5000 GI/2018

(5337)

jftLVªh la- Mh- ,y- (,u) 04@0007@2003µ05

REGD. No. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05

izkf/dkj ls izdkf'kr

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

lkIrkfgd

WEEKLY

la- 35]

ubZ fnYyh] flrEcj 2—flrEcj 8] 2018] 'kfuokj@Hkkæ 11—Hkkæ 17] 1940

No. 35]

NEW DELHI, SEPTEMBER 2—SEPTEMBER 8, 2018, SATURDAY/BHADRA 11—BHADRA 17, 1940

bl Hkkx esa fHkUu i`"B la[;k nh tkrh gS ftlls fd ;g i`Fkd ladyu ds :i esa j[kk tk lds

Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

Hkkx II—[k.M 3—mi&[k.M (ii)

PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)

Hkkjr ljdkj ds ea=kky;ksa (j{kk ea=kky; dks NksM+dj) }kjk tkjh fd, x, lkafof/d vkns'k vkSj vf/lwpuk,a

Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India

(Other than the Ministry of Defence)

िव मंालय

िव मंालय

िव मंालय

िव मंालय

(िवीय सेवाएं िवभाग

िवीय सेवाएं िवभाग

िवीय सेवाएं िवभाग

िवीय सेवाएं िवभाग)

नई दली, 3 अग त, 2018

का.आ

का.आ

का.आ

का.आ. 1318

1318

1318

1318.—कीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासकय योजन के िलए योग) िनयम, 1976 (1987 म यथा संशोिधत)

के िनयम 10 के उप िनयम (4) के अनुसरण म भारतीय टेट ब/क के सूचीब2 काया3लय/शाखा5 को अिधसूिचत करती है, िजनके 80% से

अिधक कम3चा8रय ने 9हंदी का काय3साधक :ान ा; कर िलया है : -

<.सं.

ब/क का नाम

शाखा5/काया3लय क सं>या

1.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

128

कुल

कुल

कुल

कुल

128

128

128

128

[फा.सं. 11016/2/2017-9हं.(अिध.)]

शैलेश कुमार 9संह, संयु? िनदेशक (राजभाषा)

5338

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

भारतीय टेट बक, अहमदाबाद मंडल

भारतीय टेट बक, अहमदाबाद मंडल

भारतीय टेट बक, अहमदाबाद मंडल

भारतीय टेट बक, अहमदाबाद मंडल राजभाषा िनयम

राजभाषा िनयम

राजभाषा िनयम

राजभाषा िनयम 1976

1976

1976

1976 के िनयम

के िनयम

के िनयम

के िनयम 10 (4)

10 (4)

10 (4)

10 (4) के अंतगत

के अंतगत

के अंतगत

के अंतगत

अिधसूिचत कराने हेतु कायालय#

अिधसूिचत कराने हेतु कायालय#

अिधसूिचत कराने हेतु कायालय#

अिधसूिचत कराने हेतु कायालय#/शाखा& क' सूची

शाखा& क' सूची

शाखा& क' सूची

शाखा& क' सूची

1.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

एमसीजी हलाद नगर शाखा

शॉप नं 5, थम तल

इA थ कारपोरेट,

हलादनगर

अहमदाबाद (गुजरात)

िपन – 380015

2.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

मानसी सक3 ल वCापुर शाखा

भूतल, ाइमेट

मदर िमक पैलेस के सामने

वCापुर

अहमदाबाद (गुजरात)

िपन – 380015

3.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

एिलसिDज आFम रोड शाखा

“काGाना” भूतल

आंबावाडी

अहमदाबाद (गुजरात)

िपन – 380006

4

भारतीय टेट ब/क

आरएसीपीसी आFम रोड

बी/2 अजंता कॉमशIयल सेAटर

आयकर सक3 ल के पास,

आFम रोड

अहमदाबाद (गुजरात)

िपन – 380004

5.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

क8रJ माबाग चार र ता मणीनगर शाखा

ाईम Kलाजा,

रावजीभाई टावर के सामने

कृMणबाग चार र ता,

मणीनगर

अहमदाबाद (गुजरात)

िपन – 380008

6.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

वा यपूNय चेOबर,

आFम रोड शाखा

शीतल वषा3 -II

नथूभाई हॉ पीटल के सामने

उ मानपुरा

अहमदाबाद (गुजरात)

िपन – 380013

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940

5339

7.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

प8रमल गाड3न शाखा

देव काOपलेQस, भूतल

सी.जी. रोड ,

प8रमल गाड3न के सामने

अहमदाबाद (गुजरात)

िपन – 380006

8.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

रामदेवनगर <ॉस रोड शाखा

इ कॉन पाक3

ओम टावर के सामने,

सेटेलाइट रोड

अहमदाबाद (गुजरात)

िपन – 380015

9.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

साइंस िसटी वे ट शाखा

स;क कारपोरेट हाऊस, भूतल

सुकन मॉल के पास,

साइंस िसटी रोड, सोला

अहमदाबाद (गुजरात)

िपन – 380060

10.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

Rरंग रोड बोपल शाखा

शॉप नं 1-7,

भूतल आSपाली एिQसओम

बोपल जंQशन के पास,

बोपल , अहमदाबाद (गुजरात)

िपन – 380058

11.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

धंधुका इ ट शाखा

शॉप नं 51,

रेवे टेशन के सामने

अडावन नाका,

मामलतदार काया3लय के पास

धंधुका, अहमदाबाद (गुजरात)

िपन – 382460

12.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

िमड कॉरपोरेट

सी जी रोड़ शाखा

शॉप नं.1 एवं 2,

सकुन िबजनस सेA टर, भूतल

वाि तक चार रा ता,

नवरंगपुरा, सी.जी. रोड

अहमदाबाद -380009

13.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

Aयू सी जी रोड शाखा

शॉप नं 29 से 34, सृजन II

5340

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

सहारा कॉ-आपरेटीव सोसायटी,

भूतल, Aयू सी.जी. रोड

अहमदाबाद (गुजरात)

िपन -382424

14.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

एसएमई आFम रोड़ शाखा

नगीनदास चेOबर, भूतल

उ मानपुरा, आFम रोड

अहमदाबाद (गुजरात)

िपन – 380014

15.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

जवाहर चौक, मणीनगर शाखा

साकार िब9डंग, जवाहर चौक

मणीनगर , अहमदाबाद (गुजरात)

िपन – 380008

16.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

एसबीआई इनटच मकरबा शाखा

बी -7 सफल सोली8टयर, भूतल

मकरबा, एस.जी. हाईवे

अहमदाबाद (गुजरात)

िपन - 380055

17.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

एसबीआई इनटच आंबावाडी शाखा

अUमेघ ऐिलगस 3 एवं 4, भूतल

कयाण Nवैलस3 के सामने,

आंबावाडी <ॉस रोड,

आंबावाडी, अहमदाबाद (गुजरात)

िपन – 380015

18.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

एसबीआई इनटच मोटेरा शाखा

4 डी कावर, 82-83, भूतल

आईआईटी इंजीिनयRरंग कालेज के सामने ,

िवसत-गांधीनगर हाईवे मोटेरा

अहमदाबाद (गुजरात)

िपन – 380005

19.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

एसबीआई इनटच हलादनगर शाखा

“पुMपक” 7 एवं 8 भूतल,

9संडीकेट ब/क के पीछे

हलादनगर गाड3न के सामने,

सेटेलाइट, हलादनगर

िजला- अहमदाबाद (गुजरात)

िपन -380015

20.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

एसबीआई इनटच िशवरंजनी शाखा

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940

5341

“िशवािलक हाई Wीट” 3 - ए बी सी डी,

भूतल, केशव बाग पाटI Kलोट के पास,

िशवरंजनी, वCापुर

अहमदाबाद (गुजरात)

िपन – 380015

21.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

एसबीआई इनटच सी.जी. रोड शाखा

ओिलव आकX ड 2, भूतल

िगरीश कोड 9Yंक <ास रोड के पास

ऑफ सी.जी. रोड, नवरंगपुरा

अहमदाबाद (गुजरात)

िपन – 380006

22.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

मालवण चौकडी शाखा

गांव – मालवण

तहसील – दसाडा

िजला – सुरेAनगर (गुजरात)

िपन – 382745

23.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

वंदेमातरम गोता शाखा

एन वाय कवायर Kलोट नं 253/4

गणेश काय लाइन के पास,

वृदावन हाईZस के सामने

चैनपुर, गोता

अहमदाबाद (गुजरात)

िपन – 382481

24.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

मोटेरा कोटेUर रोड शाखा

शॉप नं 5 से 8,

देव ाईड, भूतल

आतीश टॉवर रेिसडेAसी के पास,

मोटेरा , अहमदाबाद (गुजरात)

िपन – 380005

25.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

एस पी Rरंगरोड शीलज चौकडी शाखा

‘ए’ कवेयर,

भूतल शॉप नं 3 से 8

शीलज सक3 ल, एस पी Rरंग रोड

शीलज , अहमदाबाद (गुजरात)

िपन – 380059

26.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

चौसर रोड जेतलपुर शाखा

चौसर रोड,

एनएसआईटी कॉलेज के सामने

जेतलपुर, तहसील – दसकोई

5342

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

िजला – अहमदाबाद (गुजरात)

िपन – 382427

27.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

वटवा शाखा

आशापुरी रेसीडेAसी, भूतल,

शॉप नं 21 से 25

महाल[मी कॉन3र,

िव\ा स8रता के पास

गांव – वटवा

अहमदाबाद (गुजरात)

िपन – 382440

28.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

घणाद शाखा

गांव – घणाद

तहसील – लखतर

िजला- सुरेAनगर (गुजरात)

िपन – 363110

29.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

शाCीनगर शाखा

शॉप नं 2 एवं 3, भूतल,

िशवािलक यश काOपलेQस

शाCीनगर बीआरटीएस बस टेAड के सामने

132 Rरंग रोड, नारायणपुरा

अहमदाबाद (गुजरात)

िपन – 380013

30.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

गु]कुल रोड धांग^ा शाखा

िशवम काOपलेQस

िशव शि? होAडा ऐजेAसी के सामने

भागवतधाम के पास,

हलवद रोड

तहसील धांग^ा

िजला – सुरेAनगर (गुजरात)

िपन - 363310

31.

भारतीय टेट ब/क,

सेQटर 22 शाखा,

Kलॉट नं. 718,

मेईन शोप_ग सेAटर,

पंचदेव मंदर के पीछे,

सेQटर – 22,

िजला– गांधीनगर (गुजरात)

िपन - 382022

32.

भारतीय टेट ब/क,

भाट एयर पोट3 रोड शाखा,

Fी वामीनारायण िवFाम भुवन,

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940

5343

अपोलो हो पीटल के पास, भाट

िजला–गांधीनगर (गुजरात)

िपन – 382428

33.

भारतीय टेट ब/क,

सुमन टॉवर शाखा,

Kलॉट नं. 17,

िसनेमेQस कॉOKलेQस,

सुमन िसटी, सेQटर – 11,

िजला – गांधीनगर (गुजरात)

िपन – 382011

34.

भारतीय टेट ब/क,

एसबीआई इनटच इAफोिसटी शाखा,

आईटी टॉवर नं.1, भूतल

इAफॉसीटी कॉOKलेQस,

एयर पोट3 रोड़,

गांधीनगर

िजला– गांधीनगर (गुजरात)

िपन - 382009

35.

भारतीय टेट ब/क,

कॉलेज रोड़ मेहसाणा शाखा,

थम तल, जयदेव कॉOKलेQस,

पशाभाई पेWोल पंप के सामने,

हाईवे रोड़,

िजला–मेहसाणा (गुजरात)

िपन - 384002

36.

भारतीय टेट ब/क,

हाईवे रोड शाखा,

सवX नं. 657,

एचपी पेWोल पंप के पास,

aाम पंचायत काया3लय के सामने,

हाईवे, बेचराजी

िजला-मेहसाणा (गुजरात)

िपन - 384210

37.

भारतीय टेट ब/क,

मोढेरा रोड शाखा,

गोकुल मेरीडीयन कॉO K लेQ स,

टbको पाटI Kलॉट के पास,

मोढेरा रोड़,

िजला–मेहसाणा (गुजरात)

िपन - 384002

38.

भारतीय टेट ब/क,

एसबीआई इनटच शाखा,

5344

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ऑरबीट िबज़नेस हब,

दुकान नं. 1 से 6,

देना ब/क के पास,

राधनपुर रोड,

िजला–मेहसाणा (गुजरात)

िपन - 384002

39.

भारतीय टेट ब/क,

सहकारी िजन रोड शाखा,

उमा कॉOKलेQस,

Kलॉट नं. 9-10,

राजमहेल सोसायटी,

सहकारी िजन रोड,

9हंमतनगर,

िजला साबरकांठा (गुजरात)

िपन -383001

40.

भारतीय टेट ब/क,

पुंसरी शाखा, पुंसरी

तालुका – तलोद

िजला - साबरकांठा (गुजरात)

िपन - 383307

41.

भारतीय टेट ब/क,

अहमदाबाद हाईवे पालनपुर शाखा

1, 2 एवं 25,

ल[मी िवMणु कॉOKलेQ स,

गठामण पा8टया के पास,

पालनपुर

िजला-बनासकांठा (गुजरात)

िपन - 385001

42.

भारतीय टेट ब/क,

शंखेUर शाखा,

राधे शॉ9पंग सेAटर,

शोcम – Qयु

(भूतल एवं थम तल)

शंखेUर

िजला-पाटण (गुजरात)

िपन - 384246

43.

भारतीय टेट ब/क,

अखोल चौकड़ी शाखा,

कोDा फेQटरी के पास,

धानेरा रोड़, अखोल चौकड़ी,

तालुका डीसा

िजला-बनासकांठा (गुजरात)

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940

5345

िपन – 385535

44.

भारतीय टेट ब/क,

खाdज चौकड़ी शाखा,

Kलॉट नं. 949,

ोपटI नं. 1653,

खाdज चौकड़ी, मbधा रोड,

मेहमदाबाद

िजला-खेड़ा (गुजरात)

िपन – 387130

45.

भारतीय टेट ब/क,

मालपुर रोड़ शाखा,

3बी-4बी, काeत3केय सोसायटी,

मालपुर रोड

मोड़ासा

िजला-अरवली (गुजरात)

िपन - 383315

46.

भारतीय टेट ब/क,

एसबीआई इनटच उfरसंड़ा शाखा,

22 से 25,

एल hेयर िबड़_ग,

डी-माड3 के सामने

नड़ीयाद

िजला-खेड़ा (गुजरात)

िपन - 387001

47.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

Aयू कोठा8रया रोड़ शाखा

राधे कॉOKलेQस

सरदार गेस एजसी,

रोलेQस रोड

कोठा8रया राजकोट

िजला राजकोट (गुजरात)

िपन-360002

48

भारतीय टेट ब/क

टjलkग हॉि पटल ऐ8रया शाखा,

राजकोट टाइम hायर

अयोlया चौक

150 फट Rरंग रोड

िजला राजकोट (गुजरात)

िपन-360007

49

भारतीय टेट ब/क

पी डी मालिवया फाटक शाखा

दुकान सं.1 - 4

सनराईज़ अपाट3मट

जसाणी कूल गडल रोड

िजला राजकोट (गुजरात)

िपन-360004

5346

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

50

भारतीय टेट ब/क

रामधाम Kलॉट शाखा

मंगल करण

रामधाम Kलॉट, कालावाड़ रोड

िजला राजकोट (गुजरात)

िपन-360005

51

भारतीय टेट ब/क

वािणयावाड़ी शाखा

धोला8रया वािणया वाड़ी

गायdीनगर मु>य रोड

राधेJयाम डेयरी फाम3

िजला राजकोट (गुजरात)

िपन-360001

52

भारतीय टेट ब/क

एसबीआई इनटच शाखा

कालावाड़ रोड

“िबज़नस बे”, दुकान सं. 1 एवं 2

पंजाब हडा के सामने

कालावाड़ रोड,

िजला राजकोट (गुजरात)

िपन-360005

53

भारतीय टेट ब/क

जेतपर शाखा

मुकाम पो ट जेतपर (मछु)

जेतपर अिनयारी रोड, जेतपर

िजला मोरबी (गुजरात)

िपन-363630

54

भारतीय टेट ब/क

जनता फाटक शाखा

थम तल,

कंकु कॉOKलेQस

जनता फाटक

िजला-जामनगर (गुजरात)

िपन-361006

55

भारतीय टेट ब/क

केनेडी शाखा

केनेडी गाँव

तालुका कयाणपुर वाया- भा8टया

िजला देवभूिम qारका (गुजरात)

िपन-361315

56

भारतीय टेट ब/क

सतापर शाखा

सतापर

तालुका – जामजोधपुर

िजला - जामनगर (गुजरात)

िपन-360531

57

भारतीय टेट ब/क

एसबीआई इनटच शाखा

जी-1, Kले8टनम hायर

पाक3 कॉलोनी,

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940

5347

जोगस3 पाक3 के पास

िजला- जामनगर (गुजरात)

िपन-361008

58

भारतीय टेट ब/क

एसबीआई 8रलायंस सक3 ल शाखा

दुकान सं. 112-113,

r sस hायर

Kलॉट सं. 2 एवं 3, वाड3-6,

रोटरी सक3ल,

टेगोर रोड, गांधीधाम (कuछ)

िजला- कuछ (गुजरात)

िपन-370201

59

भारतीय टेट ब/क

सुभाषनगर चार र ता शाखा

Kलॉट सं. 8, डी/सी-2

सुभाषनगर मु>य माग3

गुcकुल के पास, गांधीधाम

िजला- कuछ (गुजरात)

िपन-370201

60

भारतीय टेट ब/क

सोनी बाजार शाखा

थम तल, Kलॉट सं. 271,

वाड3-12-बी,

गांधीधाम (कuछ)

िजला- कuछ (गुजरात)

िपन-370201

61

भारतीय टेट ब/क

एसबीआई इनटच टेगोर रोड शाखा

भगवती आकX ड Kलॉट सं.-2,

सेQटर-9, बीएसएनएल के सामने,

टेगोर रोड़ , गांधीधाम (कuछ)

िजला- कuछ (गुजरात)

िपन-370201

62

भारतीय टेट ब/क

माकXRटंग याड3 गडल शाखा

Fी गीता बेटरी सeव3स प8रसर

A यू माकXRटंग याड3 के सामने

गुंदाला चोकड़ी, गडल

िजला राजकोट (गुजरात)

िपन-360311

63

भारतीय टेट ब/क

संदपनी शाखा

िजला एवं सd Aयायालय भवन

संदपनी रोड

िजला-पोरबंदर (गुजरात)

िपन-360578

64.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

आर.सी. दf रोड़ शाखा

5348

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

103, बी.एन. चेOबस3

आर.सी. दf रोड

िजला-वडोदरा, (गुजरात)

िपन-390007

65.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

मोQसी शाखा

भूतल, चोरा वालु फलयु

शीव बाल मंदर के पास

गाँव मोQसी

तालुका सावली

िजला-वडोदरा (गुजरात)

िपन-391780

66.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

चकली सक3 ल शाखा

भागवत िनवास

चकली सक3 ल

जीईबी बड़ौदा के पास

िजला-वडोदरा, (गुजरात)

िपन-390007

67.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

जेतलपुर रोड शाखा

19-25, xलेिशयर कॉOKलेQस

जेतलपुर रोड

िजला-वडोदरा, (गुजरात)

िपन-390007

68.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

एसबीआई इनटच अकोटा शाखा

जी-2, पे8रडोट हब

ऊमI <ो9संग

मलहार पोल

िजला-वडोदरा, (गुजरात)

िपन-390007

69.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

िजला Aयायालय शाखा,

26/27, zज वाडी कॉOKलेQस,

वॉड3 नंबर 11 के पास,

साईनाथ माग3, नया कोट3 रोड

दवालीपुरा

िजला-वडोदरा, (गुजरात)

िपन-390015

70.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

िनलाOबर सक3 ल शाखा

दुकान नंबर 1 से 8

हनुमानजी मंदर के सामने

वासणा भायली रोड,

िजला-वडोदरा, (गुजरात)

िपन-391410

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940

5349

71.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

सोमातलाव शाखा,

दुकान नं. 1 से 8,

काAहा हाईZस,

सोमातलाव – डभोई रोड

िजला-वडोदरा (गुजरात)

िपन-390025

72.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

सुभानपुरा शाखा,

िवमलनाथ कॉOKलेQस Kलाज़ा,

सुभानपुरा हाई टेAशन रोड,

िजला-वडोदरा (गुजरात)

िपन-390007

73.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

जलाराम मंदर शाखा,

11-12, शीव शि? को-ओपरे8टव हाउ9संग सोसायटी,

जलाराम मंदर रोड,

कारेलीबाग,

िजला-वडोदरा (गुजरात)

िपन–390018

74.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

एसबीआई इनटच समा-सावली शाखा,

भूतल 36-37, लोटस ऑरा,

िलले8रया पाटI Kलॉट के सामने,

आईओसी पेWोल पOप के पास,

िजला-वडोदरा (गुजरात)

िपन-390024

75.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

एसबीआई इनटच फतेहगंज शाखा,

भूतल, इगल एपाट3मेAट,

फतेहगंज रोड,

िजला-वडोदरा (गुजरात)

िपन-390002

76.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

Aयू वीआईपी रोड शाखा,

साकार कॉOKलेQस,

सरदार ए टेट के पास,

Aयू वीआईपी रोड,

िजला-वडोदरा (गुजरात)

िपन – 390019

77.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

मbवड शाखा,

ओम कॉOKलेQस,

5350

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

शॉप नंबर 24 और 25,

मbवड चौकडी,

गाँव मbवड, तालुका पादरा

िजला-वडोदरा (गुजरात)

िपन - 391440

78.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

मसर रोड शाखा,

मेइन माकXट रोड,

मसर रोड,

तालुका पादरा

िजला-वडोदरा (गुजरात)

िपन – 391421

79.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

कोलेज रोड शाखा,

सी/8, Fीिनवास हाउ9संग सोसाईटी,

िसिवल कोट3 के सामने, िसनोर रोड,

डभोई, िजला - वडोदरा (गुजरात)

िपन -391110

80.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

कंजरी रोड शाखा,

िनलकंठ एवेAयू,

12 मंगलम पाक3,

कंजरी रोड, हलोल,

पंचमहल (गुजरात)

िपन – 389350

81.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

कडाणा शाखा,

दरवाजा नंबर 318

दवाडा चौकडी पर,

कडाणा, गाँव – भेमासर,

तालुका – कडाणा,

िजला- महीसागर (गुजरात)

िपन -389250

82.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

िचखोदरा शाखा,

मोटो वAडो,

बैठक मंदर के सामने,

िचखोदरा,

िजला-आणंद (गुजरात)

िपन -388320

83.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

ओड शाखा, सालवा खाडा,

िबग िमक डेरी के सामने,

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940

5351

मेईन बाज़ार, तालुका – ओड

िजला-आणंद (गुजरात)

िपन -388210

84.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

िजतोिडया रोड शाखा,

माcित पंद,

आकृित नगर के सामने,

आणंद-िजतोिडया रोड,

िजला-आणंद (गुजरात)

िपन -388001

85.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

भादरण शाखा,

सोना टेकरी, बस टेAड के पास,

भादरण, िजला-आणंद (गुजरात)

िपन -388530

86.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

आरएसीपीसी, पहली मंिजल,

एसबीआई सयाजीगंज शाखा िब9डंग,

आराधना िसनेमा के सामने,

सयाजीगंज, िजला-वडोदरा, (गुजरात)

िपन -390001

87.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

एसबीआई इनटच शाखा

जी-5, सन हाम3नी

फूलवाडी चौक, िहल Yाइव

िजला-भावनगर (गुजरात)

िपन - 364 002

88.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

Rरंग रोड शाखा

शॉप नं. 16-19, दी कैिपटल

150 फट Rरंग रोड,

टॉप {ी सक3 ल

िजला-भावनगर (गुजरात)

िपन -364001

89.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

सीएसी शाखा

पहली मंिजल,

नीलमबाग चौक

िजला-भावनगर (गुजरात)

िपन-364001

90.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

dापज शाखा

अलंग रोड, ाथिमक कूल के पास

5352

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

तहसील तलाजा

िजला-भावनगर (गुजरात)

िपन -364150

91.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

अकाला शाखा

aाम पंचायत भवन

तहसील लाठी

िजला-अमरेली (गुजरात)

िपन - 365430

92.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

गलकोटडी शाखा

एनएच 136

रामजी मंदर के पास

कूल वाली गली

तहसील बाबरा

िजला-अमरेली (गुजरात)

िपन - 365421

93.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

एसबीआई इनटच शाखा

भूतल, िमलेिनयम आकXड

झंझरडा वायपास चौकड़ी

िजला-जूनागढ़ (गुजरात)

िपन - 362001

94.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

वालािसमडी शाखा

तहसील जूनागढ़

िजला-जूनागढ़ (गुजरात)

िपन – 362011

95.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

जंगर शाखा

तहसील मािलया

िजला-जूनागढ़ (गुजरात)

िपन - 362255

96.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

खंढेरी शाखा

खंढेरी मु>य बाजार

िजला-गीर सोमनाथ (गुजरात)

िपन - 362150

97.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

उमरवाडा शाखा,

16/1 वािनया फिलयू

गाँव- उमरवाड़ा

तहसील - अंकलेUर,

िजला- भ]च (गुजरात)

िपन - 393001

98.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

लखी शाखा

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940

5353

दहेज एसईजेड-II

शासिनक काया3लय कॉOपलेQस

लखीगाम, तहसील वागरा

िजला – भcच (गुजरात)

िपन - 392002

99

भारतीय टेट ब/क

सेलाOबा शाखा,

अंबे aीन िसटी,

एपीएमसी के नजदीक

गोटपाड़ा, सेलाOबा

िजला – नम3दा (गुजरात)

िपन - 393025

100

भारतीय टेट ब/क

उमराज शाखा,

शॉप नOबर-5,

ए<ोपोिलस दाहेज,

बाईपास रोड, उमराज

िजला- भ]च (गुजरात)

िपन - 392001

101

भारतीय टेट ब/क

मजुरा गेट शाखा,

गीताभा कॉOपलेQ स,

मजुरा गेट

किडवाला कूल के पास,

Rरंग रोड

िजला-सूरत (गुजरात)

िपन - 395002

102

भारतीय टेट ब/क

शीतल शॉ9पंग सटर शाखा

1-3 पहली मंिजल,

शीतल शॉ9पंग hेयर,

टjनkग Kवाइंट, भटार रोड

िजला-सूरत (गुजरात)

िपन - 395001

103

भारतीय टेट ब/क

िस 2ी रेिसडसी शाखा

शॉप नOपर-13-14

िस 2ी रेिसडसी Aयू पाल रोड,

पाल-अडाजन,

तहसील- चौरसी

िजला-सूरत (गुजरात)

िपन – 394510

104

भारतीय टेट ब/क

अंबाजी माकXट शाखा

अंबाजी माकXट, कमेला दरवाजा,

5354

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Rरंग रोड,

िजला – सूरत (गुजरात)

िपन - 395002

105

भारतीय टेट ब/क

अड़ाजन हिजरा रोड शाखा

शॉप नं- 3-4

टाइटेिनयम hेयर िब9डंग

वे टन3 कॉ8रडोर

िजला-सूरत (गुजरात)

िपन - 395009

106

भारतीय टेट ब/क

एसबीआई इनटच वीआईपी रोड शाखा

शॉप नं- 10-12 एवं 14

]ंगटा शॉ9पंग सटर, नंदनवन-2

वीआईपी रोड,

िजला- सूरत (गुजरात)

िपन – 395007

107

भारतीय टेट ब/क

Aयू िसटी लाईट रोड शाखा

शॉप नं – 8 से 11

इको Kयूचड3 भूतल,

अनुपम बंगला के सामने

Aयू िसटी लाइट सूरत

िजला-सूरत (गुजरात)

िपन - 395007

108

भारतीय टेट ब/क

9संगनापुर कॉजवे शाखा

शॉप नOबर- 1-4

िसवर टोन कॉजवे रोड

बी/एच कंठा8रया हनुमान मंदर,

9संगनापुर

िजला- सूरत (गुजरात)

िपन -395004

109

भारतीय टेट ब/क

वीआईपी रोड भरथना शाखा

भगवान महावीर एजूकेशन फाउंडेशन

िहना बंगेलोज के पीछे,

वीआईपी रोड

भरथना, भटार रोड

िजला – सूरत (गुजरात)

िपन - 395007

110

भारतीय टेट ब/क

aीन िसटी रोड पाल सूरत,

शॉप न- 1 से 6 भूतल,

िनशाल आकXड

aीन िसटी

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940

5355

िजला –सूरत (गुजरात)

िपन - 395009

111

भारतीय टेट ब/क

एलपी सवानी रोड शाखा

शॉप नं -07 वुड hेयर एल पी

िशवािलक िहस के सामने,

अडाजन

िजला- सूरत (गुजरात)

िपन - 395009

112

भारतीय टेट ब/क

उिमया मंदर शाखा

62/8, उपल टॉवर,

अिUन रोड

िजला- सूरत (गुजरात)

िपन - 3950009

113

भारतीय टेट ब/क

एसबीआइ इनटच कैनाल रोड़ शाखा

कैनाल रोड, भीमराड

शॉप नं- 39,

मै|स शॉ9पंग कॉOKलेQस

अलथान भीमराड

िजला- सूरत (गुजरात)

िपन - 395017

114

भारतीय टेट ब/क

लाजपोर शाखा

लाजपोर सWल जेल शॉ9पंग कॉOKलेQस

सिचन नवसारी रोड

िजला – सूरत (गुजरात)

िपन - 394235

115

भारतीय टेट ब/क

योगी चौक शाखा

भूतल शॉप नं- 34-39,

िलयोनाड3 hेयर-

वाि तक Kलाजा के नजदीक

िजला-सूरत (गुजरात)

िपन - 395006

116

भारतीय टेट ब/क

9डंडोली शाखा

सी-11 से 20 माक3 Kवाइंट कॉOKलेQस

भूतल, 9डंडोली चार रा ता

9डंडोली

िजला-सूरत (गुजरात)

िपन - 394210

117

भारतीय टेट ब/क

खरचेिलया शाखा

अपर aाउंड लेवल,

जलाराम कॉOपलेQस. बावरी फिलया

5356

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

पो ट खरचेिलया

तहसील- मbआ, िसटी- बारडोली

िजला- सूरत (गुजरात)

िपन - 394240

118

भारतीय टेट ब/क

रोनवेल शाखा

रोनवेल िवभाग कृषक सेवा सहकारी मंडी भवन

गेट नं. 445,

धरमपुर तहसीलदार काया3लय प8रसर

िजला-वलसाड (गुजरात)

िपन - 396055

119

भारतीय टेट ब/क

विशयार शाखा,

Kलॉट नं- 41,

तपोवन सोसायटी

कंWी कब के नजदीक,

अतुल रोड, विशयार

िजला- वलसाड (गुजरात)

िपन - 396007

120

भारतीय टेट ब/क

पारडी सांधपोर शाखा

भूतल, कैलाश िब9डंग

कैलाश रोड

िजला-वलसाड (गुजरात)

िपन - 396001

121

भारतीय टेट ब/क

एसबीआई इनटच वापी शाखा

शॉप नं-1 A ,

भूतल फॉचु3न मॉल

Kलॉट नंबर-66/67, वापी

रेसल माइ9नंग के सामने,

जीआईडीसी माइ9नंग

िजला-वलसाड (गुजरात)

िपन - 396195

122

भारतीय टेट ब/क

िसलवासा रोड शाखा

शॉप नं-13-17, भूतल

फॉचु3न hेयर-1, वापी

चलाला

िजला-वलसाड (गुजरात)

िपन - 396191

123

भारतीय टेट ब/क

धरमपुर रोड शाखा

ओम Kलाजा िब9डंग

धरमपुर रोड, अबरामा

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940

5357

िजला-वलसाड (गुजरात)

िपन - 396001

124

भारतीय टेट ब/क

ितcपती Kलाजा शाखा

शॉप नं- 15-19

ितcपित Kलाजा वापी-दमन रोड

चलाला, वापी

िजला – वलसाड (गुजरात)

िपन - 396191

125

भारतीय टेट ब/क

िजला सेवासदन शाखा

} यारा, भूतल,

िजला सेवासदन , पनवाड़ी

िजला- तापी (गुजरात)

िपन -394650

126

भारतीय टेट ब/क

जमालपोर शाखा

वेदांत अपाट3मट -2,

शॉप नं - 1 और 2

ितगरा जकातनाका,

ितगरावाड़ी रोड

िजला – नवसारी (गुजरात)

िपन – 396445

127

भारतीय टेट ब/क

अंबाड़ा शाखा

िनशाल फािलया

तहसील एवं पो ट- नवसारी

गाँव – अबरामा

पदार बस टॉप

िजला – सूरत (गुजरात)

िपन - 396469

128

भारतीय टेट ब/क

एसबीआई इनटच

अडाजन सूरत शाखा,

शॉप नं. - G/2, भूतल,

}हाइट ओeच3ड,

शैल पेWोल पOप के पास,

एल.पी. सावनी रोड,

अडाजन रोड,

सूरत (गुजरात)

िपन -395009

5358

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

MINISTRY OF FINANCE

(Department of Financial Services)

New Delhi, the 3rd August, 2018

S.O. 1318.—In pursuance of sub-rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for official purposes of the

Union) Rules, 1976 (as amended in 1987), the Central Government, hereby notifies the listed Offices/ Branches of State

Bank of India, more than 80% of the staff whereof have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi:-

Serial

No.

