2461 GI/2016
(2271)
jftLVªh la- Mh- ,y- (,u) 04@0007@2003µ05
REGD. NO. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05
izkf/dkj ls izdkf'kr
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
lkIrkfgd
WEEKLY
la- 22]
ubZ fnYyh] ebZ 22—ebZ 28] 2016] 'kfuokj@T;s"B 1— T;s"B 7] 1938
No. 22]
NEW DELHI, MAY 22—MAY 28, 2016, SATURDAY/JYAISTHA 1— JYAISTHA 7, 1938
bl Hkkx esa fHkUu i`"B la[;k nh tkrh gS ftlls fd ;g i`Fkd ladyu ds :i esa j[kk tk lds
Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation
Hkkx II—[k.M 3—mi&[k.M (ii)
PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)
Hkkjr ljdkj ds ea=kky;ksa (j{kk ea=kky; dks NksM+dj) }kjk tkjh fd, x, lkafof/d vkns'k vkSj vf/lwpuk,a
Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India
(Other than the Ministry of Defence)
गृह मंालय
नई द ली, 18 मई, 2016
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 1020
1020
1020
1020.—के ीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासकय योजन के िलए योग) िनयम, 1976 (यथा
संशोिधत 1987) के िनयम 10 के उप-िनयम (4) के अनुसरण म%, गृह मं(ालय के िन) निलिखत काया,लय म% िह दी का
काय,साधक .ान रखने वाले कम,चा1रय क सं2 या 80 ितशत से अिधक हो जाने के फल4 व5प इन काया,लय को एत8ारा
अिधसूिचत करती है:-
1.
1.
1.
1.
के ी
के ी
के ी
के ीय रजव पुिलस बल
य रजव पुिलस बल
य रजव पुिलस बल
य रजव पुिलस बल
1. पुिलस उप महािनरी:क ितिवोिहता एवं आतंकवाद िवरोधी 4 कूल, के ीय 1रजव, पुिलस बल, िशवपुरी (म> य
देश)
2. काया,लय पुिलस उप महािनरी:क/ाचाय, रंग5ट िश:ण के , के ीय 1रजव, पुिलस बल, अमेठी (उB तर देश)
2.
2.
2.
2.
के ी
के ी
के ी
के ीय औोिगक सुरा बल
य औोिगक सुरा बल
य औोिगक सुरा बल
य औोिगक सुरा बल
1. केऔसुब समूह खदान बोलानी (ओिडशा)
2. केऔसुब इकाई जीओएम गुआ (झारखंड)
2272
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
3. केऔसुब इकाई आरआईएल जामनगर (गुजरात)
4. केऔसुब डीओएस मु2 यालय, ब%गलु5 (कना,टक)
5. केऔसुब इकाई भा.िव.िन. कलपाG कम (तिमलनाडु)
6. केऔसुब 6वH आरि:त वािहनी देवली (राज4 थान)
7. केऔसुब इकाई आरजीआईए, एएसजी हैदराबाद (आंK देश)
8. केऔसुब इकाई केकेएनपीपी कुडनकुलम (तिमलनाडु)
9. केऔसुब इकाई एसएमपीएल राजकोट (गुजरात)
10. केऔसुब आईपीआरसी महे िगरी (तिमलनाडु)
11. केऔसुब इकाई सीसीएल एनके एवं िपपरवार, रांची (झारखंड)
3.
3.
3.
3.
भारत
भारत
भारत
भारत-ित ब
ित ब
ित ब
ित बत सीमा पुिलस
त सीमा पुिलस
त सीमा पुिलस
त सीमा पुिलस
1. 47वH वािहनी भा. ित. सी. पुिलस बल, िजला सा) बा (ज) मू व कL मीर)
2. 51वH वािहनी भा. ित. सी. पुिलस बल, प1टयाला (पंजाब)
3. 52वH वािहनी भा. ित. सी. पुिलस बल, भोपाल (म> य देश)
4. 53वH वािहनी भा. ित. सी. पुिलस बल, िजला-िचB तूर (आंK देश)
5. 55वH वािहनी भा. ित. सी. पुिलस बल, िजला-लोअर दवांग वैली (अOणाचल देश)
6. 56वH वािहनी भा. ित. सी. पुिलस बल, िजला-खुदा, (ओिडशा)
7. :े. मु. (ब%गलुO/ए. एन. ओ) वािहनी भा. ित. सी. पुिलस बल, ब%गलुO (कना,टक)
8. आर. टी. सी. वािहनी भा. ित. सी. पुिलस बल, िजला: िशवगंगई (तिमलनाडु)
[सं. 12017/01/2012-िह दी]
राकेश कुमार, संयुG त िनदेशक (राजभाषा)
MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS
New Delhi , the 18th May, 2016
S.O. 1020.—In pursuance of sub rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (Use for official purposes of the
Union) Rules, 1976 (as amended in 1987), the Central Government hereby notifies the following office of the Ministry
of Home Affairs, wherein the percentage of the staff, having working knowledge of Hindi has gone above 80%.
1. Central Reserve Police Force
i)
Office of Dy. Inspector General of Police, Counter Insurgency and Anti Terrorism School, Central
Reserve Police Force, Shivpuri (M.P.)
ii)
Office of Dy. Inspector General of Police/Principal, Recruits Training Center, Central Reserve Police
Force, Amethi (U.P.)
2. Central Industrial Security Force
(i)
CISF Group, Mines Bolani (Odisha)
(ii)
CISF Unit, GOM Gua (Jharkhand)
(iii)
CISF Unit, RIL Jamnagar (Gujrat)
(iv)
CISF DOS HQrs., Bangalore (Karnatak)
(v)
CISF Unit BVN Kalpakkam (Tamil Nadu)
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938
2273
(vi)
CISF 6th Res. Bn. Deoli (Rajasthan)
(vii)
CISF Unit RGIA, ASG Hyderbad (Andra Pradesh)
(viii)
CISF Unit, KKNPP Koodankulam (Tamil Nadu)
(ix)
CISF Unit, SMPL Rajkot (Gujrat)
(x)
CISF Unit, IPRC Mehendragiri (Tamil Nadu)
(xi)
CISF Unit, CCL NK & Piparwar, Ranchi (Jharkhand)
3. Indo-Tibetan Border Police
(i)
47th Battalion I.T.B.P., Distt- Sambha (J&K)
(ii)
51st Battalion I.T.B.P, Patiala (Punjab)
(iii)
52nd Battalion I.T.B.P, Bhopal (Madhya Pradesh)
(iv)
53rd Battalion I.T.B.P, Chittoor (Andra Pradesh)
(v)
55th Battalion I.T.B.P, Distt-Lower Dibang Valley (Arunachal Pradesh)
(vi)
56th Battalion I.T.B.P, Distt-Khordha (Odisha)
(vii)
Regional Hqrs. (Bangaluru/ ANO), I.T.B.P, Bangaluru (Karnatak)
(viii)
RTC, I.T.B.P, Distt-Shivgangai
[No. 12017/01/2012-Hindi]
RAKESH KUMAR, Jt. Director (OL)
fons'k ea=kky;
(lh-ih-oh- izHkkx)
ubZ fnYyh] 17 ebZ] 2016
dk-vk- 1021-—jktuf;d vkSj dksalqyh; vf/dkjh ('kiFk ,oa iQhl) ds vf/fu;e] 1948 (1948 dk 41) dh /kjk 2 ds
[akM (d) ds vuqlj.k esa oSèkkfud vkns'k A
,rn~}kjk] dsaæ ljdkj Hkkjr ds iz/ku dksalykokl] tík esa Jh txeksgu ¯lg] ofj"B lfpoky; lgk;d dks fnukad 17 ebZ] 2016
ls lgk;d dksalqyj vf/dkjh ds rkSj ij dksalqyj lsokvksa ds fuoZgu ds fy, izkfèkd`r djrh gS A
¹la- Vh&4330@01@2016º
izdk'k pUn] mi lfpo (dksalqyj)
MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS
(CPV DIVISION)
New Delhi, the 17th May, 2016
S.O. 1021.—Statutory Order in pursuance of the clause (a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular
Officers (Oaths and Fees) Act, 1948 (41 of 1948), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Jagmohan Singh,
Senior Secretariat Assistant as Assistant Consular Officer in Consulate General of India, Jeddah to perform the
Consular services with effect from 17th May, 2016.
[No. T-4330/01/2016]
PRAKASH CHAND, Dy. Secy. (Consular)
ubZ fnYyh] 19 ebZ] 2016
dk-vk- 1022-—jktuf;d vkSj dksalqyh; vf/dkjh ('kiFk ,oa iQhl) ds vf/fu;e] 1948 (1948 dk 41) dh /kjk 2 ds
[akM (d) ds vuqlj.k esa oSèkkfud vkns'k A
2274
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
,rn~}kjk] dsaæ ljdkj Hkkjrh; okf.kT; nwrkokl] tkfgnu esa Jh lquhy dqekj lwn] lgk;d vuqHkkx vf/dkjh dks fnukad 19 ebZ]
2016 ls lgk;d dksalqyj vf/dkjh ds rkSj ij dksalqyj lsokvksa ds fuoZgu ds fy, izkfèkd`r djrh gS A
¹la- Vh&4330@01@2016º
izdk'k pUn] mi lfpo (dksalqyj)
New Delhi, the 19th May, 2016
S.O. 1022.—Statutory Order in pursuance of the clause (a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular
Officers (Oaths and Fees) Act, 1948 (41 of 1948), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Sunil Kumar Sood,
ASO as Assistant Consular Officer in Consulate of India, Zahidan to perform the Consular services with effect from
19th May, 2016.
[No. T-4330/01/2016]
PRAKASH CHAND, Dy. Secy. (Consular)
िव
िव
िव
िव मंालय
मंालय
मंालय
मंालय
(राज व
राज व
राज व
राज व िवभाग
िवभाग
िवभाग
िवभाग)
नई दली, 25 मई, 2016
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 1023
1023
1023
1023.—िवB त मं(ालय, राज4 व िवभाग Qारा दनांक 24.12.2014 क अिधसूचना (फा. सं.
ए- 35011/6/2013-शा.ईडी) क िनरंतरता म% और िवदेशी मुा बंधन अिधिनयम, 1999 (1999 का 42) क धारा 37
क उप धारा (2) Qारा दत शिRय का योग करते Sए क% सरकार एतदQारा Tीमती नीता एन. बेहरामUाम, सहायक
महाबंधक, भारतीय 1रजव, बVक, जो वत,मान म% वत,न िनदेशालय, मु2 यालय काया,लय, नई द ली म% उप िनदेशक के 4 तर
पर परामश,दाता के 5प म% तैनात हV, को 16.12.2014 से एक वष, क अविध के िलए या वत,न िनदेशालय म% उनक
तैनाती तक िवदेशी मुा बंधन अिधिनयम,1999 (1999 का 42) क धारा 13 म% उिलिखत कसी उ लंघन क जांच
करने के िलए ािधकृत करती है।
[फा. सं. ए-35011/06/2013-शा.-ईडी]
वी. Tीकुमार, अवर सिचव
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
New Delhi, the 25th May, 2016
S.O. 1023.—In continuation of Notification dated 24.12.2014 issued by Ministry of Finance Department of
Revenue (F.No.A-35011/6/2013-Ad.ED) and in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of Section 37 of
Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (42 of 1999), the Central Government hereby authorizes Smt. Neeta N.
Behramfram, Assistant General Manager, Reserve Bank of India, presently posted as Consultant at the level of Deputy
Director in the Directorate of Enforcement, Head Quarters Office, New Delhi to investigate any contravention referred
to in section 13 of Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (42 of 1999) for a period of one year from 16.12.2014 or
till her posting in Enforcement Directorate.
[F. No. A-35011/06/2013-Ad.ED]
V. SREEKUMAR, Under Secy.
dkfeZd] yksd f’kdk;r rFkk isa’ku ea=ky;
dkfeZd] yksd f’kdk;r rFkk isa’ku ea=ky;
dkfeZd] yksd f’kdk;r rFkk isa’ku ea=ky;
dkfeZd] yksd f’kdk;r rFkk isa’ku ea=ky;
¼dkfeZd vkSj izf’k{k.k foHkkx½
¼dkfeZd vkSj izf’k{k.k foHkkx½
¼dkfeZd vkSj izf’k{k.k foHkkx½
¼dkfeZd vkSj izf’k{k.k foHkkx½
ubZ fnYyh] 19 ebZ] 2016
dk-vk- 1024-—dsUnz ljdkj ,rn}kjk naM izfdz;k lafgrk] 1973 ¼1974 dk vf/kfu;e la- 2½ dh /kkjk 24 dh mi/kkjk ¼8½ }kjk iznRr
‘kfä;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, egkjk”Vª jkT; ds iq.ks] vgenuxj] vkSjaxkckn] chM] tyuk] djkM] dksYgkiqj] ekysxkao] ektyxkao] vksLekukckn] lkaxyh]
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938
2275
lrkjk ,oa ‘kksykiqj esa dsUnzh; vUos”k.k C;wjks }kjk mUgsa lkSais x, fnYyh fo’ks”k iqfyl LFkkiuk ¼ds-v- C;wjks½ }kjk laLFkkfir ekeyksa dk fopkj.k
U;k;ky;ksa esa vfHk;kstu dk lapkyu djus rFkk fof/k }kjk laLFkkfir iqujh{k.k vFkok vihyh; U;k;ky;ksa esa mu ekeyksa ls mRiUu izklafxd vU;
ekeyksa esa vihy@iqujh{k.k gsrq fuEufyf[kr vf/koDrkvksa dks mudh fu;qfDr dh rkjh[k ls rhu o”kZ dh vof/k rd vFkok vxys vkns’kksa rd] tks Hkh
igys gks] fo’ks”k yksd vfHk;kstd ds :i esa fu;qDr djrh gS%
loZJh
¼1½
vkuan xksiky dq:Mdj
¼2½
fot;dqekj Hkqtaxjko /kdkus
[Qk- la- 225@05@2016&,-oh-Mh--II]
eks0 unhe] voj lfpo
MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS
(Department of Personnel and Training)
New Delhi, the 19th May, 2016
S.O. 1024.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (8) of section 24 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure, 1973 (Act No. 2 of 1974), the Central Government hereby appoints following Advocates as Special Public
Prosecutor for conducting prosecution of cases instituted by Delhi Special Police Establishment (CBI) in the State of
Maharashtra at Pune, Ahmednagar, Aurangabad, Beed, Jalna, Karad, Kolhapur, Malegaon, Majalgaon, Osmanabad,
Sangli, Satara and Solapur as entrusted to them by the Central Bureau of Investigation in the trial courts and
appeals/revisions or other matters arising out of these cases in revisional or appellate courts established by law for a
period of three years from the date of appointment of further orders, whichever is earlier.
S/Shri
(1)
Anand Gopal Kurdukar
(2)
Vijay Kumar Bhujangrao Dhakane
[F.No. 225/05/2016-AVD-II]
Md. NADEEM, Under Secy.
ubZ fnYyh] 26 ebZ] 2016
dk-vk- 1025-—dsUnz ljdkj ,rn}kjk naM izfdz;k lafgrk] 1973 ¼1974 dk vf/kfu;e la- 2½ dh /kkjk 24 dh mi/kkjk ¼8½ }kjk iznRr
‘kfä;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, dksfgek vkSj fnekiqj fLFkr ukxkySaM jkT; esa dsUnzh; vUos”k.k C;wjks }kjk mUgsa lkSais x, fnYyh fo’ks”k iqfyl LFkkiuk
¼lhchvkbZ½ }kjk laLFkkfir ekeyksa dk Vz~k;y U;k;ky;ksa rFkk dksfgek fLFkr xqokgkVh mPp U;k;ky; dh dksfgek ihB esa vfHk;kstu dk lapkyu
djus rFkk fof/k vkSj dksfgek fLFkr xqokgkVh mPp U;k;ky; dh dksfgek ihB }kjk laLFkkfir iqujh{k.k vFkok vihyh; U;k;ky;ksa esa mu ekeyksa ls
mRiUu izklafxd vU; ekeyksa esa vihy@iqujh{k.k lapkyu djus ds fy, Jh casxMSaxokcSax] vf/koDrk dks fo’ks”k yksd vfHk;kstd ds :i esa fu;qDr
djrh gSA
[Qk- la- 225@02@2016&,-oh-Mh--II]
eks- unhe] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 26th May, 2016
S.O. 1025.— In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section(8) of section 24 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure, 1973 (Act No. 2 of 1974), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Bengdangwabang, Advocate as
Special Public Prosecutor for conducting prosecution of cases instituted by Delhi Special Police Establishment (CBI) in
the state of Nagaland at Kohima and Dimapur as entrusted to him by the Central Bureau of Investigation in the trial
courts and in the Kohima Bench of Gauhati High Court at Kohima and appeals/revisions or other matters arising out of
the cases in revisional or appellate courts established by law and Kohima Bench of Gauhati High Court at Kohima.
[F. No. 225/02/2016-AVD-II]
Md. NADEEM, Under Secy.
2276
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
miHkksDrk ekeys] [kk| vkSj lkoZtfud forj.k ea=ky;
miHkksDrk ekeys] [kk| vkSj lkoZtfud forj.k ea=ky;
miHkksDrk ekeys] [kk| vkSj lkoZtfud forj.k ea=ky;
miHkksDrk ekeys] [kk| vkSj lkoZtfud forj.k ea=ky;
(miHkksDrk ekeys foHkkx
miHkksDrk ekeys foHkkx
miHkksDrk ekeys foHkkx
miHkksDrk ekeys foHkkx)
¼Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks
Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks
Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks
Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks½
ubZ fnYyh] 25 vizSy] 2016
dk-vk- 1026-—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks (izek.ku) fofu;e 1988 ds fu;e 4 ds mifu;e (5) ds vuqlj.k esa Hkkjrh;
ekud C;wjks ,rn~}kjk vf/klwfpr djrk gS fd ftu ykblsalksa ds fooj.k uhps vuqlwph esa fn, x, gS] os Lohd`r dj fn, x,
gSa %
vuq
vuq
vuq
vuqlwph
lwph
lwph
lwph
Øe
la[;k
Ykkblsal
la[;k
Lohd`r djus
dh frfFk
o"kZ@ekg
Ykkblsal/kkjh dk uke
o Ikrk
Hkkjrh; ekud dk
“kh"kZd
Hkk ek
la[;k
Hkkx
vuq
o"kZ
1
7200022484
01/09/2015
एमटैली इंिडया
िलिमटेड
सव नंबर. 214/1
तथा 214/2
पोईयावा, ता सानंद,
अहमदाबाद 382170
फ टलाईजर तथा
कैिमकल इंजै टर
िस टम
14483
1
-
1997
2
7200022585
01/09/2015
बु ट ला टो
टैकिनकस
एन एच 14, डीसा
हाइवे रोड, ीन वुड
होटल के सामने,
बदरपुरा(कोडाला),
ता पालनपुर,
बनसकांठा 385001
अन लािटसाईजड पी
वी सी पाईपस फार
पोटेबल वाटर स लाईस
-
4985
-
-
2000
3
7200022686
01/09/2015
योगी जवैलस&
शॉप नंबर 3 सुगुन
अपाट&म'ट, 1873/3,
रेलवे टेशन के सामने,
अमलसाद,
सरीबजरंग, नवसारी-
396310
वण& तथा वण& धातु*
के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी
शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन
1417
-
-
1999
4
7200022282
01/09/2015
भा4 यल5 मी लािटक
इंड6ीज
32, आ7 रा
इंडि6यल एसटेट,
महाल5 मी िमलस के
पीछे, नारोल,
अहमदाबाद
382405
8फ9टगस फार :रिजड
नान मैटेिलक कांडयूटस
3419
-
-
1988
5
7200022989
01/09/2015
मैगनम ए ी इ यूपम'ट
;ा िलिमटेड
सव नंबर
.16पी2/पी1पी1
ग<व मालगाड, ता
डीसा बनसकांठा
ईरीगेशन इ यूपम'ट -
एमीटस&
13487
-
-
1992
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938
2277
385535
6
7200023082
08/09/2015
ई7 वरलाल
हरजीवनदास जवैलस&
;ा िलिमटेड
जी एफ-2, त>िशला
कवेयर, संक1 प
कृ@ णा बाग के सामने,,
मणीनगर,
अहमदाबाद
वण& तथा वण& धातु*
के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी
शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन
1417
-
-
1999
7
7200022787
08/09/2015
कAपर िलिमटेड
सव नंबर.823,
राजोडा, अहमदाबाद
राजकोट हाइवे के
पास, ता बावला,
अहमदाबाद 382220
यू पी वी सी पाईप फार
सायल तथा वे ट
िडसचाज& िस टम
इनसाईड िबC1डग
इनकलूCडग व':टलेशन
तथा रेन वाटर िस टम
13592
-
-
2013
8
7200022888
08/09/2015
पोलीकैब वायर ;ा
िलिमटेड
66-72, नुरपुरा, ता
हलोल, पंचमहल,
हलोल 369350
ए:रयल बंचड केब1 स
फार वDकग वोलटेज
अपटू एंड इं लूCडग
1100 वी
14255
-
-
1995
9
7200023183
10/09/2015
Eी कृ@ णा इंड 6ीज
लाट नंबर.87 से 90,
120 से 123
ओम टै सटाई1 स,
पाट&-3, परब, ता
कामरेज
सूरत 394180
अन लािटसाईजड पी
वी सी पाईपस फार
पोटेबल वाटर स लाईस
-
4985
-
-
2000
10
7200023284
11/09/2015
सारने7 वर केबल
इंड 6ीज
महाशिF इंडि6यल
एस् टेट, पाट& 2
अरCवद एस् टेट के
सामने, आर जे
8कनारीवाला के पीछे,
गली नी ;मुख पेलेस,
िचराग डायमंड के
पास, एल बी शा Iी
रोड, बापूनगर,
अहमदाबाद 380024
पी वी सी इंसूले:टड
केबल
694
-
-
1990
11
7200024690
11/09/2015
माड&न पJ प
13, राजकमल एस् टेट,
कुबे7 वर महादेव के
पीछे
जी डी कूल रोड,
सैजपुर बोघा, नरोडा
रोड अहमदाबाद
382345
सबमKसबल पJ पसैट
8034
-
-
2002
2278
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
12
7200023688
11/09/2015
मा भवानी जवैलस&
सुभाष चौक, मेन
बाजार, तालोड,
साबरकांठा 383215
वण& तथा वण& धातु*
के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी
शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन
1417
-
-
1999
13
7200023789
15/09/2015
ईको ीन ;ोड टस
;ा. िलिमटेड
L लाक नंबर.343,
344, 355, एट ग<व:
आलमपुर, ता तथा िड
गांधीनगर 382042
कां8Mट मैसानरी
यूिनटस
2185
3
-
1984
14
7200023385
15/09/2015
अरहम पJ पस
बी-10, बी-11, बी-
12, बी-13,
बी-14, बी-28 तथा
29, जगनाथ
इंडि6यल एसटेट
गुजरात बाटCलग के
पास, रिखयाल
अहमदाबाद 380023
इलैि6क मोनोसैट
पJ पस फार लीयर,
को1 ड वाटर फार
ए ीक1 चर तथा वाटर
सप् लाईस परपस
9079
-
-
2002
15
7200023486
15/09/2015
सN यम ईरीगेशनस
(इंिडया) ;ा िलिमटेड,
लाट नंबर.367,
कथवाडा, जी आई डी
सी, रोड नंबर.8,
अहमदाबाद 382430
ईरीगेशन इ यूपम'ट-
टेनर टाईप 8फलटस&
12785
-
-
1994
16
7200023587
15/09/2015
सN यम ईरीगेशनस
(इंिडया) ;ा िलिमटेड
लाट नंबर.367,
काठवाडा जी आई डी
सी रोड नंबर.8,
अहमदाबाद 382430
ईरीगेशन इ यूपम'ट -
एमीटस&
13487
-
-
1992
17
7200023890
16/09/2015
माकोट पJ पस
1, महाशिF एसटेट,
अ रCवद एसटेट के
पास,
अिनल टाच& िमल के
सामने,
बापूनगर,अहमदाबाद
380025
सबमKसबल पJ पसैट
8034
-
-
2002
18
7200023991
16/09/2015
िजनल ए ो ;ोसैसर
तथा फुड ;ा िलिमटेड
332, मांडवा
कापराडा, नािशक
रोड, एस एच 67, ता
कापराडा, वलसाद
पैकेजबंद
पेयजल (अदर दैन
पैकेQ ड नेचुरल िमनरल
वाटर)
14543
-
-
2004
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938
2279
19
7200024084
18/09/2015
आ था पJ पस
77, आशRवाद
एसटेट,S यू Tुट माक ट
के सामने
नरोडा रोड,
अहमदाबाद 380025
सबमKसबल पJ पसैट
8034
-
-
2002
20
7200024488
18/09/2015
अिभषेक जावेरी
7, इ कान स'टर,
132, 9रग रोड,
सैटेलाईट
रोड अहमदाबाद
380015
वण& तथा वण& धातु*
के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी
शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन
1417
-
-
1999
21
7200024589
18/09/2015
वागत जवैलस&
26, 27, 247,
सोनीवाडा कारनर के
पास, नवा
बाजार,;ांितज,
साबरकांठा 383205
वण& तथा वण& धातु*
के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी
शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन
1417
-
-
1999
22
7200024791
22/09/2015
िववेक जवैलस&
सव नंबर 2725, बस
टाप के पास, पी ओ
पारडी, वलसाद
396125
वण& तथा वण& धातु*
के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी
शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन
1417
-
-
1999
23
7200024892
22/09/2015
अलंकार जवैलस&
ए-01-542, कृ@ णा
शेरी, कारोिलया
पोल,
पी ओ मांडवी, 001
वण& तथा वण& धातु*
के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी
शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन
1417
-
-
1999
24
7200024185
23/09/2015
इंडोपेिस8फक लाई
बोड& ;ा िलिमटेड
30, उमा इंडि6यल
एसटेट, भा4 योदया
होटल के पीछे, सानंद
वीरमगाम हाइवे, ता
सानंद अहमदाबाद
L लाक बोड&
1659
-
-
2004
25
7200024286
23/09/2015
इंडोपेिस8फक लाई
बोड& ;ा िलिमटेड
30, उमा इंडि6यल
एसटेट, भा4 योदया
होटल के पीछे, सानंद
वीरमगाम हाइवे, ता
सानंद अहमदाबाद
लाईवुड फार जनरल
परपस
303
-
-
1989
26
7200024387
23/09/2015
इंडोपेिस8फक लाई
बोड& ;ा िलिमटेड
30, उमा इंडि6यल
एसटेट, भा4 योदया
होटल के पीछे, सानंद
वीरमगाम हाइवे, ता
सानंद अहमदाबाद
वुडन फलश डोर शटस&
(सािलड कोर टाईप)
पाट& 1 लाईवुड फेस
पैनलस
2202
1
-
1999
2280
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
27
7200024993
24/09/2015
िसटा लेिमनेटस ;ा
िलिमटेड लाट नंबर
186, मेहसाणा िवजापुर
रोड, शोभासन के पास,
मेहसाना, कुकास
384001
डैकोरे:टव थमVसै9टग
Cसथै:टक रेिसन बांिडड
लेिमने:टड शीट
2046
-
-
1995
[la- lh ,e Mh 13%11]
डॉ- एस- एल- पालकर] ] ] ] वै6ािनक ‘एफ’ एवं ;मुख
MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION
(Department of Consumer Affairs)
(BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS)
New Delhi, the 25th April, 2016
S.O. 1026.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (5) of the regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards
(Certification) Regulations 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars of
which are given in the following schedule:
SCHEDULE
Sl.
No.
Licences
No.
Grant Date
Name & Address of the party
Title of the
Standard
IS
No.
Part
Sec
Year
1
7200022484
01/09/2015
EMTELLE INDIA LIMITED
SURVEY NO. 214/1 & 214/2
PO IYAVA, TAL: SANAND
Ahmedabad 382170
Fertilizer and
chemical injector
system
14483
1
-
1997
2
7200022585
01/09/2015
BOOST PLASTO TECHNICS
N,H, 14, DEESA HIGHWAY
ROAD
OPP.HOTEL GREEN WOOD
BADARPURA(KODALA)TAL:
PALANPUR
Banaskantha, BADARPURA
385001
Unplasticized pvc
pipes for potable
water supplies -
4985
-
-
2000
3
7200022686
01/09/2015
YOGI JEWELLERS
SHOP NO 3 SUGUN
APARTMENT
1873/3, OPP: RAILWAY
STATION
AMALSAD, SARIBUJRANG
AMALSAD, NAVSARI-396310
Gold and gold
alloys,
jewellery/artefacts
-
fineness and
marking -
1417
-
-
1999
4
7200022282
01/09/2015
BHAGYALAXMI PLASTIC
INDUSTRIES
32, ASHRA INDL ESTATE
BEIND MAHALAXMI MILLS,
NAROL
Ahmedabad 382405
Fittings for rigid
non-metallic
conduits
3419
-
-
1988
5
7200022989
01/09/2015
MAGNUM AGRI
EQUIPMENTS PVT LTD
SURVEY NO.16P2/P1/P1
VILLAGE: MALGADH, TA:
DEESA
BANASKANTHA 385535
Irrigation
equipment -
emitters
13487
-
-
1992
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938
2281
6
7200023082
08/09/2015
ISHWARLAL HARJIVANDAS
JEWELLERS PVT LTD
GF-2, TAKSHASHILA
SQUARE,
OPPOSITE SANKALP
KRISHNABAUGH,
MANINAGAR, AHMEDABAD
Gold and gold
alloys,
jewellery/artefacts
-
fineness and
marking -
1417
-
-
1999
7
7200022787
08/09/2015
SKIPPER LIMITED
SURVEY NO.823, RAJODA,
NEAR AHMEDABAD-RAJKOT
HIGHWAY
TALUKA: BAVLA
AHMEDABAD 382220
Upvc pipes for
soil and waste
discharge
systems inside
buiildings
including
ventilation
and rainwater
system
13592
-
-
2013
8
7200022888
08/09/2015
POLYCAB WIRES PRIVATE
LIMITED
66-72, NOORPURA, TAL:
HALOL
PANCHMAHAL HALOL
369350
Aerial bunched
cables for
working voltagess
upto and
including 1100
volts
14255
-
-
1995
9
7200023183
10/09/2015
SHREE KRISHNA
INDUSTRIES
PLOT NO.87 TO 90, 120 TO 123
OM TEXTILES PART-3,
PARAB
TA: KAMREJ, SURAT 394180
Unplasticized pvc
pipes for potable
water supplies
4985
-
-
2000
10
7200023284
11/09/2015
SARNESHWAR CABLE
INDUSTRIES
MAHASHAKTI INDL ESTATE,
PART 2
OPP ARVIND ESTATE, B/H R J
KINARIWALA GALI IN
PRAMUKH
PALACE, NEAR CHIRAG
DIAMOND
L B SHASTRI ROAD,
BAPUAGAR
AHMEDABAD 380024
Pvc insulated
cables
694
-
-
1990
11
7200024690
11/09/2015
MODERN PUMP
13, RAJKAMAL ESTATE
B/H KUBERESHWAR
MAHADEV
G D SCHOOL ROAD, SAIJPUR
BOGHA
NARODA ROAD, Ahmedabad
382345
Submersible
pumpsets -
8034
-
-
2002
12
7200023688
11/09/2015
MAA BHAVANI JEWELLERS
SUBHASH CHOWK,
MAIN BAZAR, TALOD
SABARKANTHA 383215
Gold and gold
alloys, jewellery/
artefacts -
fineness and
marking -
1417
-
-
1999
2282
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
13
7200023789
15/09/2015
ECO GREEN PRODUCTS PVT
LTD
BLOCK NO.343, 344, 355
AT VILLAGE: ALAMPUR
TAL and DISTT:
GANDHINAGAR
AT: ALAMPUR 382042
Concrete masonry
units
2185
3
-
1984
14
7200023385
15/09/2015
ARHAM PUMPS
B-10, B-11,B-12, B-13,
B-14, B-28 & 29, JAGNNATH
INDUSTRIAL ESATATE,
NEAR GUJARAT BOTTLING,
RAKHIAL
AHMEDABAD 380023
Electric monoset
pumps for clear,
cold water
for agricultural
and water supply
purposes -
9079
-
-
2002
15
7200023486
15/09/2015
SATYAM IRRIGATIONS
(INDIA) PVT LTD, PLOT
NO.367,
KATHWADA GIDC, ROAD
NO.8,
KATHWADA, AHMEDABAD
382430
Irrigation
equipment -
strainer-type
filters -
12785
-
-
1994
16
7200023587
15/09/2015
SATYAM IRRIGATIONS
(INDIA) PVT LTD
PLOT NO.367, KATHWADA
GIDC
ROAD NO.8, KATHWADA
AHMEDABAD 382430
Irrigation
equipment -
emitters -
13487
-
-
1992
17
7200023890
16/09/2015
SMACCOT PUMPS
1, MAHASHAKTI
ESTATE
NEAR ARVIND ESTATE
OPP. ANIL STARCH MILL
BAPUNAGAR Ahmedabad
Gujarat 380025
Submersible
pumpsets
8034
-
-
2002
18
7200023991
16/09/2015
JINAL AGRO PROCESSOR &
FOODS
PVT LTD
332, MANDAWA KAPRADA
NASHIK ROAD SH 67,
TALUKA: KAPRADA,
MANDAWA, VALSAD
Packaged
drinking water
(other than
packaged
natural mineral
water) -
14543
-
-
2004
19
7200024084
18/09/2015
ASTHA PUMPS
77, ASHIRWAD ESTATE
OPP.NEW FRUIT MARKET,
NARODA ROAD,
AHMEDABAD 380025
Submersible
pumpsets
8034
-
-
2002
20
7200024488
18/09/2015
ABHISHEK ZAVERI
7, ISCON CENTRE, 132,
RING ROAD, SETELLITE
ROAD,
AHMEDABAD 380015
Gold and gold
alloys,
jewellery/artefacts
-
fineness and
marking -
1417
-
-
1999
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938
2283
21
7200024589
18/09/2015
SWAGAT JEWELLERS
26, 27, 247, NEAR SONIVADA
CORNER NAVA BAZAR,
PRANTIJ, SABARKANTHA
383205
Gold and gold
alloys,
jewellery/artefacts
-
fineness and
marking -
1417
-
-
1999
22
7200024791
22/09/2015
VIVEK JEWELLERS
SURVEY NO 2725, NEAR BUS
STOP
P O PARDI, VALSAD 396125
Gold and gold
alloys,
jewellery/artefacts
-
fineness and
marking -
1417
-
-
1999
23
7200024892
22/09/2015
ALANKAR JEWELLERS
A-01-542, KRISHNA
SHERI, KAROLIA POLE,
P O MANDVI,VADODARA
390001
Gold and gold
alloys,
jewellery/artefacts
-
fineness and
marking -
1417
-
-
1999
24
7200024185
23/09/2015
INDO PACIFIC PLY BOARDS
PVT LTD
30, UMA INDUSTRIAL
ESTATE
BEHIND BHAGYODAYA
HOTEL
SANAND-VIRAMGAM
HIGHWAY
TAL: SANAND,AHMEDABAD
Block boards
1659
-
-
2004
25
7200024286
23/09/2015
INDO PACIFIC PLY BOARDS
PVT LTD
30, UMA INDUSTRIAL
ESTATE
BEHIND BHAGYODAYA
HOTEL
SANAND-VIRAMGAM
HIGHWAY
TAL: SANAND, AHMEDABAD
Plywood for
general purposes
303
-
-
1989
26
7200024387
23/09/2015
INDO PACIFIC PLY BOARDS
PVT LTD
30, UMA INDUSTRIAL
ESTATE
BEHIND BHAGYODAYA
HOTEL
SANAND-VIRAMGAM
HIGHWAY
TAL: SANAND, AHMEDABAD
Wooden flush
door shutters
(solid core type):
part 1 plywood
face panels
2202
1
-
1999
27
7200024993
24/09/2015
SIESTA LAMINATES PVT LD
PLOT NO 186, MEHSANA
VIJAPUR
ROAD, NEAR SHOBHASAN
MEHSANA, KUKAS 384001
Decorative
thermosetting
synthetic resin
bonded laminated
sheets
2046
-
-
1995
[No. CMD/13:11]
Dr. S. L. PALKAR, Scientist ‘F’ & Head
ubZ fnYyh] 25 vizSy] 2016
dk-vk- 1027-—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks (izek.ku) fofu;e 1988 ds fofu;e (5) ds mifofu;e (6) ds vuqlj.k esa
Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks ,rn~}kjk vf/klwfpr djrk gS fd fuEu fooj.k okys ykblsalksa dks muds vkxs n”kkZ;h xbZ rkjh[k ls
jn~n/LFkfxr dj fn;k x;k gS :-
2284
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
vu
vu
vu
vuqlwph
lwph
lwph
lwph
dze
la[;k
Ykkblsal la[;k
lh,e/,y-
Ykkblsal/kkjh dk uke o Ikrk
Ykkblsal ds varxZr oLrq /izde
lEc2
Hkkjrh; ekud dk “kh"kZd
jnn djus dh
frfFk
1
7834488
मैससA ए केफुडस तथा िबवरेिजस
G लाट नंबर 39, जी आई डी सी एसटेट]
मोडासा]
िडिMNकट साबरकांठा 383315
पैकेजबंद पेयजल
(अदर दैन पैकेजड नेचुरल िमनरल वाटर½
आई एस 14543 : 2004
21-09-2015
2
3969794
मैससA आशUवाद रबर टयूब
168] जी आई डी सी पोर रमनगामडी पोर]
िडिMNX ट वडोदरा 391243
आटोमोिटव िवहीकल- टयूबस फार
Z यूमैिटक टायर
आई एस 13098 % 2012
21-09-2015
[la- lh ,e Mh@13%13]
डॉ- एस- एल- पालकर] ] ] ] वै6ािनक ‘एफ’ एवं ;मुख
New Delhi, the 25th April, 2016
S.O. 1027.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (6) of the regulation 5 of the Bureau of Indian Standards(
Certification) Regulations 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies that the licences particulars of which
are given below have been cancelled with effect from the date indicated against each:
SCHEDULE
Sl.
No.
Licences
No.
