5000 GI/2018
(5337)
jftLVªh la- Mh- ,y- (,u) 04@0007@2003µ05
REGD. No. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05
izkf/dkj ls izdkf'kr
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
lkIrkfgd
WEEKLY
la- 35]
ubZ fnYyh] flrEcj 2—flrEcj 8] 2018] 'kfuokj@Hkkæ 11—Hkkæ 17] 1940
No. 35]
NEW DELHI, SEPTEMBER 2—SEPTEMBER 8, 2018, SATURDAY/BHADRA 11—BHADRA 17, 1940
bl Hkkx esa fHkUu i`"B la[;k nh tkrh gS ftlls fd ;g i`Fkd ladyu ds :i esa j[kk tk lds
Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation
Hkkx II—[k.M 3—mi&[k.M (ii)
PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)
Hkkjr ljdkj ds ea=kky;ksa (j{kk ea=kky; dks NksM+dj) }kjk tkjh fd, x, lkafof/d vkns'k vkSj vf/lwpuk,a
Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India
(Other than the Ministry of Defence)
िव मंालय
िव मंालय
िव मंालय
िव मंालय
(िवीय सेवाएं िवभाग
िवीय सेवाएं िवभाग
िवीय सेवाएं िवभाग
िवीय सेवाएं िवभाग)
नई दली, 3 अग त, 2018
का.आ
का.आ
का.आ
का.आ. 1318
1318
1318
1318.—कीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासकय योजन के िलए योग) िनयम, 1976 (1987 म यथा संशोिधत)
के िनयम 10 के उप िनयम (4) के अनुसरण म भारतीय टेट ब/क के सूचीब2 काया3लय/शाखा5 को अिधसूिचत करती है, िजनके 80% से
अिधक कम3चा8रय ने 9हंदी का काय3साधक :ान ा; कर िलया है : -
<.सं.
ब/क का नाम
शाखा5/काया3लय क सं>या
1.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
128
कुल
कुल
कुल
कुल
128
128
128
128
[फा.सं. 11016/2/2017-9हं.(अिध.)]
शैलेश कुमार 9संह, संयु? िनदेशक (राजभाषा)
5338
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
भारतीय टेट बक, अहमदाबाद मंडल
भारतीय टेट बक, अहमदाबाद मंडल
भारतीय टेट बक, अहमदाबाद मंडल
भारतीय टेट बक, अहमदाबाद मंडल राजभाषा िनयम
राजभाषा िनयम
राजभाषा िनयम
राजभाषा िनयम 1976
1976
1976
1976 के िनयम
के िनयम
के िनयम
के िनयम 10 (4)
10 (4)
10 (4)
10 (4) के अंतगत
के अंतगत
के अंतगत
के अंतगत
अिधसूिचत कराने हेतु कायालय#
अिधसूिचत कराने हेतु कायालय#
अिधसूिचत कराने हेतु कायालय#
अिधसूिचत कराने हेतु कायालय#/शाखा& क' सूची
शाखा& क' सूची
शाखा& क' सूची
शाखा& क' सूची
1.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
एमसीजी हलाद नगर शाखा
शॉप नं 5, थम तल
इAथ कारपोरेट,
हलादनगर
अहमदाबाद (गुजरात)
िपन – 380015
2.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
मानसी सक3 ल वCापुर शाखा
भूतल, ाइमेट
मदर िमक पैलेस के सामने
वCापुर
अहमदाबाद (गुजरात)
िपन – 380015
3.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
एिलसिDज आFम रोड शाखा
“काGाना” भूतल
आंबावाडी
अहमदाबाद (गुजरात)
िपन – 380006
4
भारतीय टेट ब/क
आरएसीपीसी आFम रोड
बी/2 अजंता कॉमशIयल सेAटर
आयकर सक3 ल के पास,
आFम रोड
अहमदाबाद (गुजरात)
िपन – 380004
5.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
क8रJ माबाग चार रता मणीनगर शाखा
ाईम Kलाजा,
रावजीभाई टावर के सामने
कृMणबाग चार रता,
मणीनगर
अहमदाबाद (गुजरात)
िपन – 380008
6.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
वायपूNय चेOबर,
आFम रोड शाखा
शीतल वषा3 -II
नथूभाई हॉपीटल के सामने
उमानपुरा
अहमदाबाद (गुजरात)
िपन – 380013
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940
5339
7.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
प8रमल गाड3न शाखा
देव काOपलेQस, भूतल
सी.जी. रोड ,
प8रमल गाड3न के सामने
अहमदाबाद (गुजरात)
िपन – 380006
8.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
रामदेवनगर <ॉस रोड शाखा
इकॉन पाक3
ओम टावर के सामने,
सेटेलाइट रोड
अहमदाबाद (गुजरात)
िपन – 380015
9.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
साइंस िसटी वेट शाखा
स;क कारपोरेट हाऊस, भूतल
सुकन मॉल के पास,
साइंस िसटी रोड, सोला
अहमदाबाद (गुजरात)
िपन – 380060
10.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
Rरंग रोड बोपल शाखा
शॉप नं 1-7,
भूतल आSपाली एिQसओम
बोपल जंQशन के पास,
बोपल , अहमदाबाद (गुजरात)
िपन – 380058
11.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
धंधुका इट शाखा
शॉप नं 51,
रेवे टेशन के सामने
अडावन नाका,
मामलतदार काया3लय के पास
धंधुका, अहमदाबाद (गुजरात)
िपन – 382460
12.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
िमड कॉरपोरेट
सी जी रोड़ शाखा
शॉप नं.1 एवं 2,
सकुन िबजनस सेA टर, भूतल
वाि तक चार रा ता,
नवरंगपुरा, सी.जी. रोड
अहमदाबाद -380009
13.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
Aयू सी जी रोड शाखा
शॉप नं 29 से 34, सृजन II
5340
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
सहारा कॉ-आपरेटीव सोसायटी,
भूतल, Aयू सी.जी. रोड
अहमदाबाद (गुजरात)
िपन -382424
14.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
एसएमई आFम रोड़ शाखा
नगीनदास चेOबर, भूतल
उ मानपुरा, आFम रोड
अहमदाबाद (गुजरात)
िपन – 380014
15.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
जवाहर चौक, मणीनगर शाखा
साकार िब9डंग, जवाहर चौक
मणीनगर , अहमदाबाद (गुजरात)
िपन – 380008
16.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
एसबीआई इनटच मकरबा शाखा
बी -7 सफल सोली8टयर, भूतल
मकरबा, एस.जी. हाईवे
अहमदाबाद (गुजरात)
िपन - 380055
17.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
एसबीआई इनटच आंबावाडी शाखा
अUमेघ ऐिलगस 3 एवं 4, भूतल
कयाण Nवैलस3 के सामने,
आंबावाडी <ॉस रोड,
आंबावाडी, अहमदाबाद (गुजरात)
िपन – 380015
18.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
एसबीआई इनटच मोटेरा शाखा
4 डी कावर, 82-83, भूतल
आईआईटी इंजीिनयRरंग कालेज के सामने ,
िवसत-गांधीनगर हाईवे मोटेरा
अहमदाबाद (गुजरात)
िपन – 380005
19.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
एसबीआई इनटच हलादनगर शाखा
“पुMपक” 7 एवं 8 भूतल,
9संडीकेट ब/क के पीछे
हलादनगर गाड3न के सामने,
सेटेलाइट, हलादनगर
िजला- अहमदाबाद (गुजरात)
िपन -380015
20.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
एसबीआई इनटच िशवरंजनी शाखा
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940
5341
“िशवािलक हाई Wीट” 3 - ए बी सी डी,
भूतल, केशव बाग पाटI Kलोट के पास,
िशवरंजनी, वCापुर
अहमदाबाद (गुजरात)
िपन – 380015
21.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
एसबीआई इनटच सी.जी. रोड शाखा
ओिलव आकX ड 2, भूतल
िगरीश कोड 9Yंक <ास रोड के पास
ऑफ सी.जी. रोड, नवरंगपुरा
अहमदाबाद (गुजरात)
िपन – 380006
22.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
मालवण चौकडी शाखा
गांव – मालवण
तहसील – दसाडा
िजला – सुरेAनगर (गुजरात)
िपन – 382745
23.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
वंदेमातरम गोता शाखा
एन वाय कवायर Kलोट नं 253/4
गणेश काय लाइन के पास,
वृदावन हाईZस के सामने
चैनपुर, गोता
अहमदाबाद (गुजरात)
िपन – 382481
24.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
मोटेरा कोटेUर रोड शाखा
शॉप नं 5 से 8,
देव ाईड, भूतल
आतीश टॉवर रेिसडेAसी के पास,
मोटेरा , अहमदाबाद (गुजरात)
िपन – 380005
25.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
एस पी Rरंगरोड शीलज चौकडी शाखा
‘ए’ कवेयर,
भूतल शॉप नं 3 से 8
शीलज सक3 ल, एस पी Rरंग रोड
शीलज , अहमदाबाद (गुजरात)
िपन – 380059
26.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
चौसर रोड जेतलपुर शाखा
चौसर रोड,
एनएसआईटी कॉलेज के सामने
जेतलपुर, तहसील – दसकोई
5342
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
िजला – अहमदाबाद (गुजरात)
िपन – 382427
27.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
वटवा शाखा
आशापुरी रेसीडेAसी, भूतल,
शॉप नं 21 से 25
महाल[मी कॉन3र,
िव\ा स8रता के पास
गांव – वटवा
अहमदाबाद (गुजरात)
िपन – 382440
28.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
घणाद शाखा
गांव – घणाद
तहसील – लखतर
िजला- सुरेAनगर (गुजरात)
िपन – 363110
29.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
शाCीनगर शाखा
शॉप नं 2 एवं 3, भूतल,
िशवािलक यश काOपलेQस
शाCीनगर बीआरटीएस बस टेAड के सामने
132 Rरंग रोड, नारायणपुरा
अहमदाबाद (गुजरात)
िपन – 380013
30.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
गु]कुल रोड धांग^ा शाखा
िशवम काOपलेQस
िशव शि? होAडा ऐजेAसी के सामने
भागवतधाम के पास,
हलवद रोड
तहसील धांग^ा
िजला – सुरेAनगर (गुजरात)
िपन - 363310
31.
भारतीय टेट ब/क,
सेQटर 22 शाखा,
Kलॉट नं. 718,
मेईन शोप_ग सेAटर,
पंचदेव मंदर के पीछे,
सेQटर – 22,
िजला– गांधीनगर (गुजरात)
िपन - 382022
32.
भारतीय टेट ब/क,
भाट एयर पोट3 रोड शाखा,
Fी वामीनारायण िवFाम भुवन,
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940
5343
अपोलो होपीटल के पास, भाट
िजला–गांधीनगर (गुजरात)
िपन – 382428
33.
भारतीय टेट ब/क,
सुमन टॉवर शाखा,
Kलॉट नं. 17,
िसनेमेQस कॉOKलेQस,
सुमन िसटी, सेQटर – 11,
िजला – गांधीनगर (गुजरात)
िपन – 382011
34.
भारतीय टेट ब/क,
एसबीआई इनटच इAफोिसटी शाखा,
आईटी टॉवर नं.1, भूतल
इAफॉसीटी कॉOKलेQस,
एयर पोट3 रोड़,
गांधीनगर
िजला– गांधीनगर (गुजरात)
िपन - 382009
35.
भारतीय टेट ब/क,
कॉलेज रोड़ मेहसाणा शाखा,
थम तल, जयदेव कॉOKलेQस,
पशाभाई पेWोल पंप के सामने,
हाईवे रोड़,
िजला–मेहसाणा (गुजरात)
िपन - 384002
36.
भारतीय टेट ब/क,
हाईवे रोड शाखा,
सवX नं. 657,
एचपी पेWोल पंप के पास,
aाम पंचायत काया3लय के सामने,
हाईवे, बेचराजी
िजला-मेहसाणा (गुजरात)
िपन - 384210
37.
भारतीय टेट ब/क,
मोढेरा रोड शाखा,
गोकुल मेरीडीयन कॉO K लेQ स,
टbको पाटI Kलॉट के पास,
मोढेरा रोड़,
िजला–मेहसाणा (गुजरात)
िपन - 384002
38.
भारतीय टेट ब/क,
एसबीआई इनटच शाखा,
5344
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ऑरबीट िबज़नेस हब,
दुकान नं. 1 से 6,
देना ब/क के पास,
राधनपुर रोड,
िजला–मेहसाणा (गुजरात)
िपन - 384002
39.
भारतीय टेट ब/क,
सहकारी िजन रोड शाखा,
उमा कॉOKलेQस,
Kलॉट नं. 9-10,
राजमहेल सोसायटी,
सहकारी िजन रोड,
9हंमतनगर,
िजला साबरकांठा (गुजरात)
िपन -383001
40.
भारतीय टेट ब/क,
पुंसरी शाखा, पुंसरी
तालुका – तलोद
िजला - साबरकांठा (गुजरात)
िपन - 383307
41.
भारतीय टेट ब/क,
अहमदाबाद हाईवे पालनपुर शाखा
1, 2 एवं 25,
ल[मी िवMणु कॉOKलेQ स,
गठामण पा8टया के पास,
पालनपुर
िजला-बनासकांठा (गुजरात)
िपन - 385001
42.
भारतीय टेट ब/क,
शंखेUर शाखा,
राधे शॉ9पंग सेAटर,
शोcम – Qयु
(भूतल एवं थम तल)
शंखेUर
िजला-पाटण (गुजरात)
िपन - 384246
43.
भारतीय टेट ब/क,
अखोल चौकड़ी शाखा,
कोDा फेQटरी के पास,
धानेरा रोड़, अखोल चौकड़ी,
तालुका डीसा
िजला-बनासकांठा (गुजरात)
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940
5345
िपन – 385535
44.
भारतीय टेट ब/क,
खाdज चौकड़ी शाखा,
Kलॉट नं. 949,
ोपटI नं. 1653,
खाdज चौकड़ी, मbधा रोड,
मेहमदाबाद
िजला-खेड़ा (गुजरात)
िपन – 387130
45.
भारतीय टेट ब/क,
मालपुर रोड़ शाखा,
3बी-4बी, काeत3केय सोसायटी,
मालपुर रोड
मोड़ासा
िजला-अरवली (गुजरात)
िपन - 383315
46.
भारतीय टेट ब/क,
एसबीआई इनटच उfरसंड़ा शाखा,
22 से 25,
एल hेयर िबड़_ग,
डी-माड3 के सामने
नड़ीयाद
िजला-खेड़ा (गुजरात)
िपन - 387001
47.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
Aयू कोठा8रया रोड़ शाखा
राधे कॉOKलेQस
सरदार गेस एजसी,
रोलेQस रोड
कोठा8रया राजकोट
िजला राजकोट (गुजरात)
िपन-360002
48
भारतीय टेट ब/क
टjलkग हॉिपटल ऐ8रया शाखा,
राजकोट टाइम hायर
अयोlया चौक
150 फट Rरंग रोड
िजला राजकोट (गुजरात)
िपन-360007
49
भारतीय टेट ब/क
पी डी मालिवया फाटक शाखा
दुकान सं.1 - 4
सनराईज़ अपाट3मट
जसाणी कूल गडल रोड
िजला राजकोट (गुजरात)
िपन-360004
5346
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
50
भारतीय टेट ब/क
रामधाम Kलॉट शाखा
मंगल करण
रामधाम Kलॉट, कालावाड़ रोड
िजला राजकोट (गुजरात)
िपन-360005
51
भारतीय टेट ब/क
वािणयावाड़ी शाखा
धोला8रया वािणया वाड़ी
गायdीनगर मु>य रोड
राधेJयाम डेयरी फाम3
िजला राजकोट (गुजरात)
िपन-360001
52
भारतीय टेट ब/क
एसबीआई इनटच शाखा
कालावाड़ रोड
“िबज़नस बे”, दुकान सं. 1 एवं 2
पंजाब हडा के सामने
कालावाड़ रोड,
िजला राजकोट (गुजरात)
िपन-360005
53
भारतीय टेट ब/क
जेतपर शाखा
मुकाम पोट जेतपर (मछु)
जेतपर अिनयारी रोड, जेतपर
िजला मोरबी (गुजरात)
िपन-363630
54
भारतीय टेट ब/क
जनता फाटक शाखा
थम तल,
कंकु कॉOKलेQस
जनता फाटक
िजला-जामनगर (गुजरात)
िपन-361006
55
भारतीय टेट ब/क
केनेडी शाखा
केनेडी गाँव
तालुका कयाणपुर वाया- भा8टया
िजला देवभूिम qारका (गुजरात)
िपन-361315
56
भारतीय टेट ब/क
सतापर शाखा
सतापर
तालुका – जामजोधपुर
िजला - जामनगर (गुजरात)
िपन-360531
57
भारतीय टेट ब/क
एसबीआई इनटच शाखा
जी-1, Kले8टनम hायर
पाक3 कॉलोनी,
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940
5347
जोगस3 पाक3 के पास
िजला- जामनगर (गुजरात)
िपन-361008
58
भारतीय टेट ब/क
एसबीआई 8रलायंस सक3 ल शाखा
दुकान सं. 112-113,
r sस hायर
Kलॉट सं. 2 एवं 3, वाड3-6,
रोटरी सक3ल,
टेगोर रोड, गांधीधाम (कuछ)
िजला- कuछ (गुजरात)
िपन-370201
59
भारतीय टेट ब/क
सुभाषनगर चार रता शाखा
Kलॉट सं. 8, डी/सी-2
सुभाषनगर मु>य माग3
गुcकुल के पास, गांधीधाम
िजला- कuछ (गुजरात)
िपन-370201
60
भारतीय टेट ब/क
सोनी बाजार शाखा
थम तल, Kलॉट सं. 271,
वाड3-12-बी,
गांधीधाम (कuछ)
िजला- कuछ (गुजरात)
िपन-370201
61
भारतीय टेट ब/क
एसबीआई इनटच टेगोर रोड शाखा
भगवती आकX ड Kलॉट सं.-2,
सेQटर-9, बीएसएनएल के सामने,
टेगोर रोड़ , गांधीधाम (कuछ)
िजला- कuछ (गुजरात)
िपन-370201
62
भारतीय टेट ब/क
माकXRटंग याड3 गडल शाखा
Fी गीता बेटरी सeव3स प8रसर
A यू माकXRटंग याड3 के सामने
गुंदाला चोकड़ी, गडल
िजला राजकोट (गुजरात)
िपन-360311
63
भारतीय टेट ब/क
संदपनी शाखा
िजला एवं सd Aयायालय भवन
संदपनी रोड
िजला-पोरबंदर (गुजरात)
िपन-360578
64.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
आर.सी. दf रोड़ शाखा
5348
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
103, बी.एन. चेOबस3
आर.सी. दf रोड
िजला-वडोदरा, (गुजरात)
िपन-390007
65.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
मोQसी शाखा
भूतल, चोरा वालु फलयु
शीव बाल मंदर के पास
गाँव मोQसी
तालुका सावली
िजला-वडोदरा (गुजरात)
िपन-391780
66.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
चकली सक3 ल शाखा
भागवत िनवास
चकली सक3 ल
जीईबी बड़ौदा के पास
िजला-वडोदरा, (गुजरात)
िपन-390007
67.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
जेतलपुर रोड शाखा
19-25, xलेिशयर कॉOKलेQस
जेतलपुर रोड
िजला-वडोदरा, (गुजरात)
िपन-390007
68.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
एसबीआई इनटच अकोटा शाखा
जी-2, पे8रडोट हब
ऊमI <ो9संग
मलहार पोल
िजला-वडोदरा, (गुजरात)
िपन-390007
69.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
िजला Aयायालय शाखा,
26/27, zज वाडी कॉOKलेQस,
वॉड3 नंबर 11 के पास,
साईनाथ माग3, नया कोट3 रोड
दवालीपुरा
िजला-वडोदरा, (गुजरात)
िपन-390015
70.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
िनलाOबर सक3 ल शाखा
दुकान नंबर 1 से 8
हनुमानजी मंदर के सामने
वासणा भायली रोड,
िजला-वडोदरा, (गुजरात)
िपन-391410
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940
5349
71.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
सोमातलाव शाखा,
दुकान नं. 1 से 8,
काAहा हाईZस,
सोमातलाव – डभोई रोड
िजला-वडोदरा (गुजरात)
िपन-390025
72.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
सुभानपुरा शाखा,
िवमलनाथ कॉOKलेQस Kलाज़ा,
सुभानपुरा हाई टेAशन रोड,
िजला-वडोदरा (गुजरात)
िपन-390007
73.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
जलाराम मंदर शाखा,
11-12, शीव शि? को-ओपरे8टव हाउ9संग सोसायटी,
जलाराम मंदर रोड,
कारेलीबाग,
िजला-वडोदरा (गुजरात)
िपन–390018
74.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
एसबीआई इनटच समा-सावली शाखा,
भूतल 36-37, लोटस ऑरा,
िलले8रया पाटI Kलॉट के सामने,
आईओसी पेWोल पOप के पास,
िजला-वडोदरा (गुजरात)
िपन-390024
75.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
एसबीआई इनटच फतेहगंज शाखा,
भूतल, इगल एपाट3मेAट,
फतेहगंज रोड,
िजला-वडोदरा (गुजरात)
िपन-390002
76.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
Aयू वीआईपी रोड शाखा,
साकार कॉOKलेQस,
सरदार एटेट के पास,
Aयू वीआईपी रोड,
िजला-वडोदरा (गुजरात)
िपन – 390019
77.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
मbवड शाखा,
ओम कॉOKलेQस,
5350
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
शॉप नंबर 24 और 25,
मbवड चौकडी,
गाँव मbवड, तालुका पादरा
िजला-वडोदरा (गुजरात)
िपन - 391440
78.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
मसर रोड शाखा,
मेइन माकXट रोड,
मसर रोड,
तालुका पादरा
िजला-वडोदरा (गुजरात)
िपन – 391421
79.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
कोलेज रोड शाखा,
सी/8, Fीिनवास हाउ9संग सोसाईटी,
िसिवल कोट3 के सामने, िसनोर रोड,
डभोई, िजला - वडोदरा (गुजरात)
िपन -391110
80.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
कंजरी रोड शाखा,
िनलकंठ एवेAयू,
12 मंगलम पाक3,
कंजरी रोड, हलोल,
पंचमहल (गुजरात)
िपन – 389350
81.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
कडाणा शाखा,
दरवाजा नंबर 318
दवाडा चौकडी पर,
कडाणा, गाँव – भेमासर,
तालुका – कडाणा,
िजला- महीसागर (गुजरात)
िपन -389250
82.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
िचखोदरा शाखा,
मोटो वAडो,
बैठक मंदर के सामने,
िचखोदरा,
िजला-आणंद (गुजरात)
िपन -388320
83.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
ओड शाखा, सालवा खाडा,
िबग िमक डेरी के सामने,
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940
5351
मेईन बाज़ार, तालुका – ओड
िजला-आणंद (गुजरात)
िपन -388210
84.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
िजतोिडया रोड शाखा,
माcित पंद,
आकृित नगर के सामने,
आणंद-िजतोिडया रोड,
िजला-आणंद (गुजरात)
िपन -388001
85.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
भादरण शाखा,
सोना टेकरी, बस टेAड के पास,
भादरण, िजला-आणंद (गुजरात)
िपन -388530
86.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
आरएसीपीसी, पहली मंिजल,
एसबीआई सयाजीगंज शाखा िब9डंग,
आराधना िसनेमा के सामने,
सयाजीगंज, िजला-वडोदरा, (गुजरात)
िपन -390001
87.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
एसबीआई इनटच शाखा
जी-5, सन हाम3नी
फूलवाडी चौक, िहल Yाइव
िजला-भावनगर (गुजरात)
िपन - 364 002
88.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
Rरंग रोड शाखा
शॉप नं. 16-19, दी कैिपटल
150 फट Rरंग रोड,
टॉप {ी सक3 ल
िजला-भावनगर (गुजरात)
िपन -364001
89.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
सीएसी शाखा
पहली मंिजल,
नीलमबाग चौक
िजला-भावनगर (गुजरात)
िपन-364001
90.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
dापज शाखा
अलंग रोड, ाथिमक कूल के पास
5352
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
तहसील तलाजा
िजला-भावनगर (गुजरात)
िपन -364150
91.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
अकाला शाखा
aाम पंचायत भवन
तहसील लाठी
िजला-अमरेली (गुजरात)
िपन - 365430
92.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
गलकोटडी शाखा
एनएच 136
रामजी मंदर के पास
कूल वाली गली
तहसील बाबरा
िजला-अमरेली (गुजरात)
िपन - 365421
93.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
एसबीआई इनटच शाखा
भूतल, िमलेिनयम आकXड
झंझरडा वायपास चौकड़ी
िजला-जूनागढ़ (गुजरात)
िपन - 362001
94.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
वालािसमडी शाखा
तहसील जूनागढ़
िजला-जूनागढ़ (गुजरात)
िपन – 362011
95.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
जंगर शाखा
तहसील मािलया
िजला-जूनागढ़ (गुजरात)
िपन - 362255
96.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
खंढेरी शाखा
खंढेरी मु>य बाजार
िजला-गीर सोमनाथ (गुजरात)
िपन - 362150
97.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
उमरवाडा शाखा,
16/1 वािनया फिलयू
गाँव- उमरवाड़ा
तहसील - अंकलेUर,
िजला- भ]च (गुजरात)
िपन - 393001
98.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
लखी शाखा
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940
5353
दहेज एसईजेड-II
शासिनक काया3लय कॉOपलेQस
लखीगाम, तहसील वागरा
िजला – भcच (गुजरात)
िपन - 392002
99
भारतीय टेट ब/क
सेलाOबा शाखा,
अंबे aीन िसटी,
एपीएमसी के नजदीक
गोटपाड़ा, सेलाOबा
िजला – नम3दा (गुजरात)
िपन - 393025
100
भारतीय टेट ब/क
उमराज शाखा,
शॉप नOबर-5,
ए<ोपोिलस दाहेज,
बाईपास रोड, उमराज
िजला- भ]च (गुजरात)
िपन - 392001
101
भारतीय टेट ब/क
मजुरा गेट शाखा,
गीताभा कॉOपलेQ स,
मजुरा गेट
किडवाला कूल के पास,
Rरंग रोड
िजला-सूरत (गुजरात)
िपन - 395002
102
भारतीय टेट ब/क
शीतल शॉ9पंग सटर शाखा
1-3 पहली मंिजल,
शीतल शॉ9पंग hेयर,
टjनkग Kवाइंट, भटार रोड
िजला-सूरत (गुजरात)
िपन - 395001
103
भारतीय टेट ब/क
िस 2ी रेिसडसी शाखा
शॉप नOपर-13-14
िस 2ी रेिसडसी Aयू पाल रोड,
पाल-अडाजन,
तहसील- चौरसी
िजला-सूरत (गुजरात)
िपन – 394510
104
भारतीय टेट ब/क
अंबाजी माकXट शाखा
अंबाजी माकXट, कमेला दरवाजा,
5354
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Rरंग रोड,
िजला – सूरत (गुजरात)
िपन - 395002
105
भारतीय टेट ब/क
अड़ाजन हिजरा रोड शाखा
शॉप नं- 3-4
टाइटेिनयम hेयर िब9डंग
वेटन3 कॉ8रडोर
िजला-सूरत (गुजरात)
िपन - 395009
106
भारतीय टेट ब/क
एसबीआई इनटच वीआईपी रोड शाखा
शॉप नं- 10-12 एवं 14
]ंगटा शॉ9पंग सटर, नंदनवन-2
वीआईपी रोड,
िजला- सूरत (गुजरात)
िपन – 395007
107
भारतीय टेट ब/क
Aयू िसटी लाईट रोड शाखा
शॉप नं – 8 से 11
इको Kयूचड3 भूतल,
अनुपम बंगला के सामने
Aयू िसटी लाइट सूरत
िजला-सूरत (गुजरात)
िपन - 395007
108
भारतीय टेट ब/क
9संगनापुर कॉजवे शाखा
शॉप नOबर- 1-4
िसवर टोन कॉजवे रोड
बी/एच कंठा8रया हनुमान मंदर,
9संगनापुर
िजला- सूरत (गुजरात)
िपन -395004
109
भारतीय टेट ब/क
वीआईपी रोड भरथना शाखा
भगवान महावीर एजूकेशन फाउंडेशन
िहना बंगेलोज के पीछे,
वीआईपी रोड
भरथना, भटार रोड
िजला – सूरत (गुजरात)
िपन - 395007
110
भारतीय टेट ब/क
aीन िसटी रोड पाल सूरत,
शॉप न- 1 से 6 भूतल,
िनशाल आकXड
aीन िसटी
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940
5355
िजला –सूरत (गुजरात)
िपन - 395009
111
भारतीय टेट ब/क
एलपी सवानी रोड शाखा
शॉप नं -07 वुड hेयर एल पी
िशवािलक िहस के सामने,
अडाजन
िजला- सूरत (गुजरात)
िपन - 395009
112
भारतीय टेट ब/क
उिमया मंदर शाखा
62/8, उपल टॉवर,
अिUन रोड
िजला- सूरत (गुजरात)
िपन - 3950009
113
भारतीय टेट ब/क
एसबीआइ इनटच कैनाल रोड़ शाखा
कैनाल रोड, भीमराड
शॉप नं- 39,
मै|स शॉ9पंग कॉOKलेQस
अलथान भीमराड
िजला- सूरत (गुजरात)
िपन - 395017
114
भारतीय टेट ब/क
लाजपोर शाखा
लाजपोर सWल जेल शॉ9पंग कॉOKलेQस
सिचन नवसारी रोड
िजला – सूरत (गुजरात)
िपन - 394235
115
भारतीय टेट ब/क
योगी चौक शाखा
भूतल शॉप नं- 34-39,
िलयोनाड3 hेयर-
वाितक Kलाजा के नजदीक
िजला-सूरत (गुजरात)
िपन - 395006
116
भारतीय टेट ब/क
9डंडोली शाखा
सी-11 से 20 माक3 Kवाइंट कॉOKलेQस
भूतल, 9डंडोली चार रा ता
9डंडोली
िजला-सूरत (गुजरात)
िपन - 394210
117
भारतीय टेट ब/क
खरचेिलया शाखा
अपर aाउंड लेवल,
जलाराम कॉOपलेQस. बावरी फिलया
5356
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
पोट खरचेिलया
तहसील- मbआ, िसटी- बारडोली
िजला- सूरत (गुजरात)
िपन - 394240
118
भारतीय टेट ब/क
रोनवेल शाखा
रोनवेल िवभाग कृषक सेवा सहकारी मंडी भवन
गेट नं. 445,
धरमपुर तहसीलदार काया3लय प8रसर
िजला-वलसाड (गुजरात)
िपन - 396055
119
भारतीय टेट ब/क
विशयार शाखा,
Kलॉट नं- 41,
तपोवन सोसायटी
कंWी कब के नजदीक,
अतुल रोड, विशयार
िजला- वलसाड (गुजरात)
िपन - 396007
120
भारतीय टेट ब/क
पारडी सांधपोर शाखा
भूतल, कैलाश िब9डंग
कैलाश रोड
िजला-वलसाड (गुजरात)
िपन - 396001
121
भारतीय टेट ब/क
एसबीआई इनटच वापी शाखा
शॉप नं-1 A ,
भूतल फॉचु3न मॉल
Kलॉट नंबर-66/67, वापी
रेसल माइ9नंग के सामने,
जीआईडीसी माइ9नंग
िजला-वलसाड (गुजरात)
िपन - 396195
122
भारतीय टेट ब/क
िसलवासा रोड शाखा
शॉप नं-13-17, भूतल
फॉचु3न hेयर-1, वापी
चलाला
िजला-वलसाड (गुजरात)
िपन - 396191
123
भारतीय टेट ब/क
धरमपुर रोड शाखा
ओम Kलाजा िब9डंग
धरमपुर रोड, अबरामा
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940
5357
िजला-वलसाड (गुजरात)
िपन - 396001
124
भारतीय टेट ब/क
ितcपती Kलाजा शाखा
शॉप नं- 15-19
ितcपित Kलाजा वापी-दमन रोड
चलाला, वापी
िजला – वलसाड (गुजरात)
िपन - 396191
125
भारतीय टेट ब/क
िजला सेवासदन शाखा
} यारा, भूतल,
िजला सेवासदन , पनवाड़ी
िजला- तापी (गुजरात)
िपन -394650
126
भारतीय टेट ब/क
जमालपोर शाखा
वेदांत अपाट3मट -2,
शॉप नं - 1 और 2
ितगरा जकातनाका,
ितगरावाड़ी रोड
िजला – नवसारी (गुजरात)
िपन – 396445
127
भारतीय टेट ब/क
अंबाड़ा शाखा
िनशाल फािलया
तहसील एवं पोट- नवसारी
गाँव – अबरामा
पदार बस टॉप
िजला – सूरत (गुजरात)
िपन - 396469
128
भारतीय टेट ब/क
एसबीआई इनटच
अडाजन सूरत शाखा,
शॉप नं. - G/2, भूतल,
}हाइट ओeच3ड,
शैल पेWोल पOप के पास,
एल.पी. सावनी रोड,
अडाजन रोड,
सूरत (गुजरात)
िपन -395009
5358
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Financial Services)
New Delhi, the 3rd August, 2018
S.O. 1318.—In pursuance of sub-rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for official purposes of the
Union) Rules, 1976 (as amended in 1987), the Central Government, hereby notifies the listed Offices/ Branches of State
Bank of India, more than 80% of the staff whereof have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi:-
Serial
No.
