6 GI/2018
(59)
jftLVªh la- Mh- ,y- (,u) 04@0007@2003µ05
REGD. No. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05
izkf/dkj ls izdkf'kr
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
lkIrkfgd
WEEKLY
la- 2]
ubZ fnYyh] tuojh 7—tuojh 13] 2018] 'kfuokj@ ikS"k 17—ikS"k 23] 1939
No. 2]
NEW DELHI, JANUARY 7—JANUARY 13, 2018, SATURDAY/PAUSHA 17—PAUSHA 23, 1939
bl Hkkx esa fHkUu i`"B la[;k nh tkrh gS ftlls fd ;g i`Fkd ladyu ds :i esa j[kk tk lds
Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation
Hkkx II—[k.M 3—mi&[k.M (ii)
PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)
Hkkjr ljdkj ds ea=kky;ksa (j{kk ea=kky; dks NksM+dj) }kjk tkjh fd, x, lkafof/d vkns'k vkSj vf/lwpuk,a
Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India
(Other than the Ministry of Defence)
fons'k ea=kky;
(lh-ih-oh- izHkkx)
ubZ fnYyh] 3 tuojh] 2018
dk-vk- 30-—jktuf;d vkSj dksalqyh; vf/dkjh ('kiFk ,oa iQhl) ds vf/fu;e] 1948 (1948 dk 41) dh /kjk 2 ds [akM
(d) ds vuqlj.k esa oS/kfud vkns'k A
,rn~}kjk dsaæ ljdkj Hkkjr ds nwrkokl] cS:r esa Jh fnyhi dkSy] lgk;d vuqHkkx vf/dkjh dks fnukad 3 tuojh] 2018 ls
lgk;d dksalqyj vf/dkjh ds rkSj ij dksalqyj lsokvksa ds fuoZgu ds fy, izkfèkd`r djrh gS A
¹la- Vh&4330@01@2016º
izdk'k pUn] funs'kd (dksalqyj)
MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS
(C.P.V. DIVISION)
New Delhi, the 3rd January, 2018
S.O. 30.—In pursuance of the clause (a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular Officers (Oaths and
Fees) Act, 1948 (41 of 1948), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Dileep Koul, Assistant Section Officer as
60
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Assistant Consular Officer in Embassy of India, Beirut to perform the Consular services as with effect from
3rd January, 2018.
[No. T-4330/01/2016]
PRAKASH CHAND, Director (Consular)
ubZ fnYyh] 8 tuojh] 2018
dk-vk- 31-—jktuf;d vkSj dksalqyh; vf/dkjh ('kiFk ,oa iQhl) ds vf/fu;e] 1948 (1948 dk 41) dh /kjk 2 ds [akM
(d) ds vuqlj.k esa oS/kfud vkns'k A ,rn~}kjk dsaæ ljdkj Hkkjr ds iz/ku dksalykokl] tsíkg esa Jh lquhy Jh d.kZ] futh lgk;d
dks fnukad 8 tuojh] 2018 ls lgk;d dksalqyj vf/dkjh ds rkSj ij dksalqyj lsokvksa ds fuoZgu ds fy, izkfèkd`r djrh gS A
¹la- Vh&4330@01@2015º
izdk'k pUn] funs'kd (dksalqyj)
New Delhi, the 8th January, 2018
S.O. 31.—In pursuance of the clause (a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular Officers (Oaths and
Fees) Act, 1948 (41 of 1948), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri SUNIL S. KARN, Personal Assistant as
Assistant Consular Officer in Consulate General of India, Jeddah to perform the Consular services as with effect from
8th January, 2018.
[No. T-4330/01/2015]
PRAKASH CHAND, Director (Consular)
िव मंालय
िव मंालय
िव मंालय
िव मंालय
(िवीय सेवाएं िवभाग
िवीय सेवाएं िवभाग
िवीय सेवाएं िवभाग
िवीय सेवाएं िवभाग)
नई दली, 27 दस बर, 2017
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 32
32
32
32.—राीयकृत बक (बंध और कण उपबंध) कम, 1980 के खंड (9) के उप-खंड (2) क मद (ख) के साथ प!ठत
बककारी कंपनी (उप$म% का अजन और अंतरण) अिधिनयम, 1980 (1980 का 40) क धारा 9 क उप-धारा (3) के खंड (छ) ,ारा
द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए, के56ीय सरकार, एत7ारा, 8ी शैलेश रामजी घेदया (ज5म ितिथः 25.04.1957) को उनक िनयुि0
क अिधसूचना क तारीख से तीन वष क अविध के िलए अथवा अगले आदेश% तक, जो भी पहले हो, पंजाब एंड Fसंध बक के िनदेशक
मGडल मH सनदी लेखाकार (चाटड अकाउंटHट) 8ेणी के अंतगत अंशकािलक गैर-सरकारी िनदेशक के पद पर नािमत करती है।
[फा.सं. 6/1/2015-बीओ-I]
Jानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Financial Services)
New Delhi, the 27th December, 2017
S.O. 32.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (g) of sub-section (3) of Section 9 of the Banking
Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1980 (40 of 1980) read with item (b) of sub-clause (2) of
clause (9) of the Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1980, the Central
Government, hereby nominates Shri Shailesh Ramji Ghedia (DoB: 25.4.1957) as Part-time Non-official Director under
Chartered Accountant category on the Board of Directors of Punjab & Sind Bank for a period of three years, from the
date of notification of his appointment or until further orders, whichever is earlier.
[F. No. 6/1/2015-BO-I]
JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
61
नई दली, 27 दस बर, 2017
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 33
33
33
33.—राीयकृत बक (बंध और कण उपबंध) कम, 1980 के खंड (9) के उप-खंड (2) क मद (ख) के साथ प!ठत
बककारी कंपनी (उप$म% का अजन और अंतरण) अिधिनयम, 1980 (1980 का 40) क धारा 9 क उप-धारा (3) के खंड (छ) ,ारा
द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए, के56ीय सरकार, एत7ारा, 8ी बालगोपाल महापाKा (ज5म ितिथः 12.07.1959) को उनक िनयुि0
क अिधसूचना क तारीख से तीन वष क अविध के िलए अथवा अगले आदेश% तक, जो भी पहले हो, आ5Lा बक के िनदेशक मGडल मH
सनदी लेखाकार (चाटड अकाउंटHट) 8ेणी के अंतगत अंशकािलक गैर-सरकारी िनदेशक के पद पर नािमत करती है।
[फा.सं. 6/1/2015-बीओ-I]
Jानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 27th December, 2017
S.O. 33.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (g) of sub-section (3) of Section 9 of the Banking
Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1980 (40 of 1980) read with item (b) of sub-clause (2) of
clause (9) of the Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1980, the Central
Government, hereby nominates Shri Balgopal Mahapatra (DoB: 12.7.1959) as Part-time Non-official Director under
Chartered Accountant category on the Board of Directors of Andhra Bank for a period of three years, from the date of
notification of his appointment or until further orders, whichever is earlier.
[F. No. 6/1/2015-BO-I]
JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.
नई दली, 27 दस बर, 2017
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 34
34
34
34.—राीयकृत बक (बंध और कण उपबंध) कम, 1980 के खंड (9) के उप-खंड (2) क मद (ख) के साथ प!ठत
बककारी कंपनी (उप$म% का अजन और अंतरण) अिधिनयम, 1980 (1980 का 40) क धारा 9 क उप-धारा (3) के खंड (छ) ,ारा
द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए, के56ीय सरकार, एत7ारा, 8ी के. 8ीिनवास मूNत (ज5म ितिथः 19.11.1964) को उनक िनयुि0 क
अिधसूचना क तारीख से तीन वष क अविध के िलए अथवा अगले आदेश% तक, जो भी पहले हो, कापOरेशन बक के िनदेशक मGडल मH
सनदी लेखाकार (चाटड अकाउंटHट) 8ेणी के अंतगत अंशकािलक गैर-सरकारी िनदेशक के पद पर नािमत करती है।
[फा.सं. 6/1/2015-बीओ-I]
Jानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 27th December, 2017
S.O. 34.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (g) of sub-section (3) of Section 9 of the Banking
Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1980 (40 of 1980) read with item (b) of sub-clause (2) of
clause (9) of The Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1980, the Central
Government, hereby nominates Shri K. Srinivasa Murthy (DoB: 19.11.1964) as Part-time Non-official Director under
Chartered Accountant category on the Board of Directors of Corporation Bank for a period of three years, from the
date of notification of his appointment or until further orders, whichever is earlier.
[F. No. 6/1/2015-BO-I]
JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.
नई दली, 27 दस बर, 2017
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 35
35
35
35.—राीयकृत बक (बंध और कण उपबंध) कम, 1970 के खंड (9) के उप-खंड (2) क मद (ख) के साथ प!ठत
बककारी कंपनी (उप$म% का अजन और अंतरण) अिधिनयम, 1970 (1970 का 5) क धारा 9 क उप-धारा (3) के खंड (छ) ,ारा द-
शि0य% का योग करते 3ए, के56ीय सरकार, एत7ारा, 8ी दनेश Fसंह (ज5म ितिथः 22.10.1969) को उनक िनयुि0 क अिधसूचना
क तारीख से तीन वष क अविध के िलए अथवा अगले आदेश% तक, जो भी पहले हो, युनाइटेड बक आफ इंिडया के िनदेशक मGडल मH
सनदी लेखाकार (चाटड अकाउंटHट) 8ेणी के अंतगत अंशकािलक गैर-सरकारी िनदेशक के पद पर नािमत करती है।
[फा.सं. 6/1/2015-बीओ-I]
Jानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव
62
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
New Delhi, the 27th December, 2017
S.O. 35.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (g) of sub-section (3) of Section 9 of the Banking
Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 (5 of 1970) read with item (b) of sub-clause (2) of
clause (9) of the Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970, the Central
Government, hereby nominates Shri Denesh Singh (DoB: 22.10.1969) as Part-time Non-official Director under
Chartered Accountant category on the Board of Directors of United Bank of India for a period of three years, from the
date of notification of his appointment or until further orders, whichever is earlier.
[F. No. 6/1/2015-BO-I]
JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.
नई दली, 27 दस बर, 2017
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 36
36
36
36.—राीयकृत बक (बंध और कण उपबंध) कम, 1980 के खंड (9) के उप-खंड (2) क मद (ख) के साथ प!ठत
बककारी कंपनी (उप$म% का अजन और अंतरण) अिधिनयम, 1980 (1980 का 40) क धारा 9 क उप-धारा (3) के खंड (छ) ,ारा
द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए, के56ीय सरकार, एत7ारा, 8ी िववेक सोनी (ज5म ितिथः 24.07.1962) को उनक िनयुि0 क
अिधसूचना क तारीख से तीन वष क अविध के िलए अथवा अगले आदेश% तक, जो भी पहले हो, िवजया बक के िनदेशक मGडल मH
सनदी लेखाकार (चाटड अकाउंटHट) 8ेणी के अंतगत अंशकािलक गैर-सरकारी िनदेशक के पद पर नािमत करती है।
[फा.सं. 6/1/2015-बीओ-I]
Jानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 27th December, 2017
S.O. 36.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (g) of sub-section (3) of Section 9 of the Banking
Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1980 (40 of 1980) read with item (b) of sub-clause (2) of
clause (9) of the Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1980, the Central
Government, hereby nominates Shri Vivek Soni (DoB: 24.7.1962) as Part-time Non-official Director under Chartered
Accountant category on the Board of Directors of Vijaya Bank for a period of three years, from the date of notification
of his appointment or until further orders, whichever is earlier.
[F. No. 6/1/2015-BO-I]
JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.
नई दली, 27 दस बर, 2017
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 37
37
37
37.—राीयकृत बक (बंध और कण उपबंध) कम, 1980 के खंड (3) के उप-खंड (1) के साथ प!ठत बककारी
कंपनी (उप$म% का अजन और अंतरण) अिधिनयम, 1980 (1980 का 40) क धारा 9 क उप-धारा (3) के खंड (ज) और उप-धारा (3-
क) ,ारा द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए, के56ीय सरकार, एत7ारा, 8ी मधु सूदन दादु (ज5म ितिथः 05.06.1963) को उनक
िनयुि0 क अिधसूचना क तारीख से तीन वष क अविध के िलए अथवा अगले आदेश% तक, जो भी पहले हो, पंजाब एंड Fसंध बक के
िनदेशक मGडल मH अंशकािलक गैर-सरकारी िनदेशक के पद पर नािमत करती है।
[फा.सं. 6/1/2015-बीओ-I]
Jानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 27th December, 2017
S.O. 37.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (h) of sub-section (3) and sub-section (3-A) of section
9 of The Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1980 (40 of 1980) read with sub-clause
(1) of clause (3) of the Nationalized Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1980, the Central
Government hereby nominates Shri Madhu Sudan Dadu (DoB: 5.6.1963) as Part-time Non-official Director on the
Board of Directors of Punjab & Sind Bank for a period of three years, from the date of notification of his appointment
or until further orders, whichever is earlier.
[F. No. 6/1/2015-BO-I]
JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
63
नई दली, 27 दस बर, 2017
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 38
38
38
38.—राीयकृत बक (बंध और कण उपबंध) कम, 1970 के खंड (3) के उप-खंड (1) के साथ प!ठत बककारी
कंपनी (उप$म% का अजन और अंतरण) अिधिनयम, 1970 (1970 का 5) क धारा 9 क उप-धारा (3) के खंड (ज) और उप-धारा (3-
क) ,ारा द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए, के56ीय सरकार, एत7ारा, 8ी आशीष साहा (ज5म ितिथः 08.10.1954) को उनक िनयुि0
क अिधसूचना क तारीख से तीन वष क अविध के िलए अथवा अगले आदेश% तक, जो भी पहले हो, यूको बक के िनदेशक मGडल मH
अंशकािलक गैर-सरकारी िनदेशक के पद पर नािमत करती है।
[फा.सं. 6/1/2015-बीओ-I]
Jानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 27th December, 2017
S.O. 38.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (h) of sub-section (3) and sub-section (3-A) of section
9 of The Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 (5 of 1970) read with sub-clause
(1) of clause (3) of the Nationalized Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970, the Central
Government hereby nominates Shri Asish Saha (DoB: 8.10.1954) as Part-time Non-official Director on the Board of
Directors of UCO Bank for a period of three years, from the date of notification of his appointment or until further
orders, whichever is earlier.
[F. No. 6/1/2015-BO-I]
JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.
नई दली, 27 दस बर, 2017
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 39
39
39
39.—राीयकृत बक (बंध और कण उपबंध) कम, 1970 के खंड (3) के उप-खंड (1) के साथ प!ठत बककारी
कंपनी (उप$म% का अजन और अंतरण) अिधिनयम, 1970 (1970 का 5) क धारा 9 क उप-धारा (3) के खंड (ज) और उप-धारा (3-
क) ,ारा द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए, के56ीय सरकार, एत7ारा, सु8ी मधुर वामीनाथन (ज5म ितिथः 23.02.1961) को उनक
िनयुि0 क अिधसूचना क तारीख से तीन वष क अविध के िलए अथवा अगले आदेश% तक, जो भी पहले हो, यूिनयन बक आफ इंिडया
के िनदेशक मGडल मH अंशकािलक गैर-सरकारी िनदेशक के पद पर नािमत करती है।
[फा.सं. 6/1/2015-बीओ-I]
Jानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 27th December, 2017
S.O. 39.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (h) of sub-section (3) and sub-section (3-A) of section
9 of The Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 (5 of 1970) read with sub-clause
(1) of clause (3) of the Nationalized Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970, the Central
Government hereby nominates Ms. Madhura Swaminathan (DoB: 23.2.1961) as Part-time Non-official Director on the
Board of Directors of Union Bank of India for a period of three years, from the date of notification of her appointment
or until further orders, whichever is earlier.
[F. No. 6/1/2015-BO-I]
JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.
नई दली, 27 दस बर, 2017
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 40
40
40
40.—राीयकृत बक (बंध और कण उपबंध) कम, 1980 के खंड (3) के उप-खंड (1) के साथ प!ठत बककारी
कंपनी (उप$म% का अजन और अंतरण) अिधिनयम, 1980 (1980 का 40) क धारा 9 क उप-धारा (3) के खंड (ज) और उप-धारा
(3-क) ,ारा द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए, के56ीय सरकार, एत7ारा, 8ी िशवरमन अनंत नारायण (ज5म ितिथः 29.09.1950) को
उनक िनयुि0 क अिधसूचना क तारीख से तीन वष क अविध के िलए अथवा अगले आदेश% तक, जो भी पहले हो, इिGडयन ओवरसीज
बक के िनदेशक मGडल मH अंशकािलक गैर-सरकारी िनदेशक के पद पर नािमत करती है।
[फा.सं. 6/1/2015-बीओ-I]
Jानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव
64
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
New Delhi, the 27th December, 2017
S.O. 40.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (h) of sub-section (3) and sub-section (3-A) of section
9 of The Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1980 (40 of 1980) read with sub-clause
(1) of clause (3) of the Nationalized Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1980, the Central
Government hereby nominates Shri Sivaraman Anant Narayan (DoB: 29.9.1950) as Part-time Non-official Director on
the Board of Directors of Indian Overseas Bank for a period of three years, from the date of notification of his
appointment or until further orders, whichever is earlier.
[F. No. 6/1/2015-BO-I]
JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.
नई दली, 27 दस बर, 2017
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 41
41
41
41.—राीयकृत बक (बंध और कण उपबंध) कम, 1970 के खंड (3) के उप-खंड (1) के साथ प!ठत बककारी
कंपनी (उप$म% का अजन और अंतरण) अिधिनयम, 1970 (1970 का 5) क धारा 9 क उप-धारा (3) के खंड (ज) और उप-धारा
(3-क) ,ारा द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए, के56ीय सरकार, एत7ारा, 8ी िसTाथ धान (ज5म ितिथः 12.06.1952) को उनक
िनयुि0 क अिधसूचना क तारीख से तीन वष क अविध के िलए अथवा अगले आदेश% तक, जो भी पहले हो, युनाइटेड बक आफ इंिडया
के िनदेशक मGडल मH अंशकािलक गैर-सरकारी िनदेशक के पद पर नािमत करती है।
[फा.सं. 6/1/2015-बीओ-I]
Jानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 27th December, 2017
S.O. 41.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (h) of sub-section (3) and sub-section (3-A) of section
9 of The Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 (5 of 1970) read with sub-clause
(1) of clause (3) of the Nationalized Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970, the Central
Government hereby nominates Shri Sidhartha Pradhan (DoB: 12.6.1952) as Part-time Non-official Director on the
Board of Directors of United Bank of India for a period of three years, from the date of notification of his appointment
or until further orders, whichever is earlier.
[F. No. 6/1/2015-BO-I]
JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.
नई दली, 27 दस बर, 2017
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 42
42
42
42.—राीयकृत बक (बंध और कण उपबंध) कम, 1970 के खंड (3) के उप-खंड (1) के साथ प!ठत बककारी
कंपनी (उप$म% का अजन और अंतरण) अिधिनयम, 1970 (1970 का 5) क धारा 9 क उप-धारा (3) के खंड (ज) और उप-धारा
(3-क) ,ारा द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए, के56ीय सरकार, एत7ारा, डॉ. आVमानंद (ज5म ितिथः 30.06.1959) को उनक िनयुि0
क अिधसूचना क तारीख से तीन वष क अविध के िलए अथवा अगले आदेश% तक, जो भी पहले हो, से5Wल बक आफ इंिडया के िनदेशक
मGडल मH अंशकािलक गैर-सरकारी िनदेशक के पद पर नािमत करती है।
[फा.सं. 6/1/2015-बीओ-I]
Jानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 27th December, 2017
S.O. 42.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (h) of sub-section (3) and sub-section (3-A) of section
9 of The Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 (5 of 1970) read with sub-clause
(1) of clause (3) of the Nationalized Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970, the Central
Government hereby nominates Dr Atmanand (DoB: 30.6.1959) as Part-time Non-official Director on the Board of
Directors of Central Bank of India for a period of three years, from the date of notification of his appointment or until
further orders, whichever is earlier.
[F. No. 6/1/2015-BO-I]
JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
65
नई दली, 27 दस बर, 2017
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.43
43
43
43 .—राीयकृत बक (बंध और कण उपबंध) कम, 1970 के खंड (3) के उप-खंड (1) के साथ प!ठत बककारी
कंपनी (उप$म% का अजन और अंतरण) अिधिनयम, 1970 (1970 का 5) क धारा 9 क उप-धारा (3) के खंड (ज) और उप-धारा (3-
क) ,ारा द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए, के56ीय सरकार, एत7ारा, 8ी सिलल कुमार झा (ज5म ितिथः 18.07.1953) को उनक
िनयुि0 क अिधसूचना क तारीख से तीन वष क अविध के िलए अथवा अगले आदेश% तक, जो भी पहले हो, इंिडयन बक के िनदेशक
मGडल मH अंशकािलक गैर-सरकारी िनदेशक के पद पर नािमत करती है।
[फा.सं. 6/1/2015-बीओ-I]
Jानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 27th December, 2017
S.O. 43.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (h) of sub-section (3) and sub-section (3-A) of section
9 of The Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 (5 of 1970) read with sub-clause
(1) of clause (3) of the Nationalized Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970, the Central
Government hereby nominates Shri Salil Kumar Jha (DoB: 18.7.1953) as Part-time Non-official Director on the Board
of Directors of Indian Bank for a period of three years, from the date of notification of his appointment or until further
orders, whichever is earlier.
[F. No. 6/1/2015-BO-I]
JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.
नई दली, 1 जनवरी, 2018
का
का
का
का.आ.
आ.
आ.
आ. 44
44
44
44.—भारतीय लघु उYोग िवकास बक अिधिनयम, 1989 (1989 का 39) क धारा 6 क उप-धारा (1) के खंड (ग)
,ारा द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए, के5 6ीय सरकार, एत7ारा, 8ी सुरे5 6 नाथ िKपाठी के थान पर 8ी राम मोहन िम8ा, अपर
सिचव एवं िवकास आयु\ त, सू] म, लघु एवं म^ यम उYम मंKालय को तV काल भाव से अगले आदेश% तक, भारतीय लघु उYोग िवकास
बक (िसडबी) के िनदेशक मंडल मH सरकारी नािमती िनदेशक िनयु0 करती है।
[फा.सं. 17/15/2017-आईएफ-II]
सौ यिजत घोष, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 1st January, 2018
S.O. 44.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of Section (6) of the Small
Industries Development Bank of India Act, 1989 (39 of 1989), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Ram
Mohan Mishra, Additional Secretary & Development Commissioner, Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium
Enterprises, as Central Government nominee Director on the Board of Directors of Small Industries Development Bank
of India (SIDBI) with immediate effect vice Shri Surendra Nath Tripathi, until further orders.
[F. No. 17/15/2017-IF-II]
SOUMYAJIT GHOSH, Under Secy.
वा
वा
वा
वा य
य
य
य और परवार क या
और परवार क या
और परवार क या
और परवार क याण मंालय
ण मंालय
ण मंालय
ण मंालय
( वा
( वा
( वा
( वा य
य
य
य एवं परवार क या
एवं परवार क या
एवं परवार क या
एवं परवार क याण िवभाग)
ण िवभाग)
ण िवभाग)
ण िवभाग)
नई द ली, 5 जनवरी, 2018
का
का
का
का.आ.
आ.
आ.
आ. 45
45
45
45.—जबक, भारतीय िचकV सा प!रषद~ (संशोधन) अ^ यादेश; 2013 क धारा 3क क उप-धारा (1) ,ारा दV त
शि0य% का उपयोग करते 3ए 05 नव बर, 2013 को, भारतीय िचकV सा प!रषद् का पुनगठन कया गया था;
66
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
और जबक भारतीय िचकV सा अिधिनयम, 1956 (1956 का 102) क धारा 3 क उप-धारा (1) (ख) के ावधान के
अनुसरण मH, तीथeकर महावीर िवf विवYालय, मुरादाबाद का ितिनिधV व कर रहे डॉ. वेद काश िम8ा को 27.03.2014 से भारतीय
िचकV सा प!रषद् के सद य के gप मH चुना गया था;
और जबक भारतीय िचकV सा प!रषद् अिधिनयम, 1956 (1956 का 102) क धारा 3 क उप-धारा (1) के खंड (क) के
अनुसरण मH तथा संबंिधत राh य सरकार के साथ परामश करके के5 6ीय सरकार ने डॉ. कशोर बी. ताओरी का देहा5 त होने के कारण
!र\ त 3ए आकिमक पद पर इस अिधसूचना के जारी होने क ितिथ से डॉ. कशोर बी. ताओरी क शेष अविध अथात् 04.11.2018 तक
के िलए डॉ. वेद काश िम8ा को भारतीय िचकV सा प!रषद् का सद य मनोनीत कया है।
और जबक, डॉ. वेद काश िम8ा ने आईएमसी अिधिनयम, 1956 क धारा 3(1)(क) के तहत राh य का ितिनिधV व करने
हेतु एमसीआई का सद य बनने के िलए अपनी सहमित दे दी है और आईएमसी अिधिनयम, 1956 क धारा 5(2) के अनुसार, कोई
j यि0 एक ही समय पर सद य के gप मH एक से अिधक पद% पर नहk रह सकता। अत: आईएमसी अिधिनयम, 1956 क धारा 7(3) मH
िनिहत ावधान% के अनुसरण मH आईएमसी अिधिनयम, 1956 क धारा 3(1)(ख) के तहत तीथeकर महावीर िवf विवYालय, मुरादाबाद
का ितिनिधV व कर रहे डॉ. वेद काश िम8ा को भारतीय िचकV सा प!रषद् क सद यता समाn त हो गई है।
अत: अब तीथeकर महावीर िवf विवYालय, मुरादाबाद का ितिनिधV व कर रहे डॉ. वेद काश िम8ा क भारतीय िचकV सा
प!रषद् क सद यता समाn त मानी जाएगी।
और, इसिलए, उ\ त अिधिनयम क धारा 3 क उप-धारा (1) के ावधान के अनुसरण मH के5 6ीय सरकार एत7ारा तV कालीन
वा o य मंKालय क दनांक 9 जनवरी, 1960 क सां.आ. 138 मH भारत सरकार क अिधसूचना मH िन निलिखत संशोधन करती है,
नामत;
वा o य और प!रवार क याण मंKालय सं. सां.आ. 3323 (ई) दनांक 06 नव बर, 2013 मH भारत सरकार क अिधसूचना
तथा उसमH कए गए संशोधन%, अंितम िविp के पf चात तथा उससे संबंिधत िविp मH िन निलिखत जोड़ा जाएगा, नामत:
.सं.
.सं.
.सं.
.सं.
रा य
रा य
रा य
रा य सरकार का नाम
सरकार का नाम
सरकार का नाम
सरकार का नाम
नािमत सद य
नािमत सद य
नािमत सद य
नािमत सद य का यौ
का यौ
का यौ
का यौरा
रारा
रा
14
महाराq W
डॉ. वेद काश िम8ा
[सं. वी-11013/01/2016-एमईपी]
डी. वी. के. राव, अवर सिचव
MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE
(Department of Health and Family Welfare)
New Delhi, the 5th January, 2018
S.O. 45.—Whereas on 5th November, 2013, the Medical Council of India was re-constituted in exercise of the
powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3A of the Indian Medical Council (Amendment) Ordinance, 2013;
And whereas in pursuance of the provision of sub-section (1)(b) of Section 3 of the Indian Medical Act, 1956
(102 of 1956), Dr. Ved Prakash Mishra was elected as a member of the Medical Council of India representing
Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Moradabad with effect from 27.03.2014;
And whereas the Central Government, in pursuance of clause (a) of sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Indian
Medical Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956) and in consultation with the respective State Government has nominated Dr.
Ved Prakash Mishra to be a member of the Medical Council of India against the casual vacancy formed due to demise
of Dr. Kishor B. Taori for the remainder of the term of Dr. Kishor B. Taori i.e. upto 04.11.2018 with effect from the
date of issue of this notification.
And whereas Dr. Ved Prakash Mishra has given his consent to be a member of MCI representing the State
under Section 3(1)(a) of IMC Act, 1956 and as per Section 5(2) of IMC Act, 1956, any person at the same time may not
serve as a member in more than one capacity. Therefore, Dr. Ved Prakash Mishra has ceased to be a member of
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
67
Medical Council of India representing Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Moradabad under section 3(1)(b) of IMC Act,
1956 in accordance with the provisions contained in Section 7(3) of IMC Act, 1956.
Now, therefore, Dr. Ved Prakash Mishra shall be deemed to have ceased to be a member of the Medical
Council of India representing Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Moradabad with effect from 04.01.2018.
And, therefore, in pursuance of the provision of sub section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act the Central
Government hereby makes the following amendment in the Notification of the Government of India in the then
Ministry of Health number S.O. 138 dated the 9th January, 1960, namely;
In the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Health & Family Welfare number S.O.
3323(E) dated 06th November, 2013 and amendments thereto, after the last entry and entry relating thereto, the
following shall be inserted, namely:
S. No.
Name of the State Government
Details of the Nominated
Member
14.
Maharashtra
Dr. Ved Prakash Mishra
[No. V-11013/01/2016-MEP]
D. V. K. RAO, Under Secy.
उपभो ा मामले, खा$ और साव%जिनक िवतरण मंालय
उपभो ा मामले, खा$ और साव%जिनक िवतरण मंालय
उपभो ा मामले, खा$ और साव%जिनक िवतरण मंालय
उपभो ा मामले, खा$ और साव%जिनक िवतरण मंालय
(उपभोा मामले िवभाग)
(उपभोा मामले िवभाग)
(उपभोा मामले िवभाग)
(उपभोा मामले िवभाग)
(भारतीय मानक यूरो
भारतीय मानक यूरो
भारतीय मानक यूरो
भारतीय मानक यूरो)
नई द ली, 22 दस बर, 2017
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 46
46
46
46.— भारतीय मानक r यूरो (माणन) िविनयम 1988 के िविनयम (4) के उपिविनयम (5) के अनुसरण मH भारतीय
मानक r यूरो ,rn~}kjk अिधसूिचत करता है क िजन लाइसHस% के िववरण नीचे अनुसूची मH दए गए ह, वे वीकृत कर दए गए ह:-
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
$म
संs या
लाइसHस संs या
वीकृत करने
क ितिथ
लाइसHसधारी का नाम
व प-ा
भारतीय मानक का
शीषक
भा मा
भाग
अनु
वष
1.
एल-
9512387222
03.08.2017
मै0 िहना इG ड Wीस (ाo)
िलo,
n लॉट नंo 45, सै\ टर - 27ए,
िजला फरीदाबाद - 121003,
ह!रयाणा
िखजाब, तरल, जैल
और $म
8481
-
-
2001
2.
एल-
9512386523
08.08.2017
मै0 आV मा सो परमाV मा WेFडंग,
लोहाg रोड, िसवानी मG डी,
िसवानी,
िजला िभवानी,
ह!रयाणा
खड़ंजे के िलए पूव
ढिलत कं$ट r लॉक
15658
-
-
2006
68
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
3.
एल-
9512386725
08.08.2017
मै0 इएयू बाFथंग सोलूशनस
ाo िलo ,
िबनोला इG ड Wीयल ए!रया
भौरा कलां,
फgक नगर,
िजला xqM+xk¡o - 122413,
ह!रयाणा
जल कायu के िलए
तांबा िम8धातु
सजावटी एक ट%टी,
संयोिजत ट%टी
समुv चय और रोक
वा व
8931
-
-
1993
4.
एल-
9590001818
08.08.2017
मै0 नीरज h वैलस,
7271, गुड़ बाजार,
िजला रेवाड़ी – 123401,
ह!रयाणा
वण एवं वण
िम8धातु
आभूषण/िश प
व तुx –
महीनता एवं
मुहरांकन
1417
-
-
2016
5.
एल-
9590001919
08.08.2017
मै0 बाबू लाल राजेश कुमार
सोनी,
बूरा बाज़ार,
िजला रेवाड़ी,
ह!रयाणा
वण एवं वण
िम8धातु
आभूषण/िश प
व तुx –
महीनता एवं
मुहरांकन
1417
-
-
2016
6.
एल-
9590002020
08.08.2017
मै0 बाबू लाल राजेश कुमार
सोनी,
बूरा बाज़ार,
िजला रेवाड़ी,
ह!रयाणा
चyदी एवं चyदी
िम8धातु
आभूषण/िश प
व तुx –
महीनता एवं
मुहरांकन
2112
-
-
2014
7.
एल-
9590002121
08.08.2017
मै0 दलीप h वैलस,
वाड नं0 3, टोडापुर रोड, हेली
मG डी,
िजला xqM+xk¡o,
ह!रयाणा
वण एवं वण
िम8धातु
आभूषण/िश प
व तुx –
महीनता एवं
मुहरांकन
1417
-
-
2016
8.
एल-
9590002222
08.08.2017
मै0 दीप h वैलस,
गुड़ बाज़ार,
िजला रेवाड़ी – 123401,
ह!रयाणा
वण एवं वण
िम8धातु
आभूषण/िश प
व तुx –
महीनता एवं
मुहरांकन
1417
-
-
2016
9.
एल-
9590002323
08.08.2017
मै0 दीप h वैलस,
गुड़ बाज़ार,
िजला रेवाड़ी – 123401,
ह!रयाणा
चyदी एवं चyदी
िम8धातु
आभूषण/िश प
व तुx –
महीनता एवं
मुहरांकन
2112
-
-
2014
10.
एल-
9590002424
08.08.2017
मै0 दलीप h वैलस,
वाड नं0 3, टोडापुर रोड, हेली
मG डी,
िजला xqM+xk¡o,
ह!रयाणा
चyदी एवं चyदी
िम8धातु
आभूषण/िश प
व तुx –
महीनता एवं
मुहरांकन
2112
-
-
2014
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
69
11.
एल-
9590002517
16.08.2017
मै0 8ी जी h वैलस,
शॉप-1, बेसमHट, लाला मनीराम
माzकट 2nd, मेन बाज़ार,
धाgहेड़ा,
िजला रेवाड़ी – 123106,
ह!रयाणा
वण एवं वण
िम8धातु
आभूषण/िश प
व तुx –
महीनता एवं
मुहरांकन
1417
-
-
2116
12.
एल-
9512386919
17.08.2017
मै0 अरावली को-ऑपरे!टव
लेबर एG ड कं W\ शन िलo,
गyव व डाकघर पाली, एन.
आई. टी.,
िजला फरीदाबाद - 121004,
ह!रयाणा
खड़ंजे के िलए पूव
ढिलत कं$ट r लॉक
15658
-
-
2006
13.
एल-
9512387020
21.08.2017
मै0 जे. एम. टाइ स,
गyव करनेरा, समयपुर सोहना
रोड,
सै\ टर – 56 के नज़दीक,
िजला फरीदाबाद – 121004,
ह!रयाणा
खड़ंजे के िलए पूव
ढिलत कं$ट r लॉक
15658
-
-
2006
14.
एल-
9590002618
23.08.2017
मै0 ज़ेवर पैलेस,
शॉप नं0 4ए, एनएच-2, 1-2
चौक,
एन. आई. टी.,
िजला फरीदाबाद,
ह!रयाणा
चyदी एवं चyदी
िम8धातु
आभूषण/िश प
व तुx –
महीनता एवं
मुहरांकन
2112
-
-
2014
15.
एल-
9512387121
24.08.2017
मै0 गौरव इ5 टराइिसस,
44 केएम टोन, एनएच-2,
बराज़र फाम हाउस के पीछे,
गyव सीकरी, ब लभगढ़,
िजला फरीदाबाद,
ह!रयाणा
खड़ंजे के िलए पूव
ढिलत कं$ट r लॉक
15658
-
-
2006
16.
एल-
9512387820
24.08.2017
मै0 अतुल पाइप कॉरपोरेशन,
रेलवे $ाFसंग के नज़दीक,
मेन रोहतक रोड,,
चरखी दादरी,
िजला िभवानी – 127306,
ह!रयाणा
पूवढिलत कं$ट
पाइप (बलन सिहत
और रिहत)
458
-
-
2003
17.
एल-
9590002719
24.08.2017
मै0 ओम िशवशंकर h वैलस,
शॉप नं0 549, सारन कूल
रोड,
िबq ट कूल के नज़दीक,
पवितया कालोनी,
िजला फरीदाबाद – 121005,
ह!रयाणा
वण एवं वण
िम8धातु
आभूषण/िश प
व तुx –
महीनता एवं
मुहरांकन
1417
-
-
2016
70
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
18.
एल-
9512387424
25.08.2017
मै0 8ी राजनाथ कं$ट उYोग,
िसवानी राजगढ़ रोड,
गौशाला के नज़दीक, िसवानी,
िजला िभवानी - 127046,
ह!रयाणा
खड़ंजे के िलए पूव
ढिलत कं$ट r लॉक
15658
-
-
2006
[सं. सीएमडी/13 : 11]
एस. के. वमा, वैJािनक ई एवं मुख
MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION
(Department of Consumer Affairs)
(BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS)
New Delhi, the 22nd December, 2017
S.O. 46.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (5) of the regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards
(Certification) Regulation 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies the grant of licence particulars of
which are given in the following schedule:
SCHEDULE
Sl.
No.
Licences
No.
CM/L-
Grant Date
Name & Address of the
Licensee
Title of the Standard
IS
No.
Part
Sec.
Year
1.
L-
9512387222
03.08.2017
M/s.. Henna Industries (P)
Ltd.,
Plot No. 45, Sector – 27A,
Distt. Faridabad - 121003,
Haryana
Oxidation Hair Dyes,
Liquid, Gel and
Cream
8481
-
-
2001
2.
L-
9512386523
08.08.2017
M/s. Atma So Parmatma
Trading,
Loharu Road, Siwani Mandi,
Siwani,
Distt. Bhiwani,
Haryana
Precast Concrete
Blocks for Paving
15658
-
-
2006
3.
L-
9512386725
08.08.2017
M/s. EAU Bathing Solutions
Pvt. Ltd.,
Binola Industrial Area, Bhora
Kalan,
Faruk Nagar,
Distt. Gurgaon - 122413,
Haryana
Copper Alloy Fancy
Single Taps,
Combination tap
assembly and
stop valve for water
services
8931
-
-
1993
4.
L-
9590001818
08.08.2017
M/s. Neeraj Jewelers,
7271, Gur Bazar,
Distt. Rewari - 123401,
Haryana
Gold and Gold
Alloys
Jewellery/Artefacts -
Fineness and
Marking
1417
-
-
2016
5.
L-
9590001919
08.08.2017
M/s. Babu Lal Rajesh Kumar
Soni,
Bura Bazar,
Distt. Rewari,
Haryana
Gold and Gold
Alloys
Jewellery/Artefacts -
Fineness and
Marking
1417
-
-
2016
6.
L-
9590002020
08.08.2017
M/s. Babu Lal Rajesh Kumar
Soni,
Bura Bazar,
Distt. Rewari,
Haryana
Silver and Silver
Alloys
Jewellery/Artefacts -
Fineness and
Marking
2112
-
-
2014
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
71
7.
L-
9590002121
08.08.2017
M/s. Dalip Jewellers,
Ward No.3, Todapur Road,
Haily Mandi,
Distt. Gurgaon,
Haryana
Gold and Gold
Alloys
Jewellery/Artefacts -
Fineness and
Marking
1417
-
-
2016
8.
L-
9590002222
08.08.2017
M/s. Deep Jewellers,
Gur Bazar,
Distt. Rewari - 123401,
Haryana
Gold and Gold
Alloys
Jewellery/Artefacts -
Fineness and
Marking
1417
-
-
2016
9.
L-
9590002323
08.08.2017
M/s. Deep Jewellers,
Gur Bazar,
Distt. Rewari - 123401,
Haryana
Silver and Silver
Alloys
Jewellery/Artefacts -
Fineness and
Marking
2112
-
-
2014
10.
L-
9590002424
08.08.2017
M/s. Dalip Jewellers,
Ward No.3, Todapur Road,
Haily Mandi,
Distt. Gurgaon,
Haryana
Silver and Silver
Alloys
Jewellery/Artefacts -
Fineness and
Marking
2112
-
-
2014
11.
L-
9590002517
16.08.2017
M/s. Shri Ji Jewellers,
Shop No.H-1, Basement,
Lala Maniram Market 2nd,
Main Bazar, Dharuhera,
Distt. Rewari - 123106,
Haryana
Gold and Gold
Alloys
Jewellery/Artefacts -
Fineness and
Marking
1417
-
-
2116
12.
L-
9512386919
17.08.2017
M/s. Aravali Co-Operative
Labour Construction Society
Ltd.,
Village & P.O. Pali, N.I.T.,
Distt. Faridabad - 121004,
Haryana
Precast Concrete
Blocks for Paving
15658
-
-
2006
13.
L-
9512387020
21.08.2017
M/s. J.M. Tiles,
Karnera, Samaypur Sohna
Road,
Near Sector – 56,
Distt. Faridabad - 121004,
Haryana
Precast Concrete
Blocks for Paving
15658
-
-
2006
14.
L-
9590002618
23.08.2017
M/s. Zever Palace,
Shop No.4A, NH-2, 1-2
Chowk, N.I.T.,
Distt. Faridabad,
Haryana
Silver and Silver
Alloys
Jewellery/Artefacts -
Fineness and
Marking
2112
-
-
2014
15.
L-
9512387121
24.08.2017
M/s. Gaurav Enterprises,
44 KM Stone,
Behind Brazar Farm House,
Village Seekri,
Distt. Faridabad,
Haryana
Precast Concrete
Blocks for Paving
15658
-
-
2006
16.
L-
9512387820
24.08.2017
M/s. Atul Pipe Corporation,
Near Railway Crossing,
Main Rohtak Road,
Charkhi Dadri,
Distt. Bhiwani – 127306,
Haryana
Precast Concrete
Pipe
(With and Without
Reinforcement)
458
-
-
2003
72
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
17.
L-
9590002719
24.08.2017
M/s. Om Shivshanker
Jewellers,
Shop No.549, Saran School
Road,
Near Bisht School, Parvatiya
Colony,
Distt. Faridabad - 121005,
Haryana
Gold and Gold
Alloys
Jewellery/Artefacts -
Fineness and
Marking
1417
-
-
2016
18.
L-
9512387424
25.08.2017
M/s. Shree Rajnath Concrete
Udyog,
Siwani Rajgarh Road,
Near Goshala, Siwani,
Distt. Bhiwani - 127046,
Haryana
Precast Concrete
Blocks for Paving
15658
-
-
2006
[No. CMD/13:11]
S. K. VERMA, Scientist E & Head
नई द ली, 22 दस बर, 2017
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 47
47
47
47.— भारतीय मानक r यूरो (माणन) िविनयम 1988 के िविनयम (4) के उपिविनयम (5) के अनुसरण मH भारतीय
मानक r यूरो एतद,ारा अिधसूिचत करता है क िजन लाइसHस% के िववरण नीचे अनुसूची मH दए गए ह, वे वीकृत कर दए गए ह:-
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
$म
संs या
लाइसHस संs या
वीकृत करने
क ितिथ
लाइसHसधारी का नाम
व प-ा
भारतीय मानक का
शीषक
भा मा
भाग
अनु
वष
1.
