2634 GI/2018
(3751)
jftLVªh la- Mh- ,y- (,u) 04@0007@2003µ05
REGD. No. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05
izkf/dkj ls izdkf'kr
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
lkIrkfgd
WEEKLY
la- 20]
ubZ fnYyh] ebZ 20—ebZ 26] 2018] 'kfuokj@oS'kk[k 30—T;s"B 5] 1940
No. 20]
NEW DELHI, MAY 20—MAY 26, 2018, SATURDAY/VAISAKHA 30—JYAISTHA 5, 1940
bl Hkkx esa fHkUu i`"B la[;k nh tkrh gS ftlls fd ;g i`Fkd ladyu ds :i esa j[kk tk lds
Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation
Hkkx II—[k.M 3—mi&[k.M (ii)
PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)
Hkkjr ljdkj ds ea=kky;ksa (j{kk ea=kky; dks NksM+dj) }kjk tkjh fd, x, lkafof/d vkns'k vkSj vf/lwpuk,a
Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India
(Other than the Ministry of Defence)
fons'k ea=kky;
(lh-ih-oh- izHkkx)
ubZ fnYyh] 10 ebZ] 2018
dk-vk- 794-—jktuf;d vkSj dksalqyh; vf/dkjh ('kiFk ,oa iQhl) ds vf/fu;e] 1948 (1948 dk 41) dh /kjk 2 ds
[akM (d) ds vuqlj.k esa oS/kfud vkns'k A ,rn~}kjk] dsaæ ljdkj Hkkjr ds iz/ku dksalykokl] tsíkg esa Jh jkt dqekj] lgk;d vuqHkkx
vf/dkjh dks fnukad 10 ebZ] 2018 ls lgk;d dksalqyj vf/dkjh ds rkSj ij dksalqyj lsokvksa ds fuoZgu ds fy, izkfèkÑr djrh
gS A
¹la- Vh&4330@01@2015º
izdk'k pUn] funs'kd (dksalqyj)
MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS
(C.P.V. DIVISION)
New Delhi, the 10th May, 2018
S.O. 794.—Statutory Order in pursuance of clause (a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular Officers
(Oaths and Fees) Act, 1948 (41 of 1948), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Raj Kumar, Assistant Section
3752
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Officer as Assistant Consular Officer in Consulate General of India, Jeddah to perform the Consular services with
effect from 10th May, 2018.
[No. T-4330/01/2015]
PRAKASH CHAND, Director (Consular)
varfj{k foHkkx
csaxywj] 4 ebZ] 2018
dk-vk- 795-—dsaæh; ljdkj] jktHkk"kk (la?k ds 'kkldh; iz;kstuksa ds fy, iz;ksx) fu;e] 1976 ds fu;e 10 ds mifu;e (4) ds
vuqlj.k esa ,rn~}kjk varfj{k foHkkx ds fuEufyf[kr dk;kZy;] ftlds 80 izfr'kr ls vf/d deZpkfj;ksa us ¯gnh dk dk;Zlk/d Kku izkIr
dj fy;k gS] dks vfèklwfpr djrh gS %&
{ks=kh; lqnwj laosnu dsaæ & nf{k.k (vkj-vkj-,l-lh-&n-)]
vkbZlkbZV ifjlj]
csaxyw#&560037
¹la- 8@1@10@2011&¯gº
Vh- Ñ".kdqekj] voj lfpo
DEPARTMENT OF SPACE
Bangalore, the 4th May, 2018
S.O. 795.—In pursuance of Sub-rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (Use for Official Purpose of the
Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government hereby notifies the following Office of the Department of Space, whereof
more than 80 per cent staff have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi :
Regional Remote Sensing Centre – South (RRSC-S),
ISITE Campus,
Bangalore-560037
[No. 8/1/10/2011- H]
T. KRISHNAKUMAR, Under Secy.
lkaf[;dh vkSj dk;ZØe dk;kZUo;u ea=kky;
ubZ fnYyh] 18 ebZ] 2018
dk-vk- 796-—dsaæ ljdkj] jktHkk"kk (la?k ds 'kkldh; iz;kstuksa ds fy, iz;ksx) fu;e] 1976 (;Fkkla'kksf/r 1987) ds fu;e 10
ds mifu;e (4) ds vuqlj.k esa] dsaæ ljdkj ,rn~}kjk lkaf[;dh vkSj dk;ZØe dk;kZUo;u ea=kky; ds v/hu {ks=k ladk;Z izHkkx] jk"Vªh;
izfrn'kZ losZ{k.k dk;kZy; ds {ks=kh; dk;kZy;] fr:ouariqje ds fuEufyf[kr mi {ks=kh; dk;kZy;ksa dks Hkkjr ds jkti=k esa vfèklwfpr
djrh gS] ftuds 80 izfr'kr ls vf/d deZpkfj;ksa us ¯gnh dk dk;Zlk/d Kku izkIr dj fy;k gS %&
1- mi {ks=kh; dk;kZy;] dksPph
2- mi {ks=kh; dk;kZy;] dksYye
¹la- bZ&11013@6@2016&¯gnhº
vatu dqekj feJk] funs'kd
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3753
MINISTRY OF STATISTICS AND PROGARMME IMPLEMENTATION
New Delhi, the 18th May, 2018
S.O. 796.—In pursuance of Sub-rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (Use for Official Purpose of the
Union) Rules, 1976 (as amended 1987), the Central Government hereby notifies the following offices of Regional
Office, Thiruvananthapuram of Field Operation Division, NSSO of Ministry of Statistics and Progarmme
Implementation in the Gazette of India, where more than 80 per cent of staff have acquired the working knowledge of
Hindi :
1.
Sub-Regional Office, Kochi
2.
Sub-Regional Office, Kollam
[No. E-11013/6/2016-Hindi]
ANJAN KUMAR MISHRA, Director
कृिष
कृिष
कृिष
कृिष एवं कसान क याण
एवं कसान क याण
एवं कसान क याण
एवं कसान क याण मंालय
मंालय
मंालय
मंालय
(कृिष
कृिष
कृिष
कृिष, सहकारता
सहकारता
सहकारता
सहकारता एवं कसान कयाण
एवं कसान कयाण
एवं कसान कयाण
एवं कसान कयाण िवभाग
िवभाग
िवभाग
िवभाग )
नई दली, 18 मई, 2018
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 797
797
797
797.—के सरकार एतद् ारा बरा य सहकारी सिमितयां अिधिनयम, 2002 (2002 का 39) क धारा 4 क
उपधारा (1) ारा द त शि तय का उपयोग करते ए दनांक 20 मई, 2018 से 10 जून, 2018 तक डॉ. आशीष कुमार भुटानी,
संयु त सिचव (सहका*रता) क अवकाश अविध के दौरान के ीय पंजीयक सहकारी सिमितयां के काय-भार क देखरेख के िलए 0ी दनेश
कुमार, संयु त सिचव (एमआईडीएच) को कृिष एवं कसान क याण मं7ालय, कृिष, सहका*रता एवं कसान क याण िवभाग म8 िनयु त
करती है।
[सं. एल-11012/2/2003-एल एंड एम]
सुशील कुमार झा, अवर सिचव
MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FARMERS WELFARE
(Department of Agriculture, Co-operation and Farmers Welfare)
New Delhi, the 18th May, 2018
S.O. 797.—In exercise of the powers conferred vide sub-section (1) of Section 4 of the Multi-State
Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 (39 of 2002), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Dinesh Kumar, Joint
Secretary (MIDH) in the Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Department of Agriculture, Co-operation and
Farmers Welfare to look after the work of Central Registrar of Co-operative Societies during the leave period of Dr.
Ashish Kumar Bhutani, Joint Secretary (Co-operation) w.e.f. 20th May, 2018 to 10th June, 2018.
[No. L-11012/2/2003-L&M]
SUSHIL KUMAR JHA, Under Secy.
पोत परवहन मंालय
पोत परवहन मंालय
पोत परवहन मंालय
पोत परवहन मंालय
नई द ली, 21 मई, 2018
िवषय :
िवषय :
िवषय :
िवषय :
(क) एिसम यानांतरण कंटेनर एवं (ख) खाली कंटेनर के तटीय संचलन के िलए
(क) एिसम यानांतरण कंटेनर एवं (ख) खाली कंटेनर के तटीय संचलन के िलए
(क) एिसम यानांतरण कंटेनर एवं (ख) खाली कंटेनर के तटीय संचलन के िलए
(क) एिसम यानांतरण कंटेनर एवं (ख) खाली कंटेनर के तटीय संचलन के िलए वािणि यक नौवहन अिधिनयम
वािणि यक नौवहन अिधिनयम
वािणि यक नौवहन अिधिनयम
वािणि यक नौवहन अिधिनयम, 1958
1958
1958
1958
क$ धारा 406 के अंतग)त रयाय
क$ धारा 406 के अंतग)त रयाय
क$ धारा 406 के अंतग)त रयाय
क$ धारा 406 के अंतग)त रयायत।
त।
त।
त।
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 798
798
798
798.—
1.
जबक वािणियक पोत प*रवहन अिधिनयम को 1958 म8 उस समय अिधिनयिमत कया गया था जब कंटेनर काग@ शुAआती
चरण म8 था (कंटेनर के िलए आईएसओ मानक 1956 म8 िनधा-*रत कए गए थे)। भारत म8 कंटेनर पोत प*रवहन वष- 1980 म8
3754
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ही शुF आ और इस कार भारत म8 यह अिधिनयम कंटेनर I यवसाय से पहले लागू आ। इस अिधिनयम के लागू होने के समय
काग@ का यानांतरण उतना मह वपूण- मुKा नहL था, दरअसल अिधिनयम म8 ऐसी संभावना क प*रक पना भी नहL क गई थी।
2.
जबक कंटेनर के माN यम से काग@ संचलन सतत Fप से बढ़ रहा है और वत-मान म8 यह भारत के कुल एिसम I यापार क मा7ा
के Fप म8 20% से अिधक है तथा गितशील अंतरा-R Sीय I यापार के ऐसे प*रदृT य म8 जहां अंतरा-R Sीय पोत प*रवहन शु क बत
ितU पVा- मक हW, बेहतर आXथक िUथित (इकॉनोमीज़ ऑफ U केल) हािसल करने के िलए कंटेनर I यापार का ] वाइंट-टू-] वाइंट से
हब-ए^ ड-U पोक मॉडल तक ती_ता से िवकास आ है। इस कार कंटेनर को छोटे प तन से फडर जलयान के माN यम से
यानांतरण प तन पर एकि7त कया जाता है, जहां उ ह8 यानांतरण या मैनलाइन प तन भेजने के िलए बड़े कंटेनर लाइनर पर
लादा जाता है। ऐसा मॉडल भारत म8 पूरी तरह िवकिसत नहL आ है और इसके प*रणामU वFप लगभग 33% भारतीय कंटेनर
काग@ िवदेशी प तन पर ही यानांत*रत होता है। वष- दर-वष- यानांतरण क मा7ा बढ़ती जा रही है और वष- 2007-08 के
26% से बढ़ कर वष- 2016-17 म8 यह 33% हो गया है (भारतीय प तन एसोिसएशन)।
3.
जबक कंटेनर पोत प*रवहन के िलए I यापार मॉडल, हब ए^ ड U पोक मॉडल पर दृढ़ता से िU थर आ है और इसके कारण
िवT वभर म8 यानांतरण हब का िनमा-ण आ है।
4.
जबक पोत प*रवहन और कंटेनर संभलाई तकनीक म8 तर क होने से आधार-जलयान के Fप म8 लगाए जाने वाले जलयान के
आकार (18,000 टीईयू से अिधक) म8 दन ब दन वृिV हो रही है और अिधक गहराई के डुबाव वाले यानांतरण प तन िवकिसत
कए जा रहे हW।
5.
जबक समूचे िवT व म8, वत-मान म8, U थािपत यानांतरण प तन भिवR य म8 यानांतरण प तन के Fप म8 अपनी उ कृR टता को बनाए
रखने के िलए आधुिनक प तन के Fप म8 अपने िवकास के िलए अिधक से अिधक िनवेश कर रहे हW।
6.
जबक भारत म8 dे7ीय हब प तन के साथ ितU पVा- करने के िलए नीितगत ढ़ांच और लागत लाभ के साथ बड़े, आधुिनक,
अंतरा-R Sीय, यानांतरण प तन/हब का सुदृढ़ इको-िसU टम िवकिसत कया जाना अभी भी बाक है।
7.
जबक िवदेशी यानांतरण प तन म8 भारतीय काग@ का यानांतरण होने पर िवदेशी प तन पर यातायात म8 वृिV होती है, और
इससे अ य देश म8 रोज़गार सृिजत होते हW, प तन और लॉिजिUटक भार के Fप म8 भारतीय िशपर/परेिषितय या
िनया-तक/आयातक से होने वाले राजU व म8 हािन होती है एवं िवदेशी प तन ारा भारतीय िनया-तक/आयातक से यानांतरण
राजU व एवं भार क वसूली कए जाने के कारण िवदेशी मुा क भी हािन होती है।
8.
जबक भारत म8 यानांतरण प तन को बढ़ावा देने से (क) पोत प*रवहन लाइन के बीच ितU पVा- बढ़ेगी और समान अवसर के
कारण fैट दर म8 कमी आएगी िजससे भारतीय I यापार और अिधक ितU पVा- मक बनेगा। (ख) भारतीय प तन बनाम िवदेशी
प तन म8 समय एवं दूरी कुशल लॉिजिUट स से भी फडgरग लागत म8 कमी आएगी। (ग) भारतीय कंटेनर काग@ को िवदेशी
प तन से भारतीय प तन म8 अंत*रत करने से प तन के लाभ एवं रोज़गार म8 और अिधक वृिV होगी। (घ) यानांतरण इको-
िसU टम (प तन एवं लॉिजिUट स से टर, लघु एवं मN यम उiम, प तन और पोत प*रवहन dे7 के सेवा दाताj को सdम
बनाने सिहत) क U थापना होने से भारतीय प तन िवदेशी प तन से आने वाले और वहां तक जाने वाले काग@ को संभवत:
अपनी तरफ आकXषत कर सकते हW, िजससे भारतीय महाप तन क काग@ मा7ा म8 और अिधक वृिV होगी तथा (ड.) िवदेशी
मुा को भारत म8 रखने म8 सफलता िमलेगी।
9.
जबक िवदेशी प तन म8 स] लाई लाइन लैग टाइम तथा यानांतरण से एिसम I यापार क लागत म8 भारी वृिV होती है िजससे
वैिT वक बाज़ार म8 भारतीय I यापा*रय और िविनमा-ताj क ितU पVा- मकता पर ितकूल भाव पड़ता है।
10.
जबक भारतीय प तन और भारतीय यानांतरण प तन के बीच समु के माN यम से एिसम कंटेनर के यातायात को ो सािहत
करने के िलए फडर dमता को बढ़ाने क अवT यकता है।
11.
जबक भारत म8 यानांतरण प तन को िवकिसत करने के िलए भारत म8 कंटेनर के यानांतरण तथा फडर के िलए कंटेनर
जलयान क पंच क सुगमता, समयबV सेवाj क िवT वसनीयता और उपलl धता एक पूवा-पेdा है।
12.
जबक दुतरफा काग@ संचलन क I यवU था करने से प*रवहन क लागत म8 कमी आने, काग@ क मा7ा म8 वृिV होने और नौवहन
बेड़ म8 िनवेश सुकर बनने क संभावना है।
13.
जबक समुी प*रवहन म8 रेल तथा सड़क माग- से प*रवहन क तुलना म8 माल के प*रवहन के ित टन-क.मी. लागत म8 कमी
लाने के साथ ही लंबी दूरी तक माल के प*रवहन से होने वाले nीनहाउस गैस उ सज-न को ित टन-क.मी. एक ितहाई तक कम
करने क dमता है।
14.
जबक वािणि यक पोत प*रवहन अिधिनयम, 1958 क धारा 406 के अनुसार भारतीय नाग*रक या भारत म8 िनगमीकृत कसी
कंपनी या भारत म8 पंजीकृत कसी सहकारी-सोसाइटी ारा चाट-र कए गए कसी भारतीय पोत या कसी अ य पोत को इस
धारा के तहत नौवहन महािनदेशक ारा द त लाइस8स के िबना भारत म8 या भारत के बाहर के कसी प तन या U थान से समु
म8 ले जाने क अनुमित नहL दान क गई है।
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3755
15.
जबक कंटेनर के यानांतरण के I यवसाय मॉडल से डील करने के िलए, कई देश ने अंतरा-R Sीय I यापार क मा7ा बढ़ाने और
प*रवहन लागत को कम करने के िलए अपने घरेलू कानून (कानून) म8 *रयायत देकर िवदेशी N वज वाले जलयान को अपने
तटीय इलाक म8 काग@ के यानांतरण क अनुमित देने के िलए कदम उठाए हW।
16.
जबक भारत के एिसम I यापार म8 कंटेनरीकृत काग@ के qमश: बढ़ती िहU सेदारी और कसी िवशेष प तन से होने वाले आयात
और िनया-त म8 असंतुलन के कारण कुछ प तन पर खाली कंटेनर और कुछ अ य प तन पर, उिचत आकार और कार के Fप म8,
कंटेनर क कमी क समU या िनरंतर बनी रहती है। इस कार खाली कंटेनर क *रइr पोिजशsनग के िलए लागत म8 पया-] त
बढ़ोतरी के िबना भारतीय तट पर एक प तन से दूसरे प तन तक सही आकार और कार के खाली कंटेनर के संचलन क
आवT यकता है।
17.
जबक िनरंतर बनी ई समान कार क मांग के कारण बेड़ म8 पया-] त Fप से िनवेश नहL हो पाता और इसके प*रणामU वFप
भारतीय तट पर खाली कंटेनर क *रइr पोिजशsनग के िलए लागत म8 बढ़ोतरी के िबना एक प तन से दूसरे प तन तक खाली
कंटेनर क संचालन क आवT यकता पड़ती है।
18.
जबक 11 मई, 2018 क अिधसूचना सं. 38/2018 –कU टr स (एन.टी.) के अनुसार क8ीय अ यd कर एवं सीमाशु क बोड- ने
आयाितत माल, िनया-त माल, तटीय माल एवं िवदेश म8 Sैांिजट या यानांतरण के िलए ेिषत माल के वहन के िलए ािधकृत
समुी वाहक को इस शत- पर अनुमित दान क है क उनके ारा उिचत अिधकारी को समेकत U थान एवं आगमन मैिनफेU ट
इलै Sॉिनक Fप से भेजा गया हो।
19.
जबक मौजूदा िविनयामक संरचना के अनुसार नौवहन महािनदेशक ारा वाि^यियक पोत प*रवहन अिधिनयम, 1958 क
धारा 406 के तहत जारी कए गए लाइस8स के अधीन ही भारतीय नग*रक या भारत म8 िनगमीकृत कसी कंपनी या भारत म8
पंजीकृत कसी सहकारी-सोसाइटी ारा चाट-र कया गया कोई िवदेशी पोत भारत के कसी एक U थान या प तन से खाली
कंटेनर को लाद सकता है या भरे ए कंटेनर को भारत के अ य U थान पर पंचा सकता है।
20.
जबक भारतीय प तन को मुख यानांतरण हब के Fप म8 उपयोग करने हेतु अंितम लt य U थान तक यानांतरण कंटेनर के
प*रवहन के िलए सुिवधा दान करने क आवT यकता है।
21.
जबक, िनuदR ट पंजीकरण प तन पर पोत के पंजीकरण के आधार पर भारतीय पोत धारा 406 के तहत लाइस8स के िलए
अनुमोदत माने गए हW और इनको यानांतरण क अनुमित दान क गई है।
22.
जबक भारतीय नाग*रक या भारत म8 िनगमीकृत कसी कंपनी या भारत म8 पंजीकृत कसी सहकारी-सोसाइटी ारा चाट-र कए
गए कसी अ य पोत को भारत के अंदर या बाहर कसी प तन या U थान से समु तक ले जाने के िलए धारा 406 के तहत
लाइस8स दान कए जाने क आवT यकता है।
23.
जबक, भारत म8 I यापार को ो सािहत करना और I यापार करने को सुकर बनाना भारत सरकार ारा बल दए जाने वाले
मुख dे7 म8 से एक है, और काग@ क िशsपग और जलयान के चालन क qया को सरल बनाने क आवT यकता है।
24.
जबक उपयु- त तv य को N यान म8 रखते ए िवदेशी प तन के माN यम से भारतीय एिसम कंटेनर के यानांतरण को
कम/समा] त करने के िलए तथा खाली कंटेनर क *रपोिजशsनग क लागत म8 कमी लाने के िलए जनिहत और राR Sिहत म8
भावी नीितगत उपाय को लागू करने क आवT यकता है।
25.
अत:, वत-मान म8 क8 सरकार वािणियक पोत प*रवहन अिधिनयम, 1958 क धारा 406 उप-धारा (1) के तहत द त शिwय
का योग करते ए िनr नानुसार िनदेश देती है:
25.1 भारत म8 तटीय I यापार म8 लगे ए िनr निलिखत 0ेणी के पोत पर धारा 406 क उप-धारा(1) के ावधान लागू नहL
हगे :
क.
भारतीय नाग*रक या भारत म8 िनगमीकृत कसी कंपनी अथवा भारत म8 पंजीकृत कसी सहकारी-सोसाइटी
ारा चाट-र कए गए पोत जो यानांतरण के िलए लदे ए एिसम कंटेनर के प*रहवन हेतु वृ त अिधिनयम
क धारा 21 के खंड (ख) म8 िनयत अपेdाj को पूरा करते ह।
ख.
भारतीय नाग*रक या भारत म8 िनगमीकृत कसी कंपनी या भारत म8 पंजीकृत कसी सहकारी-सोसाइटी ारा
चाट-र कए गए पोत जो भारत के कसी प तन से भारत के कसी अ य प तन तक खाली कंटेनर के प*रवहन के
िलए वृ त अिधिनयम क धारा 21 के ख^ ड (ख) म8 िनयत अपेdाj को पूरा करते ह।
25.2 पैरा 25.1 (क) पर पोत को दी गई ये *रयायत8 िनr निलिखत के िलए उपलl ध हगी:
क.
लदे ए कंटेनर को भारत के प तन म8 यानांतरण के उKेT य से भारत के बाहर िUथत कसी प तन से या वहां
तक के िलए एकल लदान िबल पर पारेिषत कया गया हो; और
ख.
लदे ए कंटेनर पर भारत के कसी प तन पर केवल यानांतरण के िलए माल लादा या उतारा गया हो; और
ग.
लदा आ कंटेनर यानांतरण के िलए आगमन मैिनफेU ट या U थान मैिनफेU ट, जैसा भी मामला हो, के तहत
कवर कया गया हो।
3756
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
25.3 चाट-रर को चाट- कए गए जलयान के संबंध म8 नौवहन महािनदेशालय को सूचना दान करनी होगी। सूचना दान के
िलए िनधा-*रत फामxट अनुबंध
अनुबंध
अनुबंध
अनुबंध-1 म8 दया गया है और यह सूचना जलयान को चाट- करने से 24 घंटे के भीतर sd2-
[email protected]ई-मेल से नौवहन महािनदेशालय को दान करनी होगी। िनधा-*रत फामxट पर िशsपग लाइन अथवा
चालक के ािधकृत हU ताdर कता- ारा िडिजटल या अ य कार से हU ताd*रत होना चािहए।
25.4 भारतीय नौसेना, तट रdक, रा य समुी पुिलस और सीमाशु क के साथ-साथ भारतीय कानून वत-न एज8िसय को
उ त पोत/qू के वाU तिवक प*रचय प7 क पुिy करने के िलए कसी भी समय समु म8 इन पोत पर बोड- करने क
अनुमित दी जाए।
26. यह अिधसूचना त काल भाव से लागू होगी और यह संशोिधत या वापस िलए जाने तक वैध रहेगी।
[फा. सं. एसडl यू-15011/2/2016-एमजी]
पवनेश कुमार शमा-, अवर सिचव
अनुबंध
अनुबंध
अनुबंध
अनुबंध-1
1
1
1
नौवहन महािनदेशालय को चाट)ड जलयान क$ सूचना /दान करने के िलए फाम1ट
नौवहन महािनदेशालय को चाट)ड जलयान क$ सूचना /दान करने के िलए फाम1ट
नौवहन महािनदेशालय को चाट)ड जलयान क$ सूचना /दान करने के िलए फाम1ट
नौवहन महािनदेशालय को चाट)ड जलयान क$ सूचना /दान करने के िलए फाम1ट
(i)
चाट-रर का नाम
(ii)
आईएमओ सं. सिहत पोत का नाम
(iii)
पोत का N वज
(iv)
(iv)
(iv)
(iv)
चाट)र करने क$ अविध
चाट)र करने क$ अविध
चाट)र करने क$ अविध
चाट)र करने क$ अविध
ट
ट
ट
ट2 प
2 प
2 प
2 पणी
णी
णी
णी : जलयान को चाट-र करने के 24 घंटे के भीतर नौवहन महािनदेशालय को [email protected] पर ईमेल से भेजे गए ऐसे
दU तावेज िशsपग लाईन अथवा चालक के ािधकृत हU ताdरकता- ारा िडजीटल या अ य कार से हU ताd*रत होने चािहएं।
MINISTRY OF SHIPPING
New Delhi, the 21st May, 2018
Subject : Relaxation under Section 406 of the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958, for coastal movement of (a)
EXIM Transhipment Containers and (b) Empty Containers
S.O. 798.—
1.
Whereas the Merchant Shipping Act was enacted in 1958 at a time when container cargo was in a nascent stage
(ISO standards for containers were fixed in 1956). In India, container shipping started only in the year 1980 and
thus the Act predates the business of containers in India. Transhipment of cargo was not a major issue at the
time of enactment, in fact the Act did not envisage such an eventuality.
2.
Whereas the movement of cargo by containers has been rising continuously and is presently more than 20% of
India’s total EXIM trade volumes, and whereas in a dynamic international business situation where
international shipping tariff is highly competitive, in order to achieve better economies of scale, container
business has rapidly evolved from point-to-point to hub-and-spoke model. Thus the containers from smaller
ports are shipped via feeder vessels and then aggregated at a transhipment port from where they are loaded in a
bigger container liner for another transhipment or mainline port. Such a model has not fully evolved in India
and this has resulted in almost 33% of Indian container cargo getting transshipped at foreign ports. The extent
of transhipment is increasing year on year and has increased from 26% in 2007-08 to 33% in 2016-17 (Indian
Ports Association).
3.
Whereas the business model for container shipping has firmly stabilized for the hub and spoke model and has
resulted in the formation of transhipment hubs worldwide.
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3757
4.
Whereas the advancement in shipping and container handling technology is leading to the deployment of ever
increasing size of vessels (in excess of 18,000 TEUs) as mother vessels and development of deeper draft
transhipment ports.
5.
Whereas the currently established transhipment ports across the globe are investing further in developing
themselves as modern ports of the future to retain their pre-eminence as transhipment ports.
6.
Whereas India is yet to develop a robust eco-system of large, modern international transhipment ports/hubs with
policy structures and cost advantages to compete with regional hub ports.
7.
Whereas transhipment of Indian cargo at foreign transhipment ports leads to traffic growth at foreign ports and
hence, job creation in other countries, loss of revenue from Indian shippers/ consignees or exporters/importers
to foreign ports in terms of port and logisticscharges, and loss of foreign exchange to foreign ports as the
transhipment revenues and charges are collected from Indian exporters/importers by foreign ports.
8.
Whereas promoting transhipment ports in India would lead to (a) higher competition amongst shipping lines
and a level playing field would reduce freight rates making Indian trade more competitive (b) time and distance
efficient logistics between Indian ports versus foreign ports would also contribute to lowering in feedering cost
(c) shifting of Indian container cargo from foreign ports to Indian ports would lead to higher port profitability
and employment (d) upon establishment of transhipment ecosystem including ports and logistics sector,
enabling small and medium enterprises, service providers to the ports and the shipping sector, Indian ports can
potentially attract cargo originating from and destined to foreign ports, adding to further cargo growth at major
Indian ports and (e) retention of foreign exchange in India.
9.
Whereas the supplychain lag time and transhipment at a foreign port increases cost to the EXIM trade adversely
impacting the competitiveness of Indian traders and manufacturers in the global market.
10.
Whereas there is a requirement to enhance feeder capacity to support movement of EXIM containers by sea
between Indian ports and the Indian transhipment ports.
11.
Whereas availability, time-bound port operations and ease of access to container vessels for feeders and
transhipment of containers within India is a prerequisite for development of transhipment ports in India.
12.
Whereas providing for two-way cargo movement has the potential of reducing the cost of transport, improving
cargo volumes and facilitating investment in shipping fleet.
13.
Whereas sea borne transportation has the potential of simultaneously reducing the per tonne-km cost of
transporting goods as well as reducing the greenhouse gas emission per tonne-km of transporting the goods over
long distances by one-third, compared to rail and road based transportation.
14.
Whereas as per Section 406 of Merchant Shipping Act, 1958, no Indian ship and no other ship chartered by a
citizen of India or a company incorporated in India or a co-operative society registered in India shall be taken to
sea from a port or place within or outside India except under a license granted by the Director General, Shipping
under this section.
15.
Whereas to deal with the business model of transhipment of containers, various countries have taken steps to
allow vessels from foreign flags to trade on their coastal water for transhipment cargoes by relaxing provisions
of their domestic law(s) to boost international trade volume and reduce transportation cost.
16.
Whereas, due to the gradual increase in the share of containerized cargo and imbalance in the imports and
exports from a particular port, there is a perennial problem of empty containers accumulating at some ports and
shortage of containers at others, in terms of size and type. Thus, there is a requirement of movement of empty
containers, of the apt size and type, from one port to another along the Indian coast without adding substantially
to the cost of repositioning of the empty containers.
17.
Whereas persistence of unidirectional demand leads to insufficient investment in the fleet and, as a result, there
is a requirement of movement of empty containers from one port to another along the Indian coast, without
adding substantially to the cost for repositioning of the empty containers.
18.
Whereas as per Notification No. 38 / 2018 - Customs (N.T.) dated 11th May 2018, the Central Board of Indirect
Taxes and Customs has allowed authorized sea carriers for carrying imported goods, export goods, coastal
goods or goods meant for foreign transit or foreign transhipment subject to delivery of an integrated departure
and arrival manifest to the proper officer electronically.
3758
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
19.
Whereas as per existing regulatory framework a foreign ship chartered by a citizen of India or a company
incorporated in India or a registered society registered in India can load an empty or laden container from one
place or port in India and discharge at other place or port in India, only under a license issued by the Director
General of Shipping under Section 406 of the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958.
20.
Whereas transportation of the transhipmentof containers up to the final destination needs to be facilitated to
make Indian ports as major transhipment hubs.
21.
Whereas Indian ships by virtue of the registration of ships at designated ports of registry are deemed approved
for license under Section 406, and have transhipment allowance.
22.
Whereas other ships which may be chartered by citizens of India or a company incorporated in India or a
corporate society registered in India still require to be granted license under Section 406 to be taken to sea from
a port or place within or outside India.
23.
Whereas promotion of trade and ease of doing business in India is one of the major thrust areas of the
Government of India, and there is a need to simplify processes for shipping of cargo and operation of vessels.
24.
Whereas considering the above facts, it is necessary to put in place effective policy measures in public and
national interest to reduce/eliminate transhipment of Indian EXIM container/empty cargo through foreign ports
and reduce the cost for repositioning of the empty containers.
25.
Now, therefore, the Central Government, in exercise of the powers conferred under sub-section (1) of Section
406 of the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958, directs as under:
25.1 The provisions of sub-section (1) of Section 406 shall not apply to the following category of ships, which
may be engaged for the coasting trade of India:
a.
Ships chartered by citizen of India or a company incorporated in India or a cooperative society
registered in Indiawhich satisfies the requirements specified in clause (b) of section 21 in the Act
engaged, for transportation of EXIM laden containers for transhipment; and
b.
Ships chartered by citizen of India or a company incorporated in India or a cooperative society
registered in India which satisfies the requirements specified in clause (b) of section 21 in the
Act engagedfor transportation of empty containers from one port of India to another port of
India.
25.2 This relaxation for ships at Para 25.1 (a) shall be available for:
a.
the laden container consigned on a through Bill of Lading to or from a port outside India for the
purposes of transhipment at an Indian port;
b.
the laden container loaded or unloaded at a port in India for transhipment only; and
c.
the laden container covered by the arrival manifest or departure manifest, as the case may be, for
transhipment.
25.3 The Charterer shall submit information of the chartered vessel to Directorate General of Shipping. The
prescribed format for submitting the information is provided in Annexure I and must be shared with
Directorate General of Shipping by e-mail at [email protected] within 24 hours of the charter of the
vessel. The prescribed format should be either digitally signed or otherwise signed by an authorized
signatory of either the shipping line or the operator.
25.4 Indian law enforcement agencies including inter alia Indian Navy, Coast Guard, State Maritime Police
and Customs, shall be allowed to board such ships any time in the sea for ascertaining the bonafide
credentials of the said ships/crew.
26.
This notification shall come into force with immediate effect, and continue to be valid till it is amended or
withdrawn.
[F. No. SW-15011/2/2016-MG]
P. K. SHARMA, Under Secy.
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3759
ANNEXURE 1
Format for information of chartered vessel to be shared with Director General of Shipping
(i)
Name of the charterer
(ii)
Name of ship with IMO No.
(iii)
Flag of the ship
(iv)
Period of charter
Note : the document so shared with Directorate General of Shipping by e-mail at [email protected] within 24 hours of
the charter of the vessel should be either digitally signed or otherwise signed by an authorised signatory of either the
shipping line or the operator.
नई द ली, 22 मई, 2018
िवषय
िवषय
िवषय
िवषय : : : : कृिष
कृिष
कृिष
कृिष , बागवानी
बागवानी
बागवानी
बागवानी, म3 4 य
म3 4 य
म3 4 य
म3 4 यपालन तथा पशुपालन संबंधी सामान के तटीय संचलन हेतु
पालन तथा पशुपालन संबंधी सामान के तटीय संचलन हेतु
पालन तथा पशुपालन संबंधी सामान के तटीय संचलन हेतु
पालन तथा पशुपालन संबंधी सामान के तटीय संचलन हेतु वािणि यक पोत परवहन अिधिनयम
वािणि यक पोत परवहन अिधिनयम
वािणि यक पोत परवहन अिधिनयम
वािणि यक पोत परवहन अिधिनयम
1958 क$ धारा 406 के अंतग)त रयायत।
1958 क$ धारा 406 के अंतग)त रयायत।
1958 क$ धारा 406 के अंतग)त रयायत।
1958 क$ धारा 406 के अंतग)त रयायत।
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 799
799
799
799.—
1.
ज बक, कृषक क आय को बढ़ाने हेतु, कृषक क िवqय को और अिधक बढ़ाने संबंधी आवT यकता है, जहां िवqय मा7ा म8
वांिछत वृिV, सुगम पंच के साथ देश को एक बाजार के Fप म8 खोलने के साथ ही, उ पाद के एक बड़े िहU से को बाजार तक
पंचाने म8 सdम बना कर तथा मुीकृत करने से हािसल क जा सकती है।
2.
जबक, सरकार क घोिषत मंशा है क कृषक के िलए पूव- िनधा-*रत U थान पर पंच के साथ कृिष I यापार के सुगमीकरण और
संरdण देने क मानिसकता को बाजार पा*रिUथितक तं7 का िवU तार करने, ितभािगय क एक िवU तृत 0ृंखला को शािमल
करने तथा कृषक को सुदूर U थान तक पंच हेतु सश त बनाने वाली मानिसकता म8 प*रवXतत करने क आवT यकता है।
3.
जबक, पहले वह िवपणन णाली भावकारी समझी जाती थी, जो खेत क िनकटतम सीमा के अंदर ही बाजार और लेनदेन
उपलl ध कराती थी, अब इन मापदंड म8 बाजार म8 परU पर जुड़ाव एवं खेत व उपभो ताj के बीच वै यू िडU पस-न को शािमल
करने क आवT यकता है।
4.
जबक, घरेलू खपत और िनया-त बाजार क आवT यकताj को कुशलतापूव-क पूरा करने के िलए खराब होने वाले उ पाद के
भंडारण व प*रवहन म8 कृषक एवं रसद दाताj को सdम बनाने म8 प*रवहन संपक-ता तथा रसद बुिनयादी ढांचे क
आवT यकता होती है।
5.
जबक, जल प*रवहन म8 रेल तथा सड़क माग- से प*रवहन क तुलना म8 माल के प*रवहन के ित टन-कमी लागत म8 छठव8 भाग
तक क कमी लाने के साथ ही साथ लंबी दूरी तक माल के प*रवहन से होने वाले nीनहाउस गैस उ सज-न के ित टन-कमी को
एक ितहाई तक कम करने क dमता है।
6.
जबक, सागरमाला काय-qम क राR Sीय प*रेt य योजना म8 खाiान और संसािधत खाi के तटीय संचलन के िलए 9 िमिलयन
टन ितवष- क dमता का अनुमान कया गया है।
7.
जबक, तटीय पोत प*रवहन सिहत, जल प*रवहन के साधन तुलना मक Fप से प*रवहन को सU ते साधन होने के कारण कृषक
को लाभद Fप से I यापक बाजार तक पंचने म8 सdम करेगा, िवqय यो| य माल क र8ज को बढ़ाएगा एवं घरेलू I यापार के
दायरे को बढ़ाया जा सकेगा।
8.
जबक, िनरंतर बनी ई एक समान मांग के कारण बेड़ म8 पया-] त िनवेश नहL हो पाता और इसके प*रणामU वFप भारतीय
प तन को िवT वसनीय और समयबV सेवाएं दान करने के िलए तटीय जलयान क अपया-] त उपलl धता होती है।
9.
जबक, दुतरफा काग@ संचलन क I यवU था करने से प*रवहन क लागत म8 कमी आने, काग@ क मा7ा म8 वृिV होने और नौवहन
बेड़ म8 िनवेश आसान होने क संभावना है।
10.
जबक, वािणियक पोत प*रवहन अिधिनयम, 1958 क धारा 406 के अनुसार उपयु- त अिधिनयम क धारा 21 के ख^ ड (ख)
म8 िनuदR ट अपेdाj को पूरा करने वाले कसी भारतीय नाग*रक या भारत म8 िनगमीकृत कसी भी कंपनी या भारत म8 पंजीकृत
3760
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
कसी सहकारी-सोसाइटी ारा चाट-र कए गए कसी भारतीय पोत या कसी अ य पोत को इस धारा के तहत महािनदेशक
ारा जारी कए गए लाइस8स के िबना भारत के अंदर या बाहर के कसी U थान या प तन से समु तक नहL ले जाया जाएगा।
11.
जबक, िनuदR ट पंजीकरण प तन पर पोत के पंजीकरण के आधार पर भारतीय पोत धारा 406 के तहत लाइस8स के िलए
अनुमोदत माने गए हW और इनको तटीय I यापार क अनुमित दान क गई है।
12.
जबक, भारतीय नाग*रक या भारत म8 िनगमीकृत कसी कंपनी या भारत म8 पंजीकृत कसी सहकारी-सोसाइटी ारा चाट-र कए
गए कसी अ य पोत को भारत के अंदर या बाहर कसी प तन या U थान से समु तक ले जाने के िलए धारा 406 के तहत
लाइस8स ा] त करने क आवT यकता है और इसिलए इनको तटीय I यापार करने क अनुमित है।
13.
जबक, भारत म8 I यापार को ो सािहत करना और I यापार करने को आसान बनाना भारत सरकार ारा बल दए जाने वाले
मुख dे7 म8 से एक है, और काग@ क िशsपग और जलयान के चालन क qया को सरल बनाने क आवT यकता है।
14.
अत: के सरकार वािण य पोत प*रवहन अिधिनयम, 1958 (58 का 44) क धारा 406 के परंतुक के अंतग-त द त शि तय
का योग करते ए इसे जनता के िहत म8 आवT यक एवं लाभकारक मानते ए एतत ारा िनदxश देती है क:
14.1 िवदेश I यापार महािनदेशक, वािण य एवं उiोग मं7ालय ारा अपनाए गए एवं यथा संशोिधत अनुबंध-2 के अनुसार
भारतीय I यापार वग}करण (आईटीसी), हाम@नाइ ड णाली (एचएस) म8 िवXनदR ट कृिष, म U यपालन, कृिष उ पाद
एवं बागवानी संबंधी सामान के समु ारा प*रवहन के िलए तटीय I यापार म8 शािमल होने वाले भारतीय पोत तथा
भारत के नाग*रक या भारत म8 िनगिमत कसी कंपनी अथवा भारत म8 पंजीकृत सहकारी सोसाइटी ारा चाटxड कए
गए पोत धारा 406 क उप-धारा (I) के ावधान लागू नहL हगे।
14.2 पैरा 14.1 पर पोत के िलए छूट इस शत- के अधीन होगी जब पैरा 14.1 के अनुसार िवXनदR ट कृिष, म U यपालन, कृिष
उ पाद एवं बागवानी संबंधी सामान के तटीय I यापार क मा7ा ऑनबोड- िशप काग@ का यूनतम 50 ितशत हो।
14.3 पैरा 14.1 और 14.2 पर पोत के िलए छूट इन शत~ के अधीन भी होगी, जब चाट-र/या7ा संबंधी जानकारी नौवहन
महािनदेशक को U तुत क गई हो। जानकारी U तुत करने के िलए िनधा-*रत फामxट अनुबंध
अनुबंध
अनुबंध
अनुबंध-I पर उपलl ध कराया गया
है तथा इसे भारत म8 प तन से पोत के चलने के कम से कम 24 घंटे पहले [email protected] ई-मेल पर नौवहन
महािनदेशक के साथ साझा करना होगा। िनधा-*रत फामxट पर िशsपग कंपनी या चालक म8 से कसी एक के ािधकृत
हU ताdरकता- ारा िडिजटल अथवा अ य Fप म8 हU ताd*रत होने चािहए।
14.4 उपरो त छूट िनr निलिखत शत- के अधीन होगी क भारतीय नौसेना, तट रdक, रा य समुी पुिलस एवं सीमा शु क के
साथ-साथ भारतीय कानून वत-न एजेि सय को उ त पोत/qू के वाU तिवक प*रचय प7 क पुिy करने के िलए कसी
भी समय समु म8 इन पोत पर बोड- करने क अनुमित होगी।
15.
यह आदेश त काल भाव से लागू होगा और इसे अगले आदेश तक वैध माना जाएगा, जब तक इसम8 संशोधन न कया जाए
अथवा वािपस न िलया जाए।
16.
इसे सdम ािधकारी के अनुमोदन से जारी कया जाता है।
[फा. सं. एसडl यू-14020/5/2009-एमजी/एसए(ख^ ड-9)]
पी. के. शमा-, अवर सिचव
अनुबंध
अनुबंध
अनुबंध
अनुबंध-I
नौवहन महािनदेशालय के साथ साझा क$ जाने वाली जानकारी के िलए फाम1
नौवहन महािनदेशालय के साथ साझा क$ जाने वाली जानकारी के िलए फाम1
नौवहन महािनदेशालय के साथ साझा क$ जाने वाली जानकारी के िलए फाम1
नौवहन महािनदेशालय के साथ साझा क$ जाने वाली जानकारी के िलए फाम1ट
(i)
मािलक/आपरेटर का नाम और प तन
(ii)
आई एम ओ सं. सिहत पोत का नाम
(iii)
पोत का N वत
(iv)
चाट-र क अविध
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3761
ट2 प
ट2 प
ट2 प
ट2 पणी
णी
णी
णी :
नौवहन महािनदेशक के साथ ई मेल [email protected] पर साझा कए गए दU तावेज पर नौवहन कr पनी अथवा आपरेटर
के ािधकृत हU ताdरकता- ारा िडिजटल अथवा अ य Fप से हU ताdर कए जाने चािहएं।
अनुबंध
अनुबंध
अनुबंध
अनुबंध-2
कृिष
कृिष
कृिष
कृिष, म3 4 य
म3 4 य
म3 4 य
म3 4 यपालन
पालन
पालन
पालन, पशुपालन और बागवानी उ3 पा
पशुपालन और बागवानी उ3 पा
पशुपालन और बागवानी उ3 पा
पशुपालन और बागवानी उ3 पाद के अ@ त
द के अ@ त
द के अ@ त
द के अ@ तग)त िवचारणीय सामान
ग)त िवचारणीय सामान
ग)त िवचारणीय सामान
ग)त िवचारणीय सामान
1.
1.
1.
1.
िविभ@ न
िविभ@ न
िविभ@ न
िविभ@ न 4
4
4
4-िडिजट
िडिजट
िडिजट
िडिजट, 6-िडिजट और 8 िडिजट एचएस कोड सिहत 2
िडिजट और 8 िडिजट एचएस कोड सिहत 2
िडिजट और 8 िडिजट एचएस कोड सिहत 2
िडिजट और 8 िडिजट एचएस कोड सिहत 2-िडिजट एचएस
िडिजट एचएस
िडिजट एचएस
िडिजट एचएस कोड
कोड
कोड
कोड
1.1
02- मांस और खाi मांस ऑफल
1.2
03- मछली और qU टेिशयन तथा मोलU क एवं अ य ए वे*टक इ वटेस
1.3
04- डेयरी उ पाद, पdी के अ^ डे, ाकृितक शहद, पशु मूल के खाi पदाथ-, जो कहL और
शािमल नहL हW।
1.4
07- सिlजयां और कुछ मूल और कंद; खाi
1.5
08- फल और नस, खाi; साइSस फल अथवा खरबूजे के िछलके
1.6
09- कॉफ, चाय, मेट और मसाले
1.7
10- अनाज
1.8
11- िमsलग उiोग के उ पाद; मा ट, U टाच- इ यूिलन, गें का लासा
1.9
12-तेल के बीज, िचकने फल; िविवध अनाज, बीज और फल, औiोिगक अथवा औषधीय पौधे;
भूसा और चारा
1.10
14- वेिजटेबल ] लेgटग मैटी*रयल; जो कहL ओर िविनuदR ट अथवा शािमल न हो।
1.11
15- पशुj अथवा सl जी क चब} और तेल तथा उनक िवपाटन चब}
2.
2.
2.
2.
िविभ@ न
िविभ@ न
िविभ@ न
िविभ@ न 6
6
6
6- िडिजट और 8 िडिजट एचएस कोड सिहत 4
िडिजट और 8 िडिजट एचएस कोड सिहत 4
िडिजट और 8 िडिजट एचएस कोड सिहत 4
िडिजट और 8 िडिजट एचएस कोड सिहत 4-िडिजट एचएस कोड
िडिजट एचएस कोड
िडिजट एचएस कोड
िडिजट एचएस कोड
2.1
5101 से 5105 – ऊन, धागा बनने से पूव-
2.2
5201 से 5203 – सूत, धागा/ सूत बनने से पूव-
2.3
5301 से 5305 – वेिजटेबल टै सटाइल फाइबर जैसे पटसन, हैr प और जूट।
New Delhi, the 22nd May, 2018
Subject : Relaxation under Section 406 of the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958, for coastal movement
of agriculture, horticulture, fisheries and animal husbandry commodities.
S.O. 799.—
1.
Whereas to enhance farmers’ income, there is the related need to enhance the selling volume of the
farmers, wherein the desired increase in selling volume can be achieved by enabling a large part of
the produce to reach markets and be monetized; besides opening up the country as one market with
eased access.
2.
Whereas it is the stated intent of the Government calling for a mind-set shift from facilitating and
protecting agricultural trade at predefined locations accessible to farmers, towards one that expands
the market ecosystem, encompasses a wider array of participants and empowers farmers to access
locations further afield is required.
3762
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
3.
Whereas earlier, a marketing system was considered effective if it provided for market yards and
transactions within immediate range of farms, the yardstick today needs to include, the
interconnectivity between markets and the value dispersion between farms and consumers.
4.
Whereas the transport connectivity and logistics infrastructure needs to enable farmers and logistics
service providers to store and transport perishable products to serve the domestic consumption and
export markets efficiently.
5.
Whereas water borne transportation has the potential of simultaneously reducing the per tonne-km
cost of transporting goods to one-sixth as well as reducing the greenhouse gas emission per tonne-
km of transporting the goods over long distances by one-third, compared to rail and road based
transportation.
6.
Whereas the National Perspective Plan of the Sagarmala Programme estimates a potential of more
than 9 Million Tonnes Per Annum for coastal movement of food grains and processed food.
7.
Whereas water borne transportation modes, including coastal shipping, being comparatively cheaper
modes of transport would enable farmers to access a larger market profitably, widen the range of
goods which can be marketed, and lengthen the distances over which domestic trade can be
conducted.
8.
Whereas persistence of unidirectional demand leads to insufficient investment in the fleet and, as a
result, inadequate availability of coastal vessels for providing reliable and time bound services to
Indian ports.
9.
Whereas providing for two-way cargo movement has the potential of reducing the cost of transport,
improving cargo volumes and facilitating investment in fleet.
10.
Whereas as per Section 406 of Merchant Shipping Act, 1958, no Indian ship and no other ship
chartered by a citizen of India or a company incorporated in India or a cooperative society registered
in India which satisfies the requirements specified in clause (b) of section 21 of the above state Act
shall be taken to sea from a port or place within or outside India except under a license granted by
the Director General under this section.
11.
Whereas Indian ships by virtue of the registration of ships at designated ports of registry are deemed
approved for license under Section 406, and have allowance for coasting trade.
12.
Whereas other ships which may be chartered by citizens of India or a company incorporated in India
or a corporate society registered in India still require to be granted license under Section 406 to be
taken to sea from a port or place within or outside India and therefore have allowance for coasting
trade.
13.
Whereas promotion of trade and ease of doing business in India is one of the major thrust areas of
the Government of India, and there is a need to simplify processes for shipping of cargo and
operation of vessels.
14.
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred upon it under proviso of section 406 of the
Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 (44 of 58), the Central Government being of the opinion that it is
necessary and expedient in the public interest, hereby directs that:
14.1
The provisions of sub-section (1) of section 406 shall not apply to Indian ships and ships
chartered by citizen of India or a company incorporated in India or a cooperative society
registered in India to engage in the coasting trade of India for the carriage by sea of
agricultural, fishery, farm produce and horticultural commodities specified in the Indian
Trade Classification (ITC), Harmonized System (HS) as per Annexure 2, as adopted and
modified by the Director General of Foreign Trade, Ministry of Commerce and Industry.
14.2
The relaxation for ships at Para 14.1 is subject to the quantity of coasting trade of
agricultural, fisheries, farm produce and horticultural commodities specified as per Para
14.1 contributing to at least 50 percent of the cargo onboard the ship.
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3763
14.3
The relaxation for ships at Para 14.1 and 14.2 shall further be subject to the conditions
that the information about the charter/voyage will be submitted to the Director General of
Shipping. The prescribed format for submitting the information is provided in Annexure
1 and must be shared with the Director General of shipping by e-mail at [email protected]
at least 24 hours prior to sail of ship from the port in India. The prescribed format should
be either digitally or otherwise signed by an authorized signatory of either the shipping
line or the operator.
14.4
The aforesaid relaxation shall be subject to the following condition that Indian law
enforcement agencies including inter alia Indian Navy, Coast Guard, State Maritime
Police and Customs, shall be allowed to board such ships any time in the sea for
ascertaining the bonafide credentials of the said ships/crew.
15.
This order shall come into force with immediate effect, and continue to be valid till further order,
unless otherwise amended or withdrawn.
16.
This issues with the approval of competent authority.
[F. No. SW-14020/5/2009-MG/SA(Vol.9)]
P. K. SHARMA, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE 1
Format for information to be shared with
Director General of Shipping
(i)
Name of owner/ operator and address
(ii)
Name of ship with IMO No.
(iii)
Flag of the ship
(iv)
Period of charter
Note:
The document so shared with the Director General of Shipping by e-mail at [email protected]should be either
digitally or otherwise signed by an authorized signatory of either the shipping line or the operator.
ANNEXURE 2
Commodities to be considered under agricultural, fisheries, animal husbandry and horticulture products
1.
2-digit HS codes, inclusive of the various 4-digit, 6-digit and 8-digit HS codes
1.1
02 – Meat and edible meat offal
1.2
03 – Fish and crustaceans, molluscs and other aquatic invertebrates
1.3
04 – Dairy produce, bird’s eggs, natural honey, edible products of animal origin, not elsewhere
included
1.4
07 – Vegetables and certain roots and tubers; edible
1.5
08 – Fruits and nuts, edible; peel of citrus fruits or melons
1.6
09 – Coffee, tea, mate and spices
3764
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1.7
10 – Cereals
1.8
11 – Products of the milling industry; malt, starch, inulin, wheat gluten
1.9
12 – Oil seeds and oleaginous fruits; miscellaneous grains, seeds and fruit, industrial or medicinal
plants; straw and fodder
1.10
14 – Vegetable plaiting materials; not elsewhere specified or included
1.11
15 – Animal or vegetable fats and oils and their cleavage products
2.
4-digit HS codes, inclusive of the various 6-digit and 8-digit HS codes
2.1
5101 to 5105 – Wool, prior to yarn formation
2.2
5201 to 5203 – Cotton, prior to yarn/thread formation
2.3
5301 to 5305 – Vegetable textile fibers such as flax, hemp and jute
isVªksfy;e vkSj izkÑfrd xSl ea=ky;
ubZ fnYyh] 4 ebZ] 2018
dk-vk- 800.—dsUnzh; ljdkj us isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbZu ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½
vf/kfu;e] 1962 ¼1962 dk 50½ ¼ftls blesa blds i'pkr~ mä vf/kfu;e dgk x;k gSa½ dh /kkjk 3 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ ds
v/khu tkjh dh xbZ Hkkjr ljdkj ds isVªksfy;e vkSj izkÑfrd xSl ea=ky; dh vf/klwpuk la[;k dk-vk- 2224 rkjh[k 14
flrEcj] 2017 tks Hkkjr ds jkti=] rkjh[k 17 flrEcj & 23 flrEcj 2017] esa izdkf’kr dh xbZ Fkh }kjk ml vf/klwpuk ls
layXu vuqlwph esa fofufnZ"V Hkwfe esa egkjk"Vª jkT; esa ftyk vgenuxj esa rkYkqdk dksijxkao dks;yh & vgenuxj &
lksykiqj isVªksfy;e ifjogu ds fy, bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs’ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbiykbZu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, mi;ksx ds
vf/kdkj ds vtZu ds vius vk’k; dh ?kks"k.kk dh Fkh (
vkSj mä jkti= vf/kfu;e dh izfr;ka turk dks rkjh[k 10 tuojh] 2018 rd miyC/k djk dh xbZ Fkh (
vkSj l{ke izkf/kdkjh us mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ ds v/khu dsUæh; ljdkj dks fjiksVZ dh gS (
vkSj dsUæh; ljdkj us] mä fjiksVZ ij fopkj djus ds i'pkr~ vkSj ;g lek/kku gks tkus ij fd mä Hkwfe
ikbiykbZu fcNkus ds fy, visf{kr gS] mlesa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu djus dk fofu’p; fd;k gS (
vr% vc] dsUæh; ljdkj mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk izn~Ùk 'kfä;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, ;g
?kks"k.kk djrh gS fd bl vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa fofufnZ"V Hkwfe esa ikbiykbZu fcNkus ds fy, mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj
dk vtZu fd;k tk, (
vkSj ljdkj mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi&/kkjk ¼4½ }kjk izn~Ùk 'kfä;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] ;g funsZ’k nsrh gS
fd mä Hkwfe esa mi;ksx dk vf/kdkj bl ?kks"k.kk ds izdk’ku dh rkjh[k ls dsUæh; ljdkj esa fufgr gksus ds ctk,] lHkh
foYyaxeksa ls eqä gksdj bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs’ku fyfeVsM esa fufgr gksxh A
isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbZu vf/kfu;e] 1962 dh /kkjk 10 ds v/khu fdlh Hkh {kfriwfrZ ds fy, bafM;u vkW;y
dkWiksZjs’ku fyfeVsM iw.kZr;k mÙkjnk;h gksxh vkSj ikbiykbZu ls lEcfU/kr fdlh Hkh ekeys ij dsUæh; ljdkj ds fo#) dksbZ
okn nkok ;k dkuwuh dk;Zokgh ugha gks ldsxhA
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3765
vuqlwPkh
Rglhy & dksijxkao
ftyk & vgenuxj
jkT; & egkjk"Vª
ekStk @xzke
losZ @ Cykd @ la-
¼IyksV la-½
lc&Mho&la-
{ks=Qy
gsDVs;j
vkjs
oxZ ehVj
1
2
3
4
5
6
lkoyxkao
113
00
22
60
112
00
13
45
121@1
00
02
00
121@2
00
00
58
116@2
00
11
05
111
00
14
45
109
00
14
14
27@1
00
05
50
27@2
00
07
10
27@4
00
06
80
28@1
00
00
74
28@3
00
03
37
25@1
00
05
68
25@2
00
00
02
22
00
03
32
21
00
04
12
20
00
05
31
17@1
00
06
46
14
00
06
41
13
00
05
59
9
00
06
30
8
00
08
78
7
00
03
83
5
00
00
20
6
00
15
58
3@2
00
07
46
2
00
28
68
fryo.kh
16@2
00
40
37
3766
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
14@1
00
16
74
14@2
00
19
14
13
00
17
38
59@1
00
04
93
59@2
00
03
80
60
00
09
75
61
00
01
91
86
00
07
40
87
00
06
29
88@1
00
06
92
89@2
00
03
46
89@3
00
03
45
91@1
00
06
80
91@3
00
03
75
93@1
00
03
49
94
00
12
38
95
00
03
39
96
00
00
20
101@2
00
00
71
101@3
00
09
32
101@4
00
10
12
101@5
00
09
65
108
00
08
37
109@1
00
04
13
109@2
00
03
75
111
00
09
21
113
00
08
39
114
00
03
25
117@1
00
27
23
117@2
00
16
74
133
00
30
08
132@1
00
20
84
132@2
00
22
50
216@1
00
00
20
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3767
131@1
00
08
82
131@2
00
29
61
218
00
19
10
219@2
00
08
71
219@4
00
08
44
220@1
00
05
79
221@1
00
41
21
221@2
00
07
66
227@1
00
02
63
vkisxkao
57@1
00
14
64
57@4
00
03
57
57@5
00
04
33
55
00
12
96
54
00
06
37
53
00
08
85
52@1
00
05
46
52@2
00
06
93
52@3
00
05
48
50
00
10
61
160@1
00
09
35
160@2
00
07
04
162@1
00
14
75
162@2
00
02
00
163@2
00
00
20
161@2
00
03
46
165
00
06
79
166
00
05
28
167
00
05
37
155@1
00
07
54
154
00
07
11
183
00
07
85
153
00
10
16
152@2
00
00
57
185
00
14
27
3768
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
186
00
03
07
147@4
00
00
01
147@5
00
12
37
147@6
00
16
09
188
00
07
78
145@1
00
44
84
145@6
00
08
05
145@7
00
20
09
192@1
00
13
43
193@1
00
14
96
193@2
00
01
25
193@3
00
22
49
201@2
00
05
85
201@3
00
05
59
201@5
00
06
11
201@6
00
00
67
201@8
00
05
23
200@1
00
20
17
?kks;sxkao
43
00
36
28
44@4
00
32
08
45@1
00
05
68
45@2
00
05
89
45@3
00
06
28
46@2
00
07
66
Rkysxkao eys
70@2
00
01
97
61@1
00
14
90
61@2
00
30
40
60@2
00
01
78
62
00
10
74
63
00
11
99
64
00
12
57
65
00
14
09
55
00
03
09
54@1
00
11
60
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3769
54@2
00
14
84
53@1
00
14
56
53@2
00
04
49
53@3
00
04
28
53@4
00
04
32
52@1
00
09
08
52@2
00
13
11
52@3
00
20
54
49
00
00
78
51
00
10
90
111
00
12
44
110
00
08
00
109
00
12
84
108
00
12
35
105
00
23
28
104
00
12
98
119@1
00
19
43
119@2
00
33
18
118@1
00
07
33
120@2
00
07
35
125@1
00
05
35
125@2
00
11
47
125@3
00
05
15
125@4
00
06
21
125@5
00
05
19
125@6
00
09
33
125@7
00
04
99
125@8
00
04
35
125@9
00
04
49
136@1
00
11
09
136@3
00
18
78
136@4
00
11
02
137
00
03
67
139
00
07
55
3770
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/6/2018-ओआर-I/ई-23678]
पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव
MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS
New Delhi, the 4th May, 2018
S.O. 800.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural
Gas 2224 dated the 14th September, 2017, issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals
Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act),
Published in the Gazette of India dated the 17th September-23rd September 2017, the Central Government declared its
intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose
of laying Koyali-Ahmednagar-Solapur Pipeline for the transportation of Petroleum Items in Taluka Kopargaon in
Ahmednagar District in the State of Maharashtra by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;
And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public up to 10th January,
2018;
And whereas the competent authority has under sub-section (1) of Section 6 of said act submitted report to the
Central Government;
And Whereas the Central Government, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said
land is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of user therein;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central
Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is
hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central
Government hereby directs that right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the
Central Government, vest on the date of publication of the declaration, in Indian Oil Corporation Limited, free from all
encumbrances.