Name of the Bank
Number of Branches/Offices
1.
State Bank of India
128
Total
128
[F.No. 11016/2/2017-OL(Noti.)]
SHAILESH KUMAR SINGH, Jt. Director (OL)
STATE BANK OF INDIA, LOCAL HEAD OFFICE, AHMEDABAD LIST OF
OFFICES/BRANCHES TO BE NOTIFIED UNDER RULE 10(4)
OF OFFICIAL LANGUAGE RULES 1976
1.
State Bank of India
MCG Prahladnagar Branch
Shop No 5, First Floor
Indraprasth Corporate
Prahaladnagar
Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
PIN -380015
2.
State Bank of India
Mansi Circle – Vastrapur Branch
PRIMATE Ground Floor
Opp. Mother Milk Palace
Vastrapur
Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
PIN- 380015
3.
State Bank of India
Ellis Bridge – Ashram Road Branch
Ground Floor “ KAIVANA”
Ambavadi
Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
PIN – 380006
4
State Bank of India
RACPC Ashram Road
B/2 Ajanta Commercial Centre
Near Income Tax Circle
Ashram Road
Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
PIN– 380004
5.
State Bank of India
Krishamabaug Char Rasta
Mani Nagar Branch
Prime Plaza ,
Opp. Ravji Bhai Tower
Krishamabaug Char Rasta ,
Mani Nagar
Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
PIN -380008
6.
State Bank of India
Vasupunjya Chamber,
Ashram Road Branch
Shital Varsha II
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940
5359
Opp. Nathubhai Hospital
Usmanpura
Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
PIN - 380013
7.
State Bank of India
Parimal Garden Branch
Dev Complex,
Ground Floor
C. G . Road
Opp. Parimal Garden
Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
PIN -380006
8.
State Bank of India
Ramdevnagar Cross Road Branch
Iscon Park
Opp. Om Tower,
Satellite Road
Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
PIN - 380015
9.
State Bank of India
Science City West Branch
Saptak Corporate House
Near Shukan Mall
Science City Road, Sola
Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
PIN – 380060
10.
State Bank of India
Ring Road Bopal Branch
Shop No 1-7 Ground Floor
Amarapali Axiom
Near Bopal junction
Bopal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
PIN – 380058
11.
State Bank of India
Dhandhuka East Branch
Shop No. 51
Opp Rly. Station ,
Adavan Naka
Near Mamlatdar Office
Dhandhuka, Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
PIN – 382460
12.
State Bank of India
Mid Corporate C.G. Road Branch
Shop No. 1 & 2
Shukan Business Centre,
Ground Floor,
Swastik Char Rasta
Navrangpura, C.G. Road
Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
PIN – 380009
13.
State Bank of India
New C.G. Road Branch
Shop No. 29 to 34 Sarjan II
Sahara Co-op. Society Ground Floor
New C.G. Road
Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
PIN – 382424
14.
State Bank of India
SME Ashram Road Branch
Nagindas Chamber Ground Floor
Usmanpura, , Ashram Road
Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
PIN – 380014
5360
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
15.
State Bank of India
Jawahar Chowk – Maninagar Branch
Sakar Building,
Jawahar Chowk
Maninagar
Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
PIN – 380008
16.
State Bank of India
sbiINTOUCH Makarba Branch
Shri Kailash Harinarayan Agrawal
Safal Solitaire, B-7 Ground Floor
Makarba, S.G. Highway
Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
PIN – 380055
17.
State Bank of India
sbiINTOUCH
Ambawadi Branch
Ashwamegh Elegance
3 & 4, Ground Floor
Opp- Kalyan Jwellers,
Ambawadi Cross Road,
Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
PIN – 380015
18.
State Bank of India
sbiINTOUCH Motera Branch
4 D Square ,
82-83 Ground Floor
Opp. IIT Engineering College
Visit -Gandhinagar Highway
Motera
Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
PIN – 380005
19.
State Bank of India
sbiINTOUCH Prahladnagar Branch
“ Puspak” Ground Floor 7 & 8
Behind Syndicate Bank
Opp. Prahladnagar Garden
Satellite ,
Prahladnagar
Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
PIN – 380015
20.
State Bank of India
sbiINTOUCH Shivranjani Branch
“ Shivalik High Street”
Ground Floor -3 A,B,C,D
Near Keshavbaug Party Plot
Shivranjani, Vastrapur
Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
PIN – 380015
21.
State Bank of India
sbiINTOUCH C.G. Road Branch
Olive Arcade Ground Floor -2
Near Grish Cold Drink Cross Road
Off C.G. Road
Navrangpura
Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
PIN – 380006
22.
State Bank of India
Malvan Chowkdy Branch
Village : Malvan
Tal : Dasada
Dist: Surendranagar (Gujarat)
PIN – 382745
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940
5361
23.
State Bank of India
Vande Matram Gota Branch
N Y Square, Plot No. 253/4
Near Ganesh Skyline
Opp. Vrindavan Height
Chenpur, Gota
Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
PIN – 382481
24.
State Bank of India
Motera Koteshvar Road Branch
Shop No. 5 to 8, Dev Pride
Ground Floor,
Near Atishay Tower Residency
Motera, Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
PIN – 380005
25.
State Bank of India
S P Ring Road Shilaj
Chowkadi Branch
‘A’ Square,
Ground Floor Shop No. 3 to 8
Shilaj Cross Road
Shilaj , Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
PIN -380059
26.
State Bank of India
Chosar Road Jetalpur Branch
Chosar Road Opp. NSIT College
Jetalpur, Tal : Deskroi
Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
PIN – 382427
27.
State Bank of India
Vatva Branch
Ashapuri Residence
Ground Floor Shop No 21 to 25
Mahalaxmi Corner
Near Vidya Sarita School , Vatva
Village : Vatva
Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
PIN – 382440
28.
State Bank of India
Ghanad Branch
Village : Ghanad
Taluka : Lakhtar
Dist : Surendranagar (Gujarat)
PIN – 363110
29.
State Bank of India
Shastrinagar Branch
Shivalik Yash Complex
Grond Floor Shop No. 2 & 3
Opp. Shastrinagar BRTS Bus Stand
132 Ring Road
Naryanpura
Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
PIN -380013
30.
State Bank of India
Gurukul Road Branch Dhangadra
Shivam Complex
Opp. Shiv Shakti Honda Agency
Near –Bhagvat Dham
Halvad Road
Dhrangadra
Dist : Surendranagar (Gujarat)
PIN – 363310
5362
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
31.
State Bank of India
Sector 22 Branch,
Plot No.718, Main Shopping Centre,
Behind Panchdev Mandir,
Sector – 22,
Gandhinagar (Gujrat)
Pin – 382022
32.
State Bank of India
Bhat Air Port Road Branch,
Shree Swaminarayan Vishranti Bhuvan,
Near Appolo Hospital,
Bhat, Dist. Gandhinagar (Gujrat)
Pin 382428
33.
State Bank of India
Suman Tower Branch,
Plot No. 17, Cinemax Complex,
Suman City, Sector-11,
Gandhinagar
Dist. Gandhinagar (Gujarat)
Pin 382011
34.
State Bank of India,
sbiINTOUCH Infocity Gandhinagar,
I T Tower No. 1, Ground Floor,
Infocity Complex, Air Port Road,
Gandhinagar
Dist. Gandhinagar (Gujarat)
Pin 382009
35.
State Bank of India
College Road Mehsana Branch,
1st Floor,
Jaidev Complex,
Opp.Pashabhai Petrol Pump,
Highway Road,
Mehsana (Gujarat)
Pin - 384002
36.
State Bank of India
Highway Road Branch,
Survey 657,
Near H.P. Petrol Pump,
Opp. Gram Panchayat Office,
Highway, Bechraji
Distt. Mehsana (Gujarat)
Pin 384210
37.
State Bank of India,
Modhera Road Branch,
Gokul Meridian,
Near Tahuko Party Plot,
Modhera Road
Mehsana
Dist. Mehsana- (Gujarat)
Pin - 384002
38.
State Bank of India,
sbiINTOUCH Branch,
Orbit Business Hub,
Shop No. 1 To 6,
Near Dena Bank,
Radhanpur Road
Mehsana (Gujarat)
Pin 384002
39.
State Bank of India,
Sahakari Jin Road Branch,
Uma Complex, Plot No. 9 -10,
Rajmahel Society, Sahakari Jin Road,
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940
5363
Himatnagar
Dist.Sabarkantha (Gujarat)
Pin - 383001
40.
State Bank of India,
Punsari Branch,
Punsari, Tal. Talod.
Dist. Sabarkantha, (Gujarat)
Pin - 383307
41.
State Bank of India
Ahmedabad Highway Palanpur Branch,
1, 2 & 25 Laxmi Vishnu Complex,
Near Gathaman Patiya,
Palanpur,
Dist. Banaskantha (Gujarat)
Pin - 385001
42.
State Bank of India
Shankheshwar Branch,
Radhe Shopping Centre,
Show Room- Q (GF & FF),
Shankheshwar
Dist. Patan (Gujarat)
Pin - 384246
43.
State Bank of India,
Akhol Chowkdi Branch,
Besides Cobra Factory,
Dhanera Road,
Akhol Chowkdi,
Ta. Deesa
Dist. Banaskantha (Gujarat)
Pin - 385535
44.
State Bank of India,
Khatraj Chowkdi Branch,
Plot No. 949, Property No. 1653,
Khatraj Chowkdi,
Mahudha Road,
Mehmdabad
Dist. Kheda (Gujarat)
Pin - 387130
45.
State Bank of India
Malpur Road Branch,
3B-4B, Kartikey Soceity,
Malpur Road,
Modasa
Dist. Aravalli (Gujarat)
Pin - 383315
46.
State Bank of India,
sbiINTOUCH Uttarsanda Branch,
22 to 25, ‘L’ Square Building,
Uttarsanda Road, Opp D-Mart
Nadiad
Dist. Kheda (Gujarat)
Pin - 387001
47.
State Bank of India
New Kothariya Road Branch
Radhey Complex
Opp. Sardar Gas Agency,
Rolex Road
Kothariya Rajkot
Dist : Rajkot (Gujarat)
Pin - 360022
48.
State Bank of India
Sterling Hospital Area Branch
"Time Square"
5364
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Ayodhya Chawk,
150 Feet Ring Road,
Dist : Rajkot (Gujarat)
Pin - 360007
49.
State Bank of India
P D Malaviya Fatak Branch
Shop No. 1-4, Sunrise Apartment
Opp Jasani School,
Gondal Road
Rajkot
Dist : Rajkot (Gujarat)
Pin - 360004
50.
State Bank of India
Ramdham Plot Branch
Mangal Kiran
Ramdham Plot,
Kalawad Road
Rajkot,Gujarat
Dist : Rajkot (Gujarat)
Pin - 360005
51.
State Bank of India
Vaniyavadi Branch
Dholaria's". Vania Wadi
Gayatrinagar Main Road
Opp. Radheshyam Dairy Farm - Rajkot
Dist : Rajkot (Gujarat)
Pin – 360001
52.
State Bank of India
sbiINTOUCH Branch
Kalawad Road
"Business Bay", Shop No.1 & 2
Opp. Punjab Honda, Kalawad Road
Dist : Rajkot (Gujarat)
Pin – 360005
53.
State Bank of India
Jetpar Branch
At & Post- Jetpar (Machhu)
Jetpar Aniyari Road,
Jetpar
Dist : Morbi (Gujarat)
Pin – 363630
54.
State Bank of India
Janta Fatak Branch
1st Floor, Kanku Complex
Janta Fatak Jamnagar
Dist: Jamnagar (Gujarat)
Pin : 361006
55.
State Bank of India
Kenedy Branch
Kenedy Village
Taluka : Kalyanpur
Via : Bhatia,
Dist : Devbhumi Dwarka (Gujarat)
Pin – 361315
56.
State Bank of India
Satapar Branch
Taluka - Jamjodhpur
Dist : Jamnagar (Gujarat)
Pin – 360531
57.
State Bank of India
sbiINTOUCH Branch
G-1, Platinum Square,
Park Colony,
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940
5365
Near Jogger's Par
Dist : Jamnagar
Gujarat
Pin – 361008
58.
State Bank of India
SBI Reliance Circle Branch
Shop No. 112-113,
Friend's Square
Plot No. 2&3, Ward -6,
Rotary Circle
Tagore Road
Gandhidham (Kutch)
Dist : Kutch (Gujarat)
Pin – 370201
59.
State Bank of India
Subhashnagar Char Rasta Branch
Plot No 8 , D/C-2
Subhashnagar Main Road
Near Gurukul,
Gandhidham
Dist : Kutch (Gujarat)
Pin – 370201
60.
State Bank of India
Soni Bazar Gandhidham Branch
1st Floor, Plot No. 271,
Ward 12-B,
Gandhidham
Dist : Kutch (Gujarat)
Pin – 370201
61.
State Bank of India
sbiINTOUCH Branch
Bhagwati Arcade
Plot No. 2, Sector 9,
Opp BSNL,
Tagore Road
Gandhidham
Dist : Kutch (Gujarat)
Pin – 370201
62.
State Bank of India
Marketing Yard Gondal Branch
Premises of Shree Geeta Battery Service
Opp New Marketing Yard
Gundala Chowkdi,
Gondal
Dist.: Rajkot (Gujarat)
Pin – 360311
63.
State Bank of India
Sandipani Branch
District & Session Court Building
Sandipani Road
Dist.: Porbandar (Gujarat)
Pin – 360578
64.
State Bank of India
R.C. Dutt Road Branch,
103, B.N. Chambers,
R.C. Dutt Road,
Vadodara (Gujarat)
Pin – 390007
65.
State Bank of India
Moxi Branch,
Ground Floor,
Chora Valu Faliyu,
Near Shiv Bal Mandir,
5366
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Village Mokshi,
Taluka Savli
Vadodara (Gujarat)
Pin - 391780
66.
State Bank of India
Chakli Circle Branch,
Bhagwat Niwas,
Chakli Circle,
Near GEB Baroda,
Vadodar (Gujarat)
Pin - 390007
67.
State Bank of India
Jetalpur Road Branch,
19-25, Glacier Complex,
Jetalpur Road,
Vadodara (Gujarat),
Pin - 390007
68.
State Bank of India
sbiINTOUCH Akota Branch,
G-2, Peridot Hub,
Urmi Crossing,
Malhar Pol,
Vadodara (Gujarat)
Pin - 390007
69.
State Bank of India
District Court Branch,
26/27, Vrajwadi Complex,
Near Ward No. 11,
Sainath Marg, New Court Road,
Diwalipura,
Vadodara (Gujarat)
Pin - 390015
70.
State Bank of India
Nilambar Circle Branch,
Shop No. 1 to 8,
Earth Artica,
Near Hanumanji Temple,
Vasna Bhayli Road,
Vadodara (Gujarat)
Pin - 391410
71.
State Bank of India
Somatalav Branch,
Shop No. 1 to 8,
Kanha Heights,
Somatalav-Dabhoi Road,
Vadodara (Gujarat)
Pin - 390025
72.
State Bank of India
Shubhanpura Branch,
Vimalnath Complex Plaza,
Shubhanpura High Tension Road,
Vadodara (Gujarat),
Pin - 390007
73.
State Bank of India
Jalaram Mandir Branch,
11-12, Shiv Shakti Co.
Op. Housing Society,
Jalaram Temple Road,
Karelibaug,
Vadodara (Gujarat)
Pin - 390018
74.
State Bank of India
sbiINTOUCH Sama Savli Branch,
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940
5367
GF 36-37, Lotus Aura,
Opp. Lilleria Party Plot,
Near IOC Petrol Pump,
Vadodara (Gujarat)
Pin - 390024
75.
State Bank of India
sbiINTOUCH Fatehganj Branch,
Ground Floor, Eagle Appt.
Fatehganj Main Road,
Vadodara (Gujarat)
Pin - 390002
76.
State Bank of India
New VIP Road Branch,
Sakar Complex,
Near Sardar Estate,
New VIP Road,
Vadodara (Gujarat)
Pin - 390019
77.
State Bank of India
Mahuvad Branch,
Om Complex,
Shop No. 24 & 25,
Mahuvad Chowkdi,
Village Mahuvad,
Taluka Padra,
Vadodara (Gujarat)
Pin - 391440
78.
State Bank of India
Masar Road Branch,
Main Market Road,
Masar Road,
Taluka Padra,
Dist. Vadodara (Gujarat)
Pin - 391421
79.
State Bank of India
College Road Branch,
C/8, Shrinivas Housing Society,
Opp. Civil Court,
Sinor Road, Dabhoi ,
Dist. Vadodara (Gujarat),
Pin - 391110
80.
State Bank of India
Kanjari Road Branch,
Nilkanth Avenue,
12 Mangalam Park,
Kanjari Road, Halol,
Dist. Panchmahals, (Gujarat)
Pin - 389350
81.
State Bank of India
Kadana Branch,
Door No. 318 at Diwada Chowkdi,
Kadana,
Village- Bhemasar,
Taluka – Kadana,
Mahisagar (Gujarat),
Pin – 389250
82.
State Bank of India
Chikhodara Branch,
Moto Vando,
Near Baithak Mandir,
Chikhodara,
Anand (Gujarat),
Pin - 388320
5368
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
83.
State Bank of India
Ode Branch,
Sal Va Khada,
Near Big Milk Dairy,
Main Bazar,
Taluka – Ode,
Anand (Gujarat),
Pin - 388210
84.
State Bank of India
Jitodia Road Branch,
Maruti Spand,
Opp. Akruti Nagar,
Anand-Jitodia Road,
Anand (Gujarat),
Pin - 388001
85.
State Bank of India
Bhadran Branch,
Sona Tekri,
Near Bus Stand,
Bhadran, Anand (Gujarat),
Pin – 388530
86.
State Bank of India
RACPC, 1st Floor,
SBI Sayajiganj Branch Building,
Opp. Aradhana Cinema,
Sayajiganj,
Vadodara (Gujarat),
Pin - 390001
87.
State Bank of India
sbiINTOUCH Branch
G-5, Sun Hormony
Fulwadi Chowk,
Hill Drive
Bhavnagar (Gujarat)
Pin - 364 002
88.
State Bank of India
Ring Road Branch
Shop No. 16-19,
The Capital
150 Feet Ring Road,
Top Three Circle
Bhavnagar (Gujarat)
Pin - 364 002
89.
State Bank of India
CAC Branch
1st Floor, Neelambaug Chowk
Bhavnagar (Gujarat)
Pin - 364 001
90.
State Bank of India
Trapaj Branch
Alang Road,
Beside Primary School
Tahsil Talaja
Dist. Bhavnagar (Gujarat)
Pin - 364 150
91.
State Bank of India
Akala Branch
Gram Panchayat Bhavan
Tahsil Lathi
Dist. Amreli (Gujarat)
Pin - 365 430
92.
State Bank of India
Galkotdi Branch
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940
5369
NH 136, Near Ramji Mandir
School Street
Tahsil Babara
Dist. Amreli (Gujarat)
Pin - 365 421
93.
State Bank of India
sbiINTOUCH Branch
Ground Floor,
Millenium Arcade
Janjharda Bypass Chowk
Dist. Junagadh (Gujarat)
Pin - 362001
94.
State Bank of India
Valasimdi Branch
Tahsil Junagadh
Dist. Junagadh (Gujarat)
Pin - 362 011
95.
State Bank of India
Jangar Branch
Tahsil Maliya
Dist. Junagadh (Gujarat)
Pin - 362 255
96.
State Bank of India
Khandheri Branch
Khandheri Main Market
Dist. Gir Somnath (Gujarat)
Pin - 362 150
97.
State Bank of India
Umarwada Branch
16/1, Vania Faliyu
Village - Umarwada
Taluka- Ankleshwar
Dist - Bharuch (Gujarat)
Pin – 393001
98.
State Bank of India
Lakhi Branch
Dahej SEZ - 2
Administrative Office Complex,
Lakhigam, Taluka-Vagra
Dist - Bharuch (Gujarat)
Pin - 392002
99.
State Bank of India
Selamba Branch
Ambe Green City,
Near APMC
Gotpada, Selamba
Dist - Narmada (Gujarat)
Pin - 393025
100.
State Bank of India
Umraj Branch
Shop No.5, Acropolis,
Dahej Bypass Road,
Village Umraj
Dist- Bharuch (Gujarat)
Pin - 392001
101.
State Bank of India
Majura Gate Branch
Geeta Prabha Complex,
Majura Gate
Near Kadiwala School
Ring Road
Dist - Surat (Gujarat)
Pin - 395002
5370
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
102.
State Bank of India
Sheetal Shopping Centre Branch
1-3, First Floor,
Sheetal Shopping Square,
Turning Point,
Bhatar Road, Surat (Gujarat)
Pin - 395001
103.
State Bank of India
Siddhi Residency Branch
Shop No. 13-14,
Siddhi Residency,
New Pal Road,
Pal-Adajan , Tahsil- Chorsi
Dist – Surat (Gujarat)
Pin - 394510
104.
State Bank of India
Ambaji Market Branch
Ambaji market,
Kamela Darwaja,
Ring Road,
Dist – Surat (Gujarat)
Pin - 395002
105.
State Bank of India
Adajan Hajira Road
Shop No. 3 & 4,
Titanium Square Building
Western Corridor
Dist – Surat (Gujarat)
Pin- 395009
106.
State Bank of India
sbiINTOUCH VIP Road Branch
Shop-10 to 12 &14,
Roongta Shopping Centre,
Nandanvan- 2,
VIP Road,
Dist – Surat (Gujarat)
Pin - 395007
107.
State Bank of India
New City Light Road Branch
Shop No. 8 to 11,
Eco Futurz,
Ground floor
Opp- Anupam Bunglows
New City Light Road
Surat (Gujarat)
Pin - 395007
108.
State Bank of India
Singanpur Causway Branch
Shop 1 to 4,
Silver Stone Causway Road
Behind- Kantharia Hanuman Temple
Singanpur
Dist – Surat (Gujarat)
Pin – 395004
109.
State Bank of India
VIP Road Bharthana Branch
Bhagwan Mahavir Education Foundation
Behind Heena Bunglows,
Bharthana Bhatar Road
Dist – Surat (Gujarat)
Pin - 395007
110.
State Bank of India
Green City Road Pal Branch
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940
5371
Shop No. 1 to 6,
Ground Floor
Nishal Arcade,
Green City
Dist – Surat (Gujarat)
Pin – 395009
111.
State Bank of India
L P Savani Road Branch
Shop No.7 Wood Square L P
Opp- Shivalikhles Hills
Adajan
Dist – Surat (Gujarat)
Pin – 395009
112.
State Bank of India
Umiya Mandir Branch
62/8 Uppal Tower
Ashwin Road
Dist – Surat (Gujarat)
Pin – 395006
113.
State Bank of India
sbiINTOUCH
Cenal Road Branch
Shop No. 39,
Magnus Shopping Complex,
Althan Bhimrad
Dist – Surat (Gujarat)
Pin - 395017
114..
State Bank of India
Lajpore Branch
Lajpore Central Jail Shopping Complex
Sachin - Navsari Road
Dist – Surat (Gujarat)
Pin - 394235
115.
State Bank of India
Yogi Chowk Branch
Shop No. 34 to 39
leonard square
Near- Swastik Plaza,
Dist – Surat (Gujarat)
Pin – 395006
116.
State Bank of India
Dindoli Branch
C-11 to C-20
Mark Point Complex,
Ground Floor
Dindoli Char Rasta
Dindoli
Dist – Surat (Gujarat)
Pin - 394210
117.
State Bank of India
Karcheliya Branch
Upper ground Level
Jalaram Complex
Bavri falia
Post - Karcheliya,
Tahsil – Mahuva
City - Bardoli
Dist – Surat (Gujarat)
Pin - 394240
118.
State Bank of India
Ronvel Branch
Ronvel Vibhag
Khedut Seva Sahkari Mandi Bhavan
5372
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Gate No. 445,
Dharampur Mamalatdar Kacheri Compound
Dist - Valsad (Gujarat)
Pin - 396055
119.
State Bank of India
Vashiyar Branch
Plot No. 41,
Tapovan Society
Near Country Club,
Atul Road
Vashiyar
Dist - Valsad (Gujarat)
Pin - 396007
120.
State Bank of India
Pardi Sandhpore Branch
Ground Floor,
Kailash Apartment,
Kailash Road
Pardi Sandhpor
Dist - Valsad (Gujarat)
Pin - 396001
121.
State Bank of India
sbiINTOUCH Vapi Branch
Shop No. 1 A , Ground Floor,
Fortune Mall,
Plot No. 66/67, Vapi
Opp-Resal Mining,
GIDC Mining
Dist - Valsad (Gujarat)
Pin - 396195
122.
State Bank of India
Silwasa Road Branch
Shop No. 13-17,
Ground Floor
Fortune Square-1, Vapi
Chala
Dist - Valsad (Gujarat)
Pin - 396191
123.
State Bank of India
Dharampur Road Branch
Om Plaza Building
Dharampur Road
Abrama
Dist – Valsad (Gujarat)
Pin - 396001
124.
State Bank of India
Tirupati Plaza Branch
Shop No. 15-19
Tirupati Plaza Vapi-Daman Road
Chala - Vapi
Dist - Valsad (Gujarat)
Pin - 396191
125.
State Bank of India
Jilla Seva Sadan Branch
Vyara
Jilla Seva Sadan Campus,
Panwadi , Dist - Tapi (Gujarat)
Pin - 394650
126.
State Bank of India
Jamalpore Branch,
Vedant Apartment-2,
Shop No. 1 & 2
Tigara Jakat Naka,
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940
5373
Tigrawadi Road
Dist - Navsari (Gujarat)
Pin - 396445
127.
State Bank of India
Ambada Branch,
Nishal Falia,
Tahsil & Post- Navsari
Village - Abrama
Dist - Navsari (Gujarat)
Pin – 396469
128.
State Bank of India
sbiINTOUCH Adajan,
Surat Branch
Shop No. G/2, Ground Floor,
White Orchid,
Near Shell Petrol Pump,
L P Savani Road,
Adajan Road Surat,
Dist – Surat (Gujarat)
Pin – 395009
नई दली, 3 अग त, 2018
का.आ
का.आ
का.आ
का.आ. 1319
1319
1319
1319.—कीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासकय योजन के िलए योग) िनयम, 1976 (1987 म यथा संशोिधत)
के िनयम 10 के उप िनयम (4) के अनुसरण म भारतीय टेट ब/क के सूचीब2 काया3लय/शाखा5 को अिधसूिचत करती है, िजनके 80% से
अिधक कम3चा8रय ने 9हंदी का काय3साधक :ान ा; कर िलया है : -
<.सं.
ब/क का नाम
शाखा5/काया3लय क सं>या
1.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
30
कुल
कुल
कुल
कुल
30
30
30
30
[फा.सं. 11016/2/2017-9हं.(अिध.)]
शैलेश कुमार 9संह, संयु? िनदेशक (राजभाषा)
राजभाषा िनयम, 1976 के िनयम 10(4) के अंतगत भारत सरकार के राजप म3
राजभाषा िनयम, 1976 के िनयम 10(4) के अंतगत भारत सरकार के राजप म3
राजभाषा िनयम, 1976 के िनयम 10(4) के अंतगत भारत सरकार के राजप म3
राजभाषा िनयम, 1976 के िनयम 10(4) के अंतगत भारत सरकार के राजप म3
अिधसूिचत करने के िलए कायालय# क' सूची
अिधसूिचत करने के िलए कायालय# क' सूची
अिधसूिचत करने के िलए कायालय# क' सूची
अिधसूिचत करने के िलए कायालय# क' सूची
1
भारतीय टेट ब/क
अमरावती थानीय
धान काया3लय
गनफ~Yी
हैदराबाद – 500001
तेलंगाना
2
भारतीय टेट ब/क
शासिनक काया3लय
26-1-52, कावारीतोटा, नगरमपालेम
गुAटूर – 522 004
आं^ देश
3
भारतीय टेट ब/क
ेdीय Gवसाय काया3लय,
गुंटूर शहरी
5374
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
एस.बी.आई. Wेजरी शाखा के ऊपर,
2/14 Dोिडपेट
गुंटूर – 522 002
आं^ देश
4
भारतीय टेट ब/क
ेdीय Gवसाय काया3लय,
गुंटूर aामीण
ल[मीपुरम मेन रोड
गुंटूर – 522 006
आं^ देश
5
भारतीय टेट ब/क
ेdीय Gवसाय काया3लय,
नरसारावपेट
एस.बी.आई. - पी&एस शाखा के ऊपर,
अcंडेलपेट
नरसरावपेट – 522 601
आं^ देश
6
भारतीय टेट ब/क
ेdीय Gवसाय काया3लय,
5गोल, दूसरा ताल,
उषोदया कॉOKलेQस
कनू3ल रोड,
5गोल – 523 002
आं^ देश
7
भारतीय टेट ब/क
ेdीय Gवसाय काया3लय,
तेनाली
मुनुवामी नायडू Wीट,
गांधी चौक
तेनाली – 522 201
आं^ देश
8
भारतीय टेट ब/क
आर.ए.सी.पी.सी.
