611 GI/2017

(639)

jftLVªh la- Mh- ,y- (,u) 04@0007@2003µ05

REGD. No. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05

izkf/dkj ls izdkf'kr

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

lkIrkfgd

WEEKLY

la- 7]

ubZ fnYyh] iQjojh 12—iQjojh 18] 2017] 'kfuokj@ ek?k 23—ek?k 29] 1938

No. 7]

NEW DELHI, FEBRUARY 12—FEBRUARY 18, 2017, SATURDAY/ MAGHA 23—MAGHA 29, 1938

bl Hkkx esa fHkUu i`"B la[;k nh tkrh gS ftlls fd ;g i`Fkd ladyu ds :i esa j[kk tk lds

Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

Hkkx II—[k.M 3—mi&[k.M (ii)

PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)

Hkkjr ljdkj ds ea=kky;ksa (j{kk ea=kky; dks NksM+dj) }kjk tkjh fd, x, lkafof/d vkns'k vkSj vf/lwpuk,a

Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India

(Other than the Ministry of Defence

dk£ed] yksd f'kdk;r rFkk isa'ku ea=kky;

(dk£ed vkSj izf'k{k.k foHkkx)

ubZ fnYyh] 6 iQjojh] 2017

dk-vk- 298-—dsUnz ljdkj] fnYyh fo'ks"k iqfyl LFkkiu vf/fu;e] 1946 (1946 dk vf/fu;e la- 25) dh /kjk 6 ds

lkFk ifBr /kjk 5 dh mi&/kjk (1) }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, gfj;k.kk ljdkj] x`g foHkkx] paMhx<+ ds fnukad

03-11-2016 ds vkns'k la- 20@03@2012&3 ,pthvkbZ (I) }kjk nh xbZ lgefr ls ,rn~}kjk o"kZ] 2016 iQjojh esa jkT; Hkj esa gq, ¯gld

vkj{k.k vkanksyu ds nkSjku pqYyS;kuk eksM+] jksgrd ij gfj Hkwfe izsl dks vkx yxkus vkSj ywVekj ls lacaf/r Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk 1860

(1860 dk vf/fu;e la- 45) dh /kjk 148] 149] 188] 285] 395] 427] 436] 452] 506 vkSj /kjk 25@54@59 ¹vFkkZr~ l'kL=k

vf/fu;e] 1959 dh /kjk 25 (1959 dk vf/fu;e la- 54)º vkSj lkoZtfud laifÙk uqdlkuh fuokj.k vf/fu;e] 1984 dh /kjk 3

ds varxZr fnukad 25-02-2016 dks iqfyl Fkkuk lkaiyk] ftyk jksgrd esa iathÑr ,iQvkbZvkj la- 84 dh tkap vkSj Åij mfYyf[kr

vijk/ksa ls lacaf/r iz;kl] nq"izsj.k rFkk "kM;a=k ds ekeys ds vUos"k.k ds laca/ esa vkSj blh nkSjku fd, x, fdUgha vU; vijk/ksa vFkok

blh rjg ds rF;ksa ls mn~Hkwr vijk/ksa ds laca/ esa fnYyh fo'ks"k iqfyl LFkkiu ds lnL;ksa dh 'kfDr;ksa ,oa {ks=kkf/dkj dk foLrkj

,rn~}kjk laiw.kZ gfj;k.kk jkT; ij djrh gSA

[iQk- la- 228@57@2016&,ohMh&II]

,l- ih- vkj- f=kikBh] voj lfpo

640 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 18, 2017/MAGHA 29, 1938

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS

(Department of Personnel and Training)

New Delhi, the 6th February, 2017

S.O. 298.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the

Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (Act No. 25 of 1946), the Central Government with the consent of the

State Government of Haryana, Home Department, Chandigarh vide Order No. 20/3/2012-3 HGI (I) dated 03.11.2016,

hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole of

the State of Haryana for investigation of FIR No. 84, dated 25.02.2016 under Sections 148, 149, 188, 285, 395, 427,

436, 452, 506 of the Indian Panel Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) and Sections 25/54/59 [i.e. Section 25 of the Arms

Act, 1959 (Act No. 54 of 1959)] and Section 3 of Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 registered in

Police Station Sampla, District Rohtak pertaining to the offences of arson & loot of Hari Bhomi Press at Chullyana

Mor, Rohtak during the State wide violent reservation agitation that took place in February, 2016 and attempts,

abetments and conspiracies in relation to or in connection with the offences mentioned above and any other offence or

offences committed in course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts.

[F. No. 228/57/2016-AVD-II]

S. P. R. TRIPATHI, Under Secy.

ubZ fnYyh] 6 iQjojh] 2017

dk-vk- 299-—dsUnz ljdkj] fnYyh fo'ks"k iqfyl LFkkiu vf/fu;e] 1946 (1946 dk vf/fu;e la- 25) dh /kjk 6 ds

lkFk ifBr /kjk 5 dh mi&/kjk (1) }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, gfj;k.kk ljdkj] x`g foHkkx] paMhx<+ ds fnukad

03-11-2016 ds vkns'k la- 20@03@2012&3 ,pthvkbZ (II) }kjk nh xbZ lgefr ls ,rn~}kjk o"kZ] 2016 iQjojh esa jkT; Hkj esa gq,

¯gld vkj{k.k vkanksyu ds nkSjku fnYyh jksM] jksgrd ij baMl ifCyd Ldwy dks vkx yxkus vkSj ywVekj ls lacaf/r Hkkjrh; naM

lafgrk 1860 (1860 dk vf/fu;e la- 45) dh /kjk 148] 149] 188] 285] 395] 427] 436] 452] 506 ds varxZr fnukad

26-02-2016 dks iqfyl Fkkuk vcZu ,LVsV esa iathÑr ,iQvkbZvkj la- 102 dh tkap vkSj Åij mfYyf[kr vijk/ksa ls lacaf/r iz;kl]

nq"izsj.k rFkk "kM;a=k ds ekeys ds vUos"k.k ds laca/ esa vkSj blh nkSjku fd, x, fdUgha vU; vijk/ksa vFkok blh rjg ds rF;ksa ls mn~Hkwr

vijk/ksa ds laca/ esa fnYyh fo'ks"k iqfyl LFkkiu ds lnL;ksa dh 'kfDr;ksa ,oa {ks=kkf/dkj dk foLrkj ,rn~}kjk laiw.kZ gfj;k.kk jkT; ij

djrh gSA

[iQk- la- 228@57@2016&,ohMh&II]

,l- ih- vkj- f=kikBh] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 6th February, 2017

S.O. 299.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the

Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (Act No. 25 of 1946), the Central Government with the consent of the

State Government of Haryana, Home Department, Chandigarh vide Order No. 20/3/2012-3 HGI (II) dated 03.11.2016,

hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole of

the State of Haryana for investigation of FIR No. 102, dated 26.02.2016 under Sections 148, 149, 188, 285, 395, 427,

436, 452, 506 of the Indian Panel Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) registered in Police Station Urban Estate pertaining

to the offences of arson & loot in Indus Public School at Delhi Road Rohtak during the State wide violent reservation

agitation that took place in February, 2016 and attempts, abetments and conspiracies in relation to or in connection with

the offences mentioned above and any other offence or offences committed in course of the same transaction or arising

out of the same facts.

[F. No. 228/57/2016-AVD-II]

S. P. R. TRIPATHI, Under Secy.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 18] 2017@ek?k 29] 1938

641

िव मंालय

(िवीय सेवाएं िवभाग

िवीय सेवाएं िवभाग

िवीय सेवाएं िवभाग )

नई दली, 30 जनवरी, 2017

dk-vk- 300-—भारतीय टेट बक (समनुषंगी बक) अिधिनयम, 1959 क धारा 25 क उप-धारा (1) के खंड (ख) 'ारा (द)

शि+य, का (योग करते .ए, के01ीय सरकार, एत2ारा, नीचे दी गई सारणी के कालम (2) म3 िविन5द6 7ि+य, के थान पर कालम (3)

म3 िविन5द6 7ि+य, को त9काल (भाव से और अगले आदेश, तक, उ+ सारणी के कालम (1) म3 िविन5द6 बक, म3 िनदेशक के पद पर

नािमत करती हैः-

म

सं.

बक का नाम

वतमान िनदेशक का नाम

तािवत ि का नाम

टेट बक आफ >ावणकोर

डॉ. जे. सदाकदुला

डॉ. जे. सदाकदुला, भूतपूवC Dे>ीय िनदेशक, भारतीय EरजवC

बक, बी-4, EरजवC बक टाफ FाटCस, पीएच रोड, कलपौक,

चेIई-600010

टेट बक आफ मैसूर

Kी मुरली राधाकृMणन

Kी मुरली राधाकृMणन, भूतपूवC Dे>ीय िनदेशक, आरबीआई,

111, वसंत िवहार, 85, नेिपयन सी रोड, मुNबई-400006

[फा.सं. 6/3/2011-बीओ-I]

Oानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव

MINISTRY OF FINANCE

(Department of Financial Services)

New Delhi, the 30th January, 2017

S.O. 300.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (b) of the sub-section (1) of Section 25 of The State

Bank of India (Subsidiary Banks) Act, 1959, the Central Government, hereby nominate the person specified in column

(3) of the table below as Director of Banks specified in column (1) thereof in place of the person specified in column

(2) of said Table, with immediate effect and until further orders:-

SI.

No.

Name of the Bank

Name of the Existing Director

Name of the Persons proposed

State

Bank

Travancore

Dr. J. Sadakkadulla

Dr. J. Sadakkadulla,

Former Regional Director,

Reserve Bank of India

B 4, Reserve Bank Staff Quarters, PH Road,

Kilpauk, Chennai-600 010.

State

Bank

Mysore

Shri Murli Radhakrishnan

Shri Murli Radhakrishnan, Former Regional

Director, RBI, 111, Vasant Vihar, 85,

Napean Sea Road, Mumbai-400 006.

[F. No. 6/3/2011-BO-I]

JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.

