6 GI/2018

(59)

jftLVªh la- Mh- ,y- (,u) 04@0007@2003µ05

REGD. No. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05

izkf/dkj ls izdkf'kr

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

lkIrkfgd

WEEKLY

la- 2]

ubZ fnYyh] tuojh 7—tuojh 13] 2018] 'kfuokj@ ikS"k 17—ikS"k 23] 1939

No. 2]

NEW DELHI, JANUARY 7—JANUARY 13, 2018, SATURDAY/PAUSHA 17—PAUSHA 23, 1939

bl Hkkx esa fHkUu i`"B la[;k nh tkrh gS ftlls fd ;g i`Fkd ladyu ds :i esa j[kk tk lds

Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

Hkkx II—[k.M 3—mi&[k.M (ii)

PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)

Hkkjr ljdkj ds ea=kky;ksa (j{kk ea=kky; dks NksM+dj) }kjk tkjh fd, x, lkafof/d vkns'k vkSj vf/lwpuk,a

Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India

(Other than the Ministry of Defence)

fons'k ea=kky;

(lh-ih-oh- izHkkx)

ubZ fnYyh] 3 tuojh] 2018

dk-vk- 30-—jktuf;d vkSj dksalqyh; vf/dkjh ('kiFk ,oa iQhl) ds vf/fu;e] 1948 (1948 dk 41) dh /kjk 2 ds [akM

(d) ds vuqlj.k esa oS/kfud vkns'k A

,rn~}kjk dsaæ ljdkj Hkkjr ds nwrkokl] cS:r esa Jh fnyhi dkSy] lgk;d vuqHkkx vf/dkjh dks fnukad 3 tuojh] 2018 ls

lgk;d dksalqyj vf/dkjh ds rkSj ij dksalqyj lsokvksa ds fuoZgu ds fy, izkfèkd`r djrh gS A

¹la- Vh&4330@01@2016º

izdk'k pUn] funs'kd (dksalqyj)

MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS

(C.P.V. DIVISION)

New Delhi, the 3rd January, 2018

S.O. 30.—In pursuance of the clause (a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular Officers (Oaths and

Fees) Act, 1948 (41 of 1948), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Dileep Koul, Assistant Section Officer as

60

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Assistant Consular Officer in Embassy of India, Beirut to perform the Consular services as with effect from

3rd January, 2018.

[No. T-4330/01/2016]

PRAKASH CHAND, Director (Consular)

ubZ fnYyh] 8 tuojh] 2018

dk-vk- 31-—jktuf;d vkSj dksalqyh; vf/dkjh ('kiFk ,oa iQhl) ds vf/fu;e] 1948 (1948 dk 41) dh /kjk 2 ds [akM

(d) ds vuqlj.k esa oS/kfud vkns'k A ,rn~}kjk dsaæ ljdkj Hkkjr ds iz/ku dksalykokl] tsíkg esa Jh lquhy Jh d.kZ] futh lgk;d

dks fnukad 8 tuojh] 2018 ls lgk;d dksalqyj vf/dkjh ds rkSj ij dksalqyj lsokvksa ds fuoZgu ds fy, izkfèkd`r djrh gS A

¹la- Vh&4330@01@2015º

izdk'k pUn] funs'kd (dksalqyj)

New Delhi, the 8th January, 2018

S.O. 31.—In pursuance of the clause (a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular Officers (Oaths and

Fees) Act, 1948 (41 of 1948), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri SUNIL S. KARN, Personal Assistant as

Assistant Consular Officer in Consulate General of India, Jeddah to perform the Consular services as with effect from

8th January, 2018.

[No. T-4330/01/2015]

PRAKASH CHAND, Director (Consular)

िव मंालय

िव मंालय

िव मंालय

िव मंालय

(िवीय सेवाएं िवभाग

िवीय सेवाएं िवभाग

िवीय सेवाएं िवभाग

िवीय सेवाएं िवभाग)

नई दली, 27 दस बर, 2017

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 32

32

32

32.—राीयकृत बक (बंध और कण उपबंध) कम, 1980 के खंड (9) के उप-खंड (2) क मद (ख) के साथ प!ठत

बककारी कंपनी (उप$म% का अजन और अंतरण) अिधिनयम, 1980 (1980 का 40) क धारा 9 क उप-धारा (3) के खंड (छ) ,ारा

द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए, के56ीय सरकार, एत7ारा, 8ी शैलेश रामजी घेदया (ज5म ितिथः 25.04.1957) को उनक िनयुि0

क अिधसूचना क तारीख से तीन वष क अविध के िलए अथवा अगले आदेश% तक, जो भी पहले हो, पंजाब एंड Fसंध बक के िनदेशक

मGडल मH सनदी लेखाकार (चाटड अकाउंटHट) 8ेणी के अंतगत अंशकािलक गैर-सरकारी िनदेशक के पद पर नािमत करती है।

[फा.सं. 6/1/2015-बीओ-I]

Jानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव

MINISTRY OF FINANCE

(Department of Financial Services)

New Delhi, the 27th December, 2017

S.O. 32.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (g) of sub-section (3) of Section 9 of the Banking

Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1980 (40 of 1980) read with item (b) of sub-clause (2) of

clause (9) of the Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1980, the Central

Government, hereby nominates Shri Shailesh Ramji Ghedia (DoB: 25.4.1957) as Part-time Non-official Director under

Chartered Accountant category on the Board of Directors of Punjab & Sind Bank for a period of three years, from the

date of notification of his appointment or until further orders, whichever is earlier.

[F. No. 6/1/2015-BO-I]

JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

61

नई दली, 27 दस बर, 2017

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 33

33

33

33.—राीयकृत बक (बंध और कण उपबंध) कम, 1980 के खंड (9) के उप-खंड (2) क मद (ख) के साथ प!ठत

बककारी कंपनी (उप$म% का अजन और अंतरण) अिधिनयम, 1980 (1980 का 40) क धारा 9 क उप-धारा (3) के खंड (छ) ,ारा

द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए, के56ीय सरकार, एत7ारा, 8ी बालगोपाल महापाKा (ज5म ितिथः 12.07.1959) को उनक िनयुि0

क अिधसूचना क तारीख से तीन वष क अविध के िलए अथवा अगले आदेश% तक, जो भी पहले हो, आ5Lा बक के िनदेशक मGडल मH

सनदी लेखाकार (चाटड अकाउंटHट) 8ेणी के अंतगत अंशकािलक गैर-सरकारी िनदेशक के पद पर नािमत करती है।

[फा.सं. 6/1/2015-बीओ-I]

Jानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 27th December, 2017

S.O. 33.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (g) of sub-section (3) of Section 9 of the Banking

Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1980 (40 of 1980) read with item (b) of sub-clause (2) of

clause (9) of the Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1980, the Central

Government, hereby nominates Shri Balgopal Mahapatra (DoB: 12.7.1959) as Part-time Non-official Director under

Chartered Accountant category on the Board of Directors of Andhra Bank for a period of three years, from the date of

notification of his appointment or until further orders, whichever is earlier.

[F. No. 6/1/2015-BO-I]

JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.

नई दली, 27 दस बर, 2017

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 34

34

34

34.—राीयकृत बक (बंध और कण उपबंध) कम, 1980 के खंड (9) के उप-खंड (2) क मद (ख) के साथ प!ठत

बककारी कंपनी (उप$म% का अजन और अंतरण) अिधिनयम, 1980 (1980 का 40) क धारा 9 क उप-धारा (3) के खंड (छ) ,ारा

द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए, के56ीय सरकार, एत7ारा, 8ी के. 8ीिनवास मूNत (ज5म ितिथः 19.11.1964) को उनक िनयुि0 क

अिधसूचना क तारीख से तीन वष क अविध के िलए अथवा अगले आदेश% तक, जो भी पहले हो, कापOरेशन बक के िनदेशक मGडल मH

सनदी लेखाकार (चाटड अकाउंटHट) 8ेणी के अंतगत अंशकािलक गैर-सरकारी िनदेशक के पद पर नािमत करती है।

[फा.सं. 6/1/2015-बीओ-I]

Jानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 27th December, 2017

S.O. 34.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (g) of sub-section (3) of Section 9 of the Banking

Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1980 (40 of 1980) read with item (b) of sub-clause (2) of

clause (9) of The Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1980, the Central

Government, hereby nominates Shri K. Srinivasa Murthy (DoB: 19.11.1964) as Part-time Non-official Director under

Chartered Accountant category on the Board of Directors of Corporation Bank for a period of three years, from the

date of notification of his appointment or until further orders, whichever is earlier.

[F. No. 6/1/2015-BO-I]

JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.

नई दली, 27 दस बर, 2017

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 35

35

35

35.—राीयकृत बक (बंध और कण उपबंध) कम, 1970 के खंड (9) के उप-खंड (2) क मद (ख) के साथ प!ठत

बककारी कंपनी (उप$म% का अजन और अंतरण) अिधिनयम, 1970 (1970 का 5) क धारा 9 क उप-धारा (3) के खंड (छ) ,ारा द-

शि0य% का योग करते 3ए, के56ीय सरकार, एत7ारा, 8ी दनेश Fसंह (ज5म ितिथः 22.10.1969) को उनक िनयुि0 क अिधसूचना

क तारीख से तीन वष क अविध के िलए अथवा अगले आदेश% तक, जो भी पहले हो, युनाइटेड बक आफ इंिडया के िनदेशक मGडल मH

सनदी लेखाकार (चाटड अकाउंटHट) 8ेणी के अंतगत अंशकािलक गैर-सरकारी िनदेशक के पद पर नािमत करती है।

[फा.सं. 6/1/2015-बीओ-I]

Jानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव

62

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 27th December, 2017

S.O. 35.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (g) of sub-section (3) of Section 9 of the Banking

Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 (5 of 1970) read with item (b) of sub-clause (2) of

clause (9) of the Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970, the Central

Government, hereby nominates Shri Denesh Singh (DoB: 22.10.1969) as Part-time Non-official Director under

Chartered Accountant category on the Board of Directors of United Bank of India for a period of three years, from the

date of notification of his appointment or until further orders, whichever is earlier.

[F. No. 6/1/2015-BO-I]

JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.

नई दली, 27 दस बर, 2017

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 36

36

36

36.—राीयकृत बक (बंध और कण उपबंध) कम, 1980 के खंड (9) के उप-खंड (2) क मद (ख) के साथ प!ठत

बककारी कंपनी (उप$म% का अजन और अंतरण) अिधिनयम, 1980 (1980 का 40) क धारा 9 क उप-धारा (3) के खंड (छ) ,ारा

द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए, के56ीय सरकार, एत7ारा, 8ी िववेक सोनी (ज5म ितिथः 24.07.1962) को उनक िनयुि0 क

अिधसूचना क तारीख से तीन वष क अविध के िलए अथवा अगले आदेश% तक, जो भी पहले हो, िवजया बक के िनदेशक मGडल मH

सनदी लेखाकार (चाटड अकाउंटHट) 8ेणी के अंतगत अंशकािलक गैर-सरकारी िनदेशक के पद पर नािमत करती है।

[फा.सं. 6/1/2015-बीओ-I]

Jानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 27th December, 2017

S.O. 36.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (g) of sub-section (3) of Section 9 of the Banking

Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1980 (40 of 1980) read with item (b) of sub-clause (2) of

clause (9) of the Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1980, the Central

Government, hereby nominates Shri Vivek Soni (DoB: 24.7.1962) as Part-time Non-official Director under Chartered

Accountant category on the Board of Directors of Vijaya Bank for a period of three years, from the date of notification

of his appointment or until further orders, whichever is earlier.

[F. No. 6/1/2015-BO-I]

JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.

नई दली, 27 दस बर, 2017

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 37

37

37

37.—राीयकृत बक (बंध और कण उपबंध) कम, 1980 के खंड (3) के उप-खंड (1) के साथ प!ठत बककारी

कंपनी (उप$म% का अजन और अंतरण) अिधिनयम, 1980 (1980 का 40) क धारा 9 क उप-धारा (3) के खंड (ज) और उप-धारा (3-

क) ,ारा द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए, के56ीय सरकार, एत7ारा, 8ी मधु सूदन दादु (ज5म ितिथः 05.06.1963) को उनक

िनयुि0 क अिधसूचना क तारीख से तीन वष क अविध के िलए अथवा अगले आदेश% तक, जो भी पहले हो, पंजाब एंड Fसंध बक के

िनदेशक मGडल मH अंशकािलक गैर-सरकारी िनदेशक के पद पर नािमत करती है।

[फा.सं. 6/1/2015-बीओ-I]

Jानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 27th December, 2017

S.O. 37.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (h) of sub-section (3) and sub-section (3-A) of section

9 of The Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1980 (40 of 1980) read with sub-clause

(1) of clause (3) of the Nationalized Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1980, the Central

Government hereby nominates Shri Madhu Sudan Dadu (DoB: 5.6.1963) as Part-time Non-official Director on the

Board of Directors of Punjab & Sind Bank for a period of three years, from the date of notification of his appointment

or until further orders, whichever is earlier.

[F. No. 6/1/2015-BO-I]

JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

63

नई दली, 27 दस बर, 2017

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 38

38

38

38.—राीयकृत बक (बंध और कण उपबंध) कम, 1970 के खंड (3) के उप-खंड (1) के साथ प!ठत बककारी

कंपनी (उप$म% का अजन और अंतरण) अिधिनयम, 1970 (1970 का 5) क धारा 9 क उप-धारा (3) के खंड (ज) और उप-धारा (3-

क) ,ारा द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए, के56ीय सरकार, एत7ारा, 8ी आशीष साहा (ज5म ितिथः 08.10.1954) को उनक िनयुि0

क अिधसूचना क तारीख से तीन वष क अविध के िलए अथवा अगले आदेश% तक, जो भी पहले हो, यूको बक के िनदेशक मGडल मH

अंशकािलक गैर-सरकारी िनदेशक के पद पर नािमत करती है।

[फा.सं. 6/1/2015-बीओ-I]

Jानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 27th December, 2017

S.O. 38.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (h) of sub-section (3) and sub-section (3-A) of section

9 of The Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 (5 of 1970) read with sub-clause

(1) of clause (3) of the Nationalized Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970, the Central

Government hereby nominates Shri Asish Saha (DoB: 8.10.1954) as Part-time Non-official Director on the Board of

Directors of UCO Bank for a period of three years, from the date of notification of his appointment or until further

orders, whichever is earlier.

[F. No. 6/1/2015-BO-I]

JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.

नई दली, 27 दस बर, 2017

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 39

39

39

39.—राीयकृत बक (बंध और कण उपबंध) कम, 1970 के खंड (3) के उप-खंड (1) के साथ प!ठत बककारी

कंपनी (उप$म% का अजन और अंतरण) अिधिनयम, 1970 (1970 का 5) क धारा 9 क उप-धारा (3) के खंड (ज) और उप-धारा (3-

क) ,ारा द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए, के56ीय सरकार, एत7ारा, सु8ी मधुर वामीनाथन (ज5म ितिथः 23.02.1961) को उनक

िनयुि0 क अिधसूचना क तारीख से तीन वष क अविध के िलए अथवा अगले आदेश% तक, जो भी पहले हो, यूिनयन बक आफ इंिडया

के िनदेशक मGडल मH अंशकािलक गैर-सरकारी िनदेशक के पद पर नािमत करती है।

[फा.सं. 6/1/2015-बीओ-I]

Jानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 27th December, 2017

S.O. 39.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (h) of sub-section (3) and sub-section (3-A) of section

9 of The Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 (5 of 1970) read with sub-clause

(1) of clause (3) of the Nationalized Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970, the Central

Government hereby nominates Ms. Madhura Swaminathan (DoB: 23.2.1961) as Part-time Non-official Director on the

Board of Directors of Union Bank of India for a period of three years, from the date of notification of her appointment

or until further orders, whichever is earlier.

[F. No. 6/1/2015-BO-I]

JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.

नई दली, 27 दस बर, 2017

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 40

40

40

40.—राीयकृत बक (बंध और कण उपबंध) कम, 1980 के खंड (3) के उप-खंड (1) के साथ प!ठत बककारी

कंपनी (उप$म% का अजन और अंतरण) अिधिनयम, 1980 (1980 का 40) क धारा 9 क उप-धारा (3) के खंड (ज) और उप-धारा

(3-क) ,ारा द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए, के56ीय सरकार, एत7ारा, 8ी िशवरमन अनंत नारायण (ज5म ितिथः 29.09.1950) को

उनक िनयुि0 क अिधसूचना क तारीख से तीन वष क अविध के िलए अथवा अगले आदेश% तक, जो भी पहले हो, इिGडयन ओवरसीज

बक के िनदेशक मGडल मH अंशकािलक गैर-सरकारी िनदेशक के पद पर नािमत करती है।

[फा.सं. 6/1/2015-बीओ-I]

Jानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव

64

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 27th December, 2017

S.O. 40.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (h) of sub-section (3) and sub-section (3-A) of section

9 of The Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1980 (40 of 1980) read with sub-clause

(1) of clause (3) of the Nationalized Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1980, the Central

Government hereby nominates Shri Sivaraman Anant Narayan (DoB: 29.9.1950) as Part-time Non-official Director on

the Board of Directors of Indian Overseas Bank for a period of three years, from the date of notification of his

appointment or until further orders, whichever is earlier.

[F. No. 6/1/2015-BO-I]

JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.

नई दली, 27 दस बर, 2017

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 41

41

41

41.—राीयकृत बक (बंध और कण उपबंध) कम, 1970 के खंड (3) के उप-खंड (1) के साथ प!ठत बककारी

कंपनी (उप$म% का अजन और अंतरण) अिधिनयम, 1970 (1970 का 5) क धारा 9 क उप-धारा (3) के खंड (ज) और उप-धारा

(3-क) ,ारा द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए, के56ीय सरकार, एत7ारा, 8ी िसTाथ धान (ज5म ितिथः 12.06.1952) को उनक

िनयुि0 क अिधसूचना क तारीख से तीन वष क अविध के िलए अथवा अगले आदेश% तक, जो भी पहले हो, युनाइटेड बक आफ इंिडया

के िनदेशक मGडल मH अंशकािलक गैर-सरकारी िनदेशक के पद पर नािमत करती है।

[फा.सं. 6/1/2015-बीओ-I]

Jानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 27th December, 2017

S.O. 41.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (h) of sub-section (3) and sub-section (3-A) of section

9 of The Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 (5 of 1970) read with sub-clause

(1) of clause (3) of the Nationalized Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970, the Central

Government hereby nominates Shri Sidhartha Pradhan (DoB: 12.6.1952) as Part-time Non-official Director on the

Board of Directors of United Bank of India for a period of three years, from the date of notification of his appointment

or until further orders, whichever is earlier.

[F. No. 6/1/2015-BO-I]

JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.

नई दली, 27 दस बर, 2017

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 42

42

42

42.—राीयकृत बक (बंध और कण उपबंध) कम, 1970 के खंड (3) के उप-खंड (1) के साथ प!ठत बककारी

कंपनी (उप$म% का अजन और अंतरण) अिधिनयम, 1970 (1970 का 5) क धारा 9 क उप-धारा (3) के खंड (ज) और उप-धारा

(3-क) ,ारा द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए, के56ीय सरकार, एत7ारा, डॉ. आVमानंद (ज5म ितिथः 30.06.1959) को उनक िनयुि0

क अिधसूचना क तारीख से तीन वष क अविध के िलए अथवा अगले आदेश% तक, जो भी पहले हो, से5Wल बक आफ इंिडया के िनदेशक

मGडल मH अंशकािलक गैर-सरकारी िनदेशक के पद पर नािमत करती है।

[फा.सं. 6/1/2015-बीओ-I]

Jानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 27th December, 2017

S.O. 42.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (h) of sub-section (3) and sub-section (3-A) of section

9 of The Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 (5 of 1970) read with sub-clause

(1) of clause (3) of the Nationalized Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970, the Central

Government hereby nominates Dr Atmanand (DoB: 30.6.1959) as Part-time Non-official Director on the Board of

Directors of Central Bank of India for a period of three years, from the date of notification of his appointment or until

further orders, whichever is earlier.

[F. No. 6/1/2015-BO-I]

JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

65

नई दली, 27 दस बर, 2017

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.43

43

43

43 .—राीयकृत बक (बंध और कण उपबंध) कम, 1970 के खंड (3) के उप-खंड (1) के साथ प!ठत बककारी

कंपनी (उप$म% का अजन और अंतरण) अिधिनयम, 1970 (1970 का 5) क धारा 9 क उप-धारा (3) के खंड (ज) और उप-धारा (3-

क) ,ारा द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए, के56ीय सरकार, एत7ारा, 8ी सिलल कुमार झा (ज5म ितिथः 18.07.1953) को उनक

िनयुि0 क अिधसूचना क तारीख से तीन वष क अविध के िलए अथवा अगले आदेश% तक, जो भी पहले हो, इंिडयन बक के िनदेशक

मGडल मH अंशकािलक गैर-सरकारी िनदेशक के पद पर नािमत करती है।

[फा.सं. 6/1/2015-बीओ-I]

Jानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 27th December, 2017

S.O. 43.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (h) of sub-section (3) and sub-section (3-A) of section

9 of The Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 (5 of 1970) read with sub-clause

(1) of clause (3) of the Nationalized Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970, the Central

Government hereby nominates Shri Salil Kumar Jha (DoB: 18.7.1953) as Part-time Non-official Director on the Board

of Directors of Indian Bank for a period of three years, from the date of notification of his appointment or until further

orders, whichever is earlier.

[F. No. 6/1/2015-BO-I]

JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.

नई दली, 1 जनवरी, 2018

का

का

का

का.आ.

आ.

आ.

आ. 44

44

44

44.—भारतीय लघु उYोग िवकास बक अिधिनयम, 1989 (1989 का 39) क धारा 6 क उप-धारा (1) के खंड (ग)

,ारा द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए, के5 6ीय सरकार, एत7ारा, 8ी सुरे5 6 नाथ िKपाठी के  थान पर 8ी राम मोहन िम8ा, अपर

सिचव एवं िवकास आयु\ त, सू] म, लघु एवं म^ यम उYम मंKालय को तV काल भाव से अगले आदेश% तक, भारतीय लघु उYोग िवकास

बक (िसडबी) के िनदेशक मंडल मH सरकारी नािमती िनदेशक िनयु0 करती है।

[फा.सं. 17/15/2017-आईएफ-II]

सौ यिजत घोष, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 1st January, 2018

S.O. 44.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of Section (6) of the Small

Industries Development Bank of India Act, 1989 (39 of 1989), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Ram

Mohan Mishra, Additional Secretary & Development Commissioner, Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium

Enterprises, as Central Government nominee Director on the Board of Directors of Small Industries Development Bank

of India (SIDBI) with immediate effect vice Shri Surendra Nath Tripathi, until further orders.

[F. No. 17/15/2017-IF-II]

SOUMYAJIT GHOSH, Under Secy.

वा

वा

वा

वा य

य

य

य और परवार क या

और परवार क या

और परवार क या

और परवार क याण मंालय

ण मंालय

ण मंालय

ण मंालय

( वा

( वा

( वा

( वा  य

  य

  य

  य एवं परवार क या

एवं परवार क या

एवं परवार क या

एवं परवार क याण िवभाग)

ण िवभाग)

ण िवभाग)

ण िवभाग)

नई द ली, 5 जनवरी, 2018

का

का

का

का.आ.

आ.

आ.

आ. 45

45

45

45.—जबक, भारतीय िचकV सा प!रषद~ (संशोधन) अ^ यादेश; 2013 क धारा 3क क उप-धारा (1) ,ारा दV त

शि0य% का उपयोग करते 3ए 05 नव बर, 2013 को, भारतीय िचकV सा प!रषद् का पुनगठन कया गया था;

66

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

और जबक भारतीय िचकV सा अिधिनयम, 1956 (1956 का 102) क धारा 3 क उप-धारा (1) (ख) के ावधान के

अनुसरण मH, तीथeकर महावीर िवf विवYालय, मुरादाबाद का ितिनिधV व कर रहे डॉ. वेद काश िम8ा को 27.03.2014 से भारतीय

िचकV सा प!रषद् के सद य के gप मH चुना गया था;

और जबक भारतीय िचकV सा प!रषद् अिधिनयम, 1956 (1956 का 102) क धारा 3 क उप-धारा (1) के खंड (क) के

अनुसरण मH तथा संबंिधत राh य सरकार के साथ परामश करके के5 6ीय सरकार ने डॉ. कशोर बी. ताओरी का देहा5 त होने के कारण

!र\ त 3ए आकिमक पद पर इस अिधसूचना के जारी होने क ितिथ से डॉ. कशोर बी. ताओरी क शेष अविध अथात् 04.11.2018 तक

के िलए डॉ. वेद काश िम8ा को भारतीय िचकV सा प!रषद् का सद य मनोनीत कया है।

और जबक, डॉ. वेद काश िम8ा ने आईएमसी अिधिनयम, 1956 क धारा 3(1)(क) के तहत राh य का ितिनिधV व करने

हेतु एमसीआई का सद य बनने के िलए अपनी सहमित दे दी है और आईएमसी अिधिनयम, 1956 क धारा 5(2) के अनुसार, कोई

j यि0 एक ही समय पर सद य के gप मH एक से अिधक पद% पर नहk रह सकता। अत: आईएमसी अिधिनयम, 1956 क धारा 7(3) मH

िनिहत ावधान% के अनुसरण मH आईएमसी अिधिनयम, 1956 क धारा 3(1)(ख) के तहत तीथeकर महावीर िवf विवYालय, मुरादाबाद

का ितिनिधV व कर रहे डॉ. वेद काश िम8ा को भारतीय िचकV सा प!रषद् क सद यता समाn त हो गई है।

अत: अब तीथeकर महावीर िवf विवYालय, मुरादाबाद का ितिनिधV व कर रहे डॉ. वेद काश िम8ा क भारतीय िचकV सा

प!रषद् क सद यता समाn त मानी जाएगी।

और, इसिलए, उ\ त अिधिनयम क धारा 3 क उप-धारा (1) के ावधान के अनुसरण मH के5 6ीय सरकार एत7ारा तV कालीन

 वा o य मंKालय क दनांक 9 जनवरी, 1960 क सां.आ. 138 मH भारत सरकार क अिधसूचना मH िन निलिखत संशोधन करती है,

नामत;

 वा o य और प!रवार क याण मंKालय सं. सां.आ. 3323 (ई) दनांक 06 नव बर, 2013 मH भारत सरकार क अिधसूचना

तथा उसमH कए गए संशोधन%, अंितम िविp के पf चात तथा उससे संबंिधत िविp मH िन निलिखत जोड़ा जाएगा, नामत:

.सं.

.सं.

.सं.

.सं.

रा य

रा य

रा य

रा य सरकार का नाम

सरकार का नाम

सरकार का नाम

सरकार का नाम

नािमत सद य

नािमत सद य

नािमत सद य

नािमत सद य का  यौ

का  यौ

का  यौ

का  यौरा

रारा

रा

14

महाराq W

डॉ. वेद काश िम8ा

[सं. वी-11013/01/2016-एमईपी]

डी. वी. के. राव, अवर सिचव

MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE

(Department of Health and Family Welfare)

New Delhi, the 5th January, 2018

S.O. 45.—Whereas on 5th November, 2013, the Medical Council of India was re-constituted in exercise of the

powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3A of the Indian Medical Council (Amendment) Ordinance, 2013;

And whereas in pursuance of the provision of sub-section (1)(b) of Section 3 of the Indian Medical Act, 1956

(102 of 1956), Dr. Ved Prakash Mishra was elected as a member of the Medical Council of India representing

Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Moradabad with effect from 27.03.2014;

And whereas the Central Government, in pursuance of clause (a) of sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Indian

Medical Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956) and in consultation with the respective State Government has nominated Dr.

Ved Prakash Mishra to be a member of the Medical Council of India against the casual vacancy formed due to demise

of Dr. Kishor B. Taori for the remainder of the term of Dr. Kishor B. Taori i.e. upto 04.11.2018 with effect from the

date of issue of this notification.

And whereas Dr. Ved Prakash Mishra has given his consent to be a member of MCI representing the State

under Section 3(1)(a) of IMC Act, 1956 and as per Section 5(2) of IMC Act, 1956, any person at the same time may not

serve as a member in more than one capacity. Therefore, Dr. Ved Prakash Mishra has ceased to be a member of

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

67

Medical Council of India representing Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Moradabad under section 3(1)(b) of IMC Act,

1956 in accordance with the provisions contained in Section 7(3) of IMC Act, 1956.

Now, therefore, Dr. Ved Prakash Mishra shall be deemed to have ceased to be a member of the Medical

Council of India representing Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Moradabad with effect from 04.01.2018.

And, therefore, in pursuance of the provision of sub section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act the Central

Government hereby makes the following amendment in the Notification of the Government of India in the then

Ministry of Health number S.O. 138 dated the 9th January, 1960, namely;

In the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Health & Family Welfare number S.O.

3323(E) dated 06th November, 2013 and amendments thereto, after the last entry and entry relating thereto, the

following shall be inserted, namely:

S. No.

Name of the State Government

Details of the Nominated

Member

14.

Maharashtra

Dr. Ved Prakash Mishra

[No. V-11013/01/2016-MEP]

D. V. K. RAO, Under Secy.

उपभो ा मामले, खा$ और साव%जिनक िवतरण मंालय

उपभो ा मामले, खा$ और साव%जिनक िवतरण मंालय

उपभो ा मामले, खा$ और साव%जिनक िवतरण मंालय

उपभो ा मामले, खा$ और साव%जिनक िवतरण मंालय

(उपभोा मामले िवभाग)

(उपभोा मामले िवभाग)

(उपभोा मामले िवभाग)

(उपभोा मामले िवभाग)

(भारतीय मानक यूरो

भारतीय मानक यूरो

भारतीय मानक यूरो

भारतीय मानक यूरो)

नई द ली, 22 दस बर, 2017

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 46

46

46

46.— भारतीय मानक r यूरो (माणन) िविनयम 1988 के िविनयम (4) के उपिविनयम (5) के अनुसरण मH भारतीय

मानक r यूरो ,rn~}kjk अिधसूिचत करता है क िजन लाइसHस% के िववरण नीचे अनुसूची मH दए गए ह, वे  वीकृत कर दए गए ह:-

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

$म

संs या

लाइसHस संs या

 वीकृत करने

क ितिथ

लाइसHसधारी का नाम

व प-ा

भारतीय मानक का

शीषक

भा मा

भाग

अनु

वष

1.

एल-

9512387222

03.08.2017

मै0 िहना इG ड Wीस (ाo)

िलo,

n लॉट नंo 45, सै\ टर - 27ए,

िजला फरीदाबाद - 121003,

ह!रयाणा

िखजाब, तरल, जैल

और $म

8481

-

-

2001

2.

एल-

9512386523

08.08.2017

मै0 आV मा सो परमाV मा WेFडंग,

लोहाg रोड, िसवानी मG डी,

िसवानी,

िजला िभवानी,

ह!रयाणा

खड़ंजे के िलए पूव

ढिलत कं$ट r लॉक

15658

-

-

2006

68

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

3.

एल-

9512386725

08.08.2017

मै0 इएयू बाFथंग सोलूशनस

ाo िलo ,

िबनोला इG ड Wीयल ए!रया

भौरा कलां,

फgक नगर,

िजला xqM+xk¡o - 122413,

ह!रयाणा

जल कायu के िलए

तांबा िम8धातु

सजावटी एक ट%टी,

संयोिजत ट%टी

समुv चय और रोक

वा व

8931

-

-

1993

4.

एल-

9590001818

08.08.2017

मै0 नीरज h वैलस,

7271, गुड़ बाजार,

िजला रेवाड़ी – 123401,

ह!रयाणा

 वण एवं  वण

िम8धातु

आभूषण/िश प

व तुx –

महीनता एवं

मुहरांकन

1417

-

-

2016

5.

एल-

9590001919

08.08.2017

मै0 बाबू लाल राजेश कुमार

सोनी,

बूरा बाज़ार,

िजला रेवाड़ी,

ह!रयाणा

 वण एवं  वण

िम8धातु

आभूषण/िश प

व तुx –

महीनता एवं

मुहरांकन

1417

-

-

2016

6.

एल-

9590002020

08.08.2017

मै0 बाबू लाल राजेश कुमार

सोनी,

बूरा बाज़ार,

िजला रेवाड़ी,

ह!रयाणा

चyदी एवं चyदी

िम8धातु

आभूषण/िश प

व तुx –

महीनता एवं

मुहरांकन

2112

-

-

2014

7.

एल-

9590002121

08.08.2017

मै0 दलीप h वैलस,

वाड नं0 3, टोडापुर रोड, हेली

मG डी,

िजला xqM+xk¡o,

ह!रयाणा

 वण एवं  वण

िम8धातु

आभूषण/िश प

व तुx –

महीनता एवं

मुहरांकन

1417

-

-

2016

8.

एल-

9590002222

08.08.2017

मै0 दीप h वैलस,

गुड़ बाज़ार,

िजला रेवाड़ी – 123401,

ह!रयाणा

 वण एवं  वण

िम8धातु

आभूषण/िश प

व तुx –

महीनता एवं

मुहरांकन

1417

-

-

2016

9.

एल-

9590002323

08.08.2017

मै0 दीप h वैलस,

गुड़ बाज़ार,

िजला रेवाड़ी – 123401,

ह!रयाणा

चyदी एवं चyदी

िम8धातु

आभूषण/िश प

व तुx –

महीनता एवं

मुहरांकन

2112

-

-

2014

10.

एल-

9590002424

08.08.2017

मै0 दलीप h वैलस,

वाड नं0 3, टोडापुर रोड, हेली

मG डी,

िजला xqM+xk¡o,

ह!रयाणा

चyदी एवं चyदी

िम8धातु

आभूषण/िश प

व तुx –

महीनता एवं

मुहरांकन

2112

-

-

2014

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

69

11.

एल-

9590002517

16.08.2017

मै0 8ी जी h वैलस,

शॉप-1, बेसमHट, लाला मनीराम

माzकट 2nd, मेन बाज़ार,

धाgहेड़ा,

िजला रेवाड़ी – 123106,

ह!रयाणा

 वण एवं  वण

िम8धातु

आभूषण/िश प

व तुx –

महीनता एवं

मुहरांकन

1417

-

-

2116

12.

एल-

9512386919

17.08.2017

मै0 अरावली को-ऑपरे!टव

लेबर एG ड कं W\ शन िलo,

गyव व डाकघर पाली, एन.

आई. टी.,

िजला फरीदाबाद - 121004,

ह!रयाणा

खड़ंजे के िलए पूव

ढिलत कं$ट r लॉक

15658

-

-

2006

13.

एल-

9512387020

21.08.2017

मै0 जे. एम. टाइ स,

गyव करनेरा, समयपुर सोहना

रोड,

सै\ टर – 56 के नज़दीक,

िजला फरीदाबाद – 121004,

ह!रयाणा

खड़ंजे के िलए पूव

ढिलत कं$ट r लॉक

15658

-

-

2006

14.

एल-

9590002618

23.08.2017

मै0 ज़ेवर पैलेस,

शॉप नं0 4ए, एनएच-2, 1-2

चौक,

एन. आई. टी.,

िजला फरीदाबाद,

ह!रयाणा

चyदी एवं चyदी

िम8धातु

आभूषण/िश प

व तुx –

महीनता एवं

मुहरांकन

2112

-

-

2014

15.

एल-

9512387121

24.08.2017

मै0 गौरव इ5 टराइिसस,

44 केएम  टोन, एनएच-2,

बराज़र फाम हाउस के पीछे,

गyव सीकरी, ब लभगढ़,

िजला फरीदाबाद,

ह!रयाणा

खड़ंजे के िलए पूव

ढिलत कं$ट r लॉक

15658

-

-

2006

16.

एल-

9512387820

24.08.2017

मै0 अतुल पाइप कॉरपोरेशन,

रेलवे $ाFसंग के नज़दीक,

मेन रोहतक रोड,,

चरखी दादरी,

िजला िभवानी – 127306,

ह!रयाणा

पूवढिलत कं$ट

पाइप (बलन सिहत

और रिहत)

458

-

-

2003

17.

एल-

9590002719

24.08.2017

मै0 ओम िशवशंकर h वैलस,

शॉप नं0 549, सारन  कूल

रोड,

िबq ट  कूल के नज़दीक,

पवितया कालोनी,

िजला फरीदाबाद – 121005,

ह!रयाणा

 वण एवं  वण

िम8धातु

आभूषण/िश प

व तुx –

महीनता एवं

मुहरांकन

1417

-

-

2016

70

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

18.

एल-

9512387424

25.08.2017

मै0 8ी राजनाथ कं$ट उYोग,

िसवानी राजगढ़ रोड,

गौशाला के नज़दीक, िसवानी,

िजला िभवानी - 127046,

ह!रयाणा

खड़ंजे के िलए पूव

ढिलत कं$ट r लॉक

15658

-

-

2006

[सं. सीएमडी/13 : 11]

एस. के. वमा, वैJािनक ई एवं मुख

MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

(Department of Consumer Affairs)

(BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS)

New Delhi, the 22nd December, 2017

S.O. 46.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (5) of the regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards

(Certification) Regulation 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies the grant of licence particulars of

which are given in the following schedule:

SCHEDULE

Sl.

No.

Licences

No.

CM/L-

Grant Date

Name & Address of the

Licensee

Title of the Standard

IS

No.

Part

Sec.

Year

1.

L-

9512387222

03.08.2017

M/s.. Henna Industries (P)

Ltd.,

Plot No. 45, Sector – 27A,

Distt. Faridabad - 121003,

Haryana

Oxidation Hair Dyes,

Liquid, Gel and

Cream

8481

-

-

2001

2.

L-

9512386523

08.08.2017

M/s. Atma So Parmatma

Trading,

Loharu Road, Siwani Mandi,

Siwani,

Distt. Bhiwani,

Haryana

Precast Concrete

Blocks for Paving

15658

-

-

2006

3.

L-

9512386725

08.08.2017

M/s. EAU Bathing Solutions

Pvt. Ltd.,

Binola Industrial Area, Bhora

Kalan,

Faruk Nagar,

Distt. Gurgaon - 122413,

Haryana

Copper Alloy Fancy

Single Taps,

Combination tap

assembly and

stop valve for water

services

8931

-

-

1993

4.

L-

9590001818

08.08.2017

M/s. Neeraj Jewelers,

7271, Gur Bazar,

Distt. Rewari - 123401,

Haryana

Gold and Gold

Alloys

Jewellery/Artefacts -

Fineness and

Marking

1417

-

-

2016

5.

L-

9590001919

08.08.2017

M/s. Babu Lal Rajesh Kumar

Soni,

Bura Bazar,

Distt. Rewari,

Haryana

Gold and Gold

Alloys

Jewellery/Artefacts -

Fineness and

Marking

1417

-

-

2016

6.

L-

9590002020

08.08.2017

M/s. Babu Lal Rajesh Kumar

Soni,

Bura Bazar,

Distt. Rewari,

Haryana

Silver and Silver

Alloys

Jewellery/Artefacts -

Fineness and

Marking

2112

-

-

2014

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

71

7.

L-

9590002121

08.08.2017

M/s. Dalip Jewellers,

Ward No.3, Todapur Road,

Haily Mandi,

Distt. Gurgaon,

Haryana

Gold and Gold

Alloys

Jewellery/Artefacts -

Fineness and

Marking

1417

-

-

2016

8.

L-

9590002222

08.08.2017

M/s. Deep Jewellers,

Gur Bazar,

Distt. Rewari - 123401,

Haryana

Gold and Gold

Alloys

Jewellery/Artefacts -

Fineness and

Marking

1417

-

-

2016

9.

L-

9590002323

08.08.2017

M/s. Deep Jewellers,

Gur Bazar,

Distt. Rewari - 123401,

Haryana

Silver and Silver

Alloys

Jewellery/Artefacts -

Fineness and

Marking

2112

-

-

2014

10.

L-

9590002424

08.08.2017

M/s. Dalip Jewellers,

Ward No.3, Todapur Road,

Haily Mandi,

Distt. Gurgaon,

Haryana

Silver and Silver

Alloys

Jewellery/Artefacts -

Fineness and

Marking

2112

-

-

2014

11.

L-

9590002517

16.08.2017

M/s. Shri Ji Jewellers,

Shop No.H-1, Basement,

Lala Maniram Market 2nd,

Main Bazar, Dharuhera,

Distt. Rewari - 123106,

Haryana

Gold and Gold

Alloys

Jewellery/Artefacts -

Fineness and

Marking

1417

-

-

2116

12.

L-

9512386919

17.08.2017

M/s. Aravali Co-Operative

Labour Construction Society

Ltd.,

Village & P.O. Pali, N.I.T.,

Distt. Faridabad - 121004,

Haryana

Precast Concrete

Blocks for Paving

15658

-

-

2006

13.

L-

9512387020

21.08.2017

M/s. J.M. Tiles,

Karnera, Samaypur Sohna

Road,

Near Sector – 56,

Distt. Faridabad - 121004,

Haryana

Precast Concrete

Blocks for Paving

15658

-

-

2006

14.

L-

9590002618

23.08.2017

M/s. Zever Palace,

Shop No.4A, NH-2, 1-2

Chowk, N.I.T.,

Distt. Faridabad,

Haryana

Silver and Silver

Alloys

Jewellery/Artefacts -

Fineness and

Marking

2112

-

-

2014

15.

L-

9512387121

24.08.2017

M/s. Gaurav Enterprises,

44 KM Stone,

Behind Brazar Farm House,

Village Seekri,

Distt. Faridabad,

Haryana

Precast Concrete

Blocks for Paving

15658

-

-

2006

16.

L-

9512387820

24.08.2017

M/s. Atul Pipe Corporation,

Near Railway Crossing,

Main Rohtak Road,

Charkhi Dadri,

Distt. Bhiwani – 127306,

Haryana

Precast Concrete

Pipe

(With and Without

Reinforcement)

458

-

-

2003

72

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

17.

L-

9590002719

24.08.2017

M/s. Om Shivshanker

Jewellers,

Shop No.549, Saran School

Road,

Near Bisht School, Parvatiya

Colony,

Distt. Faridabad - 121005,

Haryana

Gold and Gold

Alloys

Jewellery/Artefacts -

Fineness and

Marking

1417

-

-

2016

18.

L-

9512387424

25.08.2017

M/s. Shree Rajnath Concrete

Udyog,

Siwani Rajgarh Road,

Near Goshala, Siwani,

Distt. Bhiwani - 127046,

Haryana

Precast Concrete

Blocks for Paving

15658

-

-

2006

[No. CMD/13:11]

S. K. VERMA, Scientist E & Head

नई द ली, 22 दस बर, 2017

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 47

47

47

47.— भारतीय मानक r यूरो (माणन) िविनयम 1988 के िविनयम (4) के उपिविनयम (5) के अनुसरण मH भारतीय

मानक r यूरो एतद,ारा अिधसूिचत करता है क िजन लाइसHस% के िववरण नीचे अनुसूची मH दए गए ह, वे  वीकृत कर दए गए ह:-

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

$म

संs या

लाइसHस संs या

 वीकृत करने

क ितिथ

लाइसHसधारी का नाम

व प-ा

भारतीय मानक का

शीषक

भा मा

भाग

अनु

वष

1.

