7000 GI/2018
(6595)
jftLVªh la- Mh- ,y- (,u) 04@0007@2003μ05
REGD. No. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05
izkf/dkj ls izdkf'kr
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
lkIrkfgd
WEEKLY
la- 49]
ubZ fnYyh] fnlEcj 9—fnlEcj 15] 2018] 'kfuokj@vxzgk;.k 18—vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
No. 49]
NEW DELHI, DECEMBER 9—DECEMBER 15, 2018, SATURDAY/AGRAHAYANA 18— AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
bl Hkkx esa fHkUu i`"B la[;k nh tkrh gS ftlls fd ;g i`Fkd ladyu ds :i esa j[kk tk lds
Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation
Hkkx II—[k.M 3—mi&[k.M (ii)
PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)
Hkkjr ljdkj ds ea=kky;ksa (j{kk ea=kky; dks NksM+dj) }kjk tkjh fd, x, lkafof/d vkns'k vkSj vf/lwpuk,a
Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India
(Other than the Ministry of Defence)
िवदेश मंतर्ालय
(सी.पी.वी. पर्भाग)
नई िदल् ली, 12 नवम् बर, 2018
का.आ. 1749.—राजनियक और कᲂसुलीय अिधकारी (शपथ एवं फीस) के अिधिनयम, 1948 (1948 का 41) की
धारा 2 के खंड(क) के अनुसरण मᱶ वैधािनक आदेश ।
एतद᳇ारा, केन् दर् सरकार भारत के उच् चायोग, बर्ूनेई दारुस् सलाम मᱶ शर्ी ल᭯ मी कांत चोपड़ा, सहायक अनुभाग
अिधकारी को िदनांक 12 नवम् बर, 2018 से सहायक कᲂसुलर अिधकािरयᲂ के तौर पर कᲂसुलर सेवाᲐ के िनवर्हन के िलए
पर्ािधकृत करती है ।
[सं. टी. 4330/1/2017]
पर्काश चन् द, िनदेशक (कᲂसुलर)
6596
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS
(CPV Division)
New Delhi, the 12th November, 2018
S.O. 1749.—Statutory Order in pursuance of the clause (a) of the Section 2 of Diplomatic and Consular Officers
(Oaths and fees) Act, 1948 (41 of 1948), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Laxmi Kant Chopra, Assistant
Section Officer, as Assistant Consular Officer in High Commission of India, Brunei Darussalam to perform the Consular
services with effect from 12 November, 2018.
[No. T. 4330/01/2017]
PRAKASH CHAND, Director (Consular)
कािमक, लोक िशकायत और पᱶशन मंतर्ालय
(कािमक और पर्िशक्षण िवभाग)
नई िदल्ली, 30 नवम् बर, 2018
का.आ. 1750.— केन् दर्ीय सरकार, एतारा दंड पर्िकर्या संिहता, 1973 (1974 का 2) की धारा 24 की उपधारा (8)
᳇ारा पर्दत् त शिक् तयᲂ का पर्योग करते हुए लातूर (महाराष् टर्) िस् थत सतर् न् यायालयᲂ मᱶ िदल् ली िवशेष पुिलस स् थापना
(सीबीआई) ᳇ारा संस् थािपत लातूर सतर् मामला सं. 78/2014/या आर सी 04 (एस)/2016)सीबीआई (एस सी-1/नई िदल्ली
(कल् पना िगरी हत् याकांड) से उत् पन् न होने वाले अन् य मामलᲂ मᱶ अिभयोजन का संचालन तथा उससे संब और उसी संव् यवहार
मᱶ, पर्सांिगक अन् य मामलᲂ मᱶ अपील/पुनरीक्षण का संचालन करने के िलए शर्ी िशवाजी पर्ह्लादराव चवन, अिधवक् ता को
उनकी िनयुिक् त की तारीख से तीन वषᲄ के िलए या मामले के िनस् तारण तक, जो भी पहले हो, िवशेष लोक अिभयोजक के रूप
मᱶ िनयुक् त करती है।
[फा. सं. 225/14/2018-एवीडी-II]
एस.पी.आर. ितर्पाठी, अवर सिचव
MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS
(Department of Personnel and Training)
New Delhi, the 30th November, 2018
S.O. 1750.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (8) of section 24 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Shivaji Prahladrao Chavan, Advocate as
Special Public Prosecutor for conducting the prosecution in Latur Sessions Case No. 78/2014 or other matters arising
out of RC 04(S)/2016/CBI/SC-1/New Delhi (Kalpana Giri murder case) instituted by the Delhi Special Police
Establishment (C.B.I.) in the Session Courts at Latur (Maharashtra) and appeals or revisions or other matters connected
therewith and incidental thereto for a period of three years from the date of appointment or disposal of the case,
whichever is earlier.
[F. No. 225/14/2018-AVD-II]
S.P.R. TRIPATHI, Under Secy.
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6597
पेटर्ोिलयम और पर्ाकृितक गैस मंतर्ालय
नई िदल्ली, 5 िदसम् बर, 2018
का. आ. 1751.—केन्दर्ीय सरकार को लोकिहत मᱶ यह आवश्यक पर्तीत होता है िक पि᳟म बंगाल राज्य मᱶ पारादीप
(उड़ीसा) से दुगार्पुर (पि᳟म बंगाल) तक वाया हिल्दया एलपीजी पिरवहन के िलए इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड के
दर्ारा एक पाइपलाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए ;
और केन्दर्ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन िबछाने के पर्योजन के िलए यह आवश्यक पर्तीत होता है िक ऐसी भूिम मᱶ जो इस से
उपाब अनुसूची मᱶ विणत है और िजसमᱶ उक्त पाइपलाइन िबछाऐ जाने का पर्स्ताव है, उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न िकया
जाए ;
अतः अब, केन्दर्ीय सरकार, पेटर्ोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन्स (भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न) अिधिनयम, 1962
(1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1) दर्ारा पर्दᱫ शिक्तयᲂ का पर्योग करते हुए, उस भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार का
अजर्न करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;
कोई ᳞िक्त, जो उक्त अनुसूची मᱶ विणत भूिम मᱶ िहतब है, उस तारीख से िजसको इस अिधसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपतर्
की पर्ितयॉ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस िदन के भीतर भूिम के नीचे पाइपलाइन िबछाए जाने के िलए
उसमᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार के अजर्न के सम्बन्ध मᱶ शर्ी िव᳡नाथ समाझदार, डब्ल्यू. बी. सी. एस. (पर्शासिनक) सेवािनवृᱫ
सक्षम पर्ािधकारी, पारादीप - हिल्दया - दुगार्पुर एलपीजी पाइपलाइन एवम् पारादीप - हिल्दया – बरौनी पाइपलाइन
ऑगमᱶटेशन योजना, डाकघर दुईल्या, आन्दुल-मौरी, मौरीगर्ाम हावड़ा-711 302 (पि᳟म बंगाल) को िलिखत रुप मᱶ आक्षेप
भेज सकेगा ।
अनुसूची
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)17/2018-ओआर-I/ई-26864]
नोवस िकन् डो, अवर सिचव
MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS
New Delhi, the 5th December, 2018
S.O. 1751.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the
transportation of Liquefied Petroleum Gas from Paradip (Odisha) to Durgapur (West Bengal) Via Haldia a pipeline
should be laid in State of West Bengal by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;
And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire
the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule
annexed hereto;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals
Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its
intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which
copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the general public, object in writing to the
acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri Biswanath Samajder, W.B.C.S
िजला : हूगली राज्य: पिश्चम बंगाल
पुिलस ःटेशन
मौजा का नाम
खसरा सं.
क्षेऽफल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
मगरा
िडंगलहाट - 44
142
00
21
60
168
00
02
10
6598
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(Exe.) Retd.Competent Authority Paradip – Haldia –Durgapur LPG Pipeline & Augmentation of Paradip – Haldia –
Barauni Pipeline Project, P.O,Duillya, Andul - Mouri, Mourigram,Howrah, 711-302 (West Bengal).
[F. No. R-11025(11)17/2018/OR-I/E-26864]
NOAS KINDO, Under Secy.
नई िदल्ली, 5 िदसम् बर, 2018
का. आ. 1752.—केन्दर्ीय सरकार को ऐसा पर्तीत होता है िक लोक िहत मᱶ यह आवश्यक है िक आंधर् पर्देश राज्य मᱶ
पेटर्ोिलयम उत्पादᲂ के पिरवहन के िलए पारादीप-हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन पिरयोजना के िकर्यान्वयन हेतु इंिडयन ऑयल
कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड ᳇ारा पाइपलाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए;
और कᱶदर्ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन िबछाने के पर्योजन के िलए यह आवश्यक पर्तीत होता है िक ऐसी भूिम मᱶ जो इस से
ऊपाब अनुसूची मᱶ विणत है, और िजसमᱶ उक्त पाइपलाइन िबछाई जाने का पर्स्ताव है, उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न िकया
जाए;
अतः अब, केन्दर्ीय सरकार, पेटर्ोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन्स (भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न) अिधिनयम 1962
(1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1) ᳇ारा पर्दᱫ शिक्तयᲂ का पर्योग करते हुए उस भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार का
अजर्न करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;
कोई भी ᳞िक्त, जो उक्त अनुसूची मᱶ विणत भूिम मᱶ िहतब है, उस तारीख से, िजसको इस अिधसूचना मᱶ युक्त भारत के
राजपतर् की पर्ितयाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हᱹ, इक्कीस (21) िदन के भीतर, भूिम के नीचे पाइपलाइन
िबछाए जाने के िलए उसमᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार के संबन्ध मᱶ शर्ी के. ए. एस जेि᳖सन, सक्षम पर्ािधकारी (आंधर् पर्देश), इंिडयन
ऑयल कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड (पाइपलाइन पर्भाग), पारादीप-हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन पिरयोजना, प्लॉट संख्या 33, कनका दुगार्
ऑिफससर् कॉलोनी, गुरुनानक नगर मेन रोड िवजयवाड़ा-520008, आंधर् पर्देश राज्य को िलिखत रूप से आक्षेप भेज सकेगा।
अनुसूची
िजला: वेस्ट गोदावरी राज्य: आन्धर्पर्देश
मंडल का नाम
गर्ाम का नाम
सवᱷ नम्बर
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
तल्लापुडी
तुपाकुलागुडेम
145
00
46
39
तल्लापुडी
अ᳖ादेवरपेटा
272/2
00
06
51
270
00
07
84
358
00
41
29
गोपालपुरम
गोपालपुरम
156/1
00
32
70
147
00
52
93
127/2
00
17
63
125
00
43
91
256/1
00
03
60
256/2A
00
10
80
SCHEDULE
District : Hooghly State : West Bengal
Police Station
Name of the Mouza
Khasra No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Square meter
1
2
3
4
5
6
Magra
Dingalhat - 44
142
00
21
60
168
00
02
10
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6599
गोपालपुरम
वेल्लािचतलागुडेम
550/1
00
24
78
537
00
30
33
538
00
28
26
कोय्यालागुडेम
कंकािदर्पुरम
88
00
05
78
कामावरपुकोटा
राम᳖ापालेम
20/9
00
06
21
16/1
00
13
68
18/7
00
05
44
18/6
00
04
89
18/5
00
04
81
19/4A
00
07
57
कामावरपुकोटा
कामावरपुकोटा
657/2
00
04
45
661/3
00
00
78
594/3
00
07
33
583/1
00
31
72
49/2
00
27
48
48
00
03
02
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)252/2017-ओ.आर-I/ई-21033]
नोवस िकन् डो, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 5th December, 2018
S.O. 1752.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government, that it is necessary in the public interest that for the
transportation of petroleum products in the state of Andhra Pradesh a pipeline should be laid for implementing Paradip-
Hyderabad Pipeline Project under Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;
And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary to
acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which is described in the
Schedule annexed to this notification;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub Section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals
Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its
intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person who is interested in the land described in the said schedule, may submit objection in writing to Shri. K.A.S
Jennyson, Competent Authority (Andhra Pradesh), Indian Oil Corporation Limited (Pipelines Division), Paradip
Hyderabad Pipeline Project, Plot No. 33, Kanaka Durga officer’s Colony , Gurunank Nagar Main Road , Vijayawada -
520008 within twenty one (21) days from the date on which the copies of this notification issued under Sub-section (1)
of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the general public.
SCHEDULE
District : West Godavari
State : Andhra Pradesh
Name of Mandal
Name of Village
Survey No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Square
Metre
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
Tallapudi
Tupakulagudem
145
00
46
39
Tallapudi
Annadevarapeta
272/2
00
06
51
270
00
07
84
358
00
41
29
Gopalapuram
Gopalapuram
156/1
00
32
70
147
00
52
93
127/2
00
17
63
6600
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Gopalapuram
Gopalapuram
125
00
43
91
256/1
00
03
60
256/2A
00
10
80
Gopalapuram
Vellachintalagudem
550/1
00
24
78
537
00
30
33
538
00
28
26
Koyyalagudem
Kankadripuram
88
00
05
78
Kamavarapukota
Ramannapalem
20/9
00
06
21
16/1
00
13
68
18/7
00
05
44
18/6
00
04
89
18/5
00
04
81
19/4A
00
07
57
Kamavarapukota
Kamavarapukota
657/2
00
04
45
661/3
00
00
78
594/3
00
07
33
583/1
00
31
72
49/2
00
27
48
48
00
03
02
[F. No. R-11025(11)252/2017-OR-I/E-21033]
NOAS KINDO, Under Secy.
नई िदल्ली, 5 िदसम् बर, 2018
का. आ. 1753.—केन्दर्ीय सरकार ने पेटर्ोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न)
अिधिनयम, 1962 (1962 का 50) (िजसे इसमᱶ इसके प᳟ात उक्त अिधिनयम कहा गया है) की धारा 3 उप धारा (1) के
अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेटर्ोिलयम और पर्ाकृितक गैस मंतर्ालय की अिधसूचना, िजसका पर्काशन भारत के
राजपतर् संख्या 36, िदनांक 15.09.2018 कर्मांक संख्या 1379 िदनांक 10.09.2018 भाग II, खण्ड 3, उप-खण्ड (ii) मᱶ
िकया गया है। इस अिधसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची मᱶ िविनिद᳥ िहमाचल राज्य की तहसील हरोली, िजला उना की भूिम मᱶ,
पंजाब राज्य मᱶ गाँव
: झुिगयां, िजला शहीद भगत िसह नगर से िहमाचल पर्देश के गाँव : पेखुबेला, िजला उना तक पैटर्ोिलयम
उत्पादᲂ के पिरवहन के िलए इंिडयन ऑइल कापᲃरेशन िलिमटेड ᳇ारा पीएजेपीएल – उना बर्ांच पाइपलाइन पिरयोजना के
सम्बंध मᱶ पाइपलाइन िबछाने के पर्योजन के िलए उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न करने के िलए अपने आशय की घोषणा की
थी।
और उक्त राजपतर् अिधसूचनाᲐ की पर्ितयाँ जनता को तारीख 07.10.2018 तक उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी।
और उक्त अिधिनयम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1) के अनुसरण मᱶ सक्षम पर्ािधकारी ने केन्दर्ीय सरकार को अपनी िरपोटर् दे दी
है।
और केन्दर्ीय सरकार ने उक्त िरपोटर् पर िवचार करने के प᳟ात और यह समाधान हो जाने पर िक उक्त भूिम पाइपलाइन
िबछाने के िलए अपेिक्षत है, उसमᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न करने का िविन᳟य िकया है।
अत: अब, केन्दर्ीय सरकार उक्त अिधिनयम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1) ᳇ारा पर्दᱫ शिक्तयᲂ का पर्योग करते हुए घोषणा करती
है िक इस अिधसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची मᱶ िविनिद᳥ भूिम मᱶ पाइपलाइन िबछाने के उपयोग का अिधकार अिजत िकया जाए।
और केन्दर्ीय सरकार उक्त अिधिनयम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) ᳇ारा पर्दᱫ शिक्तयᲂ का पर्योग करते हुए, यह िनदᱷश देती है
िक उक्त भूिम मᱶ उपयोग का अिधकार इस घोषणा के पर्काशन की तारीख से केन्दर्ीय सरकार मᱶ िनिहत होने के बजाय सभी
िवल्लंगमᲂ से मुक्त होकर इंिडयन ऑयल कापᲃरेशन िलिमटेड मᱶ िनिहत होगा।
पेटर्ोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन अिधिनयम, 1962 की धारा 10 के अधीन िकसी भी क्षितपूित के िलए इंिडयन ऑयल
कापᲃरेशन िलिमटेड पूणर्तया उᱫरदायी होगी और पाइपलाइन से सम्बिन्धत िकसी भी मामलᱶ पर केन्दर्ीय सरकार के िवरु
कोई वाद - दावा या कानूनी कायर्वाही नहᱭ हो सकेगी।
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6601
अनुसूची
िजला : उना राज्य :िहमाचल पर्देश
कर्.
सं.
तहसील का नाम
गाँव का नाम
हदबस्त नं
खसरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1
हरोली
केलुवा
2920
00
02
02
2946
00
03
60
2953/2
00
03
07
2
हरोली
बाथू
475
1821
00
06
40
1822
00
02
65
1990
00
01
45
3
हरोली
टाहलीवाल उपरला
472
407/1
00
00
20
4
हरोली
नंगल खुदर्
474
2937
00
05
57
2938
00
00
40
2942
00
12
78
5
हरोली
मानुवाल
471
2548
00
10
26
2564
00
04
50
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)248/2017-ओआर-I/ई-18228]
नोवस िकन् डो, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 5th December, 2018
S.O. 1753.—Whereas, Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and
Natural Gas, published in the Gazette No. 36, dated 15.09.2018, S.O. No. 1379, dated 10.09.2018 Part-II, section 3, sub-
section (ii) issued under sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals pipelines (Acquisition of Right of
User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) the Central Government declared its
intention to acquire the right of user in the land situated in Tehsil Haroli of District Una in Himachal Pradesh State,
specified in the schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of
petroleum product from village Jhungian, District Shahid Bhagat Singh Nagar in the State of Punjab to village
Pekhubela, District Una in the State of Himachal Pradesh by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the
"PAJPL - Una Branch Pipeline project".
And whereas the copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on 07.10.2018.
And whereas the Competent Authority has under sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, has submitted his report of
Central Government.
And whereas, the Central Government after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is
required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of the user therein;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central
Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is
hereby acquired for laying the pipeline.
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government
hereby directs that the right of user of the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the Central
6602
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Government, vests on the date of publication of the declaration, in India Oil Corporation Limited, free from all
encumbrances.
India Oil Corporation Limited shall be exclusively liable for any compensation in terms of section 10 of the P & MP Act,
1962 and no suit, claim or legal proceeding would lie against the Central Government on any matter relating to pipeline.
SCHEDULE
[F. No. R-11025(11)248/2017-OR-I/E-18228]
NOAS KINDO, Under Secy.
नई िदल्ली, 5 िदसम् बर, 2018
का. आ. 1754.—केन्दर्ीय सरकार ने पेटर्ोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न)
अिधिनयम,1962 (1962 का 50) (िजसे इसमᱶ इसके प᳟ात उक्त अिधिनयम कहा गया है) की धारा 3 की उप धारा (1) के
अधीन जारी की गई, भारत सरकार के पेटर्ोिलयम और पर्ाकृितक गैस मंतर्ालय की अिधसूचना का.आ. 2024 तारीख
28.08.2017 िजसका पर्काशन भारत के राजपतर् संख्या 35, भाग-II, खण्ड 3, उप-खण्ड (ii) तारीख 02.09.2017 मᱶ िकया
गया है । इस अिधसूचना मᱶ संलग्न अनुसूची मᱶ िविनिद᳥ ओिड़शा राज्य के तहसील : शेरगढ़, िजला : गंजाम की भूिम मᱶ,
ओिड़शा राज्य मᱶ पारादीप से तेलंगाना राज्य मᱶ हैदराबाद तक पेटर्ोिलयम उत्पादᲂ के पिरवहन के िलये इंिडयन ऑयल
कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड के ᳇ारा िकर्यािन्वत िकए जा रहे "पारादीप-हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन पिरयोजना” के संबंध मᱶ पाइपलाइन
िबछाने के पर्योजन के िलये उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न करने के िलये अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी;
और उक्त राजपतर् अिधसूचना की पर्ितयाँ जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थᱭ। और उक्त अिधिनयम की धारा 6 की उपधारा
(1) के अनुसरण मᱶ सक्षम पर्ािधकारी नᱶ केन्दर्ीय सरकार को अपनी िरपोटर् दे दी है;
और केन्दर्ीय सरकार ने उक्त िरपोटर् पर िवचार करने के प᳟ात और यह समाधान हो जाने पर िक उक्त भूिम पाइपलाइन
िबछाने के िलये अपेिक्षत है, उसमᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न करने का िविनष्चय िकया है;
अत :अब, केन्दर्ीय सरकार उक्त अिधिनयम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1) ᳇ारा पर्दᱫ शिक्तयᲂ का पर्योग करते हुए एतद् ᳇ारा
घोषणा करती है िक इस अिधसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूिच मᱶ िविनिद᳥ भूिम मᱶ पाइपलाइन िबछाने के उपयोग का अिधकार
अिजत िकया जाए; और केन्दर्ीय सरकार उक्त अिधिनयम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) ᳇ारा पर्दᱫ शिक्तयᲂ का पर्योग करते हुए,
यह िनदᱷश देती है िक उक्त भूिम मᱶ उपयोग का अिधकार इस घोषणा के पर्काशन की तारीख से केन्दर्ीय सरकार मᱶ िनिहत होने
के बजाए सभी िबल्लंगमᲂ से मुक्त होकर इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड मᱶ िनिहत होगा।
District : Una State : Himachal Pradesh
Sr.
No.
Name of
Tehsil
Name of
Village
Hadbast
No.
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq. mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1
Haroli
Keluwa
2920
00
02
02
2946
00
03
60
2953/2
00
03
07
2
Haroli
Bathu
475
1821
00
06
40
1822
00
02
65
1990
00
01
45
3
Haroli
Tahliwal
Upparla
472
407/1
00
00
20
4
Haroli
Nangal Khurd
474
2937
00
05
57
2938
00
00
40
2942
00
12
78
5
Haroli
Manuwal
471
2548
00
10
26
2564
00
04
50
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6603
िकिᱫपुर
1153
00
05
76
1231
00
01
13
1245
00
05
39
1257
00
02
07
1256
00
03
04
1255
00
00
10
1278
00
06
35
1277
00
05
58
1270
00
01
88
1509
00
11
60
1507
00
05
38
1524
00
05
31
1526
00
03
66
1572/1609
00
03
90
1572
00
04
60
1571
00
03
60
1570
00
04
81
1569
00
08
64
1583
00
06
82
1582
00
00
10
1592
00
00
66
1591
00
05
70
1593/1694
00
01
83
1601
00
05
72
1589
00
03
47
1602
00
08
98
1603
00
00
94
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)236/2017-ओआर-I/ई-13717]
नोवस िकन् डो, अवर सिचव
अनुसूची
तहसील- शेरगढ़
िजला - गंजाम
राज्य -ओिड़शा
गाँव का नाम
प्लॉट नं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6604
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
New Delhi, the 5th December, 2018
S.O. 1754.—Whereas, by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural
Gas, published in the Gazette of India No. 35 Part-II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii) dated 02.09.2017 vide S.O. Number
:2024 dated 28.08.2017 issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals pipelines (Acquisition
of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962),(hereinafter referred to as the said Act) the Central Government
declared its intension to acquire the right of user in the land situted in Tehsil-Sheragada, District-Ganjam in Odisha State,
specified in the schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of
petroleum products from Paradip in the State of Odisha to Hyderabad in the State of Telengana by the Indian Oil
Corporation Limited for implementing the “Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline Project”.
And whereas the copies of the Gazette were made available to the public. And whereas the Competent Authority has
under Sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, has submitted his report of Central Government;
And whereas, the Central Government after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is
required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of the user therein;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central
Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the schedule appended to this notification is
hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government
hereby directs that the right of user of the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the Central
Government, vests on the date of publication of the declaration, in Indian Oil Corporation Limited, free from all
encumbrances.
SCHEDULE
Tehsil: SHERAGADA
District : GANJAM
State : ODISHA
Name of the Village
Plot No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
KIRTIPUR
1153
00
05
76
1231
00
01
13
1245
00
05
39
1257
00
02
07
1256
00
03
04
1255
00
00
10
1278
00
06
35
1277
00
05
58
1270
00
01
88
1509
00
11
60
1507
00
05
38
1524
00
05
31
1526
00
03
66
1572/1609
00
03
90
1572
00
04
60
1571
00
03
60
1570
00
04
81
1569
00
08
64
1583
00
06
82
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6605
KIRTIPUR
1582
00
00
10
1592
00
00
66
1591
00
05
70
1593/1694
00
01
83
1601
00
05
72
1589
00
03
47
1602
00
08
98
1603
00
00
94
[F. No. R-11025(11)236/2017-OR-I/E-13717]
NOAS KINDO, Under Secy.
नई िदल्ली, 5 िदसम् बर, 2018
का. आ. 1755.—केन्दर्ीय सरकार ने पेटर्ोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन्स (भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न)
अिधिनयम, 1962 (1962 का 50) (िजसे इसमᱶ इसके प᳟ात उक्त अिधिनयम कहा गया है) की धारा 3 उप धारा (1) के
अधीन जारी की गई, भारत सरकार के पेटर्ोिलयम और पर्ाकृितक गैस मंतर्ालय की अिधसूचना संख्या का.आ.
1071(E),1073(E) और 1074(E) तारीख 03.04.2017 िजसका पर्काशन भारत के राजपतर् संख्या 948, भाग II, खण्ड 3,
उप खण्ड (ii) तारीख अपर्ैल 06, 2017, का.आ. 2028 तारीख िजसका पर्काशन भारत के राजपतर् संख्या 35 , भाग II, खण्ड
3, उप खण्ड (ii) तारीख अगस्त 27 – िसतंबर 02, 2017 और का.आ. 371 तारीख 16.12.2017 िजसका पर्काशन भारत के
राजपतर् संख्या 9, भाग II, खण्ड 3, उप खण्ड (ii) तारीख फरवरी 25 - माचर् 03, 2018 मᱶ िकया गया है। इस अिधसूचना मᱶ
संलग्न अनुसूची मᱶ िविनिद᳥ आंधर्पर्देश राज्य के पोलावरम, तल्लापुडी, गोपालपुरम, देवारापल्ली, कोय्यालागुडेम, ᳇ारका-
ितरुमला, कामावरपुकोटा, टी. नरसापुरम और िचतलापूडी मंडल वेस्टगोदावरी िजला की भूिम मᱶ, ओडीशा राज्य मᱶ पारादीप
से तेलंगाना राज्य मᱶ हैदराबाद तक पेटर्ोिलयम उत्पादᲂ के पिरवहन के िलए इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपᱷरेशन िलिमटेड के ᳇ारा
िकर्यािन्वत िकए जा रहे “पारादीप-हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन पिरयोजना”के संबंध मᱶ पाइपलाइन िबछाने के पर्योजन के िलए
उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न करने के िलए अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी:
और उक्त राजपतर् अिधसूचना की पर्ितयाँ जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थᱭ। और उक्त अिधिनयम की धारा 6 की उपधारा
(1) के अनुसरण मᱶ सक्षम पर्ािधकारी ने केन्दर्ीय सरकार को अपनी िरपोटर् दे दी है।
और केन्दर्ीय सरकार ने उक्त िरपोटर् पर िवचार करने के प᳟ात और यह समाधान हो जाने पर िक उक्त भूिम पाइपलाइन
िबछाने के िलए अपेिक्षत है, उसमᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न करने का िविनश् चय िकया है:
अतः अब, केन्दर्ीय सरकार उक्त अिधिनयम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1) ᳇ारा पर्दᱫ शिक्तयᲂ का पर्योग करते हुए एतद् ᳇ारा
घोषणा करती है िक इस अिधसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूिच मᱶ िविनिद᳥ भूिम मᱶ पाइपलाइन िबछाने के उपयोग का अिधकार
अिजत िकया जाए:
और केन्दर्ीय सरकार उक्त अिधिनयम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) ᳇ारा पर्दᱫ शिक्तयᲂ का पर्योग करते हुए, यह िनदᱷश देती है
िक उक्त भूिम मᱶ उपयोग का अिधकार इस घोषणा के पर्काशन की तारीख से केन्दर्ीय सरकार मᱶ िनिहत होने के बजाए सभी
िबल्लंगमᲂ से मुक्त होकर इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपᱷरेशन िलिमटेड मᱶ िनिहत होगा।
अनुसूची
िजला: वेस्टगोदावरी राज्य: आन्धर्पर्देश
मंडल का नाम
गर्ाम का नाम
सवᱷ नम्बर
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
पोलावरम
गुटाला
828
00
38
15
तल्लापुडी
तुपाकुलागुडेम
172/1B
00
09
06
172/2
00
27
72
6606
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
तल्लापुडी
तुपाकुलागुडेम
188
00
02
21
173/1
00
02
12
तल्लापुडी
अ᳖ादेवरपेटा
179/3
00
07
90
272/1
00
00
05
263/4A
00
05
25
267/2
00
19
74
267/1
00
24
04
332
00
24
78
360
00
14
74
गोपालपुरम
वेल्लािचतलागुडेम
590-2D
00
05
61
गोपालपुरम
गोपालपुरम
161
00
16
78
256/3A
00
10
80
गोपालपुरम
कोमिटकुंटा
61/1C
00
68
33
गोपालपुरम
वडलागुन्टा
12
00
61
17
देवारापल्ली
यदावोलु
118-6C
00
04
99
118-2B
00
00
12
255/1D
00
02
03
कोय्यालागुडेम
कंकािदर्पुरम
96
00
42
79
कोय्यालागुडेम
राजवाराम
483/2
00
39
33
214
00
53
65
207
01
65
32
515
00
20
93
᳇ारकाितरुमला
आई. एस. राघवापुरम
476/2
00
09
08
474/4
00
02
82
458/3
00
02
84
कामावरपुकोटा
यडाविल्ल
184/1
00
21
80
185/5
00
07
80
कामावरपुकोटा
राम᳖ापालेम
20/19
00
06
21
20/8
00
06
76
20/4
00
08
93
20/3
00
01
30
कामावरपुकोटा
कामावरपुकोटा
653/5
00
03
50
653/4
00
05
82
653/3
00
08
02
653/2
00
04
11
575/1
00
02
23
574/3
00
10
76
574/4
00
01
65
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6607
कामावरपुकोटा
कामावरपुकोटा
53/2
00
08
98
53/1
00
07
41
टी. नरसापुरम
कृष्णारावुपालेम
10/1A
00
18
96
िचतलापूडी
वᱶकमपालेम
75/8A
00
12
08
.
िचतलापूडी
पर्गडावरम
670
00
14
76
575/2B
00
00
06
225/2
00
17
83
224/1
00
06
36
226
00
17
04
227
00
36
23
217/2A
00
04
22
217/1
00
13
56
210/6
00
16
46
159
00
25
91
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)252/2017-ओआर-I/ई-21033]
नोवस िकन् डो, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 5th December, 2018
S.O. 1755.—Whereas, by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural
Gas, published in the Gazette of India No. 948 Part-II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii)dated April 06, 2017 Under S.O.
No.1071(E), 1073(E)& S.O. No. 1074(E) dated 03.04.2017, No. 35 Part-II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii)dated Aug 27-Sept
02, 2017 Under S.O. No. 2028 dated 28.08.2017 and No. 9 Part-II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii) dated February 25- March
03, 2018 vide S.O. Number 371 dated 16.12.2017 issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and
Minerals pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act)
the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land situated in Mandal Polavaram,
Tallapudi, Gopalapuram, Devarapalli, Koyyalagudem, Dwaraka Tirumala, Chintalapudi, T Narsapuram and
Kamavarapukota District West Godavari of Andhra Pradesh State, specified in the schedule appended to that notification
for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of petroleum products from Paradip in the State of Odisha to
Hyderabad in the State of Telangana by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the "Paradip–Hyderabad
Pipeline Project".
And whereas the copies of the Gazette were made available to the public. And whereas the Competent Authority has
under Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, has submitted his report of Central Government.
And whereas, the Central Government after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is
required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of the user therein;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central
Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is
hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government
hereby directs that the right of user of the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the Central
Government, vests on the date of publication of the declaration, in India Oil Corporation Limited, free from all
encumbrances.
6608
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
SCHEDULE
District: West Godavari State: Andhra Pradesh
Name of Mandal
Name of Village
Survey No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Square Metre
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
Polavaram
Gutala
828
00
38
15
Tallapudi
Tupakulagudem
172/1B
00
09
06
172/2
00
27
72
188
00
02
21
173/1
00
02
12
Tallapudi
Annadevarapeta
179/3
00
07
90
272/1
00
00
05
263/4A
00
05
25
267/2
00
19
74
267/1
00
24
04
332
00
24
78
360
00
14
74
Gopalapuram
Vellachintalagudem
590-2D
00
05
61
Gopalapuram
Gopalapuram
161
00
16
78
256/3A
00
10
80
Gopalapuram
Komatikunta
61/1C
00
68
33
Gopalapuram
Vadlagunta
12
00
61
17
Devarapalli
Yadavolu
118-6C
00
04
99
118-2B
00
00
12
255/1D
00
02
03
Koyyalagudem
Kankadripuram
96
00
42
79
Koyyalagudem
Rajavaram
483/2
00
39
33
214
00
53
65
207
01
65
32
515
00
20
93
Dwaraka Tirumala
I.S Raghavapuram
476/2
00
09
08
474/4
00
02
82
458/3
00
02
84
Kamavarapukota
Yadavalli
184/1
00
21
80
185/5
00
07
80
Kamavarapukota
Ramannapalem
20/19
00
06
21
20/8
00
06
76
20/4
00
08
93
20/3
00
01
30
Kamavarapukota
Kamavarapukota
653/5
00
03
50
653/4
00
05
82
653/3
00
08
02
653/2
00
04
11
575/1
00
02
23
574/3
00
10
76
574/4
00
01
65
53/2
00
08
98
53/1
00
07
41
T Narasapuram
Krishnaraopalem
10/1A
00
18
96
Chintalapudi
Venkampalem
75/8A
00
12
08
.
Chintalapudi
Pragadavaram
670
00
14
76
575/2B
00
00
06
225/2
00
17
83
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6609
224/1
00
06
36
226
00
17
04
227
00
36
23
217/2A
00
04
22
217/1
00
13
56
210/6
00
16
46
159
00
25
91
[F. No. R-11025(11)252/2017/OR-I/E-21033]
NOAS KINDO, Under Secy.
नई िदल्ली, 5 िदसम् बर, 2018
का. आ. 1756.—केन्दर्ीय सरकार को ऐसा पर्तीत होता है िक लोक िहत मᱶ यह आवश्यक है िक आंधर् पर्देश राज्य मᱶ
पेटर्ोिलयम उत्पादᲂ के पिरवहन के िलए पारादीप-हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन पिरयोजना के िकर्यान्वयन हेतु इंिडयन ऑयल
कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड ᳇ारा पाइपलाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए;
और कᱶदर्ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन िबछाने के पर्योजन के िलए यह आवश्यक पर्तीत होता है िक ऐसी भूमी मᱶ जो इस से
ऊपाब अनुसूची मᱶ विणत है, और िजसमᱶ उक्त पाइपलाइन िबछाई जाने का पर्स्ताव है, उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न िकया
जाए;
अतः अब, केन्दर्ीय सरकार, पेटर्ोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन्स (भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न) अिधिनयम 1962
(1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1) ᳇ारा पर्दᱫ शिक्तयᲂ का पर्योग करते हुए उस भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार का
अजर्न करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;
कोई भी ᳞िक्त, जो उक्त अनुसूची मᱶ विणत भूिम मᱶ िहतब है, उस तारीख से, िजसको इस अिधसूचना मᱶ युक्त भारत के
राजपतर् की पर्ितयाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हᱹ, इक्कीस (21) िदन के भीतर, भूिम के नीचे पाइपलाइन
िबछाए जाने के िलए उसमᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार के संबन्ध मᱶ शर्ी एम. आर. आर. शेषु, सक्षम पर्ािधकारी (आंधर् पर्देश), इंिडयन
ऑयल कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड (पाइपलाइन्स पर्भाग), पारादीप-हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन पिरयोजना, चौथी मंिजल, एल.आई.सी.
एनेक्सी भवन, िथक्कना (डायमंड पाकर्) रोड़, आर.टी.सी. कॉम्पलेक्स के पास, िवखाशापटनम - 530004, आंधर् पर्देश राज्य को
िलिखत रूप से आक्षेप भेज सकेगा।
अनुसूची
िजला : शर्ीकाकुलम राज्य : आँधर् पर्देश
मंडल का नाम
गर्ाम का नाम
सवᱷ नम्बर
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
टेक्किल
सवरापेटा
79/4
00
00
20
79/12
00
00
35
79/9
00
00
03
75/7
00
03
00
टेक्किल
तेिलनीलापुरम
32/15
00
00
03
32/12
00
00
49
32/11
00
01
39
32/5
00
10
08
37/7
00
00
73
37/1
00
00
02
6610
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
टेक्किल
तेिलनीलापुरम
37/3
00
00
04
42/12
00
05
53
40/9
00
00
05
42/7
00
00
09
41/10b
00
04
95
39/1
00
07
69
टेक्किल
तलागाम
2/6B
00
03
42
1/15A
00
02
57
1/16A
00
01
54
1/16B
00
01
66
5/3
00
00
35
5/12
00
00
10
5/7
00
00
27
6/5
00
00
05
6/4
00
00
29
11/3
00
00
14
16/2
00
01
29
16/3
00
00
03
15/11
00
03
58
160/4
00
00
03
160/6
00
00
02
160/13
00
00
11
212/2
00
00
31
212/14
00
00
12
212/16
00
00
04
212/9
00
00
02
212/17
00
00
26
212/18
00
05
15
176/14
00
00
07
176/10
00
00
02
210/68
00
00
07
210/67
00
00
35
210/65
00
00
39
210/64
00
00
34
210/11
00
00
31
210/12
00
00
71
210/19
00
00
17
210/28P
00
00
21
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6611
टेक्किल
तलागाम
159/13p
00
05
67
210/1B
00
01
83
260
00
06
48
9/5
00
00
01
टेक्किल
संपितरावु रामाकृष्णापुरम
257/1
00
01
45
264/3
00
01
74
264/4
00
00
41
264/8
00
01
67
267/3
00
00
44
268
00
00
60
269
00
00
19
271/1
00
00
10
276
00
00
12
277/6
00
00
69
257/6
00
03
24
265/2P
00
01
42
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)252/2017-ओआर-I/ई-21033]
नोवस िकन् डो, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 5th December, 2018
S.O. 1756.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government, that it is necessary in the public interest that for the
transportation of petroleum products in the state of Andhra Pradesh a pipeline should be laid for implementing Paradip-
Hyderabad Pipeline Project under Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;
And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary to
acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which is described in the
Schedule annexed to this notification;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub Section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals
Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its
intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person who is interested in the land described in the said schedule, may submit objection in writing to Shri. M. R. R.
Seshu, Competent Authority (Andhra Pradesh) Indian Oil Corporation Limited (Pipelines Division), Paradip Hyderabad
Pipeline Project, 4th floor, LIC Annexe Building, Thikkana (Diamond Park) Road, Near RTC Complex, Visakhapatnam -
530004 within twenty one (21) days from the date on which the copies of this notification issued under Sub-section (1)
of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the general public.
SCHEDULE
DISTRICT : SRIKAKULAM
STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH
MANDAL
VILLAGE
SURVEY NO.
AREA
Hectare
Are
Sq. Mt.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
TEKKALI
SAVARAPETA
79/4
00
00
20
79/12
00
00
35
79/9
00
00
03
75/7
00
03
00
6612
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
TEKKALI
TELINILAPURAM
32/15
00
00
03
32/12
00
00
49
32/11
00
01
39
32/5
00
10
08
37/7
00
00
73
37/1
00
00
02
37/3
00
00
04
42/12
00
05
53
40/9
00
00
05
42/7
00
00
09
41/10b
00
04
95
39/1
00
07
69
TEKKALI
TALAGAM
2/6B
00
03
42
1/15A
00
02
57
1/16A
00
01
54
1/16B
00
01
66
5/3
00
00
35
5/12
00
00
10
5/7
00
00
27
6/5
00
00
05
6/4
00
00
29
11/3
00
00
14
16/2
00
01
29
16/3
00
00
03
15/11
00
03
58
160/4
00
00
03
160/6
00
00
02
160/13
00
00
11
212/2
00
00
31
212/14
00
00
12
212/16
00
00
04
212/9
00
00
02
212/17
00
00
26
212/18
00
05
15
176/14
00
00
07
176/10
00
00
02
210/68
00
00
07
210/67
00
00
35
210/65
00
00
39
210/64
00
00
34
210/11
00
00
31
210/12
00
00
71
210/19
00
00
17
210/28P
00
00
21
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6613
[F. No. R-11025(11)252/2017/OR-I/E-21033]
NOAS KINDO, Under Secy.
नई िदल्ली, 5 िदसम् बर, 2018
का. आ. 1757.—केन्दर्ीय सरकार को ऐसा पर्तीत होता है िक लोक िहत मᱶ यह आवश्यक है िक आंधर् पर्देश राज्य मᱶ
पेटर्ोिलयम उत्पादᲂ के पिरवहन के िलए पारादीप- हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन पिरयोजना के िकर्यान्वयन हेतु इंिडयन ऑयल
कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड ᳇ारा पाइपलाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए;
और कᱶदर्ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन िबछाने के पर्योजन के िलए यह आवश्यक पर्तीत होता है िक ऐसी भूमी मᱶ जो इस से
ऊपाब अनुसूची मᱶ विणत है, और िजसमᱶ उक्त पाइपलाइन िबछाई जाने का पर्स्ताव है, उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न िकया
जाए;
अतः अब, केन्दर्ीय सरकार, पेटर्ोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन्स (भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न) अिधिनयम 1962
(1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1) ᳇ारा पर्दᱫ शिक्तयᲂ का पर्योग करते हुए उस भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार का
अजर्न करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;
कोई भी ᳞िक्त, जो उक्त अनुसूची मᱶ विणत भूिम मᱶ िहतब है, उस तारीख से, िजसको इस अिधसूचना मᱶ युक्त भारत के
राजपतर् की पर्ितयाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हᱹ, इक्कीस (21) िदन के भीतर, भूिम के नीचे पाइपलाइन
िबछाए जाने के िलए उसमᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार के संबन्ध मᱶ शर्ी एम. आर. आर. शेषु, सक्षम पर्ािधकारी (आंधर् पर्देश), इंिडयन
ऑयल कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड (पाइपलाइन्स पर्भाग), पारादीप-हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन पिरयोजना, चौथी मंिजल, एल.आई.सी.
एनेक्सी भवन, िथक्कना (डायमंड पाकर्) रोड़, आर.टी.सी. कॉम्पलेक्स के पास, िवशाशापटनम - 530004, आंधर् पर्देश राज्य को
िलिखत रूप से आक्षेप भेज सकेगा।
अनुसूची
िजला : शर्ीकाकुलम राज्य : आँधर् पर्देश
मंडल का नाम
गर्ाम का नाम
सवᱷ नम्बर
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
संताबोम्मािल
इज्जावरम
4/19
00
00
19
8/2B
00
05
84
TEKKALI
TALAGAM
159/13p
00
05
67
210/1B
00
01
83
260
00
06
48
17/10
00
00
01
TEKKALI
SAMPATIRAO
RAMAKRISHNAPURAM
257/1
00
01
45
264/3
00
01
74
264/4
00
00
41
264/8
00
01
67
267/3
00
00
44
268
00
00
60
269
00
00
19
271/1
00
00
10
276
00
00
12
277/6
00
00
69
257/6
00
03
24
265/2P
00
01
42
6614
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
41/5
00
01
62
38/4
00
01
42
संताबोम्मािल
बृंदावनम
4/10
00
00
07
4/6
00
00
99
4/1
00
00
22
2/9
00
00
01
2/8
00
00
07
2/5
00
00
11
36/6
00
12
95
संताबोम्मािल
अिरकावलासा
83/3
00
01
51
81/2C
00
04
72
79/2
00
05
41
80/1
00
00
47
80/7
00
00
94
67/13
00
01
86
67/11
00
00
05
68/4
00
00
47
69/2
00
04
50
70/14
00
03
97
70/5
00
00
10
70/4
00
00
30
43/7A
00
0
11
43/4
00
01
27
43/1
00
01
25
30/9D
00
01
58
30/7
00
01
00
30/5
00
01
88
29/3
00
00
39
16/8
00
00
72
16/7
00
00
86
16/9
00
00
73
16/5
00
01
80
5/6
00
00
48
5/4
00
00
68
5/3
00
00
11
16/13
00
09
21
17/7P
00
01
22
16/14
00
02
23
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6615
संताबोम्मािल
दंडुगोपालापुरम
1/1
00
05
60
संताबोम्मािल
िच᳖ातुंगाम
9/2
00
00
68
9/4
00
00
16
11/9
00
00
83
11/7
00
00
44
12/9
00
00
15
12/8A
00
00
63
12/8B
00
00
23
14/4
00
00
03
14/7
00
00
07
43/1
00
00
34
9/5
00
00
01
संताबोम्मािल
पेातुंगाम
36/3
00
00
90
39/8
00
00
05
38/4
00
00
44
51
00
00
35
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)252/2017-ओ.आर-I/ई-21033]
नोवस िकन् डो, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 5th December, 2018
S.O. 1757.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government, that it is necessary in the public interest that for the
transportation of petroleum products in the state of Andhra Pradesh a pipeline should be laid for implementing Paradip-
Hyderabad Pipeline Project under Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;
And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary to
acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which is described in the
Schedule annexed to this notification;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub Section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals
Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its
intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person who is interested in the land described in the said schedule, may submit objection in writing to Shri. M. R. R.
Seshu, Competent Authority (Andhra Pradesh) Indian Oil Corporation Limited (Pipelines Division), Paradip Hyderabad
Pipeline Project, 4th floor, LIC Annexe Building, Thikkana (Diamond Park) Road, Near RTC Complex, Visakhapatnam -
530004 within twenty one (21) days from the date on which the copies of this notification issued under Sub-section (1)
of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the general public.
SCHEDULE
DISTRICT : SRIKAKULAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH
MANDAL
VILLAGE
SURVEY
NO.
AREA
Hectare
Are
Sq.
Mt.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
SANTA BOMMALI
IJJAVARAM
4/19
00
00
19
8/2B
00
05
84
41/5
00
01
62
38/4
00
01
42
6616
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
SANTA BOMMALI
BRUNDAVANAM
4/10
00
00
07
4/6
00
00
99
4/1
00
00
22
2/9
00
00
01
2/8
00
00
07
2/5
00
00
11
36/6
00
12
95
SANTA BOMMALI
ARIKAVALASA
83/3
00
01
51
81/2C
00
04
72
79/2
00
05
41
80/1
00
00
47
80/7
00
00
94
67/13
00
01
86
67/11
00
00
05
68/4
00
00
47
69/2
00
04
50
70/14
00
03
97
70/5
00
00
10
70/4
00
00
30
43/7A
00
0
11
43/4
00
01
27
43/1
00
01
25
30/9D
00
01
58
30/7
00
01
00
30/5
00
01
88
29/3
00
00
39
16/8
00
00
72
16/7
00
00
86
16/9
00
00
73
16/5
00
01
80
5/6
00
00
48
5/4
00
00
68
5/3
00
00
11
16/13
00
09
21
17/7P
00
01
22
16/14
00
02
23
SANTA BOMMALI
DANDUGOPALAPURAM
1/1
00
05
60
SANTA BOMMALI
CHINNA TUNGAM
9/2
00
00
68
9/4
00
00
16
11/9
00
00
83
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6617
11/7
00
00
44
12/9
00
00
15
12/8A
00
00
63
12/8B
00
00
23
14/4
00
00
03
14/7
00
00
07
43/1
00
00
34
9/5
00
00
01
SANTA BOMMALI
PEDDATUNGAM
36/3
00
00
90
39/8
00
00
05
38/4
00
00
44
51
00
00
35
[F. No. R-11025(11)252/2017/OR-I/E-21033]
NOAS KINDO, Under Secy.
