3287 GI/2018

(4275)

jftLVªh la- Mh- ,y- (,u) 04@0007@2003µ05

REGD. No. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05

izkf/dkj ls izdkf'kr

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

lkIrkfgd

WEEKLY

la- 24]

ubZ fnYyh] twu 17—twu 23] 2018] 'kfuokj@T;s"B 27—vk"kk<+ 2] 1940

No. 24]

NEW DELHI, JUNE 17—JUNE 23, 2018, SATURDAY/JYAISTHA 27—ASADHA 2, 1940

bl Hkkx esa fHkUu i`"B la[;k nh tkrh gS ftlls fd ;g i`Fkd ladyu ds :i esa j[kk tk lds

Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

Hkkx II—[k.M 3—mi&[k.M (ii)

PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)

Hkkjr ljdkj ds ea=kky;ksa (j{kk ea=kky; dks NksM+dj) }kjk tkjh fd, x, lkafof/d vkns'k vkSj vf/lwpuk,a

Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India

(Other than the Ministry of Defence)

िव त

िव त

िव त

िव त मंालय

मंालय

मंालय

मंालय

(राज व

राज व

राज व

राज व िवभाग

िवभाग

िवभाग

िवभाग)

(िह दी

िह दी

िह दी

िह दी अनुभाग

अनुभाग

अनुभाग

अनुभाग-2)

नई द ली, 17 मई, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 958

958

958

958.—के ीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासकय योजन के िलए योग) िनयम, 1976 के िनयम 10 के उपिनयम

(4) के अनुसरण म$ राज% व िवभाग के अधीन के ीय कर, व% तु एवं सेवाकर एवं क$ ीय उ* पाद शु क आयु- तालय, गौतम बु0 नगर, िजसके

80 ितशत से अिधक कम1चा3रय ने िह दी का काय1 साधक 5ान ा6 त कर िलया है, को अिधसूिचत करती है।

[फा.सं. ई-11017/3/2017-िह दी-2 डीओआर डीओआर]

डॉ. सतीश च , संयु- त िनदेशक (राजभाषा)

4276

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

MINISTRY OF FINANCE

(Department of Revenue)

(HINDI SECTION-2)

New Delhi, the 17th May, 2018

S.O. 958.—In pursuance of sub rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for Official Purpose of the

Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government, hereby notifies Central tax, Goods and Service tax and central excise

Commissionerate, Gautam Buddh Nagar, under the Department of Revenue, where more than 80% staff have acquired the

working knowledge of Hindi.

[F. No. E-11017/3/2017-Hindi-II DOR DOR]

Dr. SATISH CHANDRA, Jt. Director (OL)

नई द ली, 17 मई, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 959

959

959

959.—के ीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासकय योजन के िलए योग) िनयम, 1976 के िनयम 10 के उपिनयम

(4) के अनुसरण म$ राज% व िवभाग के अधीन आयु- त काया1लय, सीमा शु क: हवाई काग: िनया1त, नई द ली, िजसके 80 ितशत से

अिधक कम1चा3रय ने िह दी का काय1 साधक 5ान ा6 त कर िलया है, को अिधसूिचत करती है।

[फा.सं. ई-11017/3/2017-िह दी-2 डीओआर डीओआर]

डॉ. सतीश च , संयु- त िनदेशक (राजभाषा)

New Delhi, the 17th May, 2018

S.O. 959.—In pursuance of sub rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for Official Purpose of the

Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government, hereby notifies Office of the Commissioner, Customs: Air Cargo Export,

New Delhi, under the Department of Revenue, where more than 80% staff have acquired the working knowledge of

Hindi.

[F. No. E-11017/3/2017-Hindi-II DOR DOR]

Dr. SATISH CHANDRA, Jt. Director (OL)

नई द ली, 17 मई, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 960

960

960

960.—के ीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासकय योजन के िलए योग) िनयम, 1976 के िनयम 10 के उपिनयम

(4) के अनुसरण म$ राज% व िवभाग के अधीन सीमा शु क आयु- त का काया1लय, सीमा शु क गृह, कोि= च-682009, िजसके 80 ितशत से

अिधक कम1चा3रय ने िह दी का काय1 साधक 5ान ा6 त कर िलया है, को अिधसूिचत करती है।

[फा.सं. ई-11017/3/2017-िह दी-2 डीओआर डीओआर]

डॉ. सतीश च , संयु- त िनदेशक (राजभाषा)

New Delhi, the 17th May, 2018

S.O. 960.—In pursuance of sub rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for Official Purpose of the

Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government, hereby notifies Office of the Commissioner of Customs, Custom House,

Coachin-682009, under the Department of Revenue, where more than 80% staff have acquired the working knowledge of

Hindi.

[F. No. E-11017/3/2017-Hindi-II DOR DOR]

Dr. SATISH CHANDRA, Jt. Director (OL)

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940

4277

नई द ली, 13 जून, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 961

961

961

961.—के ीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासकय योजन के िलए योग) िनयम, 1976 के िनयम 10 के उपिनयम

(4) के अनुसरण म$ राज% व िवभाग के अधीन णाली एवं आंकड़ा बंधन महािनदेशालय, क$ ीय उ*पाद एवं सीमा शु क, नई द ली,

िजसके 80 ितशत से अिधक कम1चा3रय ने िह दी का काय1 साधक 5ान ा6 त कर िलया है, को अिधसूिचत करती है।

[फा.सं. ई-11017/3/2017-िह दी-2 डीओआर डीओआर]

डॉ. सतीश च , संयु- त िनदेशक (राजभाषा)

New Delhi, the 13th June, 2018

S.O. 961.—In pursuance of sub rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for Official Purpose of the

Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government, hereby notifies Directorate general of Systems & data management,

Customs & Central Excise, New Delhi, under the Department of Revenue, where more than 80% staff have acquired the

working knowledge of Hindi.

[F. No. E-11017/3/2017-Hindi-II DOR DOR]

Dr. SATISH CHANDRA, Jt. Director (OL)

नई द ली, 13 जून, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 962

962

962

962.—के ीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासकय योजन के िलए योग) िनयम, 1976 के िनयम 10 के उपिनयम

(4) के अनुसरण म$ राज% व िवभाग के अधीन के ीय व% तु एवं सेवाकर तथा के ीय उ* पाद शु क, नागपुर-1 आयु- तालय के 4 भागीय

काया1लय (भाग-शहर, @हगना, भंडारा,चं पुर), िजसम$ 80 ितशत से अिधक कम1चा3रय ने िह दी का काय1 साधक 5ान ा6 त कर िलया

है, को अिधसूिचत करती है।

[फा.सं. ई-11017/3/2017-िह दी-2 डीओआर डीओआर]

डॉ. सतीश च , संयु- त िनदेशक (राजभाषा)

New Delhi, the 13th June, 2018

S.O. 962.—In pursuance of sub rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for Official Purpose of the

Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government, hereby notifies, The 4 Divisional Offices (Division-City, Hingna,

Bhandara, Chandrapur) of CGST & Central Excise Nagpur-1 Commissionerate under the Department of Revenue, where

more than 80% staff have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi.

[F. No. E-11017/3/2017-Hindi-II DOR DOR]

Dr. SATISH CHANDRA, Jt. Director (OL)

नई द ली, 13 जून, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 963

963

963

963.—के ीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासकय योजन के िलए योग) िनयम, 1976 के िनयम 10 के उपिनयम

(4) के अनुसरण म$ राज% व िवभाग के अधीन सीमा शु क आयु- तालय पुणे एवं इसके अधीन% थ सभी मंडल काया1लय, िजसम$ 80 ितशत

से अिधक कम1चा3रय ने िह दी का काय1 साधक 5ान ा6 त कर िलया है, को अिधसूिचत करती है।

[फा.सं. ई-11017/3/2017-िह दी-2 डीओआर डीओआर]

डॉ. सतीश च , संयु- त िनदेशक (राजभाषा)

New Delhi, the 13th June, 2018

S.O. 963.—In pursuance of sub rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for Official Purpose of the

Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government, hereby notifies Commissionerate of Customs, Pune and its Subordinate all

divisional offices, under the Department of Revenue, where more than 80% staff have acquired the working knowledge of

Hindi.

[F. No. E-11017/3/2017-Hindi-II DOR DOR]

Dr. SATISH CHANDRA, Jt. Director (OL)

4278

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

नई द ली, 13 जून, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 964

964

964

964.—के ीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासकय योजन के िलए योग) िनयम, 1976 के िनयम 10 के उपिनयम

(4) के अनुसरण म$ राज% व िवभाग के अधीन के ीय व% तु एवं सेवा कर तथा क$ ीय उ* पाद शु क आयु- तालय, मुंबई मध् य, िजसके 80

ितशत से अिधक कम1चा3रय ने िह दी का काय1 साधक 5ान ा6 त कर िलया है, को अिधसूिचत करती है।

[फा.सं. ई-11017/3/2017-िह दी-2 डीओआर डीओआर]

डॉ. सतीश च , संयु- त िनदेशक (राजभाषा)

New Delhi, the 13th June, 2018

S.O. 964.—In pursuance of sub rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for Official Purpose of the

Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government, hereby notifies CGST & Central Excise Commissionerate, Mumbai

Central, under the Department of Revenue, where more than 80% staff have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi.

[F. No. E-11017/3/2017-Hindi-II DOR DOR]

Dr. SATISH CHANDRA, Jt. Director (OL)

नई द ली, 13 जून, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 965

965

965

965.—के ीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासकय योजन के िलए योग) िनयम, 1976 के िनयम 10 के उपिनयम

(4) के अनुसरण म$ राज% व िवभाग के अधीन के ीय माल एवं सेवा कर आयु- तालय, चंडीगढ़, िजसके 80 ितशत से अिधक कम1चा3रय ने

िह दी का काय1 साधक 5ान ा6 त कर िलया है, को अिधसूिचत करती है।

[फा.सं. ई-11017/3/2017-िह दी-2 डीओआर डीओआर]

डॉ. सतीश च , संयु- त िनदेशक (राजभाषा)

New Delhi, the 13th June, 2018

S.O. 965.—In pursuance of sub rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for Official Purpose of the

Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government, hereby notifies Central Goods and Service Tax Commissionerate,

Chandigarh, under the Department of Revenue, where more than 80% staff have acquired the working knowledge of

Hindi.

[F. No. E-11017/3/2017-Hindi-II DOR DOR]

Dr. SATISH CHANDRA, Jt. Director (OL)

dkfeZd] yksd f’kdk;r rFkk isa’ku ea=ky;

¼dkfeZd vkSj izf’k{k.k foHkkx½

ubZ fnYyh] 13 twu] 2018

dk-vk- 966.—dsUnz ljdkj ,rn~}kjk naM izfdz;k lafgrk] 1973 ¼1974 dk vf/kfu;e la- 2½ dh /kkjk 24 dh mi/kkjk

¼8½ }kjk iznRr 'kfä;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, l= U;k;ky; tcyiqj] e/; izns’k esa fnYyh fo’ks"k iqfyl LFkkiuk ¼lhchvkbZ½ }kjk

laLFkkfir dsl la[;k vkjlh 1¼,l½@2014@,llh;w&V@,llh&II@ubZ fnYyh esa mifLFkr gksus rFkk buls mRiUu izklafxd

vU; ekeyksa esa vihy@iqujh{k.k dk lapkyu djus ds fy, Jh :Lre [kku] vf/koDrk dks mudh fu;qfDr dh rkjh[k ls rhu

o"kksZa ds fy, vFkok mudks lkSais x, ekeyksa ds fuiVku rd] tks Hkh igys gks] fo’ks"k yksd vfHk;kstd ds :i esa fu;qDr djrh

gSA

[Qk- la- 225@18@2017&,ohMh&II]

,y- ih- 'kekZ] voj lfpo

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940

4279

MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS

(Department of Personnel and Training)

New Delhi, the 13th June, 2018

S.O. 966.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (8) of section 24 of the Code of Criminal

Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Rustam Khan, Advocate as Special Public

Prosecutor for conducting case No. RC 1(S)/2014/SCU.V/SC-II/New Delhi instituted by the Delhi Special Police

Establishment (C.B.I.) in the Sessions Court at Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh and appeals and revisions or other matters

connected there with or incidental thereto for a period of three years from the date of appointment or disposal of the case

whichever is earlier.

[F.No. 225/18/2017-AVD-II]

L. P. SHARMA, Under Secy.

नई द ली, 13 जून, 2018

का

का

का

का.आ.

.आ.

.आ.

.आ. 967

967

967

967.—के सरकार एतद्Bारा द ली िवशेष पुिलस % थापना अिधिनयम, 1946 (1946 का अिधिनयम संC या 25) क

धारा 6 के साथ प3ठत धारा 5 क उपधारा (1) Bारा दE शिFय का योग करते Gए िHपुरा राI य सरकार, गृह िवभाग अगरतला क

अिधसूचना सं. एफ.21(2)-पीडी/12(पी)/872 दनांक 17.03.2018 के माJ यम से ाK सहमित से िजरािनया के शांतनु भौिमक, पुH

Mी सदन भौिमक, पिNम िHपुरा िजला क ह*या के संबंध म$ भारतीय दंड संिहता क धारा 332/333 के साथ प3ठत धारा

148/149/302/120(बी), 1860(1860 का अिधिनयम संCया 45), तथा लोक सRपिE नुकसान िनवारण अिधिनयम,1984 (1984 का

अिधिनयम संCया 3) क धारा 3 के अंतग1त, मंडयी पुिलस थाना मामला संCया 2017/एमडीआई/006, दनांक 20.09.2017 म$ अ वेषण

के िलए तथा उ- त मामले म$ भारतीय दंड संिहता म$ वSणत एक अथवा एक से अिधक अपराध से सR ब0 म$ कए गए यास, दुT ेरणाU

और षWंH तथा उसी संX यवहार म$ कए गए या उ हY तZ य से उ* प न ासंिगक कोई अ य अपराध अथवा अपराध क जांच करने के

िलए द ली िवशेष पुिलस % थापना के सद% य क शिFय और [ेHािधकार का िव% तार सम% त िHपुरा राI य म$ करती है ।

[फा. सं. 228/22/2018-एवीडी-II]

एल. पी. शमा1, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 13th June, 2018

S.O. 967.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub section (1) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi

Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (Act No. 25 of 1946), the Central Government with the consent of State

Government of Tripura, Home Department issued vide Notification No. F.21(2)-PD/12(P)/872 dated Agartala,

17.03.2018, hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment in the

whole of the State of Tripura for investigation in the Mandai PS Case No. 2017/MDI/006, dated 20.09.2017 U/s

148/149/302/120(B) IPC read with section 332/333 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860(Act No. 45 of 1860), and Section 3 of

Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 (Act No. 3 of 1984) in connection with the death of Santanu

Bhowmik, Son of Sri Sadhan Bhowmik of Jirania, West Tripura District and attempts, abetments and conspiracies in

relation to or in connection with one or more of the offences mentioned in the Indian Penal Code and any other offence

or offences committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the said facts.

[F. No. 228/22/2018-AVD-II]

L. P. SHARMA, Under Secy.

ubZ fnYyh] 13 twu] 2018

dk-vk- 968.—dsUnz ljdkj ,rn~}kjk naM izfdz;k lafgrk] 1973 ¼1974 dk vf/kfu;e la- 2½ dh /kkjk 24 dh mi/kkjk

¼8½ }kjk iznRr 'kfä;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, tyxkWo] egkjk"Vª fLFkr l= U;k;ky; ds le{k ekeyk la- vkjlh

02¼,l½@2007&eqEcbZ ¼oh-th- ikfVy gR;k ekeyk½ ,oa vihyh;@iqujh{k.k U;k;ky; esa rRlEcU/kh vihyksa@iqujh{k.kksa ;k muls

lEc) vU; ekeyksa rFkk buds vuq"kafxd ekeyksa ds lapkyu ds fy, Jh vkRekjke txUukFk ikfVy] vf/koDrk dks ekeys ds

fuLRkkj.k ;k vxys vkns’kksa rd tks Hkh igys gks] ds fy, fo’ks"k yksd vfHk;kstd ds :i esa fu;qDr djrh gSA

[Qk- la- 225@23@2016&,ohMh&II]

,y- ih- 'kekZ] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 13th June, 2018

S.O. 968.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (8) of section 24 of the Code of Criminal

Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Atmaram Jagannath Patil, Advocate, Jalgaon,

4280

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

as Special Public Prosecutor, for conducting trial of case RC 2(S)/2007-Mumbai (V.G. Patil Murder case) before the

Court of Session at Jalgaon, Maharashtra and appeals or revisions or other matters arising out of the said case before the

appellate or revisional court, till disposal of the case or until further order, whichever is earlier.

[F.No. 225/23/2016-AVD-II]

L. P. SHARMA, Under Secy.

नई द ली, 14 जून, 2018

का

का

का

का.आ.

.आ.

.आ.

.आ. 969

969

969

969.—क$ ीय सरकार, दंड ^या संिहता, 1973 (1974 का अिधिनयम सं. 2) क धारा 24 क उपधारा (8) Bारा

दE शिFय का योग करते Gए, Mी बी.बी. बदामी, अिधव- ता को, िवशेष यायाधीश, क$ ीय अ वेषण ` यूरो, मुRबई के यायालय म$

द ली िवशेष पुिलस % थापन (के ीय अ वेषण ` यूरो) Bारा संि%थत वाद सं. आरसी.6/ई/2015-बीएस एंड एफसी/सीबीआई, मुRबई

(आईडीबीआई/bकगफशर एयरलाइ स वाद, सीबीआई बनाम िवजय माया और अ य) का और अपील, पुनरी[ण और उससे संबंिधत

और उसके आनुषंिगक अ य मामल का संचालन के िलए, िनयुिF क तारीख से तीन वष1 के िलए या कांउसेल को सeपे गए उF मामले का

िनपटारा होने तक या अगले आदेश तक, इनम$ से जो भी पूव1तर हो, िवशेष लोक अिभयोजक के fप म$ िनयु- त करती है ।

[फा. सं. 225/09/2017-एवीडी-II]

एल. पी. शमा1, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 14th June, 2018

S.O. 969.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (8) of section 24 of the Code of Criminal

Procedure, 1973 (Act No. 2 of 1974), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri B.B. Badami, Advocate as Special

Public Prosecutor for conducting prosecution in case No. RC.6/E/2015-BS&FC/CBI, Mumbai (IDBI/Kingfisher Airlines

case, CBI V/s Vijay Mallya and others) instituted by the Delhi Special Police Establishment (C.B.I.) in the court of

Special Judge, CBI, Mumbai and appeals, revisions and other matters connected there with and incidental thereto for a

period of three years from the date of appointment or disposal of the said case entrusted to the counsel or till further

orders, whichever is earlier.

[F. No. 225/09/2017-AVD-II]

L. P. SHARMA, Under Secy.

कृिष एवं कसान क या

कृिष एवं कसान क या

कृिष एवं कसान क या

कृिष एवं कसान क याण मं

ण मं

ण मं

ण मं ालय

ालय

ालय

ालय

(कृकृकृकृिष

िष

िष

िष, सहकारता एवं कसान क या

सहकारता एवं कसान क या

सहकारता एवं कसान क या

सहकारता एवं कसान क याण िवभाग

ण िवभाग

ण िवभाग

ण िवभाग)

नई द ली, 14 जून, 2018

का

का

का

का.आ.

.आ.

.आ.

.आ. 970

970

970

970.—बG-राIयीय सहकारी सिमितयां अिधिनयम, 2002 (2002 का 39) के खंड 4 के उपखंड (1) Bारा दत

शि- तय का योग करते Gए भारत सरकार क अिधसूचना सं. एल-11012/2/2003-एल एवं एम दनांक 11 मई, 2015 के अिध^मण म$

के सरकार एतद्Bारा Mी दनेश कुमार, संयुF सिचव (सहका3रता) को कृिष एवं कसान क याण मंHालय, कृिष, सहका3रता एवं कसान

क याण िवभाग म$ त*काल भाव से अथवा अगले आदेश तक सहकारी सिमितय के के ीय पंजीयक के fप म$ िनयुF करती हj ।

[सं. एल-11012/2/2003-एल एवं एम]

सुशील कुमार झा, अवर सिचव

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940

4281

MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FARMERS WELFARE

(Department of Agriculture, Cooperation and Farmers Welfare)

New Delhi, the 14th June, 2018

S.O. 970.—In exercise of the powers conferred vide sub-section (1) of Section 4 of the Multi-State Cooperative

Societies Act, 2002 (39 of 2002) and in supersession of the Government of India Notification No. L-11012/2/2003-L&M

dated 11th May, 2015, the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Dinesh Kumar, Joint Secretary (Cooperation) in the

Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Department of Agriculture, Cooperation and Farmers Welfare, as the

Central Registrar of Cooperative Societies with immediate effect and until further orders.

[No. L-11012/2/2003-L&M]

SUSHIL KUMAR JHA, Under Secy.

उपभोा मामले, खा! और साव#जिनक िवतरण मं ालय

उपभोा मामले, खा! और साव#जिनक िवतरण मं ालय

उपभोा मामले, खा! और साव#जिनक िवतरण मं ालय

उपभोा मामले, खा! और साव#जिनक िवतरण मं ालय

(उपभोा मामले िवभाग)

(उपभोा मामले िवभाग)

(उपभोा मामले िवभाग)

(उपभोा मामले िवभाग)

(भारतीय मानक %यूरो

भारतीय मानक %यूरो

भारतीय मानक %यूरो

भारतीय मानक %यूरो)

(कोि' च

कोि' च

कोि' च

कोि' च शाखा

शाखा

शाखा

शाखा)

कोि= च , 12 जून, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 971

971

971

971.—भारतीय मानक ` यूरो (माणन) िविनयम 1988 के िविनयम (4) के उपिविनयम (5) के अनुसरण म$ भारतीय

मानक ` यूरो एतद्Bारा अिधसूिचत करता है क िजनके िववरण नीचे अनुसूची म$ दए गए हj, को लाइस$स दान कए गए हj:-

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

01

01

01

01 जुलाई

जुलाई

जुलाई

जुलाई 2015

2015

2015

2015 से

से

से

से 31

31

31

31 माच#

माच#

माच#

माच# 2016

2016

2016

2016 तक  वी

तक  वी

तक  वी

तक  वीकृकृकृकृत कए गए

कए गए

कए गए

कए गए लाइस+स,

लाइस+स,

लाइस+स,

लाइस+स, क- सूची

क- सूची

क- सूची

क- सूची

^म

सं

लाईसेनस संCया

वैधता ितथी

पाटm का नाम एवं पता (कारखाना)

मानक के शीष1क

आई एस सं/

भाग/खंड/वष1

1

6400021185

02.07.2015

जासिमन जुवलेस1

िव पी 1/298 चूनाड जंगषन इला6पाकुलं

पी ओ

वेली-कुलं

आला6पुषा

केरला- 690 503

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

2

6400021589

08/07/2015

मज़रा गोड

बी पी4/838 एल/िनयर रिजडर आफस

बालुशोरी कालीकड

कोिषpोट

केरला- 673 612

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

3

6400021690

08/07/2015

इलातु Iवेलरी

डोर सं 14/207 (ओड 6/846 सी)

