677 GI/2018

(1493)

jftLVªh la- Mh- ,y- (,u) 04@0007@2003µ05

REGD. No. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05

izkf/dkj ls izdkf'kr

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

lkIrkfgd

WEEKLY

la- 7]

ubZ fnYyh] iQjojh 11—iQjojh 17] 2018] 'kfuokj@ek?k 22—ek?k 28] 1939

No. 7]

NEW DELHI, FEBRUARY 11—FEBRUARY 17, 2018, SATURDAY/ MAGHA 22—MAGHA 28, 1939

bl Hkkx esa fHkUu i`"B la[;k nh tkrh gS ftlls fd ;g i`Fkd ladyu ds :i esa j[kk tk lds

Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

Hkkx II—[k.M 3—mi&[k.M (ii)

PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)

Hkkjr ljdkj ds ea=kky;ksa (j{kk ea=kky; dks NksM+dj) }kjk tkjh fd, x, lkafof/d vkns'k vkSj vf/lwpuk,a

Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India

(Other than the Ministry of Defence)

िव मंालय

(िवीय सेवाएं िवभाग

िवीय सेवाएं िवभाग

िवीय सेवाएं िवभाग)

नई दली, 15 फरवरी, 2018

का.आ

का.आ. 276

. 276

. 276.—प शन िनिध िविनयामक और िवकास ािधकरण अिधिनयम, 2013 (2013 का 23) क धारा 4 ारा द! त

शि#य$ का योग करते (ए, के* +ीय सरकार, एतद् ारा, ,ी सुितम बंधोपा0याय (ज*म ितिथ 17.01.1958) को पदभार 3हण करने

क तारीख से पांच वष8 क अविध के िलए अथवा 62 वष8 क आयु पूरी होने तक अथवा अगले आदेश$ तक, इनम से जो भी पहले हो,

प शन िनिध िविनयामक और िवकास ािधकरण (पीएफआरडीए) म पूण8कािलक सद=य (िव>) के पद पर िनयु# करती है।

[फा.सं. 190201/1/2014–पीआर]

मुदता िम,ा, िनदेशक

1494

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 17, 2018/MAGHA 28, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

MINISTRY OF FINANCE

(Department of Financial Services)

New Delhi, the 15^th February, 2018

S.O. 276.—In exercise of powers conferred by Section 4 of the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development

Authority Act, 2013 (23 of 2013), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Supratim Bandopadhyay (D.O.B.

17.01.1958) as a Whole-Time Member (Finance) in the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority

(PFRDA) for a period of five years from the date on which he enters upon his office, or till the age of 62 years, or until

further orders, whichever is the earliest.

[F.No. 190201/1/2014-PR]

MUDITA MISHRA, Director

उपभोा मामले, खा और सावजिनक िवतरण मंालय

(उपभोा मामले िवभाग)

(भारतीय मानक यूरो

भारतीय मानक यूरो

भारतीय मानक यूरो)

नई द ली, 6 फरवरी, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ. 277

277

277.—भारतीय मानक ?यूरो (माणन) िविनयम 1988 के िविनयम 4 के उपिनयम (5) के अनुसरण म भारतीय मानक

?यूरो एतद् ारा अिधसूिचत करता है क िजन लाइस स$ के िववरण नीचे अनुसूची म दए गए ह@, वे =वीकृत कर दए गए ह@:-

अनुसूची

सं.

लाइस स सं

=वीकृत करने

क ितिथ वष8/

माह

लाइस सधारी का नाम व पता

भारतीय मानक का शीष8

भा मा सं (भाग/

अनुभाग) : वष8

6500028606

20171003

मेसस8 लDमी इलिEFकल GायHस िलिमटेड

504, अिवनािश रोड, पीलामेडु,

कोयJब>ूर – 641 004

ऊजा8 दL ेरक मोटर –

तीन फेजीय, ि=Mरल केज

IS 12615 :

2011

6500028707

20171011

मेसस8 फामOEस पाइप ोडEQस

4/197A, बोडीपालयम पो=ट, मदुSरै,

कोयJब>ूर– 641 105

पेयजल आपूUत के िलए उW

घन!व वाले पॉलीएिथलीन

पाइZस

IS 4984 :

2016

6590002416

20171024

मेसस8 तेजस

सं. 114, 11^वाँ Bॉस सडक,

टाटाबाद, गाँधीपुरम,

कोयJब>ूर – 641 012

= वण8 एवं = वण8 िम,धातुएं,

आभूषण/ िश पकारी –

शु[ता एवं मुहरांकन

IS 1417 :

2016

6590002517

20171027

मेसस8 तेजस

सं. 114, 11^वाँ Bॉस सडक,

टाटाबाद, गाँधीपुरम,

कोयJब>ूर – 641 012

चाँदी एवं चाँदी िम,धातुएं,

आभूषण/ िश पकारी –

शु[ता एवं मुहरांकन

IS 2112 :

2014

[सं. सीएमडी/13 : 11]

टी. कलैवाणन, वै]ािनक ‘जी’ एवं मुख

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 17] 2018@ek?k 28] 1939

1495

MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

(Department of Consumer Affairs)

(BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS)

New Delhi, the 6th February, 2018

S.O. 277.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (5) of the regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards

(Certification) Regulation 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies the grant of licence particulars of

which are given in the following schedule:

SCHEDULE

Sl.

No.

Licence No.

Grant

Date

Name and Address (Factory) of

the Party

Title of the Standard

IS No. Part/

Sec. Year

6500028606

20171003

M/s. Lakshmi Electrical Drives

Limited,

504, Avinashi Road,

Peelamedu,

Coimbatore – 641 004

Energy Efficient Induction

Motors-

Three Phase, Squirrel Cage

IS 12615 : 2011

6500028707

20171011

M/s. Farmex Pipe Products

4/197A, Bodipalayam Post,

Madhukkarai,

Coimbatore – 641 105

High Density Polyethylene

Pipes for potable water

supplies

IS 4984 : 2016

6590002416

20171024

M/s. Tejas,

No. 114, 11^th Cross Street,

Tatabad, Gandhipuram,

Coimbatore – 641 012

Gold and Gold Alloys,

Jewellery/ Aertefacts-

Fineness and Marking

IS 1417 : 2016

6590002517

20171027

M/s. Tejas,

No. 114, 11^th Cross Street,

Tatabad, Gandhipuram,

Coimbatore – 641 012

Silver and Silver Alloys,

Jewellery/ Aertefacts-

Fineness and Marking

IS 2112 : 2014

[No. CMD/13:11]

T. KALAIVANAN, Scientist ‘G’ & Head

नई द ली, 6 फरवरी, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ. 278

278

278.—भारतीय मानक ?यूरो (माणन) िविनयम 1988 के िविनयम 4 के उपिनयम (5) के अनुसरण म भारतीय मानक

अनुसूची

सं.

लाइस स सं

=वीकृत करने

क ितिथ वष8/

माह

लाइस सधारी का नाम व पता

भारतीय मानक का शीष8

भा मा सं (भाग/

अनुभाग) : वष8

6500028808

20171103

मेसस8 लDमी वायर इंड=Fीस यूिनट 2

SF 451/2, सी आर पी एफ रोड,

कदरनायकनपालयम, कोयJब>ूर –

641 017

1100 वो ट तक काय8कारी

वो टता के िलए पी वी सी

रोिधत केबल

IS 694 : 2010

6590002618

20171106

मेसस8 लिलता तंगा मािलगै

18, नयू माकO ट =Fीट,

ित^Zपुर – 641 604

= वण8 एवं = वण8 िम,धातुएं,

आभूषण/ िश पकारी –

शु[ता एवं मुहरांकन

IS 1417 : 2016

1496

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 17, 2018/MAGHA 28, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

6500028909

20171107

मेसस8 वाटरटेक (इंिडया) ायवेट

िलिमटड यूिनट II

पडुवमपली गाँव, वगारयमपालयम

पो=ट,

सुलूर तालुक, कोयJब>ूर – 641 659

पेय जल पूUत के िलए

असुघि_त पी वी सी

पाइप

IS 4985 : 2000

6500029010

20171113

मेसस8 अ=वा पJZस

397-C, के.जी. लेऔट, पीलमेडू,

कोयJब>ूर– 641 004

गहरे कु` के िलए

िनJमजनीय पJपसेट

IS 14220 : 1994

6500029111

20171124

मेसस8 िवजया िशवा िमनरल एMा

फाम8

सं: 26, परायमकाQटु वलसु,

पसुवापaी पो=ट, चेिbमलै ?लॉक,

पे^*दुरै तालुक,

ईरोड - 638051

पैकेजबंद पेय जल

(पैकेजबंद िमनरल जल के

अलावा)

IS 14543 : 2016

6590002719

20171127

मेसस8 रJयम cवेलरी माट8

38, तडागम रोड, वेला*डीपालयम,

कोयJब>ूर – 641 025

= वण8 एवं = वण8 िम,धातुएं,

आभूषण/ िश पकारी –

शु[ता एवं मुहरांकन

IS 1417 : 2016

6590002820

20171127

मेसस8 रJयम cवेलरी माट8

38, तडागम रोड, वेला*डीपालयम,

कोयJब>ूर – 641 025

चाँदी एवं चाँदी

िम,धातुएं, आभूषण/

िश पकारी – शु[ता एवं

मुहरांकन

IS 2112 : 2014

[सं. सीएमडी/13 : 11]

टी. कलैवाणन, वै]ािनक ‘जी’ एवं मुख

New Delhi, the 6th February, 2018

S.O. 278.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (5) of the regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards

(Certification) Regulation 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies the grant of licence particulars of

which are given in the following schedule:

SCHEDULE

Sl.

No.

Licence No.

Grant

Date

Name and Address (Factory) of the

Party

Title of the Standard

IS No. Part/

Sec. Year

6500028808

20171103

M/s. Lakshmi Wire Industries Unit 2

SF451/2, CRPF Road,

Kathirnaickanpalayam,

Coimbatore – 641 017

PVC Insulated cables for

working voltages upto and

including 1100 V

IS 694 : 2010

6590002618

20171106

M/s. Lalitha Thanga Malikai

18, New Market Street,

Tirupur – 641 604

Gold and Gold Alloys,

Jewellery/Artefacts -

Fineness and Marking -

Specification

IS 1417 :

2016

6500028909

20171107

M/s. Watertec (India) Private

Limited-Unit.II

Paduvampalli Village,

Vagarayampalayam Post,

Sulur Taluk,

Coimbatore – 641 659

Unplasticized PVC Pipes

for Potable Water Supplies

- Specification

IS 4985 :

2000

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 17] 2018@ek?k 28] 1939

1497

6500029010

20171113

M/s. Asvaa Pumps

397-C, K.G. Layout,

Peelamedu,

Coimbatore – 641 004

Openwell Submersible

Pumpsets - Specification

IS 14220 :

1994

6500029111

20171124

M/s. Vijaya Shiva Mineral Aqua

Farm

No:26, Parayankattu

Valasu,Pasuvapatti Post,

Chennimalai Block, Perundurai Tk,

Erode - 638051

Packaged Drinking Water

(other than Packaged

Natural Mineral Water) -

Specification

IS 14543 :

2016

6590002719

20171127

M/s. Ramyam Jewellery Mart,

38, Thadagam Road,

Velandipalayam,

Coimbatore – 641 025

Gold and Gold Alloys,

Jewellery/Artefacts -

Fineness and Marking -

Specification

IS 1417 :

2016

6590002820

20171127

M/s. Ramyam Jewellery Mart,

38, Thadagam Road,

Velandipalayam,

Coimbatore – 641 025

Silver and Silver Alloys,

Jewellery/Artefacts -

Fineness and Marking -

Specification

IS 2112 :

2014

[No. CMD/13:11]

T. KALAIVANAN, Scientist ‘G’ & Head

नई द ली, 6 फरवरी, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ. 279

279

279.—भारतीय मानक ?यूरो (माणन) िविनयम 1988 के िविनयम 4 के उपिनयम (5) के अनुसरण म भारतीय मानक

अनुसूची

सं.

