3905 GI/2016

(3829)

jftLVªh la- Mh- ,y- (,u) 04@0007@2003µ05

REGD. NO. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05

izkf/dkj ls izdkf'kr

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

lkIrkfgd

WEEKLY

la- 34]

ubZ fnYyh] vxLr 14—vxLr 20] 2016] '[email protected] 23—Jko.k 29] 1938

No. 34]

NEW DELHI, AUGUST 14—AUGUST 20, 2016, SATURDAY/SRAVANA 23— SRAVANA 29, 1938

bl Hkkx esa fHkUu i`"B la[;k nh tkrh gS ftlls fd ;g i`Fkd ladyu ds :i esa j[kk tk lds

Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

Hkkx II—[k.M 3—mi&[k.M (ii)

PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)

Hkkjr ljdkj ds ea=kky;ksa (j{kk ea=kky; dks NksM+dj) }kjk tkjh fd, x, lkafof/d vkns'k vkSj vf/lwpuk,a

Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India

(Other than the Ministry of Defence)

dkfeZd] yksd f'kdk;r rFkk isa'ku ea=kky;

(dkfeZd vkSj izf'k{k.k foHkkx)

ubZ fnYyh] 9 vxLr] 2016

dk-vk- 1707-—dsUnz ljdkj] fnukad @ @2014 dh x`g (iqfyl) foHkkx dh vf/lwpuk la- 1@lhchvkbZ&80&30@2014&,pih

vkSj fnukad 15-12-2014 ds Kkiu la- 1@lhchvkbZ&80&04@2014 ,pih 10327@iVuk }kjk fcgkj jkT; ljdkj dh lgefr ls fnYyh

fo'ks"k iqfyl LFkkiu vf/fu;e] 1946 (1946 dk vf/fu;e la- 25) dh /kjk 6 ds lkFk ifBr /kjk 5 dh mi&/kjk (1) }kjk iznÙk

'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, fofHkUu Hkkjrh; ukxfjdksa vkSj ckgj jgus okys ,uvkjvkbZ ds fojQ¼ vkbZihlh dh /kjk 120 ch ds lkFk

ifBr /kjk 420] 467] 468] 471 vkSj lwpuk izkS|ksfxdh vf/fu;e] 2000 dh /kjk 66 Mh ds v/hu "kM~;a=k] /ks[kk/M+h] tkylkth ds

ekeys] ftlesa /ks[kk/M+h dh jkf'k fcgkj ds fofHkUu LFkkuksa ij euh xzke vkSj osLVuZ ;wfu;u ds ekè;e ls izkIr dh tk jgh] esa ekeyk

ntZ djus vkSj bldk vUos"k.k djus ds fy, fnYyh fo'ks"k iqfyl LFkkiu ds lnL;ksa dh 'kfDr;ksa vkSj U;k;kf/dkj {ks=k dk foLrkj

,rn~}kjk laiw.kZ fcgkj jkT; ij djrh gSA

[iQk- la- 228@80@2014&,ohMh&II]

,y- ih- 'kekZ] voj lfpo

MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS

(Department of Personnel and Training)

New Delhi, the 9th August, 2016

S.O. 1707.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 5 read with section 6 of the

Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (Act No. 25 of 1946), the Central Government with the consent of the

3830

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 20, 2016/ SRAVANA 29, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

state Government of Bihar vide Home (Police) Deptt. Notification No. 1/CBI-80-03/2014 H.P. dated / /2014 and

Memo No. 1/CBI-80-03/2014 H.P. 10327/Patna dated 15.12.2014, hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the

members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment in the whole of the State of Bihar for registering and investigating a

case of conspiracy, cheating and forgery U/s 120-B IPC R/w 420 IPC, 467 IPC, 468 IPC, 471 IPC and Sec. 66D of

Information and Technology Act, 2000 committed against various Indian citizens and NRIs staying abroad, in which

cheated amounts are being received through Money Gram and Western Union at various places of Bihar.

[F. No. 228/80/2014-AVD-II]

L. P. SHARMA, Under Secy.

miHkksDrk ekeys] [kk| vkSj lkoZtfud forj.k ea=kky;

(miHkksDrk ekeys foHkkx)

(Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks)

ubZ fnYyh] 21 tqykbZ] 2016

dk-vk- 1708-—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks (izek.ku) fofu;e 1988 ds fu;e 4 ds mifu;e (5) ds

vuqlj.k esa Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks ,rn~}kjk vf/klwfpr djrk gS fd ftu ykblsalksa ds fooj.k uhps vuqlwph

esa fn, x, gS] os Lohd`r dj fn, x, gSa % -

vuqlwph

lwph

Øe

lalalala-

Ykkblsal

la[;k

Lohd`r djus dh

frfFk o

frfFk o"kZ"kZ"kZ"kZ @ekg

ekg

Ykkbls

Ykkblsal/kkjh dk uke o Ikr

l/kkjh dk uke o Ikr

l/kkjh dk uke o Ikrk

Hkkjrh; ekud dk

'kh

'kh'kh

'kh"kZ"kZ"kZ"kZd

Hkk ek

la[;k

Hkkx

vuq

o"kZ"kZ"kZ"kZ

7209524

01@01@2016

गायी टील कापरेशन,

395, जी आई डी सी ए टेट

मकरपुरा, वडोदरा-390010

ईरीगेशन

इ यूपमट

मीिडया फ टर

14606

1998

2 7200032487

01@01@2016

िमलाप वैलस

102, 103, सी बी देसाई

चै" बस , गुंजन िसनेमा के पास,

कोपारली रोड, जी आई डी सी

वलसाद -396195

वण तथा वण धातु)

के आभूषण- िश पकारी

शु.ता एवं मुहरांकन

1417

1999

3 7200032891

01@01@2016

जेवरात वैलस

खोिडयार माताजी मंदर के

पास,

नवा बाजार,

बावला, अहमदाबाद

वण तथा वण धातु)

के आभूषण- िश पकारी

शु.ता एवं मुहरांकन

1417

1999

4 7200032992

01@01@2016

बी एन बी िबटुमन 6ा.

िलिमटेड 7 लाट नंबर- 283,

नंदेसरी जी आई डी सी ए टेट

अंगध, वडोदरा-391340

िबटूमन इमलशन फार

रोड (कै8टआिनक

टाईप)

8887

2004

5 7200033287

01@01@2016

चोकसी हीरालाल मगनलाल

वैलस 6ा. िलिमटेड,

जी एफ/ए/1 राधे शॉ:पग

माल, खोखरा सक ल के सामने,

मणीनगर,

अहमदाबाद-380008

वण तथा वण धातु)

के आभूषण- िश पकारी

शु.ता एवं मुहरांकन

1417

1999

6 7200032790

04@01@2016

खुशबु 7 लाईवुड 6ा. िलिमटेड,

143-ए, धानोत ग;व, छतराल

कडी रोड,

ता कलोल, धानोत, गांधीनगर-

382729

मे8रन 7 लाईवुड

710

2010

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 20] [email protected] 29] 1938

3831

Øe

lalalala-

Ykkblsal

la[;k

Lohd`r djus dh

frfFk o

frfFk o"kZ"kZ"kZ"kZ @ekg

ekg

Ykkbls

Ykkblsal/kkjh dk uke o Ikr

l/kkjh dk uke o Ikr

l/kkjh dk uke o Ikrk

Hkkjrh; ekud dk

'kh

'kh'kh

'kh"kZ"kZ"kZ"kZd

Hkk ek

la[;k

Hkkx

vuq

o"kZ"kZ"kZ"kZ

7 7200033085

08@01@2016

पु< ती पाईप इंड =ीज

एट तथा पो ट: ढोलकया,

बोडेली, ओरसंग नदी के

पास, बोडेली,

छोटा

उदयपुर- 391135

6ीका ट कां?@ट पाई7 स

(िवद

तथा

िवदाउट

रेिनफोस मट)

458

2003

8 7200033186

08@01@2016

एरान पाई7 स 6ा. िलिमटेड

A लाक नंबर- 187, 7 लाट नंबर-

1 से 5, कारज, कम मांडवी

रोड, मांडवी, सूरत-394110

अन7 लािटसाईजड

पी

वी सी पाई7 स फार

पोटेबल वाटर स7 लाईस

4985

2000

9 7200033388

11@01@2016

इनDफटी एंटर6ाईस

7 लाट नंबर- 225, इंडि=यल

एसटेट, ग;व : दंताली, ता

कलोल, गांधीनगर 382358

अन7 लािटसाईजड

पी

वी सी पाई7 स फार

पोटेबल वाटर स7 लाईस

4985

2000

10 7200033489

18@01@2016

सोनी पोपटलाल मोहनलाल

4/5/105,

गो:वद

चकला,

टेशन रोड

िवसनगर 384315

वण तथा वण धातु)

के आभूषण- िश पकारी

शु.ता एवं मुहरांकन

1417

1999

11 7200035089

18@01@2016

वीयर8रिसट

टै नोलोिजस

6ा- िलिमटेड,

421-422, जी आई डी सी,

पोर

रमनगामडी, वडोदरा

391243

कवड

इलै =ोड

फार

मैनूयल

मटल

आक

oSfYaMx आफ काब न व

काब न मगेनीज टील

814

2004

12 7200033590

19@01@2016

:जझूवािडया तथा सF स

जी एफ 6, एफ एफ 106,

वीनस अमरिडअस

जोधपुर ?ास रोड, सैटेलाईट,

अहमदाबाद -380015

वण तथा वण धातु)

के आभूषण- िश पकारी

शु.ता एवं मुहरांकन

1417

1999

13 7200033792

21@01@2016

बलबीर रो:लग िम स 6ा.

िलिमटेड,

एस नंबर- 38/2 पी, 39/4&5,

4/1 ग;व : मोरैई

मौरैई वटार रोड, वलसाद,

वापी-396191

टील

फार

जनरल

टकचरल परपस

2062

2011

14 7200033893

21@01@2016

सटैनरी

पालीटै स

6ाइवेट

िलिमटेड, जी 2 तथा 3, वराज

इंटीGे8टड

टै सटाईल

पाक

िलिमटेड, बारेजा, एन एच

नंबर 8, पी ओ िबडाज,

खेडा अहमदाबाद -383425

टै सटाईलस

हाई

डिसटी पॉलीथलीन (एच

डी

पी

ई)

/पाली6ापीिलन (पी पी)

वोवन सैक फार पैके:जग

आफ 50 कलोGाम

फुडGेन

14887

2014

15 7200033691

22@01@2016

बलबीर रो:लग िम स 6ा.

िलिमटेड,

एस नंबर-38/2 पी, 39/4 और

5, 4/1 ग;व : मोरैई

मौरैई वटार रोड, वलसाद,

वापी-396191

हाई

=थ

िडफाम ड

स् टील बास तथा वायस

फार कां?@ट रेिनफोस मट

1786

2008

3832

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 20, 2016/ SRAVANA 29, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Øe

lalalala-

Ykkblsal

la[;k

Lohd`r djus dh

frfFk o

frfFk o"kZ"kZ"kZ"kZ @ekg

ekg

Ykkbls

Ykkblsal/kkjh dk uke o Ikr

l/kkjh dk uke o Ikr

l/kkjh dk uke o Ikrk

Hkkjrh; ekud dk

'kh

'kh'kh

'kh"kZ"kZ"kZ"kZd

Hkk ek

la[;k

Hkkx

vuq

o"kZ"kZ"kZ"kZ

16 7200033994

27@01@2016

वाितक पाईप इंड =ीज

44 एंड 45, िनम ल इंडि=यल

पाक ,

जी आई डी सी, गोजा8रया,

मेहसाना-382825

अन7 लािटसाईजड

पी

वी सी पाई7 स फार

पोटेबल वाटर स7 लाईस

4985

2000

17 7200034087

27@01@2016

वHण िबवरेिजस

एट पो ट : रोला, सवI नंबर-

222

हाउस नंबर- 483,

रोला

फतक, एन एच 8,

डुंगरी, वलसाद

पैकेजबंद

पेयजल (अदर

दैन

पैके ड नेचुरल िमनरल

वाटर)

14543

2004

18 7200034188

28@01@2016

रानासा8रया

पालीपैक

6ा.

िलिमटेड,

727/सी, ग;व मोती बोयन

कलोल खतराज रोड,

गांधीनगर, कलोल-382721

टै सटाईलस

हाई

डिसटी पॉलीथलीन (एच

डी

पी

ई)

/पाली6ापीिलन (पी पी)

वोवन सैक फार पैके:जग

आफ 50 कलोGाम

फुडGेन

14887

2014

19 7200034289

28@01@2016

गुजरात

राफया

इंड =ीज

िलिमटेड,

455, सांतेज वडसर रोड, ग;व

सांतेज, ता कलोल

गांधीनगर-382721

टै सटाईलस

हाई

डिसटी पॉलीथलीन (एच

डी

पी

ई)

/पाली6ापीिलन (पी पी)

वोवन सैक फार पैके:जग

आफ 50 कलोGाम

फुडGेन

14887

2014

20 7200034390

28@01@2016

उमाKी

टै स7 ला ट

6ा.

िलिमटेड,

7 लाट

नंबर-728/1]

ग;व

मोतीबोयन,

खतराज-कलोल

रोड, ता कलोल, गांधीनगर-

382721

टै सटाईलस

हाई

डिसटी पॉलीथलीन (एच

डी

पी

ई)

/पाली6ापीिलन (पी पी)

वोवन सैक फार पैके:जग

आफ 50 कलोGाम

फुडGेन

14887

2014

21 7200035594

29@01@2016

भगवती गो ड वैलस ,

201,

ओरीयन आरकडे,

जाडेL वर

रोड,

भाHच-

392012

वण तथा वण धातु)

के आभूषण- िश पकारी

शु.ता एवं मुहरांकन

1417

1999

[Lka- lh ,e Mh@13%11]

MkW- jktho fdशksj >k] oSKkfud ^,Q* ,oa izeq[k

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 20] [email protected] 29] 1938

3833

MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

(Department of Consumer Affairs)

(BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS)

New Delhi, the 21^st July, 2016

S.O. 1708.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (5) of the regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards

(Certifiction) Regulations 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars of

which are given in the following schedule :

SCHEDULE

Sl.

No.

Licences

No.

Grant Date

Name and Address of the party

Title of the Standard

No.

Part

Sec

Year

7209524

01/01/2016

GAYATRI STEEL

CORPORATION

395, GIDC ESTATE

MAKARPURA,

VADODARA -390010

Irrigation equipment –

media filter

14606

1998

7200032487

01/01/2016

MILAP JEWELLERS

102,103, C B DESAI

CHAMBERS,

NEAR GUNJAN CINEMA

KOPARLI ROAD,GIDC,

VALSAD -396195

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts -

fineness and marking -

1417

1999

7200032891

01/01/2016

ZAVERAT JEWELLERS

NEAR KHODIYAR MATAJI

TEMPLE

NAVA BAZAR, BAVLA

AHMEDABAD

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts -

fineness and marking -

1417

1999

7200032992

01/01/2016

BNB BITUMEN PVT. LTD.

PLOT NO.283,

NANDESARI GIDC ESTATE,

ANGADH,

VADODARA-391340

Bitumen emulsion for

roads (cationic type)

8887

2004

7200033287

01/01/2016

CHOKSHI HIRALAL

MAGANLAL

JEWELLERS PVT. LTD.

GF/A/1 RADHE

SHOPPING MALL,

OPP. KHOKHRA CIRCLE,

MANINAGAR

AHMEDABAD-380008

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts -

fineness and marking -

1417

1999

7200032790

04/01/2016

KHUSHBOO PLYWOOD

PRIVATE LIMITED

143-A, DHANOT VILL,

CHHATRAL - KADI ROAD,

TA; KALOL, DHANOT

GANDHINAGAR-382729

Marine plywood

710

2010

7200033085

08/01/2016

PUSHTI PIPE INDUSTRIES

AT & POST: DHOKALIYA,

BODELI, NEAR ORSANG

RIVER, BODELI CHOTAA

UDAIPUR-391135

Precast concrete pipes

(with and without

reinforcement)

458

2003

7200033186

08/01/2016

ARON PIPES PVT. LTD.

BLOCK NO.187, PLOT NO.1

TO 5

Unplasticized pvc pipes for

potable water supplies

4985

2000

3834

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 20, 2016/ SRAVANA 29, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Sl.

No.

Licences

No.

Grant Date

Name and Address of the party

Title of the Standard

No.

Part

Sec

Year

KARAJ, KIM-MANDVI ROAD

MANDVI, SURAT-394110

7200033388

11/01/2016

INFINITY ENTERPRISE

PLOT NO. 225,

INDUSTRIAL ESTATE,

VILLAGE: DANTALI, TAL:

KALOL

GANDHINAGAR-382358

Unplasticized pvc pipes for

potable water supplies

4985

2000

7200033489

18/01/2016

SONI POPATLAL

MOHANLAL

4/5/105, GOVIND CHAKLA

STATION ROAD,

VISNAGAR-384315

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts-fineness

and marking -

1417

1999

7200035089

18/01/2016

WEARRESIST

TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD,

421-422, GIDC,

POR-RAMANGAMDI

VADODARA-391243

Covered electrodes for

manual metal are welding

of carbon and carbon

manganese steel

814

2004

7200033590

19/01/2016

ZINZUWADIA AND SONS

GF-6, FF-106, VENUS

AMADEUS

JODHPUR CROSS ROAD

SATELLITE, AHMEDABAD-

380015

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts -

fineness and marking -

1417

1999

7200033792

21/01/2016

BALBIR ROLLING MILLS

LTD

S.No. 38/2P, 39/1&3

VILLAGE: MORAI, MORAI

VATAR ROAD, VALSAD,

VAPI 396191

Steel for general structural

purposes

2062

2011

7200033893

21/01/2016

CENTENARY POLYTEX

PRIVATE LIMITED

G-2&3, VRAJ INTEGRATED

TEXTILE

PARK LIMITED, BAREJA, N

H NO. 8,P. O. BIDAJ, KHEDA,

AHMEDABAD-383425

Textiles — high density

polyethylene (hdpe) /

polypropylene (pp) woven

sacksfor packaging of

50 kg food grains

14887

2014

7200033691

22/01/2016

BALBIR ROLLING MILLS

PVT. LTD..

S.NO.38/2P, 39/4&5, 4/1

VILLAGE: MORAI MORAI-

VATAR ROAD, VALSAD

VAPI-396191

High strength deformed

steel bars and wires for

concrete reinforcement

1786

2008

7200033994

27/01/2016

SWASTIK PIPE INDUSTRIES

44-45, NIRMAL INDUSTRIAL

PARK,

GIDC, GOZARIYA,

MEHSANA-382825

Unplasticized pvc pipes for

potable water supplies

4985

2000

7200034087

27/01/2016

VARUN BEVERAGES

AT POST: ROLA, SURVEY

NO. 222 HOUSE NO.483,

Packaged drinking water

(other than packaged

natural mineral water)

14543

2004

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 20] [email protected] 29] 1938

3835

Sl.

No.

Licences

No.

Grant Date

Name and Address of the party

Title of the Standard

No.

Part

Sec

Year

ROLA FATAK,ON N H 8

DUNGRI, VALSAD

7200034188

28/01/2016

RANASARIA POLY PACK

PVT. LTD..

727/C,VILLAGE:MOTI

BHOYAN

KALOL-KHATRAJ ROAD

GANDHINAGAR, KALOL-

382721

Textiles — high density

polyethylene (hdpe) /

polypropylene (pp) woven

sacksfor packaging

of 50 kg food grains

14887

2014

7200034289

28/01/2016

GUJARAT RAFFIA

INDUSTRIES LTD,

455,SANTEJ VADSAR ROAD,

Vill:SANTEJ,TALUKA

KALOL GANDHINAGAR,

KALOL-382721

Textiles — high density

polyethylene (hdpe) /

polypropylene (pp) woven

sacksfor packaging

of 50 kg food grains

14887

2014

7200034390

28/01/2016

UMASREE TEXPLAST PVT.

LTD.

Plot NO.728/1,VILLAGE

MOTIBHUYAN, KHATRAJ-

KALOL ROAD,TAL KALOL,

DISTT GANDHINAGAR-

382721

Textiles — high density

polyethylene (hdpe) /

polypropylene (pp) woven

sacksfor packaging of 50

kg food grains

14887

2014

7200035594

29/01/2016

BHAGWATI GOLD

JEWELLERS 201, ORION

ARCADE, ZADESHWAR

ROAD, BHARCH,

BHARUCH -392012

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts -

fineness and marking -

1417

1999

[No. CMD/13:11]

Dr. RAJIV KISHORE JHA, Scientist ‘F’ and Head

ubZ fnYyh] 21 tqykbZ] 2016

dk-vk- 1709-—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks (izek.ku) fofu;e 1988 ds fofu;e (5) ds mifofu;e (6) ds vuqlj.k esa Hkkjrh;

ekud C;wjks ,rn~}kjk vf/lwfpr djrk gS fd fuEu fooj.k okys ykblsalksa dks muds vkxs n'kkZ;h xbZ rkjh[k ls jn~n@LFkfxr dj fn;k x;k

gS %&

vuqlwph

Øe

la[;k

Ykkblsal la[;k lh,e@,y

Ykkblsal/kjh dk uke o irk

Ykkblsal ds varxZr oLrq@izØe lEca¼

Hkkjrh; ekud dk 'kh"kZd

jn~n djus dh frfFk

dksbZ ugha

[Lak- lh,eMh@13%13]

MkW- jktho fd'kksj >k] oSKkfud ^,iQ* ,oa izeq[k

New Delhi, the 21st July, 2016

3836

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 20, 2016/ SRAVANA 29, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

S.O. 1709.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (6) of the regulation 5 of the Bureau of Indian Standards

(Certification) Regulations 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies that the licences particulars of

which are given below have been cancelled with effect from the date indicated against each :

SCHEDULE

Sl.

No.

Licences No. CM/L

Name and Address of the Licensee

Article/Process with

relevant

Indian

Standards covered by

the licence cancelled

Date of Cancellation

Nil

[No. CMD/13:13]

Dr. RAJIV KISHORE JHA, Scientist ‘F’ and Head

ubZ fnYyh] 21 tqykbZ] 2016

dk-vk- 1710-—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks (izek.ku) fofu;e 1988 ds fu;e 4 ds mifu;e (5) ds vuqlj.k esa Hkkjrh;

ekud C;wjks ,rn~}kjk vf/klwfpr djrk gS fd ftu ykblsalksa ds fooj.k uhps vuqlwph esa fn, x, gS] os Lohd`r dj fn, x,

gSa % -

vuqlwph

lwph

Øe

la[;k

Ykkblsal

la[;k

Lohd`r djus

dh frfFk o

dh frfFk o"kZ@

ekg

Ykkblsal/kkjh dk uke o Ikrk

Hkkjrh; ekud dk

Hkkjrh; ekud dk 'kh

'kh'kh

'kh"kZ"kZ"kZ"kZd

Hkk ek

la[;k

Hkkx vuq

o"kZ

7200035695

01@02@2016

काई िबवरेिजस

17 , अमर ए टेट, अिनल

टाच रोड, मैमको,

अहमदाबाद-380025

पैकेजबंद पेयजल (अदर दैन

पैकेजड नेचुरल िमनरल वाटर)

14543

2004

7200034491

01@02@2016

आर आर बी िबवरेिजस 6ा.

िलिमटेड A लाक नंबर-111,

पीपोदरा जी आई डी सी, ता :

मंगरोल, सूरत-394110

पैकेजबंद पेयजल (अदर दैन

पैकेजड नेचुरल िमनरल वाटर)

14543

2004

7200034592

01@02@2016

जैगरी वायस तथा केबलस 6ा.

िलिमटेड, 7 लाट नंबर-22, 23,

KीलM मी िवजय क" पाउंड,

पटेल ए टेट के सामने, यमुना

िमल रोड, वडोदरा-390017

पी वी सी इंसूले8टड केबल

694

1990

7200034693

02@02@2016

जयेश इलैि=कलस िलिमटेड

7 लाट नंबर-47 तथा 48,

रमनगामडी, ग;व पोर,

वडोदरा- 391243

आउटडोर टाईप Nी फेस

िडि=बयूशन =ांसफारमर

1180

2014

7200034794

02@02@2016 सुमेश इं जीिनयस 6ा. िलिमटेड

504, जी आई डी सी ए टेट,

वाघोिडया, वडोदरा-391760

आउटडोर टाईप Nी फेस

िडि=बयूशन =ांसफारमर

1180

2014

7200034895

02@02@2016 हवा इंजीिनयस िलिमटेड

7 लाट नंबर-129, बी/4,

8रसीिलयOट सी8टड का ट

आयरन एयर 8रिलफ वा वस

14845

2000

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 20] [email protected] 29] 1938

3837

Øe

la[;k

Ykkblsal

la[;k

Lohd`r djus

dh frfFk o

dh frfFk o"kZ@

ekg

Ykkblsal/kkjh dk uke o Ikrk

Hkkjrh; ekud dk

Hkkjrh; ekud dk 'kh

'kh'kh

'kh"kZ"kZ"kZ"kZd

Hkk ek

la[;k

Hkkx vuq

o"kZ

काशीराम टै सटाईल िमल

नारोल रोड, अहमदाबाद-

382405

फार वाटर व स परपस

7200034996

02@02@2016 वामैी िबवरेिजस

8, माHितधाम डुपलै स,

जलाराम सोसाइटी के पास,

दाबोई के पीछे, पासालाड

भवन, अजवा-वाघोिडया Qरग

रोड, वडोदरा

पैकेजबंद पेयजल (अदर दैन

पैकेड नेचुरल िमनरल वाटर)

14543

2004

7200035796

04@02@2016

िडओले स केब स 6ा.

िलिमटेड

7 लाट नंबर-139, जी आई डी

सी ए टेट, गोजा8रया-

िवसनगर रोड

ग;व : गोजा8रया, मेहसाना

382825

?ास:लकड पालीथलीन

इंसूले8टड पी वी सी शीथड

केबल

7098

1988

7200035897

04@02@2016

िडओले स केब स 6ा.

िलिमटेड, 7 लाट नंबर-139,

जी आई डी सी ए टेट,

गोजा8रया-िवसनगर रोड,

ग;व : गोजा8रया, मेहसाना

382825

पी वी सी इंसूले8टड (हैवी

डयूटी) इलैि =क केब स

1554

1988

7200035190

04@02@2016

एन जे ए इंड =ीज 6ा.