थिनरमुकं पी ओ ,चेथ1ला

आला6पुषा

केरल 688 527

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

4

6400021791

15/07/2015

अलाइका गोड Iवेलरी

कtरकलथानी कंजीरामु-कु

मल6पुरम

केरल- 679584

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

4282

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

5

6400021892

15/07/2015

अमर गोड और डायमंuस

%माट1 स$टर िब@डग िनयर ाईवेट बस

%टjड माला

िHशूर

केरल- 680732

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

6

6400021993

15/07/2015

पालाितगल Iवैलरी

डोर नंबर X / 561 नारागढ़ी, vालाथुर

पीओ नमनामघाट

िHशूर

केरल 679563

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

7

6400022086

20/07.2015

िचHा Iवेलरी

डोर नंबर VI/ 108-ए च$wामकुलम

अलककोदे पीओ

मला6पुरम

केरल 679591

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

8

6400022187

20/07/2015

धनालxमी Iवेलरी

टी.सी. 37/883 राजधानी िब@डग, फोट1,

फोट1 पीओ

ितyवनंतपुरम

केरल 695023

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

9

6400022288

20/07/2015

िभमा और zादर बुिलयन ाइवेट िलिमटेड

िभम टॉवर, 1526/700 ए

िHवे म रोड रेलवे %टेशन,

कोलम

केरल 691001

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:1999

10

6400022389

20/07/2015

िभमा और zादर बुिलयन ाइवेट

िलिमटेड

िभम िब@डग, 779-1,

िनयर के एस आर टी सी बस %टjड

पलpड़

केरल 678014

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

11

6400022490

20/07/2015

िभमा और zादर बुिलयन ाइवेट

िलिमटेड

िभम टॉवर, 588-1,2 वे%ट पैलेस रोड

िHशूर

केरल 680020

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

12

6400022591

22/07/2015

रेजीथ Iवेलरी

िनयर रेलवे गेट

पी.पी XIV / 452 (ओलड) पी पी

XVIII-19 (नई) पाि6पिनशेरी

क{णूर

केरल 670561

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

13

6400022692

22/07/2015

%टार Iवेलरी

डूर नंबर XI/ 633 ( यू) VI / 113

(ओड) पु|यूरकुलाम पीओ

िHशूर

केरल 679561

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

14

6400022793

22/07/2015

सीपीए Iवेलरी

िब@डग नंबर 5/729 ए (ओलड),

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

आई एस

1417:2016

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940

4283

10/1039 ( यू) सीपीए जं-शन, ईडाव|ा

मल6पुरम

केरल 676541

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

15

6400022894

22/07/2015

पुिलक$ स Iवेलरी

XX609, रोड चेरपु, चेरपू पीओ

िHशूर

केरल 680561

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

16

6400022995

22/07/2015

कोचुिव3}ल ले-शमी Iवेलरी

बेिसिसयल हॉि%पटल रोड कोतमंगलम

एरनाकुलम

केरल 686691

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

17

6400023088

22.07.2015

%वपन Iवेलस1

पाडा दि[ण, मुCय सड़क

कyनागपली

कोलम

केरल 690518

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

18

6400023189

22.07.2015

िचरpल गोड

मुितचुकारन, 529 बी

चेyपु wामपंचायत,

XVII िचरा6पु

िHशूर- 680561

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

19

6400023492

24.07.2015

िचHा Iवेलस1

वीएमसी 17/47 डेना कॉR6ले-स

पुEनचंदा

वक1 ला

ितyवनंतपुरम

केरल 695,141

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

20

6400023593

31.07.2015

िHशूर Iवेलस1

एपी .XII-324, आलुRमुडू

क यापुरम पीओ

ितyवनंतपुरम

केरल 695,301

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

21

6400023694

31.07.2015

जॉयीआलुpास इंिडया ाइवेट िलिमटेड

मेयीन रोड, अंगमाली

एना1कुलम

केरल 683572

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

22

6400023997

06.08.2015

मलबार गोड एंड डायमंuस

डोर नंबर .XX / 441 / 1,2 संकर अयर

जं-शन एम जी रोड

िHशूर

केरल 680004

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

23

6400024090

06.08.2015

पुथोर फैशन Iवैलस1

छठी / 416.यू.वी. कलरpल शॉ@पग स$टर

टेRपल रोड

िपरायर पीओ ना3टpा

िHशूर

केरल 680566

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

4284

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

24

6400024292

10.08.2015

िनचु गोड

10/210 ई, ओ पी पी: उyवाचल, मेिडकल

8,10 युyवाचल पीओ

क|ूर

केरल 670702

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

25

6400024393

10.08.2015

पािलथारा Iवेलस1

मा3रना शॉ@पग स$टर नेशनल हाईवे

थिलपाराRबा पीओ

क|ूर

केरल 670141

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

26

6400024595

06.08.2015

कैराली Iवेलस1

केराली ऑिडटो3रयम वक1ला

ितyवनंतपुरम

केरल 695141

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

27

6400024696

10.08.2015

मलबार ऑण1मेटस ाइवेट िलिमटेड

43/1095 ए, बी, ए वी के नायर रोड

तथाशेरी

क|ूर

केरल 670,101

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

28

6400024797

10.08.2015

3रदान गोड

टेके शॉ@पग कॉR6ले-स वीपी 5/539 बी,

वज़खाट पीओ,

मल6पुरम

केरल 673604

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

29

6400024898

10.08.2015

यू अरबी गोड पाक1

डोर नं .VIII / 1523 बै पास जं-शन,

को डोटी,मल6पुरम

केरल 673,638

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

30

6400024999

10.08.2015

आलाpािपलल Iवैलस1

आलाpािपलल काँम6ले-स 318A,

आम`बालूर ,काि5रामंटं

एना1कुलम

केरल 682 315

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

31

6400025092

10.08.2015

दीया गोड पेरंzा

yम नं .8 / 761,762 पेरंzा

पेरंzा पी ओ, कोिशकोड

केरल 673 525

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

32

6400025193

10.08.2015

िचरंकुिजयील Iवैलस1

पी पी ए-स 477, पेयावुर पीओ

क|ूर

केरल 670,633

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

33

6400026094

17.08.2015

चेममानूर गोड पालेस इंटरनेशनल

िलिमटेड

के पी ए-स / 335 एस, 335 डी, डी 1,

डी 2, डी 4,335 ई-एच, पुिलpल

िब@डग चेनटैटमेटं जं-शन, कट6पना

इडुp

केरल 685,508

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940

4285

34

6400026195

17.08.2015

अलुpास Iवेलरी

एम ओ रोड िHशूर

िHशूर

केरल 680001

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

35

6400026296

17.08.2015

दुबई गोड

बी: नं: 9/1611 टी ओ 9/1619 सी3ट

माक1 ओ पो सरकार अ%पताल प}ंबी रोड,

चेy6पुलाशेरी

पलाpड़

केरल 679,503

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

36

6400026397

18.08.2015

िचलंगा Iवेलस1

डोर सं .12 / 997.जी बी रोड

पालाpाड़

केरल 678,001

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

37

6400026498

18.08.2015

लxमी Iवेलरी

डोर सं .15/964 कोट1 रोड

आलथूर पीओ

पालाpाड़

केरल 678541

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

38

6400026599

18.08.2015

भारगावी गोड स$टर

डोर सं VII / 647, कालटीpोट

पालाpाड़

केरल 678,596

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

39

6400026704

04.09.2015

िभमा Iवेस ए युिणट ओफ बुटीक ाइवेट

िलिमटेड

डोर नं .34/40ए, बाई पास रोड,

इडा6पली, कोचीन

एना1कुलम

कोि‚

केरल 682,024

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

40

6400026805

07.09.2015

अमाना गोड

डोर नं.XVI / 650 पूवातानी रोड

कtर-लाथानी तpनतुरा चाइथलोर पीओ

पलpड़

केरल 678609

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

41

6400026906

07.09.2015

ए पी एस Iवेलरी

टी सी 8/1624, िथyमाला पी ओ,

िथyमाला

ितyवनंतपुरम

केरल 695,006

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

42

6400027096

07.09.2015

यू सोनास Iवैलरी

पुि|लाथ इzािहमकु}ी

मेमो3रयल शॉ@पग कॉR6ले-स, VII /

165बी, यू बज़ार जंगषन ए3रयाद VII,

ए3रयाड पीओ

िHशूर

केरल 680,666

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

4286

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

43

6400027197

07.09.2015

इशान जुवस पालस एल एल पी

%टडीम िब@डग, 18/53 डी,

ई कोईलाडी-18

कोईलाडी पी ओ

कोज़ीकोड

केरल 673,305

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

44

6400027298

07.09.2015

इ%हा गोड ऑगƒ स एलएलपी

स$टरी कॉR6ले-स, बीपी 4/978

एम एन पी, मुCय सड़क बाशरी 7,

बेलुस1री पीओ

कोज़ीकोड

केरल 673,612

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

45

6400027399

07.09.2015

ज़ैम जैम Iवेलस1

डोर नं .15 / 723, पीटी वािणिIयक

भवन, तािजpोड पीओ,

करीगलतानी

मल6पुरम

केरल 679,322

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

46

6400027403

07.09.2015

वैसाली Iवेलस1

प}ंबी रोड, इडा6पाल

मल6पुरम

केरल 679,576

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

47

6400027605

09.09.2015

िमलन गोड एंड डायमंuस

1 9/115 ए 28, 29, 30, 31 ए 28 टी

ओ 31 3„ागोड पंचायत, 19,

अलातीयूर

मल6पुरम

केरल 676,102

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

48

6400027706

09.09.2015

ले-शमी Iवेलस1

इटा6पोन, आयारािन-कुडी

कोज़ीकोड

केरल 690,558

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

49

6400027807

09.09.2015

मेलेपाट गोड

XIV / 482, मीनगढ़ी-wामा पंचायत

मेनागढ़ी पीओ

वायानाड

केरल 673,591

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

50

6400027908

09.09.2015

इडीयाड गोड

डोर एन पी 11/945, IX / 581 (ओड)

नेिडयनाट िब@डग, ना3रकुिन पीओ।

कोज़ीकोड

wाउंड 673,585

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

51

6400028098

09.09.2015

दीपा %वण1

डोर नं 111/505 (ओड) डोर नं.11/1

(नया) Rयूिनिसपल कॉR6ले-स

कासरगोड

केरल 671,121

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940

4287

52

6400028506

21.092015

यू िब%मी फैशन Iवेलरी

िब%मी 6लाजा, बीपी 111/1628 मेयीन

रोड बलरामपुरम पीओ

ितyवनंतपुरम

केरल 695,501

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

53

6400028607

21.09.2015

मुंडाEु फैशन Iवेलरी

XIII / 220 टेRपलेट पॉइंट वानपुरम

इडुp

केरल 685,607

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

54

6400028708

21.09.2015

कैराली Iवेलस1

एन एच -47, िHव$ म रोड कलमंबलम

ितyवनंतपुरम

केरल 695,605

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

55

6400028809

21.09.2015

कृTण Iवेलस1

लेयोला रोड, Mीका3रयम

ितyवनंतपुरम

केरल 695,017

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

56

6400028910

21.09.2015

िनिथन िसवर पालस

टी बी जं-शन, मुवाEुपुजा

एना1कुलम

केरल 686,661

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

57

6400029003

22.09.2015

मैनजली Iवेलस1

10 / 1268-123 िनयर यू चच1,

िHशूर

केरल 680,001

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

58

6400029407

01.10.2015

पुणिथल Iवेलरी

डोर नं.IV / 554 (ओएलड), IV/ 444

( यू) ओ पी पी.पो%ट काया1लय मुCय

रोड, पूरीपाली पीओ

वायनाड

केरल 673,579

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

59

6400029508

01.10.2015

मािलकास Iवेलरी

च$…डम रोड वेल$कोडे पीओ

मल6पुरम

केरल 679,579

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

60

6400029609

01.10.2015

यू पािवजं Iवेलरी

XIV / 432आर िनयर वडाकंचरी बस %टेट

शहर टॉवर िब@डग मुCय सड़क िHशूर

िHशूर

केरल 680,582

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

61

6400029710

01.10.2015

जे जे गोड

XXVII / 569, ए एम रोड कोथममंगलम

एना1कुलम

केरल 686,691

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

4288

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

62

6400029811

01.10.2015

पैराप†टू Iयूवेलस1

दरवाजा सं। बारहवY / 461

केवी.केकेकेटीयू कॉR6ले-स ओपीपी। %वण1थु

बस %टjड क‡ाबलाम पीओ

एना1कुलम

केरला-683562

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

63

6400029912

01.10.2015

वेलयुधन संनस Iवेलरी

डोर नं. पी.पी 7/15 मेयीन रोड रामपुरम

पी ओ

अंगादपुरम (वाया)

मल6पुरम

केरला-679321

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

64

6400030085

01.10.2015

के.वी Iवैलस1

डोर नं ए पी -14 / 916, एपी 8/718

(ओड) मेयीन रोड अंगादपुरम (वाया)

मल6पुरम

केरल 679,321

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

65

6400030388

14.10.2015

कमाली डायमंड एंड गोड एल एल पी

िवजया िबडYग,29/866 बी मावूर रोड

कोज़ीpोड

केरला- 673 016

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

66

6400030489

14.10.2015

वाज़मटिEल Iवैलस1

yम नं / 45 कॉR6ले-स पास करतु

कु3रशु िपरावम- मुवाEुपुज़ रोड, िपरावम

एना1कुलम

केरल 686,664

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

67

6400030792

22.10.2015

zदस1 Iवैलस1

डोर नं. XIII/521(ओड),XII/546( यू)

काचेरी जंगषन,अRबलापुTजा

आला6पुज़ा

केरल- 688561

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

68

6400030893

22.10.2015

इलाEूर Iवैलस1

Mी नारायण िबडYग yम नं नंबर 2/261

िनयर %टेट बjक ओफ इडीया इलाEुर

कोषीpोड

केरला- 673 303

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

69

6400031087

28.10.2015

बीसिमला Iवैलस1

िबडYग नं के पी 3/572

कुलाEु6पुIहा पी ओ

कोलम

केरला- 691317

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

70

6400031188

28.10.2015

परावती Iवेलरी

टी.सी. 38/1716, (ओएलडी 45/1082)

चालाई बाजरा, चाला पीओ

ितyवनंतपुरम

केरला- 695036

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940

4289

71

6400031289

28.10.2015

यू कनाकमहाल Iवेलरी

डोर नं 1/151/152,मुpम wाम पंजायत

कािलpट रोड,मुpम पी ओ

कोिषpोट

केरल - 673602

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

72

6400031390

28.10.2015

पािवIहं Iवेलरी

िबडYग नं .VII/168

मुनिस6पाल िबडYग

पुनालूर

कोलम

केरल- 691 305

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

73

6400031491

28.10.2015

के आर एस गोड Iवैलस1

डोर नं III/767 ओपोिसट बस %टjड

चेy6पुलाशेरी पी ओ

पालाpाट

केरल - 679 503

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

74

6400031592

28.10.2015

जनता फाशन Iवैलस1

एस बी टी िबडYग मेयीन रोड

वडाpानचेरी

Hीशूर

केरल - 680 582

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

75

6400031592

28.10.2015

जनता फाशन गोड सु6पर माक1ट

1/565 सी टी िल}ील ˆवर कोणवेट

जंगशन

मेयीन रोट,चेलpरा

Hीशूर

केरल- 680 586

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

76

6400031794

28.10.2015

जनता फाशन Iवैलस1

तोफp िबडYग ओटु6पारा

10/1065,1066

Hीशूर

केरल- 680 582

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

77

6400031895

28.10.2015

वनीता Iवेलरी

चावpाट

Hीशूर

केरल- 680506

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

78

6400031996

28.10.2015

Iवल सी3ट

डोर नंबर 730 ए कुडुकटवू रोड

पु|ायूरकुलम

िHशूर

केरल-679 561

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

79

6400032089

28.10.2015

शािलमार Iवेलरी

XIV/560 आलEरा सेटर

िHशूर

केरल- 679561

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

80

6400032190

28.10.2015

चैत या Iवेलरी

वेलीयनकोट पो|ानी

मला6पुरम

केरल - 679 579

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

4290

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

81

6400032291

28.10.2015

अरामना गोड ए{ड डायमंडस

VII/220,िच†टुवा रोड,चावpाट पी ओ

िHशूर

केरल - 680506

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

82

6400032392

28.10.2015

बी गोड

के एम सी IV/162 ए,21िनयर यू बस

%टेट

कासरागोट

केरल- 671121

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

83

6400032897

30.10.2015

वनाता Iवेलरी

आलाा पु|यूरकुलम

िHशूर

केरल - 679 561

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

84

6400032998

30.10.2015

गीता Iवेलरी

डोर नं एम पी VI 417 मैसूर रोड

मानंतावाडी पी ओ

वायनाड

केरल 670645

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

85

6400033091

30.10.2015

चे|लूर Iवेलरी

ओ पी II/591,िनयर चे|लूर फाशन

मारि`बलस

ओि‚रा

कोलम

केरल- 690419

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

86

6400033192

30.10.2015

सलाला गड ए{ड डायमंडस

वी पी 9/356,इलाRमरामं रोड,

इडाXव{णा6पारा

मला6पुरम

केरल- 673 645

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

87

6400033293

30.10.2015

नवार‰ा Iवैलस1

िबडYग नंबर एम पी VII-351 ए स (1)

टेpान कॉR6ले-स िनयर बस %टjड, मैयीन

क{णूर

केरल- 670602

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

88

6400033697

06.11.2015

मुबारक फाशन गोड

डोर नंबर 6/113सी, कु|ुम6पुरम

कु†टुर नोथ1 पी ओ

मला6पुरम

केरल - 676305

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

89

6400033798

06.11.2015

सानीला Iवेलरी

44/1706,07,08,मेयीन रोड, तलाशेरी

क{णूर

केरल- 670101

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

90

6400033899

06.11.2015

हैमा फाशन Iवेलरी

मला6पुरम पी ओ

एना1कुलम

केरल- 682 511

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

91

6400033903

06.11.2015

कारतीका Iवेलरी

डोर नं 13/486 (ओड 790/3)

तेकेनटा

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

आई एस

1417:2016

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940

4291

कोटुगलूर

िHशूर

केरल- 680664

एवं मुहरांकन

92

6400034093

06.11.2015

के पी वाकŠ Iवेलरी

डोर नं ( यू 23/783/784) (ओड नं.

1159)

गोड सू6पर माक1ट,तोडु6पुज़ा

ओ6पो, Iयोदी सु6पर माक1ट,

इडुp

केरल-685 584

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

93

6400034194

06.11.2015

के पी वाकŠ Iवेलरी

िबडYग नंबर 2/1244 गोड सुपर माक1ट

बस %टjड रोड कट6पना

इडुp

केरल - 685 508

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

94

6400034295

06.11.2015

के पी वाकŠ Iवेलरी

गोड माक1ट,

िनयर लूक आई आ%पताल ए एम रोड,

पेyबावूर

एरणाकुलम

केरल- 683 542

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

95

6400034699

23.11.2015

सुव1णा Iवेलरी

कुलाEु6पुIहा,िबडYग नं के पी III/570

कोलम

केरल- 691310

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

96

6400034703

23.11.2015

जसीना Iवेलरी

के पी 1/832 िनयर जी वी एच एस एस

कलरा,

कलरा पी ओ

ितyवनंतापुरम

केरल 695 608

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

97

6400034804

23.11.2015

मूSत गोड हाऊस

िबडYग नं VIII/494 मेयीन रोड िचरा6पु

िHशूर

केरल-680 561

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

98

6400034905

23.11.2015

अpरा Iवेलरी

मेयीन कु3रया‚ीरा

िHशूर

केरल- 680006

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

99

6400035095

23.11.2015

िवनायका Iवेलरी

बी%मी कॉR6ले-स(ओड नं II/1655, यू

XVII/506)

मेयीन रोड, पतना6पुरम

को}यम

केरल- 689 695

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

100

6400035604

10.12.2015

अराफ़ा गोड

िनयर जुमा मि%जद चाला

ितyवनंतापुरम

केरल- 695 036

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

4292

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

101

6400035705

10.12.2015

िचHा गोड पालस

काटाpटा

ितyवनंतापुरम

केरल- 695572

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

102

6400035806

10.12.2015

ए आर Iवेलरी

तेिŒयिलpल

डोर नं एन पी V/250 ए{ड 251

तेŒयाला, ितyराङडी

मला6पुरम

केरल- 676320

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

103

6400035907

10.12.2015

नासको गोड सूक

नाज टवर ,माक1ट जंगशन

को}ारpरा पी ओ

कोलम

केरल- 691506

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

104

6400036097

10.12.2015

पीयरल गोलट महाल

डोर नं िव पी XIV/1479,गोपीकृTण

िबडYग

मेयीन, बटाpानचेरी

पालpाट

केरल- 678683

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

105

6400036198

10.12.2015

आलुpास Iवेलरी

डोर 1255/2,1255/3,जोस आलुpास

िबडYग,आलुpास Iवेलरी

आर एस रोड

पालpाट

केरल - 678 001

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

106

6400036299

10.12.2015

ए स बी सीलवर

11-1703(29) टी बी रोड फाईन सेटर

िसटी-1

पालाpाट

केरल - 678001

चांदी और चांदी

िमM धातु आभूषण/

कलाकृितय

उ*कृŽता और अंकन

आई एस

2112:2014

107

6400036303

10.12.2015

वडाय|ूर गोड

डोर नं िनल 458 राजा रोड

3रलेर पी ओ

कासरागोड

केरल- 671314

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

108

6400036404

10.12.2015

टी एम एस ए टराईसस1

1 %ट,ोर XLI/115, 116 मलाबार

कॉR6ले-स

जी बी रोड

पालpाट

केरल- 678 001

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

109

6400036505

10.12.2015

सुपरणा1 Iवेलरी

डोर नं 11/31,को}6पुरम,पे}ोल

िनलेशवर

कासरागोट

केरल- 671314

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

110

6400036606

10.12.2015

कृTणा फाषन Iवेलरी

डोर नं 9/11,चेरEला पी ओ

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

आई एस

1417:2016

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940

4293

आला6पIहा

केरल- 688 524

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

111

6400036707

10.12.2015

पािवHं Iवैलस1

V/189,पेयाट पी ओ

ितyवनंतपुरम

केरल- 695 573

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

112

6400036808

10.12.2015

िवजीएबीएम गोड िलिमटेड लैिबलीटी

पाट1नर टी िशप

VII/598 एफ, ओपो बस %टाट वेङरा

मला6पुरम

केरल- 676304

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

113

6400036909

10.12.2015

सुमागली Iवैलस1

डोर नं XV/693/1 तैpाट जंगषन

गुyवायूर

िHशूर

केरल - 680 104

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

114

6400037204

21.12.2015

सुरफ Iवैलस1

हो%पीटल रोड,कोटुङलूर

िHशूर

केरल - 680664

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

115

6400037305

21.12.2015

अदहार गोड पेयाzा एल एल पी

डोर नं 12/1309-1315, वडाpङडी

िबडYग,

कालीpट रोड,पेरंzा

कोिशpोट

केरल- 673 525

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

116

6400037406

22.12.2015

पीरामेल पािवIहं Iवेलरी

ओ‚नतुyE पी ओ वैिपन

एरणाकुलम

केरल- 682508

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

117

6400037507

22.12.2015

डीवीन गोड

कालीpट इनpाईव,1%ट ोर 5/3129 बी

5,बी 6

यू के एस रोड

कोषीpोट

केरल- 673001

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

118

6400038004

13.01.2016

कािवता गोड ए{ड डायीमेट

डोर नं XVI/283 टू 294, कालीpट रोड

वेलानचेरी,मला6पुरम

केरल- 676552

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

119

6400038105

13.01.2016

अनुमोद फाषन जुवस

डोर नं XVI/283 टू 294,कालीकट रोड

वेलाचेरी

मला6पुरम

केरल-676 552

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

4294

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

120

6400038206

13.01.2016

िमना Iवेलरी

डोर नं.6/416,ओड मैसूर रोड

मान दवाडी पी ओ

वायनाट

केरल- 670645

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

121

6400038307

13.01.2016

तकस Iवेलरी

डोर नं VIII/580.ितyव|ा पी ओ

ितyव|ा,वयानाड

केरल- 670645

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

122

6400038408

13.01.2016

मलाबार फाषन Iवेलरी

डोर नं VIII/395बी,पटी5ारीEरा पी ओ

मान तावीडी

केरल- 673 575

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

123

6400038509

13.01.2016

अफसल गोड सुक

डोर नं X/1256ई,िनयर vापार भवन

बटीयाटका रोट

कुRबलारोड पी ओ

कोसरगोड

केरल- 671 321

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

124

6400038610

13.01.2016

एन जी डी जुवस

yम नं III/872 बी सी Hीशूर रोड

वैलानचेरी,मल6पुराम

केरल- 676552

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

125

6400038711

13.01.2016

िज़या गोड

अpरामाल, कॉR6ले-स

593-ओ,593-एन,कुyबEूर के पी IV

ताली6परा`बा

क{णूर

केरल- 670142

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

126

6400038812

13.01.2016

पुTपलता Iवेलरी

VII/271,माक1ट रोड VII,उ*मा पी ओ

कासरागोड

केरल 671319

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

127

6400038905

13.01.2016

ध या Iवेलरी

डोर नं .XIV/16,पुEेन6पली

अ‘ीpोट,कोडुङलूर

Hीशूर

केरल- 680666

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

128

6400039006

13.01.2016

िवकिलयामान Iवेलस1

ए पी /ए-स / 5, कोलम, चेनकोटा रोड,

कज़’थुyटी पीओ

कोलम

केरल 691,309

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

129

6400039107

13.01.2016

मोिथरवली Iवेलरी

िनयर सरकार हॉि%पटल रोड, पाव:र

पीओ

क{णूर

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940

4295

केरल 670673

130

6400039208

13.01.2016

कोलातुकुडी Iवेलरी

डूर नं . 391/11, मनजपरा पीओ

एना1कुलम

केरल 683581

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

131

6400039309

13.01.2016

राजकुमारी गोड सूक और सुपर माकƒट

िब@डग नं.एन पी .14 / 723 मेयीन रोड

कलामांबलम पीओ

ितyवनंतपुरम

केरल- 695605

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

132

6400039511

14.01.2016

म%कैट Iवैलरी

डूर नं .17/306, कुEु6पराब1

क{णूर

केरल- 670643

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

133

6400039612

22.01.2016

यू िचलका जुवस

VII / 758, रेलवे %टेशन रोड, अलुवा

एना1कुलम

केरल- 683101

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

134

6400039705

22.01.2016

^%टल जुवस

टी.सी.38/1222(14), वलायल चे}ी

%„ीट,

चालै पी ओ

ितyवनंतपुरम

केरल- 695036

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

135

6400039806

22.01.2016

थैचपाली Iवेलरी

पलुyथी, को‚ी

एना1कुलम

केरल- 682006

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

136

6400039907

22.01.2016

शादी गोड और डायमंuस

10/545, नदुव|ूर पी ओ

कोिझकोड

केरल- 673614

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

137

6400040088

22.01.2016

पला“ही जेवेलेस1

वैTणवम िब@डग 45( यू330)

इज़हीकाकाटG जन.ह3रपाद,ह3रपादII

( यूIX)