नई िदल्ली, 6 िदसम् बर, 2018
का. आ. 1758.—केन्दर्ीय सरकार ने पेटर्ोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न)
अिधिनयम, 1962 (1962 का 50) (िजसे इसमᱶ इसके प᳟ात उक्त अिधिनयम कहा गया है) की धारा 3 उप धारा (1) के
अधीन जारी की गई, भारत सरकार के पेटर्ोिलयम और पर्ाकृितक गैस मंतर्ालय की अिधसूचना का.आ. 2102 तारीख
07.09.2017 िजसका पर्काशन भारत के राजपतर् संख्या 36, भाग II, खण्ड 3, उप खण्ड (ii) तारीख 09.09.2017 मᱶ िकया
गया है। इस अिधसूचना मᱶ संलग्न अनुसूची मᱶ िविनिद᳥ आंधर्पर्देश राज्य के िजला िवजयानगरम के मंडल :गुलार्, गिरिविड़,
कोतावलासा एवं चीपुरुपिल्ल की भूिम मᱶ, ओडीशा राज्य मᱶ पारादीप से तेलंगाना राज्य मᱶ हैदराबाद तक पेटर्ोिलयम उत्पादᲂ
के पिरवहन के िलए इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपᱷरेशन िलिमटेड के ᳇ारा िकर्यािन्वत िकए जा रहे “पारादीप-हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन
पिरयोजना” के संबंध मᱶ पाइपलाइन िबछाने के पर्योजन के िलए उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न करने के िलए अपने आशय की
घोषणा की थी:
और उक्त राजपतर् अिधसूचना की पर्ितयाँ जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थᱭ।और उक्त अिधिनयम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1)
के अनुसरण मᱶ सक्षम पर्ािधकारी नᱶ केन्दर्ीय सरकार को अपनी िरपोटर् दे दी है।
और केन्दर्ीय सरकार ने उक्त िरपोटर् पर िवचार करने के प᳟ात और यह समाधान हो जाने पर िक उक्त भूिम पाइपलाइन
िबछाने के िलए अपेिक्षत है, उसमᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न करने का िविनश् चय िकया है:
अतः अब, केन्दर्ीय सरकार उक्त अिधिनयम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1) ᳇ारा पर्दᱫ शिक्तयᲂ का पर्योग करते हुए एतद् ᳇ारा
घोषणा करती है िक इस अिधसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूिच मᱶ िविनिद᳥ भूिम मᱶ पाइपलाइन िबछाने के उपयोग का अिधकार
अिजत िकया जाए:
और केन्दर्ीय सरकार उक्त अिधिनयम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) ᳇ारा पर्दᱫ शिक्तयᲂ का पर्योग करते हुए, यह िनदᱷश देती है
िक उक्त भूिम मᱶ उपयोग का अिधकार इस घोषणा के पर्काशन की तारीख से केन्दर्ीय सरकार मᱶ िनिहत होने के बजाए सभी
िबल्लंगमᲂ से मुक्त होकर इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपᱷरेशन िलिमटेड मᱶ िनिहत होगा
अनुसूची
िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश
मंडल का नाम
गर्ाम का नाम
सवᱷ नम्बर
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
चीपुरुपिल्ल
पिᱫकायावलासा
197/17
00
00
12
202/8
00
00
34
6618
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश
मंडल का नाम
गर्ाम का नाम
सवᱷ नम्बर
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
चीपुरुपिल्ल
पिᱫकायावलासा
202/9
00
01
34
173/8
00
07
05
173/7
00
05
67
173/9
00
04
71
173/6
00
00
49
173/5
00
07
43
170/17
00
04
01
170/16
00
00
88
170/18
00
05
49
170/19
00
05
25
170/20
00
02
27
170/22
00
01
07
170/21
00
03
85
170/7
00
02
11
170/6
00
02
10
170/5
00
03
80
170/4
00
03
05
167/18
00
00
14
167/17
00
03
11
167/12
00
00
10
167/11
00
01
47
167/10
00
03
43
167/7
00
05
87
167/3
00
00
10
167/6
00
04
31
167/5
00
05
76
166/3
00
04
25
चीपुरुपिल्ल
पेदानिड़पिल्ल
95/3
00
09
45
95/2
00
03
24
95/1
00
27
85
86/2
00
30
43
87/10
00
01
05
87/11
00
00
73
87/9
00
06
87
87/13
00
01
00
87/14
00
03
40
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6619
िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश
मंडल का नाम
गर्ाम का नाम
सवᱷ नम्बर
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
चीपुरुपिल्ल
पेदानिड़पिल्ल
87/15
00
03
30
87/16
00
04
31
87/17
00
04
45
87/18
00
00
72
53/1
00
00
36
53/9
00
03
94
53/11
00
15
53
53/10
00
05
42
55/1
00
02
12
53/5
00
08
64
55/3
00
06
74
55/7
00
04
18
55/6
00
01
13
55/8
00
05
26
55/10
00
07
30
55/9
00
00
10
56/1
00
00
60
56/2
00
14
44
56/3
00
02
70
57
00
02
70
69/1
00
06
04
69/2
00
14
47
69/3
00
03
42
69/5
00
03
04
69/6
00
03
69
69/9
00
01
53
71/6
00
08
11
71/3
00
08
50
72/2
00
13
72
72/1
00
02
43
72/4
00
11
53
72/8
00
00
10
72/7
00
08
68
73/6
00
02
91
73/5
00
09
94
73/4
00
10
17
6620
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश
मंडल का नाम
गर्ाम का नाम
सवᱷ नम्बर
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
73/3
00
01
99
चीपुरुपिल्ल
िचनानिड़पिल्ल
43/1
00
05
58
42/2
00
01
62
42/7
00
04
68
42/9
00
07
77
42/10
00
08
90
42/13
00
02
37
42/12
00
05
18
42/11
00
00
10
39
00
16
83
38/1
00
05
91
38/5
00
00
10
18/10
00
00
10
18/11
00
01
22
18/14
00
04
93
18/15
00
00
10
18/13
00
01
45
18/16
00
06
66
19/15
00
00
17
19/16
00
01
13
19/20
00
02
39
19/21
00
02
22
19/22
00
03
70
19/23
00
01
64
19/28
00
00
77
19/27
00
02
99
19/29
00
00
26
19/30
00
01
42
19/31
00
00
53
19/26
00
02
43
20/2
00
00
18
21/6
00
03
86
21/7
00
04
04
21/8
00
00
22
21/10
00
02
47
21/11
00
00
41
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6621
िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश
मंडल का नाम
गर्ाम का नाम
सवᱷ नम्बर
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
चीपुरुपिल्ल
िचनानिड़पिल्ल
21/15
00
02
71
21/12
00
00
36
21/16
00
00
32
21/17
00
13
86
21/21
00
00
34
21/20
00
00
10
7/15
00
00
75
25/1
00
07
96
26/3
00
11
24
26/2
00
28
92
26/1
00
03
33
27/1
00
10
96
27/2
00
04
07
27/9
00
01
40
27/8
00
00
10
चीपुरुपिल्ल
इटाकलार्पिल्ल
168/18
00
09
28
168/22
00
00
13
168/23
00
03
66
168/30
00
01
45
168/31
00
00
10
168/27
00
03
99
168/26
00
00
88
168/28
00
00
60
168/24
00
03
61
168/25
00
00
10
168/10
00
10
92
169/7
00
00
36
169/6
00
02
36
169/2
00
05
74
169/3
00
01
05
169/4
00
00
26
169/1
00
01
99
166/14
00
01
39
166/13
00
02
89
166/15
00
00
81
166/16
00
05
93
6622
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश
मंडल का नाम
गर्ाम का नाम
सवᱷ नम्बर
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
चीपुरुपिल्ल
इटाकलार्पिल्ल
166/4
00
00
10
166/3
00
02
45
166/2
00
01
51
166/17
00
01
58
166/1
00
00
22
166/18
00
04
10
165/14
00
02
07
165/15
00
02
64
165/16
00
02
19
165/17
00
02
30
165/6
00
07
09
165/5
00
02
32
165/18
00
00
10
165/19
00
04
34
165/20
00
04
40
165/22
00
01
24
164/24
00
06
61
164/21
00
03
17
164/20
00
02
88
164/19
00
03
04
164/18
00
03
08
164/16
00
08
04
156/26
00
16
66
156/23
00
03
63
156/22
00
01
32
156/25
00
05
19
156/13
00
06
94
156/12
00
15
08
156/11
00
00
50
155/45
00
04
33
155/23
00
02
19
155/17
00
03
27
155/16
00
02
05
155/14
00
01
62
154/7
00
00
32
154/6
00
02
54
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6623
िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश
मंडल का नाम
गर्ाम का नाम
सवᱷ नम्बर
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
चीपुरुपिल्ल
इटाकलार्पिल्ल
154/5
00
03
77
154/3
00
03
05
154/2
00
04
23
154/1
00
04
28
153/20
00
00
10
153/19
00
01
13
153/18
00
02
50
153/17
00
02
24
153/16
00
02
71
152/3
00
11
94
150/13
00
07
19
150/6
00
11
04
150/7
00
01
82
177/3
00
06
19
177/2
00
16
64
177/1
00
07
88
178/1
00
03
90
176/3
00
11
17
176/2
00
07
61
176/1
00
22
51
147/3
00
34
43
चीपुरुपिल्ल
पोतायावलसा
78/4
00
19
96
78/3
00
21
48
76/2
00
21
85
76/1
00
02
34
70/4
00
08
66
72/2
00
22
74
72/3
00
03
36
72/4
00
04
13
चीपुरुपिल्ल
पलार्
154/15
00
29
21
155/6
00
01
65
163/2
00
04
50
162/23
00
00
77
162/22
00
00
43
162/19
00
00
67
162/18
00
00
95
6624
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश
मंडल का नाम
गर्ाम का नाम
सवᱷ नम्बर
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
चीपुरुपिल्ल
पलार्
161/17
00
01
48
161/16
00
03
05
162/14
00
01
26
162/13
00
00
81
161/9
00
01
45
162/10
00
00
86
162/9
00
01
11
161/8
00
00
77
161/5
00
02
55
161/4
00
02
71
161/2
00
00
79
161/1
00
07
54
160/19
00
01
20
160/20
00
01
17
160/21
00
00
97
160/14
00
00
79
160/15
00
02
25
160/9
00
01
19
160/10
00
01
11
160/5
00
01
83
160/3
00
00
53
160/4
00
02
78
100/28
00
00
91
100/26
00
00
92
184/2
00
03
83
184/1
00
03
78
185/15
00
02
00
185/16
00
03
05
185/13
00
00
32
185/12
00
04
98
185/11
00
05
96
185/4
00
03
07
185/3
00
00
93
185/2
00
00
82
185/1
00
01
08
189/18
00
00
50
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6625
िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश
मंडल का नाम
गर्ाम का नाम
सवᱷ नम्बर
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
चीपुरुपिल्ल
पलार्
186
00
06
59
189/12
00
05
75
188/2
00
02
86
188/5
00
00
38
188/7
00
00
65
188/8
00
00
48
188/9
00
00
77
188/1
00
05
42
189/11
00
00
86
191/17
00
05
08
191/16
00
00
64
191/14
00
01
55
191/13
00
02
29
191/12
00
01
15
191/3
00
08
02
192/19
00
02
17
192/8
00
04
37
192/18
00
00
53
192/17
00
01
19
192/11
00
02
97
192/12
00
01
93
192/10
00
03
28
192/4
00
00
10
192/3
00
00
12
192/2
00
00
88
192/13
00
01
71
192/1
00
01
94
193/3
00
00
16
193/2
00
00
96
193/1
00
00
64
78/15
00
00
10
गिरिविड़
दुम्मेदा
179/16
00
03
48
179/12
00
07
06
179/13
00
00
13
179/10
00
01
21
175/19
00
05
63
6626
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश
मंडल का नाम
गर्ाम का नाम
सवᱷ नम्बर
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
गिरिविड़
दुम्मेदा
176/10
00
01
57
176/9
00
04
04
176/8
00
04
72
176/7
00
02
67
176/6
00
09
87
176/4
00
13
10
60
00
03
47
176/3
00
15
67
165/4
00
10
39
165/5
00
02
40
165/2
00
00
12
165/6
00
02
05
165/7
00
14
22
165/12
00
04
79
165/13
00
00
10
164/25
00
02
67
164/31
00
04
86
164/30
00
06
53
164/29
00
02
96
164/11
00
00
26
163/5
00
00
26
163/4
00
07
79
163/2
00
00
10
163/3
00
00
79
69/16
00
04
20
70/1
00
15
02
70/5
00
04
29
70/9
00
00
62
70/6
00
00
10
68/1
00
00
94
67/7
00
02
32
67/6
00
11
85
66/6
00
01
18
66/3
00
02
99
66/1
00
07
80
66/4
00
01
68
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6627
िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश
मंडल का नाम
गर्ाम का नाम
सवᱷ नम्बर
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
गिरिविड़
दुम्मेदा
85/5
00
00
51
85/2
00
09
16
85/3
00
00
66
85/7
00
07
56
85/9
00
01
49
85/10
00
00
20
85/8
00
04
61
85/11
00
08
14
85/13
00
02
01
95/16
01
02
28
95/15
00
02
32
95/14
00
04
52
95/17
00
01
10
96/2
00
06
85
96/3
00
02
13
96/4
00
00
18
96/8
00
04
27
96/7
00
00
10
96/9
00
05
67
96/14
00
00
58
96/13
00
05
57
96/12
00
00
22
96/19
00
09
01
97/1
00
05
75
97/2
00
05
20
97/3
00
10
34
101/11
00
02
82
101/35
00
14
13
101/36
00
02
09
101/28
00
00
82
101/29
00
00
10
101/27
00
02
57
101/26
00
01
94
101/24
00
04
15
101/23
00
02
16
100/20
00
02
56
6628
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश
मंडल का नाम
गर्ाम का नाम
सवᱷ नम्बर
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
गिरिविड़
दुम्मेदा
100/19
00
00
14
100/7
00
00
25
100/8
00
03
84
100/9
00
03
99
100/11
00
00
16
100/12
00
02
87
107/27
00
02
63
100/13
00
02
07
107/28
00
02
47
107/29
00
01
39
107/18
00
00
52
107/15
00
02
89
107/16
00
01
77
107/13
00
02
00
107/12
00
03
64
107/11
00
02
84
130/19
00
00
10
107/9
00
00
95
130/14
00
10
58
107/4
00
01
78
107/3
00
05
34
129/1
00
00
10
108
00
24
54
127/2
00
04
64
127/3
00
04
74
गुलार्
सदानंदापुरम
73/8
00
00
88
73/5
00
01
10
गुलार्
नगल्लावलसा
86/15
00
00
10
87/20
00
06
21
87/22
00
00
40
87/21
00
01
65
87/18
00
06
63
87/19
00
00
30
87/16
00
00
36
87/25
00
00
84
87/17
00
05
98
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6629
िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश
मंडल का नाम
गर्ाम का नाम
सवᱷ नम्बर
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
गुलार्
नगल्लावलसा
87/2
00
03
25
84/29
00
02
26
84/31
00
00
59
84/30
00
00
70
84/27
00
00
27
84/28
00
05
29
84/25
00
02
85
84/24
00
00
10
82/1
00
05
54
83/2
00
21
51
83/5
00
01
26
83/4
00
01
93
83/3
00
01
39
56
00
06
00
54/13
00
08
77
54/12
00
00
35
55/11
00
01
30
55/10
00
13
20
55/9
00
00
94
55/8
00
10
00
55/12
00
01
67
55/13
00
00
24
43
00
03
37
42/10
00
23
10
42/6
00
01
30
42/5
00
01
87
41/14
00
04
24
41/12
00
02
57
41/11
00
02
26
41/6
00
02
38
41/1
00
02
69
40/28
00
04
02
40/23
00
02
35
40/16
00
01
27
40/15
00
00
90
40/9
00
01
45
6630
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश
मंडल का नाम
गर्ाम का नाम
सवᱷ नम्बर
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
गुलार्
नगल्लावलसा
40/8
00
00
43
39/11
00
00
17
39/8
00
00
10
39/12
00
05
04
39/22
00
00
45
39/23
00
00
53
39/13
00
01
80
39/14
00
00
19
39/5
00
02
66
39/4
00
00
19
39/3
00
01
59
37/24
00
05
31
37/15
00
04
94
37/14
00
02
82
37/13
00
02
65
37/6
00
02
81
37/5
00
01
24
62/2
00
00
10
62/1
00
02
45
34/19
00
00
46
34/15
00
00
78
34/13
00
01
10
34/10
00
00
55
34/9
00
00
10
65/11
00
03
21
65/1
00
06
15
65/9
00
03
50
65/8
00
00
55
65/7
00
08
21
65/2
00
04
74
65/6
00
02
31
65/3
00
02
80
29/1
00
03
02
29/10
00
01
14
29/11
00
04
34
29/12
00
03
94
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6631
िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश
मंडल का नाम
गर्ाम का नाम
सवᱷ नम्बर
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
गुलार्
नगल्लावलसा
29/13
00
01
40
29/15
00
04
50
29/16
00
05
26
29/18
00
07
84
29/17
00
00
49
66/2
00
02
76
66/3
00
01
75
66/4
00
00
10
66/1
00
00
91
गुलार्
जम्मु
88/11
00
12
18
90/3
00
08
63
90/4
00
00
30
90/2
00
04
74
90/7
00
07
54
90/6
00
01
08
93/21
00
06
59
93/22
00
02
74
93/12
00
03
58
93/24
00
07
63
93/13
00
00
12
93/9
00
01
03
93/11
00
02
72
93/10
00
04
18
93/7
00
00
74
93/5
00
04
89
93/6
00
00
10
95/20
00
00
10
95/21
00
01
81
95/22
00
06
45
95/24
00
04
04
95/23
00
00
81
97/23
00
00
10
97/22
00
04
73
97/12
00
03
53
97/21
00
00
56
97/11
00
01
39
6632
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश
मंडल का नाम
गर्ाम का नाम
सवᱷ नम्बर
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
गुलार्
जम् मू
97/13
00
01
34
97/10
00
00
10
97/14
00
05
00
97/15
00
01
19
97/7
00
03
67
97/6
00
05
08
97/3
00
03
33
97/2
00
00
54
275/3
00
00
27
275/2
00
01
38
275/1
00
06
12
275/10
00
00
93
270/22
00
00
22
270/23
00
02
83
270/26
00
01
40
270/24
00
00
10
270/27
00
01
96
270/28
00
05
52
270/25
00
00
69
270/10
00
01
73
269/12
00
04
96
269/11
00
01
05
269/14
00
00
32
269/10
00
04
62
269/9
00
04
08
269/8
00
00
30
269/5
00
01
86
269/7
00
01
52
296/6
00
01
15
269/4
00
00
10
268/4
00
02
20
268/3
00
02
79
268/2
00
04
22
268/1
00
04
40
101/13
00
07
57
113/2
00
09
84
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6633
िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश
मंडल का नाम
गर्ाम का नाम
सवᱷ नम्बर
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
गुलार्
जम् मू
112/5
00
00
68
112/8
00
07
47
112/10
00
08
40
112/9
00
03
09
111/2
00
00
10
111/1
00
05
56
111/3
00
01
84
109/3
00
00
10
109/5
00
00
50
109/13
00
01
07
109/12
00
03
09
109/11
00
01
61
109/10
00
01
10
110/1
00
01
83
108/14
00
01
08
108/15
00
03
20
108/18
00
00
28
108/19
00
02
80
108/12
00
00
10
108/13
00
00
90
108/20
00
04
17
108/23
00
03
41
108/24
00
08
79
108/25
00
01
39
107/35
00
04
59
117/2
00
16
18
117/1
00
10
16
119/1
00
08
59
118/9
00
01
13
118/2
00
06
05
126/36
00
03
37
126/35
00
02
25
126/34
00
02
70
126/9
00
02
74
126/8
00
00
10
123/6
00
00
10
6634
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश
मंडल का नाम
गर्ाम का नाम
सवᱷ नम्बर
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
गुलार्
जम् मू
123/5
00
00
68
123/1
00
06
69
123/2
00
00
10
125
00
05
30
151/11
00
01
50
151/14
00
02
00
151/15
00
00
40
151/12
00
02
55
151/10
00
01
70
151/6
00
08
40
152/8
00
02
23
152/1
00
00
10
182/25
00
00
10
182/26
00
05
26
182/27
00
00
45
182/18
00
00
35
182/19
00
02
05
182/17
00
02
27
182/11
00
01
00
182/9
00
00
10
182/10
00
02
00
182/12
00
02
71
182/13
00
00
41
183/19
00
00
72
183/18
00
00
38
183/17
00
00
10
183/20
00
02
48
183/21
00
04
95
183/24
00
00
36
183/22
00
01
39
183/23
00
00
22
183/7
00
00
92
183/6
00
01
95
183/5
00
01
33
183/4
00
01
72
183/3
00
01
55
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6635
िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश
मंडल का नाम
गर्ाम का नाम
सवᱷ नम्बर
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
गुलार्
जम् मू
183/2
00
06
47
179/12
00
01
14
179/13
00
04
71
179/11
00
02
55
179/10
00
02
37
179/2
00
02
35
179/1
00
02
94
178/24
00
01
52
178/23
00
01
44
178/22
00
01
62
178/4
00
00
10
178/3
00
04
29
178/2
00
00
52
178/1
00
02
19
176/31
00
00
10
176/30
00
10
89
176/1
00
05
82
175/23
00
00
15
175/20
00
06
34
175/19
00
01
90
197/19
00
06
76
197/20
00
04
79
197/30
00
00
89
197/29
00
00
69
197/28
00
00
73
197/27
00
00
28
197/26
00
00
39
197/25
00
00
36
197/24
00
00
25
197/23
00
03
85
196/19
00
14
35
196/25
00
09
19
196/20
00
00
66
196/21
00
01
55
196/24
00
00
20
196/23
00
00
35
6636
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश
मंडल का नाम
गर्ाम का नाम
सवᱷ नम्बर
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
गुलार्
जम् मू
196/22
00
00
54
209/2
00
01
99
211/19
00
01
71
211/18
00
00
40
211/7
00
13
43
211/17
00
00
16
211/6
00
00
10
211/8
00
00
19
211/16
00
00
10
211/10
00
02
51
211/9
00
02
22
211/11
00
02
81
211/12
00
02
57
211/15
00
00
30
211/14
00
00
61
211/13
00
02
15
216/4
00
04
95
216/3
00
00
14
214/12
00
00
10
214/11
00
00
65
214/10
00
01
03
214/9
00
04
80
214/7
00
00
28
214/8
00
07
49
गुलार्
गिरड़ा
99/23
00
02
04
99/24
00
02
68
99/25
00
01
33
99/26
00
03
58
99/17
00
01
92
99/27
00
02
53
99/28
00
02
43
99/29
00
02
43
99/15
00
01
92
99/14
00
04
31
99/13
00
00
11
99/1
00
07
92
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6637
िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश
मंडल का नाम
गर्ाम का नाम
सवᱷ नम्बर
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
गुलार्
गिरड़ा
76/6
00
05
45
76/7
00
00
55
76/9
00
15
63
75/14
00
01
83
75/12
00
03
61
75/13
00
00
62
75/11
00
05
60
75/1
00
00
16
79/15
00
00
10
79/14
00
02
06
79/12
00
01
94
79/11
00
00
10
80/20
00
06
96
80/18
00
00
32
80/12
00
02
90
80/13
00
03
31
80/5
00
02
65
80/4
00
05
34
80/2
00
01
05
31/8
00
02
10
31/7
00
00
93
32/19
00
00
10
32/18
00
01
46
32/17
00
02
45
32/16
00
01
32
30/20
00
00
60
30/19
00
00
10
30/16
00
02
65
30/15
00
02
68
30/14
00
00
10
30/6
00
01
19
30/7
00
09
41
30/5
00
01
26
30/4
00
02
33
30/3
00
00
85
34/34
00
00
98
6638
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश
मंडल का नाम
गर्ाम का नाम
सवᱷ नम्बर
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
गुलार्
गिरड़ा
34/32
00
01
73
34/31
00
01
74
34/23
00
02
10
34/22
00
00
20
34/24
00
01
59
34/25
00
00
10
34/14
00
00
73
34/15
00
01
15
34/16
00
00
19
34/9
00
01
53
34/8
00
01
31
34/4
00
03
33
34/2
00
01
68
34/3
00
00
21
35/2
00
00
10
35/5
00
00
54
35/6
00
00
81
35/8
00
01
09
35/7
00
00
21
35/9
00
00
66
35/10
00
00
56
35/11
00
00
49
35/12
00
02
35
35/13
00
01
41
35/14
00
00
48
35/17
00
00
10
35/32
00
02
49
35/34
00
01
81
35/35
00
00
35
35/31
00
00
10
12/12
00
00
30
12/13
00
00
10
12/11
00
01
77
12/10
00
02
80
12/9
00
02
59
12/7
00
03
92
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6639
िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश
मंडल का नाम
गर्ाम का नाम
सवᱷ नम्बर
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
गुलार्
गिरड़ा
12/6
00
03
00
12/5
00
05
66
7/10
00
04
82
7/9
00
04
37
7/24
00
01
46
7/23
00
00
99
7/22
00
00
32
7/21
00
00
14
7/20
00
00
25
7/19
00
00
62
7/11
00
06
94
7/12
00
02
64
7/13
00
05
21
7/14
00
00
10
7/15
00
00
10
6/19
00
06
93
6/20
00
05
10
6/21
00
05
05
6/22
00
05
44
6/23
00
05
47
6/24
00
02
81
3/3
00
01
92
3/9
00
00
20
3/8
00
01
55
3/7
00
02
99
3/6
00
07
20
3/5
00
02
80
3/11
00
04
00
3/12
00
00
10
2/8
00
08
95
2/4
00
07
65
2/5
00
06
16
2/6
00
01
12
2/12
00
00
10
2/13
00
11
70
गुलार्
गोलार्पेटाजग᳖ाधपुरम
23/2
00
01
62
6640
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश
मंडल का नाम
गर्ाम का नाम
सवᱷ नम्बर
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
गुलार्
गोलार्पेटाजग᳖ाधपुरम
23/21
00
03
87
23/20
00
00
58
23/18
00
01
14
23/17
00
02
76
23/16
00
04
17
23/10
00
02
20
23/13
00
01
19
23/12
00
02
29
23/11
00
02
10
23/9
00
01
11
22/12
00
08
39
22/26
00
00
18
22/25
00
00
73
22/13
00
02
67
22/24
00
02
60
22/23
00
03
65
22/18
00
05
75
18/21
00
00
19
18/23
00
00
40
18/22
00
03
34
13/13
00
03
81
14/8
00
02
90
14/7
00
05
42
14/6
00
07
63
14/3
00
08
11
14/2
00
10
31
14/1
00
00
59
15/1
00
07
77
11/16
00
02
57
11/15
00
21
61
11/14
00
00
10
गुलार्
केल्ला
34/1
00
03
30
33/2
00
30
05
7
00
41
17
8/18
00
02
52
8/21
00
19
06
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6641
िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश
मंडल का नाम
गर्ाम का नाम
सवᱷ नम्बर
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
गुलार्
केल्ला
8/25
00
08
32
8/24
00
00
87
8/20
00
06
85
8/19
00
00
29
13/23
00
00
20
13/22
00
08
90
13/21
00
00
57
13/20
00
04
87
13/17
00
09
30
13/16
00
03
39
13/15
00
05
38
13/1
00
04
38
13/2
00
00
10
347/20
00
05
56
346/2
00
07
69
346/1
00
00
45
346/3
00
11
01
346/4
00
11
90
346/7
00
00
65
346/6
00
01
72
346/5
00
06
57
346/8
00
01
20
14/10
00
06
47
14/9
00
00
10
गुलार्
गोषाड़ा
24/16
00
00
10
24/17
00
08
46
24/18
00
04
21
24/20
00
00
86
24/19
00
06
71
24/8
00
02
96
24/9
00
04
49
24/10
00
02
36
25/1
00
01
38
21/14
00
03
00
21/10
00
07
07
21/9
00
01
42
6642
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश
मंडल का नाम
गर्ाम का नाम
सवᱷ नम्बर
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
गुलार्
गोषाड़ा
21/8
00
00
10
21/5
00
01
98
21/6
00
02
00
21/1
00
04
91
20/12
00
03
88
20/10
00
04
42
20/9
00
01
37
20/5
00
03
39
19/2
00
05
61
19/1
00
13
54
19/4
00
00
56
16/1
00
07
51
16/5
00
03
28
16/3
00
06
70
16/4
00
00
10
15/6
00
05
30
15/5
00
01
83
15/3
00
00
15
15/8
00
07
34
15/9
00
04
40
15/15
00
00
25
15/14
00
01
49
15/12
00
00
89
57/5
00
03
16
57/6
00
03
40
57/7
00
03
56
57/10
00
01
50
57/12
00
04
04
57/9
00
01
27
57/13
00
05
05
57/14
00
00
29
64/2
00
01
28
64/5
00
05
23
64/8
00
05
46
65/1
00
10
72
65/2
00
11
90
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6643
िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश
मंडल का नाम
गर्ाम का नाम
सवᱷ नम्बर
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
गुलार्
गोषाड़ा
66/3
00
04
68
66/2
00
00
10
66/4
00
02
67
66/5
00
04
73
66/6
00
04
15
66/17
00
00
90
66/16
00
04
67
66/15
00
00
90
66/13
00
01
73
68/9
00
03
08
68/8
00
03
93
68/7
00
06
76
68/4
00
03
53
68/3
00
06
31
68/5
00
00
39
68/6
00
00
92
69/1
00
01
79
गुलार्
कलवाचेलार्
60/6
00
00
46
60/7
00
01
87
60/8
00
02
83
60/11
00
02
42
60/9
00
01
13
60/3
00
00
17
60/10
00
01
22
62/4
00
00
10
62/5
00
02
82
62/6
00
01
46
62/7
00
00
95
62/8
00
03
56
62/9
00
01
85
29/14
00
03
99
29/15
00
04
53
29/13
00
00
81
29/12
00
00
55
29/11
00
00
54
29/16
00
02
83
6644
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश
मंडल का नाम
गर्ाम का नाम
सवᱷ नम्बर
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
गुलार्
कलवाचेलार्
29/17
00
00
10
29/10
00
02
71
29/32
00
00
10
29/9
00
02
55
29/8
00
04
96
29/3
00
04
22
29/33
00
00
10
29/2
00
02
68
29/1
00
02
94
30/21
00
00
60
30/20
00
01
00
30/19
00
01
04
30/18
00
01
71
30/14
00
00
38
30/17
00
02
91
30/16
00
03
14
30/15
00
03
10
30/6
00
03
63
30/4
00
03
49
30/3
00
01
54
28/2
00
01
66
28/1
00
04
22
32/8
00
02
90
32/7
00
00
23
32/9
00
01
54
32/10
00
01
94
32/11
00
02
24
32/12
00
00
10
32/6
00
02
77
32/5
00
00
45
32/3
00
02
79
32/2
00
04
43
34/14
00
00
59
34/10
00
00
58
34/9
00
02
38
34/8
00
01
36
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6645
िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश
मंडल का नाम
गर्ाम का नाम
सवᱷ नम्बर
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
गुलार्
कलवाचेलार्
34/7
00
01
60
34/2
00
02
06
34/1
00
04
34
37/7
00
05
21
37/4
00
05
61
37/9
00
00
30
37/10
00
00
35
37/11
00
00
44
37/2
00
00
10
37/3
00
04
34
37/12
00
04
24
38
00
03
55
39/6
00
00
47
39/7
00
02
24
39/5
00
08
87
39/8
00
00
10
39/3
00
00
29
39/10
00
06
27
39/11
00
02
64
39/13
00
00
54
39/12
00
04
73
2/10
00
00
36
1/3
00
20
37
2/6
00
03
85
2/7
00
05
89
गुलार्
कोटागंडर्ेड़ु
92/3
00
10
90
86/1
00
00
42
63/8
00
03
62
63/9
00
00
31
64/22
00
00
32
64/21
00
01
49
64/20
00
04
57
64/15
00
15
90
64/5
00
00
39
64/3
00
02
62
64/2
00
00
26
6646
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश
मंडल का नाम
गर्ाम का नाम
सवᱷ नम्बर
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
गुलार्
कोटागंडर्ेड़ु
65/5
00
08
61
48/16
00
12
10
48/17
00
03
74
48/3
00
00
69
48/1
00
05
73
31/30
00
04
32
31/23
00
06
01
31/12
00
01
80
31/11
00
03
52
31/25
00
00
17
31/9
00
00
12
31/10
00
01
09
31/4
00
01
91
31/3
00
01
28
31/2
00
00
10
34/4
00
03
09
34/5
00
00
97
34/6
00
03
01
34/3
00
02
59
34/2
00
02
76
34/1
00
10
80
गुलार्
आनंदपुरम एंड िबट
194/2
00
07
78
194/3
00
00
83
194/4
00
00
68
194/5
00
00
81
194/6
00
01
48
194/1
00
03
35
195/5
00
00
67
195/4
00
00
82
195/3
00
00
34
195/6
00
01
32
195/7
00
02
51
195/2
00
00
25
195/10
00
17
62
195/9
00
00
10
195/11
00
00
47
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6647
िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश
मंडल का नाम
गर्ाम का नाम
सवᱷ नम्बर
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
गुलार्
आनंदपुरम एंड िबट
197/18
00
00
10
197/19
00
02
16
197/15
00
00
62
197/14
00
47
77
197/13
00
01
32
197/6
00
03
09
197/9
00
01
33
197/7
00
04
24
197/5
00
00
32
197/8
00
03
15
197/1
00
11
74
198/2
00
00
10
200/4
00
18
00
200/3
00
07
54
200/1
00
02
23
199/12
00
00
17
199/9
00
17
00
184/1
00
28
78
184/6
00
01
07
कोतावलासा
नरापाम
10
00
01
93
8/1
00
18
47
4/3
00
08
70
5/10
00
00
93
5/16
00
07
37
5/19
00
00
10
91/1
00
08
28
91/2
00
07
29
कोतावलासा
देवाड़ा
154/3
00
19
14
152/2
00
00
93
152/4
00
09
67
152/5
00
06
47
152/6
00
01
77
155/1
00
02
52
155/2
00
01
23
155/7
00
00
50
155/8
00
00
72
6648
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश
मंडल का नाम
गर्ाम का नाम
सवᱷ नम्बर
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
कोतावलासा
देवाड़ा
155/9
00
09
83
157/2
00
00
72
157/1
00
09
84
157/6
00
05
14
157/5
00
00
10
157/8
00
03
40
159/2
00
07
21
176/1
00
01
17
179/1
00
00
11
180/1
00
01
60
180/10
00
06
15
180/11
00
06
89
180/14
00
07
28
180/16
00
01
36
180/23
00
05
54
180/22
00
05
22
180/26
00
00
13
180/19
00
03
33
180/20
00
08
50
180/29
00
00
29
182/8
00
00
93
कोतावलासा
वीराभदर्ापुरम
61/1
00
06
45
61/2
00
00
53
61/3
00
06
55
61/4
00
07
02
61/6
00
02
35
61/13
00
07
15
61/9
00
01
84
61/10
00
01
63
61/11
00
01
38
61/12
00
01
90
59/2
00
04
55
59/7
00
11
10
63/5
00
06
87
63/6
00
06
16
63/8
00
00
10
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6649
िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश
मंडल का नाम
गर्ाम का नाम
सवᱷ नम्बर
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
कोतावलासा
वीराभदर्ापुरम
63/10
00
00
10
63/15
00
06
71
58/7
00
00
10
64/3
00
00
10
64/6
00
00
35
65/1
00
05
35
65/3
00
06
17
65/4
00
00
15
66/5
00
00
71
कोतावलासा
सुंदरय्यापेटा
4/19
00
18
65
4/4
00
00
42
4/5
00
01
28
4/6
00
05
19
4/14
00
05
09
4/17
00
00
40
4/16
00
01
01
4/15
00
04
36
4/21
00
04
59
26/3
00
02
59
26/2
00
06
28
26/4
00
02
82
7/23
00
00
60
7/24
00
05
81
7/19
00
00
96
7/18
00
00
66
7/26
00
01
89
7/27
00
00
63
7/35
00
00
62
7/34
00
04
49
7/36
00
04
43
7/38
00
02
75
7/17
00
00
29
7/39
00
00
95
7/15
00
01
09
7/41
00
02
95
7/40
00
00
57
6650
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश
मंडल का नाम
गर्ाम का नाम
सवᱷ नम्बर
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
कोतावलासा
सुंदरय्यापेटा
24/2
00
01
37
24/3
00
00
88
24/4
00
00
30
24/1
00
01
15
24/5
00
00
78
24/7
00
00
30
24/15
00
06
41
24/28
00
01
85
24/29
00
03
01
24/27
00
00
64
24/37
00
03
82
24/39
00
00
10
24/35
00
01
02
24/36
00
00
76
24/38
00
00
96
20/4
00
00
17
20/5
00
10
96
20/9
00
00
10
20/6
00
01
15
20/7
00
00
82
20/8
00
00
57
22/1
00
01
38
22/3
00
02
48
21/1
00
02
78
21/3
00
00
10
21/2
00
08
69
21/21
00
04
08
21/27
00
02
80
21/28
00
00
40
21/30
00
03
75
21/31
00
07
77
21/38
00
00
33
40/16
00
09
81
40/18
00
00
21
40/23
00
04
17
40/28
00
00
10
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6651
िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश
मंडल का नाम
गर्ाम का नाम
सवᱷ नम्बर
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
कोतावलासा
सुंदरय्यापेटा
40/25
00
02
22
40/27
00
02
08
40/29
00
05
41
41/20
00
00
21
41/19
00
15
91
41/22
00
00
10
41/27
00
03
60
41/28
00
00
64
41/29
00
00
10
42/3
00
00
10
50/19
00
03
51
50/23
00
00
49
48/1
00
00
24
48/2
00
03
12
48/3
00
04
05
48/4
00
00
37
48/20
00
00
74
48/19
00
06
34
कोतावलासा
चीपुरुवलासा
116
00
03
02
113/4
00
03
50
113/10
00
21
05
112/2
00
06
35
108/5
00
01
70
108/6
00
07
45
108/7
00
00
24
108/19
00
00
15
108/17
00
03
30
108/18
00
00
10
108/16
00
01
14
108/15
00
04
06
108/13
00
01
22
108/12
00
00
15
41/6
00
01
00
41/23
00
00
86
41/24
00
01
88
41/16
00
00
10
6652
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश
मंडल का नाम
गर्ाम का नाम
सवᱷ नम्बर
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
कोतावलासा
चीपुरुवलासा
41/27
00
00
76
41/29
00
03
95
41/37
00
04
04
41/36
00
00
51
41/38
00
00
84
42/13
00
00
92
106/1
00
00
10
106/2
00
02
37
106/22
00
02
72
106/19
00
01
32
106/23
00
00
29
106/24
00
00
65
106/20
00
01
28
106/17
00
00
10
106/16
00
02
76
106/29
00
01
12
106/15
00
02
51
106/37
00
02
90
106/36
00
00
10
106/38
00
01
69
106/12
00
00
82
106/41
00
02
01
98/1
00
05
65
98/2
00
01
51
98/3
00
01
14
98/7
00
00
52
98/9
00
13
46
98/6
00
00
38
98/10
00
00
45
98/11
00
02
53
98/12
00
00
51
98/13
00
04
28
97/10
00
00
34
97/1
00
07
55
97/8
00
00
10
97/9
00
01
16
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6653
िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश
मंडल का नाम
गर्ाम का नाम
सवᱷ नम्बर
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
कोतावलासा
चीपुरुवलासा
97/7
00
00
10
97/11
00
03
66
97/12
00
03
17
97/13
00
01
91
97/14
00
00
56
97/20
00
00
10
95/5
00
01
10
95/4
00
00
61
106/31
00
00
10
106/25
00
00
10
97/5
00
00
10
41/15
00
00
10
108/22
00
00
10
106/11
00
00
10
96/16
00
00
10
कोतावलासा
गुिलिवदाड़ा
28/8
00
05
98
27/2
00
00
42
27/4
00
04
61
27/7
00
15
43
27/8
00
01
57
27/9
00
00
93
25/1
00
02
15
25/3
00
10
31
25/7
00
03
70
25/5
00
00
86
25/6
00
00
74
25/9
00
03
12
24/2
00
00
12
24/3
00
00
92
24/14
00
00
10
24/13
00
02
32
24/16
00
00
10
24/17
00
04
20
24/9
00
00
81
38/1
00
00
30
38/2
00
12
74
6654
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश
मंडल का नाम
गर्ाम का नाम
सवᱷ नम्बर
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
कोतावलासा
गुिलिवदाड़ा
38/9
00
02
88
38/7
00
00
10
38/10
00
01
20
38/8
00
10
91
37/8
00
12
98
37/7
00
00
10
37/9
00
00
26
37/11
00
00
29
37/13
00
00
13
37/14
00
06
68
37/17
00
10
19
36/7
00
01
30
41/1
00
07
12
41/2
00
00
24
41/14
00
08
82
41/18
00
00
68
41/19
00
10
66
44/33
00
07
16
43/1
00
09
21
43/3
00
04
32
51/8
00
03
65
51/10
00
00
95
52/1
00
01
39
52/2
00
13
48
53/1
00
01
59
55/8
00
12
45
55/6
00
00
41
55/7
00
00
23
55/10
00
06
33
55/11
00
02
30
54/9
00
00
98
54/11
00
06
38
31/2
00
00
76
61/11
00
02
39
61/5
00
03
71
61/15
00
02
56
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6655
िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश
मंडल का नाम
गर्ाम का नाम
सवᱷ नम्बर
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
कोतावलासा
गुिलिवदाड़ा
61/16
00
06
30
60/3
00
04
48
60/5
00
00
50
60/4
00
01
83
60/7
00
02
36
60/6
00
01
65
60/13
00
04
95
कोतावलासा
दᱶदेरु
3/1
00
01
34
3/20
00
00
10
3/22
00
03
82
3/23
00
00
10
3/27
00
04
42
3/28
00
05
43
3/26
00
02
12
8/2
00
14
15
7/1
00
03
18
39/2
00
01
22
39/11
00
06
90
39/8
00
00
10
39/9
00
04
92
41/4
00
00
27
41/14
00
08
47
41/13
00
04
14
41/15
00
01
37
41/16
00
06
86
46
00
28
31
47/3
00
01
00
47/8
00
21
61
47/9
00
07
69
47/11
00
09
83
6656
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश
मंडल का नाम
गर्ाम का नाम
सवᱷ नम्बर
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
कोतावलासा
संतापालेम
16/1
00
50
99
16/2
00
34
09
15/3
00
00
39
19
00
39
35
20
00
26
46
25
00
29
88
24
00
31
32
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)252/2017-ओआर-I/ई-21033]
नोवस िकन् डो, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 6th December, 2018
S.O. 1758.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural
Gas, published in the Gazette of India No.36 Part-II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii) dated 09.09.2017 vide S.O. Number 2102
dated 07.09.2017 issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals pipelines (Acquisition of
Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) the Central Government declared
its intention to acquire the right of user in the land situated in Mandals:Gurla, Garividi, Kothavalasa,Chipurupalle and
Chipurupalli of VizianagaramDistrictin Andhra Pradesh State, specified in the schedule appended to that notification for
the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of petroleum products from Paradip in the State of Odisha to
Hyderabad in the State of Telangana by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the "Paradip–Hyderabad
Pipeline Project".
And whereas the copies of the Gazette were made available to the public. And whereas the Competent Authority has
under Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, has submitted his report of Central Government.
And whereas, the Central Government after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is
required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of the user therein;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central
Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is
hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government
hereby directs that the right of user of the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the Central
Government, vests on the date of publication of the declaration, in India Oil Corporation Limited, free from all
encumbrances.
SCHEDULE
DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH
MANDAL
VILLAGE
SURVEY NO.
AREA
Hectare
Are
Sq. Mt.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
CHIPURUPALLE
PATTIKAYAVALASA
197/17
00
00
12
202/8
00
00
34
202/9
00
01
34
173/8
00
07
05
173/7
00
05
67
173/9
00
04
71
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6657
DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH
MANDAL
VILLAGE
SURVEY NO.
AREA
Hectare
Are
Sq. Mt.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
CHIPURUPALLE
PATTIKAYAVALASA
173/6
00
00
49
173/5
00
07
43
170/17
00
04
01
170/16
00
00
88
170/18
00
05
49
170/19
00
05
25
170/20
00
02
27
170/22
00
01
07
170/21
00
03
85
170/7
00
02
11
170/6
00
02
10
170/5
00
03
80
170/4
00
03
05
167/18
00
00
14
167/17
00
03
11
167/12
00
00
10
167/11
00
01
47
167/10
00
03
43
167/7
00
05
87
167/3
00
00
10
167/6
00
04
31
167/5
00
05
76
166/3
00
04
25
CHIPURUPALLE
PEDANADIPALLE
95/3
00
09
45
95/2
00
03
24
95/1
00
27
85
86/2
00
30
43
87/10
00
01
05
87/11
00
00
73
87/9
00
06
87
87/13
00
01
00
87/14
00
03
40
87/15
00
03
30
87/16
00
04
31
87/17
00
04
45
87/18
00
00
72
53/1
00
00
36
53/9
00
03
94
53/11
00
15
53
53/10
00
05
42
55/1
00
02
12
53/5
00
08
64
55/3
00
06
74
55/7
00
04
18
55/6
00
01
13
6658
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH
MANDAL
VILLAGE
SURVEY NO.
AREA
Hectare
Are
Sq. Mt.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
CHIPURUPALLE
PEDANADIPALLE
55/8
00
05
26
55/10
00
07
30
55/9
00
00
10
56/1
00
00
60
56/2
00
14
44
56/3
00
02
70
57
00
02
70
69/1
00
06
04
69/2
00
14
47
69/3
00
03
42
69/5
00
03
04
69/6
00
03
69
69/9
00
01
53
71/6
00
08
11
71/3
00
08
50
72/2
00
13
72
72/1
00
02
43
72/4
00
11
53
72/8
00
00
10
72/7
00
08
68
73/6
00
02
91
73/5
00
09
94
73/4
00
10
17
73/3
00
01
99
CHIPURUPALLE
CHINANADIPALLI
43/1
00
05
58
42/2
00
01
62
42/7
00
04
68
42/9
00
07
77
42/10
00
08
90
42/13
00
02
37
42/12
00
05
18
42/11
00
00
10
39
00
16
83
38/1
00
05
91
38/5
00
00
10
18/10
00
00
10
18/11
00
01
22
18/14
00
04
93
18/15
00
00
10
18/13
00
01
45
18/16
00
06
66
19/15
00
00
17
19/16
00
01
13
19/20
00
02
39
19/21
00
02
22
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6659
DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH
MANDAL
VILLAGE
SURVEY NO.
AREA
Hectare
Are
Sq. Mt.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
CHIPURUPALLE
CHINANADIPALLI
19/22
00
03
70
19/23
00
01
64
19/28
00
00
77
19/27
00
02
99
19/29
00
00
26
19/30
00
01
42
19/31
00
00
53
19/26
00
02
43
20/2
00
00
18
21/6
00
03
86
21/7
00
04
04
21/8
00
00
22
21/10
00
02
47
21/11
00
00
41
21/15
00
02
71
21/12
00
00
36
21/16
00
00
32
21/17
00
13
86
21/21
00
00
34
21/20
00
00
10
7/15
00
00
75
25/1
00
07
96
26/3
00
11
24
26/2
00
28
92
26/1
00
03
33
27/1
00
10
96
27/2
00
04
07
27/9
00
01
40
27/8
00
00
10
CHIPURUPALLI
ITKARLAPALLI
168/18
00
09
28
168/22
00
00
13
168/23
00
03
66
168/30
00
01
45
168/31
00
00
10
168/27
00
03
99
168/26
00
00
88
168/28
00
00
60
168/24
00
03
61
168/25
00
00
10
168/10
00
10
92
169/7
00
00
36
169/6
00
02
36
169/2
00
05
74
169/3
00
01
05
169/4
00
00
26
6660
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH
MANDAL
VILLAGE
SURVEY NO.
AREA
Hectare
Are
Sq. Mt.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
CHIPURUPALLI
ITKARLAPALLI
169/1
00
01
99
166/14
00
01
39
166/13
00
02
89
166/15
00
00
81
166/16
00
05
93
166/4
00
00
10
166/3
00
02
45
166/2
00
01
51
166/17
00
01
58
166/1
00
00
22
166/18
00
04
10
165/14
00
02
07
165/15
00
02
64
165/16
00
02
19
165/17
00
02
30
165/6
00
07
09
165/5
00
02
32
165/18
00
00
10
165/19
00
04
34
165/20
00
04
40
165/22
00
01
24
164/24
00
06
61
164/21
00
03
17
164/20
00
02
88
164/19
00
03
04
164/18
00
03
08
164/16
00
08
04
156/26
00
16
66
156/23
00
03
63
156/22
00
01
32
156/25
00
05
19
156/13
00
06
94
156/12
00
15
08
156/11
00
00
50
155/45
00
04
33
155/23
00
02
19
155/17
00
03
27
155/16
00
02
05
155/14
00
01
62
154/7
00
00
32
154/6
00
02
54
154/5
00
03
77
154/3
00
03
05
154/2
00
04
23
154/1
00
04
28
153/20
00
00
10
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6661
DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH
MANDAL
VILLAGE
SURVEY NO.
AREA
Hectare
Are
Sq. Mt.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
CHIPURUPALLI
ITKARLAPALLI
153/19
00
01
13
153/18
00
02
50
153/17
00
02
24
153/16
00
02
71
152/3
00
11
94
150/13
00
07
19
150/6
00
11
04
150/7
00
01
82
177/3
00
06
19
177/2
00
16
64
177/1
00
07
88
178/1
00
03
90
176/3
00
11
17
176/2
00
07
61
176/1
00
22
51
147/3
00
34
43
CHIPURUPALLI
POTAYYAVALASA
78/4
00
19
96
78/3
00
21
48
76/2
00
21
85
76/1
00
02
34
70/4
00
08
66
72/2
00
22
74
72/3
00
03
36
72/4
00
04
13
CHIPURUPALLE
PARLA
154/15
00
29
21
155/6
00
01
65
163/2
00
04
50
162/23
00
00
77
162/22
00
00
43
162/19
00
00
67
162/18
00
00
95
161/17
00
01
48
161/16
00
03
05
162/14
00
01
26
162/13
00
00
81
161/9
00
01
45
162/10
00
00
86
162/9
00
01
11
161/8
00
00
77
161/5
00
02
55
161/4
00
02
71
161/2
00
00
79
161/1
00
07
54
160/19
00
01
20
6662
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH
MANDAL
VILLAGE
SURVEY NO.
AREA
Hectare
Are
Sq. Mt.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
CHIPURUPALLE
PARLA
160/20
00
01
17
160/21
00
00
97
160/14
00
00
79
160/15
00
02
25
160/9
00
01
19
160/10
00
01
11
160/5
00
01
83
160/3
00
00
53
160/4
00
02
78
100/28
00
00
91
100/26
00
00
92
184/2
00
03
83
184/1
00
03
78
185/15
00
02
00
185/16
00
03
05
185/13
00
00
32
185/12
00
04
98
185/11
00
05
96
185/4
00
03
07
185/3
00
00
93
185/2
00
00
82
185/1
00
01
08
189/18
00
00
50
186
00
06
59
189/12
00
05
75
188/2
00
02
86
188/5
00
00
38
188/7
00
00
65
188/8
00
00
48
188/9
00
00
77
188/1
00
05
42
189/11
00
00
86
191/17
00
05
08
191/16
00
00
64
191/14
00
01
55
191/13
00
02
29
191/12
00
01
15
191/3
00
08
02
192/19
00
02
17
192/8
00
04
37
192/18
00
00
53
192/17
00
01
19
192/11
00
02
97
192/12
00
01
93
192/10
00
03
28
192/4
00
00
10
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6663
DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH
MANDAL
VILLAGE
SURVEY NO.
AREA
Hectare
Are
Sq. Mt.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
CHIPURUPALLE
PARLA
192/3
00
00
12
192/2
00
00
88
192/13
00
01
71
192/1
00
01
94
193/3
00
00
16
193/2
00
00
96
193/1
00
00
64
78/15
00
00
10
GARIVIDI
DUMMIDA
179/16
00
03
48
179/12
00
07
06
179/13
00
00
13
179/10
00
01
21
175/19
00
05
63
176/10
00
01
57
176/9
00
04
04
176/8
00
04
72
176/7
00
02
67
176/6
00
09
87
176/4
00
13
10
60
00
03
47
176/3
00
15
67
165/4
00
10
39
165/5
00
02
40
165/2
00
00
12
165/6
00
02
05
165/7
00
14
22
165/12
00
04
79
165/13
00
00
10
164/25
00
02
67
164/31
00
04
86
164/30
00
06
53
164/29
00
02
96
164/11
00
00
26
163/5
00
00
26
163/4
00
07
79
163/2
00
00
10
163/3
00
00
79
69/16
00
04
20
70/1
00
15
02
70/5
00
04
29
70/9
00
00
62
70/6
00
00
10
68/1
00
00
94
67/7
00
02
32
67/6
00
11
85
6664
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH
MANDAL
VILLAGE
SURVEY NO.
AREA
Hectare
Are
Sq. Mt.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
GARIVIDI
DUMMIDA
66/6
00
01
18
66/3
00
02
99
66/1
00
07
80
66/4
00
01
68
85/5
00
00
51
85/2
00
09
16
85/3
00
00
66
85/7
00
07
56
85/9
00
01
49
85/10
00
00
20
85/8
00
04
61
85/11
00
08
14
85/13
00
02
01
95/16
01
02
28
95/15
00
02
32
95/14
00
04
52
95/17
00
01
10
96/2
00
06
85
96/3
00
02
13
96/4
00
00
18
96/8
00
04
27
96/7
00
00
10
96/9
00
05
67
96/14
00
00
58
96/13
00
05
57
96/12
00
00
22
96/19
00
09
01
97/1
00
05
75
97/2
00
05
20
97/3
00
10
34
101/11
00
02
82
101/35
00
14
13
101/36
00
02
09
101/28
00
00
82
101/29
00
00
10
101/27
00
02
57
101/26
00
01
94
101/24
00
04
15
101/23
00
02
16
100/20
00
02
56
100/19
00
00
14
100/7
00
00
25
100/8
00
03
84
100/9
00
03
99
100/11
00
00
16
100/12
00
02
87
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6665
DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH
MANDAL
VILLAGE
SURVEY NO.
AREA
Hectare
Are
Sq. Mt.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
GARIVIDI
DUMMIDA
107/27
00
02
63
100/13
00
02
07
107/28
00
02
47
107/29
00
01
39
107/18
00
00
52
107/15
00
02
89
107/16
00
01
77
107/13
00
02
00
107/12
00
03
64
107/11
00
02
84
130/19
00
00
10
107/9
00
00
95
130/14
00
10
58
107/4
00
01
78
107/3
00
05
34
129/1
00
00
10
108
00
24
54
127/2
00
04
64
127/3
00
04
74
GURLA
SADANANDAPURAM
73/8
00
00
88
73/5
00
01
10
GURLA
NAGALLAVALASA
86/15
00
00
10
87/20
00
06
21
87/22
00
00
40
87/21
00
01
65
87/18
00
06
63
87/19
00
00
30
87/16
00
00
36
87/25
00
00
84
87/17
00
05
98
87/2
00
03
25
84/29
00
02
26
84/31
00
00
59
84/30
00
00
70
84/27
00
00
27
84/28
00
05
29
84/25
00
02
85
84/24
00
00
10
82/1
00
05
54
83/2
00
21
51
83/5
00
01
26
83/4
00
01
93
83/3
00
01
39
56
00
06
00
6666
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH
MANDAL
VILLAGE
SURVEY NO.
AREA
Hectare
Are
Sq. Mt.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
GURLA
NAGALLAVALASA
54/13
00
08
77
54/12
00
00
35
55/11
00
01
30
55/10
00
13
20
55/9
00
00
94
55/8
00
10
00
55/12
00
01
67
55/13
00
00
24
43
00
03
37
42/10
00
23
10
42/6
00
01
30
42/5
00
01
87
41/14
00
04
24
41/12
00
02
57
41/11
00
02
26
41/6
00
02
38
41/1
00
02
69
40/28
00
04
02
40/23
00
02
35
40/16
00
01
27
40/15
00
00
90
40/9
00
01
45
40/8
00
00
43
39/11
00
00
17
39/8
00
00
10
39/12
00
05
04
39/22
00
00
45
39/23
00
00
53
39/13
00
01
80
39/14
00
00
19
39/5
00
02
66
39/4
00
00
19
39/3
00
01
59
37/24
00
05
31
37/15
00
04
94
37/14
00
02
82
37/13
00
02
65
37/6
00
02
81
37/5
00
01
24
62/2
00
00
10
62/1
00
02
45
34/19
00
00
46
34/15
00
00
78
34/13
00
01
10
34/10
00
00
55
34/9
00
00
10
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6667
DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH
MANDAL
VILLAGE
SURVEY NO.
AREA
Hectare
Are
Sq. Mt.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
GURLA
NAGALLAVALASA
65/11
00
03
21
65/1
00
06
15
65/9
00
03
50
65/8
00
00
55
65/7
00
08
21
65/2
00
04
74
65/6
00
02
31
65/3
00
02
80
29/1
00
03
02
29/10
00
01
14
29/11
00
04
34
29/12
00
03
94
29/13
00
01
40
29/15
00
04
50
29/16
00
05
26
29/18
00
07
84
29/17
00
00
49
66/2
00
02
76
66/3
00
01
75
66/4
00
00
10
66/1
00
00
91
GURLA
JAMMU
88/11
00
12
18
90/3
00
08
63
90/4
00
00
30
90/2
00
04
74
90/7
00
07
54
90/6
00
01
08
93/21
00
06
59
93/22
00
02
74
93/12
00
03
58
93/24
00
07
63
93/13
00
00
12
93/9
00
01
03
93/11
00
02
72
93/10
00
04
18
93/7
00
00
74
93/5
00
04
89
93/6
00
00
10
95/20
00
00
10
95/21
00
01
81
95/22
00
06
45
95/24
00
04
04
95/23
00
00
81
97/23
00
00
10
97/22
00
04
73
6668
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH
MANDAL
VILLAGE
SURVEY NO.
AREA
Hectare
Are
Sq. Mt.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
GURLA
JAMMU
97/12
00
03
53
97/21
00
00
56
97/11
00
01
39
97/13
00
01
34
97/10
00
00
10
97/14
00
05
00
97/15
00
01
19
97/7
00
03
67
97/6
00
05
08
97/3
00
03
33
97/2
00
00
54
275/3
00
00
27
275/2
00
01
38
275/1
00
06
12
275/10
00
00
93
270/22
00
00
22
270/23
00
02
83
270/26
00
01
40
270/24
00
00
10
270/27
00
01
96
270/28
00
05
52
270/25
00
00
69
270/10
00
01
73
269/12
00
04
96
269/11
00
01
05
269/14
00
00
32
269/10
00
04
62
269/9
00
04
08
269/8
00
00
30
269/5
00
01
86
269/7
00
01
52
296/6
00
01
15
269/4
00
00
10
268/4
00
02
20
268/3
00
02
79
268/2
00
04
22
268/1
00
04
40
101/13
00
07
57
113/2
00
09
84
112/5
00
00
68
112/8
00
07
47
112/10
00
08
40
112/9
00
03
09
111/2
00
00
10
111/1
00
05
56
111/3
00
01
84
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6669
DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH
MANDAL
VILLAGE
SURVEY NO.
AREA
Hectare
Are
Sq. Mt.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
GURLA
JAMMU
109/3
00
00
10
109/5
00
00
50
109/13
00
01
07
109/12
00
03
09
109/11
00
01
61
109/10
00
01
10
110/1
00
01
83
108/14
00
01
08
108/15
00
03
20
108/18
00
00
28
108/19
00
02
80
108/12
00
00
10
108/13
00
00
90
108/20
00
04
17
108/23
00
03
41
108/24
00
08
79
108/25
00
01
39
107/35
00
04
59
117/2
00
16
18
117/1
00
10
16
119/1
00
08
59
118/9
00
01
13
118/2
00
06
05
126/36
00
03
37
126/35
00
02
25
126/34
00
02
70
126/9
00
02
74
126/8
00
00
10
123/6
00
00
10
123/5
00
00
68
123/1
00
06
69
123/2
00
00
10
125
00
05
30
151/11
00
01
50
151/14
00
02
00
151/15
00
00
40
151/12
00
02
55
151/10
00
01
70
151/6
00
08
40
152/8
00
02
23
152/1
00
00
10
182/25
00
00
10
182/26
00
05
26
182/27
00
00
45
182/18
00
00
35
182/19
00
02
05
6670
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH
MANDAL
VILLAGE
SURVEY NO.
AREA
Hectare
Are
Sq. Mt.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
GURLA
JAMMU
182/17
00
02
27
182/11
00
01
00
182/9
00
00
10
182/10
00
02
00
182/12
00
02
71
182/13
00
00
41
183/19
00
00
72
183/18
00
00
38
183/17
00
00
10
183/20
00
02
48
183/21
00
04
95
183/24
00
00
36
183/22
00
01
39
183/23
00
00
22
183/7
00
00
92
183/6
00
01
95
183/5
00
01
33
183/4
00
01
72
183/3
00
01
55
183/2
00
06
47
179/12
00
01
14
179/13
00
04
71
179/11
00
02
55
179/10
00
02
37
179/2
00
02
35
179/1
00
02
94
178/24
00
01
52
178/23
00
01
44
178/22
00
01
62
178/4
00
00
10
178/3
00
04
29
178/2
00
00
52
178/1
00
02
19
176/31
00
00
10
176/30
00
10
89
176/1
00
05
82
175/23
00
00
15
175/20
00
06
34
175/19
00
01
90
197/19
00
06
76
197/20
00
04
79
197/30
00
00
89
197/29
00
00
69
197/28
00
00
73
197/27
00
00
28
197/26
00
00
39
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6671
DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH
MANDAL
VILLAGE
SURVEY NO.
AREA
Hectare
Are
Sq. Mt.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
GURLA
JAMMU
197/25
00
00
36
197/24
00
00
25
197/23
00
03
85
196/19
00
14
35
196/25
00
09
19
196/20
00
00
66
196/21
00
01
55
196/24
00
00
20
196/23
00
00
35
196/22
00
00
54
209/2
00
01
99
211/19
00
01
71
211/18
00
00
40
211/7
00
13
43
211/17
00
00
16
211/6
00
00
10
211/8
00
00
19
211/16
00
00
10
211/10
00
02
51
211/9
00
02
22
211/11
00
02
81
211/12
00
02
57
211/15
00
00
30
211/14
00
00
61
211/13
00
02
15
216/4
00
04
95
216/3
00
00
14
214/12
00
00
10
214/11
00
00
65
214/10
00
01
03
214/9
00
04
80
214/7
00
00
28
214/8
00
07
49
GURLA
GARIDA
99/23
00
02
04
99/24
00
02
68
99/25
00
01
33
99/26
00
03
58
99/17
00
01
92
99/27
00
02
53
99/28
00
02
43
99/29
00
02
43
99/15
00
01
92
99/14
00
04
31
99/13
00
00
11
99/1
00
07
92
6672
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH
MANDAL
VILLAGE
SURVEY NO.
AREA
Hectare
Are
Sq. Mt.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
GURLA
GARIDA
76/6
00
05
45
76/7
00
00
55
76/9
00
15
63
75/14
00
01
83
75/12
00
03
61
75/13
00
00
62
75/11
00
05
60
75/1
00
00
16
79/15
00
00
10
79/14
00
02
06
79/12
00
01
94
79/11
00
00
10
80/20
00
06
96
80/18
00
00
32
80/12
00
02
90
80/13
00
03
31
80/5
00
02
65
80/4
00
05
34
80/2
00
01
05
31/8
00
02
10
31/7
00
00
93
32/19
00
00
10
32/18
00
01
46
32/17
00
02
45
32/16
00
01
32
30/20
00
00
60
30/19
00
00
10
30/16
00
02
65
30/15
00
02
68
30/14
00
00
10
30/6
00
01
19
30/7
00
09
41
30/5
00
01
26
30/4
00
02
33
30/3
00
00
85
34/34
00
00
98
34/32
00
01
73
34/31
00
01
74
34/23
00
02
10
34/22
00
00
20
34/24
00
01
59
34/25
00
00
10
34/14
00
00
73
34/15
00
01
15
34/16
00
00
19
34/9
00
01
53
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6673
DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH
MANDAL
VILLAGE
SURVEY NO.
AREA
Hectare
Are
Sq. Mt.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
GURLA
GARIDA
34/8
00
01
31
34/4
00
03
33
34/2
00
01
68
34/3
00
00
21
35/2
00
00
10
35/5
00
00
54
35/6
00
00
81
35/8
00
01
09
35/7
00
00
21
35/9
00
00
66
35/10
00
00
56
35/11
00
00
49
35/12
00
02
35
35/13
00
01
41
35/14
00
00
48
35/17
00
00
10
35/32
00
02
49
35/34
00
01
81
35/35
00
00
35
35/31
00
00
10
12/12
00
00
30
12/13
00
00
10
12/11
00
01
77
12/10
00
02
80
12/9
00
02
59
12/7
00
03
92
12/6
00
03
00
12/5
00
05
66
7/10
00
04
82
7/9
00
04
37
7/24
00
01
46
7/23
00
00
99
7/22
00
00
32
7/21
00
00
14
7/20
00
00
25
7/19
00
00
62
7/11
00
06
94
7/12
00
02
64
7/13
00
05
21
7/14
00
00
10
7/15
00
00
10
6/19
00
06
93
6/20
00
05
10
6/21
00
05
05
6/22
00
05
44
6/23
00
05
47
6674
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH
MANDAL
VILLAGE
SURVEY NO.
AREA
Hectare
Are
Sq. Mt.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
GURLA
GARIDA
6/24
00
02
81
3/3
00
01
92
3/9
00
00
20
3/8
00
01
55
3/7
00
02
99
3/6
00
07
20
3/5
00
02
80
3/11
00
04
00
3/12
00
00
10
2/8
00
08
95
2/4
00
07
65
2/5
00
06
16
2/6
00
01
12
2/12
00
00
10
2/13
00
11
70
GURLA
GORLAPETA_JAGANADHAPURAM
23/2
00
01
62
23/21
00
03
87
23/20
00
00
58
23/18
00
01
14
23/17
00
02
76
23/16
00
04
17
23/10
00
02
20
23/13
00
01
19
23/12
00
02
29
23/11
00
02
10
23/9
00
01
11
22/12
00
08
39
22/26
00
00
18
22/25
00
00
73
22/13
00
02
67
22/24
00
02
60
22/23
00
03
65
22/18
00
05
75
18/21
00
00
19
18/23
00
00
40
18/22
00
03
34
13/13
00
03
81
14/8
00
02
90
14/7
00
05
42
14/6
00
07
63
14/3
00
08
11
14/2
00
10
31
14/1
00
00
59
15/1
00
07
77
11/16
00
02
57
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6675
DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH
MANDAL
VILLAGE
SURVEY NO.
AREA
Hectare
Are
Sq. Mt.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
GURLA
GORLAPETA_JAGANADHAPURAM
11/15
00
21
61
11/14
00
00
10
GURLA
KELLA
34/1
00
03
30
33/2
00
30
05
7
00
41
17
8/18
00
02
52
8/21
00
19
06
8/25
00
08
32
8/24
00
00
87
8/20
00
06
85
8/19
00
00
29
13/23
00
00
20
13/22
00
08
90
13/21
00
00
57
13/20
00
04
87
13/17
00
09
30
13/16
00
03
39
13/15
00
05
38
13/1
00
04
38
13/2
00
00
10
347/20
00
05
56
346/2
00
07
69
346/1
00
00
45
346/3
00
11
01
346/4
00
11
90
346/7
00
00
65
346/6
00
01
72
346/5
00
06
57
346/8
00
01
20
14/10
00
06
47
14/9
00
00
10
GURLA
GOSADA
24/16
00
00
10
24/17
00
08
46
24/18
00
04
21
24/20
00
00
86
24/19
00
06
71
24/8
00
02
96
24/9
00
04
49
24/10
00
02
36
25/1
00
01
38
21/14
00
03
00
21/10
00
07
07
21/9
00
01
42
21/8
00
00
10
6676
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH
MANDAL
VILLAGE
SURVEY NO.
