1250 GI/2019

(983)

jftLVªh la- Mh- ,y- (,u) 04@0007@2003µ05

REGD. No. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05

izkf/dkj ls izdkf'kr

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

lkIrkfgd

WEEKLY

la- 10]

ubZ fnYyh] ekpZ 3—ekpZ 9] 2019] 'kfuokj@iQkYxqu 12—iQkYxqu 18] 1940

No. 10]

NEW DELHI, MARCH 3—MARCH 9, 2019, SATURDAY/ PHALGUNA 12— PHALGUNA 18, 1940

bl Hkkx esa fHkUu i`"B la[;k nh tkrh gS ftlls fd ;g i`Fkd ladyu ds :i esa j[kk tk lds

Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

Hkkx II—[k.M 3—mi&[k.M (ii)

PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)

Hkkjr ljdkj ds ea=kky;ksa (j{kk ea=kky; dks NksM+dj) }kjk tkjh fd, x, lkafof/d vkns'k vkSj vf/lwpuk,a

Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India

(Other than the Ministry of Defence)

िव मंालय

(िवीय सेवाएं िवभाग)

नई द ली, 25 फरवरी, 2019

का.आ.

का.आ. 316

316

316.—राीय कृिष और ामीण िवकास बक अिधिनयम, 1981 (1981 का 61) क धारा 6 क उप-धारा

(1) के खंड (घ) 'ारा (द) शि+य, का (योग करते 0ए, के23ीय सरकार, एत4ारा, 5ी सुची23 िम5 के 8थान पर 5ी राजीव

कुमार, सिचव, िव)ीय सेवाएं िवभाग, िव) मं<ालय, नई दली को त=काल (भाव से अथवा अगले आदेश, तक, राीय कृिष

और ामीण िवकास बक (नाबाड?) के िनदेशक म@डल मA िनदेशक के पद पर नािमत करती है।

[फा. सं. 7/11/2018-एसी]

ए. के. दास, उप सिचव

984

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 9, 2019/PHALGUNA 18, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

MINISTRY OF FINANCE

(Department of Financial Services)

New Delhi, the 25^th February, 2019

S.O. 316.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 6 of the National

Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development Act, 1981 (61 of 1981), the Central Government, hereby nominates Shri

Rajiv Kumar, Secretary, Department of Financial Services, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi as a Director on the Board of

Directors of National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD), with immediate effect or until further

orders, vice Shri Suchindra Misra,

[F. No. 7/11/2018-AC]

A. K. DAS, Dy. Secy.

नई द ली, 5 माच?, 2019

का.आ.

का.आ. 317

317

317.—बीमांकक अिधिनयम, 2006 (2006 का 35) क धारा 12 क उप-धारा (2) के खंड (ख) (i) 'ारा

(द) शि+य, का (योग करते 0ए, के2 3ीय सरकार, एत4ारा, भारतीय बीमांकक सं8 थान क पIरषद मA, िव) मं<ालय का

(ितिनिधत् व करने के िलए, 5ी एन. 5ीिनवास राव के 8 थान पर 5ी लिलत कुमार, आLथ?क सलाहकार, िव)ीय सेवाएं िवभाग

को त= काल (भाव से और अगले आदेश, तक, सद8 य के Mप मA नािमत करती है।

[फा. सं. एम-18013/01/2011-बीमा-I]

मृ= यु2 जय Nसंह, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 5th March, 2019

S.O. 317.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (b)(i) of Sub-Section (2) of Section 12 of the

Actuaries Act, 2006 (35 of 2006), the Central Government hereby nominates Sh. Lalit Kumar, Economic Advisor,

Department of Financial Services as a member of the Council of the Institute of Actuaries of India to represent the

Ministry of Finance vice Sh. N. Srinivasa Rao, with immediate effect, till further orders.

[F. No. M-18013/01/2011-Ins.1]

MRITUNJAY SINGH, Under Secy.

िवदेश

िवदेश मंालय

मंालय

(सी.पी.वी. भाग)

नई द ली, 22 जनवरी, 2019

का.आ.

का.आ. .318

318

318— राजनियक और क,सुलीय अिधकारी (शपथ एवं फस) के अिधिनयम, 1948 क धारा 2 के खंड (क)

के अनुसरण मA वैधािनक आदेश।

एत4ारा, कA 3 सरकार भारत के क,सलावास सान Pाि2स8 को मA यूसुफ जमाल सहायक अनुभाग अिधकारी को

दनांक 22 जनवरी 2019 से सहायक क,सुलर अिधकारी के तौर पर क,सुलर सेवाT के िनव?हन के िलए (ािधकृत करती है।

[सं. टी. 4330/02/2019]

(काश च2द, िनदेशक (क,सुलर)

MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS

(CPV DIVISION)

New Delhi, the 22nd January, 2019

S.O. 318.—Statutory Order : In pursuance of the clause (a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular

Officers (Oaths and fees) Act, 1948 (41 of 1948), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Yusuf Jamal, Assistant

Section Officer in the CGI, San Francisco to perform Consular services as Assistant Consular Officer with effect from

22 January 2019.

[No.T.4330/02/2019]

PRAKASH CHAND, Director (Consular)

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ekpZ 9] 2019@iQkYxqu 18] 1940

985

नई द ली, 28 जनवरी, 2019

का.

का. आ.

आ.

आ. 319

319

319.—राजनियक और क,सुलीय अिधकारी (शपथ एवं फस) के अिधिनयम, 1948 क धारा 2 के खंड (क)

के अनुसरण मA वैधािनक आदेश ।

एतद् 'ारा, कA 3 सरकार भारत के राजदूतावास, दी हेग मA 5ी वUण पंवार, सहायक अनुभाग अिधकारी को दनांक

28 जनवरी 2019 से सहायक क,सुलर अिधकारी के तौर पर क,सुलर सेवाT के िनव?हन के िलए (ािधकृत करती है।

[सं. टी. 4330/01/2015]

(काश च2द, िनदेशक (क,सुलर)

New Delhi, the 28, January, 2019

S.O. 319.—Statutory Order : In pursuance of the clause (a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular

Officers (Oaths and fees) Act, 1948 (41 of 1948), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Varun Panwar,

Assistant Section Officer in Embassy of India, The Hague to perform Consular services as Assistant Consular Officer

with effect from 28 January 2019.

[No.T.4330/01/2015]

PRAKASH CHAND, Director (Consular)

dkfeZd] yksd f'kdk;r rFkk isa'ku ea=ky;

¼dkfeZd vkSj izf'k{k.k foHkkx½

ubZ fnYyh] 22 Qjojh] 2019

dk-vk- 320-&dsUnz ljdkj] fnYyh fo’ks"k iqfyl LFkkiuk vf/kfu;e] 1946 ¼1946 dk vf/kfu;e la 25½ dh /kkjk 5 dh

mi/kkjk ¼1½ lifBr /kkjk 6 }kjk iznRr 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] izeq[k lfpo x`g] mRrj izns’k 'kklu] y[kuÅ ds

fnukad 12 vizSy] 2018 ds vkns’k la[;k 02 lhchvkbZ@VI&iq-&4&2017&1 ¼24½ ch@2018 ds rgra nh xbZ lgefr ls xEHkhj

/kks[ksckth vUos"k.k laxBu ¼,l-,Q-vkbZ-vks-½ }kjk bu nLrkostksa ds laca/k esa muds vUos"k.k ds nkSjku 07 can feyksa uker%

nsofj;k] cjsyh] y{kehxat] gjnksbZ] jkedksyk] fNrkSuh vkSj ckjkcadh ds Øsrk }kjk izLrqr bZ-vks-vkbZ- lg vkj-,Q-D;w- ,oa vkj-

,Q-ih- lfgr tkyh nLrkostksa dh izLrqfr ds laca/k esa vkSj mRrj izns’k jkT; phuh fuxe fyfeVsM dh fofØr 21 phuh feyksa

ds foØ; esa vkijkf/kd ea’kk ls dh xbZ vfu;ferrkvksa ds laca/k esa tkap@vUos"k.k djus ds fy, rFkk blds vfrfjDr] bl

laca/k esa rFkk mu ekeyksa ds nkSjku vFkok mUgha rF;ksa ls mRiUu vU; vijk/k@vijk/kksa ls lacaf/kr "kM;a= ds laca/k esa Fkkuk&

xkserhuxj] ftyk y[kuÅ esa iathd`r Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ¼1860 dh vf/kfu;e la[;k 45½ dh /kkjk 420] 468] 477 ,] 471

,oa /kkjk 629, dEiuh vf/kfu;e] 1956 ds vUrZxr eqdnek vijk/k la[;k & 1409@2017 ds lEiw.kZ mÙkj izns'k esa vkxs

vUos"k.k djus ds fy, fnYyh fo’ks"k iqfyl LFkkiuk ds lnL;ksa ds dk;Z{ks= vkSj 'kfDr;ksa dks ,rn}kjk foLrkfjr djrh gSA

[Qk- la- 228@12@2018&,ohMh-II]

,l- ih- vkj- f=ikBh] voj lfpo

MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS

(Department Of Personnel And Training)

New Delhi, the 22nd February, 2019

S.O. 320.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section(1) of section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi

Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (Act No. 25 of 1946), the Central Government with the consent of the State

Government of Uttar Pradesh, conveyed vide Home (Police), Section–4, order No.–02 C.B.I./VI-P-4-2017-1 (24)B/2018,

Lucknow dated 12 April, 2018, hereby extends powers and Jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police

Establishment in whole of the State of Utter Pradesh for conducting enquiry/ investigation regarding submission of

forged documents with EOI cum RFQ and RFP submitted by purchaser of 7 closed mills viz Deoria, Bareilly,

Laxmiganj, Hardoi, Ramkola, Chittauni and Barabanki as reported by Serious Fraud Investigation Organization (SFIO)

during their investigation regarding these documents and the irregularities committed with a criminal intent in the entire

sale proceedings of 21 sugar mills by the U.P. State Sugar Corporation Ltd. and for further investigation of FIR No.

986

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 9, 2019/PHALGUNA 18, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1409/2017 under section 420, 468, 477A, 471 IPC and section 629 A Companies Act 1956, registered at P.S. Gomti

Nagar, Distt. Lucknow in this regard and conspiracy in relation there to other offence/offences committed in the course

of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts.

[F. No. 228/12/2018-AVD-II]

S.P.R. TRIPATHI, Under Secy.

नागर िवमानन मंालय

(एएआई अनुभाग

एएआई अनुभाग

एएआई अनुभाग)

नई द ली, 11 फरवरी, 2019

का.आ.

का.आ. 321

321

321.—भारतीय िवमानप= तन (ािधकरण अिधिनयम, 1994 (1994 का संV या 55) के खंड 3 तथा खंड 5

के उप-खंड 1(ii) मA (द= त शि+य, के उपयोग से के2 3 सरकार एत4ारा त= काल (भाव से तीन वषW अथवा आगामी आदेश,

तक, इनमA से जो भी पहले हो, नागर िवमानन मं<ालय के िनY निलिखत अिधकाIरय, क िनयुि+ भारतीय िवमानप= तन

(ािधकरण के िनदेशक मंडल मA अंश-कािलक सद8 य के Mप मA करती है:

5ी अMण कुमार, अपर सिचव एवं िव= त सलाहकार, नागर िवमानन मं<ालय, सु5ी गाग[ कौल, पूव? अपर सिचव

एवं िव= त सलाहकार, नागर िवमानन मं<ालय के 8 थान पर।

5ीमती Mिबना अली, संयु\ त सिचव, नागर िवमानन मं<ालय

[सं. एवी-24015/2/2015-एएआई-एमओसीए]

पी. जे. थॉमस, अवर सिचव

MINISTRY OF CIVIL AVIATION

(AAI Section)

New Delhi, the 11^st February, 2019

S.O. 321.—In exercise of the powers conferred under Section 3 and sub-section 1(ii) of Section 5 of the

Airports Authority of India Act, 1994 (No. 55 of 1994), the Central Government hereby appoints following Officers of

the Ministry of Civil Aviation as part-time Members on the Board of Airports Authority of India with immediate effect

for a period of three years or until further orders, whichever is earlier:

Shri Arun Kumar, Additional Secretary & Financial Advisor, Ministry of Civil Aviation vice Ms. Gargi Kaul,

former AS&FA, Ministry of Civil Aviation

Smt. Rubina Ali, Joint Secretary, Ministry of Civil Aviation

[No. AV-24015/2/2015-AAI-MOCA]

P. J. THOMAS, Under Secy.

dks;yk ea=ky;

ubZ fnYyh] 5 ekpZ] 2019

dk-vk- 322-&dsUnzh; ljdkj us dks;yk /kkjd {ks= ¼vtZu vkSj fodkl½ vf/kfu;e] 1957 ¼1957 dk 20½ ¼ftls blesa

blds i’pkr~ mDr vf/kfu;e dgk x;k gS½ dh /kkjk 7 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ ds v/khu tkjh Hkkjr ljdkj ds dks;yk ea=ky; dh

vf/klwpuk la[;k dk-vk- 6] rkjh[k 2 tuojh] 2018] vkSj tks Hkkjr ds jkti= Hkkx II] [k.M 3] mi&[k.M ¼iia½] rkjh[k

6 tuojh] 2018 esa izdkf’kr dh xbZ Fkh] ml vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa 427-993 gsDVs;j ¼yxHkx½ ;k 1057-57 ,dM+

¼yxHkx½ eki okyh Hkwfe vkSj ml ij ds lHkh vf/kdkjksa dk vtZu djus ds vius vk’k; dh lwpuk nh Fkh;

vkSj l{ke izkf/kdkjh us mDr vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 8 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj dks viuh fjiksVZ ns nh gS(

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ekpZ 9] 2019@iQkYxqu 18] 1940

987

vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj dk iwoksZDr fjiksVZ ij fopkj djus ds i'pkr~ vkSj e/; izns’k ljdkj ls ijke’kZ djus ds i’pkr~

;g lek/kku gks x;k gS fd blls layXu vuqlwph esa of.kZr 427-993 gsDVj ¼yxHkx½ ;k 1057-57 ,dM+ ¼yxHkx½ eki okyh

Hkwfe ds vkSj mlds lHkh vf/kdkj vftZr fd, tkus pkfg,A

vr% vc dsUnzh; ljdkj mDr vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 9 dh mi/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk iznRr ’kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] ;g

?kks"k.kk djrh gS fd mDr vuqlwph esa ;Fkkof.kZr 427-993 gsDVj ¼yxHkx½ ;k 1057-57 ,dM+ ¼yxHkx½ eki okyh Hkwfe vkSj

mlds lHkh vf/kdkj vftZr fd, tkrs gSA

bl vf/klwpuk ds vUrxZr vkus okys {ks= ds js[kkad la[;k ,lbZlh,y@ch,lih@th,e@ ¼ih,yth½@ Hkwfe@524]

rkjh[k 19 fnlEcj] 2018 dk fujh{k.k dysDVj] ftyk vuqiiqj ¼e/; izns’k½ ds dk;kZy; esa ;k dks;yk fu;a=d]1] dkamfly

gkml LVªhV] dksydkrk & 700001 ds dk;kZy; esa ;k lkmFk bZLVuZ dksyQhYM~l fyfeVsM ¼jktLo vuqHkkx½] lhir jksM]

fcykliqj &495006 ¼NRrhlx<+½ ds dk;kZy; esa fd;k tk ldrk gSA

vuqlwph

f>fj;k if’pe vkslhih] glnso {ks=

ftyk&‘vuqiiqj] e/; izns’k

[ js[kkad la[;k ,lbZlh,y@ch,lih@th,e@¼ih,yth½@Hkwfe@524] rkjh[k 19 fnlEcj] 2018] lHkh vf/kdkj%

¼d½ jktLo Hkwfe%

Lkkj.kh

Øe

la-

xzke dk uke

iVokjh

gYdk la[;k

tujy

la[;k

rglhy

ftyk

{ks= gsDVj esa

fVIif.k;ka

¼1½

¼2½

¼3½

¼4½

¼5½

¼6½

¼7½

¼8½

HkyeqMh

225

dksrek

vuqiiqj

97-656

“kx

Qqydksuk

229

dksrek

vuqiiqj

9-820

“kx

cuxokW

224

dksrek

vuqiiqj

1-152

“kx

iMjhVksyk

222

dksrek

vuqiiqj

0-950

“kx

dqy % 109.578 gsDVj ¼yxHkx½ ;k 270.77 ,dM+ ¼yxHkx½

¼[k½ ou Hkwfe%

Lkkj.kh

Øe

la-

ou dk uke

dEikVZesaV la[;k

jsat

fMfotu

{ks= gsDVj esa

fVIif.k;ka

¼1½

¼2½

¼3½

¼4½

¼5½

¼6½

¼7½

eyxk vkjf{kr ou

496¼Hkkx½]

ih 498¼Hkkx½]

ih 494¼Hkkx½]

ih 488¼Hkkx½]

ih 492¼Hkkx½]

502 ¼Hkkx½

dksrek

vuqiiqj

318-415

“kx

dqy % 318.415 gsDVj ¼yxHkx½ ;k 786.80 ,dM+ ¼yxHkx½

dqy ;ksx ¼d$[k½% 427-993 gsDVj ¼yxHkx½

;k 1057-57 ,dM+ ¼yxHkx½

988

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 9, 2019/PHALGUNA 18, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

jktLo Hkwfe esa vftZr fd, x, IykV la[;kad%

xzke HkyeqMh ¼“kx½ esa vftZr fd, x, IykV la[;k% 5@1 ¼Hkkx½] 5@2 ¼Hkkx½] 6 ls 8] 9 ¼Hkkx½] 10 ls 12] 13 ¼Hkkx½] 18

¼Hkkx½] 20 ls 22] 23 ¼Hkkx½] 24 ls 28] 29 ¼Hkkx½] 56 ¼Hkkx½] 60 ¼Hkkx½] 61 ¼Hkkx½ ls 63 ¼Hkkx½] 73 ¼Hkkx½ ls 75 ¼Hkkx½] 76 ls

116] 117 ¼Hkkx½] 118] 119 ¼Hkkx½] 121 ¼Hkkx½] 122 ¼Hkkx½] 123 ls 132] 133 ¼Hkkx½] 136 ¼Hkkx½] 137 ls 148] 149 ¼Hkkx½] 150 ls

156-

xzke Qqydksuk ¼“kx½ esa vftZr fd, x, IykV la[;k% 1186 ¼Hkkx½] 1187 ¼Hkkx½] 1188 ¼Hkkx½] 1189 ¼Hkkx½] 1288 ¼Hkkx½]

1289 ls 1292] 1293 ¼Hkkx½] 1294 ¼Hkkx½ ls 1296 ¼Hkkx½] 1297-

xzke cuxokW ¼“kx½ esa vftZr fd, x, IykV la[;k% 154 ¼Hkkx½] 156 ¼Hkkx½] 157 ¼Hkkx½] 160 ¼Hkkx½] 161] 164 ¼Hkkx½] 175

¼Hkkx½] 176 ¼Hkkx½

xzke iMjhVksyk ¼“kx½ esa vftZr fd, x, IykV la[;k% 174 ¼Hkkx½

lhek o.kZu %

d&[k js[kk fcUnq **d** ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke MqejdNkj&cuxokW ds Hkkxr% lfEefyr lhek] IykV la[;k 176] 175]

xzke HkyeqMh&cuxokW ds Hkkxr% lfEefyr lhek ls gksrh gqbZ fcUnq **[k** ij feyrh gSA

[k&x

js[kk fcUnq **[k** ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke HkyeqMh ds IykV la[;k 136] 133] 117] 121]122] 119] 117] 73] 74]

75] 63] 29] 60@3] 62] 61] 60@1 ls gksrh gqbZ fcUnq **x** ij feyrh gSA

x&?k

js[kk fcUnq **x** ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke cuxokW ds IykV la[;k 156] 157] 160] 164] 154 ls gksdj xzke

iMjhVksyk esa izos’k dj IykV la[;k 174 ls xqtjrh gqbZ fcUnq **?k** ij feyrh gSA

?k&³

js[kk fcUnq **?k** ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke iMjhVksyk ds IykV la[;k 174 ls gksdj xzke cuxokW esa izos’k djrh gS

,oa IykV la[;k 154] 164] 160] 157] 156 ls gksdj xzke HkyeqMh esa izos’k djrh gS vkSj IykV la[;k 60@1] 56@2] 56@1]

60@1] 60@3] 29] 23] 5@2] 5@1] 9] 13] 18 ls gksrh gqbZ fcUnq **³** ij feyrh gSA

³&p

js[kk fcUnq **³** ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke Qqydksuk ds IykV la[;k 1186] 1187] 1188] 1189] 1288 ls gksrh gqbZ

fcUnq **p** ij feyrh gSA

p&N

js[kk fcUnq **p** ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke Qqydksuk ds IykV la[;k 1297 ds nf{k.kh lhek] 1296] 1295] 1294]

1292] 1293 ls gksrh gqbZ fcUnq **N** ij feyrh gSA

N&d

js[kk fcUnq **N** ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke MqejdNkj ds IykV la[;k 2] 1 ls xqtjrh gqbZ vkjafHkd fcUnq **d** ij

feyrh gSA

[Qk- la- 43015@41@2017 &,y, ,.M vkbZvkj]

jke f’kjksef.k ljkst] mi lfpo

MINISTRY OF COAL

New Delhi, the 5^th March, 2019

S.O. 322.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Coal number S.O. 6,

dated the 2^nd January, 2018, issued under sub-section (1) of section 7 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and

Development) Act. 1957 (20 of 1957) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) and published in the Gazette of India, Part

II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii), dated the 6^th January, 2018, the Central Government gave notice of its intention to acquire

427.993 hectares (approximately) or 1057.57 acres (approximately) of land and all rights in or over such land specified

in the Schedule appended to that notification;

And whereas the competent authority in pursuance of section 8 of the said Act has made his report to the

Central Government;

And whereas, the Central Government after considering the aforesaid report and after consulting the

Government of Madhya Pradesh, is satisfied that the land measuring 427.993 hectares (approximately) or 1057.57 acres

(approximately) and all rights in or over such land as described in the Schedule appended hereto, should be acquired.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ekpZ 9] 2019@iQkYxqu 18] 1940

989

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (1) of section 9 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby declares that the land measuring 427.993 hectares (approximately) or 1057.57 acres (approximately)

and all rights in or over such land as described in the said Schedule are hereby acquired.

The plan bearing number SECL/BSP/GM/(PLG)/LAND/524, date the 19^th December, 2018 of the area covered

by this notification may be inspected at the Office of the Collector, District Anuppur (Madhya Pradesh) or at the office

of the Coal Controller, 1, Council House Street, Kolkata – 700001 or at the Office of the South Eastern Coalfield

Limited (Revenue Section), Seepat Road, Bilaspur-495006 (Chhattisgarh).

SCHEDULE

Jhiria West OCP, Hasdeo Area

District Anuppur, Madhya Pradesh

[Plan bearing number SECL/BSP/GM/(PLG)/LAND/524, date the 19^th December, 2018 ]

All Rights:

(A) Revenue land:

TABLE

Sl.

No.

Name of village

General

number

Patwari

halka number

Tahsil

District

Area in

hectares

Remarks

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

Bhalmudi

225

Kotma

Anuppur

97.656

Part

Fulkona

229

Kotma

Anuppur

9.820

Part

Bangawan

224

Kotma

Anuppur

1.152

Part

Padritola

222

Kotma

Anuppur

0.950

Part

Total: - 109.578 hectares (approximately) or 270.77 acres (approximately).

(B) Forest land:

TABLE

Sl.

No.

Name of Forest

Compartment number

Range

Division

Area in

hectares

Remarks

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

Malga Reserve

Forest

496(Part), P498(Part),

P494(Part), 488(Part),

P492(Part), 502(Part)

Kotma

Anuppur

318.415

Part

Total: - 318.415 hectares (approximately) or 786.80 acres (approximately).

Grand Total (A+B): 427.993 hectares (approximately)

or 1057.57 acres(approximately)

Plot numbers acquired under revenue land:

1. Plot numbers acquired in village Bhalmudi (Part): 5/1(P), 5/2(P), 6 to 8, 9(P), 10 to 12, 13(P), 18(P), 20 to 22,

23(P), 24 to 28, 29(P), 56(P), 60(P), 61(P) to 63(P), 73(P) to 75(P), 76 to 116, 117(P), 118, 119(P), 121(P), 122(P),

123 to 132, 133(P), 136(P), 137 to 148, 149(P), 150 to 156.

2. Plot numbers acquired in village Fulkona (Part): 1186(P), 1187(P), 1188(P), 1189(P), 1288(P), 1289 to 1292,

1293(P), 1294(P) to 1296(P), 1297.

3. Plot numbers acquired in village Bangawa (Part): 154(P), 156(P), 157(P), 160(P), 161, 164(P), 175(P), 176(P).

4. Plot numbers acquired in village Padritola (Part): 174(P).

Boundary description:

A-B Line starts from point ‘A’ and passes along partly common boundary of villages Dumarkhchhar-Bangawan,

through plot number 176, 175, along partly common boundary of villages Bhalmudi-Bangawan and meets at point

‘B’.

990

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 9, 2019/PHALGUNA 18, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

B-C Line starts from point ‘B’ and passes in village Bhalmudi through plot number 136, 133, 117, 121, 122, 119,

117, 73, 74, 75, 63, 29, 60/3, 62, 61, 60/1 and meets at point ‘C’.

C-D Line starts from point ‘C’ and passes in village Bangawan through plot number 156, 157, 160, 164, 154 and

enter in village Padritola and passes through plot number 174 and meets at point ‘D’.

D-E Line starts from point ‘D’ and passes in village Padritola through plot number 174 then enter in village

Bangawan and passes through plot number 154, 164, 160, 157, 156 then enter in village Bhalmudi and passes through

plot number 60/1, 56/2, 56/1, 60/1, 60/3, 29, 23, 5/2, 5/1, 9, 13, 18 and meets at point ‘E’.

E-F Line starts from point ‘E’ and passes in village Fulkona through plot number 1186, 1187, 1188, 1189, 1288

and meets at point ‘F’.

F-G Line starts from point ‘F’ and passes in village Fulkona along southern boundary of plot number 1297, through

plot number 1296, 1295, 1294, 1292, 1293 and meets at point ‘G’.

G-A Line starts from point ‘G’ and passes in village Dumarkachhar through plot number 2, 1 and meets at starting

point ‘A’.

[ F. No. 43015/41/2017-LA&IR ]

RAM SHIROMANI SAROJ, Dy. Secy.

नई दली, 5 माच?, 2019

का

का. . . . आ. . . . 323

323

323.—के2 3ीय सरकार ने कोयला धारक ]े< (अज?न और िवकास) अिधिनयम, 1957 (1957 का 20)

(िजसे इसमA इसके प^ चात् उ\ त अिधिनयम कहा गया है ) क धारा 4 क उप-धारा (1) के अधीन भारत सरकार के कोयला

मं<ालय 'ारा जारी क गई अिधसूचना संV यांक का. आ. 1470, तारीख 11 अ+ूबर, 2018, जो भारत के राजप<, भाग II,

ख@ ड 3, उप-ख@ ड (ii), तारीख 13 अ+ूबर, 2018 मA (कािशत क गई थी, उ+ अिधसूचना से उपाब_ अनुसूची मA िविन`द?a ट

पIर]े< क भूिम मA िजसका माप 2.495 हे\ टेयर (लगभग) या 6.17 एकड़ (लगभग) है, कोयले का पूवc]ण करने के अपने

आशय क सूचना दी थी;

और, के2 3ीय सरकार का यह समाधान हो गया है क इस अिधसूचना से संलd न अनुसूची मA िविहत उ\ त भूिम के

भाग मA कोयला अिभ(ाe त है ।

अत:, अब, के2 3ीय सरकार उ\ त अिधिनयम क धारा 7 क उप-धारा (1) 'ारा (द= त शि\ तय, का (योग करते 0ए,

इससे संलd न अनुसूची मA वfणgत 2.495 हे\ टेयर (लगभग) या 6.17 एकड़ (लगभग) माप वाली भूिम मA या उस पर के सभी

अिधकार, का अज?न करने के अपने आशय क सूचना देती है ।

ट प

ट पण

ण

ण 1 :

1 :

1 : इस अिधसूचना के अधीन आने वाले ]े< के रेखांक संV यांक एमसीएल/केए/अिधसूचना/2018-19/1091,

तारीख 5 दसYबर, 2018 का िनरी]ण कले\ टर, िजला अंगुल, ओिडशा के काया?लय मA या कोयला िनयं<क, 1, काउंिसल

हाउस 8 iीट, कोलकाता - 700 001 के काया?लय मA या िनदेशक (ओपी), महानदी कोलफjस िलिमटेड, जागृित िवहार,

डाकघर बुला?, िजला सYबलपुर, ओिडशा के काया?लय मA कया जा सकता है ।

ट प

ट पण

ण

ण 2 :

2 :

2 : उ\ त अिधिनयम क धारा 8 के उपबंध, क ओर k यान आकृa ट कया जाता है, िजसमA अज?न के संबंध मA आपि)याँ,

िनmिलिखत उपबंध है:-

‘’8. (1) कोई n यि\ त जो कसी भूिम मA, िजसके संबंध मA धारा 7 के अधीन अिधसूचना िनकाली गई है, िहतब_ है,

अिधसूचना के जारी कए जाने से तीस दन के भीतर सY पूण? भूिम या उसके कसी भाग या ऐसी भूिम मA या उस पर

के क2 हp अिधकार, का अज?न कए जाने के बारे मA आपि= त कर सकेगा ।

प

प टी

टी

टीकरण

करण

करण.— इस धारा के अथा?2तग?त यह आपि= त नहp मानी जाएगी, क कोई n यि\ त कसी भूिम मA कोयला उ= पादन के

िलए 8 वयं खनन संqयाएं करना चाहता है और ऐसी संqयाएं के2 3ीय सरकार या कसी अ2 य n यि\ त को नहp करनी चािहए।

2. उप-धारा (1) के अधीन (= येक आपि= त स]म (ािधकारी को िलिखत मA क जाएगी और स]म (ािधकारी,

आपि= तकता? को 8 वयं सुने जाने या िविध n यवसायी 'ारा सुनवाई का अवसर देगा और ऐसी सभी आपि= तय, को

सुनने के प^ चात् और ऐसी अितIर\ त जांच, यद कोई हो, करने के प^ चात् जो वह आव^ यक समझता है, वह या तो

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ekpZ 9] 2019@iQkYxqu 18] 1940

991

धारा 7 क उप-धारा (1) के अधीन अिधसूिचत भूिम के या ऐसी भूिम मA या उस पर के अिधकार, के संबंध मA एक

Iरपोट? या ऐसी भूिम के िविभ2 न टुकड़, या ऐसी भूिम मA या उस पर के अिधकार, के संबंध मA आपि= तय, पर अपनी

िसफाIरश, और उसके 'ारा क गई काय?वाही के अिभलेख सिहत िविभ2 न Iरपोट? के2 3ीय सरकार को उसके

िविन^ चय के िलए देगा ।

3. इस धारा के (योजन, के िलए वह n यि\ त कसी भूिम मA िहतब_ समझा जाएगा जो (ितकर मA िहत का दावा करने

का हकदार हो, यद भूिम या ऐसी भूिम मA या उस पर के अिधकार इस अिधिनयम के अधीन अLज?त कर िलए जाते

ह।‘’

ट प

ट पण 3

ण 3

ण 3: : : : के2 3ीय सरकार ने कोयला िनयं<क, 1, काउंिसल हाउस 8 iीट, कोलकाता - 700 001 को उ\ त अिधिनयम क

धारा 3 के अधीन अिधसूचना संV यांक का. आ. 2015, तारीख 10 जुलाई, 1995, जो भारत के राजप<, भाग II, खंड 3,

उप-खंड (ii) मA तारीख 22 जुलाई,1995 को (कािशत क गयी थी, 'ारा स]म (ािधकारी िनयु\ त कया गया है ।

अनुसूची

किनहा कोल लॉक

िजला अंगुल

िजला अंगुल, , , , राय ओिडशा

राय ओिडशा

[ रेखांक संV यांक एमसीएल/केए/अिधसूचना/2018-19/1091, तारीख 5 दसYबर, 2018]

सभी अिधकार:

qम सं. ाम का नाम

ाम

संVया

पटवारी

हका

/जेएल

संVया

तहसील/

पुिलस

8टेशन

िजला

]े<

हे\टेयर मA

)

लगभग

(

]े<

एकड़ मA

(लगभग)

Iटeपिणयां

कंसामुंडा

136

किनहा

अंगुल

0.449

1.11

भाग

किनहा

131

किनहा

अंगुल

1.477

3.65

भाग

छेिलया

108

175

किनहा

अंगुल

0.032

0.08

भाग

पथरामुंडा

178

किनहा

अंगुल

0.473

1.17

भाग

तेलीNसंघा

177

किनहा

अंगुल

0.040

0.10

भाग

गुंडुरीनाली

159

किनहा

अंगुल

0.024

0.06

भाग

(1)

ाम

कंसामुंडा

मA

अLज?त

कए

जाने

वाले

eलाट

संVयांक:

4406/4905,1691/4893,1694/

4894,1913,1914,1915,1924,1925,1928,1933,1926,1927,1929,1932/4377,1930,1931,1932, 3970/ 4350,

4042/4966, 4042/4967.