एल-
9512384721
04.07.2017
मै0 एिशयन सीमHट व\ स,
गyव मेघपुर,
पलवल सोहना रोड,
िजला पलवल - 121102,
ह!रयाणा
खड़ंजे के िलए पूव
ढिलत कं$ट r लॉक
15658
-
-
2006
2.
एल-
9590001018
04.07.2017
मै0 ओमेज़ h वैलरी ाइवेट
िलिम!टड,
1269, सै\ टर-4,
िजला गुड़गyव - 122001,
ह!रयाणा
वण एवं वण
िम8धातु
आभूषण/िश प
व तुx –
महीनता एवं
मुहरांकन
1417
-
-
2016
3.
एल-
9590001119
04.07.2017
मै0 शुभम h वैलस,
गांधी चाक, सदर बाज़ार,
िजला गुड़गyव - 122001,
ह!रयाणा
वण एवं वण
िम8धातु
आभूषण/िश प
व तुx –
महीनता एवं
मुहरांकन
1417
-
-
2016
4.
एल-
9590001220
04.07.2017
मै0 शुभम h वैलस,
गांधी चौक, सदर बाज़ार,
िजला गुड़गyव - 122001,
ह!रयाणा
चyदी एवं चyदी
िम8धातु
आभूषण/िश प
व तुx –
महीनता एवं
मुहरांकन
2112
-
-
2014
5.
एल-
9590001321
04.07.2017
मै0 शगुन h वैलस,
रेलवे रोड,
वण एवं वण
िम8धातु
आभूषण/िश प
1417
-
-
2016
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
73
िजला रोहतक - 124001,
ह!रयाणा
व तुx –
महीनता एवं
मुहरांकन
6.
एल-
9512384822
10.07.2017
मै0 खतरी इ5 टरलो~कंग
टाइ स,
वीपीओ खरक जटान, महम
मीनार के नज़दीक, बसी,
मेहम,
िजला रोहतक - 124514,
ह!रयाणा
खड़ंजे के िलए पूव
ढिलत कं$ट r लॉक
15658
-
-
2006
7.
एल-
9512384923
10.07.2017
मै0 राणा एG ड कौिशक
ुप,
कला नं0 20/2, मु तकल
नं0 47, गyव हरच5 द पुर,
सोहना,
िजला गुड़गyव,
ह!रयाणा
पैकेजब5 द पेय जल
(पैकेजब5 द ाकृितक
िमनरल जल के
अलावा)
14543
-
-
2004
8.
एल-
9512385622
10.07.2017
मै0 जे. के. सीमHट वक स,
झाड़ली मोहनबारी रोड,
झाड़ली, माटनहेल,
झाड़ली,
िजला झh जर - 124106,
ह!रयाणा
साधारण पोटलड
सीमHट
269
-
-
2015
9.
एल-
9512385723
10.07.2017
मै0 8ी जी ीका ट,
गyव व डाकघर िसदीपुरा
लोवा,
बहादुरगढ़,
िजला झh जर -- 124507,
ह!रयाणा
पूव ढिलत कं$ट
मेनहोल के ढ\ कन व
ेम
12592
-
-
2002
10.
एल-
9512385024
11.07.2017
मै0 8ी f याम
इ5 टराइिसस,
एनएच-2, राज थान
मोटल के सामने,
होडल,
िजला पलवल – 121106,
ह!रयाणा
खड़ंजे के िलए पूव
ढिलत कं$ट r लॉक
15658
-
-
2006
11.
एल-
9512385117
13.07.2017
मै0 8ी बालाजी
इ5 टरलो~कंग टाइ स,
वी. पी. ओ. भलोट,
िजला रोहतक,
ह!रयाणा
खड़ंजे के िलए पूव
ढिलत कं$ट r लॉक
15658
-
-
2006
12.
एल-
9590001422
13.07.2017
मै0 सतगुg h वैलस,
ओ ड अनाज मG डी, मेहम,
िजला िभवानी -
वण एवं वण
िम8धातु
आभूषण/िश प
1417
-
-
2016
74
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
124112,
ह!रयाणा
व तुx –
महीनता एवं
मुहरांकन
13.
एल-
9512385218
14.07.2017
मै0 8ी ओम इ5 टराइिसस,
गyव का5 हावास, पी ओ
संगवारी,
िजला रेवाड़ी – 123401,
ह!रयाणा
खड़ंजे के िलए पूव
ढिलत कं$ट r लॉक
15658
-
-
2006
14.
एल-
9512385319
14.07.2017
मै0 यादव लो~कंग टाइ स
एG ड िबFडंग मैटी!रयल
सपलायर,
गyव सादत नगर,
तहसील कोसली,
िजला रेवाड़ी - 123302,
ह!रयाणा
खड़ंजे के िलए पूव
ढिलत कं$ट r लॉक
15658
-
-
2006
15.
एल-
9512385420
14.07.2017
मै0 जय दुग कं$ट उYोग,
गyव घरौट, तहसील हथीन,
िजला पलवल - 121103,
ह!रयाणा
खड़ंजे के िलए पूव
ढिलत कं$ट r लॉक
15658
-
-
2006
16.
एल-
9512385521
17.07.2017
मै0 ह!रयाणा इलै\ Wीकल
इ\ यूपमHट,
खसरा नंo 104/55,
कला नंo 9/3/1, गyव-
ढोरका, वज़ीरपुर,
िजला गुड़गyव - 123505,
ह!रयाणा
बाहय रंग तेल
इ मेसड िवतरण
Wांसफामर भाग 1
िमनरल तेल
िनिमित
1180
01
-
2014
17.
एल-
9512385925
17.07.2017
मै0 टी.एम.एस.
इ5 टराइिसस,
वीपीओ-लुहारी,
िजला झh जर - 124108,
ह!रयाणा
खड़ंजे के िलए पूव
ढिलत कं$ट r लॉक
15658
-
-
2006
18.
एल-
9512386624
17.07.2017
मै0 बीकेडी बैवरेिजस,
गyव धनकोट, झh जर रोड,
िजला गुड़गyव - 122505,
ह!रयाणा
पैकेजब5 द य जल
(पैकेजब5 द ाकृितक
िमनरल जल के
अलावा)
14543
-
-
2004
19.
एल-
9590001523
17.07.2017
मै0 एम. एल. h वैलस ,
शॉप नं0 एमसीएफ-3712,
33 फुट रोड,
संजय कलोनी, सै\ टर-23,
िजला फरीदाबाद -
121005,
ह!रयाणा
वण एवं वण
िम8धातु
आभूषण/िश प
व तुx –
महीनता एवं
मुहरांकन
1417
-
-
2016
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
75
20.
एल-
9590001624
17.07.2017
मै0 एम. एल. h वैलस ,
शॉप नं0 एमसीएफ-3712,
33 फुट रोड,
संजय कलोनी, सै\ टर-23,
िजला फरीदाबाद -
121005,
ह!रयाणा
चyदी एवं चyदी
िम8धातु
आभूषण/िश प
व तुx –
महीनता एवं
मुहरांकन
2112
-
-
2014
21.
एल-
9512385824
24.07.2017
मै0 अ Wाकोन इ5 ाकेम
(ाo) िलo,
n लॉट नंo 5ए, सै\ टर - 79,
गyव नौरंगपुर,
िजला गुड़गyव - 122050,
ह!रयाणा
कं$ट एडिम\ चर
9103
-
-
1999
22.
एल-
9512386119
25.07.2017
मै0 यूनीक टाइ स
इG ड Wीस,
गyव गरही बोहार,
पी.ओ. अ थल बोहार,
िजला रोहतक - 124521,
ह!रयाणा
खड़ंजे के िलए पूव
ढिलत कं$ट r लॉक
15658
-
-
2006
23.
एल-
9512386321
25.07.2017
मै0 पूजा टाइ स,
गyव नसीबपुर, बरखोदा,
तहसील नारनौल,
िजला महै5 6गढ़ -
123001,
ह!रयाणा
खड़ंजे के िलए पूव
ढिलत कं$ट r लॉक
15658
-
-
2006
24
एल-
9512386018
26.07.2017
मै0 इG डो िसयाम सेफटी
ोड\ टस ाइवेट
िलिम!टड,
n लॉट नं0 149, दूसरा तल,
सै\ टर-7, आईएमटी
मानेसर,
िजला गुड़गyव - 122050,
ह!रयाणा
दुपिहया वाहन
चालक% के िलए
संरी हे मेट
4151
-
-
1993
25.
एल-
9512386220
26.07.2017
मै0 8ी f याम टाइ स एG ड
मैटी!रयल सपलायर,
खाता नं0 421/457,
न5 दरामपुर बास, सलारपुर
मोड़,
धाgहेड़ा,
िजला रेवाड़ी – 123106,
ह!रयाणा
खड़ंजे के िलए पूव
ढिलत कं$ट r लॉक
15658
-
-
2006
76
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
26.
एल-
9512386422
27.07.2017
मै0 िज5 दल सैनीटेरीवेयर
ा0 िल0,
3 केएम माइल टोन,
वीपीओ रोहद,
िजला झh जर - 124501,
ह!रयाणा
कं$ट एडिम\ चर -
सुपर
n ला टीसाइF़जंग
िम8ण (कं$ट
िम8ण के िलए पानी
कम) - सामा5 य
कार
7834
01
-
1987
27.
एल-
9512386826
27.07.2017
मै0 जय बाबा WेFडंग कं0,
चरखी दादरी लाहाg रोड,
गyव हरोदा कलां,
तहसील चरखी दादरी,
िजला िभवानी –
127308,
ह!रयाणा
खड़ंजे के िलए पूव
ढिलत कं$ट r लॉक
15658
-
-
2006
28.
एल-
9590001717
27.07.2017
मै0 राजदीप h वैलस,
5 यू सराफर बाज़ार,
बारा हज़ारी रोड,
िजला रेवाड़ी - 123401,
ह!रयाणा
वण एवं वण
िम8धातु
आभूषण/िश प
व तुx –
महीनता एवं
मुहरांकन
1417
-
-
2016
[सं. सीएमडी/13 : 11]
एस. के. वमा, वैJािनक ई एवं मुख
New Delhi, the 22nd December, 2017
S.O. 47.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (5) of the regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards
(Certification) Regulation 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies the grant of licence particulars of
which are given in the following schedule:
SCHEDULE
Sl.
No.
Licences
No.
CM/L-
Grant Date
Name & Address of the
Licensee
Title of the Standard
IS
No.
Part
Sec.
Year
1.
L-
9512384721
04.07.2017
M/s Asian Cement Works,
Village Meghpur,
Palwal Sohna Road,
Distt. Palwal - 121102,
Haryana
Precast Concrete
Blocks for Paving
15658
-
-
2006
2.
L-
9590001018
04.07.2017
M/s Ornaz Jewellery Private
Limited,
1269, Sector-4,
Distt. Gurgaon - 122001,
Haryana
Gold and Gold Alloys
Jewellery/Artefacts -
Fineness and Marking
1417
-
-
2016
3.
L-
9590001119
04.07.2017
M/s Shubham Jewellers,
Gandhi Chowk, Sadar
Bazar,
Distt. Gurgaon - 122001,
Haryana
Gold and Gold Alloys
Jewellery/Artefacts -
Fineness and Marking
1417
-
-
2016
4.
L-
9590001220
04.07.2017
M/s Shubham Jewellers,
Gandhi Chowk, Sadar
Bazar,
Distt. Gurgaon - 122001,
Silver and Silver
Alloys
Jewellery/Artefacts -
Fineness and Marking
2112
-
-
2014
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
77
Haryana
5.
L-
9590001321
04.07.2017
M/s Shagun Jewellers,
Railway Road,
Distt. Rohtak - 124001,
Haryana
Gold and Gold Alloys
Jewellery/Artefacts -
Fineness and Marking
1417
-
-
2016
6.
L-
9512384822
10.07.2017
M/s Khatri Interlocking
Tiles,
VPO Kharak Jatan,
Near Mahan Miner, Bainsi,
Meham,
Kharak,
Distt. Bhiwani - 124514,
Haryana
Precast Concrete
Blocks for Paving
15658
-
-
2006
7.
L-
9512384923
10.07.2017
M/s Rana & Kaushik
Group,
Kila No. 20/2, Mustkil No.
47, Village Harchand Pur,
Sohna,
Distt. Gurgaon,
Haryana
Packaged Drinking
Water (Other Than
Packaged Natural
Mineral Water)
14543
-
-
2004
8.
L-
9512385622
10.07.2017
M/s J.K. Cement Works,
Jharli Mohanbari Road,
Jharli, Matanhail,
Jharli,
Distt. Jhajjar - 124106,
Haryana
Ordinary Portland
Cement
269
-
-
2015
9.
L-
9512385723
10.07.2017
M/s Shree Jee Precast,
V & P.O. Siddipura Lowa,
Bahadurgarh,
Distt. Jhajjar -- 124507,
Haryana
Precast Manhole
Cover and Frame
12592
-
-
2002
10.
L-
9512385024
11.07.2017
M/s Shree Shyam
Enterprises,
NH-2, Opp. Rajesthan
Motel,
Hodal,
Distt. Palwal - 121106,
Haryana
Precast Concrete
Blocks for Paving
15658
-
-
2006
11.
L-
9512385117
13.07.2017
M/s Shree Balaji
Interlocking Tiles,
V P O-Bhalot,
Bhalot,
Distt. Palwal,
Haryana
Precast Concrete
Blocks for Paving
15658
-
-
2006
12.
L-
9590001422
13.07.2017
M/s Satguru Jewellers,
Old Anaj Mandi, Meham,
Distt. Bhiwani - 124112,
Haryana
Gold and Gold Alloys
Jewellery/Artefacts -
Fineness and Marking
1417
-
-
2016
13.
L-
9512385218
14.07.2017
M/s Shree Om Enterprises,
Village Kanhawas, P.O.
Sangwari,
Distt. Rewari – 123401,
Haryana
Precast Concrete
Blocks for Paving
15658
-
-
2006
14.
L-
9512385319
14.07.2017
M/s Yadav Locking Tiles &
Building
Material Supplier,
Village Sadat Nagar, Tehsil
Precast Concrete
Blocks for Paving
15658
-
-
2006
78
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Kosli,
Kosli,
Distt. Rewari - 123302,
Haryana
15.
L-
9512385420
14.07.2017
M/s Jai Durge Concrete
Udyog,
Village Gharrot, Tehsil
Hathine,
Hathine,
Distt. Palwal - 121103,
Haryana
Precast Concrete
Blocks for Paving
15658
-
-
2006
16.
L-
9512385521
17.07.2017
M/s Haryana Electrical
Equipment,
Khasra No. 104/55, Kila
No. 9/3/1, Village Dhorka,
Wazipur,
Distt. Gurgaon - 123505,
Haryana
Outdoor Type Oil
Immersed Distribution
Transformers,
Part 1: Minerals Oil
Immersed
1180
01
-
2014
17.
L-
9512385925
17.07.2017
M/s T.M.S. Enterprises,
VPO-Luhari,
Distt. Jhajjar - 124108,
Haryana
Precast Concrete
Blocks for Paving
15658
-
-
2006
18.
L-
9512386624
17.07.2017
M/s BKD Beverages,
Village Dhankot, Jhajjar
Road,
Distt. Gurgaon - 122505,
Haryana
Packaged Drinking
Water (Other Than
Packaged Natural
Mineral Water)
14543
-
-
2004
19.
L-
9590001523
17.07.2017
M/s M.L. Jewellers,
Shop No.MCF-3712, 33 ft
Road,
Sanjay Colony, Sector-23,
Distt. Faridabad - 121005,
Haryana
Gold and Gold Alloys
Jewellery/Artefacts -
Fineness and Marking
1417
-
-
2016
20.
L-
9590001624
17.07.2017
M/s M.L. Jewellers,
Shop No.MCF-3712, 33 ft
Road,
Sanjay Colony, Sector-23,
Distt. Faridabad - 121005,
Haryana
Silver and Silver
Alloys
Jewellery/Artefacts -
Fineness and Marking
2112
-
-
2014
21.
L-
9512385824
24.07.2017
M/s Ultracon Infrachem (P)
Limited,
422/38, Rajiv Colony,
Opp. Hotel Melfort, N.H.8,
Distt. Gurgaon – 122001,
Haryana
Concrete Admixtures
9103
-
-
1999
22.
L-
9512386119
25.07.2017
M/s Unique Tiles Industries,
Village Garhi Bohar,
P.O. Asthal Bohar,
Distt. Rohtak, - 124521,
Haryana
Precast Concrete
Blocks for Paving
15658
-
-
2006
23.
L-
9512386321
25.07.2017
M/s Pooja Tiles,
Village Nasibpur,
Barkhoda,
Tehsil Narnaul,
Distt. Maherdragarh -
123001,
Haryana
Precast Concrete
Blocks for Paving
15658
-
-
2006
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
79
24.
L-9512386018
26.07.2017
M/s Indo Siam Safety
Products Private Limited,
Plot No. 149, 2nd Floor,
Sector-7, IMT Manesar,
Distt. Gurgaon - 122050,
Haryana
Protective Helmets for
Two Wheeler Riders
4151
-
-
1993
25.
L-9512386220
26.07.2017
M/s Shree Shyam Tile &
Material Supplier,
Khata No. 421/457,
Nandrampur Bas, Salarpur
Mod,
Dharuhera,
Distt. Rewari – 123106,
Haryana
Precast Concrete
Blocks for Paving
15658
-
-
2006
26.
L-9512386422
27.07.2017
M/s Jindal Sanitaryware
Pvt. Ltd.,
3 KM Mile Stone, VPO
Rohad,
Rohad,
Distt. Jhajjar - 124501,
Haryana
Injection Moulded
PVC Socket Fittings
with Solvent Cement
Joints for Water
Supplies
7834
01
-
1987
27.
L-9512386826
27.07.2017
M/s Jai Balaji Trading Co.,
Charkhi Dadri Loharu
Road,
Vill. Haroda Kalan,
Teh. Charkhi Dadri,
Charkhi Dadri,
Distt. Bhiwani – 127308,
Haryana
Precast Concrete
Blocks for Paving
15658
-
-
2006
28.
L-9590001717
27.07.2017
M/s Rajdeep Jewellers,
New Sarafa Bazar,
Bara Hazari Road,
Distt. Rewari - 123401,
Haryana
Gold and Gold Alloys
Jewellery/Artefacts -
Fineness and Marking
1417
-
-
2016
[No. CMD/13:11]
S. K. VERMA, Scientist E & Head
नई द ली, 22 दस बर, 2017
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 48
48
48
48.— भारतीय मानक r यूरो (माणन) िविनयम, 1988 के िविनयम (5) के उपिविनयम (6) के अनुसरण मH भारतीय
मानक r यूरो एत7ारा अिधसूिचत करता है क िन न िववरण वाले लाइसHस% को उनके आगे दशायी गई तारीख से रद्द / थिगत कर दया
गया है :-
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
$म
संs या
लाइसHस संs या
सीएम/एल
लाइसHसधारी का नाम व प-ा
लाइसHस के अ5 तगत व तु/$म
स बT भारतीय मानक का
शीषक
रद करने क ितिथ
01
एल-9951304
मै0 मंगला पोलीमस,
रसूलपुर, रेलवे $ोFसंग के नज़दीक,
िजला पलवल – 121102,
ह!रयाणा
क5 डयूटस फॉर इलै\ Wीकल
इ5 सटालेशनंस भाग 3- !रिजड
n लेन क5 डयूटस ऑफ द5 सूले टंग
मैटी!रयलस
आई एस 9537(भाग 3):1983
25.07.2017
[सं. सीएमडी/13:13]
एस. के. वमा, वैJािनक ई एवं मुख
80
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
New Delhi, the 22nd December, 2017
S.O.
S.O.
S.O.
S.O. 48
48
48
48.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (6) of the regulation 5 of the Bureau of Indian Standards
(Certification) Regulations 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies that the licences particulars of
which are given below have been cancelled/suspended with effect from the date indicated against each:
SCHEDULE
Sl.
No.
Licences No.
CM/L-
Name & Address
of the Licensee
Article/Process with relevant Indian
Standards covered by the licence
Cancelled/suspension
Date of Cancellation
01
L-9951304
M/s Mangla Polymers,
Rasulpur, Near Railway
Crossing,
Distt. Palwal - 121102,
Haryana
Conduits for Electrical Installation
Part 3: Rigid Plain Conduits of
Insulating Materials
IS 9537(Pt. 3):1983
25.07.2017
[No. CMD/13:13]
S. K. VERMA, Scientist E & Head
नई द ली, 22 दस बर, 2017
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 49
49
49
49.— भारतीय मानक r यूरो (माणन) िविनयम, 1988 के िविनयम (5) के उपिविनयम (6) के अनुसरण मH भारतीय
मानक r यूरो एत7ारा अिधसूिचत करता है क िन न िववरण वाले लाइसHस% को उनके आगे दशायी गई तारीख से रद्द / थिगत कर दया
गया है :-
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
$.
सं.
लाइसHस सं
सी एम/
एल-
लाइसHसधारी का नाम व पता
लाइसHस के अंतगत वतु/ $म स बT भारतीय
मानक का शीषक
र होने क
ितिथ
शू5य
[सं. सीएमडी/13:13]
एस. के. वमा, वैJािनक ई एवं मुख
New Delhi, the 22nd December, 2017
S.O.
S.O.
S.O.
S.O. 49
49
49
49.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (6) of the regulation 5 of the Bureau of Indian Standards
(Certification) Regulations 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies that the licences particulars of
which are given below have been cancelled/suspended with effect from the date indicated against each:
SCHEDULE
Sl.
No.
Licence No.
CM/L-
Name & Address of the Licensee
Article/ Process with relevant
Indian Standard covered by the
licence cancelled/suspension
Date of
Cancellation
NIL
[No. CMD/13:13]
S. K. VERMA, Scientist E & Head
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
81
पे)ोिलयम और *ाकृितक गैस मंालय
पे)ोिलयम और *ाकृितक गैस मंालय
पे)ोिलयम और *ाकृितक गैस मंालय
पे)ोिलयम और *ाकृितक गैस मंालय
नई द ली, 4 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 50
50
50
50.— के56ीय सरकार ने पेWोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूिम मH उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन) अिधिनयम,
1962 (1962 का 50) (िजसे इसमH इसके पात उ0 अिधिनयम कहा गया है) क धारा 3 उप धारा (1) के अधीन जारी क गई, भारत
सरकार के पेWोिलयम और ाकृितक गैस मंKालय क अिधसूचना िजसका काशन भारत के राजपK संsया 35 दनांक 02.09.2017
का.आ संsया 2016 दनांक 23.08.2017, भाग II, खGड 3, उप-खGड (II) मH कया गया है। इस अिधसूचना से संल अनुसूची मH
िविनzदp पंजाब राhय क तहसील नवांशहर, िजला शहीद भगत Fसंह नगर तथा तहसील गढ़शंकर, िजला होिशयारपुर क भूिम मH,
पंजाब राhय के गाँव
: झुिगयां : िजला शहीद भगत Fसंह नगर से िहमाचल देश के गाँव : पेखुबेला, िजला उना तक पैWोिलयम उVपाद% के
प!रवहन के िलए इंिडयन ऑइल कापOरेशन िलिमटेड ,ारा पीएजेपीएल - उना ांच पाइपलाइन प!रयोजना के स बंध मH पाइपलाइन
िबछाने के योजन के िलए उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन करने के िलए अपने आशय क घोषणा क थी।
और उ0 राजपK अिधसूचना क ितयाँ जनता को तारीख 23.11.2017 तक उपलrध करा दी गई थी।
और उ0 अिधिनयम क धारा 6 क उपधारा (1) के अनुसरण मH सम ािधकारी ने के56ीय सरकार को अपनी !रपोट दे दी है।
और के56ीय सरकार ने उ0 !रपोट पर िवचार करने के पात और यह समाधान हो जाने पर क उ0 भूिम पाइपलाइन
िबछाने के िलए अपेित है, उसमH उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन करने का िविनय कया है।
अत: अब, के56ीय सरकार उ0 अिधिनयम क धारा 6 क उपधारा (1) ,ारा द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए यह घोषणा
करती है क इस अिधसूचना से संल अनुसूची मH िविनzदp भूिम मH पाइपलाइन िबछाने के उपयोग का अिधकार अNजत कया जाए।
और के56ीय सरकार उ0 अिधिनयम क धारा 6 क उपधारा (4) ,ारा द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए, यह िनदश देती है
क उ0 भूिम मH उपयोग का अिधकार इस घोषणा के काशन क तारीख से के56ीय सरकार मH िनिहत होने के बजाय सभी िवलंगम% से
मु0 होकर इंिडयन ऑयल कापOरेशन िलिमटेड मH िनिहत होगा।
पेWोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन अिधिनयम 1962 क धारा 10 के अधीन कसी भी ितपूNत के िलए इंिडयन ऑयल
कापOरेशन िलिमटेड पूणतया उ-रदायी होगी और पाइपलाईन से स बि5धत कसी भी मामलH पर के56ीय सरकार के िवT कोई वाद
दावा या कानूनी कायवाही नहk हो सकेगी।
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
राhय : पंजाब
$ं.
सं.
िजला
तहसील
गाँव का नाम
हदबत
नं
मुरrबा // कला
तथा खसरा सं.
ेKफल
हे\टेयर
एयर
वग मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
एस. बी. एस. नगर
नवांशहर
झुिगयां
285
12 // 1
00
03
18
6 // 25/2
00
00
20
5 // 21
00
08
79
5 // 22
00
13
17
5 // 23
00
04
55
5 // 19/2
00
00
20
5 // 18/2
00
08
30
5 // 17/1
00
01
76
82
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
5 // 17/2
00
11
23
5 // 16
00
08
79
5 // 15
00
03
55
4 // 20
00
00
28
4 // 11
00
12
93
4 // 12
00
12
08
4 // 13
00
03
01
4 // 9/1
00
00
26
4 // 8
00
09
82
4 // 7
00
06
65
38 राता
00
02
46
2
एस. बी. एस. नगर
नवांशहर
जुलाह माजरा
286
54 // 8
00
00
20
79/1 राता
00
00
32
54 // 7
00
07
76
54 // 4
00
00
81
54 // 6
00
01
69
54 // 5/2
00
12
50
53 //1
00
00
83
3
एस. बी. एस. नगर
नवांशहर
खोजा
284
22 // 6
00
00
20
21 // 1
00
11
55
21 // 2
00
01
60
9 // 21
00
01
13
9 // 22
00
11
27
9 // 23
00
12
69
9 // 24
00
07
50
9 // 17
00
05
80
9 // 16
00
13
26
10 // 20
00
11
79
10 // 11
00
00
61
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
83
10 // 12
00
10
33
10 // 19
00
02
30
10 // 13
00
13
01
10 // 14
00
07
84
10 // 15
00
00
20
10 // 7
00
05
05
10 // 6
00
12
59
11 // 10
00
12
44
11 // 9
00
03
23
11 // 1
00
00
26
11 // 2
00
09
88
11 // 3
00
12
46
11 // 4
00
09
31
11 // 5
00
00
20
7 // 24
00
03
91
7 // 25
00
13
31
6 // 21
00
11
13
6 // 22
00
00
79
6 // 20
00
01
70
6 // 19
00
11
60
6 // 18
00
12
86
6 // 17
00
06
48
6 // 14
00
06
35
6 // 15
00
12
99
5 // 11/1
00
08
72
5 // 11/2
00
00
64
5 // 11/3
00
02
53
98 राता
00
00
82
5 // 28
00
01
64
84
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
5 // 12/1
00
02
08
5 // 12/2
00
00
98
5 // 9/2
00
08
58
62
00
01
55
5 // 8
00
09
64
5 // 7
00
12
28
5 // 6
00
11
14
4 // 10/2/1
00
05
80
4 // 10/2/2
00
03
89
4 // 10/1
00
02
71
4 // 9
00
06
63
4
एस. बी. एस. नगर
नवांशहर
ताजपुर
283
27 // 2
00
00
20
27 // 9
00
02
43
27 // 3
00
02
73
27 // 4
00
07
68
27 // 5
00
11
55
27 // 8
00
09
51
27 // 7
00
04
82
27 // 6
00
00
78
26 // 1
00
12
76
26 // 2/1
00
06
07
46 राता
00
00
20
45 राता
00
02
47
26 // 2/3
00
03
96
26 // 3
00
07
55
5
एस. बी. एस. नगर
नवांशहर
लालेवाल
282
6 // 3
00
04
53
6 // 4
00
12
31
6 // 5
00
07
27
1 // 25
00
06
01
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
85
2 // 21
00
08
86
6
एस. बी. एस. नगर
नवांशहर
गडी भारटी
218
55 // 6
00
09
62
85 राता
00
01
21
56 // 10
00
13
76
7
एस. बी. एस. नगर
नवांशहर
भारटा कलां
219
53 // 9
00
09
98
53 // 8
00
12
19
53 // 7
00
12
09
53 // 4
00
00
20
53 // 5
00
02
02
53 // 6
00
10
30
52 // 1
00
06
84
52 // 10
00
05
29
52 // 2
00
11
40
52 // 9
00
00
53
52 // 3
00
12
14
52 // 4/2
00
12
23
52 // 5/1
00
05
73
52 // 5/2
00
03
41
52 // 5/3
00
03
16
51 // 1/1
00
01
41
51 // 1/2
00
09
00
51 // 2/1
00
09
81
51 // 2/2
00
02
32
51 // 3/1
00
11
95
51 // 4
00
08
00
51 // 5
00
01
12
46 // 23
00
00
39
46 // 24
00
06
06
46 // 25
00
11
51
86
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
47 // 21
00
11
40
राता
00
01
06
47 // 22
00
12
37
47 // 23
00
11
73
47 // 18
00
00
20
47 // 17
00
03
90
47 // 24
00
08
52
47 // 25
00
02
12
47 // 16
00
10
27
48 // 20
00
11
91
48 // 19/2
00
11
82
48 // 18
00
11
39
8
एस. बी. एस. नगर
नवांशहर
दरीयापुर
278
15 // 18
00
00
68
15 // 17
00
11
27
15 // 14
00
01
17
15 // 15
00
07
20
15 // 16
00
05
60
14 // 20/2
00
00
51
14 // 11/1
00
03
50
33 राता
00
01
48
14 // 11/2
00
06
93
14 // 20/1/1
00
00
20
14 // 12
00
12
59
14 // 26
00
00
95
14 // 13/1
00
01
10
14 // 13/2
00
10
71
14 // 14
00
12
14
14 // 15
00
12
05
13 // 11/1
00
03
85
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
87
13 // 10/2
00
00
20
43 राता
00
07
12
13 // 10/1
00
00
20
13 // 11/2
00
05
86
13 // 12
00
05
59
13 // 13/1
00
00
68
13 // 9/1
00
03
78
13 // 8/1
00
09
50
13 // 7/1
00
12
47
13 // 6/1
00
12
46
12 // 26
00
03
35
12 // 10/1
00
08
90
12 // 9/1
00
12
88
12 // 8/1
00
10
63
12 // 3
00
01
60
12 // 4
00
07
66
12 // 5
00
04
26
12 // 6
00
00
22
12 // 7/1
00
04
99
9
एस. बी. एस. नगर
नवांशहर
काहल%
222
69 // 5
00
07
45
69 // 6
00
00
27
70 // 1/1
00
07
60
70 // 1/2
00
04
42
70 // 2
00
11
94
70 // 3
00
10
70
132 राता
00
01
37
70 // 4
00
11
85
70 // 5
00
11
90
67 // 25
00
00
21
88
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
71 // 1
00
07
87
71 // 2
00
01
98
66 // 21
00
03
99
66 // 22
00
10
54
66 // 23/1
00
06
38
66 // 23/2
00
06
09
66 // 24
00
11
83
66 // 25
00
11
73
65 // 20
00
00
20
65 // 21
00
10
10
65 // 19
00
02
90
65 // 22
00
08
67
65 // 18
00
08
78
65 // 23
00
03
01
65 //24
00
00
20
65 // 17
00
12
14
65 // 16
00
11
50
124 राता
00
01
51
64 // 20
00
10
74
64 // 19
00
12
13
64 // 18
00
11
75
64 // 13
00
00
20
64 // 14
00
03
28
64 // 17
00
08
77
64 // 15
00
02
07
64 // 16
00
01
27
10
एस. बी. एस. नगर
नवांशहर
गडी फ़तेह खां
273
5 // 15
00
06
19
5 // 6
00
01
79
4 // 11/1
00
00
87
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
89
4 // 10/2
00
12
26
4 // 9
00
12
76
4 // 2/3
00
00
20
4 // 8/2
00
04
16
4 // 8/3
00
00
20
4 // 3/1
00
06
76
4 // 3/2
00
01
13
4 // 4
00
08
19
11
एस. बी. एस. नगर
नवांशहर
पलीयां खुद
225
37 // 24
00
03
41
37 // 17
00
00
69
37 // 16
00
00
82
12
एस. बी. एस. नगर
नवांशहर
पलीयाँ कलां
226
39 // 16/2
00
09
33
39 // 16/1
00
00
91
39 // 15
00
00
81
38 // 20
00
00
81
38 // 11
00
14
28
38 // 10/2
00
00
55
53/3 राता
00
01
81
38 // 12
00
00
22
38 // 9
00
13
21
38 // 2
00
00
50
38 // 8
00
01
23
38 // 3
00
14
62
38 // 4
00
01
10
35 // 23
00
00
62
35 // 24
00
14
60
35 // 25
00
00
65
35 // 17
00
00
99
35 // 16
00
13
27
90
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
35 // 15/3
00
01
88
36 // 20
00
00
20
36 // 11/2
00
11
06
36 // 10/1/2
00
00
72
36 // 9/2
00
00
97
36 // 9/1
00
06
81
36 // 26
00
00
37
13
एस. बी. एस. नगर
नवांशहर
रामरायपुर
155
613
00
05
31
674
00
06
10
673
00
08
77
676
00
05
75
677
00
04
20
678
00
04
19
679
00
00
20
683
00
05
27
682
00
03
46
681
00
01
00
695
00
04
75
692
00
04
26
694
00
02
45
693
00
06
64
राता
00
01
14
774
00
03
59
773
00
10
56
772
00
09
05
राता
00
00
68
756
00
09
31
758
00
00
20
755
00
06
42
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
91
759
00
03
18
754
00
02
22
753
00
07
10
740
00
00
20
743
00
09
48
742
00
08
40
राता
00
00
98
425
00
09
80
421
00
09
61
422
00
00
20
403
00
09
45
367
00
08
03
366
00
02
50
365
00
00
20
14
एस. बी. एस. नगर
नवांशहर
सजावलपुर
154
591
00
00
97
579
00
07
58
578
00
08
85
573
00
03
51
574
00
04
92
572
00
13
03
558
00
07
56
557
00
03
63
778/556
00
02
93
777/556
00
00
86
535/1
00
01
94
535
00
09
80
534
00
08
64
533
00
03
91
530
00
01
00
92
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
529
00
00
20
525
00
00
20
526
00
00
20
524
00
00
20
15
एस. बी. एस. नगर
नवांशहर
सिहबाजपुर
227
2498 राता
00
01
58
2463
00
06
47
2464
00
13
10
2465
00
02
84
2467
00
00
20
2466
00
10
31
2473 राता
00
01
76
2475
00
11
67
2474
00
04
71
2670/2479
00
01
44
2669/2479
00
01
44
2482
00
06
94
2480
00
06
89
2488
00
00
20
2487
00
04
53
राता
00
00
24
2486
00
00
20
2333
00
00
85
2324
00
11
79
2325
00
06
03
2323 राता
00
01
08
2319
00
06
40
2320
00
12
25
2314
00
01
50
2321
00
00
36
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
93
2313
00
13
91
2312
00
08
99
2309 राता
00
04
83
2298
00
01
24
2297
00
07
97
2296
00
06
30
2295
00
08
16
2294
00
08
35
2289
00
06
48
2290
00
07
49
1856/508
00
01
32
2245
00
09
40
2165
00
11
82
2164
00
10
45
2163
00
13
86
2162
00
05
67
2140
00
09
01
2145
00
00
25
2144
00
08
07
2143
00
04
70
2142
00
00
33
2098
00
00
79
2105 राता
00
01
31
2125
00
10
28
2120
00
00
20
2124
00
02
25
2121
00
12
52
2118
00
02
14
2122
00
00
20
94
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2117
00
14
84
16
होिशयारपुर
गढ़शंकर
धमाई
163
2375/1978
00
13
66
2374/1978
00
01
79
1977
00
04
43
1976
00
00
61
1973
00
00
20
1975
00
03
87
1935
00
27
76
1936
00
01
54
1937/2368
00
04
42
1938
00
04
25
1947
00
01
59
2368/1943
00
07
34
1939
00
00
20
1940
00
03
75
17
होिशयारपुर
गढ़शंकर
रामगड
162
371
00
06
85
370
00
00
41
689/373
00
00
80
690/373
00
04
23
682/368
00
01
40
683/368
00
06
50
375
00
06
11
376
00
01
11
366
00
06
79
365
00
07
49
364
00
00
75
363
00
05
67
379
00
06
80
राता
00
01
17
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
95
401
00
04
37
400
00
11
44
399
00
02
19
389
00
11
91
388
00
00
20
राता
00
01
55
391
00
00
20
510
00
00
57
508
00
00
69
509
00
12
23
571/515
00
03
77
516
00
08
07
575/517
00
01
88
522
00
02
05
518
00
10
74
519
00
01
24
520
00
02
88
506
00
00
48
18
होिशयारपुर
गढ़शंकर
मौजूपुर
250
237
00
08
46
236
00
10
69
235
00
11
58
150
00
03
15
487/151
00
08
70
488/151
00
01
09
489/152
00
00
41
490/152
00
05
41
153
00
02
00
441/439
00
00
20
442/439
00
00
20
96
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
19
होिशयारपुर
गढ़शंकर
कुनैल
364
426
00
09
04
380
00
13
09
425
00
02
52
423
00
09
20
417
00
00
20
418
00
03
87
419
00
03
24
422/2
00
06
78
420
00
01
71
422/1
00
16
11
399
00
03
13
398
00
02
44
397
00
00
78
396
00
05
33
395
00
01
59
400
00
03
58
401/2
00
05
64
394
00
00
25
393/2
00
00
20
401/1
00
06
07
339/2
00
05
56
339/1
00
16
49
335
00
00
28
336
00
07
76
20
होिशयारपुर
गढ़शंकर
बारापुर
361
86 राता
00
01
42
36 // 11
00
03
78
37 // 15/2
00
03
43
37 // 15/1
00
01
32
37 // 6
00
12
93
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
97
37 // 7/1
00
00
20
37 // 5/2
00
00
22
37 // 5/1
00
01
99
37 // 4
00
10
77
30 // 24/2
00
05
72
30 // 23/3
00
00
20
318 राता
00
01
71
30 // 24/1
00
01
83
30 // 23/2
00
04
11
30 // 18/2
00
03
52
30 // 18/1
00
06
81
315 राता
00
01
80
30 // 13/2
00
00
20
30 // 13/1
00
03
07
30 // 12/3
00
06
78
30 // 12/2
00
04
56
30 // 9/2
00
00
20
30 // 9/3
00
03
83
30 // 9/5
00
00
28
30 // 9/1
00
02
89
राता
00
02
22
30 // 9/4
00
01
87
30 // 2/3
00
00
58
राता
00
00
20
30 // 2/2
00
00
20
30 // 2/1
00
09
90
30 // 1
00
00
21
19 // 22/3
00
02
73
19 // 21/2
00
02
39
98
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
19 // 22/1
00
00
38
19 // 21/1
00
06
18
19 // 20
00
11
90
19 // 11
00
10
95
19 // 10
00
02
23
राता
00
00
20
20 // 15
00
00
20
342 राता
00
02
74
20 // 6
00
07
24
20 // 5/2
00
06
01
20 // 5/1
00
05
55
12 // 25/2
00
06
10
12 // 25/1
00
05
65
12 // 28
00
00
65
12 // 24
00
00
20
12 // 16/2
00
00
26
12 // 16/3
00
02
95
12 // 17
00
07
38
12 // 14/2
00
10
22
89 राता
00
01
77
12 // 7
00
11
44
283 राता
00
00
20
12 // 4/3
00
02
19
12 // 4/2
00
10
89
12 // 5
00
00
20
6 // 24
00
02
95
6 // 25/1
00
09
24
6 // 16/2
00
01
97
6 // 16/1
00
10
16
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
99
6 // 15
00
06
24
5 // 11
00
04
44
6 // 6
00
00
20
5 // 10
00
06
80
21
होिशयारपुर
गढ़शंकर
गदीवाल
483
5 // 4
00
04
52
1 // 24/4
00
03
38
1 // 24/3
00
06
39
1 // 25/1
00
01
44
1 // 17/1
00
00
93
1 // 16/2
00
05
61
110 राता
00
00
90
1 // 16/1/2
00
01
89
1 // 16/1/1
00
02
27
1 // 15/3
00
02
73
1 // 15/2
00
09
05
2 // 11
00
00
24
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/1/2018-ओआर-I/ई-21789]
पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव
MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS
New Delhi, the 4th January, 2018
S.O. 50.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural
Gas, published in the Gazette No. 35 dated 02.09.2017, S.O. No. 2016 dated 23.08.2017 Part-II, section 3, sub-section
(ii) issued under sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in
Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) the Central Government declared its intention to
acquire the right of user in the land situated in Tehsil – Nawanshahr of District Shahid Bhagat Singh Nagar and Tehsil
– Garhshankar of District Hoshiarpur in Punjab State, specified in the schedule appended to that notification for the
purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of petroleum product from village Jhungian in the State of Punjab,
District Shahid Bhagat Singh Nagar to village Pekhubela in the State of Himachal Pradesh, District Una by the Indian
Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the "PAJPL - Una Branch pipeline project".
And whereas the copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on 23.11.2017
And whereas the Competent Authority has under sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, has submitted his
report of Central Government.
And whereas, the Central Government after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land
is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of the user therein;
100
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central
Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is
hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central
Government hereby directs that the right of user of the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the
Central Government, vests on the date of publication of the declaration, in India Oil Corporation Limited, free from all
encumbrances.
India Oil Corporation Limited shall be exclusively liable for any compensation in terms of section 10 of the
P & MP Act, 1962 and no suit, claim or legal proceeding would lie against the Central Government on any matter
relating to pipeline.
SCHEDULE
State : Punjab
Sr.
No.
Name of
District
Name of
Tehsil
Name of Village
Hadbast
No.