Indian Oil Corporation Limited shall be exclusively liable for any compensation in terms of Section 10 of the
P & MP Act, 1962 and no suit, claim or legal proceeding would lie against the Central Government on any matter
relating to the pipeline.
SCHEDULE
Tehsil:- Kopargaon
District:- Ahmadnagar
State :- Maharashtra
Mouja / Village
Survey/Block No.
Sub-Div-No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
Sawalgaon
113
00
22
60
112
00
13
45
121/1
00
02
00
121/2
00
00
58
116/2
00
11
05
111
00
14
45
109
00
14
14
27/1
00
05
50
140
00
04
11
141
00
00
24
144
00
00
20
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3771
27/2
00
07
10
27/4
00
06
80
28/1
00
00
74
28/3
00
03
37
25/1
00
05
68
25/2
00
00
02
22
00
03
32
21
00
04
12
20
00
05
31
17/1
00
06
46
14
00
06
41
13
00
05
59
9
00
06
30
8
00
08
78
7
00
03
83
5
00
00
20
6
00
15
58
3/2
00
07
46
2
00
28
68
Tilvani
16/2
00
40
37
14/1
00
16
74
14/2
00
19
14
13
00
17
38
59/1
00
04
93
59/2
00
03
80
60
00
09
75
61
00
01
91
86
00
07
40
87
00
06
29
88/1
00
06
92
89/2
00
03
46
89/3
00
03
45
91/1
00
06
80
91/3
00
03
75
93/1
00
03
49
94
00
12
38
95
00
03
39
96
00
00
20
101/2
00
00
71
3772
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
101/3
00
09
32
101/4
00
10
12
101/5
00
09
65
108
00
08
37
109/1
00
04
13
109/2
00
03
75
111
00
09
21
113
00
08
39
114
00
03
25
117/1
00
27
23
117/2
00
16
74
133
00
30
08
132/1
00
20
84
132/2
00
22
50
216/1
00
00
20
131/1
00
08
82
131/2
00
29
61
218
00
19
10
219/2
00
08
71
219/4
00
08
44
220/1
00
05
79
221/1
00
41
21
221/2
00
07
66
227/1
00
02
63
Aapegaon
57/1
00
14
64
57/4
00
03
57
57/5
00
04
33
55
00
12
96
54
00
06
37
53
00
08
85
52/1
00
05
46
52/2
00
06
93
52/3
00
05
48
50
00
10
61
160/1
00
09
35
160/2
00
07
04
162/1
00
14
75
162/2
00
02
00
163/2
00
00
20
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3773
161/2
00
03
46
165
00
06
79
166
00
05
28
167
00
05
37
155/1
00
07
54
154
00
07
11
183
00
07
85
153
00
10
16
152/2
00
00
57
185
00
14
27
186
00
03
07
147/4
00
00
01
147/5
00
12
37
147/6
00
16
09
188
00
07
78
145/1
00
44
84
145/6
00
08
05
145/7
00
20
09
192/1
00
13
43
193/1
00
14
96
193/2
00
01
25
193/3
00
22
49
201/2
00
05
85
201/3
00
05
59
201/5
00
06
11
201/6
00
00
67
201/8
00
05
23
200/1
00
20
17
Ghoyegaon
43
00
36
28
44/4
00
32
08
45/1
00
05
68
45/2
00
05
89
45/3
00
06
28
46/2
00
07
66
Talegaon Male
70/2
00
01
97
61/1
00
14
90
61/2
00
30
40
60/2
00
01
78
62
00
10
74
3774
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
63
00
11
99
64
00
12
57
65
00
14
09
55
00
03
09
54/1
00
11
60
54/2
00
14
84
53/1
00
14
56
53/2
00
04
49
53/3
00
04
28
53/4
00
04
32
52/1
00
09
08
52/2
00
13
11
52/3
00
20
54
49
00
00
78
51
00
10
90
111
00
12
44
110
00
08
00
109
00
12
84
108
00
12
35
105
00
23
28
104
00
12
98
119/1
00
19
43
119/2
00
33
18
118/1
00
07
33
120/2
00
07
35
125/1
00
05
35
125/2
00
11
47
125/3
00
05
15
125/4
00
06
21
125/5
00
05
19
125/6
00
09
33
125/7
00
04
99
125/8
00
04
35
125/9
00
04
49
136/1
00
11
09
136/3
00
18
78
136/4
00
11
02
137
00
03
67
139
00
07
55
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3775
140
00
04
11
141
00
00
24
144
00
00
20
[F. No. R-11025(11)/6/2018-OR-I/E-23678]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
ubZ fnYyh] 4 ebZ] 2018
dk-vk- 801.—dsUnzh; ljdkj us isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbZu ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½
vf/kfu;e] 1962 ¼1962 dk 50½ ¼ftls blesa blds i'pkr~ mä vf/kfu;e dgk x;k gSa½ dh /kkjk 3 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ ds
v/khu tkjh dh xbZ Hkkjr ljdkj ds isVªksfy;e vkSj izkÑfrd xSl ea=ky; dh vf/klwpuk la[;k dk-vk- 2216 v©j 2217
rkjh[k 14 flrEcj] 2017 tks Hkkjr ds jkti=] rkjh[k 17 flrEcj&23 flrEcj 2017] esa izdkf’kr dh xbZ Fkh }kjk ml
vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa fofufnZ"V Hkwfe esa egkjk"Vª jkT; esa ftyk ukfld esa rkYkqdk ukanxko dks;yh & vgenuxj
& lksykiqj isVªksfy;e ifjogu ds fy, bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs’ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbiykbZu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, mi;ksx
ds vf/kdkj ds vtZu ds vius vk’k; dh ?kks"k.kk dh Fkh (
vkSj mä jkti= vf/kfu;e dh izfr;ka turk dks rkjh[k 27 fnlacj] 2017 rd miyC/k djk nh xbZ Fkh (
vkSj l{ke izkf/kdkjh us mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ ds v/khu dsUæh; ljdkj dks fjiksVZ dh gS (
vkSj dsUæh; ljdkj us] mä fjiksVZ ij fopkj djus ds i'pkr~ vkSj ;g lek/kku gks tkus ij fd mä Hkwfe
ikbiykbZu fcNkus ds fy, visf{kr gS] mlesa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu djus dk fofu’p; fd;k gS (
vr% vc] dsUæh; ljdkj mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk izn~Ùk 'kfä;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, ;g
?kks"k.kk djrh gS fd bl vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa fofufnZ"V Hkwfe esa ikbiykbZu fcNkus ds fy, mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj
dk vtZu fd;k tk, (
vkSj ljdkj mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi&/kkjk ¼4½ }kjk izn~Ùk 'kfä;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] ;g funsZ’k nsrh gS
fd mä Hkwfe esa mi;ksx dk vf/kdkj bl ?kks"k.kk ds izdk’ku dh rkjh[k ls dsUæh; ljdkj esa fufgr gksus ds ctk,] lHkh
foYyaxeksa ls eqä gksdj bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs’ku fyfeVsM esa fufgr gksxh A
isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbZu vf/kfu;e] 1962 dh /kkjk 10 ds v/khu fdlh Hkh {kfriwfrZ ds fy, bafM;u vkW;y
dkWiksZjs’ku fyfeVsM iw.kZr;k mÙkjnk;h gksxh vkSj ikbiykbZu ls lEcfU/kr fdlh Hkh ekeys ij dsUæh; ljdkj ds fo#) dksbZ
okn nkok ;k dkuwuh dk;Zokgh ugha gks ldsxhA
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
rglhy%&ukanxko
ftyk%& ukfld
jkT;%& egkjk"Vª
ekSts @xzke
losZ @ Cykd @ la-
¼IyksV la-½
lc&Mho&la-
{ks=Qy
gsDVj
vkj
oxZ ehVj
1
2
3
4
5
6
dâh
55
00
74
56
51@1
00
37
00
46@1
00
01
97
46@2
00
12
02
45
00
10
50
39
00
09
34
38
00
00
20
40
00
06
32
41
00
03
23
42
00
00
89
3776
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
33
00
15
78
lVk.ks
6@7
00
00
09
6@18
00
03
42
6@10
00
04
69
6@5
00
04
41
6@14
00
04
82
6@1
00
04
41
7@2
00
12
11
7@5
00
02
93
7@6@v@1
00
07
93
7@6@v@2
00
08
37
7@8
00
11
10
7@9
00
03
37
8@1@1@v, c, d
00
12
94
8@1@2@c
00
05
42
8@1@2@v
00
06
67
8@3@c
00
06
69
8@3 d
00
06
96
9@2
00
10
29
9@3
00
09
37
9@4
00
16
93
10@1@c@2
00
08
92
10@1@v
00
06
80
10@1@c@4
00
07
11
10@3
00
06
55
11@4
00
05
49
13@2
00
01
01
13@3
00
00
55
14@1
00
05
44
14@2
00
06
86
14@3
00
16
31
14@7
00
09
41
14@11
00
05
81
14@12
00
34
31
14@13
00
00
41
15
00
42
52
oatkjokMh
237@1 iSdh
00
50
81
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3777
237@2
00
42
20
236
00
19
03
193
00
06
16
192
00
04
61
191
00
04
52
190@2
00
05
98
185
00
09
14
183
00
04
63
182
00
03
56
179
00
07
59
165
00
17
97
166
00
03
83
153@1
00
14
14
153@2
00
79
64
139
00
49
18
138@1
00
01
80
129@7
00
14
53
128
00
26
53
126
00
00
39
127
00
19
09
119
00
31
19
124@1
00
34
15
121
00
26
72
Ukkxkiqj
12@1
00
20
55
12@2@1@2@v
00
17
85
12@2@1@2@c
00
07
24
12@3
00
07
82
12@4
00
11
03
12@8@c
00
08
21
12@8@v
00
08
20
12@11@1
00
07
26
9@1@v, c@2
00
17
92
9@1@c@1
00
07
57
9@2@3@4@1@ c@2
00
02
74
9@2@3@4@1@v
00
09
82
9@2@3@4@2@v@2@1
00
07
18
9@2@3@4@2@v@2@2
00
03
62
3778
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
8@2@v@1
00
06
50
8@1@v@2
00
06
46
8@1@ c
00
04
12
8@1@d
00
02
72
8@3@c
00
02
19
7@1@1@1
00
10
15
7@1@1@2
00
09
82
6@2@v@1@2
00
04
91
6@2@v@1@1
00
04
86
6@3@v@2
00
04
95
6@3@v@1
00
04
86
5@1@2@5@6@v@1
00
05
16
5@1@2@5@6@v@2
00
14
29
4@2@1@v
4@4
00
00
08
09
51
94
3@1@2@d
00
22
86
32
00
24
08
31@1 iS
00
11
64
38@v@1
00
09
30
38@v@2
00
09
07
49@1@1
00
11
59
50v@1
00
09
22
51@5
00
12
92
51@2
00
14
36
52@1@v@1@M
00
06
88
52@1@v@1@v
00
05
51
52@6@v
00
03
49
52@9
00
03
49
52@8
00
07
46
53@1@v@1
00
13
33
53@1@v@3
00
12
47
58@1@d
00
13
57
58@1@c
00
12
42
59@1
00
05
87
59@2
00
07
33
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3779
59@1@3
00
06
38
59@4
00
06
87
60@3@v@2
00
03
14
60@2@1
00
17
85
60@2@2
00
12
78
61@1@1@d
00
14
61
61@1@1@c
00
07
70
61@1@1@V
00
03
74
61@1@1@M
00
04
60
63@1@d@2@v
00
11
53
63@1@d@2@ c
00
07
01
63@2
00
15
99
63@3
00
24
25
63@1@c@2
00
00
78
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/6/2018-ओआर-I/ई-23678]
पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 4th May, 2018
S.O. 801.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural
Gas vide S.O. No. 2216 and 2217 dated the 14th September, 2017, issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the
Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred
to as the said Act), Published in the Gazette of India dated the 17th September-23rd September 2017, the Central
Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that
notification for the purpose of laying Koyali-Ahmednagar-Solapur Pipeline for the transportation of Petroleum
Products in Taluka Nandgaon in Nashik District in the State of Maharashtra by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;
And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public up to 27th December,
2017;
And whereas the competent authority has under sub-section (1) of Section 6 of said act submitted report to the
Central Government;
And Whereas the Central Government, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said
land is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of user therein;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central
Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is
hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central
Government hereby directs that right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the
Central Government, vest on the date of publication of the declaration, in Indian Oil Corporation Limited, free from all
encumbrances.
Indian Oil Corporation Limited shall be exclusively liable for any compensation in terms of Section 10 of the
P & MP Act, 1962 and no suit, claim or legal proceeding would lie against the Central Government on any matter
relating to the pipeline.
3780
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
SCHEDULE
Tehsil:- Nandgaon
District:- Nashik
State :- Maharashtra
Mouje / Village
Survey/Block No.
Sub-Div-No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
Karhi
55
00
74
56
51/1
00
37
00
46/1
00
01
97
46/2
00
12
02
45
00
10
50
39
00
09
34
38
00
00
20
40
00
06
32
41
00
03
23
42
00
00
89
33
00
15
78
Satane
6/7
00
00
09
6/18
00
03
42
6/10
00
04
69
6/5
00
04
41
6/14
00
04
82
6/1
00
04
41
7/2
00
12
11
7/5
00
02
93
7/6/A/1
00
07
93
7/6/A/2
00
08
37
7/8
00
11
10
7/9
00
03
37
8/1/1/A, B, C
00
12
94
8/1/2/B
00
05
42
8/1/2/A
00
06
67
8/3/B
00
06
69
8/3/C
00
06
96
9/2
00
10
29
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3781
9/3
00
09
37
9/4
00
16
93
10/1/B/2
00
08
92
10/1/A
00
06
80
10/1/B/4
00
07
11
10/3
00
06
55
11/4
00
05
49
13/2
00
01
01
13/3
00
00
55
14/1
00
05
44
14/2
00
06
86
14/3
00
16
31
14/7
00
09
41
14/11
00
05
81
14/12
00
34
31
14/13
00
00
41
15
00
42
52
Wanjarwadi
237/1 PAIKY
00
50
81
237/2
00
42
20
236
00
19
03
193
00
06
16
192
00
04
61
191
00
04
52
190/2
00
05
98
185
00
09
14
183
00
04
63
182
00
03
56
179
00
07
59
165
00
17
97
166
00
03
83
153/1
00
14
14
153/2
00
79
64
139
00
49
18
138/1
00
01
80
3782
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
129/7
00
14
53
128
00
26
53
126
00
00
39
127
00
19
09
119
00
31
19
124/1
00
34
15
121
00
26
72
Nagapur
12/1
00
20
55
12/2/1/2/A
00
17
85
12/2/1/2/B
00
07
24
12/3
00
07
82
12/4
00
11
03
12/8/ B
00
08
21
12/8/ A
00
08
20
12/11/1
00
07
26
9/1/ A & 9/1/ B/2
00
17
92
9/1/ B/1
00
07
57
9/2/3/4/1/ B/2
00
02
74
9/2/3/4/1/ A
00
09
82
9/2/3/4/2/ A/2/1
00
07
18
9/2/3/4/2/ A/2/2
00
03
62
8/2/A/1
00
06
50
8/1/A/2
00
06
46
8/1/B
00
04
12
8/1/C
00
02
72
8/3/B
00
02
19
7/1/1/1
00
10
15
7/1/1/2
00
09
82
6/2/A/1/2
00
04
91
6/2/A/1/1
00
04
86
6/3/A/2
00
04
95
6/3/A/1
00
04
86
5/1/2/5/6/A/1
00
05
16
5/1/2/5/6/ A/2
00
14
29
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3783
4/2/1/ A
00
08
51
4/4
00
09
94
3/1/2/C
00
22
86
32
00
24
08
31/1P
00
11
64
38/A/1
00
09
30
38/A/2
00
09
07
49/1/1
00
11
59
50A/1
00
09
22
51/5
00
12
92
51/2
00
14
36
52/1/ A/1/D
00
06
88
52/1/A/1/A
00
05
51
52/6/A
00
03
49
52/9
00
03
49
52/8
00
07
46
53/1/A/1
00
13
33
53/1/A/3
00
12
47
58/1/C
00
13
57
58/1/B
00
12
42
59/1
00
05
87
59/2
00
07
33
59/1/3
00
06
38
59/4
00
06
87
60/3/A/2
00
03
14
60/2/1
00
17
85
60/2/2
00
12
78
61/1/1/C
00
14
61
61/1/1/B
00
07
70
61/1/1/T
00
03
74
61/1/1/D
00
04
60
3784
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
63/1/C/2/A
00
11
53
63/1/C/2/B
00
07
01
63/2
00
15
99
63/3
00
24
25
63/1/B/2
00
00
78
[F. No. R-11025(11)/6/2018-OR-I/E-23678]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
नई दली, 4 मई, 2018
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 802
802
802
802. —dsUnzh; ljdkj us isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbZu ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½
vf/kfu;e] 1962 ¼1962 dk 50½ ¼ftls blesa blds i'pkr~ mä vf/kfu;e dgk x;k gSa½ dh /kkjk 3 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ ds
v/khu tkjh dh xbZ Hkkjr ljdkj ds isVªksfy;e vkSj izkÑfrd xSl ea=ky; dh vf/klwpuk la[;k dk-vk- 2227 rkjh[k 18
flrEcj] 2017 tks Hkkjr ds jkti=] rkjh[k 17 flrEcj&23 flrEcj 2017] esa izdkf’kr dh xbZ Fkh }kjk ml vf/klwpuk ls
layXu vuqlwph esa fofufnZ"V Hkwfe esa egkjk"Vª jkT; esa ftyk vkSjaxkckn esa rkYkqdk oStkiqj dks;yh & vgenuxj & lksykiqj
isVªksfy;e ifjogu ds fy, bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs’ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbiykbZu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj
ds vtZu ds vius vk’k; dh ?kks"k.kk dh Fkh (
vkSj mä jkti= vf/kfu;e dh izfr;ka turk dks rkjh[k 30 fnlacj] 2017 rd miyC/k djk nh xbZ Fkh (
vkSj l{ke izkf/kdkjh us mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ ds v/khu dsUæh; ljdkj dks fjiksVZ dh gS (
vkSj dsUæh; ljdkj us] mä fjiksVZ ij fopkj djus ds i'pkr~ vkSj ;g lek/kku gks tkus ij fd mä Hkwfe
ikbiykbZu fcNkus ds fy, visf{kr gS] mlesa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu djus dk fofu’p; fd;k gS (
vr% vc] dsUæh; ljdkj mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk izn~Ùk 'kfä;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, ;g
?kks"k.kk djrh gS fd bl vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa fofufnZ"V Hkwfe esa ikbiykbZu fcNkus ds fy, mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj
dk vtZu fd;k tk, (
vkSj ljdkj mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi&/kkjk ¼4½ }kjk izn~Ùk 'kfä;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] ;g funsZ’k nsrh gS
fd mä Hkwfe esa mi;ksx dk vf/kdkj bl ?kks"k.kk ds izdk’ku dh rkjh[k ls dsUæh; ljdkj esa fufgr gksus ds ctk,] lHkh
foYyaxeksa ls eqä gksdj bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs’ku fyfeVsM esa fufgr gksxh A
isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbZu vf/kfu;e] 1962 dh /kkjk 10 ds v/khu fdlh Hkh {kfriwfrZ ds fy, bafM;u vkW;y
dkWiksZjs’ku fyfeVsM iw.kZr;k mÙkjnk;h gksxh vkSj ikbiykbZu ls lEcfU/kr fdlh Hkh ekeys ij dsUæh; ljdkj ds fo#) dksbZ
okn nkok ;k dkuwuh dk;Zokgh ugha gks ldsxhA
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
rglhy%&oStkiqj
ftyk%& vkSjaxkckn
jkT;%& egkjk"Vª
ekSts @xzke
losZ @ Cykd @ la-
¼IyksV la-½
lc&Mho&la-
{ks=Qy
gsDVj
vkj
oxZ ehVj
1
2
3
4
5
6
lqjkYkk
262
00
05
38
261
00
20
97
260
00
11
31
256
00
31
56
252
00
10
87
251
00
50
94
250
00
33
92
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3785
277
00
23
81
275
00
14
87
274
00
03
59
278
00
34
66
243
00
00
68
236
00
22
98
242
00
00
60
241
00
14
32
238
00
32
20
117
00
20
25
118
00
55
88
120
00
21
57
124
00
24
22
125
00
10
04
126
00
09
41
127
00
03
93
163
00
12
86
164
00
14
95
165
00
12
35
171
00
13
52
172
00
27
48
175
00
25
44
176
00
06
41
dhjRkIkqj
67
00
37
07
60
00
28
61
61
00
37
79
58
00
27
70
47
00
15
56
48
00
44
36
49
00
02
68
45
00
38
06
44
00
07
96
Hkmj
134
00
07
64
xk¢¸kxkaOk
18
00
27
41
17
00
26
90
15
00
13
53
43
00
00
20
44
00
12
58
50
00
20
50
3786
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
51
00
18
11
52
00
10
66
54
00
22
32
56
00
18
77
68
00
12
26
65
00
13
86
66
00
02
93
62
00
14
18
61
00
10
53
105
00
31
49
107
00
16
61
108
00
17
10
111
00
17
08
112
00
18
28
113
00
01
94
YkkMXkkao
307
00
06
02
308
00
14
00
305
00
28
96
304
00
09
35
294
00
92
44
292
00
52
70
283
00
56
07
226
00
17
62
227
00
37
71
228
00
13
11
234
00
11
96
235
00
07
94
237
00
10
44
194
00
12
99
193
00
14
08
182
00
12
70
181
00
12
79
180
00
27
82
179
00
25
15
178
00
18
72
177
00
14
25
174
00
36
53
173
00
08
79
172
00
10
68
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3787
171
00
16
33
170
00
17
96
169
00
07
24
167
00
07
70
lko[k¢M XkaXkk
179
00
76
16
180
00
24
51
181
00
24
52
182
00
12
54
183
00
14
17
184
00
29
80
186
00
19
14
187
00
16
43
188
00
48
08
189
00
18
20
190
00
18
22
191
00
15
94
193
00
31
09
192
00
02
55
195
00
00
31
194
00
50
83
146
00
29
04
147
00
18
03
145
00
53
11
144
00
11
84
136
00
57
30
135
00
63
50
116
00
40
88
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/6/2018-ओआर-I/ई-23678]
पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 4th May, 2018
S.O. 802.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural
Gas vide S.O. No. 2227 dated the 18th September, 2017, issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and
Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said
Act), Published in the Gazette of India dated the 17th September-23rd September, 2017, the Central Government
declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for
the purpose of laying Koyali-Ahmednagar-Solapur Pipeline for the transportation of Petroleum Products in Aurangabad
District in the State of Maharashtra by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;
And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public up to 30th December,
2017;
And whereas the competent authority has under sub-section (1) of Section 6 of said act submitted report to the
Central Government;
3788
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
And Whereas the Central Government, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said
land is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of user therein;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central
Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is
hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central
Government hereby directs that right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the
Central Government, vest on the date of publication of the declaration, in Indian Oil Corporation Limited, free from all
encumbrances.
Indian Oil Corporation Limited shall be exclusively liable for any compensation in terms of Section 10 of the
P & MP Act, 1962 and no suit, claim or legal proceeding would lie against the Central Government on any matter
relating to the pipeline.
SCHEDULE
Tehsil:- Vaijapur
District:- Aurangabad
State :- Maharashtra
Mouja / Village
Survey/Block No.
Sub-Div-No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
Surala
262
00
05
38
261
00
20
97
260
00
11
31
256
00
31
56
252
00
10
87
251
00
50
94
250
00
33
92
277
00
23
81
275
00
14
87
274
00
03
59
278
00
34
66
243
00
00
68
236
00
22
98
242
00
00
60
241
00
14
32
238
00
32
20
117
00
20
25
118
00
55
88
120
00
21
57
124
00
24
22
125
00
10
04
126
00
09
41
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3789
127
00
03
93
163
00
12
86
164
00
14
95
165
00
12
35
171
00
13
52
172
00
27
48
175
00
25
44
176
00
06
41
Keeratpur
67
00
37
07
60
00
28
61
61
00
37
79
58
00
27
70
47
00
15
56
48
00
44
36
49
00
02
68
45
00
38
06
44
00
07
96
Bhaur
134
00
07
64
Goygaon
18
00
27
41
17
00
26
90
15
00
13
53
43
00
00
20
44
00
12
58
50
00
20
50
51
00
18
11
52
00
10
66
54
00
22
32
56
00
18
77
68
00
12
26
65
00
13
86
66
00
02
93
62
00
14
18
61
00
10
53
105
00
31
49
107
00
16
61
3790
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
108
00
17
10
111
00
17
08
112
00
18
28
113
00
01
94
Ladgaon
307
00
06
02
308
00
14
00
305
00
28
96
304
00
09
35
294
00
92
44
292
00
52
70
283
00
56
07
226
00
17
62
227
00
37
71
228
00
13
11
234
00
11
96
235
00
07
94
237
00
10
44
194
00
12
99
193
00
14
08
182
00
12
70
181
00
12
79
180
00
27
82
179
00
25
15
178
00
18
72
177
00
14
25
174
00
36
53
173
00
08
79
172
00
10
68
171
00
16
33
170
00
17
96
169
00
07
24
167
00
07
70
Sawkheda Ganga
179
00
76
16
180
00
24
51
181
00
24
52
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3791
182
00
12
54
183
00
14
17
184
00
29
80
186
00
19
14
187
00
16
43
188
00
48
08
189
00
18
20
190
00
18
22
191
00
15
94
193
00
31
09
192
00
02
55
195
00
00
31
194
00
50
83
146
00
29
04
147
00
18
03
145
00
53
11
144
00
11
84
136
00
57
30
135
00
63
50
116
00
40
88
[F. No. R-11025(11)/6/2018-OR-I/E-23678]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
नई दली, 4 मई, 2018
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 803
803
803
803. —dsUnzh; ljdkj us isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbZu ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½
vf/kfu;e] 1962 ¼1962 dk 50½ ¼ftls blesa blds i'pkr~ mä vf/kfu;e dgk x;k gSa½ dh /kkjk 3 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ ds
v/khu tkjh dh xbZ Hkkjr ljdkj ds isVªksfy;e vkSj izkÑfrd xSl ea=ky; dh vf/klwpuk la[;k dk-vk- 2219 rkjh[k 14
flrEcj] 2017 tks Hkkjr ds jkti=] rkjh[k 17 flrEcj & 23 flrEcj 2017 esa izdkf’kr dh xbZ Fkh }kjk ml vf/klwpuk
ls layXu vuqlwph esa fofufnZ"V Hkwfe esa egkjk"Vª jkT; esa ftyk ukfld esa rkYkqdk ;soyk dks;yh & vgenuxj & lksykiqj
isVªksfy;e ifjogu ds fy, bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs’ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbiykbZu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj
ds vtZu ds vius vk’k; dh ?kks"k.kk dh Fkh (
vkSj mä jkti= vf/kfu;e dh izfr;ka turk dks rkjh[k 04 tuojh] 2018 rd miyC/k djk nh xbZ Fkh (
vkSj l{ke izkf/kdkjh us mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ ds v/khu dsUæh; ljdkj dks fjiksVZ dh gS (
vkSj dsUæh; ljdkj us] mä fjiksVZ ij fopkj djus ds i'pkr~ vkSj ;g lek/kku gks tkus ij fd mä Hkwfe
ikbiykbZu fcNkus ds fy, visf{kr gS] mlesa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu djus dk fofu’p; fd;k gS (
vr% vc] dsUæh; ljdkj mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk izn~Ùk 'kfä;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, ;g
?kks"k.kk djrh gS fd bl vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa fofufnZ"V Hkwfe esa ikbiykbZu fcNkus ds fy, mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj
dk vtZu fd;k tk, (
3792
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
vkSj ljdkj mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi&/kkjk ¼4½ }kjk izn~Ùk 'kfä;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] ;g funsZ’k nsrh gS
fd mä Hkwfe esa mi;ksx dk vf/kdkj bl ?kks"k.kk ds izdk’ku dh rkjh[k ls dsUæh; ljdkj esa fufgr gksus ds ctk,] lHkh
foYyaxeksa ls eqä gksdj bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs’ku fyfeVsM esa fufgr gksxh A
isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbZu vf/kfu;e] 1962 dh /kkjk 10 ds v/khu fdlh Hkh {kfriwfrZ ds fy, bafM;u vkW;y
dkWiksZjs’ku fyfeVsM iw.kZr;k mÙkjnk;h gksxh vkSj ikbiykbZu ls lEcfU/kr fdlh Hkh ekeys ij dsUæh; ljdkj ds fo#) dksbZ
okn nkok ;k dkuwuh dk;Zokgh ugha gks ldsxhA
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
rglhy%&;soyk
ftyk%& ukfld
jkT;%& egkjk"Vª
ekStk @xzke
losZ @ Cykd @ la-
¼IyksV la-½
lc&Mho&la-
{ks=Qy
gsDVs;j
vkjs
oxZ ehVj
1
2
3
4
5
6
olaruxj
21@1
00
23
71
21@2
00
17
07
18@1
00
01
72
22@1
00
00
20
25@1
00
00
48
25@2
00
36
27
24
00
06
56
26
00
35
32
27@1
00
00
25
27@2
00
26
93
27@3
00
27
07
14@2
00
58
36
13@1
00
56
50
13@2
00
36
00
31
00
55
26
32
00
10
60
33@1
00
31
14
33@2
00
16
59
33@3
00
13
09
33@4
00
16
14
1
00
79
52
4
00
74
03
dqlekM+h
433 iSdh
00
25
76
400
00
23
42
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3793
399
00
23
42
394
00
26
49
393
00
17
68
391
00
10
43
390@2
00
06
67
390@3
00
05
07
389
00
07
99
387
00
08
45
385
00
29
30
382
00
00
20
374
00
31
16
373
00
00
71
368
00
04
33
367
00
09
89
363
00
22
68
364
00
25
37
362
00
00
35
359
00
16
29
/kkeksM+s
72
00
25
00
77
00
03
45
78@1
00
12
55
79@1
00
06
70
79@2@c
00
06
72
82@2
00
05
82
84
00
08
41
87
00
09
31
89@1@v
00
08
21
89@1@c
00
08
80
90@2
00
30
78
91@1
00
20
86
91@2
00
30
07
94@1
00
23
37
3794
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
94@2@2@c
00
06
33
94@2@3@d
00
06
00
94@2@4@M
00
05
22
94@2@5@b
00
05
22
112
00
05
45
145
00
01
69
144
00
05
48
131
00
12
29
130
00
11
75
227@1@v
00
11
27
230
00
14
24
229
00
09
33
228
00
29
36
237
00
13
32
236
00
15
28
333
00
30
29
255@1
00
17
51
255@2
00
03
89
268
00
14
57
269
00
00
20
329
00
32
31
328@1
00
13
37
328@2
00
15
98
328@3
00
22
19
319@2
00
06
64
279
00
01
37
280
00
15
71
281
00
11
09
282
00
07
13
288
00
33
28
289
00
13
64
316@1@v
00
15
99
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3795
316@2@c
00
12
82
316@2
00
15
75
293
00
04
70
315@1
00
00
20
294
00
15
64
295
00
12
33
296
00
07
35
297
00
06
96
298
00
07
39
300@1
00
04
34
299
00
41
93
x.ks'kiqj
48
00
15
49
49
00
01
68
uxjlqy
1046@1
00
09
98
1045
00
30
85
1043
00
23
02
1042
00
10
93
1041
00
05
58
1040
00
06
51
1039
00
04
16
1038
00
12
49
ekrqyBk.k
243@2
00
10
03
243@3
00
01
88
243@5
00
09
40
243@6
00
27
02
247@1
00
10
49
247@2
00
19
05
250@1
00
03
55
250@2
00
12
19
251@v
00
08
45
251@c
00
03
54
253
00
02
77
3796
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
240
00
26
07
239
00
11
75
237
00
13
63
236@1
00
02
58
256@v
00
22
45
228
00
53
24
227@2@2
00
04
64
212
00
01
40
210@1
00
06
03
210@2
00
21
30
211
00
12
02
214
00
02
07
213
00
09
49
214iSdh
00
11
15
221
00
22
75
173
00
09
42
160
00
00
91
162@1
00
17
02
161
00
12
01
159@v
00
04
09
159@M
00
39
99
159@,Q
00
10
27
159@ts
00
04
84
158@1
00
11
85
153
00
08
45
152@2
00
13
69
152@3
00
15
96
cYgsxkao
17@1
00
03
14
18
00
46
88
20@1c
00
02
02
20@1d@1
00
25
77
20@1d@2
00
11
11
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3797
20@2c
00
12
53
51@1c
00
00
54
50@1@1v
00
08
16
50@1@1c
00
09
19
50@1@3@2
00
09
61
50@1@2
00
10
12
48@1
00
18
59
48@3
00
14
80
46@3v
00
12
91
47@1v
00
13
18
47@1c
00
15
72
47@2
00
06
72
43@1v
00
21
98
43@1c
00
02
49
43@2c
00
22
28
55@2@1
00
01
72
42@1
00
00
44
56@@1@2@A
00
31
40
56@1@2@c@2
00
19
81
56@1@2@c@1
00
07
18
58@1@3
00
14
56
58@1@4
00
15
14
58@2
00
03
44
59
00
31
43
60@1c
00
27
46
60@2@v
00
01
73
61@3c
00
04
10
/kke.kxkao
117
00
02
58
116
00
12
09
114
00
00
20
115@1
00
14
96
115@2
00
15
67
3798
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
99
00
33
03
98
00
19
90
100@1
00
04
03
94@v@2
00
40
47
94@v@1
00
19
74
94@c
00
05
75
93
00
00
20
86@1
00
11
26
87
00
17
01
88@1@1
00
10
11
88@1@2
00
04
11
69@1
00
14
61
69@1@1
00
00
05
68@v
00
14
44
68@v@1
00
15
19
68@c@1
00
17
53
vanjlqy
861@1
00
00
28
862@1
00
11
58
862@2
00
14
44
862@3@2
00
17
72
863@1
00
00
35
863@2
00
16
45
863@3
00
12
86
863@4
00
10
05
864@2
00
28
68
870
00
09
17
869@1@1
00
00
77
869@1@2
00
02
33
867@1
00
30
45
867@2
00
21
00
866
00
02
97
824@1
00
42
82
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3799
823@1@1
00
02
34
823@1@2
00
11
36
823@1@3
00
16
18
823@2
00
09
32
822@2c@2@1
00
09
51
822@2c@2@2
00
05
53
822@1v@2$822@1c@2
00
15
46
749@1
00
06
02
749@2
00
20
97
754
00
19
87
753@1
00
12
92
753@2
00
18
93
753@3
00
03
56
752
00
34
37
743@2
00
13
66
756@1
00
05
37
757@1
00
02
70
720@1
00
17
19
720@2
00
28
26
721@2
00
01
57
724@2
00
28
06
724@5
00
10
50
723@1
00
21
43
723@3
00
23
16
723@5
00
03
66
624@1@v
00
21
35
624@3
00
13
96
624@4@1
00
12
85
623@1
00
31
66
623@2
00
31
94
589@5
00
02
25
589@6
00
32
59
3800
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
588@1v@2@1
00
09
41
588@1v@2@2
00
10
86
588@1c@1
00
28
47
587@2
00
22
94
582@2
00
03
71
583@1
00
12
30
583@2
00
12
30
586@8
00
31
81
585@1@1
00
26
35
585@1@2
00
13
20
585@1@3
00
05
82
480@2
00
25
27
481@1
00
15
82
482@1@1
00
15
48
482@1@2
00
14
86
482@2
00
12
40
529
00
49
25
528
00
07
11
526@2
00
01
67
527@1
00
22
74
527@4
00
27
35
524
00
13
04
523
00
07
91
522
00
06
76
521
00
33
56
520
00
09
52
519
00
00
64
517@1
00
10
38
518
00
00
20
cksdVs
200@2
00
20
24
198@1@c
00
20
16
197@4¼197@4@5@6½
00
20
38
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3801
197@5¼197@4@5@6½
00
21
11
196@5
00
20
60
196@6
00
06
21
177@3
00
35
93
177@5
00
05
37
129@1] 2] 3] 4
00
40
62
128@3
00
12
30
128@4
00
14
70
132@1
00
21
39
132@2
00
19
15
132@3
00
20
86
133@1@c
00
09
87
133@1@v@2
00
04
68
133@2
00
04
89
134
00
10
64
134@2
00
05
65
135
00
08
46
136
00
09
14
137
00
09
48
71@1
00
02
74
70
00
33
23
69
00
18
55
69@2
00
04
94
67
00
17
26
66
00
08
86
66@2
00
08
65
64
00
35
31
nqxyxkoa
143
00
05
35
142
00
00
49
141
00
13
59
148
00
09
41
138@1
00
11
71
3802
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/6/2018-ओआर-I/ई-23678]
पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 4th May, 2018
S.O. 803.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural
Gas vide S.O. No. 2219 dated the 14th September, 2017, issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and
Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said
Act), Published in the Gazette of India dated the 17th September-23rd September 2017, the Central Government
declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for
the purpose of laying Koyali-Ahmednagar-Solapur Pipeline for the transportation of Petroleum Products in Taluka
Yeola in Nashik District in the State of Maharashtra by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;
And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public up to 4th January 2018;
And whereas the competent authority has under sub-section (1) of Section 6 of said act submitted report to the
Central Government;
And Whereas the Central Government, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said
land is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of user therein;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central
Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is
hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central
Government hereby directs that right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the
Central Government, vest on the date of publication of the declaration, in Indian Oil Corporation Limited, free from all
encumbrances.
Indian Oil Corporation Limited shall be exclusively liable for any compensation in terms of Section 10 of the
P & MP Act, 1962 and no suit, claim or legal proceeding would lie against the Central Government on any matter
relating to the pipeline.
SCHEDULE
137
00
07
38
151
00
35
11
152
00
15
73
35
00
12
03
36
00
03
28
34@1
00
28
58
32
00
44
11
33@c
00
00
20
31@1] 2
00
09
17
Tehsil:- Yeola
District:- Nashik
State :- Maharashtra
Mouja / Village
Survey/Block No.
Sub-Div-No.
Area
Hectare
are
Sq. Mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
Vasantnagar
21/1
00
23
71
21/2
00
17
07
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3803
18/1
00
01
72
22/1
00
00
20
25/1
00
00
48
25/2
00
36
27
24
00
06
56
26
00
35
32
27/1
00
00
25
27/2
00
26
93
27/3
00
27
07
14/2
00
58
36
13/1
00
56
50
13/2
00
36
00
31
00
55
26
32
00
10
60
33/1
00
31
14
33/2
00
16
59
33/3
00
13
09
33/4
00
16
14
1
00
79
52
4
00
74
03
Kusmadi
433 Paiky
00
25
76
400
00
23
42
399
00
23
42
394
00
26
49
393
00
17
68
391
00
10
43
390/2
00
06
67
390/3
00
05
07
389
00
07
99
387
00
08
45
385
00
29
30
382
00
00
20
374
00
31
16
373
00
00
71
368
00
04
33
367
00
09
89
363
00
22
68
3804
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
364
00
25
37
362
00
00
35
359
00
16
29
Dhamode
72
00
25
00
77
00
03
45
78/1
00
12
55
79/1
00
06
70
79/2/B
00
06
72
82/2
00
05
82
84
00
08
41
87
00
09
31
89/1/A
00
08
21
89/1/B
00
08
80
90/2
00
30
78
91/1
00
20
86
91/2
00
30
07
94/1
00
23
37
94/2/2/B
00
06
33
94/2/3/K
00
06
00
94/2/4/D
00
05
22
94/2/5/E
00
05
22
112
00
05
45
145
00
01
69
144
00
05
48
131
00
12
29
130
00
11
75
227/1/A
00
11
27
230
00
14
24
229
00
09
33
228
00
29
36
237
00
13
32
236
00
15
28
333
00
30
29
255/1
00
17
51
255/2
00
03
89
268
00
14
57
269
00
00
20
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3805
329
00
32
31
328/1
00
13
37
328/2
00
15
98
328/3
00
22
19
319/2
00
06
64
279
00
01
37
280
00
15
71
281
00
11
09
282
00
07
13
288
00
33
28
289
00
13
64
316/1/A
00
15
99
316/2/B
00
12
82
316/2
00
15
75
293
00
04
70
315/1
00
00
20
294
00
15
64
295
00
12
33
296
00
07
35
297
00
06
96
298
00
07
39
300/1
00
04
34
299
00
41
93
Ganeshpur
48
00
15
49
49
00
01
68
Nagarsul
1046/1
00
09
98
1045
00
30
85
1043
00
23
02
1042
00
10
93
1041
00
05
58
1040
00
06
51
1039
00
04
16
1038
00
12
49
Matulthan
243/2
00
10
03
243/3
00
01
88
243/5
00
09
40
243/6
00
27
02
3806
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
247/1
00
10
49
247/2
00
19
05
250/1
00
03
55
250/2
00
12
19
251/A
00
08
45
251/B
00
03
54
253
00
02
77
240
00
26
07
239
00
11
75
237
00
13
63
236/1
00
02
58
256/A
00
22
45
228
00
53
24
227/2/2
00
04
64
212
00
01
40
210/1
00
06
03
210/2
00
21
30
211
00
12
02
214
00
02
07
213
00
09
49
214P
00
11
15
221
00
22
75
173
00
09
42
160
00
00
91
162/1
00
17
02
161
00
12
01
159/A
00
04
09
159/D
00
39
99
159/F
00
10
27
159/J
00
04
84
158/1
00
11
85
153
00
08
45
152/2
00
13
69
152/3
00
15
96
Balhegaon
17/1
00
03
14
18
00
46
88
20/1B
00
02
02
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3807
20/1C/1
00
25
77
20/1C/2
00
11
11
20/2B
00
12
53
51/1B
00
00
54
50/1/1A
00
08
16
50/1/1B
00
09
19
50/1/3/2
00
09
61
50/1/2
00
10
12
48/1
00
18
59
48/3
00
14
80
46/3A
00
12
91
47/1A
00
13
18
47/1B
00
15
72
47/2
00
06
72
43/1A
00
21
98
43/1B
00
02
49
43/2B
00
22
28
55/2/1
00
01
72
42/1
00
00
44
56//1/2/A
00
31
40
56/1/2/B/2
00
19
81
56/1/2/B/1
00
07
18
58/1/3
00
14
56
58/1/4
00
15
14
58/2
00
03
44
59
00
31
43
60/1B
00
27
46
60/2/A
00
01
73
61/3B
00
04
10
Dhamangaon
117
00
02
58
116
00
12
09
114
00
00
20
115/1
00
14
96
115/2
00
15
67
99
00
33
03
98
00
19
90
100/1
00
04
03
3808
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
94/A/2
00
40
47
94/A/1
00
19
74
94/B
00
05
75
93
00
00
20
86/1
00
11
26
87
00
17
01
88/1/1
00
10
11
88/1/2
00
04
11
69/1
00
14
61
69/1/1
00
00
05
68/A
00
14
44
68/A/1
00
15
19
68/B/1
00
17
53
Andarsul
861/1
00
00
28
862/1
00
11
58
862/2
00
14
44
862/3/2
00
17
72
863/1
00
00
35
863/2
00
16
45
863/3
00
12
86
863/4
00
10
05
864/2
00
28
68
870
00
09
17
869/1/1
00
00
77
869/1/2
00
02
33
867/1
00
30
45
867/2
00
21
00
866
00
02
97
824/1
00
42
82
823/1/1
00
02
34
823/1/2
00
11
36
823/1/3
00
16
18
823/2
00
09
32
822/2B/2/1
00
09
51
822/2B/2/2
00
05
53
822/1B/2+822/1B/2
00
15
46
749/1
00
06
02
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3809
749/2
00
20
97
754
00
19
87
753/1
00
12
92
753/2
00
18
93
753/3
00
03
56
752
00
34
37
743/2
00
13
66
756/1
00
05
37
757/1
00
02
70
720/1
00
17
19
720/2
00
28
26
721/2
00
01
57
724/2
00
28
06
724/5
00
10
50
723/1
00
21
43
723/3
00
23
16
723/5
00
03
66
624/1/A
00
21
35
624/3
00
13
96
624/4/1
00
12
85
623/1
00
31
66
623/2
00
31
94
589/5
00
02
25
589/6
00
32
59
588/1A/2/1
00
09
41
588/1A/2/2
00
10
86
588/1B/1
00
28
47
587/2
00
22
94
582/2
00
03
71
583/1
00
12
30
583/2
00
12
30
586/8
00
31
81
585/1/1
00
26
35
585/1/2
00
13
20
585/1/3
00
05
82
480/2
00
25
27
481/1
00
15
82
3810
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
482/1/1
00
15
48
482/1/2
00
14
86
482/2
00
12
40
529
00
49
25
528
00
07
11
526/2
00
01
67
527/1
00
22
74
527/4
00
27
35
524
00
13
04
523
00
07
91
522
00
06
76
521
00
33
56
520
00
09
52
519
00
00
64
517/1
00
10
38
518
00
00
20
Bokate
200/2
00
20
24
198/1/B
00
20
16
197/4(197/4/5/6)
00
20
38
197/5(197/4/5/6)
00
21
11
196/5
00
20
60
196/6
00
06
21
177/3
00
35
93
177/5
00
05
37
129/1, 2, 3, 4
00
40
62
128/3
00
12
30
128/4
00
14
70
132/1
00
21
39
132/2
00
19
15
132/3
00
20
86
133/1/B
00
09
87
133/1/A/2
00
04
68
133/2
00
04
89
134
00
10
64
134/2
00
05
65
135
00
08
46
136
00
09
14
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3811
[F. No. R-11025(11)/6/2018-OR-I/E-23678]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
नई दली, 15 मई, 2018
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 804
804
804
804.—क8ीय सरकार को ऐसा तीत होता है क लोक िहत म8 यह आवTयक है क तेलंगाना राय म8 पेSोिलयम
उपाद के प*रवहन के िलए पारादीप - हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन प*रयोजना के qयावयन हेतु इंिडयन ऑयल कॉप@रेशन िलिमटेड ारा
पाइपलाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए;
और क8 ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन िबछाने के योजन के िलए यह आवTयक तीत होता है क ऐसी भूिम म8 जो इस से
उपाबV अनुसूची म8 वXणत है, और िजसम8 उw पाइपलाइन िबछाई जाने का Uताव है, उपयोग के अिधकार का अज-न कया जाए;
अतः अब, केीय सरकार, पेSोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइस (भूिम म8 उपयोग के अिधकार का अज-न) अिधिनयम 1962
(1962 का 50) क धारा 3 क उपधारा (1) ारा द शिwय का योग करते ए उस भूिम म8 उपयोग के अिधकार का अज-न करने के
अपने आशय क घोषणा करती है;
कोई भी िw, जो उw अनुसूची म8 वXणत भूिम म8 िहतबV है, उस तारीख से, िजसको इस अिधसूचना म8 युw भारत के
राजप7 क ितयाँ साधारण जनता को उपलlध करा दी जाती हW, इस (21) दन के भीतर, भूिम के नीचे पाइपलाइन िबछाए जाने के
137
00
09
48
71/1
00
02
74
70
00
33
23
69
00
18
55
69/2
00
04
94
67
00
17
26
66
00
08
86
66/2
00
08
65
64
00
35
31
Dugalgaon
143
00
05
35
142
00
00
49
141
00
13
59
148
00
09
41
138/1
00
11
71
137
00
07
38
151
00
35
11
152
00
15
73
35
00
12
03
36
00
03
28
34/1
00
28
58
32
00
44
11
33/B
00
00
20
31/1, 2
00
09
17
3812
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
िलए उसम8 उपयोग के अिधकार के संबध म8 0ी एम. नारायणा राव, सdम ािधकारी (तेलंगाना), इंिडयन ऑयल कॉप@रेशन िलिमटेड
(पाइपलाइन भाग), पारादीप-हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन प*रयोजना, ]लॉट संया 264/ए, दूसरी मंिजल, कैनरा बWक के ऊपर, माग- संया
10, जुिबली िहस, हैदराबाद-500033, तेलंगाना राय को िलिखत Fप से आdेप भेज सकेगा ।
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
िजला: यादाी भुवनिग*र
राय: तेलंगाना
मंडल का नाम
nाम का नाम
सवx नrबर
dे7फल
हेटेयर
एयर
वग- मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
बी. पोचमपली
िजlलक पिल
167/1
00
10
85
168
00
25
72
169
00
29
08
176
00
20
77
226
00
54
59
रामपेट
एलिक
153
00
04
66
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/3/2018-ओआर-I/ई-21839]
पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018
S.O. 804.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government, that it is necessary in the public interest that for
the transportation of petroleum products in the State of Telangana a pipeline should be laid for implementing Paradip-
Hyderabad Pipeline Project under Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;
And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is
necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which is
described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and
Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby
declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person who is interested in the land described in the said schedule, may submit objection in writing to
Shri. M. Narayana Rao, Competent Authority (Telangana), Indian Oil Corporation Limited (Pipelines Division),
Paradip Hyderabad Pipeline Project, Plot No. 264/A, 2nd Floor, above Canara Bank, Road No. 10, Jubilee Hills,
Hyderabad - 500 033 within twenty one (21) days from the date on which the copies of this notification issued under
Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the general
public.
SCHEDULE
District : Yadadri Bhongir
State : Telangana
Name of Mandal
Name of Village
Survey No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Square Metre
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
B. Pochampally
Jiblak Palle
167/1
00
10
85
168
00
25
72
169
00
29
08
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3813
176
00
20
77
226
00
54
59
Ramannapet
Yellanki
153
00
04
66
[F. No. R-11025(11)/3/2018-OR-I/E-21839]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
नई दली, 15 मई, 2018
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 805
805
805
805.—क8ीय सरकार को ऐसा तीत होता है क लोक िहत म8 यह आवTयक है क तेलंगाना राय म8 पेSोिलयम
उपाद के प*रवहन के िलए पारादीप - हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन प*रयोजना के qयावयन हेतु इंिडयन ऑयल कॉप@रेशन िलिमटेड ारा
पाइपलाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए;
और क8 ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन िबछाने के योजन के िलए यह आवTयक तीत होता है क ऐसी भूिम म8 जो इस
से उपाबV अनुसूची म8 वXणत है, और िजसम8 उw पाइपलाइन िबछाई जाने का Uताव है, उपयोग के अिधकार का अज-न कया जाए;
अतः अब, केीय सरकार, पेSोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइस (भूिम म8 उपयोग के अिधकार का अज-न) अिधिनयम 1962
(1962 का 50) क धारा 3 क उपधारा (1) ारा द शिwय का योग करते ए उस भूिम म8 उपयोग के अिधकार का अज-न करने के
अपने आशय क घोषणा करती है;
कोई भी िw, जो उw अनुसूची म8 वXणत भूिम म8 िहतबV है, उस तारीख से, िजसको इस अिधसूचना म8 युw भारत के
राजप7 क ितयाँ साधारण जनता को उपलlध करा दी जाती हW, इस (21) दन के भीतर, भूिम के नीचे पाइपलाइन िबछाए जाने के
िलए उसम8 उपयोग के अिधकार के संबध म8 0ी एम. नारायणा राव, सdम ािधकारी (तेलंगाना), इंिडयन ऑयल कॉप@रेशन िलिमटेड
(पाइपलाइन भाग), पारादीप-हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन प*रयोजना, ]लॉट संया 264/ए, दूसरी मंिजल, कैनरा बWक के ऊपर, माग- संया
10, जुिबली िहस, हैदराबाद-500033, तेलंगाना राय को िलिखत Fप से आdेप भेज सकेगा ।
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
िजला: नलगडा राय: तेलंगाना
मंडल का नाम
nाम का नाम
सवx नrबर
dे7फल
हेटेयर
एयर
वग- मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
केतेपली
भीमारम
53
00
18
16
केतेपली
तुंगतुXत
147/27
00
14
57
147/4
00
04
38
12
00
59
60
19
00
34
32
20
00
50
21
केतेपली
चेAकुपली
682
00
19
16
683
00
47
18
472
00
18
14
3814
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
473
00
06
55
474
00
13
69
488
00
05
54
489
00
02
69
487
00
08
99
486
00
15
91
485
00
16
02
484
00
19
82
419
00
17
46
नकरेकल
मF- र
299
00
00
04
300
00
01
11
नाकxटपली
नेrमिन
136
00
32
81
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/3/2018-ओआर-I/ई-21839]
पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018
S.O. 805.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government, that it is necessary in the public interest that for the
transportation of petroleum products in the State of Telangana a pipeline should be laid for implementing Paradip-
Hyderabad Pipeline Project under Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;
And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is
necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which is
described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub Section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and
Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby
declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person who is interested in the land described in the said schedule, may submit objection in writing to Shri.
M. Narayana Rao, Competent Authority (Telangana), Indian Oil Corporation Limited (Pipelines Division), Paradip
Hyderabad Pipeline Project, Plot No. 264/A, 2nd Floor, above Canara Bank, Road No. 10, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad -
500 033 within twenty one (21) days from the date on which the copies of this notification issued under Sub-section (1)
of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the general public.
SCHEDULE
District : Nalgonda
State : Telangana
Name of Mandal
Name of Village
Survey No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Square Metre
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
Kethepally
Bheemaram
53
00
18
16
Kethepally
Thungathurthy
147/27
00
14
57
147/4
00
04
38
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3815
12
00
59
60
19
00
34
32
20
00
50
21
Kethepally
Cherkupally
682
00
19
16
683
00
47
18
472
00
18
14
473
00
06
55
474
00
13
69
488
00
05
54
489
00
02
69
487
00
08
99
486
00
15
91
485
00
16
02
484
00
19
82
419
00
17
46
Nakrekal
Marrur
299
00
00
04
300
00
01
11
Narketpally
Nemmani
136
00
32
81
[F. No. R-11025(11)/3/2018-OR-I/E-21839]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
नई दली, 15 मई, 2018
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 806
806
806
806.—क8ीय सरकार को ऐसा तीत होता है क लोक िहत म8 यह आवTयक है क तेलंगाना राय म8 पेSोिलयम
उपाद के प*रवहन के िलए पारादीप - हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन प*रयोजना के qयावयन हेतु इंिडयन ऑयल कॉप@रेशन िलिमटेड ारा
पाइपलाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए;
और क8 ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन िबछाने के योजन के िलए यह आवTयक तीत होता है क ऐसी भूिम म8 जो इस
से ऊपाबV अनुसूची म8 वXणत है, और िजसम8 उw पाइपलाइन िबछाई जाने का Uताव है, उपयोग के अिधकार का अज-न कया जाए;
अतः अब, केीय सरकार, पेSोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइस (भूिम म8 उपयोग के अिधकार का अज-न) अिधिनयम 1962
(1962 का 50) क धारा 3 क उपधारा (1) ारा द शिwय का योग करते ए उस भूिम म8 उपयोग के अिधकार का अज-न करने के
अपने आशय क घोषणा करती है;
कोई भी िw, जो उw अनुसूची म8 वXणत भूिम म8 िहतबV है, उस तारीख से, िजसको इस अिधसूचना म8 युw भारत के
राजप7 क ितयाँ साधारण जनता को उपलlध करा दी जाती हW, इस (21) दन के भीतर, भूिम के नीचे पाइपलाइन िबछाए जाने के
िलए उसम8 उपयोग के अिधकार के संबध म8 0ी एम. नारायणा राव, सdम ािधकारी (तेलंगाना), इंिडयन ऑयल कॉप@रेशन िलिमटेड
(पाइपलाइन भाग), पारादीप-हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन प*रयोजना, ]लॉट संया 264/ए, दूसरी मंिजल, कैनरा बWक के ऊपर, माग- संया
10, जुिबली िहस, हैदराबाद-500033, तेलंगाना राय को िलिखत Fप से आdेप भेज सकेगा|
3816
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
िजला : खrमम
राय : तेलंगाना
मंडल का नाम
nाम का नाम
सवx नrबर
dे7फल
हेटेयर
एयर
वग- मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
मिधरा
िचलकुA
41
00
46
64
मिधरा
रायापनम
342
00
37
52
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/3/2018-ओआर-I/ई-21839]
पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018
S.O. 806.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government, that it is necessary in the public interest that for
the transportation of petroleum products in the State of Telangana a pipeline should be laid for implementing Paradip-
Hyderabad Pipeline Project under Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;
And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is
necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which is
described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub Section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and
Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby
declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person who is interested in the land described in the said schedule, may submit objection in writing to
Shri. M. Narayana Rao, Competent Authority (Telangana), Indian Oil Corporation Limited (Pipelines Division),
Paradip Hyderabad Pipeline Project, Plot No. 264/A, 2nd Floor, above Canara Bank, Road No. 10, Jubilee Hills,
Hyderabad - 500 033 within twenty one (21) days from the date on which the copies of this notification issued under
Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the general
public.
SCHEDULE
District : Khammam
State : Telangana
Name of Mandal
Name of Village
Survey No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Square Metre
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
Madhira
Chilkuru
41
00
46
64
Madhira
Rayapatnam
342
00
37
52
[F. No. R-11025(11)/3/2018-OR-I/E-21839]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
नई दली, 15 मई, 2018
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 807
807
807
807.—क8ीय सरकार को ऐसा तीत होता है क लोक िहत म8 यह आवTयक है क तेलंगाना राय म8 पेSोिलयम
उपाद के प*रवहन के िलए पारादीप - हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन प*रयोजना के qयावयन हेतु इंिडयन ऑयल कॉप@रेशन िलिमटेड ारा
पाइपलाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए;
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3817
और क8 ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन िबछाने के योजन के िलए यह आवTयक तीत होता है क ऐसी भूिम म8 जो इस से
उपाबV अनुसूची म8 वXणत है, और िजसम8 उw पाइपलाइन िबछाई जाने का Uताव है, उपयोग के अिधकार का अज-न कया जाए;
अतः अब, केीय सरकार, पेSोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइस (भूिम म8 उपयोग के अिधकार का अज-न) अिधिनयम 1962
(1962 का 50) क धारा 3 क उपधारा (1) ारा द शिwय का योग करते ए उस भूिम म8 उपयोग के अिधकार का अज-न करने के
अपने आशय क घोषणा करती है;
कोई भी िw, जो उw अनुसूची म8 वXणत भूिम म8 िहतबV है, उस तारीख से, िजसको इस अिधसूचना म8 युw भारत के
राजप7 क ितयाँ साधारण जनता को उपलlध करा दी जाती हW, इस (21) दन के भीतर, भूिम के नीचे पाइपलाइन िबछाए जाने के
िलए उसम8 उपयोग के अिधकार के संबध म8 0ी एम. नारायणा राव, सdम ािधकारी (तेलंगाना), इंिडयन ऑयल कॉप@रेशन िलिमटेड
(पाइपलाइन भाग), पारादीप-हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन प*रयोजना, ]लॉट संया 264/ए, दूसरी मंिजल, कैनरा बWक के ऊपर, माग- संया
10, जुिबली िहस, हैदराबाद-500033, तेलंगाना राय को िलिखत Fप से आdेप भेज सकेगा ।
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
िजला: सुया-पेट
राय: तेलंगाना
मंडल का नाम
nाम का नाम
सवx नrबर
dे7फल
हेटेयर
एयर
वग- मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
िचलुकूA
िचलुकूA
201
00
00
53
127
00
01
55
377
00
07
97
मुनगाला
गणपवरम
169/5
00
00
17
पेपहाड़
पेपहाड़
94/26
00
04
09
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/3/2018-ओआर-I/ई-21839]
पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018
S.O. 807.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government, that it is necessary in the public interest that for
the transportation of petroleum products in the State of Telangana a pipeline should be laid for implementing Paradip-
Hyderabad Pipeline Project under Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;
And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is
necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which is
described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub Section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and
Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby
declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person who is interested in the land described in the said schedule, may submit objection in writing to
Shri. M. Narayana Rao, Competent Authority (Telangana), Indian Oil Corporation Limited (Pipelines Division),
Paradip Hyderabad Pipeline Project, Plot No. 264/A, 2nd Floor, above Canara Bank, Road No. 10, Jubilee Hills,
Hyderabad - 500 033 within twenty one (21) days from the date on which the copies of this notification issued under
Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the general
public.