(2) ाम किनहा मA अLज?त कए जाने वाले eलाट संVयांक: 1596, 926/1775, 1559/1687, 1597,1598,1599/1780,

910/1839,1006/1821,1006/1799,1006/1820,1638/1824,1638/1836,1639/1837,1638/1835,1638/183,

1638/1823,741/1825,741/1826,1595, 1599,1598/1691,1595/1745.

(3) ाम किनहा मA अLज?त कए जाने वाले eलाट संVयांक: 1231/1681.

(4) ाम पथरामुंडा मA अLज?त कए जाने वाले eलाट संVयांक: 1335, 228/3328, 120/3265, 120/3457.

(5) ाम तेलीNसंघा मA अLज?त कए जाने वाले eलाट संVयांक: 2051/2533.

(6) ाम गुंडुरीनाली मA अLज?त कए जाने वाले eलाट संVयांक: 1039/1707.

अLज?त कए जाने वाले भूिम का िववरण नीचे तािलका मA दया गया है:

992

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 9, 2019/PHALGUNA 18, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

अनुसूची

ाम

खाता

सं.

लाट

सं.

क म े

(एकड़

म)

अिभिलिखत

अिभधृित

(आरटी) का

नाम

आर.टी.

के

िपता

का

नाम

मोबाइल संया

टपिणयां

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

(9)

कंसामुंडा

252/

4406/

4905

टी/1

0.16

थबीर

च ा

!धान

घासीनाथ

!धान

9937293293

अिभधृित

भूिम

251

1691/

4893

एस/1

0.17

हादी,

झा%,

िब वाल

नीता

िब वाल

9778772929

-वही-

1694/

4894

एस/1

0.07

वही

1913

एस/2

0.01

ऊजल सा) और

साहेब,

खागा

सा)

पित

पंजई

सा)

और

सुपु

कथई

सा)

9861221444

वही

137

1914

एस/2

0.01

!दीप

कुमार

सा) और गुआ

सा)

हरमोहन

सा)

और

पित

िब0बाधर

सा)

9178275083

वही

221

1915

एस/2

0.02

रामा

च ा

वैन,

जडुनाथ वैन

बैझाली वैन

7894001308

वही

252/

357

1924

एस/2

0.03

बंसीधर

सा)

सुक% सा)

9861124768

वही

203

1925

एस/2

0.02

मदन िब वाल,

सनखली

और

अरािखता

िब वाल

मगुनी

िब वाल और

िभकरी

िब वाल

7008471951

वही

1928

एस/2

0.01

वही

1933

एस/2

0.09

वही

1926

एस/2

0.02

चखदी सा)

पित

ई5र

सा)

उपल7ध नह9

वही

1927

एस/2

0.01

वही

1929

एस/2

0.01

गोकुलच ा,

नरो:म, िबशा,

सुफाला बेहरा.

सानू बेहरा

7894225012

वही

1932/

4377

एस/2

0.01

वही

1930

एस/2

0.01

दया,

िबदेशी,

गो;बंदा

बेहरा

मधु

बेहरा

और महारगा

9668748908

वही

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ekpZ 9] 2019@iQkYxqu 18] 1940

993

और

नीलामिण,

पूणा=च ा,

दबाकर

बेहरा.

बेहरा

1931

एस/2

0.03

कुलमिण गांधी,

च ी, गु%बरी,

बुधई,

मांजरी

वैन

इकदुिसया

वैन

9437595554

वही

197

1932

एस/2

0.02

भागीरथी

ऊछाब,

खाऊदुनी वैन

सुरे ा वैन

9777144001

वही

204

3970/

4350

टी/2

0.20

मदन िब वाल

मगुनी

िब वाल

7008471951

वही

252/

4042/

4966

एस/1

0.12

महा!साद

!धान

नाबाघन

!धान

9778321191

वही

252/

4042/

4967

एस/1

0.08

भूबने5री

!धान

!ताप च ा

!धान

8763760151

वही

कुल: (ाम कंसामुंडा): 1.11 एकड़

किनहा

1596

एस/3

0.10 घाना बहेरा

हाडी बहेरा

उपल7ध नह9

अिभधृित

भूिम

926/

1775

टी/2

0.25 !ाणाबंधु,

पदमानव,

!हलाद

च ा

!धान

और

!ताप

च

!धान,

!बीन

कुमार !धान.

परमानंदा

!धान

और

नीला0बर

!धान

9439351218

वही

1559/

1687

टी/2

0.10 पीता0बर दे@रे

साहेब दे@रे

9861614575

वही

1597

एस/3

0.12

मऊदा

नायक

और िगरधारी,

दया,

रतना,

पंकज नायक

पAी – बसु

नायक और

सुपु

साना नायक

7873572110

वही

1598

एस/3

0.05

वही

1599/

1780

टी/2

0.13 वही

वही

108/6

910/

1839

जीबी

0.04

भूबने5री

!धान

!ताप च ा

!धान

8763760151

वही

994

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 9, 2019/PHALGUNA 18, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

108/8

1006/

1821

जीबी

0.22

थाबीर

च ा

सा)

भा कर सा)

9437486897

वही

108/9

1006/

1799

जीबी

0.22

नबाघान !धान

सुदश=न !धान

9778321191

वही

108/11

1006/

1820

जीबी

0.22 रमेश च

सा)

बाजी सा)

9861336041

वही

99/32

1638/

1824

एस/3

0.09 संजीब

कुमार

सा) और सुशील

कुमार सा)

बंसीधर सा)

और

िबDयाधर

सा)

8637252744

वही

1638/

1836

एस/3

0.04

वही

1639/

1837

एस/3

0.11

वही

99/28

1638/

1835

एस/3

0.200

चं ामिण

नायक,

गौरंग

चरन नायक

देबहारी

नायक

9437616041

वही

108/2

1638/

1833

जीबी

0.025

ि लोचन !धान चं मिण

!धान

7077951758

वही

99/24

1638/

1823

एस/3

0.025 नरेश च सा)

िनEयानंद

सा)

9437147296

वही

99/16

741/

1825

एस/1

0.300

पलऊ नायक

मदन नायक

7978172909

वही

99/17

741/

1826

एस/1

0.290

सं कार नायक

पलऊ नायक

7978172909

वही

कुल: 2.53 एकड़

106

1595

टी/2

0.15

अनाबदी

(सरकारी)

सरकारी

उपल7ध नह9

सरकारी

भूिम

1599

टी/2

0.85

वही

1598/

1691

एस/3

0.05

वही

1595/

1745

एस/3

0.07

वही

कुल: 1.12 एकड़

कुल (ाम किनहा): 2.53

कुल (ाम किनहा): 2.53 +1.12

1.12

1.12 =

= 3.65 एकड़ (का तकारी भूिम

3.65 एकड़ (का तकारी भूिम

3.65 एकड़ (का तकारी भूिम+सरकारी भूिम )

सरकारी भूिम )

छेिलया

146

1231/

1681

टी/2

0.08

हदीबंधु सा)

सट% सा)

9437234315

अिभधृित

भूिम

कुल: (ाम छेिलया): 0.08 एकड

पथरामुंडा

1335

एस/2

0.05

पानू,

क%णा,

मामी,

उतमा

भाजी सा)

9778417910

अिभधृित

भूिम

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ekpZ 9] 2019@iQkYxqu 18] 1940

995

सु%मा सा)

147

228/

3328

एस/2

0.04

सागर सा)

कFयाण सा)

7381320512

वही

120/

3265

टी/2

0.92

बीटा सा)

हादी सा)

9337976852

वही

166/19

120/

3457

जीबी

0.16

मोहन सा)

नकूल सा) ,

दबाकर

सा),

नीलादरी सा)

बीटा सा)

9337976852

वही

कुल: (ाम पथरामुंडा ): 1.17 एकड़

तेली;संघा

2051/

2533

एस/1

0.10

कुतरथा सा)

किपला सा)

9668649760

अिभधृित

भूिम

कुल: (ाम तेती*संघा ): 0.10 एकड़

गुंडुरीनाली

110

1039/

1707

पितता

0.06

सEयनारायण

गणनायक,

आशा दास,

दुिहता दास,

देई मोहंते,

केरा मोहंते और

दीबाकर

गणनायक,

जानकG ;संह

वैपनेH वर

गणनायक

और

अिधकारी

गणनायक

8763021600

अिभधृित

भूिम

कुल: (ाम गुंडुरीनाली ): 0.06 एकड़

कुल जोड़ : 6.17 एकड़

सीमा िववरण:

लॉक

लॉक- ‘क’ : : : :

ठ – ड : रेखा िब2दु '' ठ '' से (ारंभ होती है जो कंसामुंडा, किनहा ाम और गोहीराडंडा आर.एफ. के िमलन िब2दु

(ि<-जं\शन) पर ि8थत िपलर के पास ि8थत है । इसके बाद यह किनहा और कंसामुंडा ाम क सिYमिलत सीमा के साथ

चलती 0ई पूव? दशा जाती 0ई कंसामुंडा ाम क eलॉट संVया 1507,1508,1509,क उ)री सीमा होते 0ए कंसामुंडा ाम

क eलॉट संVया 1509 के उ)र-पूव? कोने तक जाती है । इसके पvात,रेखा किनहा ाम मA (वेश करती है और उ)र दशा मA

जाती 0ई eलॉट संVया 1777 के पिvम,उ)र एवं पूव? सीमा को छूती है । eलॉट संVया 966 क उ)री सीमा को भगतः से

छूती 0ई eलॉट संVया 981 के उ)री कोने तक जाती है । यही रेखा eलॉट संVया 980,979.1027 क उ)री सीमा, eलॉट

संVया 1026 क उ)र- पूव[ कोने क तरफ जाती 0ई eलॉट संVया 1026 के उ)र- पूव[ कोने तक जाती है । रेखा उ)र-पूव?

दशा मA eलॉट संVया 1021 क उ)र-पिvम सीमा के साथ जाती 0ई , eलॉट संVया 1020 क पिvमी और उ)र सीमा से

भागतः Mप से तथा eलॉट संVया 1008,1009,1146 क उ)री सीमा के साथ जरडा और किनहा ाम क पिvमी छोर तक

जाती है । इस ाम क सड़क को पार करने के बाद रेखा eलॉट संVया 1641 क उ)री सीमा के साथ किनहा और पथरमुंडा

ाम क सिYमिलत सीमा के साथ बढ़ती है । इसके बाद रेखा पथरमुंडा ाम मA (वेश करती है और eलॉट संVया 138 क

पिvमी सीमा के साथ भागतः दि]ण दशा मA जाती 0ई इसी eलॉट के दि]ण- पिvम कोने तक जाती है । इसके बाद eलॉट

संVया 138,3197 क दि]णी सीमा के साथ रेखा पूव? क तरफ जाती 0ई eलॉट संVया 3197 के दि]ण-पूव[ कोने तक

996

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 9, 2019/PHALGUNA 18, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

जाती है । यही रेखा उ)र- पूव? दशा मA जाती 0ई eलॉट संVया 142 क सीमा के साथ भागतः Mप से ,eलॉट संVया

175,176 क उ)री सीमा, eलॉट संVया 456,455,453 क दि]णी सीमा के साथ जाती 0ई eलॉट संVया 453 के दि]ण-

पूव? कोने तक जाती है । यह उ)र दशा क ओर मुड़ती 0ई eलॉट संVया 453 क पूव[ सीमा तक जाती 0ई eलॉट संVया 452

के उ)र-पिvम कोने तक जाती है । यह रेखा eलॉट संVया 564,565, 566,579,3218,584 एवं 586 क दि]णी सीमा के

साथ पूव? दशा मे जाती 0ई eलॉट संVया 586 के दि]ण – पूव? कोने तक जाते है । पुनः यह रेखा उ)र क ओर मुड़ती है और

इसी eलॉट क पूव[ सीमा तक होती 0ई eलॉट संVया 586 के उ)री कोने तक जाती है । यह पूव? दशा क ओर मुड़ती 0ई

eलॉट संVया 574,590 क दि]णी सीमा को आंिशक Mप तक जाती 0ई eलॉट संVया 590 के दि]ण-पूव? कोने तक जाती है ।

इसके पvात,रेखा दि]ण-पूव? दशा क और जाती 0ई eलॉट संVया 589,588 क पिvमी सीमा के साथ eलॉट संVया 587 क

दि]णी सीमा को भागतः होती 0ई eलॉट संVया 596,598,599 क दि]णी सीमा से होती 0ई िब2दु “ड” को छूती है जो

पथरमूडा और तेिलNसंघा सड़क के पिvमी क ओर ि8थत है ।

ड – ढ : रेखा “ड” से (ारंभ होती है और दि]ण दशा क ओर मुड़ती 0ई पथरमुंडा और तेिलNसंघा सड़क के पूव[ सीमा के

साथ दि]ण दशा क ओर बढ़ती 0ई eलॉट संVया 3166 के उ)री कोने तक जा कर िब2दु “ढ” पर िमलती है ।

ढ – ण : रेखा “ढ” से (ारंभ होकर, तेिलNसंघा और पथरमुंडा ाम सड़क को पार करने के पvात रेखा eलॉट संVया 355 क

पूव[ सीमा के साथ भागतः होकर दि]ण दशा क ओर मुड़ती है । इसके बाद eलॉट संVया 355 क दि]ण दशा क सीमा के

साथ चलती 0ई पिvम दशा क आर मुड़ती है और eलॉट संVया 3271 क पूव[ सीमा के साथ जाती 0ई दि]ण क तरफ

जाती है । इसके बाद यह इसी eलॉट क दि]णी सीमा के साथ पिvम क ओर जाती है और इसी eलॉट क पिvमी सीमा

के साथ उ)र क ओर मुड़ती है । यही रेखा eलॉट संVया 341 क पिvमी सीमा , eलॉट संVया 340 क पूव[ सीमा के साथ

भाग से,eलॉट संVया 337,336 क पूव[ सीमा,334 क पूव? और दि]णी सीमा,3234,3293 क दि]णी सीमा के साथ

पिvमी दशा क ओर बढ़कर eलॉट संVया 3293 क दि]ण-पिvम कोने से होते 0ई िब2दु “ण” पर िमलती है ।

ण-त : रेखा िब2दु “ण” से (ारYभ होकर eलॉट संVया 3293 क पिvम-उ)र सीमा के साथ चलती 0ई eलॉट संVया

327,326 क उ)री सीमा eलॉट संVया 325,324,323 क पिvमी सीमा ,eलॉट संVया 322,321 क दि]णी-पिvमी

सीमा,eलॉट संVया 3188,270,271,272 क दि]णी सीमा ,eलॉट संVया 284,286 क पूव[ सीमा ,eलॉट संVया 287,288

क उ)र-पूव? सीमा ,eलॉट संVया 2357 क उ)री पूव?-दि]णी सीमा ,eलॉट संVया 300,301 क पूव[ सीमा,eलॉट संVया

301 क दि]णी-पिvमी सीमा,eलॉट संVया 299,298,297,296,295,292,291,289 क पिvमी सीमा और eलॉट संVया

3263 क दि]णी तथा भागतः पिvमी सीमा,eलॉट संVया 3286 क दि]णी सीमा,eलॉट संVया 3286,3275 क पिvमी

सीमा ,eलॉट संVया 3191 क दि]णी-पिvमी सीमा से होकर जाती है । इसके बाद रेखा पिvम क और मुड़ती है और eलॉट

संVया 3196 क दि]णी सीमा ,eलॉट संVया 137 क दि]ण-पूव? सीमा के साथ चलती है । इसके बाद रेखा दि]ण दशा क

ओर जाती है और किनहा से जरडा तक जाने वाले ाम सड़क क पूव[ सीमा के साथ चलती 0ई eलॉट संVया 61 के उ)री

कोने तक जाती है । इसके बाद यह दि]ण दशा क ओर चलती 0ई eलॉट संVया 3266 क दि]ण-पिvम सीमा से होकर

eलॉट संVया 120 क भागतः दि]णी सीमा से होती 0ई िब2दु "त" तक जाती है ।

त – थ: रेखा िब2दु “त” से (ारंभ होती है जो पथरमुंडा ाम क eलॉट संVया 93 के उ)र-पूव[ कोने पर ि8तथ है और eलॉट

संVया 93,94 क पूव[ सीमा के साथ होती 0ई eलॉट संVया 105 के उ)र-पूव? और भागतः पिvमी सीमा,eलॉट संVया

106,119,118,116 क पूव[ सीमा से होकर जाती है तथा तेलीNसंघा और पथरमुंडा ाम क सिYमिलत सीमा के साथ

चलती है । यह रेखा बाई जं\शन िपलर को पार करने के बाद eलॉट संVया 3294 को आंिशक Mप से पार करती है । इसके

पvात,eलॉट संVया 3294 भागतः क उ)री सीमा होते 0ए बाई जं\शन िपलर को पार करने के पvात यह eलॉट संVया

3294 को भागतः साथ-साथ होती 0ई eलॉट संVया 3291 क उ)री और पूव[ सीमा के साथ चलती है । पुनः रेखा तेलीNसंघा

और पथरमुंडा ाम, क सिYमिलत सीमा के साथ चलती है । बाई –जं\शन िपलर को पार करने के पvात रेखा eलॉट संVया

322 क पिvमी सीमा तथा eलॉट संVया 319 क पूव[,उ)री तथा पिvमी सीमा के साथ चलती है । पुनः रेखा eलॉट संVया

322 क पूव[ सीमा के साथ-साथ उ2हp ाम, के सिYमिलत सीमा तक जाती है । रेखा ाम क सीमा के साथ पूव[ दशा क

ओर चलती 0ई िब2दु “थ” तक जाती है ।

थ-द: रेखा िब2दु “थ” से (ारंभ होती है जो तेलीNसंघा ाम क eलॉट संVया 710 के उ)र-पूव? कोने पर ि8थत है । तब, रेखा

eलॉट संVया 3123,3124,3128,3129,3144 क पिvमी सीमा के साथ होती 0ई eलॉट संVया 3145 क पिvमी और

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ekpZ 9] 2019@iQkYxqu 18] 1940

997

दि]णी सीमा,eलॉट संVया 3146,3147 क दि]णी सीमा,eलॉट संVया 3151 क पिvमी सीमा ,eलॉट संVया 3152 क

पिvम और दि]ण क ओर से तेलीNसंघा और पथरमुंडा ाम क सिYमिलत सीमा पर बाई-जं\शन िपलर तक प0ँचती है ।

इसके पvात रेखा तेलीNसंघा ाम मA (वेश करती है और eलॉट संVया 771 के दि]ण-पिvम मA िब2दु “द” तक जाती है ।

द- ध : रेखा िब2दु “द” से (ारंभ होती है जो eलॉट संVया 772 के उ)र-पिvम कोने और तेलीNसंघा रोड के उ)र-पिvम क

ओर ि8थत है । रेखा “द - ध” उ)र-पूव? दशा क ओर eलॉट संVया 771 क उ)र-पूव? तरफ से चलती 0ई िब2दु “ध” तक

जाती है ।

ध- न : रेखा िब2दु “ध” से (ारंभ होती है जो तेलीNसंघा,आYबपाल और बीजीगोल ाम, के ि<-जं\शन िपलर पर ि8थत है ।

तब रेखा तेलीNसंघा और बीजीगोल ाम क सिYमिलत सीमा के साथ चलती 0ई उ)र-पिvम दशा क और बढ़कर

तेलीNसंघा,लोधाबंध और बीजीगोल ाम, के ि< -जं\शन िपलर तक जाती है । पुनः यह रेखा उ)र दशा क ओर मुड़ती है

और पथरमुंडा और लोधाबंध ाम, क सिYमिलत सीमा से होती 0ई िब2दु “न” तक जाती है ।

न-प: रेखा िब2दु “न“ से (ारYभ होती है जो पथरामुंडा ाम क eलॉट संVया 2849 के उ)र- पूव[ कोने पर ि8थत है। फर

यह रेखा eलॉट संVया 2849, 2848, 2854 और 2855 क उ)री सीमा के साथ चलती है। इसके बाद यह उ)र-पूव? दशा

क ओर मुड़ती है और eलॉट संVया 2844 सड़क के पूव[ कनारे से होकर जाती है। इसके बाद यह eलॉट संVया 2737,

2736, 2739, 2741 और 2805 क पूव[ सीमा से होकर जाती है। यह रेखा eलॉट संVया 2805, 2801, 2800, 2790,

2791 क उ)री सीमा के साथ पिvम दशा क ओर चलती 0ई पथरमुंडा ब8ती मA (वेश करती है और eलॉट संVया 1821,

1818 क उ)री सीमा के साथ चलती है। इसके बाद eलॉट संVया 1813 क पिvमी सीमा, 1813 क उ)री सीमा, 1548

क पूव[ सीमा और 1548, 1547, 1546, 1545 क उ)री सीमा से होकर गुजरती और दि]ण दशा क ओर eलॉट संVया

1545 क पिvमी सीमा के साथ चलती है। पुनः यह पिvम दशा क ओर eलॉट संVया 1560 के उ)र-पिvम कोने और

3256, 1526, 1541 क उ)री सीमा के साथ मुड़ती है। पुनः यह दि]ण दशा क ओर eलॉट संVया 1540 क पूव[ सीमा

और 1539, 1537, 1533 क उ)री सीमा के साथ मुड़ती है। इसके पvात, यह दि]ण दशा क ओर मुड़ती 0ई eलॉट संVया

1533 क पिvमी सीमा और 1534 क भागतः सीमा के साथ चलती है। इसके बाद यह रेखा उ)र दशा क ओर मुड़ती है

तथा 1525 के पूव[ कनारे के साथ 1526, 1522, 1514 क उ)री सीमा और 1513 के भाग के साथ चलती है। इसके

पvात, यह 1295 क पूव[ सीमा 1295 क उ)री सीमा, 1295 क आंिशक पिvमी सीमा से होकर गुजरती है। पुनः यह

eलॉट संVया 3250 क उ)री सीमा को पार करती है एवं 1354 क सीमा को आंिशक छूती है। इसके बाद रेखा उ)री दशा

क ओर eलॉट संVया 1353, 1323, 1322 के पूव[ कनारे के साथ चलती है। इसके बाद यह eलॉट संVया 1322 क उ)री

सीमा, eलॉट संVया 1320 क उ)र-पूव?, eलॉट संVया 1319 क उ)री सीमा, eलॉट संVया 1319 क भागतः पिvमी सीमा,

eलॉट संVया 1316, 1315 क उ)री सीमा से होकर जाती 0ई गाँव क सड़क को छूती है। इस सड़क को पार करने के बाद

रेखा eलॉट संVया 603, 602 क दि]णी सीमा, eलॉट संVया 602 क पिvमी, eलॉट संVया 515 क पूव?-उ)र सीमा से

होकर गुजरती है। पुनः यह eलॉट संVया 517 क भागतः पिvम, eलॉट संVया 518 क दि]ण, eलॉट संVया 519 क भागतः

पूव?, eलॉट संVया 519 क दि]ण, eलॉट संVया 519 क पिvम से होकर गुजरती है। इसके पvात, यह eलॉट संVया 521,

522, 523 क दि]ण-पिvम से होकर गुजरती है। पुनः यह रेखा eलॉट संVया 523 क पिvम, eलॉट संVया 523 के उ)र से

होकर गुजरती है। इसके पvात, यह eलॉट संVया 524 क उ)री सीमा, eलॉट संVया 525 के पूव?, eलॉट संVया 525, 526 के

उ)र, eलॉट संVया 527 के पूव?, eलॉट संVया 3242, 530 के उ)र, eलॉट संVया 530 के पिvम से होकर गुजरती है। इसके

पvात eलॉट संVया 534 के उ)र, eलॉट संVया 535 के पूव?, eलॉट संVया 535, 468 के उ)र से होकर गुजरती है। इसके

पvात, यह रेखा eलॉट संVया 3341 के भागतः पूव[ भाग, eलॉट संVया 3341 के उ)र, eलॉट संVया 3341 के पिvम, eलॉट

संVया 3225 के दि]ण के साथ उ)र क ओर मुड़ती है। इसके पvात, यह रेखा किनहा और पथरमुंडा क सिYमिलत सीमा को

छूती है और उ)र क ओर मुड़ती है तथा उसी गाँव क सीमा के साथ बढ़ती 0ई किनहा ब8ती के बाई-जं\शन िपलर तक जाती

है । फर, यह रेखा किनहा ब8ती क दि]ण सीमा साथ बढ़ती 0ई किनहा-जरडा ाम सड़क eलॉट संVया 1148 के िब2दु “प”

को छूती है।

प-फ: रेखा िब2दु “प” से (ारंभ होती है और उ)र दशा क ओर मुड़ती है, किनहा ब8ती सीमा के पिvमी कनारे के साथ

आगे बढ़ते 0ए eलॉट संVया 627 के पूव[ कोने तक जाती है जो िब2दु “फ” है।

998

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 9, 2019/PHALGUNA 18, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

फ-ब: रेखा िब2दु “फ” से (ारंभ होती है और eलॉट संVया 627, 625, 624 और 623 क उतरी सीमा से होकर गुजरती है,

फर यह eलॉट संVया 635, 636 क पिvमी सीमा, eलॉट संVया 638, 640, 641, 642, 644,646, 647,क उ)री सीमा

तथा 648 से भागतः गुजरती है। इसके पvात, यह eलॉट सं.648, 650, 651, 653, 654, 1650 क पिvमी सीमा, eलॉट

संVया 742 क उ)री सीमा, eलॉट संVया 743 क उ)री-पूव[, eलॉट संVया 750, 751 के आंिशक उ)र, eलॉट संVया 752

के पूव?, eलॉट संVया 752 के उ)र, eलॉट संVया 772 के आंिशक पिvम से होती 0ई पुनः यह रेखा eलॉट संVया 753, 754,

755, 770, 771, 772, 773 क उ)री सीमा, eलॉट संVया 773, 768 क पिvमी सीमा और 1784 क आंिशक उ)र-

पिvम सीमा से होकर गुजरती है। इसके पvात, यह eलॉट सं॰ 777 के उ)र eलॉट संVया 777 के पिvम eलॉट संVया 779 के

उ)र से होकर गुजरती है। इसके पvात यह रेखा पिvम दशा क ओर मुड़कर eलॉट संVया 792, 858, 857 क उ)री

सीमा और eलॉट संVया 857 के भागतः पिvम, eलॉट संVया 839 के उ)र, eलॉट संVया 839 के पिvमी कनारे के साथ

चलती है। इसके पvात, यह eलॉट संVया 856 क भागतः पिvमी सीमा, eलॉट संVया 852, 856 के पिvम, eलॉट संVया

856 उ)र-पिvमी सीमा के साथ गुजरती है। इसके पvात, यह रेखा पूव? दशा क ओर मुड़कर eलॉट संVया 856 क पिvम

सीमा, eलॉट संVया 865, 866 क दि]णी सीमा संVया eलॉट संVया 869 क पिvमी सीमा, eलॉट संVया 868 क दि]णी

सीमा के साथ चलती है। इसके पvात, ये रेखा दि]णी दशा क ओर मुड़कर eलॉट संVया 869 क भागतः पिvमी सीमा के

साथ चलती 0ई सड़क के उ)री कनारे तक प0ँचती है और पिvम दशा क ओर मुड़ती है और इसी सड़क के उ)री कनारे के

साथ बढ़ती 0ई गोिहरादंडा आर.एफ. और किनहा गाँव के बाई - जं\शन िपलर के िब2दु ”ब” तक जाती है।

ब-ठ: पुनः यह रेखा दि]णी दशा क ओर किनहा ाम और गोिहरादंडा आर.एफ. क सिYमिलत सीमा के साथ चलती 0ई

इस गाँव के बाई जं\शन िपलर क छूती है तथा िब2दु “ठ” पर िमलती है।

लॉक

लॉक – ‘ख’ : : : :

ट-ञ: रेखा िब2दु “ट” से (ारंभ होती है जो जयपुर और कंसामुंडा ाम क सिYमिलत सीमा और eलॉट संVया 280 तथा 4003

क सिYमिलत सीमा पर ि8थत है। फर, यह पिvम दशा क ओर उसी सिYमिलत ाम सीमा के साथ बढ़ती 0ई कंसामुंडा

ाम क eलॉट संVया 3894 के दि]ण-पिvम कोने के िब2दु “ञ” को छूती है।

ञ-झ: रेखा िब2दु “ञ” से (ारंभ होती है जो उ)र दशा क ओर मुड़ जाती है। रेखा कंसामुंडा गाँव मA (वेश करती है और eलॉट

संVया 3894, 3886, 3885, 3881 3880, 3879, 3874 क पिvमी सीमा को छूती 0ई नाला तक जाती है, इसके पvात,

यह दि]ण-पिvम दशा क ओर मुड़ती है और उसी नाले के दि]णी कनारे के साथ आगे बढ़ती है इसके पvात, यह उ)र

दशा क ओर मुड़ती है और eलॉट संVया 3915, 3928, 3688, 4510, 4511, 4512 क पिvमी सीमा के साथ चलती 0ई

eलॉट संVया 3615 के दि]ण-पिvम कोने तक प0ँचती है, इसके पvात यह रेखा उ)र-पिvम दशा क ओर मुड़ती और

eलॉट संVया 4515 क पिvमी सीमा से होकर गुजरती है, इसके पvात यह उ)र दशा क ओर मुड़ती है और सड़क पार

करती 0ई eलॉट संVया 1959 क पिvमी सीमा के साथ आगे बदती 0ई eलॉट संVया 1959 के उ)र-पिvम कोने तक जाती

है, इसके पvात, यही रेखा पूव? दशा क ओर मुड़ती है और eलॉट संVया 1959 क उ)री सीमा से होकर गुजरती 0ई eलॉट

संVया 1957 के पिvमी कोने तक जाती है। पुनः यह रेखा उ)र-पूव? दशा क ओर मुड़ती है और eलॉट संVया 1957, 1962,

1963, 1887, 1828 क पिvमी सीमा के साथ चलती 0ई कंसामुंडा गाँव क सड़क को छूती है। पुनः यह रेखा दि]ण-पिvम

दशा क ओर मुड़ती है और इसी सड़क के दि]णी कनारे के साथ आगे बढ़ती है, इसके पvात, यह रेखा उ)र दशा क ओर

मुड़ती है और इसी सड़क को पर करती है और सड़क क छोर तक जाती है, इसके पvात यह रेखा पूव? क ओर मुड़ती है ओर

eलॉट संVया 1827 के उ)री कनारे से होकर गुजरती है, इसके पvात, यह उ)र दशा क ओर मुड़ती है और eलॉट संVया

1823, 1824 के पिvमी कनारे से होती 0ई िब2दु “झ” तक प0ँचती है जो eलॉट संVया 1824 तथा 1814 क साझा उ)र-

पिvम सीमा पर ि8थत है।

झ-ज: रेखा िब2दु “झ” से (ारंभ होती है और पूव? क तरफ चलते 0ए eलॉट संVया 1817 के दि]ण-पूव? कोने तक जाती है।

पुनः यह उ)र दशा मA मुड़ती है और eलॉट संVया 1817 क पूव[ सीमा के साथ चलती 0ई eलॉट संVया 1818 तक प0ँचती

है। पुनः यह रेखा पूव? क ओर eलॉट संVया 1822, 1821 क पूव[ सीमा के साथ चलती 0ई eलॉट संVया 1785 के दि]ण-पूव?

कोने तक जाती है। इसके पvात, रेखा उ)र दशा क ओर मुड़ती है और eलॉट संVया 1782 क पिvम सीमा से होकर

गुजरती 0ई eलॉट संVया 1782 के उ)र-पिvम कोने तक जाती है। पुनः यह पूव? दशा क ओर मुड़ती है और eलॉट संVया

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ekpZ 9] 2019@iQkYxqu 18] 1940

999

1782, 1781, 1780 के उ)री कनारे से होकर गुजरती है और इसके पvात, यह उ)र दशा क ओर मुड़ती है और 1777

क भागतः पिvमी सीमा के साथ चलती 0ई eलॉट संVया 1777 के उ)र-पिvम कोने तक जाती है पुनः यह रेखा उ)र-पूव?