CM/L-
Name & Address of the Licensee
Article/Process with
relevant Indian Standards
covered by the licence
cancelled
Date of
Cancellation
1
7834488
M/s A. K. FOODS & BEVERAGES
PLOT NO. 39, G.I.D.C. ESTATE, MODASA,
Distt : SABARKANTHA 383315
Packaged drinking water
(other than packaged natural
mineral water) –
IS 14543:2004
21.09.2015
2
3969794
M/s AASHIRVAD RUBBER TUBE
168, GIDC POR RAMANGAMDI POR ,
Distt : Vadodara 391243
Automotive Vehicles-
Tubes for pneumatic tyres
IS 13098:2012
21.09.2015
[No. CMD/13:13]
Dr. S. L. PALKAR, Scientist ‘F’ & Head
ubZ fnYyh] 25 vizSy] 2016
dk-vk- 1028-—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks (izek.ku) fofu;e 1988 ds fu;e 4 ds mifu;e (5) ds vuqlj.k esa Hkkjrh;
ekud C;wjks ,rn~}kjk vf/klwfpr djrk gS fd ftu ykblsalksa ds fooj.k uhps vuqlwph esa fn, x, gS] os Lohd`r dj fn, x, gSa %
vuq
vuq
vuq
vuqlwph
lwph
lwph
lwph
Øe
la[;k
Ykkblsal
la[;k
Lohd`r djus
dh frfFk
o"kZ@ekg
Ykkblsal/kkjh dk uke o
Ikrk
Hkkjrh; ekud dk
“kh"kZd
Hkk ek
la[;k
Hkkx
vuq
o"kZ
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938
2285
1
7200030180
01/12/2015
Eीजी कृपा इंड 6ीज
L लाक नंबर. 46, एट
भोजपुर
गोCवदपुरा टंडालजा, ता
बोडेली,छोटा उदयपुर
ता सानखेडा 391135
;ीका ट कांMAट
पाईप
(िवद तथा िवदाउट
रेिनफोस&म'ट)
458
-
-
2003
2
7200030483
01/12/2015
हाई टैक पाईपस िलिमटेड
ई-6, जी आई डी सी फेस -
II, रोड एफ सानंद,
अहमदाबाद 382170
टील टयूबस फार
मकैिनकल तथा
जनरल इंिजिनय9रग
परपस
3601
-
-
2006
3
7200030584
02/12/2015
उN सव जवैलस&
हाउस नंबर 60, शॉप नंबर
101, सरदार भीलाडवाला
ब'क के सामने, बाजार रोड,
वलसाद,वापी 396191
वण& तथा वण&
धातु* के आभूषण/
िश1 पकारी शु2ता
एवं मुहरांकन
1417
-
-
1999
4
7200029603
02/12/2015
पाथ& डैकोर ;ा िलिमटेड
लाट नंबर.186, ग<व
कुकास, मेहसाना िवजापुर
रोड, शोभासन चार र ता
के पास,
मेहसाना 384001
L लाक बोड&
1659
-
-
2004
5
7200029906
03/12/2015
अंिबका पाली ला ट
डी-33/B, डायमंड पाक&
नरोडा, जी आई डी सी,
अहमदाबाद 382330
कांडयूटस फार
इलैि6कल
इं टालेशन
9537
3
-
1983
6
7200030988
04/12/2015
जगाजी एकवा
लाट नंबर.1058, पारले
गोडाउन के पीछे,
वामीनारायण मं8दर के
पास, सोखाडा
वडोदरा 395745
पैकेजबंद
पेयजल (अदर दैन
पैकेजड नेचुरल
िमनरल वाटर)
14543
-
-
2004
7
7200030685
09/12/2015
िनिहर पालीमस& इंड 6ीज
L लाक नंबर 809, एट पो ट
सांतेज
गांधीनगर,कलोल
382721
केबल 6ंWकग तथा
डक9टग िस टम फार
इलैि6कल
इंसटालेशन
14927
2
-
2001
8
7200030786
09/12/2015
अमूल इंड 6ीज
लाट नंबर.9, रामदेव
एसटेट, गोता रेलवे Xीज के
कान&र पर, गोता
अहमदाबाद 382481
इलैि6क िसCलग
टाईप फेन तथा
रैगयूलेटस&
374
-
-
1979
9
7200030887
09/12/2015
गोमा ;ोटै ट ;ा. िलिमटेड
नयाका धरमपुर ग<व
सव नंबर. 276, लाट
इंडै स टू टील
डैिसगनेशनस
16014
-
-
2012
2286
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
नंबर.1 से 4, गणपित
वुडपलाई इंड 6ीज के पास,
ता खेडा 387550
10
7200030382
10/12/2015
हाई टैक पाईपस िलिमटेड
ई- 6 जीआईडीसी, फेस -
II, रोड एफ, सानंद
अहमदाबाद 382170
हॉलो टील सै शन
फार ट&कचरल यूस
4923
-
-
1997
11
7200031081
16/12/2015
वीर लािटकस ;ा
िलिमटेड
L लाक नंबर.327, सांतेज
बडसर रोड,सांतेज
ता कलोल, गांधीनगर
382721
टै सटाईल – हाई
ड'िसटी पालीथलीन
(पी पी) वोवन सैक
फार पेकेCजग 10
8कला, 15 8कलो,
20 8कलो, 25 8कलो
तथा 308कलो
फुड ेनस
16208
-
-
2015
12
7200031182
16/12/2015
मैसवो पJ पस
14, भावना एस् टेट, मीरा
इंड 6ीज के सामने, मैमको
नरोडा रोड
अहमदाबाद 380025
ओपनवैल
सबमKसबल पJ पसैट
14220
-
-
1994
13
7200031283
16/12/2015
िसटी िमनरल वाटर
लाट नंबर.5, ाउंड
फलोर
भाजीवाला इंडि6यल
एसटेट, िवभाग-2, ए के
रोड, सूरत 395008
पैकेजबंद
पेयजल (अदर दैन
पैकेजड नेचुरल
िमनरल वाटर)
14543
-
-
2004
14
7200314845
16/12/2015
धनराज जवैलस&
5, Eीमशािलनी माल, आर
सी दत रोड, अलकापुरी,
वडोदरा 390007
वण& तथा वण&
धातु* के आभूषण/
िश1 पकारी शु2ता
एवं मुहरांकन
1417
-
-
1999
15
7200031384
18/12/2015
चं_ेश केबल िलिमटेड
L लाक नंबर.1108, ग<व
छतराल
ता कलोल, गांधीनगर
382729
MासCलकड
पालीथलीन
इंसूले:टड पी वी सी
शीथड केबल
7098
2
-
2011
16
7200031586
23/12/2015
वीटरग माक9टग ;ा
िलिमटेड
लाट नंबर 15, रोड नंबर
4ए,
जी आई डी सी,
काठवाडा,अहमदाबाद
382415
;ेशर स'स:टव
एडहैिसव इंसूले9टग
टेपस फार
इलैि6कल परपस
7809
3
1
1986
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938
2287
17
7200031687
23/12/2015
लैमीफेब इंड 6ीज
लाट नंबर.
4702/4703/4704/4705,
4604-05 जी आई डी
सी( लािटक जोन)
सारीगाम, ता
उमरग<व,वलसाद
396171
ए ो टै सटाईल-
हाई
ड'िसटी पालीथलीन
(एचडीपीई)
लेिमने:टड वावन ले
फलैट टयूब फार
इरीगेशन परपस
16190
-
-
2014
18
7200031788
23/12/2015
एवर ीन बोडलैम ;ा
िलिमटेड
L लाक नंबर 10, एट
िननाट(सरभान ) ता
बारडोली, सूरत
493350
वुड ;ोड टस –
;ीलेिमने:टड
पा टकल बोड&
12823
-
-
1990
19
7200031889
23/12/2015
एवर ीन बोडलैम ;ा
िलिमटेड
L लाक नंबर 110, एट
िननाट(सरभान ) ता
बारडोली, सूरत
493350
वुड पा टकल बोड&
(मीिडयम ड'िसटी)
फार जनरल परपस
3087
-
-
2005
20
7200031990
23/12/2015
नकोडा ;ोड टस
1102/1103, जी आई डी
सी एस् टेट
वाघोिडया, वडोदरा
391760
आउटडोर टाईप `ी
फेस िडि6बयूशन
6ांसफारमर
1180
1
-
2014
21
7200032184
28/12/2015
गायIी टील कापVरेशन
395, जी आई डी सी
एस् टेट, मकरपुरा
वडोदरा 390010
ईरीगेशन इ यूपम'ट
– हाइaोसाइकलोन
8फलटस&
14783
-
-
1989
22
7200032285
28/12/2015
नंदन मैटलस तथा टयूबस
;ा िलिमटेड
सव नंबर.108, पानसर
रोड, छतराल, ता
कलोल गांधीनगर
382729
आटोमो:टव
िवहीकल- टयूबस
फार S यूमै:टक टायर
13098
-
-
2012
23
7200032386
29/12/2015
टी जे Q वैलस&
6/2934, Eीिनवास,
XाहJ ण पंचवटी के सामने,
एम जी रोड
नवसारी-396445
वण& तथा वण&
धातु* के आभूषण/
िश1 पकारी शु2ता
एवं मुहरांकन
1417
-
-
1999
24
7200032588
30/12/2015
मैगनम ए ी इ यूपम'ट ;ा
िलिमटेड
सव नंबर .16पी2/पी1पी1
ग<व मालगाड, ता डीसा
बनसकांठा 385535
एिम9टग पाईपस
िस टम
13488
-
-
2008
2288
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
25
7200032689
30/12/2015
एडलवाइस मैटलस
िलिमटेड
लाट नंबर.35,36.37,38
& 40 बी
जी आई डी सी,
फेस III, नरोडा
अहमदाबाद 382330
वण& तथा वण&
धातु* के आभूषण/
िश1 पकारी शु2ता
एवं मुहरांकन
1417
-
-
1999
[la- lh ,e Mh@13%11]
डॉ- एस- एल- पालकर] ] ] ] वै6ािनक ‘एफ’ एवं ;मुख
New Delhi, the 25th April, 2016
S.O. 1028.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (5) of the regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards(
Certification) Regulations 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars of
which are given in the following schedule:
SCHEDULE
Sl.
No.
Licences
No.
Grant Date
Name & Address of the party
Title of the
Standard
IS
No.
Part
Sec
Year
1
7200030180
01/12/2015
SHREEJI KRUPA INDUSTRIES
BLOCK NO. 46, AT: BHOJPUR
GOVINDPURA TANDALJA
TAL:
BODELI, Chhota Udaipur
TAL: SANKHEDA 391135
Precast concrete
pipes (with and
without
reinforcement)
458
-
-
2003
2
7200030483
01/12/2015
HI-TECH PIPES LIMITED
E-6, GIDC Phase - II,
Road-F, Sanand,
Ahmedabad 382170
Steel tubes for
mechanical and
general
engineering
purposes
3601
-
-
2006
3
7200030584
02/12/2015
UTSAV JEWELLERS
HOUSE NO 60, SHOP NO. 101
OPP: SARDAR BHILADWALA
BANK
BAZAR ROAD, VALSAD,VAPI
396191
Gold and gold
alloys,
jewellery/artefacts
-
fineness and
marking -
1417
-
-
1999
4
7200029603
02/12/2015
PARTH DECOR PVT LTD
PLOT NO.186, VILLAGE:
KUKAS
MEHSANA-VIJAPUR ROAD
NEAR SHOBHASAN CHAR
RASTA
MEHSANA 384001
Block boards
1659
-
-
2004
5
7200029906
03/12/2015
AMBICA POLYPLAST
D-33/B, DIAMOND PARK
NARODA GIDC NARODA
AHMEDABAD 382330
Conduits for
electrical
installations
9537
3
-
1983
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938
2289
6
7200030988
04/12/2015
JAGAJI AQUA
PLOT NO.1058, BEHIND
PARLE
GODOWN, NEAR
SWAMINARAYAN
MANDIR,SOKHADA
VADODARA 395745
Packaged
drinking water
(other than
packaged
natural mineral
water)
14543
-
-
2004
7
7200030685
09/12/2015
NIHIR POLYMERS
INDUSTRIES
BLOCK NO.809,AT.POST:
SANTEJ
SANTEJ,GANDHINAGAR
KALOL 382721
Cable trunking
and ducting
systems for
electrical
installations
14927
2
-
2001
8
7200030786
09/12/2015
AMUL INDUSTRIES
PLOT NO.9, RAMDEV
ESTATE,
GOTA RAILWAY BRIDGE
CORNER,
GOTA, AHMEDABAD 382481
Electric ceiling
type fans and
regulators
374
-
-
1979
9
7200030887
09/12/2015
GOMA PROTECT PVT LTD
NAYAKA-DHARAMPUR
VILLAGE
SURVEY NO.276, PLOT NO.1
TO 4
NEAR GANPATI WOODPLY
INDUSTRIES TALUKA:
KHEDA 387550
Index to steel
designations
16014
-
-
2012
10
7200030382
10/12/2015
HI-TECH PIPES LIMITED
E-6, GIDC PHASE - II, ROAD-F,
SANAND,
AHMEDABAD 382170
Hollow steel
sections for
structural use
4923
-
-
1997
11
7200031081
16/12/2015
VEER PLASTICS PVT LTD
BLOCK NO.327, SANTEJ
VADSAR
ROAD, SANTEJ, TAL: KALOL
GANDHINAGAR 382721
Textiles - high
density
polyethylene
(hdpe)/
polypropylene
(pp) woven sacks
for packaging
10 kg, 15 kg, 20
kg, 25 kg and 30
kg foodgrains
16208
-
-
2015
12
7200031182
16/12/2015
MESVO PUMPS
14, BHAVNA ESTATE, OPP.
MIRA
INDUSTRIES, MEMCO
NARODA ROAD
AHMEDABAD 380025
Openwell
submersible
pumpsets -
14220
-
-
1994
13
7200031283
16/12/2015
CITY MINERAL WATER
PLOT NO.5, GROUND FLOOR
BHAJIWALA INDUSTRIAL
ESTATE
VIBHAG-2, A K ROAD.SURAT
395008
Packaged
drinking water
(other than
packaged
natural mineral
water)
14543
-
-
2004
2290
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
14
7200314845
16/12/2015
DHANRAJ JEWELLERS
5, SHRIMSHALINI MALL,
R C DUTT ROAD, ALKAPURI
VADODARA 390007
Gold and gold
alloys,
jewellery/artefacts
-
fineness and
marking -
1417
-
-
1999
15
7200031384
18/12/2015
CHANDRESH CABLES
LIMTIED
BLOCK NO.1108, VILLAGE:
CHHATRAL
TALUKA:
KALOL,GANDHINAGAR
CHHATRAL 382729
Crosslinked
polyethylene
insulated pvc
sheathed cable
7098
2
-
2011
16
7200031586
23/12/2015
VEETRAG MARKETING PVT
LTD
PLOT NO 15, ROAD NO 4A,
GIDC,
KATHWADA,AHMEDABAD
382415
Pressure sensitive
adhesive
insulating tapes
for electrical
purposes
7809
3
1
1986
17
7200031687
23/12/2015
LAMIFAB INDUSTRIES
PLOT NO. 4702/4703/4704/4705,
4604-05 GIDC (PLASTIC
ZONE)
SARIGAM, TAL. UMERGAON
VALSAD 396171
Agro textile- high
density
polyethylele
(hdpe)
laminated woven
lay flat tube for
irrigation
purpose
16190
-
-
2014
18
7200031788
23/12/2015
EVERGREEN BOARDLAM
PVT LTD
BLOCK NO.110, AT:NINAT
(SARBHON) TAL: BARDOLI
SURAT, BARDOLI 493350
Wood products -
prelaminated
particle boards
12823
-
-
1990
19
7200031889
23/12/2015
EVERGREEN BOARDLAM
PVT LTD
BLOCK
NO.110,]AT:NINAT(SAR
BHON) TAL: BARDOLI
SURAT 493350
Wood particle
boards (medium
density) for
general purposes
3087
-
-
2005
20
7200031990
23/12/2015
NAKODA PRODUCTS
1102/1103, GIDC ESTATE
WAGHODIA VADODARA
391760
Outdoor type
three-phase
distribution
transformers
1180
1
-
2014
21
7200032184
28/12/2015
GAYATRI STEEL
CORPORATION
395, GIDC ESTATE,
MAKARPURA
VADODARA 390010
Irrigation
equipment -
hydrocyclone
filters
14783
-
-
1989
22
7200032285
28/12/2015
NANDAN METALS & TUBES
PVT LTD
SURVEY NO.108, PANSAR
ROAD
CHHATRALTAL KALOL
GANDHINAGAR 382729
Automotive
vehicles - tubes
for pneumatic
tyres -
13098
-
-
2012
23
7200032386
29/12/2015
T Z JEWELLERS
6/2934, SHREENIVAS, OPP:
BRAHMIN
PANCHWADI, M G ROAD
NAVSARI-396445
Gold and gold
alloys,
jewellery/artefacts
-
fineness and
marking -
1417
-
-
1999
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938
2291
24
7200032588
30/12/2015
MAGNUM AGRI EQUIPMENT
PVT LTD
SURVEY NO.16/P2/P1/P1
VILLAGE: MALGADH
TAL: DEESA, BANASKANTHA
385535
Emitting pipes
system
13488
-
-
2008
25
7200032689
30/12/2015
EDELWEISS METALS
LIMITED
PLOT NO.35,36.37,38 & 40 B
GIDC PHASE III,GIDC
NARODA
AHMEDABAD 382330
Gold and gold
alloys,
jewellery/artefacts
-
fineness and
marking -
1417
-
-
1999
[No. CMD/13:11]
Dr. S. L. PALKAR, Scientist ‘F’ & Head
ubZ fnYyh] 25 vizSy] 2016
dk-vk- 1029-—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks (izek.ku) fofu;e 1988 ds fofu;e (5) ds mifofu;e (6) ds vuqlj.k esa
Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks ,rn~}kjk vf/klwfpr djrk gS fd fuEu fooj.k okys ykblsalksa dks muds vkxs n”kkZ;h xbZ rkjh[k ls
jn~n/LFkfxr dj fn;k x;k gS :-
vu
vu
vu
vuqlwph
lwph
lwph
lwph
dze
la[;k
Ykkblsal la[;k
lh,e/,y-
Ykkblsal/kkjh dk uke o Ikrk
Ykkblsal ds varxZr oLrq /izde
lEc}
Hkkjrh; ekud dk ’kh"kZd
jnn djus dh
frfFk
1
0055328
मैसस& टोर'ट केबल िलिमटेड
कमला मिशन रोड, पी बी नंबर.43,
निडयाड, िड खेडा 387001
पी वी सी इंसूले:टड केबल
आई एस 694:1990
02/12/2015
[la- lh ,e Mh 13%13]
डॉ- एस- एल- पालकर] ] ] ] वै6ािनक ‘एफ’ एवं ;मुख
New Delhi, the 25th April, 2016
S.O. 1029.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (6) of the regulation 5 of the Bureau of Indian Standards(
Certification) Regulations 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies that the licences particulars of which
are given below have been cancelled with effect from the date indicated against each:
SCHEDULE
Sl.
No.
Licences
No.
CM/L-
Name & Address of the Licensee
Article/Process with
relevant Indian Standards
covered by the licence
cancelled
Date of
Cancellation
1
0055328
M/s TORRANT CABLES LTD
KAMLA, MISSION ROAD, P B NO.43,,
NADIAD
Distt : Kheda 387001
PVC INSULATED
CABLES
IS 694:1990
02/12/2015
[No. CMD/13:13]
Dr. S. L. PALKAR, Scientist ‘F’ & Head
2292
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ubZ fnYyh] 25 vizSy] 2016
dk-vk- 1030-—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks (izek.ku) fofu;e 1988 ds fu;e 4 ds mifu;e (5) ds vuqlj.k esa Hkkjrh;
ekud C;wjks ,rn~}kjk vf/klwfpr djrk gS fd ftu ykblsalksa ds fooj.k uhps vuqlwph esa fn, x, gS] os Lohd`r dj fn, x, gSa %
vuq
vuq
vuq
vuqlwph
lwph
lwph
lwph
Øe
la[;k
Ykkblsal
la[;k
Lohd`r djus
dh frfFk
o"kZ@ekg
Ykkblsal/kkjh dk uke
o Ikrk
Hkkjrh; ekud dk
’kh"kZd
Hkk ek
la[;k
Hkkx
vuq
o"kZ
1
7200025086
01/10/2015
मंगलमणी जवैलस&
यूिनयन ब'क के पास,
बाजार रोड, एल आर
काJ पलैकस, वापी,
वलसाद 396191
वण& तथा वण& धातु*
के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी
शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन
1417
-
-
1999
2
7200025187
06/10/2015
एस6ाल पालीटै8bक
िलिमटेड
L लाक नंबर:149/1,
150,
151, 172, 176,
ग<व रामपुर, डोलका
खेडा रोड
जी आई डी एसटेट के
सामने, ता डोलका
अहमदाबाद 382225
8फ9टगस फार :रिजड
नान मैटेिलक कांडयूटस
3419
-
-
1988
3
7200025288
08/10/2015
;थम एंटर;ाईस
एसआर नंबर 129/ए,
िचरीपाल िमलस नो
खांचो
;भात टै सटाईस के
पास, नारोल,
अहमदाबाद
382405
पैकेजबंद
पेयजल (अदर दैन
पैकेजड नेचुरल िमनरल
वाटर)
14543
-
-
2004
4
7200025389
09/10/2015
सपना इंड 6ीज
77, अमर एसटेट,
सुपर Xेड के सामने ,
अिनल टाच& रोड,
नरोडा अहमदाबाद
380025
सबमKसबल पJ पसैट
8034
-
-
2002
5
7200025591
12/10/2015
जय अंबे जवैलस&
2613/3, टcनग
पवांइट, अंधे7 वर रोड,
अमलसाड
नवसारी 396310
वण& तथा वण& धातु*
के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी
शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन
1417
-
-
1999
6
7200025490
13/10/2015
जे के वधवा तथा
कJ पनी
लाट नंबर
हाइaोकला:रक एिसड
265
-
-
1993
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938
2293
2920/Aफेस -1
जी आई डी सी वापी
वलसाद 396195
7
7200025692
15/10/2015
सूरज िबवरेिजस
सव नंबर. 376,
8दि4 वजय ए ो
इंड 6ीज
जैन देरासर के पास,
सानंद बावला रोड,
ग<व मोडासर, ता
सानंद, िडि6 ट
अहमदाबाद 382220
पैकेजबंद
पेयजल (अदर दैन
पैकेजड नेचुरल िमनरल
वाटर)
14543
-
-
2004
8
7200025793
15/10/2015
के एस पी पJ पस
66, अमर एसटेट,
लूबी इलैि6कलस के
पास
मैमको Mास
रोड,नरोडा रोड
अहमदाबाद 380025
सबमKसबल पJ पसैट
8034
-
-
2002
9
7200026189
15/10/2015
िमता जवैलस&
1366, मेन बाजार,
गोजा:रया,
मेहसाना 382825
वण& तथा वण& धातु*
के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी
शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन
1417
-
-
1999
10
7200026391
15/10/2015
स'चरी ए वा
टी पी नंबर 8,
सव नंबर .71,
वाड& नंबर. 22-सी,
बैकसाइड नयू बांबे
माक ट,
उमरवाडा, सूरत
पैकेजबंद
पेयजल (अदर दैन
पैकेजड नेचुरल िमनरल
वाटर)
14543
-
-
2004
11
7200026290
16/10/2015
सdाट सी Xाईनस ;ा
िलिमटेड
सव नंबर .283, ग<व
संतलपुर, पालनपुर
कंडाला हाइवे,
संतलपुर, पाटन
385350
आयोडाईसड सॉ1 ट
7224
-
-
2006
12
7200025894
16/10/2015
जावेरी तथा कंपनी
(गुजरात) एल एल पी
13-बी, नोध नंबर.
285/288, लाट
नंबर.9,
च<दी तथा च<दी धातु*
के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी
शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन
2112
-
-
2003
2294
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
S यू नंबर. 2349,
जावेरी हाउस, आई
डी बी आई ब'क के
पास, गोड डोड रोड,
अथवालाईनस,
सूरत 395007
13
7200025995
16/10/2015
जावेरी तथा कंपनी
(गुजरात) एल एल पी
जी/12, वागत
काJ पलैकस, वागत
चार र ता, सी जी
रोड,
एलीसीज,अहमदाबाद
380006
च<दी तथा च<दी धातु*
के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी
शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन
2112
-
-
2003
14
7200026088
16/10/2015
जावेरी तथा कंपनी
(गुजरात) एल एल पी
10, इसकान स'टर,
सैटेलाईट रोड,
जोधपुर,
अहमदाबाद
380015
च<दी तथा च<दी धातु*
के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी
शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन
2112
-
-
2003
15
7200026492
20/10/2015
ह:रओम जवैलस&
शॉप नंबर .2,
राजल5 मी काJ पलै स,
एच डी एफसी ब'क के
नीचे, कोपारली रोड,
गुजन, जी आई डी
सी,वापी, वलसाद
396195
वण& तथा वण& धातु*
के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी
शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन
1417
-
-
1999
16
7200026593
23/10/2015
जी जी सी गुजरात
गो1 ड स'टर ;ा
िलिमटेड
गुजासत हाजरी िमल
कJ पाउंड, िवजय
पे6ाल पJ प के पीछे,
रिखयाल रोड,
अहमदाबाद 380021
वण& तथा वण& धातु*
के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी
शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन
1417
-
-
1999
17
7200026694
26/10/2015
अिभनव पालीमस&
ए-2/3909, जी आई
डी एसटेट, फेस VI,
वटवा, अहमदाबाद
382445
रोटेशनल मोलिडड
पालीथिलन वाटर
टोरेज ट'क
12701
-
-
1996
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938
2295
18
7200026795
26/10/2015
सनातन इंड 6ीज
2-3, ांड िवशाला
एसटेट, कणा&वती
एसटेट के पास
एस पी 9रग रोड,
ओढव, अहमदाबाद
382415
पJ पस – :रजैनरे:टव
या लीयर, को1 ड वाटर
8472
-
-
1998
19
7200026997
27/10/2015
सेफव1 ड िस टमस ;ा
िलिमटेड
1463, 1464, ग<व
मोती बोयन,
खतराज-कलोल रोड,
पुरानी अरCवद िमल
के पास,
खतराज, गांधीनगर,
कलोल 382721
कं6ोलड परकोले9टग
फार फायर फाय9टग
8423
-
-
1994
20
7200027292
28/10/2015
जेबी लािटक
बी-119, Eीराम
इंडि6यल एसटेट
िबले7 वर इंडि6यल
एसटेट के पीछे, 9रग
रोड, ओढव,
अहमदाबाद 382415
इरीगेशन इ यूपम'ट
- रोटे9टग ;ीनकलर
12232
1
-
1996
21
7200027797
28/10/2015
अंिबका जवैलस&
गांधी रोड, मेन
बाजार,
पाटन 384265
वण& तथा वण& धातु*
के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी
शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन
1417
-
-
1999
22
7200027090
29/10/2015
महेश इंड 6ीज
लाट नंबर.500, रोड
नंबर.13, फेस -II,
ओढव 9रग रोड के
पास, काठवाडा,
जीआई डी सी,
अहमदाबाद 382430
अन लािटसाईजड पी
वी सी पाईपस फार
पोटेबल वाटर स लाईस
4985
-
-
2000
23
7200026896
29/10/2015
माही पािलमस&
एस आर नबर 189,
बलाक नंबर.147,
लाट नंबर.06. पैकA
ओलिJपया गली, 8कम
चार र ता,
ता मंगरोल
एट मोटा, बोरासरा,
सूरत394110
अन लािटसाईजड पी
वी सी पाईपस फार
पोटेबल वाटर स लाईस
4985
-
-
2000
2296
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
24
7200028193
29/10/2015
सागर वाटर
41 से 50 पाई लाट
नंबर 9/10 ( ाउंड
फलोर तथा
मेजानाइन फलोर),
भातेना इंडि6यल -2
िचमनी टेकरो के पास,
अंजाना, सूरत
395010
पैकेजबंद
पेयजल (अदर दैन
पैकेजड नेचुरल िमनरल
वाटर)
14543
-
-
2004
25
7200027494
30/10/2015
Eीजी जवैलस&
4, Eीनाथजी
काJ पलै स,िशवम
हािपटल के नीचे
च<दलोिडया,
अहमदाबाद
380081
च<दी तथा च<दी धातु*
के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी
शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन
2112
-
-
2003
26
7200027595
30/10/2015
चोकसी
हाजीउमरभाई
ओडभाई मैमन
मेन बाजार, खेरालू,
मेहसाना
वण& तथा वण& धातु*
के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी
शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन
1417
-
-
1999
27
7200027696
30/10/2015
शैलजास डायमंड
जवैलरी
83-ए, फलैट नंबर.
201, नालंदा
रैिसड'सी, जाली
रैिसड'सी के सामने,
वेसु, सूरत 395007
वण& तथा वण& धातु*
के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी
शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन
1417
-
-
1999
[la- lh ,e Mh@13%11]
डॉ- एस- एल- पालकर] ] ] ] वै6ािनक ‘एफ’ एवं ;मुख
New Delhi, the 25th April, 2016
S.O. 1030.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (5) of the regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards (
Certification) Regulations 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars of
which are given in the following Schedule:
SCHEDULE
Sl.
No.
Licences
No.
Grant Date
Name & Address of the party
Title of the
Standard
IS
No.
Part
Sec
Year
1
7200025086
01/10/2015
MANGALMANI JEWELLERS
NEAR UNION BANK,BAZAR
ROAD, L R COMPLEX,VAPI,
VALSAD 396191
Gold and gold
alloys,
jewellery/artefacts
-
fineness and
marking -
1417
-
-
1999
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938
2297
2
7200025187
06/10/2015
ASTRAL POLYTECHNIK
LIMITED
BLOCK NO:149/1, 150,
151, 172, 176, VILLAGE
RAMPUR,
DHOLKA-KHEDA ROAD, OPP.
GIDC ESTATE, TAL:DHOLKA,
AHMEDABAD 382225
Fittings for rigid
non-metallic
conduits
3419
-
-
1988
3
7200025288
08/10/2015
PRATHAM ENTERPRISE
SR NO.129/A, CHIRIPAL
MILLS NO
KHANCHO NEAR PRABHAT
TEXTILES
NAROL,AHMEDABAD 382405
Packaged
drinking water
(other than
packaged
natural mineral
water) -
14543
-
-
2004
4
7200025389
09/10/2015
SAPNA INDUSTRIES
77, AMAR ESTATE
OPP.SUPER BREAD, ANIL
STARCH ROAD
NARODA,AHMEDABAD
380025
Submersible
pumpsets
8034
-
-
2002
5
7200025591
12/10/2015
JAY AMBE JEWELLERS
2613/3, TURNING POINT,
ANDHESHWAR ROAD,
AMALSAD
SARIBUJRANG, AMALSAD
NAVSARI 396310
Gold and gold
alloys,
jewellery/artefacts
-
fineness and
marking -
1417
-
-
1999
6
7200025490
13/10/2015
J.K.WADHWA AND
COMPANY
PLOT NO 2920/A,PHASE-1
GIDC VAPI, VALSAD 396195
Hydrochloric acid
265
-
-
1993
7
7200025692
15/10/2015
SURAJ BEVERAGES
SURVEY NO. 376, DIGVIJAY
AGRO
INDUSTRIES, NR JAIN
DERASAR, SANAND BAVLA
ROAD, VILLAGE MODASAR,
TAL SANAND
DISTT AHMEDABAD 382220
Packaged
drinking water
(other than
packaged
natural mineral
water) -
14543
-
-
2004
8
7200025793
15/10/2015
KSP PUMPS
66, AMAR ESTATE
NEAR LUBI ELECTRICALS
MEMCO CROSS ROAD,
NARODA ROAD
AHMEDABAD 380025
Submersible
pumpsets -
8034
-
-
2002
9
7200026189
15/10/2015
SMITA JEWELLERS
1366, MAIN BAZAR,
GOZARIYA,
MEHSANA 382825
Gold and gold
alloys,
jewellery/artefacts
-
fineness and
marking -
1417
-
-
1999
10
7200026391
15/10/2015
CENTURY AQUA
TP NO.8, SURVEY
NO.71, WARD NO. 22-C,
BACKSIDE NEW BOMBAY
MARKET,
UMARWADA, SURAT
Packaged
drinking water
(other than
packaged
natural mineral
water) -
14543
-
-
2004
2298
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
11
7200026290
16/10/2015
SAMRAT SEA BRINES PVT
LTD
SURVEY NO.283, VILLAGE:
SANTALPUR, PALANPUR-
KANDALA
HIGHWAY,SANTALPUR,
PATAN 385350
Iodized salt
7224
-
-
2006
12
7200025894
16/10/2015
ZAVERI AND COMPANY
(GUJARAT)
LLP
13-B, NONDH NO. 285/288,
PLOT NO.9,
NEW NO. 2349, ZAVERI
HOUSE, NR IDBI
BANK,GHODDOD ROAD,
ATHWALINES, SURAT 395007
Silver and silver
alloys,
jewellery/artefacts
-
fineness and
marking -
2112
-
-
2003
13
7200025995
16/10/2015
ZAVERI AND COMPANY
(GUJARAT)
LLP
G/12, SWAGAT COMPLEX,
SWAGAT
CHAR RASTA, C G ROAD,
ELLISBRIDGE,AHMEDABAD
380006
Silver and silver
alloys,
jewellery/artefacts
-
fineness and
marking -
2112
-
-
2003
14
7200026088
16/10/2015
ZAVERI AND COMPANY
(GUJARAT)
LLP
10, ISHCON CENTRE,
SATELLITE ROAD, JODHPUR,
AHMEDABAD 380015
Silver and silver
alloys,
jewellery/artefacts
-
fineness and
marking -
2112
-
-
2003
15
7200026492
20/10/2015
HARI OM JEWELLERS
SHOP NO.2, RAJLAXMI
COMPLEX,
BELOW HDFC BANK,
KOPARLI ROAD,
GUNJAN, GIDC, VAPI
VALSAD 396195
Gold and gold
alloys,
jewellery/artefacts
-
fineness and
marking -
1417
-
-
1999
16
7200026593
23/10/2015
GGC GUJARAT GOLD
CENTRE PVT LTD
GUJARAT HOSIERY MILLL
COMPOUND
BEHIND VIJAY PETROL
PUMP
RAKHIAL ROAD,
AHMEDABAD380021
Gold and gold
alloys,
jewellery/artefacts
-
fineness and
marking -
1417
-
-
1999
17
7200026694
26/10/2015
ABHINAV POLYMERS
A-2/3909, GIDC ESTATE
PHASE VI, VATVA
AHMEDABAD 382445
Rotational
moulded
olyethylene water
storage tanks
12701
-
-
1996
18
7200026795
26/10/2015
SANATAN INDUSTRIES
2-3, GRAND VISHALA
ESTATE
NEAR KARNAVATI ESTATE
S P RING ROAD, ODHAV
AHMEDABAD 382415
Pumps -
regenerative or
clear, cold water
8472
-
-
1998
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938
2299
19
7200026997
27/10/2015
SAFEWORLD SYSTEMS PVT
LTD
1463, 1464, VILLAGE: MOTI
BHOYAN
KHATRAJ-KALOL, ROAD
NEAR OLD ARVIND MILL,
KHATRAJ, GANDHINAGAR,
KALOL 382721
Controlled
percolating hose
for fire fighting
8423
-
-
1994
20
7200027292
28/10/2015
J B PLASTIC
B-119, SHRIRAM INDL
ESTATE
BEHIND BILESHWAR
IND.ESTATE
RING ROAD, ODHAV
AHMEDABAD 382415
Irrigation
equipment -
rotating sprinkler
12232
1
-
1996
21
7200027797
28/10/2015
AMBICA JEWELLERS
GANDHI ROAD,
MAIN BAZAR, PATAN 384265
Gold and gold
alloys,
jewellery/artefacts
-
fineness and
marking -
1417
-
-
1999
22
7200027090
29/10/2015
MAHESH INDUSTRIES
PLOT NO.500, ROAD NO.13
PHASE-II, NEAR ODHAV
RING ROAD
KATHWADA GIDC
AHMEDABAD 382430
Unplasticized pvc
pipes for potable
water
supplies
4985
-
-
2000
23
7200026896
29/10/2015
MAHI POLYMERS
SR. NO 189, BLOCK NO.147,
PLOT NO.06.PAIKI
OLAMPIYA GALI,KIM
CHAR RASTA TAL:
MANGROL
AT: MOTA BORASARA,
SURAT 394110
Unplasticized pvc
pipes for potable
water
supplies
4985
-
-
2000
24
7200028193
29/10/2015
SAGAR WATER
41 TO 50 PAI PLOT NO 9/10
(GROUND FLOOR &
MEZZANINE FLOOR)
BHATENA INDUSTRIAL-2
NEAR CHIMANI TEKRO.
ANJANA
SURAT 395010
Packaged
drinking water
(other than
packaged
natural mineral
water) -
14543
-
-
2004
25
7200027494
30/10/2015
SHRIJI JEWELLERS
4, SHRINATHJI COMPLEX
UNDER SHIVAM HOSPITAL
CHANDLODIA, AHMEDABAD
380081
Silver and silver
alloys,
jewellery/artefacts
-
fineness and
marking -
2112
-
-
2003
26
7200027595
30/10/2015
CHOKSI HAJIUMARBHAI
AUDBHAI MEMON
MAIN BAZAR, KHERALU,
MEHSANA
Gold and gold
alloys,
jewellery/artefacts
-
fineness and
marking -
1417
-
-
1999
2300
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
27
7200027696
30/10/2015
SHAILJA'S DIAMOND
JEWELLERY
83-A, FLAT NO. 201,
NALANDA
RESIDENCY, OPP JOLLY
RESIDENCEY, VESU,
SURAT 395007
Gold and gold
alloys,
jewellery/artefacts
-
fineness and
marking -
1417
-
-
1999
[No. CMD/13:11]
Dr. S. L. PALKAR, Scientist ‘F’ & Head
ubZ fnYyh] 25 vizSy] 2016
dk-vk- 1031-—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks (izek.ku) fofu;e 1988 ds fofu;e (5) ds mi&fofu;e (6) ds vuqlj.k esa
Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks ,rn~}kjk vf/klwfpr djrk gS fd fuEu fooj.k okys ykblsalksa dks muds vkxs n”kkZ;h xbZ rkjh[k ls
jn~n/LFkfxr dj fn;k x;k gS :-
vu
vu
vu
vuqlwph
lwph
lwph
lwph
dze
la[;k
Ykkblsal la[;k
lh,e/,y-
Ykkblsal/kkjh dk uke o Ikrk
Ykkblsal ds varxZr oLrq /izde
lEc}
Hkkjrh; ekud dk “kh"kZd
jnn djus dh
frfFk
कोई नहg
[la- lh ,e Mh@13%13]
डॉ- एस- एल- पालकर] ] ] ] वै6ािनक ‘एफ’ एवं ;मुख
New Delhi, the 25th April, 2016
S.O. 1031.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (6) of the regulation 5 of the Bureau of Indian Standards
(Certification) Regulations 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies that the licences particulars of which
are given below have been cancelled with effect from the date indicated against each:
SCHEDULE
Sl.
No.
Licences
No.
CM/L-
Name & Address of the Licensee
Article/Process with
relevant Indian Standards
covered by the licence
cancelled
Date of
Cancellation
NIL
[No. CMD/13:13]
Dr. S. L. PALKAR, Scientist ‘F’ & Head
ubZ fnYyh] 25 vizSy] 2016
dk-vk- 1032-—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks (izek.ku) fofu;e 1988 ds fu;e 4 ds mifu;e (5) ds vuqlj.k esa Hkkjrh;
ekud C;wjks ,rn~}kjk vf/klwfpr djrk gS fd ftu ykblsalksa ds fooj.k uhps vuqlwph esa fn, x, gS] os Lohd`r dj fn,
x, gSa %
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938
2301
vuq
vuq
vuq
vuqlwph
lwph
lwph
lwph
Øe
la[;k
Ykkblsal
la[;k
Lohd`r djus
dh frfFk
o"kZ@ekg
Ykkblsal/kkjh dk uke
o Ikrk
Hkkjrh; ekud dk
“kh"kZd
Hkk ek
la[;k
Hkkx
vuq
o"kZ
1
7200027393
02/11/2015
िवसात है1 थ केयर
एस आर .13 से 16,
21, 22, 35, 114, 57
पाई-ए/1, लाट
नंबर.ए/1 , माhित
इंडि6यल एसटेट,
बी आर सी कालोनी के
सामने, भेढवाड, सूरत
394221.
पैकेजबंद
पेयजल (अदर दैन
पैकेजड नेचुरल िमनरल
वाटर)
14543
-
-
2004
2
7200027999
02/11/2015
गो1 ड लाईन
आरनाम'टस ;ा
िलिमटेड
पहली मंिजल, रोनक
माक ट,
एस टी वकस&शॉप
रोड, मेहसाना
वण& तथा वण& धातु*
के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी
शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन
1417
-
-
1999
3
7200028092
03/11/2015
जे जे जवैलस&
सुभास चौक टावर के
पास
तालोड, साबरकांठा
383215
वण& तथा वण& धातु*
के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी
शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन
1417
-
-
1999
4
7200027898
03/11/2015
ह:रओम इंड 6ीज
लाट नंबर .448,
रोड नंबर 11
काठवाडा,
अहमदाबाद 382415
मोटस& फार सबमKसबल
पJ पसैट
9283
-
-
2013
5
7200030079
06/11/2015
िनशू पेवस&
L लाक नंबर.1824,
िचखली वसडा रोड
हंस कवेरी के पास,
राज कैिमकलस के
सामने ग<व अलीपोर,
ता िचखली , नवसारी
396521
;ीका ट कांMAट L लाकस
फार पेCवग
15658
-
-
2006
6
7200028294
09/11/2015
ह:रओम वुड ;ोड टस
18/ए, जाक
इंडि6यल ए:रया,
ग<व जाक, पी ओ
पारधोल, ता
देहगाम,गांधीनगर
382325
मे:रन लाईवुड
710
-
-
2010
2302
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
7
7200028597
09/11/2015
िमलन जवैलस&
लाट सी-4,शॉप
नंबर.3, ांड कैसटल
िबC1डग
कोपारली रोड,
जीआई डी सी, वापी,
वलसाद 396195
वण& तथा वण& धातु*
के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी
शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन
1417
-
-
1999
8
7200028496
10/11/2015
सुवण&कला ;ा
िलिमटेड.
