930 GI/2017

(1035)

jftLVªh la

(,u) 04@0007@2003µ05

REGD. No. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05

izkf/dkj ls izdkf'kr

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

lkIrkfgd

WEEKLY

]

ubZ fnYyh]

iQjojh

26—

ekpZ

] 201

] 'kfuokj@

iQkYxqu

—

iQkYxqu

] 1938

No. 9]

NEW DELHI, FEBRUARY 26—MARCH 4, 2017, SATURDAY/PHALGUNA 7—PHALGUNA 13, 1938

bl Hkkx esa fHkUu i`"B la[;k nh tkrh gS ftlls fd ;g i`Fkd ladyu ds :i esa j[kk tk lds

Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

Hkkx

II—

[k.M 3—

i&[k.M (

)

PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)

Hkkjr ljdkj ds ea=kky;ksa (j{kk ea=kky; dks NksM+dj) }kjk tkjh fd, x, lkafof/d vkns'k vkSj vf/lwpuk,a

Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India

(Other than the Ministry of Defence

गृह मंत्रालय

नई ददल् ली, 20 फरवरी, 2017

का.आ. 483.—केन्‍द रीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के ललए प्रयोग) लनयम, 1976 (यथा

संशोलधत, 1987) के लनयम 10 के उप-लनयम (4) के अनुसरण में, गृह मंत्रालय के लनम् नलललखत कायालय में लहन्‍द दी का

कायलसाधक ज्ञान रखने वाले कमलचाररयों की संख् या 80% से अलधक हो जाने के फलस् वरूपप इस कायालयों को एतद्द्वारा

अलधसूलचत करती है:-

1. भारत लतब् बत सीमा पुललस बल

1. उप महालनरीक्षक, क्षेत्रीय मुख् यालय (ल्रूगूग)), भा.लत.सी. पुललस बल मोहनबाडी, लजला-ल्रूगूग)

(असम) – 786012

2. उप महालनरीक्षक, आर.टी. सी. करैरा, भा.लत.सी. पुललस बल लजला-लशवपुरी (मध् य प्रदेश) – 473662

3. उप महालनरीक्षक, माउन्‍द टेन राइाइंवग स् कूल, अल् मोडा भा.लत.सी. पुललस बल लबमोला कैम् प, पत्रालय-कोसी, लजला -

अल् मोडा, उत्तराखं् – 243643

1036 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA MARCH 4, 2017/PHALGUNA 13, 1938

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

4. उप महालनरीक्षक,लसग् नल ट्रेंनग स् कूल, लशवपुरी भा.लत.सी. पुललस बल, पत्रालय/लजला-लशवपुरी (मध् य प्रदेश)

- 473551

5. उप महालनरीक्षक, सी.टी.सी. अलवर, भा.लत.सी. पुललस बल, गांव-बेरावास,पत्रालय-सह्ोली, लजला-अलवर

राजस् थान-131028

6. महालनरीक्षक (लचदकत् सा), रेफरल लचदकत् सालय, भा.लत.सी. पुललस बल, पत्रालय-सूरजपुर, लजला-गौतमबुद्ध नगर,

उत्तर प्रदेश-201306

7. सेनानी, 27वीं वालहनी, भा.लत.सी. पुललस बल, पत्रालय-नूरानाद सैनेटोररयम, नूरानाद, लजला-अलाप् पुझा (केरल)-

690671

8. सेनानी, 50वीं वालहनी, भा.लत.सी. पुललस बल, पत्रालय-सैक् टर 26, लजला-पंचकुला, हररयाणा-134116

9. सेनानी, 54वीं वालहनी, भा.लत.सी. पुललस बल, पत्रालय-हापोली (जीरो) लजला-सुबालन्‍दसरर, अरुणाचल प्रदेश

-791120

2. सीमा सुरक्षा बल पुललस

1. सेक् टर मुख् यालय, सीमा सुरक्षा बल, रायगंज, पररसर करनाजोडा, पोस् ट-करनाजोडा, लजला-उत्तर दीनाजपुर

(पलिम बंगाल) लपन-733130

2. 183वीं वालहनी सीमा सुरक्षा बल, स् थान-पलतराम, पोस् ट-अन्‍द नाई, लजला-दलक्षण दीनाजपुर (पलिम बंगाल)

लपन-733158

[सं. 12017/01/2012-लहन्‍द दी]

सहेली घोष रॉय, संयुक् त सलचव

MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS

New Delhi, the 20th February, 2017

S.O. 483.—In pursuance of sub rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (Use for official purposes of the

Union) Rules, 1976 (as amended in 1987) the Central Government hereby notifies the following office of the Ministry

of Home Affairs, wherein the percentage of the staff, having working knowledge of Hindi has gone above 80% .

1. Indo-Tibetan Border Police

1. Dy. Inspector General, Regional Hqrs (Dibrugarh), ITBP Mohanbari, Distt-Dibrugarh (Assam) – 786012

2. Dy. Inspector General, RTC Karera, ITBP, Distt-Shivpuri (M.P.) – 473662

3. Dy. Inspector General, Mountian Driving School, Almora ITBP Bimola Camp, PO-Kosi, Distt-Almora,

Uttarkhand – 243643

4. Dy. Inspector General, Signal Training School, Shivpuri ITBP, PO/Distt-Shivpuri (M.P.) – 473551

5. Dy. Inspector General, CTC Alwar, ITBP, Vill-Berawas PO-Sahdoli, Distt-Alwar, Rajasthan – 131028

6. The Inspector General (Medical), ITBP Referral Hospital, ITBP PO-Surajpur, Distt-Gautam Budh Nagar,

Uttar Pradesh – 201306

7. The Commandant, 27^th Battalion, ITBP, PO-Nooranand, Sanatorium Nooranand, Distt-Alappuzha, Kerala

– 690671

8. The Commandant, 50th Battalion, ITBP, PO Sector – 26 Distt-Panchkulla, Haryana – 134116

9. The Commandant, 54th Battalion, ITBP, PO – Hapoli (Zero) Distt – Subhansiri, Arunachal Pradesh – 791120

2. Border Security Force Police

1. Sector Hqrs., BSF Raiganj, Complex Karnajora, PO-Karnajora Distt-North Dinajapur, West Bengal,

Pin-733130

2. 183 Battalion, BSF, Place – Patiram, PO – Annai, Distt-South Dinajpur West Bengal – 733158

[No. 12017/01/2012-Hindi]

SAHELI GHOSH ROY, Jt. Secy.

