2634 GI/2018

(3751)

jftLVªh la- Mh- ,y- (,u) 04@0007@2003µ05

REGD. No. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05

izkf/dkj ls izdkf'kr

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

lkIrkfgd

WEEKLY

la- 20]

ubZ fnYyh] ebZ 20—ebZ 26] 2018] 'kfuokj@oS'kk[k 30—T;s"B 5] 1940

No. 20]

NEW DELHI, MAY 20—MAY 26, 2018, SATURDAY/VAISAKHA 30—JYAISTHA 5, 1940

bl Hkkx esa fHkUu i`"B la[;k nh tkrh gS ftlls fd ;g i`Fkd ladyu ds :i esa j[kk tk lds

Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

Hkkx II—[k.M 3—mi&[k.M (ii)

PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)

Hkkjr ljdkj ds ea=kky;ksa (j{kk ea=kky; dks NksM+dj) }kjk tkjh fd, x, lkafof/d vkns'k vkSj vf/lwpuk,a

Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India

(Other than the Ministry of Defence)

fons'k ea=kky;

(lh-ih-oh- izHkkx)

ubZ fnYyh] 10 ebZ] 2018

dk-vk- 794-—jktuf;d vkSj dksalqyh; vf/dkjh ('kiFk ,oa iQhl) ds vf/fu;e] 1948 (1948 dk 41) dh /kjk 2 ds

[akM (d) ds vuqlj.k esa oS/kfud vkns'k A ,rn~}kjk] dsaæ ljdkj Hkkjr ds iz/ku dksalykokl] tsíkg esa Jh jkt dqekj] lgk;d vuqHkkx

vf/dkjh dks fnukad 10 ebZ] 2018 ls lgk;d dksalqyj vf/dkjh ds rkSj ij dksalqyj lsokvksa ds fuoZgu ds fy, izkfèkÑr djrh

gS A

¹la- Vh&4330@01@2015º

izdk'k pUn] funs'kd (dksalqyj)

MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS

(C.P.V. DIVISION)

New Delhi, the 10th May, 2018

S.O. 794.—Statutory Order in pursuance of clause (a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular Officers

(Oaths and Fees) Act, 1948 (41 of 1948), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Raj Kumar, Assistant Section

3752

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Officer as Assistant Consular Officer in Consulate General of India, Jeddah to perform the Consular services with

effect from 10th May, 2018.

[No. T-4330/01/2015]

PRAKASH CHAND, Director (Consular)

varfj{k foHkkx

csaxywj] 4 ebZ] 2018

dk-vk- 795-—dsaæh; ljdkj] jktHkk"kk (la?k ds 'kkldh; iz;kstuksa ds fy, iz;ksx) fu;e] 1976 ds fu;e 10 ds mifu;e (4) ds

vuqlj.k esa ,rn~}kjk varfj{k foHkkx ds fuEufyf[kr dk;kZy;] ftlds 80 izfr'kr ls vf/d deZpkfj;ksa us ¯gnh dk dk;Zlk/d Kku izkIr

dj fy;k gS] dks vfèklwfpr djrh gS %&

{ks=kh; lqnwj laosnu dsaæ & nf{k.k (vkj-vkj-,l-lh-&n-)]

vkbZlkbZV ifjlj]

csaxyw#&560037

¹la- 8@1@10@2011&¯gº

Vh- Ñ".kdqekj] voj lfpo

DEPARTMENT OF SPACE

Bangalore, the 4th May, 2018

S.O. 795.—In pursuance of Sub-rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (Use for Official Purpose of the

Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government hereby notifies the following Office of the Department of Space, whereof

more than 80 per cent staff have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi :

Regional Remote Sensing Centre – South (RRSC-S),

ISITE Campus,

Bangalore-560037

[No. 8/1/10/2011- H]

T. KRISHNAKUMAR, Under Secy.

lkaf[;dh vkSj dk;ZØe dk;kZUo;u ea=kky;

ubZ fnYyh] 18 ebZ] 2018

dk-vk- 796-—dsaæ ljdkj] jktHkk"kk (la?k ds 'kkldh; iz;kstuksa ds fy, iz;ksx) fu;e] 1976 (;Fkkla'kksf/r 1987) ds fu;e 10

ds mifu;e (4) ds vuqlj.k esa] dsaæ ljdkj ,rn~}kjk lkaf[;dh vkSj dk;ZØe dk;kZUo;u ea=kky; ds v/hu {ks=k ladk;Z izHkkx] jk"Vªh;

izfrn'kZ losZ{k.k dk;kZy; ds {ks=kh; dk;kZy;] fr:ouariqje ds fuEufyf[kr mi {ks=kh; dk;kZy;ksa dks Hkkjr ds jkti=k esa vfèklwfpr

djrh gS] ftuds 80 izfr'kr ls vf/d deZpkfj;ksa us ¯gnh dk dk;Zlk/d Kku izkIr dj fy;k gS %&

1- mi {ks=kh; dk;kZy;] dksPph

2- mi {ks=kh; dk;kZy;] dksYye

¹la- bZ&11013@6@2016&¯gnhº

vatu dqekj feJk] funs'kd

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3753

MINISTRY OF STATISTICS AND PROGARMME IMPLEMENTATION

New Delhi, the 18th May, 2018

S.O. 796.—In pursuance of Sub-rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (Use for Official Purpose of the

Union) Rules, 1976 (as amended 1987), the Central Government hereby notifies the following offices of Regional

Office, Thiruvananthapuram of Field Operation Division, NSSO of Ministry of Statistics and Progarmme

Implementation in the Gazette of India, where more than 80 per cent of staff have acquired the working knowledge of

Hindi :

1.

Sub-Regional Office, Kochi

2.

Sub-Regional Office, Kollam

[No. E-11013/6/2016-Hindi]

ANJAN KUMAR MISHRA, Director

कृिष

कृिष

कृिष

कृिष एवं कसान क याण

एवं कसान क याण

एवं कसान क याण

एवं कसान क याण मंालय

मंालय

मंालय

मंालय

(कृिष

कृिष

कृिष

कृिष, सहकारता

सहकारता

सहकारता

सहकारता एवं कसान कयाण

एवं कसान कयाण

एवं कसान कयाण

एवं कसान कयाण िवभाग

िवभाग

िवभाग

िवभाग )

नई दली, 18 मई, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 797

797

797

797.—के सरकार एतद् ारा बरा य सहकारी सिमितयां अिधिनयम, 2002 (2002 का 39) क धारा 4 क

उपधारा (1) ारा द त शि तय का उपयोग करते ए दनांक 20 मई, 2018 से 10 जून, 2018 तक डॉ. आशीष कुमार भुटानी,

संयु त सिचव (सहका*रता) क अवकाश अविध के दौरान के ीय पंजीयक सहकारी सिमितयां के काय-भार क देखरेख के िलए 0ी दनेश

कुमार, संयु त सिचव (एमआईडीएच) को कृिष एवं कसान क याण मं7ालय, कृिष, सहका*रता एवं कसान क याण िवभाग म8 िनयु त

करती है।

[सं. एल-11012/2/2003-एल एंड एम]

सुशील कुमार झा, अवर सिचव

MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FARMERS WELFARE

(Department of Agriculture, Co-operation and Farmers Welfare)

New Delhi, the 18th May, 2018

S.O. 797.—In exercise of the powers conferred vide sub-section (1) of Section 4 of the Multi-State

Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 (39 of 2002), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Dinesh Kumar, Joint

Secretary (MIDH) in the Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Department of Agriculture, Co-operation and

Farmers Welfare to look after the work of Central Registrar of Co-operative Societies during the leave period of Dr.

Ashish Kumar Bhutani, Joint Secretary (Co-operation) w.e.f. 20th May, 2018 to 10th June, 2018.

[No. L-11012/2/2003-L&M]

SUSHIL KUMAR JHA, Under Secy.

पोत परवहन मंालय

पोत परवहन मंालय

पोत परवहन मंालय

पोत परवहन मंालय

नई द ली, 21 मई, 2018

िवषय :

िवषय :

िवषय :

िवषय :

(क) एिसम यानांतरण कंटेनर एवं (ख) खाली कंटेनर के तटीय संचलन के िलए

(क) एिसम यानांतरण कंटेनर एवं (ख) खाली कंटेनर के तटीय संचलन के िलए

(क) एिसम यानांतरण कंटेनर एवं (ख) खाली कंटेनर के तटीय संचलन के िलए

(क) एिसम यानांतरण कंटेनर एवं (ख) खाली कंटेनर के तटीय संचलन के िलए वािणि यक नौवहन अिधिनयम

वािणि यक नौवहन अिधिनयम

वािणि यक नौवहन अिधिनयम

वािणि यक नौवहन अिधिनयम, 1958

1958

1958

1958

क$ धारा 406 के अंतग)त रयाय

क$ धारा 406 के अंतग)त रयाय

क$ धारा 406 के अंतग)त रयाय

क$ धारा 406 के अंतग)त रयायत।

त।

त।

त।

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 798

798

798

798.—

1.

जबक वािणियक पोत प*रवहन अिधिनयम को 1958 म8 उस समय अिधिनयिमत कया गया था जब कंटेनर काग@ शुAआती

चरण म8 था (कंटेनर के िलए आईएसओ मानक 1956 म8 िनधा-*रत कए गए थे)। भारत म8 कंटेनर पोत प*रवहन वष- 1980 म8

3754

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ही शुF आ और इस कार भारत म8 यह अिधिनयम कंटेनर I यवसाय से पहले लागू आ। इस अिधिनयम के लागू होने के समय

काग@ का यानांतरण उतना मह वपूण- मुKा नहL था, दरअसल अिधिनयम म8 ऐसी संभावना क प*रक पना भी नहL क गई थी।

2.

जबक कंटेनर के माN यम से काग@ संचलन सतत Fप से बढ़ रहा है और वत-मान म8 यह भारत के कुल एिसम I यापार क मा7ा

के Fप म8 20% से अिधक है तथा गितशील अंतरा-R Sीय I यापार के ऐसे प*रदृT य म8 जहां अंतरा-R Sीय पोत प*रवहन शु क बत

ितU पVा- मक हW, बेहतर आXथक िUथित (इकॉनोमीज़ ऑफ U केल) हािसल करने के िलए कंटेनर I यापार का ] वाइंट-टू-] वाइंट से

हब-ए^ ड-U पोक मॉडल तक ती_ता से िवकास आ है। इस कार कंटेनर को छोटे प तन से फडर जलयान के माN यम से

यानांतरण प तन पर एकि7त कया जाता है, जहां उ ह8 यानांतरण या मैनलाइन प तन भेजने के िलए बड़े कंटेनर लाइनर पर

लादा जाता है। ऐसा मॉडल भारत म8 पूरी तरह िवकिसत नहL आ है और इसके प*रणामU वFप लगभग 33% भारतीय कंटेनर

काग@ िवदेशी प तन पर ही यानांत*रत होता है। वष- दर-वष- यानांतरण क मा7ा बढ़ती जा रही है और वष- 2007-08 के

26% से बढ़ कर वष- 2016-17 म8 यह 33% हो गया है (भारतीय प तन एसोिसएशन)।

3.

जबक कंटेनर पोत प*रवहन के िलए I यापार मॉडल, हब ए^ ड U पोक मॉडल पर दृढ़ता से िU थर आ है और इसके कारण

िवT वभर म8 यानांतरण हब का िनमा-ण आ है।

4.

जबक पोत प*रवहन और कंटेनर संभलाई तकनीक म8 तर क होने से आधार-जलयान के Fप म8 लगाए जाने वाले जलयान के

आकार (18,000 टीईयू से अिधक) म8 दन ब दन वृिV हो रही है और अिधक गहराई के डुबाव वाले यानांतरण प तन िवकिसत

कए जा रहे हW।

5.

जबक समूचे िवT व म8, वत-मान म8, U थािपत यानांतरण प तन भिवR य म8 यानांतरण प तन के Fप म8 अपनी उ कृR टता को बनाए

रखने के िलए आधुिनक प तन के Fप म8 अपने िवकास के िलए अिधक से अिधक िनवेश कर रहे हW।

6.

जबक भारत म8 dे7ीय हब प तन के साथ ितU पVा- करने के िलए नीितगत ढ़ांच और लागत लाभ के साथ बड़े, आधुिनक,

अंतरा-R Sीय, यानांतरण प तन/हब का सुदृढ़ इको-िसU टम िवकिसत कया जाना अभी भी बाक है।

7.

जबक िवदेशी यानांतरण प तन म8 भारतीय काग@ का यानांतरण होने पर िवदेशी प तन पर यातायात म8 वृिV होती है, और

इससे अ य देश म8 रोज़गार सृिजत होते हW, प तन और लॉिजिUटक भार के Fप म8 भारतीय िशपर/परेिषितय या

िनया-तक/आयातक से होने वाले राजU व म8 हािन होती है एवं िवदेशी प तन ारा भारतीय िनया-तक/आयातक से यानांतरण

राजU व एवं भार क वसूली कए जाने के कारण िवदेशी मु ा क भी हािन होती है।

8.

जबक भारत म8 यानांतरण प तन को बढ़ावा देने से (क) पोत प*रवहन लाइन के बीच ितU पVा- बढ़ेगी और समान अवसर के

कारण fैट दर म8 कमी आएगी िजससे भारतीय I यापार और अिधक ितU पVा- मक बनेगा। (ख) भारतीय प तन बनाम िवदेशी

प तन म8 समय एवं दूरी कुशल लॉिजिUट स से भी फडgरग लागत म8 कमी आएगी। (ग) भारतीय कंटेनर काग@ को िवदेशी

प तन से भारतीय प तन म8 अंत*रत करने से प तन के लाभ एवं रोज़गार म8 और अिधक वृिV होगी। (घ) यानांतरण इको-

िसU टम (प तन एवं लॉिजिUट स से टर, लघु एवं मN यम उiम, प तन और पोत प*रवहन dे7 के सेवा दाताj को सdम

बनाने सिहत) क U थापना होने से भारतीय प तन िवदेशी प तन से आने वाले और वहां तक जाने वाले काग@ को संभवत:

अपनी तरफ आकXषत कर सकते हW, िजससे भारतीय महाप तन क काग@ मा7ा म8 और अिधक वृिV होगी तथा (ड.) िवदेशी

मु ा को भारत म8 रखने म8 सफलता िमलेगी।

9.

जबक िवदेशी प तन म8 स] लाई लाइन लैग टाइम तथा यानांतरण से एिसम I यापार क लागत म8 भारी वृिV होती है िजससे

वैिT वक बाज़ार म8 भारतीय I यापा*रय और िविनमा-ताj क ितU पVा- मकता पर ितकूल भाव पड़ता है।

10.

जबक भारतीय प तन और भारतीय यानांतरण प तन के बीच समु के माN यम से एिसम कंटेनर के यातायात को ो सािहत

करने के िलए फडर dमता को बढ़ाने क अवT यकता है।

11.

जबक भारत म8 यानांतरण प तन को िवकिसत करने के िलए भारत म8 कंटेनर के यानांतरण तथा फडर के िलए कंटेनर

जलयान क पंच क सुगमता, समयबV सेवाj क िवT वसनीयता और उपलl धता एक पूवा-पेdा है।

12.

जबक दुतरफा काग@ संचलन क I यवU था करने से प*रवहन क लागत म8 कमी आने, काग@ क मा7ा म8 वृिV होने और नौवहन

बेड़ म8 िनवेश सुकर बनने क संभावना है।

13.

जबक समु ी प*रवहन म8 रेल तथा सड़क माग- से प*रवहन क तुलना म8 माल के प*रवहन के ित टन-क.मी. लागत म8 कमी

लाने के साथ ही लंबी दूरी तक माल के प*रवहन से होने वाले nीनहाउस गैस उ सज-न को ित टन-क.मी. एक ितहाई तक कम

करने क dमता है।

14.

जबक वािणि यक पोत प*रवहन अिधिनयम, 1958 क धारा 406 के अनुसार भारतीय नाग*रक या भारत म8 िनगमीकृत कसी

कंपनी या भारत म8 पंजीकृत कसी सहकारी-सोसाइटी ारा चाट-र कए गए कसी भारतीय पोत या कसी अ य पोत को इस

धारा के तहत नौवहन महािनदेशक ारा द त लाइस8स के िबना भारत म8 या भारत के बाहर के कसी प तन या U थान से समु

म8 ले जाने क अनुमित नहL दान क गई है।

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3755

15.

जबक कंटेनर के यानांतरण के I यवसाय मॉडल से डील करने के िलए, कई देश ने अंतरा-R Sीय I यापार क मा7ा बढ़ाने और

प*रवहन लागत को कम करने के िलए अपने घरेलू कानून (कानून) म8 *रयायत देकर िवदेशी N वज वाले जलयान को अपने

तटीय इलाक म8 काग@ के यानांतरण क अनुमित देने के िलए कदम उठाए हW।

16.

जबक भारत के एिसम I यापार म8 कंटेनरीकृत काग@ के qमश: बढ़ती िहU सेदारी और कसी िवशेष प तन से होने वाले आयात

और िनया-त म8 असंतुलन के कारण कुछ प तन पर खाली कंटेनर और कुछ अ य प तन पर, उिचत आकार और कार के Fप म8,

कंटेनर क कमी क समU या िनरंतर बनी रहती है। इस कार खाली कंटेनर क *रइr पोिजशsनग के िलए लागत म8 पया-] त

बढ़ोतरी के िबना भारतीय तट पर एक प तन से दूसरे प तन तक सही आकार और कार के खाली कंटेनर के संचलन क

आवT यकता है।

17.

जबक िनरंतर बनी ई समान कार क मांग के कारण बेड़ म8 पया-] त Fप से िनवेश नहL हो पाता और इसके प*रणामU वFप

भारतीय तट पर खाली कंटेनर क *रइr पोिजशsनग के िलए लागत म8 बढ़ोतरी के िबना एक प तन से दूसरे प तन तक खाली

कंटेनर क संचालन क आवT यकता पड़ती है।

18.

जबक 11 मई, 2018 क अिधसूचना सं. 38/2018 –कU टr स (एन.टी.) के अनुसार क8 ीय अ यd कर एवं सीमाशु क बोड- ने

आयाितत माल, िनया-त माल, तटीय माल एवं िवदेश म8 Sैांिजट या यानांतरण के िलए ेिषत माल के वहन के िलए ािधकृत

समु ी वाहक को इस शत- पर अनुमित दान क है क उनके ारा उिचत अिधकारी को समेकत U थान एवं आगमन मैिनफेU ट

इलै Sॉिनक Fप से भेजा गया हो।

19.

जबक मौजूदा िविनयामक संरचना के अनुसार नौवहन महािनदेशक ारा वाि^यियक पोत प*रवहन अिधिनयम, 1958 क

धारा 406 के तहत जारी कए गए लाइस8स के अधीन ही भारतीय नग*रक या भारत म8 िनगमीकृत कसी कंपनी या भारत म8

पंजीकृत कसी सहकारी-सोसाइटी ारा चाट-र कया गया कोई िवदेशी पोत भारत के कसी एक U थान या प तन से खाली

कंटेनर को लाद सकता है या भरे ए कंटेनर को भारत के अ य U थान पर पंचा सकता है।

20.

जबक भारतीय प तन को मुख यानांतरण हब के Fप म8 उपयोग करने हेतु अंितम लt य U थान तक यानांतरण कंटेनर के

प*रवहन के िलए सुिवधा दान करने क आवT यकता है।

21.

जबक, िनuदR ट पंजीकरण प तन पर पोत के पंजीकरण के आधार पर भारतीय पोत धारा 406 के तहत लाइस8स के िलए

अनुमोदत माने गए हW और इनको यानांतरण क अनुमित दान क गई है।

22.

जबक भारतीय नाग*रक या भारत म8 िनगमीकृत कसी कंपनी या भारत म8 पंजीकृत कसी सहकारी-सोसाइटी ारा चाट-र कए

गए कसी अ य पोत को भारत के अंदर या बाहर कसी प तन या U थान से समु तक ले जाने के िलए धारा 406 के तहत

लाइस8स दान कए जाने क आवT यकता है।

23.

जबक, भारत म8 I यापार को ो सािहत करना और I यापार करने को सुकर बनाना भारत सरकार ारा बल दए जाने वाले

मुख dे7 म8 से एक है, और काग@ क िशsपग और जलयान के चालन क qया को सरल बनाने क आवT यकता है।

24.

जबक उपयु- त तv य को N यान म8 रखते ए िवदेशी प तन के माN यम से भारतीय एिसम कंटेनर के यानांतरण को

कम/समा] त करने के िलए तथा खाली कंटेनर क *रपोिजशsनग क लागत म8 कमी लाने के िलए जनिहत और राR Sिहत म8

भावी नीितगत उपाय को लागू करने क आवT यकता है।

25.

अत:, वत-मान म8 क8 सरकार वािणियक पोत प*रवहन अिधिनयम, 1958 क धारा 406 उप-धारा (1) के तहत द त शिwय

का योग करते ए िनr नानुसार िनदेश देती है:

25.1 भारत म8 तटीय I यापार म8 लगे ए िनr निलिखत 0ेणी के पोत पर धारा 406 क उप-धारा(1) के ावधान लागू नहL

हगे :

क.

भारतीय नाग*रक या भारत म8 िनगमीकृत कसी कंपनी अथवा भारत म8 पंजीकृत कसी सहकारी-सोसाइटी

ारा चाट-र कए गए पोत जो यानांतरण के िलए लदे ए एिसम कंटेनर के प*रहवन हेतु वृ त अिधिनयम

क धारा 21 के खंड (ख) म8 िनयत अपेdाj को पूरा करते ह।

ख.

भारतीय नाग*रक या भारत म8 िनगमीकृत कसी कंपनी या भारत म8 पंजीकृत कसी सहकारी-सोसाइटी ारा

चाट-र कए गए पोत जो भारत के कसी प तन से भारत के कसी अ य प तन तक खाली कंटेनर के प*रवहन के

िलए वृ त अिधिनयम क धारा 21 के ख^ ड (ख) म8 िनयत अपेdाj को पूरा करते ह।

25.2 पैरा 25.1 (क) पर पोत को दी गई ये *रयायत8 िनr निलिखत के िलए उपलl ध हगी:

क.

लदे ए कंटेनर को भारत के प तन म8 यानांतरण के उKेT य से भारत के बाहर िUथत कसी प तन से या वहां

तक के िलए एकल लदान िबल पर पारेिषत कया गया हो; और

ख.

लदे ए कंटेनर पर भारत के कसी प तन पर केवल यानांतरण के िलए माल लादा या उतारा गया हो; और

ग.

लदा आ कंटेनर यानांतरण के िलए आगमन मैिनफेU ट या U थान मैिनफेU ट, जैसा भी मामला हो, के तहत

कवर कया गया हो।

3756

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

25.3 चाट-रर को चाट- कए गए जलयान के संबंध म8 नौवहन महािनदेशालय को सूचना दान करनी होगी। सूचना दान के

िलए िनधा-*रत फामxट अनुबंध

अनुबंध

अनुबंध

अनुबंध-1 म8 दया गया है और यह सूचना जलयान को चाट- करने से 24 घंटे के भीतर sd2-

[email protected]ई-मेल से नौवहन महािनदेशालय को दान करनी होगी। िनधा-*रत फामxट पर िशsपग लाइन अथवा

चालक के ािधकृत हU ताdर कता- ारा िडिजटल या अ य कार से हU ताd*रत होना चािहए।

25.4 भारतीय नौसेना, तट रdक, रा य समु ी पुिलस और सीमाशु क के साथ-साथ भारतीय कानून वत-न एज8िसय को

उ त पोत/qू के वाU तिवक प*रचय प7 क पुिy करने के िलए कसी भी समय समु म8 इन पोत पर बोड- करने क

अनुमित दी जाए।

26. यह अिधसूचना त काल भाव से लागू होगी और यह संशोिधत या वापस िलए जाने तक वैध रहेगी।

[फा. सं. एसडl  यू-15011/2/2016-एमजी]

पवनेश कुमार शमा-, अवर सिचव

अनुबंध

अनुबंध

अनुबंध

अनुबंध-1

1

1

1

नौवहन महािनदेशालय को चाट)ड जलयान क$ सूचना /दान करने के िलए फाम1ट

नौवहन महािनदेशालय को चाट)ड जलयान क$ सूचना /दान करने के िलए फाम1ट

नौवहन महािनदेशालय को चाट)ड जलयान क$ सूचना /दान करने के िलए फाम1ट

नौवहन महािनदेशालय को चाट)ड जलयान क$ सूचना /दान करने के िलए फाम1ट

(i)

चाट-रर का नाम

(ii)

आईएमओ सं. सिहत पोत का नाम

(iii)

पोत का N वज

(iv)

(iv)

(iv)

(iv)

चाट)र करने क$ अविध

चाट)र करने क$ अविध

चाट)र करने क$ अविध

चाट)र करने क$ अविध

ट

ट

ट

ट2 प

2 प

2 प

2 पणी

णी

णी

णी : जलयान को चाट-र करने के 24 घंटे के भीतर नौवहन महािनदेशालय को [email protected] पर ईमेल से भेजे गए ऐसे

दU तावेज िशsपग लाईन अथवा चालक के ािधकृत हU ताdरकता- ारा िडजीटल या अ य कार से हU ताd*रत होने चािहएं।

MINISTRY OF SHIPPING

New Delhi, the 21st May, 2018

Subject : Relaxation under Section 406 of the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958, for coastal movement of (a)

EXIM Transhipment Containers and (b) Empty Containers

S.O. 798.—

1.

Whereas the Merchant Shipping Act was enacted in 1958 at a time when container cargo was in a nascent stage

(ISO standards for containers were fixed in 1956). In India, container shipping started only in the year 1980 and

thus the Act predates the business of containers in India. Transhipment of cargo was not a major issue at the

time of enactment, in fact the Act did not envisage such an eventuality.

2.

Whereas the movement of cargo by containers has been rising continuously and is presently more than 20% of

India’s total EXIM trade volumes, and whereas in a dynamic international business situation where

international shipping tariff is highly competitive, in order to achieve better economies of scale, container

business has rapidly evolved from point-to-point to hub-and-spoke model. Thus the containers from smaller

ports are shipped via feeder vessels and then aggregated at a transhipment port from where they are loaded in a

bigger container liner for another transhipment or mainline port. Such a model has not fully evolved in India

and this has resulted in almost 33% of Indian container cargo getting transshipped at foreign ports. The extent

of transhipment is increasing year on year and has increased from 26% in 2007-08 to 33% in 2016-17 (Indian

Ports Association).

3.

Whereas the business model for container shipping has firmly stabilized for the hub and spoke model and has

resulted in the formation of transhipment hubs worldwide.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3757

4.

Whereas the advancement in shipping and container handling technology is leading to the deployment of ever

increasing size of vessels (in excess of 18,000 TEUs) as mother vessels and development of deeper draft

transhipment ports.

5.

Whereas the currently established transhipment ports across the globe are investing further in developing

themselves as modern ports of the future to retain their pre-eminence as transhipment ports.

6.

Whereas India is yet to develop a robust eco-system of large, modern international transhipment ports/hubs with

policy structures and cost advantages to compete with regional hub ports.

7.

Whereas transhipment of Indian cargo at foreign transhipment ports leads to traffic growth at foreign ports and

hence, job creation in other countries, loss of revenue from Indian shippers/ consignees or exporters/importers

to foreign ports in terms of port and logisticscharges, and loss of foreign exchange to foreign ports as the

transhipment revenues and charges are collected from Indian exporters/importers by foreign ports.

8.

Whereas promoting transhipment ports in India would lead to (a) higher competition amongst shipping lines

and a level playing field would reduce freight rates making Indian trade more competitive (b) time and distance

efficient logistics between Indian ports versus foreign ports would also contribute to lowering in feedering cost

(c) shifting of Indian container cargo from foreign ports to Indian ports would lead to higher port profitability

and employment (d) upon establishment of transhipment ecosystem including ports and logistics sector,

enabling small and medium enterprises, service providers to the ports and the shipping sector, Indian ports can

potentially attract cargo originating from and destined to foreign ports, adding to further cargo growth at major

Indian ports and (e) retention of foreign exchange in India.

9.

Whereas the supplychain lag time and transhipment at a foreign port increases cost to the EXIM trade adversely

impacting the competitiveness of Indian traders and manufacturers in the global market.

10.

Whereas there is a requirement to enhance feeder capacity to support movement of EXIM containers by sea

between Indian ports and the Indian transhipment ports.

11.

Whereas availability, time-bound port operations and ease of access to container vessels for feeders and

transhipment of containers within India is a prerequisite for development of transhipment ports in India.

12.

Whereas providing for two-way cargo movement has the potential of reducing the cost of transport, improving

cargo volumes and facilitating investment in shipping fleet.

13.

Whereas sea borne transportation has the potential of simultaneously reducing the per tonne-km cost of

transporting goods as well as reducing the greenhouse gas emission per tonne-km of transporting the goods over

long distances by one-third, compared to rail and road based transportation.

14.

Whereas as per Section 406 of Merchant Shipping Act, 1958, no Indian ship and no other ship chartered by a

citizen of India or a company incorporated in India or a co-operative society registered in India shall be taken to

sea from a port or place within or outside India except under a license granted by the Director General, Shipping

under this section.

15.

Whereas to deal with the business model of transhipment of containers, various countries have taken steps to

allow vessels from foreign flags to trade on their coastal water for transhipment cargoes by relaxing provisions

of their domestic law(s) to boost international trade volume and reduce transportation cost.

16.

Whereas, due to the gradual increase in the share of containerized cargo and imbalance in the imports and

exports from a particular port, there is a perennial problem of empty containers accumulating at some ports and

shortage of containers at others, in terms of size and type. Thus, there is a requirement of movement of empty

containers, of the apt size and type, from one port to another along the Indian coast without adding substantially

to the cost of repositioning of the empty containers.

17.

Whereas persistence of unidirectional demand leads to insufficient investment in the fleet and, as a result, there

is a requirement of movement of empty containers from one port to another along the Indian coast, without

adding substantially to the cost for repositioning of the empty containers.

18.

Whereas as per Notification No. 38 / 2018 - Customs (N.T.) dated 11th May 2018, the Central Board of Indirect

Taxes and Customs has allowed authorized sea carriers for carrying imported goods, export goods, coastal

goods or goods meant for foreign transit or foreign transhipment subject to delivery of an integrated departure

and arrival manifest to the proper officer electronically.

3758

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

19.

Whereas as per existing regulatory framework a foreign ship chartered by a citizen of India or a company

incorporated in India or a registered society registered in India can load an empty or laden container from one

place or port in India and discharge at other place or port in India, only under a license issued by the Director

General of Shipping under Section 406 of the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958.

20.

Whereas transportation of the transhipmentof containers up to the final destination needs to be facilitated to

make Indian ports as major transhipment hubs.

21.

Whereas Indian ships by virtue of the registration of ships at designated ports of registry are deemed approved

for license under Section 406, and have transhipment allowance.

22.

Whereas other ships which may be chartered by citizens of India or a company incorporated in India or a

corporate society registered in India still require to be granted license under Section 406 to be taken to sea from

a port or place within or outside India.

23.

Whereas promotion of trade and ease of doing business in India is one of the major thrust areas of the

Government of India, and there is a need to simplify processes for shipping of cargo and operation of vessels.

24.

Whereas considering the above facts, it is necessary to put in place effective policy measures in public and

national interest to reduce/eliminate transhipment of Indian EXIM container/empty cargo through foreign ports

and reduce the cost for repositioning of the empty containers.

25.

Now, therefore, the Central Government, in exercise of the powers conferred under sub-section (1) of Section

406 of the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958, directs as under:

25.1 The provisions of sub-section (1) of Section 406 shall not apply to the following category of ships, which

may be engaged for the coasting trade of India:

a.

Ships chartered by citizen of India or a company incorporated in India or a cooperative society

registered in Indiawhich satisfies the requirements specified in clause (b) of section 21 in the Act

engaged, for transportation of EXIM laden containers for transhipment; and

b.

Ships chartered by citizen of India or a company incorporated in India or a cooperative society

registered in India which satisfies the requirements specified in clause (b) of section 21 in the

Act engagedfor transportation of empty containers from one port of India to another port of

India.

25.2 This relaxation for ships at Para 25.1 (a) shall be available for:

a.

the laden container consigned on a through Bill of Lading to or from a port outside India for the

purposes of transhipment at an Indian port;

b.

the laden container loaded or unloaded at a port in India for transhipment only; and

c.

the laden container covered by the arrival manifest or departure manifest, as the case may be, for

transhipment.

25.3 The Charterer shall submit information of the chartered vessel to Directorate General of Shipping. The

prescribed format for submitting the information is provided in Annexure I and must be shared with

Directorate General of Shipping by e-mail at [email protected] within 24 hours of the charter of the

vessel. The prescribed format should be either digitally signed or otherwise signed by an authorized

signatory of either the shipping line or the operator.

25.4 Indian law enforcement agencies including inter alia Indian Navy, Coast Guard, State Maritime Police

and Customs, shall be allowed to board such ships any time in the sea for ascertaining the bonafide

credentials of the said ships/crew.

26.

This notification shall come into force with immediate effect, and continue to be valid till it is amended or

withdrawn.

[F. No. SW-15011/2/2016-MG]

P. K. SHARMA, Under Secy.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3759

ANNEXURE 1

Format for information of chartered vessel to be shared with Director General of Shipping

(i)

Name of the charterer

(ii)

Name of ship with IMO No.

(iii)

Flag of the ship

(iv)

Period of charter

Note : the document so shared with Directorate General of Shipping by e-mail at [email protected] within 24 hours of

the charter of the vessel should be either digitally signed or otherwise signed by an authorised signatory of either the

shipping line or the operator.

नई द ली, 22 मई, 2018

िवषय

िवषय

िवषय

िवषय : : : : कृिष

कृिष

कृिष

कृिष , बागवानी

बागवानी

बागवानी

बागवानी, म3 4 य

म3 4 य

म3 4 य

म3 4 यपालन तथा पशुपालन संबंधी सामान के तटीय संचलन हेतु

पालन तथा पशुपालन संबंधी सामान के तटीय संचलन हेतु

पालन तथा पशुपालन संबंधी सामान के तटीय संचलन हेतु

पालन तथा पशुपालन संबंधी सामान के तटीय संचलन हेतु वािणि यक पोत परवहन अिधिनयम

वािणि यक पोत परवहन अिधिनयम

वािणि यक पोत परवहन अिधिनयम

वािणि यक पोत परवहन अिधिनयम

1958 क$ धारा 406 के अंतग)त रयायत।

1958 क$ धारा 406 के अंतग)त रयायत।

1958 क$ धारा 406 के अंतग)त रयायत।

1958 क$ धारा 406 के अंतग)त रयायत।

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 799

799

799

799.—

1.

ज बक, कृषक क आय को बढ़ाने हेतु, कृषक क िवqय को और अिधक बढ़ाने संबंधी आवT यकता है, जहां िवqय मा7ा म8

वांिछत वृिV, सुगम पंच के साथ देश को एक बाजार के Fप म8 खोलने के साथ ही, उ पाद के एक बड़े िहU से को बाजार तक

पंचाने म8 सdम बना कर तथा मु ीकृत करने से हािसल क जा सकती है।

2.

जबक, सरकार क घोिषत मंशा है क कृषक के िलए पूव- िनधा-*रत U थान पर पंच के साथ कृिष I यापार के सुगमीकरण और

संरdण देने क मानिसकता को बाजार पा*रिUथितक तं7 का िवU तार करने, ितभािगय क एक िवU तृत 0ृंखला को शािमल

करने तथा कृषक को सुदूर U थान तक पंच हेतु सश त बनाने वाली मानिसकता म8 प*रवXतत करने क आवT यकता है।

3.

जबक, पहले वह िवपणन णाली भावकारी समझी जाती थी, जो खेत क िनकटतम सीमा के अंदर ही बाजार और लेनदेन

उपलl ध कराती थी, अब इन मापदंड म8 बाजार म8 परU पर जुड़ाव एवं खेत व उपभो ताj के बीच वै यू िडU पस-न को शािमल

करने क आवT यकता है।

4.

जबक, घरेलू खपत और िनया-त बाजार क आवT यकताj को कुशलतापूव-क पूरा करने के िलए खराब होने वाले उ पाद के

भंडारण व प*रवहन म8 कृषक एवं रसद दाताj को सdम बनाने म8 प*रवहन संपक-ता तथा रसद बुिनयादी ढांचे क

आवT यकता होती है।

5.

जबक, जल प*रवहन म8 रेल तथा सड़क माग- से प*रवहन क तुलना म8 माल के प*रवहन के ित टन-कमी लागत म8 छठव8 भाग

तक क कमी लाने के साथ ही साथ लंबी दूरी तक माल के प*रवहन से होने वाले nीनहाउस गैस उ सज-न के ित टन-कमी को

एक ितहाई तक कम करने क dमता है।

6.

जबक, सागरमाला काय-qम क राR Sीय प*रेt य योजना म8 खाiान और संसािधत खाi के तटीय संचलन के िलए 9 िमिलयन

टन ितवष- क dमता का अनुमान कया गया है।

7.

जबक, तटीय पोत प*रवहन सिहत, जल प*रवहन के साधन तुलना मक Fप से प*रवहन को सU ते साधन होने के कारण कृषक

को लाभद Fप से I यापक बाजार तक पंचने म8 सdम करेगा, िवqय यो| य माल क र8ज को बढ़ाएगा एवं घरेलू I यापार के

दायरे को बढ़ाया जा सकेगा।

8.

जबक, िनरंतर बनी ई एक समान मांग के कारण बेड़ म8 पया-] त िनवेश नहL हो पाता और इसके प*रणामU वFप भारतीय

प तन को िवT वसनीय और समयबV सेवाएं दान करने के िलए तटीय जलयान क अपया-] त उपलl धता होती है।

9.

जबक, दुतरफा काग@ संचलन क I यवU था करने से प*रवहन क लागत म8 कमी आने, काग@ क मा7ा म8 वृिV होने और नौवहन

बेड़ म8 िनवेश आसान होने क संभावना है।

10.

जबक, वािणियक पोत प*रवहन अिधिनयम, 1958 क धारा 406 के अनुसार उपयु- त अिधिनयम क धारा 21 के ख^ ड (ख)

म8 िनuदR ट अपेdाj को पूरा करने वाले कसी भारतीय नाग*रक या भारत म8 िनगमीकृत कसी भी कंपनी या भारत म8 पंजीकृत

3760

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

कसी सहकारी-सोसाइटी ारा चाट-र कए गए कसी भारतीय पोत या कसी अ य पोत को इस धारा के तहत महािनदेशक

ारा जारी कए गए लाइस8स के िबना भारत के अंदर या बाहर के कसी U थान या प तन से समु तक नहL ले जाया जाएगा।

11.

जबक, िनuदR ट पंजीकरण प तन पर पोत के पंजीकरण के आधार पर भारतीय पोत धारा 406 के तहत लाइस8स के िलए

अनुमोदत माने गए हW और इनको तटीय I यापार क अनुमित दान क गई है।

12.

जबक, भारतीय नाग*रक या भारत म8 िनगमीकृत कसी कंपनी या भारत म8 पंजीकृत कसी सहकारी-सोसाइटी ारा चाट-र कए

गए कसी अ य पोत को भारत के अंदर या बाहर कसी प तन या U थान से समु तक ले जाने के िलए धारा 406 के तहत

लाइस8स ा] त करने क आवT यकता है और इसिलए इनको तटीय I यापार करने क अनुमित है।

13.

जबक, भारत म8 I यापार को ो सािहत करना और I यापार करने को आसान बनाना भारत सरकार ारा बल दए जाने वाले

मुख dे7 म8 से एक है, और काग@ क िशsपग और जलयान के चालन क qया को सरल बनाने क आवT यकता है।

14.

अत: के सरकार वािण य पोत प*रवहन अिधिनयम, 1958 (58 का 44) क धारा 406 के परंतुक के अंतग-त द त शि तय

का योग करते ए इसे जनता के िहत म8 आवT यक एवं लाभकारक मानते ए एतत ारा िनदxश देती है क:

14.1 िवदेश I यापार महािनदेशक, वािण य एवं उiोग मं7ालय ारा अपनाए गए एवं यथा संशोिधत अनुबंध-2 के अनुसार

भारतीय I यापार वग}करण (आईटीसी), हाम@नाइ ड णाली (एचएस) म8 िवXनदR ट कृिष, म U यपालन, कृिष उ पाद

एवं बागवानी संबंधी सामान के समु ारा प*रवहन के िलए तटीय I यापार म8 शािमल होने वाले भारतीय पोत तथा

भारत के नाग*रक या भारत म8 िनगिमत कसी कंपनी अथवा भारत म8 पंजीकृत सहकारी सोसाइटी ारा चाटxड कए

गए पोत धारा 406 क उप-धारा (I) के ावधान लागू नहL हगे।

14.2 पैरा 14.1 पर पोत के िलए छूट इस शत- के अधीन होगी जब पैरा 14.1 के अनुसार िवXनदR ट कृिष, म U यपालन, कृिष

उ पाद एवं बागवानी संबंधी सामान के तटीय I यापार क मा7ा ऑनबोड- िशप काग@ का यूनतम 50 ितशत हो।

14.3 पैरा 14.1 और 14.2 पर पोत के िलए छूट इन शत~ के अधीन भी होगी, जब चाट-र/या7ा संबंधी जानकारी नौवहन

महािनदेशक को U तुत क गई हो। जानकारी U तुत करने के िलए िनधा-*रत फामxट अनुबंध

अनुबंध

अनुबंध

अनुबंध-I पर उपलl ध कराया गया

है तथा इसे भारत म8 प तन से पोत के चलने के कम से कम 24 घंटे पहले [email protected] ई-मेल पर नौवहन

महािनदेशक के साथ साझा करना होगा। िनधा-*रत फामxट पर िशsपग कंपनी या चालक म8 से कसी एक के ािधकृत

हU ताdरकता- ारा िडिजटल अथवा अ य Fप म8 हU ताd*रत होने चािहए।

14.4 उपरो त छूट िनr निलिखत शत- के अधीन होगी क भारतीय नौसेना, तट रdक, रा य समु ी पुिलस एवं सीमा शु क के

साथ-साथ भारतीय कानून वत-न एजेि सय को उ त पोत/qू के वाU तिवक प*रचय प7 क पुिy करने के िलए कसी

भी समय समु म8 इन पोत पर बोड- करने क अनुमित होगी।

15.

यह आदेश त काल भाव से लागू होगा और इसे अगले आदेश तक वैध माना जाएगा, जब तक इसम8 संशोधन न कया जाए

अथवा वािपस न िलया जाए।

16.

इसे सdम ािधकारी के अनुमोदन से जारी कया जाता है।

[फा. सं. एसडl  यू-14020/5/2009-एमजी/एसए(ख^ ड-9)]

पी. के. शमा-, अवर सिचव

अनुबंध

अनुबंध

अनुबंध

अनुबंध-I

नौवहन महािनदेशालय के साथ साझा क$ जाने वाली जानकारी के िलए फाम1

नौवहन महािनदेशालय के साथ साझा क$ जाने वाली जानकारी के िलए फाम1

नौवहन महािनदेशालय के साथ साझा क$ जाने वाली जानकारी के िलए फाम1

नौवहन महािनदेशालय के साथ साझा क$ जाने वाली जानकारी के िलए फाम1ट

(i)

मािलक/आपरेटर का नाम और प तन

(ii)

आई एम ओ सं. सिहत पोत का नाम

(iii)

पोत का N वत

(iv)

चाट-र क अविध

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3761

ट2 प

ट2 प

ट2 प

ट2 पणी

णी

णी

णी :

नौवहन महािनदेशक के साथ ई मेल [email protected] पर साझा कए गए दU तावेज पर नौवहन कr पनी अथवा आपरेटर

के ािधकृत हU ताdरकता- ारा िडिजटल अथवा अ य Fप से हU ताdर कए जाने चािहएं।

अनुबंध

अनुबंध

अनुबंध

अनुबंध-2

कृिष

कृिष

कृिष

कृिष, म3 4 य

म3 4 य

म3 4 य

म3 4 यपालन

पालन

पालन

पालन, पशुपालन और बागवानी उ3 पा

पशुपालन और बागवानी उ3 पा

पशुपालन और बागवानी उ3 पा

पशुपालन और बागवानी उ3 पाद के अ@ त

द के अ@ त

द के अ@ त

द के अ@ तग)त िवचारणीय सामान

ग)त िवचारणीय सामान

ग)त िवचारणीय सामान

ग)त िवचारणीय सामान

1.

1.

1.

1.

िविभ@ न

िविभ@ न

िविभ@ न

िविभ@ न 4

4

4

4-िडिजट

िडिजट

िडिजट

िडिजट, 6-िडिजट और 8 िडिजट एचएस कोड सिहत 2

िडिजट और 8 िडिजट एचएस कोड सिहत 2

िडिजट और 8 िडिजट एचएस कोड सिहत 2

िडिजट और 8 िडिजट एचएस कोड सिहत 2-िडिजट एचएस

िडिजट एचएस

िडिजट एचएस

िडिजट एचएस कोड

कोड

कोड

कोड

1.1

02- मांस और खाi मांस ऑफल

1.2

03- मछली और qU टेिशयन तथा मोलU क एवं अ य ए वे*टक इ वट€ेस

1.3

04- डेयरी उ पाद, पdी के अ^ डे, ाकृितक शहद, पशु मूल के खाi पदाथ-, जो कहL और

शािमल नहL हW।

1.4

07- सिlजयां और कुछ मूल और कंद; खाi

1.5

08- फल और नस, खाi; साइSस फल अथवा खरबूजे के िछलके

1.6

09- कॉफ, चाय, मेट और मसाले

1.7

10- अनाज

1.8

11- िमsलग उiोग के उ पाद; मा ट, U टाच- इ यूिलन, गे‚ं का लासा

1.9

12-तेल के बीज, िचकने फल; िविवध अनाज, बीज और फल, औiोिगक अथवा औषधीय पौधे;

भूसा और चारा

1.10

14- वेिजटेबल ] लेgटग मैटी*रयल; जो कहL ओर िविनuदR ट अथवा शािमल न हो।

1.11

15- पशुj अथवा सl जी क चब} और तेल तथा उनक िवपाटन चब}

2.

2.

2.

2.

िविभ@ न

िविभ@ न

िविभ@ न

िविभ@ न 6

6

6

6- िडिजट और 8 िडिजट एचएस कोड सिहत 4

िडिजट और 8 िडिजट एचएस कोड सिहत 4

िडिजट और 8 िडिजट एचएस कोड सिहत 4

िडिजट और 8 िडिजट एचएस कोड सिहत 4-िडिजट एचएस कोड

िडिजट एचएस कोड

िडिजट एचएस कोड

िडिजट एचएस कोड

2.1

5101 से 5105 – ऊन, धागा बनने से पूव-

2.2

5201 से 5203 – सूत, धागा/ सूत बनने से पूव-

2.3

5301 से 5305 – वेिजटेबल टै सटाइल फाइबर जैसे पटसन, हैr प और जूट।

New Delhi, the 22nd May, 2018

Subject : Relaxation under Section 406 of the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958, for coastal movement

of agriculture, horticulture, fisheries and animal husbandry commodities.

S.O. 799.—

1.

Whereas to enhance farmers’ income, there is the related need to enhance the selling volume of the

farmers, wherein the desired increase in selling volume can be achieved by enabling a large part of

the produce to reach markets and be monetized; besides opening up the country as one market with

eased access.

2.

Whereas it is the stated intent of the Government calling for a mind-set shift from facilitating and

protecting agricultural trade at predefined locations accessible to farmers, towards one that expands

the market ecosystem, encompasses a wider array of participants and empowers farmers to access

locations further afield is required.

3762

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

3.

Whereas earlier, a marketing system was considered effective if it provided for market yards and

transactions within immediate range of farms, the yardstick today needs to include, the

interconnectivity between markets and the value dispersion between farms and consumers.

4.

Whereas the transport connectivity and logistics infrastructure needs to enable farmers and logistics

service providers to store and transport perishable products to serve the domestic consumption and

export markets efficiently.

5.

Whereas water borne transportation has the potential of simultaneously reducing the per tonne-km

cost of transporting goods to one-sixth as well as reducing the greenhouse gas emission per tonne-

km of transporting the goods over long distances by one-third, compared to rail and road based

transportation.

6.

Whereas the National Perspective Plan of the Sagarmala Programme estimates a potential of more

than 9 Million Tonnes Per Annum for coastal movement of food grains and processed food.

7.

Whereas water borne transportation modes, including coastal shipping, being comparatively cheaper

modes of transport would enable farmers to access a larger market profitably, widen the range of

goods which can be marketed, and lengthen the distances over which domestic trade can be

conducted.

8.

Whereas persistence of unidirectional demand leads to insufficient investment in the fleet and, as a

result, inadequate availability of coastal vessels for providing reliable and time bound services to

Indian ports.

9.

Whereas providing for two-way cargo movement has the potential of reducing the cost of transport,

improving cargo volumes and facilitating investment in fleet.

10.

Whereas as per Section 406 of Merchant Shipping Act, 1958, no Indian ship and no other ship

chartered by a citizen of India or a company incorporated in India or a cooperative society registered

in India which satisfies the requirements specified in clause (b) of section 21 of the above state Act

shall be taken to sea from a port or place within or outside India except under a license granted by

the Director General under this section.

11.

Whereas Indian ships by virtue of the registration of ships at designated ports of registry are deemed

approved for license under Section 406, and have allowance for coasting trade.

12.

Whereas other ships which may be chartered by citizens of India or a company incorporated in India

or a corporate society registered in India still require to be granted license under Section 406 to be

taken to sea from a port or place within or outside India and therefore have allowance for coasting

trade.

13.

Whereas promotion of trade and ease of doing business in India is one of the major thrust areas of

the Government of India, and there is a need to simplify processes for shipping of cargo and

operation of vessels.

14.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred upon it under proviso of section 406 of the

Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 (44 of 58), the Central Government being of the opinion that it is

necessary and expedient in the public interest, hereby directs that:

14.1

The provisions of sub-section (1) of section 406 shall not apply to Indian ships and ships

chartered by citizen of India or a company incorporated in India or a cooperative society

registered in India to engage in the coasting trade of India for the carriage by sea of

agricultural, fishery, farm produce and horticultural commodities specified in the Indian

Trade Classification (ITC), Harmonized System (HS) as per Annexure 2, as adopted and

modified by the Director General of Foreign Trade, Ministry of Commerce and Industry.

14.2

The relaxation for ships at Para 14.1 is subject to the quantity of coasting trade of

agricultural, fisheries, farm produce and horticultural commodities specified as per Para

14.1 contributing to at least 50 percent of the cargo onboard the ship.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3763

14.3

The relaxation for ships at Para 14.1 and 14.2 shall further be subject to the conditions

that the information about the charter/voyage will be submitted to the Director General of

Shipping. The prescribed format for submitting the information is provided in Annexure

1 and must be shared with the Director General of shipping by e-mail at [email protected]

at least 24 hours prior to sail of ship from the port in India. The prescribed format should

be either digitally or otherwise signed by an authorized signatory of either the shipping

line or the operator.

14.4

The aforesaid relaxation shall be subject to the following condition that Indian law

enforcement agencies including inter alia Indian Navy, Coast Guard, State Maritime

Police and Customs, shall be allowed to board such ships any time in the sea for

ascertaining the bonafide credentials of the said ships/crew.

15.

This order shall come into force with immediate effect, and continue to be valid till further order,

unless otherwise amended or withdrawn.

16.

This issues with the approval of competent authority.

[F. No. SW-14020/5/2009-MG/SA(Vol.9)]

P. K. SHARMA, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE 1

Format for information to be shared with

Director General of Shipping

(i)

Name of owner/ operator and address

(ii)

Name of ship with IMO No.

(iii)

Flag of the ship

(iv)

Period of charter

Note:

The document so shared with the Director General of Shipping by e-mail at [email protected]should be either

digitally or otherwise signed by an authorized signatory of either the shipping line or the operator.

ANNEXURE 2

Commodities to be considered under agricultural, fisheries, animal husbandry and horticulture products

1.

2-digit HS codes, inclusive of the various 4-digit, 6-digit and 8-digit HS codes

1.1

02 – Meat and edible meat offal

1.2

03 – Fish and crustaceans, molluscs and other aquatic invertebrates

1.3

04 – Dairy produce, bird’s eggs, natural honey, edible products of animal origin, not elsewhere

included

1.4

07 – Vegetables and certain roots and tubers; edible

1.5

08 – Fruits and nuts, edible; peel of citrus fruits or melons

1.6

09 – Coffee, tea, mate and spices

3764

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1.7

10 – Cereals

1.8

11 – Products of the milling industry; malt, starch, inulin, wheat gluten

1.9

12 – Oil seeds and oleaginous fruits; miscellaneous grains, seeds and fruit, industrial or medicinal

plants; straw and fodder

1.10

14 – Vegetable plaiting materials; not elsewhere specified or included

1.11

15 – Animal or vegetable fats and oils and their cleavage products

2.

4-digit HS codes, inclusive of the various 6-digit and 8-digit HS codes

2.1

5101 to 5105 – Wool, prior to yarn formation

2.2

5201 to 5203 – Cotton, prior to yarn/thread formation

2.3

5301 to 5305 – Vegetable textile fibers such as flax, hemp and jute

isVªksfy;e vkSj izkÑfrd xSl ea=ky;

ubZ fnYyh] 4 ebZ] 2018

dk-vk- 800.—dsUnzh; ljdkj us isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbZu ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½

vf/kfu;e] 1962 ¼1962 dk 50½ ¼ftls blesa blds i'pkr~ mä vf/kfu;e dgk x;k gSa½ dh /kkjk 3 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ ds

v/khu tkjh dh xbZ Hkkjr ljdkj ds isVªksfy;e vkSj izkÑfrd xSl ea=ky; dh vf/klwpuk la[;k dk-vk- 2224 rkjh[k 14

flrEcj] 2017 tks Hkkjr ds jkti=] rkjh[k 17 flrEcj & 23 flrEcj 2017] esa izdkf’kr dh xbZ Fkh }kjk ml vf/klwpuk ls

layXu vuqlwph esa fofufnZ"V Hkwfe esa egkjk"Vª jkT; esa ftyk vgenuxj esa rkYkqdk dksijxkao dks;yh & vgenuxj &

lksykiqj isVªksfy;e ifjogu ds fy, bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs’ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbiykbZu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, mi;ksx ds

vf/kdkj ds vtZu ds vius vk’k; dh ?kks"k.kk dh Fkh (

vkSj mä jkti= vf/kfu;e dh izfr;ka turk dks rkjh[k 10 tuojh] 2018 rd miyC/k djk dh xbZ Fkh (

vkSj l{ke izkf/kdkjh us mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ ds v/khu dsUæh; ljdkj dks fjiksVZ dh gS (

vkSj dsUæh; ljdkj us] mä fjiksVZ ij fopkj djus ds i'pkr~ vkSj ;g lek/kku gks tkus ij fd mä Hkwfe

ikbiykbZu fcNkus ds fy, visf{kr gS] mlesa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu djus dk fofu’p; fd;k gS (

vr% vc] dsUæh; ljdkj mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk izn~Ùk 'kfä;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, ;g

?kks"k.kk djrh gS fd bl vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa fofufnZ"V Hkwfe esa ikbiykbZu fcNkus ds fy, mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj

dk vtZu fd;k tk, (

vkSj ljdkj mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi&/kkjk ¼4½ }kjk izn~Ùk 'kfä;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] ;g funsZ’k nsrh gS

fd mä Hkwfe esa mi;ksx dk vf/kdkj bl ?kks"k.kk ds izdk’ku dh rkjh[k ls dsUæh; ljdkj esa fufgr gksus ds ctk,] lHkh

foYyaxeksa ls eqä gksdj bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs’ku fyfeVsM esa fufgr gksxh A

isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbZu vf/kfu;e] 1962 dh /kkjk 10 ds v/khu fdlh Hkh {kfriwfrZ ds fy, bafM;u vkW;y

dkWiksZjs’ku fyfeVsM iw.kZr;k mÙkjnk;h gksxh vkSj ikbiykbZu ls lEcfU/kr fdlh Hkh ekeys ij dsUæh; ljdkj ds fo#) dksbZ

okn nkok ;k dkuwuh dk;Zokgh ugha gks ldsxhA

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3765

vuqlwPkh

Rglhy & dksijxkao

ftyk & vgenuxj

jkT; & egkjk"Vª

ekStk @xzke

losZ @ Cykd @ la-

¼IyksV la-½

lc&Mho&la-

{ks=Qy

gsDVs;j

vkjs

oxZ ehVj

1

2

3

4

5

6

lkoyxkao

113

00

22

60

112

00

13

45

121@1

00

02

00

121@2

00

00

58

116@2

00

11

05

111

00

14

45

109

00

14

14

27@1

00

05

50

27@2

00

07

10

27@4

00

06

80

28@1

00

00

74

28@3

00

03

37

25@1

00

05

68

25@2

00

00

02

22

00

03

32

21

00

04

12

20

00

05

31

17@1

00

06

46

14

00

06

41

13

00

05

59

9

00

06

30

8

00

08

78

7

00

03

83

5

00

00

20

6

00

15

58

3@2

00

07

46

2

00

28

68

fryo.kh

16@2

00

40

37

3766

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

14@1

00

16

74

14@2

00

19

14

13

00

17

38

59@1

00

04

93

59@2

00

03

80

60

00

09

75

61

00

01

91

86

00

07

40

87

00

06

29

88@1

00

06

92

89@2

00

03

46

89@3

00

03

45

91@1

00

06

80

91@3

00

03

75

93@1

00

03

49

94

00

12

38

95

00

03

39

96

00

00

20

101@2

00

00

71

101@3

00

09

32

101@4

00

10

12

101@5

00

09

65

108

00

08

37

109@1

00

04

13

109@2

00

03

75

111

00

09

21

113

00

08

39

114

00

03

25

117@1

00

27

23

117@2

00

16

74

133

00

30

08

132@1

00

20

84

132@2

00

22

50

216@1

00

00

20

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3767

131@1

00

08

82

131@2

00

29

61

218

00

19

10

219@2

00

08

71

219@4

00

08

44

220@1

00

05

79

221@1

00

41

21

221@2

00

07

66

227@1

00

02

63

vkisxkao

57@1

00

14

64

57@4

00

03

57

57@5

00

04

33

55

00

12

96

54

00

06

37

53

00

08

85

52@1

00

05

46

52@2

00

06

93

52@3

00

05

48

50

00

10

61

160@1

00

09

35

160@2

00

07

04

162@1

00

14

75

162@2

00

02

00

163@2

00

00

20

161@2

00

03

46

165

00

06

79

166

00

05

28

167

00

05

37

155@1

00

07

54

154

00

07

11

183

00

07

85

153

00

10

16

152@2

00

00

57

185

00

14

27

3768

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

186

00

03

07

147@4

00

00

01

147@5

00

12

37

147@6

00

16

09

188

00

07

78

145@1

00

44

84

145@6

00

08

05

145@7

00

20

09

192@1

00

13

43

193@1

00

14

96

193@2

00

01

25

193@3

00

22

49

201@2

00

05

85

201@3

00

05

59

201@5

00

06

11

201@6

00

00

67

201@8

00

05

23

200@1

00

20

17

?kks;sxkao

43

00

36

28

44@4

00

32

08

45@1

00

05

68

45@2

00

05

89

45@3

00

06

28

46@2

00

07

66

Rkysxkao eys

70@2

00

01

97

61@1

00

14

90

61@2

00

30

40

60@2

00

01

78

62

00

10

74

63

00

11

99

64

00

12

57

65

00

14

09

55

00

03

09

54@1

00

11

60

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3769

54@2

00

14

84

53@1

00

14

56

53@2

00

04

49

53@3

00

04

28

53@4

00

04

32

52@1

00

09

08

52@2

00

13

11

52@3

00

20

54

49

00

00

78

51

00

10

90

111

00

12

44

110

00

08

00

109

00

12

84

108

00

12

35

105

00

23

28

104

00

12

98

119@1

00

19

43

119@2

00

33

18

118@1

00

07

33

120@2

00

07

35

125@1

00

05

35

125@2

00

11

47

125@3

00

05

15

125@4

00

06

21

125@5

00

05

19

125@6

00

09

33

125@7

00

04

99

125@8

00

04

35

125@9

00

04

49

136@1

00

11

09

136@3

00

18

78

136@4

00

11

02

137

00

03

67

139

00

07

55

3770

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/6/2018-ओआर-I/ई-23678]

पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव

MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS

New Delhi, the 4th May, 2018

S.O. 800.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural

Gas 2224 dated the 14th September, 2017, issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals

Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act),

Published in the Gazette of India dated the 17th September-23rd September 2017, the Central Government declared its

intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose

of laying Koyali-Ahmednagar-Solapur Pipeline for the transportation of Petroleum Items in Taluka Kopargaon in

Ahmednagar District in the State of Maharashtra by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public up to 10th January,

2018;

And whereas the competent authority has under sub-section (1) of Section 6 of said act submitted report to the

Central Government;

And Whereas the Central Government, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said

land is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of user therein;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is

hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby directs that right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the

Central Government, vest on the date of publication of the declaration, in Indian Oil Corporation Limited, free from all

encumbrances.