101, ने7 नल लाजा,
सुपरमाल के
सामने, सी जी रोड,
अहमदाबाद 380006
च<दी तथा च<दी धातु*
के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी
शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन
2112
-
-
2003
9
7200028395
16/11/2015
िशवम फुडस तथा
िबवरेिजस
9,10 सोमे7 वर
काJ पलै स, कुंडाल
ग<व
मेहसाना, कडी
382715
पैकेजबंद
पेयजल (अदर दैन
पैकेजड नेचुरल िमनरल
वाटर)
14543
-
-
2004
10
7200027191
19/11/2015
बु ट ला टो टैकनीक
सव नंबर.89/1,एन
एच, 14, डीसा हाइवे
रोड
ीन वुड होटल के
सामने, बदरपुरा,
कोडाला
ता पालनपुर
385001
अन लािटसाईड पी वी
सी MAन तथा केCसग
पाईपस फार बोर/
टयूबवैल
12818
-
-
2010
11
7200028698
20/11/2015
गीता इंिजिनय9रग
कJ पनी
डी/66, डायमंड पाक&,
नरोडा, जी आई डी
सी एसटेट, नरोडा,
अहमदाबाद 380025
मोटस& फार सबमKसबल
पJ पसैट
9283
-
-
2013
12
7200028799
20/11/2015
परिनल इंड 6ीज
लाट
नंबर.82/9/ए,फेस 1
जी आईडी सी,वटवा,
अहमदाबाद 382445
Cसगल फेस माल ए सी
एंड यूिनवस&ल इलैि6क
मोटस&
996
-
-
2009
13
7200028803
20/11/2015
िवiा पJ प इंड 6ीज
शैड नंबर.13,
िसमफनी एसटेट,
इंगरसोल के पीछे, पी
एच 1,जी आईडी सी,
नरोडा अहमदाबाद
सबमKसबल पJ पसैट
8034
-
-
2002
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938
2303
14
7200029397
23/11/2015
बड़ोदा ए ो
कैिमकलस िलिमटेड
सव नंबर.40,
यशकमल इंिड 6यल
एसटेट, बा का
ताजपुरा रोड, वी पी
पेनलाव, ता हलोल
पंचमहल 389350
मैनकोजैब वाटर
िडसपरिसबल पाउडर
कंसं6ेट
8708
-
-
2006
15
7200029296
24/11/2015
Eीजी िबवरेिजस
सी/41/191 कृ@ णा
इं डि6यल एसटेट, बी
आई डी के सामने,
गोरवा रोड,वडोदरा
390016
पैकेजबंद
पेयजल (अदर दैन
पैकेजड नेचुरल िमनरल
वाटर)
14543
-
-
2004
16
7200029599
26/11/2015
उS नित वायर
इंड 6ीज
सव नंबर.37 तथा
38, देहगाम रोड,
जारोल, ता निडयाड,
खेडा 387230
माईलड टील वायर,
फारमड वायर तथा
टेपस फार आरम9रग
आफ केबले
3975
-
-
1999
17
7200029805
26/11/2015
पाथ& डैकोर ;ा
िलिमटेड
लाट नंबर.186,
ग<व कुकास, मेहसाना
िवजापुर रोड,
शोभासन चार र ता
के पास,
मेहसाना 384001
लाईवुड फार जनरल
परपस
303
-
-
1989
18
7200028904
26/11/2015
एन बी ई मोटस& ;ा
िलिमटेड
1 to 7, ितhपित
एसटेट बाJ बे
हाउCसग के सामने,
िमलन िसनेमा
रोड,सरसपुर,
अहमदाबाद
380024
इंड शन मोटस& –एनजR
एफA श'ट `ी फेस
सकवीरल केज
12615
-
-
2011
19
7200029094
26/11/2015
हीर इंड 6ीज
11, रेवाभाई एसटेट-2
पूरकादीप सोसाइटी के
पीछे,
ल5 मभाई एसटेट के
सामने, अमराईवाडी
अहमदाबाद 380026
सबमKसबल पJ पसैट
8034
-
-
2002
20
7200029195
26/11/2015
पा7 व& इंजीिनयस&
26 वामीनारायण
ल'िडग वालवस
5290
-
-
1993
2304
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
एसटेट, िचराग
डायमंड के पीछे,
अिनल टाच& रोड,
बापूनगर,अहमदाबाद
380025
21
7200029704
27/11/2015
पाथ& डैकोर ;ा
िलिमटेड
लाट नंबर.186,
ग<व कुकास, मेहसाना
िवजापुर रोड,
शोभासन चार र ता
के पास,
मेहसाना 384001
वुडन फलश डोर शटस&
(सािलड कोर टाईप)
2202
1
-
1999
22
7200029498
30/11/2015
लोखंडवाला िसमkट
;ोड टस
एस नंबर.682/पी,
ाम भारत कूल
केपस, गोचर ठाकोर
वास के सामने,वांछ
गाम, ता दसMोई
अहमदाबाद 382449
;ीका ट कांMAट मेनहोल
कवर तथा Tेम
12592
-
-
2002
23
7200030281
30/11/2015
मालाबार गो1 ड ;ा
िलिमटेड
शॉप नंबर.101 तथा
201,
पहली तथा दूसरी
मिजल, केपीपलै:टना,
लाजा हट के सामने,
रेस कोस& सक& ल,
वडोदरा 39007
वण& तथा वण& धातु*
के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी
शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन
1417
-
-
1999
[la- lh ,e Mh@13%11]
डॉ- एस- एल- पालकर] ] ] ] वै6ािनक ‘एफ’ एवं ;मुख
New Delhi, the 25th April, 2016
S.O. 1032.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (5) of the regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards (
Certification) Regulations 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars of
which are given in the following schedule:
SCHEDULE
Sl.
No.
Licences
No.
Grant Date
Name & Address of the party
Title of the
Standard
IS
No.
Part
Sec
Year
1
7200027393
02/11/2015
VISAT HEALTH CARE
SR.NO.13 TO
16,21,22,35,114,57
PAI-A/1, PLOT NO.A/1 ,
MARUTI INDL ESTATE, OPP.B
R C COLONY, BHEDWAD,
SURAT 394221.
Packaged
drinking water
(other than
packaged
natural mineral
water) -
14543
-
-
2004
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938
2305
2
7200027999
02/11/2015
GOLD LINE ORNAMENTS
PVT LTD
IST FLOOR, RONAK MARKET,
ST.WORKSHOP ROAD,
MEHSANA
Gold and gold
alloys,
jewellery/artefacts
-
fineness and
marking -
1417
-
-
1999
3
7200028092
03/11/2015
J J JEWELLERS
NEAR SUBHAS CHOWK
TOWER
TALOD, SABARKANTHA
383215
Gold and gold
alloys,
jewellery/artefacts
-
fineness and
marking -
1417
-
-
1999
4
7200027898
03/11/2015
HARI OM INDUSTRIES
PLOT NO.448, ROAD NO.11
KATHWADA, AHMEDABAD
382415
Motors for
submersible
pumpsets -
9283
-
-
2013
5
7200030079
06/11/2015
NISHU PAVERS
BLOCK NO.1824, CHIKHLI-
VASDA ROAD
NEAR HANS QUARY, OPP.
RAJ CHEMICALS, VILLAGE-
ALIPORE
Tal-CHIKHLI. NAVSARI
396521
Precast concrete
blocks for paving
15658
-
-
2006
6
7200028294
09/11/2015
HARIOM WOOD PRODUCTS
18/A, ZAK INDUSTRIAL
AREA, VILL ZAK, PO
PARDHOL, TAL DEHEGAM
GANDHINAGAR 382325
Marine plywood
710
-
-
2010
7
7200028597
09/11/2015
MILAN JEWELLERS
PLOT C-4, SHOP NO.3,
GRAND CASTLE BUILDING,
KOPARLI
ROAD,GIDC, VAPI, VALSAD
396195
Gold and gold
alloys,
jewellery/artefacts
-
fineness and
marking -
1417
-
-
1999
8
7200028496
10/11/2015
SUVARNAKALA PVT. LTD.
101, NATIONAL PLAZA
OPP: SUPERMALL, C G ROAD
AHMEDABAD-380006
Silver and silver
alloys,
jewellery/artefacts
-
fineness and
marking
2112
-
-
2003
9
7200028395
16/11/2015
SHIVAM FOODS &
BEVERAGES
9,10 SOMESHWAR COMPLEX
KUNDAL VILLAGE,
MEHSANA, KADI 382715
Packaged
drinking water
(other than
packaged
natural mineral
water) -
14543
-
-
2004
2306
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
10
7200027191
19/11/2015
BOOST PLASTO TECHNICS
SURVEY NO.89/1, N,H, 14,
DEESA
HIGHWAY ROAD, OPP.HOTEL
GREEN
WOOD
BADARPURA(KODALA
TAL: PALANPUR 385001
Unplasticized pvc
screen and casing
pipes for
bore/tubewell
12818
-
-
2010
11
7200028698
20/11/2015
GEETA ENGINNERING CO
D/66, DIAMOND PARK,
NARODA GIDC ESTATE,
NARODA, AHMEDABAD
380025
Motors for
submersible
pumpsets -
9283
-
-
2013
12
7200028799
20/11/2015
PARNIL INDUSTRIES
PLOT NO.82/9/A, PHASE 1
GIDC VATVA, AHMEDABAD
382445
Single-phase
small ac and
universal electric
motors
996
-
-
2009
13
7200028803
20/11/2015
VIDYA PUMP INDUSTRIES
SHED NO.13, SYMPHONY
ESTATE
BEHIND INGERSOLE.PH-1,
GIDC
NARODA, AHMEDABAD
Submersible
pumpsets
8034
-
-
2002
14
7200029397
23/11/2015
BARODA AGRO CHEMICALS
LIMITED, SURVEY NO.40,
YASHKAMAL INDUSTRIAL
ESTATE, BASKA-TAJPURA
ROAD, V: PANELAV
TA: HALOL, PANCHMAHALS
389350
Mancozeb water
dispersible
powder
concentrates
8708
-
-
2006
15
7200029296
24/11/2015
SHREEJI BEVERAGES
C/41/191 KRISHNA INDL
ESTATE
OPP BIDC,GORWA ROAD
VADODARA 390016
Packaged
drinking water
(other than
packaged
natural mineral
water) -
14543
-
-
2004
16
7200029599
26/11/2015
UNNATI WIRE INDUSTRIES
SURVEY NO.37 & 38,
DEHGAM ROAD,
ZAROL, TAL: NADIAD,
KHEDA 387230
Mild steel wires,
formed wires and
tapes for
armouring of
cables
3975
-
-
1999
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938
2307
17
7200029805
26/11/2015
PARTH DECOR PVT LTD
PLOT NO.186, VILLAGE:
KUKAS
MEHSANA-VIJAPUR ROAD
NEAR SHOBHASAN CHAR
RASTA
MEHSANA 384001
Plywood for
general purposes
303
-
-
1989
18
7200028904
26/11/2015
NBE Motors Pvt Ltd
1 to 7,TIRUPATI ESTATE
OPP BOMBAY HOUSING
MILAN CINEMA
ROAD,SARASPUR
AHMADABAD 380024
Induction motors
- energy efficient,
three-phase,
squirrel cage -
12615
-
-
2011
19
7200029094
26/11/2015
HEER INDUSTRIES
11, REVABHAI ESTATE-2
BEHJIND PURCA DEEP
SOCIETY
OPP LAXAMBHAI ESTATE
AMARAIWADI, AHMEDABAD
380026
Submersible
pumpsets
8034
-
-
2002
20
7200029195
26/11/2015
PARSHW ENGINEERS
26 SWAMINARAYAN
ESTATE,
B/H CHIRAG DIAMOND,
ANIL STARCH ROAD,
BAPUNAGAR,AHMEDABAD
380025
Landing valves
5290
-
-
1993
21
7200029704
27/11/2015
PARTH DECOR PVT LTD
PLOT NO.186, VILLAGE:
KUKAS
MEHSANA-VIJAPUR ROAD
NEAR SHOBHASAN CHAR
RASTA
MEHSANA 384001
Wooden flush
door shutters
(solid core type):
2202
1
-
1999
22
7200029498
30/11/2015
LOKHANDWALA CEMENT
PRODUCTS
S NO.682/P,BESIDE GRAM
BHARTI
SCHOOL, OPP.GOCHAR,
THAKOR VAS, VANCHH GAM
Tal:DASKROI, AHMEDABAD
382449
Precast concrete
manhole cover
and frame -
12592
-
-
2002
2308
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
23
7200030281
30/11/2015
MALABAR GOLD PVT LTD
SHOP NO.101 AND 201,
1ST AND 2ND FLOOR
KPPLATINA, OPP PIZZA
HUT, RACE COURSE CIRCLE
VADODARA 39007
Gold and gold
alloys,
jewellery/artefacts
-
fineness and
marking -
1417
-
-
1999
[No. CMD/13:11]
Dr. S. L. PALKAR, Scientist ‘F’ & Head
ubZ fnYyh] 25 vizSy] 2016
dk-vk- 1033-—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks (izek.ku) fofu;e 1988 ds fofu;e (5) ds mifofu;e (6) ds vuqlj.k esa
Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks ,rn~}kjk vf/klwfpr djrk gS fd fuEu fooj.k okys ykblsalksa dks muds vkxs n”kkZ;h xbZ rkjh[k ls
jn~n/LFkfxr dj fn;k x;k gS :-
vu
vu
vu
vuqlwph
lwph
lwph
lwph
dze
la[;k
Ykkblsal la[;k
lh,e/,y-
Ykkblsal/kkjh dk uke o Ikrk
Ykkblsal ds varxZr oLrq /izde
lEc}
Hkkjrh; ekud dk “kh"kZd
jn~n djus dh
frfFk
1
7200017895
मैसस& योको टोन कां:टन'टल िलिमटेड
सव नंबर. 785पी, कोठ, बागोदरा,
तारापुररोड, आरनेज ग<व के पास,
अहमदाबाद
आटोमो:टव िवहीकल- टयूबस फार
S यूमै:टक टायर
आई एस 13098:2012
18/11/2015
[la- lh ,e Mh@13%13]
डॉ- एस- एल- पालकर] ] ] ] वै6ािनक ‘एफ’ एवं ;मुख
New Delhi, the 25th April, 2016
S.O. 1033.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (6) of the regulation 5 of the Bureau of Indian Standards
(Certification) Regulations 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies that the licences particulars of which
are given below have been cancelled with effect from the date indicated against each:
SCHEDULE
Sl.
No.
Licences
No.
CM/L-
Name & Address of the Licensee
Article/Process with
relevant Indian Standards
covered by the licence
cancelled
Date of
Cancellation
1
7200017895
M/s YOKOSTONE CONTINENTAL LIMITED
SURVEY NO. 785P, KOTH, BAGODRA
TARAPUR ROAD, NEAR ARNEJ VILLAGE
AHMEDABAD
Automotive Vehicles-
Tubes for pneumatic tyres
IS 13098:2012
18/11/2015
[No. CMD/13:13]
Dr. S. L. PALKAR, Scientist ‘F’ & Head
ubZ fnYyh] 20 ebZ] 2016
dk-vk- 1034-—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks (izek.ku) fofu;e 1988 ds fofu;e 6 ds mifofu;e (3) ds vuqlj.k esa Hkkjrh;
ekud C;wjks ,rn~}kjk uhps vuqlwph esa fn, x, mRikn dh eqgjkadu “kqYd vf/klwfpr djrk gS :-
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938
2309
vu
vu
vu
vuqlwph
lwph
lwph
lwph
Hkkjrh;
ekud
la-
Hkkx
vuqHkkx
o"kZ
mRikn
bdkbZ
U;wure eqgjkadu “kqYd
¼#-½
bdkbZ
nj
LySc 1
¼#-½
LySc esa
bdkbZ;ka
“ks"k
izpkyu
frfFk
o`gn
Lrj
,e,l,ebZ
ds fy,
73
&
&
2013
[kaMtk
Mkyus ds
fy, Mkej
& fof”kf"V
¼pkSFkk
iqujh{k.k½
eS- Vu
72000-00
58000-00
24-00
lHkh
& 18-05-2016
12591
&
&
2006
vrIr &
y?kqd`r
fo|qr
vi?kVuh
Øksfe;e
vkWDlkbM
& ysfir
bLikr
¼igyk
iqujh{k.k½
eS- Vu
46000-00
37000-00
5-40
lHkh
& 18-05-2016
16186
&
&
2014
oL=kfn &
50 fdxzk
[kk|kUu
iSd djus
ds fy,
gYds Hkkj
okys iVlu
ds cksjs &
fof”kf"V
eS- Vu
49000-00
40000-00
6-30
lHkh
& 18-05-2016
10065
&
&
1981
Hkquh gqbZ
eqxaQyh dh
xqByh
1 fdxzk
54000-00
44000-00
0-15
lHkh
& 18-05-2016
[lanHkZ la- lh ,e Mh&2@th&18]
lh- ds- egs”ojh] oSKkfud ^th* ,oa miegkfuns”kd ¼izek.ku½
New Delhi, the 20th May, 2016
S.O. 1034.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (3) of the regulation 6 of the Bureau of Indian Standards
(Certification) Regulations 1988, the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies the Marking fee for the product given
in the Schedule :
SCHEDULE
IS No.
Part
Sec
Year
Product
Units
Minimum Marking Fee (Rs.)
Unit
Rate
Slab-1
Fee
(Rs.)
Units
in
Slab-
1
Rema-
ining
Effective Date
Large Scale
MSME
73
-
-
2013
Paving Bitumen –
Specification
(Forth Revison)
One
MT
72000.00
78000.00
24.00
All
-
18.05.2016
2310
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
12591
-
-
2006
Cold-Reduced
Electrolytic
Chromium/
chromium Oxide –
Coated Steel (First
Revison)
One
MT
46000.00
37000.00
5.40
All
-
18.05.2016
16186
-
-
2014
Textiles – Light
Weight Jute
Sacking Bags for
Packing 50 kg
Foodgrains -
Specification
One
MT
49000.00
40000.00
6.30
All
-
18.05.2016
10065
-
-
1981
Roasted Groundnut
(Peanut) Kernels
One
Kg
54000.00
44000.00
0.15
All
-
18.05.2016
[Ref. No. CMD-2/G-18]
C. K. MAHESHWARI, Scientist ‘G’ & DDG (Certification)
ubZ fnYyh] 24 ebZ] 2016
dk-vk- 1035-—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks (izek.ku) fofu;e 1988 ds fu;e 4 ds mifu;e (5) ds vuqlj.k esa Hkkjrh;
ekud C;wjks ,rn~}kjk vf/klwfpr djrk gS fd ftu ykblsalksa ds fooj.k uhps vuqlwph esa fn, x, gS] os Lohd`r dj fn, x,
gSa %
vuq
vuq
vuq
vuqlwph
lwph
lwph
lwph
Øe
la[;k
Ykkblsal
la[;k
Lohd`r djus
dh frfFk
o"kZ@ekg
Ykkblsal/kkjh dk uke
o Ikrk
Hkkjrh; ekud dk
“kh"kZd
Hkk ek
la[;k
Hkkx
vuq
o"kZ
1
7200015588
04/06/2015
जावेरी तथा कंपनी
(गुजरात)एल एल पी
13 बी नाध नंबर
285/288, लाट नंबर
9 S यू नंबर 2349,
जावेरी हाउस, आई
डी बी आई ब'क के
पास, गोड डोड रोड
अथवालाlस, सूरत
395007
वण& तथा वण& धातु*
के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी
शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन
1417
-
-
1999
2
7200015891
08/06/2015
आभूषण,
कृ@ णा एसटेट के
सामने, कृ@ णानगर
रोड, नरोडा रोड,
अहदाबाद 382345
वण& तथा वण& धातु*
के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी
शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन
1417
-
-
1999
3
7200015992
10/06/2015
एरोयो एंटर;ाईस
सव नंबर 9, लाट नंबर
10, 11, 2,14, 15
साई कृपा इंडि6यल
एसटेट, अंजाना,
सूरत 395002
पैकेजबंद
पेयजल (अदर दैन
पैकेजड नेचुरल िमनरल
वाटर)
14543
-
-
2004
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938
2311
4
7200016085
10/06/2015
नवपाड केबल
50, ितhपित एसटेट,
मुS नी मिजद के
पास , सरसपुर,
अहमदाबाद 380018
पी वी सी इंसूले:टड
केबल
694
-
-
1990
5
7200015790
10/06/2015
िववान टीलस ;ा
िलिमटेड
यूनीमाक& रैमेिडस के
सामने, केराला के
पास, जी आई डी सी,
केराला,
बावला,अहमदाबाद
टील फार जनरल
टकचरल परपस
2062
-
-
2011
6
7200016388
10/06/2015
:रवर िबवरेिजस,
बी/20, अट:रया
िबजनेस जोन िजCनग
;ेस बी आर टी एस
बस ट'ड अरCवद िमल
कंपाउंड के सामने,
मैमको कालूपुर रोड,
नरोडा रोड
अहमदाबाद 382330
पैकेजबंद
पेयजल (अदर दैन
पैकेजड नेचुरल िमनरल
वाटर)
14543
-
-
2004
7
7200016287
15/06/2015
h_ा डायमंडस तथा
जवैलरी
यू -11, जोली शॉCपग
पाlट, गोड डोड रोड
सूरत-395007
वण& तथा वण& धातु*
के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी
शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन
1417
-
-
1999
8
7200016691
15/06/2015
डी आर जवैलस&
3,4 मंगलदास शॉCपग
स'टर, O, कमल पाक&
सोसाइटी के पीछे,
र'डर
पी ओ सूरत 390005
वण& तथा वण& धातु*
के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी
शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन
1417
-
-
1999
9
7200017390
15/06/2015
अ>र इंड 6ीज
38, कृ@ णा एसटेट,
बी ओ सी गैस के
पीछे, पS ना एसटेट
रोड, सोनी कA चाली
के पास रिखयाल,
ओढव, अहमदाबाद
Cसगल फेस माल ए सी
तथा यूिनवस&ल
इलैि6क मोटस&
996
-
-
2009
10
7200016186
16/06/2015
धीरज पाली ला ट
6, ;ाथ&ना एसटेट,
ओढव फायर टेशन के
पीछे, अहमदाबाद
382841
इरीगेशन इ यूपम'ट –
रोटे9टग ;ीलंकर पाट&
1 िडजाईन तथा
ओपरे7 नल :रकवायरम'ट
12232
1
-
1996
11
7200016792
17/06/2015
डी टी जवैलस&
वण& तथा वण& धातु*
के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी
1417
-
-
1999
2312
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
3-4153 बी,
बुंदेलुवाड, भागल
लाड शेरी, पहली
मंिजल,सूरत
395003
शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन
12
7200016893
17/06/2015
जावेरी तथा कंपनी
(गुजरात)एल एल पी
10 इसकान स'टर,
सैटेलाईट रोड,
जोधपुर, अहमदाबाद
380015
वण& तथा वण& धातु*
के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी
शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन
1417
-
-
1999
13
7200017289
17/06/2015
पूजा इंिजिनयं9रग
वकस&
191, शंकर एसटेट,
सूरेिलया रोड के पास,
रेवाभाई एसटेट के
पास, अमराईवाडी,
अहमदाबाद
380026
ओपनवैल सबमKसबल
पJ पसैट
14220
-
-
1994
14
7200016489
17/06/2015
ओम माकाnडे7 वर
जवैलस&,
एम यू नंबर.4/392,
छोटा बाजार,
अंकले7 वर,िडि6कट
भाhच 393001
वण& तथा वण& धातु*
के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी
शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन -
1417
-
-
1999
15
7200016590
19/06/2015
ज'सन िवनीयर लाई
िबपीको इंड 6ीज के
सामने, िबलीमोरा
िचखली
रोड, एट नंदार>ा,
नवसारी, िबलीमोरा
396325
लाईवुड फार जनरल
परपस
303
-
-
1989
16
7200016994
19/06/2015
गुजरात रा8फया
इंड 6ीज िलिमटेड,
455, सांतेज वडसर
रोड, ग<व सांतेज, ता
कलोल, गांधीनगर
382721
टै सटाईलस – हाई
ड'िसटी पॉलीथलीन
(एच डी पी ई)
/पाली;ापिलन (पी पी)
वोवन सैक फार पैWकग
50 8कला ाम/25
8कला ाम फुड ेन
14887
-
-
2014
17
7200017087
19/06/2015
गुजरात रा8फया
इंड 6ीज िलिमटेड,
455, सांतेज वडसर
रोड, ग<व सांतेज, ता
कलोल, गांधीनगर
382721
ए ो टैकसटाईल- हाई
ड'िसटी पालीथलीन
(एच डी पी ई) वोवन
बैडस फार वैनीकलचर
15907
-
-
2010
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938
2313
18
7200017188
19/06/2015
क1 पना जवैलस&
बि़ढयादेव मं8दर के
पास , गणेश चौक,
पादरा
वडोदरा
वण& तथा वण& धातु*
के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी
शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन
1417
-
-
1999
19
7200017491
22/06/2015
माईMा होम
एपलाईCसस
इंडि6यल लाट
नंबर. 03, jSosUयू
L लाक नंबर 1871,
खेरावा ( पुराना आर
एस नंबर 1705/2,
खेरवा संगलपुर रोड,
एट खेरवा, ता
मेहसाना, गुजरात
382711
रॉट एलयूिनयम
यू ट'िसल
1660
-
-
2009
20
7200017794
22/06/2015
योको टोन कांटीन'टल
िलिमटेड
सव नंबर. 785 पी ,
कोठ बागोदरा
तारापुर रोड,
आरनेज के पास,
अहमदाबाद
साईकल रबर टयूबस
2415
-
-
2004
21
7200017592
29/06/2015
नासा फायर
टैकनोलोजी िलिमटेड
24, Eीजी इंडि6यल
एसटेट
शांते7 वर महादेव के
पीछे, सोनी कA चाल
के पास, एन एच नंबर
8, रिखयाल,
अहमदाबाद 380023
पोटेबल फायर
ए स9टग7 र -
परफारम'स तथा
कंस6कशन
15683
-
-
2006
22
7200017895
22/06/2015
योको टोन कांटीन'टल
िलिमटेड
सव नंबर. 785 पी,
कोठ बागोदरा
तारापुर रोड,
आरनेज के पास,
अहमदाबाद
ऑटोमो:टव िविहकल-
टयूबस फार S यूमै:टक
टायर
13098
-
-
2012
23
7200017996
29/06/2015
रामे7 वर जवैलस&
46, बी जी 6ेड स'टर,
पंचबटी,भाhच
392001
वण& तथा वण& धातु*
के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी
शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन
1417
-
-
1999
2314
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
24
7200017693
29/06/2015
मनोजकुमार
रमनलाल सोनी
शॉप नंबर .37/1/2,
साकडीशेरी के सामने,
मानेक चौक,
अहमदाबाद
वण& तथा वण& धातु*
के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी
शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन
1417
-
-
1999
[la- lh ,e Mh@13%11]
डॉ- एस- एल- पालकर] ] ] ] वै6ािनक ‘एफ’ एवं ;मुख
New Delhi, the 24th May, 2016
S.O. 1035.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (5) of the regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards(
Certification) Regulations 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars of
which are given in the following schedule:
SCHEDULE
Sl.
No.
Licences
No.
Grant Date
Name & Address of the party
Title of the
Standard
IS
No.
Part
Sec
Year
1
7200015588
04/06/2015
ZAVERI AND
COMPANY(GUJARAT) LLP
13 B NONDH NO 285/288,
PLOT NO 9 NEW NO 2349,
ZAVERI HOUSE NEAR IDBI
BANK, GHOD DOD ROAD
ATHWALINES SURAT 395007
Gold and gold
alloys, jewellery/
artefacts -
fineness and
marking -
1417
-
-
1999
2
7200015891
08/06/2015
ABHUSHAN
OPP KRISHNA ESTATE
KRISHNANAGAR ROAD,
NARODA ROAD
Ahmedabad 382345
Gold and gold
alloys,
jewellery/artefacts
-
fineness and
marking -
1417
-
-
1999
3
7200015992
10/06/2015
ARROYO ENTERPRISE
SURVEY NO 9
PLOT NO. 10, 11, 12,14, 15
SAI KRUPA INDUSTRIAL
ESTATE
ANJANA,Surat 395002
Packaged
drinking water
(other than
packaged
natural mineral
water)
14543
-
-
2004
4
7200016085
10/06/2015
NAVPAD CABLE
50, TIRUPATI ESTATE,
NEAR MUNI MASJID
SARASPUR, AHMEDABAD
380018
Pvc insulated
cables
694
-
-
1990
5
7200015790
10/06/2015
VIVAN STEELS PVT LTD
OPPOSITE UNIMARK
REMEDIES
NEAR KERALA GIDC,
KERALA
BAVLA, AHMEDABAD
Steel for general
structural
purposes -
2062
-
-
2011
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938
2315
6
7200016388
10/06/2015
RIVER BEVERAGES
B/20, ATRIA BUSINESS ZONE
JINNING PRESS BRTS BUS
STAND
OPP. ARVIND MILL
COMPOUND
MEMCO-KALUPUR ROAD,
NARODA ROAD,Ahmedabad
382330
Packaged
drinking water
(other than
packaged
natural mineral
water)
14543
-
-
2004
7
7200016287
15/06/2015
RUDRA DIAMONDS &
JEWELLERY
U-11, JOLLY SHOPPING
POINT, GHOD-DOD ROAD
SURAT-395007
Gold and gold
alloys, jewellery/
artefacts -
fineness and
marking -
1417
-
-
1999
8
7200016691
15/06/2015
D R JEWELLERS
3,4 MANGALDAS SHOPPING
CENTRE
O, BEHIND KAMAL PARK
SOCIETY,
RANDER P O SURAT 390005
Gold and gold
alloys, jewellery/
artefacts -
fineness and
marking -
1417
-
-
1999
9
7200017390
15/06/2015
AKSHAR INDUSTRIES
38, KRISHNA ESTATE
BEHIND B.O.C GAS
PANNA ESTATE ROAD
NEAR SONI-NI-CHALI
RAKHIAL, ODHAV
AHMEDABAD
Single-phase
small ac and
universal electric
motors
996
-
-
2009
10
7200016186
16/06/2015
DHIRAJ POLI PLAST
6, PRATHANA ESTATE
BEHIND ODHAV FIRE
STATION
AHMEDABAD 382841
Irrigation
equipment -
rotating sprinkler:
part
1 design and
operational
requirements
12232
1
-
1996
11
7200016792
17/06/2015
D T JEWELLERS
3-4153 B,
BUNDELUWAD, BHAGAL
LAD SERI, IST FLOOR, SURAT
395003
Gold and gold
alloys,
jewellery/artefacts
-
fineness and
marking -
1417
-
-
1999
12
7200016893
17/06/2015
ZAVERI AND
COMPANY(GUJARAT)
LLP
10 ISHCON CENTRE,
SATELLITE ROAD
JODHPUR, AHMEDABAD
380015
Gold and gold
alloys, jewellery/
artefacts -
fineness and
marking -
1417
-
-
1999
13
7200017289
17/06/2015
POOJA ENGINEERING
WORKS
191, SHANKAR ESTATE
Openwell
submersible
pumpsets -
14220
-
-
1994
2316
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
NEAR SURELIYA ROAD
NEAR REVABHAI ESTATE
AMRAIWADI, AHMEDABAD
380026
14
7200016489
17/06/2015
OM MARKANDESHWAR
JEWELLERS
MU NO.4/392, CHAUTA
BAZAR,
ANKLESHWAR,DISTT
BHARUCH 393001
Gold and gold
alloys, jewellery/
artefacts -
fineness and
marking -
1417
-
-
1999
15
7200016590
19/06/2015
JENSON VENEERS PLY
OPP.BIPICO INDUSTRIES
BILIMORA-CHIKHLI ROAD
AT: NANDARKHA, Navsari
BILIMORA 396325
Plywood for
general purposes
303
-
-
1989
16
7200016994
19/06/2015
GUJARAT RAFFIA
INDUSTRIES LTD,
455,SANTEJ VADSAR ROAD,
Vill:SANTEJ, TALUKA KALOL
GANDHINAGAR 382721
Textiles — high
density
polyethylene
(hdpe) /
polypropylene
(pp) woven
sacksfor
packaging
of 50 kg food
grains —
14887
-
-
2014
17
7200017087
19/06/2015
GUJARAT RAFFIA
INDUSTRIES LIMITED
455, VADSAR ROAD, VI,
SANTEJ,
TA: KALOL,SABARKANTHA
KALOL 382721
Agro-textiles-
high density
polyethylene
(hdpe) woven
beds for
vermiculture
15907
-
-
2010
18
7200017188
19/06/2015
KALPANA JEWELLERS
NR BADYADEV
TEMPLE, GANESH
CHOWK,0,
PADRA, VADODARA
Gold and gold
alloys, jewellery/
artefacts -
fineness and
marking -
1417
-
-
1999
19
7200017491
22/06/2015
MICRA HOME
APPLIANCES
INDUSTRIAL PLOT NO. 03,
REVENUE
BLOCK NO 1871,
KHERAVA(OLD R S NO.
1705/2, KHERVA), KHERVA
SANGALPUR
ROAD,AT KHERVA TAL
MEHSANA
Gujarat 382711
Wrought
aluminium
utensils
1660
-
-
2009
20
7200017794
22/06/2015
YOKOSTONE CONTINENTAL
LIMITED
SURVEY NO. 785P, KOTH,
BAGODRA TARAPUR ROAD,
Cycle rubber
tubes -
2415
-
-
2004
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938
2317
NEAR ARNEJ, VILLAGE
AHMEDABAD
21
7200017592
29/06/2015
NASA FIRE TECHNOLOGY
LTD
24, SHREEJI INDUSTRIAL
ESTATE
B/H SHANTESHWAR
MAHADEV
NEAR SONI NI CHAL, N H NO
8
RAKHIAL AHMEDABAD
380023
Portable fire
extinguishers -
performance and
construction
15683
-
-
2006
22
7200017895
22/06/2015
YOKOSTONE CONTINENTAL
LIMITED
SURVEY NO. 785P, KOTH,
BAGODRA TARAPUR ROAD,
NEAR ARNEJ, VILLAGE
AHMEDABAD
Automotive
vehicles - tubes
for pneumatic
tyres
13098
-
-
2012
23
7200017996
29/06/2015
RAMESHWAR
JEWELLERS
46,B G TRADE CENTRE,
PANCHBATTI,
BHARUCH-392001
Gold and gold
alloys, jewellery/
artefacts -
fineness and
marking -
1417
-
-
1999
24
7200017693
29/06/2015
MANOJKUMAR
RAMANLAL SONI
SHOP NO.37/1/2, OPP
SAKDISHERI,
MANEKCHOWK,
AHMEDABAD
Gold and gold
alloys, jewellery/
artefacts -
fineness and
marking -
1417
-
-
1999
[No. CMD/13:11]
Dr. S. L. PALKAR, Scientist ‘F’ & Head
ubZ fnYyh] 24 ebZ] 2016
dk-vk- 1036-—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks (izek.ku) fofu;e 1988 ds fofu;e (5) ds mifofu;e (6) ds vuqlj.k esa
Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks ,rn~}kjk vf/klwfpr djrk gS fd fuEu fooj.k okys ykblsalksa dks muds vkxs n”kkZ;h xbZ rkjh[k ls
jn~n/LFkfxr dj fn;k x;k gS :-
vu
vu
vu
vuqlwph
lwph
lwph
lwph
dze
la[;k
Ykkblsal la[;k
lh,e/,y-
Ykkblsal/kkjh dk uke o Ikrk
Ykkblsal ds varxZr oLrq /izde
lEc) Hkkjrh; ekud dk
“kh"kZd
jn~n djus dh
frfFk
1
1988081
मैसस& 8दq या सिविचस ;ा िलिमटेड
C-1/174, जी आई डी सी, मेहसाना
384002
ि विचस फार डौमैिटक तथा
िसिमलर परपस
आई एस 3854 : 1997
01/06/2015
2318
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2
3866279
मैसस& मCह_ा इंड 6ीज
80,, 80/1, सांकर एसटेट, रेवाभाई
एसटेट के पीछे अमराईवाडी,
अहमदाबाद 380026
पी वी सी इंसूले:टड केबल
आई एस 694 : 1990
10/06/2015
[la- lh ,e Mh@13%13]
डॉ- एस- एल- पालकर] ] ] ] वै6ािनक ‘एफ’ एवं ;मुख
New Delhi, the 24th May, 2016
S.O. 1036.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (6) of the regulation 5 of the Bureau of Indian Standards
(Certification) Regulations 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies that the licences particulars of which
are given below have been cancelled with effect from the date indicated against each:
SCHEDULE
Sl.
No.
Licences
No.
CM/L-
Name & Address of the Licensee
Article/Process with
relevant Indian Standards
covered by the licence
cancelled
Date of
Cancellation
1
1988081
M/s DIVYA SWITCHES PVT.LTD.