(ii)

1037

लवत्त मंत्रालय

(लवत्तीय सेवाएं लवभाग)

नई ददल् ली, 16 फरवरी, 2017

का.आ. 484.— राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक (प्रबंध एवं प्रकीणल उपबंध) स्कीम, 1970/1980 के खं् 3 के उपखं् (1) और खण््

8 के उप-खं् (1) के साथ परित, बैंककारी कंपनी (उपक्रमों का अजलन एवं अंतरण) अलधलनयम, 1970/1980 की धारा 9 की

उपधारा (3) के खं् (क) द्वारा प्रदत्त शलियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्‍दरीय सरकार, एतद्द्वारा, बैंक आफ बडौदा के महाप्रबंधक

श्री नीलम दामोदरन (जन्‍दम लतलथ 24.11.1959) को पदभार ग्रहण करने की तारीख से 30.11.2019 तक अथालत उनकी

अलधवर्षषता की तारीख तक अथवा अगले आदेशों तक, जो भी पहले हो, बैंक आफ इंल्या में कायलपालक लनदेशक लनयुि

करती है।

[फा. सं. 4/5(1)/2016-बीओ-I]

ज्ञानोतोष राय, अवर सलचव

MINISTRY OF FINANCE

(Department of Financial Services)

New Delhi, the 16th February, 2017

S.O. 484.— In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (a) of sub-section (3) of Section 9 of The Banking

Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970/1980 read with sub clause (1) of clause 3 and sub

clause (1) of clause 8 of The Nationalized Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970/1980, the

Central Government hereby appoints Shri Neelam Damodharan (DOB: 24.11.1959), GM, Bank of Baroda as Executive

Director in Bank of India for a period upto 30.11.2019 ie. the date of his superannuation w.e.f. the date of his taking

over charge of the post or until further orders, whichever is earlier.

[F. No. 4/5(1)/2016-BO-I]

JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.

नई ददल् ली, 16 फरवरी, 2017

का.आ. 485.— राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक (प्रबंध एवं प्रकीणल उपबंध) स्कीम, 1970/1980 के खं् 3 के उपखं् (1) और खण््

उपधारा (3) के खं् (क) द्वारा प्रदत्त शलियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्‍दरीय सरकार, एतद्द्वारा, इलण््यन ओवरसीज बैंक के

महाप्रबंधक श्री के. स्वामीनाथन (जन्‍दम लतलथ 30.07.1962) को पदभार ग्रहण करने की तारीख से तीन वषल की अवलध के

ललए अथवा अगले आदेशों तक, जो भी पहले हो, इलण््यन ओवरसीज बैंक में कायलपालक लनदेशक लनयुि करती है।

[फा. सं. 4/5( 2)/2016-बीओ-I]

ज्ञानोतोष राय, अवर सलचव

New Delhi, the 16th February, 2017

S.O. 485.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (a) of sub-section (3) of Section 9 of The Banking

Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970/1980 read with sub clause (1) of clause 3 and sub

clause (1) of clause 8 of The Nationalized Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970/1980, the

Central Government hereby appoints Shri K. Swaminathan (DOB: 30.07.1962), GM, Indian Overseas Bank as

Executive Director in Indian Overseas Bank for a period of 3 years w.e.f. the date of his taking over charge of the post

or until further orders, whichever is earlier.

[F. No. 4/5( 2 )/2016-BO-I]

JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.

1038 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA MARCH 4, 2017/PHALGUNA 13, 1938

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

नई ददल् ली, 16 फरवरी, 2017

का.आ. 486.— राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक (प्रबंध एवं प्रकीणल उपबंध) स्कीम, 1970/1980 के खं् 3 के उपखं् (1) और खण््

उपधारा (3) के खं् (क) द्वारा प्रदत्त शलियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्‍दरीय सरकार, एतद्द्वारा, स्टेट बैंक आफ बीकानेर एं्

जयपुर के मुख्य महाप्रबंधक श्री अशोक कुमार प्रधान (जन्‍दम लतलथ 08.05.1960) को पदभार ग्रहण करने की तारीख से तीन

वषल की अवलध के ललए अथवा अगले आदेशों तक, जो भी पहले हो, युनाइटे् बैंक आफ इंल्या में कायलपालक लनदेशक लनयुि

करती है।

[फा. सं. 4/5(3)/2016-बीओ-I]

ज्ञानोतोष राय, अवर सलचव

New Delhi, the 16th February, 2017

S.O. 486.— In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (a) of sub-section (3) of Section 9 of The Banking

Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970/1980 read with sub clause (1) of clause 3 and sub

clause (1) of clause 8 of The Nationalized Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970/1980, the

Central Government hereby appoints Shri Ashok Kumar Pradhan (DOB: 08.05.1960), GGM, State Bank of Bikaner &

Jaipur as Executive Director in United Bank of India for a period of 3 years w.e.f. the date of his taking over charge of

the post or until further orders, whichever is earlier.

[F. No. 4/5(3)/2016-BO-I]

JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.

