4731 GI/2018

(5199)

jftLVªh la- Mh- ,y- (,u) 04@0007@2003µ05

REGD. No. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05

izkf/dkj ls izdkf'kr

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

lkIrkfgd

WEEKLY

la- 33]

ubZ fnYyh] vxLr 19—vxLr 25] 2018] '[email protected] 28—Hkkæ 3] 1940

No. 33]

NEW DELHI, AUGUST 19—AUGUST 25, 2018, SATURDAY/SRAVANA 28—BHADRA 3, 1940

bl Hkkx esa fHkUu i`"B la[;k nh tkrh gS ftlls fd ;g i`Fkd ladyu ds :i esa j[kk tk lds

Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

Hkkx II—[k.M 3—mi&[k.M (ii)

PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)

Hkkjr ljdkj ds ea=kky;ksa (j{kk ea=kky; dks NksM+dj) }kjk tkjh fd, x, lkafof/d vkns'k vkSj vf/lwpuk,a

Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India

(Other than the Ministry of Defence)

fons'k ea=kky;

(lh-ih-oh- izHkkx)

ubZ fnYyh] 7 vxLr] 2018

dk-vk- 1251-—jktuf;d vkSj dksalqyh; vf/dkjh ('kiFk ,oa iQhl) ds vf/fu;e] 1948 (1948 dk 41) dh /kjk 2 ds

[akM (d) ds vuqlj.k esa oS/kfud vkns'k A

,rn~}kjk] dsaæ ljdkj Hkkjr ds iz/ku dksalykokl] etkj&,&'kjhiQ esa Jh dqychj ¯lg fpc] lgk;d vuqHkkx vf/dkjh dks

fnukad 7 vxLr] 2018 ls lgk;d dksalqyj vf/dkjh ds rkSj ij dksalqyj lsokvksa ds fuoZgu ds fy, izkfèkÑr djrh gS A

¹la- Vh&4330@01@2016º

izdk'k pUn] funs'kd (dksalqyj)

MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS

(C.P.V. DIVISION)

New Delhi, the 7th August, 2018

S.O. 1251.—In pursuance of clause (a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular Officers (Oaths and

Fees) Act, 1948 (41 of 1948), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Kulbir Singh Chib, Assistant Section Officer

5200

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 25, 2018/BHADRA 3, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

as Assistant Consular Officer in Consulate General of India, Mazar-e-Sharif to perform the Consular services with effect

from 7th August, 2018.

[No. T-4330/01/2016]

PRAKASH CHAND, Director (Consular)

ukxj foekuu ea=kky;

ubZ fnYyh] 8 vxLr] 2018

dk-vk- 1252-—dsaæh; ljdkj] jktHkk"kk (la?k ds 'kkldh; iz;kstuksa ds fy, iz;ksx) fu;e] 1976 ds fu;e 10 ds mifu;e

(4) ds vuqlj.k esa] Hkkjrh; foekuiÙku izkf/dj.k ds iz'kklfud fu;a=k.k ds v/hu foekuiÙku funs'kd dk dk;kZy;] Hkkjrh;

foekuiÙku izkf/dj.k] rstiqj gokbZ vM~Mk] rstiqj (vle) ftlds 80 izfr'kr dk£edksa us ¯gnh dk dk;Zlk/d Kku izkIr dj fy;k gS]

dks ,rn~}kjk vfèklwfpr djrh gS A

¹la- bZ&11014@9@2015&jk-Hkk-º

,l- ds- feJk] la;qDr lfpo

MINISTRY OF CIVIL AVIATION

New Delhi, the 8th August, 2018

S.O. 1252.—In pursuance of Sub-rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (Use for Official Purposes of the

Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government hereby notifies the Office of The Airport Director, Airports Authority of

India, Tezpur Airport, Tezpur (Assam), whereof 80% staff have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi.

[No. E-11014/9/2015-OL]

S. K. MISHRA, Jt. Secy.

ubZ fnYyh] 9 vxLr] 2018

dk-vk- 1253-—dsaæh; ljdkj] jktHkk"kk (la?k ds 'kkldh; iz;kstuksa ds fy, iz;ksx) fu;e] 1976 ds fu;e 10 ds mifu;e (4) ds

vuqlj.k esa] Hkkjrh; foekuiÙku izkf/dj.k ds iz'kklfud fu;a=k.k ds v/hu foekuiÙku funs'kd dk dk;kZy;] Hkkjrh; foekuiÙku izkf/dj.k]

fr:ifr gokbZ vM~Mk] fr:ifr (vka/z izns'k) ftlds 80 izfr'kr dk£edksa us ¯gnh dk dk;Zlk/d Kku izkIr dj fy;k gS] dks ,rn~}kjk vfèklwfpr

djrh gS A

¹la- bZ&11014@9@2015&jk-Hkk-º

,l- ds- feJk] la;qDr lfpo

New Delhi, the 9th August, 2018

S.O. 1253.—In pursuance of Sub-rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (Use for Official Purposes of the

Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government hereby notifies the Office of The Airport Director, Airports Authority of

India, Tirupati Airport, Tirupati (Andhra Pradesh), whereof 80% staff have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi.

[No. E-11014/9/2015-OL]

S. K. MISHRA, Jt. Secy.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 25] 2018@Hkkæ 3] 1940

5201

laLÑfr ea=kky;

ubZ fnYyh] 14 vxLr] 2018

dk-vk- 1254-—dsaæ ljdkj] jktHkk"kk (la?k ds 'kkldh; iz;kstuksa ds fy, iz;ksx) fu;e] 1976 ds fu;e 10 ds mifu;e (4) ds

vuqlj.k esa laLÑfr ea=kky; ds varxZr vkus okys dk;kZy;] {ks=kh; funs'kd dk dk;kZy; (nf{k.k)] Hkkjrh; iqjkrRo losZ{k.k] jktkthuxj

baMfLVª;y bLVsV] csaxyq#&560010 ftlesa 80 izfr'kr ls vf/d vf/dkfj;ksa@deZpkfj;ksa us ¯gnh dk dk;Zlk/d Kku izkIr dj fy;k gS] dks

vfèklwfpr djrh gS A

;g vf/lwpuk jkti=k esa izdk'ku dh rkjh[k ls izo`Ùk gksxh A

¹iQk- la- bZ&13016@1@2017&¯gnhº

iz.ko [kqYyj] la;qDr lfpo

MINISTRY OF CULTURE

New Delhi, the 14th August, 2018

S.O. 1254.—In pursuance of Sub-rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (Use for Official Purposes of the

Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government hereby notifies the Office of Regional Director (Southern Region),

Archaeological Survey of India, Industrial Estate, Rajajinagar, Bangalore-560010 under the Ministry of Culture wherein

more than 80% officers/staff have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi.

