable so far as the question of engagement of contract labour through contractor is concerned. Hon’ble Apex Court

in ONGC vs. Petroleum Coal Labour Union (2015) Lab IC 2483, has considered the ratio in Uma Devi (supra) and held

that even if due procedure was not followed in the appointment of concerned workmen in the post of watch and ward

security, this does not disentitle them of their right to seek regularization of their services by the Corporation under the

provisions of certified standings orders as they have rendered more than 240 days of service in a calendar year from the

date of their appointment in the year 1988. In the said case also, Corporation has outsourced security to private

contractor. However, in 1976, notification was issued for abolition of contract labour for the post of watch and security

men etc. In the said case also strong plea was raised on behalf of the management that in view of ratio of law in Uma

Devi case, workers are not entitled to be regularized after abolition of contract labour. This contention of the

management/Government was rejected by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in ONGC(supra):

‘Uma Devi does not denude the Industrial and Labour Courts of their statutory power under Section 30 read

with Section 32 of the MRTU and PULP Act to order permanency of the workers who have been victims of

unfair labour practice on the part of the employer under Item 6 of Schedule IV where the posts on which they

have been working exist. Umadevi cannot be held to have overridden the powers of the Industrial and Labour

Courts in passing appropriate order under Section 30 of the MRTU and the PULP Act, once unfair labour

practice on the part of the employer under Item 6 of Schedule IV is established.”

29.

There are specific observations in the above judgement that provision of the Industrial Disputes Act and the

powers of the Industrial and Labour Courts were not at all under consideration in Uma Devi case. Issue pertaining to

unfair labour practice was neither the subject matter of decision nor the same was denuded in Uma Devi Case.

Therefore, reliance placed by the management herein upon Uma Dev Case so far as question of contract labour being

sham or camouflage agreement is concerned, is totally misplaced and is of no help to Management No.1 and 2. Since in

the case in hand, engagement of contract labour through private contractor is specifically prohibited in view of the

notification issued by the Central Government, as such deployment of wiremen through so called contractor is held to be

of no use and the said contract as stated above are stated to be legally null and void. Act of the management are means

of unfair labour practice.

30.

Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Ajay Pal Singh vs. Haryana Warehousing Corporation (2015) 6 SC 321

again considered ratio of Uma Devi case (supra) relied upon by the management and held as under:

‘When no such plea is taken by the employer in the order of retrenchment that the workman was appointed in

violation of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India or in violation of any statutory rule or his

appointment was a backdoor appointment, while Page 15 granting relief, the employer cannot take a plea that

initial appointment was in violation of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India, in absence of a reference

made by the appropriate Government for determination of question whether the initial appointment of the

workman was in violation of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India or statutory rules. Only if such

reference is made, a workman is required to lead evidence to prove that he was appointed by following

procedure prescribed under the Rules and his initial appointment was legal.”

31.

Since in the case in hand, there is no reference made by the appropriate Government for determination of the

question whether appointment of the workmen herein is in violation of Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution or their

initial appointment is illegal or against the statutory rule, as such, Uma Devi case is not at all of any legal help to the

case of the management. It is also necessary to mention here that there is ample evidence on record that the workmen

herein were not even being paid minimum wages, which is statutory requirement under the Minimum Wages Act and the

same amounts to commission of unfair labour practice. Net result of the above discussion is that the contracts which

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938

2353

have been referred by Shri M.P. Sharma, Executive Engineer, in his statement, are not of any use so as to hold the

workmen hereunder to be in the employment of the contractor inasmuch as issuance of prohibition notification under

Section 10 of the Contract Labour Act 1970, where post of wiremen is mentioned in the prohibition clause. After

issuance of the above notification, management was required to fill up the post (wiremen) in accordance with rules and

regulations. Management has admitted that still there are some regular workmen working in the department. It also

shows that the work of wiremen is regular and perennial in nature. In such situation, the so called agreements between

the contractor and the management herein are held to be legally void, sham and camouflage so as to bar the workmen

herein from claiming status of being in the employment and control of CPWD.

32.

It is clear from perusal of contracts/agreements Ex.MW1/1 to Ex.MW1/12 that the same were entered between

the Management of CPWD and various contractors from 1999 to 2010, a careful perusal of the which would show that

they are same in every respect. They are standard documents and only name of the contractors from to time has been

changed and all these agreements are admittedly for a period of one year. As already held, the above documents are

simply sham and camouflage so as to deprive the workmen of their status of being directly under employment of the

principal employer, i.e. CPWD, as such, these documents/agreements are even otherwise contrary to the notification,

issued under Section 10 of the Contract Labour Act, 1970, as such legally void. As a result of the above discussion, it is

held that there is no privity of contract between the workmen and CPWD. As such issue No.1 and 2 are decided

against the management and reference is answered in favour of the workman herein.

Issue No.3 - Relief

33.

As a sequitur to my aforesaid discussions, it is held that the workman is entitled to be reinstated after their so

called termination without any notice with effect from 14.10.2009 and payment of back wages with all consequential

benefits since he remained unemployed after his termination on 14.10.2009 till date. An award is accordingly passed.

Let this award be sent to the appropriate Government, as required under Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947,

for publication.

Dated : April 29, 2016

A. C. DOGRA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 18 ebZ] 2016

dk-vk- 1053.—deZpkjh jkT; chek vfèfu;e] 1948¼1948 dk 34½ dh èkjk&1 dh mi&èkjk ¼3½ }kjk iznRr 'kfDr;ksa dk

iz;ksx djrs gq,] dsUnzh; ljdkj ,rn~}kjk 01 twu] 2016 dks ml rkjh[k ds :i esa fu;r djrh gS] ftldks mDr vfèfu;e ds v/;k;&4 ¼44

o 45 èkjk ds flok; tks igys ls izo`Rr gks pqdh gaS½ v/;k;&5 vkSj 6 [èkjk&76 dh mi èkjk ¼1½ vkSj èkjk &77] 78 79 vkSj 81 ds

flok; tks igys gh izo`Rr dh tk pqdh gaS] ds micaè rsyaxkuk jkT; ds fuEufyf[kr {ks=ksa esa izo`Rr gksaxs] vFkkZr~%

^^le;&le; ij dk;kZfUor fd, x, rsyaxkuk jkT; ds {ks=ksa dks NksM+dj] rsyaxkuk jkT; ds jaxkjsM~Mh ftys ds jktLo xkaoksa ds lHkh

{ks=**

[la- ,l&38013@21@2016&,l-,l-&1]

vt; efyd] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 18th May, 2016

S.O. 1053.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (3) of Section 1 of the Employees' State

Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st June, 2016, as the date on which the

provisions of Chapter IV (except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force) and Chapter-V and VI

[except sub-section (1) of Section 76 and Sections 77, 78, 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force] of the

said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Telangana, namely:—

"All areas falling within the revenue villages of Ranga Reddy District of Telangana State except the areas

which have already been implemented from time to time."

[No. S-38013/21/2016-S.S.-I]

AJAY MALIK, Under Secy.

ubZ fnYyh] 18 ebZ] 2016

dk-vk- 1054.—deZpkjh jkT; chek vfèfu;e] 1948¼1948 dk 34½ dh èkjk&1 dh mi&èkjk ¼3½ }kjk iznRr 'kfDr;ksa dk

iz;ksx djrs gq,] dsUnzh; ljdkj ,rn~}kjk 01 twu] 2016 dks ml rkjh[k ds :i esa fu;r djrh gS] ftldks mDr vfèfu;e ds v/;k;&IV

2354

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

¼44 o 45 èkjk ds flok; tks igys ls izo`Rr gks pqdh gaS½ v/;k;& V vkSj VI [èkjk&76 dh mi èkjk ¼1½ vkSj èkjk &77] 78 79 vkSj 81

ds flok; tks igys gh izo`Rr dh tk pqdh gaS] ds micaè >kj[kaM jkT; ds fuEufyf[kr {ks=ksa esa izo`Rr gksaxs] uker~%%&

Ø-la-

ftyk dk uke

1-

jk¡ph

2-

jkex<+

3-

fxfjMhg

4-

dksMjek

5-

cksdkjks

6-

nso?kj

7-

ljk;dsyk&[kjlkok¡

8-

iwohZ ¯lgHkwe

9-

/kuckn

[lañ ,l&38013@20@2016&,l-,l-&1]

vt; efyd] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 18th May, 2016

S.O. 1054.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (3) of Section 1 of the Employees' State

Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st June, 2016, as the date on which the

provisions of Chapter IV (except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force) and Chapter-V and VI

[except sub-section (1) of Section 76 and Sections 77, 78, 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force] of the

said Act shall come into force in the following entire district (including already implemented) areas in the State of

Jharkhand, namely:—

Sl. No. Name of the District

1.

Ranchi

2.

Ramgarh

3.

Girdih

4.

Kderma

5.

Bokaro

6.

Deoghar

7.

Saraikella-Kharsawan

8.

East Singhbhum

9.

Dhanbad

[No. S-38013/20/2016-S.S.-I]

AJAY MALIK, Under Secy.

ubZ fnYyh] 25 ebZ] 2016

dk-vk- 1055-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ

chchlh,y ds izcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- 1] /uckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 03@2001) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 25-05-2016 dks

izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&20012@111@2000&vkbZvkj (lh,e&I)]

,e- ds- ¯lg] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 25th May, 2016

S.O. 1055.— In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government

hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1, Dhanbad

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938

2355

(Ref. No. 03 of 2001) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of M/s. BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 25.05.2016.

[No. L-20012/111/2000-IR(CM-I)]

M. K. SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO. 1) DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/s 10(1)(d)(2A) of I.D. Act, 1947

Ref. No. 03 of 2001

Employer in relation to the management of P.B. Area of M/s. BCCL

And

Their Workmen

Present : Sri Ranjan Kumar Saran, Presiding Officer

Appearances :

For the Employers

:

Shri D.K. Verma, Advocate

For the Workman

:

None

State : Jharkhand

Industry : Coal

Dated : 23.11.2015

AWARD

By Order No. L-20012/111/2000-IR(CM-I), dated 18.12.2000, the Central Government in the Ministry of

Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of

the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947, referred the following disputes for adjudication to this Tribunal :

SCHEDULE

“Whether the demand of the Union to provide employment to Shri Dukhan S/o Sri Remeshwar Mandal from

the management of P.B. Area M/s. BCCL, P.O. Kusunda, Dist. Dhanbad in terms of Award in Ref. 71/85 is

proper and justified? If so, to what relief is the person concerned entitled?”

2.

After receipt of the reference, parties are noticed, though they took steps for certain dates, subsequently did not

take any interest in the case by the workman. It is presumed that the disputes between parties have been resolved in the

meantime. Hence, No Dispute Award is passed.

R. K. SARAN, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 25 ebZ] 2016

dk-vk- 1056-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj ,lbZlh,y

ds izcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 85@2012) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 25-05-2016 dks izkIr

gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&22012@87@2012&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)]

jktsUæ ¯lg] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 25th May, 2016

S.O. 1056.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 85/2012) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of SECL Hq., Seepat Road,

2356

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Bilaspur, Central Excavation Workshop of SECL and their workmen, received by the Central Government on

25.05.2016.

[No. L-22012/87/2012-IR (CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/R/85/12

The President/ Secretary,

Bhartiya Koyla Khadan Mazdoor Sangthan (BMS),

Gevra Area, PO Gevra Project,

Distt. Korba, CG.

…Workman/ Union

Versus

General Manager,

Central Excavation Workshop of SECL,

Gevra Area, PO Gevra Project,

Korba, CG

…Management

AWARD

Passed on this 7th day of April 2016

1. As per letter dated 25-7-12 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is received.

The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.L-22012/87/2012-

IR(CM-II). The dispute under reference relates to:

“Whether the action of the General Manager, Central Excavation workshop of SECL, Gevra, Distt. Korba

(CG) in not giving the 16 holidays ( i.e. 8 paid holidays, 6 gazetted holidays and 2 Restricted holidays) and half

day working on satyurday to their employees working in CEWS, Gevra as that of given to Central Workshop

SECL, Korba is legal, proper and justified? To what relief the said workman is entitled and from what date/

period?”