C-1/174, GIDC, MAHESANA,
MAHESANA 384002
SWITCHES FOR
DOMESTIC
AND SIMILAR
PURPOSES
IS 3854 : 1997
01/06/2015
2
3866279
M/s MAHINDRA INDUSTRIES
80, 80/1, SANKAR ESTATE, BEHIND
REVABHAI ESTATE AMRAIWADI,
AHMADABAD
Distt : Ahmedabad
Gujarat,
380026
PVC INSULATED
CABLES
IS 694 : 1990
10/06/2015
[No. CMD/13:13]
Dr. S. L. PALKAR, Scientist ‘F’ & Head
ubZ fnYyh] 24 ebZ] 2016
dk-vk- 1037-—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks (izek.ku) fofu;e 1988 ds fu;e 4 ds mifu;e (5) ds vuqlj.k esa Hkkjrh;
ekud C;wjks ,rn~}kjk vf/klwfpr djrk gS fd ftu ykblsalksa ds fooj.k uhps vuqlwph esa fn, x, gS] os Lohd`r dj fn, x, gSa %
vuq
vuq
vuq
vuqlwph
lwph
lwph
lwph
Øe
la[;k
Ykkblsal
la[;k
Lohd`r djus
dh frfFk
o"kZ@ekg
Ykkblsal/kkjh dk uke
o Ikrk
Hkkjrh; ekud dk
“kh"kZd
Hkk ek
la[;k
Hkkx
vuq
o"kZ
1
7200018089
02/07/2015
ब'टले 8फ9टगस ;ा
िलिमटेड
लाट नंबर.ए/29,
वागत इंडि6यल
पाक&-1, कुलाड
धमाN वान रोड,
बै रोल (बजरंग)
ईरीगेशन इ यूपम'ट-
टेनर टाईप 8फलटस&
12785
-
-
1994
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938
2319
ता दसMाय,
अहमदाबाद 382430
2
7200018190
02/07/2015
ब'टले 8फ9टगस ;ा
िलिमटेड
लाट नंबर.ए/29,
वागत इंडि6यल
पाक&-1, कुलाड
धमाN वान रोड,
बै रोल(बजरंग)
ता दसMाय,
अहमदाबाद 382430
ईरीगेशन इ यूपम'ट-
हाईaोसाइकलोन
8फलटस&
14743
-
-
1999
3
7200018998
06/07/2015
पु@ पम जवैलस&
38, महाN मा गांधी
माक ट, मेन बाजार,
वापी टाउन, िड
वलसाद, वापी
396191
वण& तथा वण& धातु*
के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी
शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन
1417
-
-
1999
4
7200018291
07/07/2015
फलोकैम पोली ला ट
;ा िलिमटेड
लाट नंबर. ए-44,
वागत इंडि6यल
पाक&,, कुजाड बैकरोल
रोड, गांव बाकरोल,
बजरंग,ता दसMाय,
अहमदाबाद 382430
लो:रने:टड पी वी सी
पाईपस फार पोटेबल
हाट तथा को1 ड वाटर
िडि6L यूशन सपलाईस
15778
-
-
2007
5
7200018594
07/07/2015
सेजल Q वैलस&
यू जी 4-5 रंगीला
पाक&, गोड डोड रोड ,
सूरत 395003
वण& तथा वण& धातु*
के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी
शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन
1417
-
-
1999
6
7200018392
08/07/2015
जे एस फुड तथा
िबवरेिजस
लाट नंबर.19. िसटी
सव नंबर. 3813,
मीरा सोसाइटी बंगला
ए:रया, कुबेर नगर,
अहमदाबाद
382340
पैकेजबंद
पेयजल (अदर दैन
पैकेजड नेचुरल िमनरल
वाटर)
14543
-
-
2004
7
7200018493
13/07/2015
िमलेिनयम इंटरने7 नल
लाट नंबर. 5/82,
यूरेश नगर, बादर
लाजा के पीछे, रै ट
तथा राइड होटल के
पैकेजबंद
पेयजल (अदर दैन
पैकेजड नेचुरल िमनरल
वाटर)
14543
-
-
2004
2320
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
पीछे, मनपसंद पाल&र
के सामने, सरखेज रोड
अहमदाबाद 380055
8
7200018695
13/07/2015
के आर संस(एएचडी)
1, अिभषेक
काJ पलैकस, टार
बाजार के सामने,
सैटेलाईट
अहमदाबाद 380015
वण& तथा वण& धातु*
के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी
शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन
1417
-
-
1999
9
7200018796
14/07/2015
कालीबाबू डायमkड
Q वैलस&
यू 8 धनल5 मी को ओ
हा,एस एल . 6 2213
टावर के पास,
नवसारी 396445
वण& तथा वण& धातु*
के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी
शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन
1417
-
-
1999
10
7200018897
16/07/2015
गीता इंिजिनय9रग
कJ पनी
डी/66, डायमंड पाक&,
नरोडा जी आई डी सी
एस् टेट, नरोडा,
अहमदाबाद 382330
सबमKसबल पJ पसैट
8034
-
-
2002
11
7200019091
20/07/2015
S यू लािसक टार
पोिलन,
लाट नंबर. 2214
तथा 2215,
जी आई डी सी,
अंबरग<व, वलसाद
396171
टै साटाईल टारपोिलन
मेड Tाम हाई डैनिसटी
पोलिथलीन वोवन
फैब:रक
7903
-
-
2011
12
7200019192
20/07/2015
बंसल िबC1डग
मै:ट:रयलस ;ा
िलिमटेड
एन एच नंबर.8,
मोती नारोली,सूरत
394110
;ीका ट कांMAट L लाकस
फार पेCवग
15658
-
-
2006
13
7200019596
23/07/2015
आभूषण जवैलस&
शॉप नंबर 28, ाम
पंचायत शॉCपग
स'टर, आरवाड,
पारडी, उडवाडा,
वलसाद 396185
वण& तथा वण& धातु*
के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी
शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन
1417
-
-
1999
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938
2321
14
7200019798
27/07/2015
कैरेट टाईलफाईन
जवैलरी ;ा िलिमटेड
फलैट नंबर . 202,
शॉपर लाजा 6,
मS यूिसपल मा& केट के
सामने, सी जी रोड,
नवरंगपुरा
अहमदाबाद 380009
वण& तथा वण& धातु*
के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी
शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन
1417
-
-
1999
15
7200019394
28/07/2015
माधव ए ो फुड
इंड 6ीज
सव नंबर. 44, एट पी
ओ अंबागाम, ता
बायड,िड साबरकांटा
383325
पैकेजबंद
पेयजल (अदर दैन
पैकेजड नेचुरल िमनरल
वाटर)
14543
-
-
2004
16
7200019495
28/07/2015
जैलको इलै 6ािनकस
;ा िलिमटेड
142, ग<व कारोली,
एट तथा ता कलोल
गांधीनगर 382721
ि विचस फार डौमैिटक
तथा िसिमलर परपस
3854
-
-
1997
17
7200019697
29/07/2015
Eी महावीर एकवा
L लाक नंबर. 246.
लाट नंबर. 11/28,
12, 12/बी,
कािवक नगर
इंडि6यल ए टेट
कारंज, ता मांडवी,
सूरत 394530
पैकेजबंद
पेयजल (अदर दैन
पैकेजड नेचुरल िमनरल
वाटर)
14543
-
-
2004
18
7200019899
29/07/2015
अकाईश ि;S टgग एs ड
टेशनरी
लाट नं 703/2,
जीआईडीसी ए टेट,
फेस 4, S यु जीईबी,
िवठल उiोग नगर,
अहमदाबाद, िजला :
आणंद 388121
पैकेजबंद
पेयजल (अदर दैन
पैकेजड नेचुरल िमनरल
वाटर)
14543
-
-
2004
19
7200019903
30/07/2015
अंगूठी जवैलस&
सी/10, ई7 वरचरण
काJ पलै स,
आलोक अपाट&म'ट के
सामने,जोधपुर
गाम, सैटेलाईट,
अहमदाबाद 380015
वण& तथा वण& धातु*
के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी
शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन
1417
-
-
1999
2322
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
20
7200019293
30/07/2015
आर एंड डी
मलटीपलस
(मैटल का ट) ;ा
िलिमटेड
लांट II, सव नंबर
304, बालडा,पारडी
वलसाद 396125
लूस वालव फार वाटर
व स& परपस (50 से
1200 एम एम साईज)
14846
-
-
2000
[la- lh ,e Mh@13%11]
डॉ- एस- एल- पालकर] ] ] ] वै6ािनक ‘एफ’ एवं ;मुख
New Delhi, the 24th May, 2016
S.O. 1037.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (5) of the regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards
(Certification) Regulations 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars of
which are given in the following schedule:
SCHEDULE
Sl.
No.
Licences
No.
Grant Date
Name & Address of the party
Title of the
Standard
IS
No.
Part
Sec
Year
1
7200018089
02/07/2015
BENTLAY FITTINGS PVT LTD
PLOT NO.A/29, SWAGAT
IND.PARK-1, KUJAD-
DHAMATVAN
ROAD, BAKROL(BUJRANG)
TAL:DASKROI, AHMEDABAD
382430
Irrigation
equipment -
strainer-type filters
12785
-
-
1994
2
7200018190
02/07/2015
BENTLAY FITTINGS PVT LTD
PLOT NO.A/29, SWAGAT
IND.PARK-1, KUJAD-
DHAMATVAN
ROAD, BAKROL(BUJRANG)
TAL:DASKROI, AHMEDABAD
382430
Irrigation
equipment –
hydrocyclone filters
14743
-
-
1999
3
7200018998
06/07/2015
PUSHPAM JEWELLERS
38, MAHATMA GANDHI MARKET
MAIN BAZAR,VAPI TOWN
DIST VALSAD, VAPI 396191
Gold and gold
alloys,
jewellery/artefacts -
fineness and
marking -
1417
-
-
1999
4
7200018291
07/07/2015
FLOWKEM POLYPLAST PVT
LIMITED
PLOT NO. A-44, SWAGAT
INDUSTRIAL PARK, KUJAD
BAKROL ROAD, VILLAGE
BAKROL,BUJRANG, TAL
DASKROI,
DISTT AHMEDABAD 382430
Chlorinated pvc
pipes for potable
hot and
cold water
distribution
supplies.
15778
-
-
2007
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938
2323
5
7200018594
07/07/2015
SEJAL JEWELLERS
U G 4-5 RANGILA PARK, GHOD
DOD ROAD , SURAT-395003
Gold and gold
alloys,
jewellery/artefacts -
fineness and
marking -
1417
-
-
1999
6
7200018392
08/07/2015
J S FOOD AND BEVERAGES
PLOT NO.19. CITY SURVEY NO.
3813, MEERA SOCIETY
BUNGLOW AREA,
KUBERNAGAR, AHMEDABAD
382340
Packaged drinking
water (other than
packaged
natural mineral
water)
14543
-
-
2004
7
7200018493
13/07/2015
MILLENNIUM INTERNATIONAL
PLOT NO. 5/82, QURESH
NAGAR, BEHIND BADAR PLAZA,
BEHIND REST & RIDE
HOTEL, OPP MANPASAND
PARLOUR,SARKHEJ ROAD
AHMEDABAD 380055
Packaged drinking
water (other than
packaged
natural mineral
water)
14543
-
-
2004
8
7200018695
13/07/2015
K R SONS (AHD)
1, ABHISHREE
COMPLEX,OPP STAR BAZAR
SETELLITE, AHMEDABAD 380015
Gold and gold
alloys,
jewellery/artefacts -
fineness and
marking -
1417
-
-
1999
9
7200018796
14/07/2015
KALIBABU DIAMOND JEWELS
U 8, DHANLAXMI CO H
S L. 6 2213
NEAR TOWER, NAVSARI 396445
Gold and gold
alloys,
jewellery/artefacts -
fineness and
marking -
1417
-
-
1999
10
7200018897
16/07/2015
GEETA ENGINEERING CO
D/66, DIAMOND PARK
NARODA GIDC ESTATE
NARODA, Ahmedabad 382330
Submersible
pumpsets -
8034
-
-
2002
11
7200019091
20/07/2015
NEW CLASSIC
TARPAULINE
PLOT NO. 2214& 2215,
GIDC, UMBERGAON
Valsad 396171
Textiles-tarpaulins
made from high
density
polyethylene woven
fabric
7903
-
-
2011
12
7200019192
20/07/2015
BANSAL BUILDING MATERIALS
PVT LTD
N. H. NO.8, MOTI NAROLI
SURAT, MOTI NAROLI- 394110
Precast concrete
blocks for paving
15658
-
-
2006
13
7200019596
23/07/2015
AABHUSHAN JEWELLERS
SHOP NO. 28, GRAMPANCHAYAT
SHOPPING CENTRE, ORWAD,
PARDI, UDWADA, VALSAD
396185
Gold and gold
alloys,
jewellery/artefacts -
fineness and
marking -
1417
-
-
1999
14
7200019798
27/07/2015
CARATSTYLE FINE JEWELLERY
PRIVATE LIMITED
FLAT NO. 202, SHOPPER PLAZA 6,
Gold and gold
alloys,
jewellery/artefacts -
1417
-
-
1999
2324
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
OPP MUNICIPAL MARKET, C G
ROAD,
NAVRANGPURA,AHMEDABAD
380009
fineness and
marking -
15
7200019394
28/07/2015
MADHAV AGRO FOOD
INDUSTRIES
SURVEY NO. 44, AT PO
AMBAGAM, TAL BAYAD, DISTT
SABARKANTHA, BAYAD 383325
Packaged drinking
water (other than
packaged
natural mineral
water)
14543
-
-
2004
16
7200019495
28/07/2015
GELCO ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD.
142, VILLAGE: KAROLI
AT & TAL: KALOL
GANDHINAGAR - 382721
Switches for
domestic and
similar purposes
3854
-
-
1997
17
7200019697
29/07/2015
SHREE MAHAVIR AQUA
BLOCK NO. 246. PLOT NO. 11/28,
12, 12/B,
KAVIK NAGAR INDL. ESTATE
KARANJ, TAL MANDVI
SURAT- 394530
Packaged drinking
water (other than
packaged
natural mineral
water)
14543
-
-
2004
18
7200019899
29/07/2015
AKAAISH PRINTING &
STATIONERY
PLOT NO.703/2, GIDC ESTATE
PHASE IV, NEW GEB, VITHAL
UDYOGNAGAR, ANAND-388121
Packaged drinking
water (other than
packaged
natural mineral
water)
14543
-
-
2004
19
7200019903
30/07/2015
ANGUTHI JEWELLERS
C/10, ISHWARCHARAN
COMPLEX
OPP ALOK APARTMENT,
JODHPUR
GAM ROAD SATELLITE
AHMEDABAD-380015
Gold and gold
alloys,
jewellery/artefacts -
fineness and
marking -
1417
-
-
1999
20
7200019293
30/07/2015
R&D MULTIPLES
(METAL CAST) PVT. LTD.
PLANT II, SURVEY
NO. 304, BALDA
PARDI, Valsad
PARDI, Gujarat-
396125
Sluice valve for
water works
purposes (50 to
1200 mm size) -
14846
-
-
2000
[No. CMD/13:11]
Dr. S. L. PALKAR, Scientist ‘F’ & Head
ubZ fnYyh] 24 ebZ] 2016
dk-vk- 1038-—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks (izek.ku) fofu;e 1988 ds fofu;e (5) ds mifofu;e (6) ds vuqlj.k esa
Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks ,rn~}kjk vf/klwfpr djrk gS fd fuEu fooj.k okys ykblsalksa dks muds vkxs n”kkZ;h xbZ rkjh[k ls
jn~n/LFkfxr dj fn;k x;k gS :-
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938
2325
vu
vu
vu
vuqlwph
lwph
lwph
lwph
dze
la[;k
Ykkblsal la[;k
lh,e/,y-
Ykkblsal/kkjh dk uke o Ikrk
Ykkblsal ds varxZr oLrq /izde
lEc}
Hkkjrh; ekud dk “kh"kZd
jn~n djus dh
frfFk
1
3891682
मैसस& अथ& ;ोड टस
लाट नंबर 5017, मेगमणी चोकडी के
पास, जी आईडी सी, अंकले7 वर,
िड भाhच-393002
Cसथै:टक फुड कलर ;ीपरेशन तथा
िम सचर
आई एस 5346 : 1994
30/07/2015
[la- lh,eMh@13%13]
डॉ- एस- एल- पालकर] ] ] ] वै6ािनक ‘एफ’ एवं ;मुख
New Delhi, the 24th May, 2016
S.O. 1038.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (6) of the regulation 5 of the Bureau of Indian Standards(
Certification) Regulations 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies that the licences particulars of which
are given below have been cancelled with effect from the date indicated against each:
SCHEDULE
Sl.
No.
Licences
No.
CM/L-
Name & Address of the Licensee
Article/Process with
relevant Indian Standards
covered by the licence
cancelled
Date of
Cancellation
1
3891682
M/s ARTH PRODUCTS
PLOT NO. 5017, NEAR MEGMANI CHOWKDI,
G.I.D.C. ANKLESHWAR,
ANKLESHWAR
Distt : Bharuch-393002
synthetic food colour -
preparations and
mixtures
IS 5346 : 1994
30/07/2015
[No. CMD/13:13]
Dr. S. L. PALKAR, Scientist ‘F’ & Head
ubZ fnYyh] 24 ebZ] 2016
dk-vk- 1039-—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks (izek.ku) fofu;e 1988 ds fu;e 4 ds mifu;e (5) ds vuqlj.k esa Hkkjrh;
ekud C;wjks ,rn~}kjk vf/klwfpr djrk gS fd ftu ykblsalksa ds fooj.k uhps vuqlwph esa fn, x, gS] os Lohd`r dj fn, x, gSa %
vuq
vuq
vuq
vuqlwph
lwph
lwph
lwph
Øe
la[;k
Ykkblsal
la[;k
Lohd`r djus
dh frfFk
o"kZ@ekg
Ykkblsal/kkjh dk uke
o Ikrk
Hkkjrh; ekud dk
“kh"kZd
Hkk ek
la[;k
Hkkx
vuq
o"kZ
1
7200020076
03/08/2015
मैगनम ए ी इ यूपम'ट
;ा. िलिमटेड
सव नंबर 16
पी2/पी1/पी1, ग<व
मालगाड
ता1 लुका: डीसा,
बनसकांटा-385535
ईरीगेशन इ यूपम'ट-
पालीथलीन पाईपस
फार इरीगेशन लेटरलस
12786
-
-
1989
2326
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2
7200020379
06/08/2015
आई Eी खोिडयार
जवैलस&
4, सuयोग अपाट&म'ट,
S यू सामा रोड,
आभूषण के
पास,चोकडी वडोदरा
वण& तथा वण& धातु*
के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी
शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन
1417
-
-
1999
3
7200020177
07/08/2015
गुजरात Mाफट
इंड 6ीज िलिमटेड
431, सांतेज वडसर
रोड, सांतेज
गांधीनगर, ता कलोल
382721
टै सटाईलस – हाई
ड'िसटी पॉलीथलीन
(एच डी पी ई)
/पाली;ापिलन (पी पी)
वोवन सैक फार पैWकग
50 8कला ाम/
25 8कला ाम फुड ेन
14887
-
-
2014
4
7200020278
07/08/2015
जानकA पJ पस
2, 7, कुमार
इंडि6यल एसटेट,
शायोना एसटेट के
पास, कृ@ णा
काJ पलै स के साथ,
नरोडा रोड
अहमदाबाद 380025
ओपनवैल सबमKसबल
पJ पसैट
14220
-
-
1994
5
7200020480
10/08/2015
साईकमल पैकेजड
CaWकग वाटर,
नवा रोड, खेरगाम, ता
खेरगाम, ता िचखली
नवसारी-396040
पैकेजबंद
पेयजल (अदर दैन
पैकेजड नेचुरल िमनरल
वाटर)
14543
-
-
2004
6
7200020581
11/08/2015
एईरा यूरो आटोमेशन
;ा. िलिमटेड
लाट नंबर 123,124,
एईरा एसटेट
सैकयू:रटी एसटेट के
पीछे, काशीराम
टै सटाईल िमल के
पास, नारोल रोड,
अहमदाबाद-
382405
ए सपलोिसव
एटमास8फयस& पाट& 1
इकयूपम'ट ;ोटै शन
बाई फलेम;ुफ
एनकलोसस& "डी"
60079
1
-
2006
7
7200020783
11/08/2015
इंटरगो1 ड जैJ स ;ा
िलिमटेड
ओरा शिF िनवास,
वािसतक Mास
रोड,सी जी रोड
नवरंगपुरा,
अहमदाबाद-380009
वण& तथा वण& धातु*
के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी
शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन
1417
-
-
1999
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938
2327
8
7200020884
11/08/2015
इंटरगो1 ड जैJ स ;ा.
िलिमटेड
एल जी -बी, जी-बी,
वै ट 8फलड माल,
सूया&8करण काJ पलैकस
के सामने, गोड डोड
रोड, सूरत- 395001
वण& तथा वण& धातु*
के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी
शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन
1417
-
-
1999
9
7200021078
11/08/2015
पारी ए ो त था
एलाईड इंड 6ीज
172, जी आई डी सी
एसटेट, नरोडा
अहमदाबाद-382330
टील फार जनरल
टकचल& परपस
2062
-
-
2011
10
7200020682
12/08/2015
संगीर लािटक ;ा.
िलिमटेड
सव 146/पी2, रेमंड
िलिमटेड के पास, ग<व
मोतीवाड, वलसाद,
ता. पारडी -396125
पालीथलीन पाईपस
फार दा सपलाई आफ
गैिसयस फयूलस
14885
-
-
2001
11
7200021280
17/08/2015
;कृित टीलस ;ा.
िलिमटेड
सव नंबर 823,
राजोडा, अहमदाबाद
राजकोट हाइवे के
पास, ता बावला,
अहमदाबाद-382220
यू पी वी सी पाइप फार
पोटेबल वाटर
सपलाईस-
4985
-
-
2000
12
7200021381
19/08/2015
पावर व1 ड
इलै 6ािनकस
96, महाल5 मी
एसटेट, भा4 योदया के
सामने,
होटल सरखेज सानंद
रोड, सरखेज,
अहमदाबाद-382210
िमनी डोमैिटक वाटर
हीटर फार यूस वीद एल
पी जी
15558
-
-
2005
13
7200021179
19/08/2015
नेटा8फम इरीगेशन
इंिडया ;ा. िलिमटेड
268-270 & 271-
बी, जी आई डी सी.
मंजूसर,सावली
वडोदरा-391775
फ टलाईजर तथा
कैिमकल इनजै टर
िस टम
14483
1
-
1997
14
7200020985
19/08/2015
कृ@ णा एकवा
लाट नंबर.8, आनंद
पैकेजबंद यजल (अदर
दैन पैकेजड नेचुरल
िमनरल वाटर)
14543
-
-
2004
2328
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
वाडी, राबी
काJ पलै स के पीछे,
संतादेवी रोड,
नवसारी-396445
15
7200021785
19/08/2015
रािधका Q वैलस&
ए-13, माhित
काJ पलै स, एस जे
रोड,
िस2पुर, िड पाटन
384151
वण& तथा वण& धातु*
के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी
शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन
1417
-
-
1999
16
7200021482
24/08/2015
;कृित टीलस ;ा.
िलिमटेड
सव नंबर 823,
राजोडा, अहमदाबाद
राजकोट हाइवे के
पास, ता बावला,
अहमदाबाद-382220
सोलव'ट िसमkट फार यूस
िवद अन लािटसाईजड
पालीिवनाईल लोराइड
िटक पाईप तथा
8फ9टग
14182
-
-
1994
17
7200021583
24/08/2015
;कृित टीलस ;ा.
िलिमटेड
सव नंबर 823,
राजोडा, अहमदाबाद
राजकोट हाइवे के
पास, ता बावला,
अहमदाबाद-382220
फैब:रके:टड पी वी सी
8फ9टगस फार पोटेबल
वाटर स लाईस
10124
2
-
2009
18
7200021684
25/08/2015
Eी राधे िबवरेिजस
353/74, िवजय
इंडि6यल एसटेट
िभ>ुक गृह के पीछे,
ओढव, अहमदाबाद-
382415
पैकेजबंद
पेयजल (अदर दैन
पैकेजड नेचुरल िमनरल
वाटर)
14543
-
-
2004
19
7200021987
27/08/2015
नवदीप Q वैलस&
6/450-1,
कािचयावाड ना
नाका,अहमदाबाद
वाडी बाजार, खेडा-
387001
वण& तथा वण& धातु*
के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी
शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन
1417
-
-
1999
20
7200022080
27/08/2015
पारीख Q वैलस&
8/डी एच/1565/
66/67, अमदावाडी
बाजार, निडयाय,
खेडा- 387001
वण& तथा वण& धातु*
के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी
शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन
1417
-
-
1999
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938
2329
21
7200022181
31/08/2015
एन आर अ वाल
इंड 6ीज िलिमटेड
यूिनट-II, लाट
नंबर.1, फ ट फेस, जी
आई डी सी, वलसाद,
वापी -396195
राइ9टग तथा Cप9टग
पेपर
1848
-
-
2007
22
7200022383
31/08/2015
सुरभी Q वैलस&
14 वैभव काJ पलै स,
गायIी मं8दर रोड
डीसा -385535
वण& तथा वण& धातु*
के आभूषण/ िश1 पकारी
शु2ता एवं मुहरांकन
1417
-
-
1999
23
7200021886
31/08/2015
आर वी ए वा
एस आर नंबर 115,
एट: कनकपुरा
देवपुरा, ता िवजापुर,
मेहसाना, िवजापुर-
382870
पैकेजबंद
पेयजल (अदर दैन
पैकेजड नेचुरल िमनरल
वाटर)
14543
-
-
2004
[la- lh,eMh@13%11]
डॉ- एस- एल- पालकर] ] ] ] वैvािनक ^एफ* एवं ;मुख
New Delhi, the 24th May, 2016
S.O. 1039.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (5) of the regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards
(Certification) Regulations 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars of
which are given in the following schedule:
SCHEDULE
Sl.
No.
Licences
No.
Grant Date
Name & Address of the party
Title of the
Standard
IS
No.
Part
Sec
Year
1
7200020076
03/08/2015
MAGNUM AGRI EQUIPMENT PVT
LTD
SURVEY NO.16P2/P1/P1, VILLAGE:
MALGADH
TALUKA:DEESA,BANASKANTHA-
385535
Irrigation
equipment -
polyethylene pipes
for
irrigation laterals
12786
-
-
1989
2
7200020379
06/08/2015
AAI SHREE KHODIYAR
JEWELLERS
4, SAHUOG APARTMENT, NEW
SAMA ROAD,
NEAR ABHUSHAN ,
CHOKDI,VADODARA
Gold and gold
alloys,
jewellery/artefacts -
fineness and
marking -
1417
-
-
1999
3
7200020177
07/08/2015
GUJARAT CRAFT INDUSTRIES
LIMITED
431,SANTEJ- VADSAR
ROAD,SANTEJ,
GANDHINAGAR, TAL: KALOL-
382721
Textiles — high
density
polyethylene (hdpe)
/ polypropylene
(pp) woven sacks
14887
-
-
2014
2330
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
4
7200020278
07/08/2015
JANKI PUMPS
2, 7, KUMAR INDUSTRIAL
ESTATE, NEAR SHAYONA
ESTATE, B/S KRISHNA
COMPLEX, NARODA
ROAD.AHMEDABAD 380025
Openwell
submersible
pumpsets -
14220
-
-
1994
5
7200020480
10/08/2015
SAIKAMAL PACKAGED
DRINKING WATER, NAVA ROAD
KHERGAM,TAL CHIKHLI
Navsari 396040
Packaged drinking
water (other than
packaged
natural mineral
water)
14543
-
-
2004
6
7200020581
11/08/2015
AIRA EURO AUTOMATION PVT
LTD
PLOT NO.123,124, AIRA ESTATE
BEHIND SECURITY ESTATE
NEAR KASHIRAM TEXTILE MILL
NAROL ROAD AHMEDABAD
382405
Explosive
atmospheres part 11
equipment
protection by
intrinsic safety "i"
60079
1
-
2006
7
7200020783
11/08/2015
INTERGOLD GEMS PVT LTD
ORRA-SHAKTI NIWAS
SWASTIK CROSS ROAD, C G
ROAD,
NAVRANGPURA, Ahmedabad
380009
Gold and gold
alloys,
jewellery/artefacts -
fineness and
marking -
1417
-
-
1999
8
7200020884
11/08/2015
INTERGOLD GEMS PVT LTD
LG-B, G-B, WEST FIELD MALL,
OPP SURYAKIRAN COMPLEX
GHOD DOD ROAD, SURAT 395001
Gold and gold
alloys,
jewellery/artefacts -
fineness and
marking -
1417
-
-
1999
9
7200021078
11/08/2015
PAARI AGRO & ALLIED
INDUSTRIES
172, GIDC ESTATE, NARODA
AHMEDABAD 382330
Steel for general
structural purposes -
2062
-
-
2011
10
7200020682
12/08/2015
SANGIR PLASTIC PRIVATE
LIMITED
SURVEY 146/P2, NEAR RAYMOND
LTD,
VILLAGE: MOTIWADA,VALSAD
TAL: PARDI 396125
Polyethylene pipes
for the supply of
gaseous
fuels -
14885
-
-
2001
11
7200021280
17/08/2015
PRAKRITI STEELS PVT LTD
SURVEY NO.823, RAJODA,
NEAR AHMEDABAD-RAJKOT
HIGHWAY
TALUKA: BAVLA, AHMEDABAD
382220
Unplasticized pvc
pipes for potable
water
supplies -
4985
-
-
2000
12
7200021381
19/08/2015
POWER WORLD ELECTRONICS
96, MAHALAXMI ESTATE
OPP.BHAGYODAYA
Mini domestic
water heater for use
with lpg-
15558
-
-
2005
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938
2331
HOTEL SARKHEJ-SANAND ROAD
SARKHEJ AHMEDABAD 382210
13
7200021179
19/08/2015
NETAFIM IRRIGATION
INDIA PVT LTD
268-270 & 271-B,G.I.D.C.
MANJUSAR SAVLI. VADODARA
391775
Fertilizer and
chemical injector
system
14483
1
-
1997
14
7200020985
19/08/2015
KRISHA AQUA
PLOT NO.8, ANANDVADI,
BEHIND ROBY COMPLEX,
SANTADEVI ROAD,NAVSARI
NAVSARI 396445
Packaged drinking
water (other than
packaged
natural mineral
water)
14543
-
-
2004
15
7200021785
19/08/2015
RADHIKA JEWELLERS
A-13, MARUTI
COMPLEX, S J ROAD,
SIDHPUR, DIST-PATAN PATAN
384151
Gold and gold
alloys,
jewellery/artefacts -
fineness and
marking -
1417
-
-
1999
16
7200021482
24/08/2015
PRAKRITI STEELS PVT LTD
SURVEY NO.823, RAJODA,
NEAR AHMEDABAD-RAJKOT
HIGHWAY
TALUKA: BAVL, AHMEDABAD
382220
Solvent cement for
use with
unplasticized
polyvinylchloride
plastic pipe and
fittings
14182
-
-
1994
17
7200021583
24/08/2015
PRAKRITI STEELS PVT LTD
SURVEY NO.823, RAJODA,
NEAR AHMEDABAD-RAJKOT
HIGHWAY
TALUKA: BAVL, AHMEDABAD
382220
Fabricated pvc
fittings for potable
water
supplies
10124
2
-
2009
18
7200021684
25/08/2015
SHREE RADHE BEVERAGES
353/74, VIJAY IND ESTATE
BEIND BIKSHUK GRUH
ODHAV, AHMEDABAD 382415
Packaged drinking
water (other than
packaged
natural mineral
water)
14543
-
-
2004
19
7200021987
27/08/2015
NAVDEEP JEWELLERS
6/450-1, KACHIYAVAD NA NAKA
AMDAVADI BAZAR
KHEDA 387001
Gold and gold
alloys,
jewellery/artefacts -
fineness and
marking -
1417
-
-
1999
20
7200022080
27/08/2015
PARIKH JEWELS
8/DH/1565/66/67,
AMDAVADI BAZAR,
NADIAD, KHEDA 387001
Gold and gold
alloys,
jewellery/artefacts -
fineness and
marking -
1417
-
-
1999
2332
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
21
7200022181
31/08/2015
N R AGARWAL INDUSTRIES LTD
UNIT-II, PLOT NO.1, 1ST PHASE,
GIDC
VALSAD
VAPI 396195
Writing and
printing paper
CHD
1848
-
-
2007
22
7200022383
31/08/2015
SURBHI JEWELLERS
14 VAIBHAV COMPLEX
GAYATRI MANDIR ROAD
DEESA-385535
Gold and gold
alloys,
jewellery/artefacts -
fineness and
marking -
1417
-
-
1999
23
7200021886
31/08/2015
R V AQUA
SR NO.115, AT: KANAKPURA
DEVPURA TAL: VIJAPUR
MEHSANA, VIJAPUR 382870
Packaged drinking
water (other than
packaged
natural mineral
water)
14543
-
-
2004
[No. CMD/13:11]
Dr. S. L. PALKAR, Scientist ‘F’ & Head
ubZ fnYyh] 24 ebZ] 2016
dk-vk- 1040-—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks (izek.ku) fofu;e 1988 ds fofu;e (5) ds mifofu;e (6) ds vuqlj.k esa
Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks ,rn~}kjk vf/klwfpr djrk gS fd fuEu fooj.k okys ykblsalksa dks muds vkxs n”kkZ;h xbZ rkjh[k ls
jn~n/LFkfxr dj fn;k x;k gS :-
vu
vu
vu
vuqlwph
lwph
lwph
lwph
dze
la[;k
Ykkblsal la[;k
lh,e/,y-
Ykkblsal/kkjh dk uke o Ikrk
Ykkblsal ds varxZr oLrq /izde
lEc)
Hkkjrh; ekud dk “kh"kZd
jn~n djus dh
frfFk
1
7200017794
मैसस& योको टोन कां:टन'टल िलिमटेड
सव नंबर. 785 पी, कोठ, बागोदरा,
तारापुर रोड, आरनेज के पास,
अहमदाबाद
साइ8कल रबर टयूबस
आई एस 2415:2004
20.08.2015
2
7200016994
मैसस& गुजरात रा8फया इंड 6ीज
िलिमटेड,
455, वडसर रोड, ग<व सांतेज, ता
कलोल,
गांधीनगर 382721
टै सटाईस- हाई डैिसटी पालीथलीन
(एच डी पी ई) पालीपरोपलीन
वोवन
आई एस 14887:2014
26.08.2015
[la- lh,eMh@13%13]
डॉ- एस- एल- पालकर] ] ] ] वैvािनक ^एफ* एवं ;मुख
New Delhi, the 24th May, 2016
S.O. 1040.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (6) of the regulation 5 of the Bureau of Indian Standards
(Certification) Regulations 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies that the licences particulars of which
are given below have been cancelled with effect from the date indicated against each:
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938
2333
SCHEDULE
Sl.
No.
Licences
No.
CM/L-
Name & Address of the Licensee
Article/Process with
relevant Indian Standards
covered by the licence
cancelled
Date of
Cancellation
1
7200017794
M/s YOKOSTONE CONTINENTAL LIMITED
SURVEY NO. 785P, KOTH, BAGODRA TARAPUR
ROAD, NEAR ARNEJ, VILLAGE AHMEDABAD ,
Distt : Ahmedabad
Cycle Rubber Tubes
IS 2415:2004
20.08.2015
2
7200016994
M/s GUJARAT RAFFIA INDUSTRIES LTD,
455,SANTEJ VADSAR ROAD, Vill:SANTEJ,
TALUKA KALOL,
KALOL
Distt : Gandhinagar 382721
Textiles-High density
polyethylene (hdpe)
polypropylene woven sacks
IS 14887:2014
26.08.2015
[No. CMD/13:13]
Dr. S. L. PALKAR, Scientist ‘F’ & Head
वा
वा
वा
वा य
य
य
य एवं परवार क" या
एवं परवार क" या
एवं परवार क" या
एवं परवार क" याण मंालय
ण मंालय
ण मंालय
ण मंालय
( वा
( वा
( वा
( वा य
य
य
य एवं परवार क या
एवं परवार क या
एवं परवार क या
एवं परवार क याण िवभाग)
ण िवभाग)
ण िवभाग)
ण िवभाग)
नई द ली, 16 मई, 2016
dk-vk- 1041-—जबक भारतीय आयुिव.ान प1रषद (संशोधन) अ> यादेश, 2013 क धारा 3क क उप-धारा (1)
Qारा द[ शिRय का योग करते Sए दनांक 6 नवम् बर, 2013 को भारतीय आयु\व.ान प1रषद का पुनग,ठन कया गया था;
और, जबक क% सरकार ने भारतीय आयु\व.ान प1रषद अिधिनयम, 1956 (1956 का 102) क धारा 3 क उप-
धारा (1) के खंड (ग) के अनुसरण म% पंजीकृत िचकB सा 4 नातक िनवा,चन :े( म% चुनाव करवाए हV तथा िन) न को इस
अिधसूचना के जारी होने क तारीख से 4 वष, के िलए भारतीय आयुिव.ान प1रषद के सद4 य के 5प म% िनवा,िचत कया गया
है।
अब, इसिलए, उG त अिधिनयम क धारा 3 क उप-धारा (1) के ावधान के अनुसरण म% क% सरकार एतद् Qारा
दनांक 9 जनवरी, 1960 को 4 वा4 _ य मं(ालय के ताB कािलक सा.आ. 138 म% भारत सरकार क अिधसूचना म% िन) न
संशोधन करती है, नामत: :-
भारत सरकार क अिधसूचना म% 4 वा4 _ य एवं प1रवार क याण मं(ालय के दनांक 6 नवंबर, 2013 के सा.आ. सं.
3324 (अ.) म%, अंितम िविa तथा इससे संबंिधत िविa के बाद िन) निलिखत को शािमल कया जाए, नामत:-
b.सं.
पंज़ीकृत िचकB सा 4 नातक
िनवा,चन :े( का नाम
िनवा,िचत सद4 य का िववरण
चुनाव का मा> यम
17.
मिणपुर
डा. िसनम राज% dसह, एम.सीएच (यूरोलॉजी),
एमएस, एमबीबीएस, ‘‘राजिनी’’ संगई,
dचगमेइरग पूव, इ) फाल मिणपुर- 795001
िनवा,िचत
[सं. वी.-11013/04/2015-एमईपी (भाग)]
अिमत िब4वास, अवर सिचव
2334
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
पाद ट& प
पाद ट& प
पाद ट& प
पाद ट& पणी:
णी:
णी:
णी:-
मूल अिधसूचना को दनांक 9 जनवरी, 1960 के सा.आ. सं. 138 के तहत भारत के राजप( म% कािशत
कया गया था त था इसम% अंितम संशोधन भारतीय आयु\व.ान प1रषद (संशोधन) िव[ीय अ> यादेश,
2013 (2013 का 11) Qारा कया गया था।
MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE
(Department of Health and Family Welfare)
New Delhi, the 16th May, 2016
S.O. 1041.— Whereas on 06th November, 2013, the Medical Council of India was re-constituted in exercise of
the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3A of the Indian Medical Council (Amendment) Ordinance, 2013;
And, whereas the Central Government, in pursuance of Clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Indian
Medical Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956) has conducted the election from the Registered Medical Graduate
Constituency and the following has been elected to be a member of the Medical Council of India for four years with
effect from the date of issue of this notification.
Now, therefore, in pursuance of the provision of sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, the Central
Government hereby makes the following amendment in the Notification of the Government of India in the then Ministry
of Health number S.O. 138 dated 9th January, 1960, namely:-
In the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Health & Family Welfare number
S.O. 3324(E) dated 06th November, 2013, after the last entry and entry relating thereto, the following shall be inserted,
namely:
S. No.
Name of the Registered Medical
Graduate Constituency
Details of the Elected Member
Mode of Election
17.
Manipur
Dr. Sinam Rajendra Singh, M.Ch
(Urology), MS, MBBS, “Rajprinee”
Sangai, Chingmeirong East, Imphal
Manipur-795001
Elected
[No.V.-11013/04/2015-MEP(Pt.)]
AMIT BISWAS, Under Secy.
Foot Note :
The principal notification was published in the Gazette of India vide number S.O. 138 dated the 9th
January, 1960 and was last amended vide Indian Medical Council (Amendment) Second Ordinance,
2013 (11 of 2013).
मानव संसाधन िवकास मंालय
मानव संसाधन िवकास मंालय
मानव संसाधन िवकास मंालय
मानव संसाधन िवकास मंालय
(उ च
उ च
उ च
उ चतर िश ा िवभाग
तर िश ा िवभाग
तर िश ा िवभाग
तर िश ा िवभाग)
(राजभाषा यूिनट
राजभाषा यूिनट
राजभाषा यूिनट
राजभाषा यूिनट)
नई द ली, 19 मई, 2016
dk-vk- 1042-—के ीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासकय योजन के िलए योग) िनयम, 1976 के िनयम 10
के उप-िनयम 4 के अनुसरण म%, मानव संसाधन िवकास मं(ालय (4 कूल िश:ा एवं सा:रता िवभाग) के अंतग,त िन) निलिखत
काया,लय को, ऐसे काया,लय के 5प म%, िजसके 80 ितशत से अिधक कम,चारी-वृ द ने िह दी का काय,साधक .ान ाg त कर
िलया है, अिधसूिचत करती है :-
1.
क% ीय िवhालय, बालीगंज,
बालीगंज मैदान कV प,
कोलकाता- 700019 (पिiम बंगाल)
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938
2335
2.
क% ीय िवhालय, मालदा,
पो4 ट– मिलहा, िजला– मालदा- 732102 (पिiम बंगाल)
3.
क% ीय िवhालय के.1र.पु.बल,
िजला– बj,मान, दुगा,पुर- 713214 (पिiम बंगाल)
4.
क% ीय िवhालय, बैरकपुर (वायुसेना 4 टेशन),
पो4 ट-बंगाल इनामेल, िजला-24 परगना (उB तर) -743122
(पिiम बंगाल)
5.
क% ीय िवhालय, बीरभूम जोलबारी कॉ) पलेG स,
िनकट नगरपािलका काया,लय, िसउड़ी बीरभूम - 731101
(पिiम बंगाल)
6.
क% ीय िवhालय, सालबनी,
पो4 ट – 1रबैनोमूिल,
िजला - मेदनीपुर (पिiम) 721132 (पिiम बंगाल)
7.
क% ीय िवhालय,
फोट,िविलयम, कोलकाता- 700021
[सं.11011-2/2015-रा.भा.ए.]
सुखबीर dसह संधु, संयुG त सिचव
MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT
(Department of Higher Education)
(O.L. UNIT)
New Delhi, the 19th May, 2016
S.O. 1042.—In pursuance of sub-rule (4) of rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for Official Purposes of
the Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government hereby notifies the following offices under the Ministry of Human
Resource Development, (Department of School Education & Literacy) as office, whose more than 80% members of the
staff have acquired working knowledge of Hindi.
1.
Kendriya Vidyalaya, Ballygunge,
Ballygunge Maidan Camp, Kolkata-700019 (West Bengal)
2.
Kendriya Vidyalaya, Malda, PO- Maliha,
Distt- Malda- 732102 (West Bengal)
3.
Kendriya Vidyalaya CRPF,
Dist- Burdwan, Durgapur-713214 (West Bengal)
4.
Kendriya Vidyalaya Barrackpore (AFS),
P.O. Bengal Enamel,
Dist- 24 Parganas (N) 743122 (West Bengal)
5.
Kendriya Vidyalaya, Birbhum Golbari Complex,
Near Municipality Office, Suri Birbhum - 731101
(West Bengal)
6.