दशा क ओर मुड़ती और eलॉट संVया 1777, 4698, 1775, 4701, 1773 क उ)र सीमा के साथ चलती 0ई यह दि]ण

दशा क ओर मुड़ती है और eलॉट संVया 1773 क पूव[ सीमा के साथ चलती 0ई िब2दु “ज” पर प0ँचती है।

ज-ट: रेखा िब2दु-“ज” से (ारंभ होती है और दि]ण दशा क ओर मुड़कर eलॉट संVया 4708 क पिvम सीमा के साथ चलती

0ई कंसामुंडा ाम सड़क को छूती है। इसके पvात, यह eलॉट संVया 1759 क भागतः उ)री सीमा से और eलॉट संVया

1759 से होकर गुजरती है। इसके पvात यह eलॉट संVया 1682 और 1757 क उ)री तथा भागतः पिvमी सीमा के साथ,

eलॉट संVया 1751 क उ)री और पिvमी सीमा, eलॉट संVया 1752 क भागतः पिvमी सीमा, eलॉट संVया 1754 क

उ)री तथा पिvमी सीमा, eलॉट संVया 1741 क उ)री सीमा, eलॉट संVया 1740 क उ)री और भागतः पिvमी सीमा,

eलॉट संVया 1737 क उ)री और पिvमी सीमा, eलॉट संVया 1706 क भागतः पिvमी सीमा, eलॉट संVया 4412 क

उ)री तथा पिvमी सीमा, eलॉट संVया 1707 क पिvमी सीमा, eलॉट संVया 1713 क भागतः उ)री सीमा, eलॉट संVया

1726 क उ)री और पिvमी सीमा, eलॉट संVया 1721 क भागतः उ)री तथा पिvमी सीमा, eलॉट संVया 4577 क

पिvमी सीमा, eलॉट संVया 4839 क उ)री और पिvमी सीमा, eलॉट संVया 1974 क भागतः उ)री सीमा और eलॉट

संVया 1974 से होकर गुजरती है। इसके पvात, यह eलॉट संVया 4060 क उ)री और भागतः पिvमी सीमा के साथ, eलॉट

संVया 3962 क भागतः उ)री सीमा के साथ गुजरती है। eलॉट संVया 3963 क पूव[-उ)री और पिvमी सीमा, eलॉट संVया

3962 क भागतः पिvमी सीमा, eलॉट संVया 4615 क पिvमी सीमा तथा eलॉट संVया 4615 तथा 4055 क आंिशक

पिvमी सीमा, eलॉट संVया 4047 एवं 4046 क उ)री सीमा, eलॉट संVया 4045 क उ)री, पिvमी और दि]णी सीमा

तथा eलॉट संVया 4050 क आंिशक पिvमी सीमा, इसके पvात, रेखा eलॉट संVया 4038 क उ)री और पिvमी सीमा के

साथ eलॉट संVया 4036 क भागतः पिvमी सीमा, eलॉट संVया 4024, 4026 क उ)री और पिvमी सीमा, eलॉट संVया

4017, 4013, 4011, 4005 और 4004 क पिvमी सीमा से चलती 0ई कंसामुंडा तथा जयपुर गाँव क सिYमिलत सीमा के

िब2दु “ट” पर िमलती है।

लॉक

लॉक- ‘ग’ :

क-ख: रेखा िब2दु-“क” से (ारंभ होती है जो जमािनया, अदैता(साद और मालापसी ाम, के ि<- जं\शन िपलर पर ि8थत है

और दि]ण क तरफ मुड़कर मालापसी तथा जमािनया गांव, क सिYमिलत सीमा के साथ आगे बढ़ती है। इसके पvात यह

रेखा गुंडुIरनाली, जमािनया और मालापसी ि<-जं\शन िपलर को छूती है। यही रेखा दि]ण-पूव? दशा क ओर गुंडुIरनाली

और जमािनया गांव, क सिYमिलत सीमा के साथ चलती 0ई जमािनया गाँव क eलॉट संVया 399 क पिvमी सीमा को छूती

है। इसके पvात, यह eलॉट संVया 485 क उ)र-पिvम सीमा से होकर गुंडुIरनाली गाँव मA (वेश करती है। इसके पvात यह

दि]ण-पूव? दशा क ओर इसी eलॉट क सीमा के साथ मुड़ती है। इस िब2दु को छूने के पvात यह eलॉट संVया 486 क

दि]णी-पिvमी सीमा क तरफ मुड़ती है। पुनः यह इस eलॉट क सीमा के साथ दि]ण-पूव? दशा क ओर मुड़ती 0ई बढ़ती है।

इसके पvात, यह रेखा दि]ण-पिvम क ओर चलती है और eलॉट संVया 973 क पिvमी सीमा तथा 972 क उ)री सीमा

के साथ आगे बढ़ती 0ई दि]ण दशा क ओर eलॉट संVया 972, 1064, 1066, 1068 और 1070 क पिvमी सीमा के साथ

आगे बढ़ती है। पुनः यह पूव? दशा क ओर मुड़ती है और eलॉट संVया 1070 क दि]णी सीमा से होकर गुजरती है। इसके

पvात, यह रेखा दि]णी सीमा से होकर गुजरती है। इसके पvात, यह रेखा दि]ण क तरफ मुड़ती है और eलॉट संVया 1074

और 1075 क पिvमी सीमा से गुजरती है। पुनः यह रेखा दि]ण-पूव? दशा क ओर मुड़ती है और eलॉट संVया 1075 और

1838 क दि]णी सीमा के साथ आगे बढ़ती है। eलॉट संVया 1838 और 1059 के साझा िब2दु को 8पश? करने के बाद यह पूव?

क ओर मुड़कर eलॉट संVया 1059 क दि]णी सीमा के साथ आगे बढ़ती 0ई गाँव क सड़क को छूती है। इसके पvात पुनः

यह दि]ण दशा क ओर मुड़ती है और इसी सड़क के पिvमी कनारे के साथ होती 0ई उसी सड़क के अंितम िब2दु तक जाती

है और पूव? क तरफ मुड़ती है तथा इसक चौड़ाई से होकर गुजरती है। यह रेखा उ)र- पिvम दशा क ओर इसी सड़क के

पूव[ कनारे के साथ आगे बढ़ती 0ई eलॉट संVया 1796 के उ)र-पिvम कोने तक प0ँचती है। इसके पvात यह पूव? दशा क

ओर मुड़कर eलॉट संVया 1795 क दि]णी सीमा के साथ बढ़ती 0ई eलॉट संVया 1795 और 1796 के पूव? के सिYमिलत

िब2दु तक जाती है। पुनः यह दि]ण दशा क ओर मुड़ती है और eलॉट संVया 1796 और 1797 क पूव[ सीमा के साथ आगे

बढ़ती है तथा इसके पvात यह पिvम दशा क ओर मुड़कर eलॉट संVया 1797 और 1798 क पूव[ सिYमिलत सीमा तक

जाती है। इसके पvात यह दि]ण दशा क ओर बढ़ती है और eलॉट संVया 1798 के पूव[ कनारे के साथ आगे बढ़ती है और

1000

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 9, 2019/PHALGUNA 18, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

यह पिvम दशा क ओर मुड़कर इसी eलॉट क दि]णी सीमा के साथ eलॉट संVया 1798 और 1800 के साझा िब2दु तक

जाती है। पुनः यह दि]ण क ओर मुड़ती है और eलॉट संVया 1800 क भागतः पूव[ सीमा के साथ बढ़ती 0ई िब2दु-“ख” तक

जाती है।

ख-ग : रेखा िब2दु-“ख” से (ारंभ होती है जो गुंडुIरनाली ाम के eलॉट संVया 1054 के दि]ण-पिvम कनारे के सिYमिलत

िब2दु पर ि8थत है। इसके पvात रेखा eलॉट संVया 1054 क दि]णी सीमा से होकर गुजरती 0ई गुंडुIरनाली और छेिलया

गांव, क सिYमिलत सीमा तक प0ँचती है और छेिलया गाँव क eलॉट संVया 1826 क दि]णी सीमा से छेिलया गाँव मA (वेश

करती है। इसके पvात यह उ)र दशा क ओर मुड़ती 0ई इसी eलॉट क पूव[ सीमा के साथ बढ़ती 0ई eलॉट संVया 1708

और 1826 के सिYमिलत िब2दु तक जाती है। इसके पvात, यह eलॉट संVया 1708, 1620 और 21 क दि]णी सीमा से होती

0ई 21 और 46 के सिYमिलत िब2दु तक जाती है। पुनः यह दि]ण दशा क ओर मुड़कर eलॉट संVया 46, 47 के पिvमीम

कनारे और 47 के दि]णी छोर के साथ चलती 0ई eलॉट संVया 47 और 48 के सिYमिलत िब2दु तक जाती है। इसके पvात

यह दि]ण दशा क ओर मुड़ती है और eलॉट संVया 61, 65, 64 और 74 क दि]णी सीमा के साथ चलती 0ई eलॉट संVया

74 तथा 75 के सिYमिलत िब2दु तक जाती है। पुनः यह रेखा पूव? दशा क ओर मुड़ती है और eलॉट संVया 74 क दि]णी

सीमा के साथ चलती 0ई दि]ण-पूव? दशा क ओर मुड़कर eलॉट संVया 1769 के पिvमी कनारे के साथ चलती 0ई पुनः यह

उ)र-पूव? दशा क ओर आगे बढ़ती है और eलॉट संVया 1769 क दि]णी सीमा के साथ आगे बढ़ती 0ई eलॉट संVया 139 के

दि]णी कनारे तक जाती है। पुनः यह दि]ण-पूव? दशा क ओर मुड़ती है और eलॉट संVया 139, 137 के दि]णी कनारे के

साथ बढ़ती 0ई eलॉट संVया 135 के (ारंिभक िब2दु तक जाती है। eलॉट संVया 137 क चौड़ाई को पर करने के बाद रेखा

उ)र-पिvम दशा क eलॉट संVया 137 के भागतः पूव[ छोर के साथ मुड़ती है और eलॉट संVया 137 तथा 248 के

सिYमिलत िब2दु को छूती है। पुनः यह उ)र दशा क मुड़ती है और eलॉट संVया 248 के पूव[ कनारे के साथ चलती eलॉट

संVया 274 तक प0ँचती है। पुनः यह रेखा दि]ण-पूव? दशा क ओर मुड़ती है और eलॉट संVया 274, 1690, 276, 1662,

1473, 590, 545 तथा 543 क दि]णी सीमा के साथ आगे बढ़ती है और eलॉट संVया 543 के दि]णी कोने को छूती है।

पुनः यह उ)र-पूव? दशा क ओर मुड़ती है और eलॉट संVया 488 क पिvमी सीमा के साथ आगे बढ़ती है तथा पूव? दशा क

ओर eलॉट संVया 542, 541, 501, 502, 504, 480, 441, 436, 420, 421, 422 क दि]णी सीमा के साथ आगे बढ़ती

0ई छेिलया ाम सड़क तक जाती है। पुनः यही रेखा उ)र दशा क ओर मुड़ती है और इसी सड़क के आंिशक पिvमी कनारे

के साथ आगे बढ़ती 0ई eलॉट संVया 995 और सड़क के सिYमिलत िब2दु तक जाती है। इसके पvात यह पूव? दशा क ओर

मुड़ती है और eलॉट संVया 1199 के दि]णी कोने तक जाती है। पुनः यह दि]णी दशा क ओर मुड़ती है और eलॉट संVया

1199, 1200 तथा 1483 के पिvमी कनारे से होकर गुजरती 0ई eलॉट संVया 1483 के दि]ण-पिvम कोने तक जाती है।

पुनः यह पूव? दशा क ओर मुड़ती है और 1483, 1484, 1201, 1202, 1203 के दि]णी कनारे से होकर गुजरती है तथा

eलॉट संVया 1363, 1207, 1364, 1681 क दि]णी सीमा और 1485, 1232, 1233, 1530, 1531, 1697, 1696,

1695, 1694, 1693, 1470, 1678, 1687, 1186 तथा 1184 के भागतः पूव? से होकर गुजरती है और पुनः यह दि]ण-

पूव? दशा क ओर मुड़ती है और eलॉट संVया 1318, 1319, 1320, 1321, 1322 तथा 1327 के पूव[ कनारे के साथ बढ़ती

0ई िब2दु- “ग” तक जाती है जो छेिलया, कथारमुंडा और बड़ि<िवड़ा के ि<- जं\शन िपलर पर ि8थत है।

ग-घ : रेखा िब2दु – “ ग” से (ारंभ होती है और eलॉट संVया 1171 के पूव[ कनारे के साथ उ)र दशा क ओर बढ़ती है जो

छेिलया और कहारमुंडा ाम क सिYमिलत सीमा है यह eलॉट संVया 1170 के पूव[ कोने तक जाती है। पुनः यह रेखा उ)र-

पूव? क ओर मुड़ती है और उसी सिYमिलत ाम सीमा से होकर गुजरती 0ई छेिलया, कहारमुंडा और कमरेई ाम, के ि<-

जं\शन िपलर तक जाती है। इसके पvात यह रेखा उ)र दशा क तरफ छेिलया और मथारगड़ी आर एफ़ से होकर जाती है।

पुनः यह उसी दशा मA छेिलया ाम और मथारगड़ी आर एफ़ क सिYमिलत सीमा के साथ बढ़ती 0ई िब2दु-“घ” को छूती है जो

कमरेई और मथारगड़ी आर एफ़ क सिYमिलत सीमा के घुमावदार िब2दु पर ि8थत है।

घ – ङ : िब2दु “घ” से रेखा (ारंभ होती और कमरेई और मथारगड़ी आर.एफ़. क सिYमिलत सीमा क पूव? दशा क ओर

बढ़ती 0ई िब2दु “ङ “ तक जाती है जो उसी आर. एफ़. क पूव[ सीमा का सिYमिलत िब2दु है ।

ङ -च : रेखा िब2दु “ङ “ से (ारंभ होती 0ई उ)र-पिvम दशा क ओर मुड़ती है और कमरेई ाम और मथारगड़ी आर एफ़

क सिYमिलत सीमा के साथ आगे बढ़ती 0ई कमरेई ाम क eलॉट संVया 2550 के पिvमी कोने तक जाती है और पुनः यह

उ)र-पूव? दशा क ओर मुड़ती है और कमरेई और दादाNसंघा ाम क सिYमिलत सीमा से होकर गुजरती 0ई तेलीNसंघा,

कमरेई और दादाNसंघा के iाई जं\सन िपलर को पार करती 0ई तेलीNसंघा और दादाNसंघा के बाई जं\सन िपलर तक जाती है।

पुनः यह रेखा उ)र दशा क ओर मुड़ती है और दादाNसंघा एवं तेलीNसंघा ाम क सिYमिलत सीमा से होती 0ई तेलीNसंघा

और आYबपाल एवं दादाNसंघा ाम, के iाई जं\सन िपलर तक जाती है। पुनः यह उसी दशा मA तेलीNसंघा और आYबपाल

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ekpZ 9] 2019@iQkYxqu 18] 1940

1001

ाम, क सिYमिलत सीमा के साथ बढ़ती 0ई िब2दु “च” तक जाती है जो उसी सिYमिलत सीमा तथा तेलीNसंघा ाम, क

eलॉट संVया 2594 के उ)र-पूव[ कोने पर ि8थत है।

च – छ : रेखा िब2दु “च” से (ारंभ होकर तेलीNसंघा ाम क eलॉट संVया 2594 क उ)री सीमा के साथ पिvम क ओर

आगे बढ़ती है पुनः दि]ण दशा क ओर मुड़ती है और इसी eलॉट क भागतः पिvम सीमा के साथ आगे बढ़ती है। इसके

पvात, यह eलॉट संVया 817, 816, 815 और 813 क उ)री सीमा के साथ पिvम दशा क ओर आगे बढ़ती 0ई eलॉट

संVया 813 के उ)र पिvम कोने तक जाती है। इसके पvात यह eलॉट संVया 813 और 814 क पिvमी सीमा के साथ

दि]ण दशा क ओर चलती है। eलॉट संVया 814 के दि]ण-पिvम कोने पर प0ँचने के पvात पुनः यह पिvम दशा क ओर

मुड़ जाती है और eलॉट संVया 837, 840 तथा 841 क उ)री सीमा के साथ आगे बढ़ती है। पुनः यह दि]ण दशा क ओर

मुड़ जाती है और eलॉट संVया 840 क पिvमी सीमा के साथ बढ़ती है। इसके पvात यह eलॉट संVया 844, 868, 869 और

870 क उ)री सीमा के साथ उ)र-पिvम दशा क ओर मुड़ जाती है। इसके पvात यह eलॉट संVया 870, 871, 874 876

और 880 क उ)री सीमा के साथ दि]ण-पिvम मA मुड़ जाती है और eलॉट संVया 880 के दि]ण-पिvम कोने तक जाती है।

पुनः यह पिvम दशा क ओर मुड़ती है और eलॉट संVया 881 क आंिशक उ)री सीमा के साथ चलती 0ई तेलीNसंघा ाम क

सड़क के पूव[ कनारे तक जाती है। पुनः यह दि]ण-पिvम दशा क ओर मुड़ती है और इसी ाम सड़क के पूव[ कनारे के

साथ eलॉट संVया 2019 तक जाती है। पुनः यह रेखा दि]ण-पिvम दशा क ओर मुड़ती है और eलॉट संVया 2019, 2018,

2082, 2085 तथा 2087 क पिvमी सीमा के साथ चलती 0ई eलॉट संVया 2085 के दि]ण-पिvम कोने को छूती है। पुनः

यह रेखा दि]ण-पूव? दशा क ओर आगे बढ़ती है और 2085 क दि]णी सीमा के साथ चलती 0ई eलॉट संVया 2085 के

दि]ण कोने तक जाती है। पुनः यह मुड़ती है और eलॉट संVया 2087 क पिvमी सीमा से होकर गुजरती 0ई eलॉट संVया

2087 तथा 2208 क सिYमिलत सीमा िब2दु को छूती है। पुनः यह पिvम दशा क ओर मुड़ती है और eलॉट संVया 1912

क भागतः दि]णी सीमा से होकर गुजरती 0ई eलॉट संVया 1877 तथा 2208 के उ)र साझा सीमा िब2दु को छूती है। पुनः

यह दि]ण दशा क ओर मुड़ती है और eलॉट संVया 1877 क पूव[ सीमा के साथ बढ़ती 0ई eलॉट संVया 1877 क दि]ण-

पूव? सीमा को छूती है। पुनः यह पूव? दशा क ओर मुड़ती है और eलॉट संVया 2631 क उ)री सीमा के साथ बढ़ती 0ई eलॉट

संVया 2631 तथा 2207 के सिYमिलत िब2दु तक जाती है। पुनः यह दि]ण दशा क ओर मुड़ती है और eलॉट संVया 2211

के पूव[ कनारे तथा eलॉट संVया 2218 क पिvमी सीमा के साथ बढ़ती 0ई सड़क तक जाती है। तेलीNसंघा ाम सड़क को

पार करने के बाद रेखा दि]ण दशा क ओर मुड़ती है और eलॉट संVया 2255 क पूव[ सीमा के साथ चलती 0ई िब2दु “छ”

तक प0ँचती है जो eलॉट संVया 2255, 2254 तथा 2257 के सिYमिलत िब2दु पर ि8थत है।

छ – क : रेखा िब2दु – “छ” से (ारंभ होती है। तेलीNसंघा क ाम सड़क को पार करने के बाद रेखा पिvम दशा क ओर eलॉट

संVया 2259 के उ)री कनारे के साथ चलती 0ई इसी eलॉट क उ)र-पिvम कोने तक प0ँचती है। इसके पvात यह दि]ण-

पिvम दशा क ओर मुड़ती है तथा इसी eलॉट क भागतः पिvमी सीमा के साथ चलती है। इसके पvात यह रेखा पिvम

दशा क ओर मुड़कर eलॉट संVया 2266 क उ)री सीमा के साथ चलती 0ई eलॉट संVया 2269 को छूती है। इसके पvात

यह दि]ण दशा क ओर मुड़ती है और eलॉट संVया 2266 क पिvमी सीमा के साथ चलती 0ई eलॉट संVया 2269 के

दि]ण-पूव? कोने तक प0ँचती है। यह eलॉट संVया 2269, 2270, 2271 एवं 1583 क दि]णी सीमा के साथ चलती 0ई

पिvम क तरफ मुड़ती है और eलाट संVया 1580 के उ)र-पूव? कोने तक जाती है । रेखा दि]ण-पिvम दशा क और मुड़ती

0ई eलाट संVया 1580 और 1581 क पूव[ सीमा के साथ चलती 0ई eलाट संVया 1581 के दि]ण-पूव? कोने तक प0ँचती है ।

इसके पvात यह पिvम दशा क और मुड़ती है और eलाट संVया 1582, 1575, 1576, 1574। 1570 क उ)री सीमा के

साथ चलती 0ई सड़क तक प0ँचती है । पुनः यह दि]ण दशा क और मुड़ती है औए इसी सड़क के पिvमी कनारे के साथ

चलती 0ई eलाट संVया 1562 के दि]णी कोने तक प0ँचती है । पुनः यह पिvम दशा क और मुड़ती है और eलाट संVया

1533, 1534, 1535, 1481, 1498 तथा 1497 क उ)री सीमा के साथ चलती 0ई तेिलNसंघा और जरडा ाम, क

सिYमिलत सीमा को छूती है। पुनः यह उसी दशा मA आगे बने के बाद जरडा ाम क eलाट संVया 3785, 3777, 3775,

3774, 3767, 3768 क उ)री सीमा के साथ जरडा ाम मA (वेश करती है । इसके बाद यह eलाट संVया 3768 क भागतः

पिvमी सीमा के साथ चलती 0ई दि]ण दशा क और मुड़ती है तथा eलाट संVया 3768 और 3751 क सिYमिलत सीमा

िब2दु तक जाती है । पुनः यह पिvम दशा क और चलती है और eलाट संVया 3751, 3754 तथा 3969 क उ)री सीमा के

साथ चलती 0ई तालाब के पूव[ कनारे को छूती है । इसके पvात, यह उ)र दशा क और मुड़ती है और eलाट संVया 3748

(तालाब के तटबंध) क भागतः पूव[ सीमा के साथ चलती 0ई eलाट के उ)र-पूव? कोने तक जाती है । पुनः यह रेखा पिvम क

तरफ मुड़ती है और eलाट संVया 3747 (तालाब) क उ)री सीमा के साथ चलती 0ई eलाट संVया 3746 के उ)र-पिvम कोने

तक प0ँचती है । इसके पvात, यही रेखा दि]ण दशा क और मुड़ती 0ई इसी eलाट क भागतः पिvमी सीमा को पार करती

0ई eलाट संVया 3968 के उ)र-पूव? कोने तक जाती है । पुनः यक पिvम दशा क और मुड़ती है और जरडा ब8ती क दि]ण

1002

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 9, 2019/PHALGUNA 18, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

सीमा के साथ चलती 0ई eलाट संVया 3313 के उ)र-पूव? कोने तक प0ँचती है । यह रेखा पिvम क ओर मुड़ती है और eलाट

संVया 3313, 3311, 3309 तथा 3307 क उ)री सीमा के साथ चलती 0ई eलाट संVया 3306 के उ)र-पिvम कोने तक

प0ँचती है पुनः यह रेखा उ)र-पिvम दशा क और मुड़ती है और eलाट संVया 3304, 3302, 3283, 3282, 3272 तथा

3271 क पिvम सीमा के साथ आगे बढ़ती है । पुनः यह रेखा eलाट संVया 1709 क उ)री सीमा, eलाट संVया 1709 क

उ)री सीमा, eलाट संVया 1631 क पूव[ eलाट संVया 1632, 1633, 1635, 1625, 1622, 1621, 1645, 1646, 1649,

1650, 1604, 1600, 1601, 1681, 1682 तथा 1683 के साथ पिvम दशा क और मुड़ती 0ई ज़रदा और जमािनया

ाम क सिYमिलत सीमा तक सीमा तक जाती है । इसके पvात रेखा उ)र दशा क और मुड़ती है और उसी ाम क सीमा

के साथ जमािनया ाम के उ)र-पूव? कोने क eलाट संVया 303, 302, 301, 300, 299 क उ)री सीमा के साथ आगे बढ़ती

है । पुनः यह रेखा eलाट संVया 298 क पूव[ सीमा के साथ उ)र दशा क तरफ मुड़ती है इसके पvात यह पिvम दशा मA

मुड़ती है और eलाट संVया 298, 297, 509, 286, 283, 588 क उ)री सीमा के साथ आगे बढ़ती 0ई eलाट संVया 587

तक जाती है । इसके पvात यह रेखा उ)र दशा क और मुड़ती है और eलाट संVया 276 क भागतः पिvमी सीमा के साथ

चलती 0ई eलाट संVया 238 तथा 276 के सिYमिलत कोने तक जाित है। इसके पvात यही रेखा उ)र पिvम दशा क और

मुड़ती है और eलाट संVया 238 क उ)री सीमा के साथ आगे बढ़ती है । इसके पvात यह वत?मान जमािनया ाम सड़क को

पार करती है और इसी ाम सड़क के दि]ण कनारे के साथ आगे बढ़ती 0ई eलाट संVया 60 तक जाती है । इसके पvात यह

दि]ण दशा क और मुड़ती है और eलाट संVया 60 क पिvमी सीमा के साथ आगे बढ़ती है और eलाट संVया 59,57,531

क दि]णी सीमा के साथ आगे बढ़ती है । इसके पvात यही रेखा उ)र दशा क और मुड़ती है और 591 क भागतः पिvमी

सीमा के साथ आगे बढ़ती है । इसके पvात यह पिvम दशा के और मुड़ती है और eलाट संVया 51 क दि]णी कनारे से

होकर गुजरती है । पुनः यह उसी eलाट क सीमा के साथ उ)र दशा क और मुड़ती है इसके बाद यह पिvमी दशा क और

मुड़ती है और eलाट संVया 53 क उ)री सीमा के साथ आगे बढ़ती 0ई eलाट संVया 50 तथा 53 क सिYमिलत कोने तक

जाती है । पुनः यह दि]ण दशा क और eलाट संVया 49 के पूव[ कनारे के साथ मुड़ती है और eलॉट संVया 49 के दि]ण-पूव?

कोने तक जाती है । पुनः पिvमी दशा क और मुड़ती है और eलॉट संVया 49,48,43 तथा 42 क दि]णी सीमा के साथ आगे

बढ़ती 0ई eलॉट संVया 42 के दि]ण-पिvम कोने तक जाती है । पुनः यह रेखा उ)र दशा क और मुड़ती है तथा eलाट संVया

37 क पूव[ सीमा िब2दु के साथ होती 0ई eलॉट संVया 37 के उ)र पूव[ कोने तक जाती है । इसके पvात यह पिvम दशा

क ओर मुड़ती है और eलॉट संVया 41,40,7,39 क दि]णी सीमा के साथ आगे बढ़ती है । यही रेखा eलॉट संVया 39 क

दि]णी सीमा, eलॉट संVया 29 क भागतः पूव[ , eलॉट संVया 29 क दि]णी eलॉट संVया 29 क भागतः पिvमी, eलॉट

संVया 27 क दि]णी, eलॉट संVया 27 क भागतः पिvमी, eलॉट संVया 26,25 क दि]णी, eलॉट संVया 25 क पिvमी

सीमा के साथ चलती 0ई सड़क के कनारे को छूती है और पिvमी दशा क ओर मुड़ती है और इसी सड़क के दि]णी कनारे

से होती 0ई िब2दु "क" पर समाƒ होती है ।

[ फा. सं. 43015/12/2018-एलए ए@ड आईआर]

राम िशरोमिण सरोज, उप सिचव

New Delhi, the 5^th March, 2019

S.O. 323.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Coal number S.O. 1470,

dated the 11^th October, 2018 issued under sub-section (1) of section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and

Development) Act,1957 (20 of 1957) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) and published in the Gazette of India,

Part II, section-3, Sub-section (ii), dated the 13^th October,2018, the Central Government gave notice of its intention to

prospect for coal in 2.495 hectares (approximately) or 6.17 acres (approximately) of the lands in the locality specified in

the Schedule annexed to the said notification;

And whereas, the Central Government is satisfied that coal is obtainable in a part of the said lands described in the

Schedule appended to this notification.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 7 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby gives notice of its intention to acquire the land measuring 2.495 hectares (approximately) or 6.17

acres (approximately) and all rights in or over the said lands described in the Schedule appended hereto.

Note 1: The plan bearing number MCL/KA/Notification/2018-19/1091, dated the 5^th December, 2018 of the area

covered by this notification may be inspected in the office of the Collector, District Angul, Odisha or in the office of the

Coal Controller,1, Council House Street, Kolkata -700001 or in the office of the Director Technical (OP), Mahanadi

Coalfields Limited, Jagriti Vihar, Post office Burla, District Sambalpur, Odisha.

Note 2: Attention is hereby invited to the provisions of section 8 of the said Act which provides for objection to

acquisition, as follows:-

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ekpZ 9] 2019@iQkYxqu 18] 1940

1003

“ 8. (1) Any person interested in any land in respect of which a notification under section 7 has been issued

may, within thirty days of the issue of the notification, object to the acquisition of the whole or any part of the

land or any rights in or over such land.

Explanation.- It shall not be an objection within the meaning of this section for any person to say that he himself desires

to undertake mining operation in the land for the production of coal and that such operations should not be undertaken

by the Central Government or by any other person.

(2) Every objection under sub-section(1) shall be made to the competent authority in writing, and the competent

authority shall give the objector an opportunity of being heard either in person or by a legal practitioner and shall, after

hearing all such objections and after making such further inquiry, if any, as he thinks necessary, either make a report in

respect of the land which has been notified under sub-section(1) of section 7 or of rights in or over such land, or make

different reports in respect of different parcels of such land or of rights in or over such land, to the Central Government,

containing his recommendations on the objections, together with the record of the proceedings held by him, for the

decision of that Government.

(3) For the purposes of this section, a person shall be deemed to be interested in land who would be entitled to claim

an interest in compensation if the land or any rights in or over such land were acquired under this Act.”

Note 3: The Coal Controller, 1, Council House Street, Kolkata - 700 001 has been appointed by the Central

Government as the competent authority under section 3 of the said Act, vide notification number S. O. 2015, dated the

10^th July, 1995, published in Part II, section 3, Sub-section (ii), of the Gazette of India, dated the 22^nd July, 1995.

SCHEDULE

Kaniha Coal Block

District- Angul, State- Odisha

[Plan bearing number MCL/KA/Notification/2018-19/1091, dated the 5^th December, 2018]

All Rights:

Sl.

No.

Name of

village

Village

Number

Patwari

halka/JL

number

Tehsil/

District

Area in

hectares

(approxi-

mately)

Area in

acres

(approxi-

mately)

Remarks

Kansamunda

136

Kaniha

Angul

0.449

1.11

Part

Kaniha

131

Kaniha

Angul

1.477

3.65

Part

Chhelia

108

175

Kaniha

Angul

0.032

0.08

Part

Patharmunda

178

Kaniha

Angul

0.473

1.17

Part

Telisingha

177

Kaniha

Angul

0.040

0.10

Part

Gundurinali

159

Kaniha

Angul

0.024

0.06

Part

Total : 2.495 hectares(approximately)

or 6.17 acres(approximately)

1. Plot numbers to be acquired in Village Kansamunda : 4406/4905, 1691/4893, 1694/4894, 1913, 1914, 1915, 1924,

1925, 1928, 1933, 1926, 1927, 1929, 1932/4377, 1930, 1931, 1932, 3970/4350, 4042/4966, 4042/4967.

2. Plot numbers to be acquired in Village Kaniha : 1596, 926/1775, 1559/1687, 1597, 1598, 1599/1780, 910/1839,

1006/1821, 1006/1799, 1006/1820, 1638/1824, 1638/1836, 1639/1837, 1638/1835, 1638/1833, 1638/1823, 741/1825,

741/1826, 1595, 1599, 1598/1691, 1595/1745.

3. Plot numbers to be acquired in Village Chhelia : 1231/1681.

4. Plot numbers to be acquired in Village Patharrmunda : 1335,228/3328,120/3265,120/3457.

5. Plot numbers to be acquired in Village Telisingha : 2051/2533.

6. Plot numbers to be acquired in Village Gundurinali : 1039/1707.

Details of land to be acquired are given in the table below :

1004

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 9, 2019/PHALGUNA 18, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

TABLE

Village

Khata No.

Plot No.

Kissam

Area

(in Ac)

Name of the

Recorded

Tenant(RT)

Fathers name

of the RT

Mobile No.