2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to the parties. Workman failed to appear in the reference proceeding.

Workman was proceeded exparte on 28-3-2015.

3. 2nd party filed exparte Written Statement. Case of 2nd party is that Union raised present dispute demanding 16

holidays ( 8 paid holidays, 6 gazetted holidays, 2 RH)and half day working on Saturday in CWS Gevra Project. That the

demand made by Union is incorrect and denied. Central Workshop is of SECL. The employees in said workshop are

under control of General Manager of workshop. It is independent unit of SECL. The workshop is under administrative

and functional control of Chief General Manager excavation as per office order dated 31-8-02. The service conditions of

employees working in SECL are covered by certified standing orders. The certified standing orders applicable to SECL

Clause 11 provides that there shall be 8 paid festival holidays. Out of these 8 days, the Republic day, Miners day,

independence day and Mahatma Gandhi Birthday shall be allowed without option and remaining paid holidays shall be

fixed by agreement or local custom. Present practice in respect of Festival Holidays will however continue. That 16

holidays at Central Workshop Korba are restricted to only few employees as Executive and Monthly Staff of

Administrative Building of Central Workshop Korba and majority of executives staff and all daily rated workers

engaged in production in various shops get only 8 paid holidays.. w.r.t. half working day at CEWS Gevra is not

violating any rules or regulations in taking 8 hours work from employees at CEWS Gevra on Saturdays.

4. The coal mines were owned by private owners. The coal mines were nationalized to provide for the acquisition and

transfer of rights, title and interest of the owners in respect of coal mines specified in the schedule with a view to re

organizing and reconstructing such coal mines so as to ensure the rational coordinated and scientific development and

utilization of coal resources. For the purpose of proper administration and operation of the mines a company namely

Coal India Ltd is constituted which is a Govt of India undertaking having its 6 subsidiary companies, WCL, SECL,

Central Coalfields Ltd. BCCL, Eastern Coalfields Ltd. And NCL. The Central Govt. constituted a Central Wage Board

for Coal Industry. Both the workman and management appeared before the Wage Board and after examining the cases of

both parties, Wage Board submitted its recommendations fixing service conditions of employees and wages. The

service conditions of employees in the Industry is governed by the Wage Board Recommendations as accepted by the

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938

2357

Central Govt. There are more than 5 lacs of employees working in the coal industry in the State of Assam, Bengal,

Bihar, Orissa, UP, MP and Maharashtra. NCDC was a public sector company. Government colliery followed the

central Govt. Pay scale and working pattern which resulted in following Central Govt. pattern of working hours and

holidays. Due to some misunderstanding, ignorance and oversight in some collieries of NCDC a wrong working hours of

clerical staff were adopted as 6 hours and holidays were given on government pattern. It was stopped after

nationalization but some of the government companies taken over by NCDC service conditions were protected under

certain understanding as per agreement. The protection was some time misunderstood creating a wrong working hours

and holidays for some of the employees in NCDC Mines. That thousands of workers who were working 8 hours a day

and having 8 holidays protested against the illegal benefit given for few selected workers. It was necessary to have

common working hours, the service conditions, pay, service working in the same industry. Any discrimination is

impermissible. There can be no justification for giving favour/ advantage to selected workman. The universal practice in

India and other countries is of 8 hours working 48 hours in a week. The service conditions of employees working in

coal industry are covered by NCWA. For implementation of provisions of NCWA, there is a committee known as

JBCCI. Said committee is consisting of equal strength of members of recognized Central Trade Union and management.

The forum of JBCCI meant for making policy decision in respect of entire coal industry. The issue about working hours

discussed in the Committee on 3-6-88, 2-9-88 by representative of Union and management. The management

summarized the stand that enforcement of mandatory provisions of Mine Act Regulation notice under Section 9-A of

IDS Act and doesnot amount to change in service conditions. The employees covered under wage board are given

enhanced benefit under NCWA like LTC, LLTC, free supply of fuel, electricity, special leave for six months to those

who suffer from TB, Cancer, Leprosy etc. and benefits under social security scheme. The number of paid holidays in

each 9 establishment is restricted to 8 days as per NCWA.

5. 2nd party has also referred to NCWA-I – 1975, NCWA-III – 1983 leave and festival holidays continued as at

present. Vide clause 6.6 of NCWA-3, it was agreed that 7 paid holidays, Ist day of every year as paid holidays total 8

holidays. In NCWA-IV 1987, existing 8 national holidays will continue as at present.. it is reiterated that 8 paid holidays

were allowed which included Republic Day, Miners Day, Independence day and Birthday of Mahatma Gandhi without

option and remaining 4 paid holidays were to be allowed as per agreement. That the service conditions of employees

also provides for 8 paid holidays only the demand of Union for 16/18 holidays has no merit. On such ground, 2nd party

prays to answer reference in its favour.

6. Considering pleadings on record, the points which arise for my consideration and determination are as under. My

findings are recorded against each of them for the reasons as below:-

(i) Whether the action of the General Manager, Central

Excavation workshop of SECL, Gevra, Distt. Korba

(CG) in not giving the 16 holidays ( i.e. 8 paid holidays,

6 gazetted holidays and 2 Restricted holidays) and half

day working on satyurday to their employees working in

CEWS, Gevra as that of given to Central Workshop

SECL, Korba is legal, proper and justified?

In Affirmative

(ii) If not, what relief the workman is entitled to?”

Workmen are not entitled to any relief.

REASONS

7. Ist party Union did not participate in reference, it was proceeded exparte on 25-3-2015. Exparte Written Statement

is filed by management. Affidavit of evidence of management’s witness Shri G.L.N.Durga Prasad is filed supporting

contentions of management in Written Statement.

8. Management’s witness has reiterated that as per NCWA & wage board recommendations, the service conditions of

the employees are covering the benefit of 8 paid holidays are allowed. The evidence of management’s witness remained

unchallenged as Ist party workman failed to participate in reference proceeding, I find no reason to discard evidence of

management’s witness. As Ist party failed to file statement of claim or adduce evidence in support of the dispute raised

by it, I record my finding in Point No.1 in Affirmative.

9. In the result, award is passed as under:-

(1)

The action of the management is proper and legal.

(2)

Workman is not entitled to any relief.

R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer

2358

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ubZ fnYyh] 25 ebZ] 2016

dk-vk- 1057-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj bZlh,y ds

izcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k@Je

U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 06@2010) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 25-05-2016 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&22012@50@2009&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)]

jktsUæ ¯lg] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 25th May, 2016

S.O. 1057.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 06/2010) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Kumardihi A Colliery of

M/s. ECL and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 25.05.2016.

[No. L-22012/50/2009-IR (CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL

PRESENT:

Sri Pramod Kumar Mishra, Presiding Officer

REFERENCE NO. 06 OF 2010

PARTIES:

The management of Kumardihi ‘A’ Colliery of M/s. ECL.

Vs.

Sri Ghena Pradhan & 14 others

REPRESENTATIVES:

For the management

:

Sri P. K. Das, Ld. Advocate

For the union (Workman)

:

Sri Sushil Banerjee

INDUSTRY: COAL

STATE : WEST BENGAL

Dated: 02.05.2016

AWARD

In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-section(1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947), Govt. of India through the Ministry of Labour vide its letter NO. L-

22012/50/2009-IR(CM-II) dated 21.01.2010 has been pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by this

Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of Kumardihi A Colliery under Bankola Area of M/s. Eastern

Coalfields Limited, in denying group wages of Piece Rated Trammers w.e.f. 29.11.2005 till regularization i.e.

16.08.2008 to Sri Ghena Pradhan & 14 others (as per list enclosed) is legal and justified? To what relief is the

workman concerned entitled? ”

1.

Having received the Order NO. L-22012/50/2009-IR(CM-II) dated 21.01.2010 of the above said reference

from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference case No. 06 of 2010

was registered on 11.02.2010 and accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through the registered

post to the parties concerned directing them to appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their written statements

along with the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance of the said order

notices by the registered post were sent to the parties concerned.

2.

Case called out. Sri P. K. Das, learned advocate is present on behalf of the management but none appears on

behalf of the workmen / union.

3.

On perusal of the case record, I find that the workmen / union last appeared before the Tribunal on 26.06.2013.

Thereafter more than 2½ (Two and a half) years and 13 (Thirteen) dates have passed but neither the workmen nor the

union appeared before the Tribunal to contest the case. Registered notice was issued to the union on 12.08.2014 and

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938

2359

seven more dates were granted after the notice but none appeared to represent the workmen or union. It seems that the

union/workmen do not want to proceed with the case further. As such the case is closed and a ‘No Dispute Award’ is

hereby passed accordingly.

ORDER

Let an “Award” be and same is passed as no dispute existing. Send the copies of the order to the Govt.

of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, for information and needful. The reference is accordingly disposed of.

PRAMOD KUMAR MISHRA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 25 ebZ] 2016

dk-vk- 1058-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj bZlh,y ds

izcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k@Je

U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 09@2008) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 25-05-2016 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&22012@02@2008&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)]

jktsUæ ¯lg] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 25th May, 2016

S.O. 1058.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 09/2008) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Dhanbad Colliery of

M/s. ECL and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 25.05.2016.

[No. L-22012/02/2008-IR (CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL

PRESENT:

Sri Pramod Kumar Mishra, Presiding Officer

REFERENCE NO. 06 OF 2010

PARTIES:

The management of Dalurband Colliery of M/s. E.C.L.

Vs.

Sri Upendra Bhuia

REPRESENTATIVES:

For the management

:

Sri P. K. Goswami, Ld. Advocate

For the union (Workman)

:

Sri S. K. Pandey, Gen. Secy. (CMC)

INDUSTRY : COAL

STATE : WEST BENGAL

Dated : 10.05.2016

AWARD

In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-section(1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947), Govt. of India through the Ministry of Labour vide its letter NO. L-

22012/2/2008–IR(CM-II) dated 11.03.2008 has been pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by this

Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of M/s. ECL in dismissing Sri Upendra Bhuia w.e.f. 20.10.2004 is

legal and justified? If not, to what relief is the workman entitled? ”

1. Having received the Order NO. L-22012/2/2008–IR(CM-II) dated 11.03.2008 of the above said reference from

the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference case No. 09 of 2008 was

registered on 17.03.2008. Accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through the registered post to

2360

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

the parties concerned, directing them to appear in the court, on the date fixed and to file their written statements along

with the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance of the said order notices by

the registered post were sent to the parties concerned. Both the parties appeared in the Tribunal, through their

representative.

2.

The workman Sri Upendra Bhuiya has in brief, stated in his written statement that he was in employment of the

company as Trammer at Dalurband Colliery under Pandeswar Area of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited. Due to his

sickness he was absent from duty w.e.f 17.02.2004. The management issued him Charge Sheet vide Charge Sheet No.

DBC/CS/47/87 dated 06/07.04.2004. The Charge Sheet and Enquiry Notice was not served to workman. But enquiry

was completed ex-parte without giving him any opportunity to defend himself, ignoring the principal of natural justice.

The service of the workman was dismissed w.e.f. 20.10.2004 without serving him 2nd Show Cause Notice. The workman

is sitting idle without any employment till date. Dismissal of Sri Upendra Bhuiya form the service of the company is

illegal and unjustified. The workman has prayed that the tribunal may kindly direct the management of Dalurband

Colliery under Pandeswar Area of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited to reinstate the workman in service with payment of

full back wages from the period of dismissal with all consequential benefits.

3.

The Agent of Dalurband Colliery of Pandeswar Area of M/s. Eastern Coalfields has stated in his written

statement, in brief that Mr. Bhuiya was found absent from 17.02.2004 without any reasons. For unauthorized absence as

well as due to habitual absence under clause 26.5, 26.23 and 26.29 of Standing Order applicable to the colliery Mr.

