7000 GI/2018

(6595)

jftLVªh la- Mh- ,y- (,u) 04@0007@2003μ05

REGD. No. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05

izkf/dkj ls izdkf'kr

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

lkIrkfgd

WEEKLY

la- 49]

ubZ fnYyh] fnlEcj 9—fnlEcj 15] 2018] 'kfuokj@vxzgk;.k 18—vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

No. 49]

NEW DELHI, DECEMBER 9—DECEMBER 15, 2018, SATURDAY/AGRAHAYANA 18— AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

bl Hkkx esa fHkUu i`"B la[;k nh tkrh gS ftlls fd ;g i`Fkd ladyu ds :i esa j[kk tk lds

Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

Hkkx II—[k.M 3—mi&[k.M (ii)

PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)

Hkkjr ljdkj ds ea=kky;ksa (j{kk ea=kky; dks NksM+dj) }kjk tkjh fd, x, lkafof/d vkns'k vkSj vf/lwpuk,a

Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India

(Other than the Ministry of Defence)

िवदेश मंतर्ालय

(सी.पी.वी. पर्भाग)

नई िदल् ली, 12 नवम् बर, 2018

का.आ. 1749.—राजनियक और कᲂसुलीय अिधकारी (शपथ एवं फीस) के अिधिनयम, 1948 (1948 का 41) की

धारा 2 के खंड(क) के अनुसरण मᱶ वैधािनक आदेश ।

एतद᳇ारा, केन् दर् सरकार भारत के उच् चायोग, बर्ूनेई दारुस् सलाम मᱶ शर्ी ल᭯ मी कांत चोपड़ा, सहायक अनुभाग

अिधकारी को िदनांक 12 नवम् बर, 2018 से सहायक कᲂसुलर अिधकािरयᲂ के तौर पर कᲂसुलर सेवाᲐ के िनवर्हन के िलए

पर्ािधकृत करती है ।

[सं. टी. 4330/1/2017]

पर्काश चन् द, िनदेशक (कᲂसुलर)

6596

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS

(CPV Division)

New Delhi, the 12th November, 2018

S.O. 1749.—Statutory Order in pursuance of the clause (a) of the Section 2 of Diplomatic and Consular Officers

(Oaths and fees) Act, 1948 (41 of 1948), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Laxmi Kant Chopra, Assistant

Section Officer, as Assistant Consular Officer in High Commission of India, Brunei Darussalam to perform the Consular

services with effect from 12 November, 2018.

[No. T. 4330/01/2017]

PRAKASH CHAND, Director (Consular)

कािमक, लोक िशकायत और पᱶशन मंतर्ालय

(कािमक और पर्िशक्षण िवभाग)

नई िदल्ली, 30 नवम् बर, 2018

का.आ. 1750.— केन् दर्ीय सरकार, एत᳏ारा दंड पर्िकर्या संिहता, 1973 (1974 का 2) की धारा 24 की उपधारा (8)

᳇ारा पर्दत् त शिक् तयᲂ का पर्योग करते हुए लातूर (महाराष् टर्) िस् थत सतर् न् यायालयᲂ मᱶ िदल् ली िवशेष पुिलस स् थापना

(सीबीआई) ᳇ारा संस् थािपत लातूर सतर् मामला सं. 78/2014/या आर सी 04 (एस)/2016)सीबीआई (एस सी-1/नई िदल्ली

(कल् पना िगरी हत् याकांड) से उत् पन् न होने वाले अन् य मामलᲂ मᱶ अिभयोजन का संचालन तथा उससे संब᳍ और उसी संव् यवहार

मᱶ, पर्सांिगक अन् य मामलᲂ मᱶ अपील/पुनरीक्षण का संचालन करने के िलए शर्ी िशवाजी पर्ह्लादराव चवन, अिधवक् ता को

उनकी िनयुिक् त की तारीख से तीन वषᲄ के िलए या मामले के िनस् तारण तक, जो भी पहले हो, िवशेष लोक अिभयोजक के रूप

मᱶ िनयुक् त करती है।

[फा. सं. 225/14/2018-एवीडी-II]

एस.पी.आर. ितर्पाठी, अवर सिचव

MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS

(Department of Personnel and Training)

New Delhi, the 30th November, 2018

S.O. 1750.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (8) of section 24 of the Code of Criminal

Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Shivaji Prahladrao Chavan, Advocate as

Special Public Prosecutor for conducting the prosecution in Latur Sessions Case No. 78/2014 or other matters arising

out of RC 04(S)/2016/CBI/SC-1/New Delhi (Kalpana Giri murder case) instituted by the Delhi Special Police

Establishment (C.B.I.) in the Session Courts at Latur (Maharashtra) and appeals or revisions or other matters connected

therewith and incidental thereto for a period of three years from the date of appointment or disposal of the case,

whichever is earlier.

[F. No. 225/14/2018-AVD-II]

S.P.R. TRIPATHI, Under Secy.

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6597

पेटर्ोिलयम और पर्ाकृितक गैस मंतर्ालय

नई िदल्ली, 5 िदसम् बर, 2018

का. आ. 1751.—केन्दर्ीय सरकार को लोकिहत मᱶ यह आवश्यक पर्तीत होता है िक पि᳟म बंगाल राज्य मᱶ पारादीप

(उड़ीसा) से दुगार्पुर (पि᳟म बंगाल) तक वाया हिल्दया एलपीजी पिरवहन के िलए इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड के

दर्ारा एक पाइपलाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए ;

और केन्दर्ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन िबछाने के पर्योजन के िलए यह आवश्यक पर्तीत होता है िक ऐसी भूिम मᱶ जो इस से

उपाब᳍ अनुसूची मᱶ विणत है और िजसमᱶ उक्त पाइपलाइन िबछाऐ जाने का पर्स्ताव है, उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न िकया

जाए ;

अतः अब, केन्दर्ीय सरकार, पेटर्ोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन्स (भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न) अिधिनयम, 1962

(1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1) दर्ारा पर्दᱫ शिक्तयᲂ का पर्योग करते हुए, उस भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार का

अजर्न करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई ᳞िक्त, जो उक्त अनुसूची मᱶ विणत भूिम मᱶ िहतब᳍ है, उस तारीख से िजसको इस अिधसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपतर्

की पर्ितयॉ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस िदन के भीतर भूिम के नीचे पाइपलाइन िबछाए जाने के िलए

उसमᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार के अजर्न के सम्बन्ध मᱶ शर्ी िव᳡नाथ समाझदार, डब्ल्यू. बी. सी. एस. (पर्शासिनक) सेवािनवृᱫ

सक्षम पर्ािधकारी, पारादीप - हिल्दया - दुगार्पुर एलपीजी पाइपलाइन एवम् पारादीप - हिल्दया – बरौनी पाइपलाइन

ऑगमᱶटेशन योजना, डाकघर दुईल्या, आन्दुल-मौरी, मौरीगर्ाम हावड़ा-711 302 (पि᳟म बंगाल) को िलिखत रुप मᱶ आक्षेप

भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)17/2018-ओआर-I/ई-26864]

नोवस िकन् डो, अवर सिचव

MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS

New Delhi, the 5th December, 2018

S.O. 1751.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the

transportation of Liquefied Petroleum Gas from Paradip (Odisha) to Durgapur (West Bengal) Via Haldia a pipeline

should be laid in State of West Bengal by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire

the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule

annexed hereto;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals

Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its

intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which

copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the general public, object in writing to the

acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri Biswanath Samajder, W.B.C.S

िजला : हूगली राज्य: पिश्चम बंगाल

पुिलस ःटेशन

मौजा का नाम

खसरा सं.

क्षेऽफल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

मगरा

िडंगलहाट - 44

142

00

21

60

168

00

02

10

6598

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(Exe.) Retd.Competent Authority Paradip – Haldia –Durgapur LPG Pipeline & Augmentation of Paradip – Haldia –

Barauni Pipeline Project, P.O,Duillya, Andul - Mouri, Mourigram,Howrah, 711-302 (West Bengal).

[F. No. R-11025(11)17/2018/OR-I/E-26864]

NOAS KINDO, Under Secy.

नई िदल्ली, 5 िदसम् बर, 2018

का. आ. 1752.—केन्दर्ीय सरकार को ऐसा पर्तीत होता है िक लोक िहत मᱶ यह आवश्यक है िक आंधर् पर्देश राज्य मᱶ

पेटर्ोिलयम उत्पादᲂ के पिरवहन के िलए पारादीप-हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन पिरयोजना के िकर्यान्वयन हेतु इंिडयन ऑयल

कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड ᳇ारा पाइपलाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए;

और कᱶदर्ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन िबछाने के पर्योजन के िलए यह आवश्यक पर्तीत होता है िक ऐसी भूिम मᱶ जो इस से

ऊपाब᳍ अनुसूची मᱶ विणत है, और िजसमᱶ उक्त पाइपलाइन िबछाई जाने का पर्स्ताव है, उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न िकया

जाए;

अतः अब, केन्दर्ीय सरकार, पेटर्ोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन्स (भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न) अिधिनयम 1962

(1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1) ᳇ारा पर्दᱫ शिक्तयᲂ का पर्योग करते हुए उस भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार का

अजर्न करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

कोई भी ᳞िक्त, जो उक्त अनुसूची मᱶ विणत भूिम मᱶ िहतब᳍ है, उस तारीख से, िजसको इस अिधसूचना मᱶ युक्त भारत के

राजपतर् की पर्ितयाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हᱹ, इक्कीस (21) िदन के भीतर, भूिम के नीचे पाइपलाइन

िबछाए जाने के िलए उसमᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार के संबन्ध मᱶ शर्ी के. ए. एस जेि᳖सन, सक्षम पर्ािधकारी (आंधर् पर्देश), इंिडयन

ऑयल कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड (पाइपलाइन पर्भाग), पारादीप-हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन पिरयोजना, प्लॉट संख्या 33, कनका दुगार्

ऑिफससर् कॉलोनी, गुरुनानक नगर मेन रोड िवजयवाड़ा-520008, आंधर् पर्देश राज्य को िलिखत रूप से आक्षेप भेज सकेगा।

अनुसूची

िजला: वेस्ट गोदावरी राज्य: आन्धर्पर्देश

मंडल का नाम

गर्ाम का नाम

सवᱷ नम्बर

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

तल्लापुडी

तुपाकुलागुडेम

145

00

46

39

तल्लापुडी

अ᳖ादेवरपेटा

272/2

00

06

51

270

00

07

84

358

00

41

29

गोपालपुरम

गोपालपुरम

156/1

00

32

70

147

00

52

93

127/2

00

17

63

125

00

43

91

256/1

00

03

60

256/2A

00

10

80

SCHEDULE

District : Hooghly State : West Bengal

Police Station

Name of the Mouza

Khasra No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Square meter

1

2

3

4

5

6

Magra

Dingalhat - 44

142

00

21

60

168

00

02

10

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6599

गोपालपुरम

वेल्लािचतलागुडेम

550/1

00

24

78

537

00

30

33

538

00

28

26

कोय्यालागुडेम

कंकािदर्पुरम

88

00

05

78

कामावरपुकोटा

राम᳖ापालेम

20/9

00

06

21

16/1

00

13

68

18/7

00

05

44

18/6

00

04

89

18/5

00

04

81

19/4A

00

07

57

कामावरपुकोटा

कामावरपुकोटा

657/2

00

04

45

661/3

00

00

78

594/3

00

07

33

583/1

00

31

72

49/2

00

27

48

48

00

03

02

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)252/2017-ओ.आर-I/ई-21033]

नोवस िकन् डो, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 5th December, 2018

S.O. 1752.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government, that it is necessary in the public interest that for the

transportation of petroleum products in the state of Andhra Pradesh a pipeline should be laid for implementing Paradip-

Hyderabad Pipeline Project under Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary to

acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which is described in the

Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub Section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals

Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its

intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person who is interested in the land described in the said schedule, may submit objection in writing to Shri. K.A.S

Jennyson, Competent Authority (Andhra Pradesh), Indian Oil Corporation Limited (Pipelines Division), Paradip

Hyderabad Pipeline Project, Plot No. 33, Kanaka Durga officer’s Colony , Gurunank Nagar Main Road , Vijayawada -

520008 within twenty one (21) days from the date on which the copies of this notification issued under Sub-section (1)

of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the general public.

SCHEDULE

District : West Godavari

State : Andhra Pradesh

Name of Mandal

Name of Village

Survey No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Square

Metre

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

Tallapudi

Tupakulagudem

145

00

46

39

Tallapudi

Annadevarapeta

272/2

00

06

51

270

00

07

84

358

00

41

29

Gopalapuram

Gopalapuram

156/1

00

32

70

147

00

52

93

127/2

00

17

63

6600

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Gopalapuram

Gopalapuram

125

00

43

91

256/1

00

03

60

256/2A

00

10

80

Gopalapuram

Vellachintalagudem

550/1

00

24

78

537

00

30

33

538

00

28

26

Koyyalagudem

Kankadripuram

88

00

05

78

Kamavarapukota

Ramannapalem

20/9

00

06

21

16/1

00

13

68

18/7

00

05

44

18/6

00

04

89

18/5

00

04

81

19/4A

00

07

57

Kamavarapukota

Kamavarapukota

657/2

00

04

45

661/3

00

00

78

594/3

00

07

33

583/1

00

31

72

49/2

00

27

48

48

00

03

02

[F. No. R-11025(11)252/2017-OR-I/E-21033]

NOAS KINDO, Under Secy.

नई िदल्ली, 5 िदसम् बर, 2018

का. आ. 1753.—केन्दर्ीय सरकार ने पेटर्ोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न)

अिधिनयम, 1962 (1962 का 50) (िजसे इसमᱶ इसके प᳟ात उक्त अिधिनयम कहा गया है) की धारा 3 उप धारा (1) के

अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेटर्ोिलयम और पर्ाकृितक गैस मंतर्ालय की अिधसूचना, िजसका पर्काशन भारत के

राजपतर् संख्या 36, िदनांक 15.09.2018 कर्मांक संख्या 1379 िदनांक 10.09.2018 भाग II, खण्ड 3, उप-खण्ड (ii) मᱶ

िकया गया है। इस अिधसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची मᱶ िविनिद᳥ िहमाचल राज्य की तहसील हरोली, िजला उना की भूिम मᱶ,

पंजाब राज्य मᱶ गाँव

: झुिगयां, िजला शहीद भगत िसह नगर से िहमाचल पर्देश के गाँव : पेखुबेला, िजला उना तक पैटर्ोिलयम

उत्पादᲂ के पिरवहन के िलए इंिडयन ऑइल कापᲃरेशन िलिमटेड ᳇ारा पीएजेपीएल – उना बर्ांच पाइपलाइन पिरयोजना के

सम्बंध मᱶ पाइपलाइन िबछाने के पर्योजन के िलए उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न करने के िलए अपने आशय की घोषणा की

थी।

और उक्त राजपतर् अिधसूचनाᲐ की पर्ितयाँ जनता को तारीख 07.10.2018 तक उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी।

और उक्त अिधिनयम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1) के अनुसरण मᱶ सक्षम पर्ािधकारी ने केन्दर्ीय सरकार को अपनी िरपोटर् दे दी

है।

और केन्दर्ीय सरकार ने उक्त िरपोटर् पर िवचार करने के प᳟ात और यह समाधान हो जाने पर िक उक्त भूिम पाइपलाइन

िबछाने के िलए अपेिक्षत है, उसमᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न करने का िविन᳟य िकया है।

अत: अब, केन्दर्ीय सरकार उक्त अिधिनयम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1) ᳇ारा पर्दᱫ शिक्तयᲂ का पर्योग करते हुए घोषणा करती

है िक इस अिधसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची मᱶ िविनिद᳥ भूिम मᱶ पाइपलाइन िबछाने के उपयोग का अिधकार अिजत िकया जाए।

और केन्दर्ीय सरकार उक्त अिधिनयम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) ᳇ारा पर्दᱫ शिक्तयᲂ का पर्योग करते हुए, यह िनदᱷश देती है

िक उक्त भूिम मᱶ उपयोग का अिधकार इस घोषणा के पर्काशन की तारीख से केन्दर्ीय सरकार मᱶ िनिहत होने के बजाय सभी

िवल्लंगमᲂ से मुक्त होकर इंिडयन ऑयल कापᲃरेशन िलिमटेड मᱶ िनिहत होगा।

पेटर्ोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन अिधिनयम, 1962 की धारा 10 के अधीन िकसी भी क्षितपूित के िलए इंिडयन ऑयल

कापᲃरेशन िलिमटेड पूणर्तया उᱫरदायी होगी और पाइपलाइन से सम्बिन्धत िकसी भी मामलᱶ पर केन्दर्ीय सरकार के िवरु᳍

कोई वाद - दावा या कानूनी कायर्वाही नहᱭ हो सकेगी।

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6601

अनुसूची

िजला : उना राज्य :िहमाचल पर्देश

कर्.

सं.

तहसील का नाम

गाँव का नाम

हदबस्त नं

खसरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

1

हरोली

केलुवा

2920

00

02

02

2946

00

03

60

2953/2

00

03

07

2

हरोली

बाथू

475

1821

00

06

40

1822

00

02

65

1990

00

01

45

3

हरोली

टाहलीवाल उपरला

472

407/1

00

00

20

4

हरोली

नंगल खुदर्

474

2937

00

05

57

2938

00

00

40

2942

00

12

78

5

हरोली

मानुवाल

471

2548

00

10

26

2564

00

04

50

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)248/2017-ओआर-I/ई-18228]

नोवस िकन् डो, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 5th December, 2018

S.O. 1753.—Whereas, Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and

Natural Gas, published in the Gazette No. 36, dated 15.09.2018, S.O. No. 1379, dated 10.09.2018 Part-II, section 3, sub-

section (ii) issued under sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals pipelines (Acquisition of Right of

User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) the Central Government declared its

intention to acquire the right of user in the land situated in Tehsil Haroli of District Una in Himachal Pradesh State,

specified in the schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of

petroleum product from village Jhungian, District Shahid Bhagat Singh Nagar in the State of Punjab to village

Pekhubela, District Una in the State of Himachal Pradesh by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the

"PAJPL - Una Branch Pipeline project".

And whereas the copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on 07.10.2018.

And whereas the Competent Authority has under sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, has submitted his report of

Central Government.

And whereas, the Central Government after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is

required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of the user therein;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is

hereby acquired for laying the pipeline.

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government

hereby directs that the right of user of the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the Central

6602

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Government, vests on the date of publication of the declaration, in India Oil Corporation Limited, free from all

encumbrances.

India Oil Corporation Limited shall be exclusively liable for any compensation in terms of section 10 of the P & MP Act,

1962 and no suit, claim or legal proceeding would lie against the Central Government on any matter relating to pipeline.

SCHEDULE

[F. No. R-11025(11)248/2017-OR-I/E-18228]

NOAS KINDO, Under Secy.

नई िदल्ली, 5 िदसम् बर, 2018

का. आ. 1754.—केन्दर्ीय सरकार ने पेटर्ोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न)

अिधिनयम,1962 (1962 का 50) (िजसे इसमᱶ इसके प᳟ात उक्त अिधिनयम कहा गया है) की धारा 3 की उप धारा (1) के

अधीन जारी की गई, भारत सरकार के पेटर्ोिलयम और पर्ाकृितक गैस मंतर्ालय की अिधसूचना का.आ. 2024 तारीख

28.08.2017 िजसका पर्काशन भारत के राजपतर् संख्या 35, भाग-II, खण्ड 3, उप-खण्ड (ii) तारीख 02.09.2017 मᱶ िकया

गया है । इस अिधसूचना मᱶ संलग्न अनुसूची मᱶ िविनिद᳥ ओिड़शा राज्य के तहसील : शेरगढ़, िजला : गंजाम की भूिम मᱶ,

ओिड़शा राज्य मᱶ पारादीप से तेलंगाना राज्य मᱶ हैदराबाद तक पेटर्ोिलयम उत्पादᲂ के पिरवहन के िलये इंिडयन ऑयल

कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड के ᳇ारा िकर्यािन्वत िकए जा रहे "पारादीप-हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन पिरयोजना” के संबंध मᱶ पाइपलाइन

िबछाने के पर्योजन के िलये उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न करने के िलये अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी;

और उक्त राजपतर् अिधसूचना की पर्ितयाँ जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थᱭ। और उक्त अिधिनयम की धारा 6 की उपधारा

(1) के अनुसरण मᱶ सक्षम पर्ािधकारी नᱶ केन्दर्ीय सरकार को अपनी िरपोटर् दे दी है;

और केन्दर्ीय सरकार ने उक्त िरपोटर् पर िवचार करने के प᳟ात और यह समाधान हो जाने पर िक उक्त भूिम पाइपलाइन

िबछाने के िलये अपेिक्षत है, उसमᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न करने का िविनष्चय िकया है;

अत :अब, केन्दर्ीय सरकार उक्त अिधिनयम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1) ᳇ारा पर्दᱫ शिक्तयᲂ का पर्योग करते हुए एतद् ᳇ारा

घोषणा करती है िक इस अिधसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूिच मᱶ िविनिद᳥ भूिम मᱶ पाइपलाइन िबछाने के उपयोग का अिधकार

अिजत िकया जाए; और केन्दर्ीय सरकार उक्त अिधिनयम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) ᳇ारा पर्दᱫ शिक्तयᲂ का पर्योग करते हुए,

यह िनदᱷश देती है िक उक्त भूिम मᱶ उपयोग का अिधकार इस घोषणा के पर्काशन की तारीख से केन्दर्ीय सरकार मᱶ िनिहत होने

के बजाए सभी िबल्लंगमᲂ से मुक्त होकर इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड मᱶ िनिहत होगा।

District : Una State : Himachal Pradesh

Sr.

No.

Name of

Tehsil

Name of

Village

Hadbast

No.

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq. mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

1

Haroli

Keluwa

2920

00

02

02

2946

00

03

60

2953/2

00

03

07

2

Haroli

Bathu

475

1821

00

06

40

1822

00

02

65

1990

00

01

45

3

Haroli

Tahliwal

Upparla

472

407/1

00

00

20

4

Haroli

Nangal Khurd

474

2937

00

05

57

2938

00

00

40

2942

00

12

78

5

Haroli

Manuwal

471

2548

00

10

26

2564

00

04

50

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6603

िकिᱫपुर

1153

00

05

76

1231

00

01

13

1245

00

05

39

1257

00

02

07

1256

00

03

04

1255

00

00

10

1278

00

06

35

1277

00

05

58

1270

00

01

88

1509

00

11

60

1507

00

05

38

1524

00

05

31

1526

00

03

66

1572/1609

00

03

90

1572

00

04

60

1571

00

03

60

1570

00

04

81

1569

00

08

64

1583

00

06

82

1582

00

00

10

1592

00

00

66

1591

00

05

70

1593/1694

00

01

83

1601

00

05

72

1589

00

03

47

1602

00

08

98

1603

00

00

94

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)236/2017-ओआर-I/ई-13717]

नोवस िकन् डो, अवर सिचव

अनुसूची

तहसील- शेरगढ़

िजला - गंजाम

राज्य -ओिड़शा

गाँव का नाम

प्लॉट नं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6604

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 5th December, 2018

S.O. 1754.—Whereas, by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural

Gas, published in the Gazette of India No. 35 Part-II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii) dated 02.09.2017 vide S.O. Number

:2024 dated 28.08.2017 issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals pipelines (Acquisition

of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962),(hereinafter referred to as the said Act) the Central Government

declared its intension to acquire the right of user in the land situted in Tehsil-Sheragada, District-Ganjam in Odisha State,

specified in the schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of

petroleum products from Paradip in the State of Odisha to Hyderabad in the State of Telengana by the Indian Oil

Corporation Limited for implementing the “Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline Project”.

And whereas the copies of the Gazette were made available to the public. And whereas the Competent Authority has

under Sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, has submitted his report of Central Government;

And whereas, the Central Government after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is

required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of the user therein;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the schedule appended to this notification is

hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government

hereby directs that the right of user of the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the Central

Government, vests on the date of publication of the declaration, in Indian Oil Corporation Limited, free from all

encumbrances.

SCHEDULE

Tehsil: SHERAGADA

District : GANJAM

State : ODISHA

Name of the Village

Plot No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

KIRTIPUR

1153

00

05

76

1231

00

01

13

1245

00

05

39

1257

00

02

07

1256

00

03

04

1255

00

00

10

1278

00

06

35

1277

00

05

58

1270

00

01

88

1509

00

11

60

1507

00

05

38

1524

00

05

31

1526

00

03

66

1572/1609

00

03

90

1572

00

04

60

1571

00

03

60

1570

00

04

81

1569

00

08

64

1583

00

06

82

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6605

KIRTIPUR

1582

00

00

10

1592

00

00

66

1591

00

05

70

1593/1694

00

01

83

1601

00

05

72

1589

00

03

47

1602

00

08

98

1603

00

00

94

[F. No. R-11025(11)236/2017-OR-I/E-13717]

NOAS KINDO, Under Secy.

नई िदल्ली, 5 िदसम् बर, 2018

का. आ. 1755.—केन्दर्ीय सरकार ने पेटर्ोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन्स (भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न)

अिधिनयम, 1962 (1962 का 50) (िजसे इसमᱶ इसके प᳟ात उक्त अिधिनयम कहा गया है) की धारा 3 उप धारा (1) के

अधीन जारी की गई, भारत सरकार के पेटर्ोिलयम और पर्ाकृितक गैस मंतर्ालय की अिधसूचना संख्या का.आ.

1071(E),1073(E) और 1074(E) तारीख 03.04.2017 िजसका पर्काशन भारत के राजपतर् संख्या 948, भाग II, खण्ड 3,

उप खण्ड (ii) तारीख अपर्ैल 06, 2017, का.आ. 2028 तारीख िजसका पर्काशन भारत के राजपतर् संख्या 35 , भाग II, खण्ड

3, उप खण्ड (ii) तारीख अगस्त 27 – िसतंबर 02, 2017 और का.आ. 371 तारीख 16.12.2017 िजसका पर्काशन भारत के

राजपतर् संख्या 9, भाग II, खण्ड 3, उप खण्ड (ii) तारीख फरवरी 25 - माचर् 03, 2018 मᱶ िकया गया है। इस अिधसूचना मᱶ

संलग्न अनुसूची मᱶ िविनिद᳥ आंधर्पर्देश राज्य के पोलावरम, तल्लापुडी, गोपालपुरम, देवारापल्ली, कोय्यालागुडेम, ᳇ारका-

ितरुमला, कामावरपुकोटा, टी. नरसापुरम और िचतलापूडी मंडल वेस्टगोदावरी िजला की भूिम मᱶ, ओडीशा राज्य मᱶ पारादीप

से तेलंगाना राज्य मᱶ हैदराबाद तक पेटर्ोिलयम उत्पादᲂ के पिरवहन के िलए इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपᱷरेशन िलिमटेड के ᳇ारा

िकर्यािन्वत िकए जा रहे “पारादीप-हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन पिरयोजना”के संबंध मᱶ पाइपलाइन िबछाने के पर्योजन के िलए

उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न करने के िलए अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी:

और उक्त राजपतर् अिधसूचना की पर्ितयाँ जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थᱭ। और उक्त अिधिनयम की धारा 6 की उपधारा

(1) के अनुसरण मᱶ सक्षम पर्ािधकारी ने केन्दर्ीय सरकार को अपनी िरपोटर् दे दी है।

और केन्दर्ीय सरकार ने उक्त िरपोटर् पर िवचार करने के प᳟ात और यह समाधान हो जाने पर िक उक्त भूिम पाइपलाइन

िबछाने के िलए अपेिक्षत है, उसमᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न करने का िविनश् चय िकया है:

अतः अब, केन्दर्ीय सरकार उक्त अिधिनयम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1) ᳇ारा पर्दᱫ शिक्तयᲂ का पर्योग करते हुए एतद् ᳇ारा

घोषणा करती है िक इस अिधसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूिच मᱶ िविनिद᳥ भूिम मᱶ पाइपलाइन िबछाने के उपयोग का अिधकार

अिजत िकया जाए:

और केन्दर्ीय सरकार उक्त अिधिनयम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) ᳇ारा पर्दᱫ शिक्तयᲂ का पर्योग करते हुए, यह िनदᱷश देती है

िक उक्त भूिम मᱶ उपयोग का अिधकार इस घोषणा के पर्काशन की तारीख से केन्दर्ीय सरकार मᱶ िनिहत होने के बजाए सभी

िबल्लंगमᲂ से मुक्त होकर इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपᱷरेशन िलिमटेड मᱶ िनिहत होगा।

अनुसूची

िजला: वेस्टगोदावरी राज्य: आन्धर्पर्देश

मंडल का नाम

गर्ाम का नाम

सवᱷ नम्बर

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

पोलावरम

गुटाला

828

00

38

15

तल्लापुडी

तुपाकुलागुडेम

172/1B

00

09

06

172/2

00

27

72

6606

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

तल्लापुडी

तुपाकुलागुडेम

188

00

02

21

173/1

00

02

12

तल्लापुडी

अ᳖ादेवरपेटा

179/3

00

07

90

272/1

00

00

05

263/4A

00

05

25

267/2

00

19

74

267/1

00

24

04

332

00

24

78

360

00

14

74

गोपालपुरम

वेल्लािचतलागुडेम

590-2D

00

05

61

गोपालपुरम

गोपालपुरम

161

00

16

78

256/3A

00

10

80

गोपालपुरम

कोमिटकुंटा

61/1C

00

68

33

गोपालपुरम

वडलागुन्टा

12

00

61

17

देवारापल्ली

यदावोलु

118-6C

00

04

99

118-2B

00

00

12

255/1D

00

02

03

कोय्यालागुडेम

कंकािदर्पुरम

96

00

42

79

कोय्यालागुडेम

राजवाराम

483/2

00

39

33

214

00

53

65

207

01

65

32

515

00

20

93

᳇ारकाितरुमला

आई. एस. राघवापुरम

476/2

00

09

08

474/4

00

02

82

458/3

00

02

84

कामावरपुकोटा

यडाविल्ल

184/1

00

21

80

185/5

00

07

80

कामावरपुकोटा

राम᳖ापालेम

20/19

00

06

21

20/8

00

06

76

20/4

00

08

93

20/3

00

01

30

कामावरपुकोटा

कामावरपुकोटा

653/5

00

03

50

653/4

00

05

82

653/3

00

08

02

653/2

00

04

11

575/1

00

02

23

574/3

00

10

76

574/4

00

01

65

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6607

कामावरपुकोटा

कामावरपुकोटा

53/2

00

08

98

53/1

00

07

41

टी. नरसापुरम

कृष्णारावुपालेम

10/1A

00

18

96

िचतलापूडी

वᱶकमपालेम

75/8A

00

12

08

.

िचतलापूडी

पर्गडावरम

670

00

14

76

575/2B

00

00

06

225/2

00

17

83

224/1

00

06

36

226

00

17

04

227

00

36

23

217/2A

00

04

22

217/1

00

13

56

210/6

00

16

46

159

00

25

91

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)252/2017-ओआर-I/ई-21033]

नोवस िकन् डो, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 5th December, 2018

S.O. 1755.—Whereas, by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural

Gas, published in the Gazette of India No. 948 Part-II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii)dated April 06, 2017 Under S.O.

No.1071(E), 1073(E)& S.O. No. 1074(E) dated 03.04.2017, No. 35 Part-II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii)dated Aug 27-Sept

02, 2017 Under S.O. No. 2028 dated 28.08.2017 and No. 9 Part-II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii) dated February 25- March

03, 2018 vide S.O. Number 371 dated 16.12.2017 issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and

Minerals pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act)

the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land situated in Mandal Polavaram,

Tallapudi, Gopalapuram, Devarapalli, Koyyalagudem, Dwaraka Tirumala, Chintalapudi, T Narsapuram and

Kamavarapukota District West Godavari of Andhra Pradesh State, specified in the schedule appended to that notification

for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of petroleum products from Paradip in the State of Odisha to

Hyderabad in the State of Telangana by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the "Paradip–Hyderabad

Pipeline Project".

And whereas the copies of the Gazette were made available to the public. And whereas the Competent Authority has

under Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, has submitted his report of Central Government.

And whereas, the Central Government after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is

required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of the user therein;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is

hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government

hereby directs that the right of user of the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the Central

Government, vests on the date of publication of the declaration, in India Oil Corporation Limited, free from all

encumbrances.

6608

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

SCHEDULE

District: West Godavari State: Andhra Pradesh

Name of Mandal

Name of Village

Survey No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Square Metre

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

Polavaram

Gutala

828

00

38

15

Tallapudi

Tupakulagudem

172/1B

00

09

06

172/2

00

27

72

188

00

02

21

173/1

00

02

12

Tallapudi

Annadevarapeta

179/3

00

07

90

272/1

00

00

05

263/4A

00

05

25

267/2

00

19

74

267/1

00

24

04

332

00

24

78

360

00

14

74

Gopalapuram

Vellachintalagudem

590-2D

00

05

61

Gopalapuram

Gopalapuram

161

00

16

78

256/3A

00

10

80

Gopalapuram

Komatikunta

61/1C

00

68

33

Gopalapuram

Vadlagunta

12

00

61

17

Devarapalli

Yadavolu

118-6C

00

04

99

118-2B

00

00

12

255/1D

00

02

03

Koyyalagudem

Kankadripuram

96

00

42

79

Koyyalagudem

Rajavaram

483/2

00

39

33

214

00

53

65

207

01

65

32

515

00

20

93

Dwaraka Tirumala

I.S Raghavapuram

476/2

00

09

08

474/4

00

02

82

458/3

00

02

84

Kamavarapukota

Yadavalli

184/1

00

21

80

185/5

00

07

80

Kamavarapukota

Ramannapalem

20/19

00

06

21

20/8

00

06

76

20/4

00

08

93

20/3

00

01

30

Kamavarapukota

Kamavarapukota

653/5

00

03

50

653/4

00

05

82

653/3

00

08

02

653/2

00

04

11

575/1

00

02

23

574/3

00

10

76

574/4

00

01

65

53/2

00

08

98

53/1

00

07

41

T Narasapuram

Krishnaraopalem

10/1A

00

18

96

Chintalapudi

Venkampalem

75/8A

00

12

08

.

Chintalapudi

Pragadavaram

670

00

14

76

575/2B

00

00

06

225/2

00

17

83

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6609

224/1

00

06

36

226

00

17

04

227

00

36

23

217/2A

00

04

22

217/1

00

13

56

210/6

00

16

46

159

00

25

91

[F. No. R-11025(11)252/2017/OR-I/E-21033]

NOAS KINDO, Under Secy.

नई िदल्ली, 5 िदसम् बर, 2018

का. आ. 1756.—केन्दर्ीय सरकार को ऐसा पर्तीत होता है िक लोक िहत मᱶ यह आवश्यक है िक आंधर् पर्देश राज्य मᱶ

पेटर्ोिलयम उत्पादᲂ के पिरवहन के िलए पारादीप-हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन पिरयोजना के िकर्यान्वयन हेतु इंिडयन ऑयल

कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड ᳇ारा पाइपलाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए;

और कᱶदर्ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन िबछाने के पर्योजन के िलए यह आवश्यक पर्तीत होता है िक ऐसी भूमी मᱶ जो इस से

ऊपाब᳍ अनुसूची मᱶ विणत है, और िजसमᱶ उक्त पाइपलाइन िबछाई जाने का पर्स्ताव है, उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न िकया

जाए;

अतः अब, केन्दर्ीय सरकार, पेटर्ोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन्स (भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न) अिधिनयम 1962

(1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1) ᳇ारा पर्दᱫ शिक्तयᲂ का पर्योग करते हुए उस भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार का

अजर्न करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

कोई भी ᳞िक्त, जो उक्त अनुसूची मᱶ विणत भूिम मᱶ िहतब᳍ है, उस तारीख से, िजसको इस अिधसूचना मᱶ युक्त भारत के

राजपतर् की पर्ितयाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हᱹ, इक्कीस (21) िदन के भीतर, भूिम के नीचे पाइपलाइन

िबछाए जाने के िलए उसमᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार के संबन्ध मᱶ शर्ी एम. आर. आर. शेषु, सक्षम पर्ािधकारी (आंधर् पर्देश), इंिडयन

ऑयल कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड (पाइपलाइन्स पर्भाग), पारादीप-हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन पिरयोजना, चौथी मंिजल, एल.आई.सी.

एनेक्सी भवन, िथक्कना (डायमंड पाकर्) रोड़, आर.टी.सी. कॉम्पलेक्स के पास, िवखाशापटनम - 530004, आंधर् पर्देश राज्य को

िलिखत रूप से आक्षेप भेज सकेगा।

अनुसूची

िजला : शर्ीकाकुलम राज्य : आँधर् पर्देश

मंडल का नाम

गर्ाम का नाम

सवᱷ नम्बर

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

टेक्किल

सवरापेटा

79/4

00

00

20

79/12

00

00

35

79/9

00

00

03

75/7

00

03

00

टेक्किल

तेिलनीलापुरम

32/15

00

00

03

32/12

00

00

49

32/11

00

01

39

32/5

00

10

08

37/7

00

00

73

37/1

00

00

02

6610

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

टेक्किल

तेिलनीलापुरम

37/3

00

00

04

42/12

00

05

53

40/9

00

00

05

42/7

00

00

09

41/10b

00

04

95

39/1

00

07

69

टेक्किल

तलागाम

2/6B

00

03

42

1/15A

00

02

57

1/16A

00

01

54

1/16B

00

01

66

5/3

00

00

35

5/12

00

00

10

5/7

00

00

27

6/5

00

00

05

6/4

00

00

29

11/3

00

00

14

16/2

00

01

29

16/3

00

00

03

15/11

00

03

58

160/4

00

00

03

160/6

00

00

02

160/13

00

00

11

212/2

00

00

31

212/14

00

00

12

212/16

00

00

04

212/9

00

00

02

212/17

00

00

26

212/18

00

05

15

176/14

00

00

07

176/10

00

00

02

210/68

00

00

07

210/67

00

00

35

210/65

00

00

39

210/64

00

00

34

210/11

00

00

31

210/12

00

00

71

210/19

00

00

17

210/28P

00

00

21

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6611

टेक्किल

तलागाम

159/13p

00

05

67

210/1B

00

01

83

260

00

06

48

9/5

00

00

01

टेक्किल

संपितरावु रामाकृष्णापुरम

257/1

00

01

45

264/3

00

01

74

264/4

00

00

41

264/8

00

01

67

267/3

00

00

44

268

00

00

60

269

00

00

19

271/1

00

00

10

276

00

00

12

277/6

00

00

69

257/6

00

03

24

265/2P

00

01

42

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)252/2017-ओआर-I/ई-21033]

नोवस िकन् डो, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 5th December, 2018

S.O. 1756.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government, that it is necessary in the public interest that for the

transportation of petroleum products in the state of Andhra Pradesh a pipeline should be laid for implementing Paradip-

Hyderabad Pipeline Project under Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary to

acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which is described in the

Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub Section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals

Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its

intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person who is interested in the land described in the said schedule, may submit objection in writing to Shri. M. R. R.

Seshu, Competent Authority (Andhra Pradesh) Indian Oil Corporation Limited (Pipelines Division), Paradip Hyderabad

Pipeline Project, 4th floor, LIC Annexe Building, Thikkana (Diamond Park) Road, Near RTC Complex, Visakhapatnam -

530004 within twenty one (21) days from the date on which the copies of this notification issued under Sub-section (1)

of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the general public.

SCHEDULE

DISTRICT : SRIKAKULAM

STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH

MANDAL

VILLAGE

SURVEY NO.

AREA

Hectare

Are

Sq. Mt.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

TEKKALI

SAVARAPETA

79/4

00

00

20

79/12

00

00

35

79/9

00

00

03

75/7

00

03

00

6612

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

TEKKALI

TELINILAPURAM

32/15

00

00

03

32/12

00

00

49

32/11

00

01

39

32/5

00

10

08

37/7

00

00

73

37/1

00

00

02

37/3

00

00

04

42/12

00

05

53

40/9

00

00

05

42/7

00

00

09

41/10b

00

04

95

39/1

00

07

69

TEKKALI

TALAGAM

2/6B

00

03

42

1/15A

00

02

57

1/16A

00

01

54

1/16B

00

01

66

5/3

00

00

35

5/12

00

00

10

5/7

00

00

27

6/5

00

00

05

6/4

00

00

29

11/3

00

00

14

16/2

00

01

29

16/3

00

00

03

15/11

00

03

58

160/4

00

00

03

160/6

00

00

02

160/13

00

00

11

212/2

00

00

31

212/14

00

00

12

212/16

00

00

04

212/9

00

00

02

212/17

00

00

26

212/18

00

05

15

176/14

00

00

07

176/10

00

00

02

210/68

00

00

07

210/67

00

00

35

210/65

00

00

39

210/64

00

00

34

210/11

00

00

31

210/12

00

00

71

210/19

00

00

17

210/28P

00

00

21

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6613

[F. No. R-11025(11)252/2017/OR-I/E-21033]

NOAS KINDO, Under Secy.

नई िदल्ली, 5 िदसम् बर, 2018

का. आ. 1757.—केन्दर्ीय सरकार को ऐसा पर्तीत होता है िक लोक िहत मᱶ यह आवश्यक है िक आंधर् पर्देश राज्य मᱶ

पेटर्ोिलयम उत्पादᲂ के पिरवहन के िलए पारादीप- हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन पिरयोजना के िकर्यान्वयन हेतु इंिडयन ऑयल

कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड ᳇ारा पाइपलाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए;

और कᱶदर्ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन िबछाने के पर्योजन के िलए यह आवश्यक पर्तीत होता है िक ऐसी भूमी मᱶ जो इस से

ऊपाब᳍ अनुसूची मᱶ विणत है, और िजसमᱶ उक्त पाइपलाइन िबछाई जाने का पर्स्ताव है, उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न िकया

जाए;

अतः अब, केन्दर्ीय सरकार, पेटर्ोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन्स (भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न) अिधिनयम 1962

(1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1) ᳇ारा पर्दᱫ शिक्तयᲂ का पर्योग करते हुए उस भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार का

अजर्न करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

कोई भी ᳞िक्त, जो उक्त अनुसूची मᱶ विणत भूिम मᱶ िहतब᳍ है, उस तारीख से, िजसको इस अिधसूचना मᱶ युक्त भारत के

राजपतर् की पर्ितयाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हᱹ, इक्कीस (21) िदन के भीतर, भूिम के नीचे पाइपलाइन

िबछाए जाने के िलए उसमᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार के संबन्ध मᱶ शर्ी एम. आर. आर. शेषु, सक्षम पर्ािधकारी (आंधर् पर्देश), इंिडयन

ऑयल कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड (पाइपलाइन्स पर्भाग), पारादीप-हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन पिरयोजना, चौथी मंिजल, एल.आई.सी.

एनेक्सी भवन, िथक्कना (डायमंड पाकर्) रोड़, आर.टी.सी. कॉम्पलेक्स के पास, िवशाशापटनम - 530004, आंधर् पर्देश राज्य को

िलिखत रूप से आक्षेप भेज सकेगा।

अनुसूची

िजला : शर्ीकाकुलम राज्य : आँधर् पर्देश

मंडल का नाम

गर्ाम का नाम

सवᱷ नम्बर

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

संताबोम्मािल

इज्जावरम

4/19

00

00

19

8/2B

00

05

84

TEKKALI

TALAGAM

159/13p

00

05

67

210/1B

00

01

83

260

00

06

48

17/10

00

00

01

TEKKALI

SAMPATIRAO

RAMAKRISHNAPURAM

257/1

00

01

45

264/3

00

01

74

264/4

00

00

41

264/8

00

01

67

267/3

00

00

44

268

00

00

60

269

00

00

19

271/1

00

00

10

276

00

00

12

277/6

00

00

69

257/6

00

03

24

265/2P

00

01

42

6614

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

41/5

00

01

62

38/4

00

01

42

संताबोम्मािल

बृंदावनम

4/10

00

00

07

4/6

00

00

99

4/1

00

00

22

2/9

00

00

01

2/8

00

00

07

2/5

00

00

11

36/6

00

12

95

संताबोम्मािल

अिरकावलासा

83/3

00

01

51

81/2C

00

04

72

79/2

00

05

41

80/1

00

00

47

80/7

00

00

94

67/13

00

01

86

67/11

00

00

05

68/4

00

00

47

69/2

00

04

50

70/14

00

03

97

70/5

00

00

10

70/4

00

00

30

43/7A

00

0

11

43/4

00

01

27

43/1

00

01

25

30/9D

00

01

58

30/7

00

01

00

30/5

00

01

88

29/3

00

00

39

16/8

00

00

72

16/7

00

00

86

16/9

00

00

73

16/5

00

01

80

5/6

00

00

48

5/4

00

00

68

5/3

00

00

11

16/13

00

09

21

17/7P

00

01

22

16/14

00

02

23

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6615

संताबोम्मािल

दंडुगोपालापुरम

1/1

00

05

60

संताबोम्मािल

िच᳖ातुंगाम

9/2

00

00

68

9/4

00

00

16

11/9

00

00

83

11/7

00

00

44

12/9

00

00

15

12/8A

00

00

63

12/8B

00

00

23

14/4

00

00

03

14/7

00

00

07

43/1

00

00

34

9/5

00

00

01

संताबोम्मािल

पे᳎ातुंगाम

36/3

00

00

90

39/8

00

00

05

38/4

00

00

44

51

00

00

35

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)252/2017-ओ.आर-I/ई-21033]

नोवस िकन् डो, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 5th December, 2018

S.O. 1757.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government, that it is necessary in the public interest that for the

transportation of petroleum products in the state of Andhra Pradesh a pipeline should be laid for implementing Paradip-

Hyderabad Pipeline Project under Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary to

acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which is described in the

Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub Section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals

Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its

intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person who is interested in the land described in the said schedule, may submit objection in writing to Shri. M. R. R.

Seshu, Competent Authority (Andhra Pradesh) Indian Oil Corporation Limited (Pipelines Division), Paradip Hyderabad

Pipeline Project, 4th floor, LIC Annexe Building, Thikkana (Diamond Park) Road, Near RTC Complex, Visakhapatnam -

530004 within twenty one (21) days from the date on which the copies of this notification issued under Sub-section (1)

of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the general public.

SCHEDULE

DISTRICT : SRIKAKULAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH

MANDAL

VILLAGE

SURVEY

NO.

AREA

Hectare

Are

Sq.

Mt.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

SANTA BOMMALI

IJJAVARAM

4/19

00

00

19

8/2B

00

05

84

41/5

00

01

62

38/4

00

01

42

6616

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

SANTA BOMMALI

BRUNDAVANAM

4/10

00

00

07

4/6

00

00

99

4/1

00

00

22

2/9

00

00

01

2/8

00

00

07

2/5

00

00

11

36/6

00

12

95

SANTA BOMMALI

ARIKAVALASA

83/3

00

01

51

81/2C

00

04

72

79/2

00

05

41

80/1

00

00

47

80/7

00

00

94

67/13

00

01

86

67/11

00

00

05

68/4

00

00

47

69/2

00

04

50

70/14

00

03

97

70/5

00

00

10

70/4

00

00

30

43/7A

00

0

11

43/4

00

01

27

43/1

00

01

25

30/9D

00

01

58

30/7

00

01

00

30/5

00

01

88

29/3

00

00

39

16/8

00

00

72

16/7

00

00

86

16/9

00

00

73

16/5

00

01

80

5/6

00

00

48

5/4

00

00

68

5/3

00

00

11

16/13

00

09

21

17/7P

00

01

22

16/14

00

02

23

SANTA BOMMALI

DANDUGOPALAPURAM

1/1

00

05

60

SANTA BOMMALI

CHINNA TUNGAM

9/2

00

00

68

9/4

00

00

16

11/9

00

00

83

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6617

11/7

00

00

44

12/9

00

00

15

12/8A

00

00

63

12/8B

00

00

23

14/4

00

00

03

14/7

00

00

07

43/1

00

00

34

9/5

00

00

01

SANTA BOMMALI

PEDDATUNGAM

36/3

00

00

90

39/8

00

00

05

38/4

00

00

44

51

00

00

35

[F. No. R-11025(11)252/2017/OR-I/E-21033]

NOAS KINDO, Under Secy.

नई िदल्ली, 6 िदसम् बर, 2018

का. आ. 1758.—केन्दर्ीय सरकार ने पेटर्ोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न)

अिधिनयम, 1962 (1962 का 50) (िजसे इसमᱶ इसके प᳟ात उक्त अिधिनयम कहा गया है) की धारा 3 उप धारा (1) के

अधीन जारी की गई, भारत सरकार के पेटर्ोिलयम और पर्ाकृितक गैस मंतर्ालय की अिधसूचना का.आ. 2102 तारीख

07.09.2017 िजसका पर्काशन भारत के राजपतर् संख्या 36, भाग II, खण्ड 3, उप खण्ड (ii) तारीख 09.09.2017 मᱶ िकया

गया है। इस अिधसूचना मᱶ संलग्न अनुसूची मᱶ िविनिद᳥ आंधर्पर्देश राज्य के िजला िवजयानगरम के मंडल :गुलार्, गिरिविड़,

कोतावलासा एवं चीपुरुपिल्ल की भूिम मᱶ, ओडीशा राज्य मᱶ पारादीप से तेलंगाना राज्य मᱶ हैदराबाद तक पेटर्ोिलयम उत्पादᲂ

के पिरवहन के िलए इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपᱷरेशन िलिमटेड के ᳇ारा िकर्यािन्वत िकए जा रहे “पारादीप-हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन

पिरयोजना” के संबंध मᱶ पाइपलाइन िबछाने के पर्योजन के िलए उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न करने के िलए अपने आशय की

घोषणा की थी:

और उक्त राजपतर् अिधसूचना की पर्ितयाँ जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थᱭ।और उक्त अिधिनयम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1)

के अनुसरण मᱶ सक्षम पर्ािधकारी नᱶ केन्दर्ीय सरकार को अपनी िरपोटर् दे दी है।

और केन्दर्ीय सरकार ने उक्त िरपोटर् पर िवचार करने के प᳟ात और यह समाधान हो जाने पर िक उक्त भूिम पाइपलाइन

िबछाने के िलए अपेिक्षत है, उसमᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न करने का िविनश् चय िकया है:

अतः अब, केन्दर्ीय सरकार उक्त अिधिनयम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1) ᳇ारा पर्दᱫ शिक्तयᲂ का पर्योग करते हुए एतद् ᳇ारा

घोषणा करती है िक इस अिधसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूिच मᱶ िविनिद᳥ भूिम मᱶ पाइपलाइन िबछाने के उपयोग का अिधकार

अिजत िकया जाए:

और केन्दर्ीय सरकार उक्त अिधिनयम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) ᳇ारा पर्दᱫ शिक्तयᲂ का पर्योग करते हुए, यह िनदᱷश देती है

िक उक्त भूिम मᱶ उपयोग का अिधकार इस घोषणा के पर्काशन की तारीख से केन्दर्ीय सरकार मᱶ िनिहत होने के बजाए सभी

िबल्लंगमᲂ से मुक्त होकर इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपᱷरेशन िलिमटेड मᱶ िनिहत होगा