अल6पुज़हा

केरला-690514

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

138

6400040189

22.10.2016

ऑफ़लjड गोड और डायमंuस

डोर नं। 9/314 ए, 314 बी, ऑफ़लjड

आकƒड,

अथानी, एथोली

कोिझकोड

केरल- 673315

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

139

6400040290

22.10.2016

लxमी Iवेलरी

िब@डग नो-XIII / 544 ए, कोडुंगलूर,

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

आई एस

1417:2016

4296

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

िHशूर

केरल 680,664

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

140

6400040391

22.01.2016

संगीता फैशन Iवेलरी

डूर नं. टी पी /11/77(ओड),IV/95( यू),

अचायूमूड, पे3रनाड पीओ

कोलम

केरल 691,601

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

141

6400040492

22.01.2016

संगीता आभूषण

अचायूमूड , पे3रनाड पीओ

कोलम

केरल 691,601

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

142

6400040593

22.01.2016

zादर Iवेलरी

वाड1 नं .1 / 375, मंगलम पीओ,

ीकुनुनपुझा

आल6पुIहा

केरल 690,515

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

143

6400040694

22.01.2016

फरदौस गोड पटाबी एलएलपी

डोर नं .XII / 316-385 दुबई गोड ए{ड

डायमंuस, पे3रनथलम|ा रोड, प}ंबी

पलpड़

केरल 679,303

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

144

6400040795

22.01.2016

फरदौस गोड वैल$चेरी एलएलपी

वी पी 11/1003 जीएच, आईएसटी ए{ड

िBतीय ोर, कतर 6लाजा, वलंचरी

मल6पुरम

केरल 676,552

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

145

6400040896

22.01.2016

फरदौस %वण1 रामनEुpरा एलएलपी

कलकpन िब@डग, 700-ए ए{ड 700-बी,

बस %टjड, कैिलकट रोड, रमनतुpरा

कोिझकोड

केरल 673,633

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

146

6400041292

02.02.2016

थारकंस सुइस Iवेलरी

चावpड़

िHशूर

केरल 680,506

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

147

6400041393

02.02.2016

अनुwा Iवेलरी

को}पादी रोड, पैरा, पीओ पेy`बाडा6पा

मल6पुरम

केरल 679,580

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

148

6400041494

02.02.2016

कनकम Iवेलरी

बस %टड जंकशन, चावpड़

िHशूर

केरल- 680506

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

149

6400041595

02.02.2016

टी टी Iवेलरी

इ|मावू रोड, चावpड़

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

आई एस

1417:2016

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940

4297

िHशूर

केरल- 680506

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

150

6400041696

02.02.2016

वरनाम Iवैलरी

पुथानपली, पेy`बाडा6पा

मल6पुरम

केरल 679580

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

151

6400041797

02.02.2016

थारकन Iवेलरी

डूर नं VII / 150 जी, चावpड़

िHशूर

केरल 680506

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

152

6400041898

02.02.2016

ए पी.बालकृTणिपलै

13/250, पलायम रोड

कोजिहकोडे

केरला-673001

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

153

6400041999

02.02.2016

Mीxमी गोड एंड डायमंuस

रेलवे %टेशन रोड

माही

पोडीचेरी- 673310

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

154

6400042092

02.02.2016

Mीवलसं गोड एंड डायमंuस ाइवेट

िलिमटेड

राज%वम िब@डग 571 / ए, बस %टjड

कोनी, पथानामिथ}ा मेयीन रोड

पथानामिथ}ा

केरल 689,513

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

155

6400042193

02.02.2016

फरदौस %वण1 चेRमाट ाईवेट िलिमटेड

(दुबई गोड और डायमंuस), टीपीवी /

851,859, मुCय सड़क चेRमाद, ितyरगढ़ी

पीओ

मला6पुरम

केरल 676,306

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

156

6400042799

09.02.2016

फरदौस गहने और हीरे ाइवेट िलिमटेड

21/621, डी, ई, एफ, जी, स$„ल टॉवर,

डाउनिहल

मल6पुरम

केरल 676,519

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

157

6400042803

09.02.2016

%वण—जली गोड पाक1

दरवाजा सं .XIII / 88-4,5 और 6,

कापेटा Rयूिनिसपिलटी

वायनाड

केरल 673,121

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

158

6400042904

09.02.2016

%वमवरा Iवेलस1

ए-स / 532 एफ, मालीकाRपेदीका,

अलागढ़ पीओ, अलुवा

एना1कुलम

केरल- 683511

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

4298

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

159

6400043094

09.02.2016

%काई गोड

yम नं पीएमसी VI / 285, ओ पी पी

नाशनल कॉलेज, पेy`बा, पेयानूर पीओ

क{णूर

केरल- 670307

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

160

6400043195

09.02.2016

%काई गोड

yम नं केसीपी XIII, 1604 ए,

कज़हर चावशेरी पंचायत,

मेयीन रोड,ई3रटी

क{णूर

केरल- 670703

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

161

6400043296

09.02.2016

%वपन फैशन Iवेलरी

नीyगल (िब@डग), एस। कोलमाशेरी

एना1कुलम

केरल- 602033

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

162

6400043397

09.02.2016

कोइकल Iवेलस1

32/73, पाक1 जं-शन, कायमुकलम

आल6पुIहा

केरल 690,502

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

163

6400043498

09.02.2016

डेज़ डायमंuस िलिमटेड

पाथयापुरा िब@डग, राउंड साउथ

िHशूर

केरल- 680001

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

164

6400043599

09.02.2016

कोइकल Iवेलस1

एच पी 8/509, मुCय सड़क ह3रपपद

आल6पुIहा

केरल- 690514

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

165

6400043906

08.02.2016

कुRबुpाल फाषन Iवेलस1

वाTज़ूर पीओ

को}ायम

केरल- 686504

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

166

6400044096

18.02.2016

िनवेदयम Iवेलस1

711/399/400, मालाइंकज़ू पीओ

ितyवनंतपुरम

केरल- 695571

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

167

640004419

18.02.2016

अरबीयन Iवेलस1

एन एच रोड, कyनाग6पली

कोलम

केरल- 691001

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

168

6400044208

18.02.2016

मे„ो गोड एंड डायमंuस

4/93 (4/1533), पुलु6लमम रोड,

फोट1को‚ी पी ओ

कु|ु6पुरम

एना1कुलम

केरल- 682001

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

169

6400044399

18.02.2016

अरबी Iवेलस1

कुRपाहा रोड

पथानामिथ}ा

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

आई एस

1417:2016

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940

4299

केरल- 689645

एवं मुहरांकन

170

6400044403

18.02.2016

िवजयककृTण गोड

चा˜मंगलम, कोटकरकर

कोलम

केरल 691,534

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

171

6400044807

25.02.2016

चेममानूर गोड पालेस इंटरनेशनल

िलिमटेड

बॉबी चेमैनूर माSजन मुˆत िमनी Iवैलस1

वेटूर आरकेट के एस आर टी सी बस %टjड,

मेयीन से ील बोड1

एटुमानूर

को}यम

केरल- 686631

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

172

6400045098

03.03.2016

हाईनस Iवेलरी

XX/ 1080-1081, रेषमा िब@डग,

तेजहेपालम, ितyर

मल6पुरम

केरल 676,101

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

173

6400045199

03.03.2016

राजधानी जेवेलेस1

डोर नं.टी.एम 20/1140-41, थैहेपालम,

ितfर

मल6पुरम

केरला-676101

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

174

6400045203

03.03.2016

मुगल Iवेलस1

परापणगढ़ी रोड, तनूर

मल6पुरम

केरल- 676302

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

175

6400045304

03.03.2016

अमाडेना Iवेलरी

11/530 जी, आलिEयूर पीओ, ितyर

मल6पुरम

केरल 676,102

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

176

6400045406

03.03.2016

अजे था Iवेलस1

बी नं.VI/434 ,ियापुरम, पो%ट पंचािH,

ितyर

मल6पुरम

केरल 676,105

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

177

6400045506

03.03.2016

सुधा गोड

डूर नं .10 / 293, सी3ट पाक1 से र,

एज़हर रोड, ितyर

मल6पुरम

केरल 676 101

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

178

6400045607

03.03.2016

अमृथा गोड एंड डायमंड

अमृत िब@डग, 14/158,

CHETTPPADI, 14।

मल6पुरम

केरल 676,319

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

4300

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

179

6400046609

03.03.2016

ताजमहल गोड सुपरमाकƒट ाईवेट

िलिमटेड

डोर नं IV / 380 पास पो%ट ऑफस,

मेलतूर

मल6पुरम

केरल 679,326

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

180

6400045809

04.03.2016

अराब गोड एंड डायमंuस ाइवेट

िलिमटेड

एस पी XIX / 1365,1366,1367, अडूर,

भरिणकावू, स%तमकोटा पीओ

कोलम

केरल 690,521

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

181

6400045910

04.03.2016

काला Iवेलरी

अलाथा, पु योरकुलम

िHशूर

केरल 679,561

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

182

6400046003

04.03.2016

कोियलाट गोड और डायमंuस

टी पी 11/413 और 414 ओपो िवलेज

काया1लय काचेरी, परमबथ थलकुलतूर

कोिझकोड

केरल 673,317

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

183

6400046104

04.03.2016

अिलना Iवेलरी

कुyपली जयंती वाधुथला, िचEूर रोड,

कोची

एना1कुलम

केरल 682,023

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

184

6400046205

04.03.2016

फैजल Iवेलस1

इज़हर रोड, ितyर

मल6पुरम

केरल 676,101

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

185

6400046306

04.03.2016

%वारना Iवेलरी

3 / 953-2 भारत के राIय बjक, िसिवल

लैन रोड, वजाpला, िHककार पीओओ

एना1कुलम

केरल 682,021

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

186

6400046407

04.03.2016

Mी कृTण गोड और डायमंuस

yम नं 6 टी डी बी िब@डग, ए सी रोड,

चेरथला

आल6पुIहा

केरल 688,524

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

187

6400046508

04.03.2016

मािनwाम Iवेलरी

ओयूर

कोलम

केरल 691,510

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

188

6400046710

10.03.2016

फाितमा गोड एंड डायमंड

िब@डग नं .7 / 101 बी, कोलाथुर,

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

आई एस

1417:2016

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940

4301

कुyपित, मोरpन पंचायत

मल6पुरम

केरल 679,338

एवं मुहरांकन

189

6400046811

10.03.2016

नावीन Iवेलरी

िब@डग नं XIII / 273, पाRपाकुडा पीओ

एना1कुलम

केरल 686,667

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

190

6400046912

15.03.2016

%वैपना Iवेलरी

िवझुर पीओ, इडायहं

को}यम

केरल 686,144

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

191

6400047005

15.03.2016

एम एस गोड $ डायमंuस

थवाpल कॉR6ले-स-इ3रटी केसीपी XIII /

1613 ए 27-32 ए 48-51463, ए 64,

इ3रटी

क{णूर

केरल 670,703

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

192

6400047106

15.03.2016

सौRया Iवैलरी

पीपी 12/582, ओपो संकर ि-लिनक,

पेरंzा पीओ

कोिझकोड

केरल 673,525

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

193

6400047207

15.03.2016

कृTणा गोड सॉक

कु3}पुरम रोड, वैलंचेरी

मल6पुरम

केरल 676,552

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

194

6400047308

15.03.2016

आरच1ना Iवेलरी

मेियन रोड

कोलम

केरल 691,001

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

195

6400047409

15.03.2016

बीमा Iवेलरी

आयूर, आयूर पीओ

कोलम

केरल 691,533

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

196

6400047510

15.03.2016

एनटीएम Iवेलरी

20/123, पांिडpड़ रोड, मंजेरी

मल6पुरम

केरल -676121

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

197

6400047611

15.03.2016

दक दीद Iवेलरी

इजहावसमजं िब@डग, च$ डमंगलम

जं-शन, एन परावूर

एना1कुलम

केरल 683513

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

198

6400047712

15.03.2016

चुगत गोड ए{ड डायमंuस

चुंगथ िब@डग मेयीन रोड, इtरजलाकुडा

िHशूर

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

आई एस

1417:2016

4302

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

[सं. के ीय माणन िवभाग/13 : 13]

के. कदरवेल, वै5ािनक ‘एफ’ एवं मुख

MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

(Department of Consumer Affairs)

(BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS)

(KOCHI BRANCH)

Kochi, the 12th June, 2018

S.O. 971.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (5) of the regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards

(Certification) Regulation 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars of

which are given in the following schedule:

केरल 680125

एवं मुहरांकन

199

6400048007

18.03.2016

दी6थी Iवेलरी

XII/ 409, से ल जे-शन, राजकुमारी

पीओ, राजकुमारी

इडुp

केरल 685619

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

200

6400048108

18.03.2016

महार गोड स$टर

हाई%कूल रोड, िानोज़े पीओ,

अलाथीयूर

मल6पुरम

केरल 676,102

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

201

6400048310

22.03.2016

अल फाड1न Iवेलस1

मुCय सड़क, कोडुवली

कोिझकोड

केरल 673,572

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

202

6400048411

28.03.2016

एटलस गोड इंटरनेशनल

पेयानुर मॉल, जी ओ वी टी हॉि%पटल

रोड, पेयानूर

क{णूर

केरल 670,307

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

203

6400048512

28.03.2016

एजेरी पीएआई

टीसी नं .04 / 3046,3047 zॉडवे

एना1कुलम

केरल 682,031

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

204

6400048605

28.03.2016

चुंगथ गोड

चुंगथ Iवेलरी, अलुवा रोड, अगमाली

एना1कुलम

केरल 683,572

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

205

6400048706

28.03.2016

िडजाइनर Iवैलस1

पैरापंगाजी रोड, पीओ तनूर

मल6पुरम

केरल 676,302

%वण1 एवं %वण1

िमMधातुएं आभूषण/

िशपाकारी शु0ता

एवं मुहरांकन

आई एस

1417:2016

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940

4303

SCHEDULE

Licence granted during 01.07.2015 to 31.03.2016

Sl.

No.

Licence No.

Grant Date

Name & Address of the Party

(Factory)

Title of the Standard

IS No./

Part/Sec./Part

1

6400021185

02.07.2015

JASMINE JEWELLERS

VP 1/298 CHOONAD JN.

ELIPPAKULAM P.O

VALLIKUNNAM

ALAPPUZHA

KERALA- 690503

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

2

6400021589

08/07/2015

MAZRA GOLD

B.P.4/838L,NEAR REGISTRAR

OFFICE BALUSSERY

CALICUT

KOZHIKODE

KERALA-673612

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

3

6400021690

08/07/2015

ILLATHU JEWELLERY

DOOR NO 14/207 (OLD 6/846C)

THANEERMUKKOM P.O

CHERTHALA

ALAPPUZHA

KERALA-688527

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

4

6400021791

15/07/2015

ALAIKKA GOLD JEWELLERY

KARINKALLATHANI,

KANJIRAMUKKU

MALAPPURAM

KERALA- 679584

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

5

6400021892

15/07/2015

AMAR GOLD AND

DIAMONDS

SMART CENTRE BUILDING

NEAR PRIVATE BUS STAND

MALA

THRISSUR

KERALA-680732

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

6

6400021993

15/07/2015

PALATHINGAL JEWELLERY

DOOR NO.X/561

NAYARAGADY,VYLATHUR

P.O NHAMANGHAAT

THRISSUR

KERALA-679563

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

7

6400022086

20/07.2015

CHITHRA JEWELLERY

DOOR NO IV/108-A

CHANGARAMKULAM

ALANKODE P.O

MALAPPURAM

KERALA-679591

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

8

6400022187

20/07/2015

DHANALAKSHMI

JEWELLERY

T.C 37/883 RAJADHANI

BUILDING, FORT, FORT P.O

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

KERALA-695023

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

4304

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

9

6400022288

20/07/2015

BHIMA AND BROTHER

BULLION PRIVATE LIMITED

BHIMA TOWER,1526/700A

TRIVANDRUM ROAD NEAR

RAILWAY STATION,KOLLAM

KOLLAM

KERALA-691001

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

10

6400022389

20/07/2015

BHIMA AND BROTHER

BULLION PRIVATE LIMITED

BHIMA BUILDING,779-

1,NEAR KSRTC BUS STAND

PALAKKAD

KERALA-678014

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

11

6400022490

20/07/2015

BHIMA AND BROTHER

BULLION PRIVATE LIMITED

BHIMA BUILDING,779-

1,NEAR KSRTC BUS STAND

PALAKKAD

KERALA-678014

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

12

6400022591

22/07/2015

REJITH JEWELLERY

NEAR RAILWAY GATE P.P

XIV/452(OLD) P.P XVIII-

19(NEW) PAPPINISSSERI

KANNUR

KERALA-670561

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

13

6400022692

22/07/2015

STAR JEWELLERY

DOOR NO.

XI/633(NEW)VI/113(OLD)

PUNNAYOORKULAM P.O

THRISSUR

KERALA-679561

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

14

6400022793

22/07/2015

C.P.A JEWELLERY

BUILDING NO

EP5/729A(OLD),10/1039(NEW)

C.P.A JUNCTION, EDAVANNA

MALAPPURAM

KERALA-676541

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

15

6400022894

22/07/2015

PULICKENS JEWELLERY

XX-609,MAIN ROAD CHERPU,

CHERPU P.O

THRISSUR

KERALA-680561

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

16

6400022995

22/07/2015

KOCHUVEETIL LEKSHMI

JEWELLERY

BASELIOUS HOSPITAL ROAD

KOTHAMANGALAM

ERNAKULAM

KERALA-686691

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

17

6400023088

22.07.2015

SWAPNA JEWELLERS

PADA SOUTH,MAIN ROAD

KARUNAGAPPALY

KOLLAM

KERALA-690518

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

18

6400023189

22.07.2015

CHIRAKKAL GOLD

MUTTICHUKKARAN,529B

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

IS 1417 :

2016

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940

4305

CHERPU

GRAMAPANCHAYATH,XVII

CHERPU

THRISSUR

KERALA-680561

fineness and marking -

19

6400023492

24.07.2015

CHITHRA JEWELLERS

VMC 17/47 DENA COMPLEX

PUTHANCHANDHA

VARKALA

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

KERALA-695141

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

20

6400023593

31.07.2015

THRISSUR JEWELLERS

A.P.XII-324 ALUMMOODU

KANIYAPURAM P.O

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

KERALA-695301

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

21

6400023694

31.07.2015

JOYALUKKAS INDIA

PRIVATE LIMITED

MAIN ROAD,ANGAMALY

ERNAKULAM

KERALA-683572

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

22

6400023997

06.08.2015

MALABAR GOLD &

DIAMONDS

DOOR NO.XX/441/1,2

SANKARA IYYER JUNCTION

M.G ROAD

THRISSUR

KERALA-680004

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

23

6400024090

06.08.2015

PUTHOOR FASHION

JEWELLERS

VI/416.U.V KALLARAKKAL

SHOPPING CENTRE TEMPLE

ROAD THRIPRAYAR P.O

NATTIKA

THRISSUR

KERALA-680566

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

24

6400024292

10.08.2015

NICHU GOLD

10/210E,OPP:URUVACHAL,

MEDICAL8,10 URUVACHAL

P.O

KANNUR

KERALA-670702

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

25

6400024393

10.08.2015

PALLITHARA JEWELLERS

MAREENA SHOPPING

CENTRE NATIONAL

HIGHWAY THALIPARAMBA

P.O

KANNUR

KERALA-670141

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

26

6400024595

06.08.2015

KAIRALI JEWELLERS

KAIRALI AUDITORIUM

VARKALA

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

KERALA-695141

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

4306

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

27

6400024696

10.08.2015

MALABAR ORNAMENTS

PVT.LTD

43/1095A,B,A.V.K.NAIR ROAD

THALASSERY

KANNUR

KERALA-670101

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

28

6400024797

10.08.2015

RIDHAN GOLD

TEEKEY SHOPPING

COMPLEX VP5/539B,

VAZHAKKAD P.O ,

MALAPPURAM

KERALA-673604

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

29

6400024898

10.08.2015

NEW ARABIAN GOLD PARK

DOOR NO.VIII/1523 BYE PASS

JUNCTION ,KONDOTTY

MALAPPURAM

KERALA-673638

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

30

6400024999

10.08.2015

ALAKKAPPILLIL JEWELLERS

ALAKKAPPILLIL COMPLEX

318A,AMBALLOOR

KANJIRAMATTOM

ERNAKULAM

KERALA-682315

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

31

6400025092

10.08.2015

DIYA GOLD PERAMBRA

ROOM NO.8/761,762

PERAMBRA, PERAMBRA P.O

KOZHIKODE

KERALA-673525

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

32

6400025193

10.08.2015

CHEERAMKUZHIYIL

JEWELLERS

PPX/477,PAYYAVOOR P.O

KANNUR

KERALA-670633

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

33

6400026094

17.08.2015

CHEMMANUR GOLD PALACE

INTERNATIONAL LIMITED

K PX/335 S, 335 D, D1, D2, D4,

335 E-H PULICKAL BUILDING

CHENNATTUMATTOM

JUNCTION, KATTAPPANA

IDUKKI

KERALA-685508

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

34

6400026195

17.08.2015

ALUKKAS JEWELLERY

M.O ROAD THRISSUR

THRISSUR

KERALA-680001

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

35

6400026296

17.08.2015

DUBAI GOLD

B:NO:9/1611TO 9/1619

CITYMARK OPP. GOVT.

HOSPITAL PATTAMBI ROAD

CHERUPULASSERY

PALAKKAD

KERALA-679503

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

36

6400026397

18.08.2015

CHILANKA JEWELLERS

DOOR NO.12/997.G.B ROAD

PALAKKAD

PALAKKAD

KERALA-678001

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940

4307

37

6400026498

18.08.2015

LAKSHMI JEWELLERY

DOOR NO.15/964 COURT

ROAD ALATHUR,ALATHUR

P.O

PALAKKAD

KERALA-678541

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

38

6400026599

18.08.2015

BHARGAVI GOLD CENTER

DOOR NO. VII/647

KALADIKODE

PALAKKAD

KERALA-678596

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

39

6400026704

04.09.2015

BHIMA JEWELS A UNIT OF

BHIMA BOUTIQUE PVT.LTD

DOOR NO.34/40A,BYPASS

ROAD EDAPPALLY,COCHIN

ERNAKULAM

KOCHI

KERALA-682024

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

40

6400026805

07.09.2015

AMANA GOLD

DOOR NO.XVI/650

POOVATHANI ROAD

KARINKALLATHANI

TACCANATUKARA

CHETHALLOOR P.O

PALAKKAD

KERALA-678609

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

41

6400026906

07.09.2015

A P S JEWELLERY

T.C. 8/1624,THIRUMALA

P.O,THIRUMALA 695006

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

KERALA-695006

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

42

6400027096

07.09.2015

NEW SONAS JEWELLERY

PUNNILATH IBRAHIMKUTTY

MEMORIALSHOPPING

COMPLEX, VII/165B,U BAZAR

JUNCTION ERIYAD

VII,ERIYAD P.O

THRISSUR

KERALA-680666

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

43

6400027197

07.09.2015

ISHAN JEWELS PALACE LLP

STADIUM BUILDING,

18/53D,E KOYILANDY,18,

KOYILANDY P.O

KOZHIKODE

KERALA-673305

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

44

6400027298

07.09.2015

ISHA GOLD ORNAMENTS LLP

CENTURY COMPLEX, B.P

4/978 M N P,MAIN ROAD

BALUSSERY 7, BALUSSERY

P.O

KOZHIKODE

KERALA-673612

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

45

6400027399

07.09.2015

ZAM ZAM JEWELLERS

DOOR NO.15/723,PT

COMMERCIAL BUILDING,

THAZEKODE P.O

KARINKALATHANI

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

4308

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

MALAPPURAM

KERALA-679322

46

6400027403

07.09.2015

VAISALI JEWELLERS

PATTAMBI ROAD, EDAPAL

MALAPPURAM

KERALA-679576

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

47

6400027605

09.09.2015

MILAN GOLD & DIAMONDS

19/115 A28,29,30,31 A28TO31

TRIPRANGODE

PANCHAYATH, 19,

ALATHIYUR

MALAPPURAM

KERALA-676102

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

48

6400027706

09.09.2015

LEKSHMI JEWELLERS

EDAPPON,AYIRANIKUDI

ALAPPUZHA

KERALA-690558

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

49

6400027807

09.09.2015

MELEPPATTE GOLD

XIV/482,MEENANGADI-

GRAMA PANCHAYATH

MEENAGADI P.O

WAYANAD

KERALA-673591

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

50

6400027908

09.09.2015

NEDIYANAD GOLD

DOOR NO NP

11/945,IX/581(OLD)

NEDIYANAD

BUILDING,NARIKUNI P.O

KOZHIKODE

KERALA-673585

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

51

6400028098

09.09.2015

DEEPA GOLD

DOOR NO 111/505(OLD) DOOR

NO.111/1 (NEW) MUNCIPAL

COMPLEX

KASARAGOD

KERALA-671121

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

52

6400028506

21.092015

NEW BISMI FASHION

JEWELLERY

BISMI PLAZA,BP 111/1628

MAIN ROAD

BALARAMAPURAM P.O

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

KERALA-695501

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

53

6400028607

21.09.2015

MUNDATTU FASHION

JEWELLERY

XIII/220 TEMPLE POINT

VANNAPURAM

IDUKKI

KERALA-685607

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

54

6400028708

21.09.2015

KAIRALI JEWELLERS

NH-47,TRIVANDRUM ROAD

KALLAMBALAM

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

KERALA-695605

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940

4309

55

6400028809

21.09.2015

KRISHNA JEWELLER'S

LAYOLA ROAD,

SREEKARIYAM

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

KERALA-695017

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

56

6400028910

21.09.2015

NITHIN SILVER PALACE

T.B JUNCTION,

MUVATTUPUZA

ERNAKULAM

KERALA-686661

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

57

6400029003

22.09.2015

MANJALLY JEWELLERS

10/1268-123 NEAR NEW

CHURCH,THRISSUR

THRISSUR

KERALA-680001

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

58

6400029407

01.10.2015

PUNATHIL JEWELLERY

DOOR

NO.IV/554(OLD),IV/444(NEW)

OPP.POST OFFICE MAIN

ROAD,PULPALLY P.O

WAYANAD

KERALA-673579

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

59

6400029508

01.10.2015

MALLIKAS JEWELLERY

CHANGADAM ROAD

VELIANCODE P.O

MALAPPURAM

KERALA-679579

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

60

6400029609

01.10.2015

NEW PAVIZHAM JEWELLERY

XIV/432R NEAR

WADAKANCHERY BUS

STANT CITY TOWER

BUILDING MAIN ROAD

THRISSUR

KERALA-680582

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

61

6400029710

01.10.2015

J.J.GOLD

XXVII/569,A.M.ROAD

KOTHAMANGALAM

ERNAKULAM

KERALA-686691

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

62

6400029811

01.10.2015

PARAPPATTU JEWELLERS

DOOR NO. XII/461

KV.KAKKATTU COMPLEX

OPP. SWARNATHU BUS

STAND

KIZHAKABLAM P.O

ERNAKULAM

KERALA-683562

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

63

6400029912

01.10.2015

VELAYUDHAN SONS

JEWELLERY

DOOR NO. P.P 7/15 MAIN

ROAD RAMAPURAM P.O

ANGADIPURAM (VIA)

MALAPPURAM

KERALA-679321

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

64

6400030085

01.10.2015

K.V. JEWELLERS

DOOR NO. AP-14/916,A.P

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

IS 1417 :

2016

4310

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

8/718(OLD) MAIN ROAD

ANGADIPURAM (VIA)

MALAPPURAM

KERALA-679321

fineness and marking -

65

6400030388

14.10.2015

CAMMILLI DIAMOND &

GOLD LLP

VIJAYA BUILDING,29/866B

MAVOOR ROAD,

KOZHIKODE

KERALA-673016

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

66

6400030489

14.10.2015

VAZHEMADATHIL

JEWELLERS

ROOM NO. V/45 COMPLEX

NEAR KAROTTU KURISHU

PIRAVOM- MUVATTUPUZHA

ROAD PIRAVOM

ERNAKULAM

KERALA-686664

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

67

6400030792

22.10.2015

BROTHERS JEWELLERY

DOOR NO.

XIII/521(OLD),XII/546(NEW)

KACHERY JN.

AMBALAPUZHA

ALAPPUZHA

KERALA-688561

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

68

6400030893

22.10.2015

ILLATHUR JEWELLERS

SREENARAYANA BUILDING

ROOM NO. 2/261 NEAR STATE

BANK OF INDIA ELATHUR

KOZHIKODE

KERALA- 673303

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

69

6400031087

28.10.2015

BISMILLA JEWELLERY

BUILDING NO. KP3/572

KULATHUPUZHA P.O

KOLLAM

KERALA- 691317

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

70

6400031188

28.10.2015

PARVATHY JEWELLERY

T.C 38/1716,(OLD45/1082)

CHALAI BAZAAR, CHALAI

P.O

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

KERALA- 695036

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

71

6400031289

28.10.2015

NEW KANAKAMAHAL

JEWELLERY

DOOR NO 1/151,152 MUKKAM

GRAMA PANCHAYATH

CALICUT ROAD MUKKAM

P.O

KOZHIKODE

KERALA-673602

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

72

6400031390

28.10.2015

PAVIZHAM JEWELLERY

BUILDING NO.VII/168

MUNCIPAL BUILDING

PUNALUR

KOLLAM

KERALA-691305

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940

4311

73

6400031491

28.10.2015

K R S GOLD JEWELLERS

DOOR NO.III/767 OPP. BUS

STAND, CHERPULASSERY

P.O

PALAKKAD

KERALA-679503

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

74

6400031592

28.10.2015

JANATHA FASHION

JEWELLERY

S.B.T. BUILDING MAIN ROAD,

WADAKKANCHERY

THRISSUR

KERALA-680582

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

75

6400031693

28.10.2015

JANATHA JEWELLERY GOLD

SUPER MARKET

1/565 C&D,LITTLE FLOWER

CONVENT JUNCTION MAIN

ROAD CHELAKKARA

THRISSUR

KERALA-680586

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

76

6400031794

28.10.2015

JANATHA FASHION

JEWELLERY

THOUFEEQ BUILDING

OTTUPARA 10/1065,1066

THRISSUR

KERALA-680582

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

77

6400031895

28.10.2015

VANITHA JEWELLERY

CHAVAKKAD

THRISSUR

KERALA-680506

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

78

6400031996

28.10.2015

JEWEL CITY

DOOR NO. 730-A

KUNDUKADAVU ROAD

PUNNAYOORKULAM

THRISSUR

KERALA-679561

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

79

6400032089

28.10.2015

SHALIMAR JEWELLERS

XIV/560 ALTHARA CENTRE

THRISSUR

KERALA-679561

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

80

6400032190

28.10.2015

CHITHANYA JEWELLERY

VELIANCODE,PONNANI

MALAPPURAM

KERALA-679579

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

81

6400032291

28.10.2015

ARAMANA GOLD &

DIAMONDS

VII/220,CHETTUVA ROAD

CHAVAKKAD P.O

THRISSUR

KERALA-680506

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

82

6400032392

28.10.2015

B GOLD

KMC IV/162A,21 NEAR NEW

BUS STAND

KASARAGOD

KERALA-671121

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

4312

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

83

6400032897

30.10.2015

VANITHA JEWELLERY

ALTHARA,

PUNNAYURKULAM

THRISSUR

KERALA-679561

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

84

6400032998

30.10.2015

GEETHA JEWELLERY

DOOR NO.MP VI 417 MYSOOR

ROAD MANATHAVADY P.O

WAYANAD

KERALA-670645

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

85

6400033091

30.10.2015

CHENALLOOR JEWELLERS

OP II/591,NEAR CHENALLOR

FASHION MARBLES, OCHIRA

KOLLAM

KERALA-690419

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

86

6400033192

30.10.2015

SALALA GOLD & DIAMOND

V.P. 9/356,ELAMARAM

ROAD,EDAVANNAPPARA,

MALAPPURAM

KERALA-673645

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

87

6400033293

30.10.2015

NAVARATHNA JEWELLERS

BUILDING NO. MP-VII-351

AS(1) DECCAN COMPLEX

NEAR BUS STAND, MAYYIL

KANNUR

KERALA- 670602

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

88

6400033697

06.11.2015

MUBARAK FASHION GOLD

DOOR NO. 6/113C,

KUNNUMPURAM, KUTOOR

NORTH P.O

MALAPPURAM

KERALA-676305

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

89

6400033798

06.11.2015

SANILA JEWELLERY

44/1706,07,08 MAIN ROAD,

THALASSERY

KANNUR

KERALA- 670101

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

90

6400033899

06.11.2015

HYMA FASHION JEWELLERY

MALIPURAM P.O

ERNAKULAM

KERALA-682511

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

91

6400033903

06.11.2015

KARTHIKA JEWELLERY

DOOR NO. 13/486 (OLD 790/3)

THEKEANADA,

KODUNGALOOR

THRISSUR

KERALA-680664

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

92

6400034093

06.11.2015

K.P. VARKEY JEWELLERY

DOOR NO.(NEW 23/783/784)

(OLD NO. 1159) GOLD SUPER

MARKET,

THODUPUZHA,OPP.JOTHY

SUPER MARKET

IDUKKI

KERALA-685584

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940

4313

93

6400034194

06.11.2015

K.P. VARKEY JEWELLERY

BUILDING NO.2/1244 GOLD

SUPER MARKET, BUSTAND

ROAD KATTAPPANA

IDUKKI

KERALA-685508

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

94

6400034295

06.11.2015

K.P. VARKEY JEWELLERY

GOLD SUPER MARKET, NEAR

LUKE EYE HOSPITAL A.M

ROAD, PERUMBAVOOR

ERNAKULAM

KERALA-683542

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

95

6400034699

23.11.2015

SUVARNA JEWELLERY

KULATHUPUZHA,BUILDING

NO. KP III/570

KOLLAM

KERALA-691310

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

96

6400034703

23.11.2015

JASEENA JEWELLERY

KP I/832 NEAR GVHSS

KALLARA, KALLARA P.O

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

KERALA-695608

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

97

6400034804

23.11.2015

MOORTHY GOLD HOUSE

BUILDING NO.VIII/494 MAIN

ROAD CHERPU

THRISSUR

KERALA- 680561

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

98

6400034905

23.11.2015

AKKARA JEWELLERS

MAIN ROAD, KURIACHIRA

THRISSUR

KERALA-680006

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

99

6400035095

23.11.2015

VINAYAKA JEWELLERY

BISMI COMPLEX (OLD

NO.II/1655,NEW XVII/506)

MAIN ROAD,

PATHANAPURAM

KOLLAM

KERALA- 689695

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

100

6400035604

10.12.2015

ARAFA GOLD

NEAR JUMA MASJID, CHALA

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

KERALA- 695036

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

101

6400035705

10.12.2015

CHITRA GOLD PALACE

KATTAKADA

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

KERALA 695572

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

102

6400035806

10.12.2015

A.R. JEWELLERY

THEYYALINGAL, DOOR NO.