Remarks

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

(9)

Kansamunda

252/

4406/4905

T/1

0.16

Thabir

Chandra

Pradhan

Ghasinath

Pradhan

9937293293

Tenancy

Land

251

1691/4893

S/1

0.17

Hadi, Jharu, Biswal

Nita Biswal

9778772929

-do-

1694/4894

S/1

0.07

-do-

1913

S/2

0.01

Ujal

Sahoo

and

Saheb, Khaga Sahoo

W/o-Panjia

Sahoo

and

S/o-Kathia

sahoo

9861221444

137

1914

S/2

0.01

Pradip Kumar Sahoo

and Gua Sahoo

Harmohan

Sahoo

and

W/o-

Bimbadhar

Sahoo

9178275083

- do-

221

1915

S/2

0.02

Rama

chandra

Swain,Jadunath

Swain

Baijhali Swain

7894001308

- do-

252/

357

1924

S/2

0.03

Bansidhar Sahoo

Sukru Sahoo

9861124768

-do-

203

1925

S/2

0.02

Madan

Biswal,and

Sankhali,

Arakhita

Biswal

Maguni Biswal

and Bhikari

Biswal

7008471951

- do-

1928

S/2

0.01

- do-

1933

S/2

0.09

- do-

1926

S/2

0.02

Chakhandi Sahoo

W/o-Iswar

Sahoo

Not

available

- do-

1927

S/2

0.01

- do-

1929

S/2

0.01

GokulaChandra,

Narottam,Bisha,

Suphala Behera

Sanu Behera

7894225012

- do-

1932/4377

S/2

0.02

- do-

1930

S/2

0.01

Daya,Bideshi,

Gobinda Behera,and

Nilamani,Purnachand

ra,Dibakar Behera

Madhu Behera

and Maharga

behera

9668748908

- do-

1931

S/2

0.03

Kulamani,Gandhi,Ch

andri,Gurubari,Budhe

i,Manjari Swain

Ekadusia

Swain

9437595554

- do-

197

1932

S/2

0.02

Bhagirathi, Uchhab,

Khauduni,Swain

Surendra

Swain

9777144001

- do-

204

3970/4350

T/2

0.20

Madan Biswal

Maguni Biswal

7008471951

- do-

252/73

4042/4966

S/1

0.12

Mahaprasad Pradhan

Nabaghan

Pradhan

9778321191

- do-

252/74

4042/4967

S/1

0.08

Bhubaneswari

Pradhan

Pratap Chandra

Pradhan

8763760151

- do-

Total ( Village Kansamunda): 1.11 acres

Kaniha

1596

S/3

0.10

Ghana Behera

Hadi Behera

Not available

Tenancy

Land

926/1775

T/2

0.25

Pranabandhu.Padman

av,Prahallad Chandra

Pradhan and Pratap

Chandra

Pradhan,

Paramananda

Pradhan

and

Nilambar

9439351218

- do-

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ekpZ 9] 2019@iQkYxqu 18] 1940

1005

Prabin

Kumar

pradhan

Pradhan

1559/167

T/2

0.10

Pitambar Dehury

Saheb Dehury

9861614575

- do-

1597

S/3

0.12

Mauda Naik and

Giridhari,Daya,

Ratna,Pankaj Naik

W/o-Basu

Naik

and

S/o-

Sana

Naik

7873572110

- do-

1598

S/3

0.05

- do-

1599/180

T/2

0.13

- do

108/6

910/1839

0.04

Bhubaneswari

Pradhan

Pratap

Chandra

Pradhan

8763760151

-do-

108/8

1006/1821

0.22

Thabir

Chandra

Sahoo

Bhaskar

Sahoo

9437486897

- do-

108/9

1006/1799

0.22

Nabaghan Pradhan

Sudarsan

Pradhan

9778321191

- do-

108/11

1006/1820

0.22

Ramesh Chandra

Sahoo

Baji Sahoo

9861336041

- do-

99/32

1638/1824

S/3

0.09

Sanjib Kumar Sahoo

and Susil Kumar

Sahoo

Bansidhar

Sahoo

and

Bidyadhar

Sahoo

8637252744

- do-

1638/1836

S/3

0.04

- do-

1639/1837

S/3

0.11

- do-

99/28

1638/1835

S/3

0.200

Chandramani

Naik,Gourang

Charan Naik

Debahari

Naik

9437616041

- do-

108/2

1638/1833

0.025

Trilochan Pradhan

Chandramani

Pradhan

7077951758

- do-

99/24

1638/1823

S/3

0.025

Naresh

Chandra

Sahoo

Nityananda

Sahoo

9437147296

- do-

99/16

741/1825

S/1

0.300

Palau Naik

Madan Naik

7978172909

- do-

99/17

741/1826

S/1

0.290

Sankar Naik

Palau Naik

7978172909

- do-

Total : 2.53 acres

106

1595

T/2

0.15

Anabadi (Govt)

Govt.

Not

available

Govt. Land

1599

T/2

0.85

- do-

1598/1691

S/3

0.05

- do-

1595/1745

S/3

0.07

- do-

Total : 1.12 acres

Total (village Kaniha): 2.53 + 1.12 = 3.65 ( Tenancy land + Govt. Land)

Chhelia

146

1231/1681

T/2

0.08

Hadibandhu Sahoo

Satru Sahoo

943723

4315

Tenancy

Land

Total (Village Chhelia) : 0.08 acres

Patharmunda

1335

S/2

0.05

Panu,Karuna,

Mami,

Utama, Surama Sahoo

Bhaji Sahoo

977841

7910

Tenancy

Land

147

228/3328

S/2

0.04

Sagar Sahoo

Kalyan Sahoo

738132

0512

- do-

120/3265

T/2

0.92

Bita Sahoo

Hadi Sahoo

933797

6852

- do-

166/

120/3457

0.16

Mohan Sahoo, Nakula

Sahoo, Dibakar Sahoo,

Niladri Sahoo

Bita Sahoo

933797

6852

- do-

Total (Village Patharmunda) : 1.17 acres

1006

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 9, 2019/PHALGUNA 18, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Telisingha

2051/2533

S/1

0.10

Kutartha Sahoo

Kapila Sahoo

966864

9760

Tenancy

Land

Total (Village Telisingha) : 0.10 acres

Gundurinali

110

1039/1707

Patita

0.06

Satyanarayan

Garnayak,

Asha

Das,Duhita Das, Dei

Mohanty,

Kera

Mohanty and Dibakar

Garnayak, Janaki Singh

Swapneswar

Garnayak and

Adhikari

Garnayak

876302

1600

Tenancy

Land

Total: (Village Gundurinali) 0.06 acres

Grant Total : 6.17 acres

Boundary Description:

BLOCK- ‘A’ :

L-M: The line starts from Point ‘L’ which is situated at tri-junction Pillar of village Kansamunda, Kaniha and

Gohiradanda R.F. Then it moves towards east direction along common village boundary of Kaniha and Kansamunda

northern boundary of plot no. 1507,1508,1509 of village Kansamunda up to north east corner of plot no- 1509 of

Kansamunda. Then the line enters to village Kaniha and moves towards north direction and covers the west, north and

east boundary of plot no.1777, the partly northern boundary of plot no. 966 up to north corner of plot no-981. The same

line proceeds northern boundary of plot no. 980, 979, 1027, north and east boundary of plot no. 1026 up to northeast

corner point of plot no-1026. The line moves towards northeast direction along north and west boundary of plot no.

1021. Partly western and northern boundary of 1020, north boundary of plot no. 1008,1009,1146 up to west edge of

Jarada and Kaniha village road. After crossing the same village road the line moves along north boundary of plot

no.1641, up to common village boundary of Kaniha and Patharmunda. Then the line enter into village Patharmunda and

moves south direction along partly western boundary of plot no. 138 up to southwest corner of same plot. Then the line

proceeds towards east along south boundary of plot no. 138,3197up to southeast corner of plot no. 3197. The same line

moves towards north east direction covering the partly boundary of plot no.142, northern boundary of plot no.175, 176,

southern boundary of plot no. 456,455,453, up to southeast corner of plot no.453. It turns towards north directions

covering the east boundary of plot no. 453 up to northwest corner of plot no. 452. The same lines moves towards east

direction covering the southern boundary of plot no. 564,565,566,579,3218,584 and 586 up to southeast corner of plot

no.586. Again the line turns towards north directions covering eastern boundary of the same plot up to north corner of

plot no. 586. It moves towards east direction along partly southern boundary of plot no. 574,590 up to southeast corner

of plot no-590. Then the lines move towards south east direction along west boundary of plot no. 589,588 partly south

boundary of plot no. 587 south boundary of plot no. 596,598,599 up to touch point ‘M’ which is situated at the west side

of Patharmunda and Telisingha road.

M-N: The line start from ‘M’ and moves towards south direction along eastern boundary of Patharmunda and

Telisingha road up to north corner of plot no. 3166 to meet point ‘N’.

N-O: The lines start from ‘N’ after crossing the Telisingha and Patharmunda village road the lines moves south

directions along partly east boundary of plot no. 355 then it moves towards west direction along south side boundary of

plot no. 355 and turns towards south along east boundary of plot no. 3171 then it moves towards west along south

boundary of same plot and turns north along western boundary of same plot. The same line moves towards west direction

covering west boundary of plot no. 341 , partly east boundary of plot no. 340 east boundary of 337,336, east and south

boundary of 334 south boundary of 3234,3293 up to southwest corner of plot no. 3293 to meet at point ‘O’.

O-P: The lines starts from point ‘O’ moves along west and north boundary of plot no. 3293, north boundary of

327,326, west boundary of 325,324,323, south west boundary of 322,321 south boundary of 3188,270,271,272, east

boundary of 284,286,, north east of 287, 288 , north, east south boundary 3257, east of 300,301, south, west of 301 west

boundary of 299, 298, 297, 296, 295, 292, 291, 289 and south partly western boundary of 3263 southern boundary of

3286 and western boundary of 3286,3275, south and west boundary of 3191. Then the lines turn towards west and passes

along southern boundary of 3196 south eastern boundary of 137. Then the line moves south directions and proceeds

along eastern boundary of village road of Kaniha to Jarada up to north corner of plot no. 61. Then it moves towards south

directions covering the south west boundary of plot no. 3266 partly south boundary of plot no. 120 up to point ‘P’ .

P-Q : The line start from ‘P’ which is situated at northeast corner of plot no. 93 of village Patharmunda and moves along

eastern boundary of plot no. 93,94, north east and partly west boundary of plot no. 105, eastern boundary of plot no.

106, 119, 118, 116 and touches the common village boundary of Telisingha and Patharmunda and proceeds along it.

After crossing the bi-junction pillar the lines covers partly the plot no. 3294 and it moves partly northern boundary of

plot no.3294, northern and eastern boundary of 3291. Again the line moves along common village the boundary of

Telisingha and Patharmunda. After crossing the bi-junction pillar the lines moves western boundary of plot no. 322 and

eastern northern and western boundary of plot no. 319. Again the line moves along eastern boundary of plot no. 322 up

to same common village boundary. The line moves towards east direction along same village boundary up to point ‘Q’.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ekpZ 9] 2019@iQkYxqu 18] 1940

1007

Q-R: The line start from ‘Q’ which is situated at north east corner plot no.710 of village Telisingha. Then the line

moves along western boundary of plot no. 3123, 3124, 3128, 3129, 3144, western and southern boundary of 3145,

southern boundary of 3146, 3147 western boundary of 3151, west and south side of 3152 up to common village

boundary of Telisingha and Patharmunda at a bi-junction pillar. Then the lines enters into Telisingha village covering the

southwest of plot no.771 up to point ‘R’ .

R-S: The lines start from point ‘R’ which is situated at northwest corner of plot no.772 and also northwest side of

Telisingha road. The line RS moves towards northeast directions along northeast side of plot no. 771 up to point ‘S’.

S-T: The line starts from point ‘S’ which is situated at the tri-junction pillar of village Telisingha, Ambapal and Bijigol.

Then the line passes towards northwest direction along the common village boundary of Telisingha and Bijigol up to tri-

junction pillar village Telisingha, Lodhabandha and Bijigol. Again the same line turns towards north direction and passes

along common village boundary of Patharmunda and Lodhabandha up to point ‘T’.

T-U: The line starts from point ‘T’ which is situated at northeast corner of plot no.2849 of village Patharmunda. Again

the line proceeds along north boundary of plot no. 2849, 2848, 2854 and 2855. Then it turns towards northeast direction

and passes through east side of road plot no. 2844. Then it cross the east side boundary of plot no. 2737, 2736, 2739,

2741 and 2805 and turns the same line towards east direction along the north boundary of plot no. 2805, 2801, 2800,

2790, 2791 and enters to Patharmunda Basti and proceeds along north edge of plot no. 1821,1818 then passes through

west part of boundary of plot no. 1813, north boundary of 1813, east boundary of 1548, and then north boundary of

1548, 1547,1546,1545 and turns towards south direction along the west boundary of plot no. 1545. Again it turns

towards west direction along the northwest corner of 1560, north edge of 3256, 1562, 1541; again it turns towards south

direction along east boundary of 1540and north boundary of 1539, 1537, 1533. Then it turns towards south direction

along west boundary of plot no. 1533 and part of 1534. Then the same line turns towards north direction and proceeds

along east side of 1525, north boundary of 1526, 1522, 1514 and part of 1513. Then it passes through east boundary of

1295, north boundary of 1295, part west of 1295again it cross the north boundary of plot no. 3250 and touches the part

boundary of 1354. Then the line turns towards north direction along the east edge of plot no. 1353, 1323, and 1322. Then

it passes through the north boundary of plot no.1322 northeast of 1320, north of 1319, part west boundary of 1319 north

boundary of 1317, 1316, 1315 up to touch the village road. After crossing the same road the line passes through the

south boundary of plot no.603, 602, west of 602, east and north of 515. Again it passes through the part west boundary of

plot no. 517, south of 518, part east of 519, south of plot 519, west of 519. Then it passes along southwest of 521, 522,

523. Again the line cross through west of 523 north of 523 then it passes through north edge of plot no. 524 east of 525

north of 525, 526 east of 527 north of 3242, 530 west of 530 then it passes north of 534 east of 535 north of 535,468.

Then it turns towards north along part east boundary of 3341 north of 3341 west of 3341 south of 3225. Then the same

line touches the common village boundary of Kaniha and Patharmunda and terms towards north direction and proceeds

along same village boundary up to bi-junction pillar of Kaniha Basti. Then the line passes along the south edge boundary

of Kaniha Basti up to touch the Kaniha Jarada village road plot no. 1148 up to point ‘U’.

U-V: The line starts from point ‘U’ and turns towards north directions proceeds along the west side of Kaniha Basti

boundary up to east corner point of plot no. 627 that is point ‘V’.

V-W: The line starts from point ‘V’ and it passes through the north boundary of plot no.627, 625, 624 and 623, then it

passes west boundary of plot no. 635, 636, north boundary of 638, 640, 641, 642, 644, 646, 647, part of 648. Then passes

west boundary of 648, 650, 651, 653, 654, 1650, north boundary of 742, northeast of 743 partly north of 750, 751, east of

752, north of 752, partly west 752 again the same line passes through north boundary of 753, 754, 755, 770, 771, 772,

773, west boundary of 773, 768 and partly north west boundary of 1784. Then it passes through north of 777, west of

777, north of 779. Then the same line turns towards west direction along north boundary of plot no. 792, 858, 857 and

partly west of 857, north of 839, and west edge of 839 then it passes through partly west boundary of plot no.856, west

of 852, 856, northwest boundary of 856. Then the line turns towards east direction along west boundary of plot no. 856,

South boundary of 865, 866, west boundary of plot no. 869, south edge of plot no. 868. Then the same line turns towards

south direction along partly west boundary of 869 up to north edge of road and turns towards west direction and proceeds

along north edge of same road up to bi-junction pillar of Gohiradanda RF and Kaniha village at point ‘W’.

W-L: Again the same line proceeds south direction along common village boundary of Kaniha and Gohiradanda RF

and touches the bi-junction pillar of same village to close at point ‘L’.

BLOCK-B :

K-J: The line starts from point ‘K’ which is situated on the common boundary of village Jaipur and Kansamunda and

common boundary at plot no. 280 and 4003, then it proceeds towards west direction along the same common village

boundary up to south west corner point number 3894 of village Kansamunda touches the point ‘J’.

J-I: The line starts from ‘J’ and it turns towards north direction. The line enter to the village Kansamunda and proceeds

with touches the west boundary of plot no. 3894,3886,3885,3881,3880,3879,3874, up to Nala, then it turns towards south

west direction and proceeds along the south edge of same Nala then it turns north direction and passes along the west

boundary of plot no. 3915,3928,3688,4510,4511,4512 and up to south west corner of plot no. 3615 then the same line

turns towards north west direction and passes over west boundary plot no. 4515 then it turns towards north direction and

proceeds with crossing the road and proceeds along the west boundary of plot no. 1959 up to north west corner of plot

1959. Next the same line turns towards east direction and passes over northern boundary of plot no. 1959 up to west

corner of plot no.1957. Again the same line turns north east direction passes through west boundary of plot no. 1957,

1962, 1963, 1887, 1828 and it touches the Kansamunda village road. Again the line divert towards south west direction

1008

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 9, 2019/PHALGUNA 18, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

and proceeds along south edge of the same road then the line turns towards north direction and cross the same road and

proceeds up to the edge of road then it turns towards east direction and passes north edge of the plot no.1827, then it

turns towards north direction and goes through western edge of plot no. 1823, 1824 up to point ‘I’, which is situated on

the northwest common boundary point of plot no. 1824 and 1814.

I-H: The line starts from ‘I’ and proceeds towards east direction up to point south east corner of plot no. 1817. Again it

turns towards north direction and proceeds along the eastern boundary of plot no. 1817 up to the plot no. 1818. Again the

line proceeds towards direction east along the boundary of plot no. 1822, 1821 and up to south east corner of plot no.

1785. Then line turns towards north direction and passes over west boundary of plot no.1872 up to north west corner of

plot no.1782 again it turns towards east direction and goes through northern edge of plot no.1782,1781,1780 and then it

moves towards north direction and proceeds along part west boundary of 1777 up to north west corner of 1777 again

same line turns towards north east direction and passes through northern boundary of plot no.1777,4698,1775,4701,1773

and it turns south direction proceeds along east boundary of plot no. 1773 reach up to point ‘H’.

H-K: The line starts from ‘H’ and proceeds towards south direction along west boundary of plot no. 4708 and touch

the Kansamunda village road, the it passes through partly northern boundary of plot no. 1759 and passes through plot

no. 1759. Then it passes along the northern and partly western boundary of plot no. 1682 and 1757, northern and

western boundary of plot no.1751 partly western boundary of plot no-1752, northern and western boundary of plot no.

1754, northern boundary of plot no.1741 , northern and part western boundary of plot no. 1740, northern and western

boundary of plot no. 1737, partly western boundary of plot no. 1706 , northern and western boundary of plot no. 4412,

western boundary of plot no. 1707, partly northern boundary of plot no. 1713, northern and western boundary of plot

no.1726, part northern and western boundary of plot no. 1721, western boundary of plot no.4577, northern and western

boundary of plot no. 4839, partly northern boundary of plot no.1974 and crosses the plot no . 1974. Then it proceeds

along the northern and partly western boundary of plot no.4060, partly northern boundary of plot no.3962. Eastern,

northern and western boundary of plot no. 3963, part western boundary of plot no. 3962, western boundary of plot no.

4615 and partly western boundary of plot nos. 4615 and 4055, northern boundary of plot nos. 4047and 4046. Northern,

western and partly southern boundary of plot no. 045 and partly western boundary of plot no.4050. Then the lines moves

along the northern and western boundary of plot no-4038, partly western boundary of plot no- 4036, northern and

western boundary of plot no-4024,4026, west boundary of 4017, 4013,4011,4005 and 4004 and closed at Point ‘K’ on

the common village boundary of village Kansamunda and Jaipur.

BLOCK- ‘C’ :

A-B: The line starts at point ‘A’ is the tri junction pillar of village Jamania, Adaitaprasad and Malapasi proceeds

towards south direction along common village boundary of village Malapasi and Jamania. The line touches the tri

junction pillar of village Gundurinali, Jamania and Malapasi. The same line proceeds towards southeast direction along

common village boundary of Gundurinali and Jamania and touches the west side of plot no. 399 of village Jamania.

Then it enter in to village Gundurinali through northwest side of plot no. 485 then it turns towards southeast direction

along the boundary of same plot. After touching this point it turns towards southwest boundary of plot no. 486.again it

turns and proceeds southeast direction along the boundary of above plot . Then the line moves towards southwest and

proceeds along western boundary of plot no. 973 and northern boundary of 972 and moves south direction along west

boundary of plot no. 972,1064,1066,1068 and 1070. Again it turns towards east direction and passes through south side

boundary of plot no. 1070. Then the line turns towards south and passes west boundary of plot no.1074 and 1075. Again

same line turns towards direction southeast and proceeds along the south boundary of plot no. 1075 and 1838. After

touching the common point of plot no. 1838 and 1059. Next it proceeds towards east along south boundary of plot no.

1059 and touches the village road again it turns towards south direction and proceeds west edge of same road up to end

point of the road and turns towards east and passes up to its width. The same line moves towards northwest direction

along east part edge of same road and reaches at northwest corner point of plot no.1796. Then it turns towards east

direction along the south boundary of plot no.1795 up to east side common point of plot no. 1795 and 1796. Again it

turns south direction and proceeds through east boundary of plot no. 1796 and 1797., then it turns towards west direction

up to east common boundary point of plot no. 1797and 1798 then it move towards south direction and proceeds along

the east boundary of plot no. 1798 again it turns towards west direction along the south boundary of same plot up to

common point of plot no. 1798 and 1800 again it turns towards south and proceeds along the part east boundary of plot

no. 1800 up to point ‘B’.

B-C: The line starts from point ‘B’ which is situated at southwest side common point of plot no. 1054 of village

Gundurinali. Then the line passes through south boundary of plot no. 1054and reach up to common village boundary of

Gundurinali and Chhelia and enters in to village Chhelia along the south boundary of plot no. 1826 of village Chhelia.

Then it turns towards north direction along the east boundary same plot up to common point of plot no. 1708 and 1826.

Then it moves and proceeds through southern boundary of plot no. 1708, 16, 20, and 21up to common point of 21 and

46. Again it turns towards direction south along west edge of plot no. 46, 47 and south edge of 47 up to common point of

plot no. 47 and 48. Then it turns towards south direction and proceeds through southern boundary of plot no. 61, 65,64

and 74 up to common point of plot no. 74 and 75.Again the line turns towards east direction and passes along southern

boundary of plot no. 74, then it turns and proceeds towards south east direction along west edge of plot no. 1769 again it

moves towards north east direction and proceeds along southern boundary of plot no. 1769 up to south edge of plot no.

139. Again it turns towards southeast direction proceeds along south edge of plot no.139, 137 up to starting point of plot

no. 135. After crossing the width of plot no. 137 the line moves towards northwest direction along the part east edge of

plot no. 137 and touches the common point plot no.137 and 248. Again it moves towards north direction along east edge

of plot no.248 up to plot no. 274. Again the line turns towards southeast direction and proceeds through south boundary

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ekpZ 9] 2019@iQkYxqu 18] 1940

1009

of plot no. 274, 1690, 276, 1662, 1473, 590, 545 and 543 and touches south corner of 543. Again it turns towards

northeast direction and proceeds along western boundary of plot no. 488 and moves towards east direction along the

southern boundary of plot no. 542, 541, 501, 502, 504, 480, 441, 436,420,421,422 up to west edge of Chhelia village

road. Again the same line turns towards north direction and proceeds along the part western edge of the same road up to

common point of plot no 995 and road. Then it turns towards east direction proceeds up to south corner of plot no. 1199.

Again it turns towards south direction and passes through western edge of plot no.1199, 1200 and 1483 up to southwest

corner of 1483. Again it turns towards east direction and passes through south edge no.1483, 1484, 1201, 1202,1203 and

south boundary of 1363,1207,1364,1681 part east of 1485, 1232, 1233, 1530, 1531, 1697, 1696, 1695, 1694, 1693,

1470, 1678, 1687, 1186 and 1184 and again it turns towards south east direction and proceeds along east edge of plot

no. 1318, 1319, 1320, 1321, 1322 and 1327 up to point ‘C’ which is situated at Tri junction pillar or Chhelia,

Kaharmunda and Badatribida.

C-D: The line starts from point ‘C’ and proceeds towards north direction along east side edge of plot no. 1171 that is

the common village boundary of Chhelia and Kaharmunda, up to east corner of plot no. 1170. Again the line turns

towards northeast direction passes through same common village boundary up to Tri- junction pillar of village Chhelia,

Kaharmunda and Kamarei. Next the line proceed towards north direction along common village boundary of Chhelia

and Kamarei through the Tri junction pillar of village Chhelia, Kamarei and Matharagadi R.F. Again it extends in same

direction along the common boundary of village Chhelia and Matharagadi R.F and it touches point ‘D’, which is at

turning point of common village boundary of Kamarei and Matharagadi R.F.

D-E: From point ‘D’ the line starts and proceeds east direction along the common boundary of village Kamarei and

Matharagadi R.F up to point ‘E’ which is east side boundary common point of same R.F.

E-F: The line starts from point ‘E’ moves towards northwest direction and proceed along common boundary of village

Kamarei and Matharagadi R.F upto west corner of plot number 2550 of village Kamarei and again it turns towards

northeast direction and passes through common village boundary of Kamarei and Telisingha and cross tri-junction pillar

of Telisingha, Kamarei and Dandasingha upto bi-junction pillar of Telisingha and Dandasingha. Again same line turns

towards north direction proceed along common village boundary of Dandasingha and Telisingha upto tri-junction pillar

of village Telisingha, Ambapal and Dandasingha. Again it proceeds in same direction along common village boundary of

Telisingha and Ambapal upto point ‘F’ which is situated on the same common boundary and north east corner of plot no.

2594 of village Telisingha.

F-G: The line starts from point ‘F’ proceeds west direction along the north boundary of plot no. 2594 of village

Telisingha again turns to south direction and proceeds along partly west boundary of same plot. Then it turns towards

west direction along the northern boundary of plot no. 817,816,815 and 813 up to northwest corner of plot no. 813. Then

it moves towards south direction along the western boundary of plot no. 813 and 814. After reaching at south west

corner of plot no. 814 again it turns to west direction and proceeds along the north boundary of plot no. 837,840, and

841, again it turns towards south direction along the western boundary of plot no. 840. Then it moves towards north

west direction along the north boundary of plot no. 844,868,869 and 870. then it divert towards south west direction

along the northern boundary of plot no. 870,871,874,876 and 880 up to south west corner of plot no. 880. Again it turns

towards west direction and proceeds along partly north boundary of plot no. 881 up to east side of Telisingha village

road. Again it turns towards south west direction and proceeds along the east edge of same village road up to plot no.

2019. Again same line turns towards south west direction along the west boundary of plot no.2019, 2018, 2082, 2085

and 2087 to touch the southwest corner of plot no. 2085. Again the line moves towards south east direction proceeds

along the south boundary of 2085 up to south corner of plot no. 2085. Again it turns and passes through west boundary

of plot no. 2087 to touch the common boundary point of 2087 and 2208. Again it moves towards west direction and

passes along partly south boundary of 1912 and touch the north common boundary point of 1877 and 2208. Again it

turns towards south direction and proceeds along east boundary of plot no. 1877 to touches the south east corner of plot

no. 1877. Again it turns towards east direction and proceeds along north boundary of plot no. 2631 up to common point

of 2631 and 2207. Again it turns towards south direction and proceeds along east boundary of plot no. 2211 and west

boundary of 2218 up to road. After crossing the Telisingha village road the line move to south direction along east

boundary of plot no. 2255 to touch the point ‘G’, which is situated at common point of plot no. 2255, 2254 and 2257.

G-A: The line starts from point ‘G’. After crossing the village road of Telisingha the line moves towards west direction

along north side of plot no. 2259 up to northwest corner of same plot. Then it moves towards southwest direction along

partly west side boundary of same plot. Then the line proceeds towards west direction along northern boundary of plot

no. 2266 and touch plot no. 2269. Then turns towards south direction along west boundary of the plot no. 2266 up to

southeast corner of plot no. 2269. It moves west direction along southern boundary of plot numbers 2269, 2270, 2271

and 1583 and reach at northeast corner of plot no. 1580. The line turns towards southwest direction along eastern

boundary of plot nos. 1580 and 1581 and reach south east corner of plot no. 1581.Next it turns towards west direction

and proceeds through northern boundary of plot nos. 1582, 1575,1576,1574,1570 and up to road. Again it turns towards

south direction along the western edge of same road up to south corner of plot no. 1562. Again it turns towards west

direction and passes along north boundary of plot no. 1533, 1534,1535,1481,1498 and 1497 and touches the common

village boundary of Telisingha and Jarada. Again it proceeds along the same direction then it enters in to village Jarada

along the northern boundary of plot no. 3785, 3777, 3775, 3774, 3767, 3768 of village Jarada. Next it turns towards

south direction along the part west boundary of 3768 up to common boundary point of 3768 and 3751. Again it moves

towards west direction and proceeds along the north boundary of 3751, 3754 and 3969 to touch east side of pond. Then

1010

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 9, 2019/PHALGUNA 18, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

it turns towards north direction and passes along partly eastern boundary of plot no.3748 (Embankment of Pond) up to

north east corner of the same plot. Again the line moves towards west direction along the northern boundary of plot no.

3747(Pond) up to northwest corner of 3746. Then the same line turns towards south direction to cover partly west

boundary of same plot up to northeast corner of 3968. Again it turns towards west direction and proceeds along the south

boundary of Jarada Basti and reach up to northeast corner of plot no. 3313. The same line turns towards west direction

and proceeds along northern boundary of plot no.3313, 3311, 3309, and 3307 and reach northwest corner of plot no.

3306. Again the line moves towards northwest direction and proceeds along west boundary of plot no. 3304, 3302, 3283,

3282, 3272 and 3271. Again the line proceeds towards west direction along the north boundary of plot no. 1709, east of

1631, north of 1632, 1631, 1633, 1635, 1625, 1622, 1621, 1645, 1646, 1649, 1650, 1604, 1600, 1601, 1681, 1682, and

1683 up to common village boundary of Jarada and Jamania. Then the line moves towards north direction and proceeds

along same village boundary up to plot no. 303 northeast corner of village Jamania. Then the line enters to Jamania

village towards direction northwest and passes along north boundary of plot no. 303,302,301,300,299. Again the line

turns to direction north along the east boundary of plot no. 298 then turn to west direction and proceeds along the north

boundary of plot no. 298,297,509,286,283,588 up to 587. Next the line turns towards north direction and passes along

the partly western boundary of plot no. 276 up to common boundary corner of plot no. 238 and 276. Then the same line

moves towards northwest direction and passes along north boundary of plot no. 238 then it crosses the existing Jamania

village road and proceeds along the south edge of the same village road up to plot no. 60. Then it turns towards south

direction and proceeds along west boundary of plot no. 60. Then it moves west direction and passes along the south

boundary of plot no.59, 57,591. Then the same line turns towards north direction passes along part west boundary of 591

then it turns towards west direction and proceeds along north boundary of plot no 53 up to common corner of plot no 50

and 53. Again it turns towards south direction along the east boundary of plot no. 49 up to southeast corner of plot

no.49. Again moves towards west direction and proceeds along the southern boundary of plot no. 49, 48, 43 and 42 up

to south west corner of plot no.42. Again the same line moves towards north direction along the point eastern boundary

of plot no. 37 up to northeast corner of plot no. 37. Then it turns towards west direction and proceeds along the southern

boundary of plot no. 41, 40,7,39. the same line proceeds along south boundary of 39, part east of 29, south of 29 part

west of 29, south of 27, part west of 27, south of 26,25 and west of 25 to touch the edge of road ant turns towards west

direction along the south edge of same road to close at point ‘A’.

[ F. No. 43015/12/2018-LA & IR]

RAM SHIROMANI SAROJ , Dy. Secy.

परमाणु ऊजा% िवभाग

मुंबई, 14 फरवरी, 2019

का.आ.

