3128 GI/2018

(4215)

jftLVªh la- Mh- ,y- (,u) 04@0007@2003µ05

REGD. No. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05

izkf/dkj ls izdkf'kr

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

lkIrkfgd

WEEKLY

la- 23]

ubZ fnYyh] twu 10—twu 16] 2018] 'kfuokj@T;s"B 20—T;s"B 26] 1940

No. 23]

NEW DELHI, JUNE 10—JUNE 16, 2018, SATURDAY/JYAISTHA 20—JYAISTHA 26, 1940

bl Hkkx esa fHkUu i`"B la[;k nh tkrh gS ftlls fd ;g i`Fkd ladyu ds :i esa j[kk tk lds

Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

Hkkx II—[k.M 3—mi&[k.M (ii)

PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)

Hkkjr ljdkj ds ea=kky;ksa (j{kk ea=kky; dks NksM+dj) }kjk tkjh fd, x, lkafof/d vkns'k vkSj vf/lwpuk,a

Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India

(Other than the Ministry of Defence)

fons'k ea=kky;

(lh-ih-oh- izHkkx)

ubZ fnYyh] 31 ebZ] 2018

dk-vk- 927-—jktuf;d vkSj dksalqyh; vf/dkjh ('kiFk ,oa iQhl) ds vf/fu;e] 1948 (1948 dk 41) dh /kjk 2 ds [akM

(d) ds vuqlj.k esa oS/kfud vkns'k A

,rn~}kjk] dsaæ ljdkj Hkkjr ds nwrkokl] eLdr esa Jh lks.kh tksliQ] lgk;d vuqHkkx vf/dkjh dks fnukad 31 ebZ] 2018 ls

lgk;d dksalqyj vf/dkjh ds rkSj ij dksalqyj lsokvksa ds fuoZgu ds fy, izkfèkÑr djrh gS A

¹la- Vh&4330@01@2016º

izdk'k pUn] funs'kd (dksalqyj)

MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS

(C.P.V. DIVISION)

New Delhi, the 31st May, 2018

S.O. 927.—Statutory Order in pursuance of clause (a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular Officers

(Oaths and Fees) Act, 1948 (41 of 1948), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Sonny Joseph, Assistant Section

Officer as Assistant Consular Officer in Embassy of India, Muscat to perform the Consular services with effect from

31st May, 2018.

[No. T-4330/01/2016]

PRAKASH CHAND, Director (Consular)

4216

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 16, 2018/JYAISTHA 26, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ubZ fnYyh] 31 ebZ] 2018

dk-vk- 928-—jktuf;d vkSj dksalqyh; vf/dkjh ('kiFk ,oa iQhl) ds vf/fu;e] 1948 (1948 dk 41) dh /kjk 2 ds [akM

(d) ds vuqlj.k esa oS/kfud vkns'k A

,rn~}kjk] dsaæ ljdkj Hkkjr ds mPpk;ksx] nkj&,&lyke esa Jh ukpksUlks] lgk;d vuqHkkx vf/dkjh dks fnukad 31 ebZ] 2018 ls

lgk;d dksalqyj vf/dkjh ds rkSj ij dksalqyj lsokvksa ds fuoZgu ds fy, izkfèkÑr djrh gS A

¹la- Vh&4330@06@2018º

izdk'k pUn] funs'kd (dksalqyj)

New Delhi, the 31st May, 2018

S.O. 928.—Statutory Order in pursuance of clause (a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular Officers

(Oaths and Fees) Act, 1948 (41 of 1948), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Ngachonso, Assistant Section

Officer as Assistant Consular Officer in High Commission of India, Dar-es-Salaam to perform the Consular services with

effect from 31st May, 2018.

[No. T-4330/06/2018]

PRAKASH CHAND, Director (Consular)

ubZ fnYyh] 1 twu] 2018

dk-vk- 929-—jktuf;d vkSj dksalqyh; vf/dkjh ('kiFk ,oa iQhl) ds vf/fu;e] 1948 (1948 dk 41) dh /kjk 2 ds [akM

(d) ds vuqlj.k esa oS/kfud vkns'k A

,rn~}kjk] dsaæ ljdkj Hkkjr ds mPpk;ksx] foDVksfj;k esa Jherh vkjrh frokjh] lgk;d vuqHkkx vf/dkjh dks fnukad

1 twu] 2018 ls lgk;d dksalqyj vf/dkjh ds rkSj ij dksalqyj lsokvksa ds fuoZgu ds fy, izkfèkÑr djrh gS A

¹la- Vh&4330@05@2018º

izdk'k pUn] funs'kd (dksalqyj)

New Delhi, the 1st June, 2018

S.O. 929.—Statutory Order in pursuance of clause (a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular Officers

(Oaths and Fees) Act, 1948 (41 of 1948), the Central Government hereby appoints Smt. Arti Tiwari, Assistant Section

Officer as Assistant Consular Officer in High Commission of India, Victoria to perform the Consular services with effect

from 1st June, 2018.

[No. T-4330/05/2018]

PRAKASH CHAND, Director (Consular)

dkfeZd] yksd f’kdk;r rFkk isa’ku ea=ky;

¼dkfeZd vkSj izf’k{k.k foHkkx½

ubZ fnYyh] 15 ekpZ] 2018

dk-vk- 930.—कीय सरकार, दंड या संिहता, 1973 (1974 का अिधिनयम सं0 2) क धारा 24 क उपधारा (8) $ारा

द% शि'य( का योग करते ,ए, .ी मनोहरन पी., अिधव1 ता को, केरल रा3 य और ल5$ीप संघ रा3 य5े7 म द8 ली िवशेष पुिलस

9 थापन (के; ीय अ; वेषण > यूरो) $ारा संि9थत अपील(, पुनरी5ण( और उससे संबंिधत और उसके आनुषंिगक अ;य मामल( का संचालन के

िलए, िनयुि' क तारीख से तीन वषE के िलए या अगले आदेश तक, इनम से जो भी पूवEतर हो, िवशेष लोक अिभयोजक के Iप म िनयु1 त

करती है ।

[Qk- la- 225@24@2017&,ohMh&II]

,l- ih- vkj- f=ikBh] voj lfpo

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 16] 2018@T;s"B 26] 1940

4217

MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS

(Department of Personnel and Training)

New Delhi, the 15th March, 2018

S.O. 930.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (8) of section 24 of the Code of Criminal

Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Manoharan P. Advocate, as a Special Public

Prosecutor for conducting prosecution of cases instituted by Delhi Special Police Establishment in the State of Kerala

and Union territory of Lakshadweep as entrusted to him by the Central Bureau of Investigation in the trial courts,

appeals, revisions and other matters arising out of these cases in Revisional or Appellate Courts established by law, for a

period of three years from the date of appointment or further orders whichever is earlier.

[F.No. 225/24/2017-AVD-II]

S. P. R. TRIPATHI, Under Secy.

नई द8 ली, 5 जून, 2018

का

का.आ.

.आ.

.आ. 931

931

931.—के; सरकार, एतKारा द8 ली िवशेष पुिलस 9 थापना अिधिनयम, 1946 (1946 का अिधिनयम संL या 25) क

धारा 6 के साथ पMठत धारा 5 क उपधारा (1) $ारा द% शि'य( का योग करते ,ए मO य देश रा3 य सरकार क अिधसूचना

सं. F-12-28/2017/b-1/TWO दनांक 02.03.2017 के माO यम से ाP त सहमित से फेडरेशन ऑफ डेयरी कोऑपरेMटव एसोिसयेशन

ऑफ इबाराक (FDCAI) पीएचपी फाइल( को सवEर म P लांट करने के िलए सवEर कंP यूटर तक अनािधकृत ए1 सेस और संयु1 त राU V म

ि9थत िवW तीय सं9 थान( के िवI$ DDoS Attack करने के िलए एक के; के Iप से तैयार कया और इस कार सूचना ौZोिगक

अिधिनयम, 2000 क धारा 43 के साथ पMठत धारा 66 के सदृश जापान के अनािधकृत कंP यूटर ए1 सेस िनषेध अिधिनयम के अनु[ छेद 2-

4, अनु[ छेद 3 एवं अनु[ छेद 11 का उ8 लंघन कया और FDCAI को 5ित प,ंचाने से संबंिधत िविधक सहायता के िलए जापान दूतावास,

नई द8 ली तथा िवदेश मं7ालय, नई द8 ली/गृह मं7ालय, नई द8 ली के माO यम से राU Vीय पुिलस एजे; सी से ाP त अनुरोध प7 (नोट वब^ल

सं. 1/67/14 दनांक 19.02.2014) क जांच करने के िलए तथा उ1 त मामले से स_ ब` अपराध( म कए गए यास(, दुU ेरणाa और

षbं7( तथा उसी संc यवहार म कए गए या उ; हd तe य( से उW प; न ासंिगक अ; य अपराध( क जांच करने के िलए द8 ली िवशेष पुिलस

9 थापना के सद9 य( क शि'य( और 5े7ािधकार का सम9 त मO य देश रा3 य म िव9 तार करती है ।

[फा. सं. 228/82/2014-एवीडी-II]

एस. पी. आर. ि7पाठी, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 5th June, 2018

S.O. 931.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi

Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (Act No. 25 of 1946), the Central Government with the consent of State

Government of Madhya Pradesh issued vide Notification No.F-12-28/2017/B-1/TWO dated 02.03.2017 hereby extends

the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment in the whole of the State of

Madhya Pradesh for investigation in respect of execution of Letters Rogatory received from the National Police Agency

Japan through Embassy of Japan, New Delhi (Note Verbale No. 1/67/14 dated 19.02.2014) and Ministry of External

Affairs, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi for legal assistance relating to a case of violation of the Act on the

Prohibition of unauthorized access to the server computer of the Federation of Dairy Co-operative Association of Ibaraki

(FDCAI) planting PHP files in the server, and made it as a Springboard to make DDoS Attack against financial

institutions located in the United States and thus caused damage to FDCAI which correspond to violation of article 2-4,

article 3 and article 11 of Act on the Prohibition of Unauthorized Computer Access of Japan corresponding to section 43

r/w section 66 of Information Technology Act, 2000 and any other offence(s), attempt(s), abetments and conspiracies in

relation to or in connection with above mentioned offence and any other offence or offences committed in the course of

the same transaction arising out of the same facts.

[F. No. 228/82/2014-AVD-II]

S. P. R. TRIPATHI, Under Secy.

'kqf¼i=k

ubZ fnYyh] 5 twu] 2018

dk-vk- 932-—dsUnz ljdkj ,rn~}kjk fnYyh fo'ks"k iqfyl LFkkiu vf/fu;e] 1946 (1946 dk vf/fu;e la- 25) dh /kjk 6

ds lkFk ifBr /kjk 5 dh mi&/kjk (1) }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, fcgkj jkT; ljdkj ds x`g foHkkx dh vf/lwpuk la-

4218

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 16, 2018/JYAISTHA 26, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

8@lhchvkbZ&80&05@2007 ,pih&6888@iVuk fnukad 24-08-2017 esa tkjh 'kqf¼i=k la[;k 8@lhchvkbZ&80&05@2007 ,pih&3253@iVuk

fnukad 17-04-2018 ds ekè;e ls izkIr lgefr ls viuh vf/lwpuk ,iQ- la- 228@02@2018&,ohMh&II fnukad

19-03-2018 esa fuEufyf[kr 'kqf¼i=k tkjh djrk gS A

mijksDr vf/lwpuk fnukad 19-03-2018 esa ¶Hkkxyiqj ,oa lgjlk esa ljdkjh cSad [kkrksa¸ dks ¶Hkkxyiqj ,oa ckadk esa ljdkjh cSad

[kkrs¸ i<+k tk,xk A

mijksDr vf/lwpuk fnukad 19-03-2018 dh 'ks"k varoZLrq ;Fkkor jgsxh A

[iQk- la- 228@02@2018&,ohMh&II]

,l- ih- vkj- f=kikBh] voj lfpo

CORRIGENDUM

New Delhi, the 5th June, 2018

S.O. 932.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi

Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (Act No. 25 of 1946), the Central Government with the consent of State

Government of Bihar, Home Department, issued vide Corrigendum No. 8/C.B.I.-80-05/2017 HP-3253 Patna Dated

17.04.2018 issued in Notification No. 8/C.B.I.-80-05/2017 HP-6888 Patna Dated 24.08.2017, hereby issues the following

Corrigendum in it Notification F.No. 228/02/2018-AVD-II dated 19.03.2018 :

“Government Bank Accounts in Bhagalpur and Saharsa” in the aforesaid Notification dated 19.03.2018 shall be

read as “Government Bank Accounts in Bhagalpur and Banka”.

Remaining contents of aforesaid Notification dated 19.03.2018 shall remain the same.

[F. No. 228/02/2018-AVD-II]

S. P. R. TRIPATHI, Under Secy.

नई द8 ली, 6 जून, 2018

का

का.आ.

.आ.

.आ. 933

933

933.—के; सरकार एतKारा द8 ली िवशेष पुिलस 9 थापना अिधिनयम, 1946 (1946 का अिधिनयम संL या 25) क

धारा 6 के साथ पMठत धारा 5 क उपधारा (1) $ारा द% शि'य( का योग करते ,ए ि7पुरा रा3 य सरकार, गृह िवभाग अगरतला क

अिधसूचना सं. एफ.21(2)-पीडी/12(पी)/873 दनांक 17.03.2018 के माO यम से ाh सहमित से सुदीप द%ा भौिमक, सयनदान पि7का

के प7कार, अगरतला क हWया के संबंध म भारतीय दंड संिहता क धारा 302/120बी, 1860(1860 का अिधिनयम संLया 45), तथा

आयुध अिधिनयम क धारा 27 के अंतगEत, बोधज(ग नगर पुिलस थाना मामला संLया 2017/बीजेएन/50, दनांक 21.11.2017 म

अ;वेषण के िलए तथा उ1 त मामले म भारतीय दंड संिहता म वणjत एक अथवा एक से अिधक अपराध( से स_ ब` म कए गए यास(,

दुU ेरणाa और षbं7( तथा उसी संc यवहार म कए गए या उ; हd तe य( से उW प; न ासंिगक कोई अ; य अपराध अथवा अपराध( क जांच

करने के िलए द8 ली िवशेष पुिलस 9 थापना के सद9 य( क शि'य( और 5े7ािधकार का िव9 तार सम9 त ि7पुरा रा3 य म करती है ।

[फा. सं. 228/15/2018-एवीडी-II]

एस. पी. आर. ि7पाठी, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 6th June, 2018

S.O. 933.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi

Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (Act No. 25 of 1946), the Central Government with the consent of State

Government of Tripura, Home Department issued vide Notification No. F.21(2)-PD/12(P)/873 dated Agartala,

17.03.2018, hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment in the

whole of the State of Tripura for investigation in the Bodhjong Nagar PS Case No. 2017/BJN/50 dated 21.11.2017 U/s

302/120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860(Act No. 45 of 1860), and 27 of Arms Act in connection with the death of

Sudip Datta Bhowmik, a reporter of the Syandan Patrika, Agartala and attempts, abetments and conspiracies in relation to

or in connection with one or more of the offences mentioned in the Indian Penal Code and any other offence or offences

committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the said facts.

[F. No. 228/15/2018-AVD-II]

S. P. R. TRIPATHI, Under Secy.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 16] 2018@T;s"B 26] 1940

4219

नई द8 ली, 7 जून, 2018

का

का.आ.

.आ.

.आ. 934

934

934.—dsUnz ljdkj ,rn~}kjk naM izfdz;k lafgrk] 1973 ¼1974 dk vf/kfu;e la- 2½ dh /kkjk 24 dh mi/kkjk

¼8½ }kjk iznRr 'kfä;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, xkft;kckn fLFkr fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa ¼1½ vkjlh bZvksMCY;w&II 02 bZ 1995]

,e,eVhlh ekeyk] ds-v- C;wjks cuke jeu esgrk ¼2½ vkjlh 3 bZ 1998 bZvksMCY;w&II ,e,eVhlh ekeyk ¼3½ vkjlh 3 bZ 2002

bZvksMCY;w&II] ,e,eVhlh ekeyk ¼4½ vkjlh 7 bZ 2003 bZvksMCY;w&II eSllZ vnkuh ,DliksVZ ¼5½ vkjlh 6 bZ 2003

bZvksMCY;w&II eSllZ txnEck IksVªksfy;e izk- fy- ¼6½ vkjlh 6 bZ 2003 bZvksMCY;w&II eSllZ nwxkZ vksojlht] ds-v-C;wjks] cuke

ijohu pqx ds fopkj.k rFkk buls mRiUu izklafxd vU; ekeyksa esa vihy@iqujh{k.k dk lapkyu djus ds fy, Jh vkj-ch-

'kekZ] vf/koDrk dks mudh fu;qfDr dh rkjh[k ls rhu o"kksaZ ds fy, vFkok vf/koDrk dks lkSais x, ekeyksa ds fuiVku gksus rd

vFkok vxys vkns’kksa rd] tks Hkh igys gks] fo’ks"k yksd vfHk;kstd ds :i esa fu;qDr djrh gSA

[फा. सं. 225/14/2017-एवीडी-II]

एस. पी. आर. ि7पाठी, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 7th June, 2018

S.O. 934.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (8) of Section 24 of the Code of Criminal

Procedure, 1973 ( 2 of 1974), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri R.B. Sharma, Advocate as the Special Public

Prosecutor for conducting cases (1) RC EOW – II 02E 1995, MMTC case, CBI Vs. Raman Mehta; (2) RC 3 E 1998

EOW-II MMTC case; (3) RC 3 E 2002 EOW-II, MMTC case; (4) RC 7 E 2003 EOW-II M/s. Adani Exports; (5) RC 6 E

2003 EOW-II M/s. Jagdamba Petrolium Pvt. Ltd.; and (6) RC 6 E 2003 EOW-II M/s. Durga Overseas, CBI, V/s Parveen

Chugh before the trial court at Ghaziabad and appeals, revisions or other matters connected therewith and incidental

thereto for a period of three years from the date of appointment or disposal of the cases entrusted to the Counsel or until

further orders whichever is earlier.