Bhuiya was charge sheeted. In the year 2000 the attendance was marked for 55 days, in 2001 for 14 days, in 2002

attendance was 85 days and in 2003 his attendance was 83 days. His performance was very bad therefore he was

awarded lenient punishment deducting at least 28 SPRA. Mr. Bhuiya did not reply to the charge sheet issued to him.

Management conducted domestic enquiry. But even after receiving the notice of enquiry he did not appear therefore the

enquiry was conducted ex-parte. From the Enquiry Report & other materials the charges levelled against him

were proved. Management having no other alternative terminated the services of Mr. Bhuiya. Punishment of dismissal

took place due to latches of concerned workman. The agent of Dalurband Colliery under Pandeswar Area of M/s.

Eastern Coalfields Limited has prayed the action of management in dismissing Mr. Bhuiya is justified and legal.

Workman is not entitled to any relief.

4.

Neither party to reference has filed any documentary evidence. The workman Sri Upendra Bhuiya has filed

affidavit dated 10.01.2013 in his oral evidence. He has been cross-examined by learned Advocate of M/s. Eastern

Coalfields Limited. The agent Dalurband Colliery under Pandeswar Area of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has not

filed any affidavit in his oral evidence.

5.

The reference belongs to year 2008. Notice was served on Dalurband Colliery under Pandeswar Area of M/s.

Eastern Coalfields Limited. The learned advocate of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited appeared on 13.05.2010. After

appearance of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited through advocate, even after fixing more than 30 dates M/s. Eastern

Coalfields Limited did not care to file authorization of his advocate. On 20.01.2015 the tribunal directed the

management to file authorization of his advocate and copy of Enquiry Proceeding, Enquiry Report, and Dismissal Order

and fixed 24.02.2015 as last chance. On 24.02.2015 and five dates thereafter M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited neither

files any documents regarding domestic enquiry nor authorization of his advocate. Since M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited

has precluded himself to be represented by an advocate tribunal has no option but to proceed further. Tribunal reserved

the reference for order. The union representative was present. The reference is being decided on merit.

6.

It is not disputed that Sri Upendra Bhuiya was in employment of the company as Trammer at Dalurband

Colliery under Pandeswar Area of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited. It is admitted fact that Sri Upendra Bhuiya was

dismissed from service w.e.f. 20.10.2004 by M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited. As per allegation of the workman Sri

Upendra Bhuiya the domestic enquiry was conducted against the workman ex-parte without any service of notice. He

was not afforded any opportunity to defend himself. Enquiry was conducted in violation of Principle of Natural Justice.

7.

At very outset, it is necessary to mention that M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has not filed any documentary

evidence regarding domestic enquiry. The Tribunal has provided ample opportunity to file copy of Enquiry Proceeding,

Enquiry Report, Dismissal Order and all relevant document connected with the domestic enquiry. But even after so

many dates M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited did not prefer to file even a single document in connection with the

domestic enquiry against Sri Upendra Bhuiya, the delinquent workman. If any document is in possession of any party

and in spite of direction of Tribunal or Court he does not file copy of those documents, which are very much relevant for

just decision of the reference, the tribunal is bound to draw adverse inference u/s 114(G) of Evidence Act against the

party withholding the documents. Since M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has failed to file copies of Enquiry Proceeding,

Enquiry Report, Dismissal Order, Charge Sheet, Reply of Workman, Notice of Enquiry which are in possession of M/s.

Eastern Coalfields Limited. it will be presumed that either there was no enquiry at all or if enquiry was conducted

against workman, it was vitiated due to non compliance of Principle of Natural Justice as alleged by workman.

8.

In Gopal Krishnaji Ketkar v/s Md. Haji Latif and others, AIR 1968 SC 1413, the Hon’ble Apex Court has held

that ;

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938

2361

“ Even if the burden of proof does not lay on a party the Court may draw an adverse inference if he withholds

important documents in his possession which can throw light on the facts at issue.”

9.

The workman has stated in his affidavit that he was a permanent and bona fide employee of M/s. Eastern

Coalfields Limited and posted at Dalurband Colliery under Pandeswar Area bearing designation as Trammer, U.M. No.-

741728. He was never issued any Charge Sheet or Enquiry Notice. He was dismissed from service illegally without

giving any opportunity to defend himself. After recovery from illness he was not allowed to join his duty. He belonged

to Schedule Cast community. His condition was very poor. At present he was without any income. For livelihood he

intends to join duty under M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited. Though, without filing authorization on behalf of M/s.

Eastern Coalfields Limited the learned advocate of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has cross-examined the workman,

Sri Upendra Bhuiya. The workman has not stated any fact in his cross-examination repugnant to the statement contained

in his affidavit. There is no reason to disbelieve the statement of the workman stated on oath.

10.

The agent, Dalurband Colliery under Pandeswar Area of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has stated in Para-6

of his written statement that even after receiving the notice of enquiry the workman did not appear as a result of which

the enquiry was conducted ex-parte. But there is no evidence on record to support this allegation. There is no

documentary evidence that when notice was sent to the workman and on which date it was served on concerned

workman. Even there is no evidence that in fact any notice was sent to the workman or whether the workman was kept

informed for the proposed enquiry. Even if the enquiry was conducted ex-parte there is no copy of document of enquiry

proceeding to substantiate the allegation of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited.

11.

In A. K. Kraipak v/s Union of India AIR 1970 SC 150 the Hon’ble Supreme Court has held that;

“ The aim of the rules of natural justice is to secure justice or to put it negatively to prevent miscarriage of

justice. These rules can operate only in areas not covered by any law validly made. In other words they do not

supplant the law of the land but supplement it. The concept of natural justice has undergone a great deal of

change in recent years. In the past it was thought that it included just two rules namely (1) no one shall be a

judge in his own case (Nemo debet esse judex propria causa) and (2) no decision shall be given against a party

without affording him a reasonable hearing (audi alteram partem). Very soon, a third rule was envisaged and

that is that quasi judicial enquiries must be held in good faith, without bias and not arbitrarily or unreasonably

and it went on to hold;

‘ If the purpose of the rules of natural justice is to prevent miscarriage of justice one fails to see why those rules

should be made inapplicable to administrative enquiries. Often times it is not easy to draw the line that

demarcates administrative enquiries from quasi judicial enquiries. Enquiries which were considered

administrative at one time are now being considered as quasi judicial in character. Arriving at a just decision is

the aim of both quasi judicial enquiries as well as administrative enquiries. An unjust decision in an

administrative enquiry may have more far reaching effect than a decision in a quasi-judicial enquiry’. ”

12.

In State of U.P. v/s Saroj Kumar Sinha 2010 (124) FLR 857 the Hon’ble Apex Court has held that;

“ Enquiry officer acting in a quasi judicial authority is in the position of an independent adjudicator. He is not

supposed to be a representative of the department / Government. His function is to examine the evidence

presented by the department, even in the absence of the delinquent official to see as to whether the unrebutted

evidence is sufficient to hold that the charges are proved.”

13.

So far as previous absence is concerned, it is settled law that if past record of a government servant, if it is

intended to be relied upon by imposing a punishment then there should be specific charge in the first stage of enquiry

itself. If it is not done, so it cannot be relied upon after the enquiry is closed and the report is submitted to the authority

entitled to impose the punishment. The punishing authority cannot impose punishment for previous record if the

delinquent employee has not been charge sheeted for previous record.

14.

Every industry or establishment laid down certain rules and regulation apart from government’s rules and

regulation for better, effective and efficient working of an industry. For such purpose an industry also constitutes its own

rules as per the provision of labour and industrial laws so as to punish those employees who commits any wrong or

misconduct under the course of employment. Disciplinary proceedings will judge the degree and consequences of

misconduct committed by an employee. In deciding whether in a particular case an act of misconduct is serious enough

to justify the dismissal, the matter needs to be examined in the light of all the surrounding circumstances. But before

reaching to this conclusion a fair and bona fide domestic enquiry is pre-condition. The compliance of natural justice is

foremost requirement of domestic enquiry which has not been complied in the present reference.

15.

In Deepali Gundu Surwase v/s Kranti Junior Adhyapak Mahavidyalaya (D.Ed.) and others 2013 LAB. I.C.

4249 the Hon’ble Supreme Court has held that;

“ Ordinarily, an employee or workman whose services are terminated and who is desirous of getting back

wages is required to either plead or at least make a statement before the adjudicating authority or the Court of

first instance that he/she was not gainfully employed or was employed on lesser wages. If the employer wants

2362

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

to avoid payment of full back wages, then it has to plead and also lead cogent evidence to prove that the

employee / workman was gainfully employed and was getting wages equal to the wages he / she was drawing

prior to the termination of service. This is so because it is settled law that the burden of proof of the existence of

a particular fact lies on the person who makes a positive averment about its existence. It is always easier to

prove a positive fact than to prove a negative fact. Therefore, once the employee shows that he was not

employed, the onus lies on the employer to specifically plead and prove that the employee was gainfully

employed and was getting the same or substantially similar emoluments.”

16.

The workman has pleaded in Para-6 of his written statement that “the workman is sitting idle without any

employment till date”. In Para-8 of his affidavit the workman has stated that at present he is without any income. The

workman has pleaded that during period of dismissal he was not gainfully employed anywhere else. M/s. Eastern

Coalfields Limited has not rebutted this fact in his written statement nor files any oral or documentary evidence on this

fact.

17.

In Deepali Gundu Surwase v/s Kranti Junior Adhyapak Mahavidyalaya (D.Ed.) and others 2013 LAB. I.C.

4249 the Hon’ble Supreme Court has held that;

“ Cases in which the tribunal finds that the employer has acted in gross violation of the statutory provision or

the principal of natural justice or is guilty of victimizing the employee or workman, then the concerned Court or

Tribunal will be fully justified in directing payment of full back wages. The courts must keep in view that in

cases of wrongful/illegal termination of service the wrongdoer is the employer and the sufferer is the employee/

workman and there is no justification to give premium to the employer of his wrongdoings by relieving him of

the burden to pay to the employee / workman his dues in the form of full back wages.”

18.

The workman, Sri Upendra Bhuiya was dismissed w.e.f. 20.10.2004. The workman in his affidavit dated

10.01.2013 has stated his age 50 years. It indicates that he has not reached up to the age of superannuation. Had he not

been dismissed from service he would have been in service at present. At this age there is no possibility for any

dismissed workman to get alternate job. Therefore in view of law propounded by Hon’ble Apex Court the workman is

entitled for full back wages from date of dismissal i.e. from 20.10.2004 till his reinstatement with continuity in service

and all consequential service benefits.

19.

In view of above discussion the action of management of M/s. Eastern Coalfields in dismissing Sri Upendra

Bhuiya w.e.f. 20.10.2004 is illegal and unjustified. The order of dismissal of management of M/s. Eastern Coalfields

dated 20.10.2004 is hereby set-a-side. The management of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited is directed to reinstate Sri

Upendra Bhuiya in service and is further directed to pay full back wages from date of dismissal i.e. 20.10.2004 till date

of reinstatement with continuity of service. It is further directed that Sri Upendra Bhuiya will get all consequential

service benefits e.g. increment, promotion etc. Sri Upendra Bhuiya will be punished with stoppage of two annual

increments without cumulative effect, for his unauthorized absence. The order will be enforced within Two months after

publication under section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

ORDER

Let an “Award” be and the same is passed as per above discussion. Send the copies of the order to the Govt. of

India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for information and needful. The reference is accordingly disposed of.

PRAMOD KUMAR MISHRA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 25 ebZ] 2016

dk-vk- 1059-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj bZlh,y ds

izcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k@Je

U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 84@2006) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 25-05-2016 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&22012@59@2006&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)]

jktsUæ ¯lg] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 25th May, 2016

S.O. 1059.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 84/2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Lachipur Colliery of

M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 25.05.2016.

