6247 GI/2017

(8551)

jftLVªh la- Mh- ,y- (,u) 04@0007@2003µ05

REGD. No. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05

izkf/dkj ls izdkf'kr

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

lkIrkfgd

WEEKLY

la- 43]

ubZ fnYyh] vDrwcj 22—vDrwcj 28] 2017] 'kfuokj@vkf'ou 30—dk£rd 6] 1939

No. 43]

NEW DELHI, OCTOBER 22—OCTOBER 28, 2017, SATURDAY/ASVINA 30—KARTIKA 6, 1939

bl Hkkx esa fHkUu i`"B la[;k nh tkrh gS ftlls fd ;g i`Fkd ladyu ds :i esa j[kk tk lds

Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

Hkkx II—[k.M 3—mi&[k.M (ii)

PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)

Hkkjr ljdkj ds ea=kky;ksa (j{kk ea=kky; dks NksM+dj) }kjk tkjh fd, x, lkafof/d vkns'k vkSj vf/lwpuk,a

Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India

(Other than the Ministry of Defence)

िव

िव मंालय

मंालय

(िवीय

िवीय

िवीय सेवाएं

सेवाएं

सेवाएं िवभाग

िवभाग

िवभाग)

नई दली, 9 अ तूबर, 2017

का

का.आ. . . . 2498

2498

2498.— रा ीयकृत बक (बंध एवं कण उपबंध) कम, 1970 के खंड 3 के उप-खंड (1) और खड 8

के उप-खंड (1) के साथ पठत, बककारी कंपनी (उप"म# का अजन एवं अंतरण) अिधिनयम, 1970 क धारा 9 क उपधारा

(3) के खंड (क) &ारा द' शि*य# का योग करते -ए, के01ीय सरकार, एत2ारा, से04ल बक आफ इंिडया के महाबंधक

6ी बजरंग 7सह शेखावत (ज0म ितिथ 27.6.1962) को पदभार 8हण करने क तारीख से तीन वष क अविध के िलए

अथवा अगले आदेश# तक, जो भी पहले हो, से04ल बक ऑफ इंिडया म< कायपालक िनदेशक के पद पर िनयु* करती है।

[फा.सं. 4/5/(1)2017-बीओ-I]

>ानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव

8552

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 28, 2017/KARTIKA 6, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

MINISTRY OF FINANCE

(Department of Financial Services)

New Delhi, the 9th October, 2017

S.O. 2498.— In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (a) of sub-section (3) of section 9 of The Banking

Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 read with sub clause (1) of clause 3 and sub clause

(1) of clause 8 of The Nationalized Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970, the Central

Government hereby appoints Shri Bajrang Singh Shekhawat (DOB: 27.6.1962), General Manager, Central Bank of

India as Executive Director in Central Bank of India for a period of three years w.e.f. the date of his taking over charge

of the post or until further orders, whichever is earlier.

[F. No. 4/5/(1)2017-BO-I]

JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.

नई दली, 9 अ तूबर, 2017

का

का.आ. . . . 249

249

2499.— रा ीयकृत बक (बंध एवं कण उपबंध) कम, 1980 के खंड 3 के उप-खंड (1) और खड 8

के उप-खंड (1) के साथ पठत, बककारी कंपनी (उप"म# का अजन एवं अंतरण) अिधिनयम, 1980 क धारा 9 क उपधारा

(3) के खंड (क) &ारा द' शि*य# का योग करते -ए, के01ीय सरकार, एत2ारा, िवजया बक के महाबंधक 6ी गो7वद

एन. ड#गरे (ज0म ितिथ 26.3.1960) को पदभार 8हण करने क तारीख से दनांक 31.3.2020 तक अथात उनक

अिधव@षता क तारीख तक अथवा अगले आदेश# तक, जो भी पहले हो, पंजाब एंड 7सध बक म< कायपालक िनदेशक के पद

पर िनयु* करती है।

[फा.सं. 4/5/(2)2017-बीओ-I]

>ानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 9th October, 2017

S.O. 2499.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (a) of sub-section (3) of section 9 of The Banking

Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1980 read with sub clause (1) of clause 3 and sub clause

(1) of clause 8 of The Nationalized Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1980, the Central

Government hereby appoints Shri Govind N. Dongre (DOB: 26.3.1960), General Manager, Vijaya Bank as Executive

Director in Punjab & Sind Bank w.e.f the date of his taking over charge of the post upto 31.3.2020 i.e. the date of his

superannuation or until further orders, whichever is earlier.

[F. No. 4/5/(2)2017-BO-I]

JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.

नई दली, 9 अ तूबर, 2017

का

का.आ. . . . 2500

2500

2500.— रा ीयकृत बक (बंध एवं कण उपबंध) कम, 1970 के खंड 3 के उप-खंड (1) और खड 8

(3) के खंड (क) &ारा द' शि*य# का योग करते -ए, के01ीय सरकार, एत2ारा, इलाहाबाद बक के महाबंधक 6ी अजय

कुमार 6ीवातव (ज0म ितिथ 15.10.1967) को पदभार 8हण करने क तारीख से तीन वष क अविध के िलए अथवा

अगले आदेश# तक, जो भी पहले हो, इिडयन ओवरसीज बक म< कायपालक िनदेशक के पद पर िनयु* करती है।

[फा.सं. 4/5/(3)2017-बीओ-I]

>ानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vDrwcj 28] 2017@dk£rd 6] 1939

8553

New Delhi, the 9th October, 2017

S.O. 2500.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (a) of sub-section (3) of section 9 of The Banking

Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 read with sub clause (1) of clause 3 and sub clause

(1) of clause 8 of The Nationalized Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970, the Central

Government hereby appoints Shri Ajay Kumar Srivastava (DOB: 15.10.1967), General Manager, Allahabad Bank as

Executive Director in Indian Overseas Bank for a period of three years w.e.f. the date of his taking over charge of the

post or until further orders, whichever is earlier.

[F. No. 4/5/(3)2017-BO-I]

JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.

नई दली, 9 अ तूबर, 2017

का

का.आ. . . . 2501

2501

2501.— रा ीयकृत बक (बंध एवं कण उपबंध) कम, 1970 के खंड 3 के उप-खंड (1) और खड 8

(3) के खंड (क) &ारा द' शि*य# का योग करते -ए, के01ीय सरकार, एत2ारा, इलाहाबाद बक के महाबंधक

6ी मातम व<कट राव (ज0म ितिथ 3.7.1965) को पदभार 8हण करने क तारीख से तीन वष क अविध के िलए अथवा

अगले आदेश# तक, जो भी पहले हो, केनरा बक म< कायपालक िनदेशक के पद पर िनयु* करती है।

[फा.सं. 4/5/(4)2017-बीओ-I]

>ानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 9th October, 2017

S.O. 2501.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (a) of sub-section (3) of section 9 of The Banking

Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 read with sub clause (1) of clause 3 and sub clause

(1) of clause 8 of The Nationalized Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970, the Central

Government hereby appoints Shri Matam Venkata Rao (DOB: 3.7.1965), General Manager, Allahabad Bank as

Executive Director in Canara Bank for a period of three years w.e.f. the date of his taking over charge of the post or

until further orders, whichever is earlier.

[F. No. 4/5/(4)2017-BO-I]

JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.

नई दली, 9 अ तूबर, 2017

का

का.आ. . . . 2502

2502

2502.— रा ीयकृत बक (बंध एवं कण उपबंध) कम, 1980 के खंड 3 के उप-खंड (1) और खड 8

(3) के खंड (क) &ारा द' शि*य# का योग करते -ए, के01ीय सरकार, एत2ारा, बक ऑफ इंिडया के महाबंधक

6ी कुलभूषण जैन (ज0म ितिथ 11.12.1960) को पदभार 8हण करने क तारीख से तीन वष क अविध के िलए अथवा

अगले आदेश# तक, जो भी पहले हो, आ0Cा बक म< कायपालक िनदेशक के पद पर िनयु* करती है।

[फा.सं. 4/5/(5)2017-बीओ-I]

>ानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 9th October, 2017

S.O. 2502.— In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (a) of sub-section (3) of section 9 of The Banking

Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1980 read with sub clause (1) of clause 3 and sub clause

(1) of clause 8 of The Nationalized Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1980, the Central

8554

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 28, 2017/KARTIKA 6, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Government hereby appoints Shri Kul Bhushan Jain (DOB: 11.12.1960), General Manager, Bank of India as Executive

Director in Andhra Bank for a period of three years w.e.f. the date of his taking over charge of the post or until further

orders, whichever is earlier.

[F. No. 4/5/(5)2017-BO-I]

JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.

नई दली, 9 अ तूबर, 2017

का

का.आ. . . . 2503

2503

2503.— रा ीयकृत बक (बंध एवं कण उपबंध) कम, 1970 के खंड 3 के उप-खंड (1) और खड 8

(3) के खंड (क) &ारा द' शि*य# का योग करते -ए, के01ीय सरकार, एत2ारा, पंजाब नैशनल बक के महाबंधक

डॉ. राजेश कुमार यदुवंशी (ज0म ितिथ 23.6.1961) को पदभार 8हण करने क तारीख से तीन वष क अविध के िलए

अथवा अगले आदेश# तक, जो भी पहले हो, देना बक म< कायपालक िनदेशक के पद पर िनयु* करती है।

[फा.सं. 4/5/(6)2017-बीओ-I]

>ानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 9th October, 2017

S.O. 2503.— In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (a) of sub-section (3) of section 9 of The Banking

Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 read with sub clause (1) of clause 3 and sub clause

(1) of clause 8 of The Nationalized Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970, the Central

Government hereby appoints Dr. Rajesh Kumar Yaduvanshi (DOB: 23.6.1961) , General Manager, Punjab National

Bank as Executive Director in Dena Bank for a period of three years w.e.f. the date of his taking over charge of the post

or until further orders, whichever is earlier.

[F. No. 4/5/(6)2017-BO-I]

JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.