नई दली, 9 फरवरी, 2017

dk-vk- 301-—भारतीय EरजवC बक अिधिनयम, 1934 (1934 का 2) क धारा 9 क उप-धारा (1) 'ारा (द) शि+य, का

(योग करते .ए, के01ीय सरकार, एत2ारा, डॉ. (सI कुमार मोह0ती को उनक िनयुि+ क अिधसूचना क तारीख से चार वषC क

642 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 18, 2017/MAGHA 29, 1938

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

अविध के िलए अथवा अगले आदेश, तक, जो भी पहले हो, डॉ. एस. रामच0दर के थान पर भारतीय EरजवC बक के दिDणी थानीय बोडC

म3 अंशकािलक गैर-सरकारी सदय िनयु+ करती है।

[फा.सं. 1/2/2016-बीओ-I]

Oानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 9th February, 2017

S.O. 301.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 9 of the Reserve Bank of India

Act, 1934 (2 of 1934), The Central Government hereby appoints Dr. Prasanna Kumar Mohanty as part-time non official

Member on the Southern Local Board of Reserve Bank of India, for a period of four years from the date of notification

of his appointment or until further orders, whichever is earlier vice Dr. S. Ramachander.

[F.No.1/2/2016-BO-I]

JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.

नई दली, 9 फरवरी, 2017

dk-vk- 302-—भारतीय EरजवC बक अिधिनयम, 1934 (1934 का 2) क धारा 9 क उप-धारा (1) 'ारा (द) शि+य, का

(योग करते .ए, के01ीय सरकार, एत2ारा, Kी वलभ Vपचंद भंशाली को उनक िनयुि+ क अिधसूचना क तारीख से चार वषC क

अविध के िलए अथवा अगले आदेश, तक, जो भी पहले हो, (ो. महे01 Wसह सोधा के थान पर भारतीय EरजवC बक के पिXमी थानीय

बोडC म3 अंशकािलक गैर-सरकारी सदय िनयु+ करती है।

[फा.सं. 1/6/2016-बीओ-I]

Oानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 9th February, 2017

S.O. 302.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 9 of the Reserve Bank of India

Act, 1934 (2 of 1934), The Central Government hereby appoints Shri Vallabh Roopchand Bhanshali as part-time non

official Member on the Western Local Board of Reserve Bank of India, for a period of four years from the date of

notification of his appointment or until further orders, whichever is earlier vice Prof. Mahendra Singh Sodha.

[F.No. 1/6/2016-BO-I]

JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.

नई दली, 9 फरवरी, 2017

dk-vk- 303-—भारतीय EरजवC बक अिधिनयम, 1934 (1934 का 2) क धारा 8 क उप-धारा (1) के खZड (ग) 'ारा (द)

शि+य, का (योग करते .ए, के01ीय सरकार, एत2ारा, Kी राजीव कुमार (ज0म ितिथ: 06.07.1951) को उनक िनयुि+ क

अिधसूचना क तारीख से चार वषC क अविध के िलए अथवा अगले आदेश, तक, जो भी पहले हो, भारतीय EरजवC बक के के01ीय बोडC म3

अंशकािलक गैर-सरकारी िनदेशक नािमत करती है।

[फा.सं. 1/10/2016-बीओ-I]

Oानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 9th February, 2017

S.O. 303.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (c) of the sub-section (1) of Section 8 of the Reserve

Bank of India Act, 1934 (2 of 1934), the Central Government hereby nominates Shri Rajiv Kumar (DOB: 06.07.1951)

as Part Time Non Official Director on the Central Board of Reserve Bank of India for a period of four years from the

date of notification of his appointment, or until further orders, whichever is earlier.

[F.No. 1/10/2016-BO-I]

JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 18] 2017@ek?k 29] 1938

643

नई दली, 9 फरवरी, 2017

dk-vk- 304-—भारतीय EरजवC बक अिधिनयम, 1934 (1934 का 2) क धारा 9 क उप-धारा (1) 'ारा (द) शि+य, का

(योग करते .ए, के01ीय सरकार, एत2ारा, Kी सुनील िम>ा को उनक िनयुि+ क अिधसूचना क तारीख से चार वषC क अविध के िलए

अथवा अगले आदेश, तक, जो भी पहले हो, Kी पी. डी. िचतलांिगया के थान पर भारतीय EरजवC बक के पूव_ थानीय बोडC म3

अंशकािलक गैर-सरकारी सदय िनयु+ करती है।

[फा.सं. 1/11/2016-बीओ-I]

Oानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 9th February, 2017

S.O. 304.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 9 of the Reserve Bank of India

Act, 1934 (2 of 1934), The Central Government hereby appoints Shri Sunil Mitra as part-time non official Member on

the Eastern Local Board of Reserve Bank of India, for a period of four years from the date of notification of his

appointment or until further orders, whichever is earlier vice Shri P.D. Chitlangia.

[F.No. 1/11/2016-BO-I]

JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.

नई दली, 9 फरवरी, 2017

dk-vk- 305-—भारतीय EरजवC बक अिधिनयम, 1934 (1934 का 2) क धारा 8 क उप-धारा (1) के खZड (ग) 'ारा (द)

शि+य, का (योग करते .ए, के01ीय सरकार, एत2ारा, Kी अशोक गुलाटी (ज0म ितिथ: 11.05.1954) को उनक िनयुि+ क

अंशकािलक गैर-सरकारी िनदेशक नािमत करती है। उनक िनयुि+ इस शतC के अaयधीन होगी क वे भारतीय EरजवC बक के बोडC म3

शािमल होने से पहले आईडीएफसी बक िल. के बोडC से 9याग-प> द3गे।

[फा.सं. 1/15/2016-बीओ-I]

Oानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 9th February, 2017

S.O. 305.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (c) of the sub-section (1) of Section 8 of the Reserve

Bank of India Act, 1934 (2 of 1934), the Central Government hereby nominates Shri Ashok Gulati (DOB: 11.05.1954)

as Part Time Non Official Director on the Central Board of Reserve Bank of India for a period of four years from the

date of notification of his appointment, or until further orders, whichever is earlier subject to the condition that he will

resign from the Board of IDFC Bank Ltd. before joining the Board of Reserve Bank of India.

[F.No. 1/15/2016-BO-I]

JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.

नई दली, 9 फरवरी, 2017

dk-vk- 306-—भारतीय EरजवC बक अिधिनयम, 1934 (1934 का 2) क धारा 8 क उप-धारा (1) के खZड (ग) 'ारा (द)

शि+य, का (योग करते .ए, के01ीय सरकार, एत2ारा, Kी मनीष सभरवाल (ज0म ितिथ: 29.12.1969) को उनक िनयुि+ क

अंशकािलक गैर-सरकारी िनदेशक नािमत करती है।

[फा.सं. 1/16/2016-बीओ-I]

Oानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव

644 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 18, 2017/MAGHA 29, 1938

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 9th February, 2017

S.O. 306.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (c) of the sub-section (1) of Section 8 of the Reserve

Bank of India Act, 1934 (2 of 1934), the Central Government hereby nominates Shri Manish Sabharwal (DOB:

29.12.1969) as Part Time Non Official Director on the Central Board of Reserve Bank of India for a period of four

years from the date of notification of his appointment, or until further orders, whichever is earlier.

[F.No. 1/16/2016-BO-I]

JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.

नई दली, 16 फरवरी, 2017

dk-vk- 307-—जीवन बीमा िनगम अिधिनयम, 1956 (1956 का 31) क धारा 4 'ारा (द) शि+य, का (योग करते .ए,

के01ीय सरकार, एत2ारा, Kी हेम0त भागCव, (बंध िनदेशक (एमडी), भारतीय जीवन बीमा िनगम (एलआईसी) को 10 फरवरी, 2017

के अपराbन से उनक अिधवcषता क तारीख (31.07.2019) तक अथवा अगले आदेश, तक, जो भी पहले हो, उ+ िनगम का सदय

िनयु+ करती है।

[फा.सं. ए-15011/01/2014-बीमा-I]

एस. के. मोह0ती, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 16th February, 2017

S.O. 307.—In exercise of the powers conferred by section 4 of the Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956 (31

of 1956), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Hemant Bhargava, Managing Director (MD), Life Insurance

Corporation of India (LIC) as a Member of the said Corporation with effect from the afternoon of 10^th February, 2017

up to the date of his superannuation (31.07.2019), or until further orders, whichever is earlier.

[F. No. A-15011/01/2014-Ins.I]

S. K. MOHANTY, Under Secy.

fons'k ea=kky;

(lh-ih-oh- izHkkx)

ubZ fnYyh] 8 iQjojh] 2017

dk-vk- 308-—jktuf;d vkSj dksalqyh; vf/dkjh ('kiFk ,oa iQhl) ds vf/fu;e] 1948 (1948 dk 41) dh /kjk 2 ds

[akM (d) ds vuqlj.k esa oSèkkfud vkns'k A

,rn~}kjk] dsaæ ljdkj Hkkjr ds nwrkokl] tkxzsc esa Jh dqynhi efyd] lgk;d vuqHkkx vf/dkjh dks fnukad 8 iQjojh] 2017

ls lgk;d dksalqyj vf/dkjh ds rkSj ij dksalqyj lsokvksa ds fuoZgu ds fy, izkfèkd`r djrh gS A

¹la- Vh&4330@02@2017º

izdk'k pUn] mi lfpo (dksalqyj)

MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS

(CPV DIVISION)

New Delhi, the 8th February, 2017

S.O. 308.—Statutory Order in pursuance of clause (a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular

Officers (Oaths and Fees) Act, 1948 (41 of 1948), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Kuldeep Malik,

Assistant Section Officer as Assistant Consular Officer in the Embassy of India, Zagreb to perform the Consular

services with effect from 8th February, 2017.