अनुसूची

िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश

मंडल का नाम

गर्ाम का नाम

सवᱷ नम्बर

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

चीपुरुपिल्ल

पिᱫकायावलासा

197/17

00

00

12

202/8

00

00

34

6618

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश

मंडल का नाम

गर्ाम का नाम

सवᱷ नम्बर

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

चीपुरुपिल्ल

पिᱫकायावलासा

202/9

00

01

34

173/8

00

07

05

173/7

00

05

67

173/9

00

04

71

173/6

00

00

49

173/5

00

07

43

170/17

00

04

01

170/16

00

00

88

170/18

00

05

49

170/19

00

05

25

170/20

00

02

27

170/22

00

01

07

170/21

00

03

85

170/7

00

02

11

170/6

00

02

10

170/5

00

03

80

170/4

00

03

05

167/18

00

00

14

167/17

00

03

11

167/12

00

00

10

167/11

00

01

47

167/10

00

03

43

167/7

00

05

87

167/3

00

00

10

167/6

00

04

31

167/5

00

05

76

166/3

00

04

25

चीपुरुपिल्ल

पेदानिड़पिल्ल

95/3

00

09

45

95/2

00

03

24

95/1

00

27

85

86/2

00

30

43

87/10

00

01

05

87/11

00

00

73

87/9

00

06

87

87/13

00

01

00

87/14

00

03

40

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6619

िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश

मंडल का नाम

गर्ाम का नाम

सवᱷ नम्बर

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

चीपुरुपिल्ल

पेदानिड़पिल्ल

87/15

00

03

30

87/16

00

04

31

87/17

00

04

45

87/18

00

00

72

53/1

00

00

36

53/9

00

03

94

53/11

00

15

53

53/10

00

05

42

55/1

00

02

12

53/5

00

08

64

55/3

00

06

74

55/7

00

04

18

55/6

00

01

13

55/8

00

05

26

55/10

00

07

30

55/9

00

00

10

56/1

00

00

60

56/2

00

14

44

56/3

00

02

70

57

00

02

70

69/1

00

06

04

69/2

00

14

47

69/3

00

03

42

69/5

00

03

04

69/6

00

03

69

69/9

00

01

53

71/6

00

08

11

71/3

00

08

50

72/2

00

13

72

72/1

00

02

43

72/4

00

11

53

72/8

00

00

10

72/7

00

08

68

73/6

00

02

91

73/5

00

09

94

73/4

00

10

17

6620

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश

मंडल का नाम

गर्ाम का नाम

सवᱷ नम्बर

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

73/3

00

01

99

चीपुरुपिल्ल

िचनानिड़पिल्ल

43/1

00

05

58

42/2

00

01

62

42/7

00

04

68

42/9

00

07

77

42/10

00

08

90

42/13

00

02

37

42/12

00

05

18

42/11

00

00

10

39

00

16

83

38/1

00

05

91

38/5

00

00

10

18/10

00

00

10

18/11

00

01

22

18/14

00

04

93

18/15

00

00

10

18/13

00

01

45

18/16

00

06

66

19/15

00

00

17

19/16

00

01

13

19/20

00

02

39

19/21

00

02

22

19/22

00

03

70

19/23

00

01

64

19/28

00

00

77

19/27

00

02

99

19/29

00

00

26

19/30

00

01

42

19/31

00

00

53

19/26

00

02

43

20/2

00

00

18

21/6

00

03

86

21/7

00

04

04

21/8

00

00

22

21/10

00

02

47

21/11

00

00

41

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6621

िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश

मंडल का नाम

गर्ाम का नाम

सवᱷ नम्बर

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

चीपुरुपिल्ल

िचनानिड़पिल्ल

21/15

00

02

71

21/12

00

00

36

21/16

00

00

32

21/17

00

13

86

21/21

00

00

34

21/20

00

00

10

7/15

00

00

75

25/1

00

07

96

26/3

00

11

24

26/2

00

28

92

26/1

00

03

33

27/1

00

10

96

27/2

00

04

07

27/9

00

01

40

27/8

00

00

10

चीपुरुपिल्ल

इटाकलार्पिल्ल

168/18

00

09

28

168/22

00

00

13

168/23

00

03

66

168/30

00

01

45

168/31

00

00

10

168/27

00

03

99

168/26

00

00

88

168/28

00

00

60

168/24

00

03

61

168/25

00

00

10

168/10

00

10

92

169/7

00

00

36

169/6

00

02

36

169/2

00

05

74

169/3

00

01

05

169/4

00

00

26

169/1

00

01

99

166/14

00

01

39

166/13

00

02

89

166/15

00

00

81

166/16

00

05

93

6622

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश

मंडल का नाम

गर्ाम का नाम

सवᱷ नम्बर

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

चीपुरुपिल्ल

इटाकलार्पिल्ल

166/4

00

00

10

166/3

00

02

45

166/2

00

01

51

166/17

00

01

58

166/1

00

00

22

166/18

00

04

10

165/14

00

02

07

165/15

00

02

64

165/16

00

02

19

165/17

00

02

30

165/6

00

07

09

165/5

00

02

32

165/18

00

00

10

165/19

00

04

34

165/20

00

04

40

165/22

00

01

24

164/24

00

06

61

164/21

00

03

17

164/20

00

02

88

164/19

00

03

04

164/18

00

03

08

164/16

00

08

04

156/26

00

16

66

156/23

00

03

63

156/22

00

01

32

156/25

00

05

19

156/13

00

06

94

156/12

00

15

08

156/11

00

00

50

155/45

00

04

33

155/23

00

02

19

155/17

00

03

27

155/16

00

02

05

155/14

00

01

62

154/7

00

00

32

154/6

00

02

54

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6623

िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश

मंडल का नाम

गर्ाम का नाम

सवᱷ नम्बर

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

चीपुरुपिल्ल

इटाकलार्पिल्ल

154/5

00

03

77

154/3

00

03

05

154/2

00

04

23

154/1

00

04

28

153/20

00

00

10

153/19

00

01

13

153/18

00

02

50

153/17

00

02

24

153/16

00

02

71

152/3

00

11

94

150/13

00

07

19

150/6

00

11

04

150/7

00

01

82

177/3

00

06

19

177/2

00

16

64

177/1

00

07

88

178/1

00

03

90

176/3

00

11

17

176/2

00

07

61

176/1

00

22

51

147/3

00

34

43

चीपुरुपिल्ल

पोतायावलसा

78/4

00

19

96

78/3

00

21

48

76/2

00

21

85

76/1

00

02

34

70/4

00

08

66

72/2

00

22

74

72/3

00

03

36

72/4

00

04

13

चीपुरुपिल्ल

पलार्

154/15

00

29

21

155/6

00

01

65

163/2

00

04

50

162/23

00

00

77

162/22

00

00

43

162/19

00

00

67

162/18

00

00

95

6624

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश

मंडल का नाम

गर्ाम का नाम

सवᱷ नम्बर

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

चीपुरुपिल्ल

पलार्

161/17

00

01

48

161/16

00

03

05

162/14

00

01

26

162/13

00

00

81

161/9

00

01

45

162/10

00

00

86

162/9

00

01

11

161/8

00

00

77

161/5

00

02

55

161/4

00

02

71

161/2

00

00

79

161/1

00

07

54

160/19

00

01

20

160/20

00

01

17

160/21

00

00

97

160/14

00

00

79

160/15

00

02

25

160/9

00

01

19

160/10

00

01

11

160/5

00

01

83

160/3

00

00

53

160/4

00

02

78

100/28

00

00

91

100/26

00

00

92

184/2

00

03

83

184/1

00

03

78

185/15

00

02

00

185/16

00

03

05

185/13

00

00

32

185/12

00

04

98

185/11

00

05

96

185/4

00

03

07

185/3

00

00

93

185/2

00

00

82

185/1

00

01

08

189/18

00

00

50

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6625

िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश

मंडल का नाम

गर्ाम का नाम

सवᱷ नम्बर

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

चीपुरुपिल्ल

पलार्

186

00

06

59

189/12

00

05

75

188/2

00

02

86

188/5

00

00

38

188/7

00

00

65

188/8

00

00

48

188/9

00

00

77

188/1

00

05

42

189/11

00

00

86

191/17

00

05

08

191/16

00

00

64

191/14

00

01

55

191/13

00

02

29

191/12

00

01

15

191/3

00

08

02

192/19

00

02

17

192/8

00

04

37

192/18

00

00

53

192/17

00

01

19

192/11

00

02

97

192/12

00

01

93

192/10

00

03

28

192/4

00

00

10

192/3

00

00

12

192/2

00

00

88

192/13

00

01

71

192/1

00

01

94

193/3

00

00

16

193/2

00

00

96

193/1

00

00

64

78/15

00

00

10

गिरिविड़

दुम्मेदा

179/16

00

03

48

179/12

00

07

06

179/13

00

00

13

179/10

00

01

21

175/19

00

05

63

6626

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश

मंडल का नाम

गर्ाम का नाम

सवᱷ नम्बर

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

गिरिविड़

दुम्मेदा

176/10

00

01

57

176/9

00

04

04

176/8

00

04

72

176/7

00

02

67

176/6

00

09

87

176/4

00

13

10

60

00

03

47

176/3

00

15

67

165/4

00

10

39

165/5

00

02

40

165/2

00

00

12

165/6

00

02

05

165/7

00

14

22

165/12

00

04

79

165/13

00

00

10

164/25

00

02

67

164/31

00

04

86

164/30

00

06

53

164/29

00

02

96

164/11

00

00

26

163/5

00

00

26

163/4

00

07

79

163/2

00

00

10

163/3

00

00

79

69/16

00

04

20

70/1

00

15

02

70/5

00

04

29

70/9

00

00

62

70/6

00

00

10

68/1

00

00

94

67/7

00

02

32

67/6

00

11

85

66/6

00

01

18

66/3

00

02

99

66/1

00

07

80

66/4

00

01

68

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6627

िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश

मंडल का नाम

गर्ाम का नाम

सवᱷ नम्बर

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

गिरिविड़

दुम्मेदा

85/5

00

00

51

85/2

00

09

16

85/3

00

00

66

85/7

00

07

56

85/9

00

01

49

85/10

00

00

20

85/8

00

04

61

85/11

00

08

14

85/13

00

02

01

95/16

01

02

28

95/15

00

02

32

95/14

00

04

52

95/17

00

01

10

96/2

00

06

85

96/3

00

02

13

96/4

00

00

18

96/8

00

04

27

96/7

00

00

10

96/9

00

05

67

96/14

00

00

58

96/13

00

05

57

96/12

00

00

22

96/19

00

09

01

97/1

00

05

75

97/2

00

05

20

97/3

00

10

34

101/11

00

02

82

101/35

00

14

13

101/36

00

02

09

101/28

00

00

82

101/29

00

00

10

101/27

00

02

57

101/26

00

01

94

101/24

00

04

15

101/23

00

02

16

100/20

00

02

56

6628

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश

मंडल का नाम

गर्ाम का नाम

सवᱷ नम्बर

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

गिरिविड़

दुम्मेदा

100/19

00

00

14

100/7

00

00

25

100/8

00

03

84

100/9

00

03

99

100/11

00

00

16

100/12

00

02

87

107/27

00

02

63

100/13

00

02

07

107/28

00

02

47

107/29

00

01

39

107/18

00

00

52

107/15

00

02

89

107/16

00

01

77

107/13

00

02

00

107/12

00

03

64

107/11

00

02

84

130/19

00

00

10

107/9

00

00

95

130/14

00

10

58

107/4

00

01

78

107/3

00

05

34

129/1

00

00

10

108

00

24

54

127/2

00

04

64

127/3

00

04

74

गुलार्

सदानंदापुरम

73/8

00

00

88

73/5

00

01

10

गुलार्

नगल्लावलसा

86/15

00

00

10

87/20

00

06

21

87/22

00

00

40

87/21

00

01

65

87/18

00

06

63

87/19

00

00

30

87/16

00

00

36

87/25

00

00

84

87/17

00

05

98

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6629

िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश

मंडल का नाम

गर्ाम का नाम

सवᱷ नम्बर

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

गुलार्

नगल्लावलसा

87/2

00

03

25

84/29

00

02

26

84/31

00

00

59

84/30

00

00

70

84/27

00

00

27

84/28

00

05

29

84/25

00

02

85

84/24

00

00

10

82/1

00

05

54

83/2

00

21

51

83/5

00

01

26

83/4

00

01

93

83/3

00

01

39

56

00

06

00

54/13

00

08

77

54/12

00

00

35

55/11

00

01

30

55/10

00

13

20

55/9

00

00

94

55/8

00

10

00

55/12

00

01

67

55/13

00

00

24

43

00

03

37

42/10

00

23

10

42/6

00

01

30

42/5

00

01

87

41/14

00

04

24

41/12

00

02

57

41/11

00

02

26

41/6

00

02

38

41/1

00

02

69

40/28

00

04

02

40/23

00

02

35

40/16

00

01

27

40/15

00

00

90

40/9

00

01

45

6630

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश

मंडल का नाम

गर्ाम का नाम

सवᱷ नम्बर

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

गुलार्

नगल्लावलसा

40/8

00

00

43

39/11

00

00

17

39/8

00

00

10

39/12

00

05

04

39/22

00

00

45

39/23

00

00

53

39/13

00

01

80

39/14

00

00

19

39/5

00

02

66

39/4

00

00

19

39/3

00

01

59

37/24

00

05

31

37/15

00

04

94

37/14

00

02

82

37/13

00

02

65

37/6

00

02

81

37/5

00

01

24

62/2

00

00

10

62/1

00

02

45

34/19

00

00

46

34/15

00

00

78

34/13

00

01

10

34/10

00

00

55

34/9

00

00

10

65/11

00

03

21

65/1

00

06

15

65/9

00

03

50

65/8

00

00

55

65/7

00

08

21

65/2

00

04

74

65/6

00

02

31

65/3

00

02

80

29/1

00

03

02

29/10

00

01

14

29/11

00

04

34

29/12

00

03

94

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6631

िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश

मंडल का नाम

गर्ाम का नाम

सवᱷ नम्बर

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

गुलार्

नगल्लावलसा

29/13

00

01

40

29/15

00

04

50

29/16

00

05

26

29/18

00

07

84

29/17

00

00

49

66/2

00

02

76

66/3

00

01

75

66/4

00

00

10

66/1

00

00

91

गुलार्

जम्मु

88/11

00

12

18

90/3

00

08

63

90/4

00

00

30

90/2

00

04

74

90/7

00

07

54

90/6

00

01

08

93/21

00

06

59

93/22

00

02

74

93/12

00

03

58

93/24

00

07

63

93/13

00

00

12

93/9

00

01

03

93/11

00

02

72

93/10

00

04

18

93/7

00

00

74

93/5

00

04

89

93/6

00

00

10

95/20

00

00

10

95/21

00

01

81

95/22

00

06

45

95/24

00

04

04

95/23

00

00

81

97/23

00

00

10

97/22

00

04

73

97/12

00

03

53

97/21

00

00

56

97/11

00

01

39

6632

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश

मंडल का नाम

गर्ाम का नाम

सवᱷ नम्बर

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

गुलार्

जम् मू

97/13

00

01

34

97/10

00

00

10

97/14

00

05

00

97/15

00

01

19

97/7

00

03

67

97/6

00

05

08

97/3

00

03

33

97/2

00

00

54

275/3

00

00

27

275/2

00

01

38

275/1

00

06

12

275/10

00

00

93

270/22

00

00

22

270/23

00

02

83

270/26

00

01

40

270/24

00

00

10

270/27

00

01

96

270/28

00

05

52

270/25

00

00

69

270/10

00

01

73

269/12

00

04

96

269/11

00

01

05

269/14

00

00

32

269/10

00

04

62

269/9

00

04

08

269/8

00

00

30

269/5

00

01

86

269/7

00

01

52

296/6

00

01

15

269/4

00

00

10

268/4

00

02

20

268/3

00

02

79

268/2

00

04

22

268/1

00

04

40

101/13

00

07

57

113/2

00

09

84

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6633

िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश

मंडल का नाम

गर्ाम का नाम

सवᱷ नम्बर

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

गुलार्

जम् मू

112/5

00

00

68

112/8

00

07

47

112/10

00

08

40

112/9

00

03

09

111/2

00

00

10

111/1

00

05

56

111/3

00

01

84

109/3

00

00

10

109/5

00

00

50

109/13

00

01

07

109/12

00

03

09

109/11

00

01

61

109/10

00

01

10

110/1

00

01

83

108/14

00

01

08

108/15

00

03

20

108/18

00

00

28

108/19

00

02

80

108/12

00

00

10

108/13

00

00

90

108/20

00

04

17

108/23

00

03

41

108/24

00

08

79

108/25

00

01

39

107/35

00

04

59

117/2

00

16

18

117/1

00

10

16

119/1

00

08

59

118/9

00

01

13

118/2

00

06

05

126/36

00

03

37

126/35

00

02

25

126/34

00

02

70

126/9

00

02

74

126/8

00

00

10

123/6

00

00

10

6634

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश

मंडल का नाम

गर्ाम का नाम

सवᱷ नम्बर

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

गुलार्

जम् मू

123/5

00

00

68

123/1

00

06

69

123/2

00

00

10

125

00

05

30

151/11

00

01

50

151/14

00

02

00

151/15

00

00

40

151/12

00

02

55

151/10

00

01

70

151/6

00

08

40

152/8

00

02

23

152/1

00

00

10

182/25

00

00

10

182/26

00

05

26

182/27

00

00

45

182/18

00

00

35

182/19

00

02

05

182/17

00

02

27

182/11

00

01

00

182/9

00

00

10

182/10

00

02

00

182/12

00

02

71

182/13

00

00

41

183/19

00

00

72

183/18

00

00

38

183/17

00

00

10

183/20

00

02

48

183/21

00

04

95

183/24

00

00

36

183/22

00

01

39

183/23

00

00

22

183/7

00

00

92

183/6

00

01

95

183/5

00

01

33

183/4

00

01

72

183/3

00

01

55

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6635

िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश

मंडल का नाम

गर्ाम का नाम

सवᱷ नम्बर

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

गुलार्

जम् मू

183/2

00

06

47

179/12

00

01

14

179/13

00

04

71

179/11

00

02

55

179/10

00

02

37

179/2

00

02

35

179/1

00

02

94

178/24

00

01

52

178/23

00

01

44

178/22

00

01

62

178/4

00

00

10

178/3

00

04

29

178/2

00

00

52

178/1

00

02

19

176/31

00

00

10

176/30

00

10

89

176/1

00

05

82

175/23

00

00

15

175/20

00

06

34

175/19

00

01

90

197/19

00

06

76

197/20

00

04

79

197/30

00

00

89

197/29

00

00

69

197/28

00

00

73

197/27

00

00

28

197/26

00

00

39

197/25

00

00

36

197/24

00

00

25

197/23

00

03

85

196/19

00

14

35

196/25

00

09

19

196/20

00

00

66

196/21

00

01

55

196/24

00

00

20

196/23

00

00

35

6636

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश

मंडल का नाम

गर्ाम का नाम

सवᱷ नम्बर

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

गुलार्

जम् मू

196/22

00

00

54

209/2

00

01

99

211/19

00

01

71

211/18

00

00

40

211/7

00

13

43

211/17

00

00

16

211/6

00

00

10

211/8

00

00

19

211/16

00

00

10

211/10

00

02

51

211/9

00

02

22

211/11

00

02

81

211/12

00

02

57

211/15

00

00

30

211/14

00

00

61

211/13

00

02

15

216/4

00

04

95

216/3

00

00

14

214/12

00

00

10

214/11

00

00

65

214/10

00

01

03

214/9

00

04

80

214/7

00

00

28

214/8

00

07

49

गुलार्

गिरड़ा

99/23

00

02

04

99/24

00

02

68

99/25

00

01

33

99/26

00

03

58

99/17

00

01

92

99/27

00

02

53

99/28

00

02

43

99/29

00

02

43

99/15

00

01

92

99/14

00

04

31

99/13

00

00

11

99/1

00

07

92

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6637

िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश

मंडल का नाम

गर्ाम का नाम

सवᱷ नम्बर

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

गुलार्

गिरड़ा

76/6

00

05

45

76/7

00

00

55

76/9

00

15

63

75/14

00

01

83

75/12

00

03

61

75/13

00

00

62

75/11

00

05

60

75/1

00

00

16

79/15

00

00

10

79/14

00

02

06

79/12

00

01

94

79/11

00

00

10

80/20

00

06

96

80/18

00

00

32

80/12

00

02

90

80/13

00

03

31

80/5

00

02

65

80/4

00

05

34

80/2

00

01

05

31/8

00

02

10

31/7

00

00

93

32/19

00

00

10

32/18

00

01

46

32/17

00

02

45

32/16

00

01

32

30/20

00

00

60

30/19

00

00

10

30/16

00

02

65

30/15

00

02

68

30/14

00

00

10

30/6

00

01

19

30/7

00

09

41

30/5

00

01

26

30/4

00

02

33

30/3

00

00

85

34/34

00

00

98

6638

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश

मंडल का नाम

गर्ाम का नाम

सवᱷ नम्बर

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

गुलार्

गिरड़ा

34/32

00

01

73

34/31

00

01

74

34/23

00

02

10

34/22

00

00

20

34/24

00

01

59

34/25

00

00

10

34/14

00

00

73

34/15

00

01

15

34/16

00

00

19

34/9

00

01

53

34/8

00

01

31

34/4

00

03

33

34/2

00

01

68

34/3

00

00

21

35/2

00

00

10

35/5

00

00

54

35/6

00

00

81

35/8

00

01

09

35/7

00

00

21

35/9

00

00

66

35/10

00

00

56

35/11

00

00

49

35/12

00

02

35

35/13

00

01

41

35/14

00

00

48

35/17

00

00

10

35/32

00

02

49

35/34

00

01

81

35/35

00

00

35

35/31

00

00

10

12/12

00

00

30

12/13

00

00

10

12/11

00

01

77

12/10

00

02

80

12/9

00

02

59

12/7

00

03

92

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6639

िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश

मंडल का नाम

गर्ाम का नाम

सवᱷ नम्बर

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

गुलार्

गिरड़ा

12/6

00

03

00

12/5

00

05

66

7/10

00

04

82

7/9

00

04

37

7/24

00

01

46

7/23

00

00

99

7/22

00

00

32

7/21

00

00

14

7/20

00

00

25

7/19

00

00

62

7/11

00

06

94

7/12

00

02

64

7/13

00

05

21

7/14

00

00

10

7/15

00

00

10

6/19

00

06

93

6/20

00

05

10

6/21

00

05

05

6/22

00

05

44

6/23

00

05

47

6/24

00

02

81

3/3

00

01

92

3/9

00

00

20

3/8

00

01

55

3/7

00

02

99

3/6

00

07

20

3/5

00

02

80

3/11

00

04

00

3/12

00

00

10

2/8

00

08

95

2/4

00

07

65

2/5

00

06

16

2/6

00

01

12

2/12

00

00

10

2/13

00

11

70

गुलार्

गोलार्पेटाजग᳖ाधपुरम

23/2

00

01

62

6640

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश

मंडल का नाम

गर्ाम का नाम

सवᱷ नम्बर

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

गुलार्

गोलार्पेटाजग᳖ाधपुरम

23/21

00

03

87

23/20

00

00

58

23/18

00

01

14

23/17

00

02

76

23/16

00

04

17

23/10

00

02

20

23/13

00

01

19

23/12

00

02

29

23/11

00

02

10

23/9

00

01

11

22/12

00

08

39

22/26

00

00

18

22/25

00

00

73

22/13

00

02

67

22/24

00

02

60

22/23

00

03

65

22/18

00

05

75

18/21

00

00

19

18/23

00

00

40

18/22

00

03

34

13/13

00

03

81

14/8

00

02

90

14/7

00

05

42

14/6

00

07

63

14/3

00

08

11

14/2

00

10

31

14/1

00

00

59

15/1

00

07

77

11/16

00

02

57

11/15

00

21

61

11/14

00

00

10

गुलार्

केल्ला

34/1

00

03

30

33/2

00

30

05

7

00

41

17

8/18

00

02

52

8/21

00

19

06

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6641

िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश

मंडल का नाम

गर्ाम का नाम

सवᱷ नम्बर

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

गुलार्

केल्ला

8/25

00

08

32

8/24

00

00

87

8/20

00

06

85

8/19

00

00

29

13/23

00

00

20

13/22

00

08

90

13/21

00

00

57

13/20

00

04

87

13/17

00

09

30

13/16

00

03

39

13/15

00

05

38

13/1

00

04

38

13/2

00

00

10

347/20

00

05

56

346/2

00

07

69

346/1

00

00

45

346/3

00

11

01

346/4

00

11

90

346/7

00

00

65

346/6

00

01

72

346/5

00

06

57

346/8

00

01

20

14/10

00

06

47

14/9

00

00

10

गुलार्

गोषाड़ा

24/16

00

00

10

24/17

00

08

46

24/18

00

04

21

24/20

00

00

86

24/19

00

06

71

24/8

00

02

96

24/9

00

04

49

24/10

00

02

36

25/1

00

01

38

21/14

00

03

00

21/10

00

07

07

21/9

00

01

42

6642

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश

मंडल का नाम

गर्ाम का नाम

सवᱷ नम्बर

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

गुलार्

गोषाड़ा

21/8

00

00

10

21/5

00

01

98

21/6

00

02

00

21/1

00

04

91

20/12

00

03

88

20/10

00

04

42

20/9

00

01

37

20/5

00

03

39

19/2

00

05

61

19/1

00

13

54

19/4

00

00

56

16/1

00

07

51

16/5

00

03

28

16/3

00

06

70

16/4

00

00

10

15/6

00

05

30

15/5

00

01

83

15/3

00

00

15

15/8

00

07

34

15/9

00

04

40

15/15

00

00

25

15/14

00

01

49

15/12

00

00

89

57/5

00

03

16

57/6

00

03

40

57/7

00

03

56

57/10

00

01

50

57/12

00

04

04

57/9

00

01

27

57/13

00

05

05

57/14

00

00

29

64/2

00

01

28

64/5

00

05

23

64/8

00

05

46

65/1

00

10

72

65/2

00

11

90

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6643

िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश

मंडल का नाम

गर्ाम का नाम

सवᱷ नम्बर

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

गुलार्

गोषाड़ा

66/3

00

04

68

66/2

00

00

10

66/4

00

02

67

66/5

00

04

73

66/6

00

04

15

66/17

00

00

90

66/16

00

04

67

66/15

00

00

90

66/13

00

01

73

68/9

00

03

08

68/8

00

03

93

68/7

00

06

76

68/4

00

03

53

68/3

00

06

31

68/5

00

00

39

68/6

00

00

92

69/1

00

01

79

गुलार्

कलवाचेलार्

60/6

00

00

46

60/7

00

01

87

60/8

00

02

83

60/11

00

02

42

60/9

00

01

13

60/3

00

00

17

60/10

00

01

22

62/4

00

00

10

62/5

00

02

82

62/6

00

01

46

62/7

00

00

95

62/8

00

03

56

62/9

00

01

85

29/14

00

03

99

29/15

00

04

53

29/13

00

00

81

29/12

00

00

55

29/11

00

00

54

29/16

00

02

83

6644

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश

मंडल का नाम

गर्ाम का नाम

सवᱷ नम्बर

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

गुलार्

कलवाचेलार्

29/17

00

00

10

29/10

00

02

71

29/32

00

00

10

29/9

00

02

55

29/8

00

04

96

29/3

00

04

22

29/33

00

00

10

29/2

00

02

68

29/1

00

02

94

30/21

00

00

60

30/20

00

01

00

30/19

00

01

04

30/18

00

01

71

30/14

00

00

38

30/17

00

02

91

30/16

00

03

14

30/15

00

03

10

30/6

00

03

63

30/4

00

03

49

30/3

00

01

54

28/2

00

01

66

28/1

00

04

22

32/8

00

02

90

32/7

00

00

23

32/9

00

01

54

32/10

00

01

94

32/11

00

02

24

32/12

00

00

10

32/6

00

02

77

32/5

00

00

45

32/3

00

02

79

32/2

00

04

43

34/14

00

00

59

34/10

00

00

58

34/9

00

02

38

34/8

00

01

36

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6645

िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश

मंडल का नाम

गर्ाम का नाम

सवᱷ नम्बर

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

गुलार्

कलवाचेलार्

34/7

00

01

60

34/2

00

02

06

34/1

00

04

34

37/7

00

05

21

37/4

00

05

61

37/9

00

00

30

37/10

00

00

35

37/11

00

00

44

37/2

00

00

10

37/3

00

04

34

37/12

00

04

24

38

00

03

55

39/6

00

00

47

39/7

00

02

24

39/5

00

08

87

39/8

00

00

10

39/3

00

00

29

39/10

00

06

27

39/11

00

02

64

39/13

00

00

54

39/12

00

04

73

2/10

00

00

36

1/3

00

20

37

2/6

00

03

85

2/7

00

05

89

गुलार्

कोटागंडर्ेड़ु

92/3

00

10

90

86/1

00

00

42

63/8

00

03

62

63/9

00

00

31

64/22

00

00

32

64/21

00

01

49

64/20

00

04

57

64/15

00

15

90

64/5

00

00

39

64/3

00

02

62

64/2

00

00

26

6646

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश

मंडल का नाम

गर्ाम का नाम

सवᱷ नम्बर

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

गुलार्

कोटागंडर्ेड़ु

65/5

00

08

61

48/16

00

12

10

48/17

00

03

74

48/3

00

00

69

48/1

00

05

73

31/30

00

04

32

31/23

00

06

01

31/12

00

01

80

31/11

00

03

52

31/25

00

00

17

31/9

00

00

12

31/10

00

01

09

31/4

00

01

91

31/3

00

01

28

31/2

00

00

10

34/4

00

03

09

34/5

00

00

97

34/6

00

03

01

34/3

00

02

59

34/2

00

02

76

34/1

00

10

80

गुलार्

आनंदपुरम एंड िबट

194/2

00

07

78

194/3

00

00

83

194/4

00

00

68

194/5

00

00

81

194/6

00

01

48

194/1

00

03

35

195/5

00

00

67

195/4

00

00

82

195/3

00

00

34

195/6

00

01

32

195/7

00

02

51

195/2

00

00

25

195/10

00

17

62

195/9

00

00

10

195/11

00

00

47

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6647

िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश

मंडल का नाम

गर्ाम का नाम

सवᱷ नम्बर

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

गुलार्

आनंदपुरम एंड िबट

197/18

00

00

10

197/19

00

02

16

197/15

00

00

62

197/14

00

47

77

197/13

00

01

32

197/6

00

03

09

197/9

00

01

33

197/7

00

04

24

197/5

00

00

32

197/8

00

03

15

197/1

00

11

74

198/2

00

00

10

200/4

00

18

00

200/3

00

07

54

200/1

00

02

23

199/12

00

00

17

199/9

00

17

00

184/1

00

28

78

184/6

00

01

07

कोतावलासा

नरापाम

10

00

01

93

8/1

00

18

47

4/3

00

08

70

5/10

00

00

93

5/16

00

07

37

5/19

00

00

10

91/1

00

08

28

91/2

00

07

29

कोतावलासा

देवाड़ा

154/3

00

19

14

152/2

00

00

93

152/4

00

09

67

152/5

00

06

47

152/6

00

01

77

155/1

00

02

52

155/2

00

01

23

155/7

00

00

50

155/8

00

00

72

6648

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश

मंडल का नाम

गर्ाम का नाम

सवᱷ नम्बर

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

कोतावलासा

देवाड़ा

155/9

00

09

83

157/2

00

00

72

157/1

00

09

84

157/6

00

05

14

157/5

00

00

10

157/8

00

03

40

159/2

00

07

21

176/1

00

01

17

179/1

00

00

11

180/1

00

01

60

180/10

00

06

15

180/11

00

06

89

180/14

00

07

28

180/16

00

01

36

180/23

00

05

54

180/22

00

05

22

180/26

00

00

13

180/19

00

03

33

180/20

00

08

50

180/29

00

00

29

182/8

00

00

93

कोतावलासा

वीराभदर्ापुरम

61/1

00

06

45

61/2

00

00

53

61/3

00

06

55

61/4

00

07

02

61/6

00

02

35

61/13

00

07

15

61/9

00

01

84

61/10

00

01

63

61/11

00

01

38

61/12

00

01

90

59/2

00

04

55

59/7

00

11

10

63/5

00

06

87

63/6

00

06

16

63/8

00

00

10

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6649

िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश

मंडल का नाम

गर्ाम का नाम

सवᱷ नम्बर

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

कोतावलासा

वीराभदर्ापुरम

63/10

00

00

10

63/15

00

06

71

58/7

00

00

10

64/3

00

00

10

64/6

00

00

35

65/1

00

05

35

65/3

00

06

17

65/4

00

00

15

66/5

00

00

71

कोतावलासा

सुंदरय्यापेटा

4/19

00

18

65

4/4

00

00

42

4/5

00

01

28

4/6

00

05

19

4/14

00

05

09

4/17

00

00

40

4/16

00

01

01

4/15

00

04

36

4/21

00

04

59

26/3

00

02

59

26/2

00

06

28

26/4

00

02

82

7/23

00

00

60

7/24

00

05

81

7/19

00

00

96

7/18

00

00

66

7/26

00

01

89

7/27

00

00

63

7/35

00

00

62

7/34

00

04

49

7/36

00

04

43

7/38

00

02

75

7/17

00

00

29

7/39

00

00

95

7/15

00

01

09

7/41

00

02

95

7/40

00

00

57

6650

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश

मंडल का नाम

गर्ाम का नाम

सवᱷ नम्बर

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

कोतावलासा

सुंदरय्यापेटा

24/2

00

01

37

24/3

00

00

88

24/4

00

00

30

24/1

00

01

15

24/5

00

00

78

24/7

00

00

30

24/15

00

06

41

24/28

00

01

85

24/29

00

03

01

24/27

00

00

64

24/37

00

03

82

24/39

00

00

10

24/35

00

01

02

24/36

00

00

76

24/38

00

00

96

20/4

00

00

17

20/5

00

10

96

20/9

00

00

10

20/6

00

01

15

20/7

00

00

82

20/8

00

00

57

22/1

00

01

38

22/3

00

02

48

21/1

00

02

78

21/3

00

00

10

21/2

00

08

69

21/21

00

04

08

21/27

00

02

80

21/28

00

00

40

21/30

00

03

75

21/31

00

07

77

21/38

00

00

33

40/16

00

09

81

40/18

00

00

21

40/23

00

04

17

40/28

00

00

10

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6651

िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश

मंडल का नाम

गर्ाम का नाम

सवᱷ नम्बर

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

कोतावलासा

सुंदरय्यापेटा

40/25

00

02

22

40/27

00

02

08

40/29

00

05

41

41/20

00

00

21

41/19

00

15

91

41/22

00

00

10

41/27

00

03

60

41/28

00

00

64

41/29

00

00

10

42/3

00

00

10

50/19

00

03

51

50/23

00

00

49

48/1

00

00

24

48/2

00

03

12

48/3

00

04

05

48/4

00

00

37

48/20

00

00

74

48/19

00

06

34

कोतावलासा

चीपुरुवलासा

116

00

03

02

113/4

00

03

50

113/10

00

21

05

112/2

00

06

35

108/5

00

01

70

108/6

00

07

45

108/7

00

00

24

108/19

00

00

15

108/17

00

03

30

108/18

00

00

10

108/16

00

01

14

108/15

00

04

06

108/13

00

01

22

108/12

00

00

15

41/6

00

01

00

41/23

00

00

86

41/24

00

01

88

41/16

00

00

10

6652

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश

मंडल का नाम

गर्ाम का नाम

सवᱷ नम्बर

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

कोतावलासा

चीपुरुवलासा

41/27

00

00

76

41/29

00

03

95

41/37

00

04

04

41/36

00

00

51

41/38

00

00

84

42/13

00

00

92

106/1

00

00

10

106/2

00

02

37

106/22

00

02

72

106/19

00

01

32

106/23

00

00

29

106/24

00

00

65

106/20

00

01

28

106/17

00

00

10

106/16

00

02

76

106/29

00

01

12

106/15

00

02

51

106/37

00

02

90

106/36

00

00

10

106/38

00

01

69

106/12

00

00

82

106/41

00

02

01

98/1

00

05

65

98/2

00

01

51

98/3

00

01

14

98/7

00

00

52

98/9

00

13

46

98/6

00

00

38

98/10

00

00

45

98/11

00

02

53

98/12

00

00

51

98/13

00

04

28

97/10

00

00

34

97/1

00

07

55

97/8

00

00

10

97/9

00

01

16

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6653

िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश

मंडल का नाम

गर्ाम का नाम

सवᱷ नम्बर

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

कोतावलासा

चीपुरुवलासा

97/7

00

00

10

97/11

00

03

66

97/12

00

03

17

97/13

00

01

91

97/14

00

00

56

97/20

00

00

10

95/5

00

01

10

95/4

00

00

61

106/31

00

00

10

106/25

00

00

10

97/5

00

00

10

41/15

00

00

10

108/22

00

00

10

106/11

00

00

10

96/16

00

00

10

कोतावलासा

गुिलिवदाड़ा

28/8

00

05

98

27/2

00

00

42

27/4

00

04

61

27/7

00

15

43

27/8

00

01

57

27/9

00

00

93

25/1

00

02

15

25/3

00

10

31

25/7

00

03

70

25/5

00

00

86

25/6

00

00

74

25/9

00

03

12

24/2

00

00

12

24/3

00

00

92

24/14

00

00

10

24/13

00

02

32

24/16

00

00

10

24/17

00

04

20

24/9

00

00

81

38/1

00

00

30

38/2

00

12

74

6654

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश

मंडल का नाम

गर्ाम का नाम

सवᱷ नम्बर

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

कोतावलासा

गुिलिवदाड़ा

38/9

00

02

88

38/7

00

00

10

38/10

00

01

20

38/8

00

10

91

37/8

00

12

98

37/7

00

00

10

37/9

00

00

26

37/11

00

00

29

37/13

00

00

13

37/14

00

06

68

37/17

00

10

19

36/7

00

01

30

41/1

00

07

12

41/2

00

00

24

41/14

00

08

82

41/18

00

00

68

41/19

00

10

66

44/33

00

07

16

43/1

00

09

21

43/3

00

04

32

51/8

00

03

65

51/10

00

00

95

52/1

00

01

39

52/2

00

13

48

53/1

00

01

59

55/8

00

12

45

55/6

00

00

41

55/7

00

00

23

55/10

00

06

33

55/11

00

02

30

54/9

00

00

98

54/11

00

06

38

31/2

00

00

76

61/11

00

02

39

61/5

00

03

71

61/15

00

02

56

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6655

िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश

मंडल का नाम

गर्ाम का नाम

सवᱷ नम्बर

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

कोतावलासा

गुिलिवदाड़ा

61/16

00

06

30

60/3

00

04

48

60/5

00

00

50

60/4

00

01

83

60/7

00

02

36

60/6

00

01

65

60/13

00

04

95

कोतावलासा

दᱶदेरु

3/1

00

01

34

3/20

00

00

10

3/22

00

03

82

3/23

00

00

10

3/27

00

04

42

3/28

00

05

43

3/26

00

02

12

8/2

00

14

15

7/1

00

03

18

39/2

00

01

22

39/11

00

06

90

39/8

00

00

10

39/9

00

04

92

41/4

00

00

27

41/14

00

08

47

41/13

00

04

14

41/15

00

01

37

41/16

00

06

86

46

00

28

31

47/3

00

01

00

47/8

00

21

61

47/9

00

07

69

47/11

00

09

83

6656

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

िजला:िविजयानगरमराज्य: आँधर् पर्देश

मंडल का नाम

गर्ाम का नाम

सवᱷ नम्बर

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

कोतावलासा

संतापालेम

16/1

00

50

99

16/2

00

34

09

15/3

00

00

39

19

00

39

35

20

00

26

46

25

00

29

88

24

00

31

32

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)252/2017-ओआर-I/ई-21033]

नोवस िकन् डो, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 6th December, 2018

S.O. 1758.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural

Gas, published in the Gazette of India No.36 Part-II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii) dated 09.09.2017 vide S.O. Number 2102

dated 07.09.2017 issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals pipelines (Acquisition of

Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) the Central Government declared

its intention to acquire the right of user in the land situated in Mandals:Gurla, Garividi, Kothavalasa,Chipurupalle and

Chipurupalli of VizianagaramDistrictin Andhra Pradesh State, specified in the schedule appended to that notification for

the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of petroleum products from Paradip in the State of Odisha to

Hyderabad in the State of Telangana by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the "Paradip–Hyderabad

Pipeline Project".

And whereas the copies of the Gazette were made available to the public. And whereas the Competent Authority has

under Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, has submitted his report of Central Government.

And whereas, the Central Government after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is

required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of the user therein;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is

hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government

hereby directs that the right of user of the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the Central

Government, vests on the date of publication of the declaration, in India Oil Corporation Limited, free from all

encumbrances.

SCHEDULE

DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH

MANDAL

VILLAGE

SURVEY NO.

AREA

Hectare

Are

Sq. Mt.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

CHIPURUPALLE

PATTIKAYAVALASA

197/17

00

00

12

202/8

00

00

34

202/9

00

01

34

173/8

00

07

05

173/7

00

05

67

173/9

00

04

71

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6657

DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH

MANDAL

VILLAGE

SURVEY NO.

AREA

Hectare

Are

Sq. Mt.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

CHIPURUPALLE

PATTIKAYAVALASA

173/6

00

00

49

173/5

00

07

43

170/17

00

04

01

170/16

00

00

88

170/18

00

05

49

170/19

00

05

25

170/20

00

02

27

170/22

00

01

07

170/21

00

03

85

170/7

00

02

11

170/6

00

02

10

170/5

00

03

80

170/4

00

03

05

167/18

00

00

14

167/17

00

03

11

167/12

00

00

10

167/11

00

01

47

167/10

00

03

43

167/7

00

05

87

167/3

00

00

10

167/6

00

04

31

167/5

00

05

76

166/3

00

04

25

CHIPURUPALLE

PEDANADIPALLE

95/3

00

09

45

95/2

00

03

24

95/1

00

27

85

86/2

00

30

43

87/10

00

01

05

87/11

00

00

73

87/9

00

06

87

87/13

00

01

00

87/14

00

03

40

87/15

00

03

30

87/16

00

04

31

87/17

00

04

45

87/18

00

00

72

53/1

00

00

36

53/9

00

03

94

53/11

00

15

53

53/10

00

05

42

55/1

00

02

12

53/5

00

08

64

55/3

00

06

74

55/7

00

04

18

55/6

00

01

13

6658

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH

MANDAL

VILLAGE

SURVEY NO.

AREA

Hectare

Are

Sq. Mt.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

CHIPURUPALLE

PEDANADIPALLE

55/8

00

05

26

55/10

00

07

30

55/9

00

00

10

56/1

00

00

60

56/2

00

14

44

56/3

00

02

70

57

00

02

70

69/1

00

06

04

69/2

00

14

47

69/3

00

03

42

69/5

00

03

04

69/6

00

03

69

69/9

00

01

53

71/6

00

08

11

71/3

00

08

50

72/2

00

13

72

72/1

00

02

43

72/4

00

11

53

72/8

00

00

10

72/7

00

08

68

73/6

00

02

91

73/5

00

09

94

73/4

00

10

17

73/3

00

01

99

CHIPURUPALLE

CHINANADIPALLI

43/1

00

05

58

42/2

00

01

62

42/7

00

04

68

42/9

00

07

77

42/10

00

08

90

42/13

00

02

37

42/12

00

05

18

42/11

00

00

10

39

00

16

83

38/1

00

05

91

38/5

00

00

10

18/10

00

00

10

18/11

00

01

22

18/14

00

04

93

18/15

00

00

10

18/13

00

01

45

18/16

00

06

66

19/15

00

00

17

19/16

00

01

13

19/20

00

02

39

19/21

00

02

22

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6659

DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH

MANDAL

VILLAGE

SURVEY NO.

AREA

Hectare

Are

Sq. Mt.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

CHIPURUPALLE

CHINANADIPALLI

19/22

00

03

70

19/23

00

01

64

19/28

00

00

77

19/27

00

02

99

19/29

00

00

26

19/30

00

01

42

19/31

00

00

53

19/26

00

02

43

20/2

00

00

18

21/6

00

03

86

21/7

00

04

04

21/8

00

00

22

21/10

00

02

47

21/11

00

00

41

21/15

00

02

71

21/12

00

00

36

21/16

00

00

32

21/17

00

13

86

21/21

00

00

34

21/20

00

00

10

7/15

00

00

75

25/1

00

07

96

26/3

00

11

24

26/2

00

28

92

26/1

00

03

33

27/1

00

10

96

27/2

00

04

07

27/9

00

01

40

27/8

00

00

10

CHIPURUPALLI

ITKARLAPALLI

168/18

00

09

28

168/22

00

00

13

168/23

00

03

66

168/30

00

01

45

168/31

00

00

10

168/27

00

03

99

168/26

00

00

88

168/28

00

00

60

168/24

00

03

61

168/25

00

00

10

168/10

00

10

92

169/7

00

00

36

169/6

00

02

36

169/2

00

05

74

169/3

00

01

05

169/4

00

00

26

6660

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH

MANDAL

VILLAGE

SURVEY NO.

AREA

Hectare

Are

Sq. Mt.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

CHIPURUPALLI

ITKARLAPALLI

169/1

00

01

99

166/14

00

01

39

166/13

00

02

89

166/15

00

00

81

166/16

00

05

93

166/4

00

00

10

166/3

00

02

45

166/2

00

01

51

166/17

00

01

58

166/1

00

00

22

166/18

00

04

10

165/14

00

02

07

165/15

00

02

64

165/16

00

02

19

165/17

00

02

30

165/6

00

07

09

165/5

00

02

32

165/18

00

00

10

165/19

00

04

34

165/20

00

04

40

165/22

00

01

24

164/24

00

06

61

164/21

00

03

17

164/20

00

02

88

164/19

00

03

04

164/18

00

03

08

164/16

00

08

04

156/26

00

16

66

156/23

00

03

63

156/22

00

01

32

156/25

00

05

19

156/13

00

06

94

156/12

00

15

08

156/11

00

00

50

155/45

00

04

33

155/23

00

02

19

155/17

00

03

27

155/16

00

02

05

155/14

00

01

62

154/7

00

00

32

154/6

00

02

54

154/5

00

03

77

154/3

00

03

05

154/2

00

04

23

154/1

00

04

28

153/20

00

00

10

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6661

DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH

MANDAL

VILLAGE

SURVEY NO.

AREA

Hectare

Are

Sq. Mt.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

CHIPURUPALLI

ITKARLAPALLI

153/19

00

01

13

153/18

00

02

50

153/17

00

02

24

153/16

00

02

71

152/3

00

11

94

150/13

00

07

19

150/6

00

11

04

150/7

00

01

82

177/3

00

06

19

177/2

00

16

64

177/1

00

07

88

178/1

00

03

90

176/3

00

11

17

176/2

00

07

61

176/1

00

22

51

147/3

00

34

43

CHIPURUPALLI

POTAYYAVALASA

78/4

00

19

96

78/3

00

21

48

76/2

00

21

85

76/1

00

02

34

70/4

00

08

66

72/2

00

22

74

72/3

00

03

36

72/4

00

04

13

CHIPURUPALLE

PARLA

154/15

00

29

21

155/6

00

01

65

163/2

00

04

50

162/23

00

00

77

162/22

00

00

43

162/19

00

00

67

162/18

00

00

95

161/17

00

01

48

161/16

00

03

05

162/14

00

01

26

162/13

00

00

81

161/9

00

01

45

162/10

00

00

86

162/9

00

01

11

161/8

00

00

77

161/5

00

02

55

161/4

00

02

71

161/2

00

00

79

161/1

00

07

54

160/19

00

01

20

6662

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH

MANDAL

VILLAGE

SURVEY NO.

AREA

Hectare

Are

Sq. Mt.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

CHIPURUPALLE

PARLA

160/20

00

01

17

160/21

00

00

97

160/14

00

00

79

160/15

00

02

25

160/9

00

01

19

160/10

00

01

11

160/5

00

01

83

160/3

00

00

53

160/4

00

02

78

100/28

00

00

91

100/26

00

00

92

184/2

00

03

83

184/1

00

03

78

185/15

00

02

00

185/16

00

03

05

185/13

00

00

32

185/12

00

04

98

185/11

00

05

96

185/4

00

03

07

185/3

00

00

93

185/2

00

00

82

185/1

00

01

08

189/18

00

00

50

186

00

06

59

189/12

00

05

75

188/2

00

02

86

188/5

00

00

38

188/7

00

00

65

188/8

00

00

48

188/9

00

00

77

188/1

00

05

42

189/11

00

00

86

191/17

00

05

08

191/16

00

00

64

191/14

00

01

55

191/13

00

02

29

191/12

00

01

15

191/3

00

08

02

192/19

00

02

17

192/8

00

04

37

192/18

00

00

53

192/17

00

01

19

192/11

00

02

97

192/12

00

01

93

192/10

00

03

28

192/4

00

00

10

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6663

DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH

MANDAL

VILLAGE

SURVEY NO.

AREA

Hectare

Are

Sq. Mt.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

CHIPURUPALLE

PARLA

192/3

00

00

12

192/2

00

00

88

192/13

00

01

71

192/1

00

01

94

193/3

00

00

16

193/2

00

00

96

193/1

00

00

64

78/15

00

00

10

GARIVIDI

DUMMIDA

179/16

00

03

48

179/12

00

07

06

179/13

00

00

13

179/10

00

01

21

175/19

00

05

63

176/10

00

01

57

176/9

00

04

04

176/8

00

04

72

176/7

00

02

67

176/6

00

09

87

176/4

00

13

10

60

00

03

47

176/3

00

15

67

165/4

00

10

39

165/5

00

02

40

165/2

00

00

12

165/6

00

02

05

165/7

00

14

22

165/12

00

04

79

165/13

00

00

10

164/25

00

02

67

164/31

00

04

86

164/30

00

06

53

164/29

00

02

96

164/11

00

00

26

163/5

00

00

26

163/4

00

07

79

163/2

00

00

10

163/3

00

00

79

69/16

00

04

20

70/1

00

15

02

70/5

00

04

29

70/9

00

00

62

70/6

00

00

10

68/1

00

00

94

67/7

00

02

32

67/6

00

11

85

6664

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH

MANDAL

VILLAGE

SURVEY NO.

AREA

Hectare

Are

Sq. Mt.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

GARIVIDI

DUMMIDA

66/6

00

01

18

66/3

00

02

99

66/1

00

07

80

66/4

00

01

68

85/5

00

00

51

85/2

00

09

16

85/3

00

00

66

85/7

00

07

56

85/9

00

01

49

85/10

00

00

20

85/8

00

04

61

85/11

00

08

14

85/13

00

02

01

95/16

01

02

28

95/15

00

02

32

95/14

00

04

52

95/17

00

01

10

96/2

00

06

85

96/3

00

02

13

96/4

00

00

18

96/8

00

04

27

96/7

00

00

10

96/9

00

05

67

96/14

00

00

58

96/13

00

05

57

96/12

00

00

22

96/19

00

09

01

97/1

00

05

75

97/2

00

05

20

97/3

00

10

34

101/11

00

02

82

101/35

00

14

13

101/36

00

02

09

101/28

00

00

82

101/29

00

00

10

101/27

00

02

57

101/26

00

01

94

101/24

00

04

15

101/23

00

02

16

100/20

00

02

56

100/19

00

00

14

100/7

00

00

25

100/8

00

03

84

100/9

00

03

99

100/11

00

00

16

100/12

00

02

87

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6665

DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH

MANDAL

VILLAGE

SURVEY NO.

AREA

Hectare

Are

Sq. Mt.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

GARIVIDI

DUMMIDA

107/27

00

02

63

100/13

00

02

07

107/28

00

02

47

107/29

00

01

39

107/18

00

00

52

107/15

00

02

89

107/16

00

01

77

107/13

00

02

00

107/12

00

03

64

107/11

00

02

84

130/19

00

00

10

107/9

00

00

95

130/14

00

10

58

107/4

00

01

78

107/3

00

05

34

129/1

00

00

10

108

00

24

54

127/2

00

04

64

127/3

00

04

74

GURLA

SADANANDAPURAM

73/8

00

00

88

73/5

00

01

10

GURLA

NAGALLAVALASA

86/15

00

00

10

87/20

00

06

21

87/22

00

00

40

87/21

00

01

65

87/18

00

06

63

87/19

00

00

30

87/16

00

00

36

87/25

00

00

84

87/17

00

05

98

87/2

00

03

25

84/29

00

02

26

84/31

00

00

59

84/30

00

00

70

84/27

00

00

27

84/28

00

05

29

84/25

00

02

85

84/24

00

00

10

82/1

00

05

54

83/2

00

21

51

83/5

00

01

26

83/4

00

01

93

83/3

00

01

39

56

00

06

00

6666

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH

MANDAL

VILLAGE

SURVEY NO.

AREA

Hectare

Are

Sq. Mt.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

GURLA

NAGALLAVALASA

54/13

00

08

77

54/12

00

00

35

55/11

00

01

30

55/10

00

13

20

55/9

00

00

94

55/8

00

10

00

55/12

00

01

67

55/13

00

00

24

43

00

03

37

42/10

00

23

10

42/6

00

01

30

42/5

00

01

87

41/14

00

04

24

41/12

00

02

57

41/11

00

02

26

41/6

00

02

38

41/1

00

02

69

40/28

00

04

02

40/23

00

02

35

40/16

00

01

27

40/15

00

00

90

40/9

00

01

45

40/8

00

00

43

39/11

00

00

17

39/8

00

00

10

39/12

00

05

04

39/22

00

00

45

39/23

00

00

53

39/13

00

01

80

39/14

00

00

19

39/5

00

02

66

39/4

00

00

19

39/3

00

01

59

37/24

00

05

31

37/15

00

04

94

37/14

00

02

82

37/13

00

02

65

37/6

00

02

81

37/5

00

01

24

62/2

00

00

10

62/1

00

02

45

34/19

00

00

46

34/15

00

00

78

34/13

00

01

10

34/10

00

00

55

34/9

00

00

10

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6667

DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH

MANDAL

VILLAGE

SURVEY NO.

AREA

Hectare

Are

Sq. Mt.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

GURLA

NAGALLAVALASA

65/11

00

03

21

65/1

00

06

15

65/9

00

03

50

65/8

00

00

55

65/7

00

08

21

65/2

00

04

74

65/6

00

02

31

65/3

00

02

80

29/1

00

03

02

29/10

00

01

14

29/11

00

04

34

29/12

00

03

94

29/13

00

01

40

29/15

00

04

50

29/16

00

05

26

29/18

00

07

84

29/17

00

00

49

66/2

00

02

76

66/3

00

01

75

66/4

00

00

10

66/1

00

00

91

GURLA

JAMMU

88/11

00

12

18

90/3

00

08

63

90/4

00

00

30

90/2

00

04

74

90/7

00

07

54

90/6

00

01

08

93/21

00

06

59

93/22

00

02

74

93/12

00

03

58

93/24

00

07

63

93/13

00

00

12

93/9

00

01

03

93/11

00

02

72

93/10

00

04

18

93/7

00

00

74

93/5

00

04

89

93/6

00

00

10

95/20

00

00

10

95/21

00

01

81

95/22

00

06

45

95/24

00

04

04

95/23

00

00

81

97/23

00

00

10

97/22

00

04

73

6668

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH

MANDAL

VILLAGE

SURVEY NO.

AREA

Hectare

Are

Sq. Mt.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

GURLA

JAMMU

97/12

00

03

53

97/21

00

00

56

97/11

00

01

39

97/13

00

01

34

97/10

00

00

10

97/14

00

05

00

97/15

00

01

19

97/7

00

03

67

97/6

00

05

08

97/3

00

03

33

97/2

00

00

54

275/3

00

00

27

275/2

00

01

38

275/1

00

06

12

275/10

00

00

93

270/22

00

00

22

270/23

00

02

83

270/26

00

01

40

270/24

00

00

10

270/27

00

01

96

270/28

00

05

52

270/25

00

00

69

270/10

00

01

73

269/12

00

04

96

269/11

00

01

05

269/14

00

00

32

269/10

00

04

62

269/9

00

04

08

269/8

00

00

30

269/5

00

01

86

269/7

00

01

52

296/6

00

01

15

269/4

00

00

10

268/4

00

02

20

268/3

00

02

79

268/2

00

04

22

268/1

00

04

40

101/13

00

07

57

113/2

00

09

84

112/5

00

00

68

112/8

00

07

47

112/10

00

08

40

112/9

00

03

09

111/2

00

00

10

111/1

00

05

56

111/3

00

01

84

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6669

DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH

MANDAL

VILLAGE

SURVEY NO.

AREA

Hectare

Are

Sq. Mt.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

GURLA

JAMMU

109/3

00

00

10

109/5

00

00

50

109/13

00

01

07

109/12

00

03

09

109/11

00

01

61

109/10

00

01

10

110/1

00

01

83

108/14

00

01

08

108/15

00

03

20

108/18

00

00

28

108/19

00

02

80

108/12

00

00

10

108/13

00

00

90

108/20

00

04

17

108/23

00

03

41

108/24

00

08

79

108/25

00

01

39

107/35

00

04

59

117/2

00

16

18

117/1

00

10

16

119/1

00

08

59

118/9

00

01

13

118/2

00

06

05

126/36

00

03

37

126/35

00

02

25

126/34

00

02

70

126/9

00

02

74

126/8

00

00

10

123/6

00

00

10

123/5

00

00

68

123/1

00

06

69

123/2

00

00

10

125

00

05

30

151/11

00

01

50

151/14

00

02

00

151/15

00

00

40

151/12

00

02

55

151/10

00

01

70

151/6

00

08

40

152/8

00

02

23

152/1

00

00

10

182/25

00

00

10

182/26

00

05

26

182/27

00

00

45

182/18

00

00

35

182/19

00

02

05

6670

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH

MANDAL

VILLAGE

SURVEY NO.

AREA

Hectare

Are

Sq. Mt.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

GURLA

JAMMU

182/17

00

02

27

182/11

00

01

00

182/9

00

00

10

182/10

00

02

00

182/12

00

02

71

182/13

00

00

41

183/19

00

00

72

183/18

00

00

38

183/17

00

00

10

183/20

00

02

48

183/21

00

04

95

183/24

00

00

36

183/22

00

01

39

183/23

00

00

22

183/7

00

00

92

183/6

00

01

95

183/5

00

01

33

183/4

00

01

72

183/3

00

01

55

183/2

00

06

47

179/12

00

01

14

179/13

00

04

71

179/11

00

02

55

179/10

00

02

37

179/2

00

02

35

179/1

00

02

94

178/24

00

01

52

178/23

00

01

44

178/22

00

01

62

178/4

00

00

10

178/3

00

04

29

178/2

00

00

52

178/1

00

02

19

176/31

00

00

10

176/30

00

10

89

176/1

00

05

82

175/23

00

00

15

175/20

00

06

34

175/19

00

01

90

197/19

00

06

76

197/20

00

04

79

197/30

00

00

89

197/29

00

00

69

197/28

00

00

73

197/27

00

00

28

197/26

00

00

39

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6671

DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH

MANDAL

VILLAGE

SURVEY NO.

AREA

Hectare

Are

Sq. Mt.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

GURLA

JAMMU

197/25

00

00

36

197/24

00

00

25

197/23

00

03

85

196/19

00

14

35

196/25

00

09

19

196/20

00

00

66

196/21

00

01

55

196/24

00

00

20

196/23

00

00

35

196/22

00

00

54

209/2

00

01

99

211/19

00

01

71

211/18

00

00

40

211/7

00

13

43

211/17

00

00

16

211/6

00

00

10

211/8

00

00

19

211/16

00

00

10

211/10

00

02

51

211/9

00

02

22

211/11

00

02

81

211/12

00

02

57

211/15

00

00

30

211/14

00

00

61

211/13

00

02

15

216/4

00

04

95

216/3

00

00

14

214/12

00

00

10

214/11

00

00

65

214/10

00

01

03

214/9

00

04

80

214/7

00

00

28

214/8

00

07

49

GURLA

GARIDA

99/23

00

02

04

99/24

00

02

68

99/25

00

01

33

99/26

00

03

58

99/17

00

01

92

99/27

00

02

53

99/28

00

02

43

99/29

00

02

43

99/15

00

01

92

99/14

00

04

31

99/13

00

00

11

99/1

00

07

92

6672

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH

MANDAL

VILLAGE

SURVEY NO.

AREA

Hectare

Are

Sq. Mt.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

GURLA

GARIDA

76/6

00

05

45

76/7

00

00

55

76/9

00

15

63

75/14

00

01

83

75/12

00

03

61

75/13

00

00

62

75/11

00

05

60

75/1

00

00

16

79/15

00

00

10

79/14

00

02

06

79/12

00

01

94

79/11

00

00

10

80/20

00

06

96

80/18

00

00

32

80/12

00

02

90

80/13

00

03

31

80/5

00

02

65

80/4

00

05

34

80/2

00

01

05

31/8

00

02

10

31/7

00

00

93

32/19

00

00

10

32/18

00

01

46

32/17

00

02

45

32/16

00

01

32

30/20

00

00

60

30/19

00

00

10

30/16

00

02

65

30/15

00

02

68

30/14

00

00

10

30/6

00

01

19

30/7

00

09

41

30/5

00

01

26

30/4

00

02

33

30/3

00

00

85

34/34

00

00

98

34/32

00

01

73

34/31

00

01

74

34/23

00

02

10

34/22

00

00

20

34/24

00

01

59

34/25

00

00

10

34/14

00

00

73

34/15

00

01

15

34/16

00

00

19

34/9

00

01

53

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6673

DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH

MANDAL

VILLAGE

SURVEY NO.

AREA

Hectare

Are

Sq. Mt.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

GURLA

GARIDA

34/8

00

01

31

34/4

00

03

33

34/2

00

01

68

34/3

00

00

21

35/2

00

00

10

35/5

00

00

54

35/6

00

00

81

35/8

00

01

09

35/7

00

00

21

35/9

00

00

66

35/10

00

00

56

35/11

00

00

49

35/12

00

02

35

35/13

00

01

41

35/14

00

00

48

35/17

00

00

10

35/32

00

02

49

35/34

00

01

81

35/35

00

00

35

35/31

00

00

10

12/12

00

00

30

12/13

00

00

10

12/11

00

01

77

12/10

00

02

80

12/9

00

02

59

12/7

00

03

92

12/6

00

03

00

12/5

00

05

66

7/10

00

04

82

7/9

00

04

37

7/24

00

01

46

7/23

00

00

99

7/22

00

00

32

7/21

00

00

14

7/20

00

00

25

7/19

00

00

62

7/11

00

06

94

7/12

00

02

64

7/13

00

05

21

7/14

00

00

10

7/15

00

00

10

6/19

00

06

93

6/20

00

05

10

6/21

00

05

05

6/22

00

05

44

6/23

00

05

47

6674

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH

MANDAL

VILLAGE

SURVEY NO.

AREA

Hectare

Are

Sq. Mt.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

GURLA

GARIDA

6/24

00

02

81

3/3

00

01

92

3/9

00

00

20

3/8

00

01

55

3/7

00

02

99

3/6

00

07

20

3/5

00

02

80

3/11

00

04

00

3/12

00

00

10

2/8

00

08

95

2/4

00

07

65

2/5

00

06

16

2/6

00

01

12

2/12

00

00

10

2/13

00

11

70

GURLA

GORLAPETA_JAGANADHAPURAM

23/2

00

01

62

23/21

00

03

87

23/20

00

00

58

23/18

00

01

14

23/17

00

02

76

23/16

00

04

17

23/10

00

02

20

23/13

00

01

19

23/12

00

02

29

23/11

00

02

10

23/9

00

01

11

22/12

00

08

39

22/26

00

00

18

22/25

00

00

73

22/13

00

02

67

22/24

00

02

60

22/23

00

03

65

22/18

00

05

75

18/21

00

00

19

18/23

00

00

40

18/22

00

03

34

13/13

00

03

81

14/8

00

02

90

14/7

00

05

42

14/6

00

07

63

14/3

00

08

11

14/2

00

10

31

14/1

00

00

59

15/1

00

07

77

11/16

00

02

57

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6675

DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH

MANDAL

VILLAGE

SURVEY NO.

AREA

Hectare

Are

Sq. Mt.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

GURLA

GORLAPETA_JAGANADHAPURAM

11/15

00

21

61

11/14

00

00

10

GURLA

KELLA

34/1

00

03

30

33/2

00

30

05

7

00

41

17

8/18

00

02

52

8/21

00

19

06

8/25

00

08

32

8/24

00

00

87

8/20

00

06

85

8/19

00

00

29

13/23

00

00

20

13/22

00

08

90

13/21

00

00

57

13/20

00

04

87

13/17

00

09

30

13/16

00

03

39

13/15

00

05

38

13/1

00

04

38

13/2

00

00

10

347/20

00

05

56

346/2

00

07

69

346/1

00

00

45

346/3

00

11

01

346/4

00

11

90

346/7

00

00

65

346/6

00

01

72

346/5

00

06

57

346/8

00

01

20

14/10

00

06

47

14/9

00

00

10

GURLA

GOSADA

24/16

00

00

10

24/17

00

08

46

24/18

00

04

21

24/20

00

00

86

24/19

00

06

71

24/8

00

02

96

24/9

00

04

49

24/10

00

02

36

25/1

00

01

38

21/14

00

03

00

21/10

00

07

07

21/9

00

01

42

21/8

00

00

10

6676

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH

MANDAL

VILLAGE

SURVEY NO.