कावारी तोटा, नगरमपालेम
गुAटूर – 522 004
आं^ देश
9
भारतीय टेट ब/क
एस.एम.ई.सी.सी.,
ई.एस.आई. अपताल के समीप,
कृMणानगर
गुंटूर – 522 007
आं^ देश
10
भारतीय टेट ब/क
शासिनक काया3लय
दूसरी मंिज़ल, कृMणा कॉOKलेQस
गायdी एटेट
कनू3ल – 518002
आं^ देश
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940
5375
11
भारतीय टेट ब/क
ेdीय Gवसाय काया3लय ,
ेd-1, अनंतपुर शहरी
पहली मंिज़ल,
एस.बी.आई. िब9डंग
सा नगर
अनंतपुर – 515001
आं^ देश
12
भारतीय टेट ब/क
ेdीय Gवसाय काया3लय,
ेd-2, अनंतपुर aामीण
पहली मंिज़ल,
एम.एस. देवी कॉOKलेQस
गुfी रोड
अनंतपुर – 515001
आं^ देश
13
भारतीय टेट ब/क
ेdीय Gवसाय काया3लय ,
ेd-3, कनू3ल शहरी
मकान सं.: 45-203- ए 55,
तीसरी मंिज़ल
िवMणु सा एAQलेव
मैन रोड, वी.आर कॉलोनी
कनू3ल- 518003
आं^ देश
14
भारतीय टेट ब/क
ेdीय Gवसाय काया3लय ,
ेd-4 , कनू3ल aामीण
मकान सं.: 42/224 & 225
एन.आर पेट, मैन रोड
कनू3ल- 518002
आं^ देश
15
भारतीय टेट ब/क
ेdीय Gवसाय काया3लय
ेd-1 (कड़पा शहरी)
1/705, qारका नगर
कड़पा-516 004
आं^ देश
16
भारतीय टेट ब/क
ेdीय Gवसाय काया3लय
ेd-2 (कड़पा aामीण)
एस.बी.आई. मु>य शाखा, पहला माला
सेवन रोsस सक3 ल
कड़पा-516 001,
आं^ देश
5376
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
17
भारतीय टेट ब/क
ेdीय Gवसाय काया3लय
ेd-3 (ितcपित शहरी)
सहजा टॉवस3, तीसरा तल
रेिनगुंटा रोड
ितcपित-517 501
आं^ देश
18
भारतीय टेट ब/क
ेdीय Gवसाय काया3लय
ेd-4 (ितcपित aामीण)
सहजा टॉवस3, चौथा तल
रेिनगुंटा रोड
ितcपित-517 501
आं^ देश
19
भारतीय टेट ब/क
ेdीय Gवसाय काया3लय
ेd-5 (नेलूर)
अिनकट रोड, रंगनायकुलापेट
नेलूर-524 003
आं^ देश
20
भारतीय टेट ब/क,
ेdीय Gवसाय काया3लय (सWल),
ेd -1, िस8रपुरम,
बालाजीनगर,
िवशाखापनम - 530001
आं^ देश
21
भारतीय टेट ब/क,
ेdीय Gवसाय काया3लय(aामीण),
ेd -2, िसरीपुरम,
बालाजीनगर,
िवशाखापनम - 530001
आं^ देश
22
भारतीय टेट ब/क,
ेdीय Gवसाय काया3लय
(अध3 शहरी),
ेd -3, िसरीपुरम,
बालाजीनगर,
िवशाखापनम - 530001
आं^ देश
23
भारतीय टेट ब/क,
ेdीय Gवसाय काया3लय,
ेd -4, दूसरी मंिजल,
Fी पावती कयाण मंडप के ऊपर,
पेदपाडु रोड,
Fीकाकुलम-532001,
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940
5377
Fीकाकुलम िजला
आं^ देश
24
भारतीय टेट ब/क,
ेdीय Gवसाय काया3लय,
ेd -5, अलकनAदा कॉलोनी,
कांटोनमट ए8रया,
िवजयनगरम 535003
िवजयनगरम िजला
आं^ देश
25
भारतीय टेट ब/क
शासिनक काया3लय
टेट ब/क Q वेयर
कO बाला चेcवु
राजमहवरम – 533105
आं^ देश
26
भारतीय टेट ब/क
ेdीय } यवसाय काया3लय (शहरी)
46-12-24, मौिनका K लाज़ा
दानावाईपेटा
राजमहवरम – 533101
आं^ देश
27
भारतीय टेट ब/क
ेdीय } यवसाय काया3लय (aामीण)
6-2-2, िqतीय तल,
रवीA भारती
टी.नगर, इA नीसपेटा
राजमहवरम – 533101
आं^ देश
28
भारतीय टेट ब/क
ेdीय } यवसाय काया3लय
मकान सं>या : 1-175, ए.जी. रोड
अमलापुरम – 533201
आं^ देश
29
भारतीय टेट ब/क
ेdीय } यवसाय काया3लय
11-4-7, िqतीय तल
नूकालO मा मंदर के सामने
रामारावपेटा
काकनाड़ा – 533004
आं^ देश
30
भारतीय टेट ब/क
ेdीय } यवसाय काया3लय
थम तल,
मकान सं>या 3-19-8/9,
भूपाल K लाज़ा, भूपाल नगर
भाM यम कूल के समीप
ताडेप लीगुडेम – 534104
आं^ देश
5378
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
New Delhi, the 3rd August, 2018
S.O. 1319.—In pursuance of sub-rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for official purposes of the
Union) Rules, 1976 (as amended in 1987), the Central Government, hereby notifies the listed Offices/Branches of State
Bank of India, more than 80% of the staff whereof have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi:-
Serial
No.
Name of the Bank
Number of Branches/Offices
1.
State Bank of India
30
Total
30
[F.No.11016/2/2017-OL(Noti.)]
SHAILESH KUMAR SINGH, Jt. Director (OL)
LIST OF OFFICES TO BE NOTIFIED IN GOVT.OF INDIA GAZETTE UNDER
RULE 10(4) OF OFFICIAL LANGUAGE RULES, 1976
1
State Bank of India
Amaravati Local Head Office
Gunfoundry
Hyderabad – 500001
Telangana
2
State Bank of India
Administrative Office,
26-1-52, Kannavarithota,
Nagarampalem
Guntur – 522 004
Andhra Pradesh
3
State Bank of India
Regional Business Office,
Guntur Urban
Upstairs of SBI Treasury Branch,
2/14 Brodipet,
Guntur – 522 002
Andhra Pradesh
4
State Bank of India
Regional Business Office,
Guntur Rural,
Laxmipuram Main Road,
Guntur – 522 006
Andhra Pradesh
5
State Bank of India
Regional Business Office,
Narsaraopet
Upstairs of SBI P&S Branch,
Arundelpet
Narasaraopet – 522 601
Andhra Pradesh
6
State Bank of India
Regional Business Office,
Ongole , Second Floor,
Ushodaya Complex
Kurnool Road,
Ongole – 523 002
Andhra Pradesh
7
State Bank of India
Regional Business Office, Tenali
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940
5379
Munuswamy Naidu Street,
Gandhi Chowk
Tenali – 522 201
Andhra Pradesh
8
State Bank of India
R.A.C.P.C.
Kannavarithota,
Nagarampalem
Guntur – 522 004
Andhra Pradesh
9
State Bank of India
S.M.E.C.C.
Near E.S.I. Hospital,
Krishnanagar
Guntur – 522 007
Andhra Pradesh
10
STATE BANK OF INDIA
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE
2ND FLOOR, KRISHNA COMPLEX
GAYATRI ESTATES
KURNOOL- 518002
ANDHRA PRADESH
11
STATE BANK OF INDIA,
REGIONAL BUSINESS OFFICE,
REGION-1, ANANTAPUR URBAN
1 ST FLOOR SBI BUILDING,
SAI NAGAR,
ANANTAPUR-515001
ANDHRA PRADESH
12
STATE BANK OF INDIA
REGIONAL BUSINESS OFFICE,
REGION-2,
ANANTAPUR RURAL
1 ST FLOOR,
M.S DEVI COMPLEX
GOOTY ROAD
ANATAPUR -515001
ANDHRA PRADESH
13
STATE BANK OF INDIA
REGIONAL BUSINESS OFFICE,
REGION-3, KURNOOL URBAN
DNO : 45-203-A55, 3 RD FLOOR
VISHNU SAI ENCLAVE
MAIN ROAD, V. R. COLONY
KURNOOL-518003
ANDHRA PRADESH
14
STATE BANK OF INDIA,
REGIONAL BUSINESS OFFICE,
REGION-4, KURNOOL RURAL
DNO : 42/224 & 225
N R PET , MAIN ROAD
KURNOOL-518002
ANDHRA PRADESH
15
STATE BANK OF INDIA
REGIONAL BUSINESS OFFICE
REGION-1 (KADAPA URBAN)
1/705, DWARAKA NAGAR
KADAPA-516 004
ANDHRA PRADESH
5380
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
16
STATE BANK OF INDIA
|REGIONAL BUSINESS OFFICE
REGION-2 (KADAPA RURAL)
SBI MAIN BRANCH, 1ST FLOOR
SEVEN ROADS CIRCLE
KADAPA-516 001
ANDHRA PRADESH
17
STATE BANK OF INDIA
REGIONAL BUSINESS OFFICE
REGION-3 (TIRUPATI URBAN)
SAHAJA TOWERS, 3RD FLOOR
RENIGUNTA ROAD
TIRUPATI-517 501
ANDHRA PRADESH
18
STATE BANK OF INDIA
REGIONAL BUSINESS OFFICE
REGION-4 (TIRUPATI RURAL)
SAHAJA TOWERS, 4TH FLOOR
RENIGUNTA ROAD
TIRUPATI-517 501
ANDHRA PRADESH
19
STATE BANK OF INDIA
REGIONAL BUSINESS OFFICE
REGION-5 (NELLORE)
ANICUT ROAD, RANGANAYAKULAPET
NELLORE-524 003
ANDHRA PRADESH
20
State Bank of India,
Regional Business Office (Central),
Region-1,
Siripuram,
Balajinagar,
Visakhapatnam 530001
Andhra Pradesh
21
State Bank of India,
Regional Business Office (Rural),
Region-2, Siripuram,
Balajinagar,
Visakhapatnam 530001
Visakhapatnam District
Andhra Pradesh
22
State Bank of India,
Regional Business Office
(Semi Urban),
Region-3, Siripuram,
Balajinagar,
Visakhapatnam 530001
Andhra Pradesh
23
State Bank of India,
Regional Business Office,
Region-4, 2nd Floor,
Upstairs of Shri Padmavati Kalyana Mandap,
Pedapadu Road,
Srikakulam 532001
Srikakulam District
Andhra Pradesh
24
State Bank of India,
Regional Business Office,
Region-5,
Alakananda Colony,
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940
5381
Cantonment Area,
Vizianagaram 530001
Vizianagaram District
Andhra Pradesh
25
STATE BANK OF INDIA
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE
STATE BANK SQUARE
KAMBALA CHERUVU
RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM -533105
ANDHRA PRADESH
26
STATE BANK OF INDIA
REGIONAL BUSINESS OFFICE (URBAN)
46-12-24, MOUNIKA PLAZA
DANAVAIPETA
RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM -533101
ANDHRA PRADESH
27
STATE BANK OF INDIA
REGIONAL BUSINESS OFFICE (RURAL)
6-6-2, SECOND FLOOR
RAVINDRA BHARATI
T.NAGAR, INNESPETA
RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM -533101
ANDHRA PRADESH
28
STATE BANK OF INDIA
REGIONAL BUSINESS OFFICE
D.NO.1-175, A G ROAD
AMALAPURAM – 533201
ANDHRA PRADESH
29
STATE BANK OF INDIA
REGIONAL BUSINESS OFFICE
11-4-7, SECOND FLOOR
NEAR NUKALAMMA TEMPLE
RAMARAOPETA
KAKINADA – 533004
ANDHRA PRADESH
30
STATE BANK OF INDIA
REGIONAL BUSINESS OFFICE
FIRST FLOOR, D.NO.3-19-8/9
BHUPAL PLAZA, BHUPAL NAGAR
NEAR BHASHYAM SCHOOL
TADEPALLIGUDEM - 534104
ANDHRA PRADESH
5382
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
नई दली, 3 अग त, 2018
का.आ
का.आ
का.आ
का.आ. 1320
1320
1320
1320.—कीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासकय योजन के िलए योग) िनयम, 1976 (1987 म यथा संशोिधत)
के िनयम 10 के उप िनयम (4) के अनुसरण म भारतीय टेट ब/क के सूचीब2 काया3लय/शाखा5 को अिधसूिचत करती है, िजनके 80% से
अिधक कम3चा8रय ने 9हंदी का काय3साधक :ान ा; कर िलया है : -
<.सं.
ब/क का नाम
शाखा5/काया3लय क सं>या
1.
भारतीय टेट ब/क
29
कुल
कुल
कुल
कुल
29
29
29
29
[फा.सं. 11016/2/2017-9हं.(अिध.)]
शैलेश कुमार 9संह, संयु? िनदेशक (राजभाषा)
राजभाषा
राजभाषा
राजभाषा
राजभाषा िनयम 1976 के
िनयम 1976 के
िनयम 1976 के
िनयम 1976 के िनयम 10(4) के अंतगत अिधसूिचत कए जाने
िनयम 10(4) के अंतगत अिधसूिचत कए जाने
िनयम 10(4) के अंतगत अिधसूिचत कए जाने
िनयम 10(4) के अंतगत अिधसूिचत कए जाने वाले कायालय/शाखा क! सूची
वाले कायालय/शाखा क! सूची
वाले कायालय/शाखा क! सूची
वाले कायालय/शाखा क! सूची
1
भारतीय टेट ब/क
सूया3नगर शाखा 191,
सूया3नगर, कलमना रोड,
िजला : नागपुर
राAय: : : : महाराB
कूट सं- 31776,
िपन-440035
फ़ैDस : (0712) 2682100
2
भारतीय टेट ब/क
फाम3ल/ड शाखा
50, एसकेजे हाउस,
सटर पॉइंट होटल के पीछे,
रामदासपेठ, िजला : नागपुर,
राAय: महाराB
कूट सं. 21491,
िपन-440010
फ़ैDस: 0712) 2447788
3
भारतीय टेट ब/क
पावर िLड कैMपस शाखा,
नारी Nरंग रोड,
संीित न गर, िजला : नागपुर
राAय: : : : महाराB,
कूट सं. 21034, नागपुर
िपन-440026
फ़ैDस : (0712) 2653752
4
भारतीय टेट ब/क
एसबीआई इनटच Pेफक पाक3 ,
वीआईपी रोड,धरमपेठ,
िजला : नागपुर, राAय: : : : महाराB
कूट सं. 19099,नागपुर
िपन-440010
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940
5383
फ़ैDस : (0712) 2544220
5
भारतीय टेट ब/क
लकडगंज शाखा
Qलॉट सं. 42,
लकडगंज,छापS नगर चौक,
िजला : नागपुर,
राAय: : : : महाराB
कूट सं. 32657,नागपुर
िपन-440008
फ़ैDस : (00712) 07122735518
6
भारतीय टेट ब/क,
बेसा शाखा,
एसबीटी, फ़ॉरUयुन एMपायर,
बेलतरोडी रोड, मनीष नगर,
िजला : नागपुर,
राAय: : : : महाराB
कूट सं. 70875,
नागपुर-440037
फ़ैDस : (07103) 281320
7
भारतीय टेट ब/क
काँLेस नगर शाखा,
Qलॉट सं-9, मुंजे रोड,
काँLेस नगर,िजला : नागपुर,
राAय: : : : महाराB
कूट सं. 70602, नागपुर
िपन-440012
फ़ैDस :07120) 2436833
8
भारतीय टेट ब/क
बडकस चौक शाखा,
खिड़या कॉMQलेDस,
बडकस चौक,महल
िजला : नागपुर
राAय: महाराB
कूट सं. 20539,नागपुर
िपन-440002
फ़ैDस : (0712) 2436833
9
भारतीय टेट ब/क
आकाशवाणी चौक,
पूनम Qलाज़ा,
वागत लॉन के सामने,
िसिवल लाइन,
िजला : नागपुर,
राAय: : : : महाराB
कूट सं-51191,नागपुर
5384
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
िपन-440001
फ़ैDस :07120) 2540171
10
भारतीय टेट ब/क,
इनटच चंपुर शाखा,
Qलॉट सं. 02,
बापट नगर,
संत गजानन मंदर चौक,
नागपुर रोड,
चंपुर तालुका चंपूर
राAय: महाराB कूट सं.19245
िपन 442401
फ़ैDस : (7172) 266088
11
भारतीय टेट ब/क,
राजुरा शाखा,
आिसफाबाद रोड, राजुरा
तालुका चंपूर,
राAय: महाराB,
कूट सं. 20059
िपन 442905
फ़ैDस : (07173) 222138
12
भारतीय टेट ब/क,
खमारी शाखा,
Lाम पंचायत हाउस सं 891,
गेट नं 1548, हलबीटोला, गदया,
तालुका – भंडारा, राAय: महाराB,
कूट सं. 18922
िपन 441601
13
भारतीय टेट ब/क,
िमहान शाखा, सेDटर-17
सPल फ़ैिसिलटी िब9डंग
िमहान नागपुर,
तालुका – नागपुर
राAय: महाराB
कूट सं. 18676
िपन 441108
14
भारतीय टेट ब/क,
इनटच वधा3 शाखा,
जय संतोषी कॉMQलेDस,
धंतोली चौक, वधा3 तालुका – वधा3,
राAय: महाराB
कूट सं. 19239
िपन 442001
फ़ैDस : (07152) 253747
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940
5385
15
भारतीय टेट ब/क,
नवाथे Qलॉट शाखा,
दसारा मैदान के सामने
बडनेरा रोड, अमरावती
तालुका –अमरावती,
राAय: महाराB,
कूट-17754
िपन 444605
16
भारतीय टेट ब/क,
इनटच शाखा अमरावती शाखा,
नवाथे Qलॉट,
दसारा मैदान के सामने
बडनेरा रोड, अमरावती
तालुका –अमरावती,
राAय: महाराB
कोड:19228
िपन 444605
फ़ैDस : (0721) 2560956
17
भारतीय टेट ब/क,
राजापेठ अमरावती शाखा
बडनेरा रोड,
राजापेठ अमरावती,
तालुका : अमरावती,
राAय : महाराB, कूट-20603
िपन : 444601
फ़ैDस : (0721) 2576902
18
भारतीय टेट ब/क,
िचखलगाँव शाखा
सुधाताई जगZाथ,
बाबा नगर,वाई पॉइंट,
बाय पास के पास,
यवतमाल रोड, िचखलगांव ,
वणी, तालुका : यवतमाल,
राAय : महाराB, कूट-18988
िपन: 445304
19
भारतीय टेट ब/क,
लोहारा शाखा,
एकिवरा होटल के पास,
लोहारा यवतमाल
तालुका : यवतमाल,
राAय : महाराB,
कूट-18643
िपन: 445001
फ़ैDस : (07232) 249455
5386
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
20
भारतीय टेट ब/क,
मेन लाइन यवतमाल
सरदार चौक,
तांगा चौक के पास,
[ारा सेस एंड परचेस,
ऑफस िब9डंग यवतमाल
तालुका : यवतमाल,
राAय : महाराB, कूट-17870
िपन: 445001
21
भारतीय टेट ब/क,
इनटच यवतमाल शाखा,
शुभम, ितलक मारक मंदर के सामने
महादेव मंदर रोड िसिवल लाइंस
तालुका : यवतमाल,
राAय : महाराB, कूट-19250
िपन: 445001
फ़ैDस : (07232) 237948
22
भारतीय टेट ब/क,
वडगांव शाखा, िशव चौक,
बालापुर-पातुर रोड
पोट – वडेगांव,
तालुका:बालापुर,
िजला : अकोला,
राAय : महाराB
कूट-18660
िपन: 444502
फ़ैDस : (07257) 231006
23
भारतीय टेट ब/क,
इन टच वािशम शाखा,
िनम3ल कॉMQलेDस,
वागत लॉ]स के पास
वािशम, िजला : : : : अकोला,
राAय : महाराB
कूट-19240
िपन: 444505
फ़ैDस : (07252) 234611
24
भारतीय टेट ब/क,
इन टच अकोला शाखा
गोर^ण रोड,
गोर^ण संथान के पास
अकोला, िजला : अकोला,
राAय : महाराB
कूट-19244
िपन: 444004
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940
5387
फ़ैDस : (00724) 2458753
25
भारतीय टेट ब/क,
जठारपेठ अकोला शाखा,
टी मृित,वाकरेवाड़ी,
होली <ॉस का]वट कूल के पास,
जठारपेठ चौक,
अकोला, महाराB
िजला : अकोला,
राAय : महाराB
कूट-20582, िपन: 444001
फ़ैDस : (0724) 2450565
26
भारतीय टेट ब/क,
इन टच बुलढाणा शाखा
ध]व]तरी अपताल के पास,
चैत]यवाड़ी, बुलढाणा,
तालुका एवं िजला : बुलढाणा
राAय : महाराB, कूट-19247
िपन: 443001
फ़ैDस : (07262) 246333
27
भारतीय टेट ब/क,
बालाजी मंदर चौक देउलगाँव शाखा
ईट-1 शिनवारपेठ,
देउलगांवराजा, बुलढाणा,
तालुका एवं िजला : बुलढाणा
राAय : महाराB, कूट-20060
िपन: 443204
फ़ैDस : (07261) 232007
28
भारतीय टेट ब/क,
गांधी चौक शेनगांव शाखा
हाउस नं 241,गांधी चौक,
मंदर रोड, शेनगांव,
बुलढाणा डीटी
िजला : बीड, राAय: महाराB
कूट-21442 , िपन: 443203
फ़ैDस : (07265) 252744
29
भारतीय टेट ब/क,
िचखली रोड बुलढाणा शाखा
भारतीय टेट ब/क 4,
वाड3 नं 10, सनेनगर, िचखली रोड,
िजला : बीड, राAय : महाराB
कूट-21443 , िपन: 443001
फ़ैDस : (07262) 246615
5388
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
New Delhi, the 3rd August, 2018
S.O. 1320.—In pursuance of sub-rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for official purposes of the
Union) Rules, 1976 (as amended in 1987), the Central Government, hereby notifies the listed Offices/Branches of State
Bank of India, more than 80% of the staff whereof have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi:-
Serial
No.
Name of the Bank
Number of Branches/Offices
1.
State Bank of India
29
Total
29
[F.No.11016/2/2017-OL(Noti.)]
SHAILESH KUMAR SINGH, Jt. Director (OL)
List of Branches / Offices to be notified under rule 10(4) of Official Language Rules 1976
1
STATE BANK OF INDIA
SURYA NAGAR BRANCH,
191 SURYA NAGAR, KALMANA ROAD,
DIST: NAGPUR,
STATE: MAHARASHTRA
PIN : 440035
CODE: 31776
FAX : (0712) 2682100
2
STATE BANK OF INDIA
FARMLAND BRANCH
50, S K J HOUSE,
BEHIND CENTRE POINT HOTEL,
RAMDASPETH,NAGPUR,
DIST:NAGPUR,
STATE: MAHARASHTRA
CODE: 21491
PIN : 440010
FAX: (0712) 2447788
3
STATE BANK OF INDIA
POWER GRID CAMPUS BRANCH
SAMPRITI NAGAR,
NARI RING ROAD
NAGPUR, DIST : NAGPUR,
STATE: MAHARASHTRA
CODE: 21034
PIN : 440026
FAX: (0712) 2653752
4
STATE BANK OF INDIA
SBI INTOUCH TRAFFIC PARK BRANCH
VIP ROAD,
DHARAMPETH
NAGPUR 440010
DIST : NAGPUR,
STATE: MAHARASHTRA
PIN : 440010
CODE: 19099
FAX: (0712) 2544220
5
STATE BANK OF INDIA
LAKADGANJ BRANCH
PLOT NO. 42
LAKADGANJ CHHAPRUNAGAR CHOWK
NAGPUR,
DIST:NAGPUR,
STATE:MAHARASHTRA
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940
5389
PIN : 440008
CODE: 32657
FAX: (00712) 07122735518
6
STATE BANK OF INDIA
BESA BRANCH
SBT, FORTUNE EMPIRE,
BELTARODI ROAD,
MANISH NAGAR,
NAGPUR,
DIST: NAGPUR,
STATE:MAHARASTRA
PIN : 440037
CODE : 70875
FAX: (07103) 281320
7
STATE BANK OF INDIA
CONGRESS NAGAR BRANCH
CONGRESSNAGAR,
PLOT NO-9,
MUNJE MARG
DIST: NAGPUR, S
STATE: MAHARASHTRA
PIN : 440012
CODE : 70602
FAX: (07120) 2436833
8
STATE BANK OF INDIA
BADKAS CHOWK BRANCH
KHADIYA COMPLEX
BADKAS CHOWK, NAGPUR,
DIST: NAGPUR,
STATE: MAHARASHTRA
CODE:20539
PIN : 440002
FAX: (0712) 2775251
9
STATE BANK OF INDIA
AKAASHWANI CHOWK BRANCH,
POONAM PLAZA,
CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR
DIST : NAGPUR,
STATE: MAHARASHTRA
PIN : 440001
CODE :51191
FAX: (07120) 2540171
10
STATE BANK OF INDIA
INTOUCH CHANDRAPUR BRANCH
PLOT NO 02 BAPAT NAGAR,
SANT GAJANAN MANDIR CHOWK,
NAGPUR ROAD
DIST : CHANDRAPUR,
STATE: MAHARASHTRA
PIN : 442401
CODE : 19245
FAX: (7172) 266088
11
STATE BANK OF INDIA
RAJURA BRANCH
ASIFABAD ROAD, RAJURA
DIST-CHANDRAPUR,
STATE: MAHARASHTRA
PIN : 442905
CODE : 20059
FAX: (07173) 222138
5390
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
12
STATE BANK OF INDIA
KHAMARI BRANCH
GRAM PANCHAYAT
HOUSE NO.891
GAT NO 1548
HALBITOLA GONDIA,
DIST : BHANDARA,
STATE: MAHARASHTRA
PIN : 441601
CODE:18922,
13
STATE BANK OF INDIA
MIHAN BRANCH
SECTOR 17,
CENTRAL FACILITY BUILDING
MIHAN, NAGPUR
DIST : NAGPUR,
STATE: MAHARASHTRA
PIN : 441108
CODE:18676
14
STATE BANK OF INDIA
INTOUCH WARDHA BRANCH
JAI SANTOSHI COMPLEX,
DHANTOLI CHOWK
WARDHA, DIST:WARDHA,
STATE:MAHARASHTRA
PIN : 442001
CODE: 19239
FAX: (07152) 253747
15
STATE BANK OF INDIA
NAWATHE PLOT BRANCH
ATNAWATHE PLOT,
IN FRONT OFDASARAMAIDAN
BADNERA ROAD,
AMRAVATI
DIST : AMRAVATI,
STATE: MAHARASHTRA
PIN : 444605
CODE:17754
FAX: (0721) 2560956
16
STATE BANK OF INDIA
INTOUCH AMRAVATI BRANCH
NAWATHE PLOT,
INFRONT OF DASERA MAIDAN,
BADNERA RD, AMRAVATI
DIST : AMRAVATI,
STATE: MAHARASHTRA
PIN: 444605
CODE:19228
FAX: (00721) 2569840
17
STATE BANK OF INDIA
RAJAPETH AMRAVATI BRANCH
BADNERA ROAD,
RAJAPETH,
DIST : AMRAVATI,
STATE: MAHARASHTRA
PIN : 444601
CODE:20603
FAX: (0721) 2576902
18
STATE BANK OF INDIA
CHIKHALGAON BRANCH
BADNERA ROAD,
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940
5391
RAJAPETH, AMRAVATI
DIST : AMRAVATI,
STATE: MAHARASHTRA
PIN : 445304
CODE:18988
FAX: (0721) 257690
19
STATE BANK OF INDIA
LOHAARA BRANCH
NEAR EKVIRA HOTEL,
LOHARA,
DIST : YAVATMAL,
STATE: MAHARASHTRA
PIN : 445001
CODE:18643
FAX: (07232) 249455
20
STATE BANK OF INDIA
MAIN LINE YAVATMAL BRANCH
SARDAR CHOWK,
NEAR TANGA CHOWK,
C/O SALES & PURCHASES,
OFFICE BUILDING,
DIST : YAVATMAL,
STATE: MAHARASHTRA
PIN : 445001
CODE:17870
21
STATE BANK OF INDIA
INTOUCH YAVATMAAL
"SHUBHAM" OPPO TILAK SMARAK MANDIR
MAHADEO MANDIR ROAD
CIVIL LINES
DIST: YAVATMAL,
STATE: MAHARASHTRA
PIN : 445001
CODE:19250
FAX: (07232) 237948
22
STATE BANK OF INDIA
WADEGAON BRANCH
SHIV CHOWK",
BALAPUR-PATUR ROAD
AT POST-WADEGAON,
TQ-BALAPUR
DIST:AKOLA,
STATE : MAHARASHTRA
PIN : 444502,CODE:18660
FAX: (07257) 231006
23
STATE BANK OF INDIA
INTOUCH WASHIM BRANCH
SHIV CHOWK",
BALAPUR-PATUR ROAD
NIRMAL COMPLEX,
NEAR SWAGAT LAWNS
WASHIM,DIST AKOLA,
STATE: MAHARASHTRA
PIN : 444505
CODE:19240
FAX: (07252) 234611
24
STATE BANK OF INDIA
INTOUCH AKOLA BRANCH
GORAKSHAN ROAD
NEAR GORAKSHAN SANSTHAN,
AKOLA, DIST: AKOLA,
5392
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
STATE: MAHARASHTRA
PIN : 444004
CODE:19244
FAX: (00724) 2458753
25
STATE BANK OF INDIA
JATHARPETH AKOLA BRANCH
T SMRITHI,WAKAREWADI,
NEAR HOLYCROSS
CONVENT SCHOOL,
JATHARPET CHOWK,
DIST : AKOLA,
STATE: MAHARASHTRA
PIN : 444001
CODE:20582,FAX: (0724) 2450565
26
STATE BANK OF INDIA
SBI INTOUCH BULDHANA BRANCH
NEAR DHANWANTARI HOSPITAL,
CHAITANYAWADI, BULDANA,
TQ-DIST- BULDANA,
STATE:MAHARASHTRA
PIN : 443001
CODE:19247
FAX: (07262) 246333
27
STATE BANK OF INDIA
BALAJI MANDIR CHOWK
DEULGAON BRANCH
EAST-1, SHANIWARPETH,
DEULGAON RAJA,
DIST: BULDHANA,
STATE: MAHARASHTRA
PIN: 443204
CODE:20060
FAX: (07261) 232007
28
STATE BANK OF INDIA
GANDHI CHOWK
SHENGAON BRANCH
HOUSE NO 241,
GANDHI CHOWK
MANDIR ROAD,
SHENGAON, BULDANA DT
DIST: BEED,
STATE: MAHARASHTRA
PIN: 444203
CODE:21442
FAX: (07265) 252744
29
STATE BANK OF INDIA
CHIKHALI ROAD
BULDHANA BRANCH
STATE BANK OF INDIA 4,
WARD.NO.10,
SANENAGAR,
CHIKHLI ROAD,BULDHANA,
DIST: BEED,
STATE: MAHARASHTRA
PIN : 443001
CODE:21443
FAX: (07262) 246615
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940
5393
नई दली, 3 अग त, 2018
का.आ
का.आ
का.आ
का.आ. 1321
1321
1321
1321.—कीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासकय योजन के िलए योग) िनयम, 1976 (1987 म यथा संशोिधत)
के िनयम 10 के उप िनयम (4) के अनुसरण म द ओरएटल इं योरस कंपनी िलिमटेड के सूचीब2 काया3लय/शाखा5 को अिधसूिचत
करती है, िजनके 80% से अिधक कम3चा8रय ने 9हंदी का काय3साधक :ान ा; कर िलया है : -
<.सं.
िव`ीय संथा का नाम
काया3लय / शाखा5 क सं>या
1.