[F. No. 225/14/2017-AVD-II]

S. P. R. TRIPATHI, Under Secy.

वािणय एवं उोग मंालय

(वािणय िवभाग)

नई द8ली, 7 जून, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ. 935

935

935.—के;ीय सरकार, िनयाEत (गुणव%ा िनयं7ण एवं िनरी5ण) िनयम, 1964 के िनयम 12 के उपिनयम (2) व (3)

के साथ पMठत, िनयाEत (गुणव%ा िनयं7ण एवं िनरी5ण) अिधिनयम, 1963 (1963 का 22) क धारा 7 क उपधारा (1) $ारा द%

शि'य( का योग करते ,ए, मैससE िम7ा एस.के. ाइवेट िलिमटेड, हाउlसग बोडE कोलोनी, एचबी -४४, मधुबन, पारादीप, िजला

जगतlसघपुर, ओिडशा – 754142, को इस अिधसूचना के राजप7 म काशन क तारीख से तीन वषE क अविध के िलए खिनज और

अय9 क के िनरी5ण करने के िलए भारत सरकार के वािण3य मं7ालय क शासक य राजप7 भाग-II, खंm ड-3, उप-खंm ड (ii), म दनांक 20

दस_बर, 1965 क अिधसूचना सं. का.आ. 3975 तथा दनांक 20 दस_बर, 1965 क अिधसूचना सं. का.आ. 3978 के तहत कािशत

अिधसूचना म उपाब` अनुसूिचय( म िविनnदo खिनज और अय9क मश:

(क) मqगनीज अय9क, आयरन अय9क, फेरोमqगनीज 9लैग समेत फेरोमqगनीज

(ख) मqगनीज डाइऑ1साइड तथा ोम कंस;Vेट सिहत ोम अय9क

को िनयाEत से पूवE िनrिलिखत शतs के अधीन पारादीप प%न, धामरा प%न तथा गोपालपुर प%न, म एक अिभकरण के tप म मा;यता

देती है, अथाEत् :

(i)

यह अिभकरण, खिनज और अय9क समूह-I के िनयाEत (िनरी5ण) िनयम, 1965 तथा खिनज और अय9क समूह-II के

िनयाEत (िनरी5ण) िनयम, 1965 के िनयम 4 के अधीन िनरी5ण क प`ित क जाँच करने के िलये िनयाEत िनरी5ण

पMरषद् $ारा िनिम% नामिनnदo अिधकाMरय( को पयाEh सुिवधाएं देगा; और

(ii) यह अिभकरण, इस अिधसूचना के अधीन अपने कायs के पालन म िनदेशक (िनरी5ण और गुणव%ा िनयं7ण) िनयाEत

िनरी5ण पMरषद् $ारा समय-समय पर, िलिखत Iप म, दए गए ऐसे िनद^श( से आब` होगा।

[फा. सं. के-16014/3/2018-िनयाEत िनरी5ण]

संतोष कुमार सारंगी, संयु' सिचव (िनयाEत िनरी5ण िवभाग)

4220

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 16, 2018/JYAISTHA 26, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY

(Department of Commerce)

New Delhi, the 7th June, 2018

S.O. 935.—In exercise of the powers conferred by the sub-section (1) of section 7 of the Export (Quality Control

and Inspection) Act, 1963 (22 of 1963) read with sub-rule (2) and (3) of rule 12 of the Export (Quality Control and

Inspection) Rules, 1964, the Central Government hereby recognizes M/s Mitra S.K. Private Limited, Housing Board

Colony, HB-44, Madhuban, Paradip, District. Jagatsinghpur, Odisha-754142, as an agency for a period of three years

from the date of publication of this notification, for the inspection of-

(a) Manganese ore, Iron Ore , Ferromanganese including Ferromanganese Slag and

(b) Manganese Dioxide and Chrome Ore including Chrome Concentrate

specified in the Schedule annexed to the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Commerce, vide

number S.O. 3975 dated the 20^th December, 1965, and S.O.3978 dated the 20^thDecember, 1965 respectively, prior to

export of the said Minerals and Ores at Paradip Port, Dhamra Port, Gopalpur Port, subject to the following conditions,

namely: -

(i)

the said agency shall give adequate facilities to the officers nominated by the Export Inspection Council in

this behalf to carry out the inspection specified under rule 4 of the Export of Minerals and Ores - Group I

(Inspection) Rules, 1965 and Export of Minerals and Ores - Group II (Inspection) Rules, 1965;

(ii)

the said agency shall, in performance of its function as specified in this notification shall be bound by such

directions, as the Director (Inspection and Quality Control), Export Inspection Council, may give in

writing from time to time.

[F.No. K-16014/3/2018- Export Inspection]

SANTOSH KUMAR SARANGI, Jt. Secy. (Export Inspection Division)

िवुत

िवुत मंालय

मंालय

नई द8ली, 10 मई, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ. 936

936

936.—कीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासक य योजन( के िलए योग) िनयम, 1976 के िनयम 10 के उप िनयम

(4) के अनुसरण म िवZुत मं7ालय के शासिनक िनयं7णाधीन एनटीपीसी िलिमटेड के तालचेर थमEल पावर 9टेशन, तालचेर अंगुल-

759101 (ओिडशा) तथा फरxा सुपर थमEल पावर 9टेशन, नबाtण, मुyशदाबाद-742236 (पिzम बंगाल), िजनके 80 ितशत

कमEचारीवृंद ने lहदी का कायEसाधक {ान ाh कर िलया है, को एतKारा अिधसूिचत करती है।

[सं. 11011/9/2017-lहदी]

भारती, संयु' सिचव

MINISTRY OF POWER

New Delhi, the 10th May, 2018

S.O. 936.—In pursuance of Sub Rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for Official Purpose of

the Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government, hereby, notify the TALCHER THERMAL POWER STATION,

TALCHER, ANGUL-759101 (ORISSA) and FARAKKA SUPER THERMAL POWER STATION, NABARUN,

MURSHIDABAD-742236 (W.B.) of NTPC Limited under the administrative control of Ministry of Power, where 80%

of the staff have acquired working knowledge of Hindi.

[No.11011/9/2017-Hindi]

BHARATI, Jt. Secy.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 16] 2018@T;s"B 26] 1940

4221

कोयला मं7ालय

नई द8ली, 12 जून, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ. 937

937

937.—के;ीय सरकार, सरकारी 9थान (अ ािधकृत अिधभोिगय( क बेदखली) अिधिनयम,1971 (1971 का 40) क

धारा 3 $ारा द% शि'य( का योग करते ,ए, भारत के राजप7 के भाग II, खंड 3, उप-खंड (ii), तारीख 6 अग9त, 1994 म कािशत,

भारत सरकार के कोयला मं7ालय क अिधसूचना संLयांक का.आ. 1857, तारीख 24 जून, 1994, म िनrिलिखत संशोधन करती है,

अथाEत् :—

उ' अिधसूचना क सारणी म म संLयांक 57 और इससे संबंिधत िविoय( के पzात् , िनrिलिखत म संLयांक और

िविoयां अंत:9थािपत क जाएंगी, अथाEत्:—

सारणी

अिधकारी का नाम

सरकारी 9थान( का वगE

‘’ 58. उप-5े7 बंधक, पेनगंगा ओपनका9ट

पMरयोजना, वणी 5े7, डाकघर – िवIर, तहसील-

कोरपाना, िजला च;पुर, महारा} ।

पMरयोजना कायाEलय, 9टोसE, इलेि1Vकल और मैकेिनकल और ए1सकेवेशन

वकE शाप के सभी पMरसर, 33 केवी उप-9टेशन, िपट कायाEलय, कै;टीन और स_ब`

खनन 5े7 743.83 हे1टेयर भूिम पर आ[छादत, कोयला धारक 5े7 (अजEन और

िवकास) अिधिनयम, 1957 के अंतगEत अिध~हीत कया गया और पेनगंगा

ओपनका9ट पMरयोजना के िलए पूवEवतj भूिम अिध~हण अिधिनयम, 1894

(1894 का 1) के अंतगEत 4.23 हे1टेयर भूिम पर पेनगंगा नदी और उपमागE सड़क

का पुल अिध~हीत कया गया ।‘’

[फा.सं. 43022/5/2018-एलए एmड आईआर]

आर. एस. सरोज, अवर सिचव

टपण

टपण : मूल अिधसूचना, संLयांक का.आ. 1857, तारीख 24 जून, 1994, $ारा भारत के राजप7, भाग II, खंड 3, उप-खंड (ii),

तारीख 6 अग9त, 1994 म कािशत क गई थी ।

MINISTRY OF COAL

New Delhi, the 12th June, 2018

S.O. 937.—In exercise of the powers conferred by section 3 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized

Occupants), Act, 1971 (40 of 1971), the Central Government hereby makes the following amendment in the notification

of the Government of India in the Ministry of Coal, number S.O. 1857, dated the 24^th June, 1994, published in Part II,

Section 3, Sub-section (ii) of the Gazette of India, dated the 6^th August, 1994.

In the Table of the said notification, after serial number 57 and the entries relating thereto, the following shall

be inserted, namely:-

TABLE

Designation of the officer

Categories of Public Premises

“58. Sub- Area Manager, Penganga Opencast

Project, Wani Area, At and Post – Wirur,

Tehsil-Korpana,

District

Chandrapur,

Maharashtra.

All Premises of Project office, Stores, Electrical and Mechanical and

Excavation Work Shop, 33 Kv Sub-Station, Pit Office, Canteen and

allied Mining Area covered on 743.83 hectare Land acquired under

Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 and

River Bridge on Penganga River and approach road on 4.23 hectare

Land acquired under the erstwhile Land Acquisition Act, 1894( 1 of

1894) for Penganga Opencast Project”.

[F.No. 43022/5/2018-LA&IR ]

R. S. SAROJ, Under Secy.

4222

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 16, 2018/JYAISTHA 26, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Note : The principal notification was published in the Gazette of India, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii), vide number

S.O. 1857, dated the 24^th June,1994, published on dated the 6^th August,1994.

miHkksDrk ekeys] [kk| vkSj lkoZtfud forj.k ea=kky;

([kk| vkSj lkoZtfud forj.k foHkkx)

ubZ fnYyh] 7 twu] 2018

dk-vk- 938-—dsaæh; ljdkj] jktHkk"kk (la?k ds 'kkldh; iz;kstuksa ds fy, iz;ksx) fu;e] 1976 ds fu;e 10 ds mifu;e (4) ds

vuqlj.k esa] miHkksDrk ekeys] [kk| vkSj lkoZtfud forj.k ea=kky; ([kk| vkSj lkoZtfud forj.k foHkkx) ds iz'kklfud fu;a=k.kk/hu

fuEufyf[kr dk;kZy;] ftlds 80 izfr'kr ls vf/d deZpkjho`Un us ¯gnh dk dk;Zlk/d Kku izkIr dj fy;k gS] dks jkti=k esa vfèklwfpr djrh

gS %—

1- dsUæh; HkaMkj.k fuxe]

lsaVªy os;jgkÅl] ukfld jksM]

nsoykyh foyst] jsyos LVs'ku ds ikl]

ukfld&422101

¹la- bZ&11011@1@2008&¯gnhº

dey nÙkk] la;qDr lfpo

MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

(Department of Food and Public Distribution)

New Delhi, the 7th June, 2018

S.O. 938.—In pursuance of Sub-rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (Use for Official Purpose of the

Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government hereby notifies the following office under the administrative control of the

Ministry of Conumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution (Department of Food and Public Distribution), whereof more

than 80% of staff have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi :

Central Warehousing Corporation,

Central Warehouse, Nasik Road,

Devlali Village, Near Railway Station,

Nasik-422101

[No. E-11011/1/2008- Hindi]

KAMAL DATTA, Jt. Secy.

पेोिलयम और ाकृितक गैस मंालय

नई द8 ली, 4 जून, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ. 939

939

939.—तेल उZोग (िवकास) अिधिनयम 1974 (1974 का 47) क धारा (3) क उपधारा (3)(क) $ारा द% शि1 तय(

का योग करते ,ए, के; सरकार एतKारा .ी अमर नाथ, संयु1 त सिचव (अ; वेषण), पेVोिलयम और ाकृितक गैस मं7ालय को दनांक

01.06.2018 से 31.05.2020 तक अथवा अगले आदेश होने तक, जो भी पहले हो, तेल उZोग िवकास बोडE के सद9 य के Iप म िनयु1 त

करती है।

[फा.सं. जी-38011/41/2016-िव%-I]

पेMरन देवी, िनदेशक

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 16] 2018@T;s"B 26] 1940

4223

MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS

New Delhi, the 4th June, 2018

S.O. 939.—In exercise of the Powers conferred by Sub-Section (3)(a) of Section 3 of the Oil Industry

(Development) Act, 1974 (47 of 1974), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Amar Nath, Joint

Secretary(Exploration), Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas as a member of the Oil Industry Development Board w.e.f.

01-06-2018 to 31-05-2020 or until further orders, whichever is earlier.

[F.No. G-38011/41/2016-Fin.I]

PERIN DEVI, Director

नई द8ली, 8 जून, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ. 940

940

940.—के; ीय सरकार ने पे€ोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूिम म उपयोग के अिधकार का अजEन) अिधिनयम

1962, (1962 का 50) क धारा 2 के खm ड (अ) के अनुसरण म 26 नव_बर, 2011 को भारत के राजप7 म कािशत, भारत सरकार के

पे€ोिलयम और ाकृितक गैस मं7ालय क अिधसूचना संL या का. आ. 3384 तारीख 16 नव_बर, 2011 म िन_ निलिखत Iप म संशोधन

संशोधन

करती है

करती है :-

“.ी अिनल कुमार, उप ब;धक (तकनीक सेवाए) ” श!द#

श!द#

श!द# के

के

के $थान

$थान

$थान पर

पर

पर, ‘’.ी मह कुमार सा , वMर‚ अनुर5ण ब;धक,

” श!द

श!द

श!द रखे

रखे

रखे जाएंगे

जाएंगे

जाएंगे।

यह अिधसूचना जारी होने क. तारीख से लागू होगी

यह अिधसूचना जारी होने क. तारीख से लागू होगी ।

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/239/2017-ओआर-I/ई-13892]

पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 8th June, 2018

S.O. 940.—In pursuance of clause (a) of Section 2 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of

Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby makes the following amendment in the

notification of Government of India in Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas S.O. 3384 dated 16^th November 2011,

published in the Gazette of India on 26^th November, 2011 namely:

In the said notification, for the words “Shri Anil Kumar, Dy. Manager (Technical Services)” the words

“Shri Mahendra Kumar Sahoo, Senior Maintenance Manager” shall be substituted.

The notification is applicable from the date of issue.