[No. T-4330/02/2017]

PRAKASH CHAND, Dy. Secy. (Consular)

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 18] 2017@ek?k 29] 1938

645

नागर िवमानन मंालय

नई दली, 3 जनवरी, 2017

dk-vk- 309-—भारतीय िवमानप)न (ािधकरण अिधिनयम, 1994 (1994 क संdया 55) क धारा 3, 'ारा (द) शि+य,

का (योग करते .ए, के01ीय सरकार एत2ारा Kी इं1ाकांित नरिसNहा मूcत, कायCपालक िनदेशक, भारतीय िवमानप)न (ािधकरण को

सदय (संचालन), भारतीय िवमानप)न (ािधकरण के पद पर अनुसूची ‘ए’ तर के वेतनमान eपए 75000-100000/- म3 दनांक

23 नवNबर, 2016 के पूवाCbन से पांच वषC क अविध तक या उनक सेवािनवृि) क तारीख तक, या आगले आदेश तक, जो भी पहले

लागू हो, िनयु+ करती है।

[फा. सं. एवी-24011/8/2016-एएआई-एमओसीए]

पी. जे. थॉमस, अवर सिचव

MINISTRY OF CIVIL AVIATION

New Delhi, the 3rd January, 2017

S.O. 309.—In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 3 of the Airports Authority of India Act, 1994

(No.55 of 1994), the Central Government hereby appoint Shri Indrakanti Narasimha Murthy, Executive Director, AAI

as Member (Operations), Airports Authority of India in Schedule ‘A’ scale of pay of Rs.75000-100000/- with effect

from forenoon of 23^rd November, 2016 for a period of five years or till the date of his superannuation or until further

orders, whichever is the earliest.

[F. No. AV-24011/8/2016-AAI-MOCA]

P. J. THOMAS, Under Secy.

कोयला मंालय

नई दली, 14 फरवरी, 2017

का.आ.

का.आ. 310

310

310.—के01ीय सरकार को यह (तीत होता है क इसके उपाबf अनुसूची म3 वcणत पEरDे> क भूिम म3 से कोयला

अिभ(ाg होने क संभावना है ;

और उ+ अनुसूची म3 वcणत भूिम के Dे> म3 अंतcव6 करने वाला रेखांक संdयांक आर.ई.वी./15/16, तारीख 14 दसNबर, 2016

का िनरीDण स3iल कोलफjस िलिमटेड (भूिम और राजव िवभाग), दरभंगा हाउस, राँची – 834029 (झारखZड) के कायाCलय म3 या

महा(बंधक, स3iल कोलफjस िलिमटेड, मगध और आlपाली Dे>, िजला चतरा और लातेहार (झारखंड) के कायाCलय म3 या उपायु+,

िजला चतरा और लातेहार, झारखZड या महा(बंधक (खोज (भाग), आर.आई.-III, के01ीय खान योजना और िडजाईन संथान िलिमटेड,

ग,डवाना पैलेस, कांके रोड, राँची (झारखंड) के कायाCलय म3 या कोयला िनयं>क, 1, काउंिसल हाउस iीट, कोलकाता- 700001 के

कायाCलय म3 कया जा सकता है;

अतः, अब, के01ीय सरकार, कोयला धारक Dे> (अजCन और िवकास) अिधिनयम,1957 (1957 का 20) (िजसे इसम3 इसके पXात

उ+ अिधिनयम कहा गया है) क धारा 4 क उप-धारा (1) 'ारा (द) शि+य, का (योग करते .ए, उ+ अनुसूची म3 वcणत भूिम म3

कोयले का पूवnDण करने के अपने आशय क नोEटस देती है ।

उ+ अनुसूची म3 वcणत भूिम म3 िहतबf कोई 7ि+ –

(i)

संपूणC भूिम या उसके कसी भाग या ऐसी भूिम म3 या उसके ऊपर कसी अिधकार के अजCन पर आDेप कर सकेगा; या

(ii)

उ+ अिधिनयम क धारा 4 क उप-धारा (3) के अधीन क गई कारCवाई से .ई Dित या संभािवत Dित अिधिनयम क

धारा 6 के अधीन कसी नुकसानी के िलए (ितकर का दावा कर सकेगा; या

(iii)

उ+ अिधिनयम क धारा 13 क उप - धारा (1) के अधीन समाg हो गई पूवnDण अनुOिgय, के संबंध म3 या उ+

अिधिनयम क धारा 13 क उप- धारा (4) के अधीन समाg हो गये खनन पqे के िलए (ितकर का दावा कर सकेगा और

646 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 18, 2017/MAGHA 29, 1938

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

उ+ अिधिनयम क धारा 13 क उप-धारा (1) के खंड (i) से खंड (iv) म3 िविन5द6 मद, के संबंध म3 उपगत 7य को

उपदcशत करने के िलए उ+ भूिम से संबंिधत सभी मानिच>,, चाटr और अ0य दतावेज, को सुपुदC करेगा,

इस अिधसूचना के राजप> म3 (काशन क तारीख से नsबे दन, के भीतर महा(बंधक, स3iल कोलफjस िलिमटेड, मगध और

आlपाली Dे>, िजला चतरा और लातेहार ( झारखंड ) या महा(बंधक, स3iल कोल फjस िलिमटेड, भूिम और राजव िवभाग,

दरभंगा हाउस, राँची – 834029 (झारखZड) को सुपुदC करेगा ।

अनुसूची

संघिम>ा िववृत पEरयोजना

िजला चतरा और लातेहार (झारखंड)

(रेखांक संdयांक आरईवी /15/16, तारीख 14 दसNबर,2016)

sलॉक-क

uम

सं.

vाम

थाना

संdया

थाना

िजला

Dे>

Eटwपणयाँ

एकड़ म3

हेyटेयर म3

मनातु

बालुमाथ

लातेहार

14.00

5.665

भाग

बनवार

बालुमाथ

लातेहार

298.87

120.951

भाग

बनालात

बालुमाथ

लातेहार

131.98

53.411

भाग

चरा

बालुमाथ

लातेहार

95.03

38.458

भाग

कुरल,गा

टंडवा

चतरा

329.96

133.532

भाग

कुल:

869.84

352.017

sलॉक- ख

कुंडी

टंडवा

चतरा

49.30

19.951

भाग

सराधु

टंडवा

चतरा

120.55

48.786

भाग

कुल:

169.85

68.737

sलॉक-ग

सराधु

टंडवा

चतरा

321.73

130.202

भाग

कुल:

321.73

130.202

sलॉक-घ

कुरल,गा

टंडवा

चतरा

5.35

2.165

भाग

10.

सराधु

टंडवा

चतरा

98.95

40.045

भाग

11.

हेचबिलया

टंडवा

चतरा

41.99

16.993

भाग

कुल:

146.29

59.203

sलॉक-ड.

12.

होनहे

टंडवा

चतरा

49.95

20.214

भाग

कुल:

49.95

20.214

sलॉक: क + ख + ग + घ + ड. :

1557.66

एकड़

(लगभग)

630.373

हेyटेयर

(लगभग)

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 18] 2017@ek?k 29] 1938

647

सीमा वणन:

लॉक

लॉक-क

क-ख-ग

रेखा, िब0दु ‘क’ से आरंभ होती है और vाम मनातु, बनवार, चारा से गुजरती है और िब0दु ‘ग’ पर िमलती है ।

ग-घ-ड.-च-क

रेखा, िब0दु vाम चारा, बनालात, कुरल,गा, मनातु के भाग से आरंिभक िब0दु ‘क’ पर िमलती है ।

लॉक

लॉक –ख

छ-ज-झ-छ

रेखा, िब0दु ‘छ’ से आरंभ होती है और vाम कुरल,गा, कुंडी, सराधु भाग से गुजरती है और आरंिभक िब0दु ‘छ’ पर

िमलती है ।

लॉक

लॉक-ग

ञ –ट-ठ

रेखा, िब0दु ‘ञ’ से आरंभ होती है और vाम सराधु के भाग से गुजरती .ई और िब0दु ‘ठ’ पर िमलती है ।

ठ-ड-ञ

रेखा, vाम सराधु के भाग से गुजरती .ई और िब0दु ‘ञ’ पर िमलती है ।

लॉक

लॉक- घ

ढ-ण-त

रेखा, िब0दु ‘ढ’ से आरंभ होती है और vाम कुरल,गा सराधु के भाग से गुजरती .ई और िब0दु ‘त’ पर िमलती है ।

त-थ-ढ

रेखा, िब0दु vाम सराधु हेचाबिलया के भाग से और दुमुहानी रेखा से गुजरती .ई vाम कोयेद बरकुहे, कुरल,गा के

भाग से होकर और आरंिभक िब0दु ‘ढ’ पर िमलती है ।

लॉक

लॉक-ड.

ड.

द-ध-न

रेखा, िब0दु ‘द’ से आरंभ होती है और vाम नौिडहा, कोयेद, हो0हे से गुजरती .ई और आरंिभक िब0दु ‘द’ पर

िमलती है ।

[फा.सं. 43015/3/2017-एलए एZड आईआर]

सुजीत कुमार, अवर सिचव

MINISTRY OF COAL

New Delhi, the 14th February, 2017

S.O. 310.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that coal is likely to be obtained from the land in the

locality described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

And, whereas, the plan bearing number Rev/15/16, dated the 14^thDecember, 2016 containing details of the areas

of land described in the said Schedule may be inspected at the office of the Central Coalfields Limited (Land and

Revenue Department), Darbhanga House, Ranchi- 834029 (Jharkhand) or at the office of the General Manager, Central

Coalfields Limited, Magadh and Amrapali Area, District -Chatra and Latehar (Jharkhand), Deputy Commissioner,

District- Chatra and Latehar, Jharkhand or at the office of the General Manager (Exploration Division), RI- III, Central

Mine Planning and Design Institute Limited, Gondwana Palace, Kanke Road, Ranchi (Jharkhand) or at the office of the

Coal Controller, 1, Council House Street, Kolkata- 700 001;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas

(Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 (20 of 1957), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), the Central

Government hereby gives notice of its intention to prospect for coal in land described in the aforesaid Schedule.