AREA

Hectare

Are

Sq. Mt.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

GURLA

GOSADA

21/5

00

01

98

21/6

00

02

00

21/1

00

04

91

20/12

00

03

88

20/10

00

04

42

20/9

00

01

37

20/5

00

03

39

19/2

00

05

61

19/1

00

13

54

19/4

00

00

56

16/1

00

07

51

16/5

00

03

28

16/3

00

06

70

16/4

00

00

10

15/6

00

05

30

15/5

00

01

83

15/3

00

00

15

15/8

00

07

34

15/9

00

04

40

15/15

00

00

25

15/14

00

01

49

15/12

00

00

89

57/5

00

03

16

57/6

00

03

40

57/7

00

03

56

57/10

00

01

50

57/12

00

04

04

57/9

00

01

27

57/13

00

05

05

57/14

00

00

29

64/2

00

01

28

64/5

00

05

23

64/8

00

05

46

65/1

00

10

72

65/2

00

11

90

66/3

00

04

68

66/2

00

00

10

66/4

00

02

67

66/5

00

04

73

66/6

00

04

15

66/17

00

00

90

66/16

00

04

67

66/15

00

00

90

66/13

00

01

73

68/9

00

03

08

68/8

00

03

93

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6677

DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH

MANDAL

VILLAGE

SURVEY NO.

AREA

Hectare

Are

Sq. Mt.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

GURLA

GOSADA

68/7

00

06

76

68/4

00

03

53

68/3

00

06

31

68/5

00

00

39

68/6

00

00

92

69/1

00

01

79

GURLA

KALAVACHERLA

60/6

00

00

46

60/7

00

01

87

60/8

00

02

83

60/11

00

02

42

60/9

00

01

13

60/3

00

00

17

60/10

00

01

22

62/4

00

00

10

62/5

00

02

82

62/6

00

01

46

62/7

00

00

95

62/8

00

03

56

62/9

00

01

85

29/14

00

03

99

29/15

00

04

53

29/13

00

00

81

29/12

00

00

55

29/11

00

00

54

29/16

00

02

83

29/17

00

00

10

29/10

00

02

71

29/32

00

00

10

29/9

00

02

55

29/8

00

04

96

29/3

00

04

22

29/33

00

00

10

29/2

00

02

68

29/1

00

02

94

30/21

00

00

60

30/20

00

01

00

30/19

00

01

04

30/18

00

01

71

30/14

00

00

38

30/17

00

02

91

30/16

00

03

14

30/15

00

03

10

30/6

00

03

63

30/4

00

03

49

30/3

00

01

54

6678

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH

MANDAL

VILLAGE

SURVEY NO.

AREA

Hectare

Are

Sq. Mt.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

GURLA

KALAVACHERLA

28/2

00

01

66

28/1

00

04

22

32/8

00

02

90

32/7

00

00

23

32/9

00

01

54

32/10

00

01

94

32/11

00

02

24

32/12

00

00

10

32/6

00

02

77

32/5

00

00

45

32/3

00

02

79

32/2

00

04

43

34/14

00

00

59

34/10

00

00

58

34/9

00

02

38

34/8

00

01

36

34/7

00

01

60

34/2

00

02

06

34/1

00

04

34

37/7

00

05

21

37/4

00

05

61

37/9

00

00

30

37/10

00

00

35

37/11

00

00

44

37/2

00

00

10

37/3

00

04

34

37/12

00

04

24

38

00

03

55

39/6

00

00

47

39/7

00

02

24

39/5

00

08

87

39/8

00

00

10

39/3

00

00

29

39/10

00

06

27

39/11

00

02

64

39/13

00

00

54

39/12

00

04

73

2/10

00

00

36

1/3

00

20

37

2/6

00

03

85

2/7

00

05

89

GURLA

KOTTA GANDREDU

92/3

00

10

90

86/1

00

00

42

63/8

00

03

62

63/9

00

00

31

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6679

DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH

MANDAL

VILLAGE

SURVEY NO.

AREA

Hectare

Are

Sq. Mt.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

GURLA

KOTTA GANDREDU

64/22

00

00

32

64/21

00

01

49

64/20

00

04

57

64/15

00

15

90

64/5

00

00

39

64/3

00

02

62

64/2

00

00

26

65/5

00

08

61

48/16

00

12

10

48/17

00

03

74

48/3

00

00

69

48/1

00

05

73

31/30

00

04

32

31/23

00

06

01

31/12

00

01

80

31/11

00

03

52

31/25

00

00

17

31/9

00

00

12

31/10

00

01

09

31/4

00

01

91

31/3

00

01

28

31/2

00

00

10

34/4

00

03

09

34/5

00

00

97

34/6

00

03

01

34/3

00

02

59

34/2

00

02

76

34/1

00

10

80

GURLA

ANANDAPURAM END BIT

194/2

00

07

78

194/3

00

00

83

194/4

00

00

68

194/5

00

00

81

194/6

00

01

48

194/1

00

03

35

195/5

00

00

67

195/4

00

00

82

195/3

00

00

34

195/6

00

01

32

195/7

00

02

51

195/2

00

00

25

195/10

00

17

62

195/9

00

00

10

195/11

00

00

47

197/18

00

00

10

197/19

00

02

16

6680

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH

MANDAL

VILLAGE

SURVEY NO.

AREA

Hectare

Are

Sq. Mt.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

GURLA

ANANDAPURAM END BIT

197/15

00

00

62

197/14

00

47

77

197/13

00

01

32

197/6

00

03

09

197/9

00

01

33

197/7

00

04

24

197/5

00

00

32

197/8

00

03

15

197/1

00

11

74

198/2

00

00

10

200/4

00

18

00

200/3

00

07

54

200/1

00

02

23

199/12

00

00

17

199/9

00

17

00

184/1

00

28

78

184/6

00

01

07

KOTHAVALASA

NARAPAM

10

00

01

93

8/1

00

18

47

4/3

00

08

70

5/10

00

00

93

5/16

00

07

37

5/19

00

00

10

91/1

00

08

28

91/2

00

07

29

KOTHAVALASA

DEVADA

154/3

00

19

14

152/2

00

00

93

152/4

00

09

67

152/5

00

06

47

152/6

00

01

77

155/1

00

02

52

155/2

00

01

23

155/7

00

00

50

155/8

00

00

72

155/9

00

09

83

157/2

00

00

72

157/1

00

09

84

157/6

00

05

14

157/5

00

00

10

157/8

00

03

40

159/2

00

07

21

176/1

00

01

17

179/1

00

00

11

180/1

00

01

60

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6681

DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH

MANDAL

VILLAGE

SURVEY NO.

AREA

Hectare

Are

Sq. Mt.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

KOTHAVALASA

DEVADA

180/10

00

06

15

180/11

00

06

89

180/14

00

07

28

180/16

00

01

36

180/23

00

05

54

180/22

00

05

22

180/26

00

00

13

180/19

00

03

33

180/20

00

08

50

180/29

00

00

29

182/8

00

00

93

KOTHAVALASA

VIRABHADRA PURAM

61/1

00

06

45

61/2

00

00

53

61/3

00

06

55

61/4

00

07

02

61/6

00

02

35

61/13

00

07

15

61/9

00

01

84

61/10

00

01

63

61/11

00

01

38

61/12

00

01

90

59/2

00

04

55

59/7

00

11

10

63/5

00

06

87

63/6

00

06

16

63/8

00

00

10

63/10

00

00

10

63/15

00

06

71

58/7

00

00

10

64/3

00

00

10

64/6

00

00

35

65/1

00

05

35

65/3

00

06

17

65/4

00

00

15

66/5

00

00

71

KOTHAVALASA

SUNDARAYYA PETA

4/19

00

18

65

4/4

00

00

42

4/5

00

01

28

4/6

00

05

19

4/14

00

05

09

4/17

00

00

40

4/16

00

01

01

4/15

00

04

36

4/21

00

04

59

6682

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH

MANDAL

VILLAGE

SURVEY NO.

AREA

Hectare

Are

Sq. Mt.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

KOTHAVALASA

SUNDARAYYA PETA

26/3

00

02

59

26/2

00

06

28

26/4

00

02

82

7/23

00

00

60

7/24

00

05

81

7/19

00

00

96

7/18

00

00

66

7/26

00

01

89

7/27

00

00

63

7/35

00

00

62

7/34

00

04

49

7/36

00

04

43

7/38

00

02

75

7/17

00

00

29

7/39

00

00

95

7/15

00

01

09

7/41

00

02

95

7/40

00

00

57

24/2

00

01

37

24/3

00

00

88

24/4

00

00

30

24/1

00

01

15

24/5

00

00

78

24/7

00

00

30

24/15

00

06

41

24/28

00

01

85

24/29

00

03

01

24/27

00

00

64

24/37

00

03

82

24/39

00

00

10

24/35

00

01

02

24/36

00

00

76

24/38

00

00

96

20/4

00

00

17

20/5

00

10

96

20/9

00

00

10

20/6

00

01

15

20/7

00

00

82

20/8

00

00

57

22/1

00

01

38

22/3

00

02

48

21/1

00

02

78

21/3

00

00

10

21/2

00

08

69

21/21

00

04

08

21/27

00

02

80

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6683

DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH

MANDAL

VILLAGE

SURVEY NO.

AREA

Hectare

Are

Sq. Mt.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

KOTHAVALASA

SUNDARAYYA PETA

21/28

00

00

40

21/30

00

03

75

21/31

00

07

77

21/38

00

00

33

40/16

00

09

81

40/18

00

00

21

40/23

00

04

17

40/28

00

00

10

40/25

00

02

22

40/27

00

02

08

40/29

00

05

41

41/20

00

00

21

41/19

00

15

91

41/22

00

00

10

41/27

00

03

60

41/28

00

00

64

41/29

00

00

10

42/3

00

00

10

50/19

00

03

51

50/23

00

00

49

48/1

00

00

24

48/2

00

03

12

48/3

00

04

05

48/4

00

00

37

48/20

00

00

74

48/19

00

06

34

KOTHAVALASA

CHIPURUVALASA

116

00

03

02

113/4

00

03

50

113/10

00

21

05

112/2

00

06

35

108/5

00

01

70

108/6

00

07

45

108/7

00

00

24

108/19

00

00

15

108/17

00

03

30

108/18

00

00

10

108/16

00

01

14

108/15

00

04

06

108/13

00

01

22

108/12

00

00

15

41/6

00

01

00

41/23

00

00

86

41/24

00

01

88

41/16

00

00

10

41/27

00

00

76

6684

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH

MANDAL

VILLAGE

SURVEY NO.

AREA

Hectare

Are

Sq. Mt.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

KOTHAVALASA

CHIPURUVALASA

41/29

00

03

95

41/37

00

04

04

41/36

00

00

51

41/38

00

00

84

42/13

00

00

92

106/1

00

00

10

106/2

00

02

37

106/22

00

02

72

106/19

00

01

32

106/23

00

00

29

106/24

00

00

65

106/20

00

01

28

106/17

00

00

10

106/16

00

02

76

106/29

00

01

12

106/15

00

02

51

106/37

00

02

90

106/36

00

00

10

106/38

00

01

69

106/12

00

00

82

106/41

00

02

01

98/1

00

05

65

98/2

00

01

51

98/3

00

01

14

98/7

00

00

52

98/9

00

13

46

98/6

00

00

38

98/10

00

00

45

98/11

00

02

53

98/12

00

00

51

98/13

00

04

28

97/10

00

00

34

97/1

00

07

55

97/8

00

00

10

97/9

00

01

16

97/7

00

00

10

97/11

00

03

66

97/12

00

03

17

97/13

00

01

91

97/14

00

00

56

97/20

00

00

10

95/5

00

01

10

95/4

00

00

61

106/31

00

00

10

106/25

00

00

10

97/5

00

00

10

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6685

DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH

MANDAL

VILLAGE

SURVEY NO.

AREA

Hectare

Are

Sq. Mt.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

KOTHAVALASA

CHIPURUVALASA

41/15

00

00

10

108/22

00

00

10

106/11

00

00

10

96/16

00

00

10

KOTHAVALASA

GULIVINDADA

28/8

00

05

98

27/2

00

00

42

27/4

00

04

61

27/7

00

15

43

27/8

00

01

57

27/9

00

00

93

25/1

00

02

15

25/3

00

10

31

25/7

00

03

70

25/5

00

00

86

25/6

00

00

74

25/9

00

03

12

24/2

00

00

12

24/3

00

00

92

24/14

00

00

10

24/13

00

02

32

24/16

00

00

10

24/17

00

04

20

24/9

00

00

81

38/1

00

00

30

38/2

00

12

74

38/9

00

02

88

38/7

00

00

10

38/10

00

01

20

38/8

00

10

91

37/8

00

12

98

37/7

00

00

10

37/9

00

00

26

37/11

00

00

29

37/13

00

00

13

37/14

00

06

68

37/17

00

10

19

36/7

00

01

30

41/1

00

07

12

41/2

00

00

24

41/14

00

08

82

41/18

00

00

68

41/19

00

10

66

44/33

00

07

16

43/1

00

09

21

43/3

00

04

32

6686

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH

MANDAL

VILLAGE

SURVEY NO.

AREA

Hectare

Are

Sq. Mt.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

KOTHAVALASA

GULIVINDADA

51/8

00

03

65

51/10

00

00

95

52/1

00

01

39

52/2

00

13

48

53/1

00

01

59

55/8

00

12

45

55/6

00

00

41

55/7

00

00

23

55/10

00

06

33

55/11

00

02

30

54/9

00

00

98

54/11

00

06

38

31/2

00

00

76

61/11

00

02

39

61/5

00

03

71

61/15

00

02

56

61/16

00

06

30

60/3

00

04

48

60/5

00

00

50

60/4

00

01

83

60/7

00

02

36

60/6

00

01

65

60/13

00

04

95

KOTTAVALASA

DANDERU

3/1

00

01

34

3/20

00

00

10

3/22

00

03

82

3/23

00

00

10

3/27

00

04

42

3/28

00

05

43

3/26

00

02

12

8/2

00

14

15

7/1

00

03

18

39/2

00

01

22

39/11

00

06

90

39/8

00

00

10

39/9

00

04

92

41/4

00

00

27

41/14

00

08

47

41/13

00

04

14

41/15

00

01

37

41/16

00

06

86

46

00

28

31

47/3

00

01

00

47/8

00

21

61

47/9

00

07

69

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6687

DISTRICT : VIZIANAGARAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH

MANDAL

VILLAGE

SURVEY NO.

AREA

Hectare

Are

Sq. Mt.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

KOTTAVALASA

DANDERU

47/11

00

09

83

KOTHAVALASA

SANTAPALEM

16/1

00

50

99

16/2

00

34

09

15/3

00

00

39

19

00

39

35

20

00

26

46

25

00

29

88

24

00

31

32

[F. No. R-11025(11)252/2017/OR-I/E-21033]

NOAS KINDO, Under Secy.

शुि᳍ – पतर्

नई िदल् ली, 7 िदसम् बर, 2018

का. आ.1759 .—पेटर्ोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइंस (भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न) अिधिनयम, 1962

(1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उप-धारा (1) ᳇ारा पर्दत शिक्तयᲂ का पर्योग करते हुए, कᱶदर् सरकार पेटर्ोिलयम और पर्ाकृितक

गैस मंतर्ालय मᱶ भारत सरकार की अिधसूचना के का. आ. संख्या 186 िदनांक 30/01/2018, भारत के सा᳙ािहक राजपतर्

संख्या 5, िदनांक 28/01/2018 से 03/02/2018 के भाग II, धारा 3, उप-धारा (ii) मᱶ 1087-1088 पृ᳧ पर पर्कािशत, मᱶ

िन᳜िलिखत संशोधन करता है अथार्त्: —

उक्त अिधसूचना मᱶ,

"केन्दर्ीय सरकार को ऐसा पर्तीत होता है िक लोक िहत मᱶ यह आवश्यक है िक हल्दीया - बरौनी पाइपलाइन पािरयोजना के

अन्तगर्त पेटर्ोिलयम पदाथᲃ के पिरवहन हेतु पि᳟म बंगाल राज्य के हल्दीया िरफ़ाइनरी से िबहार राज्य के बरौनी िरफ़ाइनरी

तक इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड ᳇ारा पाइपलाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए;" और

"शर्ी िब᳡नाथ समाजदार, सक्षम पर्ािधकारी, इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड, (पाइपलाइन िडवीजन), 18" हिल्दया

बरौनी पर्ॉडक्ट पाइपलाइन, डाकघर – दुईल्या, आन्दुल – मौरी, मौरीगर्ाम, हावड़ा -711302 (पि᳟म बंगाल) "

संख्याᲐ और शब्दᲂ के स्थान पर,

"केन्दर्ीय सरकार को ऐसा पर्तीत होता है िक लोकिहत मᱶ यह आवश्यक िक कच्चे तेल के पिरवहन के िलए एक पाइपलाइन,

हिल्दया-बरौनी पाइपलाइन िसस्टम्स पिरयोजना के तहत, पि᳟म बंगाल राज्य मᱶ हिल्दया से िबहार राज्य मᱶ बरौनी तक,

इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड ᳇ारा पाइपलाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए" और

"शर्ी िव᳡नाथ समझदार, सक्षम पर्ािधकारी, इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड, हिल्दया-बरौनी पाइपलाइन िसस्टम्स

पिरयोजना, डाकघर – दुईल्या, आन्दुल – मौरी, मौरीगर्ाम, हावड़ा -711302 (पि᳟म बंगाल)" पढ़ा जाए।

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)22/2018-ओ.आर-I/ई-27779]

नोवस िकन् डो, अवर सिचव

6688

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ERRATUM

New Delhi, the 7th December, 2018

S.O.1759 .— In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals

pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby makes the

following amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, S. O.

number 186 dated 30/01/2018, published at page 1090 in Part II, section 3, Sub-section (ii) of the weekly Gazette of

India No.5, dated 28/01/2018 to 03/02/2018, namely:-

In the said notification, for the numbers and words,

“Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of

Petroleum Products from Haldia Refinery in the state of West Bengal to Barauni Refinery in the State of Bihar a pipeline

should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited” and

“Shri Biswanath Samajder, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Pipeline Division, 18” Haldia Barauni

Product Pipeline, P.O. Duilya, Andul-Mouri, Mourigram, Howrah-711302( West Bengal)”

the numbers and words,

“Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of

crude oil, a pipeline from Haldia in the state of West Bengal to Barauni in the State of Bihar under Haldia-Barauni

Pipeline Systems Project, should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited” and

“Shri Biswanath Samajder, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Haldia-Barauni Pipeline Systems

Project, P.O. Duilya, Andul-Mouri, Mourigram, Howrah-711302 ( West Bengal)”

shall be substituted.

[F. No. R-11025(11)22/2018-OR-I/E-27779]

NOAS KINDO, Under Secy.

शुि᳍-पतर्

नई िदल्ली, 7 िदसम् बर, 2018

का. आ.1760 .— पेटर्ोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइंस (भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न) अिधिनयम, 1962

(1962 का 50) की धारा 3 िक उप-धारा (1) ᳇ारा पर्दत शिक्तयᲂ का पर्योग करते हुए, कᱶदर् सरकार पेटर्ोिलयम और पर्ाकृितक

गैस मंतर्ालय मᱶ भारत सरकार की अिधसूचना के का. आ. संख्या 187 िदनांक 30/01/2018, भारत के सा᳙ािहक राजपतर्

संख्या 5, िदनांक 28/01/2018 से 03/02/2018 के भाग II, धारा 3, उपधारा (ii) मᱶ 1092 पृ᳧ पर पर्कािशत, मᱶ

िन᳜िलिखत संशोधन करता है अथार्त्: -

उक्त अिधसूचना मᱶ,

"केन्दर्ीय सरकार को ऐसा पर्तीत होता है िक लोक िहत मᱶ यह आवश्यक है िक हल्दीया - बरौनी पाइपलाइन पािरयोजना के

अन्तगर्त पेटर्ोिलयम पदाथᲃ के पिरवहन हेतु पि᳟म बंगाल राज्य के हल्दीया िरफ़ाइनरी से िबहार राज्य के बरौनी िरफ़ाइनरी

तक इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड ᳇ारा पाइपलाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए; "और

"शर्ी िब᳡नाथ समाजदार, सक्षम पर्ािधकारी, इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड, (पाइपलाइन िडवीजन), 18" हिल्दया

बरौनी पर्ॉडक्ट पाइपलाइन, डाकघर – दुईल्या, आन्दुल – मौरी, मौरीगर्ाम, हावड़ा -711302 (पि᳟म बंगाल) "

संख्याᲐ और शब्दᲂ के स्थान पर,

"केन्दर्ीय सरकार को ऐसा पर्तीत होता है िक लोकिहत मᱶ यह आवश्यक िक कच्चे तेल के पिरवहन के िलए एक पाइपलाइन,

हिल्दया-बरौनी पाइपलाइन िसस्टम्स पिरयोजना के तहत, पि᳟म बंगाल राज्य मᱶ हिल्दया से िबहार राज्य मᱶ बरौनी तक,

इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड ᳇ारा पाइपलाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए" और

"शर्ी िव᳡नाथ समझदार, सक्षम पर्ािधकारी, इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड, हिल्दया-बरौनी पाइपलाइन िसस्टम्स

पिरयोजना, डाकघर – दुईल्या, आन्दुल – मौरी, मौरीगर्ाम, हावड़ा -711302 (पि᳟म बंगाल)"

पढ़ा जाए।

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)22/2018-ओ.आर-I/ई-27779]

नोवस िकन् डो, अवर सिचव

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6689

ERRATUM

New Delhi, the 7th December, 2018

S.O.1760 .—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals

pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby makes the

following amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas,

S. O. number 187 dated 30/01/2018, published at page 1152 in part II, section 3, sub-section (ii) of the weekly Gazette of

India No. 5, dated 28/01/2018 to 03/02/2018, namely:-

In the said notification, for the numbers and words,

“Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of

Petroleum Products from Haldia Refinery in the state of West Bengal to Barauni Refinery in the State of Bihar a pipeline

should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited” and

“Shri Biswanath Samajder, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Pipeline Division, 18” Haldia Barauni

Product Pipeline, P.O. Duilya, Andul-Mouri, Mourigram, Howrah-711302 (West Bengal)”

the numbers and words,

“Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of

crude oil, a pipeline from Haldia in the state of West Bengal to Barauni in the State of Bihar under Haldia-Barauni

Pipeline Systems Project, should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited” and

“Shri Biswanath Samajder, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Haldia-Barauni Pipeline Systems

Project, P.O. Duilya, Andul-Mouri, Mourigram, Howrah-711302 ( West Bengal)”

shall be substituted.

[F. No. R-11025(11)22/2018-OR-I/E-27779]

NOAS KINDO, Under Secy.

शुि᳍ – पतर्

नई िदल् ली, 7 िदसम् बर, 2018

का. आ.1761.—पेटर्ोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइंस (भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न) अिधिनयम, 1962

(1962 का 50) की धारा 3 िक उप धारा (1) ᳇ारा पर्दत शिक्तयᲂ का पर्योग करते हुए, कᱶदर् सरकार पेटर्ोिलयम और पर्ाकृितक

गैस मंतर्ालय मᱶ भारत सरकार की अिधसूचना के का. आ. संख्या 184 िदनांक 30/01/2018, भारत के सा᳙ािहक राजपतर्

संख्या 5, िदनांक 28/01/2018 से 03/02/2018 के भाग II, धारा 3, उपधारा (ii) मᱶ 943 पृ᳧ पर पर्कािशत, मᱶ िन᳜िलिखत

संशोधन करता है अथार्त्: -

उक्त अिधसूचना मᱶ,

"केन्दर्ीय सरकार को ऐसा पर्तीत होता है िक लोकिहत मᱶ यह आवश्यक है िक हल्दीया - बरौनी पाइपलाइन पािरयोजना के

अन्तगर्त पेटर्ोिलयम पदाथᲃ के पिरवहन हेतु पि᳟म बंगाल राज्य के हल्दीया िरफ़ाइनरी से िबहार राज्य के बरौनी िरफ़ाइनरी

तक इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड ᳇ारा पाइपलाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए; "और

"शर्ी िब᳡नाथ समाजदार, सक्षम पर्ािधकारी, इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड, (पाइपलाइन िडवीजन), 18" हिल्दया

बरौनी पर्ॉडक्ट पाइपलाइन, डाकघर – दुईल्या, आन्दुल – मौरी, मौरीगर्ाम, हावड़ा -711302 (पि᳟म बंगाल) "

संख्याᲐ और शब्दᲂ के स्थान पर,

6690

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

"केन्दर्ीय सरकार को ऐसा पर्तीत होता है िक लोकिहत मᱶ यह आवश्यक की कच्चे तेल के पिरवहन के िलए एक पाइपलाइन,

हिल्दया-बरौनी पाइपलाइन िसस्टम्स पिरयोजना के तहत, पि᳟म बंगाल राज्य मᱶ हिल्दया से िबहार राज्य मᱶ बरौनी तक,

इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड ᳇ारा पाइपलाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए "और

"शर्ी िव᳡नाथ समझदार, सक्षम पर्ािधकारी, इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड, हिल्दया-बरौनी पाइपलाइन िसस्टम्स

पिरयोजना, डाकघर – दुईल्या, आन्दुल – मौरी, मौरीगर्ाम, हावड़ा -711302 (पि᳟म बंगाल) "

पढ़ा जाए।

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)22/2018-ओ.आर-I/ई-27779]

नोवस िकन् डो, अवर सिचव

ERRATUM

New Delhi, 7th December, 2018

S.O.1761 .—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals

pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby makes the

following amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas,

S. O. number 184 dated 30/01/2018, published at pages 996-997 in part II, section 3, sub-section (ii) of the weekly

Gazette of India No.5, dated 28/01/2018 to 03/02/2018, namely:-

In the said notification, for the numbers and words,

“Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of

Petroleum Products from Haldia Refinery in the State of West Bengal to Barauni Refinery in the State of Bihar a pipeline

should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited” and

“Shri Biswanath Samajder, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Pipeline Division, 18” Haldia Barauni

Product Pipeline, P.O. Duilya, Andul-Mouri, Mourigram, Howrah-711302( West Bengal)”

the numbers and words,

“Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of

crude oil, a pipeline from Haldia in the State of West Bengal to Barauni in the State of Bihar under Haldia-Barauni

Pipeline Systems Project, should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited” and

“Shri Biswanath Samajder, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Haldia-Barauni Pipeline Systems

Project, P.O. Duilya, Andul-Mouri, Mourigram, Howrah-711302 ( West Bengal)”

shall be substituted.

[F. No. R-11025(11)22/2018-OR-I/E-27779]

NOAS KINDO, Under Secy.

शुि᳍ – पतर्

नई िदल् ली, 7 िदसम् बर, 2018

का. आ.1762.— पेटर्ोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइंस (भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न) अिधिनयम, 1962

(1962 का 50) की धारा 3 िक उप धारा (1) ᳇ारा पर्दत शिक्तयᲂ का पर्योग करते हुए, कᱶदर् सरकार पेटर्ोिलयम और पर्ाकृितक

गैस मंतर्ालय मᱶ भारत सरकार की अिधसूचना के का. आ. संख्या 185 िदनांक 30/01/2018, भारत के सा᳙ािहक राजपतर्

संख्या 5, िदनांक 28/01/2018 से 03/02/2018 के भाग II, धारा 3, उपधारा (ii) मᱶ 1032 पृ᳧ पर पर्कािशत, मᱶ

िन᳜िलिखत संशोधन करता है, अथार्त्: -

उक्त अिधसूचना मᱶ,

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6691

"केन्दर्ीय सरकार को ऐसा पर्तीत होता है िक लोक िहत मᱶ यह आवश्यक है िक हल्दीया - बरौनी पाइपलाइन पिरयोजना के

अन्तगर्त पेटर्ोिलयम पदाथᲃ के पिरवहन हेतु पि᳟म बंगाल राज्य के हल्दीया िरफ़ाइनरी से िबहार राज्य के बरौनी िरफ़ाइनरी

तक इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड ᳇ारा पाइपलाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए; " और

"शर्ी िब᳡नाथ समाजदार, सक्षम पर्ािधकारी, इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड, (पाइपलाइन िडवीजन), 18" हिल्दया

बरौनी पर्ॉडक्ट पाइपलाइन, डाकघर – दुईल्या, आन्दुल – मौरी, मौरीगर्ाम, हावड़ा -711302 (पि᳟म बंगाल) "

संख्याᲐ और शब्दᲂ के स्थान पर,

"केन्दर्ीय सरकार को ऐसा पर्तीत होता है िक लोकिहत मᱶ यह आवश्यक िक कच्चे तेल के पिरवहन के िलए एक पाइपलाइन,

हिल्दया-बरौनी पाइपलाइन िसस्टम्स पिरयोजना के तहत, पि᳟म बंगाल राज्य मᱶ हिल्दया से िबहार राज्य मᱶ बरौनी तक,

इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड ᳇ारा पाइपलाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए " और

"शर्ी िव᳡नाथ समझदार, सक्षम पर्ािधकारी, इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड, हिल्दया-बरौनी पाइपलाइन िसस्टम

िसस्टम्स, डाकघर – दुईल्या, आन्दुल – मौरी, मौरीगर्ाम, हावड़ा -711302 (पि᳟म बंगाल)"

पढ़ा जाए।

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)22/2018-ओ.आर-I/ई-27779]

नोवस िकन् डो, अवर सिचव

ERRATUM

New Delhi, the 7th December, 2018

S. O.1762 .—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals

pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby makes the

following amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas,

S. O. number 185 dated 30/01/2018, published at page 1065 in Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii) of the weekly Gazette

of India No. 5, dated 28/01/2018 to 03/02/2018, namely:-

In the said notification, for the numbers and words,

“Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of

Petroleum Products from Haldia Refinery in the State of West Bengal to Barauni Refinery in the State of Bihar a pipeline

should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited” and

“Shri Biswanath Samajder, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Pipeline Division, 18” Haldia Barauni

Product Pipeline, P.O. Duilya, Andul-Mouri, Mourigram, Howrah-711302 (West Bengal)”

the numbers and words,

“Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of

crude oil, a pipeline from Haldia in the State of West Bengal to Barauni in the State of Bihar under Haldia-Barauni

Pipeline Systems Project, should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited” and

“Shri Biswanath Samajder, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Haldia-Barauni Pipeline Systems

Project, P.O. Duilya, Andul-Mouri, Mourigram, Howrah-711302 ( West Bengal)”

shall be substituted.

[F. No. R-11025(11)22/2018/OR-I/E-27779]

NOAS KINDO, Under Secy.

6692

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

शुि᳍ – पतर्

नई िदल् ली, 7 िदसम् बर, 2018

का. आ.1763.—पेटर्ोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइंस (भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न) अिधिनयम, 1962

(1962 का 50) की धारा 3 िक उप धारा (1) ᳇ारा पर्दत शिक्तयᲂ का पर्योग करते हुए, कᱶदर् सरकार पेटर्ोिलयम और पर्ाकृितक

गैस मंतर्ालय मᱶ भारत सरकार की अिधसूचना के का. आ. संख्या 2846 िदनांक 31/10/2017, भारत के सा᳙ािहक राजपतर्

संख्या 51, िदनांक 17/12/2017 से 23/12/2017 के भाग II, धारा 3, उपधारा (ii) मᱶ 9526 पृ᳧ पर पर्कािशत, मᱶ

िन᳜िलिखत संशोधन करता है अथार्त्: -

उक्त अिधसूचना मᱶ,

"केन्दर्ीय सरकार को लोक िहत मे यह आवश्यक पर्तीत होता है िक पि᳟म बंगाल राज्य के हलिदया रीफ़ीनेरी से िबहार राज्य

के बरौनी तक इंिडयन ऑइल कापᲃरेशन िलिमटेड ᳇ारा एक पाइप लाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए;" और

"शर्ी अजय िसह बड़ाईक (झा. पर्. से.) सक्षम पर्ािधकारी, भूिम अजर्न अिधकारी, इंिडयन ऑइल कापᲃरेशन िलिमटेड, परदीप

हल्दीया दुगार्पुर एल॰ पी॰ जी॰ पाइप लाइन आगमेटᱶशन एवं 18” हल्दीया – बरौनी पर्ॉडक्ट पाइप लाइन पिरयोजना, देवघर

पैलस, तीसरा तल, वी॰ आई॰ पी॰ चौक देवघर – 814112 (झारखंड) "।

संख्याᲐ और शब्दᲂ के स्थान पर,

"केन्दर्ीय सरकार को ऐसा पर्तीत होता है िक लोक िहत मᱶ यह आवश्यक िक कच्चे तेल के पिरवहन के िलए एक पाइपलाइन,

हिल्दया-बरौनी पाइपलाइन िसस्टम्स पिरयोजना के तहत, पि᳟म बंगाल राज्य मᱶ हिल्दया से िबहार राज्य मᱶ बरौनी तक,

इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड ᳇ारा पाइपलाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए " और

"शर्ी अजय िसह बड़ाईक (झा. पर्. से.), सक्षम पर्ािधकारी, इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड, हिल्दया-बरौनी पाइपलाइन

िसस्टम पर्ोजेक्ट, देवघर पैलेस, तीसरा तल, वी॰आई॰पी चौक, देवघर -814112 (झारखंड)" ।

पढ़ा जाए।

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)21/2018-ओ.आर-I/ई-27764]

नोवस िकन् डो, अवर सिचव

ERRATUM

New Delhi, the 7th December, 2018

S.O.1763 .— In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals

pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby makes the

following amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas,

S. O. number 2846 dated 31/10/17, published at page 9571 in Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii) of the weekly Gazette of

India No. 51, dated 17/12/17 to 23/12/17, namely:-

In the said notification, for the numbers and words,

“Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of

Petroleum Products from Haldia Refinery in the State of West Bengal to Barauni Refinery in the State of Bihar a pipeline

should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited” and

“Shri Ajay Singh Baraik, JAS, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Pipeline Division, Augmentation

of Paradip Haldia Durgapur LPG Pipeline, And 18” Haldia Barauni Product Pipeline Projects, Pipeline, “Deoghar

Palace”,3rd Floor ,VIP Chowk, Deoghar-814112 (Jharkhand)”.

the numbers and words,

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6693

“Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of

crude oil, a pipeline from Haldia in the State of West Bengal to Barauni in the State of Bihar under Haldia-Barauni

Pipeline Systems Project, should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited” and

“Shri Ajay Singh Baraik, JAS, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Haldia-Barauni Pipeline Systems

Project, Deoghar Palace, 3rd Floor , VIP Chowk,Deoghar-814112 (Jharkhand)”

shall be substituted.

[F. No. R-11025(11)21/2018/OR-I/E-27764]

NOAS KINDO, Under Secy.

शुि᳍–पतर्

नई िदल् ली, 7 िदसम् बर, 2018

का. आ.1764.—पेटर्ोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइंस (भूिम मे उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न) अिधिनयम, 1962

(1962 का 50) की धारा 3 िक उप धारा (1) ᳇ारा पर्दत शिक्तयᲂ का पर्योग करते हुए, कᱶदर् सरकार पेटर्ोिलयम और पर्ाकृितक

गैस मंतर्ालय मᱶ भारत सरकार की अिधसूचना के का. आ. संख्या 2845 िदनांक 31/10/2017, भारत के सा᳙ािहक राजपतर्

संख्या 51, िदनांक 17/12/2017 से 23/12/2017 के भाग II, धारा 3, उपधारा (ii) मᱶ 9426 पृ᳧ पर पर्कािशत, मᱶ

िन᳜िलिखत संशोधन करता है अथार्त्: -

उक्त अिधसूचना मᱶ,

" केन्दर्ीय सरकार को लोकिहत मे यह आवश्यक पर्तीत होता है िक पि᳟म बंगाल राज्य के हलिदया रीफ़ीनेरी से िबहार राज्य

के बरौनी तक इंिडयन ऑइल कापᲃरेशन िलिमटेड ᳇ारा एक पाइप लाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए;" और

"शर्ी अजय िसह बड़ाईक (झा. पर्. से.) सक्षम पर्ािधकारी, भूिम अजर्न अिधकारी, इंिडयन ऑइल कापᲃरेशन िलिमटेड, परदीप

हल्दीया दुगार्पुर एल॰ पी॰ जी॰ पाइप लाइन आगमेटᱶशन एवं 18” हल्दीया – बरौनी पर्ॉडक्ट पाइप लाइन पिरयोजना, देवघर

पैलस, तीसरा तल, वी॰ आई॰ पी॰ चौक देवघर – 814112 (झारखंड) "।

संख्याᲐ और शब्दᲂ के स्थान पर,

"केन्दर्ीय सरकार को ऐसा पर्तीत होता है िक लोकिहत मᱶ यह आवश्यक िक कच्चे तेल के पिरवहन के िलए एक पाइपलाइन,

हिल्दया-बरौनी पाइपलाइन िसस्टम्स पिरयोजना के तहत, पि᳟म बंगाल राज्य मᱶ हिल्दया से िबहार राज्य मᱶ बरौनी तक,

इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड ᳇ारा पाइपलाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए " और

"शर्ी अजय िसह बड़ाईक (झा॰ पर्॰ से॰), सक्षम पर्ािधकारी, इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपᲃरेशन िलिमटेड, हिल्दया-बरौनी पाइपलाइन

िसस्टम पर्ोजेक्ट, देवघर पैलेस, तीसरा तल, वी. आई. पी. चौक, देवघर -814112 (झारखंड)" ।

पढ़ा जाए।

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)21/2018-ओ.आर-I/ई-27764]

नोवस िकन् डो, अवर सिचव

6694

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ERRATUM

New Delhi, the 7th December, 2018

S.O.1764 .—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals

pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby makes the

following amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas,

S.O. number 2845 dated 31/10/17, published at page 9487 in Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii) of the weekly Gazette of

India No. 51, dated 17/12/17 to 23/12/17, namely:-

In the said notification, for the numbers and words,

“Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of

Petroleum Products from Haldia Refinery in the State of West Bengal to Barauni Refinery in the State of Bihar a pipeline

should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited” and

“Shri Ajay Singh Baraik, JAS, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Pipeline Division, Augmentation

of Paradip Haldia Durgapur LPG Pipeline, And 18” Haldia Barauni Product Pipeline Projects, Pipeline, “Deoghar

Palace”,3rd Floor ,VIP Chowk,Deoghar-814112 (Jharkhand)”.

the numbers and words,

“Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of

crude oil, a pipeline from Haldia in the State of West Bengal to Barauni in the State of Bihar under Haldia-Barauni

Pipeline Systems Project, should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited” and

“Shri Ajay Singh Baraik , JAS, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Haldia-Barauni Pipeline Systems

Project, Deoghar Palace, 3rd Floor ,VIP Chowk, Deoghar-814112 (Jharkhand)” .

shall be substituted.

[F. No. R-11025(11)21/2018/OR-I/E-27764]

NOAS KINDO, Under Secy.

नई िदल्ली, 11 िदसम् बर, 2018

का. आ.1765.—केन्दर्ीय सरकार को लोकिहत मᱶ यह आवश्यक पर्तीत होता है िक उᱫर पर्देश राज्य मᱶ टूण्डला

टिमनल से कानपुर टिमनल तक पेटर्ोिलयम उत्पादᲂ के पिरवहन के िलये इंिडयन ऑयलकापᲃरेशन िलिमटेड ᳇ारा पाइपलाइन

िबछाई जानी चािहए।

और केन्दर्ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन िबछाने के पर्योजन के िलये यह आवश्यक पर्तीत होता है िक ऐसी भूिम मᱶ

जो इस से उपाब᳍ अनुसूची मे विणत है, और िजसमᱶ उक्त पाइपलाइन िबछाई जाने का पर्स्ताव है, उपयोग के अिधकार का

अजर्न िकया जाए ।

अतः अब, केन्दर्ीय सरकार, पेटर्ोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न) अिधिनयम,

1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1) ᳇ारा पर्दᱫ शिक्तयो का पर्योग करते हुए उस भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार

का अजर्न करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ।

कोई ᳞िक्त, जो उक्त अनुसूची मᱶ विणत भूिम मᱶ िहतब᳍ है, उस तारीख से, िजसको इस अिधसूचना मᱶ युक्त भारत

के राजपतर् की पर्ितयाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हᱹ, इक्कीस िदन के भीतर, भूिम के नीचे पाइपलाइन िबछाए

जाने के िलए उसमᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार के संबंध मᱶ सक्षम पर्ािधकारी, इंिडयन ऑयल कापᲃरेशन िलिमटेड पाइपलाइन्स

पर्भाग, िनमार्ण कायार्लय, उᱫरी क्षेतर् पाइपलाइन्स, टूण्डला - गौिरया पाइपलाइन पिरयोजना, ई-160, पर्थम व ि᳇तीय तल,

कमला नगर, आगरा (यू.पी.) – 282004 को िलिखत रूप मᱶ आक्षेप भेज सकेगा।

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6695

अनुसूची

तह्सील – ताखा

िजला – इटावा

राज्य – उᱫर पर्देश

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

1.

आढरपुर

229

00

00

38

227

00

23

13

219

00

04

14

218

00

08

94

214

00

01

67

215

00

04

97

210

00

02

55

209

00

06

57

208

00

05

13

195

00

05

56

201

00

12

02

200

00

00

87

199

00

02

16

202

00

02

41

259

00

03

16

260

00

01

66

258

00

44

99

264

00

01

86

265

00

08

36

269

00

08

11

268

00

01

69

270

00

07

95

271

00

04

77

273

00

11

15

6696

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

आढरपुर

285

00

09

49

276

00

07

82

284

00

34

89

283

00

01

94

282

00

12

48

401

00

23

11

446

00

15

87

453

00

00

10

447

00

00

10

451

00

00

92

452

00

08

88

459

00

14

24

457

00

01

54

458

00

02

33

460

00

01

78

471

00

02

36

472

00

00

10

473

00

08

96

474

00

10

03

477

00

10

81

478

00

06

67

482

00

06

89

483

00

03

84

485

00

13

35

487

00

01

04

2.

रौरा

1094

00

02

18

1093

00

02

50

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6697

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

रौरा

1092

00

05

78

1090

00

00

28

1091

00

00

28

1089

00

14

25

1082

00

00

25

1083

00

16

54

1084

00

00

53

1079

00

00

37

1080

00

03

67

1075

00

17

33

1055

00

13

58

1054

00

08

58

1053

00

00

22

1042

00

01

91

1041

00

00

50

1040

00

00

21

1045

00

07

91

1038

00

12

64

1018

00

04

64

1014

00

20

81

1015

00

00

58

1003

00

00

36

997

00

00

10

1000

00

01

17

999

00

01

35

996

00

04

20

973

00

00

23

6698

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

रौरा

972

00

08

99

971

00

12

41

970

00

06

28

969

00

06

52

968

00

13

50

967

00

02

25

943

00

01

50

942

00

15

74

941

00

00

37

923

00

21

88

921

00

06

97

920

00

12

92

1469

00

01

17

1471

00

16

15

1556

00

03

42

1554

00

16

00

1557

00

04

02

1553

00

11

11

1558

00

06

30

1552

00

00

99

1598

00

05

26

1599

00

22

61

1600

00

00

27

1601

00

25

39

1588

00

00

57

1589

00

00

10

1585

00

00

10

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6699

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

रौरा (जारी)

1584

00

07

21

1583

00

01

12

1581

00

03

21

1582

00

02

15

1579

00

10

61

1580

00

00

39

1639

00

06

93

1640

00

07

22

1642

00

08

36

1643

00

13

21

1772

00

15

51

1777

00

09

84

1771

00

00

16

1769

00

00

10

1766

00

00

10

1778

00

00

10

1765

00

03

02

1780

00

05

72

1763

00

01

06

2084

00

05

07

2159

00

20

93

2157

00

00

17

2156

00

03

91

2125

00

15

76

2127

00

45

85

2146

00

00

89

2103

00

00

57

6700

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

रौरा

2102

00

00

10

2101

00

16

37

2131

00

00

36

3.

ककराही

414

00

00

88

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)20/2018-ओ.आर-I/ई-27595]

नोवस िकन् डो, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 11th December, 2018

S.O. 1765.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the

transportation of petroleum products from Tundla Terminal to Kanpur Terminal should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation

Limited. And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is

necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and

Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby

declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty–one days from the date on

which the copies of this notification, as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the General Public, object

in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under the land to Competent Authority,

Indian Oil Corporation Limited (Pipelines Division), Construction Office, Northern Region Pipelines, Tundla-Gawria

Pipeline Project, E-160,1st & 2nd floor, Kamlanagar, Agra (U.P.) – 282 004.

SCHEDULE

Tehsil:- Takha

District :- Etawah

State :- Uttar Pradesh

Sl. No.

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

1.

Aadharpur

229

00

00

38

227

00

23

13

219

00

04

14

218

00

08

94

214

00

01

67

215

00

04

97

210

00

02

55

209

00

06

57

208

00

05

13

195

00

05

56

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6701

Sl. No.

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

Aadharpur (Contd.)

201

00

12

02

200

00

00

87

199

00

02

16

202

00

02

41

259

00

03

16

260

00

01

66

258

00

44

99

264

00

01

86

265

00

08

36

269

00

08

11

268

00

01

69

270

00

07

95

271

00

04

77

273

00

11

15

285

00

09

49

276

00

07

82

284

00

34

89

283

00

01

94

282

00

12

48

401

00

23

11

446

00

15

87

453

00

00

10

447

00

00

10

451

00

00

92

452

00

08

88

459

00

14

24

457

00

01

54

458

00

02

33

460

00

01

78

471

00

02

36

472

00

00

10

473

00

08

96

474

00

10

03

6702

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Sl. No.

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

Aadharpur

477

00

10

81

478

00

06

67

482

00

06

89

483

00

03

84

485

00

13

35

487

00

01

04

2.

Raura

1094

00

02

18

1093

00

02

50

1092

00

05

78

1090

00

00

28

1091

00

00

28

1089

00

14

25

1082

00

00

25

1083

00

16

54

1084

00

00

53

1079

00

00

37

1080

00

03

67

1075

00

17

33

1055

00

13

58

1054

00

08

58

1053

00

00

22

1042

00

01

91

1041

00

00

50

1040

00

00

21

1045

00

07

91

1038

00

12

64

1018

00

04

64

1014

00

20

81

1015

00

00

58

1003

00

00

36

997

00

00

10

1000

00

01

17

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6703

Sl. No.

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

Raura

999

00

01

35

996

00

04

20

973

00

00

23

972

00

08

99

971

00

12

41

970

00

06

28

969

00

06

52

968

00

13

50

967

00

02

25

943

00

01

50

942

00

15

74

941

00

00

37

923

00

21

88

921

00

06

97

920

00

12

92

1469

00

01

17

1471

00

16

15

1556

00

03

42

1554

00

16

00

1557

00

04

02

1553

00

11

11

1558

00

06

30

1552

00

00

99

1598

00

05

26

1599

00

22

61

1600

00

00

27

1601

00

25

39

1588

00

00

57

1589

00

00

10

1585

00

00

10

1584

00

07

21

1583

00

01

12

6704

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Sl. No.

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

Raura

1581

00

03

21

1582

00

02

15

1579

00

10

61

1580

00

00

39

1639

00

06

93

1640

00

07

22

1642

00

08

36

1643

00

13

21

1772

00

15

51

1777

00

09

84

1771

00

00

16

1769

00

00

10

1766

00

00

10

1778

00

00

10

1765

00

03

02

1780

00

05

72

1763

00

01

06

2084

00

05

07

2159

00

20

93

2157

00

00

17

2156

00

03

91

2125

00

15

76

2127

00

45

85

2146

00

00

89

2103

00

00

57

2102

00

00

10

2101

00

16

37

2131

00

00

36

3.

Kakrahi

414

00

00

88

[F. No. R-11025(11)20/2018/OR-I/E-27595]

NOAS KINDO, Under Secy.

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6705

नई िदल्ली, 11 िदसम् बर, 2018

का. आ. 1766.— केन्दर्ीय सरकार को लोकिहत मᱶ यह आवश्यक पर्तीत होता है िक उᱫर पर्देश राज्य मᱶ टूण्डला

टिमनल से कानपुर टिमनल तक पेटर्ोिलयम उत्पादᲂ के पिरवहन के िलये इंिडयन ऑयल कापᲃरेशन िलिमटेड ᳇ारा पाइपलाइन

िबछाई जानी चािहए।

और केन्दर्ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन िबछाने के पर्योजन के िलये यह आवश्यक पर्तीत होता है िक ऐसी भूिम मᱶ

जो इससे उपाब᳍ अनुसूची मᱶ विणत है, और िजसमᱶ उक्त पाइपलाइन िबछाई जाने का पर्स्ताव है, उपयोग के अिधकार का

अजर्न िकया जाए ।

अतः अब, केन्दर्ीय सरकार, पेटर्ोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न) अिधिनयम,

1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1) ᳇ारा पर्दᱫ शिक्तयᲂ का पर्योग करते हुए उस भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार

का अजर्न करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ।

कोई ᳞िक्त, जो उक्त अनुसूची मᱶ विणत भूिम मᱶ िहतब᳍ है , उस तारीख से, िजसको इस अिधसूचना मᱶ युक्त भारत

के राजपतर् की पर्ितयाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हᱹ, इक्कीस िदन के भीतर, भूिम के नीचे पाइपलाइन िबछाए

जाने के िलए उसमᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार के संबंध मᱶ सक्षम पर्ािधकारी, इंिडयन ऑयल कापᲃरेशन िलिमटेड पाइपलाइन्स

पर्भाग, िनमार्ण कायार्लय, उᱫरी क्षेतर् पाइपलाइन्स, टूण्डला - गौिरया पाइपलाइन पिरयोजना, ई-160, पर्थम व ि᳇तीय तल,

कमला नगर, आगरा (यू.पी.) – 282004 को िलिखत रूप मᱶ आक्षेप भेज सकेगा।

अनुसूची

तहसील – भरथना

िजला – इटावा

राज्य – उᱫर पर्देश

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1.

नगला बहादुरपुर

132

00

04

06

134

00

01

76

142

00

15

18

133

00

00

49

141

00

05

28

143

00

03

66

144

00

00

20

151

00

00

82

153

00

00

44

166

00

01

99

165

00

03

27

167

00

00

17

नगला बहादुरपुर

169

00

00

24

170

00

12

68

161

00

04

04

6706

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

160

00

05

82

159

00

24

03

158

00

00

10

388

00

02

95

387

00

07

08

384

00

00

51

383

00

15

02

395

00

18

54

407

00

00

10

405

00

00

10

408

00

00

60

410

00

00

10

406

00

00

20

396

00

00

49

401

00

02

99

403

00

13

18

404

00

05

73

412

00

00

61

413

00

07

40

414

00

00

24

417

00

01

94

425

00

00

84

423

00

02

61

419

00

04

23

नगला बहादुरपुर

420

00

04

55

422

00

10

38

2.

सैफी

1400

00

00

28

1397

00

00

10

1405

00

05

06

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6707

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1406

00

06

81

1407

00

01

40

1411

00

11

33

1412

00

03

90

1417

00

06

05

1419

00

00

37

1424

00

08

61

1432

00

01

17

1431

00

07

29

1429

00

00

21

1430

00

09

96

1459

00

00

36

1453

00

27

40

1454

00

03

59

1455

00

03

64

1477

00

03

43

1476

00

03

77

1475

00

05

49

1482

00

01

36

1485

00

10

90

1515

00

00

72

1514

00

07

45

सैफी

1512

00

04

98

1511

00

05

99

1510

00

07

85

1501

00

17

55

1500

00

11

02

1499

00

00

33

1539

00

17

37

6708

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1542

00

00

38

1540

00

00

24

1544

00

16

76

1564

00

00

77

1543

00

01

71

1563

00

01

41

1497

00

02

91

1562

00

00

18

1566

00

07

47

1567

00

03

47

1560

00

00

36

1559

00

02

65

1570

00

01

99

1576

00

00

11

1571

00

01

93

1575

00

02

72

1573

00

03

24

1574

00

00

50

1583

00

06

71

1585

00

06

30

सैफी

1584

00

00

10

1590

00

01

46

1589

00

07

92

1593

00

01

93

1594

00

02

24

3.

नगला बुटहर

155

00

02

88

157

00

04

55

156

00

02

51

153

00

00

10

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6709

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

152

00

00

10

4.

अदलीपुर

300

00

28

06

299

00

00

70

306

00

00

40

309

00

00

10

294

00

01

59

307

00

15

25

308

00

00

19

314

00

00

10

291

00

00

10

292

00

03

31

293

00

09

07

164

00

04

74

74

00

15

83

73

00

00

33

67

00

00

29

160

00

00

61

77

00

30

13

अदलीपुर

78

00

00

15

108

00

22

53

109

00

00

39

114

00

27

54

115

00

06

75

113

00

01

30

148

00

00

36

5.

गंसरा

123

00

04

29

126

00

07

33

129

00

10

65

130

00

03

01

6710

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

131

00

03

39

132

00

06

74

116

00

00

10

117

00

02

22

133

00

06

32

134

00

05

51

135

00

20

19

136

00

10

30

115

00

07

12

137

00

20

11

139

00

13

50

145

00

00

34

146

00

14

98

149

00

01

12

151

00

00

10

160

00

12

22

गंसरा

159

00

11

26

152

00

00

60

156

00

00

87

153

00

07

96

154

00

07

20

438

00

12

07

439

00

02

32

434

00

00

10

433

00

00

33

440

00

03

70

651

00

01

49

656

00

18

94

663

00

00

10

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6711

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

669

00

00

38

649

00

10

52

648

00

05

24

647

00

04

22

646

00

02

04

645

00

03

16

644

00

07

92

643

00

05

57

695

00

00

11

694

00

16

81

697

00

09

36

696

00

00

19

699

00

00

43

1360

00

07

38

गंसरा

1359

00

08

40

1358

00

00

69

1339

00

00

10

1342

00

04

47

1340

00

00

24

1341

00

00

37

1335

00

12

93

1334

00

00

82

1337

00

00

10

1336

00

04

38

1308

00

07

21

1307

00

00

63

1309

00

00

68

1305

00

01

42

1494

00

00

11

6712

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1495

00

04

23

1498

00

07

28

1507

00

12

69

1508

00

00

34

1516

00

00

32

1528

00

06

58

1529

00

06

26

1525

00

00

17

1533

00

02

25

1535

00

00

10

1524

00

02

77

1523

00

02

41

गंसरा

1542

00

13

81

1558

00

00

36

1559

00

23

59

1557

00

00

39

1561

00

03

15

1555

00

00

10

1821

00

27

44

1820

00

01

53

1822

00

06

90

1857

00

11

06

1848

00

05

31

1847

00

05

39

1846

00

00

82

1845

00

17

82

1839

00

18

03

1925

00

20

61

1926

00

00

61

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6713

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1927

00

00

77

1930

00

22

52

1973

00

01

66

1931

00

00

10

1922

00

00

39

1921

00

00

73

1920

00

22

19

1919

00

06

52

1974

00

09

66

1975

00

00

41

गंसरा

1977

00

03

28

1976

00

11

18

1978

00

04

21

1980

00

03

90

1981

00

01

88

1979

00

01

85

1981

00

01

02

1985

00

00

50

6.

ढकपुरा

3699

00

15

84

3700

00

06

13

3708

00

04

72

3707

00

15

99

3744

00

38

00

3706

00

02

74

3745

00

18

46

3748

00

15

74

3749

00

38

03

3752

00

07

27

4088

00

08

42

6714

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

4089

00

04

33

4090

00

04

08

4091

00

07

05

4093

00

05

45

4094

00

40

29

4120

00

30

14

4123

00

00

33

4126

00

05

68

ढकपुरा

4128

00

04

63

4129

00

05

34

4131

00

00

28

4132

00

08

06

4133

00

08

85

4135

00

07

39

4136

00

07

23

4137

00

09

62

4138

00

29

26

4140

00

25

33

4139

00

01

68

4165

00

02

31

4166

00

03

21

4168

00

15

39

4167

00

12

58

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)20/2018-ओ.आर-I/ई-27595]

नोवस िकन् डो, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 11h December, 2018

S.O. 1766.— Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for

the transportation of petroleum products from Tundla Terminal to Kanpur Terminal should be laid by Indian Oil

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6715

Corporation Limited. And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline,

it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals

Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land ) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its

intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty–one days from the date on which the

copies of this notification, as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the General Public, object in writing

to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under the land to Competent Authority, Indian Oil

Corporation Limited (Pipelines Division), Construction Office, Northern Region Pipelines, Tundla-Gawria Pipeline

Project, E-160, 1st & 2nd Floor, Kamlanagar, Agra (U.P.) – 282 004.

SCHEDULE

Tehsil: Bharthana

District: Etawah

State : Uttar Pradesh

Sl.

No.

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

1.

Nagla Bahadurpur

132

00

04

06

134

00

01

76

142

00

15

18

133

00

00

49

141

00

05

28

143

00

03

66

144

00

00

20

151

00

00

82

153

00

00

44

166

00

01

99

165

00

03

27

167

00

00

17

169

00

00

24

170

00

12

68

161

00

04

04

160

00

05

82

159

00

24

03

158

00

00

10

388

00

02

95

387

00

07

08

384

00

00

51

383

00

15

02

6716

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Sl.

No.

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

395

00

18

54

407

00

00

10

405

00

00

10

408

00

00

60

410

00

00

10

406

00

00

20

396

00

00

49

Nagla Bahadurpur

401

00

02

99

403

00

13

18

404

00

05

73

412

00

00

61

413

00

07

40

414

00

00

24

417

00

01

94

425

00

00

84

423

00

02

61

419

00

04

23

420

00

04

55

422

00

10

38

2.

Saiphi

1400

00

00

28

1397

00

00

10

1405

00

05

06

1406

00

06

81

1407

00

01

40

1411

00

11

33

1412

00

03

90

1417

00

06

05

1419

00

00

37

1424

00

08

61

1432

00

01

17

1431

00

07

29

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6717

Sl.

No.

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

1429

00

00

21

1430

00

09

96

1459

00

00

36

1453

00

27

40

1454

00

03

59

1455

00

03

64

1477

00

03

43

Saiphi

1476

00

03

77

1475

00

05

49

1482

00

01

36

1485

00

10

90

1515

00

00

72

1514

00

07

45

1512

00

04

98

1511

00

05

99

1510

00

07

85

1501

00

17

55

1500

00

11

02

1499

00

00

33

1539

00

17

37

1542

00

00

38

1540

00

00

24

1544

00

16

76

1564

00

00

77

1543

00

01

71

1563

00

01

41

1497

00

02

91

1562

00

00

18

1566

00

07

47

1567

00

03

47

1560

00

00

36

6718

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Sl.