िलिमटेड

484, जी आई डी सी

इंडि=यल ए टेट, मंजूसर,

वडोदरा 391775

आउटडोर टाईप Nी फेस

िडि=बयूशन =ांसफारमर

1180

2014

7200035291

05@02@2016

आिटन पाई7 स 6ा िलिमटेड

7 लाट नंबर 46-48, A लाक

नंबर 219, सहेली

कंपाउंड, कारंज, सूरत,

मांडवी 394110

अन7 लािटसाईड पी वी सी

पाईपस फार पोटेबल वाटर

स7 लाईस

4985

2000

7200035392

05@02@2016

वराज 7 लािटक इंड =ीज

20, 21, 41, 42, 43,

अमरनाथ ए टेट, बंसीधर

रो:लग िमल के सामने,

नारोल, अहमदाबाद 382405

फQटग फार 8रिजड नान

मैटैिलक कांडयूटस

3419

1988

7200035493

05@02@2016

जै" स इंिजिनयQरग

यूिनट-2, बी/144, माHित

इंडि=यल ए टेट,

सबमSसबल प" पसैट

8034

2002

3838

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 20, 2016/ SRAVANA 29, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Øe

la[;k

Ykkblsal

la[;k

Lohd`r djus

dh frfFk o

dh frfFk o"kZ@

ekg

Ykkblsal/kkjh dk uke o Ikrk

Hkkjrh; ekud dk

Hkkjrh; ekud dk 'kh

'kh'kh

'kh"kZ"kZ"kZ"kZd

Hkk ek

la[;k

Hkkx vuq

o"kZ

फायर टेशन के सामने, Tु ट

माकेट के पास, नरोडा रोड,

अहमदाबाद 380025

7200036293

05@02@2016

ि6यंका वैलस

66 राजKी नगर को ओप

हाउ:सग सोसाइटी िलिमटेड

छापरा, नवसारी 396445

वण तथा वण धातु) के

आभूषण- िश पकारी शु.ता

एवं मुहरांकन

1417

1999

7200036394

05@02@2016

Kी नारायण जवैलस

गालागोटािडया नी पोल,

3490/93/94

चोकसी बाजार, उमरेठ, आनंद

388220

वण तथा वण धातु) के

आभूषण- िश पकारी शु.ता

एवं मुहरांकन

1417

1999

7200035998

08@02@2016

नारायण वाटर तथा

िबवरेिजस

208, गोपालचरण इंडि=यल

हब, कुंजाड बाकरोल,

अहमदाबाद इंदौर, 200 फ@ट

रोड, ओढव Qरग रोड से कनभा

हाइवे के पास, बाकरोल

बजरंग, दस?ोई, अहमदबाद

382430

पैकेजबंद पेयजल (अदर दैन

पैकेजड नेचुरल िमनरल वाटर)

14543

2004

7200036091

10@02@2016

सेई स

1801/9, 4 फेस, Kी साई

X लास कंपाउंड, जी आई डी सी

ए टेट, िवYल उZोगनगर,

आनंद 388121

ए स7 लोिसव एटमासफयस

पाट 1 इकयूपमट 6ोटै शन

बाय फलेम6ुफ एनकलोसरस

‘’डी’’

आई

एस@आई

ई सी

60079

2006

7200036192

10@02@2016

हच इंिडया 6ा. िलिमटेड

7 लाट नंबर-3ए तथा 3 बी,

बारडोली रोड, ग;व टांटी,

थाियया, तह:

पालसाना, सूरत

टील टयूबस फार मकैिनकल

तथा जनरल इंिजिनयQरग

परपस

3601

2006

7200036495

11@02@2016

भूिम 6ीका ट आ[टकलस

एट- दतरपुरा, केनाल रोड,

िनरमा के पास, पी ओ

लामडापुरा, सावली, वडोदरा

391775

6ीका ट कां?@ट मेनहोल कवर

तथा Tेम

12592

2002

7200036596

11@02@2016

अलफा =ांसफारमस िलिमटेड

1046-1048 जी आई डी सी

ए टेट , वाघोिडया

वडोदरा 391760

आउटडोर टाईप Nी फेस

िडि=बयूशन =ांसफारमर

1180

2014

7200036697

11@02@2016 पोलीकैब वायस 6ा. िलिमटेड,

?ास :लकड पालीथलीन

7098

1993

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 20] [email protected] 29] 1938

3839

Øe

la[;k

Ykkblsal

la[;k

Lohd`r djus

dh frfFk o

dh frfFk o"kZ@

ekg

Ykkblsal/kkjh dk uke o Ikrk

Hkkjrh; ekud dk

Hkkjrh; ekud dk 'kh

'kh'kh

'kh"kZ"kZ"kZ"kZd

Hkk ek

la[;k

Hkkx vuq

o"kZ

67-72 नुरपुरा, ता हलोल,

िडि= ट पंचमहल

हलोल 389350

इंसूले8टड थम7 लािटक

शीथड केब स

7200036798

12@02@2016 कुल :वगस

161-2-3 रामदेव ए टेट,

शाहवाडी बस टाप के पास

( टड), नारोल, अहमदाबाद

382405

सै फ कंटOड ि\Dकग वाटर

कुलस

1475

2001

7200036903

12@02@2016

ए बी िबवरेिजस

26- राजक मा टरनी चाली,

नवरंग फलैट के सामने, भीड़

भंजन हनुमान मंदर के

सामने, बापूनगर,

अहमदाबाद

पैकेजबंद पेयजल (अदर दैन

पैकेड नेचुरल िमनरल वाटर)

14543

2004

7200037093

15@02@2016

अंटारनाड वैलस

4/3/26, धोबीवाड, वी पी

रोड, वलसाद 396001

वण तथा वण धातु) के

आभूषण- िश पकारी शु.ता

एवं मुहरांकन

1417

1999

7200037194

15@02@2016

अंजली जवैलस

दुकान नंबर-5, सरदार

मैमो8रयम माकIट, आजाद

चौक, वलसाद 396001

वण तथा वण धातु) के

आभूषण- िश पकारी शु.ता

एवं मुहरांकन

1417

1999

7200036899

15@02@2016

गुजरात राफया इंड =ीज

िलिमटेड,

455, सांतेज वडसर रोड,

सांतेज, ता कलोल, गांधीनगर

382721

टै सटाईल - हाई डिसटी

पालीथलीन (पी पी) वोवन

सैक फार पेके:जग 10 कलो,

15 कलो, 20 कलो, 25

कलो तथा 30 कलो

फुडGेनस

16208

2015

7200038705

16@02@2016

यूिनक इलै =ोडस

7 लाट नंबर-1/बी, ओक=ाय

नाका के पास, मोडासा रोड,

जी आई डी सी ए टेट,

कापडवंज, खेडा 387620

कव ड इलै =ोड फार मैनूयल

मैटल आक वैल:डग आफ

काब न तथा काब न

मैगेनीस टील

814

2004

7200037295

17@02@2016

देिवका आट वैलरी

9/13/67, सोनी वाडो,

कृ< णा िसनेमा के पास,

दादूपंथ नी खाडक@ के सामने,

पाटन 384265

वण तथा वण धातु) के

आभूषण- िश पकारी शु.ता

एवं मुहरांकन

1417

1999

7200037396

17@02@2016

राधा कृ< णा वैलस

6 पाटीदा8रन का" पलै स,

वण तथा वण धातु) के

आभूषण- िश पकारी शु.ता

1417

1999

3840

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 20, 2016/ SRAVANA 29, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Øe

la[;k

Ykkblsal

la[;k

Lohd`r djus

dh frfFk o

dh frfFk o"kZ@

ekg

Ykkblsal/kkjh dk uke o Ikrk

Hkkjrh; ekud dk

Hkkjrh; ekud dk 'kh

'kh'kh

'kh"kZ"kZ"kZ"kZd

Hkk ek

la[;k

Hkkx vuq

o"kZ

3174, सरदार अ पताल के

सामने, बारडोली, सूरत

394601

एवं मुहरांकन

7200037699

18@02@2016

कृपाली वैलस

फतेहपुरा चार र ता, महादेव

मंदर के पास, फतेहपुरा,

वडोदरा 390006

वण तथा वण धातु) के

आभूषण- िश पकारी शु.ता

एवं मुहरांकन

1417

1999

7200037497

19@02@2016

गोपाला पाली7 ला ट िलिमटेड

7 लाट नंबर-485, सांतेज

वडसर रोड, सांतेज

ता कलोल, गांधीनगर

382721

टै सटाईलस - हाई डिसटी

पॉलीथलीन (एच डी पी ई)

/पाली6ापिलन (पी पी) वोवन

सैक फार पैके:जग आफ 50

कलोGाम फुडGेन

14887

2014

7200037598

19@02@2016

झी जे िबवरेिजस

सवI नंबर- 37/3,

7 लाट नंबर 2

अ8रहंत दाल मैल के सामने,

दाहोद, देलसर 389151

पैकेजबंद पेयजल (अदर दैन

पैकेजड नेचुरल िमनरल वाटर)

14543

2004

7200037703

22@02@2016

मैटल फास इंस

79-बी, नम दा उZोगनगर,

भोलव, होटल रंग इन के पीछे,

भाHच 392015

\मस लाज , फ स एंडस- पाट

2 : Gेड बी \मस

1783

2014

7200038604

22@02@2016

मैटल फास इंस

79-बी, नम दा उZोगनगर,

भोलव, होटल रंग इन के पीछे,

भाHच 392015

\मस लाज , फ स एंडस- पाट

1: Gेड ए \मस

1783

2014

7200038196

22@02@2016

वैभवी इंड =ीज

58-59, एट पाव ता, ग;व

पाव ता, उमरेठ, आनंद

388220

वुडन फलश डोर शटर

(सािलड कोर टाईप)

2202

1999

7200038095

23@02@2016

वैभवी इंड =ीज

58-59, एट पाव ता, ग;व

पाव ता, उमरेठ, आनंद

388220

A लाक बोड

1659

2004

7200037804

24@02@2016

हाई टैक पाई7 स िलिमटेड

ई-6, जी आई डी सी, फेस-II,

रोड एफ, सानंद,

अहमदाबाद 382170

टील टयूबस फार ट चरल

परपस

1161

2014

7200038297

24@02@2016

माHितकृपा वैलस

4412, पाडव, दाहोद

389151

वण तथा वण धातु) के

आभूषण- िश पकारी शु.ता

एवं मुहरांकन

1417

1999

7200038398

25@02@2016

^{शुभमटै स}^{ओ पैक 6ा}^.

िलिमटेड, 7 लाट नंबर-554,

वडसर खतराज रोड,

ग;व : वडसर, ता कलोल,

गांधीनगर 382721

टै सटाईलस - हाई डिसटी

पॉलीथलीन (एच डी पी ई)

/पाली6ापिलन (पी पी) वोवन

सैक फार पैके:जग आफ 50

कलोGाम फुडGेन

14887

2014

7200038499

25@02@2016

एम एम टी पालीपै स 6ा.

िलिमटेड

टै सटाई स - हाई डिसटी

14887

2014

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 20] [email protected] 29] 1938

3841

Øe

la[;k

Ykkblsal

la[;k

Lohd`r djus

dh frfFk o

dh frfFk o"kZ@

ekg

Ykkblsal/kkjh dk uke o Ikrk

Hkkjrh; ekud dk

Hkkjrh; ekud dk 'kh

'kh'kh

'kh"kZ"kZ"kZ"kZd

Hkk ek

la[;k

Hkkx vuq

o"kZ

A लाक नंबर-1644/4, ग;व

मोती बोयन ता कलोल,

गांधीनगर 382721

पॉलीथलीन (एच डी पी ई)

/पाली6ापिलन (पी पी) वोवन

सैक फार पैके:जग आफ 50

कलोGाम फुडGेन

7200039505

25@02@2016

^{कैमेट कैिमकलस 6ा}^{. िलिमटेड}

7 लाट नंबर-

6230/6231/6215, जी आई

डी सी ए टेट, भाHच,

अंकलेL वर 393002

पैस8टसाईड डैलटामैथ8रन

डA यू पी

13457

1992

7200037905

25@02@2016

वैभवी इंड =ीज

58-59, एट पाव ता, ग;व

पाव ता, उमरेठ, आनंद

388220

7 लाईवुड फार जनरल परपस

303

1989

7200038806

25@02@2016

जय भुवनेL री वैलस

पहली मंिजल, 37, 38 ,

िस.ेL वरी सोसाइटी,

दाभोली चार र ता, वेड रोड,

सूरत 395004

वण तथा वण धातु) के

आभूषण- िश पकारी शु.ता

एवं मुहरांकन

1417

1999

7200038907

25@02@2016

सोनी योगेशभाई चंपकलाल

हाउस नंबर 2710,

िभलाडवाला बक के सामने

पारसी =ीट, कलापारडी,

वलसाद 396125

वण तथा वण धातु) के

आभूषण- िश पकारी शु.ता

एवं मुहरांकन

1417

1999

7200038503

26@02@2016

मयूर वोवनस 6ा. िलिमटेड

A लाक नंबर-1485, ग;व मोती

बोयन, अर:वद इंटरनेL नल के

सामने, खतराज कलोल रोड,

ता कलोल (उतर गुजरात),

गांधीनगर 382721

टै सटाईलस - हाई डिसटी

पॉलीथलीन (एच डी पी ई)

/पाली6ापिलन (पी पी) वोवन

सैक फार पैके:जग आफ 50

कलाGाम फुडGेन

14887

2014

7200039808

29@02@2016

रb नाकर गो ड

45, साकडी शेरी नाका,

मानेक चौक,अहमदाबाद

380001

वण तथा वण धातु) के

आभूषण- िश पकारी शु.ता

एवं मुहरांकन

1417

1999

7200039097

29@02@2016

6ायोशा इलैि=कलस

11 बी तथा 33 रिव

इंडि=यल ए टेट, गुजरात

बाट:लग रोड, मनीयार टेलर

के सामने, रिखयाल,

अहमदाबाद 380023

इंड शन मोटस –एनजc

एफ@शट Nी फेस, सकवीरल

केज

12615

2011

7200039198

29@02@2016

6ायोशा इलैि=कलस

11 बी तथा 33 रिव

इंडि=यल ए टेट, गुजरात

बाट:लग रोड, मनीयार टेलर

के सामने, रिखयाल,

अहमदाबाद 380023

:सगल फेस माल ए सी तथा

यूिनवस ल इलैि=क मोटस

996

2009

3842

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 20, 2016/ SRAVANA 29, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

[Lka- lh,eMh@13 % 11]

MkW- jktho fd'kksj >k] oSKkfud ^,Q* ,oa izeq[k

New Delhi, the 21^st July, 2016

S.O. 1710.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (5) of the regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards

(Certification) Regulations 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars of

which are given in the following schedule :

SCHEDULE

Sl.

No.

Licences

No.

Grant Date

Name & Address of the party

Title of the Standard

IS No.

Part

Sec

Year

7200035695

01/02/2016

SKY BEVERAGES

17, AMAR ESTATE, ANIL

STARCH ROAD

MEMCO, AHMEDABAD 380025

Packaged drinking

water (other than

packaged

natural mineral water)

14543

2004

7200034491

01/02/2016

R.R.B. BEVERAGES PVT. LTD.

BLOCK NO.111,

PIPODARA GIDC,

TALUKA: MANGROL,

SURAT 394110

Packaged drinking

water (other than

packaged

natural mineral water)

14543

2004

7200034592

01/02/2016

JAGGERY WIRES AND CABLES

PVT. LTD.

PLOT No. 22, 23, SHRILAXMI

VIJAY

COMPOUND, OPP. PATEL

ESTATE,YAMUNA MILL ROAD,

VADODARA 390017

Pvc Insulated Cables

694

1990

7200034693

02/02/2016

JAYESH ELECLTRICALS LTD

PLOT NO.47 & 48,

RAMANGAMDI

VILLAGE: POR, VADODARA

391243

Outdoor type three-

phase distribution

transformers

1180

2014

7200034794

02/02/2016

SUMESH ENGINEERS PVT.

LTD.

504, GIDC ESTATE, WGHODIA

VADODARA 391760

Outdoor type three-

phase distribution

transformers

1180

2014

7200034895

02/02/2016

HAWA ENGINEERS LTD

PLOT NO.129, B/4, KASHIRAM

TEXTILE MILL

NAROL ROAD, AHMEDABAD

382405

Resilient seated cast

iron air relief valves for

water works purposes

14845

2000

7200034996

02/02/2016

SWAMAITRI BEVERAGES

8, MARUTIDHAM DUPLEX

NEAR JALARAM SOCIETY,

BEHIND DABHOI

PASALAD BHAVAN, AJWA-

WAGHODIA RING ROAD,

VADODARA `

Packaged drinking

water (other than

packaged

natural mineral water)

14543

2004

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 20] [email protected] 29] 1938

3843

Sl.

No.

Licences

No.

Grant Date

Name & Address of the party

Title of the Standard

IS No.

Part

Sec

Year

7200035796

04/02/2016

DEOLAX CABLES PVT. LTD.

PLOT NO.139, GIDC ESTATE

GOZARIA-VISNAGAR ROAD

VILLAGE:GOZARIA,

MEHSANA 382825

Crosslinked

polyethylene insulated

PVC sheathed cables

7098

1988

7200035897

04/02/2016

DEOLAX CABLES PVT. LTD.

PLOT NO.139, GIDC ESTATE

GOZARIA-VISNAGAR ROAD

VILLAGE:GOZARIA,

MEHSANA 382825

PVC Insulated (Heavy

Duty) Electric Cables

1554

1988

7200035190

04/02/2016

NJA INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.

484, GIDC INDUSTRIAL

ESTATE MANJUSAR,

VADODARA 391775

Outdoor type three-

phase distribution

transformers

1180

2014

7200035291

05/02/2016

AUSTIN PIPES PVT. LTD.

PLOT NO.46-48,BLOCK NO.219,

SAHELI COMPOUND,KARANJ,

SURAT, MANDVI 394110

Unplasticized PVC

pipes for potable water

supplies

4985

2000

7200035392

05/02/2016

VRAJ PLASTIC INDUSTRIES

20,21,41,42,43, AMARNATH

ESTATE

OPP BANSIDHAR ROLLING

MILL,NAROL

AHMEDABAD 382405

Fittings for rigid non-

metallic conduits

3419

1988

7200035493

05/02/2016

JEMS ENGINEERING

UNIT-2, B-144, MARUTI

INDUSTRIAL ESTATE

OPP. FIRE STATION,NEAR

FRUIT MARKET,

NARODA ROAD,

AHMEDABAD 380025

Submersible pumpsets

8034

2002

7200036293

05/02/2016

PRIYANKA JEWELLERS

66 RAJESHRI NAGAR CO. OP.

HOUSING

SOCIETY LTD. CHHAPRA

NAVASARI 396445

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts -

fineness and marking -

1417

1999

7200036394

05/02/2016

SHREE NARAYAN JEWELLERS

GALAGOTADIYA NI POLE,

3490/93/94

CHOKSI BAZAR, UMERTH

ANAND 388220

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts -

fineness and marking -

1417

1999

7200035998

08/02/2016

NARAYAN WATER &

BEVERAGES

208, GOPALCHARAN

INDUSTRIAL HUB,

KUNJAD-BAKROL,

AHMEDABAD-INDORE

200 FEET ROAD,

NEAR ODHAV RING

Packaged drinking

water (other than

packaged

natural mineral water)

14543

2004

3844

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 20, 2016/ SRAVANA 29, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Sl.

No.

Licences

No.

Grant Date

Name & Address of the party

Title of the Standard

IS No.

Part

Sec

Year

ROAD TO KANBHA HIGHWAY,

BAKROL BUJRANG,

DASKROI,

AHMEMDABAD 382430

7200036091

10/02/2016

SAIEX

1801/9, 4TH PHASE, SHREE SAI

GLASS

COMPOUND, GIDC ESTATE

VITHAL UDYOGNAGAR

ANAND 388121

Explosive atmospheres

part 11 equipment

protection by intrinsic

safety "i"

IS/IEC

60079

2006

7200036192

10/02/2016

HUTCH INDIA PVT. LTD.

PLOT NO.3A AND 3B, BARDOLI

ROAD

VILAGE: TANTI , THAIYA

TEH: PALSANA, SURAT

Steel tubes for

mechanical and general

engineering purposes

3601

2006

7200036495

11/02/2016

BHOOMI PRECAST ARTICLES

AT. DATARPURA, CANAL

ROAD

NEAR NIRMA, P O

LAMDAPURA

SAVLI, VADODARA 391775

Precast concrete

manhole cover and

frame -

12592

2002

7200036596

11/02/2016

ALFA TRANSFORMERS LTD

1046-1048 GIDC ESTATE,

WAGHODIA

VADODARA 391760

Outdoor type three-

phase distribution

transformers

1180

2014

7200036697

11/02/2016

POLYCAB WIRES PVT. LTD.

67-72 NURPURA,TALUKA-

HALOL, DIST

PANCHMAHALHALOL 389350

Cross-linked

polyethylene insulated

thermoplastic sheathed

cables

7098

1993

7200036798

12/02/2016

COOL WINGS

161-2-3 RAMDEV ESTATE

MEAR SHAHWADI BUS STOP

(STAND)

NAROL, AHMEDABAD 382405

Self-contained drinking

water coolers

1475

2001

7200036903

12/02/2016

A B BEVERAGES

26. RAJAK MASTERNI CHALI

OPP. NAVRANG FLAT, OPP.

BHID BHANJAN

HANUMAN MANDIR,

BAPUNAGAR

AHMEDABAD 380024

Packaged drinking

water (other than

packaged

natural mineral water)

14543

2004

7200037093

15/02/2016

ANTARNAD JEWELLERS

4/3/26, DHOBIVAD, V P ROAD

VALSAD 396001

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts -

fineness and marking -

1417

1999

7200037194

15/02/2016

ANJALI JEWELLERS

DUKAN NO.5, SARDAR

MEMORIUM MARKET

AZAD CHOWK, VALSAD

396001

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts -

fineness and marking -

1417

1999

7200036899

15/02/2016

GUJARAT RAFFIA INDUSTRIES

LTD,

Textiles - high density

polyethylene (hdpe)/

16208

2015

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 20] [email protected] 29] 1938

3845

Sl.

No.

Licences

No.

Grant Date

Name & Address of the party

Title of the Standard

IS No.

Part

Sec

Year

455, SANTEJ VADSAR ROAD,

SANTEJ,TALUKA KALOL

GANDHINAGAR 382721

polypropylene (pp)

woven sacks for

packaging 10 kg, 15

kg, 20 kg, 25 kg and 30

kg foodgrains -

7200038705

16/02/2016

UNIQUE ELECTRODES

PLOT NO.1/B, NEAR OCTROI

NAKA,

MODASA ROAD, GIDC ESTATE

KAPADWANJ, KHEDA 387620

Covered electrodes for

manual metal arc

welding of carbon and

carbon manganese steel

814

2004

7200037295

17/02/2016

DEVIKA ART JEWELLERY

9/13/67, SONI WADO, NEAR

KRISHNA CINEMA

OPP DADUPANTH NI KHADKI,

PATAN, PATAN 384265

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts -

fineness and marking -

1417

1999

7200037396

17/02/2016

RADHA KRISHNA JEWELLERS

6 PATIDARIN COMPLEX

3174, OPP: SARDAR HOSPITAL

BARDOLI, SURAT-394601

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts -

fineness and marking -

1417

1999

7200037699

18/02/2016

KRUPALI JEWELLERS

FATEHPURA CHAR RASTA,

NEAR MAHADEV TEMPLE

FATEHPURA, VADODARA

390006

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts -

fineness and marking -

1417

1999

7200037497

19/02/2016

GOPALA POLYPLAST LTD

PLOT NO.485, SANTEJ-VADSAR

ROAD SANTEJ, TAL: KALOL,

GANDHINAGAR

SANTEJ 382721

Textiles — high

density polyethylene

(hdpe) /

polypropylene (pp)

woven sacksfor

packaging

of 50 kg food grains —

14887

2014

7200037598

19/02/2016

G J BEVERAGES

SURVEY NO. 37/3, PLOT NO.2

OPP ARIHANT DAL MELL

DAHOD, DELSAR 389151

Packaged drinking

water (other than

packaged

natural mineral water)

14543

2004

7200037703

22/02/2016

METAL FASS INC

79-B, NARMADA UDYOG

NAGAR,

BHOLAV, BEHIND HOTEL

RANG

INN, BHARUCH 392015

Drums, large, fixed

ends, part 2 grade b

drums

1783

2014

7200038604

22/02/2016

METAL FASS INC

79-B, NARMADA UDYOG

NAGAR,

BHOLAV, BEHIND HOTEL

RANG

INN, BHARUCH 392015

Drums, large, fixed

ends part 1 grade a

drums

1783

2014

3846

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 20, 2016/ SRAVANA 29, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Sl.

No.

Licences

No.

Grant Date

Name & Address of the party

Title of the Standard

IS No.

Part

Sec

Year

7200038196

22/02/2016

VAIBHAVI INDUSTRIES

58-59, AT: PARVATA, VILL:

PARVTA

UMRETH, ANAND 388220

Wooden flush door

shutters (solid core

type)

2202

1999

7200038095

23/02/2016

VAIBHAVI INDUSTRIES

58-59, AT: PARVATA, VILL:

PARVTA

UMRETH, ANAND 388220

Block boards

1659

2004

7200037804

24/02/2016

HI TECH PIPES LIMITED

E-6, GIDC, PHASE-II, ROAD-F

SANAND, AHMEDABAD 382170

Steel tubes for

structural purposes

1161

2014

7200038297

24/02/2016

MARUTIKRUPA

JEWELLERS

4412, PADAV DAHOD 389151

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts -

fineness and marking -

1417

1999

7200038398

25/02/2016

SHUBHAM TEX O PACK PVT.

LTD.

PLOT NO.554, VADSAR-

KHATRAJ ROAD,

VILL:VADSAR,TALUKA-

KALOL,

GANDHINAGAR 382721

Textiles — high

density polyethylene

(hdpe) /

polypropylene (pp)

woven sacks for

packaging

of 50 kg food grains —

14887

2014

7200038499

25/02/2016

MMT POLYPACKS PVT. LTD.

BLOCK No. 1644/4, VILL MOTI

BHOYAN

TAL KALOL, GANDHINAGAR

382721

Textiles — high

density polyethylene

(hdpe) /

polypropylene (pp)

woven sacksfor

packaging

of 50 kg food grains —

14887

2014

7200039505

25/02/2016

CHEMET CHEMICALS PVT.

LTD.

PLOT NO.6230/6231/6215, GIDC

ESTATE, BHARUCH,

ANKLESHWAR 393002

Pesticide - deltamethrin

13457

1992

7200037905

25/02/2016

VAIBHAVI INDUSTRIES

58-59, AT: PARVATA, VILL:

PARVTA

UMRETH, ANAND 388220

Plywood for general

purposes

303

1989

7200038806

25/02/2016

JAY BHUVNESHWARI

JEWELLERS

IST FLOOR, 37, 38 ,

SIDDHESHWARI SOC.,

DABHOLI CHAR RASTA, VED

ROAD

SURAT 395004

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts -

fineness and marking -

1417

1999

7200038907

25/02/2016

SONI YOGESHBHAI

CHAMPAKLAL

HOUSE NO 2710, OPP:

BHILADWALA BANK

PARSI STREET, KILAPARDI,

VALSAD 396125

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts -

fineness and marking -

1417

1999

7200038503

26/02/2016

MAYUR WOVENS PVT. LTD.

BLOCK NO.1485,

VILLAGE:

MOTI BHOYAN,

Textiles — high

density polyethylene

(hdpe) /

14887

2014

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 20] [email protected] 29] 1938

3847

Sl.

No.

Licences

No.

Grant Date

Name & Address of the party

Title of the Standard

IS No.

Part

Sec

Year

OPP.ARVIND

INTERNATIONAL, KHATREJ-

KALOL ROAD, TAL:

KALOL(N.G)

GANDHINAGAR 382721

polypropylene (pp)

woven sacksfor

packaging

of 50 kg food grains —

7200039808

29/02/2016

RATNAKAR GOLD

45,SAKADI SHERI NAKA

MANEK CHOWK,

AHMEDABAD 380001

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts -

fineness and marking -

1417

1999

7200039097

29/02/2016

PRAYOSHA ELECTRICALS

11 B & 33 RAVI INDUSTRIAL

ESTATE, GUJARAT BOTTLING

ROAD, OPP MANIYAR TAILOR,

RAKHIAL, AHMEDABAD

380023

Induction motors -

energy efficient, three-

phase, squirrel cage -

12615

2011

7200039198

29/02/2016

PRAYOSHA ELECTRICALS

11 B & 33 RAVI INDUSTRIAL

ESTATE

GUJARAT BOTTLING ROAD,

OPP MANIYAR TAILOR,

RAKHIAL, AHMEDABAD

380023

Single-phase small ac

and universal electric

motors

996

2009

[No. CMD/13 : 11]

Dr. RAJIV KISHORE JHA, Scientist ‘F’ and Head

ubZ fnYyh 21 tqykbZ] 2016

dk-vk

vkvk

vk-

1711

1711.—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks ¼izek.ku½ fofu;e 1988 ds fofu;e ¼5½ ds mifofu;e ¼6½ ds vuqlj.k esa

Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks ,rn~}kjk vf/klwfpr djrk gS fd fuEu fooj.k okys ykblsalksa dks muds vkxs n'kkZ;h xbZ rkjh[k ls

jn~n@LFkfxr dj fn;k x;k gS%&

vuqlwph

Øe

la[;k

Ykkblsal

la[;k

lh,e@,y&

Ykkblsal/kkjh dk uke

o irk

Ykkblsal ds varxZr oLrq@izØe lEca)

Hkkjrh; ekud dk 'kh"kZd

jn~n djus dh

frfFk

dksbZ ugha

[Lka- lh,eMh@13%13]

MkW- jktho fd'kksj >k] oSKkfud ^,Q* ,oa izeq[k

New Delhi, the 21st July, 2016

S.O. 1711.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (6) of the regulation 5 of the Bureau of Indian Standards

(Certification) Regulations 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies that the licences particulars of

which are given below have been cancelled with effect from the date indicated against each:

SCHEDULE

Sl.

No.