Name of the Bank

Number of Branches/Offices

1.

State Bank of India

128

Total

128

[F.No. 11016/2/2017-OL(Noti.)]

SHAILESH KUMAR SINGH, Jt. Director (OL)

STATE BANK OF INDIA, LOCAL HEAD OFFICE, AHMEDABAD LIST OF

OFFICES/BRANCHES TO BE NOTIFIED UNDER RULE 10(4)

OF OFFICIAL LANGUAGE RULES 1976

1.

State Bank of India

MCG Prahladnagar Branch

Shop No 5, First Floor

Indraprasth Corporate

Prahaladnagar

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

PIN -380015

2.

State Bank of India

Mansi Circle – Vastrapur Branch

PRIMATE Ground Floor

Opp. Mother Milk Palace

Vastrapur

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

PIN- 380015

3.

State Bank of India

Ellis Bridge – Ashram Road Branch

Ground Floor “ KAIVANA”

Ambavadi

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

PIN – 380006

4

State Bank of India

RACPC Ashram Road

B/2 Ajanta Commercial Centre

Near Income Tax Circle

Ashram Road

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

PIN– 380004

5.

State Bank of India

Krishamabaug Char Rasta

Mani Nagar Branch

Prime Plaza ,

Opp. Ravji Bhai Tower

Krishamabaug Char Rasta ,

Mani Nagar

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

PIN -380008

6.

State Bank of India

Vasupunjya Chamber,

Ashram Road Branch

Shital Varsha II

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940

5359

Opp. Nathubhai Hospital

Usmanpura

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

PIN - 380013

7.

State Bank of India

Parimal Garden Branch

Dev Complex,

Ground Floor

C. G . Road

Opp. Parimal Garden

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

PIN -380006

8.

State Bank of India

Ramdevnagar Cross Road Branch

Iscon Park

Opp. Om Tower,

Satellite Road

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

PIN - 380015

9.

State Bank of India

Science City West Branch

Saptak Corporate House

Near Shukan Mall

Science City Road, Sola

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

PIN – 380060

10.

State Bank of India

Ring Road Bopal Branch

Shop No 1-7 Ground Floor

Amarapali Axiom

Near Bopal junction

Bopal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

PIN – 380058

11.

State Bank of India

Dhandhuka East Branch

Shop No. 51

Opp Rly. Station ,

Adavan Naka

Near Mamlatdar Office

Dhandhuka, Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

PIN – 382460

12.

State Bank of India

Mid Corporate C.G. Road Branch

Shop No. 1 & 2

Shukan Business Centre,

Ground Floor,

Swastik Char Rasta

Navrangpura, C.G. Road

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

PIN – 380009

13.

State Bank of India

New C.G. Road Branch

Shop No. 29 to 34 Sarjan II

Sahara Co-op. Society Ground Floor

New C.G. Road

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

PIN – 382424

14.

State Bank of India

SME Ashram Road Branch

Nagindas Chamber Ground Floor

Usmanpura, , Ashram Road

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

PIN – 380014

5360

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

15.

State Bank of India

Jawahar Chowk – Maninagar Branch

Sakar Building,

Jawahar Chowk

Maninagar

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

PIN – 380008

16.

State Bank of India

sbiINTOUCH Makarba Branch

Shri Kailash Harinarayan Agrawal

Safal Solitaire, B-7 Ground Floor

Makarba, S.G. Highway

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

PIN – 380055

17.

State Bank of India

sbiINTOUCH

Ambawadi Branch

Ashwamegh Elegance

3 & 4, Ground Floor

Opp- Kalyan Jwellers,

Ambawadi Cross Road,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

PIN – 380015

18.

State Bank of India

sbiINTOUCH Motera Branch

4 D Square ,

82-83 Ground Floor

Opp. IIT Engineering College

Visit -Gandhinagar Highway

Motera

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

PIN – 380005

19.

State Bank of India

sbiINTOUCH Prahladnagar Branch

“ Puspak” Ground Floor 7 & 8

Behind Syndicate Bank

Opp. Prahladnagar Garden

Satellite ,

Prahladnagar

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

PIN – 380015

20.

State Bank of India

sbiINTOUCH Shivranjani Branch

“ Shivalik High Street”

Ground Floor -3 A,B,C,D

Near Keshavbaug Party Plot

Shivranjani, Vastrapur

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

PIN – 380015

21.

State Bank of India

sbiINTOUCH C.G. Road Branch

Olive Arcade Ground Floor -2

Near Grish Cold Drink Cross Road

Off C.G. Road

Navrangpura

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

PIN – 380006

22.

State Bank of India

Malvan Chowkdy Branch

Village : Malvan

Tal : Dasada

Dist: Surendranagar (Gujarat)

PIN – 382745

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940

5361

23.

State Bank of India

Vande Matram Gota Branch

N Y Square, Plot No. 253/4

Near Ganesh Skyline

Opp. Vrindavan Height

Chenpur, Gota

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

PIN – 382481

24.

State Bank of India

Motera Koteshvar Road Branch

Shop No. 5 to 8, Dev Pride

Ground Floor,

Near Atishay Tower Residency

Motera, Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

PIN – 380005

25.

State Bank of India

S P Ring Road Shilaj

Chowkadi Branch

‘A’ Square,

Ground Floor Shop No. 3 to 8

Shilaj Cross Road

Shilaj , Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

PIN -380059

26.

State Bank of India

Chosar Road Jetalpur Branch

Chosar Road Opp. NSIT College

Jetalpur, Tal : Deskroi

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

PIN – 382427

27.

State Bank of India

Vatva Branch

Ashapuri Residence

Ground Floor Shop No 21 to 25

Mahalaxmi Corner

Near Vidya Sarita School , Vatva

Village : Vatva

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

PIN – 382440

28.

State Bank of India

Ghanad Branch

Village : Ghanad

Taluka : Lakhtar

Dist : Surendranagar (Gujarat)

PIN – 363110

29.

State Bank of India

Shastrinagar Branch

Shivalik Yash Complex

Grond Floor Shop No. 2 & 3

Opp. Shastrinagar BRTS Bus Stand

132 Ring Road

Naryanpura

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

PIN -380013

30.

State Bank of India

Gurukul Road Branch Dhangadra

Shivam Complex

Opp. Shiv Shakti Honda Agency

Near –Bhagvat Dham

Halvad Road

Dhrangadra

Dist : Surendranagar (Gujarat)

PIN – 363310

5362

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

31.

State Bank of India

Sector 22 Branch,

Plot No.718, Main Shopping Centre,

Behind Panchdev Mandir,

Sector – 22,

Gandhinagar (Gujrat)

Pin – 382022

32.

State Bank of India

Bhat Air Port Road Branch,

Shree Swaminarayan Vishranti Bhuvan,

Near Appolo Hospital,

Bhat, Dist. Gandhinagar (Gujrat)

Pin 382428

33.

State Bank of India

Suman Tower Branch,

Plot No. 17, Cinemax Complex,

Suman City, Sector-11,

Gandhinagar

Dist. Gandhinagar (Gujarat)

Pin 382011

34.

State Bank of India,

sbiINTOUCH Infocity Gandhinagar,

I T Tower No. 1, Ground Floor,

Infocity Complex, Air Port Road,

Gandhinagar

Dist. Gandhinagar (Gujarat)

Pin 382009

35.

State Bank of India

College Road Mehsana Branch,

1st Floor,

Jaidev Complex,

Opp.Pashabhai Petrol Pump,

Highway Road,

Mehsana (Gujarat)

Pin - 384002

36.

State Bank of India

Highway Road Branch,

Survey 657,

Near H.P. Petrol Pump,

Opp. Gram Panchayat Office,

Highway, Bechraji

Distt. Mehsana (Gujarat)

Pin 384210

37.

State Bank of India,

Modhera Road Branch,

Gokul Meridian,

Near Tahuko Party Plot,

Modhera Road

Mehsana

Dist. Mehsana- (Gujarat)

Pin - 384002

38.

State Bank of India,

sbiINTOUCH Branch,

Orbit Business Hub,

Shop No. 1 To 6,

Near Dena Bank,

Radhanpur Road

Mehsana (Gujarat)

Pin 384002

39.

State Bank of India,

Sahakari Jin Road Branch,

Uma Complex, Plot No. 9 -10,

Rajmahel Society, Sahakari Jin Road,

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940

5363

Himatnagar

Dist.Sabarkantha (Gujarat)

Pin - 383001

40.

State Bank of India,

Punsari Branch,

Punsari, Tal. Talod.

Dist. Sabarkantha, (Gujarat)

Pin - 383307

41.

State Bank of India

Ahmedabad Highway Palanpur Branch,

1, 2 & 25 Laxmi Vishnu Complex,

Near Gathaman Patiya,

Palanpur,

Dist. Banaskantha (Gujarat)

Pin - 385001

42.

State Bank of India

Shankheshwar Branch,

Radhe Shopping Centre,

Show Room- Q (GF & FF),

Shankheshwar

Dist. Patan (Gujarat)

Pin - 384246

43.

State Bank of India,

Akhol Chowkdi Branch,

Besides Cobra Factory,

Dhanera Road,

Akhol Chowkdi,

Ta. Deesa

Dist. Banaskantha (Gujarat)

Pin - 385535

44.

State Bank of India,

Khatraj Chowkdi Branch,

Plot No. 949, Property No. 1653,

Khatraj Chowkdi,

Mahudha Road,

Mehmdabad

Dist. Kheda (Gujarat)

Pin - 387130

45.

State Bank of India

Malpur Road Branch,

3B-4B, Kartikey Soceity,

Malpur Road,

Modasa

Dist. Aravalli (Gujarat)

Pin - 383315

46.

State Bank of India,

sbiINTOUCH Uttarsanda Branch,

22 to 25, ‘L’ Square Building,

Uttarsanda Road, Opp D-Mart

Nadiad

Dist. Kheda (Gujarat)

Pin - 387001

47.

State Bank of India

New Kothariya Road Branch

Radhey Complex

Opp. Sardar Gas Agency,

Rolex Road

Kothariya Rajkot

Dist : Rajkot (Gujarat)

Pin - 360022

48.

State Bank of India

Sterling Hospital Area Branch

"Time Square"

5364

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Ayodhya Chawk,

150 Feet Ring Road,

Dist : Rajkot (Gujarat)

Pin - 360007

49.

State Bank of India

P D Malaviya Fatak Branch

Shop No. 1-4, Sunrise Apartment

Opp Jasani School,

Gondal Road

Rajkot

Dist : Rajkot (Gujarat)

Pin - 360004

50.

State Bank of India

Ramdham Plot Branch

Mangal Kiran

Ramdham Plot,

Kalawad Road

Rajkot,Gujarat

Dist : Rajkot (Gujarat)

Pin - 360005

51.

State Bank of India

Vaniyavadi Branch

Dholaria's". Vania Wadi

Gayatrinagar Main Road

Opp. Radheshyam Dairy Farm - Rajkot

Dist : Rajkot (Gujarat)

Pin – 360001

52.

State Bank of India

sbiINTOUCH Branch

Kalawad Road

"Business Bay", Shop No.1 & 2

Opp. Punjab Honda, Kalawad Road

Dist : Rajkot (Gujarat)

Pin – 360005

53.

State Bank of India

Jetpar Branch

At & Post- Jetpar (Machhu)

Jetpar Aniyari Road,

Jetpar

Dist : Morbi (Gujarat)

Pin – 363630

54.

State Bank of India

Janta Fatak Branch

1st Floor, Kanku Complex

Janta Fatak Jamnagar

Dist: Jamnagar (Gujarat)

Pin : 361006

55.

State Bank of India

Kenedy Branch

Kenedy Village

Taluka : Kalyanpur

Via : Bhatia,

Dist : Devbhumi Dwarka (Gujarat)

Pin – 361315

56.

State Bank of India

Satapar Branch

Taluka - Jamjodhpur

Dist : Jamnagar (Gujarat)

Pin – 360531

57.

State Bank of India

sbiINTOUCH Branch

G-1, Platinum Square,

Park Colony,

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940

5365

Near Jogger's Par

Dist : Jamnagar

Gujarat

Pin – 361008

58.

State Bank of India

SBI Reliance Circle Branch

Shop No. 112-113,

Friend's Square

Plot No. 2&3, Ward -6,

Rotary Circle

Tagore Road

Gandhidham (Kutch)

Dist : Kutch (Gujarat)

Pin – 370201

59.

State Bank of India

Subhashnagar Char Rasta Branch

Plot No 8 , D/C-2

Subhashnagar Main Road

Near Gurukul,

Gandhidham

Dist : Kutch (Gujarat)

Pin – 370201

60.

State Bank of India

Soni Bazar Gandhidham Branch

1st Floor, Plot No. 271,

Ward 12-B,

Gandhidham

Dist : Kutch (Gujarat)

Pin – 370201

61.

State Bank of India

sbiINTOUCH Branch

Bhagwati Arcade

Plot No. 2, Sector 9,

Opp BSNL,

Tagore Road

Gandhidham

Dist : Kutch (Gujarat)

Pin – 370201

62.

State Bank of India

Marketing Yard Gondal Branch

Premises of Shree Geeta Battery Service

Opp New Marketing Yard

Gundala Chowkdi,

Gondal

Dist.: Rajkot (Gujarat)

Pin – 360311

63.

State Bank of India

Sandipani Branch

District & Session Court Building

Sandipani Road

Dist.: Porbandar (Gujarat)

Pin – 360578

64.

State Bank of India

R.C. Dutt Road Branch,

103, B.N. Chambers,

R.C. Dutt Road,

Vadodara (Gujarat)

Pin – 390007

65.

State Bank of India

Moxi Branch,

Ground Floor,

Chora Valu Faliyu,

Near Shiv Bal Mandir,

5366

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Village Mokshi,

Taluka Savli

Vadodara (Gujarat)

Pin - 391780

66.

State Bank of India

Chakli Circle Branch,

Bhagwat Niwas,

Chakli Circle,

Near GEB Baroda,

Vadodar (Gujarat)

Pin - 390007

67.

State Bank of India

Jetalpur Road Branch,

19-25, Glacier Complex,

Jetalpur Road,

Vadodara (Gujarat),

Pin - 390007

68.

State Bank of India

sbiINTOUCH Akota Branch,

G-2, Peridot Hub,

Urmi Crossing,

Malhar Pol,

Vadodara (Gujarat)

Pin - 390007

69.

State Bank of India

District Court Branch,

26/27, Vrajwadi Complex,

Near Ward No. 11,

Sainath Marg, New Court Road,

Diwalipura,

Vadodara (Gujarat)

Pin - 390015

70.

State Bank of India

Nilambar Circle Branch,

Shop No. 1 to 8,

Earth Artica,

Near Hanumanji Temple,

Vasna Bhayli Road,

Vadodara (Gujarat)

Pin - 391410

71.

State Bank of India

Somatalav Branch,

Shop No. 1 to 8,

Kanha Heights,

Somatalav-Dabhoi Road,

Vadodara (Gujarat)

Pin - 390025

72.

State Bank of India

Shubhanpura Branch,

Vimalnath Complex Plaza,

Shubhanpura High Tension Road,

Vadodara (Gujarat),

Pin - 390007

73.

State Bank of India

Jalaram Mandir Branch,

11-12, Shiv Shakti Co.

Op. Housing Society,

Jalaram Temple Road,

Karelibaug,

Vadodara (Gujarat)

Pin - 390018

74.

State Bank of India

sbiINTOUCH Sama Savli Branch,

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940

5367

GF 36-37, Lotus Aura,

Opp. Lilleria Party Plot,

Near IOC Petrol Pump,

Vadodara (Gujarat)

Pin - 390024

75.

State Bank of India

sbiINTOUCH Fatehganj Branch,

Ground Floor, Eagle Appt.

Fatehganj Main Road,

Vadodara (Gujarat)

Pin - 390002

76.

State Bank of India

New VIP Road Branch,

Sakar Complex,

Near Sardar Estate,

New VIP Road,

Vadodara (Gujarat)

Pin - 390019

77.

State Bank of India

Mahuvad Branch,

Om Complex,

Shop No. 24 & 25,

Mahuvad Chowkdi,

Village Mahuvad,

Taluka Padra,

Vadodara (Gujarat)

Pin - 391440

78.

State Bank of India

Masar Road Branch,

Main Market Road,

Masar Road,

Taluka Padra,

Dist. Vadodara (Gujarat)

Pin - 391421

79.

State Bank of India

College Road Branch,

C/8, Shrinivas Housing Society,

Opp. Civil Court,

Sinor Road, Dabhoi ,

Dist. Vadodara (Gujarat),

Pin - 391110

80.

State Bank of India

Kanjari Road Branch,

Nilkanth Avenue,

12 Mangalam Park,

Kanjari Road, Halol,

Dist. Panchmahals, (Gujarat)

Pin - 389350

81.

State Bank of India

Kadana Branch,

Door No. 318 at Diwada Chowkdi,

Kadana,

Village- Bhemasar,

Taluka – Kadana,

Mahisagar (Gujarat),

Pin – 389250

82.

State Bank of India

Chikhodara Branch,

Moto Vando,

Near Baithak Mandir,

Chikhodara,

Anand (Gujarat),

Pin - 388320

5368

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

83.

State Bank of India

Ode Branch,

Sal Va Khada,

Near Big Milk Dairy,

Main Bazar,

Taluka – Ode,

Anand (Gujarat),

Pin - 388210

84.

State Bank of India

Jitodia Road Branch,

Maruti Spand,

Opp. Akruti Nagar,

Anand-Jitodia Road,

Anand (Gujarat),

Pin - 388001

85.

State Bank of India

Bhadran Branch,

Sona Tekri,

Near Bus Stand,

Bhadran, Anand (Gujarat),

Pin – 388530

86.

State Bank of India

RACPC, 1st Floor,

SBI Sayajiganj Branch Building,

Opp. Aradhana Cinema,

Sayajiganj,

Vadodara (Gujarat),

Pin - 390001

87.

State Bank of India

sbiINTOUCH Branch

G-5, Sun Hormony

Fulwadi Chowk,

Hill Drive

Bhavnagar (Gujarat)

Pin - 364 002

88.

State Bank of India

Ring Road Branch

Shop No. 16-19,

The Capital

150 Feet Ring Road,

Top Three Circle

Bhavnagar (Gujarat)

Pin - 364 002

89.

State Bank of India

CAC Branch

1st Floor, Neelambaug Chowk

Bhavnagar (Gujarat)

Pin - 364 001

90.

State Bank of India

Trapaj Branch

Alang Road,

Beside Primary School

Tahsil Talaja

Dist. Bhavnagar (Gujarat)

Pin - 364 150

91.

State Bank of India

Akala Branch

Gram Panchayat Bhavan

Tahsil Lathi

Dist. Amreli (Gujarat)

Pin - 365 430

92.

State Bank of India

Galkotdi Branch

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940

5369

NH 136, Near Ramji Mandir

School Street

Tahsil Babara

Dist. Amreli (Gujarat)

Pin - 365 421

93.

State Bank of India

sbiINTOUCH Branch

Ground Floor,

Millenium Arcade

Janjharda Bypass Chowk

Dist. Junagadh (Gujarat)

Pin - 362001

94.

State Bank of India

Valasimdi Branch

Tahsil Junagadh

Dist. Junagadh (Gujarat)

Pin - 362 011

95.

State Bank of India

Jangar Branch

Tahsil Maliya

Dist. Junagadh (Gujarat)

Pin - 362 255

96.

State Bank of India

Khandheri Branch

Khandheri Main Market

Dist. Gir Somnath (Gujarat)

Pin - 362 150

97.

State Bank of India

Umarwada Branch

16/1, Vania Faliyu

Village - Umarwada

Taluka- Ankleshwar

Dist - Bharuch (Gujarat)

Pin – 393001

98.

State Bank of India

Lakhi Branch

Dahej SEZ - 2

Administrative Office Complex,

Lakhigam, Taluka-Vagra

Dist - Bharuch (Gujarat)

Pin - 392002

99.

State Bank of India

Selamba Branch

Ambe Green City,

Near APMC

Gotpada, Selamba

Dist - Narmada (Gujarat)

Pin - 393025

100.

State Bank of India

Umraj Branch

Shop No.5, Acropolis,

Dahej Bypass Road,

Village Umraj

Dist- Bharuch (Gujarat)

Pin - 392001

101.

State Bank of India

Majura Gate Branch

Geeta Prabha Complex,

Majura Gate

Near Kadiwala School

Ring Road

Dist - Surat (Gujarat)

Pin - 395002

5370

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

102.

State Bank of India

Sheetal Shopping Centre Branch

1-3, First Floor,

Sheetal Shopping Square,

Turning Point,

Bhatar Road, Surat (Gujarat)

Pin - 395001

103.

State Bank of India

Siddhi Residency Branch

Shop No. 13-14,

Siddhi Residency,

New Pal Road,

Pal-Adajan , Tahsil- Chorsi

Dist – Surat (Gujarat)

Pin - 394510

104.

State Bank of India

Ambaji Market Branch

Ambaji market,

Kamela Darwaja,

Ring Road,

Dist – Surat (Gujarat)

Pin - 395002

105.

State Bank of India

Adajan Hajira Road

Shop No. 3 & 4,

Titanium Square Building

Western Corridor

Dist – Surat (Gujarat)

Pin- 395009

106.

State Bank of India

sbiINTOUCH VIP Road Branch

Shop-10 to 12 &14,

Roongta Shopping Centre,

Nandanvan- 2,

VIP Road,

Dist – Surat (Gujarat)

Pin - 395007

107.

State Bank of India

New City Light Road Branch

Shop No. 8 to 11,

Eco Futurz,

Ground floor

Opp- Anupam Bunglows

New City Light Road

Surat (Gujarat)

Pin - 395007

108.

State Bank of India

Singanpur Causway Branch

Shop 1 to 4,

Silver Stone Causway Road

Behind- Kantharia Hanuman Temple

Singanpur

Dist – Surat (Gujarat)

Pin – 395004

109.

State Bank of India

VIP Road Bharthana Branch

Bhagwan Mahavir Education Foundation

Behind Heena Bunglows,

Bharthana Bhatar Road

Dist – Surat (Gujarat)

Pin - 395007

110.

State Bank of India

Green City Road Pal Branch

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940

5371

Shop No. 1 to 6,

Ground Floor

Nishal Arcade,

Green City

Dist – Surat (Gujarat)

Pin – 395009

111.

State Bank of India

L P Savani Road Branch

Shop No.7 Wood Square L P

Opp- Shivalikhles Hills

Adajan

Dist – Surat (Gujarat)

Pin – 395009

112.

State Bank of India

Umiya Mandir Branch

62/8 Uppal Tower

Ashwin Road

Dist – Surat (Gujarat)

Pin – 395006

113.

State Bank of India

sbiINTOUCH

Cenal Road Branch

Shop No. 39,

Magnus Shopping Complex,

Althan Bhimrad

Dist – Surat (Gujarat)

Pin - 395017

114..

State Bank of India

Lajpore Branch

Lajpore Central Jail Shopping Complex

Sachin - Navsari Road

Dist – Surat (Gujarat)

Pin - 394235

115.

State Bank of India

Yogi Chowk Branch

Shop No. 34 to 39

leonard square

Near- Swastik Plaza,

Dist – Surat (Gujarat)

Pin – 395006

116.

State Bank of India

Dindoli Branch

C-11 to C-20

Mark Point Complex,

Ground Floor

Dindoli Char Rasta

Dindoli

Dist – Surat (Gujarat)

Pin - 394210

117.

State Bank of India

Karcheliya Branch

Upper ground Level

Jalaram Complex

Bavri falia

Post - Karcheliya,

Tahsil – Mahuva

City - Bardoli

Dist – Surat (Gujarat)

Pin - 394240

118.

State Bank of India

Ronvel Branch

Ronvel Vibhag

Khedut Seva Sahkari Mandi Bhavan

5372

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Gate No. 445,

Dharampur Mamalatdar Kacheri Compound

Dist - Valsad (Gujarat)

Pin - 396055

119.

State Bank of India

Vashiyar Branch

Plot No. 41,

Tapovan Society

Near Country Club,

Atul Road

Vashiyar

Dist - Valsad (Gujarat)

Pin - 396007

120.

State Bank of India

Pardi Sandhpore Branch

Ground Floor,

Kailash Apartment,

Kailash Road

Pardi Sandhpor

Dist - Valsad (Gujarat)

Pin - 396001

121.

State Bank of India

sbiINTOUCH Vapi Branch

Shop No. 1 A , Ground Floor,

Fortune Mall,

Plot No. 66/67, Vapi

Opp-Resal Mining,

GIDC Mining

Dist - Valsad (Gujarat)

Pin - 396195

122.

State Bank of India

Silwasa Road Branch

Shop No. 13-17,

Ground Floor

Fortune Square-1, Vapi

Chala

Dist - Valsad (Gujarat)

Pin - 396191

123.

State Bank of India

Dharampur Road Branch

Om Plaza Building

Dharampur Road

Abrama

Dist – Valsad (Gujarat)

Pin - 396001

124.

State Bank of India

Tirupati Plaza Branch

Shop No. 15-19

Tirupati Plaza Vapi-Daman Road

Chala - Vapi

Dist - Valsad (Gujarat)

Pin - 396191

125.

State Bank of India

Jilla Seva Sadan Branch

Vyara

Jilla Seva Sadan Campus,

Panwadi , Dist - Tapi (Gujarat)

Pin - 394650

126.

State Bank of India

Jamalpore Branch,

Vedant Apartment-2,

Shop No. 1 & 2

Tigara Jakat Naka,

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940

5373

Tigrawadi Road

Dist - Navsari (Gujarat)

Pin - 396445

127.

State Bank of India

Ambada Branch,

Nishal Falia,

Tahsil & Post- Navsari

Village - Abrama

Dist - Navsari (Gujarat)

Pin – 396469

128.

State Bank of India

sbiINTOUCH Adajan,

Surat Branch

Shop No. G/2, Ground Floor,

White Orchid,

Near Shell Petrol Pump,

L P Savani Road,

Adajan Road Surat,

Dist – Surat (Gujarat)

Pin – 395009

नई दली, 3 अग त, 2018

का.आ

का.आ

का.आ

का.आ. 1319

1319

1319

1319.—कीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासकय योजन के िलए योग) िनयम, 1976 (1987 म यथा संशोिधत)

के िनयम 10 के उप िनयम (4) के अनुसरण म भारतीय टेट ब/क के सूचीब2 काया3लय/शाखा5 को अिधसूिचत करती है, िजनके 80% से

अिधक कम3चा8रय ने 9हंदी का काय3साधक :ान ा; कर िलया है : -

<.सं.

ब/क का नाम

शाखा5/काया3लय क सं>या

1.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

30

कुल

कुल

कुल

कुल

30

30

30

30

[फा.सं. 11016/2/2017-9हं.(अिध.)]

शैलेश कुमार 9संह, संयु? िनदेशक (राजभाषा)

राजभाषा िनयम, 1976 के िनयम 10(4) के अंतगत भारत सरकार के राजप म3

राजभाषा िनयम, 1976 के िनयम 10(4) के अंतगत भारत सरकार के राजप म3

राजभाषा िनयम, 1976 के िनयम 10(4) के अंतगत भारत सरकार के राजप म3

राजभाषा िनयम, 1976 के िनयम 10(4) के अंतगत भारत सरकार के राजप म3

अिधसूिचत करने के िलए कायालय# क' सूची

अिधसूिचत करने के िलए कायालय# क' सूची

अिधसूिचत करने के िलए कायालय# क' सूची

अिधसूिचत करने के िलए कायालय# क' सूची

1

भारतीय टेट ब/क

अमरावती थानीय

धान काया3लय

गनफ~Yी

हैदराबाद – 500001

तेलंगाना

2

भारतीय टेट ब/क

शासिनक काया3लय

26-1-52, कावारीतोटा, नगरमपालेम

गुAटूर – 522 004

आं^ देश

3

भारतीय टेट ब/क

€ेdीय Gवसाय काया3लय,

गुंटूर शहरी

5374

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

एस.बी.आई. Wेजरी शाखा के ऊपर,

2/14 Dोिडपेट

गुंटूर – 522 002

आं^ देश

4

भारतीय टेट ब/क

€ेdीय Gवसाय काया3लय,

गुंटूर aामीण

ल[मीपुरम मेन रोड

गुंटूर – 522 006

आं^ देश

5

भारतीय टेट ब/क

€ेdीय Gवसाय काया3लय,

नरसारावपेट

एस.बी.आई. - पी&एस शाखा के ऊपर,

अcंडेलपेट

नरसरावपेट – 522 601

आं^ देश

6

भारतीय टेट ब/क

€ेdीय Gवसाय काया3लय,

5गोल, दूसरा ताल,

उषोदया कॉOKलेQस

कनू3ल रोड,

5गोल – 523 002

आं^ देश

7

भारतीय टेट ब/क

€ेdीय Gवसाय काया3लय,

तेनाली

मुनु वामी नायडू Wीट,

गांधी चौक

तेनाली – 522 201

आं^ देश

8

भारतीय टेट ब/क

आर.ए.सी.पी.सी.