Any person interested in the land described in the above mentioned Schedule may —

(i)

object to the acquisition of the whole or any part of the land or of any rights in or over the said land; or

(ii)

claim compensation under section 6 of the said Act for any damage caused or likely to be caused by any

action taken under sub-section (3) of section 4 thereof ; or

(iii) claim compensation under sub-section (1) of section 13 of the said Act in respect of prospecting license

ceasing to have effect or under sub-section (4) of section 13 of the said Act for mining lease ceasing to

have effect and deliver all maps, charts and other documents relating to the aforesaid land to show the

expenditure incurred in respect of items specified in clauses (i) to (iv) of sub-section (1) of section 13 of the

said Act,

to the office of the General Manager, Central Coalfields Limited, Magadh and Amrapali Area, District Chatra

and Latehar (Jharkhand) or General Manager, Central Coalfields Limited, Land and Revenue Department, Darbhanga

House, Ranchi- 834029 (Jharkhand) within a period of ninety days from the date of publication of this notification.

648 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 18, 2017/MAGHA 29, 1938

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

SCHEDULE

Sanghmitra Opencast Project

District- Chatra and Latehar, Jharkhand

(Plan bearing number REV/15/16, dated the 14^th December,2016)

Block- A

SL.

Number

Village

Thana

number

Thana

District

Area

Remarks

acres

hectares

Manatu

Balumath

Latehar

14.00

5.665

Part

Banwar

Balumath

Latehar

298.87

120.951

Part

Banalat

Balumath

Latehar

131.98

53.411

Part

Charra

Balumath

Latehar

95.03

38.458

Part

Kurlounga

Tandwa

Chatra

329.96

133.532

Part

Total:

869.84

352.017

Block-B

Kundi

Tandwa

Chatra

49.30

19.951

Part

Saradhu

Tandwa

Chatra

120.55

48.786

Part

Total:

169.85

68.737

Block-C

Saradhu

Tandwa

Chatra

321.73

130.202

Part

Total:

321.73

`130.202

Block-D

Kurlonga

Tandwa

Chatra

5.35

2.165

Part

10.

Saradhu

Tandwa

Chatra

98.95

40.045

Part

11.

Heckbalia

Tandwa

Chatra

41.99

16.993

Part

Total:

146.29

59.203

Block-E

12.

Honhe

Tandwa

Chatra

49.95

20.214

Part

Total:

49.95

20.214

Block : A+B+C+D+E :

1557.66

acres

(approxi-

mately)

630.373

hectares

(approxi-

mately)

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 18] 2017@ek?k 29] 1938

649

Boundary Description :

Block- A

A-B-C

Line starts from point ‘A’ passes through part village of Manatu, Banwar, Chara and meets

at point ‘C’.

C-D-E-F-A

Line passes through part village of Charra, Banalat, Kurlounga, Manatu and meets at

starting point ‘A’.

Block- B

G-H-I-G

Line starts from point ‘G’ passes through part village of Kurlounga , Kundi Saradhu,

Kurlaunga and meets at starting point ‘G’.

Block –C

J-K-L

Line starts from point ‘J’ passes through part village of Saradhu and meets at starting point

‘L’.

L-M-J

Line passes through part village of Saradhu and meets at point ‘J’.

Block-D

N-O-P

Line starts from point ‘N’ passes through part village of Kurlounga, Saradhu and meets at

point ‘P’.

P-Q-N

Line passes through part village of Saradhu Hechabalia, Centre line of Domuhani Nadi and

part village of Koed Bar kute , Kurlounga and meets at starting point ‘N’.

Block –E

R-S-T

Line start from point ‘R’ passes through part village of Naudiha, Koed, Honhe, and meets at

starting point ‘R’.

[F.No. 43015/3/2017-LA&IR]

SUJEET KUMAR, Under Secy.

नई दली, 14 फरवरी, 2017

का.आ.

का.आ. 311

311

311.—के01ीय सरकार को यह (तीत होता है क इसके उपाबf अनुसूची म3 वcणत पEरDे> क भूिम म3 से कोयला

अिभ(ाg होने क संभावना है;

और उ+ अनुसूची म3 वcणत भूिम के Dे> म3 अंतcव6 करने वाला रेखांक संdयांक आर.ई.वी./13/2016, तारीख 3 दसNबर, 2016

महा(बंधक, स3iल कोलफjस िलिमटेड, अरगडा Dे>, िजला हजारीबाग (झारखंड) के कायाCलय म3 या उपायु+, िजला हजारीबाग

(झारखZड) के कायाCलय म3 या महा(बंधक (खोज (भाग), आर.आई.-III, के01ीय खान योजना और िडजाईन संथान िलिमटेड, ग,डवाना

पैलेस, कांके रोड, राँची (झारखंड) के कायाCलय म3 या कोयला िनयं>क, 1, काउंिसल हाउस iीट, कोलकाता- 700001 के कायाCलय म3

कया जा सकता है;

कोयले का पूवnDण करने के अपने आशय क सूचना देती है ।

उ+ अनुसूची म3 वcणत भूिम म3 िहतबf कोई 7ि+ –

(i)

संपूणC भूिम या उसके कसी भाग या ऐसी भूिम म3 या उसके ऊपर कसी अिधकार के अजCन पर आDेप कर सकेगा; और

650 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 18, 2017/MAGHA 29, 1938

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(ii)

उ+ अिधिनयम क धारा 4 क उप-धारा (3) के अधीन क गई कारCवाई से .ई Dित

या संभािवत Dित अिधिनयम क

धारा 6 के अधीन कसी नुकसानी के िलए (ितकर का दावा कर सकेगा; और

(iii)

उ+ अिधिनयम क धारा 13 क उप - धारा (1) के अधीन समाg हो गई पूवnDण अनुOिgय, के संबंध म3 या उ+

उ+ अिधिनयम क धारा 13 क उप-धारा (1) के खंड (i) से खंड (iv) म3 िविन5द6 मद, के संबंध म3 उपगत 7य को

उपदcशत करने के िलए उ+ भूिम से संबंिधत सभी मानिच>,, सारिणय, और अ0य दतावेज, को सुपुदC करेगा,

इस अिधसूचना के राजप> म3 (काशन क तारीख से नsबे दन, के भीतर महा(बंधक, स3iल कोलफjस िलिमटेड, अरगडा

Dे>, िजला हजारीबाग ( झारखंड ) या महा(बंधक, स3iल कोलफjस िलिमटेड, (भूिम और राजव िवभाग), दरभंगा हाउस, राँची –

834029 (झारखZड) को सुपुदC करेगा ।

अनुसूची

चानो Eरकबा िववृत पEरयोजना

िजला हजारीबाग, झारखंड

(रेखांक संdयांक आरईवी /13/2016, तारीख 3 दसNबर,2016 )

u.सं.

vाम

थाना

संdया

िजला

Dे>

(एकड़ म3)

Dे>

(हेyटेयर

म3 )

Eटwपिणयां

खिपया

मांडू

हजारीबाग

615.32

249.02

भाग

कुरा

मांडू

हजारीबाग

628.24

254.24

भाग

Eरकबा

मांडू

हजारीबाग

433.85

175.58

भाग

कनक

मांडू

हजारीबाग

50.19

20.31

भाग

कुल: 1727.60

एकड़

(लगभग)

699.15

हेyटेयर

(लगभग)

सीमा

सीमा - वणन:

वणन:

क-ख-ग-घ

रेखा, िब0दु ‘क’ से आरंभ होती है और vाम कुरा, Eरकबा, खिपया तथा कनक के भाग से गुजरते .ए और िब0दु ‘घ’

पर िमलती है ।

घ-ड.-च

रेखा, vाम कनक तथा खिपया के भाग से गुजरते .ए और िब0दु ‘च’ पर िमलती है ।

च-छ-ज-झ

रेखा, vाम खिपया कुरा तथा Eरकबा के भाग से गुजरते .ए और िब0दु ‘झ’ पर िमलती है ।

झ- क

रेखा, vाम खिपया तथा कुरा के भाग से गुजरते .ए और (ारंिभक िब0दु ‘क’ पर िमलती है ।

[फा.सं. 43015/4/2017-एलए एZड आईआर]

सुजीत कुमार, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 14th February, 2017

S.O. 311.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that coal is likely to be obtained from the land in the

locality described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

And, whereas, the plan bearing number Rev/13/2016, dated the 3^rd December, 2016 containing details of the

areas of land described in the said Schedule may be inspected at the office of the Central Coalfields Limited (Land and

Revenue Department), Darbhanga House, Ranchi- 834029 (Jharkhand) or at the office of the General Manager, Central

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 18] 2017@ek?k 29] 1938

651

Coalfields Limited, Argada Area, District Hazaribagh (Jharkhand), or Deputy commissioner, District Hazaribagh,

(Jharkhand ), or at the office of the General Manager (Exploration Division), RI- III, Central Mine Planning and

Design Institute Limited, Gondwana Palace, Kanke Road, Ranchi (Jharkhand) or at the office of the Coal Controller, 1,

Council House Street, Kolkata- 700 001;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas

(Acquisition and Development), Act, 1957 (20 of 1957), hereinafter referred to as the said Act, the Central Government

hereby gives notice of its intention to prospect for coal in land described in the said Schedule.

Any person interested in the land described in the above mentioned Schedule may —

(i)

object to the acquisition of the whole or any part of the land, or of any rights in or over such land; or

(ii)

claim compensation under section 6 of the said Act for any damage caused or likely to be caused by any

action taken under sub-section (3) of section 4 of the said Act; or

(iii) claim compensation under sub-section (1) of section 13 of the said Act in respect of prospecting license

ceasing to have effect or under sub-section (4) of section 13 of the said Act for mining lease ceasing to

have effect and deliver all maps, charts and other documents relating to the aforesaid land to show the

expenditure incurred in respect of items specified in clauses (i) to (iv) of sub-section (1) of section 13 of the

said Act,

to the office of the General Manager, Central Coalfields Limited, Argada Area, District Hazaribagh (Jharkhand)

or General Manager, Central Coalfields Limited (Land and Revenue Department), Darbhanga House, Ranchi - 834029

(Jharkhand) within a period of ninety days from the date of publication of this notification.

SCHEDULE

Chano Rikba Opencast Project

District – Hazaribagh, Jharkhand

(Plan bearing number Rev/13/2016, dated the 3^rd December, 2016)

Boundary Description:

[F.No. 43015/4/2017-LA&IR]

SUJEET KUMAR, Under Secy.