Indian Oil Corporation Limited shall be exclusively liable for any compensation in terms of Section 10 of the

P & MP Act, 1962 and no suit, claim or legal proceeding would lie against the Central Government on any matter

relating to the pipeline.

SCHEDULE

Tehsil:- Kopargaon

District:- Ahmadnagar

State :- Maharashtra

Mouja / Village

Survey/Block No.

Sub-Div-No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

Sawalgaon

113

00

22

60

112

00

13

45

121/1

00

02

00

121/2

00

00

58

116/2

00

11

05

111

00

14

45

109

00

14

14

27/1

00

05

50

140

00

04

11

141

00

00

24

144

00

00

20

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3771

27/2

00

07

10

27/4

00

06

80

28/1

00

00

74

28/3

00

03

37

25/1

00

05

68

25/2

00

00

02

22

00

03

32

21

00

04

12

20

00

05

31

17/1

00

06

46

14

00

06

41

13

00

05

59

9

00

06

30

8

00

08

78

7

00

03

83

5

00

00

20

6

00

15

58

3/2

00

07

46

2

00

28

68

Tilvani

16/2

00

40

37

14/1

00

16

74

14/2

00

19

14

13

00

17

38

59/1

00

04

93

59/2

00

03

80

60

00

09

75

61

00

01

91

86

00

07

40

87

00

06

29

88/1

00

06

92

89/2

00

03

46

89/3

00

03

45

91/1

00

06

80

91/3

00

03

75

93/1

00

03

49

94

00

12

38

95

00

03

39

96

00

00

20

101/2

00

00

71

3772

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

101/3

00

09

32

101/4

00

10

12

101/5

00

09

65

108

00

08

37

109/1

00

04

13

109/2

00

03

75

111

00

09

21

113

00

08

39

114

00

03

25

117/1

00

27

23

117/2

00

16

74

133

00

30

08

132/1

00

20

84

132/2

00

22

50

216/1

00

00

20

131/1

00

08

82

131/2

00

29

61

218

00

19

10

219/2

00

08

71

219/4

00

08

44

220/1

00

05

79

221/1

00

41

21

221/2

00

07

66

227/1

00

02

63

Aapegaon

57/1

00

14

64

57/4

00

03

57

57/5

00

04

33

55

00

12

96

54

00

06

37

53

00

08

85

52/1

00

05

46

52/2

00

06

93

52/3

00

05

48

50

00

10

61

160/1

00

09

35

160/2

00

07

04

162/1

00

14

75

162/2

00

02

00

163/2

00

00

20

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3773

161/2

00

03

46

165

00

06

79

166

00

05

28

167

00

05

37

155/1

00

07

54

154

00

07

11

183

00

07

85

153

00

10

16

152/2

00

00

57

185

00

14

27

186

00

03

07

147/4

00

00

01

147/5

00

12

37

147/6

00

16

09

188

00

07

78

145/1

00

44

84

145/6

00

08

05

145/7

00

20

09

192/1

00

13

43

193/1

00

14

96

193/2

00

01

25

193/3

00

22

49

201/2

00

05

85

201/3

00

05

59

201/5

00

06

11

201/6

00

00

67

201/8

00

05

23

200/1

00

20

17

Ghoyegaon

43

00

36

28

44/4

00

32

08

45/1

00

05

68

45/2

00

05

89

45/3

00

06

28

46/2

00

07

66

Talegaon Male

70/2

00

01

97

61/1

00

14

90

61/2

00

30

40

60/2

00

01

78

62

00

10

74

3774

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

63

00

11

99

64

00

12

57

65

00

14

09

55

00

03

09

54/1

00

11

60

54/2

00

14

84

53/1

00

14

56

53/2

00

04

49

53/3

00

04

28

53/4

00

04

32

52/1

00

09

08

52/2

00

13

11

52/3

00

20

54

49

00

00

78

51

00

10

90

111

00

12

44

110

00

08

00

109

00

12

84

108

00

12

35

105

00

23

28

104

00

12

98

119/1

00

19

43

119/2

00

33

18

118/1

00

07

33

120/2

00

07

35

125/1

00

05

35

125/2

00

11

47

125/3

00

05

15

125/4

00

06

21

125/5

00

05

19

125/6

00

09

33

125/7

00

04

99

125/8

00

04

35

125/9

00

04

49

136/1

00

11

09

136/3

00

18

78

136/4

00

11

02

137

00

03

67

139

00

07

55

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3775

140

00

04

11

141

00

00

24

144

00

00

20

[F. No. R-11025(11)/6/2018-OR-I/E-23678]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

ubZ fnYyh] 4 ebZ] 2018

dk-vk- 801.—dsUnzh; ljdkj us isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbZu ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½

vf/kfu;e] 1962 ¼1962 dk 50½ ¼ftls blesa blds i'pkr~ mä vf/kfu;e dgk x;k gSa½ dh /kkjk 3 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ ds

v/khu tkjh dh xbZ Hkkjr ljdkj ds isVªksfy;e vkSj izkÑfrd xSl ea=ky; dh vf/klwpuk la[;k dk-vk- 2216 v©j 2217

rkjh[k 14 flrEcj] 2017 tks Hkkjr ds jkti=] rkjh[k 17 flrEcj&23 flrEcj 2017] esa izdkf’kr dh xbZ Fkh }kjk ml

vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa fofufnZ"V Hkwfe esa egkjk"Vª jkT; esa ftyk ukfld esa rkYkqdk ukanxko dks;yh & vgenuxj

& lksykiqj isVªksfy;e ifjogu ds fy, bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs’ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbiykbZu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, mi;ksx

ds vf/kdkj ds vtZu ds vius vk’k; dh ?kks"k.kk dh Fkh (

vkSj mä jkti= vf/kfu;e dh izfr;ka turk dks rkjh[k 27 fnlacj] 2017 rd miyC/k djk nh xbZ Fkh (

vkSj l{ke izkf/kdkjh us mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ ds v/khu dsUæh; ljdkj dks fjiksVZ dh gS (

vkSj dsUæh; ljdkj us] mä fjiksVZ ij fopkj djus ds i'pkr~ vkSj ;g lek/kku gks tkus ij fd mä Hkwfe

ikbiykbZu fcNkus ds fy, visf{kr gS] mlesa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu djus dk fofu’p; fd;k gS (

vr% vc] dsUæh; ljdkj mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk izn~Ùk 'kfä;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, ;g

?kks"k.kk djrh gS fd bl vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa fofufnZ"V Hkwfe esa ikbiykbZu fcNkus ds fy, mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj

dk vtZu fd;k tk, (

vkSj ljdkj mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi&/kkjk ¼4½ }kjk izn~Ùk 'kfä;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] ;g funsZ’k nsrh gS

fd mä Hkwfe esa mi;ksx dk vf/kdkj bl ?kks"k.kk ds izdk’ku dh rkjh[k ls dsUæh; ljdkj esa fufgr gksus ds ctk,] lHkh

foYyaxeksa ls eqä gksdj bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs’ku fyfeVsM esa fufgr gksxh A

isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbZu vf/kfu;e] 1962 dh /kkjk 10 ds v/khu fdlh Hkh {kfriwfrZ ds fy, bafM;u vkW;y

dkWiksZjs’ku fyfeVsM iw.kZr;k mÙkjnk;h gksxh vkSj ikbiykbZu ls lEcfU/kr fdlh Hkh ekeys ij dsUæh; ljdkj ds fo#) dksbZ

okn nkok ;k dkuwuh dk;Zokgh ugha gks ldsxhA

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

rglhy%&ukanxko

ftyk%& ukfld

jkT;%& egkjk"Vª

ekSts @xzke

losZ @ Cykd @ la-

¼IyksV la-½

lc&Mho&la-

{ks=Qy

gsDVj

vkj

oxZ ehVj

1

2

3

4

5

6

dâh

55

00

74

56

51@1

00

37

00

46@1

00

01

97

46@2

00

12

02

45

00

10

50

39

00

09

34

38

00

00

20

40

00

06

32

41

00

03

23

42

00

00

89

3776

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

33

00

15

78

lVk.ks

6@7

00

00

09

6@18

00

03

42

6@10

00

04

69

6@5

00

04

41

6@14

00

04

82

6@1

00

04

41

7@2

00

12

11

7@5

00

02

93

7@6@v@1

00

07

93

7@6@v@2

00

08

37

7@8

00

11

10

7@9

00

03

37

8@1@1@v, c, d

00

12

94

8@1@2@c

00

05

42

8@1@2@v

00

06

67

8@3@c

00

06

69

8@3 d

00

06

96

9@2

00

10

29

9@3

00

09

37

9@4

00

16

93

10@1@c@2

00

08

92

10@1@v

00

06

80

10@1@c@4

00

07

11

10@3

00

06

55

11@4

00

05

49

13@2

00

01

01

13@3

00

00

55

14@1

00

05

44

14@2

00

06

86

14@3

00

16

31

14@7

00

09

41

14@11

00

05

81

14@12

00

34

31

14@13

00

00

41

15

00

42

52

oatkjokMh

237@1 iSdh

00

50

81

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3777

237@2

00

42

20

236

00

19

03

193

00

06

16

192

00

04

61

191

00

04

52

190@2

00

05

98

185

00

09

14

183

00

04

63

182

00

03

56

179

00

07

59

165

00

17

97

166

00

03

83

153@1

00

14

14

153@2

00

79

64

139

00

49

18

138@1

00

01

80

129@7

00

14

53

128

00

26

53

126

00

00

39

127

00

19

09

119

00

31

19

124@1

00

34

15

121

00

26

72

Ukkxkiqj

12@1

00

20

55

12@2@1@2@v

00

17

85

12@2@1@2@c

00

07

24

12@3

00

07

82

12@4

00

11

03

12@8@c

00

08

21

12@8@v

00

08

20

12@11@1

00

07

26

9@1@v, c@2

00

17

92

9@1@c@1

00

07

57

9@2@3@4@1@ c@2

00

02

74

9@2@3@4@1@v

00

09

82

9@2@3@4@2@v@2@1

00

07

18

9@2@3@4@2@v@2@2

00

03

62

3778

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

8@2@v@1

00

06

50

8@1@v@2

00

06

46

8@1@ c

00

04

12

8@1@d

00

02

72

8@3@c

00

02

19

7@1@1@1

00

10

15

7@1@1@2

00

09

82

6@2@v@1@2

00

04

91

6@2@v@1@1

00

04

86

6@3@v@2

00

04

95

6@3@v@1

00

04

86

5@1@2@5@6@v@1

00

05

16

5@1@2@5@6@v@2

00

14

29

4@2@1@v

4@4

00

00

08

09

51

94

3@1@2@d

00

22

86

32

00

24

08

31@1 iS

00

11

64

38@v@1

00

09

30

38@v@2

00

09

07

49@1@1

00

11

59

50v@1

00

09

22

51@5

00

12

92

51@2

00

14

36

52@1@v@1@M

00

06

88

52@1@v@1@v

00

05

51

52@6@v

00

03

49

52@9

00

03

49

52@8

00

07

46

53@1@v@1

00

13

33

53@1@v@3

00

12

47

58@1@d

00

13

57

58@1@c

00

12

42

59@1

00

05

87

59@2

00

07

33

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3779

59@1@3

00

06

38

59@4

00

06

87

60@3@v@2

00

03

14

60@2@1

00

17

85

60@2@2

00

12

78

61@1@1@d

00

14

61

61@1@1@c

00

07

70

61@1@1@V

00

03

74

61@1@1@M

00

04

60

63@1@d@2@v

00

11

53

63@1@d@2@ c

00

07

01

63@2

00

15

99

63@3

00

24

25

63@1@c@2

00

00

78

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/6/2018-ओआर-I/ई-23678]

पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 4th May, 2018

S.O. 801.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural

Gas vide S.O. No. 2216 and 2217 dated the 14th September, 2017, issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the

Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred

to as the said Act), Published in the Gazette of India dated the 17th September-23rd September 2017, the Central

Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that

notification for the purpose of laying Koyali-Ahmednagar-Solapur Pipeline for the transportation of Petroleum

Products in Taluka Nandgaon in Nashik District in the State of Maharashtra by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public up to 27th December,

2017;

And whereas the competent authority has under sub-section (1) of Section 6 of said act submitted report to the

Central Government;

And Whereas the Central Government, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said

land is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of user therein;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is

hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby directs that right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the

Central Government, vest on the date of publication of the declaration, in Indian Oil Corporation Limited, free from all

encumbrances.

Indian Oil Corporation Limited shall be exclusively liable for any compensation in terms of Section 10 of the

P & MP Act, 1962 and no suit, claim or legal proceeding would lie against the Central Government on any matter

relating to the pipeline.

3780

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

SCHEDULE

Tehsil:- Nandgaon

District:- Nashik

State :- Maharashtra

Mouje / Village

Survey/Block No.

Sub-Div-No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

Karhi

55

00

74

56

51/1

00

37

00

46/1

00

01

97

46/2

00

12

02

45

00

10

50

39

00

09

34

38

00

00

20

40

00

06

32

41

00

03

23

42

00

00

89

33

00

15

78

Satane

6/7

00

00

09

6/18

00

03

42

6/10

00

04

69

6/5

00

04

41

6/14

00

04

82

6/1

00

04

41

7/2

00

12

11

7/5

00

02

93

7/6/A/1

00

07

93

7/6/A/2

00

08

37

7/8

00

11

10

7/9

00

03

37

8/1/1/A, B, C

00

12

94

8/1/2/B

00

05

42

8/1/2/A

00

06

67

8/3/B

00

06

69

8/3/C

00

06

96

9/2

00

10

29

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3781

9/3

00

09

37

9/4

00

16

93

10/1/B/2

00

08

92

10/1/A

00

06

80

10/1/B/4

00

07

11

10/3

00

06

55

11/4

00

05

49

13/2

00

01

01

13/3

00

00

55

14/1

00

05

44

14/2

00

06

86

14/3

00

16

31

14/7

00

09

41

14/11

00

05

81

14/12

00

34

31

14/13

00

00

41

15

00

42

52

Wanjarwadi

237/1 PAIKY

00

50

81

237/2

00

42

20

236

00

19

03

193

00

06

16

192

00

04

61

191

00

04

52

190/2

00

05

98

185

00

09

14

183

00

04

63

182

00

03

56

179

00

07

59

165

00

17

97

166

00

03

83

153/1

00

14

14

153/2

00

79

64

139

00

49

18

138/1

00

01

80

3782

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

129/7

00

14

53

128

00

26

53

126

00

00

39

127

00

19

09

119

00

31

19

124/1

00

34

15

121

00

26

72

Nagapur

12/1

00

20

55

12/2/1/2/A

00

17

85

12/2/1/2/B

00

07

24

12/3

00

07

82

12/4

00

11

03

12/8/ B

00

08

21

12/8/ A

00

08

20

12/11/1

00

07

26

9/1/ A & 9/1/ B/2

00

17

92

9/1/ B/1

00

07

57

9/2/3/4/1/ B/2

00

02

74

9/2/3/4/1/ A

00

09

82

9/2/3/4/2/ A/2/1

00

07

18

9/2/3/4/2/ A/2/2

00

03

62

8/2/A/1

00

06

50

8/1/A/2

00

06

46

8/1/B

00

04

12

8/1/C

00

02

72

8/3/B

00

02

19

7/1/1/1

00

10

15

7/1/1/2

00

09

82

6/2/A/1/2

00

04

91

6/2/A/1/1

00

04

86

6/3/A/2

00

04

95

6/3/A/1

00

04

86

5/1/2/5/6/A/1

00

05

16

5/1/2/5/6/ A/2

00

14

29

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3783

4/2/1/ A

00

08

51

4/4

00

09

94

3/1/2/C

00

22

86

32

00

24

08

31/1P

00

11

64

38/A/1

00

09

30

38/A/2

00

09

07

49/1/1

00

11

59

50A/1

00

09

22

51/5

00

12

92

51/2

00

14

36

52/1/ A/1/D

00

06

88

52/1/A/1/A

00

05

51

52/6/A

00

03

49

52/9

00

03

49

52/8

00

07

46

53/1/A/1

00

13

33

53/1/A/3

00

12

47

58/1/C

00

13

57

58/1/B

00

12

42

59/1

00

05

87

59/2

00

07

33

59/1/3

00

06

38

59/4

00

06

87

60/3/A/2

00

03

14

60/2/1

00

17

85

60/2/2

00

12

78

61/1/1/C

00

14

61

61/1/1/B

00

07

70

61/1/1/T

00

03

74

61/1/1/D

00

04

60

3784

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

63/1/C/2/A

00

11

53

63/1/C/2/B

00

07

01

63/2

00

15

99

63/3

00

24

25

63/1/B/2

00

00

78

[F. No. R-11025(11)/6/2018-OR-I/E-23678]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

नई दली, 4 मई, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 802

802

802

802. —dsUnzh; ljdkj us isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbZu ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½

vf/kfu;e] 1962 ¼1962 dk 50½ ¼ftls blesa blds i'pkr~ mä vf/kfu;e dgk x;k gSa½ dh /kkjk 3 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ ds

v/khu tkjh dh xbZ Hkkjr ljdkj ds isVªksfy;e vkSj izkÑfrd xSl ea=ky; dh vf/klwpuk la[;k dk-vk- 2227 rkjh[k 18

flrEcj] 2017 tks Hkkjr ds jkti=] rkjh[k 17 flrEcj&23 flrEcj 2017] esa izdkf’kr dh xbZ Fkh }kjk ml vf/klwpuk ls

layXu vuqlwph esa fofufnZ"V Hkwfe esa egkjk"Vª jkT; esa ftyk vkSjaxkckn esa rkYkqdk oStkiqj dks;yh & vgenuxj & lksykiqj

isVªksfy;e ifjogu ds fy, bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs’ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbiykbZu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj

ds vtZu ds vius vk’k; dh ?kks"k.kk dh Fkh (

vkSj mä jkti= vf/kfu;e dh izfr;ka turk dks rkjh[k 30 fnlacj] 2017 rd miyC/k djk nh xbZ Fkh (

vkSj l{ke izkf/kdkjh us mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ ds v/khu dsUæh; ljdkj dks fjiksVZ dh gS (

vkSj dsUæh; ljdkj us] mä fjiksVZ ij fopkj djus ds i'pkr~ vkSj ;g lek/kku gks tkus ij fd mä Hkwfe

ikbiykbZu fcNkus ds fy, visf{kr gS] mlesa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu djus dk fofu’p; fd;k gS (

vr% vc] dsUæh; ljdkj mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk izn~Ùk 'kfä;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, ;g

?kks"k.kk djrh gS fd bl vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa fofufnZ"V Hkwfe esa ikbiykbZu fcNkus ds fy, mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj

dk vtZu fd;k tk, (

vkSj ljdkj mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi&/kkjk ¼4½ }kjk izn~Ùk 'kfä;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] ;g funsZ’k nsrh gS

fd mä Hkwfe esa mi;ksx dk vf/kdkj bl ?kks"k.kk ds izdk’ku dh rkjh[k ls dsUæh; ljdkj esa fufgr gksus ds ctk,] lHkh

foYyaxeksa ls eqä gksdj bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs’ku fyfeVsM esa fufgr gksxh A

isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbZu vf/kfu;e] 1962 dh /kkjk 10 ds v/khu fdlh Hkh {kfriwfrZ ds fy, bafM;u vkW;y

dkWiksZjs’ku fyfeVsM iw.kZr;k mÙkjnk;h gksxh vkSj ikbiykbZu ls lEcfU/kr fdlh Hkh ekeys ij dsUæh; ljdkj ds fo#) dksbZ

okn nkok ;k dkuwuh dk;Zokgh ugha gks ldsxhA

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

rglhy%&oStkiqj

ftyk%& vkSjaxkckn

jkT;%& egkjk"Vª

ekSts @xzke

losZ @ Cykd @ la-

¼IyksV la-½

lc&Mho&la-

{ks=Qy

gsDVj

vkj

oxZ ehVj

1

2

3

4

5

6

lqjkYkk

262

00

05

38

261

00

20

97

260

00

11

31

256

00

31

56

252

00

10

87

251

00

50

94

250

00

33

92

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3785

277

00

23

81

275

00

14

87

274

00

03

59

278

00

34

66

243

00

00

68

236

00

22

98

242

00

00

60

241

00

14

32

238

00

32

20

117

00

20

25

118

00

55

88

120

00

21

57

124

00

24

22

125

00

10

04

126

00

09

41

127

00

03

93

163

00

12

86

164

00

14

95

165

00

12

35

171

00

13

52

172

00

27

48

175

00

25

44

176

00

06

41

dhjRkIkqj

67

00

37

07

60

00

28

61

61

00

37

79

58

00

27

70

47

00

15

56

48

00

44

36

49

00

02

68

45

00

38

06

44

00

07

96

Hkmj

134

00

07

64

xk¢¸kxkaOk

18

00

27

41

17

00

26

90

15

00

13

53

43

00

00

20

44

00

12

58

50

00

20

50

3786

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

51

00

18

11

52

00

10

66

54

00

22

32

56

00

18

77

68

00

12

26

65

00

13

86

66

00

02

93

62

00

14

18

61

00

10

53

105

00

31

49

107

00

16

61

108

00

17

10

111

00

17

08

112

00

18

28

113

00

01

94

YkkMXkkao

307

00

06

02

308

00

14

00

305

00

28

96

304

00

09

35

294

00

92

44

292

00

52

70

283

00

56

07

226

00

17

62

227

00

37

71

228

00

13

11

234

00

11

96

235

00

07

94

237

00

10

44

194

00

12

99

193

00

14

08

182

00

12

70

181

00

12

79

180

00

27

82

179

00

25

15

178

00

18

72

177

00

14

25

174

00

36

53

173

00

08

79

172

00

10

68

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3787

171

00

16

33

170

00

17

96

169

00

07

24

167

00

07

70

lko[k¢M XkaXkk

179

00

76

16

180

00

24

51

181

00

24

52

182

00

12

54

183

00

14

17

184

00

29

80

186

00

19

14

187

00

16

43

188

00

48

08

189

00

18

20

190

00

18

22

191

00

15

94

193

00

31

09

192

00

02

55

195

00

00

31

194

00

50

83

146

00

29

04

147

00

18

03

145

00

53

11

144

00

11

84

136

00

57

30

135

00

63

50

116

00

40

88

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/6/2018-ओआर-I/ई-23678]

पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 4th May, 2018

S.O. 802.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural

Gas vide S.O. No. 2227 dated the 18th September, 2017, issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and

Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said

Act), Published in the Gazette of India dated the 17th September-23rd September, 2017, the Central Government

declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for

the purpose of laying Koyali-Ahmednagar-Solapur Pipeline for the transportation of Petroleum Products in Aurangabad

District in the State of Maharashtra by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public up to 30th December,

2017;

And whereas the competent authority has under sub-section (1) of Section 6 of said act submitted report to the

Central Government;

3788

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

And Whereas the Central Government, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said

land is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of user therein;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is

hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby directs that right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the

Central Government, vest on the date of publication of the declaration, in Indian Oil Corporation Limited, free from all

encumbrances.

Indian Oil Corporation Limited shall be exclusively liable for any compensation in terms of Section 10 of the

P & MP Act, 1962 and no suit, claim or legal proceeding would lie against the Central Government on any matter

relating to the pipeline.

SCHEDULE

Tehsil:- Vaijapur

District:- Aurangabad

State :- Maharashtra

Mouja / Village

Survey/Block No.

Sub-Div-No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

Surala

262

00

05

38

261

00

20

97

260

00

11

31

256

00

31

56

252

00

10

87

251

00

50

94

250

00

33

92

277

00

23

81

275

00

14

87

274

00

03

59

278

00

34

66

243

00

00

68

236

00

22

98

242

00

00

60

241

00

14

32

238

00

32

20

117

00

20

25

118

00

55

88

120

00

21

57

124

00

24

22

125

00

10

04

126

00

09

41

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3789

127

00

03

93

163

00

12

86

164

00

14

95

165

00

12

35

171

00

13

52

172

00

27

48

175

00

25

44

176

00

06

41

Keeratpur

67

00

37

07

60

00

28

61

61

00

37

79

58

00

27

70

47

00

15

56

48

00

44

36

49

00

02

68

45

00

38

06

44

00

07

96

Bhaur

134

00

07

64

Goygaon

18

00

27

41

17

00

26

90

15

00

13

53

43

00

00

20

44

00

12

58

50

00

20

50

51

00

18

11

52

00

10

66

54

00

22

32

56

00

18

77

68

00

12

26

65

00

13

86

66

00

02

93

62

00

14

18

61

00

10

53

105

00

31

49

107

00

16

61

3790

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

108

00

17

10

111

00

17

08

112

00

18

28

113

00

01

94

Ladgaon

307

00

06

02

308

00

14

00

305

00

28

96

304

00

09

35

294

00

92

44

292

00

52

70

283

00

56

07

226

00

17

62

227

00

37

71

228

00

13

11

234

00

11

96

235

00

07

94

237

00

10

44

194

00

12

99

193

00

14

08

182

00

12

70

181

00

12

79

180

00

27

82

179

00

25

15

178

00

18

72

177

00

14

25

174

00

36

53

173

00

08

79

172

00

10

68

171

00

16

33

170

00

17

96

169

00

07

24

167

00

07

70

Sawkheda Ganga

179

00

76

16

180

00

24

51

181

00

24

52

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3791

182

00

12

54

183

00

14

17

184

00

29

80

186

00

19

14

187

00

16

43

188

00

48

08

189

00

18

20

190

00

18

22

191

00

15

94

193

00

31

09

192

00

02

55

195

00

00

31

194

00

50

83

146

00

29

04

147

00

18

03

145

00

53

11

144

00

11

84

136

00

57

30

135

00

63

50

116

00

40

88

[F. No. R-11025(11)/6/2018-OR-I/E-23678]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

नई दली, 4 मई, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 803

803

803

803. —dsUnzh; ljdkj us isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbZu ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½

vf/kfu;e] 1962 ¼1962 dk 50½ ¼ftls blesa blds i'pkr~ mä vf/kfu;e dgk x;k gSa½ dh /kkjk 3 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ ds

v/khu tkjh dh xbZ Hkkjr ljdkj ds isVªksfy;e vkSj izkÑfrd xSl ea=ky; dh vf/klwpuk la[;k dk-vk- 2219 rkjh[k 14

flrEcj] 2017 tks Hkkjr ds jkti=] rkjh[k 17 flrEcj & 23 flrEcj 2017 esa izdkf’kr dh xbZ Fkh }kjk ml vf/klwpuk

ls layXu vuqlwph esa fofufnZ"V Hkwfe esa egkjk"Vª jkT; esa ftyk ukfld esa rkYkqdk ;soyk dks;yh & vgenuxj & lksykiqj

isVªksfy;e ifjogu ds fy, bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs’ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbiykbZu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj

ds vtZu ds vius vk’k; dh ?kks"k.kk dh Fkh (

vkSj mä jkti= vf/kfu;e dh izfr;ka turk dks rkjh[k 04 tuojh] 2018 rd miyC/k djk nh xbZ Fkh (

vkSj l{ke izkf/kdkjh us mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ ds v/khu dsUæh; ljdkj dks fjiksVZ dh gS (

vkSj dsUæh; ljdkj us] mä fjiksVZ ij fopkj djus ds i'pkr~ vkSj ;g lek/kku gks tkus ij fd mä Hkwfe

ikbiykbZu fcNkus ds fy, visf{kr gS] mlesa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu djus dk fofu’p; fd;k gS (

vr% vc] dsUæh; ljdkj mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk izn~Ùk 'kfä;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, ;g

?kks"k.kk djrh gS fd bl vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa fofufnZ"V Hkwfe esa ikbiykbZu fcNkus ds fy, mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj

dk vtZu fd;k tk, (

3792

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

vkSj ljdkj mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi&/kkjk ¼4½ }kjk izn~Ùk 'kfä;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] ;g funsZ’k nsrh gS

fd mä Hkwfe esa mi;ksx dk vf/kdkj bl ?kks"k.kk ds izdk’ku dh rkjh[k ls dsUæh; ljdkj esa fufgr gksus ds ctk,] lHkh

foYyaxeksa ls eqä gksdj bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs’ku fyfeVsM esa fufgr gksxh A

isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbZu vf/kfu;e] 1962 dh /kkjk 10 ds v/khu fdlh Hkh {kfriwfrZ ds fy, bafM;u vkW;y

dkWiksZjs’ku fyfeVsM iw.kZr;k mÙkjnk;h gksxh vkSj ikbiykbZu ls lEcfU/kr fdlh Hkh ekeys ij dsUæh; ljdkj ds fo#) dksbZ

okn nkok ;k dkuwuh dk;Zokgh ugha gks ldsxhA

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

rglhy%&;soyk

ftyk%& ukfld

jkT;%& egkjk"Vª

ekStk @xzke

losZ @ Cykd @ la-

¼IyksV la-½

lc&Mho&la-

{ks=Qy

gsDVs;j

vkjs

oxZ ehVj

1

2

3

4

5

6

olaruxj

21@1

00

23

71

21@2

00

17

07

18@1

00

01

72

22@1

00

00

20

25@1

00

00

48

25@2

00

36

27

24

00

06

56

26

00

35

32

27@1

00

00

25

27@2

00

26

93

27@3

00

27

07

14@2

00

58

36

13@1

00

56

50

13@2

00

36

00

31

00

55

26

32

00

10

60

33@1

00

31

14

33@2

00

16

59

33@3

00

13

09

33@4

00

16

14

1

00

79

52

4

00

74

03

dqlekM+h

433 iSdh

00

25

76

400

00

23

42

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3793

399

00

23

42

394

00

26

49

393

00

17

68

391

00

10

43

390@2

00

06

67

390@3

00

05

07

389

00

07

99

387

00

08

45

385

00

29

30

382

00

00

20

374

00

31

16

373

00

00

71

368

00

04

33

367

00

09

89

363

00

22

68

364

00

25

37

362

00

00

35

359

00

16

29

/kkeksM+s

72

00

25

00

77

00

03

45

78@1

00

12

55

79@1

00

06

70

79@2@c

00

06

72

82@2

00

05

82

84

00

08

41

87

00

09

31

89@1@v

00

08

21

89@1@c

00

08

80

90@2

00

30

78

91@1

00

20

86

91@2

00

30

07

94@1

00

23

37

3794

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

94@2@2@c

00

06

33

94@2@3@d

00

06

00

94@2@4@M

00

05

22

94@2@5@b

00

05

22

112

00

05

45

145

00

01

69

144

00

05

48

131

00

12

29

130

00

11

75

227@1@v

00

11

27

230

00

14

24

229

00

09

33

228

00

29

36

237

00

13

32

236

00

15

28

333

00

30

29

255@1

00

17

51

255@2

00

03

89

268

00

14

57

269

00

00

20

329

00

32

31

328@1

00

13

37

328@2

00

15

98

328@3

00

22

19

319@2

00

06

64

279

00

01

37

280

00

15

71

281

00

11

09

282

00

07

13

288

00

33

28

289

00

13

64

316@1@v

00

15

99

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3795

316@2@c

00

12

82

316@2

00

15

75

293

00

04

70

315@1

00

00

20

294

00

15

64

295

00

12

33

296

00

07

35

297

00

06

96

298

00

07

39

300@1

00

04

34

299

00

41

93

x.ks'kiqj

48

00

15

49

49

00

01

68

uxjlqy

1046@1

00

09

98

1045

00

30

85

1043

00

23

02

1042

00

10

93

1041

00

05

58

1040

00

06

51

1039

00

04

16

1038

00

12

49

ekrqyBk.k

243@2

00

10

03

243@3

00

01

88

243@5

00

09

40

243@6

00

27

02

247@1

00

10

49

247@2

00

19

05

250@1

00

03

55

250@2

00

12

19

251@v

00

08

45

251@c

00

03

54

253

00

02

77

3796

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

240

00

26

07

239

00

11

75

237

00

13

63

236@1

00

02

58

256@v

00

22

45

228

00

53

24

227@2@2

00

04

64

212

00

01

40

210@1

00

06

03

210@2

00

21

30

211

00

12

02

214

00

02

07

213

00

09

49

214iSdh

00

11

15

221

00

22

75

173

00

09

42

160

00

00

91

162@1

00

17

02

161

00

12

01

159@v

00

04

09

159@M

00

39

99

159@,Q

00

10

27

159@ts

00

04

84

158@1

00

11

85

153

00

08

45

152@2

00

13

69

152@3

00

15

96

cYgsxkao

17@1

00

03

14

18

00

46

88

20@1c

00

02

02

20@1d@1

00

25

77

20@1d@2

00

11

11

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3797

20@2c

00

12

53

51@1c

00

00

54

50@1@1v

00

08

16

50@1@1c

00

09

19

50@1@3@2

00

09

61

50@1@2

00

10

12

48@1

00

18

59

48@3

00

14

80

46@3v

00

12

91

47@1v

00

13

18

47@1c

00

15

72

47@2

00

06

72

43@1v

00

21

98

43@1c

00

02

49

43@2c

00

22

28

55@2@1

00

01

72

42@1

00

00

44

56@@1@2@A

00

31

40

56@1@2@c@2

00

19

81

56@1@2@c@1

00

07

18

58@1@3

00

14

56

58@1@4

00

15

14

58@2

00

03

44

59

00

31

43

60@1c

00

27

46

60@2@v

00

01

73

61@3c

00

04

10

/kke.kxkao

117

00

02

58

116

00

12

09

114

00

00

20

115@1

00

14

96

115@2

00

15

67

3798

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

99

00

33

03

98

00

19

90

100@1

00

04

03

94@v@2

00

40

47

94@v@1

00

19

74

94@c

00

05

75

93

00

00

20

86@1

00

11

26

87

00

17

01

88@1@1

00

10

11

88@1@2

00

04

11

69@1

00

14

61

69@1@1

00

00

05

68@v

00

14

44

68@v@1

00

15

19

68@c@1

00

17

53

vanjlqy

861@1

00

00

28

862@1

00

11

58

862@2

00

14

44

862@3@2

00

17

72

863@1

00

00

35

863@2

00

16

45

863@3

00

12

86

863@4

00

10

05

864@2

00

28

68

870

00

09

17

869@1@1

00

00

77

869@1@2

00

02

33

867@1

00

30

45

867@2

00

21

00

866

00

02

97

824@1

00

42

82

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3799

823@1@1

00

02

34

823@1@2

00

11

36

823@1@3

00

16

18

823@2

00

09

32

822@2c@2@1

00

09

51

822@2c@2@2

00

05

53

822@1v@2$822@1c@2

00

15

46

749@1

00

06

02

749@2

00

20

97

754

00

19

87

753@1

00

12

92

753@2

00

18

93

753@3

00

03

56

752

00

34

37

743@2

00

13

66

756@1

00

05

37

757@1

00

02

70

720@1

00

17

19

720@2

00

28

26

721@2

00

01

57

724@2

00

28

06

724@5

00

10

50

723@1

00

21

43

723@3

00

23

16

723@5

00

03

66

624@1@v

00

21

35

624@3

00

13

96

624@4@1

00

12

85

623@1

00

31

66

623@2

00

31

94

589@5

00

02

25

589@6

00

32

59

3800

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

588@1v@2@1

00

09

41

588@1v@2@2

00

10

86

588@1c@1

00

28

47

587@2

00

22

94

582@2

00

03

71

583@1

00

12

30

583@2

00

12

30

586@8

00

31

81

585@1@1

00

26

35

585@1@2

00

13

20

585@1@3

00

05

82

480@2

00

25

27

481@1

00

15

82

482@1@1

00

15

48

482@1@2

00

14

86

482@2

00

12

40

529

00

49

25

528

00

07

11

526@2

00

01

67

527@1

00

22

74

527@4

00

27

35

524

00

13

04

523

00

07

91

522

00

06

76

521

00

33

56

520

00

09

52

519

00

00

64

517@1

00

10

38

518

00

00

20

cksdVs

200@2

00

20

24

198@1@c

00

20

16

197@4¼197@4@5@6½

00

20

38

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3801

197@5¼197@4@5@6½

00

21

11

196@5

00

20

60

196@6

00

06

21

177@3

00

35

93

177@5

00

05

37

129@1] 2] 3] 4

00

40

62

128@3

00

12

30

128@4

00

14

70

132@1

00

21

39

132@2

00

19

15

132@3

00

20

86

133@1@c

00

09

87

133@1@v@2

00

04

68

133@2

00

04

89

134

00

10

64

134@2

00

05

65

135

00

08

46

136

00

09

14

137

00

09

48

71@1

00

02

74

70

00

33

23

69

00

18

55

69@2

00

04

94

67

00

17

26

66

00

08

86

66@2

00

08

65

64

00

35

31

nqxyxkoa

143

00

05

35

142

00

00

49

141

00

13

59

148

00

09

41

138@1

00

11

71

3802

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/6/2018-ओआर-I/ई-23678]

पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 4th May, 2018

S.O. 803.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural

Gas vide S.O. No. 2219 dated the 14th September, 2017, issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and

Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said

Act), Published in the Gazette of India dated the 17th September-23rd September 2017, the Central Government

declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for

the purpose of laying Koyali-Ahmednagar-Solapur Pipeline for the transportation of Petroleum Products in Taluka

Yeola in Nashik District in the State of Maharashtra by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public up to 4th January 2018;

And whereas the competent authority has under sub-section (1) of Section 6 of said act submitted report to the

Central Government;

And Whereas the Central Government, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said

land is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of user therein;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is

hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby directs that right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the

Central Government, vest on the date of publication of the declaration, in Indian Oil Corporation Limited, free from all

encumbrances.

Indian Oil Corporation Limited shall be exclusively liable for any compensation in terms of Section 10 of the

P & MP Act, 1962 and no suit, claim or legal proceeding would lie against the Central Government on any matter

relating to the pipeline.

SCHEDULE

137

00

07

38

151

00

35

11

152

00

15

73

35

00

12

03

36

00

03

28

34@1

00

28

58

32

00

44

11

33@c

00

00

20

31@1] 2

00

09

17

Tehsil:- Yeola

District:- Nashik

State :- Maharashtra

Mouja / Village

Survey/Block No.

Sub-Div-No.

Area

Hectare

are

Sq. Mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

Vasantnagar

21/1

00

23

71

21/2

00

17

07

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3803

18/1

00

01

72

22/1

00

00

20

25/1

00

00

48

25/2

00

36

27

24

00

06

56

26

00

35

32

27/1

00

00

25

27/2

00

26

93

27/3

00

27

07

14/2

00

58

36

13/1

00

56

50

13/2

00

36

00

31

00

55

26

32

00

10

60

33/1

00

31

14

33/2

00

16

59

33/3

00

13

09

33/4

00

16

14

1

00

79

52

4

00

74

03

Kusmadi

433 Paiky

00

25

76

400

00

23

42

399

00

23

42

394

00

26

49

393

00

17

68

391

00

10

43

390/2

00

06

67

390/3

00

05

07

389

00

07

99

387

00

08

45

385

00

29

30

382

00

00

20

374

00

31

16

373

00

00

71

368

00

04

33

367

00

09

89

363

00

22

68

3804

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

364

00

25

37

362

00

00

35

359

00

16

29

Dhamode

72

00

25

00

77

00

03

45

78/1

00

12

55

79/1

00

06

70

79/2/B

00

06

72

82/2

00

05

82

84

00

08

41

87

00

09

31

89/1/A

00

08

21

89/1/B

00

08

80

90/2

00

30

78

91/1

00

20

86

91/2

00

30

07

94/1

00

23

37

94/2/2/B

00

06

33

94/2/3/K

00

06

00

94/2/4/D

00

05

22

94/2/5/E

00

05

22

112

00

05

45

145

00

01

69

144

00

05

48

131

00

12

29

130

00

11

75

227/1/A

00

11

27

230

00

14

24

229

00

09

33

228

00

29

36

237

00

13

32

236

00

15

28

333

00

30

29

255/1

00

17

51

255/2

00

03

89

268

00

14

57

269

00

00

20

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3805

329

00

32

31

328/1

00

13

37

328/2

00

15

98

328/3

00

22

19

319/2

00

06

64

279

00

01

37

280

00

15

71

281

00

11

09

282

00

07

13

288

00

33

28

289

00

13

64

316/1/A

00

15

99

316/2/B

00

12

82

316/2

00

15

75

293

00

04

70

315/1

00

00

20

294

00

15

64

295

00

12

33

296

00

07

35

297

00

06

96

298

00

07

39

300/1

00

04

34

299

00

41

93

Ganeshpur

48

00

15

49

49

00

01

68

Nagarsul

1046/1

00

09

98

1045

00

30

85

1043

00

23

02

1042

00

10

93

1041

00

05

58

1040

00

06

51

1039

00

04

16

1038

00

12

49

Matulthan

243/2

00

10

03

243/3

00

01

88

243/5

00

09

40

243/6

00

27

02

3806

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

247/1

00

10

49

247/2

00

19

05

250/1

00

03

55

250/2

00

12

19

251/A

00

08

45

251/B

00

03

54

253

00

02

77

240

00

26

07

239

00

11

75

237

00

13

63

236/1

00

02

58

256/A

00

22

45

228

00

53

24

227/2/2

00

04

64

212

00

01

40

210/1

00

06

03

210/2

00

21

30

211

00

12

02

214

00

02

07

213

00

09

49

214P

00

11

15

221

00

22

75

173

00

09

42

160

00

00

91

162/1

00

17

02

161

00

12

01

159/A

00

04

09

159/D

00

39

99

159/F

00

10

27

159/J

00

04

84

158/1

00

11

85

153

00

08

45

152/2

00

13

69

152/3

00

15

96

Balhegaon

17/1

00

03

14

18

00

46

88

20/1B

00

02

02

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3807

20/1C/1

00

25

77

20/1C/2

00

11

11

20/2B

00

12

53

51/1B

00

00

54

50/1/1A

00

08

16

50/1/1B

00

09

19

50/1/3/2

00

09

61

50/1/2

00

10

12

48/1

00

18

59

48/3

00

14

80

46/3A

00

12

91

47/1A

00

13

18

47/1B

00

15

72

47/2

00

06

72

43/1A

00

21

98

43/1B

00

02

49

43/2B

00

22

28

55/2/1

00

01

72

42/1

00

00

44

56//1/2/A

00

31

40

56/1/2/B/2

00

19

81

56/1/2/B/1

00

07

18

58/1/3

00

14

56

58/1/4

00

15

14

58/2

00

03

44

59

00

31

43

60/1B

00

27

46

60/2/A

00

01

73

61/3B

00

04

10

Dhamangaon

117

00

02

58

116

00

12

09

114

00

00

20

115/1

00

14

96

115/2

00

15

67

99

00

33

03

98

00

19

90

100/1

00

04

03

3808

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

94/A/2

00

40

47

94/A/1

00

19

74

94/B

00

05

75

93

00

00

20

86/1

00

11

26

87

00

17

01

88/1/1

00

10

11

88/1/2

00

04

11

69/1

00

14

61

69/1/1

00

00

05

68/A

00

14

44

68/A/1

00

15

19

68/B/1

00

17

53

Andarsul

861/1

00

00

28

862/1

00

11

58

862/2

00

14

44

862/3/2

00

17

72

863/1

00

00

35

863/2

00

16

45

863/3

00

12

86

863/4

00

10

05

864/2

00

28

68

870

00

09

17

869/1/1

00

00

77

869/1/2

00

02

33

867/1

00

30

45

867/2

00

21

00

866

00

02

97

824/1

00

42

82

823/1/1

00

02

34

823/1/2

00

11

36

823/1/3

00

16

18

823/2

00

09

32

822/2B/2/1

00

09

51

822/2B/2/2

00

05

53

822/1B/2+822/1B/2

00

15

46

749/1

00

06

02

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3809

749/2

00

20

97

754

00

19

87

753/1

00

12

92

753/2

00

18

93

753/3

00

03

56

752

00

34

37

743/2

00

13

66

756/1

00

05

37

757/1

00

02

70

720/1

00

17

19

720/2

00

28

26

721/2

00

01

57

724/2

00

28

06

724/5

00

10

50

723/1

00

21

43

723/3

00

23

16

723/5

00

03

66

624/1/A

00

21

35

624/3

00

13

96

624/4/1

00

12

85

623/1

00

31

66

623/2

00

31

94

589/5

00

02

25

589/6

00

32

59

588/1A/2/1

00

09

41

588/1A/2/2

00

10

86

588/1B/1

00

28

47

587/2

00

22

94

582/2

00

03

71

583/1

00

12

30

583/2

00

12

30

586/8

00

31

81

585/1/1

00

26

35

585/1/2

00

13

20

585/1/3

00

05

82

480/2

00

25

27

481/1

00

15

82

3810

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

482/1/1

00

15

48

482/1/2

00

14

86

482/2

00

12

40

529

00

49

25

528

00

07

11

526/2

00

01

67

527/1

00

22

74

527/4

00

27

35

524

00

13

04

523

00

07

91

522

00

06

76

521

00

33

56

520

00

09

52

519

00

00

64

517/1

00

10

38

518

00

00

20

Bokate

200/2

00

20

24

198/1/B

00

20

16

197/4(197/4/5/6)

00

20

38

197/5(197/4/5/6)

00

21

11

196/5

00

20

60

196/6

00

06

21

177/3

00

35

93

177/5

00

05

37

129/1, 2, 3, 4

00

40

62

128/3

00

12

30

128/4

00

14

70

132/1

00

21

39

132/2

00

19

15

132/3

00

20

86

133/1/B

00

09

87

133/1/A/2

00

04

68

133/2

00

04

89

134

00

10

64

134/2

00

05

65

135

00

08

46

136

00

09

14

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3811

[F. No. R-11025(11)/6/2018-OR-I/E-23678]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

नई दली, 15 मई, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 804

804

804

804.—क8 ीय सरकार को ऐसा तीत होता है क लोक िहत म8 यह आवTयक है क तेलंगाना राय म8 पेSोिलयम

उपाद के प*रवहन के िलए पारादीप - हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन प*रयोजना के qया वयन हेतु इंिडयन ऑयल कॉप@रेशन िलिमटेड ारा

पाइपलाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए;

और क8 ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन िबछाने के योजन के िलए यह आवTयक तीत होता है क ऐसी भूिम म8 जो इस से

उपाबV अनुसूची म8 वXणत है, और िजसम8 उw पाइपलाइन िबछाई जाने का Uताव है, उपयोग के अिधकार का अज-न कया जाए;

अतः अब, के ीय सरकार, पेSोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइ स (भूिम म8 उपयोग के अिधकार का अज-न) अिधिनयम 1962

(1962 का 50) क धारा 3 क उपधारा (1) ारा द„ शिwय का योग करते ए उस भूिम म8 उपयोग के अिधकार का अज-न करने के

अपने आशय क घोषणा करती है;

कोई भी …िw, जो उw अनुसूची म8 वXणत भूिम म8 िहतबV है, उस तारीख से, िजसको इस अिधसूचना म8 युw भारत के

राजप7 क ितयाँ साधारण जनता को उपलlध करा दी जाती हW, इ‡स (21) दन के भीतर, भूिम के नीचे पाइपलाइन िबछाए जाने के

137

00

09

48

71/1

00

02

74

70

00

33

23

69

00

18

55

69/2

00

04

94

67

00

17

26

66

00

08

86

66/2

00

08

65

64

00

35

31

Dugalgaon

143

00

05

35

142

00

00

49

141

00

13

59

148

00

09

41

138/1

00

11

71

137

00

07

38

151

00

35

11

152

00

15

73

35

00

12

03

36

00

03

28

34/1

00

28

58

32

00

44

11

33/B

00

00

20

31/1, 2

00

09

17

3812

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

िलए उसम8 उपयोग के अिधकार के संब ध म8 0ी एम. नारायणा राव, सdम ािधकारी (तेलंगाना), इंिडयन ऑयल कॉप@रेशन िलिमटेड

(पाइपलाइन भाग), पारादीप-हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन प*रयोजना, ]लॉट संˆया 264/ए, दूसरी मंिजल, कैनरा बWक के ऊपर, माग- संˆया

10, जुिबली िहस, हैदराबाद-500033, तेलंगाना राय को िलिखत Fप से आdेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

िजला: यादा ी भुवनिग*र

राय: तेलंगाना

मंडल का नाम

nाम का नाम

सवx नrबर

dे7फल

हेटेयर

एयर

वग- मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

बी. पोचमपली

िजlलक पिल

167/1

00

10

85

168

00

25

72

169

00

29

08

176

00

20

77

226

00

54

59

रामŠपेट

एलि क

153

00

04

66

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/3/2018-ओआर-I/ई-21839]

पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018

S.O. 804.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government, that it is necessary in the public interest that for

the transportation of petroleum products in the State of Telangana a pipeline should be laid for implementing Paradip-

Hyderabad Pipeline Project under Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is

necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which is

described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and

Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby

declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person who is interested in the land described in the said schedule, may submit objection in writing to

Shri. M. Narayana Rao, Competent Authority (Telangana), Indian Oil Corporation Limited (Pipelines Division),

Paradip Hyderabad Pipeline Project, Plot No. 264/A, 2nd Floor, above Canara Bank, Road No. 10, Jubilee Hills,

Hyderabad - 500 033 within twenty one (21) days from the date on which the copies of this notification issued under

Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the general

public.

SCHEDULE

District : Yadadri Bhongir

State : Telangana

Name of Mandal

Name of Village

Survey No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Square Metre

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

B. Pochampally

Jiblak Palle

167/1

00

10

85

168

00

25

72

169

00

29

08

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3813

176

00

20

77

226

00

54

59

Ramannapet

Yellanki

153

00

04

66

[F. No. R-11025(11)/3/2018-OR-I/E-21839]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

नई दली, 15 मई, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 805

805

805

805.—क8 ीय सरकार को ऐसा तीत होता है क लोक िहत म8 यह आवTयक है क तेलंगाना राय म8 पेSोिलयम

उपाद के प*रवहन के िलए पारादीप - हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन प*रयोजना के qया वयन हेतु इंिडयन ऑयल कॉप@रेशन िलिमटेड ारा

पाइपलाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए;

और क8 ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन िबछाने के योजन के िलए यह आवTयक तीत होता है क ऐसी भूिम म8 जो इस

से उपाबV अनुसूची म8 वXणत है, और िजसम8 उw पाइपलाइन िबछाई जाने का Uताव है, उपयोग के अिधकार का अज-न कया जाए;

अतः अब, के ीय सरकार, पेSोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइ स (भूिम म8 उपयोग के अिधकार का अज-न) अिधिनयम 1962

(1962 का 50) क धारा 3 क उपधारा (1) ारा द„ शिwय का योग करते ए उस भूिम म8 उपयोग के अिधकार का अज-न करने के

अपने आशय क घोषणा करती है;

कोई भी …िw, जो उw अनुसूची म8 वXणत भूिम म8 िहतबV है, उस तारीख से, िजसको इस अिधसूचना म8 युw भारत के

राजप7 क ितयाँ साधारण जनता को उपलlध करा दी जाती हW, इ‡स (21) दन के भीतर, भूिम के नीचे पाइपलाइन िबछाए जाने के

िलए उसम8 उपयोग के अिधकार के संब ध म8 0ी एम. नारायणा राव, सdम ािधकारी (तेलंगाना), इंिडयन ऑयल कॉप@रेशन िलिमटेड

(पाइपलाइन भाग), पारादीप-हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन प*रयोजना, ]लॉट संˆया 264/ए, दूसरी मंिजल, कैनरा बWक के ऊपर, माग- संˆया

10, जुिबली िहस, हैदराबाद-500033, तेलंगाना राय को िलिखत Fप से आdेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

िजला: नलगडा राय: तेलंगाना

मंडल का नाम

nाम का नाम

सवx नrबर

dे7फल

हेटेयर

एयर

वग- मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

केतेपली

भीमारम

53

00

18

16

केतेपली

तुंगतुXत

147/27

00

14

57

147/4

00

04

38

12

00

59

60

19

00

34

32

20

00

50

21

केतेपली

चेAकुपली

682

00

19

16

683

00

47

18

472

00

18

14

3814

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

473

00

06

55

474

00

13

69

488

00

05

54

489

00

02

69

487

00

08

99

486

00

15

91

485

00

16

02

484

00

19

82

419

00

17

46

नकरेकल

मF- र

299

00

00

04

300

00

01

11

नाकxटपली

नेrमिन

136

00

32

81

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/3/2018-ओआर-I/ई-21839]

पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018

S.O. 805.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government, that it is necessary in the public interest that for the

transportation of petroleum products in the State of Telangana a pipeline should be laid for implementing Paradip-

Hyderabad Pipeline Project under Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is

necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which is

described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub Section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and

Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby

declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person who is interested in the land described in the said schedule, may submit objection in writing to Shri.

M. Narayana Rao, Competent Authority (Telangana), Indian Oil Corporation Limited (Pipelines Division), Paradip

Hyderabad Pipeline Project, Plot No. 264/A, 2nd Floor, above Canara Bank, Road No. 10, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad -

500 033 within twenty one (21) days from the date on which the copies of this notification issued under Sub-section (1)

of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the general public.

SCHEDULE

District : Nalgonda

State : Telangana

Name of Mandal

Name of Village

Survey No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Square Metre

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

Kethepally

Bheemaram

53

00

18

16

Kethepally

Thungathurthy

147/27

00

14

57

147/4

00

04

38

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3815

12

00

59

60

19

00

34

32

20

00

50

21

Kethepally

Cherkupally

682

00

19

16

683

00

47

18

472

00

18

14

473

00

06

55

474

00

13

69

488

00

05

54

489

00

02

69

487

00

08

99

486

00

15

91

485

00

16

02

484

00

19

82

419

00

17

46

Nakrekal

Marrur

299

00

00

04

300

00

01

11

Narketpally

Nemmani

136

00

32

81

[F. No. R-11025(11)/3/2018-OR-I/E-21839]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

नई दली, 15 मई, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 806

806

806

806.—क8 ीय सरकार को ऐसा तीत होता है क लोक िहत म8 यह आवTयक है क तेलंगाना राय म8 पेSोिलयम

उपाद के प*रवहन के िलए पारादीप - हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन प*रयोजना के qया वयन हेतु इंिडयन ऑयल कॉप@रेशन िलिमटेड ारा

पाइपलाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए;

और क8 ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन िबछाने के योजन के िलए यह आवTयक तीत होता है क ऐसी भूिम म8 जो इस

से ऊपाबV अनुसूची म8 वXणत है, और िजसम8 उw पाइपलाइन िबछाई जाने का Uताव है, उपयोग के अिधकार का अज-न कया जाए;

अतः अब, के ीय सरकार, पेSोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइ स (भूिम म8 उपयोग के अिधकार का अज-न) अिधिनयम 1962

(1962 का 50) क धारा 3 क उपधारा (1) ारा द„ शिwय का योग करते ए उस भूिम म8 उपयोग के अिधकार का अज-न करने के

अपने आशय क घोषणा करती है;

कोई भी …िw, जो उw अनुसूची म8 वXणत भूिम म8 िहतबV है, उस तारीख से, िजसको इस अिधसूचना म8 युw भारत के

राजप7 क ितयाँ साधारण जनता को उपलlध करा दी जाती हW, इ‡स (21) दन के भीतर, भूिम के नीचे पाइपलाइन िबछाए जाने के

िलए उसम8 उपयोग के अिधकार के संब ध म8 0ी एम. नारायणा राव, सdम ािधकारी (तेलंगाना), इंिडयन ऑयल कॉप@रेशन िलिमटेड

(पाइपलाइन भाग), पारादीप-हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन प*रयोजना, ]लॉट संˆया 264/ए, दूसरी मंिजल, कैनरा बWक के ऊपर, माग- संˆया

10, जुिबली िहस, हैदराबाद-500033, तेलंगाना राय को िलिखत Fप से आdेप भेज सकेगा|

3816

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

िजला : खrमम

राय : तेलंगाना

मंडल का नाम

nाम का नाम

सवx नrबर

dे7फल

हेटेयर

एयर

वग- मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

मिधरा

िचलकुA

41

00

46

64

मिधरा

रायापनम

342

00

37

52

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/3/2018-ओआर-I/ई-21839]

पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018

S.O. 806.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government, that it is necessary in the public interest that for

the transportation of petroleum products in the State of Telangana a pipeline should be laid for implementing Paradip-

Hyderabad Pipeline Project under Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is

necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which is

described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub Section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and

Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby

declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person who is interested in the land described in the said schedule, may submit objection in writing to

Shri. M. Narayana Rao, Competent Authority (Telangana), Indian Oil Corporation Limited (Pipelines Division),

Paradip Hyderabad Pipeline Project, Plot No. 264/A, 2nd Floor, above Canara Bank, Road No. 10, Jubilee Hills,

Hyderabad - 500 033 within twenty one (21) days from the date on which the copies of this notification issued under

Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the general

public.

SCHEDULE

District : Khammam

State : Telangana

Name of Mandal

Name of Village

Survey No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Square Metre

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

Madhira

Chilkuru

41

00

46

64

Madhira

Rayapatnam

342

00

37

52

[F. No. R-11025(11)/3/2018-OR-I/E-21839]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

नई दली, 15 मई, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 807

807

807

807.—क8 ीय सरकार को ऐसा तीत होता है क लोक िहत म8 यह आवTयक है क तेलंगाना राय म8 पेSोिलयम

उपाद के प*रवहन के िलए पारादीप - हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन प*रयोजना के qया वयन हेतु इंिडयन ऑयल कॉप@रेशन िलिमटेड ारा

पाइपलाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए;

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3817

और क8 ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन िबछाने के योजन के िलए यह आवTयक तीत होता है क ऐसी भूिम म8 जो इस से

उपाबV अनुसूची म8 वXणत है, और िजसम8 उw पाइपलाइन िबछाई जाने का Uताव है, उपयोग के अिधकार का अज-न कया जाए;

अतः अब, के ीय सरकार, पेSोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइ स (भूिम म8 उपयोग के अिधकार का अज-न) अिधिनयम 1962

(1962 का 50) क धारा 3 क उपधारा (1) ारा द„ शिwय का योग करते ए उस भूिम म8 उपयोग के अिधकार का अज-न करने के

अपने आशय क घोषणा करती है;

कोई भी …िw, जो उw अनुसूची म8 वXणत भूिम म8 िहतबV है, उस तारीख से, िजसको इस अिधसूचना म8 युw भारत के

राजप7 क ितयाँ साधारण जनता को उपलlध करा दी जाती हW, इ‡स (21) दन के भीतर, भूिम के नीचे पाइपलाइन िबछाए जाने के

िलए उसम8 उपयोग के अिधकार के संब ध म8 0ी एम. नारायणा राव, सdम ािधकारी (तेलंगाना), इंिडयन ऑयल कॉप@रेशन िलिमटेड

(पाइपलाइन भाग), पारादीप-हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन प*रयोजना, ]लॉट संˆया 264/ए, दूसरी मंिजल, कैनरा बWक के ऊपर, माग- संˆया

10, जुिबली िहस, हैदराबाद-500033, तेलंगाना राय को िलिखत Fप से आdेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

िजला: सुया-पेट

राय: तेलंगाना

मंडल का नाम

nाम का नाम

सवx नrबर

dे7फल

हेटेयर

एयर

वग- मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

िचलुकूA

िचलुकूA

201

00

00

53

127

00

01

55

377

00

07

97

मुनगाला

गणपवरम

169/5

00

00

17

पे पहाड़

पे पहाड़

94/26

00

04

09

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/3/2018-ओआर-I/ई-21839]

पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018

S.O. 807.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government, that it is necessary in the public interest that for

the transportation of petroleum products in the State of Telangana a pipeline should be laid for implementing Paradip-

Hyderabad Pipeline Project under Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is

necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which is

described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub Section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and

Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby

declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person who is interested in the land described in the said schedule, may submit objection in writing to

Shri. M. Narayana Rao, Competent Authority (Telangana), Indian Oil Corporation Limited (Pipelines Division),

Paradip Hyderabad Pipeline Project, Plot No. 264/A, 2nd Floor, above Canara Bank, Road No. 10, Jubilee Hills,

Hyderabad - 500 033 within twenty one (21) days from the date on which the copies of this notification issued under

Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the general

public.