कावारी तोटा, नगरमपालेम

गुAटूर – 522 004

आं^ देश

9

भारतीय टेट ब/क

एस.एम.ई.सी.सी.,

ई.एस.आई. अ पताल के समीप,

कृMणानगर

गुंटूर – 522 007

आं^ देश

10

भारतीय टेट ब/क

शासिनक काया3लय

दूसरी मंिज़ल, कृMणा कॉOKलेQस

गायdी ए टेट

कनू3ल – 518002

आं^ देश

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940

5375

11

भारतीय टेट ब/क

€ेdीय Gवसाय काया3लय ,

€ेd-1, अनंतपुर शहरी

पहली मंिज़ल,

एस.बी.आई. िब9डंग

सा‚ नगर

अनंतपुर – 515001

आं^ देश

12

भारतीय टेट ब/क

€ेdीय Gवसाय काया3लय,

€ेd-2, अनंतपुर aामीण

पहली मंिज़ल,

एम.एस. देवी कॉOKलेQस

गुfी रोड

अनंतपुर – 515001

आं^ देश

13

भारतीय टेट ब/क

€ेdीय Gवसाय काया3लय ,

€ेd-3, कनू3ल शहरी

मकान सं.: 45-203- ए 55,

तीसरी मंिज़ल

िवMणु सा‚ एAQलेव

मैन रोड, वी.आर कॉलोनी

कनू3ल- 518003

आं^ देश

14

भारतीय टेट ब/क

€ेdीय Gवसाय काया3लय ,

€ेd-4 , कनू3ल aामीण

मकान सं.: 42/224 & 225

एन.आर पेट, मैन रोड

कनू3ल- 518002

आं^ देश

15

भारतीय टेट ब/क

€ेdीय Gवसाय काया3लय

€ेd-1 (कड़पा शहरी)

1/705, qारका नगर

कड़पा-516 004

आं^ देश

16

भारतीय टेट ब/क

€ेdीय Gवसाय काया3लय

€ेd-2 (कड़पा aामीण)

एस.बी.आई. मु>य शाखा, पहला माला

सेवन रोsस सक3 ल

कड़पा-516 001,

आं^ देश

5376

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

17

भारतीय टेट ब/क

€ेdीय Gवसाय काया3लय

€ेd-3 (ितcपित शहरी)

सहजा टॉवस3, तीसरा तल

रेिनगुंटा रोड

ितcपित-517 501

आं^ देश

18

भारतीय टेट ब/क

€ेdीय Gवसाय काया3लय

€ेd-4 (ितcपित aामीण)

सहजा टॉवस3, चौथा तल

रेिनगुंटा रोड

ितcपित-517 501

आं^ देश

19

भारतीय टेट ब/क

€ेdीय Gवसाय काया3लय

€ेd-5 (नेलूर)

अिनकट रोड, रंगनायकुलापेट

नेलूर-524 003

आं^ देश

20

भारतीय टेट ब/क,

€ेdीय Gवसाय काया3लय (सWल),

€ेd -1, िस8रपुरम,

बालाजीनगर,

िवशाखापƒनम - 530001

आं^ देश

21

भारतीय टेट ब/क,

€ेdीय Gवसाय काया3लय(aामीण),

€ेd -2, िसरीपुरम,

बालाजीनगर,

िवशाखापƒनम - 530001

आं^ देश

22

भारतीय टेट ब/क,

€ेdीय Gवसाय काया3लय

(अध3 शहरी),

€ेd -3, िसरीपुरम,

बालाजीनगर,

िवशाखापƒनम - 530001

आं^ देश

23

भारतीय टेट ब/क,

€ेdीय Gवसाय काया3लय,

€ेd -4, दूसरी मंिजल,

Fी प„ावती कयाण मंडप के ऊपर,

पेदपाडु रोड,

Fीकाकुलम-532001,

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940

5377

Fीकाकुलम िजला

आं^ देश

24

भारतीय टेट ब/क,

€ेdीय Gवसाय काया3लय,

€ेd -5, अलकनAदा कॉलोनी,

कांटोनमट ए8रया,

िवजयनगरम 535003

िवजयनगरम िजला

आं^ देश

25

भारतीय टेट ब/क

शासिनक काया3लय

टेट ब/क Q वेयर

कO बाला चेcवु

राजमहवरम – 533105

आं^ देश

26

भारतीय टेट ब/क

€ेdीय } यवसाय काया3लय (शहरी)

46-12-24, मौिनका K लाज़ा

दानावाईपेटा

राजमहवरम – 533101

आं^ देश

27

भारतीय टेट ब/क

€ेdीय } यवसाय काया3लय (aामीण)

6-2-2, िqतीय तल,

रवीA  भारती

टी.नगर, इA नीसपेटा

राजमहवरम – 533101

आं^ देश

28

भारतीय टेट ब/क

€ेdीय } यवसाय काया3लय

मकान सं>या : 1-175, ए.जी. रोड

अमलापुरम – 533201

आं^ देश

29

भारतीय टेट ब/क

€ेdीय } यवसाय काया3लय

11-4-7, िqतीय तल

नूकालO मा मंदर के सामने

रामारावपेटा

काकनाड़ा – 533004

आं^ देश

30

भारतीय टेट ब/क

€ेdीय } यवसाय काया3लय

थम तल,

मकान सं>या 3-19-8/9,

भूपाल K लाज़ा, भूपाल नगर

भाM यम कूल के समीप

ताडेप लीगुडेम – 534104

आं^ देश

5378

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 3rd August, 2018

S.O. 1319.—In pursuance of sub-rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for official purposes of the

Union) Rules, 1976 (as amended in 1987), the Central Government, hereby notifies the listed Offices/Branches of State

Bank of India, more than 80% of the staff whereof have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi:-

Serial

No.

Name of the Bank

Number of Branches/Offices

1.

State Bank of India

30

Total

30

[F.No.11016/2/2017-OL(Noti.)]

SHAILESH KUMAR SINGH, Jt. Director (OL)

LIST OF OFFICES TO BE NOTIFIED IN GOVT.OF INDIA GAZETTE UNDER

RULE 10(4) OF OFFICIAL LANGUAGE RULES, 1976

1

State Bank of India

Amaravati Local Head Office

Gunfoundry

Hyderabad – 500001

Telangana

2

State Bank of India

Administrative Office,

26-1-52, Kannavarithota,

Nagarampalem

Guntur – 522 004

Andhra Pradesh

3

State Bank of India

Regional Business Office,

Guntur Urban

Upstairs of SBI Treasury Branch,

2/14 Brodipet,

Guntur – 522 002

Andhra Pradesh

4

State Bank of India

Regional Business Office,

Guntur Rural,

Laxmipuram Main Road,

Guntur – 522 006

Andhra Pradesh

5

State Bank of India

Regional Business Office,

Narsaraopet

Upstairs of SBI P&S Branch,

Arundelpet

Narasaraopet – 522 601

Andhra Pradesh

6

State Bank of India

Regional Business Office,

Ongole , Second Floor,

Ushodaya Complex

Kurnool Road,

Ongole – 523 002

Andhra Pradesh

7

State Bank of India

Regional Business Office, Tenali

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940

5379

Munuswamy Naidu Street,

Gandhi Chowk

Tenali – 522 201

Andhra Pradesh

8

State Bank of India

R.A.C.P.C.

Kannavarithota,

Nagarampalem

Guntur – 522 004

Andhra Pradesh

9

State Bank of India

S.M.E.C.C.

Near E.S.I. Hospital,

Krishnanagar

Guntur – 522 007

Andhra Pradesh

10

STATE BANK OF INDIA

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE

2ND FLOOR, KRISHNA COMPLEX

GAYATRI ESTATES

KURNOOL- 518002

ANDHRA PRADESH

11

STATE BANK OF INDIA,

REGIONAL BUSINESS OFFICE,

REGION-1, ANANTAPUR URBAN

1 ST FLOOR SBI BUILDING,

SAI NAGAR,

ANANTAPUR-515001

ANDHRA PRADESH

12

STATE BANK OF INDIA

REGIONAL BUSINESS OFFICE,

REGION-2,

ANANTAPUR RURAL

1 ST FLOOR,

M.S DEVI COMPLEX

GOOTY ROAD

ANATAPUR -515001

ANDHRA PRADESH

13

STATE BANK OF INDIA

REGIONAL BUSINESS OFFICE,

REGION-3, KURNOOL URBAN

DNO : 45-203-A55, 3 RD FLOOR

VISHNU SAI ENCLAVE

MAIN ROAD, V. R. COLONY

KURNOOL-518003

ANDHRA PRADESH

14

STATE BANK OF INDIA,

REGIONAL BUSINESS OFFICE,

REGION-4, KURNOOL RURAL

DNO : 42/224 & 225

N R PET , MAIN ROAD

KURNOOL-518002

ANDHRA PRADESH

15

STATE BANK OF INDIA

REGIONAL BUSINESS OFFICE

REGION-1 (KADAPA URBAN)

1/705, DWARAKA NAGAR

KADAPA-516 004

ANDHRA PRADESH

5380

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

16

STATE BANK OF INDIA

|REGIONAL BUSINESS OFFICE

REGION-2 (KADAPA RURAL)

SBI MAIN BRANCH, 1ST FLOOR

SEVEN ROADS CIRCLE

KADAPA-516 001

ANDHRA PRADESH

17

STATE BANK OF INDIA

REGIONAL BUSINESS OFFICE

REGION-3 (TIRUPATI URBAN)

SAHAJA TOWERS, 3RD FLOOR

RENIGUNTA ROAD

TIRUPATI-517 501

ANDHRA PRADESH

18

STATE BANK OF INDIA

REGIONAL BUSINESS OFFICE

REGION-4 (TIRUPATI RURAL)

SAHAJA TOWERS, 4TH FLOOR

RENIGUNTA ROAD

TIRUPATI-517 501

ANDHRA PRADESH

19

STATE BANK OF INDIA

REGIONAL BUSINESS OFFICE

REGION-5 (NELLORE)

ANICUT ROAD, RANGANAYAKULAPET

NELLORE-524 003

ANDHRA PRADESH

20

State Bank of India,

Regional Business Office (Central),

Region-1,

Siripuram,

Balajinagar,

Visakhapatnam 530001

Andhra Pradesh

21

State Bank of India,

Regional Business Office (Rural),

Region-2, Siripuram,

Balajinagar,

Visakhapatnam 530001

Visakhapatnam District

Andhra Pradesh

22

State Bank of India,

Regional Business Office

(Semi Urban),

Region-3, Siripuram,

Balajinagar,

Visakhapatnam 530001

Andhra Pradesh

23

State Bank of India,

Regional Business Office,

Region-4, 2nd Floor,

Upstairs of Shri Padmavati Kalyana Mandap,

Pedapadu Road,

Srikakulam 532001

Srikakulam District

Andhra Pradesh

24

State Bank of India,

Regional Business Office,

Region-5,

Alakananda Colony,

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940

5381

Cantonment Area,

Vizianagaram 530001

Vizianagaram District

Andhra Pradesh

25

STATE BANK OF INDIA

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE

STATE BANK SQUARE

KAMBALA CHERUVU

RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM -533105

ANDHRA PRADESH

26

STATE BANK OF INDIA

REGIONAL BUSINESS OFFICE (URBAN)

46-12-24, MOUNIKA PLAZA

DANAVAIPETA

RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM -533101

ANDHRA PRADESH

27

STATE BANK OF INDIA

REGIONAL BUSINESS OFFICE (RURAL)

6-6-2, SECOND FLOOR

RAVINDRA BHARATI

T.NAGAR, INNESPETA

RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM -533101

ANDHRA PRADESH

28

STATE BANK OF INDIA

REGIONAL BUSINESS OFFICE

D.NO.1-175, A G ROAD

AMALAPURAM – 533201

ANDHRA PRADESH

29

STATE BANK OF INDIA

REGIONAL BUSINESS OFFICE

11-4-7, SECOND FLOOR

NEAR NUKALAMMA TEMPLE

RAMARAOPETA

KAKINADA – 533004

ANDHRA PRADESH

30

STATE BANK OF INDIA

REGIONAL BUSINESS OFFICE

FIRST FLOOR, D.NO.3-19-8/9

BHUPAL PLAZA, BHUPAL NAGAR

NEAR BHASHYAM SCHOOL

TADEPALLIGUDEM - 534104

ANDHRA PRADESH

5382

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

नई दली, 3 अग त, 2018

का.आ

का.आ

का.आ

का.आ. 1320

1320

1320

1320.—कीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासकय योजन के िलए योग) िनयम, 1976 (1987 म यथा संशोिधत)

के िनयम 10 के उप िनयम (4) के अनुसरण म भारतीय टेट ब/क के सूचीब2 काया3लय/शाखा5 को अिधसूिचत करती है, िजनके 80% से

अिधक कम3चा8रय ने 9हंदी का काय3साधक :ान ा; कर िलया है : -

<.सं.

ब/क का नाम

शाखा5/काया3लय क सं>या

1.

भारतीय टेट ब/क

29

कुल

कुल

कुल

कुल

29

29

29

29

[फा.सं. 11016/2/2017-9हं.(अिध.)]

शैलेश कुमार 9संह, संयु? िनदेशक (राजभाषा)

राजभाषा

राजभाषा

राजभाषा

राजभाषा िनयम 1976 के

िनयम 1976 के

िनयम 1976 के

िनयम 1976 के िनयम 10(4) के अंतगत अिधसूिचत कए जाने

िनयम 10(4) के अंतगत अिधसूिचत कए जाने

िनयम 10(4) के अंतगत अिधसूिचत कए जाने

िनयम 10(4) के अंतगत अिधसूिचत कए जाने वाले कायालय/शाखा क! सूची

वाले कायालय/शाखा क! सूची

वाले कायालय/शाखा क! सूची

वाले कायालय/शाखा क! सूची

1

भारतीय टेट ब/क

सूया3नगर शाखा 191,

सूया3नगर, कलमना रोड,

िजला : नागपुर

राAय: : : : महाराB

कूट सं- 31776,

िपन-440035

फ़ैDस : (0712) 2682100

2

भारतीय टेट ब/क

फाम3ल/ड शाखा

50, एसकेजे हाउस,

सटर पॉइंट होटल के पीछे,

रामदासपेठ, िजला : नागपुर,

राAय: महाराB

कूट सं. 21491,

िपन-440010

फ़ैDस: 0712) 2447788

3

भारतीय टेट ब/क

पावर िLड कैMपस शाखा,

नारी Nरंग रोड,

संीित न गर, िजला : नागपुर

राAय: : : : महाराB,

कूट सं. 21034, नागपुर

िपन-440026

फ़ैDस : (0712) 2653752

4

भारतीय टेट ब/क

एसबीआई इनटच Pेफक पाक3 ,

वीआईपी रोड,धरमपेठ,

िजला : नागपुर, राAय: : : : महाराB

कूट सं. 19099,नागपुर

िपन-440010

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940

5383

फ़ैDस : (0712) 2544220

5

भारतीय टेट ब/क

लकडगंज शाखा

Qलॉट सं. 42,

लकडगंज,छापS नगर चौक,

िजला : नागपुर,

राAय: : : : महाराB

कूट सं. 32657,नागपुर

िपन-440008

फ़ैDस : (00712) 07122735518

6

भारतीय टेट ब/क,

बेसा शाखा,

एसबीटी, फ़ॉरUयुन एMपायर,

बेलतरोडी रोड, मनीष नगर,

िजला : नागपुर,

राAय: : : : महाराB

कूट सं. 70875,

नागपुर-440037

फ़ैDस : (07103) 281320

7

भारतीय टेट ब/क

काँLेस नगर शाखा,

Qलॉट सं-9, मुंजे रोड,

काँLेस नगर,िजला : नागपुर,

राAय: : : : महाराB

कूट सं. 70602, नागपुर

िपन-440012

फ़ैDस :07120) 2436833

8

भारतीय टेट ब/क

बडकस चौक शाखा,

खिड़या कॉMQलेDस,

बडकस चौक,महल

िजला : नागपुर

राAय: महाराB

कूट सं. 20539,नागपुर

िपन-440002

फ़ैDस : (0712) 2436833

9

भारतीय टेट ब/क

आकाशवाणी चौक,

पूनम Qलाज़ा,

वागत लॉन के सामने,

िसिवल लाइन,

िजला : नागपुर,

राAय: : : : महाराB

कूट सं-51191,नागपुर

5384

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

िपन-440001

फ़ैDस :07120) 2540171

10

भारतीय टेट ब/क,

इनटच चंपुर शाखा,

Qलॉट सं. 02,

बापट नगर,

संत गजानन मंदर चौक,

नागपुर रोड,

चंपुर तालुका चंपूर

राAय: महाराB कूट सं.19245

िपन 442401

फ़ैDस : (7172) 266088

11

भारतीय टेट ब/क,

राजुरा शाखा,

आिसफाबाद रोड, राजुरा

तालुका चंपूर,

राAय: महाराB,

कूट सं. 20059

िपन 442905

फ़ैDस : (07173) 222138

12

भारतीय टेट ब/क,

खमारी शाखा,

Lाम पंचायत हाउस सं 891,

गेट नं 1548, हलबीटोला, गदया,

तालुका – भंडारा, राAय: महाराB,

कूट सं. 18922

िपन 441601

13

भारतीय टेट ब/क,

िमहान शाखा, सेDटर-17

सPल फ़ैिसिलटी िब9डंग

िमहान नागपुर,

तालुका – नागपुर

राAय: महाराB

कूट सं. 18676

िपन 441108

14

भारतीय टेट ब/क,

इनटच वधा3 शाखा,

जय संतोषी कॉMQलेDस,

धंतोली चौक, वधा3 तालुका – वधा3,

राAय: महाराB

कूट सं. 19239

िपन 442001

फ़ैDस : (07152) 253747

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940

5385

15

भारतीय टेट ब/क,

नवाथे Qलॉट शाखा,

दसारा मैदान के सामने

बडनेरा रोड, अमरावती

तालुका –अमरावती,

राAय: महाराB,

कूट-17754

िपन 444605

16

भारतीय टेट ब/क,

इनटच शाखा अमरावती शाखा,

नवाथे Qलॉट,

दसारा मैदान के सामने

बडनेरा रोड, अमरावती

तालुका –अमरावती,

राAय: महाराB

कोड:19228

िपन 444605

फ़ैDस : (0721) 2560956

17

भारतीय टेट ब/क,

राजापेठ अमरावती शाखा

बडनेरा रोड,

राजापेठ अमरावती,

तालुका : अमरावती,

राAय : महाराB, कूट-20603

िपन : 444601

फ़ैDस : (0721) 2576902

18

भारतीय टेट ब/क,

िचखलगाँव शाखा

सुधाताई जगZाथ,

बाबा नगर,वाई पॉइंट,

बाय पास के पास,

यवतमाल रोड, िचखलगांव ,

वणी, तालुका : यवतमाल,

राAय : महाराB, कूट-18988

िपन: 445304

19

भारतीय टेट ब/क,

लोहारा शाखा,

एकिवरा होटल के पास,

लोहारा यवतमाल

तालुका : यवतमाल,

राAय : महाराB,

कूट-18643

िपन: 445001

फ़ैDस : (07232) 249455

5386

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

20

भारतीय टेट ब/क,

मेन लाइन यवतमाल

सरदार चौक,

तांगा चौक के पास,

[ारा सेस एंड परचेस,

ऑफस िब9डंग यवतमाल

तालुका : यवतमाल,

राAय : महाराB, कूट-17870

िपन: 445001

21

भारतीय टेट ब/क,

इनटच यवतमाल शाखा,

शुभम, ितलक मारक मंदर के सामने

महादेव मंदर रोड िसिवल लाइंस

तालुका : यवतमाल,

राAय : महाराB, कूट-19250

िपन: 445001

फ़ैDस : (07232) 237948

22

भारतीय टेट ब/क,

वडगांव शाखा, िशव चौक,

बालापुर-पातुर रोड

पो ट – वडेगांव,

तालुका:बालापुर,

िजला : अकोला,

राAय : महाराB

कूट-18660

िपन: 444502

फ़ैDस : (07257) 231006

23

भारतीय टेट ब/क,

इन टच वािशम शाखा,

िनम3ल कॉMQलेDस,

वागत लॉ]स के पास

वािशम, िजला : : : : अकोला,

राAय : महाराB

कूट-19240

िपन: 444505

फ़ैDस : (07252) 234611

24

भारतीय टेट ब/क,

इन टच अकोला शाखा

गोर^ण रोड,

गोर^ण सं थान के पास

अकोला, िजला : अकोला,

राAय : महाराB

कूट-19244

िपन: 444004

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940

5387

फ़ैDस : (00724) 2458753

25

भारतीय टेट ब/क,

जठारपेठ अकोला शाखा,

टी मृित,वाकरेवाड़ी,

होली <ॉस का]वट कूल के पास,

जठारपेठ चौक,

अकोला, महाराB

िजला : अकोला,

राAय : महाराB

कूट-20582, िपन: 444001

फ़ैDस : (0724) 2450565

26

भारतीय टेट ब/क,

इन टच बुलढाणा शाखा

ध]व]तरी अ पताल के पास,

चैत]यवाड़ी, बुलढाणा,

तालुका एवं िजला : बुलढाणा

राAय : महाराB, कूट-19247

िपन: 443001

फ़ैDस : (07262) 246333

27

भारतीय टेट ब/क,

बालाजी मंदर चौक देउलगाँव शाखा

ई ट-1 शिनवारपेठ,

देउलगांवराजा, बुलढाणा,

तालुका एवं िजला : बुलढाणा

राAय : महाराB, कूट-20060

िपन: 443204

फ़ैDस : (07261) 232007

28

भारतीय टेट ब/क,

गांधी चौक शेनगांव शाखा

हाउस नं 241,गांधी चौक,

मंदर रोड, शेनगांव,

बुलढाणा डीटी

िजला : बीड, राAय: महाराB

कूट-21442 , िपन: 443203

फ़ैDस : (07265) 252744

29

भारतीय टेट ब/क,

िचखली रोड बुलढाणा शाखा

भारतीय टेट ब/क 4,

वाड3 नं 10, सनेनगर, िचखली रोड,

िजला : बीड, राAय : महाराB

कूट-21443 , िपन: 443001

फ़ैDस : (07262) 246615

5388

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 3rd August, 2018

S.O. 1320.—In pursuance of sub-rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for official purposes of the

Union) Rules, 1976 (as amended in 1987), the Central Government, hereby notifies the listed Offices/Branches of State

Bank of India, more than 80% of the staff whereof have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi:-

Serial

No.

Name of the Bank

Number of Branches/Offices

1.

State Bank of India

29

Total

29

[F.No.11016/2/2017-OL(Noti.)]

SHAILESH KUMAR SINGH, Jt. Director (OL)

List of Branches / Offices to be notified under rule 10(4) of Official Language Rules 1976

1

STATE BANK OF INDIA

SURYA NAGAR BRANCH,

191 SURYA NAGAR, KALMANA ROAD,

DIST: NAGPUR,

STATE: MAHARASHTRA

PIN : 440035

CODE: 31776

FAX : (0712) 2682100

2

STATE BANK OF INDIA

FARMLAND BRANCH

50, S K J HOUSE,

BEHIND CENTRE POINT HOTEL,

RAMDASPETH,NAGPUR,

DIST:NAGPUR,

STATE: MAHARASHTRA

CODE: 21491

PIN : 440010

FAX: (0712) 2447788

3

STATE BANK OF INDIA

POWER GRID CAMPUS BRANCH

SAMPRITI NAGAR,

NARI RING ROAD

NAGPUR, DIST : NAGPUR,

STATE: MAHARASHTRA

CODE: 21034

PIN : 440026

FAX: (0712) 2653752

4

STATE BANK OF INDIA

SBI INTOUCH TRAFFIC PARK BRANCH

VIP ROAD,

DHARAMPETH

NAGPUR 440010

DIST : NAGPUR,

STATE: MAHARASHTRA

PIN : 440010

CODE: 19099

FAX: (0712) 2544220

5

STATE BANK OF INDIA

LAKADGANJ BRANCH

PLOT NO. 42

LAKADGANJ CHHAPRUNAGAR CHOWK

NAGPUR,

DIST:NAGPUR,

STATE:MAHARASHTRA

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940

5389

PIN : 440008

CODE: 32657

FAX: (00712) 07122735518

6

STATE BANK OF INDIA

BESA BRANCH

SBT, FORTUNE EMPIRE,

BELTARODI ROAD,

MANISH NAGAR,

NAGPUR,

DIST: NAGPUR,

STATE:MAHARASTRA

PIN : 440037

CODE : 70875

FAX: (07103) 281320

7

STATE BANK OF INDIA

CONGRESS NAGAR BRANCH

CONGRESSNAGAR,

PLOT NO-9,

MUNJE MARG

DIST: NAGPUR, S

STATE: MAHARASHTRA

PIN : 440012

CODE : 70602

FAX: (07120) 2436833

8

STATE BANK OF INDIA

BADKAS CHOWK BRANCH

KHADIYA COMPLEX

BADKAS CHOWK, NAGPUR,

DIST: NAGPUR,

STATE: MAHARASHTRA

CODE:20539

PIN : 440002

FAX: (0712) 2775251

9

STATE BANK OF INDIA

AKAASHWANI CHOWK BRANCH,

POONAM PLAZA,

CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR

DIST : NAGPUR,

STATE: MAHARASHTRA

PIN : 440001

CODE :51191

FAX: (07120) 2540171

10

STATE BANK OF INDIA

INTOUCH CHANDRAPUR BRANCH

PLOT NO 02 BAPAT NAGAR,

SANT GAJANAN MANDIR CHOWK,

NAGPUR ROAD

DIST : CHANDRAPUR,

STATE: MAHARASHTRA

PIN : 442401

CODE : 19245

FAX: (7172) 266088

11

STATE BANK OF INDIA

RAJURA BRANCH

ASIFABAD ROAD, RAJURA

DIST-CHANDRAPUR,

STATE: MAHARASHTRA

PIN : 442905

CODE : 20059

FAX: (07173) 222138

5390

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

12

STATE BANK OF INDIA

KHAMARI BRANCH

GRAM PANCHAYAT

HOUSE NO.891

GAT NO 1548

HALBITOLA GONDIA,

DIST : BHANDARA,

STATE: MAHARASHTRA

PIN : 441601

CODE:18922,

13

STATE BANK OF INDIA

MIHAN BRANCH

SECTOR 17,

CENTRAL FACILITY BUILDING

MIHAN, NAGPUR

DIST : NAGPUR,

STATE: MAHARASHTRA

PIN : 441108

CODE:18676

14

STATE BANK OF INDIA

INTOUCH WARDHA BRANCH

JAI SANTOSHI COMPLEX,

DHANTOLI CHOWK

WARDHA, DIST:WARDHA,

STATE:MAHARASHTRA

PIN : 442001

CODE: 19239

FAX: (07152) 253747

15

STATE BANK OF INDIA

NAWATHE PLOT BRANCH

ATNAWATHE PLOT,

IN FRONT OFDASARAMAIDAN

BADNERA ROAD,

AMRAVATI

DIST : AMRAVATI,

STATE: MAHARASHTRA

PIN : 444605

CODE:17754

FAX: (0721) 2560956

16

STATE BANK OF INDIA

INTOUCH AMRAVATI BRANCH

NAWATHE PLOT,

INFRONT OF DASERA MAIDAN,

BADNERA RD, AMRAVATI

DIST : AMRAVATI,

STATE: MAHARASHTRA

PIN: 444605

CODE:19228

FAX: (00721) 2569840

17

STATE BANK OF INDIA

RAJAPETH AMRAVATI BRANCH

BADNERA ROAD,

RAJAPETH,

DIST : AMRAVATI,

STATE: MAHARASHTRA

PIN : 444601

CODE:20603

FAX: (0721) 2576902

18

STATE BANK OF INDIA

CHIKHALGAON BRANCH

BADNERA ROAD,

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940

5391

RAJAPETH, AMRAVATI

DIST : AMRAVATI,

STATE: MAHARASHTRA

PIN : 445304

CODE:18988

FAX: (0721) 257690

19

STATE BANK OF INDIA

LOHAARA BRANCH

NEAR EKVIRA HOTEL,

LOHARA,

DIST : YAVATMAL,

STATE: MAHARASHTRA

PIN : 445001

CODE:18643

FAX: (07232) 249455

20

STATE BANK OF INDIA

MAIN LINE YAVATMAL BRANCH

SARDAR CHOWK,

NEAR TANGA CHOWK,

C/O SALES & PURCHASES,

OFFICE BUILDING,

DIST : YAVATMAL,

STATE: MAHARASHTRA

PIN : 445001

CODE:17870

21

STATE BANK OF INDIA

INTOUCH YAVATMAAL

"SHUBHAM" OPPO TILAK SMARAK MANDIR

MAHADEO MANDIR ROAD

CIVIL LINES

DIST: YAVATMAL,

STATE: MAHARASHTRA

PIN : 445001

CODE:19250

FAX: (07232) 237948

22

STATE BANK OF INDIA

WADEGAON BRANCH

SHIV CHOWK",

BALAPUR-PATUR ROAD

AT POST-WADEGAON,

TQ-BALAPUR

DIST:AKOLA,

STATE : MAHARASHTRA

PIN : 444502,CODE:18660

FAX: (07257) 231006

23

STATE BANK OF INDIA

INTOUCH WASHIM BRANCH

SHIV CHOWK",

BALAPUR-PATUR ROAD

NIRMAL COMPLEX,

NEAR SWAGAT LAWNS

WASHIM,DIST AKOLA,

STATE: MAHARASHTRA

PIN : 444505

CODE:19240

FAX: (07252) 234611

24

STATE BANK OF INDIA

INTOUCH AKOLA BRANCH

GORAKSHAN ROAD

NEAR GORAKSHAN SANSTHAN,

AKOLA, DIST: AKOLA,

5392

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

STATE: MAHARASHTRA

PIN : 444004

CODE:19244

FAX: (00724) 2458753

25

STATE BANK OF INDIA

JATHARPETH AKOLA BRANCH

T SMRITHI,WAKAREWADI,

NEAR HOLYCROSS

CONVENT SCHOOL,

JATHARPET CHOWK,

DIST : AKOLA,

STATE: MAHARASHTRA

PIN : 444001

CODE:20582,FAX: (0724) 2450565

26

STATE BANK OF INDIA

SBI INTOUCH BULDHANA BRANCH

NEAR DHANWANTARI HOSPITAL,

CHAITANYAWADI, BULDANA,

TQ-DIST- BULDANA,

STATE:MAHARASHTRA

PIN : 443001

CODE:19247

FAX: (07262) 246333

27

STATE BANK OF INDIA

BALAJI MANDIR CHOWK

DEULGAON BRANCH

EAST-1, SHANIWARPETH,

DEULGAON RAJA,

DIST: BULDHANA,

STATE: MAHARASHTRA

PIN: 443204

CODE:20060

FAX: (07261) 232007

28

STATE BANK OF INDIA

GANDHI CHOWK

SHENGAON BRANCH

HOUSE NO 241,

GANDHI CHOWK

MANDIR ROAD,

SHENGAON, BULDANA DT

DIST: BEED,

STATE: MAHARASHTRA

PIN: 444203

CODE:21442

FAX: (07265) 252744

29

STATE BANK OF INDIA

CHIKHALI ROAD

BULDHANA BRANCH

STATE BANK OF INDIA 4,

WARD.NO.10,

SANENAGAR,

CHIKHLI ROAD,BULDHANA,

DIST: BEED,

STATE: MAHARASHTRA

PIN : 443001

CODE:21443

FAX: (07262) 246615

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940

5393

नई दली, 3 अग त, 2018

का.आ

का.आ

का.आ

का.आ. 1321

1321

1321

1321.—कीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासकय योजन के िलए योग) िनयम, 1976 (1987 म यथा संशोिधत)

के िनयम 10 के उप िनयम (4) के अनुसरण म द ओरएटल इं योरस कंपनी िलिमटेड के सूचीब2 काया3लय/शाखा5 को अिधसूिचत

करती है, िजनके 80% से अिधक कम3चा8रय ने 9हंदी का काय3साधक :ान ा; कर िलया है : -

<.सं.