[F. No. R-11025(11)/239/2017-OR-I/E-13892]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

नई द8ली, 8 जून, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ. 941

941

941.—dsUnzh; ljdkj us isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbZiykbZu ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½ vf/kfu;e

1962 ¼1962 dk 50½ ¼ftls blesa blds Ik'pkr mä vf/kfu;e dgk x;k gSa½ dh /kkjk 3 dh mi/kkjk ¼1½ ds v/khu tkjh dh xbZ

Hkkjr ljdkj ds isVªksfy;e vkSj izkd`frd xSl ea=ky; dh vf/klwpuk la[;k dk-vk- 2754 rkjh[k 7 fnlEcj 2017] tks Hkkjr

ds jkti= rkjh[k 9 fnlEcj 2017] esa izdkf'kr dh xbZ Fkh }kjk ml vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa fofufnZ"V Hkwfe esa fcgkj

jkT; esa ^^iVuk & eksfrgkjh & cSrkyiqj 'kk[kk ikbiykbu** ds vUrxZr ftyk xksikyxat esa isVªksfy;e ifjogu ds fy,

bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbZiykbZu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj ds vtZu ds vius vk'k;

dh ?kks"k.kk dh Fkh (

vkSj mä jkti= vf/klwpuk dh izfr;ka turk dks rkjh[k 11 ekpZ 2018 rd miyC/k djk nh xbZ Fkh (

vkSj l{ke izkf/kdkjh us mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi/kkjk ¼1½ ds v/khu dsUnzh; ljdkj dks fjiksVZ ns nh gS (

vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj us] mä fjiksVZ ij fopkj djus ds Ik'pkr~ vkSj ;g lek/kku gks tkus ij fd mä Hkwfe ikbZiykbZu

fcNkus ds fy, visf{kr gS] mlesa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu djus dk fofu'p; fd;k gS (

4224

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 16, 2018/JYAISTHA 26, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

vr% vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk izn~Ùk 'kfä;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, ;g

?kks"k.kk djrh gS fd bl vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa fofufnZ"V Hkwfe esa ikbZiykbZu fcNkus ds fy, mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk

vtZu fd;k tk, (

vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi/kkjk ¼4½ }kjk izn~Ùk 'kfä;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] ;g funsZ'k

nsrh gS fd mä Hkwfe esa mi;ksx dk vf/kdkj bl ?kks"k.kk ds izdk'ku dh rkjh[k ls dsUnzh; ljdkj esa fufgr gksus ds ctk,]

lHkh foYyaxeksa ls eqä gksdj bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM esa fufgr gksxhA

isVªksfy;e vksj [kfut ikbZiykbZu vf/kfu;e] 1962 dh /kkjk 10 ds v/khu fdlh Hkh {kfriwfrZ ds fy, bafM;u vkW;y

dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM iw.kZr;k mÙkjnk;h gksxh vkSj ikbZiykbZu ls lEcfU/kr fdlh Hkh ekeys ij dsUnzh; ljdkj ds fo#) dksbZ

okn nkok ;k dkuwuh dk;Zokgh ugha gks ldsxhA

अनुसूची

ftyk % xksikyxat

jkT; % fcgkj

ekStk @xzke

losZ @ Cykd @ la-

¼IyksV la-½

lc&Mho&la-

{ks=Qy

gsDV;j

vkjs

OkxZehVj

Vsdsuokl

515

Fkkuk uacj&362

491

516

514

513

egEeniqj

2623

Fkkuk uacj&310

2621

2622

2735

2734

2729

2730

2728

2726

2727

Ikhijk

320

Fkkuk uacj &388

321

312

176

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/196/2017-ओआर-I/ई-9925]

पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 8th June, 2018

S.O. 941.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural

Gas S.O. No. 2754 dated the 7^th December, 2017, issued under sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals

Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (here in after referred to as the said Act),

published in the Gazette of India dated the 9^th December, 2017, the Central Government declared its intention to acquire

the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying “Patna -

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 16] 2018@T;s"B 26] 1940

4225

Motihari - Baitalpur Branch Pipeline” for the transportation of Petroleum Products in Gopalgunj District the state of

Bihar by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public up to 11^th March, 2018;

And whereas the competent authority has under sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act submitted report to

the Central Government;

And whereas the Central Government, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is

required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of user therein;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is

hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the

Central Government, vest on the date of publication of the declaration, in Indian Oil Corporation Limited, free from all

encumbrances.

Indian Oil Corporation Limited shall be exclusively liable for any compensation in terms of Section 10 of the

P & MP Act, 1962 and no suit, claim or legal proceeding would lie against the Central Government on any matter

relating to the pipeline.

SCHEDULE

District : Gopalgunj

State : Bihar

Mouja / Village

Survey/Block No.

Sub-Div-No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

Teknewas

515

Thana no.-362

491

516

514

513

Mahammadpur

2623

Thana no.-310

2621

2622

2735

2734

2729

2730

2728

2726

2727

Pipra

320

Thana no.-388

321

312

176

[F. No. R-11025(11)/196/2017-OR-I/E-9925]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

4226

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 16, 2018/JYAISTHA 26, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

नई द8ली, 8 जून, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ. 942

942

942.—dsUnzh; ljdkj us isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbZiykbZu ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½ vf/kfu;e

1962 ¼1962 dk 50½ ¼ftls blesa blds Ik'pkr mä vf/kfu;e dgk x;k gSa½ dh /kkjk 3 dh mi/kkjk ¼1½ ds v/khu tkjh dh xbZ

Hkkjr ljdkj ds isVªksfy;e vkSj izkd`frd xSl ea=ky; dh vf/klwpuk la[;k dk-vk- 2685 rkjh[k 21 uoEcj 2017] tks Hkkjr

ds jkti= rkjh[k 2 fnlEcj 2017] esa izdkf'kr dh xbZ Fkh }kjk ml vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa fofufnZ"V Hkwfe esa fcgkj

jkT; esa ^^iVuk & eksfrgkjh & cSrkyiqj 'kk[kk ikbiykbu** ds vUrxZr ftyk iwohZ pEikj.k esa isVªksfy;e ifjogu ds fy,

bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbZiykbZu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj ds vtZu ds vius vk'k;

dh ?kks"k.kk dh Fkh (

vkSj mä jkti= vf/klwpuk dh izfr;ka turk dks rkjh[k 11 ekpZ 2018 rd miyC/k djk nh xbZ Fkh (

vkSj l{ke izkf/kdkjh us mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi/kkjk ¼1½ ds v/khu dsUnzh; ljdkj dks fjiksVZ ns nh gS (

vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj us] mä fjiksVZ ij fopkj djus ds Ik'pkr~ vkSj ;g lek/kku gks tkus ij fd mä Hkwfe ikbZiykbZu

fcNkus ds fy, visf{kr gS] mlesa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu djus dk fofu'p; fd;k gS (

vr% vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk izn~Ùk 'kfä;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, ;g

?kks"k.kk djrh gS fd bl vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa fofufnZ"V Hkwfe esa ikbZiykbZu fcNkus ds fy, mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk

vtZu fd;k tk, (

vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi/kkjk ¼4½ }kjk izn~Ùk 'kfä;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] ;g funsZ'k

nsrh gS fd mä Hkwfe esa mi;ksx dk vf/kdkj bl ?kks"k.kk ds izdk'ku dh rkjh[k ls dsUnzh; ljdkj esa fufgr gksus ds ctk,]

lHkh foYyaxeksa ls eqä gksdj bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM esa fufgr gksxhA

isVªksfy;e vksj [kfut ikbZiykbZu vf/kfu;e] 1962 dh /kkjk 10 ds v/khu fdlh Hkh {kfriwfrZ ds fy, bafM;u vkW;y

dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM iw.kZr;k mÙkjnk;h gksxh vkSj ikbZiykbZu ls lEcfU/kr fdlh Hkh ekeys ij dsUnzh; ljdkj ds fo#) dksbZ

okn nkok ;k dkuwuh dk;Zokgh ugha gks ldsxhA

अनुसूची

ftyk % iqohZ pEikj.k

jkT; % fcgkj

ekStk @xzke

losZ @ Cyksd @ la-

¼IyksV la-½

Lkc&Mho& la-

{ks=Qy

gsDVs;j

vkjs

oxZ ehVj

fcljkeiqj nqckSfy;k

473

Fkkuk ua0&206

lsEHkqvkiqj

1244

Fkkuk ua0&36

1241

1240

1239

uokMk

1885

Fkkuk ua0&180

felhj Vksyk

365

Fkkuk ua0&163

yksfg;kj mTT©u

1762

Fkkuk uacj&133

1729

1730

2752

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 16] 2018@T;s"B 26] 1940

4227

2761

2597

t;flagiqj

4538

Fkkuk uacj&85

4541

4540

4539

4536

4464

4023

2461@6829

2387

2461

2462

2463

2367

2360

2361

2359

2358

489

490

768

csyok jk; Vksyk cSjkxh

285

Fkkuk uacj&72

Nijk Hkkl

6437

Fkkuk uacj&56

6405

7386

6500

5979

5978

5980

5981

5998

6000

5999

6001

6005

8183

4228

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 16, 2018/JYAISTHA 26, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

6002

6003

6024

6019

6021

6020

5819

5818

5820

5821

5824

5788

5825

5826

5831

5832

5833

5830

5835

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/196/2017-ओआर-I/ई-9925]

पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 8th June, 2018

S.O. 942.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural

Gas S.O. No. 2685 dated the 21^st November, 2017, issued under sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and

Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (here in after referred to as the said

Act), published in the Gazette of India dated the 2^nd December, 2017, the Central Government declared its intention to

acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying

“Patna - Motihari - Baitalpur Branch Pipeline” for the transportation of Petroleum Products in East Champaran District

the state of Bihar by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public up to 11^th March, 2018;

And whereas the competent authority has under sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act submitted report to the

Central Government;

And whereas the Central Government, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is

required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of user therein;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is

hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the

Central Government, vest on the date of publication of the declaration, in Indian Oil Corporation Limited, free from all

encumbrances.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 16] 2018@T;s"B 26] 1940

4229

Indian Oil Corporation Limited shall be exclusively liable for any compensation in terms of Section 10 of the

P & MP Act, 1962 and no suit, claim or legal proceeding would lie against the Central Government on any matter

relating to the pipeline.

SCHEDULE

District : East Champaran

State : Bihar

Mouja / Village

Survey/Block/No.

Sub-Div-No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

Bishrampur Dubauliya

473

Thana No.-206

Shembhuapur

1244

Thana No.-36

1241

1240

1239

Nawada

1885

Thana No.-180

Misir Tola

365

Thana No.-163

Lohiyar Ujjain

1762

Thana No.-133

1729

1730

2752

2761

2597

Jaisinghapur

4538

Thana No.-85

4541

4540

4539

4536

4464

4023

2461/6829

2387

2461

2462

2463

2367

2360

2361

2359

2358

4230

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 16, 2018/JYAISTHA 26, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

489

490

768

Belwa Ray Tola Bairagi

285

Thana No.-72

Chhapra Bahas

6437

Thana No.-56

6405

7386

6500

5979

5978

5980

5981

5998

6000

5999

6001

6005

8183

6002

6003

6024

6019

6021

6020

5819

5818

5820

5821

5824

5788

5825

5826

5831

5832

5833

5830

5835

[F. No. R-11025(11)/196/2017-OR-I/E-9925]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 16] 2018@T;s"B 26] 1940

4231

नई द8ली, 8 जून, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ. 943

943

943.—dsUnzh; ljdkj us isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbZiykbZu ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½ vf/kfu;e

1962 ¼1962 dk 50½ ¼ftls blesa blds Ik'pkr mä vf/kfu;e dgk x;k gSa½ dh /kkjk 3 dh mi/kkjk ¼1½ ds v/khu tkjh dh xbZ

Hkkjr ljdkj ds isVªksfy;e vkSj izkd`frd xSl ea=ky; dh vf/klwpuk la[;k dk-vk- 2755 rkjh[k 7 fnlEcj 2017] tks Hkkjr

ds jkti= rkjh[k 9 fnlEcj 2017] esa izdkf'kr dh xbZ Fkh }kjk ml vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa fofufnZ"V Hkwfe esa fcgkj

jkT; esa ^^iVuk & eksfrgkjh & cSrkyiqj 'kk[kk ikbiykbu** ds vUrxZr ftyk lkju esa isVªksfy;e ifjogu ds fy, bafM;u

vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbZiykbZu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj ds vtZu ds vius vk'k; dh

?kks"k.kk dh Fkh (

vkSj mä jkti= vf/klwpuk dh izfr;ka turk dks rkjh[k 11 ekpZ 2018 rd miyC/k djk nh xbZ Fkh (

vkSj l{ke izkf/kdkjh us mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi/kkjk ¼1½ ds v/khu dsUnzh; ljdkj dks fjiksVZ ns nh gS (

vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj us] mä fjiksVZ ij fopkj djus ds Ik'pkr~ vkSj ;g lek/kku gks tkus ij fd mä Hkwfe ikbZiykbZu

fcNkus ds fy, visf{kr gS] mlesa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu djus dk fofu'p; fd;k gS (

vr% vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk izn~Ùk 'kfä;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, ;g

?kks"k.kk djrh gS fd bl vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa fofufnZ"V Hkwfe esa ikbZiykbZu fcNkus ds fy, mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk

vtZu fd;k tk, (

vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi/kkjk ¼4½ }kjk izn~Ùk 'kfä;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] ;g funsZ'k

nsrh gS fd mä Hkwfe esa mi;ksx dk vf/kdkj bl ?kks"k.kk ds izdk'ku dh rkjh[k ls dsUnzh; ljdkj esa fufgr gksus ds ctk,]

lHkh foYyaxeksa ls eqä gksdj bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM esa fufgr gksxhA

isVªksfy;e vksj [kfut ikbZiykbZu vf/kfu;e] 1962 dh /kkjk 10 ds v/khu fdlh Hkh {kfriwfrZ ds fy, bafM;u vkW;y

dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM iw.kZr;k mÙkjnk;h gksxh vkSj ikbZiykbZu ls lEcfU/kr fdlh Hkh ekeys ij dsUnzh; ljdkj ds fo#) dksbZ

okn nkok ;k dkuwuh dk;Zokgh ugha gks ldsxhA

अनुसूची

ftyk % lkju

jkT; % fcgkj

ekStk @xzke

losZ @ Cykd @ la-

¼IyksV la-½

lc&Mho&la-

{ks=Qy

gsDVs;j

vkjs

oxZ ehVj

dkthiwj

531

Fkkuk uacj % 514

532

535

536

533

514

516

421

417

416

egkjkt xat

Fkkuk uacj % 308

jktey fijkjh

427

4232

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 16, 2018/JYAISTHA 26, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Fkkuk uacj % 261

425

Vsdfuokl

3179

Fkkuk uacj % 263

3143

Lkegqrk

4034

Fkkuk uacj % 234

4033

4031

3859

3851

3852

3853

3823

3822

3824

3749

3748

3750

3745

3744

3743

dksik

583

Fkkuk uacj % 231

580

579

ihvkuks

2099

Fkkuk uacj % 200

2073

2074

2076

2075

2077

2078

1981

1944

1945

csyljk

814

Fkkuk uacj % 152

,uk;riqj

2031

Fkkuk uacj % 156

/kkuk Mhg

238

Fkkuk uacj % 95

236

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 16] 2018@T;s"B 26] 1940

4233

228

vrkjlu

4802

Fkkuk uacj % 6

jlqyiwj

1011

Fkkuk uacj % 99

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/196/2017-ओआर-I/ई-9925]

पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 8th June, 2018

S.O. 943.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural

Gas S.O. No. 2755 dated the 7^th December, 2017, issued under sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and

Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (here in after referred to as the said

Act), published in the Gazette of India dated the 9^th December, 2017, the Central Government declared its intention to

acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying

“Patna - Motihari - Baitalpur Branch Pipeline” for the transportation of Petroleum Products in Saran District the state of

Bihar by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public up to 11^th March, 2018;

And whereas the competent authority has under sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act submitted report to

the Central Government;

And whereas the Central Government, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is

required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of user therein;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is

hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the

Central Government, vest on the date of publication of the declaration, in Indian Oil Corporation Limited, free from all

encumbrances.

Indian Oil Corporation Limited shall be exclusively liable for any compensation in terms of Section 10 of the

P & MP Act, 1962 and no suit, claim or legal proceeding would lie against the Central Government on any matter

relating to the pipeline.

SCHEDULE

District : Saran State : Bihar

Mouja / Village

Survey/Block

No.