Murabba //
Killa OR
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq. mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
S.B.S. Nagar
Nawanshahr
Jhungian
285
12 // 1
00
03
18
6 // 25/2
00
00
20
5 // 21
00
08
79
5 // 22
00
13
17
5 // 23
00
04
55
5 // 19/2
00
00
20
5 // 18/2
00
08
30
5 // 17/1
00
01
76
5 // 17/2
00
11
23
5 // 16
00
08
79
5 // 15
00
03
55
4 // 20
00
00
28
4 // 11
00
12
93
4 // 12
00
12
08
4 // 13
00
03
01
4 // 9/1
00
00
26
4 // 8
00
09
82
4 // 7
00
06
65
38 Rasta
00
02
46
2
S.B.S. Nagar
Nawanshahr
Julah Majra
286
54 // 8
00
00
20
79/1 Rasta
00
00
32
54 // 7
00
07
76
54 // 4
00
00
81
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
101
54 // 6
00
01
69
54 // 5/2
00
12
50
53 //1
00
00
83
3
S.B.S. Nagar
Nawanshahr
Khoja
284
22 // 6
00
00
20
21 // 1
00
11
55
21 // 2
00
01
60
9 // 21
00
01
13
9 // 22
00
11
27
9 // 23
00
12
69
9 // 24
00
07
50
9 // 17
00
05
80
9 // 16
00
13
26
10 // 20
00
11
79
10 // 11
00
00
61
10 // 12
00
10
33
10 // 19
00
02
30
10 // 13
00
13
01
10 // 14
00
07
84
10 // 15
00
00
20
10 // 7
00
05
05
10 // 6
00
12
59
11 // 10
00
12
44
11 // 9
00
03
23
11 // 1
00
00
26
11 // 2
00
09
88
11 // 3
00
12
46
11 // 4
00
09
31
11 // 5
00
00
20
7 // 24
00
03
91
7 // 25
00
13
31
6 // 21
00
11
13
6 // 22
00
00
79
6 // 20
00
01
70
6 // 19
00
11
60
6 // 18
00
12
86
102
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
6 // 17
00
06
48
6 // 14
00
06
35
6 // 15
00
12
99
5 // 11/1
00
08
72
5 // 11/2
00
00
64
5 // 11/3
00
02
53
98 Rasta
00
00
82
5 // 28
00
01
64
5 // 12/1
00
02
08
5 // 12/2
00
00
98
5 // 9/2
00
08
58
62
00
01
55
5 // 8
00
09
64
5 // 7
00
12
28
5 // 6
00
11
14
4 // 10/2/1
00
05
80
4 // 10/2/2
00
03
89
4 // 10/1
00
02
71
4 // 9
00
06
63
4
S.B.S. Nagar
Nawanshahr
Tajpur
283
27 // 2
00
00
20
27 // 9
00
02
43
27 // 3
00
02
73
27 // 4
00
07
68
27 // 5
00
11
55
27 // 8
00
09
51
27 // 7
00
04
82
27 // 6
00
00
78
26 // 1
00
12
76
26 // 2/1
00
06
07
46 Rasta
00
00
20
45 Rasta
00
02
47
26 // 2/3
00
03
96
26 // 3
00
07
55
5
S.B.S. Nagar
Nawanshahr
Lalewal
282
6 // 3
00
04
53
6 // 4
00
12
31
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
103
6 // 5
00
07
27
1 // 25
00
06
01
2 // 21
00
08
86
6
S.B.S. Nagar
Nawanshahr
Garhi Bharti
218
55 // 6
00
09
62
85 Rasta
00
01
21
56 // 10
00
13
76
7
S.B.S. Nagar
Nawanshahr
Bharta Kalan
219
53 // 9
00
09
98
53 // 8
00
12
19
53 // 7
00
12
09
53 // 4
00
00
20
53 // 5
00
02
02
53 // 6
00
10
30
52 // 1
00
06
84
52 // 10
00
05
29
52 // 2
00
11
40
52 // 9
00
00
53
52 // 3
00
12
14
52 // 4/2
00
12
23
52 // 5/1
00
05
73
52 // 5/2
00
03
41
52 // 5/3
00
03
16
51 // 1/1
00
01
41
51 // 1/2
00
09
00
51 // 2/1
00
09
81
51 // 2/2
00
02
32
51 // 3/1
00
11
95
51 // 4
00
08
00
51 // 5
00
01
12
46 // 23
00
00
39
46 // 24
00
06
06
46 // 25
00
11
51
47 // 21
00
11
40
Rasta
00
01
06
47 // 22
00
12
37
47 // 23
00
11
73
104
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
47 // 18
00
00
20
47 // 17
00
03
90
47 // 24
00
08
52
47 // 25
00
02
12
47 // 16
00
10
27
48 // 20
00
11
91
48 // 19/2
00
11
82
48 // 18
00
11
39
8
S.B.S. Nagar
Nawanshahr
Dariyapur
278
15 // 18
00
00
68
15 // 17
00
11
27
15 // 14
00
01
17
15 // 15
00
07
20
15 // 16
00
05
60
14 // 20/2
00
00
51
14 // 11/1
00
03
50
33 Rasta
00
01
48
14 // 11/2
00
06
93
14 // 20/1/1
00
00
20
14 // 12
00
12
59
14 // 26
00
00
95
14 // 13/1
00
01
10
14 // 13/2
00
10
71
14 // 14
00
12
14
14 // 15
00
12
05
13 // 11/1
00
03
85
13 // 10/2
00
00
20
43 Rasta
00
07
12
13 // 10/1
00
00
20
13 // 11/2
00
05
86
13 // 12
00
05
59
13 // 13/1
00
00
68
13 // 9/1
00
03
78
13 // 8/1
00
09
50
13 // 7/1
00
12
47
13 // 6/1
00
12
46
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
105
12 // 26
00
03
35
12 // 10/1
00
08
90
12 // 9/1
00
12
88
12 // 8/1
00
10
63
12 // 3
00
01
60
12 // 4
00
07
66
12 // 5
00
04
26
12 // 6
00
00
22
12 // 7/1
00
04
99
9
S.B.S. Nagar
Nawanshahr
Kahlon
222
69 // 5
00
07
45
69 // 6
00
00
27
70 // 1/1
00
07
60
70 // 1/2
00
04
42
70 // 2
00
11
94
70 // 3
00
10
70
132 Rasta
00
01
37
70 // 4
00
11
85
70 // 5
00
11
90
67 // 25
00
00
21
71 // 1
00
07
87
71 // 2
00
01
98
66 // 21
00
03
99
66 // 22
00
10
54
66 // 23/1
00
06
38
66 // 23/2
00
06
09
66 // 24
00
11
83
66 // 25
00
11
73
65 // 20
00
00
20
65 // 21
00
10
10
65 // 19
00
02
90
65 // 22
00
08
67
65 // 18
00
08
78
65 // 23
00
03
01
65 //24
00
00
20
65 // 17
00
12
14
106
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
65 // 16
00
11
50
124 Rasta
00
01
51
64 // 20
00
10
74
64 // 19
00
12
13
64 // 18
00
11
75
64 // 13
00
00
20
64 // 14
00
03
28
64 // 17
00
08
77
64 // 15
00
02
07
64 // 16
00
01
27
10
S.B.S. Nagar
Nawanshahr
Garhi Fateh Khan.
273
5 // 15
00
06
19
5 // 6
00
01
79
4 // 11/1
00
00
87
4 //10/2
00
12
26
4 // 9
00
12
76
4 // 2/3
00
00
20
4 // 8/2
00
04
16
4 // 8/3
00
00
20
4 // 3/1
00
06
76
4 // 3/2
00
01
13
4 // 4
00
08
19
11
S.B.S. Nagar
Nawanshahr
Pallian khurd
225
37 // 24
00
03
41
37 // 17
00
00
69
37 // 16
00
00
82
12
S.B.S. Nagar
Nawanshahr
Pallian Kalan
226
39 // 16/2
00
09
33
39 // 16/1
00
00
91
39 // 15
00
00
81
38 // 20
00
00
81
38 // 11
00
14
28
38 // 10/2
00
00
55
53/3 Rasta
00
01
81
38 // 12
00
00
22
38 // 9
00
13
21
38 // 2
00
00
50
38 // 8
00
01
23
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
107
38 // 3
00
14
62
38 // 4
00
01
10
35 // 23
00
00
62
35 // 24
00
14
60
35 // 25
00
00
65
35 // 17
00
00
99
35 // 16
00
13
27
35 // 15/3
00
01
88
36 // 20
00
00
20
36 // 11/2
00
11
06
36 // 10/1/2
00
00
72
36 // 9/2
00
00
97
36 // 9/1
00
06
81
36 // 26
00
00
37
13
S.B.S. Nagar
Nawanshahr
Ramraipur
155
613
00
05
31
674
00
06
10
673
00
08
77
676
00
05
75
677
00
04
20
678
00
04
19
679
00
00
20
683
00
05
27
682
00
03
46
681
00
01
00
695
00
04
75
692
00
04
26
694
00
02
45
693
00
06
64
Rasta
00
01
14
774
00
03
59
773
00
10
56
772
00
09
05
Rasta
00
00
68
756
00
09
31
758
00
00
20
108
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
755
00
06
42
759
00
03
18
754
00
02
22
753
00
07
10
740
00
00
20
743
00
09
48
742
00
08
40
Rasta
00
00
98
425
00
09
80
421
00
09
61
422
00
00
20
403
00
09
45
367
00
08
03
366
00
02
50
365
00
00
20
14
S.B.S. Nagar
Nawanshahr
Sajawalpur
154
591
00
00
97
579
00
07
58
578
00
08
85
573
00
03
51
574
00
04
92
572
00
13
03
558
00
07
56
557
00
03
63
778/556
00
02
93
777/556
00
00
86
535/1
00
01
94
535
00
09
80
534
00
08
64
533
00
03
91
530
00
01
00
529
00
00
20
525
00
00
20
526
00
00
20
524
00
00
20
15
S.B.S. Nagar
Nawanshahr
Sahbajpur
227
2498 Rasta
00
01
58
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
109
2463
00
06
47
2464
00
13
10
2465
00
02
84
2467
00
00
20
2466
00
10
31
2473 Rasta
00
01
76
2475
00
11
67
2474
00
04
71
2670/2479
00
01
44
2669/2479
00
01
44
2482
00
06
94
2480
00
06
89
2488
00
00
20
2487
00
04
53
Rasta
00
00
24
2486
00
00
20
2333
00
00
85
2324
00
11
79
2325
00
06
03
2323 Rasta
00
01
08
2319
00
06
40
2320
00
12
25
2314
00
01
50
2321
00
00
36
2313
00
13
91
2312
00
08
99
2309 Rasta
00
04
83
2298
00
01
24
2297
00
07
97
2296
00
06
30
2295
00
08
16
2294
00
08
35
2289
00
06
48
2290
00
07
49
1856/508
00
01
32
110
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2245
00
09
40
2165
00
11
82
2164
00
10
45
2163
00
13
86
2162
00
05
67
2140
00
09
01
2145
00
00
25
2144
00
08
07
2143
00
04
70
2142
00
00
33
2098
00
00
79
2105 Rasta
00
01
31
2125
00
10
28
2120
00
00
20
2124
00
02
25
2121
00
12
52
2118
00
02
14
2122
00
00
20
2117
00
14
84
16
Hoshiarpur
Garhshankar
Dhamai
163
2375/1978
00
13
66
2374/1978
00
01
79
1977
00
04
43
1976
00
00
61
1973
00
00
20
1975
00
03
87
1935
00
27
76
1936
00
01
54
1937/2368
00
04
42
1938
00
04
25
1947
00
01
59
2368/1943
00
07
34
1939
00
00
20
1940
00
03
75
17
Hoshiarpur
Garhshankar
Ramgarh
162
371
00
06
85
370
00
00
41
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
111
689/373
00
00
80
690/373
00
04
23
682/368
00
01
40
683/368
00
06
50
375
00
06
11
376
00
01
11
366
00
06
79
365
00
07
49
364
00
00
75
363
00
05
67
379
00
06
80
Rasta
00
01
17
401
00
04
37
400
00
11
44
399
00
02
19
389
00
11
91
388
00
00
20
Rasta
00
01
55
391
00
00
20
510
00
00
57
508
00
00
69
509
00
12
23
571/515
00
03
77
516
00
08
07
575/517
00
01
88
522
00
02
05
518
00
10
74
519
00
01
24
520
00
02
88
506
00
00
48
18
Hoshiarpur
Garhshankar
Maujupur
250
237
00
08
46
236
00
10
69
235
00
11
58
150
00
03
15
487/151
00
08
70
112
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
488/151
00
01
09
489/152
00
00
41
490/152
00
05
41
153
00
02
00
441/439
00
00
20
442/439
00
00
20
19
Hoshiarpur
Garhshankar
Kunail
364
426
00
09
04
380
00
13
09
425
00
02
52
423
00
09
20
417
00
00
20
418
00
03
87
419
00
03
24
422/2
00
06
78
420
00
01
71
422/1
00
16
11
399
00
03
13
398
00
02
44
397
00
00
78
396
00
05
33
395
00
01
59
400
00
03
58
401/2
00
05
64
394
00
00
25
393/2
00
00
20
401/1
00
06
07
339/2
00
05
56
339/1
00
16
49
335
00
00
28
336
00
07
76
20
Hoshiarpur
Garhshankar
Barapur
361
86 Rasta
00
01
42
36 // 11
00
03
78
37 // 15/2
00
03
43
37 // 15/1
00
01
32
37 // 6
00
12
93
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
113
37 // 7/1
00
00
20
37 // 5/2
00
00
22
37 // 5/1
00
01
99
37 // 4
00
10
77
30 // 24/2
00
05
72
30 // 23/3
00
00
20
318 Rasta
00
01
71
30 // 24/1
00
01
83
30 // 23/2
00
04
11
30 // 18/2
00
03
52
30 // 18/1
00
06
81
315 Rasta
00
01
80
30 // 13/2
00
00
20
30 // 13/1
00
03
07
30 // 12/3
00
06
78
30 // 12/2
00
04
56
30 // 9/2
00
00
20
30 // 9/3
00
03
83
30 // 9/5
00
00
28
30 // 9/1
00
02
89
Rasta
00
02
22
30 // 9/4
00
01
87
30 // 2/3
00
00
58
Rasta
00
00
20
30 // 2/2
00
00
20
30 // 2/1
00
09
90
30 // 1
00
00
21
19 // 22/3
00
02
73
19 // 21/2
00
02
39
19 // 22/1
00
00
38
19 // 21/1
00
06
18
19 // 20
00
11
90
19 // 11
00
10
95
19 // 10
00
02
23
Rasta
00
00
20
114
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
20 // 15
00
00
20
342 Rasta
00
02
74
20 // 6
00
07
24
20 // 5/2
00
06
01
20 // 5/1
00
05
55
12 // 25/2
00
06
10
12 // 25/1
00
05
65
12 // 28
00
00
65
12 // 24
00
00
20
12 // 16/2
00
00
26
12 // 16/3
00
02
95
12 // 17
00
07
38
12 // 14/2
00
10
22
89 Rasta
00
01
77
12 // 7
00
11
44
283 Rasta
00
00
20
12 // 4/3
00
02
19
12 // 4/2
00
10
89
12 // 5
00
00
20
6 // 24
00
02
95
6 // 25/1
00
09
24
6 // 16/2
00
01
97
6 // 16/1
00
10
16
6 // 15
00
06
24
5 // 11
00
04
44
6 // 6
00
00
20
5 // 10
00
06
80
21
Hoshiarpur
Garhshankar
Gaddiwal
483
5 // 4
00
04
52
1 // 24/4
00
03
38
1 // 24/3
00
06
39
1 // 25/1
00
01
44
1 // 17/1
00
00
93
1 // 16/2
00
05
61
110 Rasta
00
00
90
1 // 16/1/2
00
01
89
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
115
1 // 16/1/1
00
02
27
1 // 15/3
00
02
73
1 // 15/2
00
09
05
2 // 11
00
00
24
[F. No. R-11025(11)/1/2018-OR-I/E-21789]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
नई द ली, 11 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 51
51
51
51.— के56ीय सरकार को लोकिहत मH यह आवfयक तीत होता है क पारादीप (ओिड़शा) से हैदराबाद (तेलंगाना)
तक पेWोिलयम उVपाद% के प!रवहन के िलए इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपOरेशन िलिमटेड के ,ारा "पारादीप -हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन" िबछाई जानी
चािहए;
और के56ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन िबछाने के योजन के िलए यह आवfयक तीत होता है क ऐसी भूिम मH जो इससे
उपाबT अनुसूची मH वNणत है और िजसमH उ0 पाइपलाइन िबछाऐ जाने का ताव है, उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन कया जाए;
अत: अब, के56ीय सरकार, पेWोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइ5स (भूिम मH उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन) अिधिनयम,1962
(1962 का 50) क धारा 3 क उपधारा (1) ,ारा द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए, उस भूिम मH उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन करने
के अपने आशय क घोषणा करती है;
कोई ि0, जो उ0 अनुसूची मH वNणत भूिम मH िहतबT है, उस तारीख से िजसको इस अिधसूचना से यु0 भारत के राजपK
क ितयाँ साधारण जनता को उपलrध करा दी जाती ह , इ\ कस दन के भीतर भूिम के नीचे पाइपलाइन िबछाए जाने के िलए उस मH
उपयोग के अिधकार के अजन के स ब5ध मH 8ी दलीप कुमार महांित, सम ािधकारी, इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपOरेशन िलिमटेड, पारादीप -
हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन प!रयोजना, तृतीय तल, आलोक भारती टावर, शहीद नगर, भुवनेf वर -751007, ओिड़शा को िलिखत gप मH
आेप भेज सकेगा I
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
तहसील - एरसमा
िजला - जगतFसंहपुर
राhय - ओिड़शा
गाँव का नाम
nलॉट नं.
ेKफल
हे\टेयर
एयर
वग मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
पािणगिड़आक5धा
326
00
01
00
327
00
00
45
290
00
10
72
291
00
01
92
292/793
00
02
52
293
00
02
56
295
00
03
70
296
00
01
85
116
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/236/2017-ओआर-I/ई-13717]
पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव
297
00
01
50
298
00
02
88
299
00
02
34
257
00
02
52
278
00
00
16
276
00
02
52
274
00
02
95
273
00
00
55
272
00
04
00
269/777
00
03
28
260
00
01
45
266
00
00
74
239/978
00
04
68
239
00
03
39
238
00
01
48
238/945
00
04
52
239/977
00
02
00
234
00
13
30
235/747
00
01
20
235
00
03
90
210
00
29
00
267
00
00
28
233/779
00
00
22
238/946
00
00
56
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
117
New Delhi, the 11th January, 2018
S.O. 51.— Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the
transportation of petroleum products from Paradip (Odisha) to Hyderabad (Telangana),“Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline”
should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;
And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary
to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the
schedule annexed hereto;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and
Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby
declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty-one days from the date on
which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the general public, object in
writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Sri Dillip Kumar
Mohanty, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline Project, 3rd Floor, Alok
Bharati Tower, Saheed Nagar, Bhubaneswar- 751007, (Odisha).
SCHEDULE
Tehsil : ERASAMA
District : JAGATSINGHPUR
State : ODISHA
Name of the Village
Plot No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
PANIGARIAKANDHA
326
00
01
00
327
00
00
45
290
00
10
72
291
00
01
92
292/793
00
02
52
293
00
02
56
295
00
03
70
296
00
01
85
297
00
01
50
298
00
02
88
299
00
02
34
257
00
02
52
278
00
00
16
276
00
02
52
274
00
02
95
273
00
00
55
272
00
04
00
269/777
00
03
28
260
00
01
45
266
00
00
74
239/978
00
04
68
239
00
03
39
118
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
238
00
01
48
238/945
00
04
52
239/977
00
02
00
234
00
13
30
235/747
00
01
20
235
00
03
90
210
00
29
00
267
00
00
28
233/779
00
00
22
238/946
00
00
56
[F. No. R-11025(11)/236/2017-OR-I/E-13717]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
नई द ली, 11 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 52
52
52
52.—के56ीय सरकार ने पेWोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूिम मH उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन) अिधिनयम,
1962 (1962 का 50) (िजसे इसमH इसके पात उ0 अिधिनयम कहा गया है) क धारा 3 उप धारा (1) के अधीन जारी क गई, भारत
सरकार के पेWोिलयम और ाकृितक गैस मंKालय क अिधसूचना का.आ. 1068(अ) तारीख 03.04.2017 िजसका काशन भारत के
राजपK संsया 947, भाग II, खGड 3, उप खGड (II) तारीख 06.04.2017 मH कया गया है। इस अिधसूचना मH संल न अनुसूची मH
िविनzदp आंLदेश राhय के मंडल : ,ारका ितमला िजला: वेट गोदावरी क भूिम मH, ओडीशा राhय मH पारादीप से तेलंगाना राhय मH
हैदराबाद तक पेWोिलयम उVपाद% के प!रवहन के िलए इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपOरेशन िलिमटेड के ,ारा $याि5वत कए जा रहे “पारादीप-
हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन प!रयोजना” के संबंध मH पाइपलाइन िबछाने के योजन के िलए उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन करने के िलए अपने
आशय क घोषणा क थी:
और उ0 राजपK अिधसूचना क ितयाँ जनता को उपलrध करा दी ग थk। और उ0 अिधिनयम क धारा 6 क उपधारा (1)
के अनुसरण मH सम ािधकारी ने के56ीय सरकार को अपनी !रपोट दे दी है।
और के56ीय सरकार ने उ0 !रपोट पर िवचार करने के पf चात् और यह समाधान हो जाने पर क उ0 भूिम पाइपलाइन
िबछाने के िलए अपेित है, उसमH उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन करने का िविनf चय कया है:
अतः अब, के56ीय सरकार उ0 अिधिनयम क धारा 6 क उपधारा (1) ,ारा द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए एतद् ,ारा
घोषणा करती है क इस अिधसूचना से संल न अनुसूची मH िविनzदp भूिम मH पाइपलाइन िबछाने के उपयोग का अिधकार अNजत कया
जाए:
और के56ीय सरकार उ0 अिधिनयम क धारा 6 क उपधारा (4) ,ारा द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए, यह िनदश देती है
क उ0 भूिम मH उपयोग का अिधकार इस घोषणा के काशन क तारीख से के56ीय सरकार मH िनिहत होने के बजाए सभी िबलंगम% से
मु0 होकर इंिडयन ऑयल कापOरेशन िलिमटेड मH िनिहत होगा।
अनुसूची
िजला: वेट गोदावरी राhय: आ5L देश
मंडल का नाम
ाम का नाम
सव न बर
ेKफल
हे\टेयर
एयर
वग मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
,ारका ितमला
जगाधपुरम
4/3
00
00
03
4/2A
00
14
81
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
119
4/2B
00
07
71
4/2C
00
08
51
4/1
00
00
16
10/1
00
55
51
10/2
00
10
01
3/6
00
03
98
11/2
00
12
96
11/1
00
16
71
15/1
00
00
23
,ारका ितमला
जी. को-ापली
20/1
00
16
25
11
00
23
56
10/4
00
05
93
10/2J
00
05
47
10/2E
00
05
56
10/2D
00
05
17
10/1B/4
00
03
06
10/1B/3-2
00
09
60
8/1C
00
21
19
8/1E
00
03
64
1/6
00
10
59
1/3
00
10
15
1/5
00
08
64
1/4
00
10
05
2/2
00
00
42
2/1
00
00
05
3/1
00
18
97
,ारका ितमला
कोडीगुडेम
280/1
00
11
55
279
00
43
39
281
00
23
13
282/2
00
12
67
282/1
00
00
25
120
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
289/1
00
30
01
288/5
00
09
78
288/3
00
01
53
288/4
00
16
82
292/2
00
10
29
292/1
00
15
39
79/2
00
20
63
78/1
00
33
04
73
00
46
74
77
00
02
41
76
00
34
72
66
00
02
13
65
00
39
72
63
00
19
91
64
00
01
63
,ारका ितमला
चेिलकिनवारी पोतेपली
83/3
00
37
89
82
00
46
60
81/2
00
11
92
81/1
00
02
91
80/5
00
14
69
80/3
00
09
56
80/2
00
04
41
80/1
00
15
00
97/3
00
15
90
97/2
00
10
41
97/1
00
05
63
98/4
00
00
32
100/9
00
01
47
100/8
00
09
98
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
121
100/7
00
07
06
100/11
00
10
08
99/7
00
10
60
99/6
00
09
62
99/5
00
03
85
100/6
00
17
63
100/3
00
07
15
100/1
00
01
42
100/2
00
08
60
101/1C
00
16
13
45/4
00
36
21
45/2
00
22
42
44/5
00
02
73
44/4
00
10
88
44/6
00
05
53
44/2
00
05
40
44/1
00
06
30
37/2F
00
11
98
38/2
00
41
25
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/252/2017-ओआर-I/ई-21033]
पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 11th January, 2018
S.O. 52 .— Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural
Gas, published in the Gazette of India No. 947 Part-II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii) dated 06.04.2017 vide S.O. Number
1068 (E) dated 03.04.2017 issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals pipelines
(Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) the Central
Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land situated in Mandal Dwaraka Tirumala, District
West Godavari in Andhra Pradesh State, specified in the schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of
laying pipeline for the transportation of petroleum products from Paradip in the State of Odisha to Hyderabad in the
State of Telangana by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the "Paradip–Hyderabad Pipeline Project".
And whereas the copies of the Gazette were made available to the public. And whereas the Competent
Authority has under Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, has submitted his report of Central Government.
And whereas, the Central Government after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land
is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of the user therein;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central
Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is
hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
122
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central
Government hereby directs that the right of user of the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the
Central Government, vests on the date of publication of the declaration, in India Oil Corporation Limited, free from all
encumbrances.
SCHEDULE
District : West Godavari
State : Andhra Pradesh
Name of Mandal
Name of Village
Survey No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Square
Metre
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
Dwaraka Tirumala
Jagannadhapuram
4/3
00
00
03
4/2A
00
14
81
4/2B
00
07
71
4/2C
00
08
51
4/1
00
00
16
10/1
00
55
51
10/2
00
10
01
3/6
00
03
98
11/2
00
12
96
11/1
00
16
71
15/1
00
00
23
Dwaraka Tirumala
G Kottapalli
20/1
00
16
25
11
00
23
56
10/4
00
05
93
10/2J
00
05
47
10/2E
00
05
56
10/2D
00
05
17
10/1B/4
00
03
06
10/1B/3-2
00
09
60
8/1C
00
21
19
8/1E
00
03
64
1/6
00
10
59
1/3
00
10
15
1/5
00
08
64
1/4
00
10
05
2/2
00
00
42
2/1
00
00
05
3/1
00
18
97
Dwaraka Tirumala
Kodigudem
280/1
00
11
55
279
00
43
39
281
00
23
13
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
123
282/2
00
12
67
282/1
00
00
25
289/1
00
30
01
288/5
00
09
78
288/3
00
01
53
288/4
00
16
82
292/2
00
10
29
292/1
00
15
39
79/2
00
20
63
78/1
00
33
04
73
00
46
74
77
00
02
41
76
00
34
72
66
00
02
13
65
00
39
72
63
00
19
91
64
00
01
63
Dwaraka Tirumala
Chelikanivari Potepalli
83/3
00
37
89
82
00
46
60
81/2
00
11
92
81/1
00
02
91
80/5
00
14
69
80/3
00
09
56
80/2
00
04
41
80/1
00
15
00
97/3
00
15
90
97/2
00
10
41
97/1
00
05
63
98/4
00
00
32
100/9
00
01
47
100/8
00
09
98
100/7
00
07
06
100/11
00
10
08
99/7
00
10
60
99/6
00
09
62
99/5
00
03
85
100/6
00
17
63
100/3
00
07
15
100/1
00
01
42
100/2
00
08
60
101/1C
00
16
13
124
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
45/4
00
36
21
45/2
00
22
42
44/5
00
02
73
44/4
00
10
88
44/6
00
05
53
44/2
00
05
40
44/1
00
06
30
37/2F
00
11
98
38/2
00
41
25
[F. No. R-11025(11)/252/2017-OR-I/E-21033]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
नई द ली, 11 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 53
53
53
53.— के56ीय सरकार ने पेWोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूिम मH उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन) अिधिनयम,
1962 (1962 का 50) (िजसे इसमH इसके पf चात् उ0 अिधिनयम कहा गया है) क धारा 3 उप धारा (1) के अधीन जारी क गई, भारत
सरकार के पेWोिलयम और ाकृितक गैस मंKालय क अिधसूचना का.आ. 1074(अ) तारीख 03.04.2017 िजसका काशन भारत के
राजपK संsया 948, भाग II, खGड 3, उप खGड (II) तारीख 06.04.2017 मH कया गया है। इस अिधसूचना मH संल न अनुसूची मH
िविनzदp आंLदेश राhय के मंडल : गोपालपुरम िजला: वेट गोदावरी क भूिम मH, ओडीशा राhय मH पारादीप से तेलंगाना राhय मH
हैदराबाद तक पेWोिलयम उVपाद% के प!रवहन के िलए इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपOरेशन िलिमटेड के ,ारा $याि5वत कए जा रहे “पारादीप-
हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन प!रयोजना” के संबंध मH पाइपलाइन िबछाने के योजन के िलए उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन करने के िलए अपने
आशय क घोषणा क थी:
और उ0 राजपK अिधसूचना क ितयाँ जनता को उपलrध करा दी ग थk। और उ0 अिधिनयम क धारा 6 क उपधारा (1)
के अनुसरण मH सम ािधकारी ने के56ीय सरकार को अपनी !रपोट दे दी है।
और के56ीय सरकार ने उ0 !रपोट पर िवचार करने के पf चात् और यह समाधान हो जाने पर क उ0 भूिम पाइपलाइन
िबछाने के िलए अपेित है, उसमH उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन करने का िविनf चय कया है:
अतः अब, के56ीय सरकार उ0 अिधिनयम क धारा 6 क उपधारा (1) ,ारा द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए एतद् ,ारा
घोषणा करती है क इस अिधसूचना से संल न अनुसूची मH िविनzदp भूिम मH पाइपलाइन िबछाने के उपयोग का अिधकार अNजत कया
जाए:
और के56ीय सरकार उ0 अिधिनयम क धारा 6 क उपधारा (4) ,ारा द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए, यह िनदश देती है
क उ0 भूिम मH उपयोग का अिधकार इस घोषणा के काशन क तारीख से के56ीय सरकार मH िनिहत होने के बजाए सभी िबलंगम% से
मु0 होकर इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपOरेशन िलिमटेड मH िनिहत होगा।
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
िजला: वेट गोदावरी राhय: आ5Lदेश
मंडल का नाम
ाम का नाम
सव न बर
ेK फल
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
125
हे\टेयर
एयर
वग मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
गोपालपुरम
िभमोलु
530/1
00
10
27
529/2
00
05
15
533/1
00
09
01
529/1
00
23
22
536/1
00
22
47
520/2
00
13
96
522
00
19
14
521
01
13
60
गोपालपुरम
वेलाFचंतलागुडेम
325
00
63
85
601 & 602
02
62
97
578
00
24
69
584
00
38
46
585/3
00
16
83
585/1
00
03
80
583/1
00
03
45
590/2C
00
06
30
590/1C
00
11
33
557
00
14
74
556/2
00
23
83
550/1
00
24
52
537
00
30
01
538
00
28
10
539
00
31
09
गोपालपुरम
गोपालपुरम
156/1
00
31
98
155
00
62
15
147
00
49
91
127/2
00
17
62
125
00
38
65
124
00
21
86
223/1A
00
19
49
224
00
48
85
232
00
18
34
126
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
231
00
21
00
226/3
00
22
98
243
00
07
09
242/2C
00
19
29
242/2B
00
00
31
242/2A
00
15
30
242/1A
00
31
89
250/3C
00
25
43
250/3A
00
31
70
249
00
38
79
253/1A
00
02
21
253/3A1
00
10
07
254/8
00
18
35
256/1A
00
02
43
256/2A
00
00
60
गोपालपुरम
कोम!टकुंटा
58
00
31
20
67/2
00
33
01
67/3
00
09
72
48/3A
00
13
97
48/3B
00
01
02
48/2
00
05
62
48/1
00
10
25
1
00
49
83
45
00
36
16
36
00
56
84
35
00
21
72
24
00
19
49
32
00
45
51
109
00
04
77
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
127
111
00
58
44
112/2
00
35
84
121
00
18
13
113
00
05
44
गोपालपुरम
वडलागु5टा
35
00
31
11
34
00
20
05
33
00
30
99
7
00
16
70
8
00
29
57
14
00
06
47
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/252/2017-ओआर-I/ई-21033]
पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 11th January, 2018
S.O. 53.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural
Gas, published in the Gazette of India No. 948 Part-II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii) dated 06.04.2017 vide S.O. Number
1074 (E) dated 03.04.2017 issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals pipelines
(Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) the Central
Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land situated in Mandal Gopalapuram, District
West Godavari in Andhra Pradesh State, specified in the schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of
laying pipeline for the transportation of petroleum products from Paradip in the State of Odisha to Hyderabad in the
State of Telangana by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the "Paradip–Hyderabad Pipeline Project".
And whereas the copies of the Gazette were made available to the public. And whereas the Competent
Authority has under Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, has submitted his report of Central Government.
And whereas, the Central Government after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land
is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of the user therein;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central
Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is
hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central
Government hereby directs that the right of user of the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the
Central Government, vests on the date of publication of the declaration, in Indian Oil Corporation Limited, free from
all encumbrances.
SCHEDULE
District : West Godavari
State : Andhra Pradesh
Name of Mandal
Name of Village
Survey No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Square Metre
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
128
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Gopalapuram
Bhimolu
530/1
00
10
27
529/2
00
05
15
533/1
00
09
01
529/1
00
23
22
536/1
00
22
47
520/2
00
13
96
522
00
19
14
521
01
13
60
Gopalapuram
Vellachintalagudem
325
00
63
85
601 & 602
02
62
97
578
00
24
69
584
00
38
46
585/3
00
16
83
585/1
00
03
80
583/1
00
03
45
590/2C
00
06
30
590/1C
00
11
33
557
00
14
74
556/2
00
23
83
550/1
00
24
52
537
00
30
01
538
00
28
10
539
00
31
09
Gopalapuram
Gopalapuram
156/1
00
31
98
155
00
62
15
147
00
49
91
127/2
00
17
62
125
00
38
65
124
00
21
86
223/1A
00
19
49
224
00
48
85
232
00
18
34
231
00
21
00
226/3
00
22
98
243
00
07
09
242/2C
00
19
29
242/2B
00
00
31
242/2A
00
15
30
242/1A
00
31
89
250/3C
00
25
43
250/3A
00
31
70
249
00
38
79
253/1A
00
02
21
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
129
253/3A1
00
10
07
254/8
00
18
35
256/1A
00
02
43
256/2A
00
00
60
Gopalapuram
Komatikunta
58
00
31
20
67/2
00
33
01
67/3
00
09
72
48/3A
00
13
97
48/3B
00
01
02
48/2
00
05
62
48/1
00
10
25
1
00
49
83
45
00
36
16
36
00
56
84
35
00
21
72
24
00
19
49
32
00
45
51
109
00
04
77
111
00
58
44
112/2
00
35
84
121
00
18
13
113
00
05
44
Gopalapuram
Vadlagunta
35
00
31
11
34
00
20
05
33
00
30
99
7
00
16
70
8
00
29
57
14
00
06
47
[F. No. R-11025(11)/252/2017-OR-I/E-21033]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
नई द ली, 11 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 54
54
54
54.— के56ीय सरकार ने पेWोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूिम मH उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन) अिधिनयम,
1962 (1962 का 50) (िजसे इसमH इसके पात उ0 अिधिनयम कहा गया है) क धारा 3 उप धारा (1) के अधीन जारी क गई, भारत
सरकार के पेWोिलयम और ाकृितक गैस मंKालय क अिधसूचना का.आ. 1073(अ) तारीख 03.04.2017 िजसका काशन भारत के
राजपK संsया 948, भाग II, खGड 3, उप खGड (II) तारीख 06.04.2017 मH कया गया है। इस अिधसूचना मH संल अनुसूची मH
िविनzदp आंLदेश राhय के मंडल : तालपुडी िजला: वेट गोदावरी क भूिम मH, ओडीशा राhय मH पारादीप से तेलंगाना राhय मH
130
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
हैदराबाद तक पेWोिलयम उVपाद% के प!रवहन के िलए इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपरेशन िलिमटेड के ,ारा $याि5वत कए जा रहे “पारादीप-
हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन प!रयोजना” के संबंध मH पाइपलाइन िबछाने के योजन के िलए उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन करने के िलए अपने
आशय क घोषणा क थी:
और उ0 राजपK अिधसूचना क ितयाँ जनता को उपलrध करा दी गई थk। और उ0 अिधिनयम क धारा 6 क उपधारा (1)
के अनुसरण मH सम ािधकारी नH के56ीय सरकार को अपनी !रपोट दे दी है।
और के56ीय सरकार ने उ0 !रपोट पर िवचार करने के पात और यह समाधान हो जाने पर क उ0 भूिम पाइपलाइन
िबछाने के िलए अपेित है, उसमH उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन करने का िविनqचय कया है:
अतः अब, के56ीय सरकार उ0 अिधिनयम क धारा 6 क उपधारा (1) ,ारा द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए ,rn~}kj
घोषणा करती है क इस अिधसूचना से संल अनुसूिच मH िविनzदp भूिम मH पाइपलाइन िबछाने के उपयोग का अिधकार अNजत कया
जाए:
और के56ीय सरकार उ0 अिधिनयम क धारा 6 क उपधारा (4) ,ारा द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए, यह िनदश देती है
क उ0 भूिम मH उपयोग का अिधकार इस घोषणा के काशन क तारीख से के56ीय सरकार मH िनिहत होने के बजाए सभी िबलंगम% से
मु0 होकर इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपरेशन िलिमटेड मH िनिहत होगा।
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
िजला: वेट गोदावरी राhय: आ5Lदेश
मंडल का नाम
ाम का नाम
सव न बर
ेK फल
हे\टेयर
एयर
वग मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
तालपुडी
बयावरम
111/7
00
06
11
111/6
00
00
59
111/9
00
05
81
79/3
00
01
18
79/4
00
09
80
78/1
00
00
14
76/1
00
13
69
76/2
00
15
00
78/2
00
00
74
76/3
00
28
25
तालपुडी
रागोलापली
261/1A
00
08
97
260/5
00
17
95
260/4
00
12
07
254/2
00
31
35
254/1
00
16
46
251/2
00
02
38
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
131
251/1
00
11
18
250/4
00
00
08
252/6
00
10
29
250/2
00
09
22
250/1
00
13
88
249/4
00
17
86
तालपुडी
तुपाकुलागुडेम
247
00
00
90
241
00
26
64
240
00
12
39
232/3
00
04
90
232/4
00
19
00
234
00
10
62
225/1
00
01
42
225/3
00
16
20
225/4
00
13
11
142/2
00
18
33
142/1
00
00
66
142/3
00
15
64
142/4
00
19
59
145
00
44
18
161/1
00
05
11
161/2
00
10
71
162/1
00
05
71
162/4
00
01
28
180
00
03
57
तालपुडी
अादेवरपेटा
216/1
00
17
84
217
00
29
77
214
00
27
12
213
00
00
03
132
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
221/1
00
19
63
221/4
00
00
03
221/3
00
09
06
221/2
00
08
70
228/3
00
12
87
229
00
19
09
281/1
00
12
56
281/2
00
12
71
279/1
00
00
0.19
289
00
17
65
290/2
00
17
42
258/1
00
10
60
273/2
00
09
01
273/1
00
08
17
272/3
00
07
20
272/2
00
03
40
260/1
00
04
04
263/4B
00
02
97
263/3
00
08
48
263/2
00
07
52
263/1
00
08
14
270
00
16
34
358
00
27
65
347
00
00
24
349
00
37
66
348
00
02
02
351/2
00
30
09
352/3A
00
10
73
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
133
352/1
00
08
84
352/2
00
05
56
341/3
00
09
55
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/252/2017-ओआर-I/ई-21033]
पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 11th January, 2018
S.O. 54.— Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural
Gas, published in the Gazette of India No. 948 Part-II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii) dated 06.04.2017 vide S.O. Number
1073 (E) dated 03.04.2017 issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals pipelines
(Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) the Central
Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land situated in Mandal Tallapudi, District West
Godavari in Andhra Pradesh State, specified in the schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying
pipeline for the transportation of petroleum products from Paradip in the State of Odisha to Hyderabad in the State of
Telangana by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the "Paradip–Hyderabad Pipeline Project".
And whereas the copies of the Gazette were made available to the public. And whereas the Competent
Authority has under Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, has submitted his report of Central Government.
And whereas, the Central Government after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land
is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of the user therein;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central
Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is
hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central
Government hereby directs that the right of user of the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the
Central Government, vests on the date of publication of the declaration, in Indian Oil Corporation Limited, free from
all encumbrances.
SCHEDULE
District : West Godavari
State : Andhra Pradesh
Name of Mandal
Name of Village
Survey No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Square Metre
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
Tallapudi
Bayyavaram
111/7
00
06
11
111/6
00
00
59
111/9
00
05
81
79/3
00
01
18
79/4
00
09
80
78/1
00
00
14
76/1
00
13
69
76/2
00
15
00
78/2
00
00
74
76/3
00
28
25
Tallapudi
Ragolapalli
261/1A
00
08
97
260/5
00
17
95
260/4
00
12
07
254/2
00
31
35
134
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
254/1
00
16
46
251/2
00
02
38
251/1
00
11
18
250/4
00
00
08
252/6
00
10
29
250/2
00
09
22
250/1
00
13
88
249/4
00
17
86
Tallapudi
Tupakulagudem
247
00
00
90
241
00
26
64
240
00
12
39
232/3
00
04
90
232/4
00
19
00
234
00
10
62
225/1
00
01
42
225/3
00
16
20
225/4
00
13
11
142/2
00
18
33
142/1
00
00
66
142/3
00
15
64
142/4
00
19
59
145
00
44
18
161/1
00
05
11
161/2
00
10
71
162/1
00
05
71
162/4
00
01
28
180
00
03
57
Tallapudi
Annadevarapeta
216/1
00
17
84
217
00
29
77
214
00
27
12
213
00
00
03
221/1
00
19
63
221/4
00
00
03
221/3
00
09
06
221/2
00
08
70
228/3
00
12
87
229
00
19
09
281/1
00
12
56
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
135
281/2
00
12
71
279/1
00
00
0.19
289
00
17
65
290/2
00
17
42
258/1
00
10
60
273/2
00
09
01
273/1
00
08
17
272/3
00
07
20
272/2
00
03
40
260/1
00
04
04
263/4B
00
02
97
263/3
00
08
48
263/2
00
07
52
263/1
00
08
14
270
00
16
34
358
00
27
65
347
00
00
24
349
00
37
66
348
00
02
02
351/2
00
30
09
352/3A
00
10
73
352/1
00
08
84
352/2
00
05
56
341/3
00
09
55
[F. No. R-11025(11)/252/2017-OR-I/E-21033]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
नई द ली, 11 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 55
55
55
55.— के56ीय सरकार को लोकिहत मH यह आवfयक तीत होता है क पारादीप (ओिड़शा) से हैदराबाद (तेलंगाना)
तक पेWोिलयम उVपाद% के प!रवहन के िलए इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपOरेशन िलिमटेड के ,ारा "पारादीप -हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन" िबछाई जानी
चािहए;
और के56ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन िबछाने के योजन के िलए यह आवfयक तीत होता है क ऐसी भूिम मH जो इस से
उपाबT अनुसूची मH वNणत है और िजस मH उ0 पाइपलाइन िबछाएं जाने का ताव है, उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन कया जाए;
अत: अब, के56ीय सरकार, पेWोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइ5स (भूिम मH उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन) अिधिनयम,1962
(1962 का 50) क धारा 3 क उप-धारा (1) ,ारा द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए, उस भूिम मH उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन करने
के अपने आशय क घोषणा करती है;
कोई ि0, जो उ0 अनुसूची मH वNणत भूिम मH िहतबT है, उस तारीख से िजसको इस अिधसूचना से यु0 भारत के राजपK
क ितयाँ साधारण जनता को उपलrध करा दी जाती है, इ\ कस दन के भीतर भूिम के नीचे पाइपलाइन िबछाए जाने के िलए उसमH
136
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
उपयोग के अिधकार के अजन के स ब5ध मH 8ी दलीप कुमार महांित, सम ािधकारी, इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपOरेशन िलिमटेड, पारादीप -
हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन प!रयोजना, तृतीय तल, आलोक भारती टावर ,शहीद नगर,भुवनेf वर -751007, ओिड़शा को िलिखत gप मH
आेप भेज सकेगा I
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/236/2017-ओआर-I/ई-13717]
पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 11th January, 2018
S.O. 55.— Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the
transportation of petroleum products from Paradip (Odisha) to Hyderabad (Telangana), “Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline”
should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;
तहसील-जटणी
िजला - खोTा
राhय–ओिड़शा
गाँव का नाम
nलॉट नं.