नई ददल् ली, 16 फरवरी, 2017

का.आ. 487.— राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक (प्रबंध एवं प्रकीणल उपबंध) स्कीम, 1970/1980 के खं् 3 के उपखं् (1) और खण््

उपधारा (3) के खं् (क) द्वारा प्रदत्त शलियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्‍दरीय सरकार, एतद्द्वारा, लवजया बैंक के महाप्रबंधक

श्री अतनु कुमार दास (जन्‍दम लतलथ 10.06.1963) को पदभार ग्रहण करने की तारीख से तीन वषल की अवलध के ललए अथवा

अगले आदेशों तक, जो भी पहले हो, बैंक आफ इंल्या में कायलपालक लनदेशक लनयुि करती है।

[फा. सं. 4/5(4 )/2016-बीओ-I]

ज्ञानोतोष राय, अवर सलचव

New Delhi, the 16th February, 2017

S.O. 487.— In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (a) of sub-section (3) of Section 9 of The Banking

Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970/1980 read with sub clause (1) of clause 3 and sub

clause (1) of clause 8 of The Nationalized Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970/1980, the

Central Government hereby appoints Shri Atanu Kumar Das (DOB: 10.06.1963), GM, Vijaya Bank as Executive

Director in Bank of India for a period of 3 years w.e.f. the date of his taking over charge of the post or until further

orders, whichever is earlier.

[F. No. 4/5(4)/2016-BO-I]

JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.

नई ददल् ली, 16 फरवरी, 2017

का.आ. 488.— राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक (प्रबंध एवं प्रकीणल उपबंध) स्कीम, 1970/1980 के खं् 3 के उपखं् (1) और खण््

उपधारा (3) के खं् (क) द्वारा प्रदत्त शलियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्‍दरीय सरकार, एतद्द्वारा, इलाहाबाद बैंक के महाप्रबंधक

श्री पी. रमण मूर्षत (जन्‍दम लतलथ 16.05.1964) को पदभार ग्रहण करने की तारीख से तीन वषल की अवलध के ललए अथवा

अगले आदेशों तक, जो भी पहले हो, सेन्‍दट्रल बैंक आफ इंल्या में कायलपालक लनदेशक लनयुि करती है।

[फा. सं. 4/5(5 )/2016-बीओ-I]

ज्ञानोतोष राय, अवर सलचव

(ii)

1039

New Delhi, the 16th February, 2017

S.O. 488.— In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (a) of sub-section (3) of Section 9 of The Banking

Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970/1980 read with sub clause (1) of clause 3 and sub

clause (1) of clause 8 of The Nationalized Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970/1980, the

Central Government hereby appoints Shri P. Ramana Murthy (DOB: 16.05.1964), GM, Allahabad Bank as Executive

Director in Central Bank of India for a period of 3 years w.e.f. the date of his taking over charge of the post or until

further orders, whichever is earlier.

[F. No. 4/5(5)/2016-BO-I]

JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.

नई ददल् ली, 16 फरवरी, 2017

का.आ. 489.— राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक (प्रबंध एवं प्रकीणल उपबंध) स्कीम, 1970/1980 के खं् 3 के उपखं् (1) और खण््

उपधारा (3) के खं् (क) द्वारा प्रदत्त शलियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्‍दरीय सरकार, एतद्द्वारा, कापोरेशन बैंक के महाप्रबंधक

श्री फरीद अहमद (जन्‍दम लतलथ 16.07.1960) को पदभार ग्रहण करने की तारीख से तीन वषल की अवलध के ललए अथवा

अगले आदेशों तक, जो भी पहले हो, पंजाब एं् ंसध बैंक में कायलपालक लनदेशक लनयुि करती है।

[फा. सं. 4/5(6 )/2016-बीओ-I]

ज्ञानोतोष राय, अवर सलचव

New Delhi, the 16th February, 2017

S.O. 489.— In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (a) of sub-section (3) of Section 9 of The Banking

Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970/1980 read with sub clause (1) of clause 3 and sub

clause (1) of clause 8 of The Nationalized Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970/1980, the

Central Government hereby appoints Shri Fareed Ahmed (DOB:16.07.1960), GM, Corporation Bank as Executive

Director in Punjab & Sind Bank for a period of 3 years w.e.f. the date of his taking over charge of the post or until

further orders, whichever is earlier.

[F. No. 4/5(6)/2016-BO-I]

JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.

नई ददल् ली, 16 फरवरी, 2017

का.आ. 490.— राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक (प्रबंध एवं प्रकीणल उपबंध) स्कीम, 1970/1980 के खं् 3 के उपखं् (1) और खण््

उपधारा (3) के खं् (क) द्वारा प्रदत्त शलियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्‍दरीय सरकार, एतद्द्वारा, स्टेट बैंक आफ मैसूर के मुख्य

महाप्रबंधक श्री एम.के. भट्टाचायल (जन्‍दम लतलथ 14.11.1960) को पदभार ग्रहण करने की तारीख से तीन वषल की अवलध के

ललए अथवा अगले आदेशों तक, जो भी पहले हो, इंल्यन बैंक में कायलपालक लनदेशक लनयुि करती है।

[फा. सं. 4/5(7 )/2016-बीओ-I]

ज्ञानोतोष राय, अवर सलचव

New Delhi, the 16th February, 2017

S.O. 490.— In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (a) of sub-section (3) of Section 9 of The Banking

Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970/1980 read with sub clause (1) of clause 3 and sub

clause (1) of clause 8 of The Nationalized Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970/1980, the

Central Government hereby appoints Shri M.K. Bhattacharya (DOB: 14.11.1960), CGM, State Bank of Mysore as

Executive Director, Indian Bank for a period of 3 years w.e.f. the date of his taking over charge of the post or until

further orders, whichever is earlier.

[F. No. 4/5(7)/2016-BO-I]

JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.

1040 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA MARCH 4, 2017/PHALGUNA 13, 1938

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

नई ददल् ली, 16 फरवरी, 2017

का.आ. 491.— राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक (प्रबंध एवं प्रकीणल उपबंध) स्कीम, 1970/1980 के खं् 3 के उपखं् (1) और खण््

उपधारा (3) के खं् (क) द्वारा प्रदत्त शलियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्‍दरीय सरकार, एतद्द्वारा, स्टेट बैंक आफ त्रावणकोर के

मुख्य महाप्रबंधक श्री एस. हररशंकर (जन्‍दम लतलथ 19.05.1961) को पदभार ग्रहण करने की तारीख से तीन वषल की अवलध

के ललए अथवा अगले आदेशों तक, जो भी पहले हो, इलाहाबाद बैंक में कायलपालक लनदेशक लनयुि करती है।

[फा. सं. 4/5(8)/2016-बीओ-I]

ज्ञानोतोष राय, अवर सलचव

New Delhi, the 16th February, 2017

S.O. 491.— In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (a) of sub-section (3) of Section 9 of The Banking

Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970/1980 read with sub clause (1) of clause 3 and sub

clause (1) of clause 8 of The Nationalized Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970/1980, the

Central Government hereby appoints Shri S. Harisankar (DOB: 19.05.1961), CGM, State Bank of Travancore as

Executive Director in Allahabad Bank for a period of 3 years w.e.f. the date of his taking over charge of the post or

until further orders, whichever is earlier.