[No. L-22012/59/2006-IR (CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938

2363

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL

PRESENT:

Sri Pramod Kumar Mishra, Presiding Officer

REFERENCE NO. 84 OF 2006

PARTIES:

The management of Lachipur Colliery of M/s. E.C.L.

Vs.

Sri Chanda Majhi

REPRESENTATIVES:

For the management

:

Sri P. K. Goswami, Ld. Advocate

For the union (Workman)

:

Sri P. C. Pandey, V.P. (KMC)

INDUSTRY : COAL

STATE : WEST BENGAL

Dated : 12.05.2016

AWARD

In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-section(1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947), Govt. of India through the Ministry of Labour vide its letter NO. L-

22012/59/2006–IR(CM-II) dated 30.10.2006 has been pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by this

Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of Lachipur Colliery under Kajora Area of M/s. ECL in dismissing

Sri Chanda Majhi from services w.e.f. 22.11.1999 is legal and justified? If not, to what relief is the workman

entitled? ”

1.

Having received the Order NO. L-22012/59/2006–IR(CM-II) dated 30.10.2006 of the above said reference

from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference case No. 84 of 2006

was registered on 11.12.2006. Accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through the registered post

to the parties concerned, directing them to appear in the court, on the date fixed and to file their written statements along

with the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance of the said order notices by

the registered post were sent to the parties concerned. Both the parties appeared in the Tribunal, through their

representative.

2.

The workman Sri Chanda Majhi, in brief, has stated in his written statement that he is member of Schedule

Tribe. He was working as Driller bearing U.M. No. 058813. Sri Chanda Majhi due to his acute sickness did not attend

duty from 06.09.1998 to 18.02.1999. He is illiterate person so he did not inform the colliery authority. The workman

neither received any charge sheet from the colliery. Nor notice of enquiry from Enquiry Officer. But he has been

illegally dismissed by the authority on the basis of ex-parte enquiry. The workman is out of employment since the date

of his dismissal. He has no source of livelihood and therefore his family is facing complete starvation. The punishment

of dismissal is unjust and improper. The workman has prayed that the Tribunal may direct the authority to reinstate the

workman by setting aside the order of dismissal. The workman has also prayed that he should be reinstated with back

wages with all consequential benefits.

3.

On other hand the Agent of Lacchipur Colliery under Kajora Area of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited, in brief,

has stated in his written statement that Sri Chanda Majhi Ex-Driller of Lacchipur Colliery under Kajora Area of

M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited was charge sheeted by the management vide charge sheet no. ECL/LAC/P&IR/C-

6/7221 dated 18.02.1999 for his unauthorized absent from duty from 06.09.1998 without any prior permission or

sanctioned leave. The above charge sheet was duly sent to the home address of the workman. But the workman failed to

submit his explanation to the above charge sheet. Therefore domestic enquiry was held into the said charge sheet. The

Enquiry Officer issued due notice of enquiry under registered post with A/D to home address of delinquent workman.

But in spite of due service of notice of enquiry, workman failed to appear before Enquiry Office. Therefore enquiry was

held ex-parte on 29.09.1999. After conclusion of enquiry, Enquiry Officer held the workman guilty for charges framed

under 17(i)(d) and 17(i)(n) of model standing order. Management issued 2nd Show Cause notice vide Ref. No.

KA:PM:C-6:10:3015 dated 27.10.1999 / 01.11.1999 but the workman did not submit any reply to the same. After

perusal of Charge Sheet, Enquiry Proceeding, Enquiry Report and past record of the workman the management was fully

satisfied. The management passed the dismissal order vide Ref. No. KM:PM:C-6:10:3271 dated 19.11.1999. The Agent

of Lacchipur Colliery under Kajora Area of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has denied that workman could not attend

2364

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

his duty from 06.09.1998 to 18.02.1999 due to sickness. The management has denied that the ex-workman did not

receive Charge Sheet or Notice of Enquiry. Management has denied that ex-workman has been illegally dismissed from

service without giving any opportunity to defend himself. Management has denied that ex-workman is out of

employment from date of dismissal or that the punishment of dismissal is just and proper. The workman is not entitled to

any relief.

4.

M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has filed 6 document in his documentary evidence:- (i) Copy of Charge Sheet,

(ii) Copy of Enquiry Proceedings, (iii) Copy of Enquiry Report, (iv) Copy of Appointment of Enquiry Officer, (v) Copy

of 2nd Show Cause Notice, (vi) Copy of Order of Dismissal. M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has not filed any oral

evidence. The workman has filed affidavit in his oral evidence he has been cross-examined by the learned advocate of

M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited.

5.

I have heard Sri P. C. Pandey, learned Union representative on behalf of workman and Sri P. K. Das, learned

Advocate on behalf of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited.

6.

Sri P. C. Pandey argued that for mere absence of 5 months which was under compelling circumstances due to

illness of workman the punishment of dismissal is too harsh. He has argued that workman was never served with Charge

Sheet. He was never informed about the date and place of enquiry. He was never afforded opportunity to defend himself.

There is no compliance of Natural Justice. Sri P. K. Das has argued that the workman is bound by Model Standing

Order. He cannot remain absent for more than 10 days without any prior permission or leave. He has been rightly

punished for unauthorized absence.

7.

It is not disputed that delinquent workman Sri Chanda Majhi was an employee under Lacchipur Colliery under

Kajora Area of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited. It is also not disputed that he has been dismissed from service w.e.f.

22.11.1999. The workman has alleged that he was absent from duty due to his sickness from 06.09.1998 to 12.02.1999.

He has alleged that a domestic enquiry was conducted ex-parte without any service of notice to him. There is denial of

Natural Justice. He has not been afforded opportunity to defend himself. Whereas the Agent of Lacchipur Colliery under

Kajora Area of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has alleged that Sri Chanda Majhi was unauthorized absent for which

enquiry was conducted and notice was served on workman. But the workman did not attend the enquiry proceeding.

Therefore enquiry proceeded ex-parte against the workman.

8.

I have perused the Enquiry Proceeding, Enquiry Report and all relevant papers available on the file of

reference. The workman was issued Charge Sheet. The Enquiry Officer has mentioned that notice of enquiry has been

sent to Sri Chanda Majhi after service of Charge Sheet. But there is no document regarding sending of Notice of

Enquiry. There is no Postal Receipt. There is no evidence on which date the Notice of Enquiry was received by the

delinquent workman. Though Agent of Lacchipur Colliery under Kajora Area of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has

stated in his written statement that registered Acknowledgement Due notice was sent to the home address of the

workman, but neither Acknowledgement Due nor Postal Receipt is filed on record. Only by Postal Receipt or

Acknowledgement Due it can be confirmed that Notice of Enquiry and Charge Sheet has been served. In enquiry

proceeding, the enquiry office had adjourned the proceeding for absence of Sri Chanda Majhi on enquiry date. But it has

never been mentioned or observed that the Notice of Enquiry or service of Charge Sheet was really received by the

delinquent workman Sri Chanda Majhi. Though the departmental enquiry proceeded ex-parte against the delinquent

workman. But before proceeding ex-pate the Enquiry Officer is duty bound to ensure that before proceeding Notice of

Enquiry was actually served. The enquiry officer is an independent person. He is supposed to conduct domestic enquiry

impartially in fare and independent manner. The burden to establish and prove the charge against the delinquent

workman is on the employer. If the employer prove the misconduct of employee by fair and valid domestic enquiry then

burden shifts to employee to prove his innocence.

9.

The Hon’ble Allahabad High Court in Divisional Railway Manager, Northern Railway, Lucknow and others v/s

Salig Ram Mandal, 2014 (140) FLR 694 has held that;

“That enquiry officer is an independent person and is not a brief holder of the department of a quasi judicial

authority. He has to follow the procedure and observe the principles of evidence for proving the documents

submitted by the department in enquiry against the employee. The Hon’ble Allahabad High Court has held that

departmental proceeding is like proceeding like court. Burden of proof lies on the department which can only

be proved by collecting evidence and proving of the documentary evidence by oral evidence.”

10.

After conclusion of enquiry on receipt of Enquiry Report the delinquent workman ought to have been supplied

copy of Enquiry Report and all connected papers relied on by the Enquiry Officer. But from perusal of 2nd Show Cause

Notice it is apparent that delinquent workman was supplied with only finding of Enquiry Officer. Sri Chanda Majhi, the

delinquent workman was never supplied with full and complete copy of proceeding of Domestic Enquiry. At the cost of

repetition it is relevant to mention the delinquent workman was absent during enquiry proceeding. Therefore the

statement of witness and the report of the department ought to have been supplied to the delinquent workman.

11.

Hon’ble Supreme Court in Uttaranchal and others v/s Sri Kharak Singh, 2008 (118) FLR, 1112 has held that;

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938

2365

“ On receipt of the Enquiry Report, before proceeding further, it is incumbent on the part of the disciplinary /

punishing authority to supply a copy of the enquiry report and all connected materials relied on by the Enquiry

Officer to enable him to officer his views, if any.”

12.

From the olden time, the labour class has always been subjected to subjugation by the capital class. Being a

labour and poor thereof used to be considered as a curse on human being. As society developed and as we entered into

the arena of twentieth century, deep voice of protection of labour’s right from illegitimate and uncontrolled act was

raised. Considering the need of the hour, government enacted certain labour legislation and the objects of those

legislation was to provide harmonize and fear free environment for working labours and employees. However such laws

have not been enacted to provide complete immunity to labours and they cannot shield themselves behind the curtain for

their misconduct. So as to balance both parties and situation, the government has incorporated certain provision relating

to keep check and balance on the activities of the employees and employer. There is no specific procedure prescribed in

Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 and other rules made under therein, which should be complied with before inflicting

disciplinary punishment upon and industrial employee. However while the disciplinary proceeding is going on against

an employee, it is a mandatory and not a directory duty upon the employer to give a chance of hearing to such employee.

The Employer / Enquiry Officer is duty bound to ensure that all the requirement of Principle of Natural Justice has been

followed and case should be heard in a judicial spirit and in accordance with Principle of Substantial Justice. Article

14,15,19,21 and 23 of Constitution of India as well as Directive Principle of State Policy provide a better and strong

framework for the protection of interest of the labour class. Employer has to keep in mind that while disciplinary

proceeding is going on against an employee, it should not violate any sacred provisions of the Constitution of India.

13.

By introduction of section 11(A) to the industrial Dispute Act, The Industrial Tribunals are vested with the

power to decide the justification of the decision of the employers. Thus, when it is found that the domestic enquiry is not

held properly, it will stand vitiated and the Industrial Tribunal would set-a-side the order of punishment by giving

appropriate relief including that of lesser punishment or even no punishment resulting in reinstatement 0f the concerned

workman. For disciplinary action, a domestic enquiry occupies an important position under labour law. Thus, the

enquiries are required to be held with utmost regard to the Principle of Natural Justice. Without holding a valid enquiry

or conducting a domestic enquiry in utter violation of Principle of Natural Justice and on the basic of such enquiry the

dismissal of workman for unauthorized absence of near about 5 months is quite socking and disproportionate.

14.

Sri Chanda Majhi the delinquent workman has stated in Para-7 of his written statement that he is out of

employment since the date of dismissal and he being a poor man is facing a complete starvation along with his family

members without having any source of livelihood. The workman has stated on oath in Para-8 of his affidavit that he is

out of employment from date of dismissal and he is without any source of livelihood.

15.

In Deepali Gundu Surwase v/s Kranti Junior Adhyapak Mahavidyalaya (D.Ed.) and others 2013 LAB. I.C.