Kendriya Vidyalaya Salboni, P.O.- RBNM
Dist – Medinipore (west) 721132, (West Bengal)
7.
Kendriya Vidyalaya, Fort William
Kolkata- 700021
[No. 11011-2/2015-O.L.U.]
SUKHBIR SINGH SANDHU, Jt. Secy.
2336
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
oL=k ea=kky;
ubZ fnYyh] 20 ebZ] 2016
dk-vk- 1043-—dsUnzh; ljdkj] (la?k ds 'kkldh; iz;kstuksa ds fy, iz;ksx) jktHkk"kk fu;e] 1976 ds fu;e 10 ds
mi&fu;e (4) ds vuqlj.k esa] oL=k ea=kky; ds varxZr vkus okys fuEufyf[kr dk;kZy;ksa dks ftlds 80% ls vf/d deZpkfj;ksa us fganh
dk dk;Zlk/d Kku izkIr dj fy;k gS] vfèklwfpr djrh gS %
1-
{ks=kh; dk;kZy;] dsaæh; js'ke cksMZ] 5oka ry] fodkl nhi] y[kuÅ&226001 (m-iz-)
2-
fiQUys feYl] us'kuy VsDlVkbYl dkiksZjs'ku fy-] vejkorh jksM] vpuiqj] ftyk vejkorh] fiu dksM 444805
(egkjk”Vª)
3-
jktuxj VsDlVkby feYl] us'kuy VsDlVkbYl dkiksZjs'ku fy-] mÙkj xqtjkr iVsy uxj lksLkkbVh ds lkeus] ckcqiqjk]
gfjiqjk] vlkjok] vgenkckn&380016 (xqtjkr)
¹la- bZ-&11016@01@2015&¯gnhº
xhrk ukjk;.k] la;qDr lfpo
MINISTRY OF TEXTILES
New Delhi, the 20th May, 2016
S.O. 1043.—In pursuance of sub-rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for the Official Purpose of
the Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government, hereby notify the following offices of the Ministry of Textiles, more
than 80% staff whereof have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi :
1.
Regional Office, Central Silk Board, 5th Floor, Vikas Deep, 22 Station Road, Lucknow-226001
(Uttar Pradesh)
2.
Finlay Mills, National Textiles Corporation Ltd., Amravati Road, Achalpur, District-Amravati,
Pin 444805 (Maharashtra)
3.
Rajnagar Textile Mills, National Textiles Corporation Ltd., Opp. Uttar Gujarat Patelnagar Society,
Babupura, Haripura, Asarwa, Ahmedabad-380016 (Gujarat).
[No. E.-11016/01/2015-Hindi]
GEETA NARAYAN, Jt. Secy.
;qok dk;ZØe vkSj [ksy ea=kky;
ubZ fnYyh] 18 ebZ] 2016
dk-vk- 1044-—dsUnzh; ljdkj] ,rn~}kjk jktHkk"kk (la?k ds 'kkldh; iz;kstuksa ds fy, iz;ksx) fu;e] 1976 ds fu;e 10 ds
mi&fu;e (4) ds vuqlj.k esa] ;qok dk;ZØe vkSj [ksy ea=kky; ds Lok;Ùk'kklh dk;kZy; Hkkjrh; [ksy izkf/dj.k] jktho xka/h mPp
f'k[kj izf'k{k.k dsaæ] f'kyk# (fg-iz)] ftlds 80% ls vf/d deZpkjh&oU`n us fganh dk dk;Zlk/d Kku izkIr dj fy;k gS] dks
vfèklwfpr djrh gS A
¹fe- la-&11011@02@2008&fg-,-º
,l- ,y- ehuk] mi lfpo
MINISTRY OF YOUTH AFFAIRS AND SPORTS
New Delhi, the 18th May, 2016
S.O. 1044.—In pursuance of sub-rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for the Official Purposes
of the Union) Rule, 1976, the Central Government, hereby notify Sports Authority of India, Rajiv Gandhi High Altitute
Training Centre, Shilaru (H.P.), an Autonomous office of Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports, whereof more than 80%
staff have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi.
[F. No. E-11011/02/2008-H.U.]
S. L. MEENA, Dy. Secy.
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938
2337
ubZ fnYyh] 18 ebZ] 2016
dk-vk- 1045-—dsUnzh; ljdkj] ,rn~}kjk jktHkk"kk (la?k ds 'kkldh; iz;kstuksa ds fy, iz;ksx) fu;e] 1976 ds fu;e 10 ds
mi&fu;e (4) ds vuqlj.k esa] ;qok dk;ZØe vkSj [ksy ea=kky; ds v/huLFk dk;kZy; jk"Vªh; lsok ;kstuk {ks=kh; funs'kky;] fnYyh
ftlds 80% ls vf/d deZpkjhoa`n us fganh dk dk;Zlk/d Kku izkIr dj fy;k gS] dks vfèklwfpr djrh gS A
¹fe- la- 11011@02@2008&fg-,-º
,l- ,y- ehuk] mi lfpo
New Delhi, the 18th May, 2016
S.O. 1045.—In pursuance of sub-rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for the Official Purposes
of the Union) Rule, 1976, the Central Government, hereby notify National Service Scheme Regional Directorate, Delhi,
a Subordinate office of Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports, whereof more than 80% staff have acquired the working
knowledge of Hindi.
[F. No. E-11011/02/2008-H.U.]
S. L. MEENA, Dy. Secy.
ubZ fnYyh] 18 ebZ] 2016
dk-vk- 1046-—dsUnzh; ljdkj] ,rn~}kjk jktHkk"kk (la?k ds 'kkldh; iz;kstuksa ds fy, iz;ksx) fu;e] 1976 ds fu;e 10 ds
mi&fu;e (4) ds vuqlj.k esa] ;qok dk;ZØe vkSj [ksy ea=kky; ds v/huLFk dk;kZy; jk"Vªh; lsok ;kstuk {ks=kh; funs'kky;] paMhx<+
ftlds 80% ls vf/d deZpkjhoa`n us fganh dk dk;Zlk/d Kku izkIr dj fy;k gS] dks vfèklwfpr djrh gS A
¹fe- la- 11011@02@2008&fg-,-º
,l- ,y- ehuk] mi lfpo
New Delhi, the 18th May, 2016
S.O. 1046.—In pursuance of sub-rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for the Official Purposes
of the Union) Rule, 1976, the Central Government, hereby notify National Service Scheme Regional Directorate,
Chandigarh, a Subordinate office of Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports, whereof more than 80% staff have acquired
the working knowledge of Hindi.
[F. No. E-11011/02/2008-H.U.]
S. L. MEENA, Dy. Secy.
ubZ fnYyh] 18 ebZ] 2016
dk-vk- 1047-—dsUnzh; ljdkj] ,rn~}kjk jktHkk"kk (la?k ds 'kkldh; iz;kstuksa ds fy, iz;ksx) fu;e] 1976 ds fu;e 10 ds
mi&fu;e (4) ds vuqlj.k esa] ;qok dk;ZØe vkSj [ksy ea=kky; ds v/huLFk dk;kZy; jk"Vªh; lsok ;kstuk {ks=kh; funs'kky;]
fr#ouUriqje ftlds 80% ls vf/d deZpkjhoa`n us fganh dk dk;Zlk/d Kku izkIr dj fy;k gS] dks vfèklwfpr djrh gS A
¹fe- la- 11011@02@2008&fg-,-º
,l- ,y- ehuk] mi lfpo
New Delhi, the 18th May, 2016
S.O. 1047.—In pursuance of sub-rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for the Official Purposes
of the Union) Rule, 1976, the Central Government, hereby notify National Service Scheme Regional Directorate,
Thiruvananthapuram, a Subordinate office of Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports, whereof more than 80% staff have
acquired the working knowledge of Hindi.
[F. No. E-11011/02/2008-H.U.]
S. L. MEENA, Dy. Secy.
ubZ fnYyh] 25 ebZ] 2016
dk-vk- 1048-—dsUnzh; ljdkj] ,rn~}kjk jktHkk"kk (la?k ds 'kkldh; iz;kstuksa ds fy, iz;ksx) fu;e] 1976 ds fu;e 10 ds
mi&fu;e (4) ds vuqlj.k esa] ;qok dk;ZØe vkSj [ksy ea=kky; ds Lok;Ùk'kklh dk;kZy;] usg: ;qok dsaæ] dsykax (ykgkSy Lihfr)] (fg-
iz-)] ftlds 80% ls vf/d deZpkjh&oU`n us fganh dk dk;Zlk/d Kku izkIr dj fy;k gS] dks vfèklwfpr djrh gS A
¹fe- la- 11011@02@2008&fg-,-º
,l- ,y- ehuk] mi lfpo
2338
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
New Delhi, the 25th May, 2016
S.O. 1048.—In pursuance of sub-rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for the Official Purposes
of the Union) Rule, 1976, the Central Government, hereby notify Nehru Yuva Kendra, Keylong, (Lahul Spiti) (H.P.), an
Autonomous office of Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports, whereof more than 80% staff have acquired the working
knowledge of Hindi.
[F. No. E-11011/02/2008-H.U.]
S. L. MEENA, Dy. Secy.
lapkj vkSj lwpuk izkS|ksfxdh ea=kky;
(bysDVªkWfudh vkSj lwpuk izkS|ksfxdh foHkkx)
ubZ fnYyh] 23 ebZ] 2016
dk-vk- 1049-—dsUnzh; ljdkj] ,rn~}kjk jktHkk"kk (la?k ds 'kkldh; iz;kstuksa ds fy, iz;ksx) fu;e] 1976 ds fu;e 10 ds
mi&fu;e (4) ds vuqlj.k esa] bysDVªkWfudh vkSj lwpuk izkS|ksfxdh foHkkx ds lac¼ dk;kZy; ekudhdj.k ijh{k.k rFkk xq.koÙkk izek.ku
funs'kky; ds xqokgkVh fLFkr v/huLFk dk;kZy;] bysDVªkWfudh ijh{k.k rFkk fodkl dsaæ] ftlds 80% ls vf/d deZpkfj;ksa us fganh dk
dk;Zlk/d Kku izkIr dj fy;k gS] dks vfèklwfpr djrh gS A
¹la- 7(2)@2005&fg-v-º
jktho dqekj] la;qDr lfpo
MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
(Department of Electronics and Information Technology)
New Delhi, the 23rd May, 2016
S.O. 1049.—In pursuance of sub-rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for the Official Purpose of
the Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government, hereby notifies the Electronics Test and Development Centre, a
subordinate office of the Standardisation Testing and Quality Certification Directorate, and attached office of the
Department of Electronics and Information Technology, located at Guwahati, whose more than 80% staff have acquired
the working knowledge of Hindi.
[No. 7(2)/2005-H.S.]
RAJIV KUMAR, Jt. Secy.
कोयला मंालय
कोयला मंालय
कोयला मंालय
कोयला मंालय
नई द ली, 25 मई, 2016
का
का
का
का.आ. 1050
. 1050
. 1050
. 1050.—के ीय सरकार, कोयला धारक :े( (अज,न और िवकास) अिधिनयम 1957 (1957 का 20)
(िजसे इसम% इसके पL चात् उG त अिधिनयम कहा गया है) क धारा 9 क उप-धारा (1) के अधीन जारी भारत के राजप(,
असाधारण, भाग ।।, खंड 3, उपखंड (ii), तारीख 8 फरवरी,2016 म% कािशत भारत सरकार के कोयला मं(ालय क
अिधसूचना Qारा का. आ. सं2 यांक 397(अ), तारीख 8 फरवरी, 2016 के काशन पर, उG त अिधसूचना से उपाबj
अनुसूची म% व\णत भूिम (िजसे इसम% इसके पL चात् उG त भूिम कहा गया है) और भूिम म% या उस पर के सभी अिधकार, उG त
अिधिनयम क धारा 10 क उप-धारा (1) के अधीन, सभी िव लंगम से मुG त होकर, आB यंितक 5प म% के ीय सरकार म%
िनिहत हो गए थे;
और, के ीय सरकार का यह समाधान हो गया है, क स%lल कोलफ mस िलिमटेड, रांची, (िजसे इसम% इसके
पL चात् सरकारी कंपनी कहा गया है), ऐसे िनबंधन और शतn का िज ह% के ीय सरकार इस िनिमB त अिधरोिपत करना
उिचत समझे, अनुपालन करने के िलये रजामंद हV ;
अत: अब, के ीय सरकार, कोयला धारक :े( (अज,न और िवकास) अिधिनयम 1957 क धारा 11 क उपधारा
(1) Qारा दB त शिG तय का योग करते Sए, यह िनदoश देती है, क उG त भूिम म% या उस पर के सभी अिधकार के ीय
सरकार म% इस कार िनिहत बने रहने के बजाए, 8 फरवरी, 2016 से िन) निलिखत िनबंधन और शतn के अधीन रहते Sए,
उG त सरकारी कंपनी म% िनिहत हो जाएंगे, अथा,त् -
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938
2339
1.
सरकारी कंपनी, उG त अिधिनयम के उपबंध के अधीन यथा अवधा1रत ितकर, p याज, नुकसािनय और वैसी ही
मद क बाबत् कए गए संदाय क के ीय सरकार को ितपू\त करेगी ;
2.
सरकारी क) पनी Qारा शत, (1) के अधीन के ीय सरकार को संदेय रकम का अवधारण करने के योजन के िलए
उG त अिधिनयम क धारा 14 के अधीन एक अिधकरण का गठन कया जाएगा और ऐसे कसी अिधकरण और
अिधकरण क सहायता के िलए िनयुG त q यिG तय के संबंध म% उपगत सभी q यय, सरकारी कंपनी Qारा वहन कए
जाrगे और इसी कार िनिहत उG त भूिम म% या उस पर के अिधकार के िलए या उनके संबंध म% अपील% आद सभी
िविधक काय,वािहय क बाबत् उपगत, सभी q यय भी, सरकारी कंपनी Qारा वहन कए जाएंगे ;
3.
सरकारी कंपनी, के ीय सरकार या उसके पदधा1रय क, ऐसे कसी अ य q यय के संबंध म% :ितपू\त करेगी, जो
इस कार िनिहत उG त भूिम म% या उस पर के अिधकार के बार% म%, के ीय सरकार या उसके पदधा1रय Qारा या
उनके िव5j क हH काय,वािहय के संबंध म% आवL यक हो ;
4.
सरकारी कंपनी को के ीय सरकार के पूव, अनुमोदन के िबना उG त भूिम को कसी अ य q यिG त को अंत1रत करने
क शिG त नहH होगी ; और
5.
सरकारी कंपनी, ऐसे िनदoश और शतn का पालन करेगी, जो के ीय सरकार Qारा,जब कभी आवL यक हो, उG त
भूिम के िविशs ट :े( के िलए दए जाएं या अिधरोिपत कए जाएं ।
[फा. सं. 43015/17/2014-पीआरआईडp यू-I]
सुजीत कुमार , अवर सिचव
MINISTRY OF COAL
New Delhi, the 25th May, 2016
S.O. 1050.—Whereas on the publication of the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Coal,
number S.O. 397 (E), dated the 8th February, 2016, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3,
Sub-section (ii), dated the 8th February, 2016, issued under sub-section (1) of section 9 of the Coal Bearing Areas
(Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 (20 of 1957) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), the land and all rights in
or over the land described in the Schedule appended to the said notification (hereinafter referred to as the said land) are
vested absolutely in the Central Government free from all encumbrances under sub-section (1) of section 10 of the said
Act;
And whereas, the Central Government is satisfied that the Central Coalfields Limited, Ranchi (hereinafter
referred to as the Government Company) is willing to comply with such terms and conditions as the Central Government
thinks fit to impose in this behalf;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 11 of the said Act, the Central
Government hereby directs that all rights in or over the said land so vested, shall, with effect from the 8th February,
2016, instead of continuing to so vest in the Central Government shall vest in the Government company, subject to the
following terms and conditions, namely:-
1. The Government Company shall reimburse to the Central Government all payments made in respect of
compensation, interest, damages, and the like, as determined under the provisions of the said Act;
2. A Tribunal shall be constituted under section 14 of the said Act, for the purpose of determining the amounts
payable to the Central Government by the said Government Company under condition (1) and all expenditure
incurred in connection with any such tribunal and persons appointed to assist the Tribunal shall be borne by the
said Government Company and similarly, all expenditure incurred in respect of all legal proceedings like
appeals, etc. for or in connection with the rights, in or over the said land, so vested, shall also be borne by the
Government Company;
3. The Government Company shall indemnify the Central Government or its officials against any other
expenditure that may be necessary in connection with any proceedings by or against the Central Government or
its officials regarding the aforesaid rights in or over the said land so vested;
4. The Government Company shall have no power to transfer the aforesaid rights in the said lands so vested, to
any other person without the prior approval of the Central Government; and
5. The Government Company shall abide by such directions and conditions as may be given or imposed by the
Central Government for particular areas of the said land as and when necessary.
[F. No. 43015/17/2014- PRIW-I]
SUJEET KUMAR, Under Secy.
2340
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Je ,oa jkstxkj ea=kky;
ubZ fnYyh] 2 ebZ] 2016
dk-vk- 1051-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj v'kksd
gksVy] ubZ fnYyh ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkj ds chp vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;&1] fnYyh ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 68@2012) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 28-04-
2016 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&42025@03@2016&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)]
Ikh- ds- os.kqxksiky] MsLd vf/dkjh
MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT
New Delhi, the 2nd May, 2016
S.O. 1051.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (I.D No. 68/2012) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-Cum-
Labour-Court No.-1, Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to
the management of the Ashok Hotel, New Delhi and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on
28.04.2016.
[No. L-42025/03/2016-IR (DU)]
P. K. VENUGOPAL, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
IN THE COURT OF SHRI AVTAR CHAND DOGRA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT NO.1, KARKARDOOMA COURT COMPLEX, DELHI
ID No. 68/2012
Shri Arjun Singh, through
The President
Ashok Hotel Mazdoor Janta Union,
Ashok Hotel Staff Quarter No.C-48-49,
50-B, Chanakyapuri,
New Delhi – 110 021
…Workman
Versus
The General Manager,
Ashok Hotel, 50-B,
Chanakyapuri,
Delhi 110 021
…Management
AWARD
Brief facts giving rise to the present case are that the workman herein directly raised a dispute before this
Tribunal under provisions of sub-section (2) of Section 2A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (in short the Act)
inasmuch as period of 45 days stood expired from the date of making his application before the Conciliation Officer and
no reference is required under the Act by the Tribunal from the appropriate Government after the said period.
2.
It is averred in the statement of claim that the workman herein, Shri Arjun Singh, was working in Ashok Hotel
since October 2006 to the satisfaction of the management of Ashok Hotel. There was no complaint against the said
workman and their group leader has also appreciated his services. The workman herein was working in the premises of
Ashok Hotel against permanent post lying vacant in Ashok Hotel. Officials of Ashok Hotel used to assign the job or
work to the workman herein and also used to mark his attendance and supervision of the work/job was under the control
of management of Ashok Hotel.
3.
It is further the case of the workman herein that he has filed proper applications and was also interviewed by the
officials of Ashok Hotel before his appointment. However, instead of giving direct letter of appointment through
management of Ashok Hotel, he was issued letter through the contractor, M/s. Recruitment Bureau so as to deprive him
of proper pay-scales as well as other benefits applicable to the post of cashier. Workman herein was working in the
restaurants of Ashok Hotel, dealing with cash. However, he was not paid cash handling allowance of Rs.200.00 per
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938
2341
month, which he was entitled as per rules. It is pertinent to mention here that the workman was working with the
permanent cashiers appointed by the management of Ashok Hotel , who were being paid regular pay scale of cashier,
alongwith other allowances whereas the workman herein was paid less salary starting from Rs.7000.00 per month
whereas permanent employees working as cashiers are getting salary of Rs.30,000.00 per month. Job carried out by the
workman herein was perennial in nature and the same should have not been done through contractor, as such, contrary
to the provisions of Contract Labour Act, 1970. For the purpose of making payment of salary, management of Ashok
Hotel was using services of middleman contractor M/s. Recruitment Bureau, who was making payment to the workman
after receiving the said salary from the management of Ashok Hotel every month. It is further alleged that as per
Payment of Wages Act, 1948 workman is entitled to double the wages for extra duty performed by them, which was also
denied to the workman herein. EPF of the workman herein as per rule of Ashok Hotel should have been deposited in
Ashok Hotel Employees Provident Fund Trust No.DL-522, which was not done. Regional Provident Fund
Commissioner (North Delhi) cancelled the Ashok Hotel Employees PF Trust No.DL-522 on account of non-deposit of
PF money of the employees in the EPF Trust of Ashok Hotel, who were working through contractor, vide letter dated
28.12.2010, which was subsequently restored vide order dated 14.07.2011. Workman herein was also entitled for bonus
as per Bonus Act, 1965 for the financial years working since 2004 but the management of Ashok Hotel paid only
Rs.3000.00 once in the entire service of the workmen. Workman has completed 240 days in each calendar year and thus
was entitled for regularization of his services with the management of Ashok Hotel. However, instead of regularizing
services of the workman, his services were illegally terminated in September 2011. While removing the workman from
service no notice or pay in lieu thereof, nor any service compensation for the service rendered by the workmen was
given to him; as such, it violates provisions of Section 25F of the Act.
4.
There are also averments that as per Standing Orders of Ashok Hotel under Section No. 3 there is a
classification of the employees, i.e. Permanent, Temporary, Badlis, casuals, probationers and apprentices and the
management of Ashok Hotel cannot use services of employees through contractor and have to employ or appoint
employees in the above categories. Workmen were working in the premises of Ashok Hotel , who were beneficiary of
their services. As such, they were employees of Ashok Hotel for all purposes. The workman has also written letter to
the General Manager of Ashok Hotel on 30.12.2011 requesting them to take them on duty, but Ashok Hotel has not
responded to the said letter so far. President of Ashok Hotel Mazdoor Janta Union wrote a letters 07.01.2012 but the
same was not responded by the management of Ashok Hotel. In the end, Workman has prayed that the management of
Ashok Hotel be directed to reinstate him with full back wages.
5.
Management was put to notice, who filed written statement taking preliminary objections, claiming that the
present claim is totally misconceived, ill conceived and not tenable. It is further alleged that the workman herein was an
employee of M/s. Recruitment Bureau, as such, there is no cause of action against the management of Ashok Hotel. The
answering management is neither necessary nor a proper party for adjudication of the claim and name of the answering
management should be deleted and substituted with M/s. Recruitment Bureau, which is necessary party. Answering
management has entered into an agreement with M/s. Recruitment Bureau for providing manpower for job works which
was on principal to principal basis. Workman herein was permanent employee of M/s. Recruitment Bureau. Liability
towards all the relief of the workman is that of M/s. Recruitment Bureau and the answering management has no role in
the present dispute.
6.
On merits, management has denied most of the averments contained in the statement of claim. It is specifically
denied that the workman herein was working for the management of Ashok Hotel as he was an employee of M/s.
Recruitment Bureau under whose control and supervision he was working. It is also denied that attendance of workman
was being marked in I. Card section. Answering management has no rule with regard to marking of attendance of
workmen of Recruitment Bureau, who were deployed for rendering service under the contract. Answering management,
being principal employer, has no authority to make salary slip of the employees of Recruitment Bureau. Salary bill is
raised by the service provider is required to be verified by the concerned officer of Ashok Hotel to establish their
authenticity and to ensure compliance of statutory provisions. Averments made in the other paras in relation to
deployment, payment of wages, bonus etc. has also been denied by the management. Finally, it has been prayed that this
Tribunal may dismiss the claim filed by the workman herein.
7.
Against this factual background, my learned predecessor, on the basis of pleadings of the parties, vide order
dated 30.05.2012, framed the following issues:
(i)
Whether there is relationship of employer and employee between Ashok Hotel and the claimant?
(ii)
Whether the claimant is an employee of M/s. Recruitment Bureau to whom annual maintenance
contract has been given by M/s. Ashok Hotel?
(iii)
Whether the claimant rendered continuous service of more than 240 days with M/s. Ashok Hotel in
the preceding 12 months from the date of termination of his services?
2342
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(iv)
Whether termination of services of the claimant amounts to retrenchment?
(v)
Whether the claimant is entitled for reinstatement in the services of the management ?
8.
Workmen, in order to prove his case against the management examined himself as WW1 and Shri S.S.
Upadhyay as WW2, whose affidavits areEx.WW1/A and Ex.WW2/A respectively and they have also adduced several
documents in evidence and I would be discussing the same while rendering findings in the subsequent paras on various
issues.
9.
Management, in order to rebut the case of the workmen, examined Shri Lohit Joshi, Manager(HR) as MW1 and
also filed affidavit, Ex.MW1/A. He has also tendered in evidence certificate of registration under the Contract Labour
Act and copies of bills raised by Recruitment Bureau etc. and the documents are Ex.MW1/1 to Ex.MW1/8.
10.
I have heard Shri S.S. Upadhyay, authorized representative for the claimant and Shri B.K. Singh, authorized
representative for the management.
Findings on Issue No.1, 2 and 3
11.
All these issues are being taken up together for the purpose of discussion as they are inter-related and can be
conveniently disposed of.
12.
Shri Arjun Singh examined himself as WW1, whose affidavit is Ex.WW1/A. He has deposed that he was
working since October 2006 as cashier. It was the Manager who assigned duty to him as per duty roster. He used to
record time of his arrival as well as departure in the attendance register. His attendance was recorded by the Manager.
He used to work in shifts and his wages used to be paid through contractor. Photocopy of the Identity card issued to him
is Ex.WW1/7. He has not received any notice regarding details for the amount of deposits in his provident fund. He
specifically deposed that no termination letter was issued to him . There were regular employees in the Hotel who were
doing similar job of cashier. He has admitted that his wages were paid by M/s. Recruitment Bureau after getting bill
passed from the management. He further admitted that the management had not signed any documents with him relating
to his service conditions. He has denied other suggestions made by the management.
13.
It is clear from the affidavit filed by Shri S.S. Upadhyay, copy of which is Ex.WW2/A that the same is on
similar lines as the averments made in the statement of claim. During the course of arguments, it was not disputed that
Ashok Hotel Mazdoor Janta Union is recognized union by the management of Ashok Hotel and there are several cases
which have been filed by the workmen through the said union. Admittedly, Ashok Hotel is a public sector undertaking
being run by Board of Directors under the Ministry of Tourism. It has its own rules and regulations regarding working
of the Hotel. It was also not disputed that Certified Standing Orders modified from time to time are full applicable
governing services of the employees working in the said Hotel. During the course of arguments, attention of this
Tribunal was invited to Section 3 of the Sanding Order, Ex.WW2/1, which deals with the classification of the
employees, which clearly provides that all employees of the company shall be classified as under:
a)
Permanent
b)
Temporary
c)
Badlis
d)
Casuals
e)
Probationers
14.
Certified standing orders is a complete code so far as services of the employees working in Ashok Hotel is
concerned and it contains specific provisions relating to the procedure for dealing with cases of misconduct. The term
permanent, temporary, badlis, casuals and probationer workmen has also been fully defined in the said standing orders.
It is specifically averred in para 8 of affidavit Ex.WW2/A that the strength of employees approved by the Board of
Directors is 1494 in all and employees are appointed in respective categories as per strength of the category. There is
also specific mention of the vacant posts and it is specifically alleged that so far as post of cashiers/clerks were
concerned, 50 posts of cashiers/clerks were vacant in 2012 against sanctioned post of about 100. Further, management
of Ashok Hotel utilizes services of workmen through M/s. Recruitment Bureau. However, supervision and control over
the workmen was that of the management of Ashok Hotel. Admittedly, workman herein was working in the premises
of Ashok Hotel. Shri S.S. Upadhyay has admitted that on number of occasions, payment of wages was made when he
happened to be present there. Payment of wages was made through M/s. Recruitment Bureau to the workmen. He has
further admitted that the workman herein was engaged by M/s. Recruitment Bureau and his services were dispensed
with by the said Bureau. He has tendered in evidence duty chart Ex.WW2/13, which shows that the workmen used to
work in the premises of Ashok Hotel and officials of Ashok Hotel used to mark their attendance. This witness also
tendered in evidence document Ex.WW2/5 which shows that management has awarded job contract to the agency
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938
2343
mentioned in the said document. There is also letter dated 26.08.2008 Ex.WW2/6 written by Manager, Ashok Hotel to
M/s. Recruitment Bureau wherein requirement of 16 candidates has been mentioned to the needful work. There is yet
another letter Ex.WW2/7 dated 28.07.2008 which shows that deployment of Shri Satveer Nimesh as Cashier was done
by the management of Ashok Hotel. Another letter Ex.WW2/8 addressed by the General Manager to M/s. Sparkling
Enterprises shows that the management of Ashok Hotel complained to the contractor that the employees mentioned in
the said letter were found to be sleeping during surprise check carried out by officials of the management. Competent
authority has directed to take major penalty action against the delinquent employees. This again shows that so far as
working of the employees is concerned, supervision and control over them was that of the management of Ashok Hotel
and the so called contractor was engaged by the principal employee, i.e. Ashok Hotel was simply a service provider on
paper who has forwarded name of workmen for the purpose of deployment in the various units of the Hotel. Ex.WW2/9
shows that surprise check was carried out by officials of the Hotel on the night of 24/25.08.2008 and the workers whose
names are mentioned in the said list were found sleeping. Ex.WW2/12 shows list of workmen employed in Ashok
Hotel.
15.
After termination of the job of the workman herein, Shri S.S. Upadhyay, President of the Union has written
letter to the General Manager, Ashok Hotel, informing the management that cashier, namely Shri Arjun Singh who was
working under the management of Ashok Hotel since October 2006 has now been removed from service in an illegal
manner. However, there is force in the contention of the workman herein that no such notice before termination or
payment of salary in lieu of the notice was made to the workman before removal or terminating his services.
16.
Management, in order to rebut the case of the workman, examined Shri Lohit Joshi as MW1, whose affidavit is
Ex.MW1/A. He has tendered documents relating to Certificate of Registration Ex./MW1/1 and other documents
Ex.MW1/2, to Ex.MW1/8. He was posted at Ashok Hotel in October 2012. He has admitted that Certified Standing
Orders are applicable to employees of Ashok Hotel. He has admitted the various categories of the employees as
mentioned in the said Standing Orders. He further admitted creation of provident fund trust pertaining to employees of
Ashok Hotel. He admitted that as per rule 14, Ex.WW2/2, duty is cast on the principal employer to deposit contribution
of the provident fund in respect of employees of the contractor in the Trust. He has further deposed that wages were
paid to all the employees through M/s. Recruitment Bureau and said employees were working in Ashok Hotel. He has
admitted that duty chart Ex.WW1/4 bears signatures of the Bills Manager at point A. To a court question as to why
signature of Bills Manager appears at point A, witness sought further time to explain the said fact. He has admitted that
Ex.WW2/13 nowhere bears signatures of the contractor. It is clear from perusal of duty chart Ex.WW2/13 that duty chart
does not bear signature of the contractor or any of his agent. Bills Manager as signed the same at the end. Thus, there
is no force in the contention of the management that it was M/s Recruitment Bureau who was having overall control on
the working as well as supervision over the workmen herein. There is amply evidence on record, as discussed above, to
show that above contractor was simply a name lender and the workman herein was actually working under complete
control and supervision of the management of Ashok Hotel. Their placement on duty as well as nature of duty was duly
determined by the management from time to time and they were also shifted from one place to another within the
premises of Ashok Hotel by the officials of the management so as to get work from them.
17.
Now, the primary question which arises for consideration is whether the workman were in the employment of
Ashok Hotel or were employed by M/s. Recruitment Bureau. Equally important is the fact that agreement between the
management of Ashok Hotel and the contractor is genuine or simply a sham and camouflage so as to deny status of
workmen under the principal employer herein. In this regard, strong reliance was placed by Shri Upadhyay, learned
authorized representative appearing on behalf of the workman upon Steel Authority of India Ltd. and others Vs. National
Union Waterfront Workers and others (2001) 7 SCC 1, wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court considered extensively
various provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 as well as Contract Labour Act, 1970 alongwith relevant
notification issued under Section 10 of the Contract Labour Act, 1970. A critical appraisal of the above judgement
would show that the Hon’ble Apex Court has taken into consideration the entire spectrum of the case law on the subject
and held in para 107 as under:
107. An analysis of the cases, discussed above, shows that they fall in three classes: (i) where contract labour is
engaged in or in connection with the work of an establishment and employment of contract labour is prohibited
either because the industrial adjudicator/court ordered abolition of contract labour or because the appropriate
Government issued notification under Section 10(1) of the CLRA Act, no automatic absorption of the contract
labour working in the establishment was ordered; (ii) where the contract was found to be a sham and nominal,
rather a camouflage, in which case the contract labour working in the establishment of the principal employer
were held, in fact and in reality, the employees of the principal employer himself. Indeed, such cases do not
relate to abolition of contract labour but present instances wherein the Court pierced the veil and declared the
correct position as a fact at the stage after employment of contract labour stood prohibited; (iii) where in
discharge of a statutory obligation of maintaining a canteen in an establishment the principal employer availed
2344
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
the services of a contractor the courts have held that the contract labour would indeed be the employees of the
principal employer.
18.
Ratio of the above judgement has been cited with approval in all the subsequent pronouncement by the various
High Courts as well as the Hon’ble Supreme Court and while making various conclusions, ratio of he law in Hussanbhai
case (three judgements decision) was approved and ratio of the judgement in Air India Statutory Corporation Vs. United
Labour Union (1997) 9 SCC 377 was partly overruled prospectively. It was also made clear that neither Section 10 of
the Contract Labour Ac nor any other provisions under the Act, whether expressly or by necessary implication provides
for automatic absorption of the contact labour on issuance of notification by the appropriate Government under sub-
section 1 of Section 10 prohibiting employment of contract labour in any process, operation or other work in any
establishment. Mater is to be decided judiciously by the Industrial Adjudicator where a contractor has been interposed
either on the ground of having undertaken to produce any given result for the establishment or for supply of contract
labour for the work of the establishment under a genuine contract or is merely a ruse/camouflage to evade compliance
with various beneficial legislations so as to deprive the workers of the benefit there-under. If the contract is found to be
not genuine but a mere camouflage, the so called contract labour will be treated as employees of the principal employer
who shall be directed to regularize services of the contract labour in the establishment concerned, subject to the
conditions as may be specified by it for that purpose in the light of para 6 hereunder:
(6) If the contract is found to be genuine and prohibition notification under Section 10(1) of the CLRA Act in
respect of the concerned establishment has been issued by the appropriate Government, prohibiting
employment of contract labour in any process, operation or other work of any establishment and where in such
process, operation or other work of the establishment the principal employer intends to employ regular
workmen he shall give preference to the erstwhile contract labour, if otherwise found suitable and, if necessary,
by relaxing the condition as to maximum age appropriately taking into consideration the age of the workers at
the time of their initial employment by the contractor and also relaxing the condition as to academic
qualifications other than technical qualifications.
19.
This Tribunal has to keep one thing in mind that the Industrial Disputes Act as well as Contract Labour Act.
Essential and beneficial legislation of the scheme of the Contract Labour Act 1970 is to regulate conditions of workers
under the contract labour system and to provide for its abolition by the appropriate Government as provided under
Section 10 of the said Act. Section 12 of the said Act bars a contractor from undertaking or executing any work through
contract labour, except under and in accordance with a licence issued. Section 23, 24 and 25 of the Act makes
contravention of provisions of the Act punishable there-under. There is also requirement for the principal employer of
the establishment to get itself registered under the Act so as to avail the benefit of provisions of the Act.
20.
Reliance was also placed upon the case of Management of Ashok Hotel vs Their Workmen decided on
19.02.2013 in WP(C) No.14828/2006 wherein similar question was involved. It was a case where various workmen
were working continuously as safaiwala/Housemen in the kitchen department etc. and they were alleged to be working
directly under the contactor who has entered into a contract with the principal employer, i.e. Ashok Hotel. Strong
reliance was placed on behalf of the workmen upon ratio of the case in Steel Authority of India (supra) and contention of
the management to the effect that workmen were employees of the contractor was rejected. Further, contract in the said
case was also held to be sham and camouflage so as to deny direct relationship of employer (Ashok Hotel) and the
workmen.
21.
Lastly, reliance was placed upon the case of J. Elangovan vs. CGIT cum Labour Court Chennai decided on
13.12.2010 wherein workmen who were engaged as lift operators through contractor by the principal employer, i.e
Airport Authority of India, were held to be employees of the contractor by the Industrial Tribunal and an appeal against
the same was filed before the Hon’ble High Court wherein same plea was taken as in the case in hand that the workmen
were getting salary through contractor and were not engaged by the principal employer, who was not having any
effective control over them. However, this plea was rejected by the Hon’ble High Court by heavily relying upon the
ratio of the case of Hussain Bhai Calicut Vs. The Alath Factory Thezhilali Union, Kozhikode & others (1978 4 SCC
257), Catering Cleaners of Southern Railway Vs. Union of India and another (1987 1 SCC 700), Silver Jubilee Tailoring
House and others vs. Chief Inspector of Shops and Establishments and another (1974 (3) SCC 498, Mishra Chatu Nigam
Ltd. and others V.M. Venkataiah and others ( 2003 7 SCC 488), Sankar Mukherjee and others vs. Union of India and
others ((1990(Supp.) SCC 668 and Ram Singh and others Vs. Union Territory Chandigarh & others ( 2004 1 SCC 126).
It was also observed that the test for determining as to whether workers hired through contractor can be treated as
employees of the principal employer rests on the nature of the activity entrusted. Where nature of work entrusted to the
contract workers are integral part of the activity of the management and intervention of intermediary or contractor,
absence of direct relationship between worker and principal employer, including control by the principal employer,
payment of salary by the contractor and maintenance of attendance register by the contractor are not of any consequence,
particularly more so when the nature of job entrusted to such contract workers is the same as one done by regular
employees. Agreement in the said case was held to be sham and camouflage. Situation in the case in hand is in no way
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938
2345
different. It is clear from evidence on record that workman herein was being paid salary by the contractor through
officials of Ashok Hotel. Work of cashier, as per statement of MW1 is regular and perennial in nature. It is further clear
that contract Ex.WW2/5 was awarded to M/s Recruitment Bureau initially for a period of three years and he has simply
provided workforce to Ashok Hotel, whose officials were supervising and were having effective control over working of
such employees. Further, job of casher is very delicate and is in fact being performed by regular employees of Ashok
Hotel also. As a result of the discussions above and in the light of the ratio of decisions in the above judgements
coupled with evidence on record, contract in the case is held to be sham and a mere camouflage so as to deny
relationship of employer (Ashok Hotel) and workmen herein.
22.
It is further clear from the critical appraisal of the above judgements that services of the workman is taken in
connection with the work of the establishment, by the principal employer through contractor, in that eventuality,
contractor merely acts as an agent or a broker on behalf of the principal employer and the workman in such a situation
would continue to the a direct employee of the principal employer and not that of the agent or the broker. In the case in
hand also, it is clear from the evidence on record, that the workmen herein were admittedly working as Cashiers with the
management regularly, though alleged to be in the employment of M/s Recruitment Bureau. Supervisory control upon
him remained with that of the management.
23.
It is also clear from perusal of the Certified Standing Orders Ex.WW1/1 that Section III details with the
classification of employees and the same is reproduced as under:
Section 3 : Classification of Employees
a)
Permanent
b)
Temporary
c)
Badlis
d)
Casuals
e)
Probationers
24.
Since appointment of contact labour is not contemplated in the above Certified Standing Orders, as such, the
engagement of workmen through contract labour is patently against the law and Standing Orders Ex.WW2/1.
25.
Workman herein has also filed documents Ex.WW2/2 which deals with the deposit of provident fund of the
employees engaged by the employer. Similarly, document Ex.WW2/3 shows that contractor or the employer was not
depositing the provident fund etc. with the Trust so constituted under the Regulation, as a result of which exemption
granted to the management was withdrawn by the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Delhi, North. There is
another document, Ex.WW2/4, which shows the position of employees who were working in the establishment of the
management. During the course of arguments, it was not disputed that several posts of various categories are lying
vacant in the establishment of the management and have not been filled up so far as the Central Government has not
granted permission to fill up the same. In such a situation, one thing is crystal clear that though the work of the
workman herein who were admittedly working as Cashiers with the management is regular in nature, yet the
management is deploying workers through contractors. It is further clear that management has adopted this devise so as
to deprive the workmen of regular employment and deprive them of their permanent livelihood, which is totally against
the spirit of Contract Labour Act, 1970 wherein it is clearly provided that when a work is regular or permanent in nature,
there is no question of employing contract labour, particular when such labour is not covered by any clause mentioned in
Section III of the Certified Standing Order. This also amount to unfair labour practice.