[F. No. 4/5(8)/2016-BO-I]

JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.

नई ददल् ली, 16 फरवरी, 2017

का.आ. 492.— राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक (प्रबंध एवं प्रकीणल उपबंध) स्कीम, 1970/1980 के खं् 3 के उपखं् (1) और खं्

(5) के साथ परित, बैंककारी कंपनी (उपक्रमों का अजलन एवं अंतरण) अलधलनयम, 1970/1980 की धारा 9 की उपधारा (3)

के खं् (ज) द्वारा प्रदत्त शलियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्‍दरीय सरकार, भारतीय ररजवल बैंक से परामशल करने के पिात,

एतद्द्वारा, श्री सुनील मेहता (जन्‍दम लतलथ 22.08.1957) को उनकी लनयुलि की अलधसूचना की तारीख से तीन वषल की अवलध

के ललए अथवा अगले आदेशों तक, जो भी पहले हो, पंजाब नैशनल बैंक में अंशकाललक गैर-सरकारी लनदेशक के साथ-साथ

गैर-कायलकारी अध्यक्ष लनयुि करती है। यह लनयुलि इस शतल के अध्यधीन होगी दक उन्‍दहें पंजाब नैशनल बैंक के बो्ल में

कायलभार ग्रहण करने से पहले भारतीय स्टेट बैंक के बो्ल से त्याग-पत्र देना होगा।

[फा. सं. 4/7/2016-बीओ-I]

ज्ञानोतोष राय, अवर सलचव

New Delhi, the 16th February, 2017

S.O. 492.— In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (h) of sub-section (3) of Section 9 of The Banking

Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970/1980 read with sub-clause (1) of clause 3 & clause 5

of The Nationalized Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970/1980, the Central Government,

after consultation with the Reserve Bank of India, hereby appoints Shri Sunil Mehta (DOB: 22.08.1957) as Part Time

Non-official Director as well as Non-Executive Chairman in Punjab National Bank for a period of three years from the

date of notification of his appointment or until further orders, whichever is earlier. Subject to the condition that he will

be required to resign from the Board of State Bank of India before joining on the Board of Punjab National Bank.

[F. No. 4/7/2016-BO-I]

JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.

नई ददल् ली, 16 फरवरी, 2017

का.आ. 493.— राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक (प्रबंध एवं प्रकीणल उपबंध) स्कीम, 1970/1980 के खं् 3 के उपखं् (1) और खं्

(ii)

1041

एतद्द्वारा, श्री टी.सी.ए. रंगनाथन (जन्‍दम लतलथ 19.11.1953) को उनकी लनयुलि की अलधसूचना की तारीख से तीन वषल की

अवलध के ललए अथवा अगले आदेशों तक, जो भी पहले हो, इलण््यन ओवरसीज बैंक में अंशकाललक गैर-सरकारी लनदेशक के

साथ-साथ गैर-कायलकारी अध्यक्ष लनयुि करती है।

[फा. सं. 4/9/2016-बीओ-I]

ज्ञानोतोष राय, अवर सलचव

New Delhi, the 16th February, 2017

S.O. 493.— In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (h) of sub-section (3) of Section 9 of The Banking

Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970/1980 read with sub-clause (1) of clause 3 & clause 5

of The Nationalized Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970/1980, the Central Government,

after consultation with the Reserve Bank of India, hereby appoints Shri T C A Ranganathan (DOB: 19.11.1953) as

Part-Time Non-official director as well as Non-Executive Chairman in Indian Overseas Bank for a period of three years

from the date of notification of his appointment or until further orders, whichever is earlier.

[F. No. 4/9/2016-BO-I]

JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.

नई ददल् ली, 20 फरवरी, 2017

का.आ. 494.— बैंककारी लवलनयमन अलधलनयम, 1949 (1949 का 10) की धारा 53 द्वारा प्रदत्त शलियों का

प्रयोग करते हुए, भारत सरकार, भारतीय ररजवल बैंक की अनुशंसा पर एतद्द्वारा, यह घोषणा करती है दक उि अलधलनयम की

धारा 10 की उप-धारा (1) के खण्् (ग) के उप-खण्् (i) के उपबंध आन्‍दरा बैंक पर लागू नहीं होंगे, जहां तक इसका संबंध

बैंक के प्रबंध लनदेशक एवं मुख्य कायलकारी अलधकारी श्री सुरेश एन. पटेल को बैंकसल इंस्टीट्यूट आफ रूपरल ्ेवलपमेंट

(बीआईआर्ी) के शासी पररषद के सदस्य के रूपप में नालमत करने से है।

[फा. सं. 13/27/2013-बीओ-I]

ज्ञानोतोष राय, अवर सलचव

New Delhi, the 20th February, 2017

S.O. 494.— In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 53 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (10 of

1949), the Government of India on the recommendations of the Reserve Bank of India, hereby declare that the

provisions of sub-clauses (i) of clause (c) of sub-section (1) of Section 10 of the said Act shall not apply to Andhra

Bank in so far as it relates to the nomination of Shri Suresh N. Patel, MD&CEO, Andhra Bank as Member of

Governing Council of Bankers Institute of Rural Development (BIRD).

[F. No. 13/27/2013-BO-I]

JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.

