3287 GI/2018
(4275)
jftLVªh la- Mh- ,y- (,u) 04@0007@2003µ05
REGD. No. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05
izkf/dkj ls izdkf'kr
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
lkIrkfgd
WEEKLY
la- 24]
ubZ fnYyh] twu 17—twu 23] 2018] 'kfuokj@T;s"B 27—vk"kk<+ 2] 1940
No. 24]
NEW DELHI, JUNE 17—JUNE 23, 2018, SATURDAY/JYAISTHA 27—ASADHA 2, 1940
bl Hkkx esa fHkUu i`"B la[;k nh tkrh gS ftlls fd ;g i`Fkd ladyu ds :i esa j[kk tk lds
Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation
Hkkx II—[k.M 3—mi&[k.M (ii)
PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)
Hkkjr ljdkj ds ea=kky;ksa (j{kk ea=kky; dks NksM+dj) }kjk tkjh fd, x, lkafof/d vkns'k vkSj vf/lwpuk,a
Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India
(Other than the Ministry of Defence)
िव त
िव त
िव त
िव त मंालय
मंालय
मंालय
मंालय
(राज व
राज व
राज व
राज व िवभाग
िवभाग
िवभाग
िवभाग)
(िह दी
िह दी
िह दी
िह दी अनुभाग
अनुभाग
अनुभाग
अनुभाग-2)
नई द ली, 17 मई, 2018
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 958
958
958
958.—के ीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासकय योजन के िलए योग) िनयम, 1976 के िनयम 10 के उपिनयम
(4) के अनुसरण म$ राज% व िवभाग के अधीन के ीय कर, व% तु एवं सेवाकर एवं क$ ीय उ* पाद शु क आयु- तालय, गौतम बु0 नगर, िजसके
80 ितशत से अिधक कम1चा3रय ने िह दी का काय1 साधक 5ान ा6 त कर िलया है, को अिधसूिचत करती है।
[फा.सं. ई-11017/3/2017-िह दी-2 डीओआर डीओआर]
डॉ. सतीश च , संयु- त िनदेशक (राजभाषा)
4276
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
(HINDI SECTION-2)
New Delhi, the 17th May, 2018
S.O. 958.—In pursuance of sub rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for Official Purpose of the
Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government, hereby notifies Central tax, Goods and Service tax and central excise
Commissionerate, Gautam Buddh Nagar, under the Department of Revenue, where more than 80% staff have acquired the
working knowledge of Hindi.
[F. No. E-11017/3/2017-Hindi-II DOR DOR]
Dr. SATISH CHANDRA, Jt. Director (OL)
नई द ली, 17 मई, 2018
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 959
959
959
959.—के ीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासकय योजन के िलए योग) िनयम, 1976 के िनयम 10 के उपिनयम
(4) के अनुसरण म$ राज% व िवभाग के अधीन आयु- त काया1लय, सीमा शु क: हवाई काग: िनया1त, नई द ली, िजसके 80 ितशत से
अिधक कम1चा3रय ने िह दी का काय1 साधक 5ान ा6 त कर िलया है, को अिधसूिचत करती है।
[फा.सं. ई-11017/3/2017-िह दी-2 डीओआर डीओआर]
डॉ. सतीश च , संयु- त िनदेशक (राजभाषा)
New Delhi, the 17th May, 2018
S.O. 959.—In pursuance of sub rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for Official Purpose of the
Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government, hereby notifies Office of the Commissioner, Customs: Air Cargo Export,
New Delhi, under the Department of Revenue, where more than 80% staff have acquired the working knowledge of
Hindi.
[F. No. E-11017/3/2017-Hindi-II DOR DOR]
Dr. SATISH CHANDRA, Jt. Director (OL)
नई द ली, 17 मई, 2018
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 960
960
960
960.—के ीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासकय योजन के िलए योग) िनयम, 1976 के िनयम 10 के उपिनयम
(4) के अनुसरण म$ राज% व िवभाग के अधीन सीमा शु क आयु- त का काया1लय, सीमा शु क गृह, कोि= च-682009, िजसके 80 ितशत से
अिधक कम1चा3रय ने िह दी का काय1 साधक 5ान ा6 त कर िलया है, को अिधसूिचत करती है।
[फा.सं. ई-11017/3/2017-िह दी-2 डीओआर डीओआर]
डॉ. सतीश च , संयु- त िनदेशक (राजभाषा)
New Delhi, the 17th May, 2018
S.O. 960.—In pursuance of sub rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for Official Purpose of the
Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government, hereby notifies Office of the Commissioner of Customs, Custom House,
Coachin-682009, under the Department of Revenue, where more than 80% staff have acquired the working knowledge of
Hindi.
[F. No. E-11017/3/2017-Hindi-II DOR DOR]
Dr. SATISH CHANDRA, Jt. Director (OL)
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940
4277
नई द ली, 13 जून, 2018
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 961
961
961
961.—के ीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासकय योजन के िलए योग) िनयम, 1976 के िनयम 10 के उपिनयम
(4) के अनुसरण म$ राज% व िवभाग के अधीन णाली एवं आंकड़ा बंधन महािनदेशालय, क$ीय उ*पाद एवं सीमा शु क, नई द ली,
िजसके 80 ितशत से अिधक कम1चा3रय ने िह दी का काय1 साधक 5ान ा6 त कर िलया है, को अिधसूिचत करती है।
[फा.सं. ई-11017/3/2017-िह दी-2 डीओआर डीओआर]
डॉ. सतीश च , संयु- त िनदेशक (राजभाषा)
New Delhi, the 13th June, 2018
S.O. 961.—In pursuance of sub rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for Official Purpose of the
Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government, hereby notifies Directorate general of Systems & data management,
Customs & Central Excise, New Delhi, under the Department of Revenue, where more than 80% staff have acquired the
working knowledge of Hindi.
[F. No. E-11017/3/2017-Hindi-II DOR DOR]
Dr. SATISH CHANDRA, Jt. Director (OL)
नई द ली, 13 जून, 2018
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 962
962
962
962.—के ीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासकय योजन के िलए योग) िनयम, 1976 के िनयम 10 के उपिनयम
(4) के अनुसरण म$ राज% व िवभाग के अधीन के ीय व% तु एवं सेवाकर तथा के ीय उ* पाद शु क, नागपुर-1 आयु- तालय के 4 भागीय
काया1लय (भाग-शहर, @हगना, भंडारा,चंपुर), िजसम$ 80 ितशत से अिधक कम1चा3रय ने िह दी का काय1 साधक 5ान ा6 त कर िलया
है, को अिधसूिचत करती है।
[फा.सं. ई-11017/3/2017-िह दी-2 डीओआर डीओआर]
डॉ. सतीश च , संयु- त िनदेशक (राजभाषा)
New Delhi, the 13th June, 2018
S.O. 962.—In pursuance of sub rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for Official Purpose of the
Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government, hereby notifies, The 4 Divisional Offices (Division-City, Hingna,
Bhandara, Chandrapur) of CGST & Central Excise Nagpur-1 Commissionerate under the Department of Revenue, where
more than 80% staff have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi.
[F. No. E-11017/3/2017-Hindi-II DOR DOR]
Dr. SATISH CHANDRA, Jt. Director (OL)
नई द ली, 13 जून, 2018
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 963
963
963
963.—के ीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासकय योजन के िलए योग) िनयम, 1976 के िनयम 10 के उपिनयम
(4) के अनुसरण म$ राज% व िवभाग के अधीन सीमा शु क आयु- तालय पुणे एवं इसके अधीन% थ सभी मंडल काया1लय, िजसम$ 80 ितशत
से अिधक कम1चा3रय ने िह दी का काय1 साधक 5ान ा6 त कर िलया है, को अिधसूिचत करती है।
[फा.सं. ई-11017/3/2017-िह दी-2 डीओआर डीओआर]
डॉ. सतीश च , संयु- त िनदेशक (राजभाषा)
New Delhi, the 13th June, 2018
S.O. 963.—In pursuance of sub rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for Official Purpose of the
Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government, hereby notifies Commissionerate of Customs, Pune and its Subordinate all
divisional offices, under the Department of Revenue, where more than 80% staff have acquired the working knowledge of
Hindi.
[F. No. E-11017/3/2017-Hindi-II DOR DOR]
Dr. SATISH CHANDRA, Jt. Director (OL)
4278
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
नई द ली, 13 जून, 2018
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 964
964
964
964.—के ीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासकय योजन के िलए योग) िनयम, 1976 के िनयम 10 के उपिनयम
(4) के अनुसरण म$ राज% व िवभाग के अधीन के ीय व% तु एवं सेवा कर तथा क$ीय उ* पाद शु क आयु- तालय, मुंबई मध् य, िजसके 80
ितशत से अिधक कम1चा3रय ने िह दी का काय1 साधक 5ान ा6 त कर िलया है, को अिधसूिचत करती है।
[फा.सं. ई-11017/3/2017-िह दी-2 डीओआर डीओआर]
डॉ. सतीश च , संयु- त िनदेशक (राजभाषा)
New Delhi, the 13th June, 2018
S.O. 964.—In pursuance of sub rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for Official Purpose of the
Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government, hereby notifies CGST & Central Excise Commissionerate, Mumbai
Central, under the Department of Revenue, where more than 80% staff have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi.
[F. No. E-11017/3/2017-Hindi-II DOR DOR]
Dr. SATISH CHANDRA, Jt. Director (OL)
नई द ली, 13 जून, 2018
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 965
965
965
965.—के ीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासकय योजन के िलए योग) िनयम, 1976 के िनयम 10 के उपिनयम
(4) के अनुसरण म$ राज% व िवभाग के अधीन के ीय माल एवं सेवा कर आयु- तालय, चंडीगढ़, िजसके 80 ितशत से अिधक कम1चा3रय ने
िह दी का काय1 साधक 5ान ा6 त कर िलया है, को अिधसूिचत करती है।
[फा.सं. ई-11017/3/2017-िह दी-2 डीओआर डीओआर]
डॉ. सतीश च , संयु- त िनदेशक (राजभाषा)
New Delhi, the 13th June, 2018
S.O. 965.—In pursuance of sub rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for Official Purpose of the
Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government, hereby notifies Central Goods and Service Tax Commissionerate,
Chandigarh, under the Department of Revenue, where more than 80% staff have acquired the working knowledge of
Hindi.
[F. No. E-11017/3/2017-Hindi-II DOR DOR]
Dr. SATISH CHANDRA, Jt. Director (OL)
dkfeZd] yksd f’kdk;r rFkk isa’ku ea=ky;
¼dkfeZd vkSj izf’k{k.k foHkkx½
ubZ fnYyh] 13 twu] 2018
dk-vk- 966.—dsUnz ljdkj ,rn~}kjk naM izfdz;k lafgrk] 1973 ¼1974 dk vf/kfu;e la- 2½ dh /kkjk 24 dh mi/kkjk
¼8½ }kjk iznRr 'kfä;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, l= U;k;ky; tcyiqj] e/; izns’k esa fnYyh fo’ks"k iqfyl LFkkiuk ¼lhchvkbZ½ }kjk
laLFkkfir dsl la[;k vkjlh 1¼,l½@2014@,llh;w&V@,llh&II@ubZ fnYyh esa mifLFkr gksus rFkk buls mRiUu izklafxd
vU; ekeyksa esa vihy@iqujh{k.k dk lapkyu djus ds fy, Jh :Lre [kku] vf/koDrk dks mudh fu;qfDr dh rkjh[k ls rhu
o"kksZa ds fy, vFkok mudks lkSais x, ekeyksa ds fuiVku rd] tks Hkh igys gks] fo’ks"k yksd vfHk;kstd ds :i esa fu;qDr djrh
gSA
[Qk- la- 225@18@2017&,ohMh&II]
,y- ih- 'kekZ] voj lfpo
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940
4279
MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS
(Department of Personnel and Training)
New Delhi, the 13th June, 2018
S.O. 966.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (8) of section 24 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Rustam Khan, Advocate as Special Public
Prosecutor for conducting case No. RC 1(S)/2014/SCU.V/SC-II/New Delhi instituted by the Delhi Special Police
Establishment (C.B.I.) in the Sessions Court at Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh and appeals and revisions or other matters
connected there with or incidental thereto for a period of three years from the date of appointment or disposal of the case
whichever is earlier.
[F.No. 225/18/2017-AVD-II]
L. P. SHARMA, Under Secy.
नई द ली, 13 जून, 2018
का
का
का
का.आ.
.आ.
.आ.
.आ. 967
967
967
967.—के सरकार एतद्Bारा द ली िवशेष पुिलस % थापना अिधिनयम, 1946 (1946 का अिधिनयम संC या 25) क
धारा 6 के साथ प3ठत धारा 5 क उपधारा (1) Bारा दE शिFय का योग करते Gए िHपुरा राI य सरकार, गृह िवभाग अगरतला क
अिधसूचना सं. एफ.21(2)-पीडी/12(पी)/872 दनांक 17.03.2018 के माJ यम से ाK सहमित से िजरािनया के शांतनु भौिमक, पुH
Mी सदन भौिमक, पिNम िHपुरा िजला क ह*या के संबंध म$ भारतीय दंड संिहता क धारा 332/333 के साथ प3ठत धारा
148/149/302/120(बी), 1860(1860 का अिधिनयम संCया 45), तथा लोक सRपिE नुकसान िनवारण अिधिनयम,1984 (1984 का
अिधिनयम संCया 3) क धारा 3 के अंतग1त, मंडयी पुिलस थाना मामला संCया 2017/एमडीआई/006, दनांक 20.09.2017 म$ अवेषण
के िलए तथा उ- त मामले म$ भारतीय दंड संिहता म$ वSणत एक अथवा एक से अिधक अपराध से सR ब0 म$ कए गए यास, दुT ेरणाU
और षWंH तथा उसी संX यवहार म$ कए गए या उ हY तZ य से उ* प न ासंिगक कोई अ य अपराध अथवा अपराध क जांच करने के
िलए द ली िवशेष पुिलस % थापना के सद% य क शिFय और [ेHािधकार का िव% तार सम% त िHपुरा राI य म$ करती है ।
[फा. सं. 228/22/2018-एवीडी-II]
एल. पी. शमा1, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 13th June, 2018
S.O. 967.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub section (1) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi
Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (Act No. 25 of 1946), the Central Government with the consent of State
Government of Tripura, Home Department issued vide Notification No. F.21(2)-PD/12(P)/872 dated Agartala,
17.03.2018, hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment in the
whole of the State of Tripura for investigation in the Mandai PS Case No. 2017/MDI/006, dated 20.09.2017 U/s
148/149/302/120(B) IPC read with section 332/333 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860(Act No. 45 of 1860), and Section 3 of
Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 (Act No. 3 of 1984) in connection with the death of Santanu
Bhowmik, Son of Sri Sadhan Bhowmik of Jirania, West Tripura District and attempts, abetments and conspiracies in
relation to or in connection with one or more of the offences mentioned in the Indian Penal Code and any other offence
or offences committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the said facts.
[F. No. 228/22/2018-AVD-II]
L. P. SHARMA, Under Secy.
ubZ fnYyh] 13 twu] 2018
dk-vk- 968.—dsUnz ljdkj ,rn~}kjk naM izfdz;k lafgrk] 1973 ¼1974 dk vf/kfu;e la- 2½ dh /kkjk 24 dh mi/kkjk
¼8½ }kjk iznRr 'kfä;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, tyxkWo] egkjk"Vª fLFkr l= U;k;ky; ds le{k ekeyk la- vkjlh
02¼,l½@2007&eqEcbZ ¼oh-th- ikfVy gR;k ekeyk½ ,oa vihyh;@iqujh{k.k U;k;ky; esa rRlEcU/kh vihyksa@iqujh{k.kksa ;k muls
lEc) vU; ekeyksa rFkk buds vuq"kafxd ekeyksa ds lapkyu ds fy, Jh vkRekjke txUukFk ikfVy] vf/koDrk dks ekeys ds
fuLRkkj.k ;k vxys vkns’kksa rd tks Hkh igys gks] ds fy, fo’ks"k yksd vfHk;kstd ds :i esa fu;qDr djrh gSA
[Qk- la- 225@23@2016&,ohMh&II]
,y- ih- 'kekZ] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 13th June, 2018
S.O. 968.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (8) of section 24 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Atmaram Jagannath Patil, Advocate, Jalgaon,
4280
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
as Special Public Prosecutor, for conducting trial of case RC 2(S)/2007-Mumbai (V.G. Patil Murder case) before the
Court of Session at Jalgaon, Maharashtra and appeals or revisions or other matters arising out of the said case before the
appellate or revisional court, till disposal of the case or until further order, whichever is earlier.
[F.No. 225/23/2016-AVD-II]
L. P. SHARMA, Under Secy.
नई द ली, 14 जून, 2018
का
का
का
का.आ.
.आ.
.आ.
.आ. 969
969
969
969.—क$ीय सरकार, दंड ^या संिहता, 1973 (1974 का अिधिनयम सं. 2) क धारा 24 क उपधारा (8) Bारा
दE शिFय का योग करते Gए, Mी बी.बी. बदामी, अिधव- ता को, िवशेष यायाधीश, क$ीय अ वेषण ` यूरो, मुRबई के यायालय म$
द ली िवशेष पुिलस % थापन (के ीय अ वेषण ` यूरो) Bारा संि%थत वाद सं. आरसी.6/ई/2015-बीएस एंड एफसी/सीबीआई, मुRबई
(आईडीबीआई/bकगफशर एयरलाइस वाद, सीबीआई बनाम िवजय माया और अय) का और अपील, पुनरी[ण और उससे संबंिधत
और उसके आनुषंिगक अय मामल का संचालन के िलए, िनयुिF क तारीख से तीन वष1 के िलए या कांउसेल को सeपे गए उF मामले का
िनपटारा होने तक या अगले आदेश तक, इनम$ से जो भी पूव1तर हो, िवशेष लोक अिभयोजक के fप म$ िनयु- त करती है ।
[फा. सं. 225/09/2017-एवीडी-II]
एल. पी. शमा1, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 14th June, 2018
S.O. 969.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (8) of section 24 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure, 1973 (Act No. 2 of 1974), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri B.B. Badami, Advocate as Special
Public Prosecutor for conducting prosecution in case No. RC.6/E/2015-BS&FC/CBI, Mumbai (IDBI/Kingfisher Airlines
case, CBI V/s Vijay Mallya and others) instituted by the Delhi Special Police Establishment (C.B.I.) in the court of
Special Judge, CBI, Mumbai and appeals, revisions and other matters connected there with and incidental thereto for a
period of three years from the date of appointment or disposal of the said case entrusted to the counsel or till further
orders, whichever is earlier.
[F. No. 225/09/2017-AVD-II]
L. P. SHARMA, Under Secy.
कृिष एवं कसान क या
कृिष एवं कसान क या
कृिष एवं कसान क या
कृिष एवं कसान क याण मं
ण मं
ण मं
ण मंालय
ालय
ालय
ालय
(कृकृकृकृिष
िष
िष
िष, सहकारता एवं कसान क या
सहकारता एवं कसान क या
सहकारता एवं कसान क या
सहकारता एवं कसान क याण िवभाग
ण िवभाग
ण िवभाग
ण िवभाग)
नई द ली, 14 जून, 2018
का
का
का
का.आ.
.आ.
.आ.
.आ. 970
970
970
970.—बG-राIयीय सहकारी सिमितयां अिधिनयम, 2002 (2002 का 39) के खंड 4 के उपखंड (1) Bारा दत
शि- तय का योग करते Gए भारत सरकार क अिधसूचना सं. एल-11012/2/2003-एल एवं एम दनांक 11 मई, 2015 के अिध^मण म$
के सरकार एतद्Bारा Mी दनेश कुमार, संयुF सिचव (सहका3रता) को कृिष एवं कसान क याण मंHालय, कृिष, सहका3रता एवं कसान
क याण िवभाग म$ त*काल भाव से अथवा अगले आदेश तक सहकारी सिमितय के के ीय पंजीयक के fप म$ िनयुF करती हj ।
[सं. एल-11012/2/2003-एल एवं एम]
सुशील कुमार झा, अवर सिचव
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940
4281
MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FARMERS WELFARE
(Department of Agriculture, Cooperation and Farmers Welfare)
New Delhi, the 14th June, 2018
S.O. 970.—In exercise of the powers conferred vide sub-section (1) of Section 4 of the Multi-State Cooperative
Societies Act, 2002 (39 of 2002) and in supersession of the Government of India Notification No. L-11012/2/2003-L&M
dated 11th May, 2015, the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Dinesh Kumar, Joint Secretary (Cooperation) in the
Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Department of Agriculture, Cooperation and Farmers Welfare, as the
Central Registrar of Cooperative Societies with immediate effect and until further orders.
[No. L-11012/2/2003-L&M]
SUSHIL KUMAR JHA, Under Secy.