नई दली, 9 अ तूबर, 2017

का

का.आ. . . . 2504

2504

2504.— रा ीयकृत बक (बंध एवं कण उपबंध) कम, 1970 के खंड 3 के उप-खंड (1) और खड 8

6ी चैत0य गायFी 7चतापली (ज0म ितिथ 10.8.1960) को पदभार 8हण करने क तारीख से दनांक 31.8.2020 तक

अथात् उनक अिधव@षता क तारीख तक अथवा अगले आदेश# तक, जो भी पहले हो, बक ऑफ इंिडया म< कायपालक

िनदेशक के पद पर िनयु* करती है।

[फा.सं. 4/5/(7)2017-बीओ-I]

>ानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 9th October, 2017

S.O. 2504.— In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (a) of sub-section (3) of section 9 of The Banking

Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 read with sub clause (1) of clause 3 and sub clause

(1) of clause 8 of The Nationalized Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970, the Central

Government hereby appoints Shri Chaitanya Gayatri Chintapalli (DOB: 10.8.1960), General Manager, Bank of India as

Executive Director in Bank of India w.e.f. the date of his taking over charge of the post up to 31.8.2020 i.e. date of his

superannuation or until further orders, whichever is earlier.

[F. No. 4/5/(7)2017-BO-I]

JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vDrwcj 28] 2017@dk£rd 6] 1939

8555

नई दली, 9 अ तूबर, 2017

का

का.आ. . . . 2505

2505

2505.— रा ीयकृत बक (बंध एवं कण उपबंध) कम, 1970 के खंड 3 के उप-खंड (1) और खड 8

(3) के खंड (क) &ारा द' शि*य# का योग करते -ए, के01ीय सरकार, एत2ारा, इंिडयन बक के महाबंधक 6ी कृGणन

एस. (ज0म ितिथ 26.5.1962) को दनांक 1.11.2017 को या उसके बाद पदभार 8हण करने क तारीख से तीन वष क

अविध के िलए अथवा अगले आदेश# तक, जो भी पहले हो, 7सिडकेट बक म< कायपालक िनदेशक के पद पर िनयु* करती है।

[फा.सं. 4/5/(8)2017-बीओ-I]

>ानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 9th October, 2017

S.O. 2505.— In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (a) of sub-section (3) of section 9 of The Banking

Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 read with sub clause (1) of clause 3 and sub clause

(1) of clause 8 of The Nationalized Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970, the Central

Government hereby appoints Shri Krishnan S. (DOB: 26.5.1962), General Manager, Indian Bank as Executive Director

in Syndicate Bank for a period of three years w.e.f. the date of his taking over charge of the post on or after 1.11.2017

or until further orders, whichever is earlier.

[F. No. 4/5/(8)2017-BO-I]

JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.

नई दली, 9 अ तूबर, 2017

का

का.आ. . . . 2506

2506

2506.— रा ीयकृत बक (बंध एवं कण उपबंध) कम, 1970 के खंड 3 के उप-खंड (1) और खड 8

6ी 7लगम व<कट भाकर (ज0म ितिथ 12.12.1962) को दनांक 1.3.2018 को या उसके बाद पदभार 8हण करने क

तारीख से तीन वष क अविध के िलए अथवा अगले आदेश# तक, जो भी पहले हो, पंजाब नैशनल बक म< कायपालक िनदेशक

के पद पर िनयु* करती है।

[फा.सं. 4/5/(9)2017-बीओ-I]

>ानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 9th October, 2017

S.O. 2506.— In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (a) of sub-section (3) of section 9 of The Banking

Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 read with sub clause (1) of clause 3 and sub clause

(1) of clause 8 of The Nationalized Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970, the Central

Government hereby appoints Shri Lingam Venkata Prabhakar (DOB: 12.12.1962), General Manager, Allahabad Bank

as Executive Director in Punjab National Bank for a period of three years w.e.f. the date of his taking over charge of

the post on or after 1.3.2018 or until further orders, whichever is earlier.

[F. No. 4/5/(9)2017-BO-I]

JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.

8556

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 28, 2017/KARTIKA 6, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

fons'k ea=kky;

(lh-ih-oh- izHkkx)

ubZ fnYyh] 3 vDrwcj] 2017

dk-vk- -2507—jktuf;d vkSj dksalqyh; vf/dkjh 'kiFk ,oa iQhl) ds vf/fu;e] 1948 dh /kjk 2 ds [akM (d) ds

vuqlj.k esa oSèkkfud vkns'k A

,rn~}kjk] dsaæ ljdkj Hkkjr ds iz/ku dksalykokl] VksjksaVk esa Jh esgj ¯lg] lgk;d vuqHkkx vf/dkjh dks fnukad 3 vDrwcj]

2017 ls lgk;d dksalqyj vf/dkjh ds rkSj ij dksalqyj lsokvksa ds fuoZgu ds fy, izkfèkd`r djrh gS A

¹la- Vh&4330@01@2016º

izdk'k pUn] funs'kd (dksalqyj)

MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS

(CPV DIVISION)

New Delhi, the 3rd October, 2017

S.O. 2507.—Statutory Order in pursuance of clause (a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular

Officers (Oaths and Fees) Act, 1948 (41 of 1948), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Mehar Singh,

Assistant Section Officer as Assistant Consular Officer in the Consulate General of India, Toronto to perform the

Consular services with effect from 3rd October, 2017.

[No. T-4330/01/2016]

PRAKASH CHAND, Director (Consular)

ubZ fnYyh] 5 vDrwcj] 2017

dk-vk- 2508-—jktuf;d vkSj dksalqyh; vf/dkjh ('kiFk ,oa iQhl) ds vf/fu;e] 1948 dh /kjk 2 ds [akM (d) ds

vuqlj.k esa oSèkkfud vkns'k A

,rn~}kjk] dsaæ ljdkj Hkkjr ds nwrkokl] fj;kn esa Jh lat; dqekj ¯lg] lgk;d vuqHkkx vf/dkjh dks fnukad 5 vDrwcj]

2017 ls lgk;d dksalqyj vf/dkjh ds rkSj ij dksalqyj lsokvksa ds fuoZgu ds fy, izkfèkd`r djrh gS A

¹la- Vh&4330@01@2016º

izdk'k pUn] funs'kd (dksalqyj)

New Delhi, the 5th October, 2017

S.O. 2508.—Statutory Order in pursuance of clause (a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular

Officers (Oaths and Fees) Act, 1948 (41 of 1948), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Sanjay Kumar Singh,

Assistant Section Officer as Assistant Consular Officer in the Embassy of India, Riyadh to perform the Consular

services with effect from 5th October, 2017.

[No. T-4330/01/2016]

PRAKASH CHAND, Director (Consular)

ubZ fnYyh] 13 vDrwcj] 2017

dk-vk- 2509-—jktuf;d vkSj dksalqyh; vf/dkjh ('kiFk ,oa iQhl) ds vf/fu;e] 1948 dh /kjk 2 ds [akM (d) ds

vuqlj.k esa oSèkkfud vkns'k A

,rn~}kjk] dsaæ ljdkj Hkkjr ds nwrkokl] larh;kxks esa Jh jfoUnj lSuh] lgk;d vuqHkkx vf/dkjh dks fnukad 13 vDrwcj]

2017 ls lgk;d dksalqyj vf/dkjh ds rkSj ij dksalqyj lsokvksa ds fuoZgu ds fy, izkfèkd`r djrh gS A

¹la- Vh&4330@01@2017º

izdk'k pUn] funs'kd (dksalqyj)

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vDrwcj 28] 2017@dk£rd 6] 1939

8557

New Delhi, the 13th October, 2017

S.O. 2509.—Statutory Order in pursuance of clause (a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular

Officers (Oaths and Fees) Act, 1948 (41 of 1948), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Ravinder Saini,

Assistant Section Officer as Assistant Consular Officer in the Embassy of India, Santiago to perform the Consular

services with effect from 13th October, 2017.

[No. T-4330/01/2017]

PRAKASH CHAND, Director (Consular)

oL=k ea=kky;

ubZ fnYyh] 9 vDrwcj] 2017

dk-vk- 2510-—dsUnzh; ljdkj (la?k ds 'kkldh; iz;kstuksa ds fy, iz;ksx) jktHkk"kk fu;e] 1976 ds fu;e 10 ds

mi&fu;e (4) ds vuqlj.k esa] oL=k ea=kky; ds varxZr vkus okys fuEufyf[kr dk;kZy; dks] ftlds 80 izfr'kr ls vf/d deZpkfj;ksa

us ¯gnh dk dk;Zlk/d Kku izkIr dj fy;k gS] vfèklwfpr djrh gS %&

jk"Vªh; iWSQ'ku VSDukykWth laLFkku] fuÝV dSEil]

vkbZvkbZVh tks/iqj ds lkeus] ,u,p 65]

ukxkSj jksM] dkjokM+] tks/iqj&342037 (jktLFkku)

¹la- bZ&11016@1@2015&¯gnhº

iquhr vxzoky] la;qDr lfpo

MINISTRY OF TEXTILES

New Delhi, the 9th October, 2017

S.O. 2510.—In pursuance of sub-rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for Official Purpose of the

Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government, hereby notifies the following offices of the Ministry of Textile, more

than 80% staff whereof have acquired working knowledge of Hindi :

National Institute of Fashion Technology, NIFT Campus,

IIT Jodhpur, N.H. 65, Nagour Road,

Karwar, Jodhpur-342037 (Rajasthan)

[No. E-11016/1/2015- Hindi]

PUNEET AGARWAL, Jt. Secy.

ubZ fnYyh] 13 vDrwcj] 2017

dk-vk- 2511-—dsUnzh; ljdkj (la?k ds 'kkldh; iz;kstuksa ds fy, iz;ksx) jktHkk"kk fu;e] 1976 ds fu;e 10 ds

mi&fu;e (4) ds vuqlj.k esa] oL=k ea=kky; ds varxZr vkus okys fuEufyf[kr dk;kZy; dks] ftlds 80 izfr'kr ls vf/d deZpkfj;ksa

us ¯gnh dk dk;Zlk/d Kku izkIr dj fy;k gS] vfèklwfpr djrh gS %&

gLrf'kYi foi.ku ,oa lsok foLrkj dsaæ]

fodkl vk;qDr (gLrf'kYi) dk dk;kZy;]

FkksDlk gkÅl] LdsVld]

ysg&194101 (tEew ,oa d'ehj)

¹la- bZ&11016@1@2015&¯gnhº

iquhr vxzoky] la;qDr lfpo

8558

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 28, 2017/KARTIKA 6, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 13th October, 2017

S.O. 2511.—In pursuance of sub-rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for Official Purpose of the

Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government, hereby notifies the following offices of the Ministry of Textile, more

than 80% staff whereof have acquired working knowledge of Hindi :

Handicrafts Marketing and Service Extension Centre,

Office of the Development Commissioner (Handicrafts),

Thoksa House, Sketsak,

Leh-194101 (Jammu & Kashmir)

[No. E-11016/1/2015- Hindi]

PUNEET AGARWAL, Jt. Secy.