4249 the Hon’ble Supreme Court has held that;

“ Ordinarily, an employee or workman whose services are terminated and who is desirous of getting back

wages is required to either plead or at least make a statement before the adjudicating authority or the Court of

first instance that he / she was not gainfully employed or was employed on lesser wages. If the employer wants

to avoid payment of full back wages, then it has to plead and also lead cogent evidence to prove that the

employee / workman was gainfully employed and was getting wages equal to the wages he / she was drawing

prior to the termination of service. This is so because it is settled law that the burden of proof of the existence of

a particular fact lies on the person who makes a positive averment about its existence. It is always easier to

prove a positive fact than to prove a negative fact. Therefore, once the employee shows that he was not

employed, the onus lies on the employer to specifically plead and prove that the employee was gainfully

employed and was getting the same or substantially similar emoluments.

Cases in which the tribunal finds that the employer has acted in gross violation of the statutory provision or the

principal of natural justice or is guilty of victimizing the employee or workman, then the concerned Court or

Tribunal will be fully justified in directing payment of full back wages. The courts must keep in view that in

cases of wrongful / illegal termination of service the wrongdoer is the employer and the sufferer is the

employee / workman and there is no justification to give premium to the employer of his wrongdoings by

relieving him of the burden to pay to the employee / workman his dues in the form of full back wages.”

16.

In view of law propounded by Hon’ble Apex Court, the workman is entitled for full back wages from the date

of dismissal till his reinstatement in service. But as per service excerpt his year of birth is 1951. At present his age is

near about 65 years. He has reached rather crossed the age of superannuation therefore he cannot be reinstated. The

workman has not filed any medical certificate regarding his sickness for the period of absence on the file of reference.

Therefore there is no basis to accept that he was absent from duty due to his sickness.

17.

In view of discussion above, the action of management of Lacchipur Colliery under Kajora Area of

M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited in dismissing Sri Chanda Majhi from services w.e.f. 22.11.99 is illegal and unjustified.

I set-a-side the order of dismissal of Sri Chanda Majhi dated 22.11.99. Since he has reached the age of superannuation

M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited is directed to award full back wages from the date of dismissal i.e. 22.11.99 till the date

2366

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

of retirement of Sri Chanda Majhi with all consequential service benefits. The delinquent workman will be imposed the

punishment of stoppage of two annual increment with cumulative effect. The order will be enforced within Two months

after publication under section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

ORDER

Let an “Award” be and the same is passed as per above discussion. Send the copies of the order to the Govt. of

India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for information and needful. The reference is accordingly disposed of.

PRAMOD KUMAR MISHRA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 25 ebZ] 2016

dk-vk- 1060-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj chch,ech

ds izcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- 1] paMhx<+ ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 90@2012) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 25-05-2016 dks

izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&23012@01@2012&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)]

jktsUæ ¯lg] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 25th May, 2016

S.O. 1060.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 90/2012) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court No. 1, Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Beas

Construction Board (BBMB), Sector-19B and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 25.05.2016.

[No. L-23012/01/2012-IR (CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI SURENDRA PRAKASH SINGH, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVT.

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM-LABOUR COURT-I, CHANDIGARH

Case No. ID No 90 of 2012

Reference no. L-23012/1/2012/IR(CM-II) dated 30.01.2013 and corrigendum dated 31.5.2013

Shri Basant Singh son of Shri Ram Saran,

Village Kot, P.O.Chunhan, Tehsil Sadar,

District Mandi(HP)

…Workman.

Versus

1.

The General Manager,

Beas Construction Board (BBMB),

Sector-19B, Chandigarh

2.

Chairman BBMB, Sector 19B,

Chandigarh

3.

Chief Engineer, BSL Project,

Sundernagar, District Mandi.(HP)

…Respondent

Appearances :

For the Workman

:

Shri R.K.Singh.

For the Management

:

Shri Ravinder Singh Rana.

AWARD

Passed on : 06-05-2016

Government of India Ministry of Labour vide notification No. L-23012/1/2012/IR (CM-II) dated 30.01.2013

and corrigendum dated 31.5.2013, the Central Govt. has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938

2367

“Whether the action of the BBMB in denying re-employment to Shri Basant Singh son of Shri Ram Saran, a

retrenchee of BCB is legally just and valid? If not, to what relief Shri Basant Singh is entitled for and from

which date?”

2.

Brief facts of the case according to the workman are that he was appointed by the Beas Construction Board

after trade test as charge man special in work charged capacity and joined as such on 16.4.1964 and he was promoted as

Asstt. Foreman special in 1972 and he was retrenched from service on 20.4.1984. It is pleaded by the workman that

though he had worked for 19 years 5 months and 4 days with the BCB but he was paid retrenchment compensation for

19 years and as per rules he is entitled for the retrenchment compensation for 20 years and in view of the above his

retrenchment is illegal, void and bad in law for non payment of full compensation as mentioned above. It is further

pleaded by the workman that the post of foreman special and assistant foreman special was required by the Chief

engineer BBMB Sundernagar but the workman was not offered re-employment despite senior most workman which is

against the spirit of Award No.2C. It is also pleaded that one Shri Vrinder Chargeman had been given re-employment as

telephone operator. It is also pleaded by the workman that earlier he approached Labour Court Dharamshala and his

reference was dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The workman was given liberty by the Hon’ble High Court in CWP

No. 708/2007 to approach the Central Govt. and delay in raising the dispute shall not be counted. The workman also

pleaded that management of BBMB had filled the post on which the workman was holding by according promotion

from the lower categories which is against the spirit of Section 25H. It is prayed that action of the management in non

providing employment to the workman is against the provisions of the ID Act and prayed for re-employment from back

date with pension, back wages and all benefits.

3.

The management filed reply to the claim statement. Preliminary objection has been taken that the workman is

stopped by his own act and conduct to raise the present dispute in view of the fact that the workman was given liberty to

raise the dispute within four weeks by the order dated 4.6.2010 of the Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh but the

workman has raised the present dispute in 2012 and as such the workman is debarred from raising the dispute at a

belated stage of about two years. It is further pleaded that the workman is in litigation with the management since 1987

and he never raised the issue that the workman was paid less retrenchment compensation in CWP 138/87 and also did

not raise this issue before the Labour Court Dharamshala and even in CWP 708/2007; the workman never raised this

issue. On merits it is pleaded that the workman was retrenched from service by the BCB on 20.4.1984 on the

completion/part completion of the works strictly in accordance with the provisions of the ID Act 1947and the workman

was paid his terminal dues as per law and this retrenchment of the employees of BCB was upheld by the Hon’ble

Supreme Court in the case of Jaswant Singh Vs. Union of India reported in AIR 1980 SC 115. The management further

pleaded that as per directions in reference NO. 2C which was enforceable only for six months, the work charged

employee were taken over in BBMB from BCB bit as the petitioner was not senior in the category of Assistant foreman

special( automobile) and the creation of additional post in that category was denied, therefore, the workman could not be

taken over in the BBMB as at best the workman can claim his right only in his category, trade and seniority and not in

others. Thus it is prayed by the management that as the workman is not entitled for any claim, the reference deserves to

be rejected.

4.

In evidence, the workman filed his affidavit. In rebuttal the management also filed the affidavit of Shri Umesh

Nayak Superintendent( Sr. Executive Engineer) Procurement, Store and Disposal Division BBMB Sunder Nagar

alongwith documents Ex. M2 to M6. Both the witnesses of the parties were cross-examined.

5.

I have heard the parties, gone through the evidence and record.

6.

During arguments it is submitted by the learned representative of the workman that at the time of retrenchment

in the year 1984, the workman was paid less retrenchment compensation as he was paid only for 19 years of service

whereas he was entitled for 20 years of service as he had served19 years five months4 days before retrenchment. As the

retrenchment compensation was paid less, therefore, the retrenchment is bad in law. In this regard, Section 25 F (b) of

the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 is reproduced below:

“(b) The workman has been paid, at the time of retrenchment, compensation which shall be equivalent to fifteen

days’ average pay (for every completed year of continuous service) or any part thereof in excess of six months”

7.

As per claim statement of the workman, he has put in 19 years 5 months 4 days of continuous service and

admittedly the workman was paid retrenchment compensation for 19 years of services which is as per the mandate of the

above provisions of the I.D.Act. During cross examination in this Tribunal, the workman also admitted that he was paid

all his terminal benefits. Thus, workman was adequately paid on account of retrenchment compensation.

8.

Learned representative of the workman submitted during arguments that one Vrinder chargeman was given

reemployment by the BBMB as Telephone Operator and workman was left out and he was not provided re employment

and this action of the management is illegal and arbitrary. Learned representative of the management submitted that as

per directions in reference no.2C of 1971 workcharged employees were taken over in BBMB from the B.C.B. The

2368

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

workman was not taken as there was no vacancy in his cadre and no junior to the workman was given re employment.

From the perusal of the evidence, during cross examination it is admitted by the workman that “it is correct that my

seniority number was found in the category of Assistant Foreman Special. It is correct that no person junior to me was

offered employment by the BBMB. Vrinder Kumar was engaged as Telephone Operator”. Thus, it is revealed that none

of the junior to the workman was appointed in the BBMB in his cadre. The above Vrinder was given re employment by

the BBMB as Telephone Operator who was in the category of chargeman.

9.

From the above, it is clear that the workman was rightly paid the retrenchment compensation at the time of his

retrenchment in the year 1984 and none of the junior to the workman was given re employment by the BBMB. It is also

pertinent to mention here that vide letter dated 10-06-1984, Chief Engineer, BSL Project Sundernagar sent a proposal to

Secretary BBMB Chandigarh for creation of additional posts of foreman special, assistant foreman special in the trade of

automobile but this proposal was rejected by the higher authorities. Thus, no post in the trade of assistant foreman

special in the trade of automobile was available to be offered for re employment to the workman. It is pertinent to

mention that the workman is presently aged about 79 years.

10.

In view of the discussion made above, the action of the management of the BBMB in denying re-employment

to Shri Basant Singh son of Shri Ram Saran, a retrenchee of BCB is legal, just and valid and the workman is not entitled

to any relief.

11. Reference is answered accordingly. Central Govt. be informed. Soft copy as well as hard copy be sent to the

Central Govt. for publication.

Chandigarh

06.05.2016

S. P. SINGH, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 25 ebZ] 2016

dk-vk- 1061-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj ,iQlhvkbZ

ds izcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 89@2007) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 25-05-2016 dks izkIr

gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&22012@175@2007&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)]

jktsUæ ¯lg] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 25th May, 2016

S.O. 1061.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 89/2007) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Food Corporation or

India and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 25.05.2016.

[No. L-22012/175/2007-IR (CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/R/89/07

Ashwani Shukla,

Ashish Shukla,

Bindu Shukla &

Anshu Shukla, LRs of

Shri Rajendra Kumar Shukla,

S/o Late Shri S.N.Shukla, Srinivas,

Aamapara, Behind Vivekanand Aashram,

Raipur (CG)

…Workman

Versus

Distt. Manager, FCI,

Distt. Office, Jabalpur.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938

2369

Sr.Regional Manager,

FCI, Regional Office, Chetak Bldg,.

Bhopal

Zonal Officer, FCI,

Dinsha Wacha Road, Church Gate, Mumbai

District Manager, FCI,

District office, Raipur.

Managing Director, FCI,

Head Office, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg,

New Delhi.

…Management

AWARD

Passed on this 7th day of April 2016

1.

As per letter dated 7-9-07 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is

received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.

L-22012/175/2007-IR(CM-II). The dispute under reference relates to:

“Whether the action of the management of Food Corporation of India in terminating the services of Shri

Rajendra Kumar Shukla w.e.f. 9-12-85 is legal and justified? If not, to what relief is the workmen entitled?”

2.