एल-

9512384721

04.07.2017

मै0 एिशयन सीमHट व\ स,

गyव मेघपुर,

पलवल सोहना रोड,

िजला पलवल - 121102,

ह!रयाणा

खड़ंजे के िलए पूव

ढिलत कं$ट r लॉक

15658

-

-

2006

2.

एल-

9590001018

04.07.2017

मै0 ओमेज़ h वैलरी ाइवेट

िलिम!टड,

1269, सै\ टर-4,

िजला गुड़गyव - 122001,

ह!रयाणा

 वण एवं  वण

िम8धातु

आभूषण/िश प

व तुx –

महीनता एवं

मुहरांकन

1417

-

-

2016

3.

एल-

9590001119

04.07.2017

मै0 शुभम h वैलस,

गांधी चाक, सदर बाज़ार,

िजला गुड़गyव - 122001,

ह!रयाणा

 वण एवं  वण

िम8धातु

आभूषण/िश प

व तुx –

महीनता एवं

मुहरांकन

1417

-

-

2016

4.

एल-

9590001220

04.07.2017

मै0 शुभम h वैलस,

गांधी चौक, सदर बाज़ार,

िजला गुड़गyव - 122001,

ह!रयाणा

चyदी एवं चyदी

िम8धातु

आभूषण/िश प

व तुx –

महीनता एवं

मुहरांकन

2112

-

-

2014

5.

एल-

9590001321

04.07.2017

मै0 शगुन h वैलस,

रेलवे रोड,

 वण एवं  वण

िम8धातु

आभूषण/िश प

1417

-

-

2016

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

73

िजला रोहतक - 124001,

ह!रयाणा

व तुx –

महीनता एवं

मुहरांकन

6.

एल-

9512384822

10.07.2017

मै0 खतरी इ5 टरलो~कंग

टाइ स,

वीपीओ खरक जटान, महम

मीनार के नज़दीक, बसी,

मेहम,

िजला रोहतक - 124514,

ह!रयाणा

खड़ंजे के िलए पूव

ढिलत कं$ट r लॉक

15658

-

-

2006

7.

एल-

9512384923

10.07.2017

मै0 राणा एG ड कौिशक

ुप,

कला नं0 20/2, मु तकल

नं0 47, गyव हरच5 द पुर,

सोहना,

िजला गुड़गyव,

ह!रयाणा

पैकेजब5 द पेय जल

(पैकेजब5 द ाकृितक

िमनरल जल के

अलावा)

14543

-

-

2004

8.

एल-

9512385622

10.07.2017

मै0 जे. के. सीमHट वक स,

झाड़ली मोहनबारी रोड,

झाड़ली, माटनहेल,

झाड़ली,

िजला झh जर - 124106,

ह!रयाणा

साधारण पोटलड

सीमHट

269

-

-

2015

9.

एल-

9512385723

10.07.2017

मै0 8ी जी ीका ट,

गyव व डाकघर िसदीपुरा

लोवा,

बहादुरगढ़,

िजला झh जर -- 124507,

ह!रयाणा

पूव ढिलत कं$ट

मेनहोल के ढ\ कन व

€ेम

12592

-

-

2002

10.

एल-

9512385024

11.07.2017

मै0 8ी f याम

इ5 टराइिसस,

एनएच-2, राज थान

मोटल के सामने,

होडल,

िजला पलवल – 121106,

ह!रयाणा

खड़ंजे के िलए पूव

ढिलत कं$ट r लॉक

15658

-

-

2006

11.

एल-

9512385117

13.07.2017

मै0 8ी बालाजी

इ5 टरलो~कंग टाइ स,

वी. पी. ओ. भलोट,

िजला रोहतक,

ह!रयाणा

खड़ंजे के िलए पूव

ढिलत कं$ट r लॉक

15658

-

-

2006

12.

एल-

9590001422

13.07.2017

मै0 सतगुg h वैलस,

ओ ड अनाज मG डी, मेहम,

िजला िभवानी -

 वण एवं  वण

िम8धातु

आभूषण/िश प

1417

-

-

2016

74

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

124112,

ह!रयाणा

व तुx –

महीनता एवं

मुहरांकन

13.

एल-

9512385218

14.07.2017

मै0 8ी ओम इ5 टराइिसस,

गyव का5 हावास, पी ओ

संगवारी,

िजला रेवाड़ी – 123401,

ह!रयाणा

खड़ंजे के िलए पूव

ढिलत कं$ट r लॉक

15658

-

-

2006

14.

एल-

9512385319

14.07.2017

मै0 यादव लो~कंग टाइ स

एG ड िबFडंग मैटी!रयल

सपलायर,

गyव सादत नगर,

तहसील कोसली,

िजला रेवाड़ी - 123302,

ह!रयाणा

खड़ंजे के िलए पूव

ढिलत कं$ट r लॉक

15658

-

-

2006

15.

एल-

9512385420

14.07.2017

मै0 जय दुग कं$ट उYोग,

गyव घरौट, तहसील हथीन,

िजला पलवल - 121103,

ह!रयाणा

खड़ंजे के िलए पूव

ढिलत कं$ट r लॉक

15658

-

-

2006

16.

एल-

9512385521

17.07.2017

मै0 ह!रयाणा इलै\ Wीकल

इ\ यूपमHट,

खसरा नंo 104/55,

कला नंo 9/3/1, गyव-

ढोरका, वज़ीरपुर,

िजला गुड़गyव - 123505,

ह!रयाणा

बाहय रंग तेल

इ मेसड िवतरण

Wांसफामर भाग 1

िमनरल तेल

िनिमि‚त

1180

01

-

2014

17.

एल-

9512385925

17.07.2017

मै0 टी.एम.एस.

इ5 टराइिसस,

वीपीओ-लुहारी,

िजला झh जर - 124108,

ह!रयाणा

खड़ंजे के िलए पूव

ढिलत कं$ट r लॉक

15658

-

-

2006

18.

एल-

9512386624

17.07.2017

मै0 बीकेडी बैवरेिजस,

गyव धनकोट, झh जर रोड,

िजला गुड़गyव - 122505,

ह!रयाणा

पैकेजब5 द य जल

(पैकेजब5 द ाकृितक

िमनरल जल के

अलावा)

14543

-

-

2004

19.

एल-

9590001523

17.07.2017

मै0 एम. एल. h वैलस ,

शॉप नं0 एमसीएफ-3712,

33 फुट रोड,

संजय कलोनी, सै\ टर-23,

िजला फरीदाबाद -

121005,

ह!रयाणा

 वण एवं  वण

िम8धातु

आभूषण/िश प

व तुx –

महीनता एवं

मुहरांकन

1417

-

-

2016

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

75

20.

एल-

9590001624

17.07.2017

मै0 एम. एल. h वैलस ,

शॉप नं0 एमसीएफ-3712,

33 फुट रोड,

संजय कलोनी, सै\ टर-23,

िजला फरीदाबाद -

121005,

ह!रयाणा

चyदी एवं चyदी

िम8धातु

आभूषण/िश प

व तुx –

महीनता एवं

मुहरांकन

2112

-

-

2014

21.

एल-

9512385824

24.07.2017

मै0 अ Wाकोन इ5 €ाकेम

(ाo) िलo,

n लॉट नंo 5ए, सै\ टर - 79,

गyव नौरंगपुर,

िजला गुड़गyव - 122050,

ह!रयाणा

कं$ट एडिम\  चर

9103

-

-

1999

22.

एल-

9512386119

25.07.2017

मै0 यूनीक टाइ स

इG ड Wीस,

गyव गरही बोहार,

पी.ओ. अ थल बोहार,

िजला रोहतक - 124521,

ह!रयाणा

खड़ंजे के िलए पूव

ढिलत कं$ट r लॉक

15658

-

-

2006

23.

एल-

9512386321

25.07.2017

मै0 पूजा टाइ स,

गyव नसीबपुर, बरखोदा,

तहसील नारनौल,

िजला महै5 6गढ़ -

123001,

ह!रयाणा

खड़ंजे के िलए पूव

ढिलत कं$ट r लॉक

15658

-

-

2006

24

एल-

9512386018

26.07.2017

मै0 इG डो िसयाम सेफटी

ोड\ टस ाइवेट

िलिम!टड,

n लॉट नं0 149, दूसरा तल,

सै\ टर-7, आईएमटी

मानेसर,

िजला गुड़गyव - 122050,

ह!रयाणा

दुपिहया वाहन

चालक% के िलए

संरƒी हे मेट

4151

-

-

1993

25.

एल-

9512386220

26.07.2017

मै0 8ी f याम टाइ स एG ड

मैटी!रयल सपलायर,

खाता नं0 421/457,

न5 दरामपुर बास, सलारपुर

मोड़,

धाgहेड़ा,

िजला रेवाड़ी – 123106,

ह!रयाणा

खड़ंजे के िलए पूव

ढिलत कं$ट r लॉक

15658

-

-

2006

76

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

26.

एल-

9512386422

27.07.2017

मै0 िज5 दल सैनीटेरीवेयर

ा0 िल0,

3 केएम माइल  टोन,

वीपीओ रोहद,

िजला झh जर - 124501,

ह!रयाणा

कं$ट एडिम\  चर -

सुपर

n ला टीसाइF़जंग

िम8ण (कं$ट

िम8ण के िलए पानी

कम) - सामा5 य

कार

7834

01

-

1987

27.

एल-

9512386826

27.07.2017

मै0 जय बाबा WेFडंग कं0,

चरखी दादरी लाहाg रोड,

गyव हरोदा कलां,

तहसील चरखी दादरी,

िजला िभवानी –

127308,

ह!रयाणा

खड़ंजे के िलए पूव

ढिलत कं$ट r लॉक

15658

-

-

2006

28.

एल-

9590001717

27.07.2017

मै0 राजदीप h वैलस,

5 यू सराफर बाज़ार,

बारा हज़ारी रोड,

िजला रेवाड़ी - 123401,

ह!रयाणा

 वण एवं  वण

िम8धातु

आभूषण/िश प

व तुx –

महीनता एवं

मुहरांकन

1417

-

-

2016

[सं. सीएमडी/13 : 11]

एस. के. वमा, वैJािनक ई एवं मुख

New Delhi, the 22nd December, 2017

S.O. 47.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (5) of the regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards

(Certification) Regulation 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies the grant of licence particulars of

which are given in the following schedule:

SCHEDULE

Sl.

No.

Licences

No.

CM/L-

Grant Date

Name & Address of the

Licensee

Title of the Standard

IS

No.

Part

Sec.

Year

1.

L-

9512384721

04.07.2017

M/s Asian Cement Works,

Village Meghpur,

Palwal Sohna Road,

Distt. Palwal - 121102,

Haryana

Precast Concrete

Blocks for Paving

15658

-

-

2006

2.

L-

9590001018

04.07.2017

M/s Ornaz Jewellery Private

Limited,

1269, Sector-4,

Distt. Gurgaon - 122001,

Haryana

Gold and Gold Alloys

Jewellery/Artefacts -

Fineness and Marking

1417

-

-

2016

3.

L-

9590001119

04.07.2017

M/s Shubham Jewellers,

Gandhi Chowk, Sadar

Bazar,

Distt. Gurgaon - 122001,

Haryana

Gold and Gold Alloys

Jewellery/Artefacts -

Fineness and Marking

1417

-

-

2016

4.

L-

9590001220

04.07.2017

M/s Shubham Jewellers,

Gandhi Chowk, Sadar

Bazar,

Distt. Gurgaon - 122001,

Silver and Silver

Alloys

Jewellery/Artefacts -

Fineness and Marking

2112

-

-

2014

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

77

Haryana

5.

L-

9590001321

04.07.2017

M/s Shagun Jewellers,

Railway Road,

Distt. Rohtak - 124001,

Haryana

Gold and Gold Alloys

Jewellery/Artefacts -

Fineness and Marking

1417

-

-

2016

6.

L-

9512384822

10.07.2017

M/s Khatri Interlocking

Tiles,

VPO Kharak Jatan,

Near Mahan Miner, Bainsi,

Meham,

Kharak,

Distt. Bhiwani - 124514,

Haryana

Precast Concrete

Blocks for Paving

15658

-

-

2006

7.

L-

9512384923

10.07.2017

M/s Rana & Kaushik

Group,

Kila No. 20/2, Mustkil No.

47, Village Harchand Pur,

Sohna,

Distt. Gurgaon,

Haryana

Packaged Drinking

Water (Other Than

Packaged Natural

Mineral Water)

14543

-

-

2004

8.

L-

9512385622

10.07.2017

M/s J.K. Cement Works,

Jharli Mohanbari Road,

Jharli, Matanhail,

Jharli,

Distt. Jhajjar - 124106,

Haryana

Ordinary Portland

Cement

269

-

-

2015

9.

L-

9512385723

10.07.2017

M/s Shree Jee Precast,

V & P.O. Siddipura Lowa,

Bahadurgarh,

Distt. Jhajjar -- 124507,

Haryana

Precast Manhole

Cover and Frame

12592

-

-

2002

10.

L-

9512385024

11.07.2017

M/s Shree Shyam

Enterprises,

NH-2, Opp. Rajesthan

Motel,

Hodal,

Distt. Palwal - 121106,

Haryana

Precast Concrete

Blocks for Paving

15658

-

-

2006

11.

L-

9512385117

13.07.2017

M/s Shree Balaji

Interlocking Tiles,

V P O-Bhalot,

Bhalot,

Distt. Palwal,

Haryana

Precast Concrete

Blocks for Paving

15658

-

-

2006

12.

L-

9590001422

13.07.2017

M/s Satguru Jewellers,

Old Anaj Mandi, Meham,

Distt. Bhiwani - 124112,

Haryana

Gold and Gold Alloys

Jewellery/Artefacts -

Fineness and Marking

1417

-

-

2016

13.

L-

9512385218

14.07.2017

M/s Shree Om Enterprises,

Village Kanhawas, P.O.

Sangwari,

Distt. Rewari – 123401,

Haryana

Precast Concrete

Blocks for Paving

15658

-

-

2006

14.

L-

9512385319

14.07.2017

M/s Yadav Locking Tiles &

Building

Material Supplier,

Village Sadat Nagar, Tehsil

Precast Concrete

Blocks for Paving

15658

-

-

2006

78

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Kosli,

Kosli,

Distt. Rewari - 123302,

Haryana

15.

L-

9512385420

14.07.2017

M/s Jai Durge Concrete

Udyog,

Village Gharrot, Tehsil

Hathine,

Hathine,

Distt. Palwal - 121103,

Haryana

Precast Concrete

Blocks for Paving

15658

-

-

2006

16.

L-

9512385521

17.07.2017

M/s Haryana Electrical

Equipment,

Khasra No. 104/55, Kila

No. 9/3/1, Village Dhorka,

Wazipur,

Distt. Gurgaon - 123505,

Haryana

Outdoor Type Oil

Immersed Distribution

Transformers,

Part 1: Minerals Oil

Immersed

1180

01

-

2014

17.

L-

9512385925

17.07.2017

M/s T.M.S. Enterprises,

VPO-Luhari,

Distt. Jhajjar - 124108,

Haryana

Precast Concrete

Blocks for Paving

15658

-

-

2006

18.

L-

9512386624

17.07.2017

M/s BKD Beverages,

Village Dhankot, Jhajjar

Road,

Distt. Gurgaon - 122505,

Haryana

Packaged Drinking

Water (Other Than

Packaged Natural

Mineral Water)

14543

-

-

2004

19.

L-

9590001523

17.07.2017

M/s M.L. Jewellers,

Shop No.MCF-3712, 33 ft

Road,

Sanjay Colony, Sector-23,

Distt. Faridabad - 121005,

Haryana

Gold and Gold Alloys

Jewellery/Artefacts -

Fineness and Marking

1417

-

-

2016

20.

L-

9590001624

17.07.2017

M/s M.L. Jewellers,

Shop No.MCF-3712, 33 ft

Road,

Sanjay Colony, Sector-23,

Distt. Faridabad - 121005,

Haryana

Silver and Silver

Alloys

Jewellery/Artefacts -

Fineness and Marking

2112

-

-

2014

21.

L-

9512385824

24.07.2017

M/s Ultracon Infrachem (P)

Limited,

422/38, Rajiv Colony,

Opp. Hotel Melfort, N.H.8,

Distt. Gurgaon – 122001,

Haryana

Concrete Admixtures

9103

-

-

1999

22.

L-

9512386119

25.07.2017

M/s Unique Tiles Industries,

Village Garhi Bohar,

P.O. Asthal Bohar,

Distt. Rohtak, - 124521,

Haryana

Precast Concrete

Blocks for Paving

15658

-

-

2006

23.

L-

9512386321

25.07.2017

M/s Pooja Tiles,

Village Nasibpur,

Barkhoda,

Tehsil Narnaul,

Distt. Maherdragarh -

123001,

Haryana

Precast Concrete

Blocks for Paving

15658

-

-

2006

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

79

24.

L-9512386018

26.07.2017

M/s Indo Siam Safety

Products Private Limited,

Plot No. 149, 2nd Floor,

Sector-7, IMT Manesar,

Distt. Gurgaon - 122050,

Haryana

Protective Helmets for

Two Wheeler Riders

4151

-

-

1993

25.

L-9512386220

26.07.2017

M/s Shree Shyam Tile &

Material Supplier,

Khata No. 421/457,

Nandrampur Bas, Salarpur

Mod,

Dharuhera,

Distt. Rewari – 123106,

Haryana

Precast Concrete

Blocks for Paving

15658

-

-

2006

26.

L-9512386422

27.07.2017

M/s Jindal Sanitaryware

Pvt. Ltd.,

3 KM Mile Stone, VPO

Rohad,

Rohad,

Distt. Jhajjar - 124501,

Haryana

Injection Moulded

PVC Socket Fittings

with Solvent Cement

Joints for Water

Supplies

7834

01

-

1987

27.

L-9512386826

27.07.2017

M/s Jai Balaji Trading Co.,

Charkhi Dadri Loharu

Road,

Vill. Haroda Kalan,

Teh. Charkhi Dadri,

Charkhi Dadri,

Distt. Bhiwani – 127308,

Haryana

Precast Concrete

Blocks for Paving

15658

-

-

2006

28.

L-9590001717

27.07.2017

M/s Rajdeep Jewellers,

New Sarafa Bazar,

Bara Hazari Road,

Distt. Rewari - 123401,

Haryana

Gold and Gold Alloys

Jewellery/Artefacts -

Fineness and Marking

1417

-

-

2016

[No. CMD/13:11]

S. K. VERMA, Scientist E & Head

नई द ली, 22 दस बर, 2017

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 48

48

48

48.— भारतीय मानक r यूरो (माणन) िविनयम, 1988 के िविनयम (5) के उपिविनयम (6) के अनुसरण मH भारतीय

मानक r यूरो एत7ारा अिधसूिचत करता है क िन न िववरण वाले लाइसHस% को उनके आगे दशायी गई तारीख से रद्द / थिगत कर दया

गया है :-

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

$म

संs या

लाइसHस संs या

सीएम/एल

लाइसHसधारी का नाम व प-ा

लाइसHस के अ5 तगत व तु/$म

स बT भारतीय मानक का

शीषक

रद करने क ितिथ

01

एल-9951304

मै0 मंगला पोलीमस,

रसूलपुर, रेलवे $ोFसंग के नज़दीक,

िजला पलवल – 121102,

ह!रयाणा

क5 डयूटस फॉर इलै\ Wीकल

इ5 सटालेशनंस भाग 3- !रिजड

n लेन क5 डयूटस ऑफ द5 सूले…टंग

मैटी!रयलस

आई एस 9537(भाग 3):1983

25.07.2017

[सं. सीएमडी/13:13]

एस. के. वमा, वैJािनक ई एवं मुख

80

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 22nd December, 2017

S.O.

S.O.

S.O.

S.O. 48

48

48

48.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (6) of the regulation 5 of the Bureau of Indian Standards

(Certification) Regulations 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies that the licences particulars of

which are given below have been cancelled/suspended with effect from the date indicated against each:

SCHEDULE

Sl.

No.

Licences No.

CM/L-

Name & Address

of the Licensee

Article/Process with relevant Indian

Standards covered by the licence

Cancelled/suspension

Date of Cancellation

01

L-9951304

M/s Mangla Polymers,

Rasulpur, Near Railway

Crossing,

Distt. Palwal - 121102,

Haryana

Conduits for Electrical Installation

Part 3: Rigid Plain Conduits of

Insulating Materials

IS 9537(Pt. 3):1983

25.07.2017

[No. CMD/13:13]

S. K. VERMA, Scientist E & Head

नई द ली, 22 दस बर, 2017

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 49

49

49

49.— भारतीय मानक r यूरो (माणन) िविनयम, 1988 के िविनयम (5) के उपिविनयम (6) के अनुसरण मH भारतीय

मानक r यूरो एत7ारा अिधसूिचत करता है क िन न िववरण वाले लाइसHस% को उनके आगे दशायी गई तारीख से रद्द / थिगत कर दया

गया है :-

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

$.

सं.

लाइसHस सं

सी एम/

एल-

लाइसHसधारी का नाम व पता

लाइसHस के अंतगत वतु/ $म स बT भारतीय

मानक का शीषक

र† होने क

ितिथ

शू5य

[सं. सीएमडी/13:13]

एस. के. वमा, वैJािनक ई एवं मुख

New Delhi, the 22nd December, 2017

S.O.

S.O.

S.O.

S.O. 49

49

49

49.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (6) of the regulation 5 of the Bureau of Indian Standards

(Certification) Regulations 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies that the licences particulars of

which are given below have been cancelled/suspended with effect from the date indicated against each:

SCHEDULE

Sl.

No.

Licence No.

CM/L-

Name & Address of the Licensee

Article/ Process with relevant

Indian Standard covered by the

licence cancelled/suspension

Date of

Cancellation

NIL

[No. CMD/13:13]

S. K. VERMA, Scientist E & Head

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

81

पे)ोिलयम और *ाकृितक गैस मंालय

पे)ोिलयम और *ाकृितक गैस मंालय

पे)ोिलयम और *ाकृितक गैस मंालय

पे)ोिलयम और *ाकृितक गैस मंालय

नई द ली, 4 जनवरी, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 50

50

50

50.— के56ीय सरकार ने पेWोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूिम मH उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन) अिधिनयम,

1962 (1962 का 50) (िजसे इसमH इसके प‡ात उ0 अिधिनयम कहा गया है) क धारा 3 उप धारा (1) के अधीन जारी क गई, भारत

सरकार के पेWोिलयम और ाकृितक गैस मंKालय क अिधसूचना िजसका काशन भारत के राजपK संsया 35 दनांक 02.09.2017

का.आ संsया 2016 दनांक 23.08.2017, भाग II, खGड 3, उप-खGड (II) मH कया गया है। इस अिधसूचना से संलˆ अनुसूची मH

िविनzदp पंजाब राhय क तहसील नवांशहर, िजला शहीद भगत Fसंह नगर तथा तहसील गढ़शंकर, िजला होिशयारपुर क भूिम मH,

पंजाब राhय के गाँव

: झुिगयां : िजला शहीद भगत Fसंह नगर से िहमाचल देश के गाँव : पेखुबेला, िजला उना तक पैWोिलयम उVपाद% के

प!रवहन के िलए इंिडयन ऑइल कापOरेशन िलिमटेड ,ारा पीएजेपीएल - उना Šांच पाइपलाइन प!रयोजना के स बंध मH पाइपलाइन

िबछाने के योजन के िलए उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन करने के िलए अपने आशय क घोषणा क थी।

और उ0 राजपK अिधसूचना‹ क ितयाँ जनता को तारीख 23.11.2017 तक उपलrध करा दी गई थी।

और उ0 अिधिनयम क धारा 6 क उपधारा (1) के अनुसरण मH सƒम ािधकारी ने के56ीय सरकार को अपनी !रपोट दे दी है।

और के56ीय सरकार ने उ0 !रपोट पर िवचार करने के प‡ात और यह समाधान हो जाने पर क उ0 भूिम पाइपलाइन

िबछाने के िलए अपेिƒत है, उसमH उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन करने का िविन‡य कया है।

अत: अब, के56ीय सरकार उ0 अिधिनयम क धारा 6 क उपधारा (1) ,ारा द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए यह घोषणा

करती है क इस अिधसूचना से संलˆ अनुसूची मH िविनzदp भूिम मH पाइपलाइन िबछाने के उपयोग का अिधकार अNजत कया जाए।

और के56ीय सरकार उ0 अिधिनयम क धारा 6 क उपधारा (4) ,ारा द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए, यह िनदश देती है

क उ0 भूिम मH उपयोग का अिधकार इस घोषणा के काशन क तारीख से के56ीय सरकार मH िनिहत होने के बजाय सभी िवलंगम% से

मु0 होकर इंिडयन ऑयल कापOरेशन िलिमटेड मH िनिहत होगा।

पेWोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन अिधिनयम 1962 क धारा 10 के अधीन कसी भी ƒितपूNत के िलए इंिडयन ऑयल

कापOरेशन िलिमटेड पूणतया उ-रदायी होगी और पाइपलाईन से स बि5धत कसी भी मामलH पर के56ीय सरकार के िवŒT कोई वाद

दावा या कानूनी कायवाही नहk हो सकेगी।

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

राhय : पंजाब

$ं.

सं.

िजला

तहसील

गाँव का नाम

हदबत

नं

मुरrबा // कला

तथा खसरा सं.

ƒेKफल

हे\टेयर

एयर

वग मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1

एस. बी. एस. नगर

नवांशहर

झुिगयां

285

12 // 1

00

03

18

6 // 25/2

00

00

20

5 // 21

00

08

79

5 // 22

00

13

17

5 // 23

00

04

55

5 // 19/2

00

00

20

5 // 18/2

00

08

30

5 // 17/1

00

01

76

82

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

5 // 17/2

00

11

23

5 // 16

00

08

79

5 // 15

00

03

55

4 // 20

00

00

28

4 // 11

00

12

93

4 // 12

00

12

08

4 // 13

00

03

01

4 // 9/1

00

00

26

4 // 8

00

09

82

4 // 7

00

06

65

38 राता

00

02

46

2

एस. बी. एस. नगर

नवांशहर

जुलाह माजरा

286

54 // 8

00

00

20

79/1 राता

00

00

32

54 // 7

00

07

76

54 // 4

00

00

81

54 // 6

00

01

69

54 // 5/2

00

12

50

53 //1

00

00

83

3

एस. बी. एस. नगर

नवांशहर

खोजा

284

22 // 6

00

00

20

21 // 1

00

11

55

21 // 2

00

01

60

9 // 21

00

01

13

9 // 22

00

11

27

9 // 23

00

12

69

9 // 24

00

07

50

9 // 17

00

05

80

9 // 16

00

13

26

10 // 20

00

11

79

10 // 11

00

00

61

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

83

10 // 12

00

10

33

10 // 19

00

02

30

10 // 13

00

13

01

10 // 14

00

07

84

10 // 15

00

00

20

10 // 7

00

05

05

10 // 6

00

12

59

11 // 10

00

12

44

11 // 9

00

03

23

11 // 1

00

00

26

11 // 2

00

09

88

11 // 3

00

12

46

11 // 4

00

09

31

11 // 5

00

00

20

7 // 24

00

03

91

7 // 25

00

13

31

6 // 21

00

11

13

6 // 22

00

00

79

6 // 20

00

01

70

6 // 19

00

11

60

6 // 18

00

12

86

6 // 17

00

06

48

6 // 14

00

06

35

6 // 15

00

12

99

5 // 11/1

00

08

72

5 // 11/2

00

00

64

5 // 11/3

00

02

53

98 राता

00

00

82

5 // 28

00

01

64

84

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

5 // 12/1

00

02

08

5 // 12/2

00

00

98

5 // 9/2

00

08

58

62

00

01

55

5 // 8

00

09

64

5 // 7

00

12

28

5 // 6

00

11

14

4 // 10/2/1

00

05

80

4 // 10/2/2

00

03

89

4 // 10/1

00

02

71

4 // 9

00

06

63

4

एस. बी. एस. नगर

नवांशहर

ताजपुर

283

27 // 2

00

00

20

27 // 9

00

02

43

27 // 3

00

02

73

27 // 4

00

07

68

27 // 5

00

11

55

27 // 8

00

09

51

27 // 7

00

04

82

27 // 6

00

00

78

26 // 1

00

12

76

26 // 2/1

00

06

07

46 राता

00

00

20

45 राता

00

02

47

26 // 2/3

00

03

96

26 // 3

00

07

55

5

एस. बी. एस. नगर

नवांशहर

लालेवाल

282

6 // 3

00

04

53

6 // 4

00

12

31

6 // 5

00

07

27

1 // 25

00

06

01

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

85

2 // 21

00

08

86

6

एस. बी. एस. नगर

नवांशहर

गडी भारटी

218

55 // 6

00

09

62

85 राता

00

01

21

56 // 10

00

13

76

7

एस. बी. एस. नगर

नवांशहर

भारटा कलां

219

53 // 9

00

09

98

53 // 8

00

12

19

53 // 7

00

12

09

53 // 4

00

00

20

53 // 5

00

02

02

53 // 6

00

10

30

52 // 1

00

06

84

52 // 10

00

05

29

52 // 2

00

11

40

52 // 9

00

00

53

52 // 3

00

12

14

52 // 4/2

00

12

23

52 // 5/1

00

05

73

52 // 5/2

00

03

41

52 // 5/3

00

03

16

51 // 1/1

00

01

41

51 // 1/2

00

09

00

51 // 2/1

00

09

81

51 // 2/2

00

02

32

51 // 3/1

00

11

95

51 // 4

00

08

00

51 // 5

00

01

12

46 // 23

00

00

39

46 // 24

00

06

06

46 // 25

00

11

51

86

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

47 // 21

00

11

40

राता

00

01

06

47 // 22

00

12

37

47 // 23

00

11

73

47 // 18

00

00

20

47 // 17

00

03

90

47 // 24

00

08

52

47 // 25

00

02

12

47 // 16

00

10

27

48 // 20

00

11

91

48 // 19/2

00

11

82

48 // 18

00

11

39

8

एस. बी. एस. नगर

नवांशहर

दरीयापुर

278

15 // 18

00

00

68

15 // 17

00

11

27

15 // 14

00

01

17

15 // 15

00

07

20

15 // 16

00

05

60

14 // 20/2

00

00

51

14 // 11/1

00

03

50

33 राता

00

01

48

14 // 11/2

00

06

93

14 // 20/1/1

00

00

20

14 // 12

00

12

59

14 // 26

00

00

95

14 // 13/1

00

01

10

14 // 13/2

00

10

71

14 // 14

00

12

14

14 // 15

00

12

05

13 // 11/1

00

03

85

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

87

13 // 10/2

00

00

20

43 राता

00

07

12

13 // 10/1

00

00

20

13 // 11/2

00

05

86

13 // 12

00

05

59

13 // 13/1

00

00

68

13 // 9/1

00

03

78

13 // 8/1

00

09

50

13 // 7/1

00

12

47

13 // 6/1

00

12

46

12 // 26

00

03

35

12 // 10/1

00

08

90

12 // 9/1

00

12

88

12 // 8/1

00

10

63

12 // 3

00

01

60

12 // 4

00

07

66

12 // 5

00

04

26

12 // 6

00

00

22

12 // 7/1

00

04

99

9

एस. बी. एस. नगर

नवांशहर

काहल%

222

69 // 5

00

07

45

69 // 6

00

00

27

70 // 1/1

00

07

60

70 // 1/2

00

04

42

70 // 2

00

11

94

70 // 3

00

10

70

132 राता

00

01

37

70 // 4

00

11

85

70 // 5

00

11

90

67 // 25

00

00

21

88

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

71 // 1

00

07

87

71 // 2

00

01

98

66 // 21

00

03

99

66 // 22

00

10

54

66 // 23/1

00

06

38

66 // 23/2

00

06

09

66 // 24

00

11

83

66 // 25

00

11

73

65 // 20

00

00

20

65 // 21

00

10

10

65 // 19

00

02

90

65 // 22

00

08

67

65 // 18

00

08

78

65 // 23

00

03

01

65 //24

00

00

20

65 // 17

00

12

14

65 // 16

00

11

50

124 राता

00

01

51

64 // 20

00

10

74

64 // 19

00

12

13

64 // 18

00

11

75

64 // 13

00

00

20

64 // 14

00

03

28

64 // 17

00

08

77

64 // 15

00

02

07

64 // 16

00

01

27

10

एस. बी. एस. नगर

नवांशहर

गडी फ़तेह खां

273

5 // 15

00

06

19

5 // 6

00

01

79

4 // 11/1

00

00

87

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

89

4 // 10/2

00

12

26

4 // 9

00

12

76

4 // 2/3

00

00

20

4 // 8/2

00

04

16

4 // 8/3

00

00

20

4 // 3/1

00

06

76

4 // 3/2

00

01

13

4 // 4

00

08

19

11

एस. बी. एस. नगर

नवांशहर

पलीयां खुद

225

37 // 24

00

03

41

37 // 17

00

00

69

37 // 16

00

00

82

12

एस. बी. एस. नगर

नवांशहर

पलीयाँ कलां

226

39 // 16/2

00

09

33

39 // 16/1

00

00

91

39 // 15

00

00

81

38 // 20

00

00

81

38 // 11

00

14

28

38 // 10/2

00

00

55

53/3 राता

00

01

81

38 // 12

00

00

22

38 // 9

00

13

21

38 // 2

00

00

50

38 // 8

00

01

23

38 // 3

00

14

62

38 // 4

00

01

10

35 // 23

00

00

62

35 // 24

00

14

60

35 // 25

00

00

65

35 // 17

00

00

99

35 // 16

00

13

27

90

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

35 // 15/3

00

01

88

36 // 20

00

00

20

36 // 11/2

00

11

06

36 // 10/1/2

00

00

72

36 // 9/2

00

00

97

36 // 9/1

00

06

81

36 // 26

00

00

37

13

एस. बी. एस. नगर

नवांशहर

रामरायपुर

155

613

00

05

31

674

00

06

10

673

00

08

77

676

00

05

75

677

00

04

20

678

00

04

19

679

00

00

20

683

00

05

27

682

00

03

46

681

00

01

00

695

00

04

75

692

00

04

26

694

00

02

45

693

00

06

64

राता

00

01

14

774

00

03

59

773

00

10

56

772

00

09

05

राता

00

00

68

756

00

09

31

758

00

00

20

755

00

06

42

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

91

759

00

03

18

754

00

02

22

753

00

07

10

740

00

00

20

743

00

09

48

742

00

08

40

राता

00

00

98

425

00

09

80

421

00

09

61

422

00

00

20

403

00

09

45

367

00

08

03

366

00

02

50

365

00

00

20

14

एस. बी. एस. नगर

नवांशहर

सजावलपुर

154

591

00

00

97

579

00

07

58

578

00

08

85

573

00

03

51

574

00

04

92

572

00

13

03

558

00

07

56

557

00

03

63

778/556

00

02

93

777/556

00

00

86

535/1

00

01

94

535

00

09

80

534

00

08

64

533

00

03

91

530

00

01

00

92

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

529

00

00

20

525

00

00

20

526

00

00

20

524

00

00

20

15

एस. बी. एस. नगर

नवांशहर

सिहबाजपुर

227

2498 राता

00

01

58

2463

00

06

47

2464

00

13

10

2465

00

02

84

2467

00

00

20

2466

00

10

31

2473 राता

00

01

76

2475

00

11

67

2474

00

04

71

2670/2479

00

01

44

2669/2479

00

01

44

2482

00

06

94

2480

00

06

89

2488

00

00

20

2487

00

04

53

राता

00

00

24

2486

00

00

20

2333

00

00

85

2324

00

11

79

2325

00

06

03

2323 राता

00

01

08

2319

00

06

40

2320

00

12

25

2314

00

01

50

2321

00

00

36

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

93

2313

00

13

91

2312

00

08

99

2309 राता

00

04

83

2298

00

01

24

2297

00

07

97

2296

00

06

30

2295

00

08

16

2294

00

08

35

2289

00

06

48

2290

00

07

49

1856/508

00

01

32

2245

00

09

40

2165

00

11

82

2164

00

10

45

2163

00

13

86

2162

00

05

67

2140

00

09

01

2145

00

00

25

2144

00

08

07

2143

00

04

70

2142

00

00

33

2098

00

00

79

2105 राता

00

01

31

2125

00

10

28

2120

00

00

20

2124

00

02

25

2121

00

12

52

2118

00

02

14

2122

00

00

20

94

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2117

00

14

84

16

होिशयारपुर

गढ़शंकर

धमाई

163

2375/1978

00

13

66

2374/1978

00

01

79

1977

00

04

43

1976

00

00

61

1973

00

00

20

1975

00

03

87

1935

00

27

76

1936

00

01

54

1937/2368

00

04

42

1938

00

04

25

1947

00

01

59

2368/1943

00

07

34

1939

00

00

20

1940

00

03

75

17

होिशयारपुर

गढ़शंकर

रामगड

162

371

00

06

85

370

00

00

41

689/373

00

00

80

690/373

00

04

23

682/368

00

01

40

683/368

00

06

50

375

00

06

11

376

00

01

11

366

00

06

79

365

00

07

49

364

00

00

75

363

00

05

67

379

00

06

80

राता

00

01

17

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

95

401

00

04

37

400

00

11

44

399

00

02

19

389

00

11

91

388

00

00

20

राता

00

01

55

391

00

00

20

510

00

00

57

508

00

00

69

509

00

12

23

571/515

00

03

77

516

00

08

07

575/517

00

01

88

522

00

02

05

518

00

10

74

519

00

01

24

520

00

02

88

506

00

00

48

18

होिशयारपुर

गढ़शंकर

मौजूपुर

250

237

00

08

46

236

00

10

69

235

00

11

58

150

00

03

15

487/151

00

08

70

488/151

00

01

09

489/152

00

00

41

490/152

00

05

41

153

00

02

00

441/439

00

00

20

442/439

00

00

20

96

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

19

होिशयारपुर

गढ़शंकर

कुनैल

364

426

00

09

04

380

00

13

09

425

00

02

52

423

00

09

20

417

00

00

20

418

00

03

87

419

00

03

24

422/2

00

06

78

420

00

01

71

422/1

00

16

11

399

00

03

13

398

00

02

44

397

00

00

78

396

00

05

33

395

00

01

59

400

00

03

58

401/2

00

05

64

394

00

00

25

393/2

00

00

20

401/1

00

06

07

339/2

00

05

56

339/1

00

16

49

335

00

00

28

336

00

07

76

20

होिशयारपुर

गढ़शंकर

बारापुर

361

86 राता

00

01

42

36 // 11

00

03

78

37 // 15/2

00

03

43

37 // 15/1

00

01

32

37 // 6

00

12

93

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

97

37 // 7/1

00

00

20

37 // 5/2

00

00

22

37 // 5/1

00

01

99

37 // 4

00

10

77

30 // 24/2

00

05

72

30 // 23/3

00

00

20

318 राता

00

01

71

30 // 24/1

00

01

83

30 // 23/2

00

04

11

30 // 18/2

00

03

52

30 // 18/1

00

06

81

315 राता

00

01

80

30 // 13/2

00

00

20

30 // 13/1

00

03

07

30 // 12/3

00

06

78

30 // 12/2

00

04

56

30 // 9/2

00

00

20

30 // 9/3

00

03

83

30 // 9/5

00

00

28

30 // 9/1

00

02

89

राता

00

02

22

30 // 9/4

00

01

87

30 // 2/3

00

00

58

राता

00

00

20

30 // 2/2

00

00

20

30 // 2/1

00

09

90

30 // 1

00

00

21

19 // 22/3

00

02

73

19 // 21/2

00

02

39

98

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

19 // 22/1

00

00

38

19 // 21/1

00

06

18

19 // 20

00

11

90

19 // 11

00

10

95

19 // 10

00

02

23

राता

00

00

20

20 // 15

00

00

20

342 राता

00

02

74

20 // 6

00

07

24

20 // 5/2

00

06

01

20 // 5/1

00

05

55

12 // 25/2

00

06

10

12 // 25/1

00

05

65

12 // 28

00

00

65

12 // 24

00

00

20

12 // 16/2

00

00

26

12 // 16/3

00

02

95

12 // 17

00

07

38

12 // 14/2

00

10

22

89 राता

00

01

77

12 // 7

00

11

44

283 राता

00

00

20

12 // 4/3

00

02

19

12 // 4/2

00

10

89

12 // 5

00

00

20

6 // 24

00

02

95

6 // 25/1

00

09

24

6 // 16/2

00

01

97

6 // 16/1

00

10

16

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

99

6 // 15

00

06

24

5 // 11

00

04

44

6 // 6

00

00

20

5 // 10

00

06

80

21

होिशयारपुर

गढ़शंकर

गदीवाल

483

5 // 4

00

04

52

1 // 24/4

00

03

38

1 // 24/3

00

06

39

1 // 25/1

00

01

44

1 // 17/1

00

00

93

1 // 16/2

00

05

61

110 राता

00

00

90

1 // 16/1/2

00

01

89

1 // 16/1/1

00

02

27

1 // 15/3

00

02

73

1 // 15/2

00

09

05

2 // 11

00

00

24

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/1/2018-ओआर-I/ई-21789]

पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव

MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS

New Delhi, the 4th January, 2018

S.O. 50.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural

Gas, published in the Gazette No. 35 dated 02.09.2017, S.O. No. 2016 dated 23.08.2017 Part-II, section 3, sub-section

(ii) issued under sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in

Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) the Central Government declared its intention to

acquire the right of user in the land situated in Tehsil – Nawanshahr of District Shahid Bhagat Singh Nagar and Tehsil

– Garhshankar of District Hoshiarpur in Punjab State, specified in the schedule appended to that notification for the

purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of petroleum product from village Jhungian in the State of Punjab,

District Shahid Bhagat Singh Nagar to village Pekhubela in the State of Himachal Pradesh, District Una by the Indian

Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the "PAJPL - Una Branch pipeline project".

And whereas the copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on 23.11.2017

And whereas the Competent Authority has under sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, has submitted his

report of Central Government.

And whereas, the Central Government after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land

is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of the user therein;

100

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is

hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby directs that the right of user of the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the

Central Government, vests on the date of publication of the declaration, in India Oil Corporation Limited, free from all

encumbrances.

India Oil Corporation Limited shall be exclusively liable for any compensation in terms of section 10 of the

P & MP Act, 1962 and no suit, claim or legal proceeding would lie against the Central Government on any matter

relating to pipeline.

SCHEDULE

State : Punjab

Sr.

No.

Name of

District

Name of

Tehsil

Name of Village

Hadbast

No.