NP V/250 AND 251,

THEYYALA, THIRURANGADI

MALAPPURAM

KERALA- 676320

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

103

6400035907

10.12.2015

NAZCO GOLD SOUK

NAZ TOWER, MARKET

JUNCTION, KOTTARAKKARA

P.O

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

4314

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

KOLLAM

KOTTARAKKARA

KERALA-691506

104

6400036097

10.12.2015

PEARL GOLD MAHAL

DOOR NO. VP-

XIV/1479,GOPIKRISHNA

BUILDING MAIN ROAD,

VADAKKENCHERRY

PALAKKAD

KERALA- 678683

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

105

6400036198

10.12.2015

ALUKKAS JEWELLERY

DOOR 1255/2,1255/3, JOS

ALUKKAS

BUILDING,ALUKKAS

JEWELLERY, R.S ROAD

PALAKKAD

KERALA- 678001

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

106

6400036299 1 10.12.2015

S.B.SILVERS

11-1703(29) TB .ROAD FINE

CENTRE,CITY-1

PALAKKAD

KERALA- 678014

Silver and Silver alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 2112 :

2014

107

6400036303

10.12.2015

VADAYANDOOR GOLD

DOOR NO.NIL 458 RAJA

ROAD NILESWAR P.O

KASARAGOD

KERALA- 671314

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

108

6400036404

10.12.2015

TMS ENTERPRISES

1ST FLOOR XLI/115,

116 MALABAR COMPLEX, GB

ROAD

PALAKKAD

KERALA- 678001

Silver and Silver alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 2112 :

2014

109

6400036505

10.12.2015

SUPARNA JEWELLEY

DOOR NO 11/31,

KOTTAPURAM, PEROLE,

NILESWAR P.O

KASARAGOD

KERALA- 671314

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

110

6400036606

10.12.2015

KRISHNAS FASHION

JEWELLERY

DOOR NO 9/11, CHRTHALA

P.O,

ALAPPUZHA

KERALA- 688524

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

111

6400036707

10.12.2015

PAVITHRAM JEWELLERS

V/189, PEYAD P.O

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

KERALA- 695573

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

112

6400036808

10.12.2015

VGABM GOLD LIMITED

LIABILITY PARTNER T

SHIP

VII/598F,OPP. BUS

STAND,VENGARA

MALAPPURAM

KERALA- 676304

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940

4315

113

6400036909

10.12.2015

SUMANGALI JEWELLERS

DOOR NO.XV/693/1

THAIKKAD JUN.

GURUVAYOOR

THRISSUR

KERALA- 680104

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

114

6400037204

21.12.2015

SURABHI JEWELLERY

HOSPITAL ROAD,

KODUNGALLUR

THRISSUR

KODUNGALLUR

KERALA- 680664

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

115

6400037305

21.12.2015

AADHAR GOLD PERAMBRA

LLP

DOOR NO.12/1309-

1315,VADAKKANDI

BUILDING, CALICUT ROAD

PERAMBRA

KOZHIKODE

KERALA- 673525

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

116

6400037406

22.12.2015

PARAMEL PAVIZHAM

JEWELLERY

OCHANTHURUTH P.O, VYPIN

ERNAKULAM

KERALA- 682508

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

117

6400037507

22.12.2015

DIVINE GOLD

CALICUT ENCLAVE,IST

FLOOR, 5/3129,B5,B6, UKS

ROAD

KOZHIKODE

KERALA- 673001

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

118

6400038004

13.01.2016

KAVITHA GOLD AND

DIAMONDS

DOOR NO XVI/283 TO 294,

CALICUT

ROAD,VALANCHERY

MALAPPURAM

KERALA-676552

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

119

6400038105

13.01.2016

ANUMOD FASHION

JEWELLERY

DOOR NO.(OLD) X/143-

B,(NEW) VIII/591,

PATTIMATTOM

ERNAKULAM

KERALA-683562

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

120

6400038206

13.01.2016

MINA JEWELLERY

DOOR NO.6/416.OLD,

MYSOOR ROAD,

MANTHAVADY P.O

WAYANAD

KERALA-670645

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

121

6400038307

13.01.2016

THANGALS JEWELLERY

DOOR NO. VIII/580,

THARUVANA P.O

,THARUVANA

WAYANAD

KERALA-670731

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

4316

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

122

6400038408

13.01.2016

MALABAR FASHION

JEWELLERY

DOOR NO.VIII/395B,

PADINJARATHARA P.O,

MANATHAVADY (VIA)

WAYANAD

MANANTHAVADY

KERALA-673575

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

123

6400038509

13.01.2016

AL FAZAL GOLD SOUK

DOOR NO.X/1256E,NEAR

VYAPARA BHAVAN,

BADIYADKA ROAD.

KUMBALA P.O

KASARAGOD

KERALA-671321

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

124

6400038610

13.01.2016

NGD JEWELS

ROOM NO.-III/872 B,C,

THRISSUR ROAD,

VALANCHERY

MALAPPURAM

KERALA-676552

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

125

6400038711

13.01.2016

ZIYA GOLD

AKKARAMMAL COMPLEX,

593-O,593-N,

KURUMATHOOR,KP IV,

THALIPARAMBA

KANNUR

KERALA-670142

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

126

6400038812

13.01.2016

PUSHPALATHA JEWELLERY

VII/271,MARKET ROAD VII,

UDMA P.0,

KASARAGOD

KERALA-671319

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

127

6400038905

13.01.2016

DHANYA JEWELLERY

DOOR NO.XIV/16

,PUTHENPALLI AZHIKODE,

KODUNGALLUR

THRISSUR

KERALA-680666

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

128

6400039006

13.01.2016

VEKKALIAMMAN

JEWELLERS

AP/X/5, KOLLAM,

CHENKOTTA ROAD,

KAZHUTHURUTY P.O

KOLLAM

KERALA-691309

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

129

6400039107

13.01.2016

MOTHIRAVALLI JEWELLERY

NEAR GOVERNMENT

HOSPITAL ROAD, PERAVOOR

P.O

KANNUR

KERALA-670673

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

130

6400039208

13.01.2016

KOLATTUKUDY JEWELLERY

DOOR NO.391/11, MANJAPRA

P.O

ERNAKULAM

KERALA-683581

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940

4317

131

6400039309

13.01.2016

RAJAKUMARI GOLD SOUK

&SUPER MARKET

BUILDING NO.NP.14/723

MAIN ROAD

KALLAMBALAM P.O

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

KERALA- 695605

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

132

6400039511

14.01.2016

MUSCAT JEWELLERY

DOOR NO.17/306,

KUTHUPARAMBA

KANNUR

KERALA- 670643

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

133

6400039612

22.01.2016

NEW CHILANKA JEWELLERY

VII/758, RAILWAY STATION

ROAD, ALUVA

ERNAKULAM

KERALA- 683101

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

134

6400039705

22.01.2016

CRYSTAL JEWELLERS

T.C.38/1222(14),

VALAYAL CHETTY STREET,

CHALAI P.O

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

KERALA- 695036

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

135

6400039806

22.01.2016

THACHAPPALLY

JEWELLERY

PALLURUTHY, KOCHI

ERNAKULAM

KERALA- 682006

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

136

6400039907

22.01.2016

SHAADI GOLD AND

DIAMONDS

10/545,NADUVANNUR P.O

KOZHIKODE

KERALA- 673614

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

137

6400040088

22.01.2016

PALAZHI JEWELLERS

VAISHNAVAM BUILDING

45(NEW330) EZHIKAKATHU

JN.HARIPAD,HARIPAD

II(NEW IX)

ALAPPUZHA

KERALA-690514

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

138

6400040189

22.10.2016

OFFLAND GOLD AND

DIAMONDS

DOOR

NO.9/314A,314B,OFFLAND

ARCADE, ATHANI,ATHOLI

KOZHIKODE

KERALA- 673315

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

139

6400040290

22.10.2016

LAKSHMI JEWELLERY

BUILDING NO-

XIII/544A,KODUNGALLUR,

THRISSUR

KERALA-680664

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

140

6400040391

22.01.2016

SANGEETHA FASHION

JEWELLERY

DOOR NO.TP/11/77(OLD),

IV/95(NEW),

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

4318

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ANCHALUMOOD, PERINAD

P.O

KOLLAM

KERALA-691601

141

6400040492

22.01.2016

SANGEETHA JEWELLERY

ANCHALUMOOD, PERINAD

P.O

KOLLAM

KERALA-691601

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

142

6400040593

22.01.2016

BROTHERS JEWELLERY

WARD NO.1/375, MANGALAM

P.O, THRIKKUNNAPUZHA

ALAPPUZHA

KERALA-690515

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

143

6400040694

22.01.2016

FIRDOUS GOLD PATTAMBI

LLP

DOOR NO.XII/316-385 DUBAI

GOLD AND DIAMONDS,

PERINTHALMANNA ROAD,

PATTAMBI

PALAKKAD

KERALA-679303

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

144

6400040795

22.01.2016

FIRDOUS GOLD

VALANCHERY LLP

VP11/1003 G.H, IST AND IIND

FLOOR, QATAR PLAZA,

VALANCHERY

MALAPPURAM

KERALA-676552

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

145

6400040896

22.01.2016

FIRDOUS GOLD

RAMANATTUKARA LLP

KALLAKKAN BUILDING, 700-

A& 700-B,NEAR BUS STAND,

CALICUT ROAD,

RAMANATTUKARA

KOZHIKODE

KERALA-673633

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

146

6400041292

02.02.2016

THARAKANS SUISSE

JEWELLERY

CHAVAKKAD

THRISSUR

KERALA-680506

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

147

6400041393

02.02.2016

ANUGRAHA JEWELLERY

KOOTTAPADI ROAD,

PARA,P.O PERUMPADAPPA

MALAPPURAM

KERALA-679580

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

148

6400041494

02.02.2016

KANAKAM JEWELLERY

BUS STAD JUNCTION,

CHAVAKKAD

THRISSUR

KERALA- 680506

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

149

6400041595

02.02.2016

T.T JEWELLERY

ENAMAVU ROAD,

CHAVAKKAD

THRISSUR

KERALA- 680506

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940

4319

150

6400041696

02.02.2016

VARNAM JEWELLERY

PUTHANPALLY,PERUMPADA

PPA

MALAPPURAM

KERALA-679580

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

151

6400041797

02.02.2016

THARAKAN JEWELLERY

DOOR NO VII/150G,

CHAVAKKAD

THRISSUR

KERALA-680506

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

152

6400041898

02.02.2016

A.P.BALAKRISHNAPILLAI

13/250, PALAYAM ROAD

KOZHIKODE

KERALA-673001

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

153

6400041999

02.02.2016

SREELAKSHMI GOLD

&DIAMONDS

RAILWAY STATION ROAD

MAHE

PONDICHERY- 673310

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

154

6400042092

02.02.2016

SREEVALSAM GOLD AND

DIAMONDS PVT LTD

RAJAVALSAM BUILDING

571/A , NEAR BUS STAND

KONNI, PATHANAMTHITTA

MAIN ROAD

PATHANAMTHITTA

KERALA-689513

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

155

6400042193

02.02.2016

FIRDOUS GOLD CHEMMAD

PRIVATE LIMITED

(DUBAI GOLD AND

DIAMONDS), TP.V/851,859,

MAIN ROAD CHEMMAD,

TIRURANGADI P.O

MALAPPURAM

KERALA-676306

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

156

6400042799

09.02.2016

FIRDOUS JEWELS AND

DIAMONDS PRIVATE

LIMITED

21/621,D,E,F,G, CENTRAL

TOWER, DOWNHILL

MALAPPURAM

KERALA-676519

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

157

6400042803

09.02.2016

SWARNANJALI GOLD PARCO

DOOR NO.XIII/88-4,5 AND6,

KALPETTA MUNCIPALITY

WAYANAD

KERALA-673121

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

158

6400042904

09.02.2016

SWAYAMVARA JEWELLERS

X/532F, MALIKAMPEEDIKA,

ALANGAD P.O, ALUVA

ERNAKULAM

KERALA- 683511

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

159

6400043094

09.02.2016

SKY GOLD

ROOM NO. PMC VI/285,

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

IS 1417 :

2016

4320

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

OPP.NATIONAL COLEGE,

PERUMBA, PAYYANNUR P.O

KANNUR

KERALA- 670307

fineness and marking -

160

6400043195

09.02.2016

SKY GOLD

ROOM NO. KCP XIII,

1604A,KEEZHUR

CHAVASSERY

PANCHAYATH, MAIN ROAD

IRITTY

KANNUR

KERALA- 670703

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

161

6400043296

09.02.2016

SWAPNA FASHION

JEWELLERY

NEERUNGAL (BUILDING),

S.KALAMASSERY

ERNAKULAM

KERALA- 602033

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

162

6400043397

09.02.2016

KOICKAL JEWELLERS

32/73, PARK JUNCTION,

KAYAMKULAM

ALAPPUZHA

KERALA-690502

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

163

6400043498

09.02.2016

DAZE DIAMONDS LTD

PATHAYAPURA BUILDING,

ROUND SOUTH

THRISSUR

KERALA- 680001

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

164

6400043599

09.02.2016

KOICKAL JEWELLERS

HP 8/509, MAIN ROAD

HARIPPAD

ALAPPUZHA

KERALA- 690514

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

165

6400043906

08.02.2016

KUMBUKAL FASHION

JEWELLERY

VAZHOOR P.O

KOTTAYAM

KERALA- 686504

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

166

6400044096

18.02.2016

NIVEDHYAM JEWELLERS

711/399/400,

MALAYANKEEZH P.O

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

KERALA- 695571

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

167

640004419

18.02.2016

ARABIAN JEWELLERS

N H ROAD,

KARUNAGAPPALLY

KOLLAM

KERALA- 691001

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

168

6400044298

18.02.2016

METRO GOLD & DIAMONDS

4/93(4/1533), PULLUPALAM

ROAD, FORTKOCHI P.O,

KUNNUMPURAM, KOCHI

ERNAKULAM

KERALA- 682001

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940

4321

169

6400044399

18.02.2016

ARABIAN JEWELLERS

KUMPAZHA ROAD

PATHANAMTHITTA

KERALA- 689645

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

170

6400044403

18.02.2016

VIJAYAKRISHNA GOLD

CHADAYAMANGALAM,

KOTTARAKKARA

KOLLAM

KERALA- 691534

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

171

6400044807

25.02.2016

CHEMMANUR GOLD PALACE

INTERNATIONAL LTD.

BOBY CHEMMANUR

MARGIN FREE MINI

JEWELLERS

VETTOOR ARCADE,

NEAR KSRTC BUS STAND,

MAIN CENTRAL ROAD,

ETTUMANOOR

KOTTAYAM

KERALA- 686631

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

172

6400045098

03.03.2016

HIGHNESS JEWELLERY

XX/1080-1081, RESHMA

BUILDING, THAZHEPALAM,

TIRUR

MALAPPURAM

KERALA-676101

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

173

6400045199

03.03.2016

RAJADHANI JEWELLERS

DOOR NO.T.M 20/1140-41,

THAZHEPALAM, TIRUR

MALAPPURAM

KERALA-676101

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

174

6400045203

03.03.2016

MUGHAL JEWELLERS

PARAPPANAGADI ROAD,

TANUR

MALAPPURAM

KERALA- 676302

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

175

6400045304

03.03.2016

ALMADEENA JEWELLERY

11/530 G, ALATHIYOUR P.O,

TIRUR.2.

MALAPPURAM

KERALA-676102

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

176

6400045406

03.03.2016

AJANTHA JEWELLERS

B NO.VI/434, PARIYAPURAM,

POST PACHATHIRI, TIRUR.5.

MALAPPURAM

KERALA-676105

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

177

6400045506

03.03.2016

SUDHA GOLD

DOOR NO.10/293, CITY PARK

CENTRE, EZHUR ROAD,

TIRUR

MALAPPURAM

KERALA-676101

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

178

6400045607

03.03.2016

AMRUTHA GOLD &

DIAMOND

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

IS 1417 :

2016

4322

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

AMRUTHA BUILDING, 14/158,

CHETTPPADI, 14.

MALAPPURAM

KERALA-676319

fineness and marking -

179

6400046609

03.03.2016

TAJMAHAL GOLD

SUPERMARKET PVT LTD

DOOR NO.MP IV/380 NEAR

POST OFFICE, MELATTUR

MALAPPURAM

KERALA-679326

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

180

6400045809

04.03.2016

ARAB GOLD AND DIAMONDS

PVT LTD

SPXIX/1365,1366,1367, ADOOR

ROAD, BHARANIKAVU,

SASTHAMKOTTA P.O

KOLLAM

KERALA-690521

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

181

6400045910

04.03.2016

KALA JEWELLERY

ALTHARA,

PUNNAYOORKULAM

THRISSUR

KERALA-679561

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

182

6400046003

04.03.2016

KOYILAT GOLD AND

DIAMONDS

T.P 11/413&414 OPP. VILLAGE

OFFICE

KACHERI,PARAMBATH

THALAKULATHOOR

KOZHIKODE

KERALA-673317

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

183

6400046104

04.03.2016

ALEENA JEWELLERY

KURISUPALLY JUNCTION

VADUTHALA,CHITTOOR

ROAD,KOCHI

ERNAKULAM

KERALA-682023

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

184

6400046205

04.03.2016

FAIZAL JEWELLERS

EZHUR ROAD,TIRUR

MALAPPURAM

KERALA-676101

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

185

6400046306

04.03.2016

SWARNA JEWELLERY

3/953-2 NEAR STATE BANK

OF INDIA,CIVIL LANE ROAD,

VAZHAKKALA,

THRIKKAKARA P.O

ERNAKULAM

KERALA-682021

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

186

6400046407

04.03.2016

SREE KRISHNA GOLD &

DIAMONDS

ROOM NO. 6 TDB BUILDING,

AC ROAD, CHERTHALA

ALAPPUZHA

KERALA-688524

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

187

6400046508

04.03.2016

MANIGRAMAM JEWELLERY

OYOOR

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

IS 1417 :

2016

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940

4323

KOLLAM

KERALA-691510

fineness and marking -

188

6400046710

10.03.2016

FATHIMA GOLD & DIAMOND

BUILDING NO.7/101B,

KOLATHUR, KURUPPATHAL,

MOORKANAD PANCHAYATH

MALAPPURAM

KERALA-679338

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

189

6400046811

10.03.2016

NAVEEN JEWELLERY

BUILDING NO. XIII/273,

PAMPAKUDA P.O

ERNAKULAM

KERALA-686667

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

190

6400046912

15.03.2016

SWAPNA JEWELLERY

VECHOOR P.O, EDAYAZHAM

KOTTAYAM

KERALA-686144

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

191

6400047005

15.03.2016

M S GOLD $ DIAMONDS

THAVAKKAL COMPLEX-

IRITTY,KCP XIII/1613 A27-32

A48-51463,A64 IRITTY

XIII,IRITTY

KANNUR

KERALA-670703

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

192

6400047106

15.03.2016

SOUMYA JEWELLERY

P.P 12/582, OPP.SANKAR

CLINIC, PERAMBRA P.O

KOZHIKODE

KERALA-673525

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

193

6400047207

15.03.2016

KRISHNA GOLD SOUK

KUTTIPURAM ROAD,

VALANCHERY

MALAPPURAM

KERALA-676552

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

194

6400047308

15.03.2016

ARCHANA JEWELLERY

MAIN ROAD

KOLLAM

KERALA-691001

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

195

6400047409

15.03.2016

BEEMA JEWELLERY

AYOOR, AYOOR P.O

KOLLAM

KERALA-691533

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

196

6400047510

15.03.2016

NTM JEWELLERY

20/123,PANDIKKAD ROAD,

MANJERI

MALAPPURAM

KERALA/-676121

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

197

6400047611

15.03.2016

THEKKINEDATH JEWELLERY

EZHAVASAMAJAM

BUILDING,

CHENDAMANGALAM

JUNCTION, N. PARAVOUR

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

4324

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

[No. CMD/13:13]

K. KADIRVEL, Scientist ‘F’ & Head

ERNAKULAM

KERALA-683513

198

6400047712

15.03.2016

CHUNGATH

GOLD&DIAMONDS

CHUNGATH BUILDING MAIN

ROAD , IRINJALAKUDA

THRISSUR

KERALA-680125

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

199

6400048007

18.03.2016

DEEPTHI JEWELLERY

XII/409, CENTRAL JUCTION,

RAJAKUMARY P.O,

RAJAKUMARY

IDUKKI

KERALA-685619

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

200

6400048108

18.03.2016

MAHAR GOLD CENTRE

HIGH SCHOOL

ROAD,THRIPRANGODE

P.O,ALATHIYOOR

MALAPPURAM

KERALA-676102

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

201

6400048310

22.03.2016

AL FARDAN JEWELLERS

MAIN ROAD, KODUVALLY

KOZHIKODE

KERALA-673572

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

202

6400048411

28.03.2016

ATLAS GOLD

INTERNATIONAL

PAYYANUR

MALL,GOVT.HOSPITAL

ROAD,PAYYANUR

KANNUR

KERALA-670307

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

203

6400048512

28.03.2016

A.GEERI PAI

TC NO.40/3046,3047

BROADWAY

ERNAKULAM

KERALA-682031

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

204

6400048605

28.03.2016

CHUNGATH GOLD

CHUNGATH JEWELLERY,

ALUVA ROAD, ANGAMALY

ERNAKULAM

KERALA-683572

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

205

6400048706

28.03.2016

DISIGNER JEWELLERS

PARAPPANGADI ROAD, P.O

TANUR

MALAPPURAM

KERALA-676302

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts –

fineness and marking -

IS 1417 :

2016

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940

4325

Je vkSj jkstxkj ea=kky;

ubZ fnYyh] 14 twu] 2018

dk-vk- 972.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj Hkkjrh;

LVsV cSad ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky; ua- 1] fnYyh ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 262@2017) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 14-06-

2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&12012@78@2016&vkbZvkj (ch&I)º

jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

New Delhi, the 14th June, 2018

S.O. 972.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 262/2017) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court No. 1, Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank

of India and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 14.06.2018.

[No. L-12012/78/2016-IR (B-I)]

RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE PRESIDING OFFICER: CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR

COURT No.1: ROOM No.511, DWARKA COURT COMPLEX, SECTOR 10, DWARKA, DELHI

ID No. 262/2017

Shri Devi Lal Prasad S/o Shri Duryodhan Prasad,

Represented by

Indian Steel and Metal Workers Union(Regd.)

46 – Nehru Market (Patera),

Badarpur,

New Delhi -110044

…Workman

Versus

(i)

The Chief Manager,

State Bank of India,

Opp. Tughlakabad Metro Station,

Badarpur,

New Delhi 110044

(ii)

M/s. Federal Security Service Pvt.

522, 5th Floor, Inder Prakash Building,

21, Barakhamba Road, Connaught Place,

New Delhi 110001

…Management

AWARD

Central Government, vide letter No.L-12012/78/2016-IR(B-I) dated 22.09.2017, under clause (d) of sub-section

(1) and sub-section (2-A) of Section 10 referred an industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication with the

following terms:

“Whether the action of the management of State Bank of India, opposite Tughlakabad Metro Station,

Badarpur, New Delhi and M/s Federal Security Service Pvt. Ltd. in terminating the services of the

workman Shri Devi Lal Meena with effect from 19.08.2014 is fair and legal? If not, to what relief the

workman are entitled to and from which date?”

4326

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2.

In the reference order, the appropriate Government commanded the party raising the dispute to file statement of

claim, complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses with this Tribunal within 15 days of receipt of

the reference order and to forward a copy of such statement of claim to the opposite party/ies involved in the dispute.

Despite directions so given, Shri Devi Lal Meena opted not to file his claim statement with the Tribunal.

3.

On receipt of the above reference, notice was sent to the claimant as well as the management. Neither the postal

article, referred above, was received back nor was it observed by the Tribunal that postal services remained affected

during the period, referred above. Therefore, every presumption lies in favour of the fact that the above notice was

served upon the claimant. Despite service of the notice, claimant opted to abstain from the proceedings and no claim

statement was filed on his behalf. Thus, it is clear that the claimant is not interested in adjudication of the reference on

merits.

4.

Since the claimant has neither put in his appearance nor has he led any evidence so as to prove his cause against

the management, as such, this Tribunal is left with no choice, except to pass a ‘No Dispute/Claim’ award. However, it

is made clear that there is no adjudication of the case on merits, as such, claimant is still at liberty to agitate his cause in

accordance with law. An award is accordingly passed. Let this award be sent to the appropriate Government, as

required under Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, for publication.

A. C. DOGRA, Presiding Officer

Dated : May 17, 2018

ubZ fnYyh] 14 twu] 2018

dk-vk- 973.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj ÚaVykbu

(,ulhvkj) fctusl lkWY;w'kal fyfeVsM ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd

fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] Hkqous'oj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 67@2016) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS]

tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 14-06-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&12025@01@2018&vkbZvkj (ch&I)º

jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 14th June, 2018

S.O. 973.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 67/2016) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Bhubaneswar as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of The

Frontline (NCR) Business Solutions Pvt. Ltd. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 14.06.2018.

[No. L-12025/01/2018-IR (B-I)]

RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT BHUBANESWAR

Present:

Shri B.C. Rath,

Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-cum-Labour

Court, Bhubaneswar.

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 67/2016

Date of Passing Award – 1st May, 2018

Between :

The Frontline (NCR) Business Solutions

Pvt. Ltd., N4/186, IRC Village, Nayapalli,

Near Usthi Hospital,

Bhubaneswar – 751 215

…1st Party-Management

(And)

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940

4327

Shri Kartika Chandra Pradhan,

S/o. Dhruba Charan Pradhan,

At. Ramvilla, PO. Borikina,

Ps. Balikuda, Dist. Jagatsinghpur – 754 110

…2nd Party-Applicant

Appearances:

None

…

For the 1st Party-Management

Shri K.C. Pradhan

…

For Himself the 2nd Party-Applicant

AWARD

This is an application under sub-section 2 & 3 of section 2-A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (in short

“The Act”) preferred by the applicant, Shri Kartika Chandra Pradhan, son of Dhruba Charan Pradhan P.S. Balikuda,

Jagatsinghpur for a direction to the Opp. Party-Management of M/s. Frontline (NCR) Business solutions Pvt. Ltd. to

reinstate him with all back wages and other service benefits.

2.

The case of the applicant, as revealed from his statement of claim, is that he was appointed as a Facility

Attendant on 23.11.2013 and directed to perform his duty as a Security Guard at HDFC Bank, Vivekananda Marg,

Bhubaneswar. After joining he performed all his duties with utmost sincerity and honesty to the best satisfaction of his

employers. In the month of August, 2015 he was directed to work at HDFC Bank at Keonjhar. He availed leave from

01.11.2015 to 07.11.2015 for illness of his mother. On 08.11.2015 when he reported to his duty, the Operational

Manger did not allow him to resume his duty and verbally informed him that his service was already terminated. As he

was not served with any notice pay and retrenchment compensation prior to such refusal of employment, he raised a

dispute before the A.L.C.(C) in view of he worked for more than 240 days continuously in a twelve months calendar

year preceding to his refusal of employment. According to him his juniors are still continuing in service. As

conciliation proceeding failed and a certificate in this regard was issued to him by the A.L.C.(C) without taking any

initiation for referring the dispute to the Tribunal, he is compelled to prefer the application resorting to the provisions of

sub-section 2 and 3 of Section 2-A of the Act.

3.

As the Opp. Party-Management did not appear and contest the claim inspite of sufficiency of notice, he has

been set exparte. The applicant-workman has examined himself as A.W.-1 and filed copy of the deployment order

dated 23.11.2013, copy of the representation of the workman to the Central Labour Commissioner, copy of the letter of

the A.L.C.(C), Bhubaneswar dated 24.2.2016, copy of the certificate issued by the A.L.C.(C) on dated 27.6.2016 and

copy of the I-Card issued to the workman in support of his pleadings advanced in his statement of claim.

4.

As per his unchallenged and uncontroverted statement filed in form of sworn affidavit he was appointed on

23.11.2013 by the Opp. Party-Management to perform the duty of security guard at HDFC Bank, Vivekananda Marg,

Bhubaneswar. According to him he continued to work as such in different branches of the HDFC Bank including the

branch at Keonjhar after his appointment. He availed leave on 01.11.2015 to 07.11.2015 for illness of his mother. On

08.11.2015 when he reported to his duty he was refused employment. According to him he was engaged continuously

and uninterruptedly for more than 240 days in twelve calendar months preceding to his alleged refusal of employment.