द ओरएटल इं योरस कंपनी िलिमटेड
18
कुल
कुल
कुल
कुल
18
18
18
18
[फा.सं. 11016/2/2017-9हं.(अिध.)]
शैलेश कुमार 9संह, संयु? िनदेशक (राजभाषा)
राजभाषा िनयम 1976 के िनयम (4) के अंतगत अिधसूिचत कए जाने वाले कायालय / शाखा क! सूची
राजभाषा िनयम 1976 के िनयम (4) के अंतगत अिधसूिचत कए जाने वाले कायालय / शाखा क! सूची
राजभाषा िनयम 1976 के िनयम (4) के अंतगत अिधसूिचत कए जाने वाले कायालय / शाखा क! सूची
राजभाषा िनयम 1976 के िनयम (4) के अंतगत अिधसूिचत कए जाने वाले कायालय / शाखा क! सूची
1
द ओ8रएcटल इंdयोरस कMपनी िलिमटेड
^ेeीय काया3लय -3, मुंबई
टाऊन सटर, टावर-1, छठा तल अंधेरी- कुला3 रोड
मरोल अंधेरी ( पूव3)
मुंबई
िपन : 400059
2
द ओ8रएcटल इंdयोरस कMपनी िलिमटेड
अंधेरी मंड़लीय काया3लय
दूसरा तल, डी. जे हाऊस, िवसन पेन कMपाऊंड,
जुना नगरदास रोड, सबवे के पास,
अंधेरी (पूव3), मुंबई
िपन - 400059.
3
द ओ8रएcटल इंdयोरस कMपनी िलिमटेड
जोगेgरी शाखा काया3लय
103/104, फ़ैजान अपाट3मट,एस. वी. रोड़,
जोगेgरी (प.) मुंबई
िपन – 400102
4
द ओ8रएcटल इंdयोरस कMपनी िलिमटेड
मािहम शाखा काया3लय
8, िवg िवनाल िबड़hग, थम तल,
जसन एंड जसन भगोही कर, माग3 मािहम ( प. )
मुंबई
िपन : 400016
5
द ओ8रएcटल इंdयोरस कMपनी िलिमटेड
बो8रवल मंडल काया3लय
शॉप नं. 7, भुमी सरवती,
गांजावाला लेन
चामुंडा सक3 ल के पास बो8रवली ( प. )
मुंबई
िपन : 400092
6
द ओ8रएcटल इंdयोरस कMपनी िलिमटेड
वसई शाखा काया3लय
5394
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
डी -2, डी. जे. हॉउस,
िवसन पेन कMबाउंड,
ओड नागाड3स रोड, अंधेरी (ई)
मुंबई
िपन : 400069
7
द ओ8रएcटल इंdयोरस कMपनी िलिमटेड
घाटकोपर मंडल काया3लय
शॉप जोन, 5 वी मंिजल,
एम. जी . रोड.
ब/क ऑफ इंिडया के नजदीक,
घाटकोपर ( प ).
मुंबई
िपन : 400086
8
द ओ8रएcटल इंdयोरस कMपनी िलिमटेड
ठाणे मंडल काया3लय
तीसरा तल, सरवती मंदीर,
मराठी Lंथ संLाहय
सुभाश रोड़, ठाणे
िपन : 400601
9
द ओ8रएcटल इंdयोरस कMपनी िलिमटेड
मुलुंड शाखा काया3लय
गाला नं. 1, अरोटा हाऊस,
तल मंिजल, पी.के. रोड
पूजा iलड बैक के नजदीक, मुलुंड ( प )
मुंबई
िपन : 400080
10
द ओ8रएcटल इंdयोरस कMपनी िलिमटेड
कयाण मंडल काया3लय
jी द`ा कृपा, गणेश बाग, मुरबाड रोड
कयाण ( प )
िजला: ठाणे
िपन : 421304
11
द ओ8रएcटल इंdयोरस कMपनी िलिमटेड
िभवंडी शाखा काया3लय
मैिe नाभगन िबडhग,
थम तल,
शाkओ िवlल कोपरे8टव बैक,
राज अली रोड,
डोबीवली (पू.)
िपन : 421201.
12
द ओ8रएcटल इंdयोरस कMपनी िलिमटेड
पनवेल मंडल काया3लय
िनलकंठ ेिटज,
Qलॉट नं. 73, तल मंिजल,
शmबु2े हॉिपटल के नजदीक
पनवेल
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940
5395
िपन : 4012
13
द ओ8रएcटल इंdयोरस कMपनी िलिमटेड
बेलापुर शाखा काया3लय
िव]दया कमnश3यल क़ॉMQलेDस,
चौथी मंिजल
सेDटर 11, Qलाट नं. 1,सी.बी.डी.
बेलापुर, नवी मुंबई
िपन: 400614
14
द ओ8रएcटल इंdयोरस कMपनी िलिमटेड
पेण शाखा काया3लय
मोरेgर टॉकज के सामने,
एस.टी. टड के नजदीक
पेण तालुका
िजला : रायगड़
पेण
िपन : 400702
15
द ओ8रएcटल इंdयोरस कMपनी िलिमटेड
वाको मंडल काया3लय
परेरा चMपस3, थम तल,
फ़ॉदर जोस रोड़
पो.बाDस नं. 105
वाको-दा-गामा
िपन : 403802
16
द ओ8रएcल इंdयोरस कMपनी िलिमटेड
पंिजम मंडल काया3लय
गोऊवेला चMबस3,
3 तीसरा तल हेलीडोरो सालगाडो रोड
पंिजम, गोवा,
िपन : 403001
17
द ओ8रएcटल इंdयोरस कMपनी िलिमटेड
मडगांव मंडल काया3लय
राजाpय^ पाक3,
एल. आई.सी िबडhग,
पहली मंिजल
लोयल कूल कोMबा के पीछे,
वी.एस. रोड़ कोMबा
मडगांव, गोवा
िपन : 403601
18
द ओ8रएcटल इंdयोरस कMपनी िलिमटेड
सावरडम शाखा काया3लय
दूसरी मंिजल, गफुर िबड़ीग, टेशन रोड
चचोरेम, गोवा
सावरडम
िपन : 403706
5396
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
New Delhi, the 3rd August, 2018
S.O. 1321.—In pursuance of sub-rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for official purposes of the
Union) Rules, 1976 (as amended in 1987), the Central Government, hereby notifies the listed Offices/Branches of The
Oriental Insurance Company Limited, more than 80% of the staff whereof have acquired the working knowledge of
Hindi:-
Serial
No.
Name of the Financial Institution
Number of Offices/ Branches
1.
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited
18
Total
18
[F.No.11016/2/2017-OL(Noti.)]
SHAILESH KUMAR SINGH, Jt. Director (OL)
List of Offices/Branches to be notified under Rule 10 (4) of Official Language Rule 1976
1
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited
Regional Office-3, Mumbai
Town Center -1, 6th Floor
Andheri-Kurla Road, Marol
Andheri ( E)
Mumbai
Pin : 400059
2
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited
D.O. Andheri
D-2, D.J. House, Wilson Pen Compound
Old Nagardas Road
Andheri ( E ) Mumbai
Pin : 400069
3
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited
Jogeshwari Branch Office
103/104, Faizan Apartment, S.V. Road
Jogeshwari ( W)
Mumbai
Pin: 4000102
4
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited
Branch Office Mahim
8, Vishva Vinal Building 1st floor
Behind Johnson & Johnson
Bhagohi Kir Marg
Mahim West Mumbai
Pin: 400016
5
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited
D.O. - Borivali
Shop No. 7, Bhoomi Saraswathi, Ganjawala
Lane
NR. Chamunda Circle, Borivali ( W)
Mumbai
Pin: 400092
6
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited
Branch Office Vasai
Lawrence Trade Centre, B/113, 1st floor
Navhar Road
Vasai-40120
7
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited
D.O. Ghatkopar
Shop Zone, 5th Floor, M.G, Road
Ghatkopar ( W )
Mumbai
Pin: 400086
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940
5397
8
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited
D.O. Thane
3rd Floor, Saraswati Manadir,
Marathi Granth Sangrahalaya
Subhash Road
Thane
Pin: 4000601
9
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited
Branch Mulund
Gala No.1, Ground Floor,
Aroto House
P.K.Road, Mulund (W)
Mumbai
Pin: 400080
10
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited
D.O. Kalayan
Shree Datta Krupa, Murbad Road
Kalyan West
Dist. : Thane
Pin: 421304
11
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited
Branch Office Bhiwandi
Maitri Nabhagan Building,
1st Floor, above
Shamrao Vithal Cooperative Bank
Raj Ali Road
Dombivali ( E )
Pin: 421201
12
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited
D.O. Panvel
Nilkant Prestige,
Plot No. 73, Gr. Floor
Near Sahastrabudhe Hospital
Panvel
Pin: 401206
13
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited
Branch Office Belapur
Vindhya Commercial Complex, 4th Floor
Sector-11, Plot No. , CBD
Belaupr
Navi Mumbai
Pin: 400614
14
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited
Branch Office Pen
Opp. Moreshwar Talkies,
Near S.T. Stand
Taluka Pen
Pen
Distict : Raigad
Pin: 4000702
15
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited
D.O. Vasco
Pereira Chambers, 1st Floor,
Fr. Jose Vaz Road
P.O. Box No. 105
Vaco-Da-Gama
Pin: 403802
16
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited
D.O. Panji
Gouveia Chambers, 3rd Floor,
Helidoro Salgado Road
Panji, Goa
Panji
5398
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Pin : 403001
17
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited
D.O. Madgaon
Rajadhapaksha Park,
Ground & 1st Floor Behind Loyola High
School
V S Road, Comba Margao
Goa, Pin: 403 601
18
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited
Branch Office Savardem
2nd Floor, Gafur Building, Station Road
Curchorem, Goa
Savordom
Pin: 403706
नई दली, 3 अग त, 2018
का.आ
का.आ
का.आ
का.आ. 1322
1322
1322
1322.—कीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासकय योजन के िलए योग) िनयम, 1976 (1987 म यथा-संशोिधत)
के िनयम 10 के उप-िनयम (4) के अनुसरण म द ओरएटल इं योरस कंपनी िलिमटेड के सूचीब2 काया3लय को अिधसूिचत करती है,
िजनके 80% से अिधक कम3चा8रय ने 9हंदी का काय3साधक :ान ा; कर िलया है : -
<.सं.
िव`ीय संथा का नाम
काया3लय / शाखा5 क सं>या
1.
द ओरएटल इं योरस कंपनी िलिमटेड
8
कुल
कुल
कुल
कुल
8
[फा.सं. 11016/2/2017-9हं.(अिध.)]
शैलेश कुमार 9संह, संयु? िनदेशक (राजभाषा)
राजभाषा िनयम 1976 के िनयम
राजभाषा िनयम 1976 के िनयम
राजभाषा िनयम 1976 के िनयम
राजभाषा िनयम 1976 के िनयम 10
10
10
10(4) के अंतगत अिधसूिचत कए जाने वाले कायालय
(4) के अंतगत अिधसूिचत कए जाने वाले कायालय
(4) के अंतगत अिधसूिचत कए जाने वाले कायालय
(4) के अंतगत अिधसूिचत कए जाने वाले कायालय क! सूची
क! सूची
क! सूची
क! सूची
1
द ओ8रएcटल इंdयोरस कंपनी िलिमटेड
^ेeीय काया3लय
4, लायंस रज
कोलकाता
िपन : 700001
2
द ओ8रएcटल इंdयोरस कंपनी िलिमटेड
मंडल काया3लय - 4
33, टीफन हाऊस
कोलकाता
िपन : 700001
3
द ओ8रएcटल इंdयोरस कंपनी िलिमटेड
सी. बी. यू.
7, रेड <ोस Qलेस
कोलकाता
िपन : 700001
4
द ओ8रएcटल इंdयोरस कंपनी िलिमटेड
मंडल काया3लय - हावड़ा
पी-4, डबसन लेन, चतुथ3 तल
हावड़ा
िपन : 711101
5
द ओ8रएcटल इंdयोरस कंपनी िलिमटेड
मंडल काया3लय - हिदया
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940
5399
सुपर माकqट कMQलेDस, दुगा3 चौक
हिदया
िपन : 721602
6
द ओ8रएcटल इंdयोरस कंपनी िलिमटेड
मंडल काया3लय - आसनसोल
उमा भवन, दूसरा तल, जी. टी. रोड
आसनसोल
िपन : 713301
7
द ओ8रएcटल इंdयोरस कंपनी िलिमटेड
नगर शाखा काया3लय -1
मलहोeा टावस3, िहल काट3 रोड
िसलीगुड़ी
िपन : 734401
8
द ओ8रएcटल इंdयोरस कंपनी िलिमटेड
नगर शाखा काया3लय - 2
िहल काट3 रोड
िसलीगुड़ी
िपन : 734401
New Delhi, the 3rd August, 2018
S.O. 1322.—In pursuance of sub-rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for official purposes of the
Union) Rules, 1976 (as amended in 1987), the Central Government, hereby notifies the listed Offices of The Oriental
Insurance Company Limited, more than 80% of the staff whereof have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi:-
Serial
No.
Name of the Financial Institution
Number of Offices/ Branches
1.
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited
8
Total
8
[F.No.11016/2/2017-OL(Noti.)]
SHAILESH KUMAR SINGH, Jt. Director (OL)
List of offices to be notified under Rule 10(4) of Official Language Rule l976
1
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited
Regional Office
4, Lyons Range
Kolkata
Pin – 700001
2
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited
Divisional Office - 4
33, Stiphen House
Kolkata
Pin – 700001
3
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited
CBU
7, Red Cross Place
Kolkata
Pin – 700001
4
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited
Divisional Office - Howrah
P-4, Dabsan Lane, 4th Floor
Howrah
5400
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Pin – 711101
5
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited
Divisional Office - Haldia
Super Market Complex, Durga Chawk
Haldia
Pin – 721602
6
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited
Divisional Office, Asansol
Uma Bhawan, 2nd Floor, G.T.Road
Asansol
Pin – 713301
7
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited
City Branch Office-1
Malhotra Towers, Hill Cart Road
Siliguri
Pin – 734401
8
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited
City Branch Office-2
Hill Cart Road
Siliguri
Pin – 734401
नई दली, 7 अगत, 2018
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 1323
1323
1323
1323.—भारतीय 8रजव3 ब/क अिधिनयम, 1934, (1934 का 2) क धारा 8 क उप-धारा (1) के खंड (ग) [ारा द`
शि?य का योग करते sए, के]ीय सरकार, एतtारा, jी सतीश काशीनाथ मराठे (ज]म ितिथ: 1.2.1950) को उ]ह नािमत कए जाने
क अिधसूचना क तारीख से चार वष3 क अविध के िलए अथवा अगले आदेश तक, जो भी पहले हो, भारतीय 8रजव3 ब/क के के]ीय बोड3
म अंशकािलक गैर-सरकारी िनदेशक के पद पर नािमत करती है।
[फा.सं. 1/14/2016-बीओ-I]
:ानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 7th August, 2018
S.O.1323.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 8 of the Reserve
Bank of India Act, 1934 (2 of 1934), the Central Government hereby nominates Shri Satish Kashinath Marathe (DOB:
1.2.1950) as part-time non-official Director on the Central Board of Reserve Bank of India for a period of four years
from the date of notification of his nomination, or until further orders, whichever is earlier.
[F. No. 1/14/2016-BO-I]
JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.
नई दली, 7 अगत, 2018
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 1324
1324
1324
1324.— भारतीय 8रजव3 ब/क अिधिनयम, 1934, (1934 का 2) क धारा 8 क उप-धारा (1) के खंड (ग) [ारा द`
शि?य का योग करते sए, के]ीय सरकार, एतtारा, jी वामीनाथन गुxमूnत3 (ज]म ितिथ: 4.3.1949) को उ]ह नािमत कए जाने क
अिधसूचना क तारीख से चार वष3 क अविध के िलए अथवा अगले आदेश तक, जो भी पहले हो, भारतीय 8रजव3 ब/क के के]ीय बोड3 म
अंशकािलक गैर-सरकारी िनदेशक के पद पर नािमत करती है।
[फा.सं. 1/1/2018-बीओ-I]
:ानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 7th August, 2018
S.O. 1324.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 8 of the Reserve
Bank of India Act, 1934 (2 of 1934), the Central Government hereby nominates Shri Swaminathan Gurumurthy (DOB:
4.3.1949) as part-time non-official Director on the Central Board of Reserve Bank of India for a period of four years
from the date of notification of his nomination, or until further orders, whichever is earlier.
[F. No. 1/1/2018-BO-I]
JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940
5401
नई दली, 13 अगत, 2018
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 1325
1325
1325
1325.—राBीयकृत ब/क (बंध एवं कण3 उपबंध) कम, 1970 के पैरा 9 के उप-पैरा (2) के खंड (ख) के साथ प8ठत
ब/ककारी कंपनी (उप<म का अज3न एवं अंतरण) अिधिनयम, 1970 क धारा 9 क उप-धारा (3) के खंड (ज) [ारा द` शि?य का
योग करते sए, के]ीय सरकार, एतtारा, jी गोपालरमण पzनाभन (ज]म ितिथ: 29.5.1955) को दनांक 14.8.2018 से दो वष3 क
अविध के िलए या अगले आदेश तक, जो भी पहले हो, ब/क आफ इंिडया के िनदेशक मcडल म अंशकािलक गैर-सरकारी िनदेशक के पद पर
पुन: नािमत करती है और ब/क के बोड3 के गैर-काय3पालक अpय^ के पद पर उनक िनयुि? को उ? अविध तक बढ़ाती है।
[फा.सं. 8/4/2018-बीओ-I]
:ानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 13th August, 2018
S.O. 1325.—In exercise of powers conferred by clause (h) of sub-section (3) of section 9 of the Banking
Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970, read with clause (b) of sub-paragraph (2) of paragraph
9 of the Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970, the Central Government hereby
re-nominates Shri Gopalaraman Padmanabhan (DoB: 29.5.1955) as part-time non-official Director on the Board of
Directors of Bank of India for a term of two years with effect from 14.8.2018, or until further orders, whichever is earlier,
and extends his appointment as non-executive Chairman of the bank’s Board for the said period.
[F. No. 8/4/2018-BO-I]
JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.
नई दली, 13 अगत, 2018
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 1326
1326
1326
1326.— राBीयकृत ब/क (बंध एवं कण3 उपबंध) कम, 1970 के पैरा 9 के उप-पैरा (2) के खंड (ख) के साथ प8ठत
ब/ककारी कंपनी (उप<म का अज3न एवं अंतरण) अिधिनयम, 1970 क धारा 9 क उप-धारा (3) के खंड (ज) [ारा द` शि?य का
योग करते sए, के]ीय सरकार, एतtारा, jी थोथला नारायणसामी मनोहरण (ज]म ितिथ: 7.4.1956) को दनांक 14.8.2018 से दो
वष3 क अविध के िलए या अगले आदेश तक, जो भी पहले हो, केनरा ब/क के िनदेशक मcडल म अंशकािलक गैर-सरकारी िनदेशक के पद
पर पुन: नािमत करती है और ब/क के बोड3 के गैर-काय3पालक अpय^ के पद पर उनक िनयुि? को उ? अविध तक बढ़ाती है।
[फा.सं. 8/4/2018-बीओ-I]
:ानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 13th August, 2018
S.O. 1326.— In exercise of powers conferred by clause (h) of sub-section (3) of section 9 of the Banking
Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970, read with clause (b) of sub-paragraph (2) of paragraph
9 of the Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970, the Central Government hereby
re-nominates Shri Thothala Narayanasamy Manoharan (DoB: 7.4.1956) as part-time non-official Director on the Board
of Directors of Canara Bank for a term of two years with effect from 14.8.2018, or until further orders, whichever is
earlier, and extends his appointment as non-executive Chairman of the bank’s Board for the said period.
[F. No. 8/4/2018-BO-I]
JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.
नई दली, 13 अगत, 2018
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 1327
1327
1327
1327.— यत: सुjी ऊषा अनंतसुमिणयन को दनांक 5.5.2017 क अिधसूचना के [ारा पद के काय3भार Lहण करने
क तारीख से, दनांक 13.8.2018 या अगले आदेश तक, जो भी पहले हो, इलाहाबाद ब/क के बंध िनदेशक एवं मु>य काय3कारी
अिधकारी के पद पर िनयु? कया गया था;
और यत: सुjी अनंतसुमिणयन को राBीयकृत ब/क (बंध और कण3 उपबंध) कम, 1970 के पैरा 8 के उप-पैरा (4) के
उपबंध के अनुसार दनांक 3.7.2018 के पe के [ारा कारण बताने का अवसर दया गया था क Dय न उ]ह बंध िनदेशक एवं मु>य
काय3कारी अिधकारी के पद पर रहते sए पंजाब नैशनल ब/क के काय3करण पर समुिचत िनयंeण रखने म असफल रहने के िलए पद से हटा
दया जाए, िजसके कारण ब/क क ैडी हाऊस शाखा, मुMबई म एसडiयूआईएफटी (िवट) का दुxपयोग करके धोखाधड़ी क गई,
िजनका कई वष तक पता नहh चल सका, िजससे बड़ी रािश क धोखाधड़ी sई;
5402
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
और यत: इलाहाबाद ब/क के बोड3 से भी उ? उप-पैरा (4) के उपबंध के संदभ3 म परामश3 कया गया था;
और यत: कारण बताओ नो8टस के संबंध म सुjी अनंतसुमिणयन के उ`र सिहत मामले और इलाहाबाद ब/क के बोड3 क
8टQपिणय को pयान म रखते sए इलाहाबाद ब/क के बंध िनदेशक एवं मु>य काय3कारी अिधकारी के पद पर सुjी अनंतसुमिणयन के बने
रहने पर िवचार पंजाब नैशनल ब/क म उनक उ? असफलता के संदभ3 म कए जाने क आवdयकता है, के]ीय सरकार इससे संतु है क
उ]ह उ? पद से हटाना इलाहाबाद ब/क के िहत म समयोिचत है;
अत: अब ब/ककारी कंपनी (उप<म का अज3न एवं अंतरण) अिधिनयम, 1970 क धारा 9 के अंतग3त द` शि?य का योग
करते sए के]ीय सरकार [ारा बनाई गई राBीयकृत ब/क (बंध और कण3 उपबंध) कम, 1970 के पैरा 8 के उप-पैरा (4) के उपबंध के
अंतग3त द` शि?य का योग करते sए के]ीय सरकार, इससे संतु होने पर क सुjी अनंतसुमिणयन को इलाहाबाद ब/क के बंध
िनदेशक एवं मु>य काय3कारी के पद से हटाना इलाहाबाद ब/क के िहत म समयोिचत है, उ]ह, एतtारा, इस पद से तकाल हटाती है।
[फा.सं. 16/13/2018-बीओ-I]
:ानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 13th August, 2018
S.O. 1327.— Whereas Ms. Usha Ananthasubramanian was appointed as Managing Director and Chief
Executive Officer, Allahabad Bank, vide notification dated 5.5.2017, with effect from the date of her taking over charge
of the post, and up to 13.8.2018, or until further orders, whichever is earlier:
And whereas, Ms. Ananthasubramanian, was given opportunity in terms of the provisions of sub-paragraph (4)
of paragraph 8 of the Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970, to show cause vide
letter dated 3.7.2018 why she should not be removed from office for having failed in exercising proper control over the
functioning of Punjab National Bank while serving as its Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer, which enabled
the fraud in the bank through misuse of SWIFT at the bank’s Brady House, Mumbai Branch to persist undetected for
several years, snowballing into a large amount:
And whereas, the Board of Allahabad Bank was also consulted in terms of the provisions of sub-paragraph (4)
ibid.:
And whereas, after considering the matter, including Ms. Anathasubramanian’s reply to the show-cause notice
and the comments of the Board of Allahabad Bank, and considering that Ms Ananthasubramanian’s continuance in office
as Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer, Allahabad Bank needs to be viewed in the context of her failure as
aforesaid in Punjab National Bank, the Central Government is satisfied that it is expedient in the interests of Allahabad
Bank to remove her from the said office:
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred under the provisions of sub-paragraph (4) of paragraph 8 of
the Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provision) Scheme, 1970, made by the Central Government in
exercise of powers under section 9 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970, the
Central Government hereby removes Ms. Usha Ananthasubramanian from the office of Managing Director and Chief
Executive Officer of Allahabad Bank, with immediate effect, for the reason that it is satisfied that it is expedient in the
interests of Allahabad Bank to so remove.
[F. No. 16/13/2018-BO-I]
JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.
नई दली, 14 अगत, 2018
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 1328
1328
1328
1328.—सरकार, एतtारा, सुjी दि^ता दास, अपर सिचव, िव`ीय सेवाएं िवभाग, िव` मंeालय को तकाल भाव
से, अगले आदेश तक, अपने वत3मान काय3भार के अित8र? राBीय आवास ब/क के बंध िनदेशक एवं मु>य काय3कारी अिधकारी (एमडी एवं
सीईओ) के पद का अित8र? काय3भार सपती है।
[फा.सं. 24/3(II)/2017-आईएफ-II]
मोद कुमार 9संह, अवर सिचव
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940
5403
New Delhi, the 14th August, 2018
S.O. 1328.—Government hereby assigns the additional charge of MD & CEO of National Housing Bank to
Ms. Dakshita Das, Additional Secretary, Department of Financial Services, Ministry of Finance, in addition to her
present responsibilities, with immediate effect, until further orders.
[F. No. 24/3(II)/2017-IF-II]
PROMODE KUMAR SINGH, Under Secy.
नई दली, 14 अगत, 2018
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 1329
1329
1329
1329.— jी jीराम कयाणरमन [ारा राBीय आवास ब/क (एनएचबी) के बंध िनदेशक एवं मु>य काय3कारी
अिधकारी (एमडी एवं सीईओ) [ारा 28 मई, 2018 को अपने पद से दए गए यागपe को सरकार, एतtारा, एनएचबी अिधिनयम,
1987 क धारा 7(4) के अंतग3त वीकार करती है। उ]ह तकाल भाव से पदभार मु? माना जाएगा। पदधारी क ओर से सांिविधक
नो8टस देने क तीन महीने क अविध से छूट दी जाती है और शेष अविध के बदले वेतन तथा भ` के भुगतान से छूट देने को भी वीकृित
दी जाती है।
[फा.सं. 24/3(I)/2017-आईएफ-II]
मोद कुमार 9संह, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 14th August, 2018
S.O. 1329.—Resignation tendered by Shri Sriram Kalyanraman from the post of Managing Director & Chief
Executive Officer (MD & CEO), National Housing Bank (NHB) dated 28th May 2018, is hereby accepted by the
Government under Section 7(4) of the NHB Act, 1987. He shall stand relieved from the post with immediate effect.
Statutory notice period of three months on the part of the incumbent is waived off and exemption from payment of salary
and allowances in lieu thereof for the remaining period is granted.
[F. No. 24/3(I)/2017-IF-II]
PROMODE KUMAR SINGH, Under Secy.
नई दली, 30 अगत, 2018
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 1330
1330
1330
1330.—भारतीय िनया3त-आयात ब/क अिधिनयम, 1981 (1981 का 28) क धारा 6 क उप-धारा (1) के खंड (ड.) के
उप-खंड (i) [ारा द` शि?य का योग करते sए, के]ीय सरकार, एतtारा, डॉ. अरिव]द सुमिणयन के थान पर आnथ3क काय3
िवभाग, िव` मंeालय म संयु? सिचव (िनवेश) jी के. राजारमन को तकाल भाव से अगले आदेश तक भारतीय िनया3त-आयात ब/क
(एिDजम ब/क) के िनदेशक मcडल म िनदेशक के पद पर नािमत करती है।
[फा.सं. 9/16/2012-आईएफ-I]
सौMयिजत घोष, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 30th August, 2018
S.O. 1330.— In pursuance of Sub-clause (i) of Clause (e) of sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the Export Import
Bank of India Act, 1981 (28 of 1981), the Central Government hereby nominates Shri K. Rajaraman, Joint Secretary
(Investment), Department of Economic Affairs, Ministry of Finance as Director on the Board of Directors of Export
Import Bank of India (EXIM Bank) vice Dr. Arvind Subramanian with immediate effect until further orders.
[F. No. 9/16/2012-IF-I]
SOUMYAJIT GHOSH, Under Secy.
नई दली, 31 अगत, 2018
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ.
का.आ. 1331
1331
1331
1331.—भारतीय िनया3त-आयात ब/क अिधिनयम, 1981 (1981 का 28) क धारा 6 क उप-धारा (1) के खंड (ड.) के
उप-खंड (ii) [ारा द` शि?य का योग करते sए, के]ीय सरकार, एतtारा, jी राजीव ऋिष के थान पर यूिनयन ब/क आफ इंिडया म
एमडी एवं सीईओ jी राजकरन राय जी. को 01 िसतMबर, 2018 से अगले आदेश तक भारतीय िनया3त-आयात ब/क (एिDजम ब/क) के
िनदेशक मcडल म िनदेशक के पद पर नािमत करती है।
[फा.सं. 9/16/2012-आईएफ-I]
सौMयिजत घोष, अवर सिचव
5404
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
New Delhi, the 31st August, 2018
S.O. 1331.—In pursuance of Sub-clause (ii) of Clause (e) of sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the Export Import
Bank of India Act, 1981 (28 of 1981), the Central Government hereby nominates Sh. Rajkiran Rai G, MD & CEO, Union
Bank of India as Director on the Board of Directors of Export Import Bank of India (EXIM Bank) vice Sh. Rajeev Rishi
w.e.f. 1st September, 2018 until further orders.
[F. No. 9/16/2012-IF-I]
SOUMYAJIT GHOSH, Under Secy.
का)मक लोक िशकायत और प-शन
का)मक लोक िशकायत और प-शन
का)मक लोक िशकायत और प-शन
का)मक लोक िशकायत और प-शन मं.ालय
मं.ालय
मं.ालय
मं.ालय
(का)मक और /िश0ण िवभाग)
(का)मक और /िश0ण िवभाग)
(का)मक और /िश0ण िवभाग)
(का)मक और /िश0ण िवभाग)
नई द ली, 29 अगत, 2018
का.आ
का.आ
का.आ
का.आ. . . . 1332
1332
1332
1332.—कीय सरकार, दंड <या संिहता, 1973 (1974 का 2) क धारा 24 क उपधारा (8) [ारा द त शिD तय
का योग करते sए, माननीय बंबई उ ]यायालय क औरंगाबाद िथत ]यायपीठ के सम^ कीय अ] वेषण i यूरो मामला सं0
आरसी2(एस)/2007-मुंबई (वी.जी.पा8टल हया मामला) म और अपील या पुनरी^ण ]यायालय के सम^ अपील या पुनरी^ण और
उनसे संबंिधत या उनसे आनुषंिगक क]ही अ]य मामल म उपिथत होने के िलए jी िनितन बी.सूय3वंशी अिधव?ा, को उनक िनयुि?
तारीख से तीन वष3 क अविध के िलए या मामले के िनपटारे क तारीख तक, जो भी पहले हो, िवशेष लोक अिभयोजक के Sप म िनयु?
करती है।
[फा. सं. 225/04/2018-एवीडी-।।]
एस. पी. आर. िeपाठी, अवर सिचव
MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS
(Department of Personnel and Training)
New Delhi, the 29th August, 2018
S.O. 1332.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (8) of section 24 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Nitin B. Suryavanshi, Advocate as Special
Public Prosecutor for appearing in CBI case No. RC 2(S) /2007-Mumbai (V.G. Patil murder case) before the Hon’ble
Bombay High Court at Aurangabad Bench and in appeals or revisions before the Appellate or Revisional Courts and any
other matters connected therewith or incidental thereto, for a period of three years from the date of appointment or
disposal of the case, whichever is earlier.