Licences No. CM/L-

Name & Address of the Licensee

Article/Process with

relevant Indian Standards

covered by the licence

cancelled

Date of

Cancellation

3848

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 20, 2016/ SRAVANA 29, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

NIL

[No. CMD/13:13]

Dr. RAJIV KISHORE JHA, Scientist ‘F’ and Head

ubZ fnYyh] 21 tqykbZ] 2016

dk- vk

vkvk

vk- 1712

1712

1712.—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks (izek.ku) fofu;e 1988 ds fu;e 4 ds mifu;e (5) ds

vuqlj.k esa Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks ,rn~}kjk vf/klwfpr djrk gS fd ftu ykblsalksa ds fooj.k uhps vuqlwph

esa fn, x, gaS] os Lohd`r dj fn, x, gSa % -

vuq

vuqlwph

lwph

Øe

la[;k

Ykkblsal

la[;k

Lohd`r djus

dh frfFk

o"kZ@

"kZ@

"kZ@ekg

ekg

Ykkblsal/kkjh dk uke o Ikrk

Hkkjrh; ekud dk

Hkkjrh; ekud dk 'kh

'kh'kh

'kh"kZd

"kZd

Hkk ek

la[;k

Hkkx

vuq

o"kZ"kZ"kZ"kZ

7200039299

01@03@2016

गुHकृपा वायर नैQटग इंड =ीज

17/18, जी आई डी सी एसटेट,

निडयाड कैमंबे रोड, आनंद, पेटलाड

388450

वैलिडड टील वायर

फैब8रक फार जनरल यूस

4948

2002

7200039303

03@03@2016

वै =न इलै =ो=ांस 6ाइवेट िलिमटेड,

11, िसरािमक कंपाउंड, सांकारडा,

वडोदरा 391350

आउटडोर टाईप Nी फेस

िडि=बयूशन =ांसफारमर

1180

2014

7200039404

04@03@2016

सb वा ईरीटैक

64, नागेL वर एसटेट, जवाहर नगर

के सामने भागीरथ एसटेट के पास,

अमराईवाडी,

अहमदाबाद 380026

फ[टलाइजर तथा कैिमकल

इंजै टर िस टम

14483

1997

7200039606

04@03@2016

साई आशीष वाटर सपलायर,

शॉप नंबर 2 और 3, ह8रहर

अपाट मट, पारस सोसाइटी के

सामने, वाघोिडया के पीछे, आ टी

ओ, वडोदरा 390019

पैकेजबंद पेयजल (अदर

दैन पैकेजड नेचुरल

िमनरल वाटर)

14543

2004

7200039707

04@03@2016

कुबेर जवैलस

235/1, पारावाडी बाजार, मेन

रोड, कलोल पंचमहल 389330

वण तथा वण धातु) के

आभूषण- िश पकारी

शु.ता एवं मुहरांकन

1417

1999

7200039909

10@03@2016

योको टोन कां8टनटल िलिमटेड,

सवI नंबर 785 पी, कोठ, बागोदरा

तारापुर रोड, आरनेज ग;व के पास,

अहमदाबाद

आटोमो8टव िवहीकल-

टयूबस फार F यूमै8टक

टायर

13098

2012

7200040082

10@03@2016

माड न लैिमनेटस िलिमटेड

A लाक नंबर 273, हाजीपुर ग;व

ता कलोल, गांधीनगर 382721

टै सटाईलस – हाई डिसटी

पॉलीथलीन (एच डी पी

ई) /पाली6ापिलन (पी पी)

वोवन सैक फार पैके:जग

आफ 50 कलाGाम

फुडGेन

14887

2014

7200040486

10@03@2016

अहमदाबाद =ाईपस 6ा. िलिमटेड ^टी^{ल पाईपस फार वाटर}

तथा िसवेज

3589

2001

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 20] [email protected] 29] 1938

3849

Øe

la[;k

Ykkblsal

la[;k

Lohd`r djus

dh frfFk

o"kZ@

"kZ@

"kZ@ekg

ekg

Ykkblsal/kkjh dk uke o Ikrk

Hkkjrh; ekud dk

Hkkjrh; ekud dk 'kh

'kh'kh

'kh"kZd

"kZd

Hkk ek

la[;k

Hkkx

vuq

o"kZ"kZ"kZ"kZ

(टयूब िडिवजन )

7 लाट नंबर .49, पैक@ -4-5-6-7,

ओलमिपक लैिमनेटड के पास, ग;व

कारोली, ता कलोल, गांधीनगर

382721

7200040587

10@03@2016

अहमदाबाद =ाईपस 6ा. िलिमटेड

(टयूब िडिवजन )

7 लाट नंबर - 49, पैक@ -4-5-6-7,

ओलमिपक लैिमनेटड के पास, ग;व

कारोली, ता कलोल, गांधीनगर

382721

टील टयूबस फार

मकैिनकल तथा जनरल

इंिजिनयQरग परपस

3601

2006

7200040183

11@03@2016

यूिनवस ल िबवरेिजस

टनामट नंबर.17-बी-91-5687-1-

001, 5687 जे पी नगर कूल के

सामने, अंकुर सोसाइटी के पास

सूरत

पैकेजबंद पेयजल (अदर

दैन पैकेजड नेचुरल

िमनरल वाटर)

14543

2004

7200040284

11@03@2016

एस के पी =ांसफामस

7 लाट नंबर 519 अंकुर आयल

िमल के सामने ग;व रकनपुर , ता

कलोल, गांधीनगर 382721

आउटडोर टाईप Nी फेस

िडि=बयूशन =ांसफारमर

1180

2014

7200040385

11@03@2016

7 लै8टनम टाईअप 6ा. िलिमटेड

A लाक नंबर 214, सोखली ग;व, ता

िवरमगाम अहमदाबाद 382150

टै सटाईलस – हाई डिसटी

पॉलीथलीन (एच डी पी

ई) /पाली6ापिलन (पी पी)

वोवन सैक फार पैके:जग

आफ 50 कलाGाम

फुडGेन

14887

2014

7200041892

11@03@2016

पैन इंटरिमिडयेटड 6ा. िलिमटेड

7 लाट नंबर 1735, तीसरा फेस, जी

आई डी सी,

वापी, वलसाद 396195

सोलवट िसमOट फार यूस

िवद अन7 लािटसाईजड

पालीिवनाईल लोराइड

7 लािटक पाईप तथा

फQटग

14182

1994

7200040688

17@03@2016

वीर 7 लािटकस 6ा. िलिमटेड

A लाक नंबर - 327, सांतेज वडसर

रोड, सांतेज ता कलोल

गांधीनगर

टै सटाईल तारपोिलन मेड

Tाम हाई डिसटी

पालीथलीन वोवन

फैब8रक

7903

2011

7200040789

17@03@2016

रोयल पोली 7 ला ट

A लाक नंबर 830 7 लाट नंबर 11,

ग;व धुंधर ग;व

हाई डिसटी पालीथलीन

पाईपस फार पोटेबल

वाटर स" लाईस

4984

1995

3850

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 20, 2016/ SRAVANA 29, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Øe

la[;k

Ykkblsal

la[;k

Lohd`r djus

dh frfFk

o"kZ@

"kZ@

"kZ@ekg

ekg

Ykkblsal/kkjh dk uke o Ikrk

Hkkjrh; ekud dk

Hkkjrh; ekud dk 'kh

'kh'kh

'kh"kZd

"kZd

Hkk ek

la[;k

Hkkx

vuq

o"kZ"kZ"kZ"kZ

साबरकांठा, िह" मतनगर 383001

7200040890

17@03@2016

Kीजी आईस तथा िमनरल आर ओ

वाटर

एट जेतपुर, पी ओ दूिधया

ता िलमखेडा दाहोद 389146

पैकेजबंद पेयजल (अदर

दैन पैकेजड नेचुरल

िमनरल वाटर)

14543

2004

7200040991

17@03@2016

एनबी ई मोटस 6ा. िलिमटेड

1-7, ितHपित एसटेट

बांबे हाउ:सग के सामने, िमलन

िसनेमा रोड,

सरसपुर , अहमदाबाद

ए स7 लोिसव

एटमासफयस

पाट 1 इकयूपमट 6ोटै शन

बाय फलेम6ुफ

एनकलोसरस " डी "

आई एस/

आई ई

सी

60079

2007

7200041084

17@03@2016

डी आई प" पस

76, ितHपित एसटेट, अंबर िसनेमा

के पीछे , मनसा क@ मिजद के पास

बापूनगर अहमदाबाद 380024

सबमSसबल प" पसैट

8034

2002

7200041185

17@03@2016

िलबरो इंड =ीज 6ा. िलिमटेड

332,333,334, िशव भिe इंड,

पालसाना सूरत गुजरात 394305

पैकेजबंद पेयजल (अदर

दैन पैकेजड नेचुरल

िमनरल वाटर)

14543

2004

7200041286

18@03@2016

Kी गण गणपतये िबवरेिजस

सवI नंबर 16, टैनामट नंबर 27ए -

11-0471-0-001, 7 लाट नंबर -13

Gाउंड फलोर + पहली मंिजल,

आिशयाड सोसाइटी, यू एम रोड,

उधना ग;व सूरत 394210

पैकेजबंद पेयजल (अदर

दैन पैकेजड नेचुरल

िमनरल वाटर)

14543

2004

7200041387

21@03@2016

Kी साई िबवरेिजस

सवI नंबर - 7, 7 लाट नंबर - 1, पैक@

54 से 57, (Gाउंड फलोर )

ह8रपाथ 7 लाजा , फाटकवाडी टंक@ ,

वेद रोड, सूरत 395004

पैकेजबंद पेयजल (अदर

दैन पैकेजड नेचुरल

िमनरल वाटर)

14543

2004

7200041488

21@03@2016

आदश 7 लांट 6ाटै ट

िलिमटेड 604, जी आई डी सी,

आनंद, िवठठल उZोगनगर

388121

सािलड बाओ मास चू हा

13152

1991

7200041589

21@03@2016

डांके टै नोइल =ो 6ा. िलिमटेड

244/8, जी आई डी सी इंडि=यल

एसटेट वाघोिडया, वडोदरा

391760

आउटडोर टाईप Nी फेस

िडि=बयूशन =ांसफारमर

1180

2014

7200041690

21@03@2016

डांके इलैि=कलस िलिमटेड

776-778, जी आई डी सी

आउटडोर टाईप Nी फेस

िडि=बयूशन =ांसफारमर

1180

2014

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 20] [email protected] 29] 1938

3851

Øe

la[;k

Ykkblsal

la[;k

Lohd`r djus

dh frfFk

o"kZ@

"kZ@

"kZ@ekg

ekg

Ykkblsal/kkjh dk uke o Ikrk

Hkkjrh; ekud dk

Hkkjrh; ekud dk 'kh

'kh'kh

'kh"kZd

"kZd

Hkk ek

la[;k

Hkkx

vuq

o"kZ"kZ"kZ"kZ

इंडि=यल एसटेट वाघोिडया,

वडोदरा 391760

7200041791

23@03@2016

कृ< णा इंिजिनयस

10, आशुतोश एसटेट, जाक

(देहगाम ) गांधीनगर 382305

सबमSसबल प" पसैट

8034

2002

7200041993

23@03@2016

बनस िबवरेिजस

7 लाट नंबर - 22-23, खेिडयार

एसटेट, हंसापुर बस टड के सामने,

दूधसागर डेरी के पास, उंझा रोड,

पाटन 394265

पैकेजबंद पेयजल (अदर

दैन पैकेजड नेचुरल

िमनरल वाटर)

14543

2004

7200042086

29@03@2016

=ांसपैक िसलॉ स इंड =ी 6ा.

िलिमटेड

कलाली रोड, एटलाडरा, वडोदरा

390012

सोिडयम फारमलडीहाइड

स फािसलेट

4505

2015

7200042187

30@03@2016

वैल\ीप पोली7 ला ट,

शैड नंबर 61, अिभषेक एसटेट,

अ8रहंत एसटेट के सामने, िगरनार

कूटर कंपाउंड,

ओढव, अहमदाबाद 382415

ईरीगेशन इ यूपमट –

रोटेQटग 6fकलर

12232

1996

7200042591

30@03@2016

अहमदाबाद =ाईपस 6ा. िलिमटेड

(टयूब िडिवजन )

7 लाट नंबर .62, खातरेज चौकडी के

पास,

कलोल, सानंद हाइवे, खातरेज,

कलोल 382721

को ड रो ड लो काब न

टील शीटस तथा

=ाईपस

513

2008

7200042692

30@03@2016

अहमदाबाद =ाईपस 6ा. िलिमटेड

(टयूब िडिवजन )

7 लाट नंबर - 62, खातरेज चौकडी

के पास,

कलोल, सानंद हाइवे, खातरेज,

कलोल 382721

हॉट रो ड काब न टील

शीटस तथा =ाईपस

1079

2009

[la- lh ,e Mh@13%11]

MkW- jktho fd'kksj >k] oSKkfud ^,Q* ,oa izeq[k

New Delhi, the 21st July, 2016

3852

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 20, 2016/ SRAVANA 29, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

S.O. 1712.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (5) of the regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards(

Certification) Regulations 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars of

which are given in the following Schedule:

SCHEDULE

Sl.

No.

Licences

No.

Grant Date

Name and Address of the party

Title of the Standard

IS No.

Part

Sec

Year

7200039299

01/03/2016

GURUKRUPA WIRE

NETTING INDUSTRIES

17/18, GIDC ESTATE,

NADIAD CAMBAY

ROAD, ANAND, PETLAD

388450

Welded steel wire

fabric for general use

4948

2002

7200039303

03/03/2016

WESTERN ELECTROTRANS

PRIVATE LIMITED

11, CERAMIC COMPOUND,

SANKARDA

VADODARA 391350

Outdoor type three-

phase distribution

transformers

1180

2014

7200039404

04/03/2016

SATVA IRRITECH

64, NAGESHWAR ESTATE,

OPP. JAWAHAR NAGAR,

NEAR BHAGIRATH

ESTATE,

AMRAIWADI,

AHMEDABAD 380026

Fertilizer and

chemical injector

system

14483

1997

7200039606

04/03/2016

SAI ASHISH WATER

SUPPLIERS

SHOP NO.2 & 3, HARIHAR

APARTMENT

OPP. PARAS SOCIETY,

BEHIND WAGHODIA

R.T.O., VADODARA 390019

Packaged drinking

water (other than

packaged

natural mineral

water)

14543

2004

7200039707

04/03/2016

KUBER JEWELLERS

235/1, PARAVADI BAZAR,

MAIN ROAD, KALOL

PANCHMAHAL 389330

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts -

fineness and marking

1417

1999

7200039909

10/03/2016

YOKOSTONE

CONTINENTAL LIMITED

SURVEY NO. 785P, KOTH,

BAGODRA TARAPUR

ROAD,NEAR ARNEJ

VILLAGE, AHMEDABAD

Automotive vehicles

- tubes for pneumatic

tyres -

13098

2012

7200040082

10/03/2016

MODERN LAMINATORS

LTD

BLOCK NO.273, HAJIPUR

VILLAGE

TA KALOL,

Textiles — high

density polyethylene

(hdpe) /

polypropylene (pp)

woven sacks for

14887

2014

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 20] [email protected] 29] 1938

3853

Sl.

No.

Licences

No.

Grant Date

Name and Address of the party

Title of the Standard

IS No.

Part

Sec

Year

GANDHINAGAR 382721

packaging

of 50 kg food grains

—

7200040486

10/03/2016

AHMEDABAD STRIPS PVT.

LTD. (TUBE DIV)

PLOT NO.49, PAIKI-4-5-6-7,

NEAR OLYMPIC

LAMINTES, VILLAGE:

KAROLI TALUKA: KALOL,

GANDHINAGAR 382721

Steel pipes for water

and sewage

3589

2001

7200040587

10/03/2016

AHMEDABAD STRIPS PVT.

LTD. (TUBE DIV)

PLOT NO.49, PAIKI-4-5-6-

7,NEAR OLYMPIC

LAMINTES, VILLAGE:

KAROLI

TALUKA: KALOL,

GANDHINAGAR 382721

Steel tubes for

mechanical and

general engineering

purposes

3601

2006

7200040183

11/03/2016

UNIVERSAL BEVERAGES

TENEMENT NO.17-B-91-

5687-1-001, 5687 J P NAGAR

OPP. SCHOOL NEAR

ANKUR SOCIETY

VILLAGE: SURAT

Packaged drinking

water (other than

packaged

natural mineral

water)

14543

2004

7200040284

11/03/2016

SKP TRANSFORMERS

PLOT No.519 OPP.ANKUR

OIL MILL AT.VILLAGE:

RAKANPUR TAL: KALOL

Gandhinagar RAKANPUR

Gujarat 382721

Outdoor type three-

phase distribution

transformers

1180

2014

7200040385

11/03/2016

PLATINIUM TIE-UP PVT.

LTD.

BLOCK NO.214, SOKHLI

VILLAGE TA: VIRAMGAM

Ahmedabad Gujarat 382150

Textiles — high

density polyethylene

(hdpe) /

polypropylene (pp)

woven sacksfor

packaging

of 50 kg food grains

14887

2014

7200041892

11/03/2016

SPAN INTERMEDIATES

PVT. LTD.

PLOT NO. 1735, IIIRD

PHASE, GIDC, VAPI

VALSAD 396195

Solvent cement for

use with

unplasticized

polyvinylchloride

plastic pipe and

fittings

14182

1994

7200040688

17/03/2016

VEER PLASTICS PVT. LTD.

BLOCK NO.327,

SANTEJ VADSAR ROAD

SANTEJ, TAL KALOL DISTT

GANDHINAGAR

Textiles-tarpaulins

made from high

density polyethylene

woven fabric

7903

2011

7200040789

17/03/2016

ROYAL POLY PLAST

BLOCK NO. 830 PLOT NO

11, AT VILLAGE

DHUNDHAR

SABARKANTHA

HIMATNAGAR Gujarat

High density

polyethylene pipes

for potable water

supplies

4984

1995

3854

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 20, 2016/ SRAVANA 29, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Sl.

No.

Licences

No.

Grant Date

Name and Address of the party

Title of the Standard

IS No.

Part

Sec

Year

383001

7200040890

17/03/2016

SHREEJI ICE & MINERAL

RO WATER

AT: JETPUR P O DUDHIYA

TAL: LIMKHEDA DAHOD

Gujarat 389146

Packaged drinking

water (other than

packaged

natural mineral

water)

14543

2004

7200040991

17/03/2016

NBE MOTORS PVT. LTD.

1-7, TIRUPATI ESTATE

OPP.BOMBAY HOUSING,

MILAN CINEMA ROAD,

SARASPUR, Ahmedabad

Explosive

atmospheres part 1

equipment protection

by flameproof

enclosures "d

IS/IEC

60079

2007

7200041084

17/03/2016

D I PUMPS

76, TIRUPATI ESTATE

BEHIND AMBER CINEMA

NR MANSA NI MASJID

BAPUNAGAR Ahmedabad

Gujarat 380024

Submersible

pumpsets

8034

2002

7200041185

17/03/2016

LIBERO INDUSTRIES PVT.

LTD. 332,333,334, SHIV

BHAKTI IND PALSANA

Surat Gujarat 394305

Packaged drinking

water (other than

packaged natural

mineral water)

14543

2004

7200041286

18/03/2016

SHREE GAN GANPATAYE

BEVERAGES SURVEY

NO.16, TENEMENT NO.27A-

11-0471-0-001, PLOT NO.13

GROUND FLOOR + FIRST

FLOOR ASHIYAD SOCIETY

U M ROAD UDHANA

VILLAGE: SURAT CITY

Surat Gujarat 394210

Packaged drinking

water (other than

packaged

natural mineral

water)

14543

2004

7200041387

21/03/2016

SHREE SAI BEVERAGES

SURVEY NO.7, PLOT NO.1,

PAIKY 54 TO 57, (GROUND

FLOOR) HARIPARTH

PLAZA, FATAKDWADI

TUNKI, VED ROAD, Surat

Gujarat 395004

Packaged drinking

water (other than

packaged

natural mineral

water)

14543

2004

7200041488

21/03/2016

ADARSH PLANT PROTECT

LIMITED 604, GIDC ESTATE

ANAND VITHAL

UDYOGNAGAR

Gujarat 388121

Solid bio-mass

chulha

13152

1991

7200041589

21/03/2016

DANKE TECHNOELECTRO

PVT. LTD. 244/8, GIDC

INDL ESTATE WAGHODIA

VADODARA Gujarat 391760

Outdoor type three-

phase distribution

transformers

1180

2014

7200041690

21/03/2016

DANKE ELECTRICALS LTD

776-778, GIDC INDL

ESTATE WAGHODIA

VADODARA Gujarat 391760

Outdoor type three-

phase distribution

transformers

1180

2014

7200041791

23/03/2016

KRISHNA ENGINEERS 10,

ASHUTOSH ESTATE

ZAK(DEHGAM)

GANDHINAGAR ZAK

Gujarat 382305

Submersible

pumpsets

8034

2002

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 20] [email protected] 29] 1938

3855

Sl.

No.

Licences

No.

Grant Date

Name and Address of the party

Title of the Standard

IS No.

Part

Sec

Year

7200041993

23/03/2016

BANAS BEVERAGES

PLOT NO.22-23, KHODIYAR

ESTATE, OPP.HUNSAPUR

BUS STAND, NEAR

DUDHSAGAR DAIRY

UNJHA ROAD PATAN

Gujarat 394265

Packaged drinking

water (other than

packaged

natural mineral

water)

14543

2004

7200042086

29/03/2016

TRANSPEK SILOX

INDUSTRY PVT. LTD.

KALALI ROAD, ATLADARA

VADODARA Gujarat 390012

Sodium

formaldehyde

sulphoxylate

4505

2015

7200042187

30/03/2016

WELLDRIP POLYPLAST

SHED NO.61, ABHISHEK

ESTATE, OPP. ARIHANT

ESTATE, GIRNAR

SCOOTER COMPOUND,

ODHAV AHMEDABAD

GUJARAT 382415

Irrigation equipment

- rotating sprinkler

12232

1996

7200042591

30/03/2016

AHMEDABAD STRIPS P

LTD

PLOT NO.62, NEAR

KHATREJ CHOKADI

KALOL, SANAND

HIGHWAY KHATREJ-

KALOL KHATRAJ Gujarat

382721

Cold-rolled low

carbon steel sheets

and strips

513

2008

7200042692

30/03/2016

AHMEDABAD STRIPS P

LTD

PLOT NO.62, NEAR

KHATREJ CHOKADI

KALOL, SANAND

HIGHWAY KHATREJ-

KALOL KHATRAJ Gujarat

382721

Hot rolled carbon

steel sheets and strips

1079

2009

[No. CMD/13:11]

Dr. RAJIV KISHORE JHA, Scientist ‘F’ and Head

ubZ fnYyh] 21 जुलाई] 2016

dk-vk

vkvk

vk- 1713

1713

1713.—Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks ¼izek.ku½ fofu;e 1988 ds fofu;e ¼5½ ds mifofu;e ¼6½ ds vuqlj.k esa

Hkkjrh; ekud C;wjks ,rn~}kjk vf/klwfpr djrk gS fd fuEu fooj.k okys ykblsalksa dks muds vkxs n'kkZ;h xbZ rkjh[k ls

jn~n @LFkfxr dj fn;k x;k gS %

vuqlwph

Øe

la[;k

Ykkblsal la[;k

lh,e/,y-

Ykkblsal/kkjh dk uke o Ikrk

Ykkblsal ds varxZr oLrq /izØe lEc)

Hkkjrh; ekud dk 'kh"kZd

jn~n djus dh frfFk

dksbZ ugha

[la- lh ,e Mh@13%13]

MkW- jktho fd'kksj >k] oSKkfud ^,Q* ,oa izeq[k

New Delhi, the 21^st July, 2016

3856

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 20, 2016/SRAVANA 29, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Je ,oa jkstxkj ea=kky;

ubZ fnYyh] 9 vxLr] 2016

dk-vk- 1714-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ

lksukj LVksu Dokjh ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 60@2012) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

08-08-2016 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&29012@29@2010&vkbZvkj (,e)]

lehj dqekj nkl] voj lfpo

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

New Delhi, the 9th August, 2016

S.O. 1714.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 60/2012) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour

Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of M/s. Sonar Stone Quarry and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on

08.08.2016.

[No. L-29012/29/2010-IR (M)]

SAMIR KUMAR DAS, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 14^th July, 2016

Reference : (CGITA) No. 60/2012

Shri Mafatlal Ambalal Patel,

Owner, M/s Sonar Stone Quarry,

Surat Songadh Highway, Songadh, Distt. Tapi

…First Party

V/s

Shri Bhangiyabhai Bilabhai Gamit,

Nishal Falia, Vill. Kumkuwa,

PO Kumkuwa,Tal. Songadh, Distt.- Tapi

…Second Party

For the First Party

None

For the Second Party

None

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-

29012/29/2010-IR (M) dated 24.01.2012 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad

(Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of M/S Sonar Stone Quarry, Tapi, in terminating the services of the

workman Shri Bhangiyabhai Biladbhai Gamit, Watchman w.e.f. 15.11.2009 without notice & retrenchment

compensation and also not reinstating him to the service with full back wages and other benefits, is legal,

proper and just? What relief the workman is entitled to?”

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 20] [email protected] 29] 1938

3857

The reference dates back to 24.01.2012. Both the parties were served to registered post on 10.05.2012 but

since then the second party has been absent and did not respond to the notice sent to him and has also not file the

statement of claim. Thus, it appears that the second party has not been intending to prosecute the case.

Thus, the case is dismissed in non-prosecution of the case by the second party.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 9 vxLr] 2016

dk-vk- 1715-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ vks-

,u-th-lh- fyfeVsM ,oa vU; ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 130@2012) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh;

ljdkj dks 08-08-2016 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&30011@40@2012&vkbZvkj (,e)]

lehj dqekj nkl] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 9th August, 2016

S.O. 1715.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 130/2012) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour

Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of M/s. ONGC Ltd. And Others and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on

08.08.2016.

[No. L-30011/40/2012-IR (M)]

SAMIR KUMAR DAS, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 13^th July, 2016

Reference : (CGITA) No. 130/2012

1. The Asset Manager,

ONGC Ltd., Hazira, Surat.

2. M/s Demi Engineering,

C/o Asset Manager, ONGC Ltd., Hazira,

Surat

…First Party

V/s

The Secretary,

Surat Jilla Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh,

B/206, Capital Complex, Beside Pratik Row House,

Hany Park Road, Adajan, Surat

…Second Party

For the First Party

Shri K.V. Gadhia Associates

For the Second Party

None

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No.

L-30011/40/2012-IR (M) dated 30.08.2012 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad

(Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

3858

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 20, 2016/SRAVANA 29, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

SCHEDULE

“Whether the demand of the Union for regularization of services of S/Shri (1) Patel Anil M. (2) Patel

Mahendra B. (3) Patel Harshad N. (4) Patel Vinay S. (5) Patel Bharat C. (6) Patel Manish C. (7) N.

Madhukumar (8) Patel Rajnish V. (9) Rathod Chhitu K. (10) Ramesh Prasad (11) Vinod Prasad (12) Patel

Rajesh V. & (13) Rathod Nathu in the establishment of ONGC Ltd. is legal and justified? What relief the

workmen are entitled to?”

The reference dates back to 30.08.2012. Both the parties were served by registered post. Advocate Shri K.V.

Gadhia Associates has been representing the first party but despite sending notices twice to the second party, the

second party did not appear and also fail to submit the statement of claim even after a lapse of 4 years. Thus, it appears

that second party has no willingness to prosecute the case.

Thus, the case is dismissed in non-prosecution of the case by the second party.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 9 vxLr] 2016

dk-vk- 1716-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ

ykbZiQ ba';ksajsal dkiksZjs'ku vkWiQ bafM;k ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn

esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 161@2006) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks

dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 08-08-2016 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&17012@13@2006&vkbZvkj (,e)]

lehj dqekj nkl] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 9th August, 2016

S.O. 1716.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 161/2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour

Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of M/s. LIC of India and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 08.08.2016.

[No. L-17012/13/2006-IR (M)]

SAMIR KUMAR DAS, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 19^th July, 2016

Reference : (CGITA) No. 161/2006

The Senior Divisional Manager,

LIC of India,

Nadia Divisional Office, Post Box No. 57,

Nadiad (Gujarat) – 387001

…First Party

V/s

The General Secretary,

General Workmen’s Union,

Sinduri Mata Devasthan, ST Nagar Road,

Godhra (Gujarat) – 389001

…Second Party

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 20] [email protected] 29] 1938

3859

For the First Party

Shri Ambalal F. Patel

For the Second Party

None

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No.

L-17012/13/2006-IR (M) dated 23.08.2006 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad

(Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of LIC of India by terminating the services of Shri Rambhai Prembhai

Bhamanla, Development Officer, w.e.f. 01.03.2002 is legal and justified? If not, what relief the workman is

entitled to and to what extent?”

The reference dates back to 23.08.2006. Both the parties are served with registered post. Second party

submitted the statement of claim Ext. 5 on 19.04.2007. The first party submitted the written statement Ext. 12 on

29.04.2009. Since then the second party has been absent and has failed to lead his evidence. Thus, it appears that the

second party is not intending to prosecute the case.

Thus, the reference is dismissed in default of the second party.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 9 vxLr] 2016

dk-vk- 1717-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ vks-

,u-th-lh- fyfeVsM ,oa vU; ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 25@2004) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh;

ljdkj dks 08-08-2016 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&30025@3@2016&vkbZvkj (,e)]

lehj dqekj nkl] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 9th August, 2016

S.O. 1717.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 25/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour

Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of M/s. ONGC Ltd. and Others and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on

08.08.2016.