26.
Admittedly, no notice whatsoever was served upon the workman herein before ordering his termination, as he
has been working since October 2006. Thus, in the case in hand, there is violation of Section 25F of the Act, which
requires that if a workman has worked continuously for 240 days in a calendar year, then the management is required to
issue notice to such workman, which has not been done in the case in hand. Thus, there is no merit in the contention of
the management that the workman herein was directly employed by M/s Recruitment Bureau. when the overall control
and supervision remained with the management.
27.
So far as question of regularization of the workman herein is concerned, this Tribunal cannot give directions for
regularization of the workman in view of the clear cut ratio of law in Steel Authority of India (supra) wherein it was held
that question of regularization is to be decided by the principal employer after taking into consideration the minimum
qualification, age as well as availability of posts. There is no such evidence to this effect brought on record, either by the
workman or the management. As such, plea of the workman for regularization cannot be entertained at this stage. This
is to be decided by the management after taking into consideration the necessary rules applicable to such employees
governing such regulation.
Issue No.(iv)
2346
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
28.
During the course of arguments, it was strongly urged on behalf of the management that M/s Recruitment
Bureau was a necessary party to the controversy and in the absence of its impleadment as a necessary party, reference
filed by the workman herein is not legally maintainable. Shri Upadhyay, authorized representative on behalf of the
workman countered the above submissions by urging that the workman herein was in the employment of the
management and that payment of wages were made to him through contractor with the prior approval of the
management, as such M/s. Recruitment Bureau is not a necessary party. To my mind, when reference has been made
under Section 10 of the Act by the appropriate Government, , this Tribunal does not have the power to implead a party.
Hence, there is no force in the contention of the management inasmuch as the management should have examined the
contractor M/s Recruitment Bureau so as to ascertain its terms and conditions. Moreover, M/s Recruitment Bureau is
simply a proper party and is not the necessary party for the adjudication of the controversy in question. Hence, this issue
is answered accordingly.
Relief
29.
Consequently, it is held that termination of the workman herein, i.e. from 20.09.2011 is held to be illegal and
workman herein are entitled to be reinstated. Since it has come in the evidence of the workman that he is unemployed
since the date of his termination and there being no evidence to the contrary led by the management, as such, the
workman herein is liable to be reinstated with full back wages from the date of his termination. An award is accordingly
passed. Let this award be sent to the appropriate Government, as required under Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947, for publication.
Dated : April 21, 2016
A. C. DOGRA, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 6 ebZ] 2016
dk-vk- 1052-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj lh-ih-MCY;w-
Mh- ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkj ds chp vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;&1] fnYyh ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 101@2013) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 05-05-2016 dks
izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&42012@237@2010&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)]
Ikh- ds- os.kqxksiky] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 6th May, 2016
S.O. 1052.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (I.D No. 101/2013) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal Cum-
Labour-Court No.1, Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to
the management of C.P.W.D. and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 05.05.2016.
[No. L-42012/237/2010-IR (DU)]
P. K. VENUGOPAL, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
IN THE COURT OF SHRI AVTAR CHAND DOGRA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT NO.1, KARKARDOOMA COURT COMPLEX, DELHI
ID No. 101/2013
Radhey Shyam Saini, S/o Shri Rattan Lal Singh, through
General Secretary,
CPWD Mazdoor Union,
A/o Room No.95, Barracks No.1/10,
Jam Nagar House, Shah Jahan Road,
New Delhi-110 001
…Workmen
Versus
The Director General ,
C.P.W.D.,
Nirman Bhawan,
New Delhi-110 001
…Managements
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938
2347
AWARD
Reference was received under Section 10 of sub-section 2(A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 for
adjudication from the Central Government vide letter No.L-42012/237/2010-IR(DU) dated 22.03.2016 and the terms of
reference are as under:
‘Whether the action of the management of CPWD, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi in terminating the services of
Shri Radhey Shyam Saini S/o Shri Rattan Lal Singh, ex-wireman, without any notice or pay in lieu of notice
period and retrenchment compensation is legal and justified? What relief the workman is entitled to and from
which date?
2. Backgrounds facts giving rise to the above reference are that Shri Radhey Shyam Saini (in short the workman
herein) was initially engaged as wireman with effect from 30.08.1999 and was performing his duties as pump operator
under the Executive Engineer, (Electrical), Electrical Division, XIV Sub Division IV, Pragati Maidan, New Delhi. Later
on, services of the workman herein were terminated without one months’ notice or salary in lieu thereof with effect from
14.10.2009.
3.
Workman herein had earlier filed a writ petition bearing No.2671 of 2000 in the High Court of Delhi for
regularization of his services directly under the management of CPWD as contract in the case was alleged to be sham
and camouflage. Hon’ble High Court vide judgement dated 26.11.2001 has given liberty to the workman herein to
approach the appropriate forum in accordance with the observations of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of Steel
Authority of India vs. National Union Water Front Workers Union (2001 Lab.I.C 3556). Copy of the above judgement is
enclosed as Annexure A with the statement of claim.
4.
Further, it is averred that the workman herein was working through a fake contractor, M/s Multi Trading
Engineers on a job of perennial nature and was designated as Generator Operator on 30.08.1999 but basically the
workman was performing major job of wireman and electrician as he was holding a valid licence from the Secretary
(Labour) Government of NCT Delhi. He was posted at Andaman and Nicobar Bhawan, Chanakyapuri, New Delhi
under Executive Engineer(Electrical) and he was under the direct employment of the respondent management through
the contractor. Relative details of the workman herein are as under:
‘Radhey Shyam Saini, the workman herein is passed 9th standard and at present is working as
Operator/Wireman with CPWD. The workman therein entered the services in the office of CPWD on
3008.1999 through M/s Multi Trading Engineers, the contractor. The workman has been working for more than
240 days in each of the calendar year under the control and supervision of the Junior Engineer, Assistant
Engineer etc.
5.
Workman herein had also raised an industrial dispute for regularization of his services after judgement of the
Hon’ble High Court dated 26.08.2001 and the same is still pending before the Secretary, Ministry of Labour,
Government of India, Shram Shakti Bhawan, New Delhi. Workman is in the employment of CPWD for more than
10 years and it is totally a misnomer to call services of the workman as being one through contractor. Officers of CPWD
alongwith the contractor are working in collusion with each other by adopting unfair means and to deny the benefits of
regular employment of the management of CPWD to the workman herein. Ministry of Labour, vide notification dated
21.07.2002, has prohibited employment of work, i.e. wiremen, electrician etc. and copy of the same is Annexure B.
Daily rated workers in CPWD who are performing similar work as that of the workman herein are getting regular
salary/wages from the date of their initial employment alongwith allowances etc. Copy of order of payment equal pay to
the daily rated persons is filed alongwith the claim. When the workman herein demanded regularization of his services,
management terminated his services, without following due procedure under the law. It is also the case of the workman
that after abolition of contract labour vide notification dated 21.07.2002, workman herein is to be treated as direct
employee of management of CPWD. Workman has also annexed his licence/certification of completing Class 10.
6.
Claim of the workman was resisted by the management by filing reply thereto and have taken preliminary
objections, including that the claim is liable to be dismissed as office of DG((W) CPWD is not an industry nor an
industrial establishment or industrial undertaking so as to attract provisions of the ID Act. CPWD is a Central
Government Department and is performing sovereign functions of the State as enshrined in Constitution of India. Copy
of judgement passed by CGIT, Jaipur is also filed with the reply. It is further alleged that the reference is devoid of any
merits and as such this Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to try the present dispute.. Reference was made to the
judgement of Hon’ble High Court of Delhi in which the case of the workman was dismissed vide order dated
26.09.2001. On merits, material averments have been denied by the management. It is denied that the workman herein
has worked with the management at any point of time. Workman was engaged by the contractor, M/s Parmar Electricals
who was assigned the contract. It is also denied that the workman herein was under the employment of the management
for more than 10 years. It is further denied that the workman was working under Multi Trading Engineers. Since the
2348
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
workman has never been directly in the employment of the management, hence question of his completing 240 days in a
calendar year does not arise at all. Workman is not even a casual worker of CPWD. Management has also made
reference to Surinder Singh & Others vs. The Engineer-in-Chief stating that said judgement is not applicable to the case
of the workman herein in view of the ratio of judgement in State of Karnataka Vs. Uma Devi (2006) (4) SCC I) wherein
Hon’ble Apex Court observed that when a workman is not engaged in accordance with due procedure, his services
cannot be regularized nor he can claim any relief. Further, judgement of the Apex Court in Airport Authority of India
has been prospectively overruled by the Supreme Court in Steel Authority of India and others Vs. National Union
Waterfront Workers and others (2001) 7 SCC 1) wherein it is observed that section 10 of the CLRA Act empowers the
employer to engage contract labour and principal employ canoe be ordered absorption of contract labour as a matter of
right. Management has denied other averments contained in the remaining paras. It has been specifically alleged that in
the present case, work was allotted to CPWD for carrying out electrical services at Andaman and Nicobar Bhawan,
Chanakyapuri. Since CPWD could not perform the said work, it was awarded to a contractor. Workman was directly
under the control and supervision of the Contraction , who in turn was answerable to CPWD. Against this factual
background, my learned predecessor vide order dated 07.10.2013 framed the following issues from the pleadings of the
parties:
(1)
Whether there exists relationship of employer and employee between the parties?
(2)
Whether claimant was an employee of the contractor?
(3)
As in terms of reference
7.
Workman in support of his case examined himself and tendered in evidence his affidavit Ex.WW1/A and also
tendered in evidence various documents, i.e. Ex.WW1/1 to Ex.WW1/4 and management in order to rebut the case of the
workman examined Shri M.P. Sharma as MW1 and his affidavit is Ex.MW1/A. He has tendered in evidence documents
Ex.MW1/1 to Ex.MW1/12. Initially the management examined Shri Roop Lal who tendered in evidence his affidavit.
However, later on, he was not available for his cross examination, as such, Shri M.P. Sharma was examined by the
management as MW1. I would be adverting to the same in the subsequent paras while drawing my conclusions.
Findings on Issue No.1 and 2
8.
Both these issues are being taken up together for the purpose of discussion as they are inter related and can be
conveniently disposed of.
9.
Shri B.K. Prasad, authorized representative appearing on behalf of the workman herein urged that the workman
was initially engaged by the management on 30.08.1999 and thereafter he is regularly performing his job under the
supervision and control of the management of CPWD. The so called agreement executed by the management with the
contractor is a fake document and workman is not aware of the same. Workman was performing job in the manner
being directed by officials of CPWD and the workman has not even seen the face of the contractor during his entire
service.
10.
Case of contractor Multi Trading Engineers and job which the workman was performing is regular and
perennial nature. He was designated as generator operator after 30.08.1999 and he was also performing major job of
Electrician/wireman as he was having valid licence or the same. Learned authorized representative also placed reliance
upon Steel Authority of India and others Vs. National Union Waterfront Workers and others(supra) and a few other
judgements in support of his submission so as to allege that the so called contract between the management and the
contractor is only a fake and sham document. Contractor is simply a name lender and has no control over the working of
the workman herein, whose work in fact was being directly scrutinized and supervised by the officials of CPWD. Work
of the workman was technical in nature and could not have been supervised by the contractor, who has no knowledge of
the same.
11.
Per contra, Ms.Avtar Kaur Dhingra, authorized representative appearing on behalf of the management urged the
workman herein was never in the direct employment of CPWD nor he was recruited in a regular manner by inviting
application from eligible candidates. He has never appeared before any Board or gave interview nor any letter of
appointment was issued to him. Status of the workman herein, at the most, is that of casual or contract labour whose
services have been terminated by the contractor who has engaged him. Attention of this Tribunal was also invited to the
case of State of Karnataka Vs. Uma Devi(supra), wherein Hon’ble Apex Court has held that where recruitment has not
been made in accordance with the rules or regulations or his employment is through back door entry, there is no question
of giving any regular employment to such employees.
12.
Before I proceed to consider the comparative merits of the submissions raised on behalf of either of the parties,
it is necessary to mention here that during the course of arguments, it was not disputed that contract was awarded by the
management to different contractors, though the management witness, MW1 has feigned ignorance whether Shri Radhey
Shyam Saini was operating pump of CPWD from 30.09.1999. However, no evidence was brought on record by the
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938
2349
management to show as to who was performing this function. It was admitted that matter was also taken before making
reference to this Tribunal to the Assistant Labour Commissioner, as is clear from the failure report, Ex.WW1/7. Shri
M.P. Sharma MW1 has also admitted that no notice before termination was given to the workman herein as he was not
directly employed by the management. However, he has admitted that CPWD has assigned the work of operation of
pump to the contractor, who has employed the workman. The work at Andaman and Nicobar Bhawan, Chanakyapuri
was allotted to CPWD, which was being done through contractor. He further admitted that CPWD was the owner of the
said pump. Later on, this witness made a vital admission, after Ex.WW1/2 was shown, that the workman herein was
doing the work of wireman/electrician. He further admitted that Ex.WW1/4 is licence of the workman herein. It is not
out of place to mention here that even in the affidavit, it is admitted that in the present case work was allotted to CPWD
to carry out maintenance work of electric services at Andaman and Nicobar Bhawan, Chanakyapuri of CPWD at New
Delhi. Further it is clear from agreements, Ex,MW1/1 to Ex.MW1/12 that from 1999-2000 till 2009-2010, work of
maintenance etc, has been given to M/s Multi Trading Engineers, M/s Paramjit Singh Walia, M/s Naini Electricals, SK
Consumer Services etc. Perusal of certificate of the workman herein shows that his date of birth is 16.06.1965 and he
has studied upto the 10th class. There is another letter Ex.WW1/6 issued by Government of India to all the
Superintendent Engineers regarding regularization of the muster roll/casual workers of CPWD as a one-time measure.
There is nothing on record to show that the case of the workman herein was not considered in view of the above letter.
Perusal of letter Ex.MW1/14 shows that no complaint of any labour was received against the contractor and award letter
shows that the work was awarded to M/s Multi Engineering Works, whose tender was accepted from 01.05.1999.
Management has not taken care to examine any of the contractors who were awarded works from time to time from
1999 till 2010, so as to show that the work was being directly done through contractors, who were having full
and effective control over such workmen who were working for the benefit of the management of CPWD. Examination
of the contractor in the case was also necessary so as to ascertain as to who was marking attendance of the said workmen
or making payment of salary, whether EPF and ESI were being deducted from the salary of the workmen. There is no
merit in the contention of the management that examination of the contractor should have been from the side of the
workman, who has to prove the contract. Since the workman herein has from the very beginning alleged that the above
contracts are fake/sham, therefore, it was imperative for the management to have examined the contractor to whom the
management had awarded the works from time to time. Admittedly, the workman herein is not a party to such contract.
Therefore, the workman is not aware of the terms and conditions contained in the above agreement, which were filed
very late during the course of evidence of the management.
13.
Now, the vital question which arises for determination is as to whether the workman herein was an employee of
the contractor or contracts in the present case from 1999 onwards as placed on record by the management are fake, sham
and nominal.
14.
Equally vital is the question whether there existed relationship of employer and employee between the parties,
in case it is held that the contract in the above case is fake. During the course of arguments, strong reliance was placed
upon the judgement of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Steel Authority of India Vs. National Union Water Front
Workers Union (supra). In the above case, Hon’ble Apex Court has considered extensively various provisions of the
Industrial Disputes Act as well As contract Labour Act 1970, alongwith relevant notification issued under Section 10 of
the CLRA Act, 1970. One of the questions which arose in the above case was regarding ambit and scope of
‘appropriate Government’ as defined in Section 2 (1)(a) of the CLRA Act. Incidentally, Hon’ble Apex Court also dealt
with the question of sham and camouflage contracts/agreements. Critical appraisal of the above judgements also shows
that Hon’ble Apex Court has taken into consideration the entire spectrum of the case law on the subject and held in Para
107 as under:
107. An analysis of the cases, discussed above, shows that they fall in three classes: (i) where contract labour is
engaged in or in connection with the work of an establishment and employment of contract labour is prohibited
either because the industrial adjudicator/court ordered abolition of contract labour or because the appropriate
Government issued notification under Section 10(1) of the CLRA Act, no automatic absorption of the contract
labour working in the establishment was ordered; (ii) where the contract was found to be a sham and nominal,
rather a camouflage, in which case the contract labour working in the establishment of the principal employer
were held, in fact and in reality, the employees of the principal employer himself. Indeed, such cases do not
relate to abolition of contract labour but present instances wherein the Court pierced the veil and declared the
correct position as a fact at the stage after employment of contract labour stood prohibited; (iii) where in
discharge of a statutory obligation of maintaining a canteen in an establishment the principal employer availed
the services of a contractor the courts have held that the contract labour would indeed be the employees of the
principal employer.
15.
The Court ruled that neither section 10 of the Contract Labour Act nor any other provision in that Act, whether
expressly or by necessary implication, provides for automatic absorption of contract labour on issuance of a notification
by the appropriate Government under sub section (1) of section 10, prohibiting employment of contract labour, in any
2350
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
process, operation or other work in any establishment. Consequently the principal employer cannot be required to order
for absorption of the contract labour working in the establishment concerned. It was further ruled therein that in
Saraspur Mills case (1974 (3) SCC 66), the workman engaged for working in the canteen run by the Cooperative
Society for the appellant were the employees of the appellant mills. In Basti Sugar Mills (AIR 1964 S.C. 355) a canteen
was run in the factory by the Co-operative Society and as such the workers working in the canteen were held to be
employees of the establishment. The Apex Court ruled that these cases fall in class (3) mentioned above. Judgment in
Hussainbhai (1978 Lab.I.C. 1264) was considered by the Apex Court in the said precedent and it was ruled therein that
the said precedent falls in class (2), referred above. The Apex Court concluded that on issuance of prohibitive
notification under section 10 of the Contract Labour Act prohibiting employment of contract labour or otherwise, in an
industrial dispute brought before it by any contract labour in regard to conditions of service, the Industrial Adjudicator
will have to consider the question whether the contractor has been interposed either on the ground of having undertaken
to produce any given result for the establishment or for supply of contract labour for work of the establishment under a
genuine contract or is a mere ruse/camouflage to evade compliance of various beneficial legislation so as to deprive the
workers of the benefit thereunder. If the contract is found to be not genuine but a mere camouflage, the so called contract
labour will have to be treated as employees of the principal employer who shall be directed to regularize the services of
the contract labour in the establishment concerned, subject to the conditions as may be specified by it for that purpose.
16.
As announced by the Apex Court, on issuance of a prohibitive notification , prohibiting employment of contract
labour or otherwise in any industrial dispute brought before it by the contract labour in regard to conditions of his
service, the industrial adjudicator will have to consider the question whether the contractor has been interposed either on
the ground of having undertaken to produce any given result in the establishment or for supply of the contract labour for
the work of the establishment under a genuine contract or it is a mere ruse/camouflage to evade compliance of beneficial
legislation so as to deprive the workers of the benefits therein. Thus it was ruled that a contract labour can raise a dispute
before the industrial adjudicator in regard to his conditions of service and in case the contract is found to be not genuine
but a mere camouflage, the so called contract labour will have to be treated as employees of the principal employer. Also
see Standard Vacuum Refining Co. of India Ltd. (1960 (II) LLJ. 233), which was referred with approval in Steel
Authority of India.
17.
In Shivnandan Sharma (1955(1) LLJ 688), the respondent Bank entrusted its Cash Department under a contract
to the Treasures who appointed cashiers, including the appellant Head Cashier. The question before the Apex Court was:
was the appellant an employee of the Bank? On construction of the agreement entered into the Bank and the Treasure,
the Court laid down:
“If a master employs a servant and authorizes him to employ a number of persons to do a particular job and to
guarantee their fidelity and efficiency for a cash consideration, the employees thus appointed by the servant
would be equally with the employer, servant of the master.”
18.
In the above precedent the Hon’ble Apex Court for the first time laid down the crucial test of supervision and
control for determining the relationship of employer and employee.
19.
In Hussainbhai (supra) the petitioner, who was manufacturing ropes, entrusted the work to a contractor who
engaged his own workers. When, after some time, the workers were not engaged, they raised an industrial dispute that
they were denied employment by the petitioner. On reference of that dispute, the labour court passed an award against
the petitioner. When matter reached the Apex Court, on examination of various factors and applying the effective control
test, it was held that though there was no direct relationship between the petitioner and the workers yet on lifting the veil
and looking at the conspectus of factors governing employment, the naked truth, though draped in different perfect paper
arrangement, was that the real employer was the petitioner, not the immediate contractor. The Apex Court stated law in
following words:
“Where a worker or group of workers labours to produce goods or services and these goods or services are for
the business of another, that other is, in fact, the employer. He has economic control over the workers’
subsistence, skill, and continued employment. If he, for any reason, chokes off, the worker is, virtually, laid off.
The presence of intermediate contractor with whom alone the workers have immediate or direct relationship ex-
contractu is of no consequence when, on lifting the veil or looking at the conspectus of factors governing
employment, we discern the naked truth, though draped in different perfect paper arrangement, that the real
employer is the management, not the immediate contractor***. If the livelihood of the workmen substantially
depends on labour rendered to produce goods and services for the benefit and satisfaction of an enterprise, the
absence of direct relationship or the presence of dubious intermediaries or the make-believe trappings of
detachment from the management cannot snap the real-life bond. The story may vary but the inference defies
ingenuity. The liability cannot be shaken off. Of course, if there is total dissociation in fact between the
disowning management and the aggrieved workmen, the employment is, in substance and real-life terms, by
another. The management’s adventitious connections cannot ripen into real employment.”
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938
2351
20.
As noted above, this precedent does not present an illustration of abolition of contract labour but an instance
where the Court pierced the veil and declared the correct position to the effect that the contract labours were employees
of the principal employer and not of the contractor.
21.
In Steel Authority of India (supra) it has been ruled that the term “contract labour” is a species of workman. A
workman may be hired : (1) in an establishment by the principal employer or by his agent with or without the knowledge
of the principal employer, or (2) in connection with the work of an establishment by the principal employer through a
contractor or by a contractor with or without the knowledge of principal employer. Where a workman is hired in or in
connection with the work of an establishment by the principal employer through a contractor, he merely acts as an agent
so there will be master and servant relationship between the principal employer and the workman. But when a workman
is hired in or in connection with the work of an establishment by a contractor, either because he has undertaken to
produce a given result for the establishment or because he supplies workmen for any work of the establishment, a
question might arise whether the contractor is a mere camouflage as in Hussainbhai’s case (supra) and in Indian
Petrochemicals Corporation case (1999 (6) S.C.C. 439) etc.; if the answer is in affirmative, the workman will be in fact
an employee of the principal employer, but if the answer is in the negative, the workman will be a contract labour.
22.
This Tribunal has to keep one thing in mind that the Industrial Disputes Act as well as Contract Labour Act are
essentially social and beneficial legislation. The scheme of the Contract Labour Act 1970 is to regulate conditions of
workers under the contract labour system and to provide for its abolition by the appropriate Government as provided
under Section 10 of the said Act. Section 7 of the Act requires the principal employer to get itself registered. Section 12
of the said Act bars a contractor from undertaking or executing any work through contract labour, except under and in
accordance with a licence issued. Section 23, 24 and 25 of the Act makes contravention of provisions of the Act
punishable there-under. There is also requirement for the principal employer of the establishment to get itself registered
under the Act so as to avail the benefit of provisions of the Act.
23.
Reliance was also placed upon the case of Management of Ashok Hotel vs. Their Workmen decided on
19.02.2013 in WP(C) No.14828/2006 wherein similar question was involved. It was a case where various workmen
were working continuously as safaiwala/Housemen in the kitchen department etc. and they were alleged to be working
directly under the contactor who has entered into a contract with the principal employer, i.e. Ashok Hotel. Strong
reliance was placed on behalf of the workmen upon ratio of the case in Steel Authority of India (supra) and contention of
the management to the effect that workmen were employees of the contractor was rejected. Further, contract in the said
case was also held to be sham and camouflage so as to deny direct relationship of employer (Ashok Hotel) and the
workmen.
24.
In the case of Haryana State Electricity Board vs. Suresh, 1999 LLJ 1086) Hon’ble Apex Court again dealt with
the question of engagement of contract labour. It was a case where Haryana State Electricity Board had outsourced
work of maintenance of electricity to a private contractor who was not a duly lilcenced contractor under the Contract
Labour & Regulations Act, 1970. The workers engaged had put in more than 240 days in a calendar year and they were
doing the work under supervision and control of the Electricity Board. After discussing the ratio of various authorities
on the subject, Hon’ble Apex Court lifted the veil for determination of real employer-employee relationship and held
that maintenance work is not seasonal work and the employees as a matter of fact were doing work under supervision
of the Board. Even their attendance was being marked by officials of the Board. As such, the said contract was held to
be sham and camouflage. The contractor was held to be merely a name lender or a broker. Thus, it is clear from ratio of
the above authority that the Tribunal has ample power to peep into contract and ascertain the real nature of the work
being done by the employees who are alleged by the management to be employees of the contractor.
25.
Again in BHEL vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2003 Lab.IC 2630 (4) , question of contract labour was considered
by the Hon’ble Apex Court wherein emphasis was laid upon the control test and it was held that where the contract on
the face of it is sham and nominal, rather camouflage, then the workman working in the establishment of the principal
employer, who is having control over the nature of work, in that eventuality, having due regard to the facts and
circumstances of the case, it was held that the workman was directly the employee of the principal employer and not the
contractor.
26.
In the case in hand also, the workman herein was admittedly working in the premises of the principal employer
at Andaman and Nicobar Bhawan, Chanakyapuri and was doing similar work which the other workmen were doing.
This Tribunal cannot ignore the fact that no evidence of the contractor has been led so as to show that the workman
herein was not working since 1999. Rather, employment of the workman herein has been admitted in so many words
indirectly by the management, who has come with the plea that he was in the employment of the contractor and not
directly under the management. There is nothing on record to show that any notice was served on the workman herein
as required under Section 25F of the Act, before his termination, nor there is any direct proof of payment of wages of
one month in lieu of notice. No contractor to whom work was allotted after 1999 till 2010 has been examined by the
management so as to show that the contractor was directly responsible for supervisory control over the workman herein
2352
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
and that he was also paying wages to such workers. Under the CLRA Act, it is the duty of the principal employer to
ensure compliance of various provisions of the Act and Section 21 of the said Act postulates that the contractor shall be
responsible for payment of wages of the workmen and in case contractor fails to make payment of wages within the
prescribed period, then the principal employer shall be liable to make payment of such wages. Thus, termination of the
job of the workman herein also amounts to unfair labour practice, particularly when there is nothing adverse against the
workman since his employment in 1998-99. Work performed by the workman herein is not casual or seasonal in nature
as is clear from pleadings on record. Moreover, the said work is regular and perennial in nature. In such a situation, it
can be concluded that the so called award of work to the various contractors is simply a device invented by the
management to deny the workman herein the status of being directly under the control of the management.
27.
There is no merit in the contention of the management that the workman was not precluded by inviting
application in accordance with law. I have carefully gone through the ratio of judgement in State of Karnataka vs Uma
Devi(supra) and the same is not applicable so far as question of engagement of contract labour through contractor is
concerned.
28.
The learned authorized representative of management No.1 and 2 also relied upon the case of State of
Karnataka vs Uma Devi(1998) SCC 1. I have carefully gone through the ratio of the above authority and the same is not
applicable so far as the question of engagement of contract labour through contractor is concerned. Hon’ble Apex Court
in ONGC vs. Petroleum Coal Labour Union (2015) Lab IC 2483, has considered the ratio in Uma Devi (supra) and held
that even if due procedure was not followed in the appointment of concerned workmen in the post of watch and ward
security, this does not disentitle them of their right to seek regularization of their services by the Corporation under the
provisions of certified standings orders as they have rendered more than 240 days of service in a calendar year from the
date of their appointment in the year 1988. In the said case also, Corporation has outsourced security to private
contractor. However, in 1976, notification was issued for abolition of contract labour for the post of watch and security
men etc. In the said case also strong plea was raised on behalf of the management that in view of ratio of law in Uma
Devi case, workers are not entitled to be regularized after abolition of contract labour. This contention of the
management/Government was rejected by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in ONGC(supra):
‘Uma Devi does not denude the Industrial and Labour Courts of their statutory power under Section 30 read
with Section 32 of the MRTU and PULP Act to order permanency of the workers who have been victims of
unfair labour practice on the part of the employer under Item 6 of Schedule IV where the posts on which they
have been working exist. Umadevi cannot be held to have overridden the powers of the Industrial and Labour
Courts in passing appropriate order under Section 30 of the MRTU and the PULP Act, once unfair labour
practice on the part of the employer under Item 6 of Schedule IV is established.”
29.
There are specific observations in the above judgement that provision of the Industrial Disputes Act and the
powers of the Industrial and Labour Courts were not at all under consideration in Uma Devi case. Issue pertaining to
unfair labour practice was neither the subject matter of decision nor the same was denuded in Uma Devi Case.
Therefore, reliance placed by the management herein upon Uma Dev Case so far as question of contract labour being
sham or camouflage agreement is concerned, is totally misplaced and is of no help to Management No.1 and 2. Since in
the case in hand, engagement of contract labour through private contractor is specifically prohibited in view of the
notification issued by the Central Government, as such deployment of wiremen through so called contractor is held to be
of no use and the said contract as stated above are stated to be legally null and void. Act of the management are means
of unfair labour practice.
30.
Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Ajay Pal Singh vs. Haryana Warehousing Corporation (2015) 6 SC 321
again considered ratio of Uma Devi case (supra) relied upon by the management and held as under:
‘When no such plea is taken by the employer in the order of retrenchment that the workman was appointed in
violation of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India or in violation of any statutory rule or his
appointment was a backdoor appointment, while Page 15 granting relief, the employer cannot take a plea that
initial appointment was in violation of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India, in absence of a reference
made by the appropriate Government for determination of question whether the initial appointment of the
workman was in violation of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India or statutory rules. Only if such
reference is made, a workman is required to lead evidence to prove that he was appointed by following
procedure prescribed under the Rules and his initial appointment was legal.”
31.
Since in the case in hand, there is no reference made by the appropriate Government for determination of the
question whether appointment of the workmen herein is in violation of Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution or their
initial appointment is illegal or against the statutory rule, as such, Uma Devi case is not at all of any legal help to the
case of the management. It is also necessary to mention here that there is ample evidence on record that the workmen
herein were not even being paid minimum wages, which is statutory requirement under the Minimum Wages Act and the
same amounts to commission of unfair labour practice. Net result of the above discussion is that the contracts which
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938
2353
have been referred by Shri M.P. Sharma, Executive Engineer, in his statement, are not of any use so as to hold the
workmen hereunder to be in the employment of the contractor inasmuch as issuance of prohibition notification under
Section 10 of the Contract Labour Act 1970, where post of wiremen is mentioned in the prohibition clause. After
issuance of the above notification, management was required to fill up the post (wiremen) in accordance with rules and
regulations. Management has admitted that still there are some regular workmen working in the department. It also
shows that the work of wiremen is regular and perennial in nature. In such situation, the so called agreements between
the contractor and the management herein are held to be legally void, sham and camouflage so as to bar the workmen
herein from claiming status of being in the employment and control of CPWD.
32.
It is clear from perusal of contracts/agreements Ex.MW1/1 to Ex.MW1/12 that the same were entered between
the Management of CPWD and various contractors from 1999 to 2010, a careful perusal of the which would show that
they are same in every respect. They are standard documents and only name of the contractors from to time has been
changed and all these agreements are admittedly for a period of one year. As already held, the above documents are
simply sham and camouflage so as to deprive the workmen of their status of being directly under employment of the
principal employer, i.e. CPWD, as such, these documents/agreements are even otherwise contrary to the notification,
issued under Section 10 of the Contract Labour Act, 1970, as such legally void. As a result of the above discussion, it is
held that there is no privity of contract between the workmen and CPWD. As such issue No.1 and 2 are decided
against the management and reference is answered in favour of the workman herein.
Issue No.3 - Relief
33.
As a sequitur to my aforesaid discussions, it is held that the workman is entitled to be reinstated after their so
called termination without any notice with effect from 14.10.2009 and payment of back wages with all consequential
benefits since he remained unemployed after his termination on 14.10.2009 till date. An award is accordingly passed.
Let this award be sent to the appropriate Government, as required under Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947,
for publication.
Dated : April 29, 2016
A. C. DOGRA, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 18 ebZ] 2016
dk-vk- 1053.—deZpkjh jkT; chek vfèfu;e] 1948¼1948 dk 34½ dh èkjk&1 dh mi&èkjk ¼3½ }kjk iznRr 'kfDr;ksa dk
iz;ksx djrs gq,] dsUnzh; ljdkj ,rn~}kjk 01 twu] 2016 dks ml rkjh[k ds :i esa fu;r djrh gS] ftldks mDr vfèfu;e ds v/;k;&4 ¼44
o 45 èkjk ds flok; tks igys ls izo`Rr gks pqdh gaS½ v/;k;&5 vkSj 6 [èkjk&76 dh mi èkjk ¼1½ vkSj èkjk &77] 78 79 vkSj 81 ds
flok; tks igys gh izo`Rr dh tk pqdh gaS] ds micaè rsyaxkuk jkT; ds fuEufyf[kr {ks=ksa esa izo`Rr gksaxs] vFkkZr~%
^^le;≤ ij dk;kZfUor fd, x, rsyaxkuk jkT; ds {ks=ksa dks NksM+dj] rsyaxkuk jkT; ds jaxkjsM~Mh ftys ds jktLo xkaoksa ds lHkh
{ks=**
[la- ,l&38013@21@2016&,l-,l-&1]
vt; efyd] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 18th May, 2016
S.O. 1053.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (3) of Section 1 of the Employees' State
Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st June, 2016, as the date on which the
provisions of Chapter IV (except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force) and Chapter-V and VI
[except sub-section (1) of Section 76 and Sections 77, 78, 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force] of the
said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Telangana, namely:—
"All areas falling within the revenue villages of Ranga Reddy District of Telangana State except the areas
which have already been implemented from time to time."
[No. S-38013/21/2016-S.S.-I]
AJAY MALIK, Under Secy.
ubZ fnYyh] 18 ebZ] 2016
dk-vk- 1054.—deZpkjh jkT; chek vfèfu;e] 1948¼1948 dk 34½ dh èkjk&1 dh mi&èkjk ¼3½ }kjk iznRr 'kfDr;ksa dk
iz;ksx djrs gq,] dsUnzh; ljdkj ,rn~}kjk 01 twu] 2016 dks ml rkjh[k ds :i esa fu;r djrh gS] ftldks mDr vfèfu;e ds v/;k;&IV
2354
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
¼44 o 45 èkjk ds flok; tks igys ls izo`Rr gks pqdh gaS½ v/;k;& V vkSj VI [èkjk&76 dh mi èkjk ¼1½ vkSj èkjk &77] 78 79 vkSj 81
ds flok; tks igys gh izo`Rr dh tk pqdh gaS] ds micaè >kj[kaM jkT; ds fuEufyf[kr {ks=ksa esa izo`Rr gksaxs] uker~%%&
Ø-la-
ftyk dk uke
1-
jk¡ph
2-
jkex<+
3-
fxfjMhg
4-
dksMjek
5-
cksdkjks
6-
nso?kj
7-
ljk;dsyk&[kjlkok¡
8-
iwohZ ¯lgHkwe
9-
/kuckn
[lañ ,l&38013@20@2016&,l-,l-&1]
vt; efyd] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 18th May, 2016
S.O. 1054.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (3) of Section 1 of the Employees' State
Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st June, 2016, as the date on which the
provisions of Chapter IV (except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force) and Chapter-V and VI
[except sub-section (1) of Section 76 and Sections 77, 78, 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force] of the
said Act shall come into force in the following entire district (including already implemented) areas in the State of
Jharkhand, namely:—
Sl. No. Name of the District
1.
Ranchi
2.
Ramgarh
3.
Girdih
4.
Kderma
5.
Bokaro
6.
Deoghar
7.
Saraikella-Kharsawan
8.
East Singhbhum
9.
Dhanbad
[No. S-38013/20/2016-S.S.-I]
AJAY MALIK, Under Secy.
ubZ fnYyh] 25 ebZ] 2016
dk-vk- 1055-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ
chchlh,y ds izcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- 1] /uckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 03@2001) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 25-05-2016 dks
izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&20012@111@2000&vkbZvkj (lh,e&I)]
,e- ds- ¯lg] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 25th May, 2016
S.O. 1055.— In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government
hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1, Dhanbad
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938
2355
(Ref. No. 03 of 2001) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the
management of M/s. BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 25.05.2016.
[No. L-20012/111/2000-IR(CM-I)]
M. K. SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO. 1) DHANBAD
In the matter of reference U/s 10(1)(d)(2A) of I.D. Act, 1947
Ref. No. 03 of 2001
Employer in relation to the management of P.B. Area of M/s. BCCL
And
Their Workmen
Present : Sri Ranjan Kumar Saran, Presiding Officer
Appearances :
For the Employers
:
Shri D.K. Verma, Advocate
For the Workman
:
None
State : Jharkhand
Industry : Coal
Dated : 23.11.2015
AWARD
By Order No. L-20012/111/2000-IR(CM-I), dated 18.12.2000, the Central Government in the Ministry of
Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of
the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947, referred the following disputes for adjudication to this Tribunal :
SCHEDULE
“Whether the demand of the Union to provide employment to Shri Dukhan S/o Sri Remeshwar Mandal from
the management of P.B. Area M/s. BCCL, P.O. Kusunda, Dist. Dhanbad in terms of Award in Ref. 71/85 is
proper and justified? If so, to what relief is the person concerned entitled?”
2.
After receipt of the reference, parties are noticed, though they took steps for certain dates, subsequently did not
take any interest in the case by the workman. It is presumed that the disputes between parties have been resolved in the
meantime. Hence, No Dispute Award is passed.
R. K. SARAN, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 25 ebZ] 2016
dk-vk- 1056-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj ,lbZlh,y
ds izcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 85@2012) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 25-05-2016 dks izkIr
gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&22012@87@2012&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)]
jktsUæ ¯lg] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 25th May, 2016
S.O. 1056.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 85/2012) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of SECL Hq., Seepat Road,
2356
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Bilaspur, Central Excavation Workshop of SECL and their workmen, received by the Central Government on
25.05.2016.
[No. L-22012/87/2012-IR (CM-II)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/85/12
The President/ Secretary,
Bhartiya Koyla Khadan Mazdoor Sangthan (BMS),
Gevra Area, PO Gevra Project,
Distt. Korba, CG.
…Workman/ Union
Versus
General Manager,
Central Excavation Workshop of SECL,
Gevra Area, PO Gevra Project,
Korba, CG
…Management
AWARD
Passed on this 7th day of April 2016
1. As per letter dated 25-7-12 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is received.
The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.L-22012/87/2012-
IR(CM-II). The dispute under reference relates to:
“Whether the action of the General Manager, Central Excavation workshop of SECL, Gevra, Distt. Korba
(CG) in not giving the 16 holidays ( i.e. 8 paid holidays, 6 gazetted holidays and 2 Restricted holidays) and half
day working on satyurday to their employees working in CEWS, Gevra as that of given to Central Workshop
SECL, Korba is legal, proper and justified? To what relief the said workman is entitled and from what date/
period?”
2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to the parties. Workman failed to appear in the reference proceeding.
Workman was proceeded exparte on 28-3-2015.
3. 2nd party filed exparte Written Statement. Case of 2nd party is that Union raised present dispute demanding 16
holidays ( 8 paid holidays, 6 gazetted holidays, 2 RH)and half day working on Saturday in CWS Gevra Project. That the
demand made by Union is incorrect and denied. Central Workshop is of SECL. The employees in said workshop are
under control of General Manager of workshop. It is independent unit of SECL. The workshop is under administrative
and functional control of Chief General Manager excavation as per office order dated 31-8-02. The service conditions of
employees working in SECL are covered by certified standing orders. The certified standing orders applicable to SECL
Clause 11 provides that there shall be 8 paid festival holidays. Out of these 8 days, the Republic day, Miners day,
independence day and Mahatma Gandhi Birthday shall be allowed without option and remaining paid holidays shall be
fixed by agreement or local custom. Present practice in respect of Festival Holidays will however continue. That 16
holidays at Central Workshop Korba are restricted to only few employees as Executive and Monthly Staff of
Administrative Building of Central Workshop Korba and majority of executives staff and all daily rated workers
engaged in production in various shops get only 8 paid holidays.. w.r.t. half working day at CEWS Gevra is not
violating any rules or regulations in taking 8 hours work from employees at CEWS Gevra on Saturdays.