[F.No. 225/04/2018-AVD-II]
S. P. R. TRIPATHI, Under Secy.
fons'k ea=kky;
(lh-ih-oh- izHkkx)
ubZ fnYyh] 9 vxLr] 2018
dk-vk-1333-—jktuf;d vkSj dksalqyh; vf/dkjh ('kiFk ,oa iQhl) ds vf/fu;e] 1948 (1948 dk 41) dh /kjk 2 ds
[akM (d) ds vuqlj.k esa dsaæ ljdkj ds }kjk lqJh iq"iyrk lh ts] futh lgk;d 9 vxLr] 2018 ls Hkkjr ds iz/ku dksalykokl] lSu
izQkaflLdks esa lgk;d dksalqyj vf/dkjh ds drZO;ksa dk ikyu djus ds fy, izkfèkÑr djrh gS A
¹la- Vh&4330@01@2015º
izdk'k pUn] funs'kd (dksalqyj)
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940
5405
MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS
(C.P.V. DIVISION)
New Delhi, the 9th August, 2018
S.O. 1333.—In pursuance of clause (a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular Officers (Oaths and
Fees) Act, 1948 (41 of 1948), the Central Government hereby authorizes Ms. Puspalatha C.J., Personal Assistant in
Consulate General of India, San Francisco to perform the Consular services as Assistant Consular Officer with effect
from 9th August, 2018.
[No. T-4330/01/2015]
PRAKASH CHAND, Director (Consular)
िव2ुत
िव2ुत
िव2ुत
िव2ुत मं.ालय
मं.ालय
मं.ालय
मं.ालय
नई दली, 4 िसतM बर, 2018
का.आ
का.आ
का.आ
का.आ.
.
.
. 1334
1334
1334
1334.—कीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासकय योजन के िलए योग) िनयम, 1976 के िनयम 10 के उप िनयम
(4) के अनुसरण म िवुत मंeालय के शासिनक िनयंeणाधीन एनटीपीसी िलिमटेड के मौदा सुपर थम3ल पावर ोजेDट, पोट-
मौदा, िजला-नागपुर-441104, िजसके 80 ितशत कम3चारीवृंद ने 9हंदी का काय3साधक :ान ा; कर िलया है, को एतtारा अिधसूिचत
करती है।
[सं. 11011/9/2017-9हंदी]
भारती, संयु? सिचव
MINISTRY OF POWER
New Delhi, the 4th September, 2018
S.O. 1334.—In pursuance of Sub Rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for Official Purpose of
the Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government hereby notify the Mouda Super Thermal Power Project, P.O. Mauda,
Distt. Nagpur-441104 of NTPC Limited under the administrative control of Ministry of Power, where 80% of the staff
have acquired working knowledge of Hindi.
[No. 11011/9/2017-Hindi]
BHARATI, Jt. Secy.
Je ,oa jkstxkj ea=kky;
ubZ fnYyh] 30 vxLr] 2018
dk-vk- 1335.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj iatkc ,.M
¯l/ cSad ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky la- 2] paMhx<+ ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 237@2012) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 30-08-2018
dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&12012@63@2011&vkbZvkj (ch&II)º
jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT
New Delhi, the 30th August, 2018
S.O. 1335.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 237/2012) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court No. 2, Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Punjab
& Sindh Bank and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 30.08.2018.
[No. L-12012/63/2011-IR (B-II)]
RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer
5406
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ANNEXURE
BEFORE PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT-II,
CHANDIGARH
Case No. ID No. 237 of 2012
Sh. Jasvir Singh S/o Sh. Tara Singh, R/o Village Kutti(Kishanpura),
Tehsil and District Bathinda(Punjab).
…Workman
Versus
1.
Punjab and Sindh Bank through its Zonal Manager,
Punjab and Sindh Bank Zonal Office, Bathinda(Punjab).
2.
Zonal Manager, Punjab and Sindh Bank Zonal Office,
Bathinda (Punjab).
3.
Manager, Punjab and Sindh Bank, Currency Chest,
Bathinda (Punjab).
…Management
AWARD
1.
A reference was received from the Government of India vide Letter No.L-12012/63/2011-IR(B-II), Dated
13.03.2012 under Clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputed Act,
1947(in short the Act) for adjudication of an industrial dispute, terms of which are as under:-
“Whether the action of the Management of the Zonal Manager, Punjab & Sind Bank, Zonal Office,
Bathinda/Manager, Punjab & Sind Bank, Currency Chest, Bathinda in terminating/dis-continuing the
services of Sh. Jasvir Singh S/o Sh. Tara Singh, Ex-Driver w.e.f. 16.04.2010 is just, fair and lega? What
relief the workman concerned is entitled to?
2.
Both the parties were put to notice and workman Sh. Jasvir Singh upon appearance filed statement of claim with
the averments that he was employed as Driver on permanent basis since January 2002. He was drawing a salary of
Rs.4,375/- per month. It has also alleged that service of the workman was terminated on 16.04.2010 without any notice,
enquiry and charge sheet etc. The juniors to the workman are still in service and after the termination of the workman,
other persons has been employed in his place. The workman has challenged his termination to be illegal with the law and
made a prayer for his reinstatement with continuity of service and full back-wages.
3.
The management contested the case of the workman by filing written statement wherein certain preliminary
objections were taken. In Para 3 of the preliminary objections, it is admitted that workman was engaged as casual
workman as a Driver purely on temporary basis as a stop gap arrangement. It is denied that he was employed as Driver
on permanent basis since January 2002. There was no regular appointment of the workman nor the post of Driver was
advertised. No application were invited nor any interview was conducted at the time of his engagement. It is a matter of
record that Branch Manager is not even a competent authority under the Rules to make any appointment of Driver. The
management has also disputed the number of working days. The management admitted that workman has served with a
legal notice dated 24.04.2010 on the management vide Annexure M-1. The management had also filed reply to the said
notice vide Annexure M-2. Kindly prayed has been made for disposal of the prayer.
4.
The workman in support of his case tendered in evidence his affidavit Ex.WW1/A along with document
Ex.WW1/1. There is no cross-examination of the workman as none was present on behalf of the management on
29.05.2018 when the case was listed for evidence of the workman. Resultantly, management was proceeded ex parte.
5.
It is clear from the perusal of the pleadings of the parties as well as of evidence of the workman that he was
engaged by the management as a Driver in January, 2002. The factum of engagement of Sh. Jasvir Singh workman as a
Driver has also been admitted by the management in its written statement as well as other documents. At this stage, it is
appropriate to refer to Para 3 of the preliminary objections made in the written statement filed by the management. It is
clearly admitted that Sh. Jasvir Singh workman i.e. Driver, was engaged as a casual workman purely on temporary basis.
There is also documentary evidence on record which further suggest that Sh. Jasvir Singh workman was in the
employment of the management as a Driver. Before filing the present case, the workman has served management with
legal notice Annexure M-1, wherein all the material facts are mentioned. The management had filed the reply to the
written notice vide Annexure M-2, wherein also it is clearly admitted that workman was engaged by the management-
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940
5407
bank on daily wager, casual basis to met the exigencies. However, no procedure was followed at the time of his
engagement. In Para 3 and 4 of the reply to the legal notice, it is further admitted that no procedure was followed at the
time of his engagement and it was not imperative for the management to give any notice or pay any compensation etc. to
the workman before his termination. This stand has been taken by the management before conciliation officer also.
6.
The Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Devinder Singh Vs. Municipal Council, Sanaur, AIR 2011 SC 2235 while
interpreting the definition of workman as contained in Section 2(S) of the Act rejected the contention of the management
that a casual or daily wager or a temporary employee engaged purely on casual basis is not covered by the definition of
workman. The relevant observations are in Para 13 of the judgment and the same are as under:—
“The source of employment, the method of recruitment, the terms and conditions of employment/contract of
service, the quantum of wages/pay and the mode of payment are not at all relevant for deciding whether or
not a person is a workman within the meaning of Section 2(S)of the Act. The definition of workman also does
not make any distinction between full-time and part-time employee or a person appointed on contract basis.
There is nothing in the plain language of Section 2(S) from which it can be inferred that only a person
employed on regular basis or a person employed for doing whole-time job is a workman and the one
employed on temporary, part-time or contract basis on fixed wages or as a casual employee or for doing duty
for fixed hours is not a workman.”
7.
It is thus, clear from the perusal of the above Para that every type of casual or daily worker is covered by the
definition of workman as contained in Section 2(S) of the Act. Since workman herein was admittedly engaged by the
management as a Driver, as such, he has covered by the definition of the workman under Section 2(S) of the Act.
8.
There is no merit in the stand taken by the management that no regular procedure was followed at the time of
engagement of the workman nor application was invited for the post of Driver. To my mind, the workman herein is not
seeking regularisation or permanent absorption with the management-bank simply because due procedure was not
followed at the time of engagement of the workman herein that would not give licence to the management to terminate
the service of the workman in arbitrary and illegal manner. There are several judgments of the Hon’ble Apex Court that
service of a daily wager or casual workman cannot be terminated without following the due procedure contained in
Section 25-F of the Act. Admittedly, in the present case, no show cause notice was served upon the workman before
ordering his termination nor one month salary in lieu of notice was given in advance to the workman at the time of his
termination. All these facts are duly admitted by the management in the written statement as well as reply to a legal
notice. It has been held in several decisions by the Hon’ble Apex Court as well as various High Courts that termination of
service of a workman, who has served for more than 240 days in a calendar year preceding his termination, will become
arbitrary and illegal unless one month notice or one month salary in lieu of such notice is given to such workman at the
time of his termination. In this regard, reference can be made to the case of Ajay Pal Singh Vs. Haryana Warehouse
Corporation 2056 Supreme Court cases and ONGC 2483 Supreme Court Mechanised Company Vs. Mechanised Union
2004 Supreme Court cases 544. Since in the present case, the management has throw all the norms of natural justice as
well as provisions of ID Act to the winds. As such, the action of the management is held to be totally arbitrary and illegal
under the law.
9.
Now the residual question is whether the workman is entitled for reinstatement of service with back wages.
Admittedly, the workman was not holding any regular post nor any procedure was followed by the management at the
time of his engagement as a Driver. But it is also a fact that management has been engaged him as Driver in this manner,
and workman has put more that 8 years of service.
10.
The Hon’ble Apex Court in case “Deepali Gundu Surwase Vs. Kranti Junior Adhyapak Mahavidyalaya” reported
as (2013) 10 SCC 324 has held as under:
“(i) In case of wrongful termination of service, reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages is the
normal rule.
(ii) Ordinarily, an employee or workman whose services are terminated and who is desirous of getting back
wages is required to either plead or at least make a statement before the adjudicating authority or the Court
of first instance that he was not gainfully employed or was employed on lesser wages. If the employer wants
to avoid payment of full back wages, then I has to plead and also lead cogent evidence to prove that the
workman wads gainfully employed and was getting wages equal to the wages he wads drawing prior to the
termination of service. This is so because it is settled law that the burden of proof of the existence of a
particular fact lies on the person who makes a positive averments about its existence. It is always easier to
prove a positive fact than to prove a negative fact. Therefore, once the employee shows that he was not
employed, the onus lies on the employer to specifically plead and prove that the employee was gainfully
employed and was getting the same or substantially similar emoluments.”
11. Hon’ble Apex Court in the case General Manager, Haryana Roadways Vs. Rudan Singh, reported as 2005 SCC
(L & S) 716 observed as under:—
‘‘There is no rule of thumb that in every case where the Industrial Tribunal gives a finding that the termination
of service was in violation of Section 25-F of the Act, entire back wages should be awarded. A host of factors
5408
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
like the manner and method of selection and appointment i.e. whether after proper advertisement of the vacancy
or inviting applications from the employment exchange, nature of appointment namely, whether ad hoc, short
term, daily wage, temporary or permanent in character, any special qualification required for the job and the
like should be weighed and balanced in taking a decision regarding award of back wages. One of the important
factors which has to be taken into consideration is the length of service, which the workman had rendered
with the employer. If the workman has rendered a considerable period of service and his services are
wrongfully terminated, he may be awarded full or partial back wages keeping in view the fact that at this age
and the qualification possessed by him he may not be in a position to get another employment. However,
where the total length of service rendered by a workman is very small, the award of back wages for the
complete period i.e. from the date of termination till the date of the award, which our experience shows is
often quite large, would be wholly inappropriate. A regular service of permanent character cannot be
compared to short or intermittent daily wage employment though it may be for 240 days in a calendar year.”
12.
The Hon’ble Apex Court while considering the violation of Section 25-F of the Act in Incharge Officer & Anr. V.
Shankar Shetty, (2010) 9 SCC 126: 2010 LLR 1137 and after referred to the various decisions, this Court held that the
relief by way of back wages is not automatic and compensation instead of reinstatement has been held to meet the ends
of justice and it reads as under:—
“2. Should an order of reinstatement automatically follow in a case where the engagement of a daily wager
has been brought to end in violation of Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(for short “the ID
Act”)? The course of the decisions of this Court in recent years has been uniform on the above question.
3. In Jagbir Singh V. Haryana State Agriculture Mktg. Board, (2009) 15 SCC 327, delivering the judgment of
this Court, one of the us (R.M. Lodha, J.) noticed some of the recent decisions of this Court, namely, U.P.
State Brassware Corpn. Ltd. V. Uday Narain Pandey, (2006) 1 SCC 479; Uttaranchal Forest Development
Corpn. V. M.C. Joshi, (2007) 9 SCC 353; State of M.P. v. Lalit Kumar Verma, (2007) 1 SCC 575; M.P.
Admn. V. Tribhuban, (2007) 9 SCC 748; Sita Ram v. Moti Lal Nehru Farmers Training Institute, (2008)5
SCC 75; Jaipur Development Authority v. Ramsahai, (2006) 11 SCC 684; GDA v. Ashok Kumar, (2008) 4
SCC 261 and Mahboob Deepak v. Nagar Panchayat, Gajraula, (2008) 1 SCC 575 and stated as follows:
(Jagbir Singh case (2009) 11 SCC 327, SCC pp. 330 & 335, paras 7 & 14)’’
“7. It is true that the earlier view of this Court articulated in many decisions reflected the legal position that if
the termination of an employee was found to be illegal, the relief of reinstatement with full back-wages would
ordinarily follow. However, in recent past, there has been a shift in the legal position and in a long line of
cases, this Court has consistently taken the view that relief by way of reinstatement with back-wages is not
automatic and may be wholly inappropriate in a given fact situation even though the termination of an
employee is in contravention of the prescribed procedure. Compensation instead of reinstatement has been
held to meet the ends of justice.
14. It would be, thus, seen that by a catena of decisions in recent time, this Court has clearly laid down that
an order of retrenchment passed in violation of Section 25F although may be set aside but an award of
reinstatement should not, however, be automatically passed.”
13.
Yet, in another latest judgment i.e. District Development Officer Vs. Kanti Lal 2018 LLR 225 while considering
the question of reinstatement along with back wages of a daily wager, who have put two and a half years of service, the
Hon’ble Apex Court granted a lump sum compensation of Rs.2.50 lac in lieu of reinstatement. The workman herein was
not holding a regular post of Driver and he was simply engaged as daily wager. Moreover, management has already
employed some other workmen in his place as such, having regard to duration of service, it would be in the interest of
justice and fair play if compensation of Rs.6 lac be awarded as lump sum compensation to the workman. Accordingly,
the reference is answered by holding that action of the management-bank Zonal Manager in terminating the service of
workman Jasvir Singh is unjust, unfair and illegal and a amount of Rs.6 lac is ordered to be paid as lump sum
compensation to the said workman by the management and in case, this amount is not paid within one month from the
date of publication of the award, the workman shall be entitled to the said amount with 6% interest from the date of
making of the reference till realisation. Let copy of the award be sent to the Central Government for publication of the
same as required under Section 17(2) of the Act.
Dated: 30.05.2018
Place: Chandigarh
A. C. DOGRA, Presiding Officer-cum-Link Officer
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940
5409
ubZ fnYyh] 30 vxLr] 2018
dk-vk-1336-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj cSad vkWiQ
cM+kSnk ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn (xqtjkr) ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 192@2004) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks
30-08-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&12013@124@1998&vkbZvkj (ch&II)º
jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 30th August, 2018
S.O. 1336.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 192/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of
Bank of Baroda and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 30.08.2018.
[No. L-12013/124/1998-IR (B-II)]
RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,
Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,
Ahmedabad,
Dated 10th August, 2018
Reference: (CGITA) No. 192/2004
The Branch Manager,
Bank of India,
New Cloth Market Branch, New Cloth,
Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380001
…First Party
V/s
Shri Hitendra Vasudev Vyas,
D-40, Tulsi Kunj Society,
Behind Rajbaugh Society, Ghodasar, Maninagar,
Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
…Second Party
For the First Party No
:
Shri D.C. Gandhi
For the Second Party :
Shri V.J. Patel
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-12013/124/98–
IR(B-II) dated 14.05.1999 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Ahmedabad
(Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of Bank of India, New Cloth Market Branch, Ahmedabad in dismissing
Shri H.V. Vyas, Sub-Staff from the services of the Bank with effect from 23.07.1996 on the alleged charges of
misconduct levelled against him vide charge sheet no. ZO:PR:559 dated 16.12.1993 is legal and justified? If not,
then what relief the concerned workman is entitled to?”
1.
The reference dates back to 14.05.1999 and received on 28.06.1999 from Ministry of Labour and Employment,
New Delhi for adjudication and passing the award.
5410
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2.
In response to the notice issued to the parties, the second party workman H.V. Vyas submitted the statement of
claim Ex. 6 alleging that he has been appointed and working by/with the first party The Branch Manager, Bank of India,
New Cloth Market Branch, New Cloth, Ahmedabad, hereinafter referred to as “Bank of India” as Sub-staff Peon since
the year 1973. He was put under suspension and served with a charge sheet (Ex. 19) on 16.12.1993. In the charge sheet,
the following charges were levelled against him as under:
i.
It is reported that a fraud of Rs.160420.00 has been perpetrated by you in collusion with other staff members
of the Branch in fictitious S/B A/c No. 15352 in the name of one Shri Vinodkumar Prabhudas Gajjar and S/B
A/c No. 15463 in the name of one Shri Surendra Nanji Patel, by fabricating fictitious credit vouchers and
withdrawing funds thereafter and destroying/managing to destroy fictitious credit vouchers/withdrawal forms
etc.
ii.
You, in collusion with other staff members managed to open/got opened the above mentioned fictitious S/B
A/cs with an intention to commit a fraud and misappropriate the Bank’s funds.
iii.
You, in collusion with other staff members of the Branch, further managed to remove temporarily the
genuine P and L Credit vouchers of various heads and surreptitiously replaced these genuine vouchers with
fictitious credit vouchers of the same amount made out for the credit of above mentioned fictitious S/B A/cs,
alleged to have been opened by you in collusion with other staff members of the Branch thereby giving
fictitious and bogus credit entries to the above mentioned S/B A/cs. You thereafter knowingly, wilfully and
fraudulently managed to withdraw funds on various occasions from the above mentioned fictitious S/B A/cs.
You thereafter destroyed/managed to destroy the fake and fictitious vouchers fabricated by you in collusion
with other staff members and once again replaced the original P and L A/C credit vouchers stealthily in the
day’s bunch of vouchers. In order to suppress the fraud from coming to light, you further tempered with the
Bank’s documents and destroyed/managed to destroy all the withdrawal slips/forms drawn in S/B A/c No.
15352 and some of the withdrawal forms/slips drawn on/pertaining to S/B A/c No. 15463 in the name of one
Shri S.N. Patel.
iv.
Preliminary investigation has revealed that the following withdrawal forms available on branch record drawn
on fictitious S/B A/c No. 15463 in the name of S.N. Patel are allegedly filled in/signed in the name of S.N.
Patel by you.
Date
Amount
15.12.1992
Rs.6000/-
03.12.1992
Rs.6000/-
17.12.1992
Rs.1800/-
21.12.1992
Rs.6000/-
23.12.1992
Rs.3000/-
12.02.1993
Rs.4500/-
You have in your statement dated 29.04.1993 given before the Investigating Officer, Shri D. V. Almouls, confessed
having filled in 3 of the above mentioned withdrawal forms/slips i.e. dated 15.12.1992, 21.12.1992 and 12.02.1993 for
Rs.6000/-,Rs.6000/- and Rs.4500/- respectively.
Therefore, he was put under suspension and subjected to departmental enquiry where he was, without giving proper
opportunity of hearing and to defend himself, dismissed, therefore, he has prayed for reinstatement with back wages.
3.
The first party Bank of India vide written statement Ex. 11 has submitted that the second party workman has been
working as Sub-staff Peon in the Bank. During tenure of his duty as Sub-staff Peon at Bank’s New Cloth Market Branch
in the year 1992 and 1993, a fraud was perpetrated by this workman in collusion with other staff members of the branch
in fictitious Saving Bank Account No. 15352 in the name of one V.P. Gajjar and Saving Bank Account No. 15463 in the
name of one S.M. Patel by fabricating fictitious credit vouchers and withdrawing funds thereafter destroying fictitious
credit vouchers and withdrawing funds with an intention to commit fraud and misappropriate the Bank’s money. The
workman further managed to remove the genuine profit and loss vouchers of various heads and surreptitiously placed the
general vouchers with fictitious credit vouchers of the same amount made out for the credit of the above mentioned
fictitious saving bank accounts thereby giving fictitious and bogus credit entries to the above mentioned savings bank
accounts. The workman concerned thereafter knowingly, wilfully and fraudulently managed to withdraw funds on
various occasions from the above mentioned fictitious saving bank accounts and thereafter managed to destroy the face
and fictitious vouchers fabricated by him in collusion with other staff members and again replaced the original profit and
loss account credit vouchers stealthily in the day’s bunch of vouchers. In order to suppress the fraud from coming to
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940
5411
light, the workman concerned further tampered with the bank’s documents and destroyed all the withdrawal slips/forms
drawn on savings bank account no. 15352 and some withdrawal slips pertaining to saving bank account no. 15463.
Therefore, the bank keeping, the charges levelled and proved against the workman, in the mind, first put him under
suspension vide order dated 26.06.1993 and after Charge No. i and iii conclusively proved and Charge No. ii partly
proved, issued him a show cause notice on 10.04.1996 and after providing him an opportunity of personal hearing,
dismissed him from service vide order dated 23.07.1996 as per the bi-partite settlement dated 14.02.1995. The order
provided the workman in option for appeal which the workman availed. The appeal was dismissed and his services were
terminated. During enquiry, personal hearing was given. There was no violation of principle of natural justice. Hence the
prayer sought by the second party in his statement of claim has no force and is liable to be dismissed.
4.
On the basis of the pleadings, the following issues arise:
I.
Whether the action of the management of Bank of India, New Cloth Market Branch, Ahmedabad in
dismissing Shri H.V. Vyas, Sub-Staff from the services of the Bank with effect from 23.07.1996 on the
alleged charges of misconduct levelled against him vide charge sheet no. ZO:PR:559 dated 16.12.1993 is
legal and justified?
II.
To what relief, if any, the concerned employee is entitled?
5.
Issue No. I and II: Both the issues are interrelated, therefore, are to be decided together. The burden of proof of
these issues was lying on the second party workman. As the second party workman did not challenge the legality of the
enquiry report and departmental proceedings, therefore, the Issue No. I stand proved.
6.
The learned counsel for the workman argued on the point of punishment referring Deepali Gundu Surwase V/s
Kranti Junior Adhyapak and others, 2013 (139) FLR 541 SC, wherein the apex court has held that if action taken against
the employee by the employer is found to be ultra-vires, relevant statutory provisions of principle of natural justice by a
competent court and the employee shall be reinstated in the same position in which he was earlier standing. He further
referred Gujarat State Board Transport Corporation V/s D.V. Chauhan, 2006 (2) GLH 64 Full Bench Guj., wherein the
Gujarat High Court has held that the Labour Court or Industrial Tribunal while examining the legality of orders of
penalty other than discharge or dismissal, mere mentioning of Section 11 (a) would not rendered the order of the Tribunal
bad. He further referred State Bank of Bikaner V/s Nemichand Nalwaya, 2011 LLR 634 SC, wherein the apex court has
held that in the matter of disciplinary proceedings, the Court cannot act as an appellant Court to re-assess the evidence
produced in the domestic enquiry. Besides, it also cannot interfere with the ground that any other view is possible on the
basis of material available on record. As and when the punishment has been imposed after holding a disciplinary
proceedings/enquiry, Courts have restricted powers and has a scope to interfere only when the findings were perverse or
based on no evidence or in being violation of the principle of natural justice or statutory regulations. He further referred
Janatha Bazar (South Kanara Central Co-operative Wholesale Stores Limited) V/s Secretary, Sahakari Noukarara
Sangha, 2004 (4) LLN 571 SC, wherein the apex court has held that an employee who was removed from service for a
proved charge of breach of trust and mis-appropriation of money, the High Court and the Labour Court was unjustified to
reinstate him with 25% back wages on the ground that Court has no right or justification to say that the mis-appropriate
amount was small.
7.
It is also noteworthy that the apex Court has repeatedly held that if the legality of the departmental proceedings has
not been challenged then the Tribunal or Court has no locus to stand as an Appellate Court for modifying the punishment
awarded for a proven charge. Thus the Issue No. ii is decided accordingly. No relief can be granted.
8.
Thus the prayer sought by the second party workman has no force and liable to be rejected. The reference is
dismissed and disposed of with the observation that the action taken by the management of the first party, Bank of India,
New Cloth Market Branch, Ahmedabad, in removing the workman H.V. Vyas from service is legal and just.
9.
The award is passed accordingly.
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 30 vxLr] 2018
dk-vk- 1337-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj cSad vkWiQ
cM+kSnk ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn (xqtjkr) ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 827@2004) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks
30-08-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&12011@197@2003&vkbZvkj (ch&II)º
jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
5412
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
New Delhi, the 30th August, 2018
S.O. 1337.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 827/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of
Bank of Baroda and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 30.08.2018.
[No. L-12011/197/2003-IR (B-II)]
RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,
Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,
Ahmedabad,
Dated 14th August, 2018
Reference: (CGITA) No. 827/2004
The Manager,
Bank of Baroda,
Head Office, Mandvi,
Baroda (Gujarat)
…First Party
V/s
The President,
RashtriyaMazdoor Union,
Aram Building, Poolbari Naka, Salatwada,
Baroda (Gujarat) - 390001
…Second Party
For the First Party
:
Shri V.K. Mashar
For the Second Party
:
None
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-12011/197/2003–
IR(B-II) dated 28.11.2003 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in
respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management ofBank of Baroda through the Manager, Bank of Baroda, Jhagadia
Branch, Bharuch and others in terminating the services of Shri DineshkumarShantilalVesava is legal, proper and
justified? If not, what relief the workman Shri Dineshkumar Shantilal Vasava is entitled to and from which date
and what other directions are necessary in the matter?”
1.
The reference dates back to 28.11.2003 and received on 22.12.2003 from Ministry of Labour and Employment,
New Delhi for adjudication and passing the award.
2.
After issuing notice to the parties, the second party submitted the statement of claim Ex. 4 on 23.03.2004 and the
first party submitted the written statement Ex. 6 on 21.10.2004. Since then the second party has been absent and has not
been leading evidence despite giving dozens of opportunities.
3.
Thus it appears that the second partyis not willing to prosecute the case.
4.
Therefore, the reference is disposed of in the absence of the evidence of the second party workman with the
observation as under: “the action of the management of Bank of Baroda through the Manager, Bank of Baroda, Jhagadia
Branch, Bharuch and others in terminating the services of Shri Dineshkumar Shantilal Vesava is legal, proper and
justified.”
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940
5413
ubZ fnYyh] 30 vxLr] 2018
dk-vk- 1338-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj dkanyk iksVZ
VªLV ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn (xqtjkr) ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 25@2015) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks
30-08-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&37011@05@2015&vkbZvkj (ch&II)º
jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 30th August, 2018
S.O. 1338.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 25/2015) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Kandla Port
Trust and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 30.08.2018.
[No. L-37011/05/2015-IR (B-II)]
RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,
Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,
Ahmedabad,
Dated 30th July, 2018
Reference: (CGITA) No. 25/2015
The Chairman,
Kandla Port Trust,
Administrative Building, P.B. No. 50,
Gandhidham (Gujarat) - 370201
…First Party
V/s
The General Secretary,
Transport and Dock Workers’ Union,
21, Yogesh Building, Plot No. 586, 12-C,
Gandhidham (Gujarat) - 370201
…Second Party
For the First Party
:
Shri K.V. Gadhia
For the Second Party
:
Shri N.H. Rathod
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-37011/05/2015–
IR(B-II) dated 24.03.2015 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in
respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of Kandla Port Trust in not removing the discrepancy in the matter of
date of birth of Shri Abhu Hasam, RP Workers 2/SM is just and fair? If not, to what relief is the employee
concerned is entitled?”
1.
The reference dates back to 24.03.2015 and received on 13.04.2015 from Ministry of Labour and Employment,
New Delhi for adjudication.
2.
In response to the notice issued to the parties by the Tribunal, the second party submitted the statement of claim
Ex. 6 on 22.08.2017 alleging that the second party workman hereinafter referred to as “workman” was working with the
first party Kandla Dock Labour Board (KDLB) later notified as Kandla Port Trust since 24.01.2007 as RP Worker 2/SM.
5414
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
He enquired into the office of the first party regarding his date of birth in the official record which was told to be
06.05.1958 while his actual date of birth is 26.02.1961 as per his school leaving certificate, therefore, he moved an
representation in the first party Kandla Port Trust to change his date of birth as stated above which was denied to be
changed by Kandla Port Trust. Therefore, he has prayed for change of date of birth to be recorded as 26.02.1961 in his
service record.
3.
The first party Kandla Port Trust, hereinafter referred to as “KPT” submitted the written statement Ex. 7 on
14.02.2018 stating that the reference is bad in law, time barred and the Tribunal has no jurisdiction to entertain the
reference, therefore, the reference is liable to be rejected. It is further submitted that the second party is not a workman as
defined under Section 2 (s) of the Industrial Disputes Act. The second party has to prove that he was working as RP
Worker with the Kandla Dock Labour Board which later merged into the first party KPT on 24.01.2007. The second
party has also to prove that he enquired from the official record that his date of birth was recorded as 06.05.1958. The
first party vide memorandum no. ADMB/KDLB/1311/1041 dated 13.05.1985 instructed the second party to produce the
documentary evidence regarding his date of birth but the second party workman categorically stated that he does not have
any evidence to support his date of birth and requested to take into consideration the same age as assessed by the Medical
Officer, KPT during his medical examination. Accordingly, the age of second party workman was considered as 29 years
as on 06.05.1987 as per the report of the Medical Officer having Report No. MH/GN/1102/1103/3207. It is also
noteworthy that the present reference has filed in the year 2015 after 28 years and has not explained as to why he has
taken action after such a long delay. Thus the reference is liable to be rejected. The first party vide list Ex. 8 submitted
the zerox copy of aforesaid memorandum, declaration in support of documentary evidence given by the second party
dated 14.05.1987 and certificate of fitness given by the Medical officer dated 05.05.1987.
4.
On the basis of the pleadings, the following issues arise:
I.
Whether the action of the management of Kandla Port Trust in not removing the discrepancy in the matter of
date of birth of Shri Abhu Hasam, RP Workers 2/SM is just and fair?
II.
To what relief, if any, the employee concerned is entitled?