3818

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

SCHEDULE

District : Suryapet

State : Telangana

Name of Mandal

Name of Village

Survey No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Square Metre

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

Chilkur

Chilkur

201

00

00

53

127

00

01

55

377

00

07

97

Munagala

Ganapavaram

169/5

00

00

17

Penpahad

Penpahad

94/26

00

04

09

[F. No. R-11025(11)/3/2018-OR-I/E-21839]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

नई दली, 15 मई, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 808

808

808

808.— के ीय सरकार, पेSोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूिम म8 उपयोग के अिधकार का अज-न) अिधिनयम

1962 (1962 का 50) (िजसे इसम8 इसके पŒात उw अिधिनयम कहा गया है) क धारा 3 क उप-धारा (1) भारत के राजप7,

(असाधारण) के अधीन जारी क गयी भारत सरकार के पेSोिलयम और ाकृितक गैस मं7ालय क अिधसूचना का. आ 563(अ), तारीख

15 फरवरी 2017, ारा तिमलनाडु राय म8 एŠोर - ितAवलूर - ब8गलुA - पांिडचेरी - नागप*नम - मदुरै - टू*टको*रन पाइपलाइन

िबछाई जानी चािहए के प*रवहन के िलए इंिडयन ऑयल काप@रेशन िलिमटेड के ारा पाइपलाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए;

और उw अिधसूचना क ितयाँ जनता को तारीख 01.03.2017 को उपलl ध करा दी गई थL।

और उw अिधिनयम क धारा 6 क उप - धारा (1) के अनुसरण म8 सdम ािधकारी ने के ीय सरकार को अपनी *रपोट- दे दी

है।

और के ीय सरकार का उw *रपोट- पर िवचार करने के पŒात यह समाधान हो गया है क इस अिधसूचना से संलŽ अनुसूची

म8 िविनuदy भूिम म8 उपयोग के अिधकार का अज-न कया जाना चािहए।

अत: अब, के ीय सरकार,उw अिधिनयम क धारा 6 क उप-धारा(1) ारा द„ शिwय का योग करते ए यह घोषणा

करती है क इस अिधसूचना के संलŽ अनुसूची म8 िविनuदy उw भूिम म8 पाइपलाइन िबछाने के िलए उपयोग का अिधकार अXजत कया

जाता है।

यह और क के ीय सरकार, उw अिधिनयम क धारा 6 क उप-धारा(4) ारा द„ शिwय का योग करते ए यह िनदxश

देती है क उw भूिम के उपयोग का अिधकार इस अिधसूचना के काश क तारीख से के ीय सरकार म8 िनिहत होने क बजाय, सभी

िवलंगम से मुw हो कर इंिडयन ऑयल कॉप@रेशन िलिमटेड म8 िनिहत होगा।

पैSोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन अिधिनयम, 1962 क धारा 10 के अधीन कसी भी dितपूXत के िलए इंिडयन ऑयल

कॉप@रेशन िलिमटेड पूण-तया उ„रदायी होगी और पाइपलाइन से सrबि धत कसी भी मामले पर के ीय सरकार के िवAV कोई वाद,

दावा या कानूनी काय-वाही नहL हो सकेगी।

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

िजला : रामनाथपुरम

राय : तिमलनाडु

तालुका का नाम

गाँव का नाम

सवxdण सं.

उप ख^ड सं.

dे7फल

हेटेयर

एयर

वग- मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

कडलाड़ी

40 करंदै

251

18

00

03

70

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3819

251

19

00

03

00

251

17

00

10

30

251

9बी

00

06

90

251

10

00

01

25

251

15ए1

00

04

90

251

15ए2

00

00

40

251

11

00

05

60

256

7ए

00

02

70

256

5

00

06

95

256

10ए

00

00

40

256

1

00

05

00

258

3डी

00

04

35

258

3बी

00

02

70

258

3ए

00

01

00

258

2

00

03

45

258

1

00

02

90

259

9बी

00

00

90

259

10

00

07

60

259

7

00

02

95

259

5

00

03

90

259

3ए

00

06

30

259

3बी

00

04

60

265

6

00

03

60

265

7

00

00

40

265

5बी

00

06

80

265

5ए

00

09

55

265

1

00

02

00

270

1

00

00

40

266

2

00

13

00

266

3ए

00

00

40

266

4

00

01

60

266

5

00

05

50

266

6ए

00

01

40

266

7

00

01

20

266

1बी

00

02

45

266

1ए

00

06

00

267

2सी3

00

04

40

267

2सी2

00

06

15

267

2सी1

00

05

05

267

2ए

00

00

65

3820

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

267

4

00

00

40

267

5

00

01

90

150

6ए

00

09

00

173

8ए

00

10

10

173

7ए

00

10

80

173

3सी

00

03

70

173

3डी

00

03

00

173

3ई

00

00

80

173

2बी

00

03

50

173

3जी

00

02

30

173

3एच

00

02

90

173

3आई

00

03

60

173

3जे

00

03

45

173

3के

00

02

90

173

3एल

00

03

40

172

5सी4

00

02

70

172

5बी

00

00

40

172

9

00

06

70

172

7

00

11

85

172

6ए

00

02

25

172

6बी

00

10

00

158

1

00

01

20

170

5बी

00

06

50

159

2बी

00

02

80

159

2ए

00

04

35

159

1सी

00

17

20

159

1बी

00

01

35

166

10ए1ए

00

06

40

166

10ए1बी

00

10

00

166

10ए1सी

00

00

90

166

7

00

08

30

166

8ए

00

09

70

104

1

00

00

60

104

2

00

13

65

104

3

00

01

25

78

7

00

10

45

103

3बी

00

12

25

103

3सी

00

03

10

103

2बी

00

06

80

105

1

00

01

45

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3821

102

1बी2

00

08

00

102

2

00

12

00

102

3

00

13

00

101

10

00

01

55

106

1डी

00

00

50

106

1सी

00

03

60

106

1बी

00

04

35

106

1ए

00

03

10

110

1ए

00

11

15

98

2बी

00

02

00

98

1ई

00

03

30

98

1एफ1

00

09

80

98

1एफ2

00

02

55

98

1एफ3

00

01

35

113

7बी

00

00

80

113

7ए

00

01

40

113

4

00

04

20

113

3सी

00

00

40

113

5

00

05

70

113

2

00

00

60

113

6

00

04

45

113

1सी2

00

07

35

113

1सी1

00

04

85

113

1बी

00

00

70

116

1

00

13

00

115

3

00

10

45

127

00

04

60

430

13

00

04

15

430

14

00

09

30

430

7

00

03

35

430

6

00

03

85

430

5

00

06

10

430

4

00

00

40

433

1

00

00

40

432

14

00

06

90

432

13

00

03

40

432

11

00

06

50

432

9

00

07

10

432

10

00

00

45

432

8

00

00

60

3822

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

432

6

00

00

40

436

00

04

50

425

1

00

26

10

19

7

00

11

70

2

8

00

06

95

2

9

00

00

40

2

10

00

13

15

2

7

00

25

90

कडलाड़ी

23 वोरीवयल

252

00

32

60

253

1

00

06

80

248

2

00

20

50

248

1

00

14

00

249

1

00

16

75

158

2

00

00

40

158

1

00

13

25

154

1सी

00

01

30

154

1बी

00

04

45

154

1ए

00

09

75

153

3

00

20

90

153

1

00

00

50

153

2

00

27

00

151

4

00

09

20

151

3

00

09

55

150

5

00

14

95

150

2

00

11

60

149

4

00

16

70

149

1

00

04

50

148

00

07

20

147

2

00

06

70

147

1

00

07

00

146

2

00

07

60

146

1

00

06

90

145

2

00

13

70

24

3

00

05

45

24

24

00

01

00

24

2सी4

00

03

70

24

23

00

00

40

24

2सी3

00

06

40

24

2सी2

00

06

75

24

2बी3

00

02

40

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3823

24

2बी2

00

04

15

24

2बी1

00

04

85

24

19

00

08

80

24

18

00

04

60

24

17

00

07

20

24

2ए2

00

05

20

24

2ए1

00

09

00

23

2

00

10

90

22

3ई

00

05

40

22

3एफ

00

03

20

21

2बी2

00

00

45

21

2बी1

00

02

25

21

2ए2

00

03

00

21

2ए3

00

04

20

21

2ए1

00

06

85

21

3ए

00

00

65

21

1ए

00

05

75

कडलाड़ी

22 मारंदै

380

00

07

55

382

3बी

00

03

70

382

4बी

00

12

85

382

4ए

00

19

50

382

5

00

00

40

383

1बी

00

08

65

383

1ए

00

08

65

384

2बी

00

09

25

384

2ए

00

02

50

384

3

00

18

35

384

4

00

07

95

385

3बी

00

11

15

385

2

00

00

40

385

4

00

02

50

385

5

00

13

05

385

6

00

00

65

386

6

00

08

45

386

5बी

00

00

40

386

5सी

00

06

50

386

5डी

00

00

60

386

4बी

00

06

15

387

3बी

00

15

50

387

3ए

00

02

00

3824

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

387

2बी

00

01

00

387

2ए

00

18

10

387

1

00

15

50

388

1ए

00

11

90

388

2ए

00

12

60

389

1

00

12

25

389

2

00

11

90

356

2

00

03

20

356

1

00

10

30

356

4ए

00

11

70

356

4सी

00

05

25

355

4

00

22

75

355

3डी

00

01

90

355

3ई

00

04

90

352

5

00

05

80

352

4बी

00

13

45

352

4ए

00

04

50

352

3

00

07

60

352

2बी

00

04

15

352

2ए

00

04

00

351

5

00

08

30

351

4सी

00

15

30

351

3एच

00

03

00

351

3आई

00

01

10

351

3जे

00

00

40

351

2ई

00

03

40

351

2डी

00

01

65

351

2सी

00

00

40

350

10

00

21

60

कडलाड़ी

21 पुनवासल

236

2ए

00

19

30

237

1

00

05

85

237

3बी

00

02

90

237

3ए

00

09

75

378

3

00

09

00

378

4ए

00

02

10

234

4बी1

00

00

60

234

4बी2

00

01

35

377

1डी

00

03

20

377

1ई

00

03

60

377

3ए3

00

09

50

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3825

375

1

00

02

55

374

1ए

00

07

30

374

3एफ

00

09

20

374

2ए

00

04

50

374

2बी

00

03

90

374

3आई

00

04

75

374

3जे

00

01

00

374

4सी

00

03

70

374

5ए

00

03

70

374

5बी

00

04

60

372

1

00

01

85

372

2

00

00

90

372

3

00

05

00

371

1ए

00

05

15

371

2ए

00

05

00

371

2बी2

00

02

30

371

3ए

00

06

55

371

3बी

00

06

15

370

1बी

00

07

20

370

2ए

00

03

10

370

2बी

00

01

45

368

1

00

07

40

368

3

00

08

85

367

1बी1

00

11

40

367

2

00

03

70

366

1

00

00

40

366

2

00

01

50

366

3

00

02

80

366

4

00

04

20

366

5ए

00

04

20

366

6ए

00

02

40

366

5सी

00

06

20

366

5डी

00

07

45

421

1ए

00

22

60

421

1डी1

00

03

65

421

1बी2

00

20

45

424

4

00

03

65

425

1

00

04

75

425

2

00

03

30

427

1

00

01

60

3826

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

427

2

00

01

60

427

3ए

00

02

15

427

3बी

00

03

90

427

4ए

00

03

70

427

4बी

00

03

90

426

1ए

00

02

35

428

1

00

06

30

428

2

00

06

30

428

3

00

09

15

428

5

00

12

55

430

2ए

00

02

85

431

2

00

04

20

433

1ए

00

01

60

433

1बी

00

02

40

433

1सी

00

02

75

433

2

00

04

80

433

3

00

00

75

433

4ए

00

02

75

433

4बी1

00

01

75

433

4बी2

00

01

75

438

1ए1

00

06

60

438

1बी1

00

01

60

438

1बी2

00

04

60

438

2बी

00

06

75

438

3ए

00

11

90

439

1ए

00

33

60

कडलाड़ी

18 के वे]पनकुलम

70

3

00

04

50

70

6

00

23

60

70

4

00

00

40

70

2

00

08

90

70

1

00

07

00

73

6ई

00

00

40

73

6एफ

00

01

50

73

6जी

00

03

80

73

1एच

00

00

40

74

3

00

00

80

74

2

00

04

00

74

4

00

25

00

77

3ए1

00

06

55

77

3ए2

00

09

10

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3827

77

2सी

00

00

40

77

2बी

00

02

00

77

2ए

00

11

20

131

4ए

00

06

35

134

2डी

00

00

40

134

2एफ

00

08

10

134

3

00

03

00

135

5

00

15

60

135

3ए

00

03

55

135

7बी

00

05

95

136

2ए

00

01

25

136

2बी

00

06

30

136

7सी

00

05

35

136

3बी

00

11

20

136

6

00

03

20

144

3

00

04

30

144

7ए

00

07

15

144

4बी

00

03

50

144

4ए

00

06

80

155

3बी

00

06

35

155

3सी

00

02

55

155

4ए

00

01

50

155

4बी

00

00

40

158

1ए4

00

04

30

158

2

00

01

30

158

3

00

06

35

158

6ए

00

03

70

158

7ए1

00

05

80

158

1ए6

00

02

00

158

6बी

00

03

00

158

4बी

00

02

10

158

1ए5

00

01

00

160

1बी

00

03

75

160

33

00

06

15

160

1डी

00

06

55

160

1ए

00

00

95

160

1सी

00

05

10

161

2ए2

00

08

00

164

1

00

03

60

164

2ए1

00

24

40

3828

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

164

4

00

00

65

165

3एच

00

07

00

179

3

00

04

00

179

2

00

05

85

179

4बी1

00

03

90

180

4ए1

00

04

60

180

4ए2

00

06

10

181

7बी

00

05

65

186

2

00

13

70

186

3

00

01

65

186

4

00

10

90

190

1

00

09

35

190

2

00

11

10

191

6ए2

00

04

30

191

7ए

00

00

40

191

5बी

00

01

50

191

6ए1

00

05

90

200

4

00

00

40

200

6

00

00

40

200

5

00

03

50

200

7ए

00

00

95

200

8

00

12

10

कडलाड़ी

19 आ]पनूर

319

1ए

00

16

20

319

1बी

00

10

35

319

2

00

05

20

339

1

00

08

60

340

1

00

01

65

340

2

00

24

45

340

4

00

09

00

344

3

00

22

00

344

2

00

06

40

351

3सी

00

09

90

351

1ए

00

11

00

350

2बी

00

20

00

350

2ए

00

00

40

350

3

00

27

75

358

1ए

00

08

70

348

5बी

00

04

00

348

5ए

00

04

00

348

4बी

00

06

75

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3829

348

4ए

00

07

00

348

3बी

00

00

65

359

3बी

00

05

25

359

3ए

00

05

30

कडलाड़ी

17 मरवर क*रसलकुलम

297

2

00

33

50

295

2बी

00

13

00

295

2ए

00

07

10

294

2

00

07

60

301

1

00

01

30

293

2

00

28

75

303

2

00

06

80

303

3बी

00

13

00

303

4

00

16

65

311

1बी

00

00

40

311

1ए

00

07

40

304

2

00

15

15

304

1बी2

00

06

00

304

1बी1

00

07

00

304

1ए4

00

00

40

308

1

00

11

55

308

2

00

11

15

284

3

00

05

10

283

1ए1

00

04

70

283

1ए2

00

04

35

283

1ए3

00

05

05

283

1ए4

00

04

00

283

1ए5

00

01

50

283

1ए6

00

00

40

282

2बी

00

04

85

282

1बी

00

09

55

282

1ए

00

03

00

277

1ए

00

00

90

281

2सी

00

00

65

280

3

00

11

00

280

2

00

09

75

280

1ए2

00

00

40

280

1ए3

00

08

10

280

1बी

00

03

60

176

2

00

10

80

3830

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

175

14बी

00

01

65

175

14ए

00

00

40

175

14सी

00

06

60

175

13

00

07

40

180

5बी

00

09

60

177

3बी

00

04

85

177

3ए

00

07

75

177

1ए

00

00

50

177

1बी

00

10

70

178

10ए

00

08

30

178

9बी

00

00

40

178

8

00

08

25

178

2

00

00

95

178

3

00

07

70

178

1

00

07

20

199

2

00

10

65

200

3

00

18

90

200

2

00

13

90

200

1बी

00

06

00

200

1ए2

00

06

85

201

3

00

09

30

201

2

00

09

35

201

1

00

13

15

138

1

00

06

85

139

2सी

00

00

40

139

3ए

00

11

65

139

3बी

00

25

55

132

3ए

00

01

75

132

1ए

00

02

80

131

16

00

02

40

131

14बी

00

03

40

131

14ए

00

03

80

131

13

00

07

20

131

12ए

00

03

40

131

12बी

00

05

50

131

1बी

00

01

50

131

1ए

00

00

40

131

2बी

00

09

35

131

2ए

00

01

00

131

3

00

00

75

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3831

140

2सी

00

04

70

126

2सी

00

03

10

126

2डी

00

01

05

126

2बी1

00

02

35

126

2ए

00

02

20

126

3बी

00

04

05

126

3ए

00

02

70

126

4ए

00

12

00

126

4बी1

00

00

60

126

1

00

00

40

125

1एच

00

33

50

124

4बी2

00

00

50

124

5सी

00

02

75

124

5बी

00

02

75

124

5ए

00

03

00

124

2बी

00

04

95

124

6ए

00

03

75

124

1

00

03

15

109

17ए

00

00

75

109

19

00

01

20

109

17बी1

00

05

80

109

9बी

00

02

25

109

9सी

00

02

25

109

5सी

00

03

15

109

10

00

01

25

109

11

00

01

95

109

5बी

00

06

15

109

1बी

00

03

70

109

3

00

01

00

109

2

00

03

80

108

2सी2

00

03

00

108

2बी

00

02

15

108

2ए5

00

00

75

106

17ए2

00

00

40

106

17ए1

00

00

40

106

17बी

00

09

70

106

2

00

04

65

106

1सी

00

01

70

106

1डी

00

04

40

106

1बी

00

04

40

3832

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

106

5

00

00

65

103

4बी

00

06

50

103

7

00

03

40

103

5बी

00

04

00

103

5सी

00

05

85

100

2

00

07

00

100

3बी

00

00

40

100

3ए

00

02

85

100

1बी

00

02

60

100

5ए1

00

06

15

100

5ए2

00

02

85

99

3

00

11

75

99

5

00

00

50

99

4डी

00

00

75

99

4ई

00

06

30

99

4ए

00

01

60

87

4

00

06

30

87

2सी

00

12

25

87

2ए

00

07

20

87

1

00

12

80

87

3ए

00

03

80

कडलाड़ी

15 एस वागैकुलम

6

1ए

00

31

80

6

2ए/2

00

00

65

6

2ए1

00

04

90

6

2सी

00

03

00

6

2डी

00

00

40

7

3बी

00

00

40

7

3सी

00

02

30

7

3डी

00

07

15

7

3ई

00

02

85

7

3जी

00

04

95

7

2ई

00

04

25

7

2ए

00

04

50

7

1एफ

00

04

45

7

1बी

00

00

40

7

1सी

00

03

55

7

1डी

00

00

95

5

2बी

00

05

10

5

2ए

00

03

85

5

3डी

00

00

40

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3833

4

3

00

17

40

3

7

00

24

55

3

2

00

20

50

3

1ए1बी

00

05

50

19

00

20

40

कडलाड़ी

3 अव„ा डै

81

2

00

31

50

88

00

00

45

90

3

00

01

20

90

5

00

07

00

91

2

00

18

50

91

1

00

18

75

92

2

00

03

45

92

1

00

16

60

95

2

00

02

00

95

1

00

07

25

96

3

00

11

55

96

1

00

25

65

97

16

00

00

40

183

10ए

00

10

00

183

10बी

00

05

10

183

3

00

04

25

183

7

00

00

40

186

8

00

05

10

186

6

00

01

40

186

1बी

00

06

50

186

7

00

00

60

186

10

00

04

50

187

5

00

00

40

187

6

00

04

50

187

3

00

04

75

187

7

00

02

10

190

1

00

06

50

191

12

00

02

00

191

9

00

03

00

191

10

00

08

70

191

8

00

00

40

191

13/बी

00

17

45

207

4

00

02

65

207

1

00

03

45

208

4

00

01

35

3834

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

208

7

00

04

70

208

5

00

03

60

208

6

00

03

60

209

7

00

08

25

209

6

00

00

70

209

8

00

13

70

211

3

00

05

60

211

4

00

00

60

211

2

00

04

50

213

7

00

08

25

213

5

00

05

35

213

9

00

00

70

213

4

00

05

50

213

8

00

02

60

213

6

00

08

80

213

3सी

00

02

00

213

3डी

00

06

80

279

1

00

11

60

280

4

00

07

25

280

1

00

07

45

280

3

00

06

40

280

2

00

13

40

281

6

00

00

40

281

5बी2

00

00

55

282

1ए

00

19

40

282

1सी1

00

09

50

282

1बी

00

09

75

283

1

00

38

00

285

7

00

06

40

305

2

00

13

30

306

8

00

10

00

306

7

00

00

40

306

3

00

07

55

306

9

00

01

60

306

5

00

06

00

306

4

00

01

75

306

6

00

10

80

306

2

00

00

90

307

1

00

16

00

307

2

00

09

65

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3835

312

4बी

00

00

40

312

4ए

00

02

65

312

3

00

08

10

316

6बी

00

12

40

316

5

00

02

60

338

1

00

27

50

338

2ए

00

00

60

339

3

00

05

00

339

2

00

16

00

339

6

00

06

30

339

5

00

07

40

339

1बी

00

00

40

339

7ए

00

07

75

344

1

00

12

80

344

2

00

09

50

344

3

00

00

40

345

2

00

00

40

345

9

00

06

00

346

3

00

14

70

346

2

00

15

50

347

2

00

09

25

347

4ए

00

00

60

347

3बी

00

03

70

347

3ए

00

14

40

347

1

00

06

50

348

1

00

22

50

349

00

00

40

कडलाड़ी

4 ए नेडुंकुलम

45

8

00

00

40

45

9

00

04

00

45

10

00

03

50

45

11

00

07

20

45

14

00

07

30

45

6ए

00

03

15

45

6बी

00

06

00

45

7ए

00

03

65

45

7बी

00

00

70

46

9

00

01

65

46

8ए

00

03

50

46

8बी

00

01

70

50

7

00

07

90

3836

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

50

8

00

07

65

50

6ए

00

02

30

50

6बी

00

04

65

50

9ए

00

05

50

50

9बी

00

04

90

57

1

00

10

60

57

4

00

08

00

57

5

00

00

40

59

5

00

11

30

59

6ए

00

09

00

59

6बी

00

08

10

61

1

00

21

25

61

2

00

07

70

61

3

00

01

60

63

2

00

11

75

63

1ए

00

00

60

63

1बी

00

13

00

63

3बी

00

00

40

108

3

00

04

75

108

1ए

00

07

90

108

2ए

00

02

75

109

2

00

08

80

109

1ए

00

07

30

109

1बी

00

00

40

109

4ए

00

09

50

110

1बी

00

08

20

110

2बी

00

09

75

110

3बी

00

01

25

113

2ए

00

03

75

113

2बी

00

00

40

113

3डी

00

00

70

113

3ई

00

06

40

113

3एफ

00

01

10

114

3

00

03

10

114

4

00

04

10

114

6

00

03

00

114

11

00

01

20

114

1बी

00

04

85

114

1सी

00

06

80

114

7ए1

00

01

90

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3837

114

7ए2

00

06

80

115

1ए

00

01

00

115

1बी

00

01

00

116

5

00

04

00

116

6ए

00

01

00

116

6बी

00

04

40

116

8

00

08

40

116

9

00

11

10

116

11

00

01

15

116

4ए

00

03

70

116

4बी

00

04

70

120

15

00

08

90

130

11

00

23

50

132

7

00

04

90

132

2बी

00

04

60

132

8बी2

00

03

70

134

6बी

00

00

60

134

6डी

00

01

85

134

6ई

00

04

20

134

6एच

00

09

95

135

4

00

03

85

135

5

00

02

20

135

6

00

04

65

135

7

00

04

05

135

8

00

04

60

172

16

00

00

40

172

17

00

03

20

172

21

00

06

50

172

22

00

04

95

172

1सी

00

04

40

172

1डी

00

01

00

173

6

00

09

75

173

3ई

00

00

40

173

4बी

00

03

50

173

5बी1

00

00

45

173

5बी2

00

03

75

173

5सी

00

00

55

174

15

00

24

45

174

14सी

00

00

40

175

10

00

01

25

3838

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

211

2

00

03

65

211

3बी

00

04

55

211

3सी

00

06

60

211

3डी

00

06

70

211

4ए

00

00

80

211

5ए

00

03

10

211

6ए

00

05

40

212

3

00

07

55

212

1सी

00

04

05

212

6बी1

00

02

20

212

6बी2

00

07

90

213

10

00

03

20

213

6ए

00

00

55

213

6बी

00

03

25

213

7ए

00

07

00

213

7बी

00

01

30

213

8ए

00

03

60

213

9ए

00

04

20

226

2

00

00

40

226

4

00

10

90

226

8

00

04

60

226

7ए

00

07

60

226

7बी

00

00

40

226

9बी1

00

02

70

226

9बी2

00

02

60

230

2

00

18

65

230

1ए4

00

10

00

230

1बी1

00

30

20

230

1बी2

00

08

00

231

2

00

11

30

231

3

00

05

40

231

1बी

00

00

40

231

1सी

00

04

90

231

1डी

00

05

80

231

1ई

00

03

40

234

00

01

25

कडलाड़ी

66 को‡रसन कोै

464

3

00

04

35

453

1

00

00

80

457

1बी

00

03

45

457

1ए1

00

05

90

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3839

457

1ए2

00

06

25

457

2

00

29

40

452

2

00

14

75

450

2

00

00

40

450

1

00

20

90

449

5

00

05

60

449

7बी

00

00

40

449

4

00

05

55

449

7ए

00

04

70

449

3

00

13

70

449

2बी

00

00

40

447

7सी

00

00

40

448

2

00

07

95

448

1

00

05

80

448

4ए

00

03

75

448

4बी

00

04

75

448

4सी

00

04

55

448

4डी

00

05

50

433

8ए

00

08

85

433

8बी

00

00

85

433

7

00

09

15

433

2

00

09

10

433

1

00

00

45

430

1

00

03

70

430

3

00

25

60

कडलाड़ी

7 कडुनलानपी

105

7ए

00

00

40

105

6

00

04

90

106

5बी1

00

00

40

106

5बी2

00

07

40

106

4

00

08

65

106

3

00

06

50

118

2ए

00

18

90

118

2बी

00

03

50

118

4ए

00

08

70

118

5ए

00

02

90

118

1

00

03

55

118

3

00

01

10

124

3बी

00

13

50

127

4

00

01

10

127

1

00

00

45

3840

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

127

2

00

25

90

127

3

00

08

30

132

2

00

07

20

132

1यू

00

06

00

134

1ए

00

23

65

137

5

00

29

60

140

2सी

00

16

20

140

2डी

00

05

30

140

2बी

00

02

30

140

3

00

07

70

212

5

00

06

65

212

4ए

00

00

65

212

6

00

05

90

212

4बी

00

05

00

212

3

00

06

00

212

1बी

00

09

70

212

1ए

00

02

90

212

2

00

02

10

214

3

00

12

60

214

1बी

00

09

45

214

4बी

00

00

40

214

2

00

10

80

214

4ए

00

09

10

219

6बी

00

01

10

220

1

00

25

10

220

2

00

11

70

220

4

00

02

30

220

3

00

12

80

221

1

00

01

65

221

3बी

00

06

70

221

3ए

00

07

10

229

1

00

11

60

230

2बी

00

13

70

230

2ए

00

12

00

231

3बी

00

06

25

231

2

00

01

30

231

3ए

00

11

60

232

1डी

00

00

40

232

3बी

00

20

70

232

1बी

00

14

50

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3841

232

1सी

00

08

80

233

2

00

11

00

324

4

00

00

70

326

3ए2

00

09

00

326

3ए1

00

06

50

326

3ए4

00

09

25

326

3ए3

00

08

85

326

3बी

00

22

05

332

2

00

11

00

333

3डी2

00

11

50

333

5बी

00

04

20

349

1ए1

00

15

70

350

1ए

00

16

85

350

1बी

00

00

40

350

1सी

00

09

80

350

2ए

00

02

10

351

2बी3

00

10

10

353

1

00

41

00

मुदुकुल„ूर

8 मेल िसरपोतु

266

2ए

00

05

25

266

2बी

00

04

90

266

3ए

00

04

85

266

3बी

00

05

15

267

2ए

00

11

75

269

1ए

00

07

55

269

1बी

00

07

55

269

2ए

00

04

15

269

2बी

00

04

35

269

3ए

00

08

30

270

1बी

00

03

90

270

2ए

00

03

85

270

3सी

00

00

50

271

1ए

00

08

95

289

1ए

00

04

45

289

1बी

00

04

45

289

1सी

00

04

45

289

1डी

00

05

10

289

3ए

00

02

50

289

3बी

00

06

85

291

1ए

00

03

45

290

7

00

19

35

3842

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

290

13ए

00

04

40

290

13बी

00

04

40

290

13सी

00

07

60

290

12बी

00

00

40

290

12सी

00

01

10

कुमुदी

47 एम पुदुकुलम

1

12

00

02

80

1

13

00

07

90

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/99/2017-ओआर-I/ई-8030]

पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018

S.O. 808.—Whereas, by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural

Gas number S.O. 563(E) dated: 15.02.2017 issued under sub section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals

Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (herein after referred to as the said Act) the

Central Government declared its intention to acquire the Right of User in the Lands specified in the Schedule appended

to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of Natural Gas, a pipeline “Ennore-

Tiruvallur -Bengaluru -Pondicherry -Nagapattinam –Madurai- Tuticorin” should be laid in the State of Tamil Nadu by

Indian Oil Corporation Limited.

And whereas, copies of the said notifications were made available to the public from 01.03.2017.

And whereas, the Competent Authority in pursuance of sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act has

submitted his report to the Central Government;

And whereas, the Central Government, after considering the said report is satisfied that the Right of User in

the Land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification should be acquired;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby declares that the Right of User in the said Land specified in the Schedule appended to this

notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby directs that the Right of User in the said Land shall instead of vesting in the Central Government,

vest from the date of publication of this declaration, in the Indian Oil Corporation Limited free from all encumbrances.

Indian Oil Corporation Limited shall be exclusively liable for any compensation in terms of section 10 of the P

& M P Act, 1962 and no suit, claim or legal proceeding would lie against the Central Government on any matter

relating to pipeline.

SCHEDULE

District : Ramanathapuram

State : Tamil Nadu

Name of the Taluk

Name of the Village

Survey No.

Sub

Division

No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Square

Meter

1

2

3

4

5

6

Kadaladi

40 Keerandai

251

18

00

03

70

251

19

00

03

00

251

17

00

10

30

251

9B

00

06

90

251

10

00

01

25

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3843

251

15A1

00

04

90

251

15A2

00

00

40

251

11

00

05

60

256

7A

00

02

70

256

5

00

06

95

256

10A

00

00

40

256

1

00

05

00

258

3D

00

04

35

258

3B

00

02

70

258

3A

00

01

00

258

2

00

03

45

258

1

00

02

90

259

9B

00

00

90

259

10

00

07

60

259

7

00

02

95

259

5

00

03

90

259

3A

00

06

30

259

3B

00

04

60

265

6

00

03

60

265

7

00

00

40

265

5B

00

06

80

265

5A

00

09

55

265

1

00

02

00

270

1

00

00

40

266

2

00

13

00

266

3A

00

00

40

266

4

00

01

60

266

5

00

05

50

266

6A

00

01

40

266

7

00

01

20

266

1B

00

02

45

266

1A

00

06

00

267

2C3

00

04

40

267

2C2

00

06

15

267

2C1

00

05

05

267

2A

00

00

65

267

4

00

00

40

267

5

00

01

90

150

6A

00

09

00

3844

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

173

8A

00

10

10

173

7A

00

10

80

173

3C

00

03

70

173

3D

00

03

00

173

3E

00

00

80

173

2B

00

03

50

173

3G

00

02

30

173

3H

00

02

90

173

3I

00

03

60

173

3J

00

03

45

173

3K

00

02

90

173

3L

00

03

40

172

5C4

00

02

70

172

5B

00

00

40

172

9

00

06

70

172

7

00

11

85

172

6A

00

02

25

172

6B

00

10

00

158

1

00

01

20

170

5B

00

06

50

159

2B

00

02

80

159

2A

00

04

35

159

1C

00

17

20

159

1B

00

01

35

166

10A1A

00

06

40

166

10A1B

00

10

00

166

10A1C

00

00

90

166

7

00

08

30

166

8A

00

09

70

104

1

00

00

60

104

2

00

13

65

104

3

00

01

25

78

7

00

10

45

103

3B

00

12

25

103

3C

00

03

10

103

2B

00

06

80

105

1

00

01

45

102

1B2

00

08

00

102

2

00

12

00

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3845

102

3

00

13

00

101

10

00

01

55

106

1D

00

00

50

106

1C

00

03

60

106

1B

00

04

35

106

1A

00

03

10

110

1A

00

11

15

98

2B

00

02

00

98

1E

00

03

30

98

1F1

00

09

80

98

1F2

00

02

55

98

1F3

00

01

35

113

7B

00

00

80

113

7A

00

01

40

113

4

00

04

20

113

3C

00

00

40

113

5

00

05

70

113

2

00

00

60

113

6

00

04

45

113

1C2

00

07

35

113

1C1

00

04

85

113

1B

00

00

70

116

1

00

13

00

115

3

00

10

45

127

00

04

60

430

13

00

04

15

430

14

00

09

30

430

7

00

03

35

430

6

00

03

85

430

5

00

06

10

430

4

00

00

40

433

1

00

00

40

432

14

00

06

90

432

13

00

03

40

432

11

00

06

50

432

9

00

07

10

432

10

00

00

45

432

8

00

00

60

432

6

00

00

40

3846

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

436

00

04

50

425

1

00

26

10

19

7

00

11

70

2

8

00

06

95

2

9

00

00

40

2

10

00

13

15

2

7

00

25

90

Kadaladi

23 Orivayal

252

00

32

60

253

1

00

06

80

248

2

00

20

50

248

1

00

14

00

249

1

00

16

75

158

2

00

00

40

158

1

00

13

25

154

1C

00

01

30

154

1B

00

04

45

154

1A

00

09

75

153

3

00

20

90

153

1

00

00

50

153

2

00

27

00

151

4

00

09

20

151

3

00

09

55

150

5

00

14

95

150

2

00

11

60

149

4

00

16

70

149

1

00

04

50

148

00

07

20

147

2

00

06

70

147

1

00

07

00

146

2

00

07

60

146

1

00

06

90

145

2

00

13

70

24

3

00

05

45

24

24

00

01

00

24

2C4

00

03

70

24

23

00

00

40

24

2C3

00

06

40

24

2C2

00

06

75

24

2B3

00

02

40

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3847

24

2B2

00

04

15

24

2B1

00

04

85

24

19

00

08

80

24

18

00

04

60

24

17

00

07

20

24

2A2

00

05

20

24

2A1

00

09

00

23

2

00

10

90

22

3E

00

05

40

22

3F

00

03

20

21

2B2

00

00

45

21

2B1

00

02

25

21

2A2

00

03

00

21

2A3

00

04

20

21

2A1

00

06

85

21

3A

00

00

65

21

1A

00

05

75

Kadaladi

22 Marandai

380

00

07

55

382

3B

00

03

70

382

4B

00

12

85

382

4A

00

19

50

382

5

00

00

40

383

1B

00

08

65

383

1A

00

08

65

384

2B

00

09

25

384

2A

00

02

50

384

3

00

18

35

384

4

00

07

95

385

3B

00

11

15

385

2

00

00

40

385

4

00

02

50

385

5

00

13

05

385

6

00

00

65

386

6

00

08

45

386

5B

00

00

40

386

5C

00

06

50

386

5D

00

00

60

386

4B

00

06

15

387

3B

00

15

50

3848

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

387

3A

00

02

00

387

2B

00

01

00

387

2A

00

18

10

387

1

00

15

50

388

1A

00

11

90

388

2A

00

12

60

389

1

00

12

25

389

2

00

11

90

356

2

00

03

20

356

1

00

10

30

356

4A

00

11

70

356

4C

00

05

25

355

4

00

22

75

355

3D

00

01

90

355

3E

00

04

90

352

5

00

05

80

352

4B

00

13

45

352

4A

00

04

50

352

3

00

07

60

352

2B

00

04

15

352

2A

00

04

00

351

5

00

08

30

351

4C

00

15

30

351

3H

00

03

00

351

3I

00

01

10

351

3J

00

00

40

351

2E

00

03

40

351

2D

00

01

65

351

2C

00

00

40

350

10

00

21

60

Kadaladi

21 Punavasal

236

2A

00

19

30

237

1

00

05

85

237

3B

00

02

90

237

3A

00

09

75

378

3

00

09

00

378

4A

00

02

10

234

4B1

00

00

60

234

4B2

00

01

35

377

1D

00

03

20

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3849

377

1E

00

03

60

377

3A3

00

09

50

375

1

00

02

55

374

1A

00

07

30

374

3F

00

09

20

374

2A

00

04

50

374

2B

00

03

90

374

3I

00

04

75

374

3J

00

01

00

374

4C

00

03

70

374

5A

00

03

70

374

5B

00

04

60

372

1

00

01

85

372

2

00

00

90

372

3

00

05

00

371

1A

00

05

15

371

2A

00

05

00

371

2B2

00

02

30

371

3A

00

06

55

371

3B

00

06

15

370

1B

00

07

20

370

2A

00

03

10

370

2B

00

01

45

368

1

00

07

40

368

3

00

08

85

367

1B1

00

11

40

367

2

00

03

70

366

1

00

00

40

366

2

00

01

50

366

3

00

02

80

366

4

00

04

20

366

5A

00

04

20

366

6A

00

02

40

366

5C

00

06

20

366

5D

00

07

45

421

1A

00

22

60

421

1D1

00

03

65

421

1B2

00

20

45

424

4

00

03

65

3850

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

425

1

00

04

75

425

2

00

03

30

427

1

00

01

60

427

2

00

01

60

427

3A

00

02

15

427

3B

00

03

90

427

4A

00

03

70

427

4B

00

03

90

426

1A

00

02

35

428

1

00

06

30

428

2

00

06

30

428

3

00

09

15

428

5

00

12

55

430

2A

00

02

85

431

2

00

04

20

433

1A

00

01

60

433

1B

00

02

40

433

1C

00

02

75

433

2

00

04

80

433

3

00

00

75

433

4A

00

02

75

433

4B1

00

01

75

433

4B2

00

01

75

438

1A1

00

06

60

438

1B1

00

01

60

438

1B2

00

04

60

438

2B

00

06

75

438

3A

00

11

90

439

1A

00

33

60

Kadaladi

18 K Veppangulam

70

3

00

04

50

70

6

00

23

60

70

4

00

00

40

70

2

00

08

90

70

1

00

07

00

73

6E

00

00

40

73

6F

00

01

50

73

6G

00

03

80

73

1H

00

00

40

74

3

00

00

80

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3851

74

2

00

04

00

74

4

00

25

00

77

3A1

00

06

55

77

3A2

00

09

10

77

2C

00

00

40

77

2B

00

02

00

77

2A

00

11

20

131

4A

00

06

35

134

2D

00

00

40

134

2F

00

08

10

134

3

00

03

00

135

5

00

15

60

135

3A

00

03

55

135

7B

00

05

95

136

2A

00

01

25

136

2B

00

06

30

136

7C

00

05

35

136

3B

00

11

20

136

6

00

03

20

144

3

00

04

30

144

7A

00

07

15

144

4B

00

03

50

144

4A

00

06

80

155

3B

00

06

35

155

3C

00

02

55

155

4A

00

01

50

155

4B

00

00

40

158

1A4

00

04

30

158

2

00

01

30

158

3

00

06

35

158

6A

00

03

70

158

7A1

00

05

80

158

1A6

00

02

00

158

6B

00

03

00

158

4B

00

02

10

158

1A5

00

01

00

160

1B

00

03

75

160

33

00

06

15

160

1D

00

06

55

3852

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

160

1A

00

00

95

160

1C

00

05

10

161

2A2

00

08

00

164

1

00

03

60

164

2A1

00

24

40

164

4

00

00

65

165

3H

00

07

00

179

3

00

04

00

179

2

00

05

85

179

4B1

00

03

90

180

4A1

00

04

60

180

4A2

00

06

10

181

7B

00

05

65

186

2

00

13

70

186

3

00

01

65

186

4

00

10

90

190

1

00

09

35

190

2

00

11

10

191

6A2

00

04

30

191

7A

00

00

40

191

5B

00

01

50

191

6A1

00

05

90

200

4

00

00

40

200

6

00

00

40

200

5

00

03

50

200

7A

00

00

95

200

8

00

12

10

Kadaladi

19 Appanur

319

1A

00

16

20

319

1B

00

10

35

319

2

00

05

20

339

1

00

08

60

340

1

00

01

65

340

2

00

24

45

340

4

00

09

00

344

3

00

22

00

344

2

00

06

40

351

3C

00

09

90

351

1A

00

11

00

350

2B

00

20

00

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3853

350

2A

00

00

40

350

3

00

27

75

358

1A

00

08

70

348

5B

00

04

00

348

5A

00

04

00

348

4B

00

06

75

348

4A

00

07

00

348

3B

00

00

65

359

3B

00

05

25

359

3A

00

05

30

Kadaladi

17 Maravar Karisalkulam

297

2

00

33

50

295

2B

00

13

00

295

2A

00

07

10

294

2

00

07

60

301

1

00

01

30

293

2

00

28

75

303

2

00

06

80

303

3B

00

13

00

303

4

00

16

65

311

1B

00

00

40

311

1A

00

07

40

304

2

00

15

15

304

1B2

00

06

00

304

1B1

00

07

00

304

1A4

00

00

40

308

1

00

11

55

308

2

00

11

15

284

3

00

05

10

283

1A1

00

04

70

283

1A2

00

04

35

283

1A3

00

05

05

283

1A4

00

04

00

283

1A5

00

01

50

283

1A6

00

00

40

282

2B

00

04

85

282

1B

00

09

55

282

1A

00

03

00

277

1A

00

00

90

3854

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

281

2C

00

00

65

280

3

00

11

00

280

2

00

09

75

280

1A2

00

00

40

280

1A3

00

08

10

280

1B

00

03

60

176

2

00

10

80

175

14B

00

01

65

175

14A

00

00

40

175

14C

00

06

60

175

13

00

07

40

180

5B

00

09

60

177

3B

00

04

85

177

3A

00

07

75

177

1A

00

00

50

177

1B

00

10

70

178

10A

00

08

30

178

9B

00

00

40

178

8

00

08

25

178

2

00

00

95

178

3

00

07

70

178

1

00

07

20

199

2

00

10

65

200

3

00

18

90

200

2

00

13

90

200

1B

00

06

00

200

1A2

00

06

85

201

3

00

09

30

201

2

00

09

35

201

1

00

13

15

138

1

00

06

85

139

2C

00

00

40

139

3A

00

11

65

139

3B

00

25

55

132

3A

00

01

75

132

1A

00

02

80

131

16

00

02

40

131

14B

00

03

40

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3855

131

14A

00

03

80

131

13

00

07

20

131

12A

00

03

40

131

12B

00

05

50

131

1B

00

01

50

131

1A

00

00

40

131

2B

00

09

35

131

2A

00

01

00

131

3

00

00

75

140

2C

00

04

70

126

2C

00

03

10

126

2D

00

01

05

126

2B1

00

02

35

126

2A

00

02

20

126

3B

00

04

05

126

3A

00

02

70

126

4A

00

12

00

126

4B1

00

00

60

126

1

00

00

40

125

1H

00

33

50

124

4B2

00

00

50

124

5C

00

02

75

124

5B

00

02

75

124

5A

00

03

00

124

2B

00

04

95

124

6A

00

03

75

124

1

00

03

15

109

17A

00

00

75

109

19

00

01

20

109

17B1

00

05

80

109

9B

00

02

25

109

9C

00

02

25

109

5C

00

03

15

109

10

00

01

25

109

11

00

01

95

109

5B

00

06

15

109

1B

00

03

70

109

3

00

01

00

3856

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

109

2

00

03

80

108

2C2

00

03

00

108

2B

00

02

15

108

2A5

00

00

75

106

17A2

00

00

40

106

17A1

00

00

40

106

17B

00

09

70

106

2

00

04

65

106

1C

00

01

70

106

1D

00

04

40

106

1B

00

04

40

106

5

00

00

65

103

4B

00

06

50

103

7

00

03

40

103

5B

00

04

00

103

5C

00

05

85

100

2

00

07

00

100

3B

00

00

40

100

3A

00

02

85

100

1B

00

02

60

100

5A1

00

06

15

100

5A2

00

02

85

99

3

00

11

75

99

5

00

00

50

99

4D

00

00

75

99

4E

00

06

30

99

4A

00

01

60

87

4

00

06

30

87

2C

00

12

25

87

2A

00

07

20

87

1

00

12

80

87

3A

00

03

80

Kadaladi

15 S Vagaikkulam

6

1A

00

31

80

6

2A/2

00

00

65

6

2A1

00

04

90

6

2C

00

03

00

6

2D

00

00

40

7

3B

00

00

40

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3857

7

3C

00

02

30

7

3D

00

07

15

7

3E

00

02

85

7

3G

00

04

95

7

2E

00

04

25

7

2A

00

04

50

7

1F

00

04

45

7

1B

00

00

40

7

1C

00

03

55

7

1D

00

00

95

5

2B

00

05

10

5

2A

00

03

85

5

3D

00

00

40

4

3

00

17

40

3

7

00

24

55

3

2

00

20

50

3

1A1B

00

05

50

19

00

20

40

Kadaladi

3 Avathandai

81

2

00

31

50

88

00

00

45

90

3

00

01

20

90

5

00

07

00

91

2

00

18

50

91

1

00

18

75

92

2

00

03

45

92

1

00

16

60

95

2

00

02

00

95

1

00

07

25

96

3

00

11

55

96

1

00

25

65

97

16

00

00

40

183

10A

00

10

00

183

10B

00

05

10

183

3

00

04

25

183

7

00

00

40

186

8

00

05

10

186

6

00

01

40

186

1B

00

06

50

3858

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

186

7

00

00

60

186

10

00

04

50

187

5

00

00

40

187

6

00

04

50

187

3

00

04

75

187

7

00

02

10

190

1

00

06

50

191

12

00

02

00

191

9

00

03

00

191

10

00

08

70

191

8

00

00

40

191

13/B

00

17

45

207

4

00

02

65

207

1

00

03

45

208

4

00

01

35

208

7

00

04

70

208

5

00

03

60

208

6

00

03

60

209

7

00

08

25

209

6

00

00

70

209

8

00

13

70

211

3

00

05

60

211

4

00

00

60

211

2

00

04

50

213

7

00

08

25

213

5

00

05

35

213

9

00

00

70

213

4

00

05

50

213

8

00

02

60

213

6

00

08

80

213

3C

00

02

00

213

3D

00

06

80

279

1

00

11

60

280

4

00

07

25

280

1

00

07

45

280

3

00

06

40

280

2

00

13

40

281

6

00

00

40

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3859

281

5B2

00

00

55

282

1A

00

19

40

282

1C1

00

09

50

282

1B

00

09

75

283

1

00

38

00

285

7

00

06

40

305

2

00

13

30

306

8

00

10

00

306

7

00

00

40

306

3

00

07

55

306

9

00

01

60

306

5

00

06

00

306

4

00

01

75

306

6

00

10

80

306

2

00

00

90

307

1

00

16

00

307

2

00

09

65

312

4B

00

00

40

312

4A

00

02

65

312

3

00

08

10

316

6B

00

12

40

316

5

00

02

60

338

1

00

27

50

338

2A

00

00

60

339

3

00

05

00

339

2

00

16

00

339

6

00

06

30

339

5

00

07

40

339

1B

00

00

40

339

7A

00

07

75

344

1

00

12

80

344

2

00

09

50

344

3

00

00

40

345

2

00

00

40

345

9

00

06

00

346

3

00

14

70

346

2

00

15

50

347

2

00

09

25

3860

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

347

4A

00

00

60

347

3B

00

03

70

347

3A

00

14

40

347

1

00

06

50

348

1

00

22

50

349

00

00

40

Kadaladi

4 A Nedunkulam

45

8

00

00

40

45

9

00

04

00

45

10

00

03

50

45

11

00

07

20

45

14

00

07

30

45

6A

00

03

15

45

6B

00

06

00

45

7A

00

03

65

45

7B

00

00

70

46

9

00

01

65

46

8A

00

03

50

46

8B

00

01

70

50

7

00

07

90

50

8

00

07

65

50

6A

00

02

30

50

6B

00

04

65

50

9A

00

05

50

50

9B

00

04

90

57

1

00

10

60

57

4

00

08

00

57

5

00

00

40

59

5

00

11

30

59

6A

00

09

00

59

6B

00

08

10

61

1

00

21

25

61

2

00

07

70

61

3

00

01

60

63

2

00

11

75

63

1A

00

00

60

63

1B

00

13

00

63

3B

00

00

40

108

3

00

04

75

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3861

108

1A

00

07

90

108

2A

00

02

75

109

2

00

08

80

109

1A

00

07

30

109

1B

00

00

40

109

4A

00

09

50

110

1B

00

08

20

110

2B

00

09

75

110

3B

00

01

25

113

2A

00

03

75

113

2B

00

00

40

113

3D

00

00

70

113

3E

00

06

40

113

3F

00

01

10

114

3

00

03

10

114

4

00

04

10

114

6

00

03

00

114

11

00

01

20

114

1B

00

04

85

114

1C

00

06

80

114

7A1

00

01

90

114

7A2

00

06

80

115

1A

00

01

00

115

1B

00

01

00

116

5

00

04

00

116

6A

00

01

00

116

6B

00

04

40

116

8

00

08

40

116

9

00

11

10

116

11

00

01

15

116

4A

00

03

70

116

4B

00

04

70

120

15

00

08

90

130

11

00

23

50

132

7

00

04

90

132

2B

00

04

60

132

8B2

00

03

70

134

6B

00

00

60

3862

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

134

6D

00

01

85

134

6E

00

04

20

134

6H

00

09

95

135

4

00

03

85

135

5

00

02

20

135

6

00

04

65

135

7

00

04

05

135

8

00

04

60

172

16

00

00

40

172

17

00

03

20

172

21

00

06

50

172

22

00

04

95

172

1C

00

04

40

172

1D

00

01

00

173

6

00

09

75

173

3E

00

00

40

173

4B

00

03

50

173

5B1

00

00

45

173

5B2

00

03

75

173

5C

00

00

55

174

15

00

24

45

174

14C

00

00

40

175

10

00

01

25

211

2

00

03

65

211

3B

00

04

55

211

3C

00

06

60

211

3D

00

06

70

211

4A

00

00

80

211

5A

00

03

10

211

6A

00

05

40

212

3

00

07

55

212

1C

00

04

05

212

6B1

00

02

20

212

6B2

00

07

90

213

10

00

03

20

213

6A

00

00

55

213

6B

00

03

25

213

7A

00

07

00

213

7B

00

01

30

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3863

213

8A

00

03

60

213

9A

00

04

20

226

2

00

00

40

226

4

00

10

90

226

8

00

04

60

226

7A

00

07

60

226

7B

00

00

40

226

9B1

00

02

70

226

9B2

00

02

60

230

2

00

18

65

230

1A4

00

10

00

230

1B1

00

30

20

230

1B2

00

08

00

231

2

00

11

30

231

3

00

05

40

231

1B

00

00

40

231

1C

00

04

90

231

1D

00

05

80

231

1E

00

03

40

234

00

01

25

Kadaladi

66 Kokkarasan Kottai

464

3

00

04

35

453

1

00

00

80

457

1B

00

03

45

457

1A1

00

05

90

457

1A2

00

06

25

457

2

00

29

40

452

2

00

14

75

450

2

00

00

40

450

1

00

20

90

449

5

00

05

60

449

7B

00

00

40

449

4

00

05

55

449

7A

00

04

70

449

3

00

13

70

449

2B

00

00

40

447

7C

00

00

40

448

2

00

07

95

448

1

00

05

80

448

4A

00

03

75

3864

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

448

4B

00

04

75

448

4C

00

04

55

448

4D

00

05

50

433

8A

00

08

85

433

8B

00

00

85

433

7

00

09

15

433

2

00

09

10

433

1

00

00

45

430

1

00

03

70

430

3

00

25

60

Kadaladi

7 Kondunallanpatti

105

7A

00

00

40

105

6

00

04

90

106

5B1

00

00

40

106

5B2

00

07

40

106

4

00

08

65

106

3

00

06

50

118

2A

00

18

90

118

2B

00

03

50

118

4A

00

08

70

118

5A

00

02

90

118

1

00

03

55

118

3

00

01

10

124

3B

00

13

50

127

4

00

01

10

127

1

00

00

45

127

2

00

25

90

127

3

00

08

30

132

2

00

07

20

132

1Q

00

06

00

134

1A

00

23

65

137

5

00

29

60

140

2C

00

16

20

140

2D

00

05

30

140

2B

00

02

30

140

3

00

07

70

212

5

00

06

65

212

4A

00

00

65

212

6

00

05

90

212

4B

00

05

00

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3865

212

3

00

06

00

212

1B

00

09

70

212

1A

00

02

90

212

2

00

02

10

214

3

00

12

60

214

1B

00

09

45

214

4B

00

00

40

214

2

00

10

80

214

4A

00

09

10

219

6B

00

01

10

220

1

00

25

10

220

2

00

11

70

220

4

00

02

30

220

3

00

12

80

221

1

00

01

65

221

3B

00

06

70

221

3A

00

07

10

229

1

00

11

60

230

2B

00

13

70

230

2A

00

12

00

231

3B

00

06

25

231

2

00

01

30

231

3A

00

11

60

232

1D

00

00

40

232

3B

00

20

70

232

1B

00

14

50

232

1C

00

08

80

233

2

00

11

00

324

4

00

00

70

326

3A2

00

09

00

326

3A1

00

06

50

326

3A4

00

09

25

326

3A3

00

08

85

326

3B

00

22

05

332

2

00

11

00

333

3D2

00

11

50

333

5B

00

04

20

349

1A1

00

15

70

350

1A

00

16

85

3866

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

350

1B

00

00

40

350

1C

00

09

80

350

2A

00

02

10

351

2B3

00

10

10

353

1

00

41

00

Mudukulathur

8 Mela Sirupothu

266

2A

00

05

25

266

2B

00

04

90

266

3A

00

04

85

266

3B

00

05

15

267

2A

00

11

75

269

1A

00

07

55

269

1B

00

07

55

269

2A

00

04

15

269

2B

00

04

35

269

3A

00

08

30

270

1B

00

03

90

270

2A

00

03

85

270

3C

00

00

50

271

1A

00

08

95

289

1A

00

04

45

289

1B

00

04

45

289

1C

00

04

45

289

1D

00

05

10

289

3A

00

02

50

289

3B

00

06

85

291

1A

00

03

45

290

7

00

19

35

290

13A

00

04

40

290

13B

00

04

40

290

13C

00

07

60

290

12B

00

00

40

290

12C

00

01

10

Kamuthi

47 M. Pudukulam

1

12

00

02

80

1

13

00

07

90

[F. No. R-11025(11)/99/2017-OR-I/E-8030]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3867

नई दली, 15 मई, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 809

809

809

809.—के ीय सरकार, पेोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूिम म उपयोग के अिधकार का अज न) अिधिनयम

1962 (1962 का 50) क( धारा 6 क( उप-धारा (1) के )ारा *द+ शि-य. का *योग करते 0ए भारत सरकार के पैोिलयम और

*ाकृितक गैस मं4ालय क( अिधसूचना सं7या का. आ. 2383 तारीख 29.09.2017 म, जो भारत के राजप4, भाग II, ख;ड 3, उपख;ड

(ii), भारत का राजप4 सं. 41 म पृ> 7903 और 7906 म *कािशत क( गई थी, म िन@िलिखत संशोधन करती है, अथा त:-

पृ> 7903 (Bहदी अिधसूचना ) और 7906 (अंCेजी अिधसूचना) म, “44. सडयंकुEपम” गांव के संबंध म "तालुक-पोHेरी,

िजला-ितIवलुर, राKय-तिमलनाडु" क( जगह "तालुक- ितIवोLMयूर, िजला-ितIवलुर, राKय-तिमलनाडु" के Nप मे पढ़ा

जाए।

अिधसूचना का शेष िवषय अपLरवOतत रहगे ।

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/99/2017-ओआर-I/ई-8030]

पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018

S.O. 809.—In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub section (1) of Section 6 of the Petroleum and Minerals

Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 ( 50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby makes the

following amendments in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas

number S.O. 2383 dated the 29.09.2017, published in Part- II, Section 3, Sub section (ii) of the Gazette of India, No.41,

at page No.7903 and 7906 namely:-

In Page 7903 (Hindi Notification) and in Page 7906 (English Notification) for the Village

“44.Sadayankuppam” of “Taluk- Ponneri, District- Tiruvallur, State-Tamil Nadu” may be read as

“44.Sadayankuppam” of “Taluk- Thiruvottiyur, District- Tiruvallur, State-Tamil Nadu”

The other contents of the notification remain unaltered.

[F. No. R-11025(11)/99/2017-OR-I/E-8030]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

नई दली, 15 मई, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 810

810

810

810.—के ीय सरकार, पेोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूिम म उपयोग के अिधकार का अज न) अिधिनयम

1962 (1962 का 50) (िजसे इसम इसके पQात उ- अिधिनयम कहा गया है) क( धारा 3 क( उप-धारा (1) भारत के राजप4,

(असाधारण) के अधीन जारी क( गयी भारत सरकार के पेोिलयम और *ाकृितक गैस मं4ालय क( अिधसूचना का.आ. 334(अ), तारीख

27 जनवरी 2017, )वारा तिमलनाडु राKय म एHोर - ितIवलूर - बगलुI - पांिडचेरी - नागपLMनम - मदुरै - टूLटकोLरन पाइपलाइन

िबछाई जानी चािहए के पLरवहन के िलए इंिडयन ऑयल कापUरेशन िलिमटेड के )ारा पाइपलाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए;

और उ- आिधसूचना क( *ितयाँ जनता को तारीख 09.02.2017 को उपलWद करा दी गई थी।

और उ- अिधिनयम क( धारा 6 क( उप - धारा (1) के अनुसरण म सYम *ािधकारी ने के ीय सरकार को अपनी Lरपोट दे दी

है।

और के ीय सरकार का उ- Lरपोट पर िवचार करने के पQात यह समाधान हो गया है क इस अिधसूचना से संलZ अनुसूची

म िविन[द\ भूिम म उपयोग के अिधकार का अज न कया जाना चािहए।

अत: अब, के ीय सरकार,उ- अिधिनयम क( धारा 6 क( उप-धारा(1) )ारा *द+ शि-य. का *योग करते 0ए यह घोषणा

करती है क इस अिधसूचना के संलZ अनुसूची म िविन[द\ उ- भूिम म पाइपलाइन िबछाने के िलए उपयोग का अिधकार अOजत कया

जाता है।

यह और क के ीय सरकार, उ- अिधिनयम क( धारा 6 क( उप-धारा(4) )ारा *द+ शि-य. का *योग करते 0ए यह िनद`श

देती है क उ- भूिम के उपयोग का अिधकार इस अिधसूचना के *काश क( तारीख से के ीय सरकार म िनिहत होने क( बजाए, सभी

िवलंगम. से मु- हो कर इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपUरेशन िलिमटेड म िनिहत होगा।

3868

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

पैोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन अिधिनयम, 1962 क( धारा 10 के अधीन कसी भी YितपूOत के िलए इंिडयन ऑयल

कॉपUरेशन िलिमटेड पूण तया उ+रदायी होगी और पाइपलाइन से सcबि धत कसी भी मामले पर के ीय सरकार के िवId कोई वाद

दावा या कानूनी काय वाही नहe हो सकेगी।

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

िजला : रामनाथपुरम

राKय : तिमलनाडू

तालुका का नाम

गाँव का नाम

सव`Yण सं.

उप ख;ड सं.