िव`ीय सं था का नाम

काया3लय / शाखा5 क सं>या

1.

द ओरएटल इं योरस कंपनी िलिमटेड

18

कुल

कुल

कुल

कुल

18

18

18

18

[फा.सं. 11016/2/2017-9हं.(अिध.)]

शैलेश कुमार 9संह, संयु? िनदेशक (राजभाषा)

राजभाषा िनयम 1976 के िनयम (4) के अंतगत अिधसूिचत कए जाने वाले कायालय / शाखा क! सूची

राजभाषा िनयम 1976 के िनयम (4) के अंतगत अिधसूिचत कए जाने वाले कायालय / शाखा क! सूची

राजभाषा िनयम 1976 के िनयम (4) के अंतगत अिधसूिचत कए जाने वाले कायालय / शाखा क! सूची

राजभाषा िनयम 1976 के िनयम (4) के अंतगत अिधसूिचत कए जाने वाले कायालय / शाखा क! सूची

1

द ओ8रएcटल इंdयोरस कMपनी िलिमटेड

^ेeीय काया3लय -3, मुंबई

टाऊन सटर, टावर-1, छठा तल अंधेरी- कुला3 रोड

मरोल अंधेरी ( पूव3)

मुंबई

िपन : 400059

2

द ओ8रएcटल इंdयोरस कMपनी िलिमटेड

अंधेरी मंड़लीय काया3लय

दूसरा तल, डी. जे हाऊस, िवसन पेन कMपाऊंड,

जुना नगरदास रोड, सबवे के पास,

अंधेरी (पूव3), मुंबई

िपन - 400059.

3

द ओ8रएcटल इंdयोरस कMपनी िलिमटेड

जोगेgरी शाखा काया3लय

103/104, फ़ैजान अपाट3मट,एस. वी. रोड़,

जोगेgरी (प.) मुंबई

िपन – 400102

4

द ओ8रएcटल इंdयोरस कMपनी िलिमटेड

मािहम शाखा काया3लय

8, िवg िवनाल िबड़hग, थम तल,

जसन एंड जसन भगोही कर, माग3 मािहम ( प. )

मुंबई

िपन : 400016

5

द ओ8रएcटल इंdयोरस कMपनी िलिमटेड

बो8रवल मंडल काया3लय

शॉप नं. 7, भुमी सर वती,

गांजावाला लेन

चामुंडा सक3 ल के पास बो8रवली ( प. )

मुंबई

िपन : 400092

6

द ओ8रएcटल इंdयोरस कMपनी िलिमटेड

वसई शाखा काया3लय

5394

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

डी -2, डी. जे. हॉउस,

िवसन पेन कMबाउंड,

ओड नागाड3स रोड, अंधेरी (ई)

मुंबई

िपन : 400069

7

द ओ8रएcटल इंdयोरस कMपनी िलिमटेड

घाटकोपर मंडल काया3लय

शॉप जोन, 5 वी मंिजल,

एम. जी . रोड.

ब/क ऑफ इंिडया के नजदीक,

घाटकोपर ( प ).

मुंबई

िपन : 400086

8

द ओ8रएcटल इंdयोरस कMपनी िलिमटेड

ठाणे मंडल काया3लय

तीसरा तल, सर वती मंदीर,

मराठी Lंथ संLाहय

सुभाश रोड़, ठाणे

िपन : 400601

9

द ओ8रएcटल इंdयोरस कMपनी िलिमटेड

मुलुंड शाखा काया3लय

गाला नं. 1, अरोटा हाऊस,

तल मंिजल, पी.के. रोड

पूजा iलड बैक के नजदीक, मुलुंड ( प )

मुंबई

िपन : 400080

10

द ओ8रएcटल इंdयोरस कMपनी िलिमटेड

कयाण मंडल काया3लय

jी द`ा कृपा, गणेश बाग, मुरबाड रोड

कयाण ( प )

िजला: ठाणे

िपन : 421304

11

द ओ8रएcटल इंdयोरस कMपनी िलिमटेड

िभवंडी शाखा काया3लय

मैिe नाभगन िबडhग,

थम तल,

शाkओ िवlल कोपरे8टव बैक,

राज अली रोड,

डोबीवली (पू.)

िपन : 421201.

12

द ओ8रएcटल इंdयोरस कMपनी िलिमटेड

पनवेल मंडल काया3लय

िनलकंठ ेि टज,

Qलॉट नं. 73, तल मंिजल,

शmबु2े हॉि पटल के नजदीक

पनवेल

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940

5395

िपन : 4012

13

द ओ8रएcटल इंdयोरस कMपनी िलिमटेड

बेलापुर शाखा काया3लय

िव]दया कमnश3यल क़ॉMQलेDस,

चौथी मंिजल

सेDटर 11, Qलाट नं. 1,सी.बी.डी.

बेलापुर, नवी मुंबई

िपन: 400614

14

द ओ8रएcटल इंdयोरस कMपनी िलिमटेड

पेण शाखा काया3लय

मोरेgर टॉकज के सामने,

एस.टी. टड के नजदीक

पेण तालुका

िजला : रायगड़

पेण

िपन : 400702

15

द ओ8रएcटल इंdयोरस कMपनी िलिमटेड

वा को मंडल काया3लय

परेरा चMपस3, थम तल,

फ़ॉदर जोस रोड़

पो.बाDस नं. 105

वा को-दा-गामा

िपन : 403802

16

द ओ8रएcल इंdयोरस कMपनी िलिमटेड

पंिजम मंडल काया3लय

गोऊवेला चMबस3,

3 तीसरा तल हेलीडोरो सालगाडो रोड

पंिजम, गोवा,

िपन : 403001

17

द ओ8रएcटल इंdयोरस कMपनी िलिमटेड

मडगांव मंडल काया3लय

राजाpय^ पाक3,

एल. आई.सी िबडhग,

पहली मंिजल

लोयल कूल कोMबा के पीछे,

वी.एस. रोड़ कोMबा

मडगांव, गोवा

िपन : 403601

18

द ओ8रएcटल इंdयोरस कMपनी िलिमटेड

सावरडम शाखा काया3लय

दूसरी मंिजल, गफुर िबड़ीग, टेशन रोड

चचोरेम, गोवा

सावरडम

िपन : 403706

5396

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 3rd August, 2018

S.O. 1321.—In pursuance of sub-rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for official purposes of the

Union) Rules, 1976 (as amended in 1987), the Central Government, hereby notifies the listed Offices/Branches of The

Oriental Insurance Company Limited, more than 80% of the staff whereof have acquired the working knowledge of

Hindi:-

Serial

No.

Name of the Financial Institution

Number of Offices/ Branches

1.

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited

18

Total

18

[F.No.11016/2/2017-OL(Noti.)]

SHAILESH KUMAR SINGH, Jt. Director (OL)

List of Offices/Branches to be notified under Rule 10 (4) of Official Language Rule 1976

1

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited

Regional Office-3, Mumbai

Town Center -1, 6th Floor

Andheri-Kurla Road, Marol

Andheri ( E)

Mumbai

Pin : 400059

2

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited

D.O. Andheri

D-2, D.J. House, Wilson Pen Compound

Old Nagardas Road

Andheri ( E ) Mumbai

Pin : 400069

3

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited

Jogeshwari Branch Office

103/104, Faizan Apartment, S.V. Road

Jogeshwari ( W)

Mumbai

Pin: 4000102

4

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited

Branch Office Mahim

8, Vishva Vinal Building 1st floor

Behind Johnson & Johnson

Bhagohi Kir Marg

Mahim West Mumbai

Pin: 400016

5

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited

D.O. - Borivali

Shop No. 7, Bhoomi Saraswathi, Ganjawala

Lane

NR. Chamunda Circle, Borivali ( W)

Mumbai

Pin: 400092

6

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited

Branch Office Vasai

Lawrence Trade Centre, B/113, 1st floor

Navhar Road

Vasai-40120

7

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited

D.O. Ghatkopar

Shop Zone, 5th Floor, M.G, Road

Ghatkopar ( W )

Mumbai

Pin: 400086

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940

5397

8

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited

D.O. Thane

3rd Floor, Saraswati Manadir,

Marathi Granth Sangrahalaya

Subhash Road

Thane

Pin: 4000601

9

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited

Branch Mulund

Gala No.1, Ground Floor,

Aroto House

P.K.Road, Mulund (W)

Mumbai

Pin: 400080

10

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited

D.O. Kalayan

Shree Datta Krupa, Murbad Road

Kalyan West

Dist. : Thane

Pin: 421304

11

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited

Branch Office Bhiwandi

Maitri Nabhagan Building,

1st Floor, above

Shamrao Vithal Cooperative Bank

Raj Ali Road

Dombivali ( E )

Pin: 421201

12

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited

D.O. Panvel

Nilkant Prestige,

Plot No. 73, Gr. Floor

Near Sahastrabudhe Hospital

Panvel

Pin: 401206

13

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited

Branch Office Belapur

Vindhya Commercial Complex, 4th Floor

Sector-11, Plot No. , CBD

Belaupr

Navi Mumbai

Pin: 400614

14

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited

Branch Office Pen

Opp. Moreshwar Talkies,

Near S.T. Stand

Taluka Pen

Pen

Distict : Raigad

Pin: 4000702

15

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited

D.O. Vasco

Pereira Chambers, 1st Floor,

Fr. Jose Vaz Road

P.O. Box No. 105

Vaco-Da-Gama

Pin: 403802

16

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited

D.O. Panji

Gouveia Chambers, 3rd Floor,

Helidoro Salgado Road

Panji, Goa

Panji

5398

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Pin : 403001

17

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited

D.O. Madgaon

Rajadhapaksha Park,

Ground & 1st Floor Behind Loyola High

School

V S Road, Comba Margao

Goa, Pin: 403 601

18

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited

Branch Office Savardem

2nd Floor, Gafur Building, Station Road

Curchorem, Goa

Savordom

Pin: 403706

नई दली, 3 अग त, 2018

का.आ

का.आ

का.आ

का.आ. 1322

1322

1322

1322.—कीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासकय योजन के िलए योग) िनयम, 1976 (1987 म यथा-संशोिधत)

के िनयम 10 के उप-िनयम (4) के अनुसरण म द ओरएटल इं योरस कंपनी िलिमटेड के सूचीब2 काया3लय को अिधसूिचत करती है,

िजनके 80% से अिधक कम3चा8रय ने 9हंदी का काय3साधक :ान ा; कर िलया है : -

<.सं.

िव`ीय सं था का नाम

काया3लय / शाखा5 क सं>या

1.

द ओरएटल इं योरस कंपनी िलिमटेड

8

कुल

कुल

कुल

कुल

8

[फा.सं. 11016/2/2017-9हं.(अिध.)]

शैलेश कुमार 9संह, संयु? िनदेशक (राजभाषा)

राजभाषा िनयम 1976 के िनयम

राजभाषा िनयम 1976 के िनयम

राजभाषा िनयम 1976 के िनयम

राजभाषा िनयम 1976 के िनयम 10

10

10

10(4) के अंतगत अिधसूिचत कए जाने वाले कायालय

(4) के अंतगत अिधसूिचत कए जाने वाले कायालय

(4) के अंतगत अिधसूिचत कए जाने वाले कायालय

(4) के अंतगत अिधसूिचत कए जाने वाले कायालय क! सूची

क! सूची

क! सूची

क! सूची

1

द ओ8रएcटल इंdयोरस कंपनी िलिमटेड

^ेeीय काया3लय

4, लायंस रज

कोलकाता

िपन : 700001

2

द ओ8रएcटल इंdयोरस कंपनी िलिमटेड

मंडल काया3लय - 4

33, टीफन हाऊस

कोलकाता

िपन : 700001

3

द ओ8रएcटल इंdयोरस कंपनी िलिमटेड

सी. बी. यू.

7, रेड <ोस Qलेस

कोलकाता

िपन : 700001

4

द ओ8रएcटल इंdयोरस कंपनी िलिमटेड

मंडल काया3लय - हावड़ा

पी-4, डबसन लेन, चतुथ3 तल

हावड़ा

िपन : 711101

5

द ओ8रएcटल इंdयोरस कंपनी िलिमटेड

मंडल काया3लय - हिदया

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940

5399

सुपर माकqट कMQलेDस, दुगा3 चौक

हिदया

िपन : 721602

6

द ओ8रएcटल इंdयोरस कंपनी िलिमटेड

मंडल काया3लय - आसनसोल

उमा भवन, दूसरा तल, जी. टी. रोड

आसनसोल

िपन : 713301

7

द ओ8रएcटल इंdयोरस कंपनी िलिमटेड

नगर शाखा काया3लय -1

मलहोeा टावस3, िहल काट3 रोड

िसलीगुड़ी

िपन : 734401

8

द ओ8रएcटल इंdयोरस कंपनी िलिमटेड

नगर शाखा काया3लय - 2

िहल काट3 रोड

िसलीगुड़ी

िपन : 734401

New Delhi, the 3rd August, 2018

S.O. 1322.—In pursuance of sub-rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for official purposes of the

Union) Rules, 1976 (as amended in 1987), the Central Government, hereby notifies the listed Offices of The Oriental

Insurance Company Limited, more than 80% of the staff whereof have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi:-

Serial

No.

Name of the Financial Institution

Number of Offices/ Branches

1.

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited

8

Total

8

[F.No.11016/2/2017-OL(Noti.)]

SHAILESH KUMAR SINGH, Jt. Director (OL)

List of offices to be notified under Rule 10(4) of Official Language Rule l976

1

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited

Regional Office

4, Lyons Range

Kolkata

Pin – 700001

2

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited

Divisional Office - 4

33, Stiphen House

Kolkata

Pin – 700001

3

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited

CBU

7, Red Cross Place

Kolkata

Pin – 700001

4

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited

Divisional Office - Howrah

P-4, Dabsan Lane, 4th Floor

Howrah

5400

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Pin – 711101

5

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited

Divisional Office - Haldia

Super Market Complex, Durga Chawk

Haldia

Pin – 721602

6

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited

Divisional Office, Asansol

Uma Bhawan, 2nd Floor, G.T.Road

Asansol

Pin – 713301

7

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited

City Branch Office-1

Malhotra Towers, Hill Cart Road

Siliguri

Pin – 734401

8

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited

City Branch Office-2

Hill Cart Road

Siliguri

Pin – 734401

नई दली, 7 अग त, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 1323

1323

1323

1323.—भारतीय 8रजव3 ब/क अिधिनयम, 1934, (1934 का 2) क धारा 8 क उप-धारा (1) के खंड (ग) [ारा द`

शि?य का योग करते sए, के]ीय सरकार, एतtारा, jी सतीश काशीनाथ मराठे (ज]म ितिथ: 1.2.1950) को उ]ह नािमत कए जाने

क अिधसूचना क तारीख से चार वष3 क अविध के िलए अथवा अगले आदेश तक, जो भी पहले हो, भारतीय 8रजव3 ब/क के के]ीय बोड3

म अंशकािलक गैर-सरकारी िनदेशक के पद पर नािमत करती है।

[फा.सं. 1/14/2016-बीओ-I]

:ानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 7th August, 2018

S.O.1323.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 8 of the Reserve

Bank of India Act, 1934 (2 of 1934), the Central Government hereby nominates Shri Satish Kashinath Marathe (DOB:

1.2.1950) as part-time non-official Director on the Central Board of Reserve Bank of India for a period of four years

from the date of notification of his nomination, or until further orders, whichever is earlier.

[F. No. 1/14/2016-BO-I]

JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.

नई दली, 7 अग त, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 1324

1324

1324

1324.— भारतीय 8रजव3 ब/क अिधिनयम, 1934, (1934 का 2) क धारा 8 क उप-धारा (1) के खंड (ग) [ारा द`

शि?य का योग करते sए, के]ीय सरकार, एतtारा, jी वामीनाथन गुxमूnत3 (ज]म ितिथ: 4.3.1949) को उ]ह नािमत कए जाने क

अिधसूचना क तारीख से चार वष3 क अविध के िलए अथवा अगले आदेश तक, जो भी पहले हो, भारतीय 8रजव3 ब/क के के]ीय बोड3 म

अंशकािलक गैर-सरकारी िनदेशक के पद पर नािमत करती है।

[फा.सं. 1/1/2018-बीओ-I]

:ानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 7th August, 2018

S.O. 1324.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 8 of the Reserve

Bank of India Act, 1934 (2 of 1934), the Central Government hereby nominates Shri Swaminathan Gurumurthy (DOB:

4.3.1949) as part-time non-official Director on the Central Board of Reserve Bank of India for a period of four years

from the date of notification of his nomination, or until further orders, whichever is earlier.

[F. No. 1/1/2018-BO-I]

JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940

5401

नई दली, 13 अग त, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 1325

1325

1325

1325.—राBीयकृत ब/क (बंध एवं कण3 उपबंध) कम, 1970 के पैरा 9 के उप-पैरा (2) के खंड (ख) के साथ प8ठत

ब/ककारी कंपनी (उप<म का अज3न एवं अंतरण) अिधिनयम, 1970 क धारा 9 क उप-धारा (3) के खंड (ज) [ारा द` शि?य का

योग करते sए, के]ीय सरकार, एतtारा, jी गोपालरमण पzनाभन (ज]म ितिथ: 29.5.1955) को दनांक 14.8.2018 से दो वष3 क

अविध के िलए या अगले आदेश तक, जो भी पहले हो, ब/क आफ इंिडया के िनदेशक मcडल म अंशकािलक गैर-सरकारी िनदेशक के पद पर

पुन: नािमत करती है और ब/क के बोड3 के गैर-काय3पालक अpय^ के पद पर उनक िनयुि? को उ? अविध तक बढ़ाती है।

[फा.सं. 8/4/2018-बीओ-I]

:ानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 13th August, 2018

S.O. 1325.—In exercise of powers conferred by clause (h) of sub-section (3) of section 9 of the Banking

Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970, read with clause (b) of sub-paragraph (2) of paragraph

9 of the Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970, the Central Government hereby

re-nominates Shri Gopalaraman Padmanabhan (DoB: 29.5.1955) as part-time non-official Director on the Board of

Directors of Bank of India for a term of two years with effect from 14.8.2018, or until further orders, whichever is earlier,

and extends his appointment as non-executive Chairman of the bank’s Board for the said period.

[F. No. 8/4/2018-BO-I]

JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.

नई दली, 13 अग त, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 1326

1326

1326

1326.— राBीयकृत ब/क (बंध एवं कण3 उपबंध) कम, 1970 के पैरा 9 के उप-पैरा (2) के खंड (ख) के साथ प8ठत

ब/ककारी कंपनी (उप<म का अज3न एवं अंतरण) अिधिनयम, 1970 क धारा 9 क उप-धारा (3) के खंड (ज) [ारा द` शि?य का

योग करते sए, के]ीय सरकार, एतtारा, jी थोथला नारायणसामी मनोहरण (ज]म ितिथ: 7.4.1956) को दनांक 14.8.2018 से दो

वष3 क अविध के िलए या अगले आदेश तक, जो भी पहले हो, केनरा ब/क के िनदेशक मcडल म अंशकािलक गैर-सरकारी िनदेशक के पद

पर पुन: नािमत करती है और ब/क के बोड3 के गैर-काय3पालक अpय^ के पद पर उनक िनयुि? को उ? अविध तक बढ़ाती है।

[फा.सं. 8/4/2018-बीओ-I]

:ानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 13th August, 2018

S.O. 1326.— In exercise of powers conferred by clause (h) of sub-section (3) of section 9 of the Banking

Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970, read with clause (b) of sub-paragraph (2) of paragraph

9 of the Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970, the Central Government hereby

re-nominates Shri Thothala Narayanasamy Manoharan (DoB: 7.4.1956) as part-time non-official Director on the Board

of Directors of Canara Bank for a term of two years with effect from 14.8.2018, or until further orders, whichever is

earlier, and extends his appointment as non-executive Chairman of the bank’s Board for the said period.

[F. No. 8/4/2018-BO-I]

JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.

नई दली, 13 अग त, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 1327

1327

1327

1327.— यत: सुjी ऊषा अनंतसुमिणयन को दनांक 5.5.2017 क अिधसूचना के [ारा पद के काय3भार Lहण करने

क तारीख से, दनांक 13.8.2018 या अगले आदेश तक, जो भी पहले हो, इलाहाबाद ब/क के बंध िनदेशक एवं मु>य काय3कारी

अिधकारी के पद पर िनयु? कया गया था;

और यत: सुjी अनंतसुमिणयन को राBीयकृत ब/क (बंध और कण3 उपबंध) कम, 1970 के पैरा 8 के उप-पैरा (4) के

उपबंध के अनुसार दनांक 3.7.2018 के पe के [ारा कारण बताने का अवसर दया गया था क Dय न उ]ह बंध िनदेशक एवं मु>य

काय3कारी अिधकारी के पद पर रहते sए पंजाब नैशनल ब/क के काय3करण पर समुिचत िनयंeण रखने म असफल रहने के िलए पद से हटा

दया जाए, िजसके कारण ब/क क ैडी हाऊस शाखा, मुMबई म एसडiयूआईएफटी (ि व€ट) का दुxपयोग करके धोखाधड़ी क गई,

िजनका कई वष तक पता नहh चल सका, िजससे बड़ी रािश क धोखाधड़ी sई;

5402

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

और यत: इलाहाबाद ब/क के बोड3 से भी उ? उप-पैरा (4) के उपबंध के संदभ3 म परामश3 कया गया था;

और यत: कारण बताओ नो8टस के संबंध म सुjी अनंतसुमिणयन के उ`र सिहत मामले और इलाहाबाद ब/क के बोड3 क

8टQपिणय को pयान म रखते sए इलाहाबाद ब/क के बंध िनदेशक एवं मु>य काय3कारी अिधकारी के पद पर सुjी अनंतसुमिणयन के बने

रहने पर िवचार पंजाब नैशनल ब/क म उनक उ? असफलता के संदभ3 म कए जाने क आवdयकता है, के]ीय सरकार इससे संतु‚ है क

उ]ह उ? पद से हटाना इलाहाबाद ब/क के िहत म समयोिचत है;

अत: अब ब/ककारी कंपनी (उप<म का अज3न एवं अंतरण) अिधिनयम, 1970 क धारा 9 के अंतग3त द` शि?य का योग

करते sए के]ीय सरकार [ारा बनाई गई राBीयकृत ब/क (बंध और कण3 उपबंध) कम, 1970 के पैरा 8 के उप-पैरा (4) के उपबंध के

अंतग3त द` शि?य का योग करते sए के]ीय सरकार, इससे संतु‚ होने पर क सुjी अनंतसुमिणयन को इलाहाबाद ब/क के बंध

िनदेशक एवं मु>य काय3कारी के पद से हटाना इलाहाबाद ब/क के िहत म समयोिचत है, उ]ह, एतtारा, इस पद से तƒकाल हटाती है।

[फा.सं. 16/13/2018-बीओ-I]

:ानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 13th August, 2018

S.O. 1327.— Whereas Ms. Usha Ananthasubramanian was appointed as Managing Director and Chief

Executive Officer, Allahabad Bank, vide notification dated 5.5.2017, with effect from the date of her taking over charge

of the post, and up to 13.8.2018, or until further orders, whichever is earlier:

And whereas, Ms. Ananthasubramanian, was given opportunity in terms of the provisions of sub-paragraph (4)

of paragraph 8 of the Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970, to show cause vide

letter dated 3.7.2018 why she should not be removed from office for having failed in exercising proper control over the

functioning of Punjab National Bank while serving as its Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer, which enabled

the fraud in the bank through misuse of SWIFT at the bank’s Brady House, Mumbai Branch to persist undetected for

several years, snowballing into a large amount:

And whereas, the Board of Allahabad Bank was also consulted in terms of the provisions of sub-paragraph (4)

ibid.:

And whereas, after considering the matter, including Ms. Anathasubramanian’s reply to the show-cause notice

and the comments of the Board of Allahabad Bank, and considering that Ms Ananthasubramanian’s continuance in office

as Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer, Allahabad Bank needs to be viewed in the context of her failure as

aforesaid in Punjab National Bank, the Central Government is satisfied that it is expedient in the interests of Allahabad

Bank to remove her from the said office:

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred under the provisions of sub-paragraph (4) of paragraph 8 of

the Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provision) Scheme, 1970, made by the Central Government in

exercise of powers under section 9 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970, the

Central Government hereby removes Ms. Usha Ananthasubramanian from the office of Managing Director and Chief

Executive Officer of Allahabad Bank, with immediate effect, for the reason that it is satisfied that it is expedient in the

interests of Allahabad Bank to so remove.

[F. No. 16/13/2018-BO-I]

JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.

नई दली, 14 अग त, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 1328

1328

1328

1328.—सरकार, एतtारा, सुjी दि^ता दास, अपर सिचव, िव`ीय सेवाएं िवभाग, िव` मंeालय को तƒकाल भाव

से, अगले आदेश तक, अपने वत3मान काय3भार के अित8र? राBीय आवास ब/क के बंध िनदेशक एवं मु>य काय3कारी अिधकारी (एमडी एवं

सीईओ) के पद का अित8र? काय3भार स„पती है।

[फा.सं. 24/3(II)/2017-आईएफ-II]

मोद कुमार 9संह, अवर सिचव

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940

5403

New Delhi, the 14th August, 2018

S.O. 1328.—Government hereby assigns the additional charge of MD & CEO of National Housing Bank to

Ms. Dakshita Das, Additional Secretary, Department of Financial Services, Ministry of Finance, in addition to her

present responsibilities, with immediate effect, until further orders.

[F. No. 24/3(II)/2017-IF-II]

PROMODE KUMAR SINGH, Under Secy.

नई दली, 14 अग त, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 1329

1329

1329

1329.— jी jीराम कयाणरमन [ारा राBीय आवास ब/क (एनएचबी) के बंध िनदेशक एवं मु>य काय3कारी

अिधकारी (एमडी एवं सीईओ) [ारा 28 मई, 2018 को अपने पद से दए गए ƒयागपe को सरकार, एतtारा, एनएचबी अिधिनयम,

1987 क धारा 7(4) के अंतग3त वीकार करती है। उ]ह तƒकाल भाव से पदभार मु? माना जाएगा। पदधारी क ओर से सांिविधक

नो8टस देने क तीन महीने क अविध से छूट दी जाती है और शेष अविध के बदले वेतन तथा भ` के भुगतान से छूट देने को भी वीकृित

दी जाती है।

[फा.सं. 24/3(I)/2017-आईएफ-II]

मोद कुमार 9संह, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 14th August, 2018

S.O. 1329.—Resignation tendered by Shri Sriram Kalyanraman from the post of Managing Director & Chief

Executive Officer (MD & CEO), National Housing Bank (NHB) dated 28th May 2018, is hereby accepted by the

Government under Section 7(4) of the NHB Act, 1987. He shall stand relieved from the post with immediate effect.

Statutory notice period of three months on the part of the incumbent is waived off and exemption from payment of salary

and allowances in lieu thereof for the remaining period is granted.

[F. No. 24/3(I)/2017-IF-II]

PROMODE KUMAR SINGH, Under Secy.

नई दली, 30 अग त, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 1330

1330

1330

1330.—भारतीय िनया3त-आयात ब/क अिधिनयम, 1981 (1981 का 28) क धारा 6 क उप-धारा (1) के खंड (ड.) के

उप-खंड (i) [ारा द` शि?य का योग करते sए, के]ीय सरकार, एतtारा, डॉ. अरिव]द सुमिणयन के थान पर आnथ3क काय3

िवभाग, िव` मंeालय म संयु? सिचव (िनवेश) jी के. राजारमन को तƒकाल भाव से अगले आदेश तक भारतीय िनया3त-आयात ब/क

(एिDजम ब/क) के िनदेशक मcडल म िनदेशक के पद पर नािमत करती है।

[फा.सं. 9/16/2012-आईएफ-I]

सौMयिजत घोष, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 30th August, 2018

S.O. 1330.— In pursuance of Sub-clause (i) of Clause (e) of sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the Export Import

Bank of India Act, 1981 (28 of 1981), the Central Government hereby nominates Shri K. Rajaraman, Joint Secretary

(Investment), Department of Economic Affairs, Ministry of Finance as Director on the Board of Directors of Export

Import Bank of India (EXIM Bank) vice Dr. Arvind Subramanian with immediate effect until further orders.

[F. No. 9/16/2012-IF-I]

SOUMYAJIT GHOSH, Under Secy.

नई दली, 31 अग त, 2018

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ.

का.आ. 1331

1331

1331

1331.—भारतीय िनया3त-आयात ब/क अिधिनयम, 1981 (1981 का 28) क धारा 6 क उप-धारा (1) के खंड (ड.) के

उप-खंड (ii) [ारा द` शि?य का योग करते sए, के]ीय सरकार, एतtारा, jी राजीव ऋिष के थान पर यूिनयन ब/क आफ इंिडया म

एमडी एवं सीईओ jी राजकरन राय जी. को 01 िसतMबर, 2018 से अगले आदेश तक भारतीय िनया3त-आयात ब/क (एिDजम ब/क) के

िनदेशक मcडल म िनदेशक के पद पर नािमत करती है।

[फा.सं. 9/16/2012-आईएफ-I]

सौMयिजत घोष, अवर सिचव

5404

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 31st August, 2018

S.O. 1331.—In pursuance of Sub-clause (ii) of Clause (e) of sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the Export Import

Bank of India Act, 1981 (28 of 1981), the Central Government hereby nominates Sh. Rajkiran Rai G, MD & CEO, Union

Bank of India as Director on the Board of Directors of Export Import Bank of India (EXIM Bank) vice Sh. Rajeev Rishi

w.e.f. 1st September, 2018 until further orders.

[F. No. 9/16/2012-IF-I]

SOUMYAJIT GHOSH, Under Secy.

का)मक लोक िशकायत और प-शन

का)मक लोक िशकायत और प-शन

का)मक लोक िशकायत और प-शन

का)मक लोक िशकायत और प-शन मं.ालय

मं.ालय

मं.ालय

मं.ालय

(का)मक और /िश0ण िवभाग)

(का)मक और /िश0ण िवभाग)

(का)मक और /िश0ण िवभाग)

(का)मक और /िश0ण िवभाग)

नई द ली, 29 अग त, 2018

का.आ

का.आ

का.आ

का.आ. . . . 1332

1332

1332

1332.—कीय सरकार, दंड <या संिहता, 1973 (1974 का 2) क धारा 24 क उपधारा (8) [ारा दƒ त शिD तय

का योग करते sए, माननीय बंबई उ† ]यायालय क औरंगाबाद ि थत ]यायपीठ के सम^ कीय अ] वेषण i यूरो मामला सं0

आरसी2(एस)/2007-मुंबई (वी.जी.पा8टल हƒया मामला) म और अपील या पुनरी^ण ]यायालय के सम^ अपील या पुनरी^ण और

उनसे संबंिधत या उनसे आनुषंिगक क]ही अ]य मामल म उपि थत होने के िलए jी िनितन बी.सूय3वंशी अिधव?ा, को उनक िनयुि?

तारीख से तीन वष3 क अविध के िलए या मामले के िनपटारे क तारीख तक, जो भी पहले हो, िवशेष लोक अिभयोजक के Sप म िनयु?