He has asserted that he was not provided with notice pay or retrenchment compensation prior to his alleged

disengagement. Such disengagement being in violation of Section 25-F of the Act, he is entitled to reinstatement with

back wages. He has also stated that persons engaged subsequent to him are continuing in service. There is no reason to

disbelieve his unchallenged and uncontroverted sworn statement. On the other hand, the documents filed by him more

particularly the deployment order, Ext.-1 allegedly issued by the Opp. Party-Management supports his version. That

apart, perusal of other documents like copy of the complaint letter issued to the labour machinery and notice issued by

the labour machinery to the Opp. Party-Management, the certificate issued by the labour machinery and the copy of the

I.D. card allegedly issued by the Opp. Party-Management are lending credential to his statement. In the above premises,

there is no other alternative than to reaching a conclusion that the applicant workman was employed by the Opp. Party-

Management with effect from 23.11.2013 to work as a Security Guard in the branches of the HDFC Bank and he was

in continuous service till he was refused employment with effect from 08.11.2015 without being paid notice pay and

retrenchment compensation. Thus, his disengagement amounts to retrenchment in violation of provisions of Section

25-F of the Act. He is stated to be not in gainful employment after his retrenchment. That being the fact the Opp. Party-

Management is required to reinstate him with all back wages and other service benefits.

Hence, it is ordered that, the applicant workman be reinstated with immediate effect along with all his back

wages and service benefits within two months of the publication of the award failing which, the applicant is entitled to

receive interest at a rate of 8% on the wages and benefits to which the applicant is entitled to receive. Copy of this

award be sent for publication in the official gazette as per the rules.

Dictated & Corrected by me.

B. C. RATH, Presiding officer

4328

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ubZ fnYyh] 14 twu] 2018

dk-vk- 974.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj mÙkj jsyos

ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k

,oa Je U;k;ky;] y[kuÅ ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 54@2013) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 14-06-2018 dks çkIr gqvk

FkkA

¹la- ,y&41012@16@2013&vkbZvkj (ch&I)º

jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 14th June, 2018

S.O. 974.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 54/2013) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Lucknow as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Northern

Railway and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 14.06.2018.

[No. L-41012/16/2013-IR (B-I)]

RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW

PRESENT : RAKESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer

I.D. No. 54/2013

Ref.No. L-41012/16/2013-IR(B-I) dated 15.07.2013

BETWEEN :

Sri Ram Awadh S/o Shri Merai

R/o Raipur Semraha, P.O. Naipur,

Gonda(UP)

AND

1.

The Divisional Railway Manager,

Northern Railway,

DRM, Hazratganj,

Lucknow (UP)

AWARD

1

By order No. L-41012/16/2013-IR(B-I) dated 15.07.2013 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour,

New Delhi in exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of sub section (1) and sub section (2A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) referred this industrial dispute between Sri Ram Awadh S/o Shri Merai,

Gonda and the DRM, NR, Lucknow for adjudication.

2.

The reference under adjudication is:

“WHETHER THE ACTION OF THE MANAGEMENT OF NORTHERN RAILWAY, LUCKNOW IN

IMPOSING THE PUNISHMENT OF REMOVAL FROM SERVICES UPON SRI RAM AWADH S/O

SRI MERAI W.E.F. 27.08.2010 AND HIS APPEAL DISMISSAL ORDER DATED 24.02.2011, IS

LEGAL AND JUSTIFIED? TO WHAT RELIEF THE CONCERNED WORKMAN IS ENTITLED?”

3.

The workman in his claim statement W-6 has stated in brief that he was appointed as Porter on 5.12.1980,

under the administrative control of the opposite parties, on 26.4.1999 he was transferred from Ayodhya to Sarai

Harakhoo on 26.4.99 LPC was provided to him by Station Supdt., NR Ayodhya but did not give him the Spare Memo;

and Duty Pass was also not given to him, yet the applicant reached Sarai Harakhoo to report for duty on his own

expenses but he was not permitted by the Station Supdt., because he did not have Spare Memo. It has further been

stated in the claim statement that the petitioner was compelled to run several times between Sarai Harakho and

Ayodhya, but neither he was permitted to join duty at Sarai Harkhoo nor Spare Memo was provided to him. Therefore

he was compelled to file OA no. 629/2005 before the CAT, Lucknow, vide order dated 7.09.2006 the CAT directed the

opposite party to consider his request and to resolve his grievances.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940

4329

4.

The petitioner has further emphasized that opposite party no.2 DOM, NR was annoyed with him for filling the

case before the CAT and did not permit him to resume his duty, issued him a major penalty charge sheet dated

04.05.2007 with the allegations that the workman has been abstaining himself from duty since 26.4.99, the aforesaid

order in itself is not correct since the petitioner was intentionally harassed by Statio Supdt. Ayodhya and Sarai

Harakhoo. It has further been stated that D&AR enquiry was delayed and he was kept out of job on the pretext of the

pendency of enquiry, although representation dt. 24.12.2007, 20.1.2008 and 3.3.2008 were sent by him. Due to

continuous alleged harassment the matter was raised before RLC( C ) Lucknow in Jan.2009 by the workman, after

prolonged discussion under conciliation proceeding a settlement was made and the opposite party thereby agreed to

provide Spare Memo so as to facilitate the joining of the workman.

5.

The workman has stressed that he was asked to submit an affidavit regarding his sickness from 16.04.99 to

23.03.2008 before permitting him to join his duty. Under the compelled circumstances being faced since 1999 the

petitioner submitted an affidavit drafted by the opposite party, thereafter he was permitted to join on 05.06.2008 on the

post of Porter at Sarai Harkhoo Station but the enquiry proceedings were not dropped. The workman has alleged that

the enquiry was not conducted as per rules, no prosecution witness appeared before the enquiry officer, the workman

was not given any opportunity to cross examine the material-witness, moreover he was not permitted to submit his

defence. The enquiry report has allegedly been quite perverse, it lacked fairness and the consequent order of removal

from service was patently illegal since it was passed after 2 years and 5 months from the date of receipt of the report of

the enquiry officer. The aforesaid affidavit dt. 12.03.2008 drafted by the opposite party staff has been dealt with, it was

infact fictitious and manipulated. Appeal filed by the workman was withdrawn on the advice of the office staff and the

same was rejected with a non speaking order dt. 24.02.2011. It has further been stated in the claim statement that the

Disciplinary Authority and the Appellatte Authority did not consider the material fact properly, 30 years service

rendered by the workman was also ignored, and very harsh punishment of removal from service was passed which is

disproportionate, unjust and illegal.

6.

With the aforesaid pleadings request has been made by the workman to declare the termination order dt.

27.08.2010 as illegal, and prayer has been made for reinstatement with full back wages etc.

7.

Several documents have been annexed with the claim statement.

8.

With strong denial of the allegations leveled in the claim statement, management has filed written statement M-7.

It has been admitted that the workman was transferred on 26.04.99 from Ayodhya to Sarai Harkhoo but he failed to join

duty and was treated as absent from 26.04.99 to 02.03.2008, therefore major punishment penalty charge sheet was

issued under rules and an enquiry was conducted comprehensively. The opposite party has stated that because of being

found guilty for unauthorized absence, enquiry report was submitted and penalty of removal from service was imposed.

The management has admitted the proceedings before RLC ( C ) Lucknow. The enquiry was quite fair, proper and

ample opportunity was provided to workman to defend himself and he has participated in the enquiry proceedings.

9.

The opposite party has further stated that the workman himself on his own, has submitted affidavit before the

Railway Authorities mentioning therein that he was sick from 16.04.99 to 20.03.2008 but before the Tribunal he

wrongly alleged that the affidavit was taken by manipulation by the Railway Officers. Since the petitioner has

abstained himself from the duty for about 8 years without any information of leave for his sickness etc, the order of

removal from service is fully justified and proper.

10.

Thereafter, rejoinder W-8 has been filed by the workman, reiterating the pleas taken in the claim statement,

allegations made in the written statement have been denied. As per application M-12 certain documents have been filed

by the management.

11.

On 14.10.2015 following preliminary issues were framed;

1.

Whether the departmental enquiry is fair and proper?

2.

Whether the findings of the enquiry officer are perverse?

12.

The workman has filed affidavit W-13 in evidence. He has been cross examined on behalf of the management.

Opposite party filed an affidavit M-15 of an employee of the DRM office. MW has been cross examined on behalf of

the workman. Vide order dt. 12.8.16 it has been held by this Tribunal that the departmental enquiry was not conducted

in fair and proper manner. Consequential findings of the enquiry officer were treated as perverse. Both the preliminary

issues were decided against the opposite party. However although several opportunities were provided to the

management to adduce his evidence. It could not submit any evidence further the management furnished a copy of

letter dt. 18.10.2016 informing thereby that the then Station Supdt. Ayodhya and Sarai Harkhoo who have retired much

earlier, have died.

4330

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

13.

Arguments of both the parties have been heard at length. Record has been scanned thoroughly.

14.

Learned AR for the workman has submitted that illegal and harsh order of removal from service was passed by

the management and this fact was ignored that the petitioner could not attend the duty because of his ailment, his

superior authority/Station Supdt. intentionally harassed him and did not permit him to join duty. On the contrary the

management has emphasized that the workman has been quite habitual to abstain himself from duty without any

genuine reason more over no prior permission was taken by the workman. The management has further submitted that

the enquiry was conducted quite comprehensively and as per Rules, sufficient opportunity was provided to the

workman to defend himself.

15.

In this regard the so called memo of settlement dt. 29.02.2008, admitted to both the parties, is also quite

relevant. The management although accepted this document, asserts that the varacity and legality can not be inferred

since it has not been signed by the competent authority. Learned AR for the workman while taking strong objection to

this submission asserts that the authority of RLC ( C ) is being challenged by the management before this Tribunal.

16.

It is evident from the record that the then Station Supdt. Ayodhya and Sarai Harkhoo, Sri Tilak Dhari and

Sri Govind Nigam were not produced in the enquiry on the ground that they had retired. This ground of non producing

witness does not appear satisfactory. The address of retired railway officials, who have been taking regular pensionary

benefits etc, could be easily obtained. More over no sincere effort was made by the management to adduce those retired

officer before this Tribunal as well, although the learned AR for the management sought several adjournments on this

ground, but his efforts were futile, since superior railway officers did not make any sincere endeavour in this regard.

17.

Last para of the enquiry report dated 20.3.08 is very crucial wherein it has been mentioned by the enquiry

officer that the charges can not be proved with cogent evidence, since the then Station Supdts., have retired earlier.

18.

The findings recorded by this Tribunal/Court vide order dt. 12.8.16, have not been challenged before any other

Hon’ble Competent Court. Despite being provided sufficient opportunity, no further evidence in support of the charges

framed against the workman could be adduced by the management. This fact is not to be over looked that during the so

called long absence of the petitioner, whether any memo/charge sheet was sent by the management or any such receipt

therefore was obtained. The delay of about 28 months after the final findings of the enquiry officer having been

received, has also not been genuinenly explained by the management. No doubt an affidavit dt. 12.3.08 is on record

wherein fact of w.e.f. 16.4.99 to 2.3.08 has been mentioned. But on account of this affidavit the inference drawn by the

enquiry officer and competent disciplinary authority can not be appreciated legally.

19.

After having heard the intellect arguments of both the Learned Authorized Representatives, in the light of the

record available before this court, it is inferred that the order of removal from service, passed by the management

against the workman and further both the dismissal order dt. 27.08.2010 and the appellate order dated 24.02.2011, can

not be adjudged as legal and justified. The termination order and the appellate order are set aside. The workman is

entitled to reinstatement from the relevant date and he shall get all the pecuniary benefit as well. The management is

directed to ensure the payment of arrears to the workman within 10 weeks from the date of publication of award failing

which the workman shall also get interest @ 6% per annum.

20.

Award as above.

LUCKNOW

11.01.2018

RAKESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 14 twu] 2018

dk-vk- 975.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eè; jsyos

ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k

,oa Je U;k;ky;] dkuiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 132@1992) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 14-06-2018 dks çkIr

gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&41012@106@91&vkbZvkj (ch&I)º

jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 14th June, 2018

S.O. 975.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 132/1992) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940

4331

Labour Court, Kanpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Central Railway

and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 14.06.2018.

[No. L-41012/106/91-IR (B-I)]

RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SRI SHUBHENDRA KUMAR, HJS, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOR COURT, KANPUR

Industrial Dispute No. 132/1992

Between –

President,

Rashtriya Chaturth Shreni Rail Mazdoor Congress,

2/236 Namner,

Agra-282001.

And

Divisional Railway Manager (P),

Central Railway,

Jhansi-284001.

AWARD

1.

Central Government, Mol & Employment, New Delhi, vide notification no. L-41012/106/91/IRDU dated

06.11.92, has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal.

2.

Whether the action of the railway administration of Mathura Junction in not regularizing the services of

Sri Dhamendra Singh, alias Dharmendra Singh son of Sri Dangal Singh, Ex-MRCL and also terminating his

services w.e.f. 01.08.89 is justified? If not, what relief he is entitled to?

3.

The case of the worker in short is that he was in continuous employment under the management of Central

Railway since 19.04.78, and during the period 28.04.87 to 30.07.89, while posted under Station Master, Farah,

Mathura he worked at the post of APM (MRCL), the management discontinued the services of the worker with

effect from 01.08.89, without issuing any charge sheet, without making any payment with regard to

retrenchment compensation, without any notice or notice pay. He was medically fit. It is alleged that his

colleague employees were made permanent in the employment of the railway and when he demanded for his

regularization and bonus, the employers became annoyed and ultimately he was removed by the employers. It is

also alleged that the employer had not taken back the workman in the employment in terms of letter no.

P/161/O/OP/Screening/Recruitment dated 05.09.89 that was issued to T.I. Mathura.

4.

It is also alleged by the worker that the management after his disengagement from the services of the railway

had given regular and permanent appointment to S/Sri Phool Singh son of Nekram, Pooran Singh son of

Laxman Singh, Ativeer Singh son of Sri Sarnam, Singh. Radhey Shyam son of Nathuram, on the basis of award

rendered by this Tribunal in this way the management has violated the provisions of section 25F, 25G and 25H

of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. After disengagement, the worker and his family members are at the stage of

starvation mainly for the reasons that he is jobless and in this context a notice dated 21.11.89 was also sent to

the railway administration but no action was taken on it by the railway administration.

5.

The management has filed written statement in which the entire claim of the worker has been denied for want of

proof. It is denied by the management that at any point of time he was disengaged from the railway service. The

hard fact that remains is that the worker himself has left his job without any information and his claim in the

manner and way as presented before this tribunal cannot be granted by this tribunal. By way of additional pleas

it has been stated that the services of the worker had never been terminated with effect from 01.08.89 and it

seems that the worker had taken employment on the basis of fake card and to cover the said flaw he has avoided

to file any relevant documents and as such the worker is trying to seek such relief from this tribunal which

under no circumstances can be granted in his favor. Since the claimant has not disclosed any particular about his

employment and has himself absconded from the place of work and also not represented before the appropriate

authority for granting status his claim brought before the tribunal is false bogus and fabricated hence is liable to

be rejected.

6.

Worker has filed rejoinder in the case but nothing new has been detailed therein except reiteration of the facts

already pleaded in the claim petition.

4332

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

7.

It is pertinent to mention that in this case an award was passed ex-parte on 21.05.96 against the management.

Thereafter the management has moved an application for recalling the order which was also rejected by my

learned predecessor. Management has thereafter filed CMWP NO.8503/98 DRM versus PO, CGIT and the

Hon’ble Court vide order dated 04.02.08 set aside and quashed the ex-parte award dated 21.05.96 and the

matter was remitted back to this tribunal for deciding it afresh.

8.

On behalf of the worker Dharmendra Singh has been examined as w.w.1 and on behalf of the management

M.W.1 Sri D.P. Meena working in personnel department has been examined.

9.

Worker along with rejoinder has filed letter of Station Superintendent as Annexure-1, Service card of worker

Annexure-2 showing details of engagement, annexure 2-A, medical certificate, Annexure 3, order granting

bonus , annexure 4, Duty Pass annexure-5A and 5-B, Calculation chart of working days of worker, annexure 6,

notice sent to the management, annexure 7, claim statement filed by union against DRM in I.D. Case no. 10 of

87, annexure 8, engagement of hot weather waterman, annexure 9, letter regarding filling of vacancies in group

D annexure 10.

10.

Worker has also filed application for seeking information under RTI paper no. 4/5-7 and its reply paper no. 4/10

trough list 39/2.

11.

Opposite party management has filed copy of live register 34/2-18 through list 34/1 and has also filed letter

regarding inquiry of worker and medical record of worker through list A/10.

12.

I have heard the arguments of the authorized representative for the worker and none appeared for submitting

arguments on behalf of the management. I have also perused the whole record carefully.

13.

The case of the worker is that for the first time he was appointed under the management on 19.04.78 and

continuously worked and during the period 28.04.87 to 30.07.89 he worked under Station Master, Farah,

District Mathura and acquired the status of Monthly Rated Casual Labor (in short MRCL) and his services were

discontinued with effect from 01.08.89, without any charge sheet, without any show cause notice and without

making payment of retrenchment compensation and in this way the railway management has violated the

provisions of 25F, 25G and 25H of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Whereas on the other hand the case of the

management is that they never terminated the services of the worker and the worker has left the job of his own

on 01.08.89 without any information and therefore, he is not entitled for the protection of the provisions of

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

14.

The worker in support of his case has examined himself and in his examination in chief he has deposed the

version made by him in his claim petition by stating that he was appointed on 19.04.78 as casual worker and

attained the status of MRCL on 20.07.87. He has further stated that he continuously worked during the period

28.07.87 to 30.08.89 and his original service card is with the department and whatever documents have been

filed by him, the original of the same are in the custody of the department.

15.

In his cross examination the worker has expressed his ignorance about the fact that any case was filed by him

before Central Administrative Tribunal at New Delhi and it is also not in his notice whether any decision was

given by the court or not. He has further stated that the letter that was sent from the office of DRM(P) in the

month of Marcy, 87 was received by him, carbon copy of which has been filed by him and the same is on record

and after receipt of the said letter he deposited entire original documents in the railway department. He does not

remember that the department vide paper no. 20/9 had informed that his casual labor card is fake and forged.

The witness of his own stated that there is difference between name Dharmend and Dharminder therefore, he

has been asked to sit. The copy of the letter in which the above suggestion was given has not been filed by him.

He further stated that he had never been informed that his service card is fake and bogus thereby he will be

prevented from the service. Witness has further stated that after sending the original card in March 97, he

moved application and he cannot state that its copy has been filed or not. He denied the fact that after

conducting inquiry, railway administration found his service card as bogus and forged and for this reason he

was denied employment by the railway administration.

16.

Management witness Sri D P Meena in his examination in chief has stated that as per record no person by the

name of Dharmend alias Dharmender Singh was found working under the Station Master Farah either during

the period 19.04.78 to 28.4.87 and on 30.07.89. He has further stated that no person by the above name was

retrenched on 01.08.89. The documents that were deposited by the worker on verification were found bogus,

fake and forged.

17.

In his cross examination the witness has clearly stated that whatever deposition is made by him is on the basis

of documents. Witness has admitted in his cross examination that the muster roll of the period during which the

worker is alleged to have worked under the railway has not been filed. Witness has the fact that casual labour

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940

4333

card no. 11888 was issued by Sri M K Gupta working in the railway. There are several matters in which on

inquiry service cards were found bogus and those have been ceased. On a specific question put before the

witness that whether any record has been filed with regard to the service cards found fake witness replied that

the record is on the file. Witness has also denied the fact that any card in the name of worker was ever ceased.

He has also stated that records are preserved for 10 years thereafter they are destroyed. The witness has half

heartedly stated that the services of the worker were not terminated rather worker had left the job of his own

accord in the year 1989. The witness has admitted that a casual labor who had worked continuously for 120

days are given status of MRCL and when any worker is converted from DRCL to MRCL his medical

examination is done. Witness has expressed his ignorance about the fact as to whether worker was ever

medically examined or not.

18.

From the pleadings of the parties, evidence oral and documentary it is clearly established that the worker was

employed by the railway administration as casual labor and subsequently he attained the status of MRCL.

Whereas the case of the worker is that he was illegally retrenched from the service of the railway, the case of

the management is that on 01.08.89, the worker himself has absconded from the service without any

information. Even this fact has also been admitted by the management witness in his cross examination.

19.

It contended by the authorized representative for the worker that when the worker had attained the status of

MRCL and had left the job willingly as pr management contention, it was incumbent upon the management to

have conducted a detailed inquiry and ought to have issued notice to the worker asking therein that he is

absconding from the service without any information and he should report for his duty by such and such time

otherwise he will be subjected to disciplinary action and not taking any action would entail the action of the

management as illegal and in breach of the provisions of rules of natural justice. It is also contended by the

authorized representative for the worker that the railway management has not filed any documents to show that

any inquiry regarding absence of the worker was conducted at any point of time.

20.

The authorized representative for the worker on the above point has placed reliance of a decision given by

Hon’ble Supreme Court reported in 2004 (103) FLR 102 in the case of NICKS (INDIA) TOOLS AND RAM

SURAT AND ANOTHER, wherein the Hon’ble Court has held as under-

21.

”Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and having perused the records we notice that the

factum that the workman was in the service of the management till 22nd of April, 1993 is not disputed.

While the workman contends that his service from that day were wrongly terminated. The appellant

contends that the workman voluntarily left the service of the appellant. Since the respondent workman

was in the service of the appellant management at least up to the 2nd of the April, 1993, the burden of

proving ha he voluntarily left the service then falls on the appellant of proving that he voluntarily left the

services then falls on the appellant management.”

22.

The facts and circumstances of the case in hand are analogous to the facts and circumstances of the case decided

by Hon’ble Apex Court, the law cited by the authorized representative for the worker applies to the case in hand

with full swing.

23.

It is also contended by the authorized representative for the worker that the action of the management in

terminating the services of the worker is punitive and he relied upon a decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court

reported in 2006, Supreme Court Cases (L&S) between Hari Ram Maurya versus Union of India and others

wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court has held that Termination of service if punitive, inquiry therefore,

mandatory-held even though appellant is a temporary employee his services cannot be terminated on charge of

bribery without holding an inquiry and hereafter acting in accordance with law. In the present case also worker

is alleged to have absconded from service without any information with effect from 01.08.89, therefore, his

termination from the service without inquiry is punitive and without conducting inquiry by the management

termination of the service of the worker cannot be justified being in violation of rules of natural justice.

24.

The worker has also pleaded violation of the provisions of section 25F, 25G and 25H of the Industrial Disputes

Act, 1947. In his pleadings and in his evidence the worker has stated that he continuously worked during the

period 24.08.87 to 30.07.89 and his services have been terminated with effect from 01.08.89 by the

management without complying with the provisions of the Act. The management witness half heartedly has

admitted the working of the worker by stating that the worker himself left the job on 30.07.89 and also that

Sri M K Gupta an employee of the railway has issued casual labour card no. 11888 on behalf of railway.

Therefore, in the light of above evidence of management witness it is established that the worker had worked

continuously for more than 240 days and it is so the railway administration was highly obliged to comply with

the provisions of 25F of the Act, and admittedly it has not been complied with by the railway administration by

paying the worker one month’s notice, notice pay in lieu of notice and retrenchment compensation. Thus it is

proved that the action of the railway administration in breach of provision of section 25F of the Act.

4334

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

25.

The worker has also stated in his pleadings and in his evidence that he attained the status of MRCL from daily

rated casual labor on 28.07.87 which fact has not been denied by the management either in its pleading or

evidence. Hence it is proved by the worker that he was granted temporary status by the railway administration

much before his termination from the service of the railway. Even from the documents filed and proved by the

worker it is proved that he was in the employment of the management as claimed by him.

26.

Therefore, having concluded that the worker was in the employment of the railway, worker having attained the

status of MRCL and also that the railway has badly breached the provisions of section 25F of the Act, hence the

action of the railway administration of Mathura Junction in terminating the services of Sri Dhanmender Singh

alias Dharmendra Singh son of Sri Dangal Singh Ex-MRCL w.e.f. 01.08.89, is neither legal nor justified.

27.

So far as question of regularizing the services of the worker is concerned no observation by this tribunal can be

given as it is the sole prerogative of the management to consider regularization of the worker in the service of

the railway administration. However, railway administration is directed to consider the case of the worker for

his regularization within six months from the date of publication of the award.

28.

Accordingly it is held that the worker is entitled to be reinstated in the service of the railway administration

w.e.f 01.08.89 on the same status and pay that was drawn by him but he will not be entitled for any back wages

because in his pleadings though the worker has pleaded that he is out of employment but in his evidence he has

failed to prove that he was never gainfully employed any where else. He shall also be deemed to be in

continuous service of railway administration.

29.

Reference is accordingly decided in favor of the worker and against the railway administration.

SHUBHENDRA KUMAR, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 14 twu] 2018

dk-vk- 976.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj baMlySaM

cSad fyfeVsM ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] y[kuÅ ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 30@2017) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 14-

06-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&12025@01@2018&vkbZvkj (ch&I)º

jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 14th June, 2018

S.O. 976.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 30/2017) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Lucknow as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Induslnd Bank

Ltd. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 14.06.2018.

[No. L-12025/01/2018-IR (B-I)]

RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW

PRESENT : RAKESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer

I.D. No. 30/2017

BETWEEN :

Sri Shashi Karan Nath Singh S/o Shri Shiv Karan Nath Singh

R/o 227, Samar Vihar Colony, Alambagh,

Lucknow-226005 (UP)

AND

1. The Managing Director,

Induslnd Bank Ltd., Corporate Office

8th Floor, 1, One India Bulls Centre, Jupiter

Mills Compound, 841, S.B. Marg, Elphinstone Road

(West) Mumbai-400 013

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940

4335

2.

Head Human Resources, Human Resources Dept.

Induslnd Bank Limited

8th Floor, 1, One India Bulls Centre, Jupiter

Mills Compound, 841, S.B. Marg, Elphinstone Road

(West) Mumbai-400 013

3.

Head Employees Relations, Human Resources Dept.

8th Floor, 1, One India Bulls Centre, Jupiter

Mills Compound, 841, S.B. Marg, Elphinstone Road

(West) Mumbai-400 013

4.

Regional Head, Branch Banking

Induslnd Bank Ltd. Plot No.628/10A, Khasra No.594/3

Faizabad Road, Indira Nagar, Lucknow-2260016

5.

Mr. Prakash Thacker, Enquiry Officer/Zonal HR

Partner-Banking Branch

8th Floor, 1, One India Bulls Centre, Jupiter

Mills Compound, 841, S.B. Marg, Elphinstone Road

(West) Mumbai-400 013

AWARD

1.

The workman Sri Shashi Karan Nath Singh has filed petition under Section 2A of the I.D. Act., mentioning

therein that he was appointed on 27.09.2012 in the establishment of the opposite party, on the post of Dy Vice

President. The applicant has asserted that although nomenclature of Dy. Vice President was given, yet he was

never vested with any powers like managerial, administrative or supervisory, rather his nature of duties was

purely clerical and operational. Subsequently he was promoted to the post Dy. Vice President-II and later on

Regional Head, Operational. It is alleged in the claim statement W-1 that the employees working in the

establishment of the opposite party are being given such nomenclature of post so that they may be ousted from

the perview of the “workman” and such employees may not take the shelter of Labour Laws such as I.D. Act.,

etc. The employees are being intentionally deprived of the benefits provided under the Labour Laws and

Gratuity laws.

2.

It has further been alleged in the claim statement that charge sheet dated 23.12.2016 was issued against the

petitioner which was served on him on 26.12.2016, an enquiry officer was appointed hurriedly. The workman

submitted his reply and refuted all the allegations, presenting officer was appointed, he appeared before the

Enquiry Officer and requested to provide relevant documents and the Defence Representative. It was

communicated to the workman there is heavy pressure from the side of the management to conclude the enquiry

on the same day and formalities were observed by the Enquiry Officer, and Enquiry Officer persuaded that he

would only get minor punishment viz. warning or censure. In such circumstances the petitioner did not cross

examine the management witness, after conclusion of the enquiry show cause notice dated 09.01.2017 was

issued, the reply was submitted by the petitioner and the petitioner emphasized that he had never accepted the

charges leveled against him. Separation and exit Interview Information was given through E-Mail etc. An order

of punishment dated 24.3.2017 was passed and opposite party imposed the punishment of dismissal from the

service of the bank without any notice. No independent witness was produced before the eenquiry officer.

Hence principle of natural justice was not followed. The concerned workman was not provided opportunity to

cross examine the material witness.

3.

The petitioner has alleged that the law laid down by the Hon Supreme Court in several cases has not been

followed by the management, under compelling circumstances the workman approached to RLC ( C ) Lucknow

through an application under Section 2A of the I.D. Act., cognizance was taken by him notice was issued to the

employer. The management did not attend the proceedings before the RLC ( C ), Lucknow, in the mean while

an E-Mail was sent to the workman regarding pending dues etc. Having no other alternative the workman

sought permission to file the case before this Tribunal. With the aforesaid pleadings request has been made to

set aside the order of punishment dated 24.3.2017, reinstating him with all consequential benefits including full

back wages etc.