उपभोा मामले, खा और सावजिनक िवतरण मंालय

(उपभोा मामले िवभाग)

(भारतीय मानक यूरो

भारतीय मानक यूरो

भारतीय मानक यूरो)

नई दली, 17 अ तूबर, 2017

का

का.आ. . . . 2512

2512

2512.—भारतीय मानक यूरो (माणन) िविनयम 1988 के िविनयम 4 के उपिनयम (5) के अनुसरण म' भारतीय

मानक यूरो एतद)ारा अिधसूिचत करता है क िजन लाइस'स0 के िववरण नीचे अनुसूची म' दए गए ह2, वे 3वीकृत कर दए गए ह2:-

अनुसूची

सं.

लाइस'स सं

3वीकृत करने

क8 ितिथ वष;/

माह

लाइस'सधारी का नाम व पता

भारतीय मानक का शीष;

भा मा सं (भाग/

अनुभाग) : वष;

6500027907

20170901

मेसस; वाटर टेक इंिडया ायवेट िलिमटड

यूिनट I

10/60-C, स'गोडागौ@डन पुदुर, सुलूर

रोड, मुतुगौ@डनपुदुर पो3ट,

कोयAबCूर– 641 406.

गम; तथा ठंड पानी के िलए

Eलाि3टक क8 िबब ट0Fटयाँ,

एंगल वाव, रोक वाव

तथा फुहारक

IS 9763 :

2000

6500028008

20170904

मेसस; आर डी एन ए ला िमनरल

1/197, पू तोIम, नेFरपेFरचल, पूलुवापIी

पो3ट, ितJपुर– 641 602

पैकेज बंद पेय जल

(पैकेजबंद िमनरल जल के

अलावा)

IS 14543 :

2004

6500028109

20170908

मेसस; पयोनीर ोड Kस

सं. 4 & 5, ए.के.जी. नगर,

वरदाराजापुरम, उिEपलीपालयम,

कोयAबCूर -641015

िनAमजनीय पAपसेट

IS 8034 :

2002

6500028210

20170911

मेसस; एम बी एस पAEस ायवेट िलिमटेड

सं.18, महाLमा गाँधी रोड, नेताजी पुरम,

एस अई एच एस कॉलनी,

कोयAबCूर -641037

िनAमजनीय पAपसेट

IS 8034 :

2002

6590001818

20170911

मेसस; Mी वसु@धरा तंगा मािलगै

5, नया माकNट सडक, पुराने बस अOे के

पास, ितJEपुर -641604

3 वण; एवं 3 वण; िमMधातुएं,

आभूषण/ िश पकारी –

शुPता एवं मुहरांकन

IS 1417 :

2016

6500028311

20170915

मेसस; एQाFरयस पी वी सी पाइEस

सं.7/79(1), अरसमरा तोIम,

को@डयमपालयम, तेRAमनलूर पो3ट,

तो@डामुतूर के रा3ते,

कोयAबCूर -641109.

िवSुत ितTापन के िलए

वािहका– भाग 3– सUत

एवं सादा िवSुत अवरोधी

वािहका

IS 9537 (Part

3) : 1983

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vDrwcj 28] 2017@dk£rd 6] 1939

8559

6590002012

20170919

मेसस; फैन गोड डायम@ड िसवर

13/133, प@दलुर बज़ार, नेिलयालम,

प@दलुर, नीलिगरीस-643233

3 वण; एवं 3 वण; िमMधातुएं,

आभूषण/ िश पकारी –

शुPता एवं मुहरांकन

IS 1417 :

2016

6590001919

20170919

मेसस; वासवी तंगा मािलगै

228, मैसूर Xंक सडक, सLयामंगलम,

ईरोड - 638402

3 वण; एवं 3 वण; िमMधातुएं,

आभूषण/ िश पकारी –

शुPता एवं मुहरांकन

IS 1417 :

2016

6500028412

20170919

मेसस; सेज़र इल Xोिन स िलिमटड,

यूिनट IV

एस एफ सं.863, बेIतापुरम, कारामडै

पो3ट, कोयAबCूर -641104.

पी वी सी संवािहत (हैवी

Yूटी) िबजली के केबल:

भाग 1 - 1100 V तक के

काय;कारी वोटता के िलए

IS 1554 (Part

1): 1988

10.

6590002113

20170920

मेसस; िव3पाक; Zवेलरी मेनुफै च[स;

ायवेट िलिमटड

11, मेटूपालयम सडक, जी. एन. िमस

पो3ट, कोयAबCूर -641029

चाँदी एवं चाँदी

िमMधातुएं, आभूषण/

िशल् पकारी – शुPता एवं

मुहरांकन

IS 2112 :

2014

11.

6500028505

20170920

मेसस; एQासब इंजीिनय]रग (यूिनट II)

एस एफ 307 & 308, कुJडमपालयम

िवला,

एन एस एन पालयम पो3ट,

वेतालैकैपालयम,

कोयAबCूर-641031

कृिष अनुयोग के अपक'^ी

पAप0 के िलए तीन फेज़ीय

ि3Qरल केज ेरण मोटर'

IS 7538 :

1996

12.

6590002214

20170925

मेसस; एम एम एस Zवेलस;

पुराना सं. 571, नया सं. 26, अ_ाहारम

सडक,

ईरोड -638001

3 वण; एवं 3 वण; िमMधातुएं,

आभूषण/ िश पकारी –

शुPता एवं मुहरांकन

IS 1417 :

2016

13.

6590002315

20170925

मेसस; शि` गोड

30, अ_ाहारा सडक,

ईरोड -638001

3 वण; एवं 3 वण; िमMधातुएं,

आभूषण/ िश पकारी –

शुPता एवं मुहरांकन

IS 1417 :

2016

[सं. सीएमडी/13 : 11]

टी. कलैवाणन, वैaािनक ‘एफ’ एवं मुख

MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

(Department of Consumer Affairs)

(BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS)

New Delhi, the 17th October, 2017

S.O. 2512.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (5) of the regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards

(Certification) Regulation 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies the grant of licence particulars of

which are given in the following schedule:

SCHEDULE

Sl.

No.

Licence No.

Grant

Date

Name and Address (Factory) of the Party

Title of the Standard

IS No. Part/

Sec. Year

6500027907

20170901

M/s. Watertec India Pvt Ltd Unit I

10/60-C, Sengodagounden Pudur,

Sulur Road, Muthugoundenpudur (P.O.),

Coimbatore – 641 406.

Plastics Bib Taps, Pillar Taps,

Angle Valves and Stop Valves

for Hot and Cold Water

Services

IS 9763 : 2000

8560

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 28, 2017/KARTIKA 6, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

6500028008

20170904

M/s. RDN Aqua Mineral

1/197, Poo Thottam, Neriperichal,

Pooluvapatti Post,

Tirupur – 641 602

Packaged Drinking Water

(Other Than Packaged

Natural Mineral Water)

IS 14543 : 2004

6500028109

20170908

M/s. Pioneer Products

No. 4&5, A.K.G. Nagar,

Varadharajapuram, Uppilipalayam,

Coimbatore -641015

Submersible Pumpsets

IS 8034 : 2002

6500028210

20170911

M/s. MBS Pumps Private Limited

No.18, Mahatma Gandhi Road,

Nethajipuram, SIHS Colony,

Coimbatore -641037

Submersible Pumpsets

IS 8034 : 2002

6590001818

20170911

M/s. Shree Vasundra Thanga Maaligai

5, New Market Street,

Near Old Bus Stand,

Tirupur -641604

Gold and Gold Alloys,

Jewellery/ Aertefacts-

Fineness and Marking

IS 1417 : 2016

6500028311

20170915

M/s. Aquarius PVC Pipes

No.7/79(1), Arasamara Thottam,

Kondayampalayam,

Thennammanallur(P.O.),

Thondamuthur (Via),

Coimbatore-641109.

Conduits for Electrical

Installations: Part 3 - Rigid

Plain Conduits of Insulating

Materials

IS 9537 (Part 3)

: 1983

6590002012

20170919

M/s. Fine Gold Diamond Silver

13/133, Pandalur Bazzar,

Nelliyalam, Pandalur,

Nilgiris-643233

Gold and Gold Alloys,

Jewellery/ Aertefacts-

Fineness and Marking

IS 1417 : 2016

6590001919

20170919

M/s. Vasavi Thanga Maligai

228, Mysore Trunk Road,

Sathyamangalam,

Erode-638402

Gold and Gold Alloys,

Jewellery/ Aertefacts-

Fineness and Marking

IS 1417 : 2016

6500028412

20170919

M/s. Salzer Electonics Limited,Unit IV

SF No.863, Bettathapuram,

Karamadai Post,

Coimbatore-641104.

PVC insulated (heavy duty)

electric cables: Part 1 - For

working voltages upto and

including 1100 V

IS 1554 (Part 1):

1988

10.

6590002113

20170920

M/s. Vispark Jewellery Manufacturers

Pvt. Ltd.

11, Mettupalayam Road,

G N Mills Post,

Coimbatore -641029

Silver and Silver Alloys,

Jewellery/ Aertefacts-

Fineness and Marking

IS 2112 : 2014

11.

6500028505

20170920

M/s. Aquasub Engineering (Unit II)

SF 307 & 308, Kurudampalayam Villa,

NSN Palayam Post, Vethalaikaipalayam,

Coimbatore -641031

Three Phase Squirrel Cage

Induction Motors for

Centrifugal Pumps for

Agricultural Applications

IS 7538 : 1996

12.

6590002214

20170925

M/s. M.M.S. Jewellers

Old No. 571, New No. 26, Agraharam

Street,

Erode -638001

Gold and Gold Alloys,

Jewellery/ Aertefacts-

Fineness and Marking

IS 1417 : 2016

13.