करती है।

[फा. सं. 225/04/2018-एवीडी-।।]

एस. पी. आर. िeपाठी, अवर सिचव

MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS

(Department of Personnel and Training)

New Delhi, the 29th August, 2018

S.O. 1332.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (8) of section 24 of the Code of Criminal

Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Nitin B. Suryavanshi, Advocate as Special

Public Prosecutor for appearing in CBI case No. RC 2(S) /2007-Mumbai (V.G. Patil murder case) before the Hon’ble

Bombay High Court at Aurangabad Bench and in appeals or revisions before the Appellate or Revisional Courts and any

other matters connected therewith or incidental thereto, for a period of three years from the date of appointment or

disposal of the case, whichever is earlier.

[F.No. 225/04/2018-AVD-II]

S. P. R. TRIPATHI, Under Secy.

fons'k ea=kky;

(lh-ih-oh- izHkkx)

ubZ fnYyh] 9 vxLr] 2018

dk-vk-1333-—jktuf;d vkSj dksalqyh; vf/dkjh ('kiFk ,oa iQhl) ds vf/fu;e] 1948 (1948 dk 41) dh /kjk 2 ds

[akM (d) ds vuqlj.k esa dsaæ ljdkj ds }kjk lqJh iq"iyrk lh ts] futh lgk;d 9 vxLr] 2018 ls Hkkjr ds iz/ku dksalykokl] lSu

izQkaflLdks esa lgk;d dksalqyj vf/dkjh ds drZO;ksa dk ikyu djus ds fy, izkfèkÑr djrh gS A

¹la- Vh&4330@01@2015º

izdk'k pUn] funs'kd (dksalqyj)

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940

5405

MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS

(C.P.V. DIVISION)

New Delhi, the 9th August, 2018

S.O. 1333.—In pursuance of clause (a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular Officers (Oaths and

Fees) Act, 1948 (41 of 1948), the Central Government hereby authorizes Ms. Puspalatha C.J., Personal Assistant in

Consulate General of India, San Francisco to perform the Consular services as Assistant Consular Officer with effect

from 9th August, 2018.

[No. T-4330/01/2015]

PRAKASH CHAND, Director (Consular)

िव2ुत

िव2ुत

िव2ुत

िव2ुत मं.ालय

मं.ालय

मं.ालय

मं.ालय

नई दली, 4 िसतM बर, 2018

का.आ

का.आ

का.आ

का.आ.

.

.

. 1334

1334

1334

1334.—कीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासकय योजन के िलए योग) िनयम, 1976 के िनयम 10 के उप िनयम

(4) के अनुसरण म िव‡ुत मंeालय के शासिनक िनयंeणाधीन एनटीपीसी िलिमटेड के मौदा सुपर थम3ल पावर ोजेDट, पो ट-

मौदा, िजला-नागपुर-441104, िजसके 80 ितशत कम3चारीवृंद ने 9हंदी का काय3साधक :ान ा; कर िलया है, को एतtारा अिधसूिचत

करती है।

[सं. 11011/9/2017-9हंदी]

भारती, संयु? सिचव

MINISTRY OF POWER

New Delhi, the 4th September, 2018

S.O. 1334.—In pursuance of Sub Rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for Official Purpose of

the Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government hereby notify the Mouda Super Thermal Power Project, P.O. Mauda,

Distt. Nagpur-441104 of NTPC Limited under the administrative control of Ministry of Power, where 80% of the staff

have acquired working knowledge of Hindi.

[No. 11011/9/2017-Hindi]

BHARATI, Jt. Secy.

Je ,oa jkstxkj ea=kky;

ubZ fnYyh] 30 vxLr] 2018

dk-vk- 1335.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj iatkc ,.M

¯l/ cSad ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky la- 2] paMhx<+ ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 237@2012) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 30-08-2018

dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&12012@63@2011&vkbZvkj (ch&II)º

jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

New Delhi, the 30th August, 2018

S.O. 1335.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 237/2012) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court No. 2, Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Punjab

& Sindh Bank and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 30.08.2018.

[No. L-12012/63/2011-IR (B-II)]

RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer

5406

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT-II,

CHANDIGARH

Case No. ID No. 237 of 2012

Sh. Jasvir Singh S/o Sh. Tara Singh, R/o Village Kutti(Kishanpura),

Tehsil and District Bathinda(Punjab).

…Workman

Versus

1.

Punjab and Sindh Bank through its Zonal Manager,

Punjab and Sindh Bank Zonal Office, Bathinda(Punjab).

2.

Zonal Manager, Punjab and Sindh Bank Zonal Office,

Bathinda (Punjab).

3.

Manager, Punjab and Sindh Bank, Currency Chest,

Bathinda (Punjab).

…Management

AWARD

1.

A reference was received from the Government of India vide Letter No.L-12012/63/2011-IR(B-II), Dated

13.03.2012 under Clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputed Act,

1947(in short the Act) for adjudication of an industrial dispute, terms of which are as under:-

“Whether the action of the Management of the Zonal Manager, Punjab & Sind Bank, Zonal Office,

Bathinda/Manager, Punjab & Sind Bank, Currency Chest, Bathinda in terminating/dis-continuing the

services of Sh. Jasvir Singh S/o Sh. Tara Singh, Ex-Driver w.e.f. 16.04.2010 is just, fair and lega? What

relief the workman concerned is entitled to?

2.

Both the parties were put to notice and workman Sh. Jasvir Singh upon appearance filed statement of claim with

the averments that he was employed as Driver on permanent basis since January 2002. He was drawing a salary of

Rs.4,375/- per month. It has also alleged that service of the workman was terminated on 16.04.2010 without any notice,

enquiry and charge sheet etc. The juniors to the workman are still in service and after the termination of the workman,

other persons has been employed in his place. The workman has challenged his termination to be illegal with the law and

made a prayer for his reinstatement with continuity of service and full back-wages.

3.

The management contested the case of the workman by filing written statement wherein certain preliminary

objections were taken. In Para 3 of the preliminary objections, it is admitted that workman was engaged as casual

workman as a Driver purely on temporary basis as a stop gap arrangement. It is denied that he was employed as Driver

on permanent basis since January 2002. There was no regular appointment of the workman nor the post of Driver was

advertised. No application were invited nor any interview was conducted at the time of his engagement. It is a matter of

record that Branch Manager is not even a competent authority under the Rules to make any appointment of Driver. The

management has also disputed the number of working days. The management admitted that workman has served with a

legal notice dated 24.04.2010 on the management vide Annexure M-1. The management had also filed reply to the said

notice vide Annexure M-2. Kindly prayed has been made for disposal of the prayer.

4.

The workman in support of his case tendered in evidence his affidavit Ex.WW1/A along with document

Ex.WW1/1. There is no cross-examination of the workman as none was present on behalf of the management on

29.05.2018 when the case was listed for evidence of the workman. Resultantly, management was proceeded ex parte.

5.

It is clear from the perusal of the pleadings of the parties as well as of evidence of the workman that he was

engaged by the management as a Driver in January, 2002. The factum of engagement of Sh. Jasvir Singh workman as a

Driver has also been admitted by the management in its written statement as well as other documents. At this stage, it is

appropriate to refer to Para 3 of the preliminary objections made in the written statement filed by the management. It is

clearly admitted that Sh. Jasvir Singh workman i.e. Driver, was engaged as a casual workman purely on temporary basis.

There is also documentary evidence on record which further suggest that Sh. Jasvir Singh workman was in the

employment of the management as a Driver. Before filing the present case, the workman has served management with

legal notice Annexure M-1, wherein all the material facts are mentioned. The management had filed the reply to the

written notice vide Annexure M-2, wherein also it is clearly admitted that workman was engaged by the management-

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940

5407

bank on daily wager, casual basis to met the exigencies. However, no procedure was followed at the time of his

engagement. In Para 3 and 4 of the reply to the legal notice, it is further admitted that no procedure was followed at the

time of his engagement and it was not imperative for the management to give any notice or pay any compensation etc. to

the workman before his termination. This stand has been taken by the management before conciliation officer also.

6.

The Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Devinder Singh Vs. Municipal Council, Sanaur, AIR 2011 SC 2235 while

interpreting the definition of workman as contained in Section 2(S) of the Act rejected the contention of the management

that a casual or daily wager or a temporary employee engaged purely on casual basis is not covered by the definition of

workman. The relevant observations are in Para 13 of the judgment and the same are as under:—

“The source of employment, the method of recruitment, the terms and conditions of employment/contract of

service, the quantum of wages/pay and the mode of payment are not at all relevant for deciding whether or

not a person is a workman within the meaning of Section 2(S)of the Act. The definition of workman also does

not make any distinction between full-time and part-time employee or a person appointed on contract basis.

There is nothing in the plain language of Section 2(S) from which it can be inferred that only a person

employed on regular basis or a person employed for doing whole-time job is a workman and the one

employed on temporary, part-time or contract basis on fixed wages or as a casual employee or for doing duty

for fixed hours is not a workman.”

7.

It is thus, clear from the perusal of the above Para that every type of casual or daily worker is covered by the

definition of workman as contained in Section 2(S) of the Act. Since workman herein was admittedly engaged by the

management as a Driver, as such, he has covered by the definition of the workman under Section 2(S) of the Act.

8.

There is no merit in the stand taken by the management that no regular procedure was followed at the time of

engagement of the workman nor application was invited for the post of Driver. To my mind, the workman herein is not

seeking regularisation or permanent absorption with the management-bank simply because due procedure was not

followed at the time of engagement of the workman herein that would not give licence to the management to terminate

the service of the workman in arbitrary and illegal manner. There are several judgments of the Hon’ble Apex Court that

service of a daily wager or casual workman cannot be terminated without following the due procedure contained in

Section 25-F of the Act. Admittedly, in the present case, no show cause notice was served upon the workman before

ordering his termination nor one month salary in lieu of notice was given in advance to the workman at the time of his

termination. All these facts are duly admitted by the management in the written statement as well as reply to a legal

notice. It has been held in several decisions by the Hon’ble Apex Court as well as various High Courts that termination of

service of a workman, who has served for more than 240 days in a calendar year preceding his termination, will become

arbitrary and illegal unless one month notice or one month salary in lieu of such notice is given to such workman at the

time of his termination. In this regard, reference can be made to the case of Ajay Pal Singh Vs. Haryana Warehouse

Corporation 2056 Supreme Court cases and ONGC 2483 Supreme Court Mechanised Company Vs. Mechanised Union

2004 Supreme Court cases 544. Since in the present case, the management has throw all the norms of natural justice as

well as provisions of ID Act to the winds. As such, the action of the management is held to be totally arbitrary and illegal

under the law.

9.

Now the residual question is whether the workman is entitled for reinstatement of service with back wages.

Admittedly, the workman was not holding any regular post nor any procedure was followed by the management at the

time of his engagement as a Driver. But it is also a fact that management has been engaged him as Driver in this manner,

and workman has put more that 8 years of service.

10.

The Hon’ble Apex Court in case “Deepali Gundu Surwase Vs. Kranti Junior Adhyapak Mahavidyalaya” reported

as (2013) 10 SCC 324 has held as under:

“(i) In case of wrongful termination of service, reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages is the

normal rule.

(ii) Ordinarily, an employee or workman whose services are terminated and who is desirous of getting back

wages is required to either plead or at least make a statement before the adjudicating authority or the Court

of first instance that he was not gainfully employed or was employed on lesser wages. If the employer wants

to avoid payment of full back wages, then I has to plead and also lead cogent evidence to prove that the

workman wads gainfully employed and was getting wages equal to the wages he wads drawing prior to the

termination of service. This is so because it is settled law that the burden of proof of the existence of a

particular fact lies on the person who makes a positive averments about its existence. It is always easier to

prove a positive fact than to prove a negative fact. Therefore, once the employee shows that he was not

employed, the onus lies on the employer to specifically plead and prove that the employee was gainfully

employed and was getting the same or substantially similar emoluments.”

11. Hon’ble Apex Court in the case General Manager, Haryana Roadways Vs. Rudan Singh, reported as 2005 SCC

(L & S) 716 observed as under:—

‘‘There is no rule of thumb that in every case where the Industrial Tribunal gives a finding that the termination

of service was in violation of Section 25-F of the Act, entire back wages should be awarded. A host of factors

5408

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

like the manner and method of selection and appointment i.e. whether after proper advertisement of the vacancy

or inviting applications from the employment exchange, nature of appointment namely, whether ad hoc, short

term, daily wage, temporary or permanent in character, any special qualification required for the job and the

like should be weighed and balanced in taking a decision regarding award of back wages. One of the important

factors which has to be taken into consideration is the length of service, which the workman had rendered

with the employer. If the workman has rendered a considerable period of service and his services are

wrongfully terminated, he may be awarded full or partial back wages keeping in view the fact that at this age

and the qualification possessed by him he may not be in a position to get another employment. However,

where the total length of service rendered by a workman is very small, the award of back wages for the

complete period i.e. from the date of termination till the date of the award, which our experience shows is

often quite large, would be wholly inappropriate. A regular service of permanent character cannot be

compared to short or intermittent daily wage employment though it may be for 240 days in a calendar year.”

12.

The Hon’ble Apex Court while considering the violation of Section 25-F of the Act in Incharge Officer & Anr. V.

Shankar Shetty, (2010) 9 SCC 126: 2010 LLR 1137 and after referred to the various decisions, this Court held that the

relief by way of back wages is not automatic and compensation instead of reinstatement has been held to meet the ends

of justice and it reads as under:—

“2. Should an order of reinstatement automatically follow in a case where the engagement of a daily wager

has been brought to end in violation of Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(for short “the ID

Act”)? The course of the decisions of this Court in recent years has been uniform on the above question.

3. In Jagbir Singh V. Haryana State Agriculture Mktg. Board, (2009) 15 SCC 327, delivering the judgment of

this Court, one of the us (R.M. Lodha, J.) noticed some of the recent decisions of this Court, namely, U.P.

State Brassware Corpn. Ltd. V. Uday Narain Pandey, (2006) 1 SCC 479; Uttaranchal Forest Development

Corpn. V. M.C. Joshi, (2007) 9 SCC 353; State of M.P. v. Lalit Kumar Verma, (2007) 1 SCC 575; M.P.

Admn. V. Tribhuban, (2007) 9 SCC 748; Sita Ram v. Moti Lal Nehru Farmers Training Institute, (2008)5

SCC 75; Jaipur Development Authority v. Ramsahai, (2006) 11 SCC 684; GDA v. Ashok Kumar, (2008) 4

SCC 261 and Mahboob Deepak v. Nagar Panchayat, Gajraula, (2008) 1 SCC 575 and stated as follows:

(Jagbir Singh case (2009) 11 SCC 327, SCC pp. 330 & 335, paras 7 & 14)’’

“7. It is true that the earlier view of this Court articulated in many decisions reflected the legal position that if

the termination of an employee was found to be illegal, the relief of reinstatement with full back-wages would

ordinarily follow. However, in recent past, there has been a shift in the legal position and in a long line of

cases, this Court has consistently taken the view that relief by way of reinstatement with back-wages is not

automatic and may be wholly inappropriate in a given fact situation even though the termination of an

employee is in contravention of the prescribed procedure. Compensation instead of reinstatement has been

held to meet the ends of justice.

14. It would be, thus, seen that by a catena of decisions in recent time, this Court has clearly laid down that

an order of retrenchment passed in violation of Section 25F although may be set aside but an award of

reinstatement should not, however, be automatically passed.”

13.

Yet, in another latest judgment i.e. District Development Officer Vs. Kanti Lal 2018 LLR 225 while considering

the question of reinstatement along with back wages of a daily wager, who have put two and a half years of service, the

Hon’ble Apex Court granted a lump sum compensation of Rs.2.50 lac in lieu of reinstatement. The workman herein was

not holding a regular post of Driver and he was simply engaged as daily wager. Moreover, management has already

employed some other workmen in his place as such, having regard to duration of service, it would be in the interest of

justice and fair play if compensation of Rs.6 lac be awarded as lump sum compensation to the workman. Accordingly,

the reference is answered by holding that action of the management-bank Zonal Manager in terminating the service of

workman Jasvir Singh is unjust, unfair and illegal and a amount of Rs.6 lac is ordered to be paid as lump sum

compensation to the said workman by the management and in case, this amount is not paid within one month from the

date of publication of the award, the workman shall be entitled to the said amount with 6% interest from the date of

making of the reference till realisation. Let copy of the award be sent to the Central Government for publication of the

same as required under Section 17(2) of the Act.

Dated: 30.05.2018

Place: Chandigarh

A. C. DOGRA, Presiding Officer-cum-Link Officer

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940

5409

ubZ fnYyh] 30 vxLr] 2018

dk-vk-1336-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj cSad vkWiQ

cM+kSnk ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn (xqtjkr) ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 192@2004) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

30-08-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&12013@124@1998&vkbZvkj (ch&II)º

jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 30th August, 2018

S.O. 1336.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 192/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of

Bank of Baroda and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 30.08.2018.

[No. L-12013/124/1998-IR (B-II)]

RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 10th August, 2018

Reference: (CGITA) No. 192/2004

The Branch Manager,

Bank of India,

New Cloth Market Branch, New Cloth,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380001

…First Party

V/s

Shri Hitendra Vasudev Vyas,

D-40, Tulsi Kunj Society,

Behind Rajbaugh Society, Ghodasar, Maninagar,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

…Second Party

For the First Party No

:

Shri D.C. Gandhi

For the Second Party :

Shri V.J. Patel

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-12013/124/98–

IR(B-II) dated 14.05.1999 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Ahmedabad

(Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of Bank of India, New Cloth Market Branch, Ahmedabad in dismissing

Shri H.V. Vyas, Sub-Staff from the services of the Bank with effect from 23.07.1996 on the alleged charges of

misconduct levelled against him vide charge sheet no. ZO:PR:559 dated 16.12.1993 is legal and justified? If not,

then what relief the concerned workman is entitled to?”

1.

The reference dates back to 14.05.1999 and received on 28.06.1999 from Ministry of Labour and Employment,

New Delhi for adjudication and passing the award.

5410

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2.

In response to the notice issued to the parties, the second party workman H.V. Vyas submitted the statement of

claim Ex. 6 alleging that he has been appointed and working by/with the first party The Branch Manager, Bank of India,

New Cloth Market Branch, New Cloth, Ahmedabad, hereinafter referred to as “Bank of India” as Sub-staff Peon since

the year 1973. He was put under suspension and served with a charge sheet (Ex. 19) on 16.12.1993. In the charge sheet,

the following charges were levelled against him as under:

i.

It is reported that a fraud of Rs.160420.00 has been perpetrated by you in collusion with other staff members

of the Branch in fictitious S/B A/c No. 15352 in the name of one Shri Vinodkumar Prabhudas Gajjar and S/B

A/c No. 15463 in the name of one Shri Surendra Nanji Patel, by fabricating fictitious credit vouchers and

withdrawing funds thereafter and destroying/managing to destroy fictitious credit vouchers/withdrawal forms

etc.

ii.

You, in collusion with other staff members managed to open/got opened the above mentioned fictitious S/B

A/cs with an intention to commit a fraud and misappropriate the Bank’s funds.

iii.

You, in collusion with other staff members of the Branch, further managed to remove temporarily the

genuine P and L Credit vouchers of various heads and surreptitiously replaced these genuine vouchers with

fictitious credit vouchers of the same amount made out for the credit of above mentioned fictitious S/B A/cs,

alleged to have been opened by you in collusion with other staff members of the Branch thereby giving

fictitious and bogus credit entries to the above mentioned S/B A/cs. You thereafter knowingly, wilfully and

fraudulently managed to withdraw funds on various occasions from the above mentioned fictitious S/B A/cs.

You thereafter destroyed/managed to destroy the fake and fictitious vouchers fabricated by you in collusion

with other staff members and once again replaced the original P and L A/C credit vouchers stealthily in the

day’s bunch of vouchers. In order to suppress the fraud from coming to light, you further tempered with the

Bank’s documents and destroyed/managed to destroy all the withdrawal slips/forms drawn in S/B A/c No.

15352 and some of the withdrawal forms/slips drawn on/pertaining to S/B A/c No. 15463 in the name of one

Shri S.N. Patel.

iv.

Preliminary investigation has revealed that the following withdrawal forms available on branch record drawn

on fictitious S/B A/c No. 15463 in the name of S.N. Patel are allegedly filled in/signed in the name of S.N.

Patel by you.

Date

Amount

15.12.1992

Rs.6000/-

03.12.1992

Rs.6000/-

17.12.1992

Rs.1800/-

21.12.1992

Rs.6000/-

23.12.1992

Rs.3000/-

12.02.1993

Rs.4500/-

You have in your statement dated 29.04.1993 given before the Investigating Officer, Shri D. V. Almouls, confessed

having filled in 3 of the above mentioned withdrawal forms/slips i.e. dated 15.12.1992, 21.12.1992 and 12.02.1993 for

Rs.6000/-,Rs.6000/- and Rs.4500/- respectively.

Therefore, he was put under suspension and subjected to departmental enquiry where he was, without giving proper

opportunity of hearing and to defend himself, dismissed, therefore, he has prayed for reinstatement with back wages.

3.

The first party Bank of India vide written statement Ex. 11 has submitted that the second party workman has been

working as Sub-staff Peon in the Bank. During tenure of his duty as Sub-staff Peon at Bank’s New Cloth Market Branch

in the year 1992 and 1993, a fraud was perpetrated by this workman in collusion with other staff members of the branch

in fictitious Saving Bank Account No. 15352 in the name of one V.P. Gajjar and Saving Bank Account No. 15463 in the

name of one S.M. Patel by fabricating fictitious credit vouchers and withdrawing funds thereafter destroying fictitious

credit vouchers and withdrawing funds with an intention to commit fraud and misappropriate the Bank’s money. The

workman further managed to remove the genuine profit and loss vouchers of various heads and surreptitiously placed the

general vouchers with fictitious credit vouchers of the same amount made out for the credit of the above mentioned

fictitious saving bank accounts thereby giving fictitious and bogus credit entries to the above mentioned savings bank

accounts. The workman concerned thereafter knowingly, wilfully and fraudulently managed to withdraw funds on

various occasions from the above mentioned fictitious saving bank accounts and thereafter managed to destroy the face

and fictitious vouchers fabricated by him in collusion with other staff members and again replaced the original profit and

loss account credit vouchers stealthily in the day’s bunch of vouchers. In order to suppress the fraud from coming to

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940

5411

light, the workman concerned further tampered with the bank’s documents and destroyed all the withdrawal slips/forms

drawn on savings bank account no. 15352 and some withdrawal slips pertaining to saving bank account no. 15463.

Therefore, the bank keeping, the charges levelled and proved against the workman, in the mind, first put him under

suspension vide order dated 26.06.1993 and after Charge No. i and iii conclusively proved and Charge No. ii partly

proved, issued him a show cause notice on 10.04.1996 and after providing him an opportunity of personal hearing,

dismissed him from service vide order dated 23.07.1996 as per the bi-partite settlement dated 14.02.1995. The order

provided the workman in option for appeal which the workman availed. The appeal was dismissed and his services were

terminated. During enquiry, personal hearing was given. There was no violation of principle of natural justice. Hence the

prayer sought by the second party in his statement of claim has no force and is liable to be dismissed.

4.

On the basis of the pleadings, the following issues arise:

I.

Whether the action of the management of Bank of India, New Cloth Market Branch, Ahmedabad in

dismissing Shri H.V. Vyas, Sub-Staff from the services of the Bank with effect from 23.07.1996 on the

alleged charges of misconduct levelled against him vide charge sheet no. ZO:PR:559 dated 16.12.1993 is

legal and justified?

II.

To what relief, if any, the concerned employee is entitled?

5.

Issue No. I and II: Both the issues are interrelated, therefore, are to be decided together. The burden of proof of

these issues was lying on the second party workman. As the second party workman did not challenge the legality of the

enquiry report and departmental proceedings, therefore, the Issue No. I stand proved.

6.

The learned counsel for the workman argued on the point of punishment referring Deepali Gundu Surwase V/s

Kranti Junior Adhyapak and others, 2013 (139) FLR 541 SC, wherein the apex court has held that if action taken against

the employee by the employer is found to be ultra-vires, relevant statutory provisions of principle of natural justice by a

competent court and the employee shall be reinstated in the same position in which he was earlier standing. He further

referred Gujarat State Board Transport Corporation V/s D.V. Chauhan, 2006 (2) GLH 64 Full Bench Guj., wherein the

Gujarat High Court has held that the Labour Court or Industrial Tribunal while examining the legality of orders of

penalty other than discharge or dismissal, mere mentioning of Section 11 (a) would not rendered the order of the Tribunal

bad. He further referred State Bank of Bikaner V/s Nemichand Nalwaya, 2011 LLR 634 SC, wherein the apex court has

held that in the matter of disciplinary proceedings, the Court cannot act as an appellant Court to re-assess the evidence

produced in the domestic enquiry. Besides, it also cannot interfere with the ground that any other view is possible on the

basis of material available on record. As and when the punishment has been imposed after holding a disciplinary

proceedings/enquiry, Courts have restricted powers and has a scope to interfere only when the findings were perverse or

based on no evidence or in being violation of the principle of natural justice or statutory regulations. He further referred

Janatha Bazar (South Kanara Central Co-operative Wholesale Stores Limited) V/s Secretary, Sahakari Noukarara

Sangha, 2004 (4) LLN 571 SC, wherein the apex court has held that an employee who was removed from service for a

proved charge of breach of trust and mis-appropriation of money, the High Court and the Labour Court was unjustified to

reinstate him with 25% back wages on the ground that Court has no right or justification to say that the mis-appropriate

amount was small.

7.

It is also noteworthy that the apex Court has repeatedly held that if the legality of the departmental proceedings has

not been challenged then the Tribunal or Court has no locus to stand as an Appellate Court for modifying the punishment

awarded for a proven charge. Thus the Issue No. ii is decided accordingly. No relief can be granted.

8.

Thus the prayer sought by the second party workman has no force and liable to be rejected. The reference is

dismissed and disposed of with the observation that the action taken by the management of the first party, Bank of India,

New Cloth Market Branch, Ahmedabad, in removing the workman H.V. Vyas from service is legal and just.

9.

The award is passed accordingly.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 30 vxLr] 2018

dk-vk- 1337-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj cSad vkWiQ

cM+kSnk ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn (xqtjkr) ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 827@2004) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

30-08-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&12011@197@2003&vkbZvkj (ch&II)º

jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

5412

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 30th August, 2018

S.O. 1337.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 827/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of

Bank of Baroda and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 30.08.2018.

[No. L-12011/197/2003-IR (B-II)]

RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 14th August, 2018

Reference: (CGITA) No. 827/2004

The Manager,

Bank of Baroda,

Head Office, Mandvi,

Baroda (Gujarat)

…First Party

V/s

The President,

RashtriyaMazdoor Union,

Aram Building, Poolbari Naka, Salatwada,

Baroda (Gujarat) - 390001

…Second Party

For the First Party

:

Shri V.K. Mashar

For the Second Party

:

None

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-12011/197/2003–

IR(B-II) dated 28.11.2003 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in

respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management ofBank of Baroda through the Manager, Bank of Baroda, Jhagadia

Branch, Bharuch and others in terminating the services of Shri DineshkumarShantilalVesava is legal, proper and

justified? If not, what relief the workman Shri Dineshkumar Shantilal Vasava is entitled to and from which date

and what other directions are necessary in the matter?”

1.

The reference dates back to 28.11.2003 and received on 22.12.2003 from Ministry of Labour and Employment,

New Delhi for adjudication and passing the award.

2.

After issuing notice to the parties, the second party submitted the statement of claim Ex. 4 on 23.03.2004 and the

first party submitted the written statement Ex. 6 on 21.10.2004. Since then the second party has been absent and has not

been leading evidence despite giving dozens of opportunities.

3.

Thus it appears that the second partyis not willing to prosecute the case.

4.

Therefore, the reference is disposed of in the absence of the evidence of the second party workman with the

observation as under: “the action of the management of Bank of Baroda through the Manager, Bank of Baroda, Jhagadia

Branch, Bharuch and others in terminating the services of Shri Dineshkumar Shantilal Vesava is legal, proper and

justified.”

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940

5413

ubZ fnYyh] 30 vxLr] 2018

dk-vk- 1338-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj dkanyk iksVZ

VªLV ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn (xqtjkr) ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 25@2015) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

30-08-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&37011@05@2015&vkbZvkj (ch&II)º

jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 30th August, 2018

S.O. 1338.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 25/2015) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Kandla Port

Trust and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 30.08.2018.

[No. L-37011/05/2015-IR (B-II)]

RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 30th July, 2018

Reference: (CGITA) No. 25/2015

The Chairman,

Kandla Port Trust,

Administrative Building, P.B. No. 50,

Gandhidham (Gujarat) - 370201

…First Party

V/s

The General Secretary,

Transport and Dock Workers’ Union,

21, Yogesh Building, Plot No. 586, 12-C,

Gandhidham (Gujarat) - 370201

…Second Party

For the First Party

:

Shri K.V. Gadhia

For the Second Party

:

Shri N.H. Rathod

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-37011/05/2015–

IR(B-II) dated 24.03.2015 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in

respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of Kandla Port Trust in not removing the discrepancy in the matter of

date of birth of Shri Abhu Hasam, RP Workers 2/SM is just and fair? If not, to what relief is the employee

concerned is entitled?”

1.

The reference dates back to 24.03.2015 and received on 13.04.2015 from Ministry of Labour and Employment,

New Delhi for adjudication.

2.

In response to the notice issued to the parties by the Tribunal, the second party submitted the statement of claim

Ex. 6 on 22.08.2017 alleging that the second party workman hereinafter referred to as “workman” was working with the

first party Kandla Dock Labour Board (KDLB) later notified as Kandla Port Trust since 24.01.2007 as RP Worker 2/SM.

5414

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

He enquired into the office of the first party regarding his date of birth in the official record which was told to be

06.05.1958 while his actual date of birth is 26.02.1961 as per his school leaving certificate, therefore, he moved an

representation in the first party Kandla Port Trust to change his date of birth as stated above which was denied to be

changed by Kandla Port Trust. Therefore, he has prayed for change of date of birth to be recorded as 26.02.1961 in his

service record.

3.

The first party Kandla Port Trust, hereinafter referred to as “KPT” submitted the written statement Ex. 7 on

14.02.2018 stating that the reference is bad in law, time barred and the Tribunal has no jurisdiction to entertain the

reference, therefore, the reference is liable to be rejected. It is further submitted that the second party is not a workman as

defined under Section 2 (s) of the Industrial Disputes Act. The second party has to prove that he was working as RP

Worker with the Kandla Dock Labour Board which later merged into the first party KPT on 24.01.2007. The second

party has also to prove that he enquired from the official record that his date of birth was recorded as 06.05.1958. The

first party vide memorandum no. ADMB/KDLB/1311/1041 dated 13.05.1985 instructed the second party to produce the

documentary evidence regarding his date of birth but the second party workman categorically stated that he does not have

any evidence to support his date of birth and requested to take into consideration the same age as assessed by the Medical

Officer, KPT during his medical examination. Accordingly, the age of second party workman was considered as 29 years

as on 06.05.1987 as per the report of the Medical Officer having Report No. MH/GN/1102/1103/3207. It is also

noteworthy that the present reference has filed in the year 2015 after 28 years and has not explained as to why he has

taken action after such a long delay. Thus the reference is liable to be rejected. The first party vide list Ex. 8 submitted

the zerox copy of aforesaid memorandum, declaration in support of documentary evidence given by the second party

dated 14.05.1987 and certificate of fitness given by the Medical officer dated 05.05.1987.

4.

On the basis of the pleadings, the following issues arise:

I.