Murabba //

Killa OR

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq. mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1

S.B.S. Nagar

Nawanshahr

Jhungian

285

12 // 1

00

03

18

6 // 25/2

00

00

20

5 // 21

00

08

79

5 // 22

00

13

17

5 // 23

00

04

55

5 // 19/2

00

00

20

5 // 18/2

00

08

30

5 // 17/1

00

01

76

5 // 17/2

00

11

23

5 // 16

00

08

79

5 // 15

00

03

55

4 // 20

00

00

28

4 // 11

00

12

93

4 // 12

00

12

08

4 // 13

00

03

01

4 // 9/1

00

00

26

4 // 8

00

09

82

4 // 7

00

06

65

38 Rasta

00

02

46

2

S.B.S. Nagar

Nawanshahr

Julah Majra

286

54 // 8

00

00

20

79/1 Rasta

00

00

32

54 // 7

00

07

76

54 // 4

00

00

81

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

101

54 // 6

00

01

69

54 // 5/2

00

12

50

53 //1

00

00

83

3

S.B.S. Nagar

Nawanshahr

Khoja

284

22 // 6

00

00

20

21 // 1

00

11

55

21 // 2

00

01

60

9 // 21

00

01

13

9 // 22

00

11

27

9 // 23

00

12

69

9 // 24

00

07

50

9 // 17

00

05

80

9 // 16

00

13

26

10 // 20

00

11

79

10 // 11

00

00

61

10 // 12

00

10

33

10 // 19

00

02

30

10 // 13

00

13

01

10 // 14

00

07

84

10 // 15

00

00

20

10 // 7

00

05

05

10 // 6

00

12

59

11 // 10

00

12

44

11 // 9

00

03

23

11 // 1

00

00

26

11 // 2

00

09

88

11 // 3

00

12

46

11 // 4

00

09

31

11 // 5

00

00

20

7 // 24

00

03

91

7 // 25

00

13

31

6 // 21

00

11

13

6 // 22

00

00

79

6 // 20

00

01

70

6 // 19

00

11

60

6 // 18

00

12

86

102

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

6 // 17

00

06

48

6 // 14

00

06

35

6 // 15

00

12

99

5 // 11/1

00

08

72

5 // 11/2

00

00

64

5 // 11/3

00

02

53

98 Rasta

00

00

82

5 // 28

00

01

64

5 // 12/1

00

02

08

5 // 12/2

00

00

98

5 // 9/2

00

08

58

62

00

01

55

5 // 8

00

09

64

5 // 7

00

12

28

5 // 6

00

11

14

4 // 10/2/1

00

05

80

4 // 10/2/2

00

03

89

4 // 10/1

00

02

71

4 // 9

00

06

63

4

S.B.S. Nagar

Nawanshahr

Tajpur

283

27 // 2

00

00

20

27 // 9

00

02

43

27 // 3

00

02

73

27 // 4

00

07

68

27 // 5

00

11

55

27 // 8

00

09

51

27 // 7

00

04

82

27 // 6

00

00

78

26 // 1

00

12

76

26 // 2/1

00

06

07

46 Rasta

00

00

20

45 Rasta

00

02

47

26 // 2/3

00

03

96

26 // 3

00

07

55

5

S.B.S. Nagar

Nawanshahr

Lalewal

282

6 // 3

00

04

53

6 // 4

00

12

31

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

103

6 // 5

00

07

27

1 // 25

00

06

01

2 // 21

00

08

86

6

S.B.S. Nagar

Nawanshahr

Garhi Bharti

218

55 // 6

00

09

62

85 Rasta

00

01

21

56 // 10

00

13

76

7

S.B.S. Nagar

Nawanshahr

Bharta Kalan

219

53 // 9

00

09

98

53 // 8

00

12

19

53 // 7

00

12

09

53 // 4

00

00

20

53 // 5

00

02

02

53 // 6

00

10

30

52 // 1

00

06

84

52 // 10

00

05

29

52 // 2

00

11

40

52 // 9

00

00

53

52 // 3

00

12

14

52 // 4/2

00

12

23

52 // 5/1

00

05

73

52 // 5/2

00

03

41

52 // 5/3

00

03

16

51 // 1/1

00

01

41

51 // 1/2

00

09

00

51 // 2/1

00

09

81

51 // 2/2

00

02

32

51 // 3/1

00

11

95

51 // 4

00

08

00

51 // 5

00

01

12

46 // 23

00

00

39

46 // 24

00

06

06

46 // 25

00

11

51

47 // 21

00

11

40

Rasta

00

01

06

47 // 22

00

12

37

47 // 23

00

11

73

104

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

47 // 18

00

00

20

47 // 17

00

03

90

47 // 24

00

08

52

47 // 25

00

02

12

47 // 16

00

10

27

48 // 20

00

11

91

48 // 19/2

00

11

82

48 // 18

00

11

39

8

S.B.S. Nagar

Nawanshahr

Dariyapur

278

15 // 18

00

00

68

15 // 17

00

11

27

15 // 14

00

01

17

15 // 15

00

07

20

15 // 16

00

05

60

14 // 20/2

00

00

51

14 // 11/1

00

03

50

33 Rasta

00

01

48

14 // 11/2

00

06

93

14 // 20/1/1

00

00

20

14 // 12

00

12

59

14 // 26

00

00

95

14 // 13/1

00

01

10

14 // 13/2

00

10

71

14 // 14

00

12

14

14 // 15

00

12

05

13 // 11/1

00

03

85

13 // 10/2

00

00

20

43 Rasta

00

07

12

13 // 10/1

00

00

20

13 // 11/2

00

05

86

13 // 12

00

05

59

13 // 13/1

00

00

68

13 // 9/1

00

03

78

13 // 8/1

00

09

50

13 // 7/1

00

12

47

13 // 6/1

00

12

46

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

105

12 // 26

00

03

35

12 // 10/1

00

08

90

12 // 9/1

00

12

88

12 // 8/1

00

10

63

12 // 3

00

01

60

12 // 4

00

07

66

12 // 5

00

04

26

12 // 6

00

00

22

12 // 7/1

00

04

99

9

S.B.S. Nagar

Nawanshahr

Kahlon

222

69 // 5

00

07

45

69 // 6

00

00

27

70 // 1/1

00

07

60

70 // 1/2

00

04

42

70 // 2

00

11

94

70 // 3

00

10

70

132 Rasta

00

01

37

70 // 4

00

11

85

70 // 5

00

11

90

67 // 25

00

00

21

71 // 1

00

07

87

71 // 2

00

01

98

66 // 21

00

03

99

66 // 22

00

10

54

66 // 23/1

00

06

38

66 // 23/2

00

06

09

66 // 24

00

11

83

66 // 25

00

11

73

65 // 20

00

00

20

65 // 21

00

10

10

65 // 19

00

02

90

65 // 22

00

08

67

65 // 18

00

08

78

65 // 23

00

03

01

65 //24

00

00

20

65 // 17

00

12

14

106

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

65 // 16

00

11

50

124 Rasta

00

01

51

64 // 20

00

10

74

64 // 19

00

12

13

64 // 18

00

11

75

64 // 13

00

00

20

64 // 14

00

03

28

64 // 17

00

08

77

64 // 15

00

02

07

64 // 16

00

01

27

10

S.B.S. Nagar

Nawanshahr

Garhi Fateh Khan.

273

5 // 15

00

06

19

5 // 6

00

01

79

4 // 11/1

00

00

87

4 //10/2

00

12

26

4 // 9

00

12

76

4 // 2/3

00

00

20

4 // 8/2

00

04

16

4 // 8/3

00

00

20

4 // 3/1

00

06

76

4 // 3/2

00

01

13

4 // 4

00

08

19

11

S.B.S. Nagar

Nawanshahr

Pallian khurd

225

37 // 24

00

03

41

37 // 17

00

00

69

37 // 16

00

00

82

12

S.B.S. Nagar

Nawanshahr

Pallian Kalan

226

39 // 16/2

00

09

33

39 // 16/1

00

00

91

39 // 15

00

00

81

38 // 20

00

00

81

38 // 11

00

14

28

38 // 10/2

00

00

55

53/3 Rasta

00

01

81

38 // 12

00

00

22

38 // 9

00

13

21

38 // 2

00

00

50

38 // 8

00

01

23

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

107

38 // 3

00

14

62

38 // 4

00

01

10

35 // 23

00

00

62

35 // 24

00

14

60

35 // 25

00

00

65

35 // 17

00

00

99

35 // 16

00

13

27

35 // 15/3

00

01

88

36 // 20

00

00

20

36 // 11/2

00

11

06

36 // 10/1/2

00

00

72

36 // 9/2

00

00

97

36 // 9/1

00

06

81

36 // 26

00

00

37

13

S.B.S. Nagar

Nawanshahr

Ramraipur

155

613

00

05

31

674

00

06

10

673

00

08

77

676

00

05

75

677

00

04

20

678

00

04

19

679

00

00

20

683

00

05

27

682

00

03

46

681

00

01

00

695

00

04

75

692

00

04

26

694

00

02

45

693

00

06

64

Rasta

00

01

14

774

00

03

59

773

00

10

56

772

00

09

05

Rasta

00

00

68

756

00

09

31

758

00

00

20

108

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

755

00

06

42

759

00

03

18

754

00

02

22

753

00

07

10

740

00

00

20

743

00

09

48

742

00

08

40

Rasta

00

00

98

425

00

09

80

421

00

09

61

422

00

00

20

403

00

09

45

367

00

08

03

366

00

02

50

365

00

00

20

14

S.B.S. Nagar

Nawanshahr

Sajawalpur

154

591

00

00

97

579

00

07

58

578

00

08

85

573

00

03

51

574

00

04

92

572

00

13

03

558

00

07

56

557

00

03

63

778/556

00

02

93

777/556

00

00

86

535/1

00

01

94

535

00

09

80

534

00

08

64

533

00

03

91

530

00

01

00

529

00

00

20

525

00

00

20

526

00

00

20

524

00

00

20

15

S.B.S. Nagar

Nawanshahr

Sahbajpur

227

2498 Rasta

00

01

58

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

109

2463

00

06

47

2464

00

13

10

2465

00

02

84

2467

00

00

20

2466

00

10

31

2473 Rasta

00

01

76

2475

00

11

67

2474

00

04

71

2670/2479

00

01

44

2669/2479

00

01

44

2482

00

06

94

2480

00

06

89

2488

00

00

20

2487

00

04

53

Rasta

00

00

24

2486

00

00

20

2333

00

00

85

2324

00

11

79

2325

00

06

03

2323 Rasta

00

01

08

2319

00

06

40

2320

00

12

25

2314

00

01

50

2321

00

00

36

2313

00

13

91

2312

00

08

99

2309 Rasta

00

04

83

2298

00

01

24

2297

00

07

97

2296

00

06

30

2295

00

08

16

2294

00

08

35

2289

00

06

48

2290

00

07

49

1856/508

00

01

32

110

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2245

00

09

40

2165

00

11

82

2164

00

10

45

2163

00

13

86

2162

00

05

67

2140

00

09

01

2145

00

00

25

2144

00

08

07

2143

00

04

70

2142

00

00

33

2098

00

00

79

2105 Rasta

00

01

31

2125

00

10

28

2120

00

00

20

2124

00

02

25

2121

00

12

52

2118

00

02

14

2122

00

00

20

2117

00

14

84

16

Hoshiarpur

Garhshankar

Dhamai

163

2375/1978

00

13

66

2374/1978

00

01

79

1977

00

04

43

1976

00

00

61

1973

00

00

20

1975

00

03

87

1935

00

27

76

1936

00

01

54

1937/2368

00

04

42

1938

00

04

25

1947

00

01

59

2368/1943

00

07

34

1939

00

00

20

1940

00

03

75

17

Hoshiarpur

Garhshankar

Ramgarh

162

371

00

06

85

370

00

00

41

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

111

689/373

00

00

80

690/373

00

04

23

682/368

00

01

40

683/368

00

06

50

375

00

06

11

376

00

01

11

366

00

06

79

365

00

07

49

364

00

00

75

363

00

05

67

379

00

06

80

Rasta

00

01

17

401

00

04

37

400

00

11

44

399

00

02

19

389

00

11

91

388

00

00

20

Rasta

00

01

55

391

00

00

20

510

00

00

57

508

00

00

69

509

00

12

23

571/515

00

03

77

516

00

08

07

575/517

00

01

88

522

00

02

05

518

00

10

74

519

00

01

24

520

00

02

88

506

00

00

48

18

Hoshiarpur

Garhshankar

Maujupur

250

237

00

08

46

236

00

10

69

235

00

11

58

150

00

03

15

487/151

00

08

70

112

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

488/151

00

01

09

489/152

00

00

41

490/152

00

05

41

153

00

02

00

441/439

00

00

20

442/439

00

00

20

19

Hoshiarpur

Garhshankar

Kunail

364

426

00

09

04

380

00

13

09

425

00

02

52

423

00

09

20

417

00

00

20

418

00

03

87

419

00

03

24

422/2

00

06

78

420

00

01

71

422/1

00

16

11

399

00

03

13

398

00

02

44

397

00

00

78

396

00

05

33

395

00

01

59

400

00

03

58

401/2

00

05

64

394

00

00

25

393/2

00

00

20

401/1

00

06

07

339/2

00

05

56

339/1

00

16

49

335

00

00

28

336

00

07

76

20

Hoshiarpur

Garhshankar

Barapur

361

86 Rasta

00

01

42

36 // 11

00

03

78

37 // 15/2

00

03

43

37 // 15/1

00

01

32

37 // 6

00

12

93

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

113

37 // 7/1

00

00

20

37 // 5/2

00

00

22

37 // 5/1

00

01

99

37 // 4

00

10

77

30 // 24/2

00

05

72

30 // 23/3

00

00

20

318 Rasta

00

01

71

30 // 24/1

00

01

83

30 // 23/2

00

04

11

30 // 18/2

00

03

52

30 // 18/1

00

06

81

315 Rasta

00

01

80

30 // 13/2

00

00

20

30 // 13/1

00

03

07

30 // 12/3

00

06

78

30 // 12/2

00

04

56

30 // 9/2

00

00

20

30 // 9/3

00

03

83

30 // 9/5

00

00

28

30 // 9/1

00

02

89

Rasta

00

02

22

30 // 9/4

00

01

87

30 // 2/3

00

00

58

Rasta

00

00

20

30 // 2/2

00

00

20

30 // 2/1

00

09

90

30 // 1

00

00

21

19 // 22/3

00

02

73

19 // 21/2

00

02

39

19 // 22/1

00

00

38

19 // 21/1

00

06

18

19 // 20

00

11

90

19 // 11

00

10

95

19 // 10

00

02

23

Rasta

00

00

20

114

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

20 // 15

00

00

20

342 Rasta

00

02

74

20 // 6

00

07

24

20 // 5/2

00

06

01

20 // 5/1

00

05

55

12 // 25/2

00

06

10

12 // 25/1

00

05

65

12 // 28

00

00

65

12 // 24

00

00

20

12 // 16/2

00

00

26

12 // 16/3

00

02

95

12 // 17

00

07

38

12 // 14/2

00

10

22

89 Rasta

00

01

77

12 // 7

00

11

44

283 Rasta

00

00

20

12 // 4/3

00

02

19

12 // 4/2

00

10

89

12 // 5

00

00

20

6 // 24

00

02

95

6 // 25/1

00

09

24

6 // 16/2

00

01

97

6 // 16/1

00

10

16

6 // 15

00

06

24

5 // 11

00

04

44

6 // 6

00

00

20

5 // 10

00

06

80

21

Hoshiarpur

Garhshankar

Gaddiwal

483

5 // 4

00

04

52

1 // 24/4

00

03

38

1 // 24/3

00

06

39

1 // 25/1

00

01

44

1 // 17/1

00

00

93

1 // 16/2

00

05

61

110 Rasta

00

00

90

1 // 16/1/2

00

01

89

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

115

1 // 16/1/1

00

02

27

1 // 15/3

00

02

73

1 // 15/2

00

09

05

2 // 11

00

00

24

[F. No. R-11025(11)/1/2018-OR-I/E-21789]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

नई द ली, 11 जनवरी, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 51

51

51

51.— के56ीय सरकार को लोकिहत मH यह आवfयक तीत होता है क पारादीप (ओिड़शा) से हैदराबाद (तेलंगाना)

तक पेWोिलयम उVपाद% के प!रवहन के िलए इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपOरेशन िलिमटेड के ,ारा "पारादीप -हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन" िबछाई जानी

चािहए;

और के56ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन िबछाने के योजन के िलए यह आवfयक तीत होता है क ऐसी भूिम मH जो इससे

उपाबT अनुसूची मH वNणत है और िजसमH उ0 पाइपलाइन िबछाऐ जाने का ताव है, उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन कया जाए;

अत: अब, के56ीय सरकार, पेWोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइ5स (भूिम मH उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन) अिधिनयम,1962

(1962 का 50) क धारा 3 क उपधारा (1) ,ारा द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए, उस भूिम मH उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन करने

के अपने आशय क घोषणा करती है;

कोई Žि0, जो उ0 अनुसूची मH वNणत भूिम मH िहतबT है, उस तारीख से िजसको इस अिधसूचना से यु0 भारत के राजपK

क ितयाँ साधारण जनता को उपलrध करा दी जाती ह , इ\ कस दन के भीतर भूिम के नीचे पाइपलाइन िबछाए जाने के िलए उस मH

उपयोग के अिधकार के अजन के स ब5ध मH 8ी दलीप कुमार महांित, सƒम ािधकारी, इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपOरेशन िलिमटेड, पारादीप -

हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन प!रयोजना, तृतीय तल, आलोक भारती टावर, शहीद नगर, भुवनेf वर -751007, ओिड़शा को िलिखत gप मH

आƒेप भेज सकेगा I

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

तहसील - एरसमा

िजला - जगतFसंहपुर

राhय - ओिड़शा

गाँव का नाम

nलॉट नं.

ƒेKफल

हे\टेयर

एयर

वग मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

पािणगिड़आक5धा

326

00

01

00

327

00

00

45

290

00

10

72

291

00

01

92

292/793

00

02

52

293

00

02

56

295

00

03

70

296

00

01

85

116

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/236/2017-ओआर-I/ई-13717]

पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव

297

00

01

50

298

00

02

88

299

00

02

34

257

00

02

52

278

00

00

16

276

00

02

52

274

00

02

95

273

00

00

55

272

00

04

00

269/777

00

03

28

260

00

01

45

266

00

00

74

239/978

00

04

68

239

00

03

39

238

00

01

48

238/945

00

04

52

239/977

00

02

00

234

00

13

30

235/747

00

01

20

235

00

03

90

210

00

29

00

267

00

00

28

233/779

00

00

22

238/946

00

00

56

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

117

New Delhi, the 11th January, 2018

S.O. 51.— Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the

transportation of petroleum products from Paradip (Odisha) to Hyderabad (Telangana),“Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline”

should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary

to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the

schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and

Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby

declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty-one days from the date on

which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the general public, object in

writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Sri Dillip Kumar

Mohanty, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline Project, 3rd Floor, Alok

Bharati Tower, Saheed Nagar, Bhubaneswar- 751007, (Odisha).

SCHEDULE

Tehsil : ERASAMA

District : JAGATSINGHPUR

State : ODISHA

Name of the Village

Plot No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

PANIGARIAKANDHA

326

00

01

00

327

00

00

45

290

00

10

72

291

00

01

92

292/793

00

02

52

293

00

02

56

295

00

03

70

296

00

01

85

297

00

01

50

298

00

02

88

299

00

02

34

257

00

02

52

278

00

00

16

276

00

02

52

274

00

02

95

273

00

00

55

272

00

04

00

269/777

00

03

28

260

00

01

45

266

00

00

74

239/978

00

04

68

239

00

03

39

118

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

238

00

01

48

238/945

00

04

52

239/977

00

02

00

234

00

13

30

235/747

00

01

20

235

00

03

90

210

00

29

00

267

00

00

28

233/779

00

00

22

238/946

00

00

56

[F. No. R-11025(11)/236/2017-OR-I/E-13717]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

नई द ली, 11 जनवरी, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 52

52

52

52.—के56ीय सरकार ने पेWोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूिम मH उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन) अिधिनयम,

1962 (1962 का 50) (िजसे इसमH इसके प‡ात उ0 अिधिनयम कहा गया है) क धारा 3 उप धारा (1) के अधीन जारी क गई, भारत

सरकार के पेWोिलयम और ाकृितक गैस मंKालय क अिधसूचना का.आ. 1068(अ) तारीख 03.04.2017 िजसका काशन भारत के

राजपK संsया 947, भाग II, खGड 3, उप खGड (II) तारीख 06.04.2017 मH कया गया है। इस अिधसूचना मH संल न अनुसूची मH

िविनzदp आंLदेश राhय के मंडल : ,ारका ितŒमला िजला: वेट गोदावरी क भूिम मH, ओडीशा राhय मH पारादीप से तेलंगाना राhय मH

हैदराबाद तक पेWोिलयम उVपाद% के प!रवहन के िलए इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपOरेशन िलिमटेड के ,ारा $याि5वत कए जा रहे “पारादीप-

हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन प!रयोजना” के संबंध मH पाइपलाइन िबछाने के योजन के िलए उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन करने के िलए अपने

आशय क घोषणा क थी:

और उ0 राजपK अिधसूचना क ितयाँ जनता को उपलrध करा दी ग थk। और उ0 अिधिनयम क धारा 6 क उपधारा (1)

के अनुसरण मH सƒम ािधकारी ने के56ीय सरकार को अपनी !रपोट दे दी है।

और के56ीय सरकार ने उ0 !रपोट पर िवचार करने के पf चात् और यह समाधान हो जाने पर क उ0 भूिम पाइपलाइन

िबछाने के िलए अपेिƒत है, उसमH उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन करने का िविनf चय कया है:

अतः अब, के56ीय सरकार उ0 अिधिनयम क धारा 6 क उपधारा (1) ,ारा द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए एतद् ,ारा

घोषणा करती है क इस अिधसूचना से संल न अनुसूची मH िविनzदp भूिम मH पाइपलाइन िबछाने के उपयोग का अिधकार अNजत कया

जाए:

और के56ीय सरकार उ0 अिधिनयम क धारा 6 क उपधारा (4) ,ारा द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए, यह िनदश देती है

क उ0 भूिम मH उपयोग का अिधकार इस घोषणा के काशन क तारीख से के56ीय सरकार मH िनिहत होने के बजाए सभी िबलंगम% से

मु0 होकर इंिडयन ऑयल कापOरेशन िलिमटेड मH िनिहत होगा।

अनुसूची

िजला: वेट गोदावरी राhय: आ5L देश

मंडल का नाम

ाम का नाम

सव न बर

ƒेKफल

हे\टेयर

एयर

वग मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

,ारका ितŒमला

जग‘ाधपुरम

4/3

00

00

03

4/2A

00

14

81

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

119

4/2B

00

07

71

4/2C

00

08

51

4/1

00

00

16

10/1

00

55

51

10/2

00

10

01

3/6

00

03

98

11/2

00

12

96

11/1

00

16

71

15/1

00

00

23

,ारका ितŒमला

जी. को-ापली

20/1

00

16

25

11

00

23

56

10/4

00

05

93

10/2J

00

05

47

10/2E

00

05

56

10/2D

00

05

17

10/1B/4

00

03

06

10/1B/3-2

00

09

60

8/1C

00

21

19

8/1E

00

03

64

1/6

00

10

59

1/3

00

10

15

1/5

00

08

64

1/4

00

10

05

2/2

00

00

42

2/1

00

00

05

3/1

00

18

97

,ारका ितŒमला

कोडीगुडेम

280/1

00

11

55

279

00

43

39

281

00

23

13

282/2

00

12

67

282/1

00

00

25

120

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

289/1

00

30

01

288/5

00

09

78

288/3

00

01

53

288/4

00

16

82

292/2

00

10

29

292/1

00

15

39

79/2

00

20

63

78/1

00

33

04

73

00

46

74

77

00

02

41

76

00

34

72

66

00

02

13

65

00

39

72

63

00

19

91

64

00

01

63

,ारका ितŒमला

चेिलकिनवारी पोतेपली

83/3

00

37

89

82

00

46

60

81/2

00

11

92

81/1

00

02

91

80/5

00

14

69

80/3

00

09

56

80/2

00

04

41

80/1

00

15

00

97/3

00

15

90

97/2

00

10

41

97/1

00

05

63

98/4

00

00

32

100/9

00

01

47

100/8

00

09

98

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

121

100/7

00

07

06

100/11

00

10

08

99/7

00

10

60

99/6

00

09

62

99/5

00

03

85

100/6

00

17

63

100/3

00

07

15

100/1

00

01

42

100/2

00

08

60

101/1C

00

16

13

45/4

00

36

21

45/2

00

22

42

44/5

00

02

73

44/4

00

10

88

44/6

00

05

53

44/2

00

05

40

44/1

00

06

30

37/2F

00

11

98

38/2

00

41

25

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/252/2017-ओआर-I/ई-21033]

पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 11th January, 2018

S.O. 52 .— Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural

Gas, published in the Gazette of India No. 947 Part-II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii) dated 06.04.2017 vide S.O. Number

1068 (E) dated 03.04.2017 issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals pipelines

(Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) the Central

Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land situated in Mandal Dwaraka Tirumala, District

West Godavari in Andhra Pradesh State, specified in the schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of

laying pipeline for the transportation of petroleum products from Paradip in the State of Odisha to Hyderabad in the

State of Telangana by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the "Paradip–Hyderabad Pipeline Project".

And whereas the copies of the Gazette were made available to the public. And whereas the Competent

Authority has under Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, has submitted his report of Central Government.

And whereas, the Central Government after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land

is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of the user therein;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is

hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

122

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby directs that the right of user of the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the

Central Government, vests on the date of publication of the declaration, in India Oil Corporation Limited, free from all

encumbrances.

SCHEDULE

District : West Godavari

State : Andhra Pradesh

Name of Mandal

Name of Village

Survey No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Square

Metre

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

Dwaraka Tirumala

Jagannadhapuram

4/3

00

00

03

4/2A

00

14

81

4/2B

00

07

71

4/2C

00

08

51

4/1

00

00

16

10/1

00

55

51

10/2

00

10

01

3/6

00

03

98

11/2

00

12

96

11/1

00

16

71

15/1

00

00

23

Dwaraka Tirumala

G Kottapalli

20/1

00

16

25

11

00

23

56

10/4

00

05

93

10/2J

00

05

47

10/2E

00

05

56

10/2D

00

05

17

10/1B/4

00

03

06

10/1B/3-2

00

09

60

8/1C

00

21

19

8/1E

00

03

64

1/6

00

10

59

1/3

00

10

15

1/5

00

08

64

1/4

00

10

05

2/2

00

00

42

2/1

00

00

05

3/1

00

18

97

Dwaraka Tirumala

Kodigudem

280/1

00

11

55

279

00

43

39

281

00

23

13

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

123

282/2

00

12

67

282/1

00

00

25

289/1

00

30

01

288/5

00

09

78

288/3

00

01

53

288/4

00

16

82

292/2

00

10

29

292/1

00

15

39

79/2

00

20

63

78/1

00

33

04

73

00

46

74

77

00

02

41

76

00

34

72

66

00

02

13

65

00

39

72

63

00

19

91

64

00

01

63

Dwaraka Tirumala

Chelikanivari Potepalli

83/3

00

37

89

82

00

46

60

81/2

00

11

92

81/1

00

02

91

80/5

00

14

69

80/3

00

09

56

80/2

00

04

41

80/1

00

15

00

97/3

00

15

90

97/2

00

10

41

97/1

00

05

63

98/4

00

00

32

100/9

00

01

47

100/8

00

09

98

100/7

00

07

06

100/11

00

10

08

99/7

00

10

60

99/6

00

09

62

99/5

00

03

85

100/6

00

17

63

100/3

00

07

15

100/1

00

01

42

100/2

00

08

60

101/1C

00

16

13

124

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

45/4

00

36

21

45/2

00

22

42

44/5

00

02

73

44/4

00

10

88

44/6

00

05

53

44/2

00

05

40

44/1

00

06

30

37/2F

00

11

98

38/2

00

41

25

[F. No. R-11025(11)/252/2017-OR-I/E-21033]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

नई द ली, 11 जनवरी, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 53

53

53

53.— के56ीय सरकार ने पेWोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूिम मH उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन) अिधिनयम,

1962 (1962 का 50) (िजसे इसमH इसके पf चात् उ0 अिधिनयम कहा गया है) क धारा 3 उप धारा (1) के अधीन जारी क गई, भारत

सरकार के पेWोिलयम और ाकृितक गैस मंKालय क अिधसूचना का.आ. 1074(अ) तारीख 03.04.2017 िजसका काशन भारत के

राजपK संsया 948, भाग II, खGड 3, उप खGड (II) तारीख 06.04.2017 मH कया गया है। इस अिधसूचना मH संल न अनुसूची मH

िविनzदp आंLदेश राhय के मंडल : गोपालपुरम िजला: वेट गोदावरी क भूिम मH, ओडीशा राhय मH पारादीप से तेलंगाना राhय मH

हैदराबाद तक पेWोिलयम उVपाद% के प!रवहन के िलए इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपOरेशन िलिमटेड के ,ारा $याि5वत कए जा रहे “पारादीप-

हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन प!रयोजना” के संबंध मH पाइपलाइन िबछाने के योजन के िलए उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन करने के िलए अपने

आशय क घोषणा क थी:

और उ0 राजपK अिधसूचना क ितयाँ जनता को उपलrध करा दी ग थk। और उ0 अिधिनयम क धारा 6 क उपधारा (1)

के अनुसरण मH सƒम ािधकारी ने के56ीय सरकार को अपनी !रपोट दे दी है।

और के56ीय सरकार ने उ0 !रपोट पर िवचार करने के पf चात् और यह समाधान हो जाने पर क उ0 भूिम पाइपलाइन

िबछाने के िलए अपेिƒत है, उसमH उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन करने का िविनf चय कया है:

अतः अब, के56ीय सरकार उ0 अिधिनयम क धारा 6 क उपधारा (1) ,ारा द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए एतद् ,ारा

घोषणा करती है क इस अिधसूचना से संल न अनुसूची मH िविनzदp भूिम मH पाइपलाइन िबछाने के उपयोग का अिधकार अNजत कया

जाए:

और के56ीय सरकार उ0 अिधिनयम क धारा 6 क उपधारा (4) ,ारा द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए, यह िनदश देती है

क उ0 भूिम मH उपयोग का अिधकार इस घोषणा के काशन क तारीख से के56ीय सरकार मH िनिहत होने के बजाए सभी िबलंगम% से

मु0 होकर इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपOरेशन िलिमटेड मH िनिहत होगा।

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

िजला: वेट गोदावरी राhय: आ5Lदेश

मंडल का नाम

ाम का नाम

सव न बर

ƒेK फल

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

125

हे\टेयर

एयर

वग मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

गोपालपुरम

िभमोलु

530/1

00

10

27

529/2

00

05

15

533/1

00

09

01

529/1

00

23

22

536/1

00

22

47

520/2

00

13

96

522

00

19

14

521

01

13

60

गोपालपुरम

वेलाFचंतलागुडेम

325

00

63

85

601 & 602

02

62

97

578

00

24

69

584

00

38

46

585/3

00

16

83

585/1

00

03

80

583/1

00

03

45

590/2C

00

06

30

590/1C

00

11

33

557

00

14

74

556/2

00

23

83

550/1

00

24

52

537

00

30

01

538

00

28

10

539

00

31

09

गोपालपुरम

गोपालपुरम

156/1

00

31

98

155

00

62

15

147

00

49

91

127/2

00

17

62

125

00

38

65

124

00

21

86

223/1A

00

19

49

224

00

48

85

232

00

18

34

126

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

231

00

21

00

226/3

00

22

98

243

00

07

09

242/2C

00

19

29

242/2B

00

00

31

242/2A

00

15

30

242/1A

00

31

89

250/3C

00

25

43

250/3A

00

31

70

249

00

38

79

253/1A

00

02

21

253/3A1

00

10

07

254/8

00

18

35

256/1A

00

02

43

256/2A

00

00

60

गोपालपुरम

कोम!टकुंटा

58

00

31

20

67/2

00

33

01

67/3

00

09

72

48/3A

00

13

97

48/3B

00

01

02

48/2

00

05

62

48/1

00

10

25

1

00

49

83

45

00

36

16

36

00

56

84

35

00

21

72

24

00

19

49

32

00

45

51

109

00

04

77

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

127

111

00

58

44

112/2

00

35

84

121

00

18

13

113

00

05

44

गोपालपुरम

वडलागु5टा

35

00

31

11

34

00

20

05

33

00

30

99

7

00

16

70

8

00

29

57

14

00

06

47

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/252/2017-ओआर-I/ई-21033]

पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 11th January, 2018

S.O. 53.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural

Gas, published in the Gazette of India No. 948 Part-II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii) dated 06.04.2017 vide S.O. Number

1074 (E) dated 03.04.2017 issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals pipelines

(Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) the Central

Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land situated in Mandal Gopalapuram, District

West Godavari in Andhra Pradesh State, specified in the schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of

laying pipeline for the transportation of petroleum products from Paradip in the State of Odisha to Hyderabad in the

State of Telangana by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the "Paradip–Hyderabad Pipeline Project".

And whereas the copies of the Gazette were made available to the public. And whereas the Competent

Authority has under Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, has submitted his report of Central Government.

And whereas, the Central Government after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land

is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of the user therein;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is

hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby directs that the right of user of the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the

Central Government, vests on the date of publication of the declaration, in Indian Oil Corporation Limited, free from

all encumbrances.

SCHEDULE

District : West Godavari

State : Andhra Pradesh

Name of Mandal

Name of Village

Survey No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Square Metre

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

128

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Gopalapuram

Bhimolu

530/1

00

10

27

529/2

00

05

15

533/1

00

09

01

529/1

00

23

22

536/1

00

22

47

520/2

00

13

96

522

00

19

14

521

01

13

60

Gopalapuram

Vellachintalagudem

325

00

63

85

601 & 602

02

62

97

578

00

24

69

584

00

38

46

585/3

00

16

83

585/1

00

03

80

583/1

00

03

45

590/2C

00

06

30

590/1C

00

11

33

557

00

14

74

556/2

00

23

83

550/1

00

24

52

537

00

30

01

538

00

28

10

539

00

31

09

Gopalapuram

Gopalapuram

156/1

00

31

98

155

00

62

15

147

00

49

91

127/2

00

17

62

125

00

38

65

124

00

21

86

223/1A

00

19

49

224

00

48

85

232

00

18

34

231

00

21

00

226/3

00

22

98

243

00

07

09

242/2C

00

19

29

242/2B

00

00

31

242/2A

00

15

30

242/1A

00

31

89

250/3C

00

25

43

250/3A

00

31

70

249

00

38

79

253/1A

00

02

21

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

129

253/3A1

00

10

07

254/8

00

18

35

256/1A

00

02

43

256/2A

00

00

60

Gopalapuram

Komatikunta

58

00

31

20

67/2

00

33

01

67/3

00

09

72

48/3A

00

13

97

48/3B

00

01

02

48/2

00

05

62

48/1

00

10

25

1

00

49

83

45

00

36

16

36

00

56

84

35

00

21

72

24

00

19

49

32

00

45

51

109

00

04

77

111

00

58

44

112/2

00

35

84

121

00

18

13

113

00

05

44

Gopalapuram

Vadlagunta

35

00

31

11

34

00

20

05

33

00

30

99

7

00

16

70

8

00

29

57

14

00

06

47

[F. No. R-11025(11)/252/2017-OR-I/E-21033]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

नई द ली, 11 जनवरी, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 54

54

54

54.— के56ीय सरकार ने पेWोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूिम मH उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन) अिधिनयम,

1962 (1962 का 50) (िजसे इसमH इसके प‡ात उ0 अिधिनयम कहा गया है) क धारा 3 उप धारा (1) के अधीन जारी क गई, भारत

सरकार के पेWोिलयम और ाकृितक गैस मंKालय क अिधसूचना का.आ. 1073(अ) तारीख 03.04.2017 िजसका काशन भारत के

राजपK संsया 948, भाग II, खGड 3, उप खGड (II) तारीख 06.04.2017 मH कया गया है। इस अिधसूचना मH संलˆ अनुसूची मH

िविनzदp आंLदेश राhय के मंडल : तालपुडी िजला: वेट गोदावरी क भूिम मH, ओडीशा राhय मH पारादीप से तेलंगाना राhय मH

130

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

हैदराबाद तक पेWोिलयम उVपाद% के प!रवहन के िलए इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपरेशन िलिमटेड के ,ारा $याि5वत कए जा रहे “पारादीप-

हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन प!रयोजना” के संबंध मH पाइपलाइन िबछाने के योजन के िलए उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन करने के िलए अपने

आशय क घोषणा क थी:

और उ0 राजपK अिधसूचना क ितयाँ जनता को उपलrध करा दी गई थk। और उ0 अिधिनयम क धारा 6 क उपधारा (1)

के अनुसरण मH सƒम ािधकारी नH के56ीय सरकार को अपनी !रपोट दे दी है।

और के56ीय सरकार ने उ0 !रपोट पर िवचार करने के प‡ात और यह समाधान हो जाने पर क उ0 भूिम पाइपलाइन

िबछाने के िलए अपेिƒत है, उसमH उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन करने का िविनqचय कया है:

अतः अब, के56ीय सरकार उ0 अिधिनयम क धारा 6 क उपधारा (1) ,ारा द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए ,rn~}kj

घोषणा करती है क इस अिधसूचना से संलˆ अनुसूिच मH िविनzदp भूिम मH पाइपलाइन िबछाने के उपयोग का अिधकार अNजत कया

जाए:

और के56ीय सरकार उ0 अिधिनयम क धारा 6 क उपधारा (4) ,ारा द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए, यह िनदश देती है

क उ0 भूिम मH उपयोग का अिधकार इस घोषणा के काशन क तारीख से के56ीय सरकार मH िनिहत होने के बजाए सभी िबलंगम% से

मु0 होकर इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपरेशन िलिमटेड मH िनिहत होगा।

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

िजला: वेट गोदावरी राhय: आ5Lदेश

मंडल का नाम

ाम का नाम

सव न बर

ƒेK फल

हे\टेयर

एयर

वग मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

तालपुडी

ब’यावरम

111/7

00

06

11

111/6

00

00

59

111/9

00

05

81

79/3

00

01

18

79/4

00

09

80

78/1

00

00

14

76/1

00

13

69

76/2

00

15

00

78/2

00

00

74

76/3

00

28

25

तालपुडी

रागोलापली

261/1A

00

08

97

260/5

00

17

95

260/4

00

12

07

254/2

00

31

35

254/1

00

16

46

251/2

00

02

38

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

131

251/1

00

11

18

250/4

00

00

08

252/6

00

10

29

250/2

00

09

22

250/1

00

13

88

249/4

00

17

86

तालपुडी

तुपाकुलागुडेम

247

00

00

90

241

00

26

64

240

00

12

39

232/3

00

04

90

232/4

00

19

00

234

00

10

62

225/1

00

01

42

225/3

00

16

20

225/4

00

13

11

142/2

00

18

33

142/1

00

00

66

142/3

00

15

64

142/4

00

19

59

145

00

44

18

161/1

00

05

11

161/2

00

10

71

162/1

00

05

71

162/4

00

01

28

180

00

03

57

तालपुडी

अ‘ादेवरपेटा

216/1

00

17

84

217

00

29

77

214

00

27

12

213

00

00

03

132

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

221/1

00

19

63

221/4

00

00

03

221/3

00

09

06

221/2

00

08

70

228/3

00

12

87

229

00

19

09

281/1

00

12

56

281/2

00

12

71

279/1

00

00

0.19

289

00

17

65

290/2

00

17

42

258/1

00

10

60

273/2

00

09

01

273/1

00

08

17

272/3

00

07

20

272/2

00

03

40

260/1

00

04

04

263/4B

00

02

97

263/3

00

08

48

263/2

00

07

52

263/1

00

08

14

270

00

16

34

358

00

27

65

347

00

00

24

349

00

37

66

348

00

02

02

351/2

00

30

09

352/3A

00

10

73

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

133

352/1

00

08

84

352/2

00

05

56

341/3

00

09

55

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/252/2017-ओआर-I/ई-21033]

पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 11th January, 2018

S.O. 54.— Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural

Gas, published in the Gazette of India No. 948 Part-II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii) dated 06.04.2017 vide S.O. Number

1073 (E) dated 03.04.2017 issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals pipelines

(Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) the Central

Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land situated in Mandal Tallapudi, District West

Godavari in Andhra Pradesh State, specified in the schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying

pipeline for the transportation of petroleum products from Paradip in the State of Odisha to Hyderabad in the State of

Telangana by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the "Paradip–Hyderabad Pipeline Project".

And whereas the copies of the Gazette were made available to the public. And whereas the Competent

Authority has under Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, has submitted his report of Central Government.

And whereas, the Central Government after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land

is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of the user therein;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is

hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby directs that the right of user of the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the

Central Government, vests on the date of publication of the declaration, in Indian Oil Corporation Limited, free from

all encumbrances.

SCHEDULE

District : West Godavari

State : Andhra Pradesh

Name of Mandal

Name of Village

Survey No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Square Metre

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

Tallapudi

Bayyavaram

111/7

00

06

11

111/6

00

00

59

111/9

00

05

81

79/3

00

01

18

79/4

00

09

80

78/1

00

00

14

76/1

00

13

69

76/2

00

15

00

78/2

00

00

74

76/3

00

28

25

Tallapudi

Ragolapalli

261/1A

00

08

97

260/5

00

17

95

260/4

00

12

07

254/2

00

31

35

134

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

254/1

00

16

46

251/2

00

02

38

251/1

00

11

18

250/4

00

00

08

252/6

00

10

29

250/2

00

09

22

250/1

00

13

88

249/4

00

17

86

Tallapudi

Tupakulagudem

247

00

00

90

241

00

26

64

240

00

12

39

232/3

00

04

90

232/4

00

19

00

234

00

10

62

225/1

00

01

42

225/3

00

16

20

225/4

00

13

11

142/2

00

18

33

142/1

00

00

66

142/3

00

15

64

142/4

00

19

59

145

00

44

18

161/1

00

05

11

161/2

00

10

71

162/1

00

05

71

162/4

00

01

28

180

00

03

57

Tallapudi

Annadevarapeta

216/1

00

17

84

217

00

29

77

214

00

27

12

213

00

00

03

221/1

00

19

63

221/4

00

00

03

221/3

00

09

06

221/2

00

08

70

228/3

00

12

87

229

00

19

09

281/1

00

12

56

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

135

281/2

00

12

71

279/1

00

00

0.19

289

00

17

65

290/2

00

17

42

258/1

00

10

60

273/2

00

09

01

273/1

00

08

17

272/3

00

07

20

272/2

00

03

40

260/1

00

04

04

263/4B

00

02

97

263/3

00

08

48

263/2

00

07

52

263/1

00

08

14

270

00

16

34

358

00

27

65

347

00

00

24

349

00

37

66

348

00

02

02

351/2

00

30

09

352/3A

00

10

73

352/1

00

08

84

352/2

00

05

56

341/3

00

09

55

[F. No. R-11025(11)/252/2017-OR-I/E-21033]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

नई द ली, 11 जनवरी, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 55

55

55

55.— के56ीय सरकार को लोकिहत मH यह आवfयक तीत होता है क पारादीप (ओिड़शा) से हैदराबाद (तेलंगाना)

तक पेWोिलयम उVपाद% के प!रवहन के िलए इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपOरेशन िलिमटेड के ,ारा "पारादीप -हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन" िबछाई जानी

चािहए;

और के56ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन िबछाने के योजन के िलए यह आवfयक तीत होता है क ऐसी भूिम मH जो इस से

उपाबT अनुसूची मH वNणत है और िजस मH उ0 पाइपलाइन िबछाएं जाने का ताव है, उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन कया जाए;

अत: अब, के56ीय सरकार, पेWोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइ5स (भूिम मH उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन) अिधिनयम,1962

(1962 का 50) क धारा 3 क उप-धारा (1) ,ारा द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए, उस भूिम मH उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन करने

के अपने आशय क घोषणा करती है;

कोई Žि0, जो उ0 अनुसूची मH वNणत भूिम मH िहतबT है, उस तारीख से िजसको इस अिधसूचना से यु0 भारत के राजपK

क ितयाँ साधारण जनता को उपलrध करा दी जाती है, इ\ कस दन के भीतर भूिम के नीचे पाइपलाइन िबछाए जाने के िलए उसमH

136

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

उपयोग के अिधकार के अजन के स ब5ध मH 8ी दलीप कुमार महांित, सƒम ािधकारी, इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपOरेशन िलिमटेड, पारादीप -

हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन प!रयोजना, तृतीय तल, आलोक भारती टावर ,शहीद नगर,भुवनेf वर -751007, ओिड़शा को िलिखत gप मH

आƒेप भेज सकेगा I

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/236/2017-ओआर-I/ई-13717]

पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 11th January, 2018

S.O. 55.— Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the

transportation of petroleum products from Paradip (Odisha) to Hyderabad (Telangana), “Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline”

should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

तहसील-जटणी

िजला - खोTा

राhय–ओिड़शा

गाँव का नाम

nलॉट नं.