का.आ. 324

324

324.— परमाणु ऊजा? अिधिनयम, 1962 (1962 का 33) क धारा 3 के खंड (डी) 'ारा (द) शि+य, का

(योग करते 0ए, कA 3 सरकार एत4ारा अनुसूची मA िविन`द?† ]े<, को िनिष_ ]े< के Mप मA घोिषत करती है जो इस (कार है

अनुसूची

िनिष_ ]े< का नाम

सीमाएं या अ2य िववरण

(1)

(2)

परमाणु खिनज अ2वेषण एवं अनुसंधान िनदेशालय,(पूव‡)र

]े<, िशलांग) - 793 019 परमाणु ऊजा? िवभाग, भारत

सरकार, न,गिमनसग, िशलांग, पूव[ खासी िहस िजला,

मेघालय

काया?लय ]े<: - 2.34 एकड़ ]े<

उ)र मA - न,गमी2स,ग पो8टल ऑफस आवासीय पIरसर।

दि]ण मA - परमाणु खिनज अ2वेषण एवं अनुसंधान

िनदेशालय आवासीय पIरसर पूव? मA - खैIरयम कबीले

क भूिम पिvम मA- लोक िनमा?ण िवभाग क मुVय रोड

(पुिलस बाजार से नेइि‰Yस अ8पताल रोड तक )।

[फा. सं. एईए/19(1)/2017-ईआर]

जयंत खोŠागड़े, संयु+ सिचव

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ekpZ 9] 2019@iQkYxqu 18] 1940

1011

DEPARTMENT OF ATOMIC ENERGY

Mumbai, the 14th February, 2019

S.O. 324.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause(d) of section 3 of the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 (33 of

1962), the Central Government hereby declares the areas specified in the Schedule, to be the prohibited area, namely:-

SCHEDULE

Name of the Prohibited area

Boundaries or other description

(1)

(2)

Atomic Minerals Directorate for Exploration and Research

(Northeastern Region, Shillong) – 793 019.

Department of Atomic Energy, Government of India,

Nongmynsong,

Shillong,

East

Khasi

Hills

District,

Meghalaya.

Office area:-Area measuring 2.34 acres .

On the North - Nongmynsong Postal Office Residential

Complex.

On the South – Atomic Minerals Directorate for

Exploration and Research Residential Complex.

On the East – Khyriem Clan’s Land.

On the West – Main Public Works Department Road

(Police Bazaar to NEIGRIHMS Hospital Road).

[F. No. AEA/19(1)/2017-ER]

JAYANT KHOBRAGADE, Jt. Secy.

आदेश

मुंबई, 14 फरवरी, 2019

का.आ.

का.आ. 325

325

325.— परमाणु ऊजा? अिधिनयम, 1962 (1962 का 33) क धारा 27 'ारा (द) शि+य, का (योग करते

0ए, , , , कA 3 सरकार एत4ारा यह िनदcिशत करती है क उपयु?+ अिधिनयम क धारा 19 'ारा (द) शि+यां उिलिखत अनुसूची

के कॉलम 2 के तहत त=संबंधी (िवि†य, मA उिलिखत सभी या कसी अिधकारी 'ारा भी संल‹ अनुसूची के कॉलम (1) के

तहत िविन`द?† ]े<, जो (ितबंिधत ]े< ह, के संबंध मA (योग क जा सकेगी:-

अनुसूची

िनिष_ ]े< का नाम

ऐसे अिधकारी जो अिधिनयम क धारा 19 के तहत शि+य,

का (योग कर सकते ह।

(1)

(2)

परमाणु खिनज अ2वेषण एवं अनुसंधान िनदेशालय (पूव‡)र

]े<, िशलांग) - 793 019

परमाणु ऊजा? िवभाग, भारत सरकार, न,गिमनसग, िशलांग,

पूव[ खासी िहस िजला, मेघालय

काया?लय ]े<: - 2.34 एकड़ ]े<

1. ]े<ीय िनदेशक, परमाणु खिनज अ2वेषण एवं अनुसंधान

िनदेशालय, उ)र पूव‡)र ]े<

2. उप ]े<ीय िनदेशक, परमाणु खिनज अ2वेषण एवं

अनुसंधान िनदेशालय, उ)र पूव‡)र ]े<

3. सुर]ा अिधकारी, परमाणु खिनज अ2वेषण एवं अनुसंधान

िनदेशालय, उ)र पूव‡)र ]े<

[फा. सं. एईए/19(1)/2017-ईआर]

जयंत खोŠागड़े, संयु+ सिचव

ORDER

Mumbai, the 14th February, 2019

S.O. 325.—In exercise of the powers conferred by section 27 of the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 (33 of 1962), the

Central Government hereby directs that the powers conferred on it by section 19 of the said Act shall, in respect of the

areas specified under column (1) of the Schedule annexed hereto, being a prohibited area, be exercisable also by all or

any of the officers mentioned in the corresponding entries under column (2) of the said Schedule, namely:-

1012

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 9, 2019/PHALGUNA 18, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

SCHEDULE

Name of the Prohibited area

The officer who may exercise powers under section 19

of the said Act

(1)

(2)

Atomic Minerals Directorate

for Exploration and Research

(Northeastern Region, Shillong) – 793 019

Department of Atomic Energy, Government of India,

Nongmynsong, Shillong, East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya.

Office area:- Area measuring 2.34 acres

1. Regional Director, Atomic Minerals Directorate

for Exploration and Research, North Eastern

Region.

2. Deputy Regional Director, Atomic Minerals

Directorate for Exploration and Research, North

Eastern Region.

3. Security Officer, Atomic Minerals Directorate for

Exploration

and

Research,

North

Eastern

Region.

[F. No. AEA/19(1)/2017-ER]

JAYANT KHOBRAGADE, Jt. Secy.

मुंबई, 14 फरवरी, 2019

का.आ.

का.आ. 326

326

326.—परमाणु ऊजा? अिधिनयम, , , , 1962 (1962 का 33) क धारा 3 के खंड (डी) 'ारा (द) शि+य, का

अनुसूची

िनिष_ ]े< का नाम

सीमाएं या अ2य िववरण

(1)

(2)

परमाणु खिनज अ2वेषण एवं अनुसंधान िनदेशालय, दि]णी

]े<, नागरभावी, बAगलूU – 560072, भारत सरकार, परमाणु

ऊजा? िवभाग, कना?टक राŒय।

ऑफस-सह-(योगशाला पIरसर: - नागरभावी गांव, बAगलुU

उ)र तालुक के सवc]ण संVया 6 मA 15 एकड़ भूिम पूव?, पिvम,

उ)र और दि]ण मA िविवŽालय क भूिम से िघरी है, पूव‡)र

मA सवc]ण संVया 57 क बाउ2ी लाइन और दि]ण पिvम मA

ान भारती पIरसर से िवजयनगर जाने वाली सड़क ।

उ)र मA- सवc संVया 6, राीय िश]क िश]ा पIरषद ।

दि]ण मA- सवc संVया 6, िविवŽालय क भूिम

पूव? मA- सवc संVया 6, िविवŽालय भूिम क सवc संVया

57, मौलाना आजाद उदू? िविवŽालय पIरसर ।

पिvम मA- सवc संVया 6, बAगलुM िविवŽालय क

आंतIरक सड़क ।

[फा. सं. एईए/19(1)/2017-ईआर]

जयंत खोŠागड़े, संयु+ सिचव

Mumbai, the 14th February, 2019

S.O. 326.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of section 3 of the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 (33

of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares the areas specified in the Schedule, to be the prohibited area,

namely:-

SCHEDULE

Name of the prohibited area

Boundaries or other description

(1)

(2)

Atomic Minerals Directorate for Exploration and Research,

Southern

Region,

Nagarbhavi,

Bengaluru-

560072.

Department of Atomic Energy, Government of India, State of

Karnataka .

On the North- Survey No.6, National Council for

Teacher Education.

On the South- Survey No.6, University land.

On the East- Survey No.6, University land Survey

No.57, Maulana Azad Urudu University campus.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ekpZ 9] 2019@iQkYxqu 18] 1940

1013

Office cum Laboratory complex:- Area measuring 15 acres of

land in survey number 6 of Nagarbhavi Village, Bengaluru

North Taluk, bounded on the East, West, North and South by

University Land, on the North East by boundary line of

Survey number 57 and on the South West by the road going

to Vijayanagar from Jnana Bharathi campus.

On the West- Survey No.6, Internal Road of Bengaluru

University.

[F. No. AEA/19(1)/2017-ER]

JAYANT KHOBRAGADE, Jt. Secy.

आदेश

मुंबई, 14 फरवरी, 2019

का.आ.

का.आ. 327

327

327.—परमाणु ऊजा? अिधिनयम, 1962 (1962 का 33) क धारा 27 'ारा (द) शि+य, का (योग करते

तहत िविन`द?† ]े<, जो (ितबंिधत ]े< ह, के संबंध मA (योग क जा सकेगी: -

अनुसूची

िनिष_ ]े< का नाम

अिधकारी जो उपयु?+ अिधिनयम क धारा

19 के तहत शि+य, का (योग कर सकता है

(1)

(2)

परमाणु खिनज अ2वेषण एवं अनुसंधान िनदेशालय, दि]णी ]े< नागर भावी

बAगलूU-560 072,

परमाणु ऊजा? िवभाग, भारत सरकार,

बAगलूU – 560072, कना?टक राŒय

ऑफस सह (योगशाला पIरसर:-

नागरभावी गांव, बAगलुU उ)र तालुक के सवc]ण संVया 6 मA 15 एकड़ भूिम

]े<, पूव‡)र पर, सवc]ण संVया 57 क सीमा रेखा से पूव?, पिvम, उ)र और

दि]ण मA ि8थत है, दि]ण पिvम मA ान भारती पIरसर से िवजयनगर जाने

वाली सड़क ि8थत है ।

1.]े<ीय िनदेशक, दि]णी ]े<

2.उप ]े<ीय िनदेशक, दि]णी ]े<

[फा. सं. एईए/19(1)/2017-ईआर]

जयंत खोŠागड़े, , , , संयु+ सिचव

ORDER

Mumbai, the 14th February, 2019

S.O. 327.—In exercise of the powers conferred by section 27 of the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 (33 of 1962), the

Central Government hereby directs that the powers conferred on it by section 19 of the said Act shall, in respect of the

areas specified under column(1) of the Schedule annexed hereto, being a prohibited area, be exercisable also by all or

any of the officers mentioned in the corresponding entries under column (2) of the said Schedule, namely:-

SCHEDULE

Name of the prohibited area

The officer who may exercise powers under

section 19 of the said Act

(1)

(2)

Atomic Minerals Directorate for Exploration and Research, Southern

Region, Nagarbhavi, Bengaluru - 560 072. Department of Atomic

Energy, Government of India, State of Karnataka.

1.Regional Director, Southern Region.

2.Deputy Regional Director, Southern Region.

1014

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 9, 2019/PHALGUNA 18, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Office cum Laboratory complex:-

Area measuring 15 acres of land in survey number 6 of Nagarbhavi

Village, Bengaluru North Taluk, bounded on the East, West, North and

South by University Land, on the North East by boundary line of

Survey number 57 and on the South West by the road going to

Vijayanagar from Jnana Bharathi campus.

[F. No. AEA/19(1)/2017-ER]

JAYANT KHOBRAGADE, Jt. Secy.

मुंबई, 14 फरवरी, 2019

का.आ.

का.आ. 328

328

328.—परमाणु ऊजा? अिधिनयम, 1962 (1962 का 33) क धारा 3 के खंड (डी) 'ारा (द) शि+य, का

(योग करते 0ए, कA 3 सरकार एत4ारा अनुसूची मA िविन`द?† ]े<, को िनिष_ ]े< के Mप मA घोिषत करती है जो इस (कार है:

अनुसूची

िनिष_ ]े< का नाम

सीमाएं या अ2य िववरण

परमाणु खिनज अ2वेषण एवं अनुसंधान िनदेशालय

परमाणु ऊजा? िवभाग, भारत सरकार

पिvमी ]े<, से\टर 5, (िव8तार)

राज8थान हाउNसंग बोड?, सांगानेर, जयपुर -302033

परमाणु खिनज अ2वेषण एवं अनुसंधान िनदेशालय,

पIरसर साइट:-

]े<फल 24,272 वग? मीटर राज8थान हाउNसंग बोड?,

खसरा नं 406/700 और 406/723 क भूिम, सब-

िडिवज़न सांगानेर, िजला-जयपुर, राज8थान

उ)र पूव? मA: साव?जिनक सड़क 30 फट चौड़ी, ट,क रोड

एनएच-12 से सांगानेर गांव से जुड़ी सड़क।

उ)र पिvम मA: परमाणु खिनज अ2वेषण एवं अनुसंधान

िनदेशालय आवासीय कालोनी

दि]ण पूव? मA: साव?जिनक सड़क 30 फट चौड़ी (ट,क रोड

एनएच 12 से सांगानेर गांव से जुड़ी सड़क)।

दि]ण पिvम मA: परमाणु खिनज िनदेशालय के िलए 30 फट

चौड़ी साव?जिनक सड़क अ2वेषण और अनुसंधान आवासीय

कॉलोनी.

[फा. सं. एईए/19(1)/2017-ईआर]

जयंत खोŠागड़े, संयु+ सिचव

Mumbai, the 14th February, 2019

S.O. 328.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of section 3 of the Atomic Energy Act ,1962 (33

of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares the area specified in the Schedule, to be the prohibited area namely -

SCHEDULE

Name of the Prohibited area

Boundaries or other description

Atomic

Minerals

Directorate

For

Exploration

and

Research, Department of Atomic Energy, Government of

India.

Western Region, Sector 5, (EXT.) Rajasthan Housing

Board, Sanganer, JAIPUR-302033.

Atomic

Minerals

Directorate

For

Exploration

and

Research, Complex site:-

Area measuring 24,272sq.mtr. in Rajasthan Housing Board,

Land of Khasara No.406/700 and 406/723, under sub-

division Sanganer, District- Jaipur, Rajasthan.

On the North East: Public road 30 feet wide, Road linked

with Tonk Road N H 12 to Sanganer village.

On the North west: Atomic Minerals Directorate

For Exploration and Research, Residential Colony.

On the South East: Public road 30 feet wide (Road linked

with Tonk Road N H 12 to Sanganer village).

On the South West: Public road 30 feet wide towards

Atomic Minerals Directorate For

Exploration and Research Residential colony.

[F. No. AEA/19(1)/2017-ER]

JAYANT KHOBRAGADE, Jt. Secy.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ekpZ 9] 2019@iQkYxqu 18] 1940

1015

आदेश

मुंबई, 14 फरवरी, 2019

का.आ.

का.आ. 329

329

329.—परमाणु ऊजा? अिधिनयम, 1962 (1962 का 33) क धारा 27 'ारा (द) शि+य, का (योग करते

तहत िविन`द?† ]े<, जो (ितबंिधत ]े< ह, के संबंध मA (योग क जा सकेगी:-

अनुसूची

िनिष_ ]े< का नाम

अिधकारी जो उपयु?+ अिधिनयम के

धारा 1 9 के तहत शि+य, का (योग कर

सकते ह

परमाणु खिनज अ2वेषण एवं अनुसंधान िनदेशालय

परमाणु ऊजा? िवभाग, भारत सरकार

पिvमी ]े<, से\टर 5, (िव8तार) राज8थान हाउNसंग बोड?, सांगानेर, जयपुर -

302033 राज8थान।

परमाणु खिनज अ2वेषण एवं अनुसंधान िनदेशालय, पIरसर 8थल

सब-िडिवज़न सांगानेर, िजला-जयपुर, राज8थान के तहत राज8थान हाउNसंग

बोड? आरएचबी का 24,272 वग? मीटर का ]े<फल खसरा नं. 406/700 और

406/723 क भूिम।

]े<ीय िनदेशक

उप ]े<ीय िनदेशक

सहायक काLम?क अिधकारी

सुर]ा अिधकारी

[फा. सं. एईए/19(1)/2017-ईआर]

जयंत खोŠागड़े, संयु+ सिचव

ORDER

Mumbai, the 14th February, 2019

S.O. 329.—In exercise of the powers conferred by section 27 of the Atomic Energy Act 1962 (33 of

1962), the central Government hereby directs that the power conferred on it by section 19 of the said Act

shall, in respect of the areas specified under column (1) of the schedule annexed hereto , being a prohibited

area , be exercisable also by all or any of the officer mentioned in the corresponding entries under column (2)

of the said Schedule, namely:-

SCHEDULE

Name of the Prohibited area

The Officers who

may exercise

powers under section 19 of the said

Act.

Atomic Minerals Directorate For Exploration and Research,

Department of Atomic Energy, Govt. of India

Western Region, Sector –5, (EXT.) Rajasthan Housing Board, Sanganer,

JAIPUR-302033, Rajasthan.

Atomic Minerals Directorate For Exploration and Research, Complex site

Area measuring 24,272sq.m in Rajasthan Housing Board R.H.B. Land of

Khasara No.406/700 and 406/723, under sub-division Sanganer, District-

Jaipur, Rajasthan.

Regional Director.

Deputy Regional Director.

Assistant Personnel Officer.

Security Officer.

[F. No. AEA/19(1)/2017-ER]

JAYANT KHOBRAGADE, Jt. Secy.

1016

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 9, 2019/PHALGUNA 18, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

मुंबई, 14 फरवरी, 2019

का.आ.

का.आ. 330

330

330.—परमाणु ऊजा? अिधिनयम, 1962 (1962 का 33) क धारा 3 के खंड (डी) 'ारा (द) शि+य, का

अनुसूची

िनिष' (े* का नाम

सीमाएं या अ.य िववरण

(1)

(2)

परमाणु खिनज अ2वेषण एवं अनुसंधान िनदेशालय

पूव[ ]े<,परमाणु ऊजा? िवभाग,

भारत सरकार, िजला- पूव[ Nसंहभूम, टाटानगर - 831002, झारखंड

संयं< 8थल :-

परमाणु खिनज अ2वेषण एवं अनुसंधान िनदेशालय,

काया?लय पIरसर

]े< 3.80 एकड़ (15387.3169 वग? मीटर)

मौज़ा

थाना

खाता

नंबर

eलाट

नं

टाटानगर

खासमहल

eलाट न.

लाट

कतािध

1167

445

1392/P

206,

207,

208,

209,

210,

211,

212,

213,

214,

215,

216,

217,

218,

219,

220,

221,

596,

597

एवं

598.

उ)र क ओर: कतादीह रोड

दि]ण क तरफ: ामीण इंजीिनय’रंग

संगठन और “लॉक िवकास “लॉक िवकास

काया?लय

पूव? क ओर: जमशेदपुर-\य,झार, राजमाग?

पिvम क तरफ: टाटानगर

खासमहल eलॉट संVया 222, 245, 482,

570, 477 और 476 जो परमाणु खिनज

अ2वेषण और अनुसंधान िनदेशालय का

आवासीय ]े< ।

[फा.सं. एईए/19(1)/2017-ईआर]

जयंत खोŠागड़े, , , , संयु+ सिचव

Mumbai, the 14th February, 2019

S.O. 330.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of section 3 of the Atomic Energy Act ,1962 (33

of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares the area specified in the Schedule, to be the prohibited area, namely :-

SCHEDULE

Name of the prohibited area

Boundaries or other description

(1)

(2)

Atomic

Minerals

Directorate for Exploration and

Research, Eastern

Region,

Department of Atomic Energy,

Government

India,

Dist.

East Singhbhum,

Tatanagar - 831002, Jharkhand.

North side :Kitadih Road

South side :Rural Engineering Organisation and

Block Development Office

East side: Jamshedpur-Keonjhar, Highway

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ekpZ 9] 2019@iQkYxqu 18] 1940

1017

Plant site :-

AtomicMinerals Directorate for Exploration and Research, Office

Complex

Area 3.80 Acre (15387.3169 sq.m)

West side : Tatanagar

Khasmahal Plot No.222, 245, 482,

570, 477 and 476 belong to Atomic Minerals

Directorate for Exploration and Research,

Residential area.

Mouza

Thana

Khata

Number.

Plot

No.

Tatanagar

Khasmahal Plot

Nos.

Plot

Kitadih

1167

445

1392/P

206,

207,

208,

209,

210,

211,

212,

213,

214,

215,

216,

217,

218,

219,

220,

221,

596,

597

and 598.

[F. No. AEA/19(1)/2017-ER]

JAYANT KHOBRAGADE, Jt. Secy.

आदेश

मुंबई, 14 फरवरी, 2019

का.आ.

का.आ. 331

331

331.—परमाणु ऊजा? अिधिनयम, 1962 (1962 का 33) क धारा 27 'ारा (द) शि+य, का (योग करते

तहत िविन`द?† ]े<, जो (ितबंिधत ]े< ह, के संबंध मA (योग क जा सकेगी :-

अनुसूची

िनिष_ ]े< का नाम

अिधकारी जो अिधिनयम के धारा 19 के तहत

शि+य, का (योग कर सकता है

(1)

(2)

परमाणु खिनज अ2वेषण एवं अनुसंधान िनदेशालय

पूव[ ]े<, परमाणु ऊजा? िवभाग,

भारत सरकार, िजला- पूव[ Nसंहभूम,

टाटानगर - 831002, झारखंड

1. ेीय िनदेशक, परमाणु खिनज अ2वेषण एवं

अनुसंधान िनदेशालय, पूव[ ]े<

2. उप ]े<ीय िनदेशक, परमाणु खिनज िनदेशालय और

अनुसंधान, पूव[ ]े<

3. सहायक काLम?क अिधकारी, परमाणु खिनज अ2वेषण

एवं अनुसंधान िनदेशालय, पूव[ ]े<

4. सुर]ा अिधकारी परमाणु खिनज अ2वेषण एवं

अनुसंधान िनदेशालय, पूव[ ]े<

काया?लय साइट: -

कताडीह मौजा, थाना सं. 1167 के अंतग?त 3.80 एकड़

(15387.3169 वग? मीटर) ]े<, खाता संVया 445 eलॉट

संVया 1392/पी तथा टाटानगर खासमहल eलॉट नं. 206,

207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213,214, 215, 216,

217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 596, 597 और 598

[फा. सं. एईए/19(1)/2017-ईआर]

जयंत खोŠागड़े, संयु+ सिचव

1018

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 9, 2019/PHALGUNA 18, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ORDER

Mumbai, the 14th February, 2019

S.O.331.—In exercise of the powers conferred by section 27 of the Atomic Energy Act 1962 (33 of 1962), the

central Government hereby directs that the powers conferred on it by section 19 of the said Act shall, in respect of the

areas specified under column (1) of the schedule annexed hereto , being a prohibited area , be exercisable also by all or

any of the officers mentioned in the corresponding entries under column (2) of the said Schedule, namely:-

SCHEDULE

Name of the Prohibited area

The Officer who may exercise powers under section

19 of the said Act

(1)

(2)

Atomic

Minerals

Directorate for Exploration and

Research, Eastern

Region, Department of Atomic Energy,

Government of India, Dist. East Singhbhum,

Tatanagar - 831002, Jharkhand.

1. Regional Director, Atomic

Minerals Directorate

for Exploration and Research, Eastern Region.

2. Deputy Regional Director, Atomic Minerals

Directorate for Exploration and Research, Eastern

Region.

3. Assistant Personnel Officer, Atomic Minerals

Directorate for Exploration and Research, Eastern

Region.

4. Security Officer, Atomic Minerals

Directorate

for Exploration and Research, Eastern Region.

Office Site:-

Area

measuring

3.80 Acre

(15387.3169

sq.m) falling under Kitadih Mouza, Thana

No. 1167, Khata Number 445 Plot Number 1392/P and

Tatanagar Khasmahal Plot

Numbers 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213,214, 215,

216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 596, 597 and 598.

[F. No. AEA/19(1)/2017-ER]

JAYANT KHOBRAGADE, Jt. Secy.

मुंबई, 14 फरवरी, 2019

का. आ.

का. आ. 332

332

332.—परमाणु ऊजा? अिधिनयम, 1962 (1962 का 33) क धारा 3 के खंड (डी) 'ारा (द) शि+य, का

िनिष_ ]े< का नाम

सीमाएं या अ2य िववरण

(1)

(2)

परमाणु खिनज अ2वेषण एवं अनुसंधान िनदेशालय का

काया?लय पIरसर

परमाणु ऊजा? िवभाग, भारत सरकार, िजला नागपुर,

महारा- 440001

िनmिलिखत उप खंड, के तहत 5.77 एकड़ ]े< :-

सवc]ण संVया 51, 52

बंगला नंबर 16ए 16बी

शीट संVया 109,110/98

खसरा संVया 9

मौज़ा धरमपेट

उ)र मA: सेिमनरी पहािड़य, क ओर तेलAखेड़ी रोड।

पूव? मA: कA 3ीय लोक िनमा?ण िवभाग के ”ाट?र और भारत क

राीय ईसाई पIरषद।

दि]ण मA: बी और सी बंगले (राŒय सरकार) और कA 3ीय (ांत

\लब रोड़।

पिvम मA: रिवनगर और बी और सी बंगल, क ओर सड़क

(राŒय सरकार)

[फा. सं. एईए/19(1)/2017-ईआर]

जयंत खोŠागड़े, , , , संयु+ सिचव

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ekpZ 9] 2019@iQkYxqu 18] 1940

1019

Mumbai, the 14th February, 2019

S.O. 332.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause(d) of section (3) of the Atomic Energy Act, 1962(33

of 1962), the central Government hereby declares the areas specified in the schedule, to be the prohibited area, namely:-

SCHEDULE

Name of the prohibited area

Boundaries or other description

(1)

(2)

Atomic Minerals Directorate for Exploration and

Research Office Complex

Department of Atomic Energy, Government of India,

District Nagpur Maharashtra- 440001

Area measuring 5.77 acres under following sub division

of :-

SURVEY NUMBER 51,52

BUNGALOW NUMBER 16A 16B

SHEET NUMBER 109,110/98

KHASRA NUMBER 9

MAUZA DHARAMPETH.

the

North:

Telenkhedi

road

towards

Seminary hills.

On the East: Central Public Works Department quarters and

National Christian council of India.

On the South: B and C Bungalows (State Government) and

Central Provinces club road.

On the West: Road towards Ravinagar and B and C

bungalows (State Government)

[F. No. AEA/19(1)/2017-ER]

JAYANT KHOBRAGADE, Jt. Secy.

आदेश

मुंबई, 14 फरवरी, 2019

का.आ.

का.आ. 333

333

333.—परमाणु ऊजा? अिधिनयम, 1962 (1962 का 33) क धारा 27 'ारा (द) शि+य, का (योग करते

तहत िविन`द?† ]े<, जो (ितबंिधत ]े< ह, के संबंध मA (योग क जा सकेगी:-

अनुसूची

िनिष_ ]े< का नाम

अिधकारी जो अिधिनयम के धारा 19 के तहत शि+य, का

(योग कर सकते ह

(1)

(2)

परमाणु खिनज अ2वेषण एवं अनुसंधान िनदेशालय का

काया?लय पIरसर

परमाणु ऊजा? िवभाग, भारत सरकार, िजला नागपुर

महारा- 440001

िनmिलिखत उप खंड, के तहत 5.77 एकड़ ]े< :-

सवc]ण संVया 51,52

बंगला नंबर 16ए 16बी

शीट संVया 109,110/98

खसरा संVया 9

मौज़ा धरमपेट

1. ]े<ीय िनदेशक, मkयवत[ ]े<,

परमाणु खिनज अ2वेषण एवं अनुसंधान िनदेशालय

नागपुर.

2 उप ]े<ीय िनदेशक, मkयवत[ ]े<, परमाणु खिनज अ2वेषण

एवं अनुसंधान िनदेशालय,नागपुर.

3. सहायक काLम?क अिधकारी, मkयवत[ ]े<, परमाणु खिनज

अ2वेषण एवं अनुसंधान िनदेशालय, नागपुर

[फा. सं. एईए/19(1)/2017-ईआर]

जयंत खोŠागड़े, , , , संयु+ सिचव

1020

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 9, 2019/PHALGUNA 18, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ORDER

Mumbai, the 14th February, 2019

S.O. 333.—In exercise of the powers conferred by section 27 of the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 (33 of 1962) the

central government hereby directs that the powers conferred on it by section 19 of the said Act shall, in respect of the

areas specified under column(1) of the schedule annexed hereto, being a prohibited area, be exercisable also by all or any

of the officers mentioned in the corresponding entries in column(2) of the said schedule, namely:-

SCHEDULE

Name of the prohibited Area.

The Officer who may exercise powers under section 19 of

the said Act.

(1)

(2)

Atomic

Minerals

Directorate

for

Exploration

and

Research Office Complex.

Department of Atomic Energy, Government of India,

District Nagpur Maharashtra- 440001.

Area measuring 5.77 acres under following sub division

of:-

SURVEY NUMBER 51,52

BUNGALOW NUMBER 16A 16B

SHEET NUMBER 109,110/98

KHASRA NUMBER 9

MAUZA DHARAMPETH.

Regional Director, Central Region, Atomic

Mineral Directorate for Exploration and

Research, Nagpur.

2. Deputy Regional Director, Central Region,

Atomic Mineral Directorate for Exploration and

Research, Nagpur.

3. Assistant personnel officer, Central Region,

Atomic Mineral Directorate for Exploration and

Research, Nagpur.

[F. No. AEA/19(1)/2017-ER]

JAYANT KHOBRAGADE, Jt. Secy.

isVªksfy;e vkSj izkÑfrd xSl ea=ky;

ubZ fnYyh] 25 Qjojh] 2019

dk-vk- 334&dsUnzh; ljdkj us isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbZu ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½ vf/kfu;e]

1962 ¼1962 dk 50½ ¼ftls blesa blds i'pkr~ mä vf/kfu;e dgk x;k gSa½ dh /kkjk 3 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ ds v/khu tkjh dh

xbZ Hkkjr ljdkj ds isVªksfy;e vkSj izkÑfrd xSl ea=ky; dh vf/klwpuk la[;k dk-vk- 2215 rkjh[k 14 flrEcj] 2017 tks

Hkkjr ds jkti= Øekad 38 rkjh[k 17 flrEcj & 23 flrEcj 2017 ,oa dk-vk- 1101 rkjh[k 17 tqykÃ] 2018 tks Hkkjr ds

jkti= dzekad 29] rkjh[k 22 tqykÃ & 28 tqykÃ 2018 esa izdkf'kr dh xbZ Fkh }kjk ml vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa

fofufnZ"V Hkwfe esa egkjk"Vª jkT; esa ftyk ukfld esa rkYkqdk ukanxako dks;yh & vgenuxj & lksykiqj isVªksfy;e ifjogu ds

fy, bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZj'ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbiykbZu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj ds vtZu ds vius

vk'k; dh ?kks"k.kk dh Fkh (

vkSj mä jkti= vf/kfu;e dh izfr;ka turk dks rkjh[k 19 flrEcj] 2018 rd miyC/k djk dh xbZ Fkh (

vkSj l{ke izkf/kdkjh us mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ ds v/khu dsUæh; ljdkj dks fjiksVZ dh gS (

vkSj dsUæh; ljdkj us] mä fjiksVZ ij fopkj djus ds i'pkr~ vkSj ;g lek/kku gks tkus ij fd mä Hkwfe ikbiykbZu fcNkus

ds fy, visf{kr gS] mlesa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu djus dk fofu'p; fd;k gS (

vr% vc] dsUæh; ljdkj mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk iznÙk 'kfä;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, ;g ?kks"k.kk

djrh gS fd bl vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa fofufnZ"V Hkwfe esa ikbiykbZu fcNkus ds fy, mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu

fd;k tk, (

vkSj ljdkj mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi&/kkjk ¼4½ }kjk iznÙk 'kfä;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] ;g funsZ'k nsrh gS fd mä

Hkwfe esa mi;ksx dk vf/kdkj bl ?kks"k.kk ds izdk'ku dh rkjh[k ls dsUæh; ljdkj esa fufgr gksus ds ctk,] lHkh foYyaxeksa ls

eqä gksdj bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZj'ku fyfeVsM esa fufgr gksxh A

isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbZu vf/kfu;e] 1962 dh /kkjk 10 ds v/khu fdlh Hkh {kfriwfrZ ds fy, bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku

fyfeVsM iw.kZr;k mÙkjnk;h gksxh vkSj ikbiykbZu ls lEcfU/kr fdlh Hkh ekeys ij dsUæh; ljdkj ds fo#) dksbZ okn nkok ;k

dkuwuh dk;Zokgh ugha gks ldsxhA

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ekpZ 9] 2019@iQkYxqu 18] 1940

1021

vuqlwPkh

rkyqdk%&ukanxako

ftyk%& ukfld

jkT;%& egkjk"Vª

ekSts @xzke

losZ @ Cykd @ la-

¼IyksV la-½

lc&Mho&la-

{ks=Qy

gsDVs;j

vkjs

oxZ ehVj

¼1½

¼2½

¼3½

¼4½

¼5½

cks;xkao

142

HkkMhZ

106

105@1c

105@2

104@1

104@2

103@v@2

103@c@2@2

103@v@1@c

103@c@2@1

103@c@1@3

103@c@1@2

103@c@1@1

102@1

102@2

101

100

uolkjh

179@1

178

177

162

160

159

158

157

156

161

154

155

122@v@2

120@v@1

120@v@2

120@c@1

119@1

119@2

[kknxkao

37@1@1

37@1@2

37@1@3

37@4

1@c@2@v

2@c

288

289@M

289@Ã

289@d

302

298

299

300@1

300@2

1022

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 9, 2019/PHALGUNA 18, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

¼1½

¼2½

¼3½

¼4½

¼5½

[kknxkao

301

305@v

206@1

206@1@av

206@2

205@1

205@2

205@3

204

203

202@1

202@2@2

202@2@3

201@c

201@2@v

vLrxkao

36@1

36@2

35@1

35@2

54 iSdh

55@4

55@6

55@7

54@5

106@1

106@2

106@3

109@c1@v1@2@1

109@c1@v@3@1

109@c1@v@3@3

120@3

121@2

122@2

123@1

123@2

123@3

123@4

123@5

123@6

124

125

[Qk- la- vkj&11025¼11½6@2018&vksvkj&I@bZ&23678]

'kkUruq /kj] voj lfpo

MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS

New Delhi, the 25th February, 2019

S.O. 334.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural

Gas vide S.O. No. 2215 dated the 14^th September, 2017, issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and

Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said

Act), Published in the Gazette of India No.38 dated the 17^th September-23^rd September 2017, and Gazette of India, No.29

dated 22 – 28 July, 2018 S.O.No.1101 dated 17^th July 2018 the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the

right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying Koyali-

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ekpZ 9] 2019@iQkYxqu 18] 1940

1023

Ahmednagar-Solapur Pipeline for the transportation of Petroleum Products in Taluka Nandgaon in Nashik District in the

State of Maharashtra by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public up to 19^th September

2018;

And whereas the competent authority has under sub-section (1) of Section 6 of said act submitted report to the

Central Government;

And Whereas the Central Government, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land

is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of user therein;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is

hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby directs that right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the Central

Government, vest on the date of publication of the declaration, in Indian Oil Corporation Limited, free from all

encumbrances.