Whether the action of the management of Kandla Port Trust in not removing the discrepancy in the matter of

date of birth of Shri Abhu Hasam, RP Workers 2/SM is just and fair?

II.

To what relief, if any, the employee concerned is entitled?

5.

Issue No. I and II: Both the issues are interrelated, therefore, are to be decided together. The second party

workman Abhu Hasam submitted the affidavit Ex. 9 reiterating the averments made in the statement of claim Ex. 6. In

his cross-examination, he has stated that he joined the Kandla Dock Labour Board in the year 1987 which was merged in

Kandla Port Trust in the year 2007 and he has submitted his proof of date of birth while joining the services. He further

stated that he further asked by the Kandla Dock Labour Board on 13.05.1985 to file proof of his date of birth, the same

has been filed by him. He admitted that the document filed by the first party vide list Ex. 8/2 bears his signature which is

the declaration in support of documentary evidence given by the second party dated 14.05.1987. He further stated that he

don’t remember as to whether he was referred to Medical Authorities for ascertaining his age. Kandla Port Trust used to

issue him pay slips but he does not know the pay slips issued bearing date of birth. He made representation before the

authorities of Kandla Port Trust for change in his date of birth but he does not know the date of filing of representation.

The second party submitted his written arguments vide list Ex. 10.

6.

I heard and perused the written arguments of the second party and as well as of the first party. The second party in

his written argument Ex. 10 has referred Titagarh Jute Factory Company Ltd. V/s Sriram Tiwari, 1979 ILLJ 495 Cal.,

wherein it has been observed as under:

“2. When the dispute in question is an Industrial Dispute, the jurisdiction of Civil Court is bared and that the

Court below, therefore, has no jurisdiction to try the present suit. In support of this contention, relevance on

the decision in Premier Automobiles Ltd. V/s Kamalakar Shantaram has been made. In that case the

following principles have been laid down for ascertaining whether the jurisdiction of the Civil Court is barred

or not:

i.

If the dispute is not an Industrial Dispute nor does it relate to the enforcement of any other right under

the Act, remedy lies only in the Civil Court;

ii.

If the dispute is an Industrial Dispute arising out of a right or liability under the general or common law

and not under the Act, the jurisdiction of the Civil Court is alternative, leaving it to the election of the

suitor concerned to choose his remedy for the relief which is competent to be granted in a particular

remedy;

iii.

If the Industrial Dispute relates to the enforcement of a right or an obligation created under the Act,

then the only remedy available to the suit or is to get an adjudication under the Act;

iv.

If the right which is sought to be enforced is a right created under the Act, such as, Chapter VA then

the remedy for its enforcement is either Section 33 C or the raising of an Industrial Dispute, as the case

may be.”

“13. The present dispute as has already been found is an Industrial Dispute. Further, having regard to the nature of

the dispute it may very well be said that the dispute arises out of right or liability under the general and

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940

5415

common law and not under the Act. In the present case, as already stated, the contention of the plaintiff-

opposite party is that he was born on 20.08.1922 and did not as such attain the age of 58 years on 01.08.1977.

In other words, according to him, he would attain the age of 58 years on 20.08.1980. That precisely is the

plaintiff’s case even though he has challenged the applicability of the Clause 13 (c) of the standing orders of

the factory. He has not made out any specific case that he was not to retire on attaining the age of 58 years.

Further it is his case that there is no basis for holding that he was born on 01.08.1919 and accordingly he

could not be required to retire on 01.08.1977. The plaint, therefore, primarily raises the dispute as to whether

the plaintiff was born on 20.08.1922 or 01.08.1919. This is a dispute which may very well be raised before

the Civil Court as much as even though the dispute may be in the nature of an Industrial Dispute there is no

specific provision in the Act barring the jurisdiction of the Civil Court to decide a dispute of the kind raised

in this case. In that view of the matter, it ought to be held that the present suit is maintainable in a Civil

Court.”

“14. Further, the following material observations of the Supreme Court in Premier Automobiles V/s Kamalakar

Shantaram A.I.R. 1975 S.C. 2283 (supra) would also show that the Civil Court’s jurisdiction to entertain a

suit like the present one is not ousted. The relevant observation is as follows:

It would thus be seen that through the intervention of the appropriate Government, of course not directly,

very extensive machinery has been provided for settlement and adjudication of Industrial Disputes. But since

an individual aggrieved cannot approach the Tribunal or the Labour Court-directly for the redress of his

grievance without the intervention of the Government, it is legitimate to take the view that the remedy

provided under the Act is not such as to completely oust the jurisdiction of the Civil Court for trial of

Industrial Disputes. If the dispute is not an Industrial Dispute within the meaning of Section 2 (k) or within

the meaning of Section 2 A of the Act, it is obvious that there is no provision for adjudication of such

disputes under the Act. Civil Courts will be the proper forum. But where the Industrial Dispute is for the

purpose of enforcing any right, obligation or liability under the general law or the common law and not a

right, obligation or liability created under the Act, alternative forums are there giving an election of the suitor

to choose his remedy of either moving the machinery under the Act or to approach the Civil Court. It is plain

that he cannot have both. He has to choose the one or the other.”

7.

The second party further relied on United Bank of India V/s ram Raj Goala (dated 13.09.1979) and The workmen

through The Secretary, Bihar Jasnta Khan Mazdoor Sangh V/s Employer in relation to the management of Sijua Area of

M/s Bharat Coking Coal Limited (LPA No. 249 of 2013) wherein the apex courts has held similar views as stated in

Para 7.

8.

The second party further relied on Shah Nawaz V/s State of Uttar Pradesh and another, (2011) 13 SCC 751,

wherein the apex court has observed that medical opinion from Medical Board should be sought only when matriculation

certificate or school certificate or any birth certificate issued by a corporation or by any Panchayat or Municipality is not

available. He has further relied on Shicaji Malviya V/s Central Bank of India and others 1990 (3) UPLBEC 1652,

wherein the apex court has held as under: “In support of his contention that the High School Certificate is the only

document on which reliability is to be placed for recording the date of birth and no other document can at all be looked

into. If there is any dispute or discrepancy, in that event, the benefit must go to the petitioner.”

9.

The second party further argued that the first party KPT has not leaded any oral evidence to prove contention raised

in the written statement, further no rules or regulations regarding correction of date of birth has placed on record to prove

their contention and only contenting that the employee has made request after a lapse of 28 years, does not invalidate the

reference which is referred by the Government of India for adjudication. It is not fag-end of service. It is to be noted out

that the concerned employee has illegally retired from service meaning thereby, the employee has made an application

sufficient time prior to his so called retirement date. Therefore, the contentions raised by the first party are not proved by

the first party and the same are also contrary to the records.

10.

The first party has referred the Government of India Order, Department of Personnel and Training, O.M.

No. 19017/2/92 Estt. (A) dated 19.05.1993 and dated 16.12.2014 in which the provisions regarding date of birth and its

subsequent alteration which can be made in the Government of India are laid down. The aforesaid office memorandum is

produced as under:

I.

Declaration of Date of Birth: - Every new entrant to Government service should declare his date of birth by

the Christian era at the time of initial appointment with documentary evidence, viz., Matriculation

Certificate, Municipal Birth Certificate.

In the absence of such proof, he may declare approximate age or year or month and year of birth; assumed

date of birth will be arrived at as under:

i.

If the approximate age only is declared, the number of years representing the age declared to be

deducted and the assumed date arrived at.

5416

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ii.

If the year of birth only is declared, assumed date will be 1st July of the year.

iii.

If the month and the year are declared, assumed date will be 16th of that month of the year.

II.

Entry of Date of Birth in Service Records:- The actual date or assumed date of birth determined as above

will be recorded in the Service Book or other Service Records. Once entered, it cannot be altered, without

prior order of Head of Department, except in the case of a clerical error.

III.

Subsequent alteration of Date of Birth:- An alteration of date of birth can be made, with the sanction of a

Ministry/Department or the C. & A. G. in the case of IAAD or an Administrator of a Union Territory, if –

a.

An employee makes a request in this regard within 5 years of his entry into Government Service;

b.

It is clearly established that a genuine bona fide mistake had occurred; and

c.

The date of birth so altered would not make him ineligible to appear in any School or University or

UPSC examination in which he had appeared or for entry into Government service on the date on

which he first appeared at such examination or on the date of entry into Government service.

IV.

Belated claims for alteration in Date of Birth to be rejected:- Government policy regarding rejection of

belated claim for alteration in date of birth is reinforced by the Apex Court judgements in two cases. It will

not be appropriate to consider any request for alteration in date of birth if the conditions stipulated in Para 3

above are not strictly fulfilled.

11.

The Gujarat High Court in Sanjivani Hospital V/s Surat Labour Union, 2016 (1) CLR 1065 has held that the

provisions of the Limitation Act, 1963 do not apply to a reference of an Industrial Disputes but the Tribunal or Labour

Court has to keep in mind that the delay in raising the dispute by the workman must be such as to appear is a live dispute.

The court relied on judgements which are reproduced as under:

“5.5. This Court has considered the reasons recorded by the Labour Court. The Labour Court has recorded that the

delay should not be considered against the workman. The Labour Court has committed error at this stage. In

this regard, reference needs to be made to the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the case of

Assistant Engineer, Rajasthan State Agriculture Marketing Board and Sub-Division Kota V/s Mohan Lal

reported in 2013 III CLR 305 SC : (2013) 14 SCC 543. Para 19 of the said decision reads as under:

“19. We are clearly of the view that though the Limitation Act, 1963 is not applicable to the reference made under

the Industrial Disputes Act but delay in raising industrial dispute is definitely an important circumstance

which the Labour Court must keep in view at the time of exercise of discretion irrespective of whether or not

such objection has been raised by the other side. The legal position laid down by this Court in Gitam Singh

that before exercising its judicial discretion, the Labour Court has to keep in view all relevant factors

including the mode and manner of appointment, length of service, the ground on which termination has been

set aside and the delay in raising industrial dispute before grant of relief in an industrial dispute, must be

invariable followed.”

5.6. Reference can also be made to the subsequent decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in case of

Prabhakar V/s Joint Director Sericulture Department reported in JT 2015 (9) SC 83. Para 26 of thereof reads

as under:

“26. The aforesaid case law depicts the following:

a.

XXXXX

b.

XXXXX

c.

XXXXX

d.

Whether dispute is alive or it has become stale/non-existent at the time when the workman approaches

the appropriate Government is an aspect which would depend upon the facts and circumstances of each

case and there cannot be any hard and fast rule regarding the time for making the order of reference.

5.7. In view of the above proposition of law and the facts noted above, this Court finds that the reasoning adopted

by the Labour Court is unsustainable since the case of the workman himself was to the effect that he ought to

have been continued in service till 05.07.2007 and he raised this dispute in the year 2011. In view of this

delay on the part of the workman, the dispute ceased to be a live dispute when it was raised. No relief could

have been granted to the workman. The impugned award, therefore, needs to be quashed and set aside.”

The court after considering the aforesaid judgements has held that the delay of 4 years on the part of the

workman ceases the Industrial Disputes as live.”

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940

5417

12.

Though the second party has argued that the date of birth is also an Industrial Disputes, therefore, this tribunal has

very much jurisdiction to give the award.

13.

I do not agree with the arguments of the second party because he entered into the service in the year 1987 and has

not explained as to when he came to know his date of birth as 06.05.1958, thus raising the dispute after a lapse of

28 years when he was going to retire and at present, he is retired, the dispute cannot be said to be live. Secondly, he has

concealed the evidence of his date of birth till his retirement, therefore, for a monetary gain, his statement cannot be

believed. Raising the dispute after 8 years reflects his mala-fide for a monetary gain. Thirdly, as per the Government of

India Orders, he would have raised this dispute at the most in the year 2012. But he has not submitted any evidence

which may prove that he moved the representation to KPT in the year 2012. Fourthly, when there is a dispute regarding

date of birth, only the Civil Court has the jurisdiction to declare the changes in date of birth which have a long procedure

and same has not been followed. Thus the second party has failed to prove both the issues.

14.

Thus the reference has no force and decided as under: “the action of the management of Kandla Port Trust in not

removing the discrepancy in the matter of date of birth of Shri Abhu Hasam, RP Workers 2/SM is just and fair.”

15.

No relief can be granted. The award is passed accordingly.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 30 vxLr] 2018

dk-vk- 1339-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj dkanyk iksVZ

VªLV ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn (xqtjkr) ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 51@2015) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

30-08-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&37011@07@2015&vkbZvkj (ch&II)º

jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 30th August, 2018

S.O. 1339.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 51/2015) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Kandla Port

Trust and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 30.08.2018.

[No. L-37011/07/2015-IR (B-II)]

RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 30th July, 2018

Reference: (CGITA) No. 51/2015

The Chairman,

Kandla Port Trust,

Administrative Building, P.B. No. 50,

Gandhidham (Gujarat) - 370201

…First Party

V/s

The General Secretary,

Transport and Dock Workers’ Union,

F/3, Aadinath Arcade, Plot No. 586, 12-C,

Gandhidham (Gujarat) - 370201

…Second Party

5418

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

For the First Party

:

Shri K.V. Gadhia

For the Second Party

:

Shri N.H. Rathod

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-37011/07/2015–

IR(B-II) dated 22/28.05.2015 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Central Government Industrial Tribunal,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of Kandla Port Trust in not removing the discrepancy in the matter of

date of birth of Shri Satyanarayan, RP Workers 28/SM is justified and legal? If not so, to what relief the

employee concerned is entitled?”

1.

The reference dates back to 22/28.05.2015 and received on 15.06.2015 from Ministry of Labour and Employment,

New Delhi for adjudication.

2.

In response to the notice issued to the parties by the Tribunal, the second party submitted the statement of claim

Ex. 7 on 28.11.2016 alleging that the second party workman hereinafter referred to as “workman” was working with the

first party Kandla Dock Labour Board (KDLB) later notified as Kandla Port Trust since 24.01.2007 as RP Worker

28/SM. He enquired into the office of the first party regarding his date of birth in the official record which was told to be

19.11.1957 while his actual date of birth is 05.10.1960 as per his school leaving certificate, therefore, he moved an

representation in the first party Kandla Port Trust to change his date of birth as stated above which was denied to be

changed by Kandla Port Trust. Therefore, he has prayed for change of date of birth to be recorded as 05.10.1960 in his

service record.

3.

The first party Kandla Port Trust, hereinafter referred to as “KPT” submitted the written statement Ex. 8 on

21.08.2017 stating that the reference is bad in law, time barred and the Tribunal has no jurisdiction to entertain the

reference, therefore, the reference is liable to be rejected. It is further submitted that the second party is not a workman as

defined under Section 2 (s) of the Industrial Disputes Act. The second party has to prove that he was working as RP

Worker 28/SM with the Kandla Dock Labour Board which later merged into the first party KPT on 24.01.2007. The

second party has also to prove that he enquired from the official record that his date of birth was recorded as 19.11.1957.

The second party in his statement of claim Ex. 7 stated his age as 28 years on 19.11.1985, therefore, his date of birth was

taken as 19.11.1957 on the basis of his age. It is also noteworthy that the present reference has filed in the year 2015 after

30 years and has not explained as to why he has taken action after such a long delay. Considering his date of birth as

19.11.1957, he was due to retire in the year 2017. Thus the reference is liable to be rejected.

4.

On the basis of the pleadings, the following issues arise:

I.

Whether the action of the management of Kandla Port Trust in not removing the discrepancy in the matter of

date of birth of Shri Satyanarayan, RP Workers 28/SM is justified and legal?

II.

To what relief, if any, the employee concerned is entitled?

5.

Issue No. I and II: Both the issues are interrelated, therefore, are to be decided together. The second party

Satyanarayan submitted his affidavit Ex. 9 reiterating the averments made in the statement of claim Ex. 7 along with his

school leaving certificate showing his date of birth as 05.10.1960 and the Identification Card of KPT showing his date of

birth as 19.11.1957. Both the documents are zerox copies, though cannot be read under the Evidence Act but as both

admitted, therefore, these documents can be read.

6.

Later the workman submitted the additional affidavit Ex. 11 clarifying that as per his school leaving certificate, his

date of birth is 05.10.1960 and not 19.11.1957 as recorded in the service record. In his cross-examination, he has stated

that he joined Kandla Dock Labour Board in the year 1984. The first party has filed the documents vide list Ex. 10

showing his age in his application as 28 years on 18.11.1985 and in the service record, his date of birth is 19.11.1957.

7.

I heard and perused the written arguments of the second party and as well as of the first party. The second party in

his written argument has referred Titagarh Jute Factory Company Ltd. V/s Sriram Tiwari, 1979 ILLJ 495 Cal., wherein it

has been observed as under:

“2. When the dispute in question is an Industrial Dispute, the jurisdiction of Civil Court is bared and that the

Court below, therefore, has no jurisdiction to try the present suit. In support of this contention, relevance on

the decision in Premier Automobiles Ltd. V/s Kamalakar Shantaram has been made. In that case the

following principles have been laid down for ascertaining whether the jurisdiction of the Civil Court is barred

or not:

i.

If the dispute is not an Industrial Dispute nor does it relate to the enforcement of any other right under

the Act, remedy lies only in the Civil Court;

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940

5419

ii.

If the dispute is an Industrial Dispute arising out of a right or liability under the general or common law

and not under the Act, the jurisdiction of the Civil Court is alternative, leaving it to the election of the

suitor concerned to choose his remedy for the relief which is competent to be granted in a particular

remedy;

iii.

If the Industrial Dispute relates to the enforcement of a right or an obligation created under the Act,

then the only remedy available to the suit or is to get an adjudication under the Act;

iv.

If the right which is sought to be enforced is a right created under the Act, such as, Chapter VA then

the remedy for its enforcement is either Section 33 C or the raising of an Industrial Dispute, as the case

may be.”

“13. The present dispute as has already been found is an Industrial Dispute. Further, having regard to the nature of

the dispute it may very well be said that the dispute arises out of right or liability under the general and

common law and not under the Act. In the present case, as already stated, the contention of the plaintiff-

opposite party is that he was born on 20.08.1922 and did not as such attain the age of 58 years on 01.08.1977.

In other words, according to him, he would attain the age of 58 years on 20.08.1980. That precisely is the

plaintiff’s case even though he has challenged the applicability of the Clause 13 (c) of the standing orders of

the factory. He has not made out any specific case that he was not to retire on attaining the age of 58 years.

Further it is his case that there is no basis for holding that he was born on 01.08.1919 and accordingly he

could not be required to retire on 01.08.1977. The plaint, therefore, primarily raises the dispute as to whether

the plaintiff was born on 20.08.1922 or 01.08.1919. This is a dispute which may very well be raised before

the Civil Court as much as even though the dispute may be in the nature of an Industrial Dispute there is no

specific provision in the Act barring the jurisdiction of the Civil Court to decide a dispute of the kind raised

in this case. In that view of the matter, it ought to be held that the present suit is maintainable in a Civil

Court.”

“14. Further, the following material observations of the Supreme Court in Premier Automobiles V/s Kamalakar

Shantaram A.I.R. 1975 S.C. 2283 (supra) would also show that the Civil Court’s jurisdiction to entertain a

suit like the present one is not ousted. The relevant observation is as follows:

It would thus be seen that through the intervention of the appropriate Government, of course not directly,

very extensive machinery has been provided for settlement and adjudication of Industrial Disputes. But since

an individual aggrieved cannot approach the Tribunal or the Labour Court-directly for the redress of his

grievance without the intervention of the Government, it is legitimate to take the view that the remedy

provided under the Act is not such as to completely oust the jurisdiction of the Civil Court for trial of

Industrial Disputes. If the dispute is not an Industrial Dispute within the meaning of Section 2 (k) or within

the meaning of Section 2 A of the Act, it is obvious that there is no provision for adjudication of such

disputes under the Act. Civil Courts will be the proper forum. But where the Industrial Dispute is for the

purpose of enforcing any right, obligation or liability under the general law or the common law and not a

right, obligation or liability created under the Act, alternative forums are there giving an election of the suitor

to choose his remedy of either moving the machinery under the Act or to approach the Civil Court. It is plain

that he cannot have both. He has to choose the one or the other.”

8.

The second party further relied on United Bank of India V/s Ram Raj Goala (dated 13.09.1979) and The workmen

through The Secretary, Bihar Jasnta Khan Mazdoor Sangh V/s Employer in relation to the management of Sijua Area of

M/s Bharat Coking Coal Limited (LPA No. 249 of 2013) wherein the apex courts has held similar views as stated in

Para 7.

9.

The second party further relied on Shah Nawaz V/s State of Uttar Pradesh and another, (2011) 13 SCC 751,

wherein the apex court has observed that medical opinion from Medical Board should be sought only when matriculation

certificate or school certificate or any birth certificate issued by a corporation or by any Panchayat or Municipality is not

available. He has further relied on Shicaji Malviya V/s Central Bank of India and others 1990 (3) UPLBEC 1652,

wherein the apex court has held as under: “In support of his contention that the High School Certificate is the only

document on which reliability is to be placed for recording the date of birth and no other document can at all be looked

into. If there is any dispute or discrepancy, in that event, the benefit must go to the petitioner.”

10.

The second party further argued that the first party KPT has not leaded any oral evidence to prove contention raised

in the written statement, further no rules or regulations regarding correction of date of birth has placed on record to prove

their contention and only contenting that the employee has made request after a lapse of 30 years, does not invalidate the

reference which is referred by the Government of India for adjudication. It is not fag-end of service. It is to be noted out

that the concerned employee has illegally retired from service w.e.f. 30.11.2017 meaning thereby, the employee has

made an application sufficient time prior to his so called retirement date. Therefore, the contentions raised by the first

party are not proved by the first party and the same are also contrary to the records.

5420

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

11.

The first party has referred the Government of India Order, Department of Personnel and Training, O.M. No.

19017/2/92 Estt. (A) dated 19.05.1993 and dated 16.12.2014 in which the provisions regarding date of birth and its

subsequent alteration which can be made in the Government of India are laid down. The aforesaid office memorandum is

produced as under:

I.

Declaration of Date of Birth: - Every new entrant to Government service should declare his date of birth by

the Christian era at the time of initial appointment with documentary evidence, viz., Matriculation

Certificate, Municipal Birth Certificate.

In the absence of such proof, he may declare approximate age or year or month and year of birth; assumed

date of birth will be arrived at as under:

i.

If the approximate age only is declared, the number of years representing the age declared to be

deducted and the assumed date arrived at.

ii.

If the year of birth only is declared, assumed date will be 1st July of the year.

iii.

If the month and the year are declared, assumed date will be 16th of that month of the year.

II.

Entry of Date of Birth in Service Records:- The actual date or assumed date of birth determined as above

will be recorded in the Service Book or other Service Records. Once entered, it cannot be altered, without

prior order of Head of Department, except in the case of a clerical error.

III.

Subsequent alteration of Date of Birth:- An alteration of date of birth can be made, with the sanction of a

Ministry/Department or the C. & A. G. in the case of IAAD or an Administrator of a Union Territory, if –

a.

An employee makes a request in this regard within 5 years of his entry into Government Service;

b.

It is clearly established that a genuine bona fide mistake had occurred; and

c.

The date of birth so altered would not make him ineligible to appear in any School or University or

UPSC examination in which he had appeared or for entry into Government service on the date on

which he first appeared at such examination or on the date of entry into Government service.

IV.

Belated claims for alteration in Date of Birth to be rejected:- Government policy regarding rejection of

belated claim for alteration in date of birth is reinforced by the Apex Court judgements in two cases. It will

not be appropriate to consider any request for alteration in date of birth if the conditions stipulated in Para 3

above are not strictly fulfilled.

12.

The Gujarat High Court in Sanjivani Hospital V/s Surat Labour Union, 2016 (1) CLR 1065 has held that the

provisions of the Limitation Act, 1963 do not apply to a reference of an Industrial Disputes but the Tribunal or Labour

Court has to keep in mind that the delay in raising the dispute by the workman must be such as to appear is a live dispute.

The court relied on judgements which are reproduced as under:

“5.5. This Court has considered the reasons recorded by the Labour Court. The Labour Court has recorded that the

delay should not be considered against the workman. The Labour Court has committed error at this stage. In this

regard, reference needs to be made to the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Assistant

Engineer, Rajasthan State Agriculture Marketing Board and Sub-Division Kota V/s Mohan Lal reported in 2013 III

CLR 305 SC : (2013) 14 SCC 543. Para 19 of the said decision reads as under:

“19. We are clearly of the view that though the Limitation Act, 1963 is not applicable to the reference made

under the Industrial Disputes Act but delay in raising industrial dispute is definitely an important

circumstance which the Labour Court must keep in view at the time of exercise of discretion irrespective of

whether or not such objection has been raised by the other side. The legal position laid down by this Court in

Gitam Singh that before exercising its judicial discretion, the Labour Court has to keep in view all relevant

factors including the mode and manner of appointment, length of service, the ground on which termination

has been set aside and the delay in raising industrial dispute before grant of relief in an industrial dispute,

must be invariable followed.”

5.6. Reference can also be made to the subsequent decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in case of

Prabhakar V/s Joint Director Sericulture Department reported in JT 2015 (9) SC 83. Para 26 of thereof reads as

under:

“26. The aforesaid case law depicts the following:

a.

XXXXX

b.

XXXXX

c.

XXXXX

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940

5421

d.

Whether dispute is alive or it has become stale/non-existent at the time when the workman

approaches the appropriate Government is an aspect which would depend upon the facts and

circumstances of each case and there cannot be any hard and fast rule regarding the time for

making the order of reference.

5.7. In view of the above proposition of law and the facts noted above, this Court finds that the reasoning adopted

by the Labour Court is unsustainable since the case of the workman himself was to the effect that he ought to have

been continued in service till 05.07.2007 and he raised this dispute in the year 2011. In view of this delay on the

part of the workman, the dispute ceased to be a live dispute when it was raised. No relief could have been granted

to the workman. The impugned award, therefore, needs to be quashed and set aside.”

The court after considering the aforesaid judgements has held that the delay of 4 years on the part of the workman

ceases the Industrial Disputes as live.”

13.

Though the second party has argued that the date of birth is also an Industrial Disputes, therefore, this tribunal has

very much jurisdiction to give the award.

14.

I do not agree with the arguments of the second party because he entered into the service in the year 1985 and has

not explained as to when he came to know his date of birth as 19.11.1957, thus raising the dispute after a lapse of 30

years when he was going to retire and at present, he is retired, the dispute cannot be said to be live. Secondly, he has

concealed the evidence of his date of birth till his retirement, therefore, for a monetary gain, his statement cannot be

believed. Thirdly, he has filed the Identification Card of KPT which shows his date of birth as 19.11.1957 but he has not

revealed when this Identification Card was issued. I can presume that the Identification Card would have been issued

when the Kandla Dock Labour Board was merged into Kandla Port Trust on 24.01.2007. Raising the dispute after 8 years

reflects his mala-fide for a monetary gain. Fourthly, as per the Government of India Orders, he would have raised this

dispute at the most in the year 2012. But he has not submitted any evidence which may prove that he moved the

representation to KPT in the year 2012. Fifthly, when there is a dispute regarding date of birth, only the Civil Court has

the jurisdiction to declare the changes in date of birth which have a long procedure and same has not been followed. Thus

the second party has failed to prove both the issues.

15.

Thus the reference has no force and decided as under: “the action of the management of Kandla Port Trust in not

removing the discrepancy in the matter of date of birth of Shri Satyanarayan, RP Workers 28/SM is justified and legal.”

16.

No relief can be granted. The award is passed accordingly.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 30 vxLr] 2018

dk-vk- 1340-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj dkanyk iksVZ

VªLV ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn (xqtjkr) ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 78@2005) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

30-08-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&37011@1@2004&vkbZvkj (ch&II)º

jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 30th August, 2018

S.O. 1340.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 78/2005) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Kandla Port

Trust and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 30.08.2018.

[No. L-37011/1/2004-IR (B-II)]

RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

5422

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Ahmedabad,

Dated 13th August, 2018

Reference: (CGITA) No. 78/2005

The Chairman,

Kandla Port Trust,

Administrative Office, P.B. No. 50,

Gandhidham, Kutch (Gujarat) - 370201

…First Party

V/s

The General Secretary,

Transport and Dock Workers’ Union,

Room No. 21, Yogesh Building,

Ward No. 12-C, Plot No. 586,

Gandhidham, Kutch (Gujarat) - 370201

…Second Party

For the First Party

:

Shri K.V. Gadhia

For the Second Party

:

Shri N.H. Rathod

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-37011/1/2004–

IR(B-II) dated 21.06.2004 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in

respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of Kandla Port Trust, Gandhidham in not regularising the services of

Shri Khetsi Ratila, Daily Rated Plumber is legal and justified? If not, what relief the workman concerned is

entitled to?”

1.

The reference dates back to 21.06.2004 and received on 22.09.2005 from Ministry of Labour and Employment,

New Delhi for adjudication and passing the award.

2.

After issuing notice to the parties, the second party submitted the statement of claim Ex. 6 on 17.04.2009 and the

first party submitted the written statement Ex. 13 on 02.11.2015.

3.

The second party workman in his statement of claim Ex. 6 has alleged that KhetsiRatila was appointed as

appointed as Daily Rated Plumber by the first party Kandla Port Trust on 05.06.1995 in its Civil Engineering Department

where he worked on the said assignment till 09.10.2005. The workman made number of requests to the first party for

regularising his service as he has been working since last several years continuously on a vacant permanent post but the

said request was not considered by the first party favourably despite the fact that he worked for more than 240 days in

number of preceding calendar years. Therefore, the second party union The General Secretary, Transport & Dock

Workers Union, Room No. 21, Yogesh Building, Ward 12 C, Plot No. 586, Gandhidham, Kutch, raised an industrial

dispute before the Conciliation Officer but the matter could not been resolved. Due of failure of the conciliation, the

Conciliation Officer referred the matter to Government of India. The Government of India send the present reference to

this Tribunal for adjudication. The workman on the basis of the averments made in the statement of claim prayed for

regularisation of service with Rs.10000/- as legal expenses.

4.

The first party Kandla Port Trust vide his written statement Ex. 13 denying the claim of the workman as stated in

the statement of claim submitted that the workman was not appointed as per the recruitment rules of the Kandla Port

Trust. The reference is time barred, bad in law and prayer made in the statement of claim is beyond the terms of

reference. Therefore, the reference is liable to be dismissed. It is further submitted that the apex court has held that no

workman can be regularised without following the procedure laid down under Article 14, 16 and 309 of the Constitution

of India. Therefore, the reference is liable to be decided against the workman being the prayer beyond the scope of

reference.

5.

During the course of proceedings, the workman died on 09.10.2005, therefore, on moving application Ex. 12 by the

legal heirs of the deceased workman, the legal heirs the wife of the deceased workman namely Bhavnaben Khetsi Ratila,

son Deepak Khetsi Ratila and daughter Bhumika Khetsi Ratila were substituted in place of the deceased workman.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940

5423

6.

On the basis of the pleadings, the following issues arise:

I.

Whether the action of the management of Kandla Port Trust, Gandhidham in not regularising the services of

Shri Khetsi Ratila, Daily Rated Plumber is legal and justified?

II.

To what relief, if any, the concerned employee is entitled?

7.