लाइस स सं

=वीकृत करने

क ितिथ वष8/

माह

लाइस सधारी का नाम व पता

भारतीय मानक का शीष8

भा मा सं (भाग/

अनुभाग) : वष8

6500029212

20171201

मेसस8 मोयलन ए3ो पाइZस

एस एफ 183/2, करयनचेaी पालयम,

वालपारै मुeय सडक, समतूर पो=ट,

कोयJब>ूर – 642 123

बोर/ नलकूप$ के िलए

अनJयकृत पी वी सी जाली

और आवरक पाइप

IS 12818 :

2010

6590002913

20171204

मेसस8 तारा cवेलरी

61, िव*+ा आकOड,

पिfम बgयाकरलु सडक, आर एस पुरम,

कोयJब>ूर– 641 002

= वण8 एवं = वण8 िम,धातुएं,

आभूषण/ िश पकारी –

शु[ता एवं मुहरांकन

IS 1417 :

2016

6500029305

20171207

मेसस8 सेज़र इलEFोिनEस िलिमटड

यूिनट III

एस एफ सं. 671/1, सं 2. गूडलूर गाँव,

सािमचेaीपालयम, कोयJब>ूर-641047

250 वोट तक क रेiटत

वोटता वाले और 16

एJपीयर तक क रेiटत

करंट वाले Zलग और सॉकेट

िनकास

IS 1293 :

2005

6590003115

20171208

मेसस8 जी आर टी cवेलस8 (इंिडया) ायवेट

िलिमटड

381-384, पोbै वीधी, Bॉस कट रोड,

कोयJब>ूर – 641 012

= वण8 एवं = वण8 िम,धातुएं,

आभूषण/ िश पकारी –

शु[ता एवं मुहरांकन

IS 1417 :

2016

6590003014

20171208

मेसस8 ,ी cवेलरी

41/9, पुराना बस अjा रोड, पे^*दुरै,

ईरोड – 638 052

= वण8 एवं = वण8 िम,धातुएं,

आभूषण/ िश पकारी –

शु[ता एवं मुहरांकन

IS 1417 :

2016

1498

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 17, 2018/MAGHA 28, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

6500029406

20171208

मेसस8 =टे*डड8 इजीिनयkरग इंड=Fीस

एस एफ सं. 88/86, इल*गो नगर,

के. आर. पुरम, आवारमपालयम,

कोयJब>ूर – 641 006

िनJमजनीय पJपसेट

IS 8034 :

2002

6500029709

20171214

मेसस8 के=केडा एंटरायसेस

एस एफ सं. 456/1, ितपली मेटु तोaम,

नीलJबूर बै-पास रोड, रावतुर रोड,

इ^गुर,

कोयJब>ूर – 641 103

पैकेजबंद पेय जल

(पैकेजबंद िमनरल जल के

अलावा)

IS 14543 :

2016

6500029507

20171214

मेसस8 आकl ओटोमेशन

18-C, िसFा रोड, कालापaी,

कोयJब>ूर - 641048

साफ, ठंडे पानी के िलए

अपक +ीय पुन^!पादक पJप

IS 8472 :

1998

6500029608

20171214

मेसस8 के एन पJZस

S-9, इल*गो नगर, आवारमपालयम,

गणपित पो=ट,

कोयJब>ूर – 641 006

साफ, ठंडे पानी के िलए

अपक +ीय पुन^!पादक पJप

IS 8472 :

1998

10.

6590003317

20171222

मेसस8 जोित,ी cवेलरी

127, पी वी कोइल सडक,

उडुमलपेट – 642 126

= वण8 एवं = वण8 िम,धातुएं,

आभूषण/ िश पकारी –

शु[ता एवं मुहरांकन

IS 1417 :

2016

11.

6590003216

20171222

मेसस8 जॉयआलुSास इंिडया ायवेट

िलिमटड

सं. 89, कॉवेरी रोड, क^*गलपालयम,

ईरोड – 638 003

= वण8 एवं = वण8 िम,धातुएं,

आभूषण/ िश पकारी –

शु[ता एवं मुहरांकन

IS 1417 :

2016

12.

6590003418

20171222

मेसस8 सन िसवस8

20, डाली रोड,

उडुमलपेट – 642 126

= वण8 एवं = वण8 िम,धातुएं,

आभूषण/ िश पकारी –

शु[ता एवं मुहरांकन

IS 1417 :

2016

[सं. सीएमडी/13 : 11]

टी. कलैवाणन, वै]ािनक ‘जी’ एवं मुख

New Delhi, the 6th February, 2018

S.O. 279.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (5) of the regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards

(Certification) Regulation 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies the grant of licence particulars of

which are given in the following schedule:

SCHEDULE

Sl.

No.

Licence No.

Grant

Date

Name and Address (Factory) of the

Party

Title of the Standard

IS No. Part/

Sec. Year

6500029212

20171201

M/s. Moyalan Agro Pipes

SF 183/2, Karayanchetti Palayam,

Valpari Main Road , Samathur

(P.O.),

Coimbatore – 642 123

Specification for

unplasticized PVC screen

and casing pipes for

bore/tubewell

IS 12818 :

2010

6590002913

20171204

M/s. Tara Jewellery

61, Vindra Arcade,

West Bashyakarlu Road, R.S. Puram,

Coimbatore – 641 002

Gold and Gold Alloys,

Jewellery/Artefacts -

Fineness and Marking -

Specification

IS 1417 :

2016

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 17] 2018@ek?k 28] 1939

1499

6500029305

20171207

M/s. Salzer Electronics Limited Unit

III

SF.No.671/1, No.2.Gudalur Village,

Samichettipalayam,

Coimbatore-641047

Plugs and socket outlets of

250 volts and rated current

up to 16 amperes

IS 1293 :

2005

6590003115

20171208

M/s. GRT Jewellers (India) Pvt. Ltd.

381-384, Ponnay Veedhi,

Cross Cut Road,

Coimbatore – 641 012

Gold and Gold Alloys,

Jewellery/Artefacts -

Fineness and Marking -

Specification

IS 1417 :

2016

6590003014

20171208

M/s. Sri Jewellery

41/9, Old Bus Stand Road,

Perundurai,

Erode – 638 052

Gold and Gold Alloys,

Jewellery/Artefacts -

Fineness and Marking -

Specification

IS 1417 :

2016

6500029406

20171208

M/s. Standard Engineering Industries

SF No 88/86, Elango Nagar

K R Puram, Avarampalayam,

Coimbatore – 641 006

Submersible Pumpsets -

Specification

IS 8034 :

2002

6500029709

20171214

M/s. Cascada Enterprises

SF No. 456/1, Thipli Mettu Thottam,

Neelambur Bypass Road,

Ravathur Road, Irugur,

Coimbatore – 641 103

Packaged Drinking Water

(other than Packaged

Natural Mineral Water) -

Specification

IS 14543 :

2016

6500029507

20171214

M/s. Aarco Automation

18-C, Sitra Road,

Kalapatti,

Coimbatore - 641048

Centrifugal Regenerative

Pumps for clear, cold water

IS 8472 :

1998

6500029608

20171214

M/s. K N Pumps

S-9, Elango Nagar, Avarampalayam,

Ganapathy Post,

Coimbatore – 641 006

Centrifugal Regenerative

Pumps for clear, cold water

IS 8472 :

1998

10.

6590003317

20171222

M/s. Jothisree Jewellery

127, P.V. Koil Street,

Udumalpet – 642 126

Gold and Gold Alloys,

Jewellery/Artefacts -

Fineness and Marking -

Specification

IS 1417 :

2016

11.

6590003216

20171222

M/s. Joyalukkas India Private

Limited

No. 89, Cauvery Road,

Karungalpalayam,

Erode – 638 003

Gold and Gold Alloys,

Jewellery/Artefacts -

Fineness and Marking -

Specification

IS 1417 :

2016

12.

6590003418

20171222

M/s. Sun Silvers

20, Dhali Road,

Udumalpet – 642 126

Gold and Gold Alloys,

Jewellery/Artefacts -

Fineness and Marking -

Specification

IS 1417 :

2016

[No. CMD/13:11]

T. KALAIVANAN, Scientist ‘G’ & Head

1500

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 17, 2018/MAGHA 28, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

नई द ली, 6 फरवरी, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ. 280

280

280.—भारतीय मानक ?यूरो (माणन) िविनयम 1988 के िविनयम 4 के उपिनयम (5) के अनुसरण म भारतीय मानक

अनुसूची

सं.

लाइस स सं

=वीकृत करने

क ितिथ वष8/

माह

लाइस सधारी का नाम व पता

भारतीय मानक का शीष8

भा मा सं (भाग/

अनुभाग) : वष8

6590003519

20180103

मेसस8 वी एम तंगा मािलगै

6/6A, कोवै मुeय सडक,

शि# िवनायगर मंदर बस अjे के सामने,

मेटूपालयम – 641 301

= वण8 एवं = वण8 िम,धातुएं,

आभूषण/ िश पकारी –

शु[ता एवं मुहरांकन

IS 1417 :

2016

6590003713

20180104

मेसस8 सुम*गली cवेलस8

318, राजा =Fीट, पहला माला,

कोयJब>ूर – 641 001

चाँदी एवं चाँदी

िम,धातुएं, आभूषण/

िश पकारी – शु[ता एवं

मुहरांकन

IS 2112 :

2014

6500029810

20180104

मेसस8 जयशि# िमनरस

15/12B, अ*जुवलाकाडु, संगरा गौ*डन

पालयम,

वरतनलूर, भवानी,

ईरोड – 638 311

पैकेजबंद पेय जल

(पैकेजबंद िमनरल जल के

अलावा)

IS 14543 :

2016

6590003620

20180104

मेसस8 ,ी अbै cवेस

103-A, एन एस आर रोड,

साईबाबा कॉलनी, कोयJब>ूर – 641

011

= वण8 एवं = वण8 िम,धातुएं,

आभूषण/ िश पकारी –

शु[ता एवं मुहरांकन

IS 1417 :

2016

6500029911

20180108

मेसस8 काश एMा इंड=Fीस

166/1G, वेटैकारन कोिवल के पास,

तो*डामुतुर, मादमपaी (पो=ट),

कोयJब>ूर-641010

पैकेजबंद पेय जल

(पैकेजबंद िमनरल जल के

अलावा)

IS 14543 :

2016

6590003814

20180111

मेसस8 आर वी cवेलस8

442, िबग बज़ार =Fीट,

कोयJब>ूर – 641 001

= वण8 एवं = वण8 िम,धातुएं,

आभूषण/ िश पकारी –

शु[ता एवं मुहरांकन

IS 1417 :

2016

6500030092

20180111

मेसस8 अजु8ना पॉली एE=oशन

1/140, पूलाकQटुपालयम,

गौ*डमपालयम, अिवनािश,

ित^Zपुर – 641654

िवpुत ितqापन के िलए

वािहका– भाग 3– सeत

एवं सादा िवpुत अवरोधी

वािहका

IS 9537 :

Part 3 : 1983

6590003915

20180111

मेसस8 मुलै cवेलस8

68, 7^वाँ =Fीट, टाटाबाद,

गाँधीपुरम,

कोयJब>ूर- 641012

= वण8 एवं = वण8 िम,धातुएं,

आभूषण/ िश पकारी –

शु[ता एवं मुहरांकन

IS 1417 :

2016

6590004016

20180111

मेसस8 मुलै cवेलस8

66 E & F, डॉ आर वी टावस8,

वी सी टी वी मुeय सडक, कमUशयल

काJZलेEस, ईरोड - 638011

= वण8 एवं = वण8 िम,धातुएं,

आभूषण/ िश पकारी –

शु[ता एवं मुहरांकन

IS 1417 :

2016

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 17] 2018@ek?k 28] 1939

1501

10.