AREA
Hectare
Are
Sq. Mt.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
GURLA
GOSADA
21/5
00
01
98
21/6
00
02
00
21/1
00
04
91
20/12
00
03
88
20/10
00
04
42
20/9
00
01
37
20/5
00
03
39
19/2
00
05
61
19/1
00
13
54
19/4
00
00
56
16/1
00
07
51
16/5
00
03
28
16/3
00
06
70
16/4
00
00
10
15/6
00
05
30
15/5
00
01
83
15/3
00
00
15
15/8
00
07
34
15/9
00
04
40
15/15
00
00
25
15/14
00
01
49
15/12
00
00
89
57/5
00
03
16
57/6
00
03
40
57/7
00
03
56
57/10
00
01
50
57/12
00
04
04
57/9
00
01
27
57/13
00
05
05
57/14
00
00
29
64/2
00
01
28
64/5
00
05
23
64/8
00
05
46
65/1
00
10
72
65/2
00
11
90
66/3
00
04
68
66/2
00
00
10
66/4
00
02
67
66/5
00
04
73
66/6
00
04
15
66/17
00
00
90
66/16
00
04
67
66/15
00
00
90
66/13
00
01
73
68/9
00
03
08
68/8
00
03
93
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6677
DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH
MANDAL
VILLAGE
SURVEY NO.
AREA
Hectare
Are
Sq. Mt.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
GURLA
GOSADA
68/7
00
06
76
68/4
00
03
53
68/3
00
06
31
68/5
00
00
39
68/6
00
00
92
69/1
00
01
79
GURLA
KALAVACHERLA
60/6
00
00
46
60/7
00
01
87
60/8
00
02
83
60/11
00
02
42
60/9
00
01
13
60/3
00
00
17
60/10
00
01
22
62/4
00
00
10
62/5
00
02
82
62/6
00
01
46
62/7
00
00
95
62/8
00
03
56
62/9
00
01
85
29/14
00
03
99
29/15
00
04
53
29/13
00
00
81
29/12
00
00
55
29/11
00
00
54
29/16
00
02
83
29/17
00
00
10
29/10
00
02
71
29/32
00
00
10
29/9
00
02
55
29/8
00
04
96
29/3
00
04
22
29/33
00
00
10
29/2
00
02
68
29/1
00
02
94
30/21
00
00
60
30/20
00
01
00
30/19
00
01
04
30/18
00
01
71
30/14
00
00
38
30/17
00
02
91
30/16
00
03
14
30/15
00
03
10
30/6
00
03
63
30/4
00
03
49
30/3
00
01
54
6678
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH
MANDAL
VILLAGE
SURVEY NO.
AREA
Hectare
Are
Sq. Mt.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
GURLA
KALAVACHERLA
28/2
00
01
66
28/1
00
04
22
32/8
00
02
90
32/7
00
00
23
32/9
00
01
54
32/10
00
01
94
32/11
00
02
24
32/12
00
00
10
32/6
00
02
77
32/5
00
00
45
32/3
00
02
79
32/2
00
04
43
34/14
00
00
59
34/10
00
00
58
34/9
00
02
38
34/8
00
01
36
34/7
00
01
60
34/2
00
02
06
34/1
00
04
34
37/7
00
05
21
37/4
00
05
61
37/9
00
00
30
37/10
00
00
35
37/11
00
00
44
37/2
00
00
10
37/3
00
04
34
37/12
00
04
24
38
00
03
55
39/6
00
00
47
39/7
00
02
24
39/5
00
08
87
39/8
00
00
10
39/3
00
00
29
39/10
00
06
27
39/11
00
02
64
39/13
00
00
54
39/12
00
04
73
2/10
00
00
36
1/3
00
20
37
2/6
00
03
85
2/7
00
05
89
GURLA
KOTTA GANDREDU
92/3
00
10
90
86/1
00
00
42
63/8
00
03
62
63/9
00
00
31
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6679
DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH
MANDAL
VILLAGE
SURVEY NO.
AREA
Hectare
Are
Sq. Mt.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
GURLA
KOTTA GANDREDU
64/22
00
00
32
64/21
00
01
49
64/20
00
04
57
64/15
00
15
90
64/5
00
00
39
64/3
00
02
62
64/2
00
00
26
65/5
00
08
61
48/16
00
12
10
48/17
00
03
74
48/3
00
00
69
48/1
00
05
73
31/30
00
04
32
31/23
00
06
01
31/12
00
01
80
31/11
00
03
52
31/25
00
00
17
31/9
00
00
12
31/10
00
01
09
31/4
00
01
91
31/3
00
01
28
31/2
00
00
10
34/4
00
03
09
34/5
00
00
97
34/6
00
03
01
34/3
00
02
59
34/2
00
02
76
34/1
00
10
80
GURLA
ANANDAPURAM END BIT
194/2
00
07
78
194/3
00
00
83
194/4
00
00
68
194/5
00
00
81
194/6
00
01
48
194/1
00
03
35
195/5
00
00
67
195/4
00
00
82
195/3
00
00
34
195/6
00
01
32
195/7
00
02
51
195/2
00
00
25
195/10
00
17
62
195/9
00
00
10
195/11
00
00
47
197/18
00
00
10
197/19
00
02
16
6680
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH
MANDAL
VILLAGE
SURVEY NO.
AREA
Hectare
Are
Sq. Mt.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
GURLA
ANANDAPURAM END BIT
197/15
00
00
62
197/14
00
47
77
197/13
00
01
32
197/6
00
03
09
197/9
00
01
33
197/7
00
04
24
197/5
00
00
32
197/8
00
03
15
197/1
00
11
74
198/2
00
00
10
200/4
00
18
00
200/3
00
07
54
200/1
00
02
23
199/12
00
00
17
199/9
00
17
00
184/1
00
28
78
184/6
00
01
07
KOTHAVALASA
NARAPAM
10
00
01
93
8/1
00
18
47
4/3
00
08
70
5/10
00
00
93
5/16
00
07
37
5/19
00
00
10
91/1
00
08
28
91/2
00
07
29
KOTHAVALASA
DEVADA
154/3
00
19
14
152/2
00
00
93
152/4
00
09
67
152/5
00
06
47
152/6
00
01
77
155/1
00
02
52
155/2
00
01
23
155/7
00
00
50
155/8
00
00
72
155/9
00
09
83
157/2
00
00
72
157/1
00
09
84
157/6
00
05
14
157/5
00
00
10
157/8
00
03
40
159/2
00
07
21
176/1
00
01
17
179/1
00
00
11
180/1
00
01
60
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6681
DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH
MANDAL
VILLAGE
SURVEY NO.
AREA
Hectare
Are
Sq. Mt.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
KOTHAVALASA
DEVADA
180/10
00
06
15
180/11
00
06
89
180/14
00
07
28
180/16
00
01
36
180/23
00
05
54
180/22
00
05
22
180/26
00
00
13
180/19
00
03
33
180/20
00
08
50
180/29
00
00
29
182/8
00
00
93
KOTHAVALASA
VIRABHADRA PURAM
61/1
00
06
45
61/2
00
00
53
61/3
00
06
55
61/4
00
07
02
61/6
00
02
35
61/13
00
07
15
61/9
00
01
84
61/10
00
01
63
61/11
00
01
38
61/12
00
01
90
59/2
00
04
55
59/7
00
11
10
63/5
00
06
87
63/6
00
06
16
63/8
00
00
10
63/10
00
00
10
63/15
00
06
71
58/7
00
00
10
64/3
00
00
10
64/6
00
00
35
65/1
00
05
35
65/3
00
06
17
65/4
00
00
15
66/5
00
00
71
KOTHAVALASA
SUNDARAYYA PETA
4/19
00
18
65
4/4
00
00
42
4/5
00
01
28
4/6
00
05
19
4/14
00
05
09
4/17
00
00
40
4/16
00
01
01
4/15
00
04
36
4/21
00
04
59
6682
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH
MANDAL
VILLAGE
SURVEY NO.
AREA
Hectare
Are
Sq. Mt.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
KOTHAVALASA
SUNDARAYYA PETA
26/3
00
02
59
26/2
00
06
28
26/4
00
02
82
7/23
00
00
60
7/24
00
05
81
7/19
00
00
96
7/18
00
00
66
7/26
00
01
89
7/27
00
00
63
7/35
00
00
62
7/34
00
04
49
7/36
00
04
43
7/38
00
02
75
7/17
00
00
29
7/39
00
00
95
7/15
00
01
09
7/41
00
02
95
7/40
00
00
57
24/2
00
01
37
24/3
00
00
88
24/4
00
00
30
24/1
00
01
15
24/5
00
00
78
24/7
00
00
30
24/15
00
06
41
24/28
00
01
85
24/29
00
03
01
24/27
00
00
64
24/37
00
03
82
24/39
00
00
10
24/35
00
01
02
24/36
00
00
76
24/38
00
00
96
20/4
00
00
17
20/5
00
10
96
20/9
00
00
10
20/6
00
01
15
20/7
00
00
82
20/8
00
00
57
22/1
00
01
38
22/3
00
02
48
21/1
00
02
78
21/3
00
00
10
21/2
00
08
69
21/21
00
04
08
21/27
00
02
80
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6683
DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH
MANDAL
VILLAGE
SURVEY NO.
AREA
Hectare
Are
Sq. Mt.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
KOTHAVALASA
SUNDARAYYA PETA
21/28
00
00
40
21/30
00
03
75
21/31
00
07
77
21/38
00
00
33
40/16
00
09
81
40/18
00
00
21
40/23
00
04
17
40/28
00
00
10
40/25
00
02
22
40/27
00
02
08
40/29
00
05
41
41/20
00
00
21
41/19
00
15
91
41/22
00
00
10
41/27
00
03
60
41/28
00
00
64
41/29
00
00
10
42/3
00
00
10
50/19
00
03
51
50/23
00
00
49
48/1
00
00
24
48/2
00
03
12
48/3
00
04
05
48/4
00
00
37
48/20
00
00
74
48/19
00
06
34
KOTHAVALASA
CHIPURUVALASA
116
00
03
02
113/4
00
03
50
113/10
00
21
05
112/2
00
06
35
108/5
00
01
70
108/6
00
07
45
108/7
00
00
24
108/19
00
00
15
108/17
00
03
30
108/18
00
00
10
108/16
00
01
14
108/15
00
04
06
108/13
00
01
22
108/12
00
00
15
41/6
00
01
00
41/23
00
00
86
41/24
00
01
88
41/16
00
00
10
41/27
00
00
76
6684
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH
MANDAL
VILLAGE
SURVEY NO.
AREA
Hectare
Are
Sq. Mt.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
KOTHAVALASA
CHIPURUVALASA
41/29
00
03
95
41/37
00
04
04
41/36
00
00
51
41/38
00
00
84
42/13
00
00
92
106/1
00
00
10
106/2
00
02
37
106/22
00
02
72
106/19
00
01
32
106/23
00
00
29
106/24
00
00
65
106/20
00
01
28
106/17
00
00
10
106/16
00
02
76
106/29
00
01
12
106/15
00
02
51
106/37
00
02
90
106/36
00
00
10
106/38
00
01
69
106/12
00
00
82
106/41
00
02
01
98/1
00
05
65
98/2
00
01
51
98/3
00
01
14
98/7
00
00
52
98/9
00
13
46
98/6
00
00
38
98/10
00
00
45
98/11
00
02
53
98/12
00
00
51
98/13
00
04
28
97/10
00
00
34
97/1
00
07
55
97/8
00
00
10
97/9
00
01
16
97/7
00
00
10
97/11
00
03
66
97/12
00
03
17
97/13
00
01
91
97/14
00
00
56
97/20
00
00
10
95/5
00
01
10
95/4
00
00
61
106/31
00
00
10
106/25
00
00
10
97/5
00
00
10
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6685
DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH
MANDAL
VILLAGE
SURVEY NO.
AREA
Hectare
Are
Sq. Mt.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
KOTHAVALASA
CHIPURUVALASA
41/15
00
00
10
108/22
00
00
10
106/11
00
00
10
96/16
00
00
10
KOTHAVALASA
GULIVINDADA
28/8
00
05
98
27/2
00
00
42
27/4
00
04
61
27/7
00
15
43
27/8
00
01
57
27/9
00
00
93
25/1
00
02
15
25/3
00
10
31
25/7
00
03
70
25/5
00
00
86
25/6
00
00
74
25/9
00
03
12
24/2
00
00
12
24/3
00
00
92
24/14
00
00
10
24/13
00
02
32
24/16
00
00
10
24/17
00
04
20
24/9
00
00
81
38/1
00
00
30
38/2
00
12
74
38/9
00
02
88
38/7
00
00
10
38/10
00
01
20
38/8
00
10
91
37/8
00
12
98
37/7
00
00
10
37/9
00
00
26
37/11
00
00
29
37/13
00
00
13
37/14
00
06
68
37/17
00
10
19
36/7
00
01
30
41/1
00
07
12
41/2
00
00
24
41/14
00
08
82
41/18
00
00
68
41/19
00
10
66
44/33
00
07
16
43/1
00
09
21
43/3
00
04
32
6686
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH
MANDAL
VILLAGE
SURVEY NO.
AREA
Hectare
Are
Sq. Mt.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
KOTHAVALASA
GULIVINDADA
51/8
00
03
65
51/10
00
00
95
52/1
00
01
39
52/2
00
13
48
53/1
00
01
59
55/8
00
12
45
55/6
00
00
41
55/7
00
00
23
55/10
00
06
33
55/11
00
02
30
54/9
00
00
98
54/11
00
06
38
31/2
00
00
76
61/11
00
02
39
61/5
00
03
71
61/15
00
02
56
61/16
00
06
30
60/3
00
04
48
60/5
00
00
50
60/4
00
01
83
60/7
00
02
36
60/6
00
01
65
60/13
00
04
95
KOTTAVALASA
DANDERU
3/1
00
01
34
3/20
00
00
10
3/22
00
03
82
3/23
00
00
10
3/27
00
04
42
3/28
00
05
43
3/26
00
02
12
8/2
00
14
15
7/1
00
03
18
39/2
00
01
22
39/11
00
06
90
39/8
00
00
10
39/9
00
04
92
41/4
00
00
27
41/14
00
08
47
41/13
00
04
14
41/15
00
01
37
41/16
00
06
86
46
00
28
31
47/3
00
01
00
47/8
00
21
61
47/9
00
07
69
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6687
DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH
MANDAL
VILLAGE
SURVEY NO.
AREA
Hectare
Are
Sq. Mt.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
KOTTAVALASA
DANDERU
47/11
00
09
83
KOTHAVALASA
SANTAPALEM
16/1
00
50
99
16/2
00
34
09
15/3
00
00
39
19
00
39
35
20
00
26
46
25
00
29
88
24
00
31
32
[F. No. R-11025(11)252/2017/OR-I/E-21033]
NOAS KINDO, Under Secy.
शुि – पतर्
नई िदल् ली, 7 िदसम् बर, 2018
का. आ.1759 .—पेटर्ोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइंस (भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न) अिधिनयम, 1962
(1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उप-धारा (1) ᳇ारा पर्दत शिक्तयᲂ का पर्योग करते हुए, कᱶदर् सरकार पेटर्ोिलयम और पर्ाकृितक
गैस मंतर्ालय मᱶ भारत सरकार की अिधसूचना के का. आ. संख्या 186 िदनांक 30/01/2018, भारत के सा᳙ािहक राजपतर्
संख्या 5, िदनांक 28/01/2018 से 03/02/2018 के भाग II, धारा 3, उप-धारा (ii) मᱶ 1087-1088 पृ᳧ पर पर्कािशत, मᱶ
िन᳜िलिखत संशोधन करता है अथार्त्: —
उक्त अिधसूचना मᱶ,
"केन्दर्ीय सरकार को ऐसा पर्तीत होता है िक लोक िहत मᱶ यह आवश्यक है िक हल्दीया - बरौनी पाइपलाइन पािरयोजना के
अन्तगर्त पेटर्ोिलयम पदाथᲃ के पिरवहन हेतु पि᳟म बंगाल राज्य के हल्दीया िरफ़ाइनरी से िबहार राज्य के बरौनी िरफ़ाइनरी
तक इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड ᳇ारा पाइपलाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए;" और
"शर्ी िब᳡नाथ समाजदार, सक्षम पर्ािधकारी, इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड, (पाइपलाइन िडवीजन), 18" हिल्दया
बरौनी पर्ॉडक्ट पाइपलाइन, डाकघर – दुईल्या, आन्दुल – मौरी, मौरीगर्ाम, हावड़ा -711302 (पि᳟म बंगाल) "
संख्याᲐ और शब्दᲂ के स्थान पर,
"केन्दर्ीय सरकार को ऐसा पर्तीत होता है िक लोकिहत मᱶ यह आवश्यक िक कच्चे तेल के पिरवहन के िलए एक पाइपलाइन,
हिल्दया-बरौनी पाइपलाइन िसस्टम्स पिरयोजना के तहत, पि᳟म बंगाल राज्य मᱶ हिल्दया से िबहार राज्य मᱶ बरौनी तक,
इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड ᳇ारा पाइपलाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए" और
"शर्ी िव᳡नाथ समझदार, सक्षम पर्ािधकारी, इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड, हिल्दया-बरौनी पाइपलाइन िसस्टम्स
पिरयोजना, डाकघर – दुईल्या, आन्दुल – मौरी, मौरीगर्ाम, हावड़ा -711302 (पि᳟म बंगाल)" पढ़ा जाए।
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)22/2018-ओ.आर-I/ई-27779]
नोवस िकन् डो, अवर सिचव
6688
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ERRATUM
New Delhi, the 7th December, 2018
S.O.1759 .— In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals
pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby makes the
following amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, S. O.
number 186 dated 30/01/2018, published at page 1090 in Part II, section 3, Sub-section (ii) of the weekly Gazette of
India No.5, dated 28/01/2018 to 03/02/2018, namely:-
In the said notification, for the numbers and words,
“Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of
Petroleum Products from Haldia Refinery in the state of West Bengal to Barauni Refinery in the State of Bihar a pipeline
should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited” and
“Shri Biswanath Samajder, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Pipeline Division, 18” Haldia Barauni
Product Pipeline, P.O. Duilya, Andul-Mouri, Mourigram, Howrah-711302( West Bengal)”
the numbers and words,
“Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of
crude oil, a pipeline from Haldia in the state of West Bengal to Barauni in the State of Bihar under Haldia-Barauni
Pipeline Systems Project, should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited” and
“Shri Biswanath Samajder, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Haldia-Barauni Pipeline Systems
Project, P.O. Duilya, Andul-Mouri, Mourigram, Howrah-711302 ( West Bengal)”
shall be substituted.
[F. No. R-11025(11)22/2018-OR-I/E-27779]
NOAS KINDO, Under Secy.
शुि-पतर्
नई िदल्ली, 7 िदसम् बर, 2018
का. आ.1760 .— पेटर्ोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइंस (भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न) अिधिनयम, 1962
(1962 का 50) की धारा 3 िक उप-धारा (1) ᳇ारा पर्दत शिक्तयᲂ का पर्योग करते हुए, कᱶदर् सरकार पेटर्ोिलयम और पर्ाकृितक
गैस मंतर्ालय मᱶ भारत सरकार की अिधसूचना के का. आ. संख्या 187 िदनांक 30/01/2018, भारत के सा᳙ािहक राजपतर्
संख्या 5, िदनांक 28/01/2018 से 03/02/2018 के भाग II, धारा 3, उपधारा (ii) मᱶ 1092 पृ᳧ पर पर्कािशत, मᱶ
िन᳜िलिखत संशोधन करता है अथार्त्: -
उक्त अिधसूचना मᱶ,
"केन्दर्ीय सरकार को ऐसा पर्तीत होता है िक लोक िहत मᱶ यह आवश्यक है िक हल्दीया - बरौनी पाइपलाइन पािरयोजना के
अन्तगर्त पेटर्ोिलयम पदाथᲃ के पिरवहन हेतु पि᳟म बंगाल राज्य के हल्दीया िरफ़ाइनरी से िबहार राज्य के बरौनी िरफ़ाइनरी
तक इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड ᳇ारा पाइपलाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए; "और
"शर्ी िब᳡नाथ समाजदार, सक्षम पर्ािधकारी, इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड, (पाइपलाइन िडवीजन), 18" हिल्दया
बरौनी पर्ॉडक्ट पाइपलाइन, डाकघर – दुईल्या, आन्दुल – मौरी, मौरीगर्ाम, हावड़ा -711302 (पि᳟म बंगाल) "
संख्याᲐ और शब्दᲂ के स्थान पर,
"केन्दर्ीय सरकार को ऐसा पर्तीत होता है िक लोकिहत मᱶ यह आवश्यक िक कच्चे तेल के पिरवहन के िलए एक पाइपलाइन,
हिल्दया-बरौनी पाइपलाइन िसस्टम्स पिरयोजना के तहत, पि᳟म बंगाल राज्य मᱶ हिल्दया से िबहार राज्य मᱶ बरौनी तक,
इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड ᳇ारा पाइपलाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए" और
"शर्ी िव᳡नाथ समझदार, सक्षम पर्ािधकारी, इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड, हिल्दया-बरौनी पाइपलाइन िसस्टम्स
पिरयोजना, डाकघर – दुईल्या, आन्दुल – मौरी, मौरीगर्ाम, हावड़ा -711302 (पि᳟म बंगाल)"
पढ़ा जाए।
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)22/2018-ओ.आर-I/ई-27779]
नोवस िकन् डो, अवर सिचव
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6689
ERRATUM
New Delhi, the 7th December, 2018
S.O.1760 .—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals
pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby makes the
following amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas,
S. O. number 187 dated 30/01/2018, published at page 1152 in part II, section 3, sub-section (ii) of the weekly Gazette of
India No. 5, dated 28/01/2018 to 03/02/2018, namely:-
In the said notification, for the numbers and words,
“Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of
Petroleum Products from Haldia Refinery in the state of West Bengal to Barauni Refinery in the State of Bihar a pipeline
should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited” and
“Shri Biswanath Samajder, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Pipeline Division, 18” Haldia Barauni
Product Pipeline, P.O. Duilya, Andul-Mouri, Mourigram, Howrah-711302 (West Bengal)”
the numbers and words,
“Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of
crude oil, a pipeline from Haldia in the state of West Bengal to Barauni in the State of Bihar under Haldia-Barauni
Pipeline Systems Project, should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited” and
“Shri Biswanath Samajder, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Haldia-Barauni Pipeline Systems
Project, P.O. Duilya, Andul-Mouri, Mourigram, Howrah-711302 ( West Bengal)”
shall be substituted.
[F. No. R-11025(11)22/2018-OR-I/E-27779]
NOAS KINDO, Under Secy.
शुि – पतर्
नई िदल् ली, 7 िदसम् बर, 2018
का. आ.1761.—पेटर्ोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइंस (भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न) अिधिनयम, 1962
(1962 का 50) की धारा 3 िक उप धारा (1) ᳇ारा पर्दत शिक्तयᲂ का पर्योग करते हुए, कᱶदर् सरकार पेटर्ोिलयम और पर्ाकृितक
गैस मंतर्ालय मᱶ भारत सरकार की अिधसूचना के का. आ. संख्या 184 िदनांक 30/01/2018, भारत के सा᳙ािहक राजपतर्
संख्या 5, िदनांक 28/01/2018 से 03/02/2018 के भाग II, धारा 3, उपधारा (ii) मᱶ 943 पृ᳧ पर पर्कािशत, मᱶ िन᳜िलिखत
संशोधन करता है अथार्त्: -
उक्त अिधसूचना मᱶ,
"केन्दर्ीय सरकार को ऐसा पर्तीत होता है िक लोकिहत मᱶ यह आवश्यक है िक हल्दीया - बरौनी पाइपलाइन पािरयोजना के
अन्तगर्त पेटर्ोिलयम पदाथᲃ के पिरवहन हेतु पि᳟म बंगाल राज्य के हल्दीया िरफ़ाइनरी से िबहार राज्य के बरौनी िरफ़ाइनरी
तक इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड ᳇ारा पाइपलाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए; "और
"शर्ी िब᳡नाथ समाजदार, सक्षम पर्ािधकारी, इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड, (पाइपलाइन िडवीजन), 18" हिल्दया
बरौनी पर्ॉडक्ट पाइपलाइन, डाकघर – दुईल्या, आन्दुल – मौरी, मौरीगर्ाम, हावड़ा -711302 (पि᳟म बंगाल) "
संख्याᲐ और शब्दᲂ के स्थान पर,
6690
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
"केन्दर्ीय सरकार को ऐसा पर्तीत होता है िक लोकिहत मᱶ यह आवश्यक की कच्चे तेल के पिरवहन के िलए एक पाइपलाइन,
हिल्दया-बरौनी पाइपलाइन िसस्टम्स पिरयोजना के तहत, पि᳟म बंगाल राज्य मᱶ हिल्दया से िबहार राज्य मᱶ बरौनी तक,
इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड ᳇ारा पाइपलाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए "और
"शर्ी िव᳡नाथ समझदार, सक्षम पर्ािधकारी, इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड, हिल्दया-बरौनी पाइपलाइन िसस्टम्स
पिरयोजना, डाकघर – दुईल्या, आन्दुल – मौरी, मौरीगर्ाम, हावड़ा -711302 (पि᳟म बंगाल) "
पढ़ा जाए।
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)22/2018-ओ.आर-I/ई-27779]
नोवस िकन् डो, अवर सिचव
ERRATUM
New Delhi, 7th December, 2018
S.O.1761 .—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals
pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby makes the
following amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas,
S. O. number 184 dated 30/01/2018, published at pages 996-997 in part II, section 3, sub-section (ii) of the weekly
Gazette of India No.5, dated 28/01/2018 to 03/02/2018, namely:-
In the said notification, for the numbers and words,
“Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of
Petroleum Products from Haldia Refinery in the State of West Bengal to Barauni Refinery in the State of Bihar a pipeline
should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited” and
“Shri Biswanath Samajder, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Pipeline Division, 18” Haldia Barauni
Product Pipeline, P.O. Duilya, Andul-Mouri, Mourigram, Howrah-711302( West Bengal)”
the numbers and words,
“Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of
crude oil, a pipeline from Haldia in the State of West Bengal to Barauni in the State of Bihar under Haldia-Barauni
Pipeline Systems Project, should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited” and
“Shri Biswanath Samajder, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Haldia-Barauni Pipeline Systems
Project, P.O. Duilya, Andul-Mouri, Mourigram, Howrah-711302 ( West Bengal)”
shall be substituted.
[F. No. R-11025(11)22/2018-OR-I/E-27779]
NOAS KINDO, Under Secy.
शुि – पतर्
नई िदल् ली, 7 िदसम् बर, 2018
का. आ.1762.— पेटर्ोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइंस (भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न) अिधिनयम, 1962
(1962 का 50) की धारा 3 िक उप धारा (1) ᳇ारा पर्दत शिक्तयᲂ का पर्योग करते हुए, कᱶदर् सरकार पेटर्ोिलयम और पर्ाकृितक
गैस मंतर्ालय मᱶ भारत सरकार की अिधसूचना के का. आ. संख्या 185 िदनांक 30/01/2018, भारत के सा᳙ािहक राजपतर्
संख्या 5, िदनांक 28/01/2018 से 03/02/2018 के भाग II, धारा 3, उपधारा (ii) मᱶ 1032 पृ᳧ पर पर्कािशत, मᱶ
िन᳜िलिखत संशोधन करता है, अथार्त्: -
उक्त अिधसूचना मᱶ,
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6691
"केन्दर्ीय सरकार को ऐसा पर्तीत होता है िक लोक िहत मᱶ यह आवश्यक है िक हल्दीया - बरौनी पाइपलाइन पिरयोजना के
अन्तगर्त पेटर्ोिलयम पदाथᲃ के पिरवहन हेतु पि᳟म बंगाल राज्य के हल्दीया िरफ़ाइनरी से िबहार राज्य के बरौनी िरफ़ाइनरी
तक इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड ᳇ारा पाइपलाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए; " और
"शर्ी िब᳡नाथ समाजदार, सक्षम पर्ािधकारी, इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड, (पाइपलाइन िडवीजन), 18" हिल्दया
बरौनी पर्ॉडक्ट पाइपलाइन, डाकघर – दुईल्या, आन्दुल – मौरी, मौरीगर्ाम, हावड़ा -711302 (पि᳟म बंगाल) "
संख्याᲐ और शब्दᲂ के स्थान पर,
"केन्दर्ीय सरकार को ऐसा पर्तीत होता है िक लोकिहत मᱶ यह आवश्यक िक कच्चे तेल के पिरवहन के िलए एक पाइपलाइन,
हिल्दया-बरौनी पाइपलाइन िसस्टम्स पिरयोजना के तहत, पि᳟म बंगाल राज्य मᱶ हिल्दया से िबहार राज्य मᱶ बरौनी तक,
इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड ᳇ारा पाइपलाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए " और
"शर्ी िव᳡नाथ समझदार, सक्षम पर्ािधकारी, इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड, हिल्दया-बरौनी पाइपलाइन िसस्टम
िसस्टम्स, डाकघर – दुईल्या, आन्दुल – मौरी, मौरीगर्ाम, हावड़ा -711302 (पि᳟म बंगाल)"
पढ़ा जाए।
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)22/2018-ओ.आर-I/ई-27779]
नोवस िकन् डो, अवर सिचव
ERRATUM
New Delhi, the 7th December, 2018
S. O.1762 .—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals
pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby makes the
following amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas,
S. O. number 185 dated 30/01/2018, published at page 1065 in Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii) of the weekly Gazette
of India No. 5, dated 28/01/2018 to 03/02/2018, namely:-
In the said notification, for the numbers and words,
“Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of
Petroleum Products from Haldia Refinery in the State of West Bengal to Barauni Refinery in the State of Bihar a pipeline
should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited” and
“Shri Biswanath Samajder, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Pipeline Division, 18” Haldia Barauni
Product Pipeline, P.O. Duilya, Andul-Mouri, Mourigram, Howrah-711302 (West Bengal)”
the numbers and words,
“Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of
crude oil, a pipeline from Haldia in the State of West Bengal to Barauni in the State of Bihar under Haldia-Barauni
Pipeline Systems Project, should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited” and
“Shri Biswanath Samajder, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Haldia-Barauni Pipeline Systems
Project, P.O. Duilya, Andul-Mouri, Mourigram, Howrah-711302 ( West Bengal)”
shall be substituted.
[F. No. R-11025(11)22/2018/OR-I/E-27779]
NOAS KINDO, Under Secy.
6692
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
शुि – पतर्
नई िदल् ली, 7 िदसम् बर, 2018
का. आ.1763.—पेटर्ोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइंस (भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न) अिधिनयम, 1962
(1962 का 50) की धारा 3 िक उप धारा (1) ᳇ारा पर्दत शिक्तयᲂ का पर्योग करते हुए, कᱶदर् सरकार पेटर्ोिलयम और पर्ाकृितक
गैस मंतर्ालय मᱶ भारत सरकार की अिधसूचना के का. आ. संख्या 2846 िदनांक 31/10/2017, भारत के सा᳙ािहक राजपतर्
संख्या 51, िदनांक 17/12/2017 से 23/12/2017 के भाग II, धारा 3, उपधारा (ii) मᱶ 9526 पृ᳧ पर पर्कािशत, मᱶ
िन᳜िलिखत संशोधन करता है अथार्त्: -
उक्त अिधसूचना मᱶ,
"केन्दर्ीय सरकार को लोक िहत मे यह आवश्यक पर्तीत होता है िक पि᳟म बंगाल राज्य के हलिदया रीफ़ीनेरी से िबहार राज्य
के बरौनी तक इंिडयन ऑइल कापᲃरेशन िलिमटेड ᳇ारा एक पाइप लाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए;" और
"शर्ी अजय िसह बड़ाईक (झा. पर्. से.) सक्षम पर्ािधकारी, भूिम अजर्न अिधकारी, इंिडयन ऑइल कापᲃरेशन िलिमटेड, परदीप
हल्दीया दुगार्पुर एल॰ पी॰ जी॰ पाइप लाइन आगमेटᱶशन एवं 18” हल्दीया – बरौनी पर्ॉडक्ट पाइप लाइन पिरयोजना, देवघर
पैलस, तीसरा तल, वी॰ आई॰ पी॰ चौक देवघर – 814112 (झारखंड) "।
संख्याᲐ और शब्दᲂ के स्थान पर,
"केन्दर्ीय सरकार को ऐसा पर्तीत होता है िक लोक िहत मᱶ यह आवश्यक िक कच्चे तेल के पिरवहन के िलए एक पाइपलाइन,
हिल्दया-बरौनी पाइपलाइन िसस्टम्स पिरयोजना के तहत, पि᳟म बंगाल राज्य मᱶ हिल्दया से िबहार राज्य मᱶ बरौनी तक,
इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड ᳇ारा पाइपलाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए " और
"शर्ी अजय िसह बड़ाईक (झा. पर्. से.), सक्षम पर्ािधकारी, इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड, हिल्दया-बरौनी पाइपलाइन
िसस्टम पर्ोजेक्ट, देवघर पैलेस, तीसरा तल, वी॰आई॰पी चौक, देवघर -814112 (झारखंड)" ।
पढ़ा जाए।
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)21/2018-ओ.आर-I/ई-27764]
नोवस िकन् डो, अवर सिचव
ERRATUM
New Delhi, the 7th December, 2018
S.O.1763 .— In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals
pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby makes the
following amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas,
S. O. number 2846 dated 31/10/17, published at page 9571 in Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii) of the weekly Gazette of
India No. 51, dated 17/12/17 to 23/12/17, namely:-
In the said notification, for the numbers and words,
“Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of
Petroleum Products from Haldia Refinery in the State of West Bengal to Barauni Refinery in the State of Bihar a pipeline
should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited” and
“Shri Ajay Singh Baraik, JAS, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Pipeline Division, Augmentation
of Paradip Haldia Durgapur LPG Pipeline, And 18” Haldia Barauni Product Pipeline Projects, Pipeline, “Deoghar
Palace”,3rd Floor ,VIP Chowk, Deoghar-814112 (Jharkhand)”.
the numbers and words,
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6693
“Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of
crude oil, a pipeline from Haldia in the State of West Bengal to Barauni in the State of Bihar under Haldia-Barauni
Pipeline Systems Project, should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited” and
“Shri Ajay Singh Baraik, JAS, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Haldia-Barauni Pipeline Systems
Project, Deoghar Palace, 3rd Floor , VIP Chowk,Deoghar-814112 (Jharkhand)”
shall be substituted.
[F. No. R-11025(11)21/2018/OR-I/E-27764]
NOAS KINDO, Under Secy.
शुि–पतर्
नई िदल् ली, 7 िदसम् बर, 2018
का. आ.1764.—पेटर्ोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइंस (भूिम मे उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न) अिधिनयम, 1962
(1962 का 50) की धारा 3 िक उप धारा (1) ᳇ारा पर्दत शिक्तयᲂ का पर्योग करते हुए, कᱶदर् सरकार पेटर्ोिलयम और पर्ाकृितक
गैस मंतर्ालय मᱶ भारत सरकार की अिधसूचना के का. आ. संख्या 2845 िदनांक 31/10/2017, भारत के सा᳙ािहक राजपतर्
संख्या 51, िदनांक 17/12/2017 से 23/12/2017 के भाग II, धारा 3, उपधारा (ii) मᱶ 9426 पृ᳧ पर पर्कािशत, मᱶ
िन᳜िलिखत संशोधन करता है अथार्त्: -
उक्त अिधसूचना मᱶ,
" केन्दर्ीय सरकार को लोकिहत मे यह आवश्यक पर्तीत होता है िक पि᳟म बंगाल राज्य के हलिदया रीफ़ीनेरी से िबहार राज्य
के बरौनी तक इंिडयन ऑइल कापᲃरेशन िलिमटेड ᳇ारा एक पाइप लाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए;" और
"शर्ी अजय िसह बड़ाईक (झा. पर्. से.) सक्षम पर्ािधकारी, भूिम अजर्न अिधकारी, इंिडयन ऑइल कापᲃरेशन िलिमटेड, परदीप
हल्दीया दुगार्पुर एल॰ पी॰ जी॰ पाइप लाइन आगमेटᱶशन एवं 18” हल्दीया – बरौनी पर्ॉडक्ट पाइप लाइन पिरयोजना, देवघर
पैलस, तीसरा तल, वी॰ आई॰ पी॰ चौक देवघर – 814112 (झारखंड) "।
संख्याᲐ और शब्दᲂ के स्थान पर,
"केन्दर्ीय सरकार को ऐसा पर्तीत होता है िक लोकिहत मᱶ यह आवश्यक िक कच्चे तेल के पिरवहन के िलए एक पाइपलाइन,
हिल्दया-बरौनी पाइपलाइन िसस्टम्स पिरयोजना के तहत, पि᳟म बंगाल राज्य मᱶ हिल्दया से िबहार राज्य मᱶ बरौनी तक,
इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड ᳇ारा पाइपलाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए " और
"शर्ी अजय िसह बड़ाईक (झा॰ पर्॰ से॰), सक्षम पर्ािधकारी, इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड, हिल्दया-बरौनी पाइपलाइन
िसस्टम पर्ोजेक्ट, देवघर पैलेस, तीसरा तल, वी. आई. पी. चौक, देवघर -814112 (झारखंड)" ।
पढ़ा जाए।
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)21/2018-ओ.आर-I/ई-27764]
नोवस िकन् डो, अवर सिचव
6694
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ERRATUM
New Delhi, the 7th December, 2018
S.O.1764 .—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals
pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby makes the
following amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas,
S.O. number 2845 dated 31/10/17, published at page 9487 in Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii) of the weekly Gazette of
India No. 51, dated 17/12/17 to 23/12/17, namely:-
In the said notification, for the numbers and words,
“Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of
Petroleum Products from Haldia Refinery in the State of West Bengal to Barauni Refinery in the State of Bihar a pipeline
should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited” and
“Shri Ajay Singh Baraik, JAS, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Pipeline Division, Augmentation
of Paradip Haldia Durgapur LPG Pipeline, And 18” Haldia Barauni Product Pipeline Projects, Pipeline, “Deoghar
Palace”,3rd Floor ,VIP Chowk,Deoghar-814112 (Jharkhand)”.
the numbers and words,
“Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of
crude oil, a pipeline from Haldia in the State of West Bengal to Barauni in the State of Bihar under Haldia-Barauni
Pipeline Systems Project, should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited” and
“Shri Ajay Singh Baraik , JAS, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Haldia-Barauni Pipeline Systems
Project, Deoghar Palace, 3rd Floor ,VIP Chowk, Deoghar-814112 (Jharkhand)” .
shall be substituted.
[F. No. R-11025(11)21/2018/OR-I/E-27764]
NOAS KINDO, Under Secy.
नई िदल्ली, 11 िदसम् बर, 2018
का. आ.1765.—केन्दर्ीय सरकार को लोकिहत मᱶ यह आवश्यक पर्तीत होता है िक उᱫर पर्देश राज्य मᱶ टूण्डला
टिमनल से कानपुर टिमनल तक पेटर्ोिलयम उत्पादᲂ के पिरवहन के िलये इंिडयन ऑयलकापᲃरेशन िलिमटेड ᳇ारा पाइपलाइन
िबछाई जानी चािहए।
और केन्दर्ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन िबछाने के पर्योजन के िलये यह आवश्यक पर्तीत होता है िक ऐसी भूिम मᱶ
जो इस से उपाब अनुसूची मे विणत है, और िजसमᱶ उक्त पाइपलाइन िबछाई जाने का पर्स्ताव है, उपयोग के अिधकार का
अजर्न िकया जाए ।
अतः अब, केन्दर्ीय सरकार, पेटर्ोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न) अिधिनयम,
1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1) ᳇ारा पर्दᱫ शिक्तयो का पर्योग करते हुए उस भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार
का अजर्न करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ।
कोई ᳞िक्त, जो उक्त अनुसूची मᱶ विणत भूिम मᱶ िहतब है, उस तारीख से, िजसको इस अिधसूचना मᱶ युक्त भारत
के राजपतर् की पर्ितयाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हᱹ, इक्कीस िदन के भीतर, भूिम के नीचे पाइपलाइन िबछाए
जाने के िलए उसमᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार के संबंध मᱶ सक्षम पर्ािधकारी, इंिडयन ऑयल कापᲃरेशन िलिमटेड पाइपलाइन्स
पर्भाग, िनमार्ण कायार्लय, उᱫरी क्षेतर् पाइपलाइन्स, टूण्डला - गौिरया पाइपलाइन पिरयोजना, ई-160, पर्थम व ि᳇तीय तल,
कमला नगर, आगरा (यू.पी.) – 282004 को िलिखत रूप मᱶ आक्षेप भेज सकेगा।
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6695
अनुसूची
तह्सील – ताखा
िजला – इटावा
राज्य – उᱫर पर्देश
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
1.
आढरपुर
229
00
00
38
227
00
23
13
219
00
04
14
218
00
08
94
214
00
01
67
215
00
04
97
210
00
02
55
209
00
06
57
208
00
05
13
195
00
05
56
201
00
12
02
200
00
00
87
199
00
02
16
202
00
02
41
259
00
03
16
260
00
01
66
258
00
44
99
264
00
01
86
265
00
08
36
269
00
08
11
268
00
01
69
270
00
07
95
271
00
04
77
273
00
11
15
6696
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
आढरपुर
285
00
09
49
276
00
07
82
284
00
34
89
283
00
01
94
282
00
12
48
401
00
23
11
446
00
15
87
453
00
00
10
447
00
00
10
451
00
00
92
452
00
08
88
459
00
14
24
457
00
01
54
458
00
02
33
460
00
01
78
471
00
02
36
472
00
00
10
473
00
08
96
474
00
10
03
477
00
10
81
478
00
06
67
482
00
06
89
483
00
03
84
485
00
13
35
487
00
01
04
2.
रौरा
1094
00
02
18
1093
00
02
50
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6697
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
रौरा
1092
00
05
78
1090
00
00
28
1091
00
00
28
1089
00
14
25
1082
00
00
25
1083
00
16
54
1084
00
00
53
1079
00
00
37
1080
00
03
67
1075
00
17
33
1055
00
13
58
1054
00
08
58
1053
00
00
22
1042
00
01
91
1041
00
00
50
1040
00
00
21
1045
00
07
91
1038
00
12
64
1018
00
04
64
1014
00
20
81
1015
00
00
58
1003
00
00
36
997
00
00
10
1000
00
01
17
999
00
01
35
996
00
04
20
973
00
00
23
6698
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
रौरा
972
00
08
99
971
00
12
41
970
00
06
28
969
00
06
52
968
00
13
50
967
00
02
25
943
00
01
50
942
00
15
74
941
00
00
37
923
00
21
88
921
00
06
97
920
00
12
92
1469
00
01
17
1471
00
16
15
1556
00
03
42
1554
00
16
00
1557
00
04
02
1553
00
11
11
1558
00
06
30
1552
00
00
99
1598
00
05
26
1599
00
22
61
1600
00
00
27
1601
00
25
39
1588
00
00
57
1589
00
00
10
1585
00
00
10
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6699
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
रौरा (जारी)
1584
00
07
21
1583
00
01
12
1581
00
03
21
1582
00
02
15
1579
00
10
61
1580
00
00
39
1639
00
06
93
1640
00
07
22
1642
00
08
36
1643
00
13
21
1772
00
15
51
1777
00
09
84
1771
00
00
16
1769
00
00
10
1766
00
00
10
1778
00
00
10
1765
00
03
02
1780
00
05
72
1763
00
01
06
2084
00
05
07
2159
00
20
93
2157
00
00
17
2156
00
03
91
2125
00
15
76
2127
00
45
85
2146
00
00
89
2103
00
00
57
6700
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
रौरा
2102
00
00
10
2101
00
16
37
2131
00
00
36
3.
ककराही
414
00
00
88
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)20/2018-ओ.आर-I/ई-27595]
नोवस िकन् डो, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 11th December, 2018
S.O. 1765.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the
transportation of petroleum products from Tundla Terminal to Kanpur Terminal should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation
Limited. And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is
necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed to this notification;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and
Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby
declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty–one days from the date on
which the copies of this notification, as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the General Public, object
in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under the land to Competent Authority,
Indian Oil Corporation Limited (Pipelines Division), Construction Office, Northern Region Pipelines, Tundla-Gawria
Pipeline Project, E-160,1st & 2nd floor, Kamlanagar, Agra (U.P.) – 282 004.
SCHEDULE
Tehsil:- Takha
District :- Etawah
State :- Uttar Pradesh
Sl. No.
Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
1.
Aadharpur
229
00
00
38
227
00
23
13
219
00
04
14
218
00
08
94
214
00
01
67
215
00
04
97
210
00
02
55
209
00
06
57
208
00
05
13
195
00
05
56
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6701
Sl. No.
Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
Aadharpur (Contd.)
201
00
12
02
200
00
00
87
199
00
02
16
202
00
02
41
259
00
03
16
260
00
01
66
258
00
44
99
264
00
01
86
265
00
08
36
269
00
08
11
268
00
01
69
270
00
07
95
271
00
04
77
273
00
11
15
285
00
09
49
276
00
07
82
284
00
34
89
283
00
01
94
282
00
12
48
401
00
23
11
446
00
15
87
453
00
00
10
447
00
00
10
451
00
00
92
452
00
08
88
459
00
14
24
457
00
01
54
458
00
02
33
460
00
01
78
471
00
02
36
472
00
00
10
473
00
08
96
474
00
10
03
6702
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Sl. No.
Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
Aadharpur
477
00
10
81
478
00
06
67
482
00
06
89
483
00
03
84
485
00
13
35
487
00
01
04
2.
Raura
1094
00
02
18
1093
00
02
50
1092
00
05
78
1090
00
00
28
1091
00
00
28
1089
00
14
25
1082
00
00
25
1083
00
16
54
1084
00
00
53
1079
00
00
37
1080
00
03
67
1075
00
17
33
1055
00
13
58
1054
00
08
58
1053
00
00
22
1042
00
01
91
1041
00
00
50
1040
00
00
21
1045
00
07
91
1038
00
12
64
1018
00
04
64
1014
00
20
81
1015
00
00
58
1003
00
00
36
997
00
00
10
1000
00
01
17
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6703
Sl. No.
Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
Raura
999
00
01
35
996
00
04
20
973
00
00
23
972
00
08
99
971
00
12
41
970
00
06
28
969
00
06
52
968
00
13
50
967
00
02
25
943
00
01
50
942
00
15
74
941
00
00
37
923
00
21
88
921
00
06
97
920
00
12
92
1469
00
01
17
1471
00
16
15
1556
00
03
42
1554
00
16
00
1557
00
04
02
1553
00
11
11
1558
00
06
30
1552
00
00
99
1598
00
05
26
1599
00
22
61
1600
00
00
27
1601
00
25
39
1588
00
00
57
1589
00
00
10
1585
00
00
10
1584
00
07
21
1583
00
01
12
6704
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Sl. No.
Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
Raura
1581
00
03
21
1582
00
02
15
1579
00
10
61
1580
00
00
39
1639
00
06
93
1640
00
07
22
1642
00
08
36
1643
00
13
21
1772
00
15
51
1777
00
09
84
1771
00
00
16
1769
00
00
10
1766
00
00
10
1778
00
00
10
1765
00
03
02
1780
00
05
72
1763
00
01
06
2084
00
05
07
2159
00
20
93
2157
00
00
17
2156
00
03
91
2125
00
15
76
2127
00
45
85
2146
00
00
89
2103
00
00
57
2102
00
00
10
2101
00
16
37
2131
00
00
36
3.
Kakrahi
414
00
00
88
[F. No. R-11025(11)20/2018/OR-I/E-27595]
NOAS KINDO, Under Secy.
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6705
नई िदल्ली, 11 िदसम् बर, 2018
का. आ. 1766.— केन्दर्ीय सरकार को लोकिहत मᱶ यह आवश्यक पर्तीत होता है िक उᱫर पर्देश राज्य मᱶ टूण्डला
टिमनल से कानपुर टिमनल तक पेटर्ोिलयम उत्पादᲂ के पिरवहन के िलये इंिडयन ऑयल कापᲃरेशन िलिमटेड ᳇ारा पाइपलाइन
िबछाई जानी चािहए।
और केन्दर्ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन िबछाने के पर्योजन के िलये यह आवश्यक पर्तीत होता है िक ऐसी भूिम मᱶ
जो इससे उपाब अनुसूची मᱶ विणत है, और िजसमᱶ उक्त पाइपलाइन िबछाई जाने का पर्स्ताव है, उपयोग के अिधकार का
अजर्न िकया जाए ।
अतः अब, केन्दर्ीय सरकार, पेटर्ोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न) अिधिनयम,
1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1) ᳇ारा पर्दᱫ शिक्तयᲂ का पर्योग करते हुए उस भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार
का अजर्न करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ।
कोई ᳞िक्त, जो उक्त अनुसूची मᱶ विणत भूिम मᱶ िहतब है , उस तारीख से, िजसको इस अिधसूचना मᱶ युक्त भारत
के राजपतर् की पर्ितयाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हᱹ, इक्कीस िदन के भीतर, भूिम के नीचे पाइपलाइन िबछाए
जाने के िलए उसमᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार के संबंध मᱶ सक्षम पर्ािधकारी, इंिडयन ऑयल कापᲃरेशन िलिमटेड पाइपलाइन्स
पर्भाग, िनमार्ण कायार्लय, उᱫरी क्षेतर् पाइपलाइन्स, टूण्डला - गौिरया पाइपलाइन पिरयोजना, ई-160, पर्थम व ि᳇तीय तल,
कमला नगर, आगरा (यू.पी.) – 282004 को िलिखत रूप मᱶ आक्षेप भेज सकेगा।
अनुसूची
तहसील – भरथना
िजला – इटावा
राज्य – उᱫर पर्देश
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1.
नगला बहादुरपुर
132
00
04
06
134
00
01
76
142
00
15
18
133
00
00
49
141
00
05
28
143
00
03
66
144
00
00
20
151
00
00
82
153
00
00
44
166
00
01
99
165
00
03
27
167
00
00
17
नगला बहादुरपुर
169
00
00
24
170
00
12
68
161
00
04
04
6706
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
160
00
05
82
159
00
24
03
158
00
00
10
388
00
02
95
387
00
07
08
384
00
00
51
383
00
15
02
395
00
18
54
407
00
00
10
405
00
00
10
408
00
00
60
410
00
00
10
406
00
00
20
396
00
00
49
401
00
02
99
403
00
13
18
404
00
05
73
412
00
00
61
413
00
07
40
414
00
00
24
417
00
01
94
425
00
00
84
423
00
02
61
419
00
04
23
नगला बहादुरपुर
420
00
04
55
422
00
10
38
2.
सैफी
1400
00
00
28
1397
00
00
10
1405
00
05
06
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6707
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1406
00
06
81
1407
00
01
40
1411
00
11
33
1412
00
03
90
1417
00
06
05
1419
00
00
37
1424
00
08
61
1432
00
01
17
1431
00
07
29
1429
00
00
21
1430
00
09
96
1459
00
00
36
1453
00
27
40
1454
00
03
59
1455
00
03
64
1477
00
03
43
1476
00
03
77
1475
00
05
49
1482
00
01
36
1485
00
10
90
1515
00
00
72
1514
00
07
45
सैफी
1512
00
04
98
1511
00
05
99
1510
00
07
85
1501
00
17
55
1500
00
11
02
1499
00
00
33
1539
00
17
37
6708
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1542
00
00
38
1540
00
00
24
1544
00
16
76
1564
00
00
77
1543
00
01
71
1563
00
01
41
1497
00
02
91
1562
00
00
18
1566
00
07
47
1567
00
03
47
1560
00
00
36
1559
00
02
65
1570
00
01
99
1576
00
00
11
1571
00
01
93
1575
00
02
72
1573
00
03
24
1574
00
00
50
1583
00
06
71
1585
00
06
30
सैफी
1584
00
00
10
1590
00
01
46
1589
00
07
92
1593
00
01
93
1594
00
02
24
3.
नगला बुटहर
155
00
02
88
157
00
04
55
156
00
02
51
153
00
00
10
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6709
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
152
00
00
10
4.
अदलीपुर
300
00
28
06
299
00
00
70
306
00
00
40
309
00
00
10
294
00
01
59
307
00
15
25
308
00
00
19
314
00
00
10
291
00
00
10
292
00
03
31
293
00
09
07
164
00
04
74
74
00
15
83
73
00
00
33
67
00
00
29
160
00
00
61
77
00
30
13
अदलीपुर
78
00
00
15
108
00
22
53
109
00
00
39
114
00
27
54
115
00
06
75
113
00
01
30
148
00
00
36
5.
गंसरा
123
00
04
29
126
00
07
33
129
00
10
65
130
00
03
01
6710
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
131
00
03
39
132
00
06
74
116
00
00
10
117
00
02
22
133
00
06
32
134
00
05
51
135
00
20
19
136
00
10
30
115
00
07
12
137
00
20
11
139
00
13
50
145
00
00
34
146
00
14
98
149
00
01
12
151
00
00
10
160
00
12
22
गंसरा
159
00
11
26
152
00
00
60
156
00
00
87
153
00
07
96
154
00
07
20
438
00
12
07
439
00
02
32
434
00
00
10
433
00
00
33
440
00
03
70
651
00
01
49
656
00
18
94
663
00
00
10
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6711
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
669
00
00
38
649
00
10
52
648
00
05
24
647
00
04
22
646
00
02
04
645
00
03
16
644
00
07
92
643
00
05
57
695
00
00
11
694
00
16
81
697
00
09
36
696
00
00
19
699
00
00
43
1360
00
07
38
गंसरा
1359
00
08
40
1358
00
00
69
1339
00
00
10
1342
00
04
47
1340
00
00
24
1341
00
00
37
1335
00
12
93
1334
00
00
82
1337
00
00
10
1336
00
04
38
1308
00
07
21
1307
00
00
63
1309
00
00
68
1305
00
01
42
1494
00
00
11
6712
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1495
00
04
23
1498
00
07
28
1507
00
12
69
1508
00
00
34
1516
00
00
32
1528
00
06
58
1529
00
06
26
1525
00
00
17
1533
00
02
25
1535
00
00
10
1524
00
02
77
1523
00
02
41
गंसरा
1542
00
13
81
1558
00
00
36
1559
00
23
59
1557
00
00
39
1561
00
03
15
1555
00
00
10
1821
00
27
44
1820
00
01
53
1822
00
06
90
1857
00
11
06
1848
00
05
31
1847
00
05
39
1846
00
00
82
1845
00
17
82
1839
00
18
03
1925
00
20
61
1926
00
00
61
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6713
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1927
00
00
77
1930
00
22
52
1973
00
01
66
1931
00
00
10
1922
00
00
39
1921
00
00
73
1920
00
22
19
1919
00
06
52
1974
00
09
66
1975
00
00
41
गंसरा
1977
00
03
28
1976
00
11
18
1978
00
04
21
1980
00
03
90
1981
00
01
88
1979
00
01
85
1981
00
01
02
1985
00
00
50
6.
ढकपुरा
3699
00
15
84
3700
00
06
13
3708
00
04
72
3707
00
15
99
3744
00
38
00
3706
00
02
74
3745
00
18
46
3748
00
15
74
3749
00
38
03
3752
00
07
27
4088
00
08
42
6714
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
4089
00
04
33
4090
00
04
08
4091
00
07
05
4093
00
05
45
4094
00
40
29
4120
00
30
14
4123
00
00
33
4126
00
05
68
ढकपुरा
4128
00
04
63
4129
00
05
34
4131
00
00
28
4132
00
08
06
4133
00
08
85
4135
00
07
39
4136
00
07
23
4137
00
09
62
4138
00
29
26
4140
00
25
33
4139
00
01
68
4165
00
02
31
4166
00
03
21
4168
00
15
39
4167
00
12
58
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)20/2018-ओ.आर-I/ई-27595]
नोवस िकन् डो, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 11h December, 2018
S.O. 1766.— Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for
the transportation of petroleum products from Tundla Terminal to Kanpur Terminal should be laid by Indian Oil
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6715
Corporation Limited. And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline,
it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed to this notification;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals
Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land ) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its
intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty–one days from the date on which the
copies of this notification, as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the General Public, object in writing
to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under the land to Competent Authority, Indian Oil
Corporation Limited (Pipelines Division), Construction Office, Northern Region Pipelines, Tundla-Gawria Pipeline
Project, E-160, 1st & 2nd Floor, Kamlanagar, Agra (U.P.) – 282 004.
SCHEDULE
Tehsil: Bharthana
District: Etawah
State : Uttar Pradesh
Sl.
No.
Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
1.
Nagla Bahadurpur
132
00
04
06
134
00
01
76
142
00
15
18
133
00
00
49
141
00
05
28
143
00
03
66
144
00
00
20
151
00
00
82
153
00
00
44
166
00
01
99
165
00
03
27
167
00
00
17
169
00
00
24
170
00
12
68
161
00
04
04
160
00
05
82
159
00
24
03
158
00
00
10
388
00
02
95
387
00
07
08
384
00
00
51
383
00
15
02
6716
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Sl.
No.
Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
395
00
18
54
407
00
00
10
405
00
00
10
408
00
00
60
410
00
00
10
406
00
00
20
396
00
00
49
Nagla Bahadurpur
401
00
02
99
403
00
13
18
404
00
05
73
412
00
00
61
413
00
07
40
414
00
00
24
417
00
01
94
425
00
00
84
423
00
02
61
419
00
04
23
420
00
04
55
422
00
10
38
2.
Saiphi
1400
00
00
28
1397
00
00
10
1405
00
05
06
1406
00
06
81
1407
00
01
40
1411
00
11
33
1412
00
03
90
1417
00
06
05
1419
00
00
37
1424
00
08
61
1432
00
01
17
1431
00
07
29
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6717
Sl.
No.
Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
1429
00
00
21
1430
00
09
96
1459
00
00
36
1453
00
27
40
1454
00
03
59
1455
00
03
64
1477
00
03
43
Saiphi
1476
00
03
77
1475
00
05
49
1482
00
01
36
1485
00
10
90
1515
00
00
72
1514
00
07
45
1512
00
04
98
1511
00
05
99
1510
00
07
85
1501
00
17
55
1500
00
11
02
1499
00
00
33
1539
00
17
37
1542
00
00
38
1540
00
00
24
1544
00
16
76
1564
00
00
77
1543
00
01
71
1563
00
01
41
1497
00
02
91
1562
00
00
18
1566
00
07
47
1567
00
03
47
1560
00
00
36
6718
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Sl.