ेKफल
हे\टयर
एयर
वग मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
पािGडआबील
428
00
21
56
434
00
01
09
382
00
09
28
381
00
04
99
361
00
05
83
360
00
11
02
357
00
01
72
359
00
00
69
358
00
00
73
354
00
00
15
440
00
01
86
441
00
00
55
442
00
11
92
427
00
01
53
426
00
01
46
348
00
02
43
344
00
00
72
345
00
00
10
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
137
And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary
to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the
schedule annexed hereto;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and
Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby
declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty-one days from the date on
which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the general public, object in
writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Sri Dillip Kumar
Mohanty, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline Project, 3rd Floor, Alok
Bharati Tower, Saheed Nagar, Bhubaneswar- 751007, (Odisha).
SCHEDULE
Tehsil : JATANI
District : KHORDHA
State : ODISHA
Name of the Village
Plot No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
PANDIABIL
428
00
21
56
434
00
01
09
382
00
09
28
381
00
04
99
361
00
05
83
360
00
11
02
357
00
01
72
359
00
00
69
358
00
00
73
354
00
00
15
440
00
01
86
441
00
00
55
442
00
11
92
427
00
01
53
426
00
01
46
348
00
02
43
344
00
00
72
345
00
00
10
[F. No. R-11025(11)/236/2017-OR-I/E-13717]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
नई द ली, 11 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 56
56
56
56.— के56ीय सरकार को ऐसा तीत होता है क लोक िहत मH यह आवfयक है क हदीया - बरौनी पाइपलाइन
पा!रयोजना के अ5तगत पेWोिलयम पदाथu के प!रवहन हेतु पिम बंगाल राhय के हदीया !रफ़ाइनरी से िबहार राhय के बरौनी
!रफ़ाइनरी तक इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपOरेशन िलिमटेड ,ारा पाइपलाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए;
138
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
और के56ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन िबछाने के योजन के िलए यह आवfयक तीत होता है क उस भूिम मH िजसके
भीतर उ0 पाइपलाइन िबछाई जाने का ताव है और जो इस अिधसूचना से संल अनुसूची मे वNणत है, उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन
कया जाए ;
अतः अब, के56ीय सरकार, पेWोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइंस (भूिम मH उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन) अिधिनयम, 1962
(1962 का 50) क धारा 3 क उप धारा (1) ,ारा दत शि0य% का योग करते 3ए, उस भूिम मH उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन करने
के अपने आशय क घोषणा करती है ;
कोई ि0, जो उ0 अनुसूची मH वNणत भूिम मH िहतबT है, उस तारीख से िजसको, भारत के राजपK मH यथा कािशत इस
अिधसूचना क ितयाँ साधारण जनता को उपलrध करा दी जाती ह, इ\ कस दन के अ5दर, भूिम के भीतर पाइपलाइन िबछाए जाने
हेतु उपयोग के अिधकार के अजन के िलए, 8ी भुवनेf वर िम8ा, से॰ िन॰ अपर सिचव िबहार सरकार व सम ािधकारी, इंिडयन ऑयल
कॉपOरेशन िलिमटेड (पाइपलाइंस िडिवजन), बी॰ के॰ पी॰ एल॰ मुsयालय प!रसर, पो॰ बरौनी आयल !रफ़ाइनरी, िजला बेगूसराय,
िपन– 851114 (िबहार) को िलिखत gप मे आेप भेज सकेगा ।
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
िजला : पटना राhय : िबहार
अंचल
मौज़ा का नाम
सव / nलाट न बर
ेKफल
हे\टेयर
एयर
वग मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
मोकामा
जलाल पुर नौरंगा - 13
631
00
01
06
630
00
12
71
2677
00
09
93
629
00
07
37
628
00
06
54
627
00
05
57
626
00
06
52
625
00
09
15
624
00
02
76
442
00
01
85
443
00
02
84
162
00
14
95
161
00
03
75
160
00
04
84
134
00
09
01
141
00
03
60
139
00
04
12
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
139
140
00
02
75
138
00
01
81
130
00
03
36
143
00
13
77
144
00
10
13
145
00
00
59
126
00
06
61
मोकामा
राम पुर डुमरा - 15
1423
00
00
62
1422
00
17
59
1421
00
18
47
1377
00
18
47
1378
00
01
75
1356
00
13
02
1311
00
01
18
1312
00
08
00
1313
00
07
46
1314
00
00
52
1286
00
10
43
1277
00
09
48
1278
00
09
05
3928
00
15
02
1145
00
20
88
1150
00
03
20
1148
00
10
08
1147
00
14
98
3707
00
00
20
मोकामा
मरांची - 19
1277
00
14
55
1400
00
05
68
1271
00
30
68
140
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1266
00
11
99
1425
00
03
79
1426
00
00
33
1427
00
08
02
1428
00
04
08
1429
00
03
04
1430
00
03
71
1263
00
05
47
1435
00
05
28
1455
00
00
20
1456
00
06
63
1457
00
02
38
8555
00
05
26
1459
00
03
11
1487
00
16
68
1488
00
14
28
8520
00
05
38
1561
00
04
17
1563
00
01
99
1564
00
02
82
1565
00
02
81
1570
00
06
21
1571
00
09
58
1572
00
03
58
1573
00
06
02
1654
00
03
08
1653
00
01
54
1657
00
02
52
8523
00
02
20
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
141
1658
00
04
67
1659
00
02
75
1660
00
00
33
1664
00
06
26
1663
00
01
19
1679
00
05
81
1680
00
03
63
8583
00
02
38
1681
00
00
40
8582
00
11
70
8581
00
04
50
8160
00
05
43
8170
00
00
20
8169
00
01
87
8167
00
01
99
8166
00
02
66
8165
00
02
62
8164
00
01
84
8163
00
02
57
8162
00
02
75
8161
00
03
14
521
00
03
07
519
00
03
31
520
00
07
10
517
00
00
20
8181
00
03
63
8207
00
07
88
8206
00
01
54
356
00
03
18
355
00
00
25
354
00
26
08
142
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
353
00
04
69
305
00
00
99
306
00
02
32
8228
00
03
08
303
00
05
28
304
00
01
36
301
00
06
32
283
00
05
49
280
00
12
35
8241
00
03
89
255
00
06
00
253
00
05
12
247
00
10
29
241
00
03
80
8274
00
02
98
8273
00
04
50
240
00
04
35
8279
00
03
19
8278
00
03
00
191
00
07
86
190
00
07
07
189
00
07
73
8136
00
04
54
185
00
03
52
168
00
02
14
169
00
06
10
164
00
05
45
136
00
11
64
135
00
03
10
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
143
137
00
03
73
117
00
03
07
116
00
03
46
97
00
31
36
82
00
07
83
70
00
10
73
71
00
02
01
65
00
07
60
62
00
05
81
61
00
07
90
49
00
08
49
8087
00
01
70
8080
00
01
80
8068
00
04
24
8057
00
00
53
8058
00
06
34
41
00
13
15
39
00
06
49
38
00
32
45
37
00
00
81
मोकामा
हिथदह खुरद - 21
564
00
00
20
563
00
00
64
562
00
03
62
561
00
03
19
560
00
01
65
559
00
01
23
558
00
00
77
557
00
00
42
555
00
02
86
144
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
556
00
06
25
514
00
06
15
513
00
06
18
512
00
11
71
302
00
07
25
507
00
12
55
475
00
08
41
476
00
09
73
477
00
14
09
474
00
00
20
500
00
00
20
478
00
00
24
473
00
06
22
464
00
04
34
465
00
05
69
408
00
02
82
405
00
06
86
404
00
04
39
400
00
00
20
402
00
17
57
390
00
03
79
389
00
01
28
388
00
00
20
508
00
10
61
509
00
10
28
520
00
11
36
542
00
01
21
521
00
00
27
541
00
04
94
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
145
540
00
10
85
588
00
06
84
589
00
01
64
587
00
01
04
590
00
03
40
591
00
04
05
586
00
00
20
592
00
09
05
593
00
01
39
533
00
24
39
607
00
00
20
608
00
04
06
609
00
01
25
611
00
05
26
612
00
01
42
613
00
01
10
614
00
02
01
616
00
07
37
617
00
15
33
647
00
04
85
648
00
05
30
650
00
02
52
653
00
01
46
657
00
01
40
658
00
02
50
659
00
11
00
660
00
03
01
661
00
03
22
मोकामा
हिथदहबुजुग - 20
2421
00
22
30
2419
00
03
01
146
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2416
00
03
90
2448
00
02
73
2408
00
00
96
2409
00
10
92
1099
00
03
40
2403
00
00
56
2402
00
09
27
2399
00
03
33
2386
00
03
44
2384
00
01
14
2380
00
01
52
2373
00
01
74
2368
00
01
15
2369
00
00
29
2363
00
01
84
2362
00
01
29
2360
00
00
98
2359
00
01
47
2354
00
01
41
2353
00
02
17
2352
00
02
41
2209
00
02
28
2211
00
02
94
2213
00
01
35
2214
00
01
94
2215
00
04
13
2218
00
01
78
2219
00
01
62
2222
00
00
20
2224
00
02
90
2225
00
03
44
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
147
2228
00
02
99
2230
00
00
20
2229
00
03
70
2155
00
02
02
2156
00
00
86
2180
00
00
57
2257
00
02
50
2153
00
00
49
2158
00
01
35
2152
00
00
47
2159
00
03
87
2145
00
03
96
2140
00
02
15
2139
00
02
01
2134
00
01
68
2138
00
00
26
2135
00
00
87
2122
00
08
02
2121
00
08
72
2136
00
00
75
2115
00
05
09
2114
00
03
41
2059
00
07
31
1149
00
03
76
2029
00
02
85
2030
00
01
60
2031
00
02
68
2028
00
00
41
2032
00
02
03
2017
00
03
34
148
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2013
00
02
18
2008
00
03
16
2007
00
00
39
2006
00
00
26
2002
00
10
59
2009
00
00
44
2010
00
01
19
1653
00
04
73
1595
00
00
20
1651
00
03
94
1652
00
02
41
1654
00
00
29
1614
00
05
82
1650
00
02
01
1647
00
00
94
1617
00
00
66
1618
00
01
01
1616
00
05
91
1615
00
04
17
1631
00
07
29
1630
00
02
45
1632
00
00
20
2833
00
04
85
2834
00
00
20
252
00
06
29
251
00
00
20
250
00
02
17
231
00
01
06
220
00
00
50
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
149
221
00
24
97
2847
00
07
80
मोकामा
कसया दयारामराचk - 10
639
00
03
07
640
00
01
49
641
00
01
81
644
00
04
96
645
00
02
24
646
00
01
16
647
00
00
94
648
00
02
41
649
00
01
74
652
00
02
20
656
00
03
34
655
00
00
20
662
00
01
71
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/251/2017-ओआर-I/ई-20885]
पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 11th January, 2018
S.O. 56.— Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the
transportation of Petroleum Products from Haldia Refinery in the state of West Bengal to Barauni Refinery in the State
of Bihar a pipeline should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited.
And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary
to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the
Schedule annexed hereto;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and
Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby
declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on
which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the general public, object in
writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri. Bhubneshwar
Mishra, Additional Secretary (Retd.), Govt. of Bihar & Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Pipeline
Division, BKPL Head Quarter, Post- Barauni Oil Refinery, District – Begusarai, Bihar – 851114.
SCHEDULE
District : Patna State : Bihar
Anchal
Name of Mouza
Survey / Plot
No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Square
Metre
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
150
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Mokama
Jalalpur Nauranga - 13
631
00
01
06
630
00
12
71
2677
00
09
93
629
00
07
37
628
00
06
54
627
00
05
57
626
00
06
52
625
00
09
15
624
00
02
76
442
00
01
85
443
00
02
84
162
00
14
95
161
00
03
75
160
00
04
84
134
00
09
01
141
00
03
60
139
00
04
12
140
00
02
75
138
00
01
81
130
00
03
36
143
00
13
77
144
00
10
13
145
00
00
59
126
00
06
61
Mokama
Rampur Dumra - 15
1423
00
00
62
1422
00
17
59
1421
00
18
47
1377
00
18
47
1378
00
01
75
1356
00
13
02
1311
00
01
18
1312
00
08
00
1313
00
07
46
1314
00
00
52
1286
00
10
43
1277
00
09
48
1278
00
09
05
3928
00
15
02
1145
00
20
88
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
151
1150
00
03
20
1148
00
10
08
1147
00
14
98
3707
00
00
20
Mokama
Maranchi -19
1277
00
14
55
1400
00
05
68
1271
00
30
68
1266
00
11
99
1425
00
03
79
1426
00
00
33
1427
00
08
02
1428
00
04
08
1429
00
03
04
1430
00
03
71
1263
00
05
47
1435
00
05
28
1455
00
00
20
1456
00
06
63
1457
00
02
38
8555
00
05
26
1459
00
03
11
1487
00
16
68
1488
00
14
28
8520
00
05
38
1561
00
04
17
1563
00
01
99
1564
00
02
82
1565
00
02
81
1570
00
06
21
1571
00
09
58
1572
00
03
58
1573
00
06
02
1654
00
03
08
1653
00
01
54
1657
00
02
52
8523
00
02
20
1658
00
04
67
1659
00
02
75
1660
00
00
33
152
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1664
00
06
26
1663
00
01
19
1679
00
05
81
1680
00
03
63
8583
00
02
38
1681
00
00
40
8582
00
11
70
8581
00
04
50
8160
00
05
43
8170
00
00
20
8169
00
01
87
8167
00
01
99
8166
00
02
66
8165
00
02
62
8164
00
01
84
8163
00
02
57
8162
00
02
75
8161
00
03
14
521
00
03
07
519
00
03
31
520
00
07
10
517
00
00
20
8181
00
03
63
8207
00
07
88
8206
00
01
54
356
00
03
18
355
00
00
25
354
00
26
08
353
00
04
69
305
00
00
99
306
00
02
32
8228
00
03
08
303
00
05
28
304
00
01
36
301
00
06
32
283
00
05
49
280
00
12
35
8241
00
03
89
255
00
06
00
253
00
05
12
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
153
247
00
10
29
241
00
03
80
8274
00
02
98
8273
00
04
50
240
00
04
35
8279
00
03
19
8278
00
03
00
191
00
07
86
190
00
07
07
189
00
07
73
8136
00
04
54
185
00
03
52
168
00
02
14
169
00
06
10
164
00
05
45
136
00
11
64
135
00
03
10
137
00
03
73
117
00
03
07
116
00
03
46
97
00
31
36
82
00
07
83
70
00
10
73
71
00
02
01
65
00
07
60
62
00
05
81
61
00
07
90
49
00
08
49
8087
00
01
70
8080
00
01
80
8068
00
04
24
8057
00
00
53
8058
00
06
34
41
00
13
15
39
00
06
49
38
00
32
45
37
00
00
81
Mokama
Hathidhah Khurd - 21
564
00
00
20
563
00
00
64
562
00
03
62
561
00
03
19
154
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
560
00
01
65
559
00
01
23
558
00
00
77
557
00
00
42
555
00
02
86
556
00
06
25
514
00
06
15
513
00
06
18
512
00
11
71
302
00
07
25
507
00
12
55
475
00
08
41
476
00
09
73
477
00
14
09
474
00
00
20
500
00
00
20
478
00
00
24
473
00
06
22
464
00
04
34
465
00
05
69
408
00
02
82
405
00
06
86
404
00
04
39
400
00
00
20
402
00
17
57
390
00
03
79
389
00
01
28
388
00
00
20
508
00
10
61
509
00
10
28
520
00
11
36
542
00
01
21
521
00
00
27
541
00
04
94
540
00
10
85
588
00
06
84
589
00
01
64
587
00
01
04
590
00
03
40
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
155
591
00
04
05
586
00
00
20
592
00
09
05
593
00
01
39
533
00
24
39
607
00
00
20
608
00
04
06
609
00
01
25
611
00
05
26
612
00
01
42
613
00
01
10
614
00
02
01
616
00
07
37
617
00
15
33
647
00
04
85
648
00
05
30
650
00
02
52
653
00
01
46
657
00
01
40
658
00
02
50
659
00
11
00
660
00
03
01
661
00
03
22
Mokama
Hathidah Buzurg - 20
2421
00
22
30
2419
00
03
01
2416
00
03
90
2448
00
02
73
2408
00
00
96
2409
00
10
92
1099
00
03
40
2403
00
00
56
2402
00
09
27
2399
00
03
33
2386
00
03
44
2384
00
01
14
2380
00
01
52
2373
00
01
74
2368
00
01
15
2369
00
00
29
156
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2363
00
01
84
2362
00
01
29
2360
00
00
98
2359
00
01
47
2354
00
01
41
2353
00
02
17
2352
00
02
41
2209
00
02
28
2211
00
02
94
2213
00
01
35
2214
00
01
94
2215
00
04
13
2218
00
01
78
2219
00
01
62
2222
00
00
20
2224
00
02
90
2225
00
03
44
2228
00
02
99
2230
00
00
20
2229
00
03
70
2155
00
02
02
2156
00
00
86
2180
00
00
57
2257
00
02
50
2153
00
00
49
2158
00
01
35
2152
00
00
47
2159
00
03
87
2145
00
03
96
2140
00
02
15
2139
00
02
01
2134
00
01
68
2138
00
00
26
2135
00
00
87
2122
00
08
02
2121
00
08
72
2136
00
00
75
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
157
2115
00
05
09
2114
00
03
41
2059
00
07
31
1149
00
03
76
2029
00
02
85
2030
00
01
60
2031
00
02
68
2028
00
00
41
2032
00
02
03
2017
00
03
34
2013
00
02
18
2008
00
03
16
2007
00
00
39
2006
00
00
26
2002
00
10
59
2009
00
00
44
2010
00
01
19
1653
00
04
73
1595
00
00
20
1651
00
03
94
1652
00
02
41
1654
00
00
29
1614
00
05
82
1650
00
02
01
1647
00
00
94
1617
00
00
66
1618
00
01
01
1616
00
05
91
1615
00
04
17
1631
00
07
29
1630
00
02
45
1632
00
00
20
2833
00
04
85
2834
00
00
20
252
00
06
29
251
00
00
20
250
00
02
17
231
00
01
06
220
00
00
50
158
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
221
00
24
97
2847
00
07
80
Mokama
Kasaya Diyara Maranchi - 10
639
00
03
07
640
00
01
49
641
00
01
81
644
00
04
96
645
00
02
24
646
00
01
16
647
00
00
94
648
00
02
41
649
00
01
74
652
00
02
20
656
00
03
34
655
00
00
20
662
00
01
71
[F. No. R-11025(11)/251/2017-OR-I/E-20885]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
नई द ली, 11 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 57
57
57
57.— के56ीय सरकार ने पेWोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूिम मH उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन) अिधिनयम,
1962 (1962 का 50) (िजसे इसमH इसके पात उ0 अिधिनयम कहा गया है) क धारा 3 उप धारा (1) के अधीन जारी क गई, भारत
सरकार के पेWोिलयम और ाकृितक गैस मंKालय क अिधसूचना का.आ. 1071(अ) तारीख 03.04.2017 िजसका काशन भारत के
राजपK संsया 948, भाग II, खGड 3, उप खGड (II) तारीख 06.04.2017 मH कया गया है। इस अिधसूचना मH संल अनुसूची मH
िविनzदp आंLदेश राhय के मंडल : कोयालगुडेम िजला: वेट गोदावरी क भूिम मH, ओडीशा राhय मH पारादीप से तेलंगाना राhय मH
हैदराबाद तक पेWोिलयम उVपाद% के प!रवहन के िलए इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपOरेशन िलिमटेड के ,ारा $याि5वत कए जा रहे “पारादीप-
हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन प!रयोजना” के संबंध मH पाइपलाइन िबछाने के योजन के िलए उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन करने के िलए अपने
आशय क घोषणा क थी:
और उ0 राजपK अिधसूचना क ितयाँ जनता को उपलrध करा दी गई थk। और उ0 अिधिनयम क धारा 6 क उपधारा (1)
के अनुसरण मH सम ािधकारी नH के56ीय सरकार को अपनी !रपोट दे दी है।
और के56ीय सरकार ने उ0 !रपोट पर िवचार करने के पात और यह समाधान हो जाने पर क उ0 भूिम पाइपलाइन
िबछाने के िलए अपेित है, उसमH उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन करने का िविनf चय कया है:
अतः अब, के56ीय सरकार उ0 अिधिनयम क धारा 6 क उपधारा (1) ,ारा द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए एतद् ,ारा
घोषणा करती है क इस अिधसूचना से संल अनुसूची मH िविनzदp भूिम मH पाइपलाइन िबछाने के उपयोग का अिधकार अNजत कया
जाए:
और के56ीय सरकार उ0 अिधिनयम क धारा 6 क उपधारा (4) ,ारा द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए, यह िनदश देती है
क उ0 भूिम मH उपयोग का अिधकार इस घोषणा के काशन क तारीख से के56ीय सरकार मH िनिहत होने के बजाए सभी िबलंगम% से
मु0 होकर इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपOरेशन िलिमटेड मH िनिहत होगा।
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
िजला: वेट गोदावरी राhय: आ5Lदेश
मंडल का नाम
ाम का नाम
सव न बर
ेKफल
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
159
हे\टेयर
एयर
वग मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
कोयालागुडेम
कंका6पुरम
95
00
13
97
98/1
00
00
35
91
00
59
02
88/2
00
05
78
89
00
51
75
68/4
00
04
25
69/1
00
16
06
69/2
00
16
13
70/1
00
02
12
65/3
00
38
19
65/1
00
08
71
64/2
00
19
90
55/3
00
10
92
55/1
00
16
13
55/2
00
05
01
59/9
00
05
40
59/8
00
05
48
59/7
00
06
35
59/6
00
12
83
59/4
00
05
75
59/3
00
03
20
59/1
00
03
18
कोयालागुडेम
येर पेटा
232/4
00
03
31
233
00
31
73
230/2
00
25
57
229/1
00
08
81
235/1
00
18
88
228/3
00
17
01
236
00
02
68
160
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
237/1
00
22
93
221/3
00
07
28
220/3
00
14
44
220/1
00
23
55
220/2
00
06
68
218
00
00
59
198/2
00
00
0.19
198/3
00
17
97
199
00
00
81
200/3
00
15
99
200/4
00
21
18
212/2
00
03
53
212/1
00
05
05
212/4
00
00
07
200/5
00
04
11
201/6
00
15
59
201/5
00
03
81
201/4
00
09
28
201/3
00
02
81
202/1
00
09
15
183
00
42
53
कोयालागुडेम
राजवाराम
518
00
12
12
516
00
22
11
509/1
00
01
55
509/2
00
16
88
510
00
02
93
508
00
27
81
507
00
10
81
495
00
05
84
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
161
496/6
00
04
99
496/5
00
03
70
496/4
00
01
73
496/3
00
00
06
490/1
00
18
65
490/2
00
16
88
488/1
00
00
08
488/2
00
01
90
489/2
00
07
15
486/2
00
21
19
485
00
45
21
484/1
00
01
09
245/2
00
00
09
248/3
00
07
36
248/2
00
14
71
248/1
00
03
24
245/1
00
17
28
246/2
00
03
95
246/1
00
01
49
239/1
00
13
31
239/3
00
18
38
239/2
00
07
35
238/1
00
09
87
225/1
00
06
01
225/2
00
20
57
225/3
00
06
04
223/4
00
09
60
223/3
00
08
57
223/2
00
07
97
223/1
00
01
35
162
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
222/B
00
15
25
222/A
00
11
85
229
00
00
90
220/3
00
13
21
220/2
00
22
23
220/1
00
01
86
218
00
04
52
219/1
00
10
90
219/2
00
07
15
219/3A
00
06
75
212
00
00
14
211/1
00
17
81
210/2A
00
21
88
210/1A
00
15
98
210/3A
00
21
88
209/2A
00
18
65
209/1A
00
27
46
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/252/2017-ओआर-I/ई-21033]
पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 11th January, 2018
S.O. 57.— Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural
Gas, published in the Gazette of India No. 948 Part-II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii) dated 06.04.2017 vide S.O. Number
1071 (E) dated 03.04.2017 issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals pipelines
(Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) the Central
Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land situated in Mandal Koyyalagudem, District
West Godavari in Andhra Pradesh State, specified in the schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of
laying pipeline for the transportation of petroleum products from Paradip in the State of Odisha to Hyderabad in the
State of Telangana by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the "Paradip–Hyderabad Pipeline Project".
And whereas the copies of the Gazette were made available to the public. And whereas the Competent
Authority has under Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, has submitted his report of Central Government.
And whereas, the Central Government after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land
is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of the user therein;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central
Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is
hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central
Government hereby directs that the right of user of the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
163
Central Government, vests on the date of publication of the declaration, in India Oil Corporation Limited, free from all
encumbrances.
SCHEDULE
District : West Godavari
State : Andhra Pradesh
Name of Mandal
Name of Village
Survey No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Square Metre
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
Koyyalagudem
Kankadripuram
95
00
13
97
98/1
00
00
35
91
00
59
02
88/2
00
05
78
89
00
51
75
68/4
00
04
25
69/1
00
16
06
69/2
00
16
13
70/1
00
02
12
65/3
00
38
19
65/1
00
08
71
64/2
00
19
90
55/3
00
10
92
55/1
00
16
13
55/2
00
05
01
59/9
00
05
40
59/8
00
05
48
59/7
00
06
35
59/6
00
12
83
59/4
00
05
75
59/3
00
03
20
59/1
00
03
18
Koyyalagudem
Yerrampeta
232/4
00
03
31
233
00
31
73
230/2
00
25
57
229/1
00
08
81
235/1
00
18
88
228/3
00
17
01
236
00
02
68
237/1
00
22
93
221/3
00
07
28
220/3
00
14
44
220/1
00
23
55
164
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
220/2
00
06
68
218
00
00
59
198/2
00
00
0.19
198/3
00
17
97
199
00
00
81
200/3
00
15
99
200/4
00
21
18
212/2
00
03
53
212/1
00
05
05
212/4
00
00
07
200/5
00
04
11
201/6
00
15
59
201/5
00
03
81
201/4
00
09
28
201/3
00
02
81
202/1
00
09
15
183
00
42
53
Koyyalagudem
Rajavaram
518
00
12
12
516
00
22
11
509/1
00
01
55
509/2
00
16
88
510
00
02
93
508
00
27
81
507
00
10
81
495
00
05
84
496/6
00
04
99
496/5
00
03
70
496/4
00
01
73
496/3
00
00
06
490/1
00
18
65
490/2
00
16
88
488/1
00
00
08
488/2
00
01
90
489/2
00
07
15
486/2
00
21
19
485
00
45
21
484/1
00
01
09
245/2
00
00
09
248/3
00
07
36
248/2
00
14
71
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
165
248/1
00
03
24
245/1
00
17
28
246/2
00
03
95
246/1
00
01
49
239/1
00
13
31
239/3
00
18
38
239/2
00
07
35
238/1
00
09
87
225/1
00
06
01
225/2
00
20
57
225/3
00
06
04
223/4
00
09
60
223/3
00
08
57
223/2
00
07
97
223/1
00
01
35
222/B
00
15
25
222/A
00
11
85
229
00
00
90
220/3
00
13
21
220/2
00
22
23
220/1
00
01
86
218
00
04
52
219/1
00
10
90
219/2
00
07
15
219/3A
00
06
75
212
00
00
14
211/1
00
17
81
210/2A
00
21
88
210/1A
00
15
98
210/3A
00
21
88
209/2A
00
18
65
209/1A
00
27
46
[F. No. R-11025(11)/252/2017-OR-I/E-21033]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
नई द ली, 11 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 58
58
58
58.— के56ीय सरकार ने पेWोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूिम मH उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन) अिधिनयम,
1962 (1962 का 50) (िजसे इसमH इसके पात उ0 अिधिनयम कहा गया है) क धारा 3 उप धारा (1) के अधीन जारी क गई, भारत
सरकार के पेWोिलयम और ाकृितक गैस मंKालय क अिधसूचना का.आ. 1072(अ) तारीख 03.04.2017 िजसका काशन भारत के
राजपK संsया 948, भाग II, खGड 3, उप खGड (II) तारीख 06.04.2017 मH कया गया है। इस अिधसूचना मH संल अनुसूची मH
166
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
िविनzदp आंLदेश राhय के मंडल : पोलावरम िजला: पिम गोदावरी क भूिम मH, ओडीशा राhय मH पारादीप से तेलंगाना राhय मH
हैदराबाद तक पेWोिलयम उVपाद% के प!रवहन के िलए इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपरेशन िलिमटेड के ,ारा $याि5वत कए जा रहे “पारादीप-
हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन प!रयोजना” के संबंध मH पाइपलाइन िबछाने के योजन के िलए उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन करने के िलए अपने
आशय क घोषणा क थी:
और उ0 राजपK अिधसूचना क ितयाँ जनता को उपलrध करा दी गई थk। और उ0 अिधिनयम क धारा 6 क उपधारा (1)
के अनुसरण मH सम ािधकारी नH के56ीय सरकार को अपनी !रपोट दे दी है।
और के56ीय सरकार ने उ0 !रपोट पर िवचार करने के पात और यह समाधान हो जाने पर क उ0 भूिम पाइपलाइन
िबछाने के िलए अपेित है, उसमH उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन करने का िविनf चय कया है:
अतः अब, के56ीय सरकार उ0 अिधिनयम क धारा 6 क उपधारा (1) ,ारा द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए ,rn~}kjk
घोषणा करती है क इस अिधसूचना से संल अनुसूिच मH िविनzदp भूिम मH पाइपलाइन िबछाने के उपयोग का अिधकार अNजत कया
जाए:
और के56ीय सरकार उ0 अिधिनयम क धारा 6 क उपधारा (4) ,ारा द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए, यह िनदश देती है
क उ0 भूिम मH उपयोग का अिधकार इस घोषणा के काशन क तारीख से के56ीय सरकार मH िनिहत होने के बजाए सभी िबलंगम% से
मु0 होकर इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपरेशन िलिमटेड मH िनिहत होगा।
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
िजला: वेट गोदावरी राhय: आ5Lदेश
मंडल का नाम
ाम का नाम
सव न बर
ेK फल
हे\टेयर
एयर
वग मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
पोलावरम
गुटाला
833/3A
00
09
98
833/2
00
03
93
833/4
00
07
84
831/2
00
02
46
831/3
00
28
12
832/1
00
07
86
806/2
00
21
78
806/1
00
01
96
807
00
26
72
797
00
01
18
796/2
00
00
80
789/3
00
36
11
789/2
00
18
47
790/1A
00
05
85
790/3
00
15
14
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
167
790/2
00
08
57
791/2
00
01
07
791/1
00
12
57
774/1
00
04
54
774/2
00
21
33
773/1
00
11
88
768/7
00
13
18
769/4
00
15
80
769/3
00
21
96
769/2
00
04
51
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/252/2017-ओआर-I/ई-21033]
पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 11th January, 2018
S.O. 58.— Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural
Gas, published in the Gazette of India No. 948 Part-II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii) dated 06.04.2017 vide S.O. Number
1072 (E) dated 03.04.2017 issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals pipelines
(Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) the Central
Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land situated in Mandal polavaram, District West
Godavari in Andhra Pradesh State, specified in the schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying
pipeline for the transportation of petroleum products from Paradip in the State of Odisha to Hyderabad in the State of
Telangana by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the "Paradip–Hyderabad Pipeline Project".
And whereas the copies of the Gazette were made available to the public. And whereas the Competent
Authority has under Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, has submitted his report of Central Government.
And whereas, the Central Government after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land
is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of the user therein;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central
Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is
hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central
Government hereby directs that the right of user of the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the
Central Government, vests on the date of publication of the declaration, in India Oil Corporation Limited, free from all
encumbrances.
SCHEDULE
District : West Godavari
State : Andhra Pradesh
Name of Mandal
Name of Village
Survey No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Square Metre
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
Polavaram
Gutala
833/3A
00
09
98
168
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
833/2
00
03
93
833/4
00
07
84
831/2
00
02
46
831/3
00
28
12
832/1
00
07
86
806/2
00
21
78
806/1
00
01
96
807
00
26
72
797
00
01
18
796/2
00
00
80
789/3
00
36
11
789/2
00
18
47
790/1A
00
05
85
790/3
00
15
14
790/2
00
08
57
791/2
00
01
07
791/1
00
12
57
774/1
00
04
54
774/2
00
21
33
773/1
00
11
88
768/7
00
13
18
769/4
00
15
80
769/3
00
21
96
769/2
00
04
51
[F. No. R-11025(11)/252/2017-OR-I/E-21033]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
नई द ली, 11 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 59
59
59
59.—के56ीय सरकार ने पेWोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूिम मH उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन) अिधिनयम,
1962 (1962 का 50) (िजसे इसमH इसके पात उ0 अिधिनयम कहा गया है) क धारा 3 उप धारा (1) के अधीन जारी क गई, भारत
सरकार के पेWोिलयम और ाकृितक गैस मंKालय क अिधसूचना का.आ. 1070(अ) तारीख 03.04.2017 िजसका काशन भारत के
राजपK संsया 947, भाग II, खGड 3, उप खGड (II) तारीख 06.04.2017 मH कया गया है। इस अिधसूचना मH संल अनुसूची मH
िविनzदp आंLदेश राhय के मंडल : जंगारेीगूडेम िजला: पिम गोदावरी क भूिम मH, ओडीशा राhय मH पारादीप से तेलंगाना राhय मH
हैदराबाद तक पेWोिलयम उVपाद% के प!रवहन के िलए इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपरेशन िलिमटेड के ,ारा $याि5वत कए जा रहे “पारादीप-
हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन प!रयोजना” के संबंध मH पाइपलाइन िबछाने के योजन के िलए उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन करने के िलए अपने
आशय क घोषणा क थी:
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
169
और उ0 राजपK अिधसूचना क ितयाँ जनता को उपलrध करा दी गई थk। और उ0 अिधिनयम क धारा 6 क उपधारा (1)
के अनुसरण मH सम ािधकारी नH के56ीय सरकार को अपनी !रपोट दे दी है।
और के56ीय सरकार ने उ0 !रपोट पर िवचार करने के पात और यह समाधान हो जाने पर क उ0 भूिम पाइपलाइन
िबछाने के िलए अपेित है, उसमH उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन करने का िविनf चय कया है:
अतः अब, के56ीय सरकार उ0 अिधिनयम क धारा 6 क उपधारा (1) ,ारा द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए एतद् ,ारा
घोषणा करती है क इस अिधसूचना से संल अनुसूिच मH िविनzदp भूिम मH पाइपलाइन िबछाने के उपयोग का अिधकार अNजत कया
जाए:
और के56ीय सरकार उ0 अिधिनयम क धारा 6 क उपधारा (4) ,ारा द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए, यह िनदश देती है
क उ0 भूिम मH उपयोग का अिधकार इस घोषणा के काशन क तारीख से के56ीय सरकार मH िनिहत होने के बजाए सभी िबलंगम% से
मु0 होकर इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपरेशन िलिमटेड मH िनिहत होगा।
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
िजला: वेट गोदावरी राhय: आ5Lदेश
मंडल का नाम
ाम का नाम
सव न बर
ेKफल
हे\टेयर
एयर
वग मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
जंगारेीगुडेम
िन मालागुडेम
199
00
00
10
198
00
31
14
254
00
61
85
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/252/2017-ओआर-I/ई-21033]
पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 11th January, 2018
S.O. 59.— Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural
Gas, published in the Gazette of India No. 947 Part-II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii) dated 06.04.2017 vide S.O. Number
1070 (E) dated 03.04.2017 issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals pipelines
(Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) the Central
Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land situated in Mandal Jangareddigudem, District
West Godavari in Andhra Pradesh State, specified in the schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of
laying pipeline for the transportation of petroleum products from Paradip in the State of Odisha to Hyderabad in the
State of Telangana by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the "Paradip–Hyderabad Pipeline Project".
And whereas the copies of the Gazette were made available to the public. And whereas the Competent
Authority has under Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, has submitted his report of Central Government.
And whereas, the Central Government after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land
is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of the user therein;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central
Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is
hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central
Government hereby directs that the right of user of the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the
170
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Central Government, vests on the date of publication of the declaration, in India Oil Corporation Limited, free from all
encumbrances.
SCHEDULE
District : West Godavari
State : Andhra Pradesh
Name of Mandal
Name of Village
Survey No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Square Metre
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
Jangareddigudem
Nimmalagudem
199
00
00
10
198
00
31
14
254
00
61
85
[F. No. R-11025(11)/252/2017-OR-I/E-21033]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
नई द ली, 11 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 60
60
60
60.— के56ीय सरकार ने पेWोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूिम मH उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन) अिधिनयम,
1962 (1962 का 50) (िजसे इसमH इसके पात उ0 अिधिनयम कहा गया है) क धारा 3 उप धारा (1) के अधीन जारी क गई, भारत
सरकार के पेWोिलयम और ाकृितक गैस मंKालय क अिधसूचना का.आ. 1069(अ) तारीख 03.04.2017 िजसका काशन भारत के
राजपK संsया 947, भाग II, खGड 3, उप खGड (II) तारीख 06.04.2017 मH कया गया है। इस अिधसूचना मH संल अनुसूची मH
िविनzदp आंLदेश राhय के मंडल: देवरापली िजला: वेट गोदावरी क भूिम मH, ओडीशा राhय मH पारादीप से तेलंगाना राhय मH
हैदराबाद तक पेWोिलयम उVपाद% के प!रवहन के िलए इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपरेशन िलिमटेड के ,ारा $याि5वत कए जा रहे “पारादीप-
हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन प!रयोजना” के संबंध मH पाइपलाइन िबछाने के योजन के िलए उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन करने के िलए अपने
आशय क घोषणा क थी:
और उ0 राजपK अिधसूचना क ितयाँ जनता को उपलrध करा दी गई थk। और उ0 अिधिनयम क धारा 6 क उपधारा (1)
के अनुसरण मH सम ािधकारी नH के56ीय सरकार को अपनी !रपोट दे दी है।
और के56ीय सरकार ने उ0 !रपोट पर िवचार करने के पात और यह समाधान हो जाने पर क उ0 भूिम पाइपलाइन
िबछाने के िलए अपेित है, उसमH उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन करने का िविनf चय कया है:
अतः अब, के56ीय सरकार उ0 अिधिनयम क धारा 6 क उपधारा (1) ,ारा द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए एतद् ,ारा
घोषणा करती है क इस अिधसूचना से संल अनुसूिच मH िविनzदp भूिम मH पाइपलाइन िबछाने के उपयोग का अिधकार अNजत कया
जाए:
और के56ीय सरकार उ0 अिधिनयम क धारा 6 क उपधारा (4) ,ारा द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए, यह िनदश देती है
क उ0 भूिम मH उपयोग का अिधकार इस घोषणा के काशन क तारीख से के56ीय सरकार मH िनिहत होने के बजाए सभी िबलंगम% से
मु0 होकर इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपरेशन िलिमटेड मH िनिहत होगा।
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
िजला: वेट गोदावरी राhय: आ5Lदेश
मंडल का नाम
ाम का नाम
सव न बर
ेKफल
हे\टेयर
एयर
वग मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
देवरापली
यदावोलु
153/1
00
02
84
153/2
00
15
33
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
171
156
00
34
71
157
00
08
79
184/4
00
01
39
184/2
00
42
37
173/2
00
45
57
173/3
00
02
95
174
00
17
64
175/2
00
11
66
178
00
06
84
176/2
00
44
48
177/1
00
27
51
107
00
46
42
109
00
01
70
108
00
01
61
119/3
00
02
23
110/2
00
17
94
110/3
00
05
90
119/2
00
00
39
119/1
00
07
02
118/8
00
16
27
118/5B
00
00
41
118/7C
00
07
58
255/2A
00
00
10
255/1D
00
02
03
255/1A
00
02
99
259
00
34
09
258
00
10
25
263
00
28
82
172
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
60
00
03
11
59/1
00
18
63
59/2
00
03
54
59/3
00
03
43
59/4
00
03
87
59/5
00
10
47
475/1
00
12
64
475/3
00
00
34
475/2
00
03
45
476
00
06
78
474/5
00
10
35
474/2
00
03
40
474/3
00
10
76
473
00
10
63
472/3
00
30
80
472/2
00
00
42
487/2
00
16
84
488/1
00
06
08
488/2
00
37
55
489/5
00
18
80
490
00
05
54
717/5
00
00
38
717/4
00
04
88
717/3
00
17
30
717/2
00
05
86
716/1
00
14
29
715
00
09
73
711
00
09
82
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
173
713
00
12
66
712
00
29
98
708
00
27
63
707
00
12
01
706
00
13
58
513/6
00
07
43
513/5
00
08
64
513/4
00
04
53
513/3
00
04
38
513/2
00
08
70
513/1
00
09
71
514
00
00
38
518
00
45
72
519/1
00
18
13
520/1
00
34
99
532/1
00
16
70
532/3
00
12
97
585
00
22
83
586/2
00
16
09
586/1
00
15
12
587/1
00
11
40
587/2
00
16
61
551
00
08
72
555
00
34
66
556/2B
00
03
96
556/2C
00
11
74
556/1
00
15
23
557/3
00
09
90
570
00
36
96
569
00
32
24
568
00
26
38
174
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/252/2017-ओआर-I/ई-21033]
पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 11th January, 2018
S.O. 60.— Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural
Gas, published in the Gazette of India No. 947 Part-II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii) dated 06.04.2017 vide S.O. Number
1069 (E) dated 03.04.2017 issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals pipelines
(Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) the Central
Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land situated in Mandal Devarapalli, District West
Godavari in Andhra Pradesh State, specified in the schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying
pipeline for the transportation of petroleum products from Paradip in the State of Odisha to Hyderabad in the State of
Telangana by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the "Paradip–Hyderabad Pipeline Project".
And whereas the copies of the Gazette were made available to the public. And whereas the Competent
Authority has under Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, has submitted his report of Central Government.