6590002315

20170925

M/s. Sakthi Gold

30, Agrahara Street,

Erode -638001

Gold and Gold Alloys,

Jewellery/ Aertefacts-

Fineness and Marking

IS 1417 : 2016

[No. CMD/13:11]

T. KALAIVANAN, Scientist ‘F’ & Head

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vDrwcj 28] 2017@dk£rd 6] 1939

8561

नई दली, 17 अ तूबर, 2017

का

का.आ. 2513

2513

2513.—भारतीय मानक यूरो (माणन) िविनयम, 1988 के िविनयम (5) के उपिविनयम (6) के अनुसरण म' भारतीय

मानक यूरो एतcारा अिधसूिचत करता है क िनA न िववरण वाले लाइस'स0 को उनके आगे दशा;यी गई तारीख से रद्द /3 थिगत कर दया

गया है :-

अनुसूची

सं.

लाइस'स सं

सी एम/

एल-

लाइस'सधारी का नाम व पता

3थिगत कए गए/ रe कए गए लाइस'स के

अंतग;त व3तु/ 5म सAबP भारतीय मानक का

शीष;क

रe होने क8

ितिथ

िसतA बर 2017 - शू@य

[सं. सीएमडी/13:13]

टी. कलैवाणन, वैaािनक ‘एफ’ एवं मुख

New Delhi, the 17th October, 2017

S.O. 2513.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (6) of the regulation 5 of the Bureau of Indian Standards

(Certification) Regulations 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies that the licences particulars of

which are given below have been cancelled/suspended with effect from the date indicated against each:

SCHEDULE

Sl.

No.

Licence No.

CM/L-

Name & Address of the Licensee

Article/ Process with relevant

Indian Standard covered by the

licence cancelled/ suspension

Date of

Cancellation

SEPTEMBER 2017 - NIL

[No. CMD/13:13]

T. KALAIVANAN, Scientist ‘F’ & Head

isisisisVªksfy;e ,oa izkÑfrd xSl ea=ky;

Vªksfy;e ,oa izkÑfrd xSl ea=ky;

ubZ fnYyh] 28 flrEcj] 2017

dkdkdkdk-vkvkvkvk- 2514

2514

2514.— क' ^ीय सरकार को लोकिहत म' यह आवfयक तीत होता है क पंजाब राZय म' गाँव : झुिगयां, िजला : शहीद

भगत iसह नगर से िहमाचल देश के गाँव : पेखुबेला, िजला : उना तक पेXोिलयम उLपाद0 के पFरवहन के िलए इंिडयन ऑइल

कापkरेशन िलिमटेड )ारा पीएजेपीएल-उना lांच पाइपलाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए।

और, क'^ीय सरकार को यह तीत होता है क ऐसी पाइपलाइन िबछाने के योजन के िलए ऐसी भूिम िजसके भीतर

पाइपलाइन िबछाई जाने का 3ताव है और जो इस अिधसूचना से उपाबP अनुसूची म' वqणत है, के उपयोग के अिधकार का अज;न करना

आवfयक है।

अत: अब क' ^ीय सरकार, पेXोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूिम म' उपयोग के अिधकार का अज;न) अिधिनयम 1962

(1962 का 50) क8 धारा ३ क8 उपधारा (1) )ारा दC शि`य0 का योग करते rए उस भूिम म' उपयोग के अिधकार का अज;न करने के

अपने आशय क8 घोषणा करती है।

8562

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 28, 2017/KARTIKA 6, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

कोई tि`, जो उ` अनुसूची म' वqणत भूिम से िहतबP है, उ` अिधिनयम, क8 धारा 3 क8 उपधारा (1) के अधीन जारी क8

गयी अिधसूचना से यु` भारत के राजपu क8 ितयां साधारण जनता को उपलध करा दए जाने क8 तारीख से इv8स दन0 के भीतर,

उसम' उपयोग के अिधकार का अज;न या भूिम के नीचे पाइपलाइन िबछाए जाने के संबंध म' आwेप, िलिखत xप म' Mी. देवराज शमा;,

सwम ािधकारी, इंिडयन ऑइल कापkरेशन िलिमटेड (पाइपलाइन भाग), पीएजेपीएल- उना lांच पाइपलाइन पFरयोजना, 346,

कमला कुंज, डी. सी. कॉलोनी, उना (िहमाचल देश) -174 303 को कर सकेगा।

vuqlwph

uqlwph

ftyk %

ftyk % muk

jkT; %

jkT; % fgekpy izns’k

. सं.

तहसील का

नाम

गाँव का नाम

हदब त नं

मुरबा//कला

तथा खसरा सं.

ेफल

हेटेयर

एयर

वग मीटर

हरोली

बाथड़ी

476

1523

हरोली

केलूवा

3302/2

2955

2643/1

2643/2

2953/1

2953/2

हरोली

बट कलां

473

679//5/3/2

ऊना

नंगड़ा िझकला

222

2270/523

[फा. सं. आर&25011@20@2017&ओआर&I]

पवन कुमार] अवर सिचव

MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS

New Delhi, the 28th September, 2017

S.O. 2514.— Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for

the transportation of Petroleum Products from Village : Jhungian, District : Shahid Bhagat Singh Nagar of Punjab State

to Village: Pekhubela, District : Una of Himachal Pradesh, PAJPL - Una Branch Pipeline should be laid by the Indian

Oil Corporation Limited.

And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is

necessary to acquire the Right of User in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is

described in the Schedule annexed to this notification.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the petroleum and

Mineral Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of user in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby

declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein.

Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may within 21 days from the date on which

the copies of this notification issued under sub-section (1) of the section 3 of said Act, as published in the Gazette of

India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein of laying

of the pipeline under the land to Shri. Devraj Sharma, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd, PAJPL-Una

Branch Pipeline Project, 346, Kamla Kunj, D.C. Colony, Una (Himachal Pradesh) -174 303.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vDrwcj 28] 2017@dk£rd 6] 1939

8563

SCHEDULE

District : Una

State : Himachal Pradesh

Sr.

No.

Name of

Tehsil

Name of Village

Hadbast

No.

Murabba// Killa

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Area

Sq/Mtr

Haroli

Bathari

476

1523

Haroli

Keluwa

3302/2

2955

2643/1

2643/2

2953/1

2953/2

Haroli

Bat Kalan

473

679// 5/3/2

Una

Nangran Jhikla

222

2270/523

[F. No. R-25011/20/2017-OR-I]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

ubZ fnYyh] 11 vDrwcj] 2017

dk-vk- 2515-&dsUnzh; ljdkj dks yksdfgr esa ;g vko“;d izrhr gksrk gS fd rfeyukMw jkT; ds lsye dks dsjy

jkT; esa Hkkjr iSVªksfy;e dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM+ dh dksfPp fjQkbujh ls rjyhd`r isVªksfy;e xSl ds ifjogu ds fy,] ,d

ikbiykbZu dksfPp lsye ikbiykbZu çkbosV fyfeVsM+ }kjk fcNkbZ tkuh pkfg,;

vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slh ikbiykbZu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, ;g vko’;d izrhr gksrk gS fd ,slh Hkwfe esa]

tks blls mikc) vuqlwph esa of.kZr gS] ftlesa mDr ikbiykbu fcNk, tkus dk izLrko gS] mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu

fd;k tk, ;

vr% vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] IksVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbu ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½ vf/kfu;e]

1962 ¼1962 dk 50½] dh /kkjk 3 dh mi/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk iznÙk “fDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] ml Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj

dk vtZu djus ds vius vk“; dh ?kks"k.kk djrh gS;

dksbZ O;fDr] tks mDr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa fgrc) gS] ml rkjh[k ls ftldks bl vf/klwpuk ls ;qDr Hkkjr ds

jkti= dh izfr;k¡ lk/kkj.k turk dks miyC/k djk nh tkrh gS] bDdhl fnu ds Hkhrj Hkwfe ds uhps ikbiykbu fcNk, tkus

ds fy;s mleas mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj ds vtZu ds lEcU/k esa Jh c'khjdqatw ,] l{ke çkf/kdkjh] dksfPp lsye ikbiykbu çkbosV

fyfeVsM] d#.k ,aDyso] f}rh; ry] Mksj u- ch&2] ,l ,u taD'ku] fjQkbZujh jksM] ;wfu;u cSad v‚Q bafM;k ds lkeus]

f=iqfuFkqjk] ftyk ,sjukdqye] dsjy & 682309 dks fyf[kr :Ik esa vk{ksi Hkst ldsxkA

8564

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 28, 2017/KARTIKA 6, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

vuqlwph

jkT; : dsjy

ftyk : ,sjukdqye

rkyqd : vkyqok

uke xzke

losZ uEcj

{ks=Qy

gsDVs;j

,fj;k

Áfr oxZehVj

ewDdUuwj ¼[k.M la0 15½

21@5

252@5

djqdqfV ¼[k.M la0 2½

358@4

360@8

366@11

djqdqfV ¼[k.M la0 3½

59@3

rsDdqEckxe ¼[k.M la0 30½

149@3

151@8

155@1

155@4

155@5

156@3

156@4

156@5

156@9

157@2

157@3

157@8

194@1

194@2

194@16

194@17

195@2

195@6

195@8

195@9

195@10

195@13

205@4

205@5

205@12

205@15

206@7

207@2

215@1

215@2

215@3

215@4

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vDrwcj 28] 2017@dk£rd 6] 1939

8565

215@5

226@11

226@12

228@1

229@3

229@4

229@10

230@3

jkT; % dsjy

ftyk % f=“kwj

rkyqd % pkyDdqVh

uke xzke

losZ uEcj

{ks=Qy

gsDVs;j

,fj;k

Áfr oxZehVj

fd"kDdeqjh

841@4

841@5

859@9

859@10

859@13

862@2

dYywj oMkdqeqjh

1192

dYywj Fksdqeqjh

310@1

312@1

459@2

506@6

506@8

jkT; : dsjy

ftyk : f='kwj

rkyqd : eqdqaniqje

uke xzke

losZ uEcj

{ks=Qy

gsDVs;j

,fj;k

Áfr oxZehVj

usUefuDdjk

445

446

449

450

464

[फा. सं. आर&31015@02@2015&ओआर&II/37114]

पवन कुमार] अवर सिचव

8566

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 28, 2017/KARTIKA 6, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 11th October, 2017

S.O. 2515.— Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for

the transport of Liquefied Petroleum Gas from Kochi Refinery of Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited in the State of

Kerala to Salem in the State of Tamil Nadu and that the pipeline should be laid by M/s Kochi – Salem pipeline Private

Ltd;

And whereas , it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipelines, it is

necessary to acquire the right of user in the lands under which such pipelines are proposed to be laid described in the

schedule annexed to this notification;

Now therefore in the exercise of powers conferred by sub section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and

Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (Central Act 50 of 1962) the Central Government

hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein.