This notification shall come into force from the date of publication in the Official Gazette.

[F. No. E-13016/1/2017-Hindi]

PRANAV KHULLAR, Jt. Secy.

उपभोा मामले और सावजिनक िवतरण मंालय

(उपभोा मामले िवभाग

उपभोा मामले िवभाग

उपभोा मामले िवभाग)

(भारतीय मानक यूरो

भारतीय मानक यूरो

भारतीय मानक यूरो)

नई दली, 8 अगत, 2018

का

का.आ.

.आ.

.आ. 1255

1255

1255.—भारतीय मानक यूरो िनयम, 2018 के िनयम 31 के उपिनयम (1) के अनुसरण म, भारतीय मानक यूरो नीचे

अनुसूची म दए गए िनिलिखत बंघ प%ित माणन के िलए मानक मुहर त&संबंधी मानक( के अनुसार एतद् *ारा त&काल भाव से

अिधसूिचत करता है ।

अनुसूची

,म

सं-या

मानक मुहर का िडजाइन

बंघ प%ित क. कम

भारतीय मानक क. सं-या

क.

lM+d VªSfQd lqj{kk

¼vkj-Vh-,l-½ izcaèk

प%ितयां

आईएस/आईएसो 39001

[स/दभ0: एमएससीडी/2:1:3]

सी. बी. 1सह, अपर महािनदेशक, बीआईएस

5202

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 25, 2018/BHADRA 3, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

(Department of Consumer Affairs)

(BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS)

New Delhi, the 8th August, 2018

S.O. 1255.—In pursuance of sub-rule (1) of Rule 31 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules 2018, the Bureau of

Indian Standards hereby notifies the Standard Mark for the following Management Systems Certification in accordance

with the relevant Indian Standards as given in the schedule below with immediate effect.

SCHEDULE

No.

Design of Standard Mark

Type of Management

Systems

No. of Indian

Standards

Road Traffic Safety

Management Systems

IS/ISO 39001

[Ref. : MSCD/2:1:3]

C. B. SINGH, Addl. Director General, BIS

कोयला मंालय

नई दली, 23 अगत, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ. 1256

1256

1256.—के/5ीय सरकार, कोयला धारक 6े7 (अज0न और िवकास) अिधिनयम, 1957 (1957 का 20) क. धारा 3

*ारा दA शिCय( का योग करते Dए, नीचे दी गई अनुसूची के तEभ (2) म िविनFदG अिधकाHरय( को, उC अिधिनयम के योजन( के

िलए और उC अनुसूची के तEभ (3), यथा िविनFदG मेसस0 उAर देश राKय िवLुत उ&पादन िनगम िलिमटेड ( उAर देश सरकार का

उप,म), रिजटड0 मु-यालय 14 -अशोक माग0, शिC भवन िवतार, लखनऊ-226001 क. अिधकाHरता के भीतर आने वाले तEभ (5) म

िविनFदG 6े7( के संबंध म उC स6म ािधकाHरय( के सामने तEभ (4), म क. त&थानी िविG म यथािविनFदG ऐसी धाराS के िलए

स6म ािधकारी िनयुC करती है :-

अनुसूची

,म

सं-या

स6म ािधकारी के Uप म िनयुC

VिC का पदनाम

शासक.य पता

अिधिनयम क.

धारा

अिधकाHरता का 6े7

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

मु-य अिभयंता

अधी6ण अिभयंता

अिधशासी अिभयंता

सहायक अिभयंता

रिजWीकृत मु-यालय: उAर

देश राKय िवLुत उ&पादन

िनगम िलिमटेड, 14- अशोक

माग0,

शिC

भवन

िवतार,

लखनऊ-226001.

धारा 4 क. उप-

धारा (3)

(क)

पूवY6ण कोयला के िलए

भूिम

म

वेश

और

सवY6ण करना ;

(ख)

उप - मृदा म खोदना या

वेधन करना;

(ग)

भूिम

म

कोयला

के

पूवY6ण के िलए सभी

आवZयक

काय0

कए

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 25] 2018@Hkkæ 3] 1940

5203

काया0लय:

उAर

देश

राKय

िवLुत

उ&पादन िनगम िलिमटेड, 4 तल,

टी.सी. 46/वी, समाज कयाण

िब1डग, िवभूित खंड, गोमती

नगर, लखनऊ – 226010.

जाना;

(घ)

भूिम

क.

सीमाएं

िच/हांकत करना िजनम

पूवY6ण

के

िलए

तािवत कया जाना है;

(ङ)

ऐसी सीमाS और पंिC

को िच/हांकत करने के

िलए िच/ह( को लगाना;

(च)

जहां सवY6ण पूरा नह[

कया जा सकता है और

सीमाएं

तथा

पंिC

िच/हांकत कए गए ह\,

वहाँ कम कसी खड़ी

फसल, बाड़ या जंगल के

कसी भाग को कम और

साफ करना ।

मु-य अिभयंता

अधी6ण अिभयंता

अिधशासी अिभयंता

सहायक अिभयंता

रिजWीकृत मु-यालय: उAर

देश राKय िवLुत उ&पादन

िनगम िलिमटेड, 14- अशोक

माग0,

शिC

भवन

िवतार,

लखनऊ-226001.

काया0लय:

उAर

देश

राKय

िवLुत

उ&पादन िनगम िलिमटेड, 4 तल,

टी.सी. 46/वी, समाज कयाण

िब1डग, िवभूित खंड, गोमती

नगर, लखनऊ – 226010.

धारा 6

काHरत होने वाली संभाV 6ित

क. रकम पर ितकर का संदाय

और के/5ीय सरकार को िववाद

िनFदG करना ।

कोयला िनयं7क

कोयला िनयं7क का काया0लय, 1,

काउंिसल हाउस Wीट, कोलकाता

– 700001

धारा 8 क. उप-

धारा (2)

अज0न के िव`% आ6ेप( क.

सुनवाई और क5ीय सरकार को

Hरपोट0 तुत कया जाना ।

मु-य अिभयंता

अधी6ण अिभयंता

अिधशासी अिभयंता

सहायक अिभयंता

रिजWीकृत मु-यालय: उAर

देश राKय िवLुत उ&पादन

िनगम िलिमटेड, 14- अशोक

माग0,

शिC

भवन

िवतार,

लखनऊ-226001.