6590004117

20180111

मेसस8 मुलै cवेलस8

68, 7^वाँ =Fीट, टाटाबाद,

गाँधीपुरम,

कोयJब>ूर- 641012

चाँदी एवं चाँदी

िम,धातुएं, आभूषण/

िश पकारी – शु[ता एवं

मुहरांकन

IS 2112 :

2014

11.

6590004218

20180111

मेसस8 मुलै cवेलस8

66 E & F, डॉ आर वी टावस8,

वी सी टी वी मुeय सडक, कमUशयल

काJZलेEस, ईरोड - 638011

चाँदी एवं चाँदी

िम,धातुएं, आभूषण/

िश पकारी – शु[ता एवं

मुहरांकन

IS 2112 :

2014

12.

6500030193

20180112

मेसस8 ,ी जे एम डी इंड=Fीस

एस एफ सं.429B, तbीर प*दल,

पीलमेडु,

कोयJब>ूर - 641004

साफ, ठंडे पानी के िलए

अपक +ीय पुन^!पादक पJप

IS 8472 :

1998

13.

6500030294

20180112

मेसस8 वUशनी इंड=Fीस

2/38, काटूर =Fीट, कालापaी,

कोयJब>ूर-641048

साफ, ठंडे पानी के िलए

अपक +ीय पुन^!पादक पJप

IS 8472 :

1998

14.

6500030395

20180116

मेसस8 कैरा पJZस एrड िस=टम

66, 4^th Bॉस, इल*गो नगर,

आवारमपालयम, गणपित,

कोयJब>ूर-641006

साफ, ठंडे पानी के िलए

अपक +ीय पुन^!पादक पJप

IS 8472 :

1998

15.

6500030496

20180116

मेसस8 ए3ो पJZस

1/451-A3, मुडिलपालयम,

मुतुगौ*डनपुदुर पो=ट, सुलूर तालुक,

कोयJब>ूर - 641407.

गहरे कु` के िलए

िनJमजनीय पJपसेट

IS 14220 :

1994

16.

6500030597

20180116

मेसस8 अbा पJZस

80-C, कामाधेनु नगर, आवारमपालयम,

कोयJब>ूर - 641006.

गहरे कु` के िलए

िनJमजनीय पJपसेट

IS 14220 :

1994

17.

6500030698

20180125

मेसस8 धरनी stफग Zल ट (ा) िलिमटड

236/2, ऊरQटुकुZपै गाँव,

मदुSरै (तालुक), चेaीपालयम,

कोयJब>ूर-641201

खोखले इ=पात के खंड

रचना!मक योग के िलए

IS 4923 :

2017

18.

6500030799

20180125

मेसस8 धरनी stफग Zल ट (ा) िलिमटड

236/2, ऊरQटुकुZपै गाँव,

मदुSरै (तालुक), चेaीपालयम,

कोयJब>ूर-641201

यांिuकय और सामा*य

इंजीिनयkरग उvेgय के

िलए इ=पात निलकाएँ

IS 3601 :

2006

19.

6500030803

20180131

मेसस8 सौमीका िमनरस

एस एफ सं. 74,75, वSननकाटु तोaम,

सी. एस. नगर के पीछे, वीरZपनचuम

(डाक),

ईरोड -638004

पैकेजबंद पेय जल

(पैकेजबंद िमनरल जल के

अलावा)

IS 14543 :

2016

[सं. सीएमडी/13 : 11]

टी. कलैवाणन, वै]ािनक ‘जी’ एवं मुख

1502

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 17, 2018/MAGHA 28, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 6th February, 2018

S.O. 280.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (5) of the regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards

(Certification) Regulation 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies the grant of licence particulars of

which are given in the following schedule:

SCHEDULE

Sl.

No.

Licence No.

Grant

Date

Name and Address (Factory) of the

Party

Title of the Standard

IS No. Part/

Sec. Year

6590003519

20180103

M/s. V M Thangamaligai

6/6A, Covai Main Road,

Sakthi Vinayagar Temple (Opp.) Bus

Stand,

Mettupalayam – 641 301

Gold and Gold Alloys,

Jewellery/Artefacts -

Fineness and Marking -

Specification

IS 1417 :

2016

6590003713

20180104

M/s. Sumangali Silvers

318, Raja Street, 1^st Floor,

Coimbatore – 641 001

Silver and Silver Alloys,

Jewellery/Artefacts -

Fineness and Marking -

Specification

IS 2112 :

2014

6500029810

20180104

M/s. Jaisakthi Mineralss

15/12B, Anjuvallakkadu,

Sangara Goundan Palayam,

Varathanallur, Bhavani,

Erode – 638 311

Packaged Drinking Water

(other than Packaged

Natural Mineral Water) -

Specification

IS 14543 :

2016

6590003620

20180104

M/s. Sree Annai Jewels

103-A, N.S.R. Road,

Saibaba Colony,

Coimbatore – 641 011

Gold and Gold Alloys,

Jewellery/Artefacts -

Fineness and Marking -

Specification

IS 1417 :

2016

6500029911

20180108

M/s. Prakash Aqua Industries

166/1G, Near Vettaikaran Kovil,

Thondamuthur, Mathampatti (P.O.),

Coimbatore-641010

Packaged Drinking Water

(other than Packaged

Natural Mineral Water) -

Specification

IS 14543 :

2016

6590003814

20180111

M/s. R.V. Jewellers

442, Big Bazaar Street,

Coimbatore – 641 001

Gold and Gold Alloys,

Jewellery/Artefacts -

Fineness and Marking -

Specification

IS 1417 :

2016

6500030092

20180111

M/s. Arjuna Poly Extrusion

1/140, Poolakattupalayam,

Goundampalayam,

Avinashi,

Tirupur-641654.

Conduits for electrical

installations: Part 3 Rigid

plain conduits of insulating

materials

IS 9537 : Part

3 : 1983

6590003915

20180111

M/s. Mullai Jewellers

68, 7^th Street, Tatabad,

Gandhipuram,

Coimbatore - 641012

Gold and Gold Alloys,

Jewellery/Artefacts -

Fineness and Marking -

Specification

IS 1417 :

2016

6590004016

20180111

M/s. Mullai Jewellers

66 E & F, Dr. R.V. Towers,

VCTV Main Road, Commercial

Complex,

Erode - 638011

Gold and Gold Alloys,

Jewellery/Artefacts -

Fineness and Marking -

Specification

IS 1417 :

2016

10.

6590004117

20180111

M/s. Mullai Jewellers

68, 7^th Street, Tatabad,

Gandhipuram,

Coimbatore - 641012

Silver and Silver Alloys,

Jewellery/Artefacts -

Fineness and Marking -

Specification

IS 2112 :

2014

11.

6590004218

20180111

M/s. Mullai Jewellers

66 E & F, Dr. R.V. Towers,

VCTV Main Road, Commercial

Complex,

Erode - 638011

Silver and Silver Alloys,

Jewellery/Artefacts -

Fineness and Marking -

Specification

IS 2112 :

2014

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 17] 2018@ek?k 28] 1939

1503

12.

6500030193

20180112

M/s. Sri J.M.D. Industries,

SF No.429B, Thanneer Pandal,

Peelamedu,

Coimbatore - 641004

Centrifugal Regenerative

Pumps for clear, cold water

IS 8472 :

1998

13.

6500030294

20180112

M/s. Varshini Industrries

2/38, Kattoor Strret, Kalapatti,

Coimbatore-641048

Centrifugal Regenerative

Pumps for clear, cold water

IS 8472 :

1998

14.

6500030395

20180116

M/s. Kyra Pumps & System

66, 4^th Cross,Elango Nagar,

Avaram Palayam, Ganapathy,

Coimbatore-641006

Centrifugal Regenerative

Pumps for clear, cold water

IS 8472 :

1998

15.

6500030496

20180116

M/s. Agro Pumps

1/451-A3, Mudalipalayam,

Muthugoundanpudur Post, Sulur Tk,

Coimbatore - 641407.

Openwell Submersible

Pumpsets - Specification

IS 14220 :

1994

16.

6500030597

20180116

M/s. Anna Pumps

80-C, Kamadenu Nagar,

Avarampalayam,

Coimbatore - 641006.

Openwell Submersible

Pumpsets - Specification

IS 14220 :

1994

17.

6500030698

20180125

M/s. Dharranee Rooffing Plant (P)

Limited

236/2,Oorattukuppai Village,

Madukkarai(Tk), Chettipalayam,

Coimbatore-641201

Hollow steel sections for

structural use

IS 4923 :

2017

18.

6500030799

20180125

M/s. Dharranee Rooffing Plant (P)

Limited

236/2,Oorattukuppai Village,

Madukkarai(Tk), Chettipalayam,

Coimbatore-641201

Steel tubes for mechanical

and general engineering

purposes

IS 3601 :

2006

19.

6500030803

20180131

M/s. Sowmika Minerals

SF No. 74,75, Vakkanankattu

Thottam,

C. S. Nagar Back Side,

Veerappanchatram (Post) ,

Erode -638004

Packaged Drinking Water

(other than Packaged

Natural Mineral Water) -

Specification

IS 14543 :

2016

[No. CMD/13:11]

T. KALAIVANAN, Scientist ‘G’ & Head

नई द ली, 6 फरवरी, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ. 281

281

281.— भारतीय मानक ? यूरो (माणन) िविनयम, 1988 के िविनयम (5) के उपिविनयम (6) के अनुसरण म भारतीय

मानक ? यूरो एतx ारा अिधसूिचत करता है क िनJ न िववरण वाले लाइस स$ को उनके आगे दशा8यी गई तारीख से रद्द /= थिगत कर

दया गया है :-

अनुसूची

सं.

लाइस स सं

सी एम/

एल-

लाइस सधारी का नाम व पता

=थिगत कए गए/ रv कए गए लाइस स के

अंतग8त व=तु/ Bम सJब[ भारतीय मानक का

शीष8क

रv होने क

ितिथ

4658681

मेसस8 सी आर मोटस8 ाइवेट िलिमटेड

79/2, दूसरा माला, के सी आकOड,

टी. वी. =वामी रोड, आर एस पुरम,

कोयJब>ूर -641002

IS 12615 : 2011

ऊजा8 दL ेरक मोटर – तीन फेजीय, ि=Mरल केज

19/10/2017

[सं. सीएमडी/13:13]

टी. कलैवाणन, वै]ािनक ‘जी’ एवं मुख

1504

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 17, 2018/MAGHA 28, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 6th February, 2018

S.O. 281.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (6) of the regulation 5 of the Bureau of Indian Standards

(Certification) Regulations 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies that the licence particulars of

which are given below have been cancelled/suspended with effect from the date indicated against each:

SCHEDULE

Sl.

No.

Licence No.

CM/L-

Name & Address of the Licensee

Article/ Process with relevant

Indian Standard covered by the

licence cancelled/ suspension

Date of

Cancellation

4658681

M/s. CR MOTORS PRIVATE LIMITED

79/2, II FLOOR, K.C. ARCADE,

T.V. SAMY ROAD, R.S. PURAM,

COIMBATORE-641002

IS 12615 : 2011

Induction Motors – Energy

Efficient, Three-Phase, Squirrel

Cage

19/10/2017

[No. CMD/13:13]

T. KALAIVANAN, Scientist ‘G’ & Head

नई द ली, 6 फरवरी, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ. 282

282

282.— भारतीय मानक ? यूरो (माणन) िविनयम, 1988 के िविनयम (5) के उपिविनयम (6) के अनुसरण म भारतीय

मानक ? यूरो एतद् ारा अिधसूिचत करता है क िनJ न िववरण वाले लाइस स$ को उनके आगे दशा8यी गई तारीख से रद्द /= थिगत कर

दया गया है :-

अनुसूची

सं.