उपभोा मामले, खा! और साव#जिनक िवतरण मंालय
उपभोा मामले, खा! और साव#जिनक िवतरण मंालय
उपभोा मामले, खा! और साव#जिनक िवतरण मंालय
उपभोा मामले, खा! और साव#जिनक िवतरण मंालय
(उपभोा मामले िवभाग)
(उपभोा मामले िवभाग)
(उपभोा मामले िवभाग)
(उपभोा मामले िवभाग)
(भारतीय मानक %यूरो
भारतीय मानक %यूरो
भारतीय मानक %यूरो
भारतीय मानक %यूरो)
(कोि' च
कोि' च
कोि' च
कोि' च शाखा
शाखा
शाखा
शाखा)
कोि= च , 12 जून, 2018
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 971
971
971
971.—भारतीय मानक ` यूरो (माणन) िविनयम 1988 के िविनयम (4) के उपिविनयम (5) के अनुसरण म$ भारतीय
मानक ` यूरो एतद्Bारा अिधसूिचत करता है क िजनके िववरण नीचे अनुसूची म$ दए गए हj, को लाइस$स दान कए गए हj:-
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
01
01
01
01 जुलाई
जुलाई
जुलाई
जुलाई 2015
2015
2015
2015 से
से
से
से 31
31
31
31 माच#
माच#
माच#
माच# 2016
2016
2016
2016 तक वी
तक वी
तक वी
तक वीकृकृकृकृत कए गए
कए गए
कए गए
कए गए लाइस+स,
लाइस+स,
लाइस+स,
लाइस+स, क- सूची
क- सूची
क- सूची
क- सूची
^म
सं
लाईसेनस संCया
वैधता ितथी
पाटm का नाम एवं पता (कारखाना)
मानक के शीष1क
आई एस सं/
भाग/खंड/वष1
1
6400021185
02.07.2015
जासिमन जुवलेस1
िव पी 1/298 चूनाड जंगषन इला6पाकुलं
पी ओ
वेली-कुलं
आला6पुषा
केरला- 690 503
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
2
6400021589
08/07/2015
मज़रा गोड
बी पी4/838 एल/िनयर रिजडर आफस
बालुशोरी कालीकड
कोिषpोट
केरला- 673 612
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
3
6400021690
08/07/2015
इलातु Iवेलरी
डोर सं 14/207 (ओड 6/846 सी)
थिनरमुकं पी ओ ,चेथ1ला
आला6पुषा
केरल 688 527
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
4
6400021791
15/07/2015
अलाइका गोड Iवेलरी
कtरकलथानी कंजीरामु-कु
मल6पुरम
केरल- 679584
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
4282
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
5
6400021892
15/07/2015
अमर गोड और डायमंuस
%माट1 स$टर िब@डग िनयर ाईवेट बस
%टjड माला
िHशूर
केरल- 680732
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
6
6400021993
15/07/2015
पालाितगल Iवैलरी
डोर नंबर X / 561 नारागढ़ी, vालाथुर
पीओ नमनामघाट
िHशूर
केरल 679563
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
7
6400022086
20/07.2015
िचHा Iवेलरी
डोर नंबर VI/ 108-ए च$wामकुलम
अलककोदे पीओ
मला6पुरम
केरल 679591
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
8
6400022187
20/07/2015
धनालxमी Iवेलरी
टी.सी. 37/883 राजधानी िब@डग, फोट1,
फोट1 पीओ
ितyवनंतपुरम
केरल 695023
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
9
6400022288
20/07/2015
िभमा और zादर बुिलयन ाइवेट िलिमटेड
िभम टॉवर, 1526/700 ए
िHवेम रोड रेलवे %टेशन,
कोलम
केरल 691001
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:1999
10
6400022389
20/07/2015
िभमा और zादर बुिलयन ाइवेट
िलिमटेड
िभम िब@डग, 779-1,
िनयर के एस आर टी सी बस %टjड
पलpड़
केरल 678014
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
11
6400022490
20/07/2015
िभमा और zादर बुिलयन ाइवेट
िलिमटेड
िभम टॉवर, 588-1,2 वे%ट पैलेस रोड
िHशूर
केरल 680020
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
12
6400022591
22/07/2015
रेजीथ Iवेलरी
िनयर रेलवे गेट
पी.पी XIV / 452 (ओलड) पी पी
XVIII-19 (नई) पाि6पिनशेरी
क{णूर
केरल 670561
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
13
6400022692
22/07/2015
%टार Iवेलरी
डूर नंबर XI/ 633 (यू) VI / 113
(ओड) पु|यूरकुलाम पीओ
िHशूर
केरल 679561
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
14
6400022793
22/07/2015
सीपीए Iवेलरी
िब@डग नंबर 5/729 ए (ओलड),
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
आई एस
1417:2016
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940
4283
10/1039 (यू) सीपीए जं-शन, ईडाव|ा
मल6पुरम
केरल 676541
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
15
6400022894
22/07/2015
पुिलक$स Iवेलरी
XX609, रोड चेरपु, चेरपू पीओ
िHशूर
केरल 680561
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
16
6400022995
22/07/2015
कोचुिव3}ल ले-शमी Iवेलरी
बेिसिसयल हॉि%पटल रोड कोतमंगलम
एरनाकुलम
केरल 686691
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
17
6400023088
22.07.2015
%वपन Iवेलस1
पाडा दि[ण, मुCय सड़क
कyनागपली
कोलम
केरल 690518
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
18
6400023189
22.07.2015
िचरpल गोड
मुितचुकारन, 529 बी
चेyपु wामपंचायत,
XVII िचरा6पु
िHशूर- 680561
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
19
6400023492
24.07.2015
िचHा Iवेलस1
वीएमसी 17/47 डेना कॉR6ले-स
पुEनचंदा
वक1 ला
ितyवनंतपुरम
केरल 695,141
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
20
6400023593
31.07.2015
िHशूर Iवेलस1
एपी .XII-324, आलुRमुडू
कयापुरम पीओ
ितyवनंतपुरम
केरल 695,301
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
21
6400023694
31.07.2015
जॉयीआलुpास इंिडया ाइवेट िलिमटेड
मेयीन रोड, अंगमाली
एना1कुलम
केरल 683572
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
22
6400023997
06.08.2015
मलबार गोड एंड डायमंuस
डोर नंबर .XX / 441 / 1,2 संकर अयर
जं-शन एम जी रोड
िHशूर
केरल 680004
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
23
6400024090
06.08.2015
पुथोर फैशन Iवैलस1
छठी / 416.यू.वी. कलरpल शॉ@पग स$टर
टेRपल रोड
िपरायर पीओ ना3टpा
िHशूर
केरल 680566
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
4284
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
24
6400024292
10.08.2015
िनचु गोड
10/210 ई, ओ पी पी: उyवाचल, मेिडकल
8,10 युyवाचल पीओ
क|ूर
केरल 670702
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
25
6400024393
10.08.2015
पािलथारा Iवेलस1
मा3रना शॉ@पग स$टर नेशनल हाईवे
थिलपाराRबा पीओ
क|ूर
केरल 670141
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
26
6400024595
06.08.2015
कैराली Iवेलस1
केराली ऑिडटो3रयम वक1ला
ितyवनंतपुरम
केरल 695141
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
27
6400024696
10.08.2015
मलबार ऑण1मेटस ाइवेट िलिमटेड
43/1095 ए, बी, ए वी के नायर रोड
तथाशेरी
क|ूर
केरल 670,101
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
28
6400024797
10.08.2015
3रदान गोड
टेके शॉ@पग कॉR6ले-स वीपी 5/539 बी,
वज़खाट पीओ,
मल6पुरम
केरल 673604
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
29
6400024898
10.08.2015
यू अरबी गोड पाक1
डोर नं .VIII / 1523 बै पास जं-शन,
कोडोटी,मल6पुरम
केरल 673,638
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
30
6400024999
10.08.2015
आलाpािपलल Iवैलस1
आलाpािपलल काँम6ले-स 318A,
आम`बालूर ,काि5रामंटं
एना1कुलम
केरल 682 315
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
31
6400025092
10.08.2015
दीया गोड पेरंzा
yम नं .8 / 761,762 पेरंzा
पेरंzा पी ओ, कोिशकोड
केरल 673 525
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
32
6400025193
10.08.2015
िचरंकुिजयील Iवैलस1
पी पी ए-स 477, पेयावुर पीओ
क|ूर
केरल 670,633
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
33
6400026094
17.08.2015
चेममानूर गोड पालेस इंटरनेशनल
िलिमटेड
के पी ए-स / 335 एस, 335 डी, डी 1,
डी 2, डी 4,335 ई-एच, पुिलpल
िब@डग चेनटैटमेटं जं-शन, कट6पना
इडुp
केरल 685,508
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940
4285
34
6400026195
17.08.2015
अलुpास Iवेलरी
एम ओ रोड िHशूर
िHशूर
केरल 680001
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
35
6400026296
17.08.2015
दुबई गोड
बी: नं: 9/1611 टी ओ 9/1619 सी3ट
माक1 ओ पो सरकार अ%पताल प}ंबी रोड,
चेy6पुलाशेरी
पलाpड़
केरल 679,503
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
36
6400026397
18.08.2015
िचलंगा Iवेलस1
डोर सं .12 / 997.जी बी रोड
पालाpाड़
केरल 678,001
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
37
6400026498
18.08.2015
लxमी Iवेलरी
डोर सं .15/964 कोट1 रोड
आलथूर पीओ
पालाpाड़
केरल 678541
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
38
6400026599
18.08.2015
भारगावी गोड स$टर
डोर सं VII / 647, कालटीpोट
पालाpाड़
केरल 678,596
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
39
6400026704
04.09.2015
िभमा Iवेस ए युिणट ओफ बुटीक ाइवेट
िलिमटेड
डोर नं .34/40ए, बाई पास रोड,
इडा6पली, कोचीन
एना1कुलम
कोि
केरल 682,024
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
40
6400026805
07.09.2015
अमाना गोड
डोर नं.XVI / 650 पूवातानी रोड
कtर-लाथानी तpनतुरा चाइथलोर पीओ
पलpड़
केरल 678609
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
41
6400026906
07.09.2015
ए पी एस Iवेलरी
टी सी 8/1624, िथyमाला पी ओ,
िथyमाला
ितyवनंतपुरम
केरल 695,006
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
42
6400027096
07.09.2015
यू सोनास Iवैलरी
पुि|लाथ इzािहमकु}ी
मेमो3रयल शॉ@पग कॉR6ले-स, VII /
165बी, यू बज़ार जंगषन ए3रयाद VII,
ए3रयाड पीओ
िHशूर
केरल 680,666
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
4286
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
43
6400027197
07.09.2015
इशान जुवस पालस एल एल पी
%टडीम िब@डग, 18/53 डी,
ई कोईलाडी-18
कोईलाडी पी ओ
कोज़ीकोड
केरल 673,305
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
44
6400027298
07.09.2015
इ%हा गोड ऑगस एलएलपी
स$टरी कॉR6ले-स, बीपी 4/978
एम एन पी, मुCय सड़क बाशरी 7,
बेलुस1री पीओ
कोज़ीकोड
केरल 673,612
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
45
6400027399
07.09.2015
ज़ैम जैम Iवेलस1
डोर नं .15 / 723, पीटी वािणिIयक
भवन, तािजpोड पीओ,
करीगलतानी
मल6पुरम
केरल 679,322
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
46
6400027403
07.09.2015
वैसाली Iवेलस1
प}ंबी रोड, इडा6पाल
मल6पुरम
केरल 679,576
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
47
6400027605
09.09.2015
िमलन गोड एंड डायमंuस
1 9/115 ए 28, 29, 30, 31 ए 28 टी
ओ 31 3ागोड पंचायत, 19,
अलातीयूर
मल6पुरम
केरल 676,102
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
48
6400027706
09.09.2015
ले-शमी Iवेलस1
इटा6पोन, आयारािन-कुडी
कोज़ीकोड
केरल 690,558
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
49
6400027807
09.09.2015
मेलेपाट गोड
XIV / 482, मीनगढ़ी-wामा पंचायत
मेनागढ़ी पीओ
वायानाड
केरल 673,591
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
50
6400027908
09.09.2015
इडीयाड गोड
डोर एन पी 11/945, IX / 581 (ओड)
नेिडयनाट िब@डग, ना3रकुिन पीओ।
कोज़ीकोड
wाउंड 673,585
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
51
6400028098
09.09.2015
दीपा %वण1
डोर नं 111/505 (ओड) डोर नं.11/1
(नया) Rयूिनिसपल कॉR6ले-स
कासरगोड
केरल 671,121
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940
4287
52
6400028506
21.092015
यू िब%मी फैशन Iवेलरी
िब%मी 6लाजा, बीपी 111/1628 मेयीन
रोड बलरामपुरम पीओ
ितyवनंतपुरम
केरल 695,501
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
53
6400028607
21.09.2015
मुंडाEु फैशन Iवेलरी
XIII / 220 टेRपलेट पॉइंट वानपुरम
इडुp
केरल 685,607
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
54
6400028708
21.09.2015
कैराली Iवेलस1
एन एच -47, िHव$म रोड कलमंबलम
ितyवनंतपुरम
केरल 695,605
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
55
6400028809
21.09.2015
कृTण Iवेलस1
लेयोला रोड, Mीका3रयम
ितyवनंतपुरम
केरल 695,017
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
56
6400028910
21.09.2015
िनिथन िसवर पालस
टी बी जं-शन, मुवाEुपुजा
एना1कुलम
केरल 686,661
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
57
6400029003
22.09.2015
मैनजली Iवेलस1
10 / 1268-123 िनयर यू चच1,
िHशूर
केरल 680,001
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
58
6400029407
01.10.2015
पुणिथल Iवेलरी
डोर नं.IV / 554 (ओएलड), IV/ 444
(यू) ओ पी पी.पो%ट काया1लय मुCय
रोड, पूरीपाली पीओ
वायनाड
केरल 673,579
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
59
6400029508
01.10.2015
मािलकास Iवेलरी
च$ डम रोड वेल$कोडे पीओ
मल6पुरम
केरल 679,579
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
60
6400029609
01.10.2015
यू पािवजं Iवेलरी
XIV / 432आर िनयर वडाकंचरी बस %टेट
शहर टॉवर िब@डग मुCय सड़क िHशूर
िHशूर
केरल 680,582
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
61
6400029710
01.10.2015
जे जे गोड
XXVII / 569, ए एम रोड कोथममंगलम
एना1कुलम
केरल 686,691
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
4288
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
62
6400029811
01.10.2015
पैरापटू Iयूवेलस1
दरवाजा सं। बारहवY / 461
केवी.केकेकेटीयू कॉR6ले-स ओपीपी। %वण1थु
बस %टjड काबलाम पीओ
एना1कुलम
केरला-683562
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
63
6400029912
01.10.2015
वेलयुधन संनस Iवेलरी
डोर नं. पी.पी 7/15 मेयीन रोड रामपुरम
पी ओ
अंगादपुरम (वाया)
मल6पुरम
केरला-679321
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
64
6400030085
01.10.2015
के.वी Iवैलस1
डोर नं ए पी -14 / 916, एपी 8/718
(ओड) मेयीन रोड अंगादपुरम (वाया)
मल6पुरम
केरल 679,321
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
65
6400030388
14.10.2015
कमाली डायमंड एंड गोड एल एल पी
िवजया िबडYग,29/866 बी मावूर रोड
कोज़ीpोड
केरला- 673 016
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
66
6400030489
14.10.2015
वाज़मटिEल Iवैलस1
yम नं / 45 कॉR6ले-स पास करतु
कु3रशु िपरावम- मुवाEुपुज़ रोड, िपरावम
एना1कुलम
केरल 686,664
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
67
6400030792
22.10.2015
zदस1 Iवैलस1
डोर नं. XIII/521(ओड),XII/546(यू)
काचेरी जंगषन,अRबलापुTजा
आला6पुज़ा
केरल- 688561
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
68
6400030893
22.10.2015
इलाEूर Iवैलस1
Mी नारायण िबडYग yम नं नंबर 2/261
िनयर %टेट बjक ओफ इडीया इलाEुर
कोषीpोड
केरला- 673 303
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
69
6400031087
28.10.2015
बीसिमला Iवैलस1
िबडYग नं के पी 3/572
कुलाEु6पुIहा पी ओ
कोलम
केरला- 691317
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
70
6400031188
28.10.2015
परावती Iवेलरी
टी.सी. 38/1716, (ओएलडी 45/1082)
चालाई बाजरा, चाला पीओ
ितyवनंतपुरम
केरला- 695036
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940
4289
71
6400031289
28.10.2015
यू कनाकमहाल Iवेलरी
डोर नं 1/151/152,मुpम wाम पंजायत
कािलpट रोड,मुpम पी ओ
कोिषpोट
केरल - 673602
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
72
6400031390
28.10.2015
पािवIहं Iवेलरी
िबडYग नं .VII/168
मुनिस6पाल िबडYग
पुनालूर
कोलम
केरल- 691 305
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
73
6400031491
28.10.2015
के आर एस गोड Iवैलस1
डोर नं III/767 ओपोिसट बस %टjड
चेy6पुलाशेरी पी ओ
पालाpाट
केरल - 679 503
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
74
6400031592
28.10.2015
जनता फाशन Iवैलस1
एस बी टी िबडYग मेयीन रोड
वडाpानचेरी
Hीशूर
केरल - 680 582
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
75
6400031592
28.10.2015
जनता फाशन गोड सु6पर माक1ट
1/565 सी टी िल}ील वर कोणवेट
जंगशन
मेयीन रोट,चेलpरा
Hीशूर
केरल- 680 586
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
76
6400031794
28.10.2015
जनता फाशन Iवैलस1
तोफp िबडYग ओटु6पारा
10/1065,1066
Hीशूर
केरल- 680 582
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
77
6400031895
28.10.2015
वनीता Iवेलरी
चावpाट
Hीशूर
केरल- 680506
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
78
6400031996
28.10.2015
Iवल सी3ट
डोर नंबर 730 ए कुडुकटवू रोड
पु|ायूरकुलम
िHशूर
केरल-679 561
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
79
6400032089
28.10.2015
शािलमार Iवेलरी
XIV/560 आलEरा सेटर
िHशूर
केरल- 679561
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
80
6400032190
28.10.2015
चैतया Iवेलरी
वेलीयनकोट पो|ानी
मला6पुरम
केरल - 679 579
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
4290
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
81
6400032291
28.10.2015
अरामना गोड ए{ड डायमंडस
VII/220,िचटुवा रोड,चावpाट पी ओ
िHशूर
केरल - 680506
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
82
6400032392
28.10.2015
बी गोड
के एम सी IV/162 ए,21िनयर यू बस
%टेट
कासरागोट
केरल- 671121
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
83
6400032897
30.10.2015
वनाता Iवेलरी
आलाा पु|यूरकुलम
िHशूर
केरल - 679 561
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
84
6400032998
30.10.2015
गीता Iवेलरी
डोर नं एम पी VI 417 मैसूर रोड
मानंतावाडी पी ओ
वायनाड
केरल 670645
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
85
6400033091
30.10.2015
चे|लूर Iवेलरी
ओ पी II/591,िनयर चे|लूर फाशन
मारि`बलस
ओिरा
कोलम
केरल- 690419
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
86
6400033192
30.10.2015
सलाला गड ए{ड डायमंडस
वी पी 9/356,इलाRमरामं रोड,
इडाXव{णा6पारा
मला6पुरम
केरल- 673 645
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
87
6400033293
30.10.2015
नवारा Iवैलस1
िबडYग नंबर एम पी VII-351 ए स (1)
टेpान कॉR6ले-स िनयर बस %टjड, मैयीन
क{णूर
केरल- 670602
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
88
6400033697
06.11.2015
मुबारक फाशन गोड
डोर नंबर 6/113सी, कु|ुम6पुरम
कुटुर नोथ1 पी ओ
मला6पुरम
केरल - 676305
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
89
6400033798
06.11.2015
सानीला Iवेलरी
44/1706,07,08,मेयीन रोड, तलाशेरी
क{णूर
केरल- 670101
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
90
6400033899
06.11.2015
हैमा फाशन Iवेलरी
मला6पुरम पी ओ
एना1कुलम
केरल- 682 511
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
91
6400033903
06.11.2015
कारतीका Iवेलरी
डोर नं 13/486 (ओड 790/3)
तेकेनटा
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
आई एस
1417:2016
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940
4291
कोटुगलूर
िHशूर
केरल- 680664
एवं मुहरांकन
92
6400034093
06.11.2015
के पी वाक Iवेलरी
डोर नं (यू 23/783/784) (ओड नं.
1159)
गोड सू6पर माक1ट,तोडु6पुज़ा
ओ6पो, Iयोदी सु6पर माक1ट,
इडुp
केरल-685 584
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
93
6400034194
06.11.2015
के पी वाक Iवेलरी
िबडYग नंबर 2/1244 गोड सुपर माक1ट
बस %टjड रोड कट6पना
इडुp
केरल - 685 508
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
94
6400034295
06.11.2015
के पी वाक Iवेलरी
गोड माक1ट,
िनयर लूक आई आ%पताल ए एम रोड,
पेyबावूर
एरणाकुलम
केरल- 683 542
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
95
6400034699
23.11.2015
सुव1णा Iवेलरी
कुलाEु6पुIहा,िबडYग नं के पी III/570
कोलम
केरल- 691310
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
96
6400034703
23.11.2015
जसीना Iवेलरी
के पी 1/832 िनयर जी वी एच एस एस
कलरा,
कलरा पी ओ
ितyवनंतापुरम
केरल 695 608
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
97
6400034804
23.11.2015
मूSत गोड हाऊस
िबडYग नं VIII/494 मेयीन रोड िचरा6पु
िHशूर
केरल-680 561
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
98
6400034905
23.11.2015
अpरा Iवेलरी
मेयीन कु3रयाीरा
िHशूर
केरल- 680006
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
99
6400035095
23.11.2015
िवनायका Iवेलरी
बी%मी कॉR6ले-स(ओड नं II/1655, यू
XVII/506)
मेयीन रोड, पतना6पुरम
को}यम
केरल- 689 695
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
100
6400035604
10.12.2015
अराफ़ा गोड
िनयर जुमा मि%जद चाला
ितyवनंतापुरम
केरल- 695 036
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
4292
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
101
6400035705
10.12.2015
िचHा गोड पालस
काटाpटा
ितyवनंतापुरम
केरल- 695572
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
102
6400035806
10.12.2015
ए आर Iवेलरी
तेियिलpल
डोर नं एन पी V/250 ए{ड 251
तेयाला, ितyराङडी
मला6पुरम
केरल- 676320
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
103
6400035907
10.12.2015
नासको गोड सूक
नाज टवर ,माक1ट जंगशन
को}ारpरा पी ओ
कोलम
केरल- 691506
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
104
6400036097
10.12.2015
पीयरल गोलट महाल
डोर नं िव पी XIV/1479,गोपीकृTण
िबडYग
मेयीन, बटाpानचेरी
पालpाट
केरल- 678683
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
105
6400036198
10.12.2015
आलुpास Iवेलरी
डोर 1255/2,1255/3,जोस आलुpास
िबडYग,आलुpास Iवेलरी
आर एस रोड
पालpाट
केरल - 678 001
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
106
6400036299
10.12.2015
ए स बी सीलवर
11-1703(29) टी बी रोड फाईन सेटर
िसटी-1
पालाpाट
केरल - 678001
चांदी और चांदी
िमM धातु आभूषण/
कलाकृितय
उ*कृता और अंकन
आई एस
2112:2014
107
6400036303
10.12.2015
वडाय|ूर गोड
डोर नं िनल 458 राजा रोड
3रलेर पी ओ
कासरागोड
केरल- 671314
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
108
6400036404
10.12.2015
टी एम एस एटराईसस1
1 %ट,ोर XLI/115, 116 मलाबार
कॉR6ले-स
जी बी रोड
पालpाट
केरल- 678 001
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
109
6400036505
10.12.2015
सुपरणा1 Iवेलरी
डोर नं 11/31,को}6पुरम,पे}ोल
िनलेशवर
कासरागोट
केरल- 671314
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
110
6400036606
10.12.2015
कृTणा फाषन Iवेलरी
डोर नं 9/11,चेरEला पी ओ
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
आई एस
1417:2016
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940
4293
आला6पIहा
केरल- 688 524
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
111
6400036707
10.12.2015
पािवHं Iवैलस1
V/189,पेयाट पी ओ
ितyवनंतपुरम
केरल- 695 573
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
112
6400036808
10.12.2015
िवजीएबीएम गोड िलिमटेड लैिबलीटी
पाट1नर टी िशप
VII/598 एफ, ओपो बस %टाट वेङरा
मला6पुरम
केरल- 676304
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
113
6400036909
10.12.2015
सुमागली Iवैलस1
डोर नं XV/693/1 तैpाट जंगषन
गुyवायूर
िHशूर
केरल - 680 104
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
114
6400037204
21.12.2015
सुरफ Iवैलस1
हो%पीटल रोड,कोटुङलूर
िHशूर
केरल - 680664
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
115
6400037305
21.12.2015
अदहार गोड पेयाzा एल एल पी
डोर नं 12/1309-1315, वडाpङडी
िबडYग,
कालीpट रोड,पेरंzा
कोिशpोट
केरल- 673 525
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
116
6400037406
22.12.2015
पीरामेल पािवIहं Iवेलरी
ओनतुyE पी ओ वैिपन
एरणाकुलम
केरल- 682508
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
117
6400037507
22.12.2015
डीवीन गोड
कालीpट इनpाईव,1%ट ोर 5/3129 बी
5,बी 6
यू के एस रोड
कोषीpोट
केरल- 673001
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
118
6400038004
13.01.2016
कािवता गोड ए{ड डायीमेट
डोर नं XVI/283 टू 294, कालीpट रोड
वेलानचेरी,मला6पुरम
केरल- 676552
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
119
6400038105
13.01.2016
अनुमोद फाषन जुवस
डोर नं XVI/283 टू 294,कालीकट रोड
वेलाचेरी
मला6पुरम
केरल-676 552
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
4294
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
120
6400038206
13.01.2016
िमना Iवेलरी
डोर नं.6/416,ओड मैसूर रोड
मानदवाडी पी ओ
वायनाट
केरल- 670645
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
121
6400038307
13.01.2016
तकस Iवेलरी
डोर नं VIII/580.ितyव|ा पी ओ
ितyव|ा,वयानाड
केरल- 670645
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
122
6400038408
13.01.2016
मलाबार फाषन Iवेलरी
डोर नं VIII/395बी,पटी5ारीEरा पी ओ
मानतावीडी
केरल- 673 575
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
123
6400038509
13.01.2016
अफसल गोड सुक
डोर नं X/1256ई,िनयर vापार भवन
बटीयाटका रोट
कुRबलारोड पी ओ
कोसरगोड
केरल- 671 321
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
124
6400038610
13.01.2016
एन जी डी जुवस
yम नं III/872 बी सी Hीशूर रोड
वैलानचेरी,मल6पुराम
केरल- 676552
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
125
6400038711
13.01.2016
िज़या गोड
अpरामाल, कॉR6ले-स
593-ओ,593-एन,कुyबEूर के पी IV
ताली6परा`बा
क{णूर
केरल- 670142
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
126
6400038812
13.01.2016
पुTपलता Iवेलरी
VII/271,माक1ट रोड VII,उ*मा पी ओ
कासरागोड
केरल 671319
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
127
6400038905
13.01.2016
धया Iवेलरी
डोर नं .XIV/16,पुEेन6पली
अीpोट,कोडुङलूर
Hीशूर
केरल- 680666
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
128
6400039006
13.01.2016
िवकिलयामान Iवेलस1
ए पी /ए-स / 5, कोलम, चेनकोटा रोड,
कज़थुyटी पीओ
कोलम
केरल 691,309
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
129
6400039107
13.01.2016
मोिथरवली Iवेलरी
िनयर सरकार हॉि%पटल रोड, पाव:र
पीओ
क{णूर
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940
4295
केरल 670673
130
6400039208
13.01.2016
कोलातुकुडी Iवेलरी
डूर नं . 391/11, मनजपरा पीओ
एना1कुलम
केरल 683581
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
131
6400039309
13.01.2016
राजकुमारी गोड सूक और सुपर माकट
िब@डग नं.एन पी .14 / 723 मेयीन रोड
कलामांबलम पीओ
ितyवनंतपुरम
केरल- 695605
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
132
6400039511
14.01.2016
म%कैट Iवैलरी
डूर नं .17/306, कुEु6पराब1
क{णूर
केरल- 670643
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
133
6400039612
22.01.2016
यू िचलका जुवस
VII / 758, रेलवे %टेशन रोड, अलुवा
एना1कुलम
केरल- 683101
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
134
6400039705
22.01.2016
^%टल जुवस
टी.सी.38/1222(14), वलायल चे}ी
%ीट,
चालै पी ओ
ितyवनंतपुरम
केरल- 695036
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
135
6400039806
22.01.2016
थैचपाली Iवेलरी
पलुyथी, कोी
एना1कुलम
केरल- 682006
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
136
6400039907
22.01.2016
शादी गोड और डायमंuस
10/545, नदुव|ूर पी ओ
कोिझकोड
केरल- 673614
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
137
6400040088
22.01.2016
पलाही जेवेलेस1
वैTणवम िब@डग 45(यू330)
इज़हीकाकाटG जन.ह3रपाद,ह3रपादII
(यूIX)
अल6पुज़हा
केरला-690514
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
138
6400040189
22.10.2016
ऑफ़लjड गोड और डायमंuस
डोर नं। 9/314 ए, 314 बी, ऑफ़लjड
आकड,
अथानी, एथोली
कोिझकोड
केरल- 673315
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
139
6400040290
22.10.2016
लxमी Iवेलरी
िब@डग नो-XIII / 544 ए, कोडुंगलूर,
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
आई एस
1417:2016
4296
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
िHशूर
केरल 680,664
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
140
6400040391
22.01.2016
संगीता फैशन Iवेलरी
डूर नं. टी पी /11/77(ओड),IV/95( यू),
अचायूमूड, पे3रनाड पीओ
कोलम
केरल 691,601
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
141
6400040492
22.01.2016
संगीता आभूषण
अचायूमूड , पे3रनाड पीओ
कोलम
केरल 691,601
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
142
6400040593
22.01.2016
zादर Iवेलरी
वाड1 नं .1 / 375, मंगलम पीओ,
ीकुनुनपुझा
आल6पुIहा
केरल 690,515
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
143
6400040694
22.01.2016
फरदौस गोड पटाबी एलएलपी
डोर नं .XII / 316-385 दुबई गोड ए{ड
डायमंuस, पे3रनथलम|ा रोड, प}ंबी
पलpड़
केरल 679,303
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
144
6400040795
22.01.2016
फरदौस गोड वैल$चेरी एलएलपी
वी पी 11/1003 जीएच, आईएसटी ए{ड
िBतीय ोर, कतर 6लाजा, वलंचरी
मल6पुरम
केरल 676,552
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
145
6400040896
22.01.2016
फरदौस %वण1 रामनEुpरा एलएलपी
कलकpन िब@डग, 700-ए ए{ड 700-बी,
बस %टjड, कैिलकट रोड, रमनतुpरा
कोिझकोड
केरल 673,633
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
146
6400041292
02.02.2016
थारकंस सुइस Iवेलरी
चावpड़
िHशूर
केरल 680,506
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
147
6400041393
02.02.2016
अनुwा Iवेलरी
को}पादी रोड, पैरा, पीओ पेy`बाडा6पा
मल6पुरम
केरल 679,580
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
148
6400041494
02.02.2016
कनकम Iवेलरी
बस %टड जंकशन, चावpड़
िHशूर
केरल- 680506
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
149
6400041595
02.02.2016
टी टी Iवेलरी
इ|मावू रोड, चावpड़
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
आई एस
1417:2016
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940
4297
िHशूर
केरल- 680506
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
150
6400041696
02.02.2016
वरनाम Iवैलरी
पुथानपली, पेy`बाडा6पा
मल6पुरम
केरल 679580
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
151
6400041797
02.02.2016
थारकन Iवेलरी
डूर नं VII / 150 जी, चावpड़
िHशूर
केरल 680506
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
152
6400041898
02.02.2016
ए पी.बालकृTणिपलै
13/250, पलायम रोड
कोजिहकोडे
केरला-673001
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
153
6400041999
02.02.2016
Mीxमी गोड एंड डायमंuस
रेलवे %टेशन रोड
माही
पोडीचेरी- 673310
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
154
6400042092
02.02.2016
Mीवलसं गोड एंड डायमंuस ाइवेट
िलिमटेड
राज%वम िब@डग 571 / ए, बस %टjड
कोनी, पथानामिथ}ा मेयीन रोड
पथानामिथ}ा
केरल 689,513
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
155
6400042193
02.02.2016
फरदौस %वण1 चेRमाट ाईवेट िलिमटेड
(दुबई गोड और डायमंuस), टीपीवी /
851,859, मुCय सड़क चेRमाद, ितyरगढ़ी
पीओ
मला6पुरम
केरल 676,306
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
156
6400042799
09.02.2016
फरदौस गहने और हीरे ाइवेट िलिमटेड
21/621, डी, ई, एफ, जी, स$ल टॉवर,
डाउनिहल
मल6पुरम
केरल 676,519
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
157
6400042803
09.02.2016
%वणजली गोड पाक1
दरवाजा सं .XIII / 88-4,5 और 6,
कापेटा Rयूिनिसपिलटी
वायनाड
केरल 673,121
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
158
6400042904
09.02.2016
%वमवरा Iवेलस1
ए-स / 532 एफ, मालीकाRपेदीका,
अलागढ़ पीओ, अलुवा
एना1कुलम
केरल- 683511
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
4298
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
159
6400043094
09.02.2016
%काई गोड
yम नं पीएमसी VI / 285, ओ पी पी
नाशनल कॉलेज, पेy`बा, पेयानूर पीओ
क{णूर
केरल- 670307
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
160
6400043195
09.02.2016
%काई गोड
yम नं केसीपी XIII, 1604 ए,
कज़हर चावशेरी पंचायत,
मेयीन रोड,ई3रटी
क{णूर
केरल- 670703
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
161
6400043296
09.02.2016
%वपन फैशन Iवेलरी
नीyगल (िब@डग), एस। कोलमाशेरी
एना1कुलम
केरल- 602033
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
162
6400043397
09.02.2016
कोइकल Iवेलस1
32/73, पाक1 जं-शन, कायमुकलम
आल6पुIहा
केरल 690,502
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
163
6400043498
09.02.2016
डेज़ डायमंuस िलिमटेड
पाथयापुरा िब@डग, राउंड साउथ
िHशूर
केरल- 680001
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
164
6400043599
09.02.2016
कोइकल Iवेलस1
एच पी 8/509, मुCय सड़क ह3रपपद
आल6पुIहा
केरल- 690514
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
165
6400043906
08.02.2016
कुRबुpाल फाषन Iवेलस1
वाTज़ूर पीओ
को}ायम
केरल- 686504
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
166
6400044096
18.02.2016
िनवेदयम Iवेलस1
711/399/400, मालाइंकज़ू पीओ
ितyवनंतपुरम
केरल- 695571
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
167
640004419
18.02.2016
अरबीयन Iवेलस1
एन एच रोड, कyनाग6पली
कोलम
केरल- 691001
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
168
6400044208
18.02.2016
मेो गोड एंड डायमंuस
4/93 (4/1533), पुलु6लमम रोड,
फोट1कोी पी ओ
कु|ु6पुरम
एना1कुलम
केरल- 682001
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
169
6400044399
18.02.2016
अरबी Iवेलस1
कुRपाहा रोड
पथानामिथ}ा
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
आई एस
1417:2016
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940
4299
केरल- 689645
एवं मुहरांकन
170
6400044403
18.02.2016
िवजयककृTण गोड
चामंगलम, कोटकरकर
कोलम
केरल 691,534
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
171
6400044807
25.02.2016
चेममानूर गोड पालेस इंटरनेशनल
िलिमटेड
बॉबी चेमैनूर माSजन मुत िमनी Iवैलस1
वेटूर आरकेट के एस आर टी सी बस %टjड,
मेयीन सेील बोड1
एटुमानूर
को}यम
केरल- 686631
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
172
6400045098
03.03.2016
हाईनस Iवेलरी
XX/ 1080-1081, रेषमा िब@डग,
तेजहेपालम, ितyर
मल6पुरम
केरल 676,101
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
173
6400045199
03.03.2016
राजधानी जेवेलेस1
डोर नं.टी.एम 20/1140-41, थैहेपालम,
ितfर
मल6पुरम
केरला-676101
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
174
6400045203
03.03.2016
मुगल Iवेलस1
परापणगढ़ी रोड, तनूर
मल6पुरम
केरल- 676302
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
175
6400045304
03.03.2016
अमाडेना Iवेलरी
11/530 जी, आलिEयूर पीओ, ितyर
मल6पुरम
केरल 676,102
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
176
6400045406
03.03.2016
अजेथा Iवेलस1
बी नं.VI/434 ,ियापुरम, पो%ट पंचािH,
ितyर
मल6पुरम
केरल 676,105
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
177
6400045506
03.03.2016
सुधा गोड
डूर नं .10 / 293, सी3ट पाक1 सेर,
एज़हर रोड, ितyर
मल6पुरम
केरल 676 101
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
178
6400045607
03.03.2016
अमृथा गोड एंड डायमंड
अमृत िब@डग, 14/158,
CHETTPPADI, 14।
मल6पुरम
केरल 676,319
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
4300
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
179
6400046609
03.03.2016
ताजमहल गोड सुपरमाकट ाईवेट
िलिमटेड
डोर नं IV / 380 पास पो%ट ऑफस,
मेलतूर
मल6पुरम
केरल 679,326
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
180
6400045809
04.03.2016
अराब गोड एंड डायमंuस ाइवेट
िलिमटेड
एस पी XIX / 1365,1366,1367, अडूर,
भरिणकावू, स%तमकोटा पीओ
कोलम
केरल 690,521
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
181
6400045910
04.03.2016
काला Iवेलरी
अलाथा, पुयोरकुलम
िHशूर
केरल 679,561
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
182
6400046003
04.03.2016
कोियलाट गोड और डायमंuस
टी पी 11/413 और 414 ओपो िवलेज
काया1लय काचेरी, परमबथ थलकुलतूर
कोिझकोड
केरल 673,317
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
183
6400046104
04.03.2016
अिलना Iवेलरी
कुyपली जयंती वाधुथला, िचEूर रोड,
कोची
एना1कुलम
केरल 682,023
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
184
6400046205
04.03.2016
फैजल Iवेलस1
इज़हर रोड, ितyर
मल6पुरम
केरल 676,101
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
185
6400046306
04.03.2016
%वारना Iवेलरी
3 / 953-2 भारत के राIय बjक, िसिवल
लैन रोड, वजाpला, िHककार पीओओ
एना1कुलम
केरल 682,021
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
186
6400046407
04.03.2016
Mी कृTण गोड और डायमंuस
yम नं 6 टी डी बी िब@डग, ए सी रोड,
चेरथला
आल6पुIहा
केरल 688,524
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
187
6400046508
04.03.2016
मािनwाम Iवेलरी
ओयूर
कोलम
केरल 691,510
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
188
6400046710
10.03.2016
फाितमा गोड एंड डायमंड
िब@डग नं .7 / 101 बी, कोलाथुर,
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
आई एस
1417:2016
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940
4301
कुyपित, मोरpन पंचायत
मल6पुरम
केरल 679,338
एवं मुहरांकन
189
6400046811
10.03.2016
नावीन Iवेलरी
िब@डग नं XIII / 273, पाRपाकुडा पीओ
एना1कुलम
केरल 686,667
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
190
6400046912
15.03.2016
%वैपना Iवेलरी
िवझुर पीओ, इडायहं
को}यम
केरल 686,144
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
191
6400047005
15.03.2016
एम एस गोड $ डायमंuस
थवाpल कॉR6ले-स-इ3रटी केसीपी XIII /
1613 ए 27-32 ए 48-51463, ए 64,
इ3रटी
क{णूर
केरल 670,703
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
192
6400047106
15.03.2016
सौRया Iवैलरी
पीपी 12/582, ओपो संकर ि-लिनक,
पेरंzा पीओ
कोिझकोड
केरल 673,525
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
193
6400047207
15.03.2016
कृTणा गोड सॉक
कु3}पुरम रोड, वैलंचेरी
मल6पुरम
केरल 676,552
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
194
6400047308
15.03.2016
आरच1ना Iवेलरी
मेियन रोड
कोलम
केरल 691,001
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
195
6400047409
15.03.2016
बीमा Iवेलरी
आयूर, आयूर पीओ
कोलम
केरल 691,533
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
196
6400047510
15.03.2016
एनटीएम Iवेलरी
20/123, पांिडpड़ रोड, मंजेरी
मल6पुरम
केरल -676121
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
197
6400047611
15.03.2016
दकदीद Iवेलरी
इजहावसमजं िब@डग, च$डमंगलम
जं-शन, एन परावूर
एना1कुलम
केरल 683513
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
198
6400047712
15.03.2016
चुगत गोड ए{ड डायमंuस
चुंगथ िब@डग मेयीन रोड, इtरजलाकुडा
िHशूर
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
आई एस
1417:2016
4302
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
[सं. के ीय माणन िवभाग/13 : 13]
के. कदरवेल, वै5ािनक ‘एफ’ एवं मुख
MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION
(Department of Consumer Affairs)
(BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS)
(KOCHI BRANCH)
Kochi, the 12th June, 2018
S.O. 971.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (5) of the regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards
(Certification) Regulation 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars of
which are given in the following schedule:
केरल 680125
एवं मुहरांकन
199
6400048007
18.03.2016
दी6थी Iवेलरी
XII/ 409, सेल जे-शन, राजकुमारी
पीओ, राजकुमारी
इडुp
केरल 685619
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
200
6400048108
18.03.2016
महार गोड स$टर
हाई%कूल रोड, िानोज़े पीओ,
अलाथीयूर
मल6पुरम
केरल 676,102
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
201
6400048310
22.03.2016
अल फाड1न Iवेलस1
मुCय सड़क, कोडुवली
कोिझकोड
केरल 673,572
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
202
6400048411
28.03.2016
एटलस गोड इंटरनेशनल
पेयानुर मॉल, जी ओ वी टी हॉि%पटल
रोड, पेयानूर
क{णूर
केरल 670,307
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
203
6400048512
28.03.2016
एजेरी पीएआई
टीसी नं .04 / 3046,3047 zॉडवे
एना1कुलम
केरल 682,031
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
204
6400048605
28.03.2016
चुंगथ गोड
चुंगथ Iवेलरी, अलुवा रोड, अगमाली
एना1कुलम
केरल 683,572
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
205
6400048706
28.03.2016
िडजाइनर Iवैलस1
पैरापंगाजी रोड, पीओ तनूर
मल6पुरम
केरल 676,302
%वण1 एवं %वण1
िमMधातुएं आभूषण/
िशपाकारी शु0ता
एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस
1417:2016
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940
4303
SCHEDULE
Licence granted during 01.07.2015 to 31.03.2016
Sl.