And whereas, the Central Government after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land
is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of the user therein;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central
Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is
hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central
Government hereby directs that the right of user of the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the
Central Government, vests on the date of publication of the declaration, in India Oil Corporation Limited, free from all
encumbrances.
SCHEDULE
District: West Godavari
State : Andhra Pradesh
Name of Mandal
Name of
Village
Survey No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Square Metre
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
Devarapalli
Yadavolu
153/1
00
02
84
153/2
00
15
33
156
00
34
71
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
175
157
00
08
79
184/4
00
01
39
184/2
00
42
37
173/2
00
45
57
173/3
00
02
95
174
00
17
64
175/2
00
11
66
178
00
06
84
176/2
00
44
48
177/1
00
27
51
107
00
46
42
109
00
01
70
108
00
01
61
119/3
00
02
23
110/2
00
17
94
110/3
00
05
90
119/2
00
00
39
119/1
00
07
02
118/8
00
16
27
118/5B
00
00
41
118/7C
00
07
58
255/2A
00
00
10
255/1D
00
02
03
255/1A
00
02
99
176
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
259
00
34
09
258
00
10
25
263
00
28
82
60
00
03
11
59/1
00
18
63
59/2
00
03
54
59/3
00
03
43
59/4
00
03
87
59/5
00
10
47
475/1
00
12
64
475/3
00
00
34
475/2
00
03
45
476
00
06
78
474/5
00
10
35
474/2
00
03
40
474/3
00
10
76
473
00
10
63
472/3
00
30
80
472/2
00
00
42
487/2
00
16
84
488/1
00
06
08
488/2
00
37
55
489/5
00
18
80
490
00
05
54
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
177
717/5
00
00
38
717/4
00
04
88
717/3
00
17
30
717/2
00
05
86
716/1
00
14
29
715
00
09
73
711
00
09
82
713
00
12
66
712
00
29
98
708
00
27
63
707
00
12
01
706
00
13
58
513/6
00
07
43
513/5
00
08
64
513/4
00
04
53
513/3
00
04
38
513/2
00
08
70
513/1
00
09
71
514
00
00
38
518
00
45
72
519/1
00
18
13
520/1
00
34
99
532/1
00
16
70
532/3
00
12
97
178
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
585
00
22
83
586/2
00
16
09
586/1
00
15
12
587/1
00
11
40
587/2
00
16
61
551
00
08
72
555
00
34
66
556/2B
00
03
96
556/2C
00
11
74
556/1
00
15
23
557/3
00
09
90
570
00
36
96
569
00
32
24
568
00
26
38
[F. No. R-11025(11)/252/2017-OR-I/E-21033]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
179
Je ,oa jkstxkj ea=kky;
ubZ fnYyh] 1 tuojh] 2018
dk-vk- 61-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ
vks-,u-th-lh- fyfeVsM ,oa vU; ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa
dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 11@2016) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks
dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 19-12-2017 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&30011@39@2015&vkbZvkj (,e)º
Mh- ds- fgeka'kq] voj lfpo
MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT
New Delhi, the 1st January, 2018
S.O. 61.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 11/2016) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour
Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the
management of M/s. O.N.G.C. Limited and other and their workman, which was received by the Central Government
on 19.12.2017.
[No. L-30011/39/2015-IR (M)]
D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,
Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,
Ahmedabad,
Dated 21st November, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 11/2016
1.
The Executive Director – Asset Manager,
ONGC Ltd., Avani Bhavan, 5th Floor, Chandkheda,
Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
2.
The Incharge (HR - IR),
ONGC Ltd., Avani Bhavan, 5th Floor, Chandkheda,
Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
3.
The Dy. General Manager (P) ST,
ONGC Ltd., Avani Bhavan, 5th Floor, Chandkheda,
Sabarmati, Ahmedabad
4.
M/s D.B. Enterprises,
G-8, Sukan Mall, Behind Vishat Petrol Pump,
Sabarmati, Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
…First Party
V/s
The President,
Glorious Petroleum Mazdoor Sangh,
A/3, PriyaDarshini Society,Near New Railway Colony,
Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380019
…Second Party
For the First Party : Shri K.V. Gadhia
For the Second Party : Shri S.N. Gandhi
180
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No.
L-30011/39/2015-IR(M) dated 07.01.2016 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad
(Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of ONGC Ltd., Ahmedabad through its contractor
M/s D.B. Enterprises, Ahmedabad in discontinuing/terminating the services of two workmen Shri Mangaji J.
Yadav w.e.f. 28.04.2015 without following the procedure prescribed under Section 33 of the I.D. Act, 1947
during the pendency of his claim for regularization in services of ONGC Ltd., before CGIT, Ahmedabad and
Shri Pradipkumar S. Nai without following the procedure prescribed under ‘Fair Wage Settlement’ is legal,
proper and justified? If not, to what relief the concerned workmen S/Shri Mangaji J. Yadav and Pradipkumar
S. Nai are entitled to and what directions are necessary in the matter?”
1.
The reference dates back to 07.01.2016.The second party submitted the statement of claim Ex. 2 on 21.04.2016
alleging that the second party union Glorious Petroleum Mazdoor Sangh is a registered union under the trade union act
and both the concerning workmen namely Mangaji J. Yadav and Pradipkumar S. Nai were the members of the
aforesaid union who were working with the first party ONGC Ltd., hereinafter referred to as ONGC through their
respective contractors since more than 25 years. During the tenure of their services, there was no complaint against
them regarding their work and conduct. They have also worked for more than 240 days in each and every calendar
year. It has been further alleged that at the time of impugned action, they were working with the first party No. 4
M/s D.B. Enterprises, hereinafter referred to as M/s D.B. Enterprises, a labour contractor. It has been further alleged
that as per the policy of ONGC whenever there any contractor is changed, list of the contract workers engaged by the
previous contractor has been provided to the new contractor so that the new contractor be mandated to continue with
the contract workmen of the earlier contractor. It has been further alleged that both the workmen worked for more than
25 years as unskilled and skilled operator workers respectively and lastly they have been working with the contractor
namely M/s D.B. Enterprises. It has been further alleged that a criminal complaint was registered against the aforesaid
workmen by the first party under the wrong and false criminal complaint wherein they have been put under suspension
for 1½ months, later it was revoked by an oral order and the workmen were reinstated in their service with continuity of
service and worked for more than 2½ years till 27.04.2015. Thereafter, suddenly on 28.04.2015, both the concerned
workmen received a letter from M/s D.B. Enterprises informing that they are debarred w.e.f. 28.04.2015 from
performing any duty in ONGC till they are proved innocent by the competent court. The second party union submitted
the copy of the aforesaid letters vide Ex. 11/1 and 11/2. It has been further alleged that on 28.04.2015, workmen were
also terminated from the service without giving them any opportunity to defend themselves. No departmental inquiry
was also conducted. It has been further alleged that the workman Mangaji J. Yadav was a protected workman and his
case was pending for regularisation in CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad. The said contention was admitted by the
first party in their letter dated 28.04.2015 Ex. 11/3 and 22.06.2015 Ex. 11/4 submitted before the Assistant
Commissioner of Labour, Central, Ahmedabad. It has been further alleged that the workman Pradeepkumar Nai was
covered under Fair Wage Settlement Scheme providing job security to the contract workmen as per the provisions of
the aforesaid settlement scheme. It was the pre-condition in the aforesaid settlement scheme for the management to
give full opportunity to defend him and to conduct departmental inquiry into the misconduct of the workman and his
services cannot be terminated unless the misconduct is proved. The copy of the settlement scheme is submitted vide
Ex. 15/4. It has been further alleged that no such opportunity of defending himself and conducting departmental inquiry
was done in the matter. It has been further alleged that while terminating their services, the workmen were not paid any
retrenchment compensation or legal dues. Thus the impugned action was violative of Section 25 F, G and H of the I.D.
Act. It has been further alleged that the workmen were subjected to Criminal Trial vid Criminal Case No. 843/2009
before the Judicial Magistrate first class, Gandhinagar who acquitted them in the said case following the charge of theft
vide judgement dated 10.08.2016. The copy of the judgement is at Ex. 12/1 and 12/2.
2.
The first party ONGC filed their written statement Ex. 10 on 19.12.2016 submitted that both the concerned
workmen were contract workmen and their services were terminated by their contractor w.e.f. 28.04.2015 in an alleged
theft case with a condition that till they are not proved innocent by the competent Magistrate, they will not be
re-engaged. Thus their services were not terminated by ONGC. Therefore, no relief can be granted against the ONGC.
3.
The first party No. 4 M/s D.B. Enterprises were served vide notice date 28.09.2017 but M/s D.B. Enterprises did
not prefer to appear and submit the written statement. Thus the case against M/s D.B. Enterprises proceed ex-parte vide
order dated 28.09.2017. Therefore, the second party who earlier submitted their affidavit Ex. 13 and 14 were taken on
record. ONGC cross-examined them wherein both the workmen admitted that they used to work under a contractor
named M/s D.B. Enterprises and they were not given any appointment letter and were also not served with any
termination letter by ONGC.
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
181
4.
Thus it is a case wherein no relief can be granted to the workmen against the ONGC.
5.
M/s D.B. Enterprises despite service of notice twice vide Ex. 8 on 18.09.2016, thereafter Ex. 16 on 28.09.2017,
did not prefer to submit his written statement or submissions. The documents Ex. 12/1 and 12/2 clearly establishes that
both the workmen were acquitted for the charge of theft and it is noteworthy that it was the preconditions of the
termination letter Ex. 11/1 and 11/2 that the workmen will not be permitted to perform duties in ONGC unless proved
innocent by the Competent Magistrate and as they have been acquitted by the Competent Magistrate and M/s D.B.
Enterprises has refrained to challenge the reference by submitting written statement, thus this reference can be decided
ex-parte against M/s D.B. Enterprises to engage the aforesaid workmen namely Mangaji J. Yadav and Pradipkumar S.
Nai with immediate effect with all their seniority and other non-monetary benefits.
6.
Thus the reference is disposed of accordingly and the first party no. 4 M/s D.B. Enterprises is directed to
engage/employ the workmen namely Mangaji J. Yadav and Pradipkumar S. Nai immediately as and when they report
to duty as per the terms and conditions said earlier.
7.
The award is passed accordingly.
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 1 tuojh] 2018
dk-vk- 62-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ vks-,u-
th-lh- fyfeVsM ,oa vU; ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh;
ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 50@2012) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh;
ljdkj dks 19-12-2017 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&30011@10@2011&vkbZvkj (,e)º
Mh- ds- fgeka'kq] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 1st January, 2018
S.O. 62.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 50/2012) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour
Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the
management of M/s. O.N.G.C. Limited and others and their workman, which was received by the Central Government
on 19.12.2017.
[No. L-30011/10/2011-IR (M)]
D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,
Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,
Ahmedabad,
Dated 06th Decemberr, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 50/2012
1.
The Executive Director,
ONGC Limited,
Ahmedabad Asset, Avani Bhawan,
Chandkheda, Ahmedabad
2.
The Incharge (Security)
ONGC Limited, Avani Bhawan,
Chandkheda, Ahmedabad
3.
The General Manager,
Trig Guard Force Ltd.,
119, Sarjan Tower, Nr. C.G Road,
Chandkheda, Ahmedabad
182
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
4.
M/s. Max Vigil Security Pvt. Ltd.,
42, Astha Avenue, Nr. R.T.O.,
Subhas Bridge Circle, Ahmedabad
…First Party
V/s
Shri C.K. Parmar,
Secretary, Soshit Kamdar Sangh (Gujarat),
521/3372, JayshriLalimaNivas,
Ambika Nagar, Gujarat Housing Board,
Chandkheda, Ahmedabad
…Second Party
For the First Party no’s. 1 & 2
:
Sh. K.V. Gadhia & Sh. M.K. Patel
For the First Party No. 3
:
Absent
For the First Party No. 4
:
Sh. Anil Parikh, Advocate
For the Second Party
:
Sh. C.K. Parmar, Party in Person
AWARD
The Government of India/ Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No.
L- 30011/10/2011-IR(M) dated:14.02.2012 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal Ahmedabad in respect of the matter specified in the schedule.
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the contractor of ONGC Ltd., Ahmedabad M/s. Max Vigil Security Pvt. Ltd. in
terminating the services of Shri C. K. Parmar (Protected under court order) on the behest of ONGC Ltd.,
Ahmedabad and decategorising him from Security Supervisor to Security Guard and changing his service
condition without following due process of law by the management of ONGC Ltd., Ahmedabad is legal and
justified? What relief the workman is entitled to?"
1.
The reference dates back to 14.02.2012. After the reference by the Appropriate Government, the Court issued
notices vide Ex. 2 to the respective parties and in pursuance to the same, parties to the reference appeared before the
Tribunal and filed their pleadings. The second party filed the Statement of Claims Ex. 7. The ONGC has appeared
through its Advocate and filed its Written Statement vide Ex. 8. The First party No. 3 has chosen not to appear and the
First Party No. 4 appeared through advocate and filed Written Statement vide Ex. 12.
2.
The Second party appeared as a party in person and alleged in his Statement of claim that he had been working
with ONGC under various contractors continuously since 1992 and worked as Security Guard with Opp. No. 3 till
30.06.2010. It is further alleged that he had been serving as a Security Supervisor since Feb. – 2006. But he was
decategorised by the F.P. No. 3 without any rhyme or reason w.e.f. 02.06.2010. It is further alleged that he was then
working with F.P. No. 4 and was illegally terminated. It is also alleged that case of regularization of various workers
was pending before the Ld. Tribunal and that he was a Union leader fighting with the F.P. for the rights of other
employees and therefore he was decategoriseddespite Interim Relief granted by tribunal in their favour in the main
Reference and he was subsequently terminated.Thus the second party has prayed for reinstatement on original post with
continuity in service and has also prayed to declare the action of decategorising him from security supervisor to
security guard as illegal and also prayed for granting the benefits of Security Supervisor from June – 2010. He has also
prayed for declaring the action of the ONGC to change his service condition as illegal and unjust and further prayed for
cost of litigation.
3.
The First Party No. 1 & 2 ONGC has filed it Written statement vide Ex. 8 and denied the averments made in the
statement of claims. The ONGC has stated in true facts that there was no relation of master and servant relationship
between the first party and the second party at any point of time. The ONGC has further stated that as per the Statement
of Claims itself, the second party was decategorised by F.P. No. 3 and terminated by F.P. No. 4 and hence prayed for
rejection of reference qua ONGC. The ONGC has further stated that the reference is barred by principle of res-judicata
as the Complaint No. 05/2011 filed by the second party for the same cause of action was dismissed. Hence it is prayed
to reject the reference.
4.
The First party No. 4 has also filed written statement Ex. 12 and denied the contentions raised in the Statement
of Claims. As far as true facts are concerned, it is stated that the second party was working with them and was
suspended on 01.07.2010 for serious misconducts and was also served with a charge sheet on 30.07.2010. It is further
stated that a departmental inquiry was conducted and sufficient opportunity was given to the second party workman
and inquiry officer submitted his report on 01.09.2010 giving finding that the charges were proved. The second party
was then served with a second show cause notice dtd: - 03.09.2010 on the aforesaid inquiry report and on the point of
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
183
punishment but he did not reply to the said notice, therefore, he was dismissed from service w.e.f. 01.10.2010. Thus in
view of the same, the F.P. No. 3 has prayed for rejection of reference.
5.
The Second party examined himself in the matter and was also cross examined by first party no. 1, 2 & 4. The
first party No. 4 has also examined his witness Mr. Santosh Mojiram Sharma in the matter who was cross examined by
second party and all the first parties. The F.P. No. 4 has produced a list of documents including inquiry report. On the
other hand the second party also filed number of documents in the matter. During the course of proceedings, the second
party has also given various applications/affidavits and also brought on record the previous litigation between the
parties and the orders thereof. The Second party and F.P. No. 4 have given written arguments in the matter while the
Ld. Advocate for the F.P. Nos. 1 & 2 have made oral submissions in the matter.
6.
Considering the materials and evidences on record, the submissions of the parties and the terms of reference as
formed by the appropriate government, the issues that fall for consideration are:
I.
Whether the termination of the Second Party by the Contractor M/s. Max Vigil Security Pvt. Ltd. is legal
and justified?
II.
Whether the action of ONGC in decategorising the second party from Security Supervisor to Security
guard is legal and justified?
III.
If not, what relief the second party is entitled to?
6.1
Issue I
The burden of proof of this issues lies on second party, workman. From the terms of reference, the pleadings of
the second party in the statement of claims and thereafter as well as pleadings of the ONGC and the contractor, one
thing that is clear is that the second party was working with the F.P. No. – 4 herein. Hence, there was a relation of
master and servant between the second party and the F.P. No.4. Secondly, the fact that the second party is terminated is
also an admitted fact. What is required to be determined here is whether, the said termination is just and legal. In this
connection, the second party has stated that he was terminated on 01.07.2010 without following the due process of law.
As against this, the witness of F.P. No. 4 Mr. Santosh Mojiram Sharma stated that he was suspended on 01.07.2010 and
terminated on 01.10.2010 after a departmental inquiry. The second party has appeared as a party in person and has not
taken assistance of any legal counsel in the matter. The F.P. No. 4 has also produced the inquiry proceedings on record
to support its case. However, what is borne out from the record is that the F.P. No. 4 has not paid
suspension/subsistence allowance to the second party during the pendency of the inquiry. Moreover, the inquiry was for
most of the time conducted in absence of the second party. The list of witnesses relied upon by the management was
also not provided to the second party. Moreover, the first date of inquiry was kept on 13.08.2010 for which notice was
issued on 09.08.2010. The second party on that day gave an application for change in venue of the proceedings. Now
this Tribunal cannot decide the venue of the proceedings as it is the discretion of the management alone. However,
without deciding the same, the inquiry officer in no time fixed another date of the proceedings at the same place on
18.08.2010. The Second party again did not remain present. On that day, the witnesses of the management were
examined. The proceedings are then postponed to 27.08.2010. The second party again chose not to remain present and
therefore the inquiry proceeding was concluded on the said date. The Inquiry officer has then on 01.09.2010 submitted
inquiry report. Subsequent thereto on 03.09.2010 itself, the management has given a second show cause notice to the
second party and directed him to reply to the same within 72 hours on why he should not be dismissed failing which
management will take proposed action against him. Thus it is clear from the above dates and proceedings that the
inquiry was conducted in a hasty manner and decision of dismissal was also taken in haste. This Tribunal is aware of
the fact that the charges are serious in nature wherein the second party has not only abused a superior but also damaged
Government property and left without any permission or authorization. However, the principles of natural justice
demand that the delinquent be given sufficient opportunity to disprove the charges and prove his innocence. The
management has already framed the charges and communicated the same on 30.07.2010 to the second party. The same
was not replied by the second party and hence inquiry proceedings were initiated. Thus, this Tribunal is of the opinion
that the Second party may be given a chance to reply to the charge sheet and the management may then take a decision
on whether to initiate inquiry or not. If the management decides to initiate the inquiry then the second party may be
given reasonable opportunity to defend himself. The management may provide the list of witnesses and documents that
may be relied upon before hand to the second party and the same is expected from the second party. On conclusion of
the inquiry proceedings, reasonable time may be granted to both the sides to submit their briefs and then again to
counter the findings of the inquiry officer and further notice, if any. In nut shell, the entire process from the point of
reply to the charge sheet is required to be done afresh. Considering the peculiar facts of the case, as well as the fact that
the second party appeared as party-in-person and also considering the fact that the first inquiry was conducted virtually
in ex-parte manner against the second party workman.
184
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
The apex court in Brijbihari Singh V/s Bihar State Financial Corporation, 216(1) CLR 344, held that it is a well
settled principle of law where a person/employee was required to answer charges labeled against him should know not
only the acquisition against him but also the testimony of the witnesses by which the charges were alleged to be
proved. The departure from the aforesaid requirements of principles of law definitely violates the principles of natural
justice and therefore, the inquiry held against the delinquent employee is vitiated.
Thus it will be in fitness of things, if the said exercise is carried out in house as far as the present issue is
concerned. It is needless to clarify here that any order passed will be subject to rights of the parties to challenge it
before the appropriate forum. If the management sticks to its earlier decision, then the question of intervening period
will not be of much consequence. However, if the relief is granted, then the disciplinary authority may modify the
punishment accordingly.
6.2
Issue II
As far as the present issue is concerned, from the statement of claims itself, it is clear that the second party was
earlier working with the F.P. No. 3 and he was decategorised from security supervisor to security guard by the said
party. Moreover, the ONGC has also contended that the second party was never appointed by them. The terms of
reference are that whether the action of the ONGC in decategorising the second party is just and legal or not. However,
from the pleadings of the second party himself, it is clear that he was decategorised by F.P. No. 3 and not ONGC.
Moreover, the Tribunal cannot traverse beyond the terms of reference. Thus no relief can be granted to the second party
against ONGC in the present issue.
7.
In view of the above, the matter is sent back to the Disciplinary Authority to proceed fresh inquiry and pass a
reasoned order after giving full opportunity of hearing to the workman as held by the Hon'ble Apex Court in case of
Brij Bihar Singh Vs. Bihar State financial Corporation & Ors. reported in 2016 I CLR 344.
8.
The F.P. No. 4 will also be required to pay subsistence allowance from the date of commence of fresh
departmental proceedings to till the date of final order if any, to be passed by the F.P. No. 4. Thus the reference is
disposed off with above observations.
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 1 tuojh] 2018
dk-vk- 63-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ vks-,u-
th-lh- fyfeVsM ,oa vU; ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh;
ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 67@2010) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh;
ljdkj dks 19-12-2017 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&30011@8@2009&vkbZvkj (,e)º
Mh- ds- fgeka'kq] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 1st January, 2018
S.O. 63.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 67/2010) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour
Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the
management of M/s. O.N.G.C. Limited and other and their workman, which was received by the Central Government
on 19.12.2017.
[No. L-30011/8/2009-IR (M)]
D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,
Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,
Ahmedabad,
Dated 20th November, 2017
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
185
Reference: (CGITA) No. 67/2010
1.
The Asset Manager,
ONGC Ltd., Ankleshwar Asset,
Ankleshwar (Gujarat)
2.
The Chief Manager (Security),
ONGC Ltd.,
Ankleshwar
3.
M/s Tops Security Ltd.,
C-I, Hariom Shopping, Nr. Overbridge,
Opp. Jublee Guest House, Old National Highway,
Ankleshwar
…First Party
V/s
The General Secretary,
ONG Mazdoor Sangh, ONGC Office,
Ankleshwar (Gujarat)
…Second Party
For the First Party :
Shri C.S. Naidu
For the Second Party :
Shri A.N. Patel
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-30011/8/2009-
IR(M) dated 29.07.2009 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect
of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
“The Security Section of ONGC is a “registered establishment” under the Contract Labour (R&A) Act, 1970
and the Contractor had obtained prescribed Labour License under the Act. Hence the dispute raised is not
maintainable.”
1.
The reference dates back to 29.07.2009. The second party submitted the statement of claim Ex. 8 on 03.04.2010
and the first party submitted the written statement Ex. 16 on 21.04.2010 along with vakalatpatra Ex. 17 of his advocate.
2.
Since then the second party union did not lead evidence; however on 05.11.2015, The General Secretary,
R.H. Pathan ONG Mazdoor Sangh moved an application Ex. 33 for withdrawal from the reference of 165 workmen
named in the application.
3.
Since then the second party union has been absent and has not been leading evidence.
4.
Thus it appears that the second party union is not willing to prosecute and pursue the matter. Thus the reference
is disposed of in the absence of the evidence of the second party workman.
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 1 tuojh] 2018
dk-vk- 64-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ VkVk
dsfedYl fyfeVsM ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 101@2010) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks
19-12-2017 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&29012@82@2008&vkbZvkj (,e)º
Mh- ds- fgeka'kq] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 1st January, 2018
S.O. 64.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 101/2010) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour
Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the
management of M/s. Tata Chemicals Limited and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on
19.12.2017.
[No. L-29012/82/2008-IR (M)]
D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
186
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,
Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,
Ahmedabad,
Dated 23rd November, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 101/2010
The Manager,
Tata Chemicals Limited,
Ranavav Quarry Office, Ranavav,
Porbandar (Gujarat)
…First Party
V/s
Shri Laxman Devshi Bhuva,
Navapara, Adityana,
Ranavav,
Porbandar (Gujarat)
…Second Party
For the First Party : Shri P.S. Gogia
For the Second Party : Shri Ramsingh Thakor
AWARD
The
Government
of
India/Ministry
of
Labour,
New
Delhi
by
reference
adjudication
Order
No.
L-29012/82/2008-IR(M) dated 16.09.2008 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad
(Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the Manager (Mines)/Mine Agent of M/s Tata Chemicals Limited, Ranavav in not
providing employment to Shri Laxman Devshi Bhuva, Ex-workman after 01.10.2006 and whether his
termination is legal and justified? What relief the workman is entitled to?”
1.
The reference dates back to 16.09.2008. Both the parties submitted and exchanged their statement of claim and
written statement along with relevant documents. The reference was fixed for evidence of the second party but today on
23.11.2017, both the parties jointly submitted a settlement Ex. 15 stating that the first party has agreed to pay
Rs.1278000/- to the workman subject to deduction of taxes. It has also been said that the payment has been made to the
workman. The settlement was read over to the parties and the parties verified the settlement of the award.
2.
Thus the reference is finally disposed of in terms of the settlement Ex. 15. The settlement Ex. 15 shall be part of
the award.
3.
The award is passed accordingly.
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 1 tuojh] 2018
dk-vk- 65-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ VkVk
dsfedYl fyfeVsM ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 105@2010) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks
19-12-2017 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&29012@81@2008&vkbZvkj (,e)º
Mh- ds- fgeka'kq] voj lfpo
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
187
New Delhi, the 1st January, 2018
S.O. 65.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 105/2010) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour
Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the
management of M/s. Tata Chemicals Limited and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on
19.12.2017.
[No. L-29012/81/2008-IR (M)]
D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,
Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,
Ahmedabad,
Dated 23rd November, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 105/2010
The Manager,
Tata Chemicals Limited,
Ranavav Quarry Office, Ranavav,
Porbandar (Gujarat)
…First Party
V/s
Shri Mohan Kana Borichiya,
Ganesh Oil Centre, Opp. Post Office Station Plot,
Ranavav -2,
Porbandar (Gujarat)
…Second Party
For the First Party : Shri P.S. Gogia
For the Second Party : Shri RamsinghThakor
AWARD
The
Government
of
India/Ministry
of
Labour,
New
Delhi
by
reference
adjudication
Order
No. L-29012/81/2008-IR(M) dated 16.09.2008 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal,
Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the Manager (Mines)/Mine Agent of M/s Tata Chemicals Limited, Ranavav in not
providing employment to Shri Mohan Kana Borichiya, Ex-workman after 01.10.2006 and whether his
termination is legal and justified? What relief the workman is entitled to?”
1.
The reference dates back to 16.09.2008. Both the parties submitted and exchanged their statement of claim and
written statement along with relevant documents. The reference was fixed for evidence of the second party but today on
23.11.2017, both the parties jointly submitted a settlement Ex. 16 stating that the first party has agreed to pay
Rs.1278000/- to the workman subject to deduction of taxes. It has also been said that the payment has been made to the
workman. The settlement was read over to the parties and the parties verified the settlement of the award.
2.
Thus the reference is finally disposed of in terms of the settlement Ex. 16. The settlement Ex. 16 shall be part of
the award.
3.
The award is passed accordingly.
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 1 tuojh] 2018
dk-vk- 66-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ VkVk
dsfedYl fyfeVsM ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
188
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 113@2010) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks
19-12-2017 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&29012@80@2008&vkbZvkj (,e)º
Mh- ds- fgeka'kq] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 1st January, 2018
S.O. 66.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 113/2010) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour
Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the
management of M/s. Tata Chemicals Limited and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on
19.12.2017.
[No. L-29012/80/2008-IR (M)]
D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,
Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,
Ahmedabad,
Dated 23rd November, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 113/2010
The Manager,
Tata Chemicals Limited,
Ranavav Quarry Office, Ranavav,
Porbandar (Gujarat)
…First Party
V/s
Shri Ali Suleman Ghavda,
Behind Patel Samaj,
Adityana,Ranavav,
Porbandar (Gujarat)
…Second Party
For the First Party : Shri P.S. Gogia
For the Second Party : Shri Ramsingh Thakor
AWARD
The
Government
of
India/Ministry
of
Labour,
New
Delhi
by
reference
adjudication
Order
No. L-29012/80/2008-IR(M) dated 16.09.2008 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal,
Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the Manager (Mines)/Mine Agent of M/s Tata Chemicals Limited, Ranavav in not
providing employment to Shri Ali Suleman Ghavda, Ex-workman after 01.10.2006 and whether his
termination is legal and justified? What relief the workman is entitled to?”
1.
The reference dates back to 16.09.2008. Both the parties submitted and exchanged their statement of claim and
written statement along with relevant documents. The reference was fixed for evidence of the second party but today on
23.11.2017, both the parties jointly submitted a settlement Ex. 16 stating that the first party has agreed to pay
Rs.1278000/- to the workman subject to deduction of taxes. It has also been said that the payment has been made to the
workman. The settlement was read over to the parties and the parties verified the settlement of the award.
2.
Thus the reference is finally disposed of in terms of the settlement Ex. 16. The settlement Ex. 16 shall be part of
the award.
3.
The award is passed accordingly.
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
189
ubZ fnYyh] 1 tuojh] 2018
dk-vk- 67-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ
Mh-ch-lh- lUl (xqtjkr) izkbosV fyfeVsM ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd
fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 531@2004) dks çdkf'kr djrh
gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 19-12-2017 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&37011@17@2002&vkbZvkj (,e)º
Mh- ds- fgeka'kq] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 1st January, 2018
S.O. 67.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 531/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour
Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the
management of M/s. D.B.C. Sons (Guj.) Pvt. Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government
on 19.12.2017.
[No. L-37011/17/2002-IR (M)]
D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,
Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,
Ahmedabad,
Dated 21st November, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 531/2004
The Managing Director,
M/s Darabshaw B. Cursetjee Sons (Bom) Pvt. Ltd.,
Darabshaw House, Ballard Pier,
Mumbai – 400010
…First Party
V/s
Shri N.K. Sharma,
S.D.X. – 50, Kutch,
Gandhidham (Gujarat) – 370201
…Second Party
For the First Party : Shri L.M. Patil
For the Second Party : Shri D.C. Gandhi
AWARD
The
Government
of
India/Ministry
of
Labour,
New
Delhi
by
reference
adjudication
Order
No. L-37011/17/2002-IR(M) dated 10.12.2002 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal,
Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of M/s D.B.C’s Sons (Guj.) Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai not to allow on duty
after transfer either at Kakinada or at Kandla presuming that he was left the service on his own is justified or
legal? If not, what relief the workman is entitled for and since when?”
190
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1.
The reference dates back to 10.12.2002. After issuing notice to both the parties, neither of the parties appeared,
therefore, Industrial Tribunal, Gujarat vide order dated 10.01.2005 dismissed the reference for non-appearance of the
parties.
2.
Thereafter, the second party workman moved a Misc. Application No. 07/2009 after a period of 2 years for
restoration of the reference and the Industrial Tribunal, Gujarat restored the reference to its original no. for adjudication
and issued the notice to the first party which was received by the first party on 13.09.2012.
3.
The second party workman submitted the statement of claim Ex. 13 on 23.08.2012 alleging that he was
appointed as a temporary employee on the post of Dock Assistant by the first party The Managing Director,
M/s Darabshaw B. Cursetjee Sons (Bom) Pvt. Ltd., Darabshaw House, Ballard Pier, Mumbai, hereinafter referred to as
first party vide order dated 30.04.1985 for a period of 6 months’ probation w.e.f. 01.05.1985 with a monthly salary of
Rs.450/- and he was made permanent vide order dated 29.03.1986 w.e.f. 01.04.1986 with a total salary of Rs.5500/- in
the grade of permanent service. He served his duties with honesty and diligence at first party office as Gandhidham.
During his whole service, he was not showed any show-cause notice, memo, rebuke or charge-sheet. On account of his
good and honest service, he was giving 3 special increments with a commendation certificate. Suddenly on 21.06.2001,
he was transferred Gandhidham Gujarat to Kakinada Andhra Pradesh. He apprised the first party by way of serving a
letter regarding his financial, social conditions and also problems of minor child and wife’s illness being suffering with
kidney ailment but the first party did not consider his case of change of transfer, therefore, he booked a railway ticket
on 08.08.2001 to be present at Kakinada. After reaching Kakinada, he was not permitted to join, so he informed the
Labour Commissioner at Kakinada regarding this but those officers did not take cognizance into the matter. He was not
subjected to any departmental inquiry and suddenly his services were terminated for not joining at the transfer place.
While terminating his services, he was not given any show-cause notice, retrenchment compensation. Thus the action
was violative of the provisions of Section 25 F, G and H of the I.D. Act. Thus he has prayed for declaring the
termination order as illegal, reinstatement of service along with service benefits with legal expenses of Rs. 10000/-.
4.
The first party in his written statement Ex. 15 filed on 18.10.2012 admitted the service appointment of second
party workman on probation, thereafter, as a permanent employee but further submitted that the first party did not
terminate the services of the second party workman and as per the transfer orders issued by the first party; he was
transferred from Gandhidham to Kakinada. He reported to duty at transferred place and thereafter, all of a sudden, he
refused to work at the transferred place and started to send representations mentioning seek reports and his wife’s
ailment. He has also submitted that this tribunal has no jurisdiction to entertain the reference on the ground that the
initial appointment letter as a probationer as well as a permanent employee issued to the workman clearly indicated that
transfer will be the condition of his service and after making his transfer to Kakinada, the workman admitted that he
resume duty at Kakinada and thereafter, he stopped working there. Thus the jurisdiction lies in the Central Government
Industrial Tribunal situated in Andhra Pradesh. It has been further submitted that the entire reference is misconceived,
legally not tenable as transferring a workman/employee which was a service condition in the appointment letter, cannot
also be entertained as an Industrial Dispute.
5.
On the basis of the pleadings, the following issues arise:
i.
Whether the action of the management of M/s D.B.C’s Sons (Guj.) Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai not to allow on
duty after transfer either at Kakinada or at Kandla presuming that he was left the service on his own is
justified or legal?
ii.
To what relief, if any, the workman is entitled for and since when?
6.
As both the issues are interconnected, therefore both these issues are discussed and decided together.
7.
Issue no. (i & ii): The burden to prove this issue was lying on the second party workman and the second party
workman in his affidavit Ex. 16 filed on 28.11.2013 and in his cross-examination, he has admitted that his date of birth
is 17.12.1949 with a matric qualification and also admitted that he was transferred to Kakinada vide order dated
20.06.2001, he reached Kakinada after staying for 10 to 15 days at Gandhidham requesting for cancellation of transfer.
He further admitted in his cross-examination that he stayed in Kakinada for a month and came back to Gandhidham.
Thereafter, he did not turn up at Kakinada.
8.
The first party examined Baltazar Fernandez, Senior Manager, vide affidavit Ex. 19 who reiterated the
averments made in the written statement and stated in his cross-examination which is as under:
“I have been working as Senior Manager, Finance and Accounts since last 25 years. I am aware of all the facts
relating to this case. The workman N.K. Sharma has been a regular employee of first party. The workman was
Dock Assistant in the first party organisation. We used to transfer the workman from one branch to another
branch of the organisation. Our office is based at Kandla Port. It is true that since joining the workman
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
191
continued his service at Kandla Port Branch of first party organisation. The workman was transferred on
21.06.2001 from Kandla Branch to Kakinada Branch of the first party organisation. He was relieved with
immediate effect.
The workman moved a representation for cancellation of his transfer order on the ground that his wife was well
and long sick. The representation was annexed with the medical certificate regarding Kidney disease.
The workman despite representation for cancellation of transfer, joined at Kakinada on 08.08.2001. But we did
not permit him to join and also did not initiate any disciplinary proceeding against the workman for not joining
with in time provided in the transfer order.
No action was taken against the officer who has not permitted the workman to join at Kakinada despite the fact
that the workman’s wife was suffering with Kidney disease.
It is true that the workman moved number of complaints to Collector of the District and other higher authorities
regarding denying him to join at Kakinada. It is true that the workman is stayed at Kakinada for 15 days but
even then he was not permitted to join. No termination order was served on him. No notice or notice pay was
given to the workman. The superannuation age in the first party organisation is 58 years, till date no service or
legal dues are paid to him.”
9.
From the evidence of both the parties, it can be concluded that the service of the workman was transferrable and
he was transferred as per the terms and condition of the service despite the admitted fact that his wife was suffering
with renal ailment. Workman joined at Kakinada, therefore, it cannot be disputed that the jurisdiction in this dispute
was lying in the State of Andhra Pradesh, therefore, in the Central Government Industrial Tribunal situated in the state
of Andhra Pradesh. But the case of the workman appears to be inhumane on the part of the first party that despite the
renal ailment of the workman’s wife, he was deliberately transferred to Kakinada which is against the labour practice
and inhumane. Thus transferred made out of a vengeance can be said to be an Industrial Dispute which existed at
Gandhidham in Gujarat. It is also noteworthy that the first party witness has admitted that no legal dues or benefits
have been paid to him.
10.
Therefore, in the light of the aforesaid discussions, it can be said that the jurisdiction lies at both the places that
is Gandhidham as well as Kakinada because the workman was transferred out of vengeance without considering the
real ailment of the workman’s wife but as admitted by the workman that he was born on 17.12.1949, therefore, passed
the superannuation age, therefore, he cannot be ordered to be reinstated and he can also not be paid arrears of wages for
the period of absence on the principle of ‘no work no pay’.
11.
Thus both the issues (i & ii) are decided with a direction that the second party workman shall be paid a lump-
sum of Rs. 40000/- as compensation along with Rs. 10000/- as legal expenses.
12.
The award is passed accordingly.
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 1 tuojh] 2018
dk-vk- 68-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ vks-,u-
th-lh- fyfeVsM ,oa vU; ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh;
ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 734@2004) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh;
ljdkj dks 19-12-2017 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&30011@67@2001&vkbZvkj (,e)º
Mh- ds- fgeka'kq] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 1st January, 2018
S.O. 68.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 734/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour
Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the
management of M/s. O.N.G.C. Limited and other and their workman, which was received by the Central Government
on 19.12.2017.
[No. L-30011/67/2001-IR (M)]
D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
192
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,
Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,
Ahmedabad,
Dated 28th November, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 734/2004
1.
The Group General Manager (Project),
ONGC Ltd., Ankleshwar Project,
Ankleshwar (Gujarat) – 393010
2.
M/s Yasodeep and Company,
F-32, Raviraj Complex, Nr. Valia Chokdi,
Bharuch (Gujarat) – 393010
…First Party
V/s
The General Secretary,
ONG Mazdoor Sangh C/o Bhartiya Mazdoor Sangh,
Nr. Asian Paint Chokdi, GIDC,
Ankleshwar (Gujarat)
…Second Party
For the First Party : Shri C.S. Naidu
For the Second Party : Shri Amrish Patel
AWARD
The
Government
of
India/Ministry
of
Labour,
New
Delhi
by
reference
adjudication
Order
No. L-30011/67/2001-IR(M) dated 04.07.2001 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal,
Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the demand of the union to absorb/regularize the services of Shri Raj Yogendra Sinh Balwant Sinh
& 13 others as permanent and direct employee of ONGC Ltd., Ankleshwar from the date of their entry in the
service as contractual workmen and all other benefits as enjoyed as the regular employees of the ONGC Ltd.,
is legal, proper and justified? If so, to what relief the concerned workmen are entitled to and from which date
and what other directions are necessary in the matter?”
1.
The reference dates back to 04.07.2001. The second party submitted the statement of claim Ex. 7 on 15.02.2002
and the first party submitted the written statement Ex. 14 on 05.05.2002. The workmen namely Mohd Rafik Hussain
Shaikh and Mohd Rafik Bdul Karim Shaikh vide Ex. 53 on 11.01.2016 and the workmen namely Raj Yogendrasinh
Balvantsinh, Patel Narsangbhai Bhikhabhai, Chasatiya Sandipsinh Prabhatsinh and Vasava Naginbhai Parsottambhai
vide Ex. 55 on 30.06.2016, requested to withdraw from the reference by deleting their names. The said applications
were allowed. Since then the remaining workmen or the union has been absent and have not been leading evidence.
Thus it appears that the remaining workmen or the union are not willing to prosecute the reference.
2.
Thus the reference in the absence of the evidence of the second party, is disposed of with the observation as
under: “the demand of the union to absorb/regularize the services of remaining 8 workmen as permanent and direct
employee of ONGC Ltd., Ankleshwar from the date of their entry in the service as contractual workmen and all other
benefits as enjoyed as the regular employees of the ONGC Ltd., is illegal, improper and unjustified.’’
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 1 tuojh] 2018
dk-vk- 69-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ vks-,u-
th-lh- fyfeVsM ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
193
vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 767@2004) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks
19-12-2017 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&30011@57@2001&vkbZvkj (,e)º
Mh- ds- fgeka'kq] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 1st January, 2018
S.O. 69.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 767/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour
Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the
management of M/s. O.N.G.C. Limited and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on
19.12.2017.
[No. L-30011/57/2001-IR (M)]
D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,
Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,
Ahmedabad,
Dated 28th November, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 767/2004
The Group General Manager (Project),
ONGC Ltd., Ankleshwar Project,
Ankleshwar(Gujarat) – 393010
…First Party
V/s
The President,
All Gujarat State Kamdar Union,
Khadki Faliya, At Vav, Post Kadodara, Taluka Vagra,
Bharuch (Gujarat)
…Second Party
For the First Party : Shri C.S. Naidu
For the Second Party : Shri Amrish Patel
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No.
L-30011/57/2001-IR(M) dated 13.11.2001 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad
(Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of ONGC Ltd., Ankleshwar Project, Ankleshwar in not considering
the demand of Shri Gohil Bharatbhai G. and 30 other workmen for absorption and regularisation is justified? If
not, to what relief the concerned workman is entitled?”
1.
The reference dates back to 13.11.2001.The second party submitted the statement of claim Ex. 5 on 21.04.2004
and the first party submitted the written statement Ex. 17 on 03.10.2017. The workmen namely Rameshbhai
Bheemsang Patel, Chatrsangbhai Ranchodbhai Patel, Fuljibhai Bahecharbhai Limbachia, Ganpat MahijiJadav,
Ashokbhai N. Solanki and Gohil Vinubhai Ranchhodbhai, vide Ex. 9 on 28.03.2016, the workman Suleman Umerji
Patel vide Ex. 12 on 21.06.2016 and the workman Ismail Vali Patel vide Ex. 15 on 29.06.2016, requested to withdraw
from the reference by deleting their names. The said applications were allowed. Since then the remaining workmen or
the union has been absent and have not been leading evidence. Thus it appears that the remaining workmen or the
union are not willing to prosecute the reference.
194
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2.
Thus the reference in the absence of the evidence of the second party, is disposed of with the observation as
under: “the action of the management of ONGC Ltd., Ankleshwar Project, Ankleshwar in not considering the demand
of Shri Gohil Bharatbhai G. and remaining 22 other workmen for absorption and regularisation is justified.”