After receiving reference, notices were issued to the parties. Ist party workman submitted statement of claim at

page 2/1 to 2/6. Case of workman is that on 15-11-66, he was transferred to FCI on post of Asstt. Grade III. He was

promoted to the post of Asstt. Grade II on 15-12-66. In the year 1971, he was promoted as Assistant Grade I. his service

record was unblemished. On 25-2-84, workman was served with chargesheet alleging that workman while working at

Railway Goods shed Raipur has issued stocks directly from Raipur Railway goods shed to Raipur Flour Mills on 10-5-

83 without any authority. The stocks were issued without proper weighment and has recorded under weighment of the

stocks. That workman Shri R.K.Shukla has given under benefit of excess weight to the Raipur Flour Mills with ulterior

motive in violation of Regulation No. 31 & 32 of the FCI Staff Regulations 1971. He was suspended on 19-8-83 and

his headquarter was fixed Jabalpur. MP under 2nd party No.5. On 1-6-84, chargesheet was altered. Charge against Shri

R.R.Nirmalkar Asstt. Grade III, FCI was altered. Chargesheet was corrected by substituting the word Railway Goods

Shed, Bhatapara in place of Railway Goods Shed, Raipur. Workman was removed from service as per order dated 9-12-

85. Workman preferred appeal challenging the order of his removal from service. The appeal was rejected without

applying any mind and without any proper reasons. Workman further submits that DE was conducted in short manner

without giving reasonable opportunity to him. Enquiry was conducted in violation of principles of natural justice. That

he was not supplied documents listed with chargesheet. List of witnesses was also not supplied to him. He suffered

injustice in his defence. Workman reiterates that enquiry conducted against him is illegal. He was not permitted to cross

examine witnesses of management who were examined behind his back.

3. Ist party further submits that findings of Enquiry Officer are perverse and deserves to be quashed. That he has

not committed any misconduct for which chargesheet was issued to him. Order of removal from service dated 9-12-85 is

illegal and deserves to be quashed. Workman has further pleaded about civil suit filed by him on advice of his counsel

was decreed on 20-4-92. Said judgment and decree was set aside by Court holding that Civil Court has no jurisdiction to

decide service matter of FCI. Said judgment was challenged by workman before Chhattisgarh High Court. Hon’ble High

Court upheld findings in the appeal that FCI was industry and claim of workman was under industrial dispute,

workman can approach appropriate forum. Consequently the delay in raising dispute is caused. Workman reiterates that

findings of Enquiry Officer are illegal. Order of removal is illegal. On such grounds, workman prays for his

reinstatement and alternately compensation Rs. 25 Lakhs in lieu of reinstatement.

4. 2nd party filed Written Statement at Page 9/1 to 9/13 opposing claim of workman. 2nd party submits that FCI is

statutory corporation established under FCI Corporation Act 1964. That FCI deals with imports, procurement, storage

and distribution of food grains throughout the country. It is bound to act in accordance with the directions issued by

Central Government. The employees of FCI are covered by FCI Regulations of 1971. Workman was appointed in the

Food and Civil supplies deptt. Of Government of India. He was transferred to FCI on 15-11-66. As Asstt. Grade III and

then on 15-12-66, he was promoted to the post of Asstt. Grade II. In 1971, he was promoted to Asstt. Grade I. during

1983, workman was posted at Bhatapara depot of FCI. In May 1983, he issued 6 truck wheat against RO No. 9139

dated 7-5-83 directly from Railway Goods Shed on 10-5-83 to M/s Raipur Flour Mills without any authority and proper

weighment. The details of quantity of wheat supplied in all those six trucks are shown in para 5 of the Written

Statement. That on routine check, officers of FCI found that no weight check memo was prepared for the said issues. It

was also found that the stocks issued without weighment giving undue benefit to parties by issuing excess wheat. The

2370

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

owner of Truck No. CPT/2823 got said truck weighed at Ashok Dharamkanta Raipur and found 138.30 quintals as

against the quantity issued vide Truck Chit No. 4404 dated 10-5-83 which was excess of about 11.80 quintals for which

the transporter claimed transportation charges on whole quantity of weight. That the concerned party was issued with

C & D category of wheat stocks already available in godowns despite delivery was given from Railway Goods Shed

directly with his ulterior motive. That two trucks No. MPS/9649 and MBR/8531 shown loaded with 100 bags wheat

each vide truck Chit No.44-1 & 4402 dated 10-5-83 were actually loaded with 140 bags to 150 bags as confirmed by

railway goods shed hammals. No weight check memo was prepared by Ist party workman. Less number of bags were

shown to have been loaded with ulterior motive and gave undue benefit to M/S Raipur Flour Mills. That 575 MT

gunnies were sent to railway goods shed for replacement of cut and torn bags and for filling loose palla against which

the workman showed receipt of 352 gunnies and 105 gunnies utilized for filling palla. There was shortage of 118

gunnies. Bags were loaded in cases excess on the aforesaid two trucks. The investigation was handed over to one

Assistant Manager who submitted his report. Workman was suspended on 19-7-83. Chargesheet was served on workman

on 25-2-84, the articles of charges statement of implication of misconduct, list of witnesses, documents were supplied to

workman. The chargesheet was issued for violation of Regulation 31, 32, 50, 58 of FCI Staff Regulation 1971.

Workman had approached Disciplinary Authority for revocation of his suspension. His suspension was evoked as per

order dated 5-5-84. Workman was directed to work at Jabalpur.

5.

Shri K.K.Krishnan was appointed as Enquiry Officer and Shri P.M.Nair, Assistant Manager as Presenting

Officer. Enquiry was conducted against workman after correcting the discripancies in chargesheet instead of mentioning

Railway goods Shed, Bhatapara, it was mentioned as Railway Goods Shed, Raipur. Corrigendum was issued on 12-6-84.

Enquiry was conducted on various dates. Workman was represented by defence Assistant Kailash Sahay. Enquiry

Officer submitted his report on 21-11-85 holding charges against workman are proved. The Disciplinary Authority after

considering report of Enquiry Officer imposed penalty of removal from service of workman on 9-12-1985. The appeal

preferred by workman was rejected on 16-12-86. Written Statement is further devoted about the Civil Suit filed by

workman. By looking to the judgment and the order was setaside by 4th Additional District Judge Raipur in 28-A/93. In

2nd appeal No. 534/93, the judgment setting aside said order was upheld holding that claim of workman amounts to

dispute under ID Act, civil court has no jurisdiction. 2nd party submits that enquiry is properly conducted. Punishment

of removal imposed against workman is illegal. Reference be answered in favour of management.

6.

As per order dated 5-12-2014, enquiry conducted against workman is found proper and legal.

7.

Considering pleadings on record and order on enquiry, the points which arise for my consideration and

determination are as under. My findings are recorded against each of them for the reasons as below:-

(i) Whether the misconduct alleged against

workman is proved from evidence in Enquiry

proceedings?

In Affirmative

(ii) Whether the punishment of dismissal imposed

against workman is proper and legal?

In Affirmative

(ii) If not, what relief the workman is entitled to?”

Workman is not entitled to any relief.

REASONS

8.

Enquiry conducted against workman is found proper and legal vide order dated 5-12-2014. Whether charges

alleged against workman are proved needs to be proved considering evidence in Enquiry Proceedings. Learned counsel

for workman Shri R.K.Soni during course of argument submits that chargesheet was issued to workman alleging

misconduct that goods were issued without checking on basis of complaint, the truck was seen overloaded stock was not

checked. Punchnama was not done. Learned counsel further submits that transportation bill was not produced. Charge

was handed over to workman. Therefore issuing weight cannot be said unauthorized. The weighment receipt was not

produced only on complaint. Any documents were not verified w.r.t. overloading. Gage pass was not produced. Learned

counsel also referred to judgment by Civil Court, appeal and 2nd appeal. The incident was not reported to police., charge

against Shri Nirmalkar was dropped. The witness were not examined. Claim of workman was decreed by Civil Court

holding charges against workman as not proved. All the witnesses in enquiry had admitted their signature on the

complaint.

9.

Workman died during pendency of reference. LRs are brought on record. Monetary benefits be allowed to LRs.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938

2371

10.

Shri S.Pandey for management submitted written notes of argument. Learned counsel further explained the

workman was suspended. List of witnesses, list of documents were enclosed along with memo of articles of charges.

Suspension was revoked on 5-5-84. Management’s witnesses were cross-examined. Enquiry Proceeding was submitted.

The appeal preferred by workman was rejected. The litigation by workman in Civil Court Ist appeal and 2nd appeal is not

relevant for deciding the controversy between parties as civil court has no jurisdiction decide under Section 10 of ID

Act and Hon’ble High Court has upheld the judgment of 4th Additional District Judge setting aside the judgment and

decree passed by Civil Judge.

11.

Whether charges alleged against workman are proved needs to be decided considering evidence in Enquiry

Proceedings itself. Exhibit M-8 is memo of charges issued to workman on 25-2-84. The charges alleged against

workman pertains to while workman was working at Railway Goods Shed on 10-5-83 without authority issued stocks

without proper weighment and recorded under weighment of stock. Workman had given undue benefit of excess weight

with ulterior motive violating Article 31,32 of FCI Regulation Act, 1971. Preliminary Enquiry Report is produced at

Page 9/30. Statement of witness Shri D.B.Markam is on the point that he had admitted his signature on complaint

collectively made by Class IV employees. In his cross-examination, witness says that in May 83, Jagdev Singh was

Assistant Manager. Shri R.K.Shukla was Technical Asstt. Of Bhatapara in May 83. No gunnies were sent from State

godown to Shri R.K.Shukla and RR Nirmalkar on 10-5-83. In reply to Q.6, witness says it was duty of workman in case

of suspect excess loading in a particular truck is noticed as compared to the Truck Chit, so we brought to the knowledge

of the superior and police. Evidence of witness Shri Dhru Stitcher at Page 9/37 is only w.r.t. that he signed the

complaint, he has no personal knowledge. Management’s witness Shri K.L.Patel in his evidence says that Exhibit P-6

shown to him is letter addressed to Asstt. Manager, FCI, Bhatapara dated 25-6-83 is signed by him. The letter relates to

misappropriation of wheat at Railway Goods Shed Bhatapara. On 10-5-83, he was on duty at Railway Goods Shed from

6 AM to 4 PM. He performed double duty at Bhatapara. He reached godown at 4.30 PM he was not aware about loading

of truck with wheat for Raipur Flour Mills by Shri Ratan Babu. He found gate pass with Ratan. He had some doubt

about excess quantity loaded in truck and mentioned in the letter to take appropriate action by higher authorities. He

confirmed said letter Exhibit P-5. In his further evidence, above management’s witnesses says out of wheat stocks being

dispatched from Railhead to CWCV godown Bhatapara, Shri Suklaji has sent 5 trucks of wheat to four mills directly. It

created some doubts to all workmen in these trucks excess quantity of wheat was dispatched. Ratan has dispatched

those trucks to Raipur Flour mills. Management’s witness Shri R.K.Shukla admitted his signatures on Exhibit P-4

addressed to AG-I, FCI, Bhatapara. He identified signature of Shri R.K.Shukla dated 13-5-83. His evidence is further

devoted on the point that P-2 shown to him is release order No. 9139 dated 7-5-83 addressed to M/S Raipur Flour Mill,

Raipur detailing C & D wheat of 690 quintals to be released to them by Asstt. Manager, FCI, Bhatapara. It is signed by

Shri Gurucharan Singh dated 7-5-83. As seen from release order, delivery of stock is to be completed before 10-5-83.

In his cross-examination, witness says priority list was prepared as per condition of stock categorization. In reply to Q.4,

witness says it was supplied before issuing stock to D/I Bhatapara. In reply to Q.5, witness says Narayan was D/I,

Bhatapara. That as incharge of FCI hired godown on 10-5-83 Sjhri R.K.Shukla was working and Shri NMarayan had

handed over the charge to Shri R.K.Shukla of hired godown. Ex.P-4 doesnot indicate that Shri R.K.Shukla refused to

take note of stocks from his godown. In reply to Q.9, witness says party approached with RO to Shri Narayan and he

was unaware whether Shri R.K.Shukla has refused to issue C&D category stock 44 MTs lying in State hired godown.

On 10-5-83, he was working in Bhatapara office. In reply to Q.13, witness did not remember circumstances in which

Exhibit P-4 was written.