4. The coal mines were owned by private owners. The coal mines were nationalized to provide for the acquisition and
transfer of rights, title and interest of the owners in respect of coal mines specified in the schedule with a view to re
organizing and reconstructing such coal mines so as to ensure the rational coordinated and scientific development and
utilization of coal resources. For the purpose of proper administration and operation of the mines a company namely
Coal India Ltd is constituted which is a Govt of India undertaking having its 6 subsidiary companies, WCL, SECL,
Central Coalfields Ltd. BCCL, Eastern Coalfields Ltd. And NCL. The Central Govt. constituted a Central Wage Board
for Coal Industry. Both the workman and management appeared before the Wage Board and after examining the cases of
both parties, Wage Board submitted its recommendations fixing service conditions of employees and wages. The
service conditions of employees in the Industry is governed by the Wage Board Recommendations as accepted by the
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938
2357
Central Govt. There are more than 5 lacs of employees working in the coal industry in the State of Assam, Bengal,
Bihar, Orissa, UP, MP and Maharashtra. NCDC was a public sector company. Government colliery followed the
central Govt. Pay scale and working pattern which resulted in following Central Govt. pattern of working hours and
holidays. Due to some misunderstanding, ignorance and oversight in some collieries of NCDC a wrong working hours of
clerical staff were adopted as 6 hours and holidays were given on government pattern. It was stopped after
nationalization but some of the government companies taken over by NCDC service conditions were protected under
certain understanding as per agreement. The protection was some time misunderstood creating a wrong working hours
and holidays for some of the employees in NCDC Mines. That thousands of workers who were working 8 hours a day
and having 8 holidays protested against the illegal benefit given for few selected workers. It was necessary to have
common working hours, the service conditions, pay, service working in the same industry. Any discrimination is
impermissible. There can be no justification for giving favour/ advantage to selected workman. The universal practice in
India and other countries is of 8 hours working 48 hours in a week. The service conditions of employees working in
coal industry are covered by NCWA. For implementation of provisions of NCWA, there is a committee known as
JBCCI. Said committee is consisting of equal strength of members of recognized Central Trade Union and management.
The forum of JBCCI meant for making policy decision in respect of entire coal industry. The issue about working hours
discussed in the Committee on 3-6-88, 2-9-88 by representative of Union and management. The management
summarized the stand that enforcement of mandatory provisions of Mine Act Regulation notice under Section 9-A of
IDS Act and doesnot amount to change in service conditions. The employees covered under wage board are given
enhanced benefit under NCWA like LTC, LLTC, free supply of fuel, electricity, special leave for six months to those
who suffer from TB, Cancer, Leprosy etc. and benefits under social security scheme. The number of paid holidays in
each 9 establishment is restricted to 8 days as per NCWA.
5. 2nd party has also referred to NCWA-I – 1975, NCWA-III – 1983 leave and festival holidays continued as at
present. Vide clause 6.6 of NCWA-3, it was agreed that 7 paid holidays, Ist day of every year as paid holidays total 8
holidays. In NCWA-IV 1987, existing 8 national holidays will continue as at present.. it is reiterated that 8 paid holidays
were allowed which included Republic Day, Miners Day, Independence day and Birthday of Mahatma Gandhi without
option and remaining 4 paid holidays were to be allowed as per agreement. That the service conditions of employees
also provides for 8 paid holidays only the demand of Union for 16/18 holidays has no merit. On such ground, 2nd party
prays to answer reference in its favour.
6. Considering pleadings on record, the points which arise for my consideration and determination are as under. My
findings are recorded against each of them for the reasons as below:-
(i) Whether the action of the General Manager, Central
Excavation workshop of SECL, Gevra, Distt. Korba
(CG) in not giving the 16 holidays ( i.e. 8 paid holidays,
6 gazetted holidays and 2 Restricted holidays) and half
day working on satyurday to their employees working in
CEWS, Gevra as that of given to Central Workshop
SECL, Korba is legal, proper and justified?
In Affirmative
(ii) If not, what relief the workman is entitled to?”
Workmen are not entitled to any relief.
REASONS
7. Ist party Union did not participate in reference, it was proceeded exparte on 25-3-2015. Exparte Written Statement
is filed by management. Affidavit of evidence of management’s witness Shri G.L.N.Durga Prasad is filed supporting
contentions of management in Written Statement.
8. Management’s witness has reiterated that as per NCWA & wage board recommendations, the service conditions of
the employees are covering the benefit of 8 paid holidays are allowed. The evidence of management’s witness remained
unchallenged as Ist party workman failed to participate in reference proceeding, I find no reason to discard evidence of
management’s witness. As Ist party failed to file statement of claim or adduce evidence in support of the dispute raised
by it, I record my finding in Point No.1 in Affirmative.
9. In the result, award is passed as under:-
(1)
The action of the management is proper and legal.
(2)
Workman is not entitled to any relief.
R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer
2358
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ubZ fnYyh] 25 ebZ] 2016
dk-vk- 1057-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj bZlh,y ds
izcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k@Je
U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 06@2010) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 25-05-2016 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&22012@50@2009&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)]
jktsUæ ¯lg] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 25th May, 2016
S.O. 1057.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 06/2010) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Kumardihi A Colliery of
M/s. ECL and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 25.05.2016.
[No. L-22012/50/2009-IR (CM-II)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL
PRESENT:
Sri Pramod Kumar Mishra, Presiding Officer
REFERENCE NO. 06 OF 2010
PARTIES:
The management of Kumardihi ‘A’ Colliery of M/s. ECL.
Vs.
Sri Ghena Pradhan & 14 others
REPRESENTATIVES:
For the management
:
Sri P. K. Das, Ld. Advocate
For the union (Workman)
:
Sri Sushil Banerjee
INDUSTRY: COAL
STATE : WEST BENGAL
Dated: 02.05.2016
AWARD
In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-section(1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947), Govt. of India through the Ministry of Labour vide its letter NO. L-
22012/50/2009-IR(CM-II) dated 21.01.2010 has been pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by this
Tribunal.
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of Kumardihi A Colliery under Bankola Area of M/s. Eastern
Coalfields Limited, in denying group wages of Piece Rated Trammers w.e.f. 29.11.2005 till regularization i.e.
16.08.2008 to Sri Ghena Pradhan & 14 others (as per list enclosed) is legal and justified? To what relief is the
workman concerned entitled? ”
1.
Having received the Order NO. L-22012/50/2009-IR(CM-II) dated 21.01.2010 of the above said reference
from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference case No. 06 of 2010
was registered on 11.02.2010 and accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through the registered
post to the parties concerned directing them to appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their written statements
along with the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance of the said order
notices by the registered post were sent to the parties concerned.
2.
Case called out. Sri P. K. Das, learned advocate is present on behalf of the management but none appears on
behalf of the workmen / union.
3.
On perusal of the case record, I find that the workmen / union last appeared before the Tribunal on 26.06.2013.
Thereafter more than 2½ (Two and a half) years and 13 (Thirteen) dates have passed but neither the workmen nor the
union appeared before the Tribunal to contest the case. Registered notice was issued to the union on 12.08.2014 and
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938
2359
seven more dates were granted after the notice but none appeared to represent the workmen or union. It seems that the
union/workmen do not want to proceed with the case further. As such the case is closed and a ‘No Dispute Award’ is
hereby passed accordingly.
ORDER
Let an “Award” be and same is passed as no dispute existing. Send the copies of the order to the Govt.
of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, for information and needful. The reference is accordingly disposed of.
PRAMOD KUMAR MISHRA, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 25 ebZ] 2016
dk-vk- 1058-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj bZlh,y ds
izcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k@Je
U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 09@2008) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 25-05-2016 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&22012@02@2008&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)]
jktsUæ ¯lg] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 25th May, 2016
S.O. 1058.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 09/2008) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Dhanbad Colliery of
M/s. ECL and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 25.05.2016.
[No. L-22012/02/2008-IR (CM-II)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL
PRESENT:
Sri Pramod Kumar Mishra, Presiding Officer
REFERENCE NO. 06 OF 2010
PARTIES:
The management of Dalurband Colliery of M/s. E.C.L.
Vs.
Sri Upendra Bhuia
REPRESENTATIVES:
For the management
:
Sri P. K. Goswami, Ld. Advocate
For the union (Workman)
:
Sri S. K. Pandey, Gen. Secy. (CMC)
INDUSTRY : COAL
STATE : WEST BENGAL
Dated : 10.05.2016
AWARD
In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-section(1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947), Govt. of India through the Ministry of Labour vide its letter NO. L-
22012/2/2008–IR(CM-II) dated 11.03.2008 has been pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by this
Tribunal.
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of M/s. ECL in dismissing Sri Upendra Bhuia w.e.f. 20.10.2004 is
legal and justified? If not, to what relief is the workman entitled? ”
1. Having received the Order NO. L-22012/2/2008–IR(CM-II) dated 11.03.2008 of the above said reference from
the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference case No. 09 of 2008 was
registered on 17.03.2008. Accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through the registered post to
2360
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
the parties concerned, directing them to appear in the court, on the date fixed and to file their written statements along
with the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance of the said order notices by
the registered post were sent to the parties concerned. Both the parties appeared in the Tribunal, through their
representative.
2.
The workman Sri Upendra Bhuiya has in brief, stated in his written statement that he was in employment of the
company as Trammer at Dalurband Colliery under Pandeswar Area of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited. Due to his
sickness he was absent from duty w.e.f 17.02.2004. The management issued him Charge Sheet vide Charge Sheet No.
DBC/CS/47/87 dated 06/07.04.2004. The Charge Sheet and Enquiry Notice was not served to workman. But enquiry
was completed ex-parte without giving him any opportunity to defend himself, ignoring the principal of natural justice.
The service of the workman was dismissed w.e.f. 20.10.2004 without serving him 2nd Show Cause Notice. The workman
is sitting idle without any employment till date. Dismissal of Sri Upendra Bhuiya form the service of the company is
illegal and unjustified. The workman has prayed that the tribunal may kindly direct the management of Dalurband
Colliery under Pandeswar Area of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited to reinstate the workman in service with payment of
full back wages from the period of dismissal with all consequential benefits.
3.
The Agent of Dalurband Colliery of Pandeswar Area of M/s. Eastern Coalfields has stated in his written
statement, in brief that Mr. Bhuiya was found absent from 17.02.2004 without any reasons. For unauthorized absence as
well as due to habitual absence under clause 26.5, 26.23 and 26.29 of Standing Order applicable to the colliery Mr.
Bhuiya was charge sheeted. In the year 2000 the attendance was marked for 55 days, in 2001 for 14 days, in 2002
attendance was 85 days and in 2003 his attendance was 83 days. His performance was very bad therefore he was
awarded lenient punishment deducting at least 28 SPRA. Mr. Bhuiya did not reply to the charge sheet issued to him.
Management conducted domestic enquiry. But even after receiving the notice of enquiry he did not appear therefore the
enquiry was conducted ex-parte. From the Enquiry Report & other materials the charges levelled against him
were proved. Management having no other alternative terminated the services of Mr. Bhuiya. Punishment of dismissal
took place due to latches of concerned workman. The agent of Dalurband Colliery under Pandeswar Area of M/s.
Eastern Coalfields Limited has prayed the action of management in dismissing Mr. Bhuiya is justified and legal.
Workman is not entitled to any relief.
4.
Neither party to reference has filed any documentary evidence. The workman Sri Upendra Bhuiya has filed
affidavit dated 10.01.2013 in his oral evidence. He has been cross-examined by learned Advocate of M/s. Eastern
Coalfields Limited. The agent Dalurband Colliery under Pandeswar Area of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has not
filed any affidavit in his oral evidence.
5.
The reference belongs to year 2008. Notice was served on Dalurband Colliery under Pandeswar Area of M/s.
Eastern Coalfields Limited. The learned advocate of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited appeared on 13.05.2010. After
appearance of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited through advocate, even after fixing more than 30 dates M/s. Eastern
Coalfields Limited did not care to file authorization of his advocate. On 20.01.2015 the tribunal directed the
management to file authorization of his advocate and copy of Enquiry Proceeding, Enquiry Report, and Dismissal Order
and fixed 24.02.2015 as last chance. On 24.02.2015 and five dates thereafter M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited neither
files any documents regarding domestic enquiry nor authorization of his advocate. Since M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited
has precluded himself to be represented by an advocate tribunal has no option but to proceed further. Tribunal reserved
the reference for order. The union representative was present. The reference is being decided on merit.
6.
It is not disputed that Sri Upendra Bhuiya was in employment of the company as Trammer at Dalurband
Colliery under Pandeswar Area of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited. It is admitted fact that Sri Upendra Bhuiya was
dismissed from service w.e.f. 20.10.2004 by M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited. As per allegation of the workman Sri
Upendra Bhuiya the domestic enquiry was conducted against the workman ex-parte without any service of notice. He
was not afforded any opportunity to defend himself. Enquiry was conducted in violation of Principle of Natural Justice.
7.
At very outset, it is necessary to mention that M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has not filed any documentary
evidence regarding domestic enquiry. The Tribunal has provided ample opportunity to file copy of Enquiry Proceeding,
Enquiry Report, Dismissal Order and all relevant document connected with the domestic enquiry. But even after so
many dates M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited did not prefer to file even a single document in connection with the
domestic enquiry against Sri Upendra Bhuiya, the delinquent workman. If any document is in possession of any party
and in spite of direction of Tribunal or Court he does not file copy of those documents, which are very much relevant for
just decision of the reference, the tribunal is bound to draw adverse inference u/s 114(G) of Evidence Act against the
party withholding the documents. Since M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has failed to file copies of Enquiry Proceeding,
Enquiry Report, Dismissal Order, Charge Sheet, Reply of Workman, Notice of Enquiry which are in possession of M/s.
Eastern Coalfields Limited. it will be presumed that either there was no enquiry at all or if enquiry was conducted
against workman, it was vitiated due to non compliance of Principle of Natural Justice as alleged by workman.
8.
In Gopal Krishnaji Ketkar v/s Md. Haji Latif and others, AIR 1968 SC 1413, the Hon’ble Apex Court has held
that ;
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938
2361
“ Even if the burden of proof does not lay on a party the Court may draw an adverse inference if he withholds
important documents in his possession which can throw light on the facts at issue.”
9.
The workman has stated in his affidavit that he was a permanent and bona fide employee of M/s. Eastern
Coalfields Limited and posted at Dalurband Colliery under Pandeswar Area bearing designation as Trammer, U.M. No.-
741728. He was never issued any Charge Sheet or Enquiry Notice. He was dismissed from service illegally without
giving any opportunity to defend himself. After recovery from illness he was not allowed to join his duty. He belonged
to Schedule Cast community. His condition was very poor. At present he was without any income. For livelihood he
intends to join duty under M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited. Though, without filing authorization on behalf of M/s.
Eastern Coalfields Limited the learned advocate of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has cross-examined the workman,
Sri Upendra Bhuiya. The workman has not stated any fact in his cross-examination repugnant to the statement contained
in his affidavit. There is no reason to disbelieve the statement of the workman stated on oath.
10.
The agent, Dalurband Colliery under Pandeswar Area of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has stated in Para-6
of his written statement that even after receiving the notice of enquiry the workman did not appear as a result of which
the enquiry was conducted ex-parte. But there is no evidence on record to support this allegation. There is no
documentary evidence that when notice was sent to the workman and on which date it was served on concerned
workman. Even there is no evidence that in fact any notice was sent to the workman or whether the workman was kept
informed for the proposed enquiry. Even if the enquiry was conducted ex-parte there is no copy of document of enquiry
proceeding to substantiate the allegation of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited.
11.
In A. K. Kraipak v/s Union of India AIR 1970 SC 150 the Hon’ble Supreme Court has held that;
“ The aim of the rules of natural justice is to secure justice or to put it negatively to prevent miscarriage of
justice. These rules can operate only in areas not covered by any law validly made. In other words they do not
supplant the law of the land but supplement it. The concept of natural justice has undergone a great deal of
change in recent years. In the past it was thought that it included just two rules namely (1) no one shall be a
judge in his own case (Nemo debet esse judex propria causa) and (2) no decision shall be given against a party
without affording him a reasonable hearing (audi alteram partem). Very soon, a third rule was envisaged and
that is that quasi judicial enquiries must be held in good faith, without bias and not arbitrarily or unreasonably
and it went on to hold;
‘ If the purpose of the rules of natural justice is to prevent miscarriage of justice one fails to see why those rules
should be made inapplicable to administrative enquiries. Often times it is not easy to draw the line that
demarcates administrative enquiries from quasi judicial enquiries. Enquiries which were considered
administrative at one time are now being considered as quasi judicial in character. Arriving at a just decision is
the aim of both quasi judicial enquiries as well as administrative enquiries. An unjust decision in an
administrative enquiry may have more far reaching effect than a decision in a quasi-judicial enquiry’. ”
12.
In State of U.P. v/s Saroj Kumar Sinha 2010 (124) FLR 857 the Hon’ble Apex Court has held that;
“ Enquiry officer acting in a quasi judicial authority is in the position of an independent adjudicator. He is not
supposed to be a representative of the department / Government. His function is to examine the evidence
presented by the department, even in the absence of the delinquent official to see as to whether the unrebutted
evidence is sufficient to hold that the charges are proved.”
13.
So far as previous absence is concerned, it is settled law that if past record of a government servant, if it is
intended to be relied upon by imposing a punishment then there should be specific charge in the first stage of enquiry
itself. If it is not done, so it cannot be relied upon after the enquiry is closed and the report is submitted to the authority
entitled to impose the punishment. The punishing authority cannot impose punishment for previous record if the
delinquent employee has not been charge sheeted for previous record.
14.
Every industry or establishment laid down certain rules and regulation apart from government’s rules and
regulation for better, effective and efficient working of an industry. For such purpose an industry also constitutes its own
rules as per the provision of labour and industrial laws so as to punish those employees who commits any wrong or
misconduct under the course of employment. Disciplinary proceedings will judge the degree and consequences of
misconduct committed by an employee. In deciding whether in a particular case an act of misconduct is serious enough
to justify the dismissal, the matter needs to be examined in the light of all the surrounding circumstances. But before
reaching to this conclusion a fair and bona fide domestic enquiry is pre-condition. The compliance of natural justice is
foremost requirement of domestic enquiry which has not been complied in the present reference.
15.
In Deepali Gundu Surwase v/s Kranti Junior Adhyapak Mahavidyalaya (D.Ed.) and others 2013 LAB. I.C.
4249 the Hon’ble Supreme Court has held that;
“ Ordinarily, an employee or workman whose services are terminated and who is desirous of getting back
wages is required to either plead or at least make a statement before the adjudicating authority or the Court of
first instance that he/she was not gainfully employed or was employed on lesser wages. If the employer wants
2362
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
to avoid payment of full back wages, then it has to plead and also lead cogent evidence to prove that the
employee / workman was gainfully employed and was getting wages equal to the wages he / she was drawing
prior to the termination of service. This is so because it is settled law that the burden of proof of the existence of
a particular fact lies on the person who makes a positive averment about its existence. It is always easier to
prove a positive fact than to prove a negative fact. Therefore, once the employee shows that he was not
employed, the onus lies on the employer to specifically plead and prove that the employee was gainfully
employed and was getting the same or substantially similar emoluments.”
16.
The workman has pleaded in Para-6 of his written statement that “the workman is sitting idle without any
employment till date”. In Para-8 of his affidavit the workman has stated that at present he is without any income. The
workman has pleaded that during period of dismissal he was not gainfully employed anywhere else. M/s. Eastern
Coalfields Limited has not rebutted this fact in his written statement nor files any oral or documentary evidence on this
fact.
17.
In Deepali Gundu Surwase v/s Kranti Junior Adhyapak Mahavidyalaya (D.Ed.) and others 2013 LAB. I.C.
4249 the Hon’ble Supreme Court has held that;
“ Cases in which the tribunal finds that the employer has acted in gross violation of the statutory provision or
the principal of natural justice or is guilty of victimizing the employee or workman, then the concerned Court or
Tribunal will be fully justified in directing payment of full back wages. The courts must keep in view that in
cases of wrongful/illegal termination of service the wrongdoer is the employer and the sufferer is the employee/
workman and there is no justification to give premium to the employer of his wrongdoings by relieving him of
the burden to pay to the employee / workman his dues in the form of full back wages.”
18.
The workman, Sri Upendra Bhuiya was dismissed w.e.f. 20.10.2004. The workman in his affidavit dated
10.01.2013 has stated his age 50 years. It indicates that he has not reached up to the age of superannuation. Had he not
been dismissed from service he would have been in service at present. At this age there is no possibility for any
dismissed workman to get alternate job. Therefore in view of law propounded by Hon’ble Apex Court the workman is
entitled for full back wages from date of dismissal i.e. from 20.10.2004 till his reinstatement with continuity in service
and all consequential service benefits.
19.
In view of above discussion the action of management of M/s. Eastern Coalfields in dismissing Sri Upendra
Bhuiya w.e.f. 20.10.2004 is illegal and unjustified. The order of dismissal of management of M/s. Eastern Coalfields
dated 20.10.2004 is hereby set-a-side. The management of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited is directed to reinstate Sri
Upendra Bhuiya in service and is further directed to pay full back wages from date of dismissal i.e. 20.10.2004 till date
of reinstatement with continuity of service. It is further directed that Sri Upendra Bhuiya will get all consequential
service benefits e.g. increment, promotion etc. Sri Upendra Bhuiya will be punished with stoppage of two annual
increments without cumulative effect, for his unauthorized absence. The order will be enforced within Two months after
publication under section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
ORDER
Let an “Award” be and the same is passed as per above discussion. Send the copies of the order to the Govt. of
India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for information and needful. The reference is accordingly disposed of.
PRAMOD KUMAR MISHRA, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 25 ebZ] 2016
dk-vk- 1059-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj bZlh,y ds
izcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k@Je
U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 84@2006) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 25-05-2016 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&22012@59@2006&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)]
jktsUæ ¯lg] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 25th May, 2016
S.O. 1059.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 84/2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Lachipur Colliery of
M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 25.05.2016.
[No. L-22012/59/2006-IR (CM-II)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938
2363
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL
PRESENT:
Sri Pramod Kumar Mishra, Presiding Officer
REFERENCE NO. 84 OF 2006
PARTIES:
The management of Lachipur Colliery of M/s. E.C.L.
Vs.
Sri Chanda Majhi
REPRESENTATIVES:
For the management
:
Sri P. K. Goswami, Ld. Advocate
For the union (Workman)
:
Sri P. C. Pandey, V.P. (KMC)
INDUSTRY : COAL
STATE : WEST BENGAL
Dated : 12.05.2016
AWARD
In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-section(1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947), Govt. of India through the Ministry of Labour vide its letter NO. L-
22012/59/2006–IR(CM-II) dated 30.10.2006 has been pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by this
Tribunal.
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of Lachipur Colliery under Kajora Area of M/s. ECL in dismissing
Sri Chanda Majhi from services w.e.f. 22.11.1999 is legal and justified? If not, to what relief is the workman
entitled? ”
1.
Having received the Order NO. L-22012/59/2006–IR(CM-II) dated 30.10.2006 of the above said reference
from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference case No. 84 of 2006
was registered on 11.12.2006. Accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through the registered post
to the parties concerned, directing them to appear in the court, on the date fixed and to file their written statements along
with the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance of the said order notices by
the registered post were sent to the parties concerned. Both the parties appeared in the Tribunal, through their
representative.
2.
The workman Sri Chanda Majhi, in brief, has stated in his written statement that he is member of Schedule
Tribe. He was working as Driller bearing U.M. No. 058813. Sri Chanda Majhi due to his acute sickness did not attend
duty from 06.09.1998 to 18.02.1999. He is illiterate person so he did not inform the colliery authority. The workman
neither received any charge sheet from the colliery. Nor notice of enquiry from Enquiry Officer. But he has been
illegally dismissed by the authority on the basis of ex-parte enquiry. The workman is out of employment since the date
of his dismissal. He has no source of livelihood and therefore his family is facing complete starvation. The punishment
of dismissal is unjust and improper. The workman has prayed that the Tribunal may direct the authority to reinstate the
workman by setting aside the order of dismissal. The workman has also prayed that he should be reinstated with back
wages with all consequential benefits.
3.
On other hand the Agent of Lacchipur Colliery under Kajora Area of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited, in brief,
has stated in his written statement that Sri Chanda Majhi Ex-Driller of Lacchipur Colliery under Kajora Area of
M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited was charge sheeted by the management vide charge sheet no. ECL/LAC/P&IR/C-
6/7221 dated 18.02.1999 for his unauthorized absent from duty from 06.09.1998 without any prior permission or
sanctioned leave. The above charge sheet was duly sent to the home address of the workman. But the workman failed to
submit his explanation to the above charge sheet. Therefore domestic enquiry was held into the said charge sheet. The
Enquiry Officer issued due notice of enquiry under registered post with A/D to home address of delinquent workman.
But in spite of due service of notice of enquiry, workman failed to appear before Enquiry Office. Therefore enquiry was
held ex-parte on 29.09.1999. After conclusion of enquiry, Enquiry Officer held the workman guilty for charges framed
under 17(i)(d) and 17(i)(n) of model standing order. Management issued 2nd Show Cause notice vide Ref. No.
KA:PM:C-6:10:3015 dated 27.10.1999 / 01.11.1999 but the workman did not submit any reply to the same. After
perusal of Charge Sheet, Enquiry Proceeding, Enquiry Report and past record of the workman the management was fully
satisfied. The management passed the dismissal order vide Ref. No. KM:PM:C-6:10:3271 dated 19.11.1999. The Agent
of Lacchipur Colliery under Kajora Area of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has denied that workman could not attend
2364
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
his duty from 06.09.1998 to 18.02.1999 due to sickness. The management has denied that the ex-workman did not
receive Charge Sheet or Notice of Enquiry. Management has denied that ex-workman has been illegally dismissed from
service without giving any opportunity to defend himself. Management has denied that ex-workman is out of
employment from date of dismissal or that the punishment of dismissal is just and proper. The workman is not entitled to
any relief.
4.
M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has filed 6 document in his documentary evidence:- (i) Copy of Charge Sheet,
(ii) Copy of Enquiry Proceedings, (iii) Copy of Enquiry Report, (iv) Copy of Appointment of Enquiry Officer, (v) Copy
of 2nd Show Cause Notice, (vi) Copy of Order of Dismissal. M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has not filed any oral
evidence. The workman has filed affidavit in his oral evidence he has been cross-examined by the learned advocate of
M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited.
5.
I have heard Sri P. C. Pandey, learned Union representative on behalf of workman and Sri P. K. Das, learned
Advocate on behalf of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited.
6.
Sri P. C. Pandey argued that for mere absence of 5 months which was under compelling circumstances due to
illness of workman the punishment of dismissal is too harsh. He has argued that workman was never served with Charge
Sheet. He was never informed about the date and place of enquiry. He was never afforded opportunity to defend himself.
There is no compliance of Natural Justice. Sri P. K. Das has argued that the workman is bound by Model Standing
Order. He cannot remain absent for more than 10 days without any prior permission or leave. He has been rightly
punished for unauthorized absence.
7.
It is not disputed that delinquent workman Sri Chanda Majhi was an employee under Lacchipur Colliery under
Kajora Area of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited. It is also not disputed that he has been dismissed from service w.e.f.
22.11.1999. The workman has alleged that he was absent from duty due to his sickness from 06.09.1998 to 12.02.1999.
He has alleged that a domestic enquiry was conducted ex-parte without any service of notice to him. There is denial of
Natural Justice. He has not been afforded opportunity to defend himself. Whereas the Agent of Lacchipur Colliery under
Kajora Area of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has alleged that Sri Chanda Majhi was unauthorized absent for which
enquiry was conducted and notice was served on workman. But the workman did not attend the enquiry proceeding.
Therefore enquiry proceeded ex-parte against the workman.
8.
I have perused the Enquiry Proceeding, Enquiry Report and all relevant papers available on the file of
reference. The workman was issued Charge Sheet. The Enquiry Officer has mentioned that notice of enquiry has been
sent to Sri Chanda Majhi after service of Charge Sheet. But there is no document regarding sending of Notice of
Enquiry. There is no Postal Receipt. There is no evidence on which date the Notice of Enquiry was received by the
delinquent workman. Though Agent of Lacchipur Colliery under Kajora Area of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has
stated in his written statement that registered Acknowledgement Due notice was sent to the home address of the
workman, but neither Acknowledgement Due nor Postal Receipt is filed on record. Only by Postal Receipt or
Acknowledgement Due it can be confirmed that Notice of Enquiry and Charge Sheet has been served. In enquiry
proceeding, the enquiry office had adjourned the proceeding for absence of Sri Chanda Majhi on enquiry date. But it has
never been mentioned or observed that the Notice of Enquiry or service of Charge Sheet was really received by the
delinquent workman Sri Chanda Majhi. Though the departmental enquiry proceeded ex-parte against the delinquent
workman. But before proceeding ex-pate the Enquiry Officer is duty bound to ensure that before proceeding Notice of
Enquiry was actually served. The enquiry officer is an independent person. He is supposed to conduct domestic enquiry
impartially in fare and independent manner. The burden to establish and prove the charge against the delinquent
workman is on the employer. If the employer prove the misconduct of employee by fair and valid domestic enquiry then
burden shifts to employee to prove his innocence.
9.
The Hon’ble Allahabad High Court in Divisional Railway Manager, Northern Railway, Lucknow and others v/s
Salig Ram Mandal, 2014 (140) FLR 694 has held that;
“That enquiry officer is an independent person and is not a brief holder of the department of a quasi judicial
authority. He has to follow the procedure and observe the principles of evidence for proving the documents
submitted by the department in enquiry against the employee. The Hon’ble Allahabad High Court has held that
departmental proceeding is like proceeding like court. Burden of proof lies on the department which can only
be proved by collecting evidence and proving of the documentary evidence by oral evidence.”
10.
After conclusion of enquiry on receipt of Enquiry Report the delinquent workman ought to have been supplied
copy of Enquiry Report and all connected papers relied on by the Enquiry Officer. But from perusal of 2nd Show Cause
Notice it is apparent that delinquent workman was supplied with only finding of Enquiry Officer. Sri Chanda Majhi, the
delinquent workman was never supplied with full and complete copy of proceeding of Domestic Enquiry. At the cost of
repetition it is relevant to mention the delinquent workman was absent during enquiry proceeding. Therefore the
statement of witness and the report of the department ought to have been supplied to the delinquent workman.
11.
Hon’ble Supreme Court in Uttaranchal and others v/s Sri Kharak Singh, 2008 (118) FLR, 1112 has held that;
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938
2365
“ On receipt of the Enquiry Report, before proceeding further, it is incumbent on the part of the disciplinary /
punishing authority to supply a copy of the enquiry report and all connected materials relied on by the Enquiry
Officer to enable him to officer his views, if any.”
12.
From the olden time, the labour class has always been subjected to subjugation by the capital class. Being a
labour and poor thereof used to be considered as a curse on human being. As society developed and as we entered into
the arena of twentieth century, deep voice of protection of labour’s right from illegitimate and uncontrolled act was
raised. Considering the need of the hour, government enacted certain labour legislation and the objects of those
legislation was to provide harmonize and fear free environment for working labours and employees. However such laws
have not been enacted to provide complete immunity to labours and they cannot shield themselves behind the curtain for
their misconduct. So as to balance both parties and situation, the government has incorporated certain provision relating
to keep check and balance on the activities of the employees and employer. There is no specific procedure prescribed in
Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 and other rules made under therein, which should be complied with before inflicting
disciplinary punishment upon and industrial employee. However while the disciplinary proceeding is going on against
an employee, it is a mandatory and not a directory duty upon the employer to give a chance of hearing to such employee.
The Employer / Enquiry Officer is duty bound to ensure that all the requirement of Principle of Natural Justice has been
followed and case should be heard in a judicial spirit and in accordance with Principle of Substantial Justice. Article
14,15,19,21 and 23 of Constitution of India as well as Directive Principle of State Policy provide a better and strong
framework for the protection of interest of the labour class. Employer has to keep in mind that while disciplinary
proceeding is going on against an employee, it should not violate any sacred provisions of the Constitution of India.
13.
By introduction of section 11(A) to the industrial Dispute Act, The Industrial Tribunals are vested with the
power to decide the justification of the decision of the employers. Thus, when it is found that the domestic enquiry is not
held properly, it will stand vitiated and the Industrial Tribunal would set-a-side the order of punishment by giving
appropriate relief including that of lesser punishment or even no punishment resulting in reinstatement 0f the concerned
workman. For disciplinary action, a domestic enquiry occupies an important position under labour law. Thus, the
enquiries are required to be held with utmost regard to the Principle of Natural Justice. Without holding a valid enquiry
or conducting a domestic enquiry in utter violation of Principle of Natural Justice and on the basic of such enquiry the
dismissal of workman for unauthorized absence of near about 5 months is quite socking and disproportionate.
14.
Sri Chanda Majhi the delinquent workman has stated in Para-7 of his written statement that he is out of
employment since the date of dismissal and he being a poor man is facing a complete starvation along with his family
members without having any source of livelihood. The workman has stated on oath in Para-8 of his affidavit that he is
out of employment from date of dismissal and he is without any source of livelihood.
15.
In Deepali Gundu Surwase v/s Kranti Junior Adhyapak Mahavidyalaya (D.Ed.) and others 2013 LAB. I.C.
4249 the Hon’ble Supreme Court has held that;
“ Ordinarily, an employee or workman whose services are terminated and who is desirous of getting back
wages is required to either plead or at least make a statement before the adjudicating authority or the Court of
first instance that he / she was not gainfully employed or was employed on lesser wages. If the employer wants
to avoid payment of full back wages, then it has to plead and also lead cogent evidence to prove that the
employee / workman was gainfully employed and was getting wages equal to the wages he / she was drawing
prior to the termination of service. This is so because it is settled law that the burden of proof of the existence of
a particular fact lies on the person who makes a positive averment about its existence. It is always easier to
prove a positive fact than to prove a negative fact. Therefore, once the employee shows that he was not
employed, the onus lies on the employer to specifically plead and prove that the employee was gainfully
employed and was getting the same or substantially similar emoluments.
Cases in which the tribunal finds that the employer has acted in gross violation of the statutory provision or the
principal of natural justice or is guilty of victimizing the employee or workman, then the concerned Court or
Tribunal will be fully justified in directing payment of full back wages. The courts must keep in view that in
cases of wrongful / illegal termination of service the wrongdoer is the employer and the sufferer is the
employee / workman and there is no justification to give premium to the employer of his wrongdoings by
relieving him of the burden to pay to the employee / workman his dues in the form of full back wages.”
16.
In view of law propounded by Hon’ble Apex Court, the workman is entitled for full back wages from the date
of dismissal till his reinstatement in service. But as per service excerpt his year of birth is 1951. At present his age is
near about 65 years. He has reached rather crossed the age of superannuation therefore he cannot be reinstated. The
workman has not filed any medical certificate regarding his sickness for the period of absence on the file of reference.
Therefore there is no basis to accept that he was absent from duty due to his sickness.
17.
In view of discussion above, the action of management of Lacchipur Colliery under Kajora Area of
M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited in dismissing Sri Chanda Majhi from services w.e.f. 22.11.99 is illegal and unjustified.
I set-a-side the order of dismissal of Sri Chanda Majhi dated 22.11.99. Since he has reached the age of superannuation
M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited is directed to award full back wages from the date of dismissal i.e. 22.11.99 till the date
2366
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
of retirement of Sri Chanda Majhi with all consequential service benefits. The delinquent workman will be imposed the
punishment of stoppage of two annual increment with cumulative effect. The order will be enforced within Two months
after publication under section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
ORDER
Let an “Award” be and the same is passed as per above discussion. Send the copies of the order to the Govt. of
India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for information and needful. The reference is accordingly disposed of.
PRAMOD KUMAR MISHRA, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 25 ebZ] 2016
dk-vk- 1060-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj chch,ech
ds izcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- 1] paMhx<+ ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 90@2012) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 25-05-2016 dks
izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&23012@01@2012&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)]
jktsUæ ¯lg] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 25th May, 2016
S.O. 1060.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 90/2012) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court No. 1, Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Beas
Construction Board (BBMB), Sector-19B and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 25.05.2016.
[No. L-23012/01/2012-IR (CM-II)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRI SURENDRA PRAKASH SINGH, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVT.
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM-LABOUR COURT-I, CHANDIGARH
Case No. ID No 90 of 2012
Reference no. L-23012/1/2012/IR(CM-II) dated 30.01.2013 and corrigendum dated 31.5.2013
Shri Basant Singh son of Shri Ram Saran,
Village Kot, P.O.Chunhan, Tehsil Sadar,
District Mandi(HP)
…Workman.
Versus
1.
The General Manager,
Beas Construction Board (BBMB),
Sector-19B, Chandigarh
2.
Chairman BBMB, Sector 19B,
Chandigarh
3.
Chief Engineer, BSL Project,
Sundernagar, District Mandi.(HP)
…Respondent
Appearances :
For the Workman
:
Shri R.K.Singh.
For the Management
:
Shri Ravinder Singh Rana.
AWARD
Passed on : 06-05-2016
Government of India Ministry of Labour vide notification No. L-23012/1/2012/IR (CM-II) dated 30.01.2013
and corrigendum dated 31.5.2013, the Central Govt. has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938
2367
“Whether the action of the BBMB in denying re-employment to Shri Basant Singh son of Shri Ram Saran, a
retrenchee of BCB is legally just and valid? If not, to what relief Shri Basant Singh is entitled for and from
which date?”
2.
Brief facts of the case according to the workman are that he was appointed by the Beas Construction Board
after trade test as charge man special in work charged capacity and joined as such on 16.4.1964 and he was promoted as
Asstt. Foreman special in 1972 and he was retrenched from service on 20.4.1984. It is pleaded by the workman that
though he had worked for 19 years 5 months and 4 days with the BCB but he was paid retrenchment compensation for
19 years and as per rules he is entitled for the retrenchment compensation for 20 years and in view of the above his
retrenchment is illegal, void and bad in law for non payment of full compensation as mentioned above. It is further
pleaded by the workman that the post of foreman special and assistant foreman special was required by the Chief
engineer BBMB Sundernagar but the workman was not offered re-employment despite senior most workman which is
against the spirit of Award No.2C. It is also pleaded that one Shri Vrinder Chargeman had been given re-employment as
telephone operator. It is also pleaded by the workman that earlier he approached Labour Court Dharamshala and his
reference was dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The workman was given liberty by the Hon’ble High Court in CWP
No. 708/2007 to approach the Central Govt. and delay in raising the dispute shall not be counted. The workman also
pleaded that management of BBMB had filled the post on which the workman was holding by according promotion
from the lower categories which is against the spirit of Section 25H. It is prayed that action of the management in non
providing employment to the workman is against the provisions of the ID Act and prayed for re-employment from back
date with pension, back wages and all benefits.
3.
The management filed reply to the claim statement. Preliminary objection has been taken that the workman is
stopped by his own act and conduct to raise the present dispute in view of the fact that the workman was given liberty to
raise the dispute within four weeks by the order dated 4.6.2010 of the Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh but the
workman has raised the present dispute in 2012 and as such the workman is debarred from raising the dispute at a
belated stage of about two years. It is further pleaded that the workman is in litigation with the management since 1987
and he never raised the issue that the workman was paid less retrenchment compensation in CWP 138/87 and also did
not raise this issue before the Labour Court Dharamshala and even in CWP 708/2007; the workman never raised this
issue. On merits it is pleaded that the workman was retrenched from service by the BCB on 20.4.1984 on the
completion/part completion of the works strictly in accordance with the provisions of the ID Act 1947and the workman
was paid his terminal dues as per law and this retrenchment of the employees of BCB was upheld by the Hon’ble
Supreme Court in the case of Jaswant Singh Vs. Union of India reported in AIR 1980 SC 115. The management further
pleaded that as per directions in reference NO. 2C which was enforceable only for six months, the work charged
employee were taken over in BBMB from BCB bit as the petitioner was not senior in the category of Assistant foreman
special( automobile) and the creation of additional post in that category was denied, therefore, the workman could not be
taken over in the BBMB as at best the workman can claim his right only in his category, trade and seniority and not in
others. Thus it is prayed by the management that as the workman is not entitled for any claim, the reference deserves to
be rejected.