No.
Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
1559
00
02
65
1570
00
01
99
1576
00
00
11
1571
00
01
93
1575
00
02
72
1573
00
03
24
1574
00
00
50
Saiphi
1583
00
06
71
1585
00
06
30
1584
00
00
10
1590
00
01
46
1589
00
07
92
1593
00
01
93
1594
00
02
24
3.
Nagla Buther
155
00
02
88
157
00
4
55
156
00
02
51
153
00
00
10
152
00
00
10
4.
Adlipur
300
00
28
06
299
00
00
70
306
00
00
40
309
00
00
10
294
00
01
59
307
00
15
25
308
00
00
19
314
00
00
10
291
00
00
10
292
00
03
31
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6719
Sl.
No.
Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
293
00
09
07
164
00
04
74
74
00
15
83
73
00
00
33
67
00
00
29
160
00
00
61
77
00
30
13
Adlipur
78
00
00
15
108
00
22
53
109
00
00
39
114
00
27
54
115
00
06
75
113
00
01
30
148
00
00
36
5.
Gansara
123
00
04
29
126
00
07
33
129
00
10
65
130
00
03
01
131
00
03
39
132
00
06
74
116
00
00
10
117
00
02
22
133
00
06
32
134
00
05
51
135
00
20
19
136
00
10
30
115
00
07
12
137
00
20
11
139
00
13
50
145
00
00
34
146
00
14
98
6720
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Sl.
No.
Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
149
00
01
12
151
00
00
10
160
00
12
22
159
00
11
26
152
00
00
60
156
00
00
87
153
00
07
96
Gansara
154
00
07
20
438
00
12
07
439
00
02
32
434
00
00
10
433
00
00
33
440
00
03
70
651
00
01
49
656
00
18
94
663
00
00
10
669
00
00
38
649
00
10
52
648
00
05
24
647
00
04
22
646
00
02
04
645
00
03
16
644
00
07
92
643
00
05
57
695
00
00
11
694
00
16
81
697
00
09
36
696
00
00
19
699
00
00
43
1360
00
07
38
1359
00
08
40
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6721
Sl.
No.
Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
1358
00
00
69
1339
00
00
10
1342
00
04
47
1340
00
00
24
1341
00
00
37
1335
00
12
93
1334
00
00
82
Gansara
1337
00
00
10
1336
00
04
38
1308
00
07
21
1307
00
00
63
1309
00
00
68
1305
00
01
42
1494
00
00
11
1495
00
04
23
1498
00
07
28
1507
00
12
69
1508
00
00
34
1516
00
00
32
1528
00
06
58
1529
00
06
26
1525
00
00
17
1533
00
02
25
1535
00
00
10
1524
00
02
77
1523
00
02
41
1542
00
13
81
1558
00
00
36
1559
00
23
59
1557
00
00
39
1561
00
03
15
6722
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Sl.
No.
Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
1555
00
00
10
1821
00
27
44
1820
00
01
53
1822
00
06
90
1857
00
11
06
1848
00
05
31
1847
00
05
39
Gansara
1846
00
00
82
1845
00
17
82
1839
00
18
03
1925
00
20
61
1926
00
00
61
1927
00
00
77
1930
00
22
52
1973
00
01
66
1931
00
00
10
1922
00
00
39
1921
00
00
73
1920
00
22
19
1919
00
06
52
1974
00
09
66
1975
00
00
41
1977
00
03
28
1976
00
11
18
1978
00
04
21
1980
00
03
90
1981
00
01
88
1979
00
01
85
1981
00
01
02
1985
00
00
50
6.
Dhakpura
3699
00
15
84
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6723
Sl.
No.
Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
3700
00
06
13
3708
00
04
72
3707
00
15
99
3744
00
38
00
3706
00
02
74
3745
00
18
46
3748
00
15
74
Dhakpura
3749
00
38
03
3752
00
07
27
4088
00
08
42
4089
00
04
33
4090
00
04
08
4091
00
07
05
4093
00
05
45
4094
00
40
29
4120
00
30
14
4123
00
00
33
4126
00
05
68
4128
00
04
63
4129
00
05
34
4131
00
00
28
4132
00
08
06
4133
00
08
85
4135
00
07
39
4136
00
07
23
4137
00
09
62
4138
00
29
26
4140
00
25
33
4139
00
01
68
4165
00
02
31
4166
00
03
21
6724
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Sl.
No.
Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
4168
00
15
39
4167
00
12
58
[F. No. R-11025(11)20/2018/OR-I/E-27895]
NOAS KINDO, Under Secy.
नई िदल्ली, 11 िदसम् बर, 2018
का. आ. 1767.—केन्दर्ीय सरकार को लोकिहत मᱶ यह आवश्यक पर्तीत होता है िक उᱫर पर्देश राज्य मᱶ टूण्डला
टिमनल से कानपुर टिमनल तक पेटर्ोिलयम उत्पादᲂ के पिरवहन के िलये इंिडयन ऑयल कापᲃरेशन िलिमटेड ᳇ारा पाइपलाइन
िबछाई जानी चािहए।
और केन्दर्ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन िबछाने के पर्योजन के िलये यह आवश्यक पर्तीत होता है िक ऐसी भूिम मᱶ
जो इस से उपाब अनुसूची मे विणत है, और िजसमᱶ उक्त पाइपलाइन िबछाई जाने का पर्स्ताव है, उपयोग के अिधकार का
अजर्न िकया जाए ।
अतः अब, केन्दर्ीय सरकार, पेटर्ोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूिम मे उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न) अिधिनयम,
1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1) ᳇ारा पर्दᱫ शिक्तयो का पर्योग करते हुए उस भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार
का अजर्न करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ।
कोई ᳞िक्त, जो उक्त अनुसूची मᱶ विणत भूिम मᱶ िहतब है , उस तारीख से, िजसको इस अिधसूचना मᱶ युक्त भारत
के राजपतर् की पर्ितयाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस िदन के भीतर, भूिम के नीचे पाइपलाइन िबछाए
जाने के िलए उसमᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार के संबंध मᱶ सक्षम पर्ािधकारी, इंिडयन ऑयल कापᲃरेशन िलिमटेड पाइपलाइन्स
पर्भाग, िनमार्ण कायार्लय, उᱫरी क्षेतर् पाइपलाइन्स, टूण्डला - गौिरया पाइपलाइन पिरयोजना,ई-160, पर्थम व ि᳇तीय तल,
कमला नगर, आगरा (यू.पी.) – 282004 को िलिखत रूप मᱶ आक्षेप भेज सकेगा।
अनुसूची
तहसील – िसरसागंज
िजला – िफरोजाबाद
राज्य – उᱫर पर्देश
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
खसरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
रुधैनी
276
00
27
29
273
00
02
53
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6725
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
खसरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
282
00
06
73
285
00
00
41
272
00
00
46
283
00
09
20
284
00
10
50
289
00
00
56
291
00
00
10
292
00
21
60
328
00
00
45
रुधैनी
330
00
10
93
331
00
09
31
333
00
29
34
334
00
12
84
348
00
03
06
349
00
00
10
507
00
07
63
508
00
03
15
506
00
23
40
505
00
24
92
537
00
05
94
558
00
02
60
493
00
00
42
559
00
15
32
573
00
13
79
560
00
00
93
6726
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
खसरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
561
00
04
59
572
00
08
61
571
00
10
01
562
00
21
18
563
00
04
51
564
00
00
10
992
00
12
16
993
00
06
58
रुधैनी
991
00
01
98
995
00
17
95
996
00
07
78
1007
00
31
15
997
00
06
21
1005
00
05
82
1008
00
02
62
1011
00
09
98
1009
00
05
02
1010
00
03
92
1012
00
28
64
1014
00
04
35
2.
भदेसरा
511
00
00
10
493
00
23
59
494
00
09
86
495
00
19
05
498
00
22
42
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6727
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
खसरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
481
00
03
02
480
00
03
11
474
00
00
10
475
00
10
02
478
00
10
56
477
00
00
10
454
00
24
25
457
00
00
10
455
00
09
10
भदेसरा
456
00
00
43
338
00
02
31
449
00
08
60
450
00
06
81
451
00
00
20
342
00
13
56
349
00
12
29
341
00
03
52
351
00
22
79
352
00
12
25
355
00
31
26
393
00
00
37
357
00
11
25
356
00
00
10
361
00
02
94
359
00
00
89
6728
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
खसरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
360
00
03
69
362
00
10
03
367
00
27
27
273
00
02
05
3.
कवीरपुर
557
00
27
90
558
00
19
12
562
00
00
10
597
00
00
96
563
00
11
74
कवीरपुर
587
00
00
54
586
00
06
74
588
00
00
58
590
00
13
51
536
00
05
44
541
00
02
84
540
00
06
61
539
00
09
24
537
00
04
07
538
00
11
67
539
00
02
50
706
00
02
78
707
00
01
02
708
00
01
00
709
00
00
70
710
00
00
46
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6729
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
खसरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
712
00
00
86
699
00
08
42
700
00
12
85
704
00
12
30
703
00
01
66
719
00
00
33
4.
कीठौत
176
00
19
52
178
00
33
21
479
00
09
48
कीठौत
478
00
01
33
477
00
10
34
467
00
09
41
466
00
10
87
457
00
06
46
436
00
18
65
434
00
00
10
437
00
02
41
426
00
09
95
427
00
05
50
428
00
06
83
429
00
03
61
423
00
09
10
424
00
02
80
422
00
05
48
421
00
02
58
6730
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
खसरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
419
00
02
24
417
00
00
10
418
00
09
08
415
00
01
56
414
00
03
51
413
00
03
06
412
00
22
67
379
00
07
67
380
00
04
06
कीठौत
381
00
02
30
390
00
05
09
383
00
01
63
389
00
02
12
385
00
05
37
388
00
08
10
386
00
00
23
387
00
06
54
369
00
00
21
367
00
00
15
368
00
15
33
365
00
01
40
370
00
01
45
588
00
05
44
589
00
11
33
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6731
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
खसरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
5.
करहरा
486
00
22
33
487
00
06
30
488
00
05
55
508
00
40
36
509
00
07
82
510
00
35
14
676
00
13
90
679
00
28
57
690
00
07
10
करहरा
689
00
00
32
693
00
10
12
695
00
05
49
697
00
02
72
701
00
25
30
700
00
19
95
733
00
29
33
728
00
01
54
727
00
04
79
6.
सूरजपुर सोथरा
50
00
03
14
41
00
26
43
49
00
12
09
48
00
01
95
47
00
05
09
54
00
05
32
55
00
03
67
6732
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
खसरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
53
00
11
50
56
00
00
10
57
00
01
87
58
00
16
66
141
00
50
50
140
00
06
62
142
00
04
33
143
00
05
62
144
00
00
85
7.
सᱭगेमई
78
00
05
38
81
00
11
65
80
00
30
84
82
00
19
87
236
00
10
65
237
00
23
51
8.
सोथरा
627
00
01
31
637
00
06
08
638
00
02
62
642
00
00
10
644
00
08
38
643
00
01
28
645
00
08
94
657
00
14
63
646
00
00
40
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6733
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
खसरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
656
00
12
05
649
00
00
10
651
00
01
93
655
00
07
60
9.
अकबरपुर सराय
291
00
07
31
292
00
05
14
293
00
04
97
294
00
02
27
295
00
01
62
अकबरपुर सराय
296
00
18
62
454
00
00
10
455
00
17
62
427
00
12
12
428
00
02
92
425
00
03
08
423
00
01
98
424
00
11
74
429
00
09
11
430
00
05
94
307
00
00
38
308
00
14
98
309
00
07
76
311
00
07
20
312
00
00
10
408
00
00
33
6734
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
खसरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
310
00
01
12
407
00
20
15
339
00
00
36
338
00
00
10
341
00
00
18
342
00
01
90
340
00
00
79
344
00
01
12
343
00
13
31
अकबरपुर सराय
346
00
00
36
347
00
05
93
350
00
01
32
348
00
03
79
349
00
04
31
357
00
00
36
363
00
04
05
362
00
08
58
370
00
00
36
372
00
07
42
374
00
00
37
376
00
11
40
375
00
03
66
378
00
00
10
390
00
00
41
394
00
12
23
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6735
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
खसरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
396
00
00
36
397
00
09
63
10.
शेरपुर अफजलपुर
360
00
06
13
361
00
05
98
362
00
05
52
359
00
02
00
363
00
02
33
364
00
00
18
357
00
10
00
रपुर अफजलपुर
375
00
09
55
376
00
05
51
377
00
16
99
379
00
00
45
335
00
00
10
380
00
00
52
381
00
01
99
334
00
02
75
333
00
12
90
384/1015
00
00
36
397
00
22
99
396
00
10
37
393
00
06
41
392
00
15
76
391
00
00
56
390
00
14
85
6736
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
खसरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
503
00
12
86
502
00
19
16
502/1029
00
05
51
504
00
02
10
509
00
01
70
510
00
18
24
11.
बहादुरपुर
187
00
02
24
191
00
24
36
189
00
01
10
बहादुरपुर
196
00
00
58
198
00
16
09
199
00
01
31
200
00
00
58
204
00
03
01
205
00
00
10
212
00
00
45
213
00
15
85
215
00
00
10
177
00
02
89
149
00
00
10
148
00
01
04
147
00
00
10
146
00
09
86
216
00
00
10
145
00
03
54
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6737
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
खसरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
144
00
02
45
140
00
11
02
328
00
14
60
135
00
00
10
329
00
05
44
330
00
00
74
331
00
01
40
332
00
01
45
342
00
28
11
बहादुरपुर
374
00
00
40
340
00
06
93
378
00
02
13
382
00
14
26
484
00
21
65
485
00
09
71
488
00
10
63
489
00
00
56
491
00
05
04
520
00
01
66
523
00
15
89
522
00
02
71
522/1421
00
00
69
518
00
08
53
517
00
03
80
516
00
15
84
6738
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
खसरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर्मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
544
00
11
11
545
00
11
23
839
00
00
62
864
00
09
07
863
00
08
72
862
00
00
48
865
00
06
47
870
00
00
55
873
00
07
03
बहादुरपुर
872
00
11
41
879
00
00
57
882
00
03
67
883
00
03
99
884
00
04
06
886
00
06
22
887
00
05
66
888
00
06
01
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)20/2018-ओआर-I/ई-27595]
नोवस िकन् डो, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 11th December, 2018
S.O. 1767.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the
transportation of petroleum products from Tundla Terminal to Kanpur Terminal should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation
Limited. And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is
necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed to this notification;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals
Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land ) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its
intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty–one days from the date on which the
copies of this notification, as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the General Public, object in writing
to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under the land to Competent Authority, Indian Oil
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6739
Corporation Limited ( Pipelines Division), Construction Office, Northern Region Pipelines, Tundla-Gawria Pipeline
Project, E-160,1st & 2nd floor, Kamlanagar, Agra(U.P.) – 282 004.
SCHEDULE
Tehsil:- Sirsaganj District:- Firozabad
State :- Uttar Pradesh
Sl.
No.
Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
1.
Rudhaini
276
00
27
29
273
00
02
53
282
00
06
73
285
00
00
41
272
00
00
46
283
00
09
20
284
00
10
50
Rudhaini
289
00
00
56
291
00
00
10
292
00
21
60
328
00
00
45
330
00
10
93
331
00
09
31
333
00
29
34
334
00
12
84
348
00
03
06
349
00
00
10
507
00
07
63
508
00
03
15
506
00
23
40
505
00
24
92
537
00
05
94
558
00
02
60
493
00
00
42
559
00
15
32
573
00
13
79
560
00
00
93
561
00
04
59
572
00
08
61
571
00
10
01
562
00
21
18
563
00
04
51
564
00
00
10
992
00
12
16
993
00
06
58
991
00
01
98
6740
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Sl.
No.
Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
995
00
17
95
996
00
07
78
1007
00
31
15
997
00
06
21
1005
00
05
82
1008
00
02
62
1011
00
09
98
1009
00
05
02
1010
00
03
92
1012
00
28
64
1014
00
04
35
2.
Bhadesara
511
00
00
10
493
00
23
59
494
00
09
86
495
00
19
05
498
00
22
42
481
00
03
02
480
00
03
11
474
00
00
10
475
00
10
02
478
00
10
56
477
00
00
10
454
00
24
25
457
00
00
10
455
00
09
10
456
00
00
43
338
00
02
31
449
00
08
60
450
00
06
81
451
00
00
20
342
00
13
56
349
00
12
29
341
00
03
52
351
00
22
79
352
00
12
25
355
00
31
26
393
00
00
37
357
00
11
25
356
00
00
10
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6741
Sl.
No.
Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
361
00
02
94
359
00
00
89
360
00
03
69
362
00
10
03
367
00
27
27
273
00
02
05
3.
Kabirpur
557
00
27
90
558
00
19
12
562
00
00
10
597
00
00
96
563
00
11
74
Kabirpur
587
00
00
54
586
00
06
74
588
00
00
58
590
00
13
51
536
00
05
44
541
00
02
84
540
00
06
61
539
00
09
24
537
00
04
07
538
00
11
67
539
00
02
50
706
00
02
78
707
00
01
02
708
00
01
00
709
00
00
70
710
00
00
46
712
00
00
86
699
00
08
42
700
00
12
85
704
00
12
30
703
00
01
66
719
00
00
33
4.
Kithaut
176
00
19
52
178
00
33
21
479
00
09
48
478
00
01
33
477
00
10
34
467
00
09
41
466
00
10
87
6742
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Sl.
No.
Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
457
00
06
46
436
00
18
65
434
00
00
10
437
00
02
41
426
00
09
95
427
00
05
50
428
00
06
83
429
00
03
61
423
00
09
10
424
00
02
80
422
00
05
48
Kithaut
421
00
02
58
419
00
02
24
417
00
00
10
418
00
09
08
415
00
01
56
414
00
03
51
413
00
03
06
412
00
22
67
379
00
07
67
380
00
04
06
381
00
02
30
390
00
05
09
383
00
01
63
389
00
02
12
385
00
05
37
388
00
08
10
386
00
00
23
387
00
06
54
369
00
00
21
367
00
00
15
368
00
15
33
365
00
01
40
370
00
01
45
588
00
05
44
589
00
11
33
5.
Karahara
486
00
22
33
487
00
06
30
488
00
05
55
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6743
Sl.
No.
Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
508
00
40
36
509
00
07
82
510
00
35
14
676
00
13
90
679
00
28
57
690
00
07
10
689
00
00
32
693
00
10
12
695
00
05
49
697
00
02
72
701
00
25
30
Karahara
700
00
19
95
733
00
29
33
728
00
01
54
727
00
04
79
6.
Surajpur Sothra
50
00
03
14
41
00
26
43
49
00
12
09
48
00
01
95
47
00
05
09
54
00
05
32
55
00
03
67
53
00
11
50
56
00
00
10
57
00
01
87
58
00
16
66
141
00
50
50
140
00
06
62
142
00
04
33
143
00
05
62
144
00
00
85
7.
Singemai
78
00
05
38
81
00
11
65
80
00
30
84
82
00
19
87
236
00
10
65
237
00
23
51
8.
Sothara
627
00
01
31
637
00
06
08
6744
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Sl.
No.
Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
638
00
02
62
642
00
00
10
644
00
08
38
643
00
01
28
645
00
08
94
657
00
14
63
646
00
00
40
656
00
12
05
649
00
00
10
651
00
01
93
655
00
07
60
9.
Akbarpur Sarai
291
00
07
31
292
00
05
14
293
00
04
97
294
00
02
27
295
00
01
62
296
00
18
62
454
00
00
10
455
00
17
62
427
00
12
12
428
00
02
92
425
00
03
08
423
00
01
98
424
00
11
74
429
00
09
11
430
00
05
94
307
00
00
38
308
00
14
98
309
00
07
76
311
00
07
20
312
00
00
10
408
00
00
33
310
00
01
12
407
00
20
15
339
00
00
36
338
00
00
10
341
00
00
18
342
00
01
90
340
00
00
79
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6745
Sl.
No.
Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
344
00
01
12
343
00
13
31
346
00
00
36
347
00
05
93
350
00
01
32
348
00
03
79
349
00
04
31
357
00
00
36
363
00
04
05
362
00
08
58
370
00
00
36
Akbarpur Sarai
372
00
07
42
374
00
00
37
376
00
11
40
375
00
03
66
378
00
00
10
390
00
00
41
394
00
12
23
396
00
00
36
397
00
09
63
10.
Sherpur Afzalpur
360
00
06
13
361
00
05
98
362
00
05
52
359
00
02
00
363
00
02
33
364
00
00
18
357
00
10
00
375
00
09
55
376
00
05
51
377
00
16
99
379
00
00
45
335
00
00
10
380
00
00
52
381
00
01
99
334
00
02
75
333
00
12
90
384/1015
00
00
36
397
00
22
99
396
00
10
37
393
00
06
41
6746
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Sl.
No.
Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
392
00
15
76
391
00
00
56
390
00
14
85
503
00
12
86
502
00
19
16
502/1029
00
05
51
504
00
02
10
509
00
01
70
510
00
18
24
11.
Bahadurpur
187
00
02
24
191
00
24
36
Bahadurpur
189
00
01
10
196
00
00
58
198
00
16
09
199
00
01
31
200
00
00
58
204
00
03
01
205
00
00
10
212
00
00
45
213
00
15
85
215
00
00
10
177
00
02
89
149
00
00
10
148
00
01
04
147
00
00
10
146
00
09
86
216
00
00
10
145
00
03
54
144
00
02
45
140
00
11
02
328
00
14
60
135
00
00
10
329
00
05
44
330
00
00
74
331
00
01
40
332
00
01
45
342
00
28
11
374
00
00
40
340
00
06
93
378
00
02
13
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6747
Sl.
No.
Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
382
00
14
26
484
00
21
65
485
00
09
71
488
00
10
63
489
00
00
56
491
00
05
04
520
00
01
66
523
00
15
89
522
00
02
71
522/1421
00
00
69
518
00
08
53
Bahadurpur
517
00
03
80
516
00
15
84
544
00
11
11
545
00
11
23
839
00
00
62
864
00
09
07
863
00
08
72
862
00
00
48
865
00
06
47
870
00
00
55
873
00
07
03
872
00
11
41
879
00
00
57
882
00
03
67
883
00
03
99
884
00
04
06
886
00
06
22
887
00
05
66
888
00
06
01
[F. No. R-11025(11)20/2018/OR-I/E-27595]
NOAS KINDO, Under Secy.
नई िदल्ली, 11 िदसम् बर, 2018
का. आ. 1768.—केन्दर्ीय सरकार को लोकिहत मᱶ यह आवश्यक पर्तीत होता है िक उᱫर पर्देश राज्य मᱶ टूण्डला
टिमनल से कानपुर टिमनल तक पेटर्ोिलयम उत्पादᲂ के पिरवहन के िलये इंिडयन ऑयल कापᲃरेशन िलिमटेड ᳇ारा पाइपलाइन
िबछाई जानी चािहए। और केन्दर्ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन िबछाने के पर्योजन के िलये यह आवश्यक पर्तीत होता है िक
ऐसी भूिम मᱶ जो इस से उपाब अनुसूची मे विणत है, और िजसमᱶ उक्त पाइपलाइन िबछाई जाने का पर्स्ताव है, उपयोग के
अिधकार का अजर्न िकया जाए ।
6748
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
अतः अब, केन्दर्ीय सरकार, पेटर्ोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न) अिधिनयम,
1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1) ᳇ारा पर्दᱫ शिक्तयᲂ का पर्योग करते हुए उस भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार
का अजर्न करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ।
कोई ᳞िक्त, जो उक्त अनुसूची मᱶ विणत भूिम मᱶ िहतब है , उस तारीख से, िजसको इस अिधसूचना मᱶ युक्त भारत
के राजपतर् की पर्ितयाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हᱹ, इक्कीस िदन के भीतर, भूिम के नीचे पाइपलाइन िबछाए
जाने के िलए उसमᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार के संबंध मᱶ सक्षम पर्ािधकारी, इंिडयन ऑयल कापᲃरेशन िलिमटेड पाइपलाइन्स
पर्भाग, िनमार्ण कायार्लय, उᱫरी क्षेतर् पाइपलाइन्स, टूण्डला - गौिरया पाइपलाइन पिरयोजना, ई-160, पर्थम व ि᳇तीय तल,
कमला नगर, आगरा (यू.पी.) – 282004 को िलिखत रूप मᱶ आक्षेप भेज सकेगा।
अनुसूची
तहसील – जसवंतगर
िजला – इटावा
राज्य – उᱫर पर्देश
बम
सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेऽफल
हेक्टेयर
एयर वगर्मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
धनुंआ
1
00
21
33
4
00
02
12
79
00
09
07
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)20/2018-ओआर-I/ई-27595]
नोवस िकन् डो, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 11th December, 2018
S.O. 1768.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the
transportation of petroleum products from Tundla Terminal to Kanpur Terminal should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation
Limited. And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is
necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed to this notification;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals
Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land ) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its
intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty–one days from the date on which the
copies of this notification, as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the General Public, object in writing
to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under the land to Competent Authority, Indian Oil
Corporation Limited ( Pipelines Division), Construction Office, Northern Region Pipelines, Tundla-Gawria Pipeline
Project, E-160,1st & 2nd floor, Kamlanagar, Agra(U.P.) – 282 004.
SCHEDULE
Tehsil:- Jaswantnagar
District:- Etawah
State :- Uttar Pradesh
Sl.
No.
Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
Dhanua
1
00
21
33
4
00
02
12
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6749
79
00
09
07
[F. No. R-11025(11)20/2018/OR-I/E-27595]
NOAS KINDO, Under Secy.
नई िदल्ली, 11 िदसम् बर, 2018
का. आ. 1769.—केन्दर्ीय सरकार को लोकिहत मᱶ यह आवश्यक पर्तीत होता है िक उᱫर पर्देश राज्य मᱶ टूण्डला
टिमनल से कानपुर टिमनल तक पेटर्ोिलयम उत्पादᲂ के पिरवहन के िलये इंिडयन ऑयल कापᲃरेशन िलिमटेड ᳇ारा पाइपलाइन
िबछाई जानी चािहए।
और केन्दर्ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन िबछाने के पर्योजन के िलये यह आवश्यक पर्तीत होता है िक ऐसी भूिम मᱶ
जो इस से उपाब अनुसूची मे विणत है, और िजसमᱶ उक्त पाइपलाइन िबछाई जाने का पर्स्ताव है, उपयोग के अिधकार का
अजर्न िकया जाए ।
अतः अब, केन्दर्ीय सरकार, पेटर्ोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूिम मे उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न) अिधिनयम,
1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1) ᳇ारा पर्दᱫ शिक्तयो का पर्योग करते हुए उस भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार
का अजर्न करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ।
कोई ᳞िक्त, जो उक्त अनुसूची मᱶ विणत भूिम मᱶ िहतब है , उस तारीख से, िजसको इस अिधसूचना मᱶ युक्त भारत
के राजपतर् की पर्ितयाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस िदन के भीतर, भूिम के नीचे पाइपलाइन िबछाए
जाने के िलए उसमᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार के संबंध मᱶ सक्षम पर्ािधकारी, इंिडयन ऑयल कापᲃरेशन िलिमटेड पाइपलाइन्स
पर्भाग, िनमार्ण कायार्लय, उᱫरी क्षेतर् पाइपलाइन्स, टूण्डला - गौिरया पाइपलाइन पिरयोजना, ई-160, पर्थम व ि᳇तीय तल,
कमला नगर, आगरा (यू.पी.) – 282004 को िलिखत रूप मᱶ आक्षेप भेज सकेगा।
अनुसूची
तहसील: करहल
िजला: मैनपुरी
राज्य – उᱫर पर्देश
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
शाहजहापुर
170
00
18
56
169
00
00
10
162
00
08
75
161
00
11
83
165
00
03
89
164
00
00
82
6750
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
तहसील: करहल
िजला: मैनपुरी
राज्य – उᱫर पर्देश
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
158
00
00
69
157
00
12
35
152
00
00
34
144
00
03
90
133
00
03
70
145
00
00
96
141
00
00
10
शाहजहापुर
131
00
00
37
143
00
00
16
130
00
07
39
391
00
00
66
390
00
33
29
395
00
00
33
426
00
07
16
427
00
16
18
425
00
01
16
424
00
00
19
436
00
07
34
452
00
00
37
468
00
17
31
2
सैय्यदपुर पर्ान
14
00
08
89
22
00
06
43
21
00
01
53
15
00
02
72
16
00
00
78
23
00
15
85
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6751
तहसील: करहल
िजला: मैनपुरी
राज्य – उᱫर पर्देश
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
287
00
00
45
288
00
09
02
289
00
00
54
290
00
00
10
291
00
00
23
292
00
01
96
293
00
07
90
सैय्यदपुर पर्ान
322
00
11
27
323
00
08
83
326
00
00
26
328
00
07
43
329
00
07
89
331
00
07
77
333
00
00
23
334
00
13
73
335
00
06
99
336
00
05
93
338
00
00
28
392
00
02
00
390
00
04
28
393
00
02
15
394
00
02
22
401
00
12
50
402
00
10
38
403
00
09
37
404
00
05
43
6752
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
तहसील: करहल
िजला: मैनपुरी
राज्य – उᱫर पर्देश
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
405
00
00
26
407
00
17
47
411
00
01
14
410
00
01
01
406
00
01
33
364
00
00
10
365
00
05
10
सैय्यदपुर पर्ान
373
00
17
53
374
00
03
30
372
00
00
53
366
00
26
74
266
00
03
02
268
00
03
99
269
00
04
81
270
00
16
32
271
00
01
25
370
00
00
50
3
हाजीपुर सेमरी
178
00
00
15
179
00
00
10
186
00
00
78
180
00
00
10
181
00
00
31
182
00
00
52
183
00
00
61
4
अहमदपुर
173
00
00
69
181
00
01
59
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6753
तहसील: करहल
िजला: मैनपुरी
राज्य – उᱫर पर्देश
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
189
00
09
71
190
00
11
94
225
00
25
52
224
00
00
88
221
00
01
32
264
00
00
37
250
00
00
10
अहमदपुर
248
00
00
15
252
00
22
78
615/247
00
01
00
247
00
00
10
5
ितरकारा दौलतपुर
73
00
06
64
74
00
07
45
75
00
12
35
76
00
03
76
77
00
00
50
84
00
08
06
85
00
06
96
86
00
00
91
87
00
02
38
88
00
00
10
6
शुकरुल्लापुर
215
00
12
58
216
00
15
46
219
00
16
74
229
00
01
77
228
00
02
40
6754
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
तहसील: करहल
िजला: मैनपुरी
राज्य – उᱫर पर्देश
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
227
00
03
59
226
00
03
49
224
00
05
58
234
00
00
56
236
00
13
71
237
00
00
55
253
00
00
10
शुकरुल्लापुर
255
00
00
10
251
00
08
56
252
00
05
84
7
रम्पुरा
410
00
00
18
411
00
08
80
431
00
12
89
449
00
00
32
450
00
00
12
448
00
15
16
451
00
28
07
453
00
00
72
489
00
09
07
488
00
02
52
497
00
22
94
498
00
02
51
502
00
00
30
503
00
08
40
507
00
07
32
508
00
07
86
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6755
तहसील: करहल
िजला: मैनपुरी
राज्य – उᱫर पर्देश
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
523
00
07
42
524
00
06
28
525
00
08
35
582
00
18
92
583
00
00
31
584
00
00
57
585
00
03
83
रम्पुरा
571
00
01
45
572
00
01
94
568
00
25
10
556
00
04
18
555
00
00
73
553
00
04
76
550
00
05
39
549
00
04
96
548
00
06
23
8
मनौना
274
00
05
79
275
00
03
75
276
00
03
15
277
00
03
24
278
00
14
32
263
00
00
26
262
00
11
55
261
00
08
02
309
00
00
10
310
00
20
41
6756
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
तहसील: करहल
िजला: मैनपुरी
राज्य – उᱫर पर्देश
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
313
00
09
68
312
00
05
73
319
00
06
68
320
00
00
48
321
00
04
31
334
00
10
45
325
00
00
21
मनौना
326
00
00
96
332
00
10
97
339
00
00
10
333
00
01
84
337
00
00
57
340
00
15
38
343
00
01
63
345
00
02
98
346
00
06
17
352
00
08
03
507
00
00
27
510
00
29
32
553
00
15
17
554
00
00
10
555
00
04
07
571
00
04
86
556
00
00
61
559
00
12
72
560
00
01
24
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6757
तहसील: करहल
िजला: मैनपुरी
राज्य – उᱫर पर्देश
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
561
00
01
69
921
00
00
41
914
00
02
46
913
00
01
72
915
00
22
53
916
00
01
33
908
00
02
33
मनौना
909
00
00
10
907
00
18
10
823
00
00
10
902
00
04
94
833
00
30
00
831
00
14
48
830
00
07
90
832
00
13
90
834
00
00
54
837
00
19
30
836
00
02
32
839
00
00
54
840
00
00
36
841
00
16
22
842
00
07
30
780
00
02
65
779
00
03
46
778
00
11
14
777
00
00
10
6758
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
तहसील: करहल
िजला: मैनपुरी
राज्य – उᱫर पर्देश
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
776
00
12
22
769
00
00
29
772
00
08
69
773
00
07
89
9
िभडौरा
572
00
01
02
37
00
08
44
41
00
00
37
िभडौरा
44
00
12
81
35
00
01
58
29
00
02
03
30
00
01
01
31
00
11
83
32
00
09
10
33
00
16
72
25
00
00
10
34
00
16
04
91
00
07
05
90
00
04
93
93
00
00
36
116
00
00
28
117
00
26
35
84
00
16
42
83
00
00
10
119
00
00
60
126
00
12
28
130
00
10
58
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6759
तहसील: करहल
िजला: मैनपुरी
राज्य – उᱫर पर्देश
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
140
00
00
36
132
00
00
55
138
00
00
10
147
00
14
16
146
00
13
04
167
00
04
41
168
00
00
10
िभडौरा
162
00
12
64
166
00
10
19
165
00
03
14
185
00
00
44
197
00
06
51
198
00
05
93
199
00
06
03
200
00
05
98
201
00
05
90
218
00
04
20
217
00
26
41
215
00
15
05
10
अमामई
386
00
01
15
387
00
00
10
385
00
12
14
390
00
01
17
389
00
09
10
384
00
01
07
382
00
10
69
6760
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
तहसील: करहल
िजला: मैनपुरी
राज्य – उᱫर पर्देश
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
439
00
06
19
440
00
05
56
438
00
01
40
426
00
02
13
427
00
06
30
450
00
00
10
433
00
04
66
अमामई
434
00
04
11
435
00
01
01
436
00
05
72
455
00
00
40
478
00
22
88
479
00
00
12
477
00
04
47
487
00
00
29
490
00
06
07
476
00
00
88
475
00
17
37
474
00
00
40
499
00
04
44
500
00
08
11
501
00
09
64
502
00
05
10
512
00
01
17
759
00
12
72
511
00
00
10
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6761
तहसील: करहल
िजला: मैनपुरी
राज्य – उᱫर पर्देश
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
791
00
00
64
790
00
09
90
11
बूरामई
176
00
03
65
175
00
01
87
177
00
10
27
239
00
00
58
240
00
00
58
बूरामई
241
00
08
08
242
00
00
39
419
00
00
10
243
00
32
41
417
00
05
70
416
00
10
73
411
00
00
39
410
00
03
63
409
00
04
38
408
00
04
04
407
00
03
53
405
00
00
37
401
00
10
09
399
00
00
12
398
00
09
50
397
00
06
69
396
00
04
39
6762
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
तहसील: करहल
िजला: मैनपुरी
राज्य – उᱫर पर्देश
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
395
00
05
60
392
00
05
15
391
00
12
88
390
00
05
66
388
00
00
38
387
00
09
14
बूरामई
386
00
03
82
385
00
00
32
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)20/2018-ओआर-I/ई-27595]
नोवस िकन् डो, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 11th December, 2018
S.O. 1769.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the
transportation of petroleum products from Tundla Terminal to Kanpur Terminal should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation
Limited. And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is
necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed to this notification;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals
Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its
intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty–one days from the date on which the
copies of this notification, as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the General Public, object in writing
to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under the land to Competent Authority, Indian Oil
Corporation Limited (Pipelines Division), Construction Office, Northern Region Pipelines, Tundla-Gawria Pipeline
Project, E-160,1st & 2nd floor, Kamlanagar, Agra (U.P.) – 282 004.
SCHEDULE
Tehsil:- Karhal
District:- Mainpuri
State :- Uttar Pradesh
Sl.
No.
Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
Shahjahanpur
170
00
18
56
169
00
00
10
162
00
08
75
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6763
Sl.
No.
Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
161
00
11
83
165
00
03
89
164
00
00
82
158
00
00
69
157
00
12
35
152
00
00
34
144
00
03
90
133
00
03
70
Shahjahanpur
145
00
00
96
141
00
00
10
131
00
00
37
143
00
00
16
130
00
07
39
391
00
00
66
390
00
33
29
395
00
00
33
426
00
07
16
427
00
16
18
425
00
01
16
424
00
00
19
436
00
07
34
452
00
00
37
468
00
17
31
2
Saiyadpur Pran
14
00
08
89
22
00
06
43
21
00
01
53
15
00
02
72
16
00
00
78
23
00
15
85
287
00
00
45
6764
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Sl.
No.
Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
288
00
09
02
289
00
00
54
290
00
00
10
291
00
00
23
292
00
01
96
293
00
07
90
322
00
11
27
323
00
08
83
Saiyadpur Pran
326
00
00
26
328
00
07
43
329
00
07
89
331
00
07
77
333
00
00
23
334
00
13
73
335
00
06
99
336
00
05
93
338
00
00
28
392
00
02
00
390
00
04
28
393
00
02
15
394
00
02
22
401
00
12
50
402
00
10
38
403
00
09
37
404
00
05
43
405
00
00
26
407
00
17
47
411
00
01
14
410
00
01
01
406
00
01
33
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6765
Sl.
No.
Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
364
00
00
10
365
00
05
10
373
00
17
53
374
00
03
30
372
00
00
53
366
00
26
74
266
00
03
02
268
00
03
99
Saiyadpur Pran
269
00
04
81
270
00
16
32
271
00
01
25
370
00
00
50
3
Hajipur Samari
178
00
00
15
179
00
00
10
186
00
00
78
180
00
00
10
181
00
00
31
182
00
00
52
183
00
00
61
4
Ahmadpur
173
00
00
69
181
00
01
59
189
00
09
71
190
00
11
94
225
00
25
52
224
00
00
88
221
00
01
32
264
00
00
37
250
00
00
10
248
00
00
15
252
00
22
78
6766
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Sl.
No.
Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
615/247
00
01
00
247
00
00
10
5
Tirkara Daulatpur
73
00
06
64
74
00
07
45
75
00
12
35
76
00
03
76
77
00
00
50
84
00
08
06
Tirkara Daulatpur
85
00
06
96
86
00
00
91
87
00
02
38
88
00
00
10
6
Shukrullapur
215
00
12
58
216
00
15
46
219
00
16
74
229
00
01
77
228
00
02
40
227
00
03
59
226
00
03
49
224
00
05
58
234
00
00
56
236
00
13
71
237
00
00
55
253
00
00
10
255
00
00
10
251
00
08
56
252
00
05
84
7
Rampura
410
00
00
18
411
00
08
80
431
00
12
89
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6767
Sl.
No.
Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
449
00
00
32
450
00
00
12
448
00
15
16
451
00
28
07
453
00
00
72
489
00
09
07
488
00
02
52
497
00
22
94
Rampura
498
00
02
51
502
00
00
30
503
00
08
40
507
00
07
32
508
00
07
86
523
00
07
42
524
00
06
28
525
00
08
35
582
00
18
92
583
00
00
31
584
00
00
57
585
00
03
83
571
00
01
45
572
00
01
94
568
00
25
10
556
00
04
18
555
00
00
73
553
00
04
76
550
00
05
39
549
00
04
96
548
00
06
23
8
Manauna
274
00
05
79
6768
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Sl.
No.
Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
275
00
03
75
276
00
03
15
277
00
03
24
278
00
14
32
263
00
00
26
262
00
11
55
261
00
08
02
309
00
00
10
Manauna
310
00
20
41
313
00
09
68
312
00
05
73
319
00
06
68
320
00
00
48
321
00
04
31
334
00
10
45
325
00
00
21
326
00
00
96
332
00
10
97
339
00
00
10
333
00
01
84
337
00
00
57
340
00
15
38
343
00
01
63
345
00
02
98
346
00
06
17
352
00
08
03
507
00
00
27
510
00
29
32
553
00
15
17
554
00
00
10
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6769
Sl.
No.
Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
555
00
04
07
571
00
04
86
556
00
00
61
559
00
12
72
560
00
01
24
561
00
01
69
921
00
00
41
914
00
02
46
Manauna
913
00
01
72
915
00
22
53
916
00
01
33
908
00
02
33
909
00
00
10
907
00
18
10
823
00
00
10
902
00
04
94
833
00
30
00
831
00
14
48
830
00
07
90
832
00
13
90
834
00
00
54
837
00
19
30
836
00
02
32
839
00
00
54
840
00
00
36
841
00
16
22
842
00
07
30
780
00
02
65
779
00
03
46
778
00
11
14
6770
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Sl.
No.
Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
777
00
00
10
776
00
12
22
769
00
00
29
772
00
08
69
773
00
07
89
9
Bhidaura
572
00
01
02
37
00
08
44
41
00
00
37
Bhidaura
44
00
12
81
35
00
01
58
29
00
02
03
30
00
01
01
31
00
11
83
32
00
09
10
33
00
16
72
25
00
00
10
34
00
16
04
91
00
07
05
90
00
04
93
93
00
00
36
116
00
00
28
117
00
26
35
84
00
16
42
83
00
00
10
119
00
00
60
126
00
12
28
130
00
10
58
140
00
00
36
132
00
00
55
138
00
00
10
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6771
Sl.
No.
Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
147
00
14
16
146
00
13
04
167
00
04
41
168
00
00
10
162
00
12
64
166
00
10
19
165
00
03
14
185
00
00
44
Bhidaura
197
00
06
51
198
00
05
93
199
00
06
03
200
00
05
98
201
00
05
90
218
00
04
20
217
00
26
41
215
00
15
05
10
Amamai
386
00
01
15
387
00
00
10
385
00
12
14
390
00
01
17
389
00
09
10
384
00
01
07
382
00
10
69
439
00
06
19
440
00
05
56
438
00
01
40
426
00
02
13
427
00
06
30
450
00
00
10
433
00
04
66
6772
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Sl.
No.
Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
434
00
04
11
435
00
01
01
436
00
05
72
455
00
00
40
478
00
22
88
479
00
00
12
477
00
04
47
487
00
00
29
Amamai
490
00
06
07
476
00
00
88
475
00
17
37
474
00
00
40
499
00
04
44
500
00
08
11
501
00
09
64
502
00
05
10
512
00
01
17
759
00
12
72
511
00
00
10
791
00
00
64
790
00
09
90
11
Buramai
176
00
03
65
175
00
01
87
177
00
10
27
239
00
00
58
240
00
00
58
241
00
08
08
242
00
00
39
419
00
00
10
243
00
32
41
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6773
Sl.
No.
Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
417
00
05
70
416
00
10
73
411
00
00
39
410
00
03
63
409
00
04
38
408
00
04
04
407
00
03
53
405
00
00
37
Buramai
401
00
10
09
399
00
00
12
398
00
09
50
397
00
06
69
396
00
04
39
395
00
05
60
392
00
05
15
391
00
12
88
390
00
05
66
388
00
00
38
387
00
09
14
386
00
03
82
385
00
00
32
[F. No. R-11025(11)20/2018-OR-I/E-27595]
NOAS KINDO, Under Secy.
नई िदल्ली, 11 िदसम् बर, 2018
का. आ. 1770.—केन्दर्ीय सरकार को लोकिहत मᱶ यह आवश्यक पर्तीत होता है िक उᱫर पर्देश राज्य मᱶ टूण्डला
टिमनल से कानपुर टिमनल तक पेटर्ोिलयम उत्पादᲂ के पिरवहन के िलये इंिडयन ऑयल कापᲃरेशन िलिमटेड ᳇ारा पाइपलाइन
िबछाई जानी चािहए।
और केन्दर्ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन िबछाने के पर्योजन के िलये यह आवश्यक पर्तीत होता है िक ऐसी भूिम मᱶ
जो इससे उपाब अनुसूची मᱶ विणत है, और िजसमᱶ उक्त पाइपलाइन िबछाई जाने का पर्स्ताव है, उपयोग के अिधकार का
अजर्न िकया जाए ।
6774
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
अतः अब, केन्दर्ीय सरकार, पेटर्ोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न) अिधिनयम,
1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1) ᳇ारा पर्दᱫ शिक्तयᲂ का पर्योग करते हुए उस भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार
का अजर्न करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ।
कोई ᳞िक्त, जो उक्त अनुसूची मᱶ विणत भूिम मᱶ िहतब है , उस तारीख से, िजसको इस अिधसूचना मᱶ युक्त भारत
के राजपतर् की पर्ितयाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस िदन के भीतर, भूिम के नीचे पाइपलाइन िबछाए
जाने के िलए उसमᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार के संबंध मᱶ सक्षम पर्ािधकारी, इंिडयन ऑयल कापᲃरेशन िलिमटेड पाइपलाइन्स
पर्भाग, िनमार्ण कायार्लय, उᱫरी क्षेतर् पाइपलाइन्स, टूण्डला - गौिरया पाइपलाइन पिरयोजना,ई-160, पर्थम व ि᳇तीय तल,
कमला नगर, आगरा (यू.पी.) – 282004 को िलिखत रूप मᱶ आक्षेप भेज सकेगा।
अनुसूची
तहसील – इटावा िजला – इटावा
राज्य – उᱫर पर्देश
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
रािहन
1033
00
00
31
1056
00
19
18
1063
00
01
33
1064
00
14
53
1062
00
10
58
1060
00
01
28
1061
00
00
62
706
00
03
57
708
00
01
24
707
00
13
48
709
00
11
09
710
00
00
50
705
00
00
44
703
00
01
14
711
00
22
88
712
00
14
40
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6775
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
682
00
00
79
690
00
00
15
689
00
15
18
691
00
00
36
2
गुलावपुर
322
00
06
36
324
00
11
29
328
00
00
38
329
00
06
83
331
00
07
20
गुलावपुर
334
00
15
84
335
00
00
29
304
00
14
00
305
00
10
64
306
00
00
10
350
00
36
69
351
00
14
98
353
00
14
44
354
00
01
67
356
00
01
13
355
00
00
82
292
00
05
31
288
00
07
65
287
00
02
84
289
00
00
27
274
00
00
27
275
00
03
07
3
केशᲂपुर रािहन
140
00
02
98
6776
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
139
00
00
66
138
00
03
74
137
00
10
36
123
00
01
30
122
00
06
27
121
00
00
10
118
00
01
40
115
00
06
35
114
00
00
54
केशᲂपुर रािहन
111
00
00
48
106
00
00
47
105
00
09
85
104
00
14
49
103
00
01
64
255
00
00
69
284
00
15
65
283
00
12
56
285
00
00
10
281
00
00
92
277
00
01
50
288
00
00
59
291
00
00
10
292
00
05
03
296
00
03
79
294
00
00
60
295
00
03
20
297
00
00
10
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6777
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
303
00
08
75
304
00
00
39
307
00
09
07
306
00
18
39
305
00
00
94
318
00
00
23
325
00
17
71
326
00
04
92
327
00
11
48
केशᲂपुर रािहन
330
00
15
78
4
सुल्तानपुर रािहन
485
00
02
28
5
गंगापुर
64
00
00
90
67
00
05
02
72
00
03
57
73
00
13
55
74
00
01
63
76
00
00
27
161
00
12
70
157
00
04
99
158
00
01
42
159
00
00
10
154
00
00
61
148
00
00
26
147
00
01
95
146
00
02
65
145
00
00
32
144
00
00
43
6778
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
143
00
01
33
142
00
00
42
166
00
02
59
140
00
13
72
125
00
18
74
120
00
01
48
119
00
00
88
121
00
02
67
116
00
12
81
गंगापुर
114
00
00
71
176
00
00
21
183
00
00
24
178
00
04
71
180
00
01
39
181
00
01
07
181/844
00
00
52
182
00
00
10
179
00
04
86
6
िवठौली
93
00
05
19
89
00
05
63
79
00
22
44
90
00
00
10
122
00
06
57
123
00
05
21
136
00
15
55
135
00
04
42
134
00
05
05
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6779
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
137
00
00
16
131
00
00
40
199
00
00
10
198
00
23
04
197
00
04
17
196
00
09
14
195
00
01
41
312
00
08
32
313
00
10
83
िवठौली
314
00
04
67
315
00
02
59
316
00
04
31
264
00
00
10
265
00
00
10
321
00
00
38
324
00
03
80
325
00
00
10
311
00
00
19
264
00
00
10
265
00
00
10
274
00
04
89
275
00
07
70
276
00
06
91
277
00
08
87
298
00
19
50
297
00
01
20
301
00
06
51
6780
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
300
00
07
40
306
00
04
16
302
00
01
67
305
00
00
10
304
00
00
28
7
चौिबया
1289
00
09
31
1290
00
09
69
1285
00
00
88
1291
00
15
08
चौिबया
1304
00
04
39
1306
00
15
05
1277
00
04
85
1276
00
03
62
1275
00
09
16
1273
00
24
71
1424
00
00
36
1432
00
00
86
1431
00
10
27
1434
00
00
36
1435
00
14
24
1436
00
00
46
8
बख्त्यारपुर
247
00
00
46
246
00
00
70
248
00
07
76
252
00
17
68
253
00
08
82
261
00
11
73
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6781
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
263
00
00
46
264
00
09
03
270
00
09
72
271
00
21
23
276
00
13
55
278
00
00
10
9
खेडा हेलू
4
00
00
28
2
00
05
90
3
00
05
57
खेडा हेलू
5
00
07
71
10
मूंज
3437
00
10
47
3438
00
31
31
3432
00
41
43
3431
00
39
02
3427
00
00
52
3424
00
24
13
3423
00
29
45
3454
00
00
10
3452
00
06
56
3455
00
03
47
3354
00
09
50
3355
00
06
76
3357
00
07
24
3360
00
21
02
3358
00
03
46
3339
00
10
64
3361
00
36
89
6782
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
3336
00
05
67
3307
00
09
14
3571
00
09
49
3572
00
59
41
3547
00
18
48
3543
00
02
01
3542
00
01
23
3541
00
05
09
3548
00
19
80
मूंज
3535
00
00
49
3549
00
00
49
3551
00
01
06
3532
00
33
61
3550
00
02
89
3531
00
31
09
3744
00
10
74
3733
00
02
20
3734
00
03
42
3735
00
07
76
3736
00
06
62
3747
00
23
89
3748
00
00
27
3751
00
00
10
3753
00
12
80
3765
00
10
02
3764
00
06
40
3761
00
07
23
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6783
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
3760
00
02
79
11
मसनाई
454
00
20
84
453
00
39
44
451
00
04
38
440
00
43
51
446
00
08
13
447
00
07
35
450
00
00
10
449
00
00
55
मसनाई
448
00
05
14
484
00
44
29
490
00
01
80
498
00
00
10
499
00
01
22
479
00
02
13
478
00
00
73
477
00
17
09
508
00
03
25
500
00
21
47
497
00
00
17
495
00
00
89
504
00
01
25
501
00
00
10
505
00
41
02
12
सदनपुर
108
00
07
02
107
00
05
40
106
00
14
03
6784
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
104
00
00
10
103
00
00
52
97
00
02
53
100
00
07
26
101
00
07
53
150
00
07
24
149
00
02
07
151
00
00
78
152
00
14
32
सदनपुर
153
00
06
32
154
00
06
61
155
00
11
80
180
00
09
06
181
00
01
64
182
00
05
33
207
00
03
22
208
00
00
33
183
00
01
95
206
00
02
69
205
00
03
58
204
00
00
49
199
00
05
48
198
00
07
11
197
00
00
38
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)20/2018-ओआर-I/ई-27595]
नोवस िकन् डो, अवर सिचव
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6785
New Delhi, the 11th December, 2018
S.O. 1770.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the
transportation of petroleum products from Tundla Terminal to Kanpur Terminal should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation
Limited. And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is
necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals
Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land ) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its
intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty–one days from the date on which the
copies of this notification, as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the General Public, object in writing
to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under the land to Competent Authority, Indian Oil
Corporation Limited ( Pipelines Division), Construction Office, Northern Region Pipelines, Tundla-Gawria Pipeline
Project, E-160,1st & 2nd floor, Kamlanagar, Agra(U.P.) – 282 004.
SCHEDULE
Tehsil:- Etawah
District:- Etawah
State :- Uttar Pradesh
Sl.
No.
Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
Rahin
1033
00
00
31
1056
00
19
18
1063
00
01
33
1064
00
14
53
1062
00
10
58
1060
00
01
28
1061
00
00
62
706
00
03
57
708
00
01
24
707
00
13
48
709
00
11
09
710
00
00
50
705
00
00
44
703
00
01
14
711
00
22
88
712
00
14
40
682
00
00
79
690
00
00
15
689
00
15
18
691
00
00
36
2
Gulabpur
322
00
06
36
324
00
11
29
328
00
00
38
329
00
06
83
331
00
07
20
334
00
15
84
335
00
00
29
304
00
14
00
305
00
10
64
306
00
00
10
350
00
36
69
351
00
14
98
6786
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Sl.
No.
Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
353
00
14
44
354
00
01
67
356
00
01
13
355
00
00
82
292
00
05
31
288
00
07
65
287
00
02
84
289
00
00
27
274
00
00
27
275
00
03
07
3
Keshonpur Rahin
140
00
02
98
139
00
00
66
138
00
03
74
137
00
10
36
123
00
01
30
Keshonpur Rahin
122
00
06
27
121
00
00
10
118
00
01
40
115
00
06
35
114
00
00
54
111
00
00
48
106
00
00
47
105
00
09
85
104
00
14
49
103
00
01
64
255
00
00
69
284
00
15
65
283
00
12
56
285
00
00
10
281
00
00
92
277
00
01
50
288
00
00
59
291
00
00
10
292
00
05
03
296
00
03
79
294
00
00
60
295
00
03
20
297
00
00
10
303
00
08
75
304
00
00
39
307
00
09
07
306
00
18
39
305
00
00
94
318
00
00
23
325
00
17
71
326
00
04
92
327
00
11
48
330
00
15
78
4
Sultanpur Rahin
485
00
02
28
5
Gangapur
64
00
00
90
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6787
Sl.
No.
Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
67
00
05
02
72
00
03
57
73
00
13
55
74
00
01
63
76
00
00
27
161
00
12
70
157
00
04
99
158
00
01
42
159
00
00
10
154
00
00
61
148
00
00
26
147
00
01
95
146
00
02
65
145
00
00
32
144
00
00
43
Gangapur
143
00
01
33
142
00
00
42
166
00
02
59
140
00
13
72
125
00
18
74
120
00
01
48
119
00
00
88
121
00
02
67
116
00
12
81
114
00
00
71
176
00
00
21
183
00
00
24
178
00
04
71
180
00
01
39
181
00
01
07
181/844
00
00
52
182
00
00
10
179
00
04
86
6
Bitholi
93
00
05
19
89
00
05
63
79
00
22
44
90
00
00
10
122
00
06
57
123
00
05
21
136
00
15
55
135
00
04
42
134
00
05
05
137
00
00
16
131
00
00
40
199
00
00
10
198
00
23
04
197
00
04
17
196
00
09
14
195
00
01
41
312
00
08
32
6788
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Sl.
No.
Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
313
00
10
83
314
00
04
67
315
00
02
59
316
00
04
31
264
00
00
10
265
00
00
10
321
00
00
38
324
00
03
80
325
00
00
10
311
00
00
19
264
00
00
10
265
00
00
10
274
00
04
89
275
00
07
70
276
00
06
91
Bitholi
277
00
08
87
298
00
19
50
297
00
01
20
301
00
06
51
300
00
07
40
306
00
04
16
302
00
01
67
305
00
00
10
304
00
00
28
7
Chobiya
1289
00
09
31
1290
00
09
69
1285
00
00
88
1291
00
15
08
1304
00
04
39
1306
00
15
05
1277
00
04
85
1276
00
03
62
1275
00
09
16
1273
00
24
71
1424
00
00
36
1432
00
00
86
1431
00
10
27
1434
00
00
36
1435
00
14
24
1436
00
00
46
8
Bakhityarpur
247
00
00
46
246
00
00
70
248
00
07
76
252
00
17
68
253
00
08
82
261
00
11
73
263
00
00
46
264
00
09
03
270
00
09
72
271
00
21
23
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6789
Sl.
No.
Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
276
00
13
55
278
00
00
10
9
Kherahelu
4
00
00
28
2
00
05
90
3
00
05
57
5
00
07
71
10
Moonj
3437
00
10
47
3438
00
31
31
3432
00
41
43
3431
00
39
02
3427
00
00
52
3424
00
24
13
3423
00
29
45
3454
00
00
10
3452
00
06
56
Moonj
3455
00
03
47
3354
00
09
50
3355
00
06
76
3357
00
07
24
3360
00
21
02
3358
00
03
46
3339
00
10
64
3361
00
36
89
3336
00
05
67
3307
00
09
14
3571
00
09
49
3572
00
59
41
3547
00
18
48
3543
00
02
01
3542
00
01
23
3541
00
05
09
3548
00
19
80
3535
00
00
49
3549
00
00
49
3551
00
01
06
3532
00
33
61
3550
00
02
89
3531
00
31
09
3744
00
10
74
3733
00
02
20
3734
00
03
42
3735
00
07
76
3736
00
06
62
3747
00
23
89
3748
00
00
27
3751
00
00
10
3753
00
12
80
3765
00
10
02
3764
00
06
40
3761
00
07
23
6790
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Sl.
No.
Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
3760
00
02
79
11
Masnai
454
00
20
84
453
00
39
44
451
00
04
38
440
00
43
51
446
00
08
13
447
00
07
35
450
00
00
10
449
00
00
55
448
00
05
14
484
00
44
29
490
00
01
80
498
00
00
10
499
00
01
22
Masnai
479
00
02
13
478
00
00
73
477
00
17
09
508
00
03
25
500
00
21
47
497
00
00
17
495
00
00
89
504
00
01
25
501
00
00
10
505
00
41
02
12
Sadanpur
108
00
07
02
107
00
05
40
106
00
14
03
104
00
00
10
103
00
00
52
97
00
02
53
100
00
07
26
101
00
07
53
150
00
07
24
149
00
02
07
151
00
00
78
152
00
14
32
153
00
06
32
154
00
06
61
155
00
11
80
180
00
09
06
181
00
01
64
182
00
05
33
207
00
03
22
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6791
Sl.