Sl.

No.

Village

Thana

number

District

Area

(In acres)

Area

(in

hectares)

Rema

rks

Khapia

Mandu

Hazaribagh

615.32

249.02

Part

Kura

Mandu

Hazaribagh

628.24

254.24

Part

Rikba

Mandu

Hazaribagh

433.85

175.58

Part

Kanki

Mandu

Hazaribagh

50.19

20.31

Part

Total:

1727.60

acres

(approxi-

mately)

699.15

hectares

(approxi-

mately)

A-B-C-D

Line starts from point ‘A’ passes through part of the village Kura, Rikba, Khapia and

Kanki and meets at point ‘D’.

D-E-F

Line passes through part of village Kanki, Khapia and meets at point ‘F’.

F-G-H-I

Line passes through part of village Khapia, Kura, Rikba and meets at point ‘I’.

I-A

Line passes through part of village Khapia, Kura and meets at starting point ‘A’.

652 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 18, 2017/MAGHA 29, 1938

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

lapkj ea=kky;

(nwjlapkj foHkkx)

ubZ fnYyh] 8 iQjojh] 2017

dk-vk- 312-—dsUnzh; ljdkj] jktHkk"kk (la?k ds 'kkldh; iz;kstuksa ds fy, iz;ksx) fu;ekoyh] 1976 (;Fkk la'kksf/r] 1987] 2007

rFkk 2011) ds fu;e 10 (4) ds vuqlj.k esa] egkuxj VsfyiQksu fuxe fyfeVsM] eqacbZ] ftlesa 80 izfr'kr ls vf/d deZpkfj;ksa us ¯gnh dk

dk;Zlk/d Kku izkIr dj fy;k gS] dks ,rn~}kjk vfèklwfpr djrh gS %&

2- ;g vf/lwpuk Hkkjr ds jkti=k esa izdk'ku dh rkjh[k ls ykxw gksxh

¹la- bZ&11016@01@@2016& jktHkk"kkº

lq/s'k dqekj 'kkgh] mi egkfuns'kd (leUo; ,oa iz'kklu)

MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS

(Department of Telecommunications)

New Delhi, the 8th February, 2017

S.O. 312.—In pursuance of Rule 10(4) of the Official Languages (Use for Official Purposes of the Union) Rules,

1976 (as amended in 1987, 2007 and 2011), the Central Government hereby notifies the Mahanagar Telephone Nigam

Limited, Mumbai, where more than 80% of staff have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi :

2. This notification shall come into force from the date of its publication in the Official Gazette of India.

[No. E-11016/01/2016-O.L.]

S. K. SHAHI, Dy. Director General (C&A)

Je ,oa jkstxkj ea=kky;

ubZ fnYyh] 6 iQjojh] 2017

dk-vk- 313-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ

Hkkjrh; thou chek fuxe ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 03@2008) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh;

ljdkj dks 30-01-2017 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&17012@65@2007&vkbZvkj (,e)º

jkts'k dqekj] voj lfpo

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

New Delhi, the 6th February, 2017

S.O. 313.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 03/2008) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour

Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of M/s. Life Insurance Corporation of India and their workman, which was received by the Central

Government on 30.01.2017.

[No. L-17012/65/2007-IR (M)]

RAJESH KUMAR, Under Secy.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 18] 2017@ek?k 29] 1938

653

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 10^th January, 2017

Reference: (CGITA) No. 03/2008

The Sr. Divisional Manager,

LIC of India,

Divisional Office,

Jeevan Prakash, Tilak Road,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

…First Party

V/s

Shri Rajesh K. Datania,

C/o Lsuryoday Labour Union,

Opp. Rangila Chowky, Shahpur,

Ahmedabad(Gujarat)

…Second Party

For the First Party

Shri K.V. Gadhia

For the Second Party

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-17012/65/2007-

IR(M) dated 04.01.2008 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect

of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the termination of Sh. Rajesh K. Datania w.e.f. 05.05.2006 without paying termination benefit is just

and legal? If not, what relief the workman is entitled to?”

The reference dates back to 04.01.2008. Both the parties were served vide notice Ex. 2 to appear on 28.05.2008.

Acknowledgements of the notices Ex. 3 and 4 were received. The second party submitted the statement of claim Ex. 5

on 26.11.2009 and the first party submitted the written statement Ex. 8 on 05.08.2010. Since then the second party has

been absent to lead evidence, therefore, on 04.03.2011, fresh notice was issued to both the parties to appear on

19.05.2011 but to no result.

Thus it appears that the second party workman is not willing to prosecute the case.

Therefore, the reference is disposed of with the observation as under: “the termination of Sh. Rajesh K. Datania

w.e.f. 05.05.2006 without paying termination benefit is just and legal.”

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 6 iQjojh] 2017

dk-vk- 314-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ vks-

,u-th-lh- fyfeVsM ,oa vU; ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 38@2010) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks

dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 30-01-2017 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&30012@3@2009&vkbZvkj (,e)º

jkts'k dqekj] voj lfpo

654 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 18, 2017/MAGHA 29, 1938

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 6th February, 2017

S.O. 314.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 38/2010) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour

Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of M/s. ONGC Ltd. and other and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on

30.01.2017.

[No. L-30012/3/2009-IR (M)]

RAJESH KUMAR, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 9^th January, 2017

Reference: (CGITA) No. 38/2010

The Asset Manager,

ONGC Ltd., Ankleshwar Asset,

Ankleshwar (Gujarat)

M/s Nirmal Construction,

17, Vaishali Society,

Ankleshwar (Gujarat)

…First Party

V/s

Shri/Smt.BahttubenBalmikBagh,

At.Chauta Bazar, Bhatwad,

Ankleshwar,

Bharuch (Gujarat)

…Second Party

For the First Party

Shri K.V. Gadhia

For the Second Party

Shri/Smt. C.B. Godigajbar

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-30012/3/2009-

IR(M) dated 02.02.2010 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect

of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of M/s Nirmal Construction, Ankleshwar, Contractor of ONGC Ltd.,

Ankleshwar in terminating the services of Smt. BahttubenBalmikBagaw.e.f. 02.03.2009 is legal, proper and

just? To what relief the concerned workman is entitled?”

The reference dates back to 02.02.2010. The second party submitted the vakalatpatra Ex. 4 and statement of

claim Ex. 5 on 06.07.2010 along with list of documents Ex. 9 in the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad but no document

was annexed with the list. On transfer of the reference to this tribunal on 05.10.2011, the second party submitted the

affidavit on 24.11.2011 in pursuance to the notice issued to the party to appear.

Shri K.V. Gadhia Associates submitted the vakalatpra Ex. 10 on 03.12.2013 and written statement Ex. 11 on

24.04.2014 in this tribunal. Since then the second party has not been appearing to lead evidence.Thus it appears that the

second party is not willing to prosecute the case.

Therefore, the reference is disposed of in the absence of the statement of claim and evidence with the observation

as under: “the action of the management of M/s Nirmal Construction, Ankleshwar, Contractor of ONGC Ltd.,

Ankleshwar in terminating the services of Smt. BahttubenBalmikBagaw.e.f. 02.03.2009 is legal, proper and just.”

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 18] 2017@ek?k 29] 1938

655

ubZ fnYyh] 6 iQjojh] 2017

dk-vk- 315-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ

,;jiksVZ vFkkWfjVh vkWiQ bafM;k ,oa vU; ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd

fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 48@2010) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS]

tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 30-01-2017 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&11011@5@2009&vkbZvkj (,e)º

jkts'k dqekj] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 6th February, 2017

S.O. 315.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 48/2010) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour

Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of M/s. Airport Authority of India and other and their workman, which was received by the Central

Government on 30.01.2017.

[No. L-11011/5/2009-IR (M)]

RAJESH KUMAR, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 9^th January, 2017

Reference: (CGITA) No. 48/2010

1. The Airport Director,

Airport Authority of India,

S.V. Patel International Airport,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380003

2. The Regional Manager,

M/s Akbar Travels of India,

101, Crystal Arcade, Opp. Telephone Exchange Office,

C.G. Road, Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

3. M/s Akbar Travels of India Car Rental Service,

101, Crystal Arcade, Opp. Telephone Exchange Office,

C.G. Road, Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

4. M/s Benzy Enterprises,

101, Crystal Arcade, Opp. Telephone Exchange Office,

C.G. Road, Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

5. M/s Geoman,

Room No. 4, Ramji Mandir, Hasol, Sardarnagar,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

…First Party

V/s

The General Secretary,

Gujarat Kamdar Mandal, 402/403,

Shilp II, Nr. Sales India, Income Tax, Ashram Road,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

…Second Party

For the First Party No. 3& 4

Shri P.M. Thakkar Associates

656 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 18, 2017/MAGHA 29, 1938

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

For the First Party No.

Shri D.C. Gandhi Associates

For the Second Party

None

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-11011/5/2009-

IR(M) dated 18.03.2010 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect

of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the demand of Gujarat Kamdar Mandal Union for reinstatement of 58 Taxi Drivers w.e.f. 08.07.2008

(as per list enclosed) whose services have been terminated by M/s Akbar Travels of (I) Ltd., M/s Akbar Travels

of India Car Rental Service and its sister concern, M/s Benzy Enterprises and M/s Geoman is valid, reasonable

and just? If so, what relief the workmen are entitled to and from which date?”

The reference dates back to 18.03.2010. Both the parties submitted their vakalatpatra Ex. 6 and 7 on 27.07.2010

and 01.10.2010 respectively. Since then the second party has not submitted the statement of claim despite giving dozen

of opportunities and also last opportunity on 17.10.2010. Thus it appears that the second party is not willing to

prosecute the case.

Therefore, the reference is disposed of in the absence of the statement of claim and evidence with the observation

as under: “the demand of Gujarat Kamdar Mandal Union for reinstatement of 58 Taxi Drivers w.e.f. 08.07.2008 (as per

list enclosed) whose services have been terminated by M/s Akbar Travels of (I) Ltd., M/s Akbar Travels of India Car

Rental Service and its sister concern, M/s Benzy Enterprises and M/s Geoman is not legal, reasonable and just.”