लाइस स सं

सी एम/ एल-

लाइस सधारी का नाम व पता

=थिगत कए गए/ रv कए गए लाइस स के

अंतग8त व=तु/ Bम सJब[ भारतीय मानक का

शीष8क

रv होने क

ितिथ

6500006297

मेसस8 ईशा Eलॉzथग

14/93-A 7, गाँधी =Fीट, अिवनािश ?लॉक,

राSै{या पालयम, अिवनािश तालुक,

ित^Zपुर -641654

IS 14543 : 2004

पैकेजबंद पेय जल (पैकेजबंद िमनरल जल के

अलावा)

09/11/2017

[सं. सीएमडी/13:13]

टी. कलैवाणन, वै]ािनक ‘जी’ एवं मुख

New Delhi, the 6th February, 2018

S.O. 282.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (6) of the regulation 5 of the Bureau of Indian Standards

(Certification) Regulations 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies that the licence particulars of

which are given below have been cancelled/suspended with effect from the date indicated against each:

SCHEDULE

Sl.

No.

Licence No.

CM/L-

Name & Address of the Licensee

Article/ Process with relevant

Indian Standard covered by the

licence cancelled/ suspension

Date of

Cancellation

6500006297

M/s. ISHA CLOTHING

14/93-A 7, GANDHI STREET,

AVINASHI BLOCK, RAKKIYA

PALAYAM, AVINASHI TALUK,

TIRUPUR -641654

IS 14543 : 2004

Packaged Drinking Water (Other

Than Packaged Natural Mineral

Water)

09/11/2017

[No. CMD/13:13]

T. KALAIVANAN, Scientist ‘G’ & Head

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 17] 2018@ek?k 28] 1939

1505

नई द ली, 6 फरवरी, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ. 283

283

283.— भारतीय मानक ? यूरो (माणन) िविनयम, 1988 के िविनयम (5) के उपिविनयम (6) के अनुसरण म भारतीय

मानक ? यूरो एत|ारा अिधसूिचत करता है क िनJ न िववरण वाले लाइस स$ को उनके आगे दशा8यी गई तारीख से रद्द /= थिगत कर दया

गया है :-

अनुसूची

सं.

लाइस स सं

सी एम/

एल-

लाइस सधारी का नाम व पता

=थिगत कए गए/ रv कए गए लाइस स के

अंतग8त व=तु/ Bम सJब[ भारतीय मानक का

शीष8क

रv होने क

ितिथ

दसJ बर 2017 - शू*य

[सं. सीएमडी/13:13]

टी. कलैवाणन, वै]ािनक ‘जी’ एवं मुख

New Delhi, the 6th February, 2018

S.O. 283.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (6) of the regulation 5 of the Bureau of Indian Standards

(Certification) Regulations 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies that the licence particulars of

which are given below have been cancelled/suspended with effect from the date indicated against each:

SCHEDULE

Sl.

No.

Licence No.

CM/L-

Name & Address of the Licensee

Article/ Process with relevant

Indian Standard covered by the

licence cancelled/ suspension

Date of

Cancellation

DECEMBER 2017 - NIL

[No. CMD/13:13]

T. KALAIVANAN, Scientist ‘G’ & Head

नई द ली, 6 फरवरी, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ. 284

284

284.— भारतीय मानक ? यूरो (माणन) िविनयम, 1988 के िविनयम (5) के उपिविनयम (6) के अनुसरण म भारतीय

दया गया है :-

अनुसूची

सं.

लाइस स सं

सी एम/

एल-

लाइस सधारी का नाम व पता

=थिगत कए गए/ रv कए गए लाइस स के

अंतग8त व=तु/ Bम सJब[ भारतीय मानक का

शीष8क

रv होने क

ितिथ

जनवरी 2018 - शू*य

[सं. सीएमडी/13:13]

टी. कलैवाणन, वै]ािनक ‘जी’ एवं मुख

1506

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 17, 2018/MAGHA 28, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 6th February, 2018

S.O. 284.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (6) of the regulation 5 of the Bureau of Indian Standards

(Certification) Regulations 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies that the licence particulars of

which are given below have been cancelled/suspended with effect from the date indicated against each:

SCHEDULE

Sl.

No.

Licence No.

CM/L-

Name & Address of the Licensee

Article/ Process with relevant

Indian Standard covered by the

licence cancelled/ suspension

Date of

Cancellation

JANUARY 2018 - NIL

[No. CMD/13:13]

T. KALAIVANAN, Scientist ‘G’ & Head

Je ,oa jkstxkj ea=kky;

ubZ fnYyh] 7 iQjojh] 2018

dk-vk- 285-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj egkizca/d]

nwjlapkj ftyk] ufM;kM (xqtjkr) vkSj vU; ,oa muds deZpkjh ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa

fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV ¹lanHkZ (lhthvkbZVh,) la[;k

364@2004º dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 01-02-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&40012@172@2000&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)º

jktsaæ tks'kh] mi funs'kd

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

New Delhi, the 7th February, 2018

S.O. 285.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award [Ref. (CGITA) No. 364/2004] of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation

to the General Manager, Telecom District, Nadiad (Gujarat) & Other and their workman, which was received by the

Central Government on 01.02.2018.

[No. L-40012/172/2000-IR (DU)]

RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 23^rd January, 2018

Reference: (CGITA) No. 364/2004

The General Manager,

Telecom District, Nadiad (Gujarat)

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 17] 2018@ek?k 28] 1939

1507

The Divisional Railway Manager,

D/o Telecom, Anand

…First Party

V/s

Shri Rayajibhai S.Patel,

C/o Shri R.C. Pathak, 4, Deeplex Apartment, Nehru Park,

Vastrapur, Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

…Second Party

For the First Party : Shri P.V. Kharsani

For the Second Party : Shri R.C. Pathak

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-40012/172/

2000–IR(DU) dated 27.12.2000 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in

respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the Deptt. of Telecom in terminating the services of Shri Rayajibhai S. Patel w.e.f.

01.11.1994 is fair and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled?”

The reference dates back to 27.12.2000. Both the parties were served. The second party submitted the statement

of claim Ex. 3 on 11.07.2001 before Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad along with the vakalatpatra Ex. 4 and the first

party submitted the written statement Ex. 6 on 04.10.2005 along with the vakalatpatra Ex. 5 that too before the

Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad.

The second party moved an application Ex. 7 on 17.09.2008 for production of documents by the first party

mentioned therein and the first party submitted the reply Ex. 8 on 12.03.2009 stating that the documents are 5 years old,

hence weeded out. Thereafter, the second party workman stopped to appear in this tribunal despite knowledge of the

reference, therefore, a fresh notice Ex. 9 was sent to both the parties to appear on 28.04.2011. Shri P.V. Kharsani,

advocate for the first party and Shri Chintan Gohel, advocate for the second party appeared in furtherance of the notice.

On 26.09.2017, both the advocates of the respective parties agreed to dispose of the application Ex. 7 at the time of

final argument of the reference. The case was fixed for 21.11.2017 for evidence of the second party. On 21.11.2017 and

today on 23.01.2018, the second party failed to lead evidence and Shri Chintan Gohel, advocate for the second party

stated in writing that the second party workman has not been in his contact, therefore, unable to lead evidence.

Thus it appears that the second party is not willing to prosecute the reference.

Thus the reference is disposed of in the absence of the evidence of the second party with the observation as

under: “the action of the Deptt. of Telecom in terminating the services of Shri Rayajibhai S. Patel w.e.f. 01.11.1994

can be said to be fair and justified.”

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 7 iQjojh] 2018

dk-vk- 286-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj ftyk

bathfu;j VsyhxzkiQ] Hkkjrh; Mkd vkSj VsyhxzkiQ foHkkx] tkeuxj (xqtjkr) vkSj vU; ,oa muds deZpkjh ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼

fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;]

vgenkckn ds iapkV ¹lanHkZ (lhthvkbZVh,) la[;k 621@2004º dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 01-02-2018 dks çkIr

gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&40012@191@1993&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)º

jktsaæ tks'kh] mi funs'kd

New Delhi, the 7th February, 2018

S.O. 286.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award [Ref. (CGITA) No. 621/2004] of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation

to the District Engineer Telegraphs, Indian Post and Telegraphs Department, Jamnagar (Gujarat) & Other and their

workman, which was received by the Central Government on 01.02.2018.

[No. L-40012/191/1993-IR (DU)]

RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director

1508

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 17, 2018/MAGHA 28, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 19^th January, 2018

Reference: (CGITA) No. 621/2004

The District Engineer Telegraphs,

India Post and Telegraphs Department,

Jamnagar (Gujarat)

The Sub-Divisional Officer (Phones),

Indian Post and Telegraphs Department,

Jamnagar (Gujarat)

…First Party

V/s

The President,

Saurashtra Employees Union,

Umesh Commerical Complex, 213-214, 2^nd Floor,

Near Chaudhary High School,

Rajkot (Gujarat)– 360001

…Second Party

For the First Party : Shri B.D. Thakkar

For the Second Party : Shri B.B. Gogia

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-40012/191/93–

IR(DU) dated 05.04.1995 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in

respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of Sub-Divisional Officer, Jamnagar in terminating the services of

Shri Jadeja Amarsinh, Ex-casual labour is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled?”

The reference dates back to 05.04.1995. The second party workman submitted the statement of claim Ex. 2 on

07.08.1996 while pending the matter in the Industrial Tribunal, Rajkot alongwith the vakalatpatra Ex. 4 and documents

vide list Ex. 5 on the same day.

The first party submitted the written statement Ex. 6 on 07.08.1996 in the Industrial Tribunal, Rajkot alongwith

the documents vide list Ex. 11. The Industrial Tribunal did not dispose of the reference in the absence of the evidence

of the parties.

On creation of this tribunal and vide order number Z-22019/6/2007-IR (C-II) dated 19.10.2010 of the Ministry

of Labour and Employment, Government of India, the reference was transferred to this tribunal, record was received in

this tribunal on 02.11.2010. Both the parties appeared in this tribunal but since then the second party did not prefer to

lead oral evidence despite giving dozen of opportunities to lead evidence.

Today on 19.01.2018, Advocate Kajal L. Kalwani, on behalf of the second party’s legal heirs, as the second

party has died, informs the tribunal that her legal heirs are not interested to contest the case.

Thus the reference is disposed of as not pressed.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 7 iQjojh] 2018

dk-vk- 287-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj funs'kd]

eawxiQyh fjtoZ funs'kky;] twukx<+ (xqtjkr) ,oa muds deZpkjh ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 17] 2018@ek?k 28] 1939

1509

fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV ¹lanHkZ (lhthvkbZVh,) la[;k

68@2014º dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 19-12-2017 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&42012@36@2014&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)º

jktsaæ tks'kh] mi funs'kd

New Delhi, the 7th February, 2018

S.O. 287.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award [Ref. (CGITA) No. 68/2014] of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation

to the Director, Directorte of Groundnut Research, Junagadh (Gujarat) and their workman, which was received by the

Central Government on 19.12.2017.