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 1 tuojh] 2018
dk-vk- 70-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ xqtjkr
vEcqtk lhesaV fyfeVsM ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh;
ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 1004@2004) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh;
ljdkj dks 19-12-2017 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&29012@51@1994&vkbZvkj (,e)º
Mh- ds- fgeka'kq] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 1st January, 2018
S.O. 70.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 1004/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour
Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the
management of M/s. Gujarat Ambuja Cement Limited and their workman, which was received by the Central
Government on 19.12.2017.
[No. L-29012/51/1994-IR (M)]
D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,
Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,
Ahmedabad,
Dated 21st November, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 1004/2004
The Dy. Manager (Personnel),
M/s Gujarat Ambuja Cements Ltd.,
Ambujanagar, P.O. Kodinar,
Amreli – 362720
…First Party
V/s
Shri B.N. Khan,
C/o Bhartiya Mazdoor Sangh,
Gayatri Rajaputpara Main Road,
Lodhwad Police Station,
Rajkot (Gujarat) -360001
…Second Party
For the First Party
:
Shri A.S. Parikh
For the Second Party
:
None
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-29012/51/94-
IR(M) dated 27.03.1996 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect
of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of M/s Gujarat Ambuja Cements Ltd. in terminating the services of
Shri B.N. Khan is justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled?”
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
195
1.
The reference dates back to 27.03.1996. The second party submitted the statement of claim Ex. 4 on 15.02.1997
and the first party submitted the written statement Ex. 5 on 08.12.1997. Since then the second party has not leading
evidence, therefore, on 21.03.2011, fresh notice was issued to both the parties to lead evidence but the second party
neither appeared nor lead his evidence, however, the advocate of the second party appeared and submitted the
vakalatpatra Ex. 13 on 27.01.2012.
2.
Thus it appears that the second party workman is not willing to prosecute and pursue the matter.
3.
Thus the reference is disposed of in the absence of the evidence of the second party workman with the
observation as under: ‘‘the action of the management of M/s Gujarat Ambuja Cements Ltd. in terminating the services
of Shri B.N. Khan is justified.”
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 1 tuojh] 2018
dk-vk- 71-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ xqtjkr
lh/h lhesUV fyfeVsM ,oa vU; ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa
dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 1134@2004) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks
dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 19-12-2017 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&29011@9@1998&vkbZvkj (,e)º
Mh- ds- fgeka'kq] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 1st January, 2018
S.O. 71.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 1134/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour
Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the
management of M/s. Gujarat Sidhee Cement Ltd. and others and their workman, which was received by the Central
Government on 19.12.2017.
[No. L-29011/9/1998-IR (M)]
D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,
Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,
Ahmedabad,
Dated 30th November, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 1134/2004
1.
The Director (Works),
Gujarat Sidhee Cements Ltd.,
Veraval Kodinar Highway, Sidheegram, Veraval,
Junagadh (Gujarat) – 362276
2.
M/s Kavita Constructions Pvt. Ltd.,
Deevanodi Naharmagra,Udaipur
3.
M/s A.M. Enterprises,
C/o Gujarat Sidhee Cements Ltd.,
Sidhi Gram, Junagadh (Gujarat)
…First Party
196
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
V/s
The Secretary,
Shree Junagadh Jilla Mazdoor Sangh,
Ridhi Sidhi Apartment, Office No. 6/7, 2nd Floor,
Veraval (Gujarat)
…Second Party
For the First Party
:
Shri P.S. Gogia
For the Second Party
:
Shri L.M. Patil
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-29011/9/98-
IR(M) dated 29.06.1998 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect
of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of M/s Gujarat Sidhee Cements Ltd., and Contractor M/s A.M.
Enterprises in terminating the service of 104 employees working in packing plant w.e.f. 12.12.1997 is
justified? If not, to what relief these workmen are entitled to?”
1.
The reference dates back to 29.06.1998. Both the parties submitted their statement of claim and written
statement as the case may be. But on 30.11.2017, both the parties submitted the settlement Ex. 23 for withdrawing the
reference unconditionally.
2.
Thus the reference is disposed of as withdrawn.
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
नई द ली, 3 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 72
72
72
72.—केीय सरकार, कमचारी राय बीमा अिधिनयम, 1948 (1948 का 34) क धारा 91-क के साथ पठत धारा
88 ारा द! शि#य$ का योग करते 'ए एत)ारा िभलाई * टील , लांट, सेल के कारखान$/*थापना0 के िनयिमत कमचारय$ को इस
अिधिनयम के वतन से छूट दान करती है। यह छूट, यह अिधसूचना जारी होने क तारीख से एक वष क अविध के िलए लागू रहेगी ।
2.
उ# छूट िन;िलिखत शत< के अधीन है; अथात्:-
(1) पूव># *थापना िजसम? कमचारी िनयोिजत ह@, एक रिज*टर रखेगी, िजसम? छूट ाA कमचारय$ के नाम और पदनाम
दखाये जाय?गे;
(2)
इस छूट के होते 'ए भी, कमचारी उ# अिधिनयम के अधीन ऐसी सुिवधाएं ाA करते रह?गे िजनको पाने के िलए वे इस
अिधसूचना ारा दी गई छूट के वृ! होने क तारीख से पूव संद! अंशदान$ के आधार पर हकदार हो जाते ह@;
(3)
छूट ाA अविध के िलए, यद कोई अिभदाय पहले ही कए जा चुके ह$, तो वे वापस नहH कए जाएंगे;
(4)
उ# कारखाने/*थापना का िनयोजक उस अविध क बाबत िजसके दौरान उस कारखाने/*थापना पर उ# अिधिनयम
(िजसे इसम? इसके पJात् उ# अविध कहा गया है) वतमान था ऐसी िववरिणयां, ऐसे ाMप म? और ऐसी िविशिNय$
सिहत देगा जो कमचारी राय बीमा (साधारण) िविनयम, 1950 के अधीन उसे उ# अविध क बाबत देनी अपेिOत
होती थH;
(5)
िनगम ारा उ# कमचारी राय बीमा अिधिनयम क धारा 45 क उप-धारा (1) के अधीन िनयु# कया गया कोई
िनरीOक या िनगम का इस िनिम! ािधकृत कोई अय पदधारी;
(i) धारा 44 क उप-धारा (1) के अधीन, उ# अविध क बाबत दी गई कसी िववरण क िविशNय$ को सPयािपत
करने के योजनाथ; अथवा
(ii) यह अिभिनिJत करने के योजनाथ क कमचारी राय बीमा (साधारण) िविनयम, 1950 ारा यथाअपेिOत
रिज*टर और अिभलेख उ# अविध के िलए रखे गये थे या नहH; या
(iii) यह अिभिनिJत करने के योजनाथ क कमचारी, िनयोजक ारा दये गए उन फायद$ को, िजसके फल*वMप इस
अिधसूचना के अधीन छूट दी जा रही है, नकद म? और व*तु Mप म? पाने का हकदार बना 'आ है या नहH; या
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
197
(iv) यह अिभिनिJत करने के योजनाथ क उस अविध के दौरान, जब उ# कारखाने के संबंध म? अिधिनयम के उपबंध
वृ! थे, ऐसे कहH उपबंध$ का अनुपालन कया गया था या नहH, िन;िलिखत काय करने के िलए सश# होगा:-
(क) धान या आसR िनयोजक से अपेOा करना क वह उसे ऐसी जानकारी दे िजसे उपरो# िनरीOक या अय
पदधारी आवSयक समझता है ; अथवा
(ख) ऐसे धान या आसR िनयोजक के अिधभोगाधीन, कसी कारखाने, *थापना, कायालय या अय परसर म?
कसी भी उिचत समय पर वेश करना और उसके भारी से यह अपेOा करना क वह Uि#य$ के
िनयोजन और मजदूरी के संदाय से संबंिधत ऐसे लेखा, बिहयां और अय द*तावेज, ऐसे िनरीOक या अय
पदधारी के समO *तुत कर? और उनक परीOा करने द? या ऐसी जानकारी द? िजसे वे आवSयक समझते ह@;
या
(ग)
धान या आसR िनयोजक क, उसके अिभकता या सेवक क, या ऐसे कसी Uि# को, जो ऐसे कारखाने,
*थापना, कायालय या अय परसर म? पाया जाए, यह िवVास करने का युि#यु# कारण है क वह
कमचारी है, परीOा करना; या
(घ)
ऐसे कारखाने, *थापना, कायालय या अय परसर म? रखे गए कसी रिज*टर, लेखा, बही या अय
द*तावेज क नकल तैयार करना या उWरण लेना;
(ङ)
यथािनधारत अय शि#य$ का योग करना ।
(6)
िविनवेश/िनगमीकरण के मामले म?, द! छूट *वत: रX हो जाएगी और तब नए ितYान को छूट हेतु समुिचत सरकार
क अनुमित लेनी होगी।
[सं. एस-38014/07/2013-एस.एस.-I]
एस. के. Zसंह, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 3rd January, 2018
S.O. 72.—In exercise of the power conferred by Section 88 read with Section 91-A of the Employees’ State
Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948) the Central Government hereby exempts the regular employees/trainees of
factories/establishments of Bhilai Steel Plant of SAIL from the operation of the said Act. The exemption shall be
effective for a period of one year from the date of issue of notification.
2.
The above exemption is subject to the following conditions namely:-
(1)
The aforesaid establishments wherein the employees are employed shall maintain a register showing the
name and designations of the exempted employees’;
(2)
Notwithstanding this exemption, the employees shall continue to receive such benefits under the said Act
to which they might have become entitled to on the basis of the contributions paid prior to the date from
which exemption granted by this notification operates;
(3)
The contributions for the exempted period, if already paid, shall not be refundable;
(4)
The employer of the said factory/establishment shall submit in respect of the period during which that
factory was subject to the operation of the said Act (hereinafter referred as the said period), such returns
in such forms and containing such particulars as were due from it in respect of the said period under the
Employees’ State Insurance (General) Regulations, 1950;
(5)
Any Social Security Officer appointed by the Corporation under Sub-Section (1) of Section 45 of the said
ESI Act or other official of the Corporation authorized in this behalf by it, shall, for the purpose of :-
(i)
Verifying the particulars contained in any returned submitted under sub-section (1) of section 44
for the said period; or
(ii)
Ascertaining whether registers and records were maintained as required by the Employees’ State
Insurance (General) Regulations, 1950 for the said period; or
(iii)
Ascertaining whether the employees continue to be entitled to benefits provided by the employer
in cash and kind being benefits in consideration of which exemption is being granted under this
notification; or
198
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(iv)
Ascertaining whether any of the provisions of the Act had been complied with during the period
when such provisions were in force in relation to the said factory to be empowered to:
(a) require the principal or immediate employer to him such information as he may consider
necessary for the purpose of this Act; or
(b) at any reasonable time enter any factory, establishment, office or other premises occupied by
such principal or immediate employer at any reasonable time and require any person found
in charge thereof to produce to such inspector or other official and allow him to examine
accounts, books and other documents relating to the employment of personal and payment of
wages or to furnish to him such information as he may consider necessary; or
(c) examine the principal or immediate employer, his agent or servant, or any person found in
such factory, establishment, office or other premises or any person whom the said inspector
or other official has reasonable cause to believe to have been an employee ; or
(d) make copies of or take extracts from any register, account book or other document
maintained in such factory, establishment, office or other premises,
(e) exercise such other powers as may be prescribed.
(6)
In case of disinvestment/corporatization, the exemption granted shall become automatically cancelled
and then the new entity will have to approach the appropriate Government for exemption.
[No. S-38014/07/2013-SS-I]
S. K. SINGH, Under Secy.
ubZ fnYyh] 3 tuojh] 2018
dk-vk- 73-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj dkaMyk iksVZ
VªLV ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn (xqtjkr) ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 121@2010) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks
03-01-2018 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&37011@13@2008&vkbZvkj (ch&II)º
jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 3rd January, 2018
S.O. 73.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 121/2010) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of
Kandla Port Trust and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 03.01.2018.
[No. L-37011/13/2008-IR (B-II)]
RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,
Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,
Ahmedabad,
Dated 07th December, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 121/2010
The Chairman,
Kandla Port Trust,
P.O. Box No. 50,
Gandhidham, Kutch (Gujarat)
…First Party
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
199
V/s
The General Secretary,
Transport & Dock Workers Union,
Kandla, 21, Yogesh Building, Plot No. 586,
12-C, Gandhidham,
Kutch (Gujarat)
…Second Party
For the First Party
:
Shri K.V. Gadhia
For the Second Party
:
None
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No.
L-37011/13/2008-IR(B-II) dated 25.03.2009 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal,
Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the chairman, Kandla Port Trust, P.O. Box No. 50, Gandhidham, Kutch in not
providing higher grade salary to Shri Sajan Karvadira, Parmar Sandeep, Smt. Sunita Punjwani, Junior
Engineer Civil Gr. I w.e.f. 01.08.2007 to 09.09.2007 is legal and justified? What relief the concerned workmen
is entitled to?”
1.
The reference dates back to 25.03.2009.Despite service of notice to both the party, the second party does not
prefer to submit the statement of claim despite giving dozen of opportunities. The reference is approximately 9 years
old and the first party filed the vakalatpatra of his advocate. The second party advocate failed to explain as to why the
statement of claim has not been filed. Thus it appears that the second party is not willing to prosecute the reference.
2.
Thus the reference is disposed of in the absence of the statement of claim of the second party with the
observation as under: ‘‘the action of the chairman, Kandla Port Trust, P.O. Box No. 50, Gandhidham, Kutch in not
providing higher grade salary to Shri Sajan Karvadira, Parmar Sandeep, Smt. Sunita Punjwani, Junior Engineer Civil
Gr. I w.e.f. 01.08.2007 to 09.09.2007 is legal and justified.”
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 3 tuojh] 2018
dk-vk- 74-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj dkaMyk iksVZ
VªLV ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn (xqtjkr) ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 128@2010) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks
03-01-2018 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&37011@6@2009&vkbZvkj (ch&II)º
jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 3rd January, 2018
S.O. 74.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 128/2010) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of
Kandla Port Trust and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 03.01.2018.
[No. L-37011/6/2009-IR (B-II)]
RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,
Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,
Ahmedabad,
Dated 07th December, 2017
200
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Reference: (CGITA) No. 128/2010
The Chairman,
Kandla Port Trust,
P.O. Box No. 50,
Gandhidham, Kutch (Gujarat)
…First Party
V/s
The General Secretary,
Transport & Dock Workers Union,
Kandla, 21, Yogesh Building, Plot No. 586,
12-C, Gandhidham,
Kutch (Gujarat)
…Second Party
For the First Party
:
Shri K.V. Gadhia
For the Second Party
:
None
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-37011/6/2009-
IR(B-II) dated 31.12.2009 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in
respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the chairman, Kandla Port Trust, Kandla, Gandhidham in not regularizing Shri Hadiya
Bhupendra Jetha as regular Mistry against the vacant post is legal and justified? What relief the workman is
entitled?”
1.
The reference dates back to 31.12.2009.Despite service of notice to both the party, the second party does not
prefer to submit the statement of claim despite giving dozen of opportunities. The reference is approximately 9 years
old and the first party filed the vakalatpatra of his advocate. The second party advocate failed to explain as to why the
statement of claim has not been filed.
2.
Thus it appears that the second party is not willing to prosecute the reference.
3.
Thus the reference is disposed of in the absence of the statement of claim of the second party with the
observation as under: “the action of the chairman, Kandla Port Trust, Kandla, Gandhidham in not regularizing Shri
Hadiya Bhupendra Jetha as regular Mistry against the vacant post is legal and justified.”
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 3 tuojh] 2018
dk-vk- 75-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj dkaMyk iksVZ
VªLV ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn (xqtjkr) ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 194@2013) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks
03-01-2018 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&37011@13@2013&vkbZvkj (ch&II)º
jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 3rd January, 2018
S.O. 75.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 194/2013) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of
Kandla Port Trust and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 03.01.2018.
[No. L-37011/13/2013-IR (B-II)]
RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
201
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,
Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,
Ahmedabad,
Dated 07th December, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 194/2013
The Secretary,
Kandla Port Trust, Administrative Office,
P.O. Box No. 50,
Gandhidham, Kutch (Gujarat)
…First Party
V/s
The General Secretary,
Transport & Dock Workers Union,
Kandla, 21, Yogesh Building, Plot No. 586,
12-C, Gandhidham,
Kutch (Gujarat)
…Second Party
For the First Party
:
Shri K.V. Gadhia
For the Second Party
:
None
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No.
L-37011/13/2013-IR(B-II) dated 19.11.2013 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal,
Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of M/s Golden Horn Containers Service, Gandhidham in terminating
the services of 35 workmen without due process is justified? What relief these 35 workman are entitled to?”
1.
The reference dates back to 19.11.2013.Despite service of notice to both the party, the second party does not
prefer to submit the statement of claim despite giving dozen of opportunities. The reference is more than 4 years old
and the first party filed the vakalatpatra of his advocate. The second party advocate failed to explain as to why the
statement of claim has not been filed.
2.
Thus it appears that the second party is not willing to prosecute the reference.
3.
Thus the reference is disposed of in the absence of the statement of claim of the second party with the
observation as under:”the action of the management of M/s Golden Horn Containers Service, Gandhidham in
terminating the services of 35 workmen without due process is justified.”
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 3 tuojh] 2018
dk-vk- 76-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj ;wukbVsM cSad
vkWiQ bafM;k ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn (xqtjkr) ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 344@2004) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks
03-01-2018 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&12011@128@2000&vkbZvkj (ch&II)º
jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
202
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
New Delhi, the 3rd January, 2018
S.O. 76.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 344/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of
United Bank of India and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 03.01.2018.
[No. L-12011/128/2000-IR (B-II)]
RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,
Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,
Ahmedabad,
Dated 07th December, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 344/2004
The Chief Regional Manager,
United Bank of India,
Western Region, 5th Floor, 25, sir Pheroz Shah Mehta Road,
Mumbai – 400001
…First Party
V/s
The Joint Secretary,
United Bank of India Sramik Karmachari Samity,
C/o UBI, Manekchawk Branch, Manekchawk,
Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380001
…Second Party
For the First Party
:
Shri K.V. Gadhia
For the Second Party
:
Shri B.M. Joshi
MODIFIED AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-12011/128/2000-
IR(B-II) dated 29.09.2000 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in
respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of United Bank of India in denying pensionary benefits to Shri B.H.
Chaudhary employed as permanent part-time Sweeper by rejecting his option for pension dated 29.09.1994 is
legal and justified? If not then to what relief the concerned workman is entitled to?”
1.
The reference dates back to 29.09.2000. The second party submitted the statement of claim Ex. 4 on 20.11.2000
along with number of documents and Solicitor Firm K.V. Gadhia Associates submitted the vakalatpatra Ex. 8 on
19.02.2011 but did not prefer to submit the written statement. Since the submission of vakalatpatra Ex. 8 by the first
party, the second party union failed to appear in person to lead his evidence. The advocate of the second party stated in
the court on 23.08.2017 that he tried to contact his client by writing a letter but he has not responded. It is also
noteworthy that on 06.02.2017, a notice was issued to the second party union to appear and lead evidence on
21.03.2017 but on 21.03.2017 and thereafter on 11.05.2017, 07.06.2017 and 23.08.2017, the second party union did not
appear. Thus in the light of the statement of the advocate and non-appearance of the second party union on aforesaid
dates, indicates that the second party union is not willing to prosecute the case.
2.
Thus the reference in the absence of the evidence of the second party, is finally disposed of with the observation
as under: “the action of the management of United Bank of India in denying pensionary benefits to Shri B.H.
Chaudhary employed as permanent part-time Sweeper by rejecting his option for pension dated 29.09.1994 is legal and
justified.”
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
203
ubZ fnYyh] 3 tuojh] 2018
dk-vk- 77-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj cSad vkWiQ
bafM;k ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn (xqtjkr) ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 60@2005) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks
03-01-2018 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&12012@41@2005&vkbZvkj (ch&II)º
jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 3rd January, 2018
S.O. 77.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 60/2005) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of
Bank of India and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 03.01.2018.
[No. L-12012/41/2005-IR (B-II)]
RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,
Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,
Ahmedabad,
Dated 06th December, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 60/2005
The Zonal Manager,
Bank of India,
Ahmedabad Zone, Bhadra,
Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
…First Party
V/s
The General Secretary,
Bank of India Staff Co-op. Housing Society,
No. 2, Near H.L. Commerce College,
Opp. Choice Restaurant Gali, Navrangpura,
Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
…Second Party
For the First Party
:
Shri D.C. Gandhi
For the Second Party
:
Shri Hemal K. Acharya
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No.
L-12012/41/2005-IR(B-II) dated 20.07.2005 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal,
Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of Bank of India in terminating the services of Shri D.M. Baxi from
the post of Cashier from its Relief Road Branch, Ahmedabad by imposing the punishment of compulsory
retirement is legal and justified? If not to what relief is the workman is entitled to and what extent?”
1.
The reference dates back to 20.07.2005.The second party workman in his statement of claim Ex. 4 has alleged
that he was appointed as Cash-cum-Accounts Clerk by the first party The Zonal Manager,Bank of India, Ahmedabad
204
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Zone, Bhadra, Ahmedabad, hereinafter referred to as first party on 15.12.1972. He had been working in various
branches of the first party with a record of satisfactory work and conduct and later on, he was promoted as Cashier and
Head Cashier in the category of C and E respectively. He has further alleged that on 31.05.2000, while he was working
as Head Cashier category E at Relief Road Branch of Ahmedabad, the Sepoy attached to the cash department of the
branch came late, therefore, cash operation of the bank could not commence in time and he himself managed the cash
from the cash safety to the various co-cashiers for the commencement of the work. But the manager of the branch
desired that he should hand over the charge of the cash to another cashier which he refused to do so unless the
procedure as required by manual of instructions is followed. Disregarding the said laid down procedure, the manager
insisted to his aforesaid decision. Consequently, the workman lost his control and resultantly he misbehaved with the
branch manager. He has further alleged that the branch manager reported the said incidence in a strict manner to the
competent authority, therefore, he was put under suspension on 01.06.2000 and a charge-sheet dated 20.07.2000 was
served on him, inter alia with following charges:
i.
Reporting late for duties on 31.05.2000, leaving the cash cabin endangering the safety and security of
cash, refusing to discharge the duties allotted and halting the functioning of the branch affecting customer
service;
ii.
Refusing to handover charge of the cash and throwing away the keys;
iii.
Abusing the manager using filthy language and shouting at him at the top of the voice, insulting him and
challenging his authority and exhibiting riotous disorderly and indecent behaviour in the branch
premises;
iv.
Assaulting the manager and creating bas scene/nuisance in the branch premises.
He has further alleged that the charge-sheet is itself a conspiracy. He is a member of minority union; therefore,
there was no one to represent him in the department enquiry. He has further alleged that he went under depression and
has undergone a treatment of a psychiatrist. He was not given proper opportunity to defend himself as being conducted
in a flagrant violation of the principles of natural justice because he submitted his defence on 23.10.2000 and the
enquiry office submitted the report on 24.10.2000. The deputy chief general manager of the first party issued a show
cause notice on the same day with a pre-determined mind to terminate his services. The workman submitted his reply
on 27.10.2000 w.r.t. the proposed punishment of compulsory retirement and the workman raised no. of issues in the
personal hearing but to no result and he was ordered to be compulsory retirement.
2.
The first party submitted the written statement Ex. 11 denying all the allegations made in the statement of claim
regarding mala-fide and flagrant violation of principles of natural justice in conducting the departmental enquiry and
proposed punishment. The first party has submitted no. of documents regarding department enquiry.
3.
The second party workman challenged the legality of the enquiry and submitted his affidavit Ex. 10 reiterating
the averments made in the statement of claim but in his cross-examination, he has stated that the department enquiry
was concluded on 18.10.2002 but he has not said anything which may create doubt regarding the enquiry.
4.
Later the record reveals that the workman has expired on 03.03.2014, vide application Ex. 13, his legal heirs is
substituted but he did not pursue the case. Since then, they have not been appearing. The charges levelled in the charge-
sheet are serious one and the punishment of compulsory retirement was imposed and I do not find any illegality in the
department enquiry and the punishment imposed. It is also noteworthy that the compulsory retirement does not deprive
the workman or his family from the gratuity, provident fund and pension. Therefore, no interference is required.
5.
The award is passed accordingly.
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 3 tuojh] 2018
dk-vk- 78-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj dkaMyk iksVZ
VªLV ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn (xqtjkr) ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 119@2010) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks
03-01-2018 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&37011@9@2008&vkbZvkj (ch&II)º
jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
205
New Delhi, the 3rd January, 2018
S.O. 78.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 119/2010) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of
Kandla Port Trust and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 03.01.2018.
[No. L-37011/9/2008-IR (B-II)]
RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,
Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,
Ahmedabad,
Dated 07th December, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 119/2010
The Chairman,
Kandla Port Trust,
P.O. Box No. 50,
Gandhidham, Kutch (Gujarat)
…First Party
V/s
The General Secretary,
Transport & Dock Workers Union,
Kandla, 21, Yogesh Building, Plot No. 586,
12-C, Gandhidham,
Kutch (Gujarat)
…Second Party
For the First Party
:
Shri K.V. Gadhia
For the Second Party
:
None
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-37011/9/2008-
IR(B-II) dated 10.02.2009 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in
respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of Kandla Port Trust, P.O. Box No. 50, Gandhidham, Kutch in
posting of Dresser in place of First Aider after retirement of Shri Shobnath Tiwari, First Aider, is legal and
justified? What relief the workman concerned is entitled to?”
1.
The reference dates back to 10.02.2009.Despite service of notice to both the party, the second party does not
prefer to submit the statement of claim despite giving dozen of opportunities. The reference is approximately9 years old
and the first party filed the vakalatpatra of his advocate. The second party advocate failed to explain as to why the
statement of claim has not been filed. Thus it appears that the second party is not willing to prosecute the reference.
2.
Thus the reference is disposed of in the absence of the statement of claim of the second party with the
observation as under:”the action of the management of Kandla Port Trust, P.O. Box No. 50, Gandhidham, Kutch in
posting of Dresser in place of First Aider after retirement of Shri Shobnath Tiwari, First Aider, is legal and justified.”
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 3 tuojh] 2018
dk-vk- 79-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj fot;k cSad
ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
206
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn (xqtjkr) ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 377@2004) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks
03-01-2018 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&12011@241@2000&vkbZvkj (ch&II)º
jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 3rd January, 2018
S.O. 79.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 377/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of
Vijaya Bank and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 03.01.2018.
[No. L-12011/241/2000-IR (B-II)]
RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,
Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,
Ahmedabad,
Dated 08th December, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 377/2004
The Branch Manager,
Vijaya Bank, Regional Office,
Kamdhenu Complex, Near Polytechnic, Ambawadi,
Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
…First Party
V/s
The General Secretary,
Vijaya Bank Workers Organisation,
C/o Vijaya Bank, Navarangpura Branch,
Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
…Second Party
For the First Party
:
Shri Sanjay Kurian
For the Second Party
:
Shri K.R. Mishra
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-
12011/241/2000-IR(B-II) dated 29.01.2001 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad
(Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of Vijaya Bank, Regional Office, Ahmedabad in
terminating/discontinuing the services of temporary/casual employees Shri Vithalbhai Veljibhai Leeva and 23
others w.e.f. 15.11.1995 without complying the provisions of Section 25 F, G and H of the Industrial Dispute
Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, then to what relief the concerned employees are entitled to?”
1.
The reference dates back to 29.01.2001.The second party submitted the statement of claim on 17.09.2004
enclosed with the list of workmen along with application Ex. 10 for staying the recruitment process likely to be
followed by the management violating the due process of law. The then Presiding Office vide order Ex. 17 dated
14.06.2011 stayed the recruitment process as prayed by the second party union/workmen.
2.
The first party submitted the written statement Ex. 26 on 18.11.2011. Thereafter, the second party submitted the
affidavits Ex. 28, 29, 30, 31 and 32 of the workmen Manojkumar Deepaji Mahabhar, Govind Mangalsinh Devda, Amit
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
207
Ambalal Raval, Shailesh Bhagchandra Bhrambhatt and Chetan Bhikhabhai Solanki respectively. None of the witness
was cross-examined by the first party despite giving number of opportunities. Thereafter, the second party advocate
moved an application Ex. 33 on 21.01.2013 for closing the right of first party to cross-examine the aforesaid witnesses.
Since then, the second party and his witnesses have been absent and have not been appearing despite giving number of
opportunities. Today on 08.12.2017, the advocate for the second party union Shri K.R. Mishra orally stated that the
matter has been settled between the parties and the second party union and its workmen have not been in his contact,
therefore, the second party has not been appearing. The advocate for the first party is present for cross-examining the
aforesaid second party witness.
3.
Thus it appears that second party union or the workmen are not willing to prosecute the case.
4.
Thus the reference is disposed of in the absence of the evidence of the second party union/workmen with the
observation as under: ‘‘the action of the management of Vijaya Bank, Regional Office, Ahmedabad in
terminating/discontinuing the services of temporary/casual employees Shri Vithalbhai Veljibhai Leeva and 23 others
w.e.f. 15.11.1995 without complying the provisions of Section 25 F, G and H of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 is
legal and justified.”
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 3 tuojh] 2018
dk-vk- 80-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj ikjknhi iksVZ
VªLV ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] Hkqous'oj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 15@2017) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks
03-01-2018 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&38011@03@2016&vkbZvkj (ch&II)º
jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 3rd January, 2018
S.O. 80.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 15/2017) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Bhubaneswar as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Paradip
Port Trust and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 03.01.2018.
[No. L-38011/03/2016-IR (B-II)]
RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, BHUBANESWAR
Present:
Shri B.C. Rath,
Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-cum-Labour
Court, Bhubaneswar
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 15/2017
No. L-38011/03/2016-IR(B-II), dated 13.02.2017
Date of Passing Order – 15th November, 2017
Between:
The Chairman,
Paradip Port Trust, Paradip,
Dist. Jagatsinghpur, Odisha
…1st Party-Management
(And)
The General Secretary,
Paradip Port Workers Union,
Badapadia, Paradip Port, Jagatsinghpur,
Odisha
…2nd Party-Union
208
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Appearances:
None
…
For the 1st Party-Management
None
…
For the 2nd Party-Union
ORDER
Case taken up. Parties are absent. The 2nd Party-Union has not filed any statement of claim despite notice
through regd. post. As such, it seems that the 2nd party-Union is not interested in prosecuting its case. However the
dispute cannot be adjudicated upon for want of pleadings on behalf of the parties. As such there is no alternative except
to return the reference to the Government for necessary action at its end.
2.
Accordingly the reference is returned to the Government unanswered for necessary action at its end.
Dictated & Corrected by me.
B. C. RATH, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 3 tuojh] 2018
dk-vk- 81-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj dksjiksjs'ku
cSad ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- 1] fnYyh ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 70@2017) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks
03-01-2018 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&12012@09@2017&vkbZvkj (ch&II)º
jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 3rd January, 2018
S.O. 81.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 70/2017) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court No. 1, Delhi as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of
Corpoaration Bank and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 03.01.2018.
[No. L-12012/09/2017-IR (B-II)]
RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
IN THE COURT OF SHRI AVTAR CHAND DOGRA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT NO.1, ROOM NO. 511, DWARKA COURT COMPLEX,
SECTOR-10 DWARKA, DELHI-110075
ID. No. 70/2017
Shri Nirmal Prasad, C/o Corporation Bank,
Safai Karmachari Sangh, Office: 6054,
Gali Mandir Satya Naryana, Nabi Karim,
Paharganj
New Delhi-110055
…Claimant
Versus
1.
General Manager,
Personnel Administrative Division,
Industrial Relations Wing, Head Office,
Mangala Devi Temple Road,
Mangalore-575001
2.
The General Manager,
TAD, Corporation Bank,
Deshbhandu, Gupta Road, Karol Bagh,
New Delhi-110005
…Managements
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
209
AWARD
In the present case, a reference was received from the appropriate Government vide letter No.L-
12012/09/2017(IR(B-II)) dated 20.03.2017 under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the
Act, for adjudication of a dispute, terms of which are as under:
“Whether the workman Shri Nirmal Prasad, M.No. 1685, Part Time Sweeper is entitled for the difference of
salary for the period of suspension from the Management of Corporation Bank after conclusion of proceedings
and order by the Appellate Authority? If not, then what relief the workman is entitled to?”
2.
In the reference order, the appropriate Government commanded the party/ies raising the dispute to file statement
of claim, complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses with this Tribunal within 15 days of receipt
of the reference order and to forward a copy of such statement of claim to the opposite parties involved in the dispute.
Despite directions so given, Claimant opted not to file his claim statement with the Tribunal.
3.
On receipt of the above reference, notice was sent to the workman as well as the managements. Neither the
postal article sent to the claimant, referred above, was received back nor was it observed by the Tribunal that postal
services remained affected during the period, referred above. Therefore, every presumption lies in favour of the fact
that the above notice was served upon the claimant. Despite service of the notice, claimant opted to abstain away from
the proceedings. No claim statement was filed on his behalf. Thus, it is clear that the claimant is not interested in
adjudication of the reference on merits.
4.
Since the claimant has neither put in his appearance nor has he led any evidence so as to prove his cause against
the management, as such, this Tribunal is left with no choice, except to pass a ‘No Dispute/Claim’ award. Let this
award be sent to the appropriate Government, as required under Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, for
publication.
Date : December 14, 2017
A. C. DOGRA, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 3 tuojh] 2018
dk-vk- 82-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vksfj;UVy
cSad vkWiQ dkelZ ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 30@2007) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks
03-01-2018 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&12012@115@2006&vkbZvkj (ch&II)º
jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 3rd January, 2018
S.O. 82.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 30/2007) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Oriental
Bank of Commerce and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 03.01.2018.
[No. L-12012/115/2006-IR (B-II)]
RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT AT
HYDERABAD
Present : Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer
Dated the 27th day of October, 2017
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 30/2007
Between :
Sri T. Rajender Singh,
8-3-228/606/1, Rahmath Nagar,
Yousufguda,
Hyderabad -45
…Petitioner
210
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
AND
The General Manager (HRD),
Oriental Bank of Commerce,
S.B.U., Ashoka My Home Chambers,
1-8-303, Sardar Patel Road,
Secunderabad – 500 003
…Respondent
Appearances :
For the Petitioner
:
Sri William Burra, Advocate
For the Respondent
:
M/s. K. Raghuram Reddy & M. Subramanya Sastry, Advocates
AWARD
The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its order No. L-12012/115/2006-IR(B-II) dated 5.6.2007
referred the following dispute under section 10(1)(d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 requiring this forum to decide the question:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of Oriental Bank of Commerce by regularising the services of some
of the workmen of erstwhile Global Trust Bank and not regularising the services of Shri T. Rajender Singh,
Ex-runner is legal and/or justified? If not, what relief the workman is entitled to?”
On receipt of the reference this Tribunal has registered and numbered the reference as I.D. No. 30/2007 and
issued notices to both the workman and the management. They both appeared before the court and engaged their
respective counsels with the leave of the court and consent of either party.
2.
The averments made in the claim statement in brief are as follows:
It is submitted that the Petitioner worked as Runner from 1.2.1997 to 30.11.2005 in erstwhile Global Trust Bank
and later in the Oriental Bank of Commerce, Secunderabad. Initially, he worked as Runner through M/s. Agile and
Suraksha Security Services from 1.2.1997 to 31.1.2001 and through Global Corporate Services from 1.2.2001 to
14.8.2004 and thereafter worked through the same agency from 14.8.2004 onwards for Oriental Bank of Commerce,
Secunderabad. The Petitioner submits that other workmen who worked with him in similar capacity in the erstwhile
Global Trust Bank are absorbed in the Oriental Bank of Commerce, whereas he was not considered on the grounds of
eligibility criteria. The Petitioner’s total service was more than 8 years and he has worked for more than 300 days in
each year. He studied upto 8th class and also able to read and write, three languages, viz., Telugu, English and Hindi. It
is further stated that the Respondent management has entered into an agreement with the representatives of the
Federation, New Delhi on 30.9.2005, wherein it was agreed to absorb the erstwhile runners working through agencies
as Peons in subordinate cadre with minimum educational qualification of 8th standard. Even though the Petitioner has
fulfilled all the conditions laid down for absorption his application was not considered. The details of attendance
shows that during the year 2004-2005, the Petitioner worked for more than 240 days in a year. Provisions of Sec.25-F
were not observed in terminating the services of the Petitioner. He prayed to direct the Respondent bank for his
absorption/reinstatement with back wages, continuity of service and other attendant benefits.
3.
Respondents filed their counter with the averments in brief as follows:
There is no employer-employee relationship between the Respondent bank and the Petitioner as he was engaged
as Runner through M/s Agile and Suraksha Security Services for some time and thereafter through M/s Global
Corporate Services, as admitted by him. It can not be said that the Petitioner was ever a workman as no appointment
letter was issued to him by the erstwhile Global Trust Bank or by the Oriental Bank of Commerce. After merger of
Global Trust Bank with Oriental Bank of Commerce the Respondent bank was under no obligation to absorb the
employee of outsourcing agency who was working on their behalf for Global Trust Bank. However, as per the
guidelines approved by the Board of Directors of the Bank, a circular dated 28.10.2005 was issued which provides
that only those persons who were working through the outsourcing agencies with erstwhile Global Trust Bank as on the
date of amalgamation i.e., 14.8.2004 will be eligible for consideration for absorption subject to fulfilling other
conditions of eligibility criteria. The Petitioner does not possess the required educational qualification is pass in VIII
standard as per the said circular, thus, he was not considered for absorption and he was informed accordingly.
Therefore, the present reference is not maintainable in law and liable to be rejected.
4.
The Petitioner has examined himself as WW1 and has also exhibited the photostat copies of four documents
which are marked as i.e., Ex.W1 to W4. The Respondent has examined Sri J.P. Sarma, the Chief Manager of the Bank
as MW1 and Sri Dr. Vijay Kumar, the Senior Manager of the Bank as MW2 on their behalf and also relied on eight
documents which have been marked as exhibits Ex.M1 to M8.
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
211
5.
I have already heard from both the sides in this matter.
6.
In view of the pleadings of both the sides, the points for consideration are as follows:
I.
Whether the action of the management of Oriental Bank of Commerce by regularising the services of
some of the workmen of erstwhile Global Trust Bank and not regularising the services of Shri T.
Rajender Singh, Ex-runner is legal and/or justified?
II.
If not, what relief the workman is entitled to?
7.
The Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner contended that the Petitioner worked as a Runner
from 1.2.1997 to 30.11.2005 in the erstwhile Global Trust Bank and later in the Oriental Bank of Commerce at
Secunderabad. Initially, the Petitioner worked as a Runner through M/s. Agile and Suraksha Security Services from
1.2.1997 to 31.1.2001 and through Global Corporate Services from 1.2.2001 to 14.8.2004 and thereafter worked
through the same agency from 15.8.2004 onwards for the Respondent (Oriental Bank of Commerce, Secunderabad). In
all the Petitioner has rendered more than 8 years of service, out of which, six years through the aforesaid agencies and
about more than two years directly under the Respondent during the period from 22.8.2002 to 30.11.2005. Finally on
30.11.2005 his services were terminated. It is contended that the Petitioner worked as a Runner and he used to work
from 1997 to 2005 not less than 300 days in any calendar year. The duties of a Runner as admitted by the management
witnesses are – carrying instruments like cheques, DDs from branches to service centre, and in case runners are posted
in the administrative offices, they used to take care distribution of dispatch within the office/Department and related
filing works. It is further contended that the nature of work of Runner as admitted by the management witness is
perennial in nature. The engagement of contract labour in such work through outsourcing agency is only “Sham”
contract. Therefore, the Petitioner is deemed to be an employee directly employed by the Respondent bank during the
period from 1.2.1997 to 30.11.2005. Thus, the services rendered by the Petitioner through outsourcing agencies firstly
with the erstwhile Global Trust Bank and secondly with the Oriental Bank of Commerce is a “sham” contract. Hence,
the Petitioner is deemed to be an employee directly by the bank and hence in this case master and servant relationship
or employer and employee relationship is clearly established. It is also contended that the other workmen who worked
with the Petitioner in similar capacity in the erstwhile Global Trust Bank are absorbed in the Oriental Bank of
Commerce whereas, the Petitioner was not considered on the ground of eligibility criteria. The Petitioner’s total
service was more than 8 years and he has worked for more than 300 days in each year. He has studied upto class VIII
and also able to read and write three languages, i.e., Telugu, English and Hindi. It is also contended that the
Respondent management has entered into an agreement with the representatives of the Federation, New Delhi on
30.9.2005 wherein it had been agreed to absorb, the erstwhile Global Trust Bank Runners working through agencies as
Peons in subordinate cadres with minimum educational qualification of 8th standard. Even though the Petitioner has
fulfilled all the conditions laid down for absorption, his application was not considered. The details of attendance
shows that during the year 2004-2005 the Petitioner has worked for more than 240 days in a year. The Respondent
bank while terminating the Petitioner from service has not followed the provisions of Sec.25-F of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947. The Petitioner is required to be absorbed as a permanent employee in the Respondent bank with
back wages, continuity of service and other attendant benefits.
8.
On the other hand, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent contended that there is no
employer and employee relationship between the Respondent bank and the Petitioner as he was engaged as a Runner
through M/s. Agile and Suraksha Security Services for some time and thereafter through Global Corporate Services as
admitted by him. As per his contention, no appointment letter was issued to the Petitioner either by the erstwhile
Global Trust Bank or by the Oriental Bank of Commerce. After merger of Global Trust Bank with the Oriental Bank
of Commerce the Respondent bank was under no obligation to absorb the employees of outsourcing agencies, who
were working on their behalf for Global Trust Bank. He further contended that as per the guidelines approved by the
Board of Directors of the Bank on 20.8.2005. One circular was issued by the Respondent, wherein it had been
provided that only those persons who were working through outsourcing agencies with the erstwhile Global Trust Bank
as on the date of amalgamation i.e., 14.8.2004 will be eligible for absorption subject to fulfilling other conditions of
eligibility criteria. As admitted by the Petitioner he does not possess the required educational qualification as required
in the guidelines. As per his contention the documents relied on by the Petitioner vide Ex.W2 clearly states that “only
those Runners/office boys who were working in the erstwhile Global Trust Bank branches/offices as on the date of
amalgamation i.e., 14.8.2004 would be eligible to apply, minimum qualification required should be 8th standard pass.
Admittedly, the Petitioner had applied for the post of Runner but Ex.W1, the Photostat copy of the form of transfer
certificate goes to show that at the time of leaving the school, the Petitioner was studying in Class VIII which clearly
indicates that he has not passed VIII standard which shows that on the own admission of the Petitioner he has not
passed VIII standard and has not fulfilled the required criteria to be absorbed as a Runner in the Respondent’s bank at
the time of its amalgamation, and for this reason the case of the Petitioner was not considered, and he had been
informed accordingly. Further more, the Petitioner has not impleaded the contractors/outsourcing agencies as parties
in this case under whom he was working and in absence of the contractors the case of as such the Petitioner is liable to
212
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
be dismissed and the Petitioner is not entitled to get any relief. Therefore, the claim of the Petitioner is not tenable in
the eye of Law, and is liable to be rejected.
9.