काया0लय:

उAर देश राKय िवधुत उ&पादन

िनगम िलिमटेड, 4 तल,

टी.सी. 46/वी, समाज कयाण

िब1डग, िवभूित खंड, गोमती

नगर, लखनऊ – 226010.

धारा 12

धारा 13 क. उप-

धारा (6)

धारा 14 क. उप-

धारा (1)

VिCय( को भूिम का कजा

अbयcपत करने और उसका

कजा लेने के िलए सूचना ।

नुकसानी के िलए ितकर का

संदाय िजसका अिधिनयम म

कह[ भी उपबंध नह[ कया गया

है।

करार *ारा िनयत ितकर का

संदाय ।

5204

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 25, 2018/BHADRA 3, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

[फा.सं. 43015/8/2018-एलए एdड आईआर]

राम िशरोमिण सरोज, अवर सिचव

MINISTRY OF COAL

New Delhi, the 23rd August, 2018

S.O. 1256.—In exercise of the powers conferred by section 3 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and

Development) Act, 1957 (20 of 1957), the Central Government hereby appoints the officers specified in column (2) of

the Schedule below to be competent authorities for the purposes of the said Act and for the provisions of such of the

sections as are specified against the said competent authorities in the corresponding entry in column (4) thereof, in

respect of the areas specified in column (5) falling within the jurisdiction of M/s Uttar Pradesh Rajya Vidyut Utpadan

Nigam Limited (A UP Government Undertaking), Regd. Head Office at 14-Ashok Marg, Shakti Bhawan Extn,

Lucknow - 226001 as specified in column (3) of the said Schedule.

धारा 14 क. उप-

धारा (4)

धारा 16

धारा 17

धारा 19

धारा 20 क. उप-

धारा (3)

धारा 21

ितकर के संबंध म अिधकरण के

सम6 कथन।

अिधकरण के अिधिनण0य पर

ितकर के याज का संदाय।

ितकर का संदाय ।

के/5ीय

सरकार

*ारा

&यायोिजत

शिCय(

और

कत0V( का पालन करना।

के/5ीय सरकार *ारा अपील क.

सुनवाई करके Hरपोट0 देना और

अपने आदेश का िनeकष0 देना ।

जानकारी ाg करने क. शिC ।

मु-य अिभयंता

2. अधी6ण अिभयंता

अिधशासी अिभयंता

सहायक अिभयंता

रिजWीकृत मु-यालय: उAर

देश राKय िवLुत उ&पादन

िनगम िलिमटेड, 14- अशोक

माग0,

शिC

भवन

िवतार,

लखनऊ-226001.

काया0लय:

उAर देश राKय िवLुत उ&पादन

िनगम िलिमटेड, 4 तल,

टी.सी. 46/वी, समाज कयाण

िब1डग, िवभूित खंड, गोमती

नगर, लखनऊ – 226010.

धारा 22

कसी भी संपित म वेश करने

और िनरी6ण करने क. शिC ।

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 25] 2018@Hkkæ 3] 1940

5205

SCHEDULE

Serial

Number

Designation of person

appointed as competent

authority.

Official address.

Section of

the Act.

Area of Jurisdiction.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

1. Chief Engineer

2. Superintending Engineer

3. Executive Engineer

4. Assistant Engineer

Registered

Head

Office:

Uttar Pradesh Rajya

Vidyut Utpadan Nigam

Limited,

Shakti

Bhawan

Extn,

14-

Ashok Marg, Lucknow

– 226001.

Office :

Uttar Pradesh Rajya

Vidyut Utpadan Nigam

Limited,4^th Floor TC

46/V, Samaj Kalyan

Building,

Vibhuti

Khand, Gomti Nagar,

Lucknow-226010.

Sub-section

(3) of

section 4.

(a) To enter upon and

survey the land for

prospecting coal;

(b) To dig or bore into the

sub- soil;

to prospect for coal in

the land;

(d) To set out boundaries

of the land in which

prospecting is proposed

to be done;

(e) To

mark

such

boundaries and line by

placing marks;

(f)

Where survey cannot

be completed and the

boundaries and the line

marked, to cut down

and clear away any part

of standing crop, fence

or jungle.

1. Chief Engineer

2. Superintending Engineer

3. Executive Engineer

4. Assistant Engineer

Registered

Head

Office:

Uttar Pradesh Rajya

Vidyut Utpadan Nigam

Limited,

Shakti

Bhawan

Extn,

14-

Ashok Marg, Lucknow

– 226001.

Office :

Uttar Pradesh Rajya

Vidyut Utpadan Nigam

Limited,4^th Floor TC

46/V, Samaj Kalyan

Building,

Vibhuti

Khand, Gomti Nagar,

Lucknow -226010.

Section 6.

Payment of compensation on

amount of damage likely to

be caused and referring

dispute

the

Central

Government.

Coal Controller

Office of the Coal

Controller, 1, Council

House Street, Kolkata-

700001.

Sub-section

(2) of

section 8.

Hearing

objections

against

acquisition

and

submitting of report to the

Central Government.

1. Chief Engineer

2. Superintending Engineer

3. Executive Engineer

4. Assistant Engineer

Registered

Head

Office:

Uttar Pradesh Rajya

Vidyut Utpadan Nigam

Limited,

Shakti

Bhawan

Extn,

14-

Ashok Marg, Lucknow

- 226001

Section 12

Sub-section

(6) of

section 13.

Notice

persons

surrender possession of land

and take possession thereof.

Payment of compensation

for damages not provided

elsewhere in the Act.

5206

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 25, 2018/BHADRA 3, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Office :

Uttar Pradesh Rajya

Vidyut Utpadan Nigam

Limited,4^th Floor TC

46/V, Samaj Kalyan

Building,

Vibhuti

Khand, Gomti Nagar,

Lucknow -226010.

Sub-section

(1) of

section 14.

Sub-section

(4) of

section 14.

Section 16

Section 17

Section 19

Sub-section

(3) of

section 20.

Section 21

Payment of compensation

fixed by agreement.

Statement

before

the

Tribunal

regarding

fair

amount of compensation.

Payment

interest

compensation awarded by

the Tribunal.

Payment of compensation.

To exercise the powers and

duties

delegated

the

Central Government.

Giving of report during

hearing of appeal by the

Central Government and the

finding of its order.

Power to obtain information.

1. Chief Engineer

2. Superintending Engineer

3. Executive Engineer

4. Assistant Engineer

Registered

Head

Office:

Uttar Pradesh Rajya

Vidyut Utpadan Nigam

Limited,

Shakti

Bhawan

Extn,

Ashok Marg, Lucknow

- 226001

Office :

Uttar Pradesh Rajya

Vidyut Utpadan Nigam

Limited,4^th Floor TC

46/V, Samaj Kalyan

Building,

Vibhuti

Khand, Gomti Nagar,

Lucknow -226010.