Yे4फल

हेhटेर

एयर

वग मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

रामनाथपुरम

53 वाला तरवै

202

4

00

01

80

202

5बी

00

08

65

96

4ए

00

14

75

96

5ए

00

08

90

96

3

00

17

00

96

2

00

00

40

96

1

00

01

30

95

6डी

00

00

40

95

6ई

00

00

40

95

7

00

10

70

95

3

00

01

45

95

2

00

05

50

95

1

00

07

00

98

2

00

11

90

99

9

00

14

95

99

8

00

03

10

99

5

00

04

70

99

4

00

02

35

99

3

00

02

30

99

1

00

08

30

88

5सी

00

03

95

88

4सी

00

03

90

100

1

00

26

40

100

2ए

00

01

40

101

5ए

00

13

30

101

4बी2

00

00

40

101

5बी

00

15

60

101

5सी

00

01

35

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3869

101

3

00

05

25

101

6ए

00

13

50

102

2

00

08

80

102

3

00

17

60

102

4ए

00

07

00

109

5बी

00

12

10

109

5ए2

00

08

45

109

5ए1

00

06

10

110

9बी

00

04

70

110

9ए

00

04

80

114

2बी1

00

11

50

114

2ए1

00

05

20

114

2ए2

00

00

40

114

1बी2

00

10

30

115

3ए

00

06

25

115

2

00

10

45

113

4

00

16

80

113

5ए

00

02

85

112

3

00

11

50

112

2इी

00

02

15

112

2सी

00

02

70

112

2बी

00

02

35

112

2ए

00

02

30

112

1बी

00

08

10

रामनाथपुरम

52 कुयवनकुडी

181

6सी

00

09

90

181

6बी2

00

08

95

182

1बी

00

08

95

182

2

00

08

85

182

3

00

07

00

183

3

00

21

60

183

2

00

10

90

183

4बी

00

10

50

184

1बी2

00

19

00

184

1बी1

00

04

10

3870

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

185

3सी

00

15

80

185

3बी

00

18

25

189

1

00

06

35

189

2बी

00

04

90

189

2ए

00

03

50

190

1ए1

00

07

95

190

1ए2

00

01

95

168

4सी

00

05

70

167

1ए

00

12

15

167

3बी1

00

01

15

167

3बी2ए

00

09

40

167

3बी2बी

00

02

00

167

3ए

00

06

75

166

1सी

00

00

40

166

1बी

00

09

70

166

2ए2

00

05

15

166

2ए1

00

00

80

166

3ए

00

09

30

166

4

00

22

30

रामनाथपुरम

46 सiरiोMै

355

2

00

04

50

355

3

00

07

50

355

1ए1

00

06

60

354

2

00

02

70

354

1

00

03

55

351

9

00

00

85

351

12

00

05

45

351

11सी

00

05

45

351

11ए

00

05

25

351

5

00

07

90

351

2ए

00

06

50

351

3ए

00

06

60

351

3बी

00

05

30

361

1ए

00

01

90

361

1बी

00

10

65

361

2

00

00

40

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3871

361

1सी

00

00

40

347

1

00

01

25

347

2ए

00

23

20

347

2बी

00

12

00

362

2

00

02

35

362

3बी

00

06

75

362

4

00

07

20

363

1ए

00

03

25

363

1बी

00

03

30

363

2

00

07

70

363

3

00

06

45

537

3बी

00

12

95

536

4

00

04

50

536

8ए

00

16

40

536

8बी1

00

00

40

536

6

00

07

40

536

7

00

00

65

535

3

00

14

50

534

1

00

12

30

534

3

00

06

50

526

3ए

00

05

00

526

3बी

00

04

20

526

2ए

00

05

85

526

1बी

00

00

40

527

1

00

01

50

527

2

00

02

30

527

4बी

00

03

15

527

5

00

04

15

527

3ए1

00

00

65

527

3ए2

00

02

50

527

3बी

00

03

20

527

3सी

00

03

55

527

3इी

00

03

50

528

3

00

08

20

528

4ए

00

04

40

3872

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

528

4बी

00

04

30

528

5

00

08

35

528

6

00

08

55

528

7

00

08

00

528

8सी

00

04

25

528

9-1

00

03

70

528

9-2

00

03

35

529

1

00

06

45

529

2

00

05

90

529

3

00

05

70

529

4

00

05

55

529

5

00

06

55

502

1ए

00

15

30

502

3ए

00

20

35

504

1बी1ए1

00

28

65

504

2ए1ए

00

05

30

504

2ए1बी

00

05

00

504

2बी

00

05

15

504

3ए

00

05

30

504

3बी

00

04

10

504

4

00

06

90

506

1

00

05

70

506

2

00

03

80

506

3

00

03

95

506

4ए4

00

03

85

506

4सी

00

03

75

506

4बी

00

03

20

506

4इी

00

03

70

506

4ई

00

01

60

500

1

00

02

00

499

1ए

00

08

80

499

2

00

11

35

499

3ए

00

11

10

क(लकरै

47 कुदiोMै

19

6

00

01

70

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3873

19

5

00

09

60

19

4

00

00

80

20

1सी

00

04

55

20

1इी

00

02

80

20

1जे

00

00

60

20

1आई

00

02

80

20

1एच

00

00

85

20

1के

00

03

70

20

1ओ

00

03

30

20

1एन

00

00

95

20

1आर

00

01

15

20

1एस

00

02

45

20

1यु

00

02

70

20

1इजत

00

01

65

20

1वी

00

00

90

20

1वाई

00

00

60

20

1एhस

00

01

70

20

1डबलयू

00

00

80

20

2ए

00

01

30

21

1ए

00

02

10

21

1बी

00

11

40

21

1ई

00

00

60

21

1इी

00

01

65

21

1सी

00

05

80

25

1

00

00

85

26

1ए1

00

06

80

26

1बी

00

02

70

26

1सी

00

03

20

26

2ए

00

03

60

26

2बी

00

02

70

27

2ए4

00

04

35

27

2बी

00

05

45

27

2सी

00

06

45

27

4ए

00

13

60

3874

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

28

6बी

00

15

10

28

6ए

00

19

40

30

8सी

00

00

90

38

3ए

00

12

10

38

4ए

00

08

00

38

4सी1

00

10

10

39

2

00

15

30

39

3जी

00

04

10

39

3आई

00

04

45

39

3जे

00

08

40

39

3एल

00

01

65

39

5

00

03

00

42

5

00

00

60

43

7ए

00

02

00

43

1ए

00

07

10

43

2

00

06

00

43

3ए

00

01

25

151

1इी

00

06

80

151

2ए3

00

03

65

151

1सी

00

01

90

151

2ए2

00

00

60

151

2सी

00

00

60

151

2इी2

00

02

70

151

2ई2

00

02

25

151

3ए2

00

04

50

151

5

00

02

55

151

3बी1

00

01

45

151

4ए2

00

00

60

151

4ए1

00

00

60

152

2बी2

00

00

80

152

2बी1

00

01

10

153

1जी

00

00

65

153

1इी

00

02

80

153

1ई

00

03

00

153

1एफ

00

03

25

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3875

153

2ए

00

08

45

153

3बी

00

09

00

153

4

00

10

10

153

5इी

00

03

40

153

5सी

00

03

00

153

5के1

00

04

80

153

5के2

00

01

10

155

11

00

01

90

155

14ए

00

00

40

155

15ए

00

00

60

155

13ए

00

02

30

155

4बी2

00

00

80

155

4इी

00

04

30

156

1ए

00

05

50

156

1बी

00

07

90

क(लकरै

46 ितIEपुलानी

67

2

00

00

75

67

1ए

00

07

20

67

1बी

00

01

90

66

5ए

00

04

75

66

5बी

00

01

90

65

8इी

00

00

70

65

9जी2

00

05

00

65

9एच

00

00

40

65

9एफ

00

00

70

65

9ई

00

05

45

65

10

00

00

60

65

9इी

00

00

90

65

9सी

00

07

20

65

9बी

00

03

30

69

3ए3

00

10

20

69

1बी

00

02

45

69

1सी

00

06

70

69

2

00

18

40

62

4बी

00

00

60

70

1

00

08

50

3876

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

70

2

00

01

10

59

4

00

11

00

59

5ए

00

03

55

59

5बी

00

04

40

59

6

00

10

75

59

7ए

00

04

30

59

7बी

00

02

80

59

3

00

01

95

58

5

00

00

60

58

2बी

00

05

20

58

2सी

00

00

60

58

2ए

00

03

60

58

3ए

00

01

50

58

1

00

11

90

48

00

02

00

50

12

00

17

85

52

6

00

02

80

52

5

00

14

00

52

7

00

00

60

52

3

00

00

60

53

1बी

00

02

55

53

2

00

01

45

53

3

00

05

00

53

4

00

14

00

53

5ए

00

03

00

53

5बी

00

03

20

53

6

00

02

95

42

1ए

00

08

30

42

1बी

00

07

85

42

2बी

00

01

50

42

2सी

00

01

45

42

3ए

00

02

60

42

4

00

03

20

42

5

00

02

80

42

6

00

02

70

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3877

42

7

00

01

90

42

8ए

00

00

60

43

4जे1

00

06

30

43

4जे2

00

00

60

43

4आई2

00

06

20

43

4एच2

00

02

90

41

00

09

80

78

00

18

40

79

00

01

60

124

1ए2

00

11

60

124

1ए1

00

07

10

128

2

00

23

75

137

9

00

03

05

137

13

00

10

35

137

14

00

07

95

136

2ए2

00

03

55

136

2बी

00

08

90

137

15

00

08

65

137

16

00

09

55

136

1जी

00

00

85

135

3

00

07

60

135

2

00

10

00

135

1

00

07

40

149

2एफ

00

00

60

149

2जी

00

03

10

149

2एच

00

05

10

149

2आई

00

03

75

149

3ए

00

02

60

149

1एफ

00

09

00

149

1सी

00

02

80

149

1इी

00

07

20

157

5

00

18

55

158

11

00

00

60

158

9सी

00

07

00

158

8

00

08

40

3878

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

158

7

00

09

20

158

6बी

00

09

40

158

5

00

02

90

158

4

00

03

40

158

3

00

02

10

158

2इी

00

00

40

162

2सी2

00

00

60

162

2बी2

00

05

30

162

2ए2

00

04

65

162

2ए1

00

05

30

162

1एफ

00

02

90

162

1ई

00

00

95

162

1इी

00

00

60

171

1

00

16

95

174

00

17

60

175

01

24

00

क(लकरै

42 कलरी

392

9

00

15

75

392

10

00

01

10

392

8

00

09

80

392

1बी3

00

07

20

375

5बी

00

13

45

375

5ए

00

06

80

375

2

00

06

70

374

5

00

06

80

374

3

00

12

60

374

2बी

00

09

35

374

1सी

00

04

20

376

1ए

00

00

60

377

7ई

00

01

10

377

7इी

00

01

60

377

7सी

00

01

40

377

7बी

00

01

85

377

6बी

00

07

70

377

6ए

00

09

45

373

5बी

00

01

00

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3879

373

5ए

00

00

60

377

1

00

06

50

350

1

00

04

60

350

2

00

13

60

350

3

00

01

05

349

4ए

00

04

50

349

7

00

04

00

349

6

00

04

30

349

5

00

08

50

349

9

00

10

50

345

1

00

01

05

346

7

00

09

00

346

6बी

00

04

10

346

6ए

00

05

00

346

5

00

09

30

346

4

00

19

20

341

4

00

10

65

341

2

00

07

10

341

3बी

00

05

90

341

3ए

00

13

20

340

9

00

03

90

331

1

00

08

50

292

4

00

08

20

292

3

00

08

20

292

2

00

08

90

287

1

00

03

50

288

2

00

13

20

288

1

00

13

90

290

2ए

00

06

10

290

1

00

20

00

277

2बी

00

15

80

278

4

00

11

65

278

1

00

19

20

266

2बी

00

05

10

266

2सी

00

12

30

3880

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

266

3

00

13

00

266

4

00

12

25

264

1

00

03

20

262

5

00

22

10

262

6ए

00

02

20

261

11सी

00

00

45

क(लकरै

41 कुलपदम

99

1

00

00

80

100

1

00

16

00

98

2सी2

00

00

80

98

7

00

08

85

98

9

00

05

55

98

8

00

06

50

97

2बी

00

04

20

97

2ए

00

06

40

97

1

00

05

70

2

7

00

01

30

2

6

00

04

50

2

8ए

00

02

40

2

8बी

00

04

00

3

3ए

00

07

20

3

3बी

00

08

30

3

8

00

19

20

4

5

00

00

80

4

4

00

16

80

16

3

00

05

50

17

3ए

00

12

20

17

3बी

00

01

00

17

2

00

14

40

17

1

00

02

70

18

1

00

07

60

19

7

00

06

00

19

10

00

09

60

21

3ए

00

07

25

21

2

00

00

80

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3881

21

3बी

00

04

20

21

4बी

00

06

75

21

7

00

06

95

24

3

00

00

80

24

1बी

00

10

10

24

2

00

01

50

30

2

00

05

75

30

5बी

00

02

00

30

4

00

00

80

30

5सी

00

02

20

30

5ई

00

03

20

30

7

00

01

00

30

6

00

07

80

29

1

00

11

10

33

4ए

00

05

10

33

4बी

00

12

80

33

5

00

10

80

33

2

00

03

20

34

2ए2

00

14

10

34

2बी

00

07

30

37

5

00

15

15

37

4

00

00

95

36

3सी

00

00

80

36

2बी

00

07

80

36

2ए

00

09

20

36

1ए

00

13

00

36

1बी

00

15

75

40

4ए

00

09

55

40

3ए

00

05

40

39

00

06

30

40

2

00

06

10

40

1

00

20

20

45

1ए

00

07

10

क(लकरै

33 वेलनूर

90

1

00

04

55

90

2

00

05

25

3882

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

90

3

00

03

35

90

4

00

04

85

89

1

00

06

05

89

4

00

08

25

89

5

00

05

45

91

1

00

24

20

87

1ई1

00

10

25

87

2ए

00

12

90

87

2बी

00

11

25

87

2इी

00

07

95

86

2

00

03

30

86

3इी

00

04

30

84

00

16

45

83

3

00

13

15

83

4

00

11

90

85

1

00

02

10

85

2

00

00

40

81

2

00

42

45

110

2

00

28

20

110

1

00

08

00

111

1

00

13

20

111

4

00

00

40

111

3

00

06

40

76

1

00

05

45

76

2

00

29

55

76

3

00

14

35

118

1ए

00

10

35

119

2

00

00

60

119

3

00

10

80

120

1

00

15

60

120

3

00

21

80

120

2

00

06

80

121

1

00

14

10

121

2

00

14

50

122

2

00

17

30

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3883

122

3

00

08

65

122

4

00

08

85

124

1

00

07

70

124

2ए

00

01

60

124

3

00

00

40

123

2

00

00

50

123

3ए

00

06

40

123

3बी

00

05

00

123

3सी

00

02

40

123

4ए

00

01

85

123

4बी

00

04

75

123

4सी

00

04

65

126

1

00

24

45

127

2ए

00

05

90

127

3

00

08

15

129

1ए

00

07

00

129

1बी

00

02

50

129

2बी

00

05

00

129

2सी

00

02

00

129

3ए

00

00

70

129

3बी

00

00

40

128

1बी

00

12

30

128

3

00

06

80

128

4सी

00

01

10

134

3

00

02

05

134

2

00

04

40

134

4

00

06

90

134

9

00

04

50

134

8

00

00

40

134

7ए

00

01

30

134

7बी

00

07

75

135

1सी

00

10

25

135

2बी

00

04

65

155

7ए

00

00

45

156

2इी

00

06

40

3884

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

156

2सी

00

00

90

156

3

00

10

70

156

6

00

11

85

156

7ए

00

04

00

156

7बी

00

03

80

156

7सी

00

03

90

157

1ए

00

03

00

157

1बी

00

03

10

157

2

00

06

25

157

4ए

00

01

50

157

5

00

04

20

157

6

00

02

60

157

7

00

04

10

157

8/बी

00

04

00

157

8/ए

00

00

40

157

8/सी

00

05

30

164

2ए

00

01

20

164

2बी

00

04

90

164

7

00

10

80

164

8ए

00

00

70

164

6

00

21

80

163

4

00

03

00

165

5

00

00

40

165

6/बी

00

00

85

165

7/बी

00

01

60

165

8

00

11

10

166

2ए

00

00

40

166

1ए

00

08

40

166

1बी

00

04

75

166

3ए

00

00

40

220

1ए

00

04

40

221

9बी

00

05

30

221

2

00

05

00

221

5

00

07

10

221

7

00

02

80

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3885

222

10बी

00

01

40

222

10ए

00

13

85

222

9

00

12

65

222

8

00

04

45

222

6बी

00

00

40

238

1ए

00

08

30

238

1बी

00

01

50

224

1ए1

00

22

25

226

1ए

00

06

60

226

1बी

00

06

45

226

2ए

00

05

80

226

3ए

00

02

80

229

2ए

00

16

90

क(लकरै

32 पनैयिडये दल

34

3

00

07

90

34

4

00

04

50

35

2

00

04

65

35

3ई

00

09

10

43

1

00

11

20

43

2इी

00

00

40

43

2सी

00

04

85

43

2बी

00

08

45

43

2ए

00

05

70

43

2एच

00

02

25

45

00

11

95

46

1बी

00

00

40

46

1सी

00

02

80

46

2ई

00

06

25

46

3

00

07

20

49

1ए

00

03

10

49

1बी

00

03

20

49

1सी

00

03

20

49

1इी

00

04

40

49

1ई

00

04

70

49

1एफ

00

03

80

49

1जी

00

01

50

3886

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

47

1ए6

00

04

10

49

1एच

00

00

40

47

1बी2

00

05

10

47

1बी3ए

00

04

50

47

1बी3बी

00

04

90

47

12

00

01

15

47

13

00

00

60

47

14

00

00

40

47

2सी

00

00

40

47

11

00

12

00

47

2इी

00

01

80

47

2ई

00

01

40

56

7ए

00

03

10

56

7बी

00

01

95

56

7सी

00

02

20

56

7इी

00

02

00

56

6ए

00

08

10

56

4ए

00

02

40

56

4बी

00

04

20

56

4सी

00

00

40

56

4इी

00

05

05

55

1

00

09

90

57

5

00

00

40

57

6

00

00

70

57

7

00

01

70

57

10सी

00

02

60

57

10बी

00

05

40

58

4

00

09

30

58

3बी

00

07

60

165

6

00

03

30

165

5

00

05

90

165

1सी

00

00

40

165

7

00

00

50

165

4बी

00

12

00

165

4ए

00

00

40

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3887

155

8

00

09

10

155

9

00

08

50

155

10बी

00

04

95

155

10सी

00

01

90

154

12

00

06

90

157

1

00

02

50

157

2

00

04

80

154

13

00

02

10

157

3

00

08

00

153

15

00

11

50

153

16बी

00

11

40

141

7ए

00

08

30

141

5

00

03

20

141

8ए

00

00

40

141

6बी

00

10

40

140

1

00

00

40

139

2

00

04

70

139

3सी

00

04

95

139

9

00

00

40

139

8

00

09

70

139

7

00

05

00

138

2बी

00

00

95

138

2ए

00

03

55

138

6ए

00

02

30

138

6बी

00

02

25

138

8ए

00

02

40

138

8बी

00

01

60

138

9

00

04

35

137

1ए

00

28

20

203

2

00

32

80

232

4

00

27

50

231

2बी

00

03

60

231

3ए

00

03

50

231

3बी

00

03

55

230

1

00

08

90

3888

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

230

2

00

08

95

230

3ए1

00

09

80

230

3ए2

00

12

95

230

3बी

00

11

80

230

3सी

00

15

95

220

1

00

11

65

220

2ए

00

03

55

220

2बी

00

03

10

220

3

00

05

25

220

4

00

05

20

220

7

00

14

20

220

8ए

00

05

10

220

9ए

00

04

90

220

10ए

00

04

85

कडलाड़ी

50 िसiल

259

5ई

00

00

80

260

1

00

15

40

260

2

00

06

15

258

4सी

00

09

35

261

00

32

40

248

2

00

00

40

248

5

00

02

60

248

6

00

05

40

248

10

00

05

40

248

8

00

15

40

248

9

00

01

20

247

4

00

04

50

247

3

00

04

50

247

2

00

04

70

247

1

00

05

00

50

1ए1

00

02

90

50

1ए2

00

09

00

49

2सी

00

06

85

49

2इी3

00

15

40

49

2इी5

00

00

40

49

2इी4

00

06

25

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3889

49

2इी2

00

00

40

51

1ए

00

18

00

52

1ए

00

17

20

52

1बी

00

00

40

कडलाड़ी

42 पिनवासल

300

2

00

26

65

300

7

00

04

00

300

3

00

07

20

300

4

00

10

45

299

6बी

00

00

80

294

1

00

12

25

294

2

00

00

50

293

5

00

01

70

293

4

00

13

30

295

6ए

00

04

20

295

6बी

00

14

70

295

5

00

00

40

295

1सी

00

11

50

296

3

00

07

20

296

4

00

00

40

296

6

00

03

00

296

5

00

10

50

289

8

00

00

40

289

7

00

03

00

289

1

00

12

00

289

2ए

00

00

80

282

10

00

08

30

284

3

00

06

00

284

2

00

06

00

284

1

00

00

40

284

4

00

08

30

284

5

00

02

30

283

8बी

00

11

50

283

7

00

01

30

283

6

00

10

80

283

5

00

03

25

3890

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

331

4

00

01

30

331

2

00

06

70

331

1

00

08

50

272

7

00

03

80

273

1

00

08

20

250

10

00

18

20

247

2ई

00

02

20

247

2एफ

00

04

85

247

2जी

00

04

20

247

2एच

00

07

60

247

2आई

00

00

65

247

2के

00

12

15

247

2एल

00

00

70

कडलाड़ी

41 पेयhकुलम

49

2

00

17

70

49

1

00

15

50

48

4ए

00

01

30

48

4बी

00

04

00

48

3सी

00

07

60

50

1ए

00

00

40

51

9

00

07

10

51

3सी

00

03

30

51

3बी

00

01

00

51

3ई

00

02

80

51

3इी2

00

01

80

51

3इी1

00

03

80

51

8ए

00

00

70

51

4बी

00

12

55

51

4ए

00

00

45

51

6ए

00

00

40

51

5ए

00

13

80

53

2सी

00

00

70

53

3ए

00

00

40

53

2इी

00

15

10

53

2ई

00

07

60

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3891

57

8

00

07

50

57

9ए

00

00

40

57

7ए

00

06

10

57

7बी

00

07

20

57

3इी

00

05

60

57

3सी

00

00

40

57

6बी2

00

00

40

57

6बी1

00

00

80

57

4

00

02

75

57

6ए

00

05

90

57

5ए

00

04

90

57

5बी

00

05

40

70

5ए

00

10

80

70

4बी

00

03

60

70

2

00

11

90

70

3ए

00

01

30

70

3बी

00

00

40

56

00

00

40

72

1बी

00

07

40

72

1ए

00

00

60

72

1सी

00

11

70

76

14

00

00

40

76

15

00

07

20

76

16

00

00

40

76

5एफ

00

02

15

76

5ई

00

00

75

76

5इी

00

00

40

76

3बी

00

02

20

76

3ए

00

06

75

76

2ए2

00

06

80

76

2ए1

00

01

85

76

2बी2

00

00

40

76

2बी1

00

00

55

77

4

00

09

40

77

5

00

02

20

3892

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

77

7ए

00

03

95

83

7सी

00

01

35

83

8

00

06

30

83

6ई

00

03

50

83

6एफ

00

05

00

83

6जी

00

01

35

84

8ए

00

07

40

84

7ए

00

04

85

84

1बी

00

01

35

84

1ए

00

10

75

88

10बी

00

02

90

88

10ए

00

03

45

88

11ए

00

03

85

88

9

00

04

30

88

5

00

03

80

88

4

00

04

35

88

2सी

00

00

40

88

2बी

00

00

40

88

2ए

00

00

40

88

3ए

00

03

65

90

6बी4

00

02

35

90

6बी3

00

02

10

90

6बी2

00

03

50

90

6बी1

00

03

05

90

6ए

00

00

80

89

7आई

00

02

70

89

7ई

00

12

00

89

6

00

15

00

89

4बी

00

00

50

89

4ए

00

02

35

89

5ए

00

00

90

93

2सी4

00

01

10

93

5बी

00

09

00

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3893

93

2बी4

00

01

40

93

2बी3

00

01

40

93

4

00

07

50

93

2बी2

00

02

65

93

3ए

00

04

90

94

4के

00

00

40

94

4एल

00

12

50

94

4एम

00

00

55

94

4जे

00

15

85

94

4ई

00

06

15

94

4बी

00

03

60

94

3बी

00

00

40

94

2

00

02

05

95

1

00

15

90

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/99/2017-ओआर-I/ई-8030]

पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018

S.O. 810.—Whereas, by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural

Gas number S.O.No.334(E) dated: 27.01.2017 issued under sub section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals

Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (herein after referred to as the said Act) the

Central Government declared its intention to acquire the Right of User in the Lands specified in the Schedule appended

to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of Natural Gas, a pipeline “Ennore-

Tiruvallur -Bengaluru -Pondicherry -Nagapattinam –Madurai- Tuticorin” should be laid in the State of Tamil Nadu by

Indian Oil Corporation Limited.

And whereas, copies of the said notifications were made available to the public from 09.02.2017.

And whereas, the Competent Authority in pursuance of sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act has

submitted his report to the Central Government;

And whereas, the Central Government, after considering the said report is satisfied that the Right of User in

the Land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification should be acquired;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby declares that the Right of User in the said Land specified in the Schedule appended to this

notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby directs that the Right of User in the said Land shall instead of vesting in the Central Government,

vest from the date of publication of this declaration, in the Indian Oil Corporation Limited free from all encumbrances.

Indian Oil Corporation Limited shall be exclusively liable for any compensation in terms of section 10 of the

P & M P Act, 1962 and no suit, claim or legal proceeding would lie against the Central Government on any matter

relating to pipeline.

3894

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

SCHEDULE

District : Ramanathapuram

State : Tamil Nadu

Name of the Taluk

Name of the Village

Survey No.

Sub

Division

No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Square

Meter

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Ramanathapuram

53. Valantharavai

202

4

00

01

80

202

5B

00

08

65

96

4A

00

14

75

96

5A

00

08

90

96

3

00

17

00

96

2

00

00

40

96

1

00

01

30

95

6D

00

00

40

95

6E

00

00

40

95

7

00

10

70

95

3

00

01

45

95

2

00

05

50

95

1

00

07

00

98

2

00

11

90

99

9

00

14

95

99

8

00

03

10

99

5

00

04

70

99

4

00

02

35

99

3

00

02

30

99

1

00

08

30

88

5C

00

03

95

88

4C

00

03

90

100

1

00

26

40

100

2A

00

01

40

101

5A

00

13

30

101

4B2

00

00

40

101

5B

00

15

60

101

5C

00

01

35

101

3

00

05

25

101

6A

00

13

50

102

2

00

08

80

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3895

102

3

00

17

60

102

4A

00

07

00

109

5B

00

12

10

109

5A2

00

08

45

109

5A1

00

06

10

110

9B

00

04

70

110

9A

00

04

80

114

2B1

00

11

50

114

2A1

00

05

20

114

2A2

00

00

40

114

1B2

00

10

30

115

3A

00

06

25

115

2

00

10

45

113

4

00

16

80

113

5A

00

02

85

112

3

00

11

50

112

2D

00

02

15

112

2C

00

02

70

112

2B

00

02

35

112

2A

00

02

30

112

1B

00

08

10

Ramanathapuram

52. Kuyavankudi

181

6C

00

09

90

181

6B2

00

08

95

182

1B

00

08

95

182

2

00

08

85

182

3

00

07

00

183

3

00

21

60

183

2

00

10

90

183

4B

00

10

50

184

1B2

00

19

00

184

1B1

00

04

10

185

3C

00

15

80

185

3B

00

18

25

189

1

00

06

35

189

2B

00

04

90

189

2A

00

03

50

190

1A1

00

07

95

3896

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

190

1A2

00

01

95

168

4C

00

05

70

167

1A

00

12

15

167

3B1

00

01

15

167

3B2A

00

09

40

167

3B2B

00

02

00

167

3A

00

06

75

166

1C

00

00

40

166

1B

00

09

70

166

2A2

00

05

15

166

2A1

00

00

80

166

3A

00

09

30

166

4

00

22

30

Ramanathapuram

46. Sakkarakottai

355

2

00

04

50

355

3

00

07

50

355

1A1

00

06

60

354

2

00

02

70

354

1

00

03

55

351

9

00

00

85

351

12

00

05

45

351

11C

00

05

45

351

11A

00

05

25

351

5

00

07

90

351

2A

00

06

50

351

3A

00

06

60

351

3B

00

05

30

361

1A

00

01

90

361

1B

00

10

65

361

2

00

00

40

361

1C

00

00

40

347

1

00

01

25

347

2A

00

23

20

347

2B

00

12

00

362

2

00

02

35

362

3B

00

06

75

362

4

00

07

20

363

1A

00

03

25

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3897

363

1B

00

03

30

363

2

00

07

70

363

3

00

06

45

537

3B

00

12

95

536

4

00

04

50

536

8A

00

16

40

536

8B1

00

00

40

536

6

00

07

40

536

7

00

00

65

535

3

00

14

50

534

1

00

12

30

534

3

00

06

50

526

3A

00

05

00

526

3B

00

04

20

526

2A

00

05

85

526

1B

00

00

40

527

1

00

01

50

527

2

00

02

30

527

4B

00

03

15

527

5

00

04

15

527

3A1

00

00

65

527

3A2

00

02

50

527

3B

00

03

20

527

3C

00

03

55

527

3D

00

03

50

528

3

00

08

20

528

4A

00

04

40

528

4B

00

04

30

528

5

00

08

35

528

6

00

08

55

528

7

00

08

00

528

8C

00

04

25

528

9-1

00

03

70

528

9-2

00

03

35

529

1

00

06

45

529

2

00

05

90

529

3

00

05

70

3898

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

529

4

00

05

55

529

5

00

06

55

502

1A

00

15

30

502

3A

00

20

35

504

1B1A1

00

28

65

504

2A1A

00

05

30

504

2A1B

00

05

00

504

2B

00

05

15

504

3A

00

05

30

504

3B

00

04

10

504

4

00

06

90

506

1

00

05

70

506

2

00

03

80

506

3

00

03

95

506

4A4

00

03

85

506

4C

00

03

75

506

4B

00

03

20

506

4D

00

03

70

506

4E

00

01

60

500

1

00

02

00

499

1A

00

08

80

499

2

00

11

35

499

3A

00

11

10

Kilakarai

47. Kudhakkottai

19

6

00

01

70

19

5

00

09

60

19

4

00

00

80

20

1C

00

04

55

20

1D

00

02

80

20

1J

00

00

60

20

1I

00

02

80

20

1H

00

00

85

20

1K

00

03

70

20

1O

00

03

30

20

1N

00

00

95

20

1R

00

01

15

20

1S

00

02

45

20

1U

00

02

70

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3899

20

1Z

00

01

65

20

1V

00

00

90

20

1Y

00

00

60

20

1X

00

01

70

20

1W

00

00

80

20

2A

00

01

30

21

1A

00

02

10

21

1B

00

11

40

21

1E

00

00

60

21

1D

00

01

65

21

1C

00

05

80

25

1

00

00

85

26

1A1

00

06

80

26

1B

00

02

70

26

1C

00

03

20

26

2A

00

03

60

26

2B

00

02

70

27

2A4

00

04

35

27

2B

00

05

45

27

2C

00

06

45

27

4A

00

13

60

28

6B

00

15

10

28

6A

00

19

40

30

8C

00

00

90

38

3A

00

12

10

38

4A

00

08

00

38

4C1

00

10

10

39

2

00

15

30

39

3G

00

04

10

39

3I

00

04

45

39

3J

00

08

40

39

3L

00

01

65

39

5

00

03

00

42

5

00

00

60

43

7A

00

02

00

43

1A

00

07

10

43

2

00

06

00

3900

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

43

3A

00

01

25

151

1D

00

06

80

151

2A3

00

03

65

151

1C

00

01

90

151

2A2

00

00

60

151

2C

00

00

60

151

2D2

00

02

70

151

2E2

00

02

25

151

3A2

00

04

50

151

5

00

02

55

151

3B1

00

01

45

151

4A2

00

00

60

151

4A1

00

00

60

152

2B2

00

00

80

152

2B1

00

01

10

153

1G

00

00

65

153

1D

00

02

80

153

1E

00

03

00

153

1F

00

03

25

153

2A

00

08

45

153

3B

00

09

00

153

4

00

10

10

153

5D

00

03

40

153

5C

00

03

00

153

5K1

00

04

80

153

5K2

00

01

10

155

11

00

01

90

155

14A

00

00

40

155

15A

00

00

60

155

13A

00

02

30

155

4B2

00

00

80

155

4D

00

04

30

156

1A

00

05

50

156

1B

00

07

90

Kilakarai

46. Tiruppullani

67

2

00

00

75

67

1A

00

07

20

67

1B

00

01

90

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3901

66

5A

00

04

75

66

5B

00

01

90

65

8D

00

00

70

65

9G2

00

05

00

65

9H

00

00

40

65

9F

00

00

70

65

9E

00

05

45

65

10

00

00

60

65

9D

00

00

90

65

9C

00

07

20

65

9B

00

03

30

69

3A3

00

10

20

69

1B

00

02

45

69

1C

00

06

70

69

2

00

18

40

62

4B

00

00

60

70

1

00

08

50

70

2

00

01

10

59

4

00

11

00

59

5A

00

03

55

59

5B

00

04

40

59

6

00

10

75

59

7A

00

04

30

59

7B

00

02

80

59

3

00

01

95

58

5

00

00

60

58

2B

00

05

20

58

2C

00

00

60

58

2A

00

03

60

58

3A

00

01

50

58

1

00

11

90

48

00

02

00

50

12

00

17

85

52

6

00

02

80

52

5

00

14

00

52

7

00

00

60

52

3

00

00

60

3902

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

53

1B

00

02

55

53

2

00

01

45

53

3

00

05

00

53

4

00

14

00

53

5A

00

03

00

53

5B

00

03

20

53

6

00

02

95

42

1A

00

08

30

42

1B

00

07

85

42

2B

00

01

50

42

2C

00

01

45

42

3A

00

02

60

42

4

00

03

20

42

5

00

02

80

42

6

00

02

70

42

7

00

01

90

42

8A

00

00

60

43

4J1

00

06

30

43

4J2

00

00

60

43

4I2

00

06

20

43

4H2

00

02

90

41

00

09

80

78

00

18

40

79

00

01

60

124

1A2

00

11

60

124

1A1

00

07

10

128

2

00

23

75

137

9

00

03

05

137

13

00

10

35

137

14

00

07

95

136

2A2

00

03

55

136

2B

00

08

90

137

15

00

08

65

137

16

00

09

55

136

1G

00

00

85

135

3

00

07

60

135

2

00

10

00

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3903

135

1

00

07

40

149

2F

00

00

60

149

2G

00

03

10

149

2H

00

05

10

149

2I

00

03

75

149

3A

00

02

60

149

1F

00

09

00

149

1C

00

02

80

149

1D

00

07

20

157

5

00

18

55

158

11

00

00

60

158

9C

00

07

00

158

8

00

08

40

158

7

00

09

20

158

6B

00

09

40

158

5

00

02

90

158

4

00

03

40

158

3

00

02

10

158

2D

00

00

40

162

2C2

00

00

60

162

2B2

00

05

30

162

2A2

00

04

65

162

2A1

00

05

30

162

1F

00

02

90

162

1E

00

00

95

162

1D

00

00

60

171

1

00

16

95

174

00

17

60

175

01

24

00

Kilakarai

42. Kalari

392

9

00

15

75

392

10

00

01

10

392

8

00

09

80

392

1B3

00

07

20

375

5B

00

13

45

375

5A

00

06

80

375

2

00

06

70

374

5

00

06

80

3904

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

374

3

00

12

60

374

2B

00

09

35

374

1C

00

04

20

376

1A

00

00

60

377

7E

00

01

10

377

7D

00

01

60

377

7C

00

01

40

377

7B

00

01

85

377

6B

00

07

70

377

6A

00

09

45

373

5B

00

01

00

373

5A

00

00

60

377

1

00

06

50

350

1

00

04

60

350

2

00

13

60

350

3

00

01

05

349

4A

00

04

50

349

7

00

04

00

349

6

00

04

30

349

5

00

08

50

349

9

00

10

50

345

1

00

01

05

346

7

00

09

00

346

6B

00

04

10

346

6A

00

05

00

346

5

00

09

30

346

4

00

19

20

341

4

00

10

65

341

2

00

07

10

341

3B

00

05

90

341

3A

00

13

20

340

9

00

03

90

331

1

00

08

50

292

4

00

08

20

292

3

00

08

20

292

2

00

08

90

287

1

00

03

50

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3905

288

2

00

13

20

288

1

00

13

90

290

2A

00

06

10

290

1

00

20

00

277

2B

00

15

80

278

4

00

11

65

278

1

00

19

20

266

2B

00

05

10

266

2C

00

12

30

266

3

00

13

00

266

4

00

12

25

264

1

00

03

20

262

5

00

22

10

262

6A

00

02

20

261

11C

00

00

45

Kilakarai

41. Kulapatham

99

1

00

00

80

100

1

00

16

00

98

2C2

00

00

80

98

7

00

08

85

98

9

00

05

55

98

8

00

06

50

97

2B

00

04

20

97

2A

00

06

40

97

1

00

05

70

2

7

00

01

30

2

6

00

04

50

2

8A

00

02

40

2

8B

00

04

00

3

3A

00

07

20

3

3B

00

08

30

3

8

00

19

20

4

5

00

00

80

4

4

00

16

80

16

3

00

05

50

17

3A

00

12

20

17

3B

00

01

00

17

2

00

14

40

3906

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

17

1

00

02

70

18

1

00

07

60

19

7

00

06

00

19

10

00

09

60

21

3A

00

07

25

21

2

00

00

80

21

3B

00

04

20

21

4B

00

06

75

21

7

00

06

95

24

3

00

00

80

24

1B

00

10

10

24

2

00

01

50

30

2

00

05

75

30

5B

00

02

00

30

4

00

00

80

30

5C

00

02

20

30

5E

00

03

20

30

7

00

01

00

30

6

00

07

80

29

1

00

11

10

33

4A

00

05

10

33

4B

00

12

80

33

5

00

10

80

33

2

00

03

20

34

2A2

00

14

10

34

2B

00

07

30

37

5

00

15

15

37

4

00

00

95

36

3C

00

00

80

36

2B

00

07

80

36

2A

00

09

20

36

1A

00

13

00

36

1B

00

15

75

40

4A

00

09

55

40

3A

00

05

40

39

00

06

30

40

2

00

06

10

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3907

40

1

00

20

20

45

1A

00

07

10

Kilakarai

33. Velanur

90

1

00

04

55

90

2

00

05

25

90

3

00

03

35

90

4

00

04

85

89

1

00

06

05

89

4

00

08

25

89

5

00

05

45

91

1

00

24

20

87

1E1

00

10

25

87

2A

00

12

90

87

2B

00

11

25

87

2D

00

07

95

86

2

00

03

30

86

3D

00

04

30

84

00

16

45

83

3

00

13

15

83

4

00

11

90

85

1

00

02

10

85

2

00

00

40

81

2

00

42

45

110

2

00

28

20

110

1

00

08

00

111

1

00

13

20

111

4

00

00

40

111

3

00

06

40

76

1

00

05

45

76

2

00

29

55

76

3

00

14

35

118

1A

00

10

35

119

2

00

00

60

119

3

00

10

80

120

1

00

15

60

120

3

00

21

80

120

2

00

06

80

121

1

00

14

10

3908

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

121

2

00

14

50

122

2

00

17

30

122

3

00

08

65

122

4

00

08

85

124

1

00

07

70

124

2A

00

01

60

124

3

00

00

40

123

2

00

00

50

123

3A

00

06

40

123

3B

00

05

00

123

3C

00

02

40

123

4A

00

01

85

123

4B

00

04

75

123

4C

00

04

65

126

1

00

24

45

127

2A

00

05

90

127

3

00

08

15

129

1A

00

07

00

129

1B

00

02

50

129

2B

00

05

00

129

2C

00

02

00

129

3A

00

00

70

129

3B

00

00

40

128

1B

00

12

30

128

3

00

06

80

128

4C

00

01

10

134

3

00

02

05

134

2

00

04

40

134

4

00

06

90

134

9

00

04

50

134

8

00

00

40

134

7A

00

01

30

134

7B

00

07

75

135

1C

00

10

25

135

2B

00

04

65

155

7A

00

00

45

156

2D

00

06

40

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3909

156

2C

00

00

90

156

3

00

10

70

156

6

00

11

85

156

7A

00

04

00

156

7B

00

03

80

156

7C

00

03

90

157

1A

00

03

00

157

1B

00

03

10

157

2

00

06

25

157

4A

00

01

50

157

5

00

04

20

157

6

00

02

60

157

7

00

04

10

157

8/B

00

04

00

157

8/A

00

00

40

157

8/C

00

05

30

164

2A

00

01

20

164

2B

00

04

90

164

7

00

10

80

164

8A

00

00

70

164

6

00

21

80

163

4

00

03

00

165

5

00

00

40

165

6/B

00

00

85

165

7/B

00

01

60

165

8

00

11

10

166

2A

00

00

40

166

1A

00

08

40

166

1B

00

04

75

166

3A

00

00

40

220

1A

00

04

40

221

9B

00

05

30

221

2

00

05

00

221

5

00

07

10

221

7

00

02

80

222

10B

00

01

40

222

10A

00

13

85

3910

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

222

9

00

12

65

222

8

00

04

45

222

6B

00

00

40

238

1A

00

08

30

238

1B

00

01

50

224

1A1

00

22

25

226

1A

00

06

60

226

1B

00

06

45

226

2A

00

05

80

226

3A

00

02

80

229

2A

00

16

90

Kilakarai

32. Panaiyadiyendal

34

3

00

07

90

34

4

00

04

50

35

2

00

04

65

35

3E

00

09

10

43

1

00

11

20

43

2D

00

00

40

43

2C

00

04

85

43

2B

00

08

45

43

2A

00

05

70

43

2H

00

02

25

45

00

11

95

46

1B

00

00

40

46

1C

00

02

80

46

2E

00

06

25

46

3

00

07

20

49

1A

00

03

10

49

1B

00

03

20

49

1C

00

03

20

49

1D

00

04

40

49

1E

00

04

70

49

1F

00

03

80

49

1G

00

01

50

47

1A6

00

04

10

49

1H

00

00

40

47

1B2

00

05

10

47

1B3A

00

04

50

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3911

47

1B3B

00

04

90

47

12

00

01

15

47

13

00

00

60

47

14

00

00

40

47

2C

00

00

40

47

11

00

12

00

47

2D

00

01

80

47

2E

00

01

40

56

7A

00

03

10

56

7B

00

01

95

56

7C

00

02

20

56

7D

00

02

00

56

6A

00

08

10

56

4A

00

02

40

56

4B

00

04

20

56

4C

00

00

40

56

4D

00

05

05

55

1

00

09

90

57

5

00

00

40

57

6

00

00

70

57

7

00

01

70

57

10C

00

02

60

57

10B

00

05

40

58

4

00

09

30

58

3B

00

07

60

165

6

00

03

30

165

5

00

05

90

165

1C

00

00

40

165

7

00

00

50

165

4B

00

12

00

165

4A

00

00

40

155

8

00

09

10

155

9

00

08

50

155

10B

00

04

95

155

10C

00

01

90

154

12

00

06

90

157

1

00

02

50

3912

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

157

2

00

04

80

154

13

00

02

10

157

3

00

08

00

153

15

00

11

50

153

16B

00

11

40

141

7A

00

08

30

141

5

00

03

20

141

8A

00

00

40

141

6B

00

10

40

140

1

00

00

40

139

2

00

04

70

139

3C

00

04

95

139

9

00

00

40

139

8

00

09

70

139

7

00

05

00

138

2B

00

00

95

138

2A

00

03

55

138

6A

00

02

30

138

6B

00

02

25

138

8A

00

02

40

138

8B

00

01

60

138

9

00

04

35

137

1A

00

28

20

203

2

00

32

80

232

4

00

27

50

231

2B

00

03

60

231

3A

00

03

50

231

3B

00

03

55

230

1

00

08

90

230

2

00

08

95

230

3A1

00

09

80

230

3A2

00

12

95

230

3B

00

11

80

230

3C

00

15

95

220

1

00

11

65

220

2A

00

03

55

220

2B

00

03

10

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3913

220

3

00

05

25

220

4

00

05

20

220

7

00

14

20

220

8A

00

05

10

220

9A

00

04

90

220

10A

00

04

85

Kadaladi

50. Sikkal

259

5E

00

00

80

260

1

00

15

40

260

2

00

06

15

258

4C

00

09

35

261

00

32

40

248

2

00

00

40

248

5

00

02

60

248

6

00

05

40

248

10

00

05

40

248

8

00

15

40

248

9

00

01

20

247

4

00

04

50

247

3

00

04

50

247

2

00

04

70

247

1

00

05

00

50

1A1

00

02

90

50

1A2

00

09

00

49

2C

00

06

85

49

2D3

00

15

40

49

2D5

00

00

40

49

2D4

00

06

25

49

2D2

00

00

40

51

1A

00

18

00

52

1A

00

17

20

52

1B

00

00

40

Kadaladi

42. Panivasal

300

2

00

26

65

300

7

00

04

00

300

3

00

07

20

300

4

00

10

45

299

6B

00

00

80

294

1

00

12

25

3914

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

294

2

00

00

50

293

5

00

01

70

293

4

00

13

30

295

6A

00

04

20

295

6B

00

14

70

295

5

00

00

40

295

1C

00

11

50

296

3

00

07

20

296

4

00

00

40

296

6

00

03

00

296

5

00

10

50

289

8

00

00

40

289

7

00

03

00

289

1

00

12

00

289

2A

00

00

80

282

10

00

08

30

284

3

00

06

00

284

2

00

06

00

284

1

00

00

40

284

4

00

08

30

284

5

00

02

30

283

8B

00

11

50

283

7

00

01

30

283

6

00

10

80

283

5

00

03

25

331

4

00

01

30

331

2

00

06

70

331

1

00

08

50

272

7

00

03

80

273

1

00

08

20

250

10

00

18

20

247

2E

00

02

20

247

2F

00

04

85

247

2G

00

04

20

247

2H

00

07

60

247

2I

00

00

65

247

2K

00

12

15

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3915

247

2L

00

00

70

Kadaladi

41. Peykkulam

49

2

00

17

70

49

1

00

15

50

48

4A

00

01

30

48

4B

00

04

00

48

3C

00

07

60

50

1A

00

00

40

51

9

00

07

10

51

3C

00

03

30

51

3B

00

01

00

51

3E

00

02

80

51

3D2

00

01

80

51

3D1

00

03

80

51

8A

00

00

70

51

4B

00

12

55

51

4A

00

00

45

51

6A

00

00

40

51

5A

00

13

80

53

2C

00

00

70

53

3A

00

00

40

53

2D

00

15

10

53

2E

00

07

60

57

8

00

07

50

57

9A

00

00

40

57

7A

00

06

10

57

7B

00

07

20

57

3D

00

05

60

57

3C

00

00

40

57

6B2

00

00

40

57

6B1

00

00

80

57

4

00

02

75

57

6A

00

05

90

57

5A

00

04

90

57

5B

00

05

40

70

5A

00

10

80

70

4B

00

03

60

3916

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

70

2

00

11

90

70

3A

00

01

30

70

3B

00

00

40

56

00

00

40

72

1B

00

07

40

72

1A

00

00

60

72

1C

00

11

70

76

14

00

00

40

76

15

00

07

20

76

16

00

00

40

76

5F

00

02

15

76

5E

00

00

75

76

5D

00

00

40

76

3B

00

02

20

76

3A

00

06

75

76

2A2

00

06

80

76

2A1

00

01

85

76

2B2

00

00

40

76

2B1

00

00

55

77

4

00

09

40

77

5

00

02

20

77

7A

00

03

95

83

7C

00

01

35

83

8

00

06

30

83

6E

00

03

50

83

6F

00

05

00

83

6G

00

01

35

84

8A

00

07

40

84

7A

00

04

85

84

1B

00

01

35

84

1A

00

10

75

88

10B

00

02

90

88

10A

00

03

45

88

11A

00

03

85

88

9

00

04

30

88

5

00

03

80

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3917

88

4

00

04

35

88

2C

00

00

40

88

2B

00

00

40

88

2A

00

00

40

88

3A

00

03

65

90

6B4

00

02

35

90

6B3

00

02

10

90

6B2

00

03

50

90

6B1

00

03

05

90

6A

00

00

80

89

7I

00

02

70

89

7E

00

12

00

89

6

00

15

00

89

4B

00

00

50

89

4A

00

02

35

89

5A

00

00

90

93

2C4

00

01

10

93

5B

00

09

00

93

2B4

00

01

40

93

2B3

00

01

40

93

4

00

07

50

93

2B2

00

02

65

93

3A

00

04

90

94

4K

00

00

40

94

4L

00

12

50

94

4M

00

00

55

94

4J

00

15

85

94

4E

00

06

15

94

4B

00

03

60

94

3B

00

00

40

94

2

00

02

05

95

1

00

15

90

[F. No. R-11025(11)/99/2017-OR-I/E-8030]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

3918

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

नई दली, 15 मई, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 811

811

811

811.—के ीय सरकार ने पेोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूिम म उपयोग के अिधकार का अज न)

अिधिनयम,1962 (1962 का 50) (िजसे इसमे इसके पQात उ- अिधिनयम कहा गया है) क( धारा 3 क( उप धारा (1) के अधीन जारी

क( गई, भारत सरकार के पेोिलयम और *ाकृितक गैस मं4ालय क( अिधसूचना का.आ. 2025 तारीख 28.08.2017 िजसका *काशन

भारत के राजप4 सं7या 35, भाग -II, ख;ड 3, उप-ख;ड (ii) तारीख 02.09.2017 म कया गया है । इस अिधसूचना म संलZ अनुसूची म

िविन[द\ ओिड़शा राKय के तहसील : कुकुड़ा

कुकुड़ा

कुकुड़ा

कुकुड़ाखिड

खिड

खिड

खिड, िजला : गंजाम

गंजाम

गंजाम

गंजाम क( भूिम म, ओिड़शा राKय म पारादीप से तेलंगाना राKय म

हैदराबाद तक पेोिलयम उoपाद. के पLरवहन के िलये इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपUरेशन िलिमटेड के )ारा pयाि वत कए जा रहे "पारादीप-

हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन पLरयोजना” के संबंध म पाइपलाइन िबछाने के *योजन के िलये उपयोग के अिधकार का अज न करने के िलये अपने

आशय क( घोषणा क( थी;

और उ- राजप4 अिधसूचना क( *ितयाँ जनता को उपलWध करा दी गई थe। और उ- अिधिनयम क( धारा 6 क( उपधारा (1)

के अनुसरण म सYम *ािधकारी न के ीय सरकार को अपनी Lरपोट दे दी है;

और के ीय सरकार ने उ- Lरपोट पर िवचार करने के पQात और यह समाधान हो जाने पर क उ- भूिम पाइपलाइन

िबछाने के िलये अपेिYत है, उसम उपयोग के अिधकार का अज न करने का िविनq चय कया है;

अत: अब, के ीय सरकार उ- अिधिनयम क( धारा 6 क( उपधारा (1) )ारा *द+ शि-य. का *योग करते 0ए एतद्)ारा

घोषणा करती है क इस अिधसूचना से संलZ अनुसूिच म िविन[द\ भूिम म पाइपलाइन िबछाने के उपयोग का अिधकार अOजत कया

जाए; और के ीय सरकार उ- अिधिनयम क( धारा 6 क( उपधारा (4) )ारा *द+ शि-य. का *योग करते 0ए, यह िनद`श देती है क

उ- भूिम म उपयोग का अिधकार इस घोषणा के *काशन क( तारीख से के ीय सरकार म िनिहत होने के बजाए सभी िबलंगम. से

मु- होकर इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपUरेशन िलिमटेड म िनिहत होगा।

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

तहसील- कुकुड़ाखि;ड

िजला - गंजाम

राKय -ओिड़शा

गाँव का नाम

Eलॉट नं.

Yे4फल

हेhटयर

एयर

वग मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

बलरामपिल

8

00

00

29

11

00

00

10

37

00

01

97

36

00

03

88

44

00

04

07

27

00

00

10

31

00

01

38

53

00

03

12

60

00

01

95

57

00

02

00

58

00

03

67

91

00

02

59

90

00

01

21

92

00

01

62

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3919

95

00

01

13

100

00

02

09

101

00

01

17

106

00

01

12

भुड़rका

68

00

13

41

69

00

24

76

70

00

28

70

71

00

08

30

72

00

09

01

74

00

17

91

75

00

04

55

76

00

00

81

3226

00

00

10

3227

00

04

55

3228

00

03

21

3228/4167

00

03

74

3229

00

07

32

3245

00

00

10

3277

00

07

77

3278

00

13

74

3287

00

00

14

3287/4168

00

00

10

3280

00

07

82

3282

00

00

10

3286

00

02

39

3285/4113

00

00

84

3285/4114

00

01

60

3285

00

02

36

3298

00

00

15

3297

00

00

40

3297/4181

00

01

57

3296

00

05

87

3304

00

00

30

3305

00

02

79

3920

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

3306

00

07

74

3321

00

00

49

3331

00

00

18

3322

00

09

15

3112

00

07

32

3323

00

00

43

3098

00

06

82

3325

00

00

23

3097

00

04

61

3360

00

04

87

3094

00

00

34

3497

00

03

22

3509

00

07

46

3509/4126

00

05

74

3527

00

12

76

3529

00

00

98

3526

00

06

00

3544

00

00

80

3558

00

17

77

3559

00

03

78

3560

00

01

30

3579

00

01

16

3579/4239

00

01

20

3592

00

10

18

3591

00

04

83

3589

00

00

44

3586

00

17

29

बउलझोिल

843

00

00

10

846

00

00

10

917

00

01

52

926

00

02

21

922

00

00

45

925

00

01

46

927

00

01

64

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3921

928

00

02

05

973

00

03

03

974

00

00

10

973/2288

00

02

12

976

00

02

84

977/3152

00

03

41

977

00

00

27

978

00

03

01

978/3194

00

04

86

978/3195

00

04

03

980

00

00

78

1715

00

00

84

982

00

03

00

983

00

03

10

984

00

00

16

985

00

02

53

986

00

02

63

987

00

07

13

990

00

02

64

989

00

00

80

992

00

02

24

993

00

08

29

1000

00

00

11

999

00

06

83

1000/2275

00

00

56

1002

00

02

59

1001

00

02

50

1004

00

03

80

1004/3151

00

00

10

1312/2270

00

00

10

1313

00

06

38

1317

00

00

49

1316

00

06

14

2087

00

07

17

3922

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2088

00

08

26

2089

00

04

97

म0घरािहल

97

00

00

10

110

00

00

82

111

00

08

17

112

00

04

71

122

00

01

42

215

00

01

89

223

00

03

70

209

00

20

64

192

00

15

14

193

00

08

61

पादLरपली

303

00

04

10

325

00

02

18

324

00

03

96

323

00

04

83

309

00

00

64

322

00

06

74

315

00

00

18

321

00

04

30

316

00

00

68

317

00

01

04

319

00

01

20

318

00

04

16

362

00

01

08

383

00

02

08

384

00

00

10

382

00

06

01

380

00

02

64

381

00

00

13

376

00

08

15

386/653

00

01

54

395

00

02

67

390

00

03

43

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3923

391

00

02

52

393

00

03

16

392

00

02

52

394

00

01

43

437

00

05

27

438

00

02

46

439

00

08

99

434

00

09

82

लांिजआ

743

00

01

79

742

00

00

11

744

00

08

44

752

00

01

98

745

00

02

08

750

00

00

95

749

00

03

76

751

00

04

80

757

00

03

11

748

00

00

32

758

00

06

24

769

00

00

80

806

00

01

97

805

00

02

46

804

00

01

02

803

00

00

10

770

00

00

10

802

00

03

88

801

00

03

19

828

00

01

56

828/1730

00

01

49

800

00

03

74

799

00

00

23

829

00

01

31

830

00

02

32

831

00

02

46

3924

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

866

00

04

41

834

00

00

12

865

00

03

60

867

00

02

04

868

00

03

36

864

00

00

47

869

00

00

19

883

00

05

58

871

00

03

03

882

00

00

26

877

00

05

16

879

00

05

24

878

00

04

74

1029

00

01

75

1030

00

02

25

1028

00

00

10

1022

00

02

87

1023

00

00

10

1031

00

00

32

1020

00

00

66

1021

00

00

79

1034

00

01

03

1041

00

02

12

1040

00

02

29

1039

00

01

15

1038

00

04

19

1044

00

00

21

1137

00

03

68

1138

00

00

10

1134

00

03

09

1136

00

01

10

1135

00

01

48

1133

00

01

27

1132

00

05

42

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3925

1126

00

01

87

1131

00

01

28

1130

00

02

40

1129

00

01

86

1128

00

01

69

1207

00

01

63

1209

00

02

44

1206

00

03

10

1211

00

02

64

1212

00

01

39

1213

00

01

60

1214

00

04

07

1215

00

06

80

1216

00

04

60

1224

00

01

78

1225

00

03

42

1223

00

01

82

1369

00

06

80

1369/1436

00

02

09

1370

00

04

27

1351

00

02

59

1349

00

02

68

1344

00

10

60

1322

00

02

59

1323

00

04

31

1324

00

02

22

1325

00

01

79

1326

00

03

22

1327

00

01

15

1328

00

00

55

1318

00

01

31

1313

00

01

20

1314

00

01

15

1308

00

00

95

3926

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1310

00

00

10

1306

00

01

07

1309

00

00

17

1298

00

00

49

1305

00

01

02

1304

00

01

71

1299

00

00

73

1300

00

00

77

1301

00

00

54

1302

00

02

73

1296

00

01

25

1295

00

01

46

1294

00

01

34

1293

00

01

41

भगबानपुर

563

00

04

94

538

00

04

05

539

00

09

28

540

00

01

04

537

00

00

25

519

00

11

03

535/808

00

06

15

572

00

02

53

573

00

05

60

533

00

01

80

574/860

00

03

24

574/859

00

02

82

574/1179

00

01

54

574

00

01

29

576

00

08

40

576/895

00

01

17

577

00

19

81

578

00

02

40

579

00

02

22

579/1185

00

00

94

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3927

580

00

06

20

582

00

05

88

583

00

11

63

586

00

16

32

588

00

03

97

616

00

10

81

615

00

10

31

618

00

11

39

620

00

08

66

649

00

08

91

668

00

02

26

669

00

00

56

662

00

00

53

663

00

01

06

661

00

03

15

372

00

02

40

371

00

05

96

367

00

00

67

297

00

02

21

298

00

06

16

299/791

00

00

60

`

208

00

01

24

209

00

07

76

205

00

00

94

206

00

07

54

207

00

05

58

202

00

05

82

201

00

04

66

201/970

00

00

10

200

00

02

60

692

00

02

61

198

00

01

16

197

00

02

00

196

00

07

35

3928

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

187

00

00

70

728

00

00

28

728/790

00

05

84

727

00

01

24

729

00

12

72

190

00

00

10

730

00

02

20

748

00

08

05

750

00

04

50

751/890

00

05

41

755

00

06

71

756

00

05

43

754/778

00

00

44

756/888

00

05

87

756/887

00

02

70

759/772

00

05

80

760

00

14

00

759

00

05

09

761

00

01

95

762/845

00

06

85

762/846

00

04

36

763

00

00

72

अन ताइ

1365

00

03

14

1366

00

04

64

1367

00

02

00

1367/2328

00

05

15

1367/2330

00

05

15

1476

00

04

03

1433

00

08

65

1438

00

03

62

1438/2193

00

02

50

1437

00

01

36

1435/2175

00

00

51

1435

00

00

51

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3929

1449

00

08

06

1450

00

08

96

1458

00

07

25

1456

00

00

37

1457

00

00

50

1455

00

02

75

1453

00

00

58

1454

00

02

90

1466

00

04

61

1591

00

00

17

1590

00

09

45

1599

00

00

10

1589

00

00

10

1606

00

06

08

1584

00

12

45

1583

00

00

10

1582

00

03

63

1610

00

01

42

1579

00

03

46

1580

00

00

55

1580/1796

00

02

13

1578

00

02

22

1613

00

00

56

1577

00

04

56

1576

00

01

69

1575

00

00

77

1544

00

00

10

1545

00

06

54

1546

00

04

11

1547

00

00

10

1548

00

02

17

1571

00

03

90

1571/2187

00

01

55

1560

00

04

02

3930

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1560/2157

00

02

64

1552

00

01

26

1553

00

06

67

1554

00

04

45

1557

00

00

36

1555

00

02

56

781

00

05

32

736

00

00

70

739

00

06

89

740

00

04

08

741

00

01

30

743

00

09

01

744

00

04

08

745

00

02

30

754

00

07

84

ब थपिल

1154

00

00

63

1159

00

04

38

1153/2538

00

01

18

1161

00

02

23

1161/3007

00

06

68

1166

00

06

20

1164

00

01

00

1165

00

05

17

1145

00

02

97

1146

00

02

68

1147

00

00

10

1147/2762

00

00

10

1144

00

09

27

1135

00

06

34

1135/1953

00

01

05

1139

00

02

73

1139/2552

00

02

73

1140

00

01

50

1180

00

05

20

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3931

1138

00

00

10

1138/2121

00

00

10

1181

00

01

50

1215

00

01

54

1210

00

01

66

1210/2511

00

00

53

1210/2884

00

00

10

1210/2885

00

02

66

1210/3006

00

03

09

1210/3009

00

03

09

1210/3016

00

02

97

1219

00

01

57

1224

00

07

64

1226

00

00

26

1227

00

00

20

1222

00

04

18

1703

00

08

65

1709

00

00

16

1701

00

00

10

1708

00

05

28

1705

00

00

20

1707

00

06

49

1757

00

03

39

1759

00

01

90

चकु;डाझोला

165

00

13

15

165/399

00

01

03

169

00

21

32

169/424

00

01

53

169/427

00

01

40

169/428

00

01

30

169/429

00

01

53

201/371

00

08

49

201/370

00

13

70

202

00

01

26

3932

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

202/366

00

00

30

202/368

00

02

84

207

00

11

29

211

00

01

71

211/337

00

04

87

209

00

16

86

कुसुिम

8/1124

00

10

79

8/1124/1346

00

09

50

8

00

00

23

105/1125

00

01

49

106

00

00

38

104

00

00

89

104/1295/1612

00

02

70

104/1369

00

01

65

104/1370

00

04

85

104/1653

00

03

59

104/1654

00

01

08

104/1295

00

13

69

1294

00

12

26

1292

00

15

80

86

00

00

10

85

00

05

19

84

00

01

06

80

00

00

70

81

00

01

78

83/1136

00

03

67

82

00

00

88

83

00

03

40

311

00

02

70

310

00

02

29

309

00

02

36

312

00

06

20

308

00

00

92

313

00

00

96

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3933

318

00

15

41

320

00

02

72

326

00

00

10

325

00

10

76

335

00

05

08

328

00

13

80

332

00

01

79

331

00

10

95

330

00

00

13

330/1642

00

00

10

342/966

00

02

21

343

00

15

38

343/1345

00

00

60

343/1371

00

00

85

343/1585

00

00

83

344

00

18

04

292

00

01

84

292/1457

00

02

23

292/1537

00

01

53

292/1547

00

00

76

292/1551

00

00

46

292/1548

00

01

40

292/1549

00

02

75

292/1623

00

01

68

291

00

00

11

291/1077

00

15

47

291/1613

00

00

65

291/1640

00

01

54

430

00

06

12

430/1376

00

03

05

430/1403

00

04

56

431

00

08

41

431/1377

00

02

96

448

00

04

45

3934

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/236/2017-ओआर-I/ई-13717]

पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव

447/1334

00

04

19

1071

00

04

73

446/1332

00

01

72

445

00

03

00

445/1602

00

03

49

445/1604

00

22

27

440

00

02

55

अजु नपुर

11

00

03

76

13

00

00

16

22

00

12

54

90

00

09

94

92

00

00

77

91

00

02

94

85

00

16

33

88

00

00

12

84

00

03

49

83

00

05

88

98

00

09

42

99

00

02

33

126

00

01

58

जुगुिड़

570

00

06

70

580

00

15

75

577

00

10

39

1835

00

16

54

1830

00

09

85

1831

00

01

73

1836

00

00

67

1838

00

15

85

1840

00

00

22

1841

00

06

47

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3935

New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018

S.O. 811.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural

Gas, published in the Gazette of India No. 35 Part-II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii) dated 02.09.2017 vide S.O. Number

2025 dated 28.08.2017 issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals pipelines (Acquisition

of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962),(hereinafter referred to as the said Act) the Central Government

declared its intension to acquire the right of user in the land situated in Tehsil-Kukudakhandi, District-Ganjam in

Odisha State, specified in the schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the

transportation of petroleum products from Paradip in the State of Odisha to Hyderabad in the State of Telengana by the

Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the “Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline Project”.