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 6 iQjojh] 2017

dk-vk- 316-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ vks-

,u-th-lh- fyfeVsM ,oa vU; ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 75@2012) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks

dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 30-01-2017 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&30011@26@2011&vkbZvkj (,e)º

jkts'k dqekj] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 6th February, 2017

S.O. 316.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 75/2012) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour

Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of M/s. ONGC Ltd. and other and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on

30.01.2017.

[No. L-30011/26/2011-IR (M)]

RAJESH KUMAR, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 2^nd January, 2017

Reference: (CGITA) No. 75/2012

1. The Asset Manager,

ONGC Ltd., Ankleshwar Asset,

Ankleshwar

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 18] 2017@ek?k 29] 1938

657

2. M/s Tops Security Ltd.,

C-I, Hariome Shopping Centre,

Nr. Jubili Guest House,

Over Old National Highway,

Ankleshwar

…First Party

V/s

The General Secretary,

Gujarat Mazdoor Sabha,

104, Maharanapratap Complex,

Nr. V.S. Hospital, Ellisbridge,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

…Second Party

For the First Party

Shri K.V. Gadhia

For the Second Party

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-30011/26/2011-

IR(M) dated 18.04.2012 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect

of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the demand of the Gujarat Mazdoor Sabha that Shri Rajesh Kumar Ram Bahadur Yadav & 63 others

(List enclosed) were engaged by the management of ONGC Limited, Ankleshwar through the contractor M/s

Tops Security Ltd. in the prohibited category of employment vide notification dated 08.09.1994 is legal and

justified? If so, whether the action of the management of ONGC Limited by not giving regularization and equal

pay and all other allowances at par with the regular employees of ONGC to Shri Rajesh Kumar Ram Bahadur

Yadav & 63 others (List enclosed) are legal and justified? What relief the workmen are entitled to and to what

extent?”

The reference dates back to 18.04.2012. Some of the workmen detailed below:

Kishan Tiwari

ii.

Munna Nandkishor Chaudhari

iii.

Tausif Gulam Husen Shaikh

iv.

Rishikesh Rai

Ram Shumer Maurya

vi.

Javid gulam Husen Shaikh

vii.

Gulam Husen Yakub Malek

viii.

Magan Bhai Bechar Patel

ix.

Bhautik Kumar Natwar Patel

Malek Anwar Husen

xi.

Nkanaiyalal K. Patel

xii.

Chetan Kumar T. Patel

xiii.

Jayesh Kumar I Patel

xiv.

Sona Pati Thakor

xv.

Yogesh Devajibhai Patel

xvi.

Sanjay Ray Jibhai Patel

xvii.

Jitendra Kumar Sureshbhai Patel

xviii.

Sanjiv Kumar R. Rajput

xix.

Rathod Rajendrasinh J.

658 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 18, 2017/MAGHA 29, 1938

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

xx.

Jignesh Kumar C. Patel

xxi.

Ramanbhai N. Patel

xxii.

Aplesh Bhai A. Vasava

xxiii.

Mistry Hitesh Shantilal

xxiv.

Ranvir Sinh P. Rathod

xxv.

Gulam Rasul Yakub Malek

xxvi.

Arif A. Khilji

xxvii.

Sarfaraj I Malek

xxviii. Deep Prakash Kunwar

xxix.

Nikunj D. Patel

xxx.

Rameshbhai Khushal Patel

xxxi.

Ashok H. Pandey

xxxii.

Ajit K. Solanki

xxxiii. Arvind C. Parmar

xxxiv. Shantilal M. Bariya

xxxv.

Dharmendra A. Parmar

xxxvi. Mahesh B. Padhiyar

xxxvii. Rathod Mukesh Kumar

xxxviii. Mahendra Sing Chauhan

xxxix. Vikram U. Raj

xl.

Kamlesh Kumar Singh

Moved an application Ext. 9 through the General Secretary, ONG Mazdoor Sangh, for withdrawal of their name

from the reference as they have settled their disputes with the first party ONGC and M/s Tops Security Ltd.. The copy

of the settlement is also filed. Opposite party did not raise any objection, therefore, the application Ext. 9 was allowed

and the aforesaid names of the workmen were deleted from the reference as per the settlement. Rest of the 24 workmen

despite giving dozen of opportunities, prior to the withdrawal from the reference by the aforesaid workmen on

05.11.2015 and thereafter giving half a dozen opportunities for filing statement of claim, they did not submit the

statement of claim. Thus it appears that the rest of the workmen and their Union have no willingness to prosecute the

reference. Thus the reference is deserved to be disposed of in the absence of the statement of claim with the observation

as under: “the demand of the Gujarat Mazdoor Sabha that rest of the 24 workmen not named in the application and list

of withdrawal Ext.9 were engaged by the management of ONGC Limited, Ankleshwar through the contractor M/s

Tops Security Ltd. in the prohibited category of employment vide notification dated 08.09.1994 is not legal and

justified and the action of the management of ONGC Limited by not giving regularization and equal pay and all other

allowances at par with the regular employees of ONGC torest of the 24 workmen not named in the application and list

of withdrawal Ext.9 is legal and justified.”

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 6 iQjojh] 2017

dk-vk- 317-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ vks-

,u-th-lh- fyfeVsM ,oa vU; ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 207@2004) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks

dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 30-01-2017 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&30011@32@1999&vkbZvkj (,e)º

jkts'k dqekj] voj lfpo

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 18] 2017@ek?k 29] 1938

659

New Delhi, the 6th February, 2017

S.O. 317.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 207/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour

Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of M/s. ONGC Ltd. and other and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on

30.01.2017.

[No. L-30011/32/1999-IR (M)]

RAJESH KUMAR, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 10^th January, 2017

Reference: (CGITA) No. 207/2004

1. The Group General Manager,

ONGC Ltd., Avani Bhawan,

Chandkheda, Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

2. M/s. Industrial Security Services,

Parichay Shopping Centre, Near D Cabin,

Sabarmati, Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

3. M/s. Public Power Mazdoor Kamdar Sahakari Mandli Ltd.,

Opp. Dudhsagar Dairy, Highway Road,

Mehsana (Gujarat)

4. M/s. Lokpriya Labour & Majoor Co-op. Society Ltd.,

308, Karishma Complex, Stadium Circle, C.G. Road,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

5. M/s. Chandiodiya Mazdoor Kamdar Sahakari Mandli Ltd.,

179, Ambica Krupa, Ranip, Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

6. Rajdeep Group Mazdoor Kamdar Sahakari Mandli Ltd.,

Vedmata Society, IOC Road, Chandkheda,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

…First Party

V/s

The General Secretary,

Gujarat Petroleum Emp. Union,

434/46, Gandhivas, Koba Road, Sabarmati,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

…Second Party

For the First Party

Shri K.V. Gadhia

For the Second Party

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-30011/32/99-

IR(M) dated 11.06.1999 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect

of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the demand of the union for absorption/regularisation of Shri Maganbhai Dhurabhai Parmar and 45

other contract workers, by the management of ONGC Ltd., Ahmedabad is legal and justified? If so, to what relief

is the concerned workmen entitled and from which date?”

660 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 18, 2017/MAGHA 29, 1938

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

The reference dates back to 11.06.1999. The second party submitted the statement of claim Ex. 10 on 22.12.1999.

The first party submitted the written statement Ex. 22 on 17.07.2002.

27 workmen listed in the Ex. 34 out of 46 workmen moved the applications for withdrawal from the reference

and also for deleting their names from the reference, which was allowed by the tribunal on 14.05.2015, vide order Ex.

38.

The names of the workmen are as under:

Vyas Jitendra Vishnuprasad

ii.

Momin Ibrahimbhai Sulemanbhai

iii.

Patel Sureshkumar Narsinhbhai

iv.

Chavada Kalidas Amatharam

Paramr Maganbhai Dhulabhai

vi.

Parmar Khodabhai Jesangbhai

vii.

Paramr Kanubhai Somabhai

viii.

Parmar Pratapbhai Melabhai

ix.

Solanki Rameshbhai Gotabhai

Thakor Vishnuji Gandaji

xi.

Parmar Manojbhai Kantibhai

xii.

Jadav Chimanbhai Galabhai

xiii.

Chandrabhushan Singh

xiv.

Acharya Pareshkumar K.

xv.

Kesharkar Prakash Pundlik

xvi.

Patel Nikun Chhotalal

xvii.

Thakor Shambhuji Shivaji

xviii.

Thakor Rayajiji Shakaraji

xix.

Raval Papatji Juhaji

xx.

Thakor Jayantiji Kalaji

xxi.

Chavada Mahendrabhai A.

xxii.

Prajapati Lalabhai Mafatlal

xxiii.

Parmar Vitthalbhai Shankarbhai

xxiv.

Vaghela Shankarbhai Dhulabhai

xxv.

Gayakwad Saranpal Shripati

xxvi.

Dantani Manojkumar Jayantilal

xxvii.

Prajapati Gunvantbhai R.

The names of the aforesaid workmen were deleted and the case was listed for 30.06.2015 for evidence of the

remaining second party workmen. Since 30.06.2015, the remaining workmen as well as the Gujarat Petroleum

Employees Union representing the workman have been absent and failed to lead evidence. Thus it appears that the

remaining workmen are not willing to prosecute the case.

Therefore, the reference is disposed of with the observation as under with respect to the remaining 19 workmen:

“the demand of the union for absorption/regularisation of Shri Maganbhai Dhurabhai Parmar and 45 other contract

workers, by the management of ONGC Ltd., Ahmedabad is not legal and justified.”

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 18] 2017@ek?k 29] 1938

661

ubZ fnYyh] 6 iQjojh] 2017

dk-vk- 318-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ ts-,e-

lh- ekb¯ux ,.M Dokjh odZ fyfeVsM ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn

esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 923@2004) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks

dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 30-01-2017 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&29011@63@2003&vkbZvkj (,e)º

jkts'k dqekj] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 6th February, 2017

S.O. 318.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 923/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour

Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of M/s. JMC Mining & Quarry Works Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central

Government on 30.01.2017.