Sub-Div-No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

Qazipur

531

Thana no.- 514

532

535

536

533

514

516

4234

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 16, 2018/JYAISTHA 26, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

421

417

416

Mahrajgunj

Thana no.- 308

Rajmalpirari

427

Thana no.- 261

425

Teknwas

3179

Thana no.- 263

3143

Samhuta

4034

Thana no.- 234

4033

4031

3859

3851

3852

3853

3823

3822

3824

3749

3748

3750

3745

3744

3743

Kopa

583

Thana no.- 231

580

579

Piano

2099

Thana no.- 200

2073

2074

2076

2075

2077

2078

1981

1944

1945

Belsara

814

Thana no.- 152

Enaetpur

2031

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 16] 2018@T;s"B 26] 1940

4235

Thana no.- 156

Dhana Dih

238

Thana no.- 95

236

228

Atarsan

4802

Thana no.- 6

Rasulpur

1011

Thana no.- 99

[F. No. R-11025(11)/196/2017-OR-I/E-9925]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

नई द8 ली, 8 जून, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ. 944

944

944.—dsUnzh; ljdkj us isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbZiykbZu ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½ vf/kfu;e

1962 ¼1962 dk 50½ ¼ftls blesa blds Ik'pkr mä vf/kfu;e dgk x;k gSa½ dh /kkjk 3 dh mi/kkjk ¼1½ ds v/khu tkjh dh xbZ

Hkkjr ljdkj ds isVªksfy;e vkSj izkd`frd xSl ea=ky; dh vf/klwpuk la[;k dk-vk- 2688 rkjh[k 24 uoEcj 2017] tks Hkkjr

ds jkti= rkjh[k 2 fnlEcj 2017] esa izdkf'kr dh xbZ Fkh }kjk ml vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa fofufnZ"V Hkwfe esa fcgkj

jkT; esa ^^iVuk & eksfrgkjh & cSrkyiqj 'kk[kk ikbiykbu** ds vUrxZr ftyk iVuk esa isVªksfy;e ifjogu ds fy, bafM;u

vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbZiykbZu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj ds vtZu ds vius vk'k; dh

?kks"k.kk dh Fkh (

vkSj mä jkti= vf/klwpuk dh izfr;ka turk dks rkjh[k 12 ekpZ 2018 rd miyC/k djk nh xbZ Fkh (

vkSj l{ke izkf/kdkjh us mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi/kkjk ¼1½ ds v/khu dsUnzh; ljdkj dks fjiksVZ ns nh gS (

vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj us] mä fjiksVZ ij fopkj djus ds Ik'pkr~ vkSj ;g lek/kku gks tkus ij fd mä Hkwfe ikbZiykbZu

fcNkus ds fy, visf{kr gS] mlesa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu djus dk fofu'p; fd;k gS (

vr% vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk izn~Ùk 'kfä;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, ;g

?kks"k.kk djrh gS fd bl vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa fofufnZ"V Hkwfe esa ikbZiykbZu fcNkus ds fy, mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk

vtZu fd;k tk, (

vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi/kkjk ¼4½ }kjk izn~Ùk 'kfä;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] ;g funsZ'k

nsrh gS fd mä Hkwfe esa mi;ksx dk vf/kdkj bl ?kks"k.kk ds izdk'ku dh rkjh[k ls dsUnzh; ljdkj esa fufgr gksus ds ctk,]

lHkh foYyaxeksa ls eqä gksdj bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM esa fufgr gksxhA

isVªksfy;e vksj [kfut ikbZiykbZu vf/kfu;e] 1962 dh /kkjk 10 ds v/khu fdlh Hkh {kfriwfrZ ds fy, bafM;u vkW;y

dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM iw.kZr;k mÙkjnk;h gksxh vkSj ikbZiykbZu ls lEcfU/kr fdlh Hkh ekeys ij dsUnzh; ljdkj ds fo#) dksbZ

okn nkok ;k dkuwuh dk;Zokgh ugha gks ldsxhA

अनुसूची

ftyk % iVuk

jkT; % fcgkj

ekStk @xzke

losZ @ Cykd @ la-

¼IyksV la-½

lc&Mho&la-

{ks=Qy

gsDVs;j

vkjs

oxZ ehVj

vYgkuiqjk

2204

Fkkuk uacj&60

chlquiqjk

680

Fkkuk uacj&66

682

404

4236

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 16, 2018/JYAISTHA 26, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

403

402

377

379

ij[kksrheiqj iSukBh

950

Fkkuk uacj&68

927

929

928

930

923

922

921

616

617

618

622

dqryqiqj

1225

Fkkuk uacj&56

511@2716

eqUlsiqj

521

Fkkuk uacj&19

ek/kksiqj

875

Fkkuk uacj&21

876

877

878

884

881

882

880

636

637

638

639

640

jkeckn

1422

Fkkuk uaŒ&7@110

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/196/2017-ओआर-I/ई-9925]

पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 16] 2018@T;s"B 26] 1940

4237

New Delhi, the 8th June, 2018

S.O. 944.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural

Gas S.O. No. 2688 dated the 24^th November, 2017, issued under sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and

Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (here in after referred to as the said

Act), published in the Gazette of India dated the 2^nd December, 2017, the Central Government declared its intention to

acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying

“Patna - Motihari - Baitalpur Branch Pipeline” for the transportation of Petroleum Products in Patna District the state of

Bihar by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public up to 12^th March, 2018;

And whereas the competent authority has under sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act submitted report to the

Central Government;

And whereas the Central Government, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is

required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of user therein;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is

hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the

Central Government, vest on the date of publication of the declaration, in Indian Oil Corporation Limited, free from all

encumbrances.

Indian Oil Corporation Limited shall be exclusively liable for any compensation in terms of Section 10 of the P

& MP Act, 1962 and no suit, claim or legal proceeding would lie against the Central Government on any matter relating

to the pipeline.

SCHEDULE

District : Patna

State : Bihar

Mouja / Village

Survey/Block No.

Sub-Div-No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

Alhanpur

2204

Thana no.60

Bisunpura

680

Thana no.-66

682

404

403

402

377

379

Parkhotimpur

950

Painathi

927

Thana no.-68

929

928

930

923

922

921

4238

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 16, 2018/JYAISTHA 26, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

616

617

618

622

Kutlupur

1225

Thana no.-56

511/2716

Munsepur

521

Thana no.-19

Madhopur

875

Thana no.-21

876

877

878

884

881

882

880

636

637

638

639

640

Rambad

1422

Thana no.-7/110

[F. No. R-11025(11)/196/2017-OR-I/E-9925]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

नई द8ली, 8 जून, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ. 945

945

945.—dsUnzh; ljdkj us isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbZiykbZu ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½ vf/kfu;e

1962 ¼1962 dk 50½ ¼ftls blesa blds Ik'pkr mä vf/kfu;e dgk x;k gSa½ dh /kkjk 3 dh mi/kkjk ¼1½ ds v/khu tkjh dh xbZ

Hkkjr ljdkj ds isVªksfy;e vkSj izkd`frd xSl ea=ky; dh vf/klwpuk la[;k dk-vk- 2633 rkjh[k 13 uoEcj 2017] tks Hkkjr

ds jkti= rkjh[k 18 uoEcj 2017] esa izdkf'kr dh xbZ Fkh }kjk ml vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa fofufnZ"V Hkwfe esa fcgkj

jkT; esa ^^iVuk & eksfrgkjh & cSrkyiqj 'kk[kk ikbiykbu** ds vUrxZr ftyk floku esa isVªksfy;e ifjogu ds fy, bafM;u

vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbZiykbZu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj ds vtZu ds vius vk'k; dh

?kks"k.kk dh Fkh (

vkSj mä jkti= vf/klwpuk dh izfr;ka turk dks rkjh[k 11 ekpZ 2018 rd miyC/k djk nh xbZ Fkh (

vkSj l{ke izkf/kdkjh us mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi/kkjk ¼1½ ds v/khu dsUnzh; ljdkj dks fjiksVZ ns nh gS (

vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj us] mä fjiksVZ ij fopkj djus ds Ik'pkr~ vkSj ;g lek/kku gks tkus ij fd mä Hkwfe ikbZiykbZu

fcNkus ds fy, visf{kr gS] mlesa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu djus dk fofu'p; fd;k gS (

vr% vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk izn~Ùk 'kfä;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, ;g

?kks"k.kk djrh gS fd bl vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa fofufnZ"V Hkwfe esa ikbZiykbZu fcNkus ds fy, mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk

vtZu fd;k tk, (

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 16] 2018@T;s"B 26] 1940

4239

vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi/kkjk ¼4½ }kjk izn~Ùk 'kfä;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] ;g funsZ'k

nsrh gS fd mä Hkwfe esa mi;ksx dk vf/kdkj bl ?kks"k.kk ds izdk'ku dh rkjh[k ls dsUnzh; ljdkj esa fufgr gksus ds ctk,]

lHkh foYyaxeksa ls eqä gksdj bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM esa fufgr gksxhA

isVªksfy;e vksj [kfut ikbZiykbZu vf/kfu;e] 1962 dh /kkjk 10 ds v/khu fdlh Hkh {kfriwfrZ ds fy, bafM;u vkW;y

dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM iw.kZr;k mÙkjnk;h gksxh vkSj ikbZiykbZu ls lEcfU/kr fdlh Hkh ekeys ij dsUnzh; ljdkj ds fo#) dksbZ

okn nkok ;k dkuwuh dk;Zokgh ugha gks ldsxhA

अनुसूची

ftyk % floku

jkT; % fcgkj

ekStk @xzke

losZ @ Cykd @

la- ¼IyksV la-½

Lkc-fMfo--la-

{ks=Qy

gsDVs;j

vkjs

oxZ ehVj

enkjhpd

919

Fkkuk uacj&235

920

918

906

748

808

795

796

794

cxkSjk

643

Fkkuk uacj&234

105

104

103

113

145

143

ngdkbZ

267

Fkkuk uacj&231

241

nkSu Nkijk

196

Fkkuk uacj&230

193

eaNk

855

Fkkuk uacj&225

Hknsvk

Fkkuk uacj&226

115

mLrh

191

Fkkuk uacj&224

ehjkpd

359

Fkkuk uacj&199

358

4240

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 16, 2018/JYAISTHA 26, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

348

209

207

219

ckyMhg

Fkkuk uacj&183

#dqUnhiwj

1201

Fkkuk uacj&168

txnh'kiqj

656

Fkkuk uacj&160

Ckakxjk

2154

Fkkuk uacj&156

3040

Hkh[kk cu

Fkkuk uacj&153

nsmjh;k

367

Fkkuk uacj&153

1281

1329

fclquiqjk eg©jh

2820

Fkkuk uacj&154

2896

2889

2883

2881

2879

1951

1956

1949

1751

1752

1750

1749

lqjchj

213

Fkkuk uacj&152

214

855

856

858

857

970

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 16] 2018@T;s"B 26] 1940

4241

996

998

1158

1328

1332

1348

1524

1366

1414

1408

1400

1397

1428

ÃVgjh

772

Fkkuk uacj&145

651

647

634

620

616

614

395

396

397

398

399

400

511

511@877

510

408

407

410

366

341

ggok

1143

Fkkuk uacj&130

1136

1134@1483

Tkxnh'kiqj

288

Fkkuk uacj&129

509

4242

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 16, 2018/JYAISTHA 26, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

555

556

559

857

vxs;ku

4543

Fkkuk uacj&113

4542

4540

4598

4602

3665

3703

3495

3454

3439

3440

2587

2533

1743

1771@5002

1773

5+6

1758

1757

1812

1645

1644

1656

1473

1474

1358

lFkokj

1387

Fkkuk uacj&89

1431

1190

1194

1216

[kokliqj

399

Fkkuk uacj&74

100

lhdrh;k

2025

Fkkuk uacj&63

2024

tykYkiqj

185

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 16] 2018@T;s"B 26] 1940

4243

Fkkuk uacj&62

Mqejk

2884

Fkkuk uacj&58

2892

2893

2968

2977

3001

2991

2995

2998

3082

3086

4594

3322

3321

3325

3326

3318

3518

3526

3529

3602

5392

5481

eanjk ikyh

1157@1897

Fkkuk uacj&394

1036

1045

357

355

eUnjkSyh

1922

Fkkuk uacj&393

1883

1933

ygsth

2568

Fkkuk uacj&392

2567

2541

2531

2529

4244

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 16, 2018/JYAISTHA 26, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2448

2447

Qkthyiqj

1509

Fkkuk uacj&364

epduk

2144

Fkkuk uacj&214

2128

1142

ÒSlk[ky

1046

Fkkuk uacj& 154

739

eqbu

2863

Fkkuk uacj& 137

1509

2011

1762

1758

1770

1772

1773

iks[kjsjk

1029

Fkkuk uacj&76

1024

1022

dqynhik

411

Fkkuk uacj&77

lsorkiwj

2088

Fkkuk uacj&76

539

537

547

548

549

580

578

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/196/2017-ओआर-I/ई-9925]

पवन कुमार, अवर सिचव

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 16] 2018@T;s"B 26] 1940

4245

New Delhi, the 8th June, 2018

S.O. 945.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural

Gas S.O. No. 2633 dated the 13^th November, 2017, issued under sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and

Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (here in after referred to as the said

Act), published in the Gazette of India dated the 18^th November, 2017, the Central Government declared its intention to

acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying

“Patna - Motihari - Baitalpur Branch Pipeline” for the transportation of Petroleum Products in Siwan District the state of

Bihar by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public up to 12^th March, 2018;

And whereas the competent authority has under sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act submitted report to

the Central Government;

And whereas the Central Government, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land

is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of user therein;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is

hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the

Central Government, vest on the date of publication of the declaration, in Indian Oil Corporation Limited, free from all

encumbrances.

Indian Oil Corporation Limited shall be exclusively liable for any compensation in terms of Section 10 of the P

& MP Act, 1962 and no suit, claim or legal proceeding would lie against the Central Government on any matter relating

to the pipeline.

SCHEDULE

District : Siwan

State : Bihar

Mouja / Village

Survey/Block

No.

Sub-Div-No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

Madarichak

919

Thana No.-235

920

918

906

748

808

795

796

794

Bagaura

643

Thana No.-234

105

104

103

113

145

143

Dahkai

267

Thana No.-231

241

4246

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 16, 2018/JYAISTHA 26, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Dawn Chapra

196

Thana No.-230

193

Mancha

855

Thana No.-225

Bhadea

Thana No.-226

115

Usti

191

Thana No.-224

Mirachak

359

Thana No.-199

358

348

209

207

219

Baldih

Thana No.-183

Rukundipur

1201

Thana No.-168

Jagdishpur

656

Thana No.-160

Bangra

2154

Thana No.-156

3040

Bhikhaban

Thana No.-153

Devaria

367

Thana No.-153

1281

1329

Bishunpur Mahuari

2820

Thana No.-154

2896

2889

2883

2881

2879

1951

1956

1949

1751

1752

1750

1749

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 16] 2018@T;s"B 26] 1940

4247

Surbir

213

Thana No.-152

214

855

856

858

857

970

996

998

1158

1328

1332

1348

1524

1366

1414

1408

1400

1397

1428

Ithari

772

Thana No.-145

651

647

634

620

616

614

395

396

397

398

399

400

511

511/877

510

408

407

410

366

341

4248

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 16, 2018/JYAISTHA 26, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Hahwa

1143

Thana No.-130

1136

1134/1483

Jagdishpur

288

Thana No.-129

509

555

556

559

857

Ageyan

4543

Thana No.-113

4542

4540

4598

4602

3665

3703

3495

3454

3439

3440

2587

2533

1743

1771/5002

1773

1758

1757

1812

1645

1644

1656

1473

1474

1358

Sathwar

1387

Thana No.-89

1431

1190

1194

1216

Khawaspur

399

Thana No.-74

100

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 16] 2018@T;s"B 26] 1940

4249

Sikatiya

2025

Thana No.-63

2024

Jalalpur

185

Thana No.-62

Dumra

2884

Thana No.-58

2892

2893

2968

2977

3001

2991

2995

2998

3082

3086

4594

3322

3321

3325

3326

3318

3518

3526

3529

3602

5392

5481

Mandrapali

1157/1897

Thana No.-394

1036

1045

357

355

Mandrauli

1922

Thana No.-393

1883

1933

Laheji

2568

Thana No.-392

2567

2541

2531

4250

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 16, 2018/JYAISTHA 26, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2529

2448

2447

Fazilpur

1509

Thana No.-364

Machkana

2144

Thana No.-214

2128

1142

Bhaishakhal

1046

Thana No.-154

739

Muin

2863

Thana No.-137

1509

2011

1762

1758

1770

1772

1773

Pokhrera

1029

Thana No.-76

1024

1022

Kuldipa

411

Thana No.-77

Sewtapur

2088

Thana No.-76

539

537

547

548

549

580

578

[F. No. R-11025(11)/196/2017-OR-I/E-9925]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 16] 2018@T;s"B 26] 1940

4251

Je vkSj jkstxkj ea=kky;

ubZ fnYyh] 24 ebZ] 2018

dk-vk- 946-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj Hkkjrh; LVsV

cSad ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 75@2015) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 24-05-2018 dks

çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&12011@45@2015&vkbZvkj (ch&I)º

jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

New Delhi, the 24th May, 2018

S.O. 946.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 75/2015) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank

of India and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 24.05.2018.

[No. L-12011/45/2015-IR (B-I)]

RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 23rd April, 2018

Reference: (CGITA) No. 75/2015

The General Manager,

State Bank of India,

Local Head Office, Lal Darwaja,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

The Branch Manager,

State Bank of India,

Radhanpur Branch, Dhiraj Chamber,

Lal Baug, Radhanpur, Pathan,

Ahmedabad

…First Party

V/s

The President,

Akhil Bhartiya Karmachari Mahasangh,

28-B, Narayan Park,

Behind Chandkheda Railway Station, Sabarmati,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

…Second Party

For the First Party No

Shri D.C. Gandhi Associates

For the Second Party

Shri R.S. Sisodiya

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-12011/45/2015–

IR(B-I) dated 04.09.2015 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in

respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

4252

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 16, 2018/JYAISTHA 26, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of State Bank of India, Radhanpur Branch, District Pathan, North

Gujarat in terminating the services of Shri I.M. Pathan, Armed Guard w.e.f. 15.02.2010 without issuing notice

to him is legal, just and proper? If not, to what relief the concerned workman, Shri I.M. Pathan, Armed Guard

is entitled to and what other directions are necessary in the matter?”