And whereas the copies of the Gazette were made available to the public. And whereas the Competent

Authority has under Sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, has submitted his report of Central Government;

And whereas, the Central Government after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said

land is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of the user therein;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the schedule appended to this notification is

hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby directs that the right of user of the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the

Central Government, vests on the date of publication of the declaration, in Indian Oil Corporation Limited, free from

all encumbrances.

SCHEDULE

Tehsil: KUKUDAKHANDI

District : GANJAM

State : ODISHA

Name of the Village

Plot No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

BALARAMPALLI

8

00

00

29

11

00

00

10

37

00

01

97

36

00

03

88

44

00

04

07

27

00

00

10

31

00

01

38

53

00

03

12

60

00

01

95

57

00

02

00

58

00

03

67

91

00

02

59

90

00

01

21

92

00

01

62

95

00

01

13

100

00

02

09

101

00

01

17

106

00

01

12

BHUDUKA

68

00

13

41

3936

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

69

00

24

76

70

00

28

70

71

00

08

30

72

00

09

01

74

00

17

91

75

00

04

55

76

00

00

81

3226

00

00

10

3227

00

04

55

3228

00

03

21

3228/4167

00

03

74

3229

00

07

32

3245

00

00

10

3277

00

07

77

3278

00

13

74

3287

00

00

14

3287/4168

00

00

10

3280

00

07

82

3282

00

00

10

3286

00

02

39

3285/4113

00

00

84

3285/4114

00

01

60

3285

00

02

36

3298

00

00

15

3297

00

00

40

3297/4181

00

01

57

3296

00

05

87

3304

00

00

30

3305

00

02

79

3306

00

07

74

3321

00

00

49

3331

00

00

18

3322

00

09

15

3112

00

07

32

3323

00

00

43

3098

00

06

82

3325

00

00

23

3097

00

04

61

3360

00

04

87

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3937

3094

00

00

34

3497

00

03

22

3509

00

07

46

3509/4126

00

05

74

3527

00

12

76

3529

00

00

98

3526

00

06

00

3544

00

00

80

3558

00

17

77

3559

00

03

78

3560

00

01

30

3579

00

01

16

3579/4239

00

01

20

3592

00

10

18

3591

00

04

83

3589

00

00

44

3586

00

17

29

BAULAJHOLI

843

00

00

10

846

00

00

10

917

00

01

52

926

00

02

21

922

00

00

45

925

00

01

46

927

00

01

64

928

00

02

05

973

00

03

03

974

00

00

10

973/2288

00

02

12

976

00

02

84

977/3152

00

03

41

977

00

00

27

978

00

03

01

978/3194

00

04

86

978/3195

00

04

03

980

00

00

78

1715

00

00

84

982

00

03

00

983

00

03

10

984

00

00

16

3938

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

985

00

02

53

986

00

02

63

987

00

07

13

990

00

02

64

989

00

00

80

992

00

02

24

993

00

08

29

1000

00

00

11

999

00

06

83

1000/2275

00

00

56

1002

00

02

59

1001

00

02

50

1004

00

03

80

1004/3151

00

00

10

1312/2270

00

00

10

1313

00

06

38

1317

00

00

49

1316

00

06

14

2087

00

07

17

2088

00

08

26

2089

00

04

97

MAHUGHARA HILL

97

00

00

10

110

00

00

82

111

00

08

17

112

00

04

71

122

00

01

42

215

00

01

89

223

00

03

70

209

00

20

64

192

00

15

14

193

00

08

61

PADIRIPALLI

303

00

04

10

325

00

02

18

324

00

03

96

323

00

04

83

309

00

00

64

322

00

06

74

315

00

00

18

321

00

04

30

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3939

316

00

00

68

317

00

01

04

319

00

01

20

318

00

04

16

362

00

01

08

383

00

02

08

384

00

00

10

382

00

06

01

380

00

02

64

381

00

00

13

376

00

08

15

386/653

00

01

54

395

00

02

67

390

00

03

43

391

00

02

52

393

00

03

16

392

00

02

52

394

00

01

43

437

00

05

27

438

00

02

46

439

00

08

99

434

00

09

82

LANJIA

743

00

01

79

742

00

00

11

744

00

08

44

752

00

01

98

745

00

02

08

750

00

00

95

749

00

03

76

751

00

04

80

757

00

03

11

748

00

00

32

758

00

06

24

769

00

00

80

806

00

01

97

805

00

02

46

804

00

01

02

803

00

00

10

770

00

00

10

3940

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

802

00

03

88

801

00

03

19

828

00

01

56

828/1730

00

01

49

800

00

03

74

799

00

00

23

829

00

01

31

830

00

02

32

831

00

02

46

866

00

04

41

834

00

00

12

865

00

03

60

867

00

02

04

868

00

03

36

864

00

00

47

869

00

00

19

883

00

05

58

871

00

03

03

882

00

00

26

877

00

05

16

879

00

05

24

878

00

04

74

1029

00

01

75

1030

00

02

25

1028

00

00

10

1022

00

02

87

1023

00

00

10

1031

00

00

32

1020

00

00

66

1021

00

00

79

1034

00

01

03

1041

00

02

12

1040

00

02

29

1039

00

01

15

1038

00

04

19

1044

00

00

21

1137

00

03

68

1138

00

00

10

1134

00

03

09

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3941

1136

00

01

10

1135

00

01

48

1133

00

01

27

1132

00

05

42

1126

00

01

87

1131

00

01

28

1130

00

02

40

1129

00

01

86

1128

00

01

69

1207

00

01

63

1209

00

02

44

1206

00

03

10

1211

00

02

64

1212

00

01

39

1213

00

01

60

1214

00

04

07

1215

00

06

80

1216

00

04

60

1224

00

01

78

1225

00

03

42

1223

00

01

82

1369

00

06

80

1369/1436

00

02

09

1370

00

04

27

1351

00

02

59

1349

00

02

68

1344

00

10

60

1322

00

02

59

1323

00

04

31

1324

00

02

22

1325

00

01

79

1326

00

03

22

1327

00

01

15

1328

00

00

55

1318

00

01

31

1313

00

01

20

1314

00

01

15

1308

00

00

95

1310

00

00

10

3942

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1306

00

01

07

1309

00

00

17

1298

00

00

49

1305

00

01

02

1304

00

01

71

1299

00

00

73

1300

00

00

77

1301

00

00

54

1302

00

02

73

1296

00

01

25

1295

00

01

46

1294

00

01

34

1293

00

01

41

BHAGABANPUR

563

00

04

94

538

00

04

05

539

00

09

28

540

00

01

04

537

00

00

25

519

00

11

03

535/808

00

06

15

572

00

02

53

573

00

05

60

533

00

01

80

574/860

00

03

24

574/859

00

02

82

574/1179

00

01

54

574

00

01

29

576

00

08

40

576/895

00

01

17

577

00

19

81

578

00

02

40

579

00

02

22

579/1185

00

00

94

580

00

06

20

582

00

05

88

583

00

11

63

586

00

16

32

588

00

03

97

616

00

10

81

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3943

615

00

10

31

618

00

11

39

620

00

08

66

649

00

08

91

668

00

02

26

669

00

00

56

662

00

00

53

663

00

01

06

661

00

03

15

372

00

02

40

371

00

05

96

367

00

00

67

297

00

02

21

298

00

06

16

299/791

00

00

60

`

208

00

01

24

209

00

07

76

205

00

00

94

206

00

07

54

207

00

05

58

202

00

05

82

201

00

04

66

201/970

00

00

10

200

00

02

60

692

00

02

61

198

00

01

16

197

00

02

00

196

00

07

35

187

00

00

70

728

00

00

28

728/790

00

05

84

727

00

01

24

729

00

12

72

190

00

00

10

730

00

02

20

748

00

08

05

750

00

04

50

751/890

00

05

41

755

00

06

71

3944

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

756

00

05

43

754/778

00

00

44

756/888

00

05

87

756/887

00

02

70

759/772

00

05

80

760

00

14

00

759

00

05

09

761

00

01

95

762/845

00

06

85

762/846

00

04

36

763

00

00

72

ANANTAYI

1365

00

03

14

1366

00

04

64

1367

00

02

00

1367/2328

00

05

15

1367/2330

00

05

15

1476

00

04

03

1433

00

08

65

1438

00

03

62

1438/2193

00

02

50

1437

00

01

36

1435/2175

00

00

51

1435

00

00

51

1449

00

08

06

1450

00

08

96

1458

00

07

25

1456

00

00

37

1457

00

00

50

1455

00

02

75

1453

00

00

58

1454

00

02

90

1466

00

04

61

1591

00

00

17

1590

00

09

45

1599

00

00

10

1589

00

00

10

1606

00

06

08

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3945

1584

00

12

45

1583

00

00

10

1582

00

03

63

1610

00

01

42

1579

00

03

46

1580

00

00

55

1580/1796

00

02

13

1578

00

02

22

1613

00

00

56

1577

00

04

56

1576

00

01

69

1575

00

00

77

1544

00

00

10

1545

00

06

54

1546

00

04

11

1547

00

00

10

1548

00

02

17

1571

00

03

90

1571/2187

00

01

55

1560

00

04

02

1560/2157

00

02

64

1552

00

01

26

1553

00

06

67

1554

00

04

45

1557

00

00

36

1555

00

02

56

781

00

05

32

736

00

00

70

739

00

06

89

740

00

04

08

741

00

01

30

743

00

09

01

744

00

04

08

745

00

02

30

754

00

07

84

BONTAPALLI

1154

00

00

63

1159

00

04

38

3946

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1153/2538

00

01

18

1161

00

02

23

1161/3007

00

06

68

1166

00

06

20

1164

00

01

00

1165

00

05

17

1145

00

02

97

1146

00

02

68

1147

00

00

10

1147/2762

00

00

10

1144

00

09

27

1135

00

06

34

1135/1953

00

01

05

1139

00

02

73

1139/2552

00

02

73

1140

00

01

50

1180

00

05

20

1138

00

00

10

1138/2121

00

00

10

1181

00

01

50

1215

00

01

54

1210

00

01

66

1210/2511

00

00

53

1210/2884

00

00

10

1210/2885

00

02

66

1210/3006

00

03

09

1210/3009

00

03

09

1210/3016

00

02

97

1219

00

01

57

1224

00

07

64

1226

00

00

26

1227

00

00

20

1222

00

04

18

1703

00

08

65

1709

00

00

16

1701

00

00

10

1708

00

05

28

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3947

1705

00

00

20

1707

00

06

49

1757

00

03

39

1759

00

01

90

CHAKUNDAJHOLA

165

00

13

15

165/399

00

01

03

169

00

21

32

169/424

00

01

53

169/427

00

01

40

169/428

00

01

30

169/429

00

01

53

201/371

00

08

49

201/370

00

13

70

202

00

01

26

202/366

00

00

30

202/368

00

02

84

207

00

11

29

211

00

01

71

211/337

00

04

87

209

00

16

86

KUSUMI

8/1124

00

10

79

8/1124/1346

00

09

50

8

00

00

23

105/1125

00

01

49

106

00

00

38

104

00

00

89

104/1295/1612

00

02

70

104/1369

00

01

65

104/1370

00

04

85

104/1653

00

03

59

104/1654

00

01

08

104/1295

00

13

69

1294

00

12

26

1292

00

15

80

86

00

00

10

85

00

05

19

84

00

01

06

3948

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

80

00

00

70

81

00

01

78

83/1136

00

03

67

82

00

00

88

83

00

03

40

311

00

02

70

310

00

02

29

309

00

02

36

312

00

06

20

308

00

00

92

313

00

00

96

318

00

15

41

320

00

02

72

326

00

00

10

325

00

10

76

335

00

05

08

328

00

13

80

332

00

01

79

331

00

10

95

330

00

00

13

330/1642

00

00

10

342/966

00

02

21

343

00

15

38

343/1345

00

00

60

343/1371

00

00

85

343/1585

00

00

83

344

00

18

04

292

00

01

84

292/1457

00

02

23

292/1537

00

01

53

292/1547

00

00

76

292/1551

00

00

46

292/1548

00

01

40

292/1549

00

02

75

292/1623

00

01

68

291

00

00

11

291/1077

00

15

47

291/1613

00

00

65

291/1640

00

01

54

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3949

[F. No. R-11025(11)/236/2017-OR-I/E-13717]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

430

00

06

12

430/1376

00

03

05

430/1403

00

04

56

431

00

08

41

431/1377

00

02

96

448

00

04

45

447/1334

00

04

19

1071

00

04

73

446/1332

00

01

72

445

00

03

00

445/1602

00

03

49

445/1604

00

22

27

440

00

02

55

ARJUNAPUR

11

00

03

76

13

00

00

16

22

00

12

54

90

00

09

94

92

00

00

77

91

00

02

94

85

00

16

33

88

00

00

12

84

00

03

49

83

00

05

88

98

00

09

42

99

00

02

33

126

00

01

58

JUGUDI

570

00

06

70

580

00

15

75

577

00

10

39

1835

00

16

54

1830

00

09

85

1831

00

01

73

1836

00

00

67

1838

00

15

85

1840

00

00

22

1841

00

06

47

3950

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

नई दली, 15 मई, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 812

812

812

812. —dsUnzh; ljdkj] isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbZiykbZu ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½

vf/kfu;e] 1962 ¼1962 dk 50½ dk /kkjk 3 dh mi/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk iznRr 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] Hkkjr ds jkti= Hkkx

II] [k.M 3] mi[k.M ¼ii½ rkjh[k 16 Qjojh 2017 es i`"B 8 ij izdkf’kr Hkkjr ljdkj ds isVªksfy;e vkSj izkÑfrd xSl

ea=ky; dh vf/klwpuk la- dk- vk- 493¼v½ rkjh[k 8 Qjojh] 2017 esa fuEufyf[kr la’kks/ku djrh gS] vFkkZr~ %&

mDr vf/klwpuk dh vuqlwph esa %&

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

Rkglhy& MHkk¢bZ ftyk& oMk¢njk

jkT; & XkqTkjkr

ds LFkku ij

i<s+

e©tk@ xzke

lo¢Z uaCkj

e©tk@ xzke

lo¢Z uaCkj

N=ky

221

N=ky

211 ¼250 u;k½

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/104/2017-ओआर-I/ई-8039]

पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018

S.O. 812.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals

pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby makes the

following amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas,

number S. O. 493(E) dated 8th February 2017, published at page 19 in part II, section 3, sub-section (ii) of the Gazette

of India, dated 16th February 2017, namely:-

In the Schedule to the said notification:-

SCHEDULE

Tehsil:- Dabhoi District:- Vadodara State:- Gujarat

For

Read

Mouja/Village

Survey Number

Mouja/Village

Survey Number

Chhatral

221

Chhatral

211 (250 New)

[F. No. R-11025(11)/104/2017-OR-I/E-8039]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

नई दली, 15 मई, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 813

813

813

813.—क ीय सरकार को ऐसा *तीत होता है क लोक िहत म यह आवqयक है क आंu *देश राKय म पेोिलयम

उoपाद. के पLरवहन के िलए पारादीप-हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन पLरयोजना के pया वयन हेतु इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपUरेशन िलिमटेड )ारा

पाइपलाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए;

और क ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन िबछाने के *योजन के िलए यह आवqयक *तीत होता है क ऐसी भूिम म जो इस से

ऊपाबd अनुसूची म वOणत है, और िजसम उ- पाइपलाइन िबछाई जाने का *wताव है, उपयोग के अिधकार का अज न कया जाए;

अतः अब, के ीय सरकार,पेोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइ स (भूिम म उपयोग के अिधकार का अज न) अिधिनयम 1962

(1962 का 50) क( धारा 3 क( उपधारा (1) )ारा *द+ शि-य. का *योग करते 0ए उस भूिम म उपयोग के अिधकार का अज न करने के

अपने आशय क( घोषणा करती है;

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3951

कोई भी xि-, जो उ- अनुसूची म वOणत भूिम म िहतबd है, उस तारीख से, िजसको इस अिधसूचना म यु- भारत के

राजप4 क( *ितयाँ साधारण जनता को उपलWध करा दी जाती हy, इi(स (21) दन के भीतर, भूिम के नीचे पाइपलाइन िबछाए जाने के

िलए उसम उपयोग के अिधकार के संब ध म zी के. ए. एस जेिHसन, सYम *ािधकारी (आंu *देश),इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपUरेशन िलिमटेड

(पाइपलाइन *भाग), पारादीप-हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन पLरयोजना, Eलॉट सं7या 33, कनका दुगा ऑफसस कॉलोनी, गुIनानक नगर मेन

रोड िवजयवाड़ा-520008, आंu *देश राKय को िलिखत Nप से आYेप भेज सकेगा|

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

िजला: कृ{णा

राKय: आ u *देश

मंडलका नाम

Cाम का नाम

सव` नcबर

Yे4फल

हेhटेयर

एयर

वग मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

छ4य

बुIगुगूडेम

53/8

00

07

24

ए.क.डूI

माधवरम वेwट

185/1

00

36

34

220

00

50

53

जी.को डूN

चेवुटूI

52/4C

00

00

01

54/4

00

14

67

72/1B

00

02

75

72/1A

00

06

72

73/2B

00

01

94

73/2A

00

12

61

जी.को डूN

को डूN

21/2

00

05

96

21/1B

00

04

48

21/1A

00

25

06

30/1

00

06

32

29/1

00

20

86

29/2

00

00

50

36

00

04

68

35/1

00

00

99

37/4

00

19

77

38/1

00

02

86

43/3

00

16

73

44/3A

00

13

90

3952

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

44/2

00

12

33

44/4B1

00

05

71

44/4A

00

04

78

46

00

00

75

52/2

00

06

78

56/1C

00

05

00

जी.को डूN

ग|ामनुगु

51/3

00

05

41

52/5

00

28

95

53/2

00

25

45

46/2

00

20

00

जी.को डूN

मुनगापाडु

148/A2B

00

08

34

जी.को डूN

लोया

99/2B1

00

11

85

पेनुगंिच*ोलु

पेनुगंिच*ोलु

328/1B

00

23

22

328/1A

00

23

31

वoसवाई

भीमावरम

434/2

00

00

53

25/2D

00

16

07

25/2C

00

04

72

25/1B

00

18

30

ज}ग~यापेटा

बसुपाडू

69/3C/1B

00

07

83

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/252/2017-ओआर-I/ई-21033]

पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018

S.O. 813.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government, that it is necessary in the public interest that for

the transportation of petroleum products in the state of Andhra Pradesha pipeline should be laid for implementing

Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline Project under Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is

necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which is

described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub Section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and

Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby

declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person, who is interested in the land described in the said schedule, may submit objection in writing to

Shri. K.A.S Jennyson, Competent Authority (Andhra Pradesh), Indian Oil Corporation Limited (Pipelines Division),

Paradip Hyderabad Pipeline Project, Plot No. 33, Kanaka Durga officer’s Colony,Gurunank Nagar Main Road,

Vijayawada -520008 within twenty one (21) days from the date on which the copies of this notification issued under

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3953

Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the general

public.

SCHEDULE

District : Krishna

State : Andhra Pradesh

Name of Mandal

Name of Village

Survey No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Square Metre

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

Chatrai

Burugugudem

53/8

00

07

24

A.Konduru

Madhavaram West

185/1

00

36

34

220

00

50

53

G. Konduru

Chevuturu

52/4C

00

00

01

54/4

00

14

67

72/1B

00

02

75

72/1A

00

06

72

73/2B

00

01

94

73/2A

00

12

61

G. Konduru

Konduru

21/2

00

05

96

21/1B

00

04

48

21/1A

00

25

06

30/1

00

06

32

29/1

00

20

86

29/2

00

00

50

36

00

04

68

35/1

00

00

99

37/4

00

19

77

38/1

00

02

86

43/3

00

16

73

44/3A

00

13

90

44/2

00

12

33

44/4B1

00

05

71

44/4A

00

04

78

46

00

00

75

52/2

00

06

78

56/1C

00

05

00

G. Konduru

Gaddamanugu

51/3

00

05

41

52/5

00

28

95

53/2

00

25

45

46/2

00

20

00

G.Konduru

Munagapadu

148/A2B

00

08

34

G.Konduru

Loya

99/2B1

00

11

85

3954

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Penuganchiprolu

Penuganchiprolu

328/1B

00

23

22

328/1A

00

23

31

Vatsavai

Bhimavaram

434/2

00

00

53

25/2D

00

16

07

25/2C

00

04

72

25/1B

00

18

30

Jaggayyapeta

Balsupadu

69/3C/1b

00

07

83

[F. No. R-11025(11)/252/2017-OR-I/E-21033]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

नई दली, 15 मई, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 814

814

814

814.— के ीय सरकार ने पेोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूिम म उपयोग के अिधकार का अज न) अिधिनयम,

1962 (1962 का 50) (िजसे इसम इसके पQात उ- अिधिनयम कहा गया है) क( धारा 3 उप धारा (1) के अधीन जारी क( गई, भारत

सरकार के पेोिलयम और *ाकृितक गैस मं4ालय क( अिधसूचना का.आ. 2098 तारीख 06.09.2017 िजसका *काशन भारत के

राजप4 सं7या 36, भाग II, ख;ड 3, उप ख;ड (ii) तारीख 09.09.2017 म कया गया है। इस अिधसूचना म संलZ अनुसूची म

िविन[द\ आंu*देश राKय के मंडल : जी.को डूN िजला: कृ{णा क( भूिम म, ओडीशा राKय म पारादीप से तेलंगाना राKय म हैदराबाद

तक पेोिलयम उoपाद. के पLरवहन के िलए इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपUरेशन िलिमटेड के )ारा pयाि वत कए जा रहे “पारादीप-हैदराबाद

पाइपलाइन पLरयोजना” के संबंध म पाइपलाइन िबछाने के *योजन के िलए उपयोग के अिधकार का अज न करने के िलए अपने आशय

क( घोषणा क( थी:

और उ- राजप4 अिधसूचना क( *ितयाँ जनता को उपलWध करा दी गई थe। और उ- अिधिनयम क( धारा 6 क( उपधारा (1)

के अनुसरण म सYम *ािधकारी ने के ीय सरकार को अपनी Lरपोट दे दी है।

और के ीय सरकार ने उ- Lरपोट पर िवचार करने के पQात और यह समाधान हो जाने पर क उ- भूिम पाइपलाइन

िबछाने के िलए अपेिYत है, उसम उपयोग के अिधकार का अज न करने का िविन{चय कया है:

अतः अब, के ीय सरकार उ- अिधिनयम क( धारा 6 क( उपधारा (1) )ारा *द+ शि-य. का *योग करते 0ए एत€ारा

घोषणा करती है क इस अिधसूचना से संलZ अनुसूिच म िविन[द\ भूिम म पाइपलाइन िबछाने के उपयोग का अिधकार अOजत कया

जाए:

और के ीय सरकार उ- अिधिनयम क( धारा 6 क( उपधारा (4) )ारा *द+ शि-य. का *योग करते 0ए, यह िनद`श देती है

क उ- भूिम म उपयोग का अिधकार इस घोषणा के *काशन क( तारीख से के ीय सरकार म िनिहत होने के बजाए सभी िबलंगम. से

मु- होकर इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपUरेशन िलिमटेड म िनिहत होगा।

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

िजला: कृ{णा राKय: आ u *देश

मंडल का नाम

Cाम का नाम

सव` नcबर

Yे4फल

हेhटेयर

एयर

वग मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

जी.को डूN

को डूN

43/6

00

05

37

45/1

00

00

09

47

00

44

02

48/1

00

45

14

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3955

53/1

00

26

06

78/1A

00

21

50

54/1

00

06

62

54/2A

00

14

47

54/2B

00

04

43

54/2C

00

06

68

61/1

00

29

55

61/2

00

00

29

60/4

00

13

04

60/3

00

17

85

60/2

00

02

02

56/4

00

23

71

जी.को डूN

ग|ामनुगु

40/B 2

00

06

79

40/B 1

00

10

97

40/ A

00

01

07

13

00

30

68

15/1 A

00

02

39

15/1 F

00

14

36

15/1 G

00

00

03

15/1 E

00

03

72

15/1 D

00

03

40

15/1 C

00

04

42

15/1 B

00

04

18

18/1

00

19

40

19

00

40

02

20/3

00

04

07

132/1B

00

17

51

132/2A

00

16

09

132/3C

00

15

15

3956

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

136/A 5B

00

09

25

136/A 4 A

00

11

32

136/A 3 A/2

00

05

08

136/A 3 C/1

00

01

32

136/A 2 C

00

02

90

136/B 1

00

10

95

162/2 A

00

02

95

162/2 B

00

06

92

163/1

00

23

91

162/2 C

00

25

82

153/2C

00

02

47

153/1A3

00

17

05

जी.को डूN

चेIवु माधवरम

81/3

00

05

41

81/2.B

00

11

23

81/2.A

00

02

63

86/2

00

22

98

169/1

00

29

79

169/2

00

08

84

169/3

00

07

41

172/4

00

19

77

175/2

00

23

69

175/1

00

04

81

175/3

00

00

63

176

00

39

05

जी.को डूN

कवुलूI

17/1

00

01

46

18/1A

00

08

82

18/2A

00

16

22

18/3A

00

09

39

18/4

00

11

35

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3957

19/2A

00

12

07

19/2B

00

06

67

19/2C

00

08

89

19/2D

00

16

04

50/2A

00

06

23

50/2B

00

10

08

50/3

00

17

09

50/4

00

07

58

51/1A

00

02

56

51/2

00

13

61

51/3

00

15

11

65/1

00

13

51

65/2

00

03

97

63/1

00

08

45

63/4

00

06

22

63/3

00

01

41

63/6

00

03

53

63/9

00

00

05

63/7

00

04

07

63/8

00

17

44

63/19

00

00

06

63/20

00

00

06

64/2B

00

09

76

64/2C

00

12

22

64/3

00

00

76

49/1B

00

00

06

50/1B

00

04

13

50/1A

00

01

50

49/2A

00

00

64

3958

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

44

00

12

44

जी.को डूN

लोया

95/1B

00

04

65

96/2

00

30

36

99/1B

00

14

10

99/2B3

00

00

42

102/1B

00

09

54

105

00

01

27

124/1

00

10

95

126/13

00

02

91

126/12

00

04

74

126/10

00

08

08

126/9

00

06

76

126/8

00

00

68

126/6

00

01

18

126/7

00

06

60

126/4

00

03

05

126/3

00

05

69

126/2

00

06

20

126/1

00

08

60

127

00

41

71

130/2

00

28

26

130/1

00

17

81

117

00

07

64

114/2

00

11

79

114/1

00

24

34

87/2C3

00

03

25

87/2B

00

05

14

87/2C1

00

02

59

56/2

00

13

46

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3959

57/2

00

20

46

56/1A

00

18

88

55/2

00

07

56

40/2

00

36

24

39

00

19

96

38/1B

00

21

92

10

00

02

35

11/1C1

00

26

90

12

00

06

08

8

00

32

61

16

00

12

15

18/3C

00

14

77

18/3A

00

62

60

जी.को डूN

सुHमपाडु

13

00

00

88

15

00

46

21

76/1

00

42

36

जी.को डूN

दुि}गरालापाडु

69

00

40

69

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/252/2017-ओआर-I/ई-21033]

पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018

S.O. 814.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural

Gas, published in the Gazette of India No.36 Part-II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii) dated 09.09.2017 vide S.O. Number

2098 dated 06.09.2017 issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals pipelines (Acquisition

of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) the Central Government

declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land situated in Mandal G.Konduru District Krishna in Andhra

Pradesh State, specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the

transportation of petroleum products from Paradip in the State of Odisha to Hyderabad in the State of Telangana by the

Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the "Paradip–Hyderabad Pipeline Project".

And whereas the copies of the Gazette were made available to the public. And whereas the Competent

Authority has under Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, has submitted his report of Central Government.

And whereas, the Central Government after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said

land is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of the user therein;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is

hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

3960

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby directs that the right of user of the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the

Central Government, vests on the date of publication of the declaration, in India Oil Corporation Limited, free from all

encumbrances.

SCHEDULE

District : Krishna

State : Andhra Pradesh

Name of Mandal

Name of Village

Survey No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Square

Metre

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

G. Konduru

Konduru

43/6

00

05

37

45/1

00

00

09

47

00

44

02

48/1

00

45

14

53/1

00

26

06

78/1A

00

21

50

54/1

00

06

62

54/2A

00

14

47

54/2B

00

04

43

54/2C

00

06

68

61/1

00

29

55

61/2

00

00

29

60/4

00

13

04

60/3

00

17

85

60/2

00

02

02

56/4

00

23

71

G.Konduru

Gaddamanugu

40/B 2

00

06

79

40/B 1

00

10

97

40/ A

00

01

07

13

00

30

68

15/1 A

00

02

39

15/1 F

00

14

36

15/1 G

00

00

03

15/1 E

00

03

72

15/1 D

00

03

40

15/1 C

00

04

42

15/1 B

00

04

18

18/1

00

19

40

19

00

40

02

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3961

20/3

00

04

07

132/1B

00

17

51

132/2A

00

16

09

132/3C

00

15

15

136/A 5B

00

09

25

136/A 4 A

00

11

32

136/A 3 A/2

00

05

08

136/A 3 C/1

00

01

32

136/A 2 C

00

02

90

136/B 1

00

10

95

162/2 A

00

02

95

162/2 B

00

06

92

163/1

00

23

91

162/2 C

00

25

82

153/2C

00

02

47

153/1A3

00

17

05

G.Konduru

Cheruvu Madhavaram

81/3

00

05

41

81/2.B

00

11

23

81/2.A

00

02

63

86/2

00

22

98

169/1

00

29

79

169/2

00

08

84

169/3

00

07

41

172/4

00

19

77

175/2

00

23

69

175/1

00

04

81

175/3

00

00

63

176

00

39

05

G.Konduru

Kavuluru

17/1

00

01

46

18/1A

00

08

82

18/2A

00

16

22

18/3A

00

09

39

18/4

00

11

35

19/2A

00

12

07

19/2B

00

06

67

19/2C

00

08

89

19/2D

00

16

04

3962

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

50/2A

00

06

23

50/2B

00

10

08

50/3

00

17

09

50/4

00

07

58

51/1A

00

02

56

51/2

00

13

61

51/3

00

15

11

65/1

00

13

51

65/2

00

03

97

63/1

00

08

45

63/4

00

06

22

63/3

00

01

41

63/6

00

03

53

63/9

00

00

05

63/7

00

04

07

63/8

00

17

44

63/19

00

00

06

63/20

00

00

06

64/2B

00

09

76

64/2C

00

12

22

64/3

00

00

76

49/1B

00

00

06

50/1B

00

04

13

50/1A

00

01

50

49/2A

00

00

64

44

00

12

44

G.Konduru

Loya

95/1B

00

04

65

96/2

00

30

36

99/1B

00

14

10

99/2B3

00

00

42

102/1B

00

09

54

105

00

01

27

124/1

00

10

95

126/13

00

02

91

126/12

00

04

74

126/10

00

08

08

126/9

00

06

76

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3963

126/8

00

00

68

126/6

00

01

18

126/7

00

06

60

126/4

00

03

05

126/3

00

05

69

126/2

00

06

20

126/1

00

08

60

127

00

41

71

130/2

00

28

26

130/1

00

17

81

117

00

07

64

114/2

00

11

79

114/1

00

24

34

87/2C3

00

03

25

87/2B

00

05

14

87/2C1

00

02

59

56/2

00

13

46

57/2

00

20

46

56/1A

00

18

88

55/2

00

07

56

40/2

00

36

24

39

00

19

96

38/1B

00

21

92

10

00

02

35

11/1C1

00

26

90

12

00

06

08

8

00

32

61

16

00

12

15

18/3C

00

14

77

18/3A

00

62

60

G. Konduru

Sunnampadu

13

00

00

88

15

00

46

21

76/1

00

42

36

G. Konduru

Duggiralapadu

69

00

40

69

[F. No. R-11025(11)/252/2017-OR-I/E-21033]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

3964

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Je ,oa jkstxkj ea=kky;

ubZ fnYyh] 7 ebZ] 2018

dk-vk- 815-—dsUnz ljdkj] jktHkk"kk (la?k ds 'kkldh; iz;kstuksa ds fy, iz;ksx) fu;e] 1976 (;Fkkla'kksf/r] 1987) ds

fu;e 10 ds mi&fu;e (4) ds vuqlj.k esa] Je vkSj jkstxkj ea=kky; ds iz'kkldh; fu;a=k.kk/khu fuEufyf[kr dk;kZy; dks] ftuds 80

izfr'kr ls vf/d deZpkfj;ksa us fgUnh dk dk;Zlk/kd Kku izkIr dj fy;k gS] ,rr~}kjk vf/lwfpr djrh gS%

01- 'kk[kk dk;kZy;] iBkudksV

02- 'kk[kk dk;kZy;] gksf'k;kjiqj

03- 'kk[kk dk;kZy;] ve`rlj

¹la- bZ&11016@1@2017&jk-Hkk-uh-º

nsosUnz ¯lg] vkfFkZd lykgdkj

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

New Delhi, the 7th May, 2018

S.O. 815.—In pursuance of Sub-Rule (4) of Rule of the Official Languages (Use for official purposes of the

Union) Rules, 1976 (as amended, 1987) the Central Government hereby notifies the following office under the

administrative control of the Ministry of Labour & Employment, more than 80% Staff whereof have acquired working

knowledge of Hindi.

01. Branch Office, Pathankot

02. Branch Office, Hoshiyarpur

03. Branch Office, Amritsar

[No. E-11016/1/2017-RBN]

DEVENDER SINGH, Economic Adviser

ubZ fnYyh] 14 ebZ] 2018

dk-vk- 816-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj cSad vkWiQ

jktLFkku fyfeVsM çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; vkS|ksfxd

vfèkdj.k t;iqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 09@98) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 14-05-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&12012@177@96&vkbZvkj (ch&I)º

ch-,l- fc"V] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 14th May, 2018

S.O. 816.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 09/98) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court Jaipur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Bank of Rajasthan Ltd.

and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 14.05.2018.

[No. L-12012/177/96-IR (B-I)]

B.S. BISHT, Section Officer

vuqca/k

vuqca/k

vuqca/k

vuqca/k

dsUnzh; vkS|ksfxd U;k;kf

dsUnzh; vkS|ksfxd U;k;kf

dsUnzh; vkS|ksfxd U;k;kf

dsUnzh; vkS|ksfxd U;k;kf/kdj.k] t;i

/kdj.k] t;i

/kdj.k] t;i

/kdj.k] t;iqjqjqjqj

ihBklhu vf/kdkjh%& fxjh'k dqekj 'kekZ] vkj-,p-ts-,l-

dsl uacj lh

dsl uacj lh

dsl uacj lh

dsl uacj lh-vkbZ

vkbZ

vkbZ

vkbZ-VhVhVhVh- 09@98

09@98

09@98

09@98

lhlhlhlh-vkbZ

vkbZ

vkbZ

vkbZ-,l

,l

,l

,l-

03@14

03@14

03@14

03@14

jSQjSal%

jSQjSal%

jSQjSal%

jSQjSal% dsUnz ljdkj] Je ea=ky;] ubZ fnYyh dk vkns’k dzekad ,y-&12012@177@96 vkbZ-vkj-[ch-] dsUnz ljdkj] fnukad 1-10-97

vukfn dkSf'kd iq= Jh ,y-,l- dkSf'kd fuoklh&13] 'kkyhekj ckx] vtesj jksM] ghjkiqjk] t;iqjA

------------izkFkhZA

izkFkhZA

izkFkhZA

izkFkhZA

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3965

cuke

cuke

cuke

cuke

¼1½ cSad vkWQ jktLFkku OkrZeku eas vkbZ-lh-vkbZ-lh-vkbZ- cSad fy- tfj;s

tujy eSustj pkSew gkml] lh&Ldhe] t;iqjA

¼2½ eSustj] cSad vkWQ jktLFkku] m|ksx Hkou] fryd ekxZ] t;iqjA

---foi{khx.k

foi{khx.k

foi{khx.k

foi{khx.kA

A

A

A

mifLFkr %

mifLFkr %

mifLFkr %

mifLFkr %

izkFkhZ dh vksj ls % fo}ku izfrfuf/k Jh tqxy fd'kksj vxzokyA

vizkFkhZ cSasd dh vksj ls % fo}ku izfrfuf/k Jh #ihu dkyk A

fnukad % 15

fnukad % 15

fnukad % 15

fnukad % 15-11111111-2017

2017

2017

2017

vfvfvfvf/kfu.kZ;

/kfu.kZ;

/kfu.kZ;

/kfu.kZ;

dsUnz ljdkj] Je ea=ky;]ubZfnYYkh ls mijksDr vkns'k ds tfj;s fuEu vuqlwph dk fookn vf/kfu.kZ; gsrq bl vf/kdj.k dks fnuakd 29-

7-98 dks izkIRk gqvk gSA

"Whether the action of the Managment of Bank of Rajasthan Ltd.,Jaipur is justified in terminating the

services of Sh.Anadi Kaushik[Workman] w.e.f.19-7-95[AN,without paying him notice pay and retrenchment

compensation in violatrion of section 25-F of I.D.Act,1947 ? If not,what relief to the workmen is entitled to ? "

izdj.k ntZ jftLVj fd;k tkdj mHk; i{kdkjku dks uksfVl tkjh fd, x,A izkFkhZ Jh vukfn dkSf'kd dh vksj ls fnuakd 26-8-98 dks

LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse is'k dj vfHkdFku fd;k x;k fd deZpkjh dh vizkFkhZ cSad dh m|ksx Hkou 'kk[kk esa izkjfEHkd fu;qfDr fnuakd 22 vxLr 1994

esa iklcqd jkbZVj ds #i esa dh xbZ Fkh rFkk fcuk fdlh O;o/kku ds izkFkhZ Jfed fofHkUu inksa ij 19 tqykbZ 1995 rd yxkrkj dk;Z djrk jgk

rFkk vpkud fnuakd 19-7-95 dks vizkFkhZ cSad ds vf/kdkfj;ksa dks bl ckr dk /;ku vk;k fd izkFkhZ djhc ,d o"kZ dk;Z dj pqdk gS rFkk ,d o"kZ esa

Hkh 240 fnol ls vf/kd dk;Z dj pqdk gS rFkk bl izdkj izkFkhZ dks vizkFkhZ cSad ls LFkk;h #i ls dk;Z djus dk dkuwuh vf/kdkj izkIr gks x;k

rFkk yxkrkj cus jgus dk Hkh vf/kdkj izkIr gks x;k rFkk bl ,d o"kZ dh vof/k dks de djus ds fy, vizkFkhZ cSad us izkFkhZ dh ekg uoacj o

fnlacj 1994 dh mifLFkfr dkVus dh dksf'k'k dh rFkk izkFkhZ dks fnuakd 2-3-95 ds ckn mifLFkfr ugha djus dh ijUrq dsoy gkftjh jftLVj esa

gktjh yxkus vFkok ugha yxkus ls dksbZ QdZ ugha iMrk gS rFkk vizkFkhZ cSad ds eSustj us ;g fy[kdj nsus dk ncko Mkyk fd izkFkhZ ;g fy[kdj

ns nsos fd izkFkhZ mDr vof/k eas dk;Z djus dk dksbZ dke dk nkok ugha djsxk vkSj ,slk ugha djus ds dkj.k izkFkhZ dks fnuakd 20-7-95 ls M;wVh ij

ugha vkus ds vkns'k ns fn;s x;s rFkk bl izdkj izkFkhZ dh lsok,sa fnuakd 20-7-95 ls lekIr dj nh x;hA izkFkhZ us viuh izFke fu;qfDr fnuakd

22 vxLr 1994 ls ysdj fnuakd 19-7-95 rd yxkrkj fcuk fdlh O;o/kku ds viuh lsok,sa vizkFkhZ dks vfiZr dh gSa rFkk vizkFkhZx.k us izkFkhZ dh

lsok,sa lekIr djus ls iwoZ vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e ds lHkh izko/kkuksa dks rkd esa aj[k fn;k rFkk u rks dksbZ ofj"Brk lwph cukbZ vkSj uk gh

dksbZ uksfVl vFkok uksfVl ds ,sot esa uksfVl ds osru dk gh Hkqxrku izkFkhZ dks fd;k x;k rFkk ubZ HkrhZ djus ls iwoZ dksbZ lwpuk Hkh izkFkhZ dks ugha

nh xbZ] tks fd dkuwuh #i ls vfuok;Z FkhA bl izdkj vizkFkhZx.k }kjk izkFkhZ dh lsok lekIr djuk vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk&25 ,Q

/kkjk&25 ,Q

/kkjk&25 ,Q

/kkjk&25 ,Q-

thththth- ,p

,p

,p

,p- ,oa ,u

,oa ,u

,oa ,u

,oa ,u- ds izko/kkuksa ds foijhr gS] tcfd budh ikyuk djuk eSUMsVjh gSA vr% izkFkhZ dh lsokeqfDr dks vuqfpr o voS/k fo'ks"kdj

vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e]1947 dh /kkjk&25 ,Q-th-,p- ,oa ,u- ds izko/kkuksa ds foijhr rFkk bl ,DV ds vUrxZr cus fu;e 77 o 78 ds

izko/kkuksa ds foijhr ?kksf"kr fd;k tkus rFkk izkFkhZ dks fiNys leLr osru o lsok ykHkksa ds lkFk foi{kh laLFkku esa iqu% cgkyh dk ?kksf"kr fd;k

tkus rFkk izkFkhZ dks fiNys osru o lsokykHkksa ij C;kt o okn dk [kpZ Hkh fnyk;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh gS lkFk gh {kfriwfrZ ds #i esa eqvkotk Hkh

fnyk;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh gSA

foi{kh cSad dh vksj ls izkFkhZ ;wfu;u ds LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse dk tokc izLrqr dj vfHkdFku fd;k gS fd cSad vkWQ jktLFkku }kjk ,d

uhfrxr fu.kZ; bl izdkj dk fy;k x;k Fkk fd ,sls fo|kFkhZ tks fd v/;;ujr gSa vkSj tks v/;;ujr jgrs gq, LokoyECkh cuuk pkgrs gSa] mUgsa

cSad esa xzkgdksa dks iklcqd fy[kus gsrq ,sxst fd;k tkos rFkk ,d fo|kFkhZ ek= nks ?kaVs ds fy, ikVZ VkbZe vlkbZuesaV ij j[ks x;s Fks vkSj mUgsa

fyfidh; oxZ dh xzsM dk 1@3 jsequjs'ku ds rkSj ij Hkqxrku fd;k tkrk Fkk rFkk ,sls fo|kFkhZ cSad ds dHkh deZpkjh fu;ksftr ugha fd, x, Fks

vkSj vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 dh /kkjk&2,l- ds rgr ,sls fo|kFkhZ deZdkj dh ifjf/k esa ugha vkrs gSaAizkFkhZ vukfn dkSf'kd dks Hkh

3966

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

va'akdkyhu rkSj ij iklcqd jkbZVj dh gSfl;r ls j[kk x;k Fkk rFkk izkFkhZ us dqy 179 fnu ls vf/kd foi{kh cSad esa va'kdkyhu iklcqd jkbZVj

dh gSfl;r ls dke ugha fd;k gS rFkk izkFkhZ dks izFke ckj fnuakd 22-8-94 ls 21-8-94 rd o fQj fnuakd 6-12-94 ls 2-3-95 rd dh vof/k esa

iklcqd jkbZVj dk dke fn;k x;k Fkk vkSj bl rjg mDr vof/k lekIr gks tkus ds ckn izkFkhZ dk foi{kh ds ;gka dk;Z Lor% lekIr gks x;k rFkk

izkFkhZ dks dHkh fdlh fu;e ;k izfdz;k dks viuk;k tkdj fu;fer #i ls fu;qfDr foi{kh cSad esa iznku ugha dh xbZ Fkh vkSj ,slh fLFkfr esa og

deZdkj dh ifjf/k esa ugha ekuk tk ldrk gS rFkk ,slh esa tks fookn mBk;k x;k gS og vkS|ksfxd fookn dh rkjhQ eas ugha ekuk tk ldrk bl

izdkj izkFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr Dyse ljljhrkSj ij gh [kkfjt fd;s tkus ;ksX; gksuk vfHkdFku djrs gq, fuosnu fd;k gS fd pwafd izkFkhZ vf/kfu;e

dh /kkjk&2,l-ds rgr deZdkj dh ifjf/k esa ugha vkrk gS] blfy, ml ij vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e ds izko/kku ykxw ugha gksrs gSa]blfy, mldk

;g Dyse pyus ;ksX; ugha gS vkSj ;fn izkFkhZ ij vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e ds izko/kku ykxw gksuk ekuk Hkh tkrk gS rks Hkh mldk ekeyk

vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk&2 vks vks ¼chch½ ds rgr vkrk gS vkSj og fdlh izdkj dh jkgr izkIr djus dk vf/kdkjh ugha gSA vUr esa izkFkhZ dh vksj ls

izLRkqr LVsVesV vkWQ Dyse [kkfjt fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh gSaA

eSaus mHk; i{k ds fo}ku izfrfuf/kx.k dh cgl lquh ,oa i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;kA

vc U;k;kf/kdj.k ds le{k vo/kkj.kh; fcUnq ;g gS fd D;k izkFkhZ deZdkj Jh vukfn dkSf'kd dk foi{kh cSad ls iklcqd jkbZVj ds

in ls lsoki;kZolku fnuakd 19-7-95 dks vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk&25,Q-ds izko/kkuksa ds vfrya?ku esa fd;k gS \ ;fn gkW] rks izkFkhZ

deZdkj D;k vuqrks"k ikus dk gdnkj gS \

vc bl laca/k esa loZizFke izkFkhZ deZdkj vukfn dkSf'kd dh lk{; dk ifj'khyu djsa rks mlus eq[; ijh{kk esa crk;k gS fd foi{kh cSad

esa mldh izFke fu;qfDr ikl cqd jkbZVj ds #i esa fnuakd 22-8-1994 dks dh xbZ Fkh rFkk rHkh ls og yxkrkj vizkFkhZ laLFkku esa fnuakd 19-7-1995

rd mlus dk;Z fd;k rFkk izFke fu;qfDr frfFk 22-8-1994 ls mls lsokeqDr fd;k x;k rc rd mlus 240 fnol ls vf/kd vof/k rd foi{kh

laLFkku esa dk;Z fd;k Fkk rFkk tc og 20-7-95 dks M;wVh ij x;k rks mls M;wVh ij ugha fy;k x;k rFkk mDr vof/k esa mlus iklcqd jkbZVj ds

vykok ystj iksfLVax] dEI;wVj vkijsVj dk dk;Z]ch-ih- o vU; yksu dh lIyhesUVjh fy[kus dk rFkk Dyh;fjax dk dk;Z Hkh fd;k Fkk rFkk 240

fnu ls vf/kd dk;Z djus ds dkj.k mls foi{kh cSad esa LFkk;h #i ls dk;Z djus dk vf/kdkj izkIRk gks x;k rFkk foi{kh cSad esa 100 ls vf/kd

Jfedx.k dk;Zjr gSa rFkk foi{kh us mls fcuk uksfVl fn;s lokeqDr fd;k gSAmldh foi{kh cSad dh frydekxZ 'kk[kk esa mifLFkfr ntZ gS rFkk

nLrkost izn'kZ MCY;w-1 ls MCY;w-4 izLrqr fd;s x;s gSaA ftjg esa bl xokg us ;g Lohdkj fd;k gS fd izn'kZ ,e-1 ls tks Hkqxrku nsuk mls crk;k

gS]og mlus izkIRk fd;k Fkk rFkk izn'kZ ,e-2 ls izn'kZ ,e-12ij mlds gLrk{kj gSaA ftjg esa xokg us bl lq>ko ls bUdkj fd;k gS fd vusDLpj ,

mlus feF;k cuk;k gks cfYd mlus fnuakd 22-8-94 ls 2-3-95 rd dk;Z fd;k gSA ftjg esa xokg us ;g Lohdkj fd;k gS fd cSad esa iklcqd jkbZVj

dk dk;Z fd;k]ml le; og fo|kFkhZ Fkk rFkk jktLFkku fo'ofo|ky; eas v/;;ujr Fkk rFkk mlus QqyVkbZe dk;Z fd;k Fkk A ftjg esa xokg us

;g Lohdkj fd;k gS fd mlds ikl cSad dk fyf[kr esa vkns'k fnuakd 3-3-95 ls 19-7-95 rd dk ugha gS] ysfdu mlus cSad eas izcU/kd dh vuqKk

ls dk;Z fd;k Fkk rFkk mls dksbZ cSad dh Ldhe dk ekyqe ugha gSA ftjg esa bl xokg us ;g Lohdkj fd;k gS fd mldh fu;qfDr ds fy, og cSad

ds fdlh lySD'ku cksMZ ds lkeus mifLFkr ugha gqvk rFkk ;g Lohdkj fd;k gS fd mldk uke jkstxkj dk;kZy; }kjk izLrqr fd;k x;k gksA ftjg

esa xokg us bl lq>ko ls bUdkj fd;k gS fd mlus viSDl dEiuh esa fnuakd 22-8-94 ls 21-11-94 vkSj fnuakd 6-12-94 ls 2-3-95 rd gh dke

fd;k gks ]mlus rks fnuakd 22-8-94 ls 19-7-95 rd yxkrkj dke fd;k gS rFkk mlus iklcqd jkbZVj ds vykok vU; dk;Z izcU/kd ds ekSf[kd

vknks'k ls fd;s Fks rFkk og 10 cts ls 7&8cts rd dk;Z djrk Fkk rFkk xokg us bl lq>ko ls bUdkj fd;k gS fd fnuakd 2-3-95 ls og cSad

dk dk;Z NksM pqdk gks rFkk mlds ckn dke djus ugha vk;k gks rFkk xokg us ftjg esa ;g Lohdkj fd;k gS fd fnuakd 20-7-95 ls lsokeqDr djus

ds ckjs esa dksbZ fyf[kr vkns'k ugha fn;k Fkk ekSf[kd vkns'k fn;k FkkA xokg us ftjg esa ;g Lohdkj fd;k gS fd mlds 'kiFki= ds iSjk ua-5 esa tks

mlls twfu;j O;fDr;ksa o u;s Jfedksa dh HkrhZ djus dk tks mYys[k fd;k gS mldh tkudkjh mls ugha gSA vuSDLpj&,-1mlds }kjk cuk;k gqvk gSA

vizkFkhZ lk{kh&1 ujsUnz dqekj tSu us viuh lk{; esa crk;k gS fd foi{kh cSad us ,d uhfrxr fu.kZ; bl izdkj fy;k Fkk tks fo|kFkhZ

v/;;ujr jgrs gq, vkfFkZd lg;ksx gsrq ikVZ VkbZe dk;Z djuk pkgrs gSa]mUgsa cSad ds xzkgdksa dh iklcqd fy[kus gsrq vuqcfU/kr fd;k tkos],sls

fo|kFkhZ ek= nks ?kaVs ds fy, ikVZVkbZe vlkbuesaV ij j[ks tkrs Fks vkSj mUgsa fyfidh; oxZ dk 1@3 jseujsjku ds rkSj ij Hkqxrku fd;k tkrk FkkA

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3967

bl izdkj vuqcaf/kr fd, x, ,sls O;fDr vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 dh /kkjk&2¼,l-½ds rgr deZdkj dh ifjHkk"kk eas ugha vkrs rFkk izkFkhZ

Jh vukfn dkSf'kd izn'kZ ,e-2 ds vk/kkj ij va'kdkyhu rkSj ij iklcqd jkbZVj ds #i eas fu;qDr fd;k x;k Fkk]ftlus dqy feykdj va'kdkyhu

rkSj ij iklcqd jkbZVj dh gSfl;r ls 179fnu dk;Z fd;k gS rFkk Jfed us izFke ckj fnuakd 22-8-94 ls 21-11-94 o mlds i'pkr fnuakd 6-12-94

ls 2-3-95 rd dh vof/k esa dk;Z fd;k Fkk rFkk fnuakd 2-3-95 ds i'pkr mls fu;qfDr ugh nh xbZ Fkh rFkk izkFkhZ dk fnuakd 6-12-94 ls 2-3-95 rd

dk fu;qfDri= izn'kZ ,e-20 gS rFkk fnuakd 20-7-95 rd foi{kh ds ;gka dk;Z ugha fd;k Fkk rFkk fuakd 6-12-94 ls 2-3-95 rd dk izkFkhZ dks Hkqxrku

Hkh fd;k x;k gS rFkk izkFkhZ dh fu;qfDr dh vof/k fnuakd 2-3-95 dks lekIr gks pqdh Fkh rFkk va'kdkyhu deZpkfj;ksa ls lacaf/kr fu;e izn'kZ ,e-13

gSa rFkk izkFkhZ mifLFkfr iaftdk esa Lo;a vius gkFk ls mifLFkfr ntZ djrk Fkk tks izn'kZ ,e-3 ls ,e-6 gS rFkk foi{kh cSad o viSDl dEI;wVj lfoZl

ds e/; MkVk ,UVªh lfoZlst vkWu ykbZu djus dk vuqcU/k gqvk Fkk]ftldk i= izn'kZ ,e-14 gS rFkk izkFkhZ us viSDl dEI;wVj lfoZl dh vksj ls ekpZ

1995 esa dk;Z fd;k]ftlds ckmpj izn'kZ ,e-21 ls ,e-24 gSa rFkk izkFkhZ Jfed }kjk foi{kh cSad esa fd;k x;k dk;Z fooj.k izn'kZ ,e-1 gS rFkk izkFkhZ

us 240 fnu dk;Z ugha fd;k gS rFkk viSDl dEI;wVj lfoZlst ,stsUlh }kjk izsf"kr i= izn'kZ ,e-1 ls ,e-19 gSa rFkk fnuakd 3-3-95 ls 29-7-95 rd

dh vof/k esa dk;Z djus ds fy, izkFkhZ dks dksbZ vkns'k foi{kh cSad }kjk ugha fn;k x;k FkkA ftjg esa bl xokg us bl lq>ko ls bUdkj fd;k gS fd

izn'kZ ,e-20 mifLFkfr jftLVj ds , ls ch o lh ls Mh Hkkx ckn eas fy[kk gks rFkk bl xokg us ftjg esa bl lq>ko ls bUdkj fd;k gS fd izkFkhZ

lqcg 10 cts ls lka; 5 cts rd dke djrk gks rFkk fu;qfDr vkns'k VkbZi ls fy[kk tkrk gks rFkk izn'kZ ,e-20 ls igys Hkh vkns'k fn;s gksaxs rFkk

blls igys vxLr ls uaocj rd dk vkns'k gS]tks i=koyh esa 'kkfey ugha gS rFkk bl fu;qfDr vkns'k eas ;g ugha fy[kk gqvk gS fd fo|kFkhZ gksus

dh otg ls fu;qfDr nh tk jgh gSA ftjg esa bl xokg us crk;k gS fd izkFkhZ deZdkj us fnuakd 2-3-95 ds i'pkr~ visDl dEI;wVj lfoZlst dk

dke pyk ftlesa cSad ds dEI;wVj dk dk;Z fd;k Fkk rFkk ikloMZ dsoy cSad deZpkjh dk Mkyk tkrk gS rFkk xokg us ftjg eas ;g crk;k gS fd

izn'kZ ,e-21 ls ,e-24 ij vukfn dkSf'kd ds gLrk{kj gSaAa

vizkFkhZ lk{kh 2 jkts'k fla?ky us viuh lk{; eas crk;k gS fd viSDl dEI;wVj lfoZlst uke dk laLFkku mldh ifRu ds uke ls gS rFkk

foi{kh cSad ls dksVs'ku Lohd`fr dk i= fnuakd 6-6-95 izn'kZ ,e-18 rFkk vukfn dkSf'kd ds }kjk cSad dk Bsds ds vuqlkj dk;Z lEiknu djus ckcr

i= fnuakd 17-7-95 izn'kZ ,e-17]iphZ izn'kZ ,e-25 gS rFkk vukfn dkSf'kd dEI;wVj lh[kus vDVwcj]1994 ls visDl dEI;wVj lfoZlst esa vk;k Fkk

rFkk vukfn dkSf'kd dks 2000@&#i;s udn fnuakd 19-5-1995 dks o fnuakd 24-6-1995 dks 1500@&#i;s dk pSd fn;k Fkk tks izn'kZ ,e-26 ls

,e-29 gSa rFkk jktLFkku cSad lsok esa Qjojh 95 ls tqykbZ 95 rd vukfn dkSf'kd visDl dEI;wVj lfoZlst ds dk;Z ij Fkk rFkk ftjg esa xokg us

crk;k gS fd viSDl dEI;wVj laLFkk ekg ekpZ&vizsy 1999 eas can gks pqdh Fkh rFkk bl laLFkk esa Vªsfuax nsdj izek.ki= fMIYkksek tkjh fd;s tkrs

gSa rFkk vko';drk vuqlkj Bsds ij Hkh dk;Z ij Hksts tkrs gSaA ikap O;fDr;ksa dks Bsds ij dk;Z ds fy, Hkstk x;k FkkA ftjg esa bl xokg us

Lohdkjk gS fd viSDl dEI;wVj lfoZlst o vukfn dksf'kd ds e/; fyf[kr esa dksbZ le>kSrk Bsds ds lEcU/k eas ugha gqvk Fkk rFkk izn'kZ ,e-12 ls

,e-14 o ,e-26 ls ,e-29 rd vukfn dkSf'kd ds gLrk{kj ugha gSaA

izkFkhZ ds fo}ku izfrfuf/k us fyf[kr cgl izLrqr djrs gq, cgl dh fd izkFkhZ Jfed vukfn dkSf'kd us foi{kh cSad esa fnukad 22-8-94 ls

fnuakd 19-7-95 rd iklcqd jkbZVj dk yxkrkj dk;Z fd;k gS rFkk jktLFkku cSad dk vc vkbZ lh vkbZ lh vkbZ- cSasd esa foy; gks pqdk gS] ftlds

fy, jsQjsUl esa rjehe dh vko';drk ugha gS rFkk izkFkhZ deZdkj us 240 fnu ls vf/kd fnol yxkrkj foi{kh cSad esa iw.kZdkfyd Jfed ds rkSj

ij dk;Z fd;k gS rFkk foi{kh cSad us fnuakd 20-7-95 ls izkFkhZ deZdkj dks dk;Z ij ysus ls ekSf[kd #i ls euk dj fn;k Fkk rFkk izkFkhZ deZdkj dks

u rks ,d ekg dk uksfVl osru fn;k vkSj u gh dksbZ eqvkotk gh fn;k rFkk tc izkFkhZ 240 fnu ls vf/kd fnol dk;Z dj pqdk Fkk rks foi{kh cSad

us /kkjk&25,Q- vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e ds izko/kku dh ikyuk Hkh ugha dh rFkk izkFkhZ deZdkj us o"kZ 2000 esa odkyr dh lun ys yh Fkh

ysfdu odkyr ugha dh Fkh blfy, dksbZ ykHkiw.kZ dk;Z ugha djus ls dksbZ vk; Hkh ugha gqbZ gS blfy, izkFkhZ deZdkj dks iklcqd jkbZVj ds in ij

iqu% LFkkfir fd;k tkosa A izkFkhZ ds fo}ku izfrfuf/k us U;k;kf/kdj.k dk /;ku fuEu U;kf;d fofu'p;ksa dh vksj vkd`"V fd;k gS%&

[1]

State of Punjab Vs. Jagjit Singh- A.I.R.2016 Supreme Court-5176.