4.
In evidence, the workman filed his affidavit. In rebuttal the management also filed the affidavit of Shri Umesh
Nayak Superintendent( Sr. Executive Engineer) Procurement, Store and Disposal Division BBMB Sunder Nagar
alongwith documents Ex. M2 to M6. Both the witnesses of the parties were cross-examined.
5.
I have heard the parties, gone through the evidence and record.
6.
During arguments it is submitted by the learned representative of the workman that at the time of retrenchment
in the year 1984, the workman was paid less retrenchment compensation as he was paid only for 19 years of service
whereas he was entitled for 20 years of service as he had served19 years five months4 days before retrenchment. As the
retrenchment compensation was paid less, therefore, the retrenchment is bad in law. In this regard, Section 25 F (b) of
the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 is reproduced below:
“(b) The workman has been paid, at the time of retrenchment, compensation which shall be equivalent to fifteen
days’ average pay (for every completed year of continuous service) or any part thereof in excess of six months”
7.
As per claim statement of the workman, he has put in 19 years 5 months 4 days of continuous service and
admittedly the workman was paid retrenchment compensation for 19 years of services which is as per the mandate of the
above provisions of the I.D.Act. During cross examination in this Tribunal, the workman also admitted that he was paid
all his terminal benefits. Thus, workman was adequately paid on account of retrenchment compensation.
8.
Learned representative of the workman submitted during arguments that one Vrinder chargeman was given
reemployment by the BBMB as Telephone Operator and workman was left out and he was not provided re employment
and this action of the management is illegal and arbitrary. Learned representative of the management submitted that as
per directions in reference no.2C of 1971 workcharged employees were taken over in BBMB from the B.C.B. The
2368
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
workman was not taken as there was no vacancy in his cadre and no junior to the workman was given re employment.
From the perusal of the evidence, during cross examination it is admitted by the workman that “it is correct that my
seniority number was found in the category of Assistant Foreman Special. It is correct that no person junior to me was
offered employment by the BBMB. Vrinder Kumar was engaged as Telephone Operator”. Thus, it is revealed that none
of the junior to the workman was appointed in the BBMB in his cadre. The above Vrinder was given re employment by
the BBMB as Telephone Operator who was in the category of chargeman.
9.
From the above, it is clear that the workman was rightly paid the retrenchment compensation at the time of his
retrenchment in the year 1984 and none of the junior to the workman was given re employment by the BBMB. It is also
pertinent to mention here that vide letter dated 10-06-1984, Chief Engineer, BSL Project Sundernagar sent a proposal to
Secretary BBMB Chandigarh for creation of additional posts of foreman special, assistant foreman special in the trade of
automobile but this proposal was rejected by the higher authorities. Thus, no post in the trade of assistant foreman
special in the trade of automobile was available to be offered for re employment to the workman. It is pertinent to
mention that the workman is presently aged about 79 years.
10.
In view of the discussion made above, the action of the management of the BBMB in denying re-employment
to Shri Basant Singh son of Shri Ram Saran, a retrenchee of BCB is legal, just and valid and the workman is not entitled
to any relief.
11. Reference is answered accordingly. Central Govt. be informed. Soft copy as well as hard copy be sent to the
Central Govt. for publication.
Chandigarh
06.05.2016
S. P. SINGH, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 25 ebZ] 2016
dk-vk- 1061-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj ,iQlhvkbZ
ds izcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 89@2007) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 25-05-2016 dks izkIr
gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&22012@175@2007&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)]
jktsUæ ¯lg] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 25th May, 2016
S.O. 1061.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 89/2007) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Food Corporation or
India and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 25.05.2016.
[No. L-22012/175/2007-IR (CM-II)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/89/07
Ashwani Shukla,
Ashish Shukla,
Bindu Shukla &
Anshu Shukla, LRs of
Shri Rajendra Kumar Shukla,
S/o Late Shri S.N.Shukla, Srinivas,
Aamapara, Behind Vivekanand Aashram,
Raipur (CG)
…Workman
Versus
Distt. Manager, FCI,
Distt. Office, Jabalpur.
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938
2369
Sr.Regional Manager,
FCI, Regional Office, Chetak Bldg,.
Bhopal
Zonal Officer, FCI,
Dinsha Wacha Road, Church Gate, Mumbai
District Manager, FCI,
District office, Raipur.
Managing Director, FCI,
Head Office, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg,
New Delhi.
…Management
AWARD
Passed on this 7th day of April 2016
1.
As per letter dated 7-9-07 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is
received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.
L-22012/175/2007-IR(CM-II). The dispute under reference relates to:
“Whether the action of the management of Food Corporation of India in terminating the services of Shri
Rajendra Kumar Shukla w.e.f. 9-12-85 is legal and justified? If not, to what relief is the workmen entitled?”
2.
After receiving reference, notices were issued to the parties. Ist party workman submitted statement of claim at
page 2/1 to 2/6. Case of workman is that on 15-11-66, he was transferred to FCI on post of Asstt. Grade III. He was
promoted to the post of Asstt. Grade II on 15-12-66. In the year 1971, he was promoted as Assistant Grade I. his service
record was unblemished. On 25-2-84, workman was served with chargesheet alleging that workman while working at
Railway Goods shed Raipur has issued stocks directly from Raipur Railway goods shed to Raipur Flour Mills on 10-5-
83 without any authority. The stocks were issued without proper weighment and has recorded under weighment of the
stocks. That workman Shri R.K.Shukla has given under benefit of excess weight to the Raipur Flour Mills with ulterior
motive in violation of Regulation No. 31 & 32 of the FCI Staff Regulations 1971. He was suspended on 19-8-83 and
his headquarter was fixed Jabalpur. MP under 2nd party No.5. On 1-6-84, chargesheet was altered. Charge against Shri
R.R.Nirmalkar Asstt. Grade III, FCI was altered. Chargesheet was corrected by substituting the word Railway Goods
Shed, Bhatapara in place of Railway Goods Shed, Raipur. Workman was removed from service as per order dated 9-12-
85. Workman preferred appeal challenging the order of his removal from service. The appeal was rejected without
applying any mind and without any proper reasons. Workman further submits that DE was conducted in short manner
without giving reasonable opportunity to him. Enquiry was conducted in violation of principles of natural justice. That
he was not supplied documents listed with chargesheet. List of witnesses was also not supplied to him. He suffered
injustice in his defence. Workman reiterates that enquiry conducted against him is illegal. He was not permitted to cross
examine witnesses of management who were examined behind his back.
3. Ist party further submits that findings of Enquiry Officer are perverse and deserves to be quashed. That he has
not committed any misconduct for which chargesheet was issued to him. Order of removal from service dated 9-12-85 is
illegal and deserves to be quashed. Workman has further pleaded about civil suit filed by him on advice of his counsel
was decreed on 20-4-92. Said judgment and decree was set aside by Court holding that Civil Court has no jurisdiction to
decide service matter of FCI. Said judgment was challenged by workman before Chhattisgarh High Court. Hon’ble High
Court upheld findings in the appeal that FCI was industry and claim of workman was under industrial dispute,
workman can approach appropriate forum. Consequently the delay in raising dispute is caused. Workman reiterates that
findings of Enquiry Officer are illegal. Order of removal is illegal. On such grounds, workman prays for his
reinstatement and alternately compensation Rs. 25 Lakhs in lieu of reinstatement.
4. 2nd party filed Written Statement at Page 9/1 to 9/13 opposing claim of workman. 2nd party submits that FCI is
statutory corporation established under FCI Corporation Act 1964. That FCI deals with imports, procurement, storage
and distribution of food grains throughout the country. It is bound to act in accordance with the directions issued by
Central Government. The employees of FCI are covered by FCI Regulations of 1971. Workman was appointed in the
Food and Civil supplies deptt. Of Government of India. He was transferred to FCI on 15-11-66. As Asstt. Grade III and
then on 15-12-66, he was promoted to the post of Asstt. Grade II. In 1971, he was promoted to Asstt. Grade I. during
1983, workman was posted at Bhatapara depot of FCI. In May 1983, he issued 6 truck wheat against RO No. 9139
dated 7-5-83 directly from Railway Goods Shed on 10-5-83 to M/s Raipur Flour Mills without any authority and proper
weighment. The details of quantity of wheat supplied in all those six trucks are shown in para 5 of the Written
Statement. That on routine check, officers of FCI found that no weight check memo was prepared for the said issues. It
was also found that the stocks issued without weighment giving undue benefit to parties by issuing excess wheat. The
2370
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
owner of Truck No. CPT/2823 got said truck weighed at Ashok Dharamkanta Raipur and found 138.30 quintals as
against the quantity issued vide Truck Chit No. 4404 dated 10-5-83 which was excess of about 11.80 quintals for which
the transporter claimed transportation charges on whole quantity of weight. That the concerned party was issued with
C & D category of wheat stocks already available in godowns despite delivery was given from Railway Goods Shed
directly with his ulterior motive. That two trucks No. MPS/9649 and MBR/8531 shown loaded with 100 bags wheat
each vide truck Chit No.44-1 & 4402 dated 10-5-83 were actually loaded with 140 bags to 150 bags as confirmed by
railway goods shed hammals. No weight check memo was prepared by Ist party workman. Less number of bags were
shown to have been loaded with ulterior motive and gave undue benefit to M/S Raipur Flour Mills. That 575 MT
gunnies were sent to railway goods shed for replacement of cut and torn bags and for filling loose palla against which
the workman showed receipt of 352 gunnies and 105 gunnies utilized for filling palla. There was shortage of 118
gunnies. Bags were loaded in cases excess on the aforesaid two trucks. The investigation was handed over to one
Assistant Manager who submitted his report. Workman was suspended on 19-7-83. Chargesheet was served on workman
on 25-2-84, the articles of charges statement of implication of misconduct, list of witnesses, documents were supplied to
workman. The chargesheet was issued for violation of Regulation 31, 32, 50, 58 of FCI Staff Regulation 1971.
Workman had approached Disciplinary Authority for revocation of his suspension. His suspension was evoked as per
order dated 5-5-84. Workman was directed to work at Jabalpur.
5.
Shri K.K.Krishnan was appointed as Enquiry Officer and Shri P.M.Nair, Assistant Manager as Presenting
Officer. Enquiry was conducted against workman after correcting the discripancies in chargesheet instead of mentioning
Railway goods Shed, Bhatapara, it was mentioned as Railway Goods Shed, Raipur. Corrigendum was issued on 12-6-84.
Enquiry was conducted on various dates. Workman was represented by defence Assistant Kailash Sahay. Enquiry
Officer submitted his report on 21-11-85 holding charges against workman are proved. The Disciplinary Authority after
considering report of Enquiry Officer imposed penalty of removal from service of workman on 9-12-1985. The appeal
preferred by workman was rejected on 16-12-86. Written Statement is further devoted about the Civil Suit filed by
workman. By looking to the judgment and the order was setaside by 4th Additional District Judge Raipur in 28-A/93. In
2nd appeal No. 534/93, the judgment setting aside said order was upheld holding that claim of workman amounts to
dispute under ID Act, civil court has no jurisdiction. 2nd party submits that enquiry is properly conducted. Punishment
of removal imposed against workman is illegal. Reference be answered in favour of management.
6.
As per order dated 5-12-2014, enquiry conducted against workman is found proper and legal.
7.
Considering pleadings on record and order on enquiry, the points which arise for my consideration and
determination are as under. My findings are recorded against each of them for the reasons as below:-
(i) Whether the misconduct alleged against
workman is proved from evidence in Enquiry
proceedings?
In Affirmative
(ii) Whether the punishment of dismissal imposed
against workman is proper and legal?
In Affirmative
(ii) If not, what relief the workman is entitled to?”
Workman is not entitled to any relief.
REASONS
8.
Enquiry conducted against workman is found proper and legal vide order dated 5-12-2014. Whether charges
alleged against workman are proved needs to be proved considering evidence in Enquiry Proceedings. Learned counsel
for workman Shri R.K.Soni during course of argument submits that chargesheet was issued to workman alleging
misconduct that goods were issued without checking on basis of complaint, the truck was seen overloaded stock was not
checked. Punchnama was not done. Learned counsel further submits that transportation bill was not produced. Charge
was handed over to workman. Therefore issuing weight cannot be said unauthorized. The weighment receipt was not
produced only on complaint. Any documents were not verified w.r.t. overloading. Gage pass was not produced. Learned
counsel also referred to judgment by Civil Court, appeal and 2nd appeal. The incident was not reported to police., charge
against Shri Nirmalkar was dropped. The witness were not examined. Claim of workman was decreed by Civil Court
holding charges against workman as not proved. All the witnesses in enquiry had admitted their signature on the
complaint.
9.
Workman died during pendency of reference. LRs are brought on record. Monetary benefits be allowed to LRs.
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938
2371
10.
Shri S.Pandey for management submitted written notes of argument. Learned counsel further explained the
workman was suspended. List of witnesses, list of documents were enclosed along with memo of articles of charges.
Suspension was revoked on 5-5-84. Management’s witnesses were cross-examined. Enquiry Proceeding was submitted.
The appeal preferred by workman was rejected. The litigation by workman in Civil Court Ist appeal and 2nd appeal is not
relevant for deciding the controversy between parties as civil court has no jurisdiction decide under Section 10 of ID
Act and Hon’ble High Court has upheld the judgment of 4th Additional District Judge setting aside the judgment and
decree passed by Civil Judge.
11.
Whether charges alleged against workman are proved needs to be decided considering evidence in Enquiry
Proceedings itself. Exhibit M-8 is memo of charges issued to workman on 25-2-84. The charges alleged against
workman pertains to while workman was working at Railway Goods Shed on 10-5-83 without authority issued stocks
without proper weighment and recorded under weighment of stock. Workman had given undue benefit of excess weight
with ulterior motive violating Article 31,32 of FCI Regulation Act, 1971. Preliminary Enquiry Report is produced at
Page 9/30. Statement of witness Shri D.B.Markam is on the point that he had admitted his signature on complaint
collectively made by Class IV employees. In his cross-examination, witness says that in May 83, Jagdev Singh was
Assistant Manager. Shri R.K.Shukla was Technical Asstt. Of Bhatapara in May 83. No gunnies were sent from State
godown to Shri R.K.Shukla and RR Nirmalkar on 10-5-83. In reply to Q.6, witness says it was duty of workman in case
of suspect excess loading in a particular truck is noticed as compared to the Truck Chit, so we brought to the knowledge
of the superior and police. Evidence of witness Shri Dhru Stitcher at Page 9/37 is only w.r.t. that he signed the
complaint, he has no personal knowledge. Management’s witness Shri K.L.Patel in his evidence says that Exhibit P-6
shown to him is letter addressed to Asstt. Manager, FCI, Bhatapara dated 25-6-83 is signed by him. The letter relates to
misappropriation of wheat at Railway Goods Shed Bhatapara. On 10-5-83, he was on duty at Railway Goods Shed from
6 AM to 4 PM. He performed double duty at Bhatapara. He reached godown at 4.30 PM he was not aware about loading
of truck with wheat for Raipur Flour Mills by Shri Ratan Babu. He found gate pass with Ratan. He had some doubt
about excess quantity loaded in truck and mentioned in the letter to take appropriate action by higher authorities. He
confirmed said letter Exhibit P-5. In his further evidence, above management’s witnesses says out of wheat stocks being
dispatched from Railhead to CWCV godown Bhatapara, Shri Suklaji has sent 5 trucks of wheat to four mills directly. It
created some doubts to all workmen in these trucks excess quantity of wheat was dispatched. Ratan has dispatched
those trucks to Raipur Flour mills. Management’s witness Shri R.K.Shukla admitted his signatures on Exhibit P-4
addressed to AG-I, FCI, Bhatapara. He identified signature of Shri R.K.Shukla dated 13-5-83. His evidence is further
devoted on the point that P-2 shown to him is release order No. 9139 dated 7-5-83 addressed to M/S Raipur Flour Mill,
Raipur detailing C & D wheat of 690 quintals to be released to them by Asstt. Manager, FCI, Bhatapara. It is signed by
Shri Gurucharan Singh dated 7-5-83. As seen from release order, delivery of stock is to be completed before 10-5-83.
In his cross-examination, witness says priority list was prepared as per condition of stock categorization. In reply to Q.4,
witness says it was supplied before issuing stock to D/I Bhatapara. In reply to Q.5, witness says Narayan was D/I,
Bhatapara. That as incharge of FCI hired godown on 10-5-83 Sjhri R.K.Shukla was working and Shri NMarayan had
handed over the charge to Shri R.K.Shukla of hired godown. Ex.P-4 doesnot indicate that Shri R.K.Shukla refused to
take note of stocks from his godown. In reply to Q.9, witness says party approached with RO to Shri Narayan and he
was unaware whether Shri R.K.Shukla has refused to issue C&D category stock 44 MTs lying in State hired godown.
On 10-5-83, he was working in Bhatapara office. In reply to Q.13, witness did not remember circumstances in which
Exhibit P-4 was written.
12.
Management’s witness Shri Verma at Page 9/47 says before signing complaint P-4 regarding misappropriation
at Bhatapara office. He identified his signature on complaint Sl.No.11. He readover the complaint and signedover it. He
was not on dugty at Railway Good Shed on 12-5-83. Shri R.K.Shukla was in the office during the period but he had not
taken over charge during that period. Management’s witness Shri B.P.Mishra has given detailed evidence that
stockloaded by Trick No. 2823 transported from Bhatapara goods Shed to Raipur Flour Mill Raipur was on average
weight and not weighed. The driver of the truck told that weight seems to be more and accordingly remedy was taken
by Shri Ashokdharan Kanta. As per this weighment, 12 to 14 quintals weight was seen in excess and he got the
transportation charges as per the actual weight. That Shri Swran Sahu was driver of the truck No. CPT 2823. That
Bhatiya transport engaged the truck contractor of FCI on 10-5-83. In reply to Q.4, above witness of management
reite3rates that weight was shown on average, it is not written in the document, truck was dispatched without
weighment. In reply to Q.5, above witness says that on basis of writing complaint about excess weight and excess
payment as per statement of other Truck Driver, he had not seen him receiving excess payment in his presence. In reply
to Q.6, he says that as insisted by legal representative of workman, he had given in writing. He handed over cheque to
some official of Bhatapara depot.Evidence of witness D.W.Narayan shows that he confirmed entries reflected in log
book P-9. He did not find place at Page 16 of Exhibit B-I. as per entry P-9 the gunnies were sent to Railway godown
shed for utilization but name of recipient is not recorded. In reply to Q.3, witness says 100 % weighment was not
conducted at Railway Goods Shed Bhatapara on 10-5-83. When this witness was referred to Page 60 of Exhibit D-2, he
confirmed as per remarks made therein how many empty gunnies were received back from Railway Goods Shed out of
2372
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
575 gunnies sent to the Railway Goods Shed from State Godown. Out of 575 gunnies, 48 gunnies were received back,
105 were utilized for palla filling, 304 gunnies unser were received after replacement and 118 were not received back
neither served nor as unserved. His evidence in further cross examination shows that Shri R.K.Shukla told for C&D
category wheat was requested by the Asstt. Manager Bhatapara only to liquidate the old stock of C&D category lying in
the depot. Shri shukla said that he will reply for that. In reply to Q.5, witness says he did not know who was incharge
but he had seen the routine papers were signed sometimes by Shri R.K.Shukla AG I(D) and sometimes by Shri
R.K.Shukla TA Gr.I, some were signed by him also. He had not seen any official order.
13.
Evidence of witnesses is discussed by Enquiry Officer in his report. The scope of judicial review is limited. The
evidence of witnesses in Enquiry Proceedings cannot be re-appreciated. The evidence considered by Enquiry Officer in
his report is supported. It cannot be said that Enquiry Report submitted by Enquiry Officer in the enquiry and it cannot
be said that the finding of Enquiry Officer are perverse. For above reasons, I record my finding in Point No.1 in
Affirmative.
14.
Point No.2- In view of my finding in Point No.1 charges alleged against workman are proved from evidence in
Enquiry Proceedings, question remains for decision whether punishment of removal imposed against workman is proper
and justified. The charges proved against workman from evidence in Enquiry Proceedings pertains to issuing wheat
without weighing, excessive stocks were loaded in the trucks, about 11-14 quintals excess in all those six trucks. The
proved charges against workman are very serious. Therefore punishment of removal from service of workman cannot be
said excessive or disproportionate. So far as written notes of argument submitted on behalf of workman is mostly
devoted about enquiry against workman was not properly conducted. Issue is already answered in Affirmative holding
that enquiry is legal. Notes of arguments submitted doesnot deal with evidence of management’s witnesses. Similar
notes of argument submitted by counsel for 2nd party. The details of evidence how the charges are proved from evidence
in Enquiry Proceedings are not mentioned. Considering charge proved against workman is of serious nature, no
interference in punishment of removal of workman is called for. For above reasons, I record my finding in Point No.2 in
Affirmative.
15.
In the result, award is passed as under:-
(1)
The action of the management is proper and legal.
(2)
Workman is not entitled to any relief.
R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 25 ebZ] 2016
dk-vk- 1062-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj lkmFkuZ ,;j
dekaM ds izcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] ,ukZdqye ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 45@2013) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 25-05-2016 dks
izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&42025@03@2016&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)]
ih- ds- os.kqxksiky] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 25th May, 2016
S.O. 1062.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (ID No. 45/2013) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Ernakulam now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the
management of the Southern Air Command and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on
25.05.2016.
[No. L-42025/03/2016-IR (DU)]
P. K. VENUGOPAL, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
ERNAKULAM
Present: Shri. K. Sasidharan, B.Sc., LLB, Presiding Officer
(Friday the 29th day of April, 2016/09th Vaisakha, 1938)
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938
2373
ID 45/2013
Workman
:
Smt. S. Nirmala Devi,
Kamala Vilasam,
T.C. 34/329, Beach P. O.,
Thiruvananthapuram.
By Adv. Shri Biju Balakrishnan
Managements
:
1. The Commanding Officer,
Wing Commander Head Quarters,
Southern Air Command,
Air Force Station,
Thiruvananthapuram.
2. The Chief Administrative Officer (Wing Commander),
Air Force Station, Beach P.O.,
Thiruvananthapuram.
By Adv. Shri Jamaludheen. K. M.
This case coming up for final hearing on 22.04.2016 and this Tribunal-cum-Labour Court on 29.04.2016 passed
the following:
AWARD
This is an application filed by the workman under Section 2A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
2.
The contentions of the workman as drawn out from the application, in brief are as follows:
As per the appointment order No.17FBSU/358/2/Org., dated 04.08.1992 the workman was employed as Ayah
under the management from the year 1992. She was treated as a conservancy worker in the medical inspection room of
the management. She is a workman as defined under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. There was an
attempt on the part of the management to terminate her services. Therefore the workman along with three other
similarly situated persons filed O.A. No.306/1998 before the Hon’ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Ernakulam. That
OA was disposed of as per order dated 18.11.1999 directing the management not to terminate her services if work is
available and if persons with lesser length of service are retained. Subsequently there was an attempt on the part of the
management to disengage the workman from her duties. Therefore she filed OA No.293/2002 before the Hon’ble
Central Administrative Tribunal. The Hon’ble Central Administrative Tribunal declined to accept the request of the
workman against which she preferred WP(C) No.26075/2005 before the Hon’ble High Court of Kerala. As per the
judgment dated 24.06.2008 the Hon’ble High Court of Kerala directed the management to continue the engagement of
the workman with further observation that it will not be reasonable for the management to decline her employment on
daily wage basis. Subsequently the management allowed the workman to continue as a casual labourer.
3.
The workman was compelled to accept the engagement as a casual labourer under the management due to her
pathetic situation. Subsequently the management appointed another person overlooking the claim of the workman and
ignoring the directions of Hon’ble High Court of Kerala. As per Rule 15 of the Special Rules for Pat Time Contingent
Service, the workman is entitled to continue in service till she attains the age of seventy years. Even though the
workman submitted representation before the first management and before the Hon’ble Minister of Defence,
Government of India no positive steps were taken to provide employment to the workman. Therefore she approached
Conciliation Officer & Assistant Labour Commissioner(Central), Trivandrum with a request to resolve the dispute
through negotiation. The Conciliation Officer could not resolve the dispute. Hence he issued a certificate enabling
the workman to pursue her remedy before this Tribunal. Therefore the workman has requested to set aside the actions
taken by the management and to direct them to reengage her with all benefits including back wages.
4.
The contentions in the written statement filed by the management in brief are as follows:
The management has denied all the averments in the application except those that are specifically admitted.
This tribunal has no jurisdiction to consider the claim put forward by the workman in view of the policy decision of the
Union of India. Before approaching this Tribunal the workman filed application before the Hon’ble Central
Administrative Tribunal on two occasions and Writ Petition before the Hon’ble High Court of Kerala. The management
has called upon the workman to prove that she will come under the purview of “workman” as defined under Section 2(s)
of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Even as per the admission of the workman she was engaged as a part time daily
wage employee in the medical inspection room attached to the office of the Commanding Officer, Thiruvananthapuram.
The wages due to her is paid from and out of the Regimental funds, which is contributed by Air Warriors of the base
2374
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
station for their welfare activities. The services of the workman cannot be undertaken through Government Funds as it
is not authorized.
5.
As per the judgment in WP(C) No.26075/2005 dated 24.06.2008 the Hon’ble High Court of Kerala has
observed that the workman has no ground to claim for regularization in service. It was further observed that the service
of the workman was on daily wage basis and further directed that as and when vacancy arises on temporary basis, to
employ her.
6.
In pursuance of the observations in the judgment of the Hon’ble High Court of Kerala the management offered
the job of casual labourer on daily wage basis to the workman in the year 2008. The workman did not accept the same.
Again as per letter dated 18.06.2009 she was offered employment, which she accepted and continued the work as a daily
wage casual labourer in broken periods till March, 2011.
7.
From April, 2011 the base station of the management is not authorized to hire casual labourers directly. The
Government of India advised the management to outsource the conservancy/casual labour services by Integrated
Financial Advisor to Government of India due to change in the administration policy by the Union of India. As per the
decision of the Government of India such work should be given to ex-servicemen. The claim of the workman is not
maintainable either in law or on facts. The management has requested to uphold her contentions and disallow the claim
of the workman.
8.
The workman filed replication reiterating the contentions in the claim application filed by her.
9.
As per order in IA No.137/2014 dated 31.12.2014, additional written statement filed by the management
is received. In the additional written statement the management has contended that this Tribunal has no
jurisdiction to consider the claim of the workman. They have pleaded non-joinder of the necessary parties in this matter.
They have called upon the workman to prove that she will come under the purview of the Section 2(s) of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 and that she has got the locus standi to maintain an application of this nature. They have requested
to uphold her contentions.
10.
The workman tendered evidence as WW1 and Exts.W1 to W4 are the documents marked on her behalf. On
behalf of the management MW1 was examined. Heard both sides.
11.
The points arising for consideration are:
“(i) Whether the applicant herein will come under the purview of “workman” as defined under
Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947?
(ii)
Whether the workman is entitled to get an order of reinstatement as Ayah under the
management with continuity of service as claimed by her?
(iii) Reliefs and costs?”
12.
Point Nos.(i) & (ii):-
This is an application filed by the individual workman under Section 2A(2) of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Her case is that as per appointment order No.17FBSU/358/2/Org. dated 04.08.1992 she
was appointed as Ayah under the management. She would further state that she was treated as a conservancy worker in
the medical inspection room of the management. According to the workman she comes under the purview of Section
2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act. She has alleged termination of her employment by the management without any
reason and denial of her right to continue in employment. According to her the management will come under the
purview of Section 2(g) of the Industrial Disputes Act. Earlier she had approached the Hon’ble Central Administrative
Tribunal on two occasions by filing OA Nos.306/1998 and 293/2002. She had also approached the Hon’ble High Court
of Kerala by filing WP(C) No.26075/2005. According to the workman she is entitled to continue her employment under
the management as Ayah and that her denial of employment by the management is illegal.
13.
The management has specifically denied the claim of the workman under the purview of the Industrial Disputes
Act. They have stated that she will not come under the purview of “workman” as defined under Section 2(s) of the
Industrial Disputes Act. They have stated that the applicant was employed as a part time daily wages employee in the
medical inspection room attached to the Commanding Officer, Thiruvananthapuram and the wages due to her is paid
from and out of the Regimental Funds, contributed by Air Warriors of the base station for their welfare activities. On
going through the contentions of the workman and that of the management it is clear that the workman herein was
employed purely on temporary basis.
14.
Ext.W1 is copy of the appointment order dated 04.08.1992 issued to the workman by the Chief Administrative
Officer. The Ext.W1 order reveals that the workman was appointed as part time Ayah to work in the unit of the medical
inspection room on temporary basis. Ext.W2 is copy of the order in OA No.306/1998 passed by the Hon’ble Central
Administrative Tribunal, Ernakulam Bench. The Ext.W2 order also will not confer any absolute right of employment to
the workman under the management. Ext.W3 is copy of the order in OA No.293/2002 passed by the Hon’ble Central
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938
2375
Administrative Tribunal, Ernakulam Bench . Ext.W3 order also will not entitle the applicant/workman herein to
continue her services under the management. Ext.W4 is copy of the judgment in WP(C) No.26075/2005(S) passed by
the Hon’ble High Court of Kerala. In Ext.W4 judgment the Hon’ble High Court of Kerala has made it clear that the
appointment of the workman is not to any post but it is only on adhoc basis using the fund available with the first
respondent. The Hon’ble High Court of Kerala has observed that as and when there is a vacancy on temporary basis the
request of the workman may also be considered. The said observation by the Hon’ble High Court of Kerala will not
confer any legal right to the applicant for continuity of service or reinstatement in service under the management.
15.
While examined as WW1 the applicant has stated that she has not preferred any appeal against Ext.W4
judgment passed by the Hon’ble High Court of Kerala. Even as per the contentions of the applicant it is evident that she
was working purely on temporary basis under the management. While examined as MW1 the witness examined on
behalf of the management has stated that the applicant was employed on adhoc basis and she was paid from and out of
the non-public fund contributed by the personnel of the Air Force Station. He has stated that when there was a vacancy
in the non-public fund they gave an application to the applicant but she failed to submit any application for that vacancy.
16.
On going through the evidence tendered by WW1 and MW1 and the documents marked in this case it is clear
that the applicant will not come under the purview of Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. It follows that
the applicant is not entitled to any relief claimed in this application. Hence the points for consideration are answered
against the applicant.
17.
Point No.(iii):-
In view of the finding on Point Nos.(i) and (ii) the applicant is not entitled to the reliefs
claimed in this application. The point is answered accordingly.
18.
In the result an award is passed holding that the applicant/workman is not entitled to any of relief claimed as per
this Industrial Dispute.
The Award will come into force one month after its publication in the Official Gazette.
Dictated to the Personal Assistant, transcribed and typed by her, corrected and passed by me on this the 29th day
of April, 2016.
K. SASIDHARAN, Presiding Officer
APPENDIX
Witness for the workman
WW1
08.01.2016
Smt. Nirmaladevi. S.
Witness for the managements
MW1
28.03.2016
Shri Ajit G. Sonna
Exhibits for the workman
W1
-
True copy of the appointment order No.17FBSU/358/2/Org. dated 04.08.1992 issued to
the workman by the Chief Administrative Officer, Air Force Station, Trivandrum.
W2
-
True coy of the Order in OA No.306/1998 dated 18.11.1999 passed by the Hon’ble Central
Administrative Tribunal, Ernakulam Bench
W3
-
True copy of the Order in OA No.293/2002 dated 11.02.2005 passed by the Hon’ble Central
Administrative Tribunal, Ernakulam Bench
W4
-
True copy of the judgment in WP(C) No.26075/2005(S) dated 24.06.2008 passed by the Hon’ble High
Court of Kerala, Ernakulam.
Exhibits for the managements
-
NIL
ubZ fnYyh] 25 ebZ] 2016
dk-vk- 1063-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj ,p,y,y
ykbiQds;j fyfeVsM ds izcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] ,ukZdqye ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 10@2015) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks
25-05-2016 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&42011@160@2014&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)]
ih- ds- os.kqxksiky] MsLd vf/dkjh
2376
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
New Delhi, the 25th May, 2016
S.O. 1063.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (ID No. 10/2015) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Ernakulam now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the
management of the HLL Lifecare Limited and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on
25.05.2016.
[No. L-42011/160/2014-IR (DU)]
P. K. VENUGOPAL, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
ERNAKULAM
Present: Shri.K. Sasidharan, B.Sc., LLB, Presiding Officer
(Wednesday the 27th day of April, 2016/07th Vaisakha, 1938)
ID 10/2015
Unions
:
1.
The General Secretary,
Hindustan Latex Workmen’s Congress (INTUC),
C/o HLL Lifecare Ltd.,
Peroorkada Factory,
Trivandrum – 695005.
2.
The General Secretary,
Hindustan Latex Labour Union (AITUC),
Peroorkada,
Trivandrum – 695005.
By Adv. Shri. M. S. Vijayachandra Babu
3.
The General Secretary,
Hindustan Latex Employees Union (CITU),
Peroorkada,
Trivandrum – 695005.
(ex-parte)
Management
:
The Chairman & Managing Director,
M/s.HLL Lifecare Limited,
Head Office, Poojappura,
Trivandrum – 695012.
By Adv. Shri. Ajith. S Nair
This case coming up for final hearing on 27.04.2016 and this Tribunal-cum-Labour Court on the same day passed the
following:
AWARD
In exercise of the power conferred by clause (d) of sub-section(1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Act 14 of 1947) the Central Government referred the following dispute before this
Tribunal for adjudication.
2.
The dispute is:
‘Whether the action of the management of M/s. HLL Lifecare Ltd. in denying the payment of arrears on the
overtime work during the period on 01.01.2007 to 31.12.2009 resultant to the memorandum of settlement dated
16th January 2010 is fair and justifiable? If not, what relief they are entitled to?’
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938
2377
3.
After receipt of the reference order No.L-42011/160/2014-IR(DU) dated 05.02.2015, issued by the Ministry of
Labour, Government of India, summons was issued to parties to appear and answer all material points relating to the
dispute and to produce the documents to substantiate their respective contentions. On receipt of the summons, union
Nos.1 & 2 and the management entered appearance through counsel. Summons was served on union No.3. Union No.3
was called absent and set ex-parte. Union Nos.1 & 2 filed claim statement and the matter was posted for written
statement of the management. While so union No.1 filed IA No.68/2016 and union No.2 filed IA No.69/2016 with a
request to pass an award holding that there is no subsisting industrial dispute to be adjudicated between the union and
the management. Paragraph Nos.3 & 4 of the affidavit filed in support of the IA Nos.68/2016 and 69/2016 read as
follows:-
“3.
The matter in dispute has been resolved by paying the arrears on overtime work during the period from
1.01.2007 to 31.12.2009 resultant to the memorandum of settlement dated 16.01.2010. As such there is no
dispute at present between the management and this union.
4.
As there is no dispute exists at present between the parties an award may be passed on the ground that
there is no dispute exists. The accompanying petition to pass an award may kindly be allowed.”
4.
Notice of this application was given to the learned counsel for the management. Heard both sides.
5.
From the affidavit filed in support of IA Nos.68/2016 and 69/2016 it is seen that the dispute between the unions
on the one hand and the management on the other have been settled amicably and at present there is no subsisting
industrial dispute to be adjudicated as per the reference.
6.
In the result an award is passed holding that there is no subsisting Industrial Dispute to be adjudicated between
the parties.
The award will come into force one month after its publication in the Official Gazette.
Dictated to the Personal Assistant, transcribed and typed by her, corrected and passed by me on this the 27th day
of April, 2016.
SASIDHARAN K., Presiding Officer
APPENDIX
-
NIL
ubZ fnYyh] 25 ebZ] 2016
dk-vk- 1064-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vksfj,.Vy
flD;ksfjVh l£ol ,aM vnlZ ds izcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh;
ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] Hkqousoj ds iapkV (lanHkZ dsl la- 57@2014) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj
dks 25-05-2016 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&42011@95@2014&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)]
ih- ds- os.kqxksiky] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 25th May, 2016
S.O. 1064.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (ID Case No. 57/2014) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Bhubaneswar now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation
to the management of the Oriental Security Service and Others and their workman, which was received by the Central
Government on 25.05.2016.
[No. L-42011/95/2014-IR (DU)]
P. K. VENUGOPAL, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, BHUBANESWAR
Present:
Shri B.C. Rath,
Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-cum-Labour
Court, Bhubaneswar.
2378
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 28, 2016/ JYAISTHA 7, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 57/2014
L-42011/95/2014-IR (DU), dated 11.11.2014
Date of Passing Order – 26th April, 2016
Between:
1. The Managing Director,
M/s. Oriental Security Service,
Plot No. 85, Po. Sahidnagar,
Bhubaneswar (Odisha) – 751 007
2. The Principal, Regional
Institute of Education Worker’s Union,
At CITU Odisha State Office,
VR-5/1, Unit-3, Kharvelnagar,
Bhubaneswar, Odisha – 751 001.
…
1st Party-Managements.
(And)
The President,
Regional Institute of Education
Worker’s Union, At. CITU
Odisha State Office,
VR-5/1, Unit-3, Kharvelnagar,
Bhubaneswar, Odisha – 751 001
…
2nd Party-Union.
Appearances:
None
…
For the 1st Party-Managements.
None
…
For the 2nd Party-Union.
ORDER
Case taken up. Parties are absent. The 2nd Party-Union has not filed any statement of claim despite sending
notices through registered post. In order to give a last opportunity to the 2nd party-Union notice was issued to it on
04.03.2016 fixing 26.4.2016 for appearance and for filing of statement of claim, but neither the 2nd party-Union caused
appearance today nor has filed any statement of claim. As such it seems that the 2nd party-Union is not interested in
prosecuting its case. However the dispute cannot be adjudicated upon for want of pleadings on behalf of the parties. As
such there is no alternative except to return the reference to the Government for necessary action at its end.
2.
Accordingly the reference is returned to the Government unanswered for necessary action at its end.
Dictated & Corrected by me.
B.C. RATH, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 25 ebZ] 2016
dk-vk- 1065-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj tokgj uoksn;
fo|ky; ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV ¹vkbZ-Mh- lanHkZ la- (lhthvkbZVh,) 1152@2004º dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh;
ljdkj dks 25-05-2016 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&42012@23@99&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)]
ih- ds- os.kqxksiky] MsLd vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 25th May, 2016
S.O. 1065.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award [I.D. Ref. No. (CGITA) 1152/2004] of the Central Government Industrial
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 28] 2016@T;s"B 7] 1938
2379
Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management
of the Jawahar Novodaya Vidyalaya and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 25.05.2016.
[No. L-42012/23/99-IR (DU)]
P. K. VENUGOPAL, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present:
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,
Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,
Ahmedabad,
Dated 25th April, 2016
Reference: (CGITA) No. 1152/2004
The Principal,
Jawahar Navodaya Vidhyalaya,
At & PO – Dhrangadhra,
Distt. – Surendranagar
Gujarat – 363310
…First Party
v/s
Shri Dave Kiritkumar Prahladbhai,
Near Rama Pir Mandir, Rajsitapar,
Tal. – Dhrangadhra,
Distt. – Surendranagar
Gujarat – 363310
…Second Party
For the First Party
:
Shri P.M. Rami
For the Second Party
:
None
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour ,New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-42012/23/99-
IR(DU) dated 14.09.1999 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad(Gujarat) in respect
of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
“Whether Shri Dave Kiritkumar Prajladbhai who has been entrusted with the job of catering meals and
refreshments by the management of Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya, Dhrangadhra, can been deemed as a
workman in terms of Section 2 (S) of the I.D. Act? If so, whether the awarding of catering contract to another
person by the management on the plea that Shri Dave Kiritkumar Prahladbhai did not sign the necessary
contract is legal and justified? If not, to what relief he is entitled?”
1.
The reference dates back to 14.09.1999. Second party submitted the statement of claim Ext. 5 on 10.12.1999.
First party submitted the written statement Ext. 12 on 06.07.2000. Since then second party has not led his evidence.
First party’s advocate Shri P.M. Rami has moved and application Ext. 32 for closing purses today. As the second party
has not been prosecuting the case since the filing the statement of claim Ext. 5 on 10.12.1999. Thus this tribunal has no
option but to dismiss the reference in default of the second party.
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
Uploaded by Dte. of Printing at Government of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi-110064
and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi-110054.