Issue No. I and II: Both the issues are interrelated, therefore, are to be decided together. The burden of proof of

these issues was lying on the second party workman. The wife of the deceased workman Bhavnaben Khetsi Ratila

submitted her affidavit Ex. 14 to prove the case reiterating the averments made in the statement of claim. The first party

did not lead any evidence. During the course of argument, Advocate Shri M.K. Patel/ M/s K.V. Gadhia Associates, for

the first party orally stated that all the dues to the tune of Rs.23015/- (Rupees Twenty Three Thousand Fifteen)

admissible to the second party workman at the time of his death shall be paid by the first party. As the second party

workman has died, therefore, no question of regularisation arises. The advocate for the second party Shri Nirdosh H.

Rathod, has agreed for the proposal of the advocate of the first party Shri M.K. Patel paying of Rs.23015/- to the legal

heirs of the deceased workman. Therefore, no finding is required on both the issues. The reference is disposed of

accordingly.

8.

The first party Kandla Port Trust shall pay the aforesaid amount as early as possible to the legal heirs of the

deceased workman Khetsi Ratila from the date of publication of the award.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 30 vxLr] 2018

dk-vk- 1341-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj ikjknhi iksVZ

VªLV ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] Hkqous'oj ds iapkV felysfu;l dsl (lanHkZ la- 25@2017) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 30-08-

2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&39025@01@2017&vkbZvkj (ch&II)º

jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 30th August, 2018

S.O. 1341.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. Misc. Case No. 25/2017) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Bhubaneswar as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of

Paradip Port Trust and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 30.08.2018.

[No. L-39025/01/2017-IR (B-II)]

RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, BHUBANESWAR

Present:

Shri B.C. Rath,

Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-cum-Labour

Court, Bhubaneswar

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE MISC. CASE NO. 25/2017

(Filed under Section 33 (1)(A) of the Industrial Disputes Act)

Date of Passing Order – 18th April, 2018

Between:

The General Secretary,

Paradip Port Workers’ Union,

At./Po. Paradip, Dist. Jagatsinghpur,

Odisha – 754 142.

…Applicant-Union

5424

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(And)

The Chairman,

Paradeep Port Trust, At./Po. Paradeep,

Dist. Jagatsinghpur, Odisha – 754 142

…Opp. Party

Appearances:

M/s. Sanjat Das, Advocate

…

For the Applicant-Union

M/s. G. Pujari, Advocate

...

For the Opp. Party

AWARD

This award is directed against an application under section 33-A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (herein after

referred to as “The Act”) preferred by the General Secretary, Paradip Port Trust Workers Union.

2.

The case of the applicant-Union, in short, is that the appropriate government has referred a dispute between the

parties for its adjudication vide notification dated 18.4.2016 which is pending for disposal in this Tribunal vide I.D. Case

No. 25/2016. The schedule of the reference is 1. “Whether the demand of the Union to fill up of 5% direct recruitment

including accumulated backlog vacancies amongst the compassionate aspirants since 2001 in the cadre of Class-II & IV

employees by the management of Paradip Port Trust is legal and/or justified. If not so, what relief the workmen are

entitled to? 2. Whether the demand of the Union to regularize the services of all compassionate appointees/aspirants of

the deceased employees engaged through different contractors of the management is tenable and justified? If not so,

what relief the workmen are entitled to?” When such a dispute is pending for adjudication, the Opp. Party-Management

made newspaper advertisements inviting applications from willing candidates to fill-up certain vacancies in different

categories in its establishment. It is the claim of the applicant-Union that such action of the Management during

pendency of the dispute vide I.D. Case No. 25/2016 amounts to an unfair labour practice as enumerated in Chapter VB of

the Act and the same contravenes the provisions of Section 33(1) of the Act. The initiation of the recruitment process

would change the condition of service of the workmen, who are the aspirants for an appointment under compassionate

scheme. Any attempt on the part of the Opp. Party-Management in filling up the vacancies would deprive the legitimate

claim of the legal heirs of the deceased workmen to be appointed on compassionate ground and as such the Opp. Party-

Management shall be restrained from going ahead with the recruitment process till disposal/adjudication of the dispute

raised vide I.D. Case No. 25/2016.

3.

The Opp. Party-Management has resisted the application on a contention that the same is not maintainable as it is

not filed by the aggrieved workman or espoused by the Union-applicant being authorized by such aggrieved workman.

An application under section 33-A can only be filed in case of violation of condition of service of such employee during

the pendency of an industrial dispute in which the applicant is the concerned employee and the violation must have some

relevancy to the dispute pending for adjudication. It is the stand of the Opp. Party-Management that the applicant on

whose behalf the petition under section 33-A has been moved by the Union is not the workman of the Opp. Party-

Management, as they are aspirant for a job under the Opp. Party-Management under a compassionate scheme and as

such, question does not arise violation of service condition of such person. The alleged action of the Management does

not also constitute any contravention as contemplated under the provisions of Section 33 of the Act. Thus, the Opp.

Party-Management has forcefully submitted for dismissal of the application on account of the same being devoid of any

merit as well as not maintainable in the eye of law.

4.

The parties have not adduced any sort of evidence and advanced their arguments in support of their pleadings made

in their statements.

5.

Keeping in view the pleadings and submissions advanced by the parties the points for consideration are (i) whether

the present application espoused through the 2nd party-Union is maintainable in the eye of law; (ii) whether the action of

the Management in taking recruitment process to fill-up the different categories of vacancies during the pendency of the

reference No. I.D. 25/2016 is a violation of condition of service as enumerated in Section 33 of the Act and (iii) to what

relief the applicant is entitled to, if there was a contravention of the provisions of Section 33 of the Act.

6.

It is not disputed that in the event of a reference made by the Central Government by exercising its authority under

sub section 2-A of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, a dispute with the schedule mentioned earlier is

pending for adjudication in the Tribunal. Admittedly, the Opp. Party has issued an advertisement annexed to the

application under section 33-A of the Act during pendency of such dispute. Further-more, the present application is

espoused through the Union and there is no authorization on behalf of any aspirant appointees to present the application

under section 33-A of the Act. A bare perusal of the provisions of Section 33-A clearly reveals that the Section is

attracted when the following condition precedents are satisfied. (i) There should have been a contravention by the

management, of the provisions of Section 33 of the Act, (ii) The aforesaid contravention should have been during the

pendency of the proceedings before labour court, industrial tribunal etc. as the case may be; (iii) the complainant should

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940

5425

have been aggrieved by the contravention; and (iv) the application should have been made to the authority before whom

the case is pending. Further, the Section provides – “where an employer contravenes the provisions of Section 33 during

pendency of the proceedings (before a Conciliation Officer, Board, and Arbitrator, Labour Court, Tribunal or National

Tribunal) any employee aggrieved by such contravention, may make a complaint in writing (in the prescribed

manner.....” Hence, the right to complain against the contravention of Section 33 has been conferred on the employee

aggrieved by such contravention. As per the settled principle enunciated in the case of National Power Supply

Corporation Limited –versus – State of Assam (1963) II LLJ 10 such aggrieved employee has only the right to make an

application under section 33-A of the Act. A registered trade Union, of which such aggrieved employee is a member, has

no right to make such an application unless it has been authorized to do so by the aggrieved person. Coming to the case

at hand no authorization from the persons aggrieved by the action of the Management is filed and as such doubt can be

entertained towards maintainability of the application on account of the same not being preferred by the aggrieved

employee or on his authorization.

7.

Coming to the issue whether the action of the Management in taking recruitment process amounts to any

contravention as contemplated under section 33 of the Act. A mere reading of Section 33 clearly indicates that the

contravention must be related to change of service condition. The alleged action of the Management is not covered by the

conditions of service enlisted in the fourth schedule for which notice is to be given under section 9-A of the Act.

Similarly the action cannot be termed as unfair labour practice in view of the description of the actions enlisted in the

fifth schedule termed as unfair labour practice. As per the requirements of Section 33-A the basic question that falls to be

considered by this Tribunal whether there has been a contravention by the Opp. Party-Management of the provisions of

Section 33 and it is only in case it is found that there has been a contravention then the Tribunal has the authority to

adjudicate the dispute raised in the complaint preferred under Section 33-A of the Act. Before giving any relief to an

aggrieved employee under this provision it has to be determined whether the Opp. Party-Management’s action fell within

one of the blanket prohibition of Section 33. If the dispute pending adjudication has nothing to do with the alteration in

condition of service complained off and if the alternation is not to the prejudice of the workman, the application under

Section 33-A is wholly incompetent. In the case at hand there is no serious dispute that the persons alleged to have been

aggrieved by the action of the Management are aspirants for appointment under compassionate scheme and as such they

cannot be termed as employee of the Management. When their claim for compassionate appointment is yet to be acceded

to, question does not arise to treat them as aggrieved employee. Their claims to be appointed on compassionate ground

are yet to be decided. Hence, at this stage they cannot be said workmen/employee of the Opp. Party-Management and as

such no scope is available to hold them aggrieved employee. In the above facts and circumstances, the alleged action of

the Management cannot be counted a contravention as contemplated under section 33 of the Act. That apart, law is also

well settled that every contravention of Section 33 does not fall within the scope of Section 33-A and the mere fact that a

reference is pending, does not by itself entitle an employee to invoke Section 33-A of the Act.

8.

For the reasons mentioned above, the Misc. Case under section 33-A is devoid of any merit and accordingly the

application is rejected. The award is to be notified as per the provisions of the Act.

Dictated & Corrected by me.

B. C. RATH, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 30 vxLr] 2018

dk-vk- 1342-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj ,e@,l

fgekpy xzkeh.k cSad ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky; la- 2] paMhx<+ ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 977@2005) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

30-08-2018 dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&12011@7@95&vkbZvkj (ch&I)º

ch- ,l- fc"V] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 30th August, 2018

S.O. 1342.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 977/2005) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court No. 2, Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s.

Himachal Gramin Bank and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 30.08.2018.

[No. L-12011/7/95-IR (B-I)]

B. S. BISHT, Section Officer

5426

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH

ID No. 977/2005

Himchal Gramin Bank Karamchari Sangh,

47/9, Bangla Mohalla,

Mandi (HP)

Through its General Secretary

…Workmen/Claimants

Versus

M/s Himachal Gramin Bank,

H.O. Mandi,

Himachal Pradesh

…Management/ Respondent

AWARD

In the present case, matter was referred to Central Government Industrial Tribunal, Chandigarh vide letter No.L-

12011/7/95/IR(B) dated 19.08.1997 under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(in short the Act) for adjudication of an industrial dispute, terms of which are as under:—

‘Whether the action of management of Himachal Gramin Bank, Head Office,Mandi ( (HP) in not regularizing

the services of 108 messenger for the period of their continuous employment in the Bank and not paying them

salary of a regular messenger for the period of their service prior to regularization is legal and justified. If not to

what relief the workmen are entitled to and from which date ?

2.

Both parties were put to notice and 108 Workmen namely Devi Saran and others filed statement of claim through

General Secretary of the Himachal Gramin Bank Karamchari Sangh. As per the averments made in the claim petition,

the workmen were appointed as Messengers during the period from 19-11-87 to 12/6/1996 as detailed in Annexure-A of

the claim petition, at different places at Himachal Pradesh and were required to work for full day as regular employees

but were paid a fix amount of Rs.50 to Rs.500/- from time to time. They were treated as daily rated workman and their

duties were to open the bank one hour before its start and to remain in the bank till its closing; carrying of ledger/dak

etc.from one table to another, to clean the bank counters, chairs,tables etc. assisting the customers in filling the vouchers,

stitching of vouchers and maintain old records. The workmen through their union served upon the Management a

demand notice dated 17./10/94 in respect of their demands for removal of pay anomalies; regularization and uniform

transfer policy. Due to regular demand of the employees of the bank situated all over India, the Govt. of India vide its

letter dated 8/10/94 issued instructions to RBI to create posts of Messengers on regular basis and pursuant thereto, the

Chairman of the Management Bank issued a circular dated 19/10/1994 to regularize the services of the Messengers

working in different places in Himachal Pradesh. It is alleged that the Management with malafide intention did not

regularize the services of the Messengers/workmen in the year 1994 rather their services were regularized in the year

1987, whereas in other Banks in the country the Messengers were regularized with effect from the date of their actual

appointment with the concerned bank. The workmen filed a writ petition before Hon’ble Supreme Court on 16/9/82,

1985 and 1989 regarding equal pay and service conditions of Messengers and the Apex Court directed the Govt. to

constitute a Tribunal & referred the case of the applicants regarding equal pay with their counterpart working with other

nationalized bank and service conditions of Messengers. The Govt. of India constituted a National Industrial Tribunal

having its Headquarter at Hyderabad. The said Tribunal gave an Award dated 30/4/1990 that the services of all the so

called Messengers be regularized with effect from the date of their actual appointment and they be also entitled to regular

pay scale, allowances and other benefits. Since then the workmen through their Union are regularly demanding the

implementation of the Award but no action has been taken by the Management, whereas Jaipur Nagaur, Anchalink Bank

have regularized the services of the messengers from the date of their actual appointment. Hence, the prayer has been

made for declaring the action of the Management to be illegal, wrongful and unfair labour practice and that the workmen

whose details are given in Annexur-A be ordered to be regularized from the date of their appointment, with continuity of

service and that the workmen be awarded regular pay sale w.e.f. 1/9/1987 as per NIT Award.

3.

Management has resisted the claim of the Workman and filed written reply, taking preliminary objections that the

present claim is barred under law of limitation as the NIT Award was passed on 30/4/1990 and that the workmen were

paid wages according to their terms and conditions of engagement. The workmen can not claim regularization and pay

scale at par with Himachal Govt.employees. On merits it is stated that just and genuine demands of the workmen were

accepted . Since the Management has not framed any policy regarding regularization of the workmen, they are not

entitled to the relief claimed by them. Prayer has been made for dismissal of claim petition.

4.

Rejoinder was filed on behalf of the workmen/claimants, whereby the case as set up in the claim petition has been

reiterated and allegations made in the written statement have been denied.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940

5427

5.

The Claimants in support of their case examined Shri Dharam Chand as W.W.1 and tendered his affidavits

Ex.WW1/1 and Ex.WW1/2 and relied on the documents filed alongwith his affidavit Ex.WW1/2. He testified that the

persons whose names find mentioned in the List Mark-A are the employees f the Management working in different

places and they are performing full time job for the Management. The workmen had made representations about the

duties performed by them, to the Management and copy of the same has been filed on record as Annexure P-11 In cross

examination while denying the suggestion that all the 108 workmen in reference had been employed as part time

sweepers, the witness volunteered that the workmen had been employed as messengers but he failed to show any

appointment letter. He denied the suggestion that workmen used to work only for 2 hours a day as per requirement. He

clarified that the workmen were being paid wages as per circular Ex.P-21 of his affidavit. He showed his ignorance that

wages of workmen were revised vide circular Ex.M-3 and re-revised as per circular Ex.M-4 and Ex.M-5. He denied the

suggestion that the workmen did not make any representation to the Management about their wages before 1987 and that

is why no such representation has been filed on record. The witness was cross examined at length regarding constitution

of the Union and about membership of the workmen as also the authority of the witness to depose in the case but nothing

incriminating was brought on the record.

6.

On the other hand, the Management in order to rebut the case of the claimant examined one Shri Girija Shankar

Gaur (MW1), who retired as Chief Manager from the Head Office of the Management Bank on 30/9/2013. He filed his

affidavit Ex.M-3 whereby he stated that the casual/part time workers working in the Bank before the year 1990 used to

perform misc. work like fetching water, cleaning and dusting branch premises, fixture, furniture etc during the limited

period for which they were engaged as per direction of Head Office of the Bank as circulated from time to time.

According to him, such casual/part time workers were being paid wages according to the circulars viz. circular dated

4/6/1983, 15/9/83, 15/7/86 and 8/4/87. He never came across any case in the Bank where casual/ part time worker was

working for whole day. In cross examination, he deposed that he joined at Mandi and thereafter was transferred to

branch office Gaggal, where Chottu Ram was working as Safai Karamchari at that time Bank had issued circular P-21

and it was not the duty of Safai Karamchari to open the bank, to supply drinking water to the staff and to carry the dak.

He stated that the circulars which finds mentioned in his affidavit were brought to the notice of the employees but he did

not produce any record relating to those circulars. He did not remember whether bank had provided bicycle to the said

Safai Karamchari. He admitted that no timing hours were given to the workmen and no notice was served on the

workmen for changing the service conditions. He denied the suggestion that work was taken from Chhotu Ram for

7 hours (per day) but admitted that the bank did not employee any other Peon except the said Peon.

7.

From the pleadings and evidence adduced on record by the parties, it is manifest that 108 Nos. of workmen

(whose particulars are detailed in the list Mark-A) were engaged by the Management as Messengers at different bank

branches at Himachal Pradesh and they were performing misc. duties as per requirement. According to the

Management, they were working just as casual//part time workers. As such, it clearly establishes relationship of

employer-employee between the Management and claimant. In this regard, reference can be made to the decision in the

case of Devinder Singh Vs. Municipal Council, Sanaur, AIR 2011 Supreme Courtt 2532, wherein the Hon’ble Apex

Court while interpreting the provisions of Section 2(S) of the Act which deals with the definition of “workman” has

observed as under :—

“The source of employment, the quantum of recruitment, the terms & conditions of employment/ contract of

service, the quantum of wages/ pay and mode of payment are not at all relevant for deciding whether or not a

person is a workman within the meaning of Section 2(s) of the Act. The definition of workman also does not

make any distinction between full time and part time employee or a person appointed on contract basis. There

is nothing in the plain language of Section 2(s) from which it can be inferred that only person employed on

regular basis or a person employed for doing whole time job is a workman and the one employed on temporary,

part time or contract basis on fixed wages or as a casual employee or for doing duty for fixed hours is not a

workman.”

It is clear from the perusal of aforesaid observations that even if a person is engaged on temporary, part time or

contract basis or for doing any other kind of work and is duly paid wages for the said work, in that eventuality such a

person would be covered by the definition of “workman” as provided in Section 2(S) of the Act.

8.

As discussed above, in the case in hand engagement of the claimants as part time for doing intermittent nature of

work and/or for cleaning the bank premises is duly admitted by the Management as per its pleadings and evidence

adduced on record. The workmen have been serving the Management Bank since long. As such, this Tribunal has no

hesitation to hold that there exists relationship of Employer-employee between the Management and the claimants herein.

9.

It is worthwhile to mention here that after verification of bank records, certificate Ex.P-19 (colly.) were issued by

the Management Bank, showing that workmen like Chaman Lal, Amar Singh, Prem Singh, Balbir Chand, Umesh

Kumar and Dharam Singh were found to be working for the jobs assigned to them vis-à-vis maintenance of voucher

register, dak register, voucher stitching cover leaves, current-cum-old records register, security forms and cheques issues

register, cheques returned register, cash receipt & withdrawal voucher, D/L and Term Loan balance confirmation and

documents register, account opening forms of deposit accounts, office order register besides ledger sheet, mini deposit

5428

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

collections . In the face of certificate Ex.P-19 (colly.) and descriptions of job done by the workmen as shown therein,

the stand of the Management that the workmen were not working throughout the day, is belied inasmuch type and nature

of work required for maintenance and keeping of aforesaid records/registers is of regular & perennial one and the same is

done especially during working hours of the bank. The version of WW1 Dharamchand that the workmen perform

duties right from 9.30 a.m. in the morning and to the job of clearning, sweeping and other allied jobs before opening the

bank and further that, the workmen also perform regular duties during the course of day, such as assisting the customers

to fill up voucher of withdrawal and deposit etc., has gone unrebutted. Thus, the claim of the Management Bank that

workmen are just casual/part-time workers engaged by it, is untenable, inasmuch as the nomenclature of the workmen

though used as part time workers but they had been working for full time for discharging their duties with regards to

description of jobs assigned to them.

10.

Now the crucial question arises for consideration is whether the action of management in not regularizing the

services of 108 messenger for the period of their continuous employment in the Bank is legal and justified.

11.

It is undisputed fact that pursuant to the directions dated 1/9/1987 of Hon’ble Supreme Court in All India

Gramin Bank Workers Organization &another Vs,. UOI and others (Writ Petition Nos7149-50./82 and 132/84),

the Central Govt. vide notification dated 26/11/1987 constituted a National Industrial Tribunal for adjudication of the

dispute relating to parity of pay, salary, allowances and other benefits with the employees of Nationalized Banks in

corresponding or comparable posts. The National Industrial Tribunal (in short “NIT”) after having gone through the

records as well as evidence adduced before it, gave its Award dated 30/4/1990 (Ex.A-5). Relating to dispute as to

whether the part-time Sweepers-cum-Messengers are justified in demanding salary on par with the permanent

Messengers, NIT in para 4.410 of the Award held as under :—

“In view of the authoritative pronouncements of the Supreme Court, it must be held that the part-time sweepers-

cum-messengers who were employed on daily wages or on half of the salary or on some other proportion of the

salary of a regular messenger, will be entitled to their various claims such as equal pay and all other attendant

benefits as are admissible to regularly appointed full time messengers in the respective RRBs. That there was/is

no sanctioned post of a regular messenger in a branch or the Head office is absolutely irrelevant and immaterial

in view of the proved facts that the so called part time messengers, whether on daily wages or on some other

basis, were made to work full time by their respective managements. The Managements can not extract full

time work and even beyond the working hours from the so called part time messengers by merely showing them

in the acquittance rolls as part time employees paid on either daily wages, or some other basis, or o some

proportionate basis. Their service shall be regularized with effect from the date of their continuous

engagement. If deemed necessary, it will be open to the Government or the RRBs as the case may be, to

sanction the required number of posts to accommodate the writ petitioners and all those belonging to

their class.”

12.

Perusal of the record shows that a demand notice dated 17-10-1994 (Ex.P-11) was served by the workmen Union to

the Chairman, Himachal Gramin Bank for removal of pay anomalies as well as regularization of messengers in terms of

the Award passed by NIT. As per document Ex.P11 talks were held between the Management and Workmen’s Union

on 21/11/1994 and after deliberations number of demands of the Officers and other employees like conveyance

allowance of Officers, reimbursement of actual hospitalization charges, promotion from scale I to Scale II, provision of

Wall Clock and calculators in the branches were accepted. However, as regards demand of regularization of the

messengers from the date of their engagement in the bank, it was decided that necessary information will be collected

from the concerned branches. What it emerges is that even after the Award of NIT dated 30.4.1990, the Management

had not taken effective steps even for four years or so, for regularization of the workmen herein viz. messengers working

in different branches under their control and supervision. The list of those workmen/ messengers is Ex.P-1 wherein date

of their respective appointment, date of regularization and place of posting has been elaborated and the said list shall

form part of this Award. No explanation has come forward from the side of the Management as to why it did not take

steps for regularization of the workmen in terms of the Award of the NIT dated 10/4/1990. In terms of the Award, the

services of the workmen are bound to be regularized with effect from the date of their continuous officiations with the

Management Thus, the action of the Management Bank in not regularizing the services of 108 messenger for the period

of their continuous employment in the Bank is held to be illegal and unjustified. The Management Bank is under legal

obligation to regularize the services of the workmen from the date of their continuous officiations with the Management.

13.

During the course of arguments, learned A/R for the Management strenuously argued that in fact the workmen

were regularized in 1987 by the Management as per direction of Govt. of India and NABARD, i.e. much before NIT

Award passed in 1990. He submitted that the Management Bank had started process of regularization of part time/daily

wage messengers under the provisions of letter dated 18/12/1984 and 15 persons were found eligible as on 31/12/1984 as

per criteria laid down by the Govt. of India and in the year 1987 when relaxation of age & qualification was given, 59

more workmen were regularized and in subsequent years 1980- to 1991, 45 more workmen were regularized and thus,

in fact 104 messengers were regularized till 1991, whereas 4 messengers who were appointed on compassionate grounds

after death of their spouse/dependent were regularized from 1993 to 1996. It will be suffice to say that the Management

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940

5429

has not adduced on record any such evidence that the workmen (108 Nos.) have since been regularized, even prior or

after passing of NIT Award on 10/4/1990 in terms of the Award itself. Even assuming for the sake of arguments that the

workmen herein have since been regularized by the Management Bank, the question arises for consideration is as to

whether they have been regularized with effect from the date of their continuous officiation. The Management has not

filed on record any document to show that the workmen have been regularized from the respective date of their

continuous officiation, in terms of the Award of NIT passed on 10/4/1990, which is per-se binding on the Management

Bank. In the circumstances, it is held that action of the Management Bank in not regularizing the services of the

workmen/messengers from the respective date of their officiation in the Management Bank is illegal and unjustified,

inasmuch as in terms of the NIT Award, the services of the workmen are required to be regularized with effect from the

date of their continuous officiation.

14.

Now the residual question arises for consideration is as to what relief the workmen are entitled to. It is worthwhile

to mention here that the relief granted by the NIT Award are unequivocally contained in para 4.425 and 4.427 which for

ready reference are reproduced hereunder :—

“4.425 : What flows from my findings is that the Officers and other employees of RRBs will be entitled to claim

parity with the Officers and other employees of the Sponsor Banks in the matter of pay scales, allowances and

other benefits. What stems from this finding is the date from which effect should be given to the Award. I have

given my anxious consideration as to the date from which the Award should be given effect. The writ petitions

No.7149-50/82 and 132/84 were not filed at one and the same time. They were filed on different dates.

Petitioners in W.P. Nos.7149-50/82 claimed reliefs from the date of establishment of RRBs. Petitioners in W.P.

No.132/84 did not specify any date but in their claim statement filed before me, they have asked for effect being

given from the date of writ petition i.e. 16-9-1984. I think it would be proper, just and reasonable if I direct that

the Award shall be given effect from 1st day of September, 1987 the date on which the Supreme Court passed

the order directing the Central Government to constitute the Tribunal.

4.427. .Having regard to the above, in order to eliminate the anomalies and bring about uniformity in the pay

scales in all the RRBs at least to the extent of each State, I find that they will be entitled to all the allowances,

benefits which the State Government servants of comparable level and status are entitled to. They will,

therefore, be only entitled to claim the difference in allowances and other benefits, so as to bring about

uniformity with the State Government employees in all matters of pay scales, allowances, benefits etc., till

31st day of August, 1987 .

The aforesaid two paragraphs cover the relief relating to pay parity for the entire period with effect from the date of

regularization as envisaged under para 4.410. Both these paragraphs if read together makes it amply clear that the pay

parity of the workmen is to be regularized in terms of para 4.410 with effect from the date of their continuous officiation

with corresponding pay and emoluments paid to the such other employees of the Management Bank with effect from

1st day of September, 1987 and prior to that, the pay parity with the employees of RRBs is to be maintained with the

allowances, benefits which the State Govt. of comparable level and status are entitled to. To this view, I am fortified by

the decision of Hon’ble High Court of Rajasthan (at Jodhpur) in the case of Harudhar Kshetriya Gram Bank Vs. Mahavir

Singh and another (Civil Special Appeal (W) No. 70./2002 – decided on 21/4/2003.

15.

Hon’ble the Apex Court in the case of State of Punjab and others Vs. Jagjit Singh and others, 2017Lab.L.C. 427

while upholding the principle of “equal pay for equal work” even for temporary employees observed as under :—

“The principle of “equal pay for equal work” can be extended to temporary employees (differently described as

work-charged, daily wage, casual, adhoc, contractual and the like). It is fallacious to determine artificial

parameters to deny fruits of labour. An employee engaged for the same work, can not be paid less than another,

who performs the same duties and responsibilities. Certainly not, in a welfare State. Such an action besides

being demeaning, strikes at the very foundation of human dignity. Any one, who is compelled to work at a

lesser wage, does not do so voluntarily. He does so, to provide food and shelter to his family, at the cost of his

self respect and dignity, at the cost of his self worth, and at the cost of his integrity. For he knows, that his

dependents would suffer immensely, if he does not accept the lesser wage. Any act, of paying less wages, as

compared to others similarly situate, constitutes an act of exploitative enslavement, emerging out of a

domineering position. Undoubtedly, the action is oppressive, suppressive and coercive, as it compels

involuntary subjugation.”

16.

It is pertinent to mention here that the reference to National Industrial Tribunal had been made in regard to all the

employees of Gramin Bank throughout the country and therefore, all the Banks including the Management-Bank

were./are bound to implement the award in regard to their respective employees. In these circumstances, this Tribunal is

of the considered view that the workmen are also entitled to the relief which the NIT has awarded to the category of

employees in para 4.410 re-produced above. However, in terms of para 4.428, the NIT award has been given effect to

from the 1st day of September, 1987. As per list Ex.P-1, all the workmen/claimants herein joined service with the

Management Bank after 1/9/1987, to be more precise during the period between 19-11-87 to 12/6/1996. Therefore, the

5430

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Management Bank is directed to implement the Award and give all the necessary & consequential reliefs to the

claimants/workmen (including the legal heirs of deceased workmen in case of demise of any of the workmen, during the

proceedings) with effect from the date they joined service. The award is passed accordingly.

Date : 23.07.2018

AVTAR CHAND DOGRA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 30 vxLr] 2018

dk-vk- 1343-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj if'pe jsyos

ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k

,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 144@2013) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 30-08-2018 dks çkIr

gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&41011@29@2013&vkbZvkj (ch&I)º

ch- ,l- fc"V] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 30th August, 2018

S.O. 1343.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 144/2013) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Western

Railway and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 30.08.2018.

[No. L-41011/29/2013-IR (B-I)]

B. S. BISHT, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 09th August, 2018

Reference: (CGITA) No. 144/2013

The Sr. Divisional Engineer (Co-ordination),

Western Railway, Asarwa,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

…First Party

V/s

The Divisional Secretary,

Paschim Railway Karmachari Parishad,

28-B, Narayan Park,

Behind Chandkheda Railway Station,

Sabarmati,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 382470

…Second Party

For the First Party

:

Shri M.M. Solanki

For the Second Party

:

Shri R.S. Sisodiya (Union Representative)

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-41011/29/2013–

IR(B-I) dated 24.07.2013 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect

of the matter specified in the Schedule:

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940

5431

SCHEDULE

“Whether the demand of the Vice President, Paschim Railway Karmachari Parishad, Ahmedabad against the

Sr. Divisional Engineer (Co-ordination), Western Railway, Ahmedabad:

i.

To take back order of freeze of one year increment and to take wage order of downgrade of one stage for

two months against Shri Badiwel Kuppan, Jamadar;

ii.

To take back the punishment imposed against Shri Ram Naresh, Gangman;

iii.

To take posted Shri Sanjay Thakur and Shri Rajesh Kushwaha as Khalasi;

Are legal, fair and justified? If so, then to what relief the above workmen are entitled to?”

1.

The reference dates back to 24.07.2013 and received on 06.08.2013 from Ministry of Labour and Employment,

New Delhi for adjudication.

2.

Both the parties issued notice Ex. 2 to appear on 27.12.2013. In response to the notice, the second party union

submitted the statement of claim Ex. 4 on 27.12.2013. Shri Mangal Solanki submitted his vakalatpatra Ex. 3 on behalf of

the first party.

3.

The case was fixed for filing of written statement for the first party but today on 09.08.2018, Shri R.S. Sisodiya,

The Divisional Secretary, Paschim Railway Karmachari Parishad, 28-B, Narayan Park, Behind Chandkheda Railway

Station, Sabarmati, Ahmedabad, requested the Tribunal to withdraw the case.

4.

Thus the reference is disposed of as withdrawn.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 30 vxLr] 2018

dk-vk- 1344-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj if'peh

jsyos ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 05@2017) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 30-08-2018

dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&41011@17@2016&vkbZvkj (ch&I)º

ch- ,l- fc"V] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 30th August, 2018

S.O. 1344.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 05/2017) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Western Railway and

their workmen, received by the Central Government on 30.08.2018.

[No. L-41011/17/2016-IR (B-I)]

B. S. BISHT, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 10th August, 2018

Reference: (CGITA) No. 05/2017

1.