ƒेKफल

हे\टयर

एयर

वग मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

पािGडआबील

428

00

21

56

434

00

01

09

382

00

09

28

381

00

04

99

361

00

05

83

360

00

11

02

357

00

01

72

359

00

00

69

358

00

00

73

354

00

00

15

440

00

01

86

441

00

00

55

442

00

11

92

427

00

01

53

426

00

01

46

348

00

02

43

344

00

00

72

345

00

00

10

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

137

And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary

to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the

schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and

Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby

declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty-one days from the date on

which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the general public, object in

writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Sri Dillip Kumar

Mohanty, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline Project, 3rd Floor, Alok

Bharati Tower, Saheed Nagar, Bhubaneswar- 751007, (Odisha).

SCHEDULE

Tehsil : JATANI

District : KHORDHA

State : ODISHA

Name of the Village

Plot No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

PANDIABIL

428

00

21

56

434

00

01

09

382

00

09

28

381

00

04

99

361

00

05

83

360

00

11

02

357

00

01

72

359

00

00

69

358

00

00

73

354

00

00

15

440

00

01

86

441

00

00

55

442

00

11

92

427

00

01

53

426

00

01

46

348

00

02

43

344

00

00

72

345

00

00

10

[F. No. R-11025(11)/236/2017-OR-I/E-13717]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

नई द ली, 11 जनवरी, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 56

56

56

56.— के56ीय सरकार को ऐसा तीत होता है क लोक िहत मH यह आवfयक है क हदीया - बरौनी पाइपलाइन

पा!रयोजना के अ5तगत पेWोिलयम पदाथu के प!रवहन हेतु पि‡म बंगाल राhय के हदीया !रफ़ाइनरी से िबहार राhय के बरौनी

!रफ़ाइनरी तक इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपOरेशन िलिमटेड ,ारा पाइपलाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए;

138

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

और के56ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन िबछाने के योजन के िलए यह आवfयक तीत होता है क उस भूिम मH िजसके

भीतर उ0 पाइपलाइन िबछाई जाने का ताव है और जो इस अिधसूचना से संलˆ अनुसूची मे वNणत है, उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन

कया जाए ;

अतः अब, के56ीय सरकार, पेWोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइंस (भूिम मH उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन) अिधिनयम, 1962

(1962 का 50) क धारा 3 क उप धारा (1) ,ारा दत शि0य% का योग करते 3ए, उस भूिम मH उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन करने

के अपने आशय क घोषणा करती है ;

कोई Žि0, जो उ0 अनुसूची मH वNणत भूिम मH िहतबT है, उस तारीख से िजसको, भारत के राजपK मH यथा कािशत इस

अिधसूचना क ितयाँ साधारण जनता को उपलrध करा दी जाती ह, इ\ कस दन के अ5दर, भूिम के भीतर पाइपलाइन िबछाए जाने

हेतु उपयोग के अिधकार के अजन के िलए, 8ी भुवनेf वर िम8ा, से॰ िन॰ अपर सिचव िबहार सरकार व सƒम ािधकारी, इंिडयन ऑयल

कॉपOरेशन िलिमटेड (पाइपलाइंस िडिवजन), बी॰ के॰ पी॰ एल॰ मुsयालय प!रसर, पो॰ बरौनी आयल !रफ़ाइनरी, िजला बेगूसराय,

िपन– 851114 (िबहार) को िलिखत gप मे आƒेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

िजला : पटना राhय : िबहार

अंचल

मौज़ा का नाम

सव / nलाट न बर

ƒेKफल

हे\टेयर

एयर

वग मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

मोकामा

जलाल पुर नौरंगा - 13

631

00

01

06

630

00

12

71

2677

00

09

93

629

00

07

37

628

00

06

54

627

00

05

57

626

00

06

52

625

00

09

15

624

00

02

76

442

00

01

85

443

00

02

84

162

00

14

95

161

00

03

75

160

00

04

84

134

00

09

01

141

00

03

60

139

00

04

12

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

139

140

00

02

75

138

00

01

81

130

00

03

36

143

00

13

77

144

00

10

13

145

00

00

59

126

00

06

61

मोकामा

राम पुर डुमरा - 15

1423

00

00

62

1422

00

17

59

1421

00

18

47

1377

00

18

47

1378

00

01

75

1356

00

13

02

1311

00

01

18

1312

00

08

00

1313

00

07

46

1314

00

00

52

1286

00

10

43

1277

00

09

48

1278

00

09

05

3928

00

15

02

1145

00

20

88

1150

00

03

20

1148

00

10

08

1147

00

14

98

3707

00

00

20

मोकामा

मरांची - 19

1277

00

14

55

1400

00

05

68

1271

00

30

68

140

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1266

00

11

99

1425

00

03

79

1426

00

00

33

1427

00

08

02

1428

00

04

08

1429

00

03

04

1430

00

03

71

1263

00

05

47

1435

00

05

28

1455

00

00

20

1456

00

06

63

1457

00

02

38

8555

00

05

26

1459

00

03

11

1487

00

16

68

1488

00

14

28

8520

00

05

38

1561

00

04

17

1563

00

01

99

1564

00

02

82

1565

00

02

81

1570

00

06

21

1571

00

09

58

1572

00

03

58

1573

00

06

02

1654

00

03

08

1653

00

01

54

1657

00

02

52

8523

00

02

20

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

141

1658

00

04

67

1659

00

02

75

1660

00

00

33

1664

00

06

26

1663

00

01

19

1679

00

05

81

1680

00

03

63

8583

00

02

38

1681

00

00

40

8582

00

11

70

8581

00

04

50

8160

00

05

43

8170

00

00

20

8169

00

01

87

8167

00

01

99

8166

00

02

66

8165

00

02

62

8164

00

01

84

8163

00

02

57

8162

00

02

75

8161

00

03

14

521

00

03

07

519

00

03

31

520

00

07

10

517

00

00

20

8181

00

03

63

8207

00

07

88

8206

00

01

54

356

00

03

18

355

00

00

25

354

00

26

08

142

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

353

00

04

69

305

00

00

99

306

00

02

32

8228

00

03

08

303

00

05

28

304

00

01

36

301

00

06

32

283

00

05

49

280

00

12

35

8241

00

03

89

255

00

06

00

253

00

05

12

247

00

10

29

241

00

03

80

8274

00

02

98

8273

00

04

50

240

00

04

35

8279

00

03

19

8278

00

03

00

191

00

07

86

190

00

07

07

189

00

07

73

8136

00

04

54

185

00

03

52

168

00

02

14

169

00

06

10

164

00

05

45

136

00

11

64

135

00

03

10

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

143

137

00

03

73

117

00

03

07

116

00

03

46

97

00

31

36

82

00

07

83

70

00

10

73

71

00

02

01

65

00

07

60

62

00

05

81

61

00

07

90

49

00

08

49

8087

00

01

70

8080

00

01

80

8068

00

04

24

8057

00

00

53

8058

00

06

34

41

00

13

15

39

00

06

49

38

00

32

45

37

00

00

81

मोकामा

हिथदह खुरद - 21

564

00

00

20

563

00

00

64

562

00

03

62

561

00

03

19

560

00

01

65

559

00

01

23

558

00

00

77

557

00

00

42

555

00

02

86

144

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

556

00

06

25

514

00

06

15

513

00

06

18

512

00

11

71

302

00

07

25

507

00

12

55

475

00

08

41

476

00

09

73

477

00

14

09

474

00

00

20

500

00

00

20

478

00

00

24

473

00

06

22

464

00

04

34

465

00

05

69

408

00

02

82

405

00

06

86

404

00

04

39

400

00

00

20

402

00

17

57

390

00

03

79

389

00

01

28

388

00

00

20

508

00

10

61

509

00

10

28

520

00

11

36

542

00

01

21

521

00

00

27

541

00

04

94

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

145

540

00

10

85

588

00

06

84

589

00

01

64

587

00

01

04

590

00

03

40

591

00

04

05

586

00

00

20

592

00

09

05

593

00

01

39

533

00

24

39

607

00

00

20

608

00

04

06

609

00

01

25

611

00

05

26

612

00

01

42

613

00

01

10

614

00

02

01

616

00

07

37

617

00

15

33

647

00

04

85

648

00

05

30

650

00

02

52

653

00

01

46

657

00

01

40

658

00

02

50

659

00

11

00

660

00

03

01

661

00

03

22

मोकामा

हिथदहबुजुŒग - 20

2421

00

22

30

2419

00

03

01

146

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2416

00

03

90

2448

00

02

73

2408

00

00

96

2409

00

10

92

1099

00

03

40

2403

00

00

56

2402

00

09

27

2399

00

03

33

2386

00

03

44

2384

00

01

14

2380

00

01

52

2373

00

01

74

2368

00

01

15

2369

00

00

29

2363

00

01

84

2362

00

01

29

2360

00

00

98

2359

00

01

47

2354

00

01

41

2353

00

02

17

2352

00

02

41

2209

00

02

28

2211

00

02

94

2213

00

01

35

2214

00

01

94

2215

00

04

13

2218

00

01

78

2219

00

01

62

2222

00

00

20

2224

00

02

90

2225

00

03

44

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

147

2228

00

02

99

2230

00

00

20

2229

00

03

70

2155

00

02

02

2156

00

00

86

2180

00

00

57

2257

00

02

50

2153

00

00

49

2158

00

01

35

2152

00

00

47

2159

00

03

87

2145

00

03

96

2140

00

02

15

2139

00

02

01

2134

00

01

68

2138

00

00

26

2135

00

00

87

2122

00

08

02

2121

00

08

72

2136

00

00

75

2115

00

05

09

2114

00

03

41

2059

00

07

31

1149

00

03

76

2029

00

02

85

2030

00

01

60

2031

00

02

68

2028

00

00

41

2032

00

02

03

2017

00

03

34

148

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2013

00

02

18

2008

00

03

16

2007

00

00

39

2006

00

00

26

2002

00

10

59

2009

00

00

44

2010

00

01

19

1653

00

04

73

1595

00

00

20

1651

00

03

94

1652

00

02

41

1654

00

00

29

1614

00

05

82

1650

00

02

01

1647

00

00

94

1617

00

00

66

1618

00

01

01

1616

00

05

91

1615

00

04

17

1631

00

07

29

1630

00

02

45

1632

00

00

20

2833

00

04

85

2834

00

00

20

252

00

06

29

251

00

00

20

250

00

02

17

231

00

01

06

220

00

00

50

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

149

221

00

24

97

2847

00

07

80

मोकामा

कसया दयारामराचk - 10

639

00

03

07

640

00

01

49

641

00

01

81

644

00

04

96

645

00

02

24

646

00

01

16

647

00

00

94

648

00

02

41

649

00

01

74

652

00

02

20

656

00

03

34

655

00

00

20

662

00

01

71

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/251/2017-ओआर-I/ई-20885]

पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 11th January, 2018

S.O. 56.— Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the

transportation of Petroleum Products from Haldia Refinery in the state of West Bengal to Barauni Refinery in the State

of Bihar a pipeline should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited.

And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary

to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the

Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and

Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby

declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on

which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the general public, object in

writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri. Bhubneshwar

Mishra, Additional Secretary (Retd.), Govt. of Bihar & Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Pipeline

Division, BKPL Head Quarter, Post- Barauni Oil Refinery, District – Begusarai, Bihar – 851114.

SCHEDULE

District : Patna State : Bihar

Anchal

Name of Mouza

Survey / Plot

No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Square

Metre

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

150

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Mokama

Jalalpur Nauranga - 13

631

00

01

06

630

00

12

71

2677

00

09

93

629

00

07

37

628

00

06

54

627

00

05

57

626

00

06

52

625

00

09

15

624

00

02

76

442

00

01

85

443

00

02

84

162

00

14

95

161

00

03

75

160

00

04

84

134

00

09

01

141

00

03

60

139

00

04

12

140

00

02

75

138

00

01

81

130

00

03

36

143

00

13

77

144

00

10

13

145

00

00

59

126

00

06

61

Mokama

Rampur Dumra - 15

1423

00

00

62

1422

00

17

59

1421

00

18

47

1377

00

18

47

1378

00

01

75

1356

00

13

02

1311

00

01

18

1312

00

08

00

1313

00

07

46

1314

00

00

52

1286

00

10

43

1277

00

09

48

1278

00

09

05

3928

00

15

02

1145

00

20

88

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

151

1150

00

03

20

1148

00

10

08

1147

00

14

98

3707

00

00

20

Mokama

Maranchi -19

1277

00

14

55

1400

00

05

68

1271

00

30

68

1266

00

11

99

1425

00

03

79

1426

00

00

33

1427

00

08

02

1428

00

04

08

1429

00

03

04

1430

00

03

71

1263

00

05

47

1435

00

05

28

1455

00

00

20

1456

00

06

63

1457

00

02

38

8555

00

05

26

1459

00

03

11

1487

00

16

68

1488

00

14

28

8520

00

05

38

1561

00

04

17

1563

00

01

99

1564

00

02

82

1565

00

02

81

1570

00

06

21

1571

00

09

58

1572

00

03

58

1573

00

06

02

1654

00

03

08

1653

00

01

54

1657

00

02

52

8523

00

02

20

1658

00

04

67

1659

00

02

75

1660

00

00

33

152

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1664

00

06

26

1663

00

01

19

1679

00

05

81

1680

00

03

63

8583

00

02

38

1681

00

00

40

8582

00

11

70

8581

00

04

50

8160

00

05

43

8170

00

00

20

8169

00

01

87

8167

00

01

99

8166

00

02

66

8165

00

02

62

8164

00

01

84

8163

00

02

57

8162

00

02

75

8161

00

03

14

521

00

03

07

519

00

03

31

520

00

07

10

517

00

00

20

8181

00

03

63

8207

00

07

88

8206

00

01

54

356

00

03

18

355

00

00

25

354

00

26

08

353

00

04

69

305

00

00

99

306

00

02

32

8228

00

03

08

303

00

05

28

304

00

01

36

301

00

06

32

283

00

05

49

280

00

12

35

8241

00

03

89

255

00

06

00

253

00

05

12

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

153

247

00

10

29

241

00

03

80

8274

00

02

98

8273

00

04

50

240

00

04

35

8279

00

03

19

8278

00

03

00

191

00

07

86

190

00

07

07

189

00

07

73

8136

00

04

54

185

00

03

52

168

00

02

14

169

00

06

10

164

00

05

45

136

00

11

64

135

00

03

10

137

00

03

73

117

00

03

07

116

00

03

46

97

00

31

36

82

00

07

83

70

00

10

73

71

00

02

01

65

00

07

60

62

00

05

81

61

00

07

90

49

00

08

49

8087

00

01

70

8080

00

01

80

8068

00

04

24

8057

00

00

53

8058

00

06

34

41

00

13

15

39

00

06

49

38

00

32

45

37

00

00

81

Mokama

Hathidhah Khurd - 21

564

00

00

20

563

00

00

64

562

00

03

62

561

00

03

19

154

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

560

00

01

65

559

00

01

23

558

00

00

77

557

00

00

42

555

00

02

86

556

00

06

25

514

00

06

15

513

00

06

18

512

00

11

71

302

00

07

25

507

00

12

55

475

00

08

41

476

00

09

73

477

00

14

09

474

00

00

20

500

00

00

20

478

00

00

24

473

00

06

22

464

00

04

34

465

00

05

69

408

00

02

82

405

00

06

86

404

00

04

39

400

00

00

20

402

00

17

57

390

00

03

79

389

00

01

28

388

00

00

20

508

00

10

61

509

00

10

28

520

00

11

36

542

00

01

21

521

00

00

27

541

00

04

94

540

00

10

85

588

00

06

84

589

00

01

64

587

00

01

04

590

00

03

40

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

155

591

00

04

05

586

00

00

20

592

00

09

05

593

00

01

39

533

00

24

39

607

00

00

20

608

00

04

06

609

00

01

25

611

00

05

26

612

00

01

42

613

00

01

10

614

00

02

01

616

00

07

37

617

00

15

33

647

00

04

85

648

00

05

30

650

00

02

52

653

00

01

46

657

00

01

40

658

00

02

50

659

00

11

00

660

00

03

01

661

00

03

22

Mokama

Hathidah Buzurg - 20

2421

00

22

30

2419

00

03

01

2416

00

03

90

2448

00

02

73

2408

00

00

96

2409

00

10

92

1099

00

03

40

2403

00

00

56

2402

00

09

27

2399

00

03

33

2386

00

03

44

2384

00

01

14

2380

00

01

52

2373

00

01

74

2368

00

01

15

2369

00

00

29

156

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2363

00

01

84

2362

00

01

29

2360

00

00

98

2359

00

01

47

2354

00

01

41

2353

00

02

17

2352

00

02

41

2209

00

02

28

2211

00

02

94

2213

00

01

35

2214

00

01

94

2215

00

04

13

2218

00

01

78

2219

00

01

62

2222

00

00

20

2224

00

02

90

2225

00

03

44

2228

00

02

99

2230

00

00

20

2229

00

03

70

2155

00

02

02

2156

00

00

86

2180

00

00

57

2257

00

02

50

2153

00

00

49

2158

00

01

35

2152

00

00

47

2159

00

03

87

2145

00

03

96

2140

00

02

15

2139

00

02

01

2134

00

01

68

2138

00

00

26

2135

00

00

87

2122

00

08

02

2121

00

08

72

2136

00

00

75

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

157

2115

00

05

09

2114

00

03

41

2059

00

07

31

1149

00

03

76

2029

00

02

85

2030

00

01

60

2031

00

02

68

2028

00

00

41

2032

00

02

03

2017

00

03

34

2013

00

02

18

2008

00

03

16

2007

00

00

39

2006

00

00

26

2002

00

10

59

2009

00

00

44

2010

00

01

19

1653

00

04

73

1595

00

00

20

1651

00

03

94

1652

00

02

41

1654

00

00

29

1614

00

05

82

1650

00

02

01

1647

00

00

94

1617

00

00

66

1618

00

01

01

1616

00

05

91

1615

00

04

17

1631

00

07

29

1630

00

02

45

1632

00

00

20

2833

00

04

85

2834

00

00

20

252

00

06

29

251

00

00

20

250

00

02

17

231

00

01

06

220

00

00

50

158

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

221

00

24

97

2847

00

07

80

Mokama

Kasaya Diyara Maranchi - 10

639

00

03

07

640

00

01

49

641

00

01

81

644

00

04

96

645

00

02

24

646

00

01

16

647

00

00

94

648

00

02

41

649

00

01

74

652

00

02

20

656

00

03

34

655

00

00

20

662

00

01

71

[F. No. R-11025(11)/251/2017-OR-I/E-20885]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

नई द ली, 11 जनवरी, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 57

57

57

57.— के56ीय सरकार ने पेWोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूिम मH उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन) अिधिनयम,

1962 (1962 का 50) (िजसे इसमH इसके प‡ात उ0 अिधिनयम कहा गया है) क धारा 3 उप धारा (1) के अधीन जारी क गई, भारत

सरकार के पेWोिलयम और ाकृितक गैस मंKालय क अिधसूचना का.आ. 1071(अ) तारीख 03.04.2017 िजसका काशन भारत के

राजपK संsया 948, भाग II, खGड 3, उप खGड (II) तारीख 06.04.2017 मH कया गया है। इस अिधसूचना मH संलˆ अनुसूची मH

िविनzदp आंLदेश राhय के मंडल : को’यालगुडेम िजला: वेट गोदावरी क भूिम मH, ओडीशा राhय मH पारादीप से तेलंगाना राhय मH

हैदराबाद तक पेWोिलयम उVपाद% के प!रवहन के िलए इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपOरेशन िलिमटेड के ,ारा $याि5वत कए जा रहे “पारादीप-

हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन प!रयोजना” के संबंध मH पाइपलाइन िबछाने के योजन के िलए उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन करने के िलए अपने

आशय क घोषणा क थी:

और उ0 राजपK अिधसूचना क ितयाँ जनता को उपलrध करा दी गई थk। और उ0 अिधिनयम क धारा 6 क उपधारा (1)

के अनुसरण मH सƒम ािधकारी नH के56ीय सरकार को अपनी !रपोट दे दी है।

और के56ीय सरकार ने उ0 !रपोट पर िवचार करने के प‡ात और यह समाधान हो जाने पर क उ0 भूिम पाइपलाइन

िबछाने के िलए अपेिƒत है, उसमH उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन करने का िविनf चय कया है:

अतः अब, के56ीय सरकार उ0 अिधिनयम क धारा 6 क उपधारा (1) ,ारा द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए एतद् ,ारा

घोषणा करती है क इस अिधसूचना से संलˆ अनुसूची मH िविनzदp भूिम मH पाइपलाइन िबछाने के उपयोग का अिधकार अNजत कया

जाए:

और के56ीय सरकार उ0 अिधिनयम क धारा 6 क उपधारा (4) ,ारा द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए, यह िनदश देती है

क उ0 भूिम मH उपयोग का अिधकार इस घोषणा के काशन क तारीख से के56ीय सरकार मH िनिहत होने के बजाए सभी िबलंगम% से

मु0 होकर इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपOरेशन िलिमटेड मH िनिहत होगा।

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

िजला: वेट गोदावरी राhय: आ5Lदेश

मंडल का नाम

ाम का नाम

सव न बर

ƒेKफल

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

159

हे\टेयर

एयर

वग मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

को’यालागुडेम

कंका6पुरम

95

00

13

97

98/1

00

00

35

91

00

59

02

88/2

00

05

78

89

00

51

75

68/4

00

04

25

69/1

00

16

06

69/2

00

16

13

70/1

00

02

12

65/3

00

38

19

65/1

00

08

71

64/2

00

19

90

55/3

00

10

92

55/1

00

16

13

55/2

00

05

01

59/9

00

05

40

59/8

00

05

48

59/7

00

06

35

59/6

00

12

83

59/4

00

05

75

59/3

00

03

20

59/1

00

03

18

को’यालागुडेम

येर पेटा

232/4

00

03

31

233

00

31

73

230/2

00

25

57

229/1

00

08

81

235/1

00

18

88

228/3

00

17

01

236

00

02

68

160

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

237/1

00

22

93

221/3

00

07

28

220/3

00

14

44

220/1

00

23

55

220/2

00

06

68

218

00

00

59

198/2

00

00

0.19

198/3

00

17

97

199

00

00

81

200/3

00

15

99

200/4

00

21

18

212/2

00

03

53

212/1

00

05

05

212/4

00

00

07

200/5

00

04

11

201/6

00

15

59

201/5

00

03

81

201/4

00

09

28

201/3

00

02

81

202/1

00

09

15

183

00

42

53

को’यालागुडेम

राजवाराम

518

00

12

12

516

00

22

11

509/1

00

01

55

509/2

00

16

88

510

00

02

93

508

00

27

81

507

00

10

81

495

00

05

84

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

161

496/6

00

04

99

496/5

00

03

70

496/4

00

01

73

496/3

00

00

06

490/1

00

18

65

490/2

00

16

88

488/1

00

00

08

488/2

00

01

90

489/2

00

07

15

486/2

00

21

19

485

00

45

21

484/1

00

01

09

245/2

00

00

09

248/3

00

07

36

248/2

00

14

71

248/1

00

03

24

245/1

00

17

28

246/2

00

03

95

246/1

00

01

49

239/1

00

13

31

239/3

00

18

38

239/2

00

07

35

238/1

00

09

87

225/1

00

06

01

225/2

00

20

57

225/3

00

06

04

223/4

00

09

60

223/3

00

08

57

223/2

00

07

97

223/1

00

01

35

162

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

222/B

00

15

25

222/A

00

11

85

229

00

00

90

220/3

00

13

21

220/2

00

22

23

220/1

00

01

86

218

00

04

52

219/1

00

10

90

219/2

00

07

15

219/3A

00

06

75

212

00

00

14

211/1

00

17

81

210/2A

00

21

88

210/1A

00

15

98

210/3A

00

21

88

209/2A

00

18

65

209/1A

00

27

46

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/252/2017-ओआर-I/ई-21033]

पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 11th January, 2018

S.O. 57.— Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural

Gas, published in the Gazette of India No. 948 Part-II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii) dated 06.04.2017 vide S.O. Number

1071 (E) dated 03.04.2017 issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals pipelines

(Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) the Central

Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land situated in Mandal Koyyalagudem, District

West Godavari in Andhra Pradesh State, specified in the schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of

laying pipeline for the transportation of petroleum products from Paradip in the State of Odisha to Hyderabad in the

State of Telangana by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the "Paradip–Hyderabad Pipeline Project".

And whereas the copies of the Gazette were made available to the public. And whereas the Competent

Authority has under Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, has submitted his report of Central Government.

And whereas, the Central Government after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land

is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of the user therein;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is

hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby directs that the right of user of the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

163

Central Government, vests on the date of publication of the declaration, in India Oil Corporation Limited, free from all

encumbrances.

SCHEDULE

District : West Godavari

State : Andhra Pradesh

Name of Mandal

Name of Village

Survey No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Square Metre

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

Koyyalagudem

Kankadripuram

95

00

13

97

98/1

00

00

35

91

00

59

02

88/2

00

05

78

89

00

51

75

68/4

00

04

25

69/1

00

16

06

69/2

00

16

13

70/1

00

02

12

65/3

00

38

19

65/1

00

08

71

64/2

00

19

90

55/3

00

10

92

55/1

00

16

13

55/2

00

05

01

59/9

00

05

40

59/8

00

05

48

59/7

00

06

35

59/6

00

12

83

59/4

00

05

75

59/3

00

03

20

59/1

00

03

18

Koyyalagudem

Yerrampeta

232/4

00

03

31

233

00

31

73

230/2

00

25

57

229/1

00

08

81

235/1

00

18

88

228/3

00

17

01

236

00

02

68

237/1

00

22

93

221/3

00

07

28

220/3

00

14

44

220/1

00

23

55

164

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

220/2

00

06

68

218

00

00

59

198/2

00

00

0.19

198/3

00

17

97

199

00

00

81

200/3

00

15

99

200/4

00

21

18

212/2

00

03

53

212/1

00

05

05

212/4

00

00

07

200/5

00

04

11

201/6

00

15

59

201/5

00

03

81

201/4

00

09

28

201/3

00

02

81

202/1

00

09

15

183

00

42

53

Koyyalagudem

Rajavaram

518

00

12

12

516

00

22

11

509/1

00

01

55

509/2

00

16

88

510

00

02

93

508

00

27

81

507

00

10

81

495

00

05

84

496/6

00

04

99

496/5

00

03

70

496/4

00

01

73

496/3

00

00

06

490/1

00

18

65

490/2

00

16

88

488/1

00

00

08

488/2

00

01

90

489/2

00

07

15

486/2

00

21

19

485

00

45

21

484/1

00

01

09

245/2

00

00

09

248/3

00

07

36

248/2

00

14

71

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

165

248/1

00

03

24

245/1

00

17

28

246/2

00

03

95

246/1

00

01

49

239/1

00

13

31

239/3

00

18

38

239/2

00

07

35

238/1

00

09

87

225/1

00

06

01

225/2

00

20

57

225/3

00

06

04

223/4

00

09

60

223/3

00

08

57

223/2

00

07

97

223/1

00

01

35

222/B

00

15

25

222/A

00

11

85

229

00

00

90

220/3

00

13

21

220/2

00

22

23

220/1

00

01

86

218

00

04

52

219/1

00

10

90

219/2

00

07

15

219/3A

00

06

75

212

00

00

14

211/1

00

17

81

210/2A

00

21

88

210/1A

00

15

98

210/3A

00

21

88

209/2A

00

18

65

209/1A

00

27

46

[F. No. R-11025(11)/252/2017-OR-I/E-21033]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

नई द ली, 11 जनवरी, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 58

58

58

58.— के56ीय सरकार ने पेWोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूिम मH उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन) अिधिनयम,

1962 (1962 का 50) (िजसे इसमH इसके प‡ात उ0 अिधिनयम कहा गया है) क धारा 3 उप धारा (1) के अधीन जारी क गई, भारत

सरकार के पेWोिलयम और ाकृितक गैस मंKालय क अिधसूचना का.आ. 1072(अ) तारीख 03.04.2017 िजसका काशन भारत के

राजपK संsया 948, भाग II, खGड 3, उप खGड (II) तारीख 06.04.2017 मH कया गया है। इस अिधसूचना मH संलˆ अनुसूची मH

166

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

िविनzदp आंLदेश राhय के मंडल : पोलावरम िजला: पि‡म गोदावरी क भूिम मH, ओडीशा राhय मH पारादीप से तेलंगाना राhय मH

हैदराबाद तक पेWोिलयम उVपाद% के प!रवहन के िलए इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपरेशन िलिमटेड के ,ारा $याि5वत कए जा रहे “पारादीप-

हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन प!रयोजना” के संबंध मH पाइपलाइन िबछाने के योजन के िलए उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन करने के िलए अपने

आशय क घोषणा क थी:

और उ0 राजपK अिधसूचना क ितयाँ जनता को उपलrध करा दी गई थk। और उ0 अिधिनयम क धारा 6 क उपधारा (1)

के अनुसरण मH सƒम ािधकारी नH के56ीय सरकार को अपनी !रपोट दे दी है।

और के56ीय सरकार ने उ0 !रपोट पर िवचार करने के प‡ात और यह समाधान हो जाने पर क उ0 भूिम पाइपलाइन

िबछाने के िलए अपेिƒत है, उसमH उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन करने का िविनf चय कया है:

अतः अब, के56ीय सरकार उ0 अिधिनयम क धारा 6 क उपधारा (1) ,ारा द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए ,rn~}kjk

घोषणा करती है क इस अिधसूचना से संलˆ अनुसूिच मH िविनzदp भूिम मH पाइपलाइन िबछाने के उपयोग का अिधकार अNजत कया

जाए:

और के56ीय सरकार उ0 अिधिनयम क धारा 6 क उपधारा (4) ,ारा द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए, यह िनदश देती है

क उ0 भूिम मH उपयोग का अिधकार इस घोषणा के काशन क तारीख से के56ीय सरकार मH िनिहत होने के बजाए सभी िबलंगम% से

मु0 होकर इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपरेशन िलिमटेड मH िनिहत होगा।

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

िजला: वेट गोदावरी राhय: आ5Lदेश

मंडल का नाम

ाम का नाम

सव न बर

ƒेK फल

हे\टेयर

एयर

वग मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

पोलावरम

गुटाला

833/3A

00

09

98

833/2

00

03

93

833/4

00

07

84

831/2

00

02

46

831/3

00

28

12

832/1

00

07

86

806/2

00

21

78

806/1

00

01

96

807

00

26

72

797

00

01

18

796/2

00

00

80

789/3

00

36

11

789/2

00

18

47

790/1A

00

05

85

790/3

00

15

14

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

167

790/2

00

08

57

791/2

00

01

07

791/1

00

12

57

774/1

00

04

54

774/2

00

21

33

773/1

00

11

88

768/7

00

13

18

769/4

00

15

80

769/3

00

21

96

769/2

00

04

51

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/252/2017-ओआर-I/ई-21033]

पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 11th January, 2018

S.O. 58.— Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural

Gas, published in the Gazette of India No. 948 Part-II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii) dated 06.04.2017 vide S.O. Number

1072 (E) dated 03.04.2017 issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals pipelines

(Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) the Central

Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land situated in Mandal polavaram, District West

Godavari in Andhra Pradesh State, specified in the schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying

pipeline for the transportation of petroleum products from Paradip in the State of Odisha to Hyderabad in the State of

Telangana by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the "Paradip–Hyderabad Pipeline Project".

And whereas the copies of the Gazette were made available to the public. And whereas the Competent

Authority has under Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, has submitted his report of Central Government.

And whereas, the Central Government after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land

is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of the user therein;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is

hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby directs that the right of user of the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the

Central Government, vests on the date of publication of the declaration, in India Oil Corporation Limited, free from all

encumbrances.

SCHEDULE

District : West Godavari

State : Andhra Pradesh

Name of Mandal

Name of Village

Survey No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Square Metre

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

Polavaram

Gutala

833/3A

00

09

98

168

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

833/2

00

03

93

833/4

00

07

84

831/2

00

02

46

831/3

00

28

12

832/1

00

07

86

806/2

00

21

78

806/1

00

01

96

807

00

26

72

797

00

01

18

796/2

00

00

80

789/3

00

36

11

789/2

00

18

47

790/1A

00

05

85

790/3

00

15

14

790/2

00

08

57

791/2

00

01

07

791/1

00

12

57

774/1

00

04

54

774/2

00

21

33

773/1

00

11

88

768/7

00

13

18

769/4

00

15

80

769/3

00

21

96

769/2

00

04

51

[F. No. R-11025(11)/252/2017-OR-I/E-21033]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

नई द ली, 11 जनवरी, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 59

59

59

59.—के56ीय सरकार ने पेWोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूिम मH उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन) अिधिनयम,

1962 (1962 का 50) (िजसे इसमH इसके प‡ात उ0 अिधिनयम कहा गया है) क धारा 3 उप धारा (1) के अधीन जारी क गई, भारत

सरकार के पेWोिलयम और ाकृितक गैस मंKालय क अिधसूचना का.आ. 1070(अ) तारीख 03.04.2017 िजसका काशन भारत के

राजपK संsया 947, भाग II, खGड 3, उप खGड (II) तारीख 06.04.2017 मH कया गया है। इस अिधसूचना मH संलˆ अनुसूची मH

िविनzदp आंLदेश राhय के मंडल : जंगारे†ीगूडेम िजला: पि‡म गोदावरी क भूिम मH, ओडीशा राhय मH पारादीप से तेलंगाना राhय मH

हैदराबाद तक पेWोिलयम उVपाद% के प!रवहन के िलए इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपरेशन िलिमटेड के ,ारा $याि5वत कए जा रहे “पारादीप-

हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन प!रयोजना” के संबंध मH पाइपलाइन िबछाने के योजन के िलए उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन करने के िलए अपने

आशय क घोषणा क थी:

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

169

और उ0 राजपK अिधसूचना क ितयाँ जनता को उपलrध करा दी गई थk। और उ0 अिधिनयम क धारा 6 क उपधारा (1)

के अनुसरण मH सƒम ािधकारी नH के56ीय सरकार को अपनी !रपोट दे दी है।

और के56ीय सरकार ने उ0 !रपोट पर िवचार करने के प‡ात और यह समाधान हो जाने पर क उ0 भूिम पाइपलाइन

िबछाने के िलए अपेिƒत है, उसमH उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन करने का िविनf चय कया है:

अतः अब, के56ीय सरकार उ0 अिधिनयम क धारा 6 क उपधारा (1) ,ारा द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए एतद् ,ारा

घोषणा करती है क इस अिधसूचना से संलˆ अनुसूिच मH िविनzदp भूिम मH पाइपलाइन िबछाने के उपयोग का अिधकार अNजत कया

जाए:

और के56ीय सरकार उ0 अिधिनयम क धारा 6 क उपधारा (4) ,ारा द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए, यह िनदश देती है

क उ0 भूिम मH उपयोग का अिधकार इस घोषणा के काशन क तारीख से के56ीय सरकार मH िनिहत होने के बजाए सभी िबलंगम% से

मु0 होकर इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपरेशन िलिमटेड मH िनिहत होगा।

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

िजला: वेट गोदावरी राhय: आ5Lदेश

मंडल का नाम

ाम का नाम

सव न बर

ƒेKफल

हे\टेयर

एयर

वग मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

जंगारे•ीगुडेम

िन मालागुडेम

199

00

00

10

198

00

31

14

254

00

61

85

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/252/2017-ओआर-I/ई-21033]

पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 11th January, 2018

S.O. 59.— Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural

Gas, published in the Gazette of India No. 947 Part-II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii) dated 06.04.2017 vide S.O. Number

1070 (E) dated 03.04.2017 issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals pipelines

(Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) the Central

Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land situated in Mandal Jangareddigudem, District

West Godavari in Andhra Pradesh State, specified in the schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of

laying pipeline for the transportation of petroleum products from Paradip in the State of Odisha to Hyderabad in the

State of Telangana by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the "Paradip–Hyderabad Pipeline Project".

And whereas the copies of the Gazette were made available to the public. And whereas the Competent

Authority has under Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, has submitted his report of Central Government.

And whereas, the Central Government after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land

is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of the user therein;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is

hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby directs that the right of user of the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the

170

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Central Government, vests on the date of publication of the declaration, in India Oil Corporation Limited, free from all

encumbrances.

SCHEDULE

District : West Godavari

State : Andhra Pradesh

Name of Mandal

Name of Village

Survey No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Square Metre

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

Jangareddigudem

Nimmalagudem

199

00

00

10

198

00

31

14

254

00

61

85

[F. No. R-11025(11)/252/2017-OR-I/E-21033]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

नई द ली, 11 जनवरी, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 60

60

60

60.— के56ीय सरकार ने पेWोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूिम मH उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन) अिधिनयम,

1962 (1962 का 50) (िजसे इसमH इसके प‡ात उ0 अिधिनयम कहा गया है) क धारा 3 उप धारा (1) के अधीन जारी क गई, भारत

सरकार के पेWोिलयम और ाकृितक गैस मंKालय क अिधसूचना का.आ. 1069(अ) तारीख 03.04.2017 िजसका काशन भारत के

राजपK संsया 947, भाग II, खGड 3, उप खGड (II) तारीख 06.04.2017 मH कया गया है। इस अिधसूचना मH संलˆ अनुसूची मH

िविनzदp आंLदेश राhय के मंडल: देवरापली िजला: वेट गोदावरी क भूिम मH, ओडीशा राhय मH पारादीप से तेलंगाना राhय मH

हैदराबाद तक पेWोिलयम उVपाद% के प!रवहन के िलए इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपरेशन िलिमटेड के ,ारा $याि5वत कए जा रहे “पारादीप-

हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन प!रयोजना” के संबंध मH पाइपलाइन िबछाने के योजन के िलए उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन करने के िलए अपने

आशय क घोषणा क थी:

और उ0 राजपK अिधसूचना क ितयाँ जनता को उपलrध करा दी गई थk। और उ0 अिधिनयम क धारा 6 क उपधारा (1)

के अनुसरण मH सƒम ािधकारी नH के56ीय सरकार को अपनी !रपोट दे दी है।

और के56ीय सरकार ने उ0 !रपोट पर िवचार करने के प‡ात और यह समाधान हो जाने पर क उ0 भूिम पाइपलाइन

िबछाने के िलए अपेिƒत है, उसमH उपयोग के अिधकार का अजन करने का िविनf चय कया है:

अतः अब, के56ीय सरकार उ0 अिधिनयम क धारा 6 क उपधारा (1) ,ारा द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए एतद् ,ारा

घोषणा करती है क इस अिधसूचना से संलˆ अनुसूिच मH िविनzदp भूिम मH पाइपलाइन िबछाने के उपयोग का अिधकार अNजत कया

जाए:

और के56ीय सरकार उ0 अिधिनयम क धारा 6 क उपधारा (4) ,ारा द- शि0य% का योग करते 3ए, यह िनदश देती है

क उ0 भूिम मH उपयोग का अिधकार इस घोषणा के काशन क तारीख से के56ीय सरकार मH िनिहत होने के बजाए सभी िबलंगम% से

मु0 होकर इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपरेशन िलिमटेड मH िनिहत होगा।

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

िजला: वेट गोदावरी राhय: आ5Lदेश

मंडल का नाम

ाम का नाम

सव न बर

ƒेKफल

हे\टेयर

एयर

वग मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

देवरापली

यदावोलु

153/1

00

02

84

153/2

00

15

33

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

171

156

00

34

71

157

00

08

79

184/4

00

01

39

184/2

00

42

37

173/2

00

45

57

173/3

00

02

95

174

00

17

64

175/2

00

11

66

178

00

06

84

176/2

00

44

48

177/1

00

27

51

107

00

46

42

109

00

01

70

108

00

01

61

119/3

00

02

23

110/2

00

17

94

110/3

00

05

90

119/2

00

00

39

119/1

00

07

02

118/8

00

16

27

118/5B

00

00

41

118/7C

00

07

58

255/2A

00

00

10

255/1D

00

02

03

255/1A

00

02

99

259

00

34

09

258

00

10

25

263

00

28

82

172

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

60

00

03

11

59/1

00

18

63

59/2

00

03

54

59/3

00

03

43

59/4

00

03

87

59/5

00

10

47

475/1

00

12

64

475/3

00

00

34

475/2

00

03

45

476

00

06

78

474/5

00

10

35

474/2

00

03

40

474/3

00

10

76

473

00

10

63

472/3

00

30

80

472/2

00

00

42

487/2

00

16

84

488/1

00

06

08

488/2

00

37

55

489/5

00

18

80

490

00

05

54

717/5

00

00

38

717/4

00

04

88

717/3

00

17

30

717/2

00

05

86

716/1

00

14

29

715

00

09

73

711

00

09

82

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

173

713

00

12

66

712

00

29

98

708

00

27

63

707

00

12

01

706

00

13

58

513/6

00

07

43

513/5

00

08

64

513/4

00

04

53

513/3

00

04

38

513/2

00

08

70

513/1

00

09

71

514

00

00

38

518

00

45

72

519/1

00

18

13

520/1

00

34

99

532/1

00

16

70

532/3

00

12

97

585

00

22

83

586/2

00

16

09

586/1

00

15

12

587/1

00

11

40

587/2

00

16

61

551

00

08

72

555

00

34

66

556/2B

00

03

96

556/2C

00

11

74

556/1

00

15

23

557/3

00

09

90

570

00

36

96

569

00

32

24

568

00

26

38

174

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/252/2017-ओआर-I/ई-21033]

पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 11th January, 2018

S.O. 60.— Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural

Gas, published in the Gazette of India No. 947 Part-II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii) dated 06.04.2017 vide S.O. Number

1069 (E) dated 03.04.2017 issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals pipelines

(Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) the Central

Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land situated in Mandal Devarapalli, District West

Godavari in Andhra Pradesh State, specified in the schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying

pipeline for the transportation of petroleum products from Paradip in the State of Odisha to Hyderabad in the State of

Telangana by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the "Paradip–Hyderabad Pipeline Project".