The reference dates back to 04.09.2015. The second party union The President, Akhil Bhartiya Karmachari

Mahasangh, 28-B, Narayan Park, Behind Chandkheda Railway Station, Sabarmati, Ahmedabad submitted the

statement of claim Ex. 3 on 10.02.2016 alleging that the workman I.M. Pathan, a retired Armed Guard from security

forces was engaged and appointed on 01.09.1993 in the State Bank of India, Radhanpur Branch, District Pathan where

he worked continuously till the year 2010. He was discharged from security forces on fictitious complaint which is

pending adjudication in the Hon’ble High Court. He was an honest person and was also removed from service from

State Bank of India on 15.02.2010 without serving any notice which was against the due procedure of law. The dispute

was raised by the second party union before the management of State Bank of India but to no result. Therefore, also the

management did not concede to demand of the second party union, the Reconciliation Officer referred the dispute to

the Government of India for adjudication. Thus the second party union has challenged the action of the removal from

service of the second party workman on the ground that his removal was against the procedure of law; therefore, he is

entitled for reinstatement.

The first party The General Manager, State Bank of India, Local Head Office, Lal Darwaja, Ahmedabad

(Gujarat) and The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Radhanpur Branch, Dhiraj Chamber, Lal Baug, Radhanpur,

Pathan, Ahmedabad, submitted a joined written statement Ex. 7 on 16.01.2017 partly admitting the averments made in

the statement of claim regarding his engagement as Armed Guard at Vasta Devdi Branch, Surat for 6 months from

01.09.1993. His services were confirmed from 01.03.1994 vide order dated 04.04.1994. It is further submitted that a

citizen named P.R. Mehta of Radhanpur lodged an FIR against the workman I.M. Pathan on 12.12.1998 alleging that

the workman persuaded the aforesaid complainant P.R. Mehta offering him cooked chicken and took him to his house

where the workman physically abused to him and has also threatened him to death. The Police into the said FIR

arrested the workman wherein the Police submitted the charge-sheet against him in the court. He was also put in the

judicial remand; therefore, the first party served him with the suspension order. It is further submitted that under

Paragraph 521 (2)(b) of the Sastri Award read with Paragraph 3 (b) and Clause 6 (2) of the aforesaid award, if the

workman is found guilty of gross misconduct under the aforesaid provisions, can be removed from service. Paragraph

521 (2)(b) of Sastri Award, read with Paragraph 3 (b) and Clause 6 (2) are as under: “By the expression, “offence” shall

be meant any offence involving moral turpitude for which an employee is liable to conviction and sentence under any

provisions of law.”

While, Provisions of Clause 3 (b) are as under:

“If, he be convicted, he may be dismissed with the effect from the date of his conviction or be given any lesser

forum of punishment as mentioned in Clause as below:

Clause 6:— “An employee found guilty of gross misconduct may

(a)

Be dismissed without notice.”

Thus under the aforesaid provisions, the services of the workman were terminated as he was convicted

under Section 377 read with 506 (2) of the IPC for a period of 3 years rigorous imprisonment with

Rs. 20000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) as fine.”

On the basis of the pleadings, the following issues arise:

Whether the action of the management of State Bank of India, Radhanpur Branch, District Pathan, North

Gujarat in terminating the services of I.M. Pathan, Armed Guard w.e.f. 15.02.2010 without issuing notice

to him is legal, just and proper?

II.

To what relief, if any, the concerned workman, I.M. Pathan, Armed Guard is entitled to and what other

directions are necessary in the matter?

Both these issues are interrelated, therefore, are decided together.

Issue No. I& II: The burden of proof of these issues was lying on the second party union who submitted the

affidavit Ex. 8 of the workman reiterating the averments made in the statement of claim but in his cross-examination,

the workman has admitted that his date of birth is 20.12.1954. His education qualification is 10th standard. He also

admitted that a person resident of Radhanpur lodged an FIR against him under Section 377 read with 506 (2) of the IPC

wherein he was sentenced for a period of 3 years rigorous imprisonment with Rs. 20000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand)

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 16] 2018@T;s"B 26] 1940

4253

as fine in Criminal Case No. 149/2009. He has also admitted that his reinstatement was denied due to the aforesaid

sentence.

The first party did not submit any oral evidence but submitted the photocopy of the memorandum of settlement

on disciplinary action procedure for workman Ex. 29. The said document has been admitted by the second party

workman. The settlement provide as under:

“By the expression “offence” shall be meant any offence involving moral turpitude for which an employee is

liable to conviction and sentence under any provisions of law.

(a)

When in the opinion of the management an employee has committed an offence, unless he may be

otherwise prosecuted, the bank may take steps to prosecute him or get him prosecuted and in such a case he

may also be suspended.

(b)

If he be convicted, he may be dismissed with effect from the date of his conviction or be given any lesser

form of punishment as mentioned in Clause 6 below.

(c)

If he be acquitted, it shall be open to the management to proceed against him under the provisions set out

below in Clauses 11 and 12 infra relating to discharge. However, in the event of the management deciding

after enquiry not to continue him in service, he shall be liable only for termination of service with three

months’ pay and allowances in lieu of notice. And he shall be deemed to have been on duty during the

period of suspension, if any, and shall be entitled to the full pay and allowances minus such subsistence

allowance as he has drawn and to all other privileges for the period of suspension provided that if he be

acquitted by being given the benefit of doubt he may be paid such portion of such pay and allowances as

the management may deem proper and the period of his absence shall not be treated as a period spent on

duty unless the management so directs.

(d)

If he prefers an appeal or revision application against his conviction and is acquitted, in case he had already

been dealt with as above and he applies to the management for reconsideration of his case, the management

shall review his case and may either reinstate him or proceed against him under the provisions set out

below in Clause 11 and 12 infra relating to discharge and the provisions set out above as to pay allowances

and the period of suspension will apply the period up to date for which full pay and allowances have not

been drawn being treated as one of suspension. In the event of the management deciding, after enquiry not

to continue him in service, the employee shall be liable only for termination with three months’ pay and

allowance in lieu of notice, as directed above.”

“6. An employee found guilty of gross misconduct may:

(a)

Be dismissed without notice; or

(b)

Be removed from service with superannuation benefits i.e. Pension and/or Provident Fund and

Gratuity as would be due otherwise under the rules or regulations prevailing at the relevant time and

without disqualification from future employment; or

(c)

Be compulsorily retired superannuation benefits i.e. Pension and/or Provident Fund and Gratuity as

would be due otherwise under the rules or regulations prevailing at the relevant time and without

disqualification from future employment; or

(d)

Be discharged from service with superannuation benefitsi.e. Pension and/or Provident Fund and

Gratuity as would be due otherwise under the rules or regulations prevailing at the relevant time and

without disqualification from future employment; or

(e)

Be brought down to lower stage in the scale of pay up to a maximum of two stages; or

(f)

Have his increment’s stopped with or without cumulative effect; or

(g)

Have his special pay withdrawn; or

(h)

Be warned or censured, or have an adverse remark entered against him; or

(i)

Be final. “

I heard the arguments of the learned counsel of the parties and also considered their evidences besides the

settlement, Paragraph 521 (2)(b) of the Sastri Award read with Paragraph 3 (b) and Clause 6 (2) of the aforesaid award

as well as the memorandum of settlement on disciplinary action procedure of workman Ex. 29 dated 18.12.2002. It is

admitted by the workman that he was put in suspension and was also terminated from service on the ground that he was

sentenced for a period of 3 years rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 20000/-(Rupees Twenty Thousand). Such

punishment deserves dismissal or termination of service under Paragraph 521 (2)(b) of the Sastri Award read with

4254

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 16, 2018/JYAISTHA 26, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Paragraph 3 (b) and Clause 6 (2) of the aforesaid award as well as the memorandum of settlement on disciplinary action

procedure of workman Ex. 29 dated 18.12.2002. Thus the action taken by the bank does not deserve any interference

by the tribunal. Thus the issue no. I is decided in affirmative and against the second party workman. Therefore, the

workman deserves no relief. Thus the issues no. I & II are decided accordingly.

The award is passed in terms of the observation made in Para 7 of the award.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 24 ebZ] 2018

dk-vk- 947-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj Hkkjrh;

if'peh jsyos ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 683@2004) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

24-05-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&41011@11@99&vkbZvkj (ch&I)º

jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 24th May, 2018

S.O. 947.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 683/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Western

Railway and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 24.05.2018.

[No. L-41011/11/99-IR (B-I)]

RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 27th April, 2018

Reference: (CGITA) No. 683/2004

The Principal,

Railway Staff College, Lalbaug,

Baroda (Gujarat) – 390004

The Chairman,

Railway Staff College Officer’s Mess Management Committee,

Lal Baug, Baroda (Gujarat) – 394220

…First Party

V/s

The General Secretary,

Western Railway Contractors Employees Union,

Faramji Road, Nr. Guard Running Room, Alkapuri,

Baroda (Gujarat) – 394220

…Second Party

For the First Party No

Shri K.V. Gadhia

For the Second Party

Shri M.V. Jadhav

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-41011/11/99–

IR(B-I) dated 26.10.1999 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in

respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 16] 2018@T;s"B 26] 1940

4255

SCHEDULE

“Whether the charter of demands raised by the General Secretary, Western Railway Contractors Employees

Union Vadodara vide its representation dated 05.08.1998 against the management of the Principal, Railway

Staff College, Vadodara and the Chairman, Railway Staff College Mess Management Committee, Vadodara is

proper and justified? If so, to what relief the concerned workmen are entitled to?”

The reference dates back to 26.10.1999. The second party union submitted the statement of claim Ex. 3 alleging

that the second party union is a registered union and its registration number is 5058. The concerned workmen working

in this railway staff college Mess and getting monthly salary of Rs. 1125 to 1822/-. The railway authority has not given

permanent status not paid the salary to those workmen detailed in the reference and they were paid less than the

minimum wage. At present, 33 workmen are there. The first party college give the education to the selected officers

and for providing the food facility to the officers. The college has started the mess from the day 1 of the establishment

of the college. The second party workmen are the workmen and the first party is an industry. The second party

workmen were working with the first party since last 20 to 25 years and they were paid less than the minimum wages.

Inspite of numerous complaints they were not paid even minimum wages. They were working under direct control of

Railway Administration. The first party deduct the provident fund and the second party workmen are working as clerk,

waiter, head cook and sweeper. The union has raised the demand vide letter dated 05.08.1998 and demand in increase

in wages, HRA, children education allowance, dues and other benefits since the first party has not response to the same,

the union has raised this dispute. The second party workmen have filed the case before the CAT in OA No. 180/1996

for permanency. The second party has stated that at present the minimum wage is Rs. 1950/- whereas the lowest

category permanent category grade is Rs. 4500/- per month. Therefore, they are entitled for the salary at par with

permanent employee. The second demand of the union is different in allowance likewise HRA, convence allowance,

attendance allowance etc. The union further stated that the allowances at present paid to the concerned workmen in

compare to the permanent employee are less hence they are entitled to get the aforesaid allowances as par with

permanent employees. The third demand of the union is regarding various leaves. The leaves are granted to the

concerned workmen are very less in compare to the government employees. They are not getting the benefit of ESI,

therefore, the demand is just, legal and proper and is to be granted with arrears. Regarding demand numbers 4, 5 and 6,

same are as per the provisions of the act. At present the concerned workmen are getting less than the minimum wages.

As per the act the first party is bound to pay minimum wages. The permanent employees of the railway paid the double

overtime whereas these workmen were not paid overtime and takes work from them for more than 8 years. Therefore,

the demand is justified and prayed for grant of demand with arrears. The second party union is the only union working

in the first party therefore the said union is considered as representative union and the benefits to the union

representative is to be given like to attend the union training course, the workmen education central course etc. and

prayed for granting the said benefits with cumulative effect. The union has demanded and prayed the aforesaid benefits

w.e.f. 01.01.1998 and prayed for cost of Rs. 5000 for litigation.

The first party submitted the written statement Ex. 9 denying the averments made in the statement of claim

submitted that the second party union approach the Central Administrative Tribunal vide OA No. 180/1996 wherein the

tribunal ordered for regularisation of all the workman detailed in the reference w.e.f. 22.02.1996. Thus the dispute

raised in the reference and prayers sought in the statement of claim are not tenable in the eye of law.

On the basis of the pleadings, the following issues arise:

Whether the charter of demands raised by the General Secretary, Western Railway Contractors Employees

Union Vadodara vide its representation dated 05.08.1998 against the management of the Principal, Railway

Staff College, Vadodara and the Chairman, Railway Staff College Mess Management Committee,

Vadodara is proper and justified?

II.

To what relief, if any, the concerned workmen are entitled?

Both the issues are interrelated, therefore, are decided together.

Issue No. I & II: The burden of proof of these issues was lying on the second party workman who was examined

vide document Ex. 20 wherein he has reiterated the averments made in the statement of claim and has not said anything

contrary in his cross-examination.

The first party has not examined any of his witness in support of the written statement.

Since long, neither of the parties and their advocates are appearing and the reference is pending for argument,

therefore, I considered the whole oral and documentary evidences on the record.

It is noteworthy that the second party union approached the Central Administrative Tribunal vide OA No.

180/1996 wherein the tribunal ordered for regularisation of all the workman detailed in the reference w.e.f. 22.02.1996.

The Central Administrative Tribunal in its order has granted regularisation as well as all the benefits of service w.e.f.

4256

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 16, 2018/JYAISTHA 26, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

22.02.1996 while the second party has sought the relief w.e.f. 01.01.1998. As the Central Administrative Tribunal has

already granted the relief as sought by the second party union from the aforesaid earlier date. Therefore, no further

relief can be granted being barred by the principle of res-judicata.

Thus the reference is finally disposed of as not maintainable.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 5 twu] 2018

dk-vk- 948-—vkS?kksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (a1947 dk 14 ) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

iatkc us”kuy cSad ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS?kksfxd fookn esa

dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS?kksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] dkuiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 59/2015) izdkf”kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh;

ljdkj dks 05.06.2018 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la0 ,y-12011/45/2015-vkbZ vkj (ch-II)]

jfo dqekj, vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 5th June, 2018

S.O. 948.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 59/2015) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, KANPUR(U.P.) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Punjab

National Bank, and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 05/06/2018.

[No. L-12011/45/2015 - IR(B-II)]

RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI SHUBHENDRA KUMAR, HJS, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOR COURT, KANPUR

ID No. 59/2015

Between :

The Member,

State Working Committee of UP Bank workers Org. ,

3/13 Mathura Nagar,

ALIGARH(U.P)-202001

AND

The General Manager,

Punjab National Bank,

7, Bhikaji Cama Place,

New Delhi.

AWARD

Central Government, MOL, New Delhi, vide notification no. L-12011/45/2015-IR(B-II) dated 03/08/2015 has

referred this Industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication.

‘Whether the action of the management of Punjab National Bank, New Delhi deciding payment of ex-gratia in

lieu of employment of compassionate ground to Smt. Sudha Rani W/o late Tara Chand conveyed vide letter dated

8th December, 2006 is legal & just and if not, what relief the concerned applicant is entitled to ?”

Union raising the dispute on behalf of worker Smt. Sudha Rani widow of Late Tara Chand has filed claim

petition alleging that Shri Tara Chand was appointed at the post of clerk on 15.10.1976 in the bank who was

subsequently promoted as officer. Unfortunately said Tara Chand expired on 12.04.2006 due to heart failure leaving

behind him 3 unemployed sons and one unemployed daughter. Smt. Sudha Rani widow of deceased employee has

applied for payment of ex-gratia amount within prescribed period on 29.04.2006 but the management vide their letter

dated 8.12.2006 rejected the request of Smt. Sudha Rani and their after she again made a request before the Chairman

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 16] 2018@T;s"B 26] 1940

4257

of the Bank but her request was again rejected by the Bank vide letter dated 18.05.2012. It is also alleged that bank has

also not provided any appointment on compassionate ground nor In lieu of it had made payment of any amount by way

of lump sum ex-gratia for which widow of Shri Tara Chand is entitled for the same.

Therefore on these grounds it has been prayed by the widow of Late Shri Tara Chand that the Bank be directed to

make payment of ex-gratia in view of employment on compassionate ground.

Management has filed objection against the claim petition admitting the fact that Shri Tara Chand was in the

employment of the Bank and was performing his duties in managerial/administrative capacity and was having power of

assigning duties and distribution of work as such his service condition were governed by officer employees regulation

therefore Late Tara Chand cannot be treated as workmen. It is also denied that any valid Industrial dispute exist

between the bank and the Union over the issue and thus the answering Bank raises an objection over the maintainability

of this issue/reference. It is further submitted by the Bank that the Bank had submitted the scheme for payment of

ex-gratia (lump sum amount) in lieu of appointment on compassionate grounds vide circular no. 235 dated 07.01.2005

and this scheme is a welfare measure to provide relief to the family of employee dying in harness or taking premature

retirement owing to incapacitation on medical grounds before attaining the age of 55 years to tide over the sudden crisis

brought out by such premature death/ incapacitation of the earning family member and to offer immediate financial

assistance and succor to the distrust family to recover from the unexpected deprivation of the income of the bread

winner. It is also stated that ex-gratia cannot be claimed as matter of right and same cannot be granted beyond the

preview of the guidelines of the Bank of which Para 9.2 provides that while dealing with the proposal for grant of ex-

gratia, in cases where discipline action was taken/pending against the employee dying in harness or where the deceased

employee was involved in financial irregularities, embezzlement of funds committing of frauds etc. Bank will continue

to avoid by the guidelines issued by the government of India requiring consideration and decision in each case by the

Board of the Bank. Similarly Para 19.4 provides that the ex-gratia relief under the above scheme is not entitlement but

may be granted at the soul discretion of the Bank looking into the financial condition of the family and in deserving and

eligible cases only.