[2]

Div. Manager, New India Assurance Co.Ltd. Vs. A. Sankaralingam-2008[6] S.L.R.-638.

[3]

Devinder Singh Vs. Municipal Council, Sanaur 2011 [2] R J T-1195.

3968

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

[4]

Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. Vs. State of U.P.and Others.-[2003] 6 Supreme Court Cases-528.

[5]

Secretary, H. S. E. B. Vs. Suresh-IR-1999 Supreme Court-1160.

[6]

M/s. National Thermal Power Corporation Vs. K. K. Shrivastava and others- 2003[97] FLR-

1065.

[7]

Anand Kishore Vs. Addl.Civil Judge & Ors.-2007[6]- W. L. C.-648.

[8]

Surendra Mehta Vs. Bapu Lal & Anr.-2008[2] W.L.C. [Raj.] 744.

[9]

Union of India Vs. Bhagawan- 2008-I- L.L.J.-925 [Raj].

[10]

0.P. Bhandari Vs.Indian Tourism developoment Corpn. Ltd.- AIR. 1987- Supreme Court-111.

[11]

Metropolitan Transport Corpn. Vs. V. Venkatesan -AIR- 2010 Supreme Court-206.

[12]

S. Seshachalam & Ors. ETC. Vs. Chairman, Bar Council of Tamil Nadu & Ors.-2015[1] WLC

[sc] civil-342.

[13]

Hochtief Gammon Vs.Industrial Tribunal Bhubaneshwar, Orissa and others.-AIR 1964-

Supreme Court-1746.

[14]

Indian Bank Vs.K.Usha and another-1998 [78] Supreme Court -801.

[15]

Bhagwan Dass Chopra Vs.United Bank of India-1987 [55] FLR-909.

[16]

M/s. P. V. K. Distillery Ltd. Vs. Mahendra Ram-AIR-2009- Supreme Court-2205.

[17]

Management of MCD. Vs.Prem Chand Gupta & Anr.-2000[1]-SLR-81.

blds izfrdkj esa foi{kh ds fo}ku izfrfuf/k us cgl dh fd vizkFkhZ cSad esa fo|kfFkZ;ksa dks Lokoyacu cukus ds fy, ,d ;kstuk ds

vUrxZr izkFkhZ dks va'kdkyhu iklcqd jkbZVj ds fy, j[kk x;k Fkk] tks fnuakd 22-8-1994 ls 2-3-1995 rd j[kk x;k Fkk vkSj og Hkh viSDl

dEI;wVj lfoZlst ds ekQZr j[kk x;k Fkk rFkk izkFkhZ va'kdkyhu 2 ?k.Vs dk;Z djrk Fkk rFkk izkFkhZ dh dksbZ fu;kstu p;u gksdj fdlh in ij

fu;qfDr ugha gqbZ Fkh rFkk izkFkhZ deZdkj us 240 fnol dk;Z ugha fd;k Fkk] blfy, vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk&25,Q- ds izko/kku dh

ikyuk dh vko';drk ugha Fkh rFkk o"kZ 2000 ls izkFkhZ odkyr ds is'ks esa gS blfy, odkyr ds is'ks okyk O;fDr deZdkj dh rkjhQ esa ugha vkrk

gS rFkk odkyr ds is'ks esa gksus ls izkFkhZ fdlh fof/kor laLFkk }kjk p;fur ugha gksus ls iqufuZ;qfDr dk ;k fdlh eqvkots dk gdnkj ugha gSA

vizkFkhZ ds fo}ku izfrfuf/k us U;k;kf/kdj.k dk /;ku fuEu U;kf;d fofu'p;ksa dh vksj vkd`"V fd;k gS%&

[1]

District Co-operative Bank Ltd. Jaunpur Vs. Labour Court-2012[135]-FLR-581.

[2]

Bhim Sain Vs.Government of NCT of Delhi-2014[142]-FLR- 79.

[3]

Shriram Institute for Industrial Research Vs. Rajesh Kumar Gandhi-2013[136]FLR-12.

[4]

Peter Ramesh Kumar Vs.Executive Director, Marshalls Power and Communication India [p]

Ltd., Chennai and others.-2007[114] FLR-1167.

[5]

Oshiar Prasad and others Vs. E Smploykers in relation to Management of sudamdih coal

washery of M/s.Bharat coking Coal Limited, Dhanbad, JHARKHAND-2015[4]SCC-71.

[6]

Indian Sulphacid Industries Ltd. Vs. Labour Court Rohtak- 1992-LLR-462.

eSaus mHk; i{k ds fo}ku izfrfuf/kx.k dh cgl ij euu fd;k ,oa mijksDr U;kf;d fofu'p;ksa dk lEekuiwoZd ifj'khyu fd;kA

vc tgka rd vizkFkhZ ds fo}ku izfrfuf/k dk ;g rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ deZdkj dks va'kdkfyd iklcqd jkbZVj ds #i esa visDl dEI;wVj

lfoZlst ds ekQZr j[kk x;k Fkk rFkk izkFkhZ dsoy nks ?kaVs dk;Z djrk FkkA bl rdZ ds laca/k esa mHk; i{k dh lk{; ds foospu eas U;k;kf/kdj.k dk

fouez er ;g gS fd loZizFke rks izkFkhZ deZdkj us viuh lk{; esa crk;k gS fd foi{kh cSad esa iklcqd jkbZfVax]ystj ukbZfVax o cSad ls lacaf/kr

vU; dk;Z izkr% 10 cts ls lka; 5 cts rd djrk Fkk rFkk izkFkhZ deZdkj ls bl fcUnq ij ftjg ls dksbZ foijhr ifjfLFkfr Hkh ugha vk;h gS rFkk

ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; ds U;kf;d fofu'p;&Div. Manager, New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. A. Sankaralingam-

2008[6] S.L.R.-638. esa izfrikfnr fl)kar dh jks'kuh esa fd vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk&2¼,l-½ds rgr deZpkjh dh ifjHkk"kk ls

va'kdkyhu deZdkj vioftZr ugha gksrk gS]blfy, ;fn vizkFkhZ ds fo}ku izfrfuf/k dh ;g nyhy rdZ ds fy, eku Hkh yh tkos rks Hkh va'kdkyhu

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3969

deZdkj Hkh vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk&2¼,l-½ds rgr deZdkj dh rkjhQ esa vkrk gS] blfy, izkFkhZ Jh vukfn dkSf'kd foi{kh cSad esa

deZdkj ugha jgk gks] ,slk ekus tkus dk dksbZ vk/kkj ugha gSaA

vc tgka rd vizkFkhZ ds fo}ku izfrfuf/k dk ;g rdZ gS fd vizkFkhZ dks foi{kh cSad us fnuakd 22-8-94 ls fnuakd 2-3-95 rd iklcqd

jkbZVj ds #i esa j[kk Fkk rFkk izkFkhZ us dsoy 179 fnol dk;Z fd;k Fkk] blfy, 240 fnu ;k 240 fnol ls vf/kd dk;Z ugha fd;k Fkk] bl nyhy

ds lEcU/k esa ;fn mHk; i{k dh lk{; dk foospu djsa] rks izkFkhZ us fnuakd 22-8-94 ls 19-7-95 rd yxkrkj foi{kh cSasd esa dk;Z djuk viuh lk{;

esa crk;k gS rFkk foi{kh dh vksj ls tks mifLFkfr iaftdk izn'kZ ,e-3 ls ,e-6 ,oa izn'kZ ,e-20 izLrqr dh xbZ gSa]buesa izkFkhZ deZdkj dks fnuakd 2-3-

95 ds i'pkr fjyho djuk crk;k x;k gS] tcfd fjyho dk dksbZ fyf[kr esa vkns'k fn;k x;k gks],slk vfHkys[k ij izLrqr ugha fd;k x;k gS rFkk

bl lEcU/kesa izkFkhZ dh vksj ls viuh lk{; esa crk;k x;k gS fd mifLFkfr iaftdk iw.kZ #i ls vizkFkhZ cSad us is'k ugha dh gS rFkk bl laca/k esa ;fn

vizkFkhZ cSad ds lk{kh ujsUnz dqekj tSu dh lk{; dk ifj'khyu djsa rks bl xokg us viuh izfrijh{kk esa ;g Lohdkj fd;k gS fd fnuakd 2-3-95 ds

i'pkr izkFkhZ deZdkj us viSDl dEI;wVj lfoZlst ds ekQZr foi{kh cSad esa dEI;wVj ij dk;Z fd;k gS]bldk rkRi;Z ;g gqvk fd izkFkhZ deZdkj dks

izkjfEHkd rkSj ij rks foi{kh cSad us iklcqd jkbZVj ds in ij dk;Z djus ds fy, fu;qDr fd;k Fkk mlds i'pkr viSDl dEI;wVj lfoZlst ds

ek/;e ls fnuakd 2-3-95 ds i'pkr dk;Z ij izkFkhZ deZdkj foi{kh cSad esa dk;Zjr jgk gS rks foi{kh ds nLrkost izn'kZ ,e-11o ,e-12 esa foi{kh cSad

}kjk izkFkhZ deZdkj dks fnuakd 3-5-95 dks osru ds isVs 700@&#i;s vfxze izkFkhZ dks Hkqxrku fd;k x;k gS vkSj ;g Hkh ;g n'kkZrk gS fd izkFkhZ

ekg ebZ]1995 esa Hkh foi{kh cSad esa dk;Zjr jgk gS rFkk jkT; ljdkj }kjk tks jsQjsUl fn;k x;k gS vkSj mlesa tks lsok i;kZolu frfFk crkbZ xbZ gS]

og Hkh fnuakd 19-7-95 crkbZ xbZ gS] tks foi{kh cSad ds nLrkost ls gh izkFkhZ deZdkj dk fnuakd 19-7-95 rd foi{kh cSad esa dk;Zjr jguk vk;k gS]

tks 240 fnol ls vf/kd dh vof/k rd foi{kh cSad esa izkFkhZ dk dk;Zjr jguk vk;k gS] tks foi{kh cSad ds xokg ujsUnz dqekj tSu dh lk{; ls

Hkh LFkkfir gS vkSj egt viSDl dEI;wVj lfoZlst ds ekQZr ;fn ckn esa foi{kh cSd us izkFkhZ dks dk;Z ij j[kk gS] rks og tc izkFkhZ izkjfEHkd rkSj

ij foi{kh cSad }kjk dk;Zjr jgk gS] rks mlls izkFkhZ dh izkfLFkfr esa rCnhyh gqbZ gks] ,slk ugha ekuk tk ldrk] blfy, izkFkhZ vkSj vizkFkhZ dh lk{;

ds mijksDr foospu ds QyLo#i izkFkhZ deZdkj }kjk 240 fnu ls vf/kd fnol dk;Z foi{kh cSad esa iklcqd jkbZVj ds in ij dk;Z djuk LFkkfir

gS rFkk ;g fufoZokn fLFkfr gS fd foi{kh cSad us izkFkhZ dks ,d ekg dk uksfVl ;k NaVuh eqvkotk ugha fn;k vkSj blfy, vkS|ksfxd fookn

vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk&25,Q-dh ikyuk ugha fd;k tkuk Hkh vfHkys[k ls izdV gSaA

vc tgka rd vizkFkhZ ds fo}ku izfrfuf/k dk ;g rdZ jgk gS fd izkFkhZ deZdkj lu~ 2000 ls odkyr ds is'ks esa gSA bl laca/k eas vizkFkhZ

ds fo}ku izfrfuf/k dh vksj ls U;k;kf/kdj.k dk /;ku fuEu U;kf;d fofu'p;ksa .[1] 2007[114] FLR-1167., [2] 2014[142]-FLR-79.,

[3] 1992-LLR-462. dh vksj vkd`"V fd;k gSA bu U;kf;d fofu'p;ksa dk lEekuiwoZd ifj'khyu fd;k A bu U;kf;d fofu'p;ksa eas tks ekuuh;

U;k;ky; us fl)kar izfrikfnr fd;k gS fd fof/k lgk;d] fof/k lykgdkj deZdkj dh rkjhQ esa ugha vkrk gS] tcfd gLrxr ekeys esa izkFkhZ

deZdkj lu~ 2000 esa odkyr ds is'ks esa vk;k gS rFkk lu~ 1994 eas og odkyr ds is'ks esa ugha Fkk] blfy, ;g mijksDr U;kf;d fofu'p; ds

ekeys ds rF; gLrxr ekeys ds rF; ls fHkUurk ds dkj.k bl izdj.k eas vkd`"V ugha gksrs gSa rFkk U;kf;d fofu'p;&2015[4]SCC-71dk

U;k;kf/kdj.k }kjk lEekuiwoZd ifj'khyu fd;k x;k] bl U;kf;d fofu'p; ds ekeys ds rF; ;g gSa fd deZdkj ds fu;fefrdj.k ,oa ,CtkiZ'ku

dk iz'u vUrxzZLr Fkk] tcfd gLrxr ekeys esa izkFkhZ deZdkj ds fu;fefrdj.k ;k ,CtkiZ'ku dk dksbZ iz'u vUrxzZLr ugha gS rFkk U;kf;d

fofu'p;& 2013[136]FLR-12. ds ekeys ds rF; Hkh gLrxr ekeys ds rF; ls fHkUu gSa] D;ksafd gLRkxr ekeys eas vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e

dh /kkjk&17¼ch-½dk iz'u vUroZfyr ugha gS blfy, gLrxr ekeys ds rF; o ifjfLFkfr ,oa izdze dh fHkUurk ds dkj.k ;s U;kf;d fofu'p; Hkh

vizkFkhZ dks dksbZ enn ugha igqapkrs gSaA

vc tgka rd izkFkhZ deZdkj ds fo}ku izfrfuf/k dk ;g rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ dh voS/k #i ls NaVuh dh xbZ gS] blfy, mls iqu% lsok esa

LFkkfir fd;k tkosA bl rdZ ds laca/k eas tks U;kf;d fofu'p; izkFkhZ ds fo}ku izfrfuf/k dh vksj ls izLrqr fd;s x;s gSa] mudk lEekuiwoZd

ifj'khyu fd;kA vfHkys[k ds ifj'khyu ls ;g Li"V fLFkfr gS fd izkFkhZ deZdkj dk foi{kh cSad esa dksbZ p;fur cksMZ }kjk fof/k vuqlkj p;u ugha

fd;k x;k gS rFkk iklcqd jkbZVj dk in ,d DydZ dk in gksrk gS rFkk DydZ ds in ds fy, fof/k vuqlkj p;u e.My }kjk fu;qfDr dh tkrh

gS rFkk foi{kh cSad ,d yksd midze gS rFkk izkFkhZ dh lsok vof/k Hkh fnuakd 22-8-94 ls 19-7-95 rd jgh gS tks djhc ,d o"kZ dh jgh gS] blfy,

3970

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

izkFkhZ dks lsok esa iquLZFkkiu djus dh ekeys ds rF; o ifjfLFkfr esa dksbZ vkSfpR;rk izrhr ugha gksrh gS] ysfdu izkFkhZ deZdkj dh NaVuh voS/k :i

ls dh xbZ gS] ftlds fy, foi{kh cSad us vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk&25,Q- ds izko/kku dh ikyuk ugha dh gS] blfy, izkFkhZ deZdkj Jh

vukfn dkSf'kd ds dk;Z dh izd`fr dks ns[krs gq, vkSj izkFkhZ }kjk o"kZ 2000 esa odkyr dh lun~ izkIr gksuk vk;k gS] blfy, bu lHkh igyqvksa dks

ns[krs gq, izkFkhZ deZdkj dks crkSj {kfriwfrZ nks yk[k #i;s fnyk;k tkuk ekeys ds rF; o ifjfLFkfr esa mfpr izrhr gksrk gSaA

vr% mijksDr foospu ds QyLo#i bl jsQjsUl dk mRrj fuEu izdkj fn;k tkuk lehphu gS %&

vf/kfu.kZ;

vf/kfu.kZ;

vf/kfu.kZ;

vf/kfu.kZ;

vr % izcU/ku] rRdkyhu cSad vkWQ jktLFkku] t;iqj ds }kjk Jh vukfn dkSf'kd deZdkj dks fnuakd 19-7-95 dks ,d ekg dk uksfVl

osru o NaVuh eqvkotk fn;s cxSj lsok ls i;Zolku fd;k tkuk fof/k lEer ,oa U;k;ksfpr ugha gS rFkk foi{kh cSad }kjk vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e

dh /kkjk&25,Q-ds izko/kku dk vfrya?ku fd;k x;k gS blfy, izkFkhZ deZdkj Jh vukfn dkSf'kd ekeys ds rF; o ifjfLFkfr esa foi{kh cSad ls

crkSj {kfriwfrZ nks yk[k #i;s ikus dk gdnkj gS rFkk ftls foi{kh cSad izkFkhZ dks vokMZ dh frfFk ls N% ekg esa lank; djs rFkk ekeys ds rF; o

ifjfLFkfr esa i{kdkjku [kpkZ viuk& viuk Lo;a ogu djsxsaA

fxjh'k dqekj 'kekZ] U;k;k/kh'k

ubZ fnYyh] 14 ebZ] 2018

dk-vk- 817-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj Hkkjrh; LVsV

cSad çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vfèkdj.k ukxiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 77@2013) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 14-05-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&12012@107@2013&vkbZvkj (ch&I)º

ch-,l- fc"V] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 14th May, 2018

S.O. 817.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 77/2013) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court Nagpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of

India and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 14.05.2018.

[No. L-12012/107/2013-IR (B-I)]

B.S. BISHT, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI S. S. GARG, PRESIDING OFFICER, CGIT-CUM-LABOUR COURT, NAGPUR

Case No.CGIT/NGP/77/2013

Date: 19.01.2018

Party No.1

:

The Asstt. General Manager(Admn.)

State Bank of India, Region-I,

Administrative Office, S.V. Patel Road,

Post Box no. 37, Nagpur-440 001.

Versus

Party No.2

:

Shri Sudhir S/o. Balachandra Deshpande

B-II, C/o. Anand Dongre, Near Renuka

Mandir, Yashodha Nagar,

Nagpur-440 016.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3971

AWARD

(Dated: 19th January, 2018)

In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of section 10 of

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) (“the Act” in short), the Central Government has referred the industrial

dispute between the employers, in relation to the management of State Bank of India and their workman, Shri Sudhir

Deshpande, for adjudication, as per letter No.L-12012/107/2013-IR (B-I) dated 22.01.2014, with the following

schedule:-

“Whether the action of the Assistant General Manager (Administration) State Bank of India, Region-I Nagpur

in imposing the penalty of “Dismissal without notice’ on Shri Sudhir Balchandra Deshpande, Special

Assistant, State Bank of India, Deen Dayal Nagar Branch, Nagpur vide their order dated 25.02.2012, is fair

and legal? To what relief the concerned workman is entitled?”

2.

On receipt of the reference, the parties were noticed to file their respective statement of claim and written

statement and accordingly, the workman, Shri Sudhir Deshpande, (‘the workman” in short), filed the statement of claim

and the management of State Bank of India, (“Party No. 1” in short) filed their written statement.

3.

Both parties argued on preliminary issue as regard to validity of departmental/domestic enquiry before

justification of quantum of punishment as referred in reference order.

4.

The workman Shri Sudhir Balachandra Deshpande stated in claim petition that charge sheet was issued by

management against him and departmental enquiry was conducted against him and he was participated in the

departmental enquiry. As per report of Enquiry Officer, both the charges levelled against him were proved and

Disciplinary Authority dismissed the delinquent from service of Bank w.e.f. 25.02.2012. The workman has filed

appeal before the Appellate Authority but Appellate Authority has also dismissed the appeal. In para 11 and 12 of the

claim, the workman stated that he has no dispute on departmental enquiry and he has accepted all charges levelled in

the charge sheet against him. The workman further stated that in the interest of justice present sentence may kindly be

set aside by substituting the punishment of compulsory retirement from the services of the Bank with superannuation

benefits as Bank has not suffered any loss.

5.

In reply party no.1 submitted that the workman has no allegation against the departmental/domestic enquiry in

his written claim petition. Delinquent misappropriated the amount of Bank and refunded the misappropriated amount.

The workman participated in the enquiry and the departmental enquiry was conducted by following the principles of

natural justice. Charges levelled against delinquent was proved and after giving due opportunity to delinquent. The

workman has also filed appeal before the appellate authority as regard to modification of quantum sentence but the

same was also dismissed.

6.

The party no.1 has stated that Tribunal is empowered to judicial review if departmental enquiry is not

conducted accordance to procedure established in service rules and no procedure of natural justice was followed by the

Enquiry officer. Party no.1 further stated that Tribunal is empowered to interfere only when punishment is shocking

disproportionate to the misconducts and proved under section 11-A of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The workman has

already filed the appeal against punishment only and he has not ever challenged the validity of departmental enquiry at

any stage earlier, hence the workman is estopped to raise the validity of departmental proceeding before the Tribunal.

7.

As this is a case of dismissal of the workman from services, after holding a departmental enquiry, the validity

of the departmental enquiry was taken as a preliminary issue for consideration and by order dated 22.01.2016, the

departmental enquiry conducted against the workman was held to be legal, proper and in accordance with the principles

of natural justice.

8.

On behalf of workman it was argued that the punishment was disproportionate even validity of enquiry was

deemed to be correct. He also argued that workman was in acute financial crises at that point of time due to indebtness

and mother’s illness, who was ultimately treated at Bombay Hospital but died due to heart attack. He also argued that

workman still sustained the said plight and survive in life due to two brilliant children and family he had. He also

argued that workman voluntarily accepted and admitted all charges levelled against him but he prayed just and

reasonable punishments like compulsory retirement from the services of the bank with superannuation benefits in place

of dismissal to meet the end of justice.

9.

On the contrary, on behalf of the management it was argued that all charges against the workman was duly

proved and bank imposed punishment of dismissal without notice as per service condition applicable to the workman.

He also argued that judicial review had limited scope for the Tribunal and Tribunal did not act as appellate court. He

relied on the following case laws:-

UPSRTC Vs. Subhas Chandra Sharma 2000SCC (L&S) 349, Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. Vs. N.B. Narawade

[(2005) 3 SCC 134 = (2005) 2 Scale 392], Union of India Vs. Parma Nanda 1989 SCC (L&S) 303, State of

3972

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Orissa Vs. Bidyabhushan Mohapatra (AIR 1963 SC 779= 1963 Supp 1SCR 648), Union Bank of India Vs.

Vishwa Mohan 1998 (4) SCC 310 = 1998 LIC 2514, SBI Vs. Bela Bagchi 2005 SCC (L&S) 940 and Syed

T.A. Vs. Naqshbandi Vs. State of JK 2003 SCC(L&S) 1151= (2003) 9 SCC 592

9.

Now we see the legal position:- Management’s advocate to support his argument put following case laws :--

State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur Vs Nemichand, Civil Appeal No. 5861 of 2007, SC dated 01.03.2011,

Regional Manager, U.P.S.R.T.C. Vs Hotilal, Civil Appeal No. 5984 of 2000 dated 11.02.2003, State Bank of

India Vs Ramesh Dinkar, Civil Appeal No. 2055 of 2003 dated 11.08.2006, Devendra Kumar Vs State of

Uttaranchal, Civil Appeal No. 1155 of 2006 dated 29.07.2013 and Bharat Forge Company Ltd. Vs A.B.

Zodge, A.I.R. 1996 SC 1556, in which following legal principles are laid down:-

i.

It is now well settled that the courts will not act as an appellate court and reassess the evidence led in the

domestic enquiry, nor interfere on the ground that another view is possible on the material on record.

ii.

Therefore, courts will not interfere with findings of fact recorded in departmental enquires, except where

such findings are based on no evidence or where they are clearly perverse. The test to find out perversity

is to see whether a Tribunal acting reasonably could have arrived at such conclusion or finding, on the

material on record. Courts will however interfere with the findings in disciplinary matters, if principles

of natural justice or statutory regulations have been violated or if the order is found to be arbitrary,

capricious, malafide or based on extraneous considerations.

iii.

When a court is considering whether punishment of ‘termination from service’ imposed upon a bank

employee is shockingly excessive or disproportionate to the gravity of the proved misconduct, the loss

of confidence in the employee will be an important and relevant factor.

iv.

That having regard to the gravity of the established misconduct, the punishing authority had the power

and jurisdiction to impose punishment.

v.

Legal position would establish that the disciplinary authority, and on appeal the appellate authority,

being fact-finding authorities have exclusive power to consider the evidence with a view to maintain

discipline. They are invested with the discretion to impose appropriate punishment keeping in view the

magnitude or gravity of the misconduct.

vi

The position in our country, in administrative law, where no fundamental freedoms as aforesaid are

involved, is that the courts/tribunals will only play a secondary role while the primary judgment as to

reasonableness will remain with the executive or administrative authority.

vii.

Court interfered with the punishment only after coming to the conclusion that the punishment was in

outrageous defiance of logic and was shocking.

viii. If the charged employee holds a position of trust where honesty and integrity are inbuilt requirements of

functioning, it would not be proper to deal with the matter leniently. Misconduct in such cases has to be

dealt with iron hands.

ix.

Misrepresentation itself amounts to fraud, and further held fraudulent misrepresentation is called deceit

and consists in lending a man into damage by willfully or recklessly causing him to believe and act on

falsehood.

x.

If the initial action is not in consonance with law, the subsequent conduct of a party cannot sanctify the

same.

10.

Now I will discuss the evidence with reference to the argument of the workman. Workman in statement of

claim para no. 11 & 12 admitted the proceeding of departmental enquiry conducted against him by the bank and he also

admitted the charges levelled against him. He has nothing to object about the findings given by the enquiry officer. He

also admitted that the copy of enquiry report was also received.

On this admission management counsel relied on the following case law:-

Chairman & Managing Director V.S.P. Vs. Gopal Raju Sri Prabhakara Hari Babu (2008) 2 SCC(L&S) 311

and Himachal Pradesh Road Transport Vs. Hukumchand (2009) 2 SCC (L&S) 615 in which it was held that –

1) “Held, detailed enquiry need not be held- Penalty based on respondent’s admission that he unauthorisedly

absented, was valid in view of the Evidence Act, 1872, S.58”. 2) “Employee’s own admission of misconduct-

Enquiry in such an eventuality, held not necessary- Administrative Law – Natural justice”.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3973

On the perusal of the record it appears that the departmental enquiry was conducted properly and sufficient

opportunity was given to the workman on behalf of the management. In my opinion there was no legal defect in the

departmental enquiry.

11.

As far as quantum of punishment is concerned it is well settled that the disciplinary authority and appellate

authority being the fact finding authority. So this Tribunal is not an appellate authority i.e. Tribunal will only play

secondary roll while the primary judgment as to reasonableness will remain with the executive or administrative

authority. It is also clear from the above case law that jurisdiction of the Tribunal is very limited and its power to

interfere with disciplinary matters is also limited. It is also laid down in the case law that Tribunal cannot set aside a

well reasoned order only on sympathy or sentiments. It is also laid down that the superior court only in some cases

invoke doctrine of proportionality if decision of an employer is found within the legal parameter, the jurisdiction

would ordinarily not be invoked when misconduct stand proved.

12.

In view of the discussion made above and the materials on record, it is found that there is no scope to interfere

with the order of the punishment of dismissal from services passed against the workman. Hence, it is ordered:-

ORDER

The action of the Assistant General Manager (Administration) State Bank of India, Region-I Nagpur in

imposing the penalty of “Dismissal without notice” on Shri Sudhir Balchandra Deshpande, Special Assistant,

State Bank of India, Deen Dayal Nagar Branch, Nagpur vide their order dated 25.02.2012, is fair and legal. The

workman is not entitled to any relief.

S.S. GARG, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 14 ebZ] 2018

dk-vk- 818-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj if'pe jsyos

çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k

vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 527@2004) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 14-05-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&41012@141@2002&vkbZvkj (ch&I)º

ch-,l- fc"V] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 14th May, 2018

S.O. 818.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 527/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Western

Railway and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 14.05.2018.

[No. L-41012/141/2002-IR (B-I)]

B.S. BISHT, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present: Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT cum Labour Court,

Ahmedabad, Dated 15th March, 2018

Reference: (CGITA) No- 527/2004

1. The General Manager,

Western Railway,

Churchgate, Mumbai – 400001

2. The Divisional Mechanical Engineer,

Western Railway, Diesel Loco Shed, Vatva,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380001

3. The Assistant Mechanical Engineer,

Western Railway, Diesel Loco Shed, Vatva,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380001

…First Party

V/s

3974

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Shri Kanti Mana,

C/o Shri J.K. Ved,

Sinduri Mata Devasthan, S.T. Nagar Road,

Godhra (Gujarat) - 389001

…Second Party

For the First Party :

Shri H.B. Shah

For the Second Party :

Shri Hitesh D. Kathrotiya

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-41012/141/

2002–IR(B-I) dated 31.12.2002 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in

respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the Assistant Mechanical Engineer (HR), Western Railway, Vatva, in giving

punishment of removal from service w.e.f. 25.08.2001 to Shri Kanti Mana, DSL Khallasi is justified? If not,

what relief the concerned workman is entitled and from which date?”

1. The reference dates back to 31.12.2002. In response to the notice sent to the parties, the second party workman

submitted the statement of claim Ex. 4 alleging that he was serving in the first party at Diesel Loco Shed,

Vatva, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) on the permanent post of Diesel Khallasi in a grade pay of Rs. 740-940/-. He

served the first party for 10 years with unblemished career but he was served with a charge-sheet on

25.10.2000 charging for absence from duty from 12.07.2000 to 25.11.2000. A copy of the charge-sheet has

been enclosed with the statement of claim. He has further alleged that he was absent from duty for the

aforesaid period due to ill health and family circumstances. He also submitted the medical certificate to this

effect but he was not sanctioned medical leave and terminated from service on 25.08.2001 which was wrong

and illegal. Said termination order is also enclosed with the statement of claim. He submitted an appeal against

the termination letter under discipline and appeal rules on 19.11.2001, the said appeal was also rejected. The

rejection letter is also enclosed with the statement of claim. Thereafter, he moved an appeal before the

appellate authority under Rule 25 of Railway Discipline and Appeal Rules on 01.12.2001 enclosed with the

statement of claim. The said review application was also rejected. He has further alleged that he was a

permanent employee and was entitled for all the benefits of labour laws like accidental and sick leave in the

manner like half pay or leave without pay. The first party might have sanctioned his leave as without pay but

instead of sanctioning the leave, his services were terminated. Thus he has prayed for quashing the termination

order and reinstatement with back wages and consequential benefits.

2. The first parties The Divisional Mechanical Engineer, Western Railway, Diesel Loco Shed, Vatva,

Ahmedabad, submitted the joint written statement Ex. 5 submitting that the tribunal has no jurisdiction to

adjudicate the matter on the ground that the second party workman was a railway servant holding a permanent

post, therefore, termination of his service can only be adjudicated by the Central Administrative Tribunal and

the averments made in the statement of claim are not admitted. He further submitted that under the Railway

Establishment Manual, a person who unauthorisedly absent from duty, the major penalty can be imposed. The

second party workman was working in Diesel Loco Shed, Vatva, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in a scale of Rs. 2550-

3000/- and remained absent from 12.07.2000 to 24.11.2000, therefore, a charge-sheet was issued as Form No.

SF5 as per discipline and local rules. He did not submitted sick certificate of a railway doctor during the

period of absence. An enquiry was held on 22.05.2001, 19.06.2001 and 03.07.2001; same was attended by the

second party workman. After enquiry, the charge was found to be proved. The enquiry report was served on

the second party workman on 03.08.2001. The second party workman did not submit any explanation,

therefore, vide order no. AME/VIA-5/NIP No. P/308/00/5/AME/249 dated 25.08.2001; he was removed from

the service. The second party workman moved an appeal against the said order which was rejected after giving

personal hearing. Thus the prayer made by the second party workman in his statement of claim deserved to be

rejected. All the documents mentioned in the written statement are also enclosed.

3. The second party workman in support of statement of claim and reference, submitted his affidavit Ex. 17 on

03.02.2017 reiterating the averments made in the statement of claim but despite giving number of

opportunities to the first party, the first party did not prefer to cross-examine the second party workman on his

affidavit Ex. 17. It is noteworthy that before permitting the second party to submit his affidavit Ex. 17, the first

party vide order dated 28.09.2011, was asked to submit the documents relating departmental enquiry but

despite giving dozens of opportunities, the first party did not submit the record of discretionary proceedings.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3975

4. The second party has submitted the documents like charge-sheet, punishment order, memorandum of appeal,

rejection order of appeal, memorandum of review on his appeal order, medical certificate of a private doctor

and fitness certificate of the railway doctor.

5. As the first party failed to submit the documents of departmental enquiry, therefore, the reference was

proceeded ex-parte against the first party as none has been responding and appearing from the first party to

explain the reasons of prosecuting the case.

6. Therefore, the second party workman submitted the affidavit Ex. 17 in support of his statement of claim which

is unrebutted.

7. The argument in the written statement that the tribunal has no jurisdiction, is not tenable because the second

party workman was a workman within the definition of Section 2 (s) of the Industrial Dispute Act and his

termination comes within the jurisdiction of this tribunal under Section 2 (c) of the Industrial Dispute Act. The

record reveals that the second party workman submitted a medical certificate issued by a private doctor that he

has been ill from 12.07.2001 to 14.11.2001. The first party has not rebutted this allegation as to why he could

not be sanctioned medical leaves for the aforesaid period, thus the rejection of appeal and also review of it was

unjustified and consequently, the order of termination of his service was unjust and improper.

8. Thus the reference deserves to be allowed. The order of termination of his service is set aside and quashed.

The first party is directed to reinstate the second party workman Kanti Mana with back wages and all

consequential benefits within 60 days from the publication of this award.

9. The award is passed accordingly.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 15 ebZ] 2018

dk-vk- 819-—dsUnz ljdkj] jktHkk"kk (la?k ds 'kkldh; iz;kstuksa ds fy, iz;ksx) fu;e] 1976 (;Fkkla'kksf/r] 1987) ds

fu;e 10 ds mi&fu;e (4) ds vuqlj.k esa] Je vkSj jkstxkj ea=kky; ds iz'kkldh; fu;a=k.kk/hu fuEufyf[kr dk;kZy; dks] ftuds 80

izfr'kr ls vf/d deZpkfj;ksa us fgUnh dk dk;Zlk/d Kku izkIr dj fy;k gS] ,rn~}kjk vf/lwfpr djrh gS%

01- mi&{ks=kh; dk;kZy;] fr#ouariqje

02- deZpkjh jkT; chek fuxe] 'kk[kk dk;kZy;] jkaph

03- deZpkjh jkT; chek fuxe] 'kk[kk dk;kZy;] jkex<+

04- deZpkjh jkT; chek fuxe] 'kk[kk vLirky] vks[kyk

05- deZpkjh jkT; chek fuxe] 'kk[kk dk;kZy;] eksjh xsV

06- deZpkjh jkT; chek fuxe] 'kk[kk dk;kZy;] fd'kuxat

07- deZpkjh jkT; chek fuxe vLirky] fHkokM+h

¹la- bZ&11016@1@2017&jk-Hkk-uh-º

nsosUnz ¯lg] vkfFkZd lykgdkj

New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018

S.O. 819.—In pursuance of Sub-Rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for official purposes of

the Union) Rules, 1976 (as amended, 1987) the Central Government hereby notifies the following office under the

administrative control of the Ministry of Labour & Employment, more than 80% Staff whereof have acquired working

knowledge of Hindi :

01.

Sub-Regional office, Thiruvananthapuram

02.

ESIC, Branch Office, Ranchi

03.

ESIC, Branch Office, Ramgarh

04.

ESIC Hospital, Okhla

05.

ESIC, Branch Office, Mori Gate

06.

ESIC, Branch Office, Kishanganj

07.

ESIC Hospital, Bhiwadi

[No. E-11016/1/2017-RBN)]

DEVENDER SINGH, Economic Adviser

3976

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ubZ fnYyh] 15 ebZ] 2018

dk-vk- 820-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ bZLVuZ

dksyiQhYM fyfeVsM ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 14@2009) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

04-05-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&22012@135@2008&vkbZvkj (lh-,e& II)º

jktsUnz ¯lg] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018

S.O. 820.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 14/2009) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court Asansol, as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s E.C.L., and

their workmen, received by the Central Government on 04.05.2018.

[No. L-22012/135/2008-IR (CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT,

ASANSOL

PRESENT:

Shri Pramod Kumar Mishra, Presiding Officer

REFERENCE NO. 14 OF 2009

PARTIES :

The management of Dhemomain Group of M/s. ECL

V/s

Shri Ranjit Roy

REPRESENTATIVES :

For the Management

:

Shri P. K. Goswami, Learned Advocate

For the Union (Workman) :

Shri S. K. Pandey, Learned Union Representative

INDUSTRY : COAL

STATE : WEST BENGAL

Dated : 19.04.2018

A W A R D

In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-section (1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947), Govt. of India through the Ministry of Labour vide its letter NO. L-22012/

135/2008–IR (CM-II) dated 06.03.2009 has been pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by this

Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

“ Whether the action of the management of M/s. ECL in dismissing Shri Ranjit Roy, w.e.f. 17.10..2005 is legal

and justified? To what relief is the workman entitled?”

————

1. Having received the Order NO. L-22012/135/2008–IR (CM-II) dated 06.03.2009 of the above said reference

from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a Reference Case No.

14 of 2009 was registered on 27.03.2009. Accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue notices

through the registered post to the parties concerned, directing them to appear in the court, on the date fixed

and to file their written statements along with the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support of their

claims. In pursuance of the said order notices by the registered post were sent to the parties concerned. Both

the parties appeared in the Tribunal, through their representative.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3977

2. Case called out. Shri P. K. Goswami, learned advocate appeared on behalf of the management of Dhemomain

Group of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited and Shri S. K. Pandey, Learned union representative appeared on

behalf of the workman, Shri Ranjit Roy.

3. Shri S. K. Pandey, Learned union representative of the workman, Shri Ranjit Roy files a petition that the

management of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has agreed to re-instate the workman, Shri Ranjit Roy, hence

he is not interested to proceed with the case further and the case may be closed. He also made an endorsement

on the order sheet to that effect. Since the workman does not want to contest the case anymore ‘no dispute’

exists between the parties and I have no option left but to close the case. As such the case is closed and

accordingly a ‘No Dispute Award’ is hereby passed.

O R D E R

Let an “Award” be and the same is passed as per above discussion. Send the copies of the order to the Govt. of

India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for information and needful. The reference is accordingly disposed of.

PRAMOD KUMAR MISHRA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 15 ebZ] 2018

dk-vk- 821-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ Mcyw-

lh-,y- ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vfèkdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] ukxiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 14@2014) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 10-05-2018 dks

çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&22012@121@2013&vkbZvkj (lh-,e&II)º

jktsUnz ¯lg] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018

S.O. 821.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 14/2014) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Nagpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s W.C.L. and

their workmen, received by the Central Government on 10.05.2018.

[No. L-22012/121/2013-IR (CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI J.P.CHAND, PRESIDING OFFICER, CGIT-CUM-LABOUR COURT, NAGPUR

Case No. CGIT/NGP/14/2014-15

Date: 05.12.2017

Party No.1(a)

:

The Sub Area Manager,

Rajur Sub Area of Wani North Area,

WCL, Post: Rajur,

Tehsil: Wani, Distt. Yavatmal,

Yavatmal (M.S.)

Party No.1(b) :

The General Manager,

Wani North Area, Western Coalfields Limited,

Post: Bhalar, Tehsil: Wani,

Distt. Yavatmal (M.S.),

Yavatmal.

Versus

Party No.2

:

The President,

Koyla Shramik Sabha (HMS), Wani North Area,

Ward No. 1, Tilaknagar, At. Wani,

Post: Wani, Distt. Yavatmal (M.S.),

Yavatmal.

3978

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

AWARD

(Dated: 5th December, 2017)

In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of section 10 of

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) (“the Act” in short), the Central Government has referred the industrial

dispute between the employers, in relation to the management of Western Coalfields Limited and their union, Koyla

Shramik Sabha (HMS) for adjudication, as per letter No.L-22012/121/2013- (IR(CM-II) dated 21.07.2014, with the

following schedule:-

“Whether the action of the management of Rajur Sub Area of Wani North Area, Western Coalfields Limited

(WCL), Tehsil. Wani, Distt. Yavatmal(M.S.) of converting Piece Rated Workers to the Time Rated Worker is

legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workmen are entitled to?”

2.

On receipt of the reference, the parties were noticed to file their respective statement of claim and written

statement, by registered post with acknowledge due.

The party No.1 appeared through their advocates on 19.12.2014.

In spite of sufficient service of notice on the petitioner, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. No

statement of claim was also filed on 05.12.2017even after second notice was served for the date of 05.12.2017.

Petitioner did not appear even today. So, case is closed for award.

.It is well settled that whenever a party challenges the legality of an order, the burden lies upon him to prove

the illegality of the order and it is imperative for him to file written statement before the Industrial Court setting out

grounds on which the order is challenged and he must also produce evidence to prove his case. If the party fails to

appear or file written statement or produce evidence, the dispute referred by the Government cannot be answered in

favour of the said party and the party would not be entitled to any relief.

Judging the present case with the touch stone of the settled principles as mentioned above, it is found that the

petitioner has neither appeared nor filed any statement of claim and as such, he is not entitled to any relief. Hence, it is

ordered:-

ORDER

The reference is answered in the negative and against the petitioner. The petitioner is not entitled to any

relief.

SHYAM SUNDER GARG, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 15 ebZ] 2018

dk-vk- 822-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ bZLVuZ

dksyiQhYM fyfeVsM ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 24@1993) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

10-05-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&22012@49@1993&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º

jktsUnz ¯lg] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018

S.O. 822.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 24/1993) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Asansol, as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s E.C.L.,

and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 10.05.2018.

[No. L-22012/49/1993-IR (CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3979

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT,

ASANSOL

PRESENT :

Shri Pramod Kumar Mishra, Presiding Officer

REFERENCE NO. 24 OF 1993

PARTIES :

The management of Kalipahari (R) Colliery of M/s. ECL

V/s

Smt. Ch. Kajali Kora

REPRESENTATIVES :

For the management

:

Shri P. K. Das, Learned Advocate

For the union (Workman) :

Shri S. K. Pandey, Learned Union Representative

INDUSTRY: COAL

STATE : WEST BENGAL

Dated : 24.04.2018

A W A R D

In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-section(1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947), Govt. of India through the Ministry of Labour vide its letter NO. L-22012/

49/93–IR(C-II) dated 07.06.1993 has been pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by this

Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

“ Whether the action of the management of Kalipahari (R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Ltd.,

in dismissing Smt. Ch. Kajali Kora, Wagon Loader w.e.f. 28.10.1988 from services vide Charge Sheet No.

AGT/KPH/87/1138 dated 15.07.1987 is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled to? ”

________

1. Having received the Order NO. L-22012/49/93–IR(C-II) dated 07.06.1993 of the above said reference from

the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a Reference Case No. 24 of

1993 was registered on 14.06.1993. Accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through the

registered post to the parties concerned, directing them to appear in the court, on the date fixed and to file their

written statements along with the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In

pursuance of the said order notices by the registered post were sent to the parties concerned. Both the parties

appeared in the Tribunal, through their representative.

2. The workman Smt. Ch. Kajali Kora has filed written statement through union representative. Smt. Ch. Kajali

Kora has alleged in her written statement that she was regular employee working as General Mazdoor at

Ghusick Unit of Kalipahari (R) Colliery under Sripur Area of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited. She was absent

from 11.07.1985. She was charge sheeted on 15.07.1987 after 2 (Two) years. The enquiry has been conducted

without observing any procedure laid down in the standing order applicable to the workman. She was not

given full opportunity to defend herself. The workman being illiterate are not aware about standing order.

Absenteeism in coal industry is general phenomenon. The punishment of dismissal is shocking and excessive.

Dismissal of permanent workman from establishment without proper enquiry is illegal and unfair. The

workman belongs to Scheduled Cast Community. The workman has prayed that she should be re-instated in

service of the company with immediate effect with full back wages from 11.07.1985 till resumption of duty.

3.

The Agent of Kalipahari (R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has filed written statement. He has

alleged that the reference is not maintainable in law as well as on facts. The workman was an employee

Ghusick Unit of Kalipahari (R) Colliery under Sripur Area of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited. The permanent

address has been recorded in Form ‘B’ register. The workman absented herself from 11.07.1985 but when

workman failed to resume his duty Charge Sheet dated 15.07.1987 was issued to her for her absence form duty

without notice and without leave. Notice was issued on the recorded address with A/D. The concerned

workman did not submit any reply to the aforesaid Charge Sheet. The worker was avoiding to submit her

reply. The management decided to hold departmental enquiry and appointed Shri R. Sinha, Senior Personnel

3980

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Officer. The Enquiry Officer sent notice of enquiry on registered postal address to workman but the workman

did not appear. The Enquiry Officer for giving opportunity to the workman adjourned the enquiry proceeding

for 3 (Three) successive dates and again sent registered notice but the concerned workman did not appear in

the enquiry proceeding. The Enquiry Officer had no other alternative, proceeded ex-parte enquiry. The

concerned workman has been guilty of the charge of misconduct as defined under the standing order. The

competent authority accepted the Enquiry Report and was pleased to dismiss the workman on 28.10.1988. The

Agent of Kalipahari (R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has prayed that the workman is not

entitled to any relief.

4.

The Agent of Kalipahari (R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has filed rejoinder written statement.

He has denied all the allegation of the workman Smt. Ch. Kajali Kora.

5.

Workman has filed the following documentary evidences :

(i) Photocopy of the Charge Sheet, (ii) Photocopy of the Enquiry Proceeding, (iii) Photocopy of the statement

of witnesses, (iv) Photocopy of the Postal Receipts, and (v) Photocopy of the Enquiry Report. Workman has

examined Shri S. K. Pandey, union representative as WW-1 but he has not been cross-examined by the

management of Kalipahari (R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited. The management of Kalipahari

(R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has filed the copy of death certificate of Smt. Ch. Kajali Kora

and examined the witness of Shri Gopal Gope.

6. The learned advocate of Kalipahari (R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has filed Death Certificate

of Smt. Ch. Kajali Kora on 17.07.2017, copy has been given to Shri S. K. Pandey, learned union

representative. But he has not filed any objection to this Death Certificate. Though ample opportunity has been

provided to the union representative. Smt. Ch. Kajali Kora has expired on 04.05.1997 though information has

been submitted to the tribunal so late.

7. Since, the workman Smt. Ch. Kajali Kora has expired the reference is abated. Smt. Ch. Kajali Kora (deceased)

is not entitled to any relief.

O R D E R

Let an “Award” be and the same is passed as per above discussion. Send the copies of the order to the Govt. of

India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for information and needful. The reference is accordingly disposed of.

PRAMOD KUMAR MISHRA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 15 ebZ] 2018

dk-vk- 823-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ bZLVuZ

dksyiQhYM fyfeVsM ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 25@1993) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

10-05-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&22012@47@1993&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º

jktsUnz ¯lg] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018

S.O. 823.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 25/1993) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Asansol, as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s E.C.L.,

and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 10.05.2018.

[No. L-22012/47/1993-IR (CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT,

ASANSOL

PRESENT :

Shri Pramod Kumar Mishra, Presiding Officer

REFERENCE NO. 25 OF 1993

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3981

PARTIES :

The management of Kalipahari (R) Colliery of M/s. ECL

V/s

Shri Hopna Majhi

REPRESENTATIVES :

For the management

:

Shri P. K. Das, Learned Advocate

For the union (Workman) :

Shri S. K. Pandey, Learned Union Representative

INDUSTRY: COAL

STATE : WEST BENGAL

Dated : 25.04.2018

A W A R D

In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-section(1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947), Govt. of India through the Ministry of Labour vide its letter NO. L-22012/

47/93–IR(CM-II) dated 07.06.1993 has been pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by this

Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

“ Whether the action of the management of Kalipahari (R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Ltd., in

dismissing Shri Hopna Majhi, M. C. Loader w.e.f. 28.10.1988 from services vide Charge Sheet No.

AGT/KPH/87/1102 dated 11.07.1987 is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled to? ”

________

1. Having received the Order NO. L-22012/47/93–IR(CM-II) dated 07.06.1993 of the above said reference from

the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a Reference Case No. 25 of

1993 was registered on 14.06.1993. Accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through the

registered post to the parties concerned, directing them to appear in the court, on the date fixed and to file their

written statements along with the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In

pursuance of the said order notices by the registered post were sent to the parties concerned. Both the parties

appeared in the Tribunal, through their representative.

2. The workman Shri Hopna Majhi has filed written statement through union representative. Shri Hopna Majhi

has alleged in his written statement that he was regular employee working as General Mazdoor at Ghusick

Unit of Kalipahari (R) Colliery under Sripur Area of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited. He was absent from

19.06.1982. He was charge sheeted on 11.07.1987 after 5 (Five) years. The enquiry has been conducted

without observing any procedure laid down in the standing order applicable to the workman. He was not given

full opportunity to defend himself. The workman being illiterate are not aware about standing order.

Absenteeism in coal industry is general phenomenon. The punishment of dismissal is shocking and excessive.

Dismissal of permanent workman from establishment without proper enquiry is illegal and unfair. The

workman belongs to Scheduled Cast Community. The workman has prayed that he should be re-instated in

service of the company with immediate effect with full back wages from 19.06.1982 till resumption of duty.

3. The Agent of Kalipahari (R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has filed written statement. He has

alleged that the reference is not maintainable in law as well as on facts. The workman was an employee

Ghusick Unit of Kalipahari (R) Colliery under Sripur Area of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited. The permanent

address has been recorded in Form ‘B’ register. The workman absented himself from 19.06.1982 but when

workman failed to resume his duty Charge Sheet dated 11.07.1987 was issued to his for his absence form duty

without notice and without leave. Notice was issued on the recorded address with A/D. The concerned

workman did not submit any reply to the aforesaid Charge Sheet. The worker was avoiding to submit his

reply. The management decided to hold departmental enquiry and appointed Shri R. Sinha, Senior Personnel

Officer. The Enquiry Officer sent notice of enquiry on registered postal address to workman but the workman

did not appear. The Enquiry Officer for giving opportunity to the workman adjourned the enquiry proceeding

for 3 (Three) successive dates and again sent registered notice but the concerned workman did not appear in

the enquiry proceeding. The Enquiry Officer had no other alternative, proceeded ex-parte enquiry. The

concerned workman has been guilty of the charge of misconduct as defined under the standing order. The

competent authority accepted the Enquiry Report and was pleased to dismiss the workman on 28.10.1988. The

Agent of Kalipahari (R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has prayed that the workman is not

entitled to any relief.

3982

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

4. The Agent of Kalipahari (R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has filed rejoinder written statement.

He has denied all the allegation of the workman Shri Hopna Majhi.

5. Workman has filed the following documentary evidences :

(i) Photocopy of the Charge Sheet, (ii) Photocopy of the Enquiry Proceeding, (iii) Photocopy of the statement

of witnesses, (iv) Photocopy of the Postal Receipts, and (v) Photocopy of the Enquiry Report. The workman

has examined Shri S. K. Pandey, union representative as ww-1 but he has not been cross-examined by the

management of Kalipahari (R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited. The management of Kalipahari

(R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has filed the copy of death certificate of Shri Hopna Majhi and

examined the witness of Shri Brahmanandan Jha.

6. The learned advocate of Kalipahari (R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has filed Death Certificate

of Shri Hopna Majhi, copy has been given to Shri S. K. Pandey, learned union representative. But he has not

filed any objection to this Death Certificate. Though ample opportunity has been provided to the union

representative. Shri Hopna Majhi has expired on 20.04.2002 though information has been submitted to the

tribunal so late.

7. Since, the workman Shri Hopna Majhi has expired the reference is abated. Shri Hopna Majhi (deceased) is not

entitled to any relief.

O R D E R

Let an “Award” be and the same is passed as per above discussion. Send the copies of the order to the Govt. of

India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for information and needful. The reference is accordingly disposed of.

PRAMOD KUMAR MISHRA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 15 ebZ] 2018

dk-vk- 824-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ Mcyw-

lh-,y- ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vfèkdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] ukxiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 47@2015) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 10-05-2018 dks

çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&22012@110@2015&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º

jktsUnz ¯lg] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018

S.O. 824.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 47/2015) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Nagpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. W.C.L.,

and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 10.05.2018.

[No. L-22012/110/2015-IR (CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI SHYAM SUNDER GARG, PRESIDING OFFICER, CGIT-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

NAGPUR

Case No.CGIT/NGP/47/2015-16

Date: 10.01.2018

Party No.1

:

The General Manager,

Wani North Area, WCL,

Post: Bhalar, Tehsil: Wani,

Distt. Yavatmal (M.S.) – 445304.

Versus

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3983

Party No.2

:

The Working President,

Koyla Shramik Sabha (HMS),

Ward No. 1, Tilaknagar, Wani,

Tehsil: Wani, Distt. Yavatmal,

Yavatmal (M.S.) 445304

AWARD

(Dated: 10th January, 2018)

In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of section 10 of

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) (“the Act” in short), the Central Government has referred the industrial

dispute between the employers, in relation to the management of Western Coalfields Limited and their union, Koyla

Shramik Sabha (HMS), for adjudication, as per letter No.L-22012/110/2015-IR(CM-II) dated 20.01.2016, with the

following schedule:-

“Whether the demands raised by Shri Sukhranjan Nikunj Biswas, applicant for correction in date of birth on

the bass of School Certificate or sending his case to Medical Board for determination of his age and the

demands supported by the Working President, Koyla Shramik Sabha (HMS), at Wani, Yavatmal is just, fair &

legal? If yes, to what relief the concerned workman is entitled?”?”

2.

On receipt of the reference, the parties were noticed to file their respective statement of claim and written

statement, by registered post with acknowledge due. On 16.03.2016, advocate for the workman and management, both

were present and filed vakalatnama but petitioner did not file statement of claim. Even fresh notice was issued fixing

the case on 06.12.2017, but nobody was present on behalf of the workman even the workman was not present nor he

filed statement of claim. Thereafter case was adjourned to 10.101.2018 but today also, nobody was present nor filed

statement of claim on behalf of the petitioner. It shows that, workman is not interested to continue this case.

It is well settled that whenever a party challenges the legality of an order, the burden lies upon him to prove

the illegality of the order and it is imperative for him to file written statement before the Industrial Court setting out

grounds on which the order is challenged and he must also produce evidence to prove his case. If the party fails to

appear or file written statement or produce evidence, the dispute referred by the Government cannot be answered in

favour of the said party and the party would not be entitled to any relief.

Judging the present case with the touch stone of the settled principles as mentioned above, it is found that the

petitioner has neither appeared nor filed any statement of claim and as such, he is not entitled to any relief. Hence, it is

ordered:-

ORDER

The reference is answered in the negative and against the workman. The workman is not entitled to any

relief.

SHYAM SUNDER GARG, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 15 ebZ] 2018

dk-vk- 825-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ Mcyw-

lh-,y- ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vfèkdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] ukxiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 35@2012) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 10-05-2018 dks

çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&22012@230@2012&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º

jktsUnz ¯lg] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018

S.O. 825.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 35/2012) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Nagpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. W.C.L.,

and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 10.05.2018.

[No. L-22012/230/2012-IR (CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

3984

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI S.S. GARG, PRESIDING OFFICER, CGIT-CUM-LABOURT COURT, NAGPUR

Case No.CGIT/NGP/35/2012

Date: 11.01.2018.

Party No.1

:

The Sub Area Manager,

Durgapur O/C Mines Sub Area of

Chandrapur Area, WCL, Post: Durgapur,

Distt. Chandrapur (M.S.).

Versus

Party No.2

:

The General Secretary, RCMC,

C/o Shri C.R. Terbhre, Near Ayyappa Mandir,

Tukum Ward No. 2,

Tukum, Chandrapur,

Chandrapur (M.S.)

AWARD

(Dated: 11th January, 2018)

In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of section 10 of

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) (“the Act” in short), the Central Government has referred the industrial

dispute between the employers, in relation to the management of Western Coalfields Limited and their union The

General Secretary, RCMC for adjudication, as per letter No.L-22012/230/2012-IR (CM-II) dated 16.01.2013, with the

following schedule:-

“Whether the action of Magmt. Of Durgapur Open Cast Mines sub Area of Chandrapur Area of

Western coalfields Ltd. of dismissal in respect of Shri Pocham Rajam Pairkawar is leal and justified? If not, to

what relief is the workman entitled to?”

On behalf of the workman, union representative, Mr. Dubey is present.

On behalf of the management, Advocate, A.S. Mehadia is present.

Hon’ble High Court in Writ Petition No. 6232/2014 passed an order dated 24.06.2016 in favour of the

management ad Hon’ble High Court quashed this reference. So, this case is not maintainable and parties are directed

that, this reference is dismissed as per direction of the Hon’ble High Court.

Inform the Ministry for necessary action and file is closed and registered with result in concerned register.

S. S. GARG, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 15 ebZ] 2018

dk-vk- 826-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ ,e-

lh-,y- ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vfèkdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] Hkqous'oj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 38@2011) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 08-05-2018

dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&22012@111@2011&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º

jktsUnz ¯lg] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018

S.O. 826.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 38/2011) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Bhubaneswar as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s

M.C.L., and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 08.05.2018.

[No. L-22012/111/2011-IR (CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3985

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT BHUBANESWAR

PRESENT:

Shri B.C. Rath, Presiding Officer,

C.G.I.T.-cum-Labour Court, Bhubaneswar.

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 38/2011

L-22012/111/2011 -IR(CM-II), dated 02.08.2011

Date of Passing Order – 11th April, 2018

BETWEEN:

1. The Chief General Manager,

Bharatpur Area of MCL

At-Mahendrapur, Bharatpur Colliery,

Angul, Odisha.

2. The Chief General Manager,

Hingula Area of MCL,

At-Mahendrapur, Bharatpur Colliery,

Angul, Odisha

…1st Party-Managements.

AND

The General Secretary,

Talcher Coal Mines Employees Union,

At-Qr. No. IB-103, PO-South Balanda,

Angul, Odisha.

…2nd Party-Union.

APPEARANCES:

None

…

For the 1st Party-Managements

None

…

For the 2nd Party-Union

ORDER

Authorized representative of the Management is present. No-one appears on behalf of the 2nd party-Union on

repeated calls. It is found from the record that despite notice to the 2nd party-Union by Regd. Post it fails to take any

step. It is pertinent to mention here that an exparte award passed on 11.12.2014 has been set aside by this tribunal vide

its order dated 23.12.2016. After such setting aside the exparte award the 2nd party-Union was noticed to make his

appearance and to contest the reference. As no one appears on behalf of the Union and as no evidence is led by the

Union in support of the pleadings advanced in the statement of claim, I am inclined to return the reference without its

adjudication due to the absence of evidence from the side of the Union.

Dictated and corrected by me.

B.C. RATH, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 15 ebZ] 2018

dk-vk- 827-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ Mcyw-

lh-,y- ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vfèkdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] ukxiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 109@2002) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 10-05-2018

dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&22012@196@2000&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º

jktsUnz ¯lg] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

3986

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018

S.O. 827.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 109/2002) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Nagpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s W.C.L., and

their workmen, received by the Central Government on 10.05.2018.

[No. L-22012/196/2000-IR (CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI S.S GARG, PRESIDING OFFICER, CGIT-CUM-LABOUR COURT, NAGPUR

Case No.CGIT/NGP/109/2002

Date: 27.03.2018.