12.

Management’s witness Shri Verma at Page 9/47 says before signing complaint P-4 regarding misappropriation

at Bhatapara office. He identified his signature on complaint Sl.No.11. He readover the complaint and signedover it. He

was not on dugty at Railway Good Shed on 12-5-83. Shri R.K.Shukla was in the office during the period but he had not

taken over charge during that period. Management’s witness Shri B.P.Mishra has given detailed evidence that

stockloaded by Trick No. 2823 transported from Bhatapara goods Shed to Raipur Flour Mill Raipur was on average

weight and not weighed. The driver of the truck told that weight seems to be more and accordingly remedy was taken

by Shri Ashokdharan Kanta. As per this weighment, 12 to 14 quintals weight was seen in excess and he got the

transportation charges as per the actual weight. That Shri Swran Sahu was driver of the truck No. CPT 2823. That

Bhatiya transport engaged the truck contractor of FCI on 10-5-83. In reply to Q.4, above witness of management

reite3rates that weight was shown on average, it is not written in the document, truck was dispatched without

weighment. In reply to Q.5, above witness says that on basis of writing complaint about excess weight and excess

payment as per statement of other Truck Driver, he had not seen him receiving excess payment in his presence. In reply

to Q.6, he says that as insisted by legal representative of workman, he had given in writing. He handed over cheque to

some official of Bhatapara depot.Evidence of witness D.W.Narayan shows that he confirmed entries reflected in log

book P-9. He did not find place at Page 16 of Exhibit B-I. as per entry P-9 the gunnies were sent to Railway godown

shed for utilization but name of recipient is not recorded. In reply to Q.3, witness says 100 % weighment was not

conducted at Railway Goods Shed Bhatapara on 10-5-83. When this witness was referred to Page 60 of Exhibit D-2, he

confirmed as per remarks made therein how many empty gunnies were received back from Railway Goods Shed out of

2372

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

575 gunnies sent to the Railway Goods Shed from State Godown. Out of 575 gunnies, 48 gunnies were received back,

105 were utilized for palla filling, 304 gunnies unser were received after replacement and 118 were not received back

neither served nor as unserved. His evidence in further cross examination shows that Shri R.K.Shukla told for C&D

category wheat was requested by the Asstt. Manager Bhatapara only to liquidate the old stock of C&D category lying in

the depot. Shri shukla said that he will reply for that. In reply to Q.5, witness says he did not know who was incharge

but he had seen the routine papers were signed sometimes by Shri R.K.Shukla AG I(D) and sometimes by Shri

R.K.Shukla TA Gr.I, some were signed by him also. He had not seen any official order.

13.

Evidence of witnesses is discussed by Enquiry Officer in his report. The scope of judicial review is limited. The

evidence of witnesses in Enquiry Proceedings cannot be re-appreciated. The evidence considered by Enquiry Officer in

his report is supported. It cannot be said that Enquiry Report submitted by Enquiry Officer in the enquiry and it cannot

be said that the finding of Enquiry Officer are perverse. For above reasons, I record my finding in Point No.1 in

Affirmative.

14.

Point No.2- In view of my finding in Point No.1 charges alleged against workman are proved from evidence in

Enquiry Proceedings, question remains for decision whether punishment of removal imposed against workman is proper

and justified. The charges proved against workman from evidence in Enquiry Proceedings pertains to issuing wheat

without weighing, excessive stocks were loaded in the trucks, about 11-14 quintals excess in all those six trucks. The

proved charges against workman are very serious. Therefore punishment of removal from service of workman cannot be

said excessive or disproportionate. So far as written notes of argument submitted on behalf of workman is mostly

devoted about enquiry against workman was not properly conducted. Issue is already answered in Affirmative holding

that enquiry is legal. Notes of arguments submitted doesnot deal with evidence of management’s witnesses. Similar

notes of argument submitted by counsel for 2nd party. The details of evidence how the charges are proved from evidence

in Enquiry Proceedings are not mentioned. Considering charge proved against workman is of serious nature, no

interference in punishment of removal of workman is called for. For above reasons, I record my finding in Point No.2 in

Affirmative.

15.

In the result, award is passed as under:-

(1)

The action of the management is proper and legal.

(2)

Workman is not entitled to any relief.

R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 25 ebZ] 2016

dk-vk- 1062-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj lkmFkuZ ,;j

dekaM ds izcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] ,ukZdqye ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 45@2013) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 25-05-2016 dks

izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&42025@03@2016&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)]

ih- ds- os.kqxksiky] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 25th May, 2016

S.O. 1062.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (ID No. 45/2013) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Ernakulam now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of the Southern Air Command and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on

25.05.2016.

[No. L-42025/03/2016-IR (DU)]

P. K. VENUGOPAL, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

ERNAKULAM

Present: Shri. K. Sasidharan, B.Sc., LLB, Presiding Officer

(Friday the 29th day of April, 2016/09th Vaisakha, 1938)

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938

2373

ID 45/2013

Workman

:

Smt. S. Nirmala Devi,

Kamala Vilasam,

T.C. 34/329, Beach P. O.,

Thiruvananthapuram.

By Adv. Shri Biju Balakrishnan

Managements

:

1. The Commanding Officer,

Wing Commander Head Quarters,

Southern Air Command,

Air Force Station,

Thiruvananthapuram.

2. The Chief Administrative Officer (Wing Commander),

Air Force Station, Beach P.O.,

Thiruvananthapuram.

By Adv. Shri Jamaludheen. K. M.

This case coming up for final hearing on 22.04.2016 and this Tribunal-cum-Labour Court on 29.04.2016 passed

the following:

AWARD

This is an application filed by the workman under Section 2A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

2.

The contentions of the workman as drawn out from the application, in brief are as follows:

As per the appointment order No.17FBSU/358/2/Org., dated 04.08.1992 the workman was employed as Ayah

under the management from the year 1992. She was treated as a conservancy worker in the medical inspection room of

the management. She is a workman as defined under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. There was an

attempt on the part of the management to terminate her services. Therefore the workman along with three other

similarly situated persons filed O.A. No.306/1998 before the Hon’ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Ernakulam. That

OA was disposed of as per order dated 18.11.1999 directing the management not to terminate her services if work is

available and if persons with lesser length of service are retained. Subsequently there was an attempt on the part of the

management to disengage the workman from her duties. Therefore she filed OA No.293/2002 before the Hon’ble

Central Administrative Tribunal. The Hon’ble Central Administrative Tribunal declined to accept the request of the

workman against which she preferred WP(C) No.26075/2005 before the Hon’ble High Court of Kerala. As per the

judgment dated 24.06.2008 the Hon’ble High Court of Kerala directed the management to continue the engagement of

the workman with further observation that it will not be reasonable for the management to decline her employment on

daily wage basis. Subsequently the management allowed the workman to continue as a casual labourer.

3.

The workman was compelled to accept the engagement as a casual labourer under the management due to her

pathetic situation. Subsequently the management appointed another person overlooking the claim of the workman and

ignoring the directions of Hon’ble High Court of Kerala. As per Rule 15 of the Special Rules for Pat Time Contingent

Service, the workman is entitled to continue in service till she attains the age of seventy years. Even though the

workman submitted representation before the first management and before the Hon’ble Minister of Defence,

Government of India no positive steps were taken to provide employment to the workman. Therefore she approached

Conciliation Officer & Assistant Labour Commissioner(Central), Trivandrum with a request to resolve the dispute

through negotiation. The Conciliation Officer could not resolve the dispute. Hence he issued a certificate enabling

the workman to pursue her remedy before this Tribunal. Therefore the workman has requested to set aside the actions

taken by the management and to direct them to reengage her with all benefits including back wages.

4.

The contentions in the written statement filed by the management in brief are as follows:

The management has denied all the averments in the application except those that are specifically admitted.

This tribunal has no jurisdiction to consider the claim put forward by the workman in view of the policy decision of the

Union of India. Before approaching this Tribunal the workman filed application before the Hon’ble Central

Administrative Tribunal on two occasions and Writ Petition before the Hon’ble High Court of Kerala. The management

has called upon the workman to prove that she will come under the purview of “workman” as defined under Section 2(s)

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Even as per the admission of the workman she was engaged as a part time daily

wage employee in the medical inspection room attached to the office of the Commanding Officer, Thiruvananthapuram.

The wages due to her is paid from and out of the Regimental funds, which is contributed by Air Warriors of the base

2374

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

station for their welfare activities. The services of the workman cannot be undertaken through Government Funds as it

is not authorized.

5.

As per the judgment in WP(C) No.26075/2005 dated 24.06.2008 the Hon’ble High Court of Kerala has

observed that the workman has no ground to claim for regularization in service. It was further observed that the service

of the workman was on daily wage basis and further directed that as and when vacancy arises on temporary basis, to

employ her.

6.

In pursuance of the observations in the judgment of the Hon’ble High Court of Kerala the management offered

the job of casual labourer on daily wage basis to the workman in the year 2008. The workman did not accept the same.

Again as per letter dated 18.06.2009 she was offered employment, which she accepted and continued the work as a daily

wage casual labourer in broken periods till March, 2011.

7.

From April, 2011 the base station of the management is not authorized to hire casual labourers directly. The

Government of India advised the management to outsource the conservancy/casual labour services by Integrated

Financial Advisor to Government of India due to change in the administration policy by the Union of India. As per the

decision of the Government of India such work should be given to ex-servicemen. The claim of the workman is not

maintainable either in law or on facts. The management has requested to uphold her contentions and disallow the claim

of the workman.

8.

The workman filed replication reiterating the contentions in the claim application filed by her.

9.

As per order in IA No.137/2014 dated 31.12.2014, additional written statement filed by the management

is received. In the additional written statement the management has contended that this Tribunal has no

jurisdiction to consider the claim of the workman. They have pleaded non-joinder of the necessary parties in this matter.

They have called upon the workman to prove that she will come under the purview of the Section 2(s) of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 and that she has got the locus standi to maintain an application of this nature. They have requested

to uphold her contentions.

10.

The workman tendered evidence as WW1 and Exts.W1 to W4 are the documents marked on her behalf. On

behalf of the management MW1 was examined. Heard both sides.

11.

The points arising for consideration are:

“(i) Whether the applicant herein will come under the purview of “workman” as defined under

Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947?

(ii)

Whether the workman is entitled to get an order of reinstatement as Ayah under the

management with continuity of service as claimed by her?

(iii) Reliefs and costs?”

12.

Point Nos.(i) & (ii):-

This is an application filed by the individual workman under Section 2A(2) of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Her case is that as per appointment order No.17FBSU/358/2/Org. dated 04.08.1992 she

was appointed as Ayah under the management. She would further state that she was treated as a conservancy worker in

the medical inspection room of the management. According to the workman she comes under the purview of Section

2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act. She has alleged termination of her employment by the management without any

reason and denial of her right to continue in employment. According to her the management will come under the

purview of Section 2(g) of the Industrial Disputes Act. Earlier she had approached the Hon’ble Central Administrative

Tribunal on two occasions by filing OA Nos.306/1998 and 293/2002. She had also approached the Hon’ble High Court

of Kerala by filing WP(C) No.26075/2005. According to the workman she is entitled to continue her employment under

the management as Ayah and that her denial of employment by the management is illegal.

13.

The management has specifically denied the claim of the workman under the purview of the Industrial Disputes

Act. They have stated that she will not come under the purview of “workman” as defined under Section 2(s) of the

Industrial Disputes Act. They have stated that the applicant was employed as a part time daily wages employee in the

medical inspection room attached to the Commanding Officer, Thiruvananthapuram and the wages due to her is paid

from and out of the Regimental Funds, contributed by Air Warriors of the base station for their welfare activities. On

going through the contentions of the workman and that of the management it is clear that the workman herein was

employed purely on temporary basis.

14.