It is further pleaded that the deceased husband of Smt. Sudha Rani was involved in financial irregularities and

3 penalties have been imposed on him for various lapses/ irregularities. The proposal of the claimant was placed before

the Board for consideration and the Board decline the request of the dependence of the deceased employee for payment

of ex-gratia (lump sum amount) in view of his involvement in financial irregularities.

It is further pleaded by the Bank that other dues like PF, Gratuity, Financial Aid and Contributory Benefit Fund

Scheme were timely paid to the legal heirs of Late Tara Chand. Lastly it is prayed that the claim of the Smt. Sudha

Rani is neither legal nor valid according to rules of the Bank therefore her claim is liable to be rejected.

Rejoinder statement has been filed by the union wherein it is pleaded that any family member of deceased

employee can raise claim for payment of ex-gratia amount for which it is not necessary that the deceased employee

should be a workman under the act.

It is pertinent to point out that when case was taken up for hearing on 13.04.18 none appeared on the behalf of the

parties, no documents have been filed therefore opportunity to lead evidence and to file documents is closed by fixing

25.04.18 in the case. Again on 25.04.18 none appeared in the case and the case was reserved for award.

10.

It is settled legal position that it is claimant who has prove his case by his evidence oral and documentary and

where neither any oral evidence nor documentary evidence has been adduced, the claimant is liable to face the music of

law in as much as in the absence of evidence his claim cannot be accepted by court of law and on same analogy as the

union / claimant Smt. Sudha Rani has not been able to prove their case by adducing admissible evidence therefore her

claim is liable to be rejected and is accordingly rejected.

11.

Reference is therefore answered against the union/claimant Smt. Sudha Rani.

SHUBHENDRA KUMAR, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 5 twu] 2018

dk-vk- 949-—vkS?kksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (a1947 dk 14 ) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

ikjknhi iksVZ VªLV ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjks ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS?kksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj vkS?kksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] Hkqous”oj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 36/2011) dks izdkf”kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh;

ljdkj dks 05.06.2018 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la0 ,y-38011/01/2011-vkbZ vkj (ch-II)]

jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf?kdkjh

4258

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 16, 2018/JYAISTHA 26, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 5th June, 2018

S.O. 949.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 36/2011) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Bhubaneswar as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Paradip Port

Trust, and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 05/06/2018.

[No. L-38011/01/2011 - IR(B-II)]

RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, BHUBANESWAR

Present:

Shri B.C. Rath,

Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-cum-Labour

Court, Bhubaneswar.

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 36/2011

No. L-38011/01/2011-IR(B-II), dated 18.07.2011

Date of Passing Award –13^th April, 2018

Between:

The Chairman,

Management Committee, Paradip Port,

Paradip, Dist. Jagatsinghpur, Orissa.

The President,

Paradip Port Stevedores’ Association,

Trade Centre (Ground Floor), Paradip Port,

Dist. Jagatsinghpur, Orissa – 754 142

…1^st Party-Managements

(And)

The General Secretary,

Utkal Port & Dock Workers’ Union,

Brundaban Colony, Housing Complex,

Paradip Port, Dt. Jagatsinghpur, Paradip,

Orissa – 754 142.

…2^nd Party-Union

Appearances:

None

…

For the 1^st Party-Managements

None

…

For the 2^nd Party-Union

AWARD

None of the parties are found present on repeated calls. It is seen from the record that after filing of Statement of

claim the 2^nd party-Union failed to attend the proceeding despite repeated notice. The 1^st Party-Management has already

submitted its written statement. The reference is lingering only due to non-attendance of the 2^nd party-Union. As the

Union failed to attend the proceeding as well as to adduce any evidence in addition to its claim there is no alternative

than to return the reference without giving any findings on the merit of the pleadings advanced by the parties.

The reference is disposed of in the above terms.

Dictated and Corrected by me.

B.C. RATH, Presiding Officer

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 16] 2018@T;s"B 26] 1940

4259

ubZ fnYyh] 5 twu] 2018

dk-vk- 950-—vkS?kksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (a1947 dk 14 ) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj cSad

vkQ cM+kSnk ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjks ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS?kksfxd fookn esa Je

U;k;ky;] vkSjaxkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- 06/2016) dks izdkf”kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 05.06.2018 dks izkIr gqvk

FkkA

[la- ,y-39025/01/2017-vkbZ vkj (ch-II)]

jfo dqekj, vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 5th June, 2018

S.O. 950.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 06/2016) of the Labour Court, Aurangabad as shown in the

Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Bank of Baroda, and their workmen, received by the

Central Government on 05/06/2018.

[No. L-39025/01/2017 - IR(B-II)]

RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

IN THE LABOUR COURT-I AT AURANGABAD

(Presided over by D.V.Joshi)

Ex. No. O-3

REFERENCE (IDA) NO. 06 of 2016

(CNR. No. MHLC-20-000234-2016)

Between :

The Dy. General Manager,

Bank of Baroda,

Main Branch, Talik Road,

P.B.No.40, Aurangabad - 431 001

…First Party

And

Shri Nandu Banshi Tupare,

Kranti Chowk, Ajab Nagar,

Opp. Telephone Bhavan, (Milind Nagar),

AURANGABAD - 431 001

…Second Party

Advocates:

Mr. S.S. Vidwauns for the second Party.

Mr. M.S.Mahajan for the First party.

AWARD

( Dtd. 17.04.2018 )

This Reference is referred by the Central Government u/s clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of

Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 for adjudication in respect of termination of second party.

After registration of said Reference notice was issued against both the parties. Second party appeared and

filed his statement of claim at Ex.U-2. Notice against the first party was duly served. Inspite of service of notice

first party has not filed written statement. Therefore, matter proceeded ex parte against the first party as per the

order below Ex.U-2.

The contention of the second party that he is a workman as per Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

and the first party is an industry. Second party was appointed as a Peon in the main Branch at Tilak Road, Aurangabad

on 17.06.2011 on daily wages. His service was continued by the first party till 25.07.2011. First party used to pay

wages on weekly basis by way of vouchers in the custody of the first party. Attendance register in the possession of

first party. Second party applied for the post of Peon in the recruitment procedure of 2013, but the second party was not

called for interview. Later on he got information that one Dinesh Chavan and Arjun Gaikwad were selected in the said

process and the said persons were junior daily wagers to the second party. Therefore, the act of the first party is against

the law and procedure. In the recruitment of 2014 considering the application of second party he was called for

4260

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 16, 2018/JYAISTHA 26, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

interview, but again he was not selected. Second party was even thereafter continued in the same Branch as a Peon. He

has completed more 240 days service without any break. First party has not followed the procedure as per Section 25F

& 25G of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Said termination order is illegal and liable to be set aside. Second party is

not gainfully employed. Therefore, he is entitled for reinstatement in service along with back wages.

Notice against the first party was duly served. Inspite of service of notice first party has not filed written

statement. Therefore, matter proceeded ex parte against the first party.

Following points arise for my determination. They are as under along with my findings thereon for the reasons

given below:

Sr. No.

Issues

Findings

Whether the second party proves that he has completed more

than 240 days in each year ?

In the affirmative.

Whether the second party proves that his oral termination

order is illegal and liable to be set aside ?

In the affirmative.

Whether the second party proves that he is entitled for

reinstatement in service with continuity along with back

wages ?

Partly in affirmative.

What Award ?

As per final Award.

REASONS

In order to prove his case, second party examined himself at Ex.U-4. He filed documents below Ex.U-6, U-11

and closed his evidence by filing pursis Ex.U-13.

As to Point Nos. 1 & 2:— Learned Advocate of the second party submits that second party workman has

completed 240 days continuous service with the first party without any break. He was orally terminated by the second

party without following procedure laid down under Section 25F & 25G of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Therefore,

termination order is illegal and liable to be set aside. Second party workman is entitled for reinstatement in service with

continuity along with back wages.

Second party workman at Ex.U-4 deposes that, he was working as a Peon with the first party bank and its branch

at Tilak Road, Aurangabad on daily wages from 17.06.2011 to 25.07.2015 without any break. He also deposes that for

the said period first party has paid bonus to him and he filed said slip of bonus below Ex.U-6/3 and below

Ex.U-11. First party has not produced any contrary evidence against the evidence of the second party. On perusal

of evidence and documents produced by the second party it shows that he was in continuous service for 4 years

with the first party. He filed application in the recruitment procedure on 2013 and 2014. He was not selected in the

said recruitment procedure. Even then also he was in continuous service with the first party till 25.07.2015.

From the said evidence it shows that he has continuously worked with the first party for more than

240 days in each year before termination. He also deposes that he has completed more than 240 days service

before his termination. First party has not complied provisions of Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

First party has violated the condition precedent for retrenchment. Therefore, termination is illegal and liable to be set

aside.

10.

Section 25 F & 25 B of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is as under : "Section 25 F :— Conditions precedent to

retrenchment of workmen.- No workman employed in any industry who has been in continuous service for not

less than one year under an employer shall be retrenched by that employer until -

(a)

the workman has been given one month's notice in writing indicating the reasons for retrenchment

and the period of notice has expired, or the workman has been paid in lieu of such notice, wages for

the period of the notice:

(b)

the workman has been paid, at the time of retrenchment, compensation which shall be equivalent to

fifteen days' average pay [for every completed year of continuous service] or any part thereof in

excess of six months; and

(c)

notice in the prescribed manner is served on the appropriate Government [or such authority as may

be specified by the appropriate Government by notification in the Official Gazette.]"

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 16] 2018@T;s"B 26] 1940

4261

"Section 25 B. Definition of continuous service.- For the purposes of this Chapter, —

(1)

a workman shall be said to be in continuous service for a period if he is, for that period, in

uninterrupted service, including service which may be interrupted on account of sickness or

authorise leave or an accident or a strike which is not illegal, or a lock-out or a cessation of work

which is not due to any fault on the part of the workman;

(2)

Where a workman is not in continuous service within the meaning of clause (1) for a period of one

year or six months, he shall be deemed to be in continuous service under an employer—

(a)

for a period of one year, if the workman, during a period of twelve calendar months preceding

the date with reference to which calculation is to be made, has actually worked under the

employer for not less than—

(i)

one hundred and ninety days in the case of a workman employed below ground in a mine;

and

(ii)

two hundred and forty days, in any other case;

(b) for a period of six months, if the workman, during a period of six calendar months preceding

the datge with reference to which calculation is to be made, has actually worked under the

employer for not less than -

(i)

ninety five days, in the case of a workman employed below ground in a mine; and

(ii) one hundred and twenty days, in any other case."

From the above provisions if, the employee has completed continuous service of 240 days as defined in Section

25 B of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 then employer has to follow the procedure laid down under Section 25F of

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

11.

Therefore, from oral evidence it shows that, second party has continuously worked for more lthan 240 days with

the first party before his termination in the last preceding year of his termination. He was orally terminated without

compliance of Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Therefore, non-compliance of Section 25F itself makes

termination order illegal. Therefore, oral termination order dated 25.07.2015 is illegal and liable to be set aside.

Therefore, I answer Points No.1 & 2 in the affirmative.

12.

As to Point No.3 :— On perusal of entire evidence and record, it shows that the appointment of second party

workman is not according to the due procedure of law. It is admitted fact that, he was not selected in the recruitment

procedure of 2013 and 2014. He has not filed any appointment letter on record. Therefore, in such circumstances

second party is not entitled for reinstatement on the said post. As the first party has not followed procedure laid

down under Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 while terminating the services of second party workman.

Therefore, considering the period of service of second party workman in place of reinstatement and back wages he is

entitled for monetary compensation of Rs.25,000/- (Rs.Twenty Five Thousand only) from the first party.

Therefore, I answer the point No.3 accordingly.

13.

As to Point No.4 :— As the termination order is illegal and set aside as the first party has not complied

provisions of Section 25 F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 while terminating the services of the second party.

As the appointment of second party is not according to due procedure of law. Therefore, instead of reinstatement

second party is entitled for compensation of Rs.25,000/- (Rs.Twenty Five Thousand only) from the first party.

Therefore, in order to answer point No.4 I pass the following Award :

AWARD

The Reference is answered partly in affirmative.

Termination order dated 25.07.2015 of second party is illegal, hence it is set aside.

The second party is entitled for monetary compensation of Rs.25,000/- from the first party.

Order be complied within the period of three months from the date of publication of Award.

No order as to costs.

The copy of the Award be sent to the Desk Officer, Government of India/Bhat Sarkar, Ministry of Labour/

Shram Mantralaya, New Delhi for publication and necessary action as per rules.

D.V. JOSHI, Presiding Officer & Judge

Date : 17.04.2018

4262

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 16, 2018/JYAISTHA 26, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

नई दली, 6 जून, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ. 951

951

951.—रापित, ी मुरलीधर धान पीठासीन अिधकारी, के सरकार औोिगक अिधकरण-सह-म यायालय,

हैदराबाद को दनांक 05.05.2018 से छ: माह क( आगे क( अविध तक अथवा िनयिमत पद,थ अिधकारी िनयुि- तक अथवा अगले

आदेश/ तक, जो भी पहले हो, पीठासीन अिधकारी, क0 सरकार औोिगक अिधकरण- सह- म यायालय, ब1गलोर के पद का अित2र-

भार स4पते है ।

[सं. ए-11016/03/2009-सीएलएस-II]

अजय मिलक, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 6th June, 2018

S.O. 951.—The President is pleased to extend the period of additional charge of the post of Presiding Officer

of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Bangalore entrusted to Shri Murlidhar Pradhan,

Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour, Hyderabad for a further period of 06 months

with effect from 05.05.2018, or till the appointment of a regular incumbent, or until further orders, whichever is the

earliest.

[No. A-11016/03/2009-CLS-II]

AJAY MALIK, Under Secy.

ubZ fnYyh] 12 twu] 2018

dk-vk- 952-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ-lh-

,y- ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vfèkdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 04@2008) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

06-06-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&22012@345@2007&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º

jktsUæ flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 12th June, 2018

S.O. 952.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Corrigendum of Award (Ref. No. 04/2008) of the Central Government Industrial

Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of

M/s. E.C.L. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 06.06.2018.

[No. L-22012/345/2007-IR (CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

IN THE COURT OF CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL

Ref.: Ministry’s Order No. L-22012/345/2007 - IR (CM-II) dated 07.01.2008

This office Reference No. 04 of 2008 dated 16.01.2008

Management of Parascole Colliery under Kajora Area of M/s. ECL

v/s

Shri Krishna Bhuiya

SETTLEMENT IN LOK ADALAT

Held on 17^th May, 2018 at C.G.I.T.-cum- L.C., Asansol

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 16] 2018@T;s"B 26] 1940

4263

AWARD

On amicable settlement by both parties the dispute is resolved in the Lok Adalat. The Form ‘H’ containing

the terms of agreement of this settlement to be executed by both the parties in due course. Award is passed and signed

accordingly.

PRAMOD KUMAR MISHRA, Presiding Officer

IN THE COURT OF CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL

LOK ADALAT SETTLEMENT

Place : Asansol

Date : 17.05.2018

Reference No. 04 of 2008

Parascole Colliery under Kajora Area of M/s. ECL

v/s

Shri Krishna Bhuiya

Both the parties hereby mutually and amicable settle up the dispute for the interest of both sides and to help

securing a healthy & conducive relationship for maximization of output in the industry.

Terms :-

• Reinstatement of the concerned employee in the initial basic of General Mazdoor Category – I and treating

the period of his absence as dies non. The concerned employee will also get continuity of service for the

purpose of Gratuity only. He will not get any Back Wages.

Shri S. Goswami

Dy. Manager (Personnel), Kajora Area, M/s. ECL

Shri S.K. Pandey

Gen. Secy., CM.C. (H.M.S.)

(Representative of the Workman)

Shri Ashish Mohan

Assistant Manager (Personnel), Parascole Colliery, M/s. ECL

PRAMOD KUMAR MISHRA

(Presiding Officer)

ubZ fnYyh] 12 twu] 2018

dk-vk- 953-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ

bZ-lh-,y- ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vfèkdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 04@2016) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

06-06-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&22012@95@2015&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º

jktsUæ flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 12th June, 2018

S.O. 953.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Corrigendum of Award (Ref. No. 04/2016) of the Central Government Industrial

Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of

M/s. E.C.L. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 06.06.2018.