[No. L-42012/36/2014-IR (DU)]

RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 22^nd November, 2017

Reference: (CGITA) No. 68/2014

The Director,

Directorate of Groundnut Research (DGR),

Ivanagar, PB No. 5,

Junagadh (Gujarat) – 362001

…First Party

V/s

Smt. Jayaben Bhimabhai Khania and others,

Pura Plot, Village Ivanagar,

Post – Timbawadi,

Junagadh (Gujarat)

…Second Party

For the First Party : Shri H.R. Raval

For the Second Party : Shri P.C. Chaudhary

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-42012/36/

2014-IR(DU) dated 21.07.2014 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in

respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of Directorate of Groundnut Research (DGR), Junagadh in not

granting the temporary status to Smt. Jayaben Bhimabhai, Maluben Mujri, Mariyam Husain and Laxmiben

Balu, all casual labourers working since last more than 20 years is justified?”

And

“Whether the action of the management of Directorate of Groundnut Research (DGR), Junagadh in not

granting the temporary status to Smt. Jayaben Bhimabhai, Maluben Mujri, Mariyam Husain and Laxmiben

Balu, casual labourers without acceding monetary benefits is justified? If not, what relief, the applicants are

entitled to?”

1510

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 17, 2018/MAGHA 28, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

The reference dates back to 21.07.2014. The second party workman submitted the statement of claim Ex. 8 on

25.01.2017 alleging that he has been working with the first party The Director, Directorate of Groundnut Research

(DGR),Ivanagar, PB No. 5, Junagadh, since last 24 years as a driver. The first party give an advertisement number

22/15 to the post of Technical T1 driver in a daily newspaper to which the workman applied but the first party vide

letter dated 11.03.2016 rejected his application without assigning any reason on administrative ground. The second

party workman is educated to the level of B.A.L.L.B. and personally represented against the said rejection vide letter

dated 12.01.2015 to Indian Counsel of Agricultural Research, New Delhi hereinafter referred to as “ICAR”. The ICAR

disposed of his letter vide letter dated 12.05.2015 directing the first party to take decision at local level. The first party

represented against the representation of the ICAR but the ICAR did not agree to the letter of the first party. He has

further alleged that he represented before the first party for his regularisation of service as his rights were guaranteed

under Article 14, 16, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India. The first party was having a need of driver and he was

serving the first party as driver for last 24 years, therefore, depriving him to regularise him in service amounts to

violation of principle of natural justice as well as provisions of Industrial Dispute Act. He has further alleged that he

was appointed in the year 1994 as a temporary driver and the first party was initially having 4 vehicles viz.

Ambassador, Mahindra Jeep, Tata Sumo and Matador Mini Bus but there were only three sanctioned post of driver.

Seeing the quantity of four vehicles and only three sanctioned post of drivers, he was engaged and wages were

determined and paid to him as per the Government of India Rules. He has further alleged that he was illegally

terminated from service w.e.f. 04.06.2006, therefore, he raised a dispute before the Industrial Tribunal vide Reference

No. 1759/2009 which was decided by way of compromise and he was reinstated along with continuity of service with

back wages but the terms of settlement regarding back wages and regularisation on the basis of the ban of recruitment

of drivers imposed by the Government of India. He has further alleged that his work is of permanent nature, therefore,

his service must be regularised seeing the continuity of service for 24 years. He has relied upon the judgement of Uma

Devi and other judgements decided by the apex court. All the documents referred in the statement of claim have also

been annexed with the statement of claim.

The first party vide his written statement Ex. 9 admitted all the averments made in the statement of claim but

submitted that the first party establishment is a Government organisation, thus governed by the rules and regulations

framed by Government of India and ICAR. He has not been fulfilling the criteria prescribed by the Government of

India for regularisation of service including granting the temporary status. Therefore, the regularisation of the second

party workman beyond the scope of the powers of the first party. The first party has also annexed the documents

concerning the service of the workman.

On the basis of the pleadings, the following issues are framed:

Whether the action of the management of Directorate of Groundnut Research (DGR), Junagadh in not

granting the temporary status to Smt. Jayaben Bhimabhai, Maluben Mujri, Mariyam Husain and

Laxmiben Balu, all casual labourers working since last more than 20 years is justified?

ii.

Whether the action of the management of Directorate of Groundnut Research (DGR), Junagadh in not

granting the temporary status to Smt. Jayaben Bhimabhai, Maluben Mujri, Mariyam Husain and

Laxmiben Balu, casual labourers without acceding monetary benefits is justified?

iii.

To what relief, if any, the applicants are entitled to?

Issue No. i & ii: Both the issues are interrelated, therefore, shall be decided together. To prove his case, the

second party workman has submitted the affidavit Ex. 11 reiterating the averments made in the statement of claim Ex. 8

and all the averments are supported with the documents submitted by both the parties. The only question arises as to

whether a workman who has served for 24 years in the absence of the rules of Government of India, can be regularised

or may be granted temporary status? The workman in his cross-examination has not said anything contrary to the

averments made in the statement of claim but he has admitted that initially there were four vehicles and three

sanctioned post of drivers and there was a ban by the Government of India to further recruit one more driver. He has

also stated that he was recruited through a proper channel of employment exchange. He has also admitted in his cross-

examination that out of four vehicles, one vehicle has recently met a major accident. He has also replied that he can

wait for his regularisation of service till February, 2018 when one driver out of the three regular drivers will retire.

Thus it will be equitable and in consonance of principles of natural justice that the second party workman (driver) who

has rendered a long 24 years of service with the first party must be regularised in service, the day on which one driver

out of the three regular drivers retires. Both the issues are decided accordingly.

Issue No. iii: In the light of the aforesaid findings given in the issues no. i & ii, this issue is decided with a

direction to the first party to regularise the services of the second party workman as a permanent employee of the first

party organisation w.e.f. 01.03.2018.

The award is passed accordingly.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 17] 2018@ek?k 28] 1939

1511

ubZ fnYyh] 7 iQjojh] 2018

dk-vk- 288-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj ftyk

bathfu;j] VsyhxzkiQ] nwjlapkj foHkkx] tkeuxj (xqtjkr) vkSj vU; ,oa muds deZpkjh ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds

deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV

¹lanHkZ (lhthvkbZVh,) la[;k 991@2004º dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 15-12-2017 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&40012@150@1994&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)º

jktsaæ tks'kh] mi funs'kd

New Delhi, the 7th February, 2018

S.O. 288.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award [Ref. (CGITA) No. 991/2004] of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation

to the District Engineer, Telegraphs, Department of Telecommunication, Jamnagar (Gujarat) & Other and their

workman, which was received by the Central Government on 15.12.2017.

[No. L-40012/150/1994-IR (DU)]

RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 01^st December, 2017

Reference: (CGITA) No. 991/2004

The District Engineer,

Telegraphs, D/o Telecommunication,

XMX Jamnagar

The SDO,

Telegraphs, D/o Telecommunication,

XMX Jamnagar

…First Party

V/s

The President,

Saurashtra Employees’ Union,

Baba Ama, 10/5, Junetien Plot, Swami Tahiliaram Marg,

Rajkot (Gujarat)

…Second Party

For the First Party : Shri H.R. Raval

For the Second Party : Shri B.B. Gogia

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-40012/150/94-

IR(DU) dated 30.11.1995 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in

respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the Erst-while department of Telegraphs and New Department of Telecom, through

the Telecom District Manager, Jamnagar in discontinuing/terminating or not taking on duties,

Shri Jayashankar Trivedi, valid, just and legal? If not, to what benefits the workman is entitled for and what

directions are necessary in the matter?”

1512

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 17, 2018/MAGHA 28, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

The reference dates back to 30.11.1995. Both the parties submitted their statement of claim on 30.07.1996 and

written statement on 26.08.1996 respectively. The workman was examined on 30.07.1997 but since then he has been

absent for cross-examination. His advocate Kajal L. Kalwani tried to contact the workman but she failed to trace him.

Therefore, it appears that the second party workman is not willing to prosecute the case.

Thus the reference is disposed of in the absence of the evidence of the second party workman with the

observation as under:” the action of the Erst-while department of Telegraphs and New Department of Telecom, through

the Telecom District Manager, Jamnagar in discontinuing/terminating or not taking on duties, Shri Jayashankar Trivedi,

is valid, just and legal.”

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 7 iQjojh] 2018

dk-vk- 289-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj funs'kd]

eSllZ bZxy us=k lqj{kk vkSj dk£ed lsok,a] eqacbZ vkSj vU; ,oa muds deZpkjh ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds

chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV ¹lanHkZ

(lhthvkbZVh,) la[;k 04@2015º dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 15-12-2017 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&42011@124@2014&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)º

jktsaæ tks'kh] mi funs'kd

New Delhi, the 7th February, 2018

S.O. 289.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award [Ref. (CGITA) No. 04/2015] of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation

to the Director, M/s. Eagle Eye Security and Personnel Services, Mumbai & Other and their workman, which was

received by the Central Government on 15.12.2017.

[No. L-42011/124/2014-IR (DU)]

RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 05^th December, 2017

Reference: (CGITA) No. 04/2015

The Director,

M/s Eagle Eye Security and Personnel Services,

GF, Manika Apptt., Mahakali Cross Road,

Andheri (E), Mumbai – 400093

The Regional Director,

Indira Gandhi National Open University,

Regional Centre, Village Charrodi,

Opp. Nirma University, Sarkhej – Gandhinagar Highway,

Ahmedabad

…First Party

V/s

The Joint Secretary,

Akhil Gujarat General Mazdoor Sangh,

2^nd Floor, Arab Chambers, Opp. Pattarkuva Petrol Pump,

Relief Road, Ahmedabad – 380001

…Second Party

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 17] 2018@ek?k 28] 1939

1513

For the First Party : Mrs. G. Vijaya Lakshmi

For the Second Party : None

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-42011/124/

2014-IR(DU) dated 09.01.2015 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in

respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the demand of the union, Akhil Gujarat General Mazdoor Sangh, Ahmedabad to reinstate with full

back wages of Shri Mahavirsingh K. Pawar, Jr. Asstt. cum Typist in the establishment of the Regional

Director, Indira Gandhi National Open University, Ahmedabad is justified? If so, what relief the workman is

entitled to?”

The reference dates back to 09.01.2015. Despite the appearance of the first party vide vakalatpatra Ex. 3 on

05.12.2017 of his advocate and service of notice on second party on sometimes prior to 21.05.2015, the second party

has failed to submit the statement of claim.

Thus it appear that the second party is not willing to prosecute the reference.

Thus the reference is disposed of in the absence of the statement of claim of the second party with the

observation as under: “the demand of the union, Akhil Gujarat General Mazdoor Sangh, Ahmedabad to reinstate with

full back wages of Shri Mahavirsingh K. Pawar, Jr. Asstt. cum Typist in the establishment of the Regional Director,

Indira Gandhi National Open University, Ahmedabad is unjustified.”

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 7 iQjojh] 2018

dk-vk- 290-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj iksLV

vkWfiQl ds ofj"B v/h{kd] jktdksV (xqtjkr) ,oa muds deZpkjh ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk

esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV ¹lanHkZ (lhthvkbZVh,)

la[;k 633@2004º dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 15-12-2017 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&40012@196@1994&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)º

jktsaæ tks'kh] mi funs'kd

New Delhi, the 7th February, 2018

S.O. 290.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award [Ref. (CGITA) No. 633/2004] of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation

to the Senior Superintendent of Post Office, Rajkot (Gujarat) and their workman, which was received by the Central

Government on 15.12.2017.

[No. L-40012/196/1994-IR (DU)]

RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 06^th December, 2017

1514

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 17, 2018/MAGHA 28, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Reference: (CGITA) No. 633/2004

The Sr. Superintendent of Post Office,

Rajkot Division, G.P.O.,

Rajkot (Gujarat)

…First Party

V/s

The President,

Saurashtra Karmachari Sangh,

10/5, Junction Plot, Swami Tehliya Ram Marg,

Rajkot (Gujarat) – 360001

…Second Party

For the First Party : Shri P.M. Rami

For the Second Party : Shri B.B. Gogia

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-40012/196/94-

IR(DU) dated 09.06.1995 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in

respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of Sr. Supdt. of Post Office, Rajkot Division in terminating

Shri R.M. Vanzara, O/s Postman, Bhaktinagar Post Office, Rajkot with effect from 01.02.1991 just, valid and

legal? If not, to what benefits the workman is entitled for and what directions are necessary in the matter?”