No.
Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
208
00
00
33
183
00
01
95
206
00
02
69
205
00
03
58
204
00
00
49
199
00
05
48
198
00
07
11
197
00
00
38
[F. No. R-11025(11)20/2018-OR-I/E-27595]
NOAS KINDO, Under Secy.
नई िदल्ली, 11 िदसम् बर, 2018
का. आ. 1771.—केन्दर्ीय सरकार को लोकिहत मᱶ यह आवश्यक पर्तीत होता है िक उᱫर पर्देश राज्य मᱶ टूण्डला
टिमनल से कानपुर टिमनल तक पेटर्ोिलयम उत्पादᲂ के पिरवहन के िलये इंिडयन ऑयल कापᲃरेशन िलिमटेड ᳇ारा पाइपलाइन
िबछाई जानी चािहए।
और केन्दर्ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन िबछाने के पर्योजन के िलये यह आवश्यक पर्तीत होता है िक ऐसी भूिम मᱶ
जो इस से उपाब अनुसूची मे विणत है, और िजसमᱶ उक्त पाइपलाइन िबछाई जाने का पर्स्ताव है, उपयोग के अिधकार का
अजर्न िकया जाए ।
अतः अब, केन्दर्ीय सरकार, पेटर्ोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न) अिधिनयम,
1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1) ᳇ारा पर्दᱫ शिक्तयो का पर्योग करते हुए उस भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार
का अजर्न करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ।
कोई ᳞िक्त, जो उक्त अनुसूची मᱶ विणत भूिम मᱶ िहतब है , उस तारीख से, िजसको इस अिधसूचना मᱶ युक्त भारत
के राजपतर् की पर्ितयाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस िदन के भीतर, भूिम के नीचे पाइपलाइन िबछाए
जाने के िलए उसमᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार के संबंध मᱶ सक्षम पर्ािधकारी, इंिडयन ऑयल कापᲃरेशन िलिमटेड पाइपलाइन्स
पर्भाग, िनमार्ण कायार्लय, उᱫरी क्षेतर् पाइपलाइन्स, टूण्डला - गौिरया पाइपलाइन पिरयोजना, ई-160, पर्थम व ि᳇तीय तल,
कमला नगर, आगरा (यू.पी.) – 282004 को िलिखत रूप मᱶ आक्षेप भेज सकेगा।
अनुसूची
तहसील – सैफई िजला – इटावा
राज्य – उᱫर पर्देश
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
1.
िवयारी भटपुरा
2
00
00
10
3
00
14
27
6792
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
00
05
61
8
00
03
60
9
00
20
83
12
00
05
80
28
00
12
06
29
00
17
02
30
00
07
02
31
00
00
10
46
00
15
33
47
00
05
85
45
00
07
26
िवयारी भटपुरा
92
00
09
09
103
00
12
41
102
00
10
95
101
00
10
90
100
00
00
36
99
00
10
22
207
00
25
94
187
00
02
15
190
00
16
48
201
00
10
99
194
00
00
62
193
00
11
47
195
00
18
04
183
00
17
71
172
00
62
33
163
00
00
10
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6793
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
164
00
01
19
165
00
02
84
171
00
02
05
169
00
03
81
173
00
02
00
2.
िझगूपुर
35
00
22
73
34
00
18
55
33
00
17
06
181
00
09
57
180
00
20
46
203
00
52
98
िझगूपुर
202
00
00
14
204
00
18
63
206
00
00
10
3.
चौबेपुर
10
00
08
39
9
00
09
02
8
00
02
12
39
00
00
17
40
00
19
75
41
00
00
37
4.
गᱭजा
519
00
00
42
520
00
03
92
521
00
11
59
522
00
07
19
526
00
16
57
527
00
09
16
531
00
10
86
6794
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
532
00
03
44
586
00
17
77
533
00
00
21
585
00
01
78
583
00
00
10
584
00
16
66
588
00
00
34
590
00
23
54
603
00
13
17
602
00
01
51
600
00
11
64
गᱭजा
599
00
20
21
611
00
00
10
612
00
00
29
613
00
00
36
666
00
00
10
669
00
10
57
668
00
04
80
667
00
12
44
674
00
00
67
687
00
22
54
706
00
18
97
705
00
08
32
1006
00
00
42
1001
00
18
32
999
00
31
01
1019
00
00
10
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6795
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
993
00
05
77
992
00
11
63
991
00
20
12
989
00
08
87
988
00
06
39
987
00
17
10
986
00
00
30
985
00
07
18
5.
ितरकाराबाचा
11
00
07
68
न.सुभान
10
00
17
86
104
00
00
10
ितरकाराबाचा
103
00
00
10
न.सुभान
102
00
00
10
9
00
10
30
106
00
09
97
108
00
07
19
99
00
11
99
110
00
00
50
98
00
31
57
95
00
12
39
155
00
30
14
154
00
00
10
156
00
17
51
157
00
08
11
6.
लछवाई
297
00
20
26
296
00
00
10
310
00
31
64
6796
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
311
00
00
55
313
00
15
47
329
00
54
09
319
00
00
52
322
00
30
58
476
00
25
12
477
00
01
80
478
00
08
72
479
00
00
41
480
00
05
97
481
00
09
47
लछवाई
482
00
00
10
488
00
34
93
487
00
00
68
490
00
13
41
489
00
05
33
492
00
02
15
493
00
04
66
500
00
04
06
498
00
04
31
499
00
01
89
497
00
09
53
496
00
00
17
600
00
00
10
502
00
00
55
599
00
00
74
598
00
05
76
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6797
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
596
00
07
19
597
00
01
46
602
00
00
50
603
00
17
68
594
00
15
23
593
00
00
23
606
00
01
55
592
00
08
09
608
00
02
11
978
00
12
39
979
00
29
40
लछवाई
996
00
06
50
997
00
08
76
1005
00
08
60
995
00
00
10
1006
00
08
15
1008
00
00
10
1009
00
00
10
994
00
12
72
1007
00
02
05
1010
00
10
55
1020
00
01
27
1021
00
13
68
1023
00
02
41
1022
00
05
27
903
00
12
79
902
00
08
88
6798
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
901
00
01
31
900
00
12
79
873
00
06
99
899
00
03
58
898
00
09
57
887
00
02
17
896
00
00
72
895
00
00
20
888
00
15
12
894
00
00
10
893
00
00
10
लछवाई
892
00
02
42
891
00
02
49
854
00
03
27
851
00
01
14
844
00
00
20
852
00
01
00
853
00
04
65
856
00
01
74
839
00
00
76
837
00
03
57
838
00
00
26
836
00
04
13
834
00
18
55
835
00
00
10
833
00
26
23
826
00
01
00
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6799
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
832
00
00
10
812
00
31
08
813
00
08
45
814
00
00
10
7.
नरहौली िभडरुआ
22
00
22
87
25
00
01
27
24
00
00
60
23
00
04
70
28
00
00
10
30
00
00
77
29
00
32
83
नरहौली िभडरुआ
321
00
01
25
334
00
08
26
335
00
17
16
340
00
11
50
341
00
06
19
508
00
01
86
495
00
29
62
496
00
14
15
497
00
02
59
8.
िपडारी
198
00
01
09
1156
00
07
33
1157
00
03
06
1158
00
18
02
1159
00
14
96
1150
00
05
58
1147
00
00
58
6800
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
1146
00
06
21
9.
ककरारा
68
00
10
47
66
00
03
34
67
00
01
41
65
00
12
98
61
00
01
18
64
00
06
14
63
00
10
82
88
00
00
85
96
00
22
78
95
00
09
07
ककरारा
131
00
08
24
129
00
17
59
127
00
16
64
125
00
15
94
10.
उसरई
285
00
03
87
283
00
22
26
282
00
00
21
276
00
00
41
275
00
02
32
274
00
07
48
273
00
00
45
272
00
12
28
139
00
03
29
145
00
11
28
143
00
00
90
144
00
01
18
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6801
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
146
00
12
77
147
00
37
80
148
00
64
24
100
00
00
50
85
00
00
10
173
00
40
19
177
00
06
99
178
00
11
90
169
00
01
17
219
00
05
91
215
00
00
66
उसरई
214
00
00
33
218
00
00
11
213
00
04
61
212
00
04
31
211
00
00
59
209
00
10
19
208
00
10
47
228
00
00
65
238
00
10
67
237
00
02
11
233
00
00
10
235
00
00
10
240
00
05
96
246
00
21
04
11.
कुम्हावर
165
00
00
38
169
00
00
10
6802
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
168
00
15
53
166
00
00
91
167
00
06
93
172
00
05
25
173
00
05
85
175
00
05
27
176
00
05
77
180
00
09
95
179
00
00
22
181
00
04
28
182
00
00
10
कुम्हावर
185
00
06
70
194
00
02
39
192
00
01
69
195
00
01
95
196
00
00
60
529
00
00
67
518
00
00
10
530
00
00
10
531
00
08
72
533
00
03
12
534
00
00
10
560
00
43
06
572
00
00
36
573
00
06
87
574
00
06
50
571
00
00
10
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6803
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
644
00
03
46
642
00
00
10
643
00
03
89
631
00
00
10
630
00
00
10
625
00
00
22
626
00
13
30
627
00
02
01
628
00
00
10
622
00
10
92
612
00
13
86
कुम्हावर
610
00
10
72
609
00
05
33
12.
लᲅगपुर
29
00
01
24
30
00
01
38
33
00
02
37
32
00
17
63
72
00
01
57
73
00
11
30
74
00
04
56
75
00
08
39
76
00
03
94
77
00
03
70
78
00
03
65
81
00
00
10
83
00
05
31
82
00
00
72
6804
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
133
00
01
50
136
00
01
20
137
00
04
18
138
00
06
76
142
00
04
13
143
00
00
67
145
00
05
77
147
00
03
04
148
00
02
66
229
00
04
11
227
00
01
62
लᲅगपुर
231
00
01
36
232
00
01
54
233
00
01
38
235
00
03
53
237
00
15
91
238
00
00
36
230
00
00
10
239
00
10
22
240
00
10
22
241
00
02
07
13.
तुलसीपुर
202
00
00
10
201
00
02
74
200
00
13
73
199
00
00
70
198
00
00
15
192
00
00
45
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6805
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
191
00
06
91
185
00
12
16
184
00
10
67
183
00
00
10
170
00
18
81
169
00
00
10
172
00
03
62
171
00
01
24
175
00
00
27
176
00
01
18
165
00
04
26
तुलसीपुर
164
00
07
11
163
00
07
05
158
00
20
22
157
00
03
67
156
00
09
11
155
00
07
85
154
00
10
71
149
00
00
52
14.
जाफरपुर
396
00
19
01
397
00
01
62
399
00
00
23
388
00
16
79
385
00
00
37
384
00
16
45
381
00
12
94
365
00
00
36
6806
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
372
00
12
69
345
00
00
46
346
00
15
07
344
00
00
28
343
00
00
60
347
00
00
36
322
00
10
31
323
00
12
15
326
00
18
77
327
00
00
18
332
00
07
44
जाफरपुर
331
00
02
91
330
00
05
16
15.
भागीपुर
445
00
00
36
443
00
12
46
442
00
01
83
430
00
00
36
420
00
09
16
421
00
13
26
417
00
00
68
408
00
05
34
409
00
08
43
407
00
00
12
406
00
00
49
405
00
01
21
404
00
00
36
411
00
07
91
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6807
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
403
00
00
37
393
00
12
32
392
00
03
10
394
00
01
69
395
00
00
81
396
00
05
24
601
00
05
83
602
00
04
67
603
00
00
80
600
00
06
86
598/717
00
00
28
भागीपुर
605
00
22
08
590
00
00
36
592
00
00
57
593
00
16
44
583
00
00
10
582
00
09
67
655
00
10
24
656
00
02
51
657
00
08
44
658
00
14
10
682
00
00
10
683
00
00
10
681
00
13
82
680
00
01
16
699
00
27
96
703
00
00
10
6808
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
कर्म सं.
गांव का नाम
ख़सरा सं.
क्षेतर्फल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वगर् मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
704
00
00
10
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)20/2018-ओआर-I/ई-27595]
नोवस िकन् डो, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 11th December, 2018
S.O. 1771.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the
transportation of petroleum products from Tundla Terminal to Kanpur Terminal should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation
Limited. And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is
necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed to this notification;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals
Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land ) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its
intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty–one days from the date on which the
copies of this notification, as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the General Public, object in writing
to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under the land to Competent Authority, Indian Oil
Corporation Limited ( Pipelines Division), Construction Office, Northern Region Pipelines, Tundla-Gawria Pipeline
Project, E-160,1st & 2nd floor, Kamlanagar, Agra (U.P.) – 282 004.
SCHEDULE
Tehsil:- Saifai
District:- Etawah
State :- Uttar Pradesh
Sl.
No.
Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
1.
Viyari Bhatpura
2
00
00
10
3
00
14
27
7
00
05
61
8
00
03
60
9
00
20
83
12
00
05
80
28
00
12
06
29
00
17
02
30
00
07
02
31
00
00
10
46
00
15
33
47
00
05
85
45
00
07
26
92
00
09
09
103
00
12
41
102
00
10
95
101
00
10
90
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6809
Sl.
No.
Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
100
00
00
36
99
00
10
22
207
00
25
94
187
00
02
15
190
00
16
48
201
00
10
99
194
00
00
62
193
00
11
47
195
00
18
04
183
00
17
71
172
00
62
33
163
00
00
10
164
00
01
19
165
00
02
84
171
00
02
05
169
00
03
81
173
00
02
00
2.
Jhingupur
35
00
22
73
34
00
18
55
33
00
17
06
181
00
09
57
Jhingupur
180
00
20
46
203
00
52
98
202
00
00
14
204
00
18
63
206
00
00
10
3.
Chaubeypur
10
00
08
39
9
00
09
02
8
00
02
12
39
00
00
17
40
00
19
75
41
00
00
37
4.
Geenja
519
00
00
42
520
00
03
92
521
00
11
59
522
00
07
19
526
00
16
57
527
00
09
16
531
00
10
86
532
00
03
44
6810
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Sl.
No.
Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
586
00
17
77
533
00
00
21
585
00
01
78
583
00
00
10
584
00
16
66
588
00
00
34
590
00
23
54
603
00
13
17
602
00
01
51
600
00
11
64
599
00
20
21
611
00
00
10
612
00
00
29
613
00
00
36
666
00
00
10
669
00
10
57
668
00
04
80
667
00
12
44
674
00
00
67
687
00
22
54
706
00
18
97
Geenja
705
00
08
32
1006
00
00
42
1001
00
18
32
999
00
31
01
1019
00
00
10
993
00
05
77
992
00
11
63
991
00
20
12
989
00
08
87
988
00
06
39
987
00
17
10
986
00
00
30
985
00
07
18
5.
Tirkarabacha
11
00
07
68
N. Subhan
10
00
17
86
104
00
00
10
103
00
00
10
102
00
00
10
9
00
10
30
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6811
Sl.
No.
Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
106
00
09
97
108
00
07
19
99
00
11
99
110
00
00
50
98
00
31
57
95
00
12
39
155
00
30
14
154
00
00
10
156
00
17
51
157
00
08
11
6.
Lachhwai
297
00
20
26
296
00
00
10
310
00
31
64
311
00
00
55
313
00
15
47
329
00
54
09
319
00
00
52
322
00
30
58
476
00
25
12
477
00
01
80
478
00
08
72
Lachhwai
479
00
00
41
480
00
05
97
481
00
09
47
482
00
00
10
488
00
34
93
487
00
00
68
490
00
13
41
489
00
05
33
492
00
02
15
493
00
04
66
500
00
04
06
498
00
04
31
499
00
01
89
497
00
09
53
496
00
00
17
600
00
00
10
502
00
00
55
599
00
00
74
598
00
05
76
6812
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Sl.
No.
Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
596
00
07
19
597
00
01
46
602
00
00
50
603
00
17
68
594
00
15
23
593
00
00
23
606
00
01
55
592
00
08
09
608
00
02
11
978
00
12
39
979
00
29
40
996
00
06
50
997
00
08
76
1005
00
08
60
995
00
00
10
1006
00
08
15
1008
00
00
10
1009
00
00
10
994
00
12
72
1007
00
02
05
1010
00
10
55
Lachhwai
1020
00
01
27
1021
00
13
68
1023
00
02
41
1022
00
05
27
903
00
12
79
902
00
08
88
901
00
01
31
900
00
12
79
873
00
06
99
899
00
03
58
898
00
09
57
887
00
02
17
896
00
00
72
895
00
00
20
888
00
15
12
894
00
00
10
893
00
00
10
892
00
02
42
891
00
02
49
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6813
Sl.
No.
Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
854
00
03
27
851
00
01
14
844
00
00
20
852
00
01
00
853
00
04
65
856
00
01
74
839
00
00
76
837
00
03
57
838
00
00
26
836
00
04
13
834
00
18
55
835
00
00
10
833
00
26
23
826
00
01
00
832
00
00
10
812
00
31
08
813
00
08
45
814
00
00
10
7.
Narhauli Bhidarua
22
00
22
87
25
00
01
27
24
00
00
60
Narhauli Bhidarua
23
00
04
70
28
00
00
10
30
00
00
77
29
00
32
83
321
00
01
25
334
00
08
26
335
00
17
16
340
00
11
50
341
00
06
19
508
00
01
86
495
00
29
62
496
00
14
15
497
00
02
59
8.
Pindari
198
00
01
09
1156
00
07
33
1157
00
03
06
1158
00
18
02
1159
00
14
96
1150
00
05
58
6814
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Sl.
No.
Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
1147
00
00
58
1146
00
06
21
9.
Kakrara
68
00
10
47
66
00
03
34
67
00
01
41
65
00
12
98
61
00
01
18
64
00
06
14
63
00
10
82
88
00
00
85
96
00
22
78
95
00
09
07
131
00
08
24
129
00
17
59
127
00
16
64
125
00
15
94
10.
Usrai
285
00
03
87
283
00
22
26
282
00
00
21
276
00
00
41
275
00
02
32
Usrai
274
00
07
48
273
00
00
45
272
00
12
28
139
00
03
29
145
00
11
28
143
00
00
90
144
00
01
18
146
00
12
77
147
00
37
80
148
00
64
24
100
00
00
50
85
00
00
10
173
00
40
19
177
00
06
99
178
00
11
90
169
00
01
17
219
00
05
91
215
00
00
66
214
00
00
33
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6815
Sl.
No.
Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
218
00
00
11
213
00
04
61
212
00
04
31
211
00
00
59
209
00
10
19
208
00
10
47
228
00
00
65
238
00
10
67
237
00
02
11
233
00
00
10
235
00
00
10
240
00
05
96
246
00
21
04
11.
Kumhavar
165
00
00
38
169
00
00
10
168
00
15
53
166
00
00
91
167
00
06
93
172
00
05
25
173
00
05
85
175
00
05
27
Kumhavar
176
00
05
77
180
00
09
95
179
00
00
22
181
00
04
28
182
00
00
10
185
00
06
70
194
00
02
39
192
00
01
69
195
00
01
95
196
00
00
60
529
00
00
67
518
00
00
10
530
00
00
10
531
00
08
72
533
00
03
12
534
00
00
10
560
00
43
06
572
00
00
36
573
00
06
87
6816
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Sl.
No.
Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
574
00
06
50
571
00
00
10
644
00
03
46
642
00
00
10
643
00
03
89
631
00
00
10
630
00
00
10
625
00
00
22
626
00
13
30
627
00
02
01
628
00
00
10
622
00
10
92
612
00
13
86
610
00
10
72
609
00
05
33
12.
Laungpur
29
00
01
24
30
00
01
38
33
00
02
37
32
00
17
63
72
00
01
57
73
00
11
30
Laungpur
74
00
04
56
75
00
08
39
76
00
03
94
77
00
03
70
78
00
03
65
81
00
00
10
83
00
05
31
82
00
00
72
133
00
01
50
136
00
01
20
137
00
04
18
138
00
06
76
142
00
04
13
143
00
00
67
145
00
05
77
147
00
03
04
148
00
02
66
229
00
04
11
227
00
01
62
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6817
Sl.
No.
Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
231
00
01
36
232
00
01
54
233
00
01
38
235
00
03
53
237
00
15
91
238
00
00
36
230
00
00
10
239
00
10
22
240
00
10
22
241
00
02
07
13.
Tulsipur
202
00
00
10
201
00
02
74
200
00
13
73
199
00
00
70
198
00
00
15
192
00
00
45
191
00
06
91
185
00
12
16
184
00
10
67
183
00
00
10
170
00
18
81
Tulsipur
169
00
00
10
172
00
03
62
171
00
01
24
175
00
00
27
176
00
01
18
165
00
04
26
164
00
07
11
163
00
07
05
158
00
20
22
157
00
03
67
156
00
09
11
155
00
07
85
154
00
10
71
149
00
00
52
14.
Jafarpur
396
00
19
01
397
00
01
62
399
00
00
23
388
00
16
79
385
00
00
37
6818
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Sl.
No.
Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
384
00
16
45
381
00
12
94
365
00
00
36
372
00
12
69
345
00
00
46
346
00
15
07
344
00
00
28
343
00
00
60
347
00
00
36
322
00
10
31
323
00
12
15
326
00
18
77
327
00
00
18
332
00
07
44
331
00
02
91
330
00
05
16
15.
Bhagipur
445
00
00
36
443
00
12
46
442
00
01
83
430
00
00
36
420
00
09
16
Bhagipur
421
00
13
26
417
00
00
68
408
00
05
34
409
00
08
43
407
00
00
12
406
00
00
49
405
00
01
21
404
00
00
36
411
00
07
91
403
00
00
37
393
00
12
32
392
00
03
10
394
00
01
69
395
00
00
81
396
00
05
24
601
00
05
83
602
00
04
67
603
00
00
80
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6819
Sl.
No.
Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
600
00
06
86
598/717
00
00
28
605
00
22
08
590
00
00
36
592
00
00
57
593
00
16
44
583
00
00
10
582
00
09
67
655
00
10
24
656
00
02
51
657
00
08
44
658
00
14
10
682
00
00
10
683
00
00
10
681
00
13
82
680
00
01
16
699
00
27
96
703
00
00
10
704
00
00
10
[F. No. R-11025(11)20/2018/OR-I/E-27595]
NOAS KINDO, Under Secy.
6820
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
7000 GI/2017
Je ,oa jkstxkj ea=ky;
ubZ fnYyh] 30 vDrwcj] 2018
dk-vk- 1772 -&औ᳒ोिगक िववाद अिधिनयम. 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण मᱶ केन्दर्ीय सरकार,
मेससर् िव᳒ुत मापने के उपकरणᲂ के िडजाइन संस्थान के पर्बंधतंतर् के संब िनयोजकᲂ और उनके कमर्कारᲂ के बीच अनुबंध मᱶ
िनिद᳥ औ᳒ोिगक िववाद मᱶ केन्दर्ीय सरकार औ᳒ोिगक अिधकरण एवं शर्म न्यायालय स. 2, िदल्ली के पंचाट (संदभर्
संख्या 44/2012) को पर्कािशत करती है जो केन्दर्ीय सरकार को 12.10.2018 को पर्ा᳙ हुआ था।
[सं. एल&42012/04/2012-आईआर (डीयू)]
राजᱶदर् जोशी, उप िनदेशक
MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT
New Delhi, the 30th October, 2018
S.O. 1772.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (ID No. 44/2012) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum
Labour
Court
No. 2, Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the M/s.
Institute for Design of Electrical Measuring Instruments, and their workman, which was received by the Central
Government on 12.10.2018.
[No. L-42012/04/2012 IR (DU)]
RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 2, MUMBAI
PRESENT : M. V. Deshpande, Presiding Officer
REFERENCE NO.CGIT-2/ 44 of 2012
EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF INSTITUTE FOR DESIGN OF ELECTRICAL
MEASURING INSTRUMENTS
The Principal Director,
Institute for Design of Electrical Measuring
Instruments, Swatantraveer Tatya Tope Marg,
Chunabhatti, Sion,
Mumbai – 400 022.
AND
THEIR WORKMEN
Shri Anil Kamlakar Thakur,
596/8, Bhonwada Gaon,
Jerbai Wadia Road,
Parel,
Mumbai – 400 012.
APPEARANCES:
FOR THE EMPLOYER
:
Mr. Umesh Nabar Advocate
FOR THE WORKMEN
:
Mr. J. H. Sawant Advocate
Mumbai, dated the 11th September, 2018
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6821
AWARD PART – I
1.
This is reference made by the Central Government in exercise of powers under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and
sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 vide Government of India, Ministry of Labour&
Employment, New Delhi vide its order No. L-42012/04/2012 – IR (DU) dated 09.10.2012. The terms of reference given
in the schedule are as follows :
“Whether the action of the management of Institute for Design of Electrical Measuring Instruments,
Mumbai in terminating the services of Shri Anil Kamlakar Thakur by way of penalty of dismissal from
service vide order dt. 29.9.2010 is legal, just and proper ? If not, what relief the concerned workman is
entitled to ?“
2.
After the receipt of the reference, both the parties were served with the notices. They appeared through their
respective representatives.
3.
The concerned workman has filed statement of claim Ex.5. According to the second party workman, he was
employed by the management in the post of ‘Mistry’ [Tool & Die Maker] w.e.f. 7.10.96. He was permanent employee of
the first party and his service record was unblemished. The first party in & around the last week of September 2006
without any approval and sanction of the concerned authority had alleged to have fixed CCTV Camera in the Workshop
and on 30.9.06 the Principal Director of the first party informed that the aforesaid CCTV Camera was removed / stolen
by some person. The Principal Director made a complaint to Nehru Nagar Police Station, Kurla, Mumbai on 1.10.06.
The Principal Director of the first party thereafter suspended Shri C.M. Narsude, Leader, Trade Union for his alleged
involvement in removal / theft of CCTV Camera and initiated the enquiry against him. However, in the first week of
November 2006, the Principal Director of the first party assured him that if he would give in writing and thereby admits
his involvement in removal / theft of CCTV Camera and tender an unconditional apology to the Principal Director then
the Principal Director would withdraw the enquiry initiated against Mr. Narsude. On the aforesaid assurance given by
the Principal Director of the first party, second party agreed to give in writing that he was involved in the removal of
alleged CCTV Camera and demanded apology. On 14.11.06, Principal Director of the first party forced the second party
to write the aforesaid writing on paper and to sign the same on the proposal of assurance by the Principal Director.
Thereafter on 21.11.06 and 1.12.06, the Principal Director of the first party forced the second party to give in writing by
saying that the earlier writing was not sufficient and then submitted the writing given by the second party to the
Investigating Officer of the police station. As such the first party has also served with charge sheet for alleged
involvement of the second party in removal / theft of CCTV Camera. The second party workman replied the charge
sheet, denying the allegations and the charges leveled against him.
4.
According to the concerned workman, the Principal Director put the back date i.e. 10.1.07 on the written given
by the concerned workman and same was shown as reply to the charge sheet dt. 8.1.07 in place of original reply given by
the second party. However, the Enquiry Officer failed and neglected to consider the documentary evidence relied upon
by the second party. As such the findings of the E.O. are perverse.
5.
It is also a case of the concerned workman that the findings of the E.O. are based on no evidence. There is no
proof to show that CCTV Camera was purchased and put in the workshop of the first party. He even recorded the
conversation between the Principal Director of the first party and he himself which was recorded by him in his cell phone
and same was produced as evidence during the enquiry before the E.O. However, the E.O. failed to consider the same
while arriving at conclusion of enquiry proceedings.
6.
It is also a case of the concerned workman that Principal Director of the first party had several times called the
second party and he has produced the list of incoming calls showing that the Principal Director of the first party
pressurized him to sign the documents. However, the E.O. did not consider the same. He also recorded the instructions
and conversations between advocate Mrs. Archana Srivastava and he himself on his cell phone and the same was
produced during the enquiry before the E.O. However, the E.O. neglected to consider the same.
7.
It is also a case of the concerned workman that the enquiry was farce and even adequate subsistence allowance
was not paid to him during the period of his suspension. The principles of natural justice were not at all followed while
conducting the enquiry proceedings. The E.O. was biased against him. The enquiry conducted by the E.O. was not fair
& proper and as such on the basis of perverse findings of the E.O. the Principal Director of the first party by his order dt.
29.9.10 dismissed him from services w.e.f. 29.9.10. He then preferred appeal dt. 14.10.10 before the Appellate Authority
passed by the Principal Director of the first party. However, the Appellate Authority by its order dt. 11.3.11 rejected the
appeal without affording reasonable opportunity of hearing.
8.
It is thus the case of the concerned workman that he was dismissed from the services w.e.f. 29.9.10 by the
Principal Director of the first party in gross violation of principles of natural justice and as such the order of dismissal dt.
29.9.10 is bad in law. He is therefore asking for reinstatement in service with full back wages and all consequential
benefits, costs & compensation.
9.
The first party management resisted claim by filing written statement Ex.9. It is contended that the concerned
workman was issued charge sheets dt. 8.1.07 & 20.12.07 wherein he was appraised of several acts of misconduct alleged
to have been committed by him. Domestic enquiry was initiated and he was called by upon to plead & defend himself in
the enquiry. He was given ample opportunity by the E.O. in the said enquiry and thereafter the E.O. after recording the
entire proceedings of the enquiry gave his findings on 1.9.10 wherein the E.O. held that the charges leveled against 2nd
party were proved satisfactorily. The first party on going through the notes & findings of the E.O. found no other
6822
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
extenuating circumstances in favour of the concerned workman to take the lenient view in the matter and therefore by
letter dt. 29.9.10 terminated the services of the 2nd party.
10.
It is then contented by the first party that the management of the entire institute is controlled, managed and
administered by the Principal Director who is appointed by the Govt. of India. Therefore the Principal Director in the
interest of institute had decided to install CCTV Camera in the Workshop. The Principal employer has authority to
install CCTV Camera inside the premises of the institute. The said installation work was completed on 13.9.06.
However, the CCTV Camera so installed inside the Workshop was found to be missing on 13.9.06 and on seeing the
scene last recorded by the camera, it was found that 2nd party i.e. concerned workman along with Shri Baglane were seen
coming towards the camera. Accordingly, the first party informed to the police of the theft of said CCTV Camera and
police made enquiry as regards the theft of camera.
11.
It is then case of the first party that the 2nd party issued charge sheet enumerating the charges especially the act
of theft which has taken place in the premises of first party on 13.9.06. The enquiry came to be instituted against the 2nd
party. The 2nd party on 1.12.06 gave written statement wherein he has admitted having committed act of theft of CCTV
Camera. As such the 2nd party has on his own by his letter dt. 10.1.07 gave written confession and he has also tendered
an apology to that effect.
12.
It is then contention of the first party that 2nd party workman has participated in the enquiry initiated against
him. He had extensively cross examined witnesses of the first party. The enquiry has been conducted in most fair &
reasonable manner as per the principles of natural justice. Sufficient opportunities have been given to the 2nd party by the
E.O. to defend and plead himself in the enquiry. It is thus denied by the first party that the Principal Director had called
the 2nd party with intention to compel him to sign on the documents and give false statement in the enquiry as alleged.
13.
It is then contented by the first party that the subsistence allowance was paid to the concerned workman as per
the provisions of law and therefore the said termination of the concerned workman on the basis of findings of E.O. is not
illegal, improper or unjustified. Therefore the 2nd party workman is not entitled to any relief of reinstatement with full
back wages, continuity of service etc. it has thus sought dismissal of the reference.
14.
Following issues are framed at Ex.10. Issue No.1 & 2 are to be treated as preliminary issues. Hence I reproduce
the Issue No.1 & 2 along with my findings thereon for the reasons to follow:
Sr. No.
Issues
Findings
1
Whether the inquiry held against the workman under reference is fair and
proper ?
Yes
2.
Whether the findings of the Inquiry Officer are perverse ?
No
Reasons
Issue No.1 & 2.
15.
The 2nd party workman has filed pursis Ex.14 contending therein that he does not desire to lead oral evidence on
preliminary issues and then submitted notes of arguments on preliminary issues on the basis of enquiry proceedings.
16.
It is well settled that if the service of the employee came to be terminated after proper domestic enquiry held in
accordance with the rules of natural justice and the conclusions reached at the enquiry are not perverse, the Industrial
Tribunal is not entitled to consider the propriety or correctness of the said conclusion. But at the same time mere form of
the enquiry would not satisfy the requirements of industrial law and would protect the disciplinary action taken by the
employer from challenge. The enquiry cannot be said to have been properly held unless,
(a)
employee proceeded against has been informed clearly of the charges leveled against him.
(b)
witnesses are examined ordinarily in presence of the employee in respect of charges.
(c)
employee is given a fair opportunity to cross examine the witnesses.
(d)
he is given fair opportunity to examine witnesses including himself in his defence.
(e)
E.O. records findings with reasons for the same in his report.
Now it is to be seen whether in the present case these requirements are complied or not ?
17.
From the evidence on record, it appears that copy of imputation of misconduct, list of documents relied upon
and the list of witnesses on the basis of which charge has to be established were supplied to the concerned workman. In
the enquiry proceedings, 2nd party workman was allowed to be defended by his advocate. So now the question creeps in
whether the charge sheet suffers from vagueness ?
18.
As a matter of fact, it appears that there were two charge sheets dt. 8.1.07 and 20.12.07. On perusal of these two
charge sheets, it appears that the charges leveled against the 2nd party workman are specific to the effect that it was
noticed that the CCTV Camera installed in the Workshop was missing and during interrogation, the concerned workman
admitted that he was involved in the act of removing the said camera in combination with other workers namely S/Shri
S.S. Sonde, V.T. Baglane, B.R. Kumbhar, Vicky Desai & V.S. Suryavanshi. As such the charge sheet clearly mentions
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6823
about misconduct as per clause 24 (2) of Certified Standing Orders whereby it is alleged that there was fraud, theft,
dishonesty in connection with the employer’s business and willful damage to or loss of employer’s goods or properties
and as per clause 24 to 29, it is alleged that false statement was given before the authority knowing it to be false.
19.
In this respect it appears that even during the enquiry proceedings or in the statement of claim, the concerned
workman has not raised objection on this ground, when infact it appears that 2nd party was issued charge sheet dt. 8.1.07
and the same was served upon him on the same day by hand delivery. 2nd party submitted his written explanation in
reply to the said charge sheet through his letter dt. 10.1.07 which is at Ex.5 of the enquiry proceedings. 1st party issued
notice of enquiry to the second party workman and 4 others by letter dt. 4.5.07 fixing the enquiry on 7.5.07 and thereafter
the 2nd party workman and 4 other workmen who were charge sheeted gave the joint letter dt. 5.5.07 for postponement of
the enquiry. It appears therefore that the enquiry proceedings are not disputed by the 2nd party workman and therefore
the contention of the 2nd party workman that the charge sheet was vague does not stand to reason.
20.
It is well settled that the ground of challenge of enquiry has to be pleaded and proved. The legality and fairness
of the enquiry is challenged on the ground that the charge sheet is not issued by the competent authority. This challenge
to the legality of the enquiry is without pleading in the statement of claim. Even if some anxious consideration is given
to this objection raised by the concerned workman then it can be seen that the enquiry is to be conducted as per Certified
Standing Orders. Clause 26.2 (a) of the Certified Standing Orders clearly provides that the Secretary or any other
persons authorized to do so shall frame the charge sheet against the employee in writing setting out the alleged
misconduct. The Certified Standing Orders placed on record, have been admitted by the second party workman. That
apart it appears that resolution was passed at item No. 63 (8) of agenda giving details of delegation of powers in favour
of Chairman & Principal Director as per Annexure – IX of agenda note. It cannot be disputed that the second party was
employee in Group – C and Annexure – A. The said resolution clearly mentions that the disciplinary authority for
Group – C employees is Secretary and the Appellate Authority would be Principal Director. The copy of minutes of 63
Govt. Counsel meeting is placed on record at Sr. 2 below Ex.19. Annexure – A at page 60 shows that for Group – C or
equivalent post Secretary is the appointing authority and Principal Director is the Appellate Authority. It cannot be said
therefore that the charge sheet is not issued by the competent authority since it has been issued by the Secretary who is
the disciplinary authority so far as Group – C employees is concerned.
21.
Learned Counsel for the 2nd party workman submitted that Secretary of the first party is not disciplinary
authority of the second party who issued the charge sheet and therefore the disciplinary proceedings based upon charge
sheet issued by the incompetent authority are bad in law. He seeks to rely on the decision in case of Ananta Krishnan
V/S. Oriental Fire & General Insurance Co. Ltd. – 1988 II CJ 526 to submit that if enquiring authority had no jurisdiction
to proceed with the enquiry such a defect will not be cured on account of fact that the said order was confirmed by the
appellate authority. In that case as per General Insurance Conduct Discipline & Appeal Rules, Manager has no authority
to initiate the disciplinary action against the petitioner. The enquiry also covered larger period than was covered by the
charge. It was observed that the enquiry was absolutely without jurisdiction and illegal.
22.
In case of Desraj Verma V/s. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, U.T. Chandigarh & Anr. 2003 III CLR 880. It
was finding of the fact that there was no record to show that M.D. has delegated that authority to dismiss the petitioner
who has challenged the authority of M.D. to terminate the services.
23.
In the decision in case of Gostha Behari Jana V/S. Calcutta State Transport Corpn. & Ors. – 2000 I CLR 315. It
was considered that the employee cannot be dismissed from service by an authority subordinate to the appointing
authority. In that case the special officer who had passed the order of punishment on to the petitioner, appellant was
subordinate to the Depot Manager who had appointed the petitioner. In the circumstances it was considered that the said
order was illegal.
24.
In the decision in case of Meghraj Ragobaji Navle & Ors. V/S. Addl. Controller, Nagpur – 2002 LAB IC 9151.
The ratio of judgment is that the Addl. Controller is not the competent authority to terminate the services of temporary
employees.
25.
Here in the instant case the facts are different & distinguishable. As seen earlier clause No. 26/2 of Certified
Standing Orders provides that Secretary or any other person authorized to do so shall frame a charge against employee.
The Certified Standing Orders have been certified before the Dy. Commissioner to which the recognized union was
party. The said Certified Standing Orders were published by notification No. 362 of 1991. As such clause 62/2(A) of
Certified Standing Orders clearly provides that the Secretary is the disciplinary authority for issuing the charge sheet and
taking necessary action against the second party workman who is Group – C employee. So in the facts of present case it
cannot be said that the charge sheet is not issued by the competent authority.
26.
The another ground raised by the concerned workman is that the Principal Director who has issued the first
charge sheet dt. 8.1.07 was examined in the enquiry proceedings by the first party and in the circumstances the E.O. who
paid the fees by the Director is bound to oblige the Director Shri S.P. Rasal and accordingly the E.O. obliged him.
27.
This objection is also not sustainable in the facts of present case because as regards the charge of gherao to the
Principal Director he was the only witness to prove the charges as he was the person who was gheraod. It was necessary
for the Presiding Officer to examine him to prove the charge of gherao. Even otherwise the concerned workman was
allowed to be defended by advocate who cross examined the Principal Director who appeared as witness of first party
and that time also the concerned workman has not taken any objection during the enquiry proceedings nor this ground is
pleaded in the statement of claim. Even otherwise it can be said that if Principal Director was examined in the enquiry
6824
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
proceedings being the only witness to prove the charge of gherao then that will not be a ground to say that the enquiry
was not fair & proper.
28.
The next objection raised on behalf of the 2nd party workman is that the appointment of E.O. Dutta Patil who is
an advocate is contrary to the Certified Standing Orders. It is because the E.Os were outside persons.
29.
It is no doubt true that the Certified Standing Orders provides that the employee may be defended by his
colleague or fellow employee considering the nature of charges leveled against him. Even the Certified Standing Orders
do not bar the appointment of the outsiders or advocates as E.O. or P.O. Since the E.O. and P.O. are advocates and
considering the nature of the charges leveled against the 2nd party workman he was also to be allowed to be defended by
an advocate. It can be said therefore that no prejudice was caused to the concerned workman since he was also allowed
to be defended by an advocate. Nowhere it has been pointed out by the Learned Counsel for the concerned workman that
such an appointment of E.O. or P.O. is barred by the Certified Standing Orders. On the contrary it appears that no any
objection was raised during the enquiry proceedings in the context and for the first time in the arguments the objection
was raised which is unacceptable.
30.
The question is whether the prejudice is caused to the concerned workman because of the change of E.O. by the
first party ? E.O. was appointed by an order dt. 20.6.10 and he conducted the enquiry proceedings thereafter from
29.6.10 to 21.7.10 on 3 dates. On 21.7.10, 2nd party workman closed his evidence and submitted that he does not want to
lead any further evidence. It cannot be said therefore that due to change of the E.O. on account that he had to undergo
bypass surgery, prejudice had caused to the concerned workman.
31.
Learned Counsel for the concerned workman submitted that the conversion between the concerned workman
and the representative of the management was recorded on 31.7.07 vide Ex.25 to 35 and the reply of the concerned
workman to the charge sheet dt. 10.1.07 is back dated by the management after 31.7.07 and as such his reply dt. 10.1.07
was obtained by Principal Director of the first party under threat to the 2nd party workman and under assurance that the
disciplinary authority would not take any action against him. However, on going through the record, it appears that the
notice of the enquiry dt. 4.5.07 refers to reply to the charge sheet submitted by the 2nd party workman dt. 10.1.0. Even
otherwise the E.O. has considered the objections raised by the concerned workman and therefore the E.O. is not expected
to consider the contents of the 2nd party workman which were not raised by him during the enquiry proceedings.
32.
As regards the findings of the E.O., it was tried to point out that the defence witness Shri Vijay Changlani in his
evidence has stated that CCTV Camera was never purchased by the first party from his shop and this sort of evidence
was not taken into consideration by the E.O. Then the submission is also to the effect that the first party by its letter dt.
1.10.06 lodged a complaint with Nehru Nagar Police Station regarding loss of CCTV Camera in the Workshop and the
said complaint was withdrawn by the first party by its letter dt. 5.12.06. It is then submitted that the authentic list of
conversion with the officers of first party has not been taken on record of the enquiry proceedings and even the E.O.
ignored to give findings on these aspects. The said conversions among the 2nd party workman and advocate Ms. Archana
Srivastava, Shri S.V. Rasal and Mrs. Nachane have not been taken on record and were ignored by the E.O. while giving
his findings. With this the submission is that the findings of the E.O. are perverse and as such the E.O. did not apply his
mind to the evidence and merely recorded ipsedixit that the charges are proved. In the context, reliance is also placed in
the decision in case of Anil Kumar V/s. P.O. & Ors. – (1985) 3 SSC 378.
33.
In this respect, having gone through the enquiry proceedings it can be seen that the 2nd party workman produced
transcription of the audio recording without producing audio CD though the transcription was produced on 29.2.08. The
time was sought by the 2nd party workman to produce the CD. Even thereafter the CD was not produced on 18.3.08. It
was considered by the E.O. that the CD which was produced on 28.3.08 is not clear as regards the identification of the
persons whose talks were recorded in the C.D.
34.
Nextly, as regards the objections that the first party has withdrawn the police complaint, it was considered by
the E.O. that the complaint was withdrawn for the reasons that the first party decided to hold preliminary proceedings
against the 2nd party workman. The E.O. accordingly submitted his report on 1.9.10. As such on going through the
report of E.O., it appears to me that his findings are based on evidence.
35.
On going through the report of the E.O., it appears that it is well reasoned order holding charge No.1 to 4 as
proved. It can be said therefore that the findings of the E.O. are based on material on record and the same are not
perverse. The above issues are therefore answered accordingly as indicated against it in terms of above observations.
36.
Hence I pass the following order.
ORDER
1. Enquiry held is fair & proper.
2. Findings of the Enquiry Officer are not perverse.
3. Parties are directed to argue and lead evidence on the point of quantum of punishment.
Date: 11.09.2018
M.V. DESHPANDE, Presiding Officer
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6825
नई िदल् ली, 5 नवम् बर, 2018
का.आ. 1773.—औ᳒ोिगक िववाद अिधिनयम 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण मᱶ केन्दर्ीय सरकार
मुख्य अिभयंता (िव᳒ुत), दूरसंचार िवभाग, चंडीगढ़ एवं उनके कमर्चारी के पर्बंधतंतर् के संब िनयोजकᲂ और उनके कमर्कारᲂ
के बीच अनुबंध मᱶ िनिद᳥ औ᳒ोिगक िववाद मᱶ केन्दर्ीय सरकार औ᳒ोिगक अिधकरण एवं शर्म न्यायालय-2, चंडीगढ़ के पंचाट
(संदभर् संख्या 764/2005) को पर्कािशत करती है जो केन्दर्ीय सरकार को 30.10.2018 को पर्ा᳙ हुआ था।
[फा. सं. जेड-22019/03/2013-आईआर(सी-II)]
राजᱶदर् जोशी, उप िनदेशक
New Delhi, the 5th November, 2018
S.O. 1773.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (ID.No. 764/2005) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour
Court-2, Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Chief
Engineer (Electrical), Department of Telecom, Chandigarh and their workman, which was received by the Central
Government on 30.10.2018.
[F. No. Z-22019/03/2013-IR(C-II)]
RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director
ANNEXURE
IN THE COURT OF SHRI AVTAR CHAND DOGRA : PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT No. 2, CHANDIGARH
ID No. 764/2005
Shri Upkar Singh s/o. Shri Sant Singh,
C/o. Shri Amit Sharma,
K.No.903, Sector 64, Phase XI,
Mohali,
Chandigarh.
…Workman/Claimant
Versus
The Chief Engineer (Electrical),
Deptt. Of Telecom,
SCO No,.332-34, Sector 64,
Chandigarh.
…Management
AWARD
This Award shall decide a reference which was made to this Tribunal by the Appropriate Government vide letter
No. L-40012/17/2004-IR(DU) dated 28.07.2004 under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10
of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(in short the Act) for adjudication of an industrial dispute, terms of which are as
under:
‘Whether the action of the management of Telecom now known as BSNL in terminating the services of Shri
Upkar Singh Ex-Peon w.e.f. 28/8/2001 without any notice and without complying with the provisions of the ID
Act, 1947 is just and legal ? If not, to what relief the concerned workman is entitled to and from which date ?
2.
Both parties were put to notice and the claimant Upkar Singh filed his statement of claim, with the averments
that he was engaged as a Peon by the Management on daily wage basis w.e.f. 4/4/1998 and his services were illegally
terminated on 28/8/2001 without any notice or without payment of any compensation. The workman had completed more
than 240 days of service in each calendar year. Even the persons junior to him were retained in service and thus, there is
violation of Section 25-G of the Act. The management again appointed fresh persons without giving him any priority
and violated Section 25-H of the Act. Prayer has been made for reinstatement into service with all consequential
benefits.
3.
The claim petition has been resisted by the Management who filed its reply, alleging that the claim is barred by
time as the claimant is alleging his engagement in 1998 whereas the present claim has been filed on 27/9/2004, for
which there is neither any records to show his engagement nor it can be verified. It has been alleged that the
workman was engaged in the office of Chief Engineer in the month of April, 2000 on a stop gap arrangement where he
worked upto June, 2001. According to them the workman worked for 181 days in the year 2000 and 120 days in 2001
(total for 301 days). Thereafter the contract was given to the Security Agency and the workman did not work for the
6826
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Management. There was no requirement to comply with the provisions of Section 25-F, 25-G and 25-H of the Act.
Prayer has been made for dismissal of the claim petition.
4.
In support of his case the workman appeared in the witness box and tendered his evidence by way of affidavit.
However, the Management did not lead any evidence and its evidence was closed vide order dated 17.12.2013.
5.
Perusal of the record shows that in this my learned Predecessor had passed Award dated 6.6.2014 holding that
the claimant./workman failed to prove that he was engaged as Peon on 4/4/1998 on daily wage basis and worked with the
Management till 28/8/2001 and as such it can not be said that he continuously worked for 240 days in a calendar year and
as such he was held not to be entitled to any relief. The workman/claimant assailed the Award before Hon’ble High
Court of Punjab & Haryana by filing CWP No.20536 of 2014. While observing that the claim petition vis-à-vis
annexures P-2, P-6 and P-7, has not been appraised by the Labour Court and that the workman evidently had made
necessary application for summoning the record, Hon’ble High Court vide order dated 18/4/2008 set aside the aforesaid
Award and remanded the matter back to this Tribunal with the direction to the Management to produce necessary
material/attendance record, before the Tribunal for fresh consideration of the matter.
6.
I have heard Shri Jaswinder Singh A/R for the workman and Shri Aish Babbar A/R for the Managemet and have
gone through the records carefully.
7.
There is no dispute about preposition of law that onus to prove that claimant was in the employment of
Management is always on the workman/claimant and it is for the workman to adduce evidence to prove factum of his
employment with the Management. Such evidence may be in form of receipt of salary or wages for 240 days or record
of his/her appointment or engagement for that year to show that he/she has worked with the employer for 240 days or
more in a Calendar year. In this regard, reference may be made to Batala Coop. Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. Sowaran Singh,
(2005) 8 Supreme Court Cases 481 as well as Director Fisheries Terminated Division Vs. Bhikubhai Meghajibhai
Gavda (2012) 1 SCC 47.
8.
There is hardly any dispute with the preposition of law as propounded in the aforesaid case. However, the
factual scenario in the present case is bit different, inasmuch as the Management in its written statement has clearly
admitted the factum of employment of the claimant inasmuch as it has been stated that the workman was engaged in the
office of Chief Engineer in the month of April, 2000 on a stop gap arrangement where he worked upto June, 2001. As
such, it clearly establishes relationship of employer-employee between the Management and claimant. In this regard,
reference can be made to the decision in the case of Devinder Singh Vs. Municipal Council, Sanaur, AIR 2011 Supreme
Courtt 2532, wherein the Hon’ble Apex Court while interpreting the provisions of Section 2(S) of the Act which deals
with the definition of “workman” has observed as under :-
“The source of employment, the quantum of recruitment, the terms & conditions of employment/ contract of
service, the quantum of wages/ pay and mode of payment are not at all relevant for deciding whether or not a
person is a workman within the meaning of Section 2(s) of the Act. The definition of workman also does not
make any distinction between full time and part time employee or a person appointed on contract basis. There
is nothing in the plain language of Section 2(s) from which it can be inferred that only person employed on
regular basis or a person employed for doing whole time job is a workman and the one employed on temporary,
part time or contract basis on fixed wages or as a casual employee or for doing duty for fixed hours is not a
workman.”
It is clear from the perusal of aforesaid observations that even if a person is engaged on temporary, part time or contract
basis or for doing any other kind of work and is duly paid wages for the said work, in that eventuality such a person
would be covered by the definition of “workman” as provided in Section 2(S) of the Act. In these circumstances, it stands
proved that there existed relationship of employer-employee between the parties.
9.
Equally settled is the position of law that when relationship of employer-employee stands proved between the
parties, then onus will shift upon the employer/management to show that the claimant has not worked for 240 days or
more in a calendar year or that the services of the claimant was terminated in accordance with the provisions of the Act.
It is specific case of the workman/claimant that he was engaged as a Peon by the Management on daily wage basis w.e.f.
4.4.1998 and he worked as such till 28/8/2001 when his services were illegally terminated. He in fact had completed
more than 240 days of service in each calendar year but despite that no notice or compensation in lieu of notice period
was given to him prior to termination of his services by the Management. The affidavit filed by the workman /claimant is
in line with the averments made in the claim petition. He has also filed on record copies/extracts of the Attendance
Register for the months of January to March, 1999 as Ex.W-1/1 to Ex.W-1/3. In cross examination the
claimant/workman has denied the suggestion that he had not completed 240 days or that there did not exist any dispute
because he has been paid for the period he actually worked. I may mention that the Management has not adduced any
evidence whatsoever to rebut the case of the claimant or to substantiate its stand that the workman/claimant who was
engaged in April, 2000 only had worked for 181 days prior to discontinuation of his services on 28.8.2001. It is pertinent
to mention here that the claimant/workman had filed an application dated 1.11.2006 for summoning/production of record
by the Management viz. Attendance Register, Receipts/voucher books about receipt of wages. In the reply it has been
stated that no attendance register was maintained for a person working as stop gap arrangement and moreover, the
claimant/applicant was not engaged in the year 1998. The pages of attendance register as produced by the claimant
appears to be manufactured documents. The original of Annexure W-2 is not available on record of the office.
However, photocopies of receipts/ payment vouchers for the months from April,2000 to June, 2001 have been filed on
record by the Management. It is also manifest from these receipts/payment vouchers that the claimant worked regularly
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6827
under the Management from April, 2000 to June, 2001, though he was paid wages only in respect of the official working
days. The Management has not filed on record the Attendance Register or vouchers for the remaining period so as to
rebut the claim of the claimant/workman that he worked with the Management w.e.f. 4.4.1998 till 28/8/2001 or to
substantiate its own claim that the claimant had in fact worked only for 181 days in a calendar year, The Management
has not produced the aforesaid record merely on the plea that the said record being old is not available. However, the
Management has not filed any document to show that the requisite record being old has been weeded out and if so, by
which order. In these circumstances, this Tribunal is constrained to draw adverse inference against the Management
under Section 114(g) of the Evidence Act for non production of the requisite records and to believe the version of the
claimant that he worked with the Management for over 240 days in a calendar year.
10.
There is another aspect of the matter. The claimant has filed on record photocopy of the letter dated 28/8/2001
which Shri Boota Singh, Supdt. Surveyor of Works (E) had confidentially sent to Shri P.K. Gupta, Chief Engineer
(Electrical), BSNL, Chandigarh, giving explanation about engagement of casual labourers viz. Upkar Singh during
ban period. Perusal of the said letter Annexure P-2 (now marked as Ex.C-1) shows that Shri Boota Singh,
Sudpt.Surveyr of Works had apprised Chief Engineer (Electrical) that no instruction of BSNL Headquarter stand violated
once all office staff including he (Chief Engineer) have been utilizing the services of Shri Upkar Singh continuously in
absence of responsible person posted till date and that there is no such back door entry of any person, once there is no
Peon for 3 Working Heads and 20 staff & minute by minute services of three persons as such being utilized since 1998 in
absence of three peons very much required and lastly it was stated that on his (Chief Engineer’s) direction dated
24/8/2001, Shri Upkar Singh has been asked not to attend office w.e.f. 28/8/2001. During cross-examination the
claimant clarified that he could not show the original of aforesaid letter dated 28/8/2001 as the same is in the possession
of the department but denied the suggestion that the said letter dated 28/8/2001 was fabricated & manufactured by him.
The Management has not examined either Shri Boota Singh, the then Supdt. Surveyor of Works (E) or Shri P.K. Gupta,
the then Chief Engineer (Electrical), BSNL, Chandigarh about the authenticity of the said letter, which clearly fortifies
the claim of the claimant that his services which were being utilized from 1998, were terminated only on 28/8/2001. In
view of this and as discussed above, the contention of the Management that the workman did not work for 240 days in a
calendar year does not hold ground.
11.
Now the vital question arises for consideration is whether termination of the claimant from his services by the
Management w,e.f. 28.8-2001 is in accordance with law or in violation of the provisions of Section 25-F of the Act.
According to the testimony of the workman /claimant the work of peon on which he was working was of permanent
nature and that his services were terminated by the Management in violation of Section 25-F, 25-G and 25-H of the Act.
After termination he had also approached the Management for reinstatement number of times as work was available with
the Management but all in vain. Thereafter demand notice dated 10.9.2003 was filed before Conciliation Officer. It is
neither the case of the Management that any notice or compensation in lieu of notice period was given to the claimant
prior to termination of his services w.e.f. 28/8/2001, nor any such evidence has been adduced on record by the
Management. It is reiterated that the Management did not examine any witness to rebut the case of the claimant. In
these circumstance, this Tribunal has no hesitation to hold that the services of the claimant were terminated by the
Management w.e.f. 28/8/2001 in violation of the provisions of Section 25-F of the Act.
12.
There is long line of decisions of Hon’ble Apex Court as well as of various High Courts that provisions of
Section 25-F of the Act are mandatory in nature and termination of the workman from services in derogation of the
provisions of Section 25-F of the Act will render action of the Management to be illegal and void under the law.
13.
Since there is no evidence on record that any valid notice was issued by the Management to the workman at the
time of termination or in lieu of such notice, any compensation was paid to him, as such action of the Management in
terminating the services of the workman is held to be illegal and void.
14.
Now the residual question is whether the claimant/work is entitled to any incidental relief of payment of back
wages and/or reinstatement of service with full back wages. It is proved on record that claimant was continuously in the
employment of the Management from March, 1998 to 28/8/2001 though on daily wage basis. There is no show cause
notice or memo issued to the claimant/workman by the Management. Moreover, the job of the workman is of perennial
and regular nature which fact is also apparent from the document/letter dated 28/8/2001 (Ex.C-1). Though the
workman/claimant has pleaded that he is unemployed from the date of his termination, however in his cross examination
he clarified that he used to work on daily wages as and when the work was available to him. Just because the workman
is doing some intermittent job as & when he finds work, it can not be said that he is gainfully employed to make
livelihood for himself and his family. The Management has not adduced any evidence to show that the
workman/claimant is gainfully employed.
15.
The Hon’ble Apex Court in case “Deepali Gundu Surwase v. Kranti Junior Adhyapak Mahavidyalaya”
reported as (2013) 10 SCC 324 has held as under :
“The propositions which can be culled out from the aforementioned judgments are :
i)
In cases of wrongful termination of service, reinstatement with continuity of service and back
wages is the normal rule.
ii)
Ordinarily, an employee or workman whose services are terminated and who is desirous of
getting back wages is required to either plead or at least make a statement before the
adjudicating authority or the Court of first instance that he/she was not gainfully employed or
was employed on lesser wages. If the employer wants to avoid payment of full back wages,
6828
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
then I has to plead and also lead cogent evidence to prove that the employee/workman wads
gainfully employed and was getting wages equal to the wages he/she wads drawing prior to
the termination of service. This is so because it is settled law that the burden of proof of the
existence of a particular fact lies on the person who makes a positive averments about its
existence. It is always easier to prove a positive fact than to prove a negative fact. Therefore,
once the employee shows that he was employed, the onus lies on the employer to specifically
plead and prove that the employee was gainfully employed and was getting the same or
substantially similar emoluments.”
16.