Party No.1 : The Sub Area Manager

Hindustan Lalpeth Open Cast Sub Area of WCL,

Post- Lalpeth, Chandrapur (MS).

V/s.

Party No.2 : The General Secretary,

Koyla Shramik Sabha (HMS),

C/o. C.J. Khandre, Near Mahakali Mandir, Chandrapur (MS)

ORDER

In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of section 10 of

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) (“the Act” in short), the Central Government has referred the industrial

dispute for adjudication between the management of Western Coalfields Limited and the General Secretary, Koyla

Shramik Sabha (HMS) vide letter No.L-22012/196/2000-IR(CM-II) dated 19.10.2010, on the following schedule:-

“Whether the action of the management of Hindustan Lalpeth Open Cast of WCL, Post Lalpeth, Distt.

Chandrapur innot protecting wages of Shri Ramayan Sukhalu and Shri Gouri Shankar Bhaddu, Dumper

operators, Hindustan Lalpeth Open Cast of WCL is Legal, proper and justified? If not, to what relief the

workmen are entitled to?”

2.

On receipt of this reference statement of claim and rejoinder filed by the petitioner and written statement filed

by the party no.1.

On behalf of the petitioner evidence is produced. The statement of Mr. Gauri Shankar, Chandrakant Khandre

was recorded on behalf of the petitioner. But on behalf of the party no.1 evidence on affidavit of Mr. K. Raja

Prabhakaran was filed. On behalf of petitioner LRs of Gaurishankar and Ramayan Sukalu filed two applications for

withdrawal of this reference. Mr Gaurishankar Bhaddu was dead and his LRs are recorded in statement of claim. On

this application heard both the parties. On behalf of management no objection was filed. Petitioner Mr. Ramayan

Sukalu and LRs of Mr. Gaurishankar Bhaddu was identified by Mr. Rakesh Shinde, Tripman of Chandrapur Area.

Now application is accepted and permission of withdrawal is allowed.

Hence, it is ordered:-

ORDER

The application for withdrawal of the case is allowed. The case is treated as withdrawn. The

application filed by the Party No. 2 for withdrawal of the case is made part of the order. The reference is

answered in the negative and against the petitioner. The petitioner is not entitled to any relief.

S.S. GARG, Presiding Officer

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3987

ubZ fnYyh] 18 ebZ] 2018

dk-vk- 828-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eS-

vksjhfVdks fy- ,oa vU; cSadksa ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] Hkqous'oj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 01@2006) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh;

ljdkj dks 18-05-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&12011@81@2005&vkbZvkj (ch&II)º

jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 18th May, 2018

S.O. 828.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 01/2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Bhubaneswar as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s

ORITCO Ltd. & other Banks, and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 18.05.2018.

[No. L-12011/81/2005-IR (B-II)]

RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT BHUBANESWAR

PRESENT:

Shri B.C. Rath, Presiding Officer,

C.G.I.T.-cum-Labour Court, Bhubaneswar.

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 01/2006

Date of Passing Award – 16th April, 2018

BETWEEN:

1. The Chairman-cum-M.D.,

Industrial Development Bank of India, IDBI Tower,

WTC Complex, Cuffe Parade, Mumbai-400 005.

2. The Chief Executive, ORITCO Ltd.,

A/130, Sahid Nagar, Bhubaneswar, Orissa.

3(a)The ICICI Ltd., Mumbai.

3(b)The CMD, IFCI, New Delhi.

3(c)The MD, IPIOL, Bhubaneswar.

3(d)The MD, OSICL, Cuttack.

3(e)The MD, OSFCL, Cuttack.

3(f)The Secretary, Industries Deptt.,

Govt. of Orissa, Bhubaneswar.

3(g)The CGM, SBI, Bhubaneswar.

3(h)The AGM, Bank of India, Mumbai

3(i)The CMD, UCO Bank, Kolkatta.

3(j)The Chairman, Andhra Bank, Hyderabad.

3(k)The Jt. Secretary, Banking Division,

M/o. Finance, Govt. of India, New Delhi

… 1st Party-Managements.

(And)

The General Secretary,

ORITCO Staff Association,

A/130. Sahid Nagar, Bhubaneswar-751 007.

…2nd Party-Union.

APPEARANCES:

M/s. K.N. Mishra, Advocate

…

For the 1st Party-Management No. 1.

None.

...

For the 1st Party-

Mgts. No. 2 to 3(a, d, e, f, h, k)

3988

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

M/s. S. Mishra, Advocate.

...

For the 1st Party-

Mgts. No. 3(g) & 3(i)

Shri Bipin Kumar Ekka,

...

For the 1st Party-

Sr. Manager –HR

Management No. 3(j).

M/s. N.K. Mohanty, Adv.

...

For the 1st Party-

Management No. 3(b).

M/s. B.K. Mohanty, Adv.

...

For the 1st Party-Mgt. No. 3(c).

Shri Lingaraj Parida,

…

For the 2nd Party-

General Secretary.

Union.

AWARD

The award arises out of a reference made by the Ministry of Labour, Government of India vide letter

No. L-12011/81/2005–IR(B-II), dated 20.12.2005 in exercising its authority conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1)

and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (herein after referred to as “The Act”) as a

dispute arose between the ORITCO Staff Association and the management of IDBI and ORITCO Ltd (herein after

referred to as “The Compay”). The schedule of reference is as follows:-

“Whether the action of the management of Industrial Development Bank of India (IDBI) and other share

holders of ORITCO in not paying the statutory dues and service benefits of the employees of the ORITCO who

have rendered continuous service for several years to the organization represented by the ORITCO Staff

Association, Bhubaneswar is legal and justified? If not what relief the workmen are entitled to?”

2.

Briefly stated the case of the Union as emerges from its statement of claim, is that ORITCO company is a

public limited company established in the year 1976 being funded by IDBI and other Banks and financial institutions

like Andhra Bank, State Bank of India, UCO Bank, IFCI, ICICI, Bank of India IPICOL, OSIC. The management of

company was being looked after by a Board of Directors consisting of 12 members. The IDBI having 51% of share in

the said company had five members including the post of Chairman and Managing Director in the said Board of

Directors. Nominees of other financial institutions and State Governments were also in the said Board of Directors. The

Board of Directors being policy makers are responsible for day to day administration and the management of the

company. The company was having 50 employees for managing day to day work. It was engaged to identify Potential

Entrepreneurs, prepare project profile and feasibility reports, undertake Techno Economic Feasibility Report, undertake

Market Research & Surveys, Industrial Management & Financial consultancy, project supervision and technical

assistance, Any type of research, Environmental Impact Studies, and any other training programmes etc. The service

rule of the employee of the company was introduced with the approval of the Board of Directors and the workmen

employed in the company have formed its union as named above which has been duly registered under the Trade

Unions Act, 1926 and recognized by the Management of the company. The employees of the company have been

rendering their job uninterruptedly, continuously and sincerely for last several years and none of them has been ever

charge-sheeted for any misconduct and they have served the establishment to its best satisfaction. But, the

Management of the company including the management of IDBI and other financial institutions failed to take up the

responsibilities of their financial obligations for which the employees of the company did not receive their

wages/salaries and other service benefits like medical reimbursement, leave encashment, yearly increment provident

fund etc. for certain periods. Hence, the 2nd party-Union had placed its grievances before the Managements of IDBI and

other financial institution so as to enable the company to make payment of the statutory dues to its employees. It is the

pleading and stand of the 2nd party-Union that the Management of IDBI and other financial institutions having different

proportionate shares in the company as well as proportionate representations in the Board of Directors are statutorily

duty bound and responsible for making payment of arrear wages and other service benefits to the employees of the

company. When the IDBI and other financial institutions paid a deaf ear to the demand of the 2nd party-Union, a dispute

was raised before the labour machinery resulting in the present reference.

3.

The management of IDBI has contested the claim of the Union denying its liability to make payment of arrear

wages and service benefits to the employees of the company. In its written statement it has been pleaded that IDBI is a

separate legal entity than the company and being a financial institution it had a limited promotional role in the

formation of the company. It has no role in the day to day management, affairs, business and operation of the company.

Its role was restricted to the act of investor/share holder. In the capacity of share-holder it had nominated some

members to the Board. Some other financial institutions having shares in the company have also appointed their

nominees as members of the said Board. The role of the nominees was restricted to the discussion in policy matters

placed before it by the Management of the company and to take decisions on those matters. The ORITICO company

was managed by a team of independent professionals and other supportive staffs having no connections with the

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3989

management of IDBI and other financial institutions. There was no “employer and employee” relationship between the

staffs of the company and IDBI or other financial institutions. It has no control or supervisory power in the selection

and recruitment of Executives and staffs of the company as well as fixation of their wages/salaries and service

conditions. There is also no contract between the IDBI and the employees of the company or the Management of the

said company so as to fasten the Management of IDBI to make payment of wages and service benefits to the

employees. Thus, it has no legal or moral obligation for unpaid salaries and service benefits of the employees except its

liability or obligation limited to the extent of unpaid shares, if any. It has, further, taken a stand that having transferred

it’s shares in favour of SIDBI and withdrawn its nominees from the Board of Directors since long it has no liability or

obligation to the demand of the 2nd party-Union. The Management of ORITCO having failed to make its appearance in

the reference inspite of sufficiency of notice has been duly set exparte. It is pertinent to mention here that at the

instance of the 2nd party-Union other financial institutions i.e. IFCI, IPICOL, State Bank of India, Andhra Bank, UCO

Bank have been impleaded in the case. All of them have also contested the claim of the Union filing their separate

written statements taking almost similar stand taken by the Management of the IDBI.

4.

On the aforesaid pleadings of the parties the following issues have been settled for a just and proper

adjudication of the dispute.

I S S U E S

1. Whether the action of the Management of Industrial Development Bank of India (IDBI) and other share

holders of ORITCO in not paying the statutory dues and service benefits of the employees of the ORITCO

who have rendered continuous service for several years to the organization represented by the ORITCO Staff

Association, Bhubaneswar is legal and justified?

2. Whether the reference is bad for non-joinder and mis-joinder of parties?

3. Whether the 2nd party Union has any locustandi to put forth any claim against the 1st Party-Managements?

4. If not, to what relief the workmen are entitled?

5. The 2nd party-Union has examined three witness namely Shri Bhikiari Charan Tripathy, Shri Kartik Charan

Dehury, and Shri Lingaraj Parida, who are stated to be the staff of the company and filed copy of the

Memorandum of Articles of Association, copies of the letters from IDBI to ORITCO issued on different dates,

copy of the ORITCO Staff Rules, copy of the letter from ORITCO for reorganization to ORITCO Staff

Association on dated 4.8.1983, copies of the appointment orders of workmen, copies of three agreements

between the ORITCO Management and ORITCO Association, copy of the letter of te Union to the

Management and other share holders on different dates, copy of the Award passed in I.D. Case No. 8/2000

passed by the Industrial Tribunal, copy of the order passed in Misc. Case No. 428/95, copy of the written

statement filed in I.D. Case No. 8/2000, copy of the proceeding of the meeting presided by the Government in

Industries Deptt, copies of the revital plant of ORITCO and letters to IDBI and other share holders, copy of

the letter of IDBI for transfer of share to SIDBI on 31.7.2009 & 25.11.2009, copy of the list of ORITCO

Board of Directors invited to last board meeting on 27.08.2002 which are marked as Ext.-1 to Ext.-15 in

support of the pleadings advanced in the statement of claim. Per contra, the Managements of IDBI, State Bank

of India, UCO Bank, Andhra Bank, IPICOL and have examined one witness each to refute the allegations

raised in the claim statement of the Union.

6. Since the issues are inter-linked to each other they are taken into consideration simultaneously for the sake of

convenience.

It is apparent from the pleadings and evidence of the parties that the company of ORITCO has separate legal

entity than the Management of IDBI and other financial institutions who are stated to be the share-holders of

the company. There is no serious dispute that the ORITCO is a public limited company and an Undertakings

of the Government of Odisha. It is also emerging from the evidence of the parties and cross examination of

W.Ws that none of the employees of the ORITCO was appointed by any of the share holders including the

Management of IDBI. The 1st Party-Managements except the company have neither any supervisory role in

the day to day work of the company nor the employees of the company were ever working under the

supervision and control of those Management-Banks. W.W-1 has further admitted that the company was filing

its return separately before the Registrar of the Companies. He admits that liability of the share-holders with

regard to profit and loss of the company is confined only to the dividends. The M.D. of the company was the

appointing authority of the disputant workmen. He admits to have worked under the management of the

company and not under any share-holders. It is elicited from their cross examination that one of the workmen

was retrenched earlier and he was reinstated. Usually suspension/dismissal/retrenchment of the workmen of

the company was not made on approval of the share-holders. It is emerging from his cross examination and

cross examination of other witnesses that on earlier occasions settlements were reached out between the staff

3990

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

and the Management of the company with regard to enhancement of wages and other service conditions and

on those occasions neither the IDBI nor any financial institutions were a party to such settlements.

7. The witnesses examined on behalf of the Financial Institutions have stated in an identical manner that the

financial institutions other than the company are no way liable and responsible for non-payment of salaries

and other service benefits to the staff of the company as no relationship of employer and employee exists

between them and the staff of the company. The employees of the company are covered under the Employees

Provident Funds and other provisions under ORITCO and they were receiving their wages and other benefits

from the Management of ORITCO. There is no privity of contract in any form between the Management of

the company and the Managements of the financial institutions to make the financial institutions legally duty

bound to bear the expenditure of the company towards wages of its staff. Any of the financial institutions has

any nexus with the administrative affairs of the company or its employees. The role of the institutions was

restricted to the role of an investor i.e. share-holder only. Indisputedly, it is emerging from the evidence of

these witnesses that none of the financial institutions has any role in the man-power, planning, recruitment,

selection, appointment of senior executives and other sub-ordinate staffs including fixation of salary, wages

and payment thereof. The ORITCO is neither a subsidiary of the IDBI or any other financial institution. The

staff of the company are governed by the rules and circulars introduced by the Management of ORITCO. It

has been specifically stated by these witnesses that the employees of the company are not the “workmen” of

any of the financial institutions as defined under section 2(s) of the Act. Such oral evidence of the witnesses

has not been demolished in any manner and rather, the same is getting support from the pleadings and

evidence of the 2nd party-Union. It is seen from the evidence of the witness examined on behalf of the IDBI

Management that in the meanwhile the IDBI transferred its share in favour of SIDBI. As per his evidence

those shares having been fully paid, the Management of IDBI has no liability towards loss of the company.

The documents filed by the 2nd party-Union i.e. Ext.-8 and Ext.-9 clearly reveal that on earlier occasions when

there was a dispute regarding enhancement of wages and non-payment of wages, reference and Misc. case

were instituted before the State Industrial Tribunal of Govt. of Odisha and the Management of ORITCO was

dragged only as a party to those reference and the case. Even, if it is accepted for argument sake that the

management of IDBI and other financial institutions had played or acted as a promoter of the company or

funded in formation of the company, they cannot be held responsible or liable for all the times for the liability

incurred by the company. The Management of ORITCO having a separate legal entity and juristic person can

sue and can be sued separately. The Management of all the financial institutions have no role to play either in

the day to day administration of the management of the company or in the appointment of its executives and

sub-ordinate staffs. The 2nd party-Union has failed to file any document to show that there was any privity of

contract by which either the IDBI or any other financial institution impleaded in the reference has a legal

liability towards wages and office expenses of the company. The Memorandum of Association of the company

does not bear any term and condition by virtue of which the share holders or promoters can be dragged into

the court of law to bear the liability of the company towards its office expenses or wages to be paid to its

employees. Be that as it may, the Management of the financial institutions including the IDBI cannot be held

legally or morally liable to make good of the loss sustained by the management of ORITCO so as to enable it

to pay the statutory dues and service benefits to its employees. These financial institutions cannot be

compelled or forced to make payment of statutory dues and service benefits of the workmen of the ORITCO.

The Management of ORITCO is solely liable and responsible for such non-payment of statutory dues and

service benefits. In the facts and circumstances analysed above the Management of ORITCO can be held

liable for non-payment of statutory dues and service benefits to its employees who have rendered continuous

service for several years to the organization and the Management of IDBI or any other Bank/Financial

institution is no way concerned for such non-payment of statutory dues and service benefits.

8. It is not out of place to mention here that the management of IDBI and managements of other financial

institutions have advanced a pleading that the reference is not maintainable in this forum on account of the

dispute is between the management of ORITCO and its employees and the ORITCO being a State

Government undertaking, the appropriate government in the matter is the State Government of Odisha and as

such any effort towards conciliation was supposed to be taken over by the labour machinery of the

Government of Odisha. Admittedly the company is a State Government Undertaking and it has no nexus with

the financial institutions for its day to day administration or management. On earlier occasions dispute

between the employees and the management of ORITCO was referred to the State Industrial Tribunal. Having

regard to the above fact and circumstance doubt can also be entertained on the maintainability of the reference

in this Tribunal.

The reference is answered accordingly.

Dictated & Corrected by me.

B. C. RATH, Presiding Officer

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3991

ubZ fnYyh] 18 ebZ] 2018

dk-vk- 829-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj lSUVªy cSad

vkWiQ bafM;k ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky; la- 2] ubZ fnYyh ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 16@2009) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

18-05-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&12011@129@2008&vkbZvkj (ch&II)º

jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 18th May, 2018

S.O. 829.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 16/2009) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court No. 2, New Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Central

Bank of India and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 18.05.2018.

[No. L-12011/129/2008-IR (B-II)]

RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE PRESIDING OFFICER: CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR

COURT No.2: ROOM No.512, DWARKA COURT COMPLEX, SECTOR 10, DWARKA, DELHI – 110 075

ID No. 16/2009

The President,

Central Bank Workers Union,

Link House, 4, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg,

Press Area,

New Delhi – 110 002

...Workman

Vs.

The Zonal Manager,

Central Bank of India,

Link House,

3, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg,

New Delhi – 110 002

…Management

AWARD

In this case a reference was received from the Ministry of Labour and Employment vide letter No. L-12011/

129/2008-(IR(B-II) dated 11.02.2009 under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, (in short, the Act) this for adjudication of an industrial dispute, terms of which are as

under :

‘Whether the action of the management of Central Bank of India in terminating the services of Shri Anil

Kumar with effect from 07.08.2007 is just, fair and legal? What relief the workman concerned is entitled to

and from which date?’

2.

Both parties were put to notice and upon appearance, Shri Anil Kumar (hereinafter referred to as the claimant)

filed statement of claim with the averments that he had been in the services of Central Bank of India (hereinafter

referred to as the Bank) for the last 20 years and was an Executive member of Central Bank Workers Union . He was

served with a charge sheet on 28.10.2006 alleging misappropriation by him for Rs.60,580.00 when he was working as

clerk at Sarita Vihar branch. This charge sheet was issued to the claimant in a well planned manner to punish him for

his trade union activities. Even prior to issue of the said charge sheet, claimant was issued various memos. Claimant

filed reply to the memo as well as charge sheet. However, the same was not considered by the management. It is clear

from the records that Shri R.S. Sharma, was appointed as Enquiry Officer , by the bank who has conducted a mock and

fake enquiry and enquiry report dated 28.03.2007 was submitted to him to the disciplinary authority whereby claimant

has been held guilty of the charges mentioned in the charge sheet. Thereafter, claimant filed an appeal on 20.07.2007

with Deputy General Manager. However, the same was rejected on 10.10.2017 in a mechanical manner without

appreciation of the submissions made by the claimant. Even the mercy plea filed by the claimant to the management

was also rejected as being not admissible. Claimant challenged validity of the domestic enquiry during the proceedings

3992

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

before this court by alleging that the same is in violation of principles of natural justice as well as banking norms.

Enquiry Officer was also acting under the guidance of the management as is clear from the records.

3.

It is further alleged that Shri Rajesh Goyal, DW-1 had sent Rs.60,580.00 to the claimant through his servant

and he has supported the version of the claimant by stating that the entire fault was that of his servant and not that of

the claimant. However, the Enquiry Officer has ignored the defence version of the claimant and has also not been

provided copy of Vigilance Officer’s report. Finally, the claimant has filed order of dismissal passed against him by

the competent authority.

4.

Management has filed written statement to the claim petition filed by the claimant, wherein specific

preliminary objections have been taken. It has been admitted that the claimant was in service of the bank previously

for the last 20 years and was also member of Executive Committee of Central Bank Workers Union. There is also

reference to the reply filed by the claimant. It is denied that the management had not considered evidence adduced by

the claimant. It is further alleged that the claimant is in fact guilty of misconduct and he was placed under suspension

on 02.09.2006 and thereafter he was issued charge sheet dated 28.10.2006 as per provisions of Clause 12 (b) of

Memorandum of Settlement against the claimant. Claimant has attended most of the enquiry proceedings conducted by

the management and he claimant has sought unnecessary adjournments. He was fully aware of the various dates of

proceedings of the enquiry. After considering the entire evidence on record, Enquiry Officer submitted his report

holding the charges to be proved against the claimant and management after considering the same and after due

application of mind has passed a reasoned order resulting in dismissal of the claimant.

5.

Rejoinder to the written statement was filed by the claimant wherein the stand taken in the statement of claim

was reiterated.

6.

Against this factual background, this Tribunal on the basis of pleadings of the parties, has framed the

following issues:

(i)

Whether the departmental enquiry conducted in this case is legal, just and fair and is not in violation

of the principles of natural justice? If not, what directions are called for in this case?

(ii)

As per the reference sent by the Government of India in this case.

(iii)

Relief.

7.

Issue No.(i) pertaining to the domestic enquiry was treated as preliminary issue and both parties adduced

evidence regarding privity of the enquiry before this Tribunal. This Tribunal vide order dated 08.06.2016 concluded

that the domestic enquiry has not been conducted in a fair manner and the same is against the principles of natural

justice. Accordingly, issue No.1 was decided in favour of the claimant and against the management.

8.

Thereafter, this Tribunal afforded an opportunity to the management to adduce evidence on the charge of

misconduct as mentioned in charge sheet Ex.WW1/1. Management, in order to prove misconduct initially filed

affidavit of Shri R.S. Sharma. But, later on, an application was moved on behalf of the management for substitution of

the management witness, which application was rejected by this Tribunal on the grounds of delaying tactics being

adopted by the management and evidence of the management was closed by the order of the court on 25.04.2017 and

the case was listed for workman evidence/arguments. Again, an application was moved on behalf of the management

for examining Shri Naveen Kumar, for proving misconduct of the claimant, which application was also rejected by the

Tribunal.

9.

The claimant examined himself and his affidavit is Ex.WW1/B.

10.

It is pertinent to mention here that the Hon’ble High Court in WP(C) No.5294/2017 titled ‘Central Bank of

India Vs. Anil Kumar’ has afforded an opportunity to the management to examine Shri Naveen Kumar as a witness,

subject to cost. It was against this background that Shri Naveen Kumar was examined as MW2 before this Tribunal.

11.

In the present case, it is clear from perusal of the charge sheet Ex.WW1/1 that the claimant herein was charged

on account of misconduct in respect of the following charges:

On 20.04.2016, Shri Anil Kumar received cash of Rs.60,580.00 towards payment of fees of four students of

DAV Public School, as per details given hereunder:

S.

No.

Receipt

No.

Name of Student

Class

and

Section

For the Quarter

Amount (Rs.)

1

003146

Dhruv Goyal

IX-A

April, May and June’06

5440

2

003146

Dhruv Goyal

IX-A

July, Aug. and Sept.06

3840

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3993

3

003146

Dhruv Goyal

IX-A

Oct., Nov. and Dec.06

3840

4

003146

Dhruv Goyal

IX-A

Jan., Feb. and March’07

3840

5

002820

Pratika Goyal

VIII-B

April, May and June’06

4915

6

002820

Pratika Goyal

VIII-B

July, Aug. and Sept.06

3315

7

002820

Pratika Goyal

VIII-B

Oct., Nov. and Dec.06

3315

8

002820

Pratika Goyal

VIII-B

Jan., Feb. and March’07

3315

9

001870

Manika Goyal

V-A

April, May and June’06

4885

10

001870

Manika Goyal

V-A

July, Aug. and Sept.06

3285

11

001870

Manika Goyal

V-A

Oct., Nov. and Dec.06

3285

12

001870

Manika Goyal

V-A

Jan., Feb. and March’07

3285

13

000636

Aryam Goyal

I-A

April, May and June’06

4705

14

000636

Aryam Goyal

I-A

July, Aug. and Sept.06

3105

15

000636

Aryam Goyal

I-A

Oct., Nov. and Dec.06

3105

16

000636

Aryam Goyal

I-A

Jan., Feb. and March’07

3105

TOTAL

60,580

While receiving amount of Rs.60,580.00 following lapses were committed by Shri Anil Kumar:

o

On 20.04.2006, Shri Anil Kumar was not working at Cash Receipt seat of the branch even then he

received cash as mentioned above and issued cash receipts in respect of above mentioned 16 cash

deposit receipts.

o

Cash amount of Rs.60,580.00 was received by Shri Anil Kumar without getting the above mentioned

receipts scrolled from the accounts department.

o

In token of having received the said amount, Shri Anil Kumar issued/released counterfoils, i.e.

parent’s copies of the receipts under his initials/signatures by putting rubber stamp of cash receipt of

branch office Savita Vihar dated 20.04.2006. Amount of Rs.60,580.00 deposited through these

receipts was not account for on 20.04.2006 at BO:Savit Vihar. Thus Shri Anil Kumar did not

deposit the said amount of Rs. 60,580.00 in current account No.1001323230 of DAV Public School,

Shreshta Vihar on 20.04.2006.

o

On 29.07.2006 DAV School forwarded the photocopies of aforesaid fee receipts to Savita Vihar

branch and requested for taking necessary action as the fees deposited through the above mentioned

receipts was not credited in the School’s account maintained with the branch. On 08.08.2006 entire

fees of Rs.60,580.00 plus late fees as applicable in respect of above mentioned students was

deposited in the branch through the deposit receipts of the concerned students bearing the same serial

number as the serial numbers printed on the counterfoils released by Shri Anil Kukar on 20.04.2006.

Thus, Shri Anil Kumar misappropriated funds of Rs.60,580 for 110 days.

12.

Claimant has also filed reply to the above charge sheet which is Ex.WW1/4 wherein he has denied the

allegations contained in the charge sheet. In para 6 and 7 of his reply, he has clearly stated that as far as he recollects,

on 20.04.2006, one of his friends, named Shri Rajesh Goyal, whose children are studying in DAV Public School

Shreshta Vihar sent his servant to deposit school fees. There was rush at the receipt cash counter so he took the money

and School’s challan from him and returned the parent’s copy after affixing stamp thereon on the slips of challan as

the servant told him that Shri Goyal is in a hurry. Shri Goyal was well known to him and he gave duly receipted

stamped challan copy to him and looking to his urgency, he asked the servant to wait so that he could count the cash.

While he was counting the cash, he found some notes defective and asked the servant to get them changed. The servant

came back after some time and informed him that Shri Goyal had already left and his number is not responding, hence

the claimant returned the challan copy and money to the servant and asked him to bring proper cash.

13.

It is pertinent to note here that vide order dated 11.10.2017, learned authorized representatives for the

respective parties have stated that they have no objection in case documents which have been exhibited and proved

during the course of evidence before this Tribunal while considering validity of domestic enquiry are taken into

consideration. It was thereafter that evidence of Shri Naveen Kumar was recorded.

3994

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

14.

It is well settled principle in law that when the domestic enquiry conducted by the management has been held

to be unfair or against the principles of natural justice, the evidence so recorded during the course of domestic enquiry

would not constitute to be ‘fresh evidence’ or ‘material on record’ within the meaning of Section 11-A of the Act. As

such, enquiry proceedings have been found to be bad and cannot be taken into consideration so as to prove the charge

of misconduct against the delinquent official.

15.

Now the main question before this Tribunal is as to whether the management has succeeded in proving the

misconduct against the claimant herein. In this regard, the only evidence by the management after holding domestic

enquiry to be unfair and against the principles of natural justice is that of Shri Naveen Kumar, MW2 and his affidavit is

Ex.MW2/A. He has also tendered in evidence documents Ex.MW2/1 to Ex.MW2/11. He has admitted in his statement

that letter dated 07.08.2006 as mentioned in para 4 of his affidavit Ex.MW2/A has not been placed on court file. He

further admitted that there was no written order with respect to assigning of duties of payment cashier to the claimant.

The said order was oral. He has admitted that he was a witness of the management in the domestic enquiry. He has

admitted that in his evidence before the Enquiry Officer that payments cashier also takes receipt of cash from

customers in exigencies of the bank and to provide better customer service. This witness was specifically asked about

receipts Ex.MW1/1 to MW1/4 but he was not in a position to state as to who deposited amounts mentioned in the said

receipt. He further stated that he is not aware whether Shri Rajesh Goyal appeared as a witness in the domestic

enquiry. However, he has made a vital admission that a letter dated 08.09.2006 was received from the school

authorities and this fact is clearly mentioned in the Enquiry Report at page No.70, contents of which are as under:

‘Reference to your letter dated 11.08.2006 on the above noted subject, I am to inform you that the

parents of the students as mentioned in your letter under reference have deposited the entire fees on

08.08.2006 and also given a regret letter to the school authorities regretting the inconvenience to the

school/bank.’ and the letter has been signed by Prem Lata Garg, Principal.

16.

Hence, it is apparent that the school authorities have admitted that parents of the students have deposited the

entire fees on 08.08.2006 and have also given letter of the school authorities in this behalf that any inconvenience

caused to Goyal or the School is regretted and now the school has no complaint against the bank. This letter has been

signed by Ms.Prem Lata Garg, Principal of the school. Thus, it is clear from perusal of this letter as well as other

evidence on record that the claimant herein has not misappropriated the amount in question in any manner and the

entire fees in respect of the students stood deposited on 08.08.2006. Thus, there is no question of any kind of

misappropriation or embezzlement of the above amount. Equally vital is the fact that in the charge sheet management

has used the expression ‘lapses have been committed by the claimant.’

17.

Since from the evidence on record, it is clear that there is no misappropriation of funds of any kind committed

by the claimant, as such, this Tribunal is of the view that the management has failed to prove charge of misconduct

against the claimant. Thus, the action of the management in terminating services of the claimant Shri Anil Kumar with

effect from 07.08.2007 is unjust, unfair and illegal. Hence, management is directed to reinstate Shri Anil Kumar, the

claimant herein in service with all consequential benefits. An award is, accordingly, passed. Let a copy of this Award

be sent for publication as required under Section 17 of the Act.

A.C. DOGRA, Presiding Officer

Dated: March 12, 2018

ubZ fnYyh] 18 ebZ] 2018

dk-vk- 830-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj ;wdks cSad ds

çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k@Je

U;k;ky;] t;iqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 16@2009) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18-05-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&12011@112@2008&vkbZvkj (ch&II)º

jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 18th May, 2018

S.O. 830.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 13/2009) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Jaipur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of UCO Bank and

their workmen, received by the Central Government on 18.05.2018.

[No. L-12011/112/2008-IR (B-II)]

RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3995

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, JAIPUR

PRAMOD KUMAR CHATURVEDI

PRESIDING OFFICER

I.D. 13/2009

Reference No. L-12011/112/2008-IR (B-II)

Dated: 10.2.2009

General Secretary

UCO Bank Employees Association

Zonal Office, Imperial Hotel Building,

M.I.Road, Jaipur.

V/S

Dy. General Manager

UCO Bank Zonal Office,

Arcade International, Civil Lines, Jaipur.

For the applicant Union

:

Sh. R.C.Jain, Representative.

For the opposite party

:

Sh. Ramkumar Sharma, Advocate.

AWARD

1. The Central Government in exercise of the powers conferred under clause (d) of Sub Section 1 & 2 (A) of

Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 has referred the following Industrial dispute to this tribunal for

adjudication:-

“ Whether the action of the management of UCO Bank through Dy. General Manager, Jaipur in recovering

the amount of Rs.5581/- on 5.5.1998 from the salary of the employee Shri Girish Chand Sharma, Head

Cashier from his pay of Jan., to March 1998 on account of lost of key by the employee without providing an

opportunity of being heard is just and fair? What relief the workman is entitled to and from which date?”

2. The case was called for several times. Learned representative for applicant union is present. None responds for

the opposite party.

3. After receiving the reference from the Ministry of Labour & Employment, Govt. of India notices were served

on both the parties. In response to the notice to the applicant Union, UCO Bank Employees Association,

Jaipur, submitted the statement of claim alleging that the workman Sh. Girish Chand Sharma has been

working as Head Cashier in the Bais-Godown branch of UCO bank & has also been a member of the

Associated Union. Workman Sh. Girish Chand Sharma while working as Head Cashier in the aforesaid

branch was served with notice dated 29.12.97 which he replied. It has further alleged that the Branch

Manager, MandabhimSingh without holding a proper enquiry deducted Rs.5581.30 on 8.5.98 from the salary

of the month January, February & March, 1988 of the workman for a charge of the cost of the keys which was

illegal & improper as no proper enquiry was held into the matter. The aforesaid union requested the Manager

to restore/repaid of the aforesaid amount to the workman but to no result. It has been further alleged that the

aforesaid workman was very much present on 13.7.97, 14.7.97 & 17.9.97 but the Manager of the branch

debited his leaves for the aforesaid period from his account. It has been further alleged that without any reason

the branch manager did not pay salary of the period from 3.11.97 to 6.11.97 without any reason. It has been

further alleged that the workman Sh. Girish Chand Sharma was to be granted the increments on 1.2.98,

1.2.2001 & 1.2.2004 as stagnation increment but same was not done without showing any reason. It has been

further alleged that the branch manager has also deducted Rs.1000/- from the pay of the workman without any

reason & conducting any enquiry. It has been further alleged that the branch manager directed the workman to

appear before the Superintendent of Police, Dausa on 19.4.1999 which he complied the direction of the branch

manager but his travelling allowance bill was rejected by the branch manager. Thus, it has been prayed that all

the aforesaid deductions be declared illegal & the workman be directed to be paid Rs.5581.30 in lieu of the

3996

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

deductions for the cost of the keys. It has further been prayed that workman Sh. Girish Chand Sharma be

granted first, second & third stagnation increment w.e.f. 1.2.98, 1.2.2001 & 1.2.2004 respectively along with

Rs. 1000/- being deducted from the salary of the workman by the branch manager. It has been further prayed

that he also be paid his salary of the four days leaves as deducted by the branch manager from the leave

account of the workman & four days leaves shown in the account be treated as working days of the workman.

4. The opposite party despite service, an acknowledgement of service received & also Mr. Rajkumar Kumawat,

Advocate filing his appearance on behalf of the opposite party thrice did not prefer to submit the written

statement, therefore, the case was ordered to proceed ex-parte against the opposite party on 28.7.2011.

5. The applicant union submitted affidavit of workman Sh. Girish Chand Sharma who reiterated the averments

made in the statement of claim & the opposite party despite not submitting written statement has also not

preferred to cross examine him, thus, the affidavit of the workman is fit to be believed. Thus, the reference is

finally disposed off with the observation as under:-

“The action of the management of UCO Bank through Dy. General Manager, Jaipur in recovering the

amount of Rs.5581/- on 5.5.1998 from the salary of the employees Sh. Girish Chand Sharma, Head Cashier

from his salary from January to March, 1998 on account of loss of keys by the employee without providing

an opportunity of being heard was unjust & unfair.”

6. As regards other prayers sought in the statement of claim cannot be entertained because the tribunal has no

locus standii or jurisdiction to go beyond the scope of the reference.

7. Thus, in the light of the aforesaid observations the opposite party UCO bank is directed to pay Rs.5581/- with

6% composite interest along with Rs.20,000/- as legal expenses to the employee within the sixty days from the

publication of the award. The award is passed accordingly.

8. Award as above.

PRAMOD KUMAR CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 18 ebZ] 2018

dk-vk- 831-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj dksydÙkk

iksVZ VªLV ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] dksydÙkk ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 22@2008) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18-05-2018 dks

çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&32011@3@2008&vkbZvkj (ch&II)º

jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 18th May, 2018

S.O. 831.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 22/2008) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Kolkata as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Kolkata Port

Trust and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 18.05.2018.

[No. L-32011/3/2008-IR (B-II)]

RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA

Reference No. 22 of 2008

Parties: Employers in relation to the management of Kolkata Port Trust

AND

Their workmen.

Present: Justice Ravindra Nath Mishra

…Presiding Officer

Appearance:

On behalf of the

: Mr. G. Mukherjee, Industrial Relations Officer.

Management

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3997

On behalf of the

:

M r. G.C. Chakraborty, Adviser to the Union.

Workmen

State: West Bengal.

Industry: Port & Dock.

Dated: 11th May, 2018

A W A R D

By Order No.L-32011/3/2008-IR(B-II) dated 15.09.2008 the Government of India, Ministry of Labour in

exercise of its powers under Section 10(1)(d) and (2A) of the industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following

dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

“Whether the demand of the Calcutta Port Trust Worker’s Union, claiming for promotion of Sri Manoj

Upadhayay, LDC on selection basis, to the post of Law Assistant in Estate Department of Kolkata Port Trust,

is justified and legal? If so, to what relief the workman is entitled for?”

2.

In response to notice issued by this Tribunal, parties appeared and filed their pleadings. In the statement of

claim, the workman’s union has stated that Shri Manoj Upadhayay was initially appointed as T.T. Driver under C.T.M.

of Kolkata Port Trust on 3rd September, 1991. Subsequently he was appointed as Lower Division Clerk with effect

from 3rd July, 2000 and was posted at Mechanical Engineering Department. He was entrusted with the matters relating

to court cases. He was also asked to appear before the Estate Officer in various court cases as and when the concerned

Assistant Law Manager (Legal) was not available. Thus he was discharging all the duties and responsibilities which

were vested with the Law Assistant. The management of Kolkata Port Trust issued a circular for filling of the post of

Law Assistant in the Estate Department fixing essential criteria interalia that a candidate having 10 years working

experience either as Head Clerk or as Head Clerk and U.D.C. taken together with a degree in law from recognized

university and thorough knowledge of the procedure of civil and criminal courts. The circular was issued by the

management with a vindictive attitude to deprive the workman from his legitimate claim for the post of Law Assistant

as previously one Shri Somnath Dey who was working as a Lower Division Clerk have been promoted as Law

Assistant in the year 1988 on the basis of circular dated 8th June, 1987 in which there was no criteria of 10 years

experience. The decision of the management for filling up the post of Law Assistant from outsiders particularly from

the ex-army men is the vindictive action of the management against the workman. Despite several demands the

management did not disclose rules and procedure for promotion of Shri Somnath Dey in the year 1988. Thus, refusal

for promotion of the workman to the post of Law assistant in the Estate Department with effect from 5th February, 2004

is not at all justified.

3.

The management has contested the claim of the union by filing written statement in which it has been interalia

pleaded that the post of Law Assistant in the scale of Rs.6170 – 11975 under the Estate Department is in Class-III cadre

and is the highest scale of pay available in the said cadre. The post of Law Assistant being a selection grade post,

promotion is to be made strictly as per the merit of the eligible candidates and not on the basis of seniority or seniority-

cum-suitability. It has further been pleaded that in the year 2002 a post of Law Assistant in the Estate Department fell

vacant and it was decided to fill up the vacancy of departmental candidates from amongst the Head Clerk having 10

years of service and LL.B. degree. Accordingly a circular was issued on 10th February, 2003 inviting applications from

the eligible candidates of all the departments of Kolkata Dock System. However, no application was received against

the said circular. Therefore, it was decided to relax experience criteria from 10 years as Head Clerk to 10 years of

service in different cadres from LDC to Head Clerk taken together. This time also, candidates fulfilling the

requirements were not available compelling the management to further relax experience criteria. The experience

criteria was relaxed to 10 years experience as U.D. Clerk (Selection grade) and Head Clerk taken together with LL.B.

degree. This time also no application was received in response to the circular. Therefore, it was decided to approach the

Government seeking permission for filling up the post by direct recruitment. On 21st Februry, 2005 when second

circular was issued by Estate Department inviting applications from the Head Clerk having LL.B. degree and 10 years

experience in clerical grade, the workman Shri Manoj Upadhayay made an application for the said post but as his

qualification and experience did not match to the stipulated requirement, his case was not considered. The management

has further pleaded that promotion of Shri Somnath Dey for the post of Law Assistant in the year 1988 is distinctly

different on facts and circumstances of the case which cannot form basis of promotion of Shri Manoj Upadhayay. The

management has denied that vindictive attitude has been taken towards Shri Majoj Upadhayay to deprive him of his

claim for the post of Law Assistant and a new procedure for promotion to the post of Law Assistant was adopted. It is

also denied that shri Manoj Upadhayay ever discharged duties and responsibilities of a Law Assistant. Finally it is

pleaded that demand for promotion of the workman, Shri Manoj Upadhayay to the post of Law Assistant is unjustified

and without any merit and consequently he is not entitled to any relief.

3998

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

4.

The union has filed a rejoinder against the written statement of the management reiterating the facts stated in

the statement of claim.

5.

In support of the claim of the workman the union has examined the concerned workman as WW-01 who has

also been cross-examined by the management. For the management Smt. Subarna Thakur as MW-01 has filed her

affidavit in examination in chief and has appeared for cross-examination by the union.

6.

The contention of the union is that the circulars issued by the management on 10th November, 2003,

20th October, 2005 and on 11th August, 2006 prescribing 10 years experience is nothing but vindictive attitude towards

the workman as previously the circular dated 8th June, 1987 issued for promotion to the post of Law Assistant and on

the basis of which Shri Somnath Dey was promoted does not prescribe any experience. The union has further

contended that the workman has been discharging duties and responsibilities of Law Assistant and therefore, he is

entitled for promotion to the post.

7.

Now the question arises whether an employee has a right for promotion? Elaborating this point, Hon’ble

Supreme Court has held in Badrinath v. Government of Tamilnadu & Ors, AIR 2000 SC 3243 that every officer has

right to be considered for promotion under Article 16 of the Constitution to higher post subject to eligibility provided

he is within the zone of consideration and the courts will not interfere with the assessment made by the departmental

promotion committee, unless the aggrieved officer establishes that the non-promotion was malafide. Now, in the

present case, as per subsequent circulars issued by the management of Kolkata Port Trust, the workman Shri Manoj

Uoadhayay was not at all within the zone of consideration. Simply because in circular issued in 1987 the requirement

of experience was not there, it cannot be said that subsequent circular was malafide or in any way vindictive towards to

the workman.

8.

It is not the case of the union that the management had no authority to issue circulars dated 10.11.2003 and

11.08.2006 prescribing work experience. There is nothing in Kolkata Port Trust Employees (Recruitment, Seniority and

Promotion) Regulations, 1985 which prescribed eligibility for promotion to the post of Law Assistant. It is for the

management to decide criteria for eligibility by issuing circulars. The workman is not discriminated from amongst the

equals, i.e., it is not the case of the union that in pursuance of subsequent circular somebody was appointed as Law

Assistant who had no work experience.

9.

The union has relied on letter dated 19th January, 2010 of Kolkata Port Trust to contend that shri Somnath

Dey was promoted to the post of Law Assistant on the basis of circular dated 8th June, 1987. The above letter dated

19th January, 2010 is a report submitted by the Land Manager of Estate Department on representation of the workman

which mentions promotion of shri Somnath Dey in the year 1988 but at the same time it also mentions that

recruitment/promotion was done in contravention of the recruitment rules and the recruitment rules were not followed.

It also mentions that the mistakes done by the management cannot be perpetuated. Thus, even though the workman was

discriminated, his promotion to the post of Law Assistant has no legal foundation as two wrongs could not make one

right. Hon’ble Supreme Court in Kastha Niwarak Grahnirman Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit v. Indore

Development Authority, AIR 2006 SC 1142 has held that two wrongs do not make one right. The relevant portion of

the judgment may be extracted as below for better appreciation:

“Two wrongs do not make one right. A party cannot claim that since something wrong has been done in

another case, direction should be given for doing another wrong. It would not be setting a wrong right, but

would be perpetuating another wrong. In such matters, there is no discrimination involved. The concept of

equal treatment on the logic of Article 14 of the Constitution cannot be pressed into service in such cases.

What the concept of equal treatment presupposes is existence of similar legal foothold. It does not

countenance repetition of wrong action to bring both wrongs at par. Even if hypothetically it is accepted that

wrong has been committed in some other case by introducing a concept of negative equality, the appellant

cannot strengthen its case. It has to establish its case on some other basis and not by claiming negative

equality.”

Thus on the basis of precedence of Shri Somnath Dey the union cannot claim promotion of the workman to the post of

Law Assistant.

10.

The union can also not claim promotion of workman, Shri Manoj Upadhayay to the post of Law Assistant on

the basis of entrustment of duties and responsibilities of law Assistant. A person can be promoted only when he fulfills

the requisite qualification for a particular post. Similarly, because a person has been entrusted the work relating to court

and legal matters, he does not become entitled to hold the post of Law Assistant.

11.

In view of the above, I come to the conclusion that the demand of the Kolkata Port Trust Worker’s Union

claiming promotion of Shri Manoj Upadhayay , LDC on selection basis to the post of Law Assistant in the Estate

Department is not at all justified and legal and therefore he is not entitled to any relief.

Award is passed accordingly.

Justice RAVINDRA NATH MISHRA, Presiding Officer

Dated, Kolkata,

11th May, 2018.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

3999

ubZ fnYyh] 21 ebZ] 2018

dk-vk- 832-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj] mi

funs'kd] ;wukuh fpfdRlk] {ks=kh; vuqla/ku laLFkku] y[kuÅ vkSj vU; ,oa muds deZpkjh ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds

deZdkjksa ds chp vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] y[kuÅ ds iapkV

(lanHkZ la[;k 18@2005) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 09-05-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&42025@03@2018&vkbZvkj (Mh-;w-)º

jktsUnz tks'kh] mi funs'kd

New Delhi, the 21st May, 2018

S.O. 832.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Misc. No. 18/2005) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Lucknow as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the

Dy. Director, Regional Research Institute of Unani Medicine, Lucknow & other and their workmen, which was

received by the Central Government on 09.05.2018.

[No. L-42025/03/2008-IR (DU)]

RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW

PRESENT: Rakesh Kumar, Presiding Officer

Misc No. 18/2005

Sri Balram Singh Lodhi S/o Sri Ram Pal

R/o Village Raniapur, Post Awarawan Distt. Lucknow

Vs

1. Dy. Director,

Regional Research Institute of Unani Medicine

163-164, Terhi Pulia, Kursi Road

Sector, C, Jankipuram, Lucknow

2. The Director

Central Council for Research in Unani Medicine

61-65, Industrial Area, Opposite D Block

Janakpuri, New Delhi

ORDER

The petitioner Sri Balram Singh Lodhi has moved application under section 33 of the I.D. Act,

mentioning therein that he alongwith some other workmen had raised the industrial dispute pertaining to their

regularization before ALC (C), after failure of the conciliation matter was referred by the Govt. for adjudication

which was sent to the Tribunal. It has been alleged in the petition that during the pendency of the proceeding

before the ALC( C) the employer has stopped to take work from the applicant w.e.f. 25.7.2000 on the pretext of the

shortage of fund, after interference by the ALC (C) the applicant alongwith other workmen were taken back in

service, and since then they have been working with some notional break. Proceedings pending under the

Minimum Wages Act. as case no. 231-234/2000 have also been mentioned in the petition.

2. The workman has alleged that during the pendency of the connected I.D. case, the management has

stopped to take work from him w.e.f. 23.01.2004, it amounts to retrenchment the said retrenchment is

illegal and void-ab-initio, protection of Section 25F of the I.D. Act, ought to have been given since the

petitioner has worked for more than 6 years continuously without any break. Contravention of Section 33

of the I.D. Act. has also been stressed in the petition. With the aforesaid averments, request has been made

to declare the termination of the service of the applicant w.e.f. 23.01.2004 as illegal and unjustified.

Further prayer has been made for his reinstatement with full back wages etc. The petition is supported by

an affidavit of the workman.

4000

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

3. The management has filed objection M-11, with strong denial of the allegations made by the workman. It

has been asserted by the opposite party that the ALC ( C ) has no jurisdiction and petitioner is speaking

lie, and contrary version has been taken by the workmen, firstly he was claiming stoppage of work from

25.07.2004, some where it is 23.01.2004. The opposite party has further asserted that the application is

misconceived and is liable to be dismissed.

4. Later on reply/rejoinder W-17 has been filed by the workmen with strong denial of the counter allegations

leveled in the objection filed by the management, reiterating the pleas taken in the petition filed by him.

5. The workman has filed affidavit alongwith annexures. He has been cross examined on behalf of the

management.

6. The management has filed affidavit of Smt. Rafat Mehmooda M-35, Dr. Idris Ahmed, M-39, Waseem

Ahmed, M-51 and Dr. Mohd. Arshad, M-52.

7. With the consent of both the parties certified photo copies of cross examination of Dr. M.Arshad and Idris

Ahmad have been filed in this case.

8. Perusal of the record reveals that the conduct of the management has been very careless and lethargic, and

on several occasions matter was taken ex-parte but on the request of the opposite party, the ex-parte order

was recalled. However, the cost imposed by the Court was not paid to the workman and the official of the

management or the Learned AR of the management refrained themselves to appear and to participate in

the proceeding of the case. Again several dates were fixed, so as to give more opportunity to the opposite

party to participate in the process of dispensation of justice but the management and its officers have been

very negligent, and the officials and the Learned AR abstained themselves for the reasons best known to

them. Undoubtedly, proceedings can not be lingered on endlessly or perpetually without any cogent and

genuine reason. Under these circumstances the arguments of the Learned AR of the workman were heard

at length and record has been scanned thoroughly.

9. The main allegations of the workman is that during the pendency of the connected I.D. 110/02 which has

arisen with reference to the Schedule dated 25.06.2002 referred by the Govt. of India to this Tribunal for

adjudication, the opposite party has with malafide intention stopped to take work from the petitioner

workman w.e.f. 23.01.2004, the so called contradiction in the petition regarding the date of stoppage of

work has been duly explained by the workman. The petitioner has elaborated that on intervention made by

the ALC ( C ) the workman alongwith other colleagues was taken back in service and later on he was

retrenched from 23.01.2004, as a consequence of stoppage of work.

10. The management witness Dr. M. Idris in his cross examination (recorded in I.D. 110/02 has admitted that

he had not perused any record pertaining to the workman/labourer). However, he has given name of

5 persons working in the Herb Garden w.e.f. 2007 to 2015. Other management witness Sri Idris Ahmad in

his cross examination (recorded in I.D. 110/02) has admitted in para 7 that the concerned petitioners have

worked in the department as daily wagers and relevant muster roll should have been there in the

concerned department.

11. The management has failed to corroborate its version that the petitioner had not worked beyond

12.07.2000. Learned AR for the workman has emphatically asserted that the petitioner has continued to

work till 22.01.2004.

12. Another material fact has been brought to the notice of the Court. The case no. MW 231 to 234 of 2000,

under the Minimum Wages Act. was adjudicated in favour of the workman vide order dated 06.07.2005

wherein the management has directed to ensure the payment of the compensation etc. to the applicants

and other workmen in the respective cases. Any evidence by the opposite party to contradict this judgment

has not been filed. The management did not produce the muster roll and the attendance register before the

Competent Authority.

13. After having heard the learned AR for the workman and perusal of the record available before the Court,

it is inferred that the alleged termination of service of the applicant w.e.f. 23.01.2004 during the pendency

of the connected I.D. 110/02, can not be adjudged as legal or justified. Provisions of Section 33 A of the

I.D. Act. are mandatory in nature and it has to be followed in letter and spirit. The aforesaid

termination is set aside, and petitioner is entited for his reinstatement alongwith full back wages.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

4001

The arrear due, shall be paid by the management within 10 weeks,from the date of notification of

the Award, failing which the petitioner will also be entitled to get interest @ 6% per annum.

Petition dated 06.04.2005 is disposed accordingly.

14. Award as above

RAKESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer

Lucknow

01.05.2018

ubZ fnYyh] 21 ebZ] 2018

dk-vk- 833-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj] mi

funs'kd] ;wukuh fpfdRlk] {ks=kh; vuqla/ku laLFkku] y[kuÅ vkSj vU; ,oa muds deZpkjh ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds

deZdkjksa ds chp vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] y[kuÅ ds iapkV

(lanHkZ la[;k 06@2005) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 09-05-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&42025@03@2018&vkbZvkj (Mh-;w-)º

jktsUnz tks'kh] mi funs'kd

New Delhi, the 21st May, 2018

S.O. 833.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Misc. No. 06/2005) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Lucknow as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the

Dy. Director, Regional Research Institute of Unani Medicine, Lucknow & other and their workmen, which was

received by the Central Government on 09.05.2018.

[No. L-42025/03/2018-IR (DU)]

RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW

PRESENT: Rakesh Kumar, Presiding Officer

Misc No. 6/2005

Sri Om Prakash Verma

S/o Sri Chhotey Lal

R/o Village Quila Mohammadi Nagar

Post: Bhadurkh, Distt. Lucknow

Vs

1. Dy. Director,

Regional Research Institute of Unani Medicine

163-164, Terhi Pulia, Kursi Road

Sector, C, Jankipuram, Lucknow

2. The Director

Central Council for Research in Unani Medicine

61-65, Industrial Area, Opposite D Block

Janakpuri, New Delhi

ORDER

The petitioner Sri O.P. Verma has moved application under section 33 of the I.D. Act, mentioning therein

that he alongwith some other workmen had raised the industrial dispute pertaining to their regularization before

ALC ( C ), after failure of the conciliation matter was referred by the Govt. for adjudication which was sent to the

Tribunal. It has been alleged in the petition that during the pendency of the proceeding before the ALC( C) the

employer has stopped to take work from the applicant w.e.f. 25.7.2000 on the pretext of the shortage of fund, after

interference by the ALC ( C ) the applicant alongwith other workmen were taken back in service, and since then

they have been working with some notional break. Proceedings pending under the Minimum Wages Act. as case

no. 231-234/2000 have also been mentioned in the petition.

4002

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2. The workman has alleged that during the pendency of the connected I.D. case, the management has

stopped to take work from him w.e.f. 23.01.2004, it amounts to retrenchment the said retrenchment is

illegal and void-ab-initio, protection of Section 25F of the I.D. Act, ought to have been given since the

petitioner has worked for more than 6 years continuously without any break. Contravention of Section 33

of the I.D. Act. has also been stressed in the petition. With the aforesaid averments, request has been made

to declare the termination of the service of the applicant w.e.f. 23.01.2004 as illegal and unjustified.

Further prayer has been made for his reinstatement with full back wages etc. The petition is supported by

an affidavit of the workman.

3. The management has filed ;objection M-8, with strong denial of the allegations made by the workman. It

has been asserted by the opposite party that the ALC ( C ) has no jurisdiction and petitioner is speaking

lie, and contrary version has been taken by the workmen, firstly he was claiming stoppage of work from

25.07.2004, some where it is 23.01.2004. The opposite party has further asserted that the application is

misconceived and is liable to be dismissed.

4. Later on reply/rejoinder W-12 has been filed by the workmen with strong denial of the counter allegations

leveled in the objection filed by the management, reiterating the pleas taken in the petition filed by him.

5. The workman has filed affidavit alongwith annexures. He has been cross examined on behalf of the

management.

6. The management has filed affidavit of Smt. Rafat Mehmooda M-25, Dr. Idris Ahmed, M-29, Waseem

Ahmed, M-40 and Dr. Mohd. Arshad, M-41.

7. With the consent of both the parties certified photo copies of cross examination of Dr. M.Arshad and Idris

Ahmad have been filed in this case.

8. Perusal of the record reveals that the conduct of the management has been very careless and lethargic, and

on several occasions matter was taken ex-parte but on the request of the opposite party, the ex-parte order

was recalled. However, the cost imposed by the Court was not paid to the workman and the official of the

management or the Learned AR of the management refrained themselves to appear and to participate in

the proceeding of the case. Again several dates were fixed, so as to give more opportunity to the opposite

party to participate in the process of dispensation of justice but the management and its officers have been

very negligent, and the officials and the Learned AR abstained themselves for the reasons best known to

them. Undoubtedly, proceedings can not be lingered on endlessly or perpetually without any cogent and

genuine reason. Under these circumstances the arguments of the Learned AR of the workman were heard

at length and record has been scanned thoroughly.

9. The main allegations of the workman is that during the pendency of the connected I.D. 110/02 which has

arisen with reference to the Schedule dated 25.06.2002 referred by the Govt. of India to this Tribunal for

adjudication, the opposite party has with malafide intention stopped to take work from the petitioner

workman w.e.f. 23.01.2004, the so called contradiction in the petition regarding the date of stoppage of

work has been duly explained by the workman. The petitioner has elaborated that on intervention made by

the ALC ( C ) the workman alongwith other colleagues was taken back in service and later on he was

retrenched from 23.01.2004, as a consequence of stoppage of work.

10. The management witness Dr. M.Idris in his cross examination (recorded in I.D. 110/02 has admitted that

he had not perused any record pertaining to the workman/labourer). However, he has given name of 5

persons working in the Herb Garden w.e.f. 2007 to 2015. Other management witness Sri Idris Ahmad in

his cross examination (recorded in I.D. 110/02) has admitted in para 7 that the concerned petitioners have

worked in the department as daily wagers and relevant muster roll should have been there in the

concerned department.

11. The management has failed to corroborate its version that the petitioner had not worked beyond

12.07.2000. Learned AR for the workman has emphatically asserted that the petitioner has continued to

work till 22.01.2004.

12. Another material fact has been brought to the notice of the Court. The case no. MW 231 to 234 of 2000,

under the Minimum Wages Act. was adjudicated in favour of the workman vide order dated 06.07.2005

wherein the management has directed to ensure the payment of the compensation etc. to the applicants

and other workmen in the respective cases. Any evidence by the opposite party to contradict this judgment

has not been filed. The management did not produce the muster roll and the attendance register before the

Competent Authority.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

4003

13. After having heard the learned AR for the workman and perusal of the record available before the Court,

it is inferred that the alleged termination of service of the applicant w.e.f. 23.01.2004 during the pendency

of the connected I.D. 110/02, can not be adjudged as legal or justified. Provisions of Section 33 A of the

I.D. Act. are mandatory in nature and it has to be followed in letter and spirit. The aforesaid

termination is set aside, and petitioner is entited for his reinstatement alongwith full back wages.

The arrear due, shall be paid by the management within 10 weeks, from the date of notification of

the Award, failing which the petitioner will also be entitled to get interest @ 6% per annum.

Petition dated 06.04.2005 is disposed accordingly.

14. Award as above.

RAKESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer

Lucknow,

01.05.2018

ubZ fnYyh] 21 ebZ] 2018

dk-vk- 834-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj] ÝySV

vf/dkjh] deka¯Mx bu phiQ] osLVuZ usoy] eqacbZ ,oa muds deZpkjh vkSj vU; ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds

chp vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,pa Je U;k;ky;] u- II] eqacbZ iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k

CGIT-2/16 of 2013) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18-04-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&14011@11@2012&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)º

jktsUnz tks'kh] mi funs'kd

New Delhi, the 21st May, 2018

S.O. 834.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (CGIT-2/16 of 2013) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court No. II, Mumbai as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to

the Flat Officer, Commanding in Chief, Western Naval, Mumbai and their workmen & Others, which was received by

the Central Government on 18.04.2018.

[No. L-14011/11/2012-IR (DU)]

RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.2, MUMBAI

PRESENT: M. V. Deshpande, Presiding Officer

REFERENCE NO. CGIT-2/16 of 2013

EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF

COMMANDING IN CHIEF, WESTERN NAVAL COMMAND

The Flat Officer,

Commanding in Chief, Western Naval

Command, Shahid Bhagat Singh Road,

Fort, Mumbai – 400 023.

AND

THEIR WORKMEN.

The General Secretary,

Indian Naval Emp. Union,

12/14, Rajgir Chambers, R. No. 60,

7th Fl., Shahid Bhagat Singh Road,

Opp. Old Custom House, Mumbai – 400 023.

APPEARANCES:

FOR THE EMPLOYER

:

Mr. N. J. Gonsalves, Advocate

FOR THE WORKMEN

:

Mr. J. H. Sawant, Advocate

Mumbai, dated the 12th March, 2018

4004

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

AWARD

1.

This is reference made by the Central Government in exercise of powers under clause (d) of sub-section (1)

and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 vide Government of India, Ministry of Labour

& Employment, New Delhi vide its order No. L-14011/11/2012 – IR (DU) dated 07.03.2013. The terms of reference

given in the schedule are as follows :

“Whether the action of the management of the Flat Officer, Commanding in Chief Western Naval Command,

Mumbai in denying the promotion to Shri H. G. Gund, Skilled Tradesman to Highly Skilled Tradesman in the

year 2004-05 is legal, just and proper ? If not, what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?”

2.

After the receipt of the reference, both the parties were served with the notices. They appeared through their

respective representatives.

3.