नई ददल् ली, 27 फरवरी, 2017

का.आ. 495.—केन्‍द रीय सरकार, बैंककारी कंपनी (उपक्रमों का अजलन और अंतरण) अलधलनयम, 1970 (1970 का

5) की धारा 3 की उप-धारा (2क) द्वारा प्रदत्त शलियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, भारतीय ररजवल बैंक से परामशल के पश् चात्,

एतदद्वारा, इलण््यन ओवरसीज बैंक की प्रालधकृत पूंजी को तीन हजार करोड रुपए से ब)ाकर दस हजार करोड रुपए करती

है।

[फा. सं. 11/4/2009-बीओए]

लशवेन्‍द र चतुवेदी, अवर सलचव

New Delhi, the 27th February, 2017

S.O. 495.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2A) of Section 3 of the Banking Companies

(Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970, (5 of 1970), the Central Government, after consultation with the

Reserve Bank of India, hereby increases the authorized capital of the Indian Overseas Bank from three thousand crores

rupees to ten thousand crores rupees.

[F. No. 11/4/2009-BOA]

SHIVENDRA CHATURVEDI, Under Secy.

1042 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA MARCH 4, 2017/PHALGUNA 13, 1938

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

fons'k ea=kky;

(lh

izHkkx)

ubZ fnYyh]

tuojh

] 2017

496

-—

jktuf;d vkSj dksalqyh; vf/dkjh ('kiFk ,oa iQhl) ds vf/fu;e] 1948

dh /kjk 2 ds [akM (d) ds

vuqlj.k esa oSèkkfud vkns'k A

,rn~}kjk] dsaæ ljdkj Hkkjr ds iz/ku dksalykokl] nqcbZ esa Jh eqds

dqekj] lgk;d vuqHkkx vf/dkjh dks fnukad

31 tuojh]

2017

ls lgk;d dksalqyj vf/dkjh ds rkSj ij dksalqyj lsokvksa ds fuoZgu ds fy, izkfèk

d`r djrh gS A

¹la

Vh&4330@

1@201

izdk'k pUn] mi lfpo (dksalqyj)

MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS

(CPV DIVISION)

New Delhi, the 31st January, 2017

S.O. 496.—Statutory Order in pursuance of clause (a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular

Officers (Oaths and Fees) Act, 1948 (41 of 1948), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Mukesh Kumar,

Assistant Section Officer as Assistant Consular Officer in Consulate General of India, Dubai to perform the Consular

services with effect from 31 January, 2017.

[No. T-4330/01/2016]

PRAKASH CHAND, Dy. Secy. (Consular)

uo lalk/u fodkl ea=kky;

(mPprj f

k{kk foHkkx)

(राजभाषा प्रभाग)

ubZ fnYyh]

iQjojh

] 2017

का.आ. 497

-— केन्‍द रीय सरकारज राजभाषा (संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के ललए प्रयोग) लनयमज 1976 के लनयम 10

के उप लनयम 4 के अनुसरण मेंज मानव संसाधन लवकास मंत्रालय (स् कूल लशक्षा एवं साक्षरता लवभाग) के अंतगलत लनम् नलललखत

कायालयों कोज ऐसे कायालयों के रूपप मेंज लजनके 80 प्रलतशत से अलधक कमलचारी-वृन्‍द द ने लहन्‍द दी का कायलसाधक ज्ञान प्राप् त

कर ललया हैज अलधसूलचत करती है :-

1 जवाहर नवोदय लवद्यालय अंजाव, अरूपणाचल प्रदेश – 792102

2 जवाहर नवोदय लवद्यालय गोलाघाट, असम – 785621

3 जवाहर नवोदय लवद्यालय मोरीगांव, असम – 782105

4 जवाहर नवोदय लवद्यालय चुराचांदपुर, मलणपुर – 795128

5 जवाहर नवोदय लवद्यालय लॉगतलाई, लमजोरम – 796891

6 जवाहर नवोदय लवद्यालय लुंगलेई, लमजोरम – 796691

7 जवाहर नवोदय लवद्यालय कोलालसब, लमजोरम – 796075

8 जवाहर नवोदय लवद्यालय जांजगीर चंपा, छत् तीसग) - 495661

9 जवाहर नवोदय लवद्यालय कोररया, छत् तीसग) – 497335

(ii)

1043

10 जवाहर नवोदय लवद्यालय सुकमा, छत् तीसग) – 494111

11 जवाहर नवोदय लवद्यालय अलीराजपुर, मध् य प्रदेश – 457887

12 जवाहर नवोदय लवद्यालय उज् जैन – II, मध् य प्रदेश – 456335

13 जवाहर नवोदय लवद्यालय अंगुल, ओल्शा – 759106

14 जवाहर नवोदय लवद्यालय गजपलत, ओल्शा - 761201

15 जवाहर नवोदय लवद्यालय जग तंसहपुर, ओल्शा – 754140

16 जवाहर नवोदय लवद्यालय जाजपुर, ओल्शा – 755043

17 जवाहर नवोदय लवद्यालय झारसुगु्ा, ओल्शा – 768202

18 जवाहर नवोदय लवद्यालय कोरापुट, ओल्शा – 764021

19 केन्‍द रीय लवद्यालय, कवरत् ती,

)

लक्षद्वीप संघ शालसत प्रदेश

(

– 682555

20 केन्‍द रीय लवद्यालय, श्रावस् ती लभनगा, श्रावस् ती (उत् तर प्रदेश) – 271831

21 केन्‍द रीय लवद्यालय, लशवग), लशवग) पैलेस, रायबरेली (उत् तर प्रदेश) – 229308

22 केन्‍द रीय लवद्यालय, हरदोई,

)

राजकीय इंटर कॉलेज पररसर

(

, घंटाघर रो्, हरदोई (उत् तर प्रदेश) – 102442

[सं.11011-3/2016-रा.भा.ए.]