And whereas the copies of the Gazette were made available to the public. And whereas the Competent

Authority has under Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, has submitted his report of Central Government.

And whereas, the Central Government after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land

is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of the user therein;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is

hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby directs that the right of user of the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the

Central Government, vests on the date of publication of the declaration, in India Oil Corporation Limited, free from all

encumbrances.

SCHEDULE

District: West Godavari

State : Andhra Pradesh

Name of Mandal

Name of

Village

Survey No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Square Metre

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

Devarapalli

Yadavolu

153/1

00

02

84

153/2

00

15

33

156

00

34

71

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

175

157

00

08

79

184/4

00

01

39

184/2

00

42

37

173/2

00

45

57

173/3

00

02

95

174

00

17

64

175/2

00

11

66

178

00

06

84

176/2

00

44

48

177/1

00

27

51

107

00

46

42

109

00

01

70

108

00

01

61

119/3

00

02

23

110/2

00

17

94

110/3

00

05

90

119/2

00

00

39

119/1

00

07

02

118/8

00

16

27

118/5B

00

00

41

118/7C

00

07

58

255/2A

00

00

10

255/1D

00

02

03

255/1A

00

02

99

176

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

259

00

34

09

258

00

10

25

263

00

28

82

60

00

03

11

59/1

00

18

63

59/2

00

03

54

59/3

00

03

43

59/4

00

03

87

59/5

00

10

47

475/1

00

12

64

475/3

00

00

34

475/2

00

03

45

476

00

06

78

474/5

00

10

35

474/2

00

03

40

474/3

00

10

76

473

00

10

63

472/3

00

30

80

472/2

00

00

42

487/2

00

16

84

488/1

00

06

08

488/2

00

37

55

489/5

00

18

80

490

00

05

54

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

177

717/5

00

00

38

717/4

00

04

88

717/3

00

17

30

717/2

00

05

86

716/1

00

14

29

715

00

09

73

711

00

09

82

713

00

12

66

712

00

29

98

708

00

27

63

707

00

12

01

706

00

13

58

513/6

00

07

43

513/5

00

08

64

513/4

00

04

53

513/3

00

04

38

513/2

00

08

70

513/1

00

09

71

514

00

00

38

518

00

45

72

519/1

00

18

13

520/1

00

34

99

532/1

00

16

70

532/3

00

12

97

178

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

585

00

22

83

586/2

00

16

09

586/1

00

15

12

587/1

00

11

40

587/2

00

16

61

551

00

08

72

555

00

34

66

556/2B

00

03

96

556/2C

00

11

74

556/1

00

15

23

557/3

00

09

90

570

00

36

96

569

00

32

24

568

00

26

38

[F. No. R-11025(11)/252/2017-OR-I/E-21033]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

179

Je ,oa jkstxkj ea=kky;

ubZ fnYyh] 1 tuojh] 2018

dk-vk- 61-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ

vks-,u-th-lh- fyfeVsM ,oa vU; ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 11@2016) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks

dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 19-12-2017 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&30011@39@2015&vkbZvkj (,e)º

Mh- ds- fgeka'kq] voj lfpo

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

New Delhi, the 1st January, 2018

S.O. 61.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 11/2016) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour

Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of M/s. O.N.G.C. Limited and other and their workman, which was received by the Central Government

on 19.12.2017.

[No. L-30011/39/2015-IR (M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 21st November, 2017

Reference: (CGITA) No. 11/2016

1.

The Executive Director – Asset Manager,

ONGC Ltd., Avani Bhavan, 5th Floor, Chandkheda,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

2.

The Incharge (HR - IR),

ONGC Ltd., Avani Bhavan, 5th Floor, Chandkheda,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

3.

The Dy. General Manager (P) ST,

ONGC Ltd., Avani Bhavan, 5th Floor, Chandkheda,

Sabarmati, Ahmedabad

4.

M/s D.B. Enterprises,

G-8, Sukan Mall, Behind Vishat Petrol Pump,

Sabarmati, Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

…First Party

V/s

The President,

Glorious Petroleum Mazdoor Sangh,

A/3, PriyaDarshini Society,Near New Railway Colony,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380019

…Second Party

For the First Party : Shri K.V. Gadhia

For the Second Party : Shri S.N. Gandhi

180

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No.

L-30011/39/2015-IR(M) dated 07.01.2016 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad

(Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of ONGC Ltd., Ahmedabad through its contractor

M/s D.B. Enterprises, Ahmedabad in discontinuing/terminating the services of two workmen Shri Mangaji J.

Yadav w.e.f. 28.04.2015 without following the procedure prescribed under Section 33 of the I.D. Act, 1947

during the pendency of his claim for regularization in services of ONGC Ltd., before CGIT, Ahmedabad and

Shri Pradipkumar S. Nai without following the procedure prescribed under ‘Fair Wage Settlement’ is legal,

proper and justified? If not, to what relief the concerned workmen S/Shri Mangaji J. Yadav and Pradipkumar

S. Nai are entitled to and what directions are necessary in the matter?”

1.

The reference dates back to 07.01.2016.The second party submitted the statement of claim Ex. 2 on 21.04.2016

alleging that the second party union Glorious Petroleum Mazdoor Sangh is a registered union under the trade union act

and both the concerning workmen namely Mangaji J. Yadav and Pradipkumar S. Nai were the members of the

aforesaid union who were working with the first party ONGC Ltd., hereinafter referred to as ONGC through their

respective contractors since more than 25 years. During the tenure of their services, there was no complaint against

them regarding their work and conduct. They have also worked for more than 240 days in each and every calendar

year. It has been further alleged that at the time of impugned action, they were working with the first party No. 4

M/s D.B. Enterprises, hereinafter referred to as M/s D.B. Enterprises, a labour contractor. It has been further alleged

that as per the policy of ONGC whenever there any contractor is changed, list of the contract workers engaged by the

previous contractor has been provided to the new contractor so that the new contractor be mandated to continue with

the contract workmen of the earlier contractor. It has been further alleged that both the workmen worked for more than

25 years as unskilled and skilled operator workers respectively and lastly they have been working with the contractor

namely M/s D.B. Enterprises. It has been further alleged that a criminal complaint was registered against the aforesaid

workmen by the first party under the wrong and false criminal complaint wherein they have been put under suspension

for 1½ months, later it was revoked by an oral order and the workmen were reinstated in their service with continuity of

service and worked for more than 2½ years till 27.04.2015. Thereafter, suddenly on 28.04.2015, both the concerned

workmen received a letter from M/s D.B. Enterprises informing that they are debarred w.e.f. 28.04.2015 from

performing any duty in ONGC till they are proved innocent by the competent court. The second party union submitted

the copy of the aforesaid letters vide Ex. 11/1 and 11/2. It has been further alleged that on 28.04.2015, workmen were

also terminated from the service without giving them any opportunity to defend themselves. No departmental inquiry

was also conducted. It has been further alleged that the workman Mangaji J. Yadav was a protected workman and his

case was pending for regularisation in CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad. The said contention was admitted by the

first party in their letter dated 28.04.2015 Ex. 11/3 and 22.06.2015 Ex. 11/4 submitted before the Assistant

Commissioner of Labour, Central, Ahmedabad. It has been further alleged that the workman Pradeepkumar Nai was

covered under Fair Wage Settlement Scheme providing job security to the contract workmen as per the provisions of

the aforesaid settlement scheme. It was the pre-condition in the aforesaid settlement scheme for the management to

give full opportunity to defend him and to conduct departmental inquiry into the misconduct of the workman and his

services cannot be terminated unless the misconduct is proved. The copy of the settlement scheme is submitted vide

Ex. 15/4. It has been further alleged that no such opportunity of defending himself and conducting departmental inquiry

was done in the matter. It has been further alleged that while terminating their services, the workmen were not paid any

retrenchment compensation or legal dues. Thus the impugned action was violative of Section 25 F, G and H of the I.D.

Act. It has been further alleged that the workmen were subjected to Criminal Trial vid Criminal Case No. 843/2009

before the Judicial Magistrate first class, Gandhinagar who acquitted them in the said case following the charge of theft

vide judgement dated 10.08.2016. The copy of the judgement is at Ex. 12/1 and 12/2.

2.

The first party ONGC filed their written statement Ex. 10 on 19.12.2016 submitted that both the concerned

workmen were contract workmen and their services were terminated by their contractor w.e.f. 28.04.2015 in an alleged

theft case with a condition that till they are not proved innocent by the competent Magistrate, they will not be

re-engaged. Thus their services were not terminated by ONGC. Therefore, no relief can be granted against the ONGC.

3.

The first party No. 4 M/s D.B. Enterprises were served vide notice date 28.09.2017 but M/s D.B. Enterprises did

not prefer to appear and submit the written statement. Thus the case against M/s D.B. Enterprises proceed ex-parte vide

order dated 28.09.2017. Therefore, the second party who earlier submitted their affidavit Ex. 13 and 14 were taken on

record. ONGC cross-examined them wherein both the workmen admitted that they used to work under a contractor

named M/s D.B. Enterprises and they were not given any appointment letter and were also not served with any

termination letter by ONGC.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

181

4.

Thus it is a case wherein no relief can be granted to the workmen against the ONGC.

5.

M/s D.B. Enterprises despite service of notice twice vide Ex. 8 on 18.09.2016, thereafter Ex. 16 on 28.09.2017,

did not prefer to submit his written statement or submissions. The documents Ex. 12/1 and 12/2 clearly establishes that

both the workmen were acquitted for the charge of theft and it is noteworthy that it was the preconditions of the

termination letter Ex. 11/1 and 11/2 that the workmen will not be permitted to perform duties in ONGC unless proved

innocent by the Competent Magistrate and as they have been acquitted by the Competent Magistrate and M/s D.B.

Enterprises has refrained to challenge the reference by submitting written statement, thus this reference can be decided

ex-parte against M/s D.B. Enterprises to engage the aforesaid workmen namely Mangaji J. Yadav and Pradipkumar S.

Nai with immediate effect with all their seniority and other non-monetary benefits.

6.

Thus the reference is disposed of accordingly and the first party no. 4 M/s D.B. Enterprises is directed to

engage/employ the workmen namely Mangaji J. Yadav and Pradipkumar S. Nai immediately as and when they report

to duty as per the terms and conditions said earlier.

7.

The award is passed accordingly.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 1 tuojh] 2018

dk-vk- 62-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ vks-,u-

th-lh- fyfeVsM ,oa vU; ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 50@2012) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh;

ljdkj dks 19-12-2017 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&30011@10@2011&vkbZvkj (,e)º

Mh- ds- fgeka'kq] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 1st January, 2018

S.O. 62.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 50/2012) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour

Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of M/s. O.N.G.C. Limited and others and their workman, which was received by the Central Government

on 19.12.2017.

[No. L-30011/10/2011-IR (M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 06th Decemberr, 2017

Reference: (CGITA) No. 50/2012

1.

The Executive Director,

ONGC Limited,

Ahmedabad Asset, Avani Bhawan,

Chandkheda, Ahmedabad

2.

The Incharge (Security)

ONGC Limited, Avani Bhawan,

Chandkheda, Ahmedabad

3.

The General Manager,

Trig Guard Force Ltd.,

119, Sarjan Tower, Nr. C.G Road,

Chandkheda, Ahmedabad

182

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

4.

M/s. Max Vigil Security Pvt. Ltd.,

42, Astha Avenue, Nr. R.T.O.,

Subhas Bridge Circle, Ahmedabad

…First Party

V/s

Shri C.K. Parmar,

Secretary, Soshit Kamdar Sangh (Gujarat),

521/3372, JayshriLalimaNivas,

Ambika Nagar, Gujarat Housing Board,

Chandkheda, Ahmedabad

…Second Party

For the First Party no’s. 1 & 2

:

Sh. K.V. Gadhia & Sh. M.K. Patel

For the First Party No. 3

:

Absent

For the First Party No. 4

:

Sh. Anil Parikh, Advocate

For the Second Party

:

Sh. C.K. Parmar, Party in Person

AWARD

The Government of India/ Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No.

L- 30011/10/2011-IR(M) dated:14.02.2012 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Central Government Industrial

Tribunal Ahmedabad in respect of the matter specified in the schedule.

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the contractor of ONGC Ltd., Ahmedabad M/s. Max Vigil Security Pvt. Ltd. in

terminating the services of Shri C. K. Parmar (Protected under court order) on the behest of ONGC Ltd.,

Ahmedabad and decategorising him from Security Supervisor to Security Guard and changing his service

condition without following due process of law by the management of ONGC Ltd., Ahmedabad is legal and

justified? What relief the workman is entitled to?"

1.

The reference dates back to 14.02.2012. After the reference by the Appropriate Government, the Court issued

notices vide Ex. 2 to the respective parties and in pursuance to the same, parties to the reference appeared before the

Tribunal and filed their pleadings. The second party filed the Statement of Claims Ex. 7. The ONGC has appeared

through its Advocate and filed its Written Statement vide Ex. 8. The First party No. 3 has chosen not to appear and the

First Party No. 4 appeared through advocate and filed Written Statement vide Ex. 12.

2.

The Second party appeared as a party in person and alleged in his Statement of claim that he had been working

with ONGC under various contractors continuously since 1992 and worked as Security Guard with Opp. No. 3 till

30.06.2010. It is further alleged that he had been serving as a Security Supervisor since Feb. – 2006. But he was

decategorised by the F.P. No. 3 without any rhyme or reason w.e.f. 02.06.2010. It is further alleged that he was then

working with F.P. No. 4 and was illegally terminated. It is also alleged that case of regularization of various workers

was pending before the Ld. Tribunal and that he was a Union leader fighting with the F.P. for the rights of other

employees and therefore he was decategoriseddespite Interim Relief granted by tribunal in their favour in the main

Reference and he was subsequently terminated.Thus the second party has prayed for reinstatement on original post with

continuity in service and has also prayed to declare the action of decategorising him from security supervisor to

security guard as illegal and also prayed for granting the benefits of Security Supervisor from June – 2010. He has also

prayed for declaring the action of the ONGC to change his service condition as illegal and unjust and further prayed for

cost of litigation.

3.

The First Party No. 1 & 2 ONGC has filed it Written statement vide Ex. 8 and denied the averments made in the

statement of claims. The ONGC has stated in true facts that there was no relation of master and servant relationship

between the first party and the second party at any point of time. The ONGC has further stated that as per the Statement

of Claims itself, the second party was decategorised by F.P. No. 3 and terminated by F.P. No. 4 and hence prayed for

rejection of reference qua ONGC. The ONGC has further stated that the reference is barred by principle of res-judicata

as the Complaint No. 05/2011 filed by the second party for the same cause of action was dismissed. Hence it is prayed

to reject the reference.

4.

The First party No. 4 has also filed written statement Ex. 12 and denied the contentions raised in the Statement

of Claims. As far as true facts are concerned, it is stated that the second party was working with them and was

suspended on 01.07.2010 for serious misconducts and was also served with a charge sheet on 30.07.2010. It is further

stated that a departmental inquiry was conducted and sufficient opportunity was given to the second party workman

and inquiry officer submitted his report on 01.09.2010 giving finding that the charges were proved. The second party

was then served with a second show cause notice dtd: - 03.09.2010 on the aforesaid inquiry report and on the point of

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

183

punishment but he did not reply to the said notice, therefore, he was dismissed from service w.e.f. 01.10.2010. Thus in

view of the same, the F.P. No. 3 has prayed for rejection of reference.

5.

The Second party examined himself in the matter and was also cross examined by first party no. 1, 2 & 4. The

first party No. 4 has also examined his witness Mr. Santosh Mojiram Sharma in the matter who was cross examined by

second party and all the first parties. The F.P. No. 4 has produced a list of documents including inquiry report. On the

other hand the second party also filed number of documents in the matter. During the course of proceedings, the second

party has also given various applications/affidavits and also brought on record the previous litigation between the

parties and the orders thereof. The Second party and F.P. No. 4 have given written arguments in the matter while the

Ld. Advocate for the F.P. Nos. 1 & 2 have made oral submissions in the matter.

6.

Considering the materials and evidences on record, the submissions of the parties and the terms of reference as

formed by the appropriate government, the issues that fall for consideration are:

I.

Whether the termination of the Second Party by the Contractor M/s. Max Vigil Security Pvt. Ltd. is legal

and justified?

II.

Whether the action of ONGC in decategorising the second party from Security Supervisor to Security

guard is legal and justified?

III.

If not, what relief the second party is entitled to?

6.1

Issue I

The burden of proof of this issues lies on second party, workman. From the terms of reference, the pleadings of

the second party in the statement of claims and thereafter as well as pleadings of the ONGC and the contractor, one

thing that is clear is that the second party was working with the F.P. No. – 4 herein. Hence, there was a relation of

master and servant between the second party and the F.P. No.4. Secondly, the fact that the second party is terminated is

also an admitted fact. What is required to be determined here is whether, the said termination is just and legal. In this

connection, the second party has stated that he was terminated on 01.07.2010 without following the due process of law.

As against this, the witness of F.P. No. 4 Mr. Santosh Mojiram Sharma stated that he was suspended on 01.07.2010 and

terminated on 01.10.2010 after a departmental inquiry. The second party has appeared as a party in person and has not

taken assistance of any legal counsel in the matter. The F.P. No. 4 has also produced the inquiry proceedings on record

to support its case. However, what is borne out from the record is that the F.P. No. 4 has not paid

suspension/subsistence allowance to the second party during the pendency of the inquiry. Moreover, the inquiry was for

most of the time conducted in absence of the second party. The list of witnesses relied upon by the management was

also not provided to the second party. Moreover, the first date of inquiry was kept on 13.08.2010 for which notice was

issued on 09.08.2010. The second party on that day gave an application for change in venue of the proceedings. Now

this Tribunal cannot decide the venue of the proceedings as it is the discretion of the management alone. However,

without deciding the same, the inquiry officer in no time fixed another date of the proceedings at the same place on

18.08.2010. The Second party again did not remain present. On that day, the witnesses of the management were

examined. The proceedings are then postponed to 27.08.2010. The second party again chose not to remain present and

therefore the inquiry proceeding was concluded on the said date. The Inquiry officer has then on 01.09.2010 submitted

inquiry report. Subsequent thereto on 03.09.2010 itself, the management has given a second show cause notice to the

second party and directed him to reply to the same within 72 hours on why he should not be dismissed failing which

management will take proposed action against him. Thus it is clear from the above dates and proceedings that the

inquiry was conducted in a hasty manner and decision of dismissal was also taken in haste. This Tribunal is aware of

the fact that the charges are serious in nature wherein the second party has not only abused a superior but also damaged

Government property and left without any permission or authorization. However, the principles of natural justice

demand that the delinquent be given sufficient opportunity to disprove the charges and prove his innocence. The

management has already framed the charges and communicated the same on 30.07.2010 to the second party. The same

was not replied by the second party and hence inquiry proceedings were initiated. Thus, this Tribunal is of the opinion

that the Second party may be given a chance to reply to the charge sheet and the management may then take a decision

on whether to initiate inquiry or not. If the management decides to initiate the inquiry then the second party may be

given reasonable opportunity to defend himself. The management may provide the list of witnesses and documents that

may be relied upon before hand to the second party and the same is expected from the second party. On conclusion of

the inquiry proceedings, reasonable time may be granted to both the sides to submit their briefs and then again to

counter the findings of the inquiry officer and further notice, if any. In nut shell, the entire process from the point of

reply to the charge sheet is required to be done afresh. Considering the peculiar facts of the case, as well as the fact that

the second party appeared as party-in-person and also considering the fact that the first inquiry was conducted virtually

in ex-parte manner against the second party workman.

184

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

The apex court in Brijbihari Singh V/s Bihar State Financial Corporation, 216(1) CLR 344, held that it is a well

settled principle of law where a person/employee was required to answer charges labeled against him should know not

only the acquisition against him but also the testimony of the witnesses by which the charges were alleged to be

proved. The departure from the aforesaid requirements of principles of law definitely violates the principles of natural

justice and therefore, the inquiry held against the delinquent employee is vitiated.

Thus it will be in fitness of things, if the said exercise is carried out in house as far as the present issue is

concerned. It is needless to clarify here that any order passed will be subject to rights of the parties to challenge it

before the appropriate forum. If the management sticks to its earlier decision, then the question of intervening period

will not be of much consequence. However, if the relief is granted, then the disciplinary authority may modify the

punishment accordingly.

6.2

Issue II

As far as the present issue is concerned, from the statement of claims itself, it is clear that the second party was

earlier working with the F.P. No. 3 and he was decategorised from security supervisor to security guard by the said

party. Moreover, the ONGC has also contended that the second party was never appointed by them. The terms of

reference are that whether the action of the ONGC in decategorising the second party is just and legal or not. However,

from the pleadings of the second party himself, it is clear that he was decategorised by F.P. No. 3 and not ONGC.

Moreover, the Tribunal cannot traverse beyond the terms of reference. Thus no relief can be granted to the second party

against ONGC in the present issue.

7.

In view of the above, the matter is sent back to the Disciplinary Authority to proceed fresh inquiry and pass a

reasoned order after giving full opportunity of hearing to the workman as held by the Hon'ble Apex Court in case of

Brij Bihar Singh Vs. Bihar State financial Corporation & Ors. reported in 2016 I CLR 344.

8.

The F.P. No. 4 will also be required to pay subsistence allowance from the date of commence of fresh

departmental proceedings to till the date of final order if any, to be passed by the F.P. No. 4. Thus the reference is

disposed off with above observations.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 1 tuojh] 2018

dk-vk- 63-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ vks-,u-

th-lh- fyfeVsM ,oa vU; ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 67@2010) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh;

ljdkj dks 19-12-2017 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&30011@8@2009&vkbZvkj (,e)º

Mh- ds- fgeka'kq] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 1st January, 2018

S.O. 63.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 67/2010) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour

Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of M/s. O.N.G.C. Limited and other and their workman, which was received by the Central Government

on 19.12.2017.

[No. L-30011/8/2009-IR (M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 20th November, 2017

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

185

Reference: (CGITA) No. 67/2010

1.

The Asset Manager,

ONGC Ltd., Ankleshwar Asset,

Ankleshwar (Gujarat)

2.

The Chief Manager (Security),

ONGC Ltd.,

Ankleshwar

3.

M/s Tops Security Ltd.,

C-I, Hariom Shopping, Nr. Overbridge,

Opp. Jublee Guest House, Old National Highway,

Ankleshwar

…First Party

V/s

The General Secretary,

ONG Mazdoor Sangh, ONGC Office,

Ankleshwar (Gujarat)

…Second Party

For the First Party :

Shri C.S. Naidu

For the Second Party :

Shri A.N. Patel

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-30011/8/2009-

IR(M) dated 29.07.2009 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect

of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“The Security Section of ONGC is a “registered establishment” under the Contract Labour (R&A) Act, 1970

and the Contractor had obtained prescribed Labour License under the Act. Hence the dispute raised is not

maintainable.”

1.

The reference dates back to 29.07.2009. The second party submitted the statement of claim Ex. 8 on 03.04.2010

and the first party submitted the written statement Ex. 16 on 21.04.2010 along with vakalatpatra Ex. 17 of his advocate.

2.

Since then the second party union did not lead evidence; however on 05.11.2015, The General Secretary,

R.H. Pathan ONG Mazdoor Sangh moved an application Ex. 33 for withdrawal from the reference of 165 workmen

named in the application.

3.

Since then the second party union has been absent and has not been leading evidence.

4.

Thus it appears that the second party union is not willing to prosecute and pursue the matter. Thus the reference

is disposed of in the absence of the evidence of the second party workman.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 1 tuojh] 2018

dk-vk- 64-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ VkVk

dsfedYl fyfeVsM ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 101@2010) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

19-12-2017 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&29012@82@2008&vkbZvkj (,e)º

Mh- ds- fgeka'kq] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 1st January, 2018

S.O. 64.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 101/2010) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour

Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of M/s. Tata Chemicals Limited and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on

19.12.2017.

[No. L-29012/82/2008-IR (M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

186

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 23rd November, 2017

Reference: (CGITA) No. 101/2010

The Manager,

Tata Chemicals Limited,

Ranavav Quarry Office, Ranavav,

Porbandar (Gujarat)

…First Party

V/s

Shri Laxman Devshi Bhuva,

Navapara, Adityana,

Ranavav,

Porbandar (Gujarat)

…Second Party

For the First Party : Shri P.S. Gogia

For the Second Party : Shri Ramsingh Thakor

AWARD

The

Government

of

India/Ministry

of

Labour,

New

Delhi

by

reference

adjudication

Order

No.

L-29012/82/2008-IR(M) dated 16.09.2008 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad

(Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the Manager (Mines)/Mine Agent of M/s Tata Chemicals Limited, Ranavav in not

providing employment to Shri Laxman Devshi Bhuva, Ex-workman after 01.10.2006 and whether his

termination is legal and justified? What relief the workman is entitled to?”

1.

The reference dates back to 16.09.2008. Both the parties submitted and exchanged their statement of claim and

written statement along with relevant documents. The reference was fixed for evidence of the second party but today on

23.11.2017, both the parties jointly submitted a settlement Ex. 15 stating that the first party has agreed to pay

Rs.1278000/- to the workman subject to deduction of taxes. It has also been said that the payment has been made to the

workman. The settlement was read over to the parties and the parties verified the settlement of the award.

2.

Thus the reference is finally disposed of in terms of the settlement Ex. 15. The settlement Ex. 15 shall be part of

the award.

3.

The award is passed accordingly.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 1 tuojh] 2018

dk-vk- 65-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ VkVk

dsfedYl fyfeVsM ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 105@2010) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

19-12-2017 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&29012@81@2008&vkbZvkj (,e)º

Mh- ds- fgeka'kq] voj lfpo

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

187

New Delhi, the 1st January, 2018

S.O. 65.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 105/2010) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour

Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of M/s. Tata Chemicals Limited and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on

19.12.2017.

[No. L-29012/81/2008-IR (M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 23rd November, 2017

Reference: (CGITA) No. 105/2010

The Manager,

Tata Chemicals Limited,

Ranavav Quarry Office, Ranavav,

Porbandar (Gujarat)

…First Party

V/s

Shri Mohan Kana Borichiya,

Ganesh Oil Centre, Opp. Post Office Station Plot,

Ranavav -2,

Porbandar (Gujarat)

…Second Party

For the First Party : Shri P.S. Gogia

For the Second Party : Shri RamsinghThakor

AWARD

The

Government

of

India/Ministry

of

Labour,

New

Delhi

by

reference

adjudication

Order

No. L-29012/81/2008-IR(M) dated 16.09.2008 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the Manager (Mines)/Mine Agent of M/s Tata Chemicals Limited, Ranavav in not

providing employment to Shri Mohan Kana Borichiya, Ex-workman after 01.10.2006 and whether his

termination is legal and justified? What relief the workman is entitled to?”

1.

The reference dates back to 16.09.2008. Both the parties submitted and exchanged their statement of claim and

written statement along with relevant documents. The reference was fixed for evidence of the second party but today on

23.11.2017, both the parties jointly submitted a settlement Ex. 16 stating that the first party has agreed to pay

Rs.1278000/- to the workman subject to deduction of taxes. It has also been said that the payment has been made to the

workman. The settlement was read over to the parties and the parties verified the settlement of the award.

2.

Thus the reference is finally disposed of in terms of the settlement Ex. 16. The settlement Ex. 16 shall be part of

the award.

3.

The award is passed accordingly.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 1 tuojh] 2018

dk-vk- 66-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ VkVk

dsfedYl fyfeVsM ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

188

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 113@2010) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

19-12-2017 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&29012@80@2008&vkbZvkj (,e)º

Mh- ds- fgeka'kq] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 1st January, 2018

S.O. 66.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 113/2010) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour

Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of M/s. Tata Chemicals Limited and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on

19.12.2017.

[No. L-29012/80/2008-IR (M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 23rd November, 2017

Reference: (CGITA) No. 113/2010

The Manager,

Tata Chemicals Limited,

Ranavav Quarry Office, Ranavav,

Porbandar (Gujarat)

…First Party

V/s

Shri Ali Suleman Ghavda,

Behind Patel Samaj,

Adityana,Ranavav,

Porbandar (Gujarat)

…Second Party

For the First Party : Shri P.S. Gogia

For the Second Party : Shri Ramsingh Thakor

AWARD

The

Government

of

India/Ministry

of

Labour,

New

Delhi

by

reference

adjudication

Order

No. L-29012/80/2008-IR(M) dated 16.09.2008 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the Manager (Mines)/Mine Agent of M/s Tata Chemicals Limited, Ranavav in not

providing employment to Shri Ali Suleman Ghavda, Ex-workman after 01.10.2006 and whether his

termination is legal and justified? What relief the workman is entitled to?”

1.

The reference dates back to 16.09.2008. Both the parties submitted and exchanged their statement of claim and

written statement along with relevant documents. The reference was fixed for evidence of the second party but today on

23.11.2017, both the parties jointly submitted a settlement Ex. 16 stating that the first party has agreed to pay

Rs.1278000/- to the workman subject to deduction of taxes. It has also been said that the payment has been made to the

workman. The settlement was read over to the parties and the parties verified the settlement of the award.

2.

Thus the reference is finally disposed of in terms of the settlement Ex. 16. The settlement Ex. 16 shall be part of

the award.

3.

The award is passed accordingly.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

189

ubZ fnYyh] 1 tuojh] 2018

dk-vk- 67-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ

Mh-ch-lh- lUl (xqtjkr) izkbosV fyfeVsM ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd

fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 531@2004) dks çdkf'kr djrh

gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 19-12-2017 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&37011@17@2002&vkbZvkj (,e)º

Mh- ds- fgeka'kq] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 1st January, 2018

S.O. 67.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 531/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour

Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of M/s. D.B.C. Sons (Guj.) Pvt. Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government

on 19.12.2017.

[No. L-37011/17/2002-IR (M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 21st November, 2017

Reference: (CGITA) No. 531/2004

The Managing Director,

M/s Darabshaw B. Cursetjee Sons (Bom) Pvt. Ltd.,

Darabshaw House, Ballard Pier,

Mumbai – 400010

…First Party

V/s

Shri N.K. Sharma,

S.D.X. – 50, Kutch,

Gandhidham (Gujarat) – 370201

…Second Party

For the First Party : Shri L.M. Patil

For the Second Party : Shri D.C. Gandhi

AWARD

The

Government

of

India/Ministry

of

Labour,

New

Delhi

by

reference

adjudication

Order

No. L-37011/17/2002-IR(M) dated 10.12.2002 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of M/s D.B.C’s Sons (Guj.) Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai not to allow on duty

after transfer either at Kakinada or at Kandla presuming that he was left the service on his own is justified or

legal? If not, what relief the workman is entitled for and since when?”

190

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1.

The reference dates back to 10.12.2002. After issuing notice to both the parties, neither of the parties appeared,

therefore, Industrial Tribunal, Gujarat vide order dated 10.01.2005 dismissed the reference for non-appearance of the

parties.

2.

Thereafter, the second party workman moved a Misc. Application No. 07/2009 after a period of 2 years for

restoration of the reference and the Industrial Tribunal, Gujarat restored the reference to its original no. for adjudication

and issued the notice to the first party which was received by the first party on 13.09.2012.

3.

The second party workman submitted the statement of claim Ex. 13 on 23.08.2012 alleging that he was

appointed as a temporary employee on the post of Dock Assistant by the first party The Managing Director,

M/s Darabshaw B. Cursetjee Sons (Bom) Pvt. Ltd., Darabshaw House, Ballard Pier, Mumbai, hereinafter referred to as

first party vide order dated 30.04.1985 for a period of 6 months’ probation w.e.f. 01.05.1985 with a monthly salary of

Rs.450/- and he was made permanent vide order dated 29.03.1986 w.e.f. 01.04.1986 with a total salary of Rs.5500/- in

the grade of permanent service. He served his duties with honesty and diligence at first party office as Gandhidham.

During his whole service, he was not showed any show-cause notice, memo, rebuke or charge-sheet. On account of his

good and honest service, he was giving 3 special increments with a commendation certificate. Suddenly on 21.06.2001,

he was transferred Gandhidham Gujarat to Kakinada Andhra Pradesh. He apprised the first party by way of serving a

letter regarding his financial, social conditions and also problems of minor child and wife’s illness being suffering with

kidney ailment but the first party did not consider his case of change of transfer, therefore, he booked a railway ticket

on 08.08.2001 to be present at Kakinada. After reaching Kakinada, he was not permitted to join, so he informed the

Labour Commissioner at Kakinada regarding this but those officers did not take cognizance into the matter. He was not

subjected to any departmental inquiry and suddenly his services were terminated for not joining at the transfer place.

While terminating his services, he was not given any show-cause notice, retrenchment compensation. Thus the action

was violative of the provisions of Section 25 F, G and H of the I.D. Act. Thus he has prayed for declaring the

termination order as illegal, reinstatement of service along with service benefits with legal expenses of Rs. 10000/-.

4.

The first party in his written statement Ex. 15 filed on 18.10.2012 admitted the service appointment of second

party workman on probation, thereafter, as a permanent employee but further submitted that the first party did not

terminate the services of the second party workman and as per the transfer orders issued by the first party; he was

transferred from Gandhidham to Kakinada. He reported to duty at transferred place and thereafter, all of a sudden, he

refused to work at the transferred place and started to send representations mentioning seek reports and his wife’s

ailment. He has also submitted that this tribunal has no jurisdiction to entertain the reference on the ground that the

initial appointment letter as a probationer as well as a permanent employee issued to the workman clearly indicated that

transfer will be the condition of his service and after making his transfer to Kakinada, the workman admitted that he

resume duty at Kakinada and thereafter, he stopped working there. Thus the jurisdiction lies in the Central Government

Industrial Tribunal situated in Andhra Pradesh. It has been further submitted that the entire reference is misconceived,

legally not tenable as transferring a workman/employee which was a service condition in the appointment letter, cannot

also be entertained as an Industrial Dispute.

5.

On the basis of the pleadings, the following issues arise:

i.

Whether the action of the management of M/s D.B.C’s Sons (Guj.) Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai not to allow on

duty after transfer either at Kakinada or at Kandla presuming that he was left the service on his own is

justified or legal?

ii.

To what relief, if any, the workman is entitled for and since when?

6.

As both the issues are interconnected, therefore both these issues are discussed and decided together.

7.

Issue no. (i & ii): The burden to prove this issue was lying on the second party workman and the second party

workman in his affidavit Ex. 16 filed on 28.11.2013 and in his cross-examination, he has admitted that his date of birth

is 17.12.1949 with a matric qualification and also admitted that he was transferred to Kakinada vide order dated

20.06.2001, he reached Kakinada after staying for 10 to 15 days at Gandhidham requesting for cancellation of transfer.

He further admitted in his cross-examination that he stayed in Kakinada for a month and came back to Gandhidham.

Thereafter, he did not turn up at Kakinada.

8.

The first party examined Baltazar Fernandez, Senior Manager, vide affidavit Ex. 19 who reiterated the

averments made in the written statement and stated in his cross-examination which is as under:

“I have been working as Senior Manager, Finance and Accounts since last 25 years. I am aware of all the facts

relating to this case. The workman N.K. Sharma has been a regular employee of first party. The workman was

Dock Assistant in the first party organisation. We used to transfer the workman from one branch to another

branch of the organisation. Our office is based at Kandla Port. It is true that since joining the workman

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

191

continued his service at Kandla Port Branch of first party organisation. The workman was transferred on

21.06.2001 from Kandla Branch to Kakinada Branch of the first party organisation. He was relieved with

immediate effect.

The workman moved a representation for cancellation of his transfer order on the ground that his wife was well

and long sick. The representation was annexed with the medical certificate regarding Kidney disease.

The workman despite representation for cancellation of transfer, joined at Kakinada on 08.08.2001. But we did

not permit him to join and also did not initiate any disciplinary proceeding against the workman for not joining

with in time provided in the transfer order.

No action was taken against the officer who has not permitted the workman to join at Kakinada despite the fact

that the workman’s wife was suffering with Kidney disease.

It is true that the workman moved number of complaints to Collector of the District and other higher authorities

regarding denying him to join at Kakinada. It is true that the workman is stayed at Kakinada for 15 days but

even then he was not permitted to join. No termination order was served on him. No notice or notice pay was

given to the workman. The superannuation age in the first party organisation is 58 years, till date no service or

legal dues are paid to him.”

9.

From the evidence of both the parties, it can be concluded that the service of the workman was transferrable and

he was transferred as per the terms and condition of the service despite the admitted fact that his wife was suffering

with renal ailment. Workman joined at Kakinada, therefore, it cannot be disputed that the jurisdiction in this dispute

was lying in the State of Andhra Pradesh, therefore, in the Central Government Industrial Tribunal situated in the state

of Andhra Pradesh. But the case of the workman appears to be inhumane on the part of the first party that despite the

renal ailment of the workman’s wife, he was deliberately transferred to Kakinada which is against the labour practice

and inhumane. Thus transferred made out of a vengeance can be said to be an Industrial Dispute which existed at

Gandhidham in Gujarat. It is also noteworthy that the first party witness has admitted that no legal dues or benefits

have been paid to him.

10.

Therefore, in the light of the aforesaid discussions, it can be said that the jurisdiction lies at both the places that

is Gandhidham as well as Kakinada because the workman was transferred out of vengeance without considering the

real ailment of the workman’s wife but as admitted by the workman that he was born on 17.12.1949, therefore, passed

the superannuation age, therefore, he cannot be ordered to be reinstated and he can also not be paid arrears of wages for

the period of absence on the principle of ‘no work no pay’.

11.

Thus both the issues (i & ii) are decided with a direction that the second party workman shall be paid a lump-

sum of Rs. 40000/- as compensation along with Rs. 10000/- as legal expenses.

12.

The award is passed accordingly.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 1 tuojh] 2018

dk-vk- 68-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ vks-,u-

th-lh- fyfeVsM ,oa vU; ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 734@2004) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh;

ljdkj dks 19-12-2017 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&30011@67@2001&vkbZvkj (,e)º

Mh- ds- fgeka'kq] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 1st January, 2018

S.O. 68.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 734/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour

Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of M/s. O.N.G.C. Limited and other and their workman, which was received by the Central Government

on 19.12.2017.

[No. L-30011/67/2001-IR (M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

192

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 28th November, 2017

Reference: (CGITA) No. 734/2004

1.

The Group General Manager (Project),

ONGC Ltd., Ankleshwar Project,

Ankleshwar (Gujarat) – 393010

2.

M/s Yasodeep and Company,

F-32, Raviraj Complex, Nr. Valia Chokdi,

Bharuch (Gujarat) – 393010

…First Party

V/s

The General Secretary,

ONG Mazdoor Sangh C/o Bhartiya Mazdoor Sangh,

Nr. Asian Paint Chokdi, GIDC,

Ankleshwar (Gujarat)

…Second Party

For the First Party : Shri C.S. Naidu

For the Second Party : Shri Amrish Patel

AWARD

The

Government

of

India/Ministry

of

Labour,

New

Delhi

by

reference

adjudication

Order

No. L-30011/67/2001-IR(M) dated 04.07.2001 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the demand of the union to absorb/regularize the services of Shri Raj Yogendra Sinh Balwant Sinh

& 13 others as permanent and direct employee of ONGC Ltd., Ankleshwar from the date of their entry in the

service as contractual workmen and all other benefits as enjoyed as the regular employees of the ONGC Ltd.,

is legal, proper and justified? If so, to what relief the concerned workmen are entitled to and from which date

and what other directions are necessary in the matter?”

1.

The reference dates back to 04.07.2001. The second party submitted the statement of claim Ex. 7 on 15.02.2002

and the first party submitted the written statement Ex. 14 on 05.05.2002. The workmen namely Mohd Rafik Hussain

Shaikh and Mohd Rafik Bdul Karim Shaikh vide Ex. 53 on 11.01.2016 and the workmen namely Raj Yogendrasinh

Balvantsinh, Patel Narsangbhai Bhikhabhai, Chasatiya Sandipsinh Prabhatsinh and Vasava Naginbhai Parsottambhai

vide Ex. 55 on 30.06.2016, requested to withdraw from the reference by deleting their names. The said applications

were allowed. Since then the remaining workmen or the union has been absent and have not been leading evidence.

Thus it appears that the remaining workmen or the union are not willing to prosecute the reference.

2.

Thus the reference in the absence of the evidence of the second party, is disposed of with the observation as

under: “the demand of the union to absorb/regularize the services of remaining 8 workmen as permanent and direct

employee of ONGC Ltd., Ankleshwar from the date of their entry in the service as contractual workmen and all other

benefits as enjoyed as the regular employees of the ONGC Ltd., is illegal, improper and unjustified.’’

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 1 tuojh] 2018

dk-vk- 69-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ vks-,u-

th-lh- fyfeVsM ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

193

vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 767@2004) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

19-12-2017 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&30011@57@2001&vkbZvkj (,e)º

Mh- ds- fgeka'kq] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 1st January, 2018

S.O. 69.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 767/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour

Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of M/s. O.N.G.C. Limited and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on

19.12.2017.

[No. L-30011/57/2001-IR (M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 28th November, 2017

Reference: (CGITA) No. 767/2004

The Group General Manager (Project),

ONGC Ltd., Ankleshwar Project,

Ankleshwar(Gujarat) – 393010

…First Party

V/s

The President,

All Gujarat State Kamdar Union,

Khadki Faliya, At Vav, Post Kadodara, Taluka Vagra,

Bharuch (Gujarat)

…Second Party

For the First Party : Shri C.S. Naidu

For the Second Party : Shri Amrish Patel

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No.

L-30011/57/2001-IR(M) dated 13.11.2001 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad

(Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of ONGC Ltd., Ankleshwar Project, Ankleshwar in not considering

the demand of Shri Gohil Bharatbhai G. and 30 other workmen for absorption and regularisation is justified? If

not, to what relief the concerned workman is entitled?”

1.

The reference dates back to 13.11.2001.The second party submitted the statement of claim Ex. 5 on 21.04.2004

and the first party submitted the written statement Ex. 17 on 03.10.2017. The workmen namely Rameshbhai

Bheemsang Patel, Chatrsangbhai Ranchodbhai Patel, Fuljibhai Bahecharbhai Limbachia, Ganpat MahijiJadav,

Ashokbhai N. Solanki and Gohil Vinubhai Ranchhodbhai, vide Ex. 9 on 28.03.2016, the workman Suleman Umerji

Patel vide Ex. 12 on 21.06.2016 and the workman Ismail Vali Patel vide Ex. 15 on 29.06.2016, requested to withdraw

from the reference by deleting their names. The said applications were allowed. Since then the remaining workmen or

the union has been absent and have not been leading evidence. Thus it appears that the remaining workmen or the

union are not willing to prosecute the reference.

194

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2.