Section 22.

Power to enter and inspect

any property.

[F.No. 43015/8/2018-LA&IR]

RAM SHIROMANI SAROJ, Under Secy.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 25] 2018@Hkkæ 3] 1940

5207

संचार मंा

संचार मंालय

लय

(डाक िवभाग

डाक िवभाग

डाक िवभाग)

(पीबीआई िडवीजन)

नई द ली, 3 अग त, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ. 1257

1257

1257.— ‘’इंिडया पो ट पेमे/ iस ब\क क. थापना’’ क. पHरयोजना संबंधी काय0वृ& त दनांक 3 जून, 2016 के तहत

संसूिचत मंि7मंडल के अनुमोदन के अनुसरण म, के/ 5 सरकार एतjारा kी तनवीर कमर मोहE मद, उप महािनदेशक (पीबीआई), भारत

सरकार, डाक िवभाग को त& काल भाव से और अगले आदेश होने तक इंिडया पो ट पेमे/ iस ब\क के िनदेशक बोड0 के सरकारी नािमत

िनदेशक के Uप म मनोनीत करती है।

[फा.सं. 1-6/2016-पीबीआई (खd ड-III)]

अिभषेक जैन, सहायक महािनदेशक (पीबीआई)

Ministry of Communications

(Department of Posts)

(PBI DIVISION)

New Delhi, the 3rd August, 2018

S.O. 1257.—In pursuance of the approval of the Cabinet communicated vide minutes dated 3^rd June, 2016 for

the project of ‘’Setting up of India Post Payments Bank’’, the Central Government hereby nominates Shri. Tanweer

Qamar Mohammad, Deputy Director General (PBI), Government of India, Department of Posts, as Government

Nominee Director to the Board of Directors of India Post Payments Bank, with immediate effect and until further orders.

[F. No. 1-6/2016-PBI (Vol-III)]

ABHISHEK JAIN, Asst. Director General (PBI)

Je ,oa jkstxkj ea=kky;

ubZ fnYyh] 20 vxLr] 2018

dk-vk- 1258-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ bZLVuZ

dksyiQhYM fyfeVsM ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 01@2012) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

14-08-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&22012@165@2011&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º

jktsUæ flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

New Delhi, the 20th August, 2018

S.O. 1258.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 01/2012) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Asansol, as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. E.C.L., and their

workmen, received by the Central Government on 14.08.2018.

[No. L-22012/165/2011-IR (CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

5208

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 25, 2018/BHADRA 3, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL

PRESENT : Shri Pramod Kumar Mishra, Presiding Officer

REFERENCE NO. 01 OF 2012

PARTIES :

The management of 1 & 2 Incline, Jhanjra Area of M/s. ECL

v/s

Shri Arjit Mukherjee

REPRESENTATIVES :

For the Management

Shri P. K. Das, Learned Advocate

For the Union (Workman) :

None

Industry : Coal

State : West Bengal

Dated : 17.07.2018

AWARD

In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-section(1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947), Govt. of India through the Ministry of Labour vide its letter NO. L-

22012/165/2011–IR (CM-II) dated 19.12.2011 has been pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by this

Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of 1 & 2 Incline under Jhanjra Area of M/s. Eastern Coalfields

Limited, in dismissing Shri Arjit Mukherjee, Cat-I Mazdoor, U.M. No. 130991 from services w.e.f. 17.08.2006

is legal and justified? To what relief the workman concerned is entitled to? ”

Having received the Order NO. L-22012/165/2011–IR (CM-II) dated 19.12.2011 of the above said reference

from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a Reference Case No. 01 of 2012

was registered on 05.01.2012. Accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through the registered post

to the parties concerned, directing them to appear in the court, on the date fixed and to file their written statements along

with the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance of the said order notices by

the registered post were sent to the parties concerned. Both the parties appeared in the Tribunal, through their

representative.

Case called out. Shri P. K. Das, learned advocate of the management of 1 & 2 Incline under Jhanjra Area of

M/s. ECL appeared. But none appeared on behalf of the union / workman.

On perusal of the case record I find that neither the workman nor the union has ever appeared before the Tribunal

in spite of granting 17 (Seventeen) dates. Registered notices were issued to the union on 15.10.2014 and 23.11.2015 but

to no effect. It seems to me that the workman / union is not at all interested to contest this case further. As such the case

is closed and accordingly a ‘No Dispute Award’ is hereby passed.

O R D E R

Let an “Award” be and the same is passed as per above discussion. Send the copies of the order to the Govt. of

India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for information and needful. The reference is accordingly disposed of.

PRAMOD KUMAR MISHRA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 20 vxLr] 2018

dk-vk- 1259-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ bZLVuZ

dksyiQhYM fyfeVsM ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 03@2013) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

14-08-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&22012@123@2011&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º

jktsUæ flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 25] 2018@Hkkæ 3] 1940

5209

New Delhi, the 20th August, 2018

S.O. 1259.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 03/2013) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. E.C.L., and their

workmen, received by the Central Government on 14.08.2018.

[No. L-22012/123/2011-IR (CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL

PRESENT : Shri Pramod Kumar Mishra, Presiding Officer

REFERENCE NO. 03 OF 2013

PARTIES :

The Management of Khas Kajora Colliery of M/s. ECL

v/s

Shri Tulsi Bhuia

REPRESENTATIVES :

For the Management

Shri P. K. Das, Learned Advocate

For the Union (Workman) :

Shri Rakesh Kumar, Union Representative

Industry : Coal

State : West Bengal

Dated : 17.07.2018

AWARD

In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-section (1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947), Govt. of India through the Ministry of Labour vide its letter NO. L-

22012/123/2011–IR (CM-II) dated 19.09.2011 has been pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by this

Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

“ Whether the action of the management of Khas Kajora Colliery, Kajora Area of M/s. Eastern Coalfields

Limited, in dismissing Shri Tulsi Bhuia, Dresser, UM No. 553673 w.e.f. 16.07.2008 is legal and justified? To

what relief the workman concerned is entitled to? ”

Having received the Order NO. L-22012/123/2011–IR (CM-II) dated 19.09.2011 of the above said reference

from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a Reference Case No. 03 of 2013

was registered on 19.03.2013. Accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through the registered post

to the parties concerned, directing them to appear in the court, on the date fixed and to file their written statements along

with the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance of the said order notices by

the registered post were sent to the parties concerned. Both the parties appeared in the Tribunal, through their

representative.