No.
Licence No.
Grant Date
Name & Address of the Party
(Factory)
Title of the Standard
IS No./
Part/Sec./Part
1
6400021185
02.07.2015
JASMINE JEWELLERS
VP 1/298 CHOONAD JN.
ELIPPAKULAM P.O
VALLIKUNNAM
ALAPPUZHA
KERALA- 690503
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
2
6400021589
08/07/2015
MAZRA GOLD
B.P.4/838L,NEAR REGISTRAR
OFFICE BALUSSERY
CALICUT
KOZHIKODE
KERALA-673612
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
3
6400021690
08/07/2015
ILLATHU JEWELLERY
DOOR NO 14/207 (OLD 6/846C)
THANEERMUKKOM P.O
CHERTHALA
ALAPPUZHA
KERALA-688527
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
4
6400021791
15/07/2015
ALAIKKA GOLD JEWELLERY
KARINKALLATHANI,
KANJIRAMUKKU
MALAPPURAM
KERALA- 679584
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
5
6400021892
15/07/2015
AMAR GOLD AND
DIAMONDS
SMART CENTRE BUILDING
NEAR PRIVATE BUS STAND
MALA
THRISSUR
KERALA-680732
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
6
6400021993
15/07/2015
PALATHINGAL JEWELLERY
DOOR NO.X/561
NAYARAGADY,VYLATHUR
P.O NHAMANGHAAT
THRISSUR
KERALA-679563
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
7
6400022086
20/07.2015
CHITHRA JEWELLERY
DOOR NO IV/108-A
CHANGARAMKULAM
ALANKODE P.O
MALAPPURAM
KERALA-679591
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
8
6400022187
20/07/2015
DHANALAKSHMI
JEWELLERY
T.C 37/883 RAJADHANI
BUILDING, FORT, FORT P.O
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
KERALA-695023
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
4304
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
9
6400022288
20/07/2015
BHIMA AND BROTHER
BULLION PRIVATE LIMITED
BHIMA TOWER,1526/700A
TRIVANDRUM ROAD NEAR
RAILWAY STATION,KOLLAM
KOLLAM
KERALA-691001
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
10
6400022389
20/07/2015
BHIMA AND BROTHER
BULLION PRIVATE LIMITED
BHIMA BUILDING,779-
1,NEAR KSRTC BUS STAND
PALAKKAD
KERALA-678014
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
11
6400022490
20/07/2015
BHIMA AND BROTHER
BULLION PRIVATE LIMITED
BHIMA BUILDING,779-
1,NEAR KSRTC BUS STAND
PALAKKAD
KERALA-678014
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
12
6400022591
22/07/2015
REJITH JEWELLERY
NEAR RAILWAY GATE P.P
XIV/452(OLD) P.P XVIII-
19(NEW) PAPPINISSSERI
KANNUR
KERALA-670561
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
13
6400022692
22/07/2015
STAR JEWELLERY
DOOR NO.
XI/633(NEW)VI/113(OLD)
PUNNAYOORKULAM P.O
THRISSUR
KERALA-679561
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
14
6400022793
22/07/2015
C.P.A JEWELLERY
BUILDING NO
EP5/729A(OLD),10/1039(NEW)
C.P.A JUNCTION, EDAVANNA
MALAPPURAM
KERALA-676541
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
15
6400022894
22/07/2015
PULICKENS JEWELLERY
XX-609,MAIN ROAD CHERPU,
CHERPU P.O
THRISSUR
KERALA-680561
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
16
6400022995
22/07/2015
KOCHUVEETIL LEKSHMI
JEWELLERY
BASELIOUS HOSPITAL ROAD
KOTHAMANGALAM
ERNAKULAM
KERALA-686691
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
17
6400023088
22.07.2015
SWAPNA JEWELLERS
PADA SOUTH,MAIN ROAD
KARUNAGAPPALY
KOLLAM
KERALA-690518
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
18
6400023189
22.07.2015
CHIRAKKAL GOLD
MUTTICHUKKARAN,529B
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
IS 1417 :
2016
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940
4305
CHERPU
GRAMAPANCHAYATH,XVII
CHERPU
THRISSUR
KERALA-680561
fineness and marking -
19
6400023492
24.07.2015
CHITHRA JEWELLERS
VMC 17/47 DENA COMPLEX
PUTHANCHANDHA
VARKALA
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
KERALA-695141
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
20
6400023593
31.07.2015
THRISSUR JEWELLERS
A.P.XII-324 ALUMMOODU
KANIYAPURAM P.O
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
KERALA-695301
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
21
6400023694
31.07.2015
JOYALUKKAS INDIA
PRIVATE LIMITED
MAIN ROAD,ANGAMALY
ERNAKULAM
KERALA-683572
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
22
6400023997
06.08.2015
MALABAR GOLD &
DIAMONDS
DOOR NO.XX/441/1,2
SANKARA IYYER JUNCTION
M.G ROAD
THRISSUR
KERALA-680004
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
23
6400024090
06.08.2015
PUTHOOR FASHION
JEWELLERS
VI/416.U.V KALLARAKKAL
SHOPPING CENTRE TEMPLE
ROAD THRIPRAYAR P.O
NATTIKA
THRISSUR
KERALA-680566
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
24
6400024292
10.08.2015
NICHU GOLD
10/210E,OPP:URUVACHAL,
MEDICAL8,10 URUVACHAL
P.O
KANNUR
KERALA-670702
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
25
6400024393
10.08.2015
PALLITHARA JEWELLERS
MAREENA SHOPPING
CENTRE NATIONAL
HIGHWAY THALIPARAMBA
P.O
KANNUR
KERALA-670141
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
26
6400024595
06.08.2015
KAIRALI JEWELLERS
KAIRALI AUDITORIUM
VARKALA
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
KERALA-695141
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
4306
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
27
6400024696
10.08.2015
MALABAR ORNAMENTS
PVT.LTD
43/1095A,B,A.V.K.NAIR ROAD
THALASSERY
KANNUR
KERALA-670101
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
28
6400024797
10.08.2015
RIDHAN GOLD
TEEKEY SHOPPING
COMPLEX VP5/539B,
VAZHAKKAD P.O ,
MALAPPURAM
KERALA-673604
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
29
6400024898
10.08.2015
NEW ARABIAN GOLD PARK
DOOR NO.VIII/1523 BYE PASS
JUNCTION ,KONDOTTY
MALAPPURAM
KERALA-673638
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
30
6400024999
10.08.2015
ALAKKAPPILLIL JEWELLERS
ALAKKAPPILLIL COMPLEX
318A,AMBALLOOR
KANJIRAMATTOM
ERNAKULAM
KERALA-682315
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
31
6400025092
10.08.2015
DIYA GOLD PERAMBRA
ROOM NO.8/761,762
PERAMBRA, PERAMBRA P.O
KOZHIKODE
KERALA-673525
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
32
6400025193
10.08.2015
CHEERAMKUZHIYIL
JEWELLERS
PPX/477,PAYYAVOOR P.O
KANNUR
KERALA-670633
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
33
6400026094
17.08.2015
CHEMMANUR GOLD PALACE
INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
K PX/335 S, 335 D, D1, D2, D4,
335 E-H PULICKAL BUILDING
CHENNATTUMATTOM
JUNCTION, KATTAPPANA
IDUKKI
KERALA-685508
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
34
6400026195
17.08.2015
ALUKKAS JEWELLERY
M.O ROAD THRISSUR
THRISSUR
KERALA-680001
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
35
6400026296
17.08.2015
DUBAI GOLD
B:NO:9/1611TO 9/1619
CITYMARK OPP. GOVT.
HOSPITAL PATTAMBI ROAD
CHERUPULASSERY
PALAKKAD
KERALA-679503
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
36
6400026397
18.08.2015
CHILANKA JEWELLERS
DOOR NO.12/997.G.B ROAD
PALAKKAD
PALAKKAD
KERALA-678001
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940
4307
37
6400026498
18.08.2015
LAKSHMI JEWELLERY
DOOR NO.15/964 COURT
ROAD ALATHUR,ALATHUR
P.O
PALAKKAD
KERALA-678541
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
38
6400026599
18.08.2015
BHARGAVI GOLD CENTER
DOOR NO. VII/647
KALADIKODE
PALAKKAD
KERALA-678596
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
39
6400026704
04.09.2015
BHIMA JEWELS A UNIT OF
BHIMA BOUTIQUE PVT.LTD
DOOR NO.34/40A,BYPASS
ROAD EDAPPALLY,COCHIN
ERNAKULAM
KOCHI
KERALA-682024
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
40
6400026805
07.09.2015
AMANA GOLD
DOOR NO.XVI/650
POOVATHANI ROAD
KARINKALLATHANI
TACCANATUKARA
CHETHALLOOR P.O
PALAKKAD
KERALA-678609
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
41
6400026906
07.09.2015
A P S JEWELLERY
T.C. 8/1624,THIRUMALA
P.O,THIRUMALA 695006
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
KERALA-695006
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
42
6400027096
07.09.2015
NEW SONAS JEWELLERY
PUNNILATH IBRAHIMKUTTY
MEMORIALSHOPPING
COMPLEX, VII/165B,U BAZAR
JUNCTION ERIYAD
VII,ERIYAD P.O
THRISSUR
KERALA-680666
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
43
6400027197
07.09.2015
ISHAN JEWELS PALACE LLP
STADIUM BUILDING,
18/53D,E KOYILANDY,18,
KOYILANDY P.O
KOZHIKODE
KERALA-673305
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
44
6400027298
07.09.2015
ISHA GOLD ORNAMENTS LLP
CENTURY COMPLEX, B.P
4/978 M N P,MAIN ROAD
BALUSSERY 7, BALUSSERY
P.O
KOZHIKODE
KERALA-673612
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
45
6400027399
07.09.2015
ZAM ZAM JEWELLERS
DOOR NO.15/723,PT
COMMERCIAL BUILDING,
THAZEKODE P.O
KARINKALATHANI
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
4308
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
MALAPPURAM
KERALA-679322
46
6400027403
07.09.2015
VAISALI JEWELLERS
PATTAMBI ROAD, EDAPAL
MALAPPURAM
KERALA-679576
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
47
6400027605
09.09.2015
MILAN GOLD & DIAMONDS
19/115 A28,29,30,31 A28TO31
TRIPRANGODE
PANCHAYATH, 19,
ALATHIYUR
MALAPPURAM
KERALA-676102
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
48
6400027706
09.09.2015
LEKSHMI JEWELLERS
EDAPPON,AYIRANIKUDI
ALAPPUZHA
KERALA-690558
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
49
6400027807
09.09.2015
MELEPPATTE GOLD
XIV/482,MEENANGADI-
GRAMA PANCHAYATH
MEENAGADI P.O
WAYANAD
KERALA-673591
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
50
6400027908
09.09.2015
NEDIYANAD GOLD
DOOR NO NP
11/945,IX/581(OLD)
NEDIYANAD
BUILDING,NARIKUNI P.O
KOZHIKODE
KERALA-673585
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
51
6400028098
09.09.2015
DEEPA GOLD
DOOR NO 111/505(OLD) DOOR
NO.111/1 (NEW) MUNCIPAL
COMPLEX
KASARAGOD
KERALA-671121
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
52
6400028506
21.092015
NEW BISMI FASHION
JEWELLERY
BISMI PLAZA,BP 111/1628
MAIN ROAD
BALARAMAPURAM P.O
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
KERALA-695501
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
53
6400028607
21.09.2015
MUNDATTU FASHION
JEWELLERY
XIII/220 TEMPLE POINT
VANNAPURAM
IDUKKI
KERALA-685607
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
54
6400028708
21.09.2015
KAIRALI JEWELLERS
NH-47,TRIVANDRUM ROAD
KALLAMBALAM
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
KERALA-695605
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940
4309
55
6400028809
21.09.2015
KRISHNA JEWELLER'S
LAYOLA ROAD,
SREEKARIYAM
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
KERALA-695017
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
56
6400028910
21.09.2015
NITHIN SILVER PALACE
T.B JUNCTION,
MUVATTUPUZA
ERNAKULAM
KERALA-686661
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
57
6400029003
22.09.2015
MANJALLY JEWELLERS
10/1268-123 NEAR NEW
CHURCH,THRISSUR
THRISSUR
KERALA-680001
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
58
6400029407
01.10.2015
PUNATHIL JEWELLERY
DOOR
NO.IV/554(OLD),IV/444(NEW)
OPP.POST OFFICE MAIN
ROAD,PULPALLY P.O
WAYANAD
KERALA-673579
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
59
6400029508
01.10.2015
MALLIKAS JEWELLERY
CHANGADAM ROAD
VELIANCODE P.O
MALAPPURAM
KERALA-679579
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
60
6400029609
01.10.2015
NEW PAVIZHAM JEWELLERY
XIV/432R NEAR
WADAKANCHERY BUS
STANT CITY TOWER
BUILDING MAIN ROAD
THRISSUR
KERALA-680582
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
61
6400029710
01.10.2015
J.J.GOLD
XXVII/569,A.M.ROAD
KOTHAMANGALAM
ERNAKULAM
KERALA-686691
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
62
6400029811
01.10.2015
PARAPPATTU JEWELLERS
DOOR NO. XII/461
KV.KAKKATTU COMPLEX
OPP. SWARNATHU BUS
STAND
KIZHAKABLAM P.O
ERNAKULAM
KERALA-683562
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
63
6400029912
01.10.2015
VELAYUDHAN SONS
JEWELLERY
DOOR NO. P.P 7/15 MAIN
ROAD RAMAPURAM P.O
ANGADIPURAM (VIA)
MALAPPURAM
KERALA-679321
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
64
6400030085
01.10.2015
K.V. JEWELLERS
DOOR NO. AP-14/916,A.P
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
IS 1417 :
2016
4310
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
8/718(OLD) MAIN ROAD
ANGADIPURAM (VIA)
MALAPPURAM
KERALA-679321
fineness and marking -
65
6400030388
14.10.2015
CAMMILLI DIAMOND &
GOLD LLP
VIJAYA BUILDING,29/866B
MAVOOR ROAD,
KOZHIKODE
KERALA-673016
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
66
6400030489
14.10.2015
VAZHEMADATHIL
JEWELLERS
ROOM NO. V/45 COMPLEX
NEAR KAROTTU KURISHU
PIRAVOM- MUVATTUPUZHA
ROAD PIRAVOM
ERNAKULAM
KERALA-686664
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
67
6400030792
22.10.2015
BROTHERS JEWELLERY
DOOR NO.
XIII/521(OLD),XII/546(NEW)
KACHERY JN.
AMBALAPUZHA
ALAPPUZHA
KERALA-688561
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
68
6400030893
22.10.2015
ILLATHUR JEWELLERS
SREENARAYANA BUILDING
ROOM NO. 2/261 NEAR STATE
BANK OF INDIA ELATHUR
KOZHIKODE
KERALA- 673303
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
69
6400031087
28.10.2015
BISMILLA JEWELLERY
BUILDING NO. KP3/572
KULATHUPUZHA P.O
KOLLAM
KERALA- 691317
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
70
6400031188
28.10.2015
PARVATHY JEWELLERY
T.C 38/1716,(OLD45/1082)
CHALAI BAZAAR, CHALAI
P.O
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
KERALA- 695036
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
71
6400031289
28.10.2015
NEW KANAKAMAHAL
JEWELLERY
DOOR NO 1/151,152 MUKKAM
GRAMA PANCHAYATH
CALICUT ROAD MUKKAM
P.O
KOZHIKODE
KERALA-673602
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
72
6400031390
28.10.2015
PAVIZHAM JEWELLERY
BUILDING NO.VII/168
MUNCIPAL BUILDING
PUNALUR
KOLLAM
KERALA-691305
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940
4311
73
6400031491
28.10.2015
K R S GOLD JEWELLERS
DOOR NO.III/767 OPP. BUS
STAND, CHERPULASSERY
P.O
PALAKKAD
KERALA-679503
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
74
6400031592
28.10.2015
JANATHA FASHION
JEWELLERY
S.B.T. BUILDING MAIN ROAD,
WADAKKANCHERY
THRISSUR
KERALA-680582
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
75
6400031693
28.10.2015
JANATHA JEWELLERY GOLD
SUPER MARKET
1/565 C&D,LITTLE FLOWER
CONVENT JUNCTION MAIN
ROAD CHELAKKARA
THRISSUR
KERALA-680586
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
76
6400031794
28.10.2015
JANATHA FASHION
JEWELLERY
THOUFEEQ BUILDING
OTTUPARA 10/1065,1066
THRISSUR
KERALA-680582
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
77
6400031895
28.10.2015
VANITHA JEWELLERY
CHAVAKKAD
THRISSUR
KERALA-680506
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
78
6400031996
28.10.2015
JEWEL CITY
DOOR NO. 730-A
KUNDUKADAVU ROAD
PUNNAYOORKULAM
THRISSUR
KERALA-679561
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
79
6400032089
28.10.2015
SHALIMAR JEWELLERS
XIV/560 ALTHARA CENTRE
THRISSUR
KERALA-679561
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
80
6400032190
28.10.2015
CHITHANYA JEWELLERY
VELIANCODE,PONNANI
MALAPPURAM
KERALA-679579
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
81
6400032291
28.10.2015
ARAMANA GOLD &
DIAMONDS
VII/220,CHETTUVA ROAD
CHAVAKKAD P.O
THRISSUR
KERALA-680506
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
82
6400032392
28.10.2015
B GOLD
KMC IV/162A,21 NEAR NEW
BUS STAND
KASARAGOD
KERALA-671121
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
4312
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
83
6400032897
30.10.2015
VANITHA JEWELLERY
ALTHARA,
PUNNAYURKULAM
THRISSUR
KERALA-679561
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
84
6400032998
30.10.2015
GEETHA JEWELLERY
DOOR NO.MP VI 417 MYSOOR
ROAD MANATHAVADY P.O
WAYANAD
KERALA-670645
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
85
6400033091
30.10.2015
CHENALLOOR JEWELLERS
OP II/591,NEAR CHENALLOR
FASHION MARBLES, OCHIRA
KOLLAM
KERALA-690419
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
86
6400033192
30.10.2015
SALALA GOLD & DIAMOND
V.P. 9/356,ELAMARAM
ROAD,EDAVANNAPPARA,
MALAPPURAM
KERALA-673645
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
87
6400033293
30.10.2015
NAVARATHNA JEWELLERS
BUILDING NO. MP-VII-351
AS(1) DECCAN COMPLEX
NEAR BUS STAND, MAYYIL
KANNUR
KERALA- 670602
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
88
6400033697
06.11.2015
MUBARAK FASHION GOLD
DOOR NO. 6/113C,
KUNNUMPURAM, KUTOOR
NORTH P.O
MALAPPURAM
KERALA-676305
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
89
6400033798
06.11.2015
SANILA JEWELLERY
44/1706,07,08 MAIN ROAD,
THALASSERY
KANNUR
KERALA- 670101
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
90
6400033899
06.11.2015
HYMA FASHION JEWELLERY
MALIPURAM P.O
ERNAKULAM
KERALA-682511
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
91
6400033903
06.11.2015
KARTHIKA JEWELLERY
DOOR NO. 13/486 (OLD 790/3)
THEKEANADA,
KODUNGALOOR
THRISSUR
KERALA-680664
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
92
6400034093
06.11.2015
K.P. VARKEY JEWELLERY
DOOR NO.(NEW 23/783/784)
(OLD NO. 1159) GOLD SUPER
MARKET,
THODUPUZHA,OPP.JOTHY
SUPER MARKET
IDUKKI
KERALA-685584
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940
4313
93
6400034194
06.11.2015
K.P. VARKEY JEWELLERY
BUILDING NO.2/1244 GOLD
SUPER MARKET, BUSTAND
ROAD KATTAPPANA
IDUKKI
KERALA-685508
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
94
6400034295
06.11.2015
K.P. VARKEY JEWELLERY
GOLD SUPER MARKET, NEAR
LUKE EYE HOSPITAL A.M
ROAD, PERUMBAVOOR
ERNAKULAM
KERALA-683542
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
95
6400034699
23.11.2015
SUVARNA JEWELLERY
KULATHUPUZHA,BUILDING
NO. KP III/570
KOLLAM
KERALA-691310
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
96
6400034703
23.11.2015
JASEENA JEWELLERY
KP I/832 NEAR GVHSS
KALLARA, KALLARA P.O
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
KERALA-695608
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
97
6400034804
23.11.2015
MOORTHY GOLD HOUSE
BUILDING NO.VIII/494 MAIN
ROAD CHERPU
THRISSUR
KERALA- 680561
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
98
6400034905
23.11.2015
AKKARA JEWELLERS
MAIN ROAD, KURIACHIRA
THRISSUR
KERALA-680006
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
99
6400035095
23.11.2015
VINAYAKA JEWELLERY
BISMI COMPLEX (OLD
NO.II/1655,NEW XVII/506)
MAIN ROAD,
PATHANAPURAM
KOLLAM
KERALA- 689695
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
100
6400035604
10.12.2015
ARAFA GOLD
NEAR JUMA MASJID, CHALA
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
KERALA- 695036
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
101
6400035705
10.12.2015
CHITRA GOLD PALACE
KATTAKADA
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
KERALA 695572
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
102
6400035806
10.12.2015
A.R. JEWELLERY
THEYYALINGAL, DOOR NO.