3818
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
SCHEDULE
District : Suryapet
State : Telangana
Name of Mandal
Name of Village
Survey No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Square Metre
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
Chilkur
Chilkur
201
00
00
53
127
00
01
55
377
00
07
97
Munagala
Ganapavaram
169/5
00
00
17
Penpahad
Penpahad
94/26
00
04
09
[F. No. R-11025(11)/3/2018-OR-I/E-21839]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
नई दली, 15 मई, 2018
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 808
808
808
808.— केीय सरकार, पेSोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूिम म8 उपयोग के अिधकार का अज-न) अिधिनयम
1962 (1962 का 50) (िजसे इसम8 इसके पात उw अिधिनयम कहा गया है) क धारा 3 क उप-धारा (1) भारत के राजप7,
(असाधारण) के अधीन जारी क गयी भारत सरकार के पेSोिलयम और ाकृितक गैस मं7ालय क अिधसूचना का. आ 563(अ), तारीख
15 फरवरी 2017, ारा तिमलनाडु राय म8 एोर - ितAवलूर - ब8गलुA - पांिडचेरी - नागप*नम - मदुरै - टू*टको*रन पाइपलाइन
िबछाई जानी चािहए के प*रवहन के िलए इंिडयन ऑयल काप@रेशन िलिमटेड के ारा पाइपलाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए;
और उw अिधसूचना क ितयाँ जनता को तारीख 01.03.2017 को उपलl ध करा दी गई थL।
और उw अिधिनयम क धारा 6 क उप - धारा (1) के अनुसरण म8 सdम ािधकारी ने केीय सरकार को अपनी *रपोट- दे दी
है।
और केीय सरकार का उw *रपोट- पर िवचार करने के पात यह समाधान हो गया है क इस अिधसूचना से संल अनुसूची
म8 िविनuदy भूिम म8 उपयोग के अिधकार का अज-न कया जाना चािहए।
अत: अब, केीय सरकार,उw अिधिनयम क धारा 6 क उप-धारा(1) ारा द शिwय का योग करते ए यह घोषणा
करती है क इस अिधसूचना के संल अनुसूची म8 िविनuदy उw भूिम म8 पाइपलाइन िबछाने के िलए उपयोग का अिधकार अXजत कया
जाता है।
यह और क केीय सरकार, उw अिधिनयम क धारा 6 क उप-धारा(4) ारा द शिwय का योग करते ए यह िनदxश
देती है क उw भूिम के उपयोग का अिधकार इस अिधसूचना के काश क तारीख से केीय सरकार म8 िनिहत होने क बजाय, सभी
िवलंगम से मुw हो कर इंिडयन ऑयल कॉप@रेशन िलिमटेड म8 िनिहत होगा।
पैSोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन अिधिनयम, 1962 क धारा 10 के अधीन कसी भी dितपूXत के िलए इंिडयन ऑयल
कॉप@रेशन िलिमटेड पूण-तया उरदायी होगी और पाइपलाइन से सrबिधत कसी भी मामले पर केीय सरकार के िवAV कोई वाद,
दावा या कानूनी काय-वाही नहL हो सकेगी।
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
िजला : रामनाथपुरम
राय : तिमलनाडु
तालुका का नाम
गाँव का नाम
सवxdण सं.
उप ख^ड सं.
dे7फल
हेटेयर
एयर
वग- मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
कडलाड़ी
40 करंदै
251
18
00
03
70
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3819
251
19
00
03
00
251
17
00
10
30
251
9बी
00
06
90
251
10
00
01
25
251
15ए1
00
04
90
251
15ए2
00
00
40
251
11
00
05
60
256
7ए
00
02
70
256
5
00
06
95
256
10ए
00
00
40
256
1
00
05
00
258
3डी
00
04
35
258
3बी
00
02
70
258
3ए
00
01
00
258
2
00
03
45
258
1
00
02
90
259
9बी
00
00
90
259
10
00
07
60
259
7
00
02
95
259
5
00
03
90
259
3ए
00
06
30
259
3बी
00
04
60
265
6
00
03
60
265
7
00
00
40
265
5बी
00
06
80
265
5ए
00
09
55
265
1
00
02
00
270
1
00
00
40
266
2
00
13
00
266
3ए
00
00
40
266
4
00
01
60
266
5
00
05
50
266
6ए
00
01
40
266
7
00
01
20
266
1बी
00
02
45
266
1ए
00
06
00
267
2सी3
00
04
40
267
2सी2
00
06
15
267
2सी1
00
05
05
267
2ए
00
00
65
3820
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
267
4
00
00
40
267
5
00
01
90
150
6ए
00
09
00
173
8ए
00
10
10
173
7ए
00
10
80
173
3सी
00
03
70
173
3डी
00
03
00
173
3ई
00
00
80
173
2बी
00
03
50
173
3जी
00
02
30
173
3एच
00
02
90
173
3आई
00
03
60
173
3जे
00
03
45
173
3के
00
02
90
173
3एल
00
03
40
172
5सी4
00
02
70
172
5बी
00
00
40
172
9
00
06
70
172
7
00
11
85
172
6ए
00
02
25
172
6बी
00
10
00
158
1
00
01
20
170
5बी
00
06
50
159
2बी
00
02
80
159
2ए
00
04
35
159
1सी
00
17
20
159
1बी
00
01
35
166
10ए1ए
00
06
40
166
10ए1बी
00
10
00
166
10ए1सी
00
00
90
166
7
00
08
30
166
8ए
00
09
70
104
1
00
00
60
104
2
00
13
65
104
3
00
01
25
78
7
00
10
45
103
3बी
00
12
25
103
3सी
00
03
10
103
2बी
00
06
80
105
1
00
01
45
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3821
102
1बी2
00
08
00
102
2
00
12
00
102
3
00
13
00
101
10
00
01
55
106
1डी
00
00
50
106
1सी
00
03
60
106
1बी
00
04
35
106
1ए
00
03
10
110
1ए
00
11
15
98
2बी
00
02
00
98
1ई
00
03
30
98
1एफ1
00
09
80
98
1एफ2
00
02
55
98
1एफ3
00
01
35
113
7बी
00
00
80
113
7ए
00
01
40
113
4
00
04
20
113
3सी
00
00
40
113
5
00
05
70
113
2
00
00
60
113
6
00
04
45
113
1सी2
00
07
35
113
1सी1
00
04
85
113
1बी
00
00
70
116
1
00
13
00
115
3
00
10
45
127
00
04
60
430
13
00
04
15
430
14
00
09
30
430
7
00
03
35
430
6
00
03
85
430
5
00
06
10
430
4
00
00
40
433
1
00
00
40
432
14
00
06
90
432
13
00
03
40
432
11
00
06
50
432
9
00
07
10
432
10
00
00
45
432
8
00
00
60
3822
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
432
6
00
00
40
436
00
04
50
425
1
00
26
10
19
7
00
11
70
2
8
00
06
95
2
9
00
00
40
2
10
00
13
15
2
7
00
25
90
कडलाड़ी
23 वोरीवयल
252
00
32
60
253
1
00
06
80
248
2
00
20
50
248
1
00
14
00
249
1
00
16
75
158
2
00
00
40
158
1
00
13
25
154
1सी
00
01
30
154
1बी
00
04
45
154
1ए
00
09
75
153
3
00
20
90
153
1
00
00
50
153
2
00
27
00
151
4
00
09
20
151
3
00
09
55
150
5
00
14
95
150
2
00
11
60
149
4
00
16
70
149
1
00
04
50
148
00
07
20
147
2
00
06
70
147
1
00
07
00
146
2
00
07
60
146
1
00
06
90
145
2
00
13
70
24
3
00
05
45
24
24
00
01
00
24
2सी4
00
03
70
24
23
00
00
40
24
2सी3
00
06
40
24
2सी2
00
06
75
24
2बी3
00
02
40
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3823
24
2बी2
00
04
15
24
2बी1
00
04
85
24
19
00
08
80
24
18
00
04
60
24
17
00
07
20
24
2ए2
00
05
20
24
2ए1
00
09
00
23
2
00
10
90
22
3ई
00
05
40
22
3एफ
00
03
20
21
2बी2
00
00
45
21
2बी1
00
02
25
21
2ए2
00
03
00
21
2ए3
00
04
20
21
2ए1
00
06
85
21
3ए
00
00
65
21
1ए
00
05
75
कडलाड़ी
22 मारंदै
380
00
07
55
382
3बी
00
03
70
382
4बी
00
12
85
382
4ए
00
19
50
382
5
00
00
40
383
1बी
00
08
65
383
1ए
00
08
65
384
2बी
00
09
25
384
2ए
00
02
50
384
3
00
18
35
384
4
00
07
95
385
3बी
00
11
15
385
2
00
00
40
385
4
00
02
50
385
5
00
13
05
385
6
00
00
65
386
6
00
08
45
386
5बी
00
00
40
386
5सी
00
06
50
386
5डी
00
00
60
386
4बी
00
06
15
387
3बी
00
15
50
387
3ए
00
02
00
3824
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
387
2बी
00
01
00
387
2ए
00
18
10
387
1
00
15
50
388
1ए
00
11
90
388
2ए
00
12
60
389
1
00
12
25
389
2
00
11
90
356
2
00
03
20
356
1
00
10
30
356
4ए
00
11
70
356
4सी
00
05
25
355
4
00
22
75
355
3डी
00
01
90
355
3ई
00
04
90
352
5
00
05
80
352
4बी
00
13
45
352
4ए
00
04
50
352
3
00
07
60
352
2बी
00
04
15
352
2ए
00
04
00
351
5
00
08
30
351
4सी
00
15
30
351
3एच
00
03
00
351
3आई
00
01
10
351
3जे
00
00
40
351
2ई
00
03
40
351
2डी
00
01
65
351
2सी
00
00
40
350
10
00
21
60
कडलाड़ी
21 पुनवासल
236
2ए
00
19
30
237
1
00
05
85
237
3बी
00
02
90
237
3ए
00
09
75
378
3
00
09
00
378
4ए
00
02
10
234
4बी1
00
00
60
234
4बी2
00
01
35
377
1डी
00
03
20
377
1ई
00
03
60
377
3ए3
00
09
50
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3825
375
1
00
02
55
374
1ए
00
07
30
374
3एफ
00
09
20
374
2ए
00
04
50
374
2बी
00
03
90
374
3आई
00
04
75
374
3जे
00
01
00
374
4सी
00
03
70
374
5ए
00
03
70
374
5बी
00
04
60
372
1
00
01
85
372
2
00
00
90
372
3
00
05
00
371
1ए
00
05
15
371
2ए
00
05
00
371
2बी2
00
02
30
371
3ए
00
06
55
371
3बी
00
06
15
370
1बी
00
07
20
370
2ए
00
03
10
370
2बी
00
01
45
368
1
00
07
40
368
3
00
08
85
367
1बी1
00
11
40
367
2
00
03
70
366
1
00
00
40
366
2
00
01
50
366
3
00
02
80
366
4
00
04
20
366
5ए
00
04
20
366
6ए
00
02
40
366
5सी
00
06
20
366
5डी
00
07
45
421
1ए
00
22
60
421
1डी1
00
03
65
421
1बी2
00
20
45
424
4
00
03
65
425
1
00
04
75
425
2
00
03
30
427
1
00
01
60
3826
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
427
2
00
01
60
427
3ए
00
02
15
427
3बी
00
03
90
427
4ए
00
03
70
427
4बी
00
03
90
426
1ए
00
02
35
428
1
00
06
30
428
2
00
06
30
428
3
00
09
15
428
5
00
12
55
430
2ए
00
02
85
431
2
00
04
20
433
1ए
00
01
60
433
1बी
00
02
40
433
1सी
00
02
75
433
2
00
04
80
433
3
00
00
75
433
4ए
00
02
75
433
4बी1
00
01
75
433
4बी2
00
01
75
438
1ए1
00
06
60
438
1बी1
00
01
60
438
1बी2
00
04
60
438
2बी
00
06
75
438
3ए
00
11
90
439
1ए
00
33
60
कडलाड़ी
18 के वे]पनकुलम
70
3
00
04
50
70
6
00
23
60
70
4
00
00
40
70
2
00
08
90
70
1
00
07
00
73
6ई
00
00
40
73
6एफ
00
01
50
73
6जी
00
03
80
73
1एच
00
00
40
74
3
00
00
80
74
2
00
04
00
74
4
00
25
00
77
3ए1
00
06
55
77
3ए2
00
09
10
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3827
77
2सी
00
00
40
77
2बी
00
02
00
77
2ए
00
11
20
131
4ए
00
06
35
134
2डी
00
00
40
134
2एफ
00
08
10
134
3
00
03
00
135
5
00
15
60
135
3ए
00
03
55
135
7बी
00
05
95
136
2ए
00
01
25
136
2बी
00
06
30
136
7सी
00
05
35
136
3बी
00
11
20
136
6
00
03
20
144
3
00
04
30
144
7ए
00
07
15
144
4बी
00
03
50
144
4ए
00
06
80
155
3बी
00
06
35
155
3सी
00
02
55
155
4ए
00
01
50
155
4बी
00
00
40
158
1ए4
00
04
30
158
2
00
01
30
158
3
00
06
35
158
6ए
00
03
70
158
7ए1
00
05
80
158
1ए6
00
02
00
158
6बी
00
03
00
158
4बी
00
02
10
158
1ए5
00
01
00
160
1बी
00
03
75
160
33
00
06
15
160
1डी
00
06
55
160
1ए
00
00
95
160
1सी
00
05
10
161
2ए2
00
08
00
164
1
00
03
60
164
2ए1
00
24
40
3828
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
164
4
00
00
65
165
3एच
00
07
00
179
3
00
04
00
179
2
00
05
85
179
4बी1
00
03
90
180
4ए1
00
04
60
180
4ए2
00
06
10
181
7बी
00
05
65
186
2
00
13
70
186
3
00
01
65
186
4
00
10
90
190
1
00
09
35
190
2
00
11
10
191
6ए2
00
04
30
191
7ए
00
00
40
191
5बी
00
01
50
191
6ए1
00
05
90
200
4
00
00
40
200
6
00
00
40
200
5
00
03
50
200
7ए
00
00
95
200
8
00
12
10
कडलाड़ी
19 आ]पनूर
319
1ए
00
16
20
319
1बी
00
10
35
319
2
00
05
20
339
1
00
08
60
340
1
00
01
65
340
2
00
24
45
340
4
00
09
00
344
3
00
22
00
344
2
00
06
40
351
3सी
00
09
90
351
1ए
00
11
00
350
2बी
00
20
00
350
2ए
00
00
40
350
3
00
27
75
358
1ए
00
08
70
348
5बी
00
04
00
348
5ए
00
04
00
348
4बी
00
06
75
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3829
348
4ए
00
07
00
348
3बी
00
00
65
359
3बी
00
05
25
359
3ए
00
05
30
कडलाड़ी
17 मरवर क*रसलकुलम
297
2
00
33
50
295
2बी
00
13
00
295
2ए
00
07
10
294
2
00
07
60
301
1
00
01
30
293
2
00
28
75
303
2
00
06
80
303
3बी
00
13
00
303
4
00
16
65
311
1बी
00
00
40
311
1ए
00
07
40
304
2
00
15
15
304
1बी2
00
06
00
304
1बी1
00
07
00
304
1ए4
00
00
40
308
1
00
11
55
308
2
00
11
15
284
3
00
05
10
283
1ए1
00
04
70
283
1ए2
00
04
35
283
1ए3
00
05
05
283
1ए4
00
04
00
283
1ए5
00
01
50
283
1ए6
00
00
40
282
2बी
00
04
85
282
1बी
00
09
55
282
1ए
00
03
00
277
1ए
00
00
90
281
2सी
00
00
65
280
3
00
11
00
280
2
00
09
75
280
1ए2
00
00
40
280
1ए3
00
08
10
280
1बी
00
03
60
176
2
00
10
80
3830
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
175
14बी
00
01
65
175
14ए
00
00
40
175
14सी
00
06
60
175
13
00
07
40
180
5बी
00
09
60
177
3बी
00
04
85
177
3ए
00
07
75
177
1ए
00
00
50
177
1बी
00
10
70
178
10ए
00
08
30
178
9बी
00
00
40
178
8
00
08
25
178
2
00
00
95
178
3
00
07
70
178
1
00
07
20
199
2
00
10
65
200
3
00
18
90
200
2
00
13
90
200
1बी
00
06
00
200
1ए2
00
06
85
201
3
00
09
30
201
2
00
09
35
201
1
00
13
15
138
1
00
06
85
139
2सी
00
00
40
139
3ए
00
11
65
139
3बी
00
25
55
132
3ए
00
01
75
132
1ए
00
02
80
131
16
00
02
40
131
14बी
00
03
40
131
14ए
00
03
80
131
13
00
07
20
131
12ए
00
03
40
131
12बी
00
05
50
131
1बी
00
01
50
131
1ए
00
00
40
131
2बी
00
09
35
131
2ए
00
01
00
131
3
00
00
75
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3831
140
2सी
00
04
70
126
2सी
00
03
10
126
2डी
00
01
05
126
2बी1
00
02
35
126
2ए
00
02
20
126
3बी
00
04
05
126
3ए
00
02
70
126
4ए
00
12
00
126
4बी1
00
00
60
126
1
00
00
40
125
1एच
00
33
50
124
4बी2
00
00
50
124
5सी
00
02
75
124
5बी
00
02
75
124
5ए
00
03
00
124
2बी
00
04
95
124
6ए
00
03
75
124
1
00
03
15
109
17ए
00
00
75
109
19
00
01
20
109
17बी1
00
05
80
109
9बी
00
02
25
109
9सी
00
02
25
109
5सी
00
03
15
109
10
00
01
25
109
11
00
01
95
109
5बी
00
06
15
109
1बी
00
03
70
109
3
00
01
00
109
2
00
03
80
108
2सी2
00
03
00
108
2बी
00
02
15
108
2ए5
00
00
75
106
17ए2
00
00
40
106
17ए1
00
00
40
106
17बी
00
09
70
106
2
00
04
65
106
1सी
00
01
70
106
1डी
00
04
40
106
1बी
00
04
40
3832
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
106
5
00
00
65
103
4बी
00
06
50
103
7
00
03
40
103
5बी
00
04
00
103
5सी
00
05
85
100
2
00
07
00
100
3बी
00
00
40
100
3ए
00
02
85
100
1बी
00
02
60
100
5ए1
00
06
15
100
5ए2
00
02
85
99
3
00
11
75
99
5
00
00
50
99
4डी
00
00
75
99
4ई
00
06
30
99
4ए
00
01
60
87
4
00
06
30
87
2सी
00
12
25
87
2ए
00
07
20
87
1
00
12
80
87
3ए
00
03
80
कडलाड़ी
15 एस वागैकुलम
6
1ए
00
31
80
6
2ए/2
00
00
65
6
2ए1
00
04
90
6
2सी
00
03
00
6
2डी
00
00
40
7
3बी
00
00
40
7
3सी
00
02
30
7
3डी
00
07
15
7
3ई
00
02
85
7
3जी
00
04
95
7
2ई
00
04
25
7
2ए
00
04
50
7
1एफ
00
04
45
7
1बी
00
00
40
7
1सी
00
03
55
7
1डी
00
00
95
5
2बी
00
05
10
5
2ए
00
03
85
5
3डी
00
00
40
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3833
4
3
00
17
40
3
7
00
24
55
3
2
00
20
50
3
1ए1बी
00
05
50
19
00
20
40
कडलाड़ी
3 अवाडै
81
2
00
31
50
88
00
00
45
90
3
00
01
20
90
5
00
07
00
91
2
00
18
50
91
1
00
18
75
92
2
00
03
45
92
1
00
16
60
95
2
00
02
00
95
1
00
07
25
96
3
00
11
55
96
1
00
25
65
97
16
00
00
40
183
10ए
00
10
00
183
10बी
00
05
10
183
3
00
04
25
183
7
00
00
40
186
8
00
05
10
186
6
00
01
40
186
1बी
00
06
50
186
7
00
00
60
186
10
00
04
50
187
5
00
00
40
187
6
00
04
50
187
3
00
04
75
187
7
00
02
10
190
1
00
06
50
191
12
00
02
00
191
9
00
03
00
191
10
00
08
70
191
8
00
00
40
191
13/बी
00
17
45
207
4
00
02
65
207
1
00
03
45
208
4
00
01
35
3834
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
208
7
00
04
70
208
5
00
03
60
208
6
00
03
60
209
7
00
08
25
209
6
00
00
70
209
8
00
13
70
211
3
00
05
60
211
4
00
00
60
211
2
00
04
50
213
7
00
08
25
213
5
00
05
35
213
9
00
00
70
213
4
00
05
50
213
8
00
02
60
213
6
00
08
80
213
3सी
00
02
00
213
3डी
00
06
80
279
1
00
11
60
280
4
00
07
25
280
1
00
07
45
280
3
00
06
40
280
2
00
13
40
281
6
00
00
40
281
5बी2
00
00
55
282
1ए
00
19
40
282
1सी1
00
09
50
282
1बी
00
09
75
283
1
00
38
00
285
7
00
06
40
305
2
00
13
30
306
8
00
10
00
306
7
00
00
40
306
3
00
07
55
306
9
00
01
60
306
5
00
06
00
306
4
00
01
75
306
6
00
10
80
306
2
00
00
90
307
1
00
16
00
307
2
00
09
65
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3835
312
4बी
00
00
40
312
4ए
00
02
65
312
3
00
08
10
316
6बी
00
12
40
316
5
00
02
60
338
1
00
27
50
338
2ए
00
00
60
339
3
00
05
00
339
2
00
16
00
339
6
00
06
30
339
5
00
07
40
339
1बी
00
00
40
339
7ए
00
07
75
344
1
00
12
80
344
2
00
09
50
344
3
00
00
40
345
2
00
00
40
345
9
00
06
00
346
3
00
14
70
346
2
00
15
50
347
2
00
09
25
347
4ए
00
00
60
347
3बी
00
03
70
347
3ए
00
14
40
347
1
00
06
50
348
1
00
22
50
349
00
00
40
कडलाड़ी
4 ए नेडुंकुलम
45
8
00
00
40
45
9
00
04
00
45
10
00
03
50
45
11
00
07
20
45
14
00
07
30
45
6ए
00
03
15
45
6बी
00
06
00
45
7ए
00
03
65
45
7बी
00
00
70
46
9
00
01
65
46
8ए
00
03
50
46
8बी
00
01
70
50
7
00
07
90
3836
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
50
8
00
07
65
50
6ए
00
02
30
50
6बी
00
04
65
50
9ए
00
05
50
50
9बी
00
04
90
57
1
00
10
60
57
4
00
08
00
57
5
00
00
40
59
5
00
11
30
59
6ए
00
09
00
59
6बी
00
08
10
61
1
00
21
25
61
2
00
07
70
61
3
00
01
60
63
2
00
11
75
63
1ए
00
00
60
63
1बी
00
13
00
63
3बी
00
00
40
108
3
00
04
75
108
1ए
00
07
90
108
2ए
00
02
75
109
2
00
08
80
109
1ए
00
07
30
109
1बी
00
00
40
109
4ए
00
09
50
110
1बी
00
08
20
110
2बी
00
09
75
110
3बी
00
01
25
113
2ए
00
03
75
113
2बी
00
00
40
113
3डी
00
00
70
113
3ई
00
06
40
113
3एफ
00
01
10
114
3
00
03
10
114
4
00
04
10
114
6
00
03
00
114
11
00
01
20
114
1बी
00
04
85
114
1सी
00
06
80
114
7ए1
00
01
90
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3837
114
7ए2
00
06
80
115
1ए
00
01
00
115
1बी
00
01
00
116
5
00
04
00
116
6ए
00
01
00
116
6बी
00
04
40
116
8
00
08
40
116
9
00
11
10
116
11
00
01
15
116
4ए
00
03
70
116
4बी
00
04
70
120
15
00
08
90
130
11
00
23
50
132
7
00
04
90
132
2बी
00
04
60
132
8बी2
00
03
70
134
6बी
00
00
60
134
6डी
00
01
85
134
6ई
00
04
20
134
6एच
00
09
95
135
4
00
03
85
135
5
00
02
20
135
6
00
04
65
135
7
00
04
05
135
8
00
04
60
172
16
00
00
40
172
17
00
03
20
172
21
00
06
50
172
22
00
04
95
172
1सी
00
04
40
172
1डी
00
01
00
173
6
00
09
75
173
3ई
00
00
40
173
4बी
00
03
50
173
5बी1
00
00
45
173
5बी2
00
03
75
173
5सी
00
00
55
174
15
00
24
45
174
14सी
00
00
40
175
10
00
01
25
3838
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
211
2
00
03
65
211
3बी
00
04
55
211
3सी
00
06
60
211
3डी
00
06
70
211
4ए
00
00
80
211
5ए
00
03
10
211
6ए
00
05
40
212
3
00
07
55
212
1सी
00
04
05
212
6बी1
00
02
20
212
6बी2
00
07
90
213
10
00
03
20
213
6ए
00
00
55
213
6बी
00
03
25
213
7ए
00
07
00
213
7बी
00
01
30
213
8ए
00
03
60
213
9ए
00
04
20
226
2
00
00
40
226
4
00
10
90
226
8
00
04
60
226
7ए
00
07
60
226
7बी
00
00
40
226
9बी1
00
02
70
226
9बी2
00
02
60
230
2
00
18
65
230
1ए4
00
10
00
230
1बी1
00
30
20
230
1बी2
00
08
00
231
2
00
11
30
231
3
00
05
40
231
1बी
00
00
40
231
1सी
00
04
90
231
1डी
00
05
80
231
1ई
00
03
40
234
00
01
25
कडलाड़ी
66 कोरसन कोै
464
3
00
04
35
453
1
00
00
80
457
1बी
00
03
45
457
1ए1
00
05
90
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3839
457
1ए2
00
06
25
457
2
00
29
40
452
2
00
14
75
450
2
00
00
40
450
1
00
20
90
449
5
00
05
60
449
7बी
00
00
40
449
4
00
05
55
449
7ए
00
04
70
449
3
00
13
70
449
2बी
00
00
40
447
7सी
00
00
40
448
2
00
07
95
448
1
00
05
80
448
4ए
00
03
75
448
4बी
00
04
75
448
4सी
00
04
55
448
4डी
00
05
50
433
8ए
00
08
85
433
8बी
00
00
85
433
7
00
09
15
433
2
00
09
10
433
1
00
00
45
430
1
00
03
70
430
3
00
25
60
कडलाड़ी
7 कडुनलानपी
105
7ए
00
00
40
105
6
00
04
90
106
5बी1
00
00
40
106
5बी2
00
07
40
106
4
00
08
65
106
3
00
06
50
118
2ए
00
18
90
118
2बी
00
03
50
118
4ए
00
08
70
118
5ए
00
02
90
118
1
00
03
55
118
3
00
01
10
124
3बी
00
13
50
127
4
00
01
10
127
1
00
00
45
3840
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
127
2
00
25
90
127
3
00
08
30
132
2
00
07
20
132
1यू
00
06
00
134
1ए
00
23
65
137
5
00
29
60
140
2सी
00
16
20
140
2डी
00
05
30
140
2बी
00
02
30
140
3
00
07
70
212
5
00
06
65
212
4ए
00
00
65
212
6
00
05
90
212
4बी
00
05
00
212
3
00
06
00
212
1बी
00
09
70
212
1ए
00
02
90
212
2
00
02
10
214
3
00
12
60
214
1बी
00
09
45
214
4बी
00
00
40
214
2
00
10
80
214
4ए
00
09
10
219
6बी
00
01
10
220
1
00
25
10
220
2
00
11
70
220
4
00
02
30
220
3
00
12
80
221
1
00
01
65
221
3बी
00
06
70
221
3ए
00
07
10
229
1
00
11
60
230
2बी
00
13
70
230
2ए
00
12
00
231
3बी
00
06
25
231
2
00
01
30
231
3ए
00
11
60
232
1डी
00
00
40
232
3बी
00
20
70
232
1बी
00
14
50
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3841
232
1सी
00
08
80
233
2
00
11
00
324
4
00
00
70
326
3ए2
00
09
00
326
3ए1
00
06
50
326
3ए4
00
09
25
326
3ए3
00
08
85
326
3बी
00
22
05
332
2
00
11
00
333
3डी2
00
11
50
333
5बी
00
04
20
349
1ए1
00
15
70
350
1ए
00
16
85
350
1बी
00
00
40
350
1सी
00
09
80
350
2ए
00
02
10
351
2बी3
00
10
10
353
1
00
41
00
मुदुकुलूर
8 मेल िसरपोतु
266
2ए
00
05
25
266
2बी
00
04
90
266
3ए
00
04
85
266
3बी
00
05
15
267
2ए
00
11
75
269
1ए
00
07
55
269
1बी
00
07
55
269
2ए
00
04
15
269
2बी
00
04
35
269
3ए
00
08
30
270
1बी
00
03
90
270
2ए
00
03
85
270
3सी
00
00
50
271
1ए
00
08
95
289
1ए
00
04
45
289
1बी
00
04
45
289
1सी
00
04
45
289
1डी
00
05
10
289
3ए
00
02
50
289
3बी
00
06
85
291
1ए
00
03
45
290
7
00
19
35
3842
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
290
13ए
00
04
40
290
13बी
00
04
40
290
13सी
00
07
60
290
12बी
00
00
40
290
12सी
00
01
10
कुमुदी
47 एम पुदुकुलम
1
12
00
02
80
1
13
00
07
90
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/99/2017-ओआर-I/ई-8030]
पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018
S.O. 808.—Whereas, by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural
Gas number S.O. 563(E) dated: 15.02.2017 issued under sub section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals
Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (herein after referred to as the said Act) the
Central Government declared its intention to acquire the Right of User in the Lands specified in the Schedule appended
to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of Natural Gas, a pipeline “Ennore-
Tiruvallur -Bengaluru -Pondicherry -Nagapattinam –Madurai- Tuticorin” should be laid in the State of Tamil Nadu by
Indian Oil Corporation Limited.
And whereas, copies of the said notifications were made available to the public from 01.03.2017.
And whereas, the Competent Authority in pursuance of sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act has
submitted his report to the Central Government;
And whereas, the Central Government, after considering the said report is satisfied that the Right of User in
the Land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification should be acquired;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central
Government hereby declares that the Right of User in the said Land specified in the Schedule appended to this
notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central
Government hereby directs that the Right of User in the said Land shall instead of vesting in the Central Government,
vest from the date of publication of this declaration, in the Indian Oil Corporation Limited free from all encumbrances.
Indian Oil Corporation Limited shall be exclusively liable for any compensation in terms of section 10 of the P
& M P Act, 1962 and no suit, claim or legal proceeding would lie against the Central Government on any matter
relating to pipeline.
SCHEDULE
District : Ramanathapuram
State : Tamil Nadu
Name of the Taluk
Name of the Village
Survey No.
Sub
Division
No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Square
Meter
1
2
3
4
5
6
Kadaladi
40 Keerandai
251
18
00
03
70
251
19
00
03
00
251
17
00
10
30
251
9B
00
06
90
251
10
00
01
25
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3843
251
15A1
00
04
90
251
15A2
00
00
40
251
11
00
05
60
256
7A
00
02
70
256
5
00
06
95
256
10A
00
00
40
256
1
00
05
00
258
3D
00
04
35
258
3B
00
02
70
258
3A
00
01
00
258
2
00
03
45
258
1
00
02
90
259
9B
00
00
90
259
10
00
07
60
259
7
00
02
95
259
5
00
03
90
259
3A
00
06
30
259
3B
00
04
60
265
6
00
03
60
265
7
00
00
40
265
5B
00
06
80
265
5A
00
09
55
265
1
00
02
00
270
1
00
00
40
266
2
00
13
00
266
3A
00
00
40
266
4
00
01
60
266
5
00
05
50
266
6A
00
01
40
266
7
00
01
20
266
1B
00
02
45
266
1A
00
06
00
267
2C3
00
04
40
267
2C2
00
06
15
267
2C1
00
05
05
267
2A
00
00
65
267
4
00
00
40
267
5
00
01
90
150
6A
00
09
00
3844
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
173
8A
00
10
10
173
7A
00
10
80
173
3C
00
03
70
173
3D
00
03
00
173
3E
00
00
80
173
2B
00
03
50
173
3G
00
02
30
173
3H
00
02
90
173
3I
00
03
60
173
3J
00
03
45
173
3K
00
02
90
173
3L
00
03
40
172
5C4
00
02
70
172
5B
00
00
40
172
9
00
06
70
172
7
00
11
85
172
6A
00
02
25
172
6B
00
10
00
158
1
00
01
20
170
5B
00
06
50
159
2B
00
02
80
159
2A
00
04
35
159
1C
00
17
20
159
1B
00
01
35
166
10A1A
00
06
40
166
10A1B
00
10
00
166
10A1C
00
00
90
166
7
00
08
30
166
8A
00
09
70
104
1
00
00
60
104
2
00
13
65
104
3
00
01
25
78
7
00
10
45
103
3B
00
12
25
103
3C
00
03
10
103
2B
00
06
80
105
1
00
01
45
102
1B2
00
08
00
102
2
00
12
00
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3845
102
3
00
13
00
101
10
00
01
55
106
1D
00
00
50
106
1C
00
03
60
106
1B
00
04
35
106
1A
00
03
10
110
1A
00
11
15
98
2B
00
02
00
98
1E
00
03
30
98
1F1
00
09
80
98
1F2
00
02
55
98
1F3
00
01
35
113
7B
00
00
80
113
7A
00
01
40
113
4
00
04
20
113
3C
00
00
40
113
5
00
05
70
113
2
00
00
60
113
6
00
04
45
113
1C2
00
07
35
113
1C1
00
04
85
113
1B
00
00
70
116
1
00
13
00
115
3
00
10
45
127
00
04
60
430
13
00
04
15
430
14
00
09
30
430
7
00
03
35
430
6
00
03
85
430
5
00
06
10
430
4
00
00
40
433
1
00
00
40
432
14
00
06
90
432
13
00
03
40
432
11
00
06
50
432
9
00
07
10
432
10
00
00
45
432
8
00
00
60
432
6
00
00
40
3846
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
436
00
04
50
425
1
00
26
10
19
7
00
11
70
2
8
00
06
95
2
9
00
00
40
2
10
00
13
15
2
7
00
25
90
Kadaladi
23 Orivayal
252
00
32
60
253
1
00
06
80
248
2
00
20
50
248
1
00
14
00
249
1
00
16
75
158
2
00
00
40
158
1
00
13
25
154
1C
00
01
30
154
1B
00
04
45
154
1A
00
09
75
153
3
00
20
90
153
1
00
00
50
153
2
00
27
00
151
4
00
09
20
151
3
00
09
55
150
5
00
14
95
150
2
00
11
60
149
4
00
16
70
149
1
00
04
50
148
00
07
20
147
2
00
06
70
147
1
00
07
00
146
2
00
07
60
146
1
00
06
90
145
2
00
13
70
24
3
00
05
45
24
24
00
01
00
24
2C4
00
03
70
24
23
00
00
40
24
2C3
00
06
40
24
2C2
00
06
75
24
2B3
00
02
40
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3847
24
2B2
00
04
15
24
2B1
00
04
85
24
19
00
08
80
24
18
00
04
60
24
17
00
07
20
24
2A2
00
05
20
24
2A1
00
09
00
23
2
00
10
90
22
3E
00
05
40
22
3F
00
03
20
21
2B2
00
00
45
21
2B1
00
02
25
21
2A2
00
03
00
21
2A3
00
04
20
21
2A1
00
06
85
21
3A
00
00
65
21
1A
00
05
75
Kadaladi
22 Marandai
380
00
07
55
382
3B
00
03
70
382
4B
00
12
85
382
4A
00
19
50
382
5
00
00
40
383
1B
00
08
65
383
1A
00
08
65
384
2B
00
09
25
384
2A
00
02
50
384
3
00
18
35
384
4
00
07
95
385
3B
00
11
15
385
2
00
00
40
385
4
00
02
50
385
5
00
13
05
385
6
00
00
65
386
6
00
08
45
386
5B
00
00
40
386
5C
00
06
50
386
5D
00
00
60
386
4B
00
06
15
387
3B
00
15
50
3848
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
387
3A
00
02
00
387
2B
00
01
00
387
2A
00
18
10
387
1
00
15
50
388
1A
00
11
90
388
2A
00
12
60
389
1
00
12
25
389
2
00
11
90
356
2
00
03
20
356
1
00
10
30
356
4A
00
11
70
356
4C
00
05
25
355
4
00
22
75
355
3D
00
01
90
355
3E
00
04
90
352
5
00
05
80
352
4B
00
13
45
352
4A
00
04
50
352
3
00
07
60
352
2B
00
04
15
352
2A
00
04
00
351
5
00
08
30
351
4C
00
15
30
351
3H
00
03
00
351
3I
00
01
10
351
3J
00
00
40
351
2E
00
03
40
351
2D
00
01
65
351
2C
00
00
40
350
10
00
21
60
Kadaladi
21 Punavasal
236
2A
00
19
30
237
1
00
05
85
237
3B
00
02
90
237
3A
00
09
75
378
3
00
09
00
378
4A
00
02
10
234
4B1
00
00
60
234
4B2
00
01
35
377
1D
00
03
20
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3849
377
1E
00
03
60
377
3A3
00
09
50
375
1
00
02
55
374
1A
00
07
30
374
3F
00
09
20
374
2A
00
04
50
374
2B
00
03
90
374
3I
00
04
75
374
3J
00
01
00
374
4C
00
03
70
374
5A
00
03
70
374
5B
00
04
60
372
1
00
01
85
372
2
00
00
90
372
3
00
05
00
371
1A
00
05
15
371
2A
00
05
00
371
2B2
00
02
30
371
3A
00
06
55
371
3B
00
06
15
370
1B
00
07
20
370
2A
00
03
10
370
2B
00
01
45
368
1
00
07
40
368
3
00
08
85
367
1B1
00
11
40
367
2
00
03
70
366
1
00
00
40
366
2
00
01
50
366
3
00
02
80
366
4
00
04
20
366
5A
00
04
20
366
6A
00
02
40
366
5C
00
06
20
366
5D
00
07
45
421
1A
00
22
60
421
1D1
00
03
65
421
1B2
00
20
45
424
4
00
03
65
3850
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
425
1
00
04
75
425
2
00
03
30
427
1
00
01
60
427
2
00
01
60
427
3A
00
02
15
427
3B
00
03
90
427
4A
00
03
70
427
4B
00
03
90
426
1A
00
02
35
428
1
00
06
30
428
2
00
06
30
428
3
00
09
15
428
5
00
12
55
430
2A
00
02
85
431
2
00
04
20
433
1A
00
01
60
433
1B
00
02
40
433
1C
00
02
75
433
2
00
04
80
433
3
00
00
75
433
4A
00
02
75
433
4B1
00
01
75
433
4B2
00
01
75
438
1A1
00
06
60
438
1B1
00
01
60
438
1B2
00
04
60
438
2B
00
06
75
438
3A
00
11
90
439
1A
00
33
60
Kadaladi
18 K Veppangulam
70
3
00
04
50
70
6
00
23
60
70
4
00
00
40
70
2
00
08
90
70
1
00
07
00
73
6E
00
00
40
73
6F
00
01
50
73
6G
00
03
80
73
1H
00
00
40
74
3
00
00
80
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3851
74
2
00
04
00
74
4
00
25
00
77
3A1
00
06
55
77
3A2
00
09
10
77
2C
00
00
40
77
2B
00
02
00
77
2A
00
11
20
131
4A
00
06
35
134
2D
00
00
40
134
2F
00
08
10
134
3
00
03
00
135
5
00
15
60
135
3A
00
03
55
135
7B
00
05
95
136
2A
00
01
25
136
2B
00
06
30
136
7C
00
05
35
136
3B
00
11
20
136
6
00
03
20
144
3
00
04
30
144
7A
00
07
15
144
4B
00
03
50
144
4A
00
06
80
155
3B
00
06
35
155
3C
00
02
55
155
4A
00
01
50
155
4B
00
00
40
158
1A4
00
04
30
158
2
00
01
30
158
3
00
06
35
158
6A
00
03
70
158
7A1
00
05
80
158
1A6
00
02
00
158
6B
00
03
00
158
4B
00
02
10
158
1A5
00
01
00
160
1B
00
03
75
160
33
00
06
15
160
1D
00
06
55
3852
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
160
1A
00
00
95
160
1C
00
05
10
161
2A2
00
08
00
164
1
00
03
60
164
2A1
00
24
40
164
4
00
00
65
165
3H
00
07
00
179
3
00
04
00
179
2
00
05
85
179
4B1
00
03
90
180
4A1
00
04
60
180
4A2
00
06
10
181
7B
00
05
65
186
2
00
13
70
186
3
00
01
65
186
4
00
10
90
190
1
00
09
35
190
2
00
11
10
191
6A2
00
04
30
191
7A
00
00
40
191
5B
00
01
50
191
6A1
00
05
90
200
4
00
00
40
200
6
00
00
40
200
5
00
03
50
200
7A
00
00
95
200
8
00
12
10
Kadaladi
19 Appanur
319
1A
00
16
20
319
1B
00
10
35
319
2
00
05
20
339
1
00
08
60
340
1
00
01
65
340
2
00
24
45
340
4
00
09
00
344
3
00
22
00
344
2
00
06
40
351
3C
00
09
90
351
1A
00
11
00
350
2B
00
20
00
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3853
350
2A
00
00
40
350
3
00
27
75
358
1A
00
08
70
348
5B
00
04
00
348
5A
00
04
00
348
4B
00
06
75
348
4A
00
07
00
348
3B
00
00
65
359
3B
00
05
25
359
3A
00
05
30
Kadaladi
17 Maravar Karisalkulam
297
2
00
33
50
295
2B
00
13
00
295
2A
00
07
10
294
2
00
07
60
301
1
00
01
30
293
2
00
28
75
303
2
00
06
80
303
3B
00
13
00
303
4
00
16
65
311
1B
00
00
40
311
1A
00
07
40
304
2
00
15
15
304
1B2
00
06
00
304
1B1
00
07
00
304
1A4
00
00
40
308
1
00
11
55
308
2
00
11
15
284
3
00
05
10
283
1A1
00
04
70
283
1A2
00
04
35
283
1A3
00
05
05
283
1A4
00
04
00
283
1A5
00
01
50
283
1A6
00
00
40
282
2B
00
04
85
282
1B
00
09
55
282
1A
00
03
00
277
1A
00
00
90
3854
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
281
2C
00
00
65
280
3
00
11
00
280
2
00
09
75
280
1A2
00
00
40
280
1A3
00
08
10
280
1B
00
03
60
176
2
00
10
80
175
14B
00
01
65
175
14A
00
00
40
175
14C
00
06
60
175
13
00
07
40
180
5B
00
09
60
177
3B
00
04
85
177
3A
00
07
75
177
1A
00
00
50
177
1B
00
10
70
178
10A
00
08
30
178
9B
00
00
40
178
8
00
08
25
178
2
00
00
95
178
3
00
07
70
178
1
00
07
20
199
2
00
10
65
200
3
00
18
90
200
2
00
13
90
200
1B
00
06
00
200
1A2
00
06
85
201
3
00
09
30
201
2
00
09
35
201
1
00
13
15
138
1
00
06
85
139
2C
00
00
40
139
3A
00
11
65
139
3B
00
25
55
132
3A
00
01
75
132
1A
00
02
80
131
16
00
02
40
131
14B
00
03
40
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3855
131
14A
00
03
80
131
13
00
07
20
131
12A
00
03
40
131
12B
00
05
50
131
1B
00
01
50
131
1A
00
00
40
131
2B
00
09
35
131
2A
00
01
00
131
3
00
00
75
140
2C
00
04
70
126
2C
00
03
10
126
2D
00
01
05
126
2B1
00
02
35
126
2A
00
02
20
126
3B
00
04
05
126
3A
00
02
70
126
4A
00
12
00
126
4B1
00
00
60
126
1
00
00
40
125
1H
00
33
50
124
4B2
00
00
50
124
5C
00
02
75
124
5B
00
02
75
124
5A
00
03
00
124
2B
00
04
95
124
6A
00
03
75
124
1
00
03
15
109
17A
00
00
75
109
19
00
01
20
109
17B1
00
05
80
109
9B
00
02
25
109
9C
00
02
25
109
5C
00
03
15
109
10
00
01
25
109
11
00
01
95
109
5B
00
06
15
109
1B
00
03
70
109
3
00
01
00
3856
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
109
2
00
03
80
108
2C2
00
03
00
108
2B
00
02
15
108
2A5
00
00
75
106
17A2
00
00
40
106
17A1
00
00
40
106
17B
00
09
70
106
2
00
04
65
106
1C
00
01
70
106
1D
00
04
40
106
1B
00
04
40
106
5
00
00
65
103
4B
00
06
50
103
7
00
03
40
103
5B
00
04
00
103
5C
00
05
85
100
2
00
07
00
100
3B
00
00
40
100
3A
00
02
85
100
1B
00
02
60
100
5A1
00
06
15
100
5A2
00
02
85
99
3
00
11
75
99
5
00
00
50
99
4D
00
00
75
99
4E
00
06
30
99
4A
00
01
60
87
4
00
06
30
87
2C
00
12
25
87
2A
00
07
20
87
1
00
12
80
87
3A
00
03
80
Kadaladi
15 S Vagaikkulam
6
1A
00
31
80
6
2A/2
00
00
65
6
2A1
00
04
90
6
2C
00
03
00
6
2D
00
00
40
7
3B
00
00
40
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3857
7
3C
00
02
30
7
3D
00
07
15
7
3E
00
02
85
7
3G
00
04
95
7
2E
00
04
25
7
2A
00
04
50
7
1F
00
04
45
7
1B
00
00
40
7
1C
00
03
55
7
1D
00
00
95
5
2B
00
05
10
5
2A
00
03
85
5
3D
00
00
40
4
3
00
17
40
3
7
00
24
55
3
2
00
20
50
3
1A1B
00
05
50
19
00
20
40
Kadaladi
3 Avathandai
81
2
00
31
50
88
00
00
45
90
3
00
01
20
90
5
00
07
00
91
2
00
18
50
91
1
00
18
75
92
2
00
03
45
92
1
00
16
60
95
2
00
02
00
95
1
00
07
25
96
3
00
11
55
96
1
00
25
65
97
16
00
00
40
183
10A
00
10
00
183
10B
00
05
10
183
3
00
04
25
183
7
00
00
40
186
8
00
05
10
186
6
00
01
40
186
1B
00
06
50
3858
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
186
7
00
00
60
186
10
00
04
50
187
5
00
00
40
187
6
00
04
50
187
3
00
04
75
187
7
00
02
10
190
1
00
06
50
191
12
00
02
00
191
9
00
03
00
191
10
00
08
70
191
8
00
00
40
191
13/B
00
17
45
207
4
00
02
65
207
1
00
03
45
208
4
00
01
35
208
7
00
04
70
208
5
00
03
60
208
6
00
03
60
209
7
00
08
25
209
6
00
00
70
209
8
00
13
70
211
3
00
05
60
211
4
00
00
60
211
2
00
04
50
213
7
00
08
25
213
5
00
05
35
213
9
00
00
70
213
4
00
05
50
213
8
00
02
60
213
6
00
08
80
213
3C
00
02
00
213
3D
00
06
80
279
1
00
11
60
280
4
00
07
25
280
1
00
07
45
280
3
00
06
40
280
2
00
13
40
281
6
00
00
40
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3859
281
5B2
00
00
55
282
1A
00
19
40
282
1C1
00
09
50
282
1B
00
09
75
283
1
00
38
00
285
7
00
06
40
305
2
00
13
30
306
8
00
10
00
306
7
00
00
40
306
3
00
07
55
306
9
00
01
60
306
5
00
06
00
306
4
00
01
75
306
6
00
10
80
306
2
00
00
90
307
1
00
16
00
307
2
00
09
65
312
4B
00
00
40
312
4A
00
02
65
312
3
00
08
10
316
6B
00
12
40
316
5
00
02
60
338
1
00
27
50
338
2A
00
00
60
339
3
00
05
00
339
2
00
16
00
339
6
00
06
30
339
5
00
07
40
339
1B
00
00
40
339
7A
00
07
75
344
1
00
12
80
344
2
00
09
50
344
3
00
00
40
345
2
00
00
40
345
9
00
06
00
346
3
00
14
70
346
2
00
15
50
347
2
00
09
25
3860
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
347
4A
00
00
60
347
3B
00
03
70
347
3A
00
14
40
347
1
00
06
50
348
1
00
22
50
349
00
00
40
Kadaladi
4 A Nedunkulam
45
8
00
00
40
45
9
00
04
00
45
10
00
03
50
45
11
00
07
20
45
14
00
07
30
45
6A
00
03
15
45
6B
00
06
00
45
7A
00
03
65
45
7B
00
00
70
46
9
00
01
65
46
8A
00
03
50
46
8B
00
01
70
50
7
00
07
90
50
8
00
07
65
50
6A
00
02
30
50
6B
00
04
65
50
9A
00
05
50
50
9B
00
04
90
57
1
00
10
60
57
4
00
08
00
57
5
00
00
40
59
5
00
11
30
59
6A
00
09
00
59
6B
00
08
10
61
1
00
21
25
61
2
00
07
70
61
3
00
01
60
63
2
00
11
75
63
1A
00
00
60
63
1B
00
13
00
63
3B
00
00
40
108
3
00
04
75
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3861
108
1A
00
07
90
108
2A
00
02
75
109
2
00
08
80
109
1A
00
07
30
109
1B
00
00
40
109
4A
00
09
50
110
1B
00
08
20
110
2B
00
09
75
110
3B
00
01
25
113
2A
00
03
75
113
2B
00
00
40
113
3D
00
00
70
113
3E
00
06
40
113
3F
00
01
10
114
3
00
03
10
114
4
00
04
10
114
6
00
03
00
114
11
00
01
20
114
1B
00
04
85
114
1C
00
06
80
114
7A1
00
01
90
114
7A2
00
06
80
115
1A
00
01
00
115
1B
00
01
00
116
5
00
04
00
116
6A
00
01
00
116
6B
00
04
40
116
8
00
08
40
116
9
00
11
10
116
11
00
01
15
116
4A
00
03
70
116
4B
00
04
70
120
15
00
08
90
130
11
00
23
50
132
7
00
04
90
132
2B
00
04
60
132
8B2
00
03
70
134
6B
00
00
60
3862
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
134
6D
00
01
85
134
6E
00
04
20
134
6H
00
09
95
135
4
00
03
85
135
5
00
02
20
135
6
00
04
65
135
7
00
04
05
135
8
00
04
60
172
16
00
00
40
172
17
00
03
20
172
21
00
06
50
172
22
00
04
95
172
1C
00
04
40
172
1D
00
01
00
173
6
00
09
75
173
3E
00
00
40
173
4B
00
03
50
173
5B1
00
00
45
173
5B2
00
03
75
173
5C
00
00
55
174
15
00
24
45
174
14C
00
00
40
175
10
00
01
25
211
2
00
03
65
211
3B
00
04
55
211
3C
00
06
60
211
3D
00
06
70
211
4A
00
00
80
211
5A
00
03
10
211
6A
00
05
40
212
3
00
07
55
212
1C
00
04
05
212
6B1
00
02
20
212
6B2
00
07
90
213
10
00
03
20
213
6A
00
00
55
213
6B
00
03
25
213
7A
00
07
00
213
7B
00
01
30
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3863
213
8A
00
03
60
213
9A
00
04
20
226
2
00
00
40
226
4
00
10
90
226
8
00
04
60
226
7A
00
07
60
226
7B
00
00
40
226
9B1
00
02
70
226
9B2
00
02
60
230
2
00
18
65
230
1A4
00
10
00
230
1B1
00
30
20
230
1B2
00
08
00
231
2
00
11
30
231
3
00
05
40
231
1B
00
00
40
231
1C
00
04
90
231
1D
00
05
80
231
1E
00
03
40
234
00
01
25
Kadaladi
66 Kokkarasan Kottai
464
3
00
04
35
453
1
00
00
80
457
1B
00
03
45
457
1A1
00
05
90
457
1A2
00
06
25
457
2
00
29
40
452
2
00
14
75
450
2
00
00
40
450
1
00
20
90
449
5
00
05
60
449
7B
00
00
40
449
4
00
05
55
449
7A
00
04
70
449
3
00
13
70
449
2B
00
00
40
447
7C
00
00
40
448
2
00
07
95
448
1
00
05
80
448
4A
00
03
75
3864
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
448
4B
00
04
75
448
4C
00
04
55
448
4D
00
05
50
433
8A
00
08
85
433
8B
00
00
85
433
7
00
09
15
433
2
00
09
10
433
1
00
00
45
430
1
00
03
70
430
3
00
25
60
Kadaladi
7 Kondunallanpatti
105
7A
00
00
40
105
6
00
04
90
106
5B1
00
00
40
106
5B2
00
07
40
106
4
00
08
65
106
3
00
06
50
118
2A
00
18
90
118
2B
00
03
50
118
4A
00
08
70
118
5A
00
02
90
118
1
00
03
55
118
3
00
01
10
124
3B
00
13
50
127
4
00
01
10
127
1
00
00
45
127
2
00
25
90
127
3
00
08
30
132
2
00
07
20
132
1Q
00
06
00
134
1A
00
23
65
137
5
00
29
60
140
2C
00
16
20
140
2D
00
05
30
140
2B
00
02
30
140
3
00
07
70
212
5
00
06
65
212
4A
00
00
65
212
6
00
05
90
212
4B
00
05
00
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3865
212
3
00
06
00
212
1B
00
09
70
212
1A
00
02
90
212
2
00
02
10
214
3
00
12
60
214
1B
00
09
45
214
4B
00
00
40
214
2
00
10
80
214
4A
00
09
10
219
6B
00
01
10
220
1
00
25
10
220
2
00
11
70
220
4
00
02
30
220
3
00
12
80
221
1
00
01
65
221
3B
00
06
70
221
3A
00
07
10
229
1
00
11
60
230
2B
00
13
70
230
2A
00
12
00
231
3B
00
06
25
231
2
00
01
30
231
3A
00
11
60
232
1D
00
00
40
232
3B
00
20
70
232
1B
00
14
50
232
1C
00
08
80
233
2
00
11
00
324
4
00
00
70
326
3A2
00
09
00
326
3A1
00
06
50
326
3A4
00
09
25
326
3A3
00
08
85
326
3B
00
22
05
332
2
00
11
00
333
3D2
00
11
50
333
5B
00
04
20
349
1A1
00
15
70
350
1A
00
16
85
3866
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
350
1B
00
00
40
350
1C
00
09
80
350
2A
00
02
10
351
2B3
00
10
10
353
1
00
41
00
Mudukulathur
8 Mela Sirupothu
266
2A
00
05
25
266
2B
00
04
90
266
3A
00
04
85
266
3B
00
05
15
267
2A
00
11
75
269
1A
00
07
55
269
1B
00
07
55
269
2A
00
04
15
269
2B
00
04
35
269
3A
00
08
30
270
1B
00
03
90
270
2A
00
03
85
270
3C
00
00
50
271
1A
00
08
95
289
1A
00
04
45
289
1B
00
04
45
289
1C
00
04
45
289
1D
00
05
10
289
3A
00
02
50
289
3B
00
06
85
291
1A
00
03
45
290
7
00
19
35
290
13A
00
04
40
290
13B
00
04
40
290
13C
00
07
60
290
12B
00
00
40
290
12C
00
01
10
Kamuthi
47 M. Pudukulam
1
12
00
02
80
1
13
00
07
90
[F. No. R-11025(11)/99/2017-OR-I/E-8030]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3867
नई दली, 15 मई, 2018
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 809
809
809
809.—केीय सरकार, पेोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूिम म उपयोग के अिधकार का अज न) अिधिनयम
1962 (1962 का 50) क( धारा 6 क( उप-धारा (1) के )ारा *द+ शि-य. का *योग करते 0ए भारत सरकार के पैोिलयम और
*ाकृितक गैस मं4ालय क( अिधसूचना सं7या का. आ. 2383 तारीख 29.09.2017 म, जो भारत के राजप4, भाग II, ख;ड 3, उपख;ड
(ii), भारत का राजप4 सं. 41 म पृ> 7903 और 7906 म *कािशत क( गई थी, म िन@िलिखत संशोधन करती है, अथा त:-
पृ> 7903 (Bहदी अिधसूचना ) और 7906 (अंCेजी अिधसूचना) म, “44. सडयंकुEपम” गांव के संबंध म "तालुक-पोHेरी,
िजला-ितIवलुर, राKय-तिमलनाडु" क( जगह "तालुक- ितIवोLMयूर, िजला-ितIवलुर, राKय-तिमलनाडु" के Nप मे पढ़ा
जाए।
अिधसूचना का शेष िवषय अपLरवOतत रहगे ।
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/99/2017-ओआर-I/ई-8030]
पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018
S.O. 809.—In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub section (1) of Section 6 of the Petroleum and Minerals
Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 ( 50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby makes the
following amendments in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas
number S.O. 2383 dated the 29.09.2017, published in Part- II, Section 3, Sub section (ii) of the Gazette of India, No.41,
at page No.7903 and 7906 namely:-
In Page 7903 (Hindi Notification) and in Page 7906 (English Notification) for the Village
“44.Sadayankuppam” of “Taluk- Ponneri, District- Tiruvallur, State-Tamil Nadu” may be read as
“44.Sadayankuppam” of “Taluk- Thiruvottiyur, District- Tiruvallur, State-Tamil Nadu”
The other contents of the notification remain unaltered.
[F. No. R-11025(11)/99/2017-OR-I/E-8030]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
नई दली, 15 मई, 2018
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 810
810
810
810.—केीय सरकार, पेोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूिम म उपयोग के अिधकार का अज न) अिधिनयम
1962 (1962 का 50) (िजसे इसम इसके पQात उ- अिधिनयम कहा गया है) क( धारा 3 क( उप-धारा (1) भारत के राजप4,
(असाधारण) के अधीन जारी क( गयी भारत सरकार के पेोिलयम और *ाकृितक गैस मं4ालय क( अिधसूचना का.आ. 334(अ), तारीख
27 जनवरी 2017, )वारा तिमलनाडु राKय म एHोर - ितIवलूर - बगलुI - पांिडचेरी - नागपLMनम - मदुरै - टूLटकोLरन पाइपलाइन
िबछाई जानी चािहए के पLरवहन के िलए इंिडयन ऑयल कापUरेशन िलिमटेड के )ारा पाइपलाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए;
और उ- आिधसूचना क( *ितयाँ जनता को तारीख 09.02.2017 को उपलWद करा दी गई थी।
और उ- अिधिनयम क( धारा 6 क( उप - धारा (1) के अनुसरण म सYम *ािधकारी ने केीय सरकार को अपनी Lरपोट दे दी
है।
और केीय सरकार का उ- Lरपोट पर िवचार करने के पQात यह समाधान हो गया है क इस अिधसूचना से संलZ अनुसूची
म िविन[द\ भूिम म उपयोग के अिधकार का अज न कया जाना चािहए।
अत: अब, केीय सरकार,उ- अिधिनयम क( धारा 6 क( उप-धारा(1) )ारा *द+ शि-य. का *योग करते 0ए यह घोषणा
करती है क इस अिधसूचना के संलZ अनुसूची म िविन[द\ उ- भूिम म पाइपलाइन िबछाने के िलए उपयोग का अिधकार अOजत कया
जाता है।
यह और क केीय सरकार, उ- अिधिनयम क( धारा 6 क( उप-धारा(4) )ारा *द+ शि-य. का *योग करते 0ए यह िनद`श
देती है क उ- भूिम के उपयोग का अिधकार इस अिधसूचना के *काश क( तारीख से केीय सरकार म िनिहत होने क( बजाए, सभी
िवलंगम. से मु- हो कर इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपUरेशन िलिमटेड म िनिहत होगा।
3868
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
पैोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन अिधिनयम, 1962 क( धारा 10 के अधीन कसी भी YितपूOत के िलए इंिडयन ऑयल
कॉपUरेशन िलिमटेड पूण तया उ+रदायी होगी और पाइपलाइन से सcबिधत कसी भी मामले पर केीय सरकार के िवId कोई वाद
दावा या कानूनी काय वाही नहe हो सकेगी।
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
िजला : रामनाथपुरम
राKय : तिमलनाडू
तालुका का नाम
गाँव का नाम
सव`Yण सं.
उप ख;ड सं.