The reference dates back to 09.06.1995.The second party workman submitted the statement of claim Ex. 2

alleging that he was engaged as Casual Labour by the first party from 19.11.1987 to 31.01.199. He has submitted a

table of working days which is reproduced as under:

From

Till Days

Worked under

19.11.1987

26.12.1987

Post Master Bhakti Nagar

Post Office, Rajkot

01.01.1988

31.01.1988

-do-

01.02.1988

30.04.1988

-do-

02.05.1988

30.07.1988

-do-

01.08.1988

17.12.1988

104

-do-

01.01.1990

31.01.1990

-do-

Feb. 90

-do-

10.03.1990

28.04.1990

-do-

02.05.1990

29.05.1990

-do-

04.06.1990

28.06.1990

-do-

02.07.1990

31.07.1990

-do-

01.08.1990

31.12.1990

-do-

01.01.1991

31.01.1991

-do-

Total Days 550

He has further alleged that he worked for more than 240 days in each calendar year but his services were

terminated orally without serving any one’s month notice and also without paying retrenchment compensation as

required under Section 25 F of the Industrial Disputes Act, being the precondition in the matter. He has further alleged

that the casual labours similarly situated like workman and also engaged after the workman, were retained and allowed

to work and inducted them as causal labour under the orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Ahmedabad. He

has further alleged that the aforesaid action of the first party employer was violative of Section 25 F, G and H of the

I.D. Act as well as violative of Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India. He is still unemployed. Thus he has

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 17] 2018@ek?k 28] 1939

1515

prayed for declaring the oral termination order as improper, unjust and illegal and has also prayed for reinstatement

with full back wages.

The first party employer submitted the written statement Ex. 3 submitting that the reference is time barred

having no cause of action. This tribunal has no jurisdiction to entertain the reference as per the decision of the Hon’ble

Supreme Court in SLP (C) No. 17577/1995 (Civil Appeal No. 3305/1996) wherein the departmental post was declared

as Non-Industry. It has been further submitted that the workman has not worked for more than 240 days in any of the

calendar years. He was engaged as a substitute of the regular employee as outsider for Piecemeal Leave Arrangement

of causal leave and earned leave of the permanent employee for short period and he was always relieved after the

expiry of the aforesaid engagement. Therefore, the termination of his service does not arise. There is also no question

of oral termination of services as on completion of specific period about engagement as outsider in leave vacancy, the

arrangement is automatically discontinued on joining of regular employee who availed leave for the said period. Thus

there is no question of violation of Section 25 F of the I.D. Act. It is also submitted that no junior workman to the

second party workman was retained as alleged by the second party workman. Thus there was no violation of Section 25

F, G and H of the I.D. Act as well as violative of Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India.

On the basis of the pleadings, the following issues arise:

Whether the action of the management of Sr. Supdt. Of Post Office, Rajkot Division in terminating

Shri R.M. Vanzara, O/s Postman, Bhaktinagar Post Office, Rajkot with effect from 01.02.1991 just, valid

and legal?

ii.

To what benefits, if any, the workman is entitled for and what directions are necessary in the matter?

Issue No. i& ii: The burden to prove this issue was lying on the workman who in his examination-in-chief,

reiterated the averments made in the statement of claim Ex. 2 and in his cross-examination, he admitted that he was

always engaged as postman in a leave vacancy of permanent or regular postman. He has worked for more than 240 day

in every calendar year but he has expressed inability to submit the wages slip by which he could have proved of his

engaged of more than 240 days in a year. He has admitted that he has no document to prove workman namely

Upadhaya, Ramnikbhai and Rajdevbhai, junior to him were permitted to be engaged by the department after his

termination as casual labour.

The first party examined Abijeet Varinder Singh Patel vide affidavit Ex. 15 who stated that the workman was

always engaged in a leave vacancy of a permanent employee. He never worked for more than 240 day in any calendar

year on temporary basis. He has not said anything contrary to his examination in chief in his cross-examination.

The evidence of both the parties does not establish that the workman has ever worked for more than 240 days in

any calendar year as the workman himself failed to submit the wages slips given to him by the department.

The advocate for the workman has referred Gujarat State Machines Tools Corporation Ltd., Bhavnagar V/s

Deepak J. Desai, 1987 (1) Gujarat Law Reporter 387 Gujarat High Court wherein it has been held that if a temporary

worker is employed in a permanent vacancy, will be entitled for benefit of Section 25 H of the I.D. Act. This judgement

is not applicable because firstly the workman has failed to prove that he worked for more than 240 days and secondly

he was appointed as a substitute in place of leave vacancy of a permanent and regular employee. Thus in the absence of

a vacancy of a sanctioned post, no person can be regularised.

She has further referred Management of Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation V/s M. Boraiah AIR 1983

Supreme Court 1320 wherein it has been held that even discharge of a probationer amounts to retrenchment and

requirements of Section 25 F are to be mandatorily followed. This judgement is also not applicable because the

workman was neither a probationer nor a workman who have served for more than 240 days.

She has further referred Workman of AEIB Corporation V/s Management AEIB Corporation 1985 CJ (SC) 374

wherein the apex court has held that public holidays shall be taken into account for the purpose of reckoning the total

number of days actually worked. It is noteworthy that the workman has not submitted sufficient documentary evidence

regarding the holidays and actual working days.

10.

She has further referred Jasvir Singh V/s State of Haryana 215 Law Suits (SC) 32 wherein the apex court

allowed the appeal on the ground that the workman was retrenched after working for more than 240 days without

serving the notice and paying the notice pay. The appeal was allowed with cost of Rs. 25000/-. This judgement has no

applicability in the present case because the workman has failed to give any evidence regarding working for more than

240 days in any calendar year.

11.

She has further referred Harinandan Prasad V/s Employer I/R to Management of FCI 214 Law Suits (SC) 102

wherein the apex court denied the reinstatement being the workman out of service for last 30 years and was granted

compensation in lieu of reinstatement and regularisation.

1516

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 17, 2018/MAGHA 28, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

12.

She has further referred BSNL V/s Gurumal 213 Law Suits (SC) 1128 wherein the apex court has held that there

was no direct evidence for working more than 50 years but as an equity, a compensation of Rs. 300000/- was granted to

workman.

13.

She has further referred Kalamunddin M. Ansari V/s Government of India 216 AIJEL SC 235138 Gujarat

wherein it has been held that the workman has completed 240 days of work. There is no absolute bar of not considering

the cases of causal labours / workmen for granting temporary status as per the casual labours (grant of temporary status

and regularisation) scheme 1989. It is noteworthy that it is not the case of the workman because that scheme dates back

to 1989 and whosoever had been working prior to scheme, was eligible in the scheme for regularisation while the

workman in his statement of claim has alleged his engagement from 1984 to 16.10.1990 and he was appointed as a

substitute in leave vacancy. Therefore, he ought to have applied in the scheme for regularisation which is not the case

of the workman, therefore, at the most, he may be granted some compensation.

14.

She has further referred Ajabsingh V/s Sirhind Corporative Marketing cum Processing Services Society Ltd.,

1999 Law Suits (SC) 433 wherein the apex court has held that the plea of delay has not been taken in the defence and

the discussion of the reference on such ground is unjustified and if the plea of delay is raised, same must be required to

be proved.

15.

She has further referred Prabhakar V/s Joint Director, Siri Culture Department and others, 215 Law Suits (SC)

wherein the apex court has held that the law of limitation does not apply to the proceedings under the I.D. Act as the

words, “at any time” used in Section 10 supports that there is no period of limitation in making the order of reference

but the appropriate government has to keep in mind as to whether the dispute is still existing or live dispute and has not

become a stale claim and if that is so, the reference can be refused. Whether dispute is alive or it has become stale at the

time when the workman approached the appropriate Government is an aspect which would depend upon the facts and

circumstances of each case and there cannot be any hard and fast rule regarding the time for making the order of the

reference.

16.

After considering all the evidences and documentary evidences, the workman has submitted the zerox copies of

working days issued by Sr. Superintendent of Post Offices, Rajkot which does not show that he has ever worked for

more than 240 days in any calendar year. This is an admitted case of the parties that the workman was engaged on need

basis as postman against the leave vacancy of a regular postman and it is also admitted fact that as and when the regular

employee comes back to the office after availing his sanctioned leave, the workman was always relieved.

17.

It is a settled law that the regular post in the Government Organisation can only be filled up by a due procedure

of recruitment. Thus in the light of the law and evidence, there is no violation of Section 25 F, G and H of the I.D. Act

as well as Article 14 and 16 of the constitution of India. The workman was admittedly engaged in a leave vacancy. Had

there been any permanent vacancy and same had been proved by the workman and had he worked for 240 days in

preceding calendar year, the relief could have been considered. Thus this issue is decided in affirmative and against the

workman.

18.

On the basis of the aforesaid findings of issue no. i, the relief of regularisation cannot be granted.

19.

The award is passed accordingly.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 7 iQjojh] 2018

dk-vk- 291-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eq[;

egkizca/d (nwjlapkj)] [kkuiqj (xqtjkr) vkSj vU; ,oa muds deZpkjh ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV ¹lanHkZ

(lhthvkbZVh,) la[;k 537@2004º dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 24-01-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&40012@161@2002&vkbZvkj(Mh;w)º

jktsaæ tks'kh] mi funs'kd

New Delhi, the 7th February, 2018

S.O. 291.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award [Ref. (CGITA) No. 537/2004] of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 17] 2018@ek?k 28] 1939

1517

to the Chief General Manager (Telecom), Khanpur (Gujarat) & Other and their workman, which was received by the

Central Government on 24.01.2018.

[No. L-40012/161/2002-IR (DU)]

RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 16^th January, 2018

Reference: (CGITA) No. 537/2004

The Chief General Manager (Telecom),

Gujarat Circle, BSNL, Khanpur,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380001

The Telecom District Manager,

BSNL, Ganj Market,

Palanpur (B.K.) – 385001

…First Party

V/s

The Org. Secretary,

The Association of Railway and Post Employees,

15, Shashi Apartment, Nr. Anjali Cinema, Vasna Road,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) - 380007

…Second Party

For the First Party : Shri H.R. Raval

For the Second Party : Shri R.C. Pathak

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-40012/161/

2002–IR(DU) dated 10.02.2003 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in

respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of BSNL (Telecom Department) in terminating the services of

Shri Senjiji Sarupji is legal, proper and justified? If not, to what relief the concern workman is entitled

to and what other directions are necessary in the matter?”

The reference dates back to 10.02.2003. The second party submitted the statement of claim Ex. 7 on 05.04.2005

and the first party submitted the written statement Ex. 10 on 22.08.2010.

The second party moved an application Ex. 11 for production of documents mentioned therein as alleged to be

in the custody of the first party. The first party filed objections Ex. 12 alleging that these documents were too old. The

documents are generally preserved for 5 years and therefore, are weeded out and cannot be filed. The said application

Ex. 11 was rejected by this tribunal on 19.12.2016. Since then the second party has not been giving evidence despite

giving number of last opportunities.

Thus it appears that second party union is not willing to prosecute the reference.

Thus the reference is disposed of in the absence of the evidence of the second party union with the observation

as under: “the action of the management of BSNL (Telecom Department) in terminating the services of Shri Senjiji

Sarupji is legal, proper and justified.”