4.

The management has filed written statement M-4, with denial of the allegation leveled in the claim statement.

The opposite party has asserted that the petitioner was employed in the managerial and supervisory capacity and

he is not covered under the definition of the “workman”. The opposite party has requested that applicant is not

entitled to any relief.

4336

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

5.

During the proceeding before this Court the workman has moved an application W-5 dated 29.11.2017

expressing his wish to withdraw the case from CGIT, Lucknow. The management has endorsed his no objection

on this application. Arguments of both the parties have been heard at length and record has been scanned

thoroughly.

6.

The workman mentioning his designation as Dy. Vice President/Regional Head, has claimed that managerial,

administrative or supervisory powers were not vested on him. Dismissal order dated 24.3.17 has been

challenged. The management has asserted that the petitioner is not covered under the definition of “workman”.

However, since the petitioner himself has expressed his desire to withdraw the case, no relief can be granted to

him. Accordingly the petition W-1 as being not pressed, is liable to be dismissed. The petitioner is not entitled

to any relief.

7.

Award as above.

LUCKNOW

30.01.2018

RAKESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 14 twu] 2018

dk-vk- 977.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj mÙkj

if'pe jsyos ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] t;iqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 50@2013) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 14-06-

2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&41011@30@2013&vkbZvkj (ch&I)º

jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 14th June, 2018

S.O. 977.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 50/2013) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Jaipur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of North Western

Railway and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 14.06.2018.

[No. L-41011/30/2013-IR (B-I)]

RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, JAIPUR

PRAMOD KUMAR CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

I.D. 50/2013

Reference No. L-41011/30/2013-IR (B-I) Dated: 4.10.2013

The President

Ajmer Jila Asangathit Shramik Sangh

306/34, Gurjar Tilla, Nagara,

Ajmer.

V/S

The Divisional Personnal Officer

North western Railway

Divisional Office

Ajmer.

For the applicant

:

Sh. R.C.Jain, Representative.

For the non-applicant

:

Shri L.P.Singhal, Advocate.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940

4337

AWARD

17.4.2018

1.

The Central Government in exercise of the powers conferred under clause (d) of Sub Section 1 & 2 (A) of

Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 has referred the following Industrial dispute to this tribunal for

adjudication:-

“Whether the action of the management of North west Railway, Ajmer in not providing free pass,

P.T.O. facility, re-payment of tution fees to the family of workman Shri Rajesh Bhart is legal and

justified? To what relief she is entitled?”

2.

The case was called for several times. None responds for the applicant side. Advocate for opposite party is

present.

3.

The schedule which has been referred by Government of India/Bharat Sarkar, Ministry of Labour/Shram

Mantralaya dated 4.10.2013 indicates that the facilities demanding free pass, P.T.O. facility, repayment of tuition fees

to the family of workman Rajesh Bharti does not come within the jurisdiction of this tribunal because the statement of

claim has been submitted by the wife of the workman Rajesh Bharti who has been shown working as Station Master,

Railway Singawal, Distt: Ajmer. The so called workman Rajesh Bharti is still working as Station Master & he has

deserted his wife alongwith her/his children & has not been maintaining his wife & children but Rajesh Bharti has not

raised the aforesaid dispute regarding aforesaid reliefs.

4.

Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act defines the ‘workman’ as under:-

“(s) “workman” means any person (including an apprentice) employed in any industry to do any manual,

unskilled, skilled, technical, operational, clerical or supervisory work for hire or reward, whether the terms of

employment be express or implied, and for the purposes of any proceeding under this Act in relation to an

industrial dispute, includes any such person who has been dismissed, discharged or retrenched in connection

with, or as a consequence of, that dispute, or whose dismissal, discharge or retrenchment has led to that dispute,

but does not include any such person----

(i)

Who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950) , or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the

Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957) ; or

(ii)

Who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employees of a prison, or

(iii)

Who is employed mainly in a managerial or administrative capacity, or

(iv)

Who, being employed in a supervisory capacity, draws wages exceeding ( ten thousand rupees) per

mensem oir exercises, wither by the nature of the duties attached to the office or by reason of the powers

vested in him, functions mainly of a managerial nature.”

5.

The statement of claim submitted by wife of Rajesh Bharti indicates that Rajesh Bharti is a Station Master who

cannot be a workman u/s 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act because first he has been holding a managerial/supervisory

post & has also been drawing more than Rs.10,000/- as per the pay commission with a grade pay of Rs.4200/-. Wife of

Rajesh Bharti who is claiming her rights through his husband cannot come to the Central Government Industrial

Tribunal Cum Labour Court because first her husband must be the workman as per the definition of the section 2(s) of

the Industrial Disputes Act. Secondly she has a matrimonial dispute with her husband before the whole dispute come to

the jurisdiction of the Family Court or if the management of the Indian Railway does not provides such facilities to the

applicant wife of Rajesh Bharti than she may straight way go to the Central Administrative Tribunal as her husband’s

service matter can only be adjudicated in Central Administrative Tribunal.

6.

Reference is not maintainable in this tribunal & liable to be disposed off as not maintainable.

7.

Award as above.

PRAMOD KUMAR CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 20 twu] 2018

dk-vk- 978.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj Hkkjrh;

LVsV cSad ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] ukxiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 20@2013) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 20-06-2018 dks

çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&12012@05@2013&vkbZvkj (ch&I)º

jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

4338

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 20th June, 2018

S.O. 978.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 20/2013) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Nagpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of

India and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 20.06.2018.

[No. L-12012/05/2013-IR (B-I)]

RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI S.S. GARG, PRESIDING OFFICER, CGIT-CUM-LABOUR COURT, NAGPUR

Case No. CGIT/NGP/20/2013

Date: 10.05.2018

Party No.1

:

The Asstt. General Manager

State Bank of India,

Zonal Office, Region-III,

S.V. Patel Marg, Kingsway,

Nagpur- 440 001.

V/s.

Party No.2

:

Sh. Dnyandeo Nivrutti Patil,

R/o. 40, Bigha Deshmukh

Nagar, Malkapur, Distt.

Buldhana (MS)

AWARD

(Dated: 10th May, 2018)

In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of section 10 of

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) (“the Act” in short), the Central Government has referred the industrial

dispute between the employers, in relation to the management of State Bank of India and their workman, Shri Dyandeo

Nivrutti Patil, for adjudication, as per letter No.L-12012/05/2013-IR (B-I) dated 21.05.2013, with the following

schedule:-

“Whether the action of the management of State Bank of India to discharge Shri Dnyandeo Niwrutti

Patil from the service is legal and justified? If not, then what relief the workman is entitled to? And

whether the quantum of punishment imposed upon him is proportionate to the misconduct so alleged?

If not, then what relief the workman is entitled to?”

2.

On receipt of the reference, parties were noticed to file their respective statement of claim and written

statement, in response to which, the workman Shri Dyandeo Nivrutti Patil, (“the workman” in short) filed the statement

of claim and the management of State Bank of India (“party no.1” in short) filed the written statement.

3.

Workman filed a statement of claim by asserting that he was appointed as a clerk and transferred at Malkapur

Branch in 07.09.1994. He also mentioned that his appointment was on compassionate ground because his father was

died in service of SBI.

Management decided to initiate disciplinary proceeding against him and charge sheet was issued on

09.10.2003. According to the workman enquiry was conducted by bank, enquiry report was submitted by the enquiry

officer, disciplinary authority punished him on 14.01.2008 as discharged from the service and applicant was removed

from the service on 28.01.2008. He files an appeal on 01.03.2008 which was dismissed.

According to the workman the departmental enquiry was conducted against him was not legal, fair and proper,

because enquiry officer and branch manager are friends to each other and enquiry officer was biased and prejudice to

him so the enquiry officer has not considered the evidence produced on his behalf as his defence. He also asserted that

judgment of enquiry officer is full of bias and entire report is perverse. He also prayed that the order of termination

will be set aside and he prayed for the reinstatement with full back wages and other consequential benefits.

4.

Management filed the written statement on 12.02.2014 and denied all material facts by asserting that charge

was fully proved and full opportunity was granted in conduction of departmental enquiry. Bank was also asserted that

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940

4339

charge sheet, report, show cause notice and punishment was given properly. Workman appeared before the

disciplinary authority to present his case through his defence representative. Disciplinary authority heard the workman

and his defence representative at length on the point of punishment. According to the management appellate authority

passed a proper judgment. According to the management his termination is just and proper so he is not entitled to any

relief.

5.

Both parties admitted that workman was appointed as clerk and posted at Malkapur Branch, District Buldhana.

It is also admitted that charge was framed on 09.10.2003 and workman was terminated from services on 14.01.2008. It

is also admitted that workman was governed by Shastri and Desai award and bipartite settlement.

6.

As this is a case of dismissal of the workman from services, after holding a departmental enquiry, the validity

of the departmental enquiry was taken as a preliminary issue for consideration and by order dated 23.03.2018, the

departmental enquiry conducted against the workman was held to be legal, proper and in accordance with the principles

of natural justice.

7.

On behalf of workman it was argued that the punishment was disproportionate. It was also argued on behalf

of the workman that, branch manager falsely called complaint from Mr. Laxminarayan Sharma by falsely promising

loan or cash credit. He also argued that, charge levelled against the workman is vague and the workman was

pressurized and dishonestly pursued it not to make complaint against the workman. According to the workman,

complaint was made by deceipt and falsehood but document Exhibit W-VIII and IX show a different defence as stated

in the statement of claim. So, this argument is not sustainable in my view.

8.

On the contrary, on behalf of the management it was argued that all charges against the workman was duly

proved and bank imposed punishment of dismissal without notice as per service condition applicable to the workman.

He also argued that judicial review had limited scope for the Tribunal and Tribunal did not act as appellate court. He

relied on the following case laws:-

Union of India Vs. Parma Nanda 1989 SCC (L&S) 303, Union Bank of India Vs. Vishwa Mohan 1998 (4)

SCC 310 1998 LIC 2514, SBI Vs. Bela Bagchi 2005 SCC (L&S) 940 and Syed T.A. Vs. Naqshbandi Vs. State

of JK 2003 SCC(L&S) 1151= (2003) 9 SCC 592, State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur Vs Nemichand, Civil

Appeal No. 5861 of 2007, SC dated 01.03.2011, Regional Manager, U.P.S.R.T.C. Vs Hotilal, HP RTC Vs.

Hukumchand 2009 2 SCC (L&S) 615, Mihir Kumar Hazara Vs. LIC (2017) 2 SCC (L&S) 875, Deputy

Commissioner Vs. J. Hussain (2013) 2 SCC (L&S) 833 and SBI Vs. Samarendra Kishore 1994 SCC (S&S)

687, in which following legal principles are laid down:-

i.

It is now well settled that the courts will not act as an appellate court and reassess the evidence led in

the domestic enquiry, nor interfere on the ground that another view is possible on the material on

record.

ii.

Therefore, courts will not interfere with findings of fact recorded in departmental enquires, except

where such findings are based on no evidence or where they are clearly perverse. The test to find out

perversity is to see whether a Tribunal acting reasonably could have arrived at such conclusion or

finding, on the material on record. Courts will however interfere with the findings in disciplinary

matters, if principles of natural justice or statutory regulations have been violated or if the order is

found to be arbitrary, capricious, malafide or based on extraneous considerations.

iii.

When a court is considering whether punishment of ‘termination from service’ imposed upon a bank

employee is shockingly excessive or disproportionate to the gravity of the proved misconduct, the loss

of confidence in the employee will be an important and relevant factor.

iv.

That having regard to the gravity of the established misconduct, the punishing authority had the power

and jurisdiction to impose punishment.

v.

Legal position would establish that the disciplinary authority, and on appeal the appellate authority,

being fact-finding authorities have exclusive power to consider the evidence with a view to maintain

discipline. They are invested with the discretion to impose appropriate punishment keeping in view

the magnitude or gravity of the misconduct.

vi

The position in our country, in administrative law, where no fundamental freedoms as aforesaid are

involved, is that the courts/tribunals will only play a secondary role while the primary judgment as to

reasonableness will remain with the executive or administrative authority.

4340

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

vii.

Court interfered with the punishment only after coming to the conclusion that the punishment was in

outrageous defiance of logic and was shocking.

viii.

If the charged employee holds a position of trust where honesty and integrity are inbuilt requirements

of functioning, it would not be proper to deal with the matter leniently. Misconduct in such cases has

to be dealt with iron hands.

ix.

Misrepresentation itself amounts to fraud, and further held fraudulent misrepresentation is called deceit

and consists in lending a man into damage by willfully or recklessly causing him to believe and act on

falsehood.

x.

If the initial action is not in consonance with law, the subsequent conduct of a party cannot sanctify the

same.

xi.

“Having regard to the seriousness of the charges coupled with virtually…………………………

punishment of dismissal was proportionate to misconduct warranting no leniency”

xii.

“Merely because in opinion of Court lesser punishment would have been more appropriate, cannot be a

ground to interfere with discretion of departmental authorities”.

xiii.

“Supply of copy to the charges employee-Cases where punishment was imposed ……………….. Non-

supply of the copy to the respondent held on facts, did not invalidate the enquiry”.

9.

Now I will discuss the evidence with reference to the argument of the workman. Workman in para no. 16 and

18 of his statement, admitted that, charge sheet was received on 09.10.2003 and he filed reply on 13.12.2003 by letter

Exhibit W-7, in which, he admitted that, he know Mr. L.S. Sharma and he had given money for depositing in RD

account and furnished the entry on pass book and by mistaken, he had forgotten to deposit the money in RD account at

the same day. He has also accepted that, Mr. Sharma gave him Rs. 4000/- due to relationship.

10.

The workman in para 21 also admitted that, he received second show cause notice alongwith the copy of the

departmental enquiry report but he did not submit any reply to that show cause notice. He was also given an

opportunity for personal hearing. He also filed an appeal against the punishment, which was dismissed.

11.

On this admission management counsel relied on the following case law:- Chairman & Managing Director

V.S.P. Vs. Gopal Raju Sri Prabhakara Hari Babu (2008) 2 SCC(L&S) 311 and Himachal Pradesh Road Transport Vs.

Hukumchand (2009) 2 SCC (L&S) 615 in which it was held that (1) “Held, detailed enquiry need not be held- Penalty

based on respondent’s admission that he unauthorisedly absented, was valid in view of the Evidence Act, 1872, S.58”.

(2) “Employee’s own admission of misconduct- Enquiry in such an eventuality, held not necessary- Administrative

Law – Natural justice”.

12.

On the perusal of the record it appears that the departmental enquiry was conducted properly and sufficient

opportunity was given to the workman on behalf of the management. In my opinion there was no legal defect in the

departmental enquiry.

13.

As far as quantum of punishment is concerned it is well settled that the disciplinary authority and appellate

authority being the fact finding authority. So this Tribunal is not an appellate authority i.e. Tribunal will only play

secondary roll while the primary judgment as to reasonableness will remain with the executive or administrative

authority. It is also clear from the above case law that jurisdiction of the Tribunal is very limited and its power to

interfere with disciplinary matters is also limited. It is also laid down in the case law that Tribunal cannot set aside a

well reasoned order only on sympathy or sentiments. It is also laid down that the superior court only in some cases

invoke doctrine of proportionality if decision of an employer is found within the legal parameter, the jurisdiction

would ordinarily not be invoked when misconduct stand proved.

14.

In view of the discussion made above and the materials on record, it is found that there is no scope to interfere

with the order of the punishment of dismissal passed against the workman from services with superannuation benefits

i.e. (P.F/Gratuity as would be due otherwise under Rules and Regulations prevailing at the relevant time without

disqualification for future employment as per Para 6 (d) of the Memorandum of Settlement dated 10.04.2002 for

Workmen staff as per document Exhibit W-III). Hence, it is ordered:-

ORDER

The action of the management of State Bank of India to discharge Shri Dnyandeo Niwrutti Patil from

the service is legal and justified. The quantum of punishment imposed upon him is proportionate to the

misconduct so alleged. The workman is not entitled to any relief.

S. S. GARG, Presiding Officer

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940

4341

ubZ fnYyh] 20 twu] 2018

dk-vk- 979.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj Js;l

xzkeh.k cSad ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] dkuiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 80@2013) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 20-

06-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&12011@48@2012&vkbZvkj (ch&I)º

jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 20th June, 2018

S.O. 979.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 80/2013) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Kanpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Shreyas Gramin

Bank and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 20.06.2018.

[No. L-12011/48/2012-IR (B-I)]

RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI SHUBHENDRA KUMAR, HJS PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOR COURT, KANPUR

ID No. 80 of 2013

Shri R P Singh

Member WC, UP Bank Workers’ Organization,

3/13, Mathura Nagar.

VS

The Chairman,

Shreyas Gramin Bank,

Head Office, Diggi Road,

ALIGARH(U.P)-202001

AWARD

1.

Central Govt. Mol, New Delhi, vide notification no. L-12011/48/2012-IR (B-1) dated 20.06.13, has referred the

following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal.

2.

Whether the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank, Aligarh has discriminated the provisions of Regional Rural

Bank (Officers & Staff Recruitment & Promotion) Rules, 2010 by recruiting and promoting the officers/staff in

the Bank in accordance with old Rules, 1998 even after existence of the New Rules? And if so, what action

would be proposed against the management to provide relief to affected candidates.”

3.

In short the case set up by the union is that the management in supersession of earlier rules regarding

Appointment and Promotion of officers and employees, Rules, 1998, has framed (Appointment and Promotion

of officers and employees) Rules, 2000 which was duly notified by the Government of India in its official

gazette dated 13.07.2010. The Board of Directors of the Bank in its meeting dated 29.09.2010 has adopted these

rules. It is also alleged that the Chairman, Shreyas Gramin Bank in its circular dated 25.09.2010 has clearly

mentioned that these rules have come into force from the date of their publication and it is therefore, clarified

that any further recruitment and promotion shall be conducted as per these rules. It is also alleged that in the

existence of Rules 2010, Rules framed in the year 1998 has lost its significance. The Chairman of the bank to

fulfill his personal interest by invoking the rules framed in the year 1998 which is said to be not in existence in

an illegal manner, has taken an illegal decision and issued a circular dated 10.02.11 which has adversely

affected the interest of employees and officers of Shreyas Gramin Bank. Union has also cited certain

provision of Appointment and Promotion of Officers and Employees Rules, 1998 and 2010. It is also stated that

the management before Hon’ble High Court has filed an affidavit wherein it is stated as to how recruitment and

promotions of the officers and employees is to be done on the basis of post assessed by the management which

smacks with biasness and malafide intention of the management. Management has appointed and promoted the

4342

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

officers and employees in the bank on whimsical grounds according to Rules 1998, which is illegal and non-est

in the eye of law, therefore, and on the basis of above it has been prayed that the officers and employees those

have been promoted in accordance with Appointment & Promotion of officers and employees, Rules, 1998

instead of Appointment & Promotion of officers and employees, Rules, 2010, being illegal is liable to turned

down.

4.

Manageme has filed their reply in which it is alleged that Shreyas Gramin Bank is sponsored bank of Bank of

India and Canara Bank and now is known as Gramin Bank Aryavart. Central Government is the appropriate

authority to frame the rules regarding appointment and promotion in Regional Gramin Banks in consultation

with the sponsor bank and NABARD and according the Government of India in exercise of powers under

section 29 of RRB Act, framed appointment and promotion rules 2010 by superseding earlier rules framed in

the year 1998 and the same were published by the Government in the Gazette of India dated 13.07.10. The

management has categorically denied the averments made by the union in paragraph no.1 to 7. As per guide line

issued by the Government, bank made manpower assessment for creation of vacancies as on 31.03.10 and

submitting the same for vetting by the sponsor bank which was approved by the sponsor bank vide letter dated

08.12.2010. On the basis of communication issued by the Government of India, it was clarified that the

vacancies which existed prior to the publication of new rules would be filled as per rules which existed at the

relevant time, the sponsor bank advised to fill up the vacancies as per promotion rules 1998 and the matter was

put up before he Board which permitted to fill up the vacancies as pr Promotion Rules 1998, as the vacancies

existed on 31.03.2010. It is also stated that the Board ma in consultation with its sponsor bank determine the

number of vacancies in each category of posts to be filled up. After clearance by Board, the management started

appointment and promotions of officers and employees category wise to fill up the vacant post and after holding

written test and interview for promotion to Officer Grade I list of successful candidates were communicated by

circular no.39/11. The selection of candidates was made strictly as per provisions of appointment and promotion

rules 1998.

5.

Lastly it is alleged that the action of the management is in accordance with the provisions of appointment and

promotions of officers and employees rules 1998, and no illegality has been committed by the management,

therefore, it is prayed that the claim of the union being devoid of merit is liable to be rejected.

6.

Union has not filed rejoinder.

7.

Management has filed photocopies of 8 documents per list dated 20.02.18, whereas no document has been filed

by the union in support of its case.

8.

None appeared on behalf of worker to submit arguments; I have heard the AR for the worker & perused the

record.

9.

It is pertinent to mention that by a bare perusal of the entire record it is evident that as no evidence in support of

the claim petition has been adduced by the union, management also preferred not to lead any evidence as it is

the claimant union who is highly burdened to prove its case by adducing material and relevant evidence as is

required under law and since the union has completely failed to discharge their obligation to prove their claim,

the reference is bound to be answered against the Union holding that the union is not entitled for any relief for

want of evidence and proof.

10.

There is yet another aspect of the matter to be considered by the tribunal. From the pleadings of the union it is

amply clear that on the basis of assertion made by it, the union is seeking the relief for cancelation of their

promotions and appointment against those selected and promoted employees of the bank who were promoted

by invoking the Appointment and Promotion of Officers and Employees, Rules 1998, but the union has not

made them a party to the present dispute. It is settled legal position that courts are not empowered to grant any

relief to a party against a person who had not been made a party to the dispute. Therefore, from this angle also

the reference is liable to be answered against the Union holding that the union is not entitled for the relief which

has been claimed by it.

11.

Accordingly, the reference is answered in the above terms against the Union and it is held that the union is not

entitled for any relief.

SHUBHENDRA KUMAR, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 20 twu] 2018

dk-vk- 980.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj Hkkjrh;

LVsV cSad ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940

4343

vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky; ua- 1] fnYyh ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 100@2013) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

20-06-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&12012@26@2012&vkbZvkj (ch&I)º

jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 20th June, 2018

S.O. 980.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 100/2013) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court No. 1, Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank

of India and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 20.06.2018.

[No. L-12012/26/2012-IR (B-I)]

RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE PRESIDING OFFICER: CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR

COURT No.1: ROOM No.511, DWARKA COURT COMPLEX, SECTOR 10, DWARKA, DELHI

ID No. 100/2013

Shri Jagdish P Kanojia,

K.G. I/535, Vikaspuri,

New Delhi

…Workman

Versus

The Deputy General Manager(Operation),

Appellate Authority, State Bank of India,

Local Head Office,

New Delhi

…Managements

AWARD

A reference under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes

Act, 1947(in short the Act) was received from the Central Government, Ministry of Labour and Employment for

adjudication vide letter No.L-12012/26/2012-IR(B-I) dated 21.06.2012 for adjudication of an industrial dispute with the

following terms:

‘Whether the action of the management of State Bank of India, New Delhi in imposing the penalty of removal

from service upon Shri Jagdish Prasad Kanojia vide their order dated 17.08.2004 instead of accepting his

resignation dated 13.11.2002 and in not paying terminal benefits to him is legal and justified? To what relief

the workman is entitled ?

2.

Brief facts giving rise to the instant reference are that Shri Jagdish Prasad Kanojia (hereinafter referred to as the

claimant) joined services with State Bank of India (hereinafter referred to as the management ) on 22.07.1980 from

Sports Quota as he was a national level football player. Claimant later on suffered injuries and was under treatment

during the period 2001-02. Surprisingly, without considering anything in empathy, treated the claimant on unauthorized

absence from duties and was ordered to join duties immediately. Claimant was under depression and he was serve with

charge sheet dated 06.07.2002. Due to his ill health the claimant was not in a position to get assistance from his union

or any other official of the bank. Verbal assurance was given by the Disciplinary Authority through officials of the

union to take a lenient view of the matter in case his resignation is submitted by the claimant to the management. He

was also assured that terminal benefits after acceptance of his resignation. Resultantly, his resignation was submitted

by the claimant and the same was not later on accepted and it was stated that enquiry proceedings are pending against

the claimant on account of his unauthorized absence. Thereafter, the claimant again made a request for reconsideration

of his resignation retrospectively but it was of no use. However, claimant was not in a position to either to attend the

enquiry or to attend his duties. His request remained unattended. Finally, the claimant received order dated

17.08.2004 removing him from service with effect from 03.05.2001. Pension of the claimant was not settled. Finally,

a prayer ha been made by the claimant to set aside the departmental proceedings as well as his order of removal.

3.

Management has contested the case by filing written statement wherein preliminary objections have been taken

that the reference is hopelessly time barred as the claimant was removed from serviced on 03.05.2001 and reference

was raised belatedly in 2013. On merits, the management has denied most of the averments and it has been alleged that

charge sheet dated 06.07.2002 for his unauthorized absence was issued to the claimant . No assurance was given by the

4344

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Assistant General Manager regarding acceptance of resignation or for payment of terminal benefits to the claimant.

Commensurating with the gravity of misconduct, claimant was imposed punishment of ‘removal without notice’ in

terms of Bipartite Settlement vide orders dated 17.08.2004. Claimant has not made any reference against the enquiry

report or orders of the Disciplinary Authority and he tendered his resignation on 13.11.2002 when the departmental

enquiry was pending against him. His resignation was not accepted by the competent authority Finally, a prayer has

been made for dismissal of the reference.

4.

Against this factual background, this Tribunal on the pleadings of the parties, framed the following issues:

(i)

Whether enquiry conducted against the claimant was just, fair and proper?

(ii)

Whether punishment awarded to the claimant commensurate to his misconduct?

(iii) As in terms of reference.

5.

Issue No.(i) was treated as preliminary issue as it elated to the departmental enquiry. Both parties were granted

opportunity to adduce evidence. However, only the claimant has filed his affidavit Ex.WW1/A and affidavit of

Ms.Radha Kanojia, Ex.WW2/A and Shri Kanojia, WW1 also tendered in evidence documents Ex.WW1/1 to

Ex.WW1/4. I shall be referring to these document during the course of my discussion. Management has not adduced

any evidence in support of the allegations contained in charge sheet dated 16.07.2002. Record of the case shows that

the management was accorded several opportunities to adduce evidence but management failed to put in its appearance

and hence management was proceeded ex-parte on 07.03.2017. Thereafter, the said order was set aside by this

Tribunal vide order dated 31.07.2017. Despite setting aside of the previous order, more than six opportunities were

granted to the management to bring evidence on the domestic enquiry and finally Shri Inderjit Singh, vide his statement

dated 17.01.2018 stated that the management does not want to adduce evidence on the preliminary issue and would like

to straightaway advance arguments on the preliminary issue. It is pertinent to note here that during pendency of the

proceedings before this Tribunal, the claimant Shri J.P. Kanojia expired and application was made before this Tribunal

for bring on record legal heirs of Shri Kanojia, which was allowed by this Tribunal vide order dated 10.04.2018.

Before his death, Shri J.P. Kanojia , the claimant herein, entered the witness box and was examined as WW1 and his

affidavit is Ex.WW1/A. He has also relied on certain documents.

6.

The main question before this Tribunal is whether the domestic enquiry conducted against the claimant herein

which finally resulted in his removal vide order dated 17.08.2004 is fair and has been conducted in accordance with

principles of natural justice or not. At this stage, it is pertinent to mention here that copy of charge sheet has not been

filed by the management, much less the proceedings of the enquiry.

7.

Admittedly, the claimant has not filed any reply to the charge sheet and claimant has categorically stated that an

assurance was given to him by the senior officials of the bank that in case he tenders his resignation, he would be paid

all his terminal benefits, including his pensionary benefits. It was also urged that the management has backed out of

its promise and taking undue advantage of the position of the claimant has passed order of ‘removal from service’

against him.

8.

Shri Inderjit Singh, A/R for the management urged that since the claimant has not participated in the enquiry

proceedings nor filed any reply or tendered any evidence during the course of domestic enquiry, as such allegations

made in the charge sheet stands proved. It has been fairly conceded by the learned A/R for the management that

proceedings of enquiry has not been filed on court record, however, report of the Enquiry Officer has been filed on

record. It was further submitted that resignation was submitted on 13.11.2002 by the claimant. However, the same

was not accepted by the competent authority in view of the pendency of the domestic enquiry against the workman.

Finally, order of ‘removal from service’ was passed against the claimant on 13.08.2004. Learned A/R for the

management has conceded in all fairness that no show cause was served on the claimant.