[No. L-29011/63/2003-IR (M)]

RAJESH KUMAR, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 4^th January, 2017

Reference: (CGITA) No. 923/2004

The Managing Director,

JMC Mining & Quarry Works Ltd.,

At & Post Taluka Thasra,

Kheda (Gujarat)

…First Party

V/s

Shri Bhanuprasad Ramdas Sadhu,

C/o

Akhil Gujarat General Mazdoor Sangh,

2^nd Floor, Arab Manzir,

Patharkuva, Relief Road,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

…Second Party

For the First Party

For the Second Party

Shri V.K. Kazi

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-29011/63/2003-

IR(M) dated 27.02.2004 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect

of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of Managing Director, JMC Mining & Quarry Works Ltd., Distt. Kheda

in terminating services of Sh. Bhanuprasad Ramdas, Sadhu w.e.f. 09.06.2001 without paying any retrenchment

compensation or one months’ notice or noice pay in lieu thereof is justified or legal? If not to what relief the

workman is entitled to?”

662 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 18, 2017/MAGHA 29, 1938

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

The reference dates back to 27.02.2004. The second party submitted his statement of claim Ext. 4 on 21.04.2005

alleging that he joined the services of first party employer, JMC Mining & Quarry Works Ltd., here and after referred

to as first party on 09.11.1994 as clerk. He was allotted the clerical work in the first party store department. Later he

was transferred to despatch department. The duties which were to be performed by the workman was to take the

measurement of the trucks ready for the lodging of materials, to prepare the various challan as required and also to

prepare the daily reports of the despatches. His working hours are fixed from 08:00 AM to 08:00 PM in the first shift

and from 08:00 PM to 08:00 AM. Thus he used to perform 12 hours duty in a day. He was used to be paid Rs. 3000/-

per month. On 09.06.2001, newly appointed manager of the first party N.C. Patel suddenly terminated his services

without giving any reason or written order. He used to perform his duty faithfully and diligently. The said action of

termination without assigning any reason and also without giving any written order was against the standing orders and

also in violation of the Section 25 F, G & H of the Industrial Disputes Act. The work he used to perform is still exists

and the newly recruited persons have been doing the said jobs. Thus he has prayed for reinstatement with back wages.

This reference was originally registered with Industrial Tribunal, Nadiad on 27.02.2004, same was transferred to

this tribunal vide Order No. Z-22019/6/2007-IR(C-II) dated 19.10.2010 of Ministry of Labour & Employment, New

Delhi and the first party was informed vide notice Ext. 23 on 24.02.2011 to appear on 23.03.2011 but the notice

received unserved. Therefore, the matter was ordered to proceed ex-parte. The second party workman submitted his

affidavit Ext. 21 in support of his statement of claim reiterating the averments made therein. In his affidavit, he has

stated that he was appointed on 09.12.1993 and worked till 06.06.2001 for more than 240 days in each year. Thus in the

absence of the rebuttal of the first party, the reference deserves to be allowed and the question raised in the reference is

decided as under:

The action of the management of Managing Director, JMC Mining & Quarry Works Ltd., Distt. Kheda in

terminating services of Sh. Bhanuprasad Ramdas, Sadhu w.e.f. 09.06.2001 without paying any retrenchment

compensation or one months’ notice or noice pay in lieu thereof is unjustified or illegal.

The first party is directed to reinstate the second party workman within 60 days of the publication of this award

and to pay Rs. 50000/- as compensation.

The award is passed accordingly.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 6 iQjojh] 2017

dk-vk- 319-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ

dk.Myk MkWd yscj cksMZ ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 1035@2004) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh;

ljdkj dks 30-01-2017 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&37012@11@1996&vkbZvkj (,e)º

jkts'k dqekj] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 6th February, 2017

S.O. 319.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 1035/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour

Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of M/s. Kandla Dock Labour Board and their workman, which was received by the Central Government

on 30.01.2017.

[No. L-37012/11/1996-IR (M)]

RAJESH KUMAR, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 2^nd January, 2017

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 18] 2017@ek?k 29] 1938

663

Reference: (CGITA) No. 1035/2004

The Dy. Chaimman,

Kandla Dock Labour Board,

Shramdeep, Kandla Port,

Kandla

…First Party

V/s

The General Secretary,

Transport and Dock Workers Union,

Room No. 21, Yogesh Building, Plot No. 586,

Ward 12-C, Gandhidham,

Kutch (Gujarat) – 370201

…Second Party

For the First Party

Shri K.V. Gadhia

For the Second Party

Shri P.M. Vora

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-37012/11/96-

IR(M) dated 17.01.1997 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect

of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the demand of the Transport & Dock Workers Union, Gandhidham against the management of Kandla

Dock Labour Board, Kandla, that Shri Mansukhlal Gancha, Driver (Motor) should be upgraded, with

retrospective effect as per the recommendations of the Wage Revision Committee and orders of Government

regarding up-gradation of post, just valid and legal? If so to what benefits the workman is entitled for and what

directions are necessary in the matter?”

The reference dates back to 17.01.1997. The second party submitted the statement of claim Ext. 2 on 08.07.1997

and the first party submitted the written statement Ext. 4 on 01.07.2003. Since then the second party has not submitted

his evidence. However today on 02.01.2017, the workman’s Union and workman have not pressed the reference and

also requested to withdraw the reference.

Thus the reference is disposed of as not pressed.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 6 iQjojh] 2017

dk-vk- 320-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ

bf.M;u vkW;y dkiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM ,oa vU; ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd

fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] dkuiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 101@2014) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks

dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 30-01-2017 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&30012@10@2014&vkbZvkj (,e)º

jkts'k dqekj] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 6th February, 2017

S.O. 320.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 101/2014) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour

Court, Kanpur now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of M/s. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government

on 30.01.2017.

[No. L-30012/10/2014-IR (M)]

RAJESH KUMAR, Under Secy.

664 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 18, 2017/MAGHA 29, 1938

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SRI SHUBHENDRA KUMAR, HJS PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOR COURT/LOK ADALAT, KANPUR

Industrial Dispute No. 101 of 2014

Between :

Sh. Yogesh Sharma S/o Sh.Radha Raman Sharma

Village Bhagwanpura,

Post Ading

Distt. Mathura (UP)

Mathura

And

The Executive Director,

Indian Oil Corp. Ltd,

Mathura Refinery,

Mathura-281005

AWARD

Central Government Mol, vide notification no.L-30012/10/2014-IR(M) Dated 28.08.2014, has referred the

following dispute for adjudication to This Tribunal.

Whether the action of the management of Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Mathura Refinery, Mathura M/S.

G.S.Travels, Mathura in terminating the Services of Sh. Yogesh Shrma S/o Sh. Radha Raman Sharma workman w.e.f.

July, 2008 is just, fair & legal? If not, what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?

In the instant case a reference was referred to Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labor Court, Kanpur,

whereupon notice to the claimant was issued under registered post by CGIT Kanpur for filling his claim in the case.

On 16.12.2016, when the case was taken up neither the workman turned up nor filed his claim statement despite

availing of sufficient opportunities. Therefore, it appears that the worker is not interested in prosecuting his claim

before this tribunal. As such having no option left with the tribunal except to give an award in the case against the

worker for want of pleadings and proof.

For the reason given above, award is passed against the worker holding that the worker is not entitled to any

relief pursuant to the present Reference order for want of pleadings and proof.

Reference is answered accordingly against the worker.

SHUBHENDRA KUMAR, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 6 iQjojh] 2017

dk-vk- 321-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ

bf.M;u vkW;y dkiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM ,oa vU; ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd

fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] dkuiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 104@2014) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks

dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 30-01-2017 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&30012@11@2014&vkbZvkj (,e)º

jkts'k dqekj] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 6th February, 2017

S.O. 321.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 104/2014) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour

Court, Kanpur now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of M/s. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government

on 30.01.2017.

[No. L-30012/11/2014-IR (M)]

RAJESH KUMAR, Under Secy.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 18] 2017@ek?k 29] 1938

665

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SRI SHUBHENDRA KUMAR, HJS PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOR COURT/LOK ADALAT, KANPUR

Industrial Dispute No. 104 of 2014

Between :

Shri Ram Narayan Singh S/o Sh. Roop Singh

Village & Post Baad,

Distt. Mathura (UP)

MATHURA.

And

The Executive Director,

Indian Oil Corp. Ltd,

Mathura Refinery,

Mathura-281005

AWARD

Central Government Mol, vide notification no.L-30012/11/2014-IR(M) Dated 27.08.2014, has referred the

following dispute for adjudication to This Tribunal.

Whether the action of the management of Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Mathura Refinery, Mathura M/S Balaji

Services, New Delhi in terminating the Services of Sh. Ram Narayan Singh S/o Sh. Roop Singh workman w.e.f. April,

2010 is just, fair & legal? If not, what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?

In the instant case a reference was referred to Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labor Court, Kanpur,

whereupon notice to the claimant was issued under registered post by CGIT Kanpur for filling his claim in the case.

On 16.12.2016, when the case was taken up neither the workman turned up nor filed his claim statement despite

availing of sufficient opportunities. Therefore, it appears that the worker is not interested in prosecuting his claim

before this tribunal. As such having no option left with the tribunal except to give an award in the case against the

worker for want of pleadings and proof.

For the reason given above, award is passed against the worker holding that the worker is not entitled to any

relief pursuant to the present Reference order for want of pleadings and proof.

Reference is answered accordingly against the worker.

SHUBHENDRA KUMAR, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 6 iQjojh] 2017

dk-vk- 322-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ

bf.M;u vkW;y dkiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM ,oa vU; ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd

fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] dkuiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 105@2014) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks

dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 30-01-2017 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&30012@9@2014&vkbZvkj (,e)º

jkts'k dqekj] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 6th February, 2017

S.O. 322.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 105/2014) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour

Court, Kanpur now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of M/s. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government

on 30.01.2017.

[No. L-30012/9/2014-IR (M)]

RAJESH KUMAR, Under Secy.