Yे4फल
हेhटेर
एयर
वग मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
रामनाथपुरम
53 वालातरवै
202
4
00
01
80
202
5बी
00
08
65
96
4ए
00
14
75
96
5ए
00
08
90
96
3
00
17
00
96
2
00
00
40
96
1
00
01
30
95
6डी
00
00
40
95
6ई
00
00
40
95
7
00
10
70
95
3
00
01
45
95
2
00
05
50
95
1
00
07
00
98
2
00
11
90
99
9
00
14
95
99
8
00
03
10
99
5
00
04
70
99
4
00
02
35
99
3
00
02
30
99
1
00
08
30
88
5सी
00
03
95
88
4सी
00
03
90
100
1
00
26
40
100
2ए
00
01
40
101
5ए
00
13
30
101
4बी2
00
00
40
101
5बी
00
15
60
101
5सी
00
01
35
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3869
101
3
00
05
25
101
6ए
00
13
50
102
2
00
08
80
102
3
00
17
60
102
4ए
00
07
00
109
5बी
00
12
10
109
5ए2
00
08
45
109
5ए1
00
06
10
110
9बी
00
04
70
110
9ए
00
04
80
114
2बी1
00
11
50
114
2ए1
00
05
20
114
2ए2
00
00
40
114
1बी2
00
10
30
115
3ए
00
06
25
115
2
00
10
45
113
4
00
16
80
113
5ए
00
02
85
112
3
00
11
50
112
2इी
00
02
15
112
2सी
00
02
70
112
2बी
00
02
35
112
2ए
00
02
30
112
1बी
00
08
10
रामनाथपुरम
52 कुयवनकुडी
181
6सी
00
09
90
181
6बी2
00
08
95
182
1बी
00
08
95
182
2
00
08
85
182
3
00
07
00
183
3
00
21
60
183
2
00
10
90
183
4बी
00
10
50
184
1बी2
00
19
00
184
1बी1
00
04
10
3870
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
185
3सी
00
15
80
185
3बी
00
18
25
189
1
00
06
35
189
2बी
00
04
90
189
2ए
00
03
50
190
1ए1
00
07
95
190
1ए2
00
01
95
168
4सी
00
05
70
167
1ए
00
12
15
167
3बी1
00
01
15
167
3बी2ए
00
09
40
167
3बी2बी
00
02
00
167
3ए
00
06
75
166
1सी
00
00
40
166
1बी
00
09
70
166
2ए2
00
05
15
166
2ए1
00
00
80
166
3ए
00
09
30
166
4
00
22
30
रामनाथपुरम
46 सiरiोMै
355
2
00
04
50
355
3
00
07
50
355
1ए1
00
06
60
354
2
00
02
70
354
1
00
03
55
351
9
00
00
85
351
12
00
05
45
351
11सी
00
05
45
351
11ए
00
05
25
351
5
00
07
90
351
2ए
00
06
50
351
3ए
00
06
60
351
3बी
00
05
30
361
1ए
00
01
90
361
1बी
00
10
65
361
2
00
00
40
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3871
361
1सी
00
00
40
347
1
00
01
25
347
2ए
00
23
20
347
2बी
00
12
00
362
2
00
02
35
362
3बी
00
06
75
362
4
00
07
20
363
1ए
00
03
25
363
1बी
00
03
30
363
2
00
07
70
363
3
00
06
45
537
3बी
00
12
95
536
4
00
04
50
536
8ए
00
16
40
536
8बी1
00
00
40
536
6
00
07
40
536
7
00
00
65
535
3
00
14
50
534
1
00
12
30
534
3
00
06
50
526
3ए
00
05
00
526
3बी
00
04
20
526
2ए
00
05
85
526
1बी
00
00
40
527
1
00
01
50
527
2
00
02
30
527
4बी
00
03
15
527
5
00
04
15
527
3ए1
00
00
65
527
3ए2
00
02
50
527
3बी
00
03
20
527
3सी
00
03
55
527
3इी
00
03
50
528
3
00
08
20
528
4ए
00
04
40
3872
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
528
4बी
00
04
30
528
5
00
08
35
528
6
00
08
55
528
7
00
08
00
528
8सी
00
04
25
528
9-1
00
03
70
528
9-2
00
03
35
529
1
00
06
45
529
2
00
05
90
529
3
00
05
70
529
4
00
05
55
529
5
00
06
55
502
1ए
00
15
30
502
3ए
00
20
35
504
1बी1ए1
00
28
65
504
2ए1ए
00
05
30
504
2ए1बी
00
05
00
504
2बी
00
05
15
504
3ए
00
05
30
504
3बी
00
04
10
504
4
00
06
90
506
1
00
05
70
506
2
00
03
80
506
3
00
03
95
506
4ए4
00
03
85
506
4सी
00
03
75
506
4बी
00
03
20
506
4इी
00
03
70
506
4ई
00
01
60
500
1
00
02
00
499
1ए
00
08
80
499
2
00
11
35
499
3ए
00
11
10
क(लकरै
47 कुदiोMै
19
6
00
01
70
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3873
19
5
00
09
60
19
4
00
00
80
20
1सी
00
04
55
20
1इी
00
02
80
20
1जे
00
00
60
20
1आई
00
02
80
20
1एच
00
00
85
20
1के
00
03
70
20
1ओ
00
03
30
20
1एन
00
00
95
20
1आर
00
01
15
20
1एस
00
02
45
20
1यु
00
02
70
20
1इजत
00
01
65
20
1वी
00
00
90
20
1वाई
00
00
60
20
1एhस
00
01
70
20
1डबलयू
00
00
80
20
2ए
00
01
30
21
1ए
00
02
10
21
1बी
00
11
40
21
1ई
00
00
60
21
1इी
00
01
65
21
1सी
00
05
80
25
1
00
00
85
26
1ए1
00
06
80
26
1बी
00
02
70
26
1सी
00
03
20
26
2ए
00
03
60
26
2बी
00
02
70
27
2ए4
00
04
35
27
2बी
00
05
45
27
2सी
00
06
45
27
4ए
00
13
60
3874
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
28
6बी
00
15
10
28
6ए
00
19
40
30
8सी
00
00
90
38
3ए
00
12
10
38
4ए
00
08
00
38
4सी1
00
10
10
39
2
00
15
30
39
3जी
00
04
10
39
3आई
00
04
45
39
3जे
00
08
40
39
3एल
00
01
65
39
5
00
03
00
42
5
00
00
60
43
7ए
00
02
00
43
1ए
00
07
10
43
2
00
06
00
43
3ए
00
01
25
151
1इी
00
06
80
151
2ए3
00
03
65
151
1सी
00
01
90
151
2ए2
00
00
60
151
2सी
00
00
60
151
2इी2
00
02
70
151
2ई2
00
02
25
151
3ए2
00
04
50
151
5
00
02
55
151
3बी1
00
01
45
151
4ए2
00
00
60
151
4ए1
00
00
60
152
2बी2
00
00
80
152
2बी1
00
01
10
153
1जी
00
00
65
153
1इी
00
02
80
153
1ई
00
03
00
153
1एफ
00
03
25
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3875
153
2ए
00
08
45
153
3बी
00
09
00
153
4
00
10
10
153
5इी
00
03
40
153
5सी
00
03
00
153
5के1
00
04
80
153
5के2
00
01
10
155
11
00
01
90
155
14ए
00
00
40
155
15ए
00
00
60
155
13ए
00
02
30
155
4बी2
00
00
80
155
4इी
00
04
30
156
1ए
00
05
50
156
1बी
00
07
90
क(लकरै
46 ितIEपुलानी
67
2
00
00
75
67
1ए
00
07
20
67
1बी
00
01
90
66
5ए
00
04
75
66
5बी
00
01
90
65
8इी
00
00
70
65
9जी2
00
05
00
65
9एच
00
00
40
65
9एफ
00
00
70
65
9ई
00
05
45
65
10
00
00
60
65
9इी
00
00
90
65
9सी
00
07
20
65
9बी
00
03
30
69
3ए3
00
10
20
69
1बी
00
02
45
69
1सी
00
06
70
69
2
00
18
40
62
4बी
00
00
60
70
1
00
08
50
3876
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
70
2
00
01
10
59
4
00
11
00
59
5ए
00
03
55
59
5बी
00
04
40
59
6
00
10
75
59
7ए
00
04
30
59
7बी
00
02
80
59
3
00
01
95
58
5
00
00
60
58
2बी
00
05
20
58
2सी
00
00
60
58
2ए
00
03
60
58
3ए
00
01
50
58
1
00
11
90
48
00
02
00
50
12
00
17
85
52
6
00
02
80
52
5
00
14
00
52
7
00
00
60
52
3
00
00
60
53
1बी
00
02
55
53
2
00
01
45
53
3
00
05
00
53
4
00
14
00
53
5ए
00
03
00
53
5बी
00
03
20
53
6
00
02
95
42
1ए
00
08
30
42
1बी
00
07
85
42
2बी
00
01
50
42
2सी
00
01
45
42
3ए
00
02
60
42
4
00
03
20
42
5
00
02
80
42
6
00
02
70
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3877
42
7
00
01
90
42
8ए
00
00
60
43
4जे1
00
06
30
43
4जे2
00
00
60
43
4आई2
00
06
20
43
4एच2
00
02
90
41
00
09
80
78
00
18
40
79
00
01
60
124
1ए2
00
11
60
124
1ए1
00
07
10
128
2
00
23
75
137
9
00
03
05
137
13
00
10
35
137
14
00
07
95
136
2ए2
00
03
55
136
2बी
00
08
90
137
15
00
08
65
137
16
00
09
55
136
1जी
00
00
85
135
3
00
07
60
135
2
00
10
00
135
1
00
07
40
149
2एफ
00
00
60
149
2जी
00
03
10
149
2एच
00
05
10
149
2आई
00
03
75
149
3ए
00
02
60
149
1एफ
00
09
00
149
1सी
00
02
80
149
1इी
00
07
20
157
5
00
18
55
158
11
00
00
60
158
9सी
00
07
00
158
8
00
08
40
3878
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
158
7
00
09
20
158
6बी
00
09
40
158
5
00
02
90
158
4
00
03
40
158
3
00
02
10
158
2इी
00
00
40
162
2सी2
00
00
60
162
2बी2
00
05
30
162
2ए2
00
04
65
162
2ए1
00
05
30
162
1एफ
00
02
90
162
1ई
00
00
95
162
1इी
00
00
60
171
1
00
16
95
174
00
17
60
175
01
24
00
क(लकरै
42 कलरी
392
9
00
15
75
392
10
00
01
10
392
8
00
09
80
392
1बी3
00
07
20
375
5बी
00
13
45
375
5ए
00
06
80
375
2
00
06
70
374
5
00
06
80
374
3
00
12
60
374
2बी
00
09
35
374
1सी
00
04
20
376
1ए
00
00
60
377
7ई
00
01
10
377
7इी
00
01
60
377
7सी
00
01
40
377
7बी
00
01
85
377
6बी
00
07
70
377
6ए
00
09
45
373
5बी
00
01
00
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3879
373
5ए
00
00
60
377
1
00
06
50
350
1
00
04
60
350
2
00
13
60
350
3
00
01
05
349
4ए
00
04
50
349
7
00
04
00
349
6
00
04
30
349
5
00
08
50
349
9
00
10
50
345
1
00
01
05
346
7
00
09
00
346
6बी
00
04
10
346
6ए
00
05
00
346
5
00
09
30
346
4
00
19
20
341
4
00
10
65
341
2
00
07
10
341
3बी
00
05
90
341
3ए
00
13
20
340
9
00
03
90
331
1
00
08
50
292
4
00
08
20
292
3
00
08
20
292
2
00
08
90
287
1
00
03
50
288
2
00
13
20
288
1
00
13
90
290
2ए
00
06
10
290
1
00
20
00
277
2बी
00
15
80
278
4
00
11
65
278
1
00
19
20
266
2बी
00
05
10
266
2सी
00
12
30
3880
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
266
3
00
13
00
266
4
00
12
25
264
1
00
03
20
262
5
00
22
10
262
6ए
00
02
20
261
11सी
00
00
45
क(लकरै
41 कुलपदम
99
1
00
00
80
100
1
00
16
00
98
2सी2
00
00
80
98
7
00
08
85
98
9
00
05
55
98
8
00
06
50
97
2बी
00
04
20
97
2ए
00
06
40
97
1
00
05
70
2
7
00
01
30
2
6
00
04
50
2
8ए
00
02
40
2
8बी
00
04
00
3
3ए
00
07
20
3
3बी
00
08
30
3
8
00
19
20
4
5
00
00
80
4
4
00
16
80
16
3
00
05
50
17
3ए
00
12
20
17
3बी
00
01
00
17
2
00
14
40
17
1
00
02
70
18
1
00
07
60
19
7
00
06
00
19
10
00
09
60
21
3ए
00
07
25
21
2
00
00
80
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3881
21
3बी
00
04
20
21
4बी
00
06
75
21
7
00
06
95
24
3
00
00
80
24
1बी
00
10
10
24
2
00
01
50
30
2
00
05
75
30
5बी
00
02
00
30
4
00
00
80
30
5सी
00
02
20
30
5ई
00
03
20
30
7
00
01
00
30
6
00
07
80
29
1
00
11
10
33
4ए
00
05
10
33
4बी
00
12
80
33
5
00
10
80
33
2
00
03
20
34
2ए2
00
14
10
34
2बी
00
07
30
37
5
00
15
15
37
4
00
00
95
36
3सी
00
00
80
36
2बी
00
07
80
36
2ए
00
09
20
36
1ए
00
13
00
36
1बी
00
15
75
40
4ए
00
09
55
40
3ए
00
05
40
39
00
06
30
40
2
00
06
10
40
1
00
20
20
45
1ए
00
07
10
क(लकरै
33 वेलनूर
90
1
00
04
55
90
2
00
05
25
3882
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
90
3
00
03
35
90
4
00
04
85
89
1
00
06
05
89
4
00
08
25
89
5
00
05
45
91
1
00
24
20
87
1ई1
00
10
25
87
2ए
00
12
90
87
2बी
00
11
25
87
2इी
00
07
95
86
2
00
03
30
86
3इी
00
04
30
84
00
16
45
83
3
00
13
15
83
4
00
11
90
85
1
00
02
10
85
2
00
00
40
81
2
00
42
45
110
2
00
28
20
110
1
00
08
00
111
1
00
13
20
111
4
00
00
40
111
3
00
06
40
76
1
00
05
45
76
2
00
29
55
76
3
00
14
35
118
1ए
00
10
35
119
2
00
00
60
119
3
00
10
80
120
1
00
15
60
120
3
00
21
80
120
2
00
06
80
121
1
00
14
10
121
2
00
14
50
122
2
00
17
30
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3883
122
3
00
08
65
122
4
00
08
85
124
1
00
07
70
124
2ए
00
01
60
124
3
00
00
40
123
2
00
00
50
123
3ए
00
06
40
123
3बी
00
05
00
123
3सी
00
02
40
123
4ए
00
01
85
123
4बी
00
04
75
123
4सी
00
04
65
126
1
00
24
45
127
2ए
00
05
90
127
3
00
08
15
129
1ए
00
07
00
129
1बी
00
02
50
129
2बी
00
05
00
129
2सी
00
02
00
129
3ए
00
00
70
129
3बी
00
00
40
128
1बी
00
12
30
128
3
00
06
80
128
4सी
00
01
10
134
3
00
02
05
134
2
00
04
40
134
4
00
06
90
134
9
00
04
50
134
8
00
00
40
134
7ए
00
01
30
134
7बी
00
07
75
135
1सी
00
10
25
135
2बी
00
04
65
155
7ए
00
00
45
156
2इी
00
06
40
3884
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
156
2सी
00
00
90
156
3
00
10
70
156
6
00
11
85
156
7ए
00
04
00
156
7बी
00
03
80
156
7सी
00
03
90
157
1ए
00
03
00
157
1बी
00
03
10
157
2
00
06
25
157
4ए
00
01
50
157
5
00
04
20
157
6
00
02
60
157
7
00
04
10
157
8/बी
00
04
00
157
8/ए
00
00
40
157
8/सी
00
05
30
164
2ए
00
01
20
164
2बी
00
04
90
164
7
00
10
80
164
8ए
00
00
70
164
6
00
21
80
163
4
00
03
00
165
5
00
00
40
165
6/बी
00
00
85
165
7/बी
00
01
60
165
8
00
11
10
166
2ए
00
00
40
166
1ए
00
08
40
166
1बी
00
04
75
166
3ए
00
00
40
220
1ए
00
04
40
221
9बी
00
05
30
221
2
00
05
00
221
5
00
07
10
221
7
00
02
80
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3885
222
10बी
00
01
40
222
10ए
00
13
85
222
9
00
12
65
222
8
00
04
45
222
6बी
00
00
40
238
1ए
00
08
30
238
1बी
00
01
50
224
1ए1
00
22
25
226
1ए
00
06
60
226
1बी
00
06
45
226
2ए
00
05
80
226
3ए
00
02
80
229
2ए
00
16
90
क(लकरै
32 पनैयिडयेदल
34
3
00
07
90
34
4
00
04
50
35
2
00
04
65
35
3ई
00
09
10
43
1
00
11
20
43
2इी
00
00
40
43
2सी
00
04
85
43
2बी
00
08
45
43
2ए
00
05
70
43
2एच
00
02
25
45
00
11
95
46
1बी
00
00
40
46
1सी
00
02
80
46
2ई
00
06
25
46
3
00
07
20
49
1ए
00
03
10
49
1बी
00
03
20
49
1सी
00
03
20
49
1इी
00
04
40
49
1ई
00
04
70
49
1एफ
00
03
80
49
1जी
00
01
50
3886
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
47
1ए6
00
04
10
49
1एच
00
00
40
47
1बी2
00
05
10
47
1बी3ए
00
04
50
47
1बी3बी
00
04
90
47
12
00
01
15
47
13
00
00
60
47
14
00
00
40
47
2सी
00
00
40
47
11
00
12
00
47
2इी
00
01
80
47
2ई
00
01
40
56
7ए
00
03
10
56
7बी
00
01
95
56
7सी
00
02
20
56
7इी
00
02
00
56
6ए
00
08
10
56
4ए
00
02
40
56
4बी
00
04
20
56
4सी
00
00
40
56
4इी
00
05
05
55
1
00
09
90
57
5
00
00
40
57
6
00
00
70
57
7
00
01
70
57
10सी
00
02
60
57
10बी
00
05
40
58
4
00
09
30
58
3बी
00
07
60
165
6
00
03
30
165
5
00
05
90
165
1सी
00
00
40
165
7
00
00
50
165
4बी
00
12
00
165
4ए
00
00
40
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3887
155
8
00
09
10
155
9
00
08
50
155
10बी
00
04
95
155
10सी
00
01
90
154
12
00
06
90
157
1
00
02
50
157
2
00
04
80
154
13
00
02
10
157
3
00
08
00
153
15
00
11
50
153
16बी
00
11
40
141
7ए
00
08
30
141
5
00
03
20
141
8ए
00
00
40
141
6बी
00
10
40
140
1
00
00
40
139
2
00
04
70
139
3सी
00
04
95
139
9
00
00
40
139
8
00
09
70
139
7
00
05
00
138
2बी
00
00
95
138
2ए
00
03
55
138
6ए
00
02
30
138
6बी
00
02
25
138
8ए
00
02
40
138
8बी
00
01
60
138
9
00
04
35
137
1ए
00
28
20
203
2
00
32
80
232
4
00
27
50
231
2बी
00
03
60
231
3ए
00
03
50
231
3बी
00
03
55
230
1
00
08
90
3888
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
230
2
00
08
95
230
3ए1
00
09
80
230
3ए2
00
12
95
230
3बी
00
11
80
230
3सी
00
15
95
220
1
00
11
65
220
2ए
00
03
55
220
2बी
00
03
10
220
3
00
05
25
220
4
00
05
20
220
7
00
14
20
220
8ए
00
05
10
220
9ए
00
04
90
220
10ए
00
04
85
कडलाड़ी
50 िसiल
259
5ई
00
00
80
260
1
00
15
40
260
2
00
06
15
258
4सी
00
09
35
261
00
32
40
248
2
00
00
40
248
5
00
02
60
248
6
00
05
40
248
10
00
05
40
248
8
00
15
40
248
9
00
01
20
247
4
00
04
50
247
3
00
04
50
247
2
00
04
70
247
1
00
05
00
50
1ए1
00
02
90
50
1ए2
00
09
00
49
2सी
00
06
85
49
2इी3
00
15
40
49
2इी5
00
00
40
49
2इी4
00
06
25
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3889
49
2इी2
00
00
40
51
1ए
00
18
00
52
1ए
00
17
20
52
1बी
00
00
40
कडलाड़ी
42 पिनवासल
300
2
00
26
65
300
7
00
04
00
300
3
00
07
20
300
4
00
10
45
299
6बी
00
00
80
294
1
00
12
25
294
2
00
00
50
293
5
00
01
70
293
4
00
13
30
295
6ए
00
04
20
295
6बी
00
14
70
295
5
00
00
40
295
1सी
00
11
50
296
3
00
07
20
296
4
00
00
40
296
6
00
03
00
296
5
00
10
50
289
8
00
00
40
289
7
00
03
00
289
1
00
12
00
289
2ए
00
00
80
282
10
00
08
30
284
3
00
06
00
284
2
00
06
00
284
1
00
00
40
284
4
00
08
30
284
5
00
02
30
283
8बी
00
11
50
283
7
00
01
30
283
6
00
10
80
283
5
00
03
25
3890
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
331
4
00
01
30
331
2
00
06
70
331
1
00
08
50
272
7
00
03
80
273
1
00
08
20
250
10
00
18
20
247
2ई
00
02
20
247
2एफ
00
04
85
247
2जी
00
04
20
247
2एच
00
07
60
247
2आई
00
00
65
247
2के
00
12
15
247
2एल
00
00
70
कडलाड़ी
41 पेयhकुलम
49
2
00
17
70
49
1
00
15
50
48
4ए
00
01
30
48
4बी
00
04
00
48
3सी
00
07
60
50
1ए
00
00
40
51
9
00
07
10
51
3सी
00
03
30
51
3बी
00
01
00
51
3ई
00
02
80
51
3इी2
00
01
80
51
3इी1
00
03
80
51
8ए
00
00
70
51
4बी
00
12
55
51
4ए
00
00
45
51
6ए
00
00
40
51
5ए
00
13
80
53
2सी
00
00
70
53
3ए
00
00
40
53
2इी
00
15
10
53
2ई
00
07
60
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3891
57
8
00
07
50
57
9ए
00
00
40
57
7ए
00
06
10
57
7बी
00
07
20
57
3इी
00
05
60
57
3सी
00
00
40
57
6बी2
00
00
40
57
6बी1
00
00
80
57
4
00
02
75
57
6ए
00
05
90
57
5ए
00
04
90
57
5बी
00
05
40
70
5ए
00
10
80
70
4बी
00
03
60
70
2
00
11
90
70
3ए
00
01
30
70
3बी
00
00
40
56
00
00
40
72
1बी
00
07
40
72
1ए
00
00
60
72
1सी
00
11
70
76
14
00
00
40
76
15
00
07
20
76
16
00
00
40
76
5एफ
00
02
15
76
5ई
00
00
75
76
5इी
00
00
40
76
3बी
00
02
20
76
3ए
00
06
75
76
2ए2
00
06
80
76
2ए1
00
01
85
76
2बी2
00
00
40
76
2बी1
00
00
55
77
4
00
09
40
77
5
00
02
20
3892
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
77
7ए
00
03
95
83
7सी
00
01
35
83
8
00
06
30
83
6ई
00
03
50
83
6एफ
00
05
00
83
6जी
00
01
35
84
8ए
00
07
40
84
7ए
00
04
85
84
1बी
00
01
35
84
1ए
00
10
75
88
10बी
00
02
90
88
10ए
00
03
45
88
11ए
00
03
85
88
9
00
04
30
88
5
00
03
80
88
4
00
04
35
88
2सी
00
00
40
88
2बी
00
00
40
88
2ए
00
00
40
88
3ए
00
03
65
90
6बी4
00
02
35
90
6बी3
00
02
10
90
6बी2
00
03
50
90
6बी1
00
03
05
90
6ए
00
00
80
89
7आई
00
02
70
89
7ई
00
12
00
89
6
00
15
00
89
4बी
00
00
50
89
4ए
00
02
35
89
5ए
00
00
90
93
2सी4
00
01
10
93
5बी
00
09
00
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3893
93
2बी4
00
01
40
93
2बी3
00
01
40
93
4
00
07
50
93
2बी2
00
02
65
93
3ए
00
04
90
94
4के
00
00
40
94
4एल
00
12
50
94
4एम
00
00
55
94
4जे
00
15
85
94
4ई
00
06
15
94
4बी
00
03
60
94
3बी
00
00
40
94
2
00
02
05
95
1
00
15
90
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/99/2017-ओआर-I/ई-8030]
पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018
S.O. 810.—Whereas, by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural
Gas number S.O.No.334(E) dated: 27.01.2017 issued under sub section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals
Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (herein after referred to as the said Act) the
Central Government declared its intention to acquire the Right of User in the Lands specified in the Schedule appended
to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of Natural Gas, a pipeline “Ennore-
Tiruvallur -Bengaluru -Pondicherry -Nagapattinam –Madurai- Tuticorin” should be laid in the State of Tamil Nadu by
Indian Oil Corporation Limited.
And whereas, copies of the said notifications were made available to the public from 09.02.2017.
And whereas, the Competent Authority in pursuance of sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act has
submitted his report to the Central Government;
And whereas, the Central Government, after considering the said report is satisfied that the Right of User in
the Land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification should be acquired;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central
Government hereby declares that the Right of User in the said Land specified in the Schedule appended to this
notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central
Government hereby directs that the Right of User in the said Land shall instead of vesting in the Central Government,
vest from the date of publication of this declaration, in the Indian Oil Corporation Limited free from all encumbrances.
Indian Oil Corporation Limited shall be exclusively liable for any compensation in terms of section 10 of the
P & M P Act, 1962 and no suit, claim or legal proceeding would lie against the Central Government on any matter
relating to pipeline.
3894
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
SCHEDULE
District : Ramanathapuram
State : Tamil Nadu
Name of the Taluk
Name of the Village
Survey No.
Sub
Division
No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Square
Meter
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Ramanathapuram
53. Valantharavai
202
4
00
01
80
202
5B
00
08
65
96
4A
00
14
75
96
5A
00
08
90
96
3
00
17
00
96
2
00
00
40
96
1
00
01
30
95
6D
00
00
40
95
6E
00
00
40
95
7
00
10
70
95
3
00
01
45
95
2
00
05
50
95
1
00
07
00
98
2
00
11
90
99
9
00
14
95
99
8
00
03
10
99
5
00
04
70
99
4
00
02
35
99
3
00
02
30
99
1
00
08
30
88
5C
00
03
95
88
4C
00
03
90
100
1
00
26
40
100
2A
00
01
40
101
5A
00
13
30
101
4B2
00
00
40
101
5B
00
15
60
101
5C
00
01
35
101
3
00
05
25
101
6A
00
13
50
102
2
00
08
80
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3895
102
3
00
17
60
102
4A
00
07
00
109
5B
00
12
10
109
5A2
00
08
45
109
5A1
00
06
10
110
9B
00
04
70
110
9A
00
04
80
114
2B1
00
11
50
114
2A1
00
05
20
114
2A2
00
00
40
114
1B2
00
10
30
115
3A
00
06
25
115
2
00
10
45
113
4
00
16
80
113
5A
00
02
85
112
3
00
11
50
112
2D
00
02
15
112
2C
00
02
70
112
2B
00
02
35
112
2A
00
02
30
112
1B
00
08
10
Ramanathapuram
52. Kuyavankudi
181
6C
00
09
90
181
6B2
00
08
95
182
1B
00
08
95
182
2
00
08
85
182
3
00
07
00
183
3
00
21
60
183
2
00
10
90
183
4B
00
10
50
184
1B2
00
19
00
184
1B1
00
04
10
185
3C
00
15
80
185
3B
00
18
25
189
1
00
06
35
189
2B
00
04
90
189
2A
00
03
50
190
1A1
00
07
95
3896
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
190
1A2
00
01
95
168
4C
00
05
70
167
1A
00
12
15
167
3B1
00
01
15
167
3B2A
00
09
40
167
3B2B
00
02
00
167
3A
00
06
75
166
1C
00
00
40
166
1B
00
09
70
166
2A2
00
05
15
166
2A1
00
00
80
166
3A
00
09
30
166
4
00
22
30
Ramanathapuram
46. Sakkarakottai
355
2
00
04
50
355
3
00
07
50
355
1A1
00
06
60
354
2
00
02
70
354
1
00
03
55
351
9
00
00
85
351
12
00
05
45
351
11C
00
05
45
351
11A
00
05
25
351
5
00
07
90
351
2A
00
06
50
351
3A
00
06
60
351
3B
00
05
30
361
1A
00
01
90
361
1B
00
10
65
361
2
00
00
40
361
1C
00
00
40
347
1
00
01
25
347
2A
00
23
20
347
2B
00
12
00
362
2
00
02
35
362
3B
00
06
75
362
4
00
07
20
363
1A
00
03
25
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3897
363
1B
00
03
30
363
2
00
07
70
363
3
00
06
45
537
3B
00
12
95
536
4
00
04
50
536
8A
00
16
40
536
8B1
00
00
40
536
6
00
07
40
536
7
00
00
65
535
3
00
14
50
534
1
00
12
30
534
3
00
06
50
526
3A
00
05
00
526
3B
00
04
20
526
2A
00
05
85
526
1B
00
00
40
527
1
00
01
50
527
2
00
02
30
527
4B
00
03
15
527
5
00
04
15
527
3A1
00
00
65
527
3A2
00
02
50
527
3B
00
03
20
527
3C
00
03
55
527
3D
00
03
50
528
3
00
08
20
528
4A
00
04
40
528
4B
00
04
30
528
5
00
08
35
528
6
00
08
55
528
7
00
08
00
528
8C
00
04
25
528
9-1
00
03
70
528
9-2
00
03
35
529
1
00
06
45
529
2
00
05
90
529
3
00
05
70
3898
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
529
4
00
05
55
529
5
00
06
55
502
1A
00
15
30
502
3A
00
20
35
504
1B1A1
00
28
65
504
2A1A
00
05
30
504
2A1B
00
05
00
504
2B
00
05
15
504
3A
00
05
30
504
3B
00
04
10
504
4
00
06
90
506
1
00
05
70
506
2
00
03
80
506
3
00
03
95
506
4A4
00
03
85
506
4C
00
03
75
506
4B
00
03
20
506
4D
00
03
70
506
4E
00
01
60
500
1
00
02
00
499
1A
00
08
80
499
2
00
11
35
499
3A
00
11
10
Kilakarai
47. Kudhakkottai
19
6
00
01
70
19
5
00
09
60
19
4
00
00
80
20
1C
00
04
55
20
1D
00
02
80
20
1J
00
00
60
20
1I
00
02
80
20
1H
00
00
85
20
1K
00
03
70
20
1O
00
03
30
20
1N
00
00
95
20
1R
00
01
15
20
1S
00
02
45
20
1U
00
02
70
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3899
20
1Z
00
01
65
20
1V
00
00
90
20
1Y
00
00
60
20
1X
00
01
70
20
1W
00
00
80
20
2A
00
01
30
21
1A
00
02
10
21
1B
00
11
40
21
1E
00
00
60
21
1D
00
01
65
21
1C
00
05
80
25
1
00
00
85
26
1A1
00
06
80
26
1B
00
02
70
26
1C
00
03
20
26
2A
00
03
60
26
2B
00
02
70
27
2A4
00
04
35
27
2B
00
05
45
27
2C
00
06
45
27
4A
00
13
60
28
6B
00
15
10
28
6A
00
19
40
30
8C
00
00
90
38
3A
00
12
10
38
4A
00
08
00
38
4C1
00
10
10
39
2
00
15
30
39
3G
00
04
10
39
3I
00
04
45
39
3J
00
08
40
39
3L
00
01
65
39
5
00
03
00
42
5
00
00
60
43
7A
00
02
00
43
1A
00
07
10
43
2
00
06
00
3900
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
43
3A
00
01
25
151
1D
00
06
80
151
2A3
00
03
65
151
1C
00
01
90
151
2A2
00
00
60
151
2C
00
00
60
151
2D2
00
02
70
151
2E2
00
02
25
151
3A2
00
04
50
151
5
00
02
55
151
3B1
00
01
45
151
4A2
00
00
60
151
4A1
00
00
60
152
2B2
00
00
80
152
2B1
00
01
10
153
1G
00
00
65
153
1D
00
02
80
153
1E
00
03
00
153
1F
00
03
25
153
2A
00
08
45
153
3B
00
09
00
153
4
00
10
10
153
5D
00
03
40
153
5C
00
03
00
153
5K1
00
04
80
153
5K2
00
01
10
155
11
00
01
90
155
14A
00
00
40
155
15A
00
00
60
155
13A
00
02
30
155
4B2
00
00
80
155
4D
00
04
30
156
1A
00
05
50
156
1B
00
07
90
Kilakarai
46. Tiruppullani
67
2
00
00
75
67
1A
00
07
20
67
1B
00
01
90
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3901
66
5A
00
04
75
66
5B
00
01
90
65
8D
00
00
70
65
9G2
00
05
00
65
9H
00
00
40
65
9F
00
00
70
65
9E
00
05
45
65
10
00
00
60
65
9D
00
00
90
65
9C
00
07
20
65
9B
00
03
30
69
3A3
00
10
20
69
1B
00
02
45
69
1C
00
06
70
69
2
00
18
40
62
4B
00
00
60
70
1
00
08
50
70
2
00
01
10
59
4
00
11
00
59
5A
00
03
55
59
5B
00
04
40
59
6
00
10
75
59
7A
00
04
30
59
7B
00
02
80
59
3
00
01
95
58
5
00
00
60
58
2B
00
05
20
58
2C
00
00
60
58
2A
00
03
60
58
3A
00
01
50
58
1
00
11
90
48
00
02
00
50
12
00
17
85
52
6
00
02
80
52
5
00
14
00
52
7
00
00
60
52
3
00
00
60
3902
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
53
1B
00
02
55
53
2
00
01
45
53
3
00
05
00
53
4
00
14
00
53
5A
00
03
00
53
5B
00
03
20
53
6
00
02
95
42
1A
00
08
30
42
1B
00
07
85
42
2B
00
01
50
42
2C
00
01
45
42
3A
00
02
60
42
4
00
03
20
42
5
00
02
80
42
6
00
02
70
42
7
00
01
90
42
8A
00
00
60
43
4J1
00
06
30
43
4J2
00
00
60
43
4I2
00
06
20
43
4H2
00
02
90
41
00
09
80
78
00
18
40
79
00
01
60
124
1A2
00
11
60
124
1A1
00
07
10
128
2
00
23
75
137
9
00
03
05
137
13
00
10
35
137
14
00
07
95
136
2A2
00
03
55
136
2B
00
08
90
137
15
00
08
65
137
16
00
09
55
136
1G
00
00
85
135
3
00
07
60
135
2
00
10
00
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3903
135
1
00
07
40
149
2F
00
00
60
149
2G
00
03
10
149
2H
00
05
10
149
2I
00
03
75
149
3A
00
02
60
149
1F
00
09
00
149
1C
00
02
80
149
1D
00
07
20
157
5
00
18
55
158
11
00
00
60
158
9C
00
07
00
158
8
00
08
40
158
7
00
09
20
158
6B
00
09
40
158
5
00
02
90
158
4
00
03
40
158
3
00
02
10
158
2D
00
00
40
162
2C2
00
00
60
162
2B2
00
05
30
162
2A2
00
04
65
162
2A1
00
05
30
162
1F
00
02
90
162
1E
00
00
95
162
1D
00
00
60
171
1
00
16
95
174
00
17
60
175
01
24
00
Kilakarai
42. Kalari
392
9
00
15
75
392
10
00
01
10
392
8
00
09
80
392
1B3
00
07
20
375
5B
00
13
45
375
5A
00
06
80
375
2
00
06
70
374
5
00
06
80
3904
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
374
3
00
12
60
374
2B
00
09
35
374
1C
00
04
20
376
1A
00
00
60
377
7E
00
01
10
377
7D
00
01
60
377
7C
00
01
40
377
7B
00
01
85
377
6B
00
07
70
377
6A
00
09
45
373
5B
00
01
00
373
5A
00
00
60
377
1
00
06
50
350
1
00
04
60
350
2
00
13
60
350
3
00
01
05
349
4A
00
04
50
349
7
00
04
00
349
6
00
04
30
349
5
00
08
50
349
9
00
10
50
345
1
00
01
05
346
7
00
09
00
346
6B
00
04
10
346
6A
00
05
00
346
5
00
09
30
346
4
00
19
20
341
4
00
10
65
341
2
00
07
10
341
3B
00
05
90
341
3A
00
13
20
340
9
00
03
90
331
1
00
08
50
292
4
00
08
20
292
3
00
08
20
292
2
00
08
90
287
1
00
03
50
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3905
288
2
00
13
20
288
1
00
13
90
290
2A
00
06
10
290
1
00
20
00
277
2B
00
15
80
278
4
00
11
65
278
1
00
19
20
266
2B
00
05
10
266
2C
00
12
30
266
3
00
13
00
266
4
00
12
25
264
1
00
03
20
262
5
00
22
10
262
6A
00
02
20
261
11C
00
00
45
Kilakarai
41. Kulapatham
99
1
00
00
80
100
1
00
16
00
98
2C2
00
00
80
98
7
00
08
85
98
9
00
05
55
98
8
00
06
50
97
2B
00
04
20
97
2A
00
06
40
97
1
00
05
70
2
7
00
01
30
2
6
00
04
50
2
8A
00
02
40
2
8B
00
04
00
3
3A
00
07
20
3
3B
00
08
30
3
8
00
19
20
4
5
00
00
80
4
4
00
16
80
16
3
00
05
50
17
3A
00
12
20
17
3B
00
01
00
17
2
00
14
40
3906
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
17
1
00
02
70
18
1
00
07
60
19
7
00
06
00
19
10
00
09
60
21
3A
00
07
25
21
2
00
00
80
21
3B
00
04
20
21
4B
00
06
75
21
7
00
06
95
24
3
00
00
80
24
1B
00
10
10
24
2
00
01
50
30
2
00
05
75
30
5B
00
02
00
30
4
00
00
80
30
5C
00
02
20
30
5E
00
03
20
30
7
00
01
00
30
6
00
07
80
29
1
00
11
10
33
4A
00
05
10
33
4B
00
12
80
33
5
00
10
80
33
2
00
03
20
34
2A2
00
14
10
34
2B
00
07
30
37
5
00
15
15
37
4
00
00
95
36
3C
00
00
80
36
2B
00
07
80
36
2A
00
09
20
36
1A
00
13
00
36
1B
00
15
75
40
4A
00
09
55
40
3A
00
05
40
39
00
06
30
40
2
00
06
10
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3907
40
1
00
20
20
45
1A
00
07
10
Kilakarai
33. Velanur
90
1
00
04
55
90
2
00
05
25
90
3
00
03
35
90
4
00
04
85
89
1
00
06
05
89
4
00
08
25
89
5
00
05
45
91
1
00
24
20
87
1E1
00
10
25
87
2A
00
12
90
87
2B
00
11
25
87
2D
00
07
95
86
2
00
03
30
86
3D
00
04
30
84
00
16
45
83
3
00
13
15
83
4
00
11
90
85
1
00
02
10
85
2
00
00
40
81
2
00
42
45
110
2
00
28
20
110
1
00
08
00
111
1
00
13
20
111
4
00
00
40
111
3
00
06
40
76
1
00
05
45
76
2
00
29
55
76
3
00
14
35
118
1A
00
10
35
119
2
00
00
60
119
3
00
10
80
120
1
00
15
60
120
3
00
21
80
120
2
00
06
80
121
1
00
14
10
3908
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
121
2
00
14
50
122
2
00
17
30
122
3
00
08
65
122
4
00
08
85
124
1
00
07
70
124
2A
00
01
60
124
3
00
00
40
123
2
00
00
50
123
3A
00
06
40
123
3B
00
05
00
123
3C
00
02
40
123
4A
00
01
85
123
4B
00
04
75
123
4C
00
04
65
126
1
00
24
45
127
2A
00
05
90
127
3
00
08
15
129
1A
00
07
00
129
1B
00
02
50
129
2B
00
05
00
129
2C
00
02
00
129
3A
00
00
70
129
3B
00
00
40
128
1B
00
12
30
128
3
00
06
80
128
4C
00
01
10
134
3
00
02
05
134
2
00
04
40
134
4
00
06
90
134
9
00
04
50
134
8
00
00
40
134
7A
00
01
30
134
7B
00
07
75
135
1C
00
10
25
135
2B
00
04
65
155
7A
00
00
45
156
2D
00
06
40
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3909
156
2C
00
00
90
156
3
00
10
70
156
6
00
11
85
156
7A
00
04
00
156
7B
00
03
80
156
7C
00
03
90
157
1A
00
03
00
157
1B
00
03
10
157
2
00
06
25
157
4A
00
01
50
157
5
00
04
20
157
6
00
02
60
157
7
00
04
10
157
8/B
00
04
00
157
8/A
00
00
40
157
8/C
00
05
30
164
2A
00
01
20
164
2B
00
04
90
164
7
00
10
80
164
8A
00
00
70
164
6
00
21
80
163
4
00
03
00
165
5
00
00
40
165
6/B
00
00
85
165
7/B
00
01
60
165
8
00
11
10
166
2A
00
00
40
166
1A
00
08
40
166
1B
00
04
75
166
3A
00
00
40
220
1A
00
04
40
221
9B
00
05
30
221
2
00
05
00
221
5
00
07
10
221
7
00
02
80
222
10B
00
01
40
222
10A
00
13
85
3910
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
222
9
00
12
65
222
8
00
04
45
222
6B
00
00
40
238
1A
00
08
30
238
1B
00
01
50
224
1A1
00
22
25
226
1A
00
06
60
226
1B
00
06
45
226
2A
00
05
80
226
3A
00
02
80
229
2A
00
16
90
Kilakarai
32. Panaiyadiyendal
34
3
00
07
90
34
4
00
04
50
35
2
00
04
65
35
3E
00
09
10
43
1
00
11
20
43
2D
00
00
40
43
2C
00
04
85
43
2B
00
08
45
43
2A
00
05
70
43
2H
00
02
25
45
00
11
95
46
1B
00
00
40
46
1C
00
02
80
46
2E
00
06
25
46
3
00
07
20
49
1A
00
03
10
49
1B
00
03
20
49
1C
00
03
20
49
1D
00
04
40
49
1E
00
04
70
49
1F
00
03
80
49
1G
00
01
50
47
1A6
00
04
10
49
1H
00
00
40
47
1B2
00
05
10
47
1B3A
00
04
50
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3911
47
1B3B
00
04
90
47
12
00
01
15
47
13
00
00
60
47
14
00
00
40
47
2C
00
00
40
47
11
00
12
00
47
2D
00
01
80
47
2E
00
01
40
56
7A
00
03
10
56
7B
00
01
95
56
7C
00
02
20
56
7D
00
02
00
56
6A
00
08
10
56
4A
00
02
40
56
4B
00
04
20
56
4C
00
00
40
56
4D
00
05
05
55
1
00
09
90
57
5
00
00
40
57
6
00
00
70
57
7
00
01
70
57
10C
00
02
60
57
10B
00
05
40
58
4
00
09
30
58
3B
00
07
60
165
6
00
03
30
165
5
00
05
90
165
1C
00
00
40
165
7
00
00
50
165
4B
00
12
00
165
4A
00
00
40
155
8
00
09
10
155
9
00
08
50
155
10B
00
04
95
155
10C
00
01
90
154
12
00
06
90
157
1
00
02
50
3912
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
157
2
00
04
80
154
13
00
02
10
157
3
00
08
00
153
15
00
11
50
153
16B
00
11
40
141
7A
00
08
30
141
5
00
03
20
141
8A
00
00
40
141
6B
00
10
40
140
1
00
00
40
139
2
00
04
70
139
3C
00
04
95
139
9
00
00
40
139
8
00
09
70
139
7
00
05
00
138
2B
00
00
95
138
2A
00
03
55
138
6A
00
02
30
138
6B
00
02
25
138
8A
00
02
40
138
8B
00
01
60
138
9
00
04
35
137
1A
00
28
20
203
2
00
32
80
232
4
00
27
50
231
2B
00
03
60
231
3A
00
03
50
231
3B
00
03
55
230
1
00
08
90
230
2
00
08
95
230
3A1
00
09
80
230
3A2
00
12
95
230
3B
00
11
80
230
3C
00
15
95
220
1
00
11
65
220
2A
00
03
55
220
2B
00
03
10
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3913
220
3
00
05
25
220
4
00
05
20
220
7
00
14
20
220
8A
00
05
10
220
9A
00
04
90
220
10A
00
04
85
Kadaladi
50. Sikkal
259
5E
00
00
80
260
1
00
15
40
260
2
00
06
15
258
4C
00
09
35
261
00
32
40
248
2
00
00
40
248
5
00
02
60
248
6
00
05
40
248
10
00
05
40
248
8
00
15
40
248
9
00
01
20
247
4
00
04
50
247
3
00
04
50
247
2
00
04
70
247
1
00
05
00
50
1A1
00
02
90
50
1A2
00
09
00
49
2C
00
06
85
49
2D3
00
15
40
49
2D5
00
00
40
49
2D4
00
06
25
49
2D2
00
00
40
51
1A
00
18
00
52
1A
00
17
20
52
1B
00
00
40
Kadaladi
42. Panivasal
300
2
00
26
65
300
7
00
04
00
300
3
00
07
20
300
4
00
10
45
299
6B
00
00
80
294
1
00
12
25
3914
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
294
2
00
00
50
293
5
00
01
70
293
4
00
13
30
295
6A
00
04
20
295
6B
00
14
70
295
5
00
00
40
295
1C
00
11
50
296
3
00
07
20
296
4
00
00
40
296
6
00
03
00
296
5
00
10
50
289
8
00
00
40
289
7
00
03
00
289
1
00
12
00
289
2A
00
00
80
282
10
00
08
30
284
3
00
06
00
284
2
00
06
00
284
1
00
00
40
284
4
00
08
30
284
5
00
02
30
283
8B
00
11
50
283
7
00
01
30
283
6
00
10
80
283
5
00
03
25
331
4
00
01
30
331
2
00
06
70
331
1
00
08
50
272
7
00
03
80
273
1
00
08
20
250
10
00
18
20
247
2E
00
02
20
247
2F
00
04
85
247
2G
00
04
20
247
2H
00
07
60
247
2I
00
00
65
247
2K
00
12
15
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3915
247
2L
00
00
70
Kadaladi
41. Peykkulam
49
2
00
17
70
49
1
00
15
50
48
4A
00
01
30
48
4B
00
04
00
48
3C
00
07
60
50
1A
00
00
40
51
9
00
07
10
51
3C
00
03
30
51
3B
00
01
00
51
3E
00
02
80
51
3D2
00
01
80
51
3D1
00
03
80
51
8A
00
00
70
51
4B
00
12
55
51
4A
00
00
45
51
6A
00
00
40
51
5A
00
13
80
53
2C
00
00
70
53
3A
00
00
40
53
2D
00
15
10
53
2E
00
07
60
57
8
00
07
50
57
9A
00
00
40
57
7A
00
06
10
57
7B
00
07
20
57
3D
00
05
60
57
3C
00
00
40
57
6B2
00
00
40
57
6B1
00
00
80
57
4
00
02
75
57
6A
00
05
90
57
5A
00
04
90
57
5B
00
05
40
70
5A
00
10
80
70
4B
00
03
60
3916
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
70
2
00
11
90
70
3A
00
01
30
70
3B
00
00
40
56
00
00
40
72
1B
00
07
40
72
1A
00
00
60
72
1C
00
11
70
76
14
00
00
40
76
15
00
07
20
76
16
00
00
40
76
5F
00
02
15
76
5E
00
00
75
76
5D
00
00
40
76
3B
00
02
20
76
3A
00
06
75
76
2A2
00
06
80
76
2A1
00
01
85
76
2B2
00
00
40
76
2B1
00
00
55
77
4
00
09
40
77
5
00
02
20
77
7A
00
03
95
83
7C
00
01
35
83
8
00
06
30
83
6E
00
03
50
83
6F
00
05
00
83
6G
00
01
35
84
8A
00
07
40
84
7A
00
04
85
84
1B
00
01
35
84
1A
00
10
75
88
10B
00
02
90
88
10A
00
03
45
88
11A
00
03
85
88
9
00
04
30
88
5
00
03
80
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3917
88
4
00
04
35
88
2C
00
00
40
88
2B
00
00
40
88
2A
00
00
40
88
3A
00
03
65
90
6B4
00
02
35
90
6B3
00
02
10
90
6B2
00
03
50
90
6B1
00
03
05
90
6A
00
00
80
89
7I
00
02
70
89
7E
00
12
00
89
6
00
15
00
89
4B
00
00
50
89
4A
00
02
35
89
5A
00
00
90
93
2C4
00
01
10
93
5B
00
09
00
93
2B4
00
01
40
93
2B3
00
01
40
93
4
00
07
50
93
2B2
00
02
65
93
3A
00
04
90
94
4K
00
00
40
94
4L
00
12
50
94
4M
00
00
55
94
4J
00
15
85
94
4E
00
06
15
94
4B
00
03
60
94
3B
00
00
40
94
2
00
02
05
95
1
00
15
90
[F. No. R-11025(11)/99/2017-OR-I/E-8030]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
3918
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
नई दली, 15 मई, 2018
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 811
811
811
811.—केीय सरकार ने पेोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूिम म उपयोग के अिधकार का अज न)
अिधिनयम,1962 (1962 का 50) (िजसे इसमे इसके पQात उ- अिधिनयम कहा गया है) क( धारा 3 क( उप धारा (1) के अधीन जारी
क( गई, भारत सरकार के पेोिलयम और *ाकृितक गैस मं4ालय क( अिधसूचना का.आ. 2025 तारीख 28.08.2017 िजसका *काशन
भारत के राजप4 सं7या 35, भाग -II, ख;ड 3, उप-ख;ड (ii) तारीख 02.09.2017 म कया गया है । इस अिधसूचना म संलZ अनुसूची म
िविन[द\ ओिड़शा राKय के तहसील : कुकुड़ा
कुकुड़ा
कुकुड़ा
कुकुड़ाखिड
खिड
खिड
खिड, िजला : गंजाम
गंजाम
गंजाम
गंजाम क( भूिम म, ओिड़शा राKय म पारादीप से तेलंगाना राKय म
हैदराबाद तक पेोिलयम उoपाद. के पLरवहन के िलये इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपUरेशन िलिमटेड के )ारा pयािवत कए जा रहे "पारादीप-
हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन पLरयोजना” के संबंध म पाइपलाइन िबछाने के *योजन के िलये उपयोग के अिधकार का अज न करने के िलये अपने
आशय क( घोषणा क( थी;
और उ- राजप4 अिधसूचना क( *ितयाँ जनता को उपलWध करा दी गई थe। और उ- अिधिनयम क( धारा 6 क( उपधारा (1)
के अनुसरण म सYम *ािधकारी न केीय सरकार को अपनी Lरपोट दे दी है;
और केीय सरकार ने उ- Lरपोट पर िवचार करने के पQात और यह समाधान हो जाने पर क उ- भूिम पाइपलाइन
िबछाने के िलये अपेिYत है, उसम उपयोग के अिधकार का अज न करने का िविनq चय कया है;
अत: अब, केीय सरकार उ- अिधिनयम क( धारा 6 क( उपधारा (1) )ारा *द+ शि-य. का *योग करते 0ए एतद्)ारा
घोषणा करती है क इस अिधसूचना से संलZ अनुसूिच म िविन[द\ भूिम म पाइपलाइन िबछाने के उपयोग का अिधकार अOजत कया
जाए; और केीय सरकार उ- अिधिनयम क( धारा 6 क( उपधारा (4) )ारा *द+ शि-य. का *योग करते 0ए, यह िनद`श देती है क
उ- भूिम म उपयोग का अिधकार इस घोषणा के *काशन क( तारीख से केीय सरकार म िनिहत होने के बजाए सभी िबलंगम. से
मु- होकर इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपUरेशन िलिमटेड म िनिहत होगा।
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
तहसील- कुकुड़ाखि;ड
िजला - गंजाम
राKय -ओिड़शा
गाँव का नाम
Eलॉट नं.
Yे4फल
हेhटयर
एयर
वग मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
बलरामपिल
8
00
00
29
11
00
00
10
37
00
01
97
36
00
03
88
44
00
04
07
27
00
00
10
31
00
01
38
53
00
03
12
60
00
01
95
57
00
02
00
58
00
03
67
91
00
02
59
90
00
01
21
92
00
01
62
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3919
95
00
01
13
100
00
02
09
101
00
01
17
106
00
01
12
भुड़rका
68
00
13
41
69
00
24
76
70
00
28
70
71
00
08
30
72
00
09
01
74
00
17
91
75
00
04
55
76
00
00
81
3226
00
00
10
3227
00
04
55
3228
00
03
21
3228/4167
00
03
74
3229
00
07
32
3245
00
00
10
3277
00
07
77
3278
00
13
74
3287
00
00
14
3287/4168
00
00
10
3280
00
07
82
3282
00
00
10
3286
00
02
39
3285/4113
00
00
84
3285/4114
00
01
60
3285
00
02
36
3298
00
00
15
3297
00
00
40
3297/4181
00
01
57
3296
00
05
87
3304
00
00
30
3305
00
02
79
3920
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
3306
00
07
74
3321
00
00
49
3331
00
00
18
3322
00
09
15
3112
00
07
32
3323
00
00
43
3098
00
06
82
3325
00
00
23
3097
00
04
61
3360
00
04
87
3094
00
00
34
3497
00
03
22
3509
00
07
46
3509/4126
00
05
74
3527
00
12
76
3529
00
00
98
3526
00
06
00
3544
00
00
80
3558
00
17
77
3559
00
03
78
3560
00
01
30
3579
00
01
16
3579/4239
00
01
20
3592
00
10
18
3591
00
04
83
3589
00
00
44
3586
00
17
29
बउलझोिल
843
00
00
10
846
00
00
10
917
00
01
52
926
00
02
21
922
00
00
45
925
00
01
46
927
00
01
64
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3921
928
00
02
05
973
00
03
03
974
00
00
10
973/2288
00
02
12
976
00
02
84
977/3152
00
03
41
977
00
00
27
978
00
03
01
978/3194
00
04
86
978/3195
00
04
03
980
00
00
78
1715
00
00
84
982
00
03
00
983
00
03
10
984
00
00
16
985
00
02
53
986
00
02
63
987
00
07
13
990
00
02
64
989
00
00
80
992
00
02
24
993
00
08
29
1000
00
00
11
999
00
06
83
1000/2275
00
00
56
1002
00
02
59
1001
00
02
50
1004
00
03
80
1004/3151
00
00
10
1312/2270
00
00
10
1313
00
06
38
1317
00
00
49
1316
00
06
14
2087
00
07
17
3922
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2088
00
08
26
2089
00
04
97
म0घरािहल
97
00
00
10
110
00
00
82
111
00
08
17
112
00
04
71
122
00
01
42
215
00
01
89
223
00
03
70
209
00
20
64
192
00
15
14
193
00
08
61
पादLरपली
303
00
04
10
325
00
02
18
324
00
03
96
323
00
04
83
309
00
00
64
322
00
06
74
315
00
00
18
321
00
04
30
316
00
00
68
317
00
01
04
319
00
01
20
318
00
04
16
362
00
01
08
383
00
02
08
384
00
00
10
382
00
06
01
380
00
02
64
381
00
00
13
376
00
08
15
386/653
00
01
54
395
00
02
67
390
00
03
43
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3923
391
00
02
52
393
00
03
16
392
00
02
52
394
00
01
43
437
00
05
27
438
00
02
46
439
00
08
99
434
00
09
82
लांिजआ
743
00
01
79
742
00
00
11
744
00
08
44
752
00
01
98
745
00
02
08
750
00
00
95
749
00
03
76
751
00
04
80
757
00
03
11
748
00
00
32
758
00
06
24
769
00
00
80
806
00
01
97
805
00
02
46
804
00
01
02
803
00
00
10
770
00
00
10
802
00
03
88
801
00
03
19
828
00
01
56
828/1730
00
01
49
800
00
03
74
799
00
00
23
829
00
01
31
830
00
02
32
831
00
02
46
3924
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
866
00
04
41
834
00
00
12
865
00
03
60
867
00
02
04
868
00
03
36
864
00
00
47
869
00
00
19
883
00
05
58
871
00
03
03
882
00
00
26
877
00
05
16
879
00
05
24
878
00
04
74
1029
00
01
75
1030
00
02
25
1028
00
00
10
1022
00
02
87
1023
00
00
10
1031
00
00
32
1020
00
00
66
1021
00
00
79
1034
00
01
03
1041
00
02
12
1040
00
02
29
1039
00
01
15
1038
00
04
19
1044
00
00
21
1137
00
03
68
1138
00
00
10
1134
00
03
09
1136
00
01
10
1135
00
01
48
1133
00
01
27
1132
00
05
42
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3925
1126
00
01
87
1131
00
01
28
1130
00
02
40
1129
00
01
86
1128
00
01
69
1207
00
01
63
1209
00
02
44
1206
00
03
10
1211
00
02
64
1212
00
01
39
1213
00
01
60
1214
00
04
07
1215
00
06
80
1216
00
04
60
1224
00
01
78
1225
00
03
42
1223
00
01
82
1369
00
06
80
1369/1436
00
02
09
1370
00
04
27
1351
00
02
59
1349
00
02
68
1344
00
10
60
1322
00
02
59
1323
00
04
31
1324
00
02
22
1325
00
01
79
1326
00
03
22
1327
00
01
15
1328
00
00
55
1318
00
01
31
1313
00
01
20
1314
00
01
15
1308
00
00
95
3926
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1310
00
00
10
1306
00
01
07
1309
00
00
17
1298
00
00
49
1305
00
01
02
1304
00
01
71
1299
00
00
73
1300
00
00
77
1301
00
00
54
1302
00
02
73
1296
00
01
25
1295
00
01
46
1294
00
01
34
1293
00
01
41
भगबानपुर
563
00
04
94
538
00
04
05
539
00
09
28
540
00
01
04
537
00
00
25
519
00
11
03
535/808
00
06
15
572
00
02
53
573
00
05
60
533
00
01
80
574/860
00
03
24
574/859
00
02
82
574/1179
00
01
54
574
00
01
29
576
00
08
40
576/895
00
01
17
577
00
19
81
578
00
02
40
579
00
02
22
579/1185
00
00
94
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3927
580
00
06
20
582
00
05
88
583
00
11
63
586
00
16
32
588
00
03
97
616
00
10
81
615
00
10
31
618
00
11
39
620
00
08
66
649
00
08
91
668
00
02
26
669
00
00
56
662
00
00
53
663
00
01
06
661
00
03
15
372
00
02
40
371
00
05
96
367
00
00
67
297
00
02
21
298
00
06
16
299/791
00
00
60
`
208
00
01
24
209
00
07
76
205
00
00
94
206
00
07
54
207
00
05
58
202
00
05
82
201
00
04
66
201/970
00
00
10
200
00
02
60
692
00
02
61
198
00
01
16
197
00
02
00
196
00
07
35
3928
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
187
00
00
70
728
00
00
28
728/790
00
05
84
727
00
01
24
729
00
12
72
190
00
00
10
730
00
02
20
748
00
08
05
750
00
04
50
751/890
00
05
41
755
00
06
71
756
00
05
43
754/778
00
00
44
756/888
00
05
87
756/887
00
02
70
759/772
00
05
80
760
00
14
00
759
00
05
09
761
00
01
95
762/845
00
06
85
762/846
00
04
36
763
00
00
72
अनताइ
1365
00
03
14
1366
00
04
64
1367
00
02
00
1367/2328
00
05
15
1367/2330
00
05
15
1476
00
04
03
1433
00
08
65
1438
00
03
62
1438/2193
00
02
50
1437
00
01
36
1435/2175
00
00
51
1435
00
00
51
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3929
1449
00
08
06
1450
00
08
96
1458
00
07
25
1456
00
00
37
1457
00
00
50
1455
00
02
75
1453
00
00
58
1454
00
02
90
1466
00
04
61
1591
00
00
17
1590
00
09
45
1599
00
00
10
1589
00
00
10
1606
00
06
08
1584
00
12
45
1583
00
00
10
1582
00
03
63
1610
00
01
42
1579
00
03
46
1580
00
00
55
1580/1796
00
02
13
1578
00
02
22
1613
00
00
56
1577
00
04
56
1576
00
01
69
1575
00
00
77
1544
00
00
10
1545
00
06
54
1546
00
04
11
1547
00
00
10
1548
00
02
17
1571
00
03
90
1571/2187
00
01
55
1560
00
04
02
3930
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1560/2157
00
02
64
1552
00
01
26
1553
00
06
67
1554
00
04
45
1557
00
00
36
1555
00
02
56
781
00
05
32
736
00
00
70
739
00
06
89
740
00
04
08
741
00
01
30
743
00
09
01
744
00
04
08
745
00
02
30
754
00
07
84
बथपिल
1154
00
00
63
1159
00
04
38
1153/2538
00
01
18
1161
00
02
23
1161/3007
00
06
68
1166
00
06
20
1164
00
01
00
1165
00
05
17
1145
00
02
97
1146
00
02
68
1147
00
00
10
1147/2762
00
00
10
1144
00
09
27
1135
00
06
34
1135/1953
00
01
05
1139
00
02
73
1139/2552
00
02
73
1140
00
01
50
1180
00
05
20
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3931
1138
00
00
10
1138/2121
00
00
10
1181
00
01
50
1215
00
01
54
1210
00
01
66
1210/2511
00
00
53
1210/2884
00
00
10
1210/2885
00
02
66
1210/3006
00
03
09
1210/3009
00
03
09
1210/3016
00
02
97
1219
00
01
57
1224
00
07
64
1226
00
00
26
1227
00
00
20
1222
00
04
18
1703
00
08
65
1709
00
00
16
1701
00
00
10
1708
00
05
28
1705
00
00
20
1707
00
06
49
1757
00
03
39
1759
00
01
90
चकु;डाझोला
165
00
13
15
165/399
00
01
03
169
00
21
32
169/424
00
01
53
169/427
00
01
40
169/428
00
01
30
169/429
00
01
53
201/371
00
08
49
201/370
00
13
70
202
00
01
26
3932
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
202/366
00
00
30
202/368
00
02
84
207
00
11
29
211
00
01
71
211/337
00
04
87
209
00
16
86
कुसुिम
8/1124
00
10
79
8/1124/1346
00
09
50
8
00
00
23
105/1125
00
01
49
106
00
00
38
104
00
00
89
104/1295/1612
00
02
70
104/1369
00
01
65
104/1370
00
04
85
104/1653
00
03
59
104/1654
00
01
08
104/1295
00
13
69
1294
00
12
26
1292
00
15
80
86
00
00
10
85
00
05
19
84
00
01
06
80
00
00
70
81
00
01
78
83/1136
00
03
67
82
00
00
88
83
00
03
40
311
00
02
70
310
00
02
29
309
00
02
36
312
00
06
20
308
00
00
92
313
00
00
96
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3933
318
00
15
41
320
00
02
72
326
00
00
10
325
00
10
76
335
00
05
08
328
00
13
80
332
00
01
79
331
00
10
95
330
00
00
13
330/1642
00
00
10
342/966
00
02
21
343
00
15
38
343/1345
00
00
60
343/1371
00
00
85
343/1585
00
00
83
344
00
18
04
292
00
01
84
292/1457
00
02
23
292/1537
00
01
53
292/1547
00
00
76
292/1551
00
00
46
292/1548
00
01
40
292/1549
00
02
75
292/1623
00
01
68
291
00
00
11
291/1077
00
15
47
291/1613
00
00
65
291/1640
00
01
54
430
00
06
12
430/1376
00
03
05
430/1403
00
04
56
431
00
08
41
431/1377
00
02
96
448
00
04
45
3934
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/236/2017-ओआर-I/ई-13717]
पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव
447/1334
00
04
19
1071
00
04
73
446/1332
00
01
72
445
00
03
00
445/1602
00
03
49
445/1604
00
22
27
440
00
02
55
अजु नपुर
11
00
03
76
13
00
00
16
22
00
12
54
90
00
09
94
92
00
00
77
91
00
02
94
85
00
16
33
88
00
00
12
84
00
03
49
83
00
05
88
98
00
09
42
99
00
02
33
126
00
01
58
जुगुिड़
570
00
06
70
580
00
15
75
577
00
10
39
1835
00
16
54
1830
00
09
85
1831
00
01
73
1836
00
00
67
1838
00
15
85
1840
00
00
22
1841
00
06
47
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3935
New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018
S.O. 811.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural
Gas, published in the Gazette of India No. 35 Part-II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii) dated 02.09.2017 vide S.O. Number
2025 dated 28.08.2017 issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals pipelines (Acquisition
of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962),(hereinafter referred to as the said Act) the Central Government
declared its intension to acquire the right of user in the land situated in Tehsil-Kukudakhandi, District-Ganjam in
Odisha State, specified in the schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the
transportation of petroleum products from Paradip in the State of Odisha to Hyderabad in the State of Telengana by the
Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the “Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline Project”.