5.
Issue No. I and II: Both the issues are interrelated, therefore, are to be decided together. The second party
workman Abhu Hasam submitted the affidavit Ex. 9 reiterating the averments made in the statement of claim Ex. 6. In
his cross-examination, he has stated that he joined the Kandla Dock Labour Board in the year 1987 which was merged in
Kandla Port Trust in the year 2007 and he has submitted his proof of date of birth while joining the services. He further
stated that he further asked by the Kandla Dock Labour Board on 13.05.1985 to file proof of his date of birth, the same
has been filed by him. He admitted that the document filed by the first party vide list Ex. 8/2 bears his signature which is
the declaration in support of documentary evidence given by the second party dated 14.05.1987. He further stated that he
don’t remember as to whether he was referred to Medical Authorities for ascertaining his age. Kandla Port Trust used to
issue him pay slips but he does not know the pay slips issued bearing date of birth. He made representation before the
authorities of Kandla Port Trust for change in his date of birth but he does not know the date of filing of representation.
The second party submitted his written arguments vide list Ex. 10.
6.
I heard and perused the written arguments of the second party and as well as of the first party. The second party in
his written argument Ex. 10 has referred Titagarh Jute Factory Company Ltd. V/s Sriram Tiwari, 1979 ILLJ 495 Cal.,
wherein it has been observed as under:
“2. When the dispute in question is an Industrial Dispute, the jurisdiction of Civil Court is bared and that the
Court below, therefore, has no jurisdiction to try the present suit. In support of this contention, relevance on
the decision in Premier Automobiles Ltd. V/s Kamalakar Shantaram has been made. In that case the
following principles have been laid down for ascertaining whether the jurisdiction of the Civil Court is barred
or not:
i.
If the dispute is not an Industrial Dispute nor does it relate to the enforcement of any other right under
the Act, remedy lies only in the Civil Court;
ii.
If the dispute is an Industrial Dispute arising out of a right or liability under the general or common law
and not under the Act, the jurisdiction of the Civil Court is alternative, leaving it to the election of the
suitor concerned to choose his remedy for the relief which is competent to be granted in a particular
remedy;
iii.
If the Industrial Dispute relates to the enforcement of a right or an obligation created under the Act,
then the only remedy available to the suit or is to get an adjudication under the Act;
iv.
If the right which is sought to be enforced is a right created under the Act, such as, Chapter VA then
the remedy for its enforcement is either Section 33 C or the raising of an Industrial Dispute, as the case
may be.”
“13. The present dispute as has already been found is an Industrial Dispute. Further, having regard to the nature of
the dispute it may very well be said that the dispute arises out of right or liability under the general and
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940
5415
common law and not under the Act. In the present case, as already stated, the contention of the plaintiff-
opposite party is that he was born on 20.08.1922 and did not as such attain the age of 58 years on 01.08.1977.
In other words, according to him, he would attain the age of 58 years on 20.08.1980. That precisely is the
plaintiff’s case even though he has challenged the applicability of the Clause 13 (c) of the standing orders of
the factory. He has not made out any specific case that he was not to retire on attaining the age of 58 years.
Further it is his case that there is no basis for holding that he was born on 01.08.1919 and accordingly he
could not be required to retire on 01.08.1977. The plaint, therefore, primarily raises the dispute as to whether
the plaintiff was born on 20.08.1922 or 01.08.1919. This is a dispute which may very well be raised before
the Civil Court as much as even though the dispute may be in the nature of an Industrial Dispute there is no
specific provision in the Act barring the jurisdiction of the Civil Court to decide a dispute of the kind raised
in this case. In that view of the matter, it ought to be held that the present suit is maintainable in a Civil
Court.”
“14. Further, the following material observations of the Supreme Court in Premier Automobiles V/s Kamalakar
Shantaram A.I.R. 1975 S.C. 2283 (supra) would also show that the Civil Court’s jurisdiction to entertain a
suit like the present one is not ousted. The relevant observation is as follows:
It would thus be seen that through the intervention of the appropriate Government, of course not directly,
very extensive machinery has been provided for settlement and adjudication of Industrial Disputes. But since
an individual aggrieved cannot approach the Tribunal or the Labour Court-directly for the redress of his
grievance without the intervention of the Government, it is legitimate to take the view that the remedy
provided under the Act is not such as to completely oust the jurisdiction of the Civil Court for trial of
Industrial Disputes. If the dispute is not an Industrial Dispute within the meaning of Section 2 (k) or within
the meaning of Section 2 A of the Act, it is obvious that there is no provision for adjudication of such
disputes under the Act. Civil Courts will be the proper forum. But where the Industrial Dispute is for the
purpose of enforcing any right, obligation or liability under the general law or the common law and not a
right, obligation or liability created under the Act, alternative forums are there giving an election of the suitor
to choose his remedy of either moving the machinery under the Act or to approach the Civil Court. It is plain
that he cannot have both. He has to choose the one or the other.”
7.
The second party further relied on United Bank of India V/s ram Raj Goala (dated 13.09.1979) and The workmen
through The Secretary, Bihar Jasnta Khan Mazdoor Sangh V/s Employer in relation to the management of Sijua Area of
M/s Bharat Coking Coal Limited (LPA No. 249 of 2013) wherein the apex courts has held similar views as stated in
Para 7.
8.
The second party further relied on Shah Nawaz V/s State of Uttar Pradesh and another, (2011) 13 SCC 751,
wherein the apex court has observed that medical opinion from Medical Board should be sought only when matriculation
certificate or school certificate or any birth certificate issued by a corporation or by any Panchayat or Municipality is not
available. He has further relied on Shicaji Malviya V/s Central Bank of India and others 1990 (3) UPLBEC 1652,
wherein the apex court has held as under: “In support of his contention that the High School Certificate is the only
document on which reliability is to be placed for recording the date of birth and no other document can at all be looked
into. If there is any dispute or discrepancy, in that event, the benefit must go to the petitioner.”
9.
The second party further argued that the first party KPT has not leaded any oral evidence to prove contention raised
in the written statement, further no rules or regulations regarding correction of date of birth has placed on record to prove
their contention and only contenting that the employee has made request after a lapse of 28 years, does not invalidate the
reference which is referred by the Government of India for adjudication. It is not fag-end of service. It is to be noted out
that the concerned employee has illegally retired from service meaning thereby, the employee has made an application
sufficient time prior to his so called retirement date. Therefore, the contentions raised by the first party are not proved by
the first party and the same are also contrary to the records.
10.
The first party has referred the Government of India Order, Department of Personnel and Training, O.M.
No. 19017/2/92 Estt. (A) dated 19.05.1993 and dated 16.12.2014 in which the provisions regarding date of birth and its
subsequent alteration which can be made in the Government of India are laid down. The aforesaid office memorandum is
produced as under:
I.
Declaration of Date of Birth: - Every new entrant to Government service should declare his date of birth by
the Christian era at the time of initial appointment with documentary evidence, viz., Matriculation
Certificate, Municipal Birth Certificate.
In the absence of such proof, he may declare approximate age or year or month and year of birth; assumed
date of birth will be arrived at as under:
i.
If the approximate age only is declared, the number of years representing the age declared to be
deducted and the assumed date arrived at.
5416
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ii.
If the year of birth only is declared, assumed date will be 1st July of the year.
iii.
If the month and the year are declared, assumed date will be 16th of that month of the year.
II.
Entry of Date of Birth in Service Records:- The actual date or assumed date of birth determined as above
will be recorded in the Service Book or other Service Records. Once entered, it cannot be altered, without
prior order of Head of Department, except in the case of a clerical error.
III.
Subsequent alteration of Date of Birth:- An alteration of date of birth can be made, with the sanction of a
Ministry/Department or the C. & A. G. in the case of IAAD or an Administrator of a Union Territory, if –
a.
An employee makes a request in this regard within 5 years of his entry into Government Service;
b.
It is clearly established that a genuine bona fide mistake had occurred; and
c.
The date of birth so altered would not make him ineligible to appear in any School or University or
UPSC examination in which he had appeared or for entry into Government service on the date on
which he first appeared at such examination or on the date of entry into Government service.
IV.
Belated claims for alteration in Date of Birth to be rejected:- Government policy regarding rejection of
belated claim for alteration in date of birth is reinforced by the Apex Court judgements in two cases. It will
not be appropriate to consider any request for alteration in date of birth if the conditions stipulated in Para 3
above are not strictly fulfilled.
11.
The Gujarat High Court in Sanjivani Hospital V/s Surat Labour Union, 2016 (1) CLR 1065 has held that the
provisions of the Limitation Act, 1963 do not apply to a reference of an Industrial Disputes but the Tribunal or Labour
Court has to keep in mind that the delay in raising the dispute by the workman must be such as to appear is a live dispute.
The court relied on judgements which are reproduced as under:
“5.5. This Court has considered the reasons recorded by the Labour Court. The Labour Court has recorded that the
delay should not be considered against the workman. The Labour Court has committed error at this stage. In
this regard, reference needs to be made to the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the case of
Assistant Engineer, Rajasthan State Agriculture Marketing Board and Sub-Division Kota V/s Mohan Lal
reported in 2013 III CLR 305 SC : (2013) 14 SCC 543. Para 19 of the said decision reads as under:
“19. We are clearly of the view that though the Limitation Act, 1963 is not applicable to the reference made under
the Industrial Disputes Act but delay in raising industrial dispute is definitely an important circumstance
which the Labour Court must keep in view at the time of exercise of discretion irrespective of whether or not
such objection has been raised by the other side. The legal position laid down by this Court in Gitam Singh
that before exercising its judicial discretion, the Labour Court has to keep in view all relevant factors
including the mode and manner of appointment, length of service, the ground on which termination has been
set aside and the delay in raising industrial dispute before grant of relief in an industrial dispute, must be
invariable followed.”
5.6. Reference can also be made to the subsequent decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in case of
Prabhakar V/s Joint Director Sericulture Department reported in JT 2015 (9) SC 83. Para 26 of thereof reads
as under:
“26. The aforesaid case law depicts the following:
a.
XXXXX
b.
XXXXX
c.
XXXXX
d.
Whether dispute is alive or it has become stale/non-existent at the time when the workman approaches
the appropriate Government is an aspect which would depend upon the facts and circumstances of each
case and there cannot be any hard and fast rule regarding the time for making the order of reference.
5.7. In view of the above proposition of law and the facts noted above, this Court finds that the reasoning adopted
by the Labour Court is unsustainable since the case of the workman himself was to the effect that he ought to
have been continued in service till 05.07.2007 and he raised this dispute in the year 2011. In view of this
delay on the part of the workman, the dispute ceased to be a live dispute when it was raised. No relief could
have been granted to the workman. The impugned award, therefore, needs to be quashed and set aside.”
The court after considering the aforesaid judgements has held that the delay of 4 years on the part of the
workman ceases the Industrial Disputes as live.”
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940
5417
12.
Though the second party has argued that the date of birth is also an Industrial Disputes, therefore, this tribunal has
very much jurisdiction to give the award.
13.
I do not agree with the arguments of the second party because he entered into the service in the year 1987 and has
not explained as to when he came to know his date of birth as 06.05.1958, thus raising the dispute after a lapse of
28 years when he was going to retire and at present, he is retired, the dispute cannot be said to be live. Secondly, he has
concealed the evidence of his date of birth till his retirement, therefore, for a monetary gain, his statement cannot be
believed. Raising the dispute after 8 years reflects his mala-fide for a monetary gain. Thirdly, as per the Government of
India Orders, he would have raised this dispute at the most in the year 2012. But he has not submitted any evidence
which may prove that he moved the representation to KPT in the year 2012. Fourthly, when there is a dispute regarding
date of birth, only the Civil Court has the jurisdiction to declare the changes in date of birth which have a long procedure
and same has not been followed. Thus the second party has failed to prove both the issues.
14.
Thus the reference has no force and decided as under: “the action of the management of Kandla Port Trust in not
removing the discrepancy in the matter of date of birth of Shri Abhu Hasam, RP Workers 2/SM is just and fair.”
15.
No relief can be granted. The award is passed accordingly.
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 30 vxLr] 2018
dk-vk- 1339-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj dkanyk iksVZ
VªLV ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn (xqtjkr) ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 51@2015) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks
30-08-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&37011@07@2015&vkbZvkj (ch&II)º
jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 30th August, 2018
S.O. 1339.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 51/2015) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Kandla Port
Trust and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 30.08.2018.
[No. L-37011/07/2015-IR (B-II)]
RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,
Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,
Ahmedabad,
Dated 30th July, 2018
Reference: (CGITA) No. 51/2015
The Chairman,
Kandla Port Trust,
Administrative Building, P.B. No. 50,
Gandhidham (Gujarat) - 370201
…First Party
V/s
The General Secretary,
Transport and Dock Workers’ Union,
F/3, Aadinath Arcade, Plot No. 586, 12-C,
Gandhidham (Gujarat) - 370201
…Second Party
5418
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
For the First Party
:
Shri K.V. Gadhia
For the Second Party
:
Shri N.H. Rathod
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-37011/07/2015–
IR(B-II) dated 22/28.05.2015 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Central Government Industrial Tribunal,
Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of Kandla Port Trust in not removing the discrepancy in the matter of
date of birth of Shri Satyanarayan, RP Workers 28/SM is justified and legal? If not so, to what relief the
employee concerned is entitled?”
1.
The reference dates back to 22/28.05.2015 and received on 15.06.2015 from Ministry of Labour and Employment,
New Delhi for adjudication.
2.
In response to the notice issued to the parties by the Tribunal, the second party submitted the statement of claim
Ex. 7 on 28.11.2016 alleging that the second party workman hereinafter referred to as “workman” was working with the
first party Kandla Dock Labour Board (KDLB) later notified as Kandla Port Trust since 24.01.2007 as RP Worker
28/SM. He enquired into the office of the first party regarding his date of birth in the official record which was told to be
19.11.1957 while his actual date of birth is 05.10.1960 as per his school leaving certificate, therefore, he moved an
representation in the first party Kandla Port Trust to change his date of birth as stated above which was denied to be
changed by Kandla Port Trust. Therefore, he has prayed for change of date of birth to be recorded as 05.10.1960 in his
service record.
3.
The first party Kandla Port Trust, hereinafter referred to as “KPT” submitted the written statement Ex. 8 on
21.08.2017 stating that the reference is bad in law, time barred and the Tribunal has no jurisdiction to entertain the
reference, therefore, the reference is liable to be rejected. It is further submitted that the second party is not a workman as
defined under Section 2 (s) of the Industrial Disputes Act. The second party has to prove that he was working as RP
Worker 28/SM with the Kandla Dock Labour Board which later merged into the first party KPT on 24.01.2007. The
second party has also to prove that he enquired from the official record that his date of birth was recorded as 19.11.1957.
The second party in his statement of claim Ex. 7 stated his age as 28 years on 19.11.1985, therefore, his date of birth was
taken as 19.11.1957 on the basis of his age. It is also noteworthy that the present reference has filed in the year 2015 after
30 years and has not explained as to why he has taken action after such a long delay. Considering his date of birth as
19.11.1957, he was due to retire in the year 2017. Thus the reference is liable to be rejected.
4.
On the basis of the pleadings, the following issues arise:
I.
Whether the action of the management of Kandla Port Trust in not removing the discrepancy in the matter of
date of birth of Shri Satyanarayan, RP Workers 28/SM is justified and legal?
II.
To what relief, if any, the employee concerned is entitled?
5.
Issue No. I and II: Both the issues are interrelated, therefore, are to be decided together. The second party
Satyanarayan submitted his affidavit Ex. 9 reiterating the averments made in the statement of claim Ex. 7 along with his
school leaving certificate showing his date of birth as 05.10.1960 and the Identification Card of KPT showing his date of
birth as 19.11.1957. Both the documents are zerox copies, though cannot be read under the Evidence Act but as both
admitted, therefore, these documents can be read.
6.
Later the workman submitted the additional affidavit Ex. 11 clarifying that as per his school leaving certificate, his
date of birth is 05.10.1960 and not 19.11.1957 as recorded in the service record. In his cross-examination, he has stated
that he joined Kandla Dock Labour Board in the year 1984. The first party has filed the documents vide list Ex. 10
showing his age in his application as 28 years on 18.11.1985 and in the service record, his date of birth is 19.11.1957.
7.
I heard and perused the written arguments of the second party and as well as of the first party. The second party in
his written argument has referred Titagarh Jute Factory Company Ltd. V/s Sriram Tiwari, 1979 ILLJ 495 Cal., wherein it
has been observed as under:
“2. When the dispute in question is an Industrial Dispute, the jurisdiction of Civil Court is bared and that the
Court below, therefore, has no jurisdiction to try the present suit. In support of this contention, relevance on
the decision in Premier Automobiles Ltd. V/s Kamalakar Shantaram has been made. In that case the
following principles have been laid down for ascertaining whether the jurisdiction of the Civil Court is barred
or not:
i.
If the dispute is not an Industrial Dispute nor does it relate to the enforcement of any other right under
the Act, remedy lies only in the Civil Court;
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940
5419
ii.
If the dispute is an Industrial Dispute arising out of a right or liability under the general or common law
and not under the Act, the jurisdiction of the Civil Court is alternative, leaving it to the election of the
suitor concerned to choose his remedy for the relief which is competent to be granted in a particular
remedy;
iii.
If the Industrial Dispute relates to the enforcement of a right or an obligation created under the Act,
then the only remedy available to the suit or is to get an adjudication under the Act;
iv.
If the right which is sought to be enforced is a right created under the Act, such as, Chapter VA then
the remedy for its enforcement is either Section 33 C or the raising of an Industrial Dispute, as the case
may be.”
“13. The present dispute as has already been found is an Industrial Dispute. Further, having regard to the nature of
the dispute it may very well be said that the dispute arises out of right or liability under the general and
common law and not under the Act. In the present case, as already stated, the contention of the plaintiff-
opposite party is that he was born on 20.08.1922 and did not as such attain the age of 58 years on 01.08.1977.
In other words, according to him, he would attain the age of 58 years on 20.08.1980. That precisely is the
plaintiff’s case even though he has challenged the applicability of the Clause 13 (c) of the standing orders of
the factory. He has not made out any specific case that he was not to retire on attaining the age of 58 years.
Further it is his case that there is no basis for holding that he was born on 01.08.1919 and accordingly he
could not be required to retire on 01.08.1977. The plaint, therefore, primarily raises the dispute as to whether
the plaintiff was born on 20.08.1922 or 01.08.1919. This is a dispute which may very well be raised before
the Civil Court as much as even though the dispute may be in the nature of an Industrial Dispute there is no
specific provision in the Act barring the jurisdiction of the Civil Court to decide a dispute of the kind raised
in this case. In that view of the matter, it ought to be held that the present suit is maintainable in a Civil
Court.”
“14. Further, the following material observations of the Supreme Court in Premier Automobiles V/s Kamalakar
Shantaram A.I.R. 1975 S.C. 2283 (supra) would also show that the Civil Court’s jurisdiction to entertain a
suit like the present one is not ousted. The relevant observation is as follows:
It would thus be seen that through the intervention of the appropriate Government, of course not directly,
very extensive machinery has been provided for settlement and adjudication of Industrial Disputes. But since
an individual aggrieved cannot approach the Tribunal or the Labour Court-directly for the redress of his
grievance without the intervention of the Government, it is legitimate to take the view that the remedy
provided under the Act is not such as to completely oust the jurisdiction of the Civil Court for trial of
Industrial Disputes. If the dispute is not an Industrial Dispute within the meaning of Section 2 (k) or within
the meaning of Section 2 A of the Act, it is obvious that there is no provision for adjudication of such
disputes under the Act. Civil Courts will be the proper forum. But where the Industrial Dispute is for the
purpose of enforcing any right, obligation or liability under the general law or the common law and not a
right, obligation or liability created under the Act, alternative forums are there giving an election of the suitor
to choose his remedy of either moving the machinery under the Act or to approach the Civil Court. It is plain
that he cannot have both. He has to choose the one or the other.”
8.
The second party further relied on United Bank of India V/s Ram Raj Goala (dated 13.09.1979) and The workmen
through The Secretary, Bihar Jasnta Khan Mazdoor Sangh V/s Employer in relation to the management of Sijua Area of
M/s Bharat Coking Coal Limited (LPA No. 249 of 2013) wherein the apex courts has held similar views as stated in
Para 7.
9.
The second party further relied on Shah Nawaz V/s State of Uttar Pradesh and another, (2011) 13 SCC 751,
wherein the apex court has observed that medical opinion from Medical Board should be sought only when matriculation
certificate or school certificate or any birth certificate issued by a corporation or by any Panchayat or Municipality is not
available. He has further relied on Shicaji Malviya V/s Central Bank of India and others 1990 (3) UPLBEC 1652,
wherein the apex court has held as under: “In support of his contention that the High School Certificate is the only
document on which reliability is to be placed for recording the date of birth and no other document can at all be looked
into. If there is any dispute or discrepancy, in that event, the benefit must go to the petitioner.”
10.
The second party further argued that the first party KPT has not leaded any oral evidence to prove contention raised
in the written statement, further no rules or regulations regarding correction of date of birth has placed on record to prove
their contention and only contenting that the employee has made request after a lapse of 30 years, does not invalidate the
reference which is referred by the Government of India for adjudication. It is not fag-end of service. It is to be noted out
that the concerned employee has illegally retired from service w.e.f. 30.11.2017 meaning thereby, the employee has
made an application sufficient time prior to his so called retirement date. Therefore, the contentions raised by the first
party are not proved by the first party and the same are also contrary to the records.
5420
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
11.
The first party has referred the Government of India Order, Department of Personnel and Training, O.M. No.
19017/2/92 Estt. (A) dated 19.05.1993 and dated 16.12.2014 in which the provisions regarding date of birth and its
subsequent alteration which can be made in the Government of India are laid down. The aforesaid office memorandum is
produced as under:
I.
Declaration of Date of Birth: - Every new entrant to Government service should declare his date of birth by
the Christian era at the time of initial appointment with documentary evidence, viz., Matriculation
Certificate, Municipal Birth Certificate.
In the absence of such proof, he may declare approximate age or year or month and year of birth; assumed
date of birth will be arrived at as under:
i.
If the approximate age only is declared, the number of years representing the age declared to be
deducted and the assumed date arrived at.
ii.
If the year of birth only is declared, assumed date will be 1st July of the year.
iii.
If the month and the year are declared, assumed date will be 16th of that month of the year.
II.
Entry of Date of Birth in Service Records:- The actual date or assumed date of birth determined as above
will be recorded in the Service Book or other Service Records. Once entered, it cannot be altered, without
prior order of Head of Department, except in the case of a clerical error.
III.
Subsequent alteration of Date of Birth:- An alteration of date of birth can be made, with the sanction of a
Ministry/Department or the C. & A. G. in the case of IAAD or an Administrator of a Union Territory, if –
a.
An employee makes a request in this regard within 5 years of his entry into Government Service;
b.
It is clearly established that a genuine bona fide mistake had occurred; and
c.
The date of birth so altered would not make him ineligible to appear in any School or University or
UPSC examination in which he had appeared or for entry into Government service on the date on
which he first appeared at such examination or on the date of entry into Government service.
IV.
Belated claims for alteration in Date of Birth to be rejected:- Government policy regarding rejection of
belated claim for alteration in date of birth is reinforced by the Apex Court judgements in two cases. It will
not be appropriate to consider any request for alteration in date of birth if the conditions stipulated in Para 3
above are not strictly fulfilled.
12.
The Gujarat High Court in Sanjivani Hospital V/s Surat Labour Union, 2016 (1) CLR 1065 has held that the
provisions of the Limitation Act, 1963 do not apply to a reference of an Industrial Disputes but the Tribunal or Labour
Court has to keep in mind that the delay in raising the dispute by the workman must be such as to appear is a live dispute.
The court relied on judgements which are reproduced as under:
“5.5. This Court has considered the reasons recorded by the Labour Court. The Labour Court has recorded that the
delay should not be considered against the workman. The Labour Court has committed error at this stage. In this
regard, reference needs to be made to the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Assistant
Engineer, Rajasthan State Agriculture Marketing Board and Sub-Division Kota V/s Mohan Lal reported in 2013 III
CLR 305 SC : (2013) 14 SCC 543. Para 19 of the said decision reads as under:
“19. We are clearly of the view that though the Limitation Act, 1963 is not applicable to the reference made
under the Industrial Disputes Act but delay in raising industrial dispute is definitely an important
circumstance which the Labour Court must keep in view at the time of exercise of discretion irrespective of
whether or not such objection has been raised by the other side. The legal position laid down by this Court in
Gitam Singh that before exercising its judicial discretion, the Labour Court has to keep in view all relevant
factors including the mode and manner of appointment, length of service, the ground on which termination
has been set aside and the delay in raising industrial dispute before grant of relief in an industrial dispute,
must be invariable followed.”
5.6. Reference can also be made to the subsequent decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in case of
Prabhakar V/s Joint Director Sericulture Department reported in JT 2015 (9) SC 83. Para 26 of thereof reads as
under:
“26. The aforesaid case law depicts the following:
a.
XXXXX
b.
XXXXX
c.
XXXXX
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940
5421
d.
Whether dispute is alive or it has become stale/non-existent at the time when the workman
approaches the appropriate Government is an aspect which would depend upon the facts and
circumstances of each case and there cannot be any hard and fast rule regarding the time for
making the order of reference.
5.7. In view of the above proposition of law and the facts noted above, this Court finds that the reasoning adopted
by the Labour Court is unsustainable since the case of the workman himself was to the effect that he ought to have
been continued in service till 05.07.2007 and he raised this dispute in the year 2011. In view of this delay on the
part of the workman, the dispute ceased to be a live dispute when it was raised. No relief could have been granted
to the workman. The impugned award, therefore, needs to be quashed and set aside.”
The court after considering the aforesaid judgements has held that the delay of 4 years on the part of the workman
ceases the Industrial Disputes as live.”
13.
Though the second party has argued that the date of birth is also an Industrial Disputes, therefore, this tribunal has
very much jurisdiction to give the award.
14.
I do not agree with the arguments of the second party because he entered into the service in the year 1985 and has
not explained as to when he came to know his date of birth as 19.11.1957, thus raising the dispute after a lapse of 30
years when he was going to retire and at present, he is retired, the dispute cannot be said to be live. Secondly, he has
concealed the evidence of his date of birth till his retirement, therefore, for a monetary gain, his statement cannot be
believed. Thirdly, he has filed the Identification Card of KPT which shows his date of birth as 19.11.1957 but he has not
revealed when this Identification Card was issued. I can presume that the Identification Card would have been issued
when the Kandla Dock Labour Board was merged into Kandla Port Trust on 24.01.2007. Raising the dispute after 8 years
reflects his mala-fide for a monetary gain. Fourthly, as per the Government of India Orders, he would have raised this
dispute at the most in the year 2012. But he has not submitted any evidence which may prove that he moved the
representation to KPT in the year 2012. Fifthly, when there is a dispute regarding date of birth, only the Civil Court has
the jurisdiction to declare the changes in date of birth which have a long procedure and same has not been followed. Thus
the second party has failed to prove both the issues.
15.
Thus the reference has no force and decided as under: “the action of the management of Kandla Port Trust in not
removing the discrepancy in the matter of date of birth of Shri Satyanarayan, RP Workers 28/SM is justified and legal.”
16.
No relief can be granted. The award is passed accordingly.
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 30 vxLr] 2018
dk-vk- 1340-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj dkanyk iksVZ
VªLV ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn (xqtjkr) ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 78@2005) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks
30-08-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&37011@1@2004&vkbZvkj (ch&II)º
jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 30th August, 2018
S.O. 1340.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 78/2005) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Kandla Port
Trust and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 30.08.2018.
[No. L-37011/1/2004-IR (B-II)]
RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,
Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,
5422
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Ahmedabad,
Dated 13th August, 2018
Reference: (CGITA) No. 78/2005
The Chairman,
Kandla Port Trust,
Administrative Office, P.B. No. 50,
Gandhidham, Kutch (Gujarat) - 370201
…First Party
V/s
The General Secretary,
Transport and Dock Workers’ Union,
Room No. 21, Yogesh Building,
Ward No. 12-C, Plot No. 586,
Gandhidham, Kutch (Gujarat) - 370201
…Second Party
For the First Party
:
Shri K.V. Gadhia
For the Second Party
:
Shri N.H. Rathod
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-37011/1/2004–
IR(B-II) dated 21.06.2004 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in
respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of Kandla Port Trust, Gandhidham in not regularising the services of
Shri Khetsi Ratila, Daily Rated Plumber is legal and justified? If not, what relief the workman concerned is
entitled to?”
1.
The reference dates back to 21.06.2004 and received on 22.09.2005 from Ministry of Labour and Employment,
New Delhi for adjudication and passing the award.
2.
After issuing notice to the parties, the second party submitted the statement of claim Ex. 6 on 17.04.2009 and the
first party submitted the written statement Ex. 13 on 02.11.2015.
3.
The second party workman in his statement of claim Ex. 6 has alleged that KhetsiRatila was appointed as
appointed as Daily Rated Plumber by the first party Kandla Port Trust on 05.06.1995 in its Civil Engineering Department
where he worked on the said assignment till 09.10.2005. The workman made number of requests to the first party for
regularising his service as he has been working since last several years continuously on a vacant permanent post but the
said request was not considered by the first party favourably despite the fact that he worked for more than 240 days in
number of preceding calendar years. Therefore, the second party union The General Secretary, Transport & Dock
Workers Union, Room No. 21, Yogesh Building, Ward 12 C, Plot No. 586, Gandhidham, Kutch, raised an industrial
dispute before the Conciliation Officer but the matter could not been resolved. Due of failure of the conciliation, the
Conciliation Officer referred the matter to Government of India. The Government of India send the present reference to
this Tribunal for adjudication. The workman on the basis of the averments made in the statement of claim prayed for
regularisation of service with Rs.10000/- as legal expenses.
4.
The first party Kandla Port Trust vide his written statement Ex. 13 denying the claim of the workman as stated in
the statement of claim submitted that the workman was not appointed as per the recruitment rules of the Kandla Port
Trust. The reference is time barred, bad in law and prayer made in the statement of claim is beyond the terms of
reference. Therefore, the reference is liable to be dismissed. It is further submitted that the apex court has held that no
workman can be regularised without following the procedure laid down under Article 14, 16 and 309 of the Constitution
of India. Therefore, the reference is liable to be decided against the workman being the prayer beyond the scope of
reference.
5.
During the course of proceedings, the workman died on 09.10.2005, therefore, on moving application Ex. 12 by the
legal heirs of the deceased workman, the legal heirs the wife of the deceased workman namely Bhavnaben Khetsi Ratila,
son Deepak Khetsi Ratila and daughter Bhumika Khetsi Ratila were substituted in place of the deceased workman.
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940
5423
6.
On the basis of the pleadings, the following issues arise:
I.
Whether the action of the management of Kandla Port Trust, Gandhidham in not regularising the services of
Shri Khetsi Ratila, Daily Rated Plumber is legal and justified?
II.
To what relief, if any, the concerned employee is entitled?
7.
Issue No. I and II: Both the issues are interrelated, therefore, are to be decided together. The burden of proof of
these issues was lying on the second party workman. The wife of the deceased workman Bhavnaben Khetsi Ratila
submitted her affidavit Ex. 14 to prove the case reiterating the averments made in the statement of claim. The first party
did not lead any evidence. During the course of argument, Advocate Shri M.K. Patel/ M/s K.V. Gadhia Associates, for
the first party orally stated that all the dues to the tune of Rs.23015/- (Rupees Twenty Three Thousand Fifteen)
admissible to the second party workman at the time of his death shall be paid by the first party. As the second party
workman has died, therefore, no question of regularisation arises. The advocate for the second party Shri Nirdosh H.