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

1518

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 17, 2018/MAGHA 28, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ubZ fnYyh] 7 iQjojh] 2018

dk-vk- 292-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj egkizca/d

ch,l,u,y] jktdksV (xqtjkr) ,oa muds deZpkjh ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V

vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV ¹lanHkZ (lhthvkbZVh,)

la[;k 47@2005º dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 15-12-2017 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&40012@149@2004&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)º

jktsaæ tks'kh] mi funs'kd

New Delhi, the 7th February, 2018

S.O. 292.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award [Ref. (CGITA) No. 47/2005] of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation

to the General Manager, BSNL Rajkot (Gujarat) and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on

15.12.2017.

[No. L-40012/149/2004-IR (DU)]

RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 01^st December, 2017

Reference: (CGITA) No- 47/2005

The General Manager,

BSNL, Telecom Department,

Loga Nagar, 2^nd Floor, Gondal Road,

Rajkot (Gujarat) - 360002

…First Party

V/s

The President,

Saurashtra Employees’ Union,

City Shops, 3^rd Floor,

Opp. Jaganath Police Chowky, Dr.Yagnik Road,

Rajkot (Gujarat)

…Second Party

For the First Party : Shri H.R. Raval

For the Second Party : Shri B.B. Gogia

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-40012/149/2004-

IR(DU) dated 03.05.2005 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in

respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 17] 2018@ek?k 28] 1939

1519

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of BSNL, Rajkot in terminating the services of Smt. Kasiben M. Kurbia

a part time employee w.e.f. 01.04.2004, when the matter is referred to CGIT, Rajkot vide reference no. L-40012/

15/2004-IR(DU) dated 08.06.2004 for full time engagement is legal and justified? If not, what relief the

workman concerned is entitled to?”

1. The reference dates back to 03.05.2005.Both the parties submitted their statement of claim Ex. 6 on

08.08.2009 and written statement Ex. 9 on 11.02.2009 respectively. The second party suhmitted the affidavit

of deposition Ex. 13 on 19.09.2011 but since then the second party workman has been absent for cross-

examination. His advocate Kajal L. Kalwani tried to contact the workman but she failed to trace him.

2. Therefore, it appears that the second party workman is not willing to prosecute the case.

3. Thus the reference is disposed of in the absence of the evidence of the second party workman with the

observation as under:” the action of the management of BSNL, Rajkot in terminating the services of

Smt. Kasiben M. Kurbia a part time employee w.e.f. 01.04.2004, when the matter is referred to CGIT, Rajkot

vide reference no. L-40012/15/2004-IR(DU) dated 08.06.2004 for full time engagement is legal and justified.”

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 7 iQjojh] 2018

dk-vk- 293-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eq[; iksLV

ekLVj tujy] [kkuiqj (xqtjkr)vkSj vU; ,oa muds deZpkjh ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa

fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV ¹lanHkZ (lhthvkbZVh,)

la[;k 98@2005º dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 24-01-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&40012@12@2003&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)º

jktsaæ tks'kh] mi funs'kd

New Delhi, the 7th February, 2018

S.O. 293.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award [Ref. (CGITA) No. 98/2005] of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation

to the Chief Post Master General, Khanpur (Gujarat) & Other and their workman, which was received by the Central

Government on 24.01.2018.

[No. L-40012/12/2003-IR (DU)]

RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present:

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT cum Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 16^thJanuary, 2018

Reference: (CGITA) No- 98/2005

1. The Chief Post Master General,

Gujarat Circle, Khanpur,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380001

2. The Manager,

Returned Letter Office,

GPO Compound, Ahmedabad

…First Party

1520

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 17, 2018/MAGHA 28, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

V/s

The Org. Secretary,

The Association of Railway and Post Employees,

15, Shashi Apartment, Nr. Anjali Cinema, Vasna Road,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) - 380007

…Second Party

For the First Party : Shri P.M. Rami

For the Second Party : Shri R.C. Pathak

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-40012/12/2003–

IR(DU) dated 18.10.2005 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in

respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the demand of the Association of Railway and Post Employees, Ahmedabad from the management of

Manager, Returned Letter Office of GPO, Ahmedabad for reinstatement of Shri KalubhaiDudhabhaiVaghela with

full back wages and continuity of service with all consequential benefits is just and legal? If so, to what relief the

workman is entitled and from which date?”

1. The reference dates back to 18.10.2005.The second party union submitted the statements of claim Ex. 7 and

11 on 27.02.2006 and 16.10.2008 respectively. The first party submitted the written statement Ex. 13 on

07.05.2009.

2. The second party moved an application Ex. 16 for production of documents. In response to the application, the

first party instead of filing objections, submitted the documents vide list Ex. 18 on 26.06.2012.

3. The second party submitted the affidavits Ex. 23 and 24 of its workman on 18.01.2014 and 10.02.2017

respectively but neither of the aforesaid witnesses turned up for cross-examination despite giving last

opportunity on 01.04.2017, 01.08.2017, 12.09.2017 and 14.11.2017.

Thus it appears that second party union is not willing to prosecute the reference.

4. Thus the reference is disposed of in the absence of the evidence of the second party union with the observation

as under: “the demand of the Association of Railway and Post Employees, Ahmedabad from the management

of Manager, Returned Letter Office of GPO, Ahmedabad for reinstatement of Shri Kalubhai Dudhabhai

Vaghela with full back wages and continuity of service with all consequential benefits is unjust and illegal.”

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 7 iQjojh] 2018

dk-vk- 294-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj] nwjlapkj

ftyk bathfu;j] nwjlapkj foHkkx] lqjsanzuxj ,oa muds deZpkjh ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa

fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV ¹lanHkZ (lhthvkbZVh,)

la[;k 1081@2004º dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 24-01-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&40012@186@1996&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)º

jktsaæ tks'kh] mi funs'kd

New Delhi, the 7th February, 2018

S.O. 294.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award [Ref. (CGITA) No. 1081/2004] of the Central Government Industrial

Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in

relation to the Telecom District Engineer, Telecom Department, Surendranagar and their workman, which was received

by the Central Government on 24.01.2018.

[No. L-40012/186/1996-IR (DU)]

RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 17] 2018@ek?k 28] 1939

1521

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present:

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT cum Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 12^th January, 2018

Reference: (CGITA) No- 1081/2004

The Telecom District Engineer,

Telecom Department,

Surendranagar – 363001

…First Party

V/s

The President,

Saurashtra Employees Union,

Umesh Commercial Complex, Officer No. 213 and 214,

2^nd Floort, Near Chaudhary High School,

Rajkot – 360001

…Second Party

For the First Party : Shri H.R. Raval

For the Second Party : Shri B.B. Gogia

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-40012/186/96–

IR(DU) dated 04.02.1998 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in

respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of Telecom District Manager, Surendranagar in terminating the services of

Shri Arjanbhai Punjabhai Dulera is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled?”

1. The reference dates back to 04.02.1998.The second party submitted the statement of claim Ex. 3 on

27.04.1998 along with number of documents vide list Ex. 6 and the first party submitted the written statement

Ex. 7. The workman was also examined on 15.12.2003 but he failed to appear for cross-examination.

Thereafter, the second party was given number of dates for cross-examination till today i.e. 12.01.2018.

2. Today on 12.01.2018, the learned counsel for the second party workman Adv. Kajal L. Kalwani stated that the

workman has not been in her contact since long period.

3. Thus it appears that the second party workman is not willing to prosecute the reference.

4. Thus the reference is disposed of in the absence of the evidence of the second party with the observation as

under: “the action of the management of Telecom District Manager, Surendranagar in terminating the services

of Shri Arjanbhai Punjabhai Dulera is legal and justified.”

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 7 iQjojh] 2018

dk-vk- 295-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj] Mkd?kj dk

v/h{kd] lqjsanzuxj ,oa muds deZpkjh ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn

esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV ¹lanHkZ (lhthvkbZVh,) la[;k 48@2014º dks çdkf'kr

djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 24-01-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&40012@22@2014&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)º

jktsaæ tks'kh] mi funs'kd

1522

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 17, 2018/MAGHA 28, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 7th February, 2018

S.O. 295.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award [Ref. (CGITA) No. 48/2014] of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation

to the Superintendent of Post Officers, Surendranagar and their workman, which was received by the Central

Government on 24.01.2018.

[No. L-40012/22/2014-IR (DU)]

RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present….

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT cum Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 09^th January, 2018

Reference: (CGITA) No- 48/2014

The Superintendent of Post Offices,

Post Offices, Surendranagar Division,

Surendranagar (Gujarat)

…First Party

V/s

Shri A.K. Nimbark,

Ex-GDS/BPM,

R/o Vill.MotaAnkewalia,

BO – via Dudhrej, Tal.Wadhwan,

Surendranagar (Gujarat)

…Second Party

For the First Party : Shri P.M. Rami

For the Second Party : Shri Ajay M. Shah

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-40012/22/2014–

IR(DU) dated 06.05.2014 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in

respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of Supdt. Of Post Offices, Surendranagar Division, Surendranagar in

terminating the services of Shri A.K. Nimbark, GraminDakSevak Branch Postmaster at MotaAnkevaliya, Dudhrej

SO without giving and opportunity is legal and justified? If so, what relief the workman, Shri A.K. Nimbark is

entitled to?”

1. The reference dates back to 06.05.2014.After receiving the reference from the appropriate authority on

21.05.2014, notices were issued to all the parties on 10.09.2015, then on 20.06.2016 to appear and submit

their statement of claim or written statement as the case may be. Shri A.M. Shah and Shri P.M. Shah

submitted his vakalatpatra Ex. 5 on 10.02.2016 and vide applications Ex. 7 & 8, the second party sought time

for submitting the statement of claim but he failed to submit the statement of claim despite giving dates on

05.11.2015, 10.02.2016, 13.06.2016, 24.10.2016, 16.01.2017, 06.03.2017, 01.05.2017, 29.05.2017,

27.06.2017, 06.09.2017, 08.11.2017 and 09.01.2018 but to no result and Shri A.M. Shah failed to submit the

statement of claim.

2. Thus it appears that the second party is not willing to prosecute the reference.

3. Thus the reference is disposed of in the absence of the statement of claim of the second party with the

observation as under:”the action of the management of Supdt. Of Post Offices, Surendranagar Division,

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 17] 2018@ek?k 28] 1939

1523

Surendranagar in terminating the services of Shri A.K. Nimbark, Gramin Dak Sevak Branch Postmaster at

Mota Ankevaliya, Dudhrej SO without giving and opportunity is legal and justified.”

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 7 iQjojh] 2018

dk-vk- 296-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj] ofj"B

v/h{kd Mkd] oMksnjk (xqtjkr) ,oa muds deZpkjh ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V

vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV ¹lanHkZ (lhthvkbZVh,) la[;k

08@2015º dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 24-01-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&40012@91@2014&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)º

jktsaæ tks'kh] mi funs'kd

New Delhi, the 7th February, 2018

S.O.296.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award [Ref. (CGITA) No. 08/2015] of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation

to the Senior Superintendent of Posts, Vadodara (Gujarat) and their workman, which was received by the Central

Government on 24.01.2018.

[No. L-40012/91/2014-IR (DU)]

RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 09^thJanuary, 2018

Reference: (CGITA) No. 08/2015

The Senior Superintendent of Posts,

Department of Posts,

Western Division, Fatehganj,

Vadodara (Gujarat) - 390002

…First Party

V/s

Shri Gopal Kantilala Shah,

F/111, Ajitanagar Society,

Vibhag – 2, Karelibaugh,

Vadodara (Gujarat) - 390022

…Second Party

For the First Party : Shri P.M. Rami

For the Second Party : None

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-40012/91/2014–

IR(DU) dated 28.01.2015 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in

respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

1524

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 17, 2018/MAGHA 28, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the Postal Department in terminating the services of Shri Gopal Kantilal Shah, Postal

Assistant w.e.f. 29.10.2012 is legal, proper and just? If not, to what relief the concerned workman Shri Gopal

Kantilal Shah is entitled to?”