Thus the reference in the absence of the evidence of the second party, is disposed of with the observation as

under: “the action of the management of ONGC Ltd., Ankleshwar Project, Ankleshwar in not considering the demand

of Shri Gohil Bharatbhai G. and remaining 22 other workmen for absorption and regularisation is justified.”

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 1 tuojh] 2018

dk-vk- 70-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ xqtjkr

vEcqtk lhesaV fyfeVsM ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 1004@2004) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh;

ljdkj dks 19-12-2017 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&29012@51@1994&vkbZvkj (,e)º

Mh- ds- fgeka'kq] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 1st January, 2018

S.O. 70.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 1004/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour

Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of M/s. Gujarat Ambuja Cement Limited and their workman, which was received by the Central

Government on 19.12.2017.

[No. L-29012/51/1994-IR (M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 21st November, 2017

Reference: (CGITA) No. 1004/2004

The Dy. Manager (Personnel),

M/s Gujarat Ambuja Cements Ltd.,

Ambujanagar, P.O. Kodinar,

Amreli – 362720

…First Party

V/s

Shri B.N. Khan,

C/o Bhartiya Mazdoor Sangh,

Gayatri Rajaputpara Main Road,

Lodhwad Police Station,

Rajkot (Gujarat) -360001

…Second Party

For the First Party

:

Shri A.S. Parikh

For the Second Party

:

None

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-29012/51/94-

IR(M) dated 27.03.1996 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect

of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of M/s Gujarat Ambuja Cements Ltd. in terminating the services of

Shri B.N. Khan is justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled?”

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

195

1.

The reference dates back to 27.03.1996. The second party submitted the statement of claim Ex. 4 on 15.02.1997

and the first party submitted the written statement Ex. 5 on 08.12.1997. Since then the second party has not leading

evidence, therefore, on 21.03.2011, fresh notice was issued to both the parties to lead evidence but the second party

neither appeared nor lead his evidence, however, the advocate of the second party appeared and submitted the

vakalatpatra Ex. 13 on 27.01.2012.

2.

Thus it appears that the second party workman is not willing to prosecute and pursue the matter.

3.

Thus the reference is disposed of in the absence of the evidence of the second party workman with the

observation as under: ‘‘the action of the management of M/s Gujarat Ambuja Cements Ltd. in terminating the services

of Shri B.N. Khan is justified.”

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 1 tuojh] 2018

dk-vk- 71-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ xqtjkr

lh/h lhesUV fyfeVsM ,oa vU; ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 1134@2004) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks

dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 19-12-2017 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&29011@9@1998&vkbZvkj (,e)º

Mh- ds- fgeka'kq] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 1st January, 2018

S.O. 71.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 1134/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour

Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of M/s. Gujarat Sidhee Cement Ltd. and others and their workman, which was received by the Central

Government on 19.12.2017.

[No. L-29011/9/1998-IR (M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 30th November, 2017

Reference: (CGITA) No. 1134/2004

1.

The Director (Works),

Gujarat Sidhee Cements Ltd.,

Veraval Kodinar Highway, Sidheegram, Veraval,

Junagadh (Gujarat) – 362276

2.

M/s Kavita Constructions Pvt. Ltd.,

Deevanodi Naharmagra,Udaipur

3.

M/s A.M. Enterprises,

C/o Gujarat Sidhee Cements Ltd.,

Sidhi Gram, Junagadh (Gujarat)

…First Party

196

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

V/s

The Secretary,

Shree Junagadh Jilla Mazdoor Sangh,

Ridhi Sidhi Apartment, Office No. 6/7, 2nd Floor,

Veraval (Gujarat)

…Second Party

For the First Party

:

Shri P.S. Gogia

For the Second Party

:

Shri L.M. Patil

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-29011/9/98-

IR(M) dated 29.06.1998 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect

of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of M/s Gujarat Sidhee Cements Ltd., and Contractor M/s A.M.

Enterprises in terminating the service of 104 employees working in packing plant w.e.f. 12.12.1997 is

justified? If not, to what relief these workmen are entitled to?”

1.

The reference dates back to 29.06.1998. Both the parties submitted their statement of claim and written

statement as the case may be. But on 30.11.2017, both the parties submitted the settlement Ex. 23 for withdrawing the

reference unconditionally.

2.

Thus the reference is disposed of as withdrawn.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

नई द ली, 3 जनवरी, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 72

72

72

72.—के ीय सरकार, कमचारी राय बीमा अिधिनयम, 1948 (1948 का 34) क धारा 91-क के साथ पठत धारा

88 ारा द! शि#य$ का योग करते 'ए एत)ारा िभलाई * टील , लांट, सेल के कारखान$/*थापना0 के िनयिमत कमचारय$ को इस

अिधिनयम के वतन से छूट दान करती है। यह छूट, यह अिधसूचना जारी होने क तारीख से एक वष क अविध के िलए लागू रहेगी ।

2.

उ# छूट िन;िलिखत शत< के अधीन है; अथात्:-

(1) पूव># *थापना िजसम? कमचारी िनयोिजत ह@, एक रिज*टर रखेगी, िजसम? छूट ाA कमचारय$ के नाम और पदनाम

दखाये जाय?गे;

(2)

इस छूट के होते 'ए भी, कमचारी उ# अिधिनयम के अधीन ऐसी सुिवधाएं ाA करते रह?गे िजनको पाने के िलए वे इस

अिधसूचना ारा दी गई छूट के वृ! होने क तारीख से पूव संद! अंशदान$ के आधार पर हकदार हो जाते ह@;

(3)

छूट ाA अविध के िलए, यद कोई अिभदाय पहले ही कए जा चुके ह$, तो वे वापस नहH कए जाएंगे;

(4)

उ# कारखाने/*थापना का िनयोजक उस अविध क बाबत िजसके दौरान उस कारखाने/*थापना पर उ# अिधिनयम

(िजसे इसम? इसके पJात् उ# अविध कहा गया है) वतमान था ऐसी िववरिणयां, ऐसे ाMप म? और ऐसी िविशिNय$

सिहत देगा जो कमचारी राय बीमा (साधारण) िविनयम, 1950 के अधीन उसे उ# अविध क बाबत देनी अपेिOत

होती थH;

(5)

िनगम ारा उ# कमचारी राय बीमा अिधिनयम क धारा 45 क उप-धारा (1) के अधीन िनयु# कया गया कोई

िनरीOक या िनगम का इस िनिम! ािधकृत कोई अ य पदधारी;

(i) धारा 44 क उप-धारा (1) के अधीन, उ# अविध क बाबत दी गई कसी िववरण क िविशNय$ को सPयािपत

करने के योजनाथ; अथवा

(ii) यह अिभिनिJत करने के योजनाथ क कमचारी राय बीमा (साधारण) िविनयम, 1950 ारा यथाअपेिOत

रिज*टर और अिभलेख उ# अविध के िलए रखे गये थे या नहH; या

(iii) यह अिभिनिJत करने के योजनाथ क कमचारी, िनयोजक ारा दये गए उन फायद$ को, िजसके फल*वMप इस

अिधसूचना के अधीन छूट दी जा रही है, नकद म? और व*तु Mप म? पाने का हकदार बना 'आ है या नहH; या

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

197

(iv) यह अिभिनिJत करने के योजनाथ क उस अविध के दौरान, जब उ# कारखाने के संबंध म? अिधिनयम के उपबंध

वृ! थे, ऐसे क हH उपबंध$ का अनुपालन कया गया था या नहH, िन;िलिखत काय करने के िलए सश# होगा:-

(क) धान या आसR िनयोजक से अपेOा करना क वह उसे ऐसी जानकारी दे िजसे उपरो# िनरीOक या अ य

पदधारी आवSयक समझता है ; अथवा

(ख) ऐसे धान या आसR िनयोजक के अिधभोगाधीन, कसी कारखाने, *थापना, कायालय या अ य परसर म?

कसी भी उिचत समय पर वेश करना और उसके भारी से यह अपेOा करना क वह Uि#य$ के

िनयोजन और मजदूरी के संदाय से संबंिधत ऐसे लेखा, बिहयां और अ य द*तावेज, ऐसे िनरीOक या अ य

पदधारी के समO *तुत कर? और उनक परीOा करने द? या ऐसी जानकारी द? िजसे वे आवSयक समझते ह@;

या

(ग)

धान या आसR िनयोजक क, उसके अिभकता या सेवक क, या ऐसे कसी Uि# को, जो ऐसे कारखाने,

*थापना, कायालय या अ य परसर म? पाया जाए, यह िवVास करने का युि#यु# कारण है क वह

कमचारी है, परीOा करना; या

(घ)

ऐसे कारखाने, *थापना, कायालय या अ य परसर म? रखे गए कसी रिज*टर, लेखा, बही या अ य

द*तावेज क नकल तैयार करना या उWरण लेना;

(ङ)

यथािनधारत अ य शि#य$ का योग करना ।

(6)

िविनवेश/िनगमीकरण के मामले म?, द! छूट *वत: रX हो जाएगी और तब नए ितYान को छूट हेतु समुिचत सरकार

क अनुमित लेनी होगी।

[सं. एस-38014/07/2013-एस.एस.-I]

एस. के. Zसंह, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 3rd January, 2018

S.O. 72.—In exercise of the power conferred by Section 88 read with Section 91-A of the Employees’ State

Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948) the Central Government hereby exempts the regular employees/trainees of

factories/establishments of Bhilai Steel Plant of SAIL from the operation of the said Act. The exemption shall be

effective for a period of one year from the date of issue of notification.

2.

The above exemption is subject to the following conditions namely:-

(1)

The aforesaid establishments wherein the employees are employed shall maintain a register showing the

name and designations of the exempted employees’;

(2)

Notwithstanding this exemption, the employees shall continue to receive such benefits under the said Act

to which they might have become entitled to on the basis of the contributions paid prior to the date from

which exemption granted by this notification operates;

(3)

The contributions for the exempted period, if already paid, shall not be refundable;

(4)

The employer of the said factory/establishment shall submit in respect of the period during which that

factory was subject to the operation of the said Act (hereinafter referred as the said period), such returns

in such forms and containing such particulars as were due from it in respect of the said period under the

Employees’ State Insurance (General) Regulations, 1950;

(5)

Any Social Security Officer appointed by the Corporation under Sub-Section (1) of Section 45 of the said

ESI Act or other official of the Corporation authorized in this behalf by it, shall, for the purpose of :-

(i)

Verifying the particulars contained in any returned submitted under sub-section (1) of section 44

for the said period; or

(ii)

Ascertaining whether registers and records were maintained as required by the Employees’ State

Insurance (General) Regulations, 1950 for the said period; or

(iii)

Ascertaining whether the employees continue to be entitled to benefits provided by the employer

in cash and kind being benefits in consideration of which exemption is being granted under this

notification; or

198

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(iv)

Ascertaining whether any of the provisions of the Act had been complied with during the period

when such provisions were in force in relation to the said factory to be empowered to:

(a) require the principal or immediate employer to him such information as he may consider

necessary for the purpose of this Act; or

(b) at any reasonable time enter any factory, establishment, office or other premises occupied by

such principal or immediate employer at any reasonable time and require any person found

in charge thereof to produce to such inspector or other official and allow him to examine

accounts, books and other documents relating to the employment of personal and payment of

wages or to furnish to him such information as he may consider necessary; or

(c) examine the principal or immediate employer, his agent or servant, or any person found in

such factory, establishment, office or other premises or any person whom the said inspector

or other official has reasonable cause to believe to have been an employee ; or

(d) make copies of or take extracts from any register, account book or other document

maintained in such factory, establishment, office or other premises,

(e) exercise such other powers as may be prescribed.

(6)

In case of disinvestment/corporatization, the exemption granted shall become automatically cancelled

and then the new entity will have to approach the appropriate Government for exemption.

[No. S-38014/07/2013-SS-I]

S. K. SINGH, Under Secy.

ubZ fnYyh] 3 tuojh] 2018

dk-vk- 73-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj dkaMyk iksVZ

VªLV ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn (xqtjkr) ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 121@2010) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

03-01-2018 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&37011@13@2008&vkbZvkj (ch&II)º

jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 3rd January, 2018

S.O. 73.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 121/2010) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of

Kandla Port Trust and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 03.01.2018.

[No. L-37011/13/2008-IR (B-II)]

RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 07th December, 2017

Reference: (CGITA) No. 121/2010

The Chairman,

Kandla Port Trust,

P.O. Box No. 50,

Gandhidham, Kutch (Gujarat)

…First Party

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

199

V/s

The General Secretary,

Transport & Dock Workers Union,

Kandla, 21, Yogesh Building, Plot No. 586,

12-C, Gandhidham,

Kutch (Gujarat)

…Second Party

For the First Party

:

Shri K.V. Gadhia

For the Second Party

:

None

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No.

L-37011/13/2008-IR(B-II) dated 25.03.2009 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the chairman, Kandla Port Trust, P.O. Box No. 50, Gandhidham, Kutch in not

providing higher grade salary to Shri Sajan Karvadira, Parmar Sandeep, Smt. Sunita Punjwani, Junior

Engineer Civil Gr. I w.e.f. 01.08.2007 to 09.09.2007 is legal and justified? What relief the concerned workmen

is entitled to?”

1.

The reference dates back to 25.03.2009.Despite service of notice to both the party, the second party does not

prefer to submit the statement of claim despite giving dozen of opportunities. The reference is approximately 9 years

old and the first party filed the vakalatpatra of his advocate. The second party advocate failed to explain as to why the

statement of claim has not been filed. Thus it appears that the second party is not willing to prosecute the reference.

2.

Thus the reference is disposed of in the absence of the statement of claim of the second party with the

observation as under: ‘‘the action of the chairman, Kandla Port Trust, P.O. Box No. 50, Gandhidham, Kutch in not

providing higher grade salary to Shri Sajan Karvadira, Parmar Sandeep, Smt. Sunita Punjwani, Junior Engineer Civil

Gr. I w.e.f. 01.08.2007 to 09.09.2007 is legal and justified.”

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 3 tuojh] 2018

dk-vk- 74-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj dkaMyk iksVZ

VªLV ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn (xqtjkr) ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 128@2010) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

03-01-2018 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&37011@6@2009&vkbZvkj (ch&II)º

jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 3rd January, 2018

S.O. 74.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 128/2010) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of

Kandla Port Trust and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 03.01.2018.

[No. L-37011/6/2009-IR (B-II)]

RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 07th December, 2017

200

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Reference: (CGITA) No. 128/2010

The Chairman,

Kandla Port Trust,

P.O. Box No. 50,

Gandhidham, Kutch (Gujarat)

…First Party

V/s

The General Secretary,

Transport & Dock Workers Union,

Kandla, 21, Yogesh Building, Plot No. 586,

12-C, Gandhidham,

Kutch (Gujarat)

…Second Party

For the First Party

:

Shri K.V. Gadhia

For the Second Party

:

None

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-37011/6/2009-

IR(B-II) dated 31.12.2009 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in

respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the chairman, Kandla Port Trust, Kandla, Gandhidham in not regularizing Shri Hadiya

Bhupendra Jetha as regular Mistry against the vacant post is legal and justified? What relief the workman is

entitled?”

1.

The reference dates back to 31.12.2009.Despite service of notice to both the party, the second party does not

prefer to submit the statement of claim despite giving dozen of opportunities. The reference is approximately 9 years

old and the first party filed the vakalatpatra of his advocate. The second party advocate failed to explain as to why the

statement of claim has not been filed.

2.

Thus it appears that the second party is not willing to prosecute the reference.

3.

Thus the reference is disposed of in the absence of the statement of claim of the second party with the

observation as under: “the action of the chairman, Kandla Port Trust, Kandla, Gandhidham in not regularizing Shri

Hadiya Bhupendra Jetha as regular Mistry against the vacant post is legal and justified.”

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 3 tuojh] 2018

dk-vk- 75-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj dkaMyk iksVZ

VªLV ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn (xqtjkr) ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 194@2013) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

03-01-2018 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&37011@13@2013&vkbZvkj (ch&II)º

jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 3rd January, 2018

S.O. 75.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 194/2013) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of

Kandla Port Trust and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 03.01.2018.

[No. L-37011/13/2013-IR (B-II)]

RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

201

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 07th December, 2017

Reference: (CGITA) No. 194/2013

The Secretary,

Kandla Port Trust, Administrative Office,

P.O. Box No. 50,

Gandhidham, Kutch (Gujarat)

…First Party

V/s

The General Secretary,

Transport & Dock Workers Union,

Kandla, 21, Yogesh Building, Plot No. 586,

12-C, Gandhidham,

Kutch (Gujarat)

…Second Party

For the First Party

:

Shri K.V. Gadhia

For the Second Party

:

None

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No.

L-37011/13/2013-IR(B-II) dated 19.11.2013 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of M/s Golden Horn Containers Service, Gandhidham in terminating

the services of 35 workmen without due process is justified? What relief these 35 workman are entitled to?”

1.

The reference dates back to 19.11.2013.Despite service of notice to both the party, the second party does not

prefer to submit the statement of claim despite giving dozen of opportunities. The reference is more than 4 years old

and the first party filed the vakalatpatra of his advocate. The second party advocate failed to explain as to why the

statement of claim has not been filed.

2.

Thus it appears that the second party is not willing to prosecute the reference.

3.

Thus the reference is disposed of in the absence of the statement of claim of the second party with the

observation as under:”the action of the management of M/s Golden Horn Containers Service, Gandhidham in

terminating the services of 35 workmen without due process is justified.”

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 3 tuojh] 2018

dk-vk- 76-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj ;wukbVsM cSad

vkWiQ bafM;k ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn (xqtjkr) ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 344@2004) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

03-01-2018 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&12011@128@2000&vkbZvkj (ch&II)º

jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

202

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 3rd January, 2018

S.O. 76.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 344/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of

United Bank of India and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 03.01.2018.

[No. L-12011/128/2000-IR (B-II)]

RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 07th December, 2017

Reference: (CGITA) No. 344/2004

The Chief Regional Manager,

United Bank of India,

Western Region, 5th Floor, 25, sir Pheroz Shah Mehta Road,

Mumbai – 400001

…First Party

V/s

The Joint Secretary,

United Bank of India Sramik Karmachari Samity,

C/o UBI, Manekchawk Branch, Manekchawk,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380001

…Second Party

For the First Party

:

Shri K.V. Gadhia

For the Second Party

:

Shri B.M. Joshi

MODIFIED AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-12011/128/2000-

IR(B-II) dated 29.09.2000 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in

respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of United Bank of India in denying pensionary benefits to Shri B.H.

Chaudhary employed as permanent part-time Sweeper by rejecting his option for pension dated 29.09.1994 is

legal and justified? If not then to what relief the concerned workman is entitled to?”

1.

The reference dates back to 29.09.2000. The second party submitted the statement of claim Ex. 4 on 20.11.2000

along with number of documents and Solicitor Firm K.V. Gadhia Associates submitted the vakalatpatra Ex. 8 on

19.02.2011 but did not prefer to submit the written statement. Since the submission of vakalatpatra Ex. 8 by the first

party, the second party union failed to appear in person to lead his evidence. The advocate of the second party stated in

the court on 23.08.2017 that he tried to contact his client by writing a letter but he has not responded. It is also

noteworthy that on 06.02.2017, a notice was issued to the second party union to appear and lead evidence on

21.03.2017 but on 21.03.2017 and thereafter on 11.05.2017, 07.06.2017 and 23.08.2017, the second party union did not

appear. Thus in the light of the statement of the advocate and non-appearance of the second party union on aforesaid

dates, indicates that the second party union is not willing to prosecute the case.

2.

Thus the reference in the absence of the evidence of the second party, is finally disposed of with the observation

as under: “the action of the management of United Bank of India in denying pensionary benefits to Shri B.H.

Chaudhary employed as permanent part-time Sweeper by rejecting his option for pension dated 29.09.1994 is legal and

justified.”

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

203

ubZ fnYyh] 3 tuojh] 2018

dk-vk- 77-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj cSad vkWiQ

bafM;k ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn (xqtjkr) ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 60@2005) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

03-01-2018 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&12012@41@2005&vkbZvkj (ch&II)º

jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 3rd January, 2018

S.O. 77.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 60/2005) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of

Bank of India and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 03.01.2018.

[No. L-12012/41/2005-IR (B-II)]

RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 06th December, 2017

Reference: (CGITA) No. 60/2005

The Zonal Manager,

Bank of India,

Ahmedabad Zone, Bhadra,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

…First Party

V/s

The General Secretary,

Bank of India Staff Co-op. Housing Society,

No. 2, Near H.L. Commerce College,

Opp. Choice Restaurant Gali, Navrangpura,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

…Second Party

For the First Party

:

Shri D.C. Gandhi

For the Second Party

:

Shri Hemal K. Acharya

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No.

L-12012/41/2005-IR(B-II) dated 20.07.2005 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of Bank of India in terminating the services of Shri D.M. Baxi from

the post of Cashier from its Relief Road Branch, Ahmedabad by imposing the punishment of compulsory

retirement is legal and justified? If not to what relief is the workman is entitled to and what extent?”

1.

The reference dates back to 20.07.2005.The second party workman in his statement of claim Ex. 4 has alleged

that he was appointed as Cash-cum-Accounts Clerk by the first party The Zonal Manager,Bank of India, Ahmedabad

204

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Zone, Bhadra, Ahmedabad, hereinafter referred to as first party on 15.12.1972. He had been working in various

branches of the first party with a record of satisfactory work and conduct and later on, he was promoted as Cashier and

Head Cashier in the category of C and E respectively. He has further alleged that on 31.05.2000, while he was working

as Head Cashier category E at Relief Road Branch of Ahmedabad, the Sepoy attached to the cash department of the

branch came late, therefore, cash operation of the bank could not commence in time and he himself managed the cash

from the cash safety to the various co-cashiers for the commencement of the work. But the manager of the branch

desired that he should hand over the charge of the cash to another cashier which he refused to do so unless the

procedure as required by manual of instructions is followed. Disregarding the said laid down procedure, the manager

insisted to his aforesaid decision. Consequently, the workman lost his control and resultantly he misbehaved with the

branch manager. He has further alleged that the branch manager reported the said incidence in a strict manner to the

competent authority, therefore, he was put under suspension on 01.06.2000 and a charge-sheet dated 20.07.2000 was

served on him, inter alia with following charges:

i.

Reporting late for duties on 31.05.2000, leaving the cash cabin endangering the safety and security of

cash, refusing to discharge the duties allotted and halting the functioning of the branch affecting customer

service;

ii.

Refusing to handover charge of the cash and throwing away the keys;

iii.

Abusing the manager using filthy language and shouting at him at the top of the voice, insulting him and

challenging his authority and exhibiting riotous disorderly and indecent behaviour in the branch

premises;

iv.

Assaulting the manager and creating bas scene/nuisance in the branch premises.

He has further alleged that the charge-sheet is itself a conspiracy. He is a member of minority union; therefore,

there was no one to represent him in the department enquiry. He has further alleged that he went under depression and

has undergone a treatment of a psychiatrist. He was not given proper opportunity to defend himself as being conducted

in a flagrant violation of the principles of natural justice because he submitted his defence on 23.10.2000 and the

enquiry office submitted the report on 24.10.2000. The deputy chief general manager of the first party issued a show

cause notice on the same day with a pre-determined mind to terminate his services. The workman submitted his reply

on 27.10.2000 w.r.t. the proposed punishment of compulsory retirement and the workman raised no. of issues in the

personal hearing but to no result and he was ordered to be compulsory retirement.

2.

The first party submitted the written statement Ex. 11 denying all the allegations made in the statement of claim

regarding mala-fide and flagrant violation of principles of natural justice in conducting the departmental enquiry and

proposed punishment. The first party has submitted no. of documents regarding department enquiry.

3.

The second party workman challenged the legality of the enquiry and submitted his affidavit Ex. 10 reiterating

the averments made in the statement of claim but in his cross-examination, he has stated that the department enquiry

was concluded on 18.10.2002 but he has not said anything which may create doubt regarding the enquiry.

4.

Later the record reveals that the workman has expired on 03.03.2014, vide application Ex. 13, his legal heirs is

substituted but he did not pursue the case. Since then, they have not been appearing. The charges levelled in the charge-

sheet are serious one and the punishment of compulsory retirement was imposed and I do not find any illegality in the

department enquiry and the punishment imposed. It is also noteworthy that the compulsory retirement does not deprive

the workman or his family from the gratuity, provident fund and pension. Therefore, no interference is required.

5.

The award is passed accordingly.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 3 tuojh] 2018

dk-vk- 78-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj dkaMyk iksVZ

VªLV ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn (xqtjkr) ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 119@2010) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

03-01-2018 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&37011@9@2008&vkbZvkj (ch&II)º

jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

205

New Delhi, the 3rd January, 2018

S.O. 78.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 119/2010) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of

Kandla Port Trust and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 03.01.2018.

[No. L-37011/9/2008-IR (B-II)]

RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 07th December, 2017

Reference: (CGITA) No. 119/2010

The Chairman,

Kandla Port Trust,

P.O. Box No. 50,

Gandhidham, Kutch (Gujarat)

…First Party

V/s

The General Secretary,

Transport & Dock Workers Union,

Kandla, 21, Yogesh Building, Plot No. 586,

12-C, Gandhidham,

Kutch (Gujarat)

…Second Party

For the First Party

:

Shri K.V. Gadhia

For the Second Party

:

None

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-37011/9/2008-

IR(B-II) dated 10.02.2009 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in

respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of Kandla Port Trust, P.O. Box No. 50, Gandhidham, Kutch in

posting of Dresser in place of First Aider after retirement of Shri Shobnath Tiwari, First Aider, is legal and

justified? What relief the workman concerned is entitled to?”

1.

The reference dates back to 10.02.2009.Despite service of notice to both the party, the second party does not

prefer to submit the statement of claim despite giving dozen of opportunities. The reference is approximately9 years old

and the first party filed the vakalatpatra of his advocate. The second party advocate failed to explain as to why the

statement of claim has not been filed. Thus it appears that the second party is not willing to prosecute the reference.

2.

Thus the reference is disposed of in the absence of the statement of claim of the second party with the

observation as under:”the action of the management of Kandla Port Trust, P.O. Box No. 50, Gandhidham, Kutch in

posting of Dresser in place of First Aider after retirement of Shri Shobnath Tiwari, First Aider, is legal and justified.”

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 3 tuojh] 2018

dk-vk- 79-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj fot;k cSad

ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

206

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn (xqtjkr) ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 377@2004) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

03-01-2018 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&12011@241@2000&vkbZvkj (ch&II)º

jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 3rd January, 2018

S.O. 79.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 377/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of

Vijaya Bank and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 03.01.2018.

[No. L-12011/241/2000-IR (B-II)]

RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 08th December, 2017

Reference: (CGITA) No. 377/2004

The Branch Manager,

Vijaya Bank, Regional Office,

Kamdhenu Complex, Near Polytechnic, Ambawadi,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

…First Party

V/s

The General Secretary,

Vijaya Bank Workers Organisation,

C/o Vijaya Bank, Navarangpura Branch,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

…Second Party

For the First Party

:

Shri Sanjay Kurian

For the Second Party

:

Shri K.R. Mishra

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-

12011/241/2000-IR(B-II) dated 29.01.2001 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad

(Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of Vijaya Bank, Regional Office, Ahmedabad in

terminating/discontinuing the services of temporary/casual employees Shri Vithalbhai Veljibhai Leeva and 23

others w.e.f. 15.11.1995 without complying the provisions of Section 25 F, G and H of the Industrial Dispute

Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, then to what relief the concerned employees are entitled to?”

1.

The reference dates back to 29.01.2001.The second party submitted the statement of claim on 17.09.2004

enclosed with the list of workmen along with application Ex. 10 for staying the recruitment process likely to be

followed by the management violating the due process of law. The then Presiding Office vide order Ex. 17 dated

14.06.2011 stayed the recruitment process as prayed by the second party union/workmen.

2.

The first party submitted the written statement Ex. 26 on 18.11.2011. Thereafter, the second party submitted the

affidavits Ex. 28, 29, 30, 31 and 32 of the workmen Manojkumar Deepaji Mahabhar, Govind Mangalsinh Devda, Amit

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

207

Ambalal Raval, Shailesh Bhagchandra Bhrambhatt and Chetan Bhikhabhai Solanki respectively. None of the witness

was cross-examined by the first party despite giving number of opportunities. Thereafter, the second party advocate

moved an application Ex. 33 on 21.01.2013 for closing the right of first party to cross-examine the aforesaid witnesses.

Since then, the second party and his witnesses have been absent and have not been appearing despite giving number of

opportunities. Today on 08.12.2017, the advocate for the second party union Shri K.R. Mishra orally stated that the

matter has been settled between the parties and the second party union and its workmen have not been in his contact,

therefore, the second party has not been appearing. The advocate for the first party is present for cross-examining the

aforesaid second party witness.

3.

Thus it appears that second party union or the workmen are not willing to prosecute the case.

4.

Thus the reference is disposed of in the absence of the evidence of the second party union/workmen with the

observation as under: ‘‘the action of the management of Vijaya Bank, Regional Office, Ahmedabad in

terminating/discontinuing the services of temporary/casual employees Shri Vithalbhai Veljibhai Leeva and 23 others

w.e.f. 15.11.1995 without complying the provisions of Section 25 F, G and H of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 is

legal and justified.”

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 3 tuojh] 2018

dk-vk- 80-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj ikjknhi iksVZ

VªLV ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] Hkqous'oj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 15@2017) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

03-01-2018 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&38011@03@2016&vkbZvkj (ch&II)º

jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 3rd January, 2018

S.O. 80.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 15/2017) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Bhubaneswar as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Paradip

Port Trust and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 03.01.2018.

[No. L-38011/03/2016-IR (B-II)]

RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, BHUBANESWAR

Present:

Shri B.C. Rath,

Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-cum-Labour

Court, Bhubaneswar

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 15/2017

No. L-38011/03/2016-IR(B-II), dated 13.02.2017

Date of Passing Order – 15th November, 2017

Between:

The Chairman,

Paradip Port Trust, Paradip,

Dist. Jagatsinghpur, Odisha

…1st Party-Management

(And)

The General Secretary,

Paradip Port Workers Union,

Badapadia, Paradip Port, Jagatsinghpur,

Odisha

…2nd Party-Union

208

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Appearances:

None

…

For the 1st Party-Management

None

…

For the 2nd Party-Union

ORDER

Case taken up. Parties are absent. The 2nd Party-Union has not filed any statement of claim despite notice

through regd. post. As such, it seems that the 2nd party-Union is not interested in prosecuting its case. However the

dispute cannot be adjudicated upon for want of pleadings on behalf of the parties. As such there is no alternative except

to return the reference to the Government for necessary action at its end.

2.

Accordingly the reference is returned to the Government unanswered for necessary action at its end.

Dictated & Corrected by me.

B. C. RATH, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 3 tuojh] 2018

dk-vk- 81-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj dksjiksjs'ku

cSad ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- 1] fnYyh ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 70@2017) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

03-01-2018 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&12012@09@2017&vkbZvkj (ch&II)º

jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 3rd January, 2018

S.O. 81.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 70/2017) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court No. 1, Delhi as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of

Corpoaration Bank and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 03.01.2018.

[No. L-12012/09/2017-IR (B-II)]

RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

IN THE COURT OF SHRI AVTAR CHAND DOGRA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT NO.1, ROOM NO. 511, DWARKA COURT COMPLEX,

SECTOR-10 DWARKA, DELHI-110075

ID. No. 70/2017

Shri Nirmal Prasad, C/o Corporation Bank,

Safai Karmachari Sangh, Office: 6054,

Gali Mandir Satya Naryana, Nabi Karim,

Paharganj

New Delhi-110055

…Claimant

Versus

1.

General Manager,

Personnel Administrative Division,

Industrial Relations Wing, Head Office,

Mangala Devi Temple Road,

Mangalore-575001

2.

The General Manager,

TAD, Corporation Bank,

Deshbhandu, Gupta Road, Karol Bagh,

New Delhi-110005

…Managements

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

209

AWARD

In the present case, a reference was received from the appropriate Government vide letter No.L-

12012/09/2017(IR(B-II)) dated 20.03.2017 under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the

Act, for adjudication of a dispute, terms of which are as under:

“Whether the workman Shri Nirmal Prasad, M.No. 1685, Part Time Sweeper is entitled for the difference of

salary for the period of suspension from the Management of Corporation Bank after conclusion of proceedings

and order by the Appellate Authority? If not, then what relief the workman is entitled to?”

2.

In the reference order, the appropriate Government commanded the party/ies raising the dispute to file statement

of claim, complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses with this Tribunal within 15 days of receipt

of the reference order and to forward a copy of such statement of claim to the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

Despite directions so given, Claimant opted not to file his claim statement with the Tribunal.

3.

On receipt of the above reference, notice was sent to the workman as well as the managements. Neither the

postal article sent to the claimant, referred above, was received back nor was it observed by the Tribunal that postal

services remained affected during the period, referred above. Therefore, every presumption lies in favour of the fact

that the above notice was served upon the claimant. Despite service of the notice, claimant opted to abstain away from

the proceedings. No claim statement was filed on his behalf. Thus, it is clear that the claimant is not interested in

adjudication of the reference on merits.

4.

Since the claimant has neither put in his appearance nor has he led any evidence so as to prove his cause against

the management, as such, this Tribunal is left with no choice, except to pass a ‘No Dispute/Claim’ award. Let this

award be sent to the appropriate Government, as required under Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, for

publication.

Date : December 14, 2017

A. C. DOGRA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 3 tuojh] 2018

dk-vk- 82-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vksfj;UVy

cSad vkWiQ dkelZ ds izca/ra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/ esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vf/dj.k@Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 30@2007) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

03-01-2018 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&12012@115@2006&vkbZvkj (ch&II)º

jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 3rd January, 2018

S.O. 82.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 30/2007) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Oriental

Bank of Commerce and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 03.01.2018.

[No. L-12012/115/2006-IR (B-II)]

RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT AT

HYDERABAD

Present : Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer

Dated the 27th day of October, 2017

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 30/2007

Between :

Sri T. Rajender Singh,

8-3-228/606/1, Rahmath Nagar,

Yousufguda,

Hyderabad -45

…Petitioner

210

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

AND

The General Manager (HRD),

Oriental Bank of Commerce,

S.B.U., Ashoka My Home Chambers,

1-8-303, Sardar Patel Road,

Secunderabad – 500 003

…Respondent

Appearances :

For the Petitioner

:

Sri William Burra, Advocate

For the Respondent

:

M/s. K. Raghuram Reddy & M. Subramanya Sastry, Advocates

AWARD

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its order No. L-12012/115/2006-IR(B-II) dated 5.6.2007

referred the following dispute under section 10(1)(d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 requiring this forum to decide the question:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of Oriental Bank of Commerce by regularising the services of some

of the workmen of erstwhile Global Trust Bank and not regularising the services of Shri T. Rajender Singh,

Ex-runner is legal and/or justified? If not, what relief the workman is entitled to?”

On receipt of the reference this Tribunal has registered and numbered the reference as I.D. No. 30/2007 and

issued notices to both the workman and the management. They both appeared before the court and engaged their

respective counsels with the leave of the court and consent of either party.

2.

The averments made in the claim statement in brief are as follows:

It is submitted that the Petitioner worked as Runner from 1.2.1997 to 30.11.2005 in erstwhile Global Trust Bank

and later in the Oriental Bank of Commerce, Secunderabad. Initially, he worked as Runner through M/s. Agile and

Suraksha Security Services from 1.2.1997 to 31.1.2001 and through Global Corporate Services from 1.2.2001 to

14.8.2004 and thereafter worked through the same agency from 14.8.2004 onwards for Oriental Bank of Commerce,

Secunderabad. The Petitioner submits that other workmen who worked with him in similar capacity in the erstwhile

Global Trust Bank are absorbed in the Oriental Bank of Commerce, whereas he was not considered on the grounds of

eligibility criteria. The Petitioner’s total service was more than 8 years and he has worked for more than 300 days in

each year. He studied upto 8th class and also able to read and write, three languages, viz., Telugu, English and Hindi. It

is further stated that the Respondent management has entered into an agreement with the representatives of the

Federation, New Delhi on 30.9.2005, wherein it was agreed to absorb the erstwhile runners working through agencies

as Peons in subordinate cadre with minimum educational qualification of 8th standard. Even though the Petitioner has

fulfilled all the conditions laid down for absorption his application was not considered. The details of attendance

shows that during the year 2004-2005, the Petitioner worked for more than 240 days in a year. Provisions of Sec.25-F

were not observed in terminating the services of the Petitioner. He prayed to direct the Respondent bank for his

absorption/reinstatement with back wages, continuity of service and other attendant benefits.

3.

Respondents filed their counter with the averments in brief as follows:

There is no employer-employee relationship between the Respondent bank and the Petitioner as he was engaged

as Runner through M/s Agile and Suraksha Security Services for some time and thereafter through M/s Global

Corporate Services, as admitted by him. It can not be said that the Petitioner was ever a workman as no appointment

letter was issued to him by the erstwhile Global Trust Bank or by the Oriental Bank of Commerce. After merger of

Global Trust Bank with Oriental Bank of Commerce the Respondent bank was under no obligation to absorb the

employee of outsourcing agency who was working on their behalf for Global Trust Bank. However, as per the

guidelines approved by the Board of Directors of the Bank, a circular dated 28.10.2005 was issued which provides

that only those persons who were working through the outsourcing agencies with erstwhile Global Trust Bank as on the

date of amalgamation i.e., 14.8.2004 will be eligible for consideration for absorption subject to fulfilling other

conditions of eligibility criteria. The Petitioner does not possess the required educational qualification is pass in VIII

standard as per the said circular, thus, he was not considered for absorption and he was informed accordingly.

Therefore, the present reference is not maintainable in law and liable to be rejected.

4.

The Petitioner has examined himself as WW1 and has also exhibited the photostat copies of four documents

which are marked as i.e., Ex.W1 to W4. The Respondent has examined Sri J.P. Sarma, the Chief Manager of the Bank

as MW1 and Sri Dr. Vijay Kumar, the Senior Manager of the Bank as MW2 on their behalf and also relied on eight

documents which have been marked as exhibits Ex.M1 to M8.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

211

5.

I have already heard from both the sides in this matter.

6.

In view of the pleadings of both the sides, the points for consideration are as follows:

I.

Whether the action of the management of Oriental Bank of Commerce by regularising the services of

some of the workmen of erstwhile Global Trust Bank and not regularising the services of Shri T.

Rajender Singh, Ex-runner is legal and/or justified?

II.

If not, what relief the workman is entitled to?

7.

The Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner contended that the Petitioner worked as a Runner

from 1.2.1997 to 30.11.2005 in the erstwhile Global Trust Bank and later in the Oriental Bank of Commerce at

Secunderabad. Initially, the Petitioner worked as a Runner through M/s. Agile and Suraksha Security Services from

1.2.1997 to 31.1.2001 and through Global Corporate Services from 1.2.2001 to 14.8.2004 and thereafter worked

through the same agency from 15.8.2004 onwards for the Respondent (Oriental Bank of Commerce, Secunderabad). In

all the Petitioner has rendered more than 8 years of service, out of which, six years through the aforesaid agencies and

about more than two years directly under the Respondent during the period from 22.8.2002 to 30.11.2005. Finally on

30.11.2005 his services were terminated. It is contended that the Petitioner worked as a Runner and he used to work

from 1997 to 2005 not less than 300 days in any calendar year. The duties of a Runner as admitted by the management

witnesses are – carrying instruments like cheques, DDs from branches to service centre, and in case runners are posted

in the administrative offices, they used to take care distribution of dispatch within the office/Department and related

filing works. It is further contended that the nature of work of Runner as admitted by the management witness is

perennial in nature. The engagement of contract labour in such work through outsourcing agency is only “Sham”

contract. Therefore, the Petitioner is deemed to be an employee directly employed by the Respondent bank during the

period from 1.2.1997 to 30.11.2005. Thus, the services rendered by the Petitioner through outsourcing agencies firstly

with the erstwhile Global Trust Bank and secondly with the Oriental Bank of Commerce is a “sham” contract. Hence,

the Petitioner is deemed to be an employee directly by the bank and hence in this case master and servant relationship

or employer and employee relationship is clearly established. It is also contended that the other workmen who worked

with the Petitioner in similar capacity in the erstwhile Global Trust Bank are absorbed in the Oriental Bank of

Commerce whereas, the Petitioner was not considered on the ground of eligibility criteria. The Petitioner’s total

service was more than 8 years and he has worked for more than 300 days in each year. He has studied upto class VIII

and also able to read and write three languages, i.e., Telugu, English and Hindi. It is also contended that the

Respondent management has entered into an agreement with the representatives of the Federation, New Delhi on

30.9.2005 wherein it had been agreed to absorb, the erstwhile Global Trust Bank Runners working through agencies as

Peons in subordinate cadres with minimum educational qualification of 8th standard. Even though the Petitioner has

fulfilled all the conditions laid down for absorption, his application was not considered. The details of attendance

shows that during the year 2004-2005 the Petitioner has worked for more than 240 days in a year. The Respondent

bank while terminating the Petitioner from service has not followed the provisions of Sec.25-F of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947. The Petitioner is required to be absorbed as a permanent employee in the Respondent bank with

back wages, continuity of service and other attendant benefits.

8.

On the other hand, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent contended that there is no

employer and employee relationship between the Respondent bank and the Petitioner as he was engaged as a Runner

through M/s. Agile and Suraksha Security Services for some time and thereafter through Global Corporate Services as

admitted by him. As per his contention, no appointment letter was issued to the Petitioner either by the erstwhile

Global Trust Bank or by the Oriental Bank of Commerce. After merger of Global Trust Bank with the Oriental Bank

of Commerce the Respondent bank was under no obligation to absorb the employees of outsourcing agencies, who

were working on their behalf for Global Trust Bank. He further contended that as per the guidelines approved by the

Board of Directors of the Bank on 20.8.2005. One circular was issued by the Respondent, wherein it had been

provided that only those persons who were working through outsourcing agencies with the erstwhile Global Trust Bank

as on the date of amalgamation i.e., 14.8.2004 will be eligible for absorption subject to fulfilling other conditions of

eligibility criteria. As admitted by the Petitioner he does not possess the required educational qualification as required

in the guidelines. As per his contention the documents relied on by the Petitioner vide Ex.W2 clearly states that “only

those Runners/office boys who were working in the erstwhile Global Trust Bank branches/offices as on the date of

amalgamation i.e., 14.8.2004 would be eligible to apply, minimum qualification required should be 8th standard pass.

Admittedly, the Petitioner had applied for the post of Runner but Ex.W1, the Photostat copy of the form of transfer

certificate goes to show that at the time of leaving the school, the Petitioner was studying in Class VIII which clearly

indicates that he has not passed VIII standard which shows that on the own admission of the Petitioner he has not

passed VIII standard and has not fulfilled the required criteria to be absorbed as a Runner in the Respondent’s bank at

the time of its amalgamation, and for this reason the case of the Petitioner was not considered, and he had been

informed accordingly. Further more, the Petitioner has not impleaded the contractors/outsourcing agencies as parties

in this case under whom he was working and in absence of the contractors the case of as such the Petitioner is liable to

212

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

be dismissed and the Petitioner is not entitled to get any relief. Therefore, the claim of the Petitioner is not tenable in

the eye of Law, and is liable to be rejected.