Rathod, has agreed for the proposal of the advocate of the first party Shri M.K. Patel paying of Rs.23015/- to the legal
heirs of the deceased workman. Therefore, no finding is required on both the issues. The reference is disposed of
accordingly.
8.
The first party Kandla Port Trust shall pay the aforesaid amount as early as possible to the legal heirs of the
deceased workman Khetsi Ratila from the date of publication of the award.
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 30 vxLr] 2018
dk-vk- 1341-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj ikjknhi iksVZ
VªLV ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] Hkqous'oj ds iapkV felysfu;l dsl (lanHkZ la- 25@2017) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 30-08-
2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&39025@01@2017&vkbZvkj (ch&II)º
jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 30th August, 2018
S.O. 1341.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. Misc. Case No. 25/2017) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-
cum-Labour Court, Bhubaneswar as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of
Paradip Port Trust and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 30.08.2018.
[No. L-39025/01/2017-IR (B-II)]
RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, BHUBANESWAR
Present:
Shri B.C. Rath,
Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-cum-Labour
Court, Bhubaneswar
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE MISC. CASE NO. 25/2017
(Filed under Section 33 (1)(A) of the Industrial Disputes Act)
Date of Passing Order – 18th April, 2018
Between:
The General Secretary,
Paradip Port Workers’ Union,
At./Po. Paradip, Dist. Jagatsinghpur,
Odisha – 754 142.
…Applicant-Union
5424
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(And)
The Chairman,
Paradeep Port Trust, At./Po. Paradeep,
Dist. Jagatsinghpur, Odisha – 754 142
…Opp. Party
Appearances:
M/s. Sanjat Das, Advocate
…
For the Applicant-Union
M/s. G. Pujari, Advocate
...
For the Opp. Party
AWARD
This award is directed against an application under section 33-A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (herein after
referred to as “The Act”) preferred by the General Secretary, Paradip Port Trust Workers Union.
2.
The case of the applicant-Union, in short, is that the appropriate government has referred a dispute between the
parties for its adjudication vide notification dated 18.4.2016 which is pending for disposal in this Tribunal vide I.D. Case
No. 25/2016. The schedule of the reference is 1. “Whether the demand of the Union to fill up of 5% direct recruitment
including accumulated backlog vacancies amongst the compassionate aspirants since 2001 in the cadre of Class-II & IV
employees by the management of Paradip Port Trust is legal and/or justified. If not so, what relief the workmen are
entitled to? 2. Whether the demand of the Union to regularize the services of all compassionate appointees/aspirants of
the deceased employees engaged through different contractors of the management is tenable and justified? If not so,
what relief the workmen are entitled to?” When such a dispute is pending for adjudication, the Opp. Party-Management
made newspaper advertisements inviting applications from willing candidates to fill-up certain vacancies in different
categories in its establishment. It is the claim of the applicant-Union that such action of the Management during
pendency of the dispute vide I.D. Case No. 25/2016 amounts to an unfair labour practice as enumerated in Chapter VB of
the Act and the same contravenes the provisions of Section 33(1) of the Act. The initiation of the recruitment process
would change the condition of service of the workmen, who are the aspirants for an appointment under compassionate
scheme. Any attempt on the part of the Opp. Party-Management in filling up the vacancies would deprive the legitimate
claim of the legal heirs of the deceased workmen to be appointed on compassionate ground and as such the Opp. Party-
Management shall be restrained from going ahead with the recruitment process till disposal/adjudication of the dispute
raised vide I.D. Case No. 25/2016.
3.
The Opp. Party-Management has resisted the application on a contention that the same is not maintainable as it is
not filed by the aggrieved workman or espoused by the Union-applicant being authorized by such aggrieved workman.
An application under section 33-A can only be filed in case of violation of condition of service of such employee during
the pendency of an industrial dispute in which the applicant is the concerned employee and the violation must have some
relevancy to the dispute pending for adjudication. It is the stand of the Opp. Party-Management that the applicant on
whose behalf the petition under section 33-A has been moved by the Union is not the workman of the Opp. Party-
Management, as they are aspirant for a job under the Opp. Party-Management under a compassionate scheme and as
such, question does not arise violation of service condition of such person. The alleged action of the Management does
not also constitute any contravention as contemplated under the provisions of Section 33 of the Act. Thus, the Opp.
Party-Management has forcefully submitted for dismissal of the application on account of the same being devoid of any
merit as well as not maintainable in the eye of law.
4.
The parties have not adduced any sort of evidence and advanced their arguments in support of their pleadings made
in their statements.
5.
Keeping in view the pleadings and submissions advanced by the parties the points for consideration are (i) whether
the present application espoused through the 2nd party-Union is maintainable in the eye of law; (ii) whether the action of
the Management in taking recruitment process to fill-up the different categories of vacancies during the pendency of the
reference No. I.D. 25/2016 is a violation of condition of service as enumerated in Section 33 of the Act and (iii) to what
relief the applicant is entitled to, if there was a contravention of the provisions of Section 33 of the Act.
6.
It is not disputed that in the event of a reference made by the Central Government by exercising its authority under
sub section 2-A of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, a dispute with the schedule mentioned earlier is
pending for adjudication in the Tribunal. Admittedly, the Opp. Party has issued an advertisement annexed to the
application under section 33-A of the Act during pendency of such dispute. Further-more, the present application is
espoused through the Union and there is no authorization on behalf of any aspirant appointees to present the application
under section 33-A of the Act. A bare perusal of the provisions of Section 33-A clearly reveals that the Section is
attracted when the following condition precedents are satisfied. (i) There should have been a contravention by the
management, of the provisions of Section 33 of the Act, (ii) The aforesaid contravention should have been during the
pendency of the proceedings before labour court, industrial tribunal etc. as the case may be; (iii) the complainant should
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940
5425
have been aggrieved by the contravention; and (iv) the application should have been made to the authority before whom
the case is pending. Further, the Section provides – “where an employer contravenes the provisions of Section 33 during
pendency of the proceedings (before a Conciliation Officer, Board, and Arbitrator, Labour Court, Tribunal or National
Tribunal) any employee aggrieved by such contravention, may make a complaint in writing (in the prescribed
manner.....” Hence, the right to complain against the contravention of Section 33 has been conferred on the employee
aggrieved by such contravention. As per the settled principle enunciated in the case of National Power Supply
Corporation Limited –versus – State of Assam (1963) II LLJ 10 such aggrieved employee has only the right to make an
application under section 33-A of the Act. A registered trade Union, of which such aggrieved employee is a member, has
no right to make such an application unless it has been authorized to do so by the aggrieved person. Coming to the case
at hand no authorization from the persons aggrieved by the action of the Management is filed and as such doubt can be
entertained towards maintainability of the application on account of the same not being preferred by the aggrieved
employee or on his authorization.
7.
Coming to the issue whether the action of the Management in taking recruitment process amounts to any
contravention as contemplated under section 33 of the Act. A mere reading of Section 33 clearly indicates that the
contravention must be related to change of service condition. The alleged action of the Management is not covered by the
conditions of service enlisted in the fourth schedule for which notice is to be given under section 9-A of the Act.
Similarly the action cannot be termed as unfair labour practice in view of the description of the actions enlisted in the
fifth schedule termed as unfair labour practice. As per the requirements of Section 33-A the basic question that falls to be
considered by this Tribunal whether there has been a contravention by the Opp. Party-Management of the provisions of
Section 33 and it is only in case it is found that there has been a contravention then the Tribunal has the authority to
adjudicate the dispute raised in the complaint preferred under Section 33-A of the Act. Before giving any relief to an
aggrieved employee under this provision it has to be determined whether the Opp. Party-Management’s action fell within
one of the blanket prohibition of Section 33. If the dispute pending adjudication has nothing to do with the alteration in
condition of service complained off and if the alternation is not to the prejudice of the workman, the application under
Section 33-A is wholly incompetent. In the case at hand there is no serious dispute that the persons alleged to have been
aggrieved by the action of the Management are aspirants for appointment under compassionate scheme and as such they
cannot be termed as employee of the Management. When their claim for compassionate appointment is yet to be acceded
to, question does not arise to treat them as aggrieved employee. Their claims to be appointed on compassionate ground
are yet to be decided. Hence, at this stage they cannot be said workmen/employee of the Opp. Party-Management and as
such no scope is available to hold them aggrieved employee. In the above facts and circumstances, the alleged action of
the Management cannot be counted a contravention as contemplated under section 33 of the Act. That apart, law is also
well settled that every contravention of Section 33 does not fall within the scope of Section 33-A and the mere fact that a
reference is pending, does not by itself entitle an employee to invoke Section 33-A of the Act.
8.
For the reasons mentioned above, the Misc. Case under section 33-A is devoid of any merit and accordingly the
application is rejected. The award is to be notified as per the provisions of the Act.
Dictated & Corrected by me.
B. C. RATH, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 30 vxLr] 2018
dk-vk- 1342-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj ,e@,l
fgekpy xzkeh.k cSad ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky; la- 2] paMhx<+ ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 977@2005) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks
30-08-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&12011@7@95&vkbZvkj (ch&I)º
ch- ,l- fc"V] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 30th August, 2018
S.O. 1342.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 977/2005) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court No. 2, Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s.
Himachal Gramin Bank and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 30.08.2018.
[No. L-12011/7/95-IR (B-I)]
B. S. BISHT, Section Officer
5426
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ANNEXURE
BEFORE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH
ID No. 977/2005
Himchal Gramin Bank Karamchari Sangh,
47/9, Bangla Mohalla,
Mandi (HP)
Through its General Secretary
…Workmen/Claimants
Versus
M/s Himachal Gramin Bank,
H.O. Mandi,
Himachal Pradesh
…Management/ Respondent
AWARD
In the present case, matter was referred to Central Government Industrial Tribunal, Chandigarh vide letter No.L-
12011/7/95/IR(B) dated 19.08.1997 under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(in short the Act) for adjudication of an industrial dispute, terms of which are as under:—
‘Whether the action of management of Himachal Gramin Bank, Head Office,Mandi ( (HP) in not regularizing
the services of 108 messenger for the period of their continuous employment in the Bank and not paying them
salary of a regular messenger for the period of their service prior to regularization is legal and justified. If not to
what relief the workmen are entitled to and from which date ?
2.
Both parties were put to notice and 108 Workmen namely Devi Saran and others filed statement of claim through
General Secretary of the Himachal Gramin Bank Karamchari Sangh. As per the averments made in the claim petition,
the workmen were appointed as Messengers during the period from 19-11-87 to 12/6/1996 as detailed in Annexure-A of
the claim petition, at different places at Himachal Pradesh and were required to work for full day as regular employees
but were paid a fix amount of Rs.50 to Rs.500/- from time to time. They were treated as daily rated workman and their
duties were to open the bank one hour before its start and to remain in the bank till its closing; carrying of ledger/dak
etc.from one table to another, to clean the bank counters, chairs,tables etc. assisting the customers in filling the vouchers,
stitching of vouchers and maintain old records. The workmen through their union served upon the Management a
demand notice dated 17./10/94 in respect of their demands for removal of pay anomalies; regularization and uniform
transfer policy. Due to regular demand of the employees of the bank situated all over India, the Govt. of India vide its
letter dated 8/10/94 issued instructions to RBI to create posts of Messengers on regular basis and pursuant thereto, the
Chairman of the Management Bank issued a circular dated 19/10/1994 to regularize the services of the Messengers
working in different places in Himachal Pradesh. It is alleged that the Management with malafide intention did not
regularize the services of the Messengers/workmen in the year 1994 rather their services were regularized in the year
1987, whereas in other Banks in the country the Messengers were regularized with effect from the date of their actual
appointment with the concerned bank. The workmen filed a writ petition before Hon’ble Supreme Court on 16/9/82,
1985 and 1989 regarding equal pay and service conditions of Messengers and the Apex Court directed the Govt. to
constitute a Tribunal & referred the case of the applicants regarding equal pay with their counterpart working with other
nationalized bank and service conditions of Messengers. The Govt. of India constituted a National Industrial Tribunal
having its Headquarter at Hyderabad. The said Tribunal gave an Award dated 30/4/1990 that the services of all the so
called Messengers be regularized with effect from the date of their actual appointment and they be also entitled to regular
pay scale, allowances and other benefits. Since then the workmen through their Union are regularly demanding the
implementation of the Award but no action has been taken by the Management, whereas Jaipur Nagaur, Anchalink Bank
have regularized the services of the messengers from the date of their actual appointment. Hence, the prayer has been
made for declaring the action of the Management to be illegal, wrongful and unfair labour practice and that the workmen
whose details are given in Annexur-A be ordered to be regularized from the date of their appointment, with continuity of
service and that the workmen be awarded regular pay sale w.e.f. 1/9/1987 as per NIT Award.
3.
Management has resisted the claim of the Workman and filed written reply, taking preliminary objections that the
present claim is barred under law of limitation as the NIT Award was passed on 30/4/1990 and that the workmen were
paid wages according to their terms and conditions of engagement. The workmen can not claim regularization and pay
scale at par with Himachal Govt.employees. On merits it is stated that just and genuine demands of the workmen were
accepted . Since the Management has not framed any policy regarding regularization of the workmen, they are not
entitled to the relief claimed by them. Prayer has been made for dismissal of claim petition.
4.
Rejoinder was filed on behalf of the workmen/claimants, whereby the case as set up in the claim petition has been
reiterated and allegations made in the written statement have been denied.
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940
5427
5.
The Claimants in support of their case examined Shri Dharam Chand as W.W.1 and tendered his affidavits
Ex.WW1/1 and Ex.WW1/2 and relied on the documents filed alongwith his affidavit Ex.WW1/2. He testified that the
persons whose names find mentioned in the List Mark-A are the employees f the Management working in different
places and they are performing full time job for the Management. The workmen had made representations about the
duties performed by them, to the Management and copy of the same has been filed on record as Annexure P-11 In cross
examination while denying the suggestion that all the 108 workmen in reference had been employed as part time
sweepers, the witness volunteered that the workmen had been employed as messengers but he failed to show any
appointment letter. He denied the suggestion that workmen used to work only for 2 hours a day as per requirement. He
clarified that the workmen were being paid wages as per circular Ex.P-21 of his affidavit. He showed his ignorance that
wages of workmen were revised vide circular Ex.M-3 and re-revised as per circular Ex.M-4 and Ex.M-5. He denied the
suggestion that the workmen did not make any representation to the Management about their wages before 1987 and that
is why no such representation has been filed on record. The witness was cross examined at length regarding constitution
of the Union and about membership of the workmen as also the authority of the witness to depose in the case but nothing
incriminating was brought on the record.
6.
On the other hand, the Management in order to rebut the case of the claimant examined one Shri Girija Shankar
Gaur (MW1), who retired as Chief Manager from the Head Office of the Management Bank on 30/9/2013. He filed his
affidavit Ex.M-3 whereby he stated that the casual/part time workers working in the Bank before the year 1990 used to
perform misc. work like fetching water, cleaning and dusting branch premises, fixture, furniture etc during the limited
period for which they were engaged as per direction of Head Office of the Bank as circulated from time to time.
According to him, such casual/part time workers were being paid wages according to the circulars viz. circular dated
4/6/1983, 15/9/83, 15/7/86 and 8/4/87. He never came across any case in the Bank where casual/ part time worker was
working for whole day. In cross examination, he deposed that he joined at Mandi and thereafter was transferred to
branch office Gaggal, where Chottu Ram was working as Safai Karamchari at that time Bank had issued circular P-21
and it was not the duty of Safai Karamchari to open the bank, to supply drinking water to the staff and to carry the dak.
He stated that the circulars which finds mentioned in his affidavit were brought to the notice of the employees but he did
not produce any record relating to those circulars. He did not remember whether bank had provided bicycle to the said
Safai Karamchari. He admitted that no timing hours were given to the workmen and no notice was served on the
workmen for changing the service conditions. He denied the suggestion that work was taken from Chhotu Ram for
7 hours (per day) but admitted that the bank did not employee any other Peon except the said Peon.
7.
From the pleadings and evidence adduced on record by the parties, it is manifest that 108 Nos. of workmen
(whose particulars are detailed in the list Mark-A) were engaged by the Management as Messengers at different bank
branches at Himachal Pradesh and they were performing misc. duties as per requirement. According to the
Management, they were working just as casual//part time workers. As such, it clearly establishes relationship of
employer-employee between the Management and claimant. In this regard, reference can be made to the decision in the
case of Devinder Singh Vs. Municipal Council, Sanaur, AIR 2011 Supreme Courtt 2532, wherein the Hon’ble Apex
Court while interpreting the provisions of Section 2(S) of the Act which deals with the definition of “workman” has
observed as under :—
“The source of employment, the quantum of recruitment, the terms & conditions of employment/ contract of
service, the quantum of wages/ pay and mode of payment are not at all relevant for deciding whether or not a
person is a workman within the meaning of Section 2(s) of the Act. The definition of workman also does not
make any distinction between full time and part time employee or a person appointed on contract basis. There
is nothing in the plain language of Section 2(s) from which it can be inferred that only person employed on
regular basis or a person employed for doing whole time job is a workman and the one employed on temporary,
part time or contract basis on fixed wages or as a casual employee or for doing duty for fixed hours is not a
workman.”
It is clear from the perusal of aforesaid observations that even if a person is engaged on temporary, part time or
contract basis or for doing any other kind of work and is duly paid wages for the said work, in that eventuality such a
person would be covered by the definition of “workman” as provided in Section 2(S) of the Act.
8.
As discussed above, in the case in hand engagement of the claimants as part time for doing intermittent nature of
work and/or for cleaning the bank premises is duly admitted by the Management as per its pleadings and evidence
adduced on record. The workmen have been serving the Management Bank since long. As such, this Tribunal has no
hesitation to hold that there exists relationship of Employer-employee between the Management and the claimants herein.
9.
It is worthwhile to mention here that after verification of bank records, certificate Ex.P-19 (colly.) were issued by
the Management Bank, showing that workmen like Chaman Lal, Amar Singh, Prem Singh, Balbir Chand, Umesh
Kumar and Dharam Singh were found to be working for the jobs assigned to them vis-à-vis maintenance of voucher
register, dak register, voucher stitching cover leaves, current-cum-old records register, security forms and cheques issues
register, cheques returned register, cash receipt & withdrawal voucher, D/L and Term Loan balance confirmation and
documents register, account opening forms of deposit accounts, office order register besides ledger sheet, mini deposit
5428
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
collections . In the face of certificate Ex.P-19 (colly.) and descriptions of job done by the workmen as shown therein,
the stand of the Management that the workmen were not working throughout the day, is belied inasmuch type and nature
of work required for maintenance and keeping of aforesaid records/registers is of regular & perennial one and the same is
done especially during working hours of the bank. The version of WW1 Dharamchand that the workmen perform
duties right from 9.30 a.m. in the morning and to the job of clearning, sweeping and other allied jobs before opening the
bank and further that, the workmen also perform regular duties during the course of day, such as assisting the customers
to fill up voucher of withdrawal and deposit etc., has gone unrebutted. Thus, the claim of the Management Bank that
workmen are just casual/part-time workers engaged by it, is untenable, inasmuch as the nomenclature of the workmen
though used as part time workers but they had been working for full time for discharging their duties with regards to
description of jobs assigned to them.
10.
Now the crucial question arises for consideration is whether the action of management in not regularizing the
services of 108 messenger for the period of their continuous employment in the Bank is legal and justified.
11.
It is undisputed fact that pursuant to the directions dated 1/9/1987 of Hon’ble Supreme Court in All India
Gramin Bank Workers Organization &another Vs,. UOI and others (Writ Petition Nos7149-50./82 and 132/84),
the Central Govt. vide notification dated 26/11/1987 constituted a National Industrial Tribunal for adjudication of the
dispute relating to parity of pay, salary, allowances and other benefits with the employees of Nationalized Banks in
corresponding or comparable posts. The National Industrial Tribunal (in short “NIT”) after having gone through the
records as well as evidence adduced before it, gave its Award dated 30/4/1990 (Ex.A-5). Relating to dispute as to
whether the part-time Sweepers-cum-Messengers are justified in demanding salary on par with the permanent
Messengers, NIT in para 4.410 of the Award held as under :—
“In view of the authoritative pronouncements of the Supreme Court, it must be held that the part-time sweepers-
cum-messengers who were employed on daily wages or on half of the salary or on some other proportion of the
salary of a regular messenger, will be entitled to their various claims such as equal pay and all other attendant
benefits as are admissible to regularly appointed full time messengers in the respective RRBs. That there was/is
no sanctioned post of a regular messenger in a branch or the Head office is absolutely irrelevant and immaterial
in view of the proved facts that the so called part time messengers, whether on daily wages or on some other
basis, were made to work full time by their respective managements. The Managements can not extract full
time work and even beyond the working hours from the so called part time messengers by merely showing them
in the acquittance rolls as part time employees paid on either daily wages, or some other basis, or o some
proportionate basis. Their service shall be regularized with effect from the date of their continuous
engagement. If deemed necessary, it will be open to the Government or the RRBs as the case may be, to
sanction the required number of posts to accommodate the writ petitioners and all those belonging to
their class.”
12.
Perusal of the record shows that a demand notice dated 17-10-1994 (Ex.P-11) was served by the workmen Union to
the Chairman, Himachal Gramin Bank for removal of pay anomalies as well as regularization of messengers in terms of
the Award passed by NIT. As per document Ex.P11 talks were held between the Management and Workmen’s Union
on 21/11/1994 and after deliberations number of demands of the Officers and other employees like conveyance
allowance of Officers, reimbursement of actual hospitalization charges, promotion from scale I to Scale II, provision of
Wall Clock and calculators in the branches were accepted. However, as regards demand of regularization of the
messengers from the date of their engagement in the bank, it was decided that necessary information will be collected
from the concerned branches. What it emerges is that even after the Award of NIT dated 30.4.1990, the Management
had not taken effective steps even for four years or so, for regularization of the workmen herein viz. messengers working
in different branches under their control and supervision. The list of those workmen/ messengers is Ex.P-1 wherein date
of their respective appointment, date of regularization and place of posting has been elaborated and the said list shall
form part of this Award. No explanation has come forward from the side of the Management as to why it did not take
steps for regularization of the workmen in terms of the Award of the NIT dated 10/4/1990. In terms of the Award, the
services of the workmen are bound to be regularized with effect from the date of their continuous officiations with the
Management Thus, the action of the Management Bank in not regularizing the services of 108 messenger for the period
of their continuous employment in the Bank is held to be illegal and unjustified. The Management Bank is under legal
obligation to regularize the services of the workmen from the date of their continuous officiations with the Management.
13.
During the course of arguments, learned A/R for the Management strenuously argued that in fact the workmen
were regularized in 1987 by the Management as per direction of Govt. of India and NABARD, i.e. much before NIT
Award passed in 1990. He submitted that the Management Bank had started process of regularization of part time/daily
wage messengers under the provisions of letter dated 18/12/1984 and 15 persons were found eligible as on 31/12/1984 as
per criteria laid down by the Govt. of India and in the year 1987 when relaxation of age & qualification was given, 59
more workmen were regularized and in subsequent years 1980- to 1991, 45 more workmen were regularized and thus,
in fact 104 messengers were regularized till 1991, whereas 4 messengers who were appointed on compassionate grounds
after death of their spouse/dependent were regularized from 1993 to 1996. It will be suffice to say that the Management
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940
5429
has not adduced on record any such evidence that the workmen (108 Nos.) have since been regularized, even prior or
after passing of NIT Award on 10/4/1990 in terms of the Award itself. Even assuming for the sake of arguments that the
workmen herein have since been regularized by the Management Bank, the question arises for consideration is as to
whether they have been regularized with effect from the date of their continuous officiation. The Management has not
filed on record any document to show that the workmen have been regularized from the respective date of their
continuous officiation, in terms of the Award of NIT passed on 10/4/1990, which is per-se binding on the Management
Bank. In the circumstances, it is held that action of the Management Bank in not regularizing the services of the
workmen/messengers from the respective date of their officiation in the Management Bank is illegal and unjustified,
inasmuch as in terms of the NIT Award, the services of the workmen are required to be regularized with effect from the
date of their continuous officiation.
14.
Now the residual question arises for consideration is as to what relief the workmen are entitled to. It is worthwhile
to mention here that the relief granted by the NIT Award are unequivocally contained in para 4.425 and 4.427 which for
ready reference are reproduced hereunder :—
“4.425 : What flows from my findings is that the Officers and other employees of RRBs will be entitled to claim
parity with the Officers and other employees of the Sponsor Banks in the matter of pay scales, allowances and
other benefits. What stems from this finding is the date from which effect should be given to the Award. I have
given my anxious consideration as to the date from which the Award should be given effect. The writ petitions
No.7149-50/82 and 132/84 were not filed at one and the same time. They were filed on different dates.
Petitioners in W.P. Nos.7149-50/82 claimed reliefs from the date of establishment of RRBs. Petitioners in W.P.
No.132/84 did not specify any date but in their claim statement filed before me, they have asked for effect being
given from the date of writ petition i.e. 16-9-1984. I think it would be proper, just and reasonable if I direct that
the Award shall be given effect from 1st day of September, 1987 the date on which the Supreme Court passed
the order directing the Central Government to constitute the Tribunal.
4.427. .Having regard to the above, in order to eliminate the anomalies and bring about uniformity in the pay
scales in all the RRBs at least to the extent of each State, I find that they will be entitled to all the allowances,
benefits which the State Government servants of comparable level and status are entitled to. They will,
therefore, be only entitled to claim the difference in allowances and other benefits, so as to bring about
uniformity with the State Government employees in all matters of pay scales, allowances, benefits etc., till
31st day of August, 1987 .
The aforesaid two paragraphs cover the relief relating to pay parity for the entire period with effect from the date of
regularization as envisaged under para 4.410. Both these paragraphs if read together makes it amply clear that the pay
parity of the workmen is to be regularized in terms of para 4.410 with effect from the date of their continuous officiation
with corresponding pay and emoluments paid to the such other employees of the Management Bank with effect from
1st day of September, 1987 and prior to that, the pay parity with the employees of RRBs is to be maintained with the
allowances, benefits which the State Govt. of comparable level and status are entitled to. To this view, I am fortified by
the decision of Hon’ble High Court of Rajasthan (at Jodhpur) in the case of Harudhar Kshetriya Gram Bank Vs. Mahavir
Singh and another (Civil Special Appeal (W) No. 70./2002 – decided on 21/4/2003.
15.
Hon’ble the Apex Court in the case of State of Punjab and others Vs. Jagjit Singh and others, 2017Lab.L.C. 427
while upholding the principle of “equal pay for equal work” even for temporary employees observed as under :—
“The principle of “equal pay for equal work” can be extended to temporary employees (differently described as
work-charged, daily wage, casual, adhoc, contractual and the like). It is fallacious to determine artificial
parameters to deny fruits of labour. An employee engaged for the same work, can not be paid less than another,
who performs the same duties and responsibilities. Certainly not, in a welfare State. Such an action besides
being demeaning, strikes at the very foundation of human dignity. Any one, who is compelled to work at a
lesser wage, does not do so voluntarily. He does so, to provide food and shelter to his family, at the cost of his
self respect and dignity, at the cost of his self worth, and at the cost of his integrity. For he knows, that his
dependents would suffer immensely, if he does not accept the lesser wage. Any act, of paying less wages, as
compared to others similarly situate, constitutes an act of exploitative enslavement, emerging out of a
domineering position. Undoubtedly, the action is oppressive, suppressive and coercive, as it compels
involuntary subjugation.”
16.
It is pertinent to mention here that the reference to National Industrial Tribunal had been made in regard to all the
employees of Gramin Bank throughout the country and therefore, all the Banks including the Management-Bank
were./are bound to implement the award in regard to their respective employees. In these circumstances, this Tribunal is
of the considered view that the workmen are also entitled to the relief which the NIT has awarded to the category of
employees in para 4.410 re-produced above. However, in terms of para 4.428, the NIT award has been given effect to
from the 1st day of September, 1987. As per list Ex.P-1, all the workmen/claimants herein joined service with the
Management Bank after 1/9/1987, to be more precise during the period between 19-11-87 to 12/6/1996. Therefore, the
5430
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Management Bank is directed to implement the Award and give all the necessary & consequential reliefs to the
claimants/workmen (including the legal heirs of deceased workmen in case of demise of any of the workmen, during the
proceedings) with effect from the date they joined service. The award is passed accordingly.
Date : 23.07.2018
AVTAR CHAND DOGRA, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 30 vxLr] 2018
dk-vk- 1343-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj if'pe jsyos
ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k
,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 144@2013) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 30-08-2018 dks çkIr
gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&41011@29@2013&vkbZvkj (ch&I)º
ch- ,l- fc"V] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 30th August, 2018
S.O. 1343.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 144/2013) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Western
Railway and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 30.08.2018.
[No. L-41011/29/2013-IR (B-I)]
B. S. BISHT, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,
Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,
Ahmedabad,
Dated 09th August, 2018
Reference: (CGITA) No. 144/2013
The Sr. Divisional Engineer (Co-ordination),
Western Railway, Asarwa,
Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
…First Party
V/s
The Divisional Secretary,
Paschim Railway Karmachari Parishad,
28-B, Narayan Park,
Behind Chandkheda Railway Station,
Sabarmati,
Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 382470
…Second Party
For the First Party
:
Shri M.M. Solanki
For the Second Party
:
Shri R.S. Sisodiya (Union Representative)
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-41011/29/2013–
IR(B-I) dated 24.07.2013 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect
of the matter specified in the Schedule:
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940
5431
SCHEDULE
“Whether the demand of the Vice President, Paschim Railway Karmachari Parishad, Ahmedabad against the
Sr. Divisional Engineer (Co-ordination), Western Railway, Ahmedabad:
i.
To take back order of freeze of one year increment and to take wage order of downgrade of one stage for
two months against Shri Badiwel Kuppan, Jamadar;
ii.
To take back the punishment imposed against Shri Ram Naresh, Gangman;
iii.
To take posted Shri Sanjay Thakur and Shri Rajesh Kushwaha as Khalasi;
Are legal, fair and justified? If so, then to what relief the above workmen are entitled to?”
1.
The reference dates back to 24.07.2013 and received on 06.08.2013 from Ministry of Labour and Employment,
New Delhi for adjudication.
2.
Both the parties issued notice Ex. 2 to appear on 27.12.2013. In response to the notice, the second party union
submitted the statement of claim Ex. 4 on 27.12.2013. Shri Mangal Solanki submitted his vakalatpatra Ex. 3 on behalf of
the first party.
3.
The case was fixed for filing of written statement for the first party but today on 09.08.2018, Shri R.S. Sisodiya,
The Divisional Secretary, Paschim Railway Karmachari Parishad, 28-B, Narayan Park, Behind Chandkheda Railway
Station, Sabarmati, Ahmedabad, requested the Tribunal to withdraw the case.
4.
Thus the reference is disposed of as withdrawn.
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 30 vxLr] 2018
dk-vk- 1344-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj if'peh
jsyos ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 05@2017) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 30-08-2018
dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&41011@17@2016&vkbZvkj (ch&I)º
ch- ,l- fc"V] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 30th August, 2018
S.O. 1344.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 05/2017) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Western Railway and
their workmen, received by the Central Government on 30.08.2018.
[No. L-41011/17/2016-IR (B-I)]
B. S. BISHT, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,
Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,
Ahmedabad,
Dated 10th August, 2018
Reference: (CGITA) No. 05/2017
1.