The Hon’ble Apex Court also held that different expressions are used for describing the consequence of
termination of a workman’s service/employment/engagement by way of retrenchment without complying with the
mandate of Section 25F of the Act. Sometimes it has been termed as ab initio void, sometimes as illegal per se, sometime
as nullity and sometimes as non est. Leaving aside the legal semantics, we have no hesitation to hold that termination of
service of an employee by way of retrenchment without complying with the requirement of giving one month’s notice or
pay in lieu thereof and compensation in terms of Section 25F (a) and (b) has the effect of rendering the action of the
employer and nullity and the employee is entitled to continue in employment as if his service was not terminated. (Anoop
Sharma Vs. Executive Engineer, Public Health Division No.1 Panipat (2010) 5 SCC 497).
17.
A Bench of three Judges of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Hindustan Tin Works Private Limited v.
Employees of Hindustan Tin Works Private Limited (1979) 2 SCC 80 held that relief of reinstatement with continuity of
service can be granted where termination of service is found to be invalid. It would mean that the employer has taken
away illegally the right to work of the workman contrary to the relevant law or in breach of contract and simultaneously
deprived the workman of his earnings. If thus the act of employer is found to be totally illegal and arbitrary, in that
eventuality the workman is required to be reinstated, with full back wages. Plain common sense also dictates that the
removal of an order terminating the services of workmen must ordinarily lead to the reinstatement of the services of the
workmen alongwith payment of back wages.
18.
However, Hon’ble Apex Court in the case General Manager, Haryana Roadways Vs. Rudan Singh,
reported as 2005 SCC (L&S) 716 observed as under :-
“8. There is no rule of thumb that in every case where the Industrial Tribunal gives a finding that the termination
of service was in violation of Section 25-F of the Act, entire back wages should be awarded. A host of factors
like the manner and method of selection and appointment i.e. whether after proper advertisement of the vacancy
or inviting applications from the employment exchange, nature of appointment namely, whether ad hoc, short
term, daily wage, temporary or permanent in character, any special qualification required for the job and the like
should be weighed and balanced in taking a decision regarding award of back wages. One of the important
factors which has to be taken into consideration is the length of service, which the workman had rendered
with the employer. If the workman has rendered a considerable period of service and his services are
wrongfully terminated, he may be awarded full or partial back wages keeping in view the fact that at this age
and the qualification possessed by him he may not be in a position to get another employment. However,
where the total length of service rendered by a workman is very small, the award of back wages for the
complete period i.e. from the date of termination till the date of the award, which our experience shows is
often quite large, would be wholly inappropriate. A regular service of permanent character cannot be
compared to short or intermittent daily wage employment though it may be for 240 days in a calander year.”
19.
Having regard to the legal position as discussed above and the fact that the claimant was performing duty to a
post of regular and perennial nature, this Tribunal is of the firm view that the claimant herein is entitled for
reinstatement into service on the same post, with 50 per cent back wages, iinasmuch as termination of the
claimant/workman is per-se illegal, particularly when the job is of regular and perennial nature and the
claimant/workman is not gainfully employed anywhere since after her termination by the Management. Award is passed
accordingly.
Date : 17.10.18
AVTAR CHAND DOGRA, Presiding Officer
नई िदल् ली, 26 नवम् बर, 2018
का.आ. 1774.—औ᳒ोिगक िववाद अिधिनयम 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण मᱶ केन्दर्ीय सरकार
िनदेशक, एम्स, नई िदल्ली और अन्य एवं उनके कमर्चारी के पर्बंधतंतर् के संब िनयोजकᲂ और उनके कमर्कारᲂ के बीच अनुबंध मᱶ िनिद᳥
औ᳒ोिगक िववाद मᱶ केन्दर्ीय सरकार औ᳒ोिगक अिधकरण एवं शर्म न्यायालय-2, चंडीगढ़ के पंचाट (संदभर् संख्या 25/2014) को
पर्कािशत करती है जो केन्दर्ीय सरकार को 30.10.2018 को पर्ा᳙ हुआ था।
[सं. जेड&22019/03/2013-आईआर(सी-II)]
राजᱶदर् जोशी, उप िनदेशक
New Delhi, the 26th November, 2018
S.O. 1774.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (ID. No. 25/2014) of the Central Government Industrial-Tribunal-cum
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6829
Labour Court-2, Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to
the Director, AIIMS, New Delhi & others and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on
30.10.2018.
[No. Z-22019/03/2013-IR(C-II)]
RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director
ANNEXURE
IN THE COURT OF SHRI AVTAR CHAND DOGRA : PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT No. 2 : CHANDIGARH
ID No. 25/2014
Mangal Singh,
S/o. late Kalyan Singh,
R/o. 71/1, LR Sharma Building,
Lower Sangti Summer Hills,
Shimla (HP).
…Workman/Claimant
Versus
1. The Director, AIIMS,
Ansari Nagar, New Delhi.
2. Senior Administrative Officer,
Estate Section, AIIMS,
Ansari Nagar, New Delhi.
3. Care Taker,
Raj Kumari Amrit Kaur Bhawan
Guest House, Summer Hills,
Shimla -5
…Management
AWARD
This award shall decide a reference which was made to this Tribunal by the appropriate Government vide its
letter No. L-42012/129/2014-IR(DU) dated 28.10.2014 under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of
Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(in short the Act) for adjudication of an industrial dispute, terms of which
are as under:
‘Whether the claimant Shri Mangal Singh leaving his job voluntarily w.e.f. 20.01.2014 and acceptance of
Management is justified and legal ? If not, what relief the workman entitled to and from which date?’’
2.
Both parties were put to notice and the claimant/workman Mangal Singh filed his statement of claim, with the
averments that he was engaged in the Guest House of the Management at Shimla as Cook on contract basis for a period
of six months w.e.f. 1/5/2012 and his tenure was extended from time to time, though no appointment letter has been
issued. He was performing his duties efficiently and regularly from 7 am to 9 pm. daily. It has been alleged that the
workman had asked the Management N.3 for two days’ leave on 3/1/2014 to get treatment of his ailing son who was
admitted in Deen Dayal Memorial Hospital but instead of granting leave the Management No.3 asked him to go from the
Guest House and his services were terminated on 4/1/2014 verbally and illegally in violation of Section 25-F of the Act.
On next date when he reported for duty, he was not allowed to enter the Guest House and to perform his duty. It has
also been alleged that though he completed more than 240 days in a calendar year, his services have been illegally
terminated in violation of Section 25-F of the Act , without issuing any show cause notice and without any compensation.
Prayer has been made for reinstatement into service with full back wages.
3.
Managements filed their joint written statement with the objection that the workman did not turn up to his work
voluntarily w.e.f. 1/1/2014 without any notice in advance and he had sent a letter dated 20/1/2014, intimating that he had
been engaged elsewhere and he has no objection on engagement of someone in his place and that he left the work
voluntarily. As such there is no no violation of the provisions of Section 25-F of the Act. Prayer has been made for
dismissal of the claim petition. Copy of the said letter dated 20/1/2014 has been filed on record.
4.
The claimant filed rejoinder wherein he denied the allegations of the Management and reiterated his own cases
as set up in the claim petition. It has been alleged that the claimant had never left his job at his own level, however,
under the pressure of Caretaker of RKAK Guest Hue, he left the work of cook and as such this is a case of retrenchment
and the Management had voluntarily terminated the services of the claimant without any reasons and rhyme. The
Caretaker pressurised the claimant to sign on blank papers as the same was required for release of his monthly salary.
5.
Perusal of the record shows that after filing of the written statement, the Management opted not to participate in
the proceedings and hence the matter was proceeded ex parte against the Management vide order dated 28/6/2016.
6830
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
6.
In order to prove his case, the claimant filed his evidence by way of affidavit (now marked as Ex.C-1) and his
testimony is in line with the averments made in the claim petition. In his pleadings and affidavit filed on record, the
claimant has specifically deposed that he had never left his job rather under the pressure of Caretaker of RKAK, Guest
House to sign on blank paper, as same was required by the Management at Delhi for release of his monthly salary.
According to his testimony, under the genuine belief, the workman had signed on the blank paper wherein reason for
leaving the job bty some other person was written. He also deposed that the Management had voluntarily terminated his
services without any reason and rhyme. The testimony of the claimant has gone unchallenged and unrebutted. The
Management has neither adduced any evidence in rebuttal to prove its case that the workman/claimant had himself
abandon the job, nor has proved the letter dated 20/1/2014 allegedly written by the workman voluntarily. Under these
circumstances, it can not be concluded that the claimant had himself abandon the job of the Management w.e.f.
20/1/2014 and that his services were legally terminated by the Management. The Management has not adduced any
evidence to show that before terminating the services of the workman, any notice or compensation in lieu of notice
period was given to the workman. This amounts to violation of the provisions of Section 25-F of the Act.
7.
There is long line of decisions of Hon’ble Apex Court as well as of various High Courts that provisions of
Section 25-F of the Act are mandatory in nature and termination of the workman from services in derogation of the
provisions of Section 25-F of the Act will render action of the Management to be illegal and void under the law.
8.
Since there is no evidence on record that any valid notice was issued by the Management to the workman at the
time of termination or in lieu of such notice, any compensation was paid to him, as such action of the Management in
terminating the services of the workman is held to be illegal and void.
9.
Now the residual question for consideration is whether the claimant is entitled to any incidental relief of
payment of back wages and/or reinstatement of service. It is proved on record that claimant was in the employment of
the Management before his termination on 20/1/2014. There is no show cause notice or memo issued to the
claimant/workman by the Management. Moreover, the job of the cook in the Guest House for which post the claimant
was engaged, is/was of perennial and regular nature. During the course of arguments, the claimant was present before
this Tribunal and he stated that he is not gainfully employed after his termination. The Management has not adduced
any evidence to show that the claimant is gainfully employed somewhere else or that he is in a position to make his both
ends meet by doing any work. Even if it is assumed that the claimant is doing some intermittent or adhoc work to make
his both ends meet, that would not itself amount to gainful employment. .
10.
The Hon’ble Apex Court in case “Deepali Gundu Surwase v. Kranti Junior Adhyapak Mahavidyalaya”
reported as (2013) 10 SCC 324 has held as under :
“The propositions which can be culled out from the aforementioned judgments are :
i)
In cases of wrongful termination of service, reinstatement with continuity of service and back
wages is the normal rule.
ii)
Ordinarily, an employee or workman whose services are terminated and who is desirous of
getting back wages is required to either plead or at least make a statement before the
adjudicating authority or the Court of first instance that he/she was not gainfully employed or
was employed on lesser wages. If the employer wants to avoid payment of full back wages,
then I has to plead and also lead cogent evidence to prove that the employee/workman wads
gainfully employed and was getting wages equal to the wages he/she wads drawing prior to
the termination of service. This is so because it is settled law that the burden of proof of the
existence of a particular fact lies on the person who makes a positive averments about its
existence. It is always easier to prove a positive fact than to prove a negative fact. Therefore,
once the employee shows that he was employed, the onus lies on the employer to specifically
plead and prove that the employee was gainfully employed and was getting the same or
substantially similar emoluments.”
11.
The Hon’ble Apex Court also held that different expressions are used for describing the consequence of
termination of a workman’s service/employment/engagement by way of retrenchment without complying with the
mandate of Section 25F of the Act. Sometimes it has been termed as ab initio void, sometimes as illegal per se, sometime
as nullity and sometimes as non est. Leaving aside the legal semantics, we have no hesitation to hold that termination of
service of an employee by way of retrenchment without complying with the requirement of giving one month’s notice or
pay in lieu thereof and compensation in terms of Section 25F (a) and (b) has the effect of rendering the action of the
employer and nullity and the employee is entitled to continue in employment as if his service was not terminated. (Anoop
Sharma Vs. Executive Engineer, Public Health Division No.1 Panipat (2010) 5 SCC 497).
12.
A Bench of three Judges of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Hindustan Tin Works Private Limited v.
Employees of Hindustan Tin Works Private Limited (1979) 2 SCC 80 held that relief of reinstatement with continuity of
service can be granted where termination of service is found to be invalid. It would mean that the employer has taken
away illegally the right to work of the workman contrary to the relevant law or in breach of contract and simultaneously
deprived the workman of his earnings. If thus the act of employer is found to be totally illegal and arbitrary, in that
eventuality the workman is required to be reinstated, with full back wages. Plain common sense also dictates that the
removal of an order terminating the services of workmen must ordinarily lead to the reinstatement of the services of the
workmen alongwith payment of back wages.
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6831
13.
However, Hon’ble Apex Court in the case General Manager, Haryana Roadways Vs. Rudan Singh,
reported as 2005 SCC (L&S) 716 observed as under :-
“8. There is no rule of thumb that in every case where the Industrial Tribunal gives a finding that the termination
of service was in violation of Section 25-F of the Act, entire back wages should be awarded. A host of factors
like the manner and method of selection and appointment i.e. whether after proper advertisement of the vacancy
or inviting applications from the employment exchange, nature of appointment namely, whether ad hoc, short
term, daily wage, temporary or permanent in character, any special qualification required for the job and the like
should be weighed and balanced in taking a decision regarding award of back wages. One of the important
factors which has to be taken into consideration is the length of service, which the workman had rendered
with the employer. If the workman has rendered a considerable period of service and his services are
wrongfully terminated, he may be awarded full or partial back wages keeping in view the fact that at this age
and the qualification possessed by him he may not be in a position to get another employment. However,
where the total length of service rendered by a workman is very small, the award of back wages for the
complete period i.e. from the date of termination till the date of the award, which our experience shows is
often quite large, would be wholly inappropriate. A regular service of permanent character cannot be
compared to short or intermittent daily wage employment though it may be for 240 days in a calander year.”
14.
Having regard to the legal position as discussed above and the fact that the claimant was performing duty to a
post of regular and perennial nature, this Tribunal is of the firm view that the claimant herein is entitled for
reinstatement into service on the same post, with 50 per cent back wages, iinasmuch as termination of the
claimant/workman is per-se illegal and the claimant/workman is not gainfully employed anywhere since after his
termination by the Management. Award is passed accordingly.
Date 17.10.18
AVTAR CHAND DOGRA , Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 27 uoEcj] 2018
का. आ. 1775-&औ᳒ोिगक िववाद अिधिनयम 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण मᱶ केन्दर्ीय सरकार
पोस्ट-मास्टर जनरल, हेड पोस्ट ऑिफस, पाली और अन्य एवं उनके कमर्चारी के पर्बंधतंतर् के संब िनयोजकᲂ और उनके
कमर्कारᲂ के बीच अनुबंध मᱶ िनिद᳥ औ᳒ोिगक िववाद मᱶ केन्दर्ीय सरकार औ᳒ोिगक अिधकरण एवं शर्म न्यायालय, जोधपुर के
पंचाट (संदभर् संख्या 01/2016) को पर्कािशत करती है जो केन्दर्ीय सरकार को 06.09.2018 को पर्ा᳙ हुआ था ।
[सं. एल&40011/25/2014-आईआर (डीयू)]
राजᱶदर् जोशी, उप िनदेशक
New Delhi, the 27th November, 2018
S.O. 1775.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (I.D. No. 01/2016) of the Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Jodhpur as
shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Post-Master General, Head Post
Office, Pali & others and their workman, which were received by the Central Government on 06.09.2018.
[No. L-40011/25/2014-IR (DU)]
RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director
vuqca/k
vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] tks/kiqj ¼jkt-½
ihBklhu vf/kdkjh & Jh vt; dqekj 'kekZ&1
vkj-,p-ts-,l-
vkS|ksfxd fookn ¼dsUnzh;½ la[;k% 01@2016
HkWojflag iq= Lo-Jh jkeiky flag] mez 52 o"kZ] HkwriwoZ nSfud osru
Hkksxh okVjeSu ¼xzqi&Mh deZpkjh½] ih-,e-ikyh gsM iksLV vkfQl
ikyh e.My] ikyh ekjokM] fuoklh 545 ckiw foLrkj]ikyh ekjokM-
---izkFkhZ
cuke
6832
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1-
iksLVekLVj tujy] gsM iksLV vkfQl ikyh ekjokM
2-
lqfizUVsUMsUV] iksLV vkfQl] ikyh ekjokM
3-
iksLV ekLVj] ,p0vks0 ikyh ekjokM
4-
;wfu;u vkQ bf.M;k tfj;s lsdzsVjh
fMikLVZesUV vkQ iksLV] fefuLVªh vkQ dE;wfuds'ku]
Mkd Hkou U;w fnYyh A
---vizkFkhZx.k
mifLFkfr%
1
izkFkhZ izfrfuf/k Jh vkyksd MksHkky mi-A
2
vizkFkhZx.k izfrfuf/k Jh 'kgukt [kkW mi-A
vf/kfu.kZ;%
fnukad% 30-06-2017
dsUnz ljdkj dh vksj ls tfj;s vf/klwpuk uEcj ,y&40011@ 25@2014&vkbZvkj ¼Mh;w½ fnukad 02-02-2015 }kjk
tks fookn vf/klwfpr fd;k x;k gS og bl izdkj gS&
**D;k izcU/ku Jheku iksLV ekLVj tujy] gsM iksLV vkfQl] lqizhUVsaUMsaV iksLV vkfQl o iksLV ekLVj ,p vks ikyh
ekjokM jkt0 }kjk deZdkj Jh HkWojflag iq= LoJh jkeiky flag dks fnukad 5-12-2011 ls lsok ls i`Fkd djus dh dk;Zokgh
oS/kkfud ,oa U;k;laxr gS] ;fn ugha rks izkFkhZ fdl jkgr dk vkSj dc ls ikus dk gdnkj gS \**
la{ksi esa rF; bl izdkj gS%&izkFkhZ us vf/klwfpr fookn ds lEcU/k esa viuk ekax i= is'k fd;kA izkFkhZ us vius ekax
i= esa dgk gS fd izkFkhZ&Jfed us vizkFkhZ fu;kstd laLFkku esa nSfud osruHkksxh deZpkjh ds :i esa okVjeSu ds :i esa lu
1990 ls fnukad 5-12-2011 rd viuh lsok, vfiZr dhA izkFkhZ ,d Jfed vkSj vizkFkhZ fu;kstd laLFkku ,d okf.kT;d o
vkS|ksfxd laLFkku gS ftu ij Je dkuwu ykxw gksrs gSA izkFkhZ&Jfed ds lkFk lkFk f'koflag ] f'koyky fi;ksu] tloUrflag
ckcw dk;Zjr FksA izkFkhZ&Jfed dks Hkqxrku isesUV okmpj ls Jfed ds inuke ls fd;k tkrk FkkA izkFkhZ&Jfed }kjk tc
le>ksrk okrkZ ds fy;s mifLFkfr jftLVj dh QksVks izfr o Hkqxrku okmpj dh QksVks izfr vizkFkhZ laLFkku ls ekaxh rks
izkFkhZ&Jfed dks miyC/k ugha djokbZ xbZ ftl ij lwpuk ds vf/kdkj ds rgr lwpuk ekaxus ij miyC/k djokbZ xbZA fnukad
7-6-2007 dks tkjh vkns'k ds vuqlkj okVj eSu dks feyus okys okVj HkRrs ds lEcU/k esa Fkk ml le; okVj eSu ds in ij
fu;qDr Jherh dykorh lsokfuo`Rr gks pqdh gS rFkk rRdkyhu v/kh{kd Jh lkseca'kh us izkFkhZ&Jfed dks eq[; dk;kZy;] ikyh
esa okVjeSu ds in ij yxk;k bl izdkj izkFkhZ&Jfed us gsM vkfQl esa okVjeSu ds in ij dk;Z djuk izkjEHk fd;kA izkFkhZ ds
eq[; dk;kZy; ds mifLFkfr jftLVj esa okVjeSu ds in ij gLrk{kj fd;s tkus yxsA izkFkhZ&Jfed ds lkFk lkFk izdk'k]
pqUuhyky] HkWojyky] eksguflag] x.ks'kjke] chatkjke] rstflag Hkh mifLFkfr jftLVj esa vius gLrk{kj djrs FksA izkFkhZ&Jfed dk
Hkqxrku isesUV okmpj ls fd;k tkrk Fkk drFkk Mh , dk Hkqxrku Hkh le; le; ij fd;k tkrk FkkA izkFkhZ&Jfed ds fof/k
fo:) lsok ls i`Fkd ds le; Hkqxrku okmpj la[;k 27 }kjk Hkqxrku fnukad 2-12-2011 dks fd;k x;k FkkA izkFkhZ dks vius
mPpkf/kdkfj;ksa ls dgk fd mls foHkkx esa dk;Z djrs gq;s 20 o"kZ ls vf/kd le; gks x;k gS mldh lsok fu;fer D;ksa ugh dh
tk jgh gS rc izkFkhZ dks vk'oklu fn;k x;k fd dk;Zokgh py jgh gS A bl ij izkFkhZ dh lsok, fu;fer djus dh ctk; mls
fnukad 5-12-2011 dks lsokeqDr dj fn;k x;kA izkFkhZ us lsok ls i`Fkd djus ls iwoZ 240 fnu fujUrj dk;Z fd;k mls /kkjk 25
,Q ds rgr u rks eqvkotk fn;k] u uksfVl fn;k u gh izkFkhZ&Jfed ls ofj"Brk lwph izdkf'kr dhA izkFkhZ&Jfed ls dfu"B
deZpkfj;ksa dks lsok esa j[kk x;kA bl izdkj vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e]1947 dh /kkjk 25&,Q]25&th ,oa 25&,p rFkk fu;e
77 o 78 ds izko/kkuksa dk mYya?ku fd;k x;k gSA izkFkhZ us Hkkjr ljdkj ds Je ea=ky;] vtesj esa fnukad 18-3-2014 dks
le>ksrk okrkZ gsrq izkFkZuk i= izLrqr fd;k ysfdu fnukad 20-5-2014 dks vizkFkh fu;kstd laLFkku us lsok esa cgky djus ls
euk dj fn;kA izkFkhZ&Jfed 21 o"kkZsZa ls okVjeSu ds in ij vizkFkhZ laLFkku esa dk;Z dj jgk gS
izkFkhZ dh vksj ls fuosnu fd;k gS fd vizkFkhZ fu;kstd ds ekSf[kd vkns'k fnukad 5-12-2011 dks fujLr Qjek;k tkos
rFkk izkFkhZ&Jfed dks lsok dh fujUrjrk esa osru rFkk lHkh iquykZHk ds lkFk lsok esa izfrLFkkfir djok;k tkos A
vizkFkhZ us vius tokc esa dgk gS fd izkFkhZ ds ekax i= esa vafdr rF;ksa ls badkj fd;k gS vkSj dgk gS fd izkFkhZ iz/kku
Mkd?kj ikyh esa iw.kZr;k ckg~; O;fDr ds :i esa ikuh Hkjus dk dk;Z dj jgk Fkk ftldks ikuh HkRrk fn;k tkrk Fkk mldks
fdlh Hkh in ij foHkkx esa fu;qfDr ugha nh xbZ] izkFkhZ iz/kku Mkd?kj ikyh esa ikuh Hkjus dk dk;Z djrk Fkk ftls ikuh HkRrk
fn;k tkrk Fkk tks fu/kkZfjr nj ls fn;k tkrk Fkk A Mkd egkfuns'kky; ubZ fnYyh ds i= fnukad 19-11-2010 dh vuqikyuk
esa ikuh Hkjus dh O;oLFkk miyC/k ,eMh,l LVkQ ls djokus ds funsZ'kkuqlkj izkFkhZ ls ikuh Hkjokuk cUn dj fn;kA izkFkhZ dks
ekg ds vUr esa fd;s x;s dk;Z ds vuqlkj ikuh HkRrk ,lhth&17 ij fd;k tkrk Fkk rFkk izkFkhZ ds uke ls dksbZ Hkqxrku
okmpj vyx ls tkjh ugh fd;k tkrk Fkk u gh mifLFkfr ckcr~ dksbZ fo'ks"k jftLVj j[kk tkrk FkkA ikyh iz/kku Mkd?kj esa
okVjeSu dk dksbZ in ugha Fkk rks ml ij mifLFkfr jftLVj esa gLrk{kj djokuk Lohdkj ugha gSA izkFkhZ ek= ckg~; O;fDr ds
:i esa dk;Zjr Fkk vkSj mls ikuh HkRrk fn;k tkrk Fkk rFkk foHkkxh; vkns'kkuqlkj ;g O;oLFkk cUn dh xbZ FkhA ckg~;
O;fDr;ksa ds lEcU/k esa dksbZ ofj"Brk lwph tkjh ugah dh tkrh Fkh vkSj u gh fdlh dkuwu dk mYya?ku gh fd;k x;k gSA izkFkhZ
ls fu;ekuqlkj gh dk;Z djk;k tkrk Fkk vkSj fu;ekuqlkj foHkkxh; vkns'kksa ls gh mDr O;oLFkk cUn dh xbZ FkhA izkFkhZ dh
lsok,s Mkd egkfuns'kky;] ubZ fnYyh ds i= fnukad 19-11-2010 vuqlkj vDVwcj 2011 ls lekIr dh xbZA
vizkFkhZ us vius tokc esa fuonsu fd;k gS fd izkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr ekax i= [kkfjt Qjek;k tkos A
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6833
izkFkhZ }kjk vizkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr tckc dk tckcqy tckc izLrqr djrs gq;s ekax i= esa of.kZr dFkuksa dh iqf"V
dh A
izkFkhZ dh vksj ls lk{; esa Lo;a HkWojflag dk 'kiFk&i= izLrqr fd;kA ftl ij vizkFkhZx.k us izfrijh{k.k fd;kA
vizkFkhZ dh vksj ls lk{; esa Mh vkj lqFkkj] v/kh{kd Mkd?kj] ikyh e.My]ikyh ekjokM dk 'kiFk&i= izLrqr fd;kA ftl ij
izkFkhZ us izfrijh{k.k fd;kA izkFkhZ dh vksj ls izn'kZ&1 ls 8 nLrkost dh izfr;ka izLrqr dh xbZA vizkFkhZ dh vksj ls izn'kZ&,1
nLrkost dh izfr izLrqr dh xbZA
nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl lquh xbZ i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA
vf/klwfpr fookn ij izkFkhZ dh vksj ls tks lk{; vkbZ gS mlesa Lo;a izkFkhZ HkWojflag us vius 'kiFk i= esa l'kiFk ;g
dFku fd;k gS fd og vizkFkhZ fu;kstd laLFkku esa lu 1990 ls fnukd 5-12-2011 rd okVjeSu ds in ij dk;Zjr Fkk vkSj
mlus yxkrkj mDr vof/k esa fcuk fdlh O;o/kku ds lsok;s nh A izkFkhZ ,d Jfed gS vkSj vizkFkhZ laLFkk m|ksx gSA izkFkhZ dk
dguk gS fd mldh M;wVh lqcg 8 cts ls 'kke 5 cts rd Fkh mlds lkFk f'koflag] f'koyky fi;ksu ,oa tloUrflag ckcw
oxSjg dk;Z djrs Fks mldks osru dk Hkqxrku isesUV okmpj ls fd;k tkrk Fkk ftlesa mldk uke in n'kkZ;k tkrk FkkA
i=koyh esa mDr okmpj layXu gSA izkFkhZ dks vizsy] 2008 ls fnlEcj 2011 rd ds Hkqxrku okmpj dh izekf.kr izfr miyC/k
djokbZ xbZ gSA fnukd 7-6-2007 dks tkjh vkns'k ds vuqlkj okVjeSu dks feyus okys okVj ,ykmUl ds lEcU/k esa FkkA ekax
lwph ds lkFk mDr vkns'k dh izfrfyfi dks Hkh is'k fd;k gSA fu;kstd laLFkk }kjk Mh , dk Hkqxrku Hkh le; le; ij fd;k
tkrk FkkA lsok lekfIr ds le; mls isesUV okmpj la[;k 27 fnukad 2-12-2011 ds }kjk Hkqxrku fd;k x;kA mldk dguk gS
fd mlus 20 o"kZ ls vf/kd vizkFkhZ laLFkku esa dk;Z djrs gq;s gks x;s gS ysfdu mldks fu;fer ugha fd;k x;k gS vkSj fnukad
5-12-2011 dks lsok esa fu;fer djus dh ctk; mls lsok ls VfeZusV dj fn;k x;k gSA mldk dguk gS fd ekeys esa vkS|ksfxd
fookn vf/kfu;e]1947 dh /kkjk 25&,Q]25&th ,oa 25&,p o fu;e 77 o 78 dh ikyuk ugha dh xbZ gSA vr% lsok i`Fkd
vkns'k fujLr fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA izkFkhZ dh vksj ls izn'kZ 1 ls 8 nLrkost is'k fd;s gSA izkFkhZ ls vizkFkhZ ds izfrfuf/k }kjk
izfrijh{k.k fd;k x;k gSA ftlesa mlus dgk gS fd dksbZ fyf[kr fu;qfDr i= is'k ugha fd;k gS D;ksafd mls ugah fn;k x;kA
ukSdjh ds fy;s izkFkhZ us fyf[kr fueU=.k ugha Hkstk] mlus dksbZ fyf[kr izkFkZuk i= okVjeSu ds in ij fu;qDr djus ds fy;s
vizkFkhZ dks ugha fn;kA izkFkhZ HkWojflg ls bl fcUnq ij dksbZ ftjg ugha dh xbZ gS fd mlus 1990 ls fnukad 5-12-2011 rd
okVjeSu ds in ij vizkFkhZ laLFkku esa dk;Z djrs gq;s fujUrj lsok,s ugha nh gks A bl fcUnq ij Hkh dksbZ ftjg ugha dh xbZ gS
fd izkFkhZ dks osru dk Hkqxrku tfj;s okmpj fd;k tkrk Fkk tks izkFkhZ us nLrkost ds :i esa is'k fd;s gSA izkFkhZ us yxkrkj
lsok esa 240 fnol ls vf/kd vof/k esa ,d dys.Mj o"kZ esa dk;Z fd;k gSA izkFkhZ ds 21 o"kZ dh lsok vof/k esa dksbZ lsok O;o/kku
jgk gks ,slk dksbZ izfrijh{k.k ugah fd;k x;k gSA ek= fu;qfDr i= ds lEcU/k esa ftjg dh xb gS vU; dksbZ lkjHkwr ftjg ugha
dh xbZ gSA
vizkFkhZ dh vksj ls Jh Mh vkj lqFkkj dks lk{; esa is'k fd;k x;k gS ftUgksaus ;g dgk gS fd izkFkhZ iz/kku Mkd?kj
dUVhtsUV isM O;fDr ds rkSj ij ikuh Hkjus dk dk;Z djrk Fkk ftls ikuh HkRrk fn;k tkrk Fkk fdlh in ij mldh fu;qfDr
ugah dh xbZ FkhA dUVhtsUV Q.M ls izkFkhZ dks osru dk Hkqxrku fd;k x;k gks ,slk dksbZ vkns'k vFkok ,slk dksbZ fjdkWMZ
vizkFkhZ dh vksj ls is'k ugh fd;k x;k gSA ;g Hkh Lohdkj fd;k x;k gS fd ikyh iz/kku Mkd?kj esa dUVhtsUV iSM O;oLFkk ij
ikuh Hkjus dk dk;Z dj jgk Fkk tks vc eYVh VkLd LVkQ ls djok;k tk jgk gS A izkFkhZ ls ikuh Hkjokuk cUn dj fn;k x;k
gSA izkFkhZ dk lsoki`FkDdj.k vkns'k tkjh ugha fd;k x;k gSA izkFkhZ }kjk yEcs le; ls ikuh Hkjus dk dk;Z djuk Lohdkj fd;k
gSA fnukad 7-6-2007 ikuh HkRrk izfrekg Hkqxrku djus ckcr~ ek= ,d Lohd`fr vkns'k Fks bl esa fdlh in ,oa izkFkhZ ds uke dk
fooj.k vafdr ugha gSA D;ksafd izkFkhZ lu 1990 ls yxkrkj dk;Zjr FkkA izkFkhZ ckgjh O;fDr ds :i esa iz/kku Mkd?kj] ikyh ij
ikuh Hkjus dk dk;Z dj jgk FkkA vizkFkhZ ds bl xokg ls izkFkhZ ds izfrfuf/k }kjk ftjg dh xbZ gsA ftlesa mlus ;g Lohdkj
fd;k gS fd fnukad 16-2-2016 dks crkSj v/kh{kd Mkd ikyh e.My esa dk;Zjr gSA ftjg esa mlus Lohdkj fd;k gS fd izkFkhZ
iksLV ekLVj ikyh ds v.Mj esa ikuh Hkjus dk dke djrk FkkA izkFkhZ dks muds ;gka ikuh fiykus dh txg muds ;gka
dUVhtsUV ¼vkdfLed :i ls ½ yxk;k x;k FkkA izkFkhZ dks ekg dh lekfIr ij osru nsrs Fks vkSj fu;ekuqlkj mls Mh, Hkh fn;k
tkrk FkkA ;g lsysjh gsM ls fn;k tkrk FkkA izkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr izn'kZ 1 ls 4 ds ist la[;k 8 ls 65 muds foHkkx ds okmpj
gS ;g Lohdkj fd;k gS ftlesa fy[kh bckjr jgh gSA ;g Hkh Lohdkj fd;k gS fd dksbZ fu;qfDr i= tkjh ugha fd;k x;k gS
ekSf[kd :i ls yxk;k x;k FkkA gVkus ls iwoZ dksbZ uksfVl ugah fn;k x;kA ;g Hkh Lohdkj fd;k gS fd izkFkhZ us viuh fu;qfDr
frfFk 1990 ls fnukad 2-12-2011 mls gVkus tkus rd fcuk fdlh O;o/kku ds muds ;gk ikuh Hkjus dk dke fd;k gSA
mijksDr nksuksa i{kksa dh lk{; ls fLFkfr ;g mHkj dj vkrh gS fd Lohd`r :i ls izkFkhZ vizkFkhZ laLFkku esa okVjeSu ds
in ij ikuh Hkjus o ikuh fiykus dk dk;Z djrk FkkA izkFkhZ dks osru en ls osru fn;k tkrk Fkk] ;g Hkh vizkFkhZ laLFkku dh
vksj ls Lohdkj fd;k x;k gSA ;g Hkh Lohdkj fd;k x;k gS fd lu 1990 ls fnukad 5-12-2011 rd izkFkhZ us vuojr :i ls
okVj eSu ds in ij lsok, nh gS vkSj mlus 21 o"kZ dh vof/k esa vizkFkhZ laLFkku us fu;fer ugha fd;k gS cfYd mls fnukad
5-12-2011 dks fcuk fdlh uksfVl ds lsok ls i`Fkd dj fn;k gSA izkFkhZ dk dk;Z vlUrks"kizn jgk gks ,slk Hkh vizkFkhZ dh vksj ls
dksbZ lk{; izLrqr ugha dh xbZ gSA izkFkhZ ds fo:) dksbZ vuq'kklukRed dk;Zokgh dh xbZ gks ,slk Hkh vizkFkhZ dk ekeyk ugha
gSA izkFkhZ }kjk dh xbZ ikuh dh lsok yxkrkj pyus okyh lsokvksa esa ls ,d gSA vizkFkhZ laLFkku esa u dsoy LVkQ dks ikuh
fiykus dh vko';drk gksrh gS cfYd ogka vkus okys vke xzkgd dks ikuh fiykuk vR;Ur vko';d gSA izkFkhZ dks gVkdj eYVh
VkLd LVkQ QkslZ ls dke ysuk vkSj gVkus ls iwoZ mls dksbZ NaVuh eqvkotk ugha nsuk vkSj fnukad 5-12-2011 dks mls fcuk
fdlh fyf[kr lsok lekfIr vkns'k ds ekSf[kd :i ls lsok ls i`Fkd djuk vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e]1947 dh /kkjk 25,Q dk
?kksj mYya?ku gSA vizkFkhZ laLFkk dh vksj ls izkFkhZ dks lsok ls i`Fkd fd;s tkus ls iwoZ dksbZ ofj"Brk lwph ugha cukbZ xbZ gSA
izkFkhZ dks fudkyus ds i'pkr~ vU; O;fDr dks eYVh VkLd QkslZ okys dks ikuh fiykus o ikuh Hkjus ds fy;s j[kk x;k gSA vr%
izkFkhZ ds ekeys esa vizkFkhZ laLFkk us vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e]1947 dh /kkjk 25&th ,oa 25&,p ,oa fu;e 77 o 78 dk Hkh
mYya?ku fd;k gSA
6834
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
vizkFkhZ dh vksj ls ;g rdZ izLrqr fd;k x;k gS fd izkFkhZ vkdfLed deZpkjh gtS vkSj mldh fu;qfDr ikVZ VkbZe dh
xbZ gS vr% mls fu;fer lsok esa ugha fy;k tk ldrkA esjh jk; esa ;g rdZ [kkfjt fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA ekuuh; mPpre
U;k;ky; }kjk , vkbZ vkj 2011 ,l lh MCY;w ist 3455 nsosUnzflag cuke E;wfufliy dkmfUly lkuksj esa ;g fl}kUr
izfrikfnr fd;k x;k gS fd ikVZVkbZe deZpkjh] vuqcfU/kr deZpkjh] vLFkkbZ o vkdfLed deZpkjh vkS|ksfxd fookn ds rgr
*Jfed* dh Js.kh esa vkrs gSA
ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk 2016 yscj b.M0 dslst ist 3174 phQ tujy eSustj ,l ch vkbZ cuke
dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd ,oa Je U;k;ky;] pSUubZ ds ekeys eas ;g fl)kUr izfrikfnr fd;k fd Employee rendered 20
Years of service, termination of his services on ground that the work was outsourced without complying with provisions
of S. 25F. Not proper because even if an employee is temporary or daily wager, if he has successfully worked for 240
days in preceding calendar year, employee is entitled to benefit of provisions of S. 25F.
ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk 2009 ,l lh ist 309 fMfotuy eSustj U;w bf.M;k ,';ksjsUl dEiuh cuke ,0
'kadjkfyaxe] 2012 ¼132½ ,Q ,y vkj ist 571 dkuflag cuke ftyk vk;qZosn vkfQlj o vU;] ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp
U;k;ky; ds fu.kZ; jktLFkku jkT; cuke fxjhjkt izlkn ds ekeys esa o vU; fu.kZ;ksa esa ikVZVkbZe deZpkjh dks Hkh Jfed dk
ntkZ fn;k x;k gS vr% izkFkhZ vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e]1947 ds rgr laj{k.k izkIr djus dk vf/kdkjh gSA
mijksDr foospu o fof/kd izko/kkuksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq;s izkFkhZ dks fnukad 5-12-2011 dks lsok ls i`Fkd djuk mfpr
,oa oS/k ugha gSA izkFkhZ dk ekSf[kd lsok i`Fkd vkns'k fnukad 5-12-2011 vikLr fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA izkFkhZ ftl in ls gVk;k
x;k gS mlh okVjeSu ds in ij iqu% iwoZlsok 'krksZ ds vk/kkj ij iqu%fu;qfDr izkIr djus dk vf/kdkjh gSA izkFkhZ dh lsok,
fujUrj ekus tkus ;ksX; gSA izkFkhZ vf/klwfpr fookn dh frfFk fnukad 2-2-2015 ls iwoZHk`fr ds :i esa mldks fu;qDr fd;s tkus
rd 50 izfr'kr iwoZHk`fr jkf'k vizkFkhZx.k ls izkFkhZ dks fnykbZ tkuk mfpr le>k tkrk gSA izkFkhZ leLr ifjykHk mldh
fu;qfDr fnukad ls izkIr djus ;ksX; ik;k tkrk gSA
vf/kfu.kZ;%
vr% ;g vf/kfu.kZ; fd;k tkrk gS fd &
1-
izkFkhZ Jh HkWojflag iq= LoJh jkeiky flag dks fu;kstd izcU/ku Jheku iksLV ekLVj tujy] gsM iksLV vkfQl]
lqizhUVsaUMsaV iksLV vkfQl o iksLV ekLVj ,p vks ikyh ekjokM jkt- }kjk fnukad 5-12-2011 dks lsok i`Fkd fd;k tkuk mfpr
,oa oS/k ugha gSA
2-
izkFkhZ dks rqjUr lsok esa iquZLFkkfir fd;k tkosA izkFkhZ dh lsok, fujUrj ekuh tkosA
3-
izkFkhZ vf/klwfpr fookn dh frfFk fnukad 2-2-2015 ls mldks iqu% fu;qDr fd;s tkus rd 50izfr'kr iwoZHk`fr jkf'k
vizkFkhZ ls izkFkhZ dks fnykbZ tkrh gSA izkFkhZ leLr ifjykHk mldh fu;qfDr fnukad ls izkIr djus dk vf/kdkjh gSA
bl vf/kfu.kZ; dks izdk'kukFkZ Hkkjr ljdkj dks izsf"kr fd;k tkosA
;g vkns'k esjs }kjk fyfic} djok;k tkdj vkt fnukad 30-06-2017 dks [kqys U;k;ky; esa gLrk{kj dj mn~?kksf"kr
fd;k x;kA
vt; dqekj 'kekZ&1] U;k;k/kh'k
नई िदल् ली, 29 नवम् बर, 2018
का.आ. 1776.—राष् टर्पित, शर्ी मृनमोय कुमार भᲵाचाजᱮ, पीठासीन अिधकारी, केन् दर्ीय सरकार औ᳒ोिगक
अिधकरण-सह-शर्म न् यायालय, गुवाहाटी को िदनांक 22.11.2018 से छ: माह तक की अविध अथवा िनयिमत आधार पर पद
के भरे जाने तक अथवा अगले आदेश तक, जो भी पहले हो केन् दर्ीय सरकार ᬫ᳒ोिगक अिधकरण सह-शर्म-न् यायालय,
आसनसोल के पीठासीन अिधकारी के पद का अितिरक् त पर्भार सौपते हᱹ।
[सं. अ-11016/03/2015-सीएलएस-II]
अजय मिलक, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 29th November, 2018
S.O. 1776.—The President is pleased to entrust the additional charge of the post of Presiding Officer, Central
Government Industrial Tribunal-cul-Labour Court, Asansol to Shri Mrinmoy Kumar Bhattacharjee, presiding Officer,
Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Guwahati for a period of six months with effect from
22.11.2018 or till the post is filled on regular basis or until further orders, whichever is the earliest.
[No. A-11016/03/2015-CLS-II]
AJAY MALIK, Under Secy.
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6835
नई िदल् ली, 30 नवम् बर, 2018
का. आ. 1777-&औ᳒ोिगक िववाद अिधिनयम 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण मᱶ केन्दर्ीय सरकार
मेससर् एयरपोटर् अथॉिरटी ऑफ इिण्डया के पर्बंधतंतर् के संब िनयोजकᲂ और उनके कमर्कारᲂ के बीच अनुबंध मᱶ िनिद᳥
औ᳒ोिगक िववाद मᱶ केन्दर्ीय सरकार औ᳒ोिगक अिधकरण एवं शर्म न्यायालय-2, मुम्बई के पंचाट (संदभर् संख्या 3/2014) को
पर्कािशत करती है जो केन्दर्ीय सरकार को 20.11.2018 को पर्ा᳙ हुआ था।
[सं. एल&11011/55/2004-आईआर (एम)]
डी. के. िहमांशु, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 30th November, 2018
S.O. 1777.—In ursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 3/2014) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour
Court-2, Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the
management of M/s. Airports Authority of India and their workman, which was received by the Central Government
on 20.11.2018.
[No. L-11011/55/2004-IR (M)]
D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 2, MUMBAI
PRESENT: M.V. DESHPANDE, Presiding Officer/Judge
COMPLAINT NO. CGIT-2/ 3 of 2014
Arising out of
[Reference No. CGIT-2/ 17 of 2007]
PARTIES:
1. Shri Rushikesh Chandrakant Kolambekar,
2. Shri Dayanad R. Khavale,
3. Shri Bajrang Vitthal Mane,
4. Shri Vinod Harishchandra Jadhav,
5. Shri Syryakant Giridhar Gawade,
6. Rajesh Shrirang Owale,
7. Shri Parshuram P. Yernalekar,
8. Shri Sandeep Vasant Shendge,
9. Shri Swapnil Haridas Solse,
10. Shri P. Velmurgan,
11. Shri Amol R. Tambe,
12. Shri Manoj V. Tanpure,
13. Shri Madan Krishna Vengurlekar,
14. Shri Zahir Z. Ahmed
C/o. Shri J.H. Sawant,
Advocate
Mumbai .
:
COMPLAINANTS
6836
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
V/s
Airports Authority of India,
Through
The Regional Executive Director,
Having office at New Airport Colony,
Vileparle [East],
Mumbai- 400 099.
:
OPPOSITE PARTY
APPEARANCES:
FOR THE Complainants
: Mr. J. H. Sawant, Advocate
FOR THE OPPOSITE PARTY
: No Appearance
Mumbai, dated the 22nd October, 2018
AWARD
1.
This is an application under Section 33 (A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 against the Opposite Party on
the ground that the Opposite Party has refused the work, wages and all consequential benefits to the complainants
covered and concerning the adjudicating proceedings in Reference No. CGIT-2/ 17 of 2007 w.e.f. 3.4.2007. As such the
Opposite Party has altered the conditions of services of the workmen to their prejudice during the pendency of said
adjudicating proceedings.
2.
It is the case of the Complainants that by order dt. 9.2.2007 the Central Govt. referred the industrial dispute for
adjudication to this tribunal in the following schedule.
SCHEDULE
“Whether the industrial dispute by the Airports Kamgar Union against the management of Airport Authority of
India for permanent absorption of Sh. Rushikesh C. Kolambekar and 13 other workmen [list attached] justified ?
If so, what relief the workmen are entitled to ?”
3.
The Opposite Party had contravened the provisions made u/s. 33 of I.D. Act, 1947 and has altered the conditions
of services of the complainants during the pendency of the proceedings by refusing the complaints work, wages and
consequential benefits w.e.f. 3.4.07 till date without express permission of this tribunal. The Opposite Party and its
agents employed the other persons in place of complainants to do regular nature of work of the Opposite Party that was
being attended by the complainants through agents of the Opposite Party in the premises of Opposite Party and under
direct supervision of Opposite Party who was real employer of the complainants. The complainants are in continuous
employment of the Opposite Party and therefore they have been subjected to unemployment, hardship and unjust by the
Opposite Party. They are therefore asking to declare that the Opposite Party has contravene the provisions of section 33
of the I.D. Act, 1947 by refusing work, wages and consequential benefits to the complainants / workmen w.e.f. 3.4.07
during the pendency of adjudication proceedings under Reference No. CGIT-2/ 17 of 2007 and direct the Opposite Party
to make the payment of wages to the complainants / workmen w.e.f. 3.4.07 and allow them to resume their duties.
4.
Opposite Party remained absent though duly served. No say or written statement is filed by the Opposite Party.
Complainants have filed documents and affidavit of concerned workmen. There is no cross-examination directed against
him. As such complaint proceeded ex-parte against the Opposite Party.
5.
Following points arise for my determination and my findings thereon for the reasons to follow are as under
Sr.
No.
Points
Findings
1.
Whether it is proved by the complainants that the Opposite Party has
refused the work, wages & benefits to the complainants and concerning
the adjudication proceedings in Reference No. CGIT-2/ 17 of 2007 w.e.f.
3.4.2007 without permission of the tribunal ?
Yes
2.
What order ?
As per final order
REASONS
Point No.1:
6.
The complainants have relied upon following documents in respect of their work with the Opposite Party and
dis-continuation of their services by the Opposite Party w.e.f. 3.4.07 i.e. during the pendency of adjudication proceedings
before this tribunal in Reference No. CGIT-2/ 17 of 2007. The documents are produced below Ex.6 / 1 to 30. The
document at Sr. No. 1 & 2 are payment vouchers showing that AAI made the payment to contractors for being paid to the
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6837
workers namely Mane, Kaule, Gavande & Jadhav. Letter dt. 4.9.01 produced below Ex.6 / 3 shows that daily wage
workers who have petitioned the High Court and are protected by the court are required to give necessary tokens for
allowing them daily wage workers in operational area for maintenance of the tower lighting. Documents at Sr. Nos. 5 to
9 below Ex.6 are the office notes showing the names of the employees, designation, number of days present for work,
period of leave etc. including the absentee statement. Document at Sr. Nos. 15 to 21 are the office notes and the
document at Sr. No. 22 is the copy of judgment of WP No. 21 / 2001 giving liberty to the concerned workmen to move
the conciliation machinery and directing the appropriate Govt. to consider the aspect as regards the making reference to
the tribunal and by way of interim order the workmen were protected for 3 months. At Sr. No. 44, there is order of
reference whereby the concerned workmen are asking for permanent absorption and the said reference is pending. At Sr.
No. 31 below Ex.6, there is statement of claim filed by the concerned workmen. At Sr. No. 22, there is application for
grant of interim relief and at Sr. No. 33 there is affidavit filed by the concerned workmen in respect of interim relief
application. The said reference is thus pending.
7.
The concerned workmen in his affidavit has stated that during pendency of reference the Opposite Party has
altered the conditions of services of the complainants by refusing work, wages and benefits w.e.f. 3.4.07 without
permission of the tribunal. This version of the concerned workmen has gone unchallenged as there is no cross
examination directed against him. It will have to be said that this unchallenged version of the concerned workmen has to
be accepted to come to the conclusion that Opposite Party has violated the provisions of section 33 of I.D. Act by
refusing the work, wages and benefits to the complainants and thereby altered the conditions of services of the concerned
workmen / complainants to their prejudice during the pendency of the said adjudication proceedings.
8.
Learned Counsel for the concerned workmen / complainants submitted that as per section 33, no employer shall
in regard to any matter connected with the dispute alter to the prejudice of the workmen concerned in the dispute
conditions of services applicable to them immediately before commencement of such proceedings. He also refers to
section 33 (A) to submit that where the employer contravene the provisions of section 33 during the pendency of
conciliation proceedings before Board or Arbitrator, Labour Court, Tribunal or National Tribunal, the employee
aggrieved by such contravention may make complaint in writing in the prescribed manner and the tribunal on receipt of
such complaint shall adjudicate upon the complaint as if it were dispute referred to or pending before it. He seeks to rely
on the decision in case of Automobile Products of India Ltd. & Ors. V/S. Rakmaji Bala & Ors. – AIR 1955 SC 258 to
submit that tribunal has jurisdiction to go into the minutes of the complaint and grant appropriate relief. Submission is
also to the effect that during the pendency of dispute before the tribunal service condition of the concerned workmen
cannot be altered to their prejudice without permission of the tribunal. The reliance in the context is placed on the
decision in case of Bhavnagar municipality V/S. Alibhai Karimbhai & Ors. – 1977 I LLJ 407 SC.
9.
Considering un-challenged facts, evidence and the legal position, it appears to me that the Opponents have
contravened the provisions of section 33 (1) (A) during the pendency of reference by refusing work, wages and
consequential benefits to the workmen w.e.f. 3.4.07 without permission of the tribunal. Point No. is therefore answered
accordingly.
10.
In view of that, I pass the following order:
Order
1. It is declared that Opposite Party AAI has contravened the provisions u/s. 33 of the I.D. Act by refusing
work, wages and benefits to the complainants w.e.f. 3.4.07 during the pendency of adjudication
proceedings in Reference No. CGIT-2/ 17 of 2007.
2. The Opposite Party is directed to make payment of wages & benefits to the complainants / workmen w.e.f.
3.4.2007 and allow them to resume their duties.
Date: 22.10.2018
M.V. DESHPANDE, Presiding Officer
नई िदल् ली, 30 नवम् बर, 2018
का. आ. 1778-&औ᳒ोिगक िववाद अिधिनयम 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण मᱶ केन्दर्ीय सरकार
मेससर् एयरपोटर् अथॉिरटी ऑफ इिण्डया के पर्बंधतंतर् के संब िनयोजकᲂ और उनके कमर्कारᲂ के बीच अनुबंध मᱶ िनिद᳥
औ᳒ोिगक िववाद मᱶ केन्दर्ीय सरकार औ᳒ोिगक अिधकरण एवं शर्म न्यायालय-2, मुम्बई के पंचाट (संदभर् संख्या 3/2018) को
पर्कािशत करती है जो केन्दर्ीय सरकार को 20.11.2018 को पर्ा᳙ हुआ था।
[सं. एल&11012/7/2004-आईआर (एम)]
डी. के. िहमांशु, अवर सिचव
6838
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
New Delhi, the 30th November, 2018
S.O. 1778.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 3/2018) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour
Court-2, Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the
management of M/s. Airports Authority of India and their workman, which was received by the Central Government
on 20.11.2018.
[No. L-11012/7/2004-IR (M)]
D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.2, MUMBAI
PRESENT : M. V. Deshpande, Presiding Officer
REFERENCE NO.CGIT-2/ 03 of 2018
EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA
The Airport Director,
Airport Authority of India [IA]
Chatrapati Shivaji International Airport,
Mumbai – 400 099,
MUMBAI.
AND
THEIR WORKMEN
Shri V.B. Tiwari, Sr. Auto Mechanics [SG],
502, Rahul Apartment, Behind Mukund Nagar,
Kadamwadi, Andheri [E],
Mumbai – 400 059,
MUMBAI.
APPEARANCES:
FOR THE EMPLOYER
:
Ms. Geeta Raju Advocate
FOR THE WORKMEN
:
Mr. J. H. Sawant Advocate
Mumbai, the 17th October, 2018
AWARD PART – I
1.
This is reference made by the Central Government in exercise of powers under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and
sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 vide Government of India, Ministry of Labour &
Employment, New Delhi vide its order No. L-11012/7/2004 – IR (M) dated 11.06.2004. The terms of reference given in
the schedule are as follows :
“Whether the action of the management of Airport Director, Airports Authority of India (IAD), Mumbai in
dismissing Shri V.B. Tiwari, Sr. Auto Mechanics [SG] from services with immediate effect vide Memorandum
dated 10.12.2003, is justified, proper and in proportionate to the alleged charges of misconduct ? If not, to what
relief the workman Shri Tiwari is entitled and from which date and what other directions are necessary in the
matter ?“
2.
After the receipt of the reference, both the parties were served with the notices. They appeared through their
respective representatives.
3.
The concerned workman has filed statement of claim. According to the concerned workman, he was employed
by the management of Airport Authority of India, Mumbai w.e.f. 31.12.1975 in the capacity of Auto Electrician Gr. I. He
was further promoted to the post of Auto Mechanic in 1978, Sr. Auto Mechanic in 1990 and Auto Mechanic [SG] Sr.
grade w.e.f. 12.7.98.
4.
It is his case that the management issued show case notice dt. 27.5.96 to him alleging therein that he was
running private garage at AAI land near airport. The garage was located in Survey No. 35 of Village Marole at Marole
Technical area, Marole Pipeline. This private garage was on the land belonging to AAI, Mumbai airport and he had
unauthorisedly encroached the same. The garage was run by the concerned workman in the name of his wife and the said
act amounted to gross misconduct u/s. 5 (i)(v)(x) of IAAI Employees [Conduct, Discipline & Appeal] Regulations, 1987.
5.
According to him, he was issued charge sheet on 11.10.96. He replied the said charge sheet on 28.10.96 and
denied the charges. Management conducted departmental enquiry against him. Enquiry officer submitted his report to
the disciplinary authority. The disciplinary authority by order dt. 1.2.2000 imposed upon him the penalty of dismissal of
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6839
service of AAI with immediate effect. He preferred appeal dt. 30.6.2000 to the Appellate Authority against the dismissal
order. The Appellate Authority by its order dt. 29.3.01 set aside the dismissal order and ordered second enquiry by
issuing fresh charge sheet. However, the Appellate Authority placed him under suspension w.e.f. 1.2.2000 by way of
victimization.
6.
It is then case of the concerned workman that he was issued fresh charge sheet vide Memorandum dt. 7.1.01 on
same charges and allegations as were leveled earlier. It was alleged that he encroached the management’s land i.e.
Kondivita Village, Survey No. 104 situated at Marole Pipeline and motor garage in the name of his wife Smt. Sushila
Tiwari was in existence. He denied the charges. The disciplinary authority ordered departmental enquiry. The
departmental proceedings were conducted. E.O. submitted his report on 14.10.02. The disciplinary authority on the basis
of findings given by E.O. by his order dt. 10.12.03 imposed upon the workman the penalty of dismissal from the services
of AAI with immediate effect treating the period from 1.2.2000 to 9.12.03 as not treated as a period spent on duty. The
concerned workman preferred an appeal dt. 30.12.03 to the Appellate Authority.
7.
It is the case of the concerned workman that it was irregular and illegal on the part of management to initiate
second enquiry on same & similar charges of the first enquiry which was set aside by the Appellate Authority. It was
illegal to place him under suspension w.e.f. 1.2.2000. E.O. did not conduct disciplinary proceedings in accordance with
the principles of natural justice. E.O. did not cause production of original documents which was exhibited by the E.O. as
Ex. 2 C document dt. 12.2.03 and relied upon the same though it was not duly proved. Findings of the E.O. to the effect
that the land in question i.e. land at Survey No. 104 belongs to the management is perverse. Findings of the E.O. are
perverse since document Ex. 2 C i.e. Kami Jastic Patrak pertaining to land Survey No. 34 was a forged document and as
such the E.O. did not give any clear finding as to the ownership of land in question. The E.O. ignored to consider the
document produced by the concerned workman to establish that the land in question does not belong to management. As
such the charges as against him are not proved. Findings of the E.O. are not based on the evidence and therefore the
action of the management in dismissing him from the services w.e.f. 10.12.03 is illegal and unjustified.
8.
The workman is therefore asking for reinstatement in service w.e.f. 10.12.03 with full back wages,
consequential benefits treating the period of suspension as period on duty for all the purposes, costs & compensation.
9.
The first party management resisted claim by filing written statement. It is contended that this Industrial
Tribunal has not been sponsored by the union of the workman of the authority or by the substantial number of workmen
employed by it. As such industrial dispute does not exists in order to invoke the provisions of section 2 (k) of I.D. Act,
1947.
10.
It is then contented that the workman has raised industrial dispute over his demand for reinstatement in service
vide his letter dt. 4.2.04. The industrial dispute was raised much before expiry of period of 3 months of date of appeal
required by the Appellate Authority to pass the appropriate order. The workman thereafter during the pendency of
reference moved the Hon’ble High Court of Bombay by filing writ petition in which he had prayed for relief of
reinstatement in service with full back wages and consequential benefits etc. The Hon’ble High Court directed the
appellate authority to decide the appeal dt. 27.12.03 within one month from the date of receipt of order. In that
circumstances the order of reference dt. 11.6.04 is pre-mature as the same was obtained by him during the pendency of
appeal.
11.