And whereas the copies of the Gazette were made available to the public. And whereas the Competent
Authority has under Sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, has submitted his report of Central Government;
And whereas, the Central Government after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said
land is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of the user therein;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central
Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the schedule appended to this notification is
hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central
Government hereby directs that the right of user of the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the
Central Government, vests on the date of publication of the declaration, in Indian Oil Corporation Limited, free from
all encumbrances.
SCHEDULE
Tehsil: KUKUDAKHANDI
District : GANJAM
State : ODISHA
Name of the Village
Plot No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
BALARAMPALLI
8
00
00
29
11
00
00
10
37
00
01
97
36
00
03
88
44
00
04
07
27
00
00
10
31
00
01
38
53
00
03
12
60
00
01
95
57
00
02
00
58
00
03
67
91
00
02
59
90
00
01
21
92
00
01
62
95
00
01
13
100
00
02
09
101
00
01
17
106
00
01
12
BHUDUKA
68
00
13
41
3936
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
69
00
24
76
70
00
28
70
71
00
08
30
72
00
09
01
74
00
17
91
75
00
04
55
76
00
00
81
3226
00
00
10
3227
00
04
55
3228
00
03
21
3228/4167
00
03
74
3229
00
07
32
3245
00
00
10
3277
00
07
77
3278
00
13
74
3287
00
00
14
3287/4168
00
00
10
3280
00
07
82
3282
00
00
10
3286
00
02
39
3285/4113
00
00
84
3285/4114
00
01
60
3285
00
02
36
3298
00
00
15
3297
00
00
40
3297/4181
00
01
57
3296
00
05
87
3304
00
00
30
3305
00
02
79
3306
00
07
74
3321
00
00
49
3331
00
00
18
3322
00
09
15
3112
00
07
32
3323
00
00
43
3098
00
06
82
3325
00
00
23
3097
00
04
61
3360
00
04
87
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3937
3094
00
00
34
3497
00
03
22
3509
00
07
46
3509/4126
00
05
74
3527
00
12
76
3529
00
00
98
3526
00
06
00
3544
00
00
80
3558
00
17
77
3559
00
03
78
3560
00
01
30
3579
00
01
16
3579/4239
00
01
20
3592
00
10
18
3591
00
04
83
3589
00
00
44
3586
00
17
29
BAULAJHOLI
843
00
00
10
846
00
00
10
917
00
01
52
926
00
02
21
922
00
00
45
925
00
01
46
927
00
01
64
928
00
02
05
973
00
03
03
974
00
00
10
973/2288
00
02
12
976
00
02
84
977/3152
00
03
41
977
00
00
27
978
00
03
01
978/3194
00
04
86
978/3195
00
04
03
980
00
00
78
1715
00
00
84
982
00
03
00
983
00
03
10
984
00
00
16
3938
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
985
00
02
53
986
00
02
63
987
00
07
13
990
00
02
64
989
00
00
80
992
00
02
24
993
00
08
29
1000
00
00
11
999
00
06
83
1000/2275
00
00
56
1002
00
02
59
1001
00
02
50
1004
00
03
80
1004/3151
00
00
10
1312/2270
00
00
10
1313
00
06
38
1317
00
00
49
1316
00
06
14
2087
00
07
17
2088
00
08
26
2089
00
04
97
MAHUGHARA HILL
97
00
00
10
110
00
00
82
111
00
08
17
112
00
04
71
122
00
01
42
215
00
01
89
223
00
03
70
209
00
20
64
192
00
15
14
193
00
08
61
PADIRIPALLI
303
00
04
10
325
00
02
18
324
00
03
96
323
00
04
83
309
00
00
64
322
00
06
74
315
00
00
18
321
00
04
30
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3939
316
00
00
68
317
00
01
04
319
00
01
20
318
00
04
16
362
00
01
08
383
00
02
08
384
00
00
10
382
00
06
01
380
00
02
64
381
00
00
13
376
00
08
15
386/653
00
01
54
395
00
02
67
390
00
03
43
391
00
02
52
393
00
03
16
392
00
02
52
394
00
01
43
437
00
05
27
438
00
02
46
439
00
08
99
434
00
09
82
LANJIA
743
00
01
79
742
00
00
11
744
00
08
44
752
00
01
98
745
00
02
08
750
00
00
95
749
00
03
76
751
00
04
80
757
00
03
11
748
00
00
32
758
00
06
24
769
00
00
80
806
00
01
97
805
00
02
46
804
00
01
02
803
00
00
10
770
00
00
10
3940
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
802
00
03
88
801
00
03
19
828
00
01
56
828/1730
00
01
49
800
00
03
74
799
00
00
23
829
00
01
31
830
00
02
32
831
00
02
46
866
00
04
41
834
00
00
12
865
00
03
60
867
00
02
04
868
00
03
36
864
00
00
47
869
00
00
19
883
00
05
58
871
00
03
03
882
00
00
26
877
00
05
16
879
00
05
24
878
00
04
74
1029
00
01
75
1030
00
02
25
1028
00
00
10
1022
00
02
87
1023
00
00
10
1031
00
00
32
1020
00
00
66
1021
00
00
79
1034
00
01
03
1041
00
02
12
1040
00
02
29
1039
00
01
15
1038
00
04
19
1044
00
00
21
1137
00
03
68
1138
00
00
10
1134
00
03
09
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3941
1136
00
01
10
1135
00
01
48
1133
00
01
27
1132
00
05
42
1126
00
01
87
1131
00
01
28
1130
00
02
40
1129
00
01
86
1128
00
01
69
1207
00
01
63
1209
00
02
44
1206
00
03
10
1211
00
02
64
1212
00
01
39
1213
00
01
60
1214
00
04
07
1215
00
06
80
1216
00
04
60
1224
00
01
78
1225
00
03
42
1223
00
01
82
1369
00
06
80
1369/1436
00
02
09
1370
00
04
27
1351
00
02
59
1349
00
02
68
1344
00
10
60
1322
00
02
59
1323
00
04
31
1324
00
02
22
1325
00
01
79
1326
00
03
22
1327
00
01
15
1328
00
00
55
1318
00
01
31
1313
00
01
20
1314
00
01
15
1308
00
00
95
1310
00
00
10
3942
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1306
00
01
07
1309
00
00
17
1298
00
00
49
1305
00
01
02
1304
00
01
71
1299
00
00
73
1300
00
00
77
1301
00
00
54
1302
00
02
73
1296
00
01
25
1295
00
01
46
1294
00
01
34
1293
00
01
41
BHAGABANPUR
563
00
04
94
538
00
04
05
539
00
09
28
540
00
01
04
537
00
00
25
519
00
11
03
535/808
00
06
15
572
00
02
53
573
00
05
60
533
00
01
80
574/860
00
03
24
574/859
00
02
82
574/1179
00
01
54
574
00
01
29
576
00
08
40
576/895
00
01
17
577
00
19
81
578
00
02
40
579
00
02
22
579/1185
00
00
94
580
00
06
20
582
00
05
88
583
00
11
63
586
00
16
32
588
00
03
97
616
00
10
81
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3943
615
00
10
31
618
00
11
39
620
00
08
66
649
00
08
91
668
00
02
26
669
00
00
56
662
00
00
53
663
00
01
06
661
00
03
15
372
00
02
40
371
00
05
96
367
00
00
67
297
00
02
21
298
00
06
16
299/791
00
00
60
`
208
00
01
24
209
00
07
76
205
00
00
94
206
00
07
54
207
00
05
58
202
00
05
82
201
00
04
66
201/970
00
00
10
200
00
02
60
692
00
02
61
198
00
01
16
197
00
02
00
196
00
07
35
187
00
00
70
728
00
00
28
728/790
00
05
84
727
00
01
24
729
00
12
72
190
00
00
10
730
00
02
20
748
00
08
05
750
00
04
50
751/890
00
05
41
755
00
06
71
3944
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
756
00
05
43
754/778
00
00
44
756/888
00
05
87
756/887
00
02
70
759/772
00
05
80
760
00
14
00
759
00
05
09
761
00
01
95
762/845
00
06
85
762/846
00
04
36
763
00
00
72
ANANTAYI
1365
00
03
14
1366
00
04
64
1367
00
02
00
1367/2328
00
05
15
1367/2330
00
05
15
1476
00
04
03
1433
00
08
65
1438
00
03
62
1438/2193
00
02
50
1437
00
01
36
1435/2175
00
00
51
1435
00
00
51
1449
00
08
06
1450
00
08
96
1458
00
07
25
1456
00
00
37
1457
00
00
50
1455
00
02
75
1453
00
00
58
1454
00
02
90
1466
00
04
61
1591
00
00
17
1590
00
09
45
1599
00
00
10
1589
00
00
10
1606
00
06
08
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3945
1584
00
12
45
1583
00
00
10
1582
00
03
63
1610
00
01
42
1579
00
03
46
1580
00
00
55
1580/1796
00
02
13
1578
00
02
22
1613
00
00
56
1577
00
04
56
1576
00
01
69
1575
00
00
77
1544
00
00
10
1545
00
06
54
1546
00
04
11
1547
00
00
10
1548
00
02
17
1571
00
03
90
1571/2187
00
01
55
1560
00
04
02
1560/2157
00
02
64
1552
00
01
26
1553
00
06
67
1554
00
04
45
1557
00
00
36
1555
00
02
56
781
00
05
32
736
00
00
70
739
00
06
89
740
00
04
08
741
00
01
30
743
00
09
01
744
00
04
08
745
00
02
30
754
00
07
84
BONTAPALLI
1154
00
00
63
1159
00
04
38
3946
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1153/2538
00
01
18
1161
00
02
23
1161/3007
00
06
68
1166
00
06
20
1164
00
01
00
1165
00
05
17
1145
00
02
97
1146
00
02
68
1147
00
00
10
1147/2762
00
00
10
1144
00
09
27
1135
00
06
34
1135/1953
00
01
05
1139
00
02
73
1139/2552
00
02
73
1140
00
01
50
1180
00
05
20
1138
00
00
10
1138/2121
00
00
10
1181
00
01
50
1215
00
01
54
1210
00
01
66
1210/2511
00
00
53
1210/2884
00
00
10
1210/2885
00
02
66
1210/3006
00
03
09
1210/3009
00
03
09
1210/3016
00
02
97
1219
00
01
57
1224
00
07
64
1226
00
00
26
1227
00
00
20
1222
00
04
18
1703
00
08
65
1709
00
00
16
1701
00
00
10
1708
00
05
28
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3947
1705
00
00
20
1707
00
06
49
1757
00
03
39
1759
00
01
90
CHAKUNDAJHOLA
165
00
13
15
165/399
00
01
03
169
00
21
32
169/424
00
01
53
169/427
00
01
40
169/428
00
01
30
169/429
00
01
53
201/371
00
08
49
201/370
00
13
70
202
00
01
26
202/366
00
00
30
202/368
00
02
84
207
00
11
29
211
00
01
71
211/337
00
04
87
209
00
16
86
KUSUMI
8/1124
00
10
79
8/1124/1346
00
09
50
8
00
00
23
105/1125
00
01
49
106
00
00
38
104
00
00
89
104/1295/1612
00
02
70
104/1369
00
01
65
104/1370
00
04
85
104/1653
00
03
59
104/1654
00
01
08
104/1295
00
13
69
1294
00
12
26
1292
00
15
80
86
00
00
10
85
00
05
19
84
00
01
06
3948
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
80
00
00
70
81
00
01
78
83/1136
00
03
67
82
00
00
88
83
00
03
40
311
00
02
70
310
00
02
29
309
00
02
36
312
00
06
20
308
00
00
92
313
00
00
96
318
00
15
41
320
00
02
72
326
00
00
10
325
00
10
76
335
00
05
08
328
00
13
80
332
00
01
79
331
00
10
95
330
00
00
13
330/1642
00
00
10
342/966
00
02
21
343
00
15
38
343/1345
00
00
60
343/1371
00
00
85
343/1585
00
00
83
344
00
18
04
292
00
01
84
292/1457
00
02
23
292/1537
00
01
53
292/1547
00
00
76
292/1551
00
00
46
292/1548
00
01
40
292/1549
00
02
75
292/1623
00
01
68
291
00
00
11
291/1077
00
15
47
291/1613
00
00
65
291/1640
00
01
54
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3949
[F. No. R-11025(11)/236/2017-OR-I/E-13717]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
430
00
06
12
430/1376
00
03
05
430/1403
00
04
56
431
00
08
41
431/1377
00
02
96
448
00
04
45
447/1334
00
04
19
1071
00
04
73
446/1332
00
01
72
445
00
03
00
445/1602
00
03
49
445/1604
00
22
27
440
00
02
55
ARJUNAPUR
11
00
03
76
13
00
00
16
22
00
12
54
90
00
09
94
92
00
00
77
91
00
02
94
85
00
16
33
88
00
00
12
84
00
03
49
83
00
05
88
98
00
09
42
99
00
02
33
126
00
01
58
JUGUDI
570
00
06
70
580
00
15
75
577
00
10
39
1835
00
16
54
1830
00
09
85
1831
00
01
73
1836
00
00
67
1838
00
15
85
1840
00
00
22
1841
00
06
47
3950
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
नई दली, 15 मई, 2018
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 812
812
812
812. —dsUnzh; ljdkj] isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbZiykbZu ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½
vf/kfu;e] 1962 ¼1962 dk 50½ dk /kkjk 3 dh mi/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk iznRr 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] Hkkjr ds jkti= Hkkx
II] [k.M 3] mi[k.M ¼ii½ rkjh[k 16 Qjojh 2017 es i`"B 8 ij izdkf’kr Hkkjr ljdkj ds isVªksfy;e vkSj izkÑfrd xSl
ea=ky; dh vf/klwpuk la- dk- vk- 493¼v½ rkjh[k 8 Qjojh] 2017 esa fuEufyf[kr la’kks/ku djrh gS] vFkkZr~ %&
mDr vf/klwpuk dh vuqlwph esa %&
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
Rkglhy& MHkk¢bZ ftyk& oMk¢njk
jkT; & XkqTkjkr
ds LFkku ij
i<s+
e©tk@ xzke
lo¢Z uaCkj
e©tk@ xzke
lo¢Z uaCkj
N=ky
221
N=ky
211 ¼250 u;k½
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/104/2017-ओआर-I/ई-8039]
पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018
S.O. 812.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals
pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby makes the
following amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas,
number S. O. 493(E) dated 8th February 2017, published at page 19 in part II, section 3, sub-section (ii) of the Gazette
of India, dated 16th February 2017, namely:-
In the Schedule to the said notification:-
SCHEDULE
Tehsil:- Dabhoi District:- Vadodara State:- Gujarat
For
Read
Mouja/Village
Survey Number
Mouja/Village
Survey Number
Chhatral
221
Chhatral
211 (250 New)
[F. No. R-11025(11)/104/2017-OR-I/E-8039]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
नई दली, 15 मई, 2018
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 813
813
813
813.—कीय सरकार को ऐसा *तीत होता है क लोक िहत म यह आवqयक है क आंu *देश राKय म पेोिलयम
उoपाद. के पLरवहन के िलए पारादीप-हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन पLरयोजना के pयावयन हेतु इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपUरेशन िलिमटेड )ारा
पाइपलाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए;
और क ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन िबछाने के *योजन के िलए यह आवqयक *तीत होता है क ऐसी भूिम म जो इस से
ऊपाबd अनुसूची म वOणत है, और िजसम उ- पाइपलाइन िबछाई जाने का *wताव है, उपयोग के अिधकार का अज न कया जाए;
अतः अब, केीय सरकार,पेोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइस (भूिम म उपयोग के अिधकार का अज न) अिधिनयम 1962
(1962 का 50) क( धारा 3 क( उपधारा (1) )ारा *द+ शि-य. का *योग करते 0ए उस भूिम म उपयोग के अिधकार का अज न करने के
अपने आशय क( घोषणा करती है;
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3951
कोई भी xि-, जो उ- अनुसूची म वOणत भूिम म िहतबd है, उस तारीख से, िजसको इस अिधसूचना म यु- भारत के
राजप4 क( *ितयाँ साधारण जनता को उपलWध करा दी जाती हy, इi(स (21) दन के भीतर, भूिम के नीचे पाइपलाइन िबछाए जाने के
िलए उसम उपयोग के अिधकार के संबध म zी के. ए. एस जेिHसन, सYम *ािधकारी (आंu *देश),इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपUरेशन िलिमटेड
(पाइपलाइन *भाग), पारादीप-हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन पLरयोजना, Eलॉट सं7या 33, कनका दुगा ऑफसस कॉलोनी, गुIनानक नगर मेन
रोड िवजयवाड़ा-520008, आंu *देश राKय को िलिखत Nप से आYेप भेज सकेगा|
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
िजला: कृ{णा
राKय: आu *देश
मंडलका नाम
Cाम का नाम
सव` नcबर
Yे4फल
हेhटेयर
एयर
वग मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
छ4य
बुIगुगूडेम
53/8
00
07
24
ए.क.डूI
माधवरम वेwट
185/1
00
36
34
220
00
50
53
जी.कोडूN
चेवुटूI
52/4C
00
00
01
54/4
00
14
67
72/1B
00
02
75
72/1A
00
06
72
73/2B
00
01
94
73/2A
00
12
61
जी.कोडूN
कोडूN
21/2
00
05
96
21/1B
00
04
48
21/1A
00
25
06
30/1
00
06
32
29/1
00
20
86
29/2
00
00
50
36
00
04
68
35/1
00
00
99
37/4
00
19
77
38/1
00
02
86
43/3
00
16
73
44/3A
00
13
90
3952
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
44/2
00
12
33
44/4B1
00
05
71
44/4A
00
04
78
46
00
00
75
52/2
00
06
78
56/1C
00
05
00
जी.कोडूN
ग|ामनुगु
51/3
00
05
41
52/5
00
28
95
53/2
00
25
45
46/2
00
20
00
जी.कोडूN
मुनगापाडु
148/A2B
00
08
34
जी.कोडूN
लोया
99/2B1
00
11
85
पेनुगंिच*ोलु
पेनुगंिच*ोलु
328/1B
00
23
22
328/1A
00
23
31
वoसवाई
भीमावरम
434/2
00
00
53
25/2D
00
16
07
25/2C
00
04
72
25/1B
00
18
30
ज}ग~यापेटा
बसुपाडू
69/3C/1B
00
07
83
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/252/2017-ओआर-I/ई-21033]
पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018
S.O. 813.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government, that it is necessary in the public interest that for
the transportation of petroleum products in the state of Andhra Pradesha pipeline should be laid for implementing
Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline Project under Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;
And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is
necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which is
described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub Section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and
Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby
declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person, who is interested in the land described in the said schedule, may submit objection in writing to
Shri. K.A.S Jennyson, Competent Authority (Andhra Pradesh), Indian Oil Corporation Limited (Pipelines Division),
Paradip Hyderabad Pipeline Project, Plot No. 33, Kanaka Durga officer’s Colony,Gurunank Nagar Main Road,
Vijayawada -520008 within twenty one (21) days from the date on which the copies of this notification issued under
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3953
Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the general
public.
SCHEDULE
District : Krishna
State : Andhra Pradesh
Name of Mandal
Name of Village
Survey No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Square Metre
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
Chatrai
Burugugudem
53/8
00
07
24
A.Konduru
Madhavaram West
185/1
00
36
34
220
00
50
53
G. Konduru
Chevuturu
52/4C
00
00
01
54/4
00
14
67
72/1B
00
02
75
72/1A
00
06
72
73/2B
00
01
94
73/2A
00
12
61
G. Konduru
Konduru
21/2
00
05
96
21/1B
00
04
48
21/1A
00
25
06
30/1
00
06
32
29/1
00
20
86
29/2
00
00
50
36
00
04
68
35/1
00
00
99
37/4
00
19
77
38/1
00
02
86
43/3
00
16
73
44/3A
00
13
90
44/2
00
12
33
44/4B1
00
05
71
44/4A
00
04
78
46
00
00
75
52/2
00
06
78
56/1C
00
05
00
G. Konduru
Gaddamanugu
51/3
00
05
41
52/5
00
28
95
53/2
00
25
45
46/2
00
20
00
G.Konduru
Munagapadu
148/A2B
00
08
34
G.Konduru
Loya
99/2B1
00
11
85
3954
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Penuganchiprolu
Penuganchiprolu
328/1B
00
23
22
328/1A
00
23
31
Vatsavai
Bhimavaram
434/2
00
00
53
25/2D
00
16
07
25/2C
00
04
72
25/1B
00
18
30
Jaggayyapeta
Balsupadu
69/3C/1b
00
07
83
[F. No. R-11025(11)/252/2017-OR-I/E-21033]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
नई दली, 15 मई, 2018
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 814
814
814
814.— केीय सरकार ने पेोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूिम म उपयोग के अिधकार का अज न) अिधिनयम,
1962 (1962 का 50) (िजसे इसम इसके पQात उ- अिधिनयम कहा गया है) क( धारा 3 उप धारा (1) के अधीन जारी क( गई, भारत
सरकार के पेोिलयम और *ाकृितक गैस मं4ालय क( अिधसूचना का.आ. 2098 तारीख 06.09.2017 िजसका *काशन भारत के
राजप4 सं7या 36, भाग II, ख;ड 3, उप ख;ड (ii) तारीख 09.09.2017 म कया गया है। इस अिधसूचना म संलZ अनुसूची म
िविन[द\ आंu*देश राKय के मंडल : जी.कोडूN िजला: कृ{णा क( भूिम म, ओडीशा राKय म पारादीप से तेलंगाना राKय म हैदराबाद
तक पेोिलयम उoपाद. के पLरवहन के िलए इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपUरेशन िलिमटेड के )ारा pयािवत कए जा रहे “पारादीप-हैदराबाद
पाइपलाइन पLरयोजना” के संबंध म पाइपलाइन िबछाने के *योजन के िलए उपयोग के अिधकार का अज न करने के िलए अपने आशय
क( घोषणा क( थी:
और उ- राजप4 अिधसूचना क( *ितयाँ जनता को उपलWध करा दी गई थe। और उ- अिधिनयम क( धारा 6 क( उपधारा (1)
के अनुसरण म सYम *ािधकारी ने केीय सरकार को अपनी Lरपोट दे दी है।
और केीय सरकार ने उ- Lरपोट पर िवचार करने के पQात और यह समाधान हो जाने पर क उ- भूिम पाइपलाइन
िबछाने के िलए अपेिYत है, उसम उपयोग के अिधकार का अज न करने का िविन{चय कया है:
अतः अब, केीय सरकार उ- अिधिनयम क( धारा 6 क( उपधारा (1) )ारा *द+ शि-य. का *योग करते 0ए एतारा
घोषणा करती है क इस अिधसूचना से संलZ अनुसूिच म िविन[द\ भूिम म पाइपलाइन िबछाने के उपयोग का अिधकार अOजत कया
जाए:
और केीय सरकार उ- अिधिनयम क( धारा 6 क( उपधारा (4) )ारा *द+ शि-य. का *योग करते 0ए, यह िनद`श देती है
क उ- भूिम म उपयोग का अिधकार इस घोषणा के *काशन क( तारीख से केीय सरकार म िनिहत होने के बजाए सभी िबलंगम. से
मु- होकर इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपUरेशन िलिमटेड म िनिहत होगा।
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
िजला: कृ{णा राKय: आu *देश
मंडल का नाम
Cाम का नाम
सव` नcबर
Yे4फल
हेhटेयर
एयर
वग मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
जी.कोडूN
कोडूN
43/6
00
05
37
45/1
00
00
09
47
00
44
02
48/1
00
45
14
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3955
53/1
00
26
06
78/1A
00
21
50
54/1
00
06
62
54/2A
00
14
47
54/2B
00
04
43
54/2C
00
06
68
61/1
00
29
55
61/2
00
00
29
60/4
00
13
04
60/3
00
17
85
60/2
00
02
02
56/4
00
23
71
जी.कोडूN
ग|ामनुगु
40/B 2
00
06
79
40/B 1
00
10
97
40/ A
00
01
07
13
00
30
68
15/1 A
00
02
39
15/1 F
00
14
36
15/1 G
00
00
03
15/1 E
00
03
72
15/1 D
00
03
40
15/1 C
00
04
42
15/1 B
00
04
18
18/1
00
19
40
19
00
40
02
20/3
00
04
07
132/1B
00
17
51
132/2A
00
16
09
132/3C
00
15
15
3956
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
136/A 5B
00
09
25
136/A 4 A
00
11
32
136/A 3 A/2
00
05
08
136/A 3 C/1
00
01
32
136/A 2 C
00
02
90
136/B 1
00
10
95
162/2 A
00
02
95
162/2 B
00
06
92
163/1
00
23
91
162/2 C
00
25
82
153/2C
00
02
47
153/1A3
00
17
05
जी.कोडूN
चेIवु माधवरम
81/3
00
05
41
81/2.B
00
11
23
81/2.A
00
02
63
86/2
00
22
98
169/1
00
29
79
169/2
00
08
84
169/3
00
07
41
172/4
00
19
77
175/2
00
23
69
175/1
00
04
81
175/3
00
00
63
176
00
39
05
जी.कोडूN
कवुलूI
17/1
00
01
46
18/1A
00
08
82
18/2A
00
16
22
18/3A
00
09
39
18/4
00
11
35
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3957
19/2A
00
12
07
19/2B
00
06
67
19/2C
00
08
89
19/2D
00
16
04
50/2A
00
06
23
50/2B
00
10
08
50/3
00
17
09
50/4
00
07
58
51/1A
00
02
56
51/2
00
13
61
51/3
00
15
11
65/1
00
13
51
65/2
00
03
97
63/1
00
08
45
63/4
00
06
22
63/3
00
01
41
63/6
00
03
53
63/9
00
00
05
63/7
00
04
07
63/8
00
17
44
63/19
00
00
06
63/20
00
00
06
64/2B
00
09
76
64/2C
00
12
22
64/3
00
00
76
49/1B
00
00
06
50/1B
00
04
13
50/1A
00
01
50
49/2A
00
00
64
3958
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
44
00
12
44
जी.कोडूN
लोया
95/1B
00
04
65
96/2
00
30
36
99/1B
00
14
10
99/2B3
00
00
42
102/1B
00
09
54
105
00
01
27
124/1
00
10
95
126/13
00
02
91
126/12
00
04
74
126/10
00
08
08
126/9
00
06
76
126/8
00
00
68
126/6
00
01
18
126/7
00
06
60
126/4
00
03
05
126/3
00
05
69
126/2
00
06
20
126/1
00
08
60
127
00
41
71
130/2
00
28
26
130/1
00
17
81
117
00
07
64
114/2
00
11
79
114/1
00
24
34
87/2C3
00
03
25
87/2B
00
05
14
87/2C1
00
02
59
56/2
00
13
46
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3959
57/2
00
20
46
56/1A
00
18
88
55/2
00
07
56
40/2
00
36
24
39
00
19
96
38/1B
00
21
92
10
00
02
35
11/1C1
00
26
90
12
00
06
08
8
00
32
61
16
00
12
15
18/3C
00
14
77
18/3A
00
62
60
जी.कोडूN
सुHमपाडु
13
00
00
88
15
00
46
21
76/1
00
42
36
जी.कोडूN
दुि}गरालापाडु
69
00
40
69
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/252/2017-ओआर-I/ई-21033]
पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018
S.O. 814.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural
Gas, published in the Gazette of India No.36 Part-II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii) dated 09.09.2017 vide S.O. Number
2098 dated 06.09.2017 issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals pipelines (Acquisition
of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) the Central Government
declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land situated in Mandal G.Konduru District Krishna in Andhra
Pradesh State, specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the
transportation of petroleum products from Paradip in the State of Odisha to Hyderabad in the State of Telangana by the
Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the "Paradip–Hyderabad Pipeline Project".
And whereas the copies of the Gazette were made available to the public. And whereas the Competent
Authority has under Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, has submitted his report of Central Government.
And whereas, the Central Government after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said
land is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of the user therein;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central
Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is
hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
3960
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central
Government hereby directs that the right of user of the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the
Central Government, vests on the date of publication of the declaration, in India Oil Corporation Limited, free from all
encumbrances.
SCHEDULE
District : Krishna
State : Andhra Pradesh
Name of Mandal
Name of Village
Survey No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Square
Metre
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
G. Konduru
Konduru
43/6
00
05
37
45/1
00
00
09
47
00
44
02
48/1
00
45
14
53/1
00
26
06
78/1A
00
21
50
54/1
00
06
62
54/2A
00
14
47
54/2B
00
04
43
54/2C
00
06
68
61/1
00
29
55
61/2
00
00
29
60/4
00
13
04
60/3
00
17
85
60/2
00
02
02
56/4
00
23
71
G.Konduru
Gaddamanugu
40/B 2
00
06
79
40/B 1
00
10
97
40/ A
00
01
07
13
00
30
68
15/1 A
00
02
39
15/1 F
00
14
36
15/1 G
00
00
03
15/1 E
00
03
72
15/1 D
00
03
40
15/1 C
00
04
42
15/1 B
00
04
18
18/1
00
19
40
19
00
40
02
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3961
20/3
00
04
07
132/1B
00
17
51
132/2A
00
16
09
132/3C
00
15
15
136/A 5B
00
09
25
136/A 4 A
00
11
32
136/A 3 A/2
00
05
08
136/A 3 C/1
00
01
32
136/A 2 C
00
02
90
136/B 1
00
10
95
162/2 A
00
02
95
162/2 B
00
06
92
163/1
00
23
91
162/2 C
00
25
82
153/2C
00
02
47
153/1A3
00
17
05
G.Konduru
Cheruvu Madhavaram
81/3
00
05
41
81/2.B
00
11
23
81/2.A
00
02
63
86/2
00
22
98
169/1
00
29
79
169/2
00
08
84
169/3
00
07
41
172/4
00
19
77
175/2
00
23
69
175/1
00
04
81
175/3
00
00
63
176
00
39
05
G.Konduru
Kavuluru
17/1
00
01
46
18/1A
00
08
82
18/2A
00
16
22
18/3A
00
09
39
18/4
00
11
35
19/2A
00
12
07
19/2B
00
06
67
19/2C
00
08
89
19/2D
00
16
04
3962
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
50/2A
00
06
23
50/2B
00
10
08
50/3
00
17
09
50/4
00
07
58
51/1A
00
02
56
51/2
00
13
61
51/3
00
15
11
65/1
00
13
51
65/2
00
03
97
63/1
00
08
45
63/4
00
06
22
63/3
00
01
41
63/6
00
03
53
63/9
00
00
05
63/7
00
04
07
63/8
00
17
44
63/19
00
00
06
63/20
00
00
06
64/2B
00
09
76
64/2C
00
12
22
64/3
00
00
76
49/1B
00
00
06
50/1B
00
04
13
50/1A
00
01
50
49/2A
00
00
64
44
00
12
44
G.Konduru
Loya
95/1B
00
04
65
96/2
00
30
36
99/1B
00
14
10
99/2B3
00
00
42
102/1B
00
09
54
105
00
01
27
124/1
00
10
95
126/13
00
02
91
126/12
00
04
74
126/10
00
08
08
126/9
00
06
76
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3963
126/8
00
00
68
126/6
00
01
18
126/7
00
06
60
126/4
00
03
05
126/3
00
05
69
126/2
00
06
20
126/1
00
08
60
127
00
41
71
130/2
00
28
26
130/1
00
17
81
117
00
07
64
114/2
00
11
79
114/1
00
24
34
87/2C3
00
03
25
87/2B
00
05
14
87/2C1
00
02
59
56/2
00
13
46
57/2
00
20
46
56/1A
00
18
88
55/2
00
07
56
40/2
00
36
24
39
00
19
96
38/1B
00
21
92
10
00
02
35
11/1C1
00
26
90
12
00
06
08
8
00
32
61
16
00
12
15
18/3C
00
14
77
18/3A
00
62
60
G. Konduru
Sunnampadu
13
00
00
88
15
00
46
21
76/1
00
42
36
G. Konduru
Duggiralapadu
69
00
40
69
[F. No. R-11025(11)/252/2017-OR-I/E-21033]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
3964
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Je ,oa jkstxkj ea=kky;
ubZ fnYyh] 7 ebZ] 2018
dk-vk- 815-—dsUnz ljdkj] jktHkk"kk (la?k ds 'kkldh; iz;kstuksa ds fy, iz;ksx) fu;e] 1976 (;Fkkla'kksf/r] 1987) ds
fu;e 10 ds mi&fu;e (4) ds vuqlj.k esa] Je vkSj jkstxkj ea=kky; ds iz'kkldh; fu;a=k.kk/khu fuEufyf[kr dk;kZy; dks] ftuds 80
izfr'kr ls vf/d deZpkfj;ksa us fgUnh dk dk;Zlk/kd Kku izkIr dj fy;k gS] ,rr~}kjk vf/lwfpr djrh gS%
01- 'kk[kk dk;kZy;] iBkudksV
02- 'kk[kk dk;kZy;] gksf'k;kjiqj
03- 'kk[kk dk;kZy;] ve`rlj
¹la- bZ&11016@1@2017&jk-Hkk-uh-º
nsosUnz ¯lg] vkfFkZd lykgdkj
MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT
New Delhi, the 7th May, 2018
S.O. 815.—In pursuance of Sub-Rule (4) of Rule of the Official Languages (Use for official purposes of the
Union) Rules, 1976 (as amended, 1987) the Central Government hereby notifies the following office under the
administrative control of the Ministry of Labour & Employment, more than 80% Staff whereof have acquired working
knowledge of Hindi.
01. Branch Office, Pathankot
02. Branch Office, Hoshiyarpur
03. Branch Office, Amritsar
[No. E-11016/1/2017-RBN]
DEVENDER SINGH, Economic Adviser
ubZ fnYyh] 14 ebZ] 2018
dk-vk- 816-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj cSad vkWiQ
jktLFkku fyfeVsM çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; vkS|ksfxd
vfèkdj.k t;iqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 09@98) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 14-05-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&12012@177@96&vkbZvkj (ch&I)º
ch-,l- fc"V] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 14th May, 2018
S.O. 816.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 09/98) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court Jaipur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Bank of Rajasthan Ltd.
and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 14.05.2018.
[No. L-12012/177/96-IR (B-I)]
B.S. BISHT, Section Officer
vuqca/k
vuqca/k
vuqca/k
vuqca/k
dsUnzh; vkS|ksfxd U;k;kf
dsUnzh; vkS|ksfxd U;k;kf
dsUnzh; vkS|ksfxd U;k;kf
dsUnzh; vkS|ksfxd U;k;kf/kdj.k] t;i
/kdj.k] t;i
/kdj.k] t;i
/kdj.k] t;iqjqjqjqj
ihBklhu vf/kdkjh%& fxjh'k dqekj 'kekZ] vkj-,p-ts-,l-
dsl uacj lh
dsl uacj lh
dsl uacj lh
dsl uacj lh-vkbZ
vkbZ
vkbZ
vkbZ-VhVhVhVh- 09@98
09@98
09@98
09@98
lhlhlhlh-vkbZ
vkbZ
vkbZ
vkbZ-,l
,l
,l
,l-
03@14
03@14
03@14
03@14
jSQjSal%
jSQjSal%
jSQjSal%
jSQjSal% dsUnz ljdkj] Je ea=ky;] ubZ fnYyh dk vkns’k dzekad ,y-&12012@177@96 vkbZ-vkj-[ch-] dsUnz ljdkj] fnukad 1-10-97
vukfn dkSf'kd iq= Jh ,y-,l- dkSf'kd fuoklh&13] 'kkyhekj ckx] vtesj jksM] ghjkiqjk] t;iqjA
------------izkFkhZA
izkFkhZA
izkFkhZA
izkFkhZA
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3965
cuke
cuke
cuke
cuke
¼1½ cSad vkWQ jktLFkku OkrZeku eas vkbZ-lh-vkbZ-lh-vkbZ- cSad fy- tfj;s
tujy eSustj pkSew gkml] lh&Ldhe] t;iqjA
¼2½ eSustj] cSad vkWQ jktLFkku] m|ksx Hkou] fryd ekxZ] t;iqjA
---foi{khx.k
foi{khx.k
foi{khx.k
foi{khx.kA
A
A
A
mifLFkr %
mifLFkr %
mifLFkr %
mifLFkr %
izkFkhZ dh vksj ls % fo}ku izfrfuf/k Jh tqxy fd'kksj vxzokyA
vizkFkhZ cSasd dh vksj ls % fo}ku izfrfuf/k Jh #ihu dkyk A
fnukad % 15
fnukad % 15
fnukad % 15
fnukad % 15-11111111-2017
2017
2017
2017
vfvfvfvf/kfu.kZ;
/kfu.kZ;
/kfu.kZ;
/kfu.kZ;
dsUnz ljdkj] Je ea=ky;]ubZfnYYkh ls mijksDr vkns'k ds tfj;s fuEu vuqlwph dk fookn vf/kfu.kZ; gsrq bl vf/kdj.k dks fnuakd 29-
7-98 dks izkIRk gqvk gSA
"Whether the action of the Managment of Bank of Rajasthan Ltd.,Jaipur is justified in terminating the
services of Sh.Anadi Kaushik[Workman] w.e.f.19-7-95[AN,without paying him notice pay and retrenchment
compensation in violatrion of section 25-F of I.D.Act,1947 ? If not,what relief to the workmen is entitled to ? "
izdj.k ntZ jftLVj fd;k tkdj mHk; i{kdkjku dks uksfVl tkjh fd, x,A izkFkhZ Jh vukfn dkSf'kd dh vksj ls fnuakd 26-8-98 dks
LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse is'k dj vfHkdFku fd;k x;k fd deZpkjh dh vizkFkhZ cSad dh m|ksx Hkou 'kk[kk esa izkjfEHkd fu;qfDr fnuakd 22 vxLr 1994
esa iklcqd jkbZVj ds #i esa dh xbZ Fkh rFkk fcuk fdlh O;o/kku ds izkFkhZ Jfed fofHkUu inksa ij 19 tqykbZ 1995 rd yxkrkj dk;Z djrk jgk
rFkk vpkud fnuakd 19-7-95 dks vizkFkhZ cSad ds vf/kdkfj;ksa dks bl ckr dk /;ku vk;k fd izkFkhZ djhc ,d o"kZ dk;Z dj pqdk gS rFkk ,d o"kZ esa
Hkh 240 fnol ls vf/kd dk;Z dj pqdk gS rFkk bl izdkj izkFkhZ dks vizkFkhZ cSad ls LFkk;h #i ls dk;Z djus dk dkuwuh vf/kdkj izkIr gks x;k
rFkk yxkrkj cus jgus dk Hkh vf/kdkj izkIr gks x;k rFkk bl ,d o"kZ dh vof/k dks de djus ds fy, vizkFkhZ cSad us izkFkhZ dh ekg uoacj o
fnlacj 1994 dh mifLFkfr dkVus dh dksf'k'k dh rFkk izkFkhZ dks fnuakd 2-3-95 ds ckn mifLFkfr ugha djus dh ijUrq dsoy gkftjh jftLVj esa
gktjh yxkus vFkok ugha yxkus ls dksbZ QdZ ugha iMrk gS rFkk vizkFkhZ cSad ds eSustj us ;g fy[kdj nsus dk ncko Mkyk fd izkFkhZ ;g fy[kdj
ns nsos fd izkFkhZ mDr vof/k eas dk;Z djus dk dksbZ dke dk nkok ugha djsxk vkSj ,slk ugha djus ds dkj.k izkFkhZ dks fnuakd 20-7-95 ls M;wVh ij
ugha vkus ds vkns'k ns fn;s x;s rFkk bl izdkj izkFkhZ dh lsok,sa fnuakd 20-7-95 ls lekIr dj nh x;hA izkFkhZ us viuh izFke fu;qfDr fnuakd
22 vxLr 1994 ls ysdj fnuakd 19-7-95 rd yxkrkj fcuk fdlh O;o/kku ds viuh lsok,sa vizkFkhZ dks vfiZr dh gSa rFkk vizkFkhZx.k us izkFkhZ dh
lsok,sa lekIr djus ls iwoZ vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e ds lHkh izko/kkuksa dks rkd esa aj[k fn;k rFkk u rks dksbZ ofj"Brk lwph cukbZ vkSj uk gh
dksbZ uksfVl vFkok uksfVl ds ,sot esa uksfVl ds osru dk gh Hkqxrku izkFkhZ dks fd;k x;k rFkk ubZ HkrhZ djus ls iwoZ dksbZ lwpuk Hkh izkFkhZ dks ugha
nh xbZ] tks fd dkuwuh #i ls vfuok;Z FkhA bl izdkj vizkFkhZx.k }kjk izkFkhZ dh lsok lekIr djuk vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk&25 ,Q
/kkjk&25 ,Q
/kkjk&25 ,Q
/kkjk&25 ,Q-
thththth- ,p
,p
,p
,p- ,oa ,u
,oa ,u
,oa ,u
,oa ,u- ds izko/kkuksa ds foijhr gS] tcfd budh ikyuk djuk eSUMsVjh gSA vr% izkFkhZ dh lsokeqfDr dks vuqfpr o voS/k fo'ks"kdj
vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e]1947 dh /kkjk&25 ,Q-th-,p- ,oa ,u- ds izko/kkuksa ds foijhr rFkk bl ,DV ds vUrxZr cus fu;e 77 o 78 ds
izko/kkuksa ds foijhr ?kksf"kr fd;k tkus rFkk izkFkhZ dks fiNys leLr osru o lsok ykHkksa ds lkFk foi{kh laLFkku esa iqu% cgkyh dk ?kksf"kr fd;k
tkus rFkk izkFkhZ dks fiNys osru o lsokykHkksa ij C;kt o okn dk [kpZ Hkh fnyk;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh gS lkFk gh {kfriwfrZ ds #i esa eqvkotk Hkh
fnyk;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh gSA
foi{kh cSad dh vksj ls izkFkhZ ;wfu;u ds LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse dk tokc izLrqr dj vfHkdFku fd;k gS fd cSad vkWQ jktLFkku }kjk ,d
uhfrxr fu.kZ; bl izdkj dk fy;k x;k Fkk fd ,sls fo|kFkhZ tks fd v/;;ujr gSa vkSj tks v/;;ujr jgrs gq, LokoyECkh cuuk pkgrs gSa] mUgsa
cSad esa xzkgdksa dks iklcqd fy[kus gsrq ,sxst fd;k tkos rFkk ,d fo|kFkhZ ek= nks ?kaVs ds fy, ikVZ VkbZe vlkbZuesaV ij j[ks x;s Fks vkSj mUgsa
fyfidh; oxZ dh xzsM dk 1@3 jsequjs'ku ds rkSj ij Hkqxrku fd;k tkrk Fkk rFkk ,sls fo|kFkhZ cSad ds dHkh deZpkjh fu;ksftr ugha fd, x, Fks
vkSj vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 dh /kkjk&2,l- ds rgr ,sls fo|kFkhZ deZdkj dh ifjf/k esa ugha vkrs gSaAizkFkhZ vukfn dkSf'kd dks Hkh
3966
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
va'akdkyhu rkSj ij iklcqd jkbZVj dh gSfl;r ls j[kk x;k Fkk rFkk izkFkhZ us dqy 179 fnu ls vf/kd foi{kh cSad esa va'kdkyhu iklcqd jkbZVj
dh gSfl;r ls dke ugha fd;k gS rFkk izkFkhZ dks izFke ckj fnuakd 22-8-94 ls 21-8-94 rd o fQj fnuakd 6-12-94 ls 2-3-95 rd dh vof/k esa
iklcqd jkbZVj dk dke fn;k x;k Fkk vkSj bl rjg mDr vof/k lekIr gks tkus ds ckn izkFkhZ dk foi{kh ds ;gka dk;Z Lor% lekIr gks x;k rFkk
izkFkhZ dks dHkh fdlh fu;e ;k izfdz;k dks viuk;k tkdj fu;fer #i ls fu;qfDr foi{kh cSad esa iznku ugha dh xbZ Fkh vkSj ,slh fLFkfr esa og
deZdkj dh ifjf/k esa ugha ekuk tk ldrk gS rFkk ,slh esa tks fookn mBk;k x;k gS og vkS|ksfxd fookn dh rkjhQ eas ugha ekuk tk ldrk bl
izdkj izkFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr Dyse ljljhrkSj ij gh [kkfjt fd;s tkus ;ksX; gksuk vfHkdFku djrs gq, fuosnu fd;k gS fd pwafd izkFkhZ vf/kfu;e
dh /kkjk&2,l-ds rgr deZdkj dh ifjf/k esa ugha vkrk gS] blfy, ml ij vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e ds izko/kku ykxw ugha gksrs gSa]blfy, mldk
;g Dyse pyus ;ksX; ugha gS vkSj ;fn izkFkhZ ij vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e ds izko/kku ykxw gksuk ekuk Hkh tkrk gS rks Hkh mldk ekeyk
vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk&2 vks vks ¼chch½ ds rgr vkrk gS vkSj og fdlh izdkj dh jkgr izkIr djus dk vf/kdkjh ugha gSA vUr esa izkFkhZ dh vksj ls
izLRkqr LVsVesV vkWQ Dyse [kkfjt fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh gSaA
eSaus mHk; i{k ds fo}ku izfrfuf/kx.k dh cgl lquh ,oa i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;kA
vc U;k;kf/kdj.k ds le{k vo/kkj.kh; fcUnq ;g gS fd D;k izkFkhZ deZdkj Jh vukfn dkSf'kd dk foi{kh cSad ls iklcqd jkbZVj ds
in ls lsoki;kZolku fnuakd 19-7-95 dks vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk&25,Q-ds izko/kkuksa ds vfrya?ku esa fd;k gS \ ;fn gkW] rks izkFkhZ
deZdkj D;k vuqrks"k ikus dk gdnkj gS \
vc bl laca/k esa loZizFke izkFkhZ deZdkj vukfn dkSf'kd dh lk{; dk ifj'khyu djsa rks mlus eq[; ijh{kk esa crk;k gS fd foi{kh cSad
esa mldh izFke fu;qfDr ikl cqd jkbZVj ds #i esa fnuakd 22-8-1994 dks dh xbZ Fkh rFkk rHkh ls og yxkrkj vizkFkhZ laLFkku esa fnuakd 19-7-1995
rd mlus dk;Z fd;k rFkk izFke fu;qfDr frfFk 22-8-1994 ls mls lsokeqDr fd;k x;k rc rd mlus 240 fnol ls vf/kd vof/k rd foi{kh
laLFkku esa dk;Z fd;k Fkk rFkk tc og 20-7-95 dks M;wVh ij x;k rks mls M;wVh ij ugha fy;k x;k rFkk mDr vof/k esa mlus iklcqd jkbZVj ds
vykok ystj iksfLVax] dEI;wVj vkijsVj dk dk;Z]ch-ih- o vU; yksu dh lIyhesUVjh fy[kus dk rFkk Dyh;fjax dk dk;Z Hkh fd;k Fkk rFkk 240
fnu ls vf/kd dk;Z djus ds dkj.k mls foi{kh cSad esa LFkk;h #i ls dk;Z djus dk vf/kdkj izkIRk gks x;k rFkk foi{kh cSad esa 100 ls vf/kd
Jfedx.k dk;Zjr gSa rFkk foi{kh us mls fcuk uksfVl fn;s lokeqDr fd;k gSAmldh foi{kh cSad dh frydekxZ 'kk[kk esa mifLFkfr ntZ gS rFkk
nLrkost izn'kZ MCY;w-1 ls MCY;w-4 izLrqr fd;s x;s gSaA ftjg esa bl xokg us ;g Lohdkj fd;k gS fd izn'kZ ,e-1 ls tks Hkqxrku nsuk mls crk;k
gS]og mlus izkIRk fd;k Fkk rFkk izn'kZ ,e-2 ls izn'kZ ,e-12ij mlds gLrk{kj gSaA ftjg esa xokg us bl lq>ko ls bUdkj fd;k gS fd vusDLpj ,
mlus feF;k cuk;k gks cfYd mlus fnuakd 22-8-94 ls 2-3-95 rd dk;Z fd;k gSA ftjg esa xokg us ;g Lohdkj fd;k gS fd cSad esa iklcqd jkbZVj
dk dk;Z fd;k]ml le; og fo|kFkhZ Fkk rFkk jktLFkku fo'ofo|ky; eas v/;;ujr Fkk rFkk mlus QqyVkbZe dk;Z fd;k Fkk A ftjg esa xokg us
;g Lohdkj fd;k gS fd mlds ikl cSad dk fyf[kr esa vkns'k fnuakd 3-3-95 ls 19-7-95 rd dk ugha gS] ysfdu mlus cSad eas izcU/kd dh vuqKk
ls dk;Z fd;k Fkk rFkk mls dksbZ cSad dh Ldhe dk ekyqe ugha gSA ftjg esa bl xokg us ;g Lohdkj fd;k gS fd mldh fu;qfDr ds fy, og cSad
ds fdlh lySD'ku cksMZ ds lkeus mifLFkr ugha gqvk rFkk ;g Lohdkj fd;k gS fd mldk uke jkstxkj dk;kZy; }kjk izLrqr fd;k x;k gksA ftjg
esa xokg us bl lq>ko ls bUdkj fd;k gS fd mlus viSDl dEiuh esa fnuakd 22-8-94 ls 21-11-94 vkSj fnuakd 6-12-94 ls 2-3-95 rd gh dke
fd;k gks ]mlus rks fnuakd 22-8-94 ls 19-7-95 rd yxkrkj dke fd;k gS rFkk mlus iklcqd jkbZVj ds vykok vU; dk;Z izcU/kd ds ekSf[kd
vknks'k ls fd;s Fks rFkk og 10 cts ls 7&8cts rd dk;Z djrk Fkk rFkk xokg us bl lq>ko ls bUdkj fd;k gS fd fnuakd 2-3-95 ls og cSad
dk dk;Z NksM pqdk gks rFkk mlds ckn dke djus ugha vk;k gks rFkk xokg us ftjg esa ;g Lohdkj fd;k gS fd fnuakd 20-7-95 ls lsokeqDr djus
ds ckjs esa dksbZ fyf[kr vkns'k ugha fn;k Fkk ekSf[kd vkns'k fn;k FkkA xokg us ftjg esa ;g Lohdkj fd;k gS fd mlds 'kiFki= ds iSjk ua-5 esa tks
mlls twfu;j O;fDr;ksa o u;s Jfedksa dh HkrhZ djus dk tks mYys[k fd;k gS mldh tkudkjh mls ugha gSA vuSDLpj&,-1mlds }kjk cuk;k gqvk gSA
vizkFkhZ lk{kh&1 ujsUnz dqekj tSu us viuh lk{; esa crk;k gS fd foi{kh cSad us ,d uhfrxr fu.kZ; bl izdkj fy;k Fkk tks fo|kFkhZ
v/;;ujr jgrs gq, vkfFkZd lg;ksx gsrq ikVZ VkbZe dk;Z djuk pkgrs gSa]mUgsa cSad ds xzkgdksa dh iklcqd fy[kus gsrq vuqcfU/kr fd;k tkos],sls
fo|kFkhZ ek= nks ?kaVs ds fy, ikVZVkbZe vlkbuesaV ij j[ks tkrs Fks vkSj mUgsa fyfidh; oxZ dk 1@3 jseujsjku ds rkSj ij Hkqxrku fd;k tkrk FkkA
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3967
bl izdkj vuqcaf/kr fd, x, ,sls O;fDr vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 dh /kkjk&2¼,l-½ds rgr deZdkj dh ifjHkk"kk eas ugha vkrs rFkk izkFkhZ
Jh vukfn dkSf'kd izn'kZ ,e-2 ds vk/kkj ij va'kdkyhu rkSj ij iklcqd jkbZVj ds #i eas fu;qDr fd;k x;k Fkk]ftlus dqy feykdj va'kdkyhu
rkSj ij iklcqd jkbZVj dh gSfl;r ls 179fnu dk;Z fd;k gS rFkk Jfed us izFke ckj fnuakd 22-8-94 ls 21-11-94 o mlds i'pkr fnuakd 6-12-94
ls 2-3-95 rd dh vof/k esa dk;Z fd;k Fkk rFkk fnuakd 2-3-95 ds i'pkr mls fu;qfDr ugh nh xbZ Fkh rFkk izkFkhZ dk fnuakd 6-12-94 ls 2-3-95 rd
dk fu;qfDri= izn'kZ ,e-20 gS rFkk fnuakd 20-7-95 rd foi{kh ds ;gka dk;Z ugha fd;k Fkk rFkk fuakd 6-12-94 ls 2-3-95 rd dk izkFkhZ dks Hkqxrku
Hkh fd;k x;k gS rFkk izkFkhZ dh fu;qfDr dh vof/k fnuakd 2-3-95 dks lekIr gks pqdh Fkh rFkk va'kdkyhu deZpkfj;ksa ls lacaf/kr fu;e izn'kZ ,e-13
gSa rFkk izkFkhZ mifLFkfr iaftdk esa Lo;a vius gkFk ls mifLFkfr ntZ djrk Fkk tks izn'kZ ,e-3 ls ,e-6 gS rFkk foi{kh cSad o viSDl dEI;wVj lfoZl
ds e/; MkVk ,UVªh lfoZlst vkWu ykbZu djus dk vuqcU/k gqvk Fkk]ftldk i= izn'kZ ,e-14 gS rFkk izkFkhZ us viSDl dEI;wVj lfoZl dh vksj ls ekpZ
1995 esa dk;Z fd;k]ftlds ckmpj izn'kZ ,e-21 ls ,e-24 gSa rFkk izkFkhZ Jfed }kjk foi{kh cSad esa fd;k x;k dk;Z fooj.k izn'kZ ,e-1 gS rFkk izkFkhZ
us 240 fnu dk;Z ugha fd;k gS rFkk viSDl dEI;wVj lfoZlst ,stsUlh }kjk izsf"kr i= izn'kZ ,e-1 ls ,e-19 gSa rFkk fnuakd 3-3-95 ls 29-7-95 rd
dh vof/k esa dk;Z djus ds fy, izkFkhZ dks dksbZ vkns'k foi{kh cSad }kjk ugha fn;k x;k FkkA ftjg esa bl xokg us bl lq>ko ls bUdkj fd;k gS fd
izn'kZ ,e-20 mifLFkfr jftLVj ds , ls ch o lh ls Mh Hkkx ckn eas fy[kk gks rFkk bl xokg us ftjg esa bl lq>ko ls bUdkj fd;k gS fd izkFkhZ
lqcg 10 cts ls lka; 5 cts rd dke djrk gks rFkk fu;qfDr vkns'k VkbZi ls fy[kk tkrk gks rFkk izn'kZ ,e-20 ls igys Hkh vkns'k fn;s gksaxs rFkk
blls igys vxLr ls uaocj rd dk vkns'k gS]tks i=koyh esa 'kkfey ugha gS rFkk bl fu;qfDr vkns'k eas ;g ugha fy[kk gqvk gS fd fo|kFkhZ gksus
dh otg ls fu;qfDr nh tk jgh gSA ftjg esa bl xokg us crk;k gS fd izkFkhZ deZdkj us fnuakd 2-3-95 ds i'pkr~ visDl dEI;wVj lfoZlst dk
dke pyk ftlesa cSad ds dEI;wVj dk dk;Z fd;k Fkk rFkk ikloMZ dsoy cSad deZpkjh dk Mkyk tkrk gS rFkk xokg us ftjg eas ;g crk;k gS fd
izn'kZ ,e-21 ls ,e-24 ij vukfn dkSf'kd ds gLrk{kj gSaAa
vizkFkhZ lk{kh 2 jkts'k fla?ky us viuh lk{; eas crk;k gS fd viSDl dEI;wVj lfoZlst uke dk laLFkku mldh ifRu ds uke ls gS rFkk
foi{kh cSad ls dksVs'ku Lohd`fr dk i= fnuakd 6-6-95 izn'kZ ,e-18 rFkk vukfn dkSf'kd ds }kjk cSad dk Bsds ds vuqlkj dk;Z lEiknu djus ckcr
i= fnuakd 17-7-95 izn'kZ ,e-17]iphZ izn'kZ ,e-25 gS rFkk vukfn dkSf'kd dEI;wVj lh[kus vDVwcj]1994 ls visDl dEI;wVj lfoZlst esa vk;k Fkk
rFkk vukfn dkSf'kd dks 2000@&#i;s udn fnuakd 19-5-1995 dks o fnuakd 24-6-1995 dks 1500@&#i;s dk pSd fn;k Fkk tks izn'kZ ,e-26 ls
,e-29 gSa rFkk jktLFkku cSad lsok esa Qjojh 95 ls tqykbZ 95 rd vukfn dkSf'kd visDl dEI;wVj lfoZlst ds dk;Z ij Fkk rFkk ftjg esa xokg us
crk;k gS fd viSDl dEI;wVj laLFkk ekg ekpZ&vizsy 1999 eas can gks pqdh Fkh rFkk bl laLFkk esa Vªsfuax nsdj izek.ki= fMIYkksek tkjh fd;s tkrs
gSa rFkk vko';drk vuqlkj Bsds ij Hkh dk;Z ij Hksts tkrs gSaA ikap O;fDr;ksa dks Bsds ij dk;Z ds fy, Hkstk x;k FkkA ftjg esa bl xokg us
Lohdkjk gS fd viSDl dEI;wVj lfoZlst o vukfn dksf'kd ds e/; fyf[kr esa dksbZ le>kSrk Bsds ds lEcU/k eas ugha gqvk Fkk rFkk izn'kZ ,e-12 ls
,e-14 o ,e-26 ls ,e-29 rd vukfn dkSf'kd ds gLrk{kj ugha gSaA
izkFkhZ ds fo}ku izfrfuf/k us fyf[kr cgl izLrqr djrs gq, cgl dh fd izkFkhZ Jfed vukfn dkSf'kd us foi{kh cSad esa fnukad 22-8-94 ls
fnuakd 19-7-95 rd iklcqd jkbZVj dk yxkrkj dk;Z fd;k gS rFkk jktLFkku cSad dk vc vkbZ lh vkbZ lh vkbZ- cSasd esa foy; gks pqdk gS] ftlds
fy, jsQjsUl esa rjehe dh vko';drk ugha gS rFkk izkFkhZ deZdkj us 240 fnu ls vf/kd fnol yxkrkj foi{kh cSad esa iw.kZdkfyd Jfed ds rkSj
ij dk;Z fd;k gS rFkk foi{kh cSad us fnuakd 20-7-95 ls izkFkhZ deZdkj dks dk;Z ij ysus ls ekSf[kd #i ls euk dj fn;k Fkk rFkk izkFkhZ deZdkj dks
u rks ,d ekg dk uksfVl osru fn;k vkSj u gh dksbZ eqvkotk gh fn;k rFkk tc izkFkhZ 240 fnu ls vf/kd fnol dk;Z dj pqdk Fkk rks foi{kh cSad
us /kkjk&25,Q- vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e ds izko/kku dh ikyuk Hkh ugha dh rFkk izkFkhZ deZdkj us o"kZ 2000 esa odkyr dh lun ys yh Fkh
ysfdu odkyr ugha dh Fkh blfy, dksbZ ykHkiw.kZ dk;Z ugha djus ls dksbZ vk; Hkh ugha gqbZ gS blfy, izkFkhZ deZdkj dks iklcqd jkbZVj ds in ij
iqu% LFkkfir fd;k tkosa A izkFkhZ ds fo}ku izfrfuf/k us U;k;kf/kdj.k dk /;ku fuEu U;kf;d fofu'p;ksa dh vksj vkd`"V fd;k gS%&
[1]
State of Punjab Vs. Jagjit Singh- A.I.R.2016 Supreme Court-5176.