Case called out. Shri P. K. Das, learned advocate appeared on behalf of the management of Khas Kajora Colliery

of M/s. ECL but has not filed his authorization till date. Shri Rakesh Kumar, learned union representative appeared on

behalf of the workman Shri Tulsi Bhuia.

On the basis of the application filed by the management on 17.09.2015 I have perused the Reference No. 18 of

2011 and came to the conclusion that the Schedule of both the References are same.

In Reference No. 18 of 2011, Shri Rakesh Kumar, learned union representative of the workman, Shri Tulsi Bhuia

insisted on passing a ‘No Dispute Award’ and an order regarding the same has been passed. Since both the cases belongs

to the same person and reliefs to be entitled are also equal, I find no reason to keep this reference pending without any

fruitful result. As such the case is closed and accordingly a ‘No Dispute Award’ is hereby passed.

O R D E R

Let an “Award” be and the same is passed as per above discussion. Send the copies of the order to the Govt. of

India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for information and needful. The reference is accordingly disposed of.

PRAMOD KUMAR MISHRA, Presiding Officer

5210

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 25, 2018/BHADRA 3, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ubZ fnYyh] 20 vxLr] 2018

dk-vk- 1260-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ uknuZ

dksyiQhYM fyfeVsM ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] dkuiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 05@2016) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

14-08-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&22012@98@2015&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º

jktsUæ flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 20th August, 2018

S.O. 1260.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 05/2016) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Kanpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. N.C.L., and their

workmen, received by the Central Government on 14.08.2018.

[No. L-22012/98/2015-IR (CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI SHUBHENDRA KUMAR, HJS, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOR COURT, KANPUR-208022

Industrial Dispute No. 05 of 2016

Between:-

Sh. Omkar Nath Yadav,

Bhartiya Koyla Khadan Mazdoor Sangh,

Dantopant Thengari Bhawan, NCL Khadia Project,

Khadia, Distt. Sonebhadra (U.P.),

SONEBHADRA (U.P.) - 231222

AND

The General Manager,

Northern Coalfields Limited,

Khadia Project, Khadia,

Distt. Sonebhadra(U.P.)

SONEBHADRA (U.P.)-231222

AWARD

Central Government, MOL, vide notification No. L-22012/98/2015-IR (CM-II) dated 22.01.2016 has referred the

following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication.

“Whether the action of the management of NCL, Khadia Project not to deduct subscription in favor of member of

Bhartiya Koyla Khadan Mazdoor Sangh is unfair labor practice and if management action is unfair labor practice

what relief the union is entitled to and from which date?’

Briefly stated facts of the union are Bhartiya Koyala Khadan Mazdoor Sanh Bina a registered trade Union under

Trade Union Act, 1926. Its branches are at different projects of Northern Coal Fields Ltd. such as Khadiya

Project, the name of Omakar Nath Yadav is president of Khadiya Project. It is further alleged that Bhartiya

Koyala Khadan Mazdoor Sangh is a recognized union in Khadiya project unit. All the decisions pertaining to

welfare of the employees are being decided constituting agency in which those unions are entitled to participate in

negotiations whose membership is up to the mark of 20% of total workers of the project. However, to maintain

participation in JCC 20% membership is necessary as per check of system. Bhartiya Koyala Khadan Mazdoor

Sangh is old union; therefore, 20% membership is required in the year 2014 to become eligible for joining JCC

and other Forums. It is pertinent to mention here that the management is duty bound to deduct annual subscription

of all the employees of the project from their salary and transfer the amount so deducted to the unions by cheque.

It is clarified that the management have not deducted subscription of 19 members of Bhartiya Koyala Khadan

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 25] 2018@Hkkæ 3] 1940

5211

Mazdoor Sangh Bina and the management have remitted only subscription of 241 members. Having aggrieved by

the decision of the management, the union has referred the matter to Asst. Labor Commissioner (Central)

Allahabad for his verification and decision. Accordingly Asst. Labor Commissioner (Central) Allahabad has

personally contracted employees our 19 members and asked to produce affidavit if they are members of Bhartiya

Koyala Khadan Mazdoor Sangh Bina Khadia Unit. Ten members were personally examined by ALC and seven

members have given their affidavit in favor of Bhartiya Koyala Khadan Mazdoor Sangh. Accordingly ALC found

that the following employees are members of Bhartiya Koyala Khadan Mazdoor Sangh. Two other members

namely Arun Kumar Clerk and Sri Rajesh Kumar Driver have already obtained receipt from the union but their

subscription has not yet been paid to Bhartiya Koyala Khadan Mazdoor Sangh Nina, as per Code of Conduct

Check of system No. 3 which is unfair labor practice of the management. It is therefore essential that the

subscription of all above 19 workers of Khadiaya Project may be deducted from their salary and remitted to

Bhartiaya Koyala Khadan Mazdoor Sangh Bina.

Lastly it is prayed that the Hon’ble Tribunal may be pleased to order the opposite party to deduct subscription of

above 19 members fromtheir salary and remit the same of Bhartiya Koyala Khadan Mazdoor Sangh Bina as per

code of conduct check of system union may be allowed to participate in all negotiation as a recognized union. The

action of the management for not deducting the subscription of above 19 employees may be declared as unfair

labor practice of the management.

Management filed written statement alleging there in that with reference to contents of paras 1&2 of alleged

statement of claim of the union, it is submitted that the trade union as named BKKMS was representing the

employees of Khadia Project Unit in the year 2013 & 2014 under the system of Industrial relations and Sri Onkar

Nath Yadav was a President of the said trade union at that time. It is admitted that all the decisions pertaining to

industrial relations and welfare of the employees are being decided by constituting agency in which those unions

are entitled to participate in negotiations whose memberships up to the mark of 20% of total workers of the

project. It is further submitted that it is necessary to maintain participation in JCC. 20% membership as per code

of conduct of CHECK of System. It is worth to mention that if the membership of any union is less that 20%

continuously for 2 years in a unit or project, then that union will lost representation in negotiations related to

industrial relation system as per point no. 5(D) of Code of Conduct of Check off System and then, the employer

will give information of this respect to the alleged union. The BKKMS union could not maintain continuously 2

years 20% membership in the year 2013 and 2014. Rest of the contents is denied.

The management has denied the entire claim of the union in totality and stated that the claim of the union is

devoid of merit and is liable to be rejected.