Any person, interested in land described in the said schedule may, within 21 days from the date on which the

copies of this notification, as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in

writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying or the pipeline under the land to Sri. Basheerkunju. A,

Competent Authority, Kochi-Salem Pipeline Private Ltd., Karun Enclave 2^nd floor, Door No. B2, S.N. Junction,

Refinery Road, Opp: Union Bank of India, Tripunithura, Pin – 682 301.

SCHEDULE

STATE : KERALA

DISTRICT : ERNAKULAM

TALUK : ALUVA

VILLAGE

SURVEY NUMBERS

AREA (APPROXIMATE)

HECTARES

ARES

SQ MTRS

MOOKKANNOOR

21/5

(BLOCK. NO. 15)

252/5

KARUKUTTY

358/4

BLOCK. NO.2

360/8

366/11

KARUKUTTY

59/3

BLOCK. NO. 3

THEKKUMBHAGAM

149/3

BLOCK. NO. 30

151/8

155/1

155/4

155/5

156/3

156/4

156/5

156/9

157/2

157/3

157/8

194/1

194/2

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vDrwcj 28] 2017@dk£rd 6] 1939

8567

194/16

194/17

195/2

195/6

195/8

195/9

195/10

195/13

205/4

205/5

205/12

205/15

206/7

207/2

215/1

215/2

215/3

215/4

215/5

226/11

226/12

228/1

229/3

229/4

229/10

230/3

STATE : KERALA DISTRICT : TRISSUR

TALUK : CHALAKKUDI

VILLAGE

SURVEY NUMBERS

AREA (APPROXIMATE)

HECTARES

ARES

SQ MTRS

KIZHAKKUMMURI

841/4

841/5

859/9

859/10

859/13

862/2

KALLUR

1192

VADAKKUMMURI

8568

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 28, 2017/KARTIKA 6, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

KALLUR

310/1

THEKKUMMURI

312/1

459/2

506/6

506/8

STATE : KERALA DISTRICT : TRISSUR

TALUK : MUKUNDAPURAM

VILLAGE

SURVEY NUMBERS

AREA (APPROXIMATE)

HECTARES

ARES

SQ MTRS

NENMANIKKARA

445

446

449

450

464

[F. No. R-31015/02/2015-OR-II/37114]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

ubZ fnYyh] 26 vDrwcj] 2017

dkdkdkdk-vkvkvkvk- 2516

2516

2516.— dsUnzh; ljdkj dks yksdfgr esa ;g vko';d izrhr gksrk gS fd mM+hlk jkT; esa ikjknhi ¼mM+hlk½

ls nqxkZiqj ¼if'pe caxky½ rd ok;k gfYn;k ,yihth ifjogu ds fy, bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM ds }kjk ,d

ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkuh pkfg,(

vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slh ikbiykbu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, ;g vko';d izrhr gksrk gS fd ,slh Hkwfe esa

tks bl ls mikc) vuqlwph esa of.kZr gS vkSj ftlesa mDr ikbiykbu fcNk, tkus dk izLrko gS] mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk

vtZu fd;k tk, (

vr% vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbUl ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½ vf/kfu;e]

1962 ¼1962 dk 50½ dh /kkjk 3 dh mi/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk iznRr 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] ml Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj

dk vtZu djus ds vius vk'k; dh ?kks"k.kk djrh gS(

dksbZ O;fDr] tks mDr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa fgrc) gS] ml rkjh[k ls ftldks bl vf/klwpuk ls ;qDr Hkkjr ds

jkti= dh izfr;kWa lk/kkj.k turk dks miyC/k djk nh tkrh gS] bDdhl fnu ds Hkhrj Hkwfe ds uhps ikbiykbu fcNk, tkus

ds fy, mlesa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj ds vtZu ds lEcU/k esa Jh fc'kuq eksgu Hkaktk] l{ke izkf/kdkjh] bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku

fyfeVsM] bafM;u vkW;y gkmflax dkEiysDl] ckyklksj - 756 001] ¼mM+hlk½ dks fyf[kr :Ik esa vk{ksi Hkst ldsxkA

vuqlwph

[फा. सं. आर&25011@52@2017&ओआर&I]

पवन कुमार] अवर सिचव

rglhy % ckyklksj ftyk % ckyklksj jkT; % mM+hlk

Øe

la-

ekStk dk uke

[kljk la-

{ks=Qy

gsDVs;j

,;j

oxZ ehVj

ckaxjk

803

dksjdksjk

373

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vDrwcj 28] 2017@dk£rd 6] 1939

8569

New Delhi, the 26th October, 2017

S.O. 2516.— Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for

the transportation of Liquefied Petroleum Gas from Paradip (Odisha) to Durgapur (West Bengal) Via Haldia a pipeline

should be laid in State of Odisha by Indian Oil Corporation Limited.

And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary

to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the

Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and

Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby

declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on

which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the general public, object in

writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri Bishnu Mohan

Bhanja, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Indian Oil Housing Complex, Balasore – 756 001,

Odisha.

SCHEDULE

[F. No. R-25011/52/2017-OR-I]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

ubZ fnYyh] 26 vDrwcj] 2017

dkdkdkdk-vkvkvkvk- 2517

2517

2517.— dsUnzh; ljdkj dks yksdfgr esa ;g vko';d izrhr gksrk gS fd mM+hlk jkT; esa ikjknhi ¼mM+hlk½

ls nqxkZiqj ¼if'pe caxky½ rd ok;k gfYn;k ,yihth ifjogu ds fy, bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM ds }kjk ,d

ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkuh pkfg,(

vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slh ikbiykbu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, ;g vko';d izrhr gksrk gS fd ,slh Hkwfe esa

tks bl ls mikc) vuqlwph esa of.kZr gS vkSj ftlesa mDr ikbiykbu fcNk,s tkus dk izLrko gS] mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk

vtZu fd;k tk, (

vr% vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbUl ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½ vf/kfu;e]

1962 ¼1962 dk 50½ dh /kkjk 3 dh mi/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk iznRr 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] ml Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj

dk vtZu djus ds vius vk'k; dh ?kks"k.kk djrh gS(

dksbZ O;fDr] tks mDr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa fgrc) gS] ml rkjh[k ls ftldks bl vf/klwpuk ls ;qDr Hkkjr ds

jkti= dh izfr;kWa lk/kkj.k turk dks miyC/k djk nh tkrh gS] bDdhl fnu ds Hkhrj Hkwfe ds uhps ikbiykbu fcNk, tkus

ds fy, mlesa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj ds vtZu ds lEcU/k esa Jh fc'kuq eksgu Hkaktk] l{ke izkf/kdkjh] bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku

fyfeVsM] bafM;u vkW;y gkmflax dkEiysDl] ckyklksj & 756 001] ¼mM+hlk½ dks fyf[kr :Ik esa vk{ksi Hkst ldsxkA

Tahasil :Balasore District : Balasore State : Odisha

Sl. No.

Name of the Mouza

Khasra No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Square

meter

Bangara-199

803

Korkora-198

373

8570

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 28, 2017/KARTIKA 6, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

vuqlwph

[फा. सं. आर&25011@52@2017&ओआर&I]

पवन कुमार] अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 26th October, 2017

S.O. 2517.— Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for

the transportation of Liquefied Petroleum Gas from Paradip (Odisha) to Durgapur (West Bengal) Via Haldia a pipeline

should be laid in State of Odisha by Indian Oil Corporation Limited.

And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary

to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the

Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and

Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby

declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on

which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the general public, object in

writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri Bishnu Mohan

Bhanja, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Indian Oil Housing Complex, Balasore – 756 001,

Odisha.

SCHEDULE

[F. No. R-25011/52/2017-OR-I]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

rglhy % jseq.kk ftyk % ckyklksj jkT; % mM+hlk

Øe

la-

ekStk dk uke

[kljk la-

{ks=Qy

gsDVs;j

,;j

oxZ ehVj

dqjqMk &-196

N.kiqj &-187

1524

1525

1532

es|MEo:--172

Tahasil :Remuna District : Balasore State : Odisha

Sl.

No.

Name of the Mouza

Khasra No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Square meter

Korada-196

Chhanapur-187

1524

1525

1532

Meghadambaru-172

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vDrwcj 28] 2017@dk£rd 6] 1939

8571

Je ,oa jkstxkj ea=kky;

ubZ fnYyh] 23 vDrwcj] 2017

dk-vk- 2518-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj Vhe yhMj]

eSllZ xk;=kh izkstsDV] >kalh ,oa muds deZpkjh ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V

vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] dkuiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 05@2010) dks çdkf'kr

djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 10-10-2017 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&42012@88@2009&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)º

jktsaæ tks'kh] mi funs'kd

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

New Delhi, the 23rd October, 2017

S.O. 2518.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (I.D. No. 05/2010) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Kanpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the

Team Leader, M/s. Gayatri Projects, Jhansi and their workman, which were received by the Central Government on

10.10.2017.

[No. L-42012/88/2009-IR (DU)]

RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SRI SHUBHENDRA KUMAR, HJS, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT/LOK ADALAT, KANPUR

Industrial Dispute No. 5 of 2010

Between-

Shri Deepak Omhare,

RO: H.No. 948/32-A, Nagar Nigam,

Jhansi.

Vs.

The Team Leader,

M/s Gayatri Projects, DH 1/13, Virangana

Nagar, JDA Colony,

Jhansi.

AWARD

Central Government, Mol, vide notification no.L-42012/88/2009-IR (DU) dated 08-01-2010, has referred the

following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal.

Whether the action of the management of M/s. Gayatri Projects Limited, Jhansi in terminating the service of

Shri Deepak Omhare S/o Shri Ram Prasad w.e.f 14/02/2009 is legal & justified? If not, what relief the workman is

entitled to?