The Divisional Railway Manager,

Western Railway, Asarwa, Near Chamunda Bridge,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

5432

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2.

The President,

RMCC, Pratapnagar,

Baroda (Gujarat)

…First Parties

V/s

The President,

Akhil Bhartiya Karmachari Mahasangh,

28-B, Narayan Park,

Behind Chandkheda Railway Station,

Sabarmati,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 382470

…Second Party

For the First Party

:

Shri M.M. Makhija

For the Second Party

:

Shri R.S. Sisodiya (Union Representative)

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-41011/17/2016–IR(B-I)

dated 08.02.2017 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Central Government Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad

(Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the demand of the President, Akhil Bhartiya Karmachari Mahasangh, Ahmedabad against the

President, RMCC, Baroda to disburse the amount without any deduction to Shri Jitendra Labhshankar,

Benjamin and Manharbhai is legal, fair and justified? If so, then what relief the workmen, Shri Jitendra

Labhshankar, Benjamin and Manharbhai are entitled to?”

1.

The reference dates back to 08.02.2017 and received on 13.02.2017 from Ministry of Labour and Employment,

New Delhi for adjudication.

2.

All the parties issued notice Ex. 2 on 03.01.2018 to appear on 05.03.2018. In response to the notice, Shri M. M.

Makhija, submitted his vakalatpatra Ex. 5 on behalf of the first party no. 1.

3.

The case was fixed for filing of statement of claim for the second party but today on 10.08.2018, Shri R.S.

Sisodiya, The President, Akhil Bhartiya Karmachari Mahasangh, 28-B, Narayan Park, Behind Chandkheda

Railway Station, Sabarmati, Ahmedabad, requested the Tribunal to withdraw the case.

4.

Thus the reference is disposed of as withdrawn.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 30 vxLr] 2018

dk-vk-1345-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj if'peh jsyos

ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vfèkdj.k

,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 09@2017) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 30-08-2018 dks çkIr

gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&41011@13@2016&vkbZvkj (ch&I)º

ch- ,l- fc"V] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 30th August, 2018

S.O. 1345.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 09/2017) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Western Railway and

their workmen, received by the Central Government on 30.08.2018.

[No. L-41011/13/2016-IR (B-I)]

B. S. BISHT, Section Officer

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940

5433

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 10th August, 2018

Reference: (CGITA) No. 09/2017

The Divisional Railway Manager,

Western Railway,

Pratapnagar,

Baroda (Gujarat) - 390004

…First Party

V/s

The Dy. General Secretary,

Paschim Railway Karmachari Parishad,

28-B, Narayan Park,

Behind Chandkheda Railway Station,

Sabarmati,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 382470

…Second Party

For the First Party

:

Shri M.M. Makhija

For the Second Party

:

Shri R.S. Sisodiya (Union Representative)

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-41011/13/2016–

IR(B-I) dated 08.02.2017 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Central Government Industrial Tribunal,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the demand of the Dy. General Secretary, Paschim Railway Karmachari Parishad, Ahmedabad against

the Divisional Railway Manager, Western Railway, Baroda to give/allow family pension to Shri Budha Mohan,

Ex-Gangman is legal, fair and justified? If so, then what relief Shri Budha Mohan, Ex-Gangman is entitled to?”

1.

The reference dates back to 08.02.2017 and received on 08.03.2017 from Ministry of Labour and Employment,

New Delhi for adjudication.

2.

All the parties issued notice Ex. 2 on 03.01.2018 to appear on 05.03.2018. In response to the notice, Shri M. M.

Makhija, submitted his vakalatpatra Ex. 5 on behalf of the first party.

3.

The case was fixed for filing of statement of claim for the second party but today on 10.08.2018, Shri R.S.

Sisodiya, The Dy. General Secretary, Paschim Railway Karmachari Parishad, 28-B, Narayan Park, Behind Chandkheda

Railway Station, Sabarmati, Ahmedabad, requested the Tribunal to withdraw the case on the ground that the Case No.

08/2013 having the same matter is pending before this Tribunal.

4.

Thus the reference is disposed of as withdrawn.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 30 vxLr] 2018

dk-vk- 1346-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj Hkkjrh; LVsV

cSad ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 454@2004) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 30-08-2018

dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&12012@314@2001&vkbZvkj (ch&I)º

ch- ,l- fc"V] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

5434

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 30th August, 2018

S.O. 1346.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 454/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of

India and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 30.08.2018.

[No. L-12012/314/2001-IR (B-I)]

B. S. BISHT, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 07th August, 2018

Reference: (CGITA) No. 454/2004

1.

The Chief General Manager,

State Bank of India,

Local Head Office, Bhadra,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380001

2.

The Dy. General Manager,

State Bank of India,

Zonal Office, Ambawadi,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) - 380001

…First Parties

V/s

The Secretary,

Gujarat Rajya Ardgsarjaru Audhyogik Karmachar Sangh,

4, Deelex Apartments, 1st Floor, Vastrapur,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380007

…Second Party

For the First Party

:

Shri B.K. Oza

For the Second Party

:

Shri R.C. Pathak

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-12012/314/2001–

IR(B-I) dated 27.12.2001 referred the disute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect

of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of State Bank of India in not regularising the services of Shri

Sureshbhai B. Vaghela is justified? If not, what relief the concerned workman is entitled?”

1.

The reference dates back to 27.12.2001 and received on 04.01.2002 from Ministry of Labour and Employment,

New Delhi for adjudication.

2.

The second party submitted the statement of claim Ex. 5 on 09.09.2003 and the first party submitted the written

statement Ex. 6 on 24.12.2003. Thereafter, the second party union moved an application Ex. 10 on 27.09.2017 for

production of documents. The first party also filed the reply Ex. 11 with respect to the application for production of

documents Ex. 10 filed by the second party.

3.

It is noteworthy that this reference was moved for regularising the services of the second party workman while the

second party workman has already been dismissed from service. Concerning the dismissal, he raised the dispute before

the Assistant Labour Commissioner, Ahmedabad regarding the dismissal which was not referred by the Government of

India to this Tribunal. Thus a dismissed employee cannot claim his regularisation unless he adopts a step to get the

dismissal set aside. Same has not been done. Thus this reference has become in-fructuous.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940

5435

4.

Today on 07.08.2018, the advocate for the second party workman Shri R.C. Pathak requested for withdrawal of the

reference.

5.

Thus the reference is disposed of as withdrawn.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 30 vxLr] 2018

dk-vk- 1347-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj if'peh

jsyos ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 31@2017) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 30-08-2018

dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&41012@13@2016&vkbZvkj (ch&I)º

ch- ,l- fc"V] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 30th August, 2018

S.O. 1347.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 31/2017) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Western Railway and

their workmen, received by the Central Government on 30.08.2018.

[No. L-41012/13/2016-IR (B-I)]

B. S. BISHT, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 07th August, 2018

Reference: (CGITA) No. 31/2017

1.

The Sr. Divisional Railway Manager,

Western Railway,

Divisional Office, Asarwa, Chamunda Bridge,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

2.

The Manager,

Bank of India, Ramnagar, Sabarmati,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) - 380005

…First Party

V/s

The President,

Akhil Gujarat Karmachari Mahasangh,

28/B, Narayan Park, Behind Chandkheda Railway Station,

Sabarmati,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 382470

…Second Party

For the First Party

:

None

For the Second Party

:

Shri R.S. Sisodiya (Union Representative)

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-41012/13/2016–

IR(B-I) dated 26.04.2017 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Central Government Industrial Tribunal,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

5436

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of Sr. Divisional Finance Manager, Western Railway, Ahmedabad to

refix the family pension as per old PPO to Smt. Reshma W/o Late Anil Dutt Mishra and illegal recovery of

arrears from her family pension is legal, fair and justified? If so, then what relief Smt. Reshma is entitled to?”

1.

The reference dates back to 26.04.2017 and received on 04.05.2017 from Ministry of Labour and Employment,

New Delhi for adjudication.

2.

All the parties issued notice Ex. 2 to appear on 06.03.2018 but none responded from any of the parties.

3.

Shri R.S. Sisodiya, the President, Akhil Gujarat Karmachari Mahasangh,28/B, Narayan Park, Behind Chandkheda

Railway Station, Sabarmati, Ahmedabad, today on 07.08.2018 requested the Tribunal to withdraw the case.

4.

Thus the reference is disposed of as withdrawn.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 30 vxLr] 2018

dk-vk- 1348-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj Hkkjrh; LVsV

cSad ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 327@99) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 30-08-2018 dks

çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&12012@283@99&vkbZvkj (ch&I)º

ch- ,l- fc"V] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 30th August, 2018

S.O. 1348.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 327/99) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of India and

their workmen, received by the Central Government on 30.08.2018.

[No. L-12012/283/99-IR (B-I)]

B. S. BISHT, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/R/327/99

Shri Suresh,

S/o Chottelal Yadav,

18/3, Moti Tabela,

Indore (MP)

…Workman

Versus

Dy.General Manager,

State Bank of India,

Local Head Office,

Hamidia Road,

Bhopal (MP)

…Management

ORDER

Passed on this 24th day of April 2018

1.

As per letter dated 15-11-99 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is received.

The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section-10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.L-12012/283/99/IR(B-I).

The dispute under reference relates to:

“Whether the action of the management of State Bank of India, Indore, Indore in not regularizing and terminating

the services of Shri Suresh S/o Shri Chhotelal Yadav, Ex-Peon w.e.f. 30-10-97 is legal and justified. If not, to what

relief the workman is entitled to?”

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940

5437

2.

On perusal of record, it is seen that Ist party is not taking any steps from the year 2005 after filing of claim

statement. 2nd party management has already filed its Written Statement. The case is found lingering awaiting appearance

of the workman to file documents if any for hearing and on settlement of issues. The case cannot be allowed to linger for

an indefinite period. Hence it is just and proper to return the reference without any answer as Ist party workman fails to

present the dispute and it is difficult on part of the Tribunal to adjudicate the dispute without evidence of the Ist party.

Accordingly the dispute is disposed off.

3.

Let the copies of the order be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment as per rules.

B. C. RATH, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 30 vxLr] 2018

dk-vk- 1349-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj Hkkjrh; LVsV

cSad ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vfèkdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 132@2004) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 30-08-2018

dks çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&12012@44@98&vkbZvkj (ch&I)º

ch- ,l- fc"V] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 30th August, 2018

S.O. 1349.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 132/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of

India and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 30.08.2018.

[No. L-12012/44/98-IR (B-I)]

B. S. BISHT, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 13th August, 2018

Reference: (CGITA) No. 132/2004

The Manager,

State Bank of India,

Main Branch, Bhadra,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) - 380001

…First Party

V/s

Mr. P.C. Rajput,

P. No. 224/12, Pyarchand Punjabi Laxmishankar Bhavan,

Khokhra Road, Opp. Old Municipal Quarters,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) - 380001

…Second Party

For the First Party

:

Shri D.C. Gandhi Associates

For the Second Party

:

Shri B.B. Thesia

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-12012/44/98–

IR(B-I) dated 28.08.1998 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect

of the matter specified in the Schedule:

5438

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of State Bank of India in terminating the services of Shri Pyarchand C.

Rajput w.e.f. 31.01.1997 and not considering for regular employment is justified? If not, what relief the

concerned workman is entitled to?”

1.

The reference dates back to 28.08.1998 and received on 30.09.1999 from Ministry of Labour and Employment,

New Delhi for adjudication and passing the award.

2.

After issuing notice to the parties, the second party submitted the statement of claim Ex. 8 on 09.10.1998 and the

first party submitted the written statement Ex. 9 on 23.09.1999. Since then the second party has been absent and has not

been leading evidence despite giving dozens of opportunities.

3.

Today on 13.08.2018, the advocate for the second party, Shri B.B. Thesia states that the second party workman/his

client has not been in his contact since long.

4.

Thus it appears that the second party workman is not willing to prosecute the case.

5.

Therefore, the reference is disposed of in the absence of the evidence of the second party workman with the

observation as under: “the action of the management of State Bank of India in terminating the services of Shri Pyarchand

C. Rajput w.e.f. 31.01.1997 and not considering for regular employment is justified.”

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 31 vxLr] 2018

dk-vk- 1350.—deZpkjh jkT; chek vf/kfu;e 1948 ¼1948 dk 34½ dh /kkjk&1 dh mi /kkjk ¼3½ }kjk iznRr 'kfDr;ksa

dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] dsUnzh; ljdkj ,rn~}kjk 1 flrEcj] 2018 dks ml rkjh[k ds :i esa fu;r djrh gS] ftldks mDr

vf/kfu;e ds v/;k;&4 ¼44 o 45 /kkjk ds flok; tks igys ls izo`Rr gks pqdh gS½ v/;k;&5 vkSj 6 [/kkjk&76 dh mi /kkjk&¼1½

vkSj /kkjk&77] 78]79 vkSj 81 ds flok; tks igys gh izo`Rr dh tk pqdh gS] ds mica/k rfeyukMq jkT; ds fuEufyf[kr {ks=ksa

¼igys ls vf/klwfpr {ks=ksa ds vykok½ esa izo`Rr gksaxs] vFkkZr~ %&

Øe la-

ftyksa dk uke

1

fo#nquxj

2

fr#ok#j

[la- ,l&38013@04@2018&,l-,l-I]

larks"k dqekj flag] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 31st August, 2018

S.O. 1350.—In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-Section (3) of Section 1 of the Employees State

Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948), the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st September, 2018 as the date on

which the provisions of Chapter IV (except Section 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force) and Chapter-

V and VI [except Sub-Section (1) of Section 76 and Section 77,78,79 and 81 which have already been brought into force]

of the said Act shall come into force in the following Districts in the State of Tamil Nadu, in whole, in addition to the

already implemented areas in the district namely:-

Sl. No.

NAME OF THE DISTRICT

1

VIRUDHUNAGAR

2

THIRUVARUR

[No. S-38013/04/2018-S.S.I]

S. K. SINGH, Under Secy.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940

5439

ubZ fnYyh] 31 vxLr] 2018

dk-vk-1351-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vks ,u th lh

fyfeVsM ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 161@2004) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 27-08-2018 dks

çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&30012@60@1998&vkbZvkj (lh&I)º

,e- ds- flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 31st August, 2018

S.O. 1351.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad

(Ref. No. 161/2004) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of ONGC Ltd., and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 27.08.2018.

[No. L-30012/60/1998-IR (C-I)]

M. K. SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 06th August, 2018

Reference: (CGITA) No. 161/2004

1.

The Group General Manager (P),

ONGC Ltd., Avani Bhavan,

Chandkheda,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380005

2.

Shri Y.K. Patil,

Hotel Sugand,

Nr. Jognima Temple, Ramnagar, Sabarmati,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

…First Party

V/s

The General Secretary,

Gujarat Petroleum Employees Union,

434/46, Gandhi Vas, Gujarat Stadium Road,

Sabarmati,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380005

…Second Party

For the First Party

:

Shri K.V. Gadhia

For the Second Party

:

Kum. Santoshben

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-30012/60/98–

IR(C-I) dated 10.02.1999 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect

of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the canteen situated in the premises of Sabarmati Establishment of ONGC was statutory canteen and

the persons detailed in the list annexed with the reference, were working therein?”

and

5440

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

“Whether the demand of Gujarat Petroleum Employees Union that the persons working in the said canteen

ought to be treated as direct employees of ONGC is legal, just and proper? If so, then what relief, if any, the

employees concerned are entitled?”

1.

The reference dates back to 10.02.1999 and received on 18.02.1999 from Ministry of Labour and Employment,

New Delhi for adjudication.

2.

It is noteworthy that the present Reference (CGITA) No. 161/2004 was earlier registered as Reference (ITC) No.

47/1999 while pending the case in the Industrial Tribunal (Central), Ahmedabad. Later it was transferred to this Tribunal

where new number Reference (CGITA) No. 161/2004 was allotted.

3.

In response the notices issued to the parties, J.S. Parasar, General Secretary, Gujarat Petroleum Employees Union,

434/46, Gandhi Vas, Gujarat Stadium Road, Sabarmati, Ahmedabad, submitted the statement of claim Ex. 4 on

23.07.1999 alleging that the similar dispute was also raised in respect to the same canteen in a reference registered at

Reference (ITC) No. 10/1998 by the workmen. The present reference has been moved in respect of 9 employees detailed

as under:

S. No.

Name of Workman

Post Held

Date

of

appointment

Wages at the time of

termination

1

Sudhirbhai Govindrao Patel

Manager

cum

Supervisor

11.12.1989

Rs.2000/- per month

2

Sahilesh K. Parmar

Assistant Cook

11.12.1989

Rs.750/- per month

3

Ramesh B. Thakore

Service Boy

11.12.1989

Rs.750/- per month

4

Rajuji Meshram

Store Keeper

April, 1991

Rs.550/- per month

5

Arvind A. Vaghela

Service Boy

January, 1992

Rs.385/- per month

6

Gunvant GurudasMorshikhar

Service Boy

January, 1992

Rs.550/- per month

7

Mahesh M. Parmar

Utensil Cleaner

September, 1995

Rs.500/- per month

8

Manilal Revabhai Parmar

Assistant Cook

January, 1995

Rs.385/- per month

9

Mathurdas B. Parmar

Service Boy

January, 1991

Rs.385/- per month

Thus it appears that the earlier Reference (ITC) No. 10/1998 relates to 16 employees and the present reference

relates to aforesaid 9 employees. These employees alleged to have been engaged in a canteen running at Sabarmati

Premises of ONGC Ltd. where more than 1000 employees of ONGC were working and this canteen was running and

created for the employees exclusively working in the ONGC and it was statutory canteen under the Mines Act.

4.

It is further alleged that the said canteen was earlier run by ONGC Consumer Co-operative Society and since the

said society went into liquidation, therefore, the said canteen was handed over to a contractor named M/s. Y.K. Patil. It is

further alleged that the workmen who raised the dispute vide Reference (ITC) No. 10/1998 moved the High Court of

Gujarat vide SCA No. 127/1996. It is noteworthy that the workmen who moved the Gujarat High Court were inclusive of

the workmen in another Reference (ITC) No. 47/1999 (in present Reference (CGITA) No. 161/2004). The High Court in

the aforesaid SCA No. 127/1996 directed the Central Labour Commissioner to investigate and find out the names of the

workmen who had been working in the said canteen for more than 3 years. The Labour Enforcement Officer (Central)

investigated and submitted a report before the High Court of Gujarat, wherein the names of the workmen detailed in the

Reference (ITC) No. 47/1999 (present reference), were not included in the report but they were present at the time of

enquiry. It is further alleged that the services of all the employees mentioned in the present reference were terminated on

30.05.1996 without paying the retrenchment compensation or serving the notice by the ONGC or the contractor as the

case may be. It has been further alleged that the said canteen was part and parcel of the efficient working of the

employees of ONGC, the first party and the contract was for name sake. It has been further alleged that the workmen

were working under the direct control and supervision of the first party ONGC and they have been working for a long

time, therefore, the ONGC constituted a committee to supervise the work of the canteens for maintaining the quality of

the food items prepared in the canteen. The ONGC has also provided the facility of premises, furniture, water cooler and

refrigerator - de-freezer etc. besides cooking utensils, crockeries and all the instruments of cooking facilities for the

smooth running of the canteen. It has been also alleged that the canteen facility was obligatory even if the ONGC has not

explicitly undertaking to provide the canteen facility to its employees. Thus the second party union has prayed for

reinstatement of all the workmen concerning this reference with back wages with a continuity of service and other

benefits admissible to the regular employees of ONGC.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940

5441

5.

The first party The Group General Manager (P),ONGC Ltd., Avani Bhavan, Chandkheda, Ahmedabad, hereinafter

referred to as “ONGC” submitted the written statement Ex. 11 denying all the averments made in the statement of claim

submitted that the concerned workmen under the reference were not the workmen as defined under Section 2 (s) of the

Industrial Disputes Act. There was no master servant relationship between the ONGC and the alleged workmen under

this reference. There does not exist any industrial dispute as defined under Section 2 (k) of the Industrial Disputes Act.

The second party union was not having any locus-standii to represent the alleged workmen under the reference as per the

provisions of Section 6 (e) of the Trade Union Act as the second party union by virtue of its constitution, was not

authorised to represent persons employed in Hotels, Restaurants, Industries etc. It has also been submitted that these

persons were not engaged by the ONGC and at present, have not been working in the canteen. Therefore, they cannot be

said to be entitled for benefits of regular employees of ONGC. It has been further submitted that under the Factories Act

as well as under the Mines Act, the ONGC is not under obligation to maintain or run the canteen. The rule 72 of the

Mines (Central) Rules provides that the Chief Inspector of Mines is only authorised and also notified for establishment of

a canteen in any establishment related to the Mines. Therefore, unless such notification is not issued by the Chief

Inspector of Mines, it cannot be said or construed that ONGC was in the obligation to establish and run the canteen.

Therefore, the reference has no force and the concerned persons are not entitled for any relief.

6.

The second party union moved an application Ex. 14 to implead Shri Y.K. Patil, contractor of the canteen as first

party No. 2. The said application after hearing was allowed by the then Presiding Officer and Shri Y.K. Patil was

impleaded as first party No. 2. Thereafter, the second party union as directed by the Tribunal amended the statement of

claim accordingly. The copy of the statement of claim was also sent to the aforesaid contractor but despite receiving the

copy of statement of claim by registered post, the acknowledgement of post Ex. 21 is on record, the contractor/first party

No. 2 did not submit the written statement.

7.

The second party union moved an application Ex. 12 for production of documents detailed in the application.

Instead of pressing the said application, the second party union lead the oral evidence by way of submitting affidavits Ex.

22 and 25 of Shaileshkaushalbhai K. Parmar and Arvindkumar A. Vaghela respectively. Later, the union did not press the

aforesaid application Ex. 12.

8.

On the basis of the pleadings, the following issues arise:

I.

Whether the canteen situated in the premises of Sabarmati Establishment of ONGC was statutory canteen and

the persons detailed in the list annexed with the reference, were working therein?

II.

Whether the demand of Gujarat Petroleum Employees Union that the persons working in the said canteen

ought to be treated as direct employees of ONGC is legal, just and proper?

III.

To what relief, if any, the employees concerned are entitled?

9.

Issue Nos. I, II and III: All the issues are interrelated, therefore, are to be decided together. The burden of proof of

these issues was lying on the second party union. The witnesses examined Shaileshkaushalbhai K. Parmar and

Arvindkumar A. Vaghela in their affidavits Ex. 22 and 25 have reiterated the averments made in the statement of claim

reiterating that they were helping the Chef/Cook in the canteen and their last monthly wages were Rs.725/- per month.

They were terminated on 30.05.1996 without serving notice or paying notice pay or compensation. They tried to search

alternative job after termination but did not succeed. In their cross-examination, they have stated that they do not know

the contractor Y.K. Patil which was impleaded as party. They have also admitted that the ONGC did not give them any

appointment letter. They have also admitted that the contract of the contractor Y.K. Patil came to end on 30.05.1996 but

denied in their cross-examination that Y.K. Patil was having supervision control of the canteen and used to pay wages to

them. One of the witnesses Shaileshkaushalbhai K. Parmar admitted that the expenditures of his family have been

managed by him and his brother after termination. The witness Arvindkumar A. Vaghela in his cross-examination

admitted that Y.K. Patil was running the canteen. He used to pay the wages to all the canteen employees but he does not

know when the contract of the canteen was terminated.

10.

It is noteworthy that the list annexed with the reference has the details of 9 workmen but only 2 aforesaid witnesses

were examined. The second party union has also submitted a pursis that the persons at Serial Nos. 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8 and 9

have not been approaching the union since long and their addresses are not available with the union, therefore, they are

not pressing the reference on behalf of the aforesaid persons except Shaileshkaushalbhai K. Parmar and Arvindkumar A.

Vaghela.

11.

What can be inferred from the terms of the reference is that this Tribunal first has to decide the issue that whether

the Sabarmati Canteen was a statutory canteen under the Mines Act. The second party union in its statement of claim has

stated that the canteen was a statutory canteen under the Mines Act, situated and running in the premises belonging to

ONGC with the help and facility of its furniture, fixtures, utensils, kerosene burners, water containers, crockeries,

cutleries, refrigerators, water coolers and de-freezers etc. but the second party union has not submitted any oral and

documentary evidence to substantiate the fact that the canteen in question was a statutory canteen in the Mines Act. The

second party union has also not submitted the notification or instruction issued by any competent authority directing the

5442

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 8, 2018/BHADRA 17, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ONGC to run a canteen so may that it may be called as statutory canteen. It is also noteworthy that the ONGC was

governed by Mines Act and was not governed by the Factories Act. ONGC in his written statement and argument has

denied that the canteen in question was a statutory canteen and has also stated that the Chief Inspector of Mines never

issued instructions or notification to maintain the canteen in question for its employees. The Central Government under

Section 58 of the Mines Act has powers to frame rules. The rule 64 of the Mines Rules 1995 provides for issuing

notification by Chief Inspector of Mines directing the concerned establishment to maintain canteen for its employees. In

the present case, there is no such evidence, therefore, the Issue No. I is decided in the negative with a finding that the

canteen in question was not a statutory canteen.

12.

Since the issue No. I is answered in negative against the second party union, therefore, the tribunal did not go into

the second and third issues as the same come into play only if the first issue is answered in affirmative.

13.

However as stated above, out of 9 persons, only 2 persons entered into witness box and reference qua 7 persons,

vide Ex. 27, the union has not led any evidence as they are not in contact of the union since long and not interested to

proceed the matter. Regarding remaining 2 persons who have deposed before the tribunal, they are not entitled to get any

relief against the first party ONGC as they have admitted in their cross-examination that they were paid the wages by the

contractor Y.K. Patil and the contract of contractor Y.K. Patil ended w.e.f. 31.05.1996. Secondly, they have admitted in

their cross-examination that the ONGC has not given them any appointment letter; therefore, employer-employee

relationship does not exist between the ONGC and the remaining 2 persons. Also the ONGC has not appointed them and

the second party union failed to prove that the services of remaining 2 workmen have been terminated by the ONGC.

From the record, it is established that more than 20 years have passed from the date of alleged termination of the

workmen. Therefore, they are not entitled to get any relief against the ONGC including reinstatement and back wages.

From the pleadings, it is transpired that in SCA No. 127/1998 filed by the second party union, the Hon’ble High Court

has directed the Central Labour Commissioner to investigate into the matter. Accordingly, Labour Enforcement Officer

(Central) has conducted the enquiry and filed the report before the Hon’ble High Court wherein the names of the

concerned employees were not mentioned. The same also proves that they are not deployed by the ONGC nor they were

in job at the time of the visit of Labour Enforcement Officer (Central). Therefore, the concerned 2 workmen are not

entitled to be reinstatement. Thus as stated above, the concerned 2 workmen failed to prove that the Sabarmati canteen is

a statutory canteen and they were deployed by ONGC and paid salary by the ONGC. They are not entitled to get relief of

reinstatement and to be treated as direct employees of the ONGC. Moreover as per the settled law, when the concerned

workmen are not in job, they are not entitled to get status of direct employee of ONGC. The first party has relied upon

the judgements of Hon’ble Supreme Court reported in 2000 (2) CLR 241 and 2007 (3) CLR 690, wherein the apex court

has held that the workers working in the canteen which is not a statutory canteen, are not employees of the Principal

Employer. Moreover, the first party has also relied upon the judgement of Hon’ble Apex Court reported in 2014 (3) CLR

751, wherein the apex court has held that although there exists some degree of control and supervision on workers of

statutory canteen, the said workers are not entitled for regularisation. Thus considering the facts of the present case and

the ration laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, I come to the conclusion that the remaining 2 workmen are not

entitled to get the status of direct employees of ONGC.

14.

Thus the reference is finally disposed of as dismissed and no relief is granted.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 31 vxLr] 2018

dk-vk- 1352-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh èkkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ

chlhlh,y ds çcaèkra=k ds lac¼ fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqcaèk esa fu£n"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vfèkdj.k@Je U;k;ky; la- 2] /uckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 02@2012) dks çdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 27-08-2018 dks

çkIr gqvk FkkA

¹la- ,y&20012@55@2011&vkbZvkj (lh,e&I)º

,e- ds- flag] vuqHkkx vf/dkjh

New Delhi, the 31st August, 2018

S.O. 1352.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No, 2,

Dhanbad (Ref. No. 02 of 2012) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to

the management of M/s. BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 27.08.2018.

[No. L-20012/55/2011-IR (CM-I)]

M. K. SINGH, Section Officer

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % flrEcj 8] 2018@Hkkæ 17] 1940

5443

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO.2), AT DHANBAD

PRESENT : Shri P.K.Mishra, Presiding Officer

In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1) (d) of the I.D.Act., 1947

REFERENCE NO 02 OF 2012

PARTIES

:

The Vice President,

Rastriya Colliery Mazdoor Congress At: Vinod Nagar,

Chiragora, Distt: Dhanbad

Dhanbad. (Jharkhand).

Vs.

The General Manager,

E, J. Area of M/s. BCCL

PO: Bhowra, Distt: Dhanbad (Jharkhand)

Order No. -20012/55/2011-IR(CM-I) dt. 20.12.2011

APPEARANCES

:

On behalf of the workman/Union

:

Mr.S.C.Gaur, Ld. Union Rep.

On behalf of the Management

:

Mr.D.K.Verma, Ld. Advocate

State : Jharkhand

Industry : Coal

Dhanbad, the 9th Aug., 2018

AWARD

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Sec.10(1)(d) of

the I.D. Act.,1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No.

20012/55/2011-IR(CM-I) dt. 20.12.2011.

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the Management of Bhowra (S) Colliery of M/s. BCCL in dismissing Sh.Sakindra

Bhuia from the services of the Company vide order dated 28/31.07.2006 is justified? To what relief the

workman concerned is entitled to?”

2.

The instant case put up on date. Junior to Mr. D.K.Verma, Ld. Counsel for the Management appeared .So long the

Union concerned, its Representative Mr. S C. Gaur too, made his appearance before the Court moving with a petition

dt.07.06.2018 of the workman concerned citing his unwillingness to contest the case on merit. More so, it prima facie

reflects workman unwillingness to go in for final adjudication. These sumps up the stand, the Tribunal has been looking

on such cases over years. The status of case was fixed around filing documents resting an onus on the part of the O, P.

/Management since long back from 02.4.2014 .Ironically , there have been subsequently sufficient adjournments availed

of by both of the parties on different pretexts with no signs of action seems visible. The case deals with dismissal of the

workman under the Management of Bhowra (S) Colliery of M/s. BCCL seeking relief there under by challenging the

alleged action.

From perusal of the case record and materials of the facts , it stands clear that the workman/petitioner concerned

is no longer interested to get to the finality of the case through adjudication as reflected in his petition moved before

the Court by Union Representative on workman’s behalf. However proceedings have been abruptly come to a grinding

halt over filing of documents on the part of the Management since long back . `When move for passing a No Dispute

Award from the side of the workman himself, the Industrial Dispute under Reference has been no longer in existence.

As usual the Tribunal would not have been left with no choice but to close the case dropping the proceedings in the line

of the natural justice and sheer disinterestedness on the part of the workman as well. So the case is wrapped up as no

Industrial Dispute. Accordingly an Award of ‘No Dispute’ is passed.

P. K. MISHRA, Presiding Officer

Uploaded by Dte. of Printing at Government of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi-110064

and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi-110054.

ALOK KUMAR

Digitally signed

by ALOK KUMAR

Date: 2018.09.26

14:43:50 +05'30'