On consideration of the rival contentions of the Advocates of both the sides as well as the evidence adduced by
the parties and the materials available on record it is seen that no documents have been filed from the side of the
Petitioner to show that, which workmen worked with the Petitioner in similar capacity in the erstwhile Global Trust
Bank are absorbed in the Oriental Bank of Commerce. Admittedly, the Petitioner was not considered to be absorbed in
the Respondent’s bank on the ground of eligibility criteria. Pursuant to the guidelines, vide Ex.W2, the Petitioner has
applied for absorption as Runner, wherein minimum criteria to be eligible for the post was passing of class VIII.
Ex.W1 clearly indicates that the Petitioner has not passed class VIII at the time of filing of the application. When he
has not fulfilled the required criteria to be absorbed as a Runner, his case was not considered and the Respondent bank
has not regularized his services as Runner and the same has been intimated to the Petitioner. in such a circumstances, it
can safely be stated that the action of the Respondent bank in not regularising the service of Sri T. Rajendar Singh,
Ex.Runner is not legal and justified.
Thus, Point No.I is answered accordingly.
10.
Point No.II: Admittedly, the Petitioner was working as a Runner through M/s. Agile and Suraksha Security
Services from 1.2.1997 to 31.1.2001 and through Global Corporate Services from 1.2.2001 to 14.8.2004 and thereafter
worked through the same agency from 14.8.2004 onwards for the Respondent. The Respondent has utilized the
services of the Petitioner for a long period. MW2 in his cross examination has clearly admitted that the contract
agreement entered between the erstwhile Global Trust Bank and Global Corporate Services, Ex.M5 came into force on
22.8.2000 and expired after completion of 24 months for a period of two years which was directly with the erstwhile
Global Trust Bank. Therefore the service rendered by the Petitioner though through outsourcing agency, but it was
taken directly under the Respondent from 22.8.2000 to 14.8.2004, similarly when the Global Trust Bank was
amalgamated with Oriental Bank of Commerce, from 14.8.2004 onwards, the Petitioner rendered service directly
under the Oriental Bank of Commerce, and he was terminated after lapse of one year of the amalgamation, i.e., from
14.8.2004 to 30.11.2005, which clearly shows that the Petitioner has rendered his services to Respondent during the
aforesaid period. It is also not known how the Respondent was utilizing the services of the Petitioner from 22.8.2002
onwards when admittedly there was no agreement between the Respondent and the outsourcing agencies. This shows
that the Respondent was well aware of the fact that the Petitioner is working under its establishment as a workman and
the Respondent has utilized the services of the Petitioner like an employee of the establishment and as such, employer
and employee relationship was existing between the Respondent and the Petitioner, and the plea of the Respondent that
they were utilizing the services of the Petitioner only through outsourcing agency i.e., the contractors, is not
acceptable. Moreover, the Respondent has failed either to produce any document or to show any reason in which way
he has engaged the Petitioner in his establishment after its amalgamation. Further more, the Respondent has admitted
that bank has considered the application of the Petitioner for his absorption as Runner but as the Petitioner failed to
fulfill the required criteria for the post of Runner. It was not considered. This shows that when the case of the
Petitioner was not considered and the Respondent has failed to absorb him in the bank, he terminated the services of
the Petitioner. But Before termination of the Petitioner from service the Respondent bank had to see the plight of the
workman, when workman had worked for more than 8 years under its establishment through outsourcing agency as
well as directly and was also acquainted with the work culture. In such a circumstances the Respondent should have
engaged the workman atleast as a daily rated labour. But the Respondent has not considered the case of the workman.
More over, while terminating the services of the Petitioner the Respondent has to comply with the provisions required
under Sec.25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, but in this case, it has not been done. Admittedly, the Petitioner
has worked for more than 8 years under the Respondent, through different agencies continuously as a Runner and also
out of which, for one year and four months directly under the Respondent and as such, the Petitioner comes under the
definition of a workman under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. When the Petitioner was retrenched from service the
Respondent was expected to retrench the workman as per the provisions contained under Sec.25.F of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947. But in this case the Respondent has not complied it. Therefore, the termination/retrenchment of
the Petitioner workman is in violation of Sec.25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Since the Respondent has not
shown the reasons for the retrenchment of the workman and even the workman is not in receipt of any notice of
termination or notice or notice pay/one month pay and if the workman was not paid any retrenchment compensation of
15 days average pay for every completed year of service; the retrenchment or termination of the Petitioner workman is
illegal, and the Petitioner is entitled to get benefit under Sec.25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
Thus, Point No.II is answered accordingly.
11.
In view of the findings given under Point Nos. I & II, the Petitioner is entitled to get a chance to work under
the Respondent atleast as a daily rated workman and is also entitled to get the terminal benefits as required under
Sec.25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
213
Result:
In view of the findings given in Point No.I, the reference is answered as follows:
The action of the management of Oriental Bank of Commerce of regularising the services of some of the
workmen erstwhile Global Trust Bank and not regularising the services of Shri T. Rajender Singh, Ex-runner is legal
and justified. But, in view of the findings given Point No.II, as the workman has not been retrenched by following due
procedure of Law, the Respondent should consider the Petitioner for his absorption as a daily rated worker, if he is
eligible to work. If the Petitioner is not eligible to work under any rules, the Respondent is at liberty to retrench the
Petitioner only by following the procedure laid down under Sec.25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.
Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant transcribed by her and corrected by me on
this the 27th day of October, 2017.
MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer
Appendix of evidence
Witnesses examined for the
Witnesses examined for the
Petitioner
Respondent
WW1: Sri T Rajender Singh
MW1: Sri J.P. Sarma
MW2: Sri Dr. Vijay Kumar Joseph
Documents marked for the Petitioner
Ex.W1
:
Photostat of Copy of school leaving certificate
Ex.W2
:
Photostat of circular dated 28.10.2005 issued by the Respondent bank erstwhile Global Trust
Bank
Ex.W3
:
Photostat of representation dt.28.7.2004 of WW1
Ex.W4
:
Photostat of application dt. 13.8.2004 of WW1
Documents marked for the Respondent
Ex.M1
:
Photostat of lr.No.Q&O/CMR/LET/732/2005 dt.30.11.2005
Ex.M2
:
Agreement between Globla Trust Bank and M/s Global Corporate Services
Ex.M3
:
Attendance register for the period from 1.4.2005 to 31.3.2007
Ex.M4
:
Attendance register for the period from January 2005 to January, 2006
Ex.M5
:
Agreement dt. 20.3.2002 relating to record keeping services
Ex.M6
:
Agreement relating to house keeping etc..
Ex.M7
:
Photostat copy of payment particulars of the Petitioner to the Global Corporate Services Pvt. Ltd.,
for the month of October 2005
Ex.M8
:
Photostat copy of bank statement of account of M/s Global Corporate Services Pvt. Ltd for the
period from 31.3.2000 to 6.1.2006
ubZ fnYyh] 8 tuojh] 2018
dk-vk- 83-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ feM~<k
baVjizkbtst ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] t;iqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 23@2017) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks
27-12-2017 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&22012@15@2017&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º
jktsUæ flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
214
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
New Delhi, the 8th January, 2018
S.O. 83.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 23/2017) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Jaipur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. Middha
Enterprises and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 27.12.2017.
[No. L-22012/15/2017-IR (CM-II)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, JAIPUR
Presiding Officer, Bharat Pandey
I.D. 23/2017
Reference No.L-22012/15/2017[IR(CM-2)] dated: 19.7.2017
Shri Ram Kumar
S/o Sh. Hanuman Prasad Saraswat
R/o Binani Chowk, Bikaner
V/s
1.
Project Head
Neyveli Lignite Corporation
India Limited,Barsingsar,
Tehsil & District : Bikaner.
2.
Proprietor, M/s Middha Enterprises
Bikaner Road, Suratgarh – 335804.
AWARD
Dated: 28.11.2017
1.
The Central Government in exercise of the powers under clause (d) of Sub Section 1 & 2(A) of Section 10 of
the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 has referred the following Industrial dispute to this tribunal for adjudication:-
^^D;k izca/ku] eS0 us;oyh fyxukbZV dkiksZjs’ku bf.M;k fy0] chdkusj ds Bsdsnkj QeZ eS0 feM~Mk ,UVjizkbZtst lwjrx< dk
deZdkj Jh jke dqekj lqijokbZtj dks fnukad 06-01-2016 ls ukSdjh ls i`Fkd fd;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr ,oa U;k;laxr gS\ ;fn
ugh arks deZdkj D;k vuqrks"k ikus dk vf/kdkjh gS \**
2.
Pursuant to the receipt of the reference order, registered notices were issued to the parties as per the order of the
tribunal fixing. 26.10.2017 for filing statement of claim.
3.
On 26.10.17 Sh. Sunil Kumar Pareek, CPF No.36598, Manager/Geology, NLC. India Ltd., Barsingsar Project,
appeared on behalf of non-applicant. None appeared on behalf of applicant. Sh. Sunil Kumar Pareek alleged that both
the parties have entered into compromise. Next date 16.11.17 was fixed for both the parties to appear for filing
compromise or statement of claim.
4.
Sh. Sunil Kumar Pareek on 26.10.2017 filed photocopy of notice sent to non-applicant by tribunal, photocopy
of authority dated 23.10.2007 by non-applicant to Sh. Sunil Kumar Pareek to appear in tribunal on 26.10.17 for
representing the non-applicant, photocopy of minutes of meeting dated 9.6.17 about conciliation held at R.L.C., Jaipur.
The content shows that parties have agreed during conciliation to settle their dispute outside the court & withdraw the
complaint against Biharilal, Proprietor, Middha Enterprises, Bikaner Road, Suratgarh & NLC India Ltd. before the
R.L.C., Jaipur.
5.
On 30.10.2017 registered letter sent by applicant Sh. Ramkumar was received by tribunal which was taken on
record. The content of the letter says that all the parties of the case have entered into compromise & there is no
outstanding dispute between the parties which is required to be settled & applicant does not want to pursue the matter
further hence, further proceeding in the matter may be dropped. The letter has been attached with photocopy of an
undated compromise.
6.
On 16.11.2017 applicant Sh. Ramkumar personally appeared. Sh. Sunil Kumar Pareek appeared on behalf of
non-applicant. Sh. Ramkumar applicant was identified by Sh. Sunil Kumar Pareek. Both applicant & Sh. Sunil Kumar
Pareek on behalf of non-applicant filed undated original compromise which was taken on record. Content of the
compromise was read over & explained to both the parties & they admitted to have entered into the compromise
supporting the recitals of the compromise deed. Applicant Sh. Ramkumar further file an applicant to decide the case on
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
215
the basis of compromise. This application was endorsed by Sh. Sunil Kumar Pareek contending that he is not having
any objection in disposal of the matter as alleged by Sh. Ramkumar. Accordingly, matter was fixed for disposal of the
case in Lok-Adalat on 28.11.2017.
7.
The application of the applicant Sh. Ramkumar dated 16.11.2017 to dispose the case on the basis of
compromise & compromise filed on 16.11.17 read as under:-
Jheku~ U;k;ky; dsUnzh; vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k ,ao Je U;k;ky;] t;iqj
eq- la[;k 23@2017
rk- is- 16-11-2017
jkedqekj cuke eS- us;osyh fyXukbV dk- fy-
Jhekuth]
mDr muoku 'kh"kZd izdj.k esa vkt fn% 16-11-2017 dks rkjh[k is'kh fu;r gSA fuosnu gS fd izdj.k esa izfri{k la- 1 o 2 o
izfri{kh la- 3 ds chp esa vkilh lgefr ls jkthukek gks x;k gS rFkk fuLrkj.k ;ksX; dksbZ fookn 'ks"k ugha gSA jkthukes dh izfr layXu
gSA vr% Jheku~ ls fuosnu gS fd eSa jkedqekj izfri{kh la- 3 vkxs dksbZ dk;Zokgh ugha pkgrk u gh dksbZ Dyse pkgrk gwWaA
vr% izkFkZuk i= izLrqr dj fuosnu gS fd izdj.k esa jkthukek gks tkus ds vk/kkj ij ekeys dks fuLrkfjr dj vkns'k Qjek;k
tkosaA
fn% 16-11-2017
izkFkhZ
mijksDr izdkj ls ekeys
gLrk{kj iBuh;
ds fuLrkj.k ls eSa
jkedqekj iq= Jh guqeku izlkn
iw.kZr;k lger gw¡A
tkfr lkjLor fuoklh
fcUuk.kh pkSd chdkusj
gLrk{kj viBuh
Identified Mr. Ram kumar
(S.K. Pareek)
gLrk{kj viBuh;
(S.K. Pareek/NLCIL)
NLC IL on behalf of Project Head / NLC IL
layXud & 1
layXud & 1
layXud & 1
layXud & 1
jkthukek
jkthukek
jkthukek
jkthukek
¼1½ jkedqekj iq= Jh guqeku izlkn lkjLor] tkfr&lkjLor
fuoklh fcuk.kh pkSd] chdkusj] gky Mh&608]
eqjyh/kj O;kl uxj chdkusj
------izFke i{k
¼1½ izkstsDV gsM] us;osyh fyXukbV dks- fy-] cjflaglj]
rglhy o ftyk&chdkusj
¼2½
fcgkjhyky] izksijkbZVj] fe<+k bUVjizkbZtst] chdkusj jksM+]
lwjrx<+] ftyk& Jhxaxkuxj
------f}rh; i{k
;g jkthukek mHk; i{kksa }kjk vkt fnuakd 9-6-2017 dks fu"ikfnr fd;k tk jgk gSA
1-
;g fd izFke i{k f}rh; i{k ds ;gka fo/kqr lqijokbZtj ds in ij lsokjr jgk gS ftldks NaVuh ds nkSjku in eqDr djus
dks ysdj nksuksa i{kdkjksa ds e/; fookn jgk gSA mDr fookn dks ysdj izFke i{k ds }kjk {ks=h; dk;kZy;] Je vk;qDr
¼dsUnzh;½ ds le{k ifjosnu is'k fd;k x;k Fkk ftldk fu.kZ; fnukad 24-01-2017 dks ikfjr fd;k tk pqdk gSA
2-
;g fd nksuksa i{kdkjku ds e/; izkstsDV gSM o dksjiksjs'ku ds vf/kdkjh;ksa ds }kjk e/;LFkrk o okrkZ ds ifj.kke Lo:i
nksuaks i{kksa esa jkthukek gks x;k gSA
3-
;g fd izFke i{k dh NaVuh ckcr f}rh; i{kdkjku us izfrdj ¼eqvkotk½ jkf'k izFke i{k dks vnk dj nh x;h gS ftlds
ifj.kke Lo:i izFke i{k] f}rh; i{k ds fo:) lHkh dkuwuh o U;kf;d dk;Zokgh Mªki dj nsxk o iwoZ ds fookn lEcfU/kr
dksbZ dk;Zokgh ugha djsxkA
4-
;g fd izFke i{k orZeku esa f}rh; i{k ¼us;osyh fyXukbZV dks- fy-½ esa dk;Zjr gS ftldks iwoZ ds fookn dks ysdj rax o
ijs'kku ugha fd;k tk;sxkA
216
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
5-
;g fd mDr jkthukek fd lHkh 'krksZa ls nksuksa i{k ikcan jgsaxsA
mijksDr jkthukek nksuksa i{kksa }kjk jkth [kq'kh o LorU= lgefr ls fu"ikfnr fd;k x;k gSA
fu"iknudrkZ
gLrk{kj iBuh;
¼1½ ¼jkedqekj½
izFke i{k
¼1½ gLrk{kj viBuh; ¼xksy jcj lhy foi{kh½
¼2½ gLrk{kj viBuh;
jcj LVSEi ¼fe<+k bUVjizkbZtst½
f}rh; i{kdkj
8.
On 28.11.17 in Lok- Adalat case was taken up for disposal on the basis of application dated 16.11.17 to dispose
the case on the basis of compromise filed by them. None appeared from either side in the Lok-Adalat on 28.11.17,
however, the case was disposed on the basis of compromise allowing the application of the parties to dispose the case
on the basis of compromise. The order passed in Lok-Adalat on 28.11.17 is read as under:-
28-11-2017 yksd vnkyr
yksd vnkyr
yksd vnkyr
yksd vnkyr
i=koyh vkt yksd vnkyr esa izLrqr gqbZA iqdkj dh x;hA i{kdkj vuqifLFkr gSA lqygukek ds vk/kkj
ij eqdnesa dks fuLrkfjr djus dh vkosnu fnuakfdr 16-11-17 dk voyksdu fd;kA
i{kdkjksa }kjk lqygukeksa dh rlnhd fnuakd 16-11-17 dks dh tk pqdh gS] vr% i{kdkjksa dh lqygukek ds
vk/kkj ij ekeys dks fuLrkfjr djus dh vkosnu Lohdkj dh tkrh gSA bl ekeys dks i{kdkjksa }kjk izLrqr
lqygukek fnukafdr 16-11-17 ds vk/kkj ij fuLrkfjr fd;k tkrk gSA layXud&1 lqygukek ,okMZ dk va'k gksxkA
gLrk{kj viBuh;
ihBklhu vf/kdkjh
9.
Award as above.
BHARAT PANDEY, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 9 tuojh] 2018
dk-vk- 84-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ ch-lh-
lh-,y- ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- 1] /uckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 05@1998) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 08-01-2018
dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&20012@400@1996&vkbZvkj (lh&I)º
,e- ds- flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 9th January, 2018
S.O. 84.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1,
Dhanbad (Ref. No. 05 of 1998) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to
the management of M/s. BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 08.01.2018.
[No. L-20012/400/1996-IR (C-I)]
M. K. SINGH, Section Officer
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
217
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 1, DHANBAD
In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D. Act, 1947
Reference : No. 05/1998
Employer in relation to the management of Govindpur Area of M/s. BCCL
AND
Their workman
Present : Shri R. K. Saran, Presiding Officer
Appearances:
For the Employers
:
None
For the workman
:
None
State : Jharkhand
Industry : Coal
Dated- 16.11.2017
AWARD
By order No. L-20012/400/1996-IR(C-I) dated 31.12.1997 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour
has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub–section (1) and sub-section (2A) of section 10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of Govindpur Area of M/s. BCCL in dismissing Sh. Baldeo
Das, Miner/Loader w.e.f. 06/08/1993 is justified? If not, to what relief is the concerned workman
entitled?”
2.
After receipt of the reference, both parties are noticed. But appearing for certain dates none appears
subsequently. Case remains pending. It is felt that the disputes between the parties have been resolved in the meantime.
Hence No Dispute Award is passed. Communicate.
R. K. SARAN, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 9 tuojh] 2018
dk-vk- 85-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ ch-lh-
lh-,y- ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- 1] /uckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 25@2010) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 29-12-2017
dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&20012@101@2009&vkbZvkj (lh,e&I)º
,e- ds- flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 9th January, 2018
S.O. 85.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1,
Dhanbad (Ref. No. 25 of 2010) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to
the management of M/s. BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 29.12.2017.
[No. L-20012/101/2009-IR (CM-I)]
M. K. SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 1, DHANBAD
In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D. Act, 1947
Reference No. 25 of 2010
Employer in relation to the management of C.V. Area of M/s. BCCL
218
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
AND
Their workman
Present : Shri R. K. Saran, Presiding Officer
Appearances:
For the Employers
:
Shri S.N.Ghosh, Advocate
For the workman
:
Shri R.R. Ram, Rep.
State : Jharkhand
Industry : Coal
Dated- 6.12.2017
AWARD
By order No.-L-20012/101/2009 IR-(CM-I), dated.19.02.2010 the Central Govt. in the Ministry of Labour has,
in exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub–Section (1) and Sub-Section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act.1947, referred the following disputes for adjudication to this Tribunal:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of Basantimata Colliery under C.V.Area of M/s. BCCL in
dismissing Shri Khiru Bhuia UG Loader from the service of the company is justified and legal? To
what relief is the workman concerned entitled ?”
2.
The case is received from the Ministry of Labour on 08.03.2010. After receipt of reference , both parties are
noticed, but after long delay the Sponsoring Union files their written statement on 15.05.2017. And the management
files their written statement -cum-rejoinder on 03.08.2017. The point involved in the reference is that the workman has
been dismissed from his services on 12.08.2005.
3.
During preliminary hearing of this case, domestic enquiry held by the management is accepted by the
Sponsoring Union/workman as Fair & Proper .
4.
The point involved in the reference is that the workman has been dismissed from his services on the ground of
long absence. But he has already out of service since last 12 years. It is felt to give another chance to the workman
concerned to serve.
5.
Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, I hold that he be taken into job as a fresh employee in cat-I.
But the workman be kept under probation for a period of two year. Therefore the question of back wages does not arise
at all.
This is my award.
R. K. SARAN, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 9 tuojh] 2018
dk-vk- 86-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ ch-lh-
lh-,y- ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- 2] /uckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 30@2016) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 11-12-2017
dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&20012@164@2015&vkbZvkj (lh,e&I)º
,e- ds- flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 9th January, 2018
S.O. 86.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 2,
Dhanbad (Ref. No. 30 of 2016) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to
the management of M/s. BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 11.12.2017.
[No. L-20012/164/2015-IR (CM-I)]
M. K. SINGH, Section Officer
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
219
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO.2), AT DHANBAD
PRESENT : Shri R.K.Saran, Presiding Officer
In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1) (d) of the I.D. Act, 1947
REFERENCE No. 30 OF 2016
PARTIES
:
The Secretary,
Janta Mazdoor Sangh,
Old Rajagarh, Bakri Hat,, PO: Jharia,: Dhanbad-828111
Vs.
The General Manager,
Kusunda Area of M/s. BCCL,
P.O. Kusunda,, Distt: Dhanbad.828116.
Order No. L-20012/164/2015-IR(CM-I) dt. 10.02.2016
APPEARANCES
:
On behalf of the workman/Union
:
Mr.Vivek Kumar Ld. Representative
n behalf of the Management
:
Mr.Gopal Tiwari Management Representative
State : Jharkhand
Industry : Coal
Dated, Dhanbad, the 27th October, 2017
AWARD
The Government of India, Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Sec.10(1)(d)
of the I.D. Act.,1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No.L-
20012/164/2015-IR(CM-I) dt. 10.02.2016.
SCHEDULE
Whether the action of the Management of Burragarh Colliery under P.B. Area of M/s BCCL in
dismissing Sri Chandradeo, M/Loader vide letter dated 27.12.2002 is fair and justified? To what relief
the concerned workman is entitled to
On receipt of the Order No. L-20012/164/2015-IR(CM-I) dt. 10.02.2016 mentioned reference from the
Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment, New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, the Reference
Case No. 30 of 2016 was registered on 04.03.2016 and accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue notices
through the Registered Posts to the parties concerned, directing them to appear in the Court on the date fixed, and to
file their written statements along with the relevant documents. In pursuance of the said order, notices by the Registered
Posts were sent to the parties concerned.
Both the parties made their appearances and filed their pleadings and photocopies of their documents. The
Union and the O.P./Management through their own Representatives respectively appeared, and contested the case to
the extent the case was reserved for Award.
2.
This Reference case of all about of workman Sri Chndadeo Singh a permanent employee of Burragarh Colliery
under P.B. Area of M/s. BCCL being his Pers. No 02983146 was posted as M/Loader in the Colliery. The workman
had been successful in keeping his unblemished service track record, very sincere and efficient in the Company till he
had proceeded his native place on some emergence work since 03.01.2002 with prior information from the
Management .After having returned from the native place when he went to join duty the Management abruptly came
out the dismissal letter and handed it over to the workman citing unauthorized absence as reason behind it. Though
prior to dismissal, there was no knowledge the workman had about any charge sheet and the enquiry notices
whatsoever ever sent to the delinquent workman but the alleged order/ Notices itself contained all about at lengths,
he came across with dismissal letter. As per the principle of the natural justice equal opportunity is a pre-requisite
condition to be provided to the delinquent workman against whom an enquiry is being constituted ,so long as Shri
Chandradeo Singh, no such proceedings had been followed as stated in WS. Whereas it is a well settled law that
before dismissal of anybody the enquiry proceedings as well as notice of enquiry should be made available to the
charge sheeted workman, but in this case the Management neither did supply the enquiry proceedings nor did publish
the enquiry in local daily which is mandatory. As workers are worst hit of all, though there is absolute unanimity on
220
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
the move doubting dismissal being beneficial in the long run to Industrial Relations so the dismissal for committing
petty misconduct had shockingly a serious blow and disproportionate . The workman was worst hit being rubbed off his
livelihood in days of hardship. The Management of P.B. Area in bluntly violating the rules & regulations and the
principle of the Natural justice dismissed the workman Chandradeo Singh so the alleged act of the dismissal is
unlawful unfair and unjustified and thus is liable to be set aside ,as stated in WS.
3.
Whereas categorically denying all the allegations brought in by the Sponsoring Union/petitioner, the
Management argued by raising question over maintainability of Industrial Dispute either in law and facts as neither
the Sponsoring Union nor the workman never came up during these long span of time, i.e. thirteen years ,with any
explanations of maintaining deep rooted silence and, on that score the Reference does not qualify to stand as Industrial
Dispute rather liable to be rejected. Management further asserted that the workman concerned started absenting from
duty since 03.01.2002 unuthorizedly Since the aforesaid conduct of the workman was a misconduct under clause
26.1.1 of the Certified Standing Order of the Management thereby he deserved for alleged charge-sheet issued on
17.1.2002. Against which the workman submitted his reply which did not found satisfactory at all prompting
Management of setting up an Enquiry Committee under Enquiry Officer Sri B.R.Shukla the then Sr. Personnel
Officer as Enquiry Officer to conduct the enquiry in accordance with principle of natural justice and to ascertain to the
extent the workman committed misconduct, and to offer ample opportunity to the charge sheeted workman to defend
himself but deliberately evading for appearance turned the enquiry to declare ex-parte. The findings of the said
enquiry were also sent to the workman on his home address by Registered post. It is an extreme example of gross
negligence on the part of the workman who later on turned habitual absentee that got rooted leading to his dismissal
from service.
Since the workman concerned kept on indulging himself in absentism and turned it into habitual practice with
no sign of abating in spite of full force with which the Management did its best not to let the efforts go in vain by
slapping with stoppage of one SPRA in earlier occasion also on the same ground before resumption of duty. Thus,
neither there was any short of violation of the principle of natural justice, nor did it get mired at any stage as alleged by
the petitioner/Union rather the alleged action of dismissal against the workman stands as fair, legal and justified.
4.
So long as in relation to Group of the Collieries under the Management of M/s BCCL, a part of the Coal India
Ltd., cases like this seldom get significant where numerous cases on same footing might have been pouring in slowly
but steadily and the matter never gets more complicated when the labour forces are involved . Moreover this is not a
case of day one or two and has turned a regular feature for the years together because they are sometimes subjected to
work beyond safety norms. The workmen mostly belonging to illiteracy back ground are usually scared of stepping
into the underground Mines due to safety hazards and unhealthy conditions, surrendering in and around the site despite
best of safety mechanism/technique in place, However safety related issues have never carved out a permanent niche in
the hearts of workers. The Management and its set ups associated in such matter presents an added dimensions and
have practice to ignore the move of the such loopholes vulnerable on slightest safety omissions. Workers of the
colliery have early adopted safety norms and other safety platforms since they are simple, clean and accurate.
Governments too have made every effort to stem usage of safety norms of latest technology in collaboration with their
leading Institutions in a bid to facilitate accident free zone and to thwart accident or mishap.
There is nothing adverse report against the workman barring this one. Though alleged absentism had cost him
employment. The punishment of dismissal imposed to the misconduct against the workman shielding under the name
of penalty on ground of absentism appears to be disproportionate and a harsher to bear, and what needs above all, a
fresh outlook in view of easing out of strain in Industrial relationship.
5.
The workman concerned who was stripped of his livelihood, needs a little with breather, be provided one more
opportunity by offering him fresh appointment in the lowest Grade with two- year probation. Therefore it is ordered
that the worker concerned be appointed as fresher in the lowest Cat-I with two-year period on probation by detecting
his actual date of birth with the Service Excerpt of the Colliery before providing employment, So long as back wages,
it does not arise at all .
R. K. SARAN, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 9 tuojh] 2018
dk-vk- -—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ fVLdks
fyfeVsM ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- 1] /uckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 53@1997) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 08-01-2018
dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&20012@476@1995&vkbZvkj (lh&I)º
,e- ds- flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
221
New Delhi, the 9th January, 2018
S.O. 87.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1,
Dhanbad (Ref. No. 53 of 1997) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to
the management of M/s. TISCO Ltd. and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on
08.01.2018.
[No. L-20012/476/1995-IR (C-I)]
M. K. SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 1, DHANBAD
In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D. Act, 1947
Reference : No. 53/1997
Employer in relation to the management of M/s. TISCO
AND
Their workman
Present : Shri R. K. Saran, Presiding Officer
Appearances:
For the Employers
:
Shri D.K. Verma, Advocate
For the workman
:
None
State : Jharkhand
Industry : Coal
Dated- 15/11/2017
AWARD
By order No. L-20012/476/1995-IR(C-I) dated 11/02/1997 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour
has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub –section (1) and sub-section (2A) of section 10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of M/S. TISCO in denial of employment to the dependent of
workman Shri Basudeo Turi, SDL Crew, 6 &7 Pits Colliery is justified? If not, to what relief is the
concerned workman entitled?
2.
After receipt of the reference, both parties are noticed. But appearing for certain dates by the workman none
appears subsequently. Case remains pending. It is felt that the disputes between the parties have been resolved in the
meantime. Hence No Dispute Award is passed. Communicate.
R. K. SARAN, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 9 tuojh] 2018
dk-vk- 88-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ-lh-
,y- ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- 1] /uckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 66@1992) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 29-12-2017
dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&20012@225@1991&vkbZvkj (lhe&I)º
,e- ds- flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 9th January, 2018
S.O. 88.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1,
222
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Dhanbad (Ref. No. 66 of 1992) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to
the management of M/s. ECL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 29.12.2017.
[No. L-20012/225/1991-IR (CM-I)]
M. K. SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 1, DHANBAD
In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D. Act, 1947
Reference : No. 66/1992
Employer in relation to the management of Kapasara Area of M/s. ECL
AND
Their workmen
Present : Shri R. K. Saran, Presiding Officer
Appearances:
For the Employers
:
Shri D.K. Verma, Advocate
For the workman
:
Shri D. Mukherjee, Advocate
State : Jharkhand
Industry : Coal
Dated- 4/12/2017
AWARD
By order no . L- 20012 /225/1991 /IR (CM-1) dated 06/ 08/1992, the Central Government in the Ministry of
Labour has in exercise of the power conferred by clause (d) of sub – section ( 1) and sub – section ( 2A) of section 10
of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :
SCHEDULE
“Whether the demand of Colliery Mazdoor Sabha of India that S/Shri Radhashyam Banerjee and
others 174 being the contract Labour are required to be regularised by the Eastern Coalfields Ltd in
their establishment as well as these workers are also entitled for the benefits of NCWA-IV is justified? If
not, to what relief the workmen concerned are entitled?”
ANNEXURE
List of workmen
1. Sri Radha Shyam Banerjee
2. Sri Sanat Kumar Das
3. Sri Babesh Chandra
4. Bhubneshwar Saw
5. Dhaneshwar Saw
6. Seo Prasad Saw
7. Raj Kumar Saw
8. Brahma Murari Mahato
9. Janta Pd. Ram
10. Sukumar Das
11. Ashok Kumar
12. Balai Chakraborty
13. Sh. Niranjan Ruj
14. Utpal Rai
15. Sukant Chatterjee
16. Kanai Lal Bandopadhyay
17. Uttam Kr. Chattopadhyay
18. Jaidev Chatterjee
19. Nirmal Bhattcharjee
20. Kartik Choudhary
21. Nirmal Chtterjee
22. Hital Nag
23. Dipankar Ghosh
24. Ashim Mallick
25. Rajesh Srivastav
26. Prayag Paswan
27. Goutam Banerjee
28. Asit Chatterjee
29. Rajnath Ram
30. Alok Kr. Chakravorty
31. Asim Chakravorty
32. Ram Krishna Bhattcharjee
33. Krishna Chandra Mukherjee
34. Yusuf Hasan
35. Tapas Chandra Ghoshal
36. Tapan Kumar Mukherjee
37. Pritish Chakravorty
38. Salim Kr. Ghoshal
39. Khoku/Murli Ram Bouri
40. Satish Choudhary
41. B. Madhushudan
42. Pramod Choudhary
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
223
43. Anil Kumar
44. Parmeshwar
45. Basant Chakravorty
46. Suresh Chatterjee
47. Sish Kumar
48. Gopal Bhandari
49. Ganpat Mahto
50. Basim Murtin
51. Tapan Kr. Dutta
52. Durga Karmakar
53. Raj Kumar Lohar
54. Ranjit Lohar
55. Basudeo Mandal
56. Basant Kr. Mondal
57. Mukul Mondal
58. Subhendu Mondal
59. Rohit Kr. Mondal
60. Subhash Mondal
61. Dasrath Chandra
62. Basant Kr. Das
63. Dilip Kr. Mahato
64. Anadi Prasad Mistri
65. Ramashish Prasad
66. Krishnandu Chatterjee
67. Kajal Kr. Dey
68. Alok Banerjee
69. Kalyan Kumar Ghosal
70. Ashok Kr. Ganguly
71. Pradip Chakraborty
72. Sandip Chakraborty
73. Partha Banerjee
74. Dulal Chatterjee
75. Harsha Mazumdar
76.Ashok Kr. Chakraborty
77. Jagbandhu Banerjee
78. Dilip Kr. Roy
79. Hari Krishna Dey
80. Ravindra Nath Saha
81. Ajay Kr. Jha
82. Ashok Kr. Singh
83. Madhai Rawani
84. Bhabhotosh Bouri
85. Somnath Mukherjee
86. Probir Kumar
87. Kartik ch. Bandhopadhyay
88. Tarak Nath Chattopadhyay
89. Gunomoy Bandhopadhyay
90. Surya Roy
91. Ajit Kumar Sinha
92. Ranjit Lohar
93. Dhiren Roy
94. Anjay roy
95. Naresh Pd. Saw
96. Ganesh Chandra Gourai
97. Sasti Badyakar
98. Ashish Chandra Mallick
99. Mirinmoy Saha
100. Sadhan Pal
101. Saffiuddin Ansari
102. Subhamay Chakarvorty
103. Arvind Kumar Rawani
104. Sanjay Kr. Das Gupta
105.Parmanand Nayak
106. Pradut Kumar Das
107. Md. Salim Ansari
108. Md. Kalim Ansari
109. Mohammad Allauddin
110. Mohammed Halim Ansari
111. Subhash Kr. Dutta
112. Birendra Kr. Singh
113. Anil Kr. Singh
114. Sudam Prasad Singh
115. Ram Sanmukh singh
116. Sudhir Kr. Singh
117. Randhir Kr. Singh
118. Triloki Pandey
119. Rajiv Kumar
120. Ranjit Kr. Dutta
121. Prakash Mitra
122. Anup Mitra
123. Asit Mondal
124. Siddhanath Nirala
125. Swapan Chakravorty
126. Addyamay Dasgupta
127. Bishwanath Dasgupta
128. Madhu Bakshi
129. Salim Ansari
130. Rakesh Kr. Sinha
131. Shital Chandra Ganguly
132. Rajen Kr. Saw
133. Uday Kr. Saw
134. Suresh Kumar
135. Sadanand Bouri
136. Dip Narayan Bouri
137. Basudeo Mondal
138. Janardan Kumar
139. Narendra Pd. Singh
140. R. B. Barat
141. Ashok Kr. Singh
142. Dipak Kumar
143. Baijnath Prasad
144. Ajit Kumar Singh
145. Surendra Kr. Singh
146. Algu Ram
147. Surendra Kr. Singh
148. Manoj Kr. Singh
149. Indu Bhushan Singh
150 Rabi Shankar singh
151. Kamleshwar Upadhayay
152. Binay Kr. Singh
153. Narendra Singh
154. Ajay Singh
155. Sant lal Choudhary
156. Sunil Kr. Singh
157. Prakash Chandra Singh
158. Raj Kumar Singh
159. Ranjit Singh
160. Nagendra Pd. Singh
161. Jitendra Kumar Singh
162. Binay Kr. Upadhayay
224
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
163. Manoj Kr. Singh
164. Kailash Singh
165. Surendra Ram
166. Buchkum Singh
167. Shiv Nath Banerjee
168. Gopal Singh
169. Asim Banerjee
170. Dinesh Yadav
171. . Bijay Manjhi
172. Himanshu Chakraborty
173. Shyam Sundar Roy
174. Manas Mukherjee
175. Manas Chandra Gorai
2.
The case is received from Ministry of Labour on 12.08.1992. The Sponsoring Union files their written statement
on 01.10.1992. But after long delay the management files their written statement on 23.02.2000. Thereafter rejoinder
and document filed by the parties. Three witnesses examined on behalf of the Sponsoring Union as well as two witness
examined on behalf of the management. Documents of the management marked as M-1 to M-1/2 but no document
marked by the workman.
3.
The case of the Sponsoring Union is that the management of Kapasara Area of M/S ECL which is a public
Sector Enterprises have employed contract labour in their works for raising of Coal and overburden removal of earth
cutting, stone cutting and loading and unloading through hired heavy earth moving machineries are deployed through
the above contract Labour.
4.
It is further submitted by the Sponsoring Union is that the above action of the management of Kapasara Area of
M/S BCCL in their deployment of their workmen as contract Labour is a cloak for supressing the facts that these
workmen under contract Labour were really the workmen of the management concerned. In order to deprive them
from the status of direct employment of the management and thereby to deny them the proper wages as stipulated and
prescribed for them in the NCWA- III & IV.
5.
It is further submitted by the sponsoring union that since these workmen under the said contract labour were
receiving less wages even than an unskilled workman on the muster Roll of the management, and they were not having
paid any other benefits and emenities like provident fund, Gratuity, bonus, Privilage leave etc, they made regular
representation for their regularisation as the direct workmen of the said management which were of no avail. The union
also took up the case of these workmen for their regularisation as direct workman of the said management in
consideration of their continous employments as such so that they could get even the minium wages as prescribed for
similar nature of jobs performed by the regular workmen on the muster roll of the management. To which the
management turned a deaf ear.
6.
On the other hand the case of the management is that there is no valid Industrial dispute in the present case in
the eye of law or within the meaning of section 2 K of the I.D Act. The said persons do not come under the defination
of sec 2 (K) of I.D.Act . As a matter of fact there is no dispute and the same is fit to be dismissed. As the reference
order is vauge and suffers from the vice of total non application of mind by the Govt. and it is therefore vitiated the
particulars of the persons & details thereof are also lacking . A vague reference order is no reference order and is
rendered null & void.
7.
It is further submits that the management specifically clerarly and categorically states and submits that none of
the persons named in the list have ever been engaged by the management.
8.
It is stated by the management that the persons allotted work through open tender to supply such small number
of persons for a timited period to meet the exigency of work. It is respectfully submitted that the persons who supplies
such persons for a limited period is paid agreed amount of the work. The method of recruitment, the conditions of
service , the scale of pay & conduct Rules regulating the service conditions are governed by the statutes laid down
therein . It is settled principle of law that the employees of the management are workmen under the I.D Act.
9.
It is further submitted by the management that the petitioner have wrongly stated that the persons working under
the contract system are required to work under the management. And the management has its own regular employee
and the work through the contractor is taken casually whenever required & the same is not continuous.
10.
It is further submitted by the management that it is wholly based on misrepresentation and it represent
deliberate bid to exploit this organisation and to induct into employment illegally some outsiders through back door
method. Such prayer is also without any substance or merit quit apart from inherent legal and infirmities in the
reference order itself. The prayer of the so-called union is therefore lable to be rejected.
11.
This is the case of regularisation of 175 workmen . The case of the workmen is that they were engaged under the
management, as coal cutter in the mines. Through contractor.
12.
The dispute of regularisation was raised, more than twentyfive years ago. During that time, reference received
written statement and counter filed. Evidence of the parties also recorded long back. Purused the evidence, the
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
225
workman stated that they were contract worker under Khalsa Brothers.But the contractor has not been examined in the
case nor the contractor identified any of the workmen.
13.
In the meantime 25 years or more elapsed. It is not known as to how many workmen now alive and how many
persons crossed the age of 60 years i.e the age of superannuation. As per evidence of WW-1 he say that he was
working from 1982. In 1995 the witness of WW-2 Sri Asim Kr. Banerjee is 41 years old it means now he was 63 years
old.
14.
On purusal of the case it is found that No Identity Card, age proof, Pay slip etc filed in this case. Since the
concerned workman are not identified at this stage, this Tribunal constrained to pass award infavour of the workman.
Therefore the Tribunal is not in a position to regularise the workmen due to want of identification of the workmen.
Upon this one judgment of constitution Bench of Hon’ble Supreme Court rendered in case of SAIL- Vs National
Union Waterfront Workers reported in (2001) 7 SCC-1 says that the engagement of the contractor in the instant
work was not prohibited category of work.
15.
Considering the facts and circumstance of this case, I hold that the demand of Colliery Mazdoor Sabha of
India that S/Shri Radhashyam Banderjee and others 174 being the contract Labour are required to be regularised by the
Eastern Coalfields Ltd in their establishment as well as these workers are also entitled for the benefits of NCWA-IV is
not justified. Hence they were not entitled to get any relief.
This is my award.
R. K. SARAN, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 9 tuojh] 2018
dk-vk- 89-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ bafM;u
,;jykbal ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- 1] fnYyh ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 275@2011) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 21-12-2017
dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&11012@59@2000&vkbZvkj (lh&I)º
,e- ds- flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 9th January, 2018
S.O. 89.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1, New
Delhi (Ref. No. 275 of 2011) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to
the management of M/s. Indian Airlines and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on
21.12.2017.
[No. L-11012/59/2000-IR (C-I)]
M. K. SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE PRESIDING OFFICER: CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR
COURT No. 1: ROOM No. 511, DWARKA COURT COMPLEX, SECTOR 10, DWARKA, DELHI – 110 075
ID No. 275/2011
Smt. Kulbir Bedi,
59/124, Ajit Nagar, VIP Road,
Agra, Uttar Pradesh 282 001
…Workman
Versus
The General Manager (IR),
Indian Airlines .
IGI Airport,
New Delhi
…Management
226
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
AWARD
In the present case a reference was received vide letter No.L.11012/59/2000 (C-I) dated 29.08.2000 under
clause (d) of sub-section (1) and Section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (in short the Act) for
adjudication of an industrial disputes, terms of which are as under:
Whether the action of the management of Indian Airlines, Northern Region, New Delhi in terminating the
services of Mrs. Kulbir Bedi, Air Hostess with effect from 07.02.1995 is legal and justified? If not, to what
relief is the workman entitled?
2.
Thereafter, a corrigendum was received vide letter No.11012/59/2000-IR(C-I) dated 19.01.2015, wherein the
date of termination of the workman was to be read as ‘12.03.1996’ instead of ‘07.02.1995’.
3.
Brief facts giving rise to the present case are that Smt. Kulbir Bedi (hereinafter referred to as the claimant) was
appointed as Air Hostess with Indian Airlines (hereinafter referred to as the management ) with effect from 01.11.1976.
She has been discharging her duties sincerely and diligently and there was no complaint against her at any time and the
claimant had not availed any kind of leave except as authorized under the law and never remained absent from her
duties in an unauthorized manner.