No.

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

1559

00

02

65

1570

00

01

99

1576

00

00

11

1571

00

01

93

1575

00

02

72

1573

00

03

24

1574

00

00

50

Saiphi

1583

00

06

71

1585

00

06

30

1584

00

00

10

1590

00

01

46

1589

00

07

92

1593

00

01

93

1594

00

02

24

3.

Nagla Buther

155

00

02

88

157

00

4

55

156

00

02

51

153

00

00

10

152

00

00

10

4.

Adlipur

300

00

28

06

299

00

00

70

306

00

00

40

309

00

00

10

294

00

01

59

307

00

15

25

308

00

00

19

314

00

00

10

291

00

00

10

292

00

03

31

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6719

Sl.

No.

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

293

00

09

07

164

00

04

74

74

00

15

83

73

00

00

33

67

00

00

29

160

00

00

61

77

00

30

13

Adlipur

78

00

00

15

108

00

22

53

109

00

00

39

114

00

27

54

115

00

06

75

113

00

01

30

148

00

00

36

5.

Gansara

123

00

04

29

126

00

07

33

129

00

10

65

130

00

03

01

131

00

03

39

132

00

06

74

116

00

00

10

117

00

02

22

133

00

06

32

134

00

05

51

135

00

20

19

136

00

10

30

115

00

07

12

137

00

20

11

139

00

13

50

145

00

00

34

146

00

14

98

6720

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Sl.

No.

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

149

00

01

12

151

00

00

10

160

00

12

22

159

00

11

26

152

00

00

60

156

00

00

87

153

00

07

96

Gansara

154

00

07

20

438

00

12

07

439

00

02

32

434

00

00

10

433

00

00

33

440

00

03

70

651

00

01

49

656

00

18

94

663

00

00

10

669

00

00

38

649

00

10

52

648

00

05

24

647

00

04

22

646

00

02

04

645

00

03

16

644

00

07

92

643

00

05

57

695

00

00

11

694

00

16

81

697

00

09

36

696

00

00

19

699

00

00

43

1360

00

07

38

1359

00

08

40

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6721

Sl.

No.

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

1358

00

00

69

1339

00

00

10

1342

00

04

47

1340

00

00

24

1341

00

00

37

1335

00

12

93

1334

00

00

82

Gansara

1337

00

00

10

1336

00

04

38

1308

00

07

21

1307

00

00

63

1309

00

00

68

1305

00

01

42

1494

00

00

11

1495

00

04

23

1498

00

07

28

1507

00

12

69

1508

00

00

34

1516

00

00

32

1528

00

06

58

1529

00

06

26

1525

00

00

17

1533

00

02

25

1535

00

00

10

1524

00

02

77

1523

00

02

41

1542

00

13

81

1558

00

00

36

1559

00

23

59

1557

00

00

39

1561

00

03

15

6722

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Sl.

No.

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

1555

00

00

10

1821

00

27

44

1820

00

01

53

1822

00

06

90

1857

00

11

06

1848

00

05

31

1847

00

05

39

Gansara

1846

00

00

82

1845

00

17

82

1839

00

18

03

1925

00

20

61

1926

00

00

61

1927

00

00

77

1930

00

22

52

1973

00

01

66

1931

00

00

10

1922

00

00

39

1921

00

00

73

1920

00

22

19

1919

00

06

52

1974

00

09

66

1975

00

00

41

1977

00

03

28

1976

00

11

18

1978

00

04

21

1980

00

03

90

1981

00

01

88

1979

00

01

85

1981

00

01

02

1985

00

00

50

6.

Dhakpura

3699

00

15

84

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6723

Sl.

No.

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

3700

00

06

13

3708

00

04

72

3707

00

15

99

3744

00

38

00

3706

00

02

74

3745

00

18

46

3748

00

15

74

Dhakpura

3749

00

38

03

3752

00

07

27

4088

00

08

42

4089

00

04

33

4090

00

04

08

4091

00

07

05

4093

00

05

45

4094

00

40

29

4120

00

30

14

4123

00

00

33

4126

00

05

68

4128

00

04

63

4129

00

05

34

4131

00

00

28

4132

00

08

06

4133

00

08

85

4135

00

07

39

4136

00

07

23

4137

00

09

62

4138

00

29

26

4140

00

25

33

4139

00

01

68

4165

00

02

31

4166

00

03

21

6724

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Sl.

No.

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

4168

00

15

39

4167

00

12

58

[F. No. R-11025(11)20/2018/OR-I/E-27895]

NOAS KINDO, Under Secy.

नई िदल्ली, 11 िदसम् बर, 2018

का. आ. 1767.—केन्दर्ीय सरकार को लोकिहत मᱶ यह आवश्यक पर्तीत होता है िक उᱫर पर्देश राज्य मᱶ टूण्डला

टिमनल से कानपुर टिमनल तक पेटर्ोिलयम उत्पादᲂ के पिरवहन के िलये इंिडयन ऑयल कापᲃरेशन िलिमटेड ᳇ारा पाइपलाइन

िबछाई जानी चािहए।

और केन्दर्ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन िबछाने के पर्योजन के िलये यह आवश्यक पर्तीत होता है िक ऐसी भूिम मᱶ

जो इस से उपाब᳍ अनुसूची मे विणत है, और िजसमᱶ उक्त पाइपलाइन िबछाई जाने का पर्स्ताव है, उपयोग के अिधकार का

अजर्न िकया जाए ।

अतः अब, केन्दर्ीय सरकार, पेटर्ोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूिम मे उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न) अिधिनयम,

1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1) ᳇ारा पर्दᱫ शिक्तयो का पर्योग करते हुए उस भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार

का अजर्न करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ।

कोई ᳞िक्त, जो उक्त अनुसूची मᱶ विणत भूिम मᱶ िहतब᳍ है , उस तारीख से, िजसको इस अिधसूचना मᱶ युक्त भारत

के राजपतर् की पर्ितयाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस िदन के भीतर, भूिम के नीचे पाइपलाइन िबछाए

जाने के िलए उसमᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार के संबंध मᱶ सक्षम पर्ािधकारी, इंिडयन ऑयल कापᲃरेशन िलिमटेड पाइपलाइन्स

पर्भाग, िनमार्ण कायार्लय, उᱫरी क्षेतर् पाइपलाइन्स, टूण्डला - गौिरया पाइपलाइन पिरयोजना,ई-160, पर्थम व ि᳇तीय तल,

कमला नगर, आगरा (यू.पी.) – 282004 को िलिखत रूप मᱶ आक्षेप भेज सकेगा।

अनुसूची

तहसील – िसरसागंज

िजला – िफरोजाबाद

राज्य – उᱫर पर्देश

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

खसरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

1

रुधैनी

276

00

27

29

273

00

02

53

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6725

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

खसरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

282

00

06

73

285

00

00

41

272

00

00

46

283

00

09

20

284

00

10

50

289

00

00

56

291

00

00

10

292

00

21

60

328

00

00

45

रुधैनी

330

00

10

93

331

00

09

31

333

00

29

34

334

00

12

84

348

00

03

06

349

00

00

10

507

00

07

63

508

00

03

15

506

00

23

40

505

00

24

92

537

00

05

94

558

00

02

60

493

00

00

42

559

00

15

32

573

00

13

79

560

00

00

93

6726

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

खसरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

561

00

04

59

572

00

08

61

571

00

10

01

562

00

21

18

563

00

04

51

564

00

00

10

992

00

12

16

993

00

06

58

रुधैनी

991

00

01

98

995

00

17

95

996

00

07

78

1007

00

31

15

997

00

06

21

1005

00

05

82

1008

00

02

62

1011

00

09

98

1009

00

05

02

1010

00

03

92

1012

00

28

64

1014

00

04

35

2.

भदेसरा

511

00

00

10

493

00

23

59

494

00

09

86

495

00

19

05

498

00

22

42

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6727

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

खसरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

481

00

03

02

480

00

03

11

474

00

00

10

475

00

10

02

478

00

10

56

477

00

00

10

454

00

24

25

457

00

00

10

455

00

09

10

भदेसरा

456

00

00

43

338

00

02

31

449

00

08

60

450

00

06

81

451

00

00

20

342

00

13

56

349

00

12

29

341

00

03

52

351

00

22

79

352

00

12

25

355

00

31

26

393

00

00

37

357

00

11

25

356

00

00

10

361

00

02

94

359

00

00

89

6728

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

खसरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

360

00

03

69

362

00

10

03

367

00

27

27

273

00

02

05

3.

कवीरपुर

557

00

27

90

558

00

19

12

562

00

00

10

597

00

00

96

563

00

11

74

कवीरपुर

587

00

00

54

586

00

06

74

588

00

00

58

590

00

13

51

536

00

05

44

541

00

02

84

540

00

06

61

539

00

09

24

537

00

04

07

538

00

11

67

539

00

02

50

706

00

02

78

707

00

01

02

708

00

01

00

709

00

00

70

710

00

00

46

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6729

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

खसरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

712

00

00

86

699

00

08

42

700

00

12

85

704

00

12

30

703

00

01

66

719

00

00

33

4.

कीठौत

176

00

19

52

178

00

33

21

479

00

09

48

कीठौत

478

00

01

33

477

00

10

34

467

00

09

41

466

00

10

87

457

00

06

46

436

00

18

65

434

00

00

10

437

00

02

41

426

00

09

95

427

00

05

50

428

00

06

83

429

00

03

61

423

00

09

10

424

00

02

80

422

00

05

48

421

00

02

58

6730

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

खसरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

419

00

02

24

417

00

00

10

418

00

09

08

415

00

01

56

414

00

03

51

413

00

03

06

412

00

22

67

379

00

07

67

380

00

04

06

कीठौत

381

00

02

30

390

00

05

09

383

00

01

63

389

00

02

12

385

00

05

37

388

00

08

10

386

00

00

23

387

00

06

54

369

00

00

21

367

00

00

15

368

00

15

33

365

00

01

40

370

00

01

45

588

00

05

44

589

00

11

33

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6731

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

खसरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

5.

करहरा

486

00

22

33

487

00

06

30

488

00

05

55

508

00

40

36

509

00

07

82

510

00

35

14

676

00

13

90

679

00

28

57

690

00

07

10

करहरा

689

00

00

32

693

00

10

12

695

00

05

49

697

00

02

72

701

00

25

30

700

00

19

95

733

00

29

33

728

00

01

54

727

00

04

79

6.

सूरजपुर सोथरा

50

00

03

14

41

00

26

43

49

00

12

09

48

00

01

95

47

00

05

09

54

00

05

32

55

00

03

67

6732

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

खसरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

53

00

11

50

56

00

00

10

57

00

01

87

58

00

16

66

141

00

50

50

140

00

06

62

142

00

04

33

143

00

05

62

144

00

00

85

7.

सᱭगेमई

78

00

05

38

81

00

11

65

80

00

30

84

82

00

19

87

236

00

10

65

237

00

23

51

8.

सोथरा

627

00

01

31

637

00

06

08

638

00

02

62

642

00

00

10

644

00

08

38

643

00

01

28

645

00

08

94

657

00

14

63

646

00

00

40

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6733

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

खसरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

656

00

12

05

649

00

00

10

651

00

01

93

655

00

07

60

9.

अकबरपुर सराय

291

00

07

31

292

00

05

14

293

00

04

97

294

00

02

27

295

00

01

62

अकबरपुर सराय

296

00

18

62

454

00

00

10

455

00

17

62

427

00

12

12

428

00

02

92

425

00

03

08

423

00

01

98

424

00

11

74

429

00

09

11

430

00

05

94

307

00

00

38

308

00

14

98

309

00

07

76

311

00

07

20

312

00

00

10

408

00

00

33

6734

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

खसरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

310

00

01

12

407

00

20

15

339

00

00

36

338

00

00

10

341

00

00

18

342

00

01

90

340

00

00

79

344

00

01

12

343

00

13

31

अकबरपुर सराय

346

00

00

36

347

00

05

93

350

00

01

32

348

00

03

79

349

00

04

31

357

00

00

36

363

00

04

05

362

00

08

58

370

00

00

36

372

00

07

42

374

00

00

37

376

00

11

40

375

00

03

66

378

00

00

10

390

00

00

41

394

00

12

23

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6735

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

खसरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

396

00

00

36

397

00

09

63

10.

शेरपुर अफजलपुर

360

00

06

13

361

00

05

98

362

00

05

52

359

00

02

00

363

00

02

33

364

00

00

18

357

00

10

00

रपुर अफजलपुर

375

00

09

55

376

00

05

51

377

00

16

99

379

00

00

45

335

00

00

10

380

00

00

52

381

00

01

99

334

00

02

75

333

00

12

90

384/1015

00

00

36

397

00

22

99

396

00

10

37

393

00

06

41

392

00

15

76

391

00

00

56

390

00

14

85

6736

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

खसरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

503

00

12

86

502

00

19

16

502/1029

00

05

51

504

00

02

10

509

00

01

70

510

00

18

24

11.

बहादुरपुर

187

00

02

24

191

00

24

36

189

00

01

10

बहादुरपुर

196

00

00

58

198

00

16

09

199

00

01

31

200

00

00

58

204

00

03

01

205

00

00

10

212

00

00

45

213

00

15

85

215

00

00

10

177

00

02

89

149

00

00

10

148

00

01

04

147

00

00

10

146

00

09

86

216

00

00

10

145

00

03

54

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6737

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

खसरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

144

00

02

45

140

00

11

02

328

00

14

60

135

00

00

10

329

00

05

44

330

00

00

74

331

00

01

40

332

00

01

45

342

00

28

11

बहादुरपुर

374

00

00

40

340

00

06

93

378

00

02

13

382

00

14

26

484

00

21

65

485

00

09

71

488

00

10

63

489

00

00

56

491

00

05

04

520

00

01

66

523

00

15

89

522

00

02

71

522/1421

00

00

69

518

00

08

53

517

00

03

80

516

00

15

84

6738

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

खसरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर्मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

544

00

11

11

545

00

11

23

839

00

00

62

864

00

09

07

863

00

08

72

862

00

00

48

865

00

06

47

870

00

00

55

873

00

07

03

बहादुरपुर

872

00

11

41

879

00

00

57

882

00

03

67

883

00

03

99

884

00

04

06

886

00

06

22

887

00

05

66

888

00

06

01

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)20/2018-ओआर-I/ई-27595]

नोवस िकन् डो, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 11th December, 2018

S.O. 1767.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the

transportation of petroleum products from Tundla Terminal to Kanpur Terminal should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation

Limited. And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is

necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals

Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land ) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its

intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty–one days from the date on which the

copies of this notification, as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the General Public, object in writing

to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under the land to Competent Authority, Indian Oil

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6739

Corporation Limited ( Pipelines Division), Construction Office, Northern Region Pipelines, Tundla-Gawria Pipeline

Project, E-160,1st & 2nd floor, Kamlanagar, Agra(U.P.) – 282 004.

SCHEDULE

Tehsil:- Sirsaganj District:- Firozabad

State :- Uttar Pradesh

Sl.

No.

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

1.

Rudhaini

276

00

27

29

273

00

02

53

282

00

06

73

285

00

00

41

272

00

00

46

283

00

09

20

284

00

10

50

Rudhaini

289

00

00

56

291

00

00

10

292

00

21

60

328

00

00

45

330

00

10

93

331

00

09

31

333

00

29

34

334

00

12

84

348

00

03

06

349

00

00

10

507

00

07

63

508

00

03

15

506

00

23

40

505

00

24

92

537

00

05

94

558

00

02

60

493

00

00

42

559

00

15

32

573

00

13

79

560

00

00

93

561

00

04

59

572

00

08

61

571

00

10

01

562

00

21

18

563

00

04

51

564

00

00

10

992

00

12

16

993

00

06

58

991

00

01

98

6740

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Sl.

No.

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

995

00

17

95

996

00

07

78

1007

00

31

15

997

00

06

21

1005

00

05

82

1008

00

02

62

1011

00

09

98

1009

00

05

02

1010

00

03

92

1012

00

28

64

1014

00

04

35

2.

Bhadesara

511

00

00

10

493

00

23

59

494

00

09

86

495

00

19

05

498

00

22

42

481

00

03

02

480

00

03

11

474

00

00

10

475

00

10

02

478

00

10

56

477

00

00

10

454

00

24

25

457

00

00

10

455

00

09

10

456

00

00

43

338

00

02

31

449

00

08

60

450

00

06

81

451

00

00

20

342

00

13

56

349

00

12

29

341

00

03

52

351

00

22

79

352

00

12

25

355

00

31

26

393

00

00

37

357

00

11

25

356

00

00

10

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6741

Sl.

No.

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

361

00

02

94

359

00

00

89

360

00

03

69

362

00

10

03

367

00

27

27

273

00

02

05

3.

Kabirpur

557

00

27

90

558

00

19

12

562

00

00

10

597

00

00

96

563

00

11

74

Kabirpur

587

00

00

54

586

00

06

74

588

00

00

58

590

00

13

51

536

00

05

44

541

00

02

84

540

00

06

61

539

00

09

24

537

00

04

07

538

00

11

67

539

00

02

50

706

00

02

78

707

00

01

02

708

00

01

00

709

00

00

70

710

00

00

46

712

00

00

86

699

00

08

42

700

00

12

85

704

00

12

30

703

00

01

66

719

00

00

33

4.

Kithaut

176

00

19

52

178

00

33

21

479

00

09

48

478

00

01

33

477

00

10

34

467

00

09

41

466

00

10

87

6742

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Sl.

No.

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

457

00

06

46

436

00

18

65

434

00

00

10

437

00

02

41

426

00

09

95

427

00

05

50

428

00

06

83

429

00

03

61

423

00

09

10

424

00

02

80

422

00

05

48

Kithaut

421

00

02

58

419

00

02

24

417

00

00

10

418

00

09

08

415

00

01

56

414

00

03

51

413

00

03

06

412

00

22

67

379

00

07

67

380

00

04

06

381

00

02

30

390

00

05

09

383

00

01

63

389

00

02

12

385

00

05

37

388

00

08

10

386

00

00

23

387

00

06

54

369

00

00

21

367

00

00

15

368

00

15

33

365

00

01

40

370

00

01

45

588

00

05

44

589

00

11

33

5.

Karahara

486

00

22

33

487

00

06

30

488

00

05

55

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6743

Sl.

No.

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

508

00

40

36

509

00

07

82

510

00

35

14

676

00

13

90

679

00

28

57

690

00

07

10

689

00

00

32

693

00

10

12

695

00

05

49

697

00

02

72

701

00

25

30

Karahara

700

00

19

95

733

00

29

33

728

00

01

54

727

00

04

79

6.

Surajpur Sothra

50

00

03

14

41

00

26

43

49

00

12

09

48

00

01

95

47

00

05

09

54

00

05

32

55

00

03

67

53

00

11

50

56

00

00

10

57

00

01

87

58

00

16

66

141

00

50

50

140

00

06

62

142

00

04

33

143

00

05

62

144

00

00

85

7.

Singemai

78

00

05

38

81

00

11

65

80

00

30

84

82

00

19

87

236

00

10

65

237

00

23

51

8.

Sothara

627

00

01

31

637

00

06

08

6744

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Sl.

No.

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

638

00

02

62

642

00

00

10

644

00

08

38

643

00

01

28

645

00

08

94

657

00

14

63

646

00

00

40

656

00

12

05

649

00

00

10

651

00

01

93

655

00

07

60

9.

Akbarpur Sarai

291

00

07

31

292

00

05

14

293

00

04

97

294

00

02

27

295

00

01

62

296

00

18

62

454

00

00

10

455

00

17

62

427

00

12

12

428

00

02

92

425

00

03

08

423

00

01

98

424

00

11

74

429

00

09

11

430

00

05

94

307

00

00

38

308

00

14

98

309

00

07

76

311

00

07

20

312

00

00

10

408

00

00

33

310

00

01

12

407

00

20

15

339

00

00

36

338

00

00

10

341

00

00

18

342

00

01

90

340

00

00

79

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6745

Sl.

No.

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

344

00

01

12

343

00

13

31

346

00

00

36

347

00

05

93

350

00

01

32

348

00

03

79

349

00

04

31

357

00

00

36

363

00

04

05

362

00

08

58

370

00

00

36

Akbarpur Sarai

372

00

07

42

374

00

00

37

376

00

11

40

375

00

03

66

378

00

00

10

390

00

00

41

394

00

12

23

396

00

00

36

397

00

09

63

10.

Sherpur Afzalpur

360

00

06

13

361

00

05

98

362

00

05

52

359

00

02

00

363

00

02

33

364

00

00

18

357

00

10

00

375

00

09

55

376

00

05

51

377

00

16

99

379

00

00

45

335

00

00

10

380

00

00

52

381

00

01

99

334

00

02

75

333

00

12

90

384/1015

00

00

36

397

00

22

99

396

00

10

37

393

00

06

41

6746

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Sl.

No.

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

392

00

15

76

391

00

00

56

390

00

14

85

503

00

12

86

502

00

19

16

502/1029

00

05

51

504

00

02

10

509

00

01

70

510

00

18

24

11.

Bahadurpur

187

00

02

24

191

00

24

36

Bahadurpur

189

00

01

10

196

00

00

58

198

00

16

09

199

00

01

31

200

00

00

58

204

00

03

01

205

00

00

10

212

00

00

45

213

00

15

85

215

00

00

10

177

00

02

89

149

00

00

10

148

00

01

04

147

00

00

10

146

00

09

86

216

00

00

10

145

00

03

54

144

00

02

45

140

00

11

02

328

00

14

60

135

00

00

10

329

00

05

44

330

00

00

74

331

00

01

40

332

00

01

45

342

00

28

11

374

00

00

40

340

00

06

93

378

00

02

13

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6747

Sl.

No.

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

382

00

14

26

484

00

21

65

485

00

09

71

488

00

10

63

489

00

00

56

491

00

05

04

520

00

01

66

523

00

15

89

522

00

02

71

522/1421

00

00

69

518

00

08

53

Bahadurpur

517

00

03

80

516

00

15

84

544

00

11

11

545

00

11

23

839

00

00

62

864

00

09

07

863

00

08

72

862

00

00

48

865

00

06

47

870

00

00

55

873

00

07

03

872

00

11

41

879

00

00

57

882

00

03

67

883

00

03

99

884

00

04

06

886

00

06

22

887

00

05

66

888

00

06

01

[F. No. R-11025(11)20/2018/OR-I/E-27595]

NOAS KINDO, Under Secy.

नई िदल्ली, 11 िदसम् बर, 2018

का. आ. 1768.—केन्दर्ीय सरकार को लोकिहत मᱶ यह आवश्यक पर्तीत होता है िक उᱫर पर्देश राज्य मᱶ टूण्डला

टिमनल से कानपुर टिमनल तक पेटर्ोिलयम उत्पादᲂ के पिरवहन के िलये इंिडयन ऑयल कापᲃरेशन िलिमटेड ᳇ारा पाइपलाइन

िबछाई जानी चािहए। और केन्दर्ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन िबछाने के पर्योजन के िलये यह आवश्यक पर्तीत होता है िक

ऐसी भूिम मᱶ जो इस से उपाब᳍ अनुसूची मे विणत है, और िजसमᱶ उक्त पाइपलाइन िबछाई जाने का पर्स्ताव है, उपयोग के

अिधकार का अजर्न िकया जाए ।

6748

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

अतः अब, केन्दर्ीय सरकार, पेटर्ोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न) अिधिनयम,

1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1) ᳇ारा पर्दᱫ शिक्तयᲂ का पर्योग करते हुए उस भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार

का अजर्न करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ।

कोई ᳞िक्त, जो उक्त अनुसूची मᱶ विणत भूिम मᱶ िहतब᳍ है , उस तारीख से, िजसको इस अिधसूचना मᱶ युक्त भारत

के राजपतर् की पर्ितयाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हᱹ, इक्कीस िदन के भीतर, भूिम के नीचे पाइपलाइन िबछाए

जाने के िलए उसमᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार के संबंध मᱶ सक्षम पर्ािधकारी, इंिडयन ऑयल कापᲃरेशन िलिमटेड पाइपलाइन्स

पर्भाग, िनमार्ण कायार्लय, उᱫरी क्षेतर् पाइपलाइन्स, टूण्डला - गौिरया पाइपलाइन पिरयोजना, ई-160, पर्थम व ि᳇तीय तल,

कमला नगर, आगरा (यू.पी.) – 282004 को िलिखत रूप मᱶ आक्षेप भेज सकेगा।

अनुसूची

तहसील – जसवंतगर

िजला – इटावा

राज्य – उᱫर पर्देश

बम

सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेऽफल

हेक्टेयर

एयर वगर्मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

1

धनुंआ

1

00

21

33

4

00

02

12

79

00

09

07

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)20/2018-ओआर-I/ई-27595]

नोवस िकन् डो, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 11th December, 2018

S.O. 1768.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the

transportation of petroleum products from Tundla Terminal to Kanpur Terminal should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation

Limited. And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is

necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals

Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land ) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its

intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty–one days from the date on which the

copies of this notification, as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the General Public, object in writing

to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under the land to Competent Authority, Indian Oil

Corporation Limited ( Pipelines Division), Construction Office, Northern Region Pipelines, Tundla-Gawria Pipeline

Project, E-160,1st & 2nd floor, Kamlanagar, Agra(U.P.) – 282 004.

SCHEDULE

Tehsil:- Jaswantnagar

District:- Etawah

State :- Uttar Pradesh

Sl.

No.

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

1

Dhanua

1

00

21

33

4

00

02

12

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6749

79

00

09

07

[F. No. R-11025(11)20/2018/OR-I/E-27595]

NOAS KINDO, Under Secy.

नई िदल्ली, 11 िदसम् बर, 2018

का. आ. 1769.—केन्दर्ीय सरकार को लोकिहत मᱶ यह आवश्यक पर्तीत होता है िक उᱫर पर्देश राज्य मᱶ टूण्डला

टिमनल से कानपुर टिमनल तक पेटर्ोिलयम उत्पादᲂ के पिरवहन के िलये इंिडयन ऑयल कापᲃरेशन िलिमटेड ᳇ारा पाइपलाइन

िबछाई जानी चािहए।

और केन्दर्ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन िबछाने के पर्योजन के िलये यह आवश्यक पर्तीत होता है िक ऐसी भूिम मᱶ

जो इस से उपाब᳍ अनुसूची मे विणत है, और िजसमᱶ उक्त पाइपलाइन िबछाई जाने का पर्स्ताव है, उपयोग के अिधकार का

अजर्न िकया जाए ।

अतः अब, केन्दर्ीय सरकार, पेटर्ोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूिम मे उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न) अिधिनयम,

1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1) ᳇ारा पर्दᱫ शिक्तयो का पर्योग करते हुए उस भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार

का अजर्न करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ।

कोई ᳞िक्त, जो उक्त अनुसूची मᱶ विणत भूिम मᱶ िहतब᳍ है , उस तारीख से, िजसको इस अिधसूचना मᱶ युक्त भारत

के राजपतर् की पर्ितयाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस िदन के भीतर, भूिम के नीचे पाइपलाइन िबछाए

जाने के िलए उसमᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार के संबंध मᱶ सक्षम पर्ािधकारी, इंिडयन ऑयल कापᲃरेशन िलिमटेड पाइपलाइन्स

पर्भाग, िनमार्ण कायार्लय, उᱫरी क्षेतर् पाइपलाइन्स, टूण्डला - गौिरया पाइपलाइन पिरयोजना, ई-160, पर्थम व ि᳇तीय तल,

कमला नगर, आगरा (यू.पी.) – 282004 को िलिखत रूप मᱶ आक्षेप भेज सकेगा।

अनुसूची

तहसील: करहल

िजला: मैनपुरी

राज्य – उᱫर पर्देश

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

1

शाहजहापुर

170

00

18

56

169

00

00

10

162

00

08

75

161

00

11

83

165

00

03

89

164

00

00

82

6750

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

तहसील: करहल

िजला: मैनपुरी

राज्य – उᱫर पर्देश

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

158

00

00

69

157

00

12

35

152

00

00

34

144

00

03

90

133

00

03

70

145

00

00

96

141

00

00

10

शाहजहापुर

131

00

00

37

143

00

00

16

130

00

07

39

391

00

00

66

390

00

33

29

395

00

00

33

426

00

07

16

427

00

16

18

425

00

01

16

424

00

00

19

436

00

07

34

452

00

00

37

468

00

17

31

2

सैय्यदपुर पर्ान

14

00

08

89

22

00

06

43

21

00

01

53

15

00

02

72

16

00

00

78

23

00

15

85

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6751

तहसील: करहल

िजला: मैनपुरी

राज्य – उᱫर पर्देश

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

287

00

00

45

288

00

09

02

289

00

00

54

290

00

00

10

291

00

00

23

292

00

01

96

293

00

07

90

सैय्यदपुर पर्ान

322

00

11

27

323

00

08

83

326

00

00

26

328

00

07

43

329

00

07

89

331

00

07

77

333

00

00

23

334

00

13

73

335

00

06

99

336

00

05

93

338

00

00

28

392

00

02

00

390

00

04

28

393

00

02

15

394

00

02

22

401

00

12

50

402

00

10

38

403

00

09

37

404

00

05

43

6752

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

तहसील: करहल

िजला: मैनपुरी

राज्य – उᱫर पर्देश

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

405

00

00

26

407

00

17

47

411

00

01

14

410

00

01

01

406

00

01

33

364

00

00

10

365

00

05

10

सैय्यदपुर पर्ान

373

00

17

53

374

00

03

30

372

00

00

53

366

00

26

74

266

00

03

02

268

00

03

99

269

00

04

81

270

00

16

32

271

00

01

25

370

00

00

50

3

हाजीपुर सेमरी

178

00

00

15

179

00

00

10

186

00

00

78

180

00

00

10

181

00

00

31

182

00

00

52

183

00

00

61

4

अहमदपुर

173

00

00

69

181

00

01

59

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6753

तहसील: करहल

िजला: मैनपुरी

राज्य – उᱫर पर्देश

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

189

00

09

71

190

00

11

94

225

00

25

52

224

00

00

88

221

00

01

32

264

00

00

37

250

00

00

10

अहमदपुर

248

00

00

15

252

00

22

78

615/247

00

01

00

247

00

00

10

5

ितरकारा दौलतपुर

73

00

06

64

74

00

07

45

75

00

12

35

76

00

03

76

77

00

00

50

84

00

08

06

85

00

06

96

86

00

00

91

87

00

02

38

88

00

00

10

6

शुकरुल्लापुर

215

00

12

58

216

00

15

46

219

00

16

74

229

00

01

77

228

00

02

40

6754

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

तहसील: करहल

िजला: मैनपुरी

राज्य – उᱫर पर्देश

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

227

00

03

59

226

00

03

49

224

00

05

58

234

00

00

56

236

00

13

71

237

00

00

55

253

00

00

10

शुकरुल्लापुर

255

00

00

10

251

00

08

56

252

00

05

84

7

रम्पुरा

410

00

00

18

411

00

08

80

431

00

12

89

449

00

00

32

450

00

00

12

448

00

15

16

451

00

28

07

453

00

00

72

489

00

09

07

488

00

02

52

497

00

22

94

498

00

02

51

502

00

00

30

503

00

08

40

507

00

07

32

508

00

07

86

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6755

तहसील: करहल

िजला: मैनपुरी

राज्य – उᱫर पर्देश

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

523

00

07

42

524

00

06

28

525

00

08

35

582

00

18

92

583

00

00

31

584

00

00

57

585

00

03

83

रम्पुरा

571

00

01

45

572

00

01

94

568

00

25

10

556

00

04

18

555

00

00

73

553

00

04

76

550

00

05

39

549

00

04

96

548

00

06

23

8

मनौना

274

00

05

79

275

00

03

75

276

00

03

15

277

00

03

24

278

00

14

32

263

00

00

26

262

00

11

55

261

00

08

02

309

00

00

10

310

00

20

41

6756

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

तहसील: करहल

िजला: मैनपुरी

राज्य – उᱫर पर्देश

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

313

00

09

68

312

00

05

73

319

00

06

68

320

00

00

48

321

00

04

31

334

00

10

45

325

00

00

21

मनौना

326

00

00

96

332

00

10

97

339

00

00

10

333

00

01

84

337

00

00

57

340

00

15

38

343

00

01

63

345

00

02

98

346

00

06

17

352

00

08

03

507

00

00

27

510

00

29

32

553

00

15

17

554

00

00

10

555

00

04

07

571

00

04

86

556

00

00

61

559

00

12

72

560

00

01

24

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6757

तहसील: करहल

िजला: मैनपुरी

राज्य – उᱫर पर्देश

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

561

00

01

69

921

00

00

41

914

00

02

46

913

00

01

72

915

00

22

53

916

00

01

33

908

00

02

33

मनौना

909

00

00

10

907

00

18

10

823

00

00

10

902

00

04

94

833

00

30

00

831

00

14

48

830

00

07

90

832

00

13

90

834

00

00

54

837

00

19

30

836

00

02

32

839

00

00

54

840

00

00

36

841

00

16

22

842

00

07

30

780

00

02

65

779

00

03

46

778

00

11

14

777

00

00

10

6758

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

तहसील: करहल

िजला: मैनपुरी

राज्य – उᱫर पर्देश

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

776

00

12

22

769

00

00

29

772

00

08

69

773

00

07

89

9

िभडौरा

572

00

01

02

37

00

08

44

41

00

00

37

िभडौरा

44

00

12

81

35

00

01

58

29

00

02

03

30

00

01

01

31

00

11

83

32

00

09

10

33

00

16

72

25

00

00

10

34

00

16

04

91

00

07

05

90

00

04

93

93

00

00

36

116

00

00

28

117

00

26

35

84

00

16

42

83

00

00

10

119

00

00

60

126

00

12

28

130

00

10

58

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6759

तहसील: करहल

िजला: मैनपुरी

राज्य – उᱫर पर्देश

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

140

00

00

36

132

00

00

55

138

00

00

10

147

00

14

16

146

00

13

04

167

00

04

41

168

00

00

10

िभडौरा

162

00

12

64

166

00

10

19

165

00

03

14

185

00

00

44

197

00

06

51

198

00

05

93

199

00

06

03

200

00

05

98

201

00

05

90

218

00

04

20

217

00

26

41

215

00

15

05

10

अमामई

386

00

01

15

387

00

00

10

385

00

12

14

390

00

01

17

389

00

09

10

384

00

01

07

382

00

10

69

6760

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

तहसील: करहल

िजला: मैनपुरी

राज्य – उᱫर पर्देश

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

439

00

06

19

440

00

05

56

438

00

01

40

426

00

02

13

427

00

06

30

450

00

00

10

433

00

04

66

अमामई

434

00

04

11

435

00

01

01

436

00

05

72

455

00

00

40

478

00

22

88

479

00

00

12

477

00

04

47

487

00

00

29

490

00

06

07

476

00

00

88

475

00

17

37

474

00

00

40

499

00

04

44

500

00

08

11

501

00

09

64

502

00

05

10

512

00

01

17

759

00

12

72

511

00

00

10

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6761

तहसील: करहल

िजला: मैनपुरी

राज्य – उᱫर पर्देश

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

791

00

00

64

790

00

09

90

11

बूरामई

176

00

03

65

175

00

01

87

177

00

10

27

239

00

00

58

240

00

00

58

बूरामई

241

00

08

08

242

00

00

39

419

00

00

10

243

00

32

41

417

00

05

70

416

00

10

73

411

00

00

39

410

00

03

63

409

00

04

38

408

00

04

04

407

00

03

53

405

00

00

37

401

00

10

09

399

00

00

12

398

00

09

50

397

00

06

69

396

00

04

39

6762

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

तहसील: करहल

िजला: मैनपुरी

राज्य – उᱫर पर्देश

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

395

00

05

60

392

00

05

15

391

00

12

88

390

00

05

66

388

00

00

38

387

00

09

14

बूरामई

386

00

03

82

385

00

00

32

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)20/2018-ओआर-I/ई-27595]

नोवस िकन् डो, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 11th December, 2018

S.O. 1769.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the

transportation of petroleum products from Tundla Terminal to Kanpur Terminal should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation

Limited. And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is

necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals

Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its

intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty–one days from the date on which the

copies of this notification, as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the General Public, object in writing

to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under the land to Competent Authority, Indian Oil

Corporation Limited (Pipelines Division), Construction Office, Northern Region Pipelines, Tundla-Gawria Pipeline

Project, E-160,1st & 2nd floor, Kamlanagar, Agra (U.P.) – 282 004.

SCHEDULE

Tehsil:- Karhal

District:- Mainpuri

State :- Uttar Pradesh

Sl.

No.

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

1

Shahjahanpur

170

00

18

56

169

00

00

10

162

00

08

75

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6763

Sl.

No.

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

161

00

11

83

165

00

03

89

164

00

00

82

158

00

00

69

157

00

12

35

152

00

00

34

144

00

03

90

133

00

03

70

Shahjahanpur

145

00

00

96

141

00

00

10

131

00

00

37

143

00

00

16

130

00

07

39

391

00

00

66

390

00

33

29

395

00

00

33

426

00

07

16

427

00

16

18

425

00

01

16

424

00

00

19

436

00

07

34

452

00

00

37

468

00

17

31

2

Saiyadpur Pran

14

00

08

89

22

00

06

43

21

00

01

53

15

00

02

72

16

00

00

78

23

00

15

85

287

00

00

45

6764

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Sl.

No.

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

288

00

09

02

289

00

00

54

290

00

00

10

291

00

00

23

292

00

01

96

293

00

07

90

322

00

11

27

323

00

08

83

Saiyadpur Pran

326

00

00

26

328

00

07

43

329

00

07

89

331

00

07

77

333

00

00

23

334

00

13

73

335

00

06

99

336

00

05

93

338

00

00

28

392

00

02

00

390

00

04

28

393

00

02

15

394

00

02

22

401

00

12

50

402

00

10

38

403

00

09

37

404

00

05

43

405

00

00

26

407

00

17

47

411

00

01

14

410

00

01

01

406

00

01

33

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6765

Sl.

No.

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

364

00

00

10

365

00

05

10

373

00

17

53

374

00

03

30

372

00

00

53

366

00

26

74

266

00

03

02

268

00

03

99

Saiyadpur Pran

269

00

04

81

270

00

16

32

271

00

01

25

370

00

00

50

3

Hajipur Samari

178

00

00

15

179

00

00

10

186

00

00

78

180

00

00

10

181

00

00

31

182

00

00

52

183

00

00

61

4

Ahmadpur

173

00

00

69

181

00

01

59

189

00

09

71

190

00

11

94

225

00

25

52

224

00

00

88

221

00

01

32

264

00

00

37

250

00

00

10

248

00

00

15

252

00

22

78

6766

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Sl.

No.

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

615/247

00

01

00

247

00

00

10

5

Tirkara Daulatpur

73

00

06

64

74

00

07

45

75

00

12

35

76

00

03

76

77

00

00

50

84

00

08

06

Tirkara Daulatpur

85

00

06

96

86

00

00

91

87

00

02

38

88

00

00

10

6

Shukrullapur

215

00

12

58

216

00

15

46

219

00

16

74

229

00

01

77

228

00

02

40

227

00

03

59

226

00

03

49

224

00

05

58

234

00

00

56

236

00

13

71

237

00

00

55

253

00

00

10

255

00

00

10

251

00

08

56

252

00

05

84

7

Rampura

410

00

00

18

411

00

08

80

431

00

12

89

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6767

Sl.

No.

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

449

00

00

32

450

00

00

12

448

00

15

16

451

00

28

07

453

00

00

72

489

00

09

07

488

00

02

52

497

00

22

94

Rampura

498

00

02

51

502

00

00

30

503

00

08

40

507

00

07

32

508

00

07

86

523

00

07

42

524

00

06

28

525

00

08

35

582

00

18

92

583

00

00

31

584

00

00

57

585

00

03

83

571

00

01

45

572

00

01

94

568

00

25

10

556

00

04

18

555

00

00

73

553

00

04

76

550

00

05

39

549

00

04

96

548

00

06

23

8

Manauna

274

00

05

79

6768

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Sl.

No.

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

275

00

03

75

276

00

03

15

277

00

03

24

278

00

14

32

263

00

00

26

262

00

11

55

261

00

08

02

309

00

00

10

Manauna

310

00

20

41

313

00

09

68

312

00

05

73

319

00

06

68

320

00

00

48

321

00

04

31

334

00

10

45

325

00

00

21

326

00

00

96

332

00

10

97

339

00

00

10

333

00

01

84

337

00

00

57

340

00

15

38

343

00

01

63

345

00

02

98

346

00

06

17

352

00

08

03

507

00

00

27

510

00

29

32

553

00

15

17

554

00

00

10

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6769

Sl.

No.

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

555

00

04

07

571

00

04

86

556

00

00

61

559

00

12

72

560

00

01

24

561

00

01

69

921

00

00

41

914

00

02

46

Manauna

913

00

01

72

915

00

22

53

916

00

01

33

908

00

02

33

909

00

00

10

907

00

18

10

823

00

00

10

902

00

04

94

833

00

30

00

831

00

14

48

830

00

07

90

832

00

13

90

834

00

00

54

837

00

19

30

836

00

02

32

839

00

00

54

840

00

00

36

841

00

16

22

842

00

07

30

780

00

02

65

779

00

03

46

778

00

11

14

6770

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Sl.

No.

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

777

00

00

10

776

00

12

22

769

00

00

29

772

00

08

69

773

00

07

89

9

Bhidaura

572

00

01

02

37

00

08

44

41

00

00

37

Bhidaura

44

00

12

81

35

00

01

58

29

00

02

03

30

00

01

01

31

00

11

83

32

00

09

10

33

00

16

72

25

00

00

10

34

00

16

04

91

00

07

05

90

00

04

93

93

00

00

36

116

00

00

28

117

00

26

35

84

00

16

42

83

00

00

10

119

00

00

60

126

00

12

28

130

00

10

58

140

00

00

36

132

00

00

55

138

00

00

10

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6771

Sl.

No.

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

147

00

14

16

146

00

13

04

167

00

04

41

168

00

00

10

162

00

12

64

166

00

10

19

165

00

03

14

185

00

00

44

Bhidaura

197

00

06

51

198

00

05

93

199

00

06

03

200

00

05

98

201

00

05

90

218

00

04

20

217

00

26

41

215

00

15

05

10

Amamai

386

00

01

15

387

00

00

10

385

00

12

14

390

00

01

17

389

00

09

10

384

00

01

07

382

00

10

69

439

00

06

19

440

00

05

56

438

00

01

40

426

00

02

13

427

00

06

30

450

00

00

10

433

00

04

66

6772

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Sl.

No.

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

434

00

04

11

435

00

01

01

436

00

05

72

455

00

00

40

478

00

22

88

479

00

00

12

477

00

04

47

487

00

00

29

Amamai

490

00

06

07

476

00

00

88

475

00

17

37

474

00

00

40

499

00

04

44

500

00

08

11

501

00

09

64

502

00

05

10

512

00

01

17

759

00

12

72

511

00

00

10

791

00

00

64

790

00

09

90

11

Buramai

176

00

03

65

175

00

01

87

177

00

10

27

239

00

00

58

240

00

00

58

241

00

08

08

242

00

00

39

419

00

00

10

243

00

32

41

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6773

Sl.

No.

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

417

00

05

70

416

00

10

73

411

00

00

39

410

00

03

63

409

00

04

38

408

00

04

04

407

00

03

53

405

00

00

37

Buramai

401

00

10

09

399

00

00

12

398

00

09

50

397

00

06

69

396

00

04

39

395

00

05

60

392

00

05

15

391

00

12

88

390

00

05

66

388

00

00

38

387

00

09

14

386

00

03

82

385

00

00

32

[F. No. R-11025(11)20/2018-OR-I/E-27595]

NOAS KINDO, Under Secy.

नई िदल्ली, 11 िदसम् बर, 2018

का. आ. 1770.—केन्दर्ीय सरकार को लोकिहत मᱶ यह आवश्यक पर्तीत होता है िक उᱫर पर्देश राज्य मᱶ टूण्डला

टिमनल से कानपुर टिमनल तक पेटर्ोिलयम उत्पादᲂ के पिरवहन के िलये इंिडयन ऑयल कापᲃरेशन िलिमटेड ᳇ारा पाइपलाइन

िबछाई जानी चािहए।

और केन्दर्ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन िबछाने के पर्योजन के िलये यह आवश्यक पर्तीत होता है िक ऐसी भूिम मᱶ

जो इससे उपाब᳍ अनुसूची मᱶ विणत है, और िजसमᱶ उक्त पाइपलाइन िबछाई जाने का पर्स्ताव है, उपयोग के अिधकार का

अजर्न िकया जाए ।

6774

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

अतः अब, केन्दर्ीय सरकार, पेटर्ोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न) अिधिनयम,

1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1) ᳇ारा पर्दᱫ शिक्तयᲂ का पर्योग करते हुए उस भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार

का अजर्न करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ।

कोई ᳞िक्त, जो उक्त अनुसूची मᱶ विणत भूिम मᱶ िहतब᳍ है , उस तारीख से, िजसको इस अिधसूचना मᱶ युक्त भारत

के राजपतर् की पर्ितयाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस िदन के भीतर, भूिम के नीचे पाइपलाइन िबछाए

जाने के िलए उसमᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार के संबंध मᱶ सक्षम पर्ािधकारी, इंिडयन ऑयल कापᲃरेशन िलिमटेड पाइपलाइन्स

पर्भाग, िनमार्ण कायार्लय, उᱫरी क्षेतर् पाइपलाइन्स, टूण्डला - गौिरया पाइपलाइन पिरयोजना,ई-160, पर्थम व ि᳇तीय तल,

कमला नगर, आगरा (यू.पी.) – 282004 को िलिखत रूप मᱶ आक्षेप भेज सकेगा।

अनुसूची

तहसील – इटावा िजला – इटावा

राज्य – उᱫर पर्देश

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

1

रािहन

1033

00

00

31

1056

00

19

18

1063

00

01

33

1064

00

14

53

1062

00

10

58

1060

00

01

28

1061

00

00

62

706

00

03

57

708

00

01

24

707

00

13

48

709

00

11

09

710

00

00

50

705

00

00

44

703

00

01

14

711

00

22

88

712

00

14

40

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6775

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

682

00

00

79

690

00

00

15

689

00

15

18

691

00

00

36

2

गुलावपुर

322

00

06

36

324

00

11

29

328

00

00

38

329

00

06

83

331

00

07

20

गुलावपुर

334

00

15

84

335

00

00

29

304

00

14

00

305

00

10

64

306

00

00

10

350

00

36

69

351

00

14

98

353

00

14

44

354

00

01

67

356

00

01

13

355

00

00

82

292

00

05

31

288

00

07

65

287

00

02

84

289

00

00

27

274

00

00

27

275

00

03

07

3

केशᲂपुर रािहन

140

00

02

98

6776

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

139

00

00

66

138

00

03

74

137

00

10

36

123

00

01

30

122

00

06

27

121

00

00

10

118

00

01

40

115

00

06

35

114

00

00

54

केशᲂपुर रािहन

111

00

00

48

106

00

00

47

105

00

09

85

104

00

14

49

103

00

01

64

255

00

00

69

284

00

15

65

283

00

12

56

285

00

00

10

281

00

00

92

277

00

01

50

288

00

00

59

291

00

00

10

292

00

05

03

296

00

03

79

294

00

00

60

295

00

03

20

297

00

00

10

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6777

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

303

00

08

75

304

00

00

39

307

00

09

07

306

00

18

39

305

00

00

94

318

00

00

23

325

00

17

71

326

00

04

92

327

00

11

48

केशᲂपुर रािहन

330

00

15

78

4

सुल्तानपुर रािहन

485

00

02

28

5

गंगापुर

64

00

00

90

67

00

05

02

72

00

03

57

73

00

13

55

74

00

01

63

76

00

00

27

161

00

12

70

157

00

04

99

158

00

01

42

159

00

00

10

154

00

00

61

148

00

00

26

147

00

01

95

146

00

02

65

145

00

00

32

144

00

00

43

6778

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

143

00

01

33

142

00

00

42

166

00

02

59

140

00

13

72

125

00

18

74

120

00

01

48

119

00

00

88

121

00

02

67

116

00

12

81

गंगापुर

114

00

00

71

176

00

00

21

183

00

00

24

178

00

04

71

180

00

01

39

181

00

01

07

181/844

00

00

52

182

00

00

10

179

00

04

86

6

िवठौली

93

00

05

19

89

00

05

63

79

00

22

44

90

00

00

10

122

00

06

57

123

00

05

21

136

00

15

55

135

00

04

42

134

00

05

05

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6779

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

137

00

00

16

131

00

00

40

199

00

00

10

198

00

23

04

197

00

04

17

196

00

09

14

195

00

01

41

312

00

08

32

313

00

10

83

िवठौली

314

00

04

67

315

00

02

59

316

00

04

31

264

00

00

10

265

00

00

10

321

00

00

38

324

00

03

80

325

00

00

10

311

00

00

19

264

00

00

10

265

00

00

10

274

00

04

89

275

00

07

70

276

00

06

91

277

00

08

87

298

00

19

50

297

00

01

20

301

00

06

51

6780

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

300

00

07

40

306

00

04

16

302

00

01

67

305

00

00

10

304

00

00

28

7

चौिबया

1289

00

09

31

1290

00

09

69

1285

00

00

88

1291

00

15

08

चौिबया

1304

00

04

39

1306

00

15

05

1277

00

04

85

1276

00

03

62

1275

00

09

16

1273

00

24

71

1424

00

00

36

1432

00

00

86

1431

00

10

27

1434

00

00

36

1435

00

14

24

1436

00

00

46

8

बख्त्यारपुर

247

00

00

46

246

00

00

70

248

00

07

76

252

00

17

68

253

00

08

82

261

00

11

73

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6781

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

263

00

00

46

264

00

09

03

270

00

09

72

271

00

21

23

276

00

13

55

278

00

00

10

9

खेडा हेलू

4

00

00

28

2

00

05

90

3

00

05

57

खेडा हेलू

5

00

07

71

10

मूंज

3437

00

10

47

3438

00

31

31

3432

00

41

43

3431

00

39

02

3427

00

00

52

3424

00

24

13

3423

00

29

45

3454

00

00

10

3452

00

06

56

3455

00

03

47

3354

00

09

50

3355

00

06

76

3357

00

07

24

3360

00

21

02

3358

00

03

46

3339

00

10

64

3361

00

36

89

6782

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

3336

00

05

67

3307

00

09

14

3571

00

09

49

3572

00

59

41

3547

00

18

48

3543

00

02

01

3542

00

01

23

3541

00

05

09

3548

00

19

80

मूंज

3535

00

00

49

3549

00

00

49

3551

00

01

06

3532

00

33

61

3550

00

02

89

3531

00

31

09

3744

00

10

74

3733

00

02

20

3734

00

03

42

3735

00

07

76

3736

00

06

62

3747

00

23

89

3748

00

00

27

3751

00

00

10

3753

00

12

80

3765

00

10

02

3764

00

06

40

3761

00

07

23

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6783

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

3760

00

02

79

11

मसनाई

454

00

20

84

453

00

39

44

451

00

04

38

440

00

43

51

446

00

08

13

447

00

07

35

450

00

00

10

449

00

00

55

मसनाई

448

00

05

14

484

00

44

29

490

00

01

80

498

00

00

10

499

00

01

22

479

00

02

13

478

00

00

73

477

00

17

09

508

00

03

25

500

00

21

47

497

00

00

17

495

00

00

89

504

00

01

25

501

00

00

10

505

00

41

02

12

सदनपुर

108

00

07

02

107

00

05

40

106

00

14

03

6784

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

104

00

00

10

103

00

00

52

97

00

02

53

100

00

07

26

101

00

07

53

150

00

07

24

149

00

02

07

151

00

00

78

152

00

14

32

सदनपुर

153

00

06

32

154

00

06

61

155

00

11

80

180

00

09

06

181

00

01

64

182

00

05

33

207

00

03

22

208

00

00

33

183

00

01

95

206

00

02

69

205

00

03

58

204

00

00

49

199

00

05

48

198

00

07

11

197

00

00

38

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)20/2018-ओआर-I/ई-27595]

नोवस िकन् डो, अवर सिचव

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6785

New Delhi, the 11th December, 2018

S.O. 1770.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the

transportation of petroleum products from Tundla Terminal to Kanpur Terminal should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation

Limited. And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is

necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals

Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land ) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its

intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty–one days from the date on which the

copies of this notification, as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the General Public, object in writing

to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under the land to Competent Authority, Indian Oil

Corporation Limited ( Pipelines Division), Construction Office, Northern Region Pipelines, Tundla-Gawria Pipeline

Project, E-160,1st & 2nd floor, Kamlanagar, Agra(U.P.) – 282 004.

SCHEDULE

Tehsil:- Etawah

District:- Etawah

State :- Uttar Pradesh

Sl.

No.

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

1

Rahin

1033

00

00

31

1056

00

19

18

1063

00

01

33

1064

00

14

53

1062

00

10

58

1060

00

01

28

1061

00

00

62

706

00

03

57

708

00

01

24

707

00

13

48

709

00

11

09

710

00

00

50

705

00

00

44

703

00

01

14

711

00

22

88

712

00

14

40

682

00

00

79

690

00

00

15

689

00

15

18

691

00

00

36

2

Gulabpur

322

00

06

36

324

00

11

29

328

00

00

38

329

00

06

83

331

00

07

20

334

00

15

84

335

00

00

29

304

00

14

00

305

00

10

64

306

00

00

10

350

00

36

69

351

00

14

98

6786

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Sl.

No.

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

353

00

14

44

354

00

01

67

356

00

01

13

355

00

00

82

292

00

05

31

288

00

07

65

287

00

02

84

289

00

00

27

274

00

00

27

275

00

03

07

3

Keshonpur Rahin

140

00

02

98

139

00

00

66

138

00

03

74

137

00

10

36

123

00

01

30

Keshonpur Rahin

122

00

06

27

121

00

00

10

118

00

01

40

115

00

06

35

114

00

00

54

111

00

00

48

106

00

00

47

105

00

09

85

104

00

14

49

103

00

01

64

255

00

00

69

284

00

15

65

283

00

12

56

285

00

00

10

281

00

00

92

277

00

01

50

288

00

00

59

291

00

00

10

292

00

05

03

296

00

03

79

294

00

00

60

295

00

03

20

297

00

00

10

303

00

08

75

304

00

00

39

307

00

09

07

306

00

18

39

305

00

00

94

318

00

00

23

325

00

17

71

326

00

04

92

327

00

11

48

330

00

15

78

4

Sultanpur Rahin

485

00

02

28

5

Gangapur

64

00

00

90

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6787

Sl.

No.

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

67

00

05

02

72

00

03

57

73

00

13

55

74

00

01

63

76

00

00

27

161

00

12

70

157

00

04

99

158

00

01

42

159

00

00

10

154

00

00

61

148

00

00

26

147

00

01

95

146

00

02

65

145

00

00

32

144

00

00

43

Gangapur

143

00

01

33

142

00

00

42

166

00

02

59

140

00

13

72

125

00

18

74

120

00

01

48

119

00

00

88

121

00

02

67

116

00

12

81

114

00

00

71

176

00

00

21

183

00

00

24

178

00

04

71

180

00

01

39

181

00

01

07

181/844

00

00

52

182

00

00

10

179

00

04

86

6

Bitholi

93

00

05

19

89

00

05

63

79

00

22

44

90

00

00

10

122

00

06

57

123

00

05

21

136

00

15

55

135

00

04

42

134

00

05

05

137

00

00

16

131

00

00

40

199

00

00

10

198

00

23

04

197

00

04

17

196

00

09

14

195

00

01

41

312

00

08

32

6788

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Sl.

No.

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

313

00

10

83

314

00

04

67

315

00

02

59

316

00

04

31

264

00

00

10

265

00

00

10

321

00

00

38

324

00

03

80

325

00

00

10

311

00

00

19

264

00

00

10

265

00

00

10

274

00

04

89

275

00

07

70

276

00

06

91

Bitholi

277

00

08

87

298

00

19

50

297

00

01

20

301

00

06

51

300

00

07

40

306

00

04

16

302

00

01

67

305

00

00

10

304

00

00

28

7

Chobiya

1289

00

09

31

1290

00

09

69

1285

00

00

88

1291

00

15

08

1304

00

04

39

1306

00

15

05

1277

00

04

85

1276

00

03

62

1275

00

09

16

1273

00

24

71

1424

00

00

36

1432

00

00

86

1431

00

10

27

1434

00

00

36

1435

00

14

24

1436

00

00

46

8

Bakhityarpur

247

00

00

46

246

00

00

70

248

00

07

76

252

00

17

68

253

00

08

82

261

00

11

73

263

00

00

46

264

00

09

03

270

00

09

72

271

00

21

23

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6789

Sl.

No.

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

276

00

13

55

278

00

00

10

9

Kherahelu

4

00

00

28

2

00

05

90

3

00

05

57

5

00

07

71

10

Moonj

3437

00

10

47

3438

00

31

31

3432

00

41

43

3431

00

39

02

3427

00

00

52

3424

00

24

13

3423

00

29

45

3454

00

00

10

3452

00

06

56

Moonj

3455

00

03

47

3354

00

09

50

3355

00

06

76

3357

00

07

24

3360

00

21

02

3358

00

03

46

3339

00

10

64

3361

00

36

89

3336

00

05

67

3307

00

09

14

3571

00

09

49

3572

00

59

41

3547

00

18

48

3543

00

02

01

3542

00

01

23

3541

00

05

09

3548

00

19

80

3535

00

00

49

3549

00

00

49

3551

00

01

06

3532

00

33

61

3550

00

02

89

3531

00

31

09

3744

00

10

74

3733

00

02

20

3734

00

03

42

3735

00

07

76

3736

00

06

62

3747

00

23

89

3748

00

00

27

3751

00

00

10

3753

00

12

80

3765

00

10

02

3764

00

06

40

3761

00

07

23

6790

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Sl.

No.

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

3760

00

02

79

11

Masnai

454

00

20

84

453

00

39

44

451

00

04

38

440

00

43

51

446

00

08

13

447

00

07

35

450

00

00

10

449

00

00

55

448

00

05

14

484

00

44

29

490

00

01

80

498

00

00

10

499

00

01

22

Masnai

479

00

02

13

478

00

00

73

477

00

17

09

508

00

03

25

500

00

21

47

497

00

00

17

495

00

00

89

504

00

01

25

501

00

00

10

505

00

41

02

12

Sadanpur

108

00

07

02

107

00

05

40

106

00

14

03

104

00

00

10

103

00

00

52

97

00

02

53

100

00

07

26

101

00

07

53

150

00

07

24

149

00

02

07

151

00

00

78

152

00

14

32

153

00

06

32

154

00

06

61

155

00

11

80

180

00

09

06

181

00

01

64

182

00

05

33

207

00

03

22

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6791

Sl.