Ext.W1 is copy of the appointment order dated 04.08.1992 issued to the workman by the Chief Administrative

Officer. The Ext.W1 order reveals that the workman was appointed as part time Ayah to work in the unit of the medical

inspection room on temporary basis. Ext.W2 is copy of the order in OA No.306/1998 passed by the Hon’ble Central

Administrative Tribunal, Ernakulam Bench. The Ext.W2 order also will not confer any absolute right of employment to

the workman under the management. Ext.W3 is copy of the order in OA No.293/2002 passed by the Hon’ble Central

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938

2375

Administrative Tribunal, Ernakulam Bench . Ext.W3 order also will not entitle the applicant/workman herein to

continue her services under the management. Ext.W4 is copy of the judgment in WP(C) No.26075/2005(S) passed by

the Hon’ble High Court of Kerala. In Ext.W4 judgment the Hon’ble High Court of Kerala has made it clear that the

appointment of the workman is not to any post but it is only on adhoc basis using the fund available with the first

respondent. The Hon’ble High Court of Kerala has observed that as and when there is a vacancy on temporary basis the

request of the workman may also be considered. The said observation by the Hon’ble High Court of Kerala will not

confer any legal right to the applicant for continuity of service or reinstatement in service under the management.

15.

While examined as WW1 the applicant has stated that she has not preferred any appeal against Ext.W4

judgment passed by the Hon’ble High Court of Kerala. Even as per the contentions of the applicant it is evident that she

was working purely on temporary basis under the management. While examined as MW1 the witness examined on

behalf of the management has stated that the applicant was employed on adhoc basis and she was paid from and out of

the non-public fund contributed by the personnel of the Air Force Station. He has stated that when there was a vacancy

in the non-public fund they gave an application to the applicant but she failed to submit any application for that vacancy.

16.

On going through the evidence tendered by WW1 and MW1 and the documents marked in this case it is clear

that the applicant will not come under the purview of Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. It follows that

the applicant is not entitled to any relief claimed in this application. Hence the points for consideration are answered

against the applicant.

17.

Point No.(iii):-

In view of the finding on Point Nos.(i) and (ii) the applicant is not entitled to the reliefs

claimed in this application. The point is answered accordingly.

18.

In the result an award is passed holding that the applicant/workman is not entitled to any of relief claimed as per

this Industrial Dispute.

The Award will come into force one month after its publication in the Official Gazette.

Dictated to the Personal Assistant, transcribed and typed by her, corrected and passed by me on this the 29th day

of April, 2016.

K. SASIDHARAN, Presiding Officer

APPENDIX

Witness for the workman

WW1

08.01.2016

Smt. Nirmaladevi. S.

Witness for the managements

MW1

28.03.2016

Shri Ajit G. Sonna

Exhibits for the workman

W1

-

True copy of the appointment order No.17FBSU/358/2/Org. dated 04.08.1992 issued to

the workman by the Chief Administrative Officer, Air Force Station, Trivandrum.

W2

-

True coy of the Order in OA No.306/1998 dated 18.11.1999 passed by the Hon’ble Central

Administrative Tribunal, Ernakulam Bench

W3

-

True copy of the Order in OA No.293/2002 dated 11.02.2005 passed by the Hon’ble Central

Administrative Tribunal, Ernakulam Bench

W4

-

True copy of the judgment in WP(C) No.26075/2005(S) dated 24.06.2008 passed by the Hon’ble High

Court of Kerala, Ernakulam.

Exhibits for the managements

-

NIL

ubZ fnYyh] 25 ebZ] 2016

dk-vk- 1063-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj ,p,y,y

ykbiQds;j fyfeVsM ds izcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] ,ukZdqye ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 10@2015) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

25-05-2016 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&42011@160@2014&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)]

ih- ds- os.kqxksiky] MsLd vf/dkjh

2376

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 25th May, 2016

S.O. 1063.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (ID No. 10/2015) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Ernakulam now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of the HLL Lifecare Limited and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on

25.05.2016.

[No. L-42011/160/2014-IR (DU)]

P. K. VENUGOPAL, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

ERNAKULAM

Present: Shri.K. Sasidharan, B.Sc., LLB, Presiding Officer

(Wednesday the 27th day of April, 2016/07th Vaisakha, 1938)

ID 10/2015

Unions

:

1.

The General Secretary,

Hindustan Latex Workmen’s Congress (INTUC),

C/o HLL Lifecare Ltd.,

Peroorkada Factory,

Trivandrum – 695005.

2.

The General Secretary,

Hindustan Latex Labour Union (AITUC),

Peroorkada,

Trivandrum – 695005.

By Adv. Shri. M. S. Vijayachandra Babu

3.

The General Secretary,

Hindustan Latex Employees Union (CITU),

Peroorkada,

Trivandrum – 695005.

(ex-parte)

Management

:

The Chairman & Managing Director,

M/s.HLL Lifecare Limited,

Head Office, Poojappura,

Trivandrum – 695012.

By Adv. Shri. Ajith. S Nair

This case coming up for final hearing on 27.04.2016 and this Tribunal-cum-Labour Court on the same day passed the

following:

AWARD

In exercise of the power conferred by clause (d) of sub-section(1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Act 14 of 1947) the Central Government referred the following dispute before this

Tribunal for adjudication.

2.

The dispute is:

‘Whether the action of the management of M/s. HLL Lifecare Ltd. in denying the payment of arrears on the

overtime work during the period on 01.01.2007 to 31.12.2009 resultant to the memorandum of settlement dated

16th January 2010 is fair and justifiable? If not, what relief they are entitled to?’

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938

2377

3.

After receipt of the reference order No.L-42011/160/2014-IR(DU) dated 05.02.2015, issued by the Ministry of

Labour, Government of India, summons was issued to parties to appear and answer all material points relating to the

dispute and to produce the documents to substantiate their respective contentions. On receipt of the summons, union

Nos.1 & 2 and the management entered appearance through counsel. Summons was served on union No.3. Union No.3

was called absent and set ex-parte. Union Nos.1 & 2 filed claim statement and the matter was posted for written

statement of the management. While so union No.1 filed IA No.68/2016 and union No.2 filed IA No.69/2016 with a

request to pass an award holding that there is no subsisting industrial dispute to be adjudicated between the union and

the management. Paragraph Nos.3 & 4 of the affidavit filed in support of the IA Nos.68/2016 and 69/2016 read as

follows:-

“3.

The matter in dispute has been resolved by paying the arrears on overtime work during the period from

1.01.2007 to 31.12.2009 resultant to the memorandum of settlement dated 16.01.2010. As such there is no

dispute at present between the management and this union.

4.

As there is no dispute exists at present between the parties an award may be passed on the ground that

there is no dispute exists. The accompanying petition to pass an award may kindly be allowed.”

4.

Notice of this application was given to the learned counsel for the management. Heard both sides.

5.

From the affidavit filed in support of IA Nos.68/2016 and 69/2016 it is seen that the dispute between the unions

on the one hand and the management on the other have been settled amicably and at present there is no subsisting

industrial dispute to be adjudicated as per the reference.

6.

In the result an award is passed holding that there is no subsisting Industrial Dispute to be adjudicated between

the parties.

The award will come into force one month after its publication in the Official Gazette.

Dictated to the Personal Assistant, transcribed and typed by her, corrected and passed by me on this the 27th day

of April, 2016.

SASIDHARAN K., Presiding Officer

APPENDIX

-

NIL

ubZ fnYyh] 25 ebZ] 2016

dk-vk- 1064-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vksfj,.Vy

flD;ksfjVh l£ol ,aM vnlZ ds izcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] Hkqousoj ds iapkV (lanHkZ dsl la- 57@2014) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj

dks 25-05-2016 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&42011@95@2014&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)]

ih- ds- os.kqxksiky] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 25th May, 2016

S.O. 1064.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (ID Case No. 57/2014) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Bhubaneswar now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation

to the management of the Oriental Security Service and Others and their workman, which was received by the Central

Government on 25.05.2016.

[No. L-42011/95/2014-IR (DU)]

P. K. VENUGOPAL, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, BHUBANESWAR

Present:

Shri B.C. Rath,

Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-cum-Labour

Court, Bhubaneswar.

2378

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 57/2014

L-42011/95/2014-IR (DU), dated 11.11.2014

Date of Passing Order – 26th April, 2016

Between:

1. The Managing Director,

M/s. Oriental Security Service,

Plot No. 85, Po. Sahidnagar,

Bhubaneswar (Odisha) – 751 007

2. The Principal, Regional

Institute of Education Worker’s Union,

At CITU Odisha State Office,

VR-5/1, Unit-3, Kharvelnagar,

Bhubaneswar, Odisha – 751 001.

…

1st Party-Managements.

(And)

The President,

Regional Institute of Education

Worker’s Union, At. CITU

Odisha State Office,

VR-5/1, Unit-3, Kharvelnagar,

Bhubaneswar, Odisha – 751 001

…

2nd Party-Union.

Appearances:

None

…

For the 1st Party-Managements.

None

…

For the 2nd Party-Union.

ORDER

Case taken up. Parties are absent. The 2nd Party-Union has not filed any statement of claim despite sending

notices through registered post. In order to give a last opportunity to the 2nd party-Union notice was issued to it on

04.03.2016 fixing 26.4.2016 for appearance and for filing of statement of claim, but neither the 2nd party-Union caused

appearance today nor has filed any statement of claim. As such it seems that the 2nd party-Union is not interested in

prosecuting its case. However the dispute cannot be adjudicated upon for want of pleadings on behalf of the parties. As

such there is no alternative except to return the reference to the Government for necessary action at its end.

2.

Accordingly the reference is returned to the Government unanswered for necessary action at its end.

Dictated & Corrected by me.

B.C. RATH, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 25 ebZ] 2016

dk-vk- 1065-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj tokgj uoksn;

fo|ky; ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV ¹vkbZ-Mh- lanHkZ la- (lhthvkbZVh,) 1152@2004º dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh;

ljdkj dks 25-05-2016 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&42012@23@99&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)]

ih- ds- os.kqxksiky] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 25th May, 2016

S.O. 1065.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award [I.D. Ref. No. (CGITA) 1152/2004] of the Central Government Industrial

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938

2379

Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management

of the Jawahar Novodaya Vidyalaya and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 25.05.2016.

[No. L-42012/23/99-IR (DU)]

P. K. VENUGOPAL, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present:

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 25th April, 2016

Reference: (CGITA) No. 1152/2004

The Principal,

Jawahar Navodaya Vidhyalaya,

At & PO – Dhrangadhra,

Distt. – Surendranagar

Gujarat – 363310

…First Party

v/s

Shri Dave Kiritkumar Prahladbhai,

Near Rama Pir Mandir, Rajsitapar,

Tal. – Dhrangadhra,

Distt. – Surendranagar

Gujarat – 363310

…Second Party

For the First Party

:

Shri P.M. Rami

For the Second Party

:

None

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour ,New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-42012/23/99-

IR(DU) dated 14.09.1999 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad(Gujarat) in respect

of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether Shri Dave Kiritkumar Prajladbhai who has been entrusted with the job of catering meals and

refreshments by the management of Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya, Dhrangadhra, can been deemed as a

workman in terms of Section 2 (S) of the I.D. Act? If so, whether the awarding of catering contract to another

person by the management on the plea that Shri Dave Kiritkumar Prahladbhai did not sign the necessary

contract is legal and justified? If not, to what relief he is entitled?”

1.

The reference dates back to 14.09.1999. Second party submitted the statement of claim Ext. 5 on 10.12.1999.

First party submitted the written statement Ext. 12 on 06.07.2000. Since then second party has not led his evidence.

First party’s advocate Shri P.M. Rami has moved and application Ext. 32 for closing purses today. As the second party

has not been prosecuting the case since the filing the statement of claim Ext. 5 on 10.12.1999. Thus this tribunal has no

option but to dismiss the reference in default of the second party.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

Uploaded by Dte. of Printing at Government of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi-110064

and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi-110054.