4.
It is alleged in para 3 of the statement of claim that she fell sick on 06.09.1993 and was examined by panel
doctor of the management. She was advised complete bed rest by the doctor and intimation in this regard was sent by
way of an application, alongwith the medical certificate, to the Operations department of the management, in which the
claimant was working. Her salary was later on sanctioned by the management. The claimant was advised further
medical rest and she from to time sent requisite applications supported by medical certificates for sanction of her leave
but the management did not convey any sanction of leave for reasons best known to them despite the fact that medical
certificate was also furnished to the management. It is further alleged that on 27.02.1994 the aged mother of the
claimant who was living with her expired and the claimant was under a social obligation to perform her last rites.
When the claimant was declared fit, she reported for duties in 1994 but was not allowed to join duties on the pretest
that some disciplinary proceedings were being initiated against her. No show cause notice or memo was served on her.
She again on 07.02.1995 reported for duties but she was intimated that her services have been terminated and an
attempt was also made to hand over a cheque of Rs.7439.55 towards the alleged dues, which were not received by the
claimant earlier. No letter of termination of service was served upon the claimant. Thereafter the claimant made a
representation to the various authorities. She was highly mentally disturbed and due to family circumstances there was
nobody to look after her small children.
5.
Thereafter, claimant received a notice from National Industrial Tribunal regarding approval of her application
NTB 16 of 96 dated 05.06.1996. The claimant also filed reply to the said application under Section 33-2 of the Act and
she has objected for grant of approval of the said application of the management. However, the Tribunal vide letter
order dated 04.11.1996 while granting approval to the application of the management also permitted the claimant to
raise appropriate industrial dispute before the appropriate authority. Thereafter, she represented to the management and
conciliation also took place between the parties which virtually failed and finally reference was received in the manner
stated above from the appropriate Government for adjudication of the present dispute.
6.
Claim was contested by the management who filed reply thereto wherein certain preliminary objections was
taken. However, it was admitted that the claimant herein was removed from service vide memo dated 12.03.1996 and
appropriate Government has made reference presuming termination of the claimant from service with effect from
07.02.1995. The claimant was absent from duties with effect from 06.05.1993 on the pretext of being sick and on
06.09.1993, as stated in the statement of claimant. However, she did not get any leave sanctioned in accordance with
the relevant rules and regulations and thereafter her absence from duty which was irregular and without any sufficient
explanation was treated as misconduct. She has filed fake medical certificates. She was also asked by the management
to appear before the medical officer of the management but she did not comply with the directions. She was also
charge sheeted in terms of charge sheet dated 22.12.1993/10.01.1994 Ex.MW5/12. Claimant has not sent any reply to
the charge sheet nor participate in the domestic enquiry. Thereafter, ex-parte enquiry was conducted against the
claimant. Claimant was duly informed vide memo dated 29.07.1993 that the medical certificate furnished by here has
not been accepted by the management. Resultantly, on the basis of enquiry conducted by the Enquiry Officer, claimant
herein was removed from service and a cheque of Rs.7439.55 pertaining to her past arrears/dues was handed over to
her.
7.
Vide letter no.Z-22019/6/2007-IR-(C-II) dated 22.12.2008, the case was transferred to CGIT cum Labour Court
No.II, New Delhi for adjudication. Again vide order No.Z-22019/6/2007-IR(C-II) dated 30.03.2010 transferred the
case back to this Tribunal for adjudication.
8.
Against this factual background, my learned predecessor vide order dated 13.04.2009, framed the following
preliminary issue:
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
227
‘Whether the enquiry conducted by the management is just, fair and legal?’. If not, what orders have to be
passed in the case?’
9.
Record also shows that additional issues were also framed on 08.09.2011, as under:
(i)
Whether punishment dismissal commensurate to the misconduct of the claimant?
(ii)
In terms of reference
(iii)
Relief
10.
Both parties adduced evidence on the preliminary issue and it is clear from the record that this Tribunal vide
order dated 07.02.2013 held that the enquiry conducted by the management is not legal and fair and the same is in
violation of principles of natural justice. It was also observed that the documents filed by the management have also
not been proved during the enquiry before this Tribunal. Resultantly, this issue was decided in favour of the claimant
and against the management.
11.
Thereafter opportunity was granted to the management to adduce evidence afresh on the charge
sheet/misconduct committed by the claimant. Thereafter, management examined Ms.Prabha Devi, Dr. Kirti Suri
Verma and Shri Rajesh Seth, whose affidavits are Ex.MW3/A, Ex.MW4/A and Ex.MW5/A respectively. All these
witnesses have tendered in evidence various documents and I would be referring to these documents while drawing my
conclusions. Claimant in order to rebut the case of the management examined herself as WW1 whose affidavit is
Ex.WW1/B and also tendered in evidence certain documents.
Finding of Additional Issue No. (i), (ii) and (iii)
12.
All these issues are being taken up together for the purpose of discussion as they are interrelated and can be
conveniently disposed of. Before I proceed to consider the comparative merits of the submissions made on behalf of
either of the parties, it is necessary to delineate the charges mentioned in the charge sheet Ex.MW5/12 (also marked as
Ex.MW1/1) and the same is as under:
‘You reported sick on 06.05.1993 and since then you have neither reported back for duties nor sent any
intimation in regard to your sickness. You were advised by OM vide his letters dated 12.07.1993 and
29.07.1993 to report back for duties and advised to see the IA Medical Officer which you failed to do so. You
were also advised by IM’s letters dated 12.09.1993 and 06.10.1993 that medical certificates submitted by you
have not been accepted by our IA Medical officer, therefore, advised to see the IA Medical Officer, failing
which disciplinary action will be initiated against you. However, you failed to do so.
You are, therefore, absenting unauthorizedly with effect from 06.05.1993.
The above, if proved, would constitute an act of misconduct under the Standing Orders applicable to you, such
as:
Clause 16(6)
Absence without leave for more than 8 consecutive days or overstaying the sanctioned leave
without sufficient grounds or proper or satisfactory explanation within a week from the date
of termination of leave sanctioned.
Clause 16(8)
Breach of any Standing Order or any law or rules applicable to the establishment.
13.
Evidence of the management regarding proof of misconduct is testimony of MW3 and that of MW5. It is clear
from the overall examination of the charge sheet that the case of the management is primarily is based upon the
allegation that the claimant herein has remained absent from duties without any sanction of leave and the so called
medical certificates filed by the claimant as proof of hier illness were fake documents so as to avail leave. Admittedly
onus of proof of unauthorized absence of the claimant from duties is upon the management who is required to adduce
cogent and reliable evidence to prove the said charges against the claimant who has also furnished various documents
in the form of applications as well as medical certificates so as to show that she was really suffering from illness.
14.
It is further clear that the claimant has reported sick on 06.09.1993 and case of the management is that no
intimation was sent by the claimant to the management regarding her sickness and she was asked vide letter dated
12.07.1993 and 19.07.1994 to report back for duties. However, she has submitted medical certificate which were not
accepted by the medical officer of the management.
15.
It is also necessary to point out here that when domestic enquiry has been held by the Tribunal to be unfair and
against the principles of natural justice, in that eventuality management is required to adduce fresh evidence so as to
prove charges of misconduct against an employee. Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Neeta Kaplish vs. Presiding
Officer (1999) Lab.IC 44 while considering the question of power of Labour Court to permit adducing fresh evidence
held that under section 11-A of the Act when opportunity has been availed by the management to adduce evidence on
228
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
the charges of misconduct made against an employee, in that eventuality, evidence recorded during the course of
domestic enquiry or record pertaining to domestic enquiry would not constitute fresh evidence as all these documents
have been found by the labour court to be defective and such record would also not constitute ‘material on record
within the meaning of Section 11A of the Act as the enquiry proceedings have now been ignored altogether.
16.
Management examined Ms.Prabha Rani as MW3 who has stated that she was working in the Operations
Department where the claimant was earlier serving from 1993 to 96. She was working as Deputy Chief Airhostess
with the management and the claimant Ms.Kulbir Bedi was working under her supervision. She has also conversant
with the signature and handwriting of the claimant. She is not aware as to who was the Operations Manager in the year
1993 and she is not competent to recommend disciplinary action against the claimant. She has further deposed that
airhostesses have to report for duties as and when she has to fly and she had to remain standby at her residence also as
in case of emergency she may be called for duties. She has deposed that the claimant has submitted leave application in
1993 and her leave record for the year 1993 was in her possession, copy of which is Ex.MW3/W1. As per this
document, claimant remained on sick leave for the period 06.05.1993 to 30.09.1995. She has further deposed to a court
question that no leave in the period mentioned above was sanctioned in favour of the claimant , as such, she was on
unauthorized absence. However, she has clarified that the claimant has been sending leave applications supported by
medical certificates. Management has also doctors who attended to the employees, but she did not recollect whether
Dr. Aruna Chaudhary was one of such doctors on the panel of the management. She has further stated in her cross
examination that here medical certificate was considered by the management and her medical certificate was
considered by the management and her leave application was refused. However, she had not brought the record
pertaining to refusal of the leave application of the relevant period for the year 1992 to 1994 as well as list of panel of
doctors. She has further clarified that she is not aware as to how letter Ex.MW3/13 was sent to the claimant as matter
is more than 20 years old. She has denied Ex.ME3/2 to Ex.MW3/7 are fabricated documents. Ex.MW3/2 is letter dated
07.05.1993 written by Manager Operations and copy of the same is alleged to have been sent to Ms.Kulbir Bedi, the
claimant herein. Similarly Ex.MW3/5 dated 26.08.1993 is written by Operations Manager to Operations IANR(D)
which contains details of medical certificates sent by the claimant to the management. This letter again shows that the
medical certificate in fact was sent by the claimant regarding her illness in the year 1993 to the management.
Otherwise, there would not have been such specific mention of the same in this letter. Ex.MW3/6 is also regarding
medical certificate in respect of claimant Ms.Kulbir Bedi and the same is issued by Dr. Aruna Chaudhary. This again
shows that the claimant was sick from September 93 to 18.09.1993. There is another document Ex.MW3/7 filed by the
management regarding fitness of the claimant.
17.
MW4 Ms.Kirti Suri Verma was Senior Manager during the year 1992-95 in Indian Airlines. She has tried to
prove various documents issued under her signatures. She has admitted that there were more than 100 doctors on the
panel meant for treatment of regular employees and employees were supposed to visit the doctors on the panel for the
treatment. However, she was not in a position to produce the panel of doctors of the relevant period who were
engaged for the medical examination of the regular employees. She has clarified that Dr. Aruna Chaudhary was not
competent for long term treatment. However, she has competent to treat for short term treatment . The witness has not
shown any document as to how Dr. Aruna Chaudhary was not competent and empanelled to provide long term
treatment for ailments. She was also given time by the court to produce original of specialized doctors for treatment of
its regular employees who are suffering from such illness. However, she was not in a position to produce any record.
She has admitted that the claimant never appeared before her. She has made remarks on the backside of the medical
certificate Ex.MW4/W1 who appeared before her. She is also not aware whether the department has sent this
communication to the claimant or not as the doctors do not directly deal with the employees. She further could not
recall whether after 02.02.1993 she examined the medical certificates of the claimant or not. The claimant was
informed to report as per submission of this witness vide Ex.MW3/3. However, she has admitted that Ex.MW3/3 does
not mention that her medical certificates have been rejected for want of supporting documents. Moreover, evidence on
record regarding this communication was not sent to the claimant by the management.
18.
MW5 Shri Sanjiv Seth has also tried to support the case of the management. His deposition is broadly based on
official record. He has admitted that Ex.MW1/1 letter Ex.MW5/5, Ex,MW3/6, letter Ex.MW5/7 and Ex.MW5/6 were
never sent to the claimant. He has further deposed that Ex.MW5/4 was not sent through post to the claimant and the
same was placed in the pigeon hole/locker. He further admitted that the claimant was on sick leave with effect from
07.05.1993. A bare perusal of Ex.MW5/4 would show that Operations Manager has clearly mentioned that period of
sick leave from 29.11.1992 to 06.01.1993 and 05.10.1993 to 23.11.1993 to be treated as leave on loss of pay.
However, it is clear from the testimony of this witness that these letters were never sent/conveyed to the claimant. It is
further clear from the statement of Shri Seth MW5 that there is no proof of dispath of any of the letters mentioned
above and competent authority in respect of the claimant herein was Operations Management, as is clear from
Standing Orders Ex,MW5/16. He also stated that Ex.MW5/9 that the claimant Ms.Kulbir Bedi has signed the medical
certificate issued by Dr.Aruna Chaudhary, Dr.Vijay Verma and Shri Vijay Mehta as proof of her illness. There is
nothing on record to show that the management had rejected the aforesaid medical certificates submitted by the
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
229
claimant to the management as proof of her illness. No communication was sent to the claimant regarding rejection of
these medical certificates by the competent authority, i.e Manager Operations.
19.
At this stage, it is also appropriate to refer to the statement of MW1 Ms.Kulbir Bedi. She has filed a detailed
affidavit Ex.WW1/B in support of the stand taken in her pleadings and she has made reference to the medical
certificates Ex.WW1/1 to Ex/WW1/17. She has clearly deposed that she was on leave from 06.05.1993 to 26.02.1993
when her mother expired. She has also submitted various medical certificates to the management. She has specifically
deposed that she never received Ex.MW5/9. She had communicated to the management in the prescribed form that she
is sick from 06.05.1993. She has also furnished postal receipts regarding sending of medical certificates and other
application when she reported sick and was advised medical rest by the doctors whereas management in the present
case has not proved that any of the communication regarding rejection of her leave was either sent by post or in any
other manner to the claimant. Letter Ex.MW5/5 dated 12.07.1993 was admittedly not sent to the claimant. Similarly,
letter Ex.MW5/10 was also not sent to the claimant. Evidence regarding rejection of leave of the claimant and asking
her to report for duties has not been proved by the management. In such circumstances, it cannot be said that the
claimant was willfully and intentionally absenting from duties or that she was unauthorizedly absent from duties for the
period mentioned above. The court cannot ignore the fact that the claimant has got herself examined by Dr. Aruna
Chaudhary who is a competent doctor and on panel of the management, a fact which was not disputed even during the
course of arguments and she was initially advised rest by her. Management could not cite any rules or regulations or
show any document regarding panel of doctors from whom the claimant was legally required to get herself examined
for long term treatment. Moreover, there is no positive evidence on record tht management has not accepted medical
certificates Ex.MW4/1, Ex.MW4/2, Ex.MW4/3, Ex.MW4/4 and submitted by the claimants as proof of her illness. In
fact, evidence is suggestive of the fact that no communication in this regard was sent to the claimant. Resultantly,
absence of the claimant cannot be said to be willful or unauthorized when as per MW5 Shri Sanjeev Seth, she was on
sick leave with effect from 07.05.1993. Even this was not conveyed to the claimant.
20.
I have also gone through the various authorities relied upon by the management, i.e. Delhi Transport
Corporation Vs. Sardar Singh (AIR (2004) SC 4161). It was a case of long term absence of a conductor who remained
on leave for more than 272 days. Even in the domestic enquiry, he could not adduce any evidence so as to prove the
case of his absence. It was against this background that Hon’ble Apex Court took a view that long term absence of
such an employee is fatal. As such, his removal/dismissal from the job was held to be justified. In the case on hand, as
discussed above, the claimant has admittedly applied for leave and medical certificate was also sent regarding her
ailment by the claimant from time to time, which fact has also been admitted by the management. Moreover,
management has nowhere conveyed to the claimant that her medical certificates have not been accepted. In such
circumstances, there was no occasion for the claimant to be under the impression that she is on leave unauthorizedly,
whereas in the case relied upon by the management, notice was sent to the claimant to join duties, to which he had not
responded. This case relied upon is distinguishable and is not application to the controversy on hand.
21.
Similarly, in the case of Delhi Transport Corporation Vs Narain Singh (MANU/DE/2\4143/2013), the workman
was absent from duties and his absence was treated as leave without pay. However, later on also workman remained on
unauthorized leave for very long period, which showed lack of interest of the workman in the job and he was found to
be a habitual absentee. Workman in the said case even did not participate in the domestic enquiry, which was held ex-
parte against him. Accordingly, he was held guilty of misconduct and order of ‘removal from service’ was passed
against the workman. Since in the above case also, circumstances are clear that the workman, who was a conductor,
remained absent for more than 211 days and he neither filed any reply to the charge sheet nor did he participate in the
domestic enquiry. In such a situation, there was no escape from the conclusion that the workman was guilty.
22.
As a sequel to the above discussion, it is held that the management has failed to prove that the claimant herein
was willfully or unauthorizedly absent for the period mentioned in the charge sheet. As such, she is held to be not
guilty of the misconduct under the law. As a necessary corollary, it is held that the action of the management of Indian
Airlines, Northern Region in terminating the services of Ms.Kulbir Bedi, Air Hostess is totally illegal and unjustified.
The claimant is entitled to full back wages till the date of her retirement, i.e. 31.08.2002 and she is also entitled to all
the consequential benefits to which she was otherwise entitled had she been in the job till the date of her
retirement i.e. 31.08.2012. Further, the claimant would be entitled to all retirral benefits. An award is, accordingly,
passed. Let this award be sent to the appropriate Government, as required under Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947, for publication.
Dated : December 13, 2017
A. C. DOGRA, Presiding Officer
230
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ubZ fnYyh] 10 tuojh] 2018
dk-vk- 90-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ ch-lh-
lh-,y- ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- 2] /uckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 108@2004) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 10-01-2018
dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&20012@96@2004&vkbZ-vkj- (lh&I)º
,e- ds- flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 10th January, 2018
S.O. 90.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 2,
Dhanbad (Ref. No. 108 of 2004) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation
to the management of M/s. BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 10.01.2018.
[No. L-20012/96/2004-IR (C-I)]
M. K. SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO.2), AT DHANBAD
PRESENT : Shri R.K.Saran, Presiding Officer
In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1) (d) of the I.D. Act, 1947.
REFERENCE NO. 108 OF 2004
PARTIES
:
The Vice President,
Janta Mazdoor Sangh,
Dugda Coal Washery,
PO Dugda, Distt: Bokaro-829116
Vs.
The General Manager,
Western Washery Zone of M/s BCCL,
PO: Mahuda, Dhanbad-826001.
Order No. L-20012/96/2004-IR (C-I) dt.02.09.2004.
APPEARANCES
:
On behalf of the workman/Union
:
None
On behalf of the Management
:
Mr D. K.Verma, Ld. Advocate
State : Jharkhand
Industry : Coal
Dated, Dhanbad, the 16th October, 2017
AWARD
The Government of India, Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Sec.10(1)(d)
of the I.D. Act.,1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L-
20012/96/2004-IR (C-I) dt.02.09.2004.
SCHEDULE
Whether the demand of the Janta Mazdoor Sangh from the Management of BCCL, Western Washery Zone to
regularize Sri Hari Narayan Chouhan and Megha Lal Gope as supervisor is fair and proper? If so, to what
relief/benefit are Shri Hari Naryan Chouhan and Megha Lal Gope entitled and from what date?”
2.
Neither the Union Representative nor the workmen concerned are reported to be present on date nor let the
evidence of the workman be completed despite a fresh notice dt 12.09.2017 was sent at the address of the Union
referred in Order of the Reference itself.Mr.D.K.Verma, Ld. Advocate registered his appearance on the date not for this
time but all along since its inception and rolling out as Reference Case .The case is all about denial of the regularization
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
231
to the workmen concerned to the posts of supervisors by the Management seeking reliefs there under by staking
claim.
On perusal and close scrutiny of the case and materials on record, it has been apparently clear that the
Sponsoring Union /workmen seem to be in no hurry to produce the witness to let complete the chapter of evidence of
workman even after having availed more than six adjournments or so .The tardy pace of case over evidence of witness
appears to have paid off its own purpose as it stayed rolling out over status of producing witness since long time back.
The way, the Union Representative /petitioners walk drops points to extract the real conclusion that they are least
interested to get to finality of the case through adjudication rather appear much more inclined only for adjournments
over the times, Simultaneously the Tribunal also do not see violation of the natural justice to let the case be wrapped up
rather rolling over infinity. This also signifies status of the case, as of now, stands crawling over evidence of the
workman since 14.12.2005 with no headway in sight. As such proceedings have abruptly stalled over completion of
evidence of workman. The case appears to have lost its merits On this count, it has been viewed not to be a mute
spectator to let the situation crawl for a long spell of time rather pushing it for final closure in the line of the
principle of natural interest on presumption of non-existent of issue in real sense . So the case is wrapped up as
“No Industrial Dispute “.Accordingly an ‘Award of No Dispute’ is passed.
R. K. SARAN, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 10 tuojh] 2018
dk-vk- 91-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ ch-lh-
lh-,y- ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- 2] /uckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 82@2015) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 10-01-2018
dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&20012@100@2015&vkbZ-vkj- (lh,e&I)º
,e- ds- flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 10th January, 2018
S.O. 91.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 2,
Dhanbad (Ref. No. 82 of 2015) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to
the management of M/s. BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 10.01.2018.
[No. L-20012/100/2015-IR (CM-I)]
M. K. SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO.2), AT DHANBAD
PRESENT : Shri R.K.Saran, Presiding Officer
In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1) (d) of the I.D. Act, 1947.
REFERENCE NO. 82 OF 2015
The Secretary
PARTIES
:
Jharkhnd Janta Mazdoor Union,
Vishwakarma Colony, Nutundih
PO: Jagjivan Nagar, Dhanbad
Vs.
The General Manager,
Western Washery Zone, of M/s BCCL,
PO: Mahuda, Dhanbad.
L-20012/100/2015-IR (CM-I) dt 09.10.2015
APPEARANCES
:
On behalf of the workman/Union
:
Mr. P. Mandal, Ld. Rep.
On behalf of the Management
:
Mr. Ganesh Pd., Ld. Adv.
232
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
State : Jharkhand
Industry : Coal
Dated, Dhanbad, the 25th September, 2017
AWARD
The Government of India, Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Sec.10(1)(d)
of the I.D. Act.,1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L-20012/
100/2015-IR(CM-I) dt 09.10.2015.
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the Management of Western Washery Zone of M/s BCCL in dismissing Sri Somar
Chouhan from the services vide office order dated 7/11.12.1997 is fair and justified? To what relief the
concerned workman is entitled to?’
On receipt of the Order No. L-20012/100/2015-IR(CM-I) dt 09.10.2015 of the above mentioned reference from
the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment, New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, the Reference
Case No. 82 of 2015 was registered on 26.10.2015 and accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue notices
through the Registered Posts to the parties concerned, directing them to appear in the Court on the date fixed, and to
file their written statements along with the relevant documents. In pursuance of the said order, notices by the Registered
Posts were sent to the parties concerned.
Both the parties made their appearances and filed their pleadings and photocopies of their documents. The
Union/Petitioner and the O.P./Management through their own Ld. Representative / Counsel appeared, and contested
the case to the extent the Reference case stands reserved .
2.
Here is the case of Ref. No. 82 of 2015 related to the workman Sri Somar Chouhan a permanent employee of
Moonidih Coal Washery of M/s BCCL by designation Driver having personnel no. 01298983 had been keeping
unblemished track record of service till he had fallen in illness due to which he could not be able to perform his duty
w.e.f. 27.1.1996 .After recovery from illness the workman concerned reported for duty to the Management with
Medical Certificate but the Management turned down his request and did not allow him to join the duty as the
workman was absent due to sickness .However the Management went one step ahead by issuing the charge sheet to
the workman on the ground of absentism on 12.03.1997, as the workman do not see misconduct being on absetism
under the provisions of the Certified Standing Order an by-laws of the Group of the Collieries of the M/s BCCL
exclusively based at Dhanbad .Though the workman submitted his reply against the said alleged charge sheet that led
to formation of Enquiry to go the bottom of the facts and, to ascertain the misconduct to the extent the workman had
committed .The Enquiry Officer in a biased and prejudiced manner conducted the whole enquiry proceedings which
may be termed unfair ,illegal and unjustified and not in the line of principle of natural justice rather came out with
guilty of the charges which culminated into much harsher punishment as dismissal by the Disciplinary Authority
throwing the workman on the verge of starvation for not fault of his own in view of the petty misconduct of absentism
which do not seem rational rather disproportionate to the alleged misconduct of absetnism, as stated by the workman in
WS .This is certainly not the kind of penalty the worker would expect from the Management. In the enquiry the
workman was held guilty of the charge for petty misconduct which is shockingly disproportionate as the dismissal
amounts to capital punishment in service arena. Post dismissal the workman made appeal to the Management to
dispose of the appeal of the workman in accordance with the provision of the Certified Standing Orders. But arbitrarily
and illegally stand the Management had so far, did not yield any consideration. The contention of the Workman was
never taken into consideration either by the Enquiry Officer or by the Disciplinary authority. The enquiry outcome is
not fair and proper and in accordance of with the principle of the natural justice as alleged by the Workman. The
workman was handed out the dismissal letter by the Project Officer of Moonidih Coal Washery on dated 7/11-12-1997.
Post dismissal the workman made an fervent appeal to the management for reinstatement but to no avail which is
dubbed a violation of the provision of the Certified Standing Order itself. The allegation - misconduct , as came out
by the Management was not established during the enquiry nor did workman’s petition for prayer take into
consideration before imposing harsher punishment of dismissal .So the alleged act of the Management about dismissal
stands unjustified and arbitrary, thereby seeking reinstatement into service with full back wages summarily.
3.
Contrary to the fact, by categorically denying and brushing aside all allegations of the Union , the
OP/Management asserted that the case is not maintainable either in law or in fact as the dispute has been fabricated
to twisty suppression and non disclosure of material facts admitting that the workman Sri Somar Chouhan was a
permanent employee of Munidih Coal Washery designated as Driver (T),as stated by the Management in its W.S., The
workman had started absenting from his duty without information, prior permission or reasonable cause since
27.01.1996,thereby committing a misconduct. The Management asserted that upon framing the said charge sheet dt.
12.03.1997 the workman was asked to reply which was received by the Management on 02.07.1997. After examining
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
233
the properly, the reply was not found satisfactory leading to formation of domestic enquiry under Shr B.K.Choubey,
then Personnel Officer and Sri T. Chakrabotry as Enquiry Officer and Management Representative respectively .The
Enquiry Officer issued notice of Enquiry to both the parties to participate in Enquiry proceedings .Though the
workman had choice by his side to keep co-worker in his defence but his denial had nothing to do with the option .
During the course of enquiry the workman was held guilty of the charges brought in against him. After conducting
enquiry the Enquiry Officer submitted report holding the workman guilty under clause 26.1.1. of the Certified Standing
Orders of the Company as the charges have been fully established without any doubt. During the course of enquiry
proceedings so long his past habitual offender on absentism had been corroborated not by Management Representative
but witness also. Further assertion that the dismissal order of the workman had not been merely singled out to one
incident alone engulfing therein the whole past track of his service record especially the poor attendances in the past
couple of years. as the workman an permanent employee under the Employer had been in the habit of remaining
absent without leave and no satisfactory cause .He had turned a habitual offender slowly but steadily .The Said act
of absentism as quoted by workman’s saying attributed to workman’s poor mental state that led to keep the
Management grappling in darkness . The Competent Authority having gone through the enquiry proceedings and its
findings and related papers fully agreed in principle and thus viewing the past conduct of his attendances and proper
application of mind, inflicted the punishment of dismissal from service which is absolutely right, the workman
deserved for .So the conduct and manner in which enquiry held never got mired at any stage . And, the dismissal of
Sri Somar Chouhan is legally justified and proportionate to the misconduct committed by him. Overall the whole the
domestic enquiry conducted by Enquiry officer is fair, proper and in accordance with the principle of natural justice.
There is nothing sort of violation of natural justice in the said enqury.
Not surprisingly , cases of absentism get insignificant , unprecedented and nothing unusual in times so long as
Groups of the Collieries under the BCCL Management are concerned as hailing illiteracy backgrounds of workmen,
mostly intent to move on prolonged leave. The Misconduct of worker in this regard often run the risk of adversely
impacting the morale of the other Workers but matter becomes much more complicated with their involvement .The
work nature seems obviously arduous and tedious apart from all time being in hale & hearty in physical structure too
to work in the hazardous atmospheres under beneath of several feets or more from the surface. The exodus of the
workers from site of working has become a major humanitarian crisis and sparked widely dissent before the
Management fraternity that still to realize that they are also part of the production and regards them an indispensable
pillar for generations. Summing up, quantum of the punishment as dismissal inflicted upon the workman concerned
against the misconduct of absentism appears a little bit harsher and not in proportionate too .So a fresh look on the
issue cannot be ruled out.
So, there is nothing improper, unlawful and wrong-doings if the workman be provided a little bit breather.
Ultimately in the light of the above, it is ordered for fresh appointment of the workman concerned as Cat. -I with
probation up to two years but no back wages, whatsoever.
R. K. SARAN, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 10 tuojh] 2018
dk-vk- 92-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ ch-lh-
lh-,y- ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- 2] /uckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 55@2014) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 10-01-2018
dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&20012@104@2014&vkbZvkj (lh,e&I)º
,e- ds- flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 10th January, 2018
S.O. 92.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 2,
Dhanbad (Ref. No. 55 of 2014) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to
the management of M/s. BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 10.01.2018.
[No. L-20012/104/2014-IR (CM-I)]
M. K. SINGH, Section Officer
234
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO.2), AT DHANBAD
PRESENT : Shri R.K.Saran, Presiding Officer
In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1) (d) of the I.D. Act, 1947.
REFERENCE NO 55 OF 2014
PARTIES
:
The Jt. Gen. Secretary,
Bahujan Mazdoor Union,
Mines Rescue Station,
PO Dhansar, Dhanbad. 828106
Vs.
The General Manager,
E.J.Area of M/s BCCL,
PO: Bhowra, Dhanbad.828302
Order No. L-20012/104/2014-IR (CM-I) dt.09.10.2014
APPEARANCES
:
On behalf of the workman/Union
:
None
On behalf of the Management
:
Mr. U.N. Lal, Ld. Advocate
State : Jharkhand
Industry : Coal
Dated, Dhanbad, the 27th October, 2017
AWARD
The Government of India, Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Sec.10(1)(d)
of the I.D. Act.,1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L-20012/
104/2014-IR (CM-I) dt.09.10.2014.
SCHEDULE
Whether the action of the Management of Sudamdih Incline Mine of M/s BCCL in dismissing Sri Narayan
Lohar , Ex.M .Loader from the services of the Company vide office order dated 07.04.2010 is fair and justified ? To
what relief the concerned workman is entitled to?”
2.
Neither the workmen concerned nor any one from the Sponsoring Union appeared on date, nor did file the long
awaited W.S despite issuance of formal notices dt. 10.11,2014 ,09.03.2015 and ,29.06.2015 at the addresses of both the
parties concerned referred in the Order of the Reference itself barring 29.06.2015 which was sent to the Union alone.
None came out as Representative of the Management on date but was represented all along by the Ld. Adv. Mr. U.N.
Lal. The case deals with dismissal of the workmen by the Management seeking reliefs by challenging it.
On meticulously study of the record concerned it has been absolutely clear the case dates back to the year
of 2014 and it has been more than two years or so since it stands to where it was crawling one stage over the years
despite adjournment over more than ten times . It appears that the workmen’s own initiatives seem to have paid off as
the case stayed rolling out over one stage over years .This also signifies to gesture and conduct of the workman
concerned that he is no longer interested to contest to the instant case to finality through adjudication rather bent
upon to get adjournments .In real sense the case do not seem to have merits as of now , and the very existence
Industrial Dispute indeed any more appears to have ceased just because prolonged silence maintained on their part
,Usually, the Tribunal also do share the opinion of let it rolling further will be proved mere wastage of precious time
and energy and a hindrance in tackling the backlog of cases. Under these circumstances it would not amount to be
unfair, unjust and in line of violation of the natural justice if the instant case is closed on presumption of non-existent of
any Industrial Dispute as of now, between the parties concerned. Under such circumstance and facts, the case should be
closed as no-existent Industrial Dispute any longer owning to sheer disinterestedness of the Union/workman.
Accordingly “No Industrial Dispute” Award is passed.
R. K. SARAN, Presiding Officer
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
235
ubZ fnYyh] 10 tuojh] 2018
dk-vk- 93-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ lsy ds
çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- 2] /uckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 68@2015) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 10-01-2018
dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&26012@23@2015&vkbZvkj (lhe&I)º
,e- ds- flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 10th January, 2018
S.O. 93.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 2,
Dhanbad (Ref. No. 68 of 2015) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to
the management of M/s. SAIL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 10.01.2018.
[No. L-26012/23/2015-IR (CM-I)]
M. K. SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO.2), AT DHANBAD
PRESENT : Shri R.K.Saran, Presiding Officer
In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1) (d) of the I.D. Act, 1947.
REFERENCE NO. 68 OF 2015
PARTIES
:
Sri R.C. Ram,
Qr. No. 1099, Sector IX-B,
PO: Bokaro Steel City, Distt: Bokaro
Vs.
The General Manager (P & A)
SAIL, Bokaro Steel Plant,
P.O. Bokaro Steel City
Distt. Bokaro-827001.
Order No. L-26012/23/2015-IR(MI) dt. 23.09.2015
APPEARANCES :
On behalf of the workman/Union
:
None
On behalf of the Management
:
Mr. D. K. Verma, Ld. Advocate
State : Jharkhand
Industry : Steel
Dated, Dhanbad, the 3rd October, 2017
AWARD
The Government of India, Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Sec.10(1)(d)
of the I.D. Act.,1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No.
L-26012/23/2015-IR(M) dt.23.09.2015
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the Management of SAIL /Bokaro Steel Plant in dismissing Sri R.C.Ram from
the services of the Company w.e.f. 20/11.8.2011 is fair and justified? If not, to what relief the concerned
workman entitled?”
2.
Neither the workman nor any one on behalf of the workman/petitioner is reported to be present on date nor did
file the much-awaited WS due on his part on date since long even after serving a fresh notice; whereas Mr. D.K.Verma,
LD Advocate for the Management is present. Though Notices dt.5. 9.16, and the last one posting date on 06.01.2016
236
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
were mailed to the address of the Sponsoring Union referred in the Order of the Reference itself but all went in vain
even. The Management side was also kept informed .The case is related to dismissal from the service of the workman
by the Management thereby seeking relief by challenging it.
A through and emphatically scrutiny of the case record, it transpires that the case seems to be stalled over
filing the W.S. rest with the workman for over more than two years or so. Even after stepping over the first stage,
there seems to be no urgency on the part of the workman to file the much awaited WS despite providing sufficient
times as much as more than ten times since 24.02.2016. This indicates to gesture that the workman is no more
interested to get the instant case to final adjudication fuelling speculation that the case either must have been resolved
out of Court or an issue of non-existent, as of now. Simultaneously the Tribunal do not differ over of the view of
keeping the case rolling merely for dates, is of no use rather wastage of time and energy even after adjournments for
more than seven times, finally extract the conclusion of closing down for the end of the natural justice. Under these
circumstances the case is closed; and an order of the “No Dispute Award” is passed.
R. K. SARAN, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 10 tuojh] 2018
dk-vk- 94-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ
ch-lh-lh-,y- ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- 2] /uckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 35@2016) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks
10-01-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&20012@13@2016&vkbZvkj (lh,e&I)º
,e- ds- flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 10th January, 2018
S.O. 94.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 2,
Dhanbad (Ref. No. 35 of 2016) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to
the management of M/s. BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 10.01.2018.
[No. L-20012/13/2016-IR (CM-I)]
M. K. SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO.2), AT DHANBAD
PRESENT : Shri R.K.Saran, Presiding Officer
In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1) (d) of the I.D. Act, 1947.
REFERENCE NO 35 OF 2016
PARTIES
:
The Secretary,
Jharkhand Janta Mazdoor Union,
Vishwakarma Colony, Nutundih
PO: Jagjivan Nagar Dhanbad-826003
Vs.
The General Manager,
Lodna Area of M/s BCCL
PO : Khas Jeengora Dhanbad.
Ministry 's Order No L-20012/13/2016-IR(CM-I) dt 17.06.2016
APPEARANCES
:
On behalf of the workman/Union
:
Mr. P. Mandal, Ld. Rep. of the Union
On behalf of the Management
:
Mr. N.M. Kumar, Ld. Adv.
State : Jharkhand
Industry : Coal
Dated, Dhanbad, the 18th September, 2016
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939
237
AWARD
The Government of India, Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Sec.10(1)(d)
of the I.D. Act,1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. 20012/
13/2016-IR (CM-I) dt 17.06.2016
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the Management of Bararee Colliery of M/s BCCL in dismissing Shri Dasrath
Ravidas, Prs. No. 101837, Ex-Miner Loader from the services of the Company vide letter No. BBC/95/4450 dated
20.11.1995 is fair and justified? If not, to what relief the concerned workman is entitled?
On receipt of the Order No. L-20012/13/2016-IR(CM-I) dt 17.06.2016 of the above mentioned reference from
the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment, New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, the Reference
Case No. 35 of 2016 was registered on 22.06.2016 and accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue notices
through the Registered Posts to the parties concerned, directing them to appear in the Court on the date fixed, and to
file their written statements along with the relevant documents. In pursuance of the said order, notices by the Registered
Posts were sent to the parties concerned.
Both the parties made their appearances and filed their pleadings and photocopies of their documents. The
Union/Petitioner and the O.P./Management through their own Ld. Rep. /Counsel appeared, and contested the case.
2.
This is an another case based on footing of dismissal of the workman of Dasrath Ravidas who was a
permanent employee bearing P. No. 101837 designated as the Ex. M/Loader of Bararee Colliery under Lodna Area
under the Management of M/s BCCL, a Group of Collieries exclusively based at Dhanbad keeping unblemished track
record of service record had abruptly become sick since 16.03.1994 and started absenting but under reported it to the
Management accordingly. After recovery when from illness when the workman reported to the Management for
resumption of duty, the Management deliberately and illegally did not let him join the duty rather went one step ahead
by issuing a charge sheet to the workman on 20.07.1995 against the commission of misconduct as per the provision
under the clause of 26.1.1. of the Certified Standing Orders to which the workman replied categorically. The absent
itself is not a misconduct as stated by the workman in the WS. The workman was asked to appear before the Enquiry
Committees set up to ascertain the root cause of the absence and to go to the bottom of the fact and to the extent of the
alleged misconduct committed by the workman in which the workman concerned neither given opportunity to defend
his case nor did allow him to give full facts before the Committee as stated by the workman. Thus the enquiry itself
had been marred with violation of the natural justice and illegal. The contention of the Workman was never taken into
consideration either by the Enquiry Officer or by the Disciplinary authority. The enquiry outcome is not fair and proper
and in accordance of with the principle of the natural justice . At last the workman handed out the dismissal letter dated
20.11.1995 by the Competent Authority of the Bararee Colliery of M/s BCCL without giving an option of Second
Show Cause Notice and providing a copy of the concluded enquiry report to the workman concerned. Post dismissal
the workman made an fervent appeal to the management for reinstatement but to no avail which itself apparently a
violation of the provision of the clause 30 the Certified Standing Order. The allegations, as came out by the
Management were not established during the enquiry nor did workman’s petition for prayer take into consideration
before imposing harsher punishment of dismissal. So the alleged act of the Management about dismissal stands
unjustified and arbitrary, thereby seeking reinstatement into service summarily.
3.
It stands against the contrary to the fact that asserting by the Management at very beginning, ‘‘as the I.D. is
slate one, so the Union do not have locus-standi of raising the dispute after lapse of twenty years as of now, so the
Reference is prime facie not maintainable in-law or facts without any cause of action as claimed by the Management
categorically in its W.S. The workman concerned namely Dasrath Rabidas a permanent employee of Bararee Colliery
under Lodna Area of M/s BCCL was absenting from duty since 16.03.1994 without any information and permission
of the Management which constitutes a grave misconduct on his part of the workman. Though the workman was
framed charge sheet against his misconduct asking for reply which was not found satisfactory leading to formation of
Domestic Enquiry by Shri Lalan Pandey Dy. Personnel Manager Bararee Colliery as Enquiry Officer. The Committee
held the workman guilty of the charges brought in against him as the workman hopelessly had been failure to prove
innocence and the cause why he remained absent from duty since long without prior information and permission of the
Management. So long as second Show Cause notice was issued to the concerned workman but reply was more or less
unsatisfactory. Ultimately with the approval of the competent authority a dismissal letter had been issued to the
workman and sent at his home address but the workman knowingly and deliberately refused to receive the same.
4.
The said act on absentism on the part of the workman is attracted and termed as misconduct in accordance with
clause 26.1.1. of the Certified Standing Order, an by-laws of the Management of the M/s BCCL. Though the
Management came out with charge sheet of alleged being remained absentism for prolong period. Since reply
remained unsatisfactory, leading to formation of Departmental Enquiry to go to bottom of the fact by the
Disciplinary Authority solely in the line of the principle of natural justice. As the workman appeared before the
238
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
enquiry and submitted his reply to the said charge sheet. The issue, in quest, was referred the Domestic Enquiry to go
to the bottom of the facts and the workman was held guilty of the charges brought against him during the enquiry
proceedings. It is an extreme example of gross negligence on the part of the workman who later on turned habitual
absentee that got deep rooted leading to his dismissal from service. The alleged act of dismissal from service by the
Competent authority has been based on not merely singling out to a specific incident but taking into account the whole
aspect of past attendances during his service career and other service relevant matters, too.
Finally, the Competent Authority came forward with handing out the dismissal letter dt. 20.11.1995 only after
going through his past history of cases on absentism inclusive this one. Since the workman concerned kept on
indulging himself in absentism and turned it into habitual practice with no sign of abating in spite of full force with
which the Management did its best not to let the efforts and cohesion go in vain. Thus, neither there was any short of
violation of the principle of natural justice, nor did it get mired at any stage as alleged by the petitioner/Union rather the
alleged action of dismissal against the workman stands as fair, legal and justified.
5.
Though there is nothing unusual and unprecedented event like this one grabbing the headlines since past of
couple years as several hundred cases on the same footing happened in the Collieries earlier under the management of
BCCL, opened up the whole fiasco between Management and workers over harsher punishment inflicted upon the
workers. The work nature of the M/Loader is obviously arduous and tedious apart from the all time being in hale &
hearty in physical structure too to work in the hazardous atmospheres under beneath of several fetes or more from
the surface where quantum of oxygen sometimes reduces to drastically leading to causality or suffocation. So workman
do not hesitate to proceed on prolonged leave even on slightest pretext of reasons on one score or another before
stepping into the underground Mines despite safety mechanism in place by the Management. Notwithstanding so
much so there was no deterrent to avert the tragic accident in the Mines, and for which mostly workmen are still afraid
of. As such the move will not be called unjust and wrong-doings if the workman be provided one more opportunity to
reform himself by way of a little breather of fresh appointment.
So it is ordered for fresh appointment of the workman concerned in the lowest grade on proof of his actual
identity only with probation rolling over to two years and no back wages whatsoever.
R. K. SARAN, Presiding Officer
Uploaded by Dte. of Printing at Government of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi-110064
and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi-110054.
RAKESH
SUKUL
Digitally signed by
RAKESH SUKUL
Date: 2018.02.26
19:37:12 +05'30'