Second party filed statement of claim Ex.7. According to the second party, the concerned workman was

Skilled Tradesman working in the establishment of first party in its Naval Transport Pool. On the basis of seniority as

well as suitability he was eligible for consideration and grant of promotion to the grade of Highly Skilled Tradesman

against the vacancy that arose on and from 21.7.04. However, the first party instead of granting him said promotion to

the grade of Highly Skilled Tradesman against the said vacancy, granted promotion to Shri N.C. Panchal, Skilled

Tradesman to the grade of Highly Skilled Tradesman despite of the fact that Shri Panchal was junior in service to the

concerned workman and the concerned workman was found fit for the said promotion in the year 1993 itself.

4.

It is also the contention of the second party that the concerned workman was informed that his claim for

promotion in the grade of Highly Skilled Tradesman on or from 21.7.04 was not considered by the Departmental

Promotion Committee [DPC] in view of low assessment in accordance with para 6 of DPC instructions read with

DoPT’s office Memorandum dt. 28.3.06.

5.

According to the concerned workman it was obligatory on the part of first party to inform the second party

periodically of low marks or any adverse remarks in the ACR in order to give second party an opportunity to make

necessary improvement in his work so that he should not be condemned unheard and deprived of the promotion. The

first party never informed to the second party of any deficiencies in the work and therefore the adverse remarks noted

in his ACR cannot be used against him to deprive him from the promotion in the grade of Highly Skilled Tradesman.

Second party workman is therefore entitled to be promoted and placed in the grade of Highly Skilled Tradesman w.e.f.

21.7.04 with all consequential benefits with retrospective effect. Second party workman is therefore asking to declare

that the action of the first party in denying promotion to him in the grade of Highly Skilled Tradesman w.e.f. 21.7.04 is

illegal, unjust and improper.

6.

First party management resisted claim by filing written statement Ex.8 contending therein that the concerned

workman was not promoted to the grade of Highly Skilled Tradesman due to his low merit during the period from

1.4.96 to 31.3.02 due to assessment of individual below the bench mark in ACRs or DPCs for the year 1996-97 to

2002-03, concerned workman Shri H.G. Gund was not considered for promotion to the grade of Highly Skilled

Tradesman.

7.

It is then contended that para 6 of DPC instructions read with DoPT order dt. 10.4.89 a person whose

assessment is below bench mark of “good” cannot be included in the select list. Shri Panchal was promoted instead of

concerned workman whose merit rating was considered undistinguished on that occasion.

8.

It is then contended that overall grading given in ACR were not communicated because as per existing

instructions at the time of promotion of shri Panchal the overall grading recorded in ACR has not to be changed in any

way even after the expunction of adverse remark either fully or partially by the competent authority. Hence action of

management is in conformity and in accordance with the then in vogue DoPT instructions contained in office

memorandum dt. 10.4.89. The first party management thus prayed for rejection of reference.

9.

Following issues are framed at Ex.9. I reproduce the issues along with my findings thereon for the reasons to

follow:

Sr. No.

Issues

Findings

1

Whether the action of the management in denying the promotion to the

Workman Shri H.G. Gund, Skilled Tradesman to Highly Skilled

Tradesman w.e.f. 21.7.04 is legal, just and proper ?

No

2.

What relief the workmen are entitled to ?

As per final order

3.

What order ?

As per final order

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

4005

Reasons

Issue No.1.

10.

It seems to be admitted position that the second party workman was not promoted to the grade of Highly

Skilled Tradesman on the basis of assessment of individual ACRs for DPC years 1996-97, 97-98, 98-99, 2001-02. It

also seems to be admitted position that as per DPC instructions read with DoPT office memorandum No. F22011/5/86-

Estt. (D) dated 10.4.89, a person whose assessment is below mark of “good” cannot be included in the select list. It

also seems to be an admitted position that on complaint by the concerned workman he was informed that his claim for

promotion in the grade of Highly Skilled Tradesman on and from 27.4.04 was not considered by the DPC in view of

low assessment in accordance with para 6 of DPC instructions read with DoPT office memorandum dt. 28.3.06.

Therefore the question is whether there was any written communication to the concerned workman regarding grading

of the concerned workman as average or otherwise as regards to his performance.

11.

I say so because such communication is necessary in order to have an opportunity to the concerned workman

to improve his performance. Even as per office memorandum dt. 28.3.06 it was obligatory on the part of first party to

inform the second party periodically of low marks or any adverse remarks in his ACR in order to give the second party

workman an opportunity to make necessary improvement in his work so that he should not be condemned unheard and

deprived of the promotion to any higher grade.

12.

For it is explicit from the glaring admission given by Vijendra Singh, the witness of the first party that there

was no written communication to the second party workman regarding the grading of the second party as average or

otherwise in respect of his performance. He admits that there was no communication to the second party regarding

grading given to him in his ACR. If that is so then it can be said that no opportunity was given to the second party

before denying promotion to him and denying such promotion without giving any opportunity is like a punishment for

misconduct which cannot be imposed without following procedure and also following principles of natural justice.

13.

Learned Counsel for the concerned workman submitted that if the rating of the concerned was below average

then it was incumbent upon the management to communicate that assessment of his work to the concerned workman.

Since that was not done then it can be said that no opportunity was given to the concerned workman to submit the

representation against the said remark / entries in respect of the marks given. In the context he seeks to rely on the

decision in case of Dev Dutt V/S. Union of India & Ors. AIR 2008 (SC 2513) wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court has

concluded that every entry in ACR of the public servant must be communicated to him within the reasonable period

whether it is poor, fair, average, good or very good. The Hon’ble Apex Court has observed in para 17 & 18 of the

judgment that,

“In our opinion, every entry in the A.C.R. of a public servant must be communicated to him within a

reasonable period, whether it is a poor, fair, average, good or very good entry. This is because non-

communication of such an entry may adversely affect the employee in two ways : (1) Had the entry been

communicated to him he would know about the assessment of his work and conduct by his superiors, which

would enable him to improve his work in future (2) He would have an opportunity of making a representation

against the entry if he feels it is unjustified, and pray for its upgradation. Hence non-communication of an

entry is arbitrary, and it has been held by the Constitution Bench decision of this Court in Maneka Gandhi vs.

Union of India (supra) that arbitrariness violates Article 14 of the Constitution.

Thus it is not only when there is a benchmark but in all cases that an entry (whether it is poor, fair, average,

good or very food) must be communicated to a public servant, otherwise there is violation of the principle of

fairness, which is the soul of natural justice. Even an outstanding entry should be communicated since that

would boost the morale of the employee and make him work harder.”

14.

Learned Counsel for the concerned workman has also relied on the decision in case of Sukhdev Singh V/S.

Union of India in Civil Appeal No. 5892/2006 wherein the Hon’ble Apex Court while referring to the decision in case

of Dev Dutt V/S. Union of India & Ors. has concluded that every entry in ACR of public servant must be

communicated to him / her within the reasonable period. The Hon’ble Apex Court thus observed that even in cases

there is no bench mark laid down by the authorities for promotion, non-communication of entries in the ACR of the

public servant is arbitrary because it deprive the concerned employee on making representation against it and praying

for its upgradation. Every entry in the ACR of every employee under the State whether he is civil, judicial, police or

other service (except Military) must be communicated to him so as to enable him to make the representation against it

because non communication deprive the employee of the opportunity of making representation against it which may

affect his chance of being promoted. Hence the non-communication is arbitrary and violative of article 14 of the

Constitution.

15.

In view of this legal position it was necessary for the first party management to communicate the assessment

of the concerned workman to him before denying promotion when as a matter of fact he was not considered for

4006

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

promotion on the ground that assessment of the concerned workman was below bench mark in ACRs for DPC years

1996-97 to 2002-03. It will have to be said therefore that he was not given an opportunity to make representation in

respect of assessment of his work. In view of that action of denying promotion to him is illegal.

16.

In view of that it will be open to the concerned workman to make representation to the first party management

for retrospective promotion in view of legal position cited supra. If such representation is made by the concerned

workman, the same shall be considered by the first party appropriately in accordance with law. If the upgradation is

allowed from 21.7.04, the first party should consider forthwith for his promotion as Highly Skilled Tradesman from

21.7.04 retrospectively. If he is promoted from 21.7.04 then he will be entitled to get the benefit of balance of arrears

of pay along with 8% per annum interest and other consequential benefits. Issue No.1 is therefore answered

accordingly as indicated against it.

Issue No.2 & 3.

17.

In view of my findings to Issue No.1, I find that the concerned workman is entitled to relief to some extent as

per final order. Thus the order.

ORDER

1.

It is declared that the action of first party in denying promotion to the concerned workman Shri H.G.

Gund from Skilled Tradesman to Highly Skilled Tradesman w.e.f. 21.7.04 is unjustified and improper.

2.

It is open to the concerned workman to make representation to the concerned authorities for

retrospective promotion and if such representation is made by him, the same shall be considered by the concerned

authorities appropriately in accordance with law.

3.

If the representation is allowed the concerned workman should be considered forthwith for promotion

retrospectively w.e.f. 21.7.04 and if he is promoted, he will get the balance of arrears of pay along with 8% per

annum interest and other consequential benefits from 21.7.04.

M.V. DESHPANDE, Presiding Officer

Dated

12.3.2018

ubZ fnYyh] 21 ebZ] 2018

dk-vk- 835-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj]

v?;{k&lg&izca/ funs'kd] bZ-lh-th-lh- fyfeVsM] eqacbZ ,oa muds deZpkjh vkSj vU; ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds

deZdkjksa ds chp vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] u- II] eqacbZ iapkV

(lanHkZ la[;k CGIT-2/10 of 2012) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18-04-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&42011@197@2011&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)º

jktsUnz tks'kh] mi funs'kd

New Delhi, the 21st May, 2018

S.O. 835.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (CGIT-2/10 of 2012) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court No. II, Mumbai as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to

the Chairman-cum-Managing Director, E.C.G.C. Ltd., Mumbai and their workmen & others, which was received by

the Central Government on 18.04.2018.

[No. L-42011/197/2011-IR (DU)]

RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.2, MUMBAI

PRESENT: M. V. Deshpande, Presiding Officer

REFERENCE NO.CGIT-2/10 of 2012

EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF

E. C. G. C. LTD.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

4007

The Chairman-cum-Managing Director,

E. C. G. C. Ltd.,

Express Towers, 10th Fl.,

Jamuna Lal Bajaj Marg, Nariman Point,

Mumbai – 400 021.

AND

THEIR WORKMEN.

The General Secretary,

Mumbai Port Trust General Workers Union,

1st Floor, Kavarana Building,

26/4, P. D. Mello Road, Wadi Bunder, Mumbai.

APPEARANCES:

FOR THE EMPLOYER

:

Mr. Anees Patel, Adv. i/b. Ambalal & Co.

FOR THE WORKMEN

:

Mr. V. Narayanan, Advocate

Mumbai, dated the 9th March, 2018.

AWARD

1.

This is reference made by the Central Government in exercise of powers under clause (d) of sub-section (1)

and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 vide Government of India, Ministry of Labour

& Employment, New Delhi vide its order No. L-42011/197/2011 – IR (DU) dated 27.02.2012. The terms of reference

given in the schedule are as follows :

“Whether the demand of Mumbai Port Trust Workers Union for regularization of the services of Shri Santosh

B. Surve & 13 other drivers (as per list enclosed) in the establishment of Export Credit Guarantee

Corporation of India Ltd., Mumbai is legal and justified ? What relief the workman is entitled to ?“

2.

After the receipt of the reference, both the parties were served with the notices. They appeared through their

respective representatives.

3.

Second party union filed statement of claim Ex.5. According to the second party union, the concerned

workmen are employed as drivers for Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd. The activities of the first party

company including among other things export oriented company charge free for various services rendered. The

company’s Board of Directors includes among others Joint Secretary, Ministry of Commerce as Chairman-cum-

Managing Director, Joint Director, Ministry of Finance, Executive Director of R.B.I. and many others. The company is

also controlled & supervised by the Govt. of India, Ministry of Commerce.

4.

It is then case of the concerned workmen that they have been working for the company as their direct

employees on casual basis without any break in service and with the hope that the company would consider their

request for regularization. The workmen themselves and through various other unions made repeated attempts to get

their services regularized. The workmen cause was agitated by MbPT General workers union. However, due to non-

cooperative attitude of the management no settlement was possible and the matter ended in failure. RLC’s office was

pleased to send the failure report. The Ministry of Labour thereafter passed an order referring the above matter for

adjudication to this tribunal.

5.

It is thus contention of the concerned workmen that they were working as drivers for senior Executives of the

Corporation on full time basis. The vehicles drivers used to drive are owned by the Corporation. The Petrol,

maintenance etc. of these vehicles are spent from Corporation fund. When Executive is transferred from one branch to

another and other Executive is replaced in that place, the same driver continues to work. These drivers are given proper

I-cards by the Corporation. However, the drivers are not paid the salary at par with regular drivers working in the

Corporation and other benefits & allowances including PF, gratuity, bonus, washing allowances etc. Even then during

entire period of services of the concerned workmen with the Corporation, there is no complaint of their work, conduct,

character etc. and no complaint of any sort was ever received by them from the Executives and their family members.

They have thus worked for full satisfaction of the Corporation.

6.

It is then case of the union that due to request for regularization and taking up the matter through RLC,

through MbPT workers union, one of the workers Mr. Santosh Baburao Surve, who was working continuously for the

Corporation as driver from 30.8.97 would abruptly & arbitrarily terminated on 30.4.11 from service without any reason

4008

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

and without following any procedure. 7 other workmen were also regularized by the Corporation through back door

entry.

7.

According to the union, there exists regular work. There are many vacancies available for the post of drivers.

Many recruitments were made. Many employees were regularized. The concerned workmen performed the same kind

of work as the workmen directly employed by the principal employer. In view of that the concerned workmen are also

eligible for regularization and to receive regular wages that of the regular drivers engaged by the management.

8.

It is also the case of the concerned workmen that they are attending the perennial nature of work of the

management against the vacant post of drivers for considerable period of time but Corporation refused to regularize

these employees and refused to extend the benefits. The union is therefore asking for declaration to the effect that the

action of the management in not regularizing or absorbing the services of the concerned workmen with effect from their

joining services and discontinuation of service of driver Mr. Santosh Surve from 30.4.11 is illegal and unjustified.

They are also asking for giving directions to the management to regularize / absorb them in the capacity of permanent

drivers with effect from their joining the services of the management Corporation with all consequential benefits.

9.

First party management resisted claim by filing written statement Ex.8 contending therein that there is no

employer employee relationship between the Corporation and the concerned workmen. In the absence of master

servant relationship between the company and the said drivers the question of regularization of the services of the

concerned workmen as regular drivers does not arise.

10.

It is the case of the management that as a part of service conditions the senior Executives and branch

Managers are provided with only vehicles for their official as well as personal use. However, no drivers are provided

to these senior Executives and branch Managers by the company as they are not entitled for the privilege under

prevailing corporate policy. Senior Executives and branch Managers who have been allotted with the official vehicles

are eligible to engage the services of the drivers on their own and claim permissible reimbursement subject to limitation

stipulated in the company policy. The reimbursement are allotted on written declaration by the concerned officer

confirming the amount of actual expenses not exceeding the limits incurred by him on account of engagement of the

personal drivers. To engage a personal driver or not is at the sole discretion of the concerned executive. Personal

drivers engaged by the senior Executives and branch Managers have no connection whatsoever with the company.

There is no contract of service exists expressed or implied between the company and these drivers. The drivers are not

working under the supervision & control of the company. The salary, allowances, working hours and other service

conditions of the personal drivers are decided by the respective senior Executives and branch Managers and the

company has no role to play in these matters. These drivers are not interviewed, recommended or appointed by the

company. The company has neither obtained formal applications for jobs or recorded their personal information. As

such there is no privy of the contract between the company and these drivers. These drivers are never been given any

appointment letter by the company. As such drivers were never appointed as regular employees in accordance with

recruitment policy or selection procedure of the public sector undertaking.

11.

According to the management, company never issued any appointment letter to these drivers nor their names

are entered in the muster roll of the company. No service conditions of the company are applicable to them. They are

never been workmen of the company. As such there is no employer employee relationship between the concerned

workmen and the first party company.

12.

It is also case of the management that the other workmen whose services are regularized are the regular

employees of the company and their services were regularized till 2009 in a phased manner purely in accordance with

the procedure and policy of the company. So far concerned workmen, they cannot be equated to the regular employees

of the company since the terms & conditions of the engagement of the said employees are totally different. In the

absence of employer employee relationship there is no question of absorbing the concerned workmen in the services of

the company. It has thus sought the dismissal of the reference.

13.

Following issues are framed at Ex.9. I reproduce the issues along with my findings thereon for the reasons to

follow:

Sr. No.

Issues

Findings

1

Whether the demand of second party for regularization of the services of

Shri Santosh B. Surve and 13 other Drivers is legal and proper ?

No

2.

Whether the workmen under reference are entitled to be absorbed in the

service ?

No

3.

What relief the workmen are entitled to ?

No

4.

What order ?

As per final order

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

4009

Reasons

Issue No.1& 2.

14.

It is well settled principle of law that the person who sets up a plea of existence of relationship of employer

and employee the burden would be upon him. The burden of proof being the workmen to establish employer employee

relationship is on the workmen and therefore no adverse inference can be drawn against the employer that if he would

have produced the documents then the documents would have been proved employer employee relation. As per settled

position where the person asserts that he was the workmen of the company and it is denied by the company, it is for the

concerned workmen to prove the fact. It is not for the company to prove that he was not an employee of the company

but of some other person. The question whether relation between the parties is one of the employer & employee is a

pure question of fact. This is precisely the question of fact which has to be considered while deciding this issue on the

basis of evidence of the parties concerned.

15.

So far contentions go, it is the contention of the concerned workmen that they were working as drivers for the

senior Executives of the Corporation on full time basis. It is their contention that they are the direct employees of the

Corporation since the vehicle drivers used to drive are owned by the Corporation and petrol, maintenance etc. of these

vehicles are spent from the Corporation fund and even after the Executive is transferred the same driver continues to

work.

16.

As against this, it is the contention of the first party that the senior Executives and branch Managers have been

allotted with the official vehicles. They are eligible to engage the services of the drivers on their own and claim

permissible reimbursement. In view of this even it is admitted that the vehicles, drivers used to drive own by the

Corporation, the concerned drivers cannot claim their direct relationship as employer employee with the Corporation.

It is because it is not unusual for public sector undertaking to give allowances to its highly level officers leaving to

them to engage the services of the drivers or others for fulfilling the needs for which the allowances are meant. There

is nothing on record to make out the nexus between the Corporation and the concerned drivers. There is nothing on

record to indicate that control & directions of the drivers vested in the Corporation. In the absence of material to make

out that the concerned drivers were employed by the Corporation & was under its directions and control, were paid the

salary by the Corporation or otherwise were included in the army of employees of Corporation. It cannot be assumed

that there exists employer employee relationship between the Corporation and the concerned employees.

17.

On going through the record, it is clear that the concerned workmen have not adduced evidence nor filed

documents on record to prove their claim. Union remained absent and therefore in the absence of union, evidence of

the concerned workmen it will have to be said that the concerned workmen have not established that they are direct

employees of the company having controlled by the company and were paid by the company itself.

18.

Learned Counsel for the first party company pointed out that the contractor had agreed to provide car drivers

to the first party company in return for a fixed consideration. 7 of the drivers continued to be engaged as drivers of the

first party officials through the contractor and rest 7 drivers had already left the job. That would again show that the

concerned workmen were the employees of the contractor and as such there was no master servant relationship between

the first party company and the concerned drivers.

19.

Even then the concerned drivers have come out a case that 7 workmen were regularized through back door

entry by the management and this fact was brought to the notice before the ALC [C]. Contention is also to the fact that

many other vacancies are available for the post of drivers. Many recruitments are made, many employees are

regularized and in the circumstances it was for the Corporation to consider the services of the concerned workmen who

performed the same kind of work as the workmen, who are directly employed by the principal employer.

20.

Again the same finding holds good to consider that there is no iota of evidence or material on record to show

that there exists vacancies which were filled by the Corporation and as such there was discrimination while making the

appointments of the permanent drivers. In the absence of evidence, all these contentions of the concerned workmen

shall fall out.

21.

For want of evidence it will have to be said that the concerned workmen are not entitled for regularization of

the services. Their demand is not legal & proper. They are not entitled to be absorbed in service as they have not

established employer employee relationship in between them and the Corporation, the first party No.1. The above

issues are therefore answered accordingly as indicated against each of them in terms of above observations.

4010

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Issue No.3 & 4.

22.

In view of my findings to the issues, the workmen are not entitled to any relief. Hence the order.

ORDER

Reference is rejected with no order as to costs.

M.V. DESHPANDE, Presiding Officer

Dated,

09.3.2018.

ubZ fnYyh] 21 ebZ] 2018

dk-vk- 836-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj] Mkd?kj ds

v/h{kd] Mkd foHkkx] lqjsanzuxj (xqtjkr) ,oa muds deZpkjh ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqcaèk esa

fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k lhthvkbZVh,-

37/2013) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 23-04-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&40011@24@2012&vkbZvkj (Mh-;w-)º

jktsUnz tks'kh] mi funs'kd

New Delhi, the 21st May, 2018

S.O. 836.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. CGITA-37/2013) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Ahmedabad, as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the

Superintendent of Post Offices, Department of Posts, Surendranagar (Gujarat) and their workman, which was received

by the Central Government on 23.04.2018.

[No. L-40011/24/2012-IR (DU)]

RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present: Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad, Dated 03rd April, 2018

Reference: (CGITA) No- 37/2013

The Supdt. Of Post Offices,

Department of Posts,

Surendranagar Division,

Near Tower, 2nd Floor,

Surendranagar (Gujarat) – 363001

…First Party/Opponent

V/s

The President,

Association of Railway and Post Employees,

15, Shashi Apartments,

Bhatta Cross Road, Vasna,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380007

…Second Party/Applicant

For the First Party No

:

Shri P.M. Rami

For the Second Party :

Shri R.C. Pathak

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

4011

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-40011/

24/2012–IR(DU) dated 25.02.2013 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad

(Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of Superintendent of Post Offices, Surendranagar Division,

Surendranagar in withdrawing temporary status given to Shri Manubhai V. Rajgorw.e.f. 13.01.2011 is

justified? If not, what benefit Shri M.V. Rajgor is entitled on the basis of his services given to the

management?”

1. The reference dates back to 25.02.2013. The applicant/workman submitted the statement of claim Ex. 5

alleging that the applicant/workman was engaged as causal labour by the opposite party Superintendent of

Post Offices, Surendranagar Division, Surendranagar, since 01.09.1985 and he has been performing his duties

for 8 hours a day continuously with satisfaction to the opposite party with artificial rates to deprive him from

his legal rights in the service. The opposite party issued him an appointment letter to be appointed as EDA and

reduced his salary for 4 hours a day despite the fact that he was performing his duties for 8½ hours a day. He

has been continuously making request to be given the benefits of Group D, TS etc. The opposite party forcibly

took an undertaking which is nullity while granting the benefits of Group D vide office order dated

03/04.12.2009 and he was permitted to join the duty as Group D at Limbdi w.e.f. 10.12.2009. He has further

alleged that the opposite party withdrew his benefits of Group D and his salary was reduced from Rs. 8323/- to

Rs. 6344/- vide order dated 15.01.2011. The applicant/workman made the representation on 30.08.2011 and

01.06.2012 but to not result. Thus he has prayed for setting aside the order dated 13(15).01.2011 and has

prayed for grant of temporary status to the workman.

2. The opposite party submitted the written statement Ex. 6 denying the allegations made in the statement of

claim submitting that it is incorrect to say that he had been working 8 hours a day from 01.09.1985 to

15.12.1988. The submission of the applicant/workman is not correct and true. His submission regarding

engagement 8 hours daily from 01.09.1985 to 15.12.1988 is also not correct. As no recruitment/procedure was

observed while engaging the applicant. He was engaged in piecemeal basis against leave/vacancy of Group D

cadre and was engaged as outsider on rate applicable to casual labour as per the prevailing arrangement to

manage the work through short term leave/absentee’s arrangement of the regular Group D employee of

Sudamada SO. The opposite party further alleged that the submission of workman/applicant regarding

artificial break and appointment order as EDA and for reduced salary for 4 hours daily and as paying salary

for 4 hours only by the management and reported technique for depriving the right of the workman/applicant

etc. are not correct and true. The truth is that the workman was engaged as outsider/casual labour at Sudamada

SO vice Group D in short term leave/absentee during the year 1988. The post of GDS/MD-MC was created

w.e.f. 31.03.1989 at Ninama BO (under Sudamada SO). The local notification was issued by SDI(P) Limbdi to

fill up the post and copy of the same were given to all concerned i.e. Employment Exchange, Surendranagar,

Sarpanch, Talati cum Mantri, Head Master Primary School Ninama College etc. M.V. Rajgor applied for the

same and was selected for the post by the then SDI(P) and appointed at Limbdi vide Memo No.

PF/EDCA/DA/Ninama dated 03.07.1990. M.V. Rajgor is still working as GDS/MD-MC Ninama BO. Thus,

contention of the applicant is not correct that his duty hours were reduced from 8 hours to 4 hours by the

management. The opposite party further alleged that it is also not correct and true that he was performing duty

of 8 hours, prior to appointment in GDS/MD-MC Ninama BO w.e.f. 31.03.1989. In fact, in connection with to

grant of temporary status in Group D cadre vide application dated 21.11.2008 of the applicant was forwarded

to PMG Rajkot and as per PMG Rajkot letter No. R&E/2/MDC/2008 dated 28.04.2008/01.12.2008; it was

directed to decide the case at Divisional level being a Group D cadre case. The case was again refer to RO

Rajkot vide No. B2/Reptn/Misc/08 dated 08.02.2009 and the case again returned vide dated

R&E/2/MDC/2008 directing to decide the case at Divisional level. Therefore, the case was decided by the then

Superintendent of Post Offices, Surendranagar and granted temporary status in Group D cadre to the applicant

vide No. B2/Casual Labour/Ty. Status/9-10 dated 03.04.2009. Therefore, it was asked to RO Rajkot vide letter

no. STA-2/Rig-20/Corr/2009 dated 09.04.2009 to intimate the reason for granting temporary status, followed

by reminder dated 13.10.2010. A detailed report was submitted to the PMG Rajkot vide no. B2/Casual

Labour/Ty. Status/9-10 dated 23.10.2010. It was directed vide RO Rajkot letter no. STA-2/Rlg/20/Corr/2010

dated 11.01.2011 to cancel the orders of granting temporary status of M.V. Rajgor and to restore the status

quo. Therefore, the order of granted temporary status to Group D cadre dated 03.04.2009 was cancelled vide

no. B2/Cancel Labour/Ty. Status/09-10 dated 12.01.2011 and relieved the application for his post w.e.f.

15.01.2011. That temporary status was granted by the then SPOs Surendranagar in accordance with The

4012

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Directorate, New Delhi letter no. 45-95/8-SPB-1 dated 12.04.1991, further circulated under RO Rajkot Memo

NO. STA-2/PDR/Rlg-20/90 dated 30.04.1991. The applicant/workman never recruited in Group D cadre, after

observing due formalities under departmental rules and regulation for regular vacancy of Group D cadre, he

was engaged to manage the work for short term against leave/absentee of Group D, with clear instruction that,

there will be no claim for regular appointment/absorption in the Group D cadre. The allegation regarding

reduction of pay from Rs. 8323/- to Rs. 6344/- is also hereby denied and far from the truth. The applicant

engagement in GDS/MD-MC Ninama BO (under Sudamada SO) after observing due formalities of

recruitment in GDS cadre as per notification. M.V. Rajgor was applied for that post and was selected in

GDS/MD-MC at Ninama PO. There is no relevancy of prior engagement in Group D in short term

engagement at Sudamada SO with appointment as GDS/MD-MC Ninama BO in this case. Also the nature of

work of casual labour, Group D and GDS MD Ninama BO is quite different and hence allegations of the

workman are quite misleading one. The demand of the applicant for absorption in Group D cadre or to grant

the temporary status in Group D cadre has no merit. The applicant belongs to the GDS category and appointed

as GDS/MD Ninama BO (Sudamada SO) since 31.03.1989. His representation to grant of temporary status has

also no merit as per the instruction of the Directorates Memo No. 45-95/8-PSB-1 dated 12.04.1991 is

applicable to casual labour only not to GDS category. There are certain rules and regulations for recruitment

of Group D cadre. The applicant was not fulfilled the required qualification/eligibility for the Group D cadre

and therefore, his case is not admissible. The temporary status granted vides Office Memo No. B2/Casual

Labour/Ty. Status/10-11 dated 03.05.2009 was cancelled vide letter No. even dated 12.01.2011 in accordance

with PMG Rajkot Memo No. STA-2/Rlg-20/Corr./2010 dated 11.11.2011. The representation dated

31.01.2011 against the order of termination of temporary status to the DPS Rajkot was rejected as he was not

in employment as casual labour on 29.11.1989. Therefore, the applicant has represented to the PMG Rajkot

vide his application dated 17.05.2011 and same was rejected by PMG, Rajkot vide Memo No. STA-02/Rlg-

20/Corr/2011 dated 01.08.2011 that “The action of SPO Surendranagar to confer temporary status to Rajgor

was not in order, as he was not working as casual labour on 29.11.1989”. The request application dated

30.08.2011 addressed to the CPMG, Ahmedabad was not decided due to pending application with ALC,

Gandhidham in accordance with C.O. Memo No. STA/44-29/R/Corr/2012 dated 27.08.2012 and now pending

with CGIT, Ahmedabad. The opponent office is the office of the post department and as such it is not covered

under the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

3. On the basis of the pleadings, the following issues arise:

I.

Whether the action of the management of Superintendent of Post Offices, Surendranagar Division,

Surendranagar in withdrawing temporary status given to Manubhai V. Rajgor w.e.f. 13.01.2011 is

justified?

II.

To what benefit, if any, M.V. Rajgor is entitled on the basis of his services given to the management?

4. Both these issues are interrelated and are decided together.

5. Issue No. I and II: The burden of proof of these issues was lying on the workman who submitted his affidavit

Ex. 8 wherein he has reiterated the averments made in the statement of claim and has not said anything

contrary in his cross-examination. The opposite party filed the affidavit Ex. 9 of his witness Dilip Kumar

Mohan Lal Bhavsar who has also reiterated the averments made in the written statement Ex. 6 but in his cross-

examination, he has stated that temporary status was granted by one Atul Kumar Tiwari, the then

Superintendent of Post Office, Surendranagar without following the due procedure. The department after

deducting this irregularity did not take any action against Atul Kumar Tiwari. N.B. Kundari withdrew the

temporary status of this workman as no Departmental Promotion Committee was formed and there was not

such recommendation in the case of workman. It is true that no show-cause notice was given to the workman.

This workman moved a representation against demotion and withdrawal of temporary status which was

replaced before Reconciliation Officer. After withdrawal of temporary status on 11.01.2011, Departmental

Promotion Committee was held but he stated that he doesn’t remember the date of Departmental Promotion

Committee. This workman was considered in the next Departmental Promotion Committee as the workman

attained the age of 50 years but he doesn’t know the date of birth of this workman. Thus the cross-examination

reveals that the opposite party has failed to explain as to why this applicant/workman was not considered in

the next Departmental Promotion Committee and secondly, as to what action was taken against the then errant

Superintendent of Post Office who granted the temporary status to the applicant without following the due

procedure. The witness has also failed to explain as to what action was taken on the representation made by

the applicant/workman after withdrawal of the temporary status. Thus the cross-examination of the witness

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

4013

does not justify the withdrawal of the temporary status of the applicant/workman. Thus in the light of the

aforesaid evidence, I come to the conclusion that the withdrawal of temporary status of applicant/workman

Manubhai V. Rajgor was not justified and liable to be quashed and set aside. Thus the Issue No. I is decided in

negative and against the opposite party.

6. On the basis of the aforesaid findings, the order dated 13.01.2011 passed by Superintendent of Post Office,

Surendranagar Division regarding the withdrawal of the temporary status of the applicant/workman was

unjustified. The applicant/workman is entitled for the temporary status from the date it was withdrawn i.e.

13.01.2011.

7. The reference is disposed of accordingly. The first party is directed to restore temporary status of the

applicant/workman Manubhai V. Rajgor from the date it was withdrawn. The award shall be given effect

within 60 days from the publication of this award.

P.K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 21 ebZ] 2018

dk-vk- 837-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj] iQSDVjh

eSustj] jktuxj VsDlVkby feYl fyfeVsM] vgenkckn (xqtjkr) ,oa muds deZpkjh ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds

deZdkjksa ds chp vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn iapkV

(lanHkZ la[;k lhthvkbZVh,-33/2016) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 02-04-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&42012@47@2016&vkbZvkj (Mh-;w-)º

jktsUnz tks'kh] mi funs'kd

New Delhi, the 21st May, 2018

S.O. 837.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. CGITA-33/2016) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum

Labour Court, Ahmedabad, as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the

Factory Manager, Rajnagar Textile Mills Ltd., Ahmedabad (Gujarat) and their workman, which was received by the

Central Government on 02.04.2018.

[No. L-42012/47/2016-IR (DU)]

RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present: Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT cum Labour Court,

Ahmedabad, Dated 07th March, 2018

Reference: (CGITA) No- 33/2016

The Factory Manager,

Rajnagar Textile Mills Ltd. (A Unit of NTC),

Babupura Haripura, Asarwa,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380016

…First Party

V/s

Shri Ashok Parmar and others,

C/o Factory Manager,

Rajnagar Textiles Mills Ltd.,

Babupura Haripura, Asarwa,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

…Second Party

For the First Party : None

For the Second Party : None

4014

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-42012/

47/2016–IR(DU) dated 02.05.2016 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad

(Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the demands of Shri Ashok Parmar and 437 Badli workers against the management of Rajnagar

Textiles Mills Ltd., (A Unit of NTC), Ahmedabad for regularised in permanent service or with permanent pass

and for the demand of basic wage with DA as per BIR Cotton Textile Mill are justified? If so, then what relief

Shri Ashok Parmar and 437 workers are entitled to?”

1. The reference dates back to 02.05.2016. Notice Ex. 2 was sent to both the parties. Acknowledgement of notice

Ex. 3 to the first party was received but neither the acknowledgement of the notice nor the notice being served,

is received back for the second party. Thus the second party is also deemed served in the month of December,

2016 but despite a lapse of more than a year, neither of the parties has appeared nor filed their statement of

claim or written statement as the case may be.

2. Thus it appears that the second party is not willing to prosecute the case.

3. Thus the reference is disposed of in the absence of the statement of claim of the second party with the

observation as under: “the demands of Shri Ashok Parmar and 437 Badli workers against the management of

Rajnagar Textiles Mills Ltd., (A Unit of NTC), Ahmedabad for regularised in permanent service or with

permanent pass and for the demand of basic wage with DA as per BIR Cotton Textile Mill cannot be said to

be justified.”

P.K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 21 ebZ] 2018

dk-vk- 838-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj] nwjlapkj

ftyk vfHk;ark] nwjlapkj foHkkx] tkeuxj (xqtjkr) vkSj vU; ,oa muds deZpkjh ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa

ds chp vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn iapkV (lanHkZ

lhthvkbZVh, la[;k 1092/2004) çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 02-04-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&40012@52@1997&vkbZvkj (Mh-;w-)º

jktsUnz tks'kh] mi funs'kd

New Delhi, the 21st May, 2018

S.O. 838.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. CGITA No. 1092/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal

cum Labour Court, Ahmedabad, as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation

to the Telecom District Engineer, Telecom Department, Jamnagar (Gujarat) & others and their workman, which was

received by the Central Government on 02.04.2018.

[No. L-40012/52/1997-IR (DU)]

RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present: Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT cum Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 08th March, 2018

Reference: (CGITA) No- 1092/2004

1. The Telecom District Engineer,

Telecom Department,

Jamnagar (Gujarat) – 361001

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

4015

2. The Assistant Engineer,

Microwave Maintainance,

Khambalia – 361305

3. The Divisional Engineer,

Telecom Microwave Maintainance, K.R. Telephone Exchange,

Rajkot – 360001

4. The Divisional Engineer,

Telecom Microwave Maintainance,

K.R. Telephone Exchange,

Ahmedabad – 360001

…First Party

V/s

Ravidas Madhavdas Sarpadadia,

C/o Shri G.S. Uppal,

Plot No. 381,

Ward No. 2-B, Adipur,

Kutch (Gujarat) – 370205

…Second Party

For the First Party :

Shri N.K. Trivedi

For the Second Party :

None

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-40012/

52/97–IR(DU) dated 16.04.1998 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the Telecom District Engineer, Jamnagar/ Divisional Engineer, Telecom Microwave

Maintenance, Ahmedabad/Rajkot and Asstt. Engineer, Microwave Maintenance, Khambhalia, in not taking on

duties/discontinuance/terminating the services of Shri Ravidas Madhavdas Sarpadadia w.e.f. 02.01.1989 just,

valid and legal? If not, what benefits the workman is entitled for and what directions are necessary in the

matter?”

1. The reference dates back to 16.04.1998.The second party submitted the statement of claim Ex. 2 on

06.11.1999 alleging that he was appointed on 15.04.1987 as a casual labour and was terminated in 1989. He

worked for more than 240 days in each and every calendar year. He was not served any notice or paying notice

pay while terminating his services in the year 1989. He was terminated without any reason retaining the junior

workman in the service despite having seniority list of all the workmen.

2. The first party denied all the facts in the written statement Ex. 6 alleging that this workman challenged his

termination in the Central Administrative Tribunal vide OA No. 751 to 757 of 1988 along with number of

workmen wherein the Central Administrative Tribunal disposed of the aforesaid petitions observing that the

termination order was legal as respondents has offered compensation, therefore, respondents have paid the one

month pay.

3. The second party Ravidas Madhavdas Sarpadadia submitted his affidavit Ex. 21 admitting the facts that they

challenged the termination order in the Central Administrative Tribunal but refused to accept the

compensation amount of Rs. 922/- sent by the first party.

4. The first party submitted the affidavit of his witness Deepak Kantilal Shah reiterating the averments made in

the written statement.

5. The second party did not turn up and offered himself for cross-examination and also did not appear to cross-

examine the first party witness.

6. The judgement of the Central Administrative Tribunal in aforesaid petitions OA No. 751 to 757 of 1988 has

not been challenged in the higher court. Thus, it has attained the finality and cannot be adjudicated by this

tribunal being the res-judicata. Hence the reference has no force and liable to be dismissed.

7. This is the award of this tribunal that the reference is disposed of as per the observations above.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

4016

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ubZ fnYyh] 21 ebZ] 2018

dk-vk- 839-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj] ftyk

vfHk;ark] ch,l,u,y] ikyuiqj (chds) ,oa muds deZpkjh ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqcaèk esa

fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn iapkV (lanHkZ lhthvkbZVh, la[;k

1198/2004) çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 02-04-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&40011@35@2001&vkbZvkj (Mh-;w-)º

jktsUnz tks'kh] mi funs'kd

New Delhi, the 21st May, 2018

S.O. 839.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. CGITA No. 1198/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal

cum Labour Court, Ahmedabad, as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation

to the District Engineer, BSNL, Palanpur (B.K.) and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on

02.04.2018.

[No. L-40011/35/2001-IR (DU)]

RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present: Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT cum Labour Court,

Ahmedabad, Dated 08th March, 2018

Reference: (CGITA) No- 1198/2004

The District Engineer,

BSNL, O/o The General Manager Telecom District,

District Banaskantha,

Palanpur (B.K.) – 385001

…First Party

V/s

The President, Saurashtra Employees Unoin,

City Shops, 3rd Floor, Opp. Jagnath Police Chowky,

Dr. Yagnik Road, Rajkot (Gujarat) – 360001

…Second Party

For the First Party : Shri N.K. Trivedi

For the Second Party : Shri B.B. Gogia

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-40011/

35/2001–IR(DU) dated 21.05.2002 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad

(Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of Telecom Department, Palanpur to discontinue the services of

Shri Ajay Kumar Pal and not to give employment is justified or legal? If not, what relief the workman is

entitled for and since when?”

1. The reference dates back to 21.05.2002. After receiving the notice, the workman Ajay Kumar Pal, hereinafter,

referred to as “second party” submitted the statement of claim Ex. 2 alleging that he was appointed as a casual

labour by the The District Engineer, BSNL, O/o The General Manager Telecom District, District Banaskantha,

Palanpur, hereinafter, referred to as “first party” on 01.06.1989 and he continued to work till 30.09.1990.

Again he was allowed to work from 01.07.1995 till 01.06.1998 when his services were orally terminated

without following the pre-conditions of the Section 25 of the Industrial Disputes Act. He was allowed to work

from 01.08.1997 on voucher basis under SDO, Telephones, Palanpur but his name was not shown in the

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

4017

muster roll where he continued to work till 01.06.1998. All the details are submitted by him. On the above

details, it can be said that he worked continuously more than 240 days in the last preceding 12 months prior to

termination of his services w.e.f. 01.06.1989 which was illegal and void due to not following the procedure

given in Section 25 F of the Industrial Disputes Act. He has further alleged that a workman junior to him has

been retained in service and many of them have been regularised, thus it was violative of provisions of Section

25 G and H of the Industrial Disputes Act. He has further alleged that under the scheme of the Telecom

Department, he was entitled for the temporary status and also to be appointed as regular mazdoor which was

denied illegally with a malafide intention. Thus he has prayed for quashing the impugned termination order

and reinstatement with back wages.

2. The first party submitted the written statement Ex. 8 stating that the demand of the second party union is false,

concocted and against the provisions of law. The workman worked under The General Manager Telecom

District, District Banaskantha, Palanpur during the period stated in the statement of claim. Therefore, this

tribunal has no jurisdiction to adjudicate the matter. He had been working as a temporary daily wage basis

from 01.07.1989 and was given work according to the requirement of department as a unskilled labour and

was paid minimum wages according to Government Rules. The workman resumed duty on 01.07.1995 and

left the work in August, 1995 voluntarily. Thereafter, he worked for some time in the year 1997 and 1998. He

also moved to Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) where he was directed to approach the proper forum. It

is wrong to say that he was removed arbitrary and with a malafide intention.

3. All the documents referred in the statement of claim as well as in the written statement have been filed by the

respective parties.

4. On the basis of the pleading, the following issues arise:

i.

Whether the action of the management of Telecom Department, Palanpur to discontinue the services of

Shri Ajay Kumar Pal and not to give employment is justified or legal?

ii. If not, to what relief, if any, the workman is entitled for and since when?

5. As both the issues are interrelated, therefore, are decided together.

6. Issue No. i and ii: The burden of prove of these aforesaid issues was on the second party workman. The

workman Ajay Kumar Pal submitted his affidavit Ex. 14 reiterating the averments made in the statement of

claim Ex. 2. He has not said anything contrary to what he has stated in the affidavit.

7. The first party submitted the affidavit Ex. 16 of Lakhubhai Dosjibhai Deria, The Assistant General Manager in

the office of General Manager, Telecom, Palanpur, and he stated on oath that the workman was engaged as per

requirement of the department on need basis as daily wager on 01.07.1989. He worked for 178 days in the

year 1989, 337 days in the year 1990, 262 days in the year 1991, 277 days in the year 1992 and 56 days in the

year 1993 and thereafter left the work at his own accord. In the year 1994, he did not work but he worked for

52 days in the year 1995 and left the work again at his own accord. He was engaged in the year 1996.

Lakhubhai Dosjibhai Deria again stated that the workman worked for 137 days in the year 1997 and 128 days

in the year 1998 and again left the job at his own accord. Thus the concerned workman did not work for more

than 240 days during the tenure of his service during last 5 years. He was engaged without following due

procedure. The work assigned to the workman was not of permanent nature and the said work is now being

done by the labour contractor and the Central Government has imposed the ban on the engagement of

casual/daily wagers. The second party workman was paid remuneration on vouchers on the basis of his

attendance recorded in the muster roll. He was not entitled for any other benefits except wages. The second

party workman left the work at his own accord, hence, the question of issuing notice or paying retrenchment

or notice pay, did not arise. The workman was not following under the criteria of temporary status; therefore,

he was not absorbed. The other casual workers who were eligible were permitted to continue and the rest were

not re-engaged. This workman cannot be re-engaged as the said work now being done by the labour

contractor. Hence the dispute raised is liable to be dismissed. In his cross-examination, he has stated that the

workman from whom the work is taken on ACG 17 are separately registered and the salary is paid on

vouchers but he has not brought those vouchers. The workman was on muster roll up to 1993, thereafter on

ACG 17. The workman was working as a labour for digging the trench. He has further stated that a workman,

who has worked for more than 240 days, would have the temporary status. He can produced the attendance

record of the second party if available prior to 01.06.1998. The second party workman has worked for more

than 240 days in some of the years but he did not work for more than 240 days in the preceding year to the

date 01.06.1998. He was not given any notice or notice pay.

8. The second party has referred Devinder Singh V/s Municipal Counsel, Sanaur, 2011 Law Suit (SC) 475,

wherein the apex court confirmed the order of reinstatement of the workman by the Labour Court wherein the

4018

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

workman worked for more than 240 days in the calendar year preceding the termination of his service from

the date w.e.f. 30.09..1996 without complying the mandatory provisions of Section 25 F of the Industrial

Disputes Act. He has also referred Jasbir Singh V/s State of Haryana, Civil Appeal Number 346 of 2015

(Arising out of SLP (C) No. 1532 of 2014), wherein the apex court confirmed the award of Industrial

Tribunal-cum-Labour Court reinstating the workman on the ground that the services of the workman were

terminated on 31.12.1993 without complying the mandatory provisions of Section 25 F, G and H of the

Industrial Disputes Act. He has further referred Deepali Gundu Surwase V/s Kranti Junior Adhyapak

Mahavidyalaya and other, 2013 Law Suit (SC) 994. The said judgement relates to a case where the Head

Mistress of the Vidyalaya address a letter to all the teachers to contribute Rs. 1500/- per month towards the tax

liability which the appellant refused, consequently, the management issued 25 Memo to the appellant and put

him under suspension. The apex court ordered reinstatement, confirming the order of the tribunal. As the facts

of this judgement are different to this case, hence no applicability in the case. He has further referred an old

case of the apex court Surendra Kumar Verma V/s Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, New Delhi, 1980 Law Suit (SC) 412, wherein the apex court observed that the provisions Section 25

B(2) of the Industrial Dispute Act, are plain enough and are reproduced as under:

“[25 B. Definition of continuous service – For the purposes of this Chapter,-

(1) A workman shall be said to be in continuous service for a period if he is, for that period, in uninterrupted

service, including service which may be interrupted on account of sickness or authorised leave or an

accident or a strike which is not illegal, or a lock-out or a cessation of work which is not due to any fault

on the part of the workman;

(2) Where a workman is not in continuous service within the meaning of clause (1) for a period of one year or

six months, he shall be deemed to be in continuous service under an employer-

(a) For a period of one year, if the workman, during a period of twelve calendar months preceding the

date with reference to which calculation is to be made, has actually worked under the employer for

not less than-

(i)

One hundred and ninety days in the case of a workman employed below ground in a mine;

and

(ii)

Two hundred and forty days, in any other case;

(b) For a period of six month, if the workman, during a period of six calendar months preceding the date

with reference to which calculation is to be made, has actually worked under the employer for not

less than-

(i)

Ninety-five days, in the case of workman employed below ground in a mine; and

(ii)

One hundred and twenty days, in any other case.

Explanation – for the purposes of clause (2), the number of days on which a workman has actually worked under an

employer shall include the days on which-

(i) He has been laid-off under an agreement or as permitted by standing orders made under the Industrial

Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 (20 of 1946), or under the act or under any other law applicable to

the industrial establishment;

(ii) He has been on leave with full wages, earned in the previous years;

(iii) He has been absent due to temporary disablement caused by accident arising out of and in the course of his

employment; and

(iv) In the case of a female, she has been on maternity leave; so, however, that the total period of such maternity

leave does not exceed twelve weeks.]”

It is further observed by the apex court that under Section 25 F, the workman should be in continuous service

for not less than one year under an employer and under Section 25 B(2), even if a workman has not been in

continuous service under an employer for a period of one year, he shall deemed to have been in such

continuous service for a period of one year if he has actually worked under the employer for 240 days in the

preceding period of 12 month. There is no stipulation that he should have been in employment or service

under the employer for a whole period of 12 months. The apex court allowed all the appeals and reinstated the

appellants without full back wages in all those appeals where the workmen have worked for 240 days in the

period of 12 months. It is not necessary that he should have been in the service of employer for one whole

year.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

4019

9. In the present case, it is an admitted fact that the second party workman worked for 178 days in the year 1989,

337 days in the year 1990, 262 days in the year 1991, 277 days in the year 1992 and 56 days in the year 1993

and thereafter left the work at his own accord. In the year 1994, he did not work. But he worked for 52 days in

the year 1995 and left the work again at his own accord. He was engaged in the year 1996. He again stated that

the workman worked for 137 days in the year 1997 and 128 days in the year 1998. The only issue is that he

worked for more than 240 days in some of the years.

10. Though the learned counsel of the first party has referred Himanshu Kumar Vidharthi V/s State of Bihar, 1997

(76) FLR SC Page 237, wherein the apex court has observed as under:

“Admittedly, they were not appointed to the posts in accordance with the rules but were engaged on the basis

of need of the work. They are temporary employees working on daily wages. Under these circumstances, their

disengagement from service cannot be construed to be a retrenchment under the Industrial Disputes Act. The

concept of “retrenchment”, therefore, cannot be stretched to such an extent as to cover these employees. Since

they are only daily-wage employees and have no right to the posts, their disengagement is not arbitrary.”

The first party has further referred Kendriya Vidyalaya Sanghathan and Anr. V/s S.C. Sharma, (2005) LLR SC

275, wherein the apex court has observed as under:

“For dispensation of holding of an enquiry before termination of an employee, it is imperative for the

employer to record a conclusion that it was not reasonably practicable to hold the enquiry proceedings even

when the employee was absconding and not responding to the notices as such his termination sans enquiry

will be set aside.

For entitlement of back wages on reinstatement of an employer, the initial burden lies upon the employee that

he was not gainfully employed and thereafter the employer can rebut the same.

When the employee as directed to be reinstated in service with back wages by the Tribunals and High Court,

he will not be entitled to back wages since he has neither pleaded nor placed any material that he was not

gainfully employed.”

11. The main argument of the advocate for the first party is that the workman left the job at his own accord;

therefore, he cannot take advantage of his own fault. But the first party has not submitted the attendance

register/muster roll of the questioned period which may established the willingly leaving the job by the

workman. The reference is of 21.05.2002 and the workman served the first party from 1989 to 1998. The

workman has not disclosed in his evidence as to who the junior workers were engaged or re-engaged but it has

also not been specifically denied by the first party. The workman must have attained the age of 30 years in the

year 2003, now he would have attained the age of 45 years, so it cannot be said that he has lost his utility in

the service.

12. It is established in the absence of the evidence by the first party that the workman was retrenched without

giving notice and notice pay. Thus the reference deserves to be allowed. As the first party witness has

admitted that the workmen, who served for 240 days, are granted temporary status, same shall be given in this

case. Therefore, the second party workman Ajay Kumar Pal shall be reinstated in service without paying back

wages on the principle of “no work no pay”. Both the issues are decided in the light of the aforesaid

observations and the first party is directed to reinstate the second party workman within 60 days from the

publication of this award.

13. The award is passed accordingly.

P.K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 21 ebZ] 2018

dk-vk- 840-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj] egkizca/d

(iQksu)] nwjlapkj foHkkx] jktdksV (xqtjkr) vkSj muds deZpkjh vkSj vU; ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp

vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn iapkV (lanHkZ (lhthvkbZVh,)

la--1018/2004) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 02-04-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&40012@80@1994&vkbZvkj (Mh-;w-)º

jktsUnz tks'kh] mi funs'kd

4020

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 21st May, 2018

S.O. 840.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. (CGITA) No.-1018/2004) of the Central Government Industrial

Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in

relation to the General Manager (Phones), Telecom Department, Rajkot (Gujarat) and their workman & Other, which

was received by the Central Government on 02.04.2018.

[No. L-40012/80/1994-IR (DU)]

RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present: Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT cum Labour Court,

Ahmedabad, Dated 15th March, 2018

Reference: (CGITA) No.- 1018/2004

The General Manager (Phones),

Department of Telecom,

Behind Girnar Talkies,

Rajkot (Gujarat)

…First Party

V/s

1. Shri Popatlal Dudabhai Tank,

Baroda Pristege, Jagdishnagar,

Mohanbhai Zarkiy Building, Gala No. 2,

Surat (Gujarat)

2. The President,

Saurashtra Employees Union,

City Shops, Dr. Yagnik Road,

Opp. Jagnath Police Chowki,

Rajkot (Gujarat)

…Second Party

For the First Party : Shri H.R. Raval

For the Second Party : Adv. K.L. Kalwani

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order

No. L-40012/80/94–IR(DU) dated 28.08.1996 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of General Manager (Phones), Department of Telecom, Behind

Girnar Cinema, Rajkot – 360001, in terminating the services of Shri Popatlal D. Tank, Casual Labourer is

legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled to?”

1. The reference dates back to 28.08.1996. Both the parties submitted their statement of claim and written

statement on 13.04.1998 and 29.07.1998 respectively along with number of documents. The case was listed

for hearing but since then second party has been absent and has refrained to appear before the tribunal for

hearing. Today on 15.03.2018, the advocate for the second party workman Mrs. K.L. Kalwani stated that the

workman has not been in her contact since long.

2. Thus it appears that the second party workman is not willing to prosecute the case.

3. Thus the reference is finally disposed of in the absence of the evidence of the second party workman with the

observation as under: “the action of the management of General Manager (Phones), Department of Telecom,

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

4021

Behind Girnar Cinema, Rajkot – 360001, in terminating the services of Shri Popatlal D. Tank, Casual

Labourer can be said to be legal and justified.”

P.K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 21 ebZ] 2018

dk-vk- 841-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj] egkizca/d

nwjlapkj foHkkx] jktdksV (xqtjkr) ,oa muds deZpkjh ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V

vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn iapkV (lanHkZ (lhthvkbZVh,) la[;k-

1098/2004) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 02-04-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&40012@21@1997&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)º

jktsUnz tks'kh] mi funs'kd

New Delhi, the 21st May, 2018

S.O. 841.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. (CGITA) No.-1098/2004) of the Central Government Industrial

Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in

relation to the General Manager, Telecom Department, Rajkot (Gujarat) and their workman, which was received by the

Central Government on 02.04.2018.

[No. L-40012/21/1997-IR (DU)]

RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present: Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT cum Labour Court,

Ahmedabad, Dated 08th March, 2018

Reference: (CGITA) No.- 1098/2004

The General Manager,

Telecom Department,

3rd Floor, Umesh Commercial Complex,

Near Chaudhary High School,

Rajkot (Gujarat) – 360001

…First Party

V/s

Shri Kiritkumar Bhanushankar Pandya,

Gaikwadi, 1/10, Rajkot (Gujarat) – 360001

…Second Party

For the First Party : Shri H.R. Raval

For the Second Party : Adv. K.L. Kalwani

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order

No. L-40012/21/97–IR(DU) dated 13.05.1998 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of The General Manager, Telecom Deptt., Rajkot in terminating the

services of Shri K.B. Pandya is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled?”

1. The reference dates back to 13.05.1998. Both the parties submitted their statement of claim and written

statement along with number of documents. The case was listed for evidence of second party but the second

party failed to appear for his cross examination on his affidavit Ex. 12 by which his examination chief was

recorded on 24.04.2002. The second party also has been absent since last several dates for cross examination.

4022

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Today on 08.03.2018, the advocate for the second party workman Mrs. K.L. Kalwani stated that the workman

has not been in her contact since long.

2. Thus it appears that the second party workman is not willing to prosecute the case.

3. Thus the reference is finally disposed of in the absence of the evidence of the second party workman with the

observation as under: “the action of the management of The General Manager, Telecom Deptt., Rajkot in

terminating the services of Shri K.B. Pandya can be said to be legal and justified.”

P.K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 21 ebZ] 2018

dk-vk- 842-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj] fMohtuy

bathfu;j] VsyhdkWe ekbØksoso izkstsDV] jktdksV (xqtjkr) vkSj vU; ,oa muds deZpkjh ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds

deZdkjksa ds chp vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn iapkV

(lanHkZ (lhthvkbZVh,) la[;k-1147/2004) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 02-04-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&40012@42@1998&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)º

jktsUnz tks'kh] mi funs'kd

New Delhi, the 21st May, 2018

S.O. 842.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. (CGITA) No.-1147/2004) of the Central Government Industrial

Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in

relation to the Divisional Engineer, Telecom Microwave Project, Rajkot (Gujarat) & Other and their workman, which

was received by the Central Government on 02.04.2018.

[No. L-40012/42/1998-IR (DU)]

RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present: Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT cum Labour Court,

Ahmedabad, Dated 08th March, 2018

Reference: (CGITA) No.- 1147/2004

1. The Divisional Engineer,

Telecom, Microwave Project,

Rajkot (Gujarat) – 360001

2. The Sub-Divisional Officer,

Telegraphs, Microwave Maintenance,

Jamnagar (Gujarat) – 361001

…First Party

V/s

The President,

Saurashtra Employees Union,

Umesh Commercial Complex, 2nd Floor, Office No. 213 and 214,

Near Chaudhary High School,

Rajkot (Gujarat) – 360001

…Second Party

For the First Party : Shri N.K. Trivedi

For the Second Party : Adv. K.L. Kalwani

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 26] 2018@T;s"B 5] 1940

4023

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order

No. L-40012/42/98–IR(DU) dated 30.11.1998 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the Divisional Engineer, Telecom Microwave Project, Rajkot in terminating the

services of Shri Kishoregiri Vajugiri Aparnathi, Casual Labour is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the

workman is entitled?”

1. The reference dates back to 30.11.1998. Both the parties submitted their statement of claim and written

statement along with number of documents. The case was listed for evidence of second party but he has been

absent since last several dates for submitting his evidence.

2. Today on 08.03.2018, the advocate for the second party workman Mrs. K.L. Kalwani stated that the workman

has not been in her contact since long. Thus it appears that the second party workman is not willing to

prosecute the case.

3. Thus the reference is finally disposed of in the absence of the evidence of the second party workman with the

observation as under: “the action of the Divisional Engineer, Telecom Microwave Project, Rajkot in

terminating the services of Shri Kishoregiri Vajugiri Aparnathi, Casual Labour can be said to be legal and

justified.”

P.K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 21 ebZ] 2018

dk-vk- 843-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj] egkizca/d

ch,l,u,y] jktdksV (xqtjkr) vkSj vU; ,oa muds deZpkjh ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqcaèk esa

fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn iapkV (lanHkZ (lhthvkbZVh,) la[;k-

107/2007) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 02-04-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&40012@42@2007&vkbZvkj (Mh;w)º

jktsUnz tks'kh] mi funs'kd

New Delhi, the 21st May, 2018

S.O. 843.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. (CGITA) No.-107/2007) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation

to the General Manager, BSNL, Rajkot (Gujarat) and their workman, which was received by the Central Government

on 02.04.2018.

[No. L-40012/42/2007-IR (DU)]

RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present: Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT cum Labour Court,

Ahmedabad, Dated 15th March, 2018

Reference: (CGITA) No.- 107/2007

1. The General Manager,

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited,

Telecom Distt., Near Girnar Talkies,

Rajkot (Gujarat)

2. The Sub-Divisional Engineer,

Department of Telecom,

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, Jasdan

…First Party

4024

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

V/s

The Joint Secretary,

Saurashtra Employees Union,

City Shops, Dr. Yagnik Road,

Opp. Jagnath Polic Chowki,

Rajkot (Gujarat)

…Second Party

For the First Party : Shri H.R. Raval

For the Second Party : Adv. K.L. Kalwani

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order

No. L-40012/42/2007–IR(DU) dated 09.10.2007 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited in terminating the services of their

workman Shri Vinod B. Kiri, w.e.f. 12.12.2005 is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is

entitled?”

1. The reference dates back to 09.10.2007. Both the parties submitted their statement of claim Ex. 9 and written

statement Ex. 13 on 30.09.2008 and 24.04.2009 respectively along with number of documents. The case was

listed for evidence of second party but since then second party has been absent and has refrained to lead

evidence. Today on 15.03.2018, the advocate for the second party workman Mrs. K.L. Kalwani stated that the

workman has not been in her contact since long.

2. Thus it appears that the second party workman is not willing to prosecute the case.

3. Thus the reference is finally disposed of in the absence of the evidence of the second party workman with the

observation as under: “the action of the management of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited in terminating the

services of their workman Shri Vinod B. Kiri, w.e.f. 12.12.2005 can be said to be legal and justified.”

P.K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

Uploaded by Dte. of Printing at Government of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi-110064

and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi-110054. ALOK

KUMAR

Digitally signed

by ALOK KUMAR

Date: 2018.06.16

11:37:04 +05'30'