The present case was taken up for hearing on several dates but the representative for the union put his appearance

before the tribunal only on a few dates like 13.10.16 and on 04.0717 and thereafter stopped attending the

proceedings of the case for the reasons best known to him. Therefore, it appears that the union is not interested in

prosecuting their case as neither had they filed any documentary evidence in the case nor any one appeared from

their side for oral evidence.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case management also endorsed on the order sheet on 24.07.18,

that the management is also not interested to adduce any evidence oral or documentary in the case.

Therefore, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case It is quite evident that it is a case of no

evidence, as such the reference s bound to be decided against the union holding that the union is not entitled for

any relief.

10.

Award is made accordingly.

SHUBHENDRA KUMAR, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 20 vxLr] 2018

dk-vk- 1261-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ bZLVuZ

dksyiQhYM fyfeVsM ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 12@2011) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

14-08-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&22012@60@2011&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º

jktsUæ flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

5212

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 25, 2018/BHADRA 3, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 20th August, 2018

S.O. 1261.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 12/2011) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. E.C.L., and their

workmen, received by the Central Government on 14.08.2018.

[No. L-22012/60/2011-IR (CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL

PRESENT : Shri Pramod Kumar Mishra, Presiding Officer

REFERENCE NO. 12 OF 2011

PARTIES :

The Management of Madhujore Colliery of M/s. ECL

v/s

Shri Bhagwan Kahar

REPRESENTATIVES :

For the Management

Shri P. K. Das, Learned Advocate

For the Union (Workman) :

None

Industry : Coal

State : West Bengal

Dated : 13.07.2018

AWARD

In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-section (1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), Govt. of India through the Ministry of Labour vide its letter NO. L-

22012/60/2011–IR (CM-II) dated 08.07.2011 has been pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by this

Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

“ Whether the action of the management of Madhujore Colliery under Kajora Area of M/s. ECL in dismissing

Shri Bhagwan Kahar, U.G. Trammer, UM No. 631439 w.e.f. 10.11.2008 is legal and justified? To what relief

the workman is entitled to? ”

Having received the Order NO. L-22012/60/2011–IR (CM-II) dated 08.07.2011 of the above said reference from

the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a Reference Case No. 12 of 2011 was

registered on 25.07.2011 / 09.12.2011. Accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through the

registered post to the parties concerned, directing them to appear in the court, on the date fixed and to file their written

statements along with the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance of the said

order notices by the registered post were sent to the parties concerned. Both the parties appeared in the Tribunal, through

their representative.

Case called out. Shri P. K. Das, learned advocate of the management of Madhujore Colliery under Kajora Area of

M/s. ECL appeared. But none appeared on behalf of the union / workman.

On perusal of the case record I find that the case was fixed for filing Voter Identity Card of the claimant on

18.09.2013. But unfortunately none is appearing on behalf of the union / workman since 18.09.2013. So far 17 dates have

been granted after 11.07.2013 for filing Voter Identity Card of the Claimant. Registered Notice was also issued to the

workman / union on 19.08.2014 but all in vain. It seems to me that the legal heirs of the deceased workman does not

want to contest this case further. As such the case is closed and accordingly a ‘No Dispute Award’ is hereby passed.

O R D E R

Let an “Award” be and the same is passed as per above discussion. Send the copies of the order to the Govt. of

India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for information and needful. The reference is accordingly disposed of.

PRAMOD KUMAR MISHRA, Presiding Officer

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 25] 2018@Hkkæ 3] 1940

5213

ubZ fnYyh] 20 vxLr] 2018

dk-vk- 1262-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ bZLVuZ

dksyiQhYM fyfeVsM ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 14@2011) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

14-08-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&22012@76@2011&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º

jktsUæ flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 20th August, 2018

S.O. 1262.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 14/2011) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. E.C.L., and their

workmen, received by the Central Government on 14.08.2018.

[No. L-22012/76/2011-IR (CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL

PRESENT : Shri Pramod Kumar Mishra, Presiding Officer

REFERENCE NO. 14 OF 2011

PARTIES :

The management of Bejdih Colliery of M/s. ECL

v/s

Shri Purnendu Sarkar

REPRESENTATIVES :

For the Management

Shri P. K. Das, Learned Advocate

For the Union (Workman) :

Shri R. K. Tripathi, Union Representative

Industry : Coal

State : West Bengal

Dated : 13.07.2018

AWARD

In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-section (1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947), Govt. of India through the Ministry of Labour vide its letter NO. L-

22012/76/2011–IR (CM-II) dated 14.07.2011 has been pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by this

Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

“ Whether the action of the management of Bejdih Colliery of M/s. ECL in discontinuation of H.R.A. to

Shri Purnendu Sarkar, Mech. Fitter is legal and justified? To what relief the workman concerned is entitled

to? ”

Having received the Order NO. L-22012/76/2011–IR (CM-II) dated 14.07.2011 of the above said reference from

the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a Reference Case

No. 14 of 2011 was registered on 28.07.2011 / 09.12.2011. Accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue

notices through the registered post to the parties concerned, directing them to appear in the court, on the date fixed and to

file their written statements along with the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In

pursuance of the said order notices by the registered post were sent to the parties concerned. Both the parties appeared in

the Tribunal, through their representative.

Case called out. Shri P. K. Das, learned advocate appeared on behalf of the management of Bejdih Colliery of

M/s. ECL and Shri R. K. Tripathi, learned union representative appeared on behalf of the workman

Shri Purnendu Sarkar.

Shri R. K. Tripathi, learned union representative submits that the case may be closed as the workman is now not

willing to contest the case further and an endorsement in this regard has be3en made by him on the order sheet. As the

5214

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 25, 2018/BHADRA 3, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

workman is now not at all interested to proceed with the case further the case is closed and accordingly a ‘No Dispute

Award’ is hereby passed.

O R D E R

Let an “Award” be and the same is passed as per above discussion. Send the copies of the order to the Govt. of

India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for information and needful. The reference is accordingly disposed of.

PRAMOD KUMAR MISHRA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 20 vxLr] 2018

dk-vk- 1263-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ bZLVuZ

dksyiQhYM fyfeVsM ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 15@2011) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

14-08-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&22012@115@2011&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º

jktsUæ flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 20th August, 2018

S.O. 1263.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 15/2011) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. E.C.L., and their

workmen, received by the Central Government on 14.08.2018.