सुखबीर ंसह संधु, संयुक् त सलचव

MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT

(Department of Higher Education)

(O.L. UNIT)

New Delhi, the 17th February, 2017

S.O. 497—In pursuance of sub-rule (4) of rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for Official Purposes of the

Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government hereby notifies the following offices under the Ministry of Human

Resource Development, (Department of School Education & Literacy) as office, whose more than 80% members of the

staff have acquired working knowledge of Hindi :-

Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya Anjaw, Arunachal Pradesh - 792102

Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya Golaghat, Assam - 785621

Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya Morigoan, Assam - 782105

Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya Churachandpur, Manipur - 795128

Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya Lawngtlai, Mizoram - 796891

Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya Lunglei, Mizoram - 796691

Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya Kolasib, Mizoram - 796075

Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh – 495661

1044 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA MARCH 4, 2017/PHALGUNA 13, 1938

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya Koria, Chhattisgarh – 497335

10.

Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya Sukma, Chhattisgarh – 494111

11.

Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya Alirajpur, Madhya Pradesh – 457887

12.

Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya Ujjain- II, Madhya Pradesh – 456335

13.

Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya Angul, Odisha – 759106

14.

Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya Gajapati, Odisha – 761201

15.

Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya Jagatsinghpur, Odisha – 754140

16.

Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya Jajpur, Odisha – 755043

17.

Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya Jharsuguda, Odisha – 768202

18.

Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya Koraput, Odisha – 764021

19.

Kendriya Vidyalaya, Kavaratti, (U.T. of Lakshadweep) - 682555

20.

Kendriya Vidyalaya, Shrawasti Bhinga, Shrawasti, (Uttar Pradesh) – 271831

21.

Kendriya Vidyalaya, Shivgarh, Shivgarh Palace, Raebareli, (Uttar Pradesh) – 229308

22.

Kendriya Vidyalaya, Hardoi, (Govt Inter College Campus), Ghantaghar Road, Hardoi

(Uttar Pradesh) - 241001

[No. 11011-3/2016-O.L.U]

SUKHBIR SINGH SANDHU, Jt. Secy.

Je ,oa jkstxkj ea=kky;

ubZ fnYyh] 20 iQjojh] 2017

498

—

vkS

|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

,llhlh,y

ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksaaaaaa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksf

xd vfèkdj.k

Je U;k;ky;]

gSnjkckn

ds iapkV

(lanHkZ la[;k

2007

) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 20

2017 dks çkIr gqvk

FkkA

¹la

,y&

22013

@20

&vkbZvkj (

lh,e

)º

flag

] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

New Delhi, the 20th February, 2017

S.O. 498.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 69/2007) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. SCCL,

and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 20.02.2017.

[No. L-22013/2/2017-IR (CM-II)]

M. K. SINGH, Section Officer

(ii)

1045

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, AT

HYDERABAD

Present: Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer

Dated the 18^th day of January, 2017

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L.C.No. 69/2007

Between:

Sri Jageti Kumara Swamy,

S/o Posham,

C/o Smt. A. Sarojana,

Advocate, Flat No.G7,

Rajeshwari Gayatri Sadan,

Opp: Badruka Jr. College for Girls,

Kachiguda, Hyderabad .

… Petitioner

AND

The General Manager,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

Mandamarri Area, Mandamarri,

Adilabad District.

The Colliery Manager,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

KK-5 Incline, Mandamarri Area,

Mandamarri, Adilabad District.

…Respondents

Appearances:

For the Petitioner :

M/s. A. Sarojana & K. Vasudeva Reddy, Advocates

For the Respondent :

M/s. P.A.V.V.S. Sarma & Vijaya Lakshmi Panguluri, Advocates

AWARD

Sri Jageti Kumara Swamy who worked as Badli Filler (who will be referred to as the workman) has filed this

petition under Sec. 2A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 against the Respondents M/s. Singareni Collieries

Company Ltd., seeking for declaring the proceeding No. P/MM/7/2/00/4665 dated 3.11.2000 issued by Respondent

No.1 as illegal, arbitrary and to set aside the same consequently directing the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner

into service duly granting all the consequential benefits such as continuity of service, back wages and all other

attendant benefits etc., and such other reliefs as this court may deems fit.

The averments made in the petition in brief are as follows:

The Petitioner was appointed as badli filler in the year 1988 and thereafter confirmed as Coal Filler in 1995. The

Petitioner was regular to his duties from the date of his appointment. But during the year 1998, the Petitioner suffered

with illness and other family problems, for which the Petitioner remained absent. While the matters stood thus, one

charge sheet dated 5.3.1999 was issued to the Petitioner by the Respondents alleging that the Petitioner absented for

duty during the year 1998, which amounts to misconduct under company‘s Standing Order No.25.25. Subsequently,

one inquiry was conducted and during the time of the enquiry, the Petitioner was not given any opportunity much less

valid in nature to put forth his grievances. Basing on such lopsided enquiry, the Enquiry Officer held the charges as

proved and basing on the erroneous findings of the Enquiry Officer, the Petitioner was dismissed from service vide

order No. P/MM/7/2/00/4665 dated 3.11.2000. It is stated that during the course of the enquiry the Petitioner has

categorically stated that his inability to perform his duties regularly during the year 1998 was only on account of his ill-

health and other family problems. But without considering any of his submissions, the Petitioner was dismissed from

service. It is also stated that the action of the Respondents management in dismissing the Petitioner from service is

wholly illegal, arbitrary, violative of the principles of natural justice. The Petitioner has rendered thirteen years of

1046 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA MARCH 4, 2017/PHALGUNA 13, 1938

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

continuous service in the Respondents‘ management. The Petitioner approached the Respondents to consider his case

sympathetically, but the management did not pay any heed to it. Therefore, the Petitioner was constrained to

approach this Tribunal to declare the impugned order No. P/MM/7/2/00/4665 dated 3.11.2000 issued by the

Respondents is illegal and arbitrary and to set aside the same and consequently to direct the Respondents to reinstate

the Petitioner into service duly granting all other attendant benefits such as continuity of service, back wages etc.