In the instant case a reference was referred to Central Government Industrial-Tribunal-cum Labour Court,

Kanpur, whereupon notice to the claimant was issued under registered post by CGIT Kanpur for filing his claim in the

case.

Worker Deepak Omhare has filled his claim statement contending that he was appointed as assistant office

executive with effect from 07-09-2007 with opposite parties on permanent basis and his services were illegally

terminated by management with effect from 14-02-2009.

Management has filed w/s denying the facts alleged by worker in his claim statement and thereafter worker has

filed rejoinder.

8572

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 28, 2017/KARTIKA 6, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

None of parties has given any oral and documentary evidence and evidence of worker were closed. Worker has

moved application for recalling the order by which his evidence was closed but none appeared on behalf of worker to

press this application and therefore the application of worker was rejected.

None of parties appeared to submit their arguments.

I have perused the records of this case. It is duty of worker to prove his case regarding his appointment and

termination by oral and documentary evidence but worker has not given any oral and documentary evidence. As such it

is case of no evidence and worker has failed to prove this case and therefore this tribunal is bound to pass award against

worker.

The award is passed against the worker and in favour of management and worker is not entitled for any relief.

SHUBHENDRA KUMAR, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 23 vDrwcj] 2017

dk-vk- 2519-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj egklfpo]

vkbZ,uVh;wlh] dkuiqj ,oa muds deZpkjh ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd

fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] dkuiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 11@2011) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks

dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 10-10-2017 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&14011@9@2010&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)º

jktsaæ tks'kh] mi funs'kd

New Delhi, the 23rd October, 2017

S.O. 2519.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (I.D. No. 11/2011) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Kanpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the

General Secretary, INTUC, Kanpur and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 10.10.2017.

[No. L-14011/9/2010-IR (DU)]

RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SRI SHUBHENDRA KUMAR, HJS, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT/LOK ADALAT, KANPUR

Industrial Dispute No. 11 of 2011

Between-

The General Manager,

Small Arms Factory,

Kalpi road,

Kanpur (U.P.)

Vs.

The General Secretary, INTUC,

FT/191, Armapur Estate,

Kanpur (U.P.)

AWARD

Central Government, Mol, vide notification no.L-14011/9/2010-IR (DU) dated 22-03-2011, has referred the

following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal.

“Whether the action of the management of General Manager, Small Arms Factory, Kanpur in fixation of pay in

respect of Shri Anand Prakash Garg, T No. 2/B(001716) & Shri Yogendra Kumar Trivedi, T No. 81/RCS(001715) less

than the junior employees is just and proper? What relief the workmen concerned are entitled to?”

In the instant case a reference was referred to Central Government Industrial-Tribunal-cum Labour Court,

Kanpur, whereupon notice to the claimant was issued under registered post by CGIT Kanpur for filing his claim in the

case.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vDrwcj 28] 2017@dk£rd 6] 1939

8573

General Secretary INTUC has filed claim statement stating that Shri Anand Prakash Garg and Shri U.N Trivedi

are workman and working with opposite party small arm factory. This industrial dispute arose regarding wrong fixation

of pay as junior was getting higher pay than the workman.

Management has filed written statement denying the facts alleged in claim statements. Thereafter Union has

filled rejoinder.

Both the parties has filed photocopy of documents.

Neither worker nor management has adduced any evidence in this case.

None of the parties has appeared to submit arguments. I have perused the record.

It appears on perusal of record that both parties have filed documents which are photocopies and none of the

party has adduced any oral evidence to prove the facts and documents filed by them.

10.

It is duty of union to prove that workers are getting less pay than their juniors as pleaded in claim statement but

union failed to prove its case as union did not adduce any oral evidence nor has proved any documents filed by union.

Therefore this tribunal is bound to decide the dispute against union for want of proof.

11.

Therefore for the reason given above this dispute is decided against union and in favour of management as such

worker is not entitled to any relief as claimed by union.

12.

The award is passed accordingly.

SHUBHENDRA KUMAR, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 23 vDrwcj] 2017

dk-vk- 2520-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj funs'kd]

Hkkjrh; izkS|ksfxdh laLFkku] dkuiqj vkSj vU; ,oa muds deZpkjh ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa

fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] dkuiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 66@2014) dks

çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 10-10-2017 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&42012@19@2014&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)º

jktsaæ tks'kh] mi funs'kd

New Delhi, the 23rd October, 2017

S.O. 2520.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (I.D. No. 66/2014) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Kanpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the

Director, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur and others and their workman, which was received by the Central

Government on 10.10.2017.

[No. L-42012/19/2014-IR (DU)]

RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SRI SHUBHENDRA KUMAR, HJS, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT/LOK ADALAT, KANPUR

Industrial Dispute No. 66 of 2014

Between-

Shri Mahavir Shukla,

106/37 Heeraganj,

Kanpur (U.P.)

Vs.

The Director,

Indian Institute of Technology,

8574

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 28, 2017/KARTIKA 6, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Kalyanpur,

Kanpur (U.P.)

AND

M/s Asha Caterers,

No. 14 & 15, Building No. 204,

Narshinthan Street,

Mumbai -400009

AND

M/s Kanka Food Management Service Pvt. Ltd.

105, Jai Shankar, CHS, Bhakti Mandir Marg,

Near Hari Niwas Circle, Naupada,

Thane(W)

Thane -400602

AWARD

Central Government, Mol, vide notification no.L-42012/19/2014-IR (DU) dated 28-05-2014, has referred the

following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal.

“Whether the action of the management of M/s Asha Cateres, Mumbai a contractor engaged in running of the

mess in IIT Kanpur in terminating the services of Shri Mahavir Prasad Shukla without complying the mandatory

provisions of ID Act, 1947 sec 25(G)(F) is just and proper and if not what relief the concerned workman is entitled to?”

In the instant case a reference was referred to Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court,

Kanpur, whereupon notice to the claimant was issued under registered post by CGIT Kanpur for filing his claim in the

case.

Worker Mahavir Shukla has filed his claim statement with the allegation that his service is wrongly and illegally

terminated against which management has filed written statement wherein it is alleged that reference is void and bad in

law because it is not an industrial dispute and denied the facts alleged in claim statement.

None of the parties has filed any oral and documentary evidence authorized representative of workman has

moved an application 13/1 alleging that workmen concerned is not interested in contesting the case and will not filed

any rejoinder or lead any evidence.

I have heard parties representative and perused the record.

It appears that workman is not interested in contesting this case and has not filed any oral and documentary

evidence. Even he has not filed his evidence. Therefore facts alleged in claim statement are hence not proved for want

of evidence and therefore this tribunal is bound to pass award against workman and in favour of management.

The award is passed accordingly.

SHUBHENDRA KUMAR, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 23 vDrwcj] 2017

dk-vk- 2521-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj mi&la;qDr

egkizca/d] ,p,eVh e'khu VwYl fyfeVsM] cSaxyksj vkSj muds deZpkjh ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] cSaxyksj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k

02@2012) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 03-10-2017 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&42012@110@2012&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)º

jktsaæ tks'kh] mi funs'kd

New Delhi, the 23rd October, 2017

S.O. 2521.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (I.D. No. 02/2012) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Bangalore as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vDrwcj 28] 2017@dk£rd 6] 1939

8575

Joint General Manager, HMT Machine Tools Ltd., Bangalore and their workman, which was received by the Central

Government on 03.10.2017.

[No. L-42012/110/2012-IR (DU)]

RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

BANGALORE

DATED : 15^th September, 2017

PRESENT : Shri V. S. RAVI, Presiding Officer

COMMON AWARD

(i) I.D. No. 02/2012

I Party/Applicant

II Party/Respondent

Sh. P Shankara,

The Joint General Manager,

S/o Late Puttappa,

HMT Machine Tools Limited,

No. 65, I Floor,

Bangalore Complex,

Sadar Patrappa Road,

HMT Post,

Bangalore – 560002

Bangalore – 560013

Advocates for I Party: Mr. Vishwanatha Bhat

& Ms. P. Jayalakshmi

(ii) C.R. No. 52/2012

I Party/Applicant

II Party/Respondent

Sh. P Shankara,

The Joint General Manager,

S/o Late Puttappa,

HMT Machine Tools Limited,

No. 65, I Floor,

Bangalore Complex,

Sadar Patrappa Road,

HMT Post,

Bangalore – 560002

Bangalore – 560013

Advocates for I Party: Ms. P. Jayalakshmi

The Central Government vide Order No.L-42012/110/2012-IR(DU) dated 06.12.2012 in exercise of the powers

conferred by Clause (d) of Sub-Section (1) and Sub-Section 2(A) of Section 10 of Industrial Dispute act, 1947 has

made this reference for adjudication with following Schedule :

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of HMT, Bangalore Complex, Bangalore – 13, represented by

Joint General Manager, is justified in imposing the punishment of ‘Dismissal from service’ w.e.f

24.08.2011 upon Shri. P. Shankar? If not, to what relief the said workman is entitled?”

Brief details mentioned in the Claim Statement are as follows:-

The I Party states that, he has been working in the II Party management for the last 27 years honestly, diligently

and sincerely to the best satisfaction of the official superiors maintaining his record of service without any blemish.