[No. L-30025/3/2016-IR (M)]

SAMIR KUMAR DAS, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 12^th July, 2016

Complaint : (CGITA) No. 25/2004

Shri Pasabhai Nathabhai Senva,

C/o Gujarat Petroleum Employees Union,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

… Complainant

V/s

ONGC Ltd.,

Sabarmati, Ahmedabad.

3860

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 20, 2016/SRAVANA 29, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Parishram Labour Co-operative society Ltd.,

Shahibagh, Ahmedabad

…Respondent

For the Complainant

Shri A.L. Saiyad

For the Respondent

Shri C.S. Naidu

This is acomplaint under Section 33 (a) of Industrial Dispute Acts, moved by the complainant on 13.10.2000.

After service, opposition party ONGC filed the written statement Ext. 19 on 01.04.2003 and opposite party no. 2

Parishram Labour Co-operative Society despite service did not file the written statement.The case was proceeded

exparte against opposite party no. 2 but the complainant has been absent since last several dates and has also failed to

lead evidence. Thus, it appears that the complainant has no inclination to prosecute the case.

Thus, the case is dismissed in non-prosecution of the case by the complainant.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 9 vxLr] 2016

dk-vk- 1718-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ ,e-

,e-Vh-lh- fyfeVsM ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 1177@2004) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

08-08-2016 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&29011@3@2001&vkbZvkj (,e)]

lehj dqekj nkl] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 9th August, 2016

S.O. 1718.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 1177/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour

Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of M/s. MMTC Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 08.08.2016.

[No. L-29011/3/2001-IR (M)]

SAMIR KUMAR DAS, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 13^th July, 2016

Reference : (CGITA) No. 1177/2004

The Chairman-cum-Managing Director,

M/s MMTC Ltd. Core I, Scope Complex,

7, Institutional Area, Lodhi Road, New Delhi – 110003.

The General Manager(P),

M/s MMTC Ltd. Core I, Scope Complex,

7, Institutional Area, Lodhi Road, New Delhi – 110003.

The Senior Manager,

M/s MMTC Ltd., D-12, Sector NU – 10/B,

Shaktinagar, Gandhidham,

(Kutch) – 370201.

…First Party

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 20] [email protected] 29] 1938

3861

V/s

The Regional Secretary,

MMTC Workers Association, Ganesh Building, Ward 12-C,

Plot No. – 592, Gandhidham (Kutch)

…Second Party

For the First Party

Mr. Amarnath M. Bhatt

For the Second Party

None

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No.

L-29011/3/2001-IR (M) dated 10.05.2001 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad

(Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the demand of the MMTC Workers Association Gandhidham for transfer of 9 workers as per the list

enclosed from Gandhidham to MICA Unit, Chandwara/ Giridih (Bihar) as there is no work available of Mica

or related to it at Gandhidham (Gujarat), is just, valid and legal? If so, to what benefits the workmen are

entitled for and what directions are necessary in the matter?”

The reference dates back to 10.05.2001. The first party submitted the vakalatpatra Ext. 6 and 12 on

18.06.2009 and 11.06.2012 respectively. The second party submitted the statement of claim on 06.06.2001 and first

party submitted the written statement Ext. 4 on 16.09.2002. But since then second party has not been present and has

also not lead his evidence despite giving dozens of opportunities even in his absence. Thus, in the said circumstances,

the tribunal has no option but to dismiss the reference as not pressed and in non-prosecution of the case by the second

party.

Thus, the reference is dismissed in non-prosecution of the case by the second party.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 9 vxLr] 2016

dk-vk- 1719-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ vks-

,u-th-lh- fyfeVsM ,oa vU; ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 1303@2004) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh;

ljdkj dks 08-08-2016 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&30012@65@2000&vkbZvkj (,e)]

lehj dqekj nkl] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 9th August, 2016

S.O. 1719.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 1303/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour

Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of M/s. ONGC Ltd. and Others and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on

08.08.2016.

[No. L-30012/65/2000-IR (M)]

SAMIR KUMAR DAS, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 18^th July, 2016

3862

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 20, 2016/SRAVANA 29, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Reference : (CGITA) No. 1303/2004

The Group General Manager (P),

ONGC Ltd.,

Hazira Project, P.O. Bhatpore,

Surat (Gujarat) – 394518.

M/s Sagar Construction,

Near Tapi Bridge, Tax Plaza, Kagdaila ONGC Road,

Surat (Gujarat) – 394518

…First Party

V/s

Shri Naresh V. Patel,

At.Bhatpur,

Taluka Choryasi, Surat (Gujarat)

…Second Party

For the First Party

None

For the Second Party

None

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No.

L-30012/65/2000-IR (M) dated 05.07.2000 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad

(Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the contract between the management of ONGC Ltd., Surat and the Contractor M/s Sagar

Construction in respect of the contractual workman Shri Naresh V. Patel is sham & bogus contract?

“Whether the demand of the workman Shri Naresh V. Patel for treating/declaring him as direct and

regular/permanent employee of ONGC Ltd or from the date of notification issued by Government of India,

prohibiting his alleged employment/work through the contract system is legal and justified? If so, to what

relief Shri Naresh V. Patel is entitled and from which date and what other directions are necessary in the

matter?”

The reference dates back to 05.07.2000. Both the parties submitted their statement of claim Ext. 4 and written

statement Ext. 8 respectively. Reference was listed for evidence of the second party but on 30.06.2016, only workman

involved in the reference Shri Naresh V. Patel, moved an application Ext. 22 for withdrawal from the reference.

Therefore, on 30.06.2016 the name of the aforesaid workman was deleted from the reference. He was the only

workman involved in the reference. Therefore, no further action was required in the reference.

Hence, the reference is finally disposed of as withdrawn.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 9 vxLr] 2016

dk-vk- 1720-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ vks-

,u-th-lh- fyfeVsM ,oa vU; ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 1315@2004) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh;

ljdkj dks 08-08-2016 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&30012@74@2000&vkbZvkj (,e)]

lehj dqekj nkl] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 9th August, 2016

S.O. 1720.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 1315/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour

Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of M/s. ONGC Ltd. and Others and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on

08.08.2016.

[No. L-30012/74/2000-IR (M)]

SAMIR KUMAR DAS, Under Secy.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 20] [email protected] 29] 1938

3863

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 18^th July, 2016

Reference : (CGITA) No. 1315/2004

The Group General Manager (P),

ONGC Ltd.,

Hazira Project, P.O. Bhatpore,

Surat (Gujarat) – 394518.

M/s Sagar Construction,

Near Tapi Bridge, Tax Plaza, Kagdaila ONGC Road,

Surat (Gujarat) – 394518

…First Party

V/s

Shri Bharat N. Patel,

At.Bhatpur,

Taluka Choryasi, Surat (Gujarat)

…Second Party

For the First Party

None

For the Second Party

None

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No.

L-30012/74/2000-IR (M) dated 05.07.2000 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad

(Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the contract between the management of ONGC Ltd., Surat and the Contractor M/s Sagar

Construction in respect of the contractual workman Shri Bharat N. Patel is sham & bogus contract?

“Whether the demand of the workman Shri Bharat N. Patel for treating/declaring him as direct and

regular/permanent employee of ONGC Ltd or from the date of notification issued by Government of India,

prohibiting his alleged employment/work through the contract system is legal and justified? If so, to what

relief Shri Bharat N. Patel is entitled and from which date and what other directions are necessary in the

matter?”

The reference dates back to 05.07.2000. Both the parties submitted their statement of claim Ext. 5 and written

statement Ext. 9 on 24.10.2000 and 10.04.2001 respectively.

On 18.07.2016, after a passing of 15 years, second party did not lead evidence and withdrew himself from the

reference. Therefore, his name was deleted from the reference as the first party did not oppose the deletion of the name

of the second party from the reference.

Thus, the tribunal has no option but to dismiss the reference as not presses.

Thus, the reference is dismissed as not pressed.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 9 vxLr] 2016

dk-vk- 1721-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ vks-

,u-th-lh- fyfeVsM ,oa vU; ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 1316@2004) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh;

ljdkj dks 08-08-2016 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&30012@67@2000&vkbZvkj (,e)]

lehj dqekj nkl] voj lfpo

3864

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 20, 2016/SRAVANA 29, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 9th August, 2016

S.O. 1721.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 1316/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour

Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of M/s. ONGC Ltd. and Others and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on

08.08.2016.

[No. L-30012/67/2000-IR (M)]

SAMIR KUMAR DAS, Under Secy.

ANNEXUE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 18^th July, 2016

Reference : (CGITA) No. 1316/2004

The Group General Manager (P),

ONGC Ltd.,

Hazira Project, P.O. Bhatpore,

Surat (Gujarat) – 394518.

M/s. Sagar Construction,

Near Tapi Bridge, Tax Plaza, Kagdaila ONGC Road,

Surat (Gujarat) – 394518

…First Party

V/s

Shri Hasmukh M. Patel,

At. Bhatpur,

Taluka Choryasi, Surat (Gujarat)

…Second Party

For the First Party

None

For the Second Party

None

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No.

L-30012/67/2000-IR (M) dated 05.07.2000 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad

(Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the contract between the management of ONGC Ltd., Surat and the Contractor M/s. Sagar

Construction in respect of the contractual workman Shri Hasmukh M. Patel is sham & bogus contract?

“Whether the demand of the workman Shri Hasmukh M. Patel for treating/declaring him as direct and

regular/permanent employee of ONGC Ltd. or from the date of notification issued by Government of India,

prohibiting his alleged employment/work through the contract system is legal and justified? If so, to what

relief Shri Hasmukh M. Patel is entitled and from which date and what other directions are necessary in the

matter?”

The reference dates back to 05.07.2000. Both the parties submitted their statement of claim Ext. 4 and written

statement Ext. 10 on 24.10.2000 and 10.04.2001 respectively.

On 18.07.2016, after a passing of 15 years, second party did not lead evidence and withdrew himself from the

reference. Therefore, his name was deleted from the reference as the first party did not oppose the deletion of the name

of the second party from the reference.

Thus, the tribunal has no option but to dismiss the reference as not presses.

Thus, the reference is dismissed as not pressed.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 20] [email protected] 29] 1938

3865

ubZ fnYyh] 9 vxLr] 2016

dk-vk- 1722-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ vks-

,u-th-lh- fyfeVsM ,oa vU; ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 1350@2004) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh;

ljdkj dks 08-08-2016 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&30011@2@2001&vkbZvkj (,e)]

lehj dqekj nkl] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 9th August, 2016

S.O. 1722.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 1350/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour

Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of M/s. ONGC Ltd. and Others and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on

08.08.2016.

[No. L-30011/2/2001-IR (M)]

SAMIR KUMAR DAS, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 12^th July, 2016

Reference : (CGITA) No. 1350/2004

The Group General Manager (P),

ONGC Ltd., Hazira Project,

P.O. – Bhatpore,

Surat (Gujarat) – 394518.

The Ahmedabad Electricity Co. Ltd.,

Power Service Div., ONGC Ltd.,

Hazira Project, Surat (Gujarat) – 394510.

M/s. AJK Associates,

B/4, Kailash Apartment Opp, Dr.Sumit Shah,

Old Sharda Mandir, Eillsbridge, Ahmedabad,

Gujarat – 380006.

M/s. Industrial & Engineering Corp. Ltd.,

22, Dhara Centre, Vijay Char Rasta, Navrangpura,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380009

…First Part

V/s

The General Secretary,

Gujarat Working Class Union,

A – 772, Anand Ganga Kasak,

Bharuch (East), Gujarat

…Second Party

For the First Party

None

For the Second Party

None

3866

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 20, 2016/SRAVANA 29, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-

30011/2/2001-IR (M) dated 16.01.2001 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad

(Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the demand of the Union to absorb/regularise the services of 9 contractual workmen (list enclosed)

as permanent and direct employees of ONGC Ltd., Hazira Surat with time scale of pay of their category of

work equivalent to their similar placed regular employees of ONGC Ltd., by declaring the Contract as ‘sham

contract’ is fair and justified? If so, to what relief the concerned workmen are entitled to, and from which date,

and what other directions are necessary in the matter?”

The reference dates back to 16.01.2001. The second party submitted the statement of claim Ext. 3 on

12.02.2001. The first party no. 4 M/s. Industrial & Engineering Corp. Ltd. submitted the written statement Ext. 30 on

19.04.2002 and first party no. 1 ONGC Ltd., submitted the written statement Ext. 15 on 10.09.2001. First party no. 2

and 3 did not prefer to file written statement. Second party has been absent since last several dates and has not been

leading evidence. Thus, it appears that the second party has no inclination to prosecute the case.

Thus, the case is dismissed in non-prosecution of the case by the second party.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 10 vxLr] 2016

dk-vk- 1723-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj lsaVªy cksMZ

vkWiQ lsdsaMjh ,tqds'ku ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] psUubZ ds iapkV (vkbZMh la- 3@2007) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

10-08-2016 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&42012@115@97&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)]

Ikh- ds- os.kqxksiky] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 10th August, 2016

S.O. 1723.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (I.D. No. 3/2007) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Chennai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of M/s. Central Board of Secondary Education and their workman, which was received by the Central

Government on 10.08.2016.

[No. L-42012/115/97-IR (DU)]

P. K. VENUGOPAL, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI

Wednesday, the 27^th July, 2016

Present : K.P. PRASANNA KUMARI, Presiding Officer

Industrial Dispute No. 3/2007

(In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of

the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947), between the Management of Central Board of Secondary Education and

their workman)

BETWEEN :

Sri K. Soundararajan

1^st Party/Petitioner

AND

The Joint Secretary

2^nd Party/Respondent

Central Board of Secondary Education

Plot No. 1630-A, “J” Block, Anna Nagar

Chennai-600040

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 20] [email protected] 29] 1938

3867

Appearance:

For the 1^st Party/Petitioner of Union

M/s. Balan Haridas, Advocates

For the 2^nd Party/Respondent

Sri G. Nagaraj, Advocate

REVISED AWARD

The Central Government, Ministry of Labour & Employment vide its Order No. L-42012/115/97-IR (DU)

dated 08.01.2007 referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication.

The schedule mentioned in that order is :

“Whether the action of the management of Central Board of Secondary Education, Chennai in terminating the

services of their workman Sri K. Soundararajan w.e.f. 30.01.1995 is legal and justified? If not, to what relief

the workman is entitled?”

On receipt of Industrial Dispute this Tribunal numbered it as ID 3/2007 and issued notices to both sides. Both

sides entered appearance through their counsel and filed claim and counter statement respectively.

The averments in the Claim Statement filed by the petitioner in brief are as below:

The petitioner joined the service of the Respondent as Peon at Nungambakkam on 05.08.1991. The petitioner

was discharging his duties diligently and to the satisfaction of his superiors. The petitioner was transferred in the year

1994. He was paid a monthly salary of Rs. 1,333/-. The petitioner was working continuously without any break. He

has completed more than 240 days of work in a calendar year. The petitioner was terminated from service by the

Respondent by order dated 31.01.1995. the petitioner has raised Industrial Dispute on account of his termination. The

Labour Commissioner had sent failure report as the conciliation ended in failure. However, the Ministry refused to

refer the matter for adjudication. So the petitioner approached the High Court of Madras and the matter was referred to

this Tribunal as decided by the Adalat held by the High Court. The termination of the service of the petitioner is illegal

and is in violation of Section-25(F) of the ID Act. The petitioner was without any employment after termination. An

award may be passed directing the Respondent to reinstate the petitioner in service with continuity of service and other

attendant benefits.

The Respondent has filed Counter Statement contending as below:

The petition is not maintainable in law or sustainable on facts. The Respondent being an educational

examining body the provisions of the Industrial Dispute Act are not applicable to the same. The petitioner is not a

workman as contemplated in the Industrial Disputes Act. It is incorrect to state that the petitioner had joined the service

of the Respondent on 05.08.1991 in the Office at Nungambakkam. So also it is incorrect to state that the petitioner was

transferred to Anna Nagar subsequently. In the Claim Statement itself the petitioner had admitted that he was working

as casual labourer in the Office of the Respondent. The Office of the Respondent at Nungambakkam was shifted to

Anna Nagar after a building was constructed for the purpose. So there was no question of transfer of the petitioner

from Nungambakkam to Anna Nagar. It is incorrect to state that the petitioner was getting salary of Rs. 1,333/- per

month and he had worked continuously for more than 240 days in a calendar year. The petitioner was employed on

daily wage basis as and when exigency arose. He had worked with the Respondent from 05.08.1991 to 30.12.1991,

from 01.01.1992 to 30.06.1992, 16.08.1992 to 30.011.1992, 01.01.1993 to 31.03.1993, 01.05.1993 to 13.06.1993,

01.08.1993 to 31.12.1993 01.01.1994 to 31.01.1994, 01.03.1994 to 15.04.1994 and from 01.05.1994 to 30.06.1994. the

service of the petitioner having been utilized on daily wage basis there was no employer-employee relationship

between the petitioner and the Respondent and there was no question of assigning any reason for termination or pay

any compensation to the petitioner. The petitioner is not entitled to any relief.

The evidence in the case consists of oral evidence of WW1 and MW1 and documents marked as Ext. W1 to

Ext. W11 and Ext. M1 to Ext. M6.

My predecessor has passed an award in the matter on 27.04.2011 directing the Respondent to reinstate the

petitioner in service with continuity of service and other benefits but without backwages. The Respondent has filed

Writ Petition No. 17419/2011 challenging this order and the Hon’ble High Court has found that the award is devoid of

reasons, set aside the award and has remanded the matter to this Tribunal for fresh consideration in accordance with

law. Thus the revised award is being passed.

The points for consideration are:

(i)

Whether the action of the Respondent in terminating the service of the petitioner is legal and

justified?

(ii)

What, if any is the relief to which the petitioner is entitled?

3868

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 20, 2016/SRAVANA 29, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

The Points

The petitioner has claimed in the Claim Statement that he has joined the service of the Respondent on

05.08.1991. According to him he was continuously working with the Respondent and has even been transferred in the

year 1994. He is said to be have been terminated by the Respondent on 31.01.1995. It is alleged by him that his

termination is in violation of Section-25(F) of the ID Act. He seeks an order of reinstatement in the service of the

Respondent.

The Respondent has admitted in the Counter Statement that the petitioner had worked with it, but only as a

casual labour. There was no transfer for the petitioner at all. The Office which was at Nungambakkam has been shifted

to Anna Nagar after a new building has been constructed for the Respondent. The Respondent has given in the Counter

Statement the period during which the petitioner has been employed as a casual labourer. According to the Respondent,

it being only a body which was conducting examinations the petitioner was employed on daily wage basis only when

exigency arose. There was no need to comply with Section-25(F) of the ID Act for this reason when the petitioner was

stopped from work, it is stated.

10.

The Respondent has advanced a technical contention in the Counter Statement that it being the educational

examining body conducting examinations for the schools affiliated with the Board for All India Secondary School

Examination and All India Senior School Certificate Examination, the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act are not

applicable to it and the petitioner will not come under the definition of workman as contemplated in the Industrial

Disputes Act. However, the Respondent has not established that the Industrial Disputes Act is not applicable to it.

Even by the admission of the Respondent that the petition was working as a casual labourer, the petitioner will come

under the definition of “workman” as any work of manual, skilled, un-skilled, technical operational or Clerical would

come under the definition of workman for the purpose of Industrial Disputes Act.

11.

What exactly was the period during which the petitioner had worked in the Respondent establishment? The

Respondent had given the list of period during which the petitioner had been working with it. This is seen stated in the

Counter Statement which was filed before the Labour Commissioner and marked as Ext. W6 also. These periods

alongwith the number of days that the petitioner had worked during each period are given probably with the intention

of showing that the petitioner had not worked for more than 240 days in a calendar year, though even as admitted by

the Respondent the petitioner was in the establishment from 05.08.1991 to 30.06.1994 intermittently.

12.

A perusal of the documents on the side of the petitioner and that of the Respondent alongwith evidence on

either side would show that enlistment of the period given in the Counter Statement is not fully correct. The case of the

petitioner is that he started to work in the establishment on 05.08.1991. It is admitted in the Counter Statement itself

that the petitioner started to work on 05.08.1991. The last date of employment shown in the Counter Statement is

30.06.1994. However, Ext. M6 would show that he was employed even thereafter. This states that the service of the

petitioner is being terminated on 26.07.1994. As could be seen he has been working with the Respondent thereafter also

as wage for the month of September 1994 also is seen paid to him on 30.09.1994. The petitioner has produced Exts.W1

to W4, different orders by which he was temporarily appointed as casual labour with the Respondent on contract basis

for different periods not ranging more than 30 days. Exts.M1 to M6 are different orders of the Respondent by which the

temporary appointment of the petitioner was terminated.

13.

All the documents pertaining to the appointment and termination of the petitioner are not available. The

documents pertaining to the appointment, if any, after 30.09.1994 are not produced at all. So there is no documentary

evidence available to prove the case of the petitioner that the last date on which he was terminated from service is

30.01.1995. However, when the facts and circumstances are taken into account the case of the petitioner that he had

worked in the establishment till 30.01.1995 is to be accepted. Ext. W11 produced by the petitioner persuades one to

make such a conclusion. Ext. W11 is the copy of the Attendance Register for the period from September 1991 to June

1993. MW1 examined on the side of the Respondent has admitted during his cross-examination that this is the copy of

the Register maintained at the Office of the Respondent. The case of MW1 is that the Attendance Register was

maintained only for the purpose of calculation of wages and proof of attendance. One aspect that could be noticed from

Ext. W11 is that this disproves the case of the Respondent that the petitioner was working only intermittently and that

also during exigencies. On going through the enlistment of the period worked by the petitioner in the Counter

Statement it could be seen that there are several gaps in the period of work. However, on going through Ext. W11 it

could be seen that there was no such gap at all. The petitioner seems to have been working continuously from

September 1991 till June 1993, as could be seen from this document. On most of the months the petitioner has been

working throughout on all the days of the month, even on holidays which would show that there was no gap in work

though several appointment orders were served on him. As seen from Ext. W1 itself the appointment on contract basis

is for a period of 30 days from 01.09.1992. Immediately after expiry of this period on 30.09.1992 i.e. on 01.10.1992

another order appointing him for another 30 days is served on him. Ext. W3 states that the period of appointment is

extended by another 30 days. So it is very much clear from the appointment orders, termination orders, Ext. W11 and

also the admission of MW1 that the petitioner was working throughout with the Respondent, without any break even

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 20] [email protected] 29] 1938

3869

though termination orders were being given to him periodically. There is no gap of even one day for appointment after

a particular termination. When the fact that the petitioner was working continuously, as seen from Ext. W11, is taken

into account there could be no doubt that the petitioner must have been working in this manner until 31.01.1995 on

which date he is said to have been terminated. MW1 had admitted during his cross-examination that though the

Respondent is intended for the work in connection with the two examinations referred to in the Counter Statement it

was doing other works also. They were publishing text books and selling books to students. They were conducting

orientation program for the Teachers. He has also admitted that they were working throughout the year. So it was not

an engagement of the petitioner for intermittent period only but continuous.

14.

The argument on behalf of the Respondent seems to be that the petitioner was being engaged for a specified

period only on contract basis and once this period expired he was being terminated and so his engagement could not be

treated to be a continuous one. This argument could not be accepted. Apparently, termination orders were intended only

as a ploy. In such case, the engagement is to be treated as continuous itself.

15.

In the present case the claim of the is for reinstatement on the ground that he was sent away without

complying with the provisions of Section-25(F) of the Industrial Disputes Act. There is no case for the Respondent that

Section-25(F) was complied with. The case was that there was no necessity for the same for the reason that the

petitioner was being engaged on contract basis only for specified periods. However, I have already found that the

engagement was continuous in nature. Therefore, the petitioner will come within the purview of Section-25(F) of the

Act.

16.

The counsel for the petitioner has referred to the decision in RAJ KUMAR VS. DIRECTOR OF

EDUCATION AND OTHERS reported in 2016 6 SCC 541 to fortify his argument that the petitioner is entitled to be

reinstated in service. In the above case, the Driver of Public School has been retrenched from service on the ground

that his services were no longer required by the School. The Apex Court has found that notice was not given under

Section-25(F)(c)of the Act. The Apex Court has further found that no evidence was available to show that the

retrenchment of the workman has become necessary as he had become surplus. Accordingly, the Apex Court has

directed that the workman should be reinstated in service with full backwages. However, the facts of the case is

different from the present one in the sense that the workman was a permanent employee of the School and had put up

service for several years in the School.

17.

In the present case, the petitioner was being engaged as a casual labour. The total period during which he had

worked in the Respondent establishment is three years and a few months. Even in such case a reinstatement could not

be said to be improper in the absence of compliance with Section-25(F) of the Act. However, even if the petitioner is

now reinstated in service, his period of employment and that also as a casual employee would be just for a few months

if his age is taken into account. Proof of exact age of the petitioner is not available. However, as seen from his

deposition which was recorded in March 2009 he was then 52 years. So he would attain the age of 60 years within a

few months. The Apex Court has stated in several many cases that reinstatement is not a must in all cases of

termination without complying with Section-25(F) of the Industrial Disputes Act. In fit cases, where the circumstances

permit, even compensation will be sufficient relief. In the circumstances I find that it is a fit case where compensation

rather than reinstatement is the proper relief. Considering the facts I fix the compensation payable to the petitioner as

Rs. 2.00 lakhs.

18.

For the above reasons, the Respondent is directed to pay Rs. 2.00 lakhs as compensation to the petitioner,

within a month of publication of the Award. If payment is not made within the time it would carry interest @ 7.5% per

annum from the date of the order.

The reference is answered accordingly.

(Dictated to the P.A., transcribed and typed by him, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this

the 27^th July, 2016)

K.P. PRASANNA KUMARI, Presiding Officer

Witnesses Examined:

For the 1^st Party/Petitioner

WW1, Sri K. Soundararajan

For the 2^nd Party/Respondent

MW1, Sri R. Venkatesh

Documents Marked:

3870

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 20, 2016/SRAVANA 29, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

On the Petitioner’s side

Ext. No.

Date

Description

Ext. W1

30.09.1992

Appointment Order

Ext. W2

01.10.1992

Appointment Order

Ext. W3

30.10.1992

Appointment Order

Ext. W4

30.11.1992

Appointment Order

Ext. W5

12.09.1996

Lodge of Complaint before Regional Labour Commissioner (C) against termination

Ext. W6

21.03.1997

The Management’s Counter

Ext. W7

21.03.1997

Reply filed by the petitioner

Ext. W8

26.08.1997

Conciliation failure report

Ext. W9

Nil

Copy of the Writ Petition No. 3870/2000 with affidavit

Ext. W10 09.12.2006

recommendation of High Court through Lok Adalat directing the Ministry of Labour to

refer the matter to this Tribunal

Ext. W11 1991-1992

Attendance Register

On the Management’s side

Ext. No.

Date

Description

Ext. M1

16.08.1992

Copy of the appointment order appointing the petitioner on daily wages for a period of 15

days w.,e.f. 16.08.1992

Ext. M2

28.08.1992

Copy of the termination order dated 28.08.1992 which shows that his services were

terminated on 31.08.1992 on completion of 15 days

Ext. M3

30.09.1992

Copy of the termination order which shows that his services were terminated

Ext. M4

09.12.1992

Copy of the termination order which shows that his services were terminated

Ext. M5

29.10.1993

Copy of the termination order which shows that his services terminated

Ext. M6

26.07.1994

Copy of the termination order which shows that his services were terminated.

ubZ fnYyh] 10 vxLr] 2016

dk-vk- 1724-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj us'kuy

fjlpZ lsaVj iQkWj xzkWmaMusV ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkj ds chp vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV ¹lnHkZ vkbZMh la- (lhthvkbZVh,) 03@2009º dks izdkf'kr djrh

gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 10-08-2016 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&42011@65@2008&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)]

Ikh- ds- os.kqxksiky] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 10th August, 2016

S.O. 1724.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award [I.D. Reference No. (CGITA) 03/2009] of the Central Government Industrial

Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the

employers in relation to the management of the National Research Centre for Groundnut and their workman, which was

received by the Central Government on 10.08.2016.

[No. L-42011/65/2008-IR (DU)]

P. K. VENUGOPAL, Desk Officer

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 20] [email protected] 29] 1938

3871

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT cum Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 29^th July, 2016

Reference: (CGITA) No. 03/2009

The Director,

National Research Centre for Groundnut,

Post Box No. 5, Ivenagar Road,

Junagadh (Gujarat) – 362001

…First Party

V/s

The President,

Saurashtra Employees Union,

City Shops 3^rd Floor, Opp. Jagnath Police Chowky,

Dr. Yagnik Road, Rajkot

…Second Party

For the First Party

None

For the Second Party

None

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No.