[No. L-22012/115/2011-IR (CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL

PRESENT : Shri Pramod Kumar Mishra, Presiding Officer

REFERENCE NO. 15 OF 2011

PARTIES :

The Management of Sodepur Area of M/s. ECL

v/s

Shri Ram Dulal Neogi

REPRESENTATIVES :

For the Management

Shri P. K. Das, Learned Advocate

For the Union (Workman) :

Shri Y. P. Tripathi, Union Representative

Industry : Coal

State : West Bengal

Dated : 16.07.2018

AWARD

In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-section (1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947), Govt. of India through the Ministry of Labour vide its letter NO. L-

22012/115/2011–IR (CM-II) dated 08.08.2011 has been pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by this

Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

“ Whether the action of the management of Parbelia Colliery under Sodepur Area of M/s. ECL in denying

promotion / national seniority to Shri Ram Dulal Neogi, Accounts Clerk at par with Shri Joynath Choubey,

Accounts Clerk is legal and justified? To what relief the workman concerned is entitled to? ”

Having received the Order NO. L-22012/115/2011–IR (CM-II) dated 08.08.2011 of the above said reference

from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a Reference Case No. 15 of 2011

was registered on 25.08.2011 / 09.12.2011. Accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through the

registered post to the parties concerned, directing them to appear in the court, on the date fixed and to file their written

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 25] 2018@Hkkæ 3] 1940

5215

statements along with the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance of the said

order notices by the registered post were sent to the parties concerned. Both the parties appeared in the Tribunal, through

their representative.

Case called out. Shri P. K. Das, learned advocate appeared on behalf of the management of Parbelia Group of

M/s. ECL. But none appeared on behalf of the union / workman.

On perusal of the case record I find that the representative of the workman, Shri Y. P Tripathi, General Secretary

of the union last appeared before the Court on 30.09.2014. Thereafter 8 (Eight) dates were granted but neither the

workman nor the union never appeared after 30.09.2014. Registered notice was also sent to the union on 15.10.2015, but

to no effect. It seems that the workman / union is not at all interested to proceed with the case further. Hence the case is

closed and accordingly a ‘No Dispute Award’ is hereby passed.

O R D E R

Let an “Award” be and the same is passed as per above discussion. Send the copies of the order to the Govt. of

India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for information and needful. The reference is accordingly disposed of.

PRAMOD KUMAR MISHRA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 20 vxLr] 2018

dk-vk- 1264-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ bZLVuZ

dksyiQhYM fyfeVsM ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 18@2011) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

14-08-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&22012@123@2011&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º

jktsUæ flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 20th August, 2018

S.O. 1264.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 18/2011) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. E.C.L., and their

workmen, received by the Central Government on 14.08.2018.

[No. L-22012/123/2011-IR (CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL

PRESENT : Shri Pramod Kumar Mishra, Presiding Officer

REFERENCE NO. 18 OF 2011

PARTIES :

The management of Khas Kajora Colliery of M/s. ECL

v/s

Shri Tulsi Bhuia

REPRESENTATIVES :

For the Management

Shri P. K. Das, Learned Advocate

For the Union (Workman) :

Shri Rakesh Kumar, Union Representative

Industry : Coal

State : West Bengal

Dated : 16.07.2018

AWARD

In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-section (1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947), Govt. of India through the Ministry of Labour vide its letter NO. L-

22012/123/2011–IR (CM-II) dated 19.09.2011 has been pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by this

Tribunal.

5216

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 25, 2018/BHADRA 3, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

SCHEDULE

“ Whether the action of the management of Khas Kajora Colliery, Kajora Area of M/s. Eastern Coalfields

Limited, in dismissing Shri Tulsi Bhuia, Dresser, UM No. 553673 w.e.f. 16.07.2008 is legal and justified? To

what relief the workman concerned is entitled to? ”

Having received the Order No. L-22012/123/2011–IR (CM-II) dated 19.09.2011 of the above said reference from

the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a Reference Case No. 18 of 2011 was

registered on 07.10.2011 / 09.12.2011. Accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through the

registered post to the parties concerned, directing them to appear in the court, on the date fixed and to file their written

statements along with the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance of the said

order notices by the registered post were sent to the parties concerned. Both the parties appeared in the Tribunal, through

their representative.

Case called out. Shri P. K. Das, learned advocate appeared on behalf of the management of Khas Kajora Colliery

of M/s. ECL. Shri Rakesh Kumar, learned union representative appeared on behalf of the workman Shri Tulsi Bhuia.

Shri Rakesh Kumar, learned union representative of the workman submits that the workman has died and he has

got no instruction from the claimant for substitution. So the case may kindly be closed. He has also put remarks to the

effect on the order sheet. Since the workman has died and no substitution petition has been filed so far. It seems that the

workman’s legal heir(s) has not at all interested to proceed with the case further. Hence the case is closed and

accordingly a ‘No Dispute Award’ is hereby passed.

O R D E R

Let an “Award” be and the same is passed as per above discussion. Send the copies of the order to the Govt. of

India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for information and needful. The reference is accordingly disposed of.

PRAMOD KUMAR MISHRA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 20 vxLr] 2018

dk-vk- 1265-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ bZLVuZ

dksyiQhYM fyfeVsM ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] vklulksy ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 32@2007) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

14-08-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&22012@224@2006&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º

jktsUæ flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 20th August, 2018

S.O. 1265.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 32/2007) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. E.C.L., and their

workmen, received by the Central Government on 14.08.2018.

[No. L-22012/224/2006-IR (CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL

PRESENT : Shri Pramod Kumar Mishra, Presiding Officer

REFERENCE NO. 32 OF 2007

PARTIES :

The management of J. K. Nagar (R) Colliery of M/s. ECL

v/s

Shri Chandrika Bhuia

REPRESENTATIVES :

For the Management

Shri P. K. Goswami, Learned Advocate

For the Union (Workman) :

Shri Sayantan Mukherjee, Learned Advocate

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 25] 2018@Hkkæ 3] 1940

5217

Industry : Coal

State : West Bengal

Dated : 05.04.2018

AWARD

In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-section(1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947), Govt. of India through the Ministry of Labour vide its letter

No. L-22012/224/2006–IR (CM-II) dated 30.05.2007 has been pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by

this Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

“ Whether the action of the management of J. K. Nagar Colliery under Satgram Area of M/s. ECL in

dismissing Shri Chandrika Bhuia from services w.e.f. 06.07.2000 is legal and justified? If not, to what relief is

the workman entitled? ”

Having received the Order No. L-22012/224/2006–IR (CM-II) dated 30.05.2007 of the above said reference from

the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a Reference Case No. 32 of 2007 was

registered on 11.07.2007. Accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through the registered post to

the parties concerned, directing them to appear in the court, on the date fixed and to file their written statements along

with the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance of the said order notices by

the registered post were sent to the parties concerned. Both the parties appeared in the Tribunal, through their

representative.