[No. L-22012/95/2015-IR (CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

4264

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 16, 2018/JYAISTHA 26, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ANNEXURE

IN THE COURT OF CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL

Ref.: Ministry’s Order No. L-22012/95/2015 - IR (CM-II) dated 23.12.2015

This office Reference No. 04 of 2016 dated 08.01.2016

Management of Parascole Colliery under Kajora Area of M/s. ECL

v/s

Shri Sanjeeb Kora

SETTLEMENT IN LOK ADALAT

Held on 17^th May, 2018 at C.G.I.T.-cum- L.C., Asansol

AWARD

On amicable settlement by both parties the dispute is resolved in the Lok Adalat. The Form ‘H’ containing

the terms of agreement of this settlement to be executed by both the parties in due course. Award is passed and signed

accordingly.

PRAMOD KUMAR MISHRA, Presiding Officer

IN THE COURT OF CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL

LOK ADALAT SETTLEMENT

Place : Asansol

Date : 17.05.2018

Reference No. 04 of 2016

Parascole Colliery under Kajora Area of M/s. ECL

v/s

Shri Sanjeeb Kora

Both the parties hereby mutually and amicable settle up the dispute for the interest of both sides and to help

securing a healthy & conducive relationship for maximization of output in the industry.

Terms :-

•

Reinstatement of the concerned employee in the initial basic of General Mazdoor Category–I and treating

the period of his absence as dies non. The concerned employee will also get continuity of service for the

purpose of Gratuity only. He will not get any Back Wages.

Shri S. Goswami

Dy. Manager (Personnel), Kajora Area, M/s. ECL

Shri Sajeeb Kora

(Workman)

Shri Ashish Mohan

Assistant Manager (Personnel), Parascole Colliery, M/s. ECL

PRAMOD KUMAR MISHRA

(Presiding Officer)

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 16] 2018@T;s"B 26] 1940

4265

ubZ fnYyh] 12 twu] 2018

dk-vk- 954-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ

ch-lh-lh-,y- ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 08@2011) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

06-06-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&22012@12@2011&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º

jktsUæ flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 12th June, 2018

S.O. 954.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Corrigendum of Award (Ref. No. 08/2011) of the Central Government Industrial

Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of

M/s. B.C.C.L. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 06.06.2018.

[No. L-22012/12/2011-IR (CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL

PRESENT : Shri Pramod Kumar Mishra, Presiding Officer

REFERENCE NO. 08 OF 2011

PARTIES :

The management of Begunia Colliery / Project of M/s. BCCL

v/s

Shri Biswajit Bandyopadhyay

REPRESENTATIVES :

For the Management

Shri P. K. Das, Learned Advocate

For the Union (Workmen)

Shri Gora Chand Chatterjee, Learned Union Representative

Industry : Coal

State : West Bengal

DATED : 10.05.2018

A W A R D

In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-section(1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947), Govt. of India through the Ministry of Labour vide its letter

NO. L-22012/12/2011-IR(CM-II) dated 18.05.2011 has been pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by

this Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

“ Whether the action of management of Begunia Colliery / Project under Chanch Victoria Area of M/s. Bharat

Coking Coal Limited in not giving wages from 16.07.2004 to 10.02.20085 along with all consequential

benefits such as (i) Arrear payment of NCWA–VIII effective from 01.07.2006 (ii) LTC/LLTC – for the block

year 2004-2007 (iii) Annual increment off the year 2004 to 2007 (iv) pending TA bills for the period from

10.09.2003 to 09.074.2004 (v) Annual Bonus for the service period i.e. from 2004 to 2007 (vi) Quarterly

Bonus for the service period i.e. from 2004 to 2007 (vii) benefit of basic fitment of wages (viii) any other

consequential benefits arising out of wrongful withdrawal of service / illegal stoppage from duty (ix)

continuity in service for the period from 16.07.2004 to 10.02.2008 and benefit of Gratuity linked there is fair

and justified? To what relief the concerned workman Shri Biswajit Bandyopadhyay is entitled to? ”

Having received the Order NO. L-22012/12/2011-IR(CM-II) dated 18.05.2011 of the above said

reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a Reference

4266

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 16, 2018/JYAISTHA 26, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Case No. 08 of 2011 was registered on 07.06.2011. Accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue notices

through the registered post to the parties concerned, directing them to appear in the court, on the date fixed and to file

their written statements along with the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In

pursuance of the said order notices by the registered post were sent to the parties concerned. Both the parties appeared

in the Tribunal, through their representative.

Shri Mukti Pada Banerjee father of concerned workman was in employment of Begunia Colliery / Project under

Chanch Victoria Area of M/s. Bharat Coking Coal Limited as Dy. Personnel Manager in E IV Grade. He was declared

medically unfit on 19.08.1991 by competent medical board. Therefore he proceeded on Voluntary Retirement on

Medical Ground w.e.f. 06.12.1991 vide Ref No. BCCL/EE/91/26513-21 (A) dated 06.12.1991. There is provision for

providing one employment to the dependent of the person who seeks Voluntary Retirement on Medical Ground. Shri

Mukti Pada Banerjee preferred claim for the employment of his son Shri Biswajit Bandyopadhyay but the same was

regretted. Shri Mukti Pada Banerjee filed a Writ Petition before the Hon’ble High Court of Kolkata. The Hon’ble High

Court of Kolkata was pleased to pass order to consider the case of son of Shri Mukti Pada Banerjee on compassionate

ground in terms of provision of Common Coal Cadre preferably within 6 (Six) weeks. The management of Begunia

Colliery / Project under Chanch Victoria Area of M/s. Bharat Coking Coal Limited in compliance with the Hon’ble

Kolkata High Court’s judgment provided provisional employment to Shri Biswajit Bandyopadhyay as General

Mazdoor. After providing employment the management of Begunia Colliery / Project under Chanch Victoria Area

of M/s. Bharat Coking Coal Limited filed an appeal before the Hon’ble Kolkata High Court. The Hon’ble Kolkata High

Court was pleased to pass an order on 09.09.2003 with direction to the management to consider giving employment to

the son of petitioner, if he is suitable for post within a period of 4 (Four) weeks. The management of Begunia Colliery/

Project under Chanch Victoria Area of M/s. Bharat Coking Coal Limited against the order of the Hon’ble Kolkata High

Court filed special writ petition in 2004 before the Hon’ble Supreme Court. The Hon’ble Supreme Court stayed the

operation of impugned order dated 09.09.2003 of the Hon’ble Kolkata High Court. In view of the Order of the Hon’ble

Supreme Court the employment of Shri Biswajit Bandyopadhyay was withdrawn vide Letter No. BCCL/PA-VI/

11269-74 dated 14/15.07.04. Consequently Shri Biswajit Bandyopadhyay was stopped form employment w.e.f.

16.07.2004 the Hon’ble Supreme Court dismissed the Appeal No. 5462 of 2005. The Hon’ble Supreme Court observed

that since the appeal is dismissed, therefore Interim Order dated 16.01.2004 is set-a-side. In light of order of the

Hon’ble Supreme Court the management of Begunia Colliery / Project under Chanch Victoria Area of M/s. Bharat

Coking Coal Limited again provided employment to Shri Biswajit Bandyopadhyay vide Office Order No.

DY.CPM/CV/Pers/00/08/150 dated 28.01.2008. Shri Biswajit Bandyopadhyay since then has been working as General

Mazdoor. The concerned workman Shri Biswajit Bandyopadhyay had to remain idle form 16.07.2004 to 10.02.2008

without his fault. He was deprived of the following benefits which are as follows :

(i)

Wages for the period 16.07.2004 to 10.02.2008 (for the period of years 6 months and 25 days)

(ii)

Arrear Payments as per NCWA VII effective from 01.07.2001.

(iii)

Arrear Payments of wages as per NCWA VIII effective from 01.07.2006.

(iv)

LTC / LLTC for the block year 2004 to 2007.

(v)

Annual increment from 2004 to 2007.

(vi)

Pending TA Bill from 10.09.2003 to 09.07.2004.

(vii)

Annual Bonus for the year 2004 to 2007.

(viii)

Quarterly Bonus from 2004 to 2007.

(ix)

Benefit of Basic fitment of wages.

(x)

Continuity of service for the broken period and benefit of Gratuity.

(xi)

Any other benefit arising out of wrongful withdrawal of Service like promotion to next higher grade/ Post.

The concerned workman shall be allowed continuity of service and all benefits during his period of idleness.

The management of Begunia Colliery / Project under Chanch Victoria Area of M/s. Bharat Coking Coal Limited has

not allowed the concerned workman the continuity of service and consequential benefits even at the time of providing

employment for 2^nd time as per order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court. The workman has prayed that the Tribunal may

kindly consider the claim of the workman Shri Biswajit Bandyopadhyay and direct the management of Begunia

Colliery / Project under Chanch Victoria Area of M/s. Bharat Coking Coal Limited to pay all these monetary benefits

including the continuity of service as mentioned above.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 16] 2018@T;s"B 26] 1940

4267

The management of Begunia Colliery / Project under Chanch Victoria Area of M/s. Bharat Coking Coal

Limited has filed written statement. The management of Begunia Colliery / Project under Chanch Victoria Area of M/s.

Bharat Coking Coal Limited has admitted in their written statement that Shri Biswajit Bandyopadhyay was dependent

son of Shri Mukti Pada Banerjee. He was offered appointment on compassionate ground, as dependent son of Shri

Mukti Pada Banerjee, on the post of General Mazdoor. The management of Begunia Colliery / Project under Chanch

Victoria Area of M/s. Bharat Coking Coal Limited has admitted in his written statement that on rejection of

appointment proposal of Shri Biswajit Bandyopadhyay son of Shri Mukti Pada Banerjee, Shri Mukti Pada Banerjee

moved to the Hon’ble Kolkata High Court. On the order of the Hon’ble Kolkata High Court Shri Biswajit

Bandyopadhyay was offered provisional employment on the post of General Mazdoor. The appeal of management of

Begunia Colliery / Project under Chanch Victoria Area of M/s. Bharat Coking Coal Limited was also dismissed by the

Hon’ble Kolkata High Court. The management of Begunia Colliery / Project under Chanch Victoria Area of M/s.

Bharat Coking Coal Limited filed Special Leave Petition before the Hon’ble Supreme Court. The Hon’ble Supreme

Court passed an interim order on 16.01.2004 and stayed the operation of order of the Hon’ble Kolkata High Court

dated 09.09.2003. But ultimately the Hon’ble Supreme Court Civil Appeal no. 5462 of 2005 dismissed the appeal of

Begunia Colliery / Project under Chanch Victoria Area of M/s. Bharat Coking Coal Limited. The Hon’ble Supreme

Court by dismissing the appeal vacated the stay order dated 16.01.2004. The management of Begunia Colliery / Project

under Chanch Victoria Area of M/s. Bharat Coking Coal Limited has also admitted that consequently Shri Biswajit

Bandyopadhyay was offered 2^nd time employment. Management of Begunia Colliery / Project under Chanch Victoria

Area of M/s. Bharat Coking Coal Limited passed the order to re-instate Shri Biswajit Bandyopadhyay. Consequently

Shri Biswajit Bandyopadhyay joined on the post of General Mazdoor. The management of Begunia Colliery / Project

under Chanch Victoria Area of M/s. Bharat Coking Coal Limited has alleged that the concerned workman Shri Biswajit

Bandyopadhyay is not entitled for payment form 16.07.2004 to 10.02.2008 because he was not in service. But

management of Begunia Colliery / Project under Chanch Victoria Area of M/s. Bharat Coking Coal Limited has

admitted that for the period in which Shri Biswajit Bandyopadhyay was in service he is entitled for Arrear payment as

per National Coal Wage Agreement – VII. He is also entitled for LTC / LLTC for Block year 2004-2007. He is also

entitled for pending TA bill. Rest of the benefit has been denied.

Workman has filed the following documentary evidences :

(i) Photocopy of the Letter Ref No. BCCL/EE/91/26513-21 (A) dated 06.12.1991, (ii) Photocopy of the Ref.

No. DCPM/XII/03/A-7/93/1520 dated 14/15.06.1993, (iii) Photocopy of the decision of the Hon’ble Kolkata High

Court dated 11.11.1998, (iv) Photocopy of the Letter Bef. No. CGM.DCPM:XII 03:A-7/Disability/HC/99/2367 dated

22.10.1999, (v) Photocopy of the decision of the Hon’ble Kolkata High Court dated 09.09.2003, (vi) Photocopy of the

Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 42 of 2004, (vii) Photocopy of the Letter Ref. No. BCCL/PA-VI/11269-74

dated 14/15.07.2004, (viii) Photocopy of the Award of Civil Appeal No. 5462 of 2005, (ix) Photocopy of the Letter

Ref. No. DCPM/CV/Pers/00/08/150 dated 28.01.2008, (x) Photocopy of the Letter Ref. No. BCCL/XII/BP/09/151

dated 09.02.1999, (xi) Copy of National Coal Wage Agreement – VII Implementation Instruction No. 1

The workman Shri Biswajit Bandyopadhyay has filed affidavit in his oral evidence. He has been cross-

examined by the learned advocate of the management of Begunia Colliery / Project under Chanch Victoria Area of

M/s. Bharat Coking Coal Limited.

The management of Begunia Colliery / Project under Chanch Victoria Area of M/s. Bharat Coking Coal

Limited has filed any documentary or oral evidence.

I have heard the arguments of Shri Gora Chand Chatterjee, learned Joint General Secretary of Dhanbad

Colliery Karmachari Sangh (B.M.S) on behalf of the workman and Shri P. K. Das learned advocate on behalf of the

management of Begunia Colliery / Project under Chanch Victoria Area of M/s. Bharat Coking Coal Limited.

Shri P. K. Das, learned advocate of the management has argued that since workman Shri Biswajit

Bandyopadhyay was out of employment for the period 16.07.2004 to 10.02.2008 he is not entitled for any service

benefits as claimed by the workman. On the other hand Shri Gora Chand Chatterjee, learned union representative,

representing the workman has argued that the workman Shri Biswajit Bandyopadhyay was offered employment on

compassionate ground on the order of the Hon’ble Kolkata High Court. Since, the order was stayed by the Hon’ble

Supreme Court his service was discontinued. But in final order the Hon’ble Supreme Court dismissed the appeal. In

light of the order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court Shri Biswajit Bandyopadhyay was re-instated therefore he is entitled

for all the service benefits.

It is admitted by both the parties that Shri Biswajit Bandyopadhyay is son of Shri Mukti Pada Banerjee. Shri

Mukti Pada Banerjee was an employee of Begunia Colliery / Project under Chanch Victoria Area of M/s. Bharat

Coking Coal Limited on the post of Dy. Personnel Manager. It is also admitted fact that as per provision of Common

Coal Order if any workman seeks Voluntary Retirement on Medical ground his dependent son is entitled for

employment on Compassionate ground. But the employment proposal of Shri Biswajit Bandyopadhyay was rejected

4268

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 16, 2018/JYAISTHA 26, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

by the management of Begunia Colliery / Project under Chanch Victoria Area of M/s. Bharat Coking Coal Limited.

Shri Biswajit Bandyopadhyay was offered employment as per direction of the Hon’ble Kolkata High Court. In appeal

the Hon’ble Kolkata High Court reaffirmed its order. In Special Leave Petition the Hon’ble Supreme Court passed

interim order and stayed the order of the Hon’ble Kolkata High Court. But the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal

No. 5462 of 2005 dismissed the appeal of management of Begunia Colliery / Project under Chanch Victoria Area of

M/s. Bharat Coking Coal Limited and clarified that interim order dated 16.01.2004 does not survive.

In view of the above admitted facts it is apparent that Shri Biswajit Bandyopadhyay was offered employment as

per direction of the Hon’ble Kolkata High Court though. In light of interim order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court the

Order of the Hon’ble Kolkata High Court was stayed. But management of Begunia Colliery / Project under Chanch

Victoria Area of M/s. Bharat Coking Coal Limited without waiting the final order in Civil Appeal No. 5462 of 2005

discontinued the service of Shri Biswajit Bandyopadhyay. In Final Order in Civil Appeal No. 5462 of 2005 the Hon’ble

Supreme Court dismissed the appeal and vacated the order of interim stay dated 16.01.2004. Consequently the

management of Begunia Colliery / Project under Chanch Victoria Area of M/s. Bharat Coking Coal Limited had no

option left but to permit the joining of Shri Biswajit Bandyopadhyay in second time. Had the management of Begunia

Colliery / Project under Chanch Victoria Area of M/s. Bharat Coking Coal Limited, in his wisdom, would have waited

for final order this situation would not have arisen.