NP V/250 AND 251,
THEYYALA, THIRURANGADI
MALAPPURAM
KERALA- 676320
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
103
6400035907
10.12.2015
NAZCO GOLD SOUK
NAZ TOWER, MARKET
JUNCTION, KOTTARAKKARA
P.O
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
4314
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
KOLLAM
KOTTARAKKARA
KERALA-691506
104
6400036097
10.12.2015
PEARL GOLD MAHAL
DOOR NO. VP-
XIV/1479,GOPIKRISHNA
BUILDING MAIN ROAD,
VADAKKENCHERRY
PALAKKAD
KERALA- 678683
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
105
6400036198
10.12.2015
ALUKKAS JEWELLERY
DOOR 1255/2,1255/3, JOS
ALUKKAS
BUILDING,ALUKKAS
JEWELLERY, R.S ROAD
PALAKKAD
KERALA- 678001
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
106
6400036299 1 10.12.2015
S.B.SILVERS
11-1703(29) TB .ROAD FINE
CENTRE,CITY-1
PALAKKAD
KERALA- 678014
Silver and Silver alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 2112 :
2014
107
6400036303
10.12.2015
VADAYANDOOR GOLD
DOOR NO.NIL 458 RAJA
ROAD NILESWAR P.O
KASARAGOD
KERALA- 671314
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
108
6400036404
10.12.2015
TMS ENTERPRISES
1ST FLOOR XLI/115,
116 MALABAR COMPLEX, GB
ROAD
PALAKKAD
KERALA- 678001
Silver and Silver alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 2112 :
2014
109
6400036505
10.12.2015
SUPARNA JEWELLEY
DOOR NO 11/31,
KOTTAPURAM, PEROLE,
NILESWAR P.O
KASARAGOD
KERALA- 671314
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
110
6400036606
10.12.2015
KRISHNAS FASHION
JEWELLERY
DOOR NO 9/11, CHRTHALA
P.O,
ALAPPUZHA
KERALA- 688524
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
111
6400036707
10.12.2015
PAVITHRAM JEWELLERS
V/189, PEYAD P.O
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
KERALA- 695573
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
112
6400036808
10.12.2015
VGABM GOLD LIMITED
LIABILITY PARTNER T
SHIP
VII/598F,OPP. BUS
STAND,VENGARA
MALAPPURAM
KERALA- 676304
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940
4315
113
6400036909
10.12.2015
SUMANGALI JEWELLERS
DOOR NO.XV/693/1
THAIKKAD JUN.
GURUVAYOOR
THRISSUR
KERALA- 680104
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
114
6400037204
21.12.2015
SURABHI JEWELLERY
HOSPITAL ROAD,
KODUNGALLUR
THRISSUR
KODUNGALLUR
KERALA- 680664
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
115
6400037305
21.12.2015
AADHAR GOLD PERAMBRA
LLP
DOOR NO.12/1309-
1315,VADAKKANDI
BUILDING, CALICUT ROAD
PERAMBRA
KOZHIKODE
KERALA- 673525
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
116
6400037406
22.12.2015
PARAMEL PAVIZHAM
JEWELLERY
OCHANTHURUTH P.O, VYPIN
ERNAKULAM
KERALA- 682508
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
117
6400037507
22.12.2015
DIVINE GOLD
CALICUT ENCLAVE,IST
FLOOR, 5/3129,B5,B6, UKS
ROAD
KOZHIKODE
KERALA- 673001
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
118
6400038004
13.01.2016
KAVITHA GOLD AND
DIAMONDS
DOOR NO XVI/283 TO 294,
CALICUT
ROAD,VALANCHERY
MALAPPURAM
KERALA-676552
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
119
6400038105
13.01.2016
ANUMOD FASHION
JEWELLERY
DOOR NO.(OLD) X/143-
B,(NEW) VIII/591,
PATTIMATTOM
ERNAKULAM
KERALA-683562
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
120
6400038206
13.01.2016
MINA JEWELLERY
DOOR NO.6/416.OLD,
MYSOOR ROAD,
MANTHAVADY P.O
WAYANAD
KERALA-670645
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
121
6400038307
13.01.2016
THANGALS JEWELLERY
DOOR NO. VIII/580,
THARUVANA P.O
,THARUVANA
WAYANAD
KERALA-670731
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
4316
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
122
6400038408
13.01.2016
MALABAR FASHION
JEWELLERY
DOOR NO.VIII/395B,
PADINJARATHARA P.O,
MANATHAVADY (VIA)
WAYANAD
MANANTHAVADY
KERALA-673575
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
123
6400038509
13.01.2016
AL FAZAL GOLD SOUK
DOOR NO.X/1256E,NEAR
VYAPARA BHAVAN,
BADIYADKA ROAD.
KUMBALA P.O
KASARAGOD
KERALA-671321
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
124
6400038610
13.01.2016
NGD JEWELS
ROOM NO.-III/872 B,C,
THRISSUR ROAD,
VALANCHERY
MALAPPURAM
KERALA-676552
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
125
6400038711
13.01.2016
ZIYA GOLD
AKKARAMMAL COMPLEX,
593-O,593-N,
KURUMATHOOR,KP IV,
THALIPARAMBA
KANNUR
KERALA-670142
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
126
6400038812
13.01.2016
PUSHPALATHA JEWELLERY
VII/271,MARKET ROAD VII,
UDMA P.0,
KASARAGOD
KERALA-671319
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
127
6400038905
13.01.2016
DHANYA JEWELLERY
DOOR NO.XIV/16
,PUTHENPALLI AZHIKODE,
KODUNGALLUR
THRISSUR
KERALA-680666
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
128
6400039006
13.01.2016
VEKKALIAMMAN
JEWELLERS
AP/X/5, KOLLAM,
CHENKOTTA ROAD,
KAZHUTHURUTY P.O
KOLLAM
KERALA-691309
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
129
6400039107
13.01.2016
MOTHIRAVALLI JEWELLERY
NEAR GOVERNMENT
HOSPITAL ROAD, PERAVOOR
P.O
KANNUR
KERALA-670673
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
130
6400039208
13.01.2016
KOLATTUKUDY JEWELLERY
DOOR NO.391/11, MANJAPRA
P.O
ERNAKULAM
KERALA-683581
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940
4317
131
6400039309
13.01.2016
RAJAKUMARI GOLD SOUK
&SUPER MARKET
BUILDING NO.NP.14/723
MAIN ROAD
KALLAMBALAM P.O
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
KERALA- 695605
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
132
6400039511
14.01.2016
MUSCAT JEWELLERY
DOOR NO.17/306,
KUTHUPARAMBA
KANNUR
KERALA- 670643
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
133
6400039612
22.01.2016
NEW CHILANKA JEWELLERY
VII/758, RAILWAY STATION
ROAD, ALUVA
ERNAKULAM
KERALA- 683101
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
134
6400039705
22.01.2016
CRYSTAL JEWELLERS
T.C.38/1222(14),
VALAYAL CHETTY STREET,
CHALAI P.O
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
KERALA- 695036
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
135
6400039806
22.01.2016
THACHAPPALLY
JEWELLERY
PALLURUTHY, KOCHI
ERNAKULAM
KERALA- 682006
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
136
6400039907
22.01.2016
SHAADI GOLD AND
DIAMONDS
10/545,NADUVANNUR P.O
KOZHIKODE
KERALA- 673614
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
137
6400040088
22.01.2016
PALAZHI JEWELLERS
VAISHNAVAM BUILDING
45(NEW330) EZHIKAKATHU
JN.HARIPAD,HARIPAD
II(NEW IX)
ALAPPUZHA
KERALA-690514
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
138
6400040189
22.10.2016
OFFLAND GOLD AND
DIAMONDS
DOOR
NO.9/314A,314B,OFFLAND
ARCADE, ATHANI,ATHOLI
KOZHIKODE
KERALA- 673315
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
139
6400040290
22.10.2016
LAKSHMI JEWELLERY
BUILDING NO-
XIII/544A,KODUNGALLUR,
THRISSUR
KERALA-680664
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
140
6400040391
22.01.2016
SANGEETHA FASHION
JEWELLERY
DOOR NO.TP/11/77(OLD),
IV/95(NEW),
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
4318
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ANCHALUMOOD, PERINAD
P.O
KOLLAM
KERALA-691601
141
6400040492
22.01.2016
SANGEETHA JEWELLERY
ANCHALUMOOD, PERINAD
P.O
KOLLAM
KERALA-691601
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
142
6400040593
22.01.2016
BROTHERS JEWELLERY
WARD NO.1/375, MANGALAM
P.O, THRIKKUNNAPUZHA
ALAPPUZHA
KERALA-690515
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
143
6400040694
22.01.2016
FIRDOUS GOLD PATTAMBI
LLP
DOOR NO.XII/316-385 DUBAI
GOLD AND DIAMONDS,
PERINTHALMANNA ROAD,
PATTAMBI
PALAKKAD
KERALA-679303
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
144
6400040795
22.01.2016
FIRDOUS GOLD
VALANCHERY LLP
VP11/1003 G.H, IST AND IIND
FLOOR, QATAR PLAZA,
VALANCHERY
MALAPPURAM
KERALA-676552
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
145
6400040896
22.01.2016
FIRDOUS GOLD
RAMANATTUKARA LLP
KALLAKKAN BUILDING, 700-
A& 700-B,NEAR BUS STAND,
CALICUT ROAD,
RAMANATTUKARA
KOZHIKODE
KERALA-673633
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
146
6400041292
02.02.2016
THARAKANS SUISSE
JEWELLERY
CHAVAKKAD
THRISSUR
KERALA-680506
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
147
6400041393
02.02.2016
ANUGRAHA JEWELLERY
KOOTTAPADI ROAD,
PARA,P.O PERUMPADAPPA
MALAPPURAM
KERALA-679580
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
148
6400041494
02.02.2016
KANAKAM JEWELLERY
BUS STAD JUNCTION,
CHAVAKKAD
THRISSUR
KERALA- 680506
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
149
6400041595
02.02.2016
T.T JEWELLERY
ENAMAVU ROAD,
CHAVAKKAD
THRISSUR
KERALA- 680506
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940
4319
150
6400041696
02.02.2016
VARNAM JEWELLERY
PUTHANPALLY,PERUMPADA
PPA
MALAPPURAM
KERALA-679580
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
151
6400041797
02.02.2016
THARAKAN JEWELLERY
DOOR NO VII/150G,
CHAVAKKAD
THRISSUR
KERALA-680506
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
152
6400041898
02.02.2016
A.P.BALAKRISHNAPILLAI
13/250, PALAYAM ROAD
KOZHIKODE
KERALA-673001
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
153
6400041999
02.02.2016
SREELAKSHMI GOLD
&DIAMONDS
RAILWAY STATION ROAD
MAHE
PONDICHERY- 673310
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
154
6400042092
02.02.2016
SREEVALSAM GOLD AND
DIAMONDS PVT LTD
RAJAVALSAM BUILDING
571/A , NEAR BUS STAND
KONNI, PATHANAMTHITTA
MAIN ROAD
PATHANAMTHITTA
KERALA-689513
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
155
6400042193
02.02.2016
FIRDOUS GOLD CHEMMAD
PRIVATE LIMITED
(DUBAI GOLD AND
DIAMONDS), TP.V/851,859,
MAIN ROAD CHEMMAD,
TIRURANGADI P.O
MALAPPURAM
KERALA-676306
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
156
6400042799
09.02.2016
FIRDOUS JEWELS AND
DIAMONDS PRIVATE
LIMITED
21/621,D,E,F,G, CENTRAL
TOWER, DOWNHILL
MALAPPURAM
KERALA-676519
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
157
6400042803
09.02.2016
SWARNANJALI GOLD PARCO
DOOR NO.XIII/88-4,5 AND6,
KALPETTA MUNCIPALITY
WAYANAD
KERALA-673121
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
158
6400042904
09.02.2016
SWAYAMVARA JEWELLERS
X/532F, MALIKAMPEEDIKA,
ALANGAD P.O, ALUVA
ERNAKULAM
KERALA- 683511
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
159
6400043094
09.02.2016
SKY GOLD
ROOM NO. PMC VI/285,
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
IS 1417 :
2016
4320
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
OPP.NATIONAL COLEGE,
PERUMBA, PAYYANNUR P.O
KANNUR
KERALA- 670307
fineness and marking -
160
6400043195
09.02.2016
SKY GOLD
ROOM NO. KCP XIII,
1604A,KEEZHUR
CHAVASSERY
PANCHAYATH, MAIN ROAD
IRITTY
KANNUR
KERALA- 670703
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
161
6400043296
09.02.2016
SWAPNA FASHION
JEWELLERY
NEERUNGAL (BUILDING),
S.KALAMASSERY
ERNAKULAM
KERALA- 602033
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
162
6400043397
09.02.2016
KOICKAL JEWELLERS
32/73, PARK JUNCTION,
KAYAMKULAM
ALAPPUZHA
KERALA-690502
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
163
6400043498
09.02.2016
DAZE DIAMONDS LTD
PATHAYAPURA BUILDING,
ROUND SOUTH
THRISSUR
KERALA- 680001
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
164
6400043599
09.02.2016
KOICKAL JEWELLERS
HP 8/509, MAIN ROAD
HARIPPAD
ALAPPUZHA
KERALA- 690514
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
165
6400043906
08.02.2016
KUMBUKAL FASHION
JEWELLERY
VAZHOOR P.O
KOTTAYAM
KERALA- 686504
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
166
6400044096
18.02.2016
NIVEDHYAM JEWELLERS
711/399/400,
MALAYANKEEZH P.O
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
KERALA- 695571
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
167
640004419
18.02.2016
ARABIAN JEWELLERS
N H ROAD,
KARUNAGAPPALLY
KOLLAM
KERALA- 691001
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
168
6400044298
18.02.2016
METRO GOLD & DIAMONDS
4/93(4/1533), PULLUPALAM
ROAD, FORTKOCHI P.O,
KUNNUMPURAM, KOCHI
ERNAKULAM
KERALA- 682001
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940
4321
169
6400044399
18.02.2016
ARABIAN JEWELLERS
KUMPAZHA ROAD
PATHANAMTHITTA
KERALA- 689645
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
170
6400044403
18.02.2016
VIJAYAKRISHNA GOLD
CHADAYAMANGALAM,
KOTTARAKKARA
KOLLAM
KERALA- 691534
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
171
6400044807
25.02.2016
CHEMMANUR GOLD PALACE
INTERNATIONAL LTD.
BOBY CHEMMANUR
MARGIN FREE MINI
JEWELLERS
VETTOOR ARCADE,
NEAR KSRTC BUS STAND,
MAIN CENTRAL ROAD,
ETTUMANOOR
KOTTAYAM
KERALA- 686631
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
172
6400045098
03.03.2016
HIGHNESS JEWELLERY
XX/1080-1081, RESHMA
BUILDING, THAZHEPALAM,
TIRUR
MALAPPURAM
KERALA-676101
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
173
6400045199
03.03.2016
RAJADHANI JEWELLERS
DOOR NO.T.M 20/1140-41,
THAZHEPALAM, TIRUR
MALAPPURAM
KERALA-676101
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
174
6400045203
03.03.2016
MUGHAL JEWELLERS
PARAPPANAGADI ROAD,
TANUR
MALAPPURAM
KERALA- 676302
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
175
6400045304
03.03.2016
ALMADEENA JEWELLERY
11/530 G, ALATHIYOUR P.O,
TIRUR.2.
MALAPPURAM
KERALA-676102
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
176
6400045406
03.03.2016
AJANTHA JEWELLERS
B NO.VI/434, PARIYAPURAM,
POST PACHATHIRI, TIRUR.5.
MALAPPURAM
KERALA-676105
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
177
6400045506
03.03.2016
SUDHA GOLD
DOOR NO.10/293, CITY PARK
CENTRE, EZHUR ROAD,
TIRUR
MALAPPURAM
KERALA-676101
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
178
6400045607
03.03.2016
AMRUTHA GOLD &
DIAMOND
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
IS 1417 :
2016
4322
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
AMRUTHA BUILDING, 14/158,
CHETTPPADI, 14.
MALAPPURAM
KERALA-676319
fineness and marking -
179
6400046609
03.03.2016
TAJMAHAL GOLD
SUPERMARKET PVT LTD
DOOR NO.MP IV/380 NEAR
POST OFFICE, MELATTUR
MALAPPURAM
KERALA-679326
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
180
6400045809
04.03.2016
ARAB GOLD AND DIAMONDS
PVT LTD
SPXIX/1365,1366,1367, ADOOR
ROAD, BHARANIKAVU,
SASTHAMKOTTA P.O
KOLLAM
KERALA-690521
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
181
6400045910
04.03.2016
KALA JEWELLERY
ALTHARA,
PUNNAYOORKULAM
THRISSUR
KERALA-679561
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
182
6400046003
04.03.2016
KOYILAT GOLD AND
DIAMONDS
T.P 11/413&414 OPP. VILLAGE
OFFICE
KACHERI,PARAMBATH
THALAKULATHOOR
KOZHIKODE
KERALA-673317
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
183
6400046104
04.03.2016
ALEENA JEWELLERY
KURISUPALLY JUNCTION
VADUTHALA,CHITTOOR
ROAD,KOCHI
ERNAKULAM
KERALA-682023
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
184
6400046205
04.03.2016
FAIZAL JEWELLERS
EZHUR ROAD,TIRUR
MALAPPURAM
KERALA-676101
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
185
6400046306
04.03.2016
SWARNA JEWELLERY
3/953-2 NEAR STATE BANK
OF INDIA,CIVIL LANE ROAD,
VAZHAKKALA,
THRIKKAKARA P.O
ERNAKULAM
KERALA-682021
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
186
6400046407
04.03.2016
SREE KRISHNA GOLD &
DIAMONDS
ROOM NO. 6 TDB BUILDING,
AC ROAD, CHERTHALA
ALAPPUZHA
KERALA-688524
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
187
6400046508
04.03.2016
MANIGRAMAM JEWELLERY
OYOOR
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
IS 1417 :
2016
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940
4323
KOLLAM
KERALA-691510
fineness and marking -
188
6400046710
10.03.2016
FATHIMA GOLD & DIAMOND
BUILDING NO.7/101B,
KOLATHUR, KURUPPATHAL,
MOORKANAD PANCHAYATH
MALAPPURAM
KERALA-679338
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
189
6400046811
10.03.2016
NAVEEN JEWELLERY
BUILDING NO. XIII/273,
PAMPAKUDA P.O
ERNAKULAM
KERALA-686667
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
190
6400046912
15.03.2016
SWAPNA JEWELLERY
VECHOOR P.O, EDAYAZHAM
KOTTAYAM
KERALA-686144
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
191
6400047005
15.03.2016
M S GOLD $ DIAMONDS
THAVAKKAL COMPLEX-
IRITTY,KCP XIII/1613 A27-32
A48-51463,A64 IRITTY
XIII,IRITTY
KANNUR
KERALA-670703
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
192
6400047106
15.03.2016
SOUMYA JEWELLERY
P.P 12/582, OPP.SANKAR
CLINIC, PERAMBRA P.O
KOZHIKODE
KERALA-673525
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
193
6400047207
15.03.2016
KRISHNA GOLD SOUK
KUTTIPURAM ROAD,
VALANCHERY
MALAPPURAM
KERALA-676552
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
194
6400047308
15.03.2016
ARCHANA JEWELLERY
MAIN ROAD
KOLLAM
KERALA-691001
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
195
6400047409
15.03.2016
BEEMA JEWELLERY
AYOOR, AYOOR P.O
KOLLAM
KERALA-691533
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
196
6400047510
15.03.2016
NTM JEWELLERY
20/123,PANDIKKAD ROAD,
MANJERI
MALAPPURAM
KERALA/-676121
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
197
6400047611
15.03.2016
THEKKINEDATH JEWELLERY
EZHAVASAMAJAM
BUILDING,
CHENDAMANGALAM
JUNCTION, N. PARAVOUR
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
4324
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
[No. CMD/13:13]
K. KADIRVEL, Scientist ‘F’ & Head
ERNAKULAM
KERALA-683513
198
6400047712
15.03.2016
CHUNGATH
GOLD&DIAMONDS
CHUNGATH BUILDING MAIN
ROAD , IRINJALAKUDA
THRISSUR
KERALA-680125
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
199
6400048007
18.03.2016
DEEPTHI JEWELLERY
XII/409, CENTRAL JUCTION,
RAJAKUMARY P.O,
RAJAKUMARY
IDUKKI
KERALA-685619
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
200
6400048108
18.03.2016
MAHAR GOLD CENTRE
HIGH SCHOOL
ROAD,THRIPRANGODE
P.O,ALATHIYOOR
MALAPPURAM
KERALA-676102
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
201
6400048310
22.03.2016
AL FARDAN JEWELLERS
MAIN ROAD, KODUVALLY
KOZHIKODE
KERALA-673572
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
202
6400048411
28.03.2016
ATLAS GOLD
INTERNATIONAL
PAYYANUR
MALL,GOVT.HOSPITAL
ROAD,PAYYANUR
KANNUR
KERALA-670307
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
203
6400048512
28.03.2016
A.GEERI PAI
TC NO.40/3046,3047
BROADWAY
ERNAKULAM
KERALA-682031
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
204
6400048605
28.03.2016
CHUNGATH GOLD
CHUNGATH JEWELLERY,
ALUVA ROAD, ANGAMALY
ERNAKULAM
KERALA-683572
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
205
6400048706
28.03.2016
DISIGNER JEWELLERS
PARAPPANGADI ROAD, P.O
TANUR
MALAPPURAM
KERALA-676302
Gold and gold alloys,
jewellery/artefacts –
fineness and marking -
IS 1417 :
2016
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940
4325
Je vkSj jkstxkj ea=kky;
ubZ fnYyh] 14 twu] 2018
dk-vk- 972.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj Hkkjrh;
LVsV cSad ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky; ua- 1] fnYyh ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 262@2017) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 14-06-
2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&12012@78@2016&vkbZvkj (ch&I)º
jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT
New Delhi, the 14th June, 2018
S.O. 972.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 262/2017) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court No. 1, Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank
of India and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 14.06.2018.
[No. L-12012/78/2016-IR (B-I)]
RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE PRESIDING OFFICER: CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR
COURT No.1: ROOM No.511, DWARKA COURT COMPLEX, SECTOR 10, DWARKA, DELHI
ID No. 262/2017
Shri Devi Lal Prasad S/o Shri Duryodhan Prasad,
Represented by
Indian Steel and Metal Workers Union(Regd.)
46 – Nehru Market (Patera),
Badarpur,
New Delhi -110044
…Workman
Versus
(i)
The Chief Manager,
State Bank of India,
Opp. Tughlakabad Metro Station,
Badarpur,
New Delhi 110044
(ii)
M/s. Federal Security Service Pvt.
522, 5th Floor, Inder Prakash Building,
21, Barakhamba Road, Connaught Place,
New Delhi 110001
…Management
AWARD
Central Government, vide letter No.L-12012/78/2016-IR(B-I) dated 22.09.2017, under clause (d) of sub-section
(1) and sub-section (2-A) of Section 10 referred an industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication with the
following terms:
“Whether the action of the management of State Bank of India, opposite Tughlakabad Metro Station,
Badarpur, New Delhi and M/s Federal Security Service Pvt. Ltd. in terminating the services of the
workman Shri Devi Lal Meena with effect from 19.08.2014 is fair and legal? If not, to what relief the
workman are entitled to and from which date?”
4326
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2.
In the reference order, the appropriate Government commanded the party raising the dispute to file statement of
claim, complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses with this Tribunal within 15 days of receipt of
the reference order and to forward a copy of such statement of claim to the opposite party/ies involved in the dispute.
Despite directions so given, Shri Devi Lal Meena opted not to file his claim statement with the Tribunal.
3.
On receipt of the above reference, notice was sent to the claimant as well as the management. Neither the postal
article, referred above, was received back nor was it observed by the Tribunal that postal services remained affected
during the period, referred above. Therefore, every presumption lies in favour of the fact that the above notice was
served upon the claimant. Despite service of the notice, claimant opted to abstain from the proceedings and no claim
statement was filed on his behalf. Thus, it is clear that the claimant is not interested in adjudication of the reference on
merits.
4.
Since the claimant has neither put in his appearance nor has he led any evidence so as to prove his cause against
the management, as such, this Tribunal is left with no choice, except to pass a ‘No Dispute/Claim’ award. However, it
is made clear that there is no adjudication of the case on merits, as such, claimant is still at liberty to agitate his cause in
accordance with law. An award is accordingly passed. Let this award be sent to the appropriate Government, as
required under Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, for publication.
A. C. DOGRA, Presiding Officer
Dated : May 17, 2018
ubZ fnYyh] 14 twu] 2018
dk-vk- 973.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj ÚaVykbu
(,ulhvkj) fctusl lkWY;w'kal fyfeVsM ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd
fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] Hkqous'oj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 67@2016) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS]
tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 14-06-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&12025@01@2018&vkbZvkj (ch&I)º
jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 14th June, 2018
S.O. 973.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 67/2016) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Bhubaneswar as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of The
Frontline (NCR) Business Solutions Pvt. Ltd. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 14.06.2018.
[No. L-12025/01/2018-IR (B-I)]
RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT BHUBANESWAR
Present:
Shri B.C. Rath,
Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-cum-Labour
Court, Bhubaneswar.
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 67/2016
Date of Passing Award – 1st May, 2018
Between :
The Frontline (NCR) Business Solutions
Pvt. Ltd., N4/186, IRC Village, Nayapalli,
Near Usthi Hospital,
Bhubaneswar – 751 215
…1st Party-Management
(And)
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940
4327
Shri Kartika Chandra Pradhan,
S/o. Dhruba Charan Pradhan,
At. Ramvilla, PO. Borikina,
Ps. Balikuda, Dist. Jagatsinghpur – 754 110
…2nd Party-Applicant
Appearances:
None
…
For the 1st Party-Management
Shri K.C. Pradhan
…
For Himself the 2nd Party-Applicant
AWARD
This is an application under sub-section 2 & 3 of section 2-A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (in short
“The Act”) preferred by the applicant, Shri Kartika Chandra Pradhan, son of Dhruba Charan Pradhan P.S. Balikuda,
Jagatsinghpur for a direction to the Opp. Party-Management of M/s. Frontline (NCR) Business solutions Pvt. Ltd. to
reinstate him with all back wages and other service benefits.
2.
The case of the applicant, as revealed from his statement of claim, is that he was appointed as a Facility
Attendant on 23.11.2013 and directed to perform his duty as a Security Guard at HDFC Bank, Vivekananda Marg,
Bhubaneswar. After joining he performed all his duties with utmost sincerity and honesty to the best satisfaction of his
employers. In the month of August, 2015 he was directed to work at HDFC Bank at Keonjhar. He availed leave from
01.11.2015 to 07.11.2015 for illness of his mother. On 08.11.2015 when he reported to his duty, the Operational
Manger did not allow him to resume his duty and verbally informed him that his service was already terminated. As he
was not served with any notice pay and retrenchment compensation prior to such refusal of employment, he raised a
dispute before the A.L.C.(C) in view of he worked for more than 240 days continuously in a twelve months calendar
year preceding to his refusal of employment. According to him his juniors are still continuing in service. As
conciliation proceeding failed and a certificate in this regard was issued to him by the A.L.C.(C) without taking any
initiation for referring the dispute to the Tribunal, he is compelled to prefer the application resorting to the provisions of
sub-section 2 and 3 of Section 2-A of the Act.
3.
As the Opp. Party-Management did not appear and contest the claim inspite of sufficiency of notice, he has
been set exparte. The applicant-workman has examined himself as A.W.-1 and filed copy of the deployment order
dated 23.11.2013, copy of the representation of the workman to the Central Labour Commissioner, copy of the letter of
the A.L.C.(C), Bhubaneswar dated 24.2.2016, copy of the certificate issued by the A.L.C.(C) on dated 27.6.2016 and
copy of the I-Card issued to the workman in support of his pleadings advanced in his statement of claim.
4.
As per his unchallenged and uncontroverted statement filed in form of sworn affidavit he was appointed on
23.11.2013 by the Opp. Party-Management to perform the duty of security guard at HDFC Bank, Vivekananda Marg,
Bhubaneswar. According to him he continued to work as such in different branches of the HDFC Bank including the
branch at Keonjhar after his appointment. He availed leave on 01.11.2015 to 07.11.2015 for illness of his mother. On
08.11.2015 when he reported to his duty he was refused employment. According to him he was engaged continuously
and uninterruptedly for more than 240 days in twelve calendar months preceding to his alleged refusal of employment.
He has asserted that he was not provided with notice pay or retrenchment compensation prior to his alleged
disengagement. Such disengagement being in violation of Section 25-F of the Act, he is entitled to reinstatement with
back wages. He has also stated that persons engaged subsequent to him are continuing in service. There is no reason to
disbelieve his unchallenged and uncontroverted sworn statement. On the other hand, the documents filed by him more
particularly the deployment order, Ext.-1 allegedly issued by the Opp. Party-Management supports his version. That
apart, perusal of other documents like copy of the complaint letter issued to the labour machinery and notice issued by
the labour machinery to the Opp. Party-Management, the certificate issued by the labour machinery and the copy of the
I.D. card allegedly issued by the Opp. Party-Management are lending credential to his statement. In the above premises,
there is no other alternative than to reaching a conclusion that the applicant workman was employed by the Opp. Party-
Management with effect from 23.11.2013 to work as a Security Guard in the branches of the HDFC Bank and he was
in continuous service till he was refused employment with effect from 08.11.2015 without being paid notice pay and
retrenchment compensation. Thus, his disengagement amounts to retrenchment in violation of provisions of Section
25-F of the Act. He is stated to be not in gainful employment after his retrenchment. That being the fact the Opp. Party-
Management is required to reinstate him with all back wages and other service benefits.