No.

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

208

00

00

33

183

00

01

95

206

00

02

69

205

00

03

58

204

00

00

49

199

00

05

48

198

00

07

11

197

00

00

38

[F. No. R-11025(11)20/2018-OR-I/E-27595]

NOAS KINDO, Under Secy.

नई िदल्ली, 11 िदसम् बर, 2018

का. आ. 1771.—केन्दर्ीय सरकार को लोकिहत मᱶ यह आवश्यक पर्तीत होता है िक उᱫर पर्देश राज्य मᱶ टूण्डला

टिमनल से कानपुर टिमनल तक पेटर्ोिलयम उत्पादᲂ के पिरवहन के िलये इंिडयन ऑयल कापᲃरेशन िलिमटेड ᳇ारा पाइपलाइन

िबछाई जानी चािहए।

और केन्दर्ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन िबछाने के पर्योजन के िलये यह आवश्यक पर्तीत होता है िक ऐसी भूिम मᱶ

जो इस से उपाब᳍ अनुसूची मे विणत है, और िजसमᱶ उक्त पाइपलाइन िबछाई जाने का पर्स्ताव है, उपयोग के अिधकार का

अजर्न िकया जाए ।

अतः अब, केन्दर्ीय सरकार, पेटर्ोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार का अजर्न) अिधिनयम,

1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1) ᳇ारा पर्दᱫ शिक्तयो का पर्योग करते हुए उस भूिम मᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार

का अजर्न करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ।

कोई ᳞िक्त, जो उक्त अनुसूची मᱶ विणत भूिम मᱶ िहतब᳍ है , उस तारीख से, िजसको इस अिधसूचना मᱶ युक्त भारत

के राजपतर् की पर्ितयाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस िदन के भीतर, भूिम के नीचे पाइपलाइन िबछाए

जाने के िलए उसमᱶ उपयोग के अिधकार के संबंध मᱶ सक्षम पर्ािधकारी, इंिडयन ऑयल कापᲃरेशन िलिमटेड पाइपलाइन्स

पर्भाग, िनमार्ण कायार्लय, उᱫरी क्षेतर् पाइपलाइन्स, टूण्डला - गौिरया पाइपलाइन पिरयोजना, ई-160, पर्थम व ि᳇तीय तल,

कमला नगर, आगरा (यू.पी.) – 282004 को िलिखत रूप मᱶ आक्षेप भेज सकेगा।

अनुसूची

तहसील – सैफई िजला – इटावा

राज्य – उᱫर पर्देश

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

1.

िवयारी भटपुरा

2

00

00

10

3

00

14

27

6792

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

00

05

61

8

00

03

60

9

00

20

83

12

00

05

80

28

00

12

06

29

00

17

02

30

00

07

02

31

00

00

10

46

00

15

33

47

00

05

85

45

00

07

26

िवयारी भटपुरा

92

00

09

09

103

00

12

41

102

00

10

95

101

00

10

90

100

00

00

36

99

00

10

22

207

00

25

94

187

00

02

15

190

00

16

48

201

00

10

99

194

00

00

62

193

00

11

47

195

00

18

04

183

00

17

71

172

00

62

33

163

00

00

10

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6793

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

164

00

01

19

165

00

02

84

171

00

02

05

169

00

03

81

173

00

02

00

2.

िझगूपुर

35

00

22

73

34

00

18

55

33

00

17

06

181

00

09

57

180

00

20

46

203

00

52

98

िझगूपुर

202

00

00

14

204

00

18

63

206

00

00

10

3.

चौबेपुर

10

00

08

39

9

00

09

02

8

00

02

12

39

00

00

17

40

00

19

75

41

00

00

37

4.

गᱭजा

519

00

00

42

520

00

03

92

521

00

11

59

522

00

07

19

526

00

16

57

527

00

09

16

531

00

10

86

6794

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

532

00

03

44

586

00

17

77

533

00

00

21

585

00

01

78

583

00

00

10

584

00

16

66

588

00

00

34

590

00

23

54

603

00

13

17

602

00

01

51

600

00

11

64

गᱭजा

599

00

20

21

611

00

00

10

612

00

00

29

613

00

00

36

666

00

00

10

669

00

10

57

668

00

04

80

667

00

12

44

674

00

00

67

687

00

22

54

706

00

18

97

705

00

08

32

1006

00

00

42

1001

00

18

32

999

00

31

01

1019

00

00

10

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6795

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

993

00

05

77

992

00

11

63

991

00

20

12

989

00

08

87

988

00

06

39

987

00

17

10

986

00

00

30

985

00

07

18

5.

ितरकाराबाचा

11

00

07

68

न.सुभान

10

00

17

86

104

00

00

10

ितरकाराबाचा

103

00

00

10

न.सुभान

102

00

00

10

9

00

10

30

106

00

09

97

108

00

07

19

99

00

11

99

110

00

00

50

98

00

31

57

95

00

12

39

155

00

30

14

154

00

00

10

156

00

17

51

157

00

08

11

6.

लछवाई

297

00

20

26

296

00

00

10

310

00

31

64

6796

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

311

00

00

55

313

00

15

47

329

00

54

09

319

00

00

52

322

00

30

58

476

00

25

12

477

00

01

80

478

00

08

72

479

00

00

41

480

00

05

97

481

00

09

47

लछवाई

482

00

00

10

488

00

34

93

487

00

00

68

490

00

13

41

489

00

05

33

492

00

02

15

493

00

04

66

500

00

04

06

498

00

04

31

499

00

01

89

497

00

09

53

496

00

00

17

600

00

00

10

502

00

00

55

599

00

00

74

598

00

05

76

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6797

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

596

00

07

19

597

00

01

46

602

00

00

50

603

00

17

68

594

00

15

23

593

00

00

23

606

00

01

55

592

00

08

09

608

00

02

11

978

00

12

39

979

00

29

40

लछवाई

996

00

06

50

997

00

08

76

1005

00

08

60

995

00

00

10

1006

00

08

15

1008

00

00

10

1009

00

00

10

994

00

12

72

1007

00

02

05

1010

00

10

55

1020

00

01

27

1021

00

13

68

1023

00

02

41

1022

00

05

27

903

00

12

79

902

00

08

88

6798

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

901

00

01

31

900

00

12

79

873

00

06

99

899

00

03

58

898

00

09

57

887

00

02

17

896

00

00

72

895

00

00

20

888

00

15

12

894

00

00

10

893

00

00

10

लछवाई

892

00

02

42

891

00

02

49

854

00

03

27

851

00

01

14

844

00

00

20

852

00

01

00

853

00

04

65

856

00

01

74

839

00

00

76

837

00

03

57

838

00

00

26

836

00

04

13

834

00

18

55

835

00

00

10

833

00

26

23

826

00

01

00

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6799

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

832

00

00

10

812

00

31

08

813

00

08

45

814

00

00

10

7.

नरहौली िभडरुआ

22

00

22

87

25

00

01

27

24

00

00

60

23

00

04

70

28

00

00

10

30

00

00

77

29

00

32

83

नरहौली िभडरुआ

321

00

01

25

334

00

08

26

335

00

17

16

340

00

11

50

341

00

06

19

508

00

01

86

495

00

29

62

496

00

14

15

497

00

02

59

8.

िपडारी

198

00

01

09

1156

00

07

33

1157

00

03

06

1158

00

18

02

1159

00

14

96

1150

00

05

58

1147

00

00

58

6800

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

1146

00

06

21

9.

ककरारा

68

00

10

47

66

00

03

34

67

00

01

41

65

00

12

98

61

00

01

18

64

00

06

14

63

00

10

82

88

00

00

85

96

00

22

78

95

00

09

07

ककरारा

131

00

08

24

129

00

17

59

127

00

16

64

125

00

15

94

10.

उसरई

285

00

03

87

283

00

22

26

282

00

00

21

276

00

00

41

275

00

02

32

274

00

07

48

273

00

00

45

272

00

12

28

139

00

03

29

145

00

11

28

143

00

00

90

144

00

01

18

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6801

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

146

00

12

77

147

00

37

80

148

00

64

24

100

00

00

50

85

00

00

10

173

00

40

19

177

00

06

99

178

00

11

90

169

00

01

17

219

00

05

91

215

00

00

66

उसरई

214

00

00

33

218

00

00

11

213

00

04

61

212

00

04

31

211

00

00

59

209

00

10

19

208

00

10

47

228

00

00

65

238

00

10

67

237

00

02

11

233

00

00

10

235

00

00

10

240

00

05

96

246

00

21

04

11.

कुम्हावर

165

00

00

38

169

00

00

10

6802

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

168

00

15

53

166

00

00

91

167

00

06

93

172

00

05

25

173

00

05

85

175

00

05

27

176

00

05

77

180

00

09

95

179

00

00

22

181

00

04

28

182

00

00

10

कुम्हावर

185

00

06

70

194

00

02

39

192

00

01

69

195

00

01

95

196

00

00

60

529

00

00

67

518

00

00

10

530

00

00

10

531

00

08

72

533

00

03

12

534

00

00

10

560

00

43

06

572

00

00

36

573

00

06

87

574

00

06

50

571

00

00

10

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6803

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

644

00

03

46

642

00

00

10

643

00

03

89

631

00

00

10

630

00

00

10

625

00

00

22

626

00

13

30

627

00

02

01

628

00

00

10

622

00

10

92

612

00

13

86

कुम्हावर

610

00

10

72

609

00

05

33

12.

लᲅगपुर

29

00

01

24

30

00

01

38

33

00

02

37

32

00

17

63

72

00

01

57

73

00

11

30

74

00

04

56

75

00

08

39

76

00

03

94

77

00

03

70

78

00

03

65

81

00

00

10

83

00

05

31

82

00

00

72

6804

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

133

00

01

50

136

00

01

20

137

00

04

18

138

00

06

76

142

00

04

13

143

00

00

67

145

00

05

77

147

00

03

04

148

00

02

66

229

00

04

11

227

00

01

62

लᲅगपुर

231

00

01

36

232

00

01

54

233

00

01

38

235

00

03

53

237

00

15

91

238

00

00

36

230

00

00

10

239

00

10

22

240

00

10

22

241

00

02

07

13.

तुलसीपुर

202

00

00

10

201

00

02

74

200

00

13

73

199

00

00

70

198

00

00

15

192

00

00

45

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6805

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

191

00

06

91

185

00

12

16

184

00

10

67

183

00

00

10

170

00

18

81

169

00

00

10

172

00

03

62

171

00

01

24

175

00

00

27

176

00

01

18

165

00

04

26

तुलसीपुर

164

00

07

11

163

00

07

05

158

00

20

22

157

00

03

67

156

00

09

11

155

00

07

85

154

00

10

71

149

00

00

52

14.

जाफरपुर

396

00

19

01

397

00

01

62

399

00

00

23

388

00

16

79

385

00

00

37

384

00

16

45

381

00

12

94

365

00

00

36

6806

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

372

00

12

69

345

00

00

46

346

00

15

07

344

00

00

28

343

00

00

60

347

00

00

36

322

00

10

31

323

00

12

15

326

00

18

77

327

00

00

18

332

00

07

44

जाफरपुर

331

00

02

91

330

00

05

16

15.

भागीपुर

445

00

00

36

443

00

12

46

442

00

01

83

430

00

00

36

420

00

09

16

421

00

13

26

417

00

00

68

408

00

05

34

409

00

08

43

407

00

00

12

406

00

00

49

405

00

01

21

404

00

00

36

411

00

07

91

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6807

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

403

00

00

37

393

00

12

32

392

00

03

10

394

00

01

69

395

00

00

81

396

00

05

24

601

00

05

83

602

00

04

67

603

00

00

80

600

00

06

86

598/717

00

00

28

भागीपुर

605

00

22

08

590

00

00

36

592

00

00

57

593

00

16

44

583

00

00

10

582

00

09

67

655

00

10

24

656

00

02

51

657

00

08

44

658

00

14

10

682

00

00

10

683

00

00

10

681

00

13

82

680

00

01

16

699

00

27

96

703

00

00

10

6808

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

कर्म सं.

गांव का नाम

ख़सरा सं.

क्षेतर्फल

हेक्टेयर

एयर

वगर् मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

704

00

00

10

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)20/2018-ओआर-I/ई-27595]

नोवस िकन् डो, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 11th December, 2018

S.O. 1771.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the

transportation of petroleum products from Tundla Terminal to Kanpur Terminal should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation

Limited. And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is

necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals

Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land ) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its

intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty–one days from the date on which the

copies of this notification, as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the General Public, object in writing

to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under the land to Competent Authority, Indian Oil

Corporation Limited ( Pipelines Division), Construction Office, Northern Region Pipelines, Tundla-Gawria Pipeline

Project, E-160,1st & 2nd floor, Kamlanagar, Agra (U.P.) – 282 004.

SCHEDULE

Tehsil:- Saifai

District:- Etawah

State :- Uttar Pradesh

Sl.

No.

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

1.

Viyari Bhatpura

2

00

00

10

3

00

14

27

7

00

05

61

8

00

03

60

9

00

20

83

12

00

05

80

28

00

12

06

29

00

17

02

30

00

07

02

31

00

00

10

46

00

15

33

47

00

05

85

45

00

07

26

92

00

09

09

103

00

12

41

102

00

10

95

101

00

10

90

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6809

Sl.

No.

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

100

00

00

36

99

00

10

22

207

00

25

94

187

00

02

15

190

00

16

48

201

00

10

99

194

00

00

62

193

00

11

47

195

00

18

04

183

00

17

71

172

00

62

33

163

00

00

10

164

00

01

19

165

00

02

84

171

00

02

05

169

00

03

81

173

00

02

00

2.

Jhingupur

35

00

22

73

34

00

18

55

33

00

17

06

181

00

09

57

Jhingupur

180

00

20

46

203

00

52

98

202

00

00

14

204

00

18

63

206

00

00

10

3.

Chaubeypur

10

00

08

39

9

00

09

02

8

00

02

12

39

00

00

17

40

00

19

75

41

00

00

37

4.

Geenja

519

00

00

42

520

00

03

92

521

00

11

59

522

00

07

19

526

00

16

57

527

00

09

16

531

00

10

86

532

00

03

44

6810

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Sl.

No.

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

586

00

17

77

533

00

00

21

585

00

01

78

583

00

00

10

584

00

16

66

588

00

00

34

590

00

23

54

603

00

13

17

602

00

01

51

600

00

11

64

599

00

20

21

611

00

00

10

612

00

00

29

613

00

00

36

666

00

00

10

669

00

10

57

668

00

04

80

667

00

12

44

674

00

00

67

687

00

22

54

706

00

18

97

Geenja

705

00

08

32

1006

00

00

42

1001

00

18

32

999

00

31

01

1019

00

00

10

993

00

05

77

992

00

11

63

991

00

20

12

989

00

08

87

988

00

06

39

987

00

17

10

986

00

00

30

985

00

07

18

5.

Tirkarabacha

11

00

07

68

N. Subhan

10

00

17

86

104

00

00

10

103

00

00

10

102

00

00

10

9

00

10

30

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6811

Sl.

No.

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

106

00

09

97

108

00

07

19

99

00

11

99

110

00

00

50

98

00

31

57

95

00

12

39

155

00

30

14

154

00

00

10

156

00

17

51

157

00

08

11

6.

Lachhwai

297

00

20

26

296

00

00

10

310

00

31

64

311

00

00

55

313

00

15

47

329

00

54

09

319

00

00

52

322

00

30

58

476

00

25

12

477

00

01

80

478

00

08

72

Lachhwai

479

00

00

41

480

00

05

97

481

00

09

47

482

00

00

10

488

00

34

93

487

00

00

68

490

00

13

41

489

00

05

33

492

00

02

15

493

00

04

66

500

00

04

06

498

00

04

31

499

00

01

89

497

00

09

53

496

00

00

17

600

00

00

10

502

00

00

55

599

00

00

74

598

00

05

76

6812

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Sl.

No.

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

596

00

07

19

597

00

01

46

602

00

00

50

603

00

17

68

594

00

15

23

593

00

00

23

606

00

01

55

592

00

08

09

608

00

02

11

978

00

12

39

979

00

29

40

996

00

06

50

997

00

08

76

1005

00

08

60

995

00

00

10

1006

00

08

15

1008

00

00

10

1009

00

00

10

994

00

12

72

1007

00

02

05

1010

00

10

55

Lachhwai

1020

00

01

27

1021

00

13

68

1023

00

02

41

1022

00

05

27

903

00

12

79

902

00

08

88

901

00

01

31

900

00

12

79

873

00

06

99

899

00

03

58

898

00

09

57

887

00

02

17

896

00

00

72

895

00

00

20

888

00

15

12

894

00

00

10

893

00

00

10

892

00

02

42

891

00

02

49

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6813

Sl.

No.

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

854

00

03

27

851

00

01

14

844

00

00

20

852

00

01

00

853

00

04

65

856

00

01

74

839

00

00

76

837

00

03

57

838

00

00

26

836

00

04

13

834

00

18

55

835

00

00

10

833

00

26

23

826

00

01

00

832

00

00

10

812

00

31

08

813

00

08

45

814

00

00

10

7.

Narhauli Bhidarua

22

00

22

87

25

00

01

27

24

00

00

60

Narhauli Bhidarua

23

00

04

70

28

00

00

10

30

00

00

77

29

00

32

83

321

00

01

25

334

00

08

26

335

00

17

16

340

00

11

50

341

00

06

19

508

00

01

86

495

00

29

62

496

00

14

15

497

00

02

59

8.

Pindari

198

00

01

09

1156

00

07

33

1157

00

03

06

1158

00

18

02

1159

00

14

96

1150

00

05

58

6814

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Sl.

No.

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

1147

00

00

58

1146

00

06

21

9.

Kakrara

68

00

10

47

66

00

03

34

67

00

01

41

65

00

12

98

61

00

01

18

64

00

06

14

63

00

10

82

88

00

00

85

96

00

22

78

95

00

09

07

131

00

08

24

129

00

17

59

127

00

16

64

125

00

15

94

10.

Usrai

285

00

03

87

283

00

22

26

282

00

00

21

276

00

00

41

275

00

02

32

Usrai

274

00

07

48

273

00

00

45

272

00

12

28

139

00

03

29

145

00

11

28

143

00

00

90

144

00

01

18

146

00

12

77

147

00

37

80

148

00

64

24

100

00

00

50

85

00

00

10

173

00

40

19

177

00

06

99

178

00

11

90

169

00

01

17

219

00

05

91

215

00

00

66

214

00

00

33

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6815

Sl.

No.

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

218

00

00

11

213

00

04

61

212

00

04

31

211

00

00

59

209

00

10

19

208

00

10

47

228

00

00

65

238

00

10

67

237

00

02

11

233

00

00

10

235

00

00

10

240

00

05

96

246

00

21

04

11.

Kumhavar

165

00

00

38

169

00

00

10

168

00

15

53

166

00

00

91

167

00

06

93

172

00

05

25

173

00

05

85

175

00

05

27

Kumhavar

176

00

05

77

180

00

09

95

179

00

00

22

181

00

04

28

182

00

00

10

185

00

06

70

194

00

02

39

192

00

01

69

195

00

01

95

196

00

00

60

529

00

00

67

518

00

00

10

530

00

00

10

531

00

08

72

533

00

03

12

534

00

00

10

560

00

43

06

572

00

00

36

573

00

06

87

6816

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Sl.

No.

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

574

00

06

50

571

00

00

10

644

00

03

46

642

00

00

10

643

00

03

89

631

00

00

10

630

00

00

10

625

00

00

22

626

00

13

30

627

00

02

01

628

00

00

10

622

00

10

92

612

00

13

86

610

00

10

72

609

00

05

33

12.

Laungpur

29

00

01

24

30

00

01

38

33

00

02

37

32

00

17

63

72

00

01

57

73

00

11

30

Laungpur

74

00

04

56

75

00

08

39

76

00

03

94

77

00

03

70

78

00

03

65

81

00

00

10

83

00

05

31

82

00

00

72

133

00

01

50

136

00

01

20

137

00

04

18

138

00

06

76

142

00

04

13

143

00

00

67

145

00

05

77

147

00

03

04

148

00

02

66

229

00

04

11

227

00

01

62

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6817

Sl.

No.

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

231

00

01

36

232

00

01

54

233

00

01

38

235

00

03

53

237

00

15

91

238

00

00

36

230

00

00

10

239

00

10

22

240

00

10

22

241

00

02

07

13.

Tulsipur

202

00

00

10

201

00

02

74

200

00

13

73

199

00

00

70

198

00

00

15

192

00

00

45

191

00

06

91

185

00

12

16

184

00

10

67

183

00

00

10

170

00

18

81

Tulsipur

169

00

00

10

172

00

03

62

171

00

01

24

175

00

00

27

176

00

01

18

165

00

04

26

164

00

07

11

163

00

07

05

158

00

20

22

157

00

03

67

156

00

09

11

155

00

07

85

154

00

10

71

149

00

00

52

14.

Jafarpur

396

00

19

01

397

00

01

62

399

00

00

23

388

00

16

79

385

00

00

37

6818

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Sl.

No.

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

384

00

16

45

381

00

12

94

365

00

00

36

372

00

12

69

345

00

00

46

346

00

15

07

344

00

00

28

343

00

00

60

347

00

00

36

322

00

10

31

323

00

12

15

326

00

18

77

327

00

00

18

332

00

07

44

331

00

02

91

330

00

05

16

15.

Bhagipur

445

00

00

36

443

00

12

46

442

00

01

83

430

00

00

36

420

00

09

16

Bhagipur

421

00

13

26

417

00

00

68

408

00

05

34

409

00

08

43

407

00

00

12

406

00

00

49

405

00

01

21

404

00

00

36

411

00

07

91

403

00

00

37

393

00

12

32

392

00

03

10

394

00

01

69

395

00

00

81

396

00

05

24

601

00

05

83

602

00

04

67

603

00

00

80

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6819

Sl.

No.

Name of the Village

Khasara No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

600

00

06

86

598/717

00

00

28

605

00

22

08

590

00

00

36

592

00

00

57

593

00

16

44

583

00

00

10

582

00

09

67

655

00

10

24

656

00

02

51

657

00

08

44

658

00

14

10

682

00

00

10

683

00

00

10

681

00

13

82

680

00

01

16

699

00

27

96

703

00

00

10

704

00

00

10

[F. No. R-11025(11)20/2018/OR-I/E-27595]

NOAS KINDO, Under Secy.

6820

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

7000 GI/2017

Je ,oa jkstxkj ea=ky;

ubZ fnYyh] 30 vDrwcj] 2018

dk-vk- 1772 -&औ᳒ोिगक िववाद अिधिनयम. 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण मᱶ केन्दर्ीय सरकार,

मेससर् िव᳒ुत मापने के उपकरणᲂ के िडजाइन संस्थान के पर्बंधतंतर् के संब᳍ िनयोजकᲂ और उनके कमर्कारᲂ के बीच अनुबंध मᱶ

िनिद᳥ औ᳒ोिगक िववाद मᱶ केन्दर्ीय सरकार औ᳒ोिगक अिधकरण एवं शर्म न्यायालय स. 2, िदल्ली के पंचाट (संदभर्

संख्या 44/2012) को पर्कािशत करती है जो केन्दर्ीय सरकार को 12.10.2018 को पर्ा᳙ हुआ था।

[सं. एल&42012/04/2012-आईआर (डीयू)]

राजᱶदर् जोशी, उप िनदेशक

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

New Delhi, the 30th October, 2018

S.O. 1772.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (ID No. 44/2012) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum

Labour

Court

No. 2, Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the M/s.

Institute for Design of Electrical Measuring Instruments, and their workman, which was received by the Central

Government on 12.10.2018.

[No. L-42012/04/2012 IR (DU)]

RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 2, MUMBAI

PRESENT : M. V. Deshpande, Presiding Officer

REFERENCE NO.CGIT-2/ 44 of 2012

EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF INSTITUTE FOR DESIGN OF ELECTRICAL

MEASURING INSTRUMENTS

The Principal Director,

Institute for Design of Electrical Measuring

Instruments, Swatantraveer Tatya Tope Marg,

Chunabhatti, Sion,

Mumbai – 400 022.

AND

THEIR WORKMEN

Shri Anil Kamlakar Thakur,

596/8, Bhonwada Gaon,

Jerbai Wadia Road,

Parel,

Mumbai – 400 012.

APPEARANCES:

FOR THE EMPLOYER

:

Mr. Umesh Nabar Advocate

FOR THE WORKMEN

:

Mr. J. H. Sawant Advocate

Mumbai, dated the 11th September, 2018

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6821

AWARD PART – I

1.

This is reference made by the Central Government in exercise of powers under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and

sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 vide Government of India, Ministry of Labour&

Employment, New Delhi vide its order No. L-42012/04/2012 – IR (DU) dated 09.10.2012. The terms of reference given

in the schedule are as follows :

“Whether the action of the management of Institute for Design of Electrical Measuring Instruments,

Mumbai in terminating the services of Shri Anil Kamlakar Thakur by way of penalty of dismissal from

service vide order dt. 29.9.2010 is legal, just and proper ? If not, what relief the concerned workman is

entitled to ?“

2.

After the receipt of the reference, both the parties were served with the notices. They appeared through their

respective representatives.

3.

The concerned workman has filed statement of claim Ex.5. According to the second party workman, he was

employed by the management in the post of ‘Mistry’ [Tool & Die Maker] w.e.f. 7.10.96. He was permanent employee of

the first party and his service record was unblemished. The first party in & around the last week of September 2006

without any approval and sanction of the concerned authority had alleged to have fixed CCTV Camera in the Workshop

and on 30.9.06 the Principal Director of the first party informed that the aforesaid CCTV Camera was removed / stolen

by some person. The Principal Director made a complaint to Nehru Nagar Police Station, Kurla, Mumbai on 1.10.06.

The Principal Director of the first party thereafter suspended Shri C.M. Narsude, Leader, Trade Union for his alleged

involvement in removal / theft of CCTV Camera and initiated the enquiry against him. However, in the first week of

November 2006, the Principal Director of the first party assured him that if he would give in writing and thereby admits

his involvement in removal / theft of CCTV Camera and tender an unconditional apology to the Principal Director then

the Principal Director would withdraw the enquiry initiated against Mr. Narsude. On the aforesaid assurance given by

the Principal Director of the first party, second party agreed to give in writing that he was involved in the removal of

alleged CCTV Camera and demanded apology. On 14.11.06, Principal Director of the first party forced the second party

to write the aforesaid writing on paper and to sign the same on the proposal of assurance by the Principal Director.

Thereafter on 21.11.06 and 1.12.06, the Principal Director of the first party forced the second party to give in writing by

saying that the earlier writing was not sufficient and then submitted the writing given by the second party to the

Investigating Officer of the police station. As such the first party has also served with charge sheet for alleged

involvement of the second party in removal / theft of CCTV Camera. The second party workman replied the charge

sheet, denying the allegations and the charges leveled against him.

4.

According to the concerned workman, the Principal Director put the back date i.e. 10.1.07 on the written given

by the concerned workman and same was shown as reply to the charge sheet dt. 8.1.07 in place of original reply given by

the second party. However, the Enquiry Officer failed and neglected to consider the documentary evidence relied upon

by the second party. As such the findings of the E.O. are perverse.

5.

It is also a case of the concerned workman that the findings of the E.O. are based on no evidence. There is no

proof to show that CCTV Camera was purchased and put in the workshop of the first party. He even recorded the

conversation between the Principal Director of the first party and he himself which was recorded by him in his cell phone

and same was produced as evidence during the enquiry before the E.O. However, the E.O. failed to consider the same

while arriving at conclusion of enquiry proceedings.

6.

It is also a case of the concerned workman that Principal Director of the first party had several times called the

second party and he has produced the list of incoming calls showing that the Principal Director of the first party

pressurized him to sign the documents. However, the E.O. did not consider the same. He also recorded the instructions

and conversations between advocate Mrs. Archana Srivastava and he himself on his cell phone and the same was

produced during the enquiry before the E.O. However, the E.O. neglected to consider the same.

7.

It is also a case of the concerned workman that the enquiry was farce and even adequate subsistence allowance

was not paid to him during the period of his suspension. The principles of natural justice were not at all followed while

conducting the enquiry proceedings. The E.O. was biased against him. The enquiry conducted by the E.O. was not fair

& proper and as such on the basis of perverse findings of the E.O. the Principal Director of the first party by his order dt.

29.9.10 dismissed him from services w.e.f. 29.9.10. He then preferred appeal dt. 14.10.10 before the Appellate Authority

passed by the Principal Director of the first party. However, the Appellate Authority by its order dt. 11.3.11 rejected the

appeal without affording reasonable opportunity of hearing.

8.

It is thus the case of the concerned workman that he was dismissed from the services w.e.f. 29.9.10 by the

Principal Director of the first party in gross violation of principles of natural justice and as such the order of dismissal dt.

29.9.10 is bad in law. He is therefore asking for reinstatement in service with full back wages and all consequential

benefits, costs & compensation.

9.

The first party management resisted claim by filing written statement Ex.9. It is contended that the concerned

workman was issued charge sheets dt. 8.1.07 & 20.12.07 wherein he was appraised of several acts of misconduct alleged

to have been committed by him. Domestic enquiry was initiated and he was called by upon to plead & defend himself in

the enquiry. He was given ample opportunity by the E.O. in the said enquiry and thereafter the E.O. after recording the

entire proceedings of the enquiry gave his findings on 1.9.10 wherein the E.O. held that the charges leveled against 2nd

party were proved satisfactorily. The first party on going through the notes & findings of the E.O. found no other

6822

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

extenuating circumstances in favour of the concerned workman to take the lenient view in the matter and therefore by

letter dt. 29.9.10 terminated the services of the 2nd party.

10.

It is then contented by the first party that the management of the entire institute is controlled, managed and

administered by the Principal Director who is appointed by the Govt. of India. Therefore the Principal Director in the

interest of institute had decided to install CCTV Camera in the Workshop. The Principal employer has authority to

install CCTV Camera inside the premises of the institute. The said installation work was completed on 13.9.06.

However, the CCTV Camera so installed inside the Workshop was found to be missing on 13.9.06 and on seeing the

scene last recorded by the camera, it was found that 2nd party i.e. concerned workman along with Shri Baglane were seen

coming towards the camera. Accordingly, the first party informed to the police of the theft of said CCTV Camera and

police made enquiry as regards the theft of camera.

11.

It is then case of the first party that the 2nd party issued charge sheet enumerating the charges especially the act

of theft which has taken place in the premises of first party on 13.9.06. The enquiry came to be instituted against the 2nd

party. The 2nd party on 1.12.06 gave written statement wherein he has admitted having committed act of theft of CCTV

Camera. As such the 2nd party has on his own by his letter dt. 10.1.07 gave written confession and he has also tendered

an apology to that effect.

12.

It is then contention of the first party that 2nd party workman has participated in the enquiry initiated against

him. He had extensively cross examined witnesses of the first party. The enquiry has been conducted in most fair &

reasonable manner as per the principles of natural justice. Sufficient opportunities have been given to the 2nd party by the

E.O. to defend and plead himself in the enquiry. It is thus denied by the first party that the Principal Director had called

the 2nd party with intention to compel him to sign on the documents and give false statement in the enquiry as alleged.

13.

It is then contented by the first party that the subsistence allowance was paid to the concerned workman as per

the provisions of law and therefore the said termination of the concerned workman on the basis of findings of E.O. is not

illegal, improper or unjustified. Therefore the 2nd party workman is not entitled to any relief of reinstatement with full

back wages, continuity of service etc. it has thus sought dismissal of the reference.

14.

Following issues are framed at Ex.10. Issue No.1 & 2 are to be treated as preliminary issues. Hence I reproduce

the Issue No.1 & 2 along with my findings thereon for the reasons to follow:

Sr. No.

Issues

Findings

1

Whether the inquiry held against the workman under reference is fair and

proper ?

Yes

2.

Whether the findings of the Inquiry Officer are perverse ?

No

Reasons

Issue No.1 & 2.

15.

The 2nd party workman has filed pursis Ex.14 contending therein that he does not desire to lead oral evidence on

preliminary issues and then submitted notes of arguments on preliminary issues on the basis of enquiry proceedings.

16.

It is well settled that if the service of the employee came to be terminated after proper domestic enquiry held in

accordance with the rules of natural justice and the conclusions reached at the enquiry are not perverse, the Industrial

Tribunal is not entitled to consider the propriety or correctness of the said conclusion. But at the same time mere form of

the enquiry would not satisfy the requirements of industrial law and would protect the disciplinary action taken by the

employer from challenge. The enquiry cannot be said to have been properly held unless,

(a)

employee proceeded against has been informed clearly of the charges leveled against him.

(b)

witnesses are examined ordinarily in presence of the employee in respect of charges.

(c)

employee is given a fair opportunity to cross examine the witnesses.

(d)

he is given fair opportunity to examine witnesses including himself in his defence.

(e)

E.O. records findings with reasons for the same in his report.

Now it is to be seen whether in the present case these requirements are complied or not ?

17.

From the evidence on record, it appears that copy of imputation of misconduct, list of documents relied upon

and the list of witnesses on the basis of which charge has to be established were supplied to the concerned workman. In

the enquiry proceedings, 2nd party workman was allowed to be defended by his advocate. So now the question creeps in

whether the charge sheet suffers from vagueness ?

18.

As a matter of fact, it appears that there were two charge sheets dt. 8.1.07 and 20.12.07. On perusal of these two

charge sheets, it appears that the charges leveled against the 2nd party workman are specific to the effect that it was

noticed that the CCTV Camera installed in the Workshop was missing and during interrogation, the concerned workman

admitted that he was involved in the act of removing the said camera in combination with other workers namely S/Shri

S.S. Sonde, V.T. Baglane, B.R. Kumbhar, Vicky Desai & V.S. Suryavanshi. As such the charge sheet clearly mentions

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6823

about misconduct as per clause 24 (2) of Certified Standing Orders whereby it is alleged that there was fraud, theft,

dishonesty in connection with the employer’s business and willful damage to or loss of employer’s goods or properties

and as per clause 24 to 29, it is alleged that false statement was given before the authority knowing it to be false.

19.

In this respect it appears that even during the enquiry proceedings or in the statement of claim, the concerned

workman has not raised objection on this ground, when infact it appears that 2nd party was issued charge sheet dt. 8.1.07

and the same was served upon him on the same day by hand delivery. 2nd party submitted his written explanation in

reply to the said charge sheet through his letter dt. 10.1.07 which is at Ex.5 of the enquiry proceedings. 1st party issued

notice of enquiry to the second party workman and 4 others by letter dt. 4.5.07 fixing the enquiry on 7.5.07 and thereafter

the 2nd party workman and 4 other workmen who were charge sheeted gave the joint letter dt. 5.5.07 for postponement of

the enquiry. It appears therefore that the enquiry proceedings are not disputed by the 2nd party workman and therefore

the contention of the 2nd party workman that the charge sheet was vague does not stand to reason.

20.

It is well settled that the ground of challenge of enquiry has to be pleaded and proved. The legality and fairness

of the enquiry is challenged on the ground that the charge sheet is not issued by the competent authority. This challenge

to the legality of the enquiry is without pleading in the statement of claim. Even if some anxious consideration is given

to this objection raised by the concerned workman then it can be seen that the enquiry is to be conducted as per Certified

Standing Orders. Clause 26.2 (a) of the Certified Standing Orders clearly provides that the Secretary or any other

persons authorized to do so shall frame the charge sheet against the employee in writing setting out the alleged

misconduct. The Certified Standing Orders placed on record, have been admitted by the second party workman. That

apart it appears that resolution was passed at item No. 63 (8) of agenda giving details of delegation of powers in favour

of Chairman & Principal Director as per Annexure – IX of agenda note. It cannot be disputed that the second party was

employee in Group – C and Annexure – A. The said resolution clearly mentions that the disciplinary authority for

Group – C employees is Secretary and the Appellate Authority would be Principal Director. The copy of minutes of 63

Govt. Counsel meeting is placed on record at Sr. 2 below Ex.19. Annexure – A at page 60 shows that for Group – C or

equivalent post Secretary is the appointing authority and Principal Director is the Appellate Authority. It cannot be said

therefore that the charge sheet is not issued by the competent authority since it has been issued by the Secretary who is

the disciplinary authority so far as Group – C employees is concerned.

21.

Learned Counsel for the 2nd party workman submitted that Secretary of the first party is not disciplinary

authority of the second party who issued the charge sheet and therefore the disciplinary proceedings based upon charge

sheet issued by the incompetent authority are bad in law. He seeks to rely on the decision in case of Ananta Krishnan

V/S. Oriental Fire & General Insurance Co. Ltd. – 1988 II CJ 526 to submit that if enquiring authority had no jurisdiction

to proceed with the enquiry such a defect will not be cured on account of fact that the said order was confirmed by the

appellate authority. In that case as per General Insurance Conduct Discipline & Appeal Rules, Manager has no authority

to initiate the disciplinary action against the petitioner. The enquiry also covered larger period than was covered by the

charge. It was observed that the enquiry was absolutely without jurisdiction and illegal.

22.

In case of Desraj Verma V/s. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, U.T. Chandigarh & Anr. 2003 III CLR 880. It

was finding of the fact that there was no record to show that M.D. has delegated that authority to dismiss the petitioner

who has challenged the authority of M.D. to terminate the services.

23.

In the decision in case of Gostha Behari Jana V/S. Calcutta State Transport Corpn. & Ors. – 2000 I CLR 315. It

was considered that the employee cannot be dismissed from service by an authority subordinate to the appointing

authority. In that case the special officer who had passed the order of punishment on to the petitioner, appellant was

subordinate to the Depot Manager who had appointed the petitioner. In the circumstances it was considered that the said

order was illegal.

24.

In the decision in case of Meghraj Ragobaji Navle & Ors. V/S. Addl. Controller, Nagpur – 2002 LAB IC 9151.

The ratio of judgment is that the Addl. Controller is not the competent authority to terminate the services of temporary

employees.

25.

Here in the instant case the facts are different & distinguishable. As seen earlier clause No. 26/2 of Certified

Standing Orders provides that Secretary or any other person authorized to do so shall frame a charge against employee.

The Certified Standing Orders have been certified before the Dy. Commissioner to which the recognized union was

party. The said Certified Standing Orders were published by notification No. 362 of 1991. As such clause 62/2(A) of

Certified Standing Orders clearly provides that the Secretary is the disciplinary authority for issuing the charge sheet and

taking necessary action against the second party workman who is Group – C employee. So in the facts of present case it

cannot be said that the charge sheet is not issued by the competent authority.

26.

The another ground raised by the concerned workman is that the Principal Director who has issued the first

charge sheet dt. 8.1.07 was examined in the enquiry proceedings by the first party and in the circumstances the E.O. who

paid the fees by the Director is bound to oblige the Director Shri S.P. Rasal and accordingly the E.O. obliged him.

27.

This objection is also not sustainable in the facts of present case because as regards the charge of gherao to the

Principal Director he was the only witness to prove the charges as he was the person who was gheraod. It was necessary

for the Presiding Officer to examine him to prove the charge of gherao. Even otherwise the concerned workman was

allowed to be defended by advocate who cross examined the Principal Director who appeared as witness of first party

and that time also the concerned workman has not taken any objection during the enquiry proceedings nor this ground is

pleaded in the statement of claim. Even otherwise it can be said that if Principal Director was examined in the enquiry

6824

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

proceedings being the only witness to prove the charge of gherao then that will not be a ground to say that the enquiry

was not fair & proper.

28.

The next objection raised on behalf of the 2nd party workman is that the appointment of E.O. Dutta Patil who is

an advocate is contrary to the Certified Standing Orders. It is because the E.Os were outside persons.

29.

It is no doubt true that the Certified Standing Orders provides that the employee may be defended by his

colleague or fellow employee considering the nature of charges leveled against him. Even the Certified Standing Orders

do not bar the appointment of the outsiders or advocates as E.O. or P.O. Since the E.O. and P.O. are advocates and

considering the nature of the charges leveled against the 2nd party workman he was also to be allowed to be defended by

an advocate. It can be said therefore that no prejudice was caused to the concerned workman since he was also allowed

to be defended by an advocate. Nowhere it has been pointed out by the Learned Counsel for the concerned workman that

such an appointment of E.O. or P.O. is barred by the Certified Standing Orders. On the contrary it appears that no any

objection was raised during the enquiry proceedings in the context and for the first time in the arguments the objection

was raised which is unacceptable.

30.

The question is whether the prejudice is caused to the concerned workman because of the change of E.O. by the

first party ? E.O. was appointed by an order dt. 20.6.10 and he conducted the enquiry proceedings thereafter from

29.6.10 to 21.7.10 on 3 dates. On 21.7.10, 2nd party workman closed his evidence and submitted that he does not want to

lead any further evidence. It cannot be said therefore that due to change of the E.O. on account that he had to undergo

bypass surgery, prejudice had caused to the concerned workman.

31.

Learned Counsel for the concerned workman submitted that the conversion between the concerned workman

and the representative of the management was recorded on 31.7.07 vide Ex.25 to 35 and the reply of the concerned

workman to the charge sheet dt. 10.1.07 is back dated by the management after 31.7.07 and as such his reply dt. 10.1.07

was obtained by Principal Director of the first party under threat to the 2nd party workman and under assurance that the

disciplinary authority would not take any action against him. However, on going through the record, it appears that the

notice of the enquiry dt. 4.5.07 refers to reply to the charge sheet submitted by the 2nd party workman dt. 10.1.0. Even

otherwise the E.O. has considered the objections raised by the concerned workman and therefore the E.O. is not expected

to consider the contents of the 2nd party workman which were not raised by him during the enquiry proceedings.

32.

As regards the findings of the E.O., it was tried to point out that the defence witness Shri Vijay Changlani in his

evidence has stated that CCTV Camera was never purchased by the first party from his shop and this sort of evidence

was not taken into consideration by the E.O. Then the submission is also to the effect that the first party by its letter dt.

1.10.06 lodged a complaint with Nehru Nagar Police Station regarding loss of CCTV Camera in the Workshop and the

said complaint was withdrawn by the first party by its letter dt. 5.12.06. It is then submitted that the authentic list of

conversion with the officers of first party has not been taken on record of the enquiry proceedings and even the E.O.

ignored to give findings on these aspects. The said conversions among the 2nd party workman and advocate Ms. Archana

Srivastava, Shri S.V. Rasal and Mrs. Nachane have not been taken on record and were ignored by the E.O. while giving

his findings. With this the submission is that the findings of the E.O. are perverse and as such the E.O. did not apply his

mind to the evidence and merely recorded ipsedixit that the charges are proved. In the context, reliance is also placed in

the decision in case of Anil Kumar V/s. P.O. & Ors. – (1985) 3 SSC 378.

33.

In this respect, having gone through the enquiry proceedings it can be seen that the 2nd party workman produced

transcription of the audio recording without producing audio CD though the transcription was produced on 29.2.08. The

time was sought by the 2nd party workman to produce the CD. Even thereafter the CD was not produced on 18.3.08. It

was considered by the E.O. that the CD which was produced on 28.3.08 is not clear as regards the identification of the

persons whose talks were recorded in the C.D.

34.

Nextly, as regards the objections that the first party has withdrawn the police complaint, it was considered by

the E.O. that the complaint was withdrawn for the reasons that the first party decided to hold preliminary proceedings

against the 2nd party workman. The E.O. accordingly submitted his report on 1.9.10. As such on going through the

report of E.O., it appears to me that his findings are based on evidence.

35.

On going through the report of the E.O., it appears that it is well reasoned order holding charge No.1 to 4 as

proved. It can be said therefore that the findings of the E.O. are based on material on record and the same are not

perverse. The above issues are therefore answered accordingly as indicated against it in terms of above observations.

36.

Hence I pass the following order.

ORDER

1. Enquiry held is fair & proper.

2. Findings of the Enquiry Officer are not perverse.

3. Parties are directed to argue and lead evidence on the point of quantum of punishment.

Date: 11.09.2018

M.V. DESHPANDE, Presiding Officer

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6825

नई िदल् ली, 5 नवम् बर, 2018

का.आ. 1773.—औ᳒ोिगक िववाद अिधिनयम 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण मᱶ केन्दर्ीय सरकार

मुख्य अिभयंता (िव᳒ुत), दूरसंचार िवभाग, चंडीगढ़ एवं उनके कमर्चारी के पर्बंधतंतर् के संब᳍ िनयोजकᲂ और उनके कमर्कारᲂ

के बीच अनुबंध मᱶ िनिद᳥ औ᳒ोिगक िववाद मᱶ केन्दर्ीय सरकार औ᳒ोिगक अिधकरण एवं शर्म न्यायालय-2, चंडीगढ़ के पंचाट

(संदभर् संख्या 764/2005) को पर्कािशत करती है जो केन्दर्ीय सरकार को 30.10.2018 को पर्ा᳙ हुआ था।

[फा. सं. जेड-22019/03/2013-आईआर(सी-II)]

राजᱶदर् जोशी, उप िनदेशक

New Delhi, the 5th November, 2018

S.O. 1773.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (ID.No. 764/2005) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour

Court-2, Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Chief

Engineer (Electrical), Department of Telecom, Chandigarh and their workman, which was received by the Central

Government on 30.10.2018.

[F. No. Z-22019/03/2013-IR(C-II)]

RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

IN THE COURT OF SHRI AVTAR CHAND DOGRA : PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT No. 2, CHANDIGARH

ID No. 764/2005

Shri Upkar Singh s/o. Shri Sant Singh,

C/o. Shri Amit Sharma,

K.No.903, Sector 64, Phase XI,

Mohali,

Chandigarh.

…Workman/Claimant

Versus

The Chief Engineer (Electrical),

Deptt. Of Telecom,

SCO No,.332-34, Sector 64,

Chandigarh.

…Management

AWARD

This Award shall decide a reference which was made to this Tribunal by the Appropriate Government vide letter

No. L-40012/17/2004-IR(DU) dated 28.07.2004 under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(in short the Act) for adjudication of an industrial dispute, terms of which are as

under:

‘Whether the action of the management of Telecom now known as BSNL in terminating the services of Shri

Upkar Singh Ex-Peon w.e.f. 28/8/2001 without any notice and without complying with the provisions of the ID

Act, 1947 is just and legal ? If not, to what relief the concerned workman is entitled to and from which date ?

2.

Both parties were put to notice and the claimant Upkar Singh filed his statement of claim, with the averments

that he was engaged as a Peon by the Management on daily wage basis w.e.f. 4/4/1998 and his services were illegally

terminated on 28/8/2001 without any notice or without payment of any compensation. The workman had completed more

than 240 days of service in each calendar year. Even the persons junior to him were retained in service and thus, there is

violation of Section 25-G of the Act. The management again appointed fresh persons without giving him any priority

and violated Section 25-H of the Act. Prayer has been made for reinstatement into service with all consequential

benefits.

3.

The claim petition has been resisted by the Management who filed its reply, alleging that the claim is barred by

time as the claimant is alleging his engagement in 1998 whereas the present claim has been filed on 27/9/2004, for

which there is neither any records to show his engagement nor it can be verified. It has been alleged that the

workman was engaged in the office of Chief Engineer in the month of April, 2000 on a stop gap arrangement where he

worked upto June, 2001. According to them the workman worked for 181 days in the year 2000 and 120 days in 2001

(total for 301 days). Thereafter the contract was given to the Security Agency and the workman did not work for the

6826

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Management. There was no requirement to comply with the provisions of Section 25-F, 25-G and 25-H of the Act.

Prayer has been made for dismissal of the claim petition.

4.

In support of his case the workman appeared in the witness box and tendered his evidence by way of affidavit.

However, the Management did not lead any evidence and its evidence was closed vide order dated 17.12.2013.

5.

Perusal of the record shows that in this my learned Predecessor had passed Award dated 6.6.2014 holding that

the claimant./workman failed to prove that he was engaged as Peon on 4/4/1998 on daily wage basis and worked with the

Management till 28/8/2001 and as such it can not be said that he continuously worked for 240 days in a calendar year and

as such he was held not to be entitled to any relief. The workman/claimant assailed the Award before Hon’ble High

Court of Punjab & Haryana by filing CWP No.20536 of 2014. While observing that the claim petition vis-à-vis

annexures P-2, P-6 and P-7, has not been appraised by the Labour Court and that the workman evidently had made

necessary application for summoning the record, Hon’ble High Court vide order dated 18/4/2008 set aside the aforesaid

Award and remanded the matter back to this Tribunal with the direction to the Management to produce necessary

material/attendance record, before the Tribunal for fresh consideration of the matter.

6.

I have heard Shri Jaswinder Singh A/R for the workman and Shri Aish Babbar A/R for the Managemet and have

gone through the records carefully.

7.

There is no dispute about preposition of law that onus to prove that claimant was in the employment of

Management is always on the workman/claimant and it is for the workman to adduce evidence to prove factum of his

employment with the Management. Such evidence may be in form of receipt of salary or wages for 240 days or record

of his/her appointment or engagement for that year to show that he/she has worked with the employer for 240 days or

more in a Calendar year. In this regard, reference may be made to Batala Coop. Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. Sowaran Singh,

(2005) 8 Supreme Court Cases 481 as well as Director Fisheries Terminated Division Vs. Bhikubhai Meghajibhai

Gavda (2012) 1 SCC 47.

8.

There is hardly any dispute with the preposition of law as propounded in the aforesaid case. However, the

factual scenario in the present case is bit different, inasmuch as the Management in its written statement has clearly

admitted the factum of employment of the claimant inasmuch as it has been stated that the workman was engaged in the

office of Chief Engineer in the month of April, 2000 on a stop gap arrangement where he worked upto June, 2001. As

such, it clearly establishes relationship of employer-employee between the Management and claimant. In this regard,

reference can be made to the decision in the case of Devinder Singh Vs. Municipal Council, Sanaur, AIR 2011 Supreme

Courtt 2532, wherein the Hon’ble Apex Court while interpreting the provisions of Section 2(S) of the Act which deals

with the definition of “workman” has observed as under :-

“The source of employment, the quantum of recruitment, the terms & conditions of employment/ contract of

service, the quantum of wages/ pay and mode of payment are not at all relevant for deciding whether or not a

person is a workman within the meaning of Section 2(s) of the Act. The definition of workman also does not

make any distinction between full time and part time employee or a person appointed on contract basis. There

is nothing in the plain language of Section 2(s) from which it can be inferred that only person employed on

regular basis or a person employed for doing whole time job is a workman and the one employed on temporary,

part time or contract basis on fixed wages or as a casual employee or for doing duty for fixed hours is not a

workman.”

It is clear from the perusal of aforesaid observations that even if a person is engaged on temporary, part time or contract

basis or for doing any other kind of work and is duly paid wages for the said work, in that eventuality such a person

would be covered by the definition of “workman” as provided in Section 2(S) of the Act. In these circumstances, it stands

proved that there existed relationship of employer-employee between the parties.

9.

Equally settled is the position of law that when relationship of employer-employee stands proved between the

parties, then onus will shift upon the employer/management to show that the claimant has not worked for 240 days or

more in a calendar year or that the services of the claimant was terminated in accordance with the provisions of the Act.

It is specific case of the workman/claimant that he was engaged as a Peon by the Management on daily wage basis w.e.f.

4.4.1998 and he worked as such till 28/8/2001 when his services were illegally terminated. He in fact had completed

more than 240 days of service in each calendar year but despite that no notice or compensation in lieu of notice period

was given to him prior to termination of his services by the Management. The affidavit filed by the workman /claimant is

in line with the averments made in the claim petition. He has also filed on record copies/extracts of the Attendance

Register for the months of January to March, 1999 as Ex.W-1/1 to Ex.W-1/3. In cross examination the

claimant/workman has denied the suggestion that he had not completed 240 days or that there did not exist any dispute

because he has been paid for the period he actually worked. I may mention that the Management has not adduced any

evidence whatsoever to rebut the case of the claimant or to substantiate its stand that the workman/claimant who was

engaged in April, 2000 only had worked for 181 days prior to discontinuation of his services on 28.8.2001. It is pertinent

to mention here that the claimant/workman had filed an application dated 1.11.2006 for summoning/production of record

by the Management viz. Attendance Register, Receipts/voucher books about receipt of wages. In the reply it has been

stated that no attendance register was maintained for a person working as stop gap arrangement and moreover, the

claimant/applicant was not engaged in the year 1998. The pages of attendance register as produced by the claimant

appears to be manufactured documents. The original of Annexure W-2 is not available on record of the office.

However, photocopies of receipts/ payment vouchers for the months from April,2000 to June, 2001 have been filed on

record by the Management. It is also manifest from these receipts/payment vouchers that the claimant worked regularly

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6827

under the Management from April, 2000 to June, 2001, though he was paid wages only in respect of the official working

days. The Management has not filed on record the Attendance Register or vouchers for the remaining period so as to

rebut the claim of the claimant/workman that he worked with the Management w.e.f. 4.4.1998 till 28/8/2001 or to

substantiate its own claim that the claimant had in fact worked only for 181 days in a calendar year, The Management

has not produced the aforesaid record merely on the plea that the said record being old is not available. However, the

Management has not filed any document to show that the requisite record being old has been weeded out and if so, by

which order. In these circumstances, this Tribunal is constrained to draw adverse inference against the Management

under Section 114(g) of the Evidence Act for non production of the requisite records and to believe the version of the

claimant that he worked with the Management for over 240 days in a calendar year.

10.

There is another aspect of the matter. The claimant has filed on record photocopy of the letter dated 28/8/2001

which Shri Boota Singh, Supdt. Surveyor of Works (E) had confidentially sent to Shri P.K. Gupta, Chief Engineer

(Electrical), BSNL, Chandigarh, giving explanation about engagement of casual labourers viz. Upkar Singh during

ban period. Perusal of the said letter Annexure P-2 (now marked as Ex.C-1) shows that Shri Boota Singh,

Sudpt.Surveyr of Works had apprised Chief Engineer (Electrical) that no instruction of BSNL Headquarter stand violated

once all office staff including he (Chief Engineer) have been utilizing the services of Shri Upkar Singh continuously in

absence of responsible person posted till date and that there is no such back door entry of any person, once there is no

Peon for 3 Working Heads and 20 staff & minute by minute services of three persons as such being utilized since 1998 in

absence of three peons very much required and lastly it was stated that on his (Chief Engineer’s) direction dated

24/8/2001, Shri Upkar Singh has been asked not to attend office w.e.f. 28/8/2001. During cross-examination the

claimant clarified that he could not show the original of aforesaid letter dated 28/8/2001 as the same is in the possession

of the department but denied the suggestion that the said letter dated 28/8/2001 was fabricated & manufactured by him.

The Management has not examined either Shri Boota Singh, the then Supdt. Surveyor of Works (E) or Shri P.K. Gupta,

the then Chief Engineer (Electrical), BSNL, Chandigarh about the authenticity of the said letter, which clearly fortifies

the claim of the claimant that his services which were being utilized from 1998, were terminated only on 28/8/2001. In

view of this and as discussed above, the contention of the Management that the workman did not work for 240 days in a

calendar year does not hold ground.

11.

Now the vital question arises for consideration is whether termination of the claimant from his services by the

Management w,e.f. 28.8-2001 is in accordance with law or in violation of the provisions of Section 25-F of the Act.

According to the testimony of the workman /claimant the work of peon on which he was working was of permanent

nature and that his services were terminated by the Management in violation of Section 25-F, 25-G and 25-H of the Act.

After termination he had also approached the Management for reinstatement number of times as work was available with

the Management but all in vain. Thereafter demand notice dated 10.9.2003 was filed before Conciliation Officer. It is

neither the case of the Management that any notice or compensation in lieu of notice period was given to the claimant

prior to termination of his services w.e.f. 28/8/2001, nor any such evidence has been adduced on record by the

Management. It is reiterated that the Management did not examine any witness to rebut the case of the claimant. In

these circumstance, this Tribunal has no hesitation to hold that the services of the claimant were terminated by the

Management w.e.f. 28/8/2001 in violation of the provisions of Section 25-F of the Act.

12.

There is long line of decisions of Hon’ble Apex Court as well as of various High Courts that provisions of

Section 25-F of the Act are mandatory in nature and termination of the workman from services in derogation of the

provisions of Section 25-F of the Act will render action of the Management to be illegal and void under the law.

13.

Since there is no evidence on record that any valid notice was issued by the Management to the workman at the

time of termination or in lieu of such notice, any compensation was paid to him, as such action of the Management in

terminating the services of the workman is held to be illegal and void.

14.

Now the residual question is whether the claimant/work is entitled to any incidental relief of payment of back

wages and/or reinstatement of service with full back wages. It is proved on record that claimant was continuously in the

employment of the Management from March, 1998 to 28/8/2001 though on daily wage basis. There is no show cause

notice or memo issued to the claimant/workman by the Management. Moreover, the job of the workman is of perennial

and regular nature which fact is also apparent from the document/letter dated 28/8/2001 (Ex.C-1). Though the

workman/claimant has pleaded that he is unemployed from the date of his termination, however in his cross examination

he clarified that he used to work on daily wages as and when the work was available to him. Just because the workman

is doing some intermittent job as & when he finds work, it can not be said that he is gainfully employed to make

livelihood for himself and his family. The Management has not adduced any evidence to show that the

workman/claimant is gainfully employed.

15.

The Hon’ble Apex Court in case “Deepali Gundu Surwase v. Kranti Junior Adhyapak Mahavidyalaya”

reported as (2013) 10 SCC 324 has held as under :

“The propositions which can be culled out from the aforementioned judgments are :

i)

In cases of wrongful termination of service, reinstatement with continuity of service and back

wages is the normal rule.

ii)

Ordinarily, an employee or workman whose services are terminated and who is desirous of

getting back wages is required to either plead or at least make a statement before the

adjudicating authority or the Court of first instance that he/she was not gainfully employed or

was employed on lesser wages. If the employer wants to avoid payment of full back wages,

6828

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

then I has to plead and also lead cogent evidence to prove that the employee/workman wads

gainfully employed and was getting wages equal to the wages he/she wads drawing prior to

the termination of service. This is so because it is settled law that the burden of proof of the

existence of a particular fact lies on the person who makes a positive averments about its

existence. It is always easier to prove a positive fact than to prove a negative fact. Therefore,

once the employee shows that he was employed, the onus lies on the employer to specifically

plead and prove that the employee was gainfully employed and was getting the same or

substantially similar emoluments.”

16.