Case called out. Shri P. K. Goswami, learned advocate appeared on behalf of the management of J. K. Nagar (R)

Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited but none appeared on behalf of the workman, Shri Chandrika Bhuia.

On perusal of the case record I find that the case was fixed for filing evidence of the workman on 10.06.2010.

Thereafter 44 (Forty Four) dates have been passed, resulting in elapse of more than 7½ (Seven and Half) years, but

neither the workman nor his learned advocate took any step for filing the evidence of the workman. Last chances on

request of Shri Sayantan Mukherjee, learned advocate of the workman were granted several times since 17.05.2016, but

to no effect. Under the circumstances explained above it is clear that the workman is not at all interested to proceed with

the case further. The reference is also more than 10 (Ten) years old – of the year 2007. I have no option left but to close

the case. As such the case is closed and accordingly a ‘No Dispute Award’ is hereby passed.

O R D E R

Let an “Award” be and the same is passed as per above discussion. Send the copies of the order to the Govt. of

India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for information and needful. The reference is accordingly disposed of.

PRAMOD KUMAR MISHRA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 20 vxLr] 2018

dk-vk- 1266-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ iwQM

dkjiksjs'ku vkWiQ bafM;k ,aM vnlZ ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] Hkqous'oj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 82@2013) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh;

ljdkj dks 07-08-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&22011@11@2013&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º

jktsUæ flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 20th August, 2018

S.O. 1266.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 82/2013) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Bhubaneswar as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. Food

Corporation of India and others and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 07.08.2018.

[No. L-22011/11/2013-IR (CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

5218

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 25, 2018/BHADRA 3, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, BHUBANESWAR

Present:

Shri B.C. Rath,

Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-cum-Labour

Court, Bhubaneswar

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 82/2013

No. L-22011/11/2013-IR (DU), dated 28.05.2014

Date of Passing Order – 25^th June, 2018

Between :

The Area Manager,

Food Corporation of India,

District Office, O.T. Road,

Balasore – 756 001.

The General Manager,

Food Corporation of India,

Regional Office, Satsang Vihar,

Vani Vihar, Bhubaneswar – 751 007.

…1^st Party-Managements

(And)

The Vice President,

Food Corporation of India Handling Workers’ Union,

8651, Arakashan Road, Pahar Ganj,

New Delhi – 110 056

…2^nd Party-Union.

Appearances :

Shri R.K. Jena,

…

For the 1^st Party-

Area Manager.

Managements.

None

…

For the 2^nd Party-Union

ORDER

Authorized representative of the Management is present, whereas no one appears on behalf of the 2^nd party-Union

on repeated calls. It is submitted by the authorized representative of the Management that the 2^nd party-Union is not

taking any steps for the last several adjournments for which the reference is lingering without adjudication in a routine

manner and it has been insisted on behalf of the Management that either a Nil award be given or the statement of claim of

the Union may be rejected.

Perused the record. It is seen that after filing of statement by the parties and settlement of issues, the Union is not

taking any steps for which the Tribunal is facing difficulty to adjudicate the dispute due to lack of evidence from the side

of the Union. At the same time the reference cannot be adjourned from time to time in a mechanically manner for an

indefinite period. Admittedly, in absence of evidence on the part of the 2^nd party-Union it is difficult to adjudicate and

decide a dispute and no award is possible to be made. Further, there is no provisions in the Act to pass a No Dispute

Award or to determine the question as to whether or not there was a dispute between the parties by the Tribunal. Hence,

passing of a no-dispute award would be a misconceived. It cannot be over-sighted in the case of B.R. Bermen & Mohatta

(India) Pvt. Limited –versus- The Seventh Industrial Tribunal, West Bengal and others, 1977 LAB I.C. (NOC) 13 (CAL),

the Hon’ble High Court of Calcutta have held that:

“if the dispute cannot be settled in the absence of both the parties there would be no materials before it

to decide such dispute. In such event, no award is possible to be made by the authority concerned and as

such the provision has been made under Rule 22 to submit a suitable report to the state Government

and to put an end to the proceeding before the Tribunal. When both the parties fail to appar nothing

remains pending before the authority concerned to whom the dispute is referred although the dispute

remains outstanding and not adjudicated. In such event, section 20(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act

which provides for the termini of the proceedings cannot be attracted because no final or any award can

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vxLr 25] 2018@Hkkæ 3] 1940

5219

be made whereby the dispute can be resolved….Until the adjudication of the dispute referred to the

authority concerned, an award cannot be made within the meaning of an award as defined in Section

2(b) of the Act…..So long as the dispute remained unsettled and the proceedings came to an end without

adjudicating upon the dispute between the parties there was no bar under the Industrial Disputes Act

whereby the Government was precluded from referring the dispute over again so that there might be an

industrial adjudication of the dispute as contemplated by the said Act”

Keeping in view the above fact and principles it is felt that there is no alternative than to return the reference

without adjudication of the dispute. Accordingly the reference case is disposed of and the copy of the order be sent to the

Ministry of Labour of taking necessary action at their end.

Dictated & Corrected by me.

B. C. RATH, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 20 vxLr] 2018

dk-vk- 1267-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ iwQM

dkjiksjs'ku vkWiQ bafM;k ,aM vnlZ ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] Hkqous'oj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 83@2013) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh;

ljdkj dks 07-08-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&22011@10@2013&vkbZvkj (lh,e&II)º

jktsUæ flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 20th August, 2018

S.O. 1267.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 83/2013) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Bhubaneswar as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. Food

Corporation of India and others and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 07.08.2018.

[No. L-22011/10/2013-IR (CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, BHUBANESWAR

Present:

Shri B.C. Rath,

Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-cum-Labour

Court, Bhubaneswar

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 83/2013

No. L-22011/10/2013-IR (DU), dated 28.05.2014

Date of Passing Order – 25^th June, 2018

Between :

The General Manager,

Food Corporation of India,

Regional Office, Satsang Vihar,

Vani Vihar, Bhubaneswar – 751 007.

The Area Manager,

Food Corporation of India,

District Office, Sambalpur, Po. Modipara,

Dist. Sambalpur.

…1^st Party-Managements

5220

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 25, 2018/BHADRA 3, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(And)

The Vice President,

Food Corporation of India Handling Workers’ Union,

8651, Arakashan Road, Pahar Ganj,

New Delhi – 110 056

…2^nd Party-Union

Appearances:

Shri R.P. Ganik, Manager (G).

…

For the 1^st Party-Managements