The Respondents filed counter denying the averments made in the petition, with the averments in brief

which runs as follows:

In the counter the Respondents while admitting some of the factual aspects to be true, stated that the Petitioner was

appointed in the Respondents‘ company on 12.12.1988 as Badli Filler and was later appointed as Coal Filler from

1.9.1995. He was dismissed from service on proved charges of absenteeism, after conducting a detailed domestic

enquiry duly following the principles of natural justice. The Petitioner has attended the enquiry fixed and had fully

participated in the enquiry. He was given full, fair and reasonable opportunity to defend himself in the enquiry. The

enquiry was conducted purely following the principles of natural justice. It is stated that basing on the evidence

adduced before the Enquiry Officer, the Enquiry Officer submitted his report holding the charges levelled against the

Petitioner was proved. A copy of the enquiry report and the enquiry proceeding was sent to the Petitioner by way of

show cause notice giving him an opportunity to make representation against the findings of the enquiry report; since

the charge levelled against the Petitioner is proved and it was serious in nature, punishment warranted was dismissal

from service. The Disciplinary Authority has gone through the enquiry proceeding and his past record and found that

there was no extenuating circumstances to take a lenient view and lastly, the Respondent was constrained to dismiss the

Petitioner from service. It is stated that in fact the Petitioner was irregular to his duties and he did not improve his

attendance even after issuing charge sheet to him, and after receiving the show cause notice. It is further stated that the

punishment imposed on the Petitioner is justified and legal and as such the claim petition is liable to be dismissed in

limini.

In view of the memo filed by the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner admitting the validity of the domestic

enquiry to be legal and valid, the domestic enquiry conducted in the present case is held as legal and valid vide order

dated 24.2.2009.

Both the parties have advanced their arguments under Sec.11(A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, in

support of their claim.

In view of the above facts, the points for determination are:

Whether the action of the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., in imposing the punishment

of dismissal from service to Sri Jageti Kumara Swamy is legal and justified?

II.

Whether the Petitioner is entitled for reinstatement into service?

III.

If not, to what other relief he is entitled?

Point No.I: During the course of argument, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner

submitted that due to illness and family problems, the Petitioner could not be able to attend his duty sincerely. Even in

his show-cause the Petitioner has mentioned the above fact but it has not been considered during the course of the

enquiry and on account of absenteeism capital punishment of dismissal from service was imposed on the Petitioner.

When the Petitioner has taken a stand that due to his illness, and other family problems he could not be able to attend

his duties regularly and remained absent, the authority should have considered his case while imposing punishment.

But, without considering any of the explanations of the Petitioner the authority has given capital punishment to the

Petitioner when several modes of punishment are enumerated in the company‘s Standing Orders.

On the other hand, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents submitted that when the

Petitioner was a chronic absentee and was found guilty in the charges levelled against him, the punishment imposed

by the Respondents‘ company is legal and proper. When the Petitioner was not sincere in his duty and failed to

maintain minimum musters in a year he is not entitled to be reinstated in service.

Admittedly, working in the Mines is hazardous and remaining absent is not unusual. In this case, due to the

illness of the Petitioner and other family problems, the Petitioner could not be able to be regular in his duty, the

Petitioner has remained absent in his duties and one proceeding was initiated against him for his absenteeism followed

by an enquiry. In the enquiry, the charges levelled against the Petitioner were proved. For this, capital punishment was

imposed and the Petitioner was dismissed from service. After dismissal of service, the Petitioner has become jobless

and unable to provide a square meal to his family members. He has already realised his mistake and has taken shelter

in the court of Law at the age of 40 years, he is now aged about 50 years and is searching ways and means to provide

bread and butter to his family members. When the Petitioner being an able bodied and energetic man has already

realised his mistake and is coming forward to work, atleast one chance should be given to him for reinstatement into

service. Admittedly several modes of punishment are enumerated in company‘s Standing Orders. The Petitioner is a

first offender and has worked for more than five years under the Respondents‘ management. While imposing capital

punishment to his employees, the management should think of the condition of the workers as well as his family

(ii)

1047

members. In this case, the punishment imposed by the Respondents for dismissal of service is too harsh. Therefore, it

can safely be stated that the action taken by the management in imposing the punishment of dismissal from service to

Sri Jageti Kumara Swamy is not legal and justified.

Thus, Point No.I is answered accordingly.

10.

Point Nos. II & III: In Point No.I, it has already been discussed that the punishment of dismissal from

service to Sri Jageti Kumara Swamy is not legal and justified. After dismissal of service as stated earlier, when the

Petitioner has already realised his mistake and has come to the court with a prayer for his reinstatement into service he

should be given a chance to serve for his family members. After dismissal of service the Petitioner has already become

jobless and he being the sole bread earner of his family, is unable to provide a square meal to his family members. In

such a circumstances atleast the Petitioner should be given a chance to maintain his livelihood and to work under the

Respondents‘ management. But in this case, the Petitioner has not come to the court soon after his dismissal of service.

In the opinion of this Tribunal the Petitioner is not entitled to get all the relief as claimed in his claim petition. But he

is only entitled to be given a chance to work in the Respondents‘ management.

Thus, Point Nos. II & III are answered accordingly.

ORDER

Proceeding No. P/MM/7/2/00/4665 dated 3.11.2000 issued by Respondent No.1 is declared as illegal and is

hereby set aside. It is ordered that the workman Sri Jageti Kumara Swamy be taken into service as a fresh employee

i.e., Badli filler in Cat.I, on initial basic pay without back wages and continuity of service, subject to medical fitness by

the company Medical Board and the workman be kept under probation for a period of one year. The management is

also directed to take an undertaking of good behaviour from the workman at the time of his posting.

The Workman can not claim for his posting in the same place, where he was last employed. The workman

shall have either to maintain either minimum mandatory 20 musters every month or 190 musters in a year and the

management shall have the right to review the work of the workman in every three months. In the event of any short

fall of attendance during the period of the three months, the service of the workman will not be terminated and he will

be cautioned to improve his performance by issuing him a warning letter. However, in the event of any shortfall of

attendance during one year of service of the workman, he will be terminated from service without any further notice

and enquiry. The management shall consider any forced absenteeism on account of Mine accidents/ Natural disasters,

taking treatment in the company‘s hospital, as attendance. All other usual terms and conditions of appointment will

be applicable i.e., transfer, hours of work, day of rest, holidays etc.. to the workman for appointment afresh.

Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.

Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant and corrected by me on this the 18^th day of

January, 2017.

MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner

Witnesses examined for the Respondent

NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

ubZ fnYyh] 20 iQjojh] 2017

499

—

vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds

vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj ,llhlh,y

ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksaaaaaa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksf

vfèkdj.k

Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 119@2017) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUn

zh; ljdkj dks 20

2017 dks

çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la

,y&22013@

2@2017&vkbZvkj (lh,e&

)º

flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

1048 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA MARCH 4, 2017/PHALGUNA 13, 1938

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 20th February, 2017

S.O. 499.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 119/2007) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. SCCL,

and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 20.02.2017.

[No. L-22013/2/2017-IR (CM-II)]

M. K. SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT AT

HYDERABAD

Present: Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer

Dated the 25^th day of January, 2017

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L.C.No. 119/2007

Between:

Sri Raj Mohammad,

S/o Roshan Ali,

C/o Smt. A. Sarojana,

Advocate, Flat No.G7,

Rajeshwari Gayatri Sadan,

Opp: Badruka Jr. College for Girls,

Kachiguda, Hyderabad .

…Petitioner

AND

The Director(PA&W)

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

Kothagudem, Khammam District.

The General Manager,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

Srirampur Area, Srirampur,

Adilabad District.

…Respondents

Appearances:

For the Petitioner :

M/s. A. Sarojana & K. Vasudeva Reddy, Advocates

For the Respondent :

M/s. P.A.V.V.S. Sarma & Vijaya Lakshmi Panguluri, Advocates

AWARD

Sri Raj Mohammad who worked as Badli Filler (who will be referred to as the workman) has filed this

petition under Sec. 2A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 against the Respondents M/s. Singareni Collieries

Company Ltd., seeking for declaring the proceeding No. CRP/PER/IR/D/91/4781 dated 14.5.2007 issued by

Respondent No.1 as illegal, arbitrary and to set aside the same consequently directing the Respondents to reinstate the

Petitioner into service duly granting all the consequential benefits such as continuity of service, back wages and all

other attendant benefits etc., and such other reliefs as this court may deems fit.

The averments made in the petition in brief are as follows:

The Petitioner was appointed as badli filler on 29.5.1982 and subsequently promoted as Coal Filler in the year 1993

and further he was promoted as Shot Firer(C) in the year 2000. The Petitioner was regular to his duties from the date of

his appointment. But during the year 2005, the Petitioner‘s mother expired and the Petitioner suffered with illness and

(ii)

1049

other family problems, for which the Petitioner remained absent in his duties. While the matters stood thus, one charge

sheet dated 17.3.2006 was issued to the Petitioner by the Respondents alleging that the Petitioner absented for duty

during the year 2005, which amounts to misconduct under company‘s Standing Order No.25.25. Subsequently, one

inquiry was conducted and during the time of the enquiry, the Petitioner was not given any opportunity much less valid

in nature to put forth his grievances. Basing on such lopsided enquiry, the Enquiry Officer held the charges as proved

and basing on the erroneous findings of the Enquiry Officer, the Petitioner was dismissed from service vide order No.

CRP/PER/IR/D/91/4781 dated 14.5.2007. It is stated that during the course of the enquiry the Petitioner has

categorically stated that his inability to perform his duties regularly during the year 2005 was only on account of his

mother‘s death, ill-health and other family problems. But without considering any of his submissions, the Petitioner

was dismissed from service. It is also stated that the action of the Respondents management in dismissing the

Petitioner from service is wholly illegal, arbitrary, violative of the principles of natural justice. The Petitioner has

rendered twenty three years of continuous service in the Respondents‘ management. The Petitioner approached the

Respondents to consider his case sympathetically, but the management did not pay any heed to it. Therefore, the

Petitioner was constrained to approach this Tribunal to declare the impugned order No. CRP/PER/IR/D/91/4781 dated

14.5.2007 issued by the Respondents is illegal and arbitrary and to set aside the same and consequently to direct the

Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner into service duly granting all other attendant benefits such as continuity of

service, back wages etc.

The Respondents filed counter denying the averments made in the petition, with the averments in brief

which runs as follows:

In the counter the Respondents while admitting some of the factual aspects to be true, stated that the Petitioner was

appointed in the Respondents‘ company on 29.5.1982 as Badli Filler and was subsequently promoted as Sr. Mining

Sirdar. He was dismissed from service on proved charges of absenteeism, after conducting a detailed domestic enquiry

duly following the principles of natural justice. The Petitioner has attended the enquiry fixed and had fully participated

in the enquiry. He was given full, fair and reasonable opportunity to defend himself in the enquiry. The enquiry was

conducted purely following the principles of natural justice. It is stated that basing on the evidence adduced before the

Enquiry Officer, the Enquiry Officer submitted his report holding the charges levelled against the Petitioner was

proved. A copy of the enquiry report and the enquiry proceeding was sent to the Petitioner by way of show-cause

notice giving him an opportunity to make representation against the findings of the enquiry report; since the charge

levelled against the Petitioner is proved and it was serious in nature, punishment warranted was dismissal from service.

The Disciplinary Authority has gone through the enquiry proceeding and his past record and found that there was no

extenuating circumstances to take a lenient view and lastly, the Respondent was constrained to dismiss the Petitioner

from service. It is stated that in fact the Petitioner was irregular to his duties and he did not improve his attendance

even after issuing charge sheet to him, and after receiving the show cause notice. It is further stated that the

punishment imposed on the Petitioner is justified and legal and as such the claim petition is liable to be dismissed in

limini.

In view of the memo filed by the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner admitting the validity of the domestic

enquiry to be legal and valid, the domestic enquiry conducted in the present case is held as legal and valid vide order

dated 19.3.2010.

Both the parties have advanced their arguments under Sec.11(A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, in

support of their claim.

In view of the above facts, the points for determination are:

Whether the action of the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries

Company Ltd., in imposing the

punishment of dismissal from service to Sri Raj Mohammad is legal and justified?