[2]
Div. Manager, New India Assurance Co.Ltd. Vs. A. Sankaralingam-2008[6] S.L.R.-638.
[3]
Devinder Singh Vs. Municipal Council, Sanaur 2011 [2] R J T-1195.
3968
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
[4]
Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. Vs. State of U.P.and Others.-[2003] 6 Supreme Court Cases-528.
[5]
Secretary, H. S. E. B. Vs. Suresh-IR-1999 Supreme Court-1160.
[6]
M/s. National Thermal Power Corporation Vs. K. K. Shrivastava and others- 2003[97] FLR-
1065.
[7]
Anand Kishore Vs. Addl.Civil Judge & Ors.-2007[6]- W. L. C.-648.
[8]
Surendra Mehta Vs. Bapu Lal & Anr.-2008[2] W.L.C. [Raj.] 744.
[9]
Union of India Vs. Bhagawan- 2008-I- L.L.J.-925 [Raj].
[10]
0.P. Bhandari Vs.Indian Tourism developoment Corpn. Ltd.- AIR. 1987- Supreme Court-111.
[11]
Metropolitan Transport Corpn. Vs. V. Venkatesan -AIR- 2010 Supreme Court-206.
[12]
S. Seshachalam & Ors. ETC. Vs. Chairman, Bar Council of Tamil Nadu & Ors.-2015[1] WLC
[sc] civil-342.
[13]
Hochtief Gammon Vs.Industrial Tribunal Bhubaneshwar, Orissa and others.-AIR 1964-
Supreme Court-1746.
[14]
Indian Bank Vs.K.Usha and another-1998 [78] Supreme Court -801.
[15]
Bhagwan Dass Chopra Vs.United Bank of India-1987 [55] FLR-909.
[16]
M/s. P. V. K. Distillery Ltd. Vs. Mahendra Ram-AIR-2009- Supreme Court-2205.
[17]
Management of MCD. Vs.Prem Chand Gupta & Anr.-2000[1]-SLR-81.
blds izfrdkj esa foi{kh ds fo}ku izfrfuf/k us cgl dh fd vizkFkhZ cSad esa fo|kfFkZ;ksa dks Lokoyacu cukus ds fy, ,d ;kstuk ds
vUrxZr izkFkhZ dks va'kdkyhu iklcqd jkbZVj ds fy, j[kk x;k Fkk] tks fnuakd 22-8-1994 ls 2-3-1995 rd j[kk x;k Fkk vkSj og Hkh viSDl
dEI;wVj lfoZlst ds ekQZr j[kk x;k Fkk rFkk izkFkhZ va'kdkyhu 2 ?k.Vs dk;Z djrk Fkk rFkk izkFkhZ dh dksbZ fu;kstu p;u gksdj fdlh in ij
fu;qfDr ugha gqbZ Fkh rFkk izkFkhZ deZdkj us 240 fnol dk;Z ugha fd;k Fkk] blfy, vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk&25,Q- ds izko/kku dh
ikyuk dh vko';drk ugha Fkh rFkk o"kZ 2000 ls izkFkhZ odkyr ds is'ks esa gS blfy, odkyr ds is'ks okyk O;fDr deZdkj dh rkjhQ esa ugha vkrk
gS rFkk odkyr ds is'ks esa gksus ls izkFkhZ fdlh fof/kor laLFkk }kjk p;fur ugha gksus ls iqufuZ;qfDr dk ;k fdlh eqvkots dk gdnkj ugha gSA
vizkFkhZ ds fo}ku izfrfuf/k us U;k;kf/kdj.k dk /;ku fuEu U;kf;d fofu'p;ksa dh vksj vkd`"V fd;k gS%&
[1]
District Co-operative Bank Ltd. Jaunpur Vs. Labour Court-2012[135]-FLR-581.
[2]
Bhim Sain Vs.Government of NCT of Delhi-2014[142]-FLR- 79.
[3]
Shriram Institute for Industrial Research Vs. Rajesh Kumar Gandhi-2013[136]FLR-12.
[4]
Peter Ramesh Kumar Vs.Executive Director, Marshalls Power and Communication India [p]
Ltd., Chennai and others.-2007[114] FLR-1167.
[5]
Oshiar Prasad and others Vs. E Smploykers in relation to Management of sudamdih coal
washery of M/s.Bharat coking Coal Limited, Dhanbad, JHARKHAND-2015[4]SCC-71.
[6]
Indian Sulphacid Industries Ltd. Vs. Labour Court Rohtak- 1992-LLR-462.
eSaus mHk; i{k ds fo}ku izfrfuf/kx.k dh cgl ij euu fd;k ,oa mijksDr U;kf;d fofu'p;ksa dk lEekuiwoZd ifj'khyu fd;kA
vc tgka rd vizkFkhZ ds fo}ku izfrfuf/k dk ;g rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ deZdkj dks va'kdkfyd iklcqd jkbZVj ds #i esa visDl dEI;wVj
lfoZlst ds ekQZr j[kk x;k Fkk rFkk izkFkhZ dsoy nks ?kaVs dk;Z djrk FkkA bl rdZ ds laca/k esa mHk; i{k dh lk{; ds foospu eas U;k;kf/kdj.k dk
fouez er ;g gS fd loZizFke rks izkFkhZ deZdkj us viuh lk{; esa crk;k gS fd foi{kh cSad esa iklcqd jkbZfVax]ystj ukbZfVax o cSad ls lacaf/kr
vU; dk;Z izkr% 10 cts ls lka; 5 cts rd djrk Fkk rFkk izkFkhZ deZdkj ls bl fcUnq ij ftjg ls dksbZ foijhr ifjfLFkfr Hkh ugha vk;h gS rFkk
ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; ds U;kf;d fofu'p;&Div. Manager, New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. A. Sankaralingam-
2008[6] S.L.R.-638. esa izfrikfnr fl)kar dh jks'kuh esa fd vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk&2¼,l-½ds rgr deZpkjh dh ifjHkk"kk ls
va'kdkyhu deZdkj vioftZr ugha gksrk gS]blfy, ;fn vizkFkhZ ds fo}ku izfrfuf/k dh ;g nyhy rdZ ds fy, eku Hkh yh tkos rks Hkh va'kdkyhu
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3969
deZdkj Hkh vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk&2¼,l-½ds rgr deZdkj dh rkjhQ esa vkrk gS] blfy, izkFkhZ Jh vukfn dkSf'kd foi{kh cSad esa
deZdkj ugha jgk gks] ,slk ekus tkus dk dksbZ vk/kkj ugha gSaA
vc tgka rd vizkFkhZ ds fo}ku izfrfuf/k dk ;g rdZ gS fd vizkFkhZ dks foi{kh cSad us fnuakd 22-8-94 ls fnuakd 2-3-95 rd iklcqd
jkbZVj ds #i esa j[kk Fkk rFkk izkFkhZ us dsoy 179 fnol dk;Z fd;k Fkk] blfy, 240 fnu ;k 240 fnol ls vf/kd dk;Z ugha fd;k Fkk] bl nyhy
ds lEcU/k esa ;fn mHk; i{k dh lk{; dk foospu djsa] rks izkFkhZ us fnuakd 22-8-94 ls 19-7-95 rd yxkrkj foi{kh cSasd esa dk;Z djuk viuh lk{;
esa crk;k gS rFkk foi{kh dh vksj ls tks mifLFkfr iaftdk izn'kZ ,e-3 ls ,e-6 ,oa izn'kZ ,e-20 izLrqr dh xbZ gSa]buesa izkFkhZ deZdkj dks fnuakd 2-3-
95 ds i'pkr fjyho djuk crk;k x;k gS] tcfd fjyho dk dksbZ fyf[kr esa vkns'k fn;k x;k gks],slk vfHkys[k ij izLrqr ugha fd;k x;k gS rFkk
bl lEcU/kesa izkFkhZ dh vksj ls viuh lk{; esa crk;k x;k gS fd mifLFkfr iaftdk iw.kZ #i ls vizkFkhZ cSad us is'k ugha dh gS rFkk bl laca/k esa ;fn
vizkFkhZ cSad ds lk{kh ujsUnz dqekj tSu dh lk{; dk ifj'khyu djsa rks bl xokg us viuh izfrijh{kk esa ;g Lohdkj fd;k gS fd fnuakd 2-3-95 ds
i'pkr izkFkhZ deZdkj us viSDl dEI;wVj lfoZlst ds ekQZr foi{kh cSad esa dEI;wVj ij dk;Z fd;k gS]bldk rkRi;Z ;g gqvk fd izkFkhZ deZdkj dks
izkjfEHkd rkSj ij rks foi{kh cSad us iklcqd jkbZVj ds in ij dk;Z djus ds fy, fu;qDr fd;k Fkk mlds i'pkr viSDl dEI;wVj lfoZlst ds
ek/;e ls fnuakd 2-3-95 ds i'pkr dk;Z ij izkFkhZ deZdkj foi{kh cSad esa dk;Zjr jgk gS rks foi{kh ds nLrkost izn'kZ ,e-11o ,e-12 esa foi{kh cSad
}kjk izkFkhZ deZdkj dks fnuakd 3-5-95 dks osru ds isVs 700@&#i;s vfxze izkFkhZ dks Hkqxrku fd;k x;k gS vkSj ;g Hkh ;g n'kkZrk gS fd izkFkhZ
ekg ebZ]1995 esa Hkh foi{kh cSad esa dk;Zjr jgk gS rFkk jkT; ljdkj }kjk tks jsQjsUl fn;k x;k gS vkSj mlesa tks lsok i;kZolu frfFk crkbZ xbZ gS]
og Hkh fnuakd 19-7-95 crkbZ xbZ gS] tks foi{kh cSad ds nLrkost ls gh izkFkhZ deZdkj dk fnuakd 19-7-95 rd foi{kh cSad esa dk;Zjr jguk vk;k gS]
tks 240 fnol ls vf/kd dh vof/k rd foi{kh cSad esa izkFkhZ dk dk;Zjr jguk vk;k gS] tks foi{kh cSad ds xokg ujsUnz dqekj tSu dh lk{; ls
Hkh LFkkfir gS vkSj egt viSDl dEI;wVj lfoZlst ds ekQZr ;fn ckn esa foi{kh cSd us izkFkhZ dks dk;Z ij j[kk gS] rks og tc izkFkhZ izkjfEHkd rkSj
ij foi{kh cSad }kjk dk;Zjr jgk gS] rks mlls izkFkhZ dh izkfLFkfr esa rCnhyh gqbZ gks] ,slk ugha ekuk tk ldrk] blfy, izkFkhZ vkSj vizkFkhZ dh lk{;
ds mijksDr foospu ds QyLo#i izkFkhZ deZdkj }kjk 240 fnu ls vf/kd fnol dk;Z foi{kh cSad esa iklcqd jkbZVj ds in ij dk;Z djuk LFkkfir
gS rFkk ;g fufoZokn fLFkfr gS fd foi{kh cSad us izkFkhZ dks ,d ekg dk uksfVl ;k NaVuh eqvkotk ugha fn;k vkSj blfy, vkS|ksfxd fookn
vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk&25,Q-dh ikyuk ugha fd;k tkuk Hkh vfHkys[k ls izdV gSaA
vc tgka rd vizkFkhZ ds fo}ku izfrfuf/k dk ;g rdZ jgk gS fd izkFkhZ deZdkj lu~ 2000 ls odkyr ds is'ks esa gSA bl laca/k eas vizkFkhZ
ds fo}ku izfrfuf/k dh vksj ls U;k;kf/kdj.k dk /;ku fuEu U;kf;d fofu'p;ksa .[1] 2007[114] FLR-1167., [2] 2014[142]-FLR-79.,
[3] 1992-LLR-462. dh vksj vkd`"V fd;k gSA bu U;kf;d fofu'p;ksa dk lEekuiwoZd ifj'khyu fd;k A bu U;kf;d fofu'p;ksa eas tks ekuuh;
U;k;ky; us fl)kar izfrikfnr fd;k gS fd fof/k lgk;d] fof/k lykgdkj deZdkj dh rkjhQ esa ugha vkrk gS] tcfd gLrxr ekeys esa izkFkhZ
deZdkj lu~ 2000 esa odkyr ds is'ks esa vk;k gS rFkk lu~ 1994 eas og odkyr ds is'ks esa ugha Fkk] blfy, ;g mijksDr U;kf;d fofu'p; ds
ekeys ds rF; gLrxr ekeys ds rF; ls fHkUurk ds dkj.k bl izdj.k eas vkd`"V ugha gksrs gSa rFkk U;kf;d fofu'p;&2015[4]SCC-71dk
U;k;kf/kdj.k }kjk lEekuiwoZd ifj'khyu fd;k x;k] bl U;kf;d fofu'p; ds ekeys ds rF; ;g gSa fd deZdkj ds fu;fefrdj.k ,oa ,CtkiZ'ku
dk iz'u vUrxzZLr Fkk] tcfd gLrxr ekeys esa izkFkhZ deZdkj ds fu;fefrdj.k ;k ,CtkiZ'ku dk dksbZ iz'u vUrxzZLr ugha gS rFkk U;kf;d
fofu'p;& 2013[136]FLR-12. ds ekeys ds rF; Hkh gLrxr ekeys ds rF; ls fHkUu gSa] D;ksafd gLRkxr ekeys eas vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e
dh /kkjk&17¼ch-½dk iz'u vUroZfyr ugha gS blfy, gLrxr ekeys ds rF; o ifjfLFkfr ,oa izdze dh fHkUurk ds dkj.k ;s U;kf;d fofu'p; Hkh
vizkFkhZ dks dksbZ enn ugha igqapkrs gSaA
vc tgka rd izkFkhZ deZdkj ds fo}ku izfrfuf/k dk ;g rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ dh voS/k #i ls NaVuh dh xbZ gS] blfy, mls iqu% lsok esa
LFkkfir fd;k tkosA bl rdZ ds laca/k eas tks U;kf;d fofu'p; izkFkhZ ds fo}ku izfrfuf/k dh vksj ls izLrqr fd;s x;s gSa] mudk lEekuiwoZd
ifj'khyu fd;kA vfHkys[k ds ifj'khyu ls ;g Li"V fLFkfr gS fd izkFkhZ deZdkj dk foi{kh cSad esa dksbZ p;fur cksMZ }kjk fof/k vuqlkj p;u ugha
fd;k x;k gS rFkk iklcqd jkbZVj dk in ,d DydZ dk in gksrk gS rFkk DydZ ds in ds fy, fof/k vuqlkj p;u e.My }kjk fu;qfDr dh tkrh
gS rFkk foi{kh cSad ,d yksd midze gS rFkk izkFkhZ dh lsok vof/k Hkh fnuakd 22-8-94 ls 19-7-95 rd jgh gS tks djhc ,d o"kZ dh jgh gS] blfy,
3970
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
izkFkhZ dks lsok esa iquLZFkkiu djus dh ekeys ds rF; o ifjfLFkfr esa dksbZ vkSfpR;rk izrhr ugha gksrh gS] ysfdu izkFkhZ deZdkj dh NaVuh voS/k :i
ls dh xbZ gS] ftlds fy, foi{kh cSad us vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk&25,Q- ds izko/kku dh ikyuk ugha dh gS] blfy, izkFkhZ deZdkj Jh
vukfn dkSf'kd ds dk;Z dh izd`fr dks ns[krs gq, vkSj izkFkhZ }kjk o"kZ 2000 esa odkyr dh lun~ izkIr gksuk vk;k gS] blfy, bu lHkh igyqvksa dks
ns[krs gq, izkFkhZ deZdkj dks crkSj {kfriwfrZ nks yk[k #i;s fnyk;k tkuk ekeys ds rF; o ifjfLFkfr esa mfpr izrhr gksrk gSaA
vr% mijksDr foospu ds QyLo#i bl jsQjsUl dk mRrj fuEu izdkj fn;k tkuk lehphu gS %&
vf/kfu.kZ;
vf/kfu.kZ;
vf/kfu.kZ;
vf/kfu.kZ;
vr % izcU/ku] rRdkyhu cSad vkWQ jktLFkku] t;iqj ds }kjk Jh vukfn dkSf'kd deZdkj dks fnuakd 19-7-95 dks ,d ekg dk uksfVl
osru o NaVuh eqvkotk fn;s cxSj lsok ls i;Zolku fd;k tkuk fof/k lEer ,oa U;k;ksfpr ugha gS rFkk foi{kh cSad }kjk vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e
dh /kkjk&25,Q-ds izko/kku dk vfrya?ku fd;k x;k gS blfy, izkFkhZ deZdkj Jh vukfn dkSf'kd ekeys ds rF; o ifjfLFkfr esa foi{kh cSad ls
crkSj {kfriwfrZ nks yk[k #i;s ikus dk gdnkj gS rFkk ftls foi{kh cSad izkFkhZ dks vokMZ dh frfFk ls N% ekg esa lank; djs rFkk ekeys ds rF; o
ifjfLFkfr esa i{kdkjku [kpkZ viuk& viuk Lo;a ogu djsxsaA
fxjh'k dqekj 'kekZ] U;k;k/kh'k
ubZ fnYyh] 14 ebZ] 2018
dk-vk- 817-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj Hkkjrh; LVsV
cSad çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vfèkdj.k ukxiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 77@2013) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 14-05-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&12012@107@2013&vkbZvkj (ch&I)º
ch-,l- fc"V] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 14th May, 2018
S.O. 817.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 77/2013) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court Nagpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of
India and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 14.05.2018.
[No. L-12012/107/2013-IR (B-I)]
B.S. BISHT, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRI S. S. GARG, PRESIDING OFFICER, CGIT-CUM-LABOUR COURT, NAGPUR
Case No.CGIT/NGP/77/2013
Date: 19.01.2018
Party No.1
:
The Asstt. General Manager(Admn.)
State Bank of India, Region-I,
Administrative Office, S.V. Patel Road,
Post Box no. 37, Nagpur-440 001.
Versus
Party No.2
:
Shri Sudhir S/o. Balachandra Deshpande
B-II, C/o. Anand Dongre, Near Renuka
Mandir, Yashodha Nagar,
Nagpur-440 016.
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3971
AWARD
(Dated: 19th January, 2018)
In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of section 10 of
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) (“the Act” in short), the Central Government has referred the industrial
dispute between the employers, in relation to the management of State Bank of India and their workman, Shri Sudhir
Deshpande, for adjudication, as per letter No.L-12012/107/2013-IR (B-I) dated 22.01.2014, with the following
schedule:-
“Whether the action of the Assistant General Manager (Administration) State Bank of India, Region-I Nagpur
in imposing the penalty of “Dismissal without notice’ on Shri Sudhir Balchandra Deshpande, Special
Assistant, State Bank of India, Deen Dayal Nagar Branch, Nagpur vide their order dated 25.02.2012, is fair
and legal? To what relief the concerned workman is entitled?”
2.
On receipt of the reference, the parties were noticed to file their respective statement of claim and written
statement and accordingly, the workman, Shri Sudhir Deshpande, (‘the workman” in short), filed the statement of claim
and the management of State Bank of India, (“Party No. 1” in short) filed their written statement.
3.
Both parties argued on preliminary issue as regard to validity of departmental/domestic enquiry before
justification of quantum of punishment as referred in reference order.
4.
The workman Shri Sudhir Balachandra Deshpande stated in claim petition that charge sheet was issued by
management against him and departmental enquiry was conducted against him and he was participated in the
departmental enquiry. As per report of Enquiry Officer, both the charges levelled against him were proved and
Disciplinary Authority dismissed the delinquent from service of Bank w.e.f. 25.02.2012. The workman has filed
appeal before the Appellate Authority but Appellate Authority has also dismissed the appeal. In para 11 and 12 of the
claim, the workman stated that he has no dispute on departmental enquiry and he has accepted all charges levelled in
the charge sheet against him. The workman further stated that in the interest of justice present sentence may kindly be
set aside by substituting the punishment of compulsory retirement from the services of the Bank with superannuation
benefits as Bank has not suffered any loss.
5.
In reply party no.1 submitted that the workman has no allegation against the departmental/domestic enquiry in
his written claim petition. Delinquent misappropriated the amount of Bank and refunded the misappropriated amount.
The workman participated in the enquiry and the departmental enquiry was conducted by following the principles of
natural justice. Charges levelled against delinquent was proved and after giving due opportunity to delinquent. The
workman has also filed appeal before the appellate authority as regard to modification of quantum sentence but the
same was also dismissed.
6.
The party no.1 has stated that Tribunal is empowered to judicial review if departmental enquiry is not
conducted accordance to procedure established in service rules and no procedure of natural justice was followed by the
Enquiry officer. Party no.1 further stated that Tribunal is empowered to interfere only when punishment is shocking
disproportionate to the misconducts and proved under section 11-A of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The workman has
already filed the appeal against punishment only and he has not ever challenged the validity of departmental enquiry at
any stage earlier, hence the workman is estopped to raise the validity of departmental proceeding before the Tribunal.
7.
As this is a case of dismissal of the workman from services, after holding a departmental enquiry, the validity
of the departmental enquiry was taken as a preliminary issue for consideration and by order dated 22.01.2016, the
departmental enquiry conducted against the workman was held to be legal, proper and in accordance with the principles
of natural justice.
8.
On behalf of workman it was argued that the punishment was disproportionate even validity of enquiry was
deemed to be correct. He also argued that workman was in acute financial crises at that point of time due to indebtness
and mother’s illness, who was ultimately treated at Bombay Hospital but died due to heart attack. He also argued that
workman still sustained the said plight and survive in life due to two brilliant children and family he had. He also
argued that workman voluntarily accepted and admitted all charges levelled against him but he prayed just and
reasonable punishments like compulsory retirement from the services of the bank with superannuation benefits in place
of dismissal to meet the end of justice.
9.
On the contrary, on behalf of the management it was argued that all charges against the workman was duly
proved and bank imposed punishment of dismissal without notice as per service condition applicable to the workman.
He also argued that judicial review had limited scope for the Tribunal and Tribunal did not act as appellate court. He
relied on the following case laws:-
UPSRTC Vs. Subhas Chandra Sharma 2000SCC (L&S) 349, Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. Vs. N.B. Narawade
[(2005) 3 SCC 134 = (2005) 2 Scale 392], Union of India Vs. Parma Nanda 1989 SCC (L&S) 303, State of
3972
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Orissa Vs. Bidyabhushan Mohapatra (AIR 1963 SC 779= 1963 Supp 1SCR 648), Union Bank of India Vs.
Vishwa Mohan 1998 (4) SCC 310 = 1998 LIC 2514, SBI Vs. Bela Bagchi 2005 SCC (L&S) 940 and Syed
T.A. Vs. Naqshbandi Vs. State of JK 2003 SCC(L&S) 1151= (2003) 9 SCC 592
9.
Now we see the legal position:- Management’s advocate to support his argument put following case laws :--
State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur Vs Nemichand, Civil Appeal No. 5861 of 2007, SC dated 01.03.2011,
Regional Manager, U.P.S.R.T.C. Vs Hotilal, Civil Appeal No. 5984 of 2000 dated 11.02.2003, State Bank of
India Vs Ramesh Dinkar, Civil Appeal No. 2055 of 2003 dated 11.08.2006, Devendra Kumar Vs State of
Uttaranchal, Civil Appeal No. 1155 of 2006 dated 29.07.2013 and Bharat Forge Company Ltd. Vs A.B.
Zodge, A.I.R. 1996 SC 1556, in which following legal principles are laid down:-
i.
It is now well settled that the courts will not act as an appellate court and reassess the evidence led in the
domestic enquiry, nor interfere on the ground that another view is possible on the material on record.
ii.
Therefore, courts will not interfere with findings of fact recorded in departmental enquires, except where
such findings are based on no evidence or where they are clearly perverse. The test to find out perversity
is to see whether a Tribunal acting reasonably could have arrived at such conclusion or finding, on the
material on record. Courts will however interfere with the findings in disciplinary matters, if principles
of natural justice or statutory regulations have been violated or if the order is found to be arbitrary,
capricious, malafide or based on extraneous considerations.
iii.
When a court is considering whether punishment of ‘termination from service’ imposed upon a bank
employee is shockingly excessive or disproportionate to the gravity of the proved misconduct, the loss
of confidence in the employee will be an important and relevant factor.
iv.
That having regard to the gravity of the established misconduct, the punishing authority had the power
and jurisdiction to impose punishment.
v.
Legal position would establish that the disciplinary authority, and on appeal the appellate authority,
being fact-finding authorities have exclusive power to consider the evidence with a view to maintain
discipline. They are invested with the discretion to impose appropriate punishment keeping in view the
magnitude or gravity of the misconduct.
vi
The position in our country, in administrative law, where no fundamental freedoms as aforesaid are
involved, is that the courts/tribunals will only play a secondary role while the primary judgment as to
reasonableness will remain with the executive or administrative authority.
vii.
Court interfered with the punishment only after coming to the conclusion that the punishment was in
outrageous defiance of logic and was shocking.
viii. If the charged employee holds a position of trust where honesty and integrity are inbuilt requirements of
functioning, it would not be proper to deal with the matter leniently. Misconduct in such cases has to be
dealt with iron hands.
ix.
Misrepresentation itself amounts to fraud, and further held fraudulent misrepresentation is called deceit
and consists in lending a man into damage by willfully or recklessly causing him to believe and act on
falsehood.
x.
If the initial action is not in consonance with law, the subsequent conduct of a party cannot sanctify the
same.
10.
Now I will discuss the evidence with reference to the argument of the workman. Workman in statement of
claim para no. 11 & 12 admitted the proceeding of departmental enquiry conducted against him by the bank and he also
admitted the charges levelled against him. He has nothing to object about the findings given by the enquiry officer. He
also admitted that the copy of enquiry report was also received.
On this admission management counsel relied on the following case law:-
Chairman & Managing Director V.S.P. Vs. Gopal Raju Sri Prabhakara Hari Babu (2008) 2 SCC(L&S) 311
and Himachal Pradesh Road Transport Vs. Hukumchand (2009) 2 SCC (L&S) 615 in which it was held that –
1) “Held, detailed enquiry need not be held- Penalty based on respondent’s admission that he unauthorisedly
absented, was valid in view of the Evidence Act, 1872, S.58”. 2) “Employee’s own admission of misconduct-
Enquiry in such an eventuality, held not necessary- Administrative Law – Natural justice”.
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3973
On the perusal of the record it appears that the departmental enquiry was conducted properly and sufficient
opportunity was given to the workman on behalf of the management. In my opinion there was no legal defect in the
departmental enquiry.
11.
As far as quantum of punishment is concerned it is well settled that the disciplinary authority and appellate
authority being the fact finding authority. So this Tribunal is not an appellate authority i.e. Tribunal will only play
secondary roll while the primary judgment as to reasonableness will remain with the executive or administrative
authority. It is also clear from the above case law that jurisdiction of the Tribunal is very limited and its power to
interfere with disciplinary matters is also limited. It is also laid down in the case law that Tribunal cannot set aside a
well reasoned order only on sympathy or sentiments. It is also laid down that the superior court only in some cases
invoke doctrine of proportionality if decision of an employer is found within the legal parameter, the jurisdiction
would ordinarily not be invoked when misconduct stand proved.
12.
In view of the discussion made above and the materials on record, it is found that there is no scope to interfere
with the order of the punishment of dismissal from services passed against the workman. Hence, it is ordered:-
ORDER
The action of the Assistant General Manager (Administration) State Bank of India, Region-I Nagpur in
imposing the penalty of “Dismissal without notice” on Shri Sudhir Balchandra Deshpande, Special Assistant,
State Bank of India, Deen Dayal Nagar Branch, Nagpur vide their order dated 25.02.2012, is fair and legal. The
workman is not entitled to any relief.
S.S. GARG, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 14 ebZ] 2018
dk-vk- 818-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj if'pe jsyos
çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k
vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 527@2004) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 14-05-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&41012@141@2002&vkbZvkj (ch&I)º
ch-,l- fc"V] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 14th May, 2018
S.O. 818.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 527/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Western
Railway and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 14.05.2018.
[No. L-41012/141/2002-IR (B-I)]
B.S. BISHT, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present: Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,
Presiding Officer, CGIT cum Labour Court,
Ahmedabad, Dated 15th March, 2018
Reference: (CGITA) No- 527/2004
1. The General Manager,
Western Railway,
Churchgate, Mumbai – 400001
2. The Divisional Mechanical Engineer,
Western Railway, Diesel Loco Shed, Vatva,
Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380001
3. The Assistant Mechanical Engineer,
Western Railway, Diesel Loco Shed, Vatva,
Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380001
…First Party
V/s
3974
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Shri Kanti Mana,
C/o Shri J.K. Ved,
Sinduri Mata Devasthan, S.T. Nagar Road,
Godhra (Gujarat) - 389001
…Second Party
For the First Party :
Shri H.B. Shah
For the Second Party :
Shri Hitesh D. Kathrotiya
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-41012/141/
2002–IR(B-I) dated 31.12.2002 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in
respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the Assistant Mechanical Engineer (HR), Western Railway, Vatva, in giving
punishment of removal from service w.e.f. 25.08.2001 to Shri Kanti Mana, DSL Khallasi is justified? If not,
what relief the concerned workman is entitled and from which date?”
1. The reference dates back to 31.12.2002. In response to the notice sent to the parties, the second party workman
submitted the statement of claim Ex. 4 alleging that he was serving in the first party at Diesel Loco Shed,
Vatva, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) on the permanent post of Diesel Khallasi in a grade pay of Rs. 740-940/-. He
served the first party for 10 years with unblemished career but he was served with a charge-sheet on
25.10.2000 charging for absence from duty from 12.07.2000 to 25.11.2000. A copy of the charge-sheet has
been enclosed with the statement of claim. He has further alleged that he was absent from duty for the
aforesaid period due to ill health and family circumstances. He also submitted the medical certificate to this
effect but he was not sanctioned medical leave and terminated from service on 25.08.2001 which was wrong
and illegal. Said termination order is also enclosed with the statement of claim. He submitted an appeal against
the termination letter under discipline and appeal rules on 19.11.2001, the said appeal was also rejected. The
rejection letter is also enclosed with the statement of claim. Thereafter, he moved an appeal before the
appellate authority under Rule 25 of Railway Discipline and Appeal Rules on 01.12.2001 enclosed with the
statement of claim. The said review application was also rejected. He has further alleged that he was a
permanent employee and was entitled for all the benefits of labour laws like accidental and sick leave in the
manner like half pay or leave without pay. The first party might have sanctioned his leave as without pay but
instead of sanctioning the leave, his services were terminated. Thus he has prayed for quashing the termination
order and reinstatement with back wages and consequential benefits.
2. The first parties The Divisional Mechanical Engineer, Western Railway, Diesel Loco Shed, Vatva,
Ahmedabad, submitted the joint written statement Ex. 5 submitting that the tribunal has no jurisdiction to
adjudicate the matter on the ground that the second party workman was a railway servant holding a permanent
post, therefore, termination of his service can only be adjudicated by the Central Administrative Tribunal and
the averments made in the statement of claim are not admitted. He further submitted that under the Railway
Establishment Manual, a person who unauthorisedly absent from duty, the major penalty can be imposed. The
second party workman was working in Diesel Loco Shed, Vatva, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in a scale of Rs. 2550-
3000/- and remained absent from 12.07.2000 to 24.11.2000, therefore, a charge-sheet was issued as Form No.
SF5 as per discipline and local rules. He did not submitted sick certificate of a railway doctor during the
period of absence. An enquiry was held on 22.05.2001, 19.06.2001 and 03.07.2001; same was attended by the
second party workman. After enquiry, the charge was found to be proved. The enquiry report was served on
the second party workman on 03.08.2001. The second party workman did not submit any explanation,
therefore, vide order no. AME/VIA-5/NIP No. P/308/00/5/AME/249 dated 25.08.2001; he was removed from
the service. The second party workman moved an appeal against the said order which was rejected after giving
personal hearing. Thus the prayer made by the second party workman in his statement of claim deserved to be
rejected. All the documents mentioned in the written statement are also enclosed.
3. The second party workman in support of statement of claim and reference, submitted his affidavit Ex. 17 on
03.02.2017 reiterating the averments made in the statement of claim but despite giving number of
opportunities to the first party, the first party did not prefer to cross-examine the second party workman on his
affidavit Ex. 17. It is noteworthy that before permitting the second party to submit his affidavit Ex. 17, the first
party vide order dated 28.09.2011, was asked to submit the documents relating departmental enquiry but
despite giving dozens of opportunities, the first party did not submit the record of discretionary proceedings.
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3975
4. The second party has submitted the documents like charge-sheet, punishment order, memorandum of appeal,
rejection order of appeal, memorandum of review on his appeal order, medical certificate of a private doctor
and fitness certificate of the railway doctor.
5. As the first party failed to submit the documents of departmental enquiry, therefore, the reference was
proceeded ex-parte against the first party as none has been responding and appearing from the first party to
explain the reasons of prosecuting the case.
6. Therefore, the second party workman submitted the affidavit Ex. 17 in support of his statement of claim which
is unrebutted.
7. The argument in the written statement that the tribunal has no jurisdiction, is not tenable because the second
party workman was a workman within the definition of Section 2 (s) of the Industrial Dispute Act and his
termination comes within the jurisdiction of this tribunal under Section 2 (c) of the Industrial Dispute Act. The
record reveals that the second party workman submitted a medical certificate issued by a private doctor that he
has been ill from 12.07.2001 to 14.11.2001. The first party has not rebutted this allegation as to why he could
not be sanctioned medical leaves for the aforesaid period, thus the rejection of appeal and also review of it was
unjustified and consequently, the order of termination of his service was unjust and improper.
8. Thus the reference deserves to be allowed. The order of termination of his service is set aside and quashed.
The first party is directed to reinstate the second party workman Kanti Mana with back wages and all
consequential benefits within 60 days from the publication of this award.
9. The award is passed accordingly.
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 15 ebZ] 2018
dk-vk- 819-—dsUnz ljdkj] jktHkk"kk (la?k ds 'kkldh; iz;kstuksa ds fy, iz;ksx) fu;e] 1976 (;Fkkla'kksf/r] 1987) ds
fu;e 10 ds mi&fu;e (4) ds vuqlj.k esa] Je vkSj jkstxkj ea=kky; ds iz'kkldh; fu;a=k.kk/hu fuEufyf[kr dk;kZy; dks] ftuds 80
izfr'kr ls vf/d deZpkfj;ksa us fgUnh dk dk;Zlk/d Kku izkIr dj fy;k gS] ,rn~}kjk vf/lwfpr djrh gS%
01- mi&{ks=kh; dk;kZy;] fr#ouariqje
02- deZpkjh jkT; chek fuxe] 'kk[kk dk;kZy;] jkaph
03- deZpkjh jkT; chek fuxe] 'kk[kk dk;kZy;] jkex<+
04- deZpkjh jkT; chek fuxe] 'kk[kk vLirky] vks[kyk
05- deZpkjh jkT; chek fuxe] 'kk[kk dk;kZy;] eksjh xsV
06- deZpkjh jkT; chek fuxe] 'kk[kk dk;kZy;] fd'kuxat
07- deZpkjh jkT; chek fuxe vLirky] fHkokM+h
¹la- bZ&11016@1@2017&jk-Hkk-uh-º
nsosUnz ¯lg] vkfFkZd lykgdkj
New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018
S.O. 819.—In pursuance of Sub-Rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for official purposes of
the Union) Rules, 1976 (as amended, 1987) the Central Government hereby notifies the following office under the
administrative control of the Ministry of Labour & Employment, more than 80% Staff whereof have acquired working
knowledge of Hindi :
01.
Sub-Regional office, Thiruvananthapuram
02.
ESIC, Branch Office, Ranchi
03.
ESIC, Branch Office, Ramgarh
04.
ESIC Hospital, Okhla
05.
ESIC, Branch Office, Mori Gate
06.
ESIC, Branch Office, Kishanganj
07.
ESIC Hospital, Bhiwadi
[No. E-11016/1/2017-RBN)]
DEVENDER SINGH, Economic Adviser
3976
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ubZ fnYyh] 15 ebZ] 2018
dk-vk- 820-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ bZLVuZ
dksyiQhYM fyfeVsM ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 14@2009) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks
04-05-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&22012@135@2008&vkbZvkj (lh-,e& II)º
jktsUnz ¯lg] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018
S.O. 820.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 14/2009) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court Asansol, as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s E.C.L., and
their workmen, received by the Central Government on 04.05.2018.
[No. L-22012/135/2008-IR (CM-II)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT,
ASANSOL
PRESENT:
Shri Pramod Kumar Mishra, Presiding Officer
REFERENCE NO. 14 OF 2009
PARTIES :
The management of Dhemomain Group of M/s. ECL
V/s
Shri Ranjit Roy
REPRESENTATIVES :
For the Management
:
Shri P. K. Goswami, Learned Advocate
For the Union (Workman) :
Shri S. K. Pandey, Learned Union Representative
INDUSTRY : COAL
STATE : WEST BENGAL
Dated : 19.04.2018
A W A R D
In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-section (1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947), Govt. of India through the Ministry of Labour vide its letter NO. L-22012/
135/2008–IR (CM-II) dated 06.03.2009 has been pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by this
Tribunal.
SCHEDULE
“ Whether the action of the management of M/s. ECL in dismissing Shri Ranjit Roy, w.e.f. 17.10..2005 is legal
and justified? To what relief is the workman entitled?”
————
1. Having received the Order NO. L-22012/135/2008–IR (CM-II) dated 06.03.2009 of the above said reference
from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a Reference Case No.
14 of 2009 was registered on 27.03.2009. Accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue notices
through the registered post to the parties concerned, directing them to appear in the court, on the date fixed
and to file their written statements along with the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support of their
claims. In pursuance of the said order notices by the registered post were sent to the parties concerned. Both
the parties appeared in the Tribunal, through their representative.
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3977
2. Case called out. Shri P. K. Goswami, learned advocate appeared on behalf of the management of Dhemomain
Group of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited and Shri S. K. Pandey, Learned union representative appeared on
behalf of the workman, Shri Ranjit Roy.
3. Shri S. K. Pandey, Learned union representative of the workman, Shri Ranjit Roy files a petition that the
management of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has agreed to re-instate the workman, Shri Ranjit Roy, hence
he is not interested to proceed with the case further and the case may be closed. He also made an endorsement
on the order sheet to that effect. Since the workman does not want to contest the case anymore ‘no dispute’
exists between the parties and I have no option left but to close the case. As such the case is closed and
accordingly a ‘No Dispute Award’ is hereby passed.
O R D E R
Let an “Award” be and the same is passed as per above discussion. Send the copies of the order to the Govt. of
India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for information and needful. The reference is accordingly disposed of.
PRAMOD KUMAR MISHRA, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 15 ebZ] 2018
dk-vk- 821-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ Mcyw-
lh-,y- ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vfèkdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] ukxiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 14@2014) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 10-05-2018 dks
çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&22012@121@2013&vkbZvkj (lh-,e&II)º
jktsUnz ¯lg] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018
S.O. 821.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 14/2014) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Nagpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s W.C.L. and
their workmen, received by the Central Government on 10.05.2018.
[No. L-22012/121/2013-IR (CM-II)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRI J.P.CHAND, PRESIDING OFFICER, CGIT-CUM-LABOUR COURT, NAGPUR
Case No. CGIT/NGP/14/2014-15
Date: 05.12.2017
Party No.1(a)
:
The Sub Area Manager,
Rajur Sub Area of Wani North Area,
WCL, Post: Rajur,
Tehsil: Wani, Distt. Yavatmal,
Yavatmal (M.S.)
Party No.1(b) :
The General Manager,
Wani North Area, Western Coalfields Limited,
Post: Bhalar, Tehsil: Wani,
Distt. Yavatmal (M.S.),
Yavatmal.
Versus
Party No.2
:
The President,
Koyla Shramik Sabha (HMS), Wani North Area,
Ward No. 1, Tilaknagar, At. Wani,
Post: Wani, Distt. Yavatmal (M.S.),
Yavatmal.
3978
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
AWARD
(Dated: 5th December, 2017)
In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of section 10 of
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) (“the Act” in short), the Central Government has referred the industrial
dispute between the employers, in relation to the management of Western Coalfields Limited and their union, Koyla
Shramik Sabha (HMS) for adjudication, as per letter No.L-22012/121/2013- (IR(CM-II) dated 21.07.2014, with the
following schedule:-
“Whether the action of the management of Rajur Sub Area of Wani North Area, Western Coalfields Limited
(WCL), Tehsil. Wani, Distt. Yavatmal(M.S.) of converting Piece Rated Workers to the Time Rated Worker is
legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workmen are entitled to?”
2.
On receipt of the reference, the parties were noticed to file their respective statement of claim and written
statement, by registered post with acknowledge due.
The party No.1 appeared through their advocates on 19.12.2014.
In spite of sufficient service of notice on the petitioner, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. No
statement of claim was also filed on 05.12.2017even after second notice was served for the date of 05.12.2017.
Petitioner did not appear even today. So, case is closed for award.
.It is well settled that whenever a party challenges the legality of an order, the burden lies upon him to prove
the illegality of the order and it is imperative for him to file written statement before the Industrial Court setting out
grounds on which the order is challenged and he must also produce evidence to prove his case. If the party fails to
appear or file written statement or produce evidence, the dispute referred by the Government cannot be answered in
favour of the said party and the party would not be entitled to any relief.
Judging the present case with the touch stone of the settled principles as mentioned above, it is found that the
petitioner has neither appeared nor filed any statement of claim and as such, he is not entitled to any relief. Hence, it is
ordered:-
ORDER
The reference is answered in the negative and against the petitioner. The petitioner is not entitled to any
relief.
SHYAM SUNDER GARG, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 15 ebZ] 2018
dk-vk- 822-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ bZLVuZ
dksyiQhYM fyfeVsM ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 24@1993) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks
10-05-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&22012@49@1993&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º
jktsUnz ¯lg] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018
S.O. 822.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 24/1993) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Asansol, as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s E.C.L.,
and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 10.05.2018.
[No. L-22012/49/1993-IR (CM-II)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3979
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT,
ASANSOL
PRESENT :
Shri Pramod Kumar Mishra, Presiding Officer
REFERENCE NO. 24 OF 1993
PARTIES :
The management of Kalipahari (R) Colliery of M/s. ECL
V/s
Smt. Ch. Kajali Kora
REPRESENTATIVES :
For the management
:
Shri P. K. Das, Learned Advocate
For the union (Workman) :
Shri S. K. Pandey, Learned Union Representative
INDUSTRY: COAL
STATE : WEST BENGAL
Dated : 24.04.2018
A W A R D
In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-section(1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947), Govt. of India through the Ministry of Labour vide its letter NO. L-22012/
49/93–IR(C-II) dated 07.06.1993 has been pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by this
Tribunal.
SCHEDULE
“ Whether the action of the management of Kalipahari (R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Ltd.,
in dismissing Smt. Ch. Kajali Kora, Wagon Loader w.e.f. 28.10.1988 from services vide Charge Sheet No.
AGT/KPH/87/1138 dated 15.07.1987 is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled to? ”
________
1. Having received the Order NO. L-22012/49/93–IR(C-II) dated 07.06.1993 of the above said reference from
the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a Reference Case No. 24 of
1993 was registered on 14.06.1993. Accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through the
registered post to the parties concerned, directing them to appear in the court, on the date fixed and to file their
written statements along with the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In
pursuance of the said order notices by the registered post were sent to the parties concerned. Both the parties
appeared in the Tribunal, through their representative.
2. The workman Smt. Ch. Kajali Kora has filed written statement through union representative. Smt. Ch. Kajali
Kora has alleged in her written statement that she was regular employee working as General Mazdoor at
Ghusick Unit of Kalipahari (R) Colliery under Sripur Area of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited. She was absent
from 11.07.1985. She was charge sheeted on 15.07.1987 after 2 (Two) years. The enquiry has been conducted
without observing any procedure laid down in the standing order applicable to the workman. She was not
given full opportunity to defend herself. The workman being illiterate are not aware about standing order.
Absenteeism in coal industry is general phenomenon. The punishment of dismissal is shocking and excessive.
Dismissal of permanent workman from establishment without proper enquiry is illegal and unfair. The
workman belongs to Scheduled Cast Community. The workman has prayed that she should be re-instated in
service of the company with immediate effect with full back wages from 11.07.1985 till resumption of duty.
3.
The Agent of Kalipahari (R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has filed written statement. He has
alleged that the reference is not maintainable in law as well as on facts. The workman was an employee
Ghusick Unit of Kalipahari (R) Colliery under Sripur Area of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited. The permanent
address has been recorded in Form ‘B’ register. The workman absented herself from 11.07.1985 but when
workman failed to resume his duty Charge Sheet dated 15.07.1987 was issued to her for her absence form duty
without notice and without leave. Notice was issued on the recorded address with A/D. The concerned
workman did not submit any reply to the aforesaid Charge Sheet. The worker was avoiding to submit her
reply. The management decided to hold departmental enquiry and appointed Shri R. Sinha, Senior Personnel
3980
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Officer. The Enquiry Officer sent notice of enquiry on registered postal address to workman but the workman
did not appear. The Enquiry Officer for giving opportunity to the workman adjourned the enquiry proceeding
for 3 (Three) successive dates and again sent registered notice but the concerned workman did not appear in
the enquiry proceeding. The Enquiry Officer had no other alternative, proceeded ex-parte enquiry. The
concerned workman has been guilty of the charge of misconduct as defined under the standing order. The
competent authority accepted the Enquiry Report and was pleased to dismiss the workman on 28.10.1988. The
Agent of Kalipahari (R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has prayed that the workman is not
entitled to any relief.
4.
The Agent of Kalipahari (R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has filed rejoinder written statement.
He has denied all the allegation of the workman Smt. Ch. Kajali Kora.
5.
Workman has filed the following documentary evidences :
(i) Photocopy of the Charge Sheet, (ii) Photocopy of the Enquiry Proceeding, (iii) Photocopy of the statement
of witnesses, (iv) Photocopy of the Postal Receipts, and (v) Photocopy of the Enquiry Report. Workman has
examined Shri S. K. Pandey, union representative as WW-1 but he has not been cross-examined by the
management of Kalipahari (R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited. The management of Kalipahari
(R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has filed the copy of death certificate of Smt. Ch. Kajali Kora
and examined the witness of Shri Gopal Gope.
6. The learned advocate of Kalipahari (R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has filed Death Certificate
of Smt. Ch. Kajali Kora on 17.07.2017, copy has been given to Shri S. K. Pandey, learned union
representative. But he has not filed any objection to this Death Certificate. Though ample opportunity has been
provided to the union representative. Smt. Ch. Kajali Kora has expired on 04.05.1997 though information has
been submitted to the tribunal so late.
7. Since, the workman Smt. Ch. Kajali Kora has expired the reference is abated. Smt. Ch. Kajali Kora (deceased)
is not entitled to any relief.
O R D E R
Let an “Award” be and the same is passed as per above discussion. Send the copies of the order to the Govt. of
India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for information and needful. The reference is accordingly disposed of.
PRAMOD KUMAR MISHRA, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 15 ebZ] 2018
dk-vk- 823-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ bZLVuZ
dksyiQhYM fyfeVsM ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 25@1993) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks
10-05-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&22012@47@1993&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º
jktsUnz ¯lg] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018
S.O. 823.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 25/1993) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Asansol, as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s E.C.L.,
and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 10.05.2018.
[No. L-22012/47/1993-IR (CM-II)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT,
ASANSOL
PRESENT :
Shri Pramod Kumar Mishra, Presiding Officer
REFERENCE NO. 25 OF 1993
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3981
PARTIES :
The management of Kalipahari (R) Colliery of M/s. ECL
V/s
Shri Hopna Majhi
REPRESENTATIVES :
For the management
:
Shri P. K. Das, Learned Advocate
For the union (Workman) :
Shri S. K. Pandey, Learned Union Representative
INDUSTRY: COAL
STATE : WEST BENGAL
Dated : 25.04.2018
A W A R D
In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-section(1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947), Govt. of India through the Ministry of Labour vide its letter NO. L-22012/
47/93–IR(CM-II) dated 07.06.1993 has been pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by this
Tribunal.
SCHEDULE
“ Whether the action of the management of Kalipahari (R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Ltd., in
dismissing Shri Hopna Majhi, M. C. Loader w.e.f. 28.10.1988 from services vide Charge Sheet No.
AGT/KPH/87/1102 dated 11.07.1987 is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled to? ”
________
1. Having received the Order NO. L-22012/47/93–IR(CM-II) dated 07.06.1993 of the above said reference from
the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a Reference Case No. 25 of
1993 was registered on 14.06.1993. Accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through the
registered post to the parties concerned, directing them to appear in the court, on the date fixed and to file their
written statements along with the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In
pursuance of the said order notices by the registered post were sent to the parties concerned. Both the parties
appeared in the Tribunal, through their representative.
2. The workman Shri Hopna Majhi has filed written statement through union representative. Shri Hopna Majhi
has alleged in his written statement that he was regular employee working as General Mazdoor at Ghusick
Unit of Kalipahari (R) Colliery under Sripur Area of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited. He was absent from
19.06.1982. He was charge sheeted on 11.07.1987 after 5 (Five) years. The enquiry has been conducted
without observing any procedure laid down in the standing order applicable to the workman. He was not given
full opportunity to defend himself. The workman being illiterate are not aware about standing order.
Absenteeism in coal industry is general phenomenon. The punishment of dismissal is shocking and excessive.
Dismissal of permanent workman from establishment without proper enquiry is illegal and unfair. The
workman belongs to Scheduled Cast Community. The workman has prayed that he should be re-instated in
service of the company with immediate effect with full back wages from 19.06.1982 till resumption of duty.
3. The Agent of Kalipahari (R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has filed written statement. He has
alleged that the reference is not maintainable in law as well as on facts. The workman was an employee
Ghusick Unit of Kalipahari (R) Colliery under Sripur Area of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited. The permanent
address has been recorded in Form ‘B’ register. The workman absented himself from 19.06.1982 but when
workman failed to resume his duty Charge Sheet dated 11.07.1987 was issued to his for his absence form duty
without notice and without leave. Notice was issued on the recorded address with A/D. The concerned
workman did not submit any reply to the aforesaid Charge Sheet. The worker was avoiding to submit his
reply. The management decided to hold departmental enquiry and appointed Shri R. Sinha, Senior Personnel
Officer. The Enquiry Officer sent notice of enquiry on registered postal address to workman but the workman
did not appear. The Enquiry Officer for giving opportunity to the workman adjourned the enquiry proceeding
for 3 (Three) successive dates and again sent registered notice but the concerned workman did not appear in
the enquiry proceeding. The Enquiry Officer had no other alternative, proceeded ex-parte enquiry. The
concerned workman has been guilty of the charge of misconduct as defined under the standing order. The
competent authority accepted the Enquiry Report and was pleased to dismiss the workman on 28.10.1988. The
Agent of Kalipahari (R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has prayed that the workman is not
entitled to any relief.
3982
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
4. The Agent of Kalipahari (R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has filed rejoinder written statement.
He has denied all the allegation of the workman Shri Hopna Majhi.
5. Workman has filed the following documentary evidences :
(i) Photocopy of the Charge Sheet, (ii) Photocopy of the Enquiry Proceeding, (iii) Photocopy of the statement
of witnesses, (iv) Photocopy of the Postal Receipts, and (v) Photocopy of the Enquiry Report. The workman
has examined Shri S. K. Pandey, union representative as ww-1 but he has not been cross-examined by the
management of Kalipahari (R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited. The management of Kalipahari
(R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has filed the copy of death certificate of Shri Hopna Majhi and
examined the witness of Shri Brahmanandan Jha.
6. The learned advocate of Kalipahari (R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has filed Death Certificate
of Shri Hopna Majhi, copy has been given to Shri S. K. Pandey, learned union representative. But he has not
filed any objection to this Death Certificate. Though ample opportunity has been provided to the union
representative. Shri Hopna Majhi has expired on 20.04.2002 though information has been submitted to the
tribunal so late.
7. Since, the workman Shri Hopna Majhi has expired the reference is abated. Shri Hopna Majhi (deceased) is not
entitled to any relief.
O R D E R
Let an “Award” be and the same is passed as per above discussion. Send the copies of the order to the Govt. of
India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for information and needful. The reference is accordingly disposed of.
PRAMOD KUMAR MISHRA, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 15 ebZ] 2018
dk-vk- 824-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ Mcyw-
lh-,y- ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vfèkdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] ukxiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 47@2015) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 10-05-2018 dks
çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&22012@110@2015&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º
jktsUnz ¯lg] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018
S.O. 824.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 47/2015) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Nagpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. W.C.L.,
and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 10.05.2018.
[No. L-22012/110/2015-IR (CM-II)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRI SHYAM SUNDER GARG, PRESIDING OFFICER, CGIT-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
NAGPUR
Case No.CGIT/NGP/47/2015-16
Date: 10.01.2018
Party No.1
:
The General Manager,
Wani North Area, WCL,
Post: Bhalar, Tehsil: Wani,
Distt. Yavatmal (M.S.) – 445304.
Versus
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3983
Party No.2
:
The Working President,
Koyla Shramik Sabha (HMS),
Ward No. 1, Tilaknagar, Wani,
Tehsil: Wani, Distt. Yavatmal,
Yavatmal (M.S.) 445304
AWARD
(Dated: 10th January, 2018)
In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of section 10 of
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) (“the Act” in short), the Central Government has referred the industrial
dispute between the employers, in relation to the management of Western Coalfields Limited and their union, Koyla
Shramik Sabha (HMS), for adjudication, as per letter No.L-22012/110/2015-IR(CM-II) dated 20.01.2016, with the
following schedule:-
“Whether the demands raised by Shri Sukhranjan Nikunj Biswas, applicant for correction in date of birth on
the bass of School Certificate or sending his case to Medical Board for determination of his age and the
demands supported by the Working President, Koyla Shramik Sabha (HMS), at Wani, Yavatmal is just, fair &
legal? If yes, to what relief the concerned workman is entitled?”?”
2.
On receipt of the reference, the parties were noticed to file their respective statement of claim and written
statement, by registered post with acknowledge due. On 16.03.2016, advocate for the workman and management, both
were present and filed vakalatnama but petitioner did not file statement of claim. Even fresh notice was issued fixing
the case on 06.12.2017, but nobody was present on behalf of the workman even the workman was not present nor he
filed statement of claim. Thereafter case was adjourned to 10.101.2018 but today also, nobody was present nor filed
statement of claim on behalf of the petitioner. It shows that, workman is not interested to continue this case.
It is well settled that whenever a party challenges the legality of an order, the burden lies upon him to prove
the illegality of the order and it is imperative for him to file written statement before the Industrial Court setting out
grounds on which the order is challenged and he must also produce evidence to prove his case. If the party fails to
appear or file written statement or produce evidence, the dispute referred by the Government cannot be answered in
favour of the said party and the party would not be entitled to any relief.
Judging the present case with the touch stone of the settled principles as mentioned above, it is found that the
petitioner has neither appeared nor filed any statement of claim and as such, he is not entitled to any relief. Hence, it is
ordered:-
ORDER
The reference is answered in the negative and against the workman. The workman is not entitled to any
relief.
SHYAM SUNDER GARG, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 15 ebZ] 2018
dk-vk- 825-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ Mcyw-
lh-,y- ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vfèkdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] ukxiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 35@2012) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 10-05-2018 dks
çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&22012@230@2012&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º
jktsUnz ¯lg] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018
S.O. 825.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 35/2012) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Nagpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. W.C.L.,
and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 10.05.2018.
[No. L-22012/230/2012-IR (CM-II)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer
3984
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRI S.S. GARG, PRESIDING OFFICER, CGIT-CUM-LABOURT COURT, NAGPUR
Case No.CGIT/NGP/35/2012
Date: 11.01.2018.
Party No.1
:
The Sub Area Manager,
Durgapur O/C Mines Sub Area of
Chandrapur Area, WCL, Post: Durgapur,
Distt. Chandrapur (M.S.).
Versus
Party No.2
:
The General Secretary, RCMC,
C/o Shri C.R. Terbhre, Near Ayyappa Mandir,
Tukum Ward No. 2,
Tukum, Chandrapur,
Chandrapur (M.S.)
AWARD
(Dated: 11th January, 2018)
In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of section 10 of
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) (“the Act” in short), the Central Government has referred the industrial
dispute between the employers, in relation to the management of Western Coalfields Limited and their union The
General Secretary, RCMC for adjudication, as per letter No.L-22012/230/2012-IR (CM-II) dated 16.01.2013, with the
following schedule:-
“Whether the action of Magmt. Of Durgapur Open Cast Mines sub Area of Chandrapur Area of
Western coalfields Ltd. of dismissal in respect of Shri Pocham Rajam Pairkawar is leal and justified? If not, to
what relief is the workman entitled to?”
On behalf of the workman, union representative, Mr. Dubey is present.
On behalf of the management, Advocate, A.S. Mehadia is present.
Hon’ble High Court in Writ Petition No. 6232/2014 passed an order dated 24.06.2016 in favour of the
management ad Hon’ble High Court quashed this reference. So, this case is not maintainable and parties are directed
that, this reference is dismissed as per direction of the Hon’ble High Court.
Inform the Ministry for necessary action and file is closed and registered with result in concerned register.
S. S. GARG, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 15 ebZ] 2018
dk-vk- 826-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ ,e-
lh-,y- ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vfèkdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] Hkqous'oj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 38@2011) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 08-05-2018
dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&22012@111@2011&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º
jktsUnz ¯lg] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018
S.O. 826.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 38/2011) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Bhubaneswar as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s
M.C.L., and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 08.05.2018.
[No. L-22012/111/2011-IR (CM-II)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3985
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT BHUBANESWAR
PRESENT:
Shri B.C. Rath, Presiding Officer,
C.G.I.T.-cum-Labour Court, Bhubaneswar.
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 38/2011
L-22012/111/2011 -IR(CM-II), dated 02.08.2011
Date of Passing Order – 11th April, 2018
BETWEEN:
1. The Chief General Manager,
Bharatpur Area of MCL
At-Mahendrapur, Bharatpur Colliery,
Angul, Odisha.
2. The Chief General Manager,
Hingula Area of MCL,
At-Mahendrapur, Bharatpur Colliery,
Angul, Odisha
…1st Party-Managements.
AND
The General Secretary,
Talcher Coal Mines Employees Union,
At-Qr. No. IB-103, PO-South Balanda,
Angul, Odisha.
…2nd Party-Union.
APPEARANCES:
None
…
For the 1st Party-Managements
None
…
For the 2nd Party-Union
ORDER
Authorized representative of the Management is present. No-one appears on behalf of the 2nd party-Union on
repeated calls. It is found from the record that despite notice to the 2nd party-Union by Regd. Post it fails to take any
step. It is pertinent to mention here that an exparte award passed on 11.12.2014 has been set aside by this tribunal vide
its order dated 23.12.2016. After such setting aside the exparte award the 2nd party-Union was noticed to make his
appearance and to contest the reference. As no one appears on behalf of the Union and as no evidence is led by the
Union in support of the pleadings advanced in the statement of claim, I am inclined to return the reference without its
adjudication due to the absence of evidence from the side of the Union.
Dictated and corrected by me.
B.C. RATH, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 15 ebZ] 2018
dk-vk- 827-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ Mcyw-
lh-,y- ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vfèkdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] ukxiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 109@2002) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 10-05-2018
dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&22012@196@2000&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º
jktsUnz ¯lg] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
3986
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018
S.O. 827.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 109/2002) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Nagpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s W.C.L., and
their workmen, received by the Central Government on 10.05.2018.
[No. L-22012/196/2000-IR (CM-II)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRI S.S GARG, PRESIDING OFFICER, CGIT-CUM-LABOUR COURT, NAGPUR
Case No.CGIT/NGP/109/2002
Date: 27.03.2018.