The Divisional Railway Manager,
Western Railway, Asarwa, Near Chamunda Bridge,
Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
5432
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2.
The President,
RMCC, Pratapnagar,
Baroda (Gujarat)
…First Parties
V/s
The President,
Akhil Bhartiya Karmachari Mahasangh,
28-B, Narayan Park,
Behind Chandkheda Railway Station,
Sabarmati,
Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 382470
…Second Party
For the First Party
:
Shri M.M. Makhija
For the Second Party
:
Shri R.S. Sisodiya (Union Representative)
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-41011/17/2016–IR(B-I)
dated 08.02.2017 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Central Government Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad
(Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the demand of the President, Akhil Bhartiya Karmachari Mahasangh, Ahmedabad against the
President, RMCC, Baroda to disburse the amount without any deduction to Shri Jitendra Labhshankar,
Benjamin and Manharbhai is legal, fair and justified? If so, then what relief the workmen, Shri Jitendra
Labhshankar, Benjamin and Manharbhai are entitled to?”
1.
The reference dates back to 08.02.2017 and received on 13.02.2017 from Ministry of Labour and Employment,
New Delhi for adjudication.
2.
All the parties issued notice Ex. 2 on 03.01.2018 to appear on 05.03.2018. In response to the notice, Shri M. M.
Makhija, submitted his vakalatpatra Ex. 5 on behalf of the first party no. 1.
3.
The case was fixed for filing of statement of claim for the second party but today on 10.08.2018, Shri R.S.
Sisodiya, The President, Akhil Bhartiya Karmachari Mahasangh, 28-B, Narayan Park, Behind Chandkheda
Railway Station, Sabarmati, Ahmedabad, requested the Tribunal to withdraw the case.
4.
Thus the reference is disposed of as withdrawn.
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 30 vxLr] 2018
dk-vk-1345-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj if'peh jsyos
ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k
,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 09@2017) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 30-08-2018 dks çkIr
gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&41011@13@2016&vkbZvkj (ch&I)º
ch- ,l- fc"V] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 30th August, 2018
S.O. 1345.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 09/2017) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Western Railway and
their workmen, received by the Central Government on 30.08.2018.
[No. L-41011/13/2016-IR (B-I)]
B. S. BISHT, Section Officer
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940
5433
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,
Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,
Ahmedabad,
Dated 10th August, 2018
Reference: (CGITA) No. 09/2017
The Divisional Railway Manager,
Western Railway,
Pratapnagar,
Baroda (Gujarat) - 390004
…First Party
V/s
The Dy. General Secretary,
Paschim Railway Karmachari Parishad,
28-B, Narayan Park,
Behind Chandkheda Railway Station,
Sabarmati,
Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 382470
…Second Party
For the First Party
:
Shri M.M. Makhija
For the Second Party
:
Shri R.S. Sisodiya (Union Representative)
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-41011/13/2016–
IR(B-I) dated 08.02.2017 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Central Government Industrial Tribunal,
Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the demand of the Dy. General Secretary, Paschim Railway Karmachari Parishad, Ahmedabad against
the Divisional Railway Manager, Western Railway, Baroda to give/allow family pension to Shri Budha Mohan,
Ex-Gangman is legal, fair and justified? If so, then what relief Shri Budha Mohan, Ex-Gangman is entitled to?”
1.
The reference dates back to 08.02.2017 and received on 08.03.2017 from Ministry of Labour and Employment,
New Delhi for adjudication.
2.
All the parties issued notice Ex. 2 on 03.01.2018 to appear on 05.03.2018. In response to the notice, Shri M. M.
Makhija, submitted his vakalatpatra Ex. 5 on behalf of the first party.
3.
The case was fixed for filing of statement of claim for the second party but today on 10.08.2018, Shri R.S.
Sisodiya, The Dy. General Secretary, Paschim Railway Karmachari Parishad, 28-B, Narayan Park, Behind Chandkheda
Railway Station, Sabarmati, Ahmedabad, requested the Tribunal to withdraw the case on the ground that the Case No.
08/2013 having the same matter is pending before this Tribunal.
4.
Thus the reference is disposed of as withdrawn.
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 30 vxLr] 2018
dk-vk- 1346-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj Hkkjrh; LVsV
cSad ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 454@2004) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 30-08-2018
dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&12012@314@2001&vkbZvkj (ch&I)º
ch- ,l- fc"V] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
5434
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
New Delhi, the 30th August, 2018
S.O. 1346.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 454/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of
India and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 30.08.2018.
[No. L-12012/314/2001-IR (B-I)]
B. S. BISHT, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,
Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,
Ahmedabad,
Dated 07th August, 2018
Reference: (CGITA) No. 454/2004
1.
The Chief General Manager,
State Bank of India,
Local Head Office, Bhadra,
Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380001
2.
The Dy. General Manager,
State Bank of India,
Zonal Office, Ambawadi,
Ahmedabad (Gujarat) - 380001
…First Parties
V/s
The Secretary,
Gujarat Rajya Ardgsarjaru Audhyogik Karmachar Sangh,
4, Deelex Apartments, 1st Floor, Vastrapur,
Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380007
…Second Party
For the First Party
:
Shri B.K. Oza
For the Second Party
:
Shri R.C. Pathak
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-12012/314/2001–
IR(B-I) dated 27.12.2001 referred the disute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect
of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of State Bank of India in not regularising the services of Shri
Sureshbhai B. Vaghela is justified? If not, what relief the concerned workman is entitled?”
1.
The reference dates back to 27.12.2001 and received on 04.01.2002 from Ministry of Labour and Employment,
New Delhi for adjudication.
2.
The second party submitted the statement of claim Ex. 5 on 09.09.2003 and the first party submitted the written
statement Ex. 6 on 24.12.2003. Thereafter, the second party union moved an application Ex. 10 on 27.09.2017 for
production of documents. The first party also filed the reply Ex. 11 with respect to the application for production of
documents Ex. 10 filed by the second party.
3.
It is noteworthy that this reference was moved for regularising the services of the second party workman while the
second party workman has already been dismissed from service. Concerning the dismissal, he raised the dispute before
the Assistant Labour Commissioner, Ahmedabad regarding the dismissal which was not referred by the Government of
India to this Tribunal. Thus a dismissed employee cannot claim his regularisation unless he adopts a step to get the
dismissal set aside. Same has not been done. Thus this reference has become in-fructuous.
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940
5435
4.
Today on 07.08.2018, the advocate for the second party workman Shri R.C. Pathak requested for withdrawal of the
reference.
5.
Thus the reference is disposed of as withdrawn.
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 30 vxLr] 2018
dk-vk- 1347-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj if'peh
jsyos ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 31@2017) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 30-08-2018
dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&41012@13@2016&vkbZvkj (ch&I)º
ch- ,l- fc"V] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 30th August, 2018
S.O. 1347.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 31/2017) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Western Railway and
their workmen, received by the Central Government on 30.08.2018.
[No. L-41012/13/2016-IR (B-I)]
B. S. BISHT, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,
Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,
Ahmedabad,
Dated 07th August, 2018
Reference: (CGITA) No. 31/2017
1.
The Sr. Divisional Railway Manager,
Western Railway,
Divisional Office, Asarwa, Chamunda Bridge,
Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
2.
The Manager,
Bank of India, Ramnagar, Sabarmati,
Ahmedabad (Gujarat) - 380005
…First Party
V/s
The President,
Akhil Gujarat Karmachari Mahasangh,
28/B, Narayan Park, Behind Chandkheda Railway Station,
Sabarmati,
Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 382470
…Second Party
For the First Party
:
None
For the Second Party
:
Shri R.S. Sisodiya (Union Representative)
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-41012/13/2016–
IR(B-I) dated 26.04.2017 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Central Government Industrial Tribunal,
Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
5436
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of Sr. Divisional Finance Manager, Western Railway, Ahmedabad to
refix the family pension as per old PPO to Smt. Reshma W/o Late Anil Dutt Mishra and illegal recovery of
arrears from her family pension is legal, fair and justified? If so, then what relief Smt. Reshma is entitled to?”
1.
The reference dates back to 26.04.2017 and received on 04.05.2017 from Ministry of Labour and Employment,
New Delhi for adjudication.
2.
All the parties issued notice Ex. 2 to appear on 06.03.2018 but none responded from any of the parties.
3.
Shri R.S. Sisodiya, the President, Akhil Gujarat Karmachari Mahasangh,28/B, Narayan Park, Behind Chandkheda
Railway Station, Sabarmati, Ahmedabad, today on 07.08.2018 requested the Tribunal to withdraw the case.
4.
Thus the reference is disposed of as withdrawn.
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 30 vxLr] 2018
dk-vk- 1348-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj Hkkjrh; LVsV
cSad ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 327@99) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 30-08-2018 dks
çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&12012@283@99&vkbZvkj (ch&I)º
ch- ,l- fc"V] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 30th August, 2018
S.O. 1348.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 327/99) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of India and
their workmen, received by the Central Government on 30.08.2018.
[No. L-12012/283/99-IR (B-I)]
B. S. BISHT, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/327/99
Shri Suresh,
S/o Chottelal Yadav,
18/3, Moti Tabela,
Indore (MP)
…Workman
Versus
Dy.General Manager,
State Bank of India,
Local Head Office,
Hamidia Road,
Bhopal (MP)
…Management
ORDER
Passed on this 24th day of April 2018
1.
As per letter dated 15-11-99 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is received.
The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section-10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.L-12012/283/99/IR(B-I).
The dispute under reference relates to:
“Whether the action of the management of State Bank of India, Indore, Indore in not regularizing and terminating
the services of Shri Suresh S/o Shri Chhotelal Yadav, Ex-Peon w.e.f. 30-10-97 is legal and justified. If not, to what
relief the workman is entitled to?”
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940
5437
2.
On perusal of record, it is seen that Ist party is not taking any steps from the year 2005 after filing of claim
statement. 2nd party management has already filed its Written Statement. The case is found lingering awaiting appearance
of the workman to file documents if any for hearing and on settlement of issues. The case cannot be allowed to linger for
an indefinite period. Hence it is just and proper to return the reference without any answer as Ist party workman fails to
present the dispute and it is difficult on part of the Tribunal to adjudicate the dispute without evidence of the Ist party.
Accordingly the dispute is disposed off.
3.
Let the copies of the order be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment as per rules.
B. C. RATH, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 30 vxLr] 2018
dk-vk- 1349-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj Hkkjrh; LVsV
cSad ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 132@2004) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 30-08-2018
dks çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&12012@44@98&vkbZvkj (ch&I)º
ch- ,l- fc"V] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 30th August, 2018
S.O. 1349.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 132/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of
India and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 30.08.2018.
[No. L-12012/44/98-IR (B-I)]
B. S. BISHT, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,
Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,
Ahmedabad,
Dated 13th August, 2018
Reference: (CGITA) No. 132/2004
The Manager,
State Bank of India,
Main Branch, Bhadra,
Ahmedabad (Gujarat) - 380001
…First Party
V/s
Mr. P.C. Rajput,
P. No. 224/12, Pyarchand Punjabi Laxmishankar Bhavan,
Khokhra Road, Opp. Old Municipal Quarters,
Ahmedabad (Gujarat) - 380001
…Second Party
For the First Party
:
Shri D.C. Gandhi Associates
For the Second Party
:
Shri B.B. Thesia
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-12012/44/98–
IR(B-I) dated 28.08.1998 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect
of the matter specified in the Schedule:
5438
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of State Bank of India in terminating the services of Shri Pyarchand C.
Rajput w.e.f. 31.01.1997 and not considering for regular employment is justified? If not, what relief the
concerned workman is entitled to?”
1.
The reference dates back to 28.08.1998 and received on 30.09.1999 from Ministry of Labour and Employment,
New Delhi for adjudication and passing the award.
2.
After issuing notice to the parties, the second party submitted the statement of claim Ex. 8 on 09.10.1998 and the
first party submitted the written statement Ex. 9 on 23.09.1999. Since then the second party has been absent and has not
been leading evidence despite giving dozens of opportunities.
3.
Today on 13.08.2018, the advocate for the second party, Shri B.B. Thesia states that the second party workman/his
client has not been in his contact since long.
4.
Thus it appears that the second party workman is not willing to prosecute the case.
5.
Therefore, the reference is disposed of in the absence of the evidence of the second party workman with the
observation as under: “the action of the management of State Bank of India in terminating the services of Shri Pyarchand
C. Rajput w.e.f. 31.01.1997 and not considering for regular employment is justified.”
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 31 vxLr] 2018
dk-vk- 1350.—deZpkjh jkT; chek vf/kfu;e 1948 ¼1948 dk 34½ dh /kkjk&1 dh mi /kkjk ¼3½ }kjk iznRr 'kfDr;ksa
dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] dsUnzh; ljdkj ,rn~}kjk 1 flrEcj] 2018 dks ml rkjh[k ds :i esa fu;r djrh gS] ftldks mDr
vf/kfu;e ds v/;k;&4 ¼44 o 45 /kkjk ds flok; tks igys ls izo`Rr gks pqdh gS½ v/;k;&5 vkSj 6 [/kkjk&76 dh mi /kkjk&¼1½
vkSj /kkjk&77] 78]79 vkSj 81 ds flok; tks igys gh izo`Rr dh tk pqdh gS] ds mica/k rfeyukMq jkT; ds fuEufyf[kr {ks=ksa
¼igys ls vf/klwfpr {ks=ksa ds vykok½ esa izo`Rr gksaxs] vFkkZr~ %&
Øe la-
ftyksa dk uke
1
fo#nquxj
2
fr#ok#j
[la- ,l&38013@04@2018&,l-,l-I]
larks"k dqekj flag] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 31st August, 2018
S.O. 1350.—In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-Section (3) of Section 1 of the Employees State
Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948), the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st September, 2018 as the date on
which the provisions of Chapter IV (except Section 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force) and Chapter-
V and VI [except Sub-Section (1) of Section 76 and Section 77,78,79 and 81 which have already been brought into force]
of the said Act shall come into force in the following Districts in the State of Tamil Nadu, in whole, in addition to the
already implemented areas in the district namely:-
Sl. No.
NAME OF THE DISTRICT
1
VIRUDHUNAGAR
2
THIRUVARUR
[No. S-38013/04/2018-S.S.I]
S. K. SINGH, Under Secy.
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940
5439
ubZ fnYyh] 31 vxLr] 2018
dk-vk-1351-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vks ,u th lh
fyfeVsM ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 161@2004) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 27-08-2018 dks
çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&30012@60@1998&vkbZvkj (lh&I)º
,e- ds- flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 31st August, 2018
S.O. 1351.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad
(Ref. No. 161/2004) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the
management of ONGC Ltd., and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 27.08.2018.
[No. L-30012/60/1998-IR (C-I)]
M. K. SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,
Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,
Ahmedabad,
Dated 06th August, 2018
Reference: (CGITA) No. 161/2004
1.
The Group General Manager (P),
ONGC Ltd., Avani Bhavan,
Chandkheda,
Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380005
2.
Shri Y.K. Patil,
Hotel Sugand,
Nr. Jognima Temple, Ramnagar, Sabarmati,
Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
…First Party
V/s
The General Secretary,
Gujarat Petroleum Employees Union,
434/46, Gandhi Vas, Gujarat Stadium Road,
Sabarmati,
Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380005
…Second Party
For the First Party
:
Shri K.V. Gadhia
For the Second Party
:
Kum. Santoshben
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-30012/60/98–
IR(C-I) dated 10.02.1999 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect
of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the canteen situated in the premises of Sabarmati Establishment of ONGC was statutory canteen and
the persons detailed in the list annexed with the reference, were working therein?”
and
5440
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
“Whether the demand of Gujarat Petroleum Employees Union that the persons working in the said canteen
ought to be treated as direct employees of ONGC is legal, just and proper? If so, then what relief, if any, the
employees concerned are entitled?”
1.
The reference dates back to 10.02.1999 and received on 18.02.1999 from Ministry of Labour and Employment,
New Delhi for adjudication.
2.
It is noteworthy that the present Reference (CGITA) No. 161/2004 was earlier registered as Reference (ITC) No.
47/1999 while pending the case in the Industrial Tribunal (Central), Ahmedabad. Later it was transferred to this Tribunal
where new number Reference (CGITA) No. 161/2004 was allotted.
3.
In response the notices issued to the parties, J.S. Parasar, General Secretary, Gujarat Petroleum Employees Union,
434/46, Gandhi Vas, Gujarat Stadium Road, Sabarmati, Ahmedabad, submitted the statement of claim Ex. 4 on
23.07.1999 alleging that the similar dispute was also raised in respect to the same canteen in a reference registered at
Reference (ITC) No. 10/1998 by the workmen. The present reference has been moved in respect of 9 employees detailed
as under:
S. No.
Name of Workman
Post Held
Date
of
appointment
Wages at the time of
termination
1
Sudhirbhai Govindrao Patel
Manager
cum
Supervisor
11.12.1989
Rs.2000/- per month
2
Sahilesh K. Parmar
Assistant Cook
11.12.1989
Rs.750/- per month
3
Ramesh B. Thakore
Service Boy
11.12.1989
Rs.750/- per month
4
Rajuji Meshram
Store Keeper
April, 1991
Rs.550/- per month
5
Arvind A. Vaghela
Service Boy
January, 1992
Rs.385/- per month
6
Gunvant GurudasMorshikhar
Service Boy
January, 1992
Rs.550/- per month
7
Mahesh M. Parmar
Utensil Cleaner
September, 1995
Rs.500/- per month
8
Manilal Revabhai Parmar
Assistant Cook
January, 1995
Rs.385/- per month
9
Mathurdas B. Parmar
Service Boy
January, 1991
Rs.385/- per month
Thus it appears that the earlier Reference (ITC) No. 10/1998 relates to 16 employees and the present reference
relates to aforesaid 9 employees. These employees alleged to have been engaged in a canteen running at Sabarmati
Premises of ONGC Ltd. where more than 1000 employees of ONGC were working and this canteen was running and
created for the employees exclusively working in the ONGC and it was statutory canteen under the Mines Act.
4.
It is further alleged that the said canteen was earlier run by ONGC Consumer Co-operative Society and since the
said society went into liquidation, therefore, the said canteen was handed over to a contractor named M/s. Y.K. Patil. It is
further alleged that the workmen who raised the dispute vide Reference (ITC) No. 10/1998 moved the High Court of
Gujarat vide SCA No. 127/1996. It is noteworthy that the workmen who moved the Gujarat High Court were inclusive of
the workmen in another Reference (ITC) No. 47/1999 (in present Reference (CGITA) No. 161/2004). The High Court in
the aforesaid SCA No. 127/1996 directed the Central Labour Commissioner to investigate and find out the names of the
workmen who had been working in the said canteen for more than 3 years. The Labour Enforcement Officer (Central)
investigated and submitted a report before the High Court of Gujarat, wherein the names of the workmen detailed in the
Reference (ITC) No. 47/1999 (present reference), were not included in the report but they were present at the time of
enquiry. It is further alleged that the services of all the employees mentioned in the present reference were terminated on
30.05.1996 without paying the retrenchment compensation or serving the notice by the ONGC or the contractor as the
case may be. It has been further alleged that the said canteen was part and parcel of the efficient working of the
employees of ONGC, the first party and the contract was for name sake. It has been further alleged that the workmen
were working under the direct control and supervision of the first party ONGC and they have been working for a long
time, therefore, the ONGC constituted a committee to supervise the work of the canteens for maintaining the quality of
the food items prepared in the canteen. The ONGC has also provided the facility of premises, furniture, water cooler and
refrigerator - de-freezer etc. besides cooking utensils, crockeries and all the instruments of cooking facilities for the
smooth running of the canteen. It has been also alleged that the canteen facility was obligatory even if the ONGC has not
explicitly undertaking to provide the canteen facility to its employees. Thus the second party union has prayed for
reinstatement of all the workmen concerning this reference with back wages with a continuity of service and other
benefits admissible to the regular employees of ONGC.
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940
5441
5.
The first party The Group General Manager (P),ONGC Ltd., Avani Bhavan, Chandkheda, Ahmedabad, hereinafter
referred to as “ONGC” submitted the written statement Ex. 11 denying all the averments made in the statement of claim
submitted that the concerned workmen under the reference were not the workmen as defined under Section 2 (s) of the
Industrial Disputes Act. There was no master servant relationship between the ONGC and the alleged workmen under
this reference. There does not exist any industrial dispute as defined under Section 2 (k) of the Industrial Disputes Act.
The second party union was not having any locus-standii to represent the alleged workmen under the reference as per the
provisions of Section 6 (e) of the Trade Union Act as the second party union by virtue of its constitution, was not
authorised to represent persons employed in Hotels, Restaurants, Industries etc. It has also been submitted that these
persons were not engaged by the ONGC and at present, have not been working in the canteen. Therefore, they cannot be
said to be entitled for benefits of regular employees of ONGC. It has been further submitted that under the Factories Act
as well as under the Mines Act, the ONGC is not under obligation to maintain or run the canteen. The rule 72 of the
Mines (Central) Rules provides that the Chief Inspector of Mines is only authorised and also notified for establishment of
a canteen in any establishment related to the Mines. Therefore, unless such notification is not issued by the Chief
Inspector of Mines, it cannot be said or construed that ONGC was in the obligation to establish and run the canteen.
Therefore, the reference has no force and the concerned persons are not entitled for any relief.
6.
The second party union moved an application Ex. 14 to implead Shri Y.K. Patil, contractor of the canteen as first
party No. 2. The said application after hearing was allowed by the then Presiding Officer and Shri Y.K. Patil was
impleaded as first party No. 2. Thereafter, the second party union as directed by the Tribunal amended the statement of
claim accordingly. The copy of the statement of claim was also sent to the aforesaid contractor but despite receiving the
copy of statement of claim by registered post, the acknowledgement of post Ex. 21 is on record, the contractor/first party
No. 2 did not submit the written statement.
7.
The second party union moved an application Ex. 12 for production of documents detailed in the application.
Instead of pressing the said application, the second party union lead the oral evidence by way of submitting affidavits Ex.
22 and 25 of Shaileshkaushalbhai K. Parmar and Arvindkumar A. Vaghela respectively. Later, the union did not press the
aforesaid application Ex. 12.
8.
On the basis of the pleadings, the following issues arise:
I.
Whether the canteen situated in the premises of Sabarmati Establishment of ONGC was statutory canteen and
the persons detailed in the list annexed with the reference, were working therein?
II.
Whether the demand of Gujarat Petroleum Employees Union that the persons working in the said canteen
ought to be treated as direct employees of ONGC is legal, just and proper?
III.
To what relief, if any, the employees concerned are entitled?
9.
Issue Nos. I, II and III: All the issues are interrelated, therefore, are to be decided together. The burden of proof of
these issues was lying on the second party union. The witnesses examined Shaileshkaushalbhai K. Parmar and
Arvindkumar A. Vaghela in their affidavits Ex. 22 and 25 have reiterated the averments made in the statement of claim
reiterating that they were helping the Chef/Cook in the canteen and their last monthly wages were Rs.725/- per month.
They were terminated on 30.05.1996 without serving notice or paying notice pay or compensation. They tried to search
alternative job after termination but did not succeed. In their cross-examination, they have stated that they do not know
the contractor Y.K. Patil which was impleaded as party. They have also admitted that the ONGC did not give them any
appointment letter. They have also admitted that the contract of the contractor Y.K. Patil came to end on 30.05.1996 but
denied in their cross-examination that Y.K. Patil was having supervision control of the canteen and used to pay wages to
them. One of the witnesses Shaileshkaushalbhai K. Parmar admitted that the expenditures of his family have been
managed by him and his brother after termination. The witness Arvindkumar A. Vaghela in his cross-examination
admitted that Y.K. Patil was running the canteen. He used to pay the wages to all the canteen employees but he does not
know when the contract of the canteen was terminated.
10.
It is noteworthy that the list annexed with the reference has the details of 9 workmen but only 2 aforesaid witnesses
were examined. The second party union has also submitted a pursis that the persons at Serial Nos. 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8 and 9
have not been approaching the union since long and their addresses are not available with the union, therefore, they are
not pressing the reference on behalf of the aforesaid persons except Shaileshkaushalbhai K. Parmar and Arvindkumar A.
Vaghela.
11.
What can be inferred from the terms of the reference is that this Tribunal first has to decide the issue that whether
the Sabarmati Canteen was a statutory canteen under the Mines Act. The second party union in its statement of claim has
stated that the canteen was a statutory canteen under the Mines Act, situated and running in the premises belonging to
ONGC with the help and facility of its furniture, fixtures, utensils, kerosene burners, water containers, crockeries,
cutleries, refrigerators, water coolers and de-freezers etc. but the second party union has not submitted any oral and
documentary evidence to substantiate the fact that the canteen in question was a statutory canteen in the Mines Act. The
second party union has also not submitted the notification or instruction issued by any competent authority directing the
5442
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ONGC to run a canteen so may that it may be called as statutory canteen. It is also noteworthy that the ONGC was
governed by Mines Act and was not governed by the Factories Act. ONGC in his written statement and argument has
denied that the canteen in question was a statutory canteen and has also stated that the Chief Inspector of Mines never
issued instructions or notification to maintain the canteen in question for its employees. The Central Government under
Section 58 of the Mines Act has powers to frame rules. The rule 64 of the Mines Rules 1995 provides for issuing
notification by Chief Inspector of Mines directing the concerned establishment to maintain canteen for its employees. In
the present case, there is no such evidence, therefore, the Issue No. I is decided in the negative with a finding that the
canteen in question was not a statutory canteen.
12.
Since the issue No. I is answered in negative against the second party union, therefore, the tribunal did not go into
the second and third issues as the same come into play only if the first issue is answered in affirmative.
13.
However as stated above, out of 9 persons, only 2 persons entered into witness box and reference qua 7 persons,
vide Ex. 27, the union has not led any evidence as they are not in contact of the union since long and not interested to
proceed the matter. Regarding remaining 2 persons who have deposed before the tribunal, they are not entitled to get any
relief against the first party ONGC as they have admitted in their cross-examination that they were paid the wages by the
contractor Y.K. Patil and the contract of contractor Y.K. Patil ended w.e.f. 31.05.1996. Secondly, they have admitted in
their cross-examination that the ONGC has not given them any appointment letter; therefore, employer-employee
relationship does not exist between the ONGC and the remaining 2 persons. Also the ONGC has not appointed them and
the second party union failed to prove that the services of remaining 2 workmen have been terminated by the ONGC.
From the record, it is established that more than 20 years have passed from the date of alleged termination of the
workmen. Therefore, they are not entitled to get any relief against the ONGC including reinstatement and back wages.
From the pleadings, it is transpired that in SCA No. 127/1998 filed by the second party union, the Hon’ble High Court
has directed the Central Labour Commissioner to investigate into the matter. Accordingly, Labour Enforcement Officer
(Central) has conducted the enquiry and filed the report before the Hon’ble High Court wherein the names of the
concerned employees were not mentioned. The same also proves that they are not deployed by the ONGC nor they were
in job at the time of the visit of Labour Enforcement Officer (Central). Therefore, the concerned 2 workmen are not
entitled to be reinstatement. Thus as stated above, the concerned 2 workmen failed to prove that the Sabarmati canteen is
a statutory canteen and they were deployed by ONGC and paid salary by the ONGC. They are not entitled to get relief of
reinstatement and to be treated as direct employees of the ONGC. Moreover as per the settled law, when the concerned
workmen are not in job, they are not entitled to get status of direct employee of ONGC. The first party has relied upon
the judgements of Hon’ble Supreme Court reported in 2000 (2) CLR 241 and 2007 (3) CLR 690, wherein the apex court
has held that the workers working in the canteen which is not a statutory canteen, are not employees of the Principal
Employer. Moreover, the first party has also relied upon the judgement of Hon’ble Apex Court reported in 2014 (3) CLR
751, wherein the apex court has held that although there exists some degree of control and supervision on workers of
statutory canteen, the said workers are not entitled for regularisation. Thus considering the facts of the present case and
the ration laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, I come to the conclusion that the remaining 2 workmen are not
entitled to get the status of direct employees of ONGC.
14.
Thus the reference is finally disposed of as dismissed and no relief is granted.
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 31 vxLr] 2018
dk-vk- 1352-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ
chlhlh,y ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky; la- 2] /uckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 02@2012) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 27-08-2018 dks
çkIr gqvk FkkA
¹la- ,y&20012@55@2011&vkbZvkj (lh,e&I)º
,e- ds- flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh
New Delhi, the 31st August, 2018
S.O. 1352.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No, 2,
Dhanbad (Ref. No. 02 of 2012) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to
the management of M/s. BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 27.08.2018.
[No. L-20012/55/2011-IR (CM-I)]
M. K. SINGH, Section Officer
¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940
5443
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO.2), AT DHANBAD
PRESENT : Shri P.K.Mishra, Presiding Officer
In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1) (d) of the I.D.Act., 1947
REFERENCE NO 02 OF 2012
PARTIES
:
The Vice President,
Rastriya Colliery Mazdoor Congress At: Vinod Nagar,
Chiragora, Distt: Dhanbad
Dhanbad. (Jharkhand).
Vs.
The General Manager,
E, J. Area of M/s. BCCL
PO: Bhowra, Distt: Dhanbad (Jharkhand)
Order No. -20012/55/2011-IR(CM-I) dt. 20.12.2011
APPEARANCES
:
On behalf of the workman/Union
:
Mr.S.C.Gaur, Ld. Union Rep.
On behalf of the Management
:
Mr.D.K.Verma, Ld. Advocate
State : Jharkhand
Industry : Coal
Dhanbad, the 9th Aug., 2018
AWARD
The Government of India, Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Sec.10(1)(d) of
the I.D. Act.,1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No.
20012/55/2011-IR(CM-I) dt. 20.12.2011.
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the Management of Bhowra (S) Colliery of M/s. BCCL in dismissing Sh.Sakindra
Bhuia from the services of the Company vide order dated 28/31.07.2006 is justified? To what relief the
workman concerned is entitled to?”
2.
The instant case put up on date. Junior to Mr. D.K.Verma, Ld. Counsel for the Management appeared .So long the
Union concerned, its Representative Mr. S C. Gaur too, made his appearance before the Court moving with a petition
dt.07.06.2018 of the workman concerned citing his unwillingness to contest the case on merit. More so, it prima facie
reflects workman unwillingness to go in for final adjudication. These sumps up the stand, the Tribunal has been looking
on such cases over years. The status of case was fixed around filing documents resting an onus on the part of the O, P.
/Management since long back from 02.4.2014 .Ironically , there have been subsequently sufficient adjournments availed
of by both of the parties on different pretexts with no signs of action seems visible. The case deals with dismissal of the
workman under the Management of Bhowra (S) Colliery of M/s. BCCL seeking relief there under by challenging the
alleged action.
From perusal of the case record and materials of the facts , it stands clear that the workman/petitioner concerned
is no longer interested to get to the finality of the case through adjudication as reflected in his petition moved before
the Court by Union Representative on workman’s behalf. However proceedings have been abruptly come to a grinding
halt over filing of documents on the part of the Management since long back . `When move for passing a No Dispute
Award from the side of the workman himself, the Industrial Dispute under Reference has been no longer in existence.
As usual the Tribunal would not have been left with no choice but to close the case dropping the proceedings in the line
of the natural justice and sheer disinterestedness on the part of the workman as well. So the case is wrapped up as no
Industrial Dispute. Accordingly an Award of ‘No Dispute’ is passed.
P. K. MISHRA, Presiding Officer
Uploaded by Dte. of Printing at Government of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi-110064
and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi-110054.
ALOK KUMAR
Digitally signed
by ALOK KUMAR
Date: 2018.09.26
14:43:50 +05'30'