In this factual matrix it is needless to say that Shri Biswajit Bandyopadhyay, in spite of provision of Common

Coal Cadre for compassionate appointment was unable to get employment without intervention of the Hon’ble Kolkata

High Court and the Hon’ble Supreme Court. His period of idleness i.e. form 16.07.2004 to 10.02.2008 was without his

own fault. At the cost of repetition it is relevant to mention that if management of Begunia Colliery / Project under

Chanch Victoria Area of M/s. Bharat Coking Coal Limited would have waited for the final order of the Hon’ble

Supreme Court Shri Biswajit Bandyopadhyay would not have been thrown form employment form 16.07.2004 to

10.02.2008. It will be deemed that he was in employment form 16.07.2004 to 10.02.2008. In light of National Coal

Wage Agreement he is entitled for service benefits as claimed in his written statement.

10.

In light of above discussion the action of management of Begunia Colliery / Project under Chanch Victoria

Area of M/s. Bharat Coking Coal Limited in not giving wages from 16.07.2004 to 10.02.20085 along with all

consequential benefits such as (i) Arrear payment of NCWA–VIII effective from 01.07.2006 (ii) LTC/LLTC – for the

block year 2004-2007 (iii) Annual increment off the year 2004 to 2007 (iv) pending TA bills for the period from

10.09.2003 to 09.074.2004 (v) Annual Bonus for the service period i.e. from 2004 to 2007 (vi) Quarterly Bonus for the

service period i.e. from 2004 to 2007 (vii) benefit of basic fitment of wages (viii) any other consequential benefits

arising out of wrongful withdrawal of service / illegal stoppage from duty (ix) continuity in service for the period from

16.07.2004 to 10.02.2008 and benefit of Gratuity linked there is unfair and unjustified. The workman Shri Biswajit

Bandyopadhyay is entitled for above mentioned benefits.

O R D E R

Let an “Award” be and the same is passed as per above discussion. Send the copies of the order to the Govt. of

India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for information and needful. The reference is accordingly disposed of.

PRAMOD KUMAR MISHRA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 12 twu] 2018

dk-vk- 955-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ-lh-

,y- ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vfèkdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 26@2009) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

06-06-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&22012@34@2009&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º

jktsUæ flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 12th June, 2018

S.O. 955.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 26/2009) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. E.C.L. and

their workmen, received by the Central Government on 06.06.2018.

[No. L-22012/34/2009-IR (CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 16] 2018@T;s"B 26] 1940

4269

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL

PRESENT : Shri Pramod Kumar Mishra, Presiding Officer

REFERENCE NO. 26 OF 2009

PARTIES :

The management of Lachipur Colliery of M/s. ECL

v/s

Shri Barun Chandra Mondal

REPRESENTATIVES :

For the Management

Shri P. K. Das, Learned Advocate

For the Union (Workmen)

Shri Rakesh Kumar, Gen. Secy. of K.M.C.

Industry : Coal

State : West Bengal

DATED : 16.05.2018

A W A R D

In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-section(1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947), Govt. of India through the Ministry of Labour vide its letter

NO. L-22012/34/2009–IR (CM-II) dated 10.11.2009 has been pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication

by this Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

“ Whether the action of the management of M/s. ECL in not promoting Shri Barun Chandra Mondal, Asstt.

Foreman to the post of Foreman is legal and justified? To what relief is the workman concerned entitled? ”

Having received the Order NO. L-22012/34/2009–IR (CM-II) dated 10.11.2009 of the above said reference

from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a Reference Case No.

26 of 2009 was registered on 30.11.2009. Accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through the

registered post to the parties concerned, directing them to appear in the court, on the date fixed and to file their written

statements along with the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance of the said

order notices by the registered post were sent to the parties concerned. Both the parties appeared in the Tribunal,

through their representative.

Case called out. Shri P. K. Das, learned advocate appeared on behalf of the management of Lachipur Colliery of

M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited and Shri Rakesh Kumar, union representative appeared on behalf of the workman

Shri Barun Chandra Mondal.

Shri Rakesh Kumar representative of the workman Shri Barun Chandra Monda submits that the case may be

closed as the workman is not interested to proceed with the case further. He also made an endorsement on the Order

Sheet to this effect. Since, the workman as well as the union are now not at all interested to proceed with the case

further. Therefore the Tribunal has no option left but to close the case. As such the case is closed and accordingly a

‘No Dispute Award’ is hereby passed.

O R D E R

Let an “Award” be and the same is passed as per above discussion. Send the copies of the order to the Govt. of

India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for information and needful. The reference is accordingly disposed of.

[PRAMOD KUMAR MISHRA, Presiding Officer]

ubZ fnYyh] 12 twu] 2018

dk-vk- 956-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ-lh-

,y- ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

4270

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 16, 2018/JYAISTHA 26, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

vfèkdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 15@2009) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

06-06-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&22012@152@2005&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º

jktsUæ flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 12th June, 2018

S.O. 956.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Corrigendum of Award (Ref. No. 15/2009) of the Central Government Industrial

Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of

M/s. E.C.L. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 06.06.2018.

[No. L-22012/152/2005-IR (CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL

PRESENT : Shri Pramod Kumar Mishra, Presiding Officer

REFERENCE NO. 15 OF 2009

PARTIES :

The management of Ratibati Colliery of M/s. ECL

v/s

Late Shri Budhan Bouri

REPRESENTATIVES :

For the Management

Shri P. K. Das, Learned Advocate

For the Union (Workman)

None

Industry : Coal

State : West Bengal

Dated : 11.05.2018

A W A R D

In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-section(1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947), Govt. of India through the Ministry of Labour vide its letter

NO. L-22012/152/2005–IR (CM-II) dated 23.03.2009 has been pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication

by this Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

“ Whether the action of the management of M/s. ECL in not providing employment to the dependent of Late

Shri Budhan Bouri is legal and justified? To what relief is the dependent entitled? ”

Having received the Order NO. L-22012/152/2005–IR (CM-II) dated 23.03.2009 of the above said reference

from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a Reference Case No.

15 of 2009 was registered on 31.03.2009 / 01.04.2009. Accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue notices

through the registered post to the parties concerned, directing them to appear in the court, on the date fixed and to file

their written statements along with the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In

pursuance of the said order notices by the registered post were sent to the parties concerned. Both the parties appeared

in the Tribunal, through their representative.

Case called out. Shri P. K. Das, learned advocate appeared on behalf of the management of Ratibati Colliery of

M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited and filed his authorization. But none appeared on behalf of the workman Late Shri

Budhan Bouri.

On perusal of the case record I find that the workman / union has not been appearing before the Tribunal from

the very beginning. Since then 14 dates have been granted. Registered notices were also issued on 08.04.2009,

16.01.2014 and 09.07.2015 but all are in vain. It seems that the workman has no interest to proceed with the reference.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 16] 2018@T;s"B 26] 1940

4271

As such no dispute exists between both the parties and I have no option left but to close the case. As such the case is

closed and accordingly a ‘No Dispute Award’ is hereby passed.

O R D E R

Let an “Award” be and the same is passed as per above discussion. Send the copies of the order to the Govt. of

India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for information and needful. The reference is accordingly disposed of.

[PRAMOD KUMAR MISHRA, Presiding Officer]

ubZ fnYyh] 12 twu] 2018

dk-vk- 957-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

egkfunsZf'kd] Hkkjrh; iqjkrRo losZ{k.k ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn

esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] dkuiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 19@2006) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh;

ljdkj dks 29-05-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&42012@54@2005&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º

jktsUæ flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 12th June, 2018

S.O. 957.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 19/2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Kanpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Director

General, Archaelogical Survey of India and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 29.05.2018.

[No. L-42012/54/2005-IR (CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI SHUBHENDRA KUMAR, HJS,

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT

SHRAM BHAWAN, ATI CAMPUS, UDYOG NAGAR, KANPUR

ID. No. 19 of 2006

The General Secretary,

All India Archaeological Survey Mazdoor Union,

43/305/18, Nai Awadi,

Near Mission Church, Sikandara,

AGRA(U.P)-282007

Versus

The Director General,

Archaelogical Survey of India,

Janpath,

New Delhi-110011

The Superintending Archaeologist,

Archeological Survey of India,

Agra Division, 22, Mall Road,

AGRA (U.P)-282001.

A W A R D

Central Government, MOL, vide notification no. L-42012/54/2005-IR (CM-II) dated 24.02.2006 has referred

the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication.

“Whether the claim of the union for reinstatement & regularization in services of Shri Rakesh S/o Shri Ram

Chandra & 7 others (list enclosed) is legal and justified? If yes to what relief the workmen concerned are entitled?”

4272

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 16, 2018/JYAISTHA 26, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

List of Workers made part of the reference order

Sl.

No.

Name of the Workman

Period of service rendered

Place where was Posted

Shri Rakesh S/o Ramchandra

1.4.1997 to 31.7.2003

Chinikaroja, Kaliburj etc.

Shri Balbirsingh S/o Tikaram

1.1.1998 to 28.7.2003

Kaliburg, Rambagh etc.

Shri Ramborashi S/o Pritam Singh

6.4.1997 to 31.3.2002

Mahtab Bagh, Jaswant Singh etc.

Shri Omi S/o Tikaram

1.1.1996 to 31.3.2001

Atmadoula, Rambagh, Chini etc.

Shri Puransingh S/o Ojhammanlal

6.1.1997 to 30.6.2003

As above

Shri Brij Mohan S/o Hotilal

1.4.96 to 25.3.2001

As above

Shri Choub singh S/o Nathilal

10.1.2002 June, 2003

Atmudoula

Smt. Bhagwan dei W/o Dhaniram

1.8.1997 to 31.5.2003

Chini ka Roja, Jaswant Singh ki Chatri etc.

The union raising the dispute on behalf of the above workers has stated in its statement of claim that the above

workers have been employed as casual labors by the opposite party at different monuments located at Agra who have

worked continuously for more than 240 days in each calendar year from the date of their initial engagements till the

date of their respective disengagement. It is further pleaded that at the time of disengagement of their services

management has not complied with the provisions of section 25H and 25G of the Act. The union further pleaded that

hundreds of junior casual labors are still in the employment of the management at different monuments but the disputed

workers were not retained in the service by the management and as such management has breached the provisions of

Rule 77 and 78 of I.D. Rules. Their services have been dispensed with by the management without any reason or rhyme

thus the worker himself with their family members are facing problems of starvation. Worker Chob Singh died during

the pendency of the dispute on 08.04.15.

In this way the Union has prayed that the workers shown in the enclosed list be reinstated from the date of

their disengagement with full back wages and be declared as regular employee.

The union has filed certain photocopies of documents with their claim statement and that shall be dealt with at

the appropriate stage while discussing the merit of the case.

In reply the management has filed their written statement alleging therein that the allegations of the union are

baseless, false and fictitious. It is stated that the applicants had worked during the intermittent periods for short

durations against sanctioned estimates and they were disengaged as soon as the works ere completed or the funds

exhausted. The provisions of Industrial Disputes Act are not applicable upon the management and the casual labors like

the applicants cannot claim their continuation in work or regularization as a matter of right. It is further alleged that the

applicants had left the engagement of their own and hence exigency of work required the utilization of other casual

labors to complete given assignment. The department has its obligations and it is unanswerable to the teeming millions

of the country and the respondent cannot wait to return of the applicants to wok to complete the assignment. The work

is time bound and the sanctioned items of work of a year have to be completed in the same year.

It is stated in the written statement that Sri Rakesh has worked for 78 days in the year 1987, 130 days in the

year 1999-2000 and 158 days in the year 2001. Likewise Balbir has worked for 83 days during the period 1.12.99 to

28.02.2001 and Sri Ram Bharose has worked for 111 days in 2000, Sri Pooram Singh has worked for 439 days during

the period from 1.9.98 to 31.8.2003 and Sri Braj Mohan has worked for 295 days during the period from 1.8.97 to

29.3.2001 and Sri Chob Singh has worked for 26 days in the year 1999 and lastly Smt. Bhagwan dei has never worked

with the management.

Accordingly it is prayed that under the facts and circumstances narrated herein above the claim of the union be

rejected.

In the instant case no rejoinder statement has been filed by the union.

10.

On behalf of Union Rakesh has been examined as w.w.1, whereas the management has examined Raj Narain

as M.W.1, in support of their respective cases.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 16] 2018@T;s"B 26] 1940

4273

11.

I have heard the arguments of both the parties and have also gone through the records of the case.

12.

The reference is with regard to reinstatement and regularization in the service of worker under the

management. As the union itself has admitted in the claim statement that the workers whose case is referred to this

Tribunal were working as casual labor, therefore, the demand of the union for regularization of services of worker

cannot be held legal and justified as per settled legal position that casual employee has no right to claim regularization

of his service therefore these casual employee cannot be granted relief of regularization of their service under the

management.

13.

As regards breach of provisions of section 25H of the act, it has to be seen in this case that whether the worker

have worked with the management and whether management after terminating the services of workers have inducted

fresh hands in service without considering the fact that retrenched workers should be given priority in reemploying

fresh worker as casual labours.

14.

WW1 Rakesh, worker has stated on oath that his services were terminated without notice and retrenchment

compensation. He further stated that after disengagement management appointed 40 new faces in the service. He has

also stated that the workers worked for more than 240 days which fact is denied by management witness MW1

Sri Raj Narayan who has stated that Smt. Bhagwan dei had never worked with the management and seven other

workers have not worked continuously for 240 days.

15.

As worker Rakesh in his statement on oath has specifically stated that after their retrenchment management

has engaged 40 new faces and this fact was neither rebutted by the management witness Raj Narayan nor there was any

cross examination of witness Rakesh WW1 on this point. Therefore this statement of worker stands un- rebutted. It is

settled law by Hon’ble Apex Court and several Hon’ble High Courts that for applicability of section 25H of the act it is

not required that a worker must be under continuous employment for 240 days.

16.

Worker has also filed information received under RTI act from the management which shows that 4 person in

group D were engaged from 2010 by way of direct recruitment and also from SSC. It is also proved that after

termination of worker management engaged persons from outside also apart from engaging worker through SSC at the

post of MTS and it is also case of management (to quote para 3 of management parawise reply) wherein it is alleged

that the spirit of the judgment of the Hon’ble apex court holds that while granting engagement to a particular person,

the department should not be oblivious of the requirements of the teeming millions of the country. Their interests are

also needed to be guarded. However, it is submitted that the applicants had left the engagements on their own and

hence exigencies of work required the utilization of other casual laborers to complete given assignments. The

department has its obligations and it is answerable to the teeming millions of the country. The answering respondent

cannot wait for the return of the applicants to work to complete the assignment. The works are time bound and the

sanctioned items of work of a year have to be competed in the same year. Hence, if one does not turn up, the

department has to get the work done by other available work force. The claims of the applicants do not stand to any

legal justification.

17.

The admission made by the management in para 3 (Supra) it absolutely contradicts the provisions of 25H of

the act and is directly against it. It is provided in section 25H of ID ACT of 1947 that if employer proposes to take up

into his employment any person, it is duty of employer to give an opportunity to the retrenched workman to offer

themselves for reemployment and those retrenched workmen who offers themselves shall have preference over other

persons.

18.

As provided in section 25H of the act it was duty of the management that before giving employment to

another person from outside, first to call upon the retrenched employee and offer them for reemployment. As

management failed to adopt the provision of section 25H of the ID ACT and have not stated anywhere that workers

were given notices offering their reemployment, therefore, the action of the management for not reinstating the workers

mentioned at serial no. 1 to 6 as above in service is neither legal nor justified.

19.

As worker Chob Singh mentioned at serial no.7 was admittedly died during the pendency of this dispute and

Smt. Bhagwan Dei had never worked with the management, hence they are held entitled to no relief.

20.

Having concluded that the action of the management is in gross violation of section 25-H of Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947, when they failed to offer reemployment to the workers involved in the present case at the time of

engaging fresh persons, it is held that the action of the management in not reinstating the workers in their service is

neither legal nor just.

21.

Accordingly Shri Rakesh s/o Ram Chandra is entitled to be reinstated in service w.e.f 1.08.2003, Shri Balbir

Singh s/o Tikaram is held entitled for his reinstatement form 29.07.2003, Shri Ramborashi s/o Pritam Singh is entitled

for his reinstatement w.e.f from 1.4.2002, Shri Omi s/o Tikaram is entitled for his reinstatement w.e.f 1.4.2001,

4274

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 16, 2018/JYAISTHA 26, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Shri Puran singh s/o Ojhammanlal is entitled for his reinstatement w.e.f 1.7.2003 and lastly Shri BrajMohan s/o Hotilal

is held entitled for his reinstatement w.e.f 26.3.2001, in the services of Management.

22.

As regards admissibility of back wages to these workers is concerned, admittedly workers have failed to prove

that they were not in gainful employment anywhere else during the period they remained outside the job of the

management, hence it is held that they are not entitled for any back wages, but shall be entitled for continuity of service

and other consequential benefits.

23.

In view of above observations the reference is answered in favor of the Union and against the management.

SHUBHENDRA KUMAR, Presiding Officer

Uploaded by Dte. of Printing at Government of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi-110064

and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi-110054.

ALOK

KUMAR

Digitally signed

by ALOK KUMAR

Date: 2018.06.29

19:45:48 +05'30'