666 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 18, 2017/MAGHA 29, 1938

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SRI SHUBHENDRA KUMAR, HJS PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOR COURT/LOK ADALAT, KANPUR

Industrial Dispute No. 105 of 2014

Between :

Shri Ranvir Singh S/o Sh. Kharag Singh

Village Jhandipur,

Post Farah,

Distt. Mathura (UP)

MATHURA.

And

The Executive Director,

Indian Oil Corp. Ltd,

Mathura Refinery,

Mathura-281005

AWARD

Central Government Mol, vide notification no.L-30012/9/2014-IR(M) Dated 28.08.2014, has referred the

following dispute for adjudication to This Tribunal.

Whether the action of the management of Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Mathura Refinery, Mathura M/S. Manish

Contractor, Mathura in terminating the Services of Sh. Ranveer Singh S/o Sh. Kharag Singh workman w.e.f. August,

2013 is just, fair & legal? If not, what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?

In the instant case a reference was referred to Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labor Court, Kanpur,

whereupon notice to the claimant was issued under registered post by CGIT Kanpur for filling his claim in the case.

On 16.12.2016, when the case was taken up neither the workman turned up nor filed his claim statement despite

availing of sufficient opportunities. Therefore, it appears that the worker is not interested in prosecuting his claim

before this tribunal. As such having no option left with the tribunal except to give an award in the case against the

worker for want of pleadings and proof.

For the reason given above, award is passed against the worker holding that the worker is not entitled to any

relief pursuant to the present Reference order for want of pleadings and proof.

Reference is answered accordingly against the worker.

SHUBHENDRA KUMAR, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 6 iQjojh] 2017

dk-vk- 323-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ

bf.M;u vkW;y dkiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM ,oa vU; ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd

fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] dkuiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 106@2014) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks

dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 30-01-2017 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&30012@8@2014&vkbZvkj (,e)º

jkts'k dqekj] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 6th February, 2017

S.O. 323.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 106/2014) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour

Court, Kanpur now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of M/s. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government

on 30.01.2017.

[No. L-30012/8/2014-IR (M)]

RAJESH KUMAR, Under Secy.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 18] 2017@ek?k 29] 1938

667

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SRI SHUBHENDRA KUMAR, HJS PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOR COURT/LOK ADALAT, KANPUR

Industrial Dispute No. 106 of 2014

Between :

Sh. Vinod Kumar S/o Sh. Hakam Singh

51/702, Laxmi Nagar Bagicha,

Jamun Paar,

Distt. Mathura (UP)

MATHURA.

And

The Executive Director,

Indian Oil Corp. Ltd,

Mathura Refinery,

Mathura-281005

AWARD

Central Government Mol, vide notification no.L-30012/8/2014-IR(M) Dated 28.08.2014, has referred the

following dispute for adjudication to This Tribunal.

Whether the action of the management of Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Mathura Refinery, Mathura M/S Balaji

Services, New Delhi in terminating the Services of Sh. Vinod Kumar S/o Sh. Hakim Singh workman w.e.f. March,

2010 is just, fair & legal? If not, what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?

In the instant case a reference was referred to Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labor Court, Kanpur,

whereupon notice to the claimant was issued under registered post by CGIT Kanpur for filling his claim in the case.

On 16.12.2016, when the case was taken up neither the workman turned up nor filed his claim statement despite

availing of sufficient opportunities. Therefore, it appears that the worker is not interested in prosecuting his claim

before this tribunal. As such having no option left with the tribunal except to give an award in the case against the

worker for want of pleadings and proof.

For the reason given above, award is passed against the worker holding that the worker is not entitled to any

relief pursuant to the present Reference order for want of pleadings and proof.

Reference is answered accordingly against the worker.

SHUBHENDRA KUMAR, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 6 iQjojh] 2017

dk-vk- 324-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ v#.k

m|ksx ,oa vU; ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] Hkqous'oj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 25@2009) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

30-01-2017 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&43012@7@2009&vkbZvkj (,e)º

jkts'k dqekj] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 6th February, 2017

S.O. 324.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 25/2009) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour

Court, Bhubaneswar now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of M/s. Arun Udyoga and others and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on

30.01.2017.

[No. L-43012/7/2009-IR (M)]

RAJESH KUMAR, Under Secy.

668 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 18, 2017/MAGHA 29, 1938

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, BHUBANESWAR

Present:

Shri B.C. Rath,

Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-cum-Labour

Court, Bhubaneswar.

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 25/2009

Date of Passing Award – 9^th December, 2016

Between :

1. M/s. Arun Udyoga,

Contractor of Ostpal Chromite Mines of

M/s. FACOR, Po. Kansa, Ps. Tamaka,

Dist. Jajpur.

2. The Chief Executive (Mines),

M/s. FACOR Limited, Kuans,

Bhadrak.

…1^st Party-Managements.

(And)

Shri Keshab Mohanta,

At. Ostia, Po. Chingudipal,

P.S. Tamaka, Dist. Jajpur

…2^nd Party-Workman.

Appearances:

Shri D.R. Mohapatra

…

For the 1^st Party-Management No. 1.

Shri P.K. Sahoo, Law Officer

…

For the 1^st Party-Management No. 2.

None

…

For the 2^nd Party-Workman.

AWARD

The award is directed against a reference with following schedule:-

“Whether the action of management of M/s. Arun Udyoga, Contractor of Ostpal Chromite Mines, M/s. FACOR

Ltd., in terminating the services of Shri Keshab Mohanta, Heavy Vehicle Driver w.e.f. 1.4.2007 is legal and/or

justified? What relief the workman is entitled to?”

made by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d)

of Sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 vide letter No.

L-43012/7/2009 – IR(M), dated 23.06.2009.

The disputant workman filed his claim statement alleging that he was appointed as a Tipper Driver from the year

2003 in the establishment of Management No. 1 and he was running the Tipper in the Mine area of the Management

No. 2. When he raised a demand before the Management to provide him better medical facility and pay structure the

Management did not allow him to discharge his duty from April, 2007 onwards. Hence he has made a prayer for his

reinstatement with all back wages and service benefits.

In their common written statements both the Managements have taken a stand that the disputant workman was

not given any appointment to work in any capacity in the Mines of the Management No. 2 and as such, submitted for

dismissal of the claim.

Though issues like (1) whether the action of the management of M/s. Arun Udyoga, Contractor of Ostpal

Chromite Mines, M/s. FACOR Ltd., in terminating the services of Shri Keshab Mohanta, Heavy Vehicle Driver w.e.f.

1.4.2007 is legal and/or justified? (2) what relief the workman is entitled to? were settled on the aforesaid pleadings of

the parties and the case was posted for taking evidence of the parties, the workman did not turn up to adduce his

evidence whereupon, the Management was heard exparte on the reference.

Though a pleading has been advanced on behalf of the workman that being appointed as a Tipper Driver by the

Management No. 1 he was running the Tipper in the mines of the Management No. 2, neither any oral or documentary

evidence is led before the Tribunal in support of such pleading to enable this Tribunal to find out if any relationship of

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 18] 2017@ek?k 29] 1938

669

employer and employee exists between the parties and to adjudicate the dispute. Law is well settled that initial burden

lies on the workman to prove the existence of relationship of employer and employee between the parties in order to

avail any relief under the provisions of the I.D. Act. Having failed to prove his employment or engagement either under

the Management No. 1 or 2 by giving any credible evidence, the workman is not entitled to the reliefs claimed by him.

Accordingly the reference is answered.

Dictated & Corrected by me.

B. C. RATH, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 6 iQjojh] 2017

dk-vk- 325-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ v#.k

m|ksx ,oa vU; ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] Hkqous'oj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 26@2009) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

30-01-2017 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&43012@6@2009&vkbZvkj (,e)º

jkts'k dqekj] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 6th February, 2017

S.O. 325.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 26/2009) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour

Court, Bhubaneswar now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of M/s. Arun Udyoga and others and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on

30.01.2017.

[No. L-43012/6/2009-IR (M)]

RAJESH KUMAR, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, BHUBANESWAR

Present:

Shri B.C. Rath,

Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-cum-Labour

Court, Bhubaneswar.

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 26/2009

Date of Passing Award – 9^th December, 2016

Between :

1. M/s. Arun Udyoga,

Contractor of Ostpal Chromite Mines of

M/s. FACOR, Po. Kansa, Ps. Tamaka,

Dist. Jajpur.

2. The Chief Executive (Mines),

M/s. FACOR Limited, Kuans,

Bhadrak.

…1^st Party-Managements

(And)

Shri Harihar Mohanta,

At. Ostia, Po. Chingudipal,

P.S. Tamaka, Dist. Jajpur

…2^nd Party-Workman

Appearances:

Shri D.R. Mohapatra

…

For the 1^st Party-Management No. 1.

670 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 18, 2017/MAGHA 29, 1938

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Shri P.K. Sahoo, Law Officer

…

For the 1^st Party-Management No. 2.

None

…

For the 2^nd Party-Workman.

AWARD

The award is directed against a reference with following schedule:-

“Whether the action of management of M/s. Arun Udyoga, Contractor of Ostpal Chromite Mines, M/s. FACOR

Ltd., in terminating the services of Shri Harihar Mohanta, Heavy Vehicle Driver w.e.f. 1.4.2007 is legal and/or

justified? What relief the workman is entitled to?”

made by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d)

of Sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 vide letter No. L-

43012/6/2009 – IR(M), dated 22.06.2009.

The disputant workman filed his claim statement alleging that he was appointed as a Tipper Driver from the year

2003 in the establishment of Management No. 1 and he was running the Tipper in the Mine area of the Management

No. 2. When he raised a demand before the Management to provide him better medical facility and pay structure the

Management did not allow him to discharge his duty from April, 2007 onwards. Hence he has made a prayer for his

reinstatement with all back wages and service benefits.

In their common written statements both the Managements have taken a stand that the disputant workman was

not given any appointment to work in any capacity in the Mines of the Management No. 2 and as such, submitted for

dismissal of the claim.

Though issues like (1) whether the action of the management of M/s. Arun Udyoga, Contractor of Ostpal

Chromite Mines, M/s. FACOR Ltd., in terminating the services of Shri Harihar Mohanta, Heavy Vehicle Driver w.e.f.