According to the first party management, show cause notice was issued to the workman under the signature of
Assistant Manager with approval of Airport Director. The workman replied the said show cause notice by explanation
dt. 4.6.96. The workman was issued the charge sheet by Memorandum dt. 11.10.96 along with statement of imputation of
misconduct in support of article of charges framed against him vide Annexure – I, list of documents Annexure – II, list of
witnesses Annexure – III. He was issued memo dt. 17.10.97 fixing the preliminary enquiry on 13.11.97. The domestic
enquiry was held against him. He was given full opportunity to cross examine the witnesses examined on behalf of the
Airport authority and to meet the charges leveled against him. E.O. submitted his report to the management on 8/10-10-
99. Airport Director being the disciplinary authority by order dt. 1.2.2000 imposed upon the workman the penalty of
dismissal from services of AAI with immediate effect. The workman submitted his appeal addressed to the Chairman of
the authority against the dismissal order. The appellate authority set aside the penalty of dismissal order dt. 1.2.2000 and
ordered re-enquiry by issuing the fresh charge sheet as the appellate authority observed that proper records were not
produced during the enquiry to establish the ownership of the land. It was further observed by the appellate authority
that the workman also did not produce original relevant and proper records during the enquiry proceedings to dis-prove
the allegations though City Civil Court in order dt. 1.9.98 in Suit No. 5439 / 1987 referred the statement of his wife that
the land in question belong to authority. His suspension was therefore continued with retrospective effect from the date
of his dismissal by order dt. 1.2.2000 till the case was decided by the disciplinary authority.
12.
It is then case of the first party that 2nd charge sheet was issued by Memorandum dt. 7.8.2001 adding two
charges.
I)
committing fraud and dishonesty in connection with the property of AAI and causing damage to the
said property and
II)
refusing to surrender PIC No. N16256M in the department thereby willfully disobeying the lawful and
reasonable orders of superiors and breach of security.
The charge sheet was including the statement of imputation of misconduct, list of documents, list of witnesses.
The workman by his reply denied the charges. The departmental enquiry was held into the charges leveled
6840
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
against him by memo dt. 7.8.2001 and was concluded on 20.6.02. Mr. Y. K. Goyal, Dy. G.M. [Cargo] was
appointed as E.O. to conduct the enquiry. During the course of enquiry proceedings, originals of all the
management documents were shown to the workman for his perusal and verification. He was given opportunity
to admit or deny each article of charges of misconduct. He denied the charges leveled against him. Seven
witnesses on behalf of the management were produced at the enquiry by the Presenting Officer. After evidence
on behalf of the management both oral and documentary was over, the workman was asked to submit the list of
defence witnesses and the documents in support of the case to which he replied in the negative. But thereafter
he produced the documents in support of his defence. It is thus denied by the first party that the departmental
enquiry was conducted in violation of principles of natural justice.
13.
According to the first party management, the EO submitted enquiry report to the management on 16.10.02.
Thereafter by order dt. 10.12.03, the concerned workman was dismissed from services by Airport Director in exercise of
the powers conferred by Regulation 27 of the Regulations. Airport Director perused the enquiry proceedings recorded by
the E.O. as well as enquiry report and agreed with the conclusion arrived by E.O. The copy of enquiry report was given
to the concerned workman. It is thus denied by the first party that the findings of the E.O. are perverse and based on no
evidence. The workman thereafter filed appeal before the Appellate Authority praying to set aside & quash the dismissal
order. The appeal was not decided by the Appellate Authority since during the pendency of appeal, the concerned
workman initiated the conciliation proceedings before the conciliation officer. The conciliation officer recorded the
failure of conciliation and failure report dt. 19.4.04 was sent by him to the Ministry of Labour, Govt. of India, New Delhi
for adjudication of industrial dispute.
14.
It is thus contention of the first party that the action of the management in dismissing the concerned workman
from the services w.e.f. 10.12.03 is fair, proper, bonafide & legal and the workman is not entitled for reinstatement in
service w.e.f. 10.12.03 with full back wages, consequential reliefs etc. It has thus sought dismissal of reference.
15.
By filing rejoinder the concerned workman reiterated that the land in question belongs to Central Govt. and not
to AAI. Land Survey No. 104 has been now merged into CTS No. 272 which belongs to Central Govt. and therefore the
findings of the E.O. are totally perverse and no disciplinary action can be taken against him on the basis of perverse
findings. The Estate Officer appointed under Public Premises Act has also closed the proceedings initiated against the
wife of concerned workman in the year 1998 knowingly fully well that the land in question does not belong to AAI.
16.
Following issues are framed on 24.04.2006. Issue No.1 & 2 are treated as preliminary issues. Hence I
reproduce the Issue No.1 & 2 along with my findings thereon for the reasons to follow:
Sr. No.
Issues
Findings
1
Does the workman prove that the Enquiry Officer conducted the enquiry
proceedings in violation of the principles of natural justice ?
No
2.
Whether the workman proves that the findings of the Enquiry Officer given
in his report dated 14.10.2002 are perverse ?
No
Reasons
Issue No.1.
17.
It is well settled that if the service of the employee came to be terminated after proper domestic enquiry held in
accordance with the rules of natural justice and the conclusions reached at the enquiry are not perverse, the Industrial
Tribunal is not entitled to consider the propriety or correctness of the said conclusion. But at the same time mere form of
the enquiry would not satisfy the requirements of industrial law and would protect the disciplinary action taken by the
employer from challenge. The enquiry cannot be said to have been properly held unless,
(a)
employee proceeded against has been informed clearly of the charges leveled against him.
(b)
witnesses are examined ordinarily in presence of the employee in respect of charges.
(c)
employee is given a fair opportunity to cross examine the witnesses.
(d)
he is given fair opportunity to examine witnesses including himself in his defence.
(e)
E.O. records findings with reasons for the same in his report.
Now it is to be seen whether in the present case these requirements are complied or not ?
18.
From the evidence on record, it appears that copy of imputation of misconduct, list of documents relied upon
and the list of witnesses on the basis of which charges to be established were supplied to the concerned workman.
19.
Mr. Y. K. Goyal, Dy. G.M. [Cargo] was appointed as E.O. to conduct the enquiry. During the course of enquiry
proceedings, originals of all the management documents were shown to the workman for his perusal and verification.
Even the workman in his cross examination has admitted that his Defence Assistant demanded the inspection of original
documents and the same was given to him except document PD2C i.e. Kami Jastic Patrak. Admittedly, the workman
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6841
was given an opportunity to admit or deny each article of charges / acts of misconduct after furnishing him the facts of
the case, the charges and acts of misconduct. He participated in the enquiry. He has produced himself as a witness
before the E.O. Seven witnesses on behalf of the management were examined during the course of enquiry. After
evidence on behalf of the management workman was asked to submit the list of defence witnesses and documents in
support of his case to which he replied in negative. The workman also produced list of documents in support of his
defence. After closure of evidence both the parties submitted their briefs. The report of the E.O. was also provided to
the concerned workman on 16.12.02 and after receiving the dismissal order the workman preferred appeal on 27.12.03
which was decided by the Appellate Authority. That would show that the concerned workman was given sufficient
opportunity during the course of enquiry to defend himself.
20.
Learned Counsel for the concerned workman submitted that the enquiry was not fair & proper since it was
illegal & irregular on the part of first party to institute second enquiry on the same & similar charges which was set aside
by the Appellate Authority. As such the act on the part of disciplinary authority to issue the second charge sheet and
holding the second enquiry against the second party was illegal & irregular.
21.
In this respect, it can be said that the concerned workman has preferred appeal before the Appellate Authority
against the order of dismissal dt. 1.2.2000 based on the first enquiry and then the Appellate Authority remitted the matter
to the Airport Director ordering to hold fresh enquiry by issuing of fresh charge sheet taking into account all the relevant
documents required in the case and hence the second enquiry was conducted. Even during the course of fresh enquiry as
per the order of Appellate Authority the concerned workman was given full & fair opportunity to cross examine the
witnesses of management. So it is not the case that the concerned workman was exonerated of the charges by the
Appellate Authority. But in order to have fair & proper enquiry the Appellate Authority remitted the case to the Airport
Director ordering to hold fresh enquiry by setting aside the order of dismissal dt. 1.2.2000. It is like remanding of the
matter by the Appellate Authority for fresh enquiry. That does not mean that the Appellate Authority has exonerated the
concerned workman of the charges leveled against him. On the contrary, it appears that the concerned workman was put
under suspension during the course of fresh enquiry that was ordered by the Appellate Authority. As such the Appellate
Authority has power to direct the fresh enquiry by remitting the matter to the Disciplinary authority and therefore it was
not illegal on the part of first party to hold fresh enquiry by issuing the fresh charge sheet as per the order of Appellate
Authority.
22.
That apart even the fresh enquiry which was held as per order of Appellate Authority was not on same & similar
charges of the first party. The second charge sheet dt. 7.8.2001 Ex. M-1 & M-29 was issued with additional charges by
adding two charges namely.
I)
committing fraud and dishonesty in connection with the property of AAI and causing damage to the
said property and
II)
refusing to surrender PIC No. N16256M in the department thereby willfully disobeying the lawful and
reasonable orders of superiors and breach of security.
23.
It cannot be said therefore that fresh enquiry was held as per the order of the Appellate Authority by adding two
additional charges and therefore enquiry was not fair & proper.
24.
Next contention of the second party workman is that the enquiry was not fair & proper because of non
production of original document which was exhibited by the E.O. as Ex. 2C dt. 12.2.02 [Ex. M-10 on pg. 67) and E.O.
relied upon the said document though it was not duly proved. In this respect as said earlier the concerned workman in his
evidence has admitted that inspection of original documents was given to him except document 2 C [M-10 at pg. 67].
This document PD2C [Ex. M-10] is the Xerox copy of Kami Jastic Patrak. This is infact a public document and certified
copy of the public document can be admitted in evidence. On going through the enquiry report, it appears that the E.O.
has considered Kami Jastic Patrak which shows that the land CTS No. 272 Survey No. 104 is meant for Aerodrum. It
has been observed by him that the said document PD2C i.e. Kami Jastic Patrak has been challenged as a forged document
by the delinquent but the concerned workman that is delinquent did not produce the Kami Jastic Patrak to substantiate
this particular document as forged document. He considered that the certified copy from Notary of Hak Patra dt. 28.1.02
& dt. 14.11.96 as DD No. 14 & 15 indicate that the survey No. 104 has been acquired for the purpose of Madhya Sarkar
only. It appears therefore that EO did arrive at the finding that the land in question is belonging to AAI. It is not only on
the basis of the document 2C [M-10] i.e. Kami Jastic Patrak. The other documents are tendered by the management
before the E.O. Out of which the said document 2C is one of them. The inspection of original documents was given
admittedly to the concerned workman during the course of enquiry and this document Ex. 2C [M-10] being public
document was considered by the E.O. while arriving at finding. In the absence of evidence on behalf of the concerned
workman before the E.O., the E.O. concluded that the said document 2C cannot be considered as forged document and
placed reliance on it coupled with the other documents on record produced by the management.
25.
Even it appears that the documents produced by the concerned workman Hakka-che-patrak dt. 14.11.96 and
28.1.02 which was marked by the E.O. as Ex. DD-15 & DD-14 respectively were taken into consideration by the E.O. to
show that the land in question is belonging to the government and thereafter the E.O. considered that the land acquired by
central Govt. prior to formation of IAAI 1971 was transferred to IAAI through IAA Act 43 of 1971 and then to AAI
through AAI Act 55 of 1954. Even as per the list dt. 29.3.18, first party has produced certified copy of the Property Card
which is public document showing that the property in question is belonging to AAI. It cannot be said therefore that the
enquiry was not fair & proper since the E.O. placed reliance on Ex. M-10, the original copy of which has not been placed
on record during the course of enquiry proceedings.
6842
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
26.
In this view it is the submission of the Learned Counsel for the first party that the original document marked as
Ex. 2C by E.O. was shown to the workman and he took the inspection of same. The said document was tendered by Mr.
Arun Sharma during the course of enquiry and the same being public document, it is admissible in the evidence. The
submission holds good while considering the aspect since it has not been established during the enquiry proceedings that
the document 2C is forged document.
27.
In view of this, it can be said that the E.O. concluded after considering the evidence, oral & documentary that
the land is vested in authority by virtue of section 12 (1) (a) of the International Airport Authority Act, 1971. As such the
land Survey No.104 under CTS No. 272 belongs to AAI.
28.
Learned Counsel for the second party submits that the E.O. during the course of enquiry did not question the
second party on the circumstances if any appearing against him in evidence for the purpose of enabling him to explain
any circumstances appearing against him in the evidence as it was mandatory as per the Regulation 28 by International
Airport Authority of India Employees [Conduct, Discipline & Appeal], Regulations, 1987. Therefore the enquiry is not
fair & proper. he seeks to rely on the decision in case of Ministry of Finance V/S. S.B. Ramesh – 1988 CLR 659 to
submit that where the E.O. failed to question the charge sheeted employee under sub rule 18 of Rule 14 of CCS [CCA]
Rules, the omission to do this is a serious error committed by the enquiry authority and it vitiates the entire enquiry
proceedings.
29.
However, on going through the enquiry proceedings, it appears that the second party has filed written brief
explaining the circumstances appearing against him in the evidence. It cannot be said therefore that the opportunity was
not given by the E.O. to the concerned workman to explain the circumstances appearing against him in the evidence.
Even it cannot be said that the E.O. has not considered points raised by the second party in his written brief. What is
necessary is that the delinquent should have been given sufficient opportunity to defend himself so that no prejudice
would be caused to him. If there is no evidence to show that any such prejudice is caused to the concerned workman
while conducting the enquiry then the conclusion is that the enquiry is fair & proper and as such there is no violation of
principles of natural justice.
30.
As a matter of fact, it appears that there were eight charges leveled against the concerned workman. As per
charge No.1, the concerned workman committed encroachment on AAI land and was running garage on the said
encroached land of AAI in the name of his wife. In respect of this charge, oral evidence of Hiramath who conducted the
survey of land is considered by the E.O. along with documents namely P.R. Card PD3 of Village Kondivita bearing CTS
No. 277. Hakkache Patrak PD-2(B) in respect of survey No.104 of Village Kondivita. Kami Jastic Patrak PD2C
pertaining to CTS No. 272 corresponding Survey No. 104 and the notification document PD-4, Hakka Patra PD29 (B),
PR Card PD-3. These documents were considered by the EO to come to the conclusion that disputed land belongs to
AAI since survey No. 104 comes under CTS 272 and it belongs to Aerodrum as per KJP & PD4.
31.
In this respect submission is that there is no documentary evidence to show that there is encroachment by
running garage in the name of wife of concerned workman. The concerned workman in his evidence has no doubt
denied the allegations that he is running motor garage on said encroached land of AAI. However, on going through the
enquiry report the evidence of Kartar Singh and C.K. Nair is being considered by the E.O. to come to the conclusion that
S.T. Auto Engg. Works located within the boundary land belonging to AAI and it was confirmed by Sr. Land Manager
Shri A.K. Gupta that the concerned workman V.B. Tiwari is running the garage at survey No. 35 of Marole Technical
area. Evidence of Gupta was considered by the E.O. to come to the conclusion that he visited the area with the
supervisor and found few cars parked on the road adjacent to the garage. This was the evidence before the E.O. during
the course of enquiry to come to the conclusion that as per notification gazette published dt. 2.4.53 in Bombay Govt.
Notification dt. 28.8.47, the land was acquired for the purpose of Aerodrum and owned by AAI and that there was garage
S.T. Auto Engg. Works within the boundary of land belonging to AAI which was run by the concerned workman Shri
V.B. Tiwari.
32.
It appears on going through the enquiry report that the defence of the concerned workman was that the
document Kami Jastic Patrak is a forged document and that only on the basis of written statement of his wife, the E.O.
has considered that the land belongs to AAI but that defence was not considered since there was no evidence before the
E.O. to substantiate that the Kami Jastic Patrak was forged document. It is not even the case that only on the basis of
statement of his wife in the written statement before court it was confirmed by the E.O. that land belongs to AAI. On
going through the enquiry report, it appears that he considered oral and documentary evidence and corroborating
evidence in the form of statement of wife of concerned workman that the land belongs to AAI and even the concerned
workman during the course of enquiry has not disputed in his brief that he was running the motor garage on the
encroached land. From this, it can be seen that the findings of the E.O. as regards charge No.1 is not perverse or biased.
33.
Even then, the Learned Counsel for the concerned workman submitted that the E.O. ignored to consider the
documents produced by the second party to establish that the land in question does not belong to the first party. He
points out that the extract from the property registered card pertaining to the land at city survey No. 272 [M-11] shows
that the title of the land is in favour of the Central Govt. He then points out that the document Ex. DD13 (M-36) i.e. 7/12
extract in respect of survey No. 35 of Village Marole, Ex. DD14 [Ex.M37], Hak Patrak dt. 28.1.02 in respect of land
survey No. 104 of Kondivita Village and document Ex. DD15 [Ex.38] i.e. Hakkache Patrak dt. 14.11.96 is in respect of
land survey No. 104 and all these documents show that the land in question does not belong to first party.
34.
However, on going through the enquiry report, it appears that document i.e. Property Registered card, Hakkache
Patrak, 7/12 extract pertaining to land survey No. 35 are being considered by the EO who found that the survey No. 104
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6843
has been acquired by Madhya Sarkar. But then the document Kami Jastic Patrak in respect of CTS No. 272 survey No.
104 shows that the land survey No. 104 is meant for Aerodrum. It cannot be said therefore that the documents relied
upon by the concerned workman were not considered by the E.O. during enquiry.
35.
Charge No.2 is in respect of allegations of committing fraud & dis-honesty in connection with the property of
AAI and causing damage to the said property. As per the findings of the E.O., the land belongs to AAI and then while
considering this charge, it was considered by the E.O. that the garage was situated on the property of AAI. Evidence of
Paladia PW7 was considered which is to the effect that he himself went to the disputed land and found that the garage
was situated. He contacted wife of the concerned workman who confirmed that the garage is in her name. Even on the
basis of enquiries from the neighbours, the witness confirmed that the concerned workman was running the said garage.
It can be said therefore that the findings of the E.O. as regards charge No.2 is also based on evidence.
36.
Learned Counsel for the concerned workman submitted that the Estate Officer appointed under the Premises Act
also closed the proceedings initiated against the wife of second party in the year 1998 knowing fully well that the land in
question does not belong to AAI.
37.
However, that is not the true position. On going through the copy of order of Dy. Municipal Commissioner
Zone – III on the subject of un-authorised construction of the structure having 3 rooms and open space attached to temple
abutting the road leading to KK Road to Ashok Nagar Technical area, Opp. Mukund Nagar, Marole Pipeline. It has been
observed that the suit structure is on the land belonging to the government and in turn aviation Dept., AAI Govt.
Undertaking. As per the order suit structure mentioned in the notice stands unauthorized and plaintiff Smt. Vidyapati
Tiwari i.e. wife of the concerned workman is directed to remove the same by herself within 8 weeks from the date of
receipt of order failing which Assistant Commissioner is directed to demolish the same on the risk and cost of plaintiff.
This would show that as per the order of Municipal Commissioner unauthorized structure was erected by the wife of
concerned workman on the land belonging to AAI and it was directed to be removed by her. In view of that it can be
said the findings of the E.O. as regards the charge No.2 is not perverse.
38.
As regards the charge No.3 which is in respect of indulging in outside business activity by the concerned
workman while in service of AAI, the E.O. considered the evidence of Paladia indicating that the concerned workman
was running the garage in the name of his wife, coupled with the documents PD-10 and PD-11 showing that the
concerned workman used to sign the muster and was going to his own garage for doing the private trading. As such the
findings of the E.O. to charge No.3 is also based on evidence.
39.
As regards the charge No.4 which is in respect of hiding the information regarding possession of profession of
his wife and claiming undue monetary benefits from AAI, the EO considered the evidence of Paladia and documentary
evidence PD-10, PD-11, PD-14 indicating that the concerned workman was doing private trading and that he has availed
LTC benefits for his wife and family members though as per document PD-14 it was indicated that his wife was
dependent on him.
40.
As regards the charge No.5, that is refusing to surrender PIC No. 16256, it was considered by the E.O. that as
per additional PD No. 5 dt. 3.4.01, the concerned workman was requested to surrender PIC No. 16256 but he surrendered
PIC No. 16256 only on 13.8.01 as indicated in DD-21 after the issuance of charge sheet dt. 7.8.01. As such, this finding
of the E.O. is based on document PD-1, PD-2, additional PD-3 & additional PD-4 indicating that the concerned workman
has refused to surrender the PIC though he was asked to surrender the PIC vide these documents.
41.
Charge No.6 is in respect of acting in a manner prejudicial to interest of the authority. Charge No. 7 is in
respect of acting in a manner unbecoming an employee of the authority and committing the act subversive of discipline
and good behavior. Charge No. 8 is in respect of failure to maintain absolute integrity. The EO while considering that
the Charges No.1 to 5 are proved has considered that for proving charge No. 6, 7, 8, the same reasoning holds good.
Therefore on going through enquiry report, it appears that the findings of the E.O. are not perverse as such the findings
are based on evidence.
42.
Learned Counsel for the concerned workman seeks to rely on the decision in case of Dwarkachand V/s. State of
Rajasthan – 1958 AIR Rajasthan 38 to submit that if the departmental enquiry is resulted in exoneration, second
departmental enquiry on the same facts is not maintainable.
43.
In the present case as seen earlier, it is not the case that the Appellate Authority has exonerated the concerned
workman of the charges leveled against him. However, the Appellate Authority for giving fair opportunity has remanded
the matter for fresh enquiry. As such it is the remanding of the matter by the Appellate Authority for fresh enquiry and
therefore it is not the second enquiry on the same facts. Therefore the ratio in the above cited dictum does not help the
concerned workman. It is because it may be possible in a particular case that there has been no proper enquiry because
some serious defect has crept into the enquiry or some important witnesses were not available at the time of enquiry or
were not examined for some other reason, the disciplinary authority may ask the EO to record further evidence.
Disciplinary authority has enough power to reconsider the evidence itself and come to its own conclusion. These are the
observations which I borrow from para – 12 of the cited judgment.
44.
Learned Counsel for the concerned workman also seeks to rely on the decision in case of Satara Dist. Central
Co-op. Bank Ltd., Dist. Satara V/s. Subhash Kashinath Mule – 1991 – II CLR 405 to submit that specific provisions of
the standing order has to be informed to the delinquent who has allegedly committed misconduct. If this was not done
then it can be said that he was denied reasonable opportunity of being defended. The reliance is also place on the
6844
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
decision in case of U.P. State Road Transport Corpn. V/s. Munniruddin – 1990 – II CLR 533 to submit that non-supply
of material documents causes prejudice to the employee.
45.
Here in the instant case it is not the case of the concerned workman that he has not been supplied the material
documents. On the contrary in his cross examination, concerned workman has admitted that all the original documents
except document M-10 has been shown to him. As regards the document Kami Jastic Patrak Ex. M-10 there is specific
finding by the E.O. and the document is also referred during the course of enquiry. The certified copy of the said
document is also placed on record during the course of enquiry. It cannot be said that during the course of enquiry the
concerned workman was prejudiced because of non-supply of material documents or for any other reason. As such facts
in the instant case are quite distinct & distinguishable.
46.
Considering all these facts, I find that the E.O. conducted the enquiry proceedings in view of principles of
natural justice. As such there is no violation of principles of natural justice and the findings of the E.O. are not perverse.
I answer the above issues accordingly as indicated against each of them in terms of above observations.
47.
Hence I pass the following order.
ORDER
1.
Enquiry held is fair & proper.
2.
Findings of the Enquiry Officer are not perverse.
3.
Parties are directed to argue and lead evidence on the point of quantum of punishment.
Date: 17.10.2018
M.V. DESHPANDE, Presiding Officer
नई िदल् ली, 3 िदसम् बर, 2018
का. आ. 1779-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 (a1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
;wfu;u cSad vkQ bafM;k ds izca/kr= ds lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjks ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa
dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] Hkqous’oj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 55@2013½ dks izdkf’kr djrh gS tks
dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 3-12-2018 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y--12011@57@2013-vkbZvkj ¼ch--II½]
jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 3rd December, 2018
S.O. 1779.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 55/2013 of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Bhubaneswar as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Union Bank of
India, and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 3.12.2018
[No. L-12011/57/2013 - IR(B-II)]
RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, BHUBANESWAR
Present: Shri B.C. Rath, Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-cum-Labour
Court, Bhubaneswar.
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 55/2013
Date of Passing Award – 16th October, 2018
Between:
The Dy. General Manager,
Union Bank of India, Nodal Regional Office,
Bhubaneswar (Orissa).
…1st Party-Management
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6845
(And)
The General Secretary,
All Odisha Union Bank Employees Association,
C/o. Union Bank of India,
Bhubaneswar (Orissa)
… 2nd Party-Union
Appearances:
Shri B.B. Mohapatra, Auth. Re.
…For the 1st Party- Management
Shri Ajay Kr. Mohanty, General Secretary
… For the 2nd Party- Union
AWARD
By a letter No. L-12011/57/2013 – IR(B-II), dated 07.08.2013 the Central Government in the Ministry
of Labour & Employment, in exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of
Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (herein-after referred to as “The Act”), have referred the following
dispute for adjudication and the reference runs as follows:-
“Whether the claims of the All Odisha Union Bank Employees Association that the action of the management of
Union Bank of India claiming the violation of bipartite settlement in out-sourcing the job of Bank’s currency
chest situated at Berhampur is legal and or justified? What relief the said Union is entitled to?”
The facts relevant for adjudication of the dispute are that currency chest is part of a Bank where the jobs of cash
remittances are undertaken. When cash is accumulated in a Bank branch in excess over the permissible limit, the excess
cash is remitted to the chest. It is the claim of the 2nd party-Union in its statement of claim that such job of cash
remittance is being done by Bank’s own staff by use of Bank’s own cash delivery van driven by the Bank’s
employee/Driver. On receipt of cash at the chest, Bank’s Cashier counts the same and does all other ancillary works for
onward remittance of the cash to the Reserve Bank of India. Similarly, when a branch is in need of cash, the cash is
remitted to the branch by use of Bank’s own Van accompanied by Bank’s employees as stated above. It is the case of the
2nd party that one of such currency chests of the Management-Bank is situated at Berhampur, Odisha. The work of cash
remittance was smoothly carried out in the chest by the employees of the Management as described earlier by using
Bank’s own cash Van. All of a sudden when the cash Van was out of order and brought to Bhubaneswar for repairing,
the Management Bank had unilaterally decided to out-source the entire job of currency chest despite strong opposition to
such out-sourcing by the Union. It is the claim of the Union that as per bipartite settlements between the Management
and the Union there is no scope for the Management Bank to out-source the job of cash remittance except in the matter of
I.T. and its related activities in respect of specialized area where in-house capabilities are not available. The action of the
Management in hiring the outsource agencies for such cash remittance is an unfair labour practice as much as such action
affects and brings change in service condition as enumerated in Schedule-IV of the Act. By introducing the method of
outsourcing in the job of cash remittance an environment is being created for retrenchment of employees engaged in the
said sector as well as the same will affect the promotion prospective of the employees. The said action of the
Management is a clear case of violation of bipartite settlements between the parties. According to the 2nd party a protest
was raised before the Management when such method of out-sourcing was adopted in the work of cash remittance. As
the Management did not pay any heed to the demand of the Union for discarding the service of out-sourcing agency in
the matter of cash remittance, a dispute was raised before the labour machinery. The conciliation attempt having been
failed the reference as mentioned earlier is made to this Tribunal for an adjudication of the dispute.
In its written statement the Management-Bank has resisted the claim of the 2nd party taking a stand that the
reference is not maintainable as there was/is no existing of apprehended industrial dispute between the parties in the
event of out-sourcing the job of cash remittance. It is within the managerial discretion of an employer to organize and
arrange his business in the manner he considers best. The engagement of out-sourcing agency in the work of cash
remittance in a contingency cannot be treated or termed as an “Industrial dispute” as defined in Section 2(k) of the Act.
As such, the reference is bad in law. That apart, it is the stand of the Management that no retrenchment/termination is
effected or promotions of the employees are suspended or withheld by engagement of an out-sourcing agency in the job
of cash remittance. There is also no specific terms and conditions in the various bi-partite settlements prohibiting the
Management to take assistance of out-source in such cash remittance more particularly in urgent contingencies. On the
other hand as per the guidelines issued from time to time by the Reserve Bank the Banks are to take its own decision and
view on the desirability of out-sourcing in activity related to financial services for public interest and keeping in view all
relevant factors including the commercial aspects of the decision. The decision to out-source the financial services
activity is taken keeping in view the risk and for necessary safeguards of cash remittance. There is a need of large
network to handle the currency chest and work of cash remittance to meet the cash requirements and cash remittance of
various branches of the Management-Bank and its extension counters. The existing staff and infrastructure is not found
adequate to meet such need. As such, the action of the Management cannot be held unfair or the same amounts to a
change to service condition of its employees as defined and contemplated in the Act. The alleged action being managerial
discretion of the Bank for its smooth functioning cannot be said illegal and unjustified and as such the dispute raised by
the Union should be rejected out-rightly.
On the afore-mentioned pleadings of the parties the following issues have been settled for an effective
adjudication of the dispute.
6846
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ISSUES
1. Whether the reference is maintainable?
2. Whether the claim of the All Odisha Union Bank Employees Association that the action of the management of
Union Bank of India claiming the violation of bipartite settlement in out-sourcing the job of Bank’s currency
chest situated at Berhampur is legal and justified?
3. What relief the said Union is entitled to?
The 2nd party-Union has examined one of its office bearer and filed copy of the minutes of the I.R. Meeting held
on 20.3.2012, copy of the bi-partite settlement dated 2.6.2005, copy of bipartite settlement dated 27.4.2010, copy of
bipartite settlement dated 25.5.2015, copy of the letter of the Union dated 29.6.2012 addressed to the Management, copy
of the letter dated 3.2.2014 issued by the A.G.M. Security, Mumbai to National Dy. Chairman, National Ex-Serviceman
Co-ordination Committee, Calicut and copy of advertisement for recruitment of Armed Security Guard in RBI, which are
marked as Ext.-1 to Ext.-7 to substantiate its stand, whereas the Management has also adduced oral as well as
documentary evidence marked Ext.-A and Ext.-B to refute the claim of the Union.
FINDINGS
All the issues are taken into consideration simultaneously for the sake of convenience and since they are inter-
linked to each other.
It is apparent from the pleadings and evidence of the 2nd party-Union that the action of the Management in out-
sourcing the job of Bank’s currency chest is opposed mainly on the allegation that the action violates the settlement
reached out between the parties in the bipartite settlement of the year, 2005 as well as subsequent bi-partite settlements
between the parties. According to the Union the Management is precluded by virtue of the bipartite settlement, 2005 to
engage any out-sourcing agency in the matter/job of the cash remittance to bank’s currency chest or vice-versa since
Clause 31-H of the said bipartite settlement (Ext.-2) mandates that the Bank can only out-sourced IT and its related
activities and no other area. Be that as it may, the decision of the Management in out-sourcing the work/job of currency
remittance to the currency chest or vice versa is illegal and such action of the Management being an unfair labour
practice as defined under section 9-A cannot be protected and legalized. As per the Management’s pleading and
argument the Management has discretion to run its day to day administration by adopting policies beneficial to the
Management. The Management having competency to take decision in the policy matter/day to day administration is not
necessarily to do a particular job or to get a work done in a particular manner as desired by the 2nd party-Union or its
employees. Any decision taken for betterment of the administration or for public cause cannot be termed as industrial
dispute as defined in the Act. As such the reference is not maintainable.
Taking into consideration the rival stands it is to be seen first whether the demand raised by the 2nd party is an
“industrial dispute” required to be adjudicated under section 10-A of the I.D. Act. The grievance of the 2nd party-Union is
that the action of the Management in out-sourcing the job of Bank’s currency is not only prohibited by the bipartite
settlements, but the same likely bringing changes to the service condition of the employees of the Bank is an unfair
labour practice. The decision in the matter affects the terms and conditions of employment and any change in such
service condition requires a notice as prescribed under section 9-A of the Act. It is not in dispute that the job of Bank’s
currency chest prior to the alleged out-sourcing was done by the employees of the Management-Bank. There is also no
serious dispute that the Bank has its own vehicle and driver for the said job. It is also emerging from the evidence of the
parties that the Management-Bank has sanctioned posts of armed guards for the purpose. Though, there is no specific
pleadings or evidence to the fact that out-sourcing the job of Bank currency chest would likely cause retrenchment of
armed guards or any other employees engaged in such job, it cannot be denied that any decision in the matter of out-
sourcing or engaging its own employees in the said job is a matter related to the terms of employment as well as
determination of contract of employment. As such any dispute in regard to the determination of contract or the
employment or terms of employment is an “industrial dispute” as defined under section 2(k) of the Act. Hence, the
argument advanced by the Management that the action taken by the Management and objection thereto is not an
“industrial dispute” has no force to stand. In the Banking system the work of currency chest is very vital and essential
part of the business of the Management. Any policy decision for smooth functioning of the currency chest will
undoubtedly affect the terms of service condition of the workman engaged for the said job. That being the situation the
2nd party-Union has every right to raise an industrial Dispute before the competent authority for the action of the
Management in out-sourcing the work of currency chest. In that view of the matter such dispute having been not
conciliated can be referred to for an adjudication in exercise of the powers conferred under section 10-A of the Act.
Hence, the claim of the Management that the reference is bad in law is not sustainable.
Coming to the issue whether the action of the Management-Bank in outsourcing the job of Bank’s currency
chest at Berhampur is a violation of the bi-partite settlement, 2005 (marked as Ext.-2) it is seen that the Management has
taken a stand that neither the said settlement under Ext.-2 nor the bipartite settlements prior to or subsequent to Ext.-2 has
any specific restriction for out-sourcing the job of currency chest. Besides, it has been claimed that the Bank has every
right to reorganize its business or to close or out-source a particular work or section in order to rationalize or economize
its business. There being no report of any retrenchment or surplus employees due to such out-sourcing of Bank’s
currency chest work the action of the Management cannot be counted as an unfair labour practice or such action has
violated any terms conditions of service. On the other hand, it has been argued on behalf of the 2nd party-Union that out-
sourcing being restricted in the day to day business of the Management-Bank in view of different sub-clauses enumerated
in clause – 31 of the bi-partite settlement, 2005 the action of the Management in out-sourcing Bank’s currency chest job
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6847
is totally illegal and unjustified. Admittedly on a mere reading of the various sub-clauses of clause – 31 including clause
31-H, it is emerged that the Bank may out-source IT related activities and in respect of its specialized area only where in-
house capability is not available. It is not in dispute that the bipartite settlement of 2005 and other settlements do not
specify that the Management-Bank is strictly prohibited in out-sourcing other jobs than the IT activity. Moreover, the
close reading of various sub-clauses of 31 leads to an inference that the Bank has authority or discretion to redesign,
review the existing jobs or work process or to adopt the new systems and procedures, if it is believed in bonafide that the
reorganization is necessary or the system can be rationalized and economized its business or economize its expenditure.
At the same time the sub-clauses lead to an inference that the Management is to endeavor to retain/re-skill the staff in
order to develop the in-house competencies while it may out-source IT and its related activities where in-house
capabilities are not available. In view of such specific wording and sentences in Clause 32, doubt can also be entertained
on the discretion of the Management to out-source all nature of jobs in the Bank other than the activity of IT sector.
Further, it cannot be over-sighted as well as it is emerged from the evidence of the parties that the Bank was having its
own staff for the job of currency chest. It was having its own cash delivery van and Driver and Security guards for the
job of cash remittance in the currency chest. By introducing out-sourcing in the said job it can be presumed that
employee engaged in such currency activity is likely to be declared surplus and occasion may arise for dislodging of the
employees found surplus in the said activity. Hence, the out-sourcing would bring a change in service condition of
certain section of the employees of the Bank. As per the provisions of Section 9-A the employer is prohibited to bring
changes in service condition unless it is notified earlier otherwise the action would be an unfair labour practice. It is in
evidence that no prior notice was given to the employees before adopting the system of out-sourcing in the currency
chest. Though the Management has managerial discretion to organize/reorganize and arrange/rearrange its business in the
manner he considers best so long it is bonafide. The Management has to take such action in organize/reorganize in
accordance to the provisions required by any law/special statute. Since certain restrictions seems to have been made on
the Management to borrow out-sourcing in other official business/job except in the matter of IT activities, the Bank was
required to issue notice to the employees of the Bank. Hence, such action of the Management can be termed as illegal
and unjustified solely on account of the same being not notified to the employees.
But, in the case at hand it cannot be over-looked that the Management took the assistance of the out-sourced
when its delivery van became out of order. It is in evidence that the vehicle is yet to be repaired. The remittance in
currency chest is an important part of Bank’s business or job and it needs to be attended urgently. There is no evidence
on behalf of the Union to show that the action of out-sourcing is adopted for all time. There is also no evidence to suggest
that the action of out-sourcing has dislodged or disengaged any employee of the Bank or the same action is likely make
some employees surplus or may affect their service condition. In absence of any specific evidence in the above regard the
action of the Management due to certain contingencies cannot also be declared unfair on the ground of the same not
being notified to the employees as required by the provisions of Section 9-A of the Act. The Management has taken a
specific stand that it has out-sourced the currency chest job on account of cash delivery van being out of order. No
evidence has been adduced by the 2nd party-Union to refute the said evidence. It is also well settled that it is within the
managerial discretion of an employer to organize and arrange his business in the manner he considers best and such
action is taken in bonafide, the Tribunal has no competency to question such action of the Bank (PAL & Others reported
in air 1970 SC 1334). Hence, the action of the Management in out-sourcing the job of currency chest in urgency seems to
be bonafide.
For the reasons and discussions made above in my considered view the claim of the 2nd party-Union to declare
the action of the Management-Bank in out-sourcing the job of Bank currency chest as illegal and unjustified has no leg to
stand or no legal sanctity. Besides, the dispute raised in this regard does not seem to be an industrial dispute in true sense
of labour laws as there is no evidence to the effect that the Management has adopted the system of outsourcing as a
permanent phenomena. Therefore, no relief can be given to the 2nd party-Union in the present contingency.
Reference is answered accordingly.
Dictated & Corrected by me.
B. C. RATH, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 3 fnlEcj] 2018
dk- vk- 1780-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eqEcbZ iksVZ
VªLV ds izca/kr= ds lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjks ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- 2] eqEcbZ ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 14@2017½ dks izdkf’kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 03-12-2018
dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&31012@01@2017&vkbZ vkj ¼ch&II)]
jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
6848
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
New Delhi, 3rd December, 2018
S.O. 1780.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 14/2017) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No
2, Mumbai as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Mumbai Port Trust, and their
workmen, received by the Central Government on 03.12.2018
[No. L-31012/01/2017-IR(B-II)]
RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.2, MUMBAI
PRESENT :M. V. Deshpande, Presiding Officer
REFERENCE NO.CGIT-2/14 of 2017
EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF MUMBAI PORT TRUST
The Chairman,
Mumbai Port Trust,
Port House, Shoorji Vallabhdas Marg,
Mumbai – 400 001.
AND
THEIR WORKMEN
Shri Karbhari Keru Bhangare,
A/108, Tulsivilla Building, Manda,
Titwala (W), Distt. Thane,
Thane –
APPEARANCES:
FOR THE EMPLOYER
:
Mr. Umesh Nabar Advocate
FOR THE WORKMEN
:
Absent
Mumbai, dated the 24th October, 2018
AWARD
1.
This is reference made by the Central Government in exercise of powers under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and
sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 vide Government of India, Ministry of Labour &
Employment, New Delhi vide its order No. L-31012/01/2017 – IR (B-II) dated 26.04.2017. The terms of reference given
in the schedule are as follows :
“Whether the action of the management of Mumbai Port Trust in terminating the services of Shri Karbhari Keru
Bhangare, Typist-cum-Computer Clerk w.e.f. 06.07.2012 under the pretext of long period of unauthorized
absenteeism is just & legal ? If not, what relief the workman concerned is entitled to ?“
2.
After the receipt of the reference, both the parties were served with the notices.
3.
On going through Roznama it appears that the concerned workman is absent since beginning i.e. from 4.7.17.
Statement of claim has not been filed so far want of evidence to substantiate the claim. Reference is liable to be rejected
and accordingly it is rejected.
ORDER
Reference is rejected with no order as to costs.
Date: 24.10.2018
M.V. DESHPANDE, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 3 fnlEcj] 2018
dk- vk- 1781-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eqEcbZ iksVZ
VªLV ds izca/kr= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjks ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd
vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- 2] eqEcbZ ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 96@2014½ dks izdkf’kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 03-12-2018
dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&31011@01@2014&vkbZvkj ¼ch-&II)]
jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6849
New Delhi, the 3rd December, 2018
S.O. 1781.— In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 96/2014) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No
2, Mumbai as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Mumbai Port Trust, and their
workmen, received by the Central Government on 03.12.2018.
[No. L-31011/01/2014-IR(B-II)]
RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 2, MUMBAI
PRESENT : M. V. Deshpande, Presiding Officer
REFERENCE NO.CGIT-2/ 96 of 2014
EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF MUMBAI PORT TRUST
The Chairman,
Mumbai Port Trust,
Port House, 2nd Floor, S.V. Marg,
Ballard Estate,
Mumbai – 400 001.
AND
THEIR WORKMEN
The President,
The Bombay Transport & Dock Workers’ Union,
Shroff Mansion, 157-B, R. No. 25, 4th Floor,
P. D’Mello Road, Carnac Bunder,
Mumbai.
APPEARANCES:
FOR THE EMPLOYER
:
Mr. Umesh Nabar Advocate
FOR THE WORKMEN
:
Mr. P. K. Sharma Representative
Mumbai, dated the 8th October, 2018
AWARD
1.
This is reference made by the Central Government in exercise of powers under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and
sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 vide Government of India, Ministry of Labour&
Employment, New Delhi vide its order No. L-31011/01/2014 – IR (B-II) dated 10.10.2014. The terms of reference given
in the schedule are as follows :
“Whether the action of the management of Mumbai Port Trust in denying the designation of “Ship Crane
Operators’ in Class-III to the Winch Drivers, presently categorized in Class-IV, for their operating heavy duty
hydraulic and electric cranes with the lifting capacity in the range of 50-100 tones to 200-500 tones, and for
proper pay fixation with retrospective effect at-least on par with Crane Operators of Mumbai Port Trust and
payment of arrears, is justifies and legal / what relief the workmen are entitled to ?“
2.
After the receipt of the reference, both the parties were served with the notices. They appeared through their
respective representatives.
3.
The concerned workman has filed statement of claim Ex.7 contending therein that the concerned workmen were
recruited as senior workers by Ex. BDLB. They were promoted as Winch Driver after conducting proper training and
interview. However, at the time of promotion as Winch Drivers they were not extended equal pay scale as other Winch
Drivers. They were arbitrarily continued to retain on the same scale of senior workers and payment of first ACP was also
retained by the first party even though they are entitled to equal pay and all other benefits as is being paid to Winch
Drivers of first party.
4.
It is also the case of the concerned workmen that in 1991 – 1992 due to advent of mechanism and technological
upgradation, all winches unable to lift more than 10 tone weight were replaced by heavy lift jumbo derricks, gantry,
jeminee, heavy and higher lifting capacity hydraulic & electric Ship’s crane whose minimum lifting capacity is in range
of 50 – 100 tones to 200 – 800 tones. The parcel packaging of the steel coils were also increased from 5 – 10 tones to
minimum start of 20 tones. All these upgradations caused the cranes to be very fast moving and hence became very risky
and posed a great risk to the operators while performing operations.
6850
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
5.
According to the concerned workmen the first party forced to workmen to operate the same from the date of
upgradation of technology without giving them proper benefits and equal pay scale grade and other benefits. The
concerned workmen addressed letters raising their protest and requested the first party to resolve their grievances. The
second party union on behalf of the workmen raised the demand on the management of first party by their letter dt.
28.11.13. The first party got the matter seized under conciliation before ALC on 5.12.13. However, on 5.2.14
Conciliation Officer advised the management of first party to hold bilateral talks with the second party union. However,
the first party failed to extend the proper benefits and acted in a wholly arbitrary and illegally manner. Conciliation thus
failed. Hence this reference.
6.
It is then contention of the second party union that the action of the management of MbPT in failing to designate
the concerned workmen as Ship Crane Operator and giving them proper grade from Class IV to Class III from the day of
their operating heavy lift jumbo derricks, gantry, jeminee, heavy and higher lifting capacity hydraulic & electric Ship’s
crane whose minimum lifting capacity is in range of 50 – 100 tones to 200 – 800 tones be declared illegal and the
management be directed to designate the concerned workmen as Ship Crane Operators and give them grade from Class
IV to Class III with immediate effect and then direct the management to fix them under the proper pay scale of lower
Crane Operator of MbPT who are operating maximum 16 – 20 tones crane and then direct the management to pay unpaid
arrears of difference of wages and other benefits of that scale from the date of their promotion as Winch Driver till actual
fixation and payment of proper pay scale.
7.
The first party management resisted claim by filing written statement Ex.9. It is contended that the 2nd party
union is seeking financial upgradation of the concerned employees by creating right in favour of employees by
promoting them from Class IV to Class III under the guise of claiming their upgradation to the higher post on the ground
that they are performing the similar and same duties of employees employed in Class III. However, their pleadings and
order of reference would reveal that it is not the case of union that the employees concerned are deprived of any right to
the upgradation from Class IV to Class III.
8.
It is then contented by the first party that the nature of duties of Winch Drivers employed in Class IV and of
Shower Crane Operators are different. Both the posts are in different streams and in different categories. The operations
of Wharf Crane requires higher degree of skill compared to Winch crane since Wharf Cranes are shore post and move on
the rails. If safety methods are not followed and if there is carelessness on the part of operator of wharf crane, it may
lead to toppling the crane. This is not the case as regards Winch cranes as they are relatively more stable being the
integral part of huge mass of ship. While lifting the cargo from the hatch of the ship by winch crane, there is relative
movement of winch crane and the ship. This is not the case when cargo is handled by wharf crane as there is no relative
movement between wharf crane and ship on account of which more precision and skill is required while operating the
wharf crane for loading the cargo from wharf into the ship and unloading it from the ship to wharf. The operation of the
wharf cranes demands that all the 3 operations namely hoisting / lowering of hook, luffing and slewing to be done in
synchronized manner which is not in case of winch cranes. Winch drivers are supposed to operate ship winch / jumbo
derricks, jeminee which are types of ship winch prepared to handle heavy lift cargo. Due to change in configuration of
ships now a days most of the ships are equipped with ship crane. Winch drivers are operating ship winch crane and such
lifting devices i.e. ship crane, jumbo derrick, jeminee, gantry etc. are fixed on the board vessel.
9.
It is contented by the first party that the issues as regards designation & upgradation of pay scales of category of
winch drivers on board level was thoroughly examined by one man committee for classification and categorization of
employees and workers of major port trust and Dock labour board appointed by Indian Ports Association. The said
committee after taking into consideration all the factors gave recommendation at paragraph 20.25 on the issue of winch
drivers. Now it is decided to refer the issue for arbitration and therefore the issue is pending before arbitration.
10.
It is also contented by the first party management that the advent of mechanism has reduced the human skill
element and operations can be carried out more precisely and safely due to technical upgradation on the ship cranes.
Many ships come to the port with cranes of capacity less than 50 tones which are operated by winch drivers. There are
many cargo including bagged cargo which are now handled in port of having weight less than 5 tones and therefore the
benefits sought by the 2nd party union if granted would amount to showing favour to one set of employee without giving
opportunity of being heard in the matter of other set of employees whose services would be adversely affected. It is thus
denied by the first party that the winch drivers are operating under fear and pressure and that they are subjected to
various harassment tactics. It is thus contended that the second party union is not entitled to any relief. The first party
has thus sough dismissal of the reference.
11.
The second party union by filing rejoinder Ex.13 reiterated that the cargo is admittedly either loaded or
unloaded by the winch drivers are the ship crane operators. Winch drivers do loading & unloading and cranes which are
among land static and stationery are do not move. Ship on the other hand is never stationery and always moves
depending on waves and ripples on the water and loading & unloading from the same is more difficult and possess more
danger to the workers operating as ship crane operators.
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6851
12.
Following issues are framed at Ex.18. I reproduce the issues along with my findings thereon for the reasons to
follow:
Sr. No.
Issues
Findings
1
Whether the 2nd party proves that the Winch Drivers are working as Ship
Crane Operator since 1991 - 1992 ?
No
2.
Whether the 2nd party proves that the Winch Drivers operate cranes of higher
capacity than the Shore Crane Operators of Mb.P.T. ?
No
3.
Whether the 2nd party/Union proves that the nature of duties of Winch
Drivers in class-IV categories are same on that of Crane Operators in Class
III categories are same to claim same pay-scale with retrospective effect ?
No
4.
Whether the 2nd party proves that the Winch Drivers are entitled to higher
pay scale, grade and designation higher than or at-least on par with Shore
Crane Operators with retrospective effect from 1991 – 1992 ?
No
5.
Whether the action of First Party denying the same pay-scale to Winch
Drivers in Class-IV category as that of Crane Operators in Cass-III category
is legal, fair and proper ?
Yes
6.
What order ?
As per final order
Reasons
Issue No. 1, 2 & 3.
13.
The main issue raised by 2nd party union in the above reference is that the nature of duties of Winch drivers
employed in class –IV and Shore Crane Operators are the same and that they should be paid scales and proper pay
fixation with retrospective effect and be designated as Ship Crane operators. However, the 2nd party union in its
statement of claim has not specifically stated about the nature of duties of Winch drivers vis-à-vis the nature of duties of
Shore Crane Operators.
14.
So far evidence of the President of the union is concerned vide Ex.23, he appears to have stated that the
concerned workmen were designated as senior workers and thereafter they were promoted as Winch drivers after
conducting training & interview. What is stated by him is that the workers who were recruited and promoted as Winch
drivers since 1991 – 1992 were denied equal pay scale as applicable to the category of Winch drivers. In short it is the
case of the concerned workmen that the work of Winch drivers in class –IV and Shore Crane Operators in class – III is
same meaning thereby they are claiming promotion as Shore Crane Operator.
15.
For, it is explicit from the evidence of the President of the union that the concerned workmen are claiming the
pay scale on par with Ship Crane Operators who are in class – III claiming thereby that winch drivers are doing the work
as Ship Crane Operators and that they are not of different categories.
16.
However, in his cross examination, he admitted that the weight of the cargo is increased by technical
advancement of the machinery. Admittedly winches are converted by technical upgradation. It is admitted that same
winch drivers operate advanced machinery which is replaced by earlier winches. If that is so, then it can be said that by
technical advancement of the machinery, risk to the operation is reduced while performing operations.
17.
From the evidence of Ainul Haque S/o. Salim Khan, Mohd. Anwar & Naresh Lavande, it is clear that they are
claiming promotion as Shore Crane Operator. In their cross-examination, they have admitted that they have not operated
as Shore Crane Operators. They are working as Winch drivers. Winch driver is in Class – IV categories, Shore Crane
Operator is in Class – III category. So the categories are different. Admittedly they are operating in category from Shore
Crane Operator. It appears therefore that the concerned workers are claiming promotion as Shore Crane Operator only
on the basis that the work of Winch driver is at par with Shore Crane Operator.
18.
In this respect if we see the evidence of first party witness, Shri Shashi Kumar Nikam, Asst. Administrative
Officer, it is clear from his evidence that the operations of ship crane requires higher degree of skill compared to winch
crane, for the following reasons.
(i)
Wharf Cranes (Ship Cranes) are shore based and move on the rails. If safety methods are not followed
and if there is carelessness on the part of the operator of a Wharf Crane it may lead to the toppling of
the Crane. This is not the case as regards Winch Cranes, as they relatively more stable being an
integral part of the huge mass of the Ship.
(ii)
While lifting the cargo from the hatch of the Ship by a Winch Crane, there is relative movement of
Winch Crane and the Ship. However, this not the case when Cargo is handled by the Wharf Crane, as
there is no relative movement between the Wharf Crane and the Ship on account of which more
6852
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
precision and skill is required when operating the Wharf Crane for loading the Cargo from the Wharf
into the Ship and unloading it from the Ship to the Wharf.
(iii)
Operation of Wharf Cranes demands that all the three operations viz. hoisting/lowering of hook, luffing
and slewing to be done in synchronized manner which is not the case in respect of Wharf Cranes.
19.
Apart from this, winch drivers are supposed to operate ship winch, jumbo, derricks, jeminee which are types of
ship winches prepared to handle heavy lift cargo. Winch drivers are operating ship, winch & lifting devices such as ship
crane, jumbo, derricks, jeminee, gantry etc. which are fixed on board of vessel. So considering the nature of work of the
winch drivers and ship crane drivers, it can be said that their duties are different, they are working in different categories.
As such there is no evidence to prove that the nature of work of Ship Crane Operators/Winch drivers and Shore Crane
Operators is same. At the most it can be said that the nature of work of both the categories of cranes are same.
20.
That part, if the demand of the concerned workmen is being taking into consideration, then it is submitted that it
is the prerogative of Indian Ports Association to deal with these issues of all the ports in the country in respect of fixing,
classification including wage scales and other service conditions. It is explicit from the document at Ex.43 which says
about the prerogative of Indian Ports Association. Latter at page 9 & 10 on Ex. 43 establishes that such resolution of the
issue has to be with concurrence the Federation of the employees of all ports. In any case that issue is to be resolved by
approval of Indian Ports Association.
21.
Even then the Learned Counsel for the union submitted that work done by the concerned workers and crane
operators is similar. Submission is to the effect that Shore Crane Operators working in the Wharf were not Shore Crane
Operators and Shore Crane Operators never runs on tracks during actual operations. By referring to the evidence of
Mr. Nikam, submission is made that the winch drivers were high skilled and performing the work of loading from wheels
to wharf and from wharf to wheels and could do the work of Wharf Crane Operators. In this view the submission is that
the work of concerned workers involved more skill and called for greater precision and accuracy apart from more
dangerous and therefore it is necessary to extend them benefits of equal pay for equal wages.
22.
It is not possible to countenance the view propounded by Learned Counsel for the concerned workmen. As
seen earlier, it is the prerogative of Indian Ports Association to deal with such issues of all the ports in the country.
Merely saying that the work of the concerned workmen is risky and hazardous does not give right to them to claim
promotion and financial upgradation without establishing any right vested in them under the existing system. In view of
this the submission is also to the effect that the second party union raised issues of re-designation and upgradation of pay
scales of category of winch drivers of on board labour. It was thoroughly examined by one man committee for
classification and categorization of employees and workers of major port trust and Dock labour board by Afzalpurkar
committee appointed by Indian Ports Association. The said committee after taking into consideration all the factors gave
recommendations at paragraph 20.25 on the issue of winch drivers. 5 Federations of employees have already raised the
issue of implementation of Afzalpurkar committee report with CLC in which at paragraph 20.25 of the said report the
issue of winch drivers is covered and it is decided to refer the issue for arbitration. When the issue is pending before
arbitration, the issue of winch drivers at MbPT in isolation cannot be considered.
23.
Considering all these facts, I find that the second party union has failed to establish that the nature of duties of
winch drivers of class – IV categories are same on that of crane operators in class –III categories and as such they are
operating cranes of higher capacity than the Shore Crane Operators of MbPT. The witnesses examine on behalf of the
unit admit in their cross examination that they never worked as Shore Crane Operators but then they are claiming
promotion as Shore Crane Operators in class – III categories from class – IV categories. Obviously they are not entitled
to claim designation and pay scale at par with Shore Crane Operators. The above issues are therefore answered
accordingly as indicated against each of them in terms of above observations.
Issue No.4, 5 & 6.
24.
In view of my findings to the above issues, I find that the concerned workmen are not entitled to higher pay
scales, grade, re-designation with retrospective effect from 1991 – 1992 and as such the action of the first party in
denying the same to them is legal & proper.
25.
Hence I proceed to pass the following order.
ORDER
Reference is rejected with no order as to costs.
Date: 08.10.2018
M.V. DESHPANDE, Presiding Officer
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6853
ubZ fnYyh] 3 fnlEcj] 2018
dk- vk- 1782-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
bafM;u cSad ds izca/kr= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] Hkqous’oj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 81@2012½ dks izdkf’kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks
03-12-2018 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&12011@1@2012&vkbZvkj ¼ch&II)]
jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 3rd December, 2018
S.O. 1782.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 81/2012) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Bhubaneswar as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Indian Bank, and
their workmen, received by the Central Government on 03.12.2018.
[No. L-12011/1/2012-IR(B-II)]
RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT BHUBANESWAR
Present: Shri B.C. Rath, Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-cum-Labour
Court, Bhubaneswar.
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 81/2012
Date of Passing Award – 24th October, 2018
Between:
The Zonal Manager,
Indian Bank, B-2 East, Sahidnagar,
Bhubaneswar (Orissa) – 751 007.
…1st Party-Management
(And)
The General Secretary,
Indian Bank Employees Union,
Plot No. 32, Ashok Nagar,
Bhubaneswar (Orissa) – 751 009.
…2nd Party-Union
Appearances:
Ms. Subhadra Sahoo, Asst. Manager
…
For the 1st Party- Management
Shri Ashok Kumar Mohanty, General Secretary
…
For the 2nd Party-Union.
AWARD
The Government of India in the Ministry of Labour vide its letter No. L-12011/1/2012 (IR(B-II),
dated 30.08.2012 have referred the following dispute for adjudication in exercise of its power conferred by clause (d) of
sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act (herein-after referred to as “The Act”)
“Whether the action of the management of Indian Bank, Zonal Office, Bhubaneswar in not considering the case
of regularization of 8 numbers of canteen employees (S/Shri Akhya Sahu, Dibakar Padhi, Dilip Kumar Patra,
Parikhit Nanda, Gauranga Chandra Nath, Prabhat Kumar Barik, Bijoy Kumar Dash and Niranjan Behera) who
are engaged by the Bank through Indian Bank Staff Canteen committee for decades together in Bhubaneswar, is
appropriate and justified? What relief the concerned workmen are entitled to?”
2.