Further, it is submitted that, the II Party/Management is a Central Government Public Sector undertaking and earlier it

is known as HMT I & II. The I Party states that, there has been no bargaining representatives of the workmen. Further,

the I Party has not agreed to withdraw the grievance petition and the management has taken hostile attitude towards

him. Under the circumstances the I Party workman has given representation to various labour authorities and the

labour authorities have asked the II Party to submit the reply to the said representation. The II Party management has

not liked the acts of the I Party workman since it has gone against the interest of the management. On the basis of the

representations made by the I Party the Asst. Labour Commissioner has posted the matter for enquiry by letter dated

14.10.2008, 05.02.2009, 30.08.2010 and 15.11.2011. Further, it is submitted that, the II Party has kept I Party under

suspension by order dated 19.12.2008, in which, no reasons whatsoever has been assigned. Thereafter the said order of

suspension has been served to the I Party on 26.12.2008. Thereafter, the II Party has issued ante dated charge sheet

dated 23.12.2008 making baseless charges. Further, the enquiry conducted by the enquiry officer is illegal, arbitrary,

8576

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 28, 2017/KARTIKA 6, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

capricious, perverse and it is opposed to principles of natural justice. The said acts of the II Party amount to imposing

punishment without holding enquiry and the said acts of the II Party amount to unfair labour practices. After the

receipt of the enquiry report the II Party has passed an order bearing No. HRM/10738 dated 24.08.2011, dismissing the

I Party from the services. The action of the II Party amounts to victimization, for his trade unions activities. Due to the

arbitrary and illegal action of the II Party in passing order of dismissal, the I Party and his family members are

undergoing hardship, and they are starving. Further, the I Party states that, he may be permitted to urge additional facts

and grounds by way of amendment at later stage. After the dismissal of the I Party he is not gainfully employed,

elsewhere. Therefore, the I Party workman prays this Court to pass an award holding that, the order of dismissal

bearing No. HRM/10738 dated 24.08.2011, passed by the II Party as unjust and illegal and consequently set aside the

same and direct the II Party to reinstate the I Party workman in his original post with continuity of services with back

wages from the date of illegal dismissal till the date of reinstatement with all consequential benefits and pass such other

order as this Court deems fit to grant in the circumstances of the case with cost to meet the ends of justice. In the

memo dated 15.01.2013, the I Party prays this Court to put up the records in CR No. 52/2012 along with ID

No. 02/2012 and dispose of the same by common award in the interest of justice. Accordingly, the present common

award is passed.

Brief details mentioned in the Counter statement are as follows:-

The II Party states that, the I Party has been involved in a serious offence of using abusive language against the

superiors and also abused the management and also pronounced vulgar language against the security personnel.

Further, the II Party states that, it is not a simple termination, it is because of the I Party attitude and because of his

using foul language, the II Party has invoked the provisions of the Standing Orders and ultimately he has been

dismissed form service. In such an event neither the I Party workman is entitled for back wages nor reinstatement as

claimed in the claim statement. Further, it is submitted that, the I Party workman has joined the service of the company

with effect from 25.10.1984, he has been last promoted as Supervisor with effect from 01.07.2005 and he has been

issued with 5 charge sheets. Further, after considering gravity of the charges and after considering his past records, it

has been decided to terminate his service with one month salary in lieu of notice in accordance with Clause 15(3) of the

Certified Standing Orders of the company and accordingly orders passed on 24.08.2011. Further, the II Party states

that, the I Party workman has been suspended from duty on 19.12.2008 for the misconduct committed on 18.12.2008

hence, the I Party has not been allowed to attend the duty. Further, the II Party states that, the Disciplinary Authority

has imposed the punishment of termination of the I Party workman from the service of the company and the

termination order which has been passed by the management is in accordance with the principles of natural justice, and

the termination order passed by the II Party management is valid and the same is in order. Therefore, the II Party prays

this Court to up hold the dismissal order which has been passed by the II Party/Management in the interest of justice

and equity.

The Pertinent Point/issue involved in the present matter is as follows:-

“Whether I Party is entitled to get relief as prayed for in the claim statement, for the reasons mentioned

therein?”

Point:- Already, this Court on 20.03.2015, after considering the I Party’s documents and evidence, and also, II

Party’s material evidence and after hearing both parties has passed an Order that Domestic Enquiry conducted by II

Party as against the I Party is not fair and proper.

The I Party in his claim statement as well as in his evidence has stated that, he is not gainfully employed and he

has no other source of income to prosecute the case effectively, before this Court. Further, I Party has filed interim

relief, application and for that, also counter has been filed by the II Party by stating that, I Party has got enough means

to lead his livelihood. Further, the I Party states that, he has got wife, son and ailing and aged mother who are wholly

dependent on the applicant for their livelihood and I Party could not get alternative employment also and he has no

source of income and as on date the I Party is unemployed and I Party and his family members are under the verge of

starvation and destitution. Further, the I Party also states that, he has tried for private company job but he is unable to

get employment. Further, Ex W-1 is the letter from I Party to Commissioner of Labour dated 07.03.2008, regarding

holding of the election to the office bearer as their term has already expired on 30.10.2006. Ex W-5 and Ex W-6 are

the payslips of I Party and Ex W-18 is the termination order issued to I Party dated 24.08.2011.

Further, this Court has passed the detailed order on 30.05.2017, itself, regarding the interim relief, which is as

follows:- “That, the respondent herein is directed to pay a sum of Rs. 15,000/- per mensem to Sh. P. Shankara

Applicant herein, for maintaining himself and also, the family of the workman from 03.01.2014, to the date of passing

of the further orders, in order to keep their body and soul together, and also, for the family expenses and also, to live

honourably, on the basis of social, economic and natural justice and also, to conduct the case, effectively.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vDrwcj 28] 2017@dk£rd 6] 1939

8577

(ii) That, the respondent hereby directed to make payment of Rs. 15,000/- per mensem along with the entire arrears

amount from 03.01.2014 on or before 06.07.2017 and also to file compliance memo to this court, after giving advance

copy to the other side on or before 07.07.2017, without fail, and thereafter also, for the succeeding every month the

compliance memo has to be filed by the respondent after making the said amount every month to the said applicant Sh.

P. Shankara, on or before 05^th of the succeeding month, after giving advance copy to the other side.

(iii) That, by way of abandone caution the said Sh. P. Shankara is directed to inform his savings bank account details

with the concerned Bank particulars to the respondent by speed post with acknowledgement due and, also to file

compliance memo to this Court with speed post receipt, copy of the covering letter and also the acknowledgement or

track record, obtained from the website of Government of India, Department of Post, on or before 16.06.2017.”

Since, the II Party has not complied with the Interim Relief Order passed by this Court till date, the counsel for I

Party has relied upon the judgment reported in (1999(81) FLR 789) (Calcutta High Court) (Mr. Justice Samaresh

Banerjee.J) in Civil Order No. 6632(W) of 1996, dated 25.06.1998, between Debabratasen and State of West Bengal,

wherein, it is clearly held as follows:- “Section 11 empowers the Tribunal to regulate its own procedure. In exercise of

such power, therefore, the Tribunal can certainly evolve a procedure for enforcement of an order directing payment of

interim relief to the workman, the same being in the nature of an interlocutory order but for which the very object and

purpose of such welfare legislation will be frustrated. Under such circumstances when an employer violates the order

of the Tribunal directing payment of interim relief by not paying of such amount, even if such order of the Tribunal has

not been set aside or stayed by the higher Court, it will certainly be open to the Industrial Tribunal to enforce

compliance of such order of the Tribunal by making payment of interim relief as condition precedent for the employer

to participate in the adjudication proceedings before the Tribunal and to defend itself.” Though, sufficient and

adequate time has been granted for II Party to make payment of the said interim relief amount to the I Party, the II Party

has not complied with the said interim relief order or obtained any stay order from the Hon’ble Higher Courts. As per

the said citation, this Tribunal can certainly adopt a procedure for enforcement of the order directing interim relief to

workman, and the same being in the nature of an interlocutory order, but for which, the very object and purpose of the

said welfare legislation will be frustrated.

In fact, the II Party has not complied with the said interim relief till date without any valid reasons. Hence, this

Tribunal can enforce the compliance of said order of interim relief as condition precedent for the II Party to participate

in the adjudication proceedings before the Tribunal and to defend itself. Further, the I Party specifically stated in the

claim statement and also in the affidavit that, the Domestic Enquiry held by the II Party has been held to be not fair and

proper by this Court and even the interim relief order passed by this Court by order dated 30.05.2017 has not been

complied by the II Party. Further, the I Party has specifically stated in the affidavit that, he has suffered financial

hardship and mental agony during the period of unemployment and all these years, since the order of removal, he has

no other source of income to survive. Hence, the I Party has prayed to grant reinstatement, full back wages, continuity

of service and other consequential benefits.

On careful perusal of materials brought on records, it is found that, II Party has no right to defend the case and

also, I Party has established that, he is entitled to get relief as prayed for in the claim statement. The II Party has not

disproved the claim made by the I Party in accordance with law. Further, in Basti Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. Vs State of

U.P., (1979) 2 SCC 88, by V. Kishna Iyer. J: “Industrial Jurisprudence does not brook nice nuances and torturesome

technicalities to stand in the way of just solutions reached in a rough and ready manner. Grim and grimy life-situations

have no time for the finer manners of elegant jurisprudence.” Thus, the process of industrial adjudication is an onerous

task being guided by the constitutional mandates and aiming at settlement of the industrial dispute on a fair and just

basis, tested on the touchstone of social and economic justice. When an industrial dispute is raised, it is a commotion

to be pacified by dispensing justice. In such adjudication, not just the right to equality and other Constitutional

guarantees, but the aims and ideals of the Constitution enter into the consideration. It is the duty of the Courts to apply

directive principles in interpreting the Constitution and the laws. Also, it is reported in Lloyds Bank Ltd Vs. Bundy,

(1974) 3 All ER 757 that Lord Denning first clearly enunciated his theory of "inequality of bargaining power". His

Lordship began his discussion on this part of the case by stating (at page 763): "There are cases in our books in which

the courts will set aside a contract, or a transfer of property, when the parties have not met on equal terms, when the

one is so strong in bargaining power and the other so weak that, as a matter of common fairness, it is not right that the

strong should be allowed to push the weak to the wall.” In the present case also, it is seen that, the II Party has not

established the alleged misconduct committed by the I Party, as per the Principles of Preponderance of Probability and

also, as per the Principles of Natural Justice, for the above mentioned various reasons.

10.

Further, it is observed by the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka, in W.P. No. 9974/2006 (L-TER), dated

07.01.2015, (Before Mr. Hon’ble Chief Justice D.H. Waghela and Mr. Hon’ble Justice Budihal. R. B), in the case of

The Management of National Aerospace Laboratories Vs Engineering & General Workers Union and the Managing

Directors, as follows:- “The jurisdiction of an Industrial Tribunal, therefore, is expansive and creative and not

8578

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 28, 2017/KARTIKA 6, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

restricted to only enforcing or interpreting the contract of service or the extant legal provisions and it is not-fettered by

the limitations of contracts and can even involve extension of existing agreement of the making of a new one, or in

general, creation of new obligations or modification of old ones.” In the present case also, for the above mentioned

facts and circumstances it is found that, I Party is entitled to get relief as prayed for in the claim statement for the

reasons mentioned therein. Accordingly, this point is answered in favour of the I Party. Hence, the following Award is

passed:-

AWARD

The II party/management is not justified in imposing the punishment of Dismissal from service on I

party/Sh. P. Shankara w.e.f. 24.08.2011, and the said II party is directed to reinstate the I Party, with full back

wages, continuity of service and all other consequential benefits that he would have received in the absence of

the impugned penalty of removal from service, and both the matters are ordered accordingly, without costs, for

the above mentioned facts and circumstances of the matters.