Indian Oil Corporation Limited shall be exclusively liable for any compensation in terms of Section 10 of the P

& MP Act, 1962 and no suit, claim or legal proceeding would lie against the Central Government on any matter relating

to the pipeline.

SCHEDULE

Taluka:- Nandgaon

District:- Nashik

State :- Maharashtra

Mouje / Village

Survey/Block No.

Sub-Div-No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

Boygaon

142

Bhardi

106

105/1B

105/2

104/1

104/2

103/A/2

103/B/2/2

103/A/1/B

103/B/2/1

103/B/1/3

103/B/1/2

103/B/1/1

102/1

102/2

101

100

Nawasari

179/1

178

177

162

160

159

158

157

156

161

154

155

122/A/2

120/A/1

120/A/2

120/B/1

119/1

119/2

Khadgaon

37/1/1

1024

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 9, 2019/PHALGUNA 18, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

Khadgaon

37/1/2

37/1/3

37/4

1/B/2/A

2/B

288

289/D

289/E

289/K

302

298

299

300/1

300/2

301

305/A

206/1

206/1/A

206/2

205/1

205/2

205/3

204

203

202/1

202/2/2

202/2/3

201/B

201/2/A

Astagaon

36/1

36/2

35/1

35/2

54 Paiki

55/4

55/6

55/7

54/5

106/1

106/2

106/3

109/B1/A1/2/1

109/B1/A/3/1

109/B1/A/3/3

120/3

121/2

122/2

123/1

123/2

123/3

123/4

123/5

123/6

124

125

[F. No. R-11025(11)6/2018-OR-I/E-23678]

SANTANU DHAR, Under Secy.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ekpZ 9] 2019@iQkYxqu 18] 1940

1025

ubZ fnYyh] 25 Qjojh] 2019

dk-vk- 335-&dsUnzh; ljdkj us isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbZu ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½ vf/kfu;e]

1962 ¼1962 dk 50½ ¼ftls blesa blds i'pkr~ mä vf/kfu;e dgk x;k gSa½ dh /kkjk 3 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ ds v/khu tkjh dh

xbZ Hkkjr ljdkj ds isVªksfy;e vkSj izkÑfrd xSl ea=ky; dh vf/klwpuk la[;k dk-vk- 1097 rkjh[k 17 tqykÃ] 2018 tks

Hkkjr ds jkti= Øekad 29] rkjh[k 22 tqykÃ & 28 tqykÃ 2018 esa izdkf'kr dh xbZ Fkh }kjk ml vf/klwpuk ls layXu

vuqlwph esa fofufnZ"V Hkwfe esa egkjk"Vª jkT; esa ftyk vgenuxj esa rkYkqdk uxj dks;yh & vgenuxj & lksykiqj isVªksfy;e

ifjogu ds fy, bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZj'ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbiykbZu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj ds vtZu

ds vius vk'k; dh ?kks"k.kk dh Fkh (

vkSj mä jkti= vf/kfu;e dh izfr;ka turk dks rkjh[k 25 vDrwcj 2018 rd miyC/k djk nh xbZ Fkh (

vkSj l{ke izkf/kdkjh us mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ ds v/khu dsUæh; ljdkj dks fjiksVZ dh gS (

vkSj dsUæh; ljdkj us] mä fjiksVZ ij fopkj djus ds i'pkr~ vkSj ;g lek/kku gks tkus ij fd mä Hkwfe ikbiykbZu fcNkus

ds fy, visf{kr gS] mlesa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu djus dk fofu'p; fd;k gS (

vr% vc] dsUæh; ljdkj mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk iznÙk 'kfä;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, ;g ?kks"k.kk

djrh gS fd bl vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa fofufnZ"V Hkwfe esa ikbiykbZu fcNkus ds fy, mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu

fd;k tk, (

vkSj ljdkj mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi&/kkjk ¼4½ }kjk iznÙk 'kfä;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] ;g funsZ'k nsrh gS fd mä

Hkwfe esa mi;ksx dk vf/kdkj bl ?kks"k.kk ds izdk'ku dh rkjh[k ls dsUæh; ljdkj esa fufgr gksus ds ctk,] lHkh foYyaxeksa ls

eqä gksdj bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZj'ku fyfeVsM esa fufgr gksxh A

isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbZu vf/kfu;e] 1962 dh /kkjk 10 ds v/khu fdlh Hkh {kfriwfrZ ds fy, bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZj'ku

fyfeVsM iw.kZr;k mÙkjnk;h gksxh vkSj ikbiykbZu ls lEcfU/kr fdlh Hkh ekeys ij dsUæh; ljdkj ds fo#) dksbZ okn nkok ;k

dkuwuh dk;Zokgh ugha gks ldsxhA

vuqlwPkh

rkyqdk%& uxj

ftyk%& vgenuxj

jkT;%& egkjk"Vª

ekSts @xzke

losZ @ Cykd @ la-

¼IyksV la-½

lc&Mho&la-

{ks=Qy

gsDVs;j

vkjs

oxZ ehVj

¼1½

¼2½

¼3½

¼4½

¼5½

¼6½

ukanxkao

9@1c@1@2

10@1v@2v@2

10@1v@2c@1v@1@1c@1

10@1v@2c@1v@1@1c@3

11@2

11@1

13@1

13@2@1

f'kaxos

32@1@1@c@1

32@2@1

32@3@1

30@2@3@v1

30@4@5@1@2

30@4@5@1@3

1026

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 9, 2019/PHALGUNA 18, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

¼1½

¼2½

¼3½

¼4½

¼5½

¼6½

29@1

29@2v

29@5

28@1c@2@2

28@1v@2@1

28@2@5

27@1v

27@1d@6v@3@4@5@2

27@1d@6v@3@4@5@3

27@7@2

27@7@1

27@8

113@1

18@2

18@1

81@4

81@3

78@1v

78@1@c@4@c

blekyiqj

19@2

15@1

15@2

111

110

108@1

108@2

107@1

99@3@1

122

123@1

123@2

126@1

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ekpZ 9] 2019@iQkYxqu 18] 1940

1027

¼1½

¼2½

¼3½

¼4½

¼5½

¼6½

130@1@1

130@1@2

130@1@3

130@1@4

130@1@5

130@1@6

130@2

132@1@2

132@3@1

136

nsgjs

221

220@1

219

195

196

197@3

197@1@v

198@1

199@1¼199@3½

189@1v

189@2

178@2

178@1@v@2@1@c@2

178@1@v@1

178@1@c@1

[Qk- la- vkj&11025¼11½6@2018&vksvkj&I@bZ&23678]

'kkUruq /kj] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 25th February, 2019

S. O. 335.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural

Gas vide S.O.No.1097 dated 17^th July 2018 issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals

Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (here in after referred to as the said Act),

Published in the Gazette of India, No.29 dated 22 – 28 July, 2018 the Central Government declared its intention to

acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying

Koyali-Ahmednagar-Solapur Pipeline for the transportation of Petroleum Products in Taluka Rahuri in Ahmadnagar

District in the State of Maharashtra by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public up to 25 October 2018;

1028

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 9, 2019/PHALGUNA 18, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

And whereas the competent authority has under sub-section (1) of Section 6 of said act submitted report to the

Central Government;

And Whereas the Central Government, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land

is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of user therein;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is

hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby directs that right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the Central

Government, vest on the date of publication of the declaration, in Indian Oil Corporation Limited, free from all

encumbrances.

Indian Oil Corporation Limited shall be exclusively liable for any compensation in terms of Section 10 of the P

& MP Act, 1962 and no suit, claim or legal proceeding would lie against the Central Government on any matter relating

to the pipeline.

SCHEDULE

Taluka:- Nagar

District:- Ahmadnagar

State :- Maharashtra

Mouje / Village

Survey/Block No.

Sub-Div-No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

Nandgaon

9/1B/1/2

10/1A/2A/2

10/1A/2B/1A/1/1B/1

10/1A/2B/1A/1/1B/3

11/2

11/1

13/1

13/2/1

Shingawe

32/1/1/B/1

32/2/1

32/3/1

30/2/3/A1

30/4/5/1/2

30/4/5/1/3

29/1

29/2A

29/5

28/1B/2/2

28/1A/2/1

28/2/5

27/1A

27/1K/6A/3/4/5/2

27/1K/6A/3/4/5/3

27/7/2

27/7/1

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ekpZ 9] 2019@iQkYxqu 18] 1940

1029

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

27/8

113/1

18/2

18/1

81/4

81/3

78/1A

78/1/B/4/B

Ismalpur

19/2

15/1

15/2

111

110

108/1

108/2

107/1

99/3/1

122

123/1

123/2

126/1

130/1/1

130/1/2

130/1/3

130/1/4

130/1/5

130/1/6

130/2

132/1/2

132/3/1

136

Dehare

221

220/1

219

195

196

197/3

1030

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 9, 2019/PHALGUNA 18, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

197/1/A

198/1

199/1(199/3)

189/1A

189/2

178/2

178/1/A/2/1/B/2

178/1/A/1

178/1/B/1

[F. No. R-11025(11)6/2018-OR-I/E-23678]

SANTANU DHAR, Under Secy.

ubZ fnYyh] 25 Qjojh] 2019

dk-vk- 336-&dsUnzh; ljdkj us isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbZiykbZu ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½ vf/kfu;e]

1962 ¼1962 dk 50½ ¼ftls blesa blds i'pkr~ mä vf/kfu;e dgk x;k gSa½ dh /kkjk 3 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ ds v/khu tkjh dh

xbZ Hkkjr ljdkj ds isVªksfy;e vkSj izkÑfrd xSl ea=ky; dh vf/klwpuk la[;k dk-vk- 2222 rkjh[k 14 flrEcj] 2017 tks

Hkkjr ds jkti= dzekad 38] rkjh[k 17 flrEcj & 23 flrEcj 2017 esa izdkf'kr dh xbZ Fkh }kjk ml vf/klwpuk ls layXu

vuqlwph esa fofufnZ"V Hkwfe esa egkjk"Vª jkT; esa ftyk vgenuxj esa rkYkqdk jkgqjh dks;yh & vgenuxj & lksykiqj isVªksfy;e

ifjogu ds fy, bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZj'ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbZiykbZu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj ds vtZu

ds vius vk'k; dh ?kks"k.kk dh Fkh (

vkSj mä jkti= vf/kfu;e dh izfr;ka turk dks rkjh[k 14 flrEcj 2018 rd miyC/k djk nh xbZ Fkh (

vkSj l{ke izkf/kdkjh us mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ ds v/khu dsUæh; ljdkj dks fjiksVZ dh gS (

vkSj dsUæh; ljdkj us] mä fjiksVZ ij fopkj djus ds i'pkr~ vkSj ;g lek/kku gks tkus ij fd mä Hkwfe ikbZiykbZu fcNkus

ds fy, visf{kr gS] mlesa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu djus dk fofu'p; fd;k gS (

vr% vc] dsUæh; ljdkj mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk iznÙk 'kfä;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, ;g ?kks"k.kk

djrh gS fd bl vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa fofufnZ"V Hkwfe esa ikbZiykbZu fcNkus ds fy, mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu

fd;k tk, (

vkSj ljdkj mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi&/kkjk ¼4½ }kjk iznÙk 'kfä;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] ;g funsZ'k nsrh gS fd mä

Hkwfe esa mi;ksx dk vf/kdkj bl ?kks"k.kk ds izdk'ku dh rkjh[k ls dsUæh; ljdkj esa fufgr gksus ds ctk,] lHkh foYyaxeksa ls

eqä gksdj bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZj'ku fyfeVsM esa fufgr gksxh A

isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbZiykbZu vf/kfu;e] 1962 dh /kkjk 10 ds v/khu fdlh Hkh {kfriwfrZ ds fy, bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZj'ku

fyfeVsM iw.kZr;k mÙkjnk;h gksxh vkSj ikbZiykbZu ls lEcfU/kr fdlh Hkh ekeys ij dsUæh; ljdkj ds fo#) dksbZ okn nkok ;k

dkuwuh dk;Zokgh ugha gks ldsxhA

vuqlwPkh

rkyqdk%& jkgqjh

ftyk%& vgenuxj

jkT;%& egkjk"Vª

ekSts @xzke

losZ @ Cykd @ la-

¼IyksV la-½

lc&Mho&la-

{ks=Qy

gsDVj

vkj

oxZ ehVj

¼1½

¼2½

¼3½

¼4½

¼5½

¼6½

Ykk[k

10@4

117@2

118

119

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ekpZ 9] 2019@iQkYxqu 18] 1940

1031

¼1½

¼2½

¼3½

¼4½

¼5½

¼6½

Ykk[k

120

121

122

123

124@1

125

128

129

126

127

136

137@1

142

141

140@1

139@2@1

206@c@2@1

206@d@2

206@v@1@1@1

206@v@1@1@2

205@1@c

196@1@3

196@1@2@1

f=acdiqj

60@6

60@5

60@4

60@3

60@2

60@1

/kkeksjh cqnzqd

167@1

168@2

1+68@2@1

1+68@3

168@4

168@5

168@6

147

149

148@2@1

148@2@2

1032

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 9, 2019/PHALGUNA 18, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

¼1½

¼2½

¼3½

¼4½

¼5½

¼6½

/kkeksjh cqnzqd

148@1@2

127@1

126@1

125@1

125@2

80@1

[Qk- la- vkj&11025¼11½6@2018&vksvkj&I@bZ&23678]

'kkUruq /kj] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 25th February, 2019

S. O. 336.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural

Gas vide S.O. No. 2222 dated the 14^th September, 2017 issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and

Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (here in after referred to as the said

Act), Published in the Gazette of India, No.38 dated 17 – 23 September, 2017 the Central Government declared its

intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of

laying Koyali-Ahmednagar-Solapur Pipeline for the transportation of Petroleum Products in Taluka Rahuri in

Ahmadnagar District in the State of Maharashtra by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public up to 14 September 2018;

And whereas the competent authority has under sub-section (1) of Section 6 of said act submitted report to the

Central Government;

And Whereas the Central Government, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land

is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of user therein;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is

hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby directs that right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the Central

Government, vest on the date of publication of the declaration, in Indian Oil Corporation Limited, free from all

encumbrances.

Indian Oil Corporation Limited shall be exclusively liable for any compensation in terms of Section 10 of the P

& MP Act, 1962 and no suit, claim or legal proceeding would lie against the Central Government on any matter relating

to the pipeline.

SCHEDULE

Taluka:- Rahuri

District:- Ahmadnagar

State :- Maharashtra

Mouje / Village

Survey/Block No.

Sub-Div-No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

Lakh

10/4

117/2

118

119

120

121

122

123

124/1

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ekpZ 9] 2019@iQkYxqu 18] 1940

1033

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

Lakh

125

128

129

126

127

136

137/1

142

141

140/1

139/2/1

206/B/2/1

206/Ka/2

206/A/1/1/1

206/A/1/1/2

205/1/B

196/1/3

196/1/2/1

Trimbakpur

60/6

60/5

60/4

60/3

60/2

60/1

Dhamori Bk

167/1

168/2

168/2/1

168/3

168/4

168/5

168/6

147

149

148/2/1

148/2/2

148/1/2

127/1

126/1

125/1

125/2

80/1

[F. No. R-11025(11)6/2018-OR-I/E-23678]

SANTANU DHAR, Under Secy.

1034

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 9, 2019/PHALGUNA 18, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ubZ fnYyh] 25 Qjojh] 2019

dk-vk- 337-&dsUnzh; ljdkj us isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbZu ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½ vf/kfu;e]

1962 ¼1962 dk 50½ ¼ftls blesa blds i'pkr~ mä vf/kfu;e dgk x;k gSa½ dh /kkjk 3 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ ds v/khu tkjh dh

xbZ Hkkjr ljdkj ds isVªksfy;e vkSj izkÑfrd xSl ea=ky; dh vf/klwpuk la[;k dk-vk- 2225 rkjh[k 14 flrEcj] 2017 tks

Hkkjr ds jkti= Øekad 38] rkjh[k 17 flrEcj & 23 flrEcj 2017 esa izdkf'kr dh xbZ Fkh }kjk ml vf/klwpuk ls layXu

vuqlwph esa fofufnZ"V Hkwfe esa egkjk"Vª jkT; esa ftyk vgenuxj esa rkYkqdk uxj dks;yh & vgenuxj & lksykiqj isVªksfy;e

ifjogu ds fy, bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZj'ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbiykbZu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj ds vtZu

ds vius vk'k; dh ?kks"k.kk dh Fkh (

vkSj mä jkti= vf/kfu;e dh izfr;ka turk dks rkjh[k 25 vDVwcj 2018 rd miyC/k djk nh xbZ Fkh (

vkSj l{ke izkf/kdkjh us mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ ds v/khu dsUæh; ljdkj dks fjiksVZ dh gS (

vkSj dsUæh; ljdkj us] mä fjiksVZ ij fopkj djus ds i'pkr~ vkSj ;g lek/kku gks tkus ij fd mä Hkwfe ikbiykbZu fcNkus

ds fy, visf{kr gS] mlesa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu djus dk fofu'p; fd;k gS (

vr% vc] dsUæh; ljdkj mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk iznÙk 'kfä;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, ;g ?kks"k.kk

djrh gS fd bl vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa fofufnZ"V Hkwfe esa ikbiykbZu fcNkus ds fy, mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu

fd;k tk, (

vkSj ljdkj mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi&/kkjk ¼4½ }kjk iznÙk 'kfä;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] ;g funsZ'k nsrh gS fd mä

Hkwfe esa mi;ksx dk vf/kdkj bl ?kks"k.kk ds izdk”ku dh rkjh[k ls dsUæh; ljdkj esa fufgr gksus ds ctk,] lHkh foYyaxeksa ls

eqä gksdj bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZj'ku fyfeVsM esa fufgr gksxh A

isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbZu vf/kfu;e] 1962 dh /kkjk 10 ds v/khu fdlh Hkh {kfriwfrZ ds fy, bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZj'ku

fyfeVsM iw.kZr;k mÙkjnk;h gksxh vkSj ikbiykbZu ls lEcfU/kr fdlh Hkh ekeys ij dsUæh; ljdkj ds fo#) dksbZ okn nkok ;k

dkuwuh dk;Zokgh ugha gks ldsxhA

vuqlwPkh

rkyqdk%& uxj

ftyk%& vgenuxj

jkT;%& egkjk"Vª

ekSts @xzke

losZ @ Cykd @ la-

¼IyksV la-½

lc&Mho&la-

{ks=Qy

gsDVs;j

vkjs

oxZ ehVj

¼1½

¼2½

¼3½

¼4½

¼5½

¼6½

uÈc nsgsj

179

113

112@1@v@1@2

112@1@v@1@3

112@1@v@2

112@1@v@3

112@1@c

112@2

109@1@v

108@1

107@2@c@2

107@1

106@1$2@1

118@1

119

91@1

91@2

91@4@v

91@5

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ekpZ 9] 2019@iQkYxqu 18] 1940

1035

¼1½

¼2½

¼3½

¼4½

¼5½

¼6½

90@1@v

88@1@v

88@1@c

[Qk- la- vkj&11025¼11½6@2018&vksvkj&I@bZ&23678]

'kkUruq /kj] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 25th February, 2019

S. O. 337.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural

Gas vide S.O. No. 2225 dated the 14^th September, 2017 issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and

Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (here in after referred to as the said

Act), Published in the Gazette of India, No.38 dated 17 – 23 September, 2017 the Central Government declared its

intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of

laying Koyali-Ahmednagar-Solapur Pipeline for the transportation of Petroleum Products in Taluka Rahuri in

Ahmadnagar District in the State of Maharashtra by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public up to 25 October 2018;

And whereas the competent authority has under sub-section (1) of Section 6 of said act submitted report to the

Central Government;

And Whereas the Central Government, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land

is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of user therein;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is

hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby directs that right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the Central

Government, vest on the date of publication of the declaration, in Indian Oil Corporation Limited, free from all

encumbrances.

Indian Oil Corporation Limited shall be exclusively liable for any compensation in terms of Section 10 of the P

& MP Act, 1962 and no suit, claim or legal proceeding would lie against the Central Government on any matter relating

to the pipeline.

SCHEDULE

Taluka:- Nagar

District:- Ahmadnagar

State :- Maharashtra

Mouje / Village

Survey/Block No.

Sub-Div-No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

Nimb Dehere

179

113

112/1/A/1/2

112/1/A/1/3

112/1/A/2

112/1/A/3

112/1/B

112/2

109/1/A

108/1

107/2/B/2

107/1

106/1+2/1

1036

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 9, 2019/PHALGUNA 18, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

Nimb Dehere

118/1

119

91/1

91/2

91/4/A

91/5

90/1/A

88/1/A

88/1/B

[F. No. R-11025(11)6/2018-OR-I/E-23678]

SANTANU DHAR, Under Secy.

नई द ली, 1 माच?, 2019

का.आ.

का.आ. 338

338

338.—भारत सरकार के पेiोिलयम और (ाकृितक गैस मं<ालय क अिधसूचना संVया एस ओ 2 दनांक

28 दसंबर 2017 मA आंिशक संशोधन और पेiोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूिम मA उपयोग के अिधकार का अज?न)

अिधिनयम, 1962 (1962 का 50) क धारा 2 के ख@ड (क) के अनुसरण मA, 5ीमती भागवंती जेठवानी, (आर.ए.एस.)

राज8व अपील अिधकारी, कोटा के पदनाम को जो राज8थान राŒय मA भारत पेiोिलयम कॉप‡रेशन िलिमटेड क कोटा -

जोबनेर उ=पाद पाइपलाइन, बीना कोटा पाइपलाइन और मांगिलया (इंदौर) से िबजवासन (दली) तक मुंबई - मनमाड -

िबजवासन उ=पाद पाइपलाइन के िलए इस अिधिनयम के अंतग?त भूिम अवािƒ अिधकारी (स]म अिधकारी), के कायW को

अितIर+ काय?भार के Mप मA िनव?हन करने के िलए िनयुि+ को इस (कार पढ़ा जाए सेटलमAट अिधकारी के बदले राज8व

अपील अिधकारी, कोटा ।

[फा. सं. आर-12031/197/2017-ओआर-I@bZ&21538]

शा2तनु धर, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the1st March, 2019

S.O. 338.—In partial modification of notification of Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum &

Natural Gas S.O. 2 -, dated 28^thDecember 2017 and in pursuance of Clause(a) of Section 2 of The Petroleum & Minerals

Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), The designation of Smt. Bhagwanti

Jethwani,(RAS) Revenue Appellate Authority, Kota appointed to perform the functions of Competent Authority as an

additional charge under the said Act, for Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited’s Kota - Jobner Product Pipeline, Bina -

Kota Product Pipeline and Mumbai – Manmad - Bijwasan Product Pipeline from Mangliya (Indore) to Bijwasan (Delhi)

in the States of Rajasthan, may be read as “Revenue Appellate Authority, Kota” instead of “ Settlement Officer.”

[F. No. R-12031/197/2017-OR-I/E-21538]

SANTANU DHAR, Under Secy.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ekpZ 9] 2019@iQkYxqu 18] 1940

1037

/म एवं रोज

/म एवं रोजगार मं*ालय

गार मं*ालय

नई द ली, 14 फरवरी, 2019

का.आ.

का.आ. 339

339

339.—औŽोिगक िववाद अिधिनयम 1947 (1947 का 14) क धारा 17 के अनुसरण मA के2 3ीय सरकार

मेसस? (बंधन, नेशनल जूट मै2 युफै\ चरस? कॉप‡रेशन िलिमटेड धनबाद, और अ2 य एवं उनके कम?चारी के (बंधतं< के संब_

िनयोजक, और उनके कम?कार, के बीच अनुबंध मA िन`द?a ट औŽोिगक िववाद मA के2 3ीय सरकार औŽोिगक अिधकरण एवं 5म

2 यायालय, धनबाद, के पंचाट (संदभ? संV या 10/2014) को (कािशत करती है जो के2 3ीय सरकार को 1.02.19 को (ाe त 0ए

थे।

[सं. एल-42011/113/2013-आईआर (डीयू)]

राजA3 जोशी, उप िनदेशक

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

New Delhi, the 14th February, 2019

S.O. 339.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 10/2014) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum-Labour

Court Dhanbad, as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of National Jute Manufacturers Corporation Ltd. Dhanbad, and others, and their workmen which were

received by the central Government on 1.2.19.

[No.L- 42011/113/2013-IR (DU)]

RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1, DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference: No. 10/2014

Employer in relation to the management of National Jute Manufactures Co. Ltd

AND

Their workmen

Present : Shri D.K.Singh, Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers : None

For the workman : None

State : Jharkhand.

Industry-Textile

Dated : 30.01. 2019

AWARD

By order No. L-42011/113/2013-IR(DU) dated 05/02/2014, the central Government in the Ministry of Labour

has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub –section (1) and sub-section (2A) of section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of National Jute Manufacturers Corporation Ltd. is erroneous

in denying any wage –structure to its mill workmen/employees for such a long period and why should it

not do the same within a fixed time period”

2. After receipt of the reference, both parties were noticed but none of the parties appeared after issuance of notices. Case

is pending since long so, it is felt that parties have lost their interest to resolve the matter. Hence No Dispute Award is

passed. Communicate.

D. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer

1038

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 9, 2019/PHALGUNA 18, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

नई द ली, 14 फरवरी, 2019

का.आ.

का.आ. 340

340

340.—औŽोिगक िववाद अिधिनयम (1947 का 14) क धारा 17 के अनुसरण मA के23ीय सरकार मेसस?

आयु+, दली नगर िनगम, नई दली और अ2य एवं उनके कम?चारी के (बंधतं< के संब_ िनयोजक, और उनके कम?कार, के

बीच अनुबंध मA िन`द?† औŽोिगक िववाद मA के23ीय सरकार औŽोिगक अिधकरण एवं 5म 2यायालय -1, नई दली के पंचाट

(संदभ? संVया 11/2013) को (कािशत करती है जो के23ीय सरकार को 07.02.2019 को (ाƒ 0ए थे ।

[सं. एल-42011/118/2012-आईआर (डीयू)]

राजA3 जोशी, उप िनदेशक

New Delhi, the 14th February, 2019

S.O. 340.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 11/2013) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court-1 New Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the

Commissioner, Management of Municipal Corporation of Delhi, New Delhi & Others, and their workmen which were

received by the Central Government on 07.02.2019.

[No. L-42011/118/2012-IR (DU)]

RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR

COURT No.1: ROOM No.511, DWARKA COURT COMPLEX, NEW DELHI – 110 075

ID No. 11/2013

Shri Lalit Sharma,

S/o. late Shri Charanjeet Singh Sharma

through

Hospital Employees Union,

Agarwal Bhawan, GT Road,

Tis Hazari, Delhi 54.

…Workman

Versus

The Management of Municipal Corporation of Delhi,

Through its Commissioner,

Town Hall, Chandni Chowk, Delhi

(now known as Commissioner (North),

North Delhi Municipal Coirporation,

4^th Floor, SPM Civic Centre,

JL Nehru Marg,

New Delohi 110002.

… Management

AWARD

This award shall decide a reference which was made to this to this Tribunal by the appropriate Government vide

letter No. L-42011/221/2011/IR(DU) dated 28.12.2012 under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of

Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(in short the Act) for adjudication of an industrial dispute, terms of which

are as under:-

‘Whether the action of the management of Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) in not giving appointment

to Shri Lalit Sharma s/o. late Shri Charanjeet Singh Sharma on compassionate ground is legal and justified ? If

not, what relief the workman is entitled to ?’

Both parties were put to notice and the claimant Lalit Sharma filed his statement of claim with the averments

that his father late Shri Charanjeet Singh Sharma who had joined the management w.e.f.31?7/1976 as a TB Health

Visitor on regular basis, expired on 8/10/2014 leaving behind his widow Smt. Bhagwati, one married daughter Smt.

Vijay, two sons namely Lovliender and Lalit Sharma, as only legal heirs. The claimant Lalit Sharma had applied for

employment on compassionate ground after the demise of his father but his application was finally rejected vide order

dated 7/8/2007 on the ground that the family of the deceased was not found in distress/harness condition and also no post

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ekpZ 9] 2019@iQkYxqu 18] 1940

1039

is available. It is pleaded that the deceased workman was only bread earner of the family and after his death, the family

has reached to the verge of starvation. The claimant who has also successfully done TB Health Visitor Course, is eligible

for appointment on compassionate ground on any suitable post and he is totally unemployed. It is claimed that action of

the Management in denying appointment to the claimant is totally illegal, bad, unjust and malafide , in asmuch as in

similar circumstances, the dependents of other deceased employees have been given employment on compassionate

grounds. A demand notice dated 17/11/2008 was sent to the Management but no response. Thereafter conciliation

proceedings were also initiated but to no avail. Prayer has been made that Management be directed to give appointment

on compassionate ground to the claimant for any suitable post from retrospective date viz. the date of death of his father.

The statement of claim has been resisted by the Management who filed written statement and took preliminary

objections inter alia that the present dispute is not an Industrial Dispute as it is not espoused by the Union and as such,

same is bad in law. The applicants who claim for appointment on compassionate ground are not covered under the

definition of workman as provided under Section 2(s) of the Act and as such, the claimant has no right to claim the

appointment on compassionate ground by raising an Industrial Dispute. It is alleged that the as per rules & regulations

of the Govt. of India, no Govt. organization can make appointments on compassionate grounds beyond the fixed quota of

5 per cent and further that for compassionate appointment, family members of the deceased should be in distress. There

is very limited quota of 5 per cent for regular appointment on compassionate ground, whereas there is huge backlog of

such cases and those cases are examined by the Committee formulated for this purpose. The case of the claimant was

considered by the Committee who has observed that on account of lack of vacancies of TBHV under 5% quota, the

request of the claimant can not be considered and hence rightly rejected by the Committee. Prayer has been made for

dismissal of the claim petition.

Vide order dated 19/07/2013 my learned Predecessor framed following issues :-

Whether the dispute has not acquired status of industrial dispute for want of espousal ?

As in terms of reference ?

The workman /claimant examined himself as WW1 and led evidence by way of affidavit Ex.WW1/A & relied

on documents Ex.WW1/1 to Ex.WW1/24. Another witness Surender Bhardwaj was examined as WW2 who also

tendered his affidavit Ex.WW2/A and relied on the documents Ex.WW1/4. On the other hand, the Management

examined one Shri Sushil Chand Rustogi. Administrative Officer who filed his affidavit Ex.MW1/A and relied on the

documents Ex.MW1/1 to Ex.MW1/3.

I have heard Shri Rajiv Aggarwal, A/R of the claimant since none appeared on behalf of the Management to

address arguments. I have also gone through the records carefully.

Issue No.1 :-

According to the testimony of WW2 Surender Bhardwaj, Secretary of the Hospital Employees Union, the

claimant had approached the Union in September, 2008 and became member of the Union for redressal of his grievance.