The Hon’ble Apex Court also held that different expressions are used for describing the consequence of

termination of a workman’s service/employment/engagement by way of retrenchment without complying with the

mandate of Section 25F of the Act. Sometimes it has been termed as ab initio void, sometimes as illegal per se, sometime

as nullity and sometimes as non est. Leaving aside the legal semantics, we have no hesitation to hold that termination of

service of an employee by way of retrenchment without complying with the requirement of giving one month’s notice or

pay in lieu thereof and compensation in terms of Section 25F (a) and (b) has the effect of rendering the action of the

employer and nullity and the employee is entitled to continue in employment as if his service was not terminated. (Anoop

Sharma Vs. Executive Engineer, Public Health Division No.1 Panipat (2010) 5 SCC 497).

17.

A Bench of three Judges of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Hindustan Tin Works Private Limited v.

Employees of Hindustan Tin Works Private Limited (1979) 2 SCC 80 held that relief of reinstatement with continuity of

service can be granted where termination of service is found to be invalid. It would mean that the employer has taken

away illegally the right to work of the workman contrary to the relevant law or in breach of contract and simultaneously

deprived the workman of his earnings. If thus the act of employer is found to be totally illegal and arbitrary, in that

eventuality the workman is required to be reinstated, with full back wages. Plain common sense also dictates that the

removal of an order terminating the services of workmen must ordinarily lead to the reinstatement of the services of the

workmen alongwith payment of back wages.

18.

However, Hon’ble Apex Court in the case General Manager, Haryana Roadways Vs. Rudan Singh,

reported as 2005 SCC (L&S) 716 observed as under :-

“8. There is no rule of thumb that in every case where the Industrial Tribunal gives a finding that the termination

of service was in violation of Section 25-F of the Act, entire back wages should be awarded. A host of factors

like the manner and method of selection and appointment i.e. whether after proper advertisement of the vacancy

or inviting applications from the employment exchange, nature of appointment namely, whether ad hoc, short

term, daily wage, temporary or permanent in character, any special qualification required for the job and the like

should be weighed and balanced in taking a decision regarding award of back wages. One of the important

factors which has to be taken into consideration is the length of service, which the workman had rendered

with the employer. If the workman has rendered a considerable period of service and his services are

wrongfully terminated, he may be awarded full or partial back wages keeping in view the fact that at this age

and the qualification possessed by him he may not be in a position to get another employment. However,

where the total length of service rendered by a workman is very small, the award of back wages for the

complete period i.e. from the date of termination till the date of the award, which our experience shows is

often quite large, would be wholly inappropriate. A regular service of permanent character cannot be

compared to short or intermittent daily wage employment though it may be for 240 days in a calander year.”

19.

Having regard to the legal position as discussed above and the fact that the claimant was performing duty to a

post of regular and perennial nature, this Tribunal is of the firm view that the claimant herein is entitled for

reinstatement into service on the same post, with 50 per cent back wages, iinasmuch as termination of the

claimant/workman is per-se illegal, particularly when the job is of regular and perennial nature and the

claimant/workman is not gainfully employed anywhere since after her termination by the Management. Award is passed

accordingly.

Date : 17.10.18

AVTAR CHAND DOGRA, Presiding Officer

नई िदल् ली, 26 नवम् बर, 2018

का.आ. 1774.—औ᳒ोिगक िववाद अिधिनयम 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण मᱶ केन्दर्ीय सरकार

िनदेशक, एम्स, नई िदल्ली और अन्य एवं उनके कमर्चारी के पर्बंधतंतर् के संब᳍ िनयोजकᲂ और उनके कमर्कारᲂ के बीच अनुबंध मᱶ िनिद᳥

औ᳒ोिगक िववाद मᱶ केन्दर्ीय सरकार औ᳒ोिगक अिधकरण एवं शर्म न्यायालय-2, चंडीगढ़ के पंचाट (संदभर् संख्या 25/2014) को

पर्कािशत करती है जो केन्दर्ीय सरकार को 30.10.2018 को पर्ा᳙ हुआ था।

[सं. जेड&22019/03/2013-आईआर(सी-II)]

राजᱶदर् जोशी, उप िनदेशक

New Delhi, the 26th November, 2018

S.O. 1774.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (ID. No. 25/2014) of the Central Government Industrial-Tribunal-cum

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6829

Labour Court-2, Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to

the Director, AIIMS, New Delhi & others and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on

30.10.2018.

[No. Z-22019/03/2013-IR(C-II)]

RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

IN THE COURT OF SHRI AVTAR CHAND DOGRA : PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT No. 2 : CHANDIGARH

ID No. 25/2014

Mangal Singh,

S/o. late Kalyan Singh,

R/o. 71/1, LR Sharma Building,

Lower Sangti Summer Hills,

Shimla (HP).

…Workman/Claimant

Versus

1. The Director, AIIMS,

Ansari Nagar, New Delhi.

2. Senior Administrative Officer,

Estate Section, AIIMS,

Ansari Nagar, New Delhi.

3. Care Taker,

Raj Kumari Amrit Kaur Bhawan

Guest House, Summer Hills,

Shimla -5

…Management

AWARD

This award shall decide a reference which was made to this Tribunal by the appropriate Government vide its

letter No. L-42012/129/2014-IR(DU) dated 28.10.2014 under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of

Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(in short the Act) for adjudication of an industrial dispute, terms of which

are as under:

‘Whether the claimant Shri Mangal Singh leaving his job voluntarily w.e.f. 20.01.2014 and acceptance of

Management is justified and legal ? If not, what relief the workman entitled to and from which date?’’

2.

Both parties were put to notice and the claimant/workman Mangal Singh filed his statement of claim, with the

averments that he was engaged in the Guest House of the Management at Shimla as Cook on contract basis for a period

of six months w.e.f. 1/5/2012 and his tenure was extended from time to time, though no appointment letter has been

issued. He was performing his duties efficiently and regularly from 7 am to 9 pm. daily. It has been alleged that the

workman had asked the Management N.3 for two days’ leave on 3/1/2014 to get treatment of his ailing son who was

admitted in Deen Dayal Memorial Hospital but instead of granting leave the Management No.3 asked him to go from the

Guest House and his services were terminated on 4/1/2014 verbally and illegally in violation of Section 25-F of the Act.

On next date when he reported for duty, he was not allowed to enter the Guest House and to perform his duty. It has

also been alleged that though he completed more than 240 days in a calendar year, his services have been illegally

terminated in violation of Section 25-F of the Act , without issuing any show cause notice and without any compensation.

Prayer has been made for reinstatement into service with full back wages.

3.

Managements filed their joint written statement with the objection that the workman did not turn up to his work

voluntarily w.e.f. 1/1/2014 without any notice in advance and he had sent a letter dated 20/1/2014, intimating that he had

been engaged elsewhere and he has no objection on engagement of someone in his place and that he left the work

voluntarily. As such there is no no violation of the provisions of Section 25-F of the Act. Prayer has been made for

dismissal of the claim petition. Copy of the said letter dated 20/1/2014 has been filed on record.

4.

The claimant filed rejoinder wherein he denied the allegations of the Management and reiterated his own cases

as set up in the claim petition. It has been alleged that the claimant had never left his job at his own level, however,

under the pressure of Caretaker of RKAK Guest Hue, he left the work of cook and as such this is a case of retrenchment

and the Management had voluntarily terminated the services of the claimant without any reasons and rhyme. The

Caretaker pressurised the claimant to sign on blank papers as the same was required for release of his monthly salary.

5.

Perusal of the record shows that after filing of the written statement, the Management opted not to participate in

the proceedings and hence the matter was proceeded ex parte against the Management vide order dated 28/6/2016.

6830

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

6.

In order to prove his case, the claimant filed his evidence by way of affidavit (now marked as Ex.C-1) and his

testimony is in line with the averments made in the claim petition. In his pleadings and affidavit filed on record, the

claimant has specifically deposed that he had never left his job rather under the pressure of Caretaker of RKAK, Guest

House to sign on blank paper, as same was required by the Management at Delhi for release of his monthly salary.

According to his testimony, under the genuine belief, the workman had signed on the blank paper wherein reason for

leaving the job bty some other person was written. He also deposed that the Management had voluntarily terminated his

services without any reason and rhyme. The testimony of the claimant has gone unchallenged and unrebutted. The

Management has neither adduced any evidence in rebuttal to prove its case that the workman/claimant had himself

abandon the job, nor has proved the letter dated 20/1/2014 allegedly written by the workman voluntarily. Under these

circumstances, it can not be concluded that the claimant had himself abandon the job of the Management w.e.f.

20/1/2014 and that his services were legally terminated by the Management. The Management has not adduced any

evidence to show that before terminating the services of the workman, any notice or compensation in lieu of notice

period was given to the workman. This amounts to violation of the provisions of Section 25-F of the Act.

7.

There is long line of decisions of Hon’ble Apex Court as well as of various High Courts that provisions of

Section 25-F of the Act are mandatory in nature and termination of the workman from services in derogation of the

provisions of Section 25-F of the Act will render action of the Management to be illegal and void under the law.

8.

Since there is no evidence on record that any valid notice was issued by the Management to the workman at the

time of termination or in lieu of such notice, any compensation was paid to him, as such action of the Management in

terminating the services of the workman is held to be illegal and void.

9.

Now the residual question for consideration is whether the claimant is entitled to any incidental relief of

payment of back wages and/or reinstatement of service. It is proved on record that claimant was in the employment of

the Management before his termination on 20/1/2014. There is no show cause notice or memo issued to the

claimant/workman by the Management. Moreover, the job of the cook in the Guest House for which post the claimant

was engaged, is/was of perennial and regular nature. During the course of arguments, the claimant was present before

this Tribunal and he stated that he is not gainfully employed after his termination. The Management has not adduced

any evidence to show that the claimant is gainfully employed somewhere else or that he is in a position to make his both

ends meet by doing any work. Even if it is assumed that the claimant is doing some intermittent or adhoc work to make

his both ends meet, that would not itself amount to gainful employment. .

10.

The Hon’ble Apex Court in case “Deepali Gundu Surwase v. Kranti Junior Adhyapak Mahavidyalaya”

reported as (2013) 10 SCC 324 has held as under :

“The propositions which can be culled out from the aforementioned judgments are :

i)

In cases of wrongful termination of service, reinstatement with continuity of service and back

wages is the normal rule.

ii)

Ordinarily, an employee or workman whose services are terminated and who is desirous of

getting back wages is required to either plead or at least make a statement before the

adjudicating authority or the Court of first instance that he/she was not gainfully employed or

was employed on lesser wages. If the employer wants to avoid payment of full back wages,

then I has to plead and also lead cogent evidence to prove that the employee/workman wads

gainfully employed and was getting wages equal to the wages he/she wads drawing prior to

the termination of service. This is so because it is settled law that the burden of proof of the

existence of a particular fact lies on the person who makes a positive averments about its

existence. It is always easier to prove a positive fact than to prove a negative fact. Therefore,

once the employee shows that he was employed, the onus lies on the employer to specifically

plead and prove that the employee was gainfully employed and was getting the same or

substantially similar emoluments.”

11.

The Hon’ble Apex Court also held that different expressions are used for describing the consequence of

termination of a workman’s service/employment/engagement by way of retrenchment without complying with the

mandate of Section 25F of the Act. Sometimes it has been termed as ab initio void, sometimes as illegal per se, sometime

as nullity and sometimes as non est. Leaving aside the legal semantics, we have no hesitation to hold that termination of

service of an employee by way of retrenchment without complying with the requirement of giving one month’s notice or

pay in lieu thereof and compensation in terms of Section 25F (a) and (b) has the effect of rendering the action of the

employer and nullity and the employee is entitled to continue in employment as if his service was not terminated. (Anoop

Sharma Vs. Executive Engineer, Public Health Division No.1 Panipat (2010) 5 SCC 497).

12.

A Bench of three Judges of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Hindustan Tin Works Private Limited v.

Employees of Hindustan Tin Works Private Limited (1979) 2 SCC 80 held that relief of reinstatement with continuity of

service can be granted where termination of service is found to be invalid. It would mean that the employer has taken

away illegally the right to work of the workman contrary to the relevant law or in breach of contract and simultaneously

deprived the workman of his earnings. If thus the act of employer is found to be totally illegal and arbitrary, in that

eventuality the workman is required to be reinstated, with full back wages. Plain common sense also dictates that the

removal of an order terminating the services of workmen must ordinarily lead to the reinstatement of the services of the

workmen alongwith payment of back wages.

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6831

13.

However, Hon’ble Apex Court in the case General Manager, Haryana Roadways Vs. Rudan Singh,

reported as 2005 SCC (L&S) 716 observed as under :-

“8. There is no rule of thumb that in every case where the Industrial Tribunal gives a finding that the termination

of service was in violation of Section 25-F of the Act, entire back wages should be awarded. A host of factors

like the manner and method of selection and appointment i.e. whether after proper advertisement of the vacancy

or inviting applications from the employment exchange, nature of appointment namely, whether ad hoc, short

term, daily wage, temporary or permanent in character, any special qualification required for the job and the like

should be weighed and balanced in taking a decision regarding award of back wages. One of the important

factors which has to be taken into consideration is the length of service, which the workman had rendered

with the employer. If the workman has rendered a considerable period of service and his services are

wrongfully terminated, he may be awarded full or partial back wages keeping in view the fact that at this age

and the qualification possessed by him he may not be in a position to get another employment. However,

where the total length of service rendered by a workman is very small, the award of back wages for the

complete period i.e. from the date of termination till the date of the award, which our experience shows is

often quite large, would be wholly inappropriate. A regular service of permanent character cannot be

compared to short or intermittent daily wage employment though it may be for 240 days in a calander year.”

14.

Having regard to the legal position as discussed above and the fact that the claimant was performing duty to a

post of regular and perennial nature, this Tribunal is of the firm view that the claimant herein is entitled for

reinstatement into service on the same post, with 50 per cent back wages, iinasmuch as termination of the

claimant/workman is per-se illegal and the claimant/workman is not gainfully employed anywhere since after his

termination by the Management. Award is passed accordingly.

Date 17.10.18

AVTAR CHAND DOGRA , Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 27 uoEcj] 2018

का. आ. 1775-&औ᳒ोिगक िववाद अिधिनयम 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण मᱶ केन्दर्ीय सरकार

पोस्ट-मास्टर जनरल, हेड पोस्ट ऑिफस, पाली और अन्य एवं उनके कमर्चारी के पर्बंधतंतर् के संब᳍ िनयोजकᲂ और उनके

कमर्कारᲂ के बीच अनुबंध मᱶ िनिद᳥ औ᳒ोिगक िववाद मᱶ केन्दर्ीय सरकार औ᳒ोिगक अिधकरण एवं शर्म न्यायालय, जोधपुर के

पंचाट (संदभर् संख्या 01/2016) को पर्कािशत करती है जो केन्दर्ीय सरकार को 06.09.2018 को पर्ा᳙ हुआ था ।

[सं. एल&40011/25/2014-आईआर (डीयू)]

राजᱶदर् जोशी, उप िनदेशक

New Delhi, the 27th November, 2018

S.O. 1775.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (I.D. No. 01/2016) of the Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Jodhpur as

shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Post-Master General, Head Post

Office, Pali & others and their workman, which were received by the Central Government on 06.09.2018.

[No. L-40011/25/2014-IR (DU)]

RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director

vuqca/k

vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] tks/kiqj ¼jkt-½

ihBklhu vf/kdkjh & Jh vt; dqekj 'kekZ&1

vkj-,p-ts-,l-

vkS|ksfxd fookn ¼dsUnzh;½ la[;k% 01@2016

HkWojflag iq= Lo-Jh jkeiky flag] mez 52 o"kZ] HkwriwoZ nSfud osru

Hkksxh okVjeSu ¼xzqi&Mh deZpkjh½] ih-,e-ikyh gsM iksLV vkfQl

ikyh e.My] ikyh ekjokM] fuoklh 545 ckiw foLrkj]ikyh ekjokM-

---izkFkhZ

cuke

6832

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1-

iksLVekLVj tujy] gsM iksLV vkfQl ikyh ekjokM

2-

lqfizUVsUMsUV] iksLV vkfQl] ikyh ekjokM

3-

iksLV ekLVj] ,p0vks0 ikyh ekjokM

4-

;wfu;u vkQ bf.M;k tfj;s lsdzsVjh

fMikLVZesUV vkQ iksLV] fefuLVªh vkQ dE;wfuds'ku]

Mkd Hkou U;w fnYyh A

---vizkFkhZx.k

mifLFkfr%

1

izkFkhZ izfrfuf/k Jh vkyksd MksHkky mi-A

2

vizkFkhZx.k izfrfuf/k Jh 'kgukt [kkW mi-A

vf/kfu.kZ;%

fnukad% 30-06-2017

dsUnz ljdkj dh vksj ls tfj;s vf/klwpuk uEcj ,y&40011@ 25@2014&vkbZvkj ¼Mh;w½ fnukad 02-02-2015 }kjk

tks fookn vf/klwfpr fd;k x;k gS og bl izdkj gS&

**D;k izcU/ku Jheku iksLV ekLVj tujy] gsM iksLV vkfQl] lqizhUVsaUMsaV iksLV vkfQl o iksLV ekLVj ,p vks ikyh

ekjokM jkt0 }kjk deZdkj Jh HkWojflag iq= LoJh jkeiky flag dks fnukad 5-12-2011 ls lsok ls i`Fkd djus dh dk;Zokgh

oS/kkfud ,oa U;k;laxr gS] ;fn ugha rks izkFkhZ fdl jkgr dk vkSj dc ls ikus dk gdnkj gS \**

la{ksi esa rF; bl izdkj gS%&izkFkhZ us vf/klwfpr fookn ds lEcU/k esa viuk ekax i= is'k fd;kA izkFkhZ us vius ekax

i= esa dgk gS fd izkFkhZ&Jfed us vizkFkhZ fu;kstd laLFkku esa nSfud osruHkksxh deZpkjh ds :i esa okVjeSu ds :i esa lu

1990 ls fnukad 5-12-2011 rd viuh lsok, vfiZr dhA izkFkhZ ,d Jfed vkSj vizkFkhZ fu;kstd laLFkku ,d okf.kT;d o

vkS|ksfxd laLFkku gS ftu ij Je dkuwu ykxw gksrs gSA izkFkhZ&Jfed ds lkFk lkFk f'koflag ] f'koyky fi;ksu] tloUrflag

ckcw dk;Zjr FksA izkFkhZ&Jfed dks Hkqxrku isesUV okmpj ls Jfed ds inuke ls fd;k tkrk FkkA izkFkhZ&Jfed }kjk tc

le>ksrk okrkZ ds fy;s mifLFkfr jftLVj dh QksVks izfr o Hkqxrku okmpj dh QksVks izfr vizkFkhZ laLFkku ls ekaxh rks

izkFkhZ&Jfed dks miyC/k ugha djokbZ xbZ ftl ij lwpuk ds vf/kdkj ds rgr lwpuk ekaxus ij miyC/k djokbZ xbZA fnukad

7-6-2007 dks tkjh vkns'k ds vuqlkj okVj eSu dks feyus okys okVj HkRrs ds lEcU/k esa Fkk ml le; okVj eSu ds in ij

fu;qDr Jherh dykorh lsokfuo`Rr gks pqdh gS rFkk rRdkyhu v/kh{kd Jh lkseca'kh us izkFkhZ&Jfed dks eq[; dk;kZy;] ikyh

esa okVjeSu ds in ij yxk;k bl izdkj izkFkhZ&Jfed us gsM vkfQl esa okVjeSu ds in ij dk;Z djuk izkjEHk fd;kA izkFkhZ ds

eq[; dk;kZy; ds mifLFkfr jftLVj esa okVjeSu ds in ij gLrk{kj fd;s tkus yxsA izkFkhZ&Jfed ds lkFk lkFk izdk'k]

pqUuhyky] HkWojyky] eksguflag] x.ks'kjke] chatkjke] rstflag Hkh mifLFkfr jftLVj esa vius gLrk{kj djrs FksA izkFkhZ&Jfed dk

Hkqxrku isesUV okmpj ls fd;k tkrk Fkk drFkk Mh , dk Hkqxrku Hkh le; le; ij fd;k tkrk FkkA izkFkhZ&Jfed ds fof/k

fo:) lsok ls i`Fkd ds le; Hkqxrku okmpj la[;k 27 }kjk Hkqxrku fnukad 2-12-2011 dks fd;k x;k FkkA izkFkhZ dks vius

mPpkf/kdkfj;ksa ls dgk fd mls foHkkx esa dk;Z djrs gq;s 20 o"kZ ls vf/kd le; gks x;k gS mldh lsok fu;fer D;ksa ugh dh

tk jgh gS rc izkFkhZ dks vk'oklu fn;k x;k fd dk;Zokgh py jgh gS A bl ij izkFkhZ dh lsok, fu;fer djus dh ctk; mls

fnukad 5-12-2011 dks lsokeqDr dj fn;k x;kA izkFkhZ us lsok ls i`Fkd djus ls iwoZ 240 fnu fujUrj dk;Z fd;k mls /kkjk 25

,Q ds rgr u rks eqvkotk fn;k] u uksfVl fn;k u gh izkFkhZ&Jfed ls ofj"Brk lwph izdkf'kr dhA izkFkhZ&Jfed ls dfu"B

deZpkfj;ksa dks lsok esa j[kk x;kA bl izdkj vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e]1947 dh /kkjk 25&,Q]25&th ,oa 25&,p rFkk fu;e

77 o 78 ds izko/kkuksa dk mYya?ku fd;k x;k gSA izkFkhZ us Hkkjr ljdkj ds Je ea=ky;] vtesj esa fnukad 18-3-2014 dks

le>ksrk okrkZ gsrq izkFkZuk i= izLrqr fd;k ysfdu fnukad 20-5-2014 dks vizkFkh fu;kstd laLFkku us lsok esa cgky djus ls

euk dj fn;kA izkFkhZ&Jfed 21 o"kkZsZa ls okVjeSu ds in ij vizkFkhZ laLFkku esa dk;Z dj jgk gS

izkFkhZ dh vksj ls fuosnu fd;k gS fd vizkFkhZ fu;kstd ds ekSf[kd vkns'k fnukad 5-12-2011 dks fujLr Qjek;k tkos

rFkk izkFkhZ&Jfed dks lsok dh fujUrjrk esa osru rFkk lHkh iquykZHk ds lkFk lsok esa izfrLFkkfir djok;k tkos A

vizkFkhZ us vius tokc esa dgk gS fd izkFkhZ ds ekax i= esa vafdr rF;ksa ls badkj fd;k gS vkSj dgk gS fd izkFkhZ iz/kku

Mkd?kj ikyh esa iw.kZr;k ckg~; O;fDr ds :i esa ikuh Hkjus dk dk;Z dj jgk Fkk ftldks ikuh HkRrk fn;k tkrk Fkk mldks

fdlh Hkh in ij foHkkx esa fu;qfDr ugha nh xbZ] izkFkhZ iz/kku Mkd?kj ikyh esa ikuh Hkjus dk dk;Z djrk Fkk ftls ikuh HkRrk

fn;k tkrk Fkk tks fu/kkZfjr nj ls fn;k tkrk Fkk A Mkd egkfuns'kky; ubZ fnYyh ds i= fnukad 19-11-2010 dh vuqikyuk

esa ikuh Hkjus dh O;oLFkk miyC/k ,eMh,l LVkQ ls djokus ds funsZ'kkuqlkj izkFkhZ ls ikuh Hkjokuk cUn dj fn;kA izkFkhZ dks

ekg ds vUr esa fd;s x;s dk;Z ds vuqlkj ikuh HkRrk ,lhth&17 ij fd;k tkrk Fkk rFkk izkFkhZ ds uke ls dksbZ Hkqxrku

okmpj vyx ls tkjh ugh fd;k tkrk Fkk u gh mifLFkfr ckcr~ dksbZ fo'ks"k jftLVj j[kk tkrk FkkA ikyh iz/kku Mkd?kj esa

okVjeSu dk dksbZ in ugha Fkk rks ml ij mifLFkfr jftLVj esa gLrk{kj djokuk Lohdkj ugha gSA izkFkhZ ek= ckg~; O;fDr ds

:i esa dk;Zjr Fkk vkSj mls ikuh HkRrk fn;k tkrk Fkk rFkk foHkkxh; vkns'kkuqlkj ;g O;oLFkk cUn dh xbZ FkhA ckg~;

O;fDr;ksa ds lEcU/k esa dksbZ ofj"Brk lwph tkjh ugah dh tkrh Fkh vkSj u gh fdlh dkuwu dk mYya?ku gh fd;k x;k gSA izkFkhZ

ls fu;ekuqlkj gh dk;Z djk;k tkrk Fkk vkSj fu;ekuqlkj foHkkxh; vkns'kksa ls gh mDr O;oLFkk cUn dh xbZ FkhA izkFkhZ dh

lsok,s Mkd egkfuns'kky;] ubZ fnYyh ds i= fnukad 19-11-2010 vuqlkj vDVwcj 2011 ls lekIr dh xbZA

vizkFkhZ us vius tokc esa fuonsu fd;k gS fd izkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr ekax i= [kkfjt Qjek;k tkos A

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6833

izkFkhZ }kjk vizkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr tckc dk tckcqy tckc izLrqr djrs gq;s ekax i= esa of.kZr dFkuksa dh iqf"V

dh A

izkFkhZ dh vksj ls lk{; esa Lo;a HkWojflag dk 'kiFk&i= izLrqr fd;kA ftl ij vizkFkhZx.k us izfrijh{k.k fd;kA

vizkFkhZ dh vksj ls lk{; esa Mh vkj lqFkkj] v/kh{kd Mkd?kj] ikyh e.My]ikyh ekjokM dk 'kiFk&i= izLrqr fd;kA ftl ij

izkFkhZ us izfrijh{k.k fd;kA izkFkhZ dh vksj ls izn'kZ&1 ls 8 nLrkost dh izfr;ka izLrqr dh xbZA vizkFkhZ dh vksj ls izn'kZ&,1

nLrkost dh izfr izLrqr dh xbZA

nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl lquh xbZ i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA

vf/klwfpr fookn ij izkFkhZ dh vksj ls tks lk{; vkbZ gS mlesa Lo;a izkFkhZ HkWojflag us vius 'kiFk i= esa l'kiFk ;g

dFku fd;k gS fd og vizkFkhZ fu;kstd laLFkku esa lu 1990 ls fnukd 5-12-2011 rd okVjeSu ds in ij dk;Zjr Fkk vkSj

mlus yxkrkj mDr vof/k esa fcuk fdlh O;o/kku ds lsok;s nh A izkFkhZ ,d Jfed gS vkSj vizkFkhZ laLFkk m|ksx gSA izkFkhZ dk

dguk gS fd mldh M;wVh lqcg 8 cts ls 'kke 5 cts rd Fkh mlds lkFk f'koflag] f'koyky fi;ksu ,oa tloUrflag ckcw

oxSjg dk;Z djrs Fks mldks osru dk Hkqxrku isesUV okmpj ls fd;k tkrk Fkk ftlesa mldk uke in n'kkZ;k tkrk FkkA

i=koyh esa mDr okmpj layXu gSA izkFkhZ dks vizsy] 2008 ls fnlEcj 2011 rd ds Hkqxrku okmpj dh izekf.kr izfr miyC/k

djokbZ xbZ gSA fnukd 7-6-2007 dks tkjh vkns'k ds vuqlkj okVjeSu dks feyus okys okVj ,ykmUl ds lEcU/k esa FkkA ekax

lwph ds lkFk mDr vkns'k dh izfrfyfi dks Hkh is'k fd;k gSA fu;kstd laLFkk }kjk Mh , dk Hkqxrku Hkh le; le; ij fd;k

tkrk FkkA lsok lekfIr ds le; mls isesUV okmpj la[;k 27 fnukad 2-12-2011 ds }kjk Hkqxrku fd;k x;kA mldk dguk gS

fd mlus 20 o"kZ ls vf/kd vizkFkhZ laLFkku esa dk;Z djrs gq;s gks x;s gS ysfdu mldks fu;fer ugha fd;k x;k gS vkSj fnukad

5-12-2011 dks lsok esa fu;fer djus dh ctk; mls lsok ls VfeZusV dj fn;k x;k gSA mldk dguk gS fd ekeys esa vkS|ksfxd

fookn vf/kfu;e]1947 dh /kkjk 25&,Q]25&th ,oa 25&,p o fu;e 77 o 78 dh ikyuk ugha dh xbZ gSA vr% lsok i`Fkd

vkns'k fujLr fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA izkFkhZ dh vksj ls izn'kZ 1 ls 8 nLrkost is'k fd;s gSA izkFkhZ ls vizkFkhZ ds izfrfuf/k }kjk

izfrijh{k.k fd;k x;k gSA ftlesa mlus dgk gS fd dksbZ fyf[kr fu;qfDr i= is'k ugha fd;k gS D;ksafd mls ugah fn;k x;kA

ukSdjh ds fy;s izkFkhZ us fyf[kr fueU=.k ugha Hkstk] mlus dksbZ fyf[kr izkFkZuk i= okVjeSu ds in ij fu;qDr djus ds fy;s

vizkFkhZ dks ugha fn;kA izkFkhZ HkWojflg ls bl fcUnq ij dksbZ ftjg ugha dh xbZ gS fd mlus 1990 ls fnukad 5-12-2011 rd

okVjeSu ds in ij vizkFkhZ laLFkku esa dk;Z djrs gq;s fujUrj lsok,s ugha nh gks A bl fcUnq ij Hkh dksbZ ftjg ugha dh xbZ gS

fd izkFkhZ dks osru dk Hkqxrku tfj;s okmpj fd;k tkrk Fkk tks izkFkhZ us nLrkost ds :i esa is'k fd;s gSA izkFkhZ us yxkrkj

lsok esa 240 fnol ls vf/kd vof/k esa ,d dys.Mj o"kZ esa dk;Z fd;k gSA izkFkhZ ds 21 o"kZ dh lsok vof/k esa dksbZ lsok O;o/kku

jgk gks ,slk dksbZ izfrijh{k.k ugah fd;k x;k gSA ek= fu;qfDr i= ds lEcU/k esa ftjg dh xb gS vU; dksbZ lkjHkwr ftjg ugha

dh xbZ gSA

vizkFkhZ dh vksj ls Jh Mh vkj lqFkkj dks lk{; esa is'k fd;k x;k gS ftUgksaus ;g dgk gS fd izkFkhZ iz/kku Mkd?kj

dUVhtsUV isM O;fDr ds rkSj ij ikuh Hkjus dk dk;Z djrk Fkk ftls ikuh HkRrk fn;k tkrk Fkk fdlh in ij mldh fu;qfDr

ugah dh xbZ FkhA dUVhtsUV Q.M ls izkFkhZ dks osru dk Hkqxrku fd;k x;k gks ,slk dksbZ vkns'k vFkok ,slk dksbZ fjdkWMZ

vizkFkhZ dh vksj ls is'k ugh fd;k x;k gSA ;g Hkh Lohdkj fd;k x;k gS fd ikyh iz/kku Mkd?kj esa dUVhtsUV iSM O;oLFkk ij

ikuh Hkjus dk dk;Z dj jgk Fkk tks vc eYVh VkLd LVkQ ls djok;k tk jgk gS A izkFkhZ ls ikuh Hkjokuk cUn dj fn;k x;k

gSA izkFkhZ dk lsoki`FkDdj.k vkns'k tkjh ugha fd;k x;k gSA izkFkhZ }kjk yEcs le; ls ikuh Hkjus dk dk;Z djuk Lohdkj fd;k

gSA fnukad 7-6-2007 ikuh HkRrk izfrekg Hkqxrku djus ckcr~ ek= ,d Lohd`fr vkns'k Fks bl esa fdlh in ,oa izkFkhZ ds uke dk

fooj.k vafdr ugha gSA D;ksafd izkFkhZ lu 1990 ls yxkrkj dk;Zjr FkkA izkFkhZ ckgjh O;fDr ds :i esa iz/kku Mkd?kj] ikyh ij

ikuh Hkjus dk dk;Z dj jgk FkkA vizkFkhZ ds bl xokg ls izkFkhZ ds izfrfuf/k }kjk ftjg dh xbZ gsA ftlesa mlus ;g Lohdkj

fd;k gS fd fnukad 16-2-2016 dks crkSj v/kh{kd Mkd ikyh e.My esa dk;Zjr gSA ftjg esa mlus Lohdkj fd;k gS fd izkFkhZ

iksLV ekLVj ikyh ds v.Mj esa ikuh Hkjus dk dke djrk FkkA izkFkhZ dks muds ;gka ikuh fiykus dh txg muds ;gka

dUVhtsUV ¼vkdfLed :i ls ½ yxk;k x;k FkkA izkFkhZ dks ekg dh lekfIr ij osru nsrs Fks vkSj fu;ekuqlkj mls Mh, Hkh fn;k

tkrk FkkA ;g lsysjh gsM ls fn;k tkrk FkkA izkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr izn'kZ 1 ls 4 ds ist la[;k 8 ls 65 muds foHkkx ds okmpj

gS ;g Lohdkj fd;k gS ftlesa fy[kh bckjr jgh gSA ;g Hkh Lohdkj fd;k gS fd dksbZ fu;qfDr i= tkjh ugha fd;k x;k gS

ekSf[kd :i ls yxk;k x;k FkkA gVkus ls iwoZ dksbZ uksfVl ugah fn;k x;kA ;g Hkh Lohdkj fd;k gS fd izkFkhZ us viuh fu;qfDr

frfFk 1990 ls fnukad 2-12-2011 mls gVkus tkus rd fcuk fdlh O;o/kku ds muds ;gk ikuh Hkjus dk dke fd;k gSA

mijksDr nksuksa i{kksa dh lk{; ls fLFkfr ;g mHkj dj vkrh gS fd Lohd`r :i ls izkFkhZ vizkFkhZ laLFkku esa okVjeSu ds

in ij ikuh Hkjus o ikuh fiykus dk dk;Z djrk FkkA izkFkhZ dks osru en ls osru fn;k tkrk Fkk] ;g Hkh vizkFkhZ laLFkku dh

vksj ls Lohdkj fd;k x;k gSA ;g Hkh Lohdkj fd;k x;k gS fd lu 1990 ls fnukad 5-12-2011 rd izkFkhZ us vuojr :i ls

okVj eSu ds in ij lsok, nh gS vkSj mlus 21 o"kZ dh vof/k esa vizkFkhZ laLFkku us fu;fer ugha fd;k gS cfYd mls fnukad

5-12-2011 dks fcuk fdlh uksfVl ds lsok ls i`Fkd dj fn;k gSA izkFkhZ dk dk;Z vlUrks"kizn jgk gks ,slk Hkh vizkFkhZ dh vksj ls

dksbZ lk{; izLrqr ugha dh xbZ gSA izkFkhZ ds fo:) dksbZ vuq'kklukRed dk;Zokgh dh xbZ gks ,slk Hkh vizkFkhZ dk ekeyk ugha

gSA izkFkhZ }kjk dh xbZ ikuh dh lsok yxkrkj pyus okyh lsokvksa esa ls ,d gSA vizkFkhZ laLFkku esa u dsoy LVkQ dks ikuh

fiykus dh vko';drk gksrh gS cfYd ogka vkus okys vke xzkgd dks ikuh fiykuk vR;Ur vko';d gSA izkFkhZ dks gVkdj eYVh

VkLd LVkQ QkslZ ls dke ysuk vkSj gVkus ls iwoZ mls dksbZ NaVuh eqvkotk ugha nsuk vkSj fnukad 5-12-2011 dks mls fcuk

fdlh fyf[kr lsok lekfIr vkns'k ds ekSf[kd :i ls lsok ls i`Fkd djuk vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e]1947 dh /kkjk 25,Q dk

?kksj mYya?ku gSA vizkFkhZ laLFkk dh vksj ls izkFkhZ dks lsok ls i`Fkd fd;s tkus ls iwoZ dksbZ ofj"Brk lwph ugha cukbZ xbZ gSA

izkFkhZ dks fudkyus ds i'pkr~ vU; O;fDr dks eYVh VkLd QkslZ okys dks ikuh fiykus o ikuh Hkjus ds fy;s j[kk x;k gSA vr%

izkFkhZ ds ekeys esa vizkFkhZ laLFkk us vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e]1947 dh /kkjk 25&th ,oa 25&,p ,oa fu;e 77 o 78 dk Hkh

mYya?ku fd;k gSA

6834

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

vizkFkhZ dh vksj ls ;g rdZ izLrqr fd;k x;k gS fd izkFkhZ vkdfLed deZpkjh gtS vkSj mldh fu;qfDr ikVZ VkbZe dh

xbZ gS vr% mls fu;fer lsok esa ugha fy;k tk ldrkA esjh jk; esa ;g rdZ [kkfjt fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA ekuuh; mPpre

U;k;ky; }kjk , vkbZ vkj 2011 ,l lh MCY;w ist 3455 nsosUnzflag cuke E;wfufliy dkmfUly lkuksj esa ;g fl}kUr

izfrikfnr fd;k x;k gS fd ikVZVkbZe deZpkjh] vuqcfU/kr deZpkjh] vLFkkbZ o vkdfLed deZpkjh vkS|ksfxd fookn ds rgr

*Jfed* dh Js.kh esa vkrs gSA

ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk 2016 yscj b.M0 dslst ist 3174 phQ tujy eSustj ,l ch vkbZ cuke

dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd ,oa Je U;k;ky;] pSUubZ ds ekeys eas ;g fl)kUr izfrikfnr fd;k fd Employee rendered 20

Years of service, termination of his services on ground that the work was outsourced without complying with provisions

of S. 25F. Not proper because even if an employee is temporary or daily wager, if he has successfully worked for 240

days in preceding calendar year, employee is entitled to benefit of provisions of S. 25F.

ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk 2009 ,l lh ist 309 fMfotuy eSustj U;w bf.M;k ,';ksjsUl dEiuh cuke ,0

'kadjkfyaxe] 2012 ¼132½ ,Q ,y vkj ist 571 dkuflag cuke ftyk vk;qZosn vkfQlj o vU;] ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp

U;k;ky; ds fu.kZ; jktLFkku jkT; cuke fxjhjkt izlkn ds ekeys esa o vU; fu.kZ;ksa esa ikVZVkbZe deZpkjh dks Hkh Jfed dk

ntkZ fn;k x;k gS vr% izkFkhZ vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e]1947 ds rgr laj{k.k izkIr djus dk vf/kdkjh gSA

mijksDr foospu o fof/kd izko/kkuksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq;s izkFkhZ dks fnukad 5-12-2011 dks lsok ls i`Fkd djuk mfpr

,oa oS/k ugha gSA izkFkhZ dk ekSf[kd lsok i`Fkd vkns'k fnukad 5-12-2011 vikLr fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA izkFkhZ ftl in ls gVk;k

x;k gS mlh okVjeSu ds in ij iqu% iwoZlsok 'krksZ ds vk/kkj ij iqu%fu;qfDr izkIr djus dk vf/kdkjh gSA izkFkhZ dh lsok,

fujUrj ekus tkus ;ksX; gSA izkFkhZ vf/klwfpr fookn dh frfFk fnukad 2-2-2015 ls iwoZHk`fr ds :i esa mldks fu;qDr fd;s tkus

rd 50 izfr'kr iwoZHk`fr jkf'k vizkFkhZx.k ls izkFkhZ dks fnykbZ tkuk mfpr le>k tkrk gSA izkFkhZ leLr ifjykHk mldh

fu;qfDr fnukad ls izkIr djus ;ksX; ik;k tkrk gSA

vf/kfu.kZ;%

vr% ;g vf/kfu.kZ; fd;k tkrk gS fd &

1-

izkFkhZ Jh HkWojflag iq= LoJh jkeiky flag dks fu;kstd izcU/ku Jheku iksLV ekLVj tujy] gsM iksLV vkfQl]

lqizhUVsaUMsaV iksLV vkfQl o iksLV ekLVj ,p vks ikyh ekjokM jkt- }kjk fnukad 5-12-2011 dks lsok i`Fkd fd;k tkuk mfpr

,oa oS/k ugha gSA

2-

izkFkhZ dks rqjUr lsok esa iquZLFkkfir fd;k tkosA izkFkhZ dh lsok, fujUrj ekuh tkosA

3-

izkFkhZ vf/klwfpr fookn dh frfFk fnukad 2-2-2015 ls mldks iqu% fu;qDr fd;s tkus rd 50izfr'kr iwoZHk`fr jkf'k

vizkFkhZ ls izkFkhZ dks fnykbZ tkrh gSA izkFkhZ leLr ifjykHk mldh fu;qfDr fnukad ls izkIr djus dk vf/kdkjh gSA

bl vf/kfu.kZ; dks izdk'kukFkZ Hkkjr ljdkj dks izsf"kr fd;k tkosA

;g vkns'k esjs }kjk fyfic} djok;k tkdj vkt fnukad 30-06-2017 dks [kqys U;k;ky; esa gLrk{kj dj mn~?kksf"kr

fd;k x;kA

vt; dqekj 'kekZ&1] U;k;k/kh'k

नई िदल् ली, 29 नवम् बर, 2018

का.आ. 1776.—राष् टर्पित, शर्ी मृनमोय कुमार भᲵाचाजᱮ, पीठासीन अिधकारी, केन् दर्ीय सरकार औ᳒ोिगक

अिधकरण-सह-शर्म न् यायालय, गुवाहाटी को िदनांक 22.11.2018 से छ: माह तक की अविध अथवा िनयिमत आधार पर पद

के भरे जाने तक अथवा अगले आदेश तक, जो भी पहले हो केन् दर्ीय सरकार ᬫ᳒ोिगक अिधकरण सह-शर्म-न् यायालय,

आसनसोल के पीठासीन अिधकारी के पद का अितिरक् त पर्भार सौपते हᱹ।

[सं. अ-11016/03/2015-सीएलएस-II]

अजय मिलक, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 29th November, 2018

S.O. 1776.—The President is pleased to entrust the additional charge of the post of Presiding Officer, Central

Government Industrial Tribunal-cul-Labour Court, Asansol to Shri Mrinmoy Kumar Bhattacharjee, presiding Officer,

Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Guwahati for a period of six months with effect from

22.11.2018 or till the post is filled on regular basis or until further orders, whichever is the earliest.

[No. A-11016/03/2015-CLS-II]

AJAY MALIK, Under Secy.

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6835

नई िदल् ली, 30 नवम् बर, 2018

का. आ. 1777-&औ᳒ोिगक िववाद अिधिनयम 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण मᱶ केन्दर्ीय सरकार

मेससर् एयरपोटर् अथॉिरटी ऑफ इिण्डया के पर्बंधतंतर् के संब᳍ िनयोजकᲂ और उनके कमर्कारᲂ के बीच अनुबंध मᱶ िनिद᳥

औ᳒ोिगक िववाद मᱶ केन्दर्ीय सरकार औ᳒ोिगक अिधकरण एवं शर्म न्यायालय-2, मुम्बई के पंचाट (संदभर् संख्या 3/2014) को

पर्कािशत करती है जो केन्दर्ीय सरकार को 20.11.2018 को पर्ा᳙ हुआ था।

[सं. एल&11011/55/2004-आईआर (एम)]

डी. के. िहमांशु, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 30th November, 2018

S.O. 1777.—In ursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 3/2014) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour

Court-2, Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of M/s. Airports Authority of India and their workman, which was received by the Central Government

on 20.11.2018.

[No. L-11011/55/2004-IR (M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 2, MUMBAI

PRESENT: M.V. DESHPANDE, Presiding Officer/Judge

COMPLAINT NO. CGIT-2/ 3 of 2014

Arising out of

[Reference No. CGIT-2/ 17 of 2007]

PARTIES:

1. Shri Rushikesh Chandrakant Kolambekar,

2. Shri Dayanad R. Khavale,

3. Shri Bajrang Vitthal Mane,

4. Shri Vinod Harishchandra Jadhav,

5. Shri Syryakant Giridhar Gawade,

6. Rajesh Shrirang Owale,

7. Shri Parshuram P. Yernalekar,

8. Shri Sandeep Vasant Shendge,

9. Shri Swapnil Haridas Solse,

10. Shri P. Velmurgan,

11. Shri Amol R. Tambe,

12. Shri Manoj V. Tanpure,

13. Shri Madan Krishna Vengurlekar,

14. Shri Zahir Z. Ahmed

C/o. Shri J.H. Sawant,

Advocate

Mumbai .

:

COMPLAINANTS

6836

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

V/s

Airports Authority of India,

Through

The Regional Executive Director,

Having office at New Airport Colony,

Vileparle [East],

Mumbai- 400 099.

:

OPPOSITE PARTY

APPEARANCES:

FOR THE Complainants

: Mr. J. H. Sawant, Advocate

FOR THE OPPOSITE PARTY

: No Appearance

Mumbai, dated the 22nd October, 2018

AWARD

1.

This is an application under Section 33 (A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 against the Opposite Party on

the ground that the Opposite Party has refused the work, wages and all consequential benefits to the complainants

covered and concerning the adjudicating proceedings in Reference No. CGIT-2/ 17 of 2007 w.e.f. 3.4.2007. As such the

Opposite Party has altered the conditions of services of the workmen to their prejudice during the pendency of said

adjudicating proceedings.

2.

It is the case of the Complainants that by order dt. 9.2.2007 the Central Govt. referred the industrial dispute for

adjudication to this tribunal in the following schedule.

SCHEDULE

“Whether the industrial dispute by the Airports Kamgar Union against the management of Airport Authority of

India for permanent absorption of Sh. Rushikesh C. Kolambekar and 13 other workmen [list attached] justified ?

If so, what relief the workmen are entitled to ?”

3.

The Opposite Party had contravened the provisions made u/s. 33 of I.D. Act, 1947 and has altered the conditions

of services of the complainants during the pendency of the proceedings by refusing the complaints work, wages and

consequential benefits w.e.f. 3.4.07 till date without express permission of this tribunal. The Opposite Party and its

agents employed the other persons in place of complainants to do regular nature of work of the Opposite Party that was

being attended by the complainants through agents of the Opposite Party in the premises of Opposite Party and under

direct supervision of Opposite Party who was real employer of the complainants. The complainants are in continuous

employment of the Opposite Party and therefore they have been subjected to unemployment, hardship and unjust by the

Opposite Party. They are therefore asking to declare that the Opposite Party has contravene the provisions of section 33

of the I.D. Act, 1947 by refusing work, wages and consequential benefits to the complainants / workmen w.e.f. 3.4.07

during the pendency of adjudication proceedings under Reference No. CGIT-2/ 17 of 2007 and direct the Opposite Party

to make the payment of wages to the complainants / workmen w.e.f. 3.4.07 and allow them to resume their duties.

4.

Opposite Party remained absent though duly served. No say or written statement is filed by the Opposite Party.

Complainants have filed documents and affidavit of concerned workmen. There is no cross-examination directed against

him. As such complaint proceeded ex-parte against the Opposite Party.

5.

Following points arise for my determination and my findings thereon for the reasons to follow are as under

Sr.

No.

Points

Findings

1.

Whether it is proved by the complainants that the Opposite Party has

refused the work, wages & benefits to the complainants and concerning

the adjudication proceedings in Reference No. CGIT-2/ 17 of 2007 w.e.f.

3.4.2007 without permission of the tribunal ?

Yes

2.

What order ?

As per final order

REASONS

Point No.1:

6.

The complainants have relied upon following documents in respect of their work with the Opposite Party and

dis-continuation of their services by the Opposite Party w.e.f. 3.4.07 i.e. during the pendency of adjudication proceedings

before this tribunal in Reference No. CGIT-2/ 17 of 2007. The documents are produced below Ex.6 / 1 to 30. The

document at Sr. No. 1 & 2 are payment vouchers showing that AAI made the payment to contractors for being paid to the

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6837

workers namely Mane, Kaule, Gavande & Jadhav. Letter dt. 4.9.01 produced below Ex.6 / 3 shows that daily wage

workers who have petitioned the High Court and are protected by the court are required to give necessary tokens for

allowing them daily wage workers in operational area for maintenance of the tower lighting. Documents at Sr. Nos. 5 to

9 below Ex.6 are the office notes showing the names of the employees, designation, number of days present for work,

period of leave etc. including the absentee statement. Document at Sr. Nos. 15 to 21 are the office notes and the

document at Sr. No. 22 is the copy of judgment of WP No. 21 / 2001 giving liberty to the concerned workmen to move

the conciliation machinery and directing the appropriate Govt. to consider the aspect as regards the making reference to

the tribunal and by way of interim order the workmen were protected for 3 months. At Sr. No. 44, there is order of

reference whereby the concerned workmen are asking for permanent absorption and the said reference is pending. At Sr.

No. 31 below Ex.6, there is statement of claim filed by the concerned workmen. At Sr. No. 22, there is application for

grant of interim relief and at Sr. No. 33 there is affidavit filed by the concerned workmen in respect of interim relief

application. The said reference is thus pending.

7.

The concerned workmen in his affidavit has stated that during pendency of reference the Opposite Party has

altered the conditions of services of the complainants by refusing work, wages and benefits w.e.f. 3.4.07 without

permission of the tribunal. This version of the concerned workmen has gone unchallenged as there is no cross

examination directed against him. It will have to be said that this unchallenged version of the concerned workmen has to

be accepted to come to the conclusion that Opposite Party has violated the provisions of section 33 of I.D. Act by

refusing the work, wages and benefits to the complainants and thereby altered the conditions of services of the concerned

workmen / complainants to their prejudice during the pendency of the said adjudication proceedings.

8.

Learned Counsel for the concerned workmen / complainants submitted that as per section 33, no employer shall

in regard to any matter connected with the dispute alter to the prejudice of the workmen concerned in the dispute

conditions of services applicable to them immediately before commencement of such proceedings. He also refers to

section 33 (A) to submit that where the employer contravene the provisions of section 33 during the pendency of

conciliation proceedings before Board or Arbitrator, Labour Court, Tribunal or National Tribunal, the employee

aggrieved by such contravention may make complaint in writing in the prescribed manner and the tribunal on receipt of

such complaint shall adjudicate upon the complaint as if it were dispute referred to or pending before it. He seeks to rely

on the decision in case of Automobile Products of India Ltd. & Ors. V/S. Rakmaji Bala & Ors. – AIR 1955 SC 258 to

submit that tribunal has jurisdiction to go into the minutes of the complaint and grant appropriate relief. Submission is

also to the effect that during the pendency of dispute before the tribunal service condition of the concerned workmen

cannot be altered to their prejudice without permission of the tribunal. The reliance in the context is placed on the

decision in case of Bhavnagar municipality V/S. Alibhai Karimbhai & Ors. – 1977 I LLJ 407 SC.

9.

Considering un-challenged facts, evidence and the legal position, it appears to me that the Opponents have

contravened the provisions of section 33 (1) (A) during the pendency of reference by refusing work, wages and

consequential benefits to the workmen w.e.f. 3.4.07 without permission of the tribunal. Point No. is therefore answered

accordingly.

10.

In view of that, I pass the following order:

Order

1. It is declared that Opposite Party AAI has contravened the provisions u/s. 33 of the I.D. Act by refusing

work, wages and benefits to the complainants w.e.f. 3.4.07 during the pendency of adjudication

proceedings in Reference No. CGIT-2/ 17 of 2007.

2. The Opposite Party is directed to make payment of wages & benefits to the complainants / workmen w.e.f.

3.4.2007 and allow them to resume their duties.

Date: 22.10.2018

M.V. DESHPANDE, Presiding Officer

नई िदल् ली, 30 नवम् बर, 2018

का. आ. 1778-&औ᳒ोिगक िववाद अिधिनयम 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण मᱶ केन्दर्ीय सरकार

मेससर् एयरपोटर् अथॉिरटी ऑफ इिण्डया के पर्बंधतंतर् के संब᳍ िनयोजकᲂ और उनके कमर्कारᲂ के बीच अनुबंध मᱶ िनिद᳥

औ᳒ोिगक िववाद मᱶ केन्दर्ीय सरकार औ᳒ोिगक अिधकरण एवं शर्म न्यायालय-2, मुम्बई के पंचाट (संदभर् संख्या 3/2018) को

पर्कािशत करती है जो केन्दर्ीय सरकार को 20.11.2018 को पर्ा᳙ हुआ था।

[सं. एल&11012/7/2004-आईआर (एम)]

डी. के. िहमांशु, अवर सिचव

6838

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 30th November, 2018

S.O. 1778.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 3/2018) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour

Court-2, Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of M/s. Airports Authority of India and their workman, which was received by the Central Government

on 20.11.2018.

[No. L-11012/7/2004-IR (M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.2, MUMBAI

PRESENT : M. V. Deshpande, Presiding Officer

REFERENCE NO.CGIT-2/ 03 of 2018

EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA

The Airport Director,

Airport Authority of India [IA]

Chatrapati Shivaji International Airport,

Mumbai – 400 099,

MUMBAI.

AND

THEIR WORKMEN

Shri V.B. Tiwari, Sr. Auto Mechanics [SG],

502, Rahul Apartment, Behind Mukund Nagar,

Kadamwadi, Andheri [E],

Mumbai – 400 059,

MUMBAI.

APPEARANCES:

FOR THE EMPLOYER

:

Ms. Geeta Raju Advocate

FOR THE WORKMEN

:

Mr. J. H. Sawant Advocate

Mumbai, the 17th October, 2018

AWARD PART – I

1.

This is reference made by the Central Government in exercise of powers under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and

sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 vide Government of India, Ministry of Labour &

Employment, New Delhi vide its order No. L-11012/7/2004 – IR (M) dated 11.06.2004. The terms of reference given in

the schedule are as follows :

“Whether the action of the management of Airport Director, Airports Authority of India (IAD), Mumbai in

dismissing Shri V.B. Tiwari, Sr. Auto Mechanics [SG] from services with immediate effect vide Memorandum

dated 10.12.2003, is justified, proper and in proportionate to the alleged charges of misconduct ? If not, to what

relief the workman Shri Tiwari is entitled and from which date and what other directions are necessary in the

matter ?“

2.

After the receipt of the reference, both the parties were served with the notices. They appeared through their

respective representatives.

3.

The concerned workman has filed statement of claim. According to the concerned workman, he was employed

by the management of Airport Authority of India, Mumbai w.e.f. 31.12.1975 in the capacity of Auto Electrician Gr. I. He

was further promoted to the post of Auto Mechanic in 1978, Sr. Auto Mechanic in 1990 and Auto Mechanic [SG] Sr.

grade w.e.f. 12.7.98.

4.

It is his case that the management issued show case notice dt. 27.5.96 to him alleging therein that he was

running private garage at AAI land near airport. The garage was located in Survey No. 35 of Village Marole at Marole

Technical area, Marole Pipeline. This private garage was on the land belonging to AAI, Mumbai airport and he had

unauthorisedly encroached the same. The garage was run by the concerned workman in the name of his wife and the said

act amounted to gross misconduct u/s. 5 (i)(v)(x) of IAAI Employees [Conduct, Discipline & Appeal] Regulations, 1987.

5.

According to him, he was issued charge sheet on 11.10.96. He replied the said charge sheet on 28.10.96 and

denied the charges. Management conducted departmental enquiry against him. Enquiry officer submitted his report to

the disciplinary authority. The disciplinary authority by order dt. 1.2.2000 imposed upon him the penalty of dismissal of

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6839

service of AAI with immediate effect. He preferred appeal dt. 30.6.2000 to the Appellate Authority against the dismissal

order. The Appellate Authority by its order dt. 29.3.01 set aside the dismissal order and ordered second enquiry by

issuing fresh charge sheet. However, the Appellate Authority placed him under suspension w.e.f. 1.2.2000 by way of

victimization.

6.

It is then case of the concerned workman that he was issued fresh charge sheet vide Memorandum dt. 7.1.01 on

same charges and allegations as were leveled earlier. It was alleged that he encroached the management’s land i.e.

Kondivita Village, Survey No. 104 situated at Marole Pipeline and motor garage in the name of his wife Smt. Sushila

Tiwari was in existence. He denied the charges. The disciplinary authority ordered departmental enquiry. The

departmental proceedings were conducted. E.O. submitted his report on 14.10.02. The disciplinary authority on the basis

of findings given by E.O. by his order dt. 10.12.03 imposed upon the workman the penalty of dismissal from the services

of AAI with immediate effect treating the period from 1.2.2000 to 9.12.03 as not treated as a period spent on duty. The

concerned workman preferred an appeal dt. 30.12.03 to the Appellate Authority.

7.

It is the case of the concerned workman that it was irregular and illegal on the part of management to initiate

second enquiry on same & similar charges of the first enquiry which was set aside by the Appellate Authority. It was

illegal to place him under suspension w.e.f. 1.2.2000. E.O. did not conduct disciplinary proceedings in accordance with

the principles of natural justice. E.O. did not cause production of original documents which was exhibited by the E.O. as

Ex. 2 C document dt. 12.2.03 and relied upon the same though it was not duly proved. Findings of the E.O. to the effect

that the land in question i.e. land at Survey No. 104 belongs to the management is perverse. Findings of the E.O. are

perverse since document Ex. 2 C i.e. Kami Jastic Patrak pertaining to land Survey No. 34 was a forged document and as

such the E.O. did not give any clear finding as to the ownership of land in question. The E.O. ignored to consider the

document produced by the concerned workman to establish that the land in question does not belong to management. As

such the charges as against him are not proved. Findings of the E.O. are not based on the evidence and therefore the

action of the management in dismissing him from the services w.e.f. 10.12.03 is illegal and unjustified.

8.

The workman is therefore asking for reinstatement in service w.e.f. 10.12.03 with full back wages,

consequential benefits treating the period of suspension as period on duty for all the purposes, costs & compensation.

9.

The first party management resisted claim by filing written statement. It is contended that this Industrial

Tribunal has not been sponsored by the union of the workman of the authority or by the substantial number of workmen

employed by it. As such industrial dispute does not exists in order to invoke the provisions of section 2 (k) of I.D. Act,

1947.

10.

It is then contented that the workman has raised industrial dispute over his demand for reinstatement in service

vide his letter dt. 4.2.04. The industrial dispute was raised much before expiry of period of 3 months of date of appeal

required by the Appellate Authority to pass the appropriate order. The workman thereafter during the pendency of

reference moved the Hon’ble High Court of Bombay by filing writ petition in which he had prayed for relief of

reinstatement in service with full back wages and consequential benefits etc. The Hon’ble High Court directed the

appellate authority to decide the appeal dt. 27.12.03 within one month from the date of receipt of order. In that

circumstances the order of reference dt. 11.6.04 is pre-mature as the same was obtained by him during the pendency of

appeal.

11.