Hence, it is ordered that, the applicant workman be reinstated with immediate effect along with all his back
wages and service benefits within two months of the publication of the award failing which, the applicant is entitled to
receive interest at a rate of 8% on the wages and benefits to which the applicant is entitled to receive. Copy of this
award be sent for publication in the official gazette as per the rules.
Dictated & Corrected by me.
B. C. RATH, Presiding officer
4328
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ubZ fnYyh] 14 twu] 2018
dk-vk- 974.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj mÙkj jsyos
ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k
,oa Je U;k;ky;] y[kuÅ ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 54@2013) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 14-06-2018 dks çkIr gqvk
FkkA
¹la- ,y&41012@16@2013&vkbZvkj (ch&I)º
jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 14th June, 2018
S.O. 974.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 54/2013) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Lucknow as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Northern
Railway and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 14.06.2018.
[No. L-41012/16/2013-IR (B-I)]
RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW
PRESENT : RAKESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer
I.D. No. 54/2013
Ref.No. L-41012/16/2013-IR(B-I) dated 15.07.2013
BETWEEN :
Sri Ram Awadh S/o Shri Merai
R/o Raipur Semraha, P.O. Naipur,
Gonda(UP)
AND
1.
The Divisional Railway Manager,
Northern Railway,
DRM, Hazratganj,
Lucknow (UP)
AWARD
1
By order No. L-41012/16/2013-IR(B-I) dated 15.07.2013 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour,
New Delhi in exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of sub section (1) and sub section (2A) of Section 10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) referred this industrial dispute between Sri Ram Awadh S/o Shri Merai,
Gonda and the DRM, NR, Lucknow for adjudication.
2.
The reference under adjudication is:
“WHETHER THE ACTION OF THE MANAGEMENT OF NORTHERN RAILWAY, LUCKNOW IN
IMPOSING THE PUNISHMENT OF REMOVAL FROM SERVICES UPON SRI RAM AWADH S/O
SRI MERAI W.E.F. 27.08.2010 AND HIS APPEAL DISMISSAL ORDER DATED 24.02.2011, IS
LEGAL AND JUSTIFIED? TO WHAT RELIEF THE CONCERNED WORKMAN IS ENTITLED?”
3.
The workman in his claim statement W-6 has stated in brief that he was appointed as Porter on 5.12.1980,
under the administrative control of the opposite parties, on 26.4.1999 he was transferred from Ayodhya to Sarai
Harakhoo on 26.4.99 LPC was provided to him by Station Supdt., NR Ayodhya but did not give him the Spare Memo;
and Duty Pass was also not given to him, yet the applicant reached Sarai Harakhoo to report for duty on his own
expenses but he was not permitted by the Station Supdt., because he did not have Spare Memo. It has further been
stated in the claim statement that the petitioner was compelled to run several times between Sarai Harakho and
Ayodhya, but neither he was permitted to join duty at Sarai Harkhoo nor Spare Memo was provided to him. Therefore
he was compelled to file OA no. 629/2005 before the CAT, Lucknow, vide order dated 7.09.2006 the CAT directed the
opposite party to consider his request and to resolve his grievances.
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940
4329
4.
The petitioner has further emphasized that opposite party no.2 DOM, NR was annoyed with him for filling the
case before the CAT and did not permit him to resume his duty, issued him a major penalty charge sheet dated
04.05.2007 with the allegations that the workman has been abstaining himself from duty since 26.4.99, the aforesaid
order in itself is not correct since the petitioner was intentionally harassed by Statio Supdt. Ayodhya and Sarai
Harakhoo. It has further been stated that D&AR enquiry was delayed and he was kept out of job on the pretext of the
pendency of enquiry, although representation dt. 24.12.2007, 20.1.2008 and 3.3.2008 were sent by him. Due to
continuous alleged harassment the matter was raised before RLC( C ) Lucknow in Jan.2009 by the workman, after
prolonged discussion under conciliation proceeding a settlement was made and the opposite party thereby agreed to
provide Spare Memo so as to facilitate the joining of the workman.
5.
The workman has stressed that he was asked to submit an affidavit regarding his sickness from 16.04.99 to
23.03.2008 before permitting him to join his duty. Under the compelled circumstances being faced since 1999 the
petitioner submitted an affidavit drafted by the opposite party, thereafter he was permitted to join on 05.06.2008 on the
post of Porter at Sarai Harkhoo Station but the enquiry proceedings were not dropped. The workman has alleged that
the enquiry was not conducted as per rules, no prosecution witness appeared before the enquiry officer, the workman
was not given any opportunity to cross examine the material-witness, moreover he was not permitted to submit his
defence. The enquiry report has allegedly been quite perverse, it lacked fairness and the consequent order of removal
from service was patently illegal since it was passed after 2 years and 5 months from the date of receipt of the report of
the enquiry officer. The aforesaid affidavit dt. 12.03.2008 drafted by the opposite party staff has been dealt with, it was
infact fictitious and manipulated. Appeal filed by the workman was withdrawn on the advice of the office staff and the
same was rejected with a non speaking order dt. 24.02.2011. It has further been stated in the claim statement that the
Disciplinary Authority and the Appellatte Authority did not consider the material fact properly, 30 years service
rendered by the workman was also ignored, and very harsh punishment of removal from service was passed which is
disproportionate, unjust and illegal.
6.
With the aforesaid pleadings request has been made by the workman to declare the termination order dt.
27.08.2010 as illegal, and prayer has been made for reinstatement with full back wages etc.
7.
Several documents have been annexed with the claim statement.
8.
With strong denial of the allegations leveled in the claim statement, management has filed written statement M-7.
It has been admitted that the workman was transferred on 26.04.99 from Ayodhya to Sarai Harkhoo but he failed to join
duty and was treated as absent from 26.04.99 to 02.03.2008, therefore major punishment penalty charge sheet was
issued under rules and an enquiry was conducted comprehensively. The opposite party has stated that because of being
found guilty for unauthorized absence, enquiry report was submitted and penalty of removal from service was imposed.
The management has admitted the proceedings before RLC ( C ) Lucknow. The enquiry was quite fair, proper and
ample opportunity was provided to workman to defend himself and he has participated in the enquiry proceedings.
9.
The opposite party has further stated that the workman himself on his own, has submitted affidavit before the
Railway Authorities mentioning therein that he was sick from 16.04.99 to 20.03.2008 but before the Tribunal he
wrongly alleged that the affidavit was taken by manipulation by the Railway Officers. Since the petitioner has
abstained himself from the duty for about 8 years without any information of leave for his sickness etc, the order of
removal from service is fully justified and proper.
10.
Thereafter, rejoinder W-8 has been filed by the workman, reiterating the pleas taken in the claim statement,
allegations made in the written statement have been denied. As per application M-12 certain documents have been filed
by the management.
11.
On 14.10.2015 following preliminary issues were framed;
1.
Whether the departmental enquiry is fair and proper?
2.
Whether the findings of the enquiry officer are perverse?
12.
The workman has filed affidavit W-13 in evidence. He has been cross examined on behalf of the management.
Opposite party filed an affidavit M-15 of an employee of the DRM office. MW has been cross examined on behalf of
the workman. Vide order dt. 12.8.16 it has been held by this Tribunal that the departmental enquiry was not conducted
in fair and proper manner. Consequential findings of the enquiry officer were treated as perverse. Both the preliminary
issues were decided against the opposite party. However although several opportunities were provided to the
management to adduce his evidence. It could not submit any evidence further the management furnished a copy of
letter dt. 18.10.2016 informing thereby that the then Station Supdt. Ayodhya and Sarai Harkhoo who have retired much
earlier, have died.
4330
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
13.
Arguments of both the parties have been heard at length. Record has been scanned thoroughly.
14.
Learned AR for the workman has submitted that illegal and harsh order of removal from service was passed by
the management and this fact was ignored that the petitioner could not attend the duty because of his ailment, his
superior authority/Station Supdt. intentionally harassed him and did not permit him to join duty. On the contrary the
management has emphasized that the workman has been quite habitual to abstain himself from duty without any
genuine reason more over no prior permission was taken by the workman. The management has further submitted that
the enquiry was conducted quite comprehensively and as per Rules, sufficient opportunity was provided to the
workman to defend himself.
15.
In this regard the so called memo of settlement dt. 29.02.2008, admitted to both the parties, is also quite
relevant. The management although accepted this document, asserts that the varacity and legality can not be inferred
since it has not been signed by the competent authority. Learned AR for the workman while taking strong objection to
this submission asserts that the authority of RLC ( C ) is being challenged by the management before this Tribunal.
16.
It is evident from the record that the then Station Supdt. Ayodhya and Sarai Harkhoo, Sri Tilak Dhari and
Sri Govind Nigam were not produced in the enquiry on the ground that they had retired. This ground of non producing
witness does not appear satisfactory. The address of retired railway officials, who have been taking regular pensionary
benefits etc, could be easily obtained. More over no sincere effort was made by the management to adduce those retired
officer before this Tribunal as well, although the learned AR for the management sought several adjournments on this
ground, but his efforts were futile, since superior railway officers did not make any sincere endeavour in this regard.
17.
Last para of the enquiry report dated 20.3.08 is very crucial wherein it has been mentioned by the enquiry
officer that the charges can not be proved with cogent evidence, since the then Station Supdts., have retired earlier.
18.
The findings recorded by this Tribunal/Court vide order dt. 12.8.16, have not been challenged before any other
Hon’ble Competent Court. Despite being provided sufficient opportunity, no further evidence in support of the charges
framed against the workman could be adduced by the management. This fact is not to be over looked that during the so
called long absence of the petitioner, whether any memo/charge sheet was sent by the management or any such receipt
therefore was obtained. The delay of about 28 months after the final findings of the enquiry officer having been
received, has also not been genuinenly explained by the management. No doubt an affidavit dt. 12.3.08 is on record
wherein fact of w.e.f. 16.4.99 to 2.3.08 has been mentioned. But on account of this affidavit the inference drawn by the
enquiry officer and competent disciplinary authority can not be appreciated legally.
19.
After having heard the intellect arguments of both the Learned Authorized Representatives, in the light of the
record available before this court, it is inferred that the order of removal from service, passed by the management
against the workman and further both the dismissal order dt. 27.08.2010 and the appellate order dated 24.02.2011, can
not be adjudged as legal and justified. The termination order and the appellate order are set aside. The workman is
entitled to reinstatement from the relevant date and he shall get all the pecuniary benefit as well. The management is
directed to ensure the payment of arrears to the workman within 10 weeks from the date of publication of award failing
which the workman shall also get interest @ 6% per annum.
20.
Award as above.
LUCKNOW
11.01.2018
RAKESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 14 twu] 2018
dk-vk- 975.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eè; jsyos
ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k
,oa Je U;k;ky;] dkuiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 132@1992) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 14-06-2018 dks çkIr
gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&41012@106@91&vkbZvkj (ch&I)º
jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 14th June, 2018
S.O. 975.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 132/1992) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940
4331
Labour Court, Kanpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Central Railway
and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 14.06.2018.
[No. L-41012/106/91-IR (B-I)]
RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SRI SHUBHENDRA KUMAR, HJS, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOR COURT, KANPUR
Industrial Dispute No. 132/1992
Between –
President,
Rashtriya Chaturth Shreni Rail Mazdoor Congress,
2/236 Namner,
Agra-282001.
And
Divisional Railway Manager (P),
Central Railway,
Jhansi-284001.
AWARD
1.
Central Government, Mol & Employment, New Delhi, vide notification no. L-41012/106/91/IRDU dated
06.11.92, has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal.
2.
Whether the action of the railway administration of Mathura Junction in not regularizing the services of
Sri Dhamendra Singh, alias Dharmendra Singh son of Sri Dangal Singh, Ex-MRCL and also terminating his
services w.e.f. 01.08.89 is justified? If not, what relief he is entitled to?
3.
The case of the worker in short is that he was in continuous employment under the management of Central
Railway since 19.04.78, and during the period 28.04.87 to 30.07.89, while posted under Station Master, Farah,
Mathura he worked at the post of APM (MRCL), the management discontinued the services of the worker with
effect from 01.08.89, without issuing any charge sheet, without making any payment with regard to
retrenchment compensation, without any notice or notice pay. He was medically fit. It is alleged that his
colleague employees were made permanent in the employment of the railway and when he demanded for his
regularization and bonus, the employers became annoyed and ultimately he was removed by the employers. It is
also alleged that the employer had not taken back the workman in the employment in terms of letter no.
P/161/O/OP/Screening/Recruitment dated 05.09.89 that was issued to T.I. Mathura.
4.
It is also alleged by the worker that the management after his disengagement from the services of the railway
had given regular and permanent appointment to S/Sri Phool Singh son of Nekram, Pooran Singh son of
Laxman Singh, Ativeer Singh son of Sri Sarnam, Singh. Radhey Shyam son of Nathuram, on the basis of award
rendered by this Tribunal in this way the management has violated the provisions of section 25F, 25G and 25H
of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. After disengagement, the worker and his family members are at the stage of
starvation mainly for the reasons that he is jobless and in this context a notice dated 21.11.89 was also sent to
the railway administration but no action was taken on it by the railway administration.
5.
The management has filed written statement in which the entire claim of the worker has been denied for want of
proof. It is denied by the management that at any point of time he was disengaged from the railway service. The
hard fact that remains is that the worker himself has left his job without any information and his claim in the
manner and way as presented before this tribunal cannot be granted by this tribunal. By way of additional pleas
it has been stated that the services of the worker had never been terminated with effect from 01.08.89 and it
seems that the worker had taken employment on the basis of fake card and to cover the said flaw he has avoided
to file any relevant documents and as such the worker is trying to seek such relief from this tribunal which
under no circumstances can be granted in his favor. Since the claimant has not disclosed any particular about his
employment and has himself absconded from the place of work and also not represented before the appropriate
authority for granting status his claim brought before the tribunal is false bogus and fabricated hence is liable to
be rejected.
6.
Worker has filed rejoinder in the case but nothing new has been detailed therein except reiteration of the facts
already pleaded in the claim petition.
4332
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
7.
It is pertinent to mention that in this case an award was passed ex-parte on 21.05.96 against the management.
Thereafter the management has moved an application for recalling the order which was also rejected by my
learned predecessor. Management has thereafter filed CMWP NO.8503/98 DRM versus PO, CGIT and the
Hon’ble Court vide order dated 04.02.08 set aside and quashed the ex-parte award dated 21.05.96 and the
matter was remitted back to this tribunal for deciding it afresh.
8.
On behalf of the worker Dharmendra Singh has been examined as w.w.1 and on behalf of the management
M.W.1 Sri D.P. Meena working in personnel department has been examined.
9.
Worker along with rejoinder has filed letter of Station Superintendent as Annexure-1, Service card of worker
Annexure-2 showing details of engagement, annexure 2-A, medical certificate, Annexure 3, order granting
bonus , annexure 4, Duty Pass annexure-5A and 5-B, Calculation chart of working days of worker, annexure 6,
notice sent to the management, annexure 7, claim statement filed by union against DRM in I.D. Case no. 10 of
87, annexure 8, engagement of hot weather waterman, annexure 9, letter regarding filling of vacancies in group
D annexure 10.
10.
Worker has also filed application for seeking information under RTI paper no. 4/5-7 and its reply paper no. 4/10
trough list 39/2.
11.
Opposite party management has filed copy of live register 34/2-18 through list 34/1 and has also filed letter
regarding inquiry of worker and medical record of worker through list A/10.
12.
I have heard the arguments of the authorized representative for the worker and none appeared for submitting
arguments on behalf of the management. I have also perused the whole record carefully.
13.
The case of the worker is that for the first time he was appointed under the management on 19.04.78 and
continuously worked and during the period 28.04.87 to 30.07.89 he worked under Station Master, Farah,
District Mathura and acquired the status of Monthly Rated Casual Labor (in short MRCL) and his services were
discontinued with effect from 01.08.89, without any charge sheet, without any show cause notice and without
making payment of retrenchment compensation and in this way the railway management has violated the
provisions of 25F, 25G and 25H of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Whereas on the other hand the case of the
management is that they never terminated the services of the worker and the worker has left the job of his own
on 01.08.89 without any information and therefore, he is not entitled for the protection of the provisions of
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
14.
The worker in support of his case has examined himself and in his examination in chief he has deposed the
version made by him in his claim petition by stating that he was appointed on 19.04.78 as casual worker and
attained the status of MRCL on 20.07.87. He has further stated that he continuously worked during the period
28.07.87 to 30.08.89 and his original service card is with the department and whatever documents have been
filed by him, the original of the same are in the custody of the department.
15.
In his cross examination the worker has expressed his ignorance about the fact that any case was filed by him
before Central Administrative Tribunal at New Delhi and it is also not in his notice whether any decision was
given by the court or not. He has further stated that the letter that was sent from the office of DRM(P) in the
month of Marcy, 87 was received by him, carbon copy of which has been filed by him and the same is on record
and after receipt of the said letter he deposited entire original documents in the railway department. He does not
remember that the department vide paper no. 20/9 had informed that his casual labor card is fake and forged.
The witness of his own stated that there is difference between name Dharmend and Dharminder therefore, he
has been asked to sit. The copy of the letter in which the above suggestion was given has not been filed by him.
He further stated that he had never been informed that his service card is fake and bogus thereby he will be
prevented from the service. Witness has further stated that after sending the original card in March 97, he
moved application and he cannot state that its copy has been filed or not. He denied the fact that after
conducting inquiry, railway administration found his service card as bogus and forged and for this reason he
was denied employment by the railway administration.
16.
Management witness Sri D P Meena in his examination in chief has stated that as per record no person by the
name of Dharmend alias Dharmender Singh was found working under the Station Master Farah either during
the period 19.04.78 to 28.4.87 and on 30.07.89. He has further stated that no person by the above name was
retrenched on 01.08.89. The documents that were deposited by the worker on verification were found bogus,
fake and forged.
17.
In his cross examination the witness has clearly stated that whatever deposition is made by him is on the basis
of documents. Witness has admitted in his cross examination that the muster roll of the period during which the
worker is alleged to have worked under the railway has not been filed. Witness has the fact that casual labour
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940
4333
card no. 11888 was issued by Sri M K Gupta working in the railway. There are several matters in which on
inquiry service cards were found bogus and those have been ceased. On a specific question put before the
witness that whether any record has been filed with regard to the service cards found fake witness replied that
the record is on the file. Witness has also denied the fact that any card in the name of worker was ever ceased.
He has also stated that records are preserved for 10 years thereafter they are destroyed. The witness has half
heartedly stated that the services of the worker were not terminated rather worker had left the job of his own
accord in the year 1989. The witness has admitted that a casual labor who had worked continuously for 120
days are given status of MRCL and when any worker is converted from DRCL to MRCL his medical
examination is done. Witness has expressed his ignorance about the fact as to whether worker was ever
medically examined or not.
18.
From the pleadings of the parties, evidence oral and documentary it is clearly established that the worker was
employed by the railway administration as casual labor and subsequently he attained the status of MRCL.
Whereas the case of the worker is that he was illegally retrenched from the service of the railway, the case of
the management is that on 01.08.89, the worker himself has absconded from the service without any
information. Even this fact has also been admitted by the management witness in his cross examination.
19.
It contended by the authorized representative for the worker that when the worker had attained the status of
MRCL and had left the job willingly as pr management contention, it was incumbent upon the management to
have conducted a detailed inquiry and ought to have issued notice to the worker asking therein that he is
absconding from the service without any information and he should report for his duty by such and such time
otherwise he will be subjected to disciplinary action and not taking any action would entail the action of the
management as illegal and in breach of the provisions of rules of natural justice. It is also contended by the
authorized representative for the worker that the railway management has not filed any documents to show that
any inquiry regarding absence of the worker was conducted at any point of time.
20.
The authorized representative for the worker on the above point has placed reliance of a decision given by
Hon’ble Supreme Court reported in 2004 (103) FLR 102 in the case of NICKS (INDIA) TOOLS AND RAM
SURAT AND ANOTHER, wherein the Hon’ble Court has held as under-
21.
”Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and having perused the records we notice that the
factum that the workman was in the service of the management till 22nd of April, 1993 is not disputed.
While the workman contends that his service from that day were wrongly terminated. The appellant
contends that the workman voluntarily left the service of the appellant. Since the respondent workman
was in the service of the appellant management at least up to the 2nd of the April, 1993, the burden of
proving ha he voluntarily left the service then falls on the appellant of proving that he voluntarily left the
services then falls on the appellant management.”
22.
The facts and circumstances of the case in hand are analogous to the facts and circumstances of the case decided
by Hon’ble Apex Court, the law cited by the authorized representative for the worker applies to the case in hand
with full swing.
23.
It is also contended by the authorized representative for the worker that the action of the management in
terminating the services of the worker is punitive and he relied upon a decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court
reported in 2006, Supreme Court Cases (L&S) between Hari Ram Maurya versus Union of India and others
wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court has held that Termination of service if punitive, inquiry therefore,
mandatory-held even though appellant is a temporary employee his services cannot be terminated on charge of
bribery without holding an inquiry and hereafter acting in accordance with law. In the present case also worker
is alleged to have absconded from service without any information with effect from 01.08.89, therefore, his
termination from the service without inquiry is punitive and without conducting inquiry by the management
termination of the service of the worker cannot be justified being in violation of rules of natural justice.
24.
The worker has also pleaded violation of the provisions of section 25F, 25G and 25H of the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947. In his pleadings and in his evidence the worker has stated that he continuously worked during the
period 24.08.87 to 30.07.89 and his services have been terminated with effect from 01.08.89 by the
management without complying with the provisions of the Act. The management witness half heartedly has
admitted the working of the worker by stating that the worker himself left the job on 30.07.89 and also that
Sri M K Gupta an employee of the railway has issued casual labour card no. 11888 on behalf of railway.
Therefore, in the light of above evidence of management witness it is established that the worker had worked
continuously for more than 240 days and it is so the railway administration was highly obliged to comply with
the provisions of 25F of the Act, and admittedly it has not been complied with by the railway administration by
paying the worker one month’s notice, notice pay in lieu of notice and retrenchment compensation. Thus it is
proved that the action of the railway administration in breach of provision of section 25F of the Act.
4334
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
25.
The worker has also stated in his pleadings and in his evidence that he attained the status of MRCL from daily
rated casual labor on 28.07.87 which fact has not been denied by the management either in its pleading or
evidence. Hence it is proved by the worker that he was granted temporary status by the railway administration
much before his termination from the service of the railway. Even from the documents filed and proved by the
worker it is proved that he was in the employment of the management as claimed by him.
26.
Therefore, having concluded that the worker was in the employment of the railway, worker having attained the
status of MRCL and also that the railway has badly breached the provisions of section 25F of the Act, hence the
action of the railway administration of Mathura Junction in terminating the services of Sri Dhanmender Singh
alias Dharmendra Singh son of Sri Dangal Singh Ex-MRCL w.e.f. 01.08.89, is neither legal nor justified.
27.
So far as question of regularizing the services of the worker is concerned no observation by this tribunal can be
given as it is the sole prerogative of the management to consider regularization of the worker in the service of
the railway administration. However, railway administration is directed to consider the case of the worker for
his regularization within six months from the date of publication of the award.
28.
Accordingly it is held that the worker is entitled to be reinstated in the service of the railway administration
w.e.f 01.08.89 on the same status and pay that was drawn by him but he will not be entitled for any back wages
because in his pleadings though the worker has pleaded that he is out of employment but in his evidence he has
failed to prove that he was never gainfully employed any where else. He shall also be deemed to be in
continuous service of railway administration.
29.
Reference is accordingly decided in favor of the worker and against the railway administration.
SHUBHENDRA KUMAR, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 14 twu] 2018
dk-vk- 976.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj baMlySaM
cSad fyfeVsM ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] y[kuÅ ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 30@2017) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 14-
06-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&12025@01@2018&vkbZvkj (ch&I)º
jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 14th June, 2018
S.O. 976.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 30/2017) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Lucknow as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Induslnd Bank
Ltd. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 14.06.2018.
[No. L-12025/01/2018-IR (B-I)]
RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW
PRESENT : RAKESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer
I.D. No. 30/2017
BETWEEN :
Sri Shashi Karan Nath Singh S/o Shri Shiv Karan Nath Singh
R/o 227, Samar Vihar Colony, Alambagh,
Lucknow-226005 (UP)
AND
1. The Managing Director,
Induslnd Bank Ltd., Corporate Office
8th Floor, 1, One India Bulls Centre, Jupiter
Mills Compound, 841, S.B. Marg, Elphinstone Road
(West) Mumbai-400 013
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940
4335
2.
Head Human Resources, Human Resources Dept.
Induslnd Bank Limited
8th Floor, 1, One India Bulls Centre, Jupiter
Mills Compound, 841, S.B. Marg, Elphinstone Road
(West) Mumbai-400 013
3.
Head Employees Relations, Human Resources Dept.
8th Floor, 1, One India Bulls Centre, Jupiter
Mills Compound, 841, S.B. Marg, Elphinstone Road
(West) Mumbai-400 013
4.
Regional Head, Branch Banking
Induslnd Bank Ltd. Plot No.628/10A, Khasra No.594/3
Faizabad Road, Indira Nagar, Lucknow-2260016
5.
Mr. Prakash Thacker, Enquiry Officer/Zonal HR
Partner-Banking Branch
8th Floor, 1, One India Bulls Centre, Jupiter
Mills Compound, 841, S.B. Marg, Elphinstone Road
(West) Mumbai-400 013
AWARD
1.
The workman Sri Shashi Karan Nath Singh has filed petition under Section 2A of the I.D. Act., mentioning
therein that he was appointed on 27.09.2012 in the establishment of the opposite party, on the post of Dy Vice
President. The applicant has asserted that although nomenclature of Dy. Vice President was given, yet he was
never vested with any powers like managerial, administrative or supervisory, rather his nature of duties was
purely clerical and operational. Subsequently he was promoted to the post Dy. Vice President-II and later on
Regional Head, Operational. It is alleged in the claim statement W-1 that the employees working in the
establishment of the opposite party are being given such nomenclature of post so that they may be ousted from
the perview of the “workman” and such employees may not take the shelter of Labour Laws such as I.D. Act.,
etc. The employees are being intentionally deprived of the benefits provided under the Labour Laws and
Gratuity laws.
2.
It has further been alleged in the claim statement that charge sheet dated 23.12.2016 was issued against the
petitioner which was served on him on 26.12.2016, an enquiry officer was appointed hurriedly. The workman
submitted his reply and refuted all the allegations, presenting officer was appointed, he appeared before the
Enquiry Officer and requested to provide relevant documents and the Defence Representative. It was
communicated to the workman there is heavy pressure from the side of the management to conclude the enquiry
on the same day and formalities were observed by the Enquiry Officer, and Enquiry Officer persuaded that he
would only get minor punishment viz. warning or censure. In such circumstances the petitioner did not cross
examine the management witness, after conclusion of the enquiry show cause notice dated 09.01.2017 was
issued, the reply was submitted by the petitioner and the petitioner emphasized that he had never accepted the
charges leveled against him. Separation and exit Interview Information was given through E-Mail etc. An order
of punishment dated 24.3.2017 was passed and opposite party imposed the punishment of dismissal from the
service of the bank without any notice. No independent witness was produced before the eenquiry officer.
Hence principle of natural justice was not followed. The concerned workman was not provided opportunity to
cross examine the material witness.
3.
The petitioner has alleged that the law laid down by the Hon Supreme Court in several cases has not been
followed by the management, under compelling circumstances the workman approached to RLC ( C ) Lucknow
through an application under Section 2A of the I.D. Act., cognizance was taken by him notice was issued to the
employer. The management did not attend the proceedings before the RLC ( C ), Lucknow, in the mean while
an E-Mail was sent to the workman regarding pending dues etc. Having no other alternative the workman
sought permission to file the case before this Tribunal. With the aforesaid pleadings request has been made to
set aside the order of punishment dated 24.3.2017, reinstating him with all consequential benefits including full
back wages etc.
4.
The management has filed written statement M-4, with denial of the allegation leveled in the claim statement.
The opposite party has asserted that the petitioner was employed in the managerial and supervisory capacity and
he is not covered under the definition of the “workman”. The opposite party has requested that applicant is not
entitled to any relief.
4336
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
5.
During the proceeding before this Court the workman has moved an application W-5 dated 29.11.2017
expressing his wish to withdraw the case from CGIT, Lucknow. The management has endorsed his no objection
on this application. Arguments of both the parties have been heard at length and record has been scanned
thoroughly.