He filed on record copy of the resolution passed in the meeting of the Union as Ex.WW1/4. He specifically deposed that

case of the workman was duly espoused by the Union. In cross examination he clarified that there are about 4000

members of the Hospital Employees Union which is recognized by the Management. He also deposed that Shri

Charanjit Singh – father of the claimant was a member of the Union.

Management has not led any evidence in rebuttal to show that the dispute of the claimant has not been espoused

by the Hospital Employees Union or that the said Union is not recognized one. However, MW1 Sushil

Chand Rustogi, Administrative Officer had admitted in his cross examination that Hospital Employees Union is one of

the largest Union of Health Workers of the MCD and same is recognized by the Management.

In view of the testimony of WW2 and document Ex.WW1/4, this Tribunal has no hesitation to hold that the

dispute raised by the claimant has been espoused by the Hospital Employees Union. Our own High Court in the case of

DDA Vs. Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal (W.P. –civil- No. 677/99 – decided on 12/2/2008) has held that a dispute

relating to compassionate appointment can be the subject matter of an industrial dispute. Accordingly, this issue is

decided against the Management & in favour of the claimant.

Issue No.2 :-

10.

From the pleadings of the parties and evidence adduced on record, it is evident that Shri Charanjit Sharma –

father of the claimant herein – was working as TB Health Visitor on regular/permanent basis with the Management and

was lastly posted as such at Gulabi Bagh Chest Clinic till his death i.e. upto 8/10/2004. He had rendered service of more

than 28 years with the Management. It is undisputed fact that the said Shri Charanjit Singh Sharma died during service

on 8/10/2004 and after his death, his son Lalit Sharma had applied for appointment on compassionate grounds vide

application on prescribed proforma Ex.MW1/3 for the post of TB Health Visitor (a class III post). It is also not in

dispute that application of the claimant was duly considered by the Management but was rejected by its Committee vide

its minutes dated 19/6/2007, copy of which has been filed on record as Ex.MW1/1. The claimant was informed about the

same vide communication/letter Ex.MW1/2.

11.

It is fairly settled that at present, appointment on compassionate grounds can not be claimed as a matter of right

as the availability of appointment and opportunities are limited. The Authority has its discretion to make a

compassionate appointment and/or to grant ex-gratia payment in lieu of employment on compassionate grounds, but the

said discretion should be exercised judiciously. The Apex Court in the matter of Sushma Gosain & others Vs. UOI,

1040

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 9, 2019/PHALGUNA 18, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1989 SCC (L&S) 662 SC has held that the appointment on compassionate ground is to mitigate the hardship due to the

death of bread earner in the family and such appointment should be made on regular basis in proper pay scale.

12.

A vital question arises for consideration is whether the Management exercised its discretion in declining the

request of the claimant herein for appointment on compassionate grounds judiciously or not. For this purpose, it would

be worthwhile to refer to the evidence adduced on record.

13.

The testimony of the claimant is in line with the averments made in the statement of claim. He deposed that he

had approached the Management number of times for getting employment on compassionate ground but the

Management kept postponing his request on the ground of insufficient vacancy and finally rejected his application vide

order dated 7/8/2007 on the ground that family of the deceased was not in distress/harness condition and also no post is

available.

14.

MW1 Shri Sushil Chand Rustogi has admitted that as per record the claimant was/is a post graduate and was

also having a diploma in Computer Application as well as in TB HV Course. He clarified that the claimant’s family was

living in the municipal accommodation and was not having any residential house of their own. While admitting the fact

that policy of compassionate appointment was based on point system, MW1 could not tell as to how many points were

given to the claimant and other 98 applicants. He admitted that appointment on compassionate ground was not given to

the claimant as there was no vacant post for the same. This witness also admitted that in case there is no vacant post

(in any field) and the candidate for compassionate appointment is found fit & suitable, then his case is kept pending for

consideration for the next time vacancy. He also admitted that in Health Department, the post of TB Health Visitor is

lying vacant since 2004 till date. On the basis of record he deposed that the claimant was not offered any other suitable

job/post, keeping in view his qualification.

15.

It is worthwhile to mention here that vide communication/letter dated 7/8/2007 (Ex.MW1/3) of the

Management, it was conveyed to the claimant herein that his application has been rejected by the Competent Authority

on the ground that the family of the deceased was not in distress/harness condition and also no post is available.

However, it is apparent from the document Ex.MW1/1 i.e. minutes of the Committee of the Management that there is no

finding of the Committee that the family of the deceased was not in distress/harness condition. The Committee has

simply observed that on account of lack of sufficient vacancy of TBHV (TB Health Visitor) under 5% quota, the

applicant who has applied for the post of TBHV, his request can not be considered and hence the case may be rejected.

It is not the case of the Management that the family of the deceased was not in distress/harness condition, or that

the claimant was not at all found suitable for the post of TBHV or any other suitable post which was lying vacant

at that time, keeping in view his educational qualifications. As mentioned above, MW1 – sole witness of the

Management has conceded that in Health Department, the post of TB Health Visitor is lying vacant since 2004 till date

and that the claimant was not offered any other suitable job/post, In reply to the RTI application moved by WW2

Surender Bhardwaj, the office of MCD vide reply dated 30/9/2010 (Ex.WW1/20) has informed that 8 Nos. of posts of

TBHVs are lying vacant as on April, 2010 under the office of Addl. DHA (TB). It is also crystal clear from the

document Ex.WW1/21 (reply to the RTI application of Surender Bhardwaj furnished by MCD on 16/7/2010) that the

name of applicant Lalit Sharma was not considered for any other class-III post.

16.

In view of the above discussion, it emerges that although the claimant herein in view of his qualification was

eligible for appointment on compassionate ground to the post of TB Health Visitor, however, the Committee of the

Management has rejected the application of the claimant herein only for lack of sufficient vacancy of TB Health

Visitor. Even if it is assumed and admitted that there was no sufficient vacancy of TB Health Visitor at the given point

of time when the application of the claimant herein was considered by the Screening Committee of MCD, in that

eventuality also it was moral and legal obligation on the part of the Management to consider and offer the claimant for

any suitable post lying vacant at that time or subsequent thereto but nothing of the sort has been done by the

Management for the reasons best known to it. As mentioned above, the office of MCD vide its reply dated 30/9/2010

under RTI Act (Ex.WW1/20) has conveyed that 8 Nos. of posts of TBHVs are lying vacant as on April, 2010 under the

office of Addl. DHA (TB).

17.

Having regard to the overall facts and circumstances of the case, as discussed above, this Tribunal is of the

considered view that the action of the Management in not giving appointment to the claimant for any suitable post on

compassionate ground is neither legal nor justified.

Relief :-

18.

As a sequel to the aforesaid discussion, the Management is directed to give appointment to the claimant Lalit

Sharma on compassionate ground, for the post of TB Health Visitor or any other suitable clerical post keeping in view

his educational qualification, within two months, from the date of publication of this Award. The Award is passed

accordingly.

Date : 01.02.2019

AVTAR CHAND DOGRA, Presiding Officer

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ekpZ 9] 2019@iQkYxqu 18] 1940

1041

नई द ली, 14 फरवरी, 2019

का.अस.

का.अस. 341

341

341.—औŽोिगक िववाद अिधिनयम 1947 (1947 का 14) क धारा 17 के अनुसरण मA के2 3ीय

सरकार मेसस? (बंधन, भारत संचार िनगम िलिमटेड धनबाद, और अ2 य एवं उनके कम?चारी के (बंधतं< के संब_ िनयोजक,

और उनके कम?कार, के बीच अनुबंध मA िन`द?a ट औŽोिगक िववाद मA के2 3ीय सरकार औŽोिगक अिधकरण एवं 5म 2 यायालय,

धनबादक के पंचाट (संदभ? संV या 59/2015) को (कािशत करती है जो के2 3ीय सरकार को 7.2.19 को (ाe त 0ए थे।

[सं. एल-40012/51/2015-आईआर (डीयू)]

राजA3 जोशी, उप िनदेशक

New Delhi, the 14th February, 2019

S.O. 341.—In pursucance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 59/2015) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court Dhanbad, as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited Dhanbad, and others, and their workmen which were received by the

Central Government on 7.2.19.

[No. L-40012/51/2015-IR (DU)]

RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1, DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947

Reference: No. 59/2015

Employer in relation to the management of BSNL, Dhanbad

AND

Their workman

Present : Shri D.K.Singh, Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers : Sri Bishal Kumar, A.O, Legal

For the workman. : None

State : Jharkhand.

Industry- Telecom

Dated- 30.01. 2019

AWARD

By order No. L-40012/51/2015-IR(DU) dated 19/11/2015, the central Government in the Ministry of Labour

has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub –section (1) and sub-section (2A) of section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Dhanbad in not regularizing the

service of Shri Rahul Paswan as alleged by him is legal and justified ? If not, what relief the workman is

entitled to and which date?”

2. This Case is received from the Ministry on 04.12.2015. After receipt of the reference, both parties were noticed and

during the pendency of the case, Ld. Counsel of the workman has informed that workman has not been interested in

contesting the case. It is felt that the workman has lost his interest to resolve the matter. Hence “No dispute” award is

passed. communicate.

D.K.SINGH, Presiding Officer

1042

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 9, 2019/PHALGUNA 18, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

नई द ली, 14 फरवरी, 2019

का.आ.

का.आ. 342

342

342.—औŽोिगक िववाद अिधिनयम 1947 (1947 का 14) क धारा 17 के अनुसरण मA के23ीय सरकार

मेसस? अkय] और (बंध िनदेशक, एमएमटीसी िलिमटेड, नई दली और अ2य एवं उनके कम?चारी के (बंधतं< के संब_

िनयोजक, और उनके कम?कार, के बीच अनुबंध मA िन`द?† औŽोिगक िववाद मA के23ीय सरकार औŽोिगक अिधकरण एवं 5म

2यायालय-1, नई दली के पंचाट (संदभ? संVया 74/2014) को (कािशत करती है जो के23ीय सरकार को 07.2.2019 को

(ाƒ 0ए थे।

[सं. एल-42011/49/2014-आईआर (डीयू)]

राजA3 जोशी, उप िनदेशक

New Delhi, the 14th February, 2019

S.O. 342.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 74/2014) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court-1, New Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the

Chairman and Managing Director, Management of MMTC Ltd , New Delhi and others, and their workmen which were

received by the Central Government on 07.02.2019.

[No. L-42011/49/2014-IR (DU)]

RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

IN THE COURT OF SHRI AVTAR CHAND DOGRA : PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT No. 1, DWARKA COURTS COMPLEX : NEW DELHI

ID No. 74/2014

MMTC Employees Union (Regd.),

Through its General Secretary,

Scope Complex, Core No.1,

Institutional Area, Lodhi Road,

New Delhi 110003.

…Workman/Claimant

Versus

The Management of MMTC Ltd.

Through its Chairman and Managing Director,

Scope Complex,

New Delhi 110003.

…Management/ Respondent

AWARD

This Award shall dispose of a reference which was made to this Tribunal by the Appropriate Government vide

letter No.L-42011/49/2014/IR(DU) dated 05.08.2014 under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section

10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(in short the Act) for adjudication of an industrial dispute, terms of which are as

under:-

‘Whether deduction of difference of payment of leave encashment w.e.f. 1/4/2004 in the tune of order of

Ministry of Commerce and Industry No.6/4/2008-FT/M&O) dated 1/3/2013 in respect of workman/staff of

MMTC by the Management of MMTC is just, fair and legal ? If not, what relief the workmen concerned are

entitled to ?’

Both parties were put to notice and Workmen Union filed its statement of claim, with the averments that it

represents class III and IV employees working in the Management Corporation. The workmen have been availing the

facility of leave encashment, reckoning a month of 26 days instead of 30 days as per MMTC Encashment of Earned

Leave Rules, 1976, duly approved by the Board of Directors of the Corporation. In March, 1993 an amendment in the

aforesaid Rules, 1976 was made so as to treat a month of 26 days instead of 30 days for the purpose of leave encashment.

Similar practice of reckoning a month of 26 days instead of 30 days for the purpose of leave encashment is prevailing in

other Public Sector Units like HAL, HMT, BSNL etc. Even in the Payment of Gratuity Act and Payment of Bonus Act,

a month a reckoned as 26 days in lieu of 30 days so as to make voluntary retirement scheme to be more effective. Such a

practice was going on smoothly without any hitch since 1993 till 2004, as in the year 2004 when CAG raised audit

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ekpZ 9] 2019@iQkYxqu 18] 1940

1043

objection about reckoning 26 days as a month instead of 30 days for the purpose of leave encashment, the Board of the

Directors of the Management Corporation ratified reckoning of 26 days a month, duly approving the same in its 331^st

meeting held on 5^th July, 2005 retrospectively from 18/3/1993. On the basis of a communication dated 11/12/2008

issued by Department of Public Enterprises, stating that the Central Public Sector Undertakings should adopt 30 days a

month for the purpose of leave encashment, the Management Corporation issued an office order dated 9/1/2009, thereby

amending the Encashment of Earned Leave Rules, 1976 w.e.f. 1/1/2009 thereby reckoning a month as 30 days instead of

26 days for the said purpose. However, on 6^th May, 2013 Management Corporation issued an office order for recovery

of excess amount of leave encashment from employees on the roll of the company as on 1/4/2013 during the period from

1/4/2004 to 31/3/2008 reckoning a month of 26 days instead of 30 days. It is alleged that the said order dated 6/5/2013

of the Management is unjust, unfair and illegal. Even Ministry of Commerce & Industry sent a letter dated 1^st./3^rd April,

2013 asking the Management Corporation to recover the excess expenditure incurred at least in respect of the Officers

who are still in service with MMTC. The Workmen Union sent a letter dated 10/5/2013 to the Management Corporation

seeking to quash the impugned order of recovery of the amount from the salaries of the workmen. Thereafter the

Workmen Union approached the Conciliation Officer but to no avail. It is alleged that change in service conditions by

executive orders should always be prospective and not retrospective. The amendment sought to be brought w.e.f.

1/1/2009 vide impugned office order dated 9/1/2009 had not got the approval of the Board of Directors of the

Management Corporation at any point of time. It is also alleged t\hat since the recovery in terms of the impugned order

is to be effected from the employees on the roll of company as on 1/3/2013, two categories of employees viz. first who

availed leave encashment facility as per old ruloe upto 31/3/2008 but superannuated before 1/4/2013 and second those

who availed such facility in the old rule upto 31/3/2008 but superannuated between 1/4/2013 till 5/6/2013 escaped from

recovery and same is discriminatory and in conflict with the interest of workmen who0 are still working. Prayer has

been made that deduction of difference of payment of leave encashment w.e.f. 1/4/2004 in the tune of order of Ministry

of Commerce & Industry dated 1/3/2013 in respect of workmen Union is unjust, unfair and illegal and directions be

given to the Management Corporation to refrain from making such deductions from the salary of the workmen of the

Union.

Management has resisted the claim of the Workman and filed written statement, thereby denying the allegations

as made in the claim petition. It is alleged that in the instant case the Govt. audit party as well as Ministry of Commerce

& Industry have issued express instructions for restoration of encashment provision based on 30 days reckoning a month

in lieu of 26 days which has force of law in view of the specific provisions of MMTC Service Regulations, 1976 which

has superseding effect of Fundamental Rules & Supplementary Rules wherever service regulations are not clear. It is

also alleged that impugned order does not provide any categorization of the workmen, as it simply provided that the

employees those who are on rolls of the company as on 1/4/2013 are liable to pay excess amount already paid towards

leave encashment for the period from 1/4/2004 to 31/3/2008. As such, there is no arbitrariness so far as cut off date of

1/4/2013 is concerned. Prayer has been made for dismissal of the claim petition.

Rejoinder was filed on behalf of the workmen Union, whereby the case as set up in the claim petition has been

reiterated and allegations made in the written statement have been denied.

Vide order dated 11/2/2016 my learned Predecessor observed that no specific issue is required to be framed

except the subject matter of reference and as such parties were called upon to adduce their respective evidence.

The Workmen Union in support of its case examined two witnesses namely WW1 Shri Naresh Vij who

tendered his affidavit Ex.WW1/A & relied on the documents Ex.WW1/1 to Ex.WW1/16, and Shri Udai Vir Singh who

also filed his evidence by way of affidavit Ex.WW2/A, whereas Management examined one Shri VSN Rao, Addl.

General Manager (P), who tendered his evidence by way of affidavit Ex.MW1/A.

I have heard Shri K.P. Rao, A/R for the Workmen Unioin and Ms.Manvi, A/R for the Management and have

gone through the records carefully.

From the pleadings of the parties and evidence adduced on record, it is manifest that the Management reckoned

a month of 26 days instead of 30 days for the purposes of leave encashment to its employees/workmen herein, since

1993 to 2004. Although an audit objection was raised by CAG in 2004 about reckoning a month of 26 days instead of

30 days, however the Board of Directors of the Management Corporation ratified in 2005 to consider 26 days instead of

30 days in a month for the purpose of leave encashment to its employees retrospectively from March, 1993 as per

directives of Administrative Ministry. It is also not in dispute that on the basis of a communication dated 11/12/2008

issued by Department of Public Enterprises issued to all the Central Public Sector Undertakings, thereby advising to

adopt 30 days a month for the purpose of leave encashment, the Management Corporation issued an office order dated

9/1/2009 (Ex.WW1/5), thereby amending the Encashment of Earned Leave Rules, 1976 w.e.f. 1/1/2009 thereby

reckoning a month as 30 days instead of 26 days for the said purpose. The Workmen Union vide representation dated

15/1/2009 (Ex.WW1/6) requested the Management to keep the aforesaid order dated 9/1/2009 (Ex.WW1/5) in abeyance.

Pursuant to the communication dated 1^st/3^rd April, 2013 (Ex.WW1/7) received from Ministry of Commerce & Industry,

an office order dated 6/5/2013 (Ex.WW1/8) was issued by the Management Corporation for effecting recovery of excess

amount of leave encashment from employees on the roll of the company as on 1/4/2013 during the period from 1/4/2004

to 31/3/2008 reckoning a month of 26 days instead of 30 days.

Short controversy involved in the matter is whether action of the Management to effect recovery of excess

amount from the employees on the roll of the company as on 1/4/2013 in respect of leave encashment, due to reckoning a

month of 26 days instead of 30 days during the period 1/4/2004 to 31/3/2008, is just and legal.

1044

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 9, 2019/PHALGUNA 18, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

10.

It is fairly settled that orders passed by the employer/Management Corporation seeking recovery of monetary

benefits wrongly extended to employees can be interfered with, in case where such recovery would result in a hardship

of a nature which would far outweigh, the equitable balance of the employer’s right to recover. In other words,

interference would be called for only in such case where it would be iniquitous to recover the payment made. Hon’ble

Supreme Court in the case of State of Punjab and others Vs. Rafiq Masih (White Washer) etc., AIR 2015 SC 696 in

respect of leave encashment, due to reckoning a month of 26 days instead of 30 days has observed that :-

“…An action of the State, ordering a recovery from an employee, would be in order, so long as it is not

rendered iniquitous to the extent that the action of recovery would be more unfair, more wrongful, more

improper and more unwarranted, than the corresponding right of the employer, to recover the amount. Or in

other words, till such time as the recovery would have a harsh and arbitrary effect on the employee, it would be

permissible in law…”

11.

Present dispute has been raised by the Workmen Union on behalf of class III and IV employees working in the

Management Corporation. Perusal of the record shows that the employees/workmen herein had neither any role in the

determination of the amount payable or paid to them towards encashment of leave, nor there was any fraud or

misrepresentation at the behest of the employees, rather same was paid to them as per the Scheme/Bye-Rules for

Encashment Earned Leave (Ex.WW1/1 & Ex.WW1/2) framed by the Management Corporation in the year 1993. As

mentioned above, the impugned order Ex.WW1/8 for effecting recovery of excess amount paid in respect of leave

encashment was issued only on 6/5/2013 and the amount sought to be recovered was in respect of excess payments made

during the period 1/4/2004 to 31^st March, 2008. To be precise, the recovery sought to be effected from the Workmen

Union was after five years of the payment so made to the employees and this Tribunal can not loose sight of the fact that

the recovery from class II and III employees being in lower rung of service, would result in extreme hardships to them.

Examining a similar proposition the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Col.B.J. Akkara Vs. Government of India,

JT 2006 (9) SC 125 observed as under :-

“28.Such relief, restraining back recovery of excess payment, is granted by Courts not because of any right in

the employees but in equity, in exercise of judicial discretion to relief the employees from the hardship that will

be caused if recovery if implemented. A government servant, particularly one in the lower rungs of service

would spend whatever emoluments he receives for the upkeep of his family. If he receives an excess

payment for a long period, he would spend it, genuinely believing that he is entitled to it. As any

subsequent action to recover the excess payment will cause undue hardship to him, relief is granted in

that behalf. But where the employee had knowledge that the payment received was in excess of what was

due or wrongly paid, or where the error is detected or corrected within a short time of wrong payment,

courts will not grant relief against recovery. The matter being in the realm of judicial discretion, courts

may on the facts & circumstance of any particular case refuse to grant such relief against recovery…”

Attention of this Tribunal was drawn by learned A/R for the Claimant to the communication dated 1^st/3^rd April, 2017

(Ex.WW1/7) issued by Ministry of Commerce & Industry (Department of Commerce) to the Chairman-cum-Managing

Director of MMTC Ltd. regarding recovery of excess expenditure incurred due to incorrect regulation of leave

encashment at least in respect of the Officers who are still in service. On the strength of this communication, learned

A/R for the claimant submitted that the Ministry itself desired that recovery in respect of excess payment of leave

encashment be made from the Officers who are still in service and not from the employees belonging to class-III and

class-IV service of the Management Corporation, whom the Workmen Union represent.

12.

In the case of State of Punjab and others Vs. Rafiq Masih (supra), wherein a similar question regarding

recovery of excess payment from the employees where payments having been made mistakenly by the employer in

excess of entitlement of the employees had arisen, Hon’ble Supreme Court after referring to number of its earlier

decisions, observed as under :-

“18. It is not possible to postulate all situations of hardship which would govern employees on the issue of

recovery, where payments have mistakenly been made by the employer, in excess of their entitlement. Be that

as it may, based on the decisions referred to herein above, we may, as a ready reference, summarises the

following few situations, wherein recoveries by the employers would be impermissible in law :-

(i)

Recovery from employees belonging to class-III and class-IV service (or Group-C and Group-D

service).

(ii)

Recovery from retired employees, or employees who are due to retire within one year, of the order of

recovery.

(iii)

Recovery from employees when the excess payment has been made for a period in excess of five

years, before the order of recovery is issued

(iv)

Recovery in cases where an employee has wrongfully been required to discharge duties of a higher

post, and has been paid accordingly even though he should have rightfully been required to work

against an inferior post.

(v)

In any other case, where the Court arrive s at the conclusion that recovery if made from the employee,

would be iniquitous or harsh or arbitrary to such an extent, as would far outweigh the equitable balance

of the employer’s right to recover.”

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ekpZ 9] 2019@iQkYxqu 18] 1940

1045

Having regard to the legal position as discussed above, this Tribunal is of the considered view that the case of the

workmen Union herein undisputedly falls within first four categories, inasmuchas the workmen from whom the recovery

sought to be effected in terms of order dated 6/5/2013 belong to class-III and class IV (group-C and D) service and

further, recovery of excess payment of leave encashment relates to the period 1/4/2004 to 31/3/2008 i.e. in respect of the

period five years prior to passing of the impugned order. Furthermore, the employees/workmen herein had neither any

role in the determination of the amount payable or paid to them towards encashment of leave, nor there was any fraud or

misrepresentation at the behest of the employees and on the contrary, payments of leave encashment was made to the

employees as per the Scheme/Bye-Rules for Encashment Earned Leave (Ex.WW1/1 & Ex.WW1/2).

13.

As a sequel to the overall facts & circumstances of the case and rulings as discussed above, this Tribunal has no

hesitation to hold that action of the Management Corporation in effecting recovery of leave encashment w.e.f. 1/4/2004

to 31/3/2008 from employees of class-III and IV service in terms of impugned order dated 6/5/2013, based on the order

dated 1/3/2013 of Ministry of Commerce & Industry, is unjust and illegal. Accordingly, the Management Corporation is

restrained from effecting recovery of excess payment of leave encashment from class II and IV service as neither the

claimants herein had any role in the determination of the amount payable or paid to them towards encashment of leave,

nor there was any fraud or misrepresentation at the behest of the employees. The award is passed accordingly.

Date : 01.02.2019

AVTAR CHAND DOGRA, Presiding Officer

नई द ली, 14 फरवरी, 2019

का.आ.

का.आ. 343

343

343.—औŽोिगक िववाद अिधिनयम 1947 (1947 का 14) क धारा 17 के अनुसरण मA के23ीय सरकार

मेसस? आयु\ त, द ली नगर िनगम, नई द ली और अ2य एवं उनके कम?चारी के (बंधतं< के संब_ िनयोजक, और उनके

कम?कार, के बीच अनुबंध मA िन`द?† औŽोिगक िववाद मA के23ीय सरकार औŽोिगक अिधकरण एवं 5म 2यायालय-1, नई

दली के पंचाट (संदभ? संVया 297/2011) को (कािशत करती है जो के23ीय सरकार को 07.2.2019 को (ाƒ 0ए थे।

[सं. एल-42011/14/2011-आईआर (डीयू)]

राजA3 जोशी, उप िनदेशक

New Delhi, the 14th February, 2019

S.O. 343.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 297/2011) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court-1 New Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the

Commissioner, Management of Municipal Corporation of Delhi, New Delhi and others, and their workmen which were

received by the Central Government on 07.02.2019.

[No. L-42011/14/2011-IR (DU)]

RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR

COURT No.1: ROOM No. 511, DWARKA COURT COMPLEX, NEW DELHI – 110 075

ID No. 297/11

Shri Satish Kumar and 8 others,

Safai Karamcharis,

Lastly posted at Circle No.30, Tikri Kalan,

Najafgarh Zone, New Delhi.

Through General Secretary,

Municipal Employees Union,

Agarwal Bhawan, GT Road,

Tis Hazari, Delhi 110054.

… Workman

1046

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 9, 2019/PHALGUNA 18, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Versus

The Management of Municipal Corporation of Delhi,

Through its Commissioner,

Town Hall, Chandni Chowk, Delhi

presently at Dr.SP Mukherjee Civil Centre,

JL Nehru Marg, New Delhi 110002.

… Management

AWARD

This award shall decide a reference which was made to this to this Tribunal by the appropriate Government vide

letter No.L-42011/14/2011/IR(DU) dated 05.08.2011 under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section

10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(in short the Act) for adjudication of an industrial dispute, terms of which are as

under:-

‘Whether the action of the management Municipal Corporation of Delhi in denying the services of 9 substitute

Safai Karamcharies – S/shri Satish, Somvir, Rajbir, Smt. Manuju, Smt.Dayawati, smt. Savita, Smt., Rakhi and

Ms. Meenakshi and termination of their services with effect from 23/11/2008 is legal & justified ? What relief

the workman are entitled to ?’

Both parties were put to notice and the claimants/workman Satish and 8 others filed their joint statement of

claim with the averments that they had joined the Management as Adhoc Leave Substitute Safai Karamchari through

Employment Exchange, during the period between February, 2007 to August, 2008 as detailed in para 1 of the statement

of claim. It is pleaded that although they used to perform their duties continuously and uninterruptedly, yet they were

designated as a Adhoc Leave Substitute Safai Karamchari and were being treated as a daily rated/casual/muster roll

workers. They were being paid fixed/revised wages from time to time under the Minimum Wages Act while their

counterparts doing the identical work were being paid salary in proper pay scale and allowances besides other facilities

like uniform, earned leave, casual eave etc. The workmen have unblemished record of services to their credit.

Although the services of the workman ought to have been regularized by the Management, however their services were

terminated arbitrarily and illegally w.e.f. 23/11/2008 without assigning any reason and without issuing any notice or

payment of notice pay or without issuing any charge sheet. The Management has also not displayed any seniority list at

the time of termination of their services. Termination of services of the workman is in violation of Section 25-F, G and

H of the Act and it amounts to unfair labour practice as provided in Section 2(ra) and 25-U of the Act. It is also pleaded

that the workmen have acquired the status of a permanent employee from the date of the initial date of their joining into

the employment of the Management, after completing 90 days of continuous service as provided in the Model Standing

Orders framed under the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946. Even otherwise, the workmen have

acquired the status of permanent employees after completing 240 days of continuous employed and are deemed to have

been taken into employment on regular basis. The workmen are unemployed since the date of their termination w.e.f.

23/11/2008. A demand notice dated 19/1/2009 was sent to the Management but to no response. Thereafter conciliation

proceedings were initiated which resulted into failure due to non cooperative attitude of the Management. Prayer has

been made for their reinstatement into service with full back wages & all consequential benefits.

The statement of claim has been resisted by the Management who filed written statement and took preliminary

objections that the claim is not maintainable inasmuch claimants were simply working as Substitute Safai Karamcharis,

that is to say that they were engaged as and when any regular Safai Karamchari absented from duty or proceeded on

leave, as the work of sanitation can not be put on hold or postponed. Their engagement was for a specific short period

and is covered by the provisions of Section 2(oo)(bb) of the Act. The engagement of the claimants was subject to

availability of the work and as such question of retrenchment termination does not arise. It is alleged that the

Management corporation has its own policy of regularization i.e. in the phased manner and availability of the funds and

post only for the working daily wagers having continuous service of not less than 240 days in each calendar year. While

denying allegations of the workmen/claimants regarding illegal termination, it has been pleaded that as per norms only a

list of 2500 substitute safai Karamcharis could be maintained in Nazafgarh Zone but when found that a list with excess

persons was being maintained in the said Zone, the same was scrapped by Deputy Commissioner vide order dated

31/10/2008 and later on a consolidated list of excess persons of 10393 was scrapped by the Management vide order

dated 2/6/2009. It has been denied that there has been violation of provisions of Section 25-F, G and H of the Act.

Prayer has been made for dismissal of the claim petition.

Vide order dated 22/12/2011 my learned Predecessor observed that no other issue than those referred for the

adjudication is made out and hence parties were called upon to lead their evidence.

The workmen /claimants examined themselves as WW1 to WW9 and tendered their evidence by way of

affidavits Ex.WW1/A to Ex.WW9/A & relied on number of documents. They also examined one Shri Surender

Bhardwaj, General Secretary of the Municipal Employees Union as WW10 regarding espousal of the dispute of the

workmen herein by the Union, pursuant to resolution dated 3/1/2009 (copy Ex.W1/22) passed in the meeting of the

Union.

On the other hand, the Management examined one Shri Jai Kishan Taank. Sanitation Superintendent who filed

his affidavit Ex.MW1/A and relied on the documents Ex.MW1/1 to Ex.MW1/9.

I have heard Shri Rajiv Aggarwal, A/R for the claimants and Shri Rajiv Bhardwaj, A/R for the Management. I

have also gone through the records carefully.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ekpZ 9] 2019@iQkYxqu 18] 1940

1047

Ld. AR appearing on behalf of the Management strongly contended that there is no relationship of employer

and employee between the Management & claimant, nor the claimants have completed 240 days of service in a calendar

year, preceding to their alleged termination. As such, provisions of Section 25-F of the Act are not applicable to the case

in hand. It was also contended that onus is also upon the claimant/s to prove that he/she was in the employment of the

Management and has completed more than 240 days in a calendar year.

Per contra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Claimants submitted that the claimants were engaged in

phases by the Management in the year 2007 and their services were terminated at one go on 23/11/2008 abruptly

without issuing any notice and without payment of any compensation in lieu of notice period despite the fact that most of

them had completed more than 240 days of their service. It was submitted that action of the Management in terminating

the services of the claimants is unwarranted and illegal.

10.

There is no dispute about preposition of law that onus to prove that claimant was in the employment of

Management is always on the workman/claimant and it is for the workman to adduce evidence to prove factum of her

employment with the Management Bank. Such evidence may be in form of receipt of salary or wages for 240 days or

record of his/her appointment or engagement for that year to show that he/she has worked with the employer for 240

days or more in a Calendar year. In this regard, reference may be made to Batala Coop. Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. Sowaran

Singh, (2005) 8 Supreme Court Cases 481 as well as Director Fisheries Terminated Division Vs. Bhikubhai

Meghajibhai Gavda (2012) 1 SCC 47.

11.

There is hardly any dispute with the preposition of law as propounded in the aforesaid case. However, as per

written statement/reply filed by the Management, engagement of the claimants as Substitute Safai Karamcharis is not in

dispute. From the pleadings of the parties and evidence adduced on record, it is evident that the claimants/workmen

were working as Substitute Safai Karamcharis with the Management. Their services were terminated/disengaged with

effect from 23/11/2008. According to the case of the claimants, they were respectively appointed on the following

dates :-

Sl. No.