According to the first party management, show cause notice was issued to the workman under the signature of

Assistant Manager with approval of Airport Director. The workman replied the said show cause notice by explanation

dt. 4.6.96. The workman was issued the charge sheet by Memorandum dt. 11.10.96 along with statement of imputation of

misconduct in support of article of charges framed against him vide Annexure – I, list of documents Annexure – II, list of

witnesses Annexure – III. He was issued memo dt. 17.10.97 fixing the preliminary enquiry on 13.11.97. The domestic

enquiry was held against him. He was given full opportunity to cross examine the witnesses examined on behalf of the

Airport authority and to meet the charges leveled against him. E.O. submitted his report to the management on 8/10-10-

99. Airport Director being the disciplinary authority by order dt. 1.2.2000 imposed upon the workman the penalty of

dismissal from services of AAI with immediate effect. The workman submitted his appeal addressed to the Chairman of

the authority against the dismissal order. The appellate authority set aside the penalty of dismissal order dt. 1.2.2000 and

ordered re-enquiry by issuing the fresh charge sheet as the appellate authority observed that proper records were not

produced during the enquiry to establish the ownership of the land. It was further observed by the appellate authority

that the workman also did not produce original relevant and proper records during the enquiry proceedings to dis-prove

the allegations though City Civil Court in order dt. 1.9.98 in Suit No. 5439 / 1987 referred the statement of his wife that

the land in question belong to authority. His suspension was therefore continued with retrospective effect from the date

of his dismissal by order dt. 1.2.2000 till the case was decided by the disciplinary authority.

12.

It is then case of the first party that 2nd charge sheet was issued by Memorandum dt. 7.8.2001 adding two

charges.

I)

committing fraud and dishonesty in connection with the property of AAI and causing damage to the

said property and

II)

refusing to surrender PIC No. N16256M in the department thereby willfully disobeying the lawful and

reasonable orders of superiors and breach of security.

The charge sheet was including the statement of imputation of misconduct, list of documents, list of witnesses.

The workman by his reply denied the charges. The departmental enquiry was held into the charges leveled

6840

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

against him by memo dt. 7.8.2001 and was concluded on 20.6.02. Mr. Y. K. Goyal, Dy. G.M. [Cargo] was

appointed as E.O. to conduct the enquiry. During the course of enquiry proceedings, originals of all the

management documents were shown to the workman for his perusal and verification. He was given opportunity

to admit or deny each article of charges of misconduct. He denied the charges leveled against him. Seven

witnesses on behalf of the management were produced at the enquiry by the Presenting Officer. After evidence

on behalf of the management both oral and documentary was over, the workman was asked to submit the list of

defence witnesses and the documents in support of the case to which he replied in the negative. But thereafter

he produced the documents in support of his defence. It is thus denied by the first party that the departmental

enquiry was conducted in violation of principles of natural justice.

13.

According to the first party management, the EO submitted enquiry report to the management on 16.10.02.

Thereafter by order dt. 10.12.03, the concerned workman was dismissed from services by Airport Director in exercise of

the powers conferred by Regulation 27 of the Regulations. Airport Director perused the enquiry proceedings recorded by

the E.O. as well as enquiry report and agreed with the conclusion arrived by E.O. The copy of enquiry report was given

to the concerned workman. It is thus denied by the first party that the findings of the E.O. are perverse and based on no

evidence. The workman thereafter filed appeal before the Appellate Authority praying to set aside & quash the dismissal

order. The appeal was not decided by the Appellate Authority since during the pendency of appeal, the concerned

workman initiated the conciliation proceedings before the conciliation officer. The conciliation officer recorded the

failure of conciliation and failure report dt. 19.4.04 was sent by him to the Ministry of Labour, Govt. of India, New Delhi

for adjudication of industrial dispute.

14.

It is thus contention of the first party that the action of the management in dismissing the concerned workman

from the services w.e.f. 10.12.03 is fair, proper, bonafide & legal and the workman is not entitled for reinstatement in

service w.e.f. 10.12.03 with full back wages, consequential reliefs etc. It has thus sought dismissal of reference.

15.

By filing rejoinder the concerned workman reiterated that the land in question belongs to Central Govt. and not

to AAI. Land Survey No. 104 has been now merged into CTS No. 272 which belongs to Central Govt. and therefore the

findings of the E.O. are totally perverse and no disciplinary action can be taken against him on the basis of perverse

findings. The Estate Officer appointed under Public Premises Act has also closed the proceedings initiated against the

wife of concerned workman in the year 1998 knowingly fully well that the land in question does not belong to AAI.

16.

Following issues are framed on 24.04.2006. Issue No.1 & 2 are treated as preliminary issues. Hence I

reproduce the Issue No.1 & 2 along with my findings thereon for the reasons to follow:

Sr. No.

Issues

Findings

1

Does the workman prove that the Enquiry Officer conducted the enquiry

proceedings in violation of the principles of natural justice ?

No

2.

Whether the workman proves that the findings of the Enquiry Officer given

in his report dated 14.10.2002 are perverse ?

No

Reasons

Issue No.1.

17.

It is well settled that if the service of the employee came to be terminated after proper domestic enquiry held in

accordance with the rules of natural justice and the conclusions reached at the enquiry are not perverse, the Industrial

Tribunal is not entitled to consider the propriety or correctness of the said conclusion. But at the same time mere form of

the enquiry would not satisfy the requirements of industrial law and would protect the disciplinary action taken by the

employer from challenge. The enquiry cannot be said to have been properly held unless,

(a)

employee proceeded against has been informed clearly of the charges leveled against him.

(b)

witnesses are examined ordinarily in presence of the employee in respect of charges.

(c)

employee is given a fair opportunity to cross examine the witnesses.

(d)

he is given fair opportunity to examine witnesses including himself in his defence.

(e)

E.O. records findings with reasons for the same in his report.

Now it is to be seen whether in the present case these requirements are complied or not ?

18.

From the evidence on record, it appears that copy of imputation of misconduct, list of documents relied upon

and the list of witnesses on the basis of which charges to be established were supplied to the concerned workman.

19.

Mr. Y. K. Goyal, Dy. G.M. [Cargo] was appointed as E.O. to conduct the enquiry. During the course of enquiry

proceedings, originals of all the management documents were shown to the workman for his perusal and verification.

Even the workman in his cross examination has admitted that his Defence Assistant demanded the inspection of original

documents and the same was given to him except document PD2C i.e. Kami Jastic Patrak. Admittedly, the workman

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6841

was given an opportunity to admit or deny each article of charges / acts of misconduct after furnishing him the facts of

the case, the charges and acts of misconduct. He participated in the enquiry. He has produced himself as a witness

before the E.O. Seven witnesses on behalf of the management were examined during the course of enquiry. After

evidence on behalf of the management workman was asked to submit the list of defence witnesses and documents in

support of his case to which he replied in negative. The workman also produced list of documents in support of his

defence. After closure of evidence both the parties submitted their briefs. The report of the E.O. was also provided to

the concerned workman on 16.12.02 and after receiving the dismissal order the workman preferred appeal on 27.12.03

which was decided by the Appellate Authority. That would show that the concerned workman was given sufficient

opportunity during the course of enquiry to defend himself.

20.

Learned Counsel for the concerned workman submitted that the enquiry was not fair & proper since it was

illegal & irregular on the part of first party to institute second enquiry on the same & similar charges which was set aside

by the Appellate Authority. As such the act on the part of disciplinary authority to issue the second charge sheet and

holding the second enquiry against the second party was illegal & irregular.

21.

In this respect, it can be said that the concerned workman has preferred appeal before the Appellate Authority

against the order of dismissal dt. 1.2.2000 based on the first enquiry and then the Appellate Authority remitted the matter

to the Airport Director ordering to hold fresh enquiry by issuing of fresh charge sheet taking into account all the relevant

documents required in the case and hence the second enquiry was conducted. Even during the course of fresh enquiry as

per the order of Appellate Authority the concerned workman was given full & fair opportunity to cross examine the

witnesses of management. So it is not the case that the concerned workman was exonerated of the charges by the

Appellate Authority. But in order to have fair & proper enquiry the Appellate Authority remitted the case to the Airport

Director ordering to hold fresh enquiry by setting aside the order of dismissal dt. 1.2.2000. It is like remanding of the

matter by the Appellate Authority for fresh enquiry. That does not mean that the Appellate Authority has exonerated the

concerned workman of the charges leveled against him. On the contrary, it appears that the concerned workman was put

under suspension during the course of fresh enquiry that was ordered by the Appellate Authority. As such the Appellate

Authority has power to direct the fresh enquiry by remitting the matter to the Disciplinary authority and therefore it was

not illegal on the part of first party to hold fresh enquiry by issuing the fresh charge sheet as per the order of Appellate

Authority.

22.

That apart even the fresh enquiry which was held as per order of Appellate Authority was not on same & similar

charges of the first party. The second charge sheet dt. 7.8.2001 Ex. M-1 & M-29 was issued with additional charges by

adding two charges namely.

I)

committing fraud and dishonesty in connection with the property of AAI and causing damage to the

said property and

II)

refusing to surrender PIC No. N16256M in the department thereby willfully disobeying the lawful and

reasonable orders of superiors and breach of security.

23.

It cannot be said therefore that fresh enquiry was held as per the order of the Appellate Authority by adding two

additional charges and therefore enquiry was not fair & proper.

24.

Next contention of the second party workman is that the enquiry was not fair & proper because of non

production of original document which was exhibited by the E.O. as Ex. 2C dt. 12.2.02 [Ex. M-10 on pg. 67) and E.O.

relied upon the said document though it was not duly proved. In this respect as said earlier the concerned workman in his

evidence has admitted that inspection of original documents was given to him except document 2 C [M-10 at pg. 67].

This document PD2C [Ex. M-10] is the Xerox copy of Kami Jastic Patrak. This is infact a public document and certified

copy of the public document can be admitted in evidence. On going through the enquiry report, it appears that the E.O.

has considered Kami Jastic Patrak which shows that the land CTS No. 272 Survey No. 104 is meant for Aerodrum. It

has been observed by him that the said document PD2C i.e. Kami Jastic Patrak has been challenged as a forged document

by the delinquent but the concerned workman that is delinquent did not produce the Kami Jastic Patrak to substantiate

this particular document as forged document. He considered that the certified copy from Notary of Hak Patra dt. 28.1.02

& dt. 14.11.96 as DD No. 14 & 15 indicate that the survey No. 104 has been acquired for the purpose of Madhya Sarkar

only. It appears therefore that EO did arrive at the finding that the land in question is belonging to AAI. It is not only on

the basis of the document 2C [M-10] i.e. Kami Jastic Patrak. The other documents are tendered by the management

before the E.O. Out of which the said document 2C is one of them. The inspection of original documents was given

admittedly to the concerned workman during the course of enquiry and this document Ex. 2C [M-10] being public

document was considered by the E.O. while arriving at finding. In the absence of evidence on behalf of the concerned

workman before the E.O., the E.O. concluded that the said document 2C cannot be considered as forged document and

placed reliance on it coupled with the other documents on record produced by the management.

25.

Even it appears that the documents produced by the concerned workman Hakka-che-patrak dt. 14.11.96 and

28.1.02 which was marked by the E.O. as Ex. DD-15 & DD-14 respectively were taken into consideration by the E.O. to

show that the land in question is belonging to the government and thereafter the E.O. considered that the land acquired by

central Govt. prior to formation of IAAI 1971 was transferred to IAAI through IAA Act 43 of 1971 and then to AAI

through AAI Act 55 of 1954. Even as per the list dt. 29.3.18, first party has produced certified copy of the Property Card

which is public document showing that the property in question is belonging to AAI. It cannot be said therefore that the

enquiry was not fair & proper since the E.O. placed reliance on Ex. M-10, the original copy of which has not been placed

on record during the course of enquiry proceedings.

6842

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

26.

In this view it is the submission of the Learned Counsel for the first party that the original document marked as

Ex. 2C by E.O. was shown to the workman and he took the inspection of same. The said document was tendered by Mr.

Arun Sharma during the course of enquiry and the same being public document, it is admissible in the evidence. The

submission holds good while considering the aspect since it has not been established during the enquiry proceedings that

the document 2C is forged document.

27.

In view of this, it can be said that the E.O. concluded after considering the evidence, oral & documentary that

the land is vested in authority by virtue of section 12 (1) (a) of the International Airport Authority Act, 1971. As such the

land Survey No.104 under CTS No. 272 belongs to AAI.

28.

Learned Counsel for the second party submits that the E.O. during the course of enquiry did not question the

second party on the circumstances if any appearing against him in evidence for the purpose of enabling him to explain

any circumstances appearing against him in the evidence as it was mandatory as per the Regulation 28 by International

Airport Authority of India Employees [Conduct, Discipline & Appeal], Regulations, 1987. Therefore the enquiry is not

fair & proper. he seeks to rely on the decision in case of Ministry of Finance V/S. S.B. Ramesh – 1988 CLR 659 to

submit that where the E.O. failed to question the charge sheeted employee under sub rule 18 of Rule 14 of CCS [CCA]

Rules, the omission to do this is a serious error committed by the enquiry authority and it vitiates the entire enquiry

proceedings.

29.

However, on going through the enquiry proceedings, it appears that the second party has filed written brief

explaining the circumstances appearing against him in the evidence. It cannot be said therefore that the opportunity was

not given by the E.O. to the concerned workman to explain the circumstances appearing against him in the evidence.

Even it cannot be said that the E.O. has not considered points raised by the second party in his written brief. What is

necessary is that the delinquent should have been given sufficient opportunity to defend himself so that no prejudice

would be caused to him. If there is no evidence to show that any such prejudice is caused to the concerned workman

while conducting the enquiry then the conclusion is that the enquiry is fair & proper and as such there is no violation of

principles of natural justice.

30.

As a matter of fact, it appears that there were eight charges leveled against the concerned workman. As per

charge No.1, the concerned workman committed encroachment on AAI land and was running garage on the said

encroached land of AAI in the name of his wife. In respect of this charge, oral evidence of Hiramath who conducted the

survey of land is considered by the E.O. along with documents namely P.R. Card PD3 of Village Kondivita bearing CTS

No. 277. Hakkache Patrak PD-2(B) in respect of survey No.104 of Village Kondivita. Kami Jastic Patrak PD2C

pertaining to CTS No. 272 corresponding Survey No. 104 and the notification document PD-4, Hakka Patra PD29 (B),

PR Card PD-3. These documents were considered by the EO to come to the conclusion that disputed land belongs to

AAI since survey No. 104 comes under CTS 272 and it belongs to Aerodrum as per KJP & PD4.

31.

In this respect submission is that there is no documentary evidence to show that there is encroachment by

running garage in the name of wife of concerned workman. The concerned workman in his evidence has no doubt

denied the allegations that he is running motor garage on said encroached land of AAI. However, on going through the

enquiry report the evidence of Kartar Singh and C.K. Nair is being considered by the E.O. to come to the conclusion that

S.T. Auto Engg. Works located within the boundary land belonging to AAI and it was confirmed by Sr. Land Manager

Shri A.K. Gupta that the concerned workman V.B. Tiwari is running the garage at survey No. 35 of Marole Technical

area. Evidence of Gupta was considered by the E.O. to come to the conclusion that he visited the area with the

supervisor and found few cars parked on the road adjacent to the garage. This was the evidence before the E.O. during

the course of enquiry to come to the conclusion that as per notification gazette published dt. 2.4.53 in Bombay Govt.

Notification dt. 28.8.47, the land was acquired for the purpose of Aerodrum and owned by AAI and that there was garage

S.T. Auto Engg. Works within the boundary of land belonging to AAI which was run by the concerned workman Shri

V.B. Tiwari.

32.

It appears on going through the enquiry report that the defence of the concerned workman was that the

document Kami Jastic Patrak is a forged document and that only on the basis of written statement of his wife, the E.O.

has considered that the land belongs to AAI but that defence was not considered since there was no evidence before the

E.O. to substantiate that the Kami Jastic Patrak was forged document. It is not even the case that only on the basis of

statement of his wife in the written statement before court it was confirmed by the E.O. that land belongs to AAI. On

going through the enquiry report, it appears that he considered oral and documentary evidence and corroborating

evidence in the form of statement of wife of concerned workman that the land belongs to AAI and even the concerned

workman during the course of enquiry has not disputed in his brief that he was running the motor garage on the

encroached land. From this, it can be seen that the findings of the E.O. as regards charge No.1 is not perverse or biased.

33.

Even then, the Learned Counsel for the concerned workman submitted that the E.O. ignored to consider the

documents produced by the second party to establish that the land in question does not belong to the first party. He

points out that the extract from the property registered card pertaining to the land at city survey No. 272 [M-11] shows

that the title of the land is in favour of the Central Govt. He then points out that the document Ex. DD13 (M-36) i.e. 7/12

extract in respect of survey No. 35 of Village Marole, Ex. DD14 [Ex.M37], Hak Patrak dt. 28.1.02 in respect of land

survey No. 104 of Kondivita Village and document Ex. DD15 [Ex.38] i.e. Hakkache Patrak dt. 14.11.96 is in respect of

land survey No. 104 and all these documents show that the land in question does not belong to first party.

34.

However, on going through the enquiry report, it appears that document i.e. Property Registered card, Hakkache

Patrak, 7/12 extract pertaining to land survey No. 35 are being considered by the EO who found that the survey No. 104

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6843

has been acquired by Madhya Sarkar. But then the document Kami Jastic Patrak in respect of CTS No. 272 survey No.

104 shows that the land survey No. 104 is meant for Aerodrum. It cannot be said therefore that the documents relied

upon by the concerned workman were not considered by the E.O. during enquiry.

35.

Charge No.2 is in respect of allegations of committing fraud & dis-honesty in connection with the property of

AAI and causing damage to the said property. As per the findings of the E.O., the land belongs to AAI and then while

considering this charge, it was considered by the E.O. that the garage was situated on the property of AAI. Evidence of

Paladia PW7 was considered which is to the effect that he himself went to the disputed land and found that the garage

was situated. He contacted wife of the concerned workman who confirmed that the garage is in her name. Even on the

basis of enquiries from the neighbours, the witness confirmed that the concerned workman was running the said garage.

It can be said therefore that the findings of the E.O. as regards charge No.2 is also based on evidence.

36.

Learned Counsel for the concerned workman submitted that the Estate Officer appointed under the Premises Act

also closed the proceedings initiated against the wife of second party in the year 1998 knowing fully well that the land in

question does not belong to AAI.

37.

However, that is not the true position. On going through the copy of order of Dy. Municipal Commissioner

Zone – III on the subject of un-authorised construction of the structure having 3 rooms and open space attached to temple

abutting the road leading to KK Road to Ashok Nagar Technical area, Opp. Mukund Nagar, Marole Pipeline. It has been

observed that the suit structure is on the land belonging to the government and in turn aviation Dept., AAI Govt.

Undertaking. As per the order suit structure mentioned in the notice stands unauthorized and plaintiff Smt. Vidyapati

Tiwari i.e. wife of the concerned workman is directed to remove the same by herself within 8 weeks from the date of

receipt of order failing which Assistant Commissioner is directed to demolish the same on the risk and cost of plaintiff.

This would show that as per the order of Municipal Commissioner unauthorized structure was erected by the wife of

concerned workman on the land belonging to AAI and it was directed to be removed by her. In view of that it can be

said the findings of the E.O. as regards the charge No.2 is not perverse.

38.

As regards the charge No.3 which is in respect of indulging in outside business activity by the concerned

workman while in service of AAI, the E.O. considered the evidence of Paladia indicating that the concerned workman

was running the garage in the name of his wife, coupled with the documents PD-10 and PD-11 showing that the

concerned workman used to sign the muster and was going to his own garage for doing the private trading. As such the

findings of the E.O. to charge No.3 is also based on evidence.

39.

As regards the charge No.4 which is in respect of hiding the information regarding possession of profession of

his wife and claiming undue monetary benefits from AAI, the EO considered the evidence of Paladia and documentary

evidence PD-10, PD-11, PD-14 indicating that the concerned workman was doing private trading and that he has availed

LTC benefits for his wife and family members though as per document PD-14 it was indicated that his wife was

dependent on him.

40.

As regards the charge No.5, that is refusing to surrender PIC No. 16256, it was considered by the E.O. that as

per additional PD No. 5 dt. 3.4.01, the concerned workman was requested to surrender PIC No. 16256 but he surrendered

PIC No. 16256 only on 13.8.01 as indicated in DD-21 after the issuance of charge sheet dt. 7.8.01. As such, this finding

of the E.O. is based on document PD-1, PD-2, additional PD-3 & additional PD-4 indicating that the concerned workman

has refused to surrender the PIC though he was asked to surrender the PIC vide these documents.

41.

Charge No.6 is in respect of acting in a manner prejudicial to interest of the authority. Charge No. 7 is in

respect of acting in a manner unbecoming an employee of the authority and committing the act subversive of discipline

and good behavior. Charge No. 8 is in respect of failure to maintain absolute integrity. The EO while considering that

the Charges No.1 to 5 are proved has considered that for proving charge No. 6, 7, 8, the same reasoning holds good.

Therefore on going through enquiry report, it appears that the findings of the E.O. are not perverse as such the findings

are based on evidence.

42.

Learned Counsel for the concerned workman seeks to rely on the decision in case of Dwarkachand V/s. State of

Rajasthan – 1958 AIR Rajasthan 38 to submit that if the departmental enquiry is resulted in exoneration, second

departmental enquiry on the same facts is not maintainable.

43.

In the present case as seen earlier, it is not the case that the Appellate Authority has exonerated the concerned

workman of the charges leveled against him. However, the Appellate Authority for giving fair opportunity has remanded

the matter for fresh enquiry. As such it is the remanding of the matter by the Appellate Authority for fresh enquiry and

therefore it is not the second enquiry on the same facts. Therefore the ratio in the above cited dictum does not help the

concerned workman. It is because it may be possible in a particular case that there has been no proper enquiry because

some serious defect has crept into the enquiry or some important witnesses were not available at the time of enquiry or

were not examined for some other reason, the disciplinary authority may ask the EO to record further evidence.

Disciplinary authority has enough power to reconsider the evidence itself and come to its own conclusion. These are the

observations which I borrow from para – 12 of the cited judgment.

44.

Learned Counsel for the concerned workman also seeks to rely on the decision in case of Satara Dist. Central

Co-op. Bank Ltd., Dist. Satara V/s. Subhash Kashinath Mule – 1991 – II CLR 405 to submit that specific provisions of

the standing order has to be informed to the delinquent who has allegedly committed misconduct. If this was not done

then it can be said that he was denied reasonable opportunity of being defended. The reliance is also place on the

6844

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

decision in case of U.P. State Road Transport Corpn. V/s. Munniruddin – 1990 – II CLR 533 to submit that non-supply

of material documents causes prejudice to the employee.

45.

Here in the instant case it is not the case of the concerned workman that he has not been supplied the material

documents. On the contrary in his cross examination, concerned workman has admitted that all the original documents

except document M-10 has been shown to him. As regards the document Kami Jastic Patrak Ex. M-10 there is specific

finding by the E.O. and the document is also referred during the course of enquiry. The certified copy of the said

document is also placed on record during the course of enquiry. It cannot be said that during the course of enquiry the

concerned workman was prejudiced because of non-supply of material documents or for any other reason. As such facts

in the instant case are quite distinct & distinguishable.

46.

Considering all these facts, I find that the E.O. conducted the enquiry proceedings in view of principles of

natural justice. As such there is no violation of principles of natural justice and the findings of the E.O. are not perverse.

I answer the above issues accordingly as indicated against each of them in terms of above observations.

47.

Hence I pass the following order.

ORDER

1.

Enquiry held is fair & proper.

2.

Findings of the Enquiry Officer are not perverse.

3.

Parties are directed to argue and lead evidence on the point of quantum of punishment.

Date: 17.10.2018

M.V. DESHPANDE, Presiding Officer

नई िदल् ली, 3 िदसम् बर, 2018

का. आ. 1779-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 (a1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

;wfu;u cSad vkQ bafM;k ds izca/kr= ds lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjks ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] Hkqous’oj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 55@2013½ dks izdkf’kr djrh gS tks

dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 3-12-2018 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y--12011@57@2013-vkbZvkj ¼ch--II½]

jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 3rd December, 2018

S.O. 1779.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 55/2013 of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Bhubaneswar as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Union Bank of

India, and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 3.12.2018

[No. L-12011/57/2013 - IR(B-II)]

RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, BHUBANESWAR

Present: Shri B.C. Rath, Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-cum-Labour

Court, Bhubaneswar.

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 55/2013

Date of Passing Award – 16th October, 2018

Between:

The Dy. General Manager,

Union Bank of India, Nodal Regional Office,

Bhubaneswar (Orissa).

…1st Party-Management

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6845

(And)

The General Secretary,

All Odisha Union Bank Employees Association,

C/o. Union Bank of India,

Bhubaneswar (Orissa)

… 2nd Party-Union

Appearances:

Shri B.B. Mohapatra, Auth. Re.

…For the 1st Party- Management

Shri Ajay Kr. Mohanty, General Secretary

… For the 2nd Party- Union

AWARD

By a letter No. L-12011/57/2013 – IR(B-II), dated 07.08.2013 the Central Government in the Ministry

of Labour & Employment, in exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of

Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (herein-after referred to as “The Act”), have referred the following

dispute for adjudication and the reference runs as follows:-

“Whether the claims of the All Odisha Union Bank Employees Association that the action of the management of

Union Bank of India claiming the violation of bipartite settlement in out-sourcing the job of Bank’s currency

chest situated at Berhampur is legal and or justified? What relief the said Union is entitled to?”

The facts relevant for adjudication of the dispute are that currency chest is part of a Bank where the jobs of cash

remittances are undertaken. When cash is accumulated in a Bank branch in excess over the permissible limit, the excess

cash is remitted to the chest. It is the claim of the 2nd party-Union in its statement of claim that such job of cash

remittance is being done by Bank’s own staff by use of Bank’s own cash delivery van driven by the Bank’s

employee/Driver. On receipt of cash at the chest, Bank’s Cashier counts the same and does all other ancillary works for

onward remittance of the cash to the Reserve Bank of India. Similarly, when a branch is in need of cash, the cash is

remitted to the branch by use of Bank’s own Van accompanied by Bank’s employees as stated above. It is the case of the

2nd party that one of such currency chests of the Management-Bank is situated at Berhampur, Odisha. The work of cash

remittance was smoothly carried out in the chest by the employees of the Management as described earlier by using

Bank’s own cash Van. All of a sudden when the cash Van was out of order and brought to Bhubaneswar for repairing,

the Management Bank had unilaterally decided to out-source the entire job of currency chest despite strong opposition to

such out-sourcing by the Union. It is the claim of the Union that as per bipartite settlements between the Management

and the Union there is no scope for the Management Bank to out-source the job of cash remittance except in the matter of

I.T. and its related activities in respect of specialized area where in-house capabilities are not available. The action of the

Management in hiring the outsource agencies for such cash remittance is an unfair labour practice as much as such action

affects and brings change in service condition as enumerated in Schedule-IV of the Act. By introducing the method of

outsourcing in the job of cash remittance an environment is being created for retrenchment of employees engaged in the

said sector as well as the same will affect the promotion prospective of the employees. The said action of the

Management is a clear case of violation of bipartite settlements between the parties. According to the 2nd party a protest

was raised before the Management when such method of out-sourcing was adopted in the work of cash remittance. As

the Management did not pay any heed to the demand of the Union for discarding the service of out-sourcing agency in

the matter of cash remittance, a dispute was raised before the labour machinery. The conciliation attempt having been

failed the reference as mentioned earlier is made to this Tribunal for an adjudication of the dispute.

In its written statement the Management-Bank has resisted the claim of the 2nd party taking a stand that the

reference is not maintainable as there was/is no existing of apprehended industrial dispute between the parties in the

event of out-sourcing the job of cash remittance. It is within the managerial discretion of an employer to organize and

arrange his business in the manner he considers best. The engagement of out-sourcing agency in the work of cash

remittance in a contingency cannot be treated or termed as an “Industrial dispute” as defined in Section 2(k) of the Act.

As such, the reference is bad in law. That apart, it is the stand of the Management that no retrenchment/termination is

effected or promotions of the employees are suspended or withheld by engagement of an out-sourcing agency in the job

of cash remittance. There is also no specific terms and conditions in the various bi-partite settlements prohibiting the

Management to take assistance of out-source in such cash remittance more particularly in urgent contingencies. On the

other hand as per the guidelines issued from time to time by the Reserve Bank the Banks are to take its own decision and

view on the desirability of out-sourcing in activity related to financial services for public interest and keeping in view all

relevant factors including the commercial aspects of the decision. The decision to out-source the financial services

activity is taken keeping in view the risk and for necessary safeguards of cash remittance. There is a need of large

network to handle the currency chest and work of cash remittance to meet the cash requirements and cash remittance of

various branches of the Management-Bank and its extension counters. The existing staff and infrastructure is not found

adequate to meet such need. As such, the action of the Management cannot be held unfair or the same amounts to a

change to service condition of its employees as defined and contemplated in the Act. The alleged action being managerial

discretion of the Bank for its smooth functioning cannot be said illegal and unjustified and as such the dispute raised by

the Union should be rejected out-rightly.

On the afore-mentioned pleadings of the parties the following issues have been settled for an effective

adjudication of the dispute.

6846

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ISSUES

1. Whether the reference is maintainable?

2. Whether the claim of the All Odisha Union Bank Employees Association that the action of the management of

Union Bank of India claiming the violation of bipartite settlement in out-sourcing the job of Bank’s currency

chest situated at Berhampur is legal and justified?

3. What relief the said Union is entitled to?

The 2nd party-Union has examined one of its office bearer and filed copy of the minutes of the I.R. Meeting held

on 20.3.2012, copy of the bi-partite settlement dated 2.6.2005, copy of bipartite settlement dated 27.4.2010, copy of

bipartite settlement dated 25.5.2015, copy of the letter of the Union dated 29.6.2012 addressed to the Management, copy

of the letter dated 3.2.2014 issued by the A.G.M. Security, Mumbai to National Dy. Chairman, National Ex-Serviceman

Co-ordination Committee, Calicut and copy of advertisement for recruitment of Armed Security Guard in RBI, which are

marked as Ext.-1 to Ext.-7 to substantiate its stand, whereas the Management has also adduced oral as well as

documentary evidence marked Ext.-A and Ext.-B to refute the claim of the Union.

FINDINGS

All the issues are taken into consideration simultaneously for the sake of convenience and since they are inter-

linked to each other.

It is apparent from the pleadings and evidence of the 2nd party-Union that the action of the Management in out-

sourcing the job of Bank’s currency chest is opposed mainly on the allegation that the action violates the settlement

reached out between the parties in the bipartite settlement of the year, 2005 as well as subsequent bi-partite settlements

between the parties. According to the Union the Management is precluded by virtue of the bipartite settlement, 2005 to

engage any out-sourcing agency in the matter/job of the cash remittance to bank’s currency chest or vice-versa since

Clause 31-H of the said bipartite settlement (Ext.-2) mandates that the Bank can only out-sourced IT and its related

activities and no other area. Be that as it may, the decision of the Management in out-sourcing the work/job of currency

remittance to the currency chest or vice versa is illegal and such action of the Management being an unfair labour

practice as defined under section 9-A cannot be protected and legalized. As per the Management’s pleading and

argument the Management has discretion to run its day to day administration by adopting policies beneficial to the

Management. The Management having competency to take decision in the policy matter/day to day administration is not

necessarily to do a particular job or to get a work done in a particular manner as desired by the 2nd party-Union or its

employees. Any decision taken for betterment of the administration or for public cause cannot be termed as industrial

dispute as defined in the Act. As such the reference is not maintainable.

Taking into consideration the rival stands it is to be seen first whether the demand raised by the 2nd party is an

“industrial dispute” required to be adjudicated under section 10-A of the I.D. Act. The grievance of the 2nd party-Union is

that the action of the Management in out-sourcing the job of Bank’s currency is not only prohibited by the bipartite

settlements, but the same likely bringing changes to the service condition of the employees of the Bank is an unfair

labour practice. The decision in the matter affects the terms and conditions of employment and any change in such

service condition requires a notice as prescribed under section 9-A of the Act. It is not in dispute that the job of Bank’s

currency chest prior to the alleged out-sourcing was done by the employees of the Management-Bank. There is also no

serious dispute that the Bank has its own vehicle and driver for the said job. It is also emerging from the evidence of the

parties that the Management-Bank has sanctioned posts of armed guards for the purpose. Though, there is no specific

pleadings or evidence to the fact that out-sourcing the job of Bank currency chest would likely cause retrenchment of

armed guards or any other employees engaged in such job, it cannot be denied that any decision in the matter of out-

sourcing or engaging its own employees in the said job is a matter related to the terms of employment as well as

determination of contract of employment. As such any dispute in regard to the determination of contract or the

employment or terms of employment is an “industrial dispute” as defined under section 2(k) of the Act. Hence, the

argument advanced by the Management that the action taken by the Management and objection thereto is not an

“industrial dispute” has no force to stand. In the Banking system the work of currency chest is very vital and essential

part of the business of the Management. Any policy decision for smooth functioning of the currency chest will

undoubtedly affect the terms of service condition of the workman engaged for the said job. That being the situation the

2nd party-Union has every right to raise an industrial Dispute before the competent authority for the action of the

Management in out-sourcing the work of currency chest. In that view of the matter such dispute having been not

conciliated can be referred to for an adjudication in exercise of the powers conferred under section 10-A of the Act.

Hence, the claim of the Management that the reference is bad in law is not sustainable.

Coming to the issue whether the action of the Management-Bank in outsourcing the job of Bank’s currency

chest at Berhampur is a violation of the bi-partite settlement, 2005 (marked as Ext.-2) it is seen that the Management has

taken a stand that neither the said settlement under Ext.-2 nor the bipartite settlements prior to or subsequent to Ext.-2 has

any specific restriction for out-sourcing the job of currency chest. Besides, it has been claimed that the Bank has every

right to reorganize its business or to close or out-source a particular work or section in order to rationalize or economize

its business. There being no report of any retrenchment or surplus employees due to such out-sourcing of Bank’s

currency chest work the action of the Management cannot be counted as an unfair labour practice or such action has

violated any terms conditions of service. On the other hand, it has been argued on behalf of the 2nd party-Union that out-

sourcing being restricted in the day to day business of the Management-Bank in view of different sub-clauses enumerated

in clause – 31 of the bi-partite settlement, 2005 the action of the Management in out-sourcing Bank’s currency chest job

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6847

is totally illegal and unjustified. Admittedly on a mere reading of the various sub-clauses of clause – 31 including clause

31-H, it is emerged that the Bank may out-source IT related activities and in respect of its specialized area only where in-

house capability is not available. It is not in dispute that the bipartite settlement of 2005 and other settlements do not

specify that the Management-Bank is strictly prohibited in out-sourcing other jobs than the IT activity. Moreover, the

close reading of various sub-clauses of 31 leads to an inference that the Bank has authority or discretion to redesign,

review the existing jobs or work process or to adopt the new systems and procedures, if it is believed in bonafide that the

reorganization is necessary or the system can be rationalized and economized its business or economize its expenditure.

At the same time the sub-clauses lead to an inference that the Management is to endeavor to retain/re-skill the staff in

order to develop the in-house competencies while it may out-source IT and its related activities where in-house

capabilities are not available. In view of such specific wording and sentences in Clause 32, doubt can also be entertained

on the discretion of the Management to out-source all nature of jobs in the Bank other than the activity of IT sector.

Further, it cannot be over-sighted as well as it is emerged from the evidence of the parties that the Bank was having its

own staff for the job of currency chest. It was having its own cash delivery van and Driver and Security guards for the

job of cash remittance in the currency chest. By introducing out-sourcing in the said job it can be presumed that

employee engaged in such currency activity is likely to be declared surplus and occasion may arise for dislodging of the

employees found surplus in the said activity. Hence, the out-sourcing would bring a change in service condition of

certain section of the employees of the Bank. As per the provisions of Section 9-A the employer is prohibited to bring

changes in service condition unless it is notified earlier otherwise the action would be an unfair labour practice. It is in

evidence that no prior notice was given to the employees before adopting the system of out-sourcing in the currency

chest. Though the Management has managerial discretion to organize/reorganize and arrange/rearrange its business in the

manner he considers best so long it is bonafide. The Management has to take such action in organize/reorganize in

accordance to the provisions required by any law/special statute. Since certain restrictions seems to have been made on

the Management to borrow out-sourcing in other official business/job except in the matter of IT activities, the Bank was

required to issue notice to the employees of the Bank. Hence, such action of the Management can be termed as illegal

and unjustified solely on account of the same being not notified to the employees.

But, in the case at hand it cannot be over-looked that the Management took the assistance of the out-sourced

when its delivery van became out of order. It is in evidence that the vehicle is yet to be repaired. The remittance in

currency chest is an important part of Bank’s business or job and it needs to be attended urgently. There is no evidence

on behalf of the Union to show that the action of out-sourcing is adopted for all time. There is also no evidence to suggest

that the action of out-sourcing has dislodged or disengaged any employee of the Bank or the same action is likely make

some employees surplus or may affect their service condition. In absence of any specific evidence in the above regard the

action of the Management due to certain contingencies cannot also be declared unfair on the ground of the same not

being notified to the employees as required by the provisions of Section 9-A of the Act. The Management has taken a

specific stand that it has out-sourced the currency chest job on account of cash delivery van being out of order. No

evidence has been adduced by the 2nd party-Union to refute the said evidence. It is also well settled that it is within the

managerial discretion of an employer to organize and arrange his business in the manner he considers best and such

action is taken in bonafide, the Tribunal has no competency to question such action of the Bank (PAL & Others reported

in air 1970 SC 1334). Hence, the action of the Management in out-sourcing the job of currency chest in urgency seems to

be bonafide.

For the reasons and discussions made above in my considered view the claim of the 2nd party-Union to declare

the action of the Management-Bank in out-sourcing the job of Bank currency chest as illegal and unjustified has no leg to

stand or no legal sanctity. Besides, the dispute raised in this regard does not seem to be an industrial dispute in true sense

of labour laws as there is no evidence to the effect that the Management has adopted the system of outsourcing as a

permanent phenomena. Therefore, no relief can be given to the 2nd party-Union in the present contingency.

Reference is answered accordingly.

Dictated & Corrected by me.

B. C. RATH, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 3 fnlEcj] 2018

dk- vk- 1780-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eqEcbZ iksVZ

VªLV ds izca/kr= ds lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjks ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- 2] eqEcbZ ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 14@2017½ dks izdkf’kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 03-12-2018

dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&31012@01@2017&vkbZ vkj ¼ch&II)]

jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

6848

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, 3rd December, 2018

S.O. 1780.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 14/2017) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No

2, Mumbai as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Mumbai Port Trust, and their

workmen, received by the Central Government on 03.12.2018

[No. L-31012/01/2017-IR(B-II)]

RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.2, MUMBAI

PRESENT :M. V. Deshpande, Presiding Officer

REFERENCE NO.CGIT-2/14 of 2017

EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF MUMBAI PORT TRUST

The Chairman,

Mumbai Port Trust,

Port House, Shoorji Vallabhdas Marg,

Mumbai – 400 001.

AND

THEIR WORKMEN

Shri Karbhari Keru Bhangare,

A/108, Tulsivilla Building, Manda,

Titwala (W), Distt. Thane,

Thane –

APPEARANCES:

FOR THE EMPLOYER

:

Mr. Umesh Nabar Advocate

FOR THE WORKMEN

:

Absent

Mumbai, dated the 24th October, 2018

AWARD

1.

This is reference made by the Central Government in exercise of powers under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and

sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 vide Government of India, Ministry of Labour &

Employment, New Delhi vide its order No. L-31012/01/2017 – IR (B-II) dated 26.04.2017. The terms of reference given

in the schedule are as follows :

“Whether the action of the management of Mumbai Port Trust in terminating the services of Shri Karbhari Keru

Bhangare, Typist-cum-Computer Clerk w.e.f. 06.07.2012 under the pretext of long period of unauthorized

absenteeism is just & legal ? If not, what relief the workman concerned is entitled to ?“

2.

After the receipt of the reference, both the parties were served with the notices.

3.

On going through Roznama it appears that the concerned workman is absent since beginning i.e. from 4.7.17.

Statement of claim has not been filed so far want of evidence to substantiate the claim. Reference is liable to be rejected

and accordingly it is rejected.

ORDER

Reference is rejected with no order as to costs.

Date: 24.10.2018

M.V. DESHPANDE, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 3 fnlEcj] 2018

dk- vk- 1781-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eqEcbZ iksVZ

VªLV ds izca/kr= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjks ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd

vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- 2] eqEcbZ ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 96@2014½ dks izdkf’kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 03-12-2018

dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&31011@01@2014&vkbZvkj ¼ch-&II)]

jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6849

New Delhi, the 3rd December, 2018

S.O. 1781.— In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 96/2014) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No

2, Mumbai as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Mumbai Port Trust, and their

workmen, received by the Central Government on 03.12.2018.

[No. L-31011/01/2014-IR(B-II)]

RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 2, MUMBAI

PRESENT : M. V. Deshpande, Presiding Officer

REFERENCE NO.CGIT-2/ 96 of 2014

EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF MUMBAI PORT TRUST

The Chairman,

Mumbai Port Trust,

Port House, 2nd Floor, S.V. Marg,

Ballard Estate,

Mumbai – 400 001.

AND

THEIR WORKMEN

The President,

The Bombay Transport & Dock Workers’ Union,

Shroff Mansion, 157-B, R. No. 25, 4th Floor,

P. D’Mello Road, Carnac Bunder,

Mumbai.

APPEARANCES:

FOR THE EMPLOYER

:

Mr. Umesh Nabar Advocate

FOR THE WORKMEN

:

Mr. P. K. Sharma Representative

Mumbai, dated the 8th October, 2018

AWARD

1.

This is reference made by the Central Government in exercise of powers under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and

sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 vide Government of India, Ministry of Labour&

Employment, New Delhi vide its order No. L-31011/01/2014 – IR (B-II) dated 10.10.2014. The terms of reference given

in the schedule are as follows :

“Whether the action of the management of Mumbai Port Trust in denying the designation of “Ship Crane

Operators’ in Class-III to the Winch Drivers, presently categorized in Class-IV, for their operating heavy duty

hydraulic and electric cranes with the lifting capacity in the range of 50-100 tones to 200-500 tones, and for

proper pay fixation with retrospective effect at-least on par with Crane Operators of Mumbai Port Trust and

payment of arrears, is justifies and legal / what relief the workmen are entitled to ?“

2.

After the receipt of the reference, both the parties were served with the notices. They appeared through their

respective representatives.

3.

The concerned workman has filed statement of claim Ex.7 contending therein that the concerned workmen were

recruited as senior workers by Ex. BDLB. They were promoted as Winch Driver after conducting proper training and

interview. However, at the time of promotion as Winch Drivers they were not extended equal pay scale as other Winch

Drivers. They were arbitrarily continued to retain on the same scale of senior workers and payment of first ACP was also

retained by the first party even though they are entitled to equal pay and all other benefits as is being paid to Winch

Drivers of first party.

4.

It is also the case of the concerned workmen that in 1991 – 1992 due to advent of mechanism and technological

upgradation, all winches unable to lift more than 10 tone weight were replaced by heavy lift jumbo derricks, gantry,

jeminee, heavy and higher lifting capacity hydraulic & electric Ship’s crane whose minimum lifting capacity is in range

of 50 – 100 tones to 200 – 800 tones. The parcel packaging of the steel coils were also increased from 5 – 10 tones to

minimum start of 20 tones. All these upgradations caused the cranes to be very fast moving and hence became very risky

and posed a great risk to the operators while performing operations.

6850

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

5.

According to the concerned workmen the first party forced to workmen to operate the same from the date of

upgradation of technology without giving them proper benefits and equal pay scale grade and other benefits. The

concerned workmen addressed letters raising their protest and requested the first party to resolve their grievances. The

second party union on behalf of the workmen raised the demand on the management of first party by their letter dt.

28.11.13. The first party got the matter seized under conciliation before ALC on 5.12.13. However, on 5.2.14

Conciliation Officer advised the management of first party to hold bilateral talks with the second party union. However,

the first party failed to extend the proper benefits and acted in a wholly arbitrary and illegally manner. Conciliation thus

failed. Hence this reference.

6.

It is then contention of the second party union that the action of the management of MbPT in failing to designate

the concerned workmen as Ship Crane Operator and giving them proper grade from Class IV to Class III from the day of

their operating heavy lift jumbo derricks, gantry, jeminee, heavy and higher lifting capacity hydraulic & electric Ship’s

crane whose minimum lifting capacity is in range of 50 – 100 tones to 200 – 800 tones be declared illegal and the

management be directed to designate the concerned workmen as Ship Crane Operators and give them grade from Class

IV to Class III with immediate effect and then direct the management to fix them under the proper pay scale of lower

Crane Operator of MbPT who are operating maximum 16 – 20 tones crane and then direct the management to pay unpaid

arrears of difference of wages and other benefits of that scale from the date of their promotion as Winch Driver till actual

fixation and payment of proper pay scale.

7.

The first party management resisted claim by filing written statement Ex.9. It is contended that the 2nd party

union is seeking financial upgradation of the concerned employees by creating right in favour of employees by

promoting them from Class IV to Class III under the guise of claiming their upgradation to the higher post on the ground

that they are performing the similar and same duties of employees employed in Class III. However, their pleadings and

order of reference would reveal that it is not the case of union that the employees concerned are deprived of any right to

the upgradation from Class IV to Class III.

8.

It is then contented by the first party that the nature of duties of Winch Drivers employed in Class IV and of

Shower Crane Operators are different. Both the posts are in different streams and in different categories. The operations

of Wharf Crane requires higher degree of skill compared to Winch crane since Wharf Cranes are shore post and move on

the rails. If safety methods are not followed and if there is carelessness on the part of operator of wharf crane, it may

lead to toppling the crane. This is not the case as regards Winch cranes as they are relatively more stable being the

integral part of huge mass of ship. While lifting the cargo from the hatch of the ship by winch crane, there is relative

movement of winch crane and the ship. This is not the case when cargo is handled by wharf crane as there is no relative

movement between wharf crane and ship on account of which more precision and skill is required while operating the

wharf crane for loading the cargo from wharf into the ship and unloading it from the ship to wharf. The operation of the

wharf cranes demands that all the 3 operations namely hoisting / lowering of hook, luffing and slewing to be done in

synchronized manner which is not in case of winch cranes. Winch drivers are supposed to operate ship winch / jumbo

derricks, jeminee which are types of ship winch prepared to handle heavy lift cargo. Due to change in configuration of

ships now a days most of the ships are equipped with ship crane. Winch drivers are operating ship winch crane and such

lifting devices i.e. ship crane, jumbo derrick, jeminee, gantry etc. are fixed on the board vessel.

9.

It is contented by the first party that the issues as regards designation & upgradation of pay scales of category of

winch drivers on board level was thoroughly examined by one man committee for classification and categorization of

employees and workers of major port trust and Dock labour board appointed by Indian Ports Association. The said

committee after taking into consideration all the factors gave recommendation at paragraph 20.25 on the issue of winch

drivers. Now it is decided to refer the issue for arbitration and therefore the issue is pending before arbitration.

10.

It is also contented by the first party management that the advent of mechanism has reduced the human skill

element and operations can be carried out more precisely and safely due to technical upgradation on the ship cranes.

Many ships come to the port with cranes of capacity less than 50 tones which are operated by winch drivers. There are

many cargo including bagged cargo which are now handled in port of having weight less than 5 tones and therefore the

benefits sought by the 2nd party union if granted would amount to showing favour to one set of employee without giving

opportunity of being heard in the matter of other set of employees whose services would be adversely affected. It is thus

denied by the first party that the winch drivers are operating under fear and pressure and that they are subjected to

various harassment tactics. It is thus contended that the second party union is not entitled to any relief. The first party

has thus sough dismissal of the reference.

11.

The second party union by filing rejoinder Ex.13 reiterated that the cargo is admittedly either loaded or

unloaded by the winch drivers are the ship crane operators. Winch drivers do loading & unloading and cranes which are

among land static and stationery are do not move. Ship on the other hand is never stationery and always moves

depending on waves and ripples on the water and loading & unloading from the same is more difficult and possess more

danger to the workers operating as ship crane operators.

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6851

12.

Following issues are framed at Ex.18. I reproduce the issues along with my findings thereon for the reasons to

follow:

Sr. No.

Issues

Findings

1

Whether the 2nd party proves that the Winch Drivers are working as Ship

Crane Operator since 1991 - 1992 ?

No

2.

Whether the 2nd party proves that the Winch Drivers operate cranes of higher

capacity than the Shore Crane Operators of Mb.P.T. ?

No

3.

Whether the 2nd party/Union proves that the nature of duties of Winch

Drivers in class-IV categories are same on that of Crane Operators in Class

III categories are same to claim same pay-scale with retrospective effect ?

No

4.

Whether the 2nd party proves that the Winch Drivers are entitled to higher

pay scale, grade and designation higher than or at-least on par with Shore

Crane Operators with retrospective effect from 1991 – 1992 ?

No

5.

Whether the action of First Party denying the same pay-scale to Winch

Drivers in Class-IV category as that of Crane Operators in Cass-III category

is legal, fair and proper ?

Yes

6.

What order ?

As per final order

Reasons

Issue No. 1, 2 & 3.

13.

The main issue raised by 2nd party union in the above reference is that the nature of duties of Winch drivers

employed in class –IV and Shore Crane Operators are the same and that they should be paid scales and proper pay

fixation with retrospective effect and be designated as Ship Crane operators. However, the 2nd party union in its

statement of claim has not specifically stated about the nature of duties of Winch drivers vis-à-vis the nature of duties of

Shore Crane Operators.

14.

So far evidence of the President of the union is concerned vide Ex.23, he appears to have stated that the

concerned workmen were designated as senior workers and thereafter they were promoted as Winch drivers after

conducting training & interview. What is stated by him is that the workers who were recruited and promoted as Winch

drivers since 1991 – 1992 were denied equal pay scale as applicable to the category of Winch drivers. In short it is the

case of the concerned workmen that the work of Winch drivers in class –IV and Shore Crane Operators in class – III is

same meaning thereby they are claiming promotion as Shore Crane Operator.

15.

For, it is explicit from the evidence of the President of the union that the concerned workmen are claiming the

pay scale on par with Ship Crane Operators who are in class – III claiming thereby that winch drivers are doing the work

as Ship Crane Operators and that they are not of different categories.

16.

However, in his cross examination, he admitted that the weight of the cargo is increased by technical

advancement of the machinery. Admittedly winches are converted by technical upgradation. It is admitted that same

winch drivers operate advanced machinery which is replaced by earlier winches. If that is so, then it can be said that by

technical advancement of the machinery, risk to the operation is reduced while performing operations.

17.

From the evidence of Ainul Haque S/o. Salim Khan, Mohd. Anwar & Naresh Lavande, it is clear that they are

claiming promotion as Shore Crane Operator. In their cross-examination, they have admitted that they have not operated

as Shore Crane Operators. They are working as Winch drivers. Winch driver is in Class – IV categories, Shore Crane

Operator is in Class – III category. So the categories are different. Admittedly they are operating in category from Shore

Crane Operator. It appears therefore that the concerned workers are claiming promotion as Shore Crane Operator only

on the basis that the work of Winch driver is at par with Shore Crane Operator.

18.

In this respect if we see the evidence of first party witness, Shri Shashi Kumar Nikam, Asst. Administrative

Officer, it is clear from his evidence that the operations of ship crane requires higher degree of skill compared to winch

crane, for the following reasons.

(i)

Wharf Cranes (Ship Cranes) are shore based and move on the rails. If safety methods are not followed

and if there is carelessness on the part of the operator of a Wharf Crane it may lead to the toppling of

the Crane. This is not the case as regards Winch Cranes, as they relatively more stable being an

integral part of the huge mass of the Ship.

(ii)

While lifting the cargo from the hatch of the Ship by a Winch Crane, there is relative movement of

Winch Crane and the Ship. However, this not the case when Cargo is handled by the Wharf Crane, as

there is no relative movement between the Wharf Crane and the Ship on account of which more

6852

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

precision and skill is required when operating the Wharf Crane for loading the Cargo from the Wharf

into the Ship and unloading it from the Ship to the Wharf.

(iii)

Operation of Wharf Cranes demands that all the three operations viz. hoisting/lowering of hook, luffing

and slewing to be done in synchronized manner which is not the case in respect of Wharf Cranes.

19.

Apart from this, winch drivers are supposed to operate ship winch, jumbo, derricks, jeminee which are types of

ship winches prepared to handle heavy lift cargo. Winch drivers are operating ship, winch & lifting devices such as ship

crane, jumbo, derricks, jeminee, gantry etc. which are fixed on board of vessel. So considering the nature of work of the

winch drivers and ship crane drivers, it can be said that their duties are different, they are working in different categories.

As such there is no evidence to prove that the nature of work of Ship Crane Operators/Winch drivers and Shore Crane

Operators is same. At the most it can be said that the nature of work of both the categories of cranes are same.

20.

That part, if the demand of the concerned workmen is being taking into consideration, then it is submitted that it

is the prerogative of Indian Ports Association to deal with these issues of all the ports in the country in respect of fixing,

classification including wage scales and other service conditions. It is explicit from the document at Ex.43 which says

about the prerogative of Indian Ports Association. Latter at page 9 & 10 on Ex. 43 establishes that such resolution of the

issue has to be with concurrence the Federation of the employees of all ports. In any case that issue is to be resolved by

approval of Indian Ports Association.

21.

Even then the Learned Counsel for the union submitted that work done by the concerned workers and crane

operators is similar. Submission is to the effect that Shore Crane Operators working in the Wharf were not Shore Crane

Operators and Shore Crane Operators never runs on tracks during actual operations. By referring to the evidence of

Mr. Nikam, submission is made that the winch drivers were high skilled and performing the work of loading from wheels

to wharf and from wharf to wheels and could do the work of Wharf Crane Operators. In this view the submission is that

the work of concerned workers involved more skill and called for greater precision and accuracy apart from more

dangerous and therefore it is necessary to extend them benefits of equal pay for equal wages.

22.

It is not possible to countenance the view propounded by Learned Counsel for the concerned workmen. As

seen earlier, it is the prerogative of Indian Ports Association to deal with such issues of all the ports in the country.

Merely saying that the work of the concerned workmen is risky and hazardous does not give right to them to claim

promotion and financial upgradation without establishing any right vested in them under the existing system. In view of

this the submission is also to the effect that the second party union raised issues of re-designation and upgradation of pay

scales of category of winch drivers of on board labour. It was thoroughly examined by one man committee for

classification and categorization of employees and workers of major port trust and Dock labour board by Afzalpurkar

committee appointed by Indian Ports Association. The said committee after taking into consideration all the factors gave

recommendations at paragraph 20.25 on the issue of winch drivers. 5 Federations of employees have already raised the

issue of implementation of Afzalpurkar committee report with CLC in which at paragraph 20.25 of the said report the

issue of winch drivers is covered and it is decided to refer the issue for arbitration. When the issue is pending before

arbitration, the issue of winch drivers at MbPT in isolation cannot be considered.

23.

Considering all these facts, I find that the second party union has failed to establish that the nature of duties of

winch drivers of class – IV categories are same on that of crane operators in class –III categories and as such they are

operating cranes of higher capacity than the Shore Crane Operators of MbPT. The witnesses examine on behalf of the

unit admit in their cross examination that they never worked as Shore Crane Operators but then they are claiming

promotion as Shore Crane Operators in class – III categories from class – IV categories. Obviously they are not entitled

to claim designation and pay scale at par with Shore Crane Operators. The above issues are therefore answered

accordingly as indicated against each of them in terms of above observations.

Issue No.4, 5 & 6.

24.

In view of my findings to the above issues, I find that the concerned workmen are not entitled to higher pay

scales, grade, re-designation with retrospective effect from 1991 – 1992 and as such the action of the first party in

denying the same to them is legal & proper.

25.

Hence I proceed to pass the following order.

ORDER

Reference is rejected with no order as to costs.

Date: 08.10.2018

M.V. DESHPANDE, Presiding Officer

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6853

ubZ fnYyh] 3 fnlEcj] 2018

dk- vk- 1782-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

bafM;u cSad ds izca/kr= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] Hkqous’oj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 81@2012½ dks izdkf’kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

03-12-2018 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&12011@1@2012&vkbZvkj ¼ch&II)]

jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 3rd December, 2018

S.O. 1782.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 81/2012) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Bhubaneswar as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Indian Bank, and

their workmen, received by the Central Government on 03.12.2018.

[No. L-12011/1/2012-IR(B-II)]

RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT BHUBANESWAR

Present: Shri B.C. Rath, Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-cum-Labour

Court, Bhubaneswar.

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 81/2012

Date of Passing Award – 24th October, 2018

Between:

The Zonal Manager,

Indian Bank, B-2 East, Sahidnagar,

Bhubaneswar (Orissa) – 751 007.

…1st Party-Management

(And)

The General Secretary,

Indian Bank Employees Union,

Plot No. 32, Ashok Nagar,

Bhubaneswar (Orissa) – 751 009.

…2nd Party-Union

Appearances:

Ms. Subhadra Sahoo, Asst. Manager

…

For the 1st Party- Management

Shri Ashok Kumar Mohanty, General Secretary

…

For the 2nd Party-Union.

AWARD

The Government of India in the Ministry of Labour vide its letter No. L-12011/1/2012 (IR(B-II),

dated 30.08.2012 have referred the following dispute for adjudication in exercise of its power conferred by clause (d) of

sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act (herein-after referred to as “The Act”)

“Whether the action of the management of Indian Bank, Zonal Office, Bhubaneswar in not considering the case

of regularization of 8 numbers of canteen employees (S/Shri Akhya Sahu, Dibakar Padhi, Dilip Kumar Patra,

Parikhit Nanda, Gauranga Chandra Nath, Prabhat Kumar Barik, Bijoy Kumar Dash and Niranjan Behera) who

are engaged by the Bank through Indian Bank Staff Canteen committee for decades together in Bhubaneswar, is

appropriate and justified? What relief the concerned workmen are entitled to?”

2.

