6658 GI/2017

(313)

jftLVªh la- Mh- ,y- (,u) 04@0007@2003µ05 REGD. NO. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05

izkf/dkj ls izdkf'kr

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

lkIrkfgd

WEEKLY

la- 34]

ubZ fnYyh] uoEcj 19—uoEcj 25] 2017] 'kfuokj@dkfrZd 28—vxzgk;.k 4] 1939

No. 34]

NEW DELHI, NOVEMBER 19— NOVEMBER 25, 2017, SATURDAY/KARTIKA 28— AGRAHAYANA 4, 1939

bl Hkkx esa fHkUu i`"B la[;k nh tkrh gS ftlls fd ;g i`Fkd ladyu ds :i esa j[kk tk lds

Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

Hkkx II—[k.M 3—mi&[k.M (iii)

PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (iii)

dsUæh; vf/dkfj;ksa (la?k jkT; {ks=k iz'kkluksa dks NksM+dj) }kjk tkjh fd, x, lk/kj.k vkns'k vkSj vf/lwpuk,a

Orders and Notifications issued by the Central Authorities (Other than the Administrations of Union Territories)

Hkkjr fuokZpu vk;ksx

ubZ fnYyh] 16 uoEcj] 2017

vk-v- 72-&fuokZpu vthZ la[;k 2@2014 esa iVuk mPp U;k;ky; ds rkjh[k 28 ekpZ] 2017 ds

fu.kZ; ds fo:) nkf[ky dh xbZ flfoy vihy la[;k 2017 dk 5744 esa Hkkjr mPpre U;k;ky; ds fnukad 28

tqykbZ] 2017 ds fu.kZ; dks yksd izfrfuf/kRo vf/kfu;e] 1951 ¼1951 dk 43½ dh /kkjk 116x ¼2½¼[k½ ds vuqlj.k

esa fuokZpu vk;ksx ,rn~}kjk izdkf’kr djrk gSA

¼vkns’k vaxzsth Hkkx esa Nik gSA½

[la- 82@chvkj&,pih@bZ,l&1@bZih@¼2@2014½@2017]

vkns’k ls]

lqfer eq[kthZ] Ikz/kku lfpo

314 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 25, 2017/AGRAHAYANA 4, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(iii)]

ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA

New Delhi, the 16th November, 2017

O.N. 72.—In pursuance of clause (b) sub-section 2 of Section 116C of Representation of the People Act, 1951

(43 of 1951), the Election Commission hereby publishes the Order dated 28^th July, 2017 of the Supreme Court of India

in Civil Appeal No. 5744 of 2017 filed against the Judgement, date 23^rd March, 2017 of the High Court of Judicature at

Patna in Election Petition No. 2 of 2014.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO (s) . 5744 OF 2017

SATYA NAND SHARMA

Appellant (s)

VERSUS

KAUSHLENDRA KUMAR AND ORS.

Respondent (s)

ORDER

We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. We do not see any cogent reason to

entertain the appeal. The judgment impugned does not warrant any interference.

The appeal is dismissed.

-Sd.-

…………………….. J.

(J. CHELAMESWAR)

-Sd.-

…………………….. J.

(S. ABDUL NAZEER)

NEW DELHI

JULY 28, 2017

-Sd.-

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

PATNA HIGH COURT, PATNA

[No. 82/BR-HP/ES-1/EP/(2/2014)/2017]

By Order,

SUMIT MUKHERJEE, Principal Secy.

Uploaded by Dte. of Printing at Government of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi-110064

and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi-110054.

RAKESH

SUKUL

Digitally signed by

RAKESH SUKUL

Date: 2017.12.11 22:30:07

+05'30'