L-42011/65/2008-IR (DU) dated 19.03.2009 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of National Research Centre for Groundnut, Junadadh in terminating

the services of their workman Shri Sureshbhai Ratilal Vachhani w.e.f. 01.07.2002 is legal and justified? If not,

what relief the workman is entitled to?”

The reference dates back to 19.03.2009. Both the parties were served by registered post. On 13.01.2010,

acknowledgements of service were also received. Second party workman vide application Ext. 5 sought time on

14.10.2010 but till date he has refrained to submit statement of claim. More than 6 years have passed and second party

appears to have been sleeping on the matter. Thus, it appears that the second party workman is not willing to prosecute

the case.

Thus, the reference is dismissed in non-prosecution of the case by the second party.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 10 vxLr] 2016

dk-vk- 1725-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj LiksVZ~l

vFkkWfjVh vkWiQ bafM;k ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkj ds chp vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV ¹lnHkZ vkbZMh la- (lhthvkbZVh,) 227@2004º dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks

dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 10-08-2016 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&42011@30@99&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)]

Ikh- ds- os.kqxksiky] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 10th August, 2016

S.O. 1725.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award [I.D. Reference No. (CGITA) 227/2004] of the Central Government

Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between

the employers in relation to the management of the Sport Authority of India and their workman, which was received by

the Central Government on 10.08.2016.

[No. L-42011/30/99-IR (DU)]

P. K. VENUGOPAL, Desk Officer

3872

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 20, 2016/SRAVANA 29, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 26^th July, 2016

Reference: (CGITA) No. 227/2004

The Director,

Sports Authority of India,

Sector – 15, Gandhinagar – 382010

…First Party

V/s

The General Secretary,

Gujarat Rajya Ardhsarkari Audhyogik Karmachari Sangh,

4, Alap Flats, Damubhai Colony, Opp. Anjali Cinema,

Vasna Road, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380001

…Second Party

For the First Party

Shri D.C. Gandhi

For the Second Party

Shri R.C. Pathak

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-42011/30/99-

IR (DU) dated 13/16.09.1999 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in

respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether demand of the union Gujarat Rajya Ardhsarkari Audhyogik Karmachari Sangh is justified in

demanding absorption of all the security guards (as per annexure) as regular employees of Sports Authority of

India and to grant all the consequential benefits from the date of their appointment? If so, what relief these

workmen are entitled to? And whether action of the management is justified in terminating the services of

these employees by changing the contractor during pendency of conciliation proceedings? If not, what relief

the workmen concerned are entitled?”

The reference dates back to 13/16.09.1999. The second party submitted the statement of claim Ext. 5 on

31.01.2000 and first party submitted the written statement Ext. 14 on 20.08.2001 along with the documents list

enclosed Ext. 15.

The record reveals that the second party moved a special civil application 95/98 in the Gujarat High Court

wherein on 29.01.1998 the honourable high court directed the second party to move to Central Administrative Tribunal

for alternative statutory remedy.

Since 20.08.2001, the second party has been absent and has also not leaded his evidence. Record also does not

reveal as to whether the second party moved the Central Administrative Tribunal as per the direction of the Gujarat

High Court. Thus, it appears that the second party has no willingness to prosecute the case.

Thus, the reference is dismissed in non-prosecution of the case by the second party.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 10 vxLr] 2016

dk-vk- 1726-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj dkdjkikj

,VkWfed ikoj LVs'ku ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkj ds chp vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV ¹lnHkZ vkbZMh la- (lhthvkbZVh,) 163@2012º dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks

dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 10-08-2016 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&42011@70@2012&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)]

Ikh- ds- os.kqxksiky] MsLd vf/dkjh

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 20] [email protected] 29] 1938

3873

New Delhi, the 10th August, 2016

S.O. 1726.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award [I.D. Reference No. (CGITA) 163/2012] of the Central Government

Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between

the employers in relation to the management of the Kakrapar Atomic Power Station and their workmen, which was

received by the Central Government on 10.08.2016.

[No. L-42011/70/2012-IR (DU)]

P. K. VENUGOPAL, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT cum Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 20^th July, 2016

Reference: (CGITA) No. 163/2012

The Station Director,

Kakrapar Atomic Power Station,

PO Anumala, Tal. Vyara, Tapi – 394651

…First Party

V/s

The General Secretary,

Kakrapar Anumathak Karmachari Sangathan,

KAPP Township, Post Anumala,

Tapi – 394651

…Second Party

For the First Party

Shri K.V. Gadhia

For the Second Party

None

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No.

L-42011/70/2012-IR (DU) dated 22.11.2012 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the demand of the union for allowing all the workmen to use the Mobile Phones in the Plant Area of

Kakrapar Atomic Power Station, Tapi or reimbursement of Rs.350/- per month for compensating the injustice

is legal, proper and just? If so, what relief the workmen are entitled to?”

The reference dates back to 22.11.2012. Both the parties were served by registered post. First party submitted

the vakalatpatra Ext. 3 of his advocates Shri K.V. Gadhia Associates but second party neither submitted the

vakalatpatra nor the statement of claim despite an expiry of 4 years. Therefore, the tribunal has no option but to dismiss

the reference is default of the second party.

Thus, the reference is dismissed in default of the second party.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 10 vxLr] 2016

dk-vk- 1727-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj VsyhdkWe

fMikVZesaV] tkeuxj ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkj ds chp vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

3874

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 20, 2016/SRAVANA 29, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV ¹lnHkZ vkbZMh la- (lhthvkbZVh,) 1093@2004º dks izdkf'kr djrh gS]

tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 10-08-2016 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&40012@53@97&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)]

Ikh- ds- os.kqxksiky] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 10th August, 2016

S.O. 1727.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award [I.D. Reference No. (CGITA) 1093/2004] of the Central Government

Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between

the employers in relation to the management of the Telecom Department, Jamnagar and their workman, which was

received by the Central Government on 10.08.2016.

[No. L-40012/53/97-IR (DU)]

P. K. VENUGOPAL, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 29^th July, 2016

Reference: (CGITA) No. 1093/2004

1. The Telecom Distt. Engineer,

Telecom Deptt., Jamnagar - 361001.

2. The Asstt. Engineer,

Microwave Maintenance, Khambalia – 361305.

3. The Divisional Engineer,

Telecom Microwave Maintenance, K.R. Telephone Exchange,

Rajkot – 380001.

4. The Divisional Engineer,

Telecom Microwave Maintenance, K.R. Telephone Exchange,

Ahmedabad – 380001

…First Party

V/s

Shri Meraman Arsi Modhvadia,

C/o Sh. G.S. Uppal, Plot No. 381,

Ward No. 2-B, Adipur,

Kutch (Gujarat)

…Second Party

For the First Party

Shri N.K. Trivedi

For the Second Party :

None

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-40012/53/97-

IR (DU) dated 01/16.04.1998 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in

respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the Telecom Distt. Engineer, Jamnagar/Asstt. Engineer, Microwave Maintenance,

Khambhalia/Divisional Engineer, Microwave Maintenance, Ahmedabad/Rajkot, in not taking on

duties/discontinuance/terminating the services of Shri Meraman Arsi Modhvadia w.e.f. 02.01.1989 just, valid

and legal? If not to what benefits the workman is entitled for and what directions are necessary in the matter?”

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 20] [email protected] 29] 1938

3875

The reference dates back to 01/16.04.1998. Second party submitted the statement of claim Ext. 2 on

01.09.1999 and first party submitted the written statement Ext. 7 on 25.06.2001. First party substituted his advocates

on 24.07.2003 then 20.12.2004 and then 13.01.2011. First party has also filed his affidavit Ext. 13 emphasising the

concealment of facts in the statement of claim by the second party but second party since then did not respond to the

application of the first party and also did not prefer to lead evidence despite giving last opportunity on 28.03.2016. The

advocate for the first party appeared on most of the dates of hearing. Thus, in the facts and circumstances of the case,

second party appears to have been sleeping over the matter since long time and unwilling to prosecute the case. Thus,

the tribunal has no option but to dismiss the case in default of the second party.

Thus, the reference is dismissed in non-prosecution of the case by the second party.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 10 vxLr] 2016

dk-vk- 1728-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj VsyhdkWe

fMikVZesaV] tkeuxj ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkj ds chp vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV ¹lnHkZ vkbZMh la- (lhthvkbZVh,) 1094@2004º dks izdkf'kr djrh gS]

tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 10-08-2016 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&40012@50@97&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)]

Ikh- ds- os.kqxksiky] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 10th August, 2016

S.O. 1728.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award [I.D. Reference No. (CGITA) 1094/2004] of the Central Government

Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between

the employers in relation to the management of the Telecom Department, Jamnagar and their workman, which was

received by the Central Government on 10.08.2016.

[No. L-40012/50/97-IR (DU)]

P. K. VENUGOPAL, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 29^th July, 2016

Reference: (CGITA) No. 1094/2004

1. The Telecom Distt. Engineer,

Telecom Deptt., Jamnagar - 361001.

2. The Asstt. Engineer,

Microwave Maintenance, Khambalia – 361305.

3. The Divisional Engineer,

Telecom Microwave Maintenance, K.R. Telephone Exchange,

Rajkot – 380001.

4. The Divisional Engineer,

Telecom Microwave Maintenance, K.R. Telephone Exchange,

Ahmedabad – 380001

…First Party

3876

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 20, 2016/SRAVANA 29, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

V/s

Shri Ramdas Premdas Kapdi,

C/o Sh. G.S. Uppal, Plot No. 381,

Ward No. 2-B, Adipur,

Kutch (Gujarat)

…Second Party

For the First Party

Shri N.K. Trivedi

For the Second Party :

None

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-40012/50/97-

IR (DU) dated 01/16.04.1998 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in

respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the Telecom Distt. Engineer, Jamnagar/Asstt. Engineer, Microwave Maintenance,

Khambhalia/Divisional Engineer, Microwave Maintenance, Ahmedabad/Rajkot, in not taking on

duties/discontinuance/terminating the services of Shri Ramdas Premdas Kapdi w.e.f. 02.01.1989 just, valid

and legal? If not to what benefits the workman is entitled for and what directions are necessary in the matter?”

The reference dates back to 01/16.04.1998. Second party submitted the statement of claim Ext. 2 on

01.09.1999 and first party submitted the written statement Ext. 7 on 25.06.2001. First party substituted his advocates

on 24.07.2003 then 20.12.2004 and then 13.01.2011. First party has also filed his affidavit Ext. 16 emphasising the

concealment of facts in the statement of claim by the second party but second party since then did not respond to the

application of the first party and also did not prefer to lead evidence despite giving last opportunity on 28.03.2016. The

advocate for the first party appeared on most of the dates of hearing. Thus, in the facts and circumstances of the case,

second party appears to have been sleeping over the matter since long time and unwilling to prosecute the case. Thus,

the tribunal has no option but to dismiss the case in default of the second party.

Thus, the reference is dismissed in non-prosecution of the case by the second party.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 10 vxLr] 2016

dk-vk- 1729-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj VsyhdkWe

fMikVZesaV] tkeuxj ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkj ds chp vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV ¹lnHkZ vkbZMh la- (lhthvkbZVh,) 1096@2004º dks izdkf'kr djrh gS]

tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 10-08-2016 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&40012@51@97&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)]

Ikh- ds- os.kqxksiky] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 10th August, 2016

S.O. 1729.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award [I.D. Reference No. (CGITA) 1096/2004] of the Central Government

Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between

the employers in relation to the management of the Telecom Department, Jamnagar and their workman, which was

received by the Central Government on 10.08.2016.

[No. L-40012/51/97-IR (DU)]

P. K. VENUGOPAL, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT cum Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 29^th July, 2016

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 20] [email protected] 29] 1938

3877

Reference: (CGITA) No. 1096/2004

1. The Telecom Distt. Engineer,

Telecom Deptt., Jamnagar - 361001.

2. The Asstt. Engineer,

Microwave Maintenance, Khambalia – 361305.

3. The Divisional Engineer,

Telecom Microwave Maintenance, K.R. Telephone Exchange,

Rajkot – 380001.

4. The Divisional Engineer,

Telecom Microwave Maintenance, K.R. Telephone Exchange,

Ahmedabad – 380001

…First Party

V/s

Shri Dipak Kumar Dayalal Raval,

C/o Sh. G.S. Uppal, Plot No. 381,

Ward No. 2-B, Adipur,

Kutch (Gujarat)

…Second Party

For the First Party

Shri N.K. Trivedi

For the Second Party :

None

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-40012/51/97-

IR (DU) dated 16.04.1998 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in

respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the Telecom Distt. Engineer, Jamnagar/Asstt. Engineer, Microwave Maintenance,

Khambhalia/Divisional Engineer, Microwave Maintenance, Ahmedabad/Rajkot, in not taking on

duties/discontinuance/terminating the services of Shri Dipak Kumar Dayalal Raval w.e.f. 02.01.1989 just,

valid and legal? If not to what benefits the workman is entitled for and what directions are necessary in the

matter?”

The reference dates back to 16.04.1998. Second party submitted the statement of claim Ext. 3 on 01.09.1999

and first party submitted the written statement Ext. 7 on 25.06.2001. First party substituted his advocates on

24.07.2003 then 24.12.2009 then 13.01.2011 and then 28.03.2016. First party has also filed his affidavit Ext. 13

emphasising the concealment of facts in the statement of claim by the second party but second party since then did not

respond to the application of the first party and also did not prefer to lead evidence despite giving last opportunity on

28.03.2016. The advocate for the first party appeared on most of the dates of hearing. Thus, in the facts and

circumstances of the case, second party appears to have been sleeping over the matter since long time and unwilling to

prosecute the case. Thus, the tribunal has no option but to dismiss the case in default of the second party.

Thus, the reference is dismissed in non-prosecution of the case by the second party.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 10 vxLr] 2016

dk-vk- 1730-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj VsyhdkWe

fMikVZesaV] tkeuxj ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkj ds chp vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV ¹lnHkZ vkbZMh la- (lhthvkbZVh,) 1097@2004º dks izdkf'kr djrh gS]

tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 10-08-2016 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&40012@46@97&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)]

Ikh- ds- os.kqxksiky] MsLd vf/dkjh

3878

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 20, 2016/SRAVANA 29, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 10th August, 2016

S.O. 1730.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award [I.D. Reference No. (CGITA) 1097/2004] of the Central Government

Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between

the employers in relation to the management of the Telecom Department, Jamnagar and their workman, which was

received by the Central Government on 10.08.2016.

[No. L-40012/46/97-IR (DU)]

P. K. VENUGOPAL, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 29^th July, 2016

Reference: (CGITA) No. 1097/2004

1. The Telecom Distt. Engineer,

Telecom Deptt., Jamnagar - 361001.

2. The Asstt. Engineer,

Microwave Maintenance, Khambalia – 361305.

3. The Divisional Engineer,

Telecom Microwave Maintenance, K.R. Telephone Exchange,

Rajkot – 380001.

4. The Divisional Engineer,

Telecom Microwave Maintenance, K.R. Telephone Exchange,

Ahmedabad – 380001

…First Party

V/s

Shri Atul Kumar Babulal Pandya,

C/o Sh. G.S. Uppal, Plot No. 381,

Ward No. 2-B, Adipur,

Kutch (Gujarat)

…Second Party

For the First Party

Shri N.K. Trivedi

For the Second Party :

None

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-40012/46/97-IR

(DU) dated 16.04.1998 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect

of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the Telecom Distt. Engineer, Jamnagar/Asstt. Engineer, Microwave Maintenance,

Khambhalia/Divisional Engineer, Microwave Maintenance, Ahmedabad/Rajkot, in not taking on

duties/discontinuance/terminating the services of Shri Atul Kumar Babulal Pandya w.e.f. 02.01.1989 just,

valid and legal? If not to what benefits the workman is entitled for and what directions are necessary in the

matter?”

The reference dates back to 16.04.1998. Second party submitted the statement of claim Ext. 3 on 01.09.1999

and first party submitted the written statement Ext. 7 on 25.06.2001. First party substituted his advocates on

24.07.2003 then 20.12.2004 then 24.12.2009 then 13.01.2011 and then 28.03.2016. First party has also filed his

affidavit Ext. 13 emphasising the concealment of facts in the statement of claim by the second party but second party

since then did not respond to the application of the first party and also did not prefer to lead evidence despite giving last

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 20] [email protected] 29] 1938

3879

opportunity on 28.03.2016. The advocate for the first party appeared on most of the dates of hearing. Thus, in the facts

and circumstances of the case, second party appears to have been sleeping over the matter since long time and

unwilling to prosecute the case. Thus, the tribunal has no option but to dismiss the case in default of the second party.

Thus, the reference is dismissed in non-prosecution of the case by the second party.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 10 vxLr] 2016

dk-vk- 1731-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj us'kuy

fjlpZ lsaVj iQkWj iksehxzkaV ,aM vnlZ ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkj ds chp vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;&2] eaqcbZ ds iapkV (lnHkZ la- lhthvkbZVh 2@42 vkWiQ 2014) dks izdkf'kr djrh

gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 10-08-2016 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&42012@40@2014&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)]

Ikh- ds- os.kqxksiky] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 10th August, 2016

S.O. 1731.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (I.D. Reference No. CGITA 2/42 of 2014) of the Central Government

Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 2, Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between

the employers in relation to the management of the National Research Centre for Pomegranate & others and their

workman, which was received by the Central Government on 10.08.2016.

[No. L-42012/40/2014-IR (DU)]

P. K. VENUGOPAL, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.2, MUMBAI

PRESENT :

M. V. DESHPANDE, Presiding Officer

REFERENCE NO. CGIT-2/42 of 2014

EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF

(1)

NATIONAL RESEARCH CENTRE FOR POMEGRANATE

The Director

National Research Centre for Pomegranate

Near Solapur University

Solapur (MS).

(2)

M/s. SWADESHI SECURITIES

M/s. Swadeshi Securities

96, Salgar Vasti

Dongaon Road

Solapur (MS).

AND

THEIR WORKMAN

Smt. Gangabai B. Kale

A/P. Bale

Tal. North Solapur

Maharashtra 413 001.

APPEARANCES:

FOR THE EMPLOYER

Mr. S.P. Chinchwadkar, Advocate

FOR THE WORKMAN

No appearance

Mumbai, dated the 13^th July, 2016

3880

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 20, 2016/SRAVANA 29, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

AWARD

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment by its Order No.L-42012/40/2014-IR (DU),

dated 21.07.2014 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2 (A) of Section

10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 have referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

“Whether the demand of the workman Smt. Gangabai B. Kale for asking regularisation as an employee of

National Research Centre for Pomegranate, Solapur is legal and justified? If yes to what relief the workman is

entitled to?”

After receipt of the Reference, notices were issued to both the parties. Acknowledgement of notice served on

the second party Workman is at Ex-5. On the first date of hearing, First party/ management filed Vakalatnama of Shri

S.P. Chinchwadkar. Second party/ workman remained absent though served with notice. Thereafter the matter was

adjourned on several occasions for filing Statement of Claim by workman. Neither second party/ workman appeared

before this Tribunal nor filed her statement of claim. Without Statement of claim, the Reference cannot be decided on

merits and the same deserves to be dismissed. Thus I pass the following order:

ORDER

Reference stands dismissed for want of prosecution.

Date: 13.07.2016

M. V. DESHPANDE, Presiding Officer/Judge

ubZ fnYyh] 10 vxLr] 2016

dk-vk- 1732-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj us'kuy

fjlpZ lsaVj iQkWj iksehxzkaV ,aM vnlZ ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkj ds chp vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;&2] eaqcbZ ds iapkV (lnHkZ la- lhthvkbZVh 2@46 vkWiQ 2014) dks izdkf'kr djrh

gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 10-08-2016 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&42012@45@2014&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)]

Ikh- ds- os.kqxksiky] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 10th August, 2016

S.O. 1732.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (I.D. Reference No. CGIT- 2/46 of 2014) of the Central Government

Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 2, Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between

the employers in relation to the management of the National Research Centre for Pomegranate & others and their

workman, which was received by the Central Government on 10.08.2016.

[No. L-42012/45/2014-IR (DU)]

P. K. VENUGOPAL, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.2, MUMBAI

PRESENT :

M. V. DESHPANDE, Presiding Officer

REFERENCE NO. CGIT-2/46 of 2014

EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF

(1)

NATIONAL RESEARCH CENTRE FOR POMEGRANATE

The Director

National Research Centre for Pomegranate

Near Solapur University

Solapur (MS).

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 20] [email protected] 29] 1938

3881

(2)

M/s. SWADESHI SECURITIES

M/s. Swadeshi Securities

96, Salgar Vasti

Dongaon Road

Solapur (MS).

AND

THEIR WORKMAN

Shri Dharma Ram Rathod

Basaveshwar Nagar

Post Degaon

Tal. North Solapur

Maharashtra 413 002

APPEARANCES:

FOR THE EMPLOYER

Mr. S. P. Chinchwadkar, Advocate

FOR THE WORKMAN

No appearance

Mumbai, dated the 13^th July, 2016

AWARD

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment by its Order No.L-42012/45/2014-IR (DU), dated

22.07.2014 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2 (A) of Section 10 of

the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 have referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

“Whether the demand of the workman Shri Dharam Raj Rathod for asking regulation as an employee of

National Research Centre for Pomegranate, Solapur is legal and justified? If yes, to what relief the workman

is entitled to?”

After receipt of the Reference, notices were issued to both the parties. Acknowledgement of notice served on

the second party Workman is at Ex-5. On the first date of hearing, First party/ management filed Vakalatnama of Shri

S.P. Chinchwadkar. Second party workman remained absent though served with notice. Thereafter the matter was

adjourned on several occasions for filing Statement of Claim by workman. Neither second party/ workman appeared

before this Tribunal nor filed his statement of claim. Without Statement of claim, the Reference cannot be decided on

merits and the same deserves to be dismissed. Thus I pass the following order:

ORDER

Reference stands dismissed for want of prosecution.

Date: 13.07.2016

M. V. DESHPANDE, Presiding Officer/Judge

ubZ fnYyh] 10 vxLr] 2016

dk-vk- 1733-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj us'kuy

fjlpZ lsaVj iQkWj iksehxzkaV ,aM vnlZ ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkj ds chp vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;&2] eaqcbZ ds iapkV (lnHkZ la- lhthvkbZVh&2@63 vkWiQ 2014) dks izdkf'kr

djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 10-08-2016 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&42012@62@2014&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)]

Ikh- ds- os.kqxksiky] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 10th August, 2016

S.O. 1733.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (I.D. Reference No. CGIT-2/63 of 2014) of the Central Government

Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 2, Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between

the employers in relation to the management of the National Research Centre for Pomegranate & others and their

workman, which was received by the Central Government on 10.08.2016.

[No. L-42012/62/2014-IR (DU)]

P. K. VENUGOPAL, Desk Officer

3882

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 20, 2016/SRAVANA 29, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.2, MUMBAI

PRESENT :

M. V. DESHPANDE, Presiding Officer

REFERENCE NO. CGIT-2/63 of 2014

EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF

(1)

NATIONAL RESEARCH CENTRE FOR POMEGRANATE

The Director

National Research Centre for Pomegranate

Near Solapur University

Solapur (MS).

(2)

M/s. SWADESHI SECURITIES

M/s. Swadeshi Securities

96, Salgar Vasti

Dongaon Road

Solapur (MS).

AND

THEIR WORKMAN

Shri Baban J. Jadhav

R/o. Kedgaon

Tal. North Solapur

Maharashtra 413 002

APPEARANCES:

FOR THE EMPLOYER

Mr. S. P. Chinchwadkar, Advocate

FOR THE WORKMAN

No appearance

Mumbai, dated the 13^th July, 2016

AWARD

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment by its Order No.L-42012/62/2014-IR (DU),

dated 23.07.2014 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2 (A) of Section

10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 have referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

“Whether the demand of the workman Shri Baban J. Jadhav for asking regulation as an employee of National

Research Centre for Pomegranate, Solapur is legal and justified? If yes, to what relief the workman is entitled

to?”

After receipt of the Reference, notices were issued to both the parties. Acknowledgement of notice served on

the second party Workman is at Ex-5. On the first date of hearing, First party/ management filed Vakalatnama of Shri

S.P. Chinchwadkar. Second party workman remained absent though served with notice. Thereafter the matter was

adjourned on several occasions for filing Statement of Claim by workman. Neither second party/ workman appeared

before this Tribunal nor filed his statement of claim. Without Statement of claim, the Reference cannot be decided on

merits and the same deserves to be dismissed. Thus I pass the following order:

ORDER

Reference stands dismissed for want of prosecution.

Date: 13.07.2016

M. V. DESHPANDE, Presiding Officer/Judge

ubZ fnYyh] 10 vxLr] 2016

dk-vk- 1734-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj us'kuy

fjlpZ lsaVj iQkWj iksehxzkaV ,aM vnlZ ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkj ds chp vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 20] [email protected] 29] 1938

3883

dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;&2] eaqcbZ ds iapkV (lnHkZ la- lhthvkbZVh&2@68 vkWiQ 2014) dks izdkf'kr

djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 10-08-2016 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&42012@67@2014&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)]

Ikh- ds- os.kqxksiky] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 10th August, 2016

S.O. 1734.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (I.D. Reference No. CGIT-2/68 of 2014) of the Central Government

Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 2, Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between

the employers in relation to the management of the National Research Centre for Pomegranate & others and their

workman, which was received by the Central Government on 10.08.2016.

[No. L-42012/67/2014-IR (DU)]

P. K. VENUGOPAL, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.2, MUMBAI

PRESENT :

M. V. DESHPANDE, Presiding Officer

REFERENCE NO. CGIT-2/68 of 2014

EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF

(1)

NATIONAL RESEARCH CENTRE FOR POMEGRANATE

The Director

National Research Centre for Pomegranate

Near Solapur University

Solapur (MS).

(2)

M/s. SWADESHI SECURITIES

M/s. Swadeshi Securities

96, Salgar Vasti

Dongaon Road

Solapur (MS).

AND

THEIR WORKMAN

Smt. Bhamabai B. Landge

A/o. Kedgaon

Tal. North Solapur

Maharashtra 413 002

APPEARANCES:

FOR THE EMPLOYER

Mr. S. P. Chinchwadkar, Advocate

FOR THE WORKMAN

No appearance

Mumbai, dated the 13^th July, 2016

AWARD

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment by its Order No.L-42012/67/2014-IR (DU),

dated 24.07.2014 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2 (A) of Section

10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 have referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

“Whether the demand of the workman Smt. Bhamabai B. Landge for asking regulation as an employee of

National Research Centre for Pomegranate, Solapur is legal and justified? If yes to what relief the workman is

entitled to?”

3884

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 20, 2016/SRAVANA 29, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

After receipt of the Reference, notices were issued to both the parties. Acknowledgement of notice served on

the second party Workman is at Ex-5. First party/ management filed Vakalatnama of Shri S.P. Chinchwadkar. Second

party workman remained absent though served with notice. Thereafter the matter was adjourned on several occasions

for filing Statement of Claim by workman. Neither second party/ workman appeared before this Tribunal nor filed her

statement of claim. Without Statement of claim, the Reference cannot be decided on merits and the same deserves to

be dismissed. Thus I pass the following order:

ORDER

Reference stands dismissed for want of prosecution.

Date: 13.07.2016

M. V. DESHPANDE, Presiding Officer/Judge

ubZ fnYyh] 10 vxLr] 2016

dk-vk- 1735-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj us'kuy

fjlpZ lsaVj iQkWj iksehxzkaV ,aM vnlZ ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkj ds chp vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;&2] eaqcbZ ds iapkV (lnHkZ la- lhthvkbZVh 2@74 vkWiQ 2014) dks izdkf'kr djrh

gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 10-08-2016 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&42012@73@2014&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)]

Ikh- ds- os.kqxksiky] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 10th August, 2016

S.O. 1735.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (I.D. Reference No. CGITA 2/74 of 2014) of the Central Government

Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 2, Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between

the employers in relation to the management of the National Research Centre for Pomegranate & others and their

workman, which was received by the Central Government on 10.08.2016.

[No. L-42012/73/2014-IR (DU)]

P. K. VENUGOPAL, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.2, MUMBAI

PRESENT :

M. V. DESHPANDE, Presiding Officer

REFERENCE NO. CGIT-2/74 of 2014

EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF

(1)

NATIONAL RESEARCH CENTRE FOR POMEGRANATE

The Director

National Research Centre for Pomegranate

Near Solapur University

Solapur (MS).

(2)

M/s. SWADESHI SECURITIES

M/s. Swadeshi Securities

96, Salgar Vasti

Dongaon Road

Solapur (MS).