Name & father’s name of the claimant

Date of appointment

Shri Satish s/o. Dalip Singh

14-05-2007

Shri Sombir s/o. Sheesh Pal

13-8-2008

Shri Gopal s/o. Shri Ram Kumar

October, 2007

Shri Rajbgir s/o. Brahm Singh

19-04-2007

Smt. Manju w/o. Shri Ashok

15-12-2007

Smt. Dayawati w/o. Shri Krishan Kumar

March, 2007

Smt. Savita w/o. Shri Rajinder

February, 2007

Ms. Meenakshi d/o.Umed Singh

April, 2007

Smt. Rakhi w/o. Shri Rajesh Kumar

July, 2007.

12.

MW1 Shri Jai Kishan Taank - sole witness of the Management though filed on record documents Ex.MW1/1 to

Ex.MW1/9 viz. attendance sheet of the workmen/claimants herein but clarified that the same were not prepared by him.

These attendance sheets Ex.MW1/1 to Ex.MW1/0 show that four workmen Sombir, Raakhi, Satish and Rajbir had

worked for 260 days, 375 days, 342 days and 458 days respectively, whereas other five workmen/claimants namely

Dayawati, Minakshi, Gopal, Manju and Savita had worked for 81 days, 57 days, 129 days, 10 days and 123 days

respectively in the year 2007-2008. This witness showed his ignorance if the date of joining of the workmen as

mentioned in para 1 of the statement of claim (viz. as also reproduced above) is correct or not. He admitted that he had

neither seen muster roll of the workmen from their initial date of appointment till 23/11/2008 , nor had brought the same.

This witness could not tell details of employees in whose place the workmen/claimants were engaged. He admitted that

the Management maintains seniority list of regular daily wage/muster roll employees but not of leave substitute safai

Karamcharis. Though on 11/12/2015 this witness had taken time for production of Seniority List of regular daily

wager/muster roll employees, list of vacant post from 2007 to 2010, but he failed to produce the same despite the fact

that he was afforded number of opportunities and ultimately on 20/7/2017 he produced on record Select List of

Substitute Safai Karamcharis of Najafgarh Zone in order of merit, as Ex.MW1/1W-1. He admitted that the Management

had appointed Safai Karamcharis in the year 2009. He also admitted that the Management initially appoints Safai

Karamcharis on muster roll and they are subsequently regularized as per policy of the Management according to their

seniority. He further admitted that no appointment letter was issued to the claimants to show that they were being

engaged for a specific period for a specific work. Denying the suggestion that the claimants worked continuously and

uninterruptedly from their initial date of joining till 23/11/2008, he admitted that the Management had struck off the

names of the claimants from 23/11/2008, without conducting any enquiry. He could not say if co-employees of the

claimants are still working with the Management as regular employees or whether the employees mentioned in the list

Ex.MW1/W-1 were regularized by the Management or not.

13.

In the light of the evidence adduced on record, it clearly proves that there existed relationship of employer–

employee between the parties herein. In this regard, reference can be made to the decision in the case of Devinder Singh

1048

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 9, 2019/PHALGUNA 18, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Vs. Municipal Council, Sanaur, AIR 2011 Supreme Courtt 2532, wherein the Hon’ble Apex Court while interpreting the

provisions of Section 2(S) of the Act which deals with the definition of “workman” has observed as under :-

“The source of employment, the quantum of recruitment, the terms & conditions of employment/

contract of service, the quantum of wages/ pay and mode of payment are not at all relevant for

deciding whether or not a person is a workman within the meaning of Section 2(s) of the Act. The

definition of workman also does not make any distinction between full time and part time employee or

a person appointed on contract basis. There is nothing in the plain language of Section 2(s) from

which it can be inferred that only person employed on regular basis or a person employed for doing

whole time job is a workman and the one employed on temporary, part time or contract basis on fixed

wages or as a casual employee or for doing duty for fixed hours is not a workman.”

It is clear from the perusal of aforesaid observations that even if a person is engaged on temporary, part time or contract

basis or for doing any other kind of work and is duly paid wages for the said work, in that eventuality such a person

would be covered by the definition of “workman” as provided in Section 2(S) of the Act. Equally settled is the position

of law that when relationship of employer-employee stands proved between the parties, then onus will shift upon the

employer/management to show that the claimant has not worked for 240 days or more in a calendar year or that the

services of the claimant was terminated in accordance with the provisions of the Act or in accordance with Standing

Order applicable to the establishment concerned . As mentioned above, the sole witness examined by the Management

has conceded that no appointment letter was issued to the claimants to show that they were being engaged for a specific

period for a specific work. It is a matter of record that on 11/12/2015 Management’s witness had taken time for

production of Seniority List of regular daily wager/muster roll employees, list of vacant post from 2007 to 2010, but he

failed to produce the same despite the fact that he was afforded number of opportunities and ultimately on 20/7/2017 he

produced on record Select List of Substitute Safai Karamcharis of Najafgarh Zone in order of merit, as Ex.MW1/1W-1.

Though on 11/12/2015 this witness had taken time for production of Seniority List of regular daily wager/muster roll

employees, list of vacant post from 2007 to 2010, but he failed to produce the same despite the fact that he was afforded

number of opportunities and ultimately on 20/7/2017 he produced on record Select List of Substitute Safai Karamcharis

of Najafgarh Zone in order of merit, as Ex.MW1/1W-1. Though on 11/12/2015 this witness had taken time for

production of Seniority List of regular daily wager/muster roll employees, list of vacant post from 2007 to 2010, but he

failed to produce the same despite the fact that he was afforded number of opportunities and ultimately on 20/7/2017 he

produced on record Select List of Substitute Safai Karamcharis of Najafgarh Zone in order of merit, as Ex.MW1/1W-1.

Though on 11/12/2015 this witness had taken time for production of Seniority List of regular daily wager/muster roll

employees, list of vacant post from 2007 to 2010, but he failed to produce the same despite the fact that he was afforded

number of opportunities and ultimately on 20/7/2017 he produced on record Select List of Substitute Safai Karamcharis

of Najafgarh Zone in order of merit, as Ex.MW1/1W-1. Adverse inference is required to be drawn against the

Management for non production important documents vis-à-vis complete attendance sheet/muster roll charts pertaining

to the claimants herein and list of vacant post/s in the year 2008 when the claimants herein were retrenched/disengaged

on 23/11/2008. Even perusal of the Select List of Substitute Safai Karamcharis (ExMW1/W1) shows that there are

more than hundred of substitute Safai Karamcharis who worked even for about 10 to 15 days have been “Selected” and

included in the aforesaid list. No explanation has come forward from the Management as to why the names of the

claimants herein some of whom admittedly worked for over 240 days and some of whom worked for less than 240 days

but more than 50 days were not included in the Select List. The very contention of the Management that engagement of

the workmen/claimants was for a specific short period and is covered by the provisions of Section 2(oo)(bb) of the Act,

is not tenable inasmuch as MW1 admitted that no appointment letter was issued to the claimants to show that they were

being engaged for a specific period for a specific work and even the said witness could not tell details of employees in

whose place the workmen/claimants were engaged. There is admission on the part of MW1 that no enquiry was

conducted against the claimants before deleting their names from muster roll and further that no seniority list was

displayed on Notice Board before deleting the names of the claimants herein. Needless to mention here that the

Management/MCD was/is required to maintain a list of all such workers whether employed on a daily wage basis or

otherwise for short periods of time so that one may ascertain whether the principles of Section 25-G viz. “first come, last

go” have been followed by the MCD when it regulated or prepared Select List or terminated the services of a workman.

For not preparing or displaying such a list, an adverse inference is required to be drawn against the Management MCD

for failing to comply with Section 25-G of the Act, while terminating the services of the claimants herein. Furthermore,

careful perusal of Select List Ex.MW1/W1 shows that the persons/officials who were engaged during the period from

July, 2007 to December, 2009 and had worked for less than 50 days have been included in the Select List (reference may

be made to details at Sl.No.3035 to 5900 of the said list), whereas no cogent reason has been advanced by the

Management for non inclusion of names of the claimants herein in the Select List. This is indicative of the fact that there

was violation of Section 25-G of the Act in terminating the services of the claimants herein.

14.

There is another aspect of the matter. As mentioned above attendance sheets Ex.MW1/1 to Ex.MW1/0 showed

that four workmen Sombir, Raakhi, Satish and Rajbir had already worked for 260 days, 375 days, 342 days and 458 days

respectively prior to their alleged termination. Admittedly, no notice or compensation in lieu of notice period was given

to the claimants by the Management and as such termination of these claimants/workmen by the Management was in

violation of provisions of Section 25-F of the Act.

15.

Net result of the aforesaid discussion is that there existed relationship of Employer-employee between the

Management & the claimants and the action of the Management in terminating the services of the claimant is held to be

illegal and unjustified.

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ekpZ 9] 2019@iQkYxqu 18] 1940

1049

16.

Now the crucial question for consideration is whether the claimant is entitled to any incidental relief of payment

of back wages and/or reinstatement of service. The claimant in the pleading as well as in their testimony have stated

that they are unemployed since after their termination. The Management has not adduced any evidence to show that the

claimant is gainfully employed somewhere else or that they are in a position to make their both ends meet by doing any

work. Even if it is assumed that the claimants are doing some intermittent or adhoc work to make their both ends meet,

that would not itself amount to gainful employment.

17.

The Hon’ble Apex Court in case “Deepali Gundu Surwase v. Kranti Junior Adhyapak Mahavidyalaya”

reported as (2013) 10 SCC 324 has held as under :

“The propositions which can be culled out from the aforementioned judgments are :

In cases of wrongful termination of service, reinstatement with continuity of service and back

wages is the normal rule.

ii)

Ordinarily, an employee or workman whose services are terminated and who is desirous of

getting back wages is required to either plead or at least make a statement before the

adjudicating authority or the Court of first instance that he/she was not gainfully employed or

was employed on lesser wages. If the employer wants to avoid payment of full back wages,

then I has to plead and also lead cogent evidence to prove that the employee/workman wads

gainfully employed and was getting wages equal to the wages he/she wads drawing prior to

the termination of service. This is so because it is settled law that the burden of proof of the

existence of a particular fact lies on the person who makes a positive averments about its

existence. It is always easier to prove a positive fact than to prove a negative fact. Therefore,

once the employee shows that he was employed, the onus lies on the employer to specifically

plead and prove that the employee was gainfully employed and was getting the same or

substantially similar emoluments.”

18.

The Hon’ble Apex Court also held that different expressions are used for describing the consequence of

termination of a workman’s service/employment/engagement by way of retrenchment without complying with the

mandate of Section 25F of the Act. Sometimes it has been termed as ab initio void, sometimes as illegal per se, sometime

as nullity and sometimes as non est. Leaving aside the legal semantics, we have no hesitation to hold that termination of

service of an employee by way of retrenchment without complying with the requirement of giving one month’s notice or

pay in lieu thereof and compensation in terms of Section 25F (a) and (b) has the effect of rendering the action of the

employer and nullity and the employee is entitled to continue in employment as if his service was not terminated. (Anoop

Sharma Vs. Executive Engineer, Public Health Division No.1 Panipat (2010) 5 SCC 497).

19.

A Bench of three Judges of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Hindustan Tin Works Private Limited v.

Employees of Hindustan Tin Works Private Limited (1979) 2 SCC 80 held that relief of reinstatement with continuity of

service can be granted where termination of service is found to be invalid. It would mean that the employer has taken

away illegally the right to work of the workman contrary to the relevant law or in breach of contract and simultaneously

deprived the workman of his earnings. If thus the act of employer is found to be totally illegal and arbitrary, in that

eventuality the workman is required to be reinstated, with full back wages. Plain common sense also dictates that the

removal of an order terminating the services of workmen must ordinarily lead to the reinstatement of the services of the

workmen alongwith payment of back wages.

20.

However, Hon’ble Apex Court in the case General Manager, Haryana Roadways Vs. Rudan Singh,

reported as 2005 SCC (L&S) 716 observed as under :-

“8. There is no rule of thumb that in every case where the Industrial Tribunal gives a finding that the

termination of service was in violation of Section 25-F of the Act, entire back wages should be awarded. A host

of factors like the manner and method of selection and appointment i.e. whether after proper advertisement of

the vacancy or inviting applications from the employment exchange, nature of appointment namely, whether ad

hoc, short term, daily wage, temporary or permanent in character, any special qualification required for the job

and the like should be weighed and balanced in taking a decision regarding award of back wages. One of the

important factors which has to be taken into consideration is the length of service, which the workman had

rendered with the employer. If the workman has rendered a considerable period of service and his services

are wrongfully terminated, he may be awarded full or partial back wages keeping in view the fact that at this

age and the qualification possessed by him he may not be in a position to get another employment.

However, where the total length of service rendered by a workman is very small, the award of back wages for

the complete period i.e. from the date of termination till the date of the award, which our experience shows is

often quite large, would be wholly inappropriate. A regular service of permanent character cannot be

compared to short or intermittent daily wage employment though it may be for 240 days in a calendar year.”

21.

Yet in another latest case of Bholanath Lal and others Vs. Shree Om Enterprises (P) Ltd.,

Manu/DE/1922/2018 (decided on 10/5/2018), Hon’ble High Court of Delhi while considering the question of illegal

termination and reinstatement held as under :-

“The cases in which the competent court or tribunal finds that the employer has acted in gross violation of the

statutory provisions and/or the principles of natural justice or is guilty of victimizing the employee or workman,

then the court or tribunal concerned will be fully justified in directing payment of full back wages. In such

1050

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 9, 2019/PHALGUNA 18, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

cases, the superior courts should not exercise power under Article 226 or 136 of the Constitution and interfere

with the award passed by the Labour Court, etc. merely because there is a possibility of forming a different

opinion on the entitlement of the employee/workman to get full back wages or the employer’s obligation to pay

the same The courts must always keep in view that that in the cases of wrongful/illegal termination of service,

the wrongdoer is the employer and the sufferer is the employee./workman and there is no justification to give a

premium to the employer of his wrongdoings by relieving him of the burden to pay to the employee/ workman

his dues in the form of full back wages.”

A similar view has been taken in the case of Delhi Jal Board Vs. Vimal Kumar (decided on 5-4-2018)

MANU/de/1322/2018 wherein service of a casual driver was terminated without any notice or payment of one month’s

salary in lieu of such notice. The Industrial Tribunal answering the reference held the action of the management to be

illegal and in violation of Section 25-F of the Act. The Award was upheld by Hon’ble High Court of Delhi by observing

as under :-

“In view of the above discussion, I am unable to discern any illegality or infirmity in the impugned Award,

dated 29^th May, 2003, of the Labour Court, to the extent that it holds the termination of the services of the

respondent, by the petitioner, to be illegal and unlawful. I am entirely in agreement with the finding, of the

Labour Court, that the services of the respondent were retrenched in violation of Section 25-F of the ID Act and

that, therefore, he was entitled to be reinstated in service with all consequential benefits. In view of the fact that

going by the age of the respondent as disclosed in the counter affidavit filed before this Court, he would, today,

be only 50 years of age, and also in view of the fact that the termination of his services as SCM Driver was not

on account of any deficiency or shortcoming detected in the manner of discharge by the respondent, of his

duties as such, I am of the opinion, that the facts of the present case, do not warrant any interference with the

direction, of the Labour Court, to the petitioner to reinstate the respondent in service with the benefit of

continuity of service. The petitioner is, therefore, directed to reinstate the respondent in service forthwith.

Inasmuch as the respondent has not been rendering any service to the petitioner since the date of his

termination, however, the back wages payable to the respondent would be limited to 50 per cent of the wages

which he would have drawn he had continued to serve the petitioner…..”

22.

Having regard to the legal position as discussed above and the fact that the claimants were performing duty to a

post of regular and perennial nature, this Tribunal is of the firm view that the claimants herein are entitled for

reinstatement into service on the same post, with 60 per cent back wages, inasmuch as termination of the

claimants/workmen is per-se illegal and the claimants/workmen are not gainfully employed anywhere since after his

termination by the Management. Award is passed accordingly.

Date : 01.02.2019

AVTAR CHAND DOGRA , Presiding Officer

नई द ली, 15 फरवरी, 2019

का.आ.

का.आ. 344

344

344.ÑऔŽोिगक िववाद अिधिनयम 1947 (1947 का 14) क धारा 17 के अनुसरण मA के23ीय सरकार

मेसस? सिचव, बेटन नदी िनगम झांसी, और अ2य एवं उनके कम?चारी के (बंधतं< के संब_ िनयोजक, और उनके कम?कार, के

बीच अनुबंध मA िन`द?† औŽोिगक िववाद मA के23ीय सरकार औŽोिगक अिधकरण एवं 5म 2यायालय, कानपुर के पंचाट

(संदभ? संVया 35/2017) को (कािशत करती है जो के23ीय सरकार को 14.02.2019 को (ाƒ 0ए थे ।

[सं. एल-42011/156/2016-आईआर (डीयू)]

राजA3 जोशी, उप िनदेशक

New Delhi, the 15th February, 2019

S.O. 344.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 35/2017) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court Kanpur, as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to The secretary

betan river corporation jhansi, & Others, and their workmen which were received by the Central Government on

14.02.19.

[No. L-42011/156/2016-IR (DU)]

RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ekpZ 9] 2019@iQkYxqu 18] 1940

1051

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI RAKESH KUMAR, HJS, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL

TRIBUNAL –CUM-LABOR COURT, KANPUR

ID. No. 35/2017

The President,

Dainik Betan Bhogi Sangh,

Lalitpur U.P.

The Secretary,

Betwa River Corporation,

Jhansi.

AWARD

Central Government, MOL & Emp., New Delhi, vide notification no.L-42011/156/2016-IR(DU) dated

05.06.2017, has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

“Whether the action of the management in relation to the workers of the Daily Rated Workers Sangh who have

been granted temporary status in making payment like regular employees of Group D employees after making

deduction of GPF by providing all Central Facilities (like all kinds of leave, GPF Deduction, Leave

Encashment, Group Insurance, Medical facility, LTC etc) is just and legal? If not, to what relief the workers are

entitled?’’

In instant case after receipt of reference order from the Ministry of Labor & Employment, New Delhi,

registered notices dated 23.06.2017 and 22.06.2017 were issued to the claimant for filing his claim petition but the

worker after being provided opportunities on 04.08.17, 04.09.17, 10.11.17, 03.01.18, 28.03.18, 25.05.18, 21.06.18,

23.08.18, 24.10.18, and on 03.01.19 but none turned up before the tribunal on any of the dates fixed in the case nor any

claim petition was filed on behalf of the Sangh. One Sri Shiv Dayal appeared in the case as Pairokar of the management

and filed his authority dated 01.09.17. In the mean time notices dated 25^th October 2018 and 25.10.18 were again issued

to the Sangh to file its claim petition but thereafter again none appeared before the tribunal in the hearing of the case nor

any claim petition has been filed.

Again the case was taken up for hearing on 23.01.19, but none appeared in the hearing of the case from the side

of the Sangh nor claim petition has been filed. It is also evident that sufficient opportunities have been afforded to the

Sangh for filing the claim petition, but Sangh deliberately failed to avail all such opportunities granted by the tribunal.

It thus appears that the Sangh is not inclined to contest the instant case before this tribunal otherwise they ought

to have filed their claim petition in the case. It is also clear that the representative of the Sangh deliberately neither

appeared in the case nor filed any claim petition for the reasons best known to him. Therefore under the facts and

circumstances of the case the reference is to be adjudicated against the workman for want of pleading and proof

The representative of the Sangh raising the present dispute from his own conduct and behavior does not seem to

be interested in prosecuting the present reference anymore and the tribunal under the facts and circumstances of the case

(supra) decides the reference against the Sangh for want of pleading and proof.

Award as above.

Date: 24.01.19

RAKESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer

नई द ली, 15 फरवरी, 2019

का

का.आ. . . . 345

345

345.—औŽोिगक िववाद अिधिनयम 1947 (1947 का 14) क धारा 17 के अनुसरण मA के23ीय सरकार

मेसस? महािनदेशक (वाक? ) कA 3ीय लोक िनमा?ण िवभाग, नई दली और अ2य एवं उनके कम?चारी के (बंधतं< के संब_

2यायालय-1, नई दली के पंचाट (संदभ? संVया 100/2015) को (कािशत करती है जो के23ीय सरकार को 15.02.2019 को

(ाƒ 0ए थे ।

[सं. एल-42011/125/2014-आईआर (डीयू)]

राजA3 जोशी, उप िनदेशक

1052

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 9, 2019/PHALGUNA 18, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 15th February, 2019

S.O. 345.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 100/2015) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court-1, New Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Director

General (Warks) CPWD, New Delhi and others, and their workmen which were received by the Central Government on

15.02.2019.

[No. L-42011/125/2014-IR (DU)]

RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

IN THE COURT OF SHRI AVTAR CHAND DOGRA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT NO. 1, DWARKA COURTS COMPLEX, DELHI

ID No.100/2015

1. Shri Vijender Singh s/o. Kalyan Singh

2. Hukam Singh s/o. Prem Singh

3. Sunil Kumar s/o. Harpal Sigh,

4. Ashok Kumar s/o. Kalyan Singh

5. Asha Devi widow of late Shri Laxman Prasad,

6.Smt. Rani daughter of late Shri Laxman Prasad,

7. Smt. Sangita daughter of late Shri Laxman Prasad,

8. Ms. Gudia, daughter of late Shri Laxman Prasad,

9. Ms. Ashu, daughter of late Shri Laxman Prasad,

10. Sonu, son of late Shri Laxman Prasad,

(claimants No.5 to 10 are legal heirs of workman Laxman Prasad)

Through

CPWD Mazdoor Union,

Room No.95, Barrack No.1/10,

Jam Nagar House, Shah Jahan Road,

New Delhi – 110 011

…Workmen/Claimants

Versus

The Director General (Works)

C.P.W. D.,

Nirman Bhawan,

New Delhi – 110 001

…Management

AWARD

A reference was received from Ministry of Labour, Government of India vide Letter No.L-42011/125/2014-

IR(DU) dated 13.01.2015 under clause (d) of sub-section(1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947(in short the Act) for adjudication of an industrial dispute, terms of which are as under:

‘Whether the action of the management in terminating the services of Shri Vijender Singh, S/o Shri Kalyan

Singh, Hukam Singh S/o Shri Prem Singh and Shri Sunil Kumar S/o Shri Harpal All with effect from

18.12.2010, Shri Ashok Kumar S/o Shri Kalyan Singh and Shri Laxman Prasad with effect from 25.11.2009

and 16.12.2010 is fair, just & legal? If not, what relief the workmen are entitled? Whether the above workmen

are entitled to be granted the equal pay for equal work from the date of their initial employment as MLC being a

skilled workman as per policy of the management? Whether the workmen Shri Vijender Singh, Shri Hukan

Singh, Shri Sunil Kumar, Shri Ashok Kumar and Shri Laxman Prasad are entitled to be regularized with effect

from 11.12.2006 as per the policy of the management?

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ekpZ 9] 2019@iQkYxqu 18] 1940

1053

After receipt of the above reference, both the parties were put to notice and workmen herein filed statement of

claim giving particulars of their employment with ITDC (in short management ) which is as under:

No.

Name & Father’s Name

(S/Shri)

Division Attached

Date of Joining

Date of

Termination

Vijender Singh S/o Kalyan

Singh

Delhi College of Engineering, PWD

division No.M-333

23.12.1991

18.12.2010

Hukan Singh, S/o Prem

Singh

Do -

22.07.1992

18.12.2010

Sunil Kumar S/o Harpal

Singh

Do -

26.03.1993

18.12.2010

Ashok Kumar S/o Kalyan

Singh

Safdarjung Hospital, Civil Division

02.01.1991

25.11.2009

Laxman Prasad, S/o Kent

- Do -

21.01.1991

16.12.2010

It is averred in the statement of claim filed on that the above claimants are entitled for equal pay for equal work

of skilled workman as per policy of the management from the date of their initial employment with all consequential

benefits, except late Shri Laxman Prasad who is entitled for equal pay for equal work from 21.01.1991 to 04.03.2014 -

the date of his death.

The above claimants filed their claim before the Hon’ble CAT for grant of temporary status provided for Group

D employees but the above claimants were performing duty of Motor Lorry Drivers on work order. However, the

claimants lost their case. Hon’ble High Court accepted the contention of the management that these workmen are not

entitled to temporary status and directed the management to consider the case of the claimants sympathetically vide order

dated 20.07.2010. During pendency of the petition in different courts, management terminated the workmen without

providing one month notice or notice pay and compensation and juniors to the claimants are performing their duties as

MLD on daily wages including work order either on muster roll/Hand receipt/work order. Management has also violated

provisions of last come first go. The claimants have performed their duties continuously without any break and has

completed more than 240 days in each calendar year. The management has violated provisions of Section 25-F, G and H

of the Act.

It is the case of the workmen that in the establishment of CPWD, daily rated employees are being paid equal

pay for equal work and accordingly the claimants are also entitled for such wages from the management as per office

memorandum dated 21.10.1990 as well as 28.01.1991 as skilled workmen. Office memorandum dated 21.10.1990 reads

as under:

‘References have been received from some of the Superintending Engineers/Executive Engineers etc. seeking

clarification regarding method of computing daily rates payable to daily rated workers of CPWD on the concept

of equal pay for equal work. It has been decided that the following formula may be adopted for the purpose of

working out daily rates of wages of daily rated workers of CPWD.’

The total monthly emoluments admissible to regular counter parts of daily rated workers at the minimum of the

respective scale of pay may be multiplied by number of days in a particular month after deducting there-from

the days of absence plus the days of rest falling in the week/weeks in which the worker remained absent and the

result may be divided by the number of days in the month. The figure so arrived will be the daily rate of

wages of the worker.

Illustration : Suppose number of days in a month is A, amount of emoluments in a particular month of a regular

counterpart is B, number of days of absence of worker in a month is C and the number of rest days falling in the

week/weeks on which the worker remained absent is D, then the formal for working out daily rats of wages of a

daily rated worker would be as under:

Daily rate of Wages = A – (C + D) x B

Note : If a worker works for all the working days in a month availing the admissible rest days, he is entitled to

full wages admissible at the minimum stage of the respective scale of pay, including DA/HRA/CCA admissible

to his regular counterparts.’

It is averred that awards in respect of Shri Karam Singh, Shri Baldev Singh and Bal Kishan have been affirmed

by the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi and have allowed them equal pay for equal work except increment as per policy of

the management. Finally, it has been prayed that the management be directed t0 reinstate the claimants with full back

wages, continuity of service and all consequential benefits.

The Management contested the claim petition by filing written statement which was subsequently amended and

took preliminary objections that the workmen were working on contract basis by issuing work orders from time to time

and payment/wages used to be made to them in terms of work orders. In terms of the work order, the workman could be

terminated by the Management without any notice or reason as payment were made for the period of actual duty

1054

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 9, 2019/PHALGUNA 18, 1940

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

performed by the workmen. There exists no relationship of employer and employee between the parties and as such the

claim is not maintainable. While denying the allegations of the workmen on merits, it has been alleged that the workmen

were working on contract basis/work order basis from time to time just to maintain status quo order dated 8/1/1998

issued by the Hon’ble High Court and that their services were discontinued on 18/12/2010 vide order dated 16/12/2010

in the light of judgement dated 20/7/2010 passed by Hon’ble High Court of Delhi. It has also been alleged that the

person working against Group-C posts were not entitled for grant of temporary status under the scheme of temporary

status issued by DOPT and the workmen cannot be absorbed on the post of Motor Lorry Driver/s as no other contract

labour deployed after the date from which the private person/respondent was deployed has been given permanent status

in any department of CPWD. The workman are also not eligible for grant of temporary status in group-D post as the

scheme for temporary status is only for Group-D casual workers and not for C posts. To this effect, office orders dated

14/6/2011 and 26/6/3022 were issued the Management. It is also alleged that Hon’ble High Court of Delhi has already

rejected the petitions of the workmen for reinstatement/regularization vide detailed reasoned order dated 26/4/2013.

Prayer has been made for dismissal of the claim petition with heavy costs.

The claimants/workmen filed rejoinder wherein they denied all the allegations made by the Management and

reiterated their own case as set up in the claim petition.

On the pleadings of the parties, this Tribunal vide order dated 18/01/2017 framed following issues :-

(i)

Whether there is no relationship of employer and employee between the claimant and the management as

alleged ?

(ii)

Whether claim is not legally maintainable in view of preliminary objections ?

(iii) In terms of reference ?

9. The Claimant in support of their case examined Shri B.K. Prasad, General Secretary, CPWD Mazdoor Union as

W.W.1 who tendered his affidavit Ex.WW1/A alongwith documents Ex.WW1/1 to WW1/7. One of the claimants

namely Ashok Kumar also appeared in the witness box as WW2 who tendered his evidence by way of affidavit

Ex.WW2/A and relied on the document Ex.WW1/6.

10.

On the other hand, the Management in order to rebut the case of the claimant examined Shri Keshav Ram,

Executive Engineer, who tendered his evidence by way of affidavit Ex.MW1/A and relied on the documents Ex.MW1/1

to Ex.MW1/8.

11.

I have carefully gone through the evidence adduced on record by both the parties and have given my thoughtful

consideration to rival contentions of Shri B.K. Prasad, A/R for the claimant and Shri B.K. Kashyap, A/R for the

Management.

Issue No.1 to 3 :-

12.

These issues are taken up together as they can be conveniently dsposed by common discussion.

13.

Ld. AR appearing on behalf of the Management strongly contended that there is no relationship of employer

and employee between the Management & claimant and as such the claim petition is not maintainable.

14.

Per contra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Claimant submitted that the claimants were working as

Motor Lorry Drivers with the Management since the year 1991 and that their services were illegally terminated in

December, 2010.

15.

There is no dispute about preposition of law that onus to prove that claimant was in the employment of

Management is always on the workman/claimant and it is for the workman to adduce evidence to prove factum of his

employment with the Management. Such evidence may be in form of receipt of salary or wages for 240 days or record of

his/her appointment or engagement for that year to show that he/she has worked with the employer for 240 days or more

in a Calendar year. In this regard, reference may be made to Batala Coop. Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. Sowaran Singh, (2005)

8 Supreme Court Cases 481 as well as Director Fisheries Terminated Division Vs. Bhikubhai Meghajibhai Gavda

(2012) 1 SCC 47.

16.

This Tribunal has to consider the oral as well as documentary evidence adduced on record so as to decide the

question of relationship of employer and employee between the Management and the claimant herein.

20.

From the pleadings of the parties and evidence adduced on record, it is manifest that the workmen herein had

been working on contract basis by virtue of work orders released from time to time with by the Management with a view

to maintain status quo in compliance with the order of the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi. It is a matter of record that the

claimants herein had filed OA Nos.78/1998, 264/1998, 1443/1998, 264/1998 and 1443/98 which were disposed of by the

Hon’ble Central Administrative Tribunal. The Tribunal in the concluding para of its order dated 23/7/1999 had held as

under :-

“I have carefully considered the submissions of all the counsel present for both the sides. The nature of work

performed was that of a driver. There was no third party contractor. In all these cases, the applicants are both

the contractors and executors. They worked with the vehicle and they are paid their wages, euphemistically

known as a contract amount . It is clear camouflage for employing a daily rated worker as a daily mazdoor for

driving a Car regularly year after year. In view of the Apex Court’s decision in the case of Lalji(supra) I hold

that the applicants are entitled to consideration for temporary status which orders should be passed by the

¹Hkkx IIµ[k.M 3(ii)º

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ekpZ 9] 2019@iQkYxqu 18] 1940

1055

respondents within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order in accordance with the

scheme, Thereafter if there is any post vacant to be filled up the applicants shall be considered along with

others. In considering the applicants, either of a Group D post or for a driver post, the earlier experience of the

applicants shall be considered and given weightage. Age relaxation shall be fully provided.”

It is pertinent to mention here that in para 10 of the amended written statement, the Management has stated that the

workmen were working on contract basis, hence they are not entitled for equal pay for equal work. MW1 Keshav

Ram- sole witness examined by the Management admitted that the claimants were driving vehicle of the Management

and were working under the directions of the Management. Petrol was also being supplied by the Management, although

the claimant were engaged on work order basis. This testimony of MW1 goes to show that claimants were working as

driver/s under the control & supervision of the Management and as such, there existed relationship of employee-

employer between the claimants & Management herein and further that, claimant is a “workman” within the definition

of Section 2(S) of the Act. In this regard, reference can be made to the decision in the case of Devinder Singh Vs.

Municipal Council, Sanaur, AIR 2011 Supreme Court 2532, wherein the Hon’ble Apex Court while interpreting the