9.

On consideration of the rival contentions of the Advocates of both the sides as well as the evidence adduced by

the parties and the materials available on record it is seen that no documents have been filed from the side of the

Petitioner to show that, which workmen worked with the Petitioner in similar capacity in the erstwhile Global Trust

Bank are absorbed in the Oriental Bank of Commerce. Admittedly, the Petitioner was not considered to be absorbed in

the Respondent’s bank on the ground of eligibility criteria. Pursuant to the guidelines, vide Ex.W2, the Petitioner has

applied for absorption as Runner, wherein minimum criteria to be eligible for the post was passing of class VIII.

Ex.W1 clearly indicates that the Petitioner has not passed class VIII at the time of filing of the application. When he

has not fulfilled the required criteria to be absorbed as a Runner, his case was not considered and the Respondent bank

has not regularized his services as Runner and the same has been intimated to the Petitioner. in such a circumstances, it

can safely be stated that the action of the Respondent bank in not regularising the service of Sri T. Rajendar Singh,

Ex.Runner is not legal and justified.

Thus, Point No.I is answered accordingly.

10.

Point No.II: Admittedly, the Petitioner was working as a Runner through M/s. Agile and Suraksha Security

Services from 1.2.1997 to 31.1.2001 and through Global Corporate Services from 1.2.2001 to 14.8.2004 and thereafter

worked through the same agency from 14.8.2004 onwards for the Respondent. The Respondent has utilized the

services of the Petitioner for a long period. MW2 in his cross examination has clearly admitted that the contract

agreement entered between the erstwhile Global Trust Bank and Global Corporate Services, Ex.M5 came into force on

22.8.2000 and expired after completion of 24 months for a period of two years which was directly with the erstwhile

Global Trust Bank. Therefore the service rendered by the Petitioner though through outsourcing agency, but it was

taken directly under the Respondent from 22.8.2000 to 14.8.2004, similarly when the Global Trust Bank was

amalgamated with Oriental Bank of Commerce, from 14.8.2004 onwards, the Petitioner rendered service directly

under the Oriental Bank of Commerce, and he was terminated after lapse of one year of the amalgamation, i.e., from

14.8.2004 to 30.11.2005, which clearly shows that the Petitioner has rendered his services to Respondent during the

aforesaid period. It is also not known how the Respondent was utilizing the services of the Petitioner from 22.8.2002

onwards when admittedly there was no agreement between the Respondent and the outsourcing agencies. This shows

that the Respondent was well aware of the fact that the Petitioner is working under its establishment as a workman and

the Respondent has utilized the services of the Petitioner like an employee of the establishment and as such, employer

and employee relationship was existing between the Respondent and the Petitioner, and the plea of the Respondent that

they were utilizing the services of the Petitioner only through outsourcing agency i.e., the contractors, is not

acceptable. Moreover, the Respondent has failed either to produce any document or to show any reason in which way

he has engaged the Petitioner in his establishment after its amalgamation. Further more, the Respondent has admitted

that bank has considered the application of the Petitioner for his absorption as Runner but as the Petitioner failed to

fulfill the required criteria for the post of Runner. It was not considered. This shows that when the case of the

Petitioner was not considered and the Respondent has failed to absorb him in the bank, he terminated the services of

the Petitioner. But Before termination of the Petitioner from service the Respondent bank had to see the plight of the

workman, when workman had worked for more than 8 years under its establishment through outsourcing agency as

well as directly and was also acquainted with the work culture. In such a circumstances the Respondent should have

engaged the workman atleast as a daily rated labour. But the Respondent has not considered the case of the workman.

More over, while terminating the services of the Petitioner the Respondent has to comply with the provisions required

under Sec.25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, but in this case, it has not been done. Admittedly, the Petitioner

has worked for more than 8 years under the Respondent, through different agencies continuously as a Runner and also

out of which, for one year and four months directly under the Respondent and as such, the Petitioner comes under the

definition of a workman under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. When the Petitioner was retrenched from service the

Respondent was expected to retrench the workman as per the provisions contained under Sec.25.F of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947. But in this case the Respondent has not complied it. Therefore, the termination/retrenchment of

the Petitioner workman is in violation of Sec.25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Since the Respondent has not

shown the reasons for the retrenchment of the workman and even the workman is not in receipt of any notice of

termination or notice or notice pay/one month pay and if the workman was not paid any retrenchment compensation of

15 days average pay for every completed year of service; the retrenchment or termination of the Petitioner workman is

illegal, and the Petitioner is entitled to get benefit under Sec.25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

Thus, Point No.II is answered accordingly.

11.

In view of the findings given under Point Nos. I & II, the Petitioner is entitled to get a chance to work under

the Respondent atleast as a daily rated workman and is also entitled to get the terminal benefits as required under

Sec.25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

213

Result:

In view of the findings given in Point No.I, the reference is answered as follows:

The action of the management of Oriental Bank of Commerce of regularising the services of some of the

workmen erstwhile Global Trust Bank and not regularising the services of Shri T. Rajender Singh, Ex-runner is legal

and justified. But, in view of the findings given Point No.II, as the workman has not been retrenched by following due

procedure of Law, the Respondent should consider the Petitioner for his absorption as a daily rated worker, if he is

eligible to work. If the Petitioner is not eligible to work under any rules, the Respondent is at liberty to retrench the

Petitioner only by following the procedure laid down under Sec.25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.

Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant transcribed by her and corrected by me on

this the 27th day of October, 2017.

MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the

Witnesses examined for the

Petitioner

Respondent

WW1: Sri T Rajender Singh

MW1: Sri J.P. Sarma

MW2: Sri Dr. Vijay Kumar Joseph

Documents marked for the Petitioner

Ex.W1

:

Photostat of Copy of school leaving certificate

Ex.W2

:

Photostat of circular dated 28.10.2005 issued by the Respondent bank erstwhile Global Trust

Bank

Ex.W3

:

Photostat of representation dt.28.7.2004 of WW1

Ex.W4

:

Photostat of application dt. 13.8.2004 of WW1

Documents marked for the Respondent

Ex.M1

:

Photostat of lr.No.Q&O/CMR/LET/732/2005 dt.30.11.2005

Ex.M2

:

Agreement between Globla Trust Bank and M/s Global Corporate Services

Ex.M3

:

Attendance register for the period from 1.4.2005 to 31.3.2007

Ex.M4

:

Attendance register for the period from January 2005 to January, 2006

Ex.M5

:

Agreement dt. 20.3.2002 relating to record keeping services

Ex.M6

:

Agreement relating to house keeping etc..

Ex.M7

:

Photostat copy of payment particulars of the Petitioner to the Global Corporate Services Pvt. Ltd.,

for the month of October 2005

Ex.M8

:

Photostat copy of bank statement of account of M/s Global Corporate Services Pvt. Ltd for the

period from 31.3.2000 to 6.1.2006

ubZ fnYyh] 8 tuojh] 2018

dk-vk- 83-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ feM~<k

baVjizkbtst ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] t;iqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 23@2017) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

27-12-2017 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&22012@15@2017&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º

jktsUæ flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

214

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 8th January, 2018

S.O. 83.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 23/2017) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Jaipur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. Middha

Enterprises and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 27.12.2017.

[No. L-22012/15/2017-IR (CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, JAIPUR

Presiding Officer, Bharat Pandey

I.D. 23/2017

Reference No.L-22012/15/2017[IR(CM-2)] dated: 19.7.2017

Shri Ram Kumar

S/o Sh. Hanuman Prasad Saraswat

R/o Binani Chowk, Bikaner

V/s

1.

Project Head

Neyveli Lignite Corporation

India Limited,Barsingsar,

Tehsil & District : Bikaner.

2.

Proprietor, M/s Middha Enterprises

Bikaner Road, Suratgarh – 335804.

AWARD

Dated: 28.11.2017

1.

The Central Government in exercise of the powers under clause (d) of Sub Section 1 & 2(A) of Section 10 of

the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 has referred the following Industrial dispute to this tribunal for adjudication:-

^^D;k izca/ku] eS0 us;oyh fyxukbZV dkiksZjs’ku bf.M;k fy0] chdkusj ds Bsdsnkj QeZ eS0 feM~Mk ,UVjizkbZtst lwjrx< dk

deZdkj Jh jke dqekj lqijokbZtj dks fnukad 06-01-2016 ls ukSdjh ls i`Fkd fd;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr ,oa U;k;laxr gS\ ;fn

ugh arks deZdkj D;k vuqrks"k ikus dk vf/kdkjh gS \**

2.

Pursuant to the receipt of the reference order, registered notices were issued to the parties as per the order of the

tribunal fixing. 26.10.2017 for filing statement of claim.

3.

On 26.10.17 Sh. Sunil Kumar Pareek, CPF No.36598, Manager/Geology, NLC. India Ltd., Barsingsar Project,

appeared on behalf of non-applicant. None appeared on behalf of applicant. Sh. Sunil Kumar Pareek alleged that both

the parties have entered into compromise. Next date 16.11.17 was fixed for both the parties to appear for filing

compromise or statement of claim.

4.

Sh. Sunil Kumar Pareek on 26.10.2017 filed photocopy of notice sent to non-applicant by tribunal, photocopy

of authority dated 23.10.2007 by non-applicant to Sh. Sunil Kumar Pareek to appear in tribunal on 26.10.17 for

representing the non-applicant, photocopy of minutes of meeting dated 9.6.17 about conciliation held at R.L.C., Jaipur.

The content shows that parties have agreed during conciliation to settle their dispute outside the court & withdraw the

complaint against Biharilal, Proprietor, Middha Enterprises, Bikaner Road, Suratgarh & NLC India Ltd. before the

R.L.C., Jaipur.

5.

On 30.10.2017 registered letter sent by applicant Sh. Ramkumar was received by tribunal which was taken on

record. The content of the letter says that all the parties of the case have entered into compromise & there is no

outstanding dispute between the parties which is required to be settled & applicant does not want to pursue the matter

further hence, further proceeding in the matter may be dropped. The letter has been attached with photocopy of an

undated compromise.

6.

On 16.11.2017 applicant Sh. Ramkumar personally appeared. Sh. Sunil Kumar Pareek appeared on behalf of

non-applicant. Sh. Ramkumar applicant was identified by Sh. Sunil Kumar Pareek. Both applicant & Sh. Sunil Kumar

Pareek on behalf of non-applicant filed undated original compromise which was taken on record. Content of the

compromise was read over & explained to both the parties & they admitted to have entered into the compromise

supporting the recitals of the compromise deed. Applicant Sh. Ramkumar further file an applicant to decide the case on

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

215

the basis of compromise. This application was endorsed by Sh. Sunil Kumar Pareek contending that he is not having

any objection in disposal of the matter as alleged by Sh. Ramkumar. Accordingly, matter was fixed for disposal of the

case in Lok-Adalat on 28.11.2017.

7.

The application of the applicant Sh. Ramkumar dated 16.11.2017 to dispose the case on the basis of

compromise & compromise filed on 16.11.17 read as under:-

Jheku~ U;k;ky; dsUnzh; vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k ,ao Je U;k;ky;] t;iqj

eq- la[;k 23@2017

rk- is- 16-11-2017

jkedqekj cuke eS- us;osyh fyXukbV dk- fy-

Jhekuth]

mDr muoku 'kh"kZd izdj.k esa vkt fn% 16-11-2017 dks rkjh[k is'kh fu;r gSA fuosnu gS fd izdj.k esa izfri{k la- 1 o 2 o

izfri{kh la- 3 ds chp esa vkilh lgefr ls jkthukek gks x;k gS rFkk fuLrkj.k ;ksX; dksbZ fookn 'ks"k ugha gSA jkthukes dh izfr layXu

gSA vr% Jheku~ ls fuosnu gS fd eSa jkedqekj izfri{kh la- 3 vkxs dksbZ dk;Zokgh ugha pkgrk u gh dksbZ Dyse pkgrk gwWaA

vr% izkFkZuk i= izLrqr dj fuosnu gS fd izdj.k esa jkthukek gks tkus ds vk/kkj ij ekeys dks fuLrkfjr dj vkns'k Qjek;k

tkosaA

fn% 16-11-2017

izkFkhZ

mijksDr izdkj ls ekeys

gLrk{kj iBuh;

ds fuLrkj.k ls eSa

jkedqekj iq= Jh guqeku izlkn

iw.kZr;k lger gw¡A

tkfr lkjLor fuoklh

fcUuk.kh pkSd chdkusj

gLrk{kj viBuh

Identified Mr. Ram kumar

(S.K. Pareek)

gLrk{kj viBuh;

(S.K. Pareek/NLCIL)

NLC IL on behalf of Project Head / NLC IL

layXud & 1

layXud & 1

layXud & 1

layXud & 1

jkthukek

jkthukek

jkthukek

jkthukek

¼1½ jkedqekj iq= Jh guqeku izlkn lkjLor] tkfr&lkjLor

fuoklh fcuk.kh pkSd] chdkusj] gky Mh&608]

eqjyh/kj O;kl uxj chdkusj

------izFke i{k

¼1½ izkstsDV gsM] us;osyh fyXukbV dks- fy-] cjflaglj]

rglhy o ftyk&chdkusj

¼2½

fcgkjhyky] izksijkbZVj] fe<+k bUVjizkbZtst] chdkusj jksM+]

lwjrx<+] ftyk& Jhxaxkuxj

------f}rh; i{k

;g jkthukek mHk; i{kksa }kjk vkt fnuakd 9-6-2017 dks fu"ikfnr fd;k tk jgk gSA

1-

;g fd izFke i{k f}rh; i{k ds ;gka fo/kqr lqijokbZtj ds in ij lsokjr jgk gS ftldks NaVuh ds nkSjku in eqDr djus

dks ysdj nksuksa i{kdkjksa ds e/; fookn jgk gSA mDr fookn dks ysdj izFke i{k ds }kjk {ks=h; dk;kZy;] Je vk;qDr

¼dsUnzh;½ ds le{k ifjosnu is'k fd;k x;k Fkk ftldk fu.kZ; fnukad 24-01-2017 dks ikfjr fd;k tk pqdk gSA

2-

;g fd nksuksa i{kdkjku ds e/; izkstsDV gSM o dksjiksjs'ku ds vf/kdkjh;ksa ds }kjk e/;LFkrk o okrkZ ds ifj.kke Lo:i

nksuaks i{kksa esa jkthukek gks x;k gSA

3-

;g fd izFke i{k dh NaVuh ckcr f}rh; i{kdkjku us izfrdj ¼eqvkotk½ jkf'k izFke i{k dks vnk dj nh x;h gS ftlds

ifj.kke Lo:i izFke i{k] f}rh; i{k ds fo:) lHkh dkuwuh o U;kf;d dk;Zokgh Mªki dj nsxk o iwoZ ds fookn lEcfU/kr

dksbZ dk;Zokgh ugha djsxkA

4-

;g fd izFke i{k orZeku esa f}rh; i{k ¼us;osyh fyXukbZV dks- fy-½ esa dk;Zjr gS ftldks iwoZ ds fookn dks ysdj rax o

ijs'kku ugha fd;k tk;sxkA

216

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

5-

;g fd mDr jkthukek fd lHkh 'krksZa ls nksuksa i{k ikcan jgsaxsA

mijksDr jkthukek nksuksa i{kksa }kjk jkth [kq'kh o LorU= lgefr ls fu"ikfnr fd;k x;k gSA

fu"iknudrkZ

gLrk{kj iBuh;

¼1½ ¼jkedqekj½

izFke i{k

¼1½ gLrk{kj viBuh; ¼xksy jcj lhy foi{kh½

¼2½ gLrk{kj viBuh;

jcj LVSEi ¼fe<+k bUVjizkbZtst½

f}rh; i{kdkj

8.

On 28.11.17 in Lok- Adalat case was taken up for disposal on the basis of application dated 16.11.17 to dispose

the case on the basis of compromise filed by them. None appeared from either side in the Lok-Adalat on 28.11.17,

however, the case was disposed on the basis of compromise allowing the application of the parties to dispose the case

on the basis of compromise. The order passed in Lok-Adalat on 28.11.17 is read as under:-

28-11-2017 yksd vnkyr

yksd vnkyr

yksd vnkyr

yksd vnkyr

i=koyh vkt yksd vnkyr esa izLrqr gqbZA iqdkj dh x;hA i{kdkj vuqifLFkr gSA lqygukek ds vk/kkj

ij eqdnesa dks fuLrkfjr djus dh vkosnu fnuakfdr 16-11-17 dk voyksdu fd;kA

i{kdkjksa }kjk lqygukeksa dh rlnhd fnuakd 16-11-17 dks dh tk pqdh gS] vr% i{kdkjksa dh lqygukek ds

vk/kkj ij ekeys dks fuLrkfjr djus dh vkosnu Lohdkj dh tkrh gSA bl ekeys dks i{kdkjksa }kjk izLrqr

lqygukek fnukafdr 16-11-17 ds vk/kkj ij fuLrkfjr fd;k tkrk gSA layXud&1 lqygukek ,okMZ dk va'k gksxkA

gLrk{kj viBuh;

ihBklhu vf/kdkjh

9.

Award as above.

BHARAT PANDEY, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 9 tuojh] 2018

dk-vk- 84-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ ch-lh-

lh-,y- ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- 1] /uckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 05@1998) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 08-01-2018

dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&20012@400@1996&vkbZvkj (lh&I)º

,e- ds- flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 9th January, 2018

S.O. 84.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1,

Dhanbad (Ref. No. 05 of 1998) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to

the management of M/s. BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 08.01.2018.

[No. L-20012/400/1996-IR (C-I)]

M. K. SINGH, Section Officer

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

217

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 1, DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D. Act, 1947

Reference : No. 05/1998

Employer in relation to the management of Govindpur Area of M/s. BCCL

AND

Their workman

Present : Shri R. K. Saran, Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers

:

None

For the workman

:

None

State : Jharkhand

Industry : Coal

Dated- 16.11.2017

AWARD

By order No. L-20012/400/1996-IR(C-I) dated 31.12.1997 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour

has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub–section (1) and sub-section (2A) of section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of Govindpur Area of M/s. BCCL in dismissing Sh. Baldeo

Das, Miner/Loader w.e.f. 06/08/1993 is justified? If not, to what relief is the concerned workman

entitled?”

2.

After receipt of the reference, both parties are noticed. But appearing for certain dates none appears

subsequently. Case remains pending. It is felt that the disputes between the parties have been resolved in the meantime.

Hence No Dispute Award is passed. Communicate.

R. K. SARAN, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 9 tuojh] 2018

dk-vk- 85-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ ch-lh-

lh-,y- ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- 1] /uckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 25@2010) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 29-12-2017

dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&20012@101@2009&vkbZvkj (lh,e&I)º

,e- ds- flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 9th January, 2018

S.O. 85.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1,

Dhanbad (Ref. No. 25 of 2010) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to

the management of M/s. BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 29.12.2017.

[No. L-20012/101/2009-IR (CM-I)]

M. K. SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 1, DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D. Act, 1947

Reference No. 25 of 2010

Employer in relation to the management of C.V. Area of M/s. BCCL

218

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

AND

Their workman

Present : Shri R. K. Saran, Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers

:

Shri S.N.Ghosh, Advocate

For the workman

:

Shri R.R. Ram, Rep.

State : Jharkhand

Industry : Coal

Dated- 6.12.2017

AWARD

By order No.-L-20012/101/2009 IR-(CM-I), dated.19.02.2010 the Central Govt. in the Ministry of Labour has,

in exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub–Section (1) and Sub-Section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act.1947, referred the following disputes for adjudication to this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of Basantimata Colliery under C.V.Area of M/s. BCCL in

dismissing Shri Khiru Bhuia UG Loader from the service of the company is justified and legal? To

what relief is the workman concerned entitled ?”

2.

The case is received from the Ministry of Labour on 08.03.2010. After receipt of reference , both parties are

noticed, but after long delay the Sponsoring Union files their written statement on 15.05.2017. And the management

files their written statement -cum-rejoinder on 03.08.2017. The point involved in the reference is that the workman has

been dismissed from his services on 12.08.2005.

3.

During preliminary hearing of this case, domestic enquiry held by the management is accepted by the

Sponsoring Union/workman as Fair & Proper .

4.

The point involved in the reference is that the workman has been dismissed from his services on the ground of

long absence. But he has already out of service since last 12 years. It is felt to give another chance to the workman

concerned to serve.

5.

Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, I hold that he be taken into job as a fresh employee in cat-I.

But the workman be kept under probation for a period of two year. Therefore the question of back wages does not arise

at all.

This is my award.

R. K. SARAN, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 9 tuojh] 2018

dk-vk- 86-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ ch-lh-

lh-,y- ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- 2] /uckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 30@2016) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 11-12-2017

dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&20012@164@2015&vkbZvkj (lh,e&I)º

,e- ds- flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 9th January, 2018

S.O. 86.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 2,

Dhanbad (Ref. No. 30 of 2016) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to

the management of M/s. BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 11.12.2017.

[No. L-20012/164/2015-IR (CM-I)]

M. K. SINGH, Section Officer

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

219

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO.2), AT DHANBAD

PRESENT : Shri R.K.Saran, Presiding Officer

In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1) (d) of the I.D. Act, 1947

REFERENCE No. 30 OF 2016

PARTIES

:

The Secretary,

Janta Mazdoor Sangh,

Old Rajagarh, Bakri Hat,, PO: Jharia,: Dhanbad-828111

Vs.

The General Manager,

Kusunda Area of M/s. BCCL,

P.O. Kusunda,, Distt: Dhanbad.828116.

Order No. L-20012/164/2015-IR(CM-I) dt. 10.02.2016

APPEARANCES

:

On behalf of the workman/Union

:

Mr.Vivek Kumar Ld. Representative

n behalf of the Management

:

Mr.Gopal Tiwari Management Representative

State : Jharkhand

Industry : Coal

Dated, Dhanbad, the 27th October, 2017

AWARD

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Sec.10(1)(d)

of the I.D. Act.,1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No.L-

20012/164/2015-IR(CM-I) dt. 10.02.2016.

SCHEDULE

Whether the action of the Management of Burragarh Colliery under P.B. Area of M/s BCCL in

dismissing Sri Chandradeo, M/Loader vide letter dated 27.12.2002 is fair and justified? To what relief

the concerned workman is entitled to

On receipt of the Order No. L-20012/164/2015-IR(CM-I) dt. 10.02.2016 mentioned reference from the

Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment, New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, the Reference

Case No. 30 of 2016 was registered on 04.03.2016 and accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue notices

through the Registered Posts to the parties concerned, directing them to appear in the Court on the date fixed, and to

file their written statements along with the relevant documents. In pursuance of the said order, notices by the Registered

Posts were sent to the parties concerned.

Both the parties made their appearances and filed their pleadings and photocopies of their documents. The

Union and the O.P./Management through their own Representatives respectively appeared, and contested the case to

the extent the case was reserved for Award.

2.

This Reference case of all about of workman Sri Chndadeo Singh a permanent employee of Burragarh Colliery

under P.B. Area of M/s. BCCL being his Pers. No 02983146 was posted as M/Loader in the Colliery. The workman

had been successful in keeping his unblemished service track record, very sincere and efficient in the Company till he

had proceeded his native place on some emergence work since 03.01.2002 with prior information from the

Management .After having returned from the native place when he went to join duty the Management abruptly came

out the dismissal letter and handed it over to the workman citing unauthorized absence as reason behind it. Though

prior to dismissal, there was no knowledge the workman had about any charge sheet and the enquiry notices

whatsoever ever sent to the delinquent workman but the alleged order/ Notices itself contained all about at lengths,

he came across with dismissal letter. As per the principle of the natural justice equal opportunity is a pre-requisite

condition to be provided to the delinquent workman against whom an enquiry is being constituted ,so long as Shri

Chandradeo Singh, no such proceedings had been followed as stated in WS. Whereas it is a well settled law that

before dismissal of anybody the enquiry proceedings as well as notice of enquiry should be made available to the

charge sheeted workman, but in this case the Management neither did supply the enquiry proceedings nor did publish

the enquiry in local daily which is mandatory. As workers are worst hit of all, though there is absolute unanimity on

220

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

the move doubting dismissal being beneficial in the long run to Industrial Relations so the dismissal for committing

petty misconduct had shockingly a serious blow and disproportionate . The workman was worst hit being rubbed off his

livelihood in days of hardship. The Management of P.B. Area in bluntly violating the rules & regulations and the

principle of the Natural justice dismissed the workman Chandradeo Singh so the alleged act of the dismissal is

unlawful unfair and unjustified and thus is liable to be set aside ,as stated in WS.

3.

Whereas categorically denying all the allegations brought in by the Sponsoring Union/petitioner, the

Management argued by raising question over maintainability of Industrial Dispute either in law and facts as neither

the Sponsoring Union nor the workman never came up during these long span of time, i.e. thirteen years ,with any

explanations of maintaining deep rooted silence and, on that score the Reference does not qualify to stand as Industrial

Dispute rather liable to be rejected. Management further asserted that the workman concerned started absenting from

duty since 03.01.2002 unuthorizedly Since the aforesaid conduct of the workman was a misconduct under clause

26.1.1 of the Certified Standing Order of the Management thereby he deserved for alleged charge-sheet issued on

17.1.2002. Against which the workman submitted his reply which did not found satisfactory at all prompting

Management of setting up an Enquiry Committee under Enquiry Officer Sri B.R.Shukla the then Sr. Personnel

Officer as Enquiry Officer to conduct the enquiry in accordance with principle of natural justice and to ascertain to the

extent the workman committed misconduct, and to offer ample opportunity to the charge sheeted workman to defend

himself but deliberately evading for appearance turned the enquiry to declare ex-parte. The findings of the said

enquiry were also sent to the workman on his home address by Registered post. It is an extreme example of gross

negligence on the part of the workman who later on turned habitual absentee that got rooted leading to his dismissal

from service.

Since the workman concerned kept on indulging himself in absentism and turned it into habitual practice with

no sign of abating in spite of full force with which the Management did its best not to let the efforts go in vain by

slapping with stoppage of one SPRA in earlier occasion also on the same ground before resumption of duty. Thus,

neither there was any short of violation of the principle of natural justice, nor did it get mired at any stage as alleged by

the petitioner/Union rather the alleged action of dismissal against the workman stands as fair, legal and justified.

4.

So long as in relation to Group of the Collieries under the Management of M/s BCCL, a part of the Coal India

Ltd., cases like this seldom get significant where numerous cases on same footing might have been pouring in slowly

but steadily and the matter never gets more complicated when the labour forces are involved . Moreover this is not a

case of day one or two and has turned a regular feature for the years together because they are sometimes subjected to

work beyond safety norms. The workmen mostly belonging to illiteracy back ground are usually scared of stepping

into the underground Mines due to safety hazards and unhealthy conditions, surrendering in and around the site despite

best of safety mechanism/technique in place, However safety related issues have never carved out a permanent niche in

the hearts of workers. The Management and its set ups associated in such matter presents an added dimensions and

have practice to ignore the move of the such loopholes vulnerable on slightest safety omissions. Workers of the

colliery have early adopted safety norms and other safety platforms since they are simple, clean and accurate.

Governments too have made every effort to stem usage of safety norms of latest technology in collaboration with their

leading Institutions in a bid to facilitate accident free zone and to thwart accident or mishap.

There is nothing adverse report against the workman barring this one. Though alleged absentism had cost him

employment. The punishment of dismissal imposed to the misconduct against the workman shielding under the name

of penalty on ground of absentism appears to be disproportionate and a harsher to bear, and what needs above all, a

fresh outlook in view of easing out of strain in Industrial relationship.

5.

The workman concerned who was stripped of his livelihood, needs a little with breather, be provided one more

opportunity by offering him fresh appointment in the lowest Grade with two- year probation. Therefore it is ordered

that the worker concerned be appointed as fresher in the lowest Cat-I with two-year period on probation by detecting

his actual date of birth with the Service Excerpt of the Colliery before providing employment, So long as back wages,

it does not arise at all .

R. K. SARAN, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 9 tuojh] 2018

dk-vk- -—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ fVLdks

fyfeVsM ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- 1] /uckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 53@1997) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 08-01-2018

dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&20012@476@1995&vkbZvkj (lh&I)º

,e- ds- flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

221

New Delhi, the 9th January, 2018

S.O. 87.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1,

Dhanbad (Ref. No. 53 of 1997) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to

the management of M/s. TISCO Ltd. and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on

08.01.2018.

[No. L-20012/476/1995-IR (C-I)]

M. K. SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 1, DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D. Act, 1947

Reference : No. 53/1997

Employer in relation to the management of M/s. TISCO

AND

Their workman

Present : Shri R. K. Saran, Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers

:

Shri D.K. Verma, Advocate

For the workman

:

None

State : Jharkhand

Industry : Coal

Dated- 15/11/2017

AWARD

By order No. L-20012/476/1995-IR(C-I) dated 11/02/1997 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour

has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub –section (1) and sub-section (2A) of section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of M/S. TISCO in denial of employment to the dependent of

workman Shri Basudeo Turi, SDL Crew, 6 &7 Pits Colliery is justified? If not, to what relief is the

concerned workman entitled?

2.

After receipt of the reference, both parties are noticed. But appearing for certain dates by the workman none

appears subsequently. Case remains pending. It is felt that the disputes between the parties have been resolved in the

meantime. Hence No Dispute Award is passed. Communicate.

R. K. SARAN, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 9 tuojh] 2018

dk-vk- 88-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ-lh-

,y- ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- 1] /uckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 66@1992) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 29-12-2017

dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&20012@225@1991&vkbZvkj (lhe&I)º

,e- ds- flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 9th January, 2018

S.O. 88.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1,

222

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Dhanbad (Ref. No. 66 of 1992) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to

the management of M/s. ECL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 29.12.2017.

[No. L-20012/225/1991-IR (CM-I)]

M. K. SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 1, DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D. Act, 1947

Reference : No. 66/1992

Employer in relation to the management of Kapasara Area of M/s. ECL

AND

Their workmen

Present : Shri R. K. Saran, Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers

:

Shri D.K. Verma, Advocate

For the workman

:

Shri D. Mukherjee, Advocate

State : Jharkhand

Industry : Coal

Dated- 4/12/2017

AWARD

By order no . L- 20012 /225/1991 /IR (CM-1) dated 06/ 08/1992, the Central Government in the Ministry of

Labour has in exercise of the power conferred by clause (d) of sub – section ( 1) and sub – section ( 2A) of section 10

of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :

SCHEDULE

“Whether the demand of Colliery Mazdoor Sabha of India that S/Shri Radhashyam Banerjee and

others 174 being the contract Labour are required to be regularised by the Eastern Coalfields Ltd in

their establishment as well as these workers are also entitled for the benefits of NCWA-IV is justified? If

not, to what relief the workmen concerned are entitled?”

ANNEXURE

List of workmen

1. Sri Radha Shyam Banerjee

2. Sri Sanat Kumar Das

3. Sri Babesh Chandra

4. Bhubneshwar Saw

5. Dhaneshwar Saw

6. Seo Prasad Saw

7. Raj Kumar Saw

8. Brahma Murari Mahato

9. Janta Pd. Ram

10. Sukumar Das

11. Ashok Kumar

12. Balai Chakraborty

13. Sh. Niranjan Ruj

14. Utpal Rai

15. Sukant Chatterjee

16. Kanai Lal Bandopadhyay

17. Uttam Kr. Chattopadhyay

18. Jaidev Chatterjee

19. Nirmal Bhattcharjee

20. Kartik Choudhary

21. Nirmal Chtterjee

22. Hital Nag

23. Dipankar Ghosh

24. Ashim Mallick

25. Rajesh Srivastav

26. Prayag Paswan

27. Goutam Banerjee

28. Asit Chatterjee

29. Rajnath Ram

30. Alok Kr. Chakravorty

31. Asim Chakravorty

32. Ram Krishna Bhattcharjee

33. Krishna Chandra Mukherjee

34. Yusuf Hasan

35. Tapas Chandra Ghoshal

36. Tapan Kumar Mukherjee

37. Pritish Chakravorty

38. Salim Kr. Ghoshal

39. Khoku/Murli Ram Bouri

40. Satish Choudhary

41. B. Madhushudan

42. Pramod Choudhary

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

223

43. Anil Kumar

44. Parmeshwar

45. Basant Chakravorty

46. Suresh Chatterjee

47. Sish Kumar

48. Gopal Bhandari

49. Ganpat Mahto

50. Basim Murtin

51. Tapan Kr. Dutta

52. Durga Karmakar

53. Raj Kumar Lohar

54. Ranjit Lohar

55. Basudeo Mandal

56. Basant Kr. Mondal

57. Mukul Mondal

58. Subhendu Mondal

59. Rohit Kr. Mondal

60. Subhash Mondal

61. Dasrath Chandra

62. Basant Kr. Das

63. Dilip Kr. Mahato

64. Anadi Prasad Mistri

65. Ramashish Prasad

66. Krishnandu Chatterjee

67. Kajal Kr. Dey

68. Alok Banerjee

69. Kalyan Kumar Ghosal

70. Ashok Kr. Ganguly

71. Pradip Chakraborty

72. Sandip Chakraborty

73. Partha Banerjee

74. Dulal Chatterjee

75. Harsha Mazumdar

76.Ashok Kr. Chakraborty

77. Jagbandhu Banerjee

78. Dilip Kr. Roy

79. Hari Krishna Dey

80. Ravindra Nath Saha

81. Ajay Kr. Jha

82. Ashok Kr. Singh

83. Madhai Rawani

84. Bhabhotosh Bouri

85. Somnath Mukherjee

86. Probir Kumar

87. Kartik ch. Bandhopadhyay

88. Tarak Nath Chattopadhyay

89. Gunomoy Bandhopadhyay

90. Surya Roy

91. Ajit Kumar Sinha

92. Ranjit Lohar

93. Dhiren Roy

94. Anjay roy

95. Naresh Pd. Saw

96. Ganesh Chandra Gourai

97. Sasti Badyakar

98. Ashish Chandra Mallick

99. Mirinmoy Saha

100. Sadhan Pal

101. Saffiuddin Ansari

102. Subhamay Chakarvorty

103. Arvind Kumar Rawani

104. Sanjay Kr. Das Gupta

105.Parmanand Nayak

106. Pradut Kumar Das

107. Md. Salim Ansari

108. Md. Kalim Ansari

109. Mohammad Allauddin

110. Mohammed Halim Ansari

111. Subhash Kr. Dutta

112. Birendra Kr. Singh

113. Anil Kr. Singh

114. Sudam Prasad Singh

115. Ram Sanmukh singh

116. Sudhir Kr. Singh

117. Randhir Kr. Singh

118. Triloki Pandey

119. Rajiv Kumar

120. Ranjit Kr. Dutta

121. Prakash Mitra

122. Anup Mitra

123. Asit Mondal

124. Siddhanath Nirala

125. Swapan Chakravorty

126. Addyamay Dasgupta

127. Bishwanath Dasgupta

128. Madhu Bakshi

129. Salim Ansari

130. Rakesh Kr. Sinha

131. Shital Chandra Ganguly

132. Rajen Kr. Saw

133. Uday Kr. Saw

134. Suresh Kumar

135. Sadanand Bouri

136. Dip Narayan Bouri

137. Basudeo Mondal

138. Janardan Kumar

139. Narendra Pd. Singh

140. R. B. Barat

141. Ashok Kr. Singh

142. Dipak Kumar

143. Baijnath Prasad

144. Ajit Kumar Singh

145. Surendra Kr. Singh

146. Algu Ram

147. Surendra Kr. Singh

148. Manoj Kr. Singh

149. Indu Bhushan Singh

150 Rabi Shankar singh

151. Kamleshwar Upadhayay

152. Binay Kr. Singh

153. Narendra Singh

154. Ajay Singh

155. Sant lal Choudhary

156. Sunil Kr. Singh

157. Prakash Chandra Singh

158. Raj Kumar Singh

159. Ranjit Singh

160. Nagendra Pd. Singh

161. Jitendra Kumar Singh

162. Binay Kr. Upadhayay

224

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

163. Manoj Kr. Singh

164. Kailash Singh

165. Surendra Ram

166. Buchkum Singh

167. Shiv Nath Banerjee

168. Gopal Singh

169. Asim Banerjee

170. Dinesh Yadav

171. . Bijay Manjhi

172. Himanshu Chakraborty

173. Shyam Sundar Roy

174. Manas Mukherjee

175. Manas Chandra Gorai

2.

The case is received from Ministry of Labour on 12.08.1992. The Sponsoring Union files their written statement

on 01.10.1992. But after long delay the management files their written statement on 23.02.2000. Thereafter rejoinder

and document filed by the parties. Three witnesses examined on behalf of the Sponsoring Union as well as two witness

examined on behalf of the management. Documents of the management marked as M-1 to M-1/2 but no document

marked by the workman.

3.

The case of the Sponsoring Union is that the management of Kapasara Area of M/S ECL which is a public

Sector Enterprises have employed contract labour in their works for raising of Coal and overburden removal of earth

cutting, stone cutting and loading and unloading through hired heavy earth moving machineries are deployed through

the above contract Labour.

4.

It is further submitted by the Sponsoring Union is that the above action of the management of Kapasara Area of

M/S BCCL in their deployment of their workmen as contract Labour is a cloak for supressing the facts that these

workmen under contract Labour were really the workmen of the management concerned. In order to deprive them

from the status of direct employment of the management and thereby to deny them the proper wages as stipulated and

prescribed for them in the NCWA- III & IV.

5.

It is further submitted by the sponsoring union that since these workmen under the said contract labour were

receiving less wages even than an unskilled workman on the muster Roll of the management, and they were not having

paid any other benefits and emenities like provident fund, Gratuity, bonus, Privilage leave etc, they made regular

representation for their regularisation as the direct workmen of the said management which were of no avail. The union

also took up the case of these workmen for their regularisation as direct workman of the said management in

consideration of their continous employments as such so that they could get even the minium wages as prescribed for

similar nature of jobs performed by the regular workmen on the muster roll of the management. To which the

management turned a deaf ear.

6.

On the other hand the case of the management is that there is no valid Industrial dispute in the present case in

the eye of law or within the meaning of section 2 K of the I.D Act. The said persons do not come under the defination

of sec 2 (K) of I.D.Act . As a matter of fact there is no dispute and the same is fit to be dismissed. As the reference

order is vauge and suffers from the vice of total non application of mind by the Govt. and it is therefore vitiated the

particulars of the persons & details thereof are also lacking . A vague reference order is no reference order and is

rendered null & void.

7.

It is further submits that the management specifically clerarly and categorically states and submits that none of

the persons named in the list have ever been engaged by the management.

8.

It is stated by the management that the persons allotted work through open tender to supply such small number

of persons for a timited period to meet the exigency of work. It is respectfully submitted that the persons who supplies

such persons for a limited period is paid agreed amount of the work. The method of recruitment, the conditions of

service , the scale of pay & conduct Rules regulating the service conditions are governed by the statutes laid down

therein . It is settled principle of law that the employees of the management are workmen under the I.D Act.

9.

It is further submitted by the management that the petitioner have wrongly stated that the persons working under

the contract system are required to work under the management. And the management has its own regular employee

and the work through the contractor is taken casually whenever required & the same is not continuous.

10.

It is further submitted by the management that it is wholly based on misrepresentation and it represent

deliberate bid to exploit this organisation and to induct into employment illegally some outsiders through back door

method. Such prayer is also without any substance or merit quit apart from inherent legal and infirmities in the

reference order itself. The prayer of the so-called union is therefore lable to be rejected.

11.

This is the case of regularisation of 175 workmen . The case of the workmen is that they were engaged under the

management, as coal cutter in the mines. Through contractor.

12.

The dispute of regularisation was raised, more than twentyfive years ago. During that time, reference received

written statement and counter filed. Evidence of the parties also recorded long back. Purused the evidence, the

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

225

workman stated that they were contract worker under Khalsa Brothers.But the contractor has not been examined in the

case nor the contractor identified any of the workmen.

13.

In the meantime 25 years or more elapsed. It is not known as to how many workmen now alive and how many

persons crossed the age of 60 years i.e the age of superannuation. As per evidence of WW-1 he say that he was

working from 1982. In 1995 the witness of WW-2 Sri Asim Kr. Banerjee is 41 years old it means now he was 63 years

old.

14.

On purusal of the case it is found that No Identity Card, age proof, Pay slip etc filed in this case. Since the

concerned workman are not identified at this stage, this Tribunal constrained to pass award infavour of the workman.

Therefore the Tribunal is not in a position to regularise the workmen due to want of identification of the workmen.

Upon this one judgment of constitution Bench of Hon’ble Supreme Court rendered in case of SAIL- Vs National

Union Waterfront Workers reported in (2001) 7 SCC-1 says that the engagement of the contractor in the instant

work was not prohibited category of work.

15.

Considering the facts and circumstance of this case, I hold that the demand of Colliery Mazdoor Sabha of

India that S/Shri Radhashyam Banderjee and others 174 being the contract Labour are required to be regularised by the

Eastern Coalfields Ltd in their establishment as well as these workers are also entitled for the benefits of NCWA-IV is

not justified. Hence they were not entitled to get any relief.

This is my award.

R. K. SARAN, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 9 tuojh] 2018

dk-vk- 89-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ bafM;u

,;jykbal ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- 1] fnYyh ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 275@2011) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 21-12-2017

dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&11012@59@2000&vkbZvkj (lh&I)º

,e- ds- flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 9th January, 2018

S.O. 89.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1, New

Delhi (Ref. No. 275 of 2011) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to

the management of M/s. Indian Airlines and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on

21.12.2017.

[No. L-11012/59/2000-IR (C-I)]

M. K. SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE PRESIDING OFFICER: CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR

COURT No. 1: ROOM No. 511, DWARKA COURT COMPLEX, SECTOR 10, DWARKA, DELHI – 110 075

ID No. 275/2011

Smt. Kulbir Bedi,

59/124, Ajit Nagar, VIP Road,

Agra, Uttar Pradesh 282 001

…Workman

Versus

The General Manager (IR),

Indian Airlines .

IGI Airport,

New Delhi

…Management

226

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

AWARD

In the present case a reference was received vide letter No.L.11012/59/2000 (C-I) dated 29.08.2000 under

clause (d) of sub-section (1) and Section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (in short the Act) for

adjudication of an industrial disputes, terms of which are as under:

Whether the action of the management of Indian Airlines, Northern Region, New Delhi in terminating the

services of Mrs. Kulbir Bedi, Air Hostess with effect from 07.02.1995 is legal and justified? If not, to what

relief is the workman entitled?

2.

Thereafter, a corrigendum was received vide letter No.11012/59/2000-IR(C-I) dated 19.01.2015, wherein the

date of termination of the workman was to be read as ‘12.03.1996’ instead of ‘07.02.1995’.

3.

Brief facts giving rise to the present case are that Smt. Kulbir Bedi (hereinafter referred to as the claimant) was

appointed as Air Hostess with Indian Airlines (hereinafter referred to as the management ) with effect from 01.11.1976.

She has been discharging her duties sincerely and diligently and there was no complaint against her at any time and the

claimant had not availed any kind of leave except as authorized under the law and never remained absent from her

duties in an unauthorized manner.