Party No.1 : The Sub Area Manager
Hindustan Lalpeth Open Cast Sub Area of WCL,
Post- Lalpeth, Chandrapur (MS).
V/s.
Party No.2 : The General Secretary,
Koyla Shramik Sabha (HMS),
C/o. C.J. Khandre, Near Mahakali Mandir, Chandrapur (MS)
ORDER
In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of section 10 of
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) (“the Act” in short), the Central Government has referred the industrial
dispute for adjudication between the management of Western Coalfields Limited and the General Secretary, Koyla
Shramik Sabha (HMS) vide letter No.L-22012/196/2000-IR(CM-II) dated 19.10.2010, on the following schedule:-
“Whether the action of the management of Hindustan Lalpeth Open Cast of WCL, Post Lalpeth, Distt.
Chandrapur innot protecting wages of Shri Ramayan Sukhalu and Shri Gouri Shankar Bhaddu, Dumper
operators, Hindustan Lalpeth Open Cast of WCL is Legal, proper and justified? If not, to what relief the
workmen are entitled to?”
2.
On receipt of this reference statement of claim and rejoinder filed by the petitioner and written statement filed
by the party no.1.
On behalf of the petitioner evidence is produced. The statement of Mr. Gauri Shankar, Chandrakant Khandre
was recorded on behalf of the petitioner. But on behalf of the party no.1 evidence on affidavit of Mr. K. Raja
Prabhakaran was filed. On behalf of petitioner LRs of Gaurishankar and Ramayan Sukalu filed two applications for
withdrawal of this reference. Mr Gaurishankar Bhaddu was dead and his LRs are recorded in statement of claim. On
this application heard both the parties. On behalf of management no objection was filed. Petitioner Mr. Ramayan
Sukalu and LRs of Mr. Gaurishankar Bhaddu was identified by Mr. Rakesh Shinde, Tripman of Chandrapur Area.
Now application is accepted and permission of withdrawal is allowed.
Hence, it is ordered:-
ORDER
The application for withdrawal of the case is allowed. The case is treated as withdrawn. The
application filed by the Party No. 2 for withdrawal of the case is made part of the order. The reference is
answered in the negative and against the petitioner. The petitioner is not entitled to any relief.
S.S. GARG, Presiding Officer
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3987
ubZ fnYyh] 18 ebZ] 2018
dk-vk- 828-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eS-
vksjhfVdks fy- ,oa vU; cSadksa ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa
dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] Hkqous'oj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 01@2006) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh;
ljdkj dks 18-05-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&12011@81@2005&vkbZvkj (ch&II)º
jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 18th May, 2018
S.O. 828.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 01/2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Bhubaneswar as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s
ORITCO Ltd. & other Banks, and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 18.05.2018.
[No. L-12011/81/2005-IR (B-II)]
RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT BHUBANESWAR
PRESENT:
Shri B.C. Rath, Presiding Officer,
C.G.I.T.-cum-Labour Court, Bhubaneswar.
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 01/2006
Date of Passing Award – 16th April, 2018
BETWEEN:
1. The Chairman-cum-M.D.,
Industrial Development Bank of India, IDBI Tower,
WTC Complex, Cuffe Parade, Mumbai-400 005.
2. The Chief Executive, ORITCO Ltd.,
A/130, Sahid Nagar, Bhubaneswar, Orissa.
3(a)The ICICI Ltd., Mumbai.
3(b)The CMD, IFCI, New Delhi.
3(c)The MD, IPIOL, Bhubaneswar.
3(d)The MD, OSICL, Cuttack.
3(e)The MD, OSFCL, Cuttack.
3(f)The Secretary, Industries Deptt.,
Govt. of Orissa, Bhubaneswar.
3(g)The CGM, SBI, Bhubaneswar.
3(h)The AGM, Bank of India, Mumbai
3(i)The CMD, UCO Bank, Kolkatta.
3(j)The Chairman, Andhra Bank, Hyderabad.
3(k)The Jt. Secretary, Banking Division,
M/o. Finance, Govt. of India, New Delhi
… 1st Party-Managements.
(And)
The General Secretary,
ORITCO Staff Association,
A/130. Sahid Nagar, Bhubaneswar-751 007.
…2nd Party-Union.
APPEARANCES:
M/s. K.N. Mishra, Advocate
…
For the 1st Party-Management No. 1.
None.
...
For the 1st Party-
Mgts. No. 2 to 3(a, d, e, f, h, k)
3988
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
M/s. S. Mishra, Advocate.
...
For the 1st Party-
Mgts. No. 3(g) & 3(i)
Shri Bipin Kumar Ekka,
...
For the 1st Party-
Sr. Manager –HR
Management No. 3(j).
M/s. N.K. Mohanty, Adv.
...
For the 1st Party-
Management No. 3(b).
M/s. B.K. Mohanty, Adv.
...
For the 1st Party-Mgt. No. 3(c).
Shri Lingaraj Parida,
…
For the 2nd Party-
General Secretary.
Union.
AWARD
The award arises out of a reference made by the Ministry of Labour, Government of India vide letter
No. L-12011/81/2005–IR(B-II), dated 20.12.2005 in exercising its authority conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1)
and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (herein after referred to as “The Act”) as a
dispute arose between the ORITCO Staff Association and the management of IDBI and ORITCO Ltd (herein after
referred to as “The Compay”). The schedule of reference is as follows:-
“Whether the action of the management of Industrial Development Bank of India (IDBI) and other share
holders of ORITCO in not paying the statutory dues and service benefits of the employees of the ORITCO who
have rendered continuous service for several years to the organization represented by the ORITCO Staff
Association, Bhubaneswar is legal and justified? If not what relief the workmen are entitled to?”
2.
Briefly stated the case of the Union as emerges from its statement of claim, is that ORITCO company is a
public limited company established in the year 1976 being funded by IDBI and other Banks and financial institutions
like Andhra Bank, State Bank of India, UCO Bank, IFCI, ICICI, Bank of India IPICOL, OSIC. The management of
company was being looked after by a Board of Directors consisting of 12 members. The IDBI having 51% of share in
the said company had five members including the post of Chairman and Managing Director in the said Board of
Directors. Nominees of other financial institutions and State Governments were also in the said Board of Directors. The
Board of Directors being policy makers are responsible for day to day administration and the management of the
company. The company was having 50 employees for managing day to day work. It was engaged to identify Potential
Entrepreneurs, prepare project profile and feasibility reports, undertake Techno Economic Feasibility Report, undertake
Market Research & Surveys, Industrial Management & Financial consultancy, project supervision and technical
assistance, Any type of research, Environmental Impact Studies, and any other training programmes etc. The service
rule of the employee of the company was introduced with the approval of the Board of Directors and the workmen
employed in the company have formed its union as named above which has been duly registered under the Trade
Unions Act, 1926 and recognized by the Management of the company. The employees of the company have been
rendering their job uninterruptedly, continuously and sincerely for last several years and none of them has been ever
charge-sheeted for any misconduct and they have served the establishment to its best satisfaction. But, the
Management of the company including the management of IDBI and other financial institutions failed to take up the
responsibilities of their financial obligations for which the employees of the company did not receive their
wages/salaries and other service benefits like medical reimbursement, leave encashment, yearly increment provident
fund etc. for certain periods. Hence, the 2nd party-Union had placed its grievances before the Managements of IDBI and
other financial institution so as to enable the company to make payment of the statutory dues to its employees. It is the
pleading and stand of the 2nd party-Union that the Management of IDBI and other financial institutions having different
proportionate shares in the company as well as proportionate representations in the Board of Directors are statutorily
duty bound and responsible for making payment of arrear wages and other service benefits to the employees of the
company. When the IDBI and other financial institutions paid a deaf ear to the demand of the 2nd party-Union, a dispute
was raised before the labour machinery resulting in the present reference.
3.
The management of IDBI has contested the claim of the Union denying its liability to make payment of arrear
wages and service benefits to the employees of the company. In its written statement it has been pleaded that IDBI is a
separate legal entity than the company and being a financial institution it had a limited promotional role in the
formation of the company. It has no role in the day to day management, affairs, business and operation of the company.
Its role was restricted to the act of investor/share holder. In the capacity of share-holder it had nominated some
members to the Board. Some other financial institutions having shares in the company have also appointed their
nominees as members of the said Board. The role of the nominees was restricted to the discussion in policy matters
placed before it by the Management of the company and to take decisions on those matters. The ORITICO company
was managed by a team of independent professionals and other supportive staffs having no connections with the
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3989
management of IDBI and other financial institutions. There was no “employer and employee” relationship between the
staffs of the company and IDBI or other financial institutions. It has no control or supervisory power in the selection
and recruitment of Executives and staffs of the company as well as fixation of their wages/salaries and service
conditions. There is also no contract between the IDBI and the employees of the company or the Management of the
said company so as to fasten the Management of IDBI to make payment of wages and service benefits to the
employees. Thus, it has no legal or moral obligation for unpaid salaries and service benefits of the employees except its
liability or obligation limited to the extent of unpaid shares, if any. It has, further, taken a stand that having transferred
it’s shares in favour of SIDBI and withdrawn its nominees from the Board of Directors since long it has no liability or
obligation to the demand of the 2nd party-Union. The Management of ORITCO having failed to make its appearance in
the reference inspite of sufficiency of notice has been duly set exparte. It is pertinent to mention here that at the
instance of the 2nd party-Union other financial institutions i.e. IFCI, IPICOL, State Bank of India, Andhra Bank, UCO
Bank have been impleaded in the case. All of them have also contested the claim of the Union filing their separate
written statements taking almost similar stand taken by the Management of the IDBI.
4.
On the aforesaid pleadings of the parties the following issues have been settled for a just and proper
adjudication of the dispute.
I S S U E S
1. Whether the action of the Management of Industrial Development Bank of India (IDBI) and other share
holders of ORITCO in not paying the statutory dues and service benefits of the employees of the ORITCO
who have rendered continuous service for several years to the organization represented by the ORITCO Staff
Association, Bhubaneswar is legal and justified?
2. Whether the reference is bad for non-joinder and mis-joinder of parties?
3. Whether the 2nd party Union has any locustandi to put forth any claim against the 1st Party-Managements?
4. If not, to what relief the workmen are entitled?
5. The 2nd party-Union has examined three witness namely Shri Bhikiari Charan Tripathy, Shri Kartik Charan
Dehury, and Shri Lingaraj Parida, who are stated to be the staff of the company and filed copy of the
Memorandum of Articles of Association, copies of the letters from IDBI to ORITCO issued on different dates,
copy of the ORITCO Staff Rules, copy of the letter from ORITCO for reorganization to ORITCO Staff
Association on dated 4.8.1983, copies of the appointment orders of workmen, copies of three agreements
between the ORITCO Management and ORITCO Association, copy of the letter of te Union to the
Management and other share holders on different dates, copy of the Award passed in I.D. Case No. 8/2000
passed by the Industrial Tribunal, copy of the order passed in Misc. Case No. 428/95, copy of the written
statement filed in I.D. Case No. 8/2000, copy of the proceeding of the meeting presided by the Government in
Industries Deptt, copies of the revital plant of ORITCO and letters to IDBI and other share holders, copy of
the letter of IDBI for transfer of share to SIDBI on 31.7.2009 & 25.11.2009, copy of the list of ORITCO
Board of Directors invited to last board meeting on 27.08.2002 which are marked as Ext.-1 to Ext.-15 in
support of the pleadings advanced in the statement of claim. Per contra, the Managements of IDBI, State Bank
of India, UCO Bank, Andhra Bank, IPICOL and have examined one witness each to refute the allegations
raised in the claim statement of the Union.
6. Since the issues are inter-linked to each other they are taken into consideration simultaneously for the sake of
convenience.
It is apparent from the pleadings and evidence of the parties that the company of ORITCO has separate legal
entity than the Management of IDBI and other financial institutions who are stated to be the share-holders of
the company. There is no serious dispute that the ORITCO is a public limited company and an Undertakings
of the Government of Odisha. It is also emerging from the evidence of the parties and cross examination of
W.Ws that none of the employees of the ORITCO was appointed by any of the share holders including the
Management of IDBI. The 1st Party-Managements except the company have neither any supervisory role in
the day to day work of the company nor the employees of the company were ever working under the
supervision and control of those Management-Banks. W.W-1 has further admitted that the company was filing
its return separately before the Registrar of the Companies. He admits that liability of the share-holders with
regard to profit and loss of the company is confined only to the dividends. The M.D. of the company was the
appointing authority of the disputant workmen. He admits to have worked under the management of the
company and not under any share-holders. It is elicited from their cross examination that one of the workmen
was retrenched earlier and he was reinstated. Usually suspension/dismissal/retrenchment of the workmen of
the company was not made on approval of the share-holders. It is emerging from his cross examination and
cross examination of other witnesses that on earlier occasions settlements were reached out between the staff
3990
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
and the Management of the company with regard to enhancement of wages and other service conditions and
on those occasions neither the IDBI nor any financial institutions were a party to such settlements.
7. The witnesses examined on behalf of the Financial Institutions have stated in an identical manner that the
financial institutions other than the company are no way liable and responsible for non-payment of salaries
and other service benefits to the staff of the company as no relationship of employer and employee exists
between them and the staff of the company. The employees of the company are covered under the Employees
Provident Funds and other provisions under ORITCO and they were receiving their wages and other benefits
from the Management of ORITCO. There is no privity of contract in any form between the Management of
the company and the Managements of the financial institutions to make the financial institutions legally duty
bound to bear the expenditure of the company towards wages of its staff. Any of the financial institutions has
any nexus with the administrative affairs of the company or its employees. The role of the institutions was
restricted to the role of an investor i.e. share-holder only. Indisputedly, it is emerging from the evidence of
these witnesses that none of the financial institutions has any role in the man-power, planning, recruitment,
selection, appointment of senior executives and other sub-ordinate staffs including fixation of salary, wages
and payment thereof. The ORITCO is neither a subsidiary of the IDBI or any other financial institution. The
staff of the company are governed by the rules and circulars introduced by the Management of ORITCO. It
has been specifically stated by these witnesses that the employees of the company are not the “workmen” of
any of the financial institutions as defined under section 2(s) of the Act. Such oral evidence of the witnesses
has not been demolished in any manner and rather, the same is getting support from the pleadings and
evidence of the 2nd party-Union. It is seen from the evidence of the witness examined on behalf of the IDBI
Management that in the meanwhile the IDBI transferred its share in favour of SIDBI. As per his evidence
those shares having been fully paid, the Management of IDBI has no liability towards loss of the company.
The documents filed by the 2nd party-Union i.e. Ext.-8 and Ext.-9 clearly reveal that on earlier occasions when
there was a dispute regarding enhancement of wages and non-payment of wages, reference and Misc. case
were instituted before the State Industrial Tribunal of Govt. of Odisha and the Management of ORITCO was
dragged only as a party to those reference and the case. Even, if it is accepted for argument sake that the
management of IDBI and other financial institutions had played or acted as a promoter of the company or
funded in formation of the company, they cannot be held responsible or liable for all the times for the liability
incurred by the company. The Management of ORITCO having a separate legal entity and juristic person can
sue and can be sued separately. The Management of all the financial institutions have no role to play either in
the day to day administration of the management of the company or in the appointment of its executives and
sub-ordinate staffs. The 2nd party-Union has failed to file any document to show that there was any privity of
contract by which either the IDBI or any other financial institution impleaded in the reference has a legal
liability towards wages and office expenses of the company. The Memorandum of Association of the company
does not bear any term and condition by virtue of which the share holders or promoters can be dragged into
the court of law to bear the liability of the company towards its office expenses or wages to be paid to its
employees. Be that as it may, the Management of the financial institutions including the IDBI cannot be held
legally or morally liable to make good of the loss sustained by the management of ORITCO so as to enable it
to pay the statutory dues and service benefits to its employees. These financial institutions cannot be
compelled or forced to make payment of statutory dues and service benefits of the workmen of the ORITCO.
The Management of ORITCO is solely liable and responsible for such non-payment of statutory dues and
service benefits. In the facts and circumstances analysed above the Management of ORITCO can be held
liable for non-payment of statutory dues and service benefits to its employees who have rendered continuous
service for several years to the organization and the Management of IDBI or any other Bank/Financial
institution is no way concerned for such non-payment of statutory dues and service benefits.
8. It is not out of place to mention here that the management of IDBI and managements of other financial
institutions have advanced a pleading that the reference is not maintainable in this forum on account of the
dispute is between the management of ORITCO and its employees and the ORITCO being a State
Government undertaking, the appropriate government in the matter is the State Government of Odisha and as
such any effort towards conciliation was supposed to be taken over by the labour machinery of the
Government of Odisha. Admittedly the company is a State Government Undertaking and it has no nexus with
the financial institutions for its day to day administration or management. On earlier occasions dispute
between the employees and the management of ORITCO was referred to the State Industrial Tribunal. Having
regard to the above fact and circumstance doubt can also be entertained on the maintainability of the reference
in this Tribunal.
The reference is answered accordingly.
Dictated & Corrected by me.
B. C. RATH, Presiding Officer
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3991
ubZ fnYyh] 18 ebZ] 2018
dk-vk- 829-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj lSUVªy cSad
vkWiQ bafM;k ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky; la- 2] ubZ fnYyh ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 16@2009) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks
18-05-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&12011@129@2008&vkbZvkj (ch&II)º
jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 18th May, 2018
S.O. 829.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 16/2009) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court No. 2, New Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Central
Bank of India and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 18.05.2018.
[No. L-12011/129/2008-IR (B-II)]
RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE PRESIDING OFFICER: CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR
COURT No.2: ROOM No.512, DWARKA COURT COMPLEX, SECTOR 10, DWARKA, DELHI – 110 075
ID No. 16/2009
The President,
Central Bank Workers Union,
Link House, 4, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg,
Press Area,
New Delhi – 110 002
...Workman
Vs.
The Zonal Manager,
Central Bank of India,
Link House,
3, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg,
New Delhi – 110 002
…Management
AWARD
In this case a reference was received from the Ministry of Labour and Employment vide letter No. L-12011/
129/2008-(IR(B-II) dated 11.02.2009 under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, (in short, the Act) this for adjudication of an industrial dispute, terms of which are as
under :
‘Whether the action of the management of Central Bank of India in terminating the services of Shri Anil
Kumar with effect from 07.08.2007 is just, fair and legal? What relief the workman concerned is entitled to
and from which date?’
2.
Both parties were put to notice and upon appearance, Shri Anil Kumar (hereinafter referred to as the claimant)
filed statement of claim with the averments that he had been in the services of Central Bank of India (hereinafter
referred to as the Bank) for the last 20 years and was an Executive member of Central Bank Workers Union . He was
served with a charge sheet on 28.10.2006 alleging misappropriation by him for Rs.60,580.00 when he was working as
clerk at Sarita Vihar branch. This charge sheet was issued to the claimant in a well planned manner to punish him for
his trade union activities. Even prior to issue of the said charge sheet, claimant was issued various memos. Claimant
filed reply to the memo as well as charge sheet. However, the same was not considered by the management. It is clear
from the records that Shri R.S. Sharma, was appointed as Enquiry Officer , by the bank who has conducted a mock and
fake enquiry and enquiry report dated 28.03.2007 was submitted to him to the disciplinary authority whereby claimant
has been held guilty of the charges mentioned in the charge sheet. Thereafter, claimant filed an appeal on 20.07.2007
with Deputy General Manager. However, the same was rejected on 10.10.2017 in a mechanical manner without
appreciation of the submissions made by the claimant. Even the mercy plea filed by the claimant to the management
was also rejected as being not admissible. Claimant challenged validity of the domestic enquiry during the proceedings
3992
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
before this court by alleging that the same is in violation of principles of natural justice as well as banking norms.
Enquiry Officer was also acting under the guidance of the management as is clear from the records.
3.
It is further alleged that Shri Rajesh Goyal, DW-1 had sent Rs.60,580.00 to the claimant through his servant
and he has supported the version of the claimant by stating that the entire fault was that of his servant and not that of
the claimant. However, the Enquiry Officer has ignored the defence version of the claimant and has also not been
provided copy of Vigilance Officer’s report. Finally, the claimant has filed order of dismissal passed against him by
the competent authority.
4.
Management has filed written statement to the claim petition filed by the claimant, wherein specific
preliminary objections have been taken. It has been admitted that the claimant was in service of the bank previously
for the last 20 years and was also member of Executive Committee of Central Bank Workers Union. There is also
reference to the reply filed by the claimant. It is denied that the management had not considered evidence adduced by
the claimant. It is further alleged that the claimant is in fact guilty of misconduct and he was placed under suspension
on 02.09.2006 and thereafter he was issued charge sheet dated 28.10.2006 as per provisions of Clause 12 (b) of
Memorandum of Settlement against the claimant. Claimant has attended most of the enquiry proceedings conducted by
the management and he claimant has sought unnecessary adjournments. He was fully aware of the various dates of
proceedings of the enquiry. After considering the entire evidence on record, Enquiry Officer submitted his report
holding the charges to be proved against the claimant and management after considering the same and after due
application of mind has passed a reasoned order resulting in dismissal of the claimant.
5.
Rejoinder to the written statement was filed by the claimant wherein the stand taken in the statement of claim
was reiterated.
6.
Against this factual background, this Tribunal on the basis of pleadings of the parties, has framed the
following issues:
(i)
Whether the departmental enquiry conducted in this case is legal, just and fair and is not in violation
of the principles of natural justice? If not, what directions are called for in this case?
(ii)
As per the reference sent by the Government of India in this case.
(iii)
Relief.
7.
Issue No.(i) pertaining to the domestic enquiry was treated as preliminary issue and both parties adduced
evidence regarding privity of the enquiry before this Tribunal. This Tribunal vide order dated 08.06.2016 concluded
that the domestic enquiry has not been conducted in a fair manner and the same is against the principles of natural
justice. Accordingly, issue No.1 was decided in favour of the claimant and against the management.
8.
Thereafter, this Tribunal afforded an opportunity to the management to adduce evidence on the charge of
misconduct as mentioned in charge sheet Ex.WW1/1. Management, in order to prove misconduct initially filed
affidavit of Shri R.S. Sharma. But, later on, an application was moved on behalf of the management for substitution of
the management witness, which application was rejected by this Tribunal on the grounds of delaying tactics being
adopted by the management and evidence of the management was closed by the order of the court on 25.04.2017 and
the case was listed for workman evidence/arguments. Again, an application was moved on behalf of the management
for examining Shri Naveen Kumar, for proving misconduct of the claimant, which application was also rejected by the
Tribunal.
9.
The claimant examined himself and his affidavit is Ex.WW1/B.
10.
It is pertinent to mention here that the Hon’ble High Court in WP(C) No.5294/2017 titled ‘Central Bank of
India Vs. Anil Kumar’ has afforded an opportunity to the management to examine Shri Naveen Kumar as a witness,
subject to cost. It was against this background that Shri Naveen Kumar was examined as MW2 before this Tribunal.
11.
In the present case, it is clear from perusal of the charge sheet Ex.WW1/1 that the claimant herein was charged
on account of misconduct in respect of the following charges:
On 20.04.2016, Shri Anil Kumar received cash of Rs.60,580.00 towards payment of fees of four students of
DAV Public School, as per details given hereunder:
S.
No.
Receipt
No.
Name of Student
Class
and
Section
For the Quarter
Amount (Rs.)
1
003146
Dhruv Goyal
IX-A
April, May and June’06
5440
2
003146
Dhruv Goyal
IX-A
July, Aug. and Sept.06
3840
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3993
3
003146
Dhruv Goyal
IX-A
Oct., Nov. and Dec.06
3840
4
003146
Dhruv Goyal
IX-A
Jan., Feb. and March’07
3840
5
002820
Pratika Goyal
VIII-B
April, May and June’06
4915
6
002820
Pratika Goyal
VIII-B
July, Aug. and Sept.06
3315
7
002820
Pratika Goyal
VIII-B
Oct., Nov. and Dec.06
3315
8
002820
Pratika Goyal
VIII-B
Jan., Feb. and March’07
3315
9
001870
Manika Goyal
V-A
April, May and June’06
4885
10
001870
Manika Goyal
V-A
July, Aug. and Sept.06
3285
11
001870
Manika Goyal
V-A
Oct., Nov. and Dec.06
3285
12
001870
Manika Goyal
V-A
Jan., Feb. and March’07
3285
13
000636
Aryam Goyal
I-A
April, May and June’06
4705
14
000636
Aryam Goyal
I-A
July, Aug. and Sept.06
3105
15
000636
Aryam Goyal
I-A
Oct., Nov. and Dec.06
3105
16
000636
Aryam Goyal
I-A
Jan., Feb. and March’07
3105
TOTAL
60,580
While receiving amount of Rs.60,580.00 following lapses were committed by Shri Anil Kumar:
o
On 20.04.2006, Shri Anil Kumar was not working at Cash Receipt seat of the branch even then he
received cash as mentioned above and issued cash receipts in respect of above mentioned 16 cash
deposit receipts.
o
Cash amount of Rs.60,580.00 was received by Shri Anil Kumar without getting the above mentioned
receipts scrolled from the accounts department.
o
In token of having received the said amount, Shri Anil Kumar issued/released counterfoils, i.e.
parent’s copies of the receipts under his initials/signatures by putting rubber stamp of cash receipt of
branch office Savita Vihar dated 20.04.2006. Amount of Rs.60,580.00 deposited through these
receipts was not account for on 20.04.2006 at BO:Savit Vihar. Thus Shri Anil Kumar did not
deposit the said amount of Rs. 60,580.00 in current account No.1001323230 of DAV Public School,
Shreshta Vihar on 20.04.2006.
o
On 29.07.2006 DAV School forwarded the photocopies of aforesaid fee receipts to Savita Vihar
branch and requested for taking necessary action as the fees deposited through the above mentioned
receipts was not credited in the School’s account maintained with the branch. On 08.08.2006 entire
fees of Rs.60,580.00 plus late fees as applicable in respect of above mentioned students was
deposited in the branch through the deposit receipts of the concerned students bearing the same serial
number as the serial numbers printed on the counterfoils released by Shri Anil Kukar on 20.04.2006.
Thus, Shri Anil Kumar misappropriated funds of Rs.60,580 for 110 days.
12.
Claimant has also filed reply to the above charge sheet which is Ex.WW1/4 wherein he has denied the
allegations contained in the charge sheet. In para 6 and 7 of his reply, he has clearly stated that as far as he recollects,
on 20.04.2006, one of his friends, named Shri Rajesh Goyal, whose children are studying in DAV Public School
Shreshta Vihar sent his servant to deposit school fees. There was rush at the receipt cash counter so he took the money
and School’s challan from him and returned the parent’s copy after affixing stamp thereon on the slips of challan as
the servant told him that Shri Goyal is in a hurry. Shri Goyal was well known to him and he gave duly receipted
stamped challan copy to him and looking to his urgency, he asked the servant to wait so that he could count the cash.
While he was counting the cash, he found some notes defective and asked the servant to get them changed. The servant
came back after some time and informed him that Shri Goyal had already left and his number is not responding, hence
the claimant returned the challan copy and money to the servant and asked him to bring proper cash.
13.
It is pertinent to note here that vide order dated 11.10.2017, learned authorized representatives for the
respective parties have stated that they have no objection in case documents which have been exhibited and proved
during the course of evidence before this Tribunal while considering validity of domestic enquiry are taken into
consideration. It was thereafter that evidence of Shri Naveen Kumar was recorded.
3994
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
14.
It is well settled principle in law that when the domestic enquiry conducted by the management has been held
to be unfair or against the principles of natural justice, the evidence so recorded during the course of domestic enquiry
would not constitute to be ‘fresh evidence’ or ‘material on record’ within the meaning of Section 11-A of the Act. As
such, enquiry proceedings have been found to be bad and cannot be taken into consideration so as to prove the charge
of misconduct against the delinquent official.
15.
Now the main question before this Tribunal is as to whether the management has succeeded in proving the
misconduct against the claimant herein. In this regard, the only evidence by the management after holding domestic
enquiry to be unfair and against the principles of natural justice is that of Shri Naveen Kumar, MW2 and his affidavit is
Ex.MW2/A. He has also tendered in evidence documents Ex.MW2/1 to Ex.MW2/11. He has admitted in his statement
that letter dated 07.08.2006 as mentioned in para 4 of his affidavit Ex.MW2/A has not been placed on court file. He
further admitted that there was no written order with respect to assigning of duties of payment cashier to the claimant.
The said order was oral. He has admitted that he was a witness of the management in the domestic enquiry. He has
admitted that in his evidence before the Enquiry Officer that payments cashier also takes receipt of cash from
customers in exigencies of the bank and to provide better customer service. This witness was specifically asked about
receipts Ex.MW1/1 to MW1/4 but he was not in a position to state as to who deposited amounts mentioned in the said
receipt. He further stated that he is not aware whether Shri Rajesh Goyal appeared as a witness in the domestic
enquiry. However, he has made a vital admission that a letter dated 08.09.2006 was received from the school
authorities and this fact is clearly mentioned in the Enquiry Report at page No.70, contents of which are as under:
‘Reference to your letter dated 11.08.2006 on the above noted subject, I am to inform you that the
parents of the students as mentioned in your letter under reference have deposited the entire fees on
08.08.2006 and also given a regret letter to the school authorities regretting the inconvenience to the
school/bank.’ and the letter has been signed by Prem Lata Garg, Principal.
16.
Hence, it is apparent that the school authorities have admitted that parents of the students have deposited the
entire fees on 08.08.2006 and have also given letter of the school authorities in this behalf that any inconvenience
caused to Goyal or the School is regretted and now the school has no complaint against the bank. This letter has been
signed by Ms.Prem Lata Garg, Principal of the school. Thus, it is clear from perusal of this letter as well as other
evidence on record that the claimant herein has not misappropriated the amount in question in any manner and the
entire fees in respect of the students stood deposited on 08.08.2006. Thus, there is no question of any kind of
misappropriation or embezzlement of the above amount. Equally vital is the fact that in the charge sheet management
has used the expression ‘lapses have been committed by the claimant.’
17.
Since from the evidence on record, it is clear that there is no misappropriation of funds of any kind committed
by the claimant, as such, this Tribunal is of the view that the management has failed to prove charge of misconduct
against the claimant. Thus, the action of the management in terminating services of the claimant Shri Anil Kumar with
effect from 07.08.2007 is unjust, unfair and illegal. Hence, management is directed to reinstate Shri Anil Kumar, the
claimant herein in service with all consequential benefits. An award is, accordingly, passed. Let a copy of this Award
be sent for publication as required under Section 17 of the Act.
A.C. DOGRA, Presiding Officer
Dated: March 12, 2018
ubZ fnYyh] 18 ebZ] 2018
dk-vk- 830-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj ;wdks cSad ds
çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k@Je
U;k;ky;] t;iqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 16@2009) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18-05-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&12011@112@2008&vkbZvkj (ch&II)º
jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 18th May, 2018
S.O. 830.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 13/2009) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Jaipur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of UCO Bank and
their workmen, received by the Central Government on 18.05.2018.
[No. L-12011/112/2008-IR (B-II)]
RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3995
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, JAIPUR
PRAMOD KUMAR CHATURVEDI
PRESIDING OFFICER
I.D. 13/2009
Reference No. L-12011/112/2008-IR (B-II)
Dated: 10.2.2009
General Secretary
UCO Bank Employees Association
Zonal Office, Imperial Hotel Building,
M.I.Road, Jaipur.
V/S
Dy. General Manager
UCO Bank Zonal Office,
Arcade International, Civil Lines, Jaipur.
For the applicant Union
:
Sh. R.C.Jain, Representative.
For the opposite party
:
Sh. Ramkumar Sharma, Advocate.
AWARD
1. The Central Government in exercise of the powers conferred under clause (d) of Sub Section 1 & 2 (A) of
Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 has referred the following Industrial dispute to this tribunal for
adjudication:-
“ Whether the action of the management of UCO Bank through Dy. General Manager, Jaipur in recovering
the amount of Rs.5581/- on 5.5.1998 from the salary of the employee Shri Girish Chand Sharma, Head
Cashier from his pay of Jan., to March 1998 on account of lost of key by the employee without providing an
opportunity of being heard is just and fair? What relief the workman is entitled to and from which date?”
2. The case was called for several times. Learned representative for applicant union is present. None responds for
the opposite party.
3. After receiving the reference from the Ministry of Labour & Employment, Govt. of India notices were served
on both the parties. In response to the notice to the applicant Union, UCO Bank Employees Association,
Jaipur, submitted the statement of claim alleging that the workman Sh. Girish Chand Sharma has been
working as Head Cashier in the Bais-Godown branch of UCO bank & has also been a member of the
Associated Union. Workman Sh. Girish Chand Sharma while working as Head Cashier in the aforesaid
branch was served with notice dated 29.12.97 which he replied. It has further alleged that the Branch
Manager, MandabhimSingh without holding a proper enquiry deducted Rs.5581.30 on 8.5.98 from the salary
of the month January, February & March, 1988 of the workman for a charge of the cost of the keys which was
illegal & improper as no proper enquiry was held into the matter. The aforesaid union requested the Manager
to restore/repaid of the aforesaid amount to the workman but to no result. It has been further alleged that the
aforesaid workman was very much present on 13.7.97, 14.7.97 & 17.9.97 but the Manager of the branch
debited his leaves for the aforesaid period from his account. It has been further alleged that without any reason
the branch manager did not pay salary of the period from 3.11.97 to 6.11.97 without any reason. It has been
further alleged that the workman Sh. Girish Chand Sharma was to be granted the increments on 1.2.98,
1.2.2001 & 1.2.2004 as stagnation increment but same was not done without showing any reason. It has been
further alleged that the branch manager has also deducted Rs.1000/- from the pay of the workman without any
reason & conducting any enquiry. It has been further alleged that the branch manager directed the workman to
appear before the Superintendent of Police, Dausa on 19.4.1999 which he complied the direction of the branch
manager but his travelling allowance bill was rejected by the branch manager. Thus, it has been prayed that all
the aforesaid deductions be declared illegal & the workman be directed to be paid Rs.5581.30 in lieu of the
3996
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
deductions for the cost of the keys. It has further been prayed that workman Sh. Girish Chand Sharma be
granted first, second & third stagnation increment w.e.f. 1.2.98, 1.2.2001 & 1.2.2004 respectively along with
Rs. 1000/- being deducted from the salary of the workman by the branch manager. It has been further prayed
that he also be paid his salary of the four days leaves as deducted by the branch manager from the leave
account of the workman & four days leaves shown in the account be treated as working days of the workman.
4. The opposite party despite service, an acknowledgement of service received & also Mr. Rajkumar Kumawat,
Advocate filing his appearance on behalf of the opposite party thrice did not prefer to submit the written
statement, therefore, the case was ordered to proceed ex-parte against the opposite party on 28.7.2011.
5. The applicant union submitted affidavit of workman Sh. Girish Chand Sharma who reiterated the averments
made in the statement of claim & the opposite party despite not submitting written statement has also not
preferred to cross examine him, thus, the affidavit of the workman is fit to be believed. Thus, the reference is
finally disposed off with the observation as under:-
“The action of the management of UCO Bank through Dy. General Manager, Jaipur in recovering the
amount of Rs.5581/- on 5.5.1998 from the salary of the employees Sh. Girish Chand Sharma, Head Cashier
from his salary from January to March, 1998 on account of loss of keys by the employee without providing
an opportunity of being heard was unjust & unfair.”
6. As regards other prayers sought in the statement of claim cannot be entertained because the tribunal has no
locus standii or jurisdiction to go beyond the scope of the reference.
7. Thus, in the light of the aforesaid observations the opposite party UCO bank is directed to pay Rs.5581/- with
6% composite interest along with Rs.20,000/- as legal expenses to the employee within the sixty days from the
publication of the award. The award is passed accordingly.
8. Award as above.
PRAMOD KUMAR CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 18 ebZ] 2018
dk-vk- 831-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj dksydÙkk
iksVZ VªLV ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] dksydÙkk ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 22@2008) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18-05-2018 dks
çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&32011@3@2008&vkbZvkj (ch&II)º
jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 18th May, 2018
S.O. 831.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 22/2008) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Kolkata as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Kolkata Port
Trust and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 18.05.2018.
[No. L-32011/3/2008-IR (B-II)]
RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Reference No. 22 of 2008
Parties: Employers in relation to the management of Kolkata Port Trust
AND
Their workmen.
Present: Justice Ravindra Nath Mishra
…Presiding Officer
Appearance:
On behalf of the
: Mr. G. Mukherjee, Industrial Relations Officer.
Management
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3997
On behalf of the
:
M r. G.C. Chakraborty, Adviser to the Union.
Workmen
State: West Bengal.
Industry: Port & Dock.
Dated: 11th May, 2018
A W A R D
By Order No.L-32011/3/2008-IR(B-II) dated 15.09.2008 the Government of India, Ministry of Labour in
exercise of its powers under Section 10(1)(d) and (2A) of the industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following
dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:
“Whether the demand of the Calcutta Port Trust Worker’s Union, claiming for promotion of Sri Manoj
Upadhayay, LDC on selection basis, to the post of Law Assistant in Estate Department of Kolkata Port Trust,
is justified and legal? If so, to what relief the workman is entitled for?”
2.
In response to notice issued by this Tribunal, parties appeared and filed their pleadings. In the statement of
claim, the workman’s union has stated that Shri Manoj Upadhayay was initially appointed as T.T. Driver under C.T.M.
of Kolkata Port Trust on 3rd September, 1991. Subsequently he was appointed as Lower Division Clerk with effect
from 3rd July, 2000 and was posted at Mechanical Engineering Department. He was entrusted with the matters relating
to court cases. He was also asked to appear before the Estate Officer in various court cases as and when the concerned
Assistant Law Manager (Legal) was not available. Thus he was discharging all the duties and responsibilities which
were vested with the Law Assistant. The management of Kolkata Port Trust issued a circular for filling of the post of
Law Assistant in the Estate Department fixing essential criteria interalia that a candidate having 10 years working
experience either as Head Clerk or as Head Clerk and U.D.C. taken together with a degree in law from recognized
university and thorough knowledge of the procedure of civil and criminal courts. The circular was issued by the
management with a vindictive attitude to deprive the workman from his legitimate claim for the post of Law Assistant
as previously one Shri Somnath Dey who was working as a Lower Division Clerk have been promoted as Law
Assistant in the year 1988 on the basis of circular dated 8th June, 1987 in which there was no criteria of 10 years
experience. The decision of the management for filling up the post of Law Assistant from outsiders particularly from
the ex-army men is the vindictive action of the management against the workman. Despite several demands the
management did not disclose rules and procedure for promotion of Shri Somnath Dey in the year 1988. Thus, refusal
for promotion of the workman to the post of Law assistant in the Estate Department with effect from 5th February, 2004
is not at all justified.
3.
The management has contested the claim of the union by filing written statement in which it has been interalia
pleaded that the post of Law Assistant in the scale of Rs.6170 – 11975 under the Estate Department is in Class-III cadre
and is the highest scale of pay available in the said cadre. The post of Law Assistant being a selection grade post,
promotion is to be made strictly as per the merit of the eligible candidates and not on the basis of seniority or seniority-
cum-suitability. It has further been pleaded that in the year 2002 a post of Law Assistant in the Estate Department fell
vacant and it was decided to fill up the vacancy of departmental candidates from amongst the Head Clerk having 10
years of service and LL.B. degree. Accordingly a circular was issued on 10th February, 2003 inviting applications from
the eligible candidates of all the departments of Kolkata Dock System. However, no application was received against
the said circular. Therefore, it was decided to relax experience criteria from 10 years as Head Clerk to 10 years of
service in different cadres from LDC to Head Clerk taken together. This time also, candidates fulfilling the
requirements were not available compelling the management to further relax experience criteria. The experience
criteria was relaxed to 10 years experience as U.D. Clerk (Selection grade) and Head Clerk taken together with LL.B.
degree. This time also no application was received in response to the circular. Therefore, it was decided to approach the
Government seeking permission for filling up the post by direct recruitment. On 21st Februry, 2005 when second
circular was issued by Estate Department inviting applications from the Head Clerk having LL.B. degree and 10 years
experience in clerical grade, the workman Shri Manoj Upadhayay made an application for the said post but as his
qualification and experience did not match to the stipulated requirement, his case was not considered. The management
has further pleaded that promotion of Shri Somnath Dey for the post of Law Assistant in the year 1988 is distinctly
different on facts and circumstances of the case which cannot form basis of promotion of Shri Manoj Upadhayay. The
management has denied that vindictive attitude has been taken towards Shri Majoj Upadhayay to deprive him of his
claim for the post of Law Assistant and a new procedure for promotion to the post of Law Assistant was adopted. It is
also denied that shri Manoj Upadhayay ever discharged duties and responsibilities of a Law Assistant. Finally it is
pleaded that demand for promotion of the workman, Shri Manoj Upadhayay to the post of Law Assistant is unjustified
and without any merit and consequently he is not entitled to any relief.
3998
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
4.
The union has filed a rejoinder against the written statement of the management reiterating the facts stated in
the statement of claim.
5.
In support of the claim of the workman the union has examined the concerned workman as WW-01 who has
also been cross-examined by the management. For the management Smt. Subarna Thakur as MW-01 has filed her
affidavit in examination in chief and has appeared for cross-examination by the union.
6.
The contention of the union is that the circulars issued by the management on 10th November, 2003,
20th October, 2005 and on 11th August, 2006 prescribing 10 years experience is nothing but vindictive attitude towards
the workman as previously the circular dated 8th June, 1987 issued for promotion to the post of Law Assistant and on
the basis of which Shri Somnath Dey was promoted does not prescribe any experience. The union has further
contended that the workman has been discharging duties and responsibilities of Law Assistant and therefore, he is
entitled for promotion to the post.
7.
Now the question arises whether an employee has a right for promotion? Elaborating this point, Hon’ble
Supreme Court has held in Badrinath v. Government of Tamilnadu & Ors, AIR 2000 SC 3243 that every officer has
right to be considered for promotion under Article 16 of the Constitution to higher post subject to eligibility provided
he is within the zone of consideration and the courts will not interfere with the assessment made by the departmental
promotion committee, unless the aggrieved officer establishes that the non-promotion was malafide. Now, in the
present case, as per subsequent circulars issued by the management of Kolkata Port Trust, the workman Shri Manoj
Uoadhayay was not at all within the zone of consideration. Simply because in circular issued in 1987 the requirement
of experience was not there, it cannot be said that subsequent circular was malafide or in any way vindictive towards to
the workman.
8.
It is not the case of the union that the management had no authority to issue circulars dated 10.11.2003 and
11.08.2006 prescribing work experience. There is nothing in Kolkata Port Trust Employees (Recruitment, Seniority and
Promotion) Regulations, 1985 which prescribed eligibility for promotion to the post of Law Assistant. It is for the
management to decide criteria for eligibility by issuing circulars. The workman is not discriminated from amongst the
equals, i.e., it is not the case of the union that in pursuance of subsequent circular somebody was appointed as Law
Assistant who had no work experience.
9.
The union has relied on letter dated 19th January, 2010 of Kolkata Port Trust to contend that shri Somnath
Dey was promoted to the post of Law Assistant on the basis of circular dated 8th June, 1987. The above letter dated
19th January, 2010 is a report submitted by the Land Manager of Estate Department on representation of the workman
which mentions promotion of shri Somnath Dey in the year 1988 but at the same time it also mentions that
recruitment/promotion was done in contravention of the recruitment rules and the recruitment rules were not followed.
It also mentions that the mistakes done by the management cannot be perpetuated. Thus, even though the workman was
discriminated, his promotion to the post of Law Assistant has no legal foundation as two wrongs could not make one
right. Hon’ble Supreme Court in Kastha Niwarak Grahnirman Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit v. Indore
Development Authority, AIR 2006 SC 1142 has held that two wrongs do not make one right. The relevant portion of
the judgment may be extracted as below for better appreciation:
“Two wrongs do not make one right. A party cannot claim that since something wrong has been done in
another case, direction should be given for doing another wrong. It would not be setting a wrong right, but
would be perpetuating another wrong. In such matters, there is no discrimination involved. The concept of
equal treatment on the logic of Article 14 of the Constitution cannot be pressed into service in such cases.
What the concept of equal treatment presupposes is existence of similar legal foothold. It does not
countenance repetition of wrong action to bring both wrongs at par. Even if hypothetically it is accepted that
wrong has been committed in some other case by introducing a concept of negative equality, the appellant
cannot strengthen its case. It has to establish its case on some other basis and not by claiming negative
equality.”
Thus on the basis of precedence of Shri Somnath Dey the union cannot claim promotion of the workman to the post of
Law Assistant.
10.
The union can also not claim promotion of workman, Shri Manoj Upadhayay to the post of Law Assistant on
the basis of entrustment of duties and responsibilities of law Assistant. A person can be promoted only when he fulfills
the requisite qualification for a particular post. Similarly, because a person has been entrusted the work relating to court
and legal matters, he does not become entitled to hold the post of Law Assistant.
11.
In view of the above, I come to the conclusion that the demand of the Kolkata Port Trust Worker’s Union
claiming promotion of Shri Manoj Upadhayay , LDC on selection basis to the post of Law Assistant in the Estate
Department is not at all justified and legal and therefore he is not entitled to any relief.
Award is passed accordingly.
Justice RAVINDRA NATH MISHRA, Presiding Officer
Dated, Kolkata,
11th May, 2018.
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
3999
ubZ fnYyh] 21 ebZ] 2018
dk-vk- 832-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj] mi
funs'kd] ;wukuh fpfdRlk] {ks=kh; vuqla/ku laLFkku] y[kuÅ vkSj vU; ,oa muds deZpkjh ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds
deZdkjksa ds chp vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] y[kuÅ ds iapkV
(lanHkZ la[;k 18@2005) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 09-05-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&42025@03@2018&vkbZvkj (Mh-;w-)º
jktsUnz tks'kh] mi funs'kd
New Delhi, the 21st May, 2018
S.O. 832.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Misc. No. 18/2005) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Lucknow as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the
Dy. Director, Regional Research Institute of Unani Medicine, Lucknow & other and their workmen, which was
received by the Central Government on 09.05.2018.
[No. L-42025/03/2008-IR (DU)]
RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW
PRESENT: Rakesh Kumar, Presiding Officer
Misc No. 18/2005
Sri Balram Singh Lodhi S/o Sri Ram Pal
R/o Village Raniapur, Post Awarawan Distt. Lucknow
Vs
1. Dy. Director,
Regional Research Institute of Unani Medicine
163-164, Terhi Pulia, Kursi Road
Sector, C, Jankipuram, Lucknow
2. The Director
Central Council for Research in Unani Medicine
61-65, Industrial Area, Opposite D Block
Janakpuri, New Delhi
ORDER
The petitioner Sri Balram Singh Lodhi has moved application under section 33 of the I.D. Act,
mentioning therein that he alongwith some other workmen had raised the industrial dispute pertaining to their
regularization before ALC (C), after failure of the conciliation matter was referred by the Govt. for adjudication
which was sent to the Tribunal. It has been alleged in the petition that during the pendency of the proceeding
before the ALC( C) the employer has stopped to take work from the applicant w.e.f. 25.7.2000 on the pretext of the
shortage of fund, after interference by the ALC (C) the applicant alongwith other workmen were taken back in
service, and since then they have been working with some notional break. Proceedings pending under the
Minimum Wages Act. as case no. 231-234/2000 have also been mentioned in the petition.
2. The workman has alleged that during the pendency of the connected I.D. case, the management has
stopped to take work from him w.e.f. 23.01.2004, it amounts to retrenchment the said retrenchment is
illegal and void-ab-initio, protection of Section 25F of the I.D. Act, ought to have been given since the
petitioner has worked for more than 6 years continuously without any break. Contravention of Section 33
of the I.D. Act. has also been stressed in the petition. With the aforesaid averments, request has been made
to declare the termination of the service of the applicant w.e.f. 23.01.2004 as illegal and unjustified.
Further prayer has been made for his reinstatement with full back wages etc. The petition is supported by
an affidavit of the workman.
4000
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
3. The management has filed objection M-11, with strong denial of the allegations made by the workman. It
has been asserted by the opposite party that the ALC ( C ) has no jurisdiction and petitioner is speaking
lie, and contrary version has been taken by the workmen, firstly he was claiming stoppage of work from
25.07.2004, some where it is 23.01.2004. The opposite party has further asserted that the application is
misconceived and is liable to be dismissed.
4. Later on reply/rejoinder W-17 has been filed by the workmen with strong denial of the counter allegations
leveled in the objection filed by the management, reiterating the pleas taken in the petition filed by him.
5. The workman has filed affidavit alongwith annexures. He has been cross examined on behalf of the
management.
6. The management has filed affidavit of Smt. Rafat Mehmooda M-35, Dr. Idris Ahmed, M-39, Waseem
Ahmed, M-51 and Dr. Mohd. Arshad, M-52.
7. With the consent of both the parties certified photo copies of cross examination of Dr. M.Arshad and Idris
Ahmad have been filed in this case.
8. Perusal of the record reveals that the conduct of the management has been very careless and lethargic, and
on several occasions matter was taken ex-parte but on the request of the opposite party, the ex-parte order
was recalled. However, the cost imposed by the Court was not paid to the workman and the official of the
management or the Learned AR of the management refrained themselves to appear and to participate in
the proceeding of the case. Again several dates were fixed, so as to give more opportunity to the opposite
party to participate in the process of dispensation of justice but the management and its officers have been
very negligent, and the officials and the Learned AR abstained themselves for the reasons best known to
them. Undoubtedly, proceedings can not be lingered on endlessly or perpetually without any cogent and
genuine reason. Under these circumstances the arguments of the Learned AR of the workman were heard
at length and record has been scanned thoroughly.
9. The main allegations of the workman is that during the pendency of the connected I.D. 110/02 which has
arisen with reference to the Schedule dated 25.06.2002 referred by the Govt. of India to this Tribunal for
adjudication, the opposite party has with malafide intention stopped to take work from the petitioner
workman w.e.f. 23.01.2004, the so called contradiction in the petition regarding the date of stoppage of
work has been duly explained by the workman. The petitioner has elaborated that on intervention made by
the ALC ( C ) the workman alongwith other colleagues was taken back in service and later on he was
retrenched from 23.01.2004, as a consequence of stoppage of work.
10. The management witness Dr. M. Idris in his cross examination (recorded in I.D. 110/02 has admitted that
he had not perused any record pertaining to the workman/labourer). However, he has given name of
5 persons working in the Herb Garden w.e.f. 2007 to 2015. Other management witness Sri Idris Ahmad in
his cross examination (recorded in I.D. 110/02) has admitted in para 7 that the concerned petitioners have
worked in the department as daily wagers and relevant muster roll should have been there in the
concerned department.
11. The management has failed to corroborate its version that the petitioner had not worked beyond
12.07.2000. Learned AR for the workman has emphatically asserted that the petitioner has continued to
work till 22.01.2004.
12. Another material fact has been brought to the notice of the Court. The case no. MW 231 to 234 of 2000,
under the Minimum Wages Act. was adjudicated in favour of the workman vide order dated 06.07.2005
wherein the management has directed to ensure the payment of the compensation etc. to the applicants
and other workmen in the respective cases. Any evidence by the opposite party to contradict this judgment
has not been filed. The management did not produce the muster roll and the attendance register before the
Competent Authority.
13. After having heard the learned AR for the workman and perusal of the record available before the Court,
it is inferred that the alleged termination of service of the applicant w.e.f. 23.01.2004 during the pendency
of the connected I.D. 110/02, can not be adjudged as legal or justified. Provisions of Section 33 A of the
I.D. Act. are mandatory in nature and it has to be followed in letter and spirit. The aforesaid
termination is set aside, and petitioner is entited for his reinstatement alongwith full back wages.
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
4001
The arrear due, shall be paid by the management within 10 weeks,from the date of notification of
the Award, failing which the petitioner will also be entitled to get interest @ 6% per annum.
Petition dated 06.04.2005 is disposed accordingly.
14. Award as above
RAKESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer
Lucknow
01.05.2018
ubZ fnYyh] 21 ebZ] 2018
dk-vk- 833-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj] mi
funs'kd] ;wukuh fpfdRlk] {ks=kh; vuqla/ku laLFkku] y[kuÅ vkSj vU; ,oa muds deZpkjh ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds
deZdkjksa ds chp vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] y[kuÅ ds iapkV
(lanHkZ la[;k 06@2005) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 09-05-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&42025@03@2018&vkbZvkj (Mh-;w-)º
jktsUnz tks'kh] mi funs'kd
New Delhi, the 21st May, 2018
S.O. 833.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Misc. No. 06/2005) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Lucknow as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the
Dy. Director, Regional Research Institute of Unani Medicine, Lucknow & other and their workmen, which was
received by the Central Government on 09.05.2018.
[No. L-42025/03/2018-IR (DU)]
RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW
PRESENT: Rakesh Kumar, Presiding Officer
Misc No. 6/2005
Sri Om Prakash Verma
S/o Sri Chhotey Lal
R/o Village Quila Mohammadi Nagar
Post: Bhadurkh, Distt. Lucknow
Vs
1. Dy. Director,
Regional Research Institute of Unani Medicine
163-164, Terhi Pulia, Kursi Road
Sector, C, Jankipuram, Lucknow
2. The Director
Central Council for Research in Unani Medicine
61-65, Industrial Area, Opposite D Block
Janakpuri, New Delhi
ORDER
The petitioner Sri O.P. Verma has moved application under section 33 of the I.D. Act, mentioning therein
that he alongwith some other workmen had raised the industrial dispute pertaining to their regularization before
ALC ( C ), after failure of the conciliation matter was referred by the Govt. for adjudication which was sent to the
Tribunal. It has been alleged in the petition that during the pendency of the proceeding before the ALC( C) the
employer has stopped to take work from the applicant w.e.f. 25.7.2000 on the pretext of the shortage of fund, after
interference by the ALC ( C ) the applicant alongwith other workmen were taken back in service, and since then
they have been working with some notional break. Proceedings pending under the Minimum Wages Act. as case
no. 231-234/2000 have also been mentioned in the petition.
4002
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2. The workman has alleged that during the pendency of the connected I.D. case, the management has
stopped to take work from him w.e.f. 23.01.2004, it amounts to retrenchment the said retrenchment is
illegal and void-ab-initio, protection of Section 25F of the I.D. Act, ought to have been given since the
petitioner has worked for more than 6 years continuously without any break. Contravention of Section 33
of the I.D. Act. has also been stressed in the petition. With the aforesaid averments, request has been made
to declare the termination of the service of the applicant w.e.f. 23.01.2004 as illegal and unjustified.
Further prayer has been made for his reinstatement with full back wages etc. The petition is supported by
an affidavit of the workman.
3. The management has filed ;objection M-8, with strong denial of the allegations made by the workman. It
has been asserted by the opposite party that the ALC ( C ) has no jurisdiction and petitioner is speaking
lie, and contrary version has been taken by the workmen, firstly he was claiming stoppage of work from
25.07.2004, some where it is 23.01.2004. The opposite party has further asserted that the application is
misconceived and is liable to be dismissed.
4. Later on reply/rejoinder W-12 has been filed by the workmen with strong denial of the counter allegations
leveled in the objection filed by the management, reiterating the pleas taken in the petition filed by him.
5. The workman has filed affidavit alongwith annexures. He has been cross examined on behalf of the
management.
6. The management has filed affidavit of Smt. Rafat Mehmooda M-25, Dr. Idris Ahmed, M-29, Waseem
Ahmed, M-40 and Dr. Mohd. Arshad, M-41.
7. With the consent of both the parties certified photo copies of cross examination of Dr. M.Arshad and Idris
Ahmad have been filed in this case.
8. Perusal of the record reveals that the conduct of the management has been very careless and lethargic, and
on several occasions matter was taken ex-parte but on the request of the opposite party, the ex-parte order
was recalled. However, the cost imposed by the Court was not paid to the workman and the official of the
management or the Learned AR of the management refrained themselves to appear and to participate in
the proceeding of the case. Again several dates were fixed, so as to give more opportunity to the opposite
party to participate in the process of dispensation of justice but the management and its officers have been
very negligent, and the officials and the Learned AR abstained themselves for the reasons best known to
them. Undoubtedly, proceedings can not be lingered on endlessly or perpetually without any cogent and
genuine reason. Under these circumstances the arguments of the Learned AR of the workman were heard
at length and record has been scanned thoroughly.
9. The main allegations of the workman is that during the pendency of the connected I.D. 110/02 which has
arisen with reference to the Schedule dated 25.06.2002 referred by the Govt. of India to this Tribunal for
adjudication, the opposite party has with malafide intention stopped to take work from the petitioner
workman w.e.f. 23.01.2004, the so called contradiction in the petition regarding the date of stoppage of
work has been duly explained by the workman. The petitioner has elaborated that on intervention made by
the ALC ( C ) the workman alongwith other colleagues was taken back in service and later on he was
retrenched from 23.01.2004, as a consequence of stoppage of work.
10. The management witness Dr. M.Idris in his cross examination (recorded in I.D. 110/02 has admitted that
he had not perused any record pertaining to the workman/labourer). However, he has given name of 5
persons working in the Herb Garden w.e.f. 2007 to 2015. Other management witness Sri Idris Ahmad in
his cross examination (recorded in I.D. 110/02) has admitted in para 7 that the concerned petitioners have
worked in the department as daily wagers and relevant muster roll should have been there in the
concerned department.
11. The management has failed to corroborate its version that the petitioner had not worked beyond
12.07.2000. Learned AR for the workman has emphatically asserted that the petitioner has continued to
work till 22.01.2004.
12. Another material fact has been brought to the notice of the Court. The case no. MW 231 to 234 of 2000,
under the Minimum Wages Act. was adjudicated in favour of the workman vide order dated 06.07.2005
wherein the management has directed to ensure the payment of the compensation etc. to the applicants
and other workmen in the respective cases. Any evidence by the opposite party to contradict this judgment
has not been filed. The management did not produce the muster roll and the attendance register before the
Competent Authority.
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
4003
13. After having heard the learned AR for the workman and perusal of the record available before the Court,
it is inferred that the alleged termination of service of the applicant w.e.f. 23.01.2004 during the pendency
of the connected I.D. 110/02, can not be adjudged as legal or justified. Provisions of Section 33 A of the
I.D. Act. are mandatory in nature and it has to be followed in letter and spirit. The aforesaid
termination is set aside, and petitioner is entited for his reinstatement alongwith full back wages.
The arrear due, shall be paid by the management within 10 weeks, from the date of notification of
the Award, failing which the petitioner will also be entitled to get interest @ 6% per annum.
Petition dated 06.04.2005 is disposed accordingly.
14. Award as above.
RAKESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer
Lucknow,
01.05.2018
ubZ fnYyh] 21 ebZ] 2018
dk-vk- 834-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj] ÝySV
vf/dkjh] deka¯Mx bu phiQ] osLVuZ usoy] eqacbZ ,oa muds deZpkjh vkSj vU; ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds
chp vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,pa Je U;k;ky;] u- II] eqacbZ iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k
CGIT-2/16 of 2013) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18-04-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&14011@11@2012&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)º
jktsUnz tks'kh] mi funs'kd
New Delhi, the 21st May, 2018
S.O. 834.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (CGIT-2/16 of 2013) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court No. II, Mumbai as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to
the Flat Officer, Commanding in Chief, Western Naval, Mumbai and their workmen & Others, which was received by
the Central Government on 18.04.2018.
[No. L-14011/11/2012-IR (DU)]
RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.2, MUMBAI
PRESENT: M. V. Deshpande, Presiding Officer
REFERENCE NO. CGIT-2/16 of 2013
EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF
COMMANDING IN CHIEF, WESTERN NAVAL COMMAND
The Flat Officer,
Commanding in Chief, Western Naval
Command, Shahid Bhagat Singh Road,
Fort, Mumbai – 400 023.
AND
THEIR WORKMEN.
The General Secretary,
Indian Naval Emp. Union,
12/14, Rajgir Chambers, R. No. 60,
7th Fl., Shahid Bhagat Singh Road,
Opp. Old Custom House, Mumbai – 400 023.
APPEARANCES:
FOR THE EMPLOYER
:
Mr. N. J. Gonsalves, Advocate
FOR THE WORKMEN
:
Mr. J. H. Sawant, Advocate
Mumbai, dated the 12th March, 2018
4004
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
AWARD
1.
This is reference made by the Central Government in exercise of powers under clause (d) of sub-section (1)
and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 vide Government of India, Ministry of Labour
& Employment, New Delhi vide its order No. L-14011/11/2012 – IR (DU) dated 07.03.2013. The terms of reference
given in the schedule are as follows :
“Whether the action of the management of the Flat Officer, Commanding in Chief Western Naval Command,
Mumbai in denying the promotion to Shri H. G. Gund, Skilled Tradesman to Highly Skilled Tradesman in the
year 2004-05 is legal, just and proper ? If not, what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?”
2.
After the receipt of the reference, both the parties were served with the notices. They appeared through their
respective representatives.
3.