The 2nd party-Union filed its statement of claim taking a stand that the eight canteen boys have been working in
the canteens in the different branches of the Management-Bank for more than fifteen years continuously, when the
reference was made. Their nature of job was perennial since the canteen is a part and parcel of the Bank. The branches of
the Bank, where the canteen boys were working, were previously under the supervision of Calcutta zone. After opening
of a zonal office of the Management-Bank the branches at Odisha have come under the control of the zonal office at
Bhubaneswar. According to the Union a dispute was raised for regularization of services of the canteen boys working in
different branches while the zonal office was at Calcutta. Consequently, a dispute relating to regularization of 41 canteen
boys was referred to the Central Government Industrial Tribunal, Calcutta. While the said dispute was pending for
adjudication before the Tribunal of Calcutta, a bipartite settlement was made between the parties for regularization of
91 canteen boys working in different branches of the Bank. The names of the canteen boys in the present dispute were
also included in that settlement. Pursuant to such settlement the Tribunal of Calcutta passed an award directing
regularization of services of all 91 canteen boys. But, the Management preferred a writ before the Hon’ble High Court of
Calcutta challenging the award. Since the original reference was related to 41 canteen boys working in different
6854
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
branches of the Bank at Calcutta, the Hon’ble High Court set aside the award given in favour of 91 canteen boys and
modified the same by holding as follows:-
“With regard to 91 canteen boys, we are of the view that the Tribunal lacked inherent jurisdiction to consider all
those 91 persons since the reference was related to 41 persons only and not 91 persons named in the list attached to the
award. The award, therefore, would be applicable in case of original 41 persons whose names are appearing in the order
of reference. For the other 50 persons the Union would be entitled to raise similar dispute and such issue can be resolved
through reconciliation on the same terms and conditions so that those 50 persons could also be brought within the
hotchpots of this settlement to avoid further complication.
The Management preferred a S.L.P. against the order of the Hon’ble High Court. But, the same was dismissed. It is the
stand of the 2nd party-Union that a fresh dispute was raised before the labour machinery at Bhubaneswar for
regularization of eight canteen boys keeping in view the observations made by the Hon’ble High Court of Calcutta. In
view of regularization of service of 41 canteen boys employed in the canteens of the branches of the Bank at Calcutta the
Management-Bank is also required to be regularized the services of the eight canteen boys engaged in different branches
of the Bank at Odisha.
3.
On the other hand, the Management-Bank has resisted the claim of the Union on a pleading that no canteen has
been established or run by the Bank in any of the branches of Odisha. Hence, there was no scope for employing or
engaging the disputant canteen boys by the Management. Therefore there being no relationship of “employer and
employee” between the Bank and the canteen boys the dispute as much as the reference is not maintainable in the eye of
law. It has also challenged the merit of the claim on a contention that the canteen boys were neither employed nor
engaged by the Bank nor their wages was paid by the branches of the Bank. The Bank-Management has its own
recruitment rules and procedures for appointment of sub-staff cadres. As such the Bank had no role in the appointment of
canteen boys working in different branches. So far the award of CGIT, Calcutta and the settlements filed thereon are
concerned, it is the stand of the Management that in no point of time the Management-Bank had agreed to regularize the
services of 41/91 canteen boys unconditionally. The settlement was subject to condition and it was subject to the
approval of the Central Government. It is also the specific stand of the Management-Bank that the reference made to the
Tribunal of Calcutta as well as the award passed therein has no bearing with the present dispute and as such, this Tribunal
is not bound by the award given by the Tribunal of Calcutta. The present dispute has to be adjudicated on the basis of the
pleadings and evidence advanced in the present reference.
4.
On the aforesaid pleadings of the parties the following issues have been settled for proper adjudication of the
dispute.
ISSUES
1. Whether the action of the management of Indian Bank, Zonal Office, Bhubaneswar in not considering the case
of regularization of 8 numbers of canteen employ8ees (S/Shri Akshya Sahu, Dibakar Padhi, Dilip Kumar Patra,
Parikhit Nanda, Gauranga Chandra Nath, Prabhat Kumar Barik, Bijoy Kumar Dash and Niranjan Behera) who
are engaged by the Bank through Indian Bank Staff Canteen Committee for decades together in Bhubaneswar, is
appropriate and justified?
2. What relief the concerned workmen are entitled to?
5.
The parties have led oral as well documentary evidence in support of their respective claim. The 2nd Party-Union
has examined its Vice President and filed documents like copy of the award of CGIT, Kolkatta in I.D. case No. 47/1992,
copy of terms of the settlement along with list of 91 employees covered in the award of CGIT, Kolkatta, copy of the
orders of the Hon’ble Kokkatta High Court in W.P.(C) No. 2101/1999, copy of the order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court
dated 8.5.2009, copy of the letter dated 17.7.1995 issued by the Zonal Manager to the Regional Manager, copy of the
letter dated 7.8.1995 issued by the Regional Manager, copy of the letter dated 7.8.1995 of the Regional Manager issued
to Krushna Prasad to put-forth their claim, whereas the Management has examined its Branch Manager and exhibited
copy of the Management’s manual (staff welfare & concession in charges) to refute the claim.
FINDINGS
6.
For the sake of convenience all the issues are taken for consideration simultaneously.
It is apparent from the pleadings and evidence as well as argument of the 2nd party-Union that its claim is solely
based on the award given by the Tribunal of Calcutta and observation made by the Hon’ble High Court of Calcutta while
setting aside the award in favour of 50 canteen boys whose claim was not referred in the original reference made by the
Tribunal of Calcutta. According to the Union the Management having agreed and entered into a settlement for
regularization of 91 canteen boys it cannot back-out from the earlier settlement and take a different stand in the present
dispute. When it has recognized the claim of all canteen boys and entered into a settlement, its stand that no canteen is
being run by the management in the branches at Odisha is not acceptable. Admittedly, there is no serious dispute to the
claim of the Union that an award was given earlier by the CGIT, Calcutta for regularization of services of 91 canteen
boys in view of the settlement made between the parties. The present canteen boys were also named in the said award for
the purpose of regularization of their service. But, the award having been set aside by the Hon’ble High Court of Calcutta
on a contention that the original dispute was related to regularization of 41 canteen boys and the industrial adjudicator
has to go by the terms of the reference, the award has no bearing in the present reference. On a close reading of the said
award, the conciliation report filed before the said Tribunal and the order of the Hon’ble High Court of Calcutta which
are marked as Ext.-1 to Ext.-3, it is found that the Management-Bank had agreed for empanelment of canteen boys as its
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6855
sub-staff subject to approval by the Central Government. There is no evidence to establish that the Central Government
had already given approval for regularization of the original 41 canteen boys. Thus, the settlement was apparently a
conditioned one and as such it has no binding force on the Management in the present dispute. That apart, the settlement
between the parties, which is marked as Ext.-2, does not reveal that the Management-Bank had ever conceded that the
canteens, where the boys were working, belonged to him or those canteens were recognized by it. It was not also
conceded by the Bank in the said settlement that the canteen boys were engaged on its instance or they were working
under the control and supervision of the respective branches or it was paying wages to the canteen boys. In that view of
the matter the Management-Bank cannot be held to have taken any contradictory stand. On the other hand the order of
the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court reveals that the Hon’ble Court set aside the award so far canteen boys not named in the
original reference are concerned making an observation that for other 50 persons the Union would be entitled to raise a
similar dispute and such dispute can be resolved through reconciliation on the same terms and conditions so that those
50 persons can also be brought with the hot spot of the settlement to avoid further complication. Be that as it may, the
Management has no legal obligation to go for a reconciliation in the present dispute on the same terms and conditions as
made in its earlier settlement with the Union. No-where it has been estopped to take a different view than the earlier one.
That apart, the earlier settlement was subject to approval of the Central Government. No evidence has been adduced by
the 2nd Party-Union to show that the settlement made before the Calcutta Tribunal was approved by the Central
Government. In the above backdrops the pleadings and arguments advanced by the 2nd Party-Union has no force. The
present dispute has to be adjudicated on its own merit keeping in view the pleadings and evidence advanced before the
Tribunal.
Coming to the next issue on the merit of the dispute raised by the 2nd party-Union it is seen that the Management
has challenged the maintainability of the reference on a plea that the canteen boys are not its employees. Whereas, the
Union claims for regularization on a plea that the boys having worked for continuously a long period in the canteens of
the Management-Bank are to be regularized in the services of the Bank. The canteen are managed by a committee formed
by the Bank itself and the canteen having been run in the premises of the Bank, the boys working therein are to be
counted as workmen of the Bank. Before coming to the above pleadings of the parties it is profitable to mention here that
as per the principles set out by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case between Indian Overseas Bank Staff –versus- Indian
Overseas Bank & Anr. Reported in (1999) IIILLJ 621 Mad that the canteens run in the establishment of the employer are
to be classified into three categories; (i) statutory canteen which are required to be provided with subsidy in view of
Section 46 of the Factories Act, (ii) non-statutory recognized canteens which are established with the prior approval and
recognition of the employer and (iii) non-statutory/non-recognized canteen which are established without prior approval
or recognition of the employer. As per the settled principles of the Apex Court the employees in the statutory canteen are
the workmen/employees of the employer. In the case at hand no evidence has been adduced by the 2nd party-Union to
show that the canteens, where the boys are stated to have been working are statutory canteen or a non-statutory
recognized canteen. It is not also established that those canteens are established with the prior approval and recognition
of the Management-Bank. There is also no evidence to suggest that the Management had any role in establishing or
running those canteens. On the other hand, it is admitted by the witness of the 2nd party-Union that the Management-
Bank is in obligation to maintain a canteen in the branches wherever the number of employees is more than 30. No
evidence has been adduced that any branches of the Management-Bank has more than 30 numbers of employees. No
document or any paper is filed on behalf of the Union to support its claim that the canteen is a part and parcel of the
Management-Bank. On the other hand, the witness of the Management-Bank and the circular of the Management-Bank
(Ext.-A) support the stand of the Management-Bank that the Bank has an obligation only to provide space, furnitures,
fixtures and utensils free of cost for the canteen and in addition the canteen subsidy payable as per the guidelines
wherever the number of employees working in the Bank premises exceeds 75. As per the said circular canteen subsidy is
extended to all the staff members at the rate of Rs. 6/- per employee per working day towards cost of the item served to
the employee in the canteen. The subsidy is available to the subsidy administration committee of the branch. There is no
word in the said circular/guidelines about the obligation of the Management to run a canteen for its staff. That being the
position, burden lies heavily on the Union to establish that the canteens, where the boys are stated to have been working,
belonged to the Management and the disputant boys were working under the control and supervision and paying role of
the Bank. Admittedly, no oral or documentary evidence has been adduced in this regard to claim that the canteens are
either established or run by the Management-Bank and the disputants are working under the pay role of the Bank or their
work is supervised and controlled by the Management in any manner. When the employer and employee relationship has
not been established between the disputant canteen boys and the Management, a doubt can be entertained on the merit of
the dispute raised by the Union as well as maintainability of the reference. There is also no evidence before the Tribunal
as to how those eight canteen boys were employer/engaged and if the Management-Bank had any role in engaging them
to work as canteen boys or the Management was bearing their monthly wages. In absence of pleadings and evidence in
the above aspect, the demand of the Union towards regularization of services of canteen boys is not enforceable under the
provisions of the I.D. Act. Hence, the action of the Management in not regularizing the services of the canteen boys
cannot be hold illegal and unjustified.
For the reasons mentioned and discussed above the statement of claim preferred by the Union is rejected.
The reference is answered accordingly.
Dictated & Corrected by me.
B. C. RATH, Presiding Officer
6856
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ubZ fnYyh] 5 fnlEcj] 2018
dk-vk- 1783-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
Hkkjrh; LVsV cSad izca/k rarz ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh;
ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k Hkqous’oj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 59@2017½ dks izdkf’kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks
05@12@2018 izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&12012@115@2016&vkbZvkj ¼ch&1½]
Ckh- ,l- fc"V] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 5th December, 2018
S.O. 1783.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 59/2017) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court
Bhubaneswar as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of India and
their workmen, received by the Central Government on 05.12.2018.
[No. L-12012/115/2016-IR (B-1)]
B. S. BISHT, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT BHUBANESWAR
Present: Shri B.C. Rath, Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-cum-Labour
Court, Bhubaneswar.
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 59/2017
L-12012/115/2016 – IR(B-I), dated 13.09.2017
Date of Passing Order – 10th October, 2018
Between:
The Branch Manager,
State Bank of India,
At./Po. Birasal, Via-Badasuanlo,
Ps. Kankadahada, Dist. Dhenkanal.
…1st Party-Management.
(And)
Shri Debakanta Das,
S/o. Benudhar Das,
At./Po. Birasal, Via. Badasuanlo,
Dist. Dhenkanal, Odisha.
…2nd Party-Disputant.
Appearances:
Shri B.K. Mishra, Auth. Rep.
…
For the 1st Party- Management
None
…
For the 2nd Party- Disputant
ORDER
Authorized representative of the Management is present, whereas none appears on behalf of the
2nd party-Union on repeated calls. It is submitted by the authorized representative of the Management that the Union is
not taking any step in the proceeding for the last several adjournments and probably the Union has no interest to
prosecute the dispute. Perused the record. It is seen that after filing of the statements by the parties the 2nd party-Union is
not taking any steps for which the proceeding is adjourned without adjudication of the dispute. The reference case cannot
be protracted in such a manner for an indefinite period by giving mechanical adjournments awaiting the appearance of
the 2nd party-Union at its sweet will. As the 2nd party-Union fails to adduce any evidence and he has defaulted in
appearance, there is nothing before the Tribunal to adjudicate the dispute, which has been referred to.
2.
It is pertinent to mention here that until adjudication of the dispute referred to by the authority concerned, an
award cannot be made within the meaning of the award as defined under section 2(b) of the Act. There is also no
provision in the Act to pass a no-dispute award or a nil award in case the disputant fails to make appearance and
prosecute its claim. In that view of the matter passing of a no-dispute award or nil award for absence of the
disputant/parties would be a misconception and the above position has been settled by the Hon’ble High Court of Orissa
in the case between M/s. IDL Chemicals Limited –versus- P.O. Labour Court, Sambalpur reported in 72(1991)CLT 73
and in the decision of the Calcutta High Court in the case of B.R. Bermen and Mohatta (India) Pvt. Ltd., -versus-
Seventh Industrial Tribunal, West Bengal and others (short noted in 1977 Lab. I.C. (NOC) 13 (CAL). It has been also
held by the Hon’ble Courts that so long as the dispute remains unsettled and the proceeding came to an end without
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6857
adjudication of the dispute between the parties, there is no bar under the Act whereby the Government is precluded from
referring the dispute over again so that there may be an industrial adjudication as contemplated by the Act.
3.
Having regard to the above facts and circumstances as well as settled principles I am constrained to dismiss the
case registered on the reference of the dispute without any award and accordingly the reference is disposed of. A copy of
this order be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour for necessary action at their end.
Dictated & Corrected by me.
B. C. RATH, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 6 fnlEcj] 2018
dk- vk- 1784-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj ikjknhi
iksVZ VªLV ds izca/kr= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] Hkqous’oj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 22@2018½ dks izdkf’kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 06-12-
2018 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&38011@04@2017&vkbZvkj ¼ch&II½]
jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 6th December, 2018
S. O. 1784.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government
hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 22/2018) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Bhubaneswar as shown
in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Paradip Port Trust,, and their workmen, received by the
Central Government on 06.12.2018.
[No. L-38011/04/2017-IR (B-II)]
RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT BHUBANESWAR
Present: Shri B.C. Rath, Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-cum-Labour
Court, Bhubaneswar.
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 22/2018
L-38012/04/2017 – IR(B-II), dated 09.03.2018
Date of Passing Order – 17th October, 2018
Between:
1. The Chairman,
Paradip Port Trust, Paradip, Jagatsinghpur.
2. The General Manager,
M/s. J.M. Baxi & Co., At./Po. Paradip Port,
Paradip, Dist. Jagatsinghpur, Orissa.
…1st Party-Managements
(And)
The General Secretary,
Paradip Port Workers Union,
Badapadia, Paradip Port, Jagatsinghpur.
…2nd Party-Union
Appearances:
None
…
For the 1st Party- Managements
None
…
For the 2nd Party-Union
ORDER
Parties are absent on repeated calls. It is seen from the record that the Union is not taking any step in the
proceeding for the last several adjournments and probably the Union has no interest to prosecute the dispute. It is also
seen that the 2nd party-Union has not filed any statement of claim inspite of registered noticed issued to it on 13.8.2018.
The reference case cannot be protracted in such a manner for an indefinite period by giving mechanical adjournments
awaiting the appearance of the 2nd party-Union at its sweet will. As the 2nd party-Union fails to file any statement of
claim and he has defaulted in appearance, there is nothing before the Tribunal to adjudicate the dispute, which has been
referred to.
6858
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2.
It is pertinent to mention here that until adjudication of the dispute referred to by the authority concerned, an
award cannot be made within the meaning of the award as defined under section 2(b) of the Act. There is also no
provision in the Act to pass a no-dispute award or a nil award in case the disputant fails to make appearance and
prosecute its claim. In that view of the matter passing of a no-dispute award or nil award for absence of the
disputant/parties would be a misconception and the above position has been settled by the Hon’ble High Court of Orissa
in the case between M/s. IDL Chemicals Limited –versus- P.O. Labour Court, Sambalpur reported in 72(1991)CLT 73
and in the decision of the Calcutta High Court in the case of B.R. Bermen and Mohatta (India) Pvt. Ltd., -versus-
Seventh Industrial Tribunal, West Bengal and others (short noted in 1977 Lab. I.C. (NOC) 13 (CAL). It has been also
held by the Hon’ble Courts that so long as the dispute remains unsettled and the proceeding came to an end without
adjudication of the dispute between the parties, there is no bar under the Act whereby the Government is precluded from
referring the dispute over again so that there may be an industrial adjudication as contemplated by the Act.
3.
Having regard to the above facts and circumstances as well as settled principles I am constrained to dismiss the
case registered on the reference of the dispute without any award and accordingly the reference is disposed of. A copy of
this order be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour for necessary action at their end.
Dictated & Corrected by me.
B. C. RATH, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 6 fnlEcj] 2018
dk- vk- 1785-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj iatkc
us’kuy cSad ds izca/kr= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] dksydÙkk ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 23@2012½ dks izdkf’kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 06-12-
2018 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&39025@01@2017&vkbZvkj ¼ch&II]
jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 6th December, 2018
S.O. 1785.— In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government
hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 23/2012) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Kolkata as shown in the
Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Punjab National Bank,, and their workmen, received by the
Central Government on 06.12.2018.
[No. L-39025/01/2017-IR(B-II)]
RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUN ALAT KOLKATA
Application No. CGIT-23 of 2012
(Under Section 2A of the I.D. Act, 1947)
Parties: Shri Asesh Kumar Mishra,
C/o. Shri Pinaki Sekhar Koyal,
149/3, A.C. Road (South),
Indrapasta, Khagra, Dist. Murshidabad,
Pin – 742103
…Applicant
Vs
1. The Zonal Manager,
Punjab National Bank,
West Bengal Zonal Office,
Apeejay House, 4th Floor,
Kolkata – 700016.
2. Punjab National Bank,
Circle Office at Fancy Market Complex,
G.T. Road, Burdwan – 713103.
3. Punjab National Bank,
Baharampur Branch, Khagra, Baharampur,
Dist. Murshidabad, Pin – 742103
…Opp. Parties
Present: Justice Ravindra Nath Mishra, Presiding Officer
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6859
Appearance:
On behalf of the Applicant : Mr. Ranjoy De, learned counsel.
On behalf of the Opposite Parties : Mr. Joginath Sahoo, Senior Manager (HRD)
State: West Bengal.
Industry: Banking
Dated: 28th November, 2018
AWARD
Bereft of unnecessary details, the brief facts of the case are that the Applicant, Shri Asesh Kumar Mishra who as
an employee of Punjab National Bank was posted at baharampur Branch. He was served with a chargesheet dated
22nd February, 2010 on the ground of misconduct that while working as Head Cashier at Baharampur Branch of the Bank
he made payment of Rs.8,30,000/= to a party on 10th March, 2009 without obtaining any cheque and at the end of the day
pretended shortage of Rs.8,30,000/= of cash in his custody. The reply of the Applicant was found not satisfactory,
therefore, enquiry was conducted as per provisions of bipartite settlement giving all opportunity to the Applicant to
defend his case. After completion of enquiry, report was submitted to the disciplinary authority holding charges leveled
against the Applicant proved. Before awarding punishment, the Applicant was given opportunity by the disciplinary
authority in which he regretted and cited mental stress, serious sufferings to him and family. He also undertook not to
repeat this type of mistake in future. After considering the enquiry report and explanation submitted by the Applicant, the
disciplinary authority confirmed the proposed penalty of compulsory retirement with superannuation benefits against
which appeal was preferred by the Applicant. However, the appellate authority rejected his appeal vide order dated 30th
December, 2010. Challenging the order of disciplinary authority dated 6th October, 2010 by which punishment of
compulsory retirement was imposed on the Applicant and the order of appellate authority dated 30th December, 2010
rejecting the appeal of the Applicant against punishment of compulsory retirement, this application under Section 2A of
the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 has been filed by the Applicant.
2.
The Applicant has challenged the punishment of compulsory retirement on the ground that the chargesheet dated
22nd February, 2010 is unsustainable in law and enquiry conducted by the Enquiry Officer against the Applicant is illegal,
invalid and improper one. He has also challenged the punishment of compulsory retirement being disproportionate,
improper and unjustified. Therefore, reinstatement with all consequential benefits has been claimed by the Applicant.
3.
The Opposite Party, Punjab National Bank has filed its written statement denying the allegations of the
Applicant and has pleaded interalia that the enquiry was conducted as per provisions of the bipartite settlement and the
Applicant was given all opportunity to defend his case. It has been further pleaded that the Applicant was posted in the
Branch on 1st of November, 2004 and according to his seniority and willingness he was re-designated as Head Cashier
which is not a post of promotion, but a special allowance carrying post only. On 10th March, 2009 he made payment of
Rs.8.30 lakh to the party without any debit authority causing shortage of cash. The Act of the Applicant was beyond the
purview of his duties and his activity was doubtful, therefore, FIR was lodged against him on 12th March, 2009 with the
Baharampur Police Station. It is further pleaded that good conduct, discipline and integrity are backbone of the
employees of the bank dealing with public money and no bank can keep in its employment a person whose conduct is not
upto the mark, who is indiscipline and whose integrity is doubtful. The charges leveled against the Applicant were grave
in nature and the punishment so imposed upon him commensurate to the gravity of the charges proved against the
Applicant.
4.
In reply to the written statement filed by the Opposite Party, Bank, the Applicant has also filed a rejoinder.
5.
As the validity of enquiry was challenged by the Applicant, this Tribunal took up that as a preliminary issue and
decided the same vide order dated 11th December, 2015 holding that the enquiry was valid, proper and conducted after
observing the principles of natural justice.
6.
After the enquiry having been held valid and legal, the next question for consideration is regarding the scope of
judicial review by the Tribunal under Section 11A of the Industrial Tribunal, 1947. Section 11A of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 reads as follows:
11A. Powers of Labour Courts, Tribunals and National Tribunals to give appropriate relief in case of
discharge or dismissal of workmen –
Where an industrial dispute relating to the discharge or dismissal of a workman has been referred to a Labour
Court, Tribunal or National Tribunal for adjudication and, in the course of the adjudication proceedings, the
Labour Court, Tribunal or National Tribunal, as the case may be, is satisfied that the order of discharge or
dismissal was not justified, it may, by its award, set aside the order of discharge or dismissal and direct re-
instatement of the workman on such terms and conditions, if any, as it thinks fit, or give such other relief to the
workman including the award of any lesser punishment in lieu of discharge or dismissal as the circumstances of
the case may require;
Provided that in any proceeding under this section the Labour Court, Tribunal or National Tribunal, as
the case may be, shall rely only on the materials on record and shall not take any fresh evidence in relation to the
matter.”
7.
Taking note of the words “in the course of adjudication”, Hon’ble the Supreme Court in M/s. Firestone Tyre &
Rubber Co. of India Ltd. v The Management, AIR 1973 SC 1227 has observed that
6860
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
“The words ‘in the course of adjudication proceedings, the Tribunal is satisfied that the order of discharge or
dismissal was not justified’ clearly indicate that the Tribunal is now clothed with the power of reappraise the
evidence in the domestic enquiry and satisfy itself whether the said evidence relied on by the employer
establishes the misconduct alleged against a workman. What was originally a plausible conclusion that could
be drawn by an employer from the evidence, has now given place to a satisfaction being arrived at by the
Tribunal that the finding of misconduct is correct. The limitation imposed on the powers of the Tribunal by
the decision in Indian Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. case law no longer be invoked by the employer. The Tribunal is
at liberty to consider not only whether the finding of misconduct recorded by an employer is correct but also
to differ from the said finding if a proper case is made out. What was once largely in the realm of the
satisfaction of the employer has ceased to be so and now it is the satisfaction of the Tribunal that finally
decides the matter.”
8.
After the enquiry has been held to be valid and legal, Hon’ble the Supreme Court has considered its effect in
Mavji C. Lakum v Central Bank of India, 2008 (7) SCALE 32 in the following words:
“……….Even if the enquiry is found to be fair, that would be only a finding certifying that all possible
opportunities were given to the delinquent and the principles of natural justice and fair play were observe. That
does not mean that the findings arrived at were essentially the correct findings. If the Industrial Tribunal comes
to the conclusion that the findings could not be supported on the basis of evidence given or further comes to the
conclusion that the punishment given is shockingly disproportionate, the Industrial Tribunal would still be
justified in re-appreciating the evidence and/or interfering with the quantum of punishment. There can be no
dispute that power under Section 11-A has to be exercised judiciously and the interference is possible only
when the Tribunal is not satisfied with the findings and further concludes that punishment imposed by the
Management is highly disproportionate with the degree of guilt of the workman concerned. Besides, the
Tribunal has to give reasons as to why it is not satisfied either with the findings or with the quantum of
punishment and that such reason should not be fanciful or whimsical but there should be good reasons.”
9.
Thus from the above pronouncements of the Hon’ble Apex Court it is established that the Tribunal has still
power to examine the correctness of the findings of the domestic enquiry as to whether findings are supported on the
basis of evidence on record. In other words the Tribunal can re-appreciate the findings of enquiry. However, the scope of
re-appreciation of evidence is again a matter of controversy. But in catena of cases it has been laid down that reappraisal
cannot be that of either or original or that of appellate court, but of revisionsal court. In Calcutta Jute Manufacturing
Company v. State of West Bengal, 2002-I-LLJ 224 (Calcutta High Court) it has been observed that –
“6. But that reappraisal cannot be that of either the original or of an appellate court, but of a revisional court.
Or, in other words, it is clothed with the additional power of reappraisal of evidence with a revisional court’s
outlook. The satisfaction of a court scrutinizing that an employer to justify the action. On such reappraisal it has
to satisfy itself that on such evidence the action could be justified. There remains a thin distinction in the
exercise of such jurisdiction. In the name reappraisal it cannot weigh the evidence in the same manner as an
original or appellate court when the enquiry is found to have been held validly.”
10.
Thus, it is clear that though the Industrial Tribunal has got power to reappraise the evidence available on record
of domestic enquiry, but at the same time the Tribunal has also to bear in mind the thin distinction between an
original/appellate decision and revisional decision, while examining for satisfaction about the justificatio0n of the action
taken by the employer/disciplinary authority.
11.
Scrutinizing the present case from the above angle, the allegations of misconduct against the workman
concerned was found to be proved by the evidence adduced during the enquiry. It is alleged that while working as Head
Cashier in the Bank he paid Rs.8,30,000/= to one customer of the Bank named Haren Mondal without debiting his
account and reported to the Branch Manager shortage of cash of Rs.8.30 lakh from his custody thereby jeopardized the
interest of the Bank. The workman concerned has not denied payment of amount to the customer on 10th March, 2009,
but he has claimed to have obtained a cheque and endorsement of Branch Manager to pay, against which payment was
made but there is nothing on record to show existence of cheue. The matter was reported to the Police Station. However,
the amount of Rs.8.30 lakh was deposited in cash by the customer, Shri Haren Mondal. These are the admitted facts as it
is evident from the representation submitted by the workman concerned. The workman, Shri Asesh Kumar Mishra had
informed the Investigating Officer of the case that on 10th March, 2009 at about 1.45 P.M. Shri Haren Mondal
approached him and handedover a cheque of Rs.8,30,000/= requesting for immediate payment. He has also mentioned in
his representation, Ext. W-2 that Haren Mondal has accounts in the concerned branch and is a respectable customer of
the branch. So he paid him amount hoping that everything will run well. But, unfortunately due to closure of bank credit
was not received in his account, hence cheque could not be paid. Though during enquiry, Enquiry Officer has concluded
that no trace of cheque was found, but the facts remain that Rs.8,30,000/= was paid by the concerned workman to Shri
Haren Mondal without debiting his account. This fact is also proved by the subsequent deposit of the amount on
16th March, 2009. In these circumstances, the conclusion of Enquiry Officer that the workman concerned paid
Rs.8,30,000/= to Shri Haren Mondal without debiting his account cannot be said to be based on no evidence or perverse.
The Tribunal acting reasonably cannot be said to come to a different conclusion. Therefore, no interference by this
Tribunal is warranted.
12.
Now the next point for consideration is only with regard to the punishment imposed. Where the enquiry has
been found to be valid and there is no perversity in the conclusion drawn by the Enquiry Officer, then only question
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6861
remains for consideration is whether the punishment of dismissal requires interference or not. In this regard Hon’ble the
Apex Court in Management of Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. v M. Mani, 2018 LLR 2 has observed:
“17. In our opinion, once the Labour Court upheld the departmental enquiry as being legal and proper then the
only question that survived for consideration before the Labour Court was whether the punishment of
“dismissal” imposed by the appellant to the respondents was legal and proper or it requires any interference in
its quantum.
18. In other words, the Labour Court should have then confined its enquiry to examine only one limited question
as to whether the punishment given to the respondents was, in any way, disproportionate to the gravity of the
charge leveled against them and this, the Labour Court should have examined by taking recourse to the
provisions ofSection 11-A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. ………”
13.
Thus where the action of the disciplinary authority is found to be harsh and disproportionate to the gravity of
charges leveled against the concerned workman, the Tribunal has power to interfere with the order of punishment and
grant appropriate relief. It is material to note here that the charges against the workman are not of misappropriation of
fund, but as a Head Cashier he failed to hold Bank’s cash in safe custody and thereby jeopardized the interest of the
Bank. It is not denied that the customer, Shri Haren Mondal to whom the amount was paid by the workman concerned
was not having account in the Bank. This fact is also not dispute that he had been instrumental in mobilizing fund for the
Bank in the past. So, in the present competitive atmosphere among banks in providing personalized services to the
customers, a favour by a bank employee to the extent of making hustle-free payment cannot be ruled out. It is admitted
fact that the amount paid to the customer was deposited by him after 4 days of lodging FIR. The integrity of the workman
concerned is not doubtful as it has been certified by the same Branch Manager to had lodged FIR. The Branch Manager,
Shri S.N. Mishra had given a certificate which is Exhibit M-03 that Shri Asesh Kumar Mishra is honest and dutiful an
helpful in mobilizing deposits and other bank’s business. It is further certified that he has been working in the Branch
since 1st November, 2004 and no adverse comment received about him and nothing was found against him since he had
taken charge of the Branch. On the basis of this certificate the criminal complaint lodged by the Branch Manager was
dropped by the Investigating Officer. Thus, only allegation against the workman can be said to be making of payment
against norms and rules of the Bank.
14.
Learned counsel for the workman has contended that It may be possible that the workman concerned acted
proactively in good faith in making payment which amounts to only an act of negligence, not amounting to misconduct,
but his intention cannot be said to be dishonest, as no manipulation in records was found. For his contention learned
counsel has relied on Narendra Kumar Tripathi v. Union of India & Others, CDJ 2010 Cal HC 417. It is true that there is
no finding of Enquiry Officer that the workman had acted with mala fide intention but his action in making payment
cannot be said to be error of judgment or act of negligence by any stretch of imagination. It was also not incorrect
judgment as payment was made intentionally knowing that it was not permissible under rules of the Bank. His act was
not consistent with due and faithful discharge of his duties. In Union of India v. J. Ahmed, AIR 1979 SC 1022 it has been
held that if a government servant conducts himself in a way which is not consistent with due and faithful discharge of his
duties, it is misconduct. Similarly, an error or omission resulting in serious or atrocious consequences amounts to
misconduct. Acting beyond one’s authority is by itself a breach of discipline and is misconduct. Thus in view of above
case law of the Hon’ble Apex Court conduct of workman was clearly misconduct.
15.
Though the workman is said to be an honest employee and there was no complaint against him in past, but his
conduct in making payment against rules of the Bank without debiting account cannot be justified only because he was
honest employee and have been instrumental in mobilizing fund and business of the Bank, but the punishment awarded
against him certainly appears to be harsh and disproportionate to the charges leveled against him and where the
punishment is disproportionate and harsh, the Tribunal has power to interfere with the punishment order of compulsory
retirement and award appropriate relief. In the facts and circumstances of the case, a lesser punishment would have
served the purpose. Throwing away a honest and upright employee from employment of the Bank is not only loss to the
Bank but also to the family of the employee concerned. While awarding the punishment the disciplinary authority did not
take into account the certificate, Exhibit M-03 issued by the Branch Manager regarding honesty of the workman. Thus
the charges proved are not that serious which warrant compulsory retirement.
16.
In view of above, punishment of compulsory retirement is liable to be set aside and lesser punishment of
stoppage of three increments permanently is justifiable. However, it is discretion of the management of the Bank to
permit him to work either in cash department or somewhere else.
17.
So far as back wages are concerned, no basis or formula can be laid down as to under what circumstances
payment of entire back wages should be allowed. It depends upon the facts and circumstances of each case. In U.P.
Brushware Corporation v Uday Narayan Pandey, (2006) 1 SCC 479 the Hon’ble Supreme Court has held that payment of
back wages is not automatic where the action of the management is set aside. It should not be granted mechanically only
because on technical ground or otherwise when an order of termination was found to be in contravention of the
provisions of the Act.
18.
Further in General Manager, Hariyana Roadways v. Rudhan Singh, (2005) 5 SCC 591 it has been held that
“8. There is no rule of thumb that in every case where the IndustrialTribunal gives a finding that the
termination of service was in violation of provisions of Section 25F of the Act, entire back wages should
beawarded. A host of factors like the manner and method of selection and appointment viz. whether after proper
advertisement of the vacancy or inviting applications from the employment exchange, nature of appointment,
6862
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
namely whether ad-hoc, short-term, daily wages, temporary or permanent in character, any special
qualification required for the job and the like should be weighed and balanced in taking a decision regarding
award of back wages. One of the important factors, which has to be taken into consideration is the length of
service which the workman rendered with the employer. If the workman had rendered a considerable period of
service and his services were wrongfully terminated, he may be awarded full or partial back wages keeping in
view the fact that at his age and qualification possessed by him, he may not be in a position to get another
employment. However, where the total length of service rendered by a workman is very small, award of back
wages for complete period viz. from the date of termination till the date of award, which our experience shows
is often quite large would be wholly inappropriate.”
19.
At the same time the workman is required to prove that he remained unemployed during the period in question.
Hon’ble the Supreme Court in Navartis Limited v. State of West Bengal, (2009) 3 SCC 124 has held that
“19. There can, however, be no doubt whatsoever that there has been a in the approach of this Court with
regard to payment of back wages. Back wages cannot be granted almost automatically upon setting aside an
order of termination inter alia on the premises that the burden to show that the workman
was
gainfully
employed during interregnum period was on the employer. This Court in a number of decisions opined that the
grant of back wages is not automatic. Burden of proof that he remained unemployedwould be on the workman
keeping in view the provisions of Section 106 of Evidence Act, 1872.”
20.
But, in the present case, it is not in dispute that the workman did not raise any plea in the statement of
claim/application that he was not gainfully employed during the said period. He has also not stated in his examination-in-
chief that he was not employed gainfully for the period in question. A burden lies on the workman to prove this fact and
in the present case the workman concerned has failed to do so, this Tribunal comes to the conclusion that the workman
concerned is not entitled to any back wages.
21.
Thus to conclude, the action of the management of Punjab National Bank in imposing punishment of
compulsory retirement by order dated 6th October, 2010 upon the workman, Shri Asesh Kumar Mishra being harsh and
disproportionate to the gravity of charges is set aside and reinstating him in service with a lesser punishment of stoppage
of three increments with cumulative effect is awarded to the workman concerned. However, he is not entitled to any back
wages. The workman should feel satisfied with his reinstatement.
22.
Application of the workman under Section 2A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is allowed accordingly.
Award is made accordingly.
JUSTICE RAVINDRA NATH MISHRA, Presiding Officer
Dated, Kolkata,
The 28th November, 2018
ubZ fnYyh] 7 fnlEcj] 2018
dk- vk- 1786-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj iatkc
xzkeh.k cSad izca/k rarz ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k ua 2 paMhx<+ ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 81@2014½ dks izdkf’kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 07-12-2018
izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&12012@59@2014&vkbZvkj ¼ch&1½]
Ckh- ,l- fc"V] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 7th December, 2018
S. O. 1786.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 81/2014) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No.2,
Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Punjab Gramin Bank and
their workmen, received by the Central Government on 07.12.2018.
[No. L-12012/59/2014-IR(B-1)]
B. S. BISHT, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT No. 2,
CHANDIGARH
ID No. 81/2014
Shri Amrik Singh ,
S/o. Shri Piara Singh,
H.No77 Germany Dass Park,
Kapurthala, Punjab.
…Workman/Claimant
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6863
Versus
The Chairman,
Punjab Gramin Bank,
Head office Jalandhar Road,
Kapurthala
Punjab.
… Management/Respondent
AWARD
This Award shall decide a reference which was made to this Tribunal by the Appropriate Government letter
No.L-12012/59/2014-IR(B-1) dated 3.12.2014 under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of
the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(in short the Act) for adjudication of an industrial dispute, terms of which are as under:
‘Whether the action of the management of Punjab Gramin Bank, Kapurthala, in terminating the services of Shri
Amrik Singh s/o. Shri Piara Singh vide order dated 31.1.2004 is just, valid and legal ? If not, to what relief the
workman is entitled for and what directions are necessary in the matter ?’
2.
Both parties were put to notice and the claimant., Shri Piara Singh filed his statement of claim, with the
averments that he was working as clerk cum cashier under the Management and vide order dated 31/1/2014 the
Disciplinary Authority imposed penalty of his removal from service which would not be a disqualification for future
employment. It is stated that before his removal from service, no legal charges were framed against him, though a vague
and baseless charge-sheet was served upon him and he was not given a reasonable opportunity to give reply to the charge
sheet. According to him, the Inquiry Officer conducted the inquiry illegally and arbitrarily and had rejected the demand
of the workman to summon the relevant record. Even otherwise, the punishment inflicted upon the workman is too
harsh and does not commensurate to the gravity of alleged charges inasmuch as the Management Bank has not suffered
any loss nor any harm has been caused to the reputation of the Bank. Prayer has been made for reinstatement of the
claimant with continuity of service and all consequential benefits.
3.
Management resisted the claim of the Workman, by filing written statement and took preliminary objections
that the workman has approached this Tribunal after a gap of 10 years and no proper explanation has been given by him
for the delay and therefore the present dispute is not maintainable. While denying the allegations of the claimant, it has
been stated that the claimant was found guilty of commission of serious major misconduct and fraudulent activities while
he was working as clerk cum cashier, for which a proper charge sheet dated 2/8/2003 was served upon him and he was
afforded proper opportunity of hearing. The enquiry officer had conducted the inquiry in fair and reasonable way and
adequate opportunity was given to the workman to defend his case. The enquiry Officer submitted his report dated
17/12/2003, on the basis of which the Disciplinary Authority had awarded major penalty of removal from service, upon
the workman, after opportunity of personal hearing was granted which was availed by the workman on 28/1/2004.
Against the order dated 31/1/2003 of the Disciplinary authority, the workman preferred a departmental appeal dated
23/2/2004 which was rejected by the Appellate Authority vide order dated 24/3/2004 as there was no merits in the
submissions of the workman. Thus, prayer has been made for dismissal of the claim petition.
4.
Number of opportunities were granted to the Claimant/workman to lead evidence in support of his claim but he
failed to adduce any evidence. He even did not enter the witness box either to substantiate the averments made in the
claim petition or to rebut the case of the Management. Perusal of the record shows that the claimant did not appear
before the Tribunal from 15/2/2018 onwards despite the fact that matter was adjourned time and again and ultimately this
Tribunal was constrained to reserve the matter for passing the award.
5.
In view of the fact that the claimant has not led any evidence in support of his case, this Tribunal is constrained
to pass No Dispute Award in the matter. Since the matter has not been decided on merits, there will be no bar for the
claimant to file afresh claim petition in accordance with law for adjudication of the controversy in issue or to seek any
other relief to which he is otherwise entitled to. Award is passed accordingly.
AVTAR CHAND DOGRA, Presiding Officer
नई िदल् ली, 7 िदसम् बर, 2018
का. आ. 1787. —कमर्चारी राज् य बीमा अिधिनयम 1948 (1948 का 34) की धारा-1 की उपधारा (3) ᳇ारा
पर्दᱫ शिक्तयᲂ का पर्योग करते हुए, केन् दर्ीय सरकार एतारा 1 िदसम् बर, 2018 को उस तारीख के रूप मᱶ िनयत करती है,
िजसको उक् त अिधिनयम के अध् याय-4 (44 व 45 धारा के िसवाय जो पहले से पर्वृᱫ हो चुकी है) अध् याय – 5 और 6 (धारा -
76 की उपधारा-(1) और धारा-77, 78, 79 और 81 के िसवाय जो पहले ही पर्वृᱫ की जा चुकी है) के उपबंध नागालᱹड राज् य
के िनम् निलिखत क्षेतर्ᲂ मᱶ पर्वृᱫ हᲂगे, अथार्त् –
6864
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
राज् य
िजला
राजस् व केन् दर्
नागालᱹड
मोकोकचुंग
मोकोकचुंग म् यूिनिसपल कᲅिसल
[सं. एस-38013/09/2018-एस.एस.I]
संतोष कुमार िसह, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 7th December, 2018
S.O. 1787.—In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-Section (3) of Section 1 of the Employees State
Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948), the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st December, 2018 as the date on which
the provisions of Chapter IV (except Section 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force) and Chapter-V and
VI (except Sub-Section (1) of Section 76 and Section 77, 78, 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force) of
the said Act shall come into force in the following areas of State of Nagaland namely : -
STATE
DISTRICT
ALL THE AREAS FALLING UNDER
NAGALAND
Mokokchung
Mokokchung MUNICIPAL COUNCIL
[No. S-38013/09/2018-S.S.I]
S. K. SINGH, Under Secy.
ubZ fnYyh] 7 fnlEcj] 2018
dk- vk- 1788-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh; ljdkj
esllZ ,e-lh-,y- ds izca/k ra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh;
ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] Hkqous’oj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 78/2016½ dks izdkf’kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh;
ljdkj dks 04-12-2018 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&22013@01@2018&vkbZvkj ¼lh,e&II)]
jktsUnz flag] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 7th December, 2018
S. O. 1788.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 78/2016) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,
Bhubaneswar as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s M.C.L and their
workmen, received by the Central Government on 04.12.2018.
[No. L-22013/01/2018-IR (CM-II)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT BHUBANESWAR
Present: Shri B.C. Rath, Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-cum-Labour
Court, Bhubaneswar.
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 78/2016
(Filed under section 2-A(2) of the I.D. Act)
Date of Passing Order – 5th June, 2018
Between:
1. M/s. Guru Gobinda Logistics Pvt. Ltd. (Contractor),
Ananta Opencast Project Area, C/o. MCL,
Near Siva Mandir, Po. - Dera Colliery,
Talcher, Dist. Angul, Odisha.
2. General Manager, Bharatpur Opencast Project,
Mahanadi Coalfields Limited,
At./Po. Talcher, Dist. Angul, Odisha.
1st Party-Managements
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6865
(And)
Shri Biren Sahoo,
At./Po. Ghantapada, Via-Dera,
P.S. Colliery, Dist. Angul, Odisha, Pin-759 103.
…2nd Party-Disputant
Appearances:
Auth. Representatives.
…
For the 1st Party- Managements
Shri Biren Sahoo.
…
For himself the 2nd Party- Disputant
ORDER
The 2nd party-applicant and the authorized representatives of the Managements are present. A petition is moved
on behalf of the 2nd party-applicant wherein prayer has been made for withdrawal of the dispute on a contention that he
had voluntarily abandoned and resigned from service on his own accord on 31.3.2015 and he raised an industrial dispute
being instigated by others. Hence, the matter has been resolved amicably and he is no more interested to prosecute the
dispute. On being read-over and explained on the content of the petition, the workman admits to have filed the petition
voluntarily without being influenced by any one. He, further, submits that he is aware of the contents of the petition
which is drafted as per his instruction and knowing the contention to be correct he signed the same. Having regard to the
submission advanced by the 2nd party-applicant the application under section 2-A(2) stands dismissed on being
withdrawal of the dispute by the 2nd party-applicant.
Dictated & Corrected by me.
B. C. RATH, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 7 fnlEcj] 2018
dk- vk- 1789-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ
flaxkjsuh dksfy;jht daiuh fyfeVsM ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd
fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] xksnkofj[kkuh ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k – 85/2015½ dks izdkf’kr
djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 04-12-2018 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&22013@01@2018&vkbZvkj ¼lh,e&II]
jktsUnz flag] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 7th December, 2018
S.O. 1789.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 85/2015) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,
Godavarikhani as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries
Company Ltd., and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 04.12.2018.
[No. L-22013/01/2018-IR (CM-II)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CHAIRMAN, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT-CUM-VI ADDL.DIST. &
SESSIONS COURT, GODAVARIKHANI
Present: SRI SAMBASIVA RAO NAIDU,
Chairman-cum-Presiding Officer,
TUESDAY, ON THIS THE 14th DAY OF AUGUST, 2018
I.D.No. 85 of 2015
Between:
Jilukara Lingaiah, S/o.Lachaiah, age 52 years,
Occ:Ex.Coal Filler Relay C place of work RK 5 Section SRP,
R/o.Q.No.ST2-338, Bus stand colony, Godavarikhani (T)
of Ramagundam Mandal of Karimnagar District.
…Applicant/Workman- Petitioner
6866
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
AND
1.
The General Manager, SCCL Collieries Company Ltd., Srirampoor, Adilabad.
2.
The Superintendent of Mines, RK-5 Incline, Srirampoor Area, SCCL Collieries Company Ltd., Srirampoor,
Adilabad Dsitrict.
3.
The Chairman and Managing Director,
SCCL Collieries Company Ltd., Kothagudem
… Employer/Respondents/Management
This case coming before me for final hearing in the presence of Kum. E.Shobharani, Advocate for the Petitioner and of
Sri D.Krishna Murthy, Advocate for the Respondents; and having been heard and having stood over for consideration till
this day, the Tribunal delivered the following:-
AWARD
1.
This is a petition filed by petitioner under section 2A (2) of Industrial Disputes Act which herein after will be
referred as ID Act for convenience sake with a prayer to set aside the dismissal order vide proceedings reference
No.SRP/PER/13.008/1688, dt.29-04-2014 and to direct the respondent No.1 to 3 to reinstate the petitioner into service
with continuity of service, attendant benefits and full back wages. The following is the brief case of petitioner as per his
petition:
2.
The petitioner was appointed as Badli Filler on 01-11-1989 on piece rate wages at GDK 6 Incline, his service
was regularized and was appointed as coal filler w.e.f., 01-01-1995. He was discharging his duties as per the directions
of the management without causing any loss and he served the company a lot. The 1st respondent issued a charge sheet
against the petitioner alleging that he was absent from duties without sufficient cause and without sanction of leave from
01-01-2011 to 31-12-2011. A charge sheet in the following terms has been served on the petitioner on 07-06-2012:
“Absent from duty without sanctioned leave or sufficient cause or over staying beyond sanctioned leave”.
3.
The 1st respondent has alleged that the copy of charge sheet was sent to the petitioner through registered post
with acknowledgement due and it was returned undelivered by the postal authorities. An enquiry officer was appointed
by the 1st respondent and the said enquiry officer conducted enquiry on 20-09-2012 in the presence of presenting officer
by name P.Mallaiah, office superintendent G.Mohan, Senior Assistant, RK-5 Incline and S.Lingaiah, General Mazdoor.
The petitioner was absent during the enquiry, the 1st respondent has claimed that notice was not served on the petitioner
thereby a copy of the said notice was published in Andhra Jyothi Telugu Daily newspaper dt.06-09-2012 with a direction
to the petitioner to attend enquiry on 20-09-2012. The 1st respondent dismissed the petitioner w.e.f., 05-05-2014. The
petitioner has further pleaded that a criminal case vide Cr.No.175/2007 for the offence under sections 302, 120-B IPC
was registered by police Ramakrishnapur. The petitioner was shown as A-4. He has faced the trial before III Addl.
Sessions Judge (FTC), Asifabad in S.C.No.315/2009. The petitioner while furnishing the details of the said criminal case
further pleaded that on the complaint of D.Thara that her brother by name Ch.Sudhakar was killed near Edgah (Dargah)
of Ramakrishnapur a case was registered and the petitioner herein was shown as accused No.4. After the trial the learned
III Addl. Sessions Judge, Asifabad convicted the petitioner and other (4) accused on 08-02-2010 and sentenced them to
undergo imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs.3000/- each. The petitioner was in jail till 2013, his appeal was
allowed by Hon’ble High Court. The petitioner herein was acquitted and released on 04-08-2014. Thereafter he has
obtained the copies of dismissal order from the respondent. The petitioner claims that on 09-02-2010 there was a news in
all the news papers about the above referred criminal case and involvement of petitioner herein. Since he was in jail he
could not inform the respondents about his detention. Even though the respondents have got information, they did not
sent any notice to the petitioner nor they tried to serve the notice through jailor, but proceeded with the enquiry.
4.
Therefore, according to the petitioner he was not having any information about the enquiry. The enquiry was
conducted without service of proper notice on the petitioner. He has also pleaded that the witnesses who were examined
at the time of enquiry also got knowledge about the criminal case and imprisonment of the petitioner. The son of the
petitioner informed the authorities about the criminal case and that his father was in jail. Even at the time of enquiry the
son of the petitioner informed the officials that his father was in jail. Therefore, now the petitioner claims that the above
said enquiry results his dismissal from service but in view of the said criminal case he could not participate in the
enquiry. As such now he is praying for setting aside the dismissal order and for reinstatement into service with all back
wages and attendant benefits. The respondents have opposed this application and R-1 filed a counter which was adopted
by the remaining two respondents. The following is the brief case of respondents as per their counter:
5.
The petitioner was appointed as Badli Filler on 01-03-1988, he was regularized as coal filler on 03-01-1995.
The respondents have disputed the claim of petitioner that he worked to the satisfaction of the management and put the
petitioner to strict proof of his case. The respondents have pleaded that the petitioner was never regular to his duties, he
was a chronic absentee who was never put in required musters. Earlier he was served charge sheet dt.26-03-2011 for his
unauthorized absenteeism during 2010. After completing disciplinary proceedings he was reverted by (3) special piece
rated allowance with cumulative effect vide proceedings dt.25-06-2012. The services of the employees of Singareni
Collieries Company are covered by company standing orders. According to the section 52 (2) of Mines Act underground
employee required to put minimum musters of 190 and for surface employee 240 days in a year. The petitioner being
underground employee he is expected to put him 190 musters in a calendar year. He never put such minimum musters.
In 2011 he was charge sheeted under clause 25.31 of company’s standing orders. The respondents have furnished the
attendance particulars of the petitioner which indicates his attendance in 2007 was 147 and in 2008 it was 155, in 2009 it
was 202 whereas in 2010 it was 28. He did not attend the duty from 2011 to 2013. In view of the above stated failure of
¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940
6867
the petitioner he was served with a charge sheet about his absence to the duties. Since he was continuously absent the
charge sheet was sent to the residence of petitioner by registered post by acknowledgement due but it was returned un-
delivered. The respondents got the notice published in Andhra Jyothi Telugu newspaper dt.26-09-2012. The petitioner
was informed to attend the enquiry scheduled on 20-09-2012 but he failed to appear before the enquiry officer. As such
an exparte enquiry was conducted on 20-09-2012. The enquiry officer submitted report against the petitioner herein. A
show cause notice was sent to him through registered post which was also returned un-served. Therefore, the
respondents got published the said notice in Andhra Jyothi Telugu Daily newspaper dt.28-06-2013. There was no
response from the respondents thereby the petitioner was removed from the service and dismissal order was displayed on
the notice board on the respondent company on 05-05-2014. The respondents have claimed that they are not aware of the
criminal case filed against the petitioner herein. They have no information nor they have received any letter dt.15-01-
2011. Therefore, according to the respondents they have followed the procedure and the petitioner was removed from
service due to his continuous absence to the duties.
6.
The respondents have further pleaded there were more than Rs.60,000/- employees which includes workers,
executives, supervisors, the production result will depend upon each and every employee they are interlinked. If any one
remains absent without prior permission, the work to be performed get effected. The unauthorized absence creates
sudden void, which at times difficult to fill up and there will be no proper planning. Therefore, the respondent company
is compelled to take severe action against the unauthorized absentees. The petitioner is one such unauthorized absentee
having put nil musters and failed to improve his attendance and work performance thereby the respondent prayed for
dismissal of the petition.
7.
When the matter is posted for enquiry the petitioner filed petition under section 11-A of Industrial Disputes Act
on 04-04-2017 and reported no objection against the enquiry proceedings. For convenience sake I am reproducing what
the petitioner has stated in the said petition.
“In the afore said the applicant/workmen-petitioner filed application set aside the illegal dismissal from the
service vide proceedings dated 29-04-2014 and directed the respondent to reinstate the petitioner in to service
with continuity of service, together with all attendant benefits and with full back wages. The petitioner is not
disputing the procedure and validity of domestic enquiry but the finding are perverse and bias. The Hon’ble
Court has got wide powers and in the interest of justice pleased to proceed with the case by the material
available on record and be pleased to not to make any fresh evidence in relation of the matter.’’
8.
Therefore, when once he filed a memo under section 11-A of Industrial Disputes Act and reported his
satisfaction to the domestic enquiry he cannot question the manner in which it was conducted. In the petition itself the
petitioner has categorically stated that he is not disputing the procedure and validity of the domestic enquiry but
according to him findings given by the enquiry officer are perverse and biased.
Therefore, the point for consideration is whether the findings of the enquiry officer are perverse or biased, if
so, whether the petitioner can be reinstated into service?
9.
The respondents did not dispute the claim of the petitioner that he was involved in a criminal case and he was
sentenced to life imprisonment and he was in jail for (5) years and later his appeal was allowed by the Hon’ble High
Court etc. In the counter they have claimed that they are not aware of the criminal proceedings. When once the
petitioner is sentenced to life imprisonment it may not be possible for him to proceed in the enquiry and to place his
claim before the enquiry officer. However in the light of his own petition under section 11-A of Industrial Disputes Act,
now the petitioner cannot question the procedure adopted by the enquiry officer and he cannot question the domestic
enquiry. The petitioner claimed that he was convicted by the III Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Asifabad on 08-02-
2010. Therefore, he cannot attended the duties from 08-02-2010 however in the counter the respondents have
categorically stated that the petitioner was a chronic absentee, he did not put required musters even in 2007, 2008, his
attendance in 2007 was 147 whereas in 2008 it was 155. As per the attendance furnished by the respondent the petitioner
has put 202 musters in 2009. According to his own claim the petitioner was involved for a murder case and he was
sentenced to life imprisonment. Therefore, he could not have attended the duties in 2010. There is no explanation from
the petitioner for his failure in attending the required musters during 2007, 2008. The petitioner having accepted the
domestic enquiry by way of filing petition under section 11-A of Industrial Disputes Act, now cannot question the
procedure adopted by the enquiry officer. Since, he did not attend the required musters in 2007, 2008. The findings of
the enquiry officer about his continuous absence and about his guilt cannot be set aside. The petitioner was rightly
dismissed from service for his absence to the duties. As such, the petitioner is not entitled to any relief and the present
petition is liable to be dismissed.
10.
In the result, the Industrial Dispute is dismissed.
Dictated to Senior Stenographer, transcribed by him, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court, on this the 14th
day of August, 2018.
SAMBASIVA RAO NAIDU, Chairman-cum-Presiding Officer
6868
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
WITNESSES EXAMINED
FOR WORKMAN:-
FOR MANAGEMENT;-
-Nil-
-Nil-
EXHIBITS
FOR WORKMAN:-
Ex.W-1
Dt.
16-09-2009
C.C., of judgment in SC.No.19/2009
Ex.W-2
Dt.
14-06-2016
Release certificate
Ex.W-3
Dt.
14-06-2016
Release certificate
Ex.W-4
Dt.
30-08-2011
Original charge sheet
Ex.W-5
Dt.
20-08-2011
Enquiry report
Ex.W-6
Dt.
20-09-2012
Enquiry proceedings
Ex.W-7
Dt.
29-04-2014
Dismissal order
Ex.W-8
Dt.
08-02-2014
C.C., of judgment in S.C.No.315/2009
Ex.W-9
Dt.
18-07-2014
C.C., of judgment in Crl.A.No.279/2010 of Hon’ble High Court
Ex.W-10
Dt.
15-09-2011
Acknowledgement
Ex.W-11
Dt.
04-08-2014
Release order central prison, Warangal
Ex.W-12
Dt.
17-08-2015
Office copy of demand letter postal receipt
Ex.W-13
Dt.
--
Postal receipt
Ex.W-14
Dt.
--
Acknowledgement
FOR MANAGEMENT:-
Ex.M-1
Dt.
25-06-2012
Punishment order
Ex.M-2
Dt.
07-05-2012
Charge sheet
Ex.M-3
Dt.
06-09-2012
Charge sheet-cum-Enquiry notice published in Andhra Jyothi Telugu Daily News
Paper
Ex.M-4
Dt.
20-09-2012
Enquiry proceedings
Ex.M-5
Dt.
21-09-2012
Enquiry report
Ex.M-6
Dt.
20-05-2013
Notice
Ex.M-7
Dt.
--
Un-delivered postal cover with acknowledgement
Ex.M-8
Dt.
28-06-2013
Show cause notice published in Andhra Jyothi daily News Paper
Ex.M-9
Dt.
29-04-2014
Dismissal order
Ex.M-10
Dt.
29-04-2014
Copy of Dismissal order posted on the notice board by taking signature of two
witnesses.
Uploaded by Dte. of Printing at Government of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi-110064
and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi-110054. ALOK
KUMAR
Digitally signed by
ALOK KUMAR
Date: 2018.12.31
15:58:59 +05'30'