The 2nd party-Union filed its statement of claim taking a stand that the eight canteen boys have been working in

the canteens in the different branches of the Management-Bank for more than fifteen years continuously, when the

reference was made. Their nature of job was perennial since the canteen is a part and parcel of the Bank. The branches of

the Bank, where the canteen boys were working, were previously under the supervision of Calcutta zone. After opening

of a zonal office of the Management-Bank the branches at Odisha have come under the control of the zonal office at

Bhubaneswar. According to the Union a dispute was raised for regularization of services of the canteen boys working in

different branches while the zonal office was at Calcutta. Consequently, a dispute relating to regularization of 41 canteen

boys was referred to the Central Government Industrial Tribunal, Calcutta. While the said dispute was pending for

adjudication before the Tribunal of Calcutta, a bipartite settlement was made between the parties for regularization of

91 canteen boys working in different branches of the Bank. The names of the canteen boys in the present dispute were

also included in that settlement. Pursuant to such settlement the Tribunal of Calcutta passed an award directing

regularization of services of all 91 canteen boys. But, the Management preferred a writ before the Hon’ble High Court of

Calcutta challenging the award. Since the original reference was related to 41 canteen boys working in different

6854

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

branches of the Bank at Calcutta, the Hon’ble High Court set aside the award given in favour of 91 canteen boys and

modified the same by holding as follows:-

“With regard to 91 canteen boys, we are of the view that the Tribunal lacked inherent jurisdiction to consider all

those 91 persons since the reference was related to 41 persons only and not 91 persons named in the list attached to the

award. The award, therefore, would be applicable in case of original 41 persons whose names are appearing in the order

of reference. For the other 50 persons the Union would be entitled to raise similar dispute and such issue can be resolved

through reconciliation on the same terms and conditions so that those 50 persons could also be brought within the

hotchpots of this settlement to avoid further complication.

The Management preferred a S.L.P. against the order of the Hon’ble High Court. But, the same was dismissed. It is the

stand of the 2nd party-Union that a fresh dispute was raised before the labour machinery at Bhubaneswar for

regularization of eight canteen boys keeping in view the observations made by the Hon’ble High Court of Calcutta. In

view of regularization of service of 41 canteen boys employed in the canteens of the branches of the Bank at Calcutta the

Management-Bank is also required to be regularized the services of the eight canteen boys engaged in different branches

of the Bank at Odisha.

3.

On the other hand, the Management-Bank has resisted the claim of the Union on a pleading that no canteen has

been established or run by the Bank in any of the branches of Odisha. Hence, there was no scope for employing or

engaging the disputant canteen boys by the Management. Therefore there being no relationship of “employer and

employee” between the Bank and the canteen boys the dispute as much as the reference is not maintainable in the eye of

law. It has also challenged the merit of the claim on a contention that the canteen boys were neither employed nor

engaged by the Bank nor their wages was paid by the branches of the Bank. The Bank-Management has its own

recruitment rules and procedures for appointment of sub-staff cadres. As such the Bank had no role in the appointment of

canteen boys working in different branches. So far the award of CGIT, Calcutta and the settlements filed thereon are

concerned, it is the stand of the Management that in no point of time the Management-Bank had agreed to regularize the

services of 41/91 canteen boys unconditionally. The settlement was subject to condition and it was subject to the

approval of the Central Government. It is also the specific stand of the Management-Bank that the reference made to the

Tribunal of Calcutta as well as the award passed therein has no bearing with the present dispute and as such, this Tribunal

is not bound by the award given by the Tribunal of Calcutta. The present dispute has to be adjudicated on the basis of the

pleadings and evidence advanced in the present reference.

4.

On the aforesaid pleadings of the parties the following issues have been settled for proper adjudication of the

dispute.

ISSUES

1. Whether the action of the management of Indian Bank, Zonal Office, Bhubaneswar in not considering the case

of regularization of 8 numbers of canteen employ8ees (S/Shri Akshya Sahu, Dibakar Padhi, Dilip Kumar Patra,

Parikhit Nanda, Gauranga Chandra Nath, Prabhat Kumar Barik, Bijoy Kumar Dash and Niranjan Behera) who

are engaged by the Bank through Indian Bank Staff Canteen Committee for decades together in Bhubaneswar, is

appropriate and justified?

2. What relief the concerned workmen are entitled to?

5.

The parties have led oral as well documentary evidence in support of their respective claim. The 2nd Party-Union

has examined its Vice President and filed documents like copy of the award of CGIT, Kolkatta in I.D. case No. 47/1992,

copy of terms of the settlement along with list of 91 employees covered in the award of CGIT, Kolkatta, copy of the

orders of the Hon’ble Kokkatta High Court in W.P.(C) No. 2101/1999, copy of the order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court

dated 8.5.2009, copy of the letter dated 17.7.1995 issued by the Zonal Manager to the Regional Manager, copy of the

letter dated 7.8.1995 issued by the Regional Manager, copy of the letter dated 7.8.1995 of the Regional Manager issued

to Krushna Prasad to put-forth their claim, whereas the Management has examined its Branch Manager and exhibited

copy of the Management’s manual (staff welfare & concession in charges) to refute the claim.

FINDINGS

6.

For the sake of convenience all the issues are taken for consideration simultaneously.

It is apparent from the pleadings and evidence as well as argument of the 2nd party-Union that its claim is solely

based on the award given by the Tribunal of Calcutta and observation made by the Hon’ble High Court of Calcutta while

setting aside the award in favour of 50 canteen boys whose claim was not referred in the original reference made by the

Tribunal of Calcutta. According to the Union the Management having agreed and entered into a settlement for

regularization of 91 canteen boys it cannot back-out from the earlier settlement and take a different stand in the present

dispute. When it has recognized the claim of all canteen boys and entered into a settlement, its stand that no canteen is

being run by the management in the branches at Odisha is not acceptable. Admittedly, there is no serious dispute to the

claim of the Union that an award was given earlier by the CGIT, Calcutta for regularization of services of 91 canteen

boys in view of the settlement made between the parties. The present canteen boys were also named in the said award for

the purpose of regularization of their service. But, the award having been set aside by the Hon’ble High Court of Calcutta

on a contention that the original dispute was related to regularization of 41 canteen boys and the industrial adjudicator

has to go by the terms of the reference, the award has no bearing in the present reference. On a close reading of the said

award, the conciliation report filed before the said Tribunal and the order of the Hon’ble High Court of Calcutta which

are marked as Ext.-1 to Ext.-3, it is found that the Management-Bank had agreed for empanelment of canteen boys as its

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6855

sub-staff subject to approval by the Central Government. There is no evidence to establish that the Central Government

had already given approval for regularization of the original 41 canteen boys. Thus, the settlement was apparently a

conditioned one and as such it has no binding force on the Management in the present dispute. That apart, the settlement

between the parties, which is marked as Ext.-2, does not reveal that the Management-Bank had ever conceded that the

canteens, where the boys were working, belonged to him or those canteens were recognized by it. It was not also

conceded by the Bank in the said settlement that the canteen boys were engaged on its instance or they were working

under the control and supervision of the respective branches or it was paying wages to the canteen boys. In that view of

the matter the Management-Bank cannot be held to have taken any contradictory stand. On the other hand the order of

the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court reveals that the Hon’ble Court set aside the award so far canteen boys not named in the

original reference are concerned making an observation that for other 50 persons the Union would be entitled to raise a

similar dispute and such dispute can be resolved through reconciliation on the same terms and conditions so that those

50 persons can also be brought with the hot spot of the settlement to avoid further complication. Be that as it may, the

Management has no legal obligation to go for a reconciliation in the present dispute on the same terms and conditions as

made in its earlier settlement with the Union. No-where it has been estopped to take a different view than the earlier one.

That apart, the earlier settlement was subject to approval of the Central Government. No evidence has been adduced by

the 2nd Party-Union to show that the settlement made before the Calcutta Tribunal was approved by the Central

Government. In the above backdrops the pleadings and arguments advanced by the 2nd Party-Union has no force. The

present dispute has to be adjudicated on its own merit keeping in view the pleadings and evidence advanced before the

Tribunal.

Coming to the next issue on the merit of the dispute raised by the 2nd party-Union it is seen that the Management

has challenged the maintainability of the reference on a plea that the canteen boys are not its employees. Whereas, the

Union claims for regularization on a plea that the boys having worked for continuously a long period in the canteens of

the Management-Bank are to be regularized in the services of the Bank. The canteen are managed by a committee formed

by the Bank itself and the canteen having been run in the premises of the Bank, the boys working therein are to be

counted as workmen of the Bank. Before coming to the above pleadings of the parties it is profitable to mention here that

as per the principles set out by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case between Indian Overseas Bank Staff –versus- Indian

Overseas Bank & Anr. Reported in (1999) IIILLJ 621 Mad that the canteens run in the establishment of the employer are

to be classified into three categories; (i) statutory canteen which are required to be provided with subsidy in view of

Section 46 of the Factories Act, (ii) non-statutory recognized canteens which are established with the prior approval and

recognition of the employer and (iii) non-statutory/non-recognized canteen which are established without prior approval

or recognition of the employer. As per the settled principles of the Apex Court the employees in the statutory canteen are

the workmen/employees of the employer. In the case at hand no evidence has been adduced by the 2nd party-Union to

show that the canteens, where the boys are stated to have been working are statutory canteen or a non-statutory

recognized canteen. It is not also established that those canteens are established with the prior approval and recognition

of the Management-Bank. There is also no evidence to suggest that the Management had any role in establishing or

running those canteens. On the other hand, it is admitted by the witness of the 2nd party-Union that the Management-

Bank is in obligation to maintain a canteen in the branches wherever the number of employees is more than 30. No

evidence has been adduced that any branches of the Management-Bank has more than 30 numbers of employees. No

document or any paper is filed on behalf of the Union to support its claim that the canteen is a part and parcel of the

Management-Bank. On the other hand, the witness of the Management-Bank and the circular of the Management-Bank

(Ext.-A) support the stand of the Management-Bank that the Bank has an obligation only to provide space, furnitures,

fixtures and utensils free of cost for the canteen and in addition the canteen subsidy payable as per the guidelines

wherever the number of employees working in the Bank premises exceeds 75. As per the said circular canteen subsidy is

extended to all the staff members at the rate of Rs. 6/- per employee per working day towards cost of the item served to

the employee in the canteen. The subsidy is available to the subsidy administration committee of the branch. There is no

word in the said circular/guidelines about the obligation of the Management to run a canteen for its staff. That being the

position, burden lies heavily on the Union to establish that the canteens, where the boys are stated to have been working,

belonged to the Management and the disputant boys were working under the control and supervision and paying role of

the Bank. Admittedly, no oral or documentary evidence has been adduced in this regard to claim that the canteens are

either established or run by the Management-Bank and the disputants are working under the pay role of the Bank or their

work is supervised and controlled by the Management in any manner. When the employer and employee relationship has

not been established between the disputant canteen boys and the Management, a doubt can be entertained on the merit of

the dispute raised by the Union as well as maintainability of the reference. There is also no evidence before the Tribunal

as to how those eight canteen boys were employer/engaged and if the Management-Bank had any role in engaging them

to work as canteen boys or the Management was bearing their monthly wages. In absence of pleadings and evidence in

the above aspect, the demand of the Union towards regularization of services of canteen boys is not enforceable under the

provisions of the I.D. Act. Hence, the action of the Management in not regularizing the services of the canteen boys

cannot be hold illegal and unjustified.

For the reasons mentioned and discussed above the statement of claim preferred by the Union is rejected.

The reference is answered accordingly.

Dictated & Corrected by me.

B. C. RATH, Presiding Officer

6856

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ubZ fnYyh] 5 fnlEcj] 2018

dk-vk- 1783-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

Hkkjrh; LVsV cSad izca/k rarz ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k Hkqous’oj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 59@2017½ dks izdkf’kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

05@12@2018 izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&12012@115@2016&vkbZvkj ¼ch&1½]

Ckh- ,l- fc"V] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 5th December, 2018

S.O. 1783.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 59/2017) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court

Bhubaneswar as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of India and

their workmen, received by the Central Government on 05.12.2018.

[No. L-12012/115/2016-IR (B-1)]

B. S. BISHT, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT BHUBANESWAR

Present: Shri B.C. Rath, Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-cum-Labour

Court, Bhubaneswar.

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 59/2017

L-12012/115/2016 – IR(B-I), dated 13.09.2017

Date of Passing Order – 10th October, 2018

Between:

The Branch Manager,

State Bank of India,

At./Po. Birasal, Via-Badasuanlo,

Ps. Kankadahada, Dist. Dhenkanal.

…1st Party-Management.

(And)

Shri Debakanta Das,

S/o. Benudhar Das,

At./Po. Birasal, Via. Badasuanlo,

Dist. Dhenkanal, Odisha.

…2nd Party-Disputant.

Appearances:

Shri B.K. Mishra, Auth. Rep.

…

For the 1st Party- Management

None

…

For the 2nd Party- Disputant

ORDER

Authorized representative of the Management is present, whereas none appears on behalf of the

2nd party-Union on repeated calls. It is submitted by the authorized representative of the Management that the Union is

not taking any step in the proceeding for the last several adjournments and probably the Union has no interest to

prosecute the dispute. Perused the record. It is seen that after filing of the statements by the parties the 2nd party-Union is

not taking any steps for which the proceeding is adjourned without adjudication of the dispute. The reference case cannot

be protracted in such a manner for an indefinite period by giving mechanical adjournments awaiting the appearance of

the 2nd party-Union at its sweet will. As the 2nd party-Union fails to adduce any evidence and he has defaulted in

appearance, there is nothing before the Tribunal to adjudicate the dispute, which has been referred to.

2.

It is pertinent to mention here that until adjudication of the dispute referred to by the authority concerned, an

award cannot be made within the meaning of the award as defined under section 2(b) of the Act. There is also no

provision in the Act to pass a no-dispute award or a nil award in case the disputant fails to make appearance and

prosecute its claim. In that view of the matter passing of a no-dispute award or nil award for absence of the

disputant/parties would be a misconception and the above position has been settled by the Hon’ble High Court of Orissa

in the case between M/s. IDL Chemicals Limited –versus- P.O. Labour Court, Sambalpur reported in 72(1991)CLT 73

and in the decision of the Calcutta High Court in the case of B.R. Bermen and Mohatta (India) Pvt. Ltd., -versus-

Seventh Industrial Tribunal, West Bengal and others (short noted in 1977 Lab. I.C. (NOC) 13 (CAL). It has been also

held by the Hon’ble Courts that so long as the dispute remains unsettled and the proceeding came to an end without

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6857

adjudication of the dispute between the parties, there is no bar under the Act whereby the Government is precluded from

referring the dispute over again so that there may be an industrial adjudication as contemplated by the Act.

3.

Having regard to the above facts and circumstances as well as settled principles I am constrained to dismiss the

case registered on the reference of the dispute without any award and accordingly the reference is disposed of. A copy of

this order be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour for necessary action at their end.

Dictated & Corrected by me.

B. C. RATH, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 6 fnlEcj] 2018

dk- vk- 1784-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj ikjknhi

iksVZ VªLV ds izca/kr= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] Hkqous’oj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 22@2018½ dks izdkf’kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 06-12-

2018 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&38011@04@2017&vkbZvkj ¼ch&II½]

jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 6th December, 2018

S. O. 1784.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government

hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 22/2018) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Bhubaneswar as shown

in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Paradip Port Trust,, and their workmen, received by the

Central Government on 06.12.2018.

[No. L-38011/04/2017-IR (B-II)]

RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT BHUBANESWAR

Present: Shri B.C. Rath, Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-cum-Labour

Court, Bhubaneswar.

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 22/2018

L-38012/04/2017 – IR(B-II), dated 09.03.2018

Date of Passing Order – 17th October, 2018

Between:

1. The Chairman,

Paradip Port Trust, Paradip, Jagatsinghpur.

2. The General Manager,

M/s. J.M. Baxi & Co., At./Po. Paradip Port,

Paradip, Dist. Jagatsinghpur, Orissa.

…1st Party-Managements

(And)

The General Secretary,

Paradip Port Workers Union,

Badapadia, Paradip Port, Jagatsinghpur.

…2nd Party-Union

Appearances:

None

…

For the 1st Party- Managements

None

…

For the 2nd Party-Union

ORDER

Parties are absent on repeated calls. It is seen from the record that the Union is not taking any step in the

proceeding for the last several adjournments and probably the Union has no interest to prosecute the dispute. It is also

seen that the 2nd party-Union has not filed any statement of claim inspite of registered noticed issued to it on 13.8.2018.

The reference case cannot be protracted in such a manner for an indefinite period by giving mechanical adjournments

awaiting the appearance of the 2nd party-Union at its sweet will. As the 2nd party-Union fails to file any statement of

claim and he has defaulted in appearance, there is nothing before the Tribunal to adjudicate the dispute, which has been

referred to.

6858

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2.

It is pertinent to mention here that until adjudication of the dispute referred to by the authority concerned, an

award cannot be made within the meaning of the award as defined under section 2(b) of the Act. There is also no

provision in the Act to pass a no-dispute award or a nil award in case the disputant fails to make appearance and

prosecute its claim. In that view of the matter passing of a no-dispute award or nil award for absence of the

disputant/parties would be a misconception and the above position has been settled by the Hon’ble High Court of Orissa

in the case between M/s. IDL Chemicals Limited –versus- P.O. Labour Court, Sambalpur reported in 72(1991)CLT 73

and in the decision of the Calcutta High Court in the case of B.R. Bermen and Mohatta (India) Pvt. Ltd., -versus-

Seventh Industrial Tribunal, West Bengal and others (short noted in 1977 Lab. I.C. (NOC) 13 (CAL). It has been also

held by the Hon’ble Courts that so long as the dispute remains unsettled and the proceeding came to an end without

adjudication of the dispute between the parties, there is no bar under the Act whereby the Government is precluded from

referring the dispute over again so that there may be an industrial adjudication as contemplated by the Act.

3.

Having regard to the above facts and circumstances as well as settled principles I am constrained to dismiss the

case registered on the reference of the dispute without any award and accordingly the reference is disposed of. A copy of

this order be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour for necessary action at their end.

Dictated & Corrected by me.

B. C. RATH, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 6 fnlEcj] 2018

dk- vk- 1785-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj iatkc

us’kuy cSad ds izca/kr= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] dksydÙkk ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 23@2012½ dks izdkf’kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 06-12-

2018 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&39025@01@2017&vkbZvkj ¼ch&II]

jfo dqekj] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 6th December, 2018

S.O. 1785.— In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government

hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 23/2012) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Kolkata as shown in the

Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Punjab National Bank,, and their workmen, received by the

Central Government on 06.12.2018.

[No. L-39025/01/2017-IR(B-II)]

RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUN ALAT KOLKATA

Application No. CGIT-23 of 2012

(Under Section 2A of the I.D. Act, 1947)

Parties: Shri Asesh Kumar Mishra,

C/o. Shri Pinaki Sekhar Koyal,

149/3, A.C. Road (South),

Indrapasta, Khagra, Dist. Murshidabad,

Pin – 742103

…Applicant

Vs

1. The Zonal Manager,

Punjab National Bank,

West Bengal Zonal Office,

Apeejay House, 4th Floor,

Kolkata – 700016.

2. Punjab National Bank,

Circle Office at Fancy Market Complex,

G.T. Road, Burdwan – 713103.

3. Punjab National Bank,

Baharampur Branch, Khagra, Baharampur,

Dist. Murshidabad, Pin – 742103

…Opp. Parties

Present: Justice Ravindra Nath Mishra, Presiding Officer

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6859

Appearance:

On behalf of the Applicant : Mr. Ranjoy De, learned counsel.

On behalf of the Opposite Parties : Mr. Joginath Sahoo, Senior Manager (HRD)

State: West Bengal.

Industry: Banking

Dated: 28th November, 2018

AWARD

Bereft of unnecessary details, the brief facts of the case are that the Applicant, Shri Asesh Kumar Mishra who as

an employee of Punjab National Bank was posted at baharampur Branch. He was served with a chargesheet dated

22nd February, 2010 on the ground of misconduct that while working as Head Cashier at Baharampur Branch of the Bank

he made payment of Rs.8,30,000/= to a party on 10th March, 2009 without obtaining any cheque and at the end of the day

pretended shortage of Rs.8,30,000/= of cash in his custody. The reply of the Applicant was found not satisfactory,

therefore, enquiry was conducted as per provisions of bipartite settlement giving all opportunity to the Applicant to

defend his case. After completion of enquiry, report was submitted to the disciplinary authority holding charges leveled

against the Applicant proved. Before awarding punishment, the Applicant was given opportunity by the disciplinary

authority in which he regretted and cited mental stress, serious sufferings to him and family. He also undertook not to

repeat this type of mistake in future. After considering the enquiry report and explanation submitted by the Applicant, the

disciplinary authority confirmed the proposed penalty of compulsory retirement with superannuation benefits against

which appeal was preferred by the Applicant. However, the appellate authority rejected his appeal vide order dated 30th

December, 2010. Challenging the order of disciplinary authority dated 6th October, 2010 by which punishment of

compulsory retirement was imposed on the Applicant and the order of appellate authority dated 30th December, 2010

rejecting the appeal of the Applicant against punishment of compulsory retirement, this application under Section 2A of

the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 has been filed by the Applicant.

2.

The Applicant has challenged the punishment of compulsory retirement on the ground that the chargesheet dated

22nd February, 2010 is unsustainable in law and enquiry conducted by the Enquiry Officer against the Applicant is illegal,

invalid and improper one. He has also challenged the punishment of compulsory retirement being disproportionate,

improper and unjustified. Therefore, reinstatement with all consequential benefits has been claimed by the Applicant.

3.

The Opposite Party, Punjab National Bank has filed its written statement denying the allegations of the

Applicant and has pleaded interalia that the enquiry was conducted as per provisions of the bipartite settlement and the

Applicant was given all opportunity to defend his case. It has been further pleaded that the Applicant was posted in the

Branch on 1st of November, 2004 and according to his seniority and willingness he was re-designated as Head Cashier

which is not a post of promotion, but a special allowance carrying post only. On 10th March, 2009 he made payment of

Rs.8.30 lakh to the party without any debit authority causing shortage of cash. The Act of the Applicant was beyond the

purview of his duties and his activity was doubtful, therefore, FIR was lodged against him on 12th March, 2009 with the

Baharampur Police Station. It is further pleaded that good conduct, discipline and integrity are backbone of the

employees of the bank dealing with public money and no bank can keep in its employment a person whose conduct is not

upto the mark, who is indiscipline and whose integrity is doubtful. The charges leveled against the Applicant were grave

in nature and the punishment so imposed upon him commensurate to the gravity of the charges proved against the

Applicant.

4.

In reply to the written statement filed by the Opposite Party, Bank, the Applicant has also filed a rejoinder.

5.

As the validity of enquiry was challenged by the Applicant, this Tribunal took up that as a preliminary issue and

decided the same vide order dated 11th December, 2015 holding that the enquiry was valid, proper and conducted after

observing the principles of natural justice.

6.

After the enquiry having been held valid and legal, the next question for consideration is regarding the scope of

judicial review by the Tribunal under Section 11A of the Industrial Tribunal, 1947. Section 11A of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 reads as follows:

11A. Powers of Labour Courts, Tribunals and National Tribunals to give appropriate relief in case of

discharge or dismissal of workmen –

Where an industrial dispute relating to the discharge or dismissal of a workman has been referred to a Labour

Court, Tribunal or National Tribunal for adjudication and, in the course of the adjudication proceedings, the

Labour Court, Tribunal or National Tribunal, as the case may be, is satisfied that the order of discharge or

dismissal was not justified, it may, by its award, set aside the order of discharge or dismissal and direct re-

instatement of the workman on such terms and conditions, if any, as it thinks fit, or give such other relief to the

workman including the award of any lesser punishment in lieu of discharge or dismissal as the circumstances of

the case may require;

Provided that in any proceeding under this section the Labour Court, Tribunal or National Tribunal, as

the case may be, shall rely only on the materials on record and shall not take any fresh evidence in relation to the

matter.”

7.

Taking note of the words “in the course of adjudication”, Hon’ble the Supreme Court in M/s. Firestone Tyre &

Rubber Co. of India Ltd. v The Management, AIR 1973 SC 1227 has observed that

6860

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

“The words ‘in the course of adjudication proceedings, the Tribunal is satisfied that the order of discharge or

dismissal was not justified’ clearly indicate that the Tribunal is now clothed with the power of reappraise the

evidence in the domestic enquiry and satisfy itself whether the said evidence relied on by the employer

establishes the misconduct alleged against a workman. What was originally a plausible conclusion that could

be drawn by an employer from the evidence, has now given place to a satisfaction being arrived at by the

Tribunal that the finding of misconduct is correct. The limitation imposed on the powers of the Tribunal by

the decision in Indian Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. case law no longer be invoked by the employer. The Tribunal is

at liberty to consider not only whether the finding of misconduct recorded by an employer is correct but also

to differ from the said finding if a proper case is made out. What was once largely in the realm of the

satisfaction of the employer has ceased to be so and now it is the satisfaction of the Tribunal that finally

decides the matter.”

8.

After the enquiry has been held to be valid and legal, Hon’ble the Supreme Court has considered its effect in

Mavji C. Lakum v Central Bank of India, 2008 (7) SCALE 32 in the following words:

“……….Even if the enquiry is found to be fair, that would be only a finding certifying that all possible

opportunities were given to the delinquent and the principles of natural justice and fair play were observe. That

does not mean that the findings arrived at were essentially the correct findings. If the Industrial Tribunal comes

to the conclusion that the findings could not be supported on the basis of evidence given or further comes to the

conclusion that the punishment given is shockingly disproportionate, the Industrial Tribunal would still be

justified in re-appreciating the evidence and/or interfering with the quantum of punishment. There can be no

dispute that power under Section 11-A has to be exercised judiciously and the interference is possible only

when the Tribunal is not satisfied with the findings and further concludes that punishment imposed by the

Management is highly disproportionate with the degree of guilt of the workman concerned. Besides, the

Tribunal has to give reasons as to why it is not satisfied either with the findings or with the quantum of

punishment and that such reason should not be fanciful or whimsical but there should be good reasons.”

9.

Thus from the above pronouncements of the Hon’ble Apex Court it is established that the Tribunal has still

power to examine the correctness of the findings of the domestic enquiry as to whether findings are supported on the

basis of evidence on record. In other words the Tribunal can re-appreciate the findings of enquiry. However, the scope of

re-appreciation of evidence is again a matter of controversy. But in catena of cases it has been laid down that reappraisal

cannot be that of either or original or that of appellate court, but of revisionsal court. In Calcutta Jute Manufacturing

Company v. State of West Bengal, 2002-I-LLJ 224 (Calcutta High Court) it has been observed that –

“6. But that reappraisal cannot be that of either the original or of an appellate court, but of a revisional court.

Or, in other words, it is clothed with the additional power of reappraisal of evidence with a revisional court’s

outlook. The satisfaction of a court scrutinizing that an employer to justify the action. On such reappraisal it has

to satisfy itself that on such evidence the action could be justified. There remains a thin distinction in the

exercise of such jurisdiction. In the name reappraisal it cannot weigh the evidence in the same manner as an

original or appellate court when the enquiry is found to have been held validly.”

10.

Thus, it is clear that though the Industrial Tribunal has got power to reappraise the evidence available on record

of domestic enquiry, but at the same time the Tribunal has also to bear in mind the thin distinction between an

original/appellate decision and revisional decision, while examining for satisfaction about the justificatio0n of the action

taken by the employer/disciplinary authority.

11.

Scrutinizing the present case from the above angle, the allegations of misconduct against the workman

concerned was found to be proved by the evidence adduced during the enquiry. It is alleged that while working as Head

Cashier in the Bank he paid Rs.8,30,000/= to one customer of the Bank named Haren Mondal without debiting his

account and reported to the Branch Manager shortage of cash of Rs.8.30 lakh from his custody thereby jeopardized the

interest of the Bank. The workman concerned has not denied payment of amount to the customer on 10th March, 2009,

but he has claimed to have obtained a cheque and endorsement of Branch Manager to pay, against which payment was

made but there is nothing on record to show existence of cheue. The matter was reported to the Police Station. However,

the amount of Rs.8.30 lakh was deposited in cash by the customer, Shri Haren Mondal. These are the admitted facts as it

is evident from the representation submitted by the workman concerned. The workman, Shri Asesh Kumar Mishra had

informed the Investigating Officer of the case that on 10th March, 2009 at about 1.45 P.M. Shri Haren Mondal

approached him and handedover a cheque of Rs.8,30,000/= requesting for immediate payment. He has also mentioned in

his representation, Ext. W-2 that Haren Mondal has accounts in the concerned branch and is a respectable customer of

the branch. So he paid him amount hoping that everything will run well. But, unfortunately due to closure of bank credit

was not received in his account, hence cheque could not be paid. Though during enquiry, Enquiry Officer has concluded

that no trace of cheque was found, but the facts remain that Rs.8,30,000/= was paid by the concerned workman to Shri

Haren Mondal without debiting his account. This fact is also proved by the subsequent deposit of the amount on

16th March, 2009. In these circumstances, the conclusion of Enquiry Officer that the workman concerned paid

Rs.8,30,000/= to Shri Haren Mondal without debiting his account cannot be said to be based on no evidence or perverse.

The Tribunal acting reasonably cannot be said to come to a different conclusion. Therefore, no interference by this

Tribunal is warranted.

12.

Now the next point for consideration is only with regard to the punishment imposed. Where the enquiry has

been found to be valid and there is no perversity in the conclusion drawn by the Enquiry Officer, then only question

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6861

remains for consideration is whether the punishment of dismissal requires interference or not. In this regard Hon’ble the

Apex Court in Management of Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. v M. Mani, 2018 LLR 2 has observed:

“17. In our opinion, once the Labour Court upheld the departmental enquiry as being legal and proper then the

only question that survived for consideration before the Labour Court was whether the punishment of

“dismissal” imposed by the appellant to the respondents was legal and proper or it requires any interference in

its quantum.

18. In other words, the Labour Court should have then confined its enquiry to examine only one limited question

as to whether the punishment given to the respondents was, in any way, disproportionate to the gravity of the

charge leveled against them and this, the Labour Court should have examined by taking recourse to the

provisions ofSection 11-A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. ………”

13.

Thus where the action of the disciplinary authority is found to be harsh and disproportionate to the gravity of

charges leveled against the concerned workman, the Tribunal has power to interfere with the order of punishment and

grant appropriate relief. It is material to note here that the charges against the workman are not of misappropriation of

fund, but as a Head Cashier he failed to hold Bank’s cash in safe custody and thereby jeopardized the interest of the

Bank. It is not denied that the customer, Shri Haren Mondal to whom the amount was paid by the workman concerned

was not having account in the Bank. This fact is also not dispute that he had been instrumental in mobilizing fund for the

Bank in the past. So, in the present competitive atmosphere among banks in providing personalized services to the

customers, a favour by a bank employee to the extent of making hustle-free payment cannot be ruled out. It is admitted

fact that the amount paid to the customer was deposited by him after 4 days of lodging FIR. The integrity of the workman

concerned is not doubtful as it has been certified by the same Branch Manager to had lodged FIR. The Branch Manager,

Shri S.N. Mishra had given a certificate which is Exhibit M-03 that Shri Asesh Kumar Mishra is honest and dutiful an

helpful in mobilizing deposits and other bank’s business. It is further certified that he has been working in the Branch

since 1st November, 2004 and no adverse comment received about him and nothing was found against him since he had

taken charge of the Branch. On the basis of this certificate the criminal complaint lodged by the Branch Manager was

dropped by the Investigating Officer. Thus, only allegation against the workman can be said to be making of payment

against norms and rules of the Bank.

14.

Learned counsel for the workman has contended that It may be possible that the workman concerned acted

proactively in good faith in making payment which amounts to only an act of negligence, not amounting to misconduct,

but his intention cannot be said to be dishonest, as no manipulation in records was found. For his contention learned

counsel has relied on Narendra Kumar Tripathi v. Union of India & Others, CDJ 2010 Cal HC 417. It is true that there is

no finding of Enquiry Officer that the workman had acted with mala fide intention but his action in making payment

cannot be said to be error of judgment or act of negligence by any stretch of imagination. It was also not incorrect

judgment as payment was made intentionally knowing that it was not permissible under rules of the Bank. His act was

not consistent with due and faithful discharge of his duties. In Union of India v. J. Ahmed, AIR 1979 SC 1022 it has been

held that if a government servant conducts himself in a way which is not consistent with due and faithful discharge of his

duties, it is misconduct. Similarly, an error or omission resulting in serious or atrocious consequences amounts to

misconduct. Acting beyond one’s authority is by itself a breach of discipline and is misconduct. Thus in view of above

case law of the Hon’ble Apex Court conduct of workman was clearly misconduct.

15.

Though the workman is said to be an honest employee and there was no complaint against him in past, but his

conduct in making payment against rules of the Bank without debiting account cannot be justified only because he was

honest employee and have been instrumental in mobilizing fund and business of the Bank, but the punishment awarded

against him certainly appears to be harsh and disproportionate to the charges leveled against him and where the

punishment is disproportionate and harsh, the Tribunal has power to interfere with the punishment order of compulsory

retirement and award appropriate relief. In the facts and circumstances of the case, a lesser punishment would have

served the purpose. Throwing away a honest and upright employee from employment of the Bank is not only loss to the

Bank but also to the family of the employee concerned. While awarding the punishment the disciplinary authority did not

take into account the certificate, Exhibit M-03 issued by the Branch Manager regarding honesty of the workman. Thus

the charges proved are not that serious which warrant compulsory retirement.

16.

In view of above, punishment of compulsory retirement is liable to be set aside and lesser punishment of

stoppage of three increments permanently is justifiable. However, it is discretion of the management of the Bank to

permit him to work either in cash department or somewhere else.

17.

So far as back wages are concerned, no basis or formula can be laid down as to under what circumstances

payment of entire back wages should be allowed. It depends upon the facts and circumstances of each case. In U.P.

Brushware Corporation v Uday Narayan Pandey, (2006) 1 SCC 479 the Hon’ble Supreme Court has held that payment of

back wages is not automatic where the action of the management is set aside. It should not be granted mechanically only

because on technical ground or otherwise when an order of termination was found to be in contravention of the

provisions of the Act.

18.

Further in General Manager, Hariyana Roadways v. Rudhan Singh, (2005) 5 SCC 591 it has been held that

“8. There is no rule of thumb that in every case where the IndustrialTribunal gives a finding that the

termination of service was in violation of provisions of Section 25F of the Act, entire back wages should

beawarded. A host of factors like the manner and method of selection and appointment viz. whether after proper

advertisement of the vacancy or inviting applications from the employment exchange, nature of appointment,

6862

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

namely whether ad-hoc, short-term, daily wages, temporary or permanent in character, any special

qualification required for the job and the like should be weighed and balanced in taking a decision regarding

award of back wages. One of the important factors, which has to be taken into consideration is the length of

service which the workman rendered with the employer. If the workman had rendered a considerable period of

service and his services were wrongfully terminated, he may be awarded full or partial back wages keeping in

view the fact that at his age and qualification possessed by him, he may not be in a position to get another

employment. However, where the total length of service rendered by a workman is very small, award of back

wages for complete period viz. from the date of termination till the date of award, which our experience shows

is often quite large would be wholly inappropriate.”

19.

At the same time the workman is required to prove that he remained unemployed during the period in question.

Hon’ble the Supreme Court in Navartis Limited v. State of West Bengal, (2009) 3 SCC 124 has held that

“19. There can, however, be no doubt whatsoever that there has been a in the approach of this Court with

regard to payment of back wages. Back wages cannot be granted almost automatically upon setting aside an

order of termination inter alia on the premises that the burden to show that the workman

was

gainfully

employed during interregnum period was on the employer. This Court in a number of decisions opined that the

grant of back wages is not automatic. Burden of proof that he remained unemployedwould be on the workman

keeping in view the provisions of Section 106 of Evidence Act, 1872.”

20.

But, in the present case, it is not in dispute that the workman did not raise any plea in the statement of

claim/application that he was not gainfully employed during the said period. He has also not stated in his examination-in-

chief that he was not employed gainfully for the period in question. A burden lies on the workman to prove this fact and

in the present case the workman concerned has failed to do so, this Tribunal comes to the conclusion that the workman

concerned is not entitled to any back wages.

21.

Thus to conclude, the action of the management of Punjab National Bank in imposing punishment of

compulsory retirement by order dated 6th October, 2010 upon the workman, Shri Asesh Kumar Mishra being harsh and

disproportionate to the gravity of charges is set aside and reinstating him in service with a lesser punishment of stoppage

of three increments with cumulative effect is awarded to the workman concerned. However, he is not entitled to any back

wages. The workman should feel satisfied with his reinstatement.

22.

Application of the workman under Section 2A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is allowed accordingly.

Award is made accordingly.

JUSTICE RAVINDRA NATH MISHRA, Presiding Officer

Dated, Kolkata,

The 28th November, 2018

ubZ fnYyh] 7 fnlEcj] 2018

dk- vk- 1786-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj iatkc

xzkeh.k cSad izca/k rarz ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k ua 2 paMhx<+ ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 81@2014½ dks izdkf’kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 07-12-2018

izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&12012@59@2014&vkbZvkj ¼ch&1½]

Ckh- ,l- fc"V] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 7th December, 2018

S. O. 1786.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 81/2014) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No.2,

Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Punjab Gramin Bank and

their workmen, received by the Central Government on 07.12.2018.

[No. L-12012/59/2014-IR(B-1)]

B. S. BISHT, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT No. 2,

CHANDIGARH

ID No. 81/2014

Shri Amrik Singh ,

S/o. Shri Piara Singh,

H.No77 Germany Dass Park,

Kapurthala, Punjab.

…Workman/Claimant

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6863

Versus

The Chairman,

Punjab Gramin Bank,

Head office Jalandhar Road,

Kapurthala

Punjab.

… Management/Respondent

AWARD

This Award shall decide a reference which was made to this Tribunal by the Appropriate Government letter

No.L-12012/59/2014-IR(B-1) dated 3.12.2014 under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of

the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(in short the Act) for adjudication of an industrial dispute, terms of which are as under:

‘Whether the action of the management of Punjab Gramin Bank, Kapurthala, in terminating the services of Shri

Amrik Singh s/o. Shri Piara Singh vide order dated 31.1.2004 is just, valid and legal ? If not, to what relief the

workman is entitled for and what directions are necessary in the matter ?’

2.

Both parties were put to notice and the claimant., Shri Piara Singh filed his statement of claim, with the

averments that he was working as clerk cum cashier under the Management and vide order dated 31/1/2014 the

Disciplinary Authority imposed penalty of his removal from service which would not be a disqualification for future

employment. It is stated that before his removal from service, no legal charges were framed against him, though a vague

and baseless charge-sheet was served upon him and he was not given a reasonable opportunity to give reply to the charge

sheet. According to him, the Inquiry Officer conducted the inquiry illegally and arbitrarily and had rejected the demand

of the workman to summon the relevant record. Even otherwise, the punishment inflicted upon the workman is too

harsh and does not commensurate to the gravity of alleged charges inasmuch as the Management Bank has not suffered

any loss nor any harm has been caused to the reputation of the Bank. Prayer has been made for reinstatement of the

claimant with continuity of service and all consequential benefits.

3.

Management resisted the claim of the Workman, by filing written statement and took preliminary objections

that the workman has approached this Tribunal after a gap of 10 years and no proper explanation has been given by him

for the delay and therefore the present dispute is not maintainable. While denying the allegations of the claimant, it has

been stated that the claimant was found guilty of commission of serious major misconduct and fraudulent activities while

he was working as clerk cum cashier, for which a proper charge sheet dated 2/8/2003 was served upon him and he was

afforded proper opportunity of hearing. The enquiry officer had conducted the inquiry in fair and reasonable way and

adequate opportunity was given to the workman to defend his case. The enquiry Officer submitted his report dated

17/12/2003, on the basis of which the Disciplinary Authority had awarded major penalty of removal from service, upon

the workman, after opportunity of personal hearing was granted which was availed by the workman on 28/1/2004.

Against the order dated 31/1/2003 of the Disciplinary authority, the workman preferred a departmental appeal dated

23/2/2004 which was rejected by the Appellate Authority vide order dated 24/3/2004 as there was no merits in the

submissions of the workman. Thus, prayer has been made for dismissal of the claim petition.

4.

Number of opportunities were granted to the Claimant/workman to lead evidence in support of his claim but he

failed to adduce any evidence. He even did not enter the witness box either to substantiate the averments made in the

claim petition or to rebut the case of the Management. Perusal of the record shows that the claimant did not appear

before the Tribunal from 15/2/2018 onwards despite the fact that matter was adjourned time and again and ultimately this

Tribunal was constrained to reserve the matter for passing the award.

5.

In view of the fact that the claimant has not led any evidence in support of his case, this Tribunal is constrained

to pass No Dispute Award in the matter. Since the matter has not been decided on merits, there will be no bar for the

claimant to file afresh claim petition in accordance with law for adjudication of the controversy in issue or to seek any

other relief to which he is otherwise entitled to. Award is passed accordingly.

AVTAR CHAND DOGRA, Presiding Officer

नई िदल् ली, 7 िदसम् बर, 2018

का. आ. 1787. —कमर्चारी राज् य बीमा अिधिनयम 1948 (1948 का 34) की धारा-1 की उपधारा (3) ᳇ारा

पर्दᱫ शिक्तयᲂ का पर्योग करते हुए, केन् दर्ीय सरकार एत᳏ारा 1 िदसम् बर, 2018 को उस तारीख के रूप मᱶ िनयत करती है,

िजसको उक् त अिधिनयम के अध् याय-4 (44 व 45 धारा के िसवाय जो पहले से पर्वृᱫ हो चुकी है) अध् याय – 5 और 6 (धारा -

76 की उपधारा-(1) और धारा-77, 78, 79 और 81 के िसवाय जो पहले ही पर्वृᱫ की जा चुकी है) के उपबंध नागालᱹड राज् य

के िनम् निलिखत क्षेतर्ᲂ मᱶ पर्वृᱫ हᲂगे, अथार्त् –

6864

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

राज् य

िजला

राजस् व केन् दर्

नागालᱹड

मोकोकचुंग

मोकोकचुंग म् यूिनिसपल कᲅिसल

[सं. एस-38013/09/2018-एस.एस.I]

संतोष कुमार िसह, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 7th December, 2018

S.O. 1787.—In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-Section (3) of Section 1 of the Employees State

Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948), the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st December, 2018 as the date on which

the provisions of Chapter IV (except Section 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force) and Chapter-V and

VI (except Sub-Section (1) of Section 76 and Section 77, 78, 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force) of

the said Act shall come into force in the following areas of State of Nagaland namely : -

STATE

DISTRICT

ALL THE AREAS FALLING UNDER

NAGALAND

Mokokchung

Mokokchung MUNICIPAL COUNCIL

[No. S-38013/09/2018-S.S.I]

S. K. SINGH, Under Secy.

ubZ fnYyh] 7 fnlEcj] 2018

dk- vk- 1788-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh; ljdkj

esllZ ,e-lh-,y- ds izca/k ra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] Hkqous’oj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 78/2016½ dks izdkf’kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh;

ljdkj dks 04-12-2018 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&22013@01@2018&vkbZvkj ¼lh,e&II)]

jktsUnz flag] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 7th December, 2018

S. O. 1788.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 78/2016) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,

Bhubaneswar as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s M.C.L and their

workmen, received by the Central Government on 04.12.2018.

[No. L-22013/01/2018-IR (CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT BHUBANESWAR

Present: Shri B.C. Rath, Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-cum-Labour

Court, Bhubaneswar.

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 78/2016

(Filed under section 2-A(2) of the I.D. Act)

Date of Passing Order – 5th June, 2018

Between:

1. M/s. Guru Gobinda Logistics Pvt. Ltd. (Contractor),

Ananta Opencast Project Area, C/o. MCL,

Near Siva Mandir, Po. - Dera Colliery,

Talcher, Dist. Angul, Odisha.

2. General Manager, Bharatpur Opencast Project,

Mahanadi Coalfields Limited,

At./Po. Talcher, Dist. Angul, Odisha.

1st Party-Managements

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6865

(And)

Shri Biren Sahoo,

At./Po. Ghantapada, Via-Dera,

P.S. Colliery, Dist. Angul, Odisha, Pin-759 103.

…2nd Party-Disputant

Appearances:

Auth. Representatives.

…

For the 1st Party- Managements

Shri Biren Sahoo.

…

For himself the 2nd Party- Disputant

ORDER

The 2nd party-applicant and the authorized representatives of the Managements are present. A petition is moved

on behalf of the 2nd party-applicant wherein prayer has been made for withdrawal of the dispute on a contention that he

had voluntarily abandoned and resigned from service on his own accord on 31.3.2015 and he raised an industrial dispute

being instigated by others. Hence, the matter has been resolved amicably and he is no more interested to prosecute the

dispute. On being read-over and explained on the content of the petition, the workman admits to have filed the petition

voluntarily without being influenced by any one. He, further, submits that he is aware of the contents of the petition

which is drafted as per his instruction and knowing the contention to be correct he signed the same. Having regard to the

submission advanced by the 2nd party-applicant the application under section 2-A(2) stands dismissed on being

withdrawal of the dispute by the 2nd party-applicant.

Dictated & Corrected by me.

B. C. RATH, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 7 fnlEcj] 2018

dk- vk- 1789-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ

flaxkjsuh dksfy;jht daiuh fyfeVsM ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd

fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] xksnkofj[kkuh ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k – 85/2015½ dks izdkf’kr

djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 04-12-2018 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&22013@01@2018&vkbZvkj ¼lh,e&II]

jktsUnz flag] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 7th December, 2018

S.O. 1789.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 85/2015) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,

Godavarikhani as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries

Company Ltd., and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 04.12.2018.

[No. L-22013/01/2018-IR (CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CHAIRMAN, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT-CUM-VI ADDL.DIST. &

SESSIONS COURT, GODAVARIKHANI

Present: SRI SAMBASIVA RAO NAIDU,

Chairman-cum-Presiding Officer,

TUESDAY, ON THIS THE 14th DAY OF AUGUST, 2018

I.D.No. 85 of 2015

Between:

Jilukara Lingaiah, S/o.Lachaiah, age 52 years,

Occ:Ex.Coal Filler Relay C place of work RK 5 Section SRP,

R/o.Q.No.ST2-338, Bus stand colony, Godavarikhani (T)

of Ramagundam Mandal of Karimnagar District.

…Applicant/Workman- Petitioner

6866

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

AND

1.

The General Manager, SCCL Collieries Company Ltd., Srirampoor, Adilabad.

2.

The Superintendent of Mines, RK-5 Incline, Srirampoor Area, SCCL Collieries Company Ltd., Srirampoor,

Adilabad Dsitrict.

3.

The Chairman and Managing Director,

SCCL Collieries Company Ltd., Kothagudem

… Employer/Respondents/Management

This case coming before me for final hearing in the presence of Kum. E.Shobharani, Advocate for the Petitioner and of

Sri D.Krishna Murthy, Advocate for the Respondents; and having been heard and having stood over for consideration till

this day, the Tribunal delivered the following:-

AWARD

1.

This is a petition filed by petitioner under section 2A (2) of Industrial Disputes Act which herein after will be

referred as ID Act for convenience sake with a prayer to set aside the dismissal order vide proceedings reference

No.SRP/PER/13.008/1688, dt.29-04-2014 and to direct the respondent No.1 to 3 to reinstate the petitioner into service

with continuity of service, attendant benefits and full back wages. The following is the brief case of petitioner as per his

petition:

2.

The petitioner was appointed as Badli Filler on 01-11-1989 on piece rate wages at GDK 6 Incline, his service

was regularized and was appointed as coal filler w.e.f., 01-01-1995. He was discharging his duties as per the directions

of the management without causing any loss and he served the company a lot. The 1st respondent issued a charge sheet

against the petitioner alleging that he was absent from duties without sufficient cause and without sanction of leave from

01-01-2011 to 31-12-2011. A charge sheet in the following terms has been served on the petitioner on 07-06-2012:

“Absent from duty without sanctioned leave or sufficient cause or over staying beyond sanctioned leave”.

3.

The 1st respondent has alleged that the copy of charge sheet was sent to the petitioner through registered post

with acknowledgement due and it was returned undelivered by the postal authorities. An enquiry officer was appointed

by the 1st respondent and the said enquiry officer conducted enquiry on 20-09-2012 in the presence of presenting officer

by name P.Mallaiah, office superintendent G.Mohan, Senior Assistant, RK-5 Incline and S.Lingaiah, General Mazdoor.

The petitioner was absent during the enquiry, the 1st respondent has claimed that notice was not served on the petitioner

thereby a copy of the said notice was published in Andhra Jyothi Telugu Daily newspaper dt.06-09-2012 with a direction

to the petitioner to attend enquiry on 20-09-2012. The 1st respondent dismissed the petitioner w.e.f., 05-05-2014. The

petitioner has further pleaded that a criminal case vide Cr.No.175/2007 for the offence under sections 302, 120-B IPC

was registered by police Ramakrishnapur. The petitioner was shown as A-4. He has faced the trial before III Addl.

Sessions Judge (FTC), Asifabad in S.C.No.315/2009. The petitioner while furnishing the details of the said criminal case

further pleaded that on the complaint of D.Thara that her brother by name Ch.Sudhakar was killed near Edgah (Dargah)

of Ramakrishnapur a case was registered and the petitioner herein was shown as accused No.4. After the trial the learned

III Addl. Sessions Judge, Asifabad convicted the petitioner and other (4) accused on 08-02-2010 and sentenced them to

undergo imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs.3000/- each. The petitioner was in jail till 2013, his appeal was

allowed by Hon’ble High Court. The petitioner herein was acquitted and released on 04-08-2014. Thereafter he has

obtained the copies of dismissal order from the respondent. The petitioner claims that on 09-02-2010 there was a news in

all the news papers about the above referred criminal case and involvement of petitioner herein. Since he was in jail he

could not inform the respondents about his detention. Even though the respondents have got information, they did not

sent any notice to the petitioner nor they tried to serve the notice through jailor, but proceeded with the enquiry.

4.

Therefore, according to the petitioner he was not having any information about the enquiry. The enquiry was

conducted without service of proper notice on the petitioner. He has also pleaded that the witnesses who were examined

at the time of enquiry also got knowledge about the criminal case and imprisonment of the petitioner. The son of the

petitioner informed the authorities about the criminal case and that his father was in jail. Even at the time of enquiry the

son of the petitioner informed the officials that his father was in jail. Therefore, now the petitioner claims that the above

said enquiry results his dismissal from service but in view of the said criminal case he could not participate in the

enquiry. As such now he is praying for setting aside the dismissal order and for reinstatement into service with all back

wages and attendant benefits. The respondents have opposed this application and R-1 filed a counter which was adopted

by the remaining two respondents. The following is the brief case of respondents as per their counter:

5.

The petitioner was appointed as Badli Filler on 01-03-1988, he was regularized as coal filler on 03-01-1995.

The respondents have disputed the claim of petitioner that he worked to the satisfaction of the management and put the

petitioner to strict proof of his case. The respondents have pleaded that the petitioner was never regular to his duties, he

was a chronic absentee who was never put in required musters. Earlier he was served charge sheet dt.26-03-2011 for his

unauthorized absenteeism during 2010. After completing disciplinary proceedings he was reverted by (3) special piece

rated allowance with cumulative effect vide proceedings dt.25-06-2012. The services of the employees of Singareni

Collieries Company are covered by company standing orders. According to the section 52 (2) of Mines Act underground

employee required to put minimum musters of 190 and for surface employee 240 days in a year. The petitioner being

underground employee he is expected to put him 190 musters in a calendar year. He never put such minimum musters.

In 2011 he was charge sheeted under clause 25.31 of company’s standing orders. The respondents have furnished the

attendance particulars of the petitioner which indicates his attendance in 2007 was 147 and in 2008 it was 155, in 2009 it

was 202 whereas in 2010 it was 28. He did not attend the duty from 2011 to 2013. In view of the above stated failure of

¹Hkkx IIμ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % fnlEcj 15] 2018@vxzgk;.k 24] 1940

6867

the petitioner he was served with a charge sheet about his absence to the duties. Since he was continuously absent the

charge sheet was sent to the residence of petitioner by registered post by acknowledgement due but it was returned un-

delivered. The respondents got the notice published in Andhra Jyothi Telugu newspaper dt.26-09-2012. The petitioner

was informed to attend the enquiry scheduled on 20-09-2012 but he failed to appear before the enquiry officer. As such

an exparte enquiry was conducted on 20-09-2012. The enquiry officer submitted report against the petitioner herein. A

show cause notice was sent to him through registered post which was also returned un-served. Therefore, the

respondents got published the said notice in Andhra Jyothi Telugu Daily newspaper dt.28-06-2013. There was no

response from the respondents thereby the petitioner was removed from the service and dismissal order was displayed on

the notice board on the respondent company on 05-05-2014. The respondents have claimed that they are not aware of the

criminal case filed against the petitioner herein. They have no information nor they have received any letter dt.15-01-

2011. Therefore, according to the respondents they have followed the procedure and the petitioner was removed from

service due to his continuous absence to the duties.

6.

The respondents have further pleaded there were more than Rs.60,000/- employees which includes workers,

executives, supervisors, the production result will depend upon each and every employee they are interlinked. If any one

remains absent without prior permission, the work to be performed get effected. The unauthorized absence creates

sudden void, which at times difficult to fill up and there will be no proper planning. Therefore, the respondent company

is compelled to take severe action against the unauthorized absentees. The petitioner is one such unauthorized absentee

having put nil musters and failed to improve his attendance and work performance thereby the respondent prayed for

dismissal of the petition.

7.

When the matter is posted for enquiry the petitioner filed petition under section 11-A of Industrial Disputes Act

on 04-04-2017 and reported no objection against the enquiry proceedings. For convenience sake I am reproducing what

the petitioner has stated in the said petition.

“In the afore said the applicant/workmen-petitioner filed application set aside the illegal dismissal from the

service vide proceedings dated 29-04-2014 and directed the respondent to reinstate the petitioner in to service

with continuity of service, together with all attendant benefits and with full back wages. The petitioner is not

disputing the procedure and validity of domestic enquiry but the finding are perverse and bias. The Hon’ble

Court has got wide powers and in the interest of justice pleased to proceed with the case by the material

available on record and be pleased to not to make any fresh evidence in relation of the matter.’’

8.

Therefore, when once he filed a memo under section 11-A of Industrial Disputes Act and reported his

satisfaction to the domestic enquiry he cannot question the manner in which it was conducted. In the petition itself the

petitioner has categorically stated that he is not disputing the procedure and validity of the domestic enquiry but

according to him findings given by the enquiry officer are perverse and biased.

Therefore, the point for consideration is whether the findings of the enquiry officer are perverse or biased, if

so, whether the petitioner can be reinstated into service?

9.

The respondents did not dispute the claim of the petitioner that he was involved in a criminal case and he was

sentenced to life imprisonment and he was in jail for (5) years and later his appeal was allowed by the Hon’ble High

Court etc. In the counter they have claimed that they are not aware of the criminal proceedings. When once the

petitioner is sentenced to life imprisonment it may not be possible for him to proceed in the enquiry and to place his

claim before the enquiry officer. However in the light of his own petition under section 11-A of Industrial Disputes Act,

now the petitioner cannot question the procedure adopted by the enquiry officer and he cannot question the domestic

enquiry. The petitioner claimed that he was convicted by the III Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Asifabad on 08-02-

2010. Therefore, he cannot attended the duties from 08-02-2010 however in the counter the respondents have

categorically stated that the petitioner was a chronic absentee, he did not put required musters even in 2007, 2008, his

attendance in 2007 was 147 whereas in 2008 it was 155. As per the attendance furnished by the respondent the petitioner

has put 202 musters in 2009. According to his own claim the petitioner was involved for a murder case and he was

sentenced to life imprisonment. Therefore, he could not have attended the duties in 2010. There is no explanation from

the petitioner for his failure in attending the required musters during 2007, 2008. The petitioner having accepted the

domestic enquiry by way of filing petition under section 11-A of Industrial Disputes Act, now cannot question the

procedure adopted by the enquiry officer. Since, he did not attend the required musters in 2007, 2008. The findings of

the enquiry officer about his continuous absence and about his guilt cannot be set aside. The petitioner was rightly

dismissed from service for his absence to the duties. As such, the petitioner is not entitled to any relief and the present

petition is liable to be dismissed.

10.

In the result, the Industrial Dispute is dismissed.

Dictated to Senior Stenographer, transcribed by him, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court, on this the 14th

day of August, 2018.

SAMBASIVA RAO NAIDU, Chairman-cum-Presiding Officer

6868

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2018/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR WORKMAN:-

FOR MANAGEMENT;-

-Nil-

-Nil-

EXHIBITS

FOR WORKMAN:-

Ex.W-1

Dt.

16-09-2009

C.C., of judgment in SC.No.19/2009

Ex.W-2

Dt.

14-06-2016

Release certificate

Ex.W-3

Dt.

14-06-2016

Release certificate

Ex.W-4

Dt.

30-08-2011

Original charge sheet

Ex.W-5

Dt.

20-08-2011

Enquiry report

Ex.W-6

Dt.

20-09-2012

Enquiry proceedings

Ex.W-7

Dt.

29-04-2014

Dismissal order

Ex.W-8

Dt.

08-02-2014

C.C., of judgment in S.C.No.315/2009

Ex.W-9

Dt.

18-07-2014

C.C., of judgment in Crl.A.No.279/2010 of Hon’ble High Court

Ex.W-10

Dt.

15-09-2011

Acknowledgement

Ex.W-11

Dt.

04-08-2014

Release order central prison, Warangal

Ex.W-12

Dt.

17-08-2015

Office copy of demand letter postal receipt

Ex.W-13

Dt.

--

Postal receipt

Ex.W-14

Dt.

--

Acknowledgement

FOR MANAGEMENT:-

Ex.M-1

Dt.

25-06-2012

Punishment order

Ex.M-2

Dt.

07-05-2012

Charge sheet

Ex.M-3

Dt.

06-09-2012

Charge sheet-cum-Enquiry notice published in Andhra Jyothi Telugu Daily News

Paper

Ex.M-4

Dt.

20-09-2012

Enquiry proceedings

Ex.M-5

Dt.

21-09-2012

Enquiry report

Ex.M-6

Dt.

20-05-2013

Notice

Ex.M-7

Dt.

--

Un-delivered postal cover with acknowledgement

Ex.M-8

Dt.

28-06-2013

Show cause notice published in Andhra Jyothi daily News Paper

Ex.M-9

Dt.

29-04-2014

Dismissal order

Ex.M-10

Dt.

29-04-2014

Copy of Dismissal order posted on the notice board by taking signature of two

witnesses.

Uploaded by Dte. of Printing at Government of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi-110064

and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi-110054. ALOK

KUMAR

Digitally signed by

ALOK KUMAR

Date: 2018.12.31

15:58:59 +05'30'