AND

THEIR WORKMAN

Smt. Nanda Kisan Dhawane

Shivajinagar, Bale

Tal. North Solapur

Maharashtra 413 001

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 20] [email protected] 29] 1938

3885

APPEARANCES:

FOR THE EMPLOYER

Mr. S. P. Chinchwadkar, Advocate

FOR THE WORKMAN

No appearance

Mumbai, dated the 13^th July, 2016

AWARD

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment by its Order No.L-42012/73/2014-IR (DU),

dated 25.07.2014 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2 (A) of Section

10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 have referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

“Whether the demand of the workman Smt. Nanda Kisan Dhawane for asking regulation as an employee of

National Research Centre for Pomegranate, Solapur is legal and justified? If yes to what relief the workman is

entitled to?”

After receipt of the Order of Reference, notices were issued to both the parties. Acknowledgement of notice

served on the second party Workman is at Ex-5. First party/ management filed Vakalatnama of Shri S.P.

Chinchwadkar. Second party workman remained absent though served with notice. Thereafter the matter was

adjourned on several occasions for filing Statement of Claim by workman. Neither second party/ workman appeared

before this Tribunal nor filed her statement of claim. Without Statement of claim, the Reference cannot be decided on

merits and the same deserves to be dismissed. Thus I pass the following order:

ORDER

Reference stands dismissed for want of prosecution.

Date: 13.07.2016

M. V. DESHPANDE, Presiding Officer/Judge

ubZ fnYyh] 10 vxLr] 2016

dk-vk- 1736-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj us'kuy

fjlpZ lsaVj iQkWj iksehxzkaV ,aM vnlZ ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkj ds chp vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;&2] eaqcbZ ds iapkV (lnHkZ la- lhthvkbZVh 2@76 vkWiQ 2014) dks izdkf'kr djrh

gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 10-08-2016 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&42012@75@2014&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)]

Ikh- ds- os.kqxksiky] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 10th August, 2016

S.O. 1736.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (I.D. Reference No. CGITA 2/76 of 2014) of the Central Government

Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 2, Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between

the employers in relation to the management of the National Research Centre for Pomegranate & others and their

workman, which was received by the Central Government on 10.08.2016.

[No. L-42012/75/2014-IR (DU)]

P. K. VENUGOPAL, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.2, MUMBAI

PRESENT :

M. V. DESHPANDE, Presiding Officer

REFERENCE NO. CGIT-2/76 of 2014

EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF

(1)

NATIONAL RESEARCH CENTRE FOR POMEGRANATE

The Director

National Research Centre for Pomegranate

Near Solapur University

Solapur (MS).

3886

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 20, 2016/SRAVANA 29, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(2)

M/s. SWADESHI SECURITIES

M/s. Swadeshi Securities

96, Salgar Vasti

Dongaon Road

Solapur (MS).

AND

THEIR WORKMAN

Shri Bhikaji Saimbhaji Waghmare

R/o Kondi

Tal. North Solapur

Maharashtra 413 001

APPEARANCES:

FOR THE EMPLOYER

Mr. S. P. Chinchwadkar, Advocate

FOR THE WORKMAN

No appearance

Mumbai, dated the 13^th July, 2016

AWARD

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment by its Order No.L-42012/75/2014-IR (DU),

dated 25.07.2014 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2 (A) of Section

10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 have referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

“Whether the demand of the workman Shri Bhikaji Saimbhaji Waghmare for asking regulation as an

employee of National Research Centre for Pomegranate, Solapur is legal and justified? If yes to what relief

the workman is entitled to?”

After receipt of the Reference, notices were served on the parties. On the first date of hearing, second party/

Workman filed Vakalatnama of Shri V.R. Deshpande and sought adjournment for filing Statement of Claim. First

party/ management filed Vakalatnama of Shri S.P. Chinchwadkar. Thereafter the matter was adjourned on several

occasions for filing Statement of Claim by workman. Neither second party/ workman appeared before this Tribunal

nor filed his statement of claim. Without Statement of claim, the Reference cannot be decided on merits and the same

deserves to be dismissed. Thus I pass the following order:

ORDER

Reference stands dismissed for want of prosecution.

Date: 13.07.2016

M. V. DESHPANDE, Presiding Officer/Judge

ubZ fnYyh] 10 vxLr] 2016

dk-vk- 1737-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj us'kuy

fjlpZ lsaVj iQkWj iksehxzkaV ,aM vnlZ ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkj ds chp vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;&2] eaqcbZ ds iapkV (lnHkZ la- lhthvkbZVh 2@78 vkWiQ 2014) dks izdkf'kr djrh

gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 10-08-2016 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&42012@77@2014&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)]

Ikh- ds- os.kqxksiky] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 10th August, 2016

S.O. 1737.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (I.D. Reference No. CGITA 2/78 of 2014) of the Central Government

Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 2, Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between

the employers in relation to the management of the National Research Centre for Pomegranate & others and their

workman, which was received by the Central Government on 10.08.2016.

[No. L-42012/77/2014-IR (DU)]

P. K. VENUGOPAL, Desk Officer

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 20] [email protected] 29] 1938

3887

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.2, MUMBAI

PRESENT :

M. V. DESHPANDE, Presiding Officer

REFERENCE NO. CGIT-2/78 of 2014

EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF

(1)

NATIONAL RESEARCH CENTRE FOR POMEGRANATE

The Director

National Research Centre for Pomegranate

Near Solapur University

Solapur (MS).

(2)

M/s. SWADESHI SECURITIES

M/s. Swadeshi Securities

96, Salgar Vasti

Dongaon Road

Solapur (MS).

AND

THEIR WORKMAN

Smt. Janabai Navnath Survase

R/o House No. 184

Khadak Galli, Bale

Tal. North Solapur

Maharashtra State

APPEARANCES:

FOR THE EMPLOYER

Mr. S. P. Chinchwadkar, Advocate

FOR THE WORKMAN

No appearance

Mumbai, dated the 13^th July, 2016

AWARD

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment by its Order No.L-42012/77/2014-IR (DU),

dated 25.07.2014 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2 (A) of Section

10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 have referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

“Whether the demand of the workman Smt. Janabai Navnath Survase for asking regulation as an employee of

National Research Centre for Pomegranate, Solapur is legal and justified? If yes to what relief the workman is

entitled to?”

After receipt of the Reference, notices were issued to both the parties. Acknowledgement of notice served on

the second party Workman is at Ex-5. First party/ management filed Vakalatnama of Shri S.P. Chinchwadkar. Second

party workman remained absent though served with notice. Thereafter the matter was adjourned on several occasions

for filing Statement of Claim by workman. Neither second party/ workman appeared before this Tribunal nor filed her

statement of claim. Without Statement of claim, the Reference cannot be decided on merits and the same deserves to

be dismissed. Thus I pass the following order:

ORDER

Reference stands dismissed for want of prosecution.

Date: 13.07.2016

M. V. DESHPANDE, Presiding Officer/Judge

ubZ fnYyh] 10 vxLr] 2016

dk-vk- 1738-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj us'kuy

fjlpZ lsaVj iQkWj iksehxzkaV ,aM vnlZ ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkj ds chp vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

3888

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 20, 2016/SRAVANA 29, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;&2] eaqcbZ ds iapkV (lnHkZ la- lhthvkbZVh 2@80 vkWiQ 2014) dks izdkf'kr djrh

gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 10-08-2016 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&42012@79@2014&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)]

Ikh- ds- os.kqxksiky] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 10th August, 2016

S.O. 1738.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (I.D. Reference No. CGITA 2/80 of 2014) of the Central Government

Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 2, Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between

the employers in relation to the management of the National Research Centre for Pomegranate & others and their

workman, which was received by the Central Government on 10.08.2016.

[No. L-42012/79/2014-IR (DU)]

P. K. VENUGOPAL, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.2, MUMBAI

PRESENT : M. V. DESHPANDE, Presiding Officer

REFERENCE NO. CGIT-2/80 of 2014

EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF

(1)

NATIONAL RESEARCH CENTRE FOR POMEGRANATE

The Director

National Research Centre for Pomegranate

Near Solapur University

Solapur (MS).

(2)

M/s. SWADESHI SECURITIES

M/s. Swadeshi Securities

96, Salgar Vasti

Dongaon Road

Solapur (MS).

AND

THEIR WORKMAN

Smt. Vithabai S. Waghmode

Jai Malhar Nagar, Bale

Tal. North Solapur

Maharashtra-413 001

APPEARANCES:

FOR THE EMPLOYER

Mr. S. P. Chinchwadkar, Advocate

FOR THE WORKMAN

No appearance

Mumbai, dated the 13^th July, 2016

AWARD

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment by its Order No.L-42012/79/2014-IR (DU),

dated 25.07.2014 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2 (A) of Section

10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 have referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

“Whether the demand of the workman Smt. Vithabai S. Waghmode for asking regulation as an employee of

National Research Centre for Pomegranate, Solapur is legal and justified? If yes to what relief the workman is

entitled to?”

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 20] [email protected] 29] 1938

3889

After receipt of the Reference, notices were issued to both the parties. Acknowledgement of notice served on

the second party Workman is at Ex-5. First party/ management filed Vakalatnama of Shri S.P. Chinchwadkar. Second

party workman remained absent though served with notice. Thereafter the matter was adjourned on several occasions

for filing Statement of Claim by workman. Neither Second party/ workman appeared before this Tribunal nor filed her

statement of claim. Without Statement of claim, the Reference cannot be decided on merits and the same deserves to

be dismissed. Thus I pass the following order:

ORDER

Reference stands dismissed for want of prosecution.

Date: 13.07.2016

M. V. DESHPANDE, Presiding Officer/Judge

ubZ fnYyh] 11 vxLr] 2016

dk-vk- 1739-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj dsujk cSad

ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa ¯izfliy Je U;k;ky;] cSaxyq# ds

iapkV (lanHkZ la- 47@2014) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 11-08-2016 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&12012@37@2010&vkbZvkj (ch&II)]

jfo dqekj] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 11th August, 2016

S.O. 1739.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 47/2014) of the Principal Labour Court, Bengaluru as shown in the

Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Canara Bank and their workmen, received by the

Central Government on 11.08.2016.

[No. L-12012/37/2010-IR (B-II)]

RAVI KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, PRINCIPAL LABOUR COURT, BENGALURU; AT; BENGALURU

DATED:- THIS THE 18^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2016

I/c. PRESIDING OFFICER

N. S. MAMADAPUR LLM

DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

REFERENCE. NO:- 47 OF 2014

BETWEEN:

Sri K.Nagaraj D.

No.75, Mathrashree Nilaya,

2^nd cross, Jnanajyothi Nagara,

Jnanabharathi post,

Bangalore-560 056

…FIRST PARTY

(BY SRI C.R. PATIL, ADVOCATE)

VERSUS

The Chairman,

M/s. Canara Bank,

Head Office J.C.Road,

Bangalore-560 002.

The Deputy General Manager,

Canara Bank, D.A.Cell,

Circle Office, IMA House,

Baillappanavaranagara,

Hubli-29

…SECOND PARTY

(BY SRI T.P. MUTHANNA, ADVOCATE)

3890

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 20, 2016/SRAVANA 29, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

AWARD

Initially the matter was referred by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour to the Central Government

Industrial Tribunal and Labour Court, Bangalore on 20.09.2010 by framing the Schedule as under and directed the

CGIT to dispose of the matter within three months:

Whether the punishment of dismissal imposed to Shri K.Nagaraj by the management of M/s. Canara

Bank is just and proportionate to the misconduct proved in the enquiry? If not, to what relief the applicant

is entitled for?

Subsequently on 01.03.2012 forwarded a corrigendum by making partial modification in the schedule as

under:

“Whether the action of the management of Canara Bank in imposing the punishment of “Dismissal without

notice” upon Shri K.Nagaraj, Ex-Clerk vide Order dated 21/05/2008 is legal & justified? What relief is the

concerned workman entitled to?”

Thereafter as per the order dtd. : 26.09.2014 the Central Government by exercising the powers conferred by

clause (d) of Sub-Section (1) and sub-Section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 referred the matter

to this Court to adjudicate the matter and to pass award in respect of the following Schedule:

“Whether the action of the management of Canara Bank in imposing the punishment of “Dismissal without

notice” upon Shri K.Nagaraj, Ex-Clerk vide Order dated 21/05/2008 is legal & justified? What relief is the

concerned workman entitled to?”

02.

Sum and substance of the contention of the claim statement filed by the first party are that: The first party

having joined the second party No.1 Bank as clerk w.e.f, 30.05.1977 his services came to be confirmed after

completion of probationary period. He served the bank in different branches as clerk. He rendered 33 years of service

to the entire satisfaction of his official superiors and maintained unblemished service records regarding which he has

been issued with number of appreciations in respect of mobilisation of deposits, recovery, obtaining AOD’s and image

building activities of the Bank. When he was working at Kannur Branch, he was transferred and posted to work at

Hiriyur Branch, Chithradurga District w.e.f., April, 2004. Disciplinary proceedings were initiated against him on the

basis of the unsigned charge sheet dtd. : 23.5.2007 by appointing the Enquiry Officer. The enquiry so conducted on the

basis of the unsigned charge sheet is totally without authority and as such, enquiry findings holding the charges proved

are also without authority and illegal. So also the order of termination dtd. : 02.06.2008.

03.

Further during the enquiry, the Enquiry Officer did not afford opportunity to the delinquent official to appear

before him and by placing him ex-parte, in his absence, proceeded with the case one sided and passed the order which

is illegal and without following the principles of natural justice. His request to appoint another Enquiry Officer for

conducting the enquiry has been turned down.

04.

In the earlier charge dtd. :17.12.1988 in respect of a cheque he was exonerated from the alleged charges. The

said fact was not considered in the enquiry conducted against him in the subsequent enquiry. All the allegations made

against him in the unsigned charge sheet were not proved by producing relevant documents and by examining the

material witnesses, which was also informed vide appeal submitted to the appellate authority by the first party and the

appellate authority also did not consider the said fact and without verifying the file and records confirmed the enquiry

findings and dismissed the appeal. In spite of the directions by the disciplinary authority to allow the first party to

attend pre promotion training for the purpose of promotion and to appear for the promotion examination dtd. :

10.02.2007, the branch manager refused permission to him to join the duty after completion of the training which

amounts of miscarriage of justice. The order of dismissal is illegal as the same is passed in contravention of Section

33(2)(b) of I.D.Act. As he has crossed the age of super annuation on 08.07.2010, he is entitled for all the consequential

monitory benefits instead of reinstatement and also entitle for full back wages w.e.f., 02.06.2008 to 08.07.2010 and

thereafter full pension with allowances along with interest till the date of payment.

05.

Subsequently the first party also filed additional claim statement wherein he has taken contentions regarding

conducting the domestic enquiry by the disciplinary authority without following the procedure and without complying

the conditions stipulated and also with regard to the irregularities occurred during the enquiry in respect of each

allegation i.e., 5 charges and prayed to hold that the second party bank is not justified in dismissing the first party from

service.

06.

Further he has also filed statement of rejoinder to the counter statement of the second party wherein he has

denied the contentions of the second party bank with regard to brining to the notice of the second party bank in respect

of unsigned charge sheet, affording sufficient opportunity to him to participate in the enquiry, appointing the Enquiry

Officer and submitted that in spite of number of representations for full salary after completion of one year of the

suspension period went in vain and the enquiry is not completed in time despite providing time Schedule and delay in

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 20] [email protected] 29] 1938

3891

disposal of disciplinary case is a matter of serious concern and justice delayed is justice denied. Further on 19.07.2013

the first party filed the amended claim statement wherein the above said facts are reiterated.

07.

On service of notice, the second party appeared before the Court and filed the counter statement contending

that K.Nagaraj working as clerk at Hiriyur Branch since 08.08.2004 has committed several misconducts for which he

was issued with the charge sheet Ref. No. HUBCO:DAC-48:CHW:02:2007 dtd. : 23.5.2007 and he was kept under

suspension on the allegation that when he was working at Hiriyur Branch intentionally has issued no due confirmation

from Canara Bank Hiriyur Branch to Vijaya Bank in respect of one Mr.Narasimhaiah of Alur village a customer of the

second party bank, a complaint received from one Mr.Murugesh, H.S.Venkatesh SB account holders of Hiriyur Branch

that the first party has taken a loan from them by giving cheques to them, but failed to refund the said amount, a cheque

for Rs.15,000/- drawn on SBI Davanagere discounted by the first party under ECDB 50.2006 was returned for the

reasons insufficient funds and cheques issued by him were dishonoured for want of sufficient funds in his account and

in spite of instructions to surrender all the unused cheque leaves and the Can Card, he failed to return the same, the

slogans and statements made in the Ugadi greetings in his personal name using Bank’s logo do not form the

official/accepted propriety of the Banks, the proceeds of cheque bearing No.73879 dtd. : 3.5.2005 drawn by Jala

Samnvaya Yojanadhikarigala Sangha, Chithradurga was credited twice to two different accounts due to the

involvement of the first party by colluding with Smt. Mallika, student trainee. In respect of the said acts domestic

enquiry was conducted according to the regulations of the Bank by affording all the reasonable opportunities to the first

party to defend himself and the Enquiry Officer submitted his findings dtd. : 26.02.2008 and thereafter, the same was

brought to the notice of the first party and after considering the submissions made by him, evidence on record,

circumstances in the case and gravity of the misconduct, the punishment of dismissal without notice was imposed on

21.5.2008. Against the said punishment order, he preferred an appeal before the appellate authority which in turn after

considering the documents on record, found no reasons to interfere either with the order of dismissal or with the

findings of the Enquiry Officer. There is no illegality in the enquiry proceedings. The misconduct committed by the

first party is grave. Further by denying the entire pleadings of the claim statement contended that the same are nothing

but a clear after though.

08.

Further with regard to the contentions raised by the first party in his additional claim statement, denied the

same and further in respect of the amended counter statement contended that while working as clerk at Hiriyur branch

of the bank he has committed several misconducts for which he was issued with a charge sheet and during the enquiry,

the same were came to be proved and accordingly, he was terminated from service. Further this Court as per the

orders dtd. : 21.09.2012 has decided the preliminary issue with regard to domestic enquiry conducted against the first

party as fair and proper. Hence, the first party is not entitled for any relief sought for and accordingly prayed to dismiss

the case with exemplary costs.

09.

The issue referred by the Central Government is as under:

“Whether the action of the management of Canara Bank in imposing the punishment of “Dismissal without

notice” upon Shri K.Nagaraj, Ex-Clerk vide Order dated 21/05/2008 is legal & justified? What relief is the

concerned workman entitled to?”

10.

To prove the preliminary issue the first party got himself examined as WW.1 and got marked Ext. W1 to W33

and closed his side. The second party bank examined its Sr. Manager as M.W.1 and got marked Ext. M1 to M108 and

closed his side and the CGIT., by its order dtd. : 21.09.2012 recorded its findings on preliminary issue i.e., fairness of

the domestic enquiry held against the first party as fair and proper.

11.

The first party in order to prove the victimisation got examined himself as WW.1 and got marked Ext. W34 to

W46 and closed his side. The second party bank got examined one Chandrashekhar Adiga as M.W.2 on victimisation

and got marked Ext. M109 to 110 and closed his side.

12.

Heard the arguments.

13.

My findings to the above points as stated in the reference order are as under:

REFERENCE NO.1: In the AFFIRMATIVE for the following :

REASONS

14.

REFERENCE POINT NO.1: Before considering the reference referred by the Government of India and also

before considering the facts of this case to give findings on the reference point, it is necessary to mention herein the

reasons for transferring this dispute from the Central Government Industrial Dispute Tribual, Bengaluru to this Court.

15.

The first party was working in Canara Bank, thereafter Canara Bank issued charge sheet on 23.5.2007 alleging

some serious misconducts mentioned in the charge sheet, departmental enquiry is held and thereafter based on

departmental enquiry report, he was dismissed from service. He has raised industrial dispute and the matter was

3892

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 20, 2016/SRAVANA 29, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

referred to the CGIT., Bengaluru for adjudication on 20.09.2010. The CGIT has framed preliminary issue in regard to

fairness of the domestic enquiry and after recording the evidence and after hearing both sides, passed the order dtd. :

21.09.2012 and held that the domestic enquiry conducted by the second party against the first party is fair and proper.

Thereafter the first party has filed application for interim relief and the same was rejected by the CGIT., Bengaluru. He

has approached the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka wherein also his writ petition was dismissed. In the meanwhile,

the first party has approached the Government of India by submitting the representation that the Presiding Officer of

CGIT., is biased against him. Thereafter concerned Ministry, after taking the remarks from the Presiding Officer of

CGIT., Bengaluru referred this Industrial Dispute to this Court.

16.

Now this Court has to give its finding on the reference made by the Government of India ie., “Whether the

action of the management of Canara Bank in imposing the punishment of “Dismissal without notice” upon Shri

K.Nagaraj, Ex-Clerk vide Order dated 21/05/2008 is legal & justified? What relief is the concerned workman entitled

to?”

17.

Besides this the first party has also raised specific plea that the order of his dismissal passed by the second

party management is in contravention of the provisions of Sec.33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947. He has

also raised another dispute that subsistence allowance is not paid to him.

18.

With regard to dismissal order passed by second party management without notice to the first party K.Nagaraj,

I have examined the records produced by the second party management. After conclusion of the enquiry, the Enquiry

Officer has submitted his report dtd. : 26.2.2008 to the management. The report of Enquiry Officer is marked as Ext.

M-99. Records further reveal that as per Ext. M100 the management vide its letter dtd. : 29.02. 2008 has forwarded the

enquiry report to the first party Nagaraj wherein the Nagaraj has endorsed his acknowledgement mentioning as

“Received by registered A.D., through Hiriyur Branch on 6.3.2008.”. Ext. M101 is the letter submitted by the first

party K.Nagaraj on 23.3.2008 with reference to the findings given by the Enquiry Officer. Again the second party

management issued a letter as per Ext. M102. It is a letter dtd. : 22.4.2008 wherein the second party management has

specifically stated that they have received the submissions made by the first party Nagaraj on the findings of the

Enquiry Officer.

19.

Further the management has analysed all the relevant records, submissions made by the first party and also the

findings given by the Enquiry Officer and in the said letter it is specifically mentioned that considering the facts and

circumstances of the case and gravity of the misconduct, they have decided to impose punishment of “Dismissal

without Notice” as envisaged under Chapter XI Regulation 4 clause (a) of the Canara Bank Service Code. Before this

personal hearing was accorded to him on 03.05.2008 at Canara Bank, Circle Office, I.M.A. House, B.N.nagara, Hubli-

29 at 11.00 am., Ext. M-103 demonstrates that as per notice issued for personal hearing, the proceedings of the

personal hearing took place on 03.05.2008 in the date, time and place mentioned in Ext. M102. The first party

K.Nagaraj appeared on 3.5.2008 before the disciplinary authority and answered that he received the letter issued by the

Bank on 22.4.2008 and an opportunity of being heard was given to him on the punishment and he has categorically

stated that he is submitting the letter dtd. : 3.5.2008 and requested to consider the same. Ext. M103 is the personal

hearing proceedings took place before the disciplinary authority at Hubli. Ext. M104 is the written letter submitted by

the first party and again he has raised the contention that the charge-sheet was not signed by any officer or competent

authority and the enquiry conducted against him is illegal and the Enquiry Officer was biased against him from the

beginning. Therefore, he has requested once again to reconsider the proposed punishment by reviewing the entire case

and exonerate him from the allegations.

20.

In Canara Bank disciplinary action against award staff is initiated as per the provisions of Canara Bank

Service Code. Chapter XI of Canara Bank Services Code deals with initiation of disciplinary proceedings against award

staff and procedure thereon. Chapter XI Rule 3 describes the acts and omissions on the part of an employee coming

under the definition of “gross misconduct”. Further Chapter XI Rule 4(a) of Canara Bank Services Code provides for

“dismissal without notice” for an employee found guilty of gross misconduct. The charge proved against the present

first party comes under the definition of “gross misconduct”. The dismissal order also discloses that dismissal without

not notice is for gross misconduct. Ext. M-105 is the proceedings of the Deputy General Manager in regard to dismissal

without notice. In the proceedings the disciplinary authority has considered the representation made by the first party

and also considered the gravity of the misconduct for imposition of punishment of dismissal without notice and came to

the conclusion that the dismissal without notice is just and proper. Accordingly the dismissal order is passed on

21.5.2008. So, on perusal of all the records, I am of the view that there is no error committed by the second party

management in dismissing the first party without notice. The second party management has referred the provisions

under which the order of dismissal without notice was passed. They have invoked the provisions of Chapter XI

Regulation 4 Clause (a) of Canara Bank Service Code. By giving cogent reasons and considering the gravity of

misconduct the order was passed. Further the suspension period was treated as one spent on duty. Therefore, I am of

the definite view that the dismissal order passed by the management without notice is in accordance with law.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 20] [email protected] 29] 1938

3893

21.

The first party has raised specific plea that the second party management has not complied the provisions of

Sec.33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act. Sec.33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act refers only when if during the

pendency of any such proceedings in respect of any industrial dispute, the employer may, in accordance with the

standing orders applicable to a workman cannot pass a dismissal or discharge order for any misconduct not connected

with the dispute. The law mandates that if any order has to be passed for dismissal of a workman during the pendency

of any such proceedings, the workman shall be discharged or dismissed only by paying wage for one month and an

application has to be made by the employer to the authority before which, the proceedings is pending, for approval of

the action taken by the employer. The first party has to prove that at the time of passing of the dismissal order dtd. :

21.5.2008, proceedings were pending before any competent authority with reference to Industrial dispute.

22.

It is the case of the first party that the management did not obtain permission to get the approval order of

dismissal from the competent authority as provided under Sec.33(2)(b) of the Industrial Dispute Act. In this regard he

relied on Ext. W44 wherein the Deputy General Manager Canara Bank, Circle Office, Hubli in his reply submitted to

the Asst, Labour Commissioner, Hubli dtd. : 16.7.2008 has admitted and mentioned about the dispute raised by the first

party on 14.3.2008 on the file of the Addl.Labour Commissioner, Hubli.

23.

Further he has also relied on the provisions of Sec.20(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act and contended that the

proceedings come to effect from the date of receipt of representation by the competent authority. On perusal of

Sec.20(a) of the Industrial Disputes Act it refers to the commencement and conclusion of the proceedings. Sec.20(1)

specifies that a conciliation proceeding shall be deemed to have commenced on the date on which, the notice of strike

or lockout U/Sec.22 is received by the conciliation officer or on the date of the order referring the dispute to a Board as

the case may be. In the present case the first party has not raised any dispute with regard to strike or lockout. He

himself has admitted that he had made representation before the conciliation officer for non-payment of full salary

w.e.f., 16.12.2007. He had submitted his representation on 14.3.2008. Hence, he pleads that Sec.33(2)(b) of the

Industrial Disputes Act is applicable. But on perusal of all the records, records reveal that the termination order is

passed by the second party management on 21.5.2008. Records further reveal that notice from the Asst.Labour

Commissioner(Central), No.362A/362B/6, (Lejoy Dental Clinic Compound, Jusugal Road, Keshwapur, Hubli-20,

bearing No. 50(4) 2008-A/H dtd. : 3.6.2008 calling for payments on representation submitted by the first party was

received by the second party on 9.6.2008 to submit their comments on or before 20.6.2008. So as on the date of

dismissal order dtd. : 21.05.2008 the second party management was not having the knowledge about the representation

made by the first party dtd. : 14.3.2008. There was no impediment for the first party to submit his representation to the

second party management stating that he has already raised a dispute regarding non-payment of full salary before the

Asst.Labour Commissioner by filing representation dtd. : 14.3.2008. This Court has already observed that before

passing the dismissal order without notice, personal hearing was given to the first party. Ext. - clearly demonstrates

that the first party appeared before the disciplinary authority on 3.5.2008 and an opportunity of personal hearing was

given to him. On that day he had submitted the written representation to the second party management which is

marked as Ext. M104. On perusal of the contents of Ext. M104 the written statement made by the first party dtd. :

3.5.2008 no where he has mentioned that he had made representation to the Asst. Labour Commissioner on 14.3.2008

by raising an industrial dispute for non-payment of full salary and conciliation proceedings are pending. The conduct

of the first party clearly demonstrates that he is not fair in regard to submission of his representation before the Asst.

labour Commissioner dtd. : 14.3.2008 which was not brought to the notice of the second party management neither at

the time of personal hearing nor after furnishing the findings of the Enquiry Officer. So the contentions raised by the

first party in regard to contravention of Sec.33(2)(b) of Industrial Disputes Act 1947 is not sustainable.

24.

Further records clearly indicate that the first party has filed an interim application for grant of interim relief

before the CGIT., pending adjudication of dispute, which was rejected. Against the said rejection order the first party

has filed W.P.No.50093/2013 (L-TER) before the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka. The Hon'ble High Court of

Karnataka after hearing the parties dismissed the writ petition on the ground that the first party has filed the application

in CR.No.38/2010 for interim relief which was rejected on the ground that the reference was received on 27.9.2010 on

which date, the first party has attained the superannuation and therefore, the interim relief cannot be granted. Against

the said order of the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka, the first party has not approached the higher courts either by

way of writ appeal or in the form of SLP., So, the plea raised by the first party regarding non-payment of full salary

etc., cannot be considered.