4.

It is alleged in para 3 of the statement of claim that she fell sick on 06.09.1993 and was examined by panel

doctor of the management. She was advised complete bed rest by the doctor and intimation in this regard was sent by

way of an application, alongwith the medical certificate, to the Operations department of the management, in which the

claimant was working. Her salary was later on sanctioned by the management. The claimant was advised further

medical rest and she from to time sent requisite applications supported by medical certificates for sanction of her leave

but the management did not convey any sanction of leave for reasons best known to them despite the fact that medical

certificate was also furnished to the management. It is further alleged that on 27.02.1994 the aged mother of the

claimant who was living with her expired and the claimant was under a social obligation to perform her last rites.

When the claimant was declared fit, she reported for duties in 1994 but was not allowed to join duties on the pretest

that some disciplinary proceedings were being initiated against her. No show cause notice or memo was served on her.

She again on 07.02.1995 reported for duties but she was intimated that her services have been terminated and an

attempt was also made to hand over a cheque of Rs.7439.55 towards the alleged dues, which were not received by the

claimant earlier. No letter of termination of service was served upon the claimant. Thereafter the claimant made a

representation to the various authorities. She was highly mentally disturbed and due to family circumstances there was

nobody to look after her small children.

5.

Thereafter, claimant received a notice from National Industrial Tribunal regarding approval of her application

NTB 16 of 96 dated 05.06.1996. The claimant also filed reply to the said application under Section 33-2 of the Act and

she has objected for grant of approval of the said application of the management. However, the Tribunal vide letter

order dated 04.11.1996 while granting approval to the application of the management also permitted the claimant to

raise appropriate industrial dispute before the appropriate authority. Thereafter, she represented to the management and

conciliation also took place between the parties which virtually failed and finally reference was received in the manner

stated above from the appropriate Government for adjudication of the present dispute.

6.

Claim was contested by the management who filed reply thereto wherein certain preliminary objections was

taken. However, it was admitted that the claimant herein was removed from service vide memo dated 12.03.1996 and

appropriate Government has made reference presuming termination of the claimant from service with effect from

07.02.1995. The claimant was absent from duties with effect from 06.05.1993 on the pretext of being sick and on

06.09.1993, as stated in the statement of claimant. However, she did not get any leave sanctioned in accordance with

the relevant rules and regulations and thereafter her absence from duty which was irregular and without any sufficient

explanation was treated as misconduct. She has filed fake medical certificates. She was also asked by the management

to appear before the medical officer of the management but she did not comply with the directions. She was also

charge sheeted in terms of charge sheet dated 22.12.1993/10.01.1994 Ex.MW5/12. Claimant has not sent any reply to

the charge sheet nor participate in the domestic enquiry. Thereafter, ex-parte enquiry was conducted against the

claimant. Claimant was duly informed vide memo dated 29.07.1993 that the medical certificate furnished by here has

not been accepted by the management. Resultantly, on the basis of enquiry conducted by the Enquiry Officer, claimant

herein was removed from service and a cheque of Rs.7439.55 pertaining to her past arrears/dues was handed over to

her.

7.

Vide letter no.Z-22019/6/2007-IR-(C-II) dated 22.12.2008, the case was transferred to CGIT cum Labour Court

No.II, New Delhi for adjudication. Again vide order No.Z-22019/6/2007-IR(C-II) dated 30.03.2010 transferred the

case back to this Tribunal for adjudication.

8.

Against this factual background, my learned predecessor vide order dated 13.04.2009, framed the following

preliminary issue:

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

227

‘Whether the enquiry conducted by the management is just, fair and legal?’. If not, what orders have to be

passed in the case?’

9.

Record also shows that additional issues were also framed on 08.09.2011, as under:

(i)

Whether punishment dismissal commensurate to the misconduct of the claimant?

(ii)

In terms of reference

(iii)

Relief

10.

Both parties adduced evidence on the preliminary issue and it is clear from the record that this Tribunal vide

order dated 07.02.2013 held that the enquiry conducted by the management is not legal and fair and the same is in

violation of principles of natural justice. It was also observed that the documents filed by the management have also

not been proved during the enquiry before this Tribunal. Resultantly, this issue was decided in favour of the claimant

and against the management.

11.

Thereafter opportunity was granted to the management to adduce evidence afresh on the charge

sheet/misconduct committed by the claimant. Thereafter, management examined Ms.Prabha Devi, Dr. Kirti Suri

Verma and Shri Rajesh Seth, whose affidavits are Ex.MW3/A, Ex.MW4/A and Ex.MW5/A respectively. All these

witnesses have tendered in evidence various documents and I would be referring to these documents while drawing my

conclusions. Claimant in order to rebut the case of the management examined herself as WW1 whose affidavit is

Ex.WW1/B and also tendered in evidence certain documents.

Finding of Additional Issue No. (i), (ii) and (iii)

12.

All these issues are being taken up together for the purpose of discussion as they are interrelated and can be

conveniently disposed of. Before I proceed to consider the comparative merits of the submissions made on behalf of

either of the parties, it is necessary to delineate the charges mentioned in the charge sheet Ex.MW5/12 (also marked as

Ex.MW1/1) and the same is as under:

‘You reported sick on 06.05.1993 and since then you have neither reported back for duties nor sent any

intimation in regard to your sickness. You were advised by OM vide his letters dated 12.07.1993 and

29.07.1993 to report back for duties and advised to see the IA Medical Officer which you failed to do so. You

were also advised by IM’s letters dated 12.09.1993 and 06.10.1993 that medical certificates submitted by you

have not been accepted by our IA Medical officer, therefore, advised to see the IA Medical Officer, failing

which disciplinary action will be initiated against you. However, you failed to do so.

You are, therefore, absenting unauthorizedly with effect from 06.05.1993.

The above, if proved, would constitute an act of misconduct under the Standing Orders applicable to you, such

as:

Clause 16(6)

Absence without leave for more than 8 consecutive days or overstaying the sanctioned leave

without sufficient grounds or proper or satisfactory explanation within a week from the date

of termination of leave sanctioned.

Clause 16(8)

Breach of any Standing Order or any law or rules applicable to the establishment.

13.

Evidence of the management regarding proof of misconduct is testimony of MW3 and that of MW5. It is clear

from the overall examination of the charge sheet that the case of the management is primarily is based upon the

allegation that the claimant herein has remained absent from duties without any sanction of leave and the so called

medical certificates filed by the claimant as proof of hier illness were fake documents so as to avail leave. Admittedly

onus of proof of unauthorized absence of the claimant from duties is upon the management who is required to adduce

cogent and reliable evidence to prove the said charges against the claimant who has also furnished various documents

in the form of applications as well as medical certificates so as to show that she was really suffering from illness.

14.

It is further clear that the claimant has reported sick on 06.09.1993 and case of the management is that no

intimation was sent by the claimant to the management regarding her sickness and she was asked vide letter dated

12.07.1993 and 19.07.1994 to report back for duties. However, she has submitted medical certificate which were not

accepted by the medical officer of the management.

15.

It is also necessary to point out here that when domestic enquiry has been held by the Tribunal to be unfair and

against the principles of natural justice, in that eventuality management is required to adduce fresh evidence so as to

prove charges of misconduct against an employee. Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Neeta Kaplish vs. Presiding

Officer (1999) Lab.IC 44 while considering the question of power of Labour Court to permit adducing fresh evidence

held that under section 11-A of the Act when opportunity has been availed by the management to adduce evidence on

228

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

the charges of misconduct made against an employee, in that eventuality, evidence recorded during the course of

domestic enquiry or record pertaining to domestic enquiry would not constitute fresh evidence as all these documents

have been found by the labour court to be defective and such record would also not constitute ‘material on record

within the meaning of Section 11A of the Act as the enquiry proceedings have now been ignored altogether.

16.

Management examined Ms.Prabha Rani as MW3 who has stated that she was working in the Operations

Department where the claimant was earlier serving from 1993 to 96. She was working as Deputy Chief Airhostess

with the management and the claimant Ms.Kulbir Bedi was working under her supervision. She has also conversant

with the signature and handwriting of the claimant. She is not aware as to who was the Operations Manager in the year

1993 and she is not competent to recommend disciplinary action against the claimant. She has further deposed that

airhostesses have to report for duties as and when she has to fly and she had to remain standby at her residence also as

in case of emergency she may be called for duties. She has deposed that the claimant has submitted leave application in

1993 and her leave record for the year 1993 was in her possession, copy of which is Ex.MW3/W1. As per this

document, claimant remained on sick leave for the period 06.05.1993 to 30.09.1995. She has further deposed to a court

question that no leave in the period mentioned above was sanctioned in favour of the claimant , as such, she was on

unauthorized absence. However, she has clarified that the claimant has been sending leave applications supported by

medical certificates. Management has also doctors who attended to the employees, but she did not recollect whether

Dr. Aruna Chaudhary was one of such doctors on the panel of the management. She has further stated in her cross

examination that here medical certificate was considered by the management and her medical certificate was

considered by the management and her leave application was refused. However, she had not brought the record

pertaining to refusal of the leave application of the relevant period for the year 1992 to 1994 as well as list of panel of

doctors. She has further clarified that she is not aware as to how letter Ex.MW3/13 was sent to the claimant as matter

is more than 20 years old. She has denied Ex.ME3/2 to Ex.MW3/7 are fabricated documents. Ex.MW3/2 is letter dated

07.05.1993 written by Manager Operations and copy of the same is alleged to have been sent to Ms.Kulbir Bedi, the

claimant herein. Similarly Ex.MW3/5 dated 26.08.1993 is written by Operations Manager to Operations IANR(D)

which contains details of medical certificates sent by the claimant to the management. This letter again shows that the

medical certificate in fact was sent by the claimant regarding her illness in the year 1993 to the management.

Otherwise, there would not have been such specific mention of the same in this letter. Ex.MW3/6 is also regarding

medical certificate in respect of claimant Ms.Kulbir Bedi and the same is issued by Dr. Aruna Chaudhary. This again

shows that the claimant was sick from September 93 to 18.09.1993. There is another document Ex.MW3/7 filed by the

management regarding fitness of the claimant.

17.

MW4 Ms.Kirti Suri Verma was Senior Manager during the year 1992-95 in Indian Airlines. She has tried to

prove various documents issued under her signatures. She has admitted that there were more than 100 doctors on the

panel meant for treatment of regular employees and employees were supposed to visit the doctors on the panel for the

treatment. However, she was not in a position to produce the panel of doctors of the relevant period who were

engaged for the medical examination of the regular employees. She has clarified that Dr. Aruna Chaudhary was not

competent for long term treatment. However, she has competent to treat for short term treatment . The witness has not

shown any document as to how Dr. Aruna Chaudhary was not competent and empanelled to provide long term

treatment for ailments. She was also given time by the court to produce original of specialized doctors for treatment of

its regular employees who are suffering from such illness. However, she was not in a position to produce any record.

She has admitted that the claimant never appeared before her. She has made remarks on the backside of the medical

certificate Ex.MW4/W1 who appeared before her. She is also not aware whether the department has sent this

communication to the claimant or not as the doctors do not directly deal with the employees. She further could not

recall whether after 02.02.1993 she examined the medical certificates of the claimant or not. The claimant was

informed to report as per submission of this witness vide Ex.MW3/3. However, she has admitted that Ex.MW3/3 does

not mention that her medical certificates have been rejected for want of supporting documents. Moreover, evidence on

record regarding this communication was not sent to the claimant by the management.

18.

MW5 Shri Sanjiv Seth has also tried to support the case of the management. His deposition is broadly based on

official record. He has admitted that Ex.MW1/1 letter Ex.MW5/5, Ex,MW3/6, letter Ex.MW5/7 and Ex.MW5/6 were

never sent to the claimant. He has further deposed that Ex.MW5/4 was not sent through post to the claimant and the

same was placed in the pigeon hole/locker. He further admitted that the claimant was on sick leave with effect from

07.05.1993. A bare perusal of Ex.MW5/4 would show that Operations Manager has clearly mentioned that period of

sick leave from 29.11.1992 to 06.01.1993 and 05.10.1993 to 23.11.1993 to be treated as leave on loss of pay.

However, it is clear from the testimony of this witness that these letters were never sent/conveyed to the claimant. It is

further clear from the statement of Shri Seth MW5 that there is no proof of dispath of any of the letters mentioned

above and competent authority in respect of the claimant herein was Operations Management, as is clear from

Standing Orders Ex,MW5/16. He also stated that Ex.MW5/9 that the claimant Ms.Kulbir Bedi has signed the medical

certificate issued by Dr.Aruna Chaudhary, Dr.Vijay Verma and Shri Vijay Mehta as proof of her illness. There is

nothing on record to show that the management had rejected the aforesaid medical certificates submitted by the

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

229

claimant to the management as proof of her illness. No communication was sent to the claimant regarding rejection of

these medical certificates by the competent authority, i.e Manager Operations.

19.

At this stage, it is also appropriate to refer to the statement of MW1 Ms.Kulbir Bedi. She has filed a detailed

affidavit Ex.WW1/B in support of the stand taken in her pleadings and she has made reference to the medical

certificates Ex.WW1/1 to Ex/WW1/17. She has clearly deposed that she was on leave from 06.05.1993 to 26.02.1993

when her mother expired. She has also submitted various medical certificates to the management. She has specifically

deposed that she never received Ex.MW5/9. She had communicated to the management in the prescribed form that she

is sick from 06.05.1993. She has also furnished postal receipts regarding sending of medical certificates and other

application when she reported sick and was advised medical rest by the doctors whereas management in the present

case has not proved that any of the communication regarding rejection of her leave was either sent by post or in any

other manner to the claimant. Letter Ex.MW5/5 dated 12.07.1993 was admittedly not sent to the claimant. Similarly,

letter Ex.MW5/10 was also not sent to the claimant. Evidence regarding rejection of leave of the claimant and asking

her to report for duties has not been proved by the management. In such circumstances, it cannot be said that the

claimant was willfully and intentionally absenting from duties or that she was unauthorizedly absent from duties for the

period mentioned above. The court cannot ignore the fact that the claimant has got herself examined by Dr. Aruna

Chaudhary who is a competent doctor and on panel of the management, a fact which was not disputed even during the

course of arguments and she was initially advised rest by her. Management could not cite any rules or regulations or

show any document regarding panel of doctors from whom the claimant was legally required to get herself examined

for long term treatment. Moreover, there is no positive evidence on record tht management has not accepted medical

certificates Ex.MW4/1, Ex.MW4/2, Ex.MW4/3, Ex.MW4/4 and submitted by the claimants as proof of her illness. In

fact, evidence is suggestive of the fact that no communication in this regard was sent to the claimant. Resultantly,

absence of the claimant cannot be said to be willful or unauthorized when as per MW5 Shri Sanjeev Seth, she was on

sick leave with effect from 07.05.1993. Even this was not conveyed to the claimant.

20.

I have also gone through the various authorities relied upon by the management, i.e. Delhi Transport

Corporation Vs. Sardar Singh (AIR (2004) SC 4161). It was a case of long term absence of a conductor who remained

on leave for more than 272 days. Even in the domestic enquiry, he could not adduce any evidence so as to prove the

case of his absence. It was against this background that Hon’ble Apex Court took a view that long term absence of

such an employee is fatal. As such, his removal/dismissal from the job was held to be justified. In the case on hand, as

discussed above, the claimant has admittedly applied for leave and medical certificate was also sent regarding her

ailment by the claimant from time to time, which fact has also been admitted by the management. Moreover,

management has nowhere conveyed to the claimant that her medical certificates have not been accepted. In such

circumstances, there was no occasion for the claimant to be under the impression that she is on leave unauthorizedly,

whereas in the case relied upon by the management, notice was sent to the claimant to join duties, to which he had not

responded. This case relied upon is distinguishable and is not application to the controversy on hand.

21.

Similarly, in the case of Delhi Transport Corporation Vs Narain Singh (MANU/DE/2\4143/2013), the workman

was absent from duties and his absence was treated as leave without pay. However, later on also workman remained on

unauthorized leave for very long period, which showed lack of interest of the workman in the job and he was found to

be a habitual absentee. Workman in the said case even did not participate in the domestic enquiry, which was held ex-

parte against him. Accordingly, he was held guilty of misconduct and order of ‘removal from service’ was passed

against the workman. Since in the above case also, circumstances are clear that the workman, who was a conductor,

remained absent for more than 211 days and he neither filed any reply to the charge sheet nor did he participate in the

domestic enquiry. In such a situation, there was no escape from the conclusion that the workman was guilty.

22.

As a sequel to the above discussion, it is held that the management has failed to prove that the claimant herein

was willfully or unauthorizedly absent for the period mentioned in the charge sheet. As such, she is held to be not

guilty of the misconduct under the law. As a necessary corollary, it is held that the action of the management of Indian

Airlines, Northern Region in terminating the services of Ms.Kulbir Bedi, Air Hostess is totally illegal and unjustified.

The claimant is entitled to full back wages till the date of her retirement, i.e. 31.08.2002 and she is also entitled to all

the consequential benefits to which she was otherwise entitled had she been in the job till the date of her

retirement i.e. 31.08.2012. Further, the claimant would be entitled to all retirral benefits. An award is, accordingly,

passed. Let this award be sent to the appropriate Government, as required under Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes

Act, 1947, for publication.

Dated : December 13, 2017

A. C. DOGRA, Presiding Officer

230

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ubZ fnYyh] 10 tuojh] 2018

dk-vk- 90-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ ch-lh-

lh-,y- ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- 2] /uckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 108@2004) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 10-01-2018

dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&20012@96@2004&vkbZ-vkj- (lh&I)º

,e- ds- flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 10th January, 2018

S.O. 90.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 2,

Dhanbad (Ref. No. 108 of 2004) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation

to the management of M/s. BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 10.01.2018.

[No. L-20012/96/2004-IR (C-I)]

M. K. SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO.2), AT DHANBAD

PRESENT : Shri R.K.Saran, Presiding Officer

In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1) (d) of the I.D. Act, 1947.

REFERENCE NO. 108 OF 2004

PARTIES

:

The Vice President,

Janta Mazdoor Sangh,

Dugda Coal Washery,

PO Dugda, Distt: Bokaro-829116

Vs.

The General Manager,

Western Washery Zone of M/s BCCL,

PO: Mahuda, Dhanbad-826001.

Order No. L-20012/96/2004-IR (C-I) dt.02.09.2004.

APPEARANCES

:

On behalf of the workman/Union

:

None

On behalf of the Management

:

Mr D. K.Verma, Ld. Advocate

State : Jharkhand

Industry : Coal

Dated, Dhanbad, the 16th October, 2017

AWARD

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Sec.10(1)(d)

of the I.D. Act.,1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L-

20012/96/2004-IR (C-I) dt.02.09.2004.

SCHEDULE

Whether the demand of the Janta Mazdoor Sangh from the Management of BCCL, Western Washery Zone to

regularize Sri Hari Narayan Chouhan and Megha Lal Gope as supervisor is fair and proper? If so, to what

relief/benefit are Shri Hari Naryan Chouhan and Megha Lal Gope entitled and from what date?”

2.

Neither the Union Representative nor the workmen concerned are reported to be present on date nor let the

evidence of the workman be completed despite a fresh notice dt 12.09.2017 was sent at the address of the Union

referred in Order of the Reference itself.Mr.D.K.Verma, Ld. Advocate registered his appearance on the date not for this

time but all along since its inception and rolling out as Reference Case .The case is all about denial of the regularization

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

231

to the workmen concerned to the posts of supervisors by the Management seeking reliefs there under by staking

claim.

On perusal and close scrutiny of the case and materials on record, it has been apparently clear that the

Sponsoring Union /workmen seem to be in no hurry to produce the witness to let complete the chapter of evidence of

workman even after having availed more than six adjournments or so .The tardy pace of case over evidence of witness

appears to have paid off its own purpose as it stayed rolling out over status of producing witness since long time back.

The way, the Union Representative /petitioners walk drops points to extract the real conclusion that they are least

interested to get to finality of the case through adjudication rather appear much more inclined only for adjournments

over the times, Simultaneously the Tribunal also do not see violation of the natural justice to let the case be wrapped up

rather rolling over infinity. This also signifies status of the case, as of now, stands crawling over evidence of the

workman since 14.12.2005 with no headway in sight. As such proceedings have abruptly stalled over completion of

evidence of workman. The case appears to have lost its merits On this count, it has been viewed not to be a mute

spectator to let the situation crawl for a long spell of time rather pushing it for final closure in the line of the

principle of natural interest on presumption of non-existent of issue in real sense . So the case is wrapped up as

“No Industrial Dispute “.Accordingly an ‘Award of No Dispute’ is passed.

R. K. SARAN, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 10 tuojh] 2018

dk-vk- 91-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ ch-lh-

lh-,y- ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- 2] /uckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 82@2015) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 10-01-2018

dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&20012@100@2015&vkbZ-vkj- (lh,e&I)º

,e- ds- flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 10th January, 2018

S.O. 91.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 2,

Dhanbad (Ref. No. 82 of 2015) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to

the management of M/s. BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 10.01.2018.

[No. L-20012/100/2015-IR (CM-I)]

M. K. SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO.2), AT DHANBAD

PRESENT : Shri R.K.Saran, Presiding Officer

In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1) (d) of the I.D. Act, 1947.

REFERENCE NO. 82 OF 2015

The Secretary

PARTIES

:

Jharkhnd Janta Mazdoor Union,

Vishwakarma Colony, Nutundih

PO: Jagjivan Nagar, Dhanbad

Vs.

The General Manager,

Western Washery Zone, of M/s BCCL,

PO: Mahuda, Dhanbad.

L-20012/100/2015-IR (CM-I) dt 09.10.2015

APPEARANCES

:

On behalf of the workman/Union

:

Mr. P. Mandal, Ld. Rep.

On behalf of the Management

:

Mr. Ganesh Pd., Ld. Adv.

232

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

State : Jharkhand

Industry : Coal

Dated, Dhanbad, the 25th September, 2017

AWARD

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Sec.10(1)(d)

of the I.D. Act.,1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L-20012/

100/2015-IR(CM-I) dt 09.10.2015.

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the Management of Western Washery Zone of M/s BCCL in dismissing Sri Somar

Chouhan from the services vide office order dated 7/11.12.1997 is fair and justified? To what relief the

concerned workman is entitled to?’

On receipt of the Order No. L-20012/100/2015-IR(CM-I) dt 09.10.2015 of the above mentioned reference from

the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment, New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, the Reference

Case No. 82 of 2015 was registered on 26.10.2015 and accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue notices

through the Registered Posts to the parties concerned, directing them to appear in the Court on the date fixed, and to

file their written statements along with the relevant documents. In pursuance of the said order, notices by the Registered

Posts were sent to the parties concerned.

Both the parties made their appearances and filed their pleadings and photocopies of their documents. The

Union/Petitioner and the O.P./Management through their own Ld. Representative / Counsel appeared, and contested

the case to the extent the Reference case stands reserved .

2.

Here is the case of Ref. No. 82 of 2015 related to the workman Sri Somar Chouhan a permanent employee of

Moonidih Coal Washery of M/s BCCL by designation Driver having personnel no. 01298983 had been keeping

unblemished track record of service till he had fallen in illness due to which he could not be able to perform his duty

w.e.f. 27.1.1996 .After recovery from illness the workman concerned reported for duty to the Management with

Medical Certificate but the Management turned down his request and did not allow him to join the duty as the

workman was absent due to sickness .However the Management went one step ahead by issuing the charge sheet to

the workman on the ground of absentism on 12.03.1997, as the workman do not see misconduct being on absetism

under the provisions of the Certified Standing Order an by-laws of the Group of the Collieries of the M/s BCCL

exclusively based at Dhanbad .Though the workman submitted his reply against the said alleged charge sheet that led

to formation of Enquiry to go the bottom of the facts and, to ascertain the misconduct to the extent the workman had

committed .The Enquiry Officer in a biased and prejudiced manner conducted the whole enquiry proceedings which

may be termed unfair ,illegal and unjustified and not in the line of principle of natural justice rather came out with

guilty of the charges which culminated into much harsher punishment as dismissal by the Disciplinary Authority

throwing the workman on the verge of starvation for not fault of his own in view of the petty misconduct of absentism

which do not seem rational rather disproportionate to the alleged misconduct of absetnism, as stated by the workman in

WS .This is certainly not the kind of penalty the worker would expect from the Management. In the enquiry the

workman was held guilty of the charge for petty misconduct which is shockingly disproportionate as the dismissal

amounts to capital punishment in service arena. Post dismissal the workman made appeal to the Management to

dispose of the appeal of the workman in accordance with the provision of the Certified Standing Orders. But arbitrarily

and illegally stand the Management had so far, did not yield any consideration. The contention of the Workman was

never taken into consideration either by the Enquiry Officer or by the Disciplinary authority. The enquiry outcome is

not fair and proper and in accordance of with the principle of the natural justice as alleged by the Workman. The

workman was handed out the dismissal letter by the Project Officer of Moonidih Coal Washery on dated 7/11-12-1997.

Post dismissal the workman made an fervent appeal to the management for reinstatement but to no avail which is

dubbed a violation of the provision of the Certified Standing Order itself. The allegation - misconduct , as came out

by the Management was not established during the enquiry nor did workman’s petition for prayer take into

consideration before imposing harsher punishment of dismissal .So the alleged act of the Management about dismissal

stands unjustified and arbitrary, thereby seeking reinstatement into service with full back wages summarily.

3.

Contrary to the fact, by categorically denying and brushing aside all allegations of the Union , the

OP/Management asserted that the case is not maintainable either in law or in fact as the dispute has been fabricated

to twisty suppression and non disclosure of material facts admitting that the workman Sri Somar Chouhan was a

permanent employee of Munidih Coal Washery designated as Driver (T),as stated by the Management in its W.S., The

workman had started absenting from his duty without information, prior permission or reasonable cause since

27.01.1996,thereby committing a misconduct. The Management asserted that upon framing the said charge sheet dt.

12.03.1997 the workman was asked to reply which was received by the Management on 02.07.1997. After examining

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

233

the properly, the reply was not found satisfactory leading to formation of domestic enquiry under Shr B.K.Choubey,

then Personnel Officer and Sri T. Chakrabotry as Enquiry Officer and Management Representative respectively .The

Enquiry Officer issued notice of Enquiry to both the parties to participate in Enquiry proceedings .Though the

workman had choice by his side to keep co-worker in his defence but his denial had nothing to do with the option .

During the course of enquiry the workman was held guilty of the charges brought in against him. After conducting

enquiry the Enquiry Officer submitted report holding the workman guilty under clause 26.1.1. of the Certified Standing

Orders of the Company as the charges have been fully established without any doubt. During the course of enquiry

proceedings so long his past habitual offender on absentism had been corroborated not by Management Representative

but witness also. Further assertion that the dismissal order of the workman had not been merely singled out to one

incident alone engulfing therein the whole past track of his service record especially the poor attendances in the past

couple of years. as the workman an permanent employee under the Employer had been in the habit of remaining

absent without leave and no satisfactory cause .He had turned a habitual offender slowly but steadily .The Said act

of absentism as quoted by workman’s saying attributed to workman’s poor mental state that led to keep the

Management grappling in darkness . The Competent Authority having gone through the enquiry proceedings and its

findings and related papers fully agreed in principle and thus viewing the past conduct of his attendances and proper

application of mind, inflicted the punishment of dismissal from service which is absolutely right, the workman

deserved for .So the conduct and manner in which enquiry held never got mired at any stage . And, the dismissal of

Sri Somar Chouhan is legally justified and proportionate to the misconduct committed by him. Overall the whole the

domestic enquiry conducted by Enquiry officer is fair, proper and in accordance with the principle of natural justice.

There is nothing sort of violation of natural justice in the said enqury.

Not surprisingly , cases of absentism get insignificant , unprecedented and nothing unusual in times so long as

Groups of the Collieries under the BCCL Management are concerned as hailing illiteracy backgrounds of workmen,

mostly intent to move on prolonged leave. The Misconduct of worker in this regard often run the risk of adversely

impacting the morale of the other Workers but matter becomes much more complicated with their involvement .The

work nature seems obviously arduous and tedious apart from all time being in hale & hearty in physical structure too

to work in the hazardous atmospheres under beneath of several feets or more from the surface. The exodus of the

workers from site of working has become a major humanitarian crisis and sparked widely dissent before the

Management fraternity that still to realize that they are also part of the production and regards them an indispensable

pillar for generations. Summing up, quantum of the punishment as dismissal inflicted upon the workman concerned

against the misconduct of absentism appears a little bit harsher and not in proportionate too .So a fresh look on the

issue cannot be ruled out.

So, there is nothing improper, unlawful and wrong-doings if the workman be provided a little bit breather.

Ultimately in the light of the above, it is ordered for fresh appointment of the workman concerned as Cat. -I with

probation up to two years but no back wages, whatsoever.

R. K. SARAN, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 10 tuojh] 2018

dk-vk- 92-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ ch-lh-

lh-,y- ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- 2] /uckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 55@2014) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 10-01-2018

dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&20012@104@2014&vkbZvkj (lh,e&I)º

,e- ds- flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 10th January, 2018

S.O. 92.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 2,

Dhanbad (Ref. No. 55 of 2014) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to

the management of M/s. BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 10.01.2018.

[No. L-20012/104/2014-IR (CM-I)]

M. K. SINGH, Section Officer

234

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO.2), AT DHANBAD

PRESENT : Shri R.K.Saran, Presiding Officer

In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1) (d) of the I.D. Act, 1947.

REFERENCE NO 55 OF 2014

PARTIES

:

The Jt. Gen. Secretary,

Bahujan Mazdoor Union,

Mines Rescue Station,

PO Dhansar, Dhanbad. 828106

Vs.

The General Manager,

E.J.Area of M/s BCCL,

PO: Bhowra, Dhanbad.828302

Order No. L-20012/104/2014-IR (CM-I) dt.09.10.2014

APPEARANCES

:

On behalf of the workman/Union

:

None

On behalf of the Management

:

Mr. U.N. Lal, Ld. Advocate

State : Jharkhand

Industry : Coal

Dated, Dhanbad, the 27th October, 2017

AWARD

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Sec.10(1)(d)

of the I.D. Act.,1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L-20012/

104/2014-IR (CM-I) dt.09.10.2014.

SCHEDULE

Whether the action of the Management of Sudamdih Incline Mine of M/s BCCL in dismissing Sri Narayan

Lohar , Ex.M .Loader from the services of the Company vide office order dated 07.04.2010 is fair and justified ? To

what relief the concerned workman is entitled to?”

2.

Neither the workmen concerned nor any one from the Sponsoring Union appeared on date, nor did file the long

awaited W.S despite issuance of formal notices dt. 10.11,2014 ,09.03.2015 and ,29.06.2015 at the addresses of both the

parties concerned referred in the Order of the Reference itself barring 29.06.2015 which was sent to the Union alone.

None came out as Representative of the Management on date but was represented all along by the Ld. Adv. Mr. U.N.

Lal. The case deals with dismissal of the workmen by the Management seeking reliefs by challenging it.

On meticulously study of the record concerned it has been absolutely clear the case dates back to the year

of 2014 and it has been more than two years or so since it stands to where it was crawling one stage over the years

despite adjournment over more than ten times . It appears that the workmen’s own initiatives seem to have paid off as

the case stayed rolling out over one stage over years .This also signifies to gesture and conduct of the workman

concerned that he is no longer interested to contest to the instant case to finality through adjudication rather bent

upon to get adjournments .In real sense the case do not seem to have merits as of now , and the very existence

Industrial Dispute indeed any more appears to have ceased just because prolonged silence maintained on their part

,Usually, the Tribunal also do share the opinion of let it rolling further will be proved mere wastage of precious time

and energy and a hindrance in tackling the backlog of cases. Under these circumstances it would not amount to be

unfair, unjust and in line of violation of the natural justice if the instant case is closed on presumption of non-existent of

any Industrial Dispute as of now, between the parties concerned. Under such circumstance and facts, the case should be

closed as no-existent Industrial Dispute any longer owning to sheer disinterestedness of the Union/workman.

Accordingly “No Industrial Dispute” Award is passed.

R. K. SARAN, Presiding Officer

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

235

ubZ fnYyh] 10 tuojh] 2018

dk-vk- 93-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ lsy ds

çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- 2] /uckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 68@2015) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 10-01-2018

dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&26012@23@2015&vkbZvkj (lhe&I)º

,e- ds- flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 10th January, 2018

S.O. 93.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 2,

Dhanbad (Ref. No. 68 of 2015) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to

the management of M/s. SAIL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 10.01.2018.

[No. L-26012/23/2015-IR (CM-I)]

M. K. SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO.2), AT DHANBAD

PRESENT : Shri R.K.Saran, Presiding Officer

In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1) (d) of the I.D. Act, 1947.

REFERENCE NO. 68 OF 2015

PARTIES

:

Sri R.C. Ram,

Qr. No. 1099, Sector IX-B,

PO: Bokaro Steel City, Distt: Bokaro

Vs.

The General Manager (P & A)

SAIL, Bokaro Steel Plant,

P.O. Bokaro Steel City

Distt. Bokaro-827001.

Order No. L-26012/23/2015-IR(MI) dt. 23.09.2015

APPEARANCES :

On behalf of the workman/Union

:

None

On behalf of the Management

:

Mr. D. K. Verma, Ld. Advocate

State : Jharkhand

Industry : Steel

Dated, Dhanbad, the 3rd October, 2017

AWARD

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Sec.10(1)(d)

of the I.D. Act.,1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No.

L-26012/23/2015-IR(M) dt.23.09.2015

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the Management of SAIL /Bokaro Steel Plant in dismissing Sri R.C.Ram from

the services of the Company w.e.f. 20/11.8.2011 is fair and justified? If not, to what relief the concerned

workman entitled?”

2.

Neither the workman nor any one on behalf of the workman/petitioner is reported to be present on date nor did

file the much-awaited WS due on his part on date since long even after serving a fresh notice; whereas Mr. D.K.Verma,

LD Advocate for the Management is present. Though Notices dt.5. 9.16, and the last one posting date on 06.01.2016

236

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

were mailed to the address of the Sponsoring Union referred in the Order of the Reference itself but all went in vain

even. The Management side was also kept informed .The case is related to dismissal from the service of the workman

by the Management thereby seeking relief by challenging it.

A through and emphatically scrutiny of the case record, it transpires that the case seems to be stalled over

filing the W.S. rest with the workman for over more than two years or so. Even after stepping over the first stage,

there seems to be no urgency on the part of the workman to file the much awaited WS despite providing sufficient

times as much as more than ten times since 24.02.2016. This indicates to gesture that the workman is no more

interested to get the instant case to final adjudication fuelling speculation that the case either must have been resolved

out of Court or an issue of non-existent, as of now. Simultaneously the Tribunal do not differ over of the view of

keeping the case rolling merely for dates, is of no use rather wastage of time and energy even after adjournments for

more than seven times, finally extract the conclusion of closing down for the end of the natural justice. Under these

circumstances the case is closed; and an order of the “No Dispute Award” is passed.

R. K. SARAN, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 10 tuojh] 2018

dk-vk- 94-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ

ch-lh-lh-,y- ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- 2] /uckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 35@2016) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

10-01-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&20012@13@2016&vkbZvkj (lh,e&I)º

,e- ds- flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 10th January, 2018

S.O. 94.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 2,

Dhanbad (Ref. No. 35 of 2016) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to

the management of M/s. BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 10.01.2018.

[No. L-20012/13/2016-IR (CM-I)]

M. K. SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO.2), AT DHANBAD

PRESENT : Shri R.K.Saran, Presiding Officer

In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1) (d) of the I.D. Act, 1947.

REFERENCE NO 35 OF 2016

PARTIES

:

The Secretary,

Jharkhand Janta Mazdoor Union,

Vishwakarma Colony, Nutundih

PO: Jagjivan Nagar Dhanbad-826003

Vs.

The General Manager,

Lodna Area of M/s BCCL

PO : Khas Jeengora Dhanbad.

Ministry 's Order No L-20012/13/2016-IR(CM-I) dt 17.06.2016

APPEARANCES

:

On behalf of the workman/Union

:

Mr. P. Mandal, Ld. Rep. of the Union

On behalf of the Management

:

Mr. N.M. Kumar, Ld. Adv.

State : Jharkhand

Industry : Coal

Dated, Dhanbad, the 18th September, 2016

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 13] 2018@ikS"k 23] 1939

237

AWARD

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Sec.10(1)(d)

of the I.D. Act,1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. 20012/

13/2016-IR (CM-I) dt 17.06.2016

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the Management of Bararee Colliery of M/s BCCL in dismissing Shri Dasrath

Ravidas, Prs. No. 101837, Ex-Miner Loader from the services of the Company vide letter No. BBC/95/4450 dated

20.11.1995 is fair and justified? If not, to what relief the concerned workman is entitled?

On receipt of the Order No. L-20012/13/2016-IR(CM-I) dt 17.06.2016 of the above mentioned reference from

the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment, New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, the Reference

Case No. 35 of 2016 was registered on 22.06.2016 and accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue notices

through the Registered Posts to the parties concerned, directing them to appear in the Court on the date fixed, and to

file their written statements along with the relevant documents. In pursuance of the said order, notices by the Registered

Posts were sent to the parties concerned.

Both the parties made their appearances and filed their pleadings and photocopies of their documents. The

Union/Petitioner and the O.P./Management through their own Ld. Rep. /Counsel appeared, and contested the case.

2.

This is an another case based on footing of dismissal of the workman of Dasrath Ravidas who was a

permanent employee bearing P. No. 101837 designated as the Ex. M/Loader of Bararee Colliery under Lodna Area

under the Management of M/s BCCL, a Group of Collieries exclusively based at Dhanbad keeping unblemished track

record of service record had abruptly become sick since 16.03.1994 and started absenting but under reported it to the

Management accordingly. After recovery when from illness when the workman reported to the Management for

resumption of duty, the Management deliberately and illegally did not let him join the duty rather went one step ahead

by issuing a charge sheet to the workman on 20.07.1995 against the commission of misconduct as per the provision

under the clause of 26.1.1. of the Certified Standing Orders to which the workman replied categorically. The absent

itself is not a misconduct as stated by the workman in the WS. The workman was asked to appear before the Enquiry

Committees set up to ascertain the root cause of the absence and to go to the bottom of the fact and to the extent of the

alleged misconduct committed by the workman in which the workman concerned neither given opportunity to defend

his case nor did allow him to give full facts before the Committee as stated by the workman. Thus the enquiry itself

had been marred with violation of the natural justice and illegal. The contention of the Workman was never taken into

consideration either by the Enquiry Officer or by the Disciplinary authority. The enquiry outcome is not fair and proper

and in accordance of with the principle of the natural justice . At last the workman handed out the dismissal letter dated

20.11.1995 by the Competent Authority of the Bararee Colliery of M/s BCCL without giving an option of Second

Show Cause Notice and providing a copy of the concluded enquiry report to the workman concerned. Post dismissal

the workman made an fervent appeal to the management for reinstatement but to no avail which itself apparently a

violation of the provision of the clause 30 the Certified Standing Order. The allegations, as came out by the

Management were not established during the enquiry nor did workman’s petition for prayer take into consideration

before imposing harsher punishment of dismissal. So the alleged act of the Management about dismissal stands

unjustified and arbitrary, thereby seeking reinstatement into service summarily.

3.

It stands against the contrary to the fact that asserting by the Management at very beginning, ‘‘as the I.D. is

slate one, so the Union do not have locus-standi of raising the dispute after lapse of twenty years as of now, so the

Reference is prime facie not maintainable in-law or facts without any cause of action as claimed by the Management

categorically in its W.S. The workman concerned namely Dasrath Rabidas a permanent employee of Bararee Colliery

under Lodna Area of M/s BCCL was absenting from duty since 16.03.1994 without any information and permission

of the Management which constitutes a grave misconduct on his part of the workman. Though the workman was

framed charge sheet against his misconduct asking for reply which was not found satisfactory leading to formation of

Domestic Enquiry by Shri Lalan Pandey Dy. Personnel Manager Bararee Colliery as Enquiry Officer. The Committee

held the workman guilty of the charges brought in against him as the workman hopelessly had been failure to prove

innocence and the cause why he remained absent from duty since long without prior information and permission of the

Management. So long as second Show Cause notice was issued to the concerned workman but reply was more or less

unsatisfactory. Ultimately with the approval of the competent authority a dismissal letter had been issued to the

workman and sent at his home address but the workman knowingly and deliberately refused to receive the same.

4.

The said act on absentism on the part of the workman is attracted and termed as misconduct in accordance with

clause 26.1.1. of the Certified Standing Order, an by-laws of the Management of the M/s BCCL. Though the

Management came out with charge sheet of alleged being remained absentism for prolong period. Since reply

remained unsatisfactory, leading to formation of Departmental Enquiry to go to bottom of the fact by the

Disciplinary Authority solely in the line of the principle of natural justice. As the workman appeared before the

238

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

enquiry and submitted his reply to the said charge sheet. The issue, in quest, was referred the Domestic Enquiry to go

to the bottom of the facts and the workman was held guilty of the charges brought against him during the enquiry

proceedings. It is an extreme example of gross negligence on the part of the workman who later on turned habitual

absentee that got deep rooted leading to his dismissal from service. The alleged act of dismissal from service by the

Competent authority has been based on not merely singling out to a specific incident but taking into account the whole

aspect of past attendances during his service career and other service relevant matters, too.

Finally, the Competent Authority came forward with handing out the dismissal letter dt. 20.11.1995 only after

going through his past history of cases on absentism inclusive this one. Since the workman concerned kept on

indulging himself in absentism and turned it into habitual practice with no sign of abating in spite of full force with

which the Management did its best not to let the efforts and cohesion go in vain. Thus, neither there was any short of

violation of the principle of natural justice, nor did it get mired at any stage as alleged by the petitioner/Union rather the

alleged action of dismissal against the workman stands as fair, legal and justified.

5.

Though there is nothing unusual and unprecedented event like this one grabbing the headlines since past of

couple years as several hundred cases on the same footing happened in the Collieries earlier under the management of

BCCL, opened up the whole fiasco between Management and workers over harsher punishment inflicted upon the

workers. The work nature of the M/Loader is obviously arduous and tedious apart from the all time being in hale &

hearty in physical structure too to work in the hazardous atmospheres under beneath of several fetes or more from

the surface where quantum of oxygen sometimes reduces to drastically leading to causality or suffocation. So workman

do not hesitate to proceed on prolonged leave even on slightest pretext of reasons on one score or another before

stepping into the underground Mines despite safety mechanism in place by the Management. Notwithstanding so

much so there was no deterrent to avert the tragic accident in the Mines, and for which mostly workmen are still afraid

of. As such the move will not be called unjust and wrong-doings if the workman be provided one more opportunity to

reform himself by way of a little breather of fresh appointment.

So it is ordered for fresh appointment of the workman concerned in the lowest grade on proof of his actual

identity only with probation rolling over to two years and no back wages whatsoever.

R. K. SARAN, Presiding Officer

Uploaded by Dte. of Printing at Government of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi-110064

and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi-110054.

RAKESH

SUKUL

Digitally signed by

RAKESH SUKUL

Date: 2018.02.26

19:37:12 +05'30'