6.
The workman mentioning his designation as Dy. Vice President/Regional Head, has claimed that managerial,
administrative or supervisory powers were not vested on him. Dismissal order dated 24.3.17 has been
challenged. The management has asserted that the petitioner is not covered under the definition of “workman”.
However, since the petitioner himself has expressed his desire to withdraw the case, no relief can be granted to
him. Accordingly the petition W-1 as being not pressed, is liable to be dismissed. The petitioner is not entitled
to any relief.
7.
Award as above.
LUCKNOW
30.01.2018
RAKESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 14 twu] 2018
dk-vk- 977.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj mÙkj
if'pe jsyos ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] t;iqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 50@2013) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 14-06-
2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&41011@30@2013&vkbZvkj (ch&I)º
jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 14th June, 2018
S.O. 977.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 50/2013) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Jaipur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of North Western
Railway and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 14.06.2018.
[No. L-41011/30/2013-IR (B-I)]
RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, JAIPUR
PRAMOD KUMAR CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
I.D. 50/2013
Reference No. L-41011/30/2013-IR (B-I) Dated: 4.10.2013
The President
Ajmer Jila Asangathit Shramik Sangh
306/34, Gurjar Tilla, Nagara,
Ajmer.
V/S
The Divisional Personnal Officer
North western Railway
Divisional Office
Ajmer.
For the applicant
:
Sh. R.C.Jain, Representative.
For the non-applicant
:
Shri L.P.Singhal, Advocate.
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940
4337
AWARD
17.4.2018
1.
The Central Government in exercise of the powers conferred under clause (d) of Sub Section 1 & 2 (A) of
Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 has referred the following Industrial dispute to this tribunal for
adjudication:-
“Whether the action of the management of North west Railway, Ajmer in not providing free pass,
P.T.O. facility, re-payment of tution fees to the family of workman Shri Rajesh Bhart is legal and
justified? To what relief she is entitled?”
2.
The case was called for several times. None responds for the applicant side. Advocate for opposite party is
present.
3.
The schedule which has been referred by Government of India/Bharat Sarkar, Ministry of Labour/Shram
Mantralaya dated 4.10.2013 indicates that the facilities demanding free pass, P.T.O. facility, repayment of tuition fees
to the family of workman Rajesh Bharti does not come within the jurisdiction of this tribunal because the statement of
claim has been submitted by the wife of the workman Rajesh Bharti who has been shown working as Station Master,
Railway Singawal, Distt: Ajmer. The so called workman Rajesh Bharti is still working as Station Master & he has
deserted his wife alongwith her/his children & has not been maintaining his wife & children but Rajesh Bharti has not
raised the aforesaid dispute regarding aforesaid reliefs.
4.
Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act defines the ‘workman’ as under:-
“(s) “workman” means any person (including an apprentice) employed in any industry to do any manual,
unskilled, skilled, technical, operational, clerical or supervisory work for hire or reward, whether the terms of
employment be express or implied, and for the purposes of any proceeding under this Act in relation to an
industrial dispute, includes any such person who has been dismissed, discharged or retrenched in connection
with, or as a consequence of, that dispute, or whose dismissal, discharge or retrenchment has led to that dispute,
but does not include any such person----
(i)
Who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950) , or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the
Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957) ; or
(ii)
Who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employees of a prison, or
(iii)
Who is employed mainly in a managerial or administrative capacity, or
(iv)
Who, being employed in a supervisory capacity, draws wages exceeding ( ten thousand rupees) per
mensem oir exercises, wither by the nature of the duties attached to the office or by reason of the powers
vested in him, functions mainly of a managerial nature.”
5.
The statement of claim submitted by wife of Rajesh Bharti indicates that Rajesh Bharti is a Station Master who
cannot be a workman u/s 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act because first he has been holding a managerial/supervisory
post & has also been drawing more than Rs.10,000/- as per the pay commission with a grade pay of Rs.4200/-. Wife of
Rajesh Bharti who is claiming her rights through his husband cannot come to the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal Cum Labour Court because first her husband must be the workman as per the definition of the section 2(s) of
the Industrial Disputes Act. Secondly she has a matrimonial dispute with her husband before the whole dispute come to
the jurisdiction of the Family Court or if the management of the Indian Railway does not provides such facilities to the
applicant wife of Rajesh Bharti than she may straight way go to the Central Administrative Tribunal as her husband’s
service matter can only be adjudicated in Central Administrative Tribunal.
6.
Reference is not maintainable in this tribunal & liable to be disposed off as not maintainable.
7.
Award as above.
PRAMOD KUMAR CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 20 twu] 2018
dk-vk- 978.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj Hkkjrh;
LVsV cSad ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] ukxiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 20@2013) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 20-06-2018 dks
çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&12012@05@2013&vkbZvkj (ch&I)º
jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
4338
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
New Delhi, the 20th June, 2018
S.O. 978.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 20/2013) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Nagpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of
India and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 20.06.2018.
[No. L-12012/05/2013-IR (B-I)]
RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRI S.S. GARG, PRESIDING OFFICER, CGIT-CUM-LABOUR COURT, NAGPUR
Case No. CGIT/NGP/20/2013
Date: 10.05.2018
Party No.1
:
The Asstt. General Manager
State Bank of India,
Zonal Office, Region-III,
S.V. Patel Marg, Kingsway,
Nagpur- 440 001.
V/s.
Party No.2
:
Sh. Dnyandeo Nivrutti Patil,
R/o. 40, Bigha Deshmukh
Nagar, Malkapur, Distt.
Buldhana (MS)
AWARD
(Dated: 10th May, 2018)
In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of section 10 of
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) (“the Act” in short), the Central Government has referred the industrial
dispute between the employers, in relation to the management of State Bank of India and their workman, Shri Dyandeo
Nivrutti Patil, for adjudication, as per letter No.L-12012/05/2013-IR (B-I) dated 21.05.2013, with the following
schedule:-
“Whether the action of the management of State Bank of India to discharge Shri Dnyandeo Niwrutti
Patil from the service is legal and justified? If not, then what relief the workman is entitled to? And
whether the quantum of punishment imposed upon him is proportionate to the misconduct so alleged?
If not, then what relief the workman is entitled to?”
2.
On receipt of the reference, parties were noticed to file their respective statement of claim and written
statement, in response to which, the workman Shri Dyandeo Nivrutti Patil, (“the workman” in short) filed the statement
of claim and the management of State Bank of India (“party no.1” in short) filed the written statement.
3.
Workman filed a statement of claim by asserting that he was appointed as a clerk and transferred at Malkapur
Branch in 07.09.1994. He also mentioned that his appointment was on compassionate ground because his father was
died in service of SBI.
Management decided to initiate disciplinary proceeding against him and charge sheet was issued on
09.10.2003. According to the workman enquiry was conducted by bank, enquiry report was submitted by the enquiry
officer, disciplinary authority punished him on 14.01.2008 as discharged from the service and applicant was removed
from the service on 28.01.2008. He files an appeal on 01.03.2008 which was dismissed.
According to the workman the departmental enquiry was conducted against him was not legal, fair and proper,
because enquiry officer and branch manager are friends to each other and enquiry officer was biased and prejudice to
him so the enquiry officer has not considered the evidence produced on his behalf as his defence. He also asserted that
judgment of enquiry officer is full of bias and entire report is perverse. He also prayed that the order of termination
will be set aside and he prayed for the reinstatement with full back wages and other consequential benefits.
4.
Management filed the written statement on 12.02.2014 and denied all material facts by asserting that charge
was fully proved and full opportunity was granted in conduction of departmental enquiry. Bank was also asserted that
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940
4339
charge sheet, report, show cause notice and punishment was given properly. Workman appeared before the
disciplinary authority to present his case through his defence representative. Disciplinary authority heard the workman
and his defence representative at length on the point of punishment. According to the management appellate authority
passed a proper judgment. According to the management his termination is just and proper so he is not entitled to any
relief.
5.
Both parties admitted that workman was appointed as clerk and posted at Malkapur Branch, District Buldhana.
It is also admitted that charge was framed on 09.10.2003 and workman was terminated from services on 14.01.2008. It
is also admitted that workman was governed by Shastri and Desai award and bipartite settlement.
6.
As this is a case of dismissal of the workman from services, after holding a departmental enquiry, the validity
of the departmental enquiry was taken as a preliminary issue for consideration and by order dated 23.03.2018, the
departmental enquiry conducted against the workman was held to be legal, proper and in accordance with the principles
of natural justice.
7.
On behalf of workman it was argued that the punishment was disproportionate. It was also argued on behalf
of the workman that, branch manager falsely called complaint from Mr. Laxminarayan Sharma by falsely promising
loan or cash credit. He also argued that, charge levelled against the workman is vague and the workman was
pressurized and dishonestly pursued it not to make complaint against the workman. According to the workman,
complaint was made by deceipt and falsehood but document Exhibit W-VIII and IX show a different defence as stated
in the statement of claim. So, this argument is not sustainable in my view.
8.
On the contrary, on behalf of the management it was argued that all charges against the workman was duly
proved and bank imposed punishment of dismissal without notice as per service condition applicable to the workman.
He also argued that judicial review had limited scope for the Tribunal and Tribunal did not act as appellate court. He
relied on the following case laws:-
Union of India Vs. Parma Nanda 1989 SCC (L&S) 303, Union Bank of India Vs. Vishwa Mohan 1998 (4)
SCC 310 1998 LIC 2514, SBI Vs. Bela Bagchi 2005 SCC (L&S) 940 and Syed T.A. Vs. Naqshbandi Vs. State
of JK 2003 SCC(L&S) 1151= (2003) 9 SCC 592, State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur Vs Nemichand, Civil
Appeal No. 5861 of 2007, SC dated 01.03.2011, Regional Manager, U.P.S.R.T.C. Vs Hotilal, HP RTC Vs.
Hukumchand 2009 2 SCC (L&S) 615, Mihir Kumar Hazara Vs. LIC (2017) 2 SCC (L&S) 875, Deputy
Commissioner Vs. J. Hussain (2013) 2 SCC (L&S) 833 and SBI Vs. Samarendra Kishore 1994 SCC (S&S)
687, in which following legal principles are laid down:-
i.
It is now well settled that the courts will not act as an appellate court and reassess the evidence led in
the domestic enquiry, nor interfere on the ground that another view is possible on the material on
record.
ii.
Therefore, courts will not interfere with findings of fact recorded in departmental enquires, except
where such findings are based on no evidence or where they are clearly perverse. The test to find out
perversity is to see whether a Tribunal acting reasonably could have arrived at such conclusion or
finding, on the material on record. Courts will however interfere with the findings in disciplinary
matters, if principles of natural justice or statutory regulations have been violated or if the order is
found to be arbitrary, capricious, malafide or based on extraneous considerations.
iii.
When a court is considering whether punishment of ‘termination from service’ imposed upon a bank
employee is shockingly excessive or disproportionate to the gravity of the proved misconduct, the loss
of confidence in the employee will be an important and relevant factor.
iv.
That having regard to the gravity of the established misconduct, the punishing authority had the power
and jurisdiction to impose punishment.
v.
Legal position would establish that the disciplinary authority, and on appeal the appellate authority,
being fact-finding authorities have exclusive power to consider the evidence with a view to maintain
discipline. They are invested with the discretion to impose appropriate punishment keeping in view
the magnitude or gravity of the misconduct.
vi
The position in our country, in administrative law, where no fundamental freedoms as aforesaid are
involved, is that the courts/tribunals will only play a secondary role while the primary judgment as to
reasonableness will remain with the executive or administrative authority.
4340
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
vii.
Court interfered with the punishment only after coming to the conclusion that the punishment was in
outrageous defiance of logic and was shocking.
viii.
If the charged employee holds a position of trust where honesty and integrity are inbuilt requirements
of functioning, it would not be proper to deal with the matter leniently. Misconduct in such cases has
to be dealt with iron hands.
ix.
Misrepresentation itself amounts to fraud, and further held fraudulent misrepresentation is called deceit
and consists in lending a man into damage by willfully or recklessly causing him to believe and act on
falsehood.
x.
If the initial action is not in consonance with law, the subsequent conduct of a party cannot sanctify the
same.
xi.
“Having regard to the seriousness of the charges coupled with virtually…………………………
punishment of dismissal was proportionate to misconduct warranting no leniency”
xii.
“Merely because in opinion of Court lesser punishment would have been more appropriate, cannot be a
ground to interfere with discretion of departmental authorities”.
xiii.
“Supply of copy to the charges employee-Cases where punishment was imposed ……………….. Non-
supply of the copy to the respondent held on facts, did not invalidate the enquiry”.
9.
Now I will discuss the evidence with reference to the argument of the workman. Workman in para no. 16 and
18 of his statement, admitted that, charge sheet was received on 09.10.2003 and he filed reply on 13.12.2003 by letter
Exhibit W-7, in which, he admitted that, he know Mr. L.S. Sharma and he had given money for depositing in RD
account and furnished the entry on pass book and by mistaken, he had forgotten to deposit the money in RD account at
the same day. He has also accepted that, Mr. Sharma gave him Rs. 4000/- due to relationship.
10.
The workman in para 21 also admitted that, he received second show cause notice alongwith the copy of the
departmental enquiry report but he did not submit any reply to that show cause notice. He was also given an
opportunity for personal hearing. He also filed an appeal against the punishment, which was dismissed.
11.
On this admission management counsel relied on the following case law:- Chairman & Managing Director
V.S.P. Vs. Gopal Raju Sri Prabhakara Hari Babu (2008) 2 SCC(L&S) 311 and Himachal Pradesh Road Transport Vs.
Hukumchand (2009) 2 SCC (L&S) 615 in which it was held that (1) “Held, detailed enquiry need not be held- Penalty
based on respondent’s admission that he unauthorisedly absented, was valid in view of the Evidence Act, 1872, S.58”.
(2) “Employee’s own admission of misconduct- Enquiry in such an eventuality, held not necessary- Administrative
Law – Natural justice”.
12.
On the perusal of the record it appears that the departmental enquiry was conducted properly and sufficient
opportunity was given to the workman on behalf of the management. In my opinion there was no legal defect in the
departmental enquiry.
13.
As far as quantum of punishment is concerned it is well settled that the disciplinary authority and appellate
authority being the fact finding authority. So this Tribunal is not an appellate authority i.e. Tribunal will only play
secondary roll while the primary judgment as to reasonableness will remain with the executive or administrative
authority. It is also clear from the above case law that jurisdiction of the Tribunal is very limited and its power to
interfere with disciplinary matters is also limited. It is also laid down in the case law that Tribunal cannot set aside a
well reasoned order only on sympathy or sentiments. It is also laid down that the superior court only in some cases
invoke doctrine of proportionality if decision of an employer is found within the legal parameter, the jurisdiction
would ordinarily not be invoked when misconduct stand proved.
14.
In view of the discussion made above and the materials on record, it is found that there is no scope to interfere
with the order of the punishment of dismissal passed against the workman from services with superannuation benefits
i.e. (P.F/Gratuity as would be due otherwise under Rules and Regulations prevailing at the relevant time without
disqualification for future employment as per Para 6 (d) of the Memorandum of Settlement dated 10.04.2002 for
Workmen staff as per document Exhibit W-III). Hence, it is ordered:-
ORDER
The action of the management of State Bank of India to discharge Shri Dnyandeo Niwrutti Patil from
the service is legal and justified. The quantum of punishment imposed upon him is proportionate to the
misconduct so alleged. The workman is not entitled to any relief.
S. S. GARG, Presiding Officer
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940
4341
ubZ fnYyh] 20 twu] 2018
dk-vk- 979.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj Js;l
xzkeh.k cSad ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] dkuiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 80@2013) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 20-
06-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&12011@48@2012&vkbZvkj (ch&I)º
jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 20th June, 2018
S.O. 979.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 80/2013) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Kanpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Shreyas Gramin
Bank and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 20.06.2018.
[No. L-12011/48/2012-IR (B-I)]
RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRI SHUBHENDRA KUMAR, HJS PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOR COURT, KANPUR
ID No. 80 of 2013
Shri R P Singh
Member WC, UP Bank Workers’ Organization,
3/13, Mathura Nagar.
VS
The Chairman,
Shreyas Gramin Bank,
Head Office, Diggi Road,
ALIGARH(U.P)-202001
AWARD
1.
Central Govt. Mol, New Delhi, vide notification no. L-12011/48/2012-IR (B-1) dated 20.06.13, has referred the
following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal.
2.
Whether the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank, Aligarh has discriminated the provisions of Regional Rural
Bank (Officers & Staff Recruitment & Promotion) Rules, 2010 by recruiting and promoting the officers/staff in
the Bank in accordance with old Rules, 1998 even after existence of the New Rules? And if so, what action
would be proposed against the management to provide relief to affected candidates.”
3.
In short the case set up by the union is that the management in supersession of earlier rules regarding
Appointment and Promotion of officers and employees, Rules, 1998, has framed (Appointment and Promotion
of officers and employees) Rules, 2000 which was duly notified by the Government of India in its official
gazette dated 13.07.2010. The Board of Directors of the Bank in its meeting dated 29.09.2010 has adopted these
rules. It is also alleged that the Chairman, Shreyas Gramin Bank in its circular dated 25.09.2010 has clearly
mentioned that these rules have come into force from the date of their publication and it is therefore, clarified
that any further recruitment and promotion shall be conducted as per these rules. It is also alleged that in the
existence of Rules 2010, Rules framed in the year 1998 has lost its significance. The Chairman of the bank to
fulfill his personal interest by invoking the rules framed in the year 1998 which is said to be not in existence in
an illegal manner, has taken an illegal decision and issued a circular dated 10.02.11 which has adversely
affected the interest of employees and officers of Shreyas Gramin Bank. Union has also cited certain
provision of Appointment and Promotion of Officers and Employees Rules, 1998 and 2010. It is also stated that
the management before Hon’ble High Court has filed an affidavit wherein it is stated as to how recruitment and
promotions of the officers and employees is to be done on the basis of post assessed by the management which
smacks with biasness and malafide intention of the management. Management has appointed and promoted the
4342
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
officers and employees in the bank on whimsical grounds according to Rules 1998, which is illegal and non-est
in the eye of law, therefore, and on the basis of above it has been prayed that the officers and employees those
have been promoted in accordance with Appointment & Promotion of officers and employees, Rules, 1998
instead of Appointment & Promotion of officers and employees, Rules, 2010, being illegal is liable to turned
down.
4.
Manageme has filed their reply in which it is alleged that Shreyas Gramin Bank is sponsored bank of Bank of
India and Canara Bank and now is known as Gramin Bank Aryavart. Central Government is the appropriate
authority to frame the rules regarding appointment and promotion in Regional Gramin Banks in consultation
with the sponsor bank and NABARD and according the Government of India in exercise of powers under
section 29 of RRB Act, framed appointment and promotion rules 2010 by superseding earlier rules framed in
the year 1998 and the same were published by the Government in the Gazette of India dated 13.07.10. The
management has categorically denied the averments made by the union in paragraph no.1 to 7. As per guide line
issued by the Government, bank made manpower assessment for creation of vacancies as on 31.03.10 and
submitting the same for vetting by the sponsor bank which was approved by the sponsor bank vide letter dated
08.12.2010. On the basis of communication issued by the Government of India, it was clarified that the
vacancies which existed prior to the publication of new rules would be filled as per rules which existed at the
relevant time, the sponsor bank advised to fill up the vacancies as per promotion rules 1998 and the matter was
put up before he Board which permitted to fill up the vacancies as pr Promotion Rules 1998, as the vacancies
existed on 31.03.2010. It is also stated that the Board ma in consultation with its sponsor bank determine the
number of vacancies in each category of posts to be filled up. After clearance by Board, the management started
appointment and promotions of officers and employees category wise to fill up the vacant post and after holding
written test and interview for promotion to Officer Grade I list of successful candidates were communicated by
circular no.39/11. The selection of candidates was made strictly as per provisions of appointment and promotion
rules 1998.
5.
Lastly it is alleged that the action of the management is in accordance with the provisions of appointment and
promotions of officers and employees rules 1998, and no illegality has been committed by the management,
therefore, it is prayed that the claim of the union being devoid of merit is liable to be rejected.
6.
Union has not filed rejoinder.
7.
Management has filed photocopies of 8 documents per list dated 20.02.18, whereas no document has been filed
by the union in support of its case.
8.
None appeared on behalf of worker to submit arguments; I have heard the AR for the worker & perused the
record.
9.
It is pertinent to mention that by a bare perusal of the entire record it is evident that as no evidence in support of
the claim petition has been adduced by the union, management also preferred not to lead any evidence as it is
the claimant union who is highly burdened to prove its case by adducing material and relevant evidence as is
required under law and since the union has completely failed to discharge their obligation to prove their claim,
the reference is bound to be answered against the Union holding that the union is not entitled for any relief for
want of evidence and proof.
10.
There is yet another aspect of the matter to be considered by the tribunal. From the pleadings of the union it is
amply clear that on the basis of assertion made by it, the union is seeking the relief for cancelation of their
promotions and appointment against those selected and promoted employees of the bank who were promoted
by invoking the Appointment and Promotion of Officers and Employees, Rules 1998, but the union has not
made them a party to the present dispute. It is settled legal position that courts are not empowered to grant any
relief to a party against a person who had not been made a party to the dispute. Therefore, from this angle also
the reference is liable to be answered against the Union holding that the union is not entitled for the relief which
has been claimed by it.
11.
Accordingly, the reference is answered in the above terms against the Union and it is held that the union is not
entitled for any relief.
SHUBHENDRA KUMAR, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 20 twu] 2018
dk-vk- 980.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj Hkkjrh;
LVsV cSad ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940
4343
vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky; ua- 1] fnYyh ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 100@2013) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks
20-06-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&12012@26@2012&vkbZvkj (ch&I)º
jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 20th June, 2018
S.O. 980.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 100/2013) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court No. 1, Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank
of India and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 20.06.2018.
[No. L-12012/26/2012-IR (B-I)]
RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE PRESIDING OFFICER: CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR
COURT No.1: ROOM No.511, DWARKA COURT COMPLEX, SECTOR 10, DWARKA, DELHI
ID No. 100/2013
Shri Jagdish P Kanojia,
K.G. I/535, Vikaspuri,
New Delhi
…Workman
Versus
The Deputy General Manager(Operation),
Appellate Authority, State Bank of India,
Local Head Office,
New Delhi
…Managements
AWARD
A reference under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947(in short the Act) was received from the Central Government, Ministry of Labour and Employment for
adjudication vide letter No.L-12012/26/2012-IR(B-I) dated 21.06.2012 for adjudication of an industrial dispute with the
following terms:
‘Whether the action of the management of State Bank of India, New Delhi in imposing the penalty of removal
from service upon Shri Jagdish Prasad Kanojia vide their order dated 17.08.2004 instead of accepting his
resignation dated 13.11.2002 and in not paying terminal benefits to him is legal and justified? To what relief
the workman is entitled ?
2.
Brief facts giving rise to the instant reference are that Shri Jagdish Prasad Kanojia (hereinafter referred to as the
claimant) joined services with State Bank of India (hereinafter referred to as the management ) on 22.07.1980 from
Sports Quota as he was a national level football player. Claimant later on suffered injuries and was under treatment
during the period 2001-02. Surprisingly, without considering anything in empathy, treated the claimant on unauthorized
absence from duties and was ordered to join duties immediately. Claimant was under depression and he was serve with
charge sheet dated 06.07.2002. Due to his ill health the claimant was not in a position to get assistance from his union
or any other official of the bank. Verbal assurance was given by the Disciplinary Authority through officials of the
union to take a lenient view of the matter in case his resignation is submitted by the claimant to the management. He
was also assured that terminal benefits after acceptance of his resignation. Resultantly, his resignation was submitted
by the claimant and the same was not later on accepted and it was stated that enquiry proceedings are pending against
the claimant on account of his unauthorized absence. Thereafter, the claimant again made a request for reconsideration
of his resignation retrospectively but it was of no use. However, claimant was not in a position to either to attend the
enquiry or to attend his duties. His request remained unattended. Finally, the claimant received order dated
17.08.2004 removing him from service with effect from 03.05.2001. Pension of the claimant was not settled. Finally,
a prayer ha been made by the claimant to set aside the departmental proceedings as well as his order of removal.
3.
Management has contested the case by filing written statement wherein preliminary objections have been taken
that the reference is hopelessly time barred as the claimant was removed from serviced on 03.05.2001 and reference
was raised belatedly in 2013. On merits, the management has denied most of the averments and it has been alleged that
charge sheet dated 06.07.2002 for his unauthorized absence was issued to the claimant . No assurance was given by the
4344
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Assistant General Manager regarding acceptance of resignation or for payment of terminal benefits to the claimant.
Commensurating with the gravity of misconduct, claimant was imposed punishment of ‘removal without notice’ in
terms of Bipartite Settlement vide orders dated 17.08.2004. Claimant has not made any reference against the enquiry
report or orders of the Disciplinary Authority and he tendered his resignation on 13.11.2002 when the departmental
enquiry was pending against him. His resignation was not accepted by the competent authority Finally, a prayer has
been made for dismissal of the reference.
4.
Against this factual background, this Tribunal on the pleadings of the parties, framed the following issues:
(i)
Whether enquiry conducted against the claimant was just, fair and proper?
(ii)
Whether punishment awarded to the claimant commensurate to his misconduct?
(iii) As in terms of reference.
5.
Issue No.(i) was treated as preliminary issue as it elated to the departmental enquiry. Both parties were granted
opportunity to adduce evidence. However, only the claimant has filed his affidavit Ex.WW1/A and affidavit of
Ms.Radha Kanojia, Ex.WW2/A and Shri Kanojia, WW1 also tendered in evidence documents Ex.WW1/1 to
Ex.WW1/4. I shall be referring to these document during the course of my discussion. Management has not adduced
any evidence in support of the allegations contained in charge sheet dated 16.07.2002. Record of the case shows that
the management was accorded several opportunities to adduce evidence but management failed to put in its appearance
and hence management was proceeded ex-parte on 07.03.2017. Thereafter, the said order was set aside by this
Tribunal vide order dated 31.07.2017. Despite setting aside of the previous order, more than six opportunities were
granted to the management to bring evidence on the domestic enquiry and finally Shri Inderjit Singh, vide his statement
dated 17.01.2018 stated that the management does not want to adduce evidence on the preliminary issue and would like
to straightaway advance arguments on the preliminary issue. It is pertinent to note here that during pendency of the
proceedings before this Tribunal, the claimant Shri J.P. Kanojia expired and application was made before this Tribunal
for bring on record legal heirs of Shri Kanojia, which was allowed by this Tribunal vide order dated 10.04.2018.
Before his death, Shri J.P. Kanojia , the claimant herein, entered the witness box and was examined as WW1 and his
affidavit is Ex.WW1/A. He has also relied on certain documents.
6.
The main question before this Tribunal is whether the domestic enquiry conducted against the claimant herein
which finally resulted in his removal vide order dated 17.08.2004 is fair and has been conducted in accordance with
principles of natural justice or not. At this stage, it is pertinent to mention here that copy of charge sheet has not been
filed by the management, much less the proceedings of the enquiry.
7.
Admittedly, the claimant has not filed any reply to the charge sheet and claimant has categorically stated that an
assurance was given to him by the senior officials of the bank that in case he tenders his resignation, he would be paid
all his terminal benefits, including his pensionary benefits. It was also urged that the management has backed out of
its promise and taking undue advantage of the position of the claimant has passed order of ‘removal from service’
against him.
8.
Shri Inderjit Singh, A/R for the management urged that since the claimant has not participated in the enquiry
proceedings nor filed any reply or tendered any evidence during the course of domestic enquiry, as such allegations
made in the charge sheet stands proved. It has been fairly conceded by the learned A/R for the management that
proceedings of enquiry has not been filed on court record, however, report of the Enquiry Officer has been filed on
record. It was further submitted that resignation was submitted on 13.11.2002 by the claimant. However, the same
was not accepted by the competent authority in view of the pendency of the domestic enquiry against the workman.
Finally, order of ‘removal from service’ was passed against the claimant on 13.08.2004. Learned A/R for the
management has conceded in all fairness that no show cause was served on the claimant.
9.