25.

I have examined the decisions relied by the learned advocate for the first party and also his written argument

with reference to the contravention of the provisions of Sec.33(2)(b) of Industrial Disputes Act 1947. The preposition

of law laid down in these decisions cannot be disputed. At the same time, the law mandates that Sec.33(2)(b) of the

Industrial Disputes is applicable only when any proceedings are pending before the competent authority. Admittedly

the first party has failed to prove that as on the date of dismissal order, there were any proceedings before the

competent authority and ignoring the same, dismissal order is passed. Accordingly I give my findings on Reference

point no.1 in the AFFIRMATIVE and In view of the forgoing reasons, legal propositions and discussions made above;

I proceed to pass the following:

3894

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 20, 2016/SRAVANA 29, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ORDER

The Reference under section 10(1)(d) of the Industrial Disputes Act is rejected.

Send copy of this Award to the Government for publication.

The Government is directed to publish the award in such manner, as it thinks fit within a period of 30 days from

the date of receipt of the same.

The award shall become enforceable on the expiry of 30 days from the date of its publication Under Section 17

of the I.D. Act. 1947.

The Government is directed to intimate the publication of award to all the parties to the case by registered post

acknowledgement due, without fail.

(Dictated to the Judgment Writer, computerised by her, corrected and then signed by me on this the 18^th DAY OF

JUNE, 2016).

N. S. MAMADAPUR, District Judge I/C Presiding Officer

ANNEXURE

WITNESSES EXAMINED FOR I PARTY:

WW1: K.Nagaraja (on Domestic Enquiry) 19.8.2011/9.9.2011/ 27.9.2011.

WW1: K.Nagaraja (On victimization) 1.10.2012/4.6.2013/29.1.2014

DOCUMENTS GOT MARKED FOR I PARTY :

Ext. W.1

Suspension order dtd. : 4.11.2006

Ext. W.2

Xerox copy of Enquiry proceedings dtd. :071.7.2007

Ext. W.3

Xerox copy of enquiry proceedings dtd. :31.07.2007

Ext. W.4

Certified copy of telegram receipt

Ext. W.5

Certified copy of telegram receipt

Ext. W.6

Certified copy of the delivery of telegram dtd. : 17.4.2007

Ext. W.7

Xerox copy of hand book on disciplinary matters

Ext. W.8

Representation by B.M.Madhava dtd. : 8.8.2007

Ext. W.9

Representation by first party dtd. : 9.8.2007

Ext. W.10

Letter by 2^nd party dtd. : 21.08.2007

Ext. W.11

Enquiry proceedings dtd. : 21.8.2007

Ext. W.12

Enquiry proceedings dtd. : 9.10.2007

Ext. W.13

Representation dtd. : 10.10.2007 with courier receipt

Ext. W.14

Letter dtd. : 16.11.2007 by Enquiry Officer to first party .

Ext. W.15

Representation by first party dtd. : 30.11.2007

Ext. W16

Letter dtd. : 24.12.2007 by Enquiry Officer.

Ext. W.17

Letter by second party dtd. : 21.11.2006 to first party and letter of first party .

Ext. W.18

Letter dtd. : 24.4.2006 by manager of second party to Senior Manager

Ext. W.19

Representation by first party dtd. : 15.2.2007

Ext. W.20

Representation by first party dtd. : 30.5.2006

Ext. W.21

Proceedings of deputy general manager dtd. : 21.5.2008 with enclosures

Ext. W.22

Proceedings of deputy general manager dtd. : 24.4.2009 and order of appellate authority.

Ext. W.23

Memo dtd. : 10.12.2010 by first party in C.R.38/2010

Ext. W.24

Certified copy of deposition of M.W.1 dtd. : 9.6.2011 in C.R.No.28/2010

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 20] [email protected] 29] 1938

3895

Ext. W.25

Certified copy of deposition of M.W.1 dtd. : 11.4.2011 in C.R.No.20/2009

Ext. W.26

Statement given by M.W.1 dtd. : 30-.5.2006

Ext. W.27

Charge sheet dtd. : 23.5.2007

Ext. W.28

RPAD postal receipt

Ext. W.29

Certified copy of telegram dtd. : 19.8.2007

Ext. W.30

Delivery of telegram letter issued by telegraph office

Ext. W.31

Telephone bill/receipt

Ext. W.32

Letter by second party to first party dtd. : 21.8.2007

Ext. W.33

Letter by Enquiry Officer dtd. : 24.12.2007

Ext. W.34

Representation given by first party dtd. :2.1.2008 along with courier receipt

Ext. W.35

Representation given by first party dtd. :19.1.2008 along with courier receipt

Ext. W.36

Representation given by first party dtd. :05.02.2008 along with courier receipt

Ext. W.37

Representation given by first party dtd. :23.2.2008 along with courier receipt

Ext. W.38

Two representations given by I party dtd. : 08.03.2008 along with courier receipts

Ext. W.39

Representation given by first party dtd. : 24.4.2008

Ext. W.40

Representation given by first party dtd. :13/5/08 along with courier receipt

Ext. W.41

Representation given by first party dtd. :26.5.2008 along with courier receipt

Ext. W42

Third party letter dtd. : 22./01.2008 along with circular

Ext. W43

Representation by first party dtd. :14.03.2008 along with acknowledgement

Ext. W44

Third party statement of reply A.L.C., Hubli, dtd. : 1.7.2008

Ext. W45

Third party letter dtd. : 2.6.2008 along with order of dismissal of first party .

Ext. W46

Notice given by A.L.C., to the third party dtd. : 3.6.2008.

WITNESSES EXAMINED FOR II Party:

M.W.1: R.Guruprasad (On domestic enquiry)

16.05.2011/9.6.11

M.W.2: Chandrashekhar Adiga (On victimization) 17.11.2015.

DOCUMENTS GOT MARKED FOR II PARTY

Ext. M.1

Suspension order Dtd. 4/11/2006

Ext. M.2

Charge sheet dtd. 23/05/2007

Ext. M.3

Appointment order of Enquiry Officer & Presenting Officer Dtd. 15/06/2007

Ext. M.4

Enquiry Notice Dtd. 25/06/2007

Ext. M.5

Enquiry proceedings Dtd. 07/07/2007

Ext. M.6

Enquiry Notice Dtd. 10/07/2007

Ext. M.7

Enquiry proceedings Dtd. 31/07/2007

Ext. M.8

Letter Dtd. 31/07/2007 by Enquiry Officer

Ext. M.9

Enquiry Notice Dtd. 1/08/2007

Ext. M.10

Enquiry proceedings Dtd. 21/08/2007

Ext. M.11

Enquiry proceedings Dtd. 22/08/2007

Ext. M.12

Enquiry proceedings Dtd. 23/08/2007

Ext. M.13

Enquiry proceedings Dtd. 08/10/2007

Ext. M.14

Enquiry proceedings Dtd. 09/10/2007

3896

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 20, 2016/SRAVANA 29, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Ext. M.15

Enquiry Notice Dtd. 16/11/2007

Ext. M.16

Enquiry proceedings Dtd. 12/01/2008

Ext. M.17

Enquiry proceedings Dtd. 14/01/2008

Ext. M.18

Statement by Mallik Dtd. 16/05/2006

Ext. M.19

Statement by Mallik Dtd. 30/05/2006

Ext. M.20

Joint Statement by V.R Murthy & S.P. Mishra Dtd. 29/05/06

Ext. M.21

Statement by Eranna Dtd. 5/06/2006

Ext. M.22

Statement by G.B. Nagaraju Dtd. 18/07/2006

Ext. M.23

Investigation Report Dtd. 1/06/2006

Ext. M.24

Supplemental investigation report

Ext. M.25

Debit slip dtd. 16/05/2005

Ext. M.26

Debit slip dtd. 16/05/2005

Ext. M.27

Cheque No 920681 dtd. 12/05/2005

Ext. M.28

Cheque No 920682 dtd. 17/05/2005

Ext. M.29

Cheque No 920684 dtd. 9/06/2005

Ext. M.30

Cheque no 920683 dtd. 27/05/2005

Ext. M.31

Bank Statement from 14/09/04 to 29/04/06 of Mallik

Ext. M.32

Supplemental inspection report dtd. 18/07/2006

Ext. M.33

O S C register page No 192

Ext. M.34

Bank statement of Muneer Ahmed

Ext. M.35

Statement dtd. 8/05/2006 by K.S Muralidhar

Ext. M.36

Statement dtd. 31/05/2006 by S.Chandra Mohan

Ext. M.37

Statement dtd. 8/05/2006 by T. Ramachandrappa

Ext. M.38

Statement dtd. 16/05/2006 by Muneer Ahmed

Ext. M.39

Mandatory report dtd. 17/05/2005

Ext. M.40

Payment details dtd. 6/06/2006

Ext. M.41

Attendance sheet for the month of May 2005

Ext. M.42

Statement dtd. 05/06/2006 by K.Nagaraju

Ext. M.43

Statement by Muneer Ahmed

Ext. M.44

Statement by Umesh

Ext. M.45

Statement by T.N Veeresh

Ext. M.46

Complaint by K. Murugesh dtd. 11/05/2006

Ext. M.47

Cheque No 393374 Dtd. 3/03/2006

Ext. M.48

Statement by Suresh.S. Shahapur dtd. 18/07/2006

Ext. M.49

Bank letter dtd. 18/04/2006

Ext. M.50

Vijaya Bank letter dtd. 18/04/2006

Ext. M.51

Reply letter dtd. 20/04/2006 to Vijaya Bank

Ext. M.52

No due Certificate Issued to Narashimhiah

Ext. M.53

Bank letter dtd. 30/05/2006

Ext. M.54

Letter dtd. 25/06/2006 by K.Nagaraja

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 20] [email protected] 29] 1938

3897

Ext. M.55

Bangalore Circle office letter dtd. 23/05/2006

Ext. M.56

Letter dtd. 17/06/2006

Ext. M.57

Letter dtd. 9/05/2006

Ext. M.58

Letter dtd. 14/04/2006

Ext. M.59

Letter dtd. 27/04/2006

Ext. M.60

Letter dtd. 18/07/2006 by K.Nagaraja

Ext. M.61

Letter dtd. 09/06/2006 by Nagaraja

Ext. M.62

Letter dtd. 3/06/2006

Ext. M.63

Letter dtd. 24/04/2006

Ext. M.64

Letter dtd. 26/04/2006

Ext. M.65

Letter dtd. 26/04/2006 to K.Nagaraja

Ext. M.66

Letter dtd. 11/08/2006

Ext. M.67

Letter dtd. 8/08/2006

Ext. M.68

Greetings by K.Nagaraja dtd. 30/03/2006

Ext. M.69

Greetings by K.Nagaraja dtd. 7/09/2005

Ext. M.70

Greetings by K.Nagaraja dtd. 19/11/2004

Ext. M.71

Greetings by K.Nagaraja dtd. 1/01/2005

Ext. M.72

Greetings by K.Nagaraja dtd. 26/01/2005

Ext. M.73

Greetings by K.Nagaraja dtd. 01/11/2005

Ext. M.74

Greetings by K.Nagaraja dtd. 3/10/2005

Ext. M.75

Letter dtd. 21/04/2006 by K.Nagaraja

Ext. M.76

Letter dtd. 29/05/2006 by K.Nagaraja

Ext. M.77

IBAR Quary dtd. 24/04/2006

Ext. M.78

Letter dtd. 28/04/2006

Ext. M.79

Cheque refused register page No 22

Ext. M.80

R.C Book of K.Nagaraja

Ext. M.81

Investigation report dtd. 7/06/2006

Ext. M.82

Attendance sheet for the month of Dec 2005

Ext. M.83

Statement of loan of M Narasimhiah No. 1703

Ext. M.84

Statement of loan of M Narasimhiah No 1575

Ext. M.85

Statement of loan of M Narasimhiah No 2183

Ext. M.86

Statement dtd. 30/05/2006 of K.Nagaraja

Ext. M.87

Statement by K.Nagaraja

Ext. M.88

Bank statement of Nagaraja A/C No. 22163

Ext. M.89

Bank statement of K.Nagaraja A/C No. 2236

Ext. M.90

Letter dtd. 27/04/2006 to K.Ramakrishna

Ext. M.91

Vijaya bank letter dtd. 12/01/2006

Ext. M.92

Letter dtd. 15/02/84

Ext. M.93

Letter dtd. 22/02/83

Ext. M.94

Cheque Book issue register page No. 164

3898

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 20, 2016/SRAVANA 29, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Ext. M.95

S.B A/C opening form of M.Muneer Ahmed

Ext. M.96

Attendance register extract for the month of Sep 2004

Ext. M.97

Brief submitted by Presenting Officer dtd. 24/01/2008

Ext. M.98

Written arguments filed by defence

Ext. M.99

Enquiry report and findings dtd. 26/02/2008

Ext. M.100

Letter dtd. 29/02/2008 along with enclosure to K.Nagaraja

Ext. M.101

Letter dtd. 23/03/2008 by K.Nagaraja

Ext. M.102

Letter dtd. 22/04/2008 about personal hearing

Ext. M.103

Personal hearing proceedings

Ext. M.104

Written submission dtd. 3/05/2008 by K.Nagaraja

Ext. M.105

Proceedings dtd. 21/05/2008 along with orders passed by Disciplinary Authority

Ext. M.106

Memorandum of appeal dtd. 13/06/2008

Ext. M.107

Letter dtd. 28/02/2009 to K.Nagaraja

Ext. M.108

Letter dtd. 7/05/2009 along with order passed by Appellate Authority

Ext. M.109

Letter dtd. 3/06/2008 by Asst. Labour Commissioner, Hubli

Ext. M.110

Letter dtd. 28/07/2008 by Asst. Labour Commissioner, Hubli.

ubZ fnYyh] 12 vxLr] 2016

dk-vk- 1740-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj ;wdks cSad

ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] jkmjdsyk ds iapkV ¹lanHkZ la- 34@97(lh)º dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 12-08-2016 dks

izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&12012@22@94&vkbZvkj (ch&II)]

jfo dqekj] MsLd vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 12th August, 2016

S.O. 1740.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award [Ref. No. 34/97(C)] of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Rourkela as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of UCO Bank

and their workmen, received by the Central Government on12.08.2016.

[No. L-12012/22/94-IR (B-II)]

RAVI KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

IN THE COURT OF THE PRESIDING OFFICER : INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL ROURKELA

Industrial Dispute Case No.34 /97 (C)

Dated, the 18^th December 2013

Present:

Sri S.K. Mohanty, Presiding Officer,

Industrial Tribunal, Rourkela.

Between:

The Branch Manager,

UCO Bank, Godvaga Branch

At: Goadvaga, Sambalpou

…I^st Party

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 20] [email protected] 29] 1938

3899

And

Sri Manabhajan Bhoi,

At:/PO : Goadvaga,

Dist: Sambalpur

…IInd party

Appearances :

For the I^st party

Sri P.S. Naik, Advocate

Sri S.S. Jena, Advocate

For the IInd party

Sri G. Pujhari , Advocate

AWARD

The Govt. of India in the Ministry of Labour in exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub Section

(1) of Sub Section (2A) of Section 10 of the I.D. act, 1947 have referred the following disputes for adjudication vide

no. L-12012/22/94-IR (B-II) dt.9.5.94 :

“Whether the action of the management of UCO Bank, Goadvaga District : Sambalpur in terminating the

services of Sri Manabhanjan Bhoi , Sub Staff with effect from 19.8 92 and not giving him the one –time

opportunity for absorption in terms of the Approach Paper circulated by the Ministry of Finance in 1990 is

justified ? If not, what relief is the said workman entitled to?”

The case of the 2^nd party workman is that he was appointed as an employee in Goadvaga branch of the UCO

bank with effect from 26.3.88 on daily wage basis and was working continuously from 26.3.88 to 19.8.92 when he was

refused employment. During his service period, he was doing the job of Daftari, cash Peon and other job assigned to

him from time to time and the job performed by him were similar with that of jobs performed by permanent employee

of the bank of his grade . His further case is that when the head office of UCO bank issued circular dt.19.10.89 to treat

all the daily rated workers who have completed 240 days of continuous service as regular employees of the bank, he

had submitted necessary application for his regularisation. But the branch Manager with ulterior motive had refused to

accept the same and without assigning any reason the Branch Manager had refused employment to him illegally with

effect from 19.8 92. So the workman had raised the industrial dispute which was taken up for consideration and the

same having ended in failure the dispute has been referred to this Tribunal by Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour for

adjudication with the aforesaid terms of the dispute. According to the workman since he has completed more than 240

days of continuous service in the bank, the refusal of his employment with effect from 19.8.92 amounts to

retrenchment. So he has prayed for his reinstatement with full back wages.

On the other hand the management of the bank in its written statement have submitted that there are 20

nationalised banks in the country with its branches. Some irregularities had crept up in the matter of engagement of sub

staff for which the trade union representing the workman of UCO bank and the management of the bank have

prompted a settlement on 12.10.89 for regularization of such casual/daily wage employee. There were several

eligibility criteria prescribed for such regularisation in the said settlement. According to the management as the

workman was engaged as a water boy to supply water to the staff and customers of the bank on daily wage basis, he did

not fulfill the eligibility criteria for absorption in the bank. Further the main duty of the workman was to supply

drinking water to the staff and customers of the bank during summer season and he has never worked as a subordinate

staff in the said branch of the UCO bank nor he has performed any of the duties required to be done by subordinate

staff. Moreover as per the norms of the settlement it has been specifically agreed that those who have been engaged as

water boys on daily wage would not be eligible for being considered for absorption under settlement. Therefore he

claim of the 2^nd party workman is not legal and justified and hence the reference may kindly be answered in their

favour.

On the above pleadings of the parties the following issues were framed:

Whether the reference is bad in law?

II:

Whether the action of the management of UCO Bank, Goadbhaga, Dist: Sambalpur in terminating the

services of Sri Manabhaojan Bhoi, Sub staff w.e.f 19.8.92 and not giving him one –time opportunity

for absorption in erms of the Approach Paper circulated by the Ministry of Finance in 1990 is

justified ?

III:

To what relief, if any, the 2^nd party workman is entitled?

3900

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 20, 2016/SRAVANA 29, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

In order to prove their case, the management has examined two witnesses in their favour as against one for the

2^nd party workman. Besides oral evidence the management has exhibited three documents as against 8 documents

from the side of the workman to substantiate its case.

Issue no. II:- In this issue the Tribunal has to decide whether the action of the management of UCO bank in

terminating the services of the workman with effect from 19.8.92 and not giving him one –time opportunity for

absorption in terms of the Approach Paper circulated by Ministry of Finance in 1990 is justified or not?

It is the specific case of the 2^nd party workman is that on 26.3.88 he started service as a peon in Goadbaga

branch of UCO Bank and continued to work till 19.8.92 with break of two days after competing 89 days of work each

time and he has been improperly debarred from being empanelled for absorption in the bank permanently. But the

management has vehemently objected the assertion of the workman through M.W.1 and have stated that the 2^nd party

workman was engaged in the bank as a water boy only to supply water to the staff and customers in the summer

season and he was engaged as a casual worker. M.W.2 has also lent corroboration to the aforesaid statement of M.W.1

by stating that the workman was engaged as a water boy. But to substantiate his claim that he was working throughout

the year on all the bank working days on daily wage basis and was doing mustifarious works like cleaning the bank

premises. Supply snacks, giving bank intimation to the customers and also maintaining the balance register in the

bank. At times, during his evidence the workman has proved the balance register dt. 31.5.88, 21.11.88, 30.11.88 and

31.12.91 maintained by him in his hand which have been marked as Ext. B, C and D. The workman has further stated

that he was receiving his wages in direct cash and at times his wages were being deposited in his bank account. The

said statement of the workman has also been admitted by M.W.1. The evidence of the workman also reveals that on

6.3.92 he was sent to Sambalpur by the bank on official duty for which he was paid T.A of Rs.25/ - vide Ext. F and on

9.4.92 he had done extra work in the bank for which he has been paid Rs.20/- vide Ext. G. Similarly on 16.8.91 he was

sent to Brajrajnagar on official duty for carrying cash for which he was paid Rs.25/- as T.A vide Ext. E/26. He was

also paid bonus every year and Ext. E/56 is the bonus for the year 1991-92. As such the balance register marked Exts.

B.C & D clearly shows that the 2^nd party workman was working in the bank from 1988 as claimed by him and from

Ext. F,G,E/26 and E/56 it is crystal clear that he was not a seasonal worker engaged only for summer season and

negatives the claim of the managements that he was engaged as a water boy. Also maintenance of Ext. B,C & D by

the workman, is going to Sambalpur & Brajrajnagar on official duty shows that he was engaged in the bank for doing

multigarious works But from the above documentary evidence it cannot be inferred that the workman was working

throughout the year on bank working days on daily wages basis as a sub staff of the bank because the workman being

examined as W.W.1 in his cross examination dt. 10.12.13 has fairly admitted that he was initially appointed as water

boy, only to supply water and in the year 1988 he has worked for 76 days, in 1989 has worked for 85 days, in 1990 he

has worked for 85 days, in 1991 he has worked for 205 days and in 1992 he has worked for 173 days. As such from

1988 till 1992 the workman has never worked for 240 days continuously in a year and his statement that he was

engaged in 1988 and was working throughout the year on bank working days on daily wage basis is found to be false.

Of course Ext. A.B.C.D. F & G show that at times he was engaged in other bank work, but that was unofficial because

the workman (W.W.1) has fairly admitted in cross examination on 10.12.13 that the Bank Manager had not given him

any official order to handle with financial transaction and to maintain cash book etc. The cross examination of the

workman ( W.W.1) on 1.6.99 also reveals that before his initial engagement he was not called for any interview nor

his name was sponsored by the Employment Exchange. The bank had only called him and asked him to work. His

cross examination also reveals that he was not given any order in writing to proceed to Sambalpur for official work.

He has also admitted that one Pitchu Barua was working as cash peon in the bank and on 16.8.91 the said Barua was

present in his duty and he was taken by the bank clerk to Sambalpur only to load and unload the cash box. The

workman has also admitted in cross examination that there was one sweeper attached to the bank and one Daftari was

also engaged in the bank while he was working in the bank. So when a sweeper was engaged to sweep and clean the

bank premises, it is hard to believe that the workman was engaged for the said purpose. Likewise when there was a

permanent Daftari it cannot be believed that the workman was being engaged as a daftari by the management. The

cross examination of the workman (W.W.1) on 10.12.13 also discloses that as per his admit card, Ext. H his date of

birth is 7.2.1971 and he had not completed 18 years of age when he was initially appointed in the bank. He has also

admitted that after the disposal of the present I.D. case by this Tribunal in the year 1989 he had made an application to

the bank in the year 2000 for his appointment. But the bank had intimated him that as he had not competed 18 years of

age at the time of initial appointment, his service cannot be regularised. This witness also admits that he knew that in

the year 1989 there was a bank circular for regularisation of the services of the temporary bank employees basing on

the agreement between the management of the bank and the trade union vide Ext. 3 and he had not fulfilled all the

criterias fixed in the agreement executed between the management of the bank and the trade union for which the bank

had denied service to him. From the discussion made above it can be safely concluded that the 2^nd party workman

Manabhanjan Bhoi was not a sub staff of the bank and even if he is held to be a sub staff he is not entitled for

absorption in terms of Approach Paper circulated by Ministry of Finance in the year 1990. Inview of his own

admission that he had not completed 18 years of age when he was appointed and he was not called for any interview

nor his name was sponsored by Employment Exchange and he had not fulfilled all the criterias fixed in the agreement

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 20] [email protected] 29] 1938

3901

executed between the management of bank and the trade union. As such this Tribunal is of the view that the action of

the management of UCO Bank, Goadbaga, District: Sambalpur in terminating the services of Sri Manabhanjan Bhoi

with effect from 19.8.92 and not giving him one-time opportunity for absorption in terms of the Approach Paper

circulated by Ministry of Finance in the year 1990 is justified and this Issue is answered accordingly.

Issue Nos. I & II:- Since neither side have raised any objection before the Tribunal that the reference is bad in

law it is held that the reference is not bad in law. In view of the findings of this Tribunal given vide Issue No. II the

2^nd party workman is not entitled for any relief as claimed by him. Accordingly the reference is answered.

Dictated & corrected by me.

S. K. MOHANTY, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 12 vxLr] 2016

dk-vk- 1741-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj MCY;wlh,y

ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 94@08) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 12-08-2016 dks izkIr gqvk

FkkA

[la- ,y&22012@21@2008&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)]

jktsUæ ¯lg] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 12th August, 2016

S.O. 1741.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 94/08) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Western Coalfieds

Limited and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 12.08.2016.

[No. L-22012/21/2008-IR (CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

JABALPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/R/94/08

Shri Moh. NaseemSiddiqui,

Zonal Mahamantri,

C.Mewa, Zonal VekoliShakha,

Ward No.10, Gudhi, Post Palachaurai,

Chhindwara

…Workman/Union

Versus

Chief General Manager,

Western Coalfields Limited,

Kanhan Area,

PO Dungaria,

Chhindwara

…Management

A W A R D

Passed on this 17^th day of June, 2016

As per letter dated 30-6-08 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is

received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.L-

22012/21/2008-IR(CM-II). The dispute under reference relates to:

“Whether the action of the management of M/s. WCL in denying employment to KumariManisha D/o Late

Shri Ramlal on compassionate basis is legal and justified? To what relief is the dependent of the deceased workman

entitled?”

After receiving reference, notices were issued to the parties. Ist party submitted statement of claim through Zonal

Secretary of the Union. Case of Ist party is that Union is a registered trade Union having its registration No. 2055/77.

The dispute is raised under authority given by Kumari Manisha. That her father Ramlal was in employment of 2^nd party

management. He died on 16-9-96. In harness. As per service rules, the dependent of employee is entitled for

3902

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 20, 2016/SRAVANA 29, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

compassionate appointment to come over the sudden crisis. That after death of Shri Ramlal, Smt. Jugnibai widow of

Ramlal submitted an application for appointment on compassionate ground for her daughter submitting that her

daughter was dependent. Her application was turned down on the pretext that no rule provide compassionate

appointment to a female member. Information was given vide letter dated 27-10-97. The widow of deceased Ramlal

informed management that her son was not capable of discharging duties as he is remaining sick and he died on 8-6-

02. Thereafter again claimant Manisha submitted application on 16-3-04 requesting that she may be allowed

appointment on compassionate ground in place of her deceased father. That both of her brother has died and there was

no make member in the family. She received reply dated 12-5-05 that since the matter was referred to Competent

Authority who had not agreed to consider her case for giving her compassionate appointment as it is a belated case.

Again she was informed by letter dated 28-8-06 by Assistant Chief Personal Manager, Bakoli that as desired by her, a

certificate was sent to her regarding rejection of her application for compassionate appointment. Union submits action

of management is unjustifiable as dependents of the family of deceased employee Ramlal are thrown into hell for

struggle and after rejection of compassionate appointment to Ku. Manisha she is struggling for daily bread with her

handicapped mother and other young family members. After death of Ramlal, she is dependent family member being

unmarried daughter. On such ground, Istparty submits that claimant Manisha is entitled to get appointment

immediately after death of her father.

2^nd party filed Written Statement opposing claim of Ist party workman. 2^nd party also submits that Late Ramlal

was working as Mechanical Fitter at Rakhikol colliery of WCL, he died on 16-9-97. That service conditions of coal

mines are covered by NCWA executed from time to time. The provision of employment to dependent came into effect

w.e.f. 1-1-79 during implementation of NCWA II. Said provision had been carried out through with modifications as

and when required. That the NCWA VI deals with employment/monetary compensation to female dependent under

clause 9.5.0. reproduced below-

“ In case of death either in mine accident or for any other reason or medical unfitness under clause 9.4.0, if no

employment has been offered and the male dependent of the concerned worker is 12 years and above in age, he

will be kept on a live roster and would be provided employment commensurate with is skill and qualifications

when he attain the age of 18 years. During the period the male dependent is on live roster, the female dependent

will be paid monetary compensation as per rates at para (i) and (ii) above. This will be effective from 1-1-2000.”