Second party filed statement of claim Ex.7. According to the second party, the concerned workman was
Skilled Tradesman working in the establishment of first party in its Naval Transport Pool. On the basis of seniority as
well as suitability he was eligible for consideration and grant of promotion to the grade of Highly Skilled Tradesman
against the vacancy that arose on and from 21.7.04. However, the first party instead of granting him said promotion to
the grade of Highly Skilled Tradesman against the said vacancy, granted promotion to Shri N.C. Panchal, Skilled
Tradesman to the grade of Highly Skilled Tradesman despite of the fact that Shri Panchal was junior in service to the
concerned workman and the concerned workman was found fit for the said promotion in the year 1993 itself.
4.
It is also the contention of the second party that the concerned workman was informed that his claim for
promotion in the grade of Highly Skilled Tradesman on or from 21.7.04 was not considered by the Departmental
Promotion Committee [DPC] in view of low assessment in accordance with para 6 of DPC instructions read with
DoPT’s office Memorandum dt. 28.3.06.
5.
According to the concerned workman it was obligatory on the part of first party to inform the second party
periodically of low marks or any adverse remarks in the ACR in order to give second party an opportunity to make
necessary improvement in his work so that he should not be condemned unheard and deprived of the promotion. The
first party never informed to the second party of any deficiencies in the work and therefore the adverse remarks noted
in his ACR cannot be used against him to deprive him from the promotion in the grade of Highly Skilled Tradesman.
Second party workman is therefore entitled to be promoted and placed in the grade of Highly Skilled Tradesman w.e.f.
21.7.04 with all consequential benefits with retrospective effect. Second party workman is therefore asking to declare
that the action of the first party in denying promotion to him in the grade of Highly Skilled Tradesman w.e.f. 21.7.04 is
illegal, unjust and improper.
6.
First party management resisted claim by filing written statement Ex.8 contending therein that the concerned
workman was not promoted to the grade of Highly Skilled Tradesman due to his low merit during the period from
1.4.96 to 31.3.02 due to assessment of individual below the bench mark in ACRs or DPCs for the year 1996-97 to
2002-03, concerned workman Shri H.G. Gund was not considered for promotion to the grade of Highly Skilled
Tradesman.
7.
It is then contended that para 6 of DPC instructions read with DoPT order dt. 10.4.89 a person whose
assessment is below bench mark of “good” cannot be included in the select list. Shri Panchal was promoted instead of
concerned workman whose merit rating was considered undistinguished on that occasion.
8.
It is then contended that overall grading given in ACR were not communicated because as per existing
instructions at the time of promotion of shri Panchal the overall grading recorded in ACR has not to be changed in any
way even after the expunction of adverse remark either fully or partially by the competent authority. Hence action of
management is in conformity and in accordance with the then in vogue DoPT instructions contained in office
memorandum dt. 10.4.89. The first party management thus prayed for rejection of reference.
9.
Following issues are framed at Ex.9. I reproduce the issues along with my findings thereon for the reasons to
follow:
Sr. No.
Issues
Findings
1
Whether the action of the management in denying the promotion to the
Workman Shri H.G. Gund, Skilled Tradesman to Highly Skilled
Tradesman w.e.f. 21.7.04 is legal, just and proper ?
No
2.
What relief the workmen are entitled to ?
As per final order
3.
What order ?
As per final order
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
4005
Reasons
Issue No.1.
10.
It seems to be admitted position that the second party workman was not promoted to the grade of Highly
Skilled Tradesman on the basis of assessment of individual ACRs for DPC years 1996-97, 97-98, 98-99, 2001-02. It
also seems to be admitted position that as per DPC instructions read with DoPT office memorandum No. F22011/5/86-
Estt. (D) dated 10.4.89, a person whose assessment is below mark of “good” cannot be included in the select list. It
also seems to be an admitted position that on complaint by the concerned workman he was informed that his claim for
promotion in the grade of Highly Skilled Tradesman on and from 27.4.04 was not considered by the DPC in view of
low assessment in accordance with para 6 of DPC instructions read with DoPT office memorandum dt. 28.3.06.
Therefore the question is whether there was any written communication to the concerned workman regarding grading
of the concerned workman as average or otherwise as regards to his performance.
11.
I say so because such communication is necessary in order to have an opportunity to the concerned workman
to improve his performance. Even as per office memorandum dt. 28.3.06 it was obligatory on the part of first party to
inform the second party periodically of low marks or any adverse remarks in his ACR in order to give the second party
workman an opportunity to make necessary improvement in his work so that he should not be condemned unheard and
deprived of the promotion to any higher grade.
12.
For it is explicit from the glaring admission given by Vijendra Singh, the witness of the first party that there
was no written communication to the second party workman regarding the grading of the second party as average or
otherwise in respect of his performance. He admits that there was no communication to the second party regarding
grading given to him in his ACR. If that is so then it can be said that no opportunity was given to the second party
before denying promotion to him and denying such promotion without giving any opportunity is like a punishment for
misconduct which cannot be imposed without following procedure and also following principles of natural justice.
13.
Learned Counsel for the concerned workman submitted that if the rating of the concerned was below average
then it was incumbent upon the management to communicate that assessment of his work to the concerned workman.
Since that was not done then it can be said that no opportunity was given to the concerned workman to submit the
representation against the said remark / entries in respect of the marks given. In the context he seeks to rely on the
decision in case of Dev Dutt V/S. Union of India & Ors. AIR 2008 (SC 2513) wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court has
concluded that every entry in ACR of the public servant must be communicated to him within the reasonable period
whether it is poor, fair, average, good or very good. The Hon’ble Apex Court has observed in para 17 & 18 of the
judgment that,
“In our opinion, every entry in the A.C.R. of a public servant must be communicated to him within a
reasonable period, whether it is a poor, fair, average, good or very good entry. This is because non-
communication of such an entry may adversely affect the employee in two ways : (1) Had the entry been
communicated to him he would know about the assessment of his work and conduct by his superiors, which
would enable him to improve his work in future (2) He would have an opportunity of making a representation
against the entry if he feels it is unjustified, and pray for its upgradation. Hence non-communication of an
entry is arbitrary, and it has been held by the Constitution Bench decision of this Court in Maneka Gandhi vs.
Union of India (supra) that arbitrariness violates Article 14 of the Constitution.
Thus it is not only when there is a benchmark but in all cases that an entry (whether it is poor, fair, average,
good or very food) must be communicated to a public servant, otherwise there is violation of the principle of
fairness, which is the soul of natural justice. Even an outstanding entry should be communicated since that
would boost the morale of the employee and make him work harder.”
14.
Learned Counsel for the concerned workman has also relied on the decision in case of Sukhdev Singh V/S.
Union of India in Civil Appeal No. 5892/2006 wherein the Hon’ble Apex Court while referring to the decision in case
of Dev Dutt V/S. Union of India & Ors. has concluded that every entry in ACR of public servant must be
communicated to him / her within the reasonable period. The Hon’ble Apex Court thus observed that even in cases
there is no bench mark laid down by the authorities for promotion, non-communication of entries in the ACR of the
public servant is arbitrary because it deprive the concerned employee on making representation against it and praying
for its upgradation. Every entry in the ACR of every employee under the State whether he is civil, judicial, police or
other service (except Military) must be communicated to him so as to enable him to make the representation against it
because non communication deprive the employee of the opportunity of making representation against it which may
affect his chance of being promoted. Hence the non-communication is arbitrary and violative of article 14 of the
Constitution.
15.
In view of this legal position it was necessary for the first party management to communicate the assessment
of the concerned workman to him before denying promotion when as a matter of fact he was not considered for
4006
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
promotion on the ground that assessment of the concerned workman was below bench mark in ACRs for DPC years
1996-97 to 2002-03. It will have to be said therefore that he was not given an opportunity to make representation in
respect of assessment of his work. In view of that action of denying promotion to him is illegal.
16.
In view of that it will be open to the concerned workman to make representation to the first party management
for retrospective promotion in view of legal position cited supra. If such representation is made by the concerned
workman, the same shall be considered by the first party appropriately in accordance with law. If the upgradation is
allowed from 21.7.04, the first party should consider forthwith for his promotion as Highly Skilled Tradesman from
21.7.04 retrospectively. If he is promoted from 21.7.04 then he will be entitled to get the benefit of balance of arrears
of pay along with 8% per annum interest and other consequential benefits. Issue No.1 is therefore answered
accordingly as indicated against it.
Issue No.2 & 3.
17.
In view of my findings to Issue No.1, I find that the concerned workman is entitled to relief to some extent as
per final order. Thus the order.
ORDER
1.
It is declared that the action of first party in denying promotion to the concerned workman Shri H.G.
Gund from Skilled Tradesman to Highly Skilled Tradesman w.e.f. 21.7.04 is unjustified and improper.
2.
It is open to the concerned workman to make representation to the concerned authorities for
retrospective promotion and if such representation is made by him, the same shall be considered by the concerned
authorities appropriately in accordance with law.
3.
If the representation is allowed the concerned workman should be considered forthwith for promotion
retrospectively w.e.f. 21.7.04 and if he is promoted, he will get the balance of arrears of pay along with 8% per
annum interest and other consequential benefits from 21.7.04.
M.V. DESHPANDE, Presiding Officer
Dated
12.3.2018
ubZ fnYyh] 21 ebZ] 2018
dk-vk- 835-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj]
v?;{k&lg&izca/ funs'kd] bZ-lh-th-lh- fyfeVsM] eqacbZ ,oa muds deZpkjh vkSj vU; ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds
deZdkjksa ds chp vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] u- II] eqacbZ iapkV
(lanHkZ la[;k CGIT-2/10 of 2012) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18-04-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&42011@197@2011&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)º
jktsUnz tks'kh] mi funs'kd
New Delhi, the 21st May, 2018
S.O. 835.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (CGIT-2/10 of 2012) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court No. II, Mumbai as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to
the Chairman-cum-Managing Director, E.C.G.C. Ltd., Mumbai and their workmen & others, which was received by
the Central Government on 18.04.2018.
[No. L-42011/197/2011-IR (DU)]
RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.2, MUMBAI
PRESENT: M. V. Deshpande, Presiding Officer
REFERENCE NO.CGIT-2/10 of 2012
EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF
E. C. G. C. LTD.
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
4007
The Chairman-cum-Managing Director,
E. C. G. C. Ltd.,
Express Towers, 10th Fl.,
Jamuna Lal Bajaj Marg, Nariman Point,
Mumbai – 400 021.
AND
THEIR WORKMEN.
The General Secretary,
Mumbai Port Trust General Workers Union,
1st Floor, Kavarana Building,
26/4, P. D. Mello Road, Wadi Bunder, Mumbai.
APPEARANCES:
FOR THE EMPLOYER
:
Mr. Anees Patel, Adv. i/b. Ambalal & Co.
FOR THE WORKMEN
:
Mr. V. Narayanan, Advocate
Mumbai, dated the 9th March, 2018.
AWARD
1.
This is reference made by the Central Government in exercise of powers under clause (d) of sub-section (1)
and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 vide Government of India, Ministry of Labour
& Employment, New Delhi vide its order No. L-42011/197/2011 – IR (DU) dated 27.02.2012. The terms of reference
given in the schedule are as follows :
“Whether the demand of Mumbai Port Trust Workers Union for regularization of the services of Shri Santosh
B. Surve & 13 other drivers (as per list enclosed) in the establishment of Export Credit Guarantee
Corporation of India Ltd., Mumbai is legal and justified ? What relief the workman is entitled to ?“
2.
After the receipt of the reference, both the parties were served with the notices. They appeared through their
respective representatives.
3.
Second party union filed statement of claim Ex.5. According to the second party union, the concerned
workmen are employed as drivers for Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd. The activities of the first party
company including among other things export oriented company charge free for various services rendered. The
company’s Board of Directors includes among others Joint Secretary, Ministry of Commerce as Chairman-cum-
Managing Director, Joint Director, Ministry of Finance, Executive Director of R.B.I. and many others. The company is
also controlled & supervised by the Govt. of India, Ministry of Commerce.
4.
It is then case of the concerned workmen that they have been working for the company as their direct
employees on casual basis without any break in service and with the hope that the company would consider their
request for regularization. The workmen themselves and through various other unions made repeated attempts to get
their services regularized. The workmen cause was agitated by MbPT General workers union. However, due to non-
cooperative attitude of the management no settlement was possible and the matter ended in failure. RLC’s office was
pleased to send the failure report. The Ministry of Labour thereafter passed an order referring the above matter for
adjudication to this tribunal.
5.
It is thus contention of the concerned workmen that they were working as drivers for senior Executives of the
Corporation on full time basis. The vehicles drivers used to drive are owned by the Corporation. The Petrol,
maintenance etc. of these vehicles are spent from Corporation fund. When Executive is transferred from one branch to
another and other Executive is replaced in that place, the same driver continues to work. These drivers are given proper
I-cards by the Corporation. However, the drivers are not paid the salary at par with regular drivers working in the
Corporation and other benefits & allowances including PF, gratuity, bonus, washing allowances etc. Even then during
entire period of services of the concerned workmen with the Corporation, there is no complaint of their work, conduct,
character etc. and no complaint of any sort was ever received by them from the Executives and their family members.
They have thus worked for full satisfaction of the Corporation.
6.
It is then case of the union that due to request for regularization and taking up the matter through RLC,
through MbPT workers union, one of the workers Mr. Santosh Baburao Surve, who was working continuously for the
Corporation as driver from 30.8.97 would abruptly & arbitrarily terminated on 30.4.11 from service without any reason
4008
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
and without following any procedure. 7 other workmen were also regularized by the Corporation through back door
entry.
7.
According to the union, there exists regular work. There are many vacancies available for the post of drivers.
Many recruitments were made. Many employees were regularized. The concerned workmen performed the same kind
of work as the workmen directly employed by the principal employer. In view of that the concerned workmen are also
eligible for regularization and to receive regular wages that of the regular drivers engaged by the management.
8.
It is also the case of the concerned workmen that they are attending the perennial nature of work of the
management against the vacant post of drivers for considerable period of time but Corporation refused to regularize
these employees and refused to extend the benefits. The union is therefore asking for declaration to the effect that the
action of the management in not regularizing or absorbing the services of the concerned workmen with effect from their
joining services and discontinuation of service of driver Mr. Santosh Surve from 30.4.11 is illegal and unjustified.
They are also asking for giving directions to the management to regularize / absorb them in the capacity of permanent
drivers with effect from their joining the services of the management Corporation with all consequential benefits.
9.
First party management resisted claim by filing written statement Ex.8 contending therein that there is no
employer employee relationship between the Corporation and the concerned workmen. In the absence of master
servant relationship between the company and the said drivers the question of regularization of the services of the
concerned workmen as regular drivers does not arise.
10.
It is the case of the management that as a part of service conditions the senior Executives and branch
Managers are provided with only vehicles for their official as well as personal use. However, no drivers are provided
to these senior Executives and branch Managers by the company as they are not entitled for the privilege under
prevailing corporate policy. Senior Executives and branch Managers who have been allotted with the official vehicles
are eligible to engage the services of the drivers on their own and claim permissible reimbursement subject to limitation
stipulated in the company policy. The reimbursement are allotted on written declaration by the concerned officer
confirming the amount of actual expenses not exceeding the limits incurred by him on account of engagement of the
personal drivers. To engage a personal driver or not is at the sole discretion of the concerned executive. Personal
drivers engaged by the senior Executives and branch Managers have no connection whatsoever with the company.
There is no contract of service exists expressed or implied between the company and these drivers. The drivers are not
working under the supervision & control of the company. The salary, allowances, working hours and other service
conditions of the personal drivers are decided by the respective senior Executives and branch Managers and the
company has no role to play in these matters. These drivers are not interviewed, recommended or appointed by the
company. The company has neither obtained formal applications for jobs or recorded their personal information. As
such there is no privy of the contract between the company and these drivers. These drivers are never been given any
appointment letter by the company. As such drivers were never appointed as regular employees in accordance with
recruitment policy or selection procedure of the public sector undertaking.
11.
According to the management, company never issued any appointment letter to these drivers nor their names
are entered in the muster roll of the company. No service conditions of the company are applicable to them. They are
never been workmen of the company. As such there is no employer employee relationship between the concerned
workmen and the first party company.
12.
It is also case of the management that the other workmen whose services are regularized are the regular
employees of the company and their services were regularized till 2009 in a phased manner purely in accordance with
the procedure and policy of the company. So far concerned workmen, they cannot be equated to the regular employees
of the company since the terms & conditions of the engagement of the said employees are totally different. In the
absence of employer employee relationship there is no question of absorbing the concerned workmen in the services of
the company. It has thus sought the dismissal of the reference.
13.
Following issues are framed at Ex.9. I reproduce the issues along with my findings thereon for the reasons to
follow:
Sr. No.
Issues
Findings
1
Whether the demand of second party for regularization of the services of
Shri Santosh B. Surve and 13 other Drivers is legal and proper ?
No
2.
Whether the workmen under reference are entitled to be absorbed in the
service ?
No
3.
What relief the workmen are entitled to ?
No
4.
What order ?
As per final order
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
4009
Reasons
Issue No.1& 2.
14.
It is well settled principle of law that the person who sets up a plea of existence of relationship of employer
and employee the burden would be upon him. The burden of proof being the workmen to establish employer employee
relationship is on the workmen and therefore no adverse inference can be drawn against the employer that if he would
have produced the documents then the documents would have been proved employer employee relation. As per settled
position where the person asserts that he was the workmen of the company and it is denied by the company, it is for the
concerned workmen to prove the fact. It is not for the company to prove that he was not an employee of the company
but of some other person. The question whether relation between the parties is one of the employer & employee is a
pure question of fact. This is precisely the question of fact which has to be considered while deciding this issue on the
basis of evidence of the parties concerned.
15.
So far contentions go, it is the contention of the concerned workmen that they were working as drivers for the
senior Executives of the Corporation on full time basis. It is their contention that they are the direct employees of the
Corporation since the vehicle drivers used to drive are owned by the Corporation and petrol, maintenance etc. of these
vehicles are spent from the Corporation fund and even after the Executive is transferred the same driver continues to
work.
16.
As against this, it is the contention of the first party that the senior Executives and branch Managers have been
allotted with the official vehicles. They are eligible to engage the services of the drivers on their own and claim
permissible reimbursement. In view of this even it is admitted that the vehicles, drivers used to drive own by the
Corporation, the concerned drivers cannot claim their direct relationship as employer employee with the Corporation.
It is because it is not unusual for public sector undertaking to give allowances to its highly level officers leaving to
them to engage the services of the drivers or others for fulfilling the needs for which the allowances are meant. There
is nothing on record to make out the nexus between the Corporation and the concerned drivers. There is nothing on
record to indicate that control & directions of the drivers vested in the Corporation. In the absence of material to make
out that the concerned drivers were employed by the Corporation & was under its directions and control, were paid the
salary by the Corporation or otherwise were included in the army of employees of Corporation. It cannot be assumed
that there exists employer employee relationship between the Corporation and the concerned employees.
17.
On going through the record, it is clear that the concerned workmen have not adduced evidence nor filed
documents on record to prove their claim. Union remained absent and therefore in the absence of union, evidence of
the concerned workmen it will have to be said that the concerned workmen have not established that they are direct
employees of the company having controlled by the company and were paid by the company itself.
18.
Learned Counsel for the first party company pointed out that the contractor had agreed to provide car drivers
to the first party company in return for a fixed consideration. 7 of the drivers continued to be engaged as drivers of the
first party officials through the contractor and rest 7 drivers had already left the job. That would again show that the
concerned workmen were the employees of the contractor and as such there was no master servant relationship between
the first party company and the concerned drivers.
19.
Even then the concerned drivers have come out a case that 7 workmen were regularized through back door
entry by the management and this fact was brought to the notice before the ALC [C]. Contention is also to the fact that
many other vacancies are available for the post of drivers. Many recruitments are made, many employees are
regularized and in the circumstances it was for the Corporation to consider the services of the concerned workmen who
performed the same kind of work as the workmen, who are directly employed by the principal employer.
20.
Again the same finding holds good to consider that there is no iota of evidence or material on record to show
that there exists vacancies which were filled by the Corporation and as such there was discrimination while making the
appointments of the permanent drivers. In the absence of evidence, all these contentions of the concerned workmen
shall fall out.
21.
For want of evidence it will have to be said that the concerned workmen are not entitled for regularization of
the services. Their demand is not legal & proper. They are not entitled to be absorbed in service as they have not
established employer employee relationship in between them and the Corporation, the first party No.1. The above
issues are therefore answered accordingly as indicated against each of them in terms of above observations.
4010
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Issue No.3 & 4.
22.
In view of my findings to the issues, the workmen are not entitled to any relief. Hence the order.
ORDER
Reference is rejected with no order as to costs.
M.V. DESHPANDE, Presiding Officer
Dated,
09.3.2018.
ubZ fnYyh] 21 ebZ] 2018
dk-vk- 836-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj] Mkd?kj ds
v/h{kd] Mkd foHkkx] lqjsanzuxj (xqtjkr) ,oa muds deZpkjh ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqcaèk esa
fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k lhthvkbZVh,-
37/2013) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 23-04-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&40011@24@2012&vkbZvkj (Mh-;w-)º
jktsUnz tks'kh] mi funs'kd
New Delhi, the 21st May, 2018
S.O. 836.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. CGITA-37/2013) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Ahmedabad, as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the
Superintendent of Post Offices, Department of Posts, Surendranagar (Gujarat) and their workman, which was received
by the Central Government on 23.04.2018.
[No. L-40011/24/2012-IR (DU)]
RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present: Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,
Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,
Ahmedabad, Dated 03rd April, 2018
Reference: (CGITA) No- 37/2013
The Supdt. Of Post Offices,
Department of Posts,
Surendranagar Division,
Near Tower, 2nd Floor,
Surendranagar (Gujarat) – 363001
…First Party/Opponent
V/s
The President,
Association of Railway and Post Employees,
15, Shashi Apartments,
Bhatta Cross Road, Vasna,
Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380007
…Second Party/Applicant
For the First Party No
:
Shri P.M. Rami
For the Second Party :
Shri R.C. Pathak
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
4011
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-40011/
24/2012–IR(DU) dated 25.02.2013 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad
(Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of Superintendent of Post Offices, Surendranagar Division,
Surendranagar in withdrawing temporary status given to Shri Manubhai V. Rajgorw.e.f. 13.01.2011 is
justified? If not, what benefit Shri M.V. Rajgor is entitled on the basis of his services given to the
management?”
1. The reference dates back to 25.02.2013. The applicant/workman submitted the statement of claim Ex. 5
alleging that the applicant/workman was engaged as causal labour by the opposite party Superintendent of
Post Offices, Surendranagar Division, Surendranagar, since 01.09.1985 and he has been performing his duties
for 8 hours a day continuously with satisfaction to the opposite party with artificial rates to deprive him from
his legal rights in the service. The opposite party issued him an appointment letter to be appointed as EDA and
reduced his salary for 4 hours a day despite the fact that he was performing his duties for 8½ hours a day. He
has been continuously making request to be given the benefits of Group D, TS etc. The opposite party forcibly
took an undertaking which is nullity while granting the benefits of Group D vide office order dated
03/04.12.2009 and he was permitted to join the duty as Group D at Limbdi w.e.f. 10.12.2009. He has further
alleged that the opposite party withdrew his benefits of Group D and his salary was reduced from Rs. 8323/- to
Rs. 6344/- vide order dated 15.01.2011. The applicant/workman made the representation on 30.08.2011 and
01.06.2012 but to not result. Thus he has prayed for setting aside the order dated 13(15).01.2011 and has
prayed for grant of temporary status to the workman.
2. The opposite party submitted the written statement Ex. 6 denying the allegations made in the statement of
claim submitting that it is incorrect to say that he had been working 8 hours a day from 01.09.1985 to
15.12.1988. The submission of the applicant/workman is not correct and true. His submission regarding
engagement 8 hours daily from 01.09.1985 to 15.12.1988 is also not correct. As no recruitment/procedure was
observed while engaging the applicant. He was engaged in piecemeal basis against leave/vacancy of Group D
cadre and was engaged as outsider on rate applicable to casual labour as per the prevailing arrangement to
manage the work through short term leave/absentee’s arrangement of the regular Group D employee of
Sudamada SO. The opposite party further alleged that the submission of workman/applicant regarding
artificial break and appointment order as EDA and for reduced salary for 4 hours daily and as paying salary
for 4 hours only by the management and reported technique for depriving the right of the workman/applicant
etc. are not correct and true. The truth is that the workman was engaged as outsider/casual labour at Sudamada
SO vice Group D in short term leave/absentee during the year 1988. The post of GDS/MD-MC was created
w.e.f. 31.03.1989 at Ninama BO (under Sudamada SO). The local notification was issued by SDI(P) Limbdi to
fill up the post and copy of the same were given to all concerned i.e. Employment Exchange, Surendranagar,
Sarpanch, Talati cum Mantri, Head Master Primary School Ninama College etc. M.V. Rajgor applied for the
same and was selected for the post by the then SDI(P) and appointed at Limbdi vide Memo No.
PF/EDCA/DA/Ninama dated 03.07.1990. M.V. Rajgor is still working as GDS/MD-MC Ninama BO. Thus,
contention of the applicant is not correct that his duty hours were reduced from 8 hours to 4 hours by the
management. The opposite party further alleged that it is also not correct and true that he was performing duty
of 8 hours, prior to appointment in GDS/MD-MC Ninama BO w.e.f. 31.03.1989. In fact, in connection with to
grant of temporary status in Group D cadre vide application dated 21.11.2008 of the applicant was forwarded
to PMG Rajkot and as per PMG Rajkot letter No. R&E/2/MDC/2008 dated 28.04.2008/01.12.2008; it was
directed to decide the case at Divisional level being a Group D cadre case. The case was again refer to RO
Rajkot vide No. B2/Reptn/Misc/08 dated 08.02.2009 and the case again returned vide dated
R&E/2/MDC/2008 directing to decide the case at Divisional level. Therefore, the case was decided by the then
Superintendent of Post Offices, Surendranagar and granted temporary status in Group D cadre to the applicant
vide No. B2/Casual Labour/Ty. Status/9-10 dated 03.04.2009. Therefore, it was asked to RO Rajkot vide letter
no. STA-2/Rig-20/Corr/2009 dated 09.04.2009 to intimate the reason for granting temporary status, followed
by reminder dated 13.10.2010. A detailed report was submitted to the PMG Rajkot vide no. B2/Casual
Labour/Ty. Status/9-10 dated 23.10.2010. It was directed vide RO Rajkot letter no. STA-2/Rlg/20/Corr/2010
dated 11.01.2011 to cancel the orders of granting temporary status of M.V. Rajgor and to restore the status
quo. Therefore, the order of granted temporary status to Group D cadre dated 03.04.2009 was cancelled vide
no. B2/Cancel Labour/Ty. Status/09-10 dated 12.01.2011 and relieved the application for his post w.e.f.
15.01.2011. That temporary status was granted by the then SPOs Surendranagar in accordance with The
4012
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Directorate, New Delhi letter no. 45-95/8-SPB-1 dated 12.04.1991, further circulated under RO Rajkot Memo
NO. STA-2/PDR/Rlg-20/90 dated 30.04.1991. The applicant/workman never recruited in Group D cadre, after
observing due formalities under departmental rules and regulation for regular vacancy of Group D cadre, he
was engaged to manage the work for short term against leave/absentee of Group D, with clear instruction that,
there will be no claim for regular appointment/absorption in the Group D cadre. The allegation regarding
reduction of pay from Rs. 8323/- to Rs. 6344/- is also hereby denied and far from the truth. The applicant
engagement in GDS/MD-MC Ninama BO (under Sudamada SO) after observing due formalities of
recruitment in GDS cadre as per notification. M.V. Rajgor was applied for that post and was selected in
GDS/MD-MC at Ninama PO. There is no relevancy of prior engagement in Group D in short term
engagement at Sudamada SO with appointment as GDS/MD-MC Ninama BO in this case. Also the nature of
work of casual labour, Group D and GDS MD Ninama BO is quite different and hence allegations of the
workman are quite misleading one. The demand of the applicant for absorption in Group D cadre or to grant
the temporary status in Group D cadre has no merit. The applicant belongs to the GDS category and appointed
as GDS/MD Ninama BO (Sudamada SO) since 31.03.1989. His representation to grant of temporary status has
also no merit as per the instruction of the Directorates Memo No. 45-95/8-PSB-1 dated 12.04.1991 is
applicable to casual labour only not to GDS category. There are certain rules and regulations for recruitment
of Group D cadre. The applicant was not fulfilled the required qualification/eligibility for the Group D cadre
and therefore, his case is not admissible. The temporary status granted vides Office Memo No. B2/Casual
Labour/Ty. Status/10-11 dated 03.05.2009 was cancelled vide letter No. even dated 12.01.2011 in accordance
with PMG Rajkot Memo No. STA-2/Rlg-20/Corr./2010 dated 11.11.2011. The representation dated
31.01.2011 against the order of termination of temporary status to the DPS Rajkot was rejected as he was not
in employment as casual labour on 29.11.1989. Therefore, the applicant has represented to the PMG Rajkot
vide his application dated 17.05.2011 and same was rejected by PMG, Rajkot vide Memo No. STA-02/Rlg-
20/Corr/2011 dated 01.08.2011 that “The action of SPO Surendranagar to confer temporary status to Rajgor
was not in order, as he was not working as casual labour on 29.11.1989”. The request application dated
30.08.2011 addressed to the CPMG, Ahmedabad was not decided due to pending application with ALC,
Gandhidham in accordance with C.O. Memo No. STA/44-29/R/Corr/2012 dated 27.08.2012 and now pending
with CGIT, Ahmedabad. The opponent office is the office of the post department and as such it is not covered
under the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
3. On the basis of the pleadings, the following issues arise:
I.
Whether the action of the management of Superintendent of Post Offices, Surendranagar Division,
Surendranagar in withdrawing temporary status given to Manubhai V. Rajgor w.e.f. 13.01.2011 is
justified?
II.
To what benefit, if any, M.V. Rajgor is entitled on the basis of his services given to the management?
4. Both these issues are interrelated and are decided together.
5. Issue No. I and II: The burden of proof of these issues was lying on the workman who submitted his affidavit
Ex. 8 wherein he has reiterated the averments made in the statement of claim and has not said anything
contrary in his cross-examination. The opposite party filed the affidavit Ex. 9 of his witness Dilip Kumar
Mohan Lal Bhavsar who has also reiterated the averments made in the written statement Ex. 6 but in his cross-
examination, he has stated that temporary status was granted by one Atul Kumar Tiwari, the then
Superintendent of Post Office, Surendranagar without following the due procedure. The department after
deducting this irregularity did not take any action against Atul Kumar Tiwari. N.B. Kundari withdrew the
temporary status of this workman as no Departmental Promotion Committee was formed and there was not
such recommendation in the case of workman. It is true that no show-cause notice was given to the workman.
This workman moved a representation against demotion and withdrawal of temporary status which was
replaced before Reconciliation Officer. After withdrawal of temporary status on 11.01.2011, Departmental
Promotion Committee was held but he stated that he doesn’t remember the date of Departmental Promotion
Committee. This workman was considered in the next Departmental Promotion Committee as the workman
attained the age of 50 years but he doesn’t know the date of birth of this workman. Thus the cross-examination
reveals that the opposite party has failed to explain as to why this applicant/workman was not considered in
the next Departmental Promotion Committee and secondly, as to what action was taken against the then errant
Superintendent of Post Office who granted the temporary status to the applicant without following the due
procedure. The witness has also failed to explain as to what action was taken on the representation made by
the applicant/workman after withdrawal of the temporary status. Thus the cross-examination of the witness
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
4013
does not justify the withdrawal of the temporary status of the applicant/workman. Thus in the light of the
aforesaid evidence, I come to the conclusion that the withdrawal of temporary status of applicant/workman
Manubhai V. Rajgor was not justified and liable to be quashed and set aside. Thus the Issue No. I is decided in
negative and against the opposite party.
6. On the basis of the aforesaid findings, the order dated 13.01.2011 passed by Superintendent of Post Office,
Surendranagar Division regarding the withdrawal of the temporary status of the applicant/workman was
unjustified. The applicant/workman is entitled for the temporary status from the date it was withdrawn i.e.
13.01.2011.
7. The reference is disposed of accordingly. The first party is directed to restore temporary status of the
applicant/workman Manubhai V. Rajgor from the date it was withdrawn. The award shall be given effect
within 60 days from the publication of this award.
P.K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 21 ebZ] 2018
dk-vk- 837-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj] iQSDVjh
eSustj] jktuxj VsDlVkby feYl fyfeVsM] vgenkckn (xqtjkr) ,oa muds deZpkjh ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds
deZdkjksa ds chp vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn iapkV
(lanHkZ la[;k lhthvkbZVh,-33/2016) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 02-04-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&42012@47@2016&vkbZvkj (Mh-;w-)º
jktsUnz tks'kh] mi funs'kd
New Delhi, the 21st May, 2018
S.O. 837.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. CGITA-33/2016) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum
Labour Court, Ahmedabad, as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the
Factory Manager, Rajnagar Textile Mills Ltd., Ahmedabad (Gujarat) and their workman, which was received by the
Central Government on 02.04.2018.
[No. L-42012/47/2016-IR (DU)]
RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present: Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,
Presiding Officer, CGIT cum Labour Court,
Ahmedabad, Dated 07th March, 2018
Reference: (CGITA) No- 33/2016
The Factory Manager,
Rajnagar Textile Mills Ltd. (A Unit of NTC),
Babupura Haripura, Asarwa,
Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380016
…First Party
V/s
Shri Ashok Parmar and others,
C/o Factory Manager,
Rajnagar Textiles Mills Ltd.,
Babupura Haripura, Asarwa,
Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
…Second Party
For the First Party : None
For the Second Party : None
4014
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-42012/
47/2016–IR(DU) dated 02.05.2016 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad
(Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the demands of Shri Ashok Parmar and 437 Badli workers against the management of Rajnagar
Textiles Mills Ltd., (A Unit of NTC), Ahmedabad for regularised in permanent service or with permanent pass
and for the demand of basic wage with DA as per BIR Cotton Textile Mill are justified? If so, then what relief
Shri Ashok Parmar and 437 workers are entitled to?”
1. The reference dates back to 02.05.2016. Notice Ex. 2 was sent to both the parties. Acknowledgement of notice
Ex. 3 to the first party was received but neither the acknowledgement of the notice nor the notice being served,
is received back for the second party. Thus the second party is also deemed served in the month of December,
2016 but despite a lapse of more than a year, neither of the parties has appeared nor filed their statement of
claim or written statement as the case may be.
2. Thus it appears that the second party is not willing to prosecute the case.
3. Thus the reference is disposed of in the absence of the statement of claim of the second party with the
observation as under: “the demands of Shri Ashok Parmar and 437 Badli workers against the management of
Rajnagar Textiles Mills Ltd., (A Unit of NTC), Ahmedabad for regularised in permanent service or with
permanent pass and for the demand of basic wage with DA as per BIR Cotton Textile Mill cannot be said to
be justified.”
P.K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 21 ebZ] 2018
dk-vk- 838-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj] nwjlapkj
ftyk vfHk;ark] nwjlapkj foHkkx] tkeuxj (xqtjkr) vkSj vU; ,oa muds deZpkjh ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa
ds chp vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn iapkV (lanHkZ
lhthvkbZVh, la[;k 1092/2004) çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 02-04-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&40012@52@1997&vkbZvkj (Mh-;w-)º
jktsUnz tks'kh] mi funs'kd
New Delhi, the 21st May, 2018
S.O. 838.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. CGITA No. 1092/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal
cum Labour Court, Ahmedabad, as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation
to the Telecom District Engineer, Telecom Department, Jamnagar (Gujarat) & others and their workman, which was
received by the Central Government on 02.04.2018.
[No. L-40012/52/1997-IR (DU)]
RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present: Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,
Presiding Officer, CGIT cum Labour Court,
Ahmedabad,
Dated 08th March, 2018
Reference: (CGITA) No- 1092/2004
1. The Telecom District Engineer,
Telecom Department,
Jamnagar (Gujarat) – 361001
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
4015
2. The Assistant Engineer,
Microwave Maintainance,
Khambalia – 361305
3. The Divisional Engineer,
Telecom Microwave Maintainance, K.R. Telephone Exchange,
Rajkot – 360001
4. The Divisional Engineer,
Telecom Microwave Maintainance,
K.R. Telephone Exchange,
Ahmedabad – 360001
…First Party
V/s
Ravidas Madhavdas Sarpadadia,
C/o Shri G.S. Uppal,
Plot No. 381,
Ward No. 2-B, Adipur,
Kutch (Gujarat) – 370205
…Second Party
For the First Party :
Shri N.K. Trivedi
For the Second Party :
None
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-40012/
52/97–IR(DU) dated 16.04.1998 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the Telecom District Engineer, Jamnagar/ Divisional Engineer, Telecom Microwave
Maintenance, Ahmedabad/Rajkot and Asstt. Engineer, Microwave Maintenance, Khambhalia, in not taking on
duties/discontinuance/terminating the services of Shri Ravidas Madhavdas Sarpadadia w.e.f. 02.01.1989 just,
valid and legal? If not, what benefits the workman is entitled for and what directions are necessary in the
matter?”
1. The reference dates back to 16.04.1998.The second party submitted the statement of claim Ex. 2 on
06.11.1999 alleging that he was appointed on 15.04.1987 as a casual labour and was terminated in 1989. He
worked for more than 240 days in each and every calendar year. He was not served any notice or paying notice
pay while terminating his services in the year 1989. He was terminated without any reason retaining the junior
workman in the service despite having seniority list of all the workmen.
2. The first party denied all the facts in the written statement Ex. 6 alleging that this workman challenged his
termination in the Central Administrative Tribunal vide OA No. 751 to 757 of 1988 along with number of
workmen wherein the Central Administrative Tribunal disposed of the aforesaid petitions observing that the
termination order was legal as respondents has offered compensation, therefore, respondents have paid the one
month pay.
3. The second party Ravidas Madhavdas Sarpadadia submitted his affidavit Ex. 21 admitting the facts that they
challenged the termination order in the Central Administrative Tribunal but refused to accept the
compensation amount of Rs. 922/- sent by the first party.
4. The first party submitted the affidavit of his witness Deepak Kantilal Shah reiterating the averments made in
the written statement.
5. The second party did not turn up and offered himself for cross-examination and also did not appear to cross-
examine the first party witness.
6. The judgement of the Central Administrative Tribunal in aforesaid petitions OA No. 751 to 757 of 1988 has
not been challenged in the higher court. Thus, it has attained the finality and cannot be adjudicated by this
tribunal being the res-judicata. Hence the reference has no force and liable to be dismissed.
7. This is the award of this tribunal that the reference is disposed of as per the observations above.
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
4016
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ubZ fnYyh] 21 ebZ] 2018
dk-vk- 839-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj] ftyk
vfHk;ark] ch,l,u,y] ikyuiqj (chds) ,oa muds deZpkjh ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqcaèk esa
fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn iapkV (lanHkZ lhthvkbZVh, la[;k
1198/2004) çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 02-04-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&40011@35@2001&vkbZvkj (Mh-;w-)º
jktsUnz tks'kh] mi funs'kd
New Delhi, the 21st May, 2018
S.O. 839.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. CGITA No. 1198/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal
cum Labour Court, Ahmedabad, as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation
to the District Engineer, BSNL, Palanpur (B.K.) and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on
02.04.2018.
[No. L-40011/35/2001-IR (DU)]
RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present: Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,
Presiding Officer, CGIT cum Labour Court,
Ahmedabad, Dated 08th March, 2018
Reference: (CGITA) No- 1198/2004
The District Engineer,
BSNL, O/o The General Manager Telecom District,
District Banaskantha,
Palanpur (B.K.) – 385001
…First Party
V/s
The President, Saurashtra Employees Unoin,
City Shops, 3rd Floor, Opp. Jagnath Police Chowky,
Dr. Yagnik Road, Rajkot (Gujarat) – 360001
…Second Party
For the First Party : Shri N.K. Trivedi
For the Second Party : Shri B.B. Gogia
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-40011/
35/2001–IR(DU) dated 21.05.2002 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad
(Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of Telecom Department, Palanpur to discontinue the services of
Shri Ajay Kumar Pal and not to give employment is justified or legal? If not, what relief the workman is
entitled for and since when?”
1. The reference dates back to 21.05.2002. After receiving the notice, the workman Ajay Kumar Pal, hereinafter,
referred to as “second party” submitted the statement of claim Ex. 2 alleging that he was appointed as a casual
labour by the The District Engineer, BSNL, O/o The General Manager Telecom District, District Banaskantha,
Palanpur, hereinafter, referred to as “first party” on 01.06.1989 and he continued to work till 30.09.1990.
Again he was allowed to work from 01.07.1995 till 01.06.1998 when his services were orally terminated
without following the pre-conditions of the Section 25 of the Industrial Disputes Act. He was allowed to work
from 01.08.1997 on voucher basis under SDO, Telephones, Palanpur but his name was not shown in the
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
4017
muster roll where he continued to work till 01.06.1998. All the details are submitted by him. On the above
details, it can be said that he worked continuously more than 240 days in the last preceding 12 months prior to
termination of his services w.e.f. 01.06.1989 which was illegal and void due to not following the procedure
given in Section 25 F of the Industrial Disputes Act. He has further alleged that a workman junior to him has
been retained in service and many of them have been regularised, thus it was violative of provisions of Section
25 G and H of the Industrial Disputes Act. He has further alleged that under the scheme of the Telecom
Department, he was entitled for the temporary status and also to be appointed as regular mazdoor which was
denied illegally with a malafide intention. Thus he has prayed for quashing the impugned termination order
and reinstatement with back wages.
2. The first party submitted the written statement Ex. 8 stating that the demand of the second party union is false,
concocted and against the provisions of law. The workman worked under The General Manager Telecom
District, District Banaskantha, Palanpur during the period stated in the statement of claim. Therefore, this
tribunal has no jurisdiction to adjudicate the matter. He had been working as a temporary daily wage basis
from 01.07.1989 and was given work according to the requirement of department as a unskilled labour and
was paid minimum wages according to Government Rules. The workman resumed duty on 01.07.1995 and
left the work in August, 1995 voluntarily. Thereafter, he worked for some time in the year 1997 and 1998. He
also moved to Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) where he was directed to approach the proper forum. It
is wrong to say that he was removed arbitrary and with a malafide intention.
3. All the documents referred in the statement of claim as well as in the written statement have been filed by the
respective parties.
4. On the basis of the pleading, the following issues arise:
i.
Whether the action of the management of Telecom Department, Palanpur to discontinue the services of
Shri Ajay Kumar Pal and not to give employment is justified or legal?
ii. If not, to what relief, if any, the workman is entitled for and since when?
5. As both the issues are interrelated, therefore, are decided together.
6. Issue No. i and ii: The burden of prove of these aforesaid issues was on the second party workman. The
workman Ajay Kumar Pal submitted his affidavit Ex. 14 reiterating the averments made in the statement of
claim Ex. 2. He has not said anything contrary to what he has stated in the affidavit.
7. The first party submitted the affidavit Ex. 16 of Lakhubhai Dosjibhai Deria, The Assistant General Manager in
the office of General Manager, Telecom, Palanpur, and he stated on oath that the workman was engaged as per
requirement of the department on need basis as daily wager on 01.07.1989. He worked for 178 days in the
year 1989, 337 days in the year 1990, 262 days in the year 1991, 277 days in the year 1992 and 56 days in the
year 1993 and thereafter left the work at his own accord. In the year 1994, he did not work but he worked for
52 days in the year 1995 and left the work again at his own accord. He was engaged in the year 1996.
Lakhubhai Dosjibhai Deria again stated that the workman worked for 137 days in the year 1997 and 128 days
in the year 1998 and again left the job at his own accord. Thus the concerned workman did not work for more
than 240 days during the tenure of his service during last 5 years. He was engaged without following due
procedure. The work assigned to the workman was not of permanent nature and the said work is now being
done by the labour contractor and the Central Government has imposed the ban on the engagement of
casual/daily wagers. The second party workman was paid remuneration on vouchers on the basis of his
attendance recorded in the muster roll. He was not entitled for any other benefits except wages. The second
party workman left the work at his own accord, hence, the question of issuing notice or paying retrenchment
or notice pay, did not arise. The workman was not following under the criteria of temporary status; therefore,
he was not absorbed. The other casual workers who were eligible were permitted to continue and the rest were
not re-engaged. This workman cannot be re-engaged as the said work now being done by the labour
contractor. Hence the dispute raised is liable to be dismissed. In his cross-examination, he has stated that the
workman from whom the work is taken on ACG 17 are separately registered and the salary is paid on
vouchers but he has not brought those vouchers. The workman was on muster roll up to 1993, thereafter on
ACG 17. The workman was working as a labour for digging the trench. He has further stated that a workman,
who has worked for more than 240 days, would have the temporary status. He can produced the attendance
record of the second party if available prior to 01.06.1998. The second party workman has worked for more
than 240 days in some of the years but he did not work for more than 240 days in the preceding year to the
date 01.06.1998. He was not given any notice or notice pay.
8. The second party has referred Devinder Singh V/s Municipal Counsel, Sanaur, 2011 Law Suit (SC) 475,
wherein the apex court confirmed the order of reinstatement of the workman by the Labour Court wherein the
4018
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
workman worked for more than 240 days in the calendar year preceding the termination of his service from
the date w.e.f. 30.09..1996 without complying the mandatory provisions of Section 25 F of the Industrial
Disputes Act. He has also referred Jasbir Singh V/s State of Haryana, Civil Appeal Number 346 of 2015
(Arising out of SLP (C) No. 1532 of 2014), wherein the apex court confirmed the award of Industrial
Tribunal-cum-Labour Court reinstating the workman on the ground that the services of the workman were
terminated on 31.12.1993 without complying the mandatory provisions of Section 25 F, G and H of the
Industrial Disputes Act. He has further referred Deepali Gundu Surwase V/s Kranti Junior Adhyapak
Mahavidyalaya and other, 2013 Law Suit (SC) 994. The said judgement relates to a case where the Head
Mistress of the Vidyalaya address a letter to all the teachers to contribute Rs. 1500/- per month towards the tax
liability which the appellant refused, consequently, the management issued 25 Memo to the appellant and put
him under suspension. The apex court ordered reinstatement, confirming the order of the tribunal. As the facts
of this judgement are different to this case, hence no applicability in the case. He has further referred an old
case of the apex court Surendra Kumar Verma V/s Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, New Delhi, 1980 Law Suit (SC) 412, wherein the apex court observed that the provisions Section 25
B(2) of the Industrial Dispute Act, are plain enough and are reproduced as under:
“[25 B. Definition of continuous service – For the purposes of this Chapter,-
(1) A workman shall be said to be in continuous service for a period if he is, for that period, in uninterrupted
service, including service which may be interrupted on account of sickness or authorised leave or an
accident or a strike which is not illegal, or a lock-out or a cessation of work which is not due to any fault
on the part of the workman;
(2) Where a workman is not in continuous service within the meaning of clause (1) for a period of one year or
six months, he shall be deemed to be in continuous service under an employer-
(a) For a period of one year, if the workman, during a period of twelve calendar months preceding the
date with reference to which calculation is to be made, has actually worked under the employer for
not less than-
(i)
One hundred and ninety days in the case of a workman employed below ground in a mine;
and
(ii)
Two hundred and forty days, in any other case;
(b) For a period of six month, if the workman, during a period of six calendar months preceding the date
with reference to which calculation is to be made, has actually worked under the employer for not
less than-
(i)
Ninety-five days, in the case of workman employed below ground in a mine; and
(ii)
One hundred and twenty days, in any other case.
Explanation – for the purposes of clause (2), the number of days on which a workman has actually worked under an
employer shall include the days on which-
(i) He has been laid-off under an agreement or as permitted by standing orders made under the Industrial
Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 (20 of 1946), or under the act or under any other law applicable to
the industrial establishment;
(ii) He has been on leave with full wages, earned in the previous years;
(iii) He has been absent due to temporary disablement caused by accident arising out of and in the course of his
employment; and
(iv) In the case of a female, she has been on maternity leave; so, however, that the total period of such maternity
leave does not exceed twelve weeks.]”
It is further observed by the apex court that under Section 25 F, the workman should be in continuous service
for not less than one year under an employer and under Section 25 B(2), even if a workman has not been in
continuous service under an employer for a period of one year, he shall deemed to have been in such
continuous service for a period of one year if he has actually worked under the employer for 240 days in the
preceding period of 12 month. There is no stipulation that he should have been in employment or service
under the employer for a whole period of 12 months. The apex court allowed all the appeals and reinstated the
appellants without full back wages in all those appeals where the workmen have worked for 240 days in the
period of 12 months. It is not necessary that he should have been in the service of employer for one whole
year.
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
4019
9. In the present case, it is an admitted fact that the second party workman worked for 178 days in the year 1989,
337 days in the year 1990, 262 days in the year 1991, 277 days in the year 1992 and 56 days in the year 1993
and thereafter left the work at his own accord. In the year 1994, he did not work. But he worked for 52 days in
the year 1995 and left the work again at his own accord. He was engaged in the year 1996. He again stated that
the workman worked for 137 days in the year 1997 and 128 days in the year 1998. The only issue is that he
worked for more than 240 days in some of the years.
10. Though the learned counsel of the first party has referred Himanshu Kumar Vidharthi V/s State of Bihar, 1997
(76) FLR SC Page 237, wherein the apex court has observed as under:
“Admittedly, they were not appointed to the posts in accordance with the rules but were engaged on the basis
of need of the work. They are temporary employees working on daily wages. Under these circumstances, their
disengagement from service cannot be construed to be a retrenchment under the Industrial Disputes Act. The
concept of “retrenchment”, therefore, cannot be stretched to such an extent as to cover these employees. Since
they are only daily-wage employees and have no right to the posts, their disengagement is not arbitrary.”
The first party has further referred Kendriya Vidyalaya Sanghathan and Anr. V/s S.C. Sharma, (2005) LLR SC
275, wherein the apex court has observed as under:
“For dispensation of holding of an enquiry before termination of an employee, it is imperative for the
employer to record a conclusion that it was not reasonably practicable to hold the enquiry proceedings even
when the employee was absconding and not responding to the notices as such his termination sans enquiry
will be set aside.
For entitlement of back wages on reinstatement of an employer, the initial burden lies upon the employee that
he was not gainfully employed and thereafter the employer can rebut the same.
When the employee as directed to be reinstated in service with back wages by the Tribunals and High Court,
he will not be entitled to back wages since he has neither pleaded nor placed any material that he was not
gainfully employed.”
11. The main argument of the advocate for the first party is that the workman left the job at his own accord;
therefore, he cannot take advantage of his own fault. But the first party has not submitted the attendance
register/muster roll of the questioned period which may established the willingly leaving the job by the
workman. The reference is of 21.05.2002 and the workman served the first party from 1989 to 1998. The
workman has not disclosed in his evidence as to who the junior workers were engaged or re-engaged but it has
also not been specifically denied by the first party. The workman must have attained the age of 30 years in the
year 2003, now he would have attained the age of 45 years, so it cannot be said that he has lost his utility in
the service.
12. It is established in the absence of the evidence by the first party that the workman was retrenched without
giving notice and notice pay. Thus the reference deserves to be allowed. As the first party witness has
admitted that the workmen, who served for 240 days, are granted temporary status, same shall be given in this
case. Therefore, the second party workman Ajay Kumar Pal shall be reinstated in service without paying back
wages on the principle of “no work no pay”. Both the issues are decided in the light of the aforesaid
observations and the first party is directed to reinstate the second party workman within 60 days from the
publication of this award.
13. The award is passed accordingly.
P.K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 21 ebZ] 2018
dk-vk- 840-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj] egkizca/d
(iQksu)] nwjlapkj foHkkx] jktdksV (xqtjkr) vkSj muds deZpkjh vkSj vU; ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp
vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn iapkV (lanHkZ (lhthvkbZVh,)
la--1018/2004) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 02-04-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&40012@80@1994&vkbZvkj (Mh-;w-)º
jktsUnz tks'kh] mi funs'kd
4020
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
New Delhi, the 21st May, 2018
S.O. 840.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. (CGITA) No.-1018/2004) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in
relation to the General Manager (Phones), Telecom Department, Rajkot (Gujarat) and their workman & Other, which
was received by the Central Government on 02.04.2018.
[No. L-40012/80/1994-IR (DU)]
RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present: Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,
Presiding Officer, CGIT cum Labour Court,
Ahmedabad, Dated 15th March, 2018
Reference: (CGITA) No.- 1018/2004
The General Manager (Phones),
Department of Telecom,
Behind Girnar Talkies,
Rajkot (Gujarat)
…First Party
V/s
1. Shri Popatlal Dudabhai Tank,
Baroda Pristege, Jagdishnagar,
Mohanbhai Zarkiy Building, Gala No. 2,
Surat (Gujarat)
2. The President,
Saurashtra Employees Union,
City Shops, Dr. Yagnik Road,
Opp. Jagnath Police Chowki,
Rajkot (Gujarat)
…Second Party
For the First Party : Shri H.R. Raval
For the Second Party : Adv. K.L. Kalwani
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order
No. L-40012/80/94–IR(DU) dated 28.08.1996 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal,
Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of General Manager (Phones), Department of Telecom, Behind
Girnar Cinema, Rajkot – 360001, in terminating the services of Shri Popatlal D. Tank, Casual Labourer is
legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled to?”
1. The reference dates back to 28.08.1996. Both the parties submitted their statement of claim and written
statement on 13.04.1998 and 29.07.1998 respectively along with number of documents. The case was listed
for hearing but since then second party has been absent and has refrained to appear before the tribunal for
hearing. Today on 15.03.2018, the advocate for the second party workman Mrs. K.L. Kalwani stated that the
workman has not been in her contact since long.
2. Thus it appears that the second party workman is not willing to prosecute the case.
3. Thus the reference is finally disposed of in the absence of the evidence of the second party workman with the
observation as under: “the action of the management of General Manager (Phones), Department of Telecom,
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
4021
Behind Girnar Cinema, Rajkot – 360001, in terminating the services of Shri Popatlal D. Tank, Casual
Labourer can be said to be legal and justified.”
P.K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 21 ebZ] 2018
dk-vk- 841-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj] egkizca/d
nwjlapkj foHkkx] jktdksV (xqtjkr) ,oa muds deZpkjh ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V
vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn iapkV (lanHkZ (lhthvkbZVh,) la[;k-
1098/2004) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 02-04-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&40012@21@1997&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)º
jktsUnz tks'kh] mi funs'kd
New Delhi, the 21st May, 2018
S.O. 841.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. (CGITA) No.-1098/2004) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in
relation to the General Manager, Telecom Department, Rajkot (Gujarat) and their workman, which was received by the
Central Government on 02.04.2018.
[No. L-40012/21/1997-IR (DU)]
RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present: Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,
Presiding Officer, CGIT cum Labour Court,
Ahmedabad, Dated 08th March, 2018
Reference: (CGITA) No.- 1098/2004
The General Manager,
Telecom Department,
3rd Floor, Umesh Commercial Complex,
Near Chaudhary High School,
Rajkot (Gujarat) – 360001
…First Party
V/s
Shri Kiritkumar Bhanushankar Pandya,
Gaikwadi, 1/10, Rajkot (Gujarat) – 360001
…Second Party
For the First Party : Shri H.R. Raval
For the Second Party : Adv. K.L. Kalwani
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order
No. L-40012/21/97–IR(DU) dated 13.05.1998 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal,
Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of The General Manager, Telecom Deptt., Rajkot in terminating the
services of Shri K.B. Pandya is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled?”
1. The reference dates back to 13.05.1998. Both the parties submitted their statement of claim and written
statement along with number of documents. The case was listed for evidence of second party but the second
party failed to appear for his cross examination on his affidavit Ex. 12 by which his examination chief was
recorded on 24.04.2002. The second party also has been absent since last several dates for cross examination.
4022
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Today on 08.03.2018, the advocate for the second party workman Mrs. K.L. Kalwani stated that the workman
has not been in her contact since long.
2. Thus it appears that the second party workman is not willing to prosecute the case.
3. Thus the reference is finally disposed of in the absence of the evidence of the second party workman with the
observation as under: “the action of the management of The General Manager, Telecom Deptt., Rajkot in
terminating the services of Shri K.B. Pandya can be said to be legal and justified.”
P.K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 21 ebZ] 2018
dk-vk- 842-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj] fMohtuy
bathfu;j] VsyhdkWe ekbØksoso izkstsDV] jktdksV (xqtjkr) vkSj vU; ,oa muds deZpkjh ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds
deZdkjksa ds chp vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn iapkV
(lanHkZ (lhthvkbZVh,) la[;k-1147/2004) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 02-04-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&40012@42@1998&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)º
jktsUnz tks'kh] mi funs'kd
New Delhi, the 21st May, 2018
S.O. 842.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. (CGITA) No.-1147/2004) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in
relation to the Divisional Engineer, Telecom Microwave Project, Rajkot (Gujarat) & Other and their workman, which
was received by the Central Government on 02.04.2018.
[No. L-40012/42/1998-IR (DU)]
RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present: Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,
Presiding Officer, CGIT cum Labour Court,
Ahmedabad, Dated 08th March, 2018
Reference: (CGITA) No.- 1147/2004
1. The Divisional Engineer,
Telecom, Microwave Project,
Rajkot (Gujarat) – 360001
2. The Sub-Divisional Officer,
Telegraphs, Microwave Maintenance,
Jamnagar (Gujarat) – 361001
…First Party
V/s
The President,
Saurashtra Employees Union,
Umesh Commercial Complex, 2nd Floor, Office No. 213 and 214,
Near Chaudhary High School,
Rajkot (Gujarat) – 360001
…Second Party
For the First Party : Shri N.K. Trivedi
For the Second Party : Adv. K.L. Kalwani
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940
4023
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order
No. L-40012/42/98–IR(DU) dated 30.11.1998 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal,
Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the Divisional Engineer, Telecom Microwave Project, Rajkot in terminating the
services of Shri Kishoregiri Vajugiri Aparnathi, Casual Labour is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the
workman is entitled?”
1. The reference dates back to 30.11.1998. Both the parties submitted their statement of claim and written
statement along with number of documents. The case was listed for evidence of second party but he has been
absent since last several dates for submitting his evidence.
2. Today on 08.03.2018, the advocate for the second party workman Mrs. K.L. Kalwani stated that the workman
has not been in her contact since long. Thus it appears that the second party workman is not willing to
prosecute the case.
3. Thus the reference is finally disposed of in the absence of the evidence of the second party workman with the
observation as under: “the action of the Divisional Engineer, Telecom Microwave Project, Rajkot in
terminating the services of Shri Kishoregiri Vajugiri Aparnathi, Casual Labour can be said to be legal and
justified.”
P.K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 21 ebZ] 2018
dk-vk- 843-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj] egkizca/d
ch,l,u,y] jktdksV (xqtjkr) vkSj vU; ,oa muds deZpkjh ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqcaèk esa
fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn iapkV (lanHkZ (lhthvkbZVh,) la[;k-
107/2007) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 02-04-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&40012@42@2007&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)º
jktsUnz tks'kh] mi funs'kd
New Delhi, the 21st May, 2018
S.O. 843.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. (CGITA) No.-107/2007) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-
cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation
to the General Manager, BSNL, Rajkot (Gujarat) and their workman, which was received by the Central Government
on 02.04.2018.
[No. L-40012/42/2007-IR (DU)]
RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present: Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,
Presiding Officer, CGIT cum Labour Court,
Ahmedabad, Dated 15th March, 2018
Reference: (CGITA) No.- 107/2007
1. The General Manager,
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited,
Telecom Distt., Near Girnar Talkies,
Rajkot (Gujarat)
2. The Sub-Divisional Engineer,
Department of Telecom,
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, Jasdan
…First Party
4024
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
V/s
The Joint Secretary,
Saurashtra Employees Union,
City Shops, Dr. Yagnik Road,
Opp. Jagnath Polic Chowki,
Rajkot (Gujarat)
…Second Party
For the First Party : Shri H.R. Raval
For the Second Party : Adv. K.L. Kalwani
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order
No. L-40012/42/2007–IR(DU) dated 09.10.2007 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal,
Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited in terminating the services of their
workman Shri Vinod B. Kiri, w.e.f. 12.12.2005 is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is
entitled?”
1. The reference dates back to 09.10.2007. Both the parties submitted their statement of claim Ex. 9 and written
statement Ex. 13 on 30.09.2008 and 24.04.2009 respectively along with number of documents. The case was
listed for evidence of second party but since then second party has been absent and has refrained to lead
evidence. Today on 15.03.2018, the advocate for the second party workman Mrs. K.L. Kalwani stated that the
workman has not been in her contact since long.
2. Thus it appears that the second party workman is not willing to prosecute the case.
3. Thus the reference is finally disposed of in the absence of the evidence of the second party workman with the
observation as under: “the action of the management of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited in terminating the
services of their workman Shri Vinod B. Kiri, w.e.f. 12.12.2005 can be said to be legal and justified.”
P.K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
Uploaded by Dte. of Printing at Government of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi-110064
and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi-110054. ALOK
KUMAR
Digitally signed
by ALOK KUMAR
Date: 2018.06.16
11:37:04 +05'30'