(Dictated, transcribed, corrected and signed by me on 15^th September, 2017)

V. S. RAVI, Presiding Officer

In I D No. 02/2012 Shankara Vs H M T

List of Witness on the side of I Party: (Merits)

WW 1

Sh. P. Shankara, I Party/workman

Exhibit marked on behalf of I Party: (Victimization)

Exhibits

Date

Description of Document

Ex W-1

07.03.2008

Letter from I Party to Commissioner of Labour

Ex W-2

25.08.2008

Order issued by II Party to I Party

Ex W-3

25.09.2008

Letter from I Party to Asst. Commissioner

Ex W-4

29.08.2006

Allotment of New Ticket Number

Ex W-5

Pay Slip of I Party

Ex W-6

11.02.2010

Pay Slip of I Party

Ex W-7

12.11.2008

RTI Application

Ex W-8

14.10.2008

Letter from Asst. Labour Commissioner to II Party

Ex W-9

05.02.2009

Letter from Asst. Labour Commissioner to I Party

Ex W-10

17.08.2010

Letter from I Party to Asst. Commissioner

Ex W-11

22.12.2008

Letter from I Party to Asst. Commissioner

Ex W-12

27.12.2008

Letter from I Party to Joint General Manager/II Party

Ex W-13

15.01.2009

Letter from I Party to Chairman & Managing Director/II

Party

Ex W-14

16.01.2009

Fax receipt

Ex W-15

18.10.2008

Office Order

Ex W-16

18.10.2008

Office Order

Ex W-17

04.03.2008

Office Order No. 49/2007

Ex W-18

24.08.2011

Order of Termination issued to I Party

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vDrwcj 28] 2017@dk£rd 6] 1939

8579

ubZ fnYyh] 23 vDrwcj] 2017

dk-vk- 2522-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

egkizca/d] ¯gnqLrku ,;jksukWfVDl fyfeVsM] cSaxyksj ,oa muds deZpkjh ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] cSaxyksj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k

02@2017) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 03-10-2017 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&42025@03@2017&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)º

jktsaæ tks'kh] mi funs'kd

New Delhi, the 23rd October, 2017

S.O. 2522.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (I.D. No. 02/2017) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Bangalore as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the

General Manager, Hindustan Aeronautics Limited, Bangalore and their workman, which was received by the Central

Government on 03.10.2017.

[No. L-42025/03/2017-IR (DU)]

RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIUBNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

BANGALORE

DATED : 19^th September, 2017

PRESENT : Shri V. S. RAVI, Presiding Officer

I.D. No. 02/2017

I Party

II Party

Sh. Vasu K.V.,

The General Manager,

No. 120, Venkatadri Nilaya,

Hindustan Aeronautics Limited,

Near Vidya School, 2nd Cross,

Over Haul Division,

Sharavath Road, C M Extension,

Bangalore

Kyathasandra,

Tumkur - 572104

1. The I Party submitted in the claim statement as follows:-

The I Party prays this Court, that, regarding case in the crime No. 26/2012, he is processing in session Courts

under Crl.R.P. and other criminal case No. 109/2016, he is processing in Magistrate Court by step by step and also

prays to initiate cancellation proceedings and conciliation proceedings and advice the management of HAL to reinstate

into services with all consequential benefits to the I Party in the ends of justice.

However, in the Judgment passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal Nos. 9332-9333/2010, dated

26.02.2016, in the case of Nashik workers Union Vs Hindustan Aeronautics Limited, it is clearly held as follows:- “As

we have set aside the order passed in L.P.A. No. 84 of 2006 and opined that the ‘appropriate Government’ in relation to

the respondent company (HAL) is the State Government, the matter has to be remitted to the High Court for fresh

adjudication on merits.”

In the above mentioned facts and circumstances, an important and preliminary point arises for consideration,

with regard to the above mentioned matter as follows:- “Whether this Court lacks jurisdiction to try the present

Matter?”

POINT :- In the present case, the I Party has prayed to initiate cancellation proceedings and conciliation

proceedings and advice the management of HAL to reinstate into services with all consequential benefits to the I Party

in the ends of justice. Hence, it is crystal clear that as per the above mentioned judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme

Court of India, this Court lacks jurisdiction to try the present matter.

8580

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 28, 2017/KARTIKA 6, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Further, taking into consideration the above mentioned points and principles as laid down by the Lordships of

the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, this Court has no other alternative, except to follow the said judgement of the

Hon’ble Supreme Court of India. In fact, the I Party has also not disputed the said details, by raising any tenable

grounds and reasons. At the same time, this Court is not expressing any opinion on other issues raised by both the

sides, as this Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain the present matter of this nature and also liberty is granted to the I

Party to raise the dispute before the proper, competent and appropriate Judicial Forum/Tribunal/Court within 30 days

from the date of receipt of the present Award passed by this Court, in the best interest of justice, equity and fair play.

Accordingly, this point is answered. Hence, the following Award is passed:-

AWARD

This Tribunal has no jurisdiction to entertain the dispute raised by the I party, particularly, in the light of

the above mentioned judgement passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal Nos. 9332-9333/2010,

dated 26.02.2016, in the case of Nashik workers Union Vs Hindustan Aeronautics Limited and the present matter

suffers for want of jurisdiction before this Court and liberty is given to the I party to raise the dispute before the

proper, competent and appropriate Judicial Forum/ Tribunal/Court, within 30 days from the date of receipt of

the present Award, by adopting the procedure known under the law, in the best interest of justice, equity, good

conscience and fair play and this Court has not expressed any opinion regarding the various other issues raised

by both the parties, as the present matter has been disposed of, on the limited ground of jurisdiction point alone,

and also, without costs, for the above mentioned facts and circumstances.

(Dictated, transcribed, corrected and signed by me on 19^th September, 2017)

V. S. RAVI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 23 vDrwcj] 2017

dk-vk- 2523-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

egkizca/d] ¯gnqLrku ,;jksukWfVDl fyfeVsM] cSaxyksj vkSj vU; ,oa muds deZpkjh ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa

ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] cSaxyksj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k

11@2014) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 03-10-2017 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&14011@02@2014&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)º

jktsaæ tks'kh] mi funs'kd

New Delhi, the 23rd October, 2017

S.O. 2523.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (I.D. No. 11/2014) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Bangalore as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the

Deputy General Manager, Hindustan Aeronautics Limited, Bangalore & others and their workman, which was received

by the Central Government on 03.10.2017.

[No. L-14011/02/2014-IR (DU)]

RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIUBNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

BANGALORE

DATED : 21^st September, 2017

PRESENT : Shri V. S. RAVI, Presiding Officer

C.R. No. 11/2014

I Party

II Party

The General Secretary,

1. The Deputy General Manager,

Hindustan Aeronautics,

Hindustan Aeronautics Limited,

Employees Association,

Engine Division, Bangalore Complex,

Vimanapura Post,

PB No. 9310,

Bangalore – 560017

Bangalore – 560093

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vDrwcj 28] 2017@dk£rd 6] 1939

8581

2. The Union of India,

Represented by Ministry of Defence,

South Block, New Delhi.

Advocates for I Party: Mr. Vishwanath Bhat,

Advocate for II Party Sl. No. 1,

Mr. B.D. Kuttappa & Mr. Harish Kumar

Mr. S.V. Shastri

AWARD

The Central Government vide Order No.L-14011/02/2014-IR(DU) dated 27.01.2015 in exercise of the powers

conferred by Clause (d) of Sub-Section (1) and Sub-Section2(A) of Section 10 of Industrial Dispute act, 1947 has made

this reference for adjudication with following Schedule :

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of HAL Bangalore is justified in not implementing the second order

of the appellate authority vide order No. E/HR/App/617/10955/2010, dated 31.08.2010 by which the

management of HAL has modified the punishment of stoppage of 5 increments with cumulative effect to

stoppage of 2 annual increments without cumulative effects? If not, to what relief the said 4 workmen are

entitled to?”

The I Party submitted in the claim statement as follows:-

The I Party workmen prays this Court to answer the points of reference in favour of the I Party and direct the II

Party management to implement the reviewing order of the Appellate Authority retrospectively and grant the I Party

workmen all the consequential monetary benefits flowing there from and pass such other order or orders as deem fit by

this Court including the costs of these proceedings, to meet the ends of justice.

However, in the Judgment passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal Nos. 9332-9333/2010, dated

26.02.2016, in the case of Nashik workers Union Vs Hindustan Aeronautics Limited, it is clearly held as follows:- “As

we have set aside the order passed in L.P.A. No. 84 of 2006 and opined that the ‘appropriate Government’ in relation to

the respondent company (HAL) is the State Government, the matter has to be remitted to the High Court for fresh

adjudication on merits.”

In the above mentioned facts and circumstances, an important and preliminary point arises for consideration,

with regard to the above mentioned matter as follows:- “Whether this Court lacks jurisdiction to try the present

Matter?”

POINT :- In the present case, the I Party has prayed to answer the points of reference in favour of the I Party

and direct the II Party management to implement the reviewing order of the Appellate Authority retrospectively and

grant the I Party workmen all the consequential monetary benefits flowing therefrom and pass such other order or

orders as deem fit by this Court including the costs of these proceedings, to meet the ends of justice. Hence, it is crystal

clear that as per the above mentioned judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, this Court lacks jurisdiction to

try the present matter.

Further, taking into consideration the above mentioned points and principles as laid down by the Lordships of

the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, this Court has no other alternative, except to follow the said judgement of the

Hon’ble Supreme Court of India. In fact, the I Party has also not disputed the said details, in an appropriate, suitable

and proper manner. At the same time, this Court is not expressing any opinion on other issues raised by both the sides,

as this Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain the present matter of this nature and also liberty is granted to the I Party to

raise the dispute before the proper, competent and appropriate Judicial Forum/Tribunal/Court within 30 days from the

date of receipt of the present Award passed by this Court, in the best interest of justice, equity and fair play.