2^nd party further submits that as per official record as well as declaration given by the widow of deceased

workman the family particulars are Smt. Jugna-widow 40 years, Sunil Kumar-son 24 years, Anil Kumar son 21 years,

Ku.Bhagwati daughter- 25 years, Ku. Manisha daughter- 20 years. That the widow of deceased did not apply for

employment, she submitted application in favour of her daughter Ku.Manisha for employment alongwith certain

documents including affidavit stating that her son Anil residing separately with his family, no objection from other

legal heirs were not filed by her alongwith application. Said application was submitted in 1999. Application was

forwarded to Competent Authority by Area concerned. The Competent Authority vide order dated 24-7-06 regret to

provide employment to the dependent on the ground that the claimant has approached belatedly. The widow submitted

an application that she doesnot want to recommend for employment to any of her son/ daughter including Ku. Manisha

and she wanted the monetary benefit available under the said scheme for herself. Said application was forwarded to

the Competent Authority on 13-5-2000.

After the statement of claim is filed by Ist party, additional Written Statement is filed by 2^nd party at Page 14.

The management without prejudice to its contentions in earlier exparte Written Statement submits that Late Ramlal was

not member of Union on such ground, Union has no locus-standi to raise the dispute. That management had informed

claimant that when male members are alive, dependent female cannot be provided employment. The family particulars

of the deceased shows that there were male dependents, hence the claim made by the claimant was not tenable. That

the widow mother has specifically told the management that she is not prepared for recommend for providing

employment to her children, she claimed financial compensation under the scheme. That the widow of Late Ramlal is

entitled for the monetary benefits as per prevailing scheme. That claimant Manisha is not entitled for compassionate

appointment. On such ground, 2^nd party prays that reference be answered in its favour.

Considering pleadings on record, the points which arise for my consideration and determination are as under. My

findings are recorded against each of them for the reasons as below:-

(i) Whether the action of the management of M/s.

WCL in denying employment to Kumari Manisha

D/o Late ShriRamlal on compassionate basis is

legal and justified?

In Negative

(ii) If not, what relief the workman is entitled to?”

As per final order.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 20] [email protected] 29] 1938

3903

REASONS

Point No.1- the terms of reference pertains to legality of denial of compassionate appointment to claimant

Manisha D/o Deceased employee Ramlal. The copy of Memo of Agreement Exhibit M-1 is produced. Clause 9.5.0

provides-

(I)

In case of death due to mine accident, the female dependant would have the option to either accept the

monetary compensation of Rs.4000 per month or employment irrespective of her age.

(II) In case of death/ total permanent disablement due to cause other than mine accident, medical unfitness

under Clause 9.4.0, if the female dependent is below the age of 45 years she will have the option either to

accept the monetary compensation of Rs.3000 per month or employment.

In case the female dependent is above 45 years of age she will be entitled only to monetary compensation and not

to employment.

Keeping above aspect in view, the evidence adduced by parties and documents needs to be considered.

Claimant Manisha filed affidavit of her evidence stating that her father Ramlal died on 16-9-96. Her mother

submitted application for compassionate appointment on 17-10-97. Said application was rejected on the ground that

female member was not entitled for compassionate appointment. As per rule, only male dependents were entitled to

compassionate appointment. Her mother had informed management that her son was not able to work. Thereafter her

son died on 8-6-02. Again claimant Manisha submitted application for compassionate appointment on 16-3-04 on the

ground that there was no male dependent in the family, her brothers were dead. She received reply to said application

on 12-5-05 and letter dated 28-8-06 that her claim for compassionate appointment could not be allowed for the ground

of delay. Ist party workman has produced documents Exhibit W-1 to W-10. In her cross-examination, claimant

Manisha says W-9 & 10 were written by ShriShashiShekhar clerk who was working outside the office of management.

Those applications were written as per their say. In 1997, the applications were submitted. She was of 18 years of age.

Applications W-9,10 were given in dispatch section. She admits that if application is given in dispatch section, receipt

is given imposing office seal. When her father died, age of her mother was more than 45 years. Her elder brother died

before death of her father. Her brother Anil Kumar was of 25-26 years age at the time of death of her father. Shri Anil

Kumar died in the year 1000-01. Her sister Bhagwati is married and she resides at different place. After letter given by

management she submitted no objection of other LRs of deceased. She denies that she not submitted NOC of other

dependents.

Evidence of management’s witness Shri Milind Ganveer is n the point that as per family particulars of deceased

workman, he left dependentsSmt. Jugna-widow 40 years, Sunil Kumar-son 24 years, Anil Kumar son 21 years,

Ku.Bhagwati daughter- 25 years, Ku Manisha daughter- 20 years. That application for compassionate appointment was

forwarded to Competent Authority concerned area vide letter dated 24-7-06. That widow of deceased workman did not

want to recommend employment of her daughter Manisha. The area concerned forwarded the application to Competent

Authority on 13-5-2010. That the widow wanted monetary benefits. Management’s witness in his further evidence says

that the application is submitted by widow Jugnabai. At that time, he was working as Personal Manager. Application is

admitted in evidence at Exhibit M-17. Management’s witness also admitted his signature on Exhibit M-18. In his cross-

examination, management’s witness says that employee Ramlal died on 16-9-97, Jugnabai submitted application for

compassionate appointment for her daughter Manisha on 17-10-97. He denies that after death of Ramlal only Jugnabai

and Manisha were his dependents. Service record of Ramlal is produced. He claims ignorance that Anil Kumar S/o

Ramlal died. He admits that compassionate appointment to Manisha was rejected on the ground of delay. As per

Exhibit M-17, monetary benefits are not paid, the matter is still pending.

10.

Smt. Jugnabai in her evidence says her husband was working as Fitter. She did not remember date of his death.

That she had no issues, she was residing alone. Her son Sunil and Anil died. Manisha is her daughter but she resides

separately. She claims to be dependent of her husband Ramlal. That she is not willing to give any benefit to other

persons accrued to be as widow of Ramlal. She desires to take those benefits in her lifetime. That she is not

recommending compassionate appointment for her daughter. In her cross, Jugna says Manisha is her daughter but

residing separately. She has married at Rakhikol. She had not performed her marriage, she did not see Manisha residing

with her husband. In cross-examination by Advocate A.K.Shashi by management JugnaBai says that claimant is her

daughter since past 6 years, she is residing separate from her. The claimant herself married without her knowledge.

Claimant has 3 sons, claimant had not married with her consent. She is not consent for compassionate appointment to

claimant Manisha.

11.

The documentary evidence on record needs to be considered. Exhibit M-1 is copy of application dated 6-9-99

submitted by Manisha for compassionate appointment, Exhibit M-2 is copy of application dated 6-9-99 submitted by

widow Jugnabai not to give compassionate appointment to her son Anil Kumar, he was residing separately and she has

3904

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 20, 2016/SRAVANA 29, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

no relation with him. Exhibit M-3 is copy of proposal for compassionate appointment after death of Ramlal, his widow

Jugnabai, son Sunil, Anil daughters Bhagwati and Manisha are shown as dependents. Exhibit M-4 is copy of

marksheet of claimant of Manisha of SSC. Exhibit M-5 is certificate about death of Ramlal on 16-9-97. M-6 is copy of

affidavit submitted by Jugnabai recommending compassionate appointment for claimant Manisha and denying

compassionate appointment to her son Anil. Said affidavit is of dated 3-11-97. Age of Manisha is shown 21 years.

Manisha has stated that if her mother is not specified with her, she was ready to pay half of her salary to her mother. M-

8 is service excerpt of Late Ramlal, his dependents are shown at reverse page. M-9 is Medical Certificate issued by

Dr.G.C.Chourasia about birth of Manisha, M-10 is caste certificate of Ramlal, M-11 is copy of marksheet of Manisha.

M-12 is death certificate of Ramlal, died on 16-9-97. M-13 is copy of Identity card of Manisha, M-14 is letter dated

26-5-05 informing that management not agreed to consider case for compassionate appointment of claimant Manisha.

12.

The documents produced by workman Exhibit W-1 is death certificate of Ramlal, W-2 is service exerpt of

Ramlal identical set of documents are produced by management. Exhibit W-10 is application submitted by Jugna Bai

that her sons Anil was not fit for service, she used to quarrel in drunken condition she recommended compassionate

appointment to Manisha. W-3 is letter informing Jugnabai that when male dependents are alive, it is not possible to

allow compassionate appointment to female dependents. W-4 is death certificate of Anil, W-5 is letter dated 12-5-05

informing decision of management that compassionate appointment to Manisha could not be allowed.

13.

The substance of the documents on record are clear that though application was submitted by Manisha and

widow in 1999 management informed in 2005-06 that compassionate appointment could not be allowed to Manisha as

the application was belated. What management had done during 99 to 2006 is not clear from the evidence adduced by

the management. The claimant Manisha could not be blamed for delay when she submitted application in 1999. As per

document Exhibit W-3, Jugnabai was informed when there were male dependants, it was not possible to allow

compassionate appointment to female dependents.

14.

Memorandum of agreement M-1 Para 9.5 is clear that when female dependent is below age of 45 years, she has

option to accept monetary compensation Rs.3000 per month or employment. In documents on record at the time of

death of Ramlal, age of Jugnabai was 40 years. During all those years, neither she was paid monetary compensation nor

any decision was taken on application of Manisha from 99 to 2005 and lastly her claim was rejected for delay.

Manisha could not be blamed for it. Considering reasons discussed above, the action of the management is not proper

and legal. Accordingly I record my finding in Point No.1 in Negative.

15.

Point No.2- despite of Para 9.5.0 (I) & (II) the female dependents i.e. widow was entitled for monetary benefits,

management has not taken decision in that regard for last 19 years. The document Exhibit W-7 shows that the officials

of the management tried to pursue that Jugnabai widow of deceased employee may accept monetary benefits. The

application Exhibit M-17 was submitted by Jugnabai on 19-5-08 for claiming monetary compensation if it is not

possible to provide compassionate employment to Manisha after death of her husband. Management has not taken

decision till date in the matter. Considering the circumstances discussed above, the claim for compassionate

appointment of Manisha is justified with the condition that amount Rs.4000 per month from her salary be paid to

widow Jugna Bai till her death. Accordingly I record my finding in Point No.2.

16.

In the result, award is passed as under:-

(1)

The action of the management is not proper and legal.

(2)

2^nd party management is directed to provide compassionate appointment to the claimant Manisha subject to

the condition that Rs.4000/- per month from her salary be paid to Smt. Jugna, widow of deceased

workman.

R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 12 vxLr] 2016

dk-vk- 1742-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj MCY;wlh,y

ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 77@02) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 12-08-2016 dks izkIr gqvk

FkkA

[la- ,y&22012@13@2000&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)]

jktsUæ ¯lg] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 20] [email protected] 29] 1938

3905

New Delhi, the 12th August, 2016

S.O. 1742.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 77/02) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Western Coalfieds

Limited, and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 12.08.2016.

[No. L-22012/13/2000-IR (CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

JABALPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/R/77/02

Shri Keshavrao,

C/o Shri Kisanaji Kabarkar,

R/o Vill. Koliya,

PO Hatnapur, Tehsil Multai,

Betul

…Workman

Versus

General Manager,

Western Coalfield Limited,

P.O Pathakhera,

Betul

…Management

AWARD

Passed on this 27^th day of June 2016

As per letter dated 20-5-02 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is

received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.L-

22012/13/2000-IR(CM-II). The dispute under reference relates to:

“Whether the action of the management of M/S Western Coalfields Ltd. Pathakhera Area, Distt. Betul in

terminating the services of ShriKeshavraow.e.f. 1-4-96 is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the

workman is entitled to?”

After receiving reference, notices were issued to the parties. Ist party workman submitted statement of claim at

Page 2/1 to 2/7. Case of Ist party workman is that he was appointed on post of loader on 12-5-97 in same. He worked as

loader till 7-8-75, thereafter he was disengaged. Letter was issued by Attendance Clerk Shri A.R. Raipure on the basis

of said letter, he was appointed in other mine. He worked as loader. That Labour Officer Mr. Suryavanshi wrongly

recorded his name Krishna S/o Isna at the time of 2^nd appointment. In Satpura mine at the time of his first appointment,

his name was recorded as Keshav Rao S/o Kisna. He also submitted application in writing for correction of his name.

again he submitted application on 29-3-76 to Welfare Officer, 3-4 Nuclear Mines. His name was not corrected as per

his request and applications in writing. Ist party workman consider that in case of his death, his LRs may face

difficulties. He had approached the Officer. He was directed to file affidavit in name of Keshavrao was known as

Krishna. On advice of the Officer, he submitted affidavit on 1-4-81. From 29-10-75 to 3-8-82, he worked as general

loader, from 6-8-82 to 20-7-83, he was performing timering work. From 21-7-83 to 5-4-84, he was doing deplaring

work. From 6-6-84 to 5-12-84, he was doing work of shot firing, from 6-12-84 to 31-5-88 general work. He worked for

12 years 6 months and 28 days in Pathakhera mines. ShriP.K.Chatterjee had signed the record and MTK Balwant

counter signed. On 12-12-91, he passed exam of Sirdar.

He was granted permission for said exam in name of Keshav Rao. On 24-2-93, he passed TVC exam. In the

year 1993, Labour Officer again asked him to submit affidavit from Notary. Thereafter workman submitted notarized

affidavit on 7-12-93. On 4-1-94, Suptd of Mine No.2 issued office order about his promotion as Mining Sirdar. On 24-

1-94, his promotion was cancelled. On 4-1-94, he was promoted as Mining Sirdar and his promotion was cancelled on

24-1-94 without explaining any reasons to him. Any showcause notice was not issued. The Officer of the department

directed him to again file affidavit about correction of his name. he submitted affidavit of correction of his name on

12-4-94. He was complied with the directions of the Officers. He has not committed any kind of misconduct. For

mistakes committed by the Officers of the department, any cumulative act against him is not legal. Ist party further

submits that chargesheet was issued to him on 3-2-94 calling his explanation. Without correcting his name as per his

request, the workman was dismissed from service. workman feeling aggrieved filed proceeding before Labour Court,

3906

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 20, 2016/SRAVANA 29, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Betul and dispute was also raised before RLC, Bhopal. The staff in Pathakhera deliberately shown negligence. His

request for correction of name was not considered as Keshav Rao S/o Kisna instead of Krishna S/o Isna. Though the

negligence was of the staff working in the mine, he was dismissed from service illegally.

2^nd party filed Written Statement at Page 4/1 to 4/10 opposing claim of workman. 2^nd party submits that one

Krishna S/o Isna resident of Kolia, Tehsil Multai, Distt. Betul was appointed as Loader from 29-10-75. Appointment

order was issued in his name. however workman reported to duty and resumed duty in name of Krishna S/o Isna.

Subsequently management came to know that name of workman is Keshav Rao S/o Kisna and not Krishna S/o Isna.

Workman committed fraud, therefore chargesheet was issued to him on 3-2-94 for the charges workman obtained

employment giving his false name and education. Chargesheet was replied by workman. His reply was found

unsatisfactory. Shri D.C. Jha was appointed as Enquiry Officer. Shri A.K. Singore was appointed as Management

Representative. Enquiry was conducted against workman on various dates. Management as well as workman has laid

oral and documentary evidence. Enquiry Officer submitted his report holding workman guilty of the charges against

him. Considering the findings of Enquiry Officer, Competent Authority imposed punishment of dismissal. Workman

was dismissed from service as per order dated 31-3-96.

2^nd party reiterates that workman Keshav Rao S/o Kisna reported on duty in name of Krishna S/o Kisna. No

appointment order was issued in name of Keshav Rao to workman. All adverse contentions of workman are denied. It

is reiterated that management’s witnesses were examined. Workman was granted opportunity to cross examine. The

findings of Enquiry Officer are based on evidence. For proved misconduct, workman is not entitled to any relief.

Vide order dated 1-5-2013, enquiry conducted against workman is found vitiated. Management of 2^nd party was

allowed to prove misconduct against workman.

Considering pleadings on record and findings on enquiry, the points which arise for my consideration and

determination are as under. My findings are recorded against each of them for the reasons as below:-

(i) Whether the 2^nd party management proves

misconduct/ charges alleged against workman?

In Negative

(ii) Whether the action of the management of M/S

Western Coalfields Ltd. Pathakhera Area, Distt.

Betul in terminating the services of Shri Keshav

Rao w.e.f. 1-4-96 is legal and justified?

In Negative

(ii) If not, what relief the workman is entitled to?”

As per final order.

REASONS

Point No.1- Enquiry conducted against workman is found vitiated as per order dated 1-5-2013, management

was granted permission to prove misconduct/ charges against workman.

The charges alleged against workman pertains to obtaining employment giving his false name of himself, his

father and false information of his education. After enquiry was held vitiated , management was granted permission to

prove misconduct, management filed affidavit of witness ShriRasid Ahmed, Shri B.K. Mishra. However both witnesses

of the management failed to appear for their cross-examination. It was therefore observed that evidence of both

witnesses shall not be considered. Management did not adduce evidence f any other witness as such management has

absolutely failed to adduce evidence to prove charges adduced against workman. Workman filed affidavit of his

evidence. Workman states in his affidavit that he was appointed on 12-5-75 as labour and worked till 7-8-75. He was

appointed in other mine, his name was wrongly written as Krishna S/ Kisna by Labour Officer, he was terminated on

31-3-96. After his dismissal from service, he is not working any where. He is having financial problems. His relative

and friends bear expenses of his family. Said affidavit was not pressed by workman. As such both parties have not

adduced evidence w.r.t. charges alleged against workman. For above reasons, I record my finding in Point No.1 in

Negative.

10.

Point No.2- In view of my finding in Point No.1 charges against workman are not proved, punishment of

dismissal against workman cannot be sustained. Learned counsel for 2^nd party Shri A.K. Shashi emphasized that name

of workman was Keshav Rao, S/o Isna joined duty in the mine in the name of Krishna S/o Isna and secured

employment in wrong name and though the charges are not proved against workman, any relief should not be granted

to the workman. Above argument are opposed by learned counsel for workman Shri Himanshu Srivastav. The pleading

between parties disclosed that workman repeatedly approached management for correction of his name from Keshav

Rao S/o Isna to Krishna, S/O Isna. Management has not adduced any evidence whether any person by name Krishna

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 20] [email protected] 29] 1938

3907

S/o Isna was really existing and workman had dishonestly secured employment why the correction in name requested

by workman was not accepted. Even the documents about education submitted by workman were accepted or not? In

absence of such evidence and when charges are not proved, the dismissal of workman from service cannot be sustained.

Workman deserves to be reinstated in service, the punishment of dismissal is not justified. For above reasons, I record

my finding in point No.2.

11.

In the result, award is passed as under:-

(1)

The action of the management is not proper and legal.

(2)

2^nd party is directed to reinstate workman with continuity of service with full back wages.

Amount of back wages shall be paid to workman within 30 days from the date of notification of award. In case

of default, amount shall carry 9 % interest per annum from the date of award till its realization.

R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 12 vxLr] 2016

dk-vk- 1743-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj ,lbZlh,y

ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 30@1997) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 12-08-2016 dks izkIr

gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&22012@458@1994&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)]

jktsUæ ¯lg] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 12th August, 2016

S.O. 1743.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 30/1997) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the management of South Eastern

Coalfieds Limited and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 12.08.2016.

[No. L-22012/458/1994-IR (CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

JABALPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/R/30/97

General Secretary,

National Colliery Workers Federation (NLO),

J & K Area,

Post Kotma Colliery,

Distt.Shahdol (MP)

Workman/Union

Versus

Sub Area Manager,

Kurja UG Project, SECL,

Post Bijuri,

Distt.Shahdol.

Management

AWARD

Passed on this 30^th day of June 2016

As per letter dated 7-2-97by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is received.

The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.L-22012/458/94/IR

(C-II). The dispute under reference relates to:

3908

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 20, 2016/SRAVANA 29, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

“Whether the action of the management of Kurja U/G Project of Hadeo Area of SECL in not regularizing the

services of workers employed at Kurja Project is just and legal? If not, to what relief the concerned workmen

are entitled?”

After receiving reference, notices were issued to the parties. Ist party Union submitted statement of claim. Case

of Ist party Union is that Union is registered under Trade Union Act. It has large membership in colliery of SECL in

MP, CG including Kurja Project. That service conditions of SECL are governed by NCWA, Mines Act, Coal Mines

Regulations etc. That Government of India issuing notification prohibited the contract labour in the underground

mines. The workers whose names have been referred to this Tribunal have worked in the prohibited category directly

under the SECL. Therefore they are entitled for benefit of regularization. It is further submitted that workers shown in

the list referred to this Tribunal for adjudication were initially appointed in the post of Category I Mazdoorw.e.f. 26-5-

90 to Sept.90 in the prohibited category jobs like stone drift, stone cutting and earth removing, earth cutting, loading

and unloading and transportation of coal in the underground mines of Kurja Project. The workers were initially

appointed directly by the 2^nd party during May 90 to Sept.90. they were ordered to perform duty of Category-I Mazdoor

in the field of mining operation of Kurja Mines of Hasdeo Area. The workers continued to work till December 1992.

Management of SECL used to supervise their work. Their attendance was marked in Form C Register. All workers

were directly working under the control and supervision of the management of Kurja Project. Management used to pay

wages directly. Workers were also given other benefits like payment of bonus Act, Category I wages under NCWA and

other benefits. Even coal mine provident fund contribution was deducted from the salaries of the workers and was

deposited with the Coal Mine Provident Fund Authority. Contribution was deducted from their salaries of the workers

and was deposited with the Coal Mine Provident Fund Authority.

Ist party further submits that tools like Ganty, phawda, drill rod, drill machine, haulage machine and other

required equipments for the purpose of coal raising were provided by the management. It is submitted that in

December 1992, management adopted unfair labor practice and with a view to victimize the workers, changed their

service conditions without issuing any notice under Section-9 of ID Act, 1947. The workers were directed to perform

duties under various contractor. Despite of it, overall supervision and control was of management of SECL because the

nature of job was not changed. Union further submits that during 1991 to 1994, workers were working in Kurja Project

underground Mines. Due to their service, coal production reached to the maximum. During May 1990 to Sept-90, there

was direct employer employee relationship between worker and the management. After serving more than 5 years

instead of absorbing or regularizing employees, they were stopped from duties. It is alleged that workman were

depriving their benefits for regularization is unfair labor practice under Item 10, Schedule V. workmen are illegally

stopped from performing their duties in violation of provisions of ID Act. On such ground, Union prays that denial of

regularization of services of all those workers is illegal and workmen be allowed regularization.

2^nd party has filed Written Statement opposing claim of Union. 2^nd party submits that term of reference is

highly prejudicial to its reference. The reference is vague. The particulars of claimants for identification are not given.

The period of engagement, nature of employment, particulars of ages are not disclosed. That claimants are not covered

as workman under Section 2(s) of ID Act. Personal identification of claimant’s employment are not produced.

Government has committed error in terming the claimants as workman. Claimants were not in employment of the

management. There is no question of their regularization in service. employment of claimant is highly disputed

question. It should not have been decided by the Government, the reference is misconceived and liable to be rejected.

It is submitted that person seeking employment in coal industry needs to go through the procedure prescribed

for appointment. When person appointed following such procedure would be considered for absorption. That

management used to engage contractors following the rules. The contractor used to engage labour for execution of

work awarded to him. Management has no control or supervision of labours engaged by the contractor. The

appointments and termination of services of labours engaged by the contractor, management has no concern. Similarly

liability to pay remuneration tolabours engaged by contractor is of the contractor himself.

All material contentions of Istparty Union in statement of claim have been denied. It is denied that claimants

were appointed as Cat-I Mazdoor during the period 26-5-90 to Sept.90 in prohibited category for work of stone drifting,

stone cutting etc. The recovery of CMPF contribution from wages paid to claimants have been denied. Claimants were

not engaged. There is no question of stopping them from duties. It is further submitted unless particulars of contract,

the period of contract are disclosed, management is unable to offer its comments. On such ground, 2^nd party prays for

rejection of claim under reference.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 20] [email protected] 29] 1938

3909

Considering pleadings on record, the points which arise for my consideration and determination are as under.

My findings are recorded against each of them for the reasons as below:-

(i) Whether the action of the management of Kurja

U/G Project of Hadeo Area of SECL in not

regularizing the services of workers employed at

Kurja Project is just and legal?

In Affirmative

(ii) If not, what relief the workman is entitled to?”

Workmen are not entitled to any relief.

REASONS

Point No.1- The term of reference pertains to denial of regularization to the claimants workman by management

of SECL. 2^nd party management had denied claimants were appointed at any time for the prohibited category of work in

underground mine. Identical affidavit of evidence are filed by ShriAsharaf S/o Shri Muhammad Gafur, Shri Rahim S/o

Late Shri Abdul Karim, Shri Sameed S/o Shri ShabbarMiyan. All the witnesses of Ist party Union have stated in their

affidavit that they were working in underground mines during theperiod May 1990 to December 1992. That they were

engaged as Category I Mazdoor around May 1990, they continued to work underground mine. The instructions

required for the work were supplied by the management. The instructions for work were given to them by overman,

their attendance was maintained by Shri Ramkaran Singh and Ramphal Sharma were incharge. CMPF contribution

was deducted from their wages, they worked more than 240 days during each of the calendar year. They were stopped

from work from November 1994. If they would have been regularized by management, they would not have stopped

from work by the contractor.

Shri Ashraf in his cross-examination says he was engaged by management on 18-5-90, 250 persons were

engaged along with him. He was unable to tell name of Officer engaging him. He had not submitted application for job

he was interviewed. He was unable to tell the date of interview. 10 persons were interviewed with him. Appointment

letter was not given to him. He did not recollect whether his name was sent through Employment Exchange. He did not

recollect Kurja underground mines comes under which area. In his further cross-examination, witness says foreman

Ramlal was giving instruction for work. He was unable to tell whether Ramlal is still in employment of 2^nd party.

Wages were paid by the officer, he was unable to tell name of the Officer. The payment was made after end of the

month. His signatures used to be obtained on register. He was unable to tell his working days in the year 1990. His

attendance was maintained by clerk Shri Ramkaran Singh. He was unable to tell what kind of vocational training was

given to him. He had requested for regularization in 1993-94 but request was not made in writing. Shri Abdul Karim in

his cross examination says appointment letter was not given to him. He did not give clear reply to the question whether

appointments in 2^nd party used to made as per rules. That he disengaged in the year 1994. Shri Sameed in his cross-

examination says appointment letter was not given to him, he did not reply to the question whether he had received any

letter about his termination in the year 1992. The evidence of all the witnesses is clear that they were stopped from

work in the year 1994. Any of them are not in employment of the management.

10.

Evidence of management’s witness Shri M.V. Lakra and Shri Biresh Shukla is by way of denial of the

engagement and employment of the claimants. Despite 2^nd party has raised contentions in Written Statement that

particulars of claimants are not given, list is not submitted, list of claimants on whose behalf the reference has been

raised by Union is not received along with order of reference. As such who are claimants seeking regularization of their

services is not clear. On whose behalf, Union is prosecuting the dispute under reference, therefore could not be known.

The document Exhibit W-1 pertains to the training given by management to 5 employees name of Rahim is at Sl.No.1.

11.

Learned counsel for Ist party Shri Shailendra Pandey submitted copy of standing orders of SECL.

Para3.5 pertains to A permanent workman is one who is employed on a job of permanent nature for a period of atleast

6 months or who has satisfactorily put in 6 months continuous service in a permanent post as a probationer.

When list of workers is not received along with order of reference, union without taking care of it has proceeded in the

matter. The claim of Union therefore cannot be accepted.

12.

Incidentally I may refer to ratio cited by Shri A. K. Shashi for management on bunch of cases.

In case between Oshiar Prasad and others versus employers in relation to the management of Sudamdih Coal

Washery of BCCL, Dhanbad, Jharkhand reported in 2015-I-LLJ-513(SC). Their Lordship held-Appellant not in

service of either contractor or/ and BCCL on date of making reference in question. No industrial dispute that

existed or apprehended in relation to appellant’s absorption in services of BCCL on date of making reference.

3910

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 20, 2016/SRAVANA 29, 1938 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Since the appellant’s services discontinued or and retrenched long back, question of absorption or regularization

did not arise.”

In present case, the pleading and evidence of Ist party and its witnesses are clear that the claimants were stopped

from duty in November 1994. The dispute has been referred as per order dated 7-2-97, any of the claimants were not in

working with 2^nd party at the time of raising dispute. Therefore claim for regularization of the Union cannot be

established.

13.

Other citation in the bunch are not relevant to the controversy in present reference, therefore I am not

inclined to discuss those citations for reasons as claimants were not in employment since November 1994. The claim

for regularization by Union cannot be accepted. Besides it, list of claimants is not received along with order therefore

also the claim cannot be accepted. For above reasons, I record my finding in Point No.1 in Affirmative.

14.

In the result, award is passed as under:-

(1)

The action of the management is proper and legal.

(2)

Workmen are not entitled to any relief.

R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer

Uploaded by the Dte. of Printing at Government of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi-110064

and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi-110054.

HARINDRA

KUMAR

Digitally signed by

HARINDRA KUMAR

Date: 2016.09.08

09:58:12 +05'30'