1. The reference dates back to 28.01.2015. After receiving the reference from the appropriate authority on

09.02.2015, notices were issued to all the parties to submit their statements on 02.05.2017. Neither of the

parties responded. Thereafter, all the parties were given time in-absentia to submit their submissions on

30.05.2017, 28.06.2017, 06.09.2017 and 08.11.2017. The second party workman did not submit his statement

of claim despite the fact that the first party submitted the vakalatpatra of his advocate Shri P.M. Rami on

08.11.2017. It is noteworthy that the second party workman received the notice on 05.03.2017 but he did not

prefer to appear and submit his statement of claim.

2. Thus it appears that the second party is not willing to prosecute the reference.

3. Thus the reference is disposed of in the absence of the statement of claim of the second party with the

observation as under:”the action of the Postal Department in terminating the services of Shri Gopal Kantilal

Shah, Postal Assistant w.e.f. 29.10.2012 is legal, proper and just.”

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 7 iQjojh] 2018

dk-vk- 297-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj] LVs'ku

funs'kd] dkdM+kikj ,VkWfed ikoj LVs'ku] lwjr (xqtjkr) ,oa muds deZpkjh ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds

chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV ¹lanHkZ

(lhthvkbZVh,) la[;k 72@2007º dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 24-01-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&42011@35@2007&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)º

jktsaæ tks'kh] mi funs'kd

New Delhi, the 7th February, 2018

S.O. 297.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award [Ref. (CGITA) No. 72/2007] of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation

to the Station Director, Kakrapar Atomic Power Station, Surat (Gujarat) and their workman, which was received by the

Central Government on 24.01.2018.

[No. L-42011/35/2007-IR (DU)]

RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 11^th January, 2018

Reference: (CGITA) No. 72/2007

The Station Director,

Kakrapar Atomic Power Station,

Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd.,

P.O. Anumala, Via Vyara,

Surat (Gujarat) – 394651

…First Party

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 17] 2018@ek?k 28] 1939

1525

V/s

The General Secretary,

Kakrapar Anumathak Karmachari Sangathann,

Kakrapar Atomic Power Project, Township,

Post Annumala, Tal.-Vyara,

Surat (Gujarat) - 394651

…Second Party

For the First Party : Shri K.V. Gadhia

For the Second Party : Shri Hitesh D. Katharotiya

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-42011/35/2007–

IR(DU) dated 28.06.2007 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in

respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the demand of the Kakrapar Anumathak Karamchari Sangathan for declaring 8 workers as protected

workmen on the ground that Assistant Foreman, Foreman, Scientific Assistant, Sr. Assistant – II, Draftsman –III

etc. are ‘workmen’ as defined under Section 2(I) of the Industrial Dispute Act, is legal and justified? If so, to what

relief the workmen are entitled to?”

1. The reference dates back to 28.06.2007. Both the parties were issued notices immediate after receiving the

reference from the Government of India. Acknowledgements of the notices were also received. The first party

Kakrapar Atomic Power Station, submitted the vakalatpatra of his advocate Shri K.V. Gadhia along with

written statement Ex. 8 and the second party workman submitted the vakalatpatra Ex. 6 of his advocate Shri

J.K. Parmar along with the statement of claim Ex. 7. Thereafter, the second party workman abstained to

appear, therefore, a fresh notice Ex. 14 was issued to both the parties on 28.07.2011 to appear on 12.10.2011.

On 12.10.2011, Shri A.K. Vaishya submitted the vakalatpatra of Shri Hitesh Kathoratiya but since then the

second party in person remained absent and his advocate Shri Hitesh Kathoratiya every time took adjournment

for leading evidence in the circumstances of physical non-appearance of the second party union’s

representative.

2. Today on 11.01.2018, Shri Hitesh Kathoratiya, the advocate of second party stated that the union has not been

taking interest in the prosecution of the case; therefore, the reference is disposed of as not pressed.

3. Thus the reference is disposed of as not pressed.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 7 iQjojh] 2018

dk-vk- 298-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj] mi

egkizca/d] ikoj fxzM dkWiksZjs'ku vkWiQ bafM;k fyfeVsM] xka/huxj (xqtjkr) vkSj vU; ,oa muds deZpkjh ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼

fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;]

vgenkckn ds iapkV ¹lanHkZ (lhthvkbZVh,) la[;k 02@2013º dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 24-01-2018 dks çkIr

gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&42025@03@2018&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)º

jktsaæ tks'kh] mi funs'kd

New Delhi, the 7th February, 2018

S.O. 298.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award [Ref. (CGITA) No. 02/2013] of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation

to the Deputy General Manager, Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. Gandhinagar (Gujarat) & Other and their

workman, which was received by the Central Government on 24.01.2018.

[No. L-42025/03/2018-IR (DU)]

RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director

1526

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 17, 2018/MAGHA 28, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 08^th January, 2018

I.D. Application : (CGITA) No. 02/2013

Babuji Ransinh Chauhan

Village Baria na Muvada, Tel. Dehgam,

Gandhinagar

C/o

Gujarat Navrachana Mazdoor Karmachari Panchayat,

9, Kabir Chambers, Off. Patelwadi, Bapunagar,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

…Applicant

V/s

1. The Dy. General Manager,

Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd.,

HR Department, 400/2000 KV Sub Station,

Vasna Rathod Road, P.B. No. 9, Dehgam,

Gandhinagar – 382305

2. M/s Narendra Kumar & Co.,

A/52, Mahavir Society, Ranip,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

…Opponent

For the Applicant

: Shri Govindbhai C. Dutt

For the Opposite Party No. (1)

: Shri Sunil J. Joshi

For the Opposite Party No. (2) : Shri M.H. Sanghariyat

Order

1. This is an application moved by the applicant/second party workman, hereinafter referred to as applicant,

alleging that he was working with the management of M/s Narendra Kumar & Co., since long as a Gardener

(Mali) in the Supervision of Department of Horticulture of Power Grid Corporation of India under the guise of

opposite party no. 2 M/s Narendra Kumar & Co., the contractor. His service record was clean and spotless

with good conduct and behaviour. He has further alleged that the opposite party no. 1 Power Grid Corporation

of India was the principle employer and M/s Narendra Kumar and Co., was its contractor. The applicant had

been serving the opposite party for more than 240 days in each calendar year with a salary of Rs. 3200/- per

month. The opposite parties denied him the minimum wages as prescribed under the law despite making

number of complaints. The opposite parties terminated his services on 09.02.2012 on making complaints

which was illegal and unjust, deserves to be quashed and set aside. He was not served any show cause notice

before termination of service. Therefore, the action was violative of Section 25 F of the I.D. Act. They have

also not followed the due procedure while terminating his services. He has further alleged that the junior

workmen are retained while terminating his services. Thus the action was also violative of Section 25 F, G and

H of the I.D. Act. Thus he has prayed for reinstatement of his service with back wages along with legal

expenses of Rs. 10000/- declaring the termination of his service as illegal and unjust.

2. The opposite party no. 2 M/s Narendra Kumar and Co., in his objection Ex. 9 has submitted that the owner of

the opposite party no. 2 M/s Narendra Kumar and Co., Chainsinh was seriously ill and was admitted as indoor

patient in Dr. Rakesh Patel Hospital, Ranip since 10.08.2014 and is not able to submit the proper written

statement, however, he has submitted that he has not been having any outsource contract with opposite party

no. 1 Power Grid Corporation of India. He has further submitted that he is ready to provide work and employ

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % iQjojh 17] 2018@ek?k 28] 1939

1527

the applicant/workman at Gujarat Composite Limited, situated at Kaaligam, District Vijaynagar as a casual

labour. He has further submitted that the applicant wanted his engagement with the opposite party no. 1 Power

Grid Corporation of India, which is not possible at any part in the absence of any contract with it.

3. On the basis of the pleadings, the following issues arise:

Whether the demand of the union, Gujarat Navrachna MazdoorKarmachari Panchayat, Ahmedabad to

reinstate Shri Babuji Ransinh Chauhan (terminated on 09.02.2012) with full back wages in the

establishment of the Dy. General Manager, Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. is legal and

justified?

ii.

To what relief, if any, the workman is entitled?

4. Issue No. i & ii: The burden of proof of these issues was on the applicant who submitted his affidavit Ex. 10

in support of his case. The opposite party no. 1 Power Grid Corporation of India did not submit his written

statement, therefore, the case was ordered to proceed ex-parte against it on 22.11.2016. The opposite party no.

2 M/s Narendra Kumar and Co., today on 08.01.2018 submitted that he is ready to employ the

applicant/workman to his new place of contract employment and he does not want to cross-examine the

applicant/workman.

5. The applicant has not submitted any evidence as to who workman junior to him was retained by the opposite

party no. 2 M/s Narendra Kumar and Co., and has also not submitted any evidence regarding working for

more than 240 days in any calendar year.

6. Thus in the light of the aforesaid submissions of the opposite party no. 2 M/s Narendra Kumar and Co., both

issues are decided with a direction that the applicant will report and join the M/s Narendra Kumar and Co., at

the earliest as and when he desires. He will not be paid any back wages in the absence of the proper evidence

on the principle of “no work no pay”.

7. The award is passed accordingly.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 7 iQjojh] 2018

dk-vk- 299-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj] mi

egkizca/d] ikoj fxzM dkWiksZjs'ku vkWiQ bafM;k fyfeVsM] xka/huxj (xqtjkr) vkSj vU; ,oa muds deZpkjh ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼

fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;]

vgenkckn ds iapkV ¹lanHkZ (lhthvkbZVh,) la[;k 01@2013º dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 24-01-2018 dks çkIr

gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&42025@03@2018&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)º

jktsaæ tks'kh] mi funs'kd

New Delhi, the 7th February, 2018

S.O. 299.— In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award [Ref. (CGITA) No. 02/2013] of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation

to the Deputy General Manager, Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. Gandhinagar (Gujarat) & Other and their

workman, which was received by the Central Government on 24.01.2018.

[No. L-42025/03/2018-IR (DU)]

RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 08^th January, 2018

1528

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 17, 2018/MAGHA 28, 1939

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

I.D. Application : (CGITA) No- 01/2013

JawanjiPujajiBhoi

Village Bhomia, Vadadra, Tel. Dehgam,

Gandhinagar

C/o

Gujarat Navrachana Mazdoor Karmachari Panchayat,

9, Kabir Chambers, Off.Patelwadi, Bapunagar,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

…Applicant

V/s

1. The Dy. General Manager,

Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd.,

HR Department, 400/2000 KV Sub Station,

VasnaRathod Road, P.B. No. 9, Dehgam,

Gandhinagar – 382305

2. M/s Narendra Kumar & Co.,

A/52, Mahavir Society, Ranip,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

…Opponents

For the Applicant

: Shri Govindbhai C. Dutt

For the Opposite Party No. (1)

: Shri Sunil J. Joshi

For the Opposite Party No. (2)

: Shri M.H. Sanghariyat

Order

1. This is an application moved by the applicant/second party workman, hereinafter referred to as applicant,

alleging that he was working with the management of M/s Narendra Kumar & Co., since long as a Gardener

(Mali) in the Supervision of Department of Horticulture of Power Grid Corporation of India under the guise of

opposite party no. 2 M/s Narendra Kumar & Co., the contractor. His service record was clean and spotless

with good conduct and behaviour. He has further alleged that the opposite party no. 1 Power Grid Corporation

of India was the principle employer and M/s Narendra Kumar and Co., was its contractor. The applicant had

been serving the opposite party for more than 240 days in each calendar yearwith a salary of Rs. 3200/- per