9.

Now, the main question which arises for consideration before this Tribunal is whether the enquiry has been

conducted in a fair manner and the same is in consonance with principles of natural justice. Apparently, the claimant

has not participated in the departmental enquiry and everything has been done by the management at behind the back of

the claimant. However, law is clear that even if a delinquent official has been proceeded ex-parte by the management

in the departmental proceedings, still it is incumbent upon the management to prove the charges leveled against the

delinquent official as required under the law. Even if an employee refuses to participate in the enquiry, the employer

cannot straightaway dismiss him but he must hold an ex-parte enquiry where evidence must be led. I find support to

this view of mine in the judgement of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Saroj Kumar

Sinha (2010) 2 SCC 772, wherein it is held as under:

“An inquiry Officer acting in a quasi judicial authority is in the position of an independent adjudicator. He is not

supposed to ne a representative of the department/disciplinary authority/Government. His function is to

examine the evidence presented by the Department, even in the absence of the delinquent official to see as to

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940

4345

whether the unrebutted evidence is sufficient to hold that the charges are proved. In the present case, the

aforesaid has not been observed. Since no oral evidence has been examined, the documents have not been

proved and could not have been taken into consideration to conclude that the charges have been proved against

the respondents.’

10.

To buttress his submissions, the A/R for the management relied on the judgement of the Apex Court in New

India Assurance Co. Ltd vs S.M.I. Kazim (2001) LLR 825 and J.P. Sharma vs. Punjab National Bank (1996) LLR 92.

I have carefully gone through both the judgements relied upon by the management. Ratio of the above rulings is not

applicable to the controversy on hand merely because the claimant has not participated in the enquiry or the

proceedings were held ex-parte in the domestic enquiry would not mean that the charge sheet served on the claimant

stands ipso facto proved. As discussed above, management is required to adduce evidence in view of the ratio in Saroj

Kumar Sinha case (supra).

11.

In the case on hand, management has not examined the Enquiry Officer or any other official so as to prove the

domestic enquiry. To my mind, merely because the claimant herein has not joined the domestic proceedings, that

would not mean that allegations against the claimant stands proved. Claimant had given his resignation vide letter

dated 15.06.2004 Ex.WW1/3. Thereafter, as is clear from letter Ex.WW1/4, the Assistant General Manager

recommended that resignation of the claimant be accepted in terms of para 6(b) of the Memorandum of Settlement of

Disciplinary Proceedings dated 10.04.2002. Ex.WW1/2 is the letter of the Enquiry Officer wherein copy of enquiry

report was forwarded to the claimant for making his representation/submission, if any on the same. It is clear from

perusal of the proceedings conducted by the Enquiry Officer that the claimant was not present during the course of

enquiry though registered letter was sent to the claimant after launching of the proceedings against him. However, the

enquiry report is silent as to who were the witnesses who were examined so as to prove the allegations made in the

charge sheet served on the claimant. Enquiry Officer has blindly accepted the allegations made in the charge sheet for

the simple reason that the claimant has not participated in the departmental proceedings. As discussed above, it was

incumbent upon the management to have prima facie to have proved the allegations contained in the charge sheet, as

required under the law. Further, it was also imperative to have examined management witness so as to prove

unauthorized absence of the claimant during the relevant period.

12.

There is another aspect of the matter which cannot be ignored. Management has admittedly not filed record of

proceedings of enquiry before this Court. Management has also not examined any witness before this Tribunal though

several opportunities were given to the management. Resultantly, evidence adduced by the claimant remains un-

rebutted. There is considerable force in the submissions raised on behalf of the claimant that due to submission of his

resignation, he was given an impression that the same would be accepted by the competent authority and terminal

benefits would be paid to him. It is not out of place to mention here that the claimant has now expired on 17.03.2018

and is survived by his wife Ms.Radha Kanojia, and daughters Ms.Varsha Kumar & Ms.Ritu Kumar.

13.

It has been held in the case of Kurukshetra University Vs. Priti Singh (2018) Lab.IC 1437 and Kanga Co-

operative Bank vs Seema Sharma (2018) LLR 231 that examination of the Enquiry Officer or any other employee who

is familiar with the enquiry proceedings is essential so as to prove the allegations of misconduct against the employee.

If the Enquiry Officer or any other employee has not been examined as a witness to prove the enquiry proceedings, the

enquiry proceedings in that eventuality are liable to be set aside. In the above case, management has in fact examined

the Presenting Officer who was not considered to be an independent witness and his evidence was held to be in

violation of principles of natural justice. Situation in the case in hand is even worse. Management has not examined

any independent official or the Enquiry Officer or any other witness so as to prove the domestic enquiry conducted

against the claimant. In such a situation, this Tribunal is left with no choice except to set aside the domestic enquiry

conducted against the claimant. Net result of the above discussion is that the management has failed to prove the

misconduct contained in the charge sheet served on the claimant. It is held that the enquiry has not been conducted in a

fair manner and the same is held to be in violation of principles of natural justice.

14.

I have also gone through the written statement filed by the management in the above case. Management has not

reserved any right to adduce evidence on merits in case findings on the domestic enquiry goes against the management.

Admittedly, in the present case the claimant has expired on 17.03.2018 and no useful purpose would be served even if

permission is granted to the management to adduce evidence on the misconduct/charge sheet framed against the

claimant. It has been held by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Karnataka State Road Transport Vs.

Lakshmidevamma & Another (2001) 5 SCC 433 that when domestic enquiry has been conducted by the management

and the management relies upon the same, it is open to the Tribunal to treat validity of the domestic enquiry as

preliminary issue. Management is also entitled to adduce evidence before this Tribunal in case findings on the

preliminary enquiry ultimately goes against the management. However, such a right is to be reserved by the

management in its reply/pleadings and in case right has not been reserved in the reply filed by the management, in that

eventuality, request is to be made at the earliest possible opportunity to the Tribunal before conclusion of the

proceedings qua the domestic enquiry. Since in the present case when arguments were heard, neither any official of the

4346

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

management nor A/R for the management has appeared, which clearly shows the lackadaisical interest of the

management in conduct of the case. Accordingly, this Tribunal is of the view that the management cannot be given

the right to adduce evidence on merits. As discussed above, no application has been moved on behalf of the

management to adduce evidence and neither the authorized representative nor any official of the management has made

such a request till date. In the case on hand Issue No.2 pertains to the fact as to whether punishment awarded to the

claimant commensurate to his misconduct. To my mind, this issue now pales into insignificance inasmuch as this

Tribunal has held the enquiry to be unfair and against the principles of natural justice. Since the management has not

reserved its right to adduce its evidence on merits in case findings on preliminary goes against the management, in such

a situation, even otherwise, there is no question of granting opportunity to the management to further adduce evidence

on issue No.(2), which has become virtually redundant.

15.

As a sequel to my discussions herein above, it is held that the action of the management of State Bank of India

in imposing penalty of ‘removal from service’ vide order dated 17.08.2004 upon the claimant herein is held to be

illegal and against the provisions of the Act. As such, the said order of ‘Removal from Service’ is hereby set aside. It

is held that the claimant is entitled for all terminal benefits which would have accrued to him had he been alive and in

service. An award is accordingly passed. Let this award be sent to the appropriate Government, as required under

Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, for publication.

Dated : May 24, 2018

A. C. DOGRA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 20 twu] 2018

dk-vk- 981-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ

¯lxkjsuh dksfy;jht daiuh fyfeVsM ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 'kqf¼i=k ,ylh 94@2009) dks çdkf'kr djrh

gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 19-06-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&22013@01@2018&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º

jktsUæ flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 20th June, 2018

S.O. 981.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. Corrigendum LC 94/2009) of the Central Government Industrial

Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management

of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 19.06.2018.

[No. L-22013/01/2018-IR (CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT AT

HYDERABAD

Present : Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer

Dated : the 26th day of April, 2018

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L.C. No. 94/2009

Between :

Sri Ramchetti Srinivas,

S/o Rajamouli,

R/o 17-3-261/1, Dwarakanagar,

Godavarikhani,

Karimnagar District

…Petitioner

AND

The General Manager,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940

4347

Goleti-I incline, Bellampally,

Adilabad

…Respondent

Appearances :

For the Petitioner

:

M/s. P. Sudha & Venkatesh Dixit, Advocates

For the Respondent

:

Sri S.M. Subhani, Advocate

CORRIGENDUM

The award was passed on 14.12.2017 and was published in the official gazette vide notification File No.

L-22013/01/2018-IR(C-II)) dated 18.1.2018.

Due to oversight, the name of the Petitioner was wrongly typed as “Sri K. Narsinga Rao”

Instead of,

“Sri Ramchetti Srinivas” five times

at 2nd page-1st Para-1st Line; at 5th page-6.I para-3rd line;

at 8th page-9th para-4th line; at 8th page 10th para-2nd line and

at 9th page-1st para of the “ORDER”-3rd line

MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 20 twu] 2018

dk-vk- 982-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ

¯lxkjsuh dksfy;jht daiuh fyfeVsM ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k ,ylh 95@2008) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks

dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 19-06-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&22013@01@2018&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º

jktsUæ flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 20th June, 2018

S.O. 982.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. LC 95/2008) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s.

Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 19.06.2018.

[No. L-22013/01/2018-IR (CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT AT

HYDERABAD

Present : Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer

Dated : the 25th day of April, 2018

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L.C. No. 95/2008

Between :

Sri Chilukala Rajendra Prasad,

S/o Rayamallu,

C/o Smt. A. Sarojana,

Advocate, Flat No.G7,

Rajeshwari Gayatri Sadan,

Opp: Badruka Jr. College for Girls,

Kachiguda, Hyderabad

…Petitioner

4348

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

AND

1.

The General Manager,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

Mandamarri Area, Mandamarri,

Adilabad District

2.

The Dy. General Manager,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

MK-4 Incline, Mandamarri Area,

Mandamarri, Adilabad District

…Respondents

Appearances :

For the Petitioner

:

M/s. A. Sarojana & K. Vasudeva Reddy, Advocates

For the Respondent

:

M/s. P.A.V.V.S. Sarma & Vijaya Lakshmi Panguluri, Advocates

AWARD

Sri Chilukala Rajendra Prasad who worked as Badli Filler (who will be referred to as the workman) has filed

this petition under Sec. 2A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 against the Respondents M/s. Singareni Collieries

Company Ltd., seeking for declaring the proceeding No. MMR/PER/D/072/857 dated 7.2.2008 issued by Respondent

No.1 as illegal, arbitrary and to set aside the same consequently directing the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner

into service duly granting all the consequential benefits such as continuity of service, back wages and all other

attendant benefits etc., and such other reliefs as this court may deems fit.

2.

The averments made in the petition in brief are as follows:

The Petitioner was initially appointed as badli filler on 25.9.1990 and he was confirmed as Coal Filler in the

year 1996. He was regular to his duties till the year 2004. But during the year 2005 Petitioner met with a road

accident, due to which his collar bone and fingers fractured, and as such he could not able to work for 44 days during

the year 2005. While the matters stood thus, charge sheet dated 13.5.2006 was issued to the Petitioner by the

Respondents alleging that the Petitioner absented for duty during the year 2005, which amounts to misconduct under

company’s Standing Order No.25.25. Subsequently, one inquiry was conducted and during the time of the enquiry, the

Petitioner was not given any opportunity much less valid in nature to put forth his grievances. Basing on such lopsided

enquiry, the Enquiry Officer held the charges as proved and basing on the erroneous findings of the Enquiry Officer,

the Petitioner was dismissed from service vide order No. MMR/PER/D/072/857 dated 7.2.2008. It is stated that during

the course of the enquiry the Petitioner has categorically stated about his inability to perform his duties regularly

during the year 2005, was only on account of his ill-health. But without considering any of his submissions, the

Petitioner was dismissed from service. It is also stated that the action of the Respondents’ management in dismissing

the Petitioner from service is wholly illegal, arbitrary, violative of the principles of natural justice. The Petitioner has

rendered 18 years of continuous service in the Respondents’ management till his dismissal. The Petitioner approached

the Respondents to consider his case sympathetically, but the management did not pay any heed to it. Therefore, the

Petitioner was constrained to approach this Tribunal to declare the impugned order No. MMR/PER/D/072/857 dated

7.2.2008 issued by the Respondents is illegal and arbitrary and to set aside the same and consequently to direct the

Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner into service duly granting all other attendant benefits such as continuity of

service, back wages etc..

3.

The Respondents filed counter denying the averments made in the petition, with the averments in brief

which runs as follows:

In the counter the Respondents while admitting some of the factual aspects to be true, stated that the Petitioner

was appointed in the Respondents’ company on 25.9.1990 as a Badli Filler and subsequently he was regularized as

Coal filler with effect from 1.9.1995. He was dismissed from service on proved charges of absenteeism, after

conducting a detailed domestic enquiry duly following the principles of natural justice. The Petitioner has attended the

dates fixed for the enquiry and had fully participated in the enquiry. He was given full, fair and reasonable

opportunity to defend himself in the enquiry. The enquiry was conducted purely following the principles of natural

justice. It is stated that basing on the evidence adduced before the Enquiry Officer, the Enquiry Officer submitted his

report holding the charges levelled against the Petitioner was proved. A copy of the enquiry report and the enquiry

proceeding was sent to the Petitioner by way of show cause notice giving him an opportunity to make representation

against the findings of the enquiry report; since the charge levelled against the Petitioner is proved and it was serious

in nature, punishment warranted was dismissal from service. The Disciplinary Authority has gone through the enquiry

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940

4349

proceeding and his past record and found that there was no extenuating circumstances to take a lenient view and lastly,

the Respondents were constrained to dismiss the Petitioner from service. It is stated that in fact the Petitioner was

irregular to his duties and he did not improve his attendance even after issuing charge sheet to him, and after receiving

the show cause notice. It is further stated that the punishment imposed on the Petitioner is justified and legal and as

such the claim petition is liable to be dismissed in limini.

4.

Order passed holding the domestic enquiry conducted by the Respondents as legal and valid, on dated

15.3.2011.

5.

Both the parties have advanced their arguments U/s.11A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 in support of their

claim.

6.

In view of the above facts, the points for determination are:

I.

Whether the action of the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., in imposing the

punishment of dismissal from service to Sri Chilukala Rajendra Prasad is legal and justified?

II.

Whether the Petitioner is entitled for reinstatement into service?

III.

If not, to what other relief he is entitled?

7.

Point No.I: During the course of argument, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner

submitted that due to illness and family problems, the Petitioner could not be able to attend his duty sincerely. Even

in his show cause the Petitioner has mentioned the above facts but it has not been considered during the course of the

enquiry and on account of absenteeism capital punishment of dismissal from service was imposed on the Petitioner.

When the Petitioner has taken a stand that due to his illness, and other family problems he could not be able to attend

his duties regularly and remained absent, the authority should have considered his case while imposing capital

punishment. But the authority has not considered any of the submissions of the Petitioner, and has imposed capital

punishment to the Petitioner when several modes of punishment are enumerated in the company’s Standing Orders.

8.

On the other hand, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents submitted that when the

Petitioner was a chronic absentee and was found guilty of the charges levelled against him, the punishment imposed

by the Respondents’ company is legal and proper. When the Petitioner was not sincere in his duty and failed to

maintain minimum musters in a year he is not entitled to be reinstated into service.

9.

Admittedly, working in the Mines is hazardous and remaining absent is not unusual. In this case, due to ill

health because of accident and other family problems of the Petitioner, he could not be able to regular in his duty,

remained absent in his duties and a proceeding was initiated against him for his absenteeism followed by an enquiry.

In the enquiry, the charges levelled against the Petitioner were proved. For this, capital punishment was imposed.

After dismissal of service, the Petitioner has become jobless and unable to provide a square meal to his family

members. He has already realised his mistake and has taken shelter in the court at the age of 42 years, he is now aged

about 52 years and is searching ways and means to provide bread and butter to his family members. The Petitioner

being an able bodied and energetic man has already realised his mistake and is coming forward to the court at the age

of 50 years to work under the Respondents. In such a circumstances, atleast one chance should be given to him for his

reinstatement into service in order to save his family members. Admittedly several modes of punishment are

enumerated in company’s Standing Orders. The Petitioner is a first offender and has worked about 18 years under the

Respondents. While imposing capital punishment to his employees, the management should think of the condition of

the workers as well as his family members. In this case, the punishment imposed by the Respondents for dismissal of

service of the Petitioner is too harsh. Therefore, it can safely be stated that the action taken by the management in

imposing the punishment of dismissal from service to Sri Chilukala Rajendra Prasad is not legal and justified.

Thus, Point No.I is answered accordingly.

10.

Point Nos. II & III: In Point No.I, it has already been discussed that the punishment of dismissal from service

to Sri Chilukala Rajendra Prasad is not legal and justified. After dismissal of service as stated earlier, when the

Petitioner has already realised his mistake and has come to the court with a prayer for reinstatement into service he

should be given a chance to serve for his family members. After dismissal of service the Petitioner has become jobless

and he being the sole bread earner of his family, is unable to provide a square meal to his family members. In such a

circumstances atleast the Petitioner should be given a chance to maintain his livelihood and to work under the

Respondents’ management. But in this case, the Petitioner has not come to the court soon after his dismissal of service.

In the opinion of this Tribunal the Petitioner is not entitled to get all the relief as claimed in his claim petition. But he is

only entitled to be given a chance to work in the Respondents’ management.

4350

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Thus, Point Nos. II & III are answered accordingly.

ORDER

Proceeding No. MMR/PER/D/072/857 dated 7.2.2008 issued by Respondent No.1 is declared as illegal and is

hereby set aside. It is ordered that the workman Sri Chilukala Rajendra Prasad be taken into service as a fresh

employee i.e., Badli filler in Cat.I, on initial basic pay without back wages and continuity of service, subject to medical

fitness by the company Medical Board and the workman be kept under probation for a period of one year. The

management is also directed to take an undertaking of good behaviour from the workman at the time of his posting.

The Workman can not claim for his posting in the same place, where he was last employed. The workman

shall have to maintain either minimum mandatory 20 musters every month or 190 musters in a year and the

management shall have the right to review the work of the workman in every three months. In the event of any short

fall of attendance during the period of the three months, the service of the workman shall not be terminated and he

will be cautioned to improve his performance by issuing him a warning letter. However, in the event of any shortfall

of attendance during one year of service of the workman, he will be terminated from service without any further notice

and enquiry and in the event of completion of one year of probation satisfactorily, the workman is to continue in

service till the age of attaining superannuation. The management shall consider any forced absenteeism on account of

Mine accidents/ Natural disasters, taking treatment in the company’s hospital, as attendance. All other usual terms

and conditions of appointment will be applicable i.e., transfer, hours of work, day of rest, holidays etc.. to the workman

for appointment afresh.

Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.

Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant and corrected by me on this the 25th day of

April, 2018.

MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner

Witnesses examined for the Respondent

NIL

NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

ubZ fnYyh] 20 twu] 2018

dk-vk- 983-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ

¯lxkjsuh dksfy;jht daiuh fyfeVsM ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k ,ylh 85@2008) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks

dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 19-06-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&22013@01@2018&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º

jktsUæ flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 20th June, 2018

S.O. 983.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. LC 85/2008) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s.

Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 19.06.2018.

[No. L-22013/01/2018-IR (CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940

4351

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT AT

HYDERABAD

Present : Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer

Dated : the 25th day of April, 2018

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L.C. No. 85/2008

Between :

Sri Mukkera Gangaish,

S/o Laxmaiah,

C/o Smt. A. Sarojana,

Advocate, Flat No.G7,

Rajeshwari Gayatri Sadan,

Opp: Badruka Jr. College for Girls,

Kachiguda, Hyderabad

…Petitioner

AND

1.

The General Manager,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

Mandamarri Area, Mandamarri,

Adilabad District

2.

The Colliery Manager,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

Kalyanakhani No. 2 Incline, Kalyanakhani,

Adilabad District

…Respondents

Appearances :

For the Petitioner

:

M/s. A. Sarojana & K. Vasudeva Reddy, Advocates

For the Respondent

:

M/s. M.V. Hanumantha Rao, Advocate

AWARD

Sri Mukkera Gangaiah who worked as Badli Filler (who will be referred to as the workman) has filed this

petition under Sec. 2A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 against the Respondents M/s. Singareni Collieries

Company Ltd., seeking for declaring the proceeding No. MMR/KK2/G-035/525 dated 20.2.2003 issued by Respondent

No.2 as illegal, arbitrary and to set aside the same consequently directing the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner

into service duly granting all the consequential benefits such as continuity of service, back wages and all other

attendant benefits etc., and such other reliefs as this court may deems fit.

2.

The averments made in the petition in brief are as follows:

The Petitioner was initially appointed as badli filler in the year 1981 and he was promoted as Coal Filler in the

year 1982. He was regular to his duties till the year 1999. But during the year 2000, the Petitioner suffered with ill

health, as his son was kidnapped by unidentified persons, due to which the Petitioner scared and went on roaming in

search of his son. While the matters stood thus, charge sheet dated 5.8.2001 was issued to the Petitioner by the

Respondents alleging that the Petitioner absented for duty during the year 2000, which amounts to misconduct under

company’s Standing Order No.25.25. Subsequently, one inquiry was conducted and during the time of the enquiry,

the Petitioner was not given any opportunity much less valid in nature to put forth his grievances. Basing on such

lopsided enquiry, the Enquiry Officer held the charges as proved and basing on the erroneous findings of the Enquiry

Officer, the Petitioner was dismissed from service vide order No. MMR/KK2/G-035/525 dated 20.2.2003 . It is stated

that during the course of the enquiry the Petitioner has categorically stated about his inability to perform his duties

regularly during the year 2000, as it was only on account of his ill-health. But without considering any of his

submissions, the Petitioner was dismissed from service. It is also stated that the action of the Respondents’

management in dismissing the Petitioner from service is wholly illegal, arbitrary, violative of the principles of natural

justice. The Petitioner has rendered 21 years of continuous service in the Respondents’ management till his dismissal.

The Petitioner approached the Respondents to consider his case sympathetically, but the management did not pay any

4352

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

heed to it. Therefore, the Petitioner was constrained to approach this Tribunal to declare the impugned order No.

MMR/KK2/G-035/525 dated 20.2.2003 issued by the Respondents is illegal and arbitrary and to set aside the same and

consequently to direct the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner into service duly granting all other attendant benefits

such as continuity of service, back wages etc..

3.

The Respondents filed counter denying the averments made in the petition, with the averments in brief

which runs as follows:

In the counter the Respondents while admitting some of the factual aspects to be true, stated that the Petitioner

was appointed in the Respondents’ company on 22.3.1981 as a Badli Filler. He was dismissed from service on proved

charges of absenteeism, after conducting a detailed domestic enquiry duly following the principles of natural justice.

The Petitioner has attended the dates fixed for the enquiry and had fully participated in the enquiry. He was given

full, fair and reasonable opportunity to defend himself in the enquiry. The enquiry was conducted purely following the

principles of natural justice. It is stated that basing on the evidence adduced before the Enquiry Officer, the Enquiry

Officer submitted his report holding the charges levelled against the Petitioner was proved. A copy of the enquiry

report and the enquiry proceeding was sent to the Petitioner by way of show cause notice giving him an opportunity to

make representation against the findings of the enquiry report; since the charge levelled against the Petitioner is

proved and it was serious in nature, punishment warranted was dismissal from service. The Disciplinary Authority has

gone through the enquiry proceeding and his past record and found that there was no extenuating circumstances to take

a lenient view and lastly, the Respondents were constrained to dismiss the Petitioner from service. It is stated that in

fact the Petitioner was irregular to his duties and he did not improve his attendance even after issuing charge sheet to

him, and after receiving the show cause notice. It is further stated that the punishment imposed on the Petitioner is

justified and legal and as such the claim petition is liable to be dismissed in limini.

4.

In view of the memo filed by the Counsel for the Petitioner conceding the legality and validity of the domestic

enquiry conducted in the present case, the domestic enquiry conducted by the Respondents is held as legal and valid

vide order dated 23.7.2010.

5.

Both the parties have advanced their arguments U/s.11A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 in support of their

claim.

6.

In view of the above facts, the points for determination are:

I.

Whether the action of the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., in imposing the

punishment of dismissal from service to Sri Mukkera Gangaiah is legal and justified?

II.

Whether the Petitioner is entitled for reinstatement into service?

III.

If not, to what other relief he is entitled?

7.

Point No.I: During the course of argument, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner

submitted that due to illness and family problems, the Petitioner could not be able to attend his duty sincerely. Even in

his show cause the Petitioner has mentioned the above facts but it has not been considered during the course of the

enquiry and on account of absenteeism capital punishment of dismissal from service was imposed on the Petitioner.

When the Petitioner has taken a stand that due to his illness, and other family problems he could not be able to attend

his duties regularly and remained absent, the authority should have considered his case while imposing capital

punishment. But the authority has not considered any of the submissions of the Petitioner, and has imposed capital

punishment to the Petitioner when several modes of punishment are enumerated in the company’s Standing Orders.

8.

On the other hand, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents submitted that when the

Petitioner was a chronic absentee and was found guilty of the charges levelled against him, the punishment imposed

by the Respondents’ company is legal and proper. When the Petitioner was not sincere in his duty and failed to

maintain minimum musters in a year he is not entitled to be reinstated in service.

9.

Admittedly, working in the Mines is hazardous and remaining absent is not unusual. In this case, due to ill

health and other family problems of the Petitioner, he could not be able to be regular in his duty, the Petitioner has

remained absent in his duties and a proceeding was initiated against him for his absenteeism followed by an enquiry.

In the enquiry, the charges levelled against the Petitioner were proved. For this, capital punishment was imposed.

After dismissal of service, the Petitioner has become jobless and unable to provide a square meal to his family

members. He has already realised his mistake and has taken shelter in the court at the age of 40 years, he is now aged

about 50 years and is searching ways and means to provide bread and butter to his family members. The Petitioner

being an able bodied and energetic man has already realised his mistake and is coming forward to the court to work in

the mines at the age of 50 years. In such a circumstances, atleast one chance should be given to him for reinstatement

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940

4353

into service in order to save his family members. Admittedly several modes of punishment are enumerated in

company’s Standing Orders. The Petitioner is a first offender and has worked 21 years under the Respondents. While

imposing capital punishment to his employees, the management should think of the condition of the workers as well

as his family members. In this case, the punishment imposed by the Respondents for dismissal of service is too harsh.

Therefore, it can safely be stated that the action taken by the management in imposing the punishment of dismissal

from service to Sri Mukkera Gangaiah is not legal and justified.

Thus, Point No.I is answered accordingly.

10.

Point Nos. II & III: In Point No.I, it has already been discussed that the punishment of dismissal from service

to Sri Mukkera Gangaiah is not legal and justified. After dismissal of service as stated earlier, when the Petitioner

has already realised his mistake and has come to the court with a prayer for reinstatement into service he should be

given a chance to serve for his family members. After dismissal of service the Petitioner has become jobless and he

being the sole bread earner of his family, is unable to provide a square meal to his family members. In such a

circumstances atleast the Petitioner should be given a chance to maintain his livelihood and to work under the

Respondents’ management. But in this case, the Petitioner has not come to the court soon after his dismissal of service.

In the opinion of this Tribunal the Petitioner is not entitled to get all the relief as claimed in his claim petition. But he is

only entitled to be given a chance to work in the Respondents’ management.

Thus, Point Nos. II & III are answered accordingly.

ORDER

Proceeding No. MMR/KK2/G-035/525 dated 20.2.2003 issued by Respondent No.1 is declared as illegal and is

hereby set aside. It is ordered that the workman Sri Mukkera Gangaiah be taken into service as a fresh employee i.e.,

Badli filler in Cat.I, on initial basic pay without back wages and continuity of service, subject to medical fitness by the

company Medical Board and the workman be kept under probation for a period of one year. The management is also

directed to take an undertaking of good behaviour from the workman at the time of his posting.

The Workman can not claim for his posting in the same place, where he was last employed. The workman

shall have to maintain either minimum mandatory 20 musters every month or 180 musters in a year and the

management shall have the right to review the work of the workman in every three months. In the event of any short

fall of attendance during the period of the three months, the service of the workman shall not be terminated and he

will be cautioned to improve his performance by issuing him a warning letter. However, in the event of any shortfall

of attendance during one year of service of the workman, he will be terminated from service without any further notice

and enquiry and in the event of completion of one year of probation satisfactorily, the workman is to continue in

service till the age of attaining superannuation. The management shall consider any forced absenteeism on account of

Mine accidents/ Natural disasters, taking treatment in the company’s hospital, as attendance. All other usual terms

and conditions of appointment will be applicable i.e., transfer, hours of work, day of rest, holidays etc.. to the workman

for appointment afresh.

Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.

Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant and corrected by me on this the 25th day of

April, 2018.

MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner

Witnesses examined for the Respondent

NIL

NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

4354

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ubZ fnYyh] 20 twu] 2018

dk-vk- 984-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ

¯lxkjsuh dksfy;jht daiuh fyfeVsM ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k ,ylh 59@2007) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks

dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 19-06-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&22013@01@2018&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º

jktsUæ flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 20th June, 2018

S.O. 984.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. LC 59/2007) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s.

Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 19.06.2018.

[No. L-22013/01/2018-IR (CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT AT

HYDERABAD

Present : Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer

Dated : the 26th day of April, 2018

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L.C. No. 59/2007

Between :

Sri Md. Abdul Kareem,

S/o Md. Ismail,

C/o Smt. A. Sarojana,

Advocate, Flat No.G7,

Ground Floor, Rajeshwari Gayatri Sadan,

Opp: Badruka Jr. College for Girls,

Kachiguda, Hyderabad

…Petitioner

AND

1.

The General Manager,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

RG-I Area, Godavarikhani,

Karimnagar District

2.

The Superintendent of Mines,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

GDK-5A Incline, Godavarikhani,

Karimnagar District

…Respondents

Appearances :

For the Petitioner

:

M/s. A. Sarojana & K. Vasudeva Reddy, Advocates

For the Respondent

:

M/s. P.A.V.V.S. Sarma & Vijaya Lakshmi Panguluri, Advocates

AWARD

Sri Md. Abdul Kareem who worked Badli Filler (who will be referred to as the workman) has filed this petition

under Sec. 2A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 against the Respondent M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

seeking to declare proceeding dated 16.1.1995 issued by the Respondents as illegal, arbitrary and to set aside the same

consequently directing the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner into service duly granting all the consequential

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940

4355

benefits such as continuity of service, back wages and all other attendant benefits etc., and such other reliefs as this

court may deems fit.

2.

The averments made in the petition in brief are as follows:

The Petitioner was initially joined the services of the Respondents’ company on 28/29.9.1994 under

compassionate grounds by the 1st Respondent and was instructed to report before the 2nd Respondent. Accordingly, the

Petitioner reported before the 2nd Respondent and performed his duties to the best of his ability. However, all on a

sudden, without issuing any notice or without affording any opportunity of being heard the Petitioner was dismissed

from service by the 2nd Respondent vide order dated 16.1.1995. It is also stated that the action of the Respondents’

management in dismissing the Petitioner from service is wholly illegal, arbitrary, and violative of the principles of

natural justice. The Petitioner approached the Respondents to consider his case sympathetically, but the managements

did not pay any heed to it. Therefore, the Petitioner was constrained to approach this Tribunal to declare the impugned

order dated 16.1.1995 issued by the Respondents as illegal and arbitrary and to set aside the same and consequently to

direct the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner into service duly granting all other attendant benefits such as

continuity of service, back wages etc..

3.

The Respondents filed counter denying the averments made in the petition, with the averments in brief

which runs as follows:

In the counter the Respondents while admitting some of the factual aspects to be true, stated that the Petitioner

was appointed in the Respondents’ company on 28/29.9.1994 as a dependant of his father Sri Md. Ismail, Ex-M & R

mazdoor, Auto workshop, Bellampalli Area who retired under Voluntary Retirement Scheme on health grounds.

Accordingly, the Petitioner reported on 3.10.1994 with the relevant terms and conditions of appointment order which

runs as follows:

“Accordingly, you are hereby appointed as Badli Filler on piece rated wages against absenteeism

vacancies of Fillers at Gdk No.5A Incline with immediate effect. You will be shown work as and when available

at Gdk No.5A Incline. This does not confer any right on job in the company. You have to attend to Gdk No.5A

Incline daily to find out work in place of permanent fillers who are temporarily absent.

In case your work, attendance and conduct are found to be unsatisfactory, your services are liable for

termination.”

The Petitioner had reported for duty on 3.10.1994 and worked only nine days during the period 3.10.1994 to

31.12.1994. His work and attendance were very poor. Hence, as per terms and conditions of the appointment order he

was terminated from the services of the Respondents’ company vide order No.Gdk/5A/95/2R/133 dated 16.1.1995. It

is further stated that the punishment imposed on the Petitioner is justified and legal and as such the claim petition is

liable to be dismissed in limini.

4.

Either the Petitioner or the Respondent have not adduced evidence.

5.

I have already heard from the parties in this matter.

6.

In view of the above facts, the points for determination are:

I.

Whether the action of the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., in imposing the

punishment of dismissal from service to Sri Md. Abdul Kareem is legal and justified?

II.

Whether the Petitioner is entitled for reinstatement into service?

III.

If not, to what other relief he is entitled?

7.

Point No.I: The Advocate for the Petitioner submitted that the Petitioner was initially joined in the service of

the Respondent company on 28/29.9.1994 under compassionate grounds by 1st Respondent and was instructed to report

before the 2nd Respondent. Accordingly, the Petitioner reported before the 2nd Respondent and performed his duties

there. He also submitted that the Petitioner performed his duties to the best of his ability. But, all on a sudden,

without issuing any notice or without affording any opportunity of being heard the Petitioner was dismissed from

service by the 2nd Respondent vide order dated 16.1.1995. He also contended that the dismissal of the Petitioner from

service is wholly illegal, arbitrary, and violative of the principles of natural justice. The Petitioner approached the

Respondents to consider his case sympathetically but the Respondents’ management did not pay any heed to it.

Therefore, the Petitioner was constrained to approach this Tribunal to declare the impugned order dated 16.1.1995

issued by the Respondents is as illegal, arbitrary and to set aside the same.

8.

On the other hand, the advocate for the Respondent while reiterating the contentions raised in the counter

argued that the Petitioner was appointed in the Respondents’ company on 28/29.9.1994 as a dependant employee of his

father Sri Md. Ismail, Ex-M & R mazdoor, Auto workshop, Bellampalli Area who retired under Voluntary Retirement

4356

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Scheme on health grounds. Accordingly, the Petitioner reported on 3.10.1994 with the following relevant terms and

conditions of appointment order, “you are hereby appointed as Badli Filler on piece rated wages against

absenteeism vacancies of Fillers at Gdk No.5A Incline with immediate effect. You will be shown work as and

when available at Gdk No.5A Incline. This does not confer any right on job in the company. You have to

attend to Gdk No.5A Incline daily to find out work in place of permanent fillers who are temporarily absent. In

case your work, attendance and conduct are found to be unsatisfactory, your services are liable for

termination.” He further argued that in view of the above conditional order of appointment, the Petitioner had

reported for duty on 3.10.1994 and worked only nine days during the period from 3.10.1994 to 31.12.1994. The work

and attendance of the Petitioner were very poor. Hence, as per the terms and conditions of the appointment order the

Petitioner was terminated from services of the Respondents’ company vide order No.Gdk/5A/95/2R/133 dated

16.1.1995. He also contended that the punishment imposed on the Petitioner is justified and legal and needs no

interference.

9.

On consideration of the rival contentions of both the sides it is noticed that the Petitioner has no where stated

how many days he worked in the office of the Respondents’ management. He has only mentioned that he performed

his duties to the best of his ability. It is not known how he justified his work that he performed his duty to the best of

his ability. When the Respondents’ have clearly stated that during the period from 3.10.1994 to 31.12.1994, the

Petitioner has only worked for 9 days it means in between 3 months, the Petitioner has only worked for 9 days. Further

no where the Petitioner has stated that during the above period, he was not assigned any duty to perform. If the

Petitioner has worked for only 9 days within a period of three months how he justified himself that he has performed

his duties to the best of his ability and to the satisfaction of his authority. In fact another aspect needs to be noted. The

Petitioner was a young man and a new entry to the Respondents’ organization. Regard being heard to his age and

experience in the work place, it was expected of him to maintain discipline act with responsibility, perform his duty

with sincerity and serve the institution with honesty. This kind of conduct can not be countenanced as it creates a

concavity in the work culture and ushers in indiscipline in an organization. The Petitioner has been given appointment

with a conditional order i.e., in case his work, attendance and conduct are found to be unsatisfactory, his services are

liable for termination. In the instant case when the Petitioner has worked only for 9 days within a period of three

months, it is obvious to say that the work of the Petitioner was not satisfactory and he has been rightly terminated from

services. If such type of workmen will be allowed to work in an organization, it management can not be flourished. In

such a circumstances, it can safely be held that the management has rightly passed the order for the termination of the

Petitioner. Thus, the action of the management is justified in imposing the punishment of dismissal from service to Sri

Md. Abdul Kareem.

Thus, Point No.I is answered accordingly.

10.

Point Nos. II & III: In Point No.I it has already been stated that the action of the management of M/s.

Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., in imposing the punishment of dismissal from service to Sri Md. Abdul Kareem is

legal and justified. In view of the above findings, the Petitioner is not entitled for reinstatement into service and also

not entitled for any other relief.

Thus, Point Nos. II & III are answered accordingly.

ORDER

The action of the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., in imposing the punishment of

dismissal from service to Sri Md. Abdul Kareem is legal and justified. Hence, the Petitioner workman is not entitled to

any relief as prayed for.

Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.

Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant and corrected by me on this the 26th day of

April, 2018.

MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner

Witnesses examined for the Respondent

NIL

NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940

4357

ubZ fnYyh] 20 twu] 2018

dk-vk- 985-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ

¯lxkjsuh dksfy;jht daiuh fyfeVsM ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k ,ylh 45@2008) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks

dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 19-06-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&22013@01@2018&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º

jktsUæ flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 20th June, 2018

S.O. 985.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. LC 45/2008) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s.

Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 19.06.2018.

[No. L-22013/01/2018-IR (CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT AT

HYDERABAD

Present : Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer

Dated : the 25th day of April, 2018

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L.C. No. 45/2008

Between :

Sri Parvatha Srinivas,

S/o Parvatha Lingaiah,

C/o Smt. A. Sarojana,

Advocate, Flat No.G7,

Rajeshwari Gayatri Sadan,

Opp: Badruka Jr. College for Girls,

Kachiguda, Hyderabad

…Petitioner

AND

1.

The General Manager,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

Bellampally Area, Bellampally, Adilabad District

2.

The Superintendent of Mines,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

Goleti No.1 Incline, Bellampally Area,

Bellampally, Adilabad District

…Respondents

Appearances :

For the Petitioner

:

M/s. A. Sarojana & K. Vasudeva Reddy, Advocates

For the Respondent

:

Sri M.V. Hanumantha Rao, Advocate

AWARD

Sri Parvatha Srinivas who worked as Badli Filler (who will be referred to as the workman) has filed this

petition under Sec. 2A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 against the Respondents M/s. Singareni Collieries

Company Ltd., seeking for declaring the proceeding No. BPA/PER/129/3585 dated 25.12.2007 issued by Respondent

No.1 as illegal, arbitrary and to set aside the same consequently directing the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner

into service duly granting all the consequential benefits such as continuity of service, back wages and all other

attendant benefits etc., and such other reliefs as this court may deems fit.

4358

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2.

The averments made in the petition in brief are as follows:

The Petitioner was initially appointed as badli filler in the year 2005. During the year 2006 the Petitioner and

his family members fell sick due to Chiken Guniya, Knee Pains and other family problems. While the matters stood

thus, charge sheet dated 12.1.2007 was issued to the Petitioner by the Respondents alleging that the Petitioner absented

for duty during the year 2006, which amounts to misconduct under company’s Standing Order No.25.25. The Petitioner

submitted his explanation to the charge sheet. Subsequently, one inquiry was conducted and during the time of the

enquiry, the Petitioner was not given any opportunity much less valid in nature to put forth his grievances. Basing on

such lopsided enquiry, the Enquiry Officer held the charges as proved and basing on the erroneous findings of the

Enquiry Officer, the Petitioner was dismissed from service vide order No. BPA/PER/129/3585 dated 25.12.2007. It is

stated that during the course of the enquiry the Petitioner has categorically stated about his inability to perform his

duties regularly during the year 2006, as it was only on account of his ill-health. But without considering any of his

submissions, the Petitioner was dismissed from service. It is also stated that the action of the Respondents management

in dismissing the Petitioner from service is wholly illegal, arbitrary, violative of the principles of natural justice. The

Petitioner has rendered 1½ years continuous service in the Respondents’ management till the date of his dismissal.

The Petitioner approached the Respondents to consider his case sympathetically, but the management did not pay any

heed to it. Therefore, the Petitioner was constrained to approach this Tribunal to declare the impugned order No.

BPA/PER/129/3585 dated 25.12.2007 issued by the Respondents is illegal and arbitrary and to set aside the same and

consequently to direct the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner into service duly granting all other attendant benefits

such as continuity of service, back wages etc..

3.

The Respondents filed counter denying the averments made in the petition, with the averments in brief

which runs as follows:

In the counter the Respondents while admitting some of the factual aspects to be true, stated that the Petitioner

was appointed in the Respondents’ company on 18.10.2005 as a Badli Filler. He was dismissed from service on

proved charges of absenteeism, after conducting a detailed domestic enquiry duly following the principles of natural

justice. The Petitioner has attended the dates fixed for the enquiry and had fully participated in the enquiry. He was

given full, fair and reasonable opportunity to defend himself in the enquiry. The enquiry was conducted purely

following the principles of natural justice. It is stated that basing on the evidence adduced before the Enquiry Officer,

the Enquiry Officer submitted his report holding the charges levelled against the Petitioner was proved. A copy of the

enquiry report and the enquiry proceeding was sent to the Petitioner by way of show cause notice giving him an

opportunity to make representation against the findings of the enquiry report; since the charge levelled against the

Petitioner is proved and it was serious in nature, punishment warranted was dismissal from service. The Disciplinary

Authority has gone through the enquiry proceeding and his past record and found that there was no extenuating

circumstances to take a lenient view and lastly, the Respondents were constrained to dismiss the Petitioner from

service. It is stated that in fact the Petitioner was irregular to his duties and he did not improve his attendance even

after issuing charge sheet to him, and after receiving the show cause notice. It is further stated that the punishment

imposed on the Petitioner is justified and legal and as such the claim petition is liable to be dismissed in limini.

4.

In view of the memo filed by the Counsel for the Petitioner conceding the legality and validity of the domestic

enquiry conducted in the present case, the domestic enquiry conducted by the Respondents is held as legal and valid

vide order dated 8.9.2010.

5.

Both the parties have advanced their arguments U/s.11A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 in support of their

claim.

6.

In view of the above facts, the points for determination are:

I.

Whether the action of the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., in imposing the

punishment of dismissal from service to Sri Parvatha Srinivas is legal and justified?

II.

Whether the Petitioner is entitled for reinstatement into service?

III.

If not, to what other relief he is entitled?

7.

Point No.I: During the course of argument, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner

submitted that due to illness and family problems, the Petitioner could not be able to attend his duty sincerely. Even in

his show cause the Petitioner has mentioned the above facts but it has not been considered during the course of the

enquiry and on account of absenteeism capital punishment of dismissal from service was imposed on the Petitioner.

When the Petitioner has taken a stand that due to his illness, and other family problems he could not be able to attend

his duties regularly and remained absent, the authority should have considered his case while imposing capital

punishment. But the authority has not considered any of the submissions of the Petitioner, and has imposed capital

punishment to the Petitioner when several modes of punishment are enumerated in the company’s Standing Orders.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940

4359

8.

On the other hand, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents submitted that when the

Petitioner was a chronic absentee and was found guilty of the charges levelled against him, the punishment imposed

by the Respondents’ company is legal and proper. When the Petitioner was not sincere in his duty and failed to

maintain minimum musters in a year he is not entitled to be reinstated in service.

9.

Admittedly, working in the Mines is hazardous and remaining absent is not unusual. In this case, due to ill

health and other family problems of the Petitioner, he could not be able to regular in his duty, remained absent in his

duties and a proceeding was initiated against him for his absenteeism followed by an enquiry. In the enquiry, the

charges levelled against the Petitioner were proved. For this, capital punishment was imposed on the Petitioner. After

dismissal of service, the Petitioner has become jobless and unable to provide a square meal to his family members. He

has already realised his mistake and has taken shelter in the court at the age of 25 years, he is now aged about 35 years

and is searching ways and means to provide bread and butter to his family members. The Petitioner being an able

bodied and energetic man has already realised his mistake and is coming forward to the court at the age of 25 years to

work under the Respondents. In such a circumstances, atleast one chance should be given to him for reinstatement

into service in order to save his family members. Admittedly several modes of punishment are enumerated in

company’s Standing Orders. The Petitioner is a first offender and has worked under the Respondents. While imposing

capital punishment to his employees, the management should think of the condition of the workers as well as his

family members. In this case, the punishment imposed by the Respondents for dismissal of service is too harsh.

Therefore, it can safely be stated that the action taken by the management in imposing the punishment of dismissal

from service to Sri Parvatha Srinivas is not legal and justified.

Thus, Point No.I is answered accordingly.

10.

Point Nos. II & III: In Point No.I, it has already been discussed that the punishment of dismissal from service

to Sri Parvatha Srinivas is not legal and justified. After dismissal of service as stated earlier, when the Petitioner has

already realised his mistake and has come to the court with a prayer for reinstatement into service he should be given a

chance to serve for his family members. After dismissal of service the Petitioner has become jobless and he being the

sole bread earner of his family, is unable to provide a square meal to his family members. In such a circumstances

atleast the Petitioner should be given a chance to maintain his livelihood and to work under the Respondents’

management. But in this case, the Petitioner has not come to the court soon after his dismissal of service. In the

opinion of this Tribunal the Petitioner is not entitled to get all the relief as claimed in his claim petition. But he is only

entitled to be given a chance to work in the Respondents’ management.

Thus, Point Nos. II & III are answered accordingly.

ORDER

Proceeding No. BPA/PER/129/3585 dated 25.12.2007 issued by Respondent No.1 is declared as illegal and is

hereby set aside. It is ordered that the workman Sri Parvatha Srinivas be taken into service as a fresh employee i.e.,

Badli filler in Cat.I, on initial basic pay without back wages and continuity of service, subject to medical fitness by the

company Medical Board and the workman be kept under probation for a period of one year. The management is also

directed to take an undertaking of good behaviour from the workman at the time of his posting.

The Workman can not claim for his posting in the same place, where he was last employed. The workman

shall have to maintain either minimum mandatory 20 musters every month or 190 musters in a year and the

management shall have the right to review the work of the workman in every three months. In the event of any short

fall of attendance during the period of the three months, the service of the workman shall not be terminated and he

will be cautioned to improve his performance by issuing him a warning letter. However, in the event of any shortfall

of attendance during one year of service of the workman, he will be terminated from service without any further notice

and enquiry and in the event of completion of one year of probation satisfactorily, the workman is to continue in

service till the age of attaining superannuation. The management shall consider any forced absenteeism on account of

Mine accidents/ Natural disasters, taking treatment in the company’s hospital, as attendance. All other usual terms and

conditions of appointment will be applicable i.e., transfer, hours of work, day of rest, holidays etc.. to the workman for

appointment afresh.

Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.

Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant and corrected by me on this the 25th day of

April, 2018.

MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer

4360

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner

Witnesses examined for the Respondent

NIL

NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

ubZ fnYyh] 20 twu] 2018

dk-vk- 986-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ bZ-lh-

,y- ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vfèkdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k ,ylh 18@2008) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

19-06-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&22012@255@2007&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º

jktsUæ flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 20th June, 2018

S.O. 986.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Corrigendum Award (Ref. No. 18/2008) of the Central Government Industrial

Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of

M/s. E.C.L. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 19.06.2018.

[No. L-22012/255/2007-IR (CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT,

ASANSOL

PRESENT : Shri Pramod Kumar Mishra, Presiding Officer

REFERENCE NO. 18 OF 2008

PARTIES :

The management of Dabour Colliery of M/s. ECL

v/s

Shri Naresh Tiwary

REPRESENTATIVES :

For the Management :

Shri P. K. Das, Learned Advocate

For the Union (Workmen) :

Shri Gaya Prasad Mal, Learned Union Representative

Industry : Coal

State : West Bengal

DATED : 04.06.2018

AWARD

In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-section(1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947), Govt. of India through the Ministry of Labour vide its letter NO. L-22012/

255/2007-IR(CM-II) dated 12.05.2008 has been pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by this

Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

“Whether the demand of Koyala Mazdoor Congress, Asansol for rectification of date of birth of Sri Naresh

Tiwari, Clerk is legal and justified? To what relief is the workman concerned entitled? ”

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % twu 23] 2018@vk"kk<+ 2] 1940

4361

1.

Having received the Order NO. L-22012/255/2007-IR(CM-II) dated 12.05.2008 of the above said reference

from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a Reference Case No. 18 of

2008 was registered on 22.05.2008. Accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through the

registered post to the parties concerned, directing them to appear in the court, on the date fixed and to file their written

statements along with the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance of the said

order notices by the registered post were sent to the parties concerned. Both the parties appeared in the Tribunal,

through their representatives.

2.

The workman has alleged in his written statement that he joined Dabor (R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields

Limited on 29.01.1973. His age was recorded as 24 (Twenty Four) years in 1973. Though his appointment was made

on the basis of his Matriculation Certificate in which his date of birth was recorded as 05.08.1950. The workman

Shri Naresh Tiwary inadvertently signed the B-Form of the colliery without pursuing the wrong entry regarding his

date of birth. The workman raised his objection before the management as soon as he came to know about the wrong

entry of his date of birth as recorded in C.M.P.F. records. The management accepted the claim of the workman and

constituted a committee to examine the case of the workman, Shri Naresh Tiwary. The said committee submitted its

report in favour of the workman, Shri Naresh Tiwary. A Note Sheet No. C-6/120/P-480 dated 01.03.2006 was initiated

by the colliery management for taking necessary approval to correct the date of birth of the workman as per

Matriculation Certificate. But the matter was kept pending for a long period and the workman was forced to

superannuate prematurely. The workman has prayed that the Tribunal may kindly direct the management of Dabor (R)

Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited to rectify the workman’s date of birth in company’s record and to pay his

wages and other consequential benefits for the period arising out of his premature superannuation.

3.

The Agent of Dabor (R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has alleged in his written statement that

demand of the union for rectification of date of birth of the workman Shri Naresh Tiwary is not justified. It appears

form record that Shri Naresh Tiwary joined the service on 29.1.1973. In statutory Form ‘B’ of the colliery his age is

recorded as 24 (Twenty Four) years as on 1973. Shri Naresh Tiwary after perusing the entry affixed his signature. In

the year 1987 a service excerpt was issued to him quoting almost all the dates including the age entered in the records,

seeking comments. But Shri Naresh Tiwary did not make any objection in respect of his age. The workman Shri Naresh

Tiwary got ample opportunity during his long span of service to get correction of age. But he remained silent for period

of over 3 (Three) decades. The dispute is of Civil nature and not an Industrial Dispute. The demand of the union -

Koyala Mazdoor Congress, Asansol for rectification of age of Shri Naresh Tiwary cannot be considered.

4.

The workman has filed the following documentary evidence :-

(i) Photocopy of the Matriculation Certificate, (ii) Photocopy of the Mark Sheet of Matriculation Examination,

(iii) Photocopy of the Admission Card for the Matriculation Examination, Photocopy of Identity Card of the workman

issued by the Colliery, (iv) Photocopy of the document from CMPF dated 05.01.1993, (v) Photocopy of the Character

Certificate from High School, (vi) Photocopy of the observation report of the committee member, (vii) Photocopy of

the I. I. No. 76 of the Joint Bipartite Committee for the Coal Industry.

The workman Shri Naresh Tiwary has filed affidavit in his oral evidence. He has been cross-examined by the

learned advocate of the management of Dabor (R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited

The management of Dabor (R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has not filed any documentary or

oral evidence.

5.

I have heard the arguments of Shri P. K. Das, learned advocate on behalf of the Dabor (R) Colliery of M/s.

Eastern Coalfields Limited and Shri Gaya Prasad Mal, learned advocate on behalf the workman Shri Naresh Tiwary.

6.

Shri P. K. Das, learned advocate on behalf of the Dabor (R) Colliery has argued that at the time of entry the age

of workman is recorded as 24 years as on 1973 in Form ‘B’ Register and other records. After long period of service at

the time of retirement he cannot raise the dispute for correction of his age. He is not entitled to any relief. On the other

hand Shri Gaya Prasad Mal, learned advocate of the workman Shri Naresh Tiwary has argued that at the time of entry

in service he has already passed Matriculation Examination. As per Matriculation Certificate his date of birth is

05.08.1950 but management wrongly recorded his date of birth. On his representation a committee was constituted by

the management. The committee recommended the correction of age as per Matriculation Certificate but the

management did not accept the recommendation of his own committee. His date of birth ought to have been corrected,

he has been prematurely retired which is illegal.

7.

The guide line regarding determination of the age at the time of appointment has been laid down in The Joint

Bipartite Committee for the Coal Industry No. CIL/WCWA-III/I.I.No.76/88/185 dated 25.04.199 which is as follows :-

4362

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 23, 2018/ASADHA 2, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

“ Matriculates: In the case of appointees who have passed Matriculation or equivalent examinations, the date

of birth recorded in the said certificates shall be treated as correct date of birth and the same will not be altered

under any circumstances.

Review / determination of date of birth in respect of existing employees : (a) In the case of the existing

employees Matriculation Certificate or Higher Secondary Certificate issued by the Recognised Universities or

Board or Middle Pass Certificate issued by the Board of Education and / or Department of the Public

Instruction and admit cards issued by the aforesaid Bodies should be treated as correct provided they were

issued by the said Universities / Boards / Institutions prior to the date of employment. ”

8.

The workman has filed copy of his Matriculation Certificate. As per Matriculation Certificate his date of birth is

05.08.1950. He has passed the high school in the year 1967. He has joined the service in the year 1973. Therefore it is

manifest that at the time of joining the service the concerned workman had already passed the Matriculation

Examination. Therefore ignoring the Matriculation Certificate and recording wrong date of birth is unjustified. The

committee constituted by the management of Dabor (R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has recommended

that :-

“As per ‘B’ Form Sl. No. 26 his age / dated of birth is 24 years as on 1973. The candidate produced original

Madhyamik Certificate certifying age / Date of Birth is 05.08.1950 issued by Bihar Bidyalaya Pariksha Samiti.

As per I. I. 76 the age recorded in S. R. Certificates is to be accepted so in this case his Date of Birth as per

School Certificates i.e. 05 August Nineteen Hundred Fifty may be accepted.”

9.

The workman has alleged in his oral evidence that he passed the Matriculation Examination in the year 1967.

He joined the Coal Company on 29.01.1973. He got recorded his date of birth in the original and statutory Form and

Register which is Exhibit- 2. His date of birth was correctly recorded as 05.08.1950 in the records of C.M.P.F. which is

Exhibit- 3. In the year 1987 the copy of service record was served on him. Entry of his date of birth was wrong. He

raised the objection regarding his incorrect date of birth. The management constituted the committee who submitted the

report in favour of the workman. The management initiated a Note Sheet being No.- C-6/RO/P480 dated 10.03.2006

for taking necessary approval for correction of date of birth.

10.

Form perusal of evidence of the workman it is apparent that he raised the dispute regarding incorrect date of

birth in the year 1987. But management did not pay any heed to the objection of the concerned workman. It is

surprising that in Identity Card issued by the management of Dabor (R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited

which is Annexure- B the date of birth of the workman Shri Naresh Tiwary is recorded as 05.08.1950.

11.

The management Dabor (R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited cannot deny the rightful claim of the

workman Shri Naresh Tiwary. The management has erroneously recorded wrong date of birth. The management of

Dabor (R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has not followed its own circular letter which laid down the

parameter for determining the age at the time of appointment. Even management of Dabor (R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern

Coalfields Limited has not implemented the report of committee which has been constituted by the management itself.

12.

In view of above discussion the demand of Koyala Mazdoor Congress for rectification of date of birth of Shri

Naresh Tiwary, Clerk is legal and justified. The workman Shri Naresh Tiwary is entitled for correction of date of birth

in company’s record as per his Matriculation Certificate i.e. 05.08.1950. The workman has been wrongly

superannuated. He is entitled for his wages and other consequential benefits arising out of his premature

superannuation.

O R D E R

Let an “Award” be and the same is passed as per above discussion. Send the copies of the order to the Govt. of

India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for information and needful. The reference is accordingly disposed of.

PRAMOD KUMAR MISHRA, Presiding Officer

Uploaded by Dte. of Printing at Government of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi-110064

and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi-110054. ALOK

KUMAR

Digitally signed by

ALOK KUMAR

Date: 2018.07.07

10:04:58 +05'30'