Now, the main question which arises for consideration before this Tribunal is whether the enquiry has been
conducted in a fair manner and the same is in consonance with principles of natural justice. Apparently, the claimant
has not participated in the departmental enquiry and everything has been done by the management at behind the back of
the claimant. However, law is clear that even if a delinquent official has been proceeded ex-parte by the management
in the departmental proceedings, still it is incumbent upon the management to prove the charges leveled against the
delinquent official as required under the law. Even if an employee refuses to participate in the enquiry, the employer
cannot straightaway dismiss him but he must hold an ex-parte enquiry where evidence must be led. I find support to
this view of mine in the judgement of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Saroj Kumar
Sinha (2010) 2 SCC 772, wherein it is held as under:
“An inquiry Officer acting in a quasi judicial authority is in the position of an independent adjudicator. He is not
supposed to ne a representative of the department/disciplinary authority/Government. His function is to
examine the evidence presented by the Department, even in the absence of the delinquent official to see as to
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940
4345
whether the unrebutted evidence is sufficient to hold that the charges are proved. In the present case, the
aforesaid has not been observed. Since no oral evidence has been examined, the documents have not been
proved and could not have been taken into consideration to conclude that the charges have been proved against
the respondents.’
10.
To buttress his submissions, the A/R for the management relied on the judgement of the Apex Court in New
India Assurance Co. Ltd vs S.M.I. Kazim (2001) LLR 825 and J.P. Sharma vs. Punjab National Bank (1996) LLR 92.
I have carefully gone through both the judgements relied upon by the management. Ratio of the above rulings is not
applicable to the controversy on hand merely because the claimant has not participated in the enquiry or the
proceedings were held ex-parte in the domestic enquiry would not mean that the charge sheet served on the claimant
stands ipso facto proved. As discussed above, management is required to adduce evidence in view of the ratio in Saroj
Kumar Sinha case (supra).
11.
In the case on hand, management has not examined the Enquiry Officer or any other official so as to prove the
domestic enquiry. To my mind, merely because the claimant herein has not joined the domestic proceedings, that
would not mean that allegations against the claimant stands proved. Claimant had given his resignation vide letter
dated 15.06.2004 Ex.WW1/3. Thereafter, as is clear from letter Ex.WW1/4, the Assistant General Manager
recommended that resignation of the claimant be accepted in terms of para 6(b) of the Memorandum of Settlement of
Disciplinary Proceedings dated 10.04.2002. Ex.WW1/2 is the letter of the Enquiry Officer wherein copy of enquiry
report was forwarded to the claimant for making his representation/submission, if any on the same. It is clear from
perusal of the proceedings conducted by the Enquiry Officer that the claimant was not present during the course of
enquiry though registered letter was sent to the claimant after launching of the proceedings against him. However, the
enquiry report is silent as to who were the witnesses who were examined so as to prove the allegations made in the
charge sheet served on the claimant. Enquiry Officer has blindly accepted the allegations made in the charge sheet for
the simple reason that the claimant has not participated in the departmental proceedings. As discussed above, it was
incumbent upon the management to have prima facie to have proved the allegations contained in the charge sheet, as
required under the law. Further, it was also imperative to have examined management witness so as to prove
unauthorized absence of the claimant during the relevant period.
12.
There is another aspect of the matter which cannot be ignored. Management has admittedly not filed record of
proceedings of enquiry before this Court. Management has also not examined any witness before this Tribunal though
several opportunities were given to the management. Resultantly, evidence adduced by the claimant remains un-
rebutted. There is considerable force in the submissions raised on behalf of the claimant that due to submission of his
resignation, he was given an impression that the same would be accepted by the competent authority and terminal
benefits would be paid to him. It is not out of place to mention here that the claimant has now expired on 17.03.2018
and is survived by his wife Ms.Radha Kanojia, and daughters Ms.Varsha Kumar & Ms.Ritu Kumar.
13.
It has been held in the case of Kurukshetra University Vs. Priti Singh (2018) Lab.IC 1437 and Kanga Co-
operative Bank vs Seema Sharma (2018) LLR 231 that examination of the Enquiry Officer or any other employee who
is familiar with the enquiry proceedings is essential so as to prove the allegations of misconduct against the employee.
If the Enquiry Officer or any other employee has not been examined as a witness to prove the enquiry proceedings, the
enquiry proceedings in that eventuality are liable to be set aside. In the above case, management has in fact examined
the Presenting Officer who was not considered to be an independent witness and his evidence was held to be in
violation of principles of natural justice. Situation in the case in hand is even worse. Management has not examined
any independent official or the Enquiry Officer or any other witness so as to prove the domestic enquiry conducted
against the claimant. In such a situation, this Tribunal is left with no choice except to set aside the domestic enquiry
conducted against the claimant. Net result of the above discussion is that the management has failed to prove the
misconduct contained in the charge sheet served on the claimant. It is held that the enquiry has not been conducted in a
fair manner and the same is held to be in violation of principles of natural justice.
14.
I have also gone through the written statement filed by the management in the above case. Management has not
reserved any right to adduce evidence on merits in case findings on the domestic enquiry goes against the management.
Admittedly, in the present case the claimant has expired on 17.03.2018 and no useful purpose would be served even if
permission is granted to the management to adduce evidence on the misconduct/charge sheet framed against the
claimant. It has been held by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Karnataka State Road Transport Vs.
Lakshmidevamma & Another (2001) 5 SCC 433 that when domestic enquiry has been conducted by the management
and the management relies upon the same, it is open to the Tribunal to treat validity of the domestic enquiry as
preliminary issue. Management is also entitled to adduce evidence before this Tribunal in case findings on the
preliminary enquiry ultimately goes against the management. However, such a right is to be reserved by the
management in its reply/pleadings and in case right has not been reserved in the reply filed by the management, in that
eventuality, request is to be made at the earliest possible opportunity to the Tribunal before conclusion of the
proceedings qua the domestic enquiry. Since in the present case when arguments were heard, neither any official of the
4346
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
management nor A/R for the management has appeared, which clearly shows the lackadaisical interest of the
management in conduct of the case. Accordingly, this Tribunal is of the view that the management cannot be given
the right to adduce evidence on merits. As discussed above, no application has been moved on behalf of the
management to adduce evidence and neither the authorized representative nor any official of the management has made
such a request till date. In the case on hand Issue No.2 pertains to the fact as to whether punishment awarded to the
claimant commensurate to his misconduct. To my mind, this issue now pales into insignificance inasmuch as this
Tribunal has held the enquiry to be unfair and against the principles of natural justice. Since the management has not
reserved its right to adduce its evidence on merits in case findings on preliminary goes against the management, in such
a situation, even otherwise, there is no question of granting opportunity to the management to further adduce evidence
on issue No.(2), which has become virtually redundant.
15.
As a sequel to my discussions herein above, it is held that the action of the management of State Bank of India
in imposing penalty of ‘removal from service’ vide order dated 17.08.2004 upon the claimant herein is held to be
illegal and against the provisions of the Act. As such, the said order of ‘Removal from Service’ is hereby set aside. It
is held that the claimant is entitled for all terminal benefits which would have accrued to him had he been alive and in
service. An award is accordingly passed. Let this award be sent to the appropriate Government, as required under
Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, for publication.
Dated : May 24, 2018
A. C. DOGRA, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 20 twu] 2018
dk-vk- 981-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ
¯lxkjsuh dksfy;jht daiuh fyfeVsM ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa
dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 'kqf¼i=k ,ylh 94@2009) dks çdkf'kr djrh
gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 19-06-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&22013@01@2018&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º
jktsUæ flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 20th June, 2018
S.O. 981.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. Corrigendum LC 94/2009) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management
of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 19.06.2018.
[No. L-22013/01/2018-IR (CM-II)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT AT
HYDERABAD
Present : Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer
Dated : the 26th day of April, 2018
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L.C. No. 94/2009
Between :
Sri Ramchetti Srinivas,
S/o Rajamouli,
R/o 17-3-261/1, Dwarakanagar,
Godavarikhani,
Karimnagar District
…Petitioner
AND
The General Manager,
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940
4347
Goleti-I incline, Bellampally,
Adilabad
…Respondent
Appearances :
For the Petitioner
:
M/s. P. Sudha & Venkatesh Dixit, Advocates
For the Respondent
:
Sri S.M. Subhani, Advocate
CORRIGENDUM
The award was passed on 14.12.2017 and was published in the official gazette vide notification File No.
L-22013/01/2018-IR(C-II)) dated 18.1.2018.
Due to oversight, the name of the Petitioner was wrongly typed as “Sri K. Narsinga Rao”
Instead of,
“Sri Ramchetti Srinivas” five times
at 2nd page-1st Para-1st Line; at 5th page-6.I para-3rd line;
at 8th page-9th para-4th line; at 8th page 10th para-2nd line and
at 9th page-1st para of the “ORDER”-3rd line
MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 20 twu] 2018
dk-vk- 982-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ
¯lxkjsuh dksfy;jht daiuh fyfeVsM ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa
dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k ,ylh 95@2008) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks
dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 19-06-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&22013@01@2018&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º
jktsUæ flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 20th June, 2018
S.O. 982.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. LC 95/2008) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s.
Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 19.06.2018.
[No. L-22013/01/2018-IR (CM-II)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT AT
HYDERABAD
Present : Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer
Dated : the 25th day of April, 2018
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L.C. No. 95/2008
Between :
Sri Chilukala Rajendra Prasad,
S/o Rayamallu,
C/o Smt. A. Sarojana,
Advocate, Flat No.G7,
Rajeshwari Gayatri Sadan,
Opp: Badruka Jr. College for Girls,
Kachiguda, Hyderabad
…Petitioner
4348
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
AND
1.
The General Manager,
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
Mandamarri Area, Mandamarri,
Adilabad District
2.
The Dy. General Manager,
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
MK-4 Incline, Mandamarri Area,
Mandamarri, Adilabad District
…Respondents
Appearances :
For the Petitioner
:
M/s. A. Sarojana & K. Vasudeva Reddy, Advocates
For the Respondent
:
M/s. P.A.V.V.S. Sarma & Vijaya Lakshmi Panguluri, Advocates
AWARD
Sri Chilukala Rajendra Prasad who worked as Badli Filler (who will be referred to as the workman) has filed
this petition under Sec. 2A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 against the Respondents M/s. Singareni Collieries
Company Ltd., seeking for declaring the proceeding No. MMR/PER/D/072/857 dated 7.2.2008 issued by Respondent
No.1 as illegal, arbitrary and to set aside the same consequently directing the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner
into service duly granting all the consequential benefits such as continuity of service, back wages and all other
attendant benefits etc., and such other reliefs as this court may deems fit.
2.
The averments made in the petition in brief are as follows:
The Petitioner was initially appointed as badli filler on 25.9.1990 and he was confirmed as Coal Filler in the
year 1996. He was regular to his duties till the year 2004. But during the year 2005 Petitioner met with a road
accident, due to which his collar bone and fingers fractured, and as such he could not able to work for 44 days during
the year 2005. While the matters stood thus, charge sheet dated 13.5.2006 was issued to the Petitioner by the
Respondents alleging that the Petitioner absented for duty during the year 2005, which amounts to misconduct under
company’s Standing Order No.25.25. Subsequently, one inquiry was conducted and during the time of the enquiry, the
Petitioner was not given any opportunity much less valid in nature to put forth his grievances. Basing on such lopsided
enquiry, the Enquiry Officer held the charges as proved and basing on the erroneous findings of the Enquiry Officer,
the Petitioner was dismissed from service vide order No. MMR/PER/D/072/857 dated 7.2.2008. It is stated that during
the course of the enquiry the Petitioner has categorically stated about his inability to perform his duties regularly
during the year 2005, was only on account of his ill-health. But without considering any of his submissions, the
Petitioner was dismissed from service. It is also stated that the action of the Respondents’ management in dismissing
the Petitioner from service is wholly illegal, arbitrary, violative of the principles of natural justice. The Petitioner has
rendered 18 years of continuous service in the Respondents’ management till his dismissal. The Petitioner approached
the Respondents to consider his case sympathetically, but the management did not pay any heed to it. Therefore, the
Petitioner was constrained to approach this Tribunal to declare the impugned order No. MMR/PER/D/072/857 dated
7.2.2008 issued by the Respondents is illegal and arbitrary and to set aside the same and consequently to direct the
Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner into service duly granting all other attendant benefits such as continuity of
service, back wages etc..
3.
The Respondents filed counter denying the averments made in the petition, with the averments in brief
which runs as follows:
In the counter the Respondents while admitting some of the factual aspects to be true, stated that the Petitioner
was appointed in the Respondents’ company on 25.9.1990 as a Badli Filler and subsequently he was regularized as
Coal filler with effect from 1.9.1995. He was dismissed from service on proved charges of absenteeism, after
conducting a detailed domestic enquiry duly following the principles of natural justice. The Petitioner has attended the
dates fixed for the enquiry and had fully participated in the enquiry. He was given full, fair and reasonable
opportunity to defend himself in the enquiry. The enquiry was conducted purely following the principles of natural
justice. It is stated that basing on the evidence adduced before the Enquiry Officer, the Enquiry Officer submitted his
report holding the charges levelled against the Petitioner was proved. A copy of the enquiry report and the enquiry
proceeding was sent to the Petitioner by way of show cause notice giving him an opportunity to make representation
against the findings of the enquiry report; since the charge levelled against the Petitioner is proved and it was serious
in nature, punishment warranted was dismissal from service. The Disciplinary Authority has gone through the enquiry
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940
4349
proceeding and his past record and found that there was no extenuating circumstances to take a lenient view and lastly,
the Respondents were constrained to dismiss the Petitioner from service. It is stated that in fact the Petitioner was
irregular to his duties and he did not improve his attendance even after issuing charge sheet to him, and after receiving
the show cause notice. It is further stated that the punishment imposed on the Petitioner is justified and legal and as
such the claim petition is liable to be dismissed in limini.
4.
Order passed holding the domestic enquiry conducted by the Respondents as legal and valid, on dated
15.3.2011.
5.
Both the parties have advanced their arguments U/s.11A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 in support of their
claim.
6.
In view of the above facts, the points for determination are:
I.
Whether the action of the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., in imposing the
punishment of dismissal from service to Sri Chilukala Rajendra Prasad is legal and justified?
II.
Whether the Petitioner is entitled for reinstatement into service?
III.
If not, to what other relief he is entitled?
7.
Point No.I: During the course of argument, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner
submitted that due to illness and family problems, the Petitioner could not be able to attend his duty sincerely. Even
in his show cause the Petitioner has mentioned the above facts but it has not been considered during the course of the
enquiry and on account of absenteeism capital punishment of dismissal from service was imposed on the Petitioner.
When the Petitioner has taken a stand that due to his illness, and other family problems he could not be able to attend
his duties regularly and remained absent, the authority should have considered his case while imposing capital
punishment. But the authority has not considered any of the submissions of the Petitioner, and has imposed capital
punishment to the Petitioner when several modes of punishment are enumerated in the company’s Standing Orders.
8.
On the other hand, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents submitted that when the
Petitioner was a chronic absentee and was found guilty of the charges levelled against him, the punishment imposed
by the Respondents’ company is legal and proper. When the Petitioner was not sincere in his duty and failed to
maintain minimum musters in a year he is not entitled to be reinstated into service.
9.
Admittedly, working in the Mines is hazardous and remaining absent is not unusual. In this case, due to ill
health because of accident and other family problems of the Petitioner, he could not be able to regular in his duty,
remained absent in his duties and a proceeding was initiated against him for his absenteeism followed by an enquiry.
In the enquiry, the charges levelled against the Petitioner were proved. For this, capital punishment was imposed.
After dismissal of service, the Petitioner has become jobless and unable to provide a square meal to his family
members. He has already realised his mistake and has taken shelter in the court at the age of 42 years, he is now aged
about 52 years and is searching ways and means to provide bread and butter to his family members. The Petitioner
being an able bodied and energetic man has already realised his mistake and is coming forward to the court at the age
of 50 years to work under the Respondents. In such a circumstances, atleast one chance should be given to him for his
reinstatement into service in order to save his family members. Admittedly several modes of punishment are
enumerated in company’s Standing Orders. The Petitioner is a first offender and has worked about 18 years under the
Respondents. While imposing capital punishment to his employees, the management should think of the condition of
the workers as well as his family members. In this case, the punishment imposed by the Respondents for dismissal of
service of the Petitioner is too harsh. Therefore, it can safely be stated that the action taken by the management in
imposing the punishment of dismissal from service to Sri Chilukala Rajendra Prasad is not legal and justified.
Thus, Point No.I is answered accordingly.
10.
Point Nos. II & III: In Point No.I, it has already been discussed that the punishment of dismissal from service
to Sri Chilukala Rajendra Prasad is not legal and justified. After dismissal of service as stated earlier, when the
Petitioner has already realised his mistake and has come to the court with a prayer for reinstatement into service he
should be given a chance to serve for his family members. After dismissal of service the Petitioner has become jobless
and he being the sole bread earner of his family, is unable to provide a square meal to his family members. In such a
circumstances atleast the Petitioner should be given a chance to maintain his livelihood and to work under the
Respondents’ management. But in this case, the Petitioner has not come to the court soon after his dismissal of service.
In the opinion of this Tribunal the Petitioner is not entitled to get all the relief as claimed in his claim petition. But he is
only entitled to be given a chance to work in the Respondents’ management.
4350
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Thus, Point Nos. II & III are answered accordingly.
ORDER
Proceeding No. MMR/PER/D/072/857 dated 7.2.2008 issued by Respondent No.1 is declared as illegal and is
hereby set aside. It is ordered that the workman Sri Chilukala Rajendra Prasad be taken into service as a fresh
employee i.e., Badli filler in Cat.I, on initial basic pay without back wages and continuity of service, subject to medical
fitness by the company Medical Board and the workman be kept under probation for a period of one year. The
management is also directed to take an undertaking of good behaviour from the workman at the time of his posting.
The Workman can not claim for his posting in the same place, where he was last employed. The workman
shall have to maintain either minimum mandatory 20 musters every month or 190 musters in a year and the
management shall have the right to review the work of the workman in every three months. In the event of any short
fall of attendance during the period of the three months, the service of the workman shall not be terminated and he
will be cautioned to improve his performance by issuing him a warning letter. However, in the event of any shortfall
of attendance during one year of service of the workman, he will be terminated from service without any further notice
and enquiry and in the event of completion of one year of probation satisfactorily, the workman is to continue in
service till the age of attaining superannuation. The management shall consider any forced absenteeism on account of
Mine accidents/ Natural disasters, taking treatment in the company’s hospital, as attendance. All other usual terms
and conditions of appointment will be applicable i.e., transfer, hours of work, day of rest, holidays etc.. to the workman
for appointment afresh.
Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.
Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant and corrected by me on this the 25th day of
April, 2018.
MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer
Appendix of evidence
Witnesses examined for the Petitioner
Witnesses examined for the Respondent
NIL
NIL
Documents marked for the Petitioner
NIL
Documents marked for the Respondent
NIL
ubZ fnYyh] 20 twu] 2018
dk-vk- 983-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ
¯lxkjsuh dksfy;jht daiuh fyfeVsM ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa
dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k ,ylh 85@2008) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks
dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 19-06-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&22013@01@2018&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º
jktsUæ flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 20th June, 2018
S.O. 983.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. LC 85/2008) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s.
Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 19.06.2018.
[No. L-22013/01/2018-IR (CM-II)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940
4351
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT AT
HYDERABAD
Present : Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer
Dated : the 25th day of April, 2018
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L.C. No. 85/2008
Between :
Sri Mukkera Gangaish,
S/o Laxmaiah,
C/o Smt. A. Sarojana,
Advocate, Flat No.G7,
Rajeshwari Gayatri Sadan,
Opp: Badruka Jr. College for Girls,
Kachiguda, Hyderabad
…Petitioner
AND
1.
The General Manager,
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
Mandamarri Area, Mandamarri,
Adilabad District
2.
The Colliery Manager,
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
Kalyanakhani No. 2 Incline, Kalyanakhani,
Adilabad District
…Respondents
Appearances :
For the Petitioner
:
M/s. A. Sarojana & K. Vasudeva Reddy, Advocates
For the Respondent
:
M/s. M.V. Hanumantha Rao, Advocate
AWARD
Sri Mukkera Gangaiah who worked as Badli Filler (who will be referred to as the workman) has filed this
petition under Sec. 2A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 against the Respondents M/s. Singareni Collieries
Company Ltd., seeking for declaring the proceeding No. MMR/KK2/G-035/525 dated 20.2.2003 issued by Respondent
No.2 as illegal, arbitrary and to set aside the same consequently directing the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner
into service duly granting all the consequential benefits such as continuity of service, back wages and all other
attendant benefits etc., and such other reliefs as this court may deems fit.
2.
The averments made in the petition in brief are as follows:
The Petitioner was initially appointed as badli filler in the year 1981 and he was promoted as Coal Filler in the
year 1982. He was regular to his duties till the year 1999. But during the year 2000, the Petitioner suffered with ill
health, as his son was kidnapped by unidentified persons, due to which the Petitioner scared and went on roaming in
search of his son. While the matters stood thus, charge sheet dated 5.8.2001 was issued to the Petitioner by the
Respondents alleging that the Petitioner absented for duty during the year 2000, which amounts to misconduct under
company’s Standing Order No.25.25. Subsequently, one inquiry was conducted and during the time of the enquiry,
the Petitioner was not given any opportunity much less valid in nature to put forth his grievances. Basing on such
lopsided enquiry, the Enquiry Officer held the charges as proved and basing on the erroneous findings of the Enquiry
Officer, the Petitioner was dismissed from service vide order No. MMR/KK2/G-035/525 dated 20.2.2003 . It is stated
that during the course of the enquiry the Petitioner has categorically stated about his inability to perform his duties
regularly during the year 2000, as it was only on account of his ill-health. But without considering any of his
submissions, the Petitioner was dismissed from service. It is also stated that the action of the Respondents’
management in dismissing the Petitioner from service is wholly illegal, arbitrary, violative of the principles of natural
justice. The Petitioner has rendered 21 years of continuous service in the Respondents’ management till his dismissal.
The Petitioner approached the Respondents to consider his case sympathetically, but the management did not pay any
4352
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
heed to it. Therefore, the Petitioner was constrained to approach this Tribunal to declare the impugned order No.
MMR/KK2/G-035/525 dated 20.2.2003 issued by the Respondents is illegal and arbitrary and to set aside the same and
consequently to direct the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner into service duly granting all other attendant benefits
such as continuity of service, back wages etc..
3.
The Respondents filed counter denying the averments made in the petition, with the averments in brief
which runs as follows:
In the counter the Respondents while admitting some of the factual aspects to be true, stated that the Petitioner
was appointed in the Respondents’ company on 22.3.1981 as a Badli Filler. He was dismissed from service on proved
charges of absenteeism, after conducting a detailed domestic enquiry duly following the principles of natural justice.
The Petitioner has attended the dates fixed for the enquiry and had fully participated in the enquiry. He was given
full, fair and reasonable opportunity to defend himself in the enquiry. The enquiry was conducted purely following the
principles of natural justice. It is stated that basing on the evidence adduced before the Enquiry Officer, the Enquiry
Officer submitted his report holding the charges levelled against the Petitioner was proved. A copy of the enquiry
report and the enquiry proceeding was sent to the Petitioner by way of show cause notice giving him an opportunity to
make representation against the findings of the enquiry report; since the charge levelled against the Petitioner is
proved and it was serious in nature, punishment warranted was dismissal from service. The Disciplinary Authority has
gone through the enquiry proceeding and his past record and found that there was no extenuating circumstances to take
a lenient view and lastly, the Respondents were constrained to dismiss the Petitioner from service. It is stated that in
fact the Petitioner was irregular to his duties and he did not improve his attendance even after issuing charge sheet to
him, and after receiving the show cause notice. It is further stated that the punishment imposed on the Petitioner is
justified and legal and as such the claim petition is liable to be dismissed in limini.
4.
In view of the memo filed by the Counsel for the Petitioner conceding the legality and validity of the domestic
enquiry conducted in the present case, the domestic enquiry conducted by the Respondents is held as legal and valid
vide order dated 23.7.2010.
5.
Both the parties have advanced their arguments U/s.11A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 in support of their
claim.
6.
In view of the above facts, the points for determination are:
I.
Whether the action of the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., in imposing the
punishment of dismissal from service to Sri Mukkera Gangaiah is legal and justified?
II.
Whether the Petitioner is entitled for reinstatement into service?
III.
If not, to what other relief he is entitled?
7.
Point No.I: During the course of argument, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner
submitted that due to illness and family problems, the Petitioner could not be able to attend his duty sincerely. Even in
his show cause the Petitioner has mentioned the above facts but it has not been considered during the course of the
enquiry and on account of absenteeism capital punishment of dismissal from service was imposed on the Petitioner.
When the Petitioner has taken a stand that due to his illness, and other family problems he could not be able to attend
his duties regularly and remained absent, the authority should have considered his case while imposing capital
punishment. But the authority has not considered any of the submissions of the Petitioner, and has imposed capital
punishment to the Petitioner when several modes of punishment are enumerated in the company’s Standing Orders.
8.
On the other hand, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents submitted that when the
Petitioner was a chronic absentee and was found guilty of the charges levelled against him, the punishment imposed
by the Respondents’ company is legal and proper. When the Petitioner was not sincere in his duty and failed to
maintain minimum musters in a year he is not entitled to be reinstated in service.
9.
Admittedly, working in the Mines is hazardous and remaining absent is not unusual. In this case, due to ill
health and other family problems of the Petitioner, he could not be able to be regular in his duty, the Petitioner has
remained absent in his duties and a proceeding was initiated against him for his absenteeism followed by an enquiry.
In the enquiry, the charges levelled against the Petitioner were proved. For this, capital punishment was imposed.
After dismissal of service, the Petitioner has become jobless and unable to provide a square meal to his family
members. He has already realised his mistake and has taken shelter in the court at the age of 40 years, he is now aged
about 50 years and is searching ways and means to provide bread and butter to his family members. The Petitioner
being an able bodied and energetic man has already realised his mistake and is coming forward to the court to work in
the mines at the age of 50 years. In such a circumstances, atleast one chance should be given to him for reinstatement
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940
4353
into service in order to save his family members. Admittedly several modes of punishment are enumerated in
company’s Standing Orders. The Petitioner is a first offender and has worked 21 years under the Respondents. While
imposing capital punishment to his employees, the management should think of the condition of the workers as well
as his family members. In this case, the punishment imposed by the Respondents for dismissal of service is too harsh.
Therefore, it can safely be stated that the action taken by the management in imposing the punishment of dismissal
from service to Sri Mukkera Gangaiah is not legal and justified.
Thus, Point No.I is answered accordingly.
10.
Point Nos. II & III: In Point No.I, it has already been discussed that the punishment of dismissal from service
to Sri Mukkera Gangaiah is not legal and justified. After dismissal of service as stated earlier, when the Petitioner
has already realised his mistake and has come to the court with a prayer for reinstatement into service he should be
given a chance to serve for his family members. After dismissal of service the Petitioner has become jobless and he
being the sole bread earner of his family, is unable to provide a square meal to his family members. In such a
circumstances atleast the Petitioner should be given a chance to maintain his livelihood and to work under the
Respondents’ management. But in this case, the Petitioner has not come to the court soon after his dismissal of service.
In the opinion of this Tribunal the Petitioner is not entitled to get all the relief as claimed in his claim petition. But he is
only entitled to be given a chance to work in the Respondents’ management.
Thus, Point Nos. II & III are answered accordingly.
ORDER
Proceeding No. MMR/KK2/G-035/525 dated 20.2.2003 issued by Respondent No.1 is declared as illegal and is
hereby set aside. It is ordered that the workman Sri Mukkera Gangaiah be taken into service as a fresh employee i.e.,
Badli filler in Cat.I, on initial basic pay without back wages and continuity of service, subject to medical fitness by the
company Medical Board and the workman be kept under probation for a period of one year. The management is also
directed to take an undertaking of good behaviour from the workman at the time of his posting.
The Workman can not claim for his posting in the same place, where he was last employed. The workman
shall have to maintain either minimum mandatory 20 musters every month or 180 musters in a year and the
management shall have the right to review the work of the workman in every three months. In the event of any short
fall of attendance during the period of the three months, the service of the workman shall not be terminated and he
will be cautioned to improve his performance by issuing him a warning letter. However, in the event of any shortfall
of attendance during one year of service of the workman, he will be terminated from service without any further notice
and enquiry and in the event of completion of one year of probation satisfactorily, the workman is to continue in
service till the age of attaining superannuation. The management shall consider any forced absenteeism on account of
Mine accidents/ Natural disasters, taking treatment in the company’s hospital, as attendance. All other usual terms
and conditions of appointment will be applicable i.e., transfer, hours of work, day of rest, holidays etc.. to the workman
for appointment afresh.
Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.
Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant and corrected by me on this the 25th day of
April, 2018.
MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer
Appendix of evidence
Witnesses examined for the Petitioner
Witnesses examined for the Respondent
NIL
NIL
Documents marked for the Petitioner
NIL
Documents marked for the Respondent
NIL
4354
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ubZ fnYyh] 20 twu] 2018
dk-vk- 984-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ
¯lxkjsuh dksfy;jht daiuh fyfeVsM ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa
dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k ,ylh 59@2007) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks
dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 19-06-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&22013@01@2018&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º
jktsUæ flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 20th June, 2018
S.O. 984.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. LC 59/2007) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s.
Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 19.06.2018.
[No. L-22013/01/2018-IR (CM-II)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT AT
HYDERABAD
Present : Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer
Dated : the 26th day of April, 2018
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L.C. No. 59/2007
Between :
Sri Md. Abdul Kareem,
S/o Md. Ismail,
C/o Smt. A. Sarojana,
Advocate, Flat No.G7,
Ground Floor, Rajeshwari Gayatri Sadan,
Opp: Badruka Jr. College for Girls,
Kachiguda, Hyderabad
…Petitioner
AND
1.
The General Manager,
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
RG-I Area, Godavarikhani,
Karimnagar District
2.
The Superintendent of Mines,
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
GDK-5A Incline, Godavarikhani,
Karimnagar District
…Respondents
Appearances :
For the Petitioner
:
M/s. A. Sarojana & K. Vasudeva Reddy, Advocates
For the Respondent
:
M/s. P.A.V.V.S. Sarma & Vijaya Lakshmi Panguluri, Advocates
AWARD
Sri Md. Abdul Kareem who worked Badli Filler (who will be referred to as the workman) has filed this petition
under Sec. 2A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 against the Respondent M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
seeking to declare proceeding dated 16.1.1995 issued by the Respondents as illegal, arbitrary and to set aside the same
consequently directing the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner into service duly granting all the consequential
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940
4355
benefits such as continuity of service, back wages and all other attendant benefits etc., and such other reliefs as this
court may deems fit.
2.
The averments made in the petition in brief are as follows:
The Petitioner was initially joined the services of the Respondents’ company on 28/29.9.1994 under
compassionate grounds by the 1st Respondent and was instructed to report before the 2nd Respondent. Accordingly, the
Petitioner reported before the 2nd Respondent and performed his duties to the best of his ability. However, all on a
sudden, without issuing any notice or without affording any opportunity of being heard the Petitioner was dismissed
from service by the 2nd Respondent vide order dated 16.1.1995. It is also stated that the action of the Respondents’
management in dismissing the Petitioner from service is wholly illegal, arbitrary, and violative of the principles of
natural justice. The Petitioner approached the Respondents to consider his case sympathetically, but the managements
did not pay any heed to it. Therefore, the Petitioner was constrained to approach this Tribunal to declare the impugned
order dated 16.1.1995 issued by the Respondents as illegal and arbitrary and to set aside the same and consequently to
direct the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner into service duly granting all other attendant benefits such as
continuity of service, back wages etc..
3.
The Respondents filed counter denying the averments made in the petition, with the averments in brief
which runs as follows:
In the counter the Respondents while admitting some of the factual aspects to be true, stated that the Petitioner
was appointed in the Respondents’ company on 28/29.9.1994 as a dependant of his father Sri Md. Ismail, Ex-M & R
mazdoor, Auto workshop, Bellampalli Area who retired under Voluntary Retirement Scheme on health grounds.
Accordingly, the Petitioner reported on 3.10.1994 with the relevant terms and conditions of appointment order which
runs as follows:
“Accordingly, you are hereby appointed as Badli Filler on piece rated wages against absenteeism
vacancies of Fillers at Gdk No.5A Incline with immediate effect. You will be shown work as and when available
at Gdk No.5A Incline. This does not confer any right on job in the company. You have to attend to Gdk No.5A
Incline daily to find out work in place of permanent fillers who are temporarily absent.
In case your work, attendance and conduct are found to be unsatisfactory, your services are liable for
termination.”
The Petitioner had reported for duty on 3.10.1994 and worked only nine days during the period 3.10.1994 to
31.12.1994. His work and attendance were very poor. Hence, as per terms and conditions of the appointment order he
was terminated from the services of the Respondents’ company vide order No.Gdk/5A/95/2R/133 dated 16.1.1995. It
is further stated that the punishment imposed on the Petitioner is justified and legal and as such the claim petition is
liable to be dismissed in limini.
4.
Either the Petitioner or the Respondent have not adduced evidence.
5.
I have already heard from the parties in this matter.
6.
In view of the above facts, the points for determination are:
I.
Whether the action of the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., in imposing the
punishment of dismissal from service to Sri Md. Abdul Kareem is legal and justified?
II.
Whether the Petitioner is entitled for reinstatement into service?
III.
If not, to what other relief he is entitled?
7.
Point No.I: The Advocate for the Petitioner submitted that the Petitioner was initially joined in the service of
the Respondent company on 28/29.9.1994 under compassionate grounds by 1st Respondent and was instructed to report
before the 2nd Respondent. Accordingly, the Petitioner reported before the 2nd Respondent and performed his duties
there. He also submitted that the Petitioner performed his duties to the best of his ability. But, all on a sudden,
without issuing any notice or without affording any opportunity of being heard the Petitioner was dismissed from
service by the 2nd Respondent vide order dated 16.1.1995. He also contended that the dismissal of the Petitioner from
service is wholly illegal, arbitrary, and violative of the principles of natural justice. The Petitioner approached the
Respondents to consider his case sympathetically but the Respondents’ management did not pay any heed to it.
Therefore, the Petitioner was constrained to approach this Tribunal to declare the impugned order dated 16.1.1995
issued by the Respondents is as illegal, arbitrary and to set aside the same.
8.
On the other hand, the advocate for the Respondent while reiterating the contentions raised in the counter
argued that the Petitioner was appointed in the Respondents’ company on 28/29.9.1994 as a dependant employee of his
father Sri Md. Ismail, Ex-M & R mazdoor, Auto workshop, Bellampalli Area who retired under Voluntary Retirement
4356
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Scheme on health grounds. Accordingly, the Petitioner reported on 3.10.1994 with the following relevant terms and
conditions of appointment order, “you are hereby appointed as Badli Filler on piece rated wages against
absenteeism vacancies of Fillers at Gdk No.5A Incline with immediate effect. You will be shown work as and
when available at Gdk No.5A Incline. This does not confer any right on job in the company. You have to
attend to Gdk No.5A Incline daily to find out work in place of permanent fillers who are temporarily absent. In
case your work, attendance and conduct are found to be unsatisfactory, your services are liable for
termination.” He further argued that in view of the above conditional order of appointment, the Petitioner had
reported for duty on 3.10.1994 and worked only nine days during the period from 3.10.1994 to 31.12.1994. The work
and attendance of the Petitioner were very poor. Hence, as per the terms and conditions of the appointment order the
Petitioner was terminated from services of the Respondents’ company vide order No.Gdk/5A/95/2R/133 dated
16.1.1995. He also contended that the punishment imposed on the Petitioner is justified and legal and needs no
interference.
9.
On consideration of the rival contentions of both the sides it is noticed that the Petitioner has no where stated
how many days he worked in the office of the Respondents’ management. He has only mentioned that he performed
his duties to the best of his ability. It is not known how he justified his work that he performed his duty to the best of
his ability. When the Respondents’ have clearly stated that during the period from 3.10.1994 to 31.12.1994, the
Petitioner has only worked for 9 days it means in between 3 months, the Petitioner has only worked for 9 days. Further
no where the Petitioner has stated that during the above period, he was not assigned any duty to perform. If the
Petitioner has worked for only 9 days within a period of three months how he justified himself that he has performed
his duties to the best of his ability and to the satisfaction of his authority. In fact another aspect needs to be noted. The
Petitioner was a young man and a new entry to the Respondents’ organization. Regard being heard to his age and
experience in the work place, it was expected of him to maintain discipline act with responsibility, perform his duty
with sincerity and serve the institution with honesty. This kind of conduct can not be countenanced as it creates a
concavity in the work culture and ushers in indiscipline in an organization. The Petitioner has been given appointment
with a conditional order i.e., in case his work, attendance and conduct are found to be unsatisfactory, his services are
liable for termination. In the instant case when the Petitioner has worked only for 9 days within a period of three
months, it is obvious to say that the work of the Petitioner was not satisfactory and he has been rightly terminated from
services. If such type of workmen will be allowed to work in an organization, it management can not be flourished. In
such a circumstances, it can safely be held that the management has rightly passed the order for the termination of the
Petitioner. Thus, the action of the management is justified in imposing the punishment of dismissal from service to Sri
Md. Abdul Kareem.
Thus, Point No.I is answered accordingly.
10.
Point Nos. II & III: In Point No.I it has already been stated that the action of the management of M/s.
Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., in imposing the punishment of dismissal from service to Sri Md. Abdul Kareem is
legal and justified. In view of the above findings, the Petitioner is not entitled for reinstatement into service and also
not entitled for any other relief.
Thus, Point Nos. II & III are answered accordingly.
ORDER
The action of the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., in imposing the punishment of
dismissal from service to Sri Md. Abdul Kareem is legal and justified. Hence, the Petitioner workman is not entitled to
any relief as prayed for.
Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.
Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant and corrected by me on this the 26th day of
April, 2018.
MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer
Appendix of evidence
Witnesses examined for the Petitioner
Witnesses examined for the Respondent
NIL
NIL
Documents marked for the Petitioner
NIL
Documents marked for the Respondent
NIL
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940
4357
ubZ fnYyh] 20 twu] 2018
dk-vk- 985-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ
¯lxkjsuh dksfy;jht daiuh fyfeVsM ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa
dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k ,ylh 45@2008) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks
dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 19-06-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&22013@01@2018&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º
jktsUæ flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 20th June, 2018
S.O. 985.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. LC 45/2008) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s.
Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 19.06.2018.
[No. L-22013/01/2018-IR (CM-II)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT AT
HYDERABAD
Present : Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer
Dated : the 25th day of April, 2018
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L.C. No. 45/2008
Between :
Sri Parvatha Srinivas,
S/o Parvatha Lingaiah,
C/o Smt. A. Sarojana,
Advocate, Flat No.G7,
Rajeshwari Gayatri Sadan,
Opp: Badruka Jr. College for Girls,
Kachiguda, Hyderabad
…Petitioner
AND
1.
The General Manager,
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
Bellampally Area, Bellampally, Adilabad District
2.
The Superintendent of Mines,
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
Goleti No.1 Incline, Bellampally Area,
Bellampally, Adilabad District
…Respondents
Appearances :
For the Petitioner
:
M/s. A. Sarojana & K. Vasudeva Reddy, Advocates
For the Respondent
:
Sri M.V. Hanumantha Rao, Advocate
AWARD
Sri Parvatha Srinivas who worked as Badli Filler (who will be referred to as the workman) has filed this
petition under Sec. 2A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 against the Respondents M/s. Singareni Collieries
Company Ltd., seeking for declaring the proceeding No. BPA/PER/129/3585 dated 25.12.2007 issued by Respondent
No.1 as illegal, arbitrary and to set aside the same consequently directing the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner
into service duly granting all the consequential benefits such as continuity of service, back wages and all other
attendant benefits etc., and such other reliefs as this court may deems fit.
4358
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2.
The averments made in the petition in brief are as follows:
The Petitioner was initially appointed as badli filler in the year 2005. During the year 2006 the Petitioner and
his family members fell sick due to Chiken Guniya, Knee Pains and other family problems. While the matters stood
thus, charge sheet dated 12.1.2007 was issued to the Petitioner by the Respondents alleging that the Petitioner absented
for duty during the year 2006, which amounts to misconduct under company’s Standing Order No.25.25. The Petitioner
submitted his explanation to the charge sheet. Subsequently, one inquiry was conducted and during the time of the
enquiry, the Petitioner was not given any opportunity much less valid in nature to put forth his grievances. Basing on
such lopsided enquiry, the Enquiry Officer held the charges as proved and basing on the erroneous findings of the
Enquiry Officer, the Petitioner was dismissed from service vide order No. BPA/PER/129/3585 dated 25.12.2007. It is
stated that during the course of the enquiry the Petitioner has categorically stated about his inability to perform his
duties regularly during the year 2006, as it was only on account of his ill-health. But without considering any of his
submissions, the Petitioner was dismissed from service. It is also stated that the action of the Respondents management
in dismissing the Petitioner from service is wholly illegal, arbitrary, violative of the principles of natural justice. The
Petitioner has rendered 1½ years continuous service in the Respondents’ management till the date of his dismissal.
The Petitioner approached the Respondents to consider his case sympathetically, but the management did not pay any
heed to it. Therefore, the Petitioner was constrained to approach this Tribunal to declare the impugned order No.
BPA/PER/129/3585 dated 25.12.2007 issued by the Respondents is illegal and arbitrary and to set aside the same and
consequently to direct the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner into service duly granting all other attendant benefits
such as continuity of service, back wages etc..
3.
The Respondents filed counter denying the averments made in the petition, with the averments in brief
which runs as follows:
In the counter the Respondents while admitting some of the factual aspects to be true, stated that the Petitioner
was appointed in the Respondents’ company on 18.10.2005 as a Badli Filler. He was dismissed from service on
proved charges of absenteeism, after conducting a detailed domestic enquiry duly following the principles of natural
justice. The Petitioner has attended the dates fixed for the enquiry and had fully participated in the enquiry. He was
given full, fair and reasonable opportunity to defend himself in the enquiry. The enquiry was conducted purely
following the principles of natural justice. It is stated that basing on the evidence adduced before the Enquiry Officer,
the Enquiry Officer submitted his report holding the charges levelled against the Petitioner was proved. A copy of the
enquiry report and the enquiry proceeding was sent to the Petitioner by way of show cause notice giving him an
opportunity to make representation against the findings of the enquiry report; since the charge levelled against the
Petitioner is proved and it was serious in nature, punishment warranted was dismissal from service. The Disciplinary
Authority has gone through the enquiry proceeding and his past record and found that there was no extenuating
circumstances to take a lenient view and lastly, the Respondents were constrained to dismiss the Petitioner from
service. It is stated that in fact the Petitioner was irregular to his duties and he did not improve his attendance even
after issuing charge sheet to him, and after receiving the show cause notice. It is further stated that the punishment
imposed on the Petitioner is justified and legal and as such the claim petition is liable to be dismissed in limini.
4.
In view of the memo filed by the Counsel for the Petitioner conceding the legality and validity of the domestic
enquiry conducted in the present case, the domestic enquiry conducted by the Respondents is held as legal and valid
vide order dated 8.9.2010.
5.
Both the parties have advanced their arguments U/s.11A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 in support of their
claim.
6.
In view of the above facts, the points for determination are:
I.
Whether the action of the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., in imposing the
punishment of dismissal from service to Sri Parvatha Srinivas is legal and justified?
II.
Whether the Petitioner is entitled for reinstatement into service?
III.
If not, to what other relief he is entitled?
7.
Point No.I: During the course of argument, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner
submitted that due to illness and family problems, the Petitioner could not be able to attend his duty sincerely. Even in
his show cause the Petitioner has mentioned the above facts but it has not been considered during the course of the
enquiry and on account of absenteeism capital punishment of dismissal from service was imposed on the Petitioner.
When the Petitioner has taken a stand that due to his illness, and other family problems he could not be able to attend
his duties regularly and remained absent, the authority should have considered his case while imposing capital
punishment. But the authority has not considered any of the submissions of the Petitioner, and has imposed capital
punishment to the Petitioner when several modes of punishment are enumerated in the company’s Standing Orders.
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940
4359
8.
On the other hand, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents submitted that when the
Petitioner was a chronic absentee and was found guilty of the charges levelled against him, the punishment imposed
by the Respondents’ company is legal and proper. When the Petitioner was not sincere in his duty and failed to
maintain minimum musters in a year he is not entitled to be reinstated in service.
9.
Admittedly, working in the Mines is hazardous and remaining absent is not unusual. In this case, due to ill
health and other family problems of the Petitioner, he could not be able to regular in his duty, remained absent in his
duties and a proceeding was initiated against him for his absenteeism followed by an enquiry. In the enquiry, the
charges levelled against the Petitioner were proved. For this, capital punishment was imposed on the Petitioner. After
dismissal of service, the Petitioner has become jobless and unable to provide a square meal to his family members. He
has already realised his mistake and has taken shelter in the court at the age of 25 years, he is now aged about 35 years
and is searching ways and means to provide bread and butter to his family members. The Petitioner being an able
bodied and energetic man has already realised his mistake and is coming forward to the court at the age of 25 years to
work under the Respondents. In such a circumstances, atleast one chance should be given to him for reinstatement
into service in order to save his family members. Admittedly several modes of punishment are enumerated in
company’s Standing Orders. The Petitioner is a first offender and has worked under the Respondents. While imposing
capital punishment to his employees, the management should think of the condition of the workers as well as his
family members. In this case, the punishment imposed by the Respondents for dismissal of service is too harsh.
Therefore, it can safely be stated that the action taken by the management in imposing the punishment of dismissal
from service to Sri Parvatha Srinivas is not legal and justified.
Thus, Point No.I is answered accordingly.
10.
Point Nos. II & III: In Point No.I, it has already been discussed that the punishment of dismissal from service
to Sri Parvatha Srinivas is not legal and justified. After dismissal of service as stated earlier, when the Petitioner has
already realised his mistake and has come to the court with a prayer for reinstatement into service he should be given a
chance to serve for his family members. After dismissal of service the Petitioner has become jobless and he being the
sole bread earner of his family, is unable to provide a square meal to his family members. In such a circumstances
atleast the Petitioner should be given a chance to maintain his livelihood and to work under the Respondents’
management. But in this case, the Petitioner has not come to the court soon after his dismissal of service. In the
opinion of this Tribunal the Petitioner is not entitled to get all the relief as claimed in his claim petition. But he is only
entitled to be given a chance to work in the Respondents’ management.
Thus, Point Nos. II & III are answered accordingly.
ORDER
Proceeding No. BPA/PER/129/3585 dated 25.12.2007 issued by Respondent No.1 is declared as illegal and is
hereby set aside. It is ordered that the workman Sri Parvatha Srinivas be taken into service as a fresh employee i.e.,
Badli filler in Cat.I, on initial basic pay without back wages and continuity of service, subject to medical fitness by the
company Medical Board and the workman be kept under probation for a period of one year. The management is also
directed to take an undertaking of good behaviour from the workman at the time of his posting.
The Workman can not claim for his posting in the same place, where he was last employed. The workman
shall have to maintain either minimum mandatory 20 musters every month or 190 musters in a year and the
management shall have the right to review the work of the workman in every three months. In the event of any short
fall of attendance during the period of the three months, the service of the workman shall not be terminated and he
will be cautioned to improve his performance by issuing him a warning letter. However, in the event of any shortfall
of attendance during one year of service of the workman, he will be terminated from service without any further notice
and enquiry and in the event of completion of one year of probation satisfactorily, the workman is to continue in
service till the age of attaining superannuation. The management shall consider any forced absenteeism on account of
Mine accidents/ Natural disasters, taking treatment in the company’s hospital, as attendance. All other usual terms and
conditions of appointment will be applicable i.e., transfer, hours of work, day of rest, holidays etc.. to the workman for
appointment afresh.
Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.
Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant and corrected by me on this the 25th day of
April, 2018.
MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer
4360
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Appendix of evidence
Witnesses examined for the Petitioner
Witnesses examined for the Respondent
NIL
NIL
Documents marked for the Petitioner
NIL
Documents marked for the Respondent
NIL
ubZ fnYyh] 20 twu] 2018
dk-vk- 986-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ-lh-
,y- ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vfèkdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k ,ylh 18@2008) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks
19-06-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&22012@255@2007&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º
jktsUæ flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 20th June, 2018
S.O. 986.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Corrigendum Award (Ref. No. 18/2008) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of
M/s. E.C.L. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 19.06.2018.
[No. L-22012/255/2007-IR (CM-II)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT,
ASANSOL
PRESENT : Shri Pramod Kumar Mishra, Presiding Officer
REFERENCE NO. 18 OF 2008
PARTIES :
The management of Dabour Colliery of M/s. ECL
v/s
Shri Naresh Tiwary
REPRESENTATIVES :
For the Management :
Shri P. K. Das, Learned Advocate
For the Union (Workmen) :
Shri Gaya Prasad Mal, Learned Union Representative
Industry : Coal
State : West Bengal
DATED : 04.06.2018
AWARD
In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-section(1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947), Govt. of India through the Ministry of Labour vide its letter NO. L-22012/
255/2007-IR(CM-II) dated 12.05.2008 has been pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by this
Tribunal.
SCHEDULE
“Whether the demand of Koyala Mazdoor Congress, Asansol for rectification of date of birth of Sri Naresh
Tiwari, Clerk is legal and justified? To what relief is the workman concerned entitled? ”
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940
4361
1.
Having received the Order NO. L-22012/255/2007-IR(CM-II) dated 12.05.2008 of the above said reference
from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a Reference Case No. 18 of
2008 was registered on 22.05.2008. Accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through the
registered post to the parties concerned, directing them to appear in the court, on the date fixed and to file their written
statements along with the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance of the said
order notices by the registered post were sent to the parties concerned. Both the parties appeared in the Tribunal,
through their representatives.
2.
The workman has alleged in his written statement that he joined Dabor (R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields
Limited on 29.01.1973. His age was recorded as 24 (Twenty Four) years in 1973. Though his appointment was made
on the basis of his Matriculation Certificate in which his date of birth was recorded as 05.08.1950. The workman
Shri Naresh Tiwary inadvertently signed the B-Form of the colliery without pursuing the wrong entry regarding his
date of birth. The workman raised his objection before the management as soon as he came to know about the wrong
entry of his date of birth as recorded in C.M.P.F. records. The management accepted the claim of the workman and
constituted a committee to examine the case of the workman, Shri Naresh Tiwary. The said committee submitted its
report in favour of the workman, Shri Naresh Tiwary. A Note Sheet No. C-6/120/P-480 dated 01.03.2006 was initiated
by the colliery management for taking necessary approval to correct the date of birth of the workman as per
Matriculation Certificate. But the matter was kept pending for a long period and the workman was forced to
superannuate prematurely. The workman has prayed that the Tribunal may kindly direct the management of Dabor (R)
Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited to rectify the workman’s date of birth in company’s record and to pay his
wages and other consequential benefits for the period arising out of his premature superannuation.
3.
The Agent of Dabor (R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has alleged in his written statement that
demand of the union for rectification of date of birth of the workman Shri Naresh Tiwary is not justified. It appears
form record that Shri Naresh Tiwary joined the service on 29.1.1973. In statutory Form ‘B’ of the colliery his age is
recorded as 24 (Twenty Four) years as on 1973. Shri Naresh Tiwary after perusing the entry affixed his signature. In
the year 1987 a service excerpt was issued to him quoting almost all the dates including the age entered in the records,
seeking comments. But Shri Naresh Tiwary did not make any objection in respect of his age. The workman Shri Naresh
Tiwary got ample opportunity during his long span of service to get correction of age. But he remained silent for period
of over 3 (Three) decades. The dispute is of Civil nature and not an Industrial Dispute. The demand of the union -
Koyala Mazdoor Congress, Asansol for rectification of age of Shri Naresh Tiwary cannot be considered.
4.
The workman has filed the following documentary evidence :-
(i) Photocopy of the Matriculation Certificate, (ii) Photocopy of the Mark Sheet of Matriculation Examination,
(iii) Photocopy of the Admission Card for the Matriculation Examination, Photocopy of Identity Card of the workman
issued by the Colliery, (iv) Photocopy of the document from CMPF dated 05.01.1993, (v) Photocopy of the Character
Certificate from High School, (vi) Photocopy of the observation report of the committee member, (vii) Photocopy of
the I. I. No. 76 of the Joint Bipartite Committee for the Coal Industry.
The workman Shri Naresh Tiwary has filed affidavit in his oral evidence. He has been cross-examined by the
learned advocate of the management of Dabor (R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited
The management of Dabor (R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has not filed any documentary or
oral evidence.
5.
I have heard the arguments of Shri P. K. Das, learned advocate on behalf of the Dabor (R) Colliery of M/s.
Eastern Coalfields Limited and Shri Gaya Prasad Mal, learned advocate on behalf the workman Shri Naresh Tiwary.
6.
Shri P. K. Das, learned advocate on behalf of the Dabor (R) Colliery has argued that at the time of entry the age
of workman is recorded as 24 years as on 1973 in Form ‘B’ Register and other records. After long period of service at
the time of retirement he cannot raise the dispute for correction of his age. He is not entitled to any relief. On the other
hand Shri Gaya Prasad Mal, learned advocate of the workman Shri Naresh Tiwary has argued that at the time of entry
in service he has already passed Matriculation Examination. As per Matriculation Certificate his date of birth is
05.08.1950 but management wrongly recorded his date of birth. On his representation a committee was constituted by
the management. The committee recommended the correction of age as per Matriculation Certificate but the
management did not accept the recommendation of his own committee. His date of birth ought to have been corrected,
he has been prematurely retired which is illegal.
7.
The guide line regarding determination of the age at the time of appointment has been laid down in The Joint
Bipartite Committee for the Coal Industry No. CIL/WCWA-III/I.I.No.76/88/185 dated 25.04.199 which is as follows :-
4362
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
“ Matriculates: In the case of appointees who have passed Matriculation or equivalent examinations, the date
of birth recorded in the said certificates shall be treated as correct date of birth and the same will not be altered
under any circumstances.
Review / determination of date of birth in respect of existing employees : (a) In the case of the existing
employees Matriculation Certificate or Higher Secondary Certificate issued by the Recognised Universities or
Board or Middle Pass Certificate issued by the Board of Education and / or Department of the Public
Instruction and admit cards issued by the aforesaid Bodies should be treated as correct provided they were
issued by the said Universities / Boards / Institutions prior to the date of employment. ”
8.
The workman has filed copy of his Matriculation Certificate. As per Matriculation Certificate his date of birth is
05.08.1950. He has passed the high school in the year 1967. He has joined the service in the year 1973. Therefore it is
manifest that at the time of joining the service the concerned workman had already passed the Matriculation
Examination. Therefore ignoring the Matriculation Certificate and recording wrong date of birth is unjustified. The
committee constituted by the management of Dabor (R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has recommended
that :-
“As per ‘B’ Form Sl. No. 26 his age / dated of birth is 24 years as on 1973. The candidate produced original
Madhyamik Certificate certifying age / Date of Birth is 05.08.1950 issued by Bihar Bidyalaya Pariksha Samiti.
As per I. I. 76 the age recorded in S. R. Certificates is to be accepted so in this case his Date of Birth as per
School Certificates i.e. 05 August Nineteen Hundred Fifty may be accepted.”
9.
The workman has alleged in his oral evidence that he passed the Matriculation Examination in the year 1967.
He joined the Coal Company on 29.01.1973. He got recorded his date of birth in the original and statutory Form and
Register which is Exhibit- 2. His date of birth was correctly recorded as 05.08.1950 in the records of C.M.P.F. which is
Exhibit- 3. In the year 1987 the copy of service record was served on him. Entry of his date of birth was wrong. He
raised the objection regarding his incorrect date of birth. The management constituted the committee who submitted the
report in favour of the workman. The management initiated a Note Sheet being No.- C-6/RO/P480 dated 10.03.2006
for taking necessary approval for correction of date of birth.
10.
Form perusal of evidence of the workman it is apparent that he raised the dispute regarding incorrect date of
birth in the year 1987. But management did not pay any heed to the objection of the concerned workman. It is
surprising that in Identity Card issued by the management of Dabor (R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited
which is Annexure- B the date of birth of the workman Shri Naresh Tiwary is recorded as 05.08.1950.
11.
The management Dabor (R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited cannot deny the rightful claim of the
workman Shri Naresh Tiwary. The management has erroneously recorded wrong date of birth. The management of
Dabor (R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has not followed its own circular letter which laid down the
parameter for determining the age at the time of appointment. Even management of Dabor (R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern
Coalfields Limited has not implemented the report of committee which has been constituted by the management itself.
12.
In view of above discussion the demand of Koyala Mazdoor Congress for rectification of date of birth of Shri
Naresh Tiwary, Clerk is legal and justified. The workman Shri Naresh Tiwary is entitled for correction of date of birth
in company’s record as per his Matriculation Certificate i.e. 05.08.1950. The workman has been wrongly
superannuated. He is entitled for his wages and other consequential benefits arising out of his premature
superannuation.
O R D E R
Let an “Award” be and the same is passed as per above discussion. Send the copies of the order to the Govt. of
India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for information and needful. The reference is accordingly disposed of.
PRAMOD KUMAR MISHRA, Presiding Officer
Uploaded by Dte. of Printing at Government of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi-110064
and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi-110054. ALOK
KUMAR
Digitally signed by
ALOK KUMAR
Date